summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/8trmp10h.htm
blob: 3eefd8ba6113dad95d2824996b6a0ac359b42d54 (plain) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
1885
1886
1887
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
2073
2074
2075
2076
2077
2078
2079
2080
2081
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090
2091
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2110
2111
2112
2113
2114
2115
2116
2117
2118
2119
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
2127
2128
2129
2130
2131
2132
2133
2134
2135
2136
2137
2138
2139
2140
2141
2142
2143
2144
2145
2146
2147
2148
2149
2150
2151
2152
2153
2154
2155
2156
2157
2158
2159
2160
2161
2162
2163
2164
2165
2166
2167
2168
2169
2170
2171
2172
2173
2174
2175
2176
2177
2178
2179
2180
2181
2182
2183
2184
2185
2186
2187
2188
2189
2190
2191
2192
2193
2194
2195
2196
2197
2198
2199
2200
2201
2202
2203
2204
2205
2206
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2230
2231
2232
2233
2234
2235
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
2253
2254
2255
2256
2257
2258
2259
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272
2273
2274
2275
2276
2277
2278
2279
2280
2281
2282
2283
2284
2285
2286
2287
2288
2289
2290
2291
2292
2293
2294
2295
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2319
2320
2321
2322
2323
2324
2325
2326
2327
2328
2329
2330
2331
2332
2333
2334
2335
2336
2337
2338
2339
2340
2341
2342
2343
2344
2345
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
2353
2354
2355
2356
2357
2358
2359
2360
2361
2362
2363
2364
2365
2366
2367
2368
2369
2370
2371
2372
2373
2374
2375
2376
2377
2378
2379
2380
2381
2382
2383
2384
2385
2386
2387
2388
2389
2390
2391
2392
2393
2394
2395
2396
2397
2398
2399
2400
2401
2402
2403
2404
2405
2406
2407
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413
2414
2415
2416
2417
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425
2426
2427
2428
2429
2430
2431
2432
2433
2434
2435
2436
2437
2438
2439
2440
2441
2442
2443
2444
2445
2446
2447
2448
2449
2450
2451
2452
2453
2454
2455
2456
2457
2458
2459
2460
2461
2462
2463
2464
2465
2466
2467
2468
2469
2470
2471
2472
2473
2474
2475
2476
2477
2478
2479
2480
2481
2482
2483
2484
2485
2486
2487
2488
2489
2490
2491
2492
2493
2494
2495
2496
2497
2498
2499
2500
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506
2507
2508
2509
2510
2511
2512
2513
2514
2515
2516
2517
2518
2519
2520
2521
2522
2523
2524
2525
2526
2527
2528
2529
2530
2531
2532
2533
2534
2535
2536
2537
2538
2539
2540
2541
2542
2543
2544
2545
2546
2547
2548
2549
2550
2551
2552
2553
2554
2555
2556
2557
2558
2559
2560
2561
2562
2563
2564
2565
2566
2567
2568
2569
2570
2571
2572
2573
2574
2575
2576
2577
2578
2579
2580
2581
2582
2583
2584
2585
2586
2587
2588
2589
2590
2591
2592
2593
2594
2595
2596
2597
2598
2599
2600
2601
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2611
2612
2613
2614
2615
2616
2617
2618
2619
2620
2621
2622
2623
2624
2625
2626
2627
2628
2629
2630
2631
2632
2633
2634
2635
2636
2637
2638
2639
2640
2641
2642
2643
2644
2645
2646
2647
2648
2649
2650
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
2656
2657
2658
2659
2660
2661
2662
2663
2664
2665
2666
2667
2668
2669
2670
2671
2672
2673
2674
2675
2676
2677
2678
2679
2680
2681
2682
2683
2684
2685
2686
2687
2688
2689
2690
2691
2692
2693
2694
2695
2696
2697
2698
2699
2700
2701
2702
2703
2704
2705
2706
2707
2708
2709
2710
2711
2712
2713
2714
2715
2716
2717
2718
2719
2720
2721
2722
2723
2724
2725
2726
2727
2728
2729
2730
2731
2732
2733
2734
2735
2736
2737
2738
2739
2740
2741
2742
2743
2744
2745
2746
2747
2748
2749
2750
2751
2752
2753
2754
2755
2756
2757
2758
2759
2760
2761
2762
2763
2764
2765
2766
2767
2768
2769
2770
2771
2772
2773
2774
2775
2776
2777
2778
2779
2780
2781
2782
2783
2784
2785
2786
2787
2788
2789
2790
2791
2792
2793
2794
2795
2796
2797
2798
2799
2800
2801
2802
2803
2804
2805
2806
2807
2808
2809
2810
2811
2812
2813
2814
2815
2816
2817
2818
2819
2820
2821
2822
2823
2824
2825
2826
2827
2828
2829
2830
2831
2832
2833
2834
2835
2836
2837
2838
2839
2840
2841
2842
2843
2844
2845
2846
2847
2848
2849
2850
2851
2852
2853
2854
2855
2856
2857
2858
2859
2860
2861
2862
2863
2864
2865
2866
2867
2868
2869
2870
2871
2872
2873
2874
2875
2876
2877
2878
2879
2880
2881
2882
2883
2884
2885
2886
2887
2888
2889
2890
2891
2892
2893
2894
2895
2896
2897
2898
2899
2900
2901
2902
2903
2904
2905
2906
2907
2908
2909
2910
2911
2912
2913
2914
2915
2916
2917
2918
2919
2920
2921
2922
2923
2924
2925
2926
2927
2928
2929
2930
2931
2932
2933
2934
2935
2936
2937
2938
2939
2940
2941
2942
2943
2944
2945
2946
2947
2948
2949
2950
2951
2952
2953
2954
2955
2956
2957
2958
2959
2960
2961
2962
2963
2964
2965
2966
2967
2968
2969
2970
2971
2972
2973
2974
2975
2976
2977
2978
2979
2980
2981
2982
2983
2984
2985
2986
2987
2988
2989
2990
2991
2992
2993
2994
2995
2996
2997
2998
2999
3000
3001
3002
3003
3004
3005
3006
3007
3008
3009
3010
3011
3012
3013
3014
3015
3016
3017
3018
3019
3020
3021
3022
3023
3024
3025
3026
3027
3028
3029
3030
3031
3032
3033
3034
3035
3036
3037
3038
3039
3040
3041
3042
3043
3044
3045
3046
3047
3048
3049
3050
3051
3052
3053
3054
3055
3056
3057
3058
3059
3060
3061
3062
3063
3064
3065
3066
3067
3068
3069
3070
3071
3072
3073
3074
3075
3076
3077
3078
3079
3080
3081
3082
3083
3084
3085
3086
3087
3088
3089
3090
3091
3092
3093
3094
3095
3096
3097
3098
3099
3100
3101
3102
3103
3104
3105
3106
3107
3108
3109
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
3116
3117
3118
3119
3120
3121
3122
3123
3124
3125
3126
3127
3128
3129
3130
3131
3132
3133
3134
3135
3136
3137
3138
3139
3140
3141
3142
3143
3144
3145
3146
3147
3148
3149
3150
3151
3152
3153
3154
3155
3156
3157
3158
3159
3160
3161
3162
3163
3164
3165
3166
3167
3168
3169
3170
3171
3172
3173
3174
3175
3176
3177
3178
3179
3180
3181
3182
3183
3184
3185
3186
3187
3188
3189
3190
3191
3192
3193
3194
3195
3196
3197
3198
3199
3200
3201
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
3207
3208
3209
3210
3211
3212
3213
3214
3215
3216
3217
3218
3219
3220
3221
3222
3223
3224
3225
3226
3227
3228
3229
3230
3231
3232
3233
3234
3235
3236
3237
3238
3239
3240
3241
3242
3243
3244
3245
3246
3247
3248
3249
3250
3251
3252
3253
3254
3255
3256
3257
3258
3259
3260
3261
3262
3263
3264
3265
3266
3267
3268
3269
3270
3271
3272
3273
3274
3275
3276
3277
3278
3279
3280
3281
3282
3283
3284

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
   <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
   <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) [Netscape]">
   <title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of The First Blast of the Trumpet against the monstrous regiment of Women, by John Knox.
    </title>
<style type="text/css">
    <!--
    H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 {     text-align: center; }
    // -->
    </style>
</head>
<body>


<pre>

The Project Gutenberg EBook of The First Blast of the Trumpet against
the monstrous regiment of Women, by John Knox

Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the
copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing
this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook.

This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project
Gutenberg file.  Please do not remove it.  Do not change or edit the
header without written permission.

Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the
eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file.  Included is
important information about your specific rights and restrictions in
how the file may be used.  You can also find out about how to make a
donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved.


**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts**

**eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971**

*****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!*****


Title: The First Blast of the Trumpet against the monstrous regiment
       of Women

Author: John Knox

Release Date: January, 2006 [EBook #9660]
[Yes, we are more than one year ahead of schedule]
[This file was first posted on October 14, 2003]

Edition: 10

Language: English

Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1

*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FIRST BLAST OF THE TRUMPET ***




Produced by Steve Schulze, Debra Storr and PG Distributed Proofreaders.
Page scans generously made available by the CWRU Preservation Department
Digital Library.





</pre>


<h1>
The First Blast of the Trumpet against the monstrous regiment of Women.</h1>

<h3>
The English Scholar's Library etc.</h3>

<h4>
No. 2.</h4>

<h4>
1558.</h4>

<h4>
Edited by EDWARD ARBER, F.S.A., etc.,</h4>

<h4>
LECTURER IN ENGLISH LITERATURE, ETC., UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LONDON. SOUTHGATE,
LONDON, N.</h4>

<h4>
15 August 1878.</h4>

<h4>
No. 2.</h4>

<h4>
(All rights reserved.)</h4>
[Transcribers Note: The image source for this book was a .pdf of the above
edition.&nbsp; The production of the pdf seems to have generated some errors
e.g. royal1 for royall.&nbsp; Such errors have been fixed but otherwise
the text aims to be true to the printed book.]
<br>
<hr WIDTH="100%">
<h1>
CONTENTS.</h1>
<a NAME="biblio"></a><a href="#bibliography">Bibliography</a>
<p><a NAME="intro"></a><a href="#introduction">INTRODUCTION</a>
<p><a NAME="extracts"></a><a href="#etxracts">Extracts from Mr. DAVID LAING'S
Preface</a>
<hr>
<h2>
<a NAME="preface"></a><a href="#kingdome">The First Blast of the Trumpet
&amp;c.</a></h2>

<h3>
<a href="#kingdome">THE PREFACE.</a></h3>
The wonderful silence of the godly and zealous preachers, the learned men
and of grave judgment, now in exile, that they do not admonish the inhabitants
of "greate Brittanny" how abominable before GOD is the Empire or Rule of
Wicked Woman, yea, of a traitress and bastard.
<p>This is contrary to the examples of the ancient prophets.
<p>I am assured that GOD hath revealed unto some in this our age, that
it is more than a monster in nature that a Woman shall reign and have empire
above Man.
<h3>
<a NAME="aansobj"></a><a href="#kingobj">ANSWERS TO THE OBJECTIONS</a></h3>
Why no such doctrine ought to be published in these our dangerous days.
<p>(a) <i>It may seem to tend to sedition</i>.
<p>(b) <i>It shall be dangerous not only to the writer or publisher, but
to all as shall read the writings, or favour this truth spoken</i>.
<p>(c) <i>It shall not amend the chief offenders, because</i>
<blockquote><i>1. It shall never come to their ears</i>
<p><i>2. They will not be admonished</i>.</blockquote>
If any think that the Empire of Women is not of such importance that for
the surpressing of the same any man is bound to hazard his life: I answer,
that to suppress it, is in the hand of GOD alone; but to utter the impiety
and abomination of the same, I say, it is the duty of every true messenger
of GOD to whom the truth is revealed in that behalf.
<h2>
<a NAME="ablast"></a><a href="#first blast">The First Blast to awake Women
degenerate.</a></h2>

<h3>
<a href="#first blast">THE DECLAMATION.</a></h3>
<i>The</i> Proposition. To promote a Woman to bear rule, superiority, dominion
or empire above any realm, nation or city is
<blockquote>A. Repugnant to nature.
<p>B. Contumely to GOD.
<p>C. The subversion of good order, of all equity and justice.</blockquote>
A. Men illuminated only by the light of nature have seen and determined
that it is a thing most repugnant to nature, that Women rule and govern
over men.
<p>B. 1. Woman in her greatest perfection was made to serve and obey man,
not to rule and command him.
<p>2. After the fall, she was made subject to man by the irrevocable sentence
of GOD. In which sentence there are two parts.
<blockquote>(a) A dolour, anguish and pain as oft as ever she shall be
a mother.
<p>(b) A subjection of her self, her appetites and will to her husband
and his will.</blockquote>
From the former part of this malediction can neither art, nobility, policy
nor law made by man deliver women: but, alas, ignorance of GOD, ambition
and tyranny have studied to abolish and destroy the second part of GOD's
punishment.
<p>3. This subjection, understood by many to be that of the wife to the
husband, is extended by Saint PAUL to women in general To which consent
TERTULLIAN, AUGUSTINE, AMBROSE, CHRYSOSTOM, BASIL
<p>4. The two other Mirrors, in which we may behold the order of Nature.
<blockquote>(a) The natural body of man
<p>(b) The civil body of that Commonwealth [of the Jews] in which GOD by
his own word hath appointed an order.</blockquote>
C. The Empire of a Woman is a thing repugnant to justice, and the destruction
of every commonwealth where it is received.
<blockquote>(a) If justice be a constant and perpetual will to give to
every person their own right: then to give or to will to give to any person
that which is not their right, must repugn to justice. But to reign above
Man can never be the right to Woman: because it is a thing denied unto
her by GOD, as is before declared.
<p>(b) Whatsoever repugneth to the will of GOD expressed in His most sacred
word, repugneth to justice. That Women have authority over Men repugneth
to the will of GOD expressed in His word. Therefore all such authority
repugneth to justice.</blockquote>

<h3>
<a NAME="ablastobj"></a><a href="#firstobj">ANSWERS TO OBJECTIONS.</a></h3>
1. <i>The examples of DEBORAH [Judges iv. 4] and HULDAH [2 Kings xxii 14</i>.]
<p>2. <i>The law of MOSES for the daughters of ZELOPHEHAD [Numb. xxvii.
7, and xxxvi. 11</i>]
<p>3. <i>The consent of the Estates of such realms as have approved the
Empire and Regiment of Women</i>.
<p>4 [<i>The long custom which hath received the Regiment of Women. The
valiant acts and prosperity. Together with some Papistical laws which have
confirmed the same</i>.
<p>*<sup>*</sup>* This objection was not directly replied to; but instead,
the two following ones.]
<blockquote>(a) <i>Albeit Women may not absolutely reign by themselves;
because they may neither sit in judgment, neither pronounce sentence, neither
execute any public office: yet may they do all such things by their Lieutenants,
Deputies, and Judges substitutes</i>.
<p>(b) <i>A woman born to rule over any realm, may choose her a husband;
and to him she may transfer and give her authority and right</i>.</blockquote>

<h3>
<a NAME="aadmon"></a><a href="#admonition">THE ADMONITION.</a></h3>
And now to put an end to the First Blast. Seeing that by the Order of Nature;
by the malediction and curse pronounced against Woman; by the mouth of
Saint PAUL, the interpreter of GOD's sentence; by the example of that Commonwealth
in which GOD by His word planted order and policy; and finally, by the
judgment of the most godly writers: GOD hath dejected women from rule,
dominion, empire and authority above man. Moreover, seeing that neither
the example of DEBORAH, neither the law made for the daughters of ZELOPHEHAD,
neither yet the foolish consent of an ignorant multitude: be able to justify
that which GOD so plainly hath condemned. Let all men take heed what quarrel
and cause from henceforth they do defend. If GOD raise up any noble heart
to vindicate the liberty of his country and to suppress the monstrous Empire
of Women: let all such as shall presume to defend them in the same, most
certainly know; that in so doing they lift their hand against GOD, and
that one day they shall find His power to fight against their foolishness.
<h2>
<a NAME="areader"></a><a href="#to the reader">JOHN KNOX to the Reader</a></h2>

<h3>
<a NAME="aapendix"></a><a href="#appendix">APPENDIX.</a></h3>

<h4>
1559.</h4>
<a href="#12july">12 July. JOHN KNOX to Sir WILLIAM CECIL</a>
<p><a href="#20july">20 July. JOHN KNOX'S Declaration to Queen ELIZABETH</a>
<h4>
1561.</h4>
<a href="#20march">20 Mar. THOMAS RANDOLPH to Sir WILLIAM CECIL</a>
<p><a href="#5aug">5 Aug. JOHN KNOX'S Second Defence to Queen ELIZABETH</a>
<p><a href="#private opinion">Extracts from JOHN KNOX'S History of the
Church of Scotland</a>
<p>
<hr width="100%">
<br>&nbsp;
<h1>
<a NAME="bibliography"></a><i><a href="#biblio">BIBLIOGRAPHY.</a></i></h1>

<h2>
<i>The First Blast of the Trumpet etc.</i></h2>

<h3>
ISSUES IN THE AUTHOR'S LIFETIME.</h3>

<h4>
A. <i>As a separate publication</i>.</h4>
1. 1558. [i.e. early in that year at Geneva. 8vo.] See title at p. 1.
<h4>
B. <i>With other Works.</i></h4>
None known.
<h3>
ISSUES SINCE HIS DEATH.</h3>

<h4>
A. <i>As a separate publication</i>.</h4>
2. [?1687? Edinburgh.] 8vo. The First Blast of the Trumpet against the
monstrous Regimen[t] of Women.
<p>4. 15. Aug. 1878. Southgate London N.
<blockquote><i>English Scholar's Library</i>. The present impression.</blockquote>

<h4>
B. <i>With other Works</i>.</h4>
1846-1848. Edinburgh. 8vo. <i>Bannatyne Club</i>. The Works of JOHN KNOX.
<blockquote>Collected and edited by DAVID LAING. In 6 Vols. A special and
limited edition of 112 copies of the First Two Volumes was struck off for
this Printing Club.</blockquote>
1846-1848. Edinburgh. 8vo. <i>Wodrow Club</i>.
<blockquote>The same Two Volumes issued to this Society.</blockquote>
1854-1864. Edinburgh. 8vo.
<blockquote>The remaining Four Volumes published by Mr. T. G. STEVENSON.
The First Blast &amp;c. is at Vol. iv. 349.</blockquote>

<h2>
Early Replies to the First Blast etc.</h2>
1. 26 Apr. 1559. Strasburgh. 4to. [JOHN AYLMER, afterwards Bishop of LONDON].
<blockquote>An Harborovve for faithfull and trewe subiectes, agaynst the
late blowne Blaste, concerninge the Gouernmente of VVemen wherin he confuted
all such reasons as a straunger of late made in that behalfe, with a breife
exhortation to Obedience. Anno. M.D. lix.
<p>[This calling John Knox a "stranger" sounds to us like a piece of impudence,
but may bring home to us that Scotland was then to Englishmen a foreign
country.]</blockquote>
2. 1565-6. Antwerp. 8vo. PETRUS FRARINUS, M.A.
<blockquote>Oration against the Vnlawfull Insurrections of the Protestantes
of our time, under the pretence to refourme religion.
<p>Made and pronounced in the Schole of Artes at Louaine, the xiiij of
December. Anno 1565. And now translated into English with the aduise of
the Author. Printed by JOHN FOWLER in 1566.
<p>The references to KNOX and GOODMAN are at E. vj and F. ij. At the end
of this work is a kind of Table of Contents, each reference being illustrated
with a woodcut depicting the irightful cruelties with which the Author
in the text charges the Protestants. One woodcut is a curious representation
of GOODMAN and NOKES.
<p>Doctor FULKE wrote a <i>Confutation</i> of this work.</blockquote>
3. 1579. Paris. 8vo. DAVID CHAMBERS of Ormond.
<blockquote>Histoire abreg&eacute;e de tous les Roys de France, Angleterre
et Escosse, etc. In three Parts, each with a separate Title page.
<p>The Third Part is dated 21 August 1573; is dedicated to CATHERINE DE
MEDICI; and is entitled
<p>Discours de la legitime succession des femmes aux possessions de leurs
parens: et du gouernement des princesses aux Empires et Royaumes.</blockquote>
4. 1584. [Printed abroad]. 8vo. JOHN LESLEY, Bishop of ROSS.
<blockquote>A treatise towching the right, title and interest of the most
Excellent Princesse MARIE, Queen of Scotland, And of the most noble King
JAMES, her Graces sonne, to the succession of the Crowne of England. ...
Compiled ahd published before in Latin, and after in English. The Blast
is alluded to at C. 2.</blockquote>
5. 1590. [Never printed.] Lord HENRY HOWARD [created Earl of NORTHAMPTON
13 March 1604.], a voluminous writer, but few of whose writings ever came
to the press.
<blockquote>A dutifull defence of the lawfull Regiment of women deuided
into three bookes. The first conteyneth reasons and examples grounded on
the law of nature. The second reasons and examples grownded on the Ciuile
lawes. The third reasons and examples grounded on the sacred lawes of god
with an awnswer to all false and friuolous obiections which haue bene most
vniustlie cowntenaunced with deceitfull coulores forced oute of theis lawes
in disgrace of their approued and sufficient authorytie. <i>Lansd. MS</i>.
813 and <i>Harl. MS</i>. 6257.</blockquote>

<hr width="100%">
<h1>
<a NAME="introduction"></a><a href="#intro">INTRODUCTION.</a></h1>
At the time this tract was written the destinies, immediate and prospective,
of the Protestant faith seemed to lay wholly in the laps of five women,
viz:--
<p>CATHERINE DE MEDICI, Queen of France.
<p>MARIE DE LORRAINE, Queen Regent of Scotland, whose sole heir was her
daughter MARY, afterwards Queen of Scots.
<p>MARY TUDOR, Queen of England, having for her heir apparent the Princess
ELIZABETH.
<p>Of these, the last--also of least account at this moment, being in confinement--was
the only hope of the Reformers. The other four, largely directing the affairs
of three kingdoms, were steadfastly hostile to the new faith. Truly, the
odds were heavy against it. Who could have anticipated that within three
years of the writing of this book both MARY TUDOR and MARY DE LORRAINE
would have passed away; that KNOX himself would have been in Scotland carrying
on the Reformation; and that ELIZABETH would have commenced her marvellous
reign. So vast a change in the political world was quite beyond all reasonable
foresight.
<p>Meanwhile there was only present to the vision and heart of the Reformer
as he gazed seaward, from Dieppe, but the unceasing blaze of, the martyr
fires spreading from Smithfield all over England. Month after month this
horrid work was deliberately carried on and was increasing in intensity.
<blockquote>We se our countrie set furthe for a pray to foreine nations,
we heare the blood of our brethren, the membres of Christ Iesus most cruellie
to be shed, and the monstruous empire of a cruell women (the secrete counsel
of God excepted) we knowe to be the onlie occasion of all the miseries:
and yet with silence we passe the time as thogh the mater did nothinge
appertein to vs. p. 3.</blockquote>
The vigour of the persecution had struck all heart out of the Protestants.
Was this to go on for ever? Heart-wrung at the ruthless slaughter--as we,
in our day, have been by the horrors of the Indian mutiny or of the Bulgarian
atrocities---the Reformer sought to know the occasion of all these calamities.
At that moment, he found it in the Empire of Woman. Afterwards he referred
much of this book to the time in which it was written [pp. 58 and 61].
Shall we say that his heart compelled his head to this argument, that his
indignation entangled his understanding on this subject? Just as MILTON
was led to the discussion of the conditions of divorce, through his desertion
by his wife MARY POWELL; so the fiery martyrdoms of England led KNOX to
denounce the female sex in the person of her whom we still call "Bloody
MARY" that was the occasion of them all.
<p>If in the happiest moment of his happiest dream, JOHN KNOX could have
foreseen our good and revered Queen VICTORIA reigning in the hearts of
the millions of her subjects, and ruling an Empire wider by far than those
of Spain and Portugal in his day; if he could have seen England and Scotland
ONE COUNTRY, bearing the name which, as almost of prophecy, he has foreshadowed
for them in this tract, "the Ile of greate Britanny;" if he could have
beheld that one country as it now abides in its strength and its wealth,
the most powerful of European states; if he could have realized free Italy
with Rome, the Popes without temporal power, and modern civilisation more
than a match for Papal intrigues; if he could have known that the gospel
for which he lived had regenerated the social life of Great Britain, that
it was tha confessed basis of our political action and the perennial spring
of our Christian activities, so that not merely in physical strength, but
in moral, force and mental enlightenment we are in the van of the nations
of the world: if the great Scotch Reformer had but had a glimpse of this
present reality, this tract would never have been written, and he would
willingly have sung the paean of aged SIMEON and passed out of this life.
<p>But this work was the offspring of the hour of darkness, if not of despair.
Something must be done. A warrior of the pen, he would forge a general
argument against all female rule that would inclusively destroy the legal
right of MARY to continue these atrocities.
<h2>
II.</h2>
The first note of this trumpet blast, "The Kingdom apperteineth to our
GOD," shows us the vast difference between the way in which men regarded
the Almighty Being then and now. Shall we say that the awe of the Deity
has departed! Now so much stress is laid on the Fatherhood of GOD: in KNOX'S
time it was His might to defend His own or to take vengeance on all their
murderers. Both views are true. Nevertheless this age does seem wanting
in a general and thorough reverence for His great name and character.
<p>KNOX seems like some great Hebrew seer when he thus pronounces the doom
of MARY and her adherents.
<blockquote>The same God, who did execute this greuous punishment, euen
by the handes of those, whom he suffred twise to be ouercomen in batel,
doth this day retein his power and iustice. Cursed Iesabel of England,
with the pestilent and detestable generation of papistes, make no litle
bragge and boast, that they haue triumphed not only against Wyet, but also
against all such as haue entreprised any thing against them or their procedinges.
But let her and them consider, that yet they haue not preuailed against
god, his throne is more high, then that the length of their hornes be able
to reache. And let them further consider, that in the beginning of their
bloodie reigne, the haruest of their iniquitie was not comen to full maturitie
and ripenes. No, it was so grene, so secret I meane, so couered, and so
hid with hypocrisie, that some men (euen the seruantes of God) thoght it
not impossible, but that wolues might be changed in to lambes, and also
that the vipere might remoue her natural venom. But God, who doth reuele
in his time apointed the secretes of hartes, and that will haue his iudgementes
iustified euen by the verie wicked, hath now geuen open testimonie of her
and their beastlie crueltie. For man and woman, learned and vnlearned,
nobles and men of baser sorte, aged fathers and tendre damiselles, and
finailie the bones of the dead, as well women as men haue tasted of their
tyrannie, so that now not onlie the blood of father Latimer, of the milde
man of God the bishop of Cantorburie, of learned and discrete Ridley, of
innocent ladie Iane dudley, and many godly and worthie preachers, that
can not be forgotten, such as fier hath consumed, and the sworde of tyrannie
moste vniustlie hath shed, doth call for vengeance in the eares of the
Lord God of hostes: but also the sobbes and teares of the poore oppressed,
the groninges of the angeles, the watch men of the Lord, yea and euerie
earthlie creature abused by their tyrannie do continuallie crie and call
for the hastie execution of the same. I feare not to say, that the day
of vengeance, whiche shall apprehend that horrible monstre Iesabal of England,
and suche as maintein her monstruous crueltie, is alredie apointed in the
counsel of the Eternall; and I verelie, beleue that it is so nigh, that
she shall not reigne so long in tyrannie, as hitherto she hath done, when
God shall declare him selfe to be her ennemie, when he shall poure furth
contempt vpon her, according to her crueltie, and shal kindle the hartes
of such, as sometimes did fauor her with deadly hatred against her, that
they may execute his iudgementes. And therfore let such as assist her,
take hede what they do.</blockquote>

<h2>
III.</h2>
There are some notable incidental matters in this tract.
<p>First in matters of State. As
<blockquote>The spaniardes are Iewes and they bragge that Marie of England
is the roote of Iesse. p. 46.</blockquote>
That most important testimony that the Reformation under EDWARD VI was
mainly the work of the King and his court; as it had been in the days of
his father HENRY VIII.
<blockquote>For albeit thou diddest not cease to heape benefit vpon benefit,
during the reigne of an innocent and tendre king, yet no man did acknowledge
thy potent hand and meruelouse working. The stoute courage of capitaines,
the witte and policie of counselers, the learning of 'bishoppes[1], did
robbe the of thy glorie and honor. For what then was heard, as concerning
religion, but the kinges procedinges, the kinges procedinges must be obeyed?
It is enacted by parliament: therefore it is treason to speake in the contrarie.
p. 30.</blockquote>
The political shrewdness of the Writer on the entanglement of England in
the Spanish War against France, whereby we lost Calais on the 6th January
1558.
<blockquote>They see their owne destruction, and yet they haue no grace
to auoide it. Yea they are becomen so blinde, that knowing the pit, they
headlong cast them selues into the same, as the nobilitie[2] of England,
do this day, fighting in the defense of their mortall ennemie the Spaniard.
Finallie they are so destitute of vnderstanding and iudgement, that althogh
they knowe that there is a libertie and fredome, the whiche their predecessors
haue inioyed; yet are they compelled to bowe their neckes vnder the yoke
of Satan, and of his proude ministres, pestilent papistes and proude spaniardes.
And yet can they not consider that where a woman reigneth and papistes
beare authoritie, that there must nedes Satan be president of the counsel,
p. 31.</blockquote>
The absence of any specific allusion to Calais shows that this book was
wholly written before its capture.
<p>Next, in the imagery with which he expresses his insight into the nature
of things. As
<blockquote>It is a thing verie difficile to a man, (be he neuer so constant)
promoted to honors, not to be tickled some what with pride (for
<br>the winde of vaine glorie doth easelie carie vp the, drie dust of the
earth). p. 19.
<p>The wise, politic, and quiet spirites of this world, p. 8.</blockquote>

<blockquote>The veritie of God[3] is of that nature, that at one time or
at other, it will pourchace to it selfe audience. It is an odour and smell,
that can not be suppressed, yea it is a trumpet that will sound in despite
of the adversarie.</blockquote>
Lastly, the marvellous lashing of women, throughout: climaxing in
<blockquote>Woman ... the porte and gate of the deuil.</blockquote>

<hr width="100%">
<h2>
IV.</h2>
This work is therefore to us rather "the groaning of this angel," this
"watchman of the LORD" at the national subjection, the fiery martyrdoms,
"the sobs and tears of the poor oppressed;" than the expression of any
fundamental principle on which GOD has constituted human society. Intellectually,
there is partiality, forgetfulness and disproportion in the argument. It
applies as much to a Man as to a Woman, and more to a wicked than a good
Woman. He started on the assumption that almost all women in authority
were wicked. Time however alters many things; and he lived to love and
reverence Queen ELIZABETH.
<p>So these trumpet notes are the outpouring of a very great nature, if
not of a great thinker; of one whose absolute and dauntless devotion to
GOD, to truth, to right, whose burning indignation against wrong-doing
and faith in the Divine vengeance to overtake it, fitted him to do a giant's
work in the Reformation, and will enshrine his memory in the affection
of all good men till time shall end.
<p>[Marginal Note 1: what robbed God of his honor in England in the time
of the Gospell.]
<p>[Marginal Note 2: The nobilitie and the hole realme of England, caste
themselves willing in to the pit.]
<p>[Marginal Note 3: The propertie of Goddes truth.]
<p>
<hr width="100%">
<h1>
<a NAME="etxracts"></a><a href="#extracts">EXTRACTS FROM MR. DAVID LAING'S
PREFACE.</a></h1>
With some other hints, gratefully acknowledged.
<p>Of the various writings of the Reformer, no one was the occasion of
exciting greater odium than his <i>First Blast against the monstrous Regiment
or Government of Women</i>. Unlike all his other publications, it appeared
anonymously, although he had no intention of ultimately concealing his
name. His purpose was, as he tells us, "Thrice to Blow the Trumpet in the
same matter, if GOD so permit," and, on the last occasion, to announce
himself as the writer, to prevent any blame being imputed to others. This
intention, it is well known, was never carried into effect. That KNOX'S
views were in harmony with those of his colleagues, GOODMAN, WHITTINGHAM,
and GILBY, need hardly be stated: but the reception of the little work
fully confirmed the Author's opinion, that it would not escape "the reprehension
of many." This may in a great measure be attributed to the course of public
events within a few months of its publication.
<p>The subject of Female Government had engaged his attention at an earlier
period. One of his Questions submitted to BULLINGER in 1554 was "Whether
a Female can preside over, and rule a kingdom by divine right?" And in
answer to some doubts regarding the Apparel of Women, he himself says that
"if women take upon them the office which GOD hath assigned to men, they
shall not escape the Divine malediction." In his <i>Additions</i> to the
<i>Apology
for The Protestants in prison at Paris</i>, he expresses his conviction
that the government of Princes had come to that state of iniquity that
"no godly person can enjoy office or authority under them." This assertion
indeed was not specially applicable to Female government, but his feelings
in reference to the persecutions in England under MARY, and in Scotland
under the Queen Regent, impelled him to treat of a subject which all others
at the time seemed most sedulously to avoid.
<p>His First <i>Blast</i> was probably written at Dieppe towards the end
of 1557; and it was printed early in the following year at Geneva, as is
apparent upon comparison with other books from the press of JOHN CRESPIN
in that city.
<p>A copy of the work having been sent to JOHN FOX, then residing at Basle,
he wrote "a loving and friendly letter" to the author, in which he expostulates
with him on the impropriety of the publication. In KNOX'S reply, dated
the 18th of May 1558, he says, he will not excuse "his rude vehemencie
and inconsidered affirmations, which may appear rather to proceed from
choler than of zeal or reason." "To me," he adds, "it <i>is</i> enough
to say, that black is not white, an'd man's tyranny and foolishness is
not GOD's perfect ordinance."
<p>The similar work of GOODMAN on <i>Obedience to Superior</i> Powers which
appeared at Geneva about the same time, was also suggested by the persecuting
spirit which then prevailed. But both works were published somewhat unseasonably,
as such questions on <i>Government</i> and <i>Obedience</i>, it is justly
observed, might have been more fitly argued when a King happened to fill
the throne. The terms used by GOODMAN in reference to MARY, Queen of England,
are not less violent than unseemly. She died on the 17th of November 1558,
and her successor regarded the authors of those works with the utmost dislike;
although neither of them, in their writings, had any special reference
or the least intention of giving offence to Queen ELIZABETH....
<p>That these works, and every person supposed to entertain similar sentiments,
should be regarded with marked aversion by Queen ELIZABETH, need excite
no surprise.
<p>In the beginning of the year 1559, CALVIN having revised and republished
his <i>Commentaries</i> on <i>ISAIAH</i>, originally dedicated to EDWARD
VI. in 1551; he addressed the work in a printed Epistle to Her Majesty:
but his messenger brought him back word that his homage was not kindly
received by Her Majesty, because she had been offended with him by reason
of some writings published with his approbation at Geneva.
<p>CALVIN felt so greatly annoyed at this imputation, that he addressed
a letter<a NAME="FNanchor1"></a><sup><a href="#Footnote1">[1]</a></sup>
to Sir WILLIAM CECIL, in which he expresses himself with no small degree
of asperity on the subject of KNOX'S First B<i>last</i>. He says--
<blockquote>Two years ago [i.e. <i>in</i> 1557] JOHN KNOX asked of me,
in a private conversation, what I thought about the Government of Women.
I candidly replied, that as it was a deviation from the original and proper
order of nature, it was to be ranked, no less than slavery, among the punishments
consequent
upon the fall of man: but that there were occasionally women so endowed,
that the singular good qualities which shone forth in them made it evident
that they were raised up by Divine authority; either that GOD designed
by such examples to condemn the inactivity of men, or for the better setting
forth of His own glory. I brought forth Huldah and Deborah; and added,
that GOD did not vainly promise by the mouth of Isaiah that "Queens should
be nursing mothers of the Church"; by which prerogative it is very evident
that they are distinguished from females in private life. I came at length
to this conclusion, that since, both by custom, and public consent, and
long practice, it hath been established, that realms and principalities
may descend to females by hereditary right, it did not appear to me necessary
to move the question, not only because the thing would be most invidious;
but because in my opinion it would not be lawful to unsettle governments
which are ordained by the peculiar providence of GOD.
<p>I had no suspicion of the book, and for a whole year was ignorant of
its publication. When I was informed of it by certain parties, I sufficiently
shewed my displeasure that such paradoxes should be published; but as the
remedy was too late, I thought that the evil, which could not now be corrected,
should rather be buried in oblivion than made a matter of agitation.
<p>Inquire also at your father in law [Sir ANTHONY COOKE] what my reply
was, when he informed me of the circumstance through Beza. And MARY was
still living, so that I could not be suspected of flattery.
<p>What the books contain, I cannot tell; but KNOX himself will allow that
my conversation with him was no other than what I have now stated.</blockquote>
Calvin then proceeds to say, that great confusion might have arisen by
any decided opposition, and there would have been cause to fear, that in
such a case--
<blockquote>By reason of the thoughtless arrogance of one individual, the
wretched crowd of exiles would have been driven away, not only from this
city [of Geneva] but even from almost the whole world.</blockquote>
Some years later, and subsequent to CALVIN'S death, BEZA, in a letter to
BULLINGER, adverts to Queen ELIZABETH'S continued dislike to the
<br>Church of Geneva. In his letter, dated the 3rd of September 1566, he
says--
<blockquote>Some years later, and subsequent to CALVIN'S death, BEZA, in
a letter to BULLINGER, adverts to Queen ELIZABETH'S continued dislike to
the Church of Geneva. In his letter, dated the 3rd of September 1566, he
says--&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; For as to our Church, I would have you know
that it is so hateful
<br>For as to our Church, I would have you know that it is so hateful to
the Queen [of England], that on this account she has never said a single
word in acknowledgement of the gift of my <i>Annotations [on the New Testament]</i>.
The reason of her dislike is twofold; one, because we are accounted too
severe and precise, which is very displeasing to those who fear reproof;
the other is, because formerly, though without our knowledge, during the
lifetime of Queen MARY, two books were published here in the English language,
one by Master KNOX against the <i>Government of Women</i>, the other by
Master GOODMAN on the <i>Rights of the Magistrate</i>. As soon as we learned
the contents of each, we were much displeased, and their sale was forbidden
in consequence; but she,&nbsp; notwithstanding, cherishes the opinion she
has taken into her head<a NAME="FNanchor2"></a><sup><a href="#Footnote2">[2]</a></sup>.</blockquote>
<a NAME="Footnote1"></a><a href="#FNanchor1">[1]&nbsp;</a> The letter is
not dated, but it was subsequent to one written on the 29th of January
1559 [i.e. 1560], <i>Zurich Letters</i>. Second Series, p. 35.
<br><a NAME="Footnote2"></a><a href="#FNanchor2">[2]&nbsp;</a> <i>Zurich
Letters</i>. Second Series, p. 34.
<p>
<hr width="100%">
<h1>
<a NAME="first blast"></a><a NAME="kingdome"></a><a href="#preface">THE
FIRST BLAST OF THE TRUMPET AGAINST THE MONSTRVOVS REGIMENT OF WOMEN.</a></h1>

<h2>
Veritas temporis filia,</h2>

<h3>
M. D. LVIII.</h3>

<hr width="100%">
<h1>
THE KINGDOME APPERTEINETH TO OVR GOD.</h1>

<table CELLSPACING=15 >
<tr>
<td>Wonder it is, that amongest so many pregnant wittes as the Ile of greate
Brittanny hath produced, so many godlie and zelous preachers as England
did somtime norishe, and amongest so many learned and men of graue iudgement,
as this day by Iesabel are exiled, none is found so stowte of courage,
so faithfull to God, nor louing to their natiue countrie, that they dare
admonishe the inhabitantes of that Ile how abominable before God, is the
Empire or Rule of a wicked woman, yea of a traiteresse and bastard. And
what may a people or nation left destitute of a lawfull head, do by the
authoritie of Goddes worde in electing and appointing common rulers and
magistrates. That Ile (alas) for the contempt and horrible abuse of Goddes
mercies offred, and for the shamefull reuolting to Satan frome Christ Iesus,
and frome his Gospell ones professed, doth iustlie merite to be left in
the handes of their own counsel, and so to come to confusion and bondage
of strangiers. But yet I feare that this vniuersall negligence<a NAME="amn1"></a><sup><a href="amn1">[a]</a></sup>
of such as somtimes were estemed watchemen, shall rather aggrauate our
former ingratitude, then excuse this our vniuersall and vngodlie silence,
in so weightie a mater. We se our countrie set furthe for a pray to foreine
nations, we heare the blood of our brethren, the membres of Christ Iesus
most cruellie to be shed, and the monstruous empire of a cruell woman (the
secrete counsel of God excepted) we knowe to be the onlie occasion of all
these miseries: and yet with silence we passe the time as thogh the mater
did nothinge appertein to vs. But the contrarie examples of the auncient
prophetes<a NAME="amn2"></a><sup><a href="#mn2">[b]</a></sup> moue me to
doubte of this our fact. For Israel did vniuersalie decline frome God by
embrasing idolatrie vnder Ieroboam. In whiche they did continue euen vnto
the destruction of their common welthe<a NAME="amn3"></a><sup><a href="#mn3">[c]</a></sup>.
And Iuda withe Ierusalem did followe the vile superstition and open iniquitie
of Samaria<a NAME="amn4"></a><sup><a href="#mn4">[d]</a></sup>. But yet
ceased not the prophetes of God to admonishe the one and the other: Yea
euen after that God had poured furthe his plagues vpon them<a NAME="amn5"></a><sup><a href="#mn5">[e]</a></sup>.
For Ieremie did write to the captiues of Babylon, and did correct their
errors, plainlie instructing them, who did remaine in the middest of that
idolatrouse nation. Ezechie<a NAME="amn6"></a>l<sup><a href="#mn6">[f]</a></sup>
frome the middest of his brethren prisoners in Chaldea, did write his vision
to those that were in Ierusalem, and sharplie rebukinge their vices, assured
them that they shuld not escape the vengeance of God by reason of their
abominations committed.</td>

<td><a NAME="mn1"></a><i><a href="#amn1">[a]</a>: the Negligence of watchemen.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn2"></a><i><a href="#amn2">[b]</a>: The diligence of the olde
prophetes of God.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn3"></a><i><a href="#amn3">[c]</a>: I. Reg. 12.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn4"></a><i><a href="#amn4">[d]</a>: Ezech. 16.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn5"></a><i><a href="#amn5">[e]</a>: Ierem. 29.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn6"></a><i><a href="#amn6">[f]</a>: Ezech. 7,8,9.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>The same prophetes for comfort of the afflicted and chosen saintes
of God, who did lie hyd amongest the reprobate of that age<a NAME="amn7"></a><sup><a href="amn7">[g]</a></sup>
(as commonlie doth the corne amongest the chaffe) did prophecie and before
speake the changes of kingdomes, the punishmentes of tyrannes, and the
vengeance<a NAME="amn8"></a><sup><a href="#mn8">[h]</a></sup> whiche God
wold execute vpon the oppressors of his people. The same did Daniel and
the rest of the prophetes euerie one in their season. By whose examples
and by the plaine precept, which is geuen to Ezechiel, commanding him that
he shall say to the wicked: Thou shalt die the death. We in this our miserable
age are bounde to admonishe<a NAME="amn9"></a><sup><a href="#mn8">[i]</a></sup>
the world and the tyrannes thereof, of their sodeine destruction, to assure
them, and to crie vnto them, whether they list to heare or not. That the
blood of the saintes, which by them is shed, continuallie crieth and craueth<a NAME="amn10"></a><sup><a href="#mn10">[j]
</a></sup>vengeance
in the presence of the Lorde of hostes. And further it is our dutie to
open the truthe reueled vnto vs, vnto the ignorant and blind world, vnlest
that to our owne condemnation we list to wrap vp and and hyde the talent
committed to our charge. I am assured that God hath reueled to some in
this our age, that it is more then a monstre in nature, that a woman shall
reigne and haue empire aboue man. And yet with vs all, there is suche silence,
as if God therewith were nothing offended. The naturall man, ennemy to
God shall fynd, I knowe, many causes why no suche doctrine oght to be published
in these our dangerous dayes. First, for that it may seme to tend to sedition<a NAME="amn11"></a><sup><a href="#mn11">[k]</a></sup>:
secondarilie, it shal be dangerous, not onlie to the writer or publisher,
but also to all such as shall reade the writinges, or fauor this truth
spoken: and last it shall not amend the chief offenders, partlie because
it shall neuer come to their eares, and partlie because they will not be
admonished in such cases. I answer, yf any of these be a sufficient reason
that a truth knowen shalbe conceled, then were the auncient prophetes of
God very fooles, who did not better prouide for their owne quietnes, then
to hasard their liues for rebuking of vices, and for the opening of such
crimes, as were not knowen to the world, And Christ Iesus did iniurie to
his Apostles, commanding them to preache repentance and remission of synnes
in his name to euerie realme and nation. And Paule did not vnderstand his
owne libertie, when he cried, wo be to me, if I preache not the Euangile.
Yf feare, I say, of persecution<a NAME="amn12"></a><sup><a href="#mn13">[l]</a></sup>,
of sclander, or of any inconuenience before named might have excused, and
discharged the seruantes of God<a NAME="amn13"></a><sup><a href="#mn13">[m]</a></sup>,
from plainlie rebuking the sinnes of the world; iuste cause had euerie
one of them to haue ceased frome their office. For sodeinlie their doctrine
was accused by termes of sedition, of newe learning, and of treason: persecution
and vehement trouble did shortlie come vpon the professours with the preachers<a NAME="amn14"></a><sup><a href="#mn14">[n]</a></sup>:
kinges, princes and worldlie rulers did conspire against God and against
his anoynted Christ Iesus. But what? Did any of these moue the prophetes
and Apostles to faynt in their vocation? no. But by the resistance, whiche
the deuill made to them by his suppostes, were they the more inflamed to
publishe the truthe reueled vnto them and to witnesse with their blood,
that greuous condemnation and Goddes heuie vengeance shuld folowe the proude
contempt of graces offred. The fidelitie, bold courage, and constancie
of those that are passed before vs, oght to prouoke vs to folowe their
footsteppes, onles we loke for an other kingdome then Christ hath promised
to such as perseuere in profession of his name to the end. Yf any think
that the empire of women, is not of such importance, that for the suppressing
of the same, any man is bounde to hasarde his life, I answer, that to suppresse
it, is in the hand of god alone. But to vtter the impietie and abomination
of the same, I say, it is the dutie of euerie true messager of God, to
whome the truth is reueled in that behalfe. For the especiall dutie<a NAME="amn15"></a><sup><a href="#mn15">[o]</a></sup>
of Goddes messagers is to preache repentance, to admonishe the offenders
of their offenses, and to say to the wicked, thou shalt die the death,
except thou repent. This, I trust, will no man denie to be the propre office
of all Goddes messagers to preache (as I haue said) repentance and remission
of synnes. But nether of both can be done, except the conscience of the
offenders be accused and conuicted of transgression. For howe shall any
man repent not knowing wher in he hath offended? And where no repentance
is founde<a NAME="amn16"></a><sup><a href="#mn16">[p]</a></sup>, there
can be no entrie to grace. And therfore I say, that of necessitie it is,
that, this monstriferouse empire of women, (which amongest all enormities,
that this day do abound vpon the face of the hole earth, is most detestable
and damnable) be openlie reueled and plainlie declared to the world, to
the end that some may repent and be saued. And thus farre to the first
sorte.</td>

<td><a NAME="mn7"></a><i><a href="#amn7">[g]</a>: God alway had his people
amongst the wicked, who neuer lacked their prophetes and teachers.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn8"></a><i><a href="#amn8">[h]</a>: Isaie. 13. Ierem. 6. Ezech.
36.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn9"></a><i><a href="#amn9">[i]</a>: Examples what teachers
oght to do in this time.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn10"></a><i><a href="#amn10">[j]</a>: Ezech. 2, Apoca. 6.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn11"></a><i><a href="#amn11">[k]</a>: Thre chef reasons, that
do stay man from speaking the truthe.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn12"></a><i><a href="#amn12">[l]</a>: 1. Cor. 9.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn13"></a><i><a href="#amn13">[m]</a>: Mat. 26. Act. 18, 21.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn14"></a><i><a href="#amn14">[n]</a>: Psalm. 2. Act. 4.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn15"></a><i><a href="#amn15">[o]</a>: It is necessarie for
everie man to open the impietie, whiche he knoweth to hurt his commonwelth.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn16"></a><i><a href="#amn16">[p]</a>: No man can repent except
he knowe his synne.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>To such as thinke that it will be long before such doctrine come to
the eares of the chief offenders, I answer that the veritie of God is of
that nature, that at one time or at other, it will pourchace to it selfe
audience. It is an odour and smell, that can not be suppressed<a NAME="amn17"></a><sup><a href="#mn17">[q]</a></sup>,
yea it is a trumpet that will sound in despite of the aduersarie. It will
compell the verie ennemies to their own confusion, to tes tifie and beare
witnesse of it. For I finde that the prophecie and preaching of Heliseus
was declared in the hall of the king of Syria by the seruantes and flatterers
of the same wicked king<a NAME="amn18"></a><sup><a href="#mn18">[r]</a></sup>,
making mention that Heliseus declared to the king of Israel, what so euer
the said king of Syria spake in his most secret chamber. And the wonderous
workes of Iesus Christ were notified to Herode<a NAME="amn19"></a><sup><a href="#mn19">[s]</a></sup>,
not in any greate praise or commendation of his doctrine, but rather to
signifie that Christ called that tyranne a fox: and that he did no more
regarde his authoritie then did Iohn the Baptist, whom Herode before had
beheaded for the libertie of his tonge. But whether the bearers of the
rumors and tidinges were fauourers of Christ or flatterers of the tyranne,
certain it is that the fame, as well of Christes doctrine, as of his workes
came to the eares of Herod: euen so may the sounde of our weake trumpet,
by the support of some wynd (blowe it from the south or blowe it from the
northe it is no mater) come to the eares of the chief offenders. But whether
it do or not, yet dare we not cease to blowe as God will giue strength<a NAME="amn20"></a><sup><a href="#mn20">[t].</a></sup>
For we are debters to mo then to princes, to witte, to the multitude of
our brethren, of whome, no doubte a greate nomber haue here to fore offended
by errour and ignorance, geuing their suffragies, consent and helpe to
establishe women in their kingdomes and empires<a NAME="amn21"></a><sup><a href="#mn21">[u]</a></sup>,
not vnderstanding howe abominable, odious and detestable is all such vsurped
authoritie in the presence of God. And therfore must the truthe, be plainlie
spoken, that the simple and rude multitude may be admonished.</td>

<td><a NAME="mn17"></a><i><a href="#amn17">[q]</a>: The propertie of Goddes
truth.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn18"></a><i><a href="#amn18">[r]</a>: 2. Reg. 6.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn19"></a><i><a href="#amn19">[s]</a>: Mat. 14.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn20"></a><i><a href="#amn20">[t]</a>: Rum. 1.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn21"></a><i><a href="#amn21">[u]:</a> The ignorant multitide
hath set up the authoritie of women not knowinge the danger.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td WIDTH="85%"><a NAME="kingobj"></a>And as concerning the danger, which
may hereof insue, I am not altogether so brutishe and insensible, but that
I haue laid mine accompt what the finishinge of the worke may coste me
for mine own parte. First, I am not ignorant howe difficile and dangerous
it is to speake against a common error<a NAME="amn22"></a><sup><a href="#mn22">[v]</a></sup>,
especiallie when that the ambitious mindes of men and women are called
to the obedience of goddes simple commandement. For to the most parte of
'men, laufull and godlie appeareth, what soeuer antiquitie hath receiued.
And secondarilie, I looke to haue mine aduersaries not onlie of the ignorant
multitude, but also of the wise, politike, and quiet spirites of this worlde,
so that aswell shall suche as oght to mainteine the truth and veritie of
God become ennemies to me in this case, as shall the princes and ambitious
persons, who to mainteine their vniust tyrannie do alwayes studie to suppresse
the same. And thus I am most certeinlie persuaded, that my labour shall
not escape reprehension of many. But because I remembre that accomptes<a NAME="amn23"></a><sup><a href="#mn23">[w]</a></sup>
of the talentes receiued must be made to him, who nether respecteth the
multitude, nether yet approueth the wisdome, policie, peace, nor antiquitie,
concluding or determining any thinge against his eternall will reueled
to vs in his moste blessed worde, I am compelled to couer myne eyes, and
shut vp myne eares, that I nether se the multitude, that shall withstand
me in this mater, nether that I shall heare the opprobries, nor consider
the dangers, which I may incurre for vttering the same. I shalbe called
foolishe, curious, despitefull, and a sower of sedition: and one day parchance
(althogh now I be nameles) I may be attainted of treason. But seing that
impossible it is[<a NAME="amn24"></a><sup><a href="#mn24">[x]</a></sup>,
but that ether I shall offend God, dailie calling to my conscience, that
I oght to manifest the veritie knowen, or elles that I shall displease
the worlde for doing the same, I haue determined to obey God, not withstanding
that the world shall rage therat. I knowe that the world offended (by Goddes
permission) may kill the bodie, but Goddes maiestie offended, hath power
to punishe bodie and soule for euer. His maiestie is offended, when that
his preceptes are contemned, and his threatninges estemed to be of none
effect. And amongest his manifold preceptes geuen to his prophetes, and
amongest his threatninges, none is more vehement, then is that, which is
pronounced to Ezechiel in these wordes<a NAME="amn25"></a><sup><a href="mn25">[y]</a></sup>:
Sonne of man, I haue appointed the a watchman to the house of Israel, that
thou shuldest heare from my mouthe the worde, and that thou maist admonishe
them plainlie, when I shall say to the wicked man: O wicked, thou shalt
assuredlie die. Then if thou shalt not speake, that thou maist plainlie
admonishe him, that he may leaue his wicked way, the wicked man shall die
in his iniquitie, but his blood will I requier of thy hand. But and if
thou shalt plainlie admonishe the wicked man, and yet he shall not turne
from his way, such a one shall die in his iniquitie, but thou hast deliuered
thy soule.</td>

<td><a NAME="mn22"></a><i><a href="#amn22">[v]:</a> <a href="#aansobj">A
very dangerous thing to speake against olde errors.</a></i>
<p><a NAME="mn23"></a><i><a href="#amn23">[w]</a>: Accomptes will be had
of Goddes giftes.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn24"></a><i><a href="#amn24">[x]</a>: The cause mouing the
author to write.</i>
<p><a NAME="mn25"></a><i><a href="#amn25">[y]</a>: Ezech. 33.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>This precept, I say, with the threatning annexed, togither with the
rest, that is spoken in the same chapter, not to Ezechiel onlie, but to
euerie one, whom God placeth whatchman ouer his people and flocke, (and
watchman are they whose eyes he doth open, and whose conscience he pricketh
to admonishe the vngodlie) compelleth me to vtter my conscience in this
mater, notwithstanding that the hole worlde shuld be offended with me for
so doing. Yf any wonder, why I do concele my name, let him be assured,
that the feare of corporall punishement is nether the onlie, nether the
chef cause. My purpose is thrise to blowe the trumpet in the same mater,
if God so permitte<a NAME="amn26"></a><sup><a href="#mn26">[z]</a></sup>:
twise I intende to do it without name, but at the last blast, to take the
blame vpon my selfe, that all others may be purged.</td>

<td><a NAME="mn26"></a><i><a href="#amn26">[z]</a>: For the Authors name.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>
<hr width="100%">
<h1>
<a NAME="first blast"></a><a href="#ablast">THE FIRST BLAST TO AWAKE WOMEN
DEGENERATE.</a></h1>
</td>

<td></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>To promote a woman to beare rule, superioritie, dominion or empire
aboue any realme, nation, or citie, is repugnant to nature, contumelie
to God, a thing most contrarious to his reueled will and approued ordinance,
and finallie it is the subuersion of good order, of all equitie and iustice</td>

<td></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>In the probation of this proposition, I will not be so curious, as
to gather what soeuer may amplifie, set furth, or decore the same, but
I am purposed, euen as I haue spoken my conscience in most plaine and fewe
wordes, so to stand content with a simple proofe of euerie membre, bringing
in for my witnesse Goddes ordinance in nature, his plaine will reueled
in his worde, and the mindes of such as be moste auncient amongest godlie
writers.</td>

<td></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>And first, where that I affirme the empire of a woman to be a thing
repugnant to nature, I meane not onlie that God by the order of his creation
hath spoiled woman of authoritie and dominion, but also that man hath seen,
proued and pronounced iust causes why that it so shuld be. Man, I say,
in many other cases blind, doth in this behalfe see verie clearlie. For
the causes be so manifest, that they can not be hid. For who can denie
but it repugneth to nature, that the blind shal be appointed to leade and
conduct such as do see? That the weake, the sicke, and impotent persones<a NAME="an1"></a><sup><a href="#n1">[1]</a></sup>shall
norishe and kepe the hole and strong, and finallie, that the foolishe,
madde and phrenetike shal gouerne the discrete, and giue counsel to such
as be sober of mind? And such be al women, compared vnto man in bearing
of authoritie. For their sight in ciuile regiment, is but blindnes: their
strength, weaknes: their counsel, foolishenes: and iudgement, phrenesie,
if it be rightlie considered.</td>

<td><a NAME="n1"></a><i><a href="#an1">[1]</a>: Causes why women shuld
not have preeminence ouer men.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>I except such as God by singular priuiledge, and for certein causes
knowen onlie to him selfe, hath exempted from the common ranke of women<a NAME="an2"></a><sup><a href="#n2">[2]</a></sup>,
and do speake of women as nature and experience do this day declare them.
Nature I say, doth paynt them furthe to be weake, fraile, impacient, feble
and foolishe: and experience hath declared them to be vnconstant, variable,
cruell and lacking the spirit of counsel and regiment. And these notable
faultes haue men in all ages espied in that kinde, for the whiche not onlie
they haue remoued women from rule and authoritie, but also some haue thoght
that men subiect to the counsel or empire of their wyues were vn worthie
of all publike office. For this writeth Aristotle in the seconde of his
Politikes<a NAME="an3"></a><sup><a href="#n3">[3]</a></sup>: what difference
shal we put, saith he, whether that women beare authoritie, or the husbanesd
that obey the empire of their wyues be appointed to be magistrates? For
what insueth the one, must nedes folowe the other, to witte, iniustice,
confusion and disorder. The same author further reasoneth, that the policie
or regiment of the Lacedemonians (who other wayes amongest the Grecians
were moste excellent) was not worthie to be reputed nor accompted amongest
the nombre of common welthes, that were well gouerned, because the magistrates,
and rulers of the same were to [o] muche geuen to please and obey their
wyues. What wolde this writer (I pray you) haue said to that realme or
nation, where a woman sitteth crowned in parliament amongest the middest
of men. Oh fearefull and terrible are thy iudgementes<a NAME="an4"></a><sup><a href="#n4">[4]</a></sup>
(o Lord) whiche thus hast abased man for his iniquitie! I am assuredlie
persuaded that if any of those men, which illuminated onelie by the light
of nature, did see and pronounce causes sufficient, why women oght not
to beare rule nor authoritie, shuld this clay liue and see a woman sitting
in iudgement, or riding frome parliament in the middest of men, hauing
the royall crowne vpon her head, the sworde and sceptre borne before her,
in signe that the administration of iustice was in her power: I am assuredlie
persuaded, I say, that suche a sight shulde so astonishe them, that they
shuld iudge the hole worlde to be transformed into Amazones<a NAME="an5"></a><sup><a href="#n5">[5]</a></sup>,
and that suche a metamorphosis and change was made of all the men of that
countrie, as poetes do feyn was made of the companyons of Vlisses, or at
least, that albeit the owtwarde form of men remained, yet shuld they iudge
that their hartes were changed frome the wisdome, vnderstanding, and courage
of men, to the foolishe fondnes and cowardise of women. Yea they further
shuld pronounce, that where women reigne or be in authoritie, that there
must nedes vanitie be preferred to vertue, ambition and pride to temperancie
and modestie, and finallie, that auarice the mother of all mischefe must
nedes deuour equitie and iustice. But lest that we shall seme to be of
this opinion alone<a NAME="an6"></a><sup><a href="#n6">[6]</a></sup>, let
vs heare what others haue seen and decreed in this mater. In the rules
of the lawe thus it is written<a NAME="an7"></a><sup><a href="#n7">[7]</a></sup>:
Women are remoued from all ciuile and publike office<a NAME="an8"></a><sup><a href="#n8">[8]</a></sup>,
so that they nether may be iudges, nether may they occupie the place of
the magistrate, nether yet may they be speakers for others. The same is
repe[a]ted in the third and in the sextenth bokes of the digestes<a NAME="an9"></a><sup><a href="#n9">[9]</a></sup>:
Where certein persones are forbidden, Ne pro aliis postulent, that is,
that they be no speakers nor aduocates for others. And among the rest are
women forbidden, and this cause is added, that they do not against shamefastnes
intermedle them selues with the causes of others<a NAME="an10"></a><sup><a href="#n10">[10]</a></sup>,
nether yet that women presume to vse the offices due to men. The lawe in
the same place doth further declare, that a naturall shamfastnes oght to
be in womankind<a NAME="an11"></a><sup><a href="#n11">[11]</a></sup>, whiche
most certeinlie she loseth, when soeuer she taketh vpon her the office
and estate of man. As in Calphurnia<a NAME="an12"></a><sup><a href="#n12">[12]
</a></sup>was
euidentlie declared, who hauing licence to speake before the senate, at
length became so impudent and importune, that by her babling she troubled
the hole assemblie. And so gaue occasion that this lawe was established.</td>

<td><a NAME="n2"></a><i><a href="#an2">[2]</a>: Priuate example do not
breake the generall ordinance.</i>
<p><a NAME="n3"></a><i><a href="#an3">[3]</a>: 2 Politicorum Aristotelis.</i>
<p><a NAME="n4"></a><i><a href="#an4">[4]:</a> Reade Isaie the thirde chaptre.</i>
<p><a NAME="n5"></a><i><a href="#an5">[5]</a>: Amazones were monstruouse
women, that coulde not abide the regiment of men, and therfore killed their
husbandes, reade Iustine.</i>
<p><a NAME="n6"></a><i><a href="#an6">[6]</a>: Arist. 2. Politic.</i>
<p><a NAME="n7"></a><i><a href="#an7">[7]</a>: Lib. 50. de regulis iuris.</i>
<p><a NAME="n8"></a><i><a href="#an8">[8]</a>: What women may not be.</i>
<p><a NAME="n9"></a><i><a href="#an9">[9]:</a> 3. 16. lib. Digestorum.</i>
<p><a NAME="n10"></a><i><a href="#an10">[10]</a>: Ad Senatus consul, Veleianum.</i>
<p><a NAME="n11"></a><i><a href="#an11">[11]:</a> Lib. 3. de posulationse
Tit. 1.</i>
<p><a NAME="n12"></a><i><a href="#an12">[12]</a>: Calphurnia.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td WIDTH="85%">In the first boke of the digestes<a NAME="an13"></a><sup><a href="#n13">[13]</a></sup>,
it is pronounced that the condition of the woman in many cases is worse
then of the man. As in iurisdiction (saith the lawe<a NAME="an14"></a><sup><a href="#n14">[14]</a></sup>)
in receiuing of care and tuition, in adoption, in publike accusation, in
delation, in all populat action, and in motherlie power, which she hath
not vpon her owne sonnes. The lawe further will not permit, that the woman
geue any thing to her husband, because it is against the nature of her
kinde, being the inferiour membre to presume to geue any thing to her head<a NAME="an15"></a><sup><a href="#n15">[15]</a></sup>.
The lawe doth more ouer pronounce womankinde to be the most auaricious<a NAME="an16"></a><sup><a href="#n16">[16]</a></sup>
(which is a vice intolerable in those that shulde rule or minister iustice).
And Aristotle<a NAME="an17"></a><sup><a href="#n17">[17]</a></sup>, as
before is touched, doth plainly affirme, that wher soeuer women beare dominion,
there must nedes the people be disorded, liuinge and abounding in all intemperancie,
geuen to pride, excesse, and vanitie. And finallie in the end, that they
must nedes come to confusion and ruine<a NAME="an18"></a><sup><a href="#n18">[18].</a></sup>
<p>Wold to god the examples were not so manifest, to the further declaration
of the imperfections of women<a NAME="an19"></a><sup><a href="#n19">[19]</a></sup>,
of their naturall weaknes, and inordinat appetites. I might adduce histories,
prouing some women to haue died for sodein ioy, some for vnpaciencie to
haue murthered them selues, some to haue burned with such inordinat lust,
that for the quenching of the same, they haue betrayed<a NAME="an20"></a><sup><a href="#n20">[20]</a></sup>
to strangiers their countrie and citie: and some to haue bene so desirous
of dominion, that for the obteining of the same, they haue murthered the
children of their owne sonnes. Yea and some haue killed with crueltie their
owne husbandes<a NAME="an21"></a><sup><a href="#n21">[21]</a></sup> and
children. But to me it is sufficient (because this parte of nature is not
my moste sure foundation) to haue proued<a NAME="an22"></a><sup><a href="#n22">[22]</a></sup>,
that men illuminated onlie by the light of nature, haue seen and haue determined,
that it is a thing moste repugnant to nature, that women rule and gouerne
ouer men. For those that will not permit a woman to haue power ouer her
owne sonnes, will not permit her (I am assured) to haue rule ouer a realme<a NAME="an23"></a><sup><a href="#n23">[23]</a></sup>:
and those that will not suffer her to speake in defense of those that be
accused, nether that will admit her accusation intended against man, will
not approuel her, that she shal sit in iudgement crowned with the royal
crowne, vsurping authoritie in the middest of men. But now to the second
part of nature: In the whiche I include the reueled will and perfect ordinance
of God, and against this parte of nature, I say, that it doth manifestlie
repugne that any woman shal reigne or beare dominion ouer man. For God
first by the order of his creation, and after by the curse and malediction
pronounced against the woman, by the, reason of her rebellion, hath pronounced
the contrarie. First, I say, that woman in her greatest perfection, was
made to serue and obey man<a NAME="an24"></a><sup><a href="#n24">[24]</a></sup>,
not to rule and command him:&nbsp;<a NAME="an25"></a><sup><a href="#n25">[25]</a></sup>
As saint Paule doth reason in these wordes. Man is not of the woman but
the woman of the man. And man was not created for the cause of the woman,
but the woman for the cause of man, and therfore oght the woman to haue
a power vpon her head (that is a couerture in signe of subiection). Of
whiche words it is plaine that the Apostle meaneth, that woman in her greatest
perfection shuld haue knowen, that man was Lord aboue her: and therfore
that she shulde neuer haue pretended any kind of superioritie aboue him,
no more then do the angels aboue God the creator<a NAME="an26"></a><sup><a href="#n26">[26]</a></sup>,
or aboue Christ Iesus their head. So, I say, that in her greatest perfection
woman was created to be subiect to man: But after her fall and rebellion
committed against God, their was put vpon her a newe necessitie, and she
was made subiect to man by the irreuocable sentence of God, pronounced
in these wordes<a NAME="an27"></a><sup><a href="#n27">[27]</a></sup>: I
will greatlie multiplie thy sorowe and thy conception. With sorowe shalt
thou beare thy children, and thy will shall be subiect to thy man: and
he shal beare dominion ouer the. Herebie may such as altogither be not
blinded plainlie see, that God, by his sentence, hath deiected all woman
frome empire and dominion aboue man. For two punishmentes are laid vpon
her, to witte, a dolor, anguishe and payn, as oft as euer she shal be mother;
and a subiection of her selfe, her appetites and will, to her husband,
and to his will. Frome the former parte of this malediction can nether
arte, nobilitie, policie, nor lawe made by man, deliuer womankinde, but
who soeuer atteineth to that honour to be mother, proueth in experience
the effect and strength of goddes word. But (alas) ignorance of God, ambition,
and tyrannie haue studied to abolishe and destroy the second parte of Goddes
punishment. For women are lifted vp to be heades ouer realmes, and to rule
aboue men at their pleasure and appetites. But horrible is the vengeance,
which is prepared for the one and for the other, for the promoters, and
for the persones promoted, except they spedelie repent. For they shall
be deiected from the glorie of the sonnes of God<a NAME="an28"></a><sup><a href="#n28">[28]</a></sup>,
to the sclauerie of the deuill, and to the torment that is prepared for
all suche, as do exalte them selues against God. Against God can nothing
be more manifest, then that a woman shall be exalted to reigne aboue man.
For the contrarie sentence hath he pronounced in these wordes<a NAME="an29"></a><sup><a href="#n29">[29]:</a></sup>
Thy will shall be subiect to thy husband, and he shall beare dominion ouer
the. As God shuld say: forasmuch as thou hast abused thy former condition,
and because thy free will hath broght thy selfe and mankind in to: the
bondage of Satan, I therfore will bring the in bondage to man. For where
before, thy obedience shuld haue bene voluntarie, nowe it shall be by constraint
and by neeessitie: and that because thou hast deceiued thy man, thou shalt
therfore be no longar maistresse ouer thine own appetites, ouer thine owne
will nor desires. For in the there is nether reason nor discretion, whiche
be able to moderate thy affections, and therfore they shall, be subiect
to the desire of thy man. He shall be Lord and gouernour, not onlie ouer
thy bodie, but euen ouer thy appetites and will. This sentence, I say,
did God pronounce against Heua, and her daughters, as the rest of the Scriptures
doth euidentlie witnesse. So that no woman can euer presume to reigne aboue
man, but the same she must nedes do in despite, of God, and in contempt
of. his punishment, and maledictjon<a NAME="an30"></a><sup><a href="#n30">[30]</a></sup>.</td>

<td><a NAME="n13"></a><i><a href="#an13">[13]</a>: De statu homino Titul.
8. Frome women.</i>
<p><a NAME="n14"></a><i><a href="#an14">[14]</a>: power is taken away by
the Ciuile lawe ouer their own children.</i>
<p><a NAME="n15"></a><i><a href="#an15">[15]</a>: Dig. lib. 24. de donatione
inter virum et foeminane.</i>
<p><a NAME="n16"></a><i><a href="#an16">[16]</a>: women be couetous therefore
vnmete gouernors.</i>
<p><a NAME="n17"></a><i><a href="#an17">[17]</a>: Lib. 1. Digest. de le
gib. et senatuscon Titul. 3, Politic. 2.</i>
<p><a NAME="n18"></a><i><a href="#an18">[18]</a>: England and Scotland
beware.</i>
<p><a NAME="n19"></a><i><a href="#an19">[19]:</a> Great imperfections of
women.</i>
<p><a NAME="n20"></a><i><a href="#an20">[20]</a>: Ronsilda the wife of
Gisulphus betrayed to Cacanus the dukedome of friaul in Italie.</i>
<p><a NAME="n21"></a><i><a href="#an21">[21]</a>: Iane quene of Naples
hanged her husband.</i>
<p><a NAME="n21"></a><i><a href="#an22">[22]</a>: Athalia, 4. Reg. II.
Hurene, Anton. Sabell.</i>
<p><a NAME="n23"></a><i><a href="#an23">[23]</a>: If the lesse thinges
be denied to women, the greater cannot be granted.</i>
<p><a NAME="n24"></a><i><a href="#an24">[24]</a>: woman in her greatest
perfection was made to serue man.</i>
<p><a NAME="n25"></a><i><a href="#an25">[25]</a>: I. Cor. II.</i>
<p><a NAME="n26"></a><i><a href="#an26">[26]</a>: A good comparison.</i>
<p><a NAME="n27"></a><i><a href="#an27">[27]</a>: A newe necessity of womans
subiection. woman by the sentence of God, subiect to man. Gene. 3.</i>
<p><a NAME="n28"></a><i><a href="#an28">[28]</a>: The punishment of women
unjustlie promoted and of their promoters.</i>
<p><a NAME="n29"></a><i><a href="#an29">[29]</a>: Gene. 3.</i>
<p><a NAME="n30"></a><i><a href="#an30">[30]</a>: Let all women take hede.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td><a NAME="degenobj"></a>I am not ignorant, that the most part of men
do vnderstand this malediction of the subiection of the wife to her husband,
and of the dominion, which; he beareth aboue her<a NAME="an31"></a><sup><a href="#n31">[31]</a></sup>:
but the holie ghost geueth to vs an other interpretation of this place,
taking from all women all. kinde of superioritie, authoritie and power
ouer man, speaking as foloweth, by the mouth of saint Paule<a NAME="an32"></a><sup><a href="#n32">[32].</a></sup>
I suffer not a woman to teache, nether yet to vsurpe authoritie aboue man.
Here he nameth women in generall, excepting none, affirming that she may
vsurpe authoritie aboue no man. And that he speaketh more plainly, in an
other place in these wordes<a NAME="an33"></a><sup><a href="#n33">[33]</a></sup>:
Let women kepe silence in the congregation, for it is not permitted to
them to speake, but to be subiect as the lawe sayeth. These two testimonies
of the holy ghost, be sufficient to proue what soeuer we haue affirmed
before, and to represse the inordinate pride of women, as also to correct
the foolishnes of those that haue studied to exalt women in authoritie
aboue man, against God, and against his sentence pronounced. But that the
same two places of the apostle may the better he vnderstand: it is to be
noted, that in the latter, which is writen in the first epistle to the
Corinthes the 14. chapitre, before the apostle had permitted that all persones
shuld prophecie one after an other: addinge this reason: 'that all may
learne and all may receiue consolation'. And lest that any might haue iudged,
that amongest a rude multitude, and the pluralitie of speakers, manie,
thinges litle to purpose might haue bene affirmed, or elles that some confusion
might haue risen: he addeth, the spirites of the prophetes are subiect
to the prophetes: As he shuld say, God shall alwayes raise vp some, to
whome the veritie shalbe reueled, and vnto such ye shal geue place, albeit
they sit in the lowest seates. And thus the apostle wold haue prophecying
an exercise to be free to the hole churche, that euerie one shuld communicate
with the congregation, what God had reueled to them, prouidinge that it
were orderlie done. But frome this generall priuiledge he secludeth all
woman, sayinge: let women kepe silence in the congregation. And why I pray
you? was it because that the apostle thoght no woman to haue any knowledge?
no he geueth an other reason, saying; let her be subiect as the lawe saith<a NAME="an34"></a><sup><a href="#n34">[34]</a></sup>.
In which wordes is first to be noted, that the apostle calleth this former
sentence pronounced against woman a lawe, that is, the immutable decree
of God, who by his owne voice hath subiected her to one membre of the congregation<a NAME="an35"></a><sup><a href="#n35">[35]</a></sup>,
that is to her husband, wherupon the holie ghost concludeth, that she may
neuer rule nor bear empire ahoue man. For she that is made subiect to one,
may neuer be preferred to many, and that the holie ghoste doth manifestlie
expresse, saying: I suffer not that women vsurpe authoritie aboue man:
he sayth not, I will not, that woman vsurpe authoritie aboue her husband,
but he'nameth man in generall, taking frome her all power and authoritie,
to speake, to reason, to interprete, or to teache, but principallie to
rule or to iudge in the assemblie of men. So that woman by the lawe of
God, and by the interpretation of the holy ghost, is vtterly forbidden
to occupie the place of God in the offices afore said, which he hath assigned
to man, whome he hath appointed and ordeined his lieutenant in earth: secluding
frome that honor and dignitie all woman, as this short argument shall euidentlie
declare.</td>

<td><a NAME="n31"></a><i><a href="#an31">[31]:</a> Answer to an obiection.</i>
<p><a NAME="n32"></a><i><a href="#an32">[32]</a>: 1 Tim. 2.</i>
<p><a NAME="n33"></a><i><a href="#an33">[33]</a>: I. Cor. 14.</i>
<p><a NAME="n34"></a><i><a href="#an34">[34]:</a> From a general privilege
is woman secluded.</i>
<p><a NAME="n35"></a><i><a href="#an35">[35]</a>: She that is, subject
to one may not rule many.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>The apostle taketh power frome all woman to speake in the assemblie<a NAME="an36"></a><sup><a href="#n36">[36]</a></sup>.
Ergo he permitteth no woman to rule aboue man. The former parteis euident,
whereupon doth the conclusion of necessitie folowe. For he that taketh
from woman the least parte of authoritie<a NAME="an37"></a><sup><a href="#n37">[37]</a></sup>,
dominion or rule, will not permit vnto her that whiche is greatest: But
greater it is to reigne aboue realmes and nations, to publish and to make
lawes, and to commande men of all estates, and finallie to appoint iudges
and ministers, then to speake in the congregation. For her iudgement, sentence,
or opinion proposed in the congregation, may be iudged by all, may be corrected
by the learned, and reformed by the godlie. But woman being promoted in
souereine authoritie, her lawes must be obeyed, her opinion folowed, and
her tyrannic mainteined: supposing that it be expreslie against God, and
the prophet [profit] of the common welth, as to[o] manifest experience
doth this day witnesse. And therfore yet againe I repete that, whiche before
I haue affirmed: to witt, that a woman promoted to sit in the seate of
God, that is, to teache, to iudge or to reigne aboue man, is amonstre in
nature, contumelie to God, and a thing most repugnant to his will and ordinance.
For he hath depriued them as before is proued, of speakinge in the congregation,
and hath expreslie forbidden them to vsurpe any kinde of authoritie aboue
man. Howe then will he suffer them to reigne and haue empire aboue realmes
and nations? He will neuer, I say, approue it, because it is a thing most
repugnant to his perfect ordinance, as after shalbe declared, and as the
former scriptures haue plainlie geuen testimonie. To the whiche, to adde
any thing were superfluous, were it not that the worlde is almost nowe
comen to that blindnes, that what soeuer pleaseth not the princes and the
multitude, the same is reiected as doctrine newelie forged, and is condemned,
for heresie. I haue therfore thoght good to recite the mindes of some auncient
writers in the same mater, to the end that suche as altogither be not blinded
by the deuil, may consider and vnderstand this my iudgement to be no newe
interpretation of Goddes scriptures, but to be the vniforme consent of
the most parte of godlie writers, since the time of the apostles. Tertullian<a NAME="an38"></a><sup><a href="#n38">[38]</a></sup>
in his boke of womens apparell, after that he hath shewed many causes why
gorgious apparell is abominable and odiouse in a woman, addeth these wordes,
speaking as it were to euery woman by name: Dost thou not knowe (saith
he) that thou art Heua? the sentence of God liueth and is effectuall against
this kind, and in this worlde of necessity it is, that the punishment also
liue. Thou art the porte and gate of the deuil. Thou art the first transgressor
of goddes law. thou diddest persuade and easely deceiue him whome the deuil
durst not assault<a NAME="an39"></a><sup><a href="#n39">[39]</a></sup>.
For thy merit (that is for thy death) it behoued the son of god to suffre
the death, and doth it yet abide in thy mind to decke the aboue thy skin
coates? By these and many other graue sentences, and quicke interrogations,
did this godlie writer labour to bring euerie woman in contemplation of
her selfe, to the end that euerie one depelie weying, what sentence God
had pronounced against the hole race and doughters of Heua, might not onely
learne daily to humble and subiect them selues in the presence of God,
but also that they shulde auoide and abhorre what soeuer thing might exalte
them or puffe them vp in pride, or that might be occasion, that they shuld
forget the curse and malediction of God. And what, I pray you, is more
able to cause woman to forget her owne condition, then if she be lifted
vp in authoritie aboue man? It is a thingverie difficile to a man, (be
he neuer so constant) promoted to honors, not to be tickled some what with
pride (for the winde of vaine glorie doth easelie carie vp the drie dust
of the earth). But as for woman<a NAME="an40"></a><sup><a href="#n40">[40]</a></sup>,
it is no more possible, that she being set aloft in authoritie aboue man,
shall resist the motions of pride, then it is able to the weake reed, or
to the turning wethercocke, not to bowe or turne at the vehemencie of the
vnconstant wind. And therfore the same writer expreslie forbiddeth all
woman to intremedle with the office of man. For thus he writeth in his
book de virginibus velandis<a NAME="an41"></a><sup><a href="#n41">[41]</a></sup>:
It is not permitted to a woman, to speake in the congregation, nether to
teache, nether to baptise, nether to vendicate to her selfe any office
of man. The same he speaketh yet more plainly in the preface of his sixte
boke writen against Marcion<a NAME="an42"></a><sup><a href="#n42">[42]</a></sup>,
where he recounting certain monstruous thinges, whiche were to be sene
at the sea called Euxinum, amongest the rest, he reciteth this as a greate
monstre in nature, that women in those partes, were not tamed nor embased
by consideration of their own sex and kind: but that all shame laide a
parte, they made expenses vpon weapons and learned the feates of warre,
hauinge more pleasure to fight, then to mary and be subiect to man. Thus
farre of Tertullian, whose wordes be so plain, that they nede no explanation.
For he that taketh from her all office apperteining to man, will not suffre
her to reigne aboue man: and he that iudgeth it a monstre in nature, that
a woman shall exercise weapons, must iudge it to be a monstre of monstres,
that a woman shalbe exalted aboue a hole realme and nation. Of the same
minde is Origen, and diuers others. Yea euen till the dayes of Augustine,
whose sentences I omit to auoide prolixitie.</td>

<td><a NAME="n36"></a><i><a href="#an36">[36]</a>: A strong argument.</i>
<p><a NAME="n37"></a><i><a href="#an37">[37]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n38"></a><i><a href="#an38">[38]</a>: Tertullian de habitu
mulierum.</i>
<p><a NAME="n39"></a><i><a href="#an39">[39]</a>: Let women hearken what
Tertullian an olde Docto saith.</i>
<p><a NAME="n40"></a><i><a href="#an40">[40]:</a> NOTE</i>
<p><a NAME="n41"></a><i><a href="#an41">[41]</a>: Tertull, lib 8. de virginilis
verlandis.</i>
<p><a NAME="n42"></a><i><a href="#an42">[42]</a>: In pro&aelig;mio 6. lib.
contra Marcionem.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>Augustine in his 22. boke writen against Faustus<a NAME="an43"></a><sup><a href="#n43">[43]</a></sup>,
proueth that a woman oght to serue her husband as vnto God: affirming that
in no thing hath woman equall power with man, sauing that nether of both
haue power ouer their owne bodies. By whiche he wold plainlie conclude,
that a woman oght neuer to pretend nor thirst for that power and authoritie
which is due to man. For so he doth explane him selfe in an other place<a NAME="an44"></a><sup><a href="#n44">[44]</a></sup>,
affirming that woman oght to be repressed and brideled be times, if she
aspire to any dominion: alledging that dangerous and perillous it is to
suffre her to procede, althogh it be in temporall and corporall thinges.
And therto he addeth these wordes: God seeth not for a time, nether is
there any newe thinge in his sight and knowledge, meaninge therby, that
what God hath sene in one woman (as concerning dominion and bearing of
authoritie) the same he seeth in all. And what he hath forbidden to one,
the same he also forbiddeth to all. And this most euidentlie yet in an
other place he writeth, mouing this question: howe can woman be the image
of God, seing (saith he<a NAME="an45"></a><sup><a href="#n45">[45]</a></sup>)
she is subiect to man, and hath none authoritie, nether to teache, nether
to be witnesse, nether to iudge, muche lesse to rule, or beare empire?
These be the verie wordes of Augustine, of which it is euident that this
godlie writer<a NAME="an46"></a><sup><a href="#n46">[46]</a></sup>, doth
not onelie agree withe Tertullian before recited, but also with the former
sentence of the lawe, whiche taketh frome woman not onelie all authoritie
amongest men, but also euerie office apperteining to man. To the question
howe she can be the image of God, he answereth as foloweth. Woman (saith
he) compared to other creatures is the image of God, for she beareth dominion
ouer them: but compared vnto man, she may not be called the image of God,
for she beareth not rule and lordship ouer man, but oght to obey him &amp;c.
And howe that woman oght to obey man, he speaketh yet more clearlie in
these words: the woman shalbe subiect to man as vnto Christ. For woman
(saith he<a NAME="an47"></a><sup><a href="#n47">[47]</a></sup>) hath not
her example frome the bodie and from the fleshe, that so she shalbe subiect
to man, as the fleshe is vnto the spirite. Because that the flesh in the
weaknes and mortalitie of this life, lusteth and striueth against the spirit,
and therfore wold not the holie ghost geue example of subiection to the
woman of any suche thing &amp;c. This sentence of Augustine oght to be
noted of all women, for in it he plainlie affirmeth, that woman oght to
be subiect to man, that she neuer oght, more to desire preeminence aboue
him, then that she oght to desire aboue Christe Iesus. With Augustine agreeth
in euerie point S. Ambrose, who thus writeth in his Hexaemeron<a NAME="an48"></a><sup><a href="#n48">[48]</a></sup>:
Adam was deceiued by Heua, and not Heua by Adam, and therfore iust it is,
that woman receiue and acknowledge him for gouernor whom she called to
sinne, lest that again she slide and fall by womanlie facilitie. And writing
vpon the epistle to the Ephesians<a NAME="an49"></a><sup><a href="#n49">[49]</a></sup>,
he saith: let women be subiect to their owne husbandes as vnto the Lorde:
for the man is heade to the woman, and Christ is heade to the congregation,
and he is the sauiour of the bodie: but the congregation is subiect to
Christ, euen so oght women to be to their husbandes in all thing-es. He
procedeth further saying: women are commanded to be subiect to men by the
lawe of nature, because that man is the author or beginner of the woman:
for as Christ is the head of the churche, so is man of the woman. From
Christ, the church toke beginning, and therfore it is subiect vnto him:
euen so did woman take beginning from man, that she shuld be subiect. Thus
we heare the agreing of these two writers to be such, that a man might
iudge the one to haue stolen the wordes and sentences from the other. And
yet plain it is, that duringe the time of their writinge, the one was farre
distant frome the other. But the holie ghost, who is the spirite of Concorde
and vnitie, did so illuminate their hartes, and directe their tonges, and
pennes, that as they did conceiue and vnderstand one truth, so did they
pronounce and vtter the same, leauing a testimonie of their knowledge and
Concorde to vs their posteritia. If any thinke that all these former sentences,
be spoken onelie of the subiection of the maryed woman to her husband,
as before I haue proued the contrarie, by the plain wordes and reasoning
of S. Paule, so shal I shortlie do the same, by other testimonies of the
forsaid writers. The same Ambrose writing vpon the second chapitre of the
first epistle to Timothie<a NAME="an50"></a><sup><a href="#n50">[50]</a></sup>,
after he hath spoken much of the simple arrayment of women: he addeth these
wordes: woman oght not onelie to haue simple arrayment, but all authoritie
is to be denied vnto her: for she must be in subiection to man (of whome
she hath taken her originall) aswell in habit as in seruice. And after
a fewe wordes he saith: because that death did entre in to the world by
her, there is no boldenes that oght to be permitted vnto her, but she oght
to be in humilitie. Hereof it is plain, that frome all woman, be she maried
or vnmaried, is all authoritie taken to execute any office, that apperteineth
to man. Yea plain it is that all woman is commanded, to serue, to be in
humilitie and subiection. Whiche thing yet speaketh the same writer, more
plainlie in these wordes<a NAME="an51"></a><sup><a href="#n51">[51]</a></sup>.
It is not permitted to women to speake, but to be in silence, as the lawe
saith<a NAME="an52"></a><sup><a href="#n52">[52]</a></sup>. What saith
the lawe? Vnto 'thy husband, shall thy conuersion be, and he shall beare
dominion ouer the'. This is a speciall lawe (saith Ambrose) whose sentence,
lest it shulde be violated, infirmed, or made weake, women are commanded
to be in silence. Here he includeth all women. And yet he procedeth further
in the same place saying<a NAME="an53"></a><sup><a href="#n53">[53]</a></sup>:
It is shame for them to presume to speake of the lawe in the house of the
Lord, who hath commanded them to be subiect to their men. But moste plainly
speaketh he writing vpon the 16. chapitre of the epistle of S. Paule to
the Romaines, vpon these wordes<a NAME="an54a"></a><sup><a href="#n54">[54a]:</a></sup>
Salute Rufus and his mother. For this cause (saith Ambrose) did the apostle
place Rufus before his mother, for the election of the administration of
the grace of God, in the whiche a woman hath no place. For he was chosen
and promoted by the Lorde, to take care ouer his busines, that is, ouer
the churche, to the whiche office could not his mother be appointed, albeit
she was a woman so, holie, that the apostle called her his mother. Hereof
it is plaine that the administration of the grace of God, is denied to
all woman. By the administration of Goddes grace, is vnderstand not onely
the preaching of the worde and administration of the sacramentes, by the
whiche the grace of God is presented and ordinarilie distributed vnto man,
but also the administration of ciuile iustice, by the whiche, vertue oght
to be mainteined, and vices punished. The execution wherof is no lesse
denied to woman, then is the preaching of the Euangile, or administration
of the sacramentes, as herafter shall most plainlie appeare.</td>

<td><a NAME="n43"></a><i><a href="#an43">[43]:</a> August. lib. 22. contra
Faustum, c.31.</i>
<p><a NAME="n44"></a><i><a href="#an44">[44]:</a> De Trinitat, lib. 12
cap. 7</i>
<p><a NAME="n45"></a><i><a href="#an45">[45]</a>: In quaect. veteris Testamenti,
quaest. 45.</i>
<p><a NAME="n46"></a><i><a href="#an46">[46]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n47"></a><i><a href="#an47">[47]</a>: Lib. de Continentia cap.
4.</i>
<p><a NAME="n48"></a><i><a href="#an48">[48]</a>: Ambros. in Hexaemero
lib. 5. c. 7.</i>
<p><a NAME="n49"></a><i><a href="#an49">[49]</a>: Cap. 5.</i>
<p><a NAME="n50"></a><i><a href="#an50">[50]</a>: Ambros. super. 2. c.
I epist. ad Timoth.</i>
<p><a NAME="n51"></a><i><a href="#an51">[51]</a>: Ambros. in I. epist.
ad Corin. cap. 14.</i>
<p><a NAME="n52"></a><i><a href="#an52">[52]</a>: Genes 3.</i>
<p><a NAME="n53"></a><i><a href="#an43">[53]</a>: whose house I pray you
ought the parliament house to be, Goddes or the deuilles?&nbsp;</i>
<p><a NAME="n54a"></a><i><a href="#an54a">[54a]</a>: Rufus is by S. Paul
saluted before his mother.</i>
<br>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>Chrysostome amongest the Grecian writers of no small credit, speaking
in rebuke of men, who in his dayes, were becdmen inferior to some women
in witt and in godlines, saith<a NAME="an54"></a><sup><a href="#n54">[54]</a></sup>:
for this cause was woman put vnder thy power (he speaketh to man in generall)
and thou wast pronounced Lorde ouer her, that she shulde obey the, and
that the head shuld not folowe the feet. But often it is, that we see the
contrary, that he who in his ordre oght to be the head, doth not kepe the
ordre of the feet (that is, doth not rule the feet) and that she, that
is in place of the foote, is constitute to be the head. He speaketh these
wordes as it were in admiration<a NAME="an55"></a><sup><a href="#n55">[55]</a></sup>,
that man was becomen so brutish, that he did not consider it to be a thing
most monstruouse, that woman shulde be preferred to man in any thing, whom
God had subiected to man in all thinges. He procedeth saying: Neuer the
lesse it is the parte of the man, with diligent care to repel the woman,
that geueth him wicked counsel: and woman, whiche gaue that pestilent counsel
to man, oght at all times to haue the punishment, whiche was geuen to Heua,
sounding in her eares. And in an other place he induceth God speaking to
the woman in this sorte<a NAME="an56"></a><sup><a href="#n56">[56]</a></sup>:
Because thou left him, of whose nature thou wast participant, and for whome
thou wast formed, and hast had pleasure to haue familiaritie with that
wicked beast, and wold take his counsel: therfore I subiect the to man,
and I apointe and affirme him to be thy Lorde, that thou maist acknowledge
his dominion, and because thou couldest not beare rule learne well to be
ruled. Why they shulde not beare rule, he declareth, in other places, saying<a NAME="an57"></a><sup><a href="#n57">[57]:</a></sup>
womankinde is imprudent and soft, (or flexible) imprudent because she can
not consider withe wisdome and reason the thinges which she heareth and
seeth: and softe she is, because she is easelie bowed. I knowe that Chrysostome
bringeth in these wordes<a NAME="an58"></a><sup><a href="#n58">[58]</a></sup>
to declare the cause why false prophetes do commonlie deceiue women: because
they are easelie persuaded to any opinion, especiallie if it be against
God, and because they lacke prudence and right reason to iudge the thinges
that be, spoken. But hereof may their nature be espied, and the vices of
the same, whiche in no wise oght to be in, those, that are apointed to
gouerne others: For they oght to be constant, stable, prudent and doing
euerie thing with discretion and reason, whiche vertues women can not haue
in equalitie with men. For that he doth witnesse in an other place, saying:
women haue in them selues a tickling and studhe of vaine glorie, and that
they may haue common with men: they are sodeinlie moued to anger, and that
they haue also common with some men. But vertues. in which they excell<a NAME="an59"></a><sup><a href="#n59">[59]</a></sup>,
they haue not common with man, and therfore hath the apostle remoued them
from the office of teachinge, which is an euident proof that in vertue
they farre differ frome man. Let the reasons of this writer be marked,
for further he yet procedeth: after that he hath in many wordes lamented
the effeminate maners of men, who were so farre degenerate to the weaknes
of women, that some might haue demanded: why may not women teache amongest
suche a sorte of men, who in wisdome and godlines are becomen inferior
vnto women? We finallie concludeth: that not withstanding that men be degenerate,
yet may not women vsurpe any authoritie aboue them, and in the end, he
addeth these wordes: These thinges do not I speake to extolle them (that
is women) but to the confusion and shame of our selues, and to admonish
vs to take again the dominion, that is mete and conuenient for vs, not
onelie that power which is according to the excellencie of dignitie: but
that which is accordinge to prouidence, and according to helpe, and vertue.
For then is the bodie in best proportion<a NAME="an60"></a><sup><a href="#n60">[60]</a></sup>,
when it hath the best gouernor. O that both man and woman shulde consider
the profound counsel and admonition of this father! He wolde not that man
for appetit of any vaine glorie shuld desire preeminence aboue woman. For
God hath not made man to be heade for any suche cause: but hauing respecte
to that weaknes and imperfection which alwayes letteth woman to gouerne.
He hath ordeined man to be superior, and that meaneth Chrysostome, saying:
then is the bodie in best proportion, when it hath the best gouernor. But
woman can neuer be the best gouernor, by reason that she-being spoiled
of the spirit of regiment, can neuer attein to that degree, to be called
or iudged a good gouernor. Because in the nature of all woman, lurketh
suche vices, as in good gouernors are not tolerable. Which the same writes
expresseth. in these wordes<a NAME="an61"></a><sup><a href="#n61">[61]</a></sup>:
womankind (saith he) is rashe and foolhardie, and their couetousnes is
like the goulf of hell, that is, insaciable. And therfore in an other place<a NAME="an62"></a><sup><a href="#n62">[62]</a></sup>,
he will that woman shall haue no thing to do in iudgement, in common affaires,
or in the regiment of the common welth, because she is impacient of troubles,
but that she shall liue in tranquillitie; and quietnes. And if she haue
occasion to go frome the house, that yet she shal haue no matter of trouble,
nether to, folowe her, nether to be offered vnto her, as commonlie there
must be to such as beare authoritie: And with Chrysostome fullie agreeth
Basilius Magnus in a sermon<a NAME="an63"></a><sup><a href="#n63">[63]</a></sup>
which he maketh vpon some places of scripture, wherin he reproueth diuers
vices and amongest the rest, he affirmeth woman to be a tendre creature,
flexible, soft and pitifull: whiche nature, God hath geuen vnto her, that
she may be apt to norishe children. The which facilitie of the woman, did
Satan abuse, and therby broght her frome the obedience of God. And therfore
in diuers other places doth he conclude, that she is not apt to beare rule,
and that she is forbidden to teache. Innumerable mo testimonies, of all
sortes of writers may be adduced for the same purpose, but withe these
I stand content: iudgeing it sufficient to stoppe the mouthe of such as
accuse and condemne all doctrine, as hereticall, which displeaseth them
in any point that I haue proued, by the determinations and lawes of men
illuminated onelie by the light of nature, by the ordre of Goddes creation,
by the curse and malediction pronounced against woman, by the mouth of
saint Paule, who is the interpreter of Goddes sentence, and lawe, and finallie
by the mindes of those writers, who in the church of God, haue bene alwayes
holden in greatest reuerence: that it is a thing moste repugnant to nature,
to Goddes will and apointed ordinance, (yea that it can not be without
contumelie committed against God) that a woman shuld be promoted to dominion
or empire to reigne ouer man, be it in realme, nation, prouince or citie.
Now resteth it in few wordes, to be shewed, that the same empire of women
is the subuersion of good ordre equitie and iustice.</td>

<td><a NAME="n54"></a><i><a href="#an54">[54]</a>: Chrysost. homil. 17.
in genes.</i>
<p><a NAME="n55"></a><i><a href="#an55">[55]</a>: NOTE</i>
<p><a NAME="n56"></a><i><a href="#an56">[56]</a>: Homil. 15 in Genes.</i>
<p><a NAME="n57"></a><i><a href="#an57">[57]</a>: God graunt all womens
hartes to understand and folow this sentence.</i>
<p><a NAME="n58"></a><i><a href="#an58">[58]</a>: In Mat. cap. 23. homil.
44.</i>
<p><a NAME="n59"></a><i><a href="#an59">[59]</a>: woman can no haue vertue
in equalitie with man. Ad Ephe. cap. 4. sermone 13. NOTE</i>
<p><a NAME="n60"></a><i><a href="#an60">[60]</a>: The body lackinge the
head, can not be well gouerened nether can common welth lackinge man.</i>
<p><a NAME="n61"></a><i><a href="#an61">[61]</a>: In ca. 22. Ioh. homil.
87.</i>
<p><a NAME="n62"></a><i><a href="#an62">[62]</a>: In Ioh. homil. 41.</i>
<p><a NAME="n63"></a><i><a href="#an63">[63]</a>: Basilius Mag. in aliquot
scripturae locos.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>Augustine defineth<a NAME="an64"></a><sup><a href="#n64">[64]</a></sup>
ordre to be that thing, by the whiche God hath appointed and ordeined all
thinges. Note well reader, that Augustine will admit no ordre, where Goddes
apointment is absent and lacketh.</td>

<td><a NAME="n64"></a><i><a href="#an64">[64]</a>: De ordine lib. I C.
10</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>And in an other place he saith<a NAME="an65"></a><sup><a href="#n65">[65]</a></sup>,
that ordre is a disposition, geuing their owne propre places to thinges
that be vnequall, which he termeth in Latin <i>Parium</i> et <i>disparium</i>,
that is, of thinges equall or like, and thinges vnequall or vnlike. Of
whiche two places and of the hole disputation, which is conteined in his
second boke de <i>ordine</i>, it is euident<sup><a href="#an66">[66]</a></sup>,
that what soeuer is done ether whithout the assurance of Goddes will, or
elles against his will manifestlie reueled in his word, is done against
ordre. But suche is the empire and regiment of all woman (as euidentlie
before is declared) and therfore, I say; it is a thing plainlie repugnant
to good ordre, yea it is the subuersion of the same. If any list to reiect
the definition of Augustin, as ether not propre to this purpose, or elles
as insufficient to proue mine intent: let the same man vnderstand, that
in so doinge, he hath infirmed mine argument nothinge. For as I depend
not vpon the determinations of men, so think I my cause no weaker, albeit
their authoritie be denied vnto me. Prouided that god by his will reueled,
and manifest worde, stand plain and euident on my side. That God hath subiected
womankinde to man by the ordre of his creation, and by the curse that he
hath pronounced against her is before declared. Besides these, he hath
set before our eyes, two other mirrors<a NAME="an67"></a><sup><a href="#n67">[67]</a></sup>
and glasses, in whiche he will, that we shulde behold the ordre, which
he hath apointed and established in nature: the one is, the naturall bodie
of man: the other is the politik or ciuile body of that common welth, in
which God by his own word hath apointed an ordre. In the natural body of
man God hath apointed an ordre, that the head shail occupie the vppermost
place. And the head hath he ioyned with the bodie, that frome it, doth
life and motion flowe to the rest of the membres. In it hath he placed
the eye to see, the eare to hear, and the tonge to speake, which offices
are apointed to none other membre of the bodie. The rest of the membres,
haue euery one their own place and office apointed: but none may haue nether
the place nor office of the heade. For who wolde not iudge that bodie to
be a monstre, where there was no head eminent aboue the rest, but that
the eyes were in the handes, the tonge and mouth beneth in the belie, and
the eares in the feet. Men, I say, shulde not onlie pronounce this bodie
to be a monstre: but assuredlie they might conclude that such a bodie coulde
not long indure. And no lesse monstruous is the bodie of that common welth<a NAME="an68"></a><sup><a href="#n68">[68]</a></sup>,
where a woman beareth empire. For ether doth it lack a laufull heade (as
in very dede it doth) or els there is an idol<a NAME="an69"></a><sup><a href="#n69">[69]</a></sup>
exalted in the place of the true head. An idol I call that, which hath
the forme and apparance, but lacketh the vertue and strength, which the
name and proportion do resemble and promise. As images haue face, nose,
eyes, mouth, handes and feet painted, but the vse of the same, can not
the craft and art of man geue them: as the holy ghost by the mouth of Dauid
teacheth vs, saying<a NAME="an70"></a><sup><a href="#n70">[70]</a></sup>:
they haue eyes, but they see not, mouth, but they speake not, nose, but
they smell not, handes and feet, but they nether touche nor haue power
to go. And suche, I say, is euerie realme and nation, where a woman beareth
dominion. For in despite of God (he of his iust iudgement, so geuing them
ouer in to a reprobat minde) may a realme, I confesse, exalt vp a woman
to that monstriferous honor, to be estemed as head<a NAME="an71"></a><sup><a href="#n71">[71]</a></sup>.
But impossible it is to man and angel, to geue vnto her the properties
and perfect offices of a laufull heade. For the same God that hath denied
power to the hand to speake, to the bely to heare, and to the feet to see,
hath denied to woman power to commande man, and hath taken away wisdome
to consider, and prouidence to forsee the thinges, that, be profitable
to the common welth: yea finallie he hath denied to her in any case to
be head to man: but plainly hath pronounced that man is head to woman,
euen as Christ is heade to all man<a NAME="an72"></a><sup><a href="#n72">[72]</a></sup>.
If men in a blinde rage shulde assemble to gether, and apointe them selues
an other heade then Iesus Christ (as the papistes haue done their romishe
Antichrist) shuld Christ therfore lose his owne dignitie, or shulde God
geue that counterfet head power to geue life to the bodie, to see what
soeuer might endamage or hurte it, to speake in defense, and to heare the
request of euerie subiect? It is certein that he wold not. For that honor
he hath apointed before all times to his onelie sonne: and the same will
he geue to no creature besides: no more will he admit, nor accept woman
to be the lauful head ouer man<a NAME="an73"></a><sup><a href="#n73">[73]</a></sup>,
althogh man, deuil, and angel will coniure in their fauor. For seing he
hath subiected her to one (as before is saide) he will neuer permit her
to reigne ouer manie. Seing he hath commanded her to heare, and obey one,
he will not suffre that she speake, and with vsurped authoritie command
realmes and nations. Chrysostome explaning these wordes of the apostle<a NAME="an74"></a><sup><a href="#n74">[74]</a></sup>:
(the heade of woman is man) compareth God in his vniuersall regiment to
a king sitting in his royall maiestie<a NAME="an75"></a><sup><a href="#n75">[75]</a></sup>,
to whome all his subiectes commanded to geue homage and obedience, appeare
before him, bearing euerie one suche a badge and cognisance of dignitie
and honor, as he hath geuen to them: which if they despise and contemne,
then do they dishonor their king, Euen so saith he oght man and woman to
appeare before God, bearing the ensignes of the condition, whiche they
haue receiued of him. Man hath receiued a certein glorie and dignitie aboue
the, woman, and therfore oght he to appeare before his high maiestie, bearing
the signe of his honor, hauinge no couerture vpon his heade: to witnesse
that in earth man hath no head, (beware Chrysostome what thou saist, thou
shalt be reputed a traytor if Englishe men heare the<a NAME="an76"></a><sup><a href="#n76">[76]</a></sup>:
for they must haue my souereine lady and maistresse, and Scotland hath
dronken also the enchantment and venom of Circes, let it be so to their
owne shame and confusion, he procedeth in these wordes) but woman oght
to
be couered, to witnesse, that in earth she hath a head, that is man. Trewe
it is (Chrysostome) woman is couered in both the said realmes<a NAME="an77"></a><sup><a href="#n77">[77],</a></sup>
but it is not with the signe of subiection, but it is with the signe of
superioritie, to witt, with the royal crowne. To that he answereth in these
wordes: what if man neglect his honor? he his no lesse to be mocked (saith
Chrysostome) then if a king shulde depose himself of his diademe or crowne
and royal estat, and cloth him self in the habit of a sclaue. What, I pray
you, shulde this godlie father haue saide, if he had sene all the men of
a realme or nation fall downe before a woman? If he had sene the crowne,
sceptre, and sworde, whiche are ensignes of the royall dignitie, geuen
to her, and a woman cursed of God, and made subiecte to man, placed in
the throne of iustice, to sit as Goddes lieutenant? What, I say, in this
behalfe, shuld any hart vnfeinedlie fearing, God haue iudged of suche men?
I am assured that not onlie shulde they haue bene iudged foolishe but also
enraged, and sclaues to Satan, manifestlie fighting against God and his
apointed ordre. The more that I consider the subuersion of Goddes ordre,
which he hath placed generallie in all liuinge thinges, the more I do wondre
at the blindnes of man, who doth not consider him self in this case so
degenerate, that the brute beastes are to be preferred vnto him in this
behalfe<a NAME="an78"></a><sup><a href="#n78">[78]</a></sup>. For nature
hath in all beastes printed a certein marke of dominion in the male, and
a certeine subiection in the female, whiclie they kepe inuiolate. For no
man euer sawe the lion make obedience, and stoupe before the lionesse,
nether yet can it be proued, that the hinde taketh the conducting of the
heard amongest the hartes. And yet (alas) man, who by the mouth of God
hath dominion apointed to him ouer woman, doth not onlie to his own shame,
stoupe vnder the obedience of women, but also in despit of God and of his
apointed ordre, reioyseth, and mainteineth that monstruouse authoritie,
as a thing lauful and iust, The insolent ioy<a NAME="an79"></a><sup><a href="#n79">[79]</a></sup>,
the bonefiers, and banketing which were in london and els where in England,
when that cursed Iesabell was proclaimed qwene, did witnesse to my hart,
that men were becomen more then enraged. For els howe coulde they so haue
reioysed at their owne confusion and certein destruction? For what man
was there of so base iudgement (supposing that he had any light of God)
who did not see the erecting of that monstre, to be the ouerthrowe of true
religion, and the assured destruction of England, and of the auncient liberties
therof? And yet neuer the lesse, all men so triumphed, as if God had deliuered
them frome all calamitie.</td>

<td><a NAME="n65"></a><i><a href="#an65">[65]</a>: De ciuit. Dei, lib.
19 cap. 13.</i>
<p><a NAME="n66"></a><i><a href="#an66">[66]</a>: what soener done withowt
the appointment of Goddes will is done withowt ordre.</i>
<p><a NAME="n67"></a><i><a href="#an67">[67]</a>: Two mirrors, in which
we may beholde the ordre of nature.</i>
<p><a NAME="n68"></a><i><a href="#an68">[68]</a>: Common welthes under
the rule of women, lacke a laufull heade</i>
<p><a NAME="n69"></a><i><a href="#an69">[69]</a>: Idol.</i>
<p><a NAME="n70"></a><i><a href="#an70">[70]:</a> Psal. 115.</i>
<p><a NAME="n71"></a><i><a href="#an71">[71]</a>: The empire of a woman
is an idol.</i>
<p><a NAME="n72"></a><i><a href="#an72">[72]</a>: I. COY. II</i>
<p><a NAME="n73"></a><i><a href="#an73">[73]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n74"></a><i><a href="#an74">[74]</a>: I. COY. II.</i>
<p><a NAME="n75"></a><i><a href="#an75">[75]</a>: Marke the similitude
of Chrysostome.</i>
<p><a NAME="n76"></a><i><a href="#an76">[76]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n77"></a><i><a href="#an77">[77]</a>: Howe women be couered
in England and Scotland.</i>
<p><a NAME="n78"></a><i><a href="#an78">[78]</a>: Brute beastes to be preferred.</i>
<p><a NAME="n79"></a><i><a href="#an79">[79]</a>: Insoluent ioy bringeth
sodein sorowe.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>But iust and rightuouse, terrible and fearfull are thy iudgements,
o Lorde! For as some times thou diddest so punishe men for vnthankfulnes<a NAME="an80"></a><sup><a href="#n80">[80]</a></sup>,
that man ashamed not to commit villanie withe man; and that because, that
knowinge the to be God, they glorified the not as God, euen so haste thou
moste iustlie nowe punished the proude rebellion and horrible ingratitude
of the realmes of England and Scotland. For when thou diddest offre thy
selfe moste mercifullie to them both, offering the meanes by the whiche
they might haue bene ioyned to gether for euer in godly Concorde: then
was the one proude and cruel, and the other vnconstant, and fikle of promise.
But yet (alas) did miserable England further rebell against the. For albeit
thou diddest not cease to heape benefit vpon benefit, during the reigne
of an innocent and tendre king, yet no man did acknowledge thy potent hand
and meruelouse working. The stoute courage of capitaines, the witte and
policie of counselors, the learning of bishoppes<a NAME="an81"></a><sup><a href="#n81">[81]</a></sup>,
did robbe the of thy glorie and honor. For what then was heard, as concerning
religion, but the kinges procedinges, the kinges procedinges must be obeyed?
It is enacted by parliament: therefore it is treason to speake in the contrarie.
But this was not the end of this miserable tragedie. For thou diddest yet
precede to offre thy fauors, sending thy prophetes and messagers, to call
for reformation of life in all estates<a NAME="an82"></a><sup><a href="#n82">[82]</a></sup>:
For euen frome the highest to the lowest, all were declined frome the (yea
euen those that shuld haue bene the lanterns to others) some I am assured
did qwake and tremble, and frome the botome of their hartes thirsted amendment,
and for the same purpose did earnestly call for discipline. But then brust
forth the venome which before lurked; then might they not conteine their
despiteful voices, but with open mouthes did crie: we will not haue suche
a one to reigne ouer vs. Then, I say, was euerie man so stoute, that he
wolde not be broght in bondage<a NAME="an83"></a><sup><a href="#n83">[83]:</a></sup>
no not to the, O Lord, but with disdein did the multitude cast frome them
the amiable yoke of Christ Iesus. No man wolde suffre his sinne to be rebuked,
no man wolde haue his life called to triall. And thus did they refuse the,
O Lorde, and thy sonne Christ Iesus to be their pastor, protector and prince.
And therfore hast thou geuen them ouer in to a reprobat minde. Thou hast
taken from them the spirit of boldnes, of wisdome and of rightuous iudgement.
They see their owne destruction, and yet they haue no grace to auoide it.
Yea they are becomen so blinde, that knowing the pit, they headlong cast
them selues into the same<a NAME="an84"></a><sup><a href="#n84">[84]</a></sup>;
as the nobilitie of England, do this day, fighting in the defense of their
mortall ennemie the Spaniard. Finallie they are so destitute of vnderstanding
and iudgement, that althogh they knowe that there is a libertie and fredome,
the whiche their predecessors haue inioyed; yet are they compelled to bowe
their neckes vnder the yoke of Satan, and of his proude ministres, pestilent
papistes and proude spaniardes. And yet can they not consider that where
a woman reigneth and papistes beare authoritie, that there must nedes Satan
be president of the counsel. Thus hast thou, O Lorde, in thy hote displeasure
reuenged the contempt of thy graces offred. But, O Lord, if thou shalt
reteine wrath to the end, what Aeshe is able to susteine? We haue sinned<a NAME="an85"></a><sup><a href="#n85">[85]</a></sup>,
O Lord, and are not worthy to be releued. But worthy art thou, O Lord,
to be a true God, and worthy is thy sonne Christ Iesus, to haue his Euangil
and glorie aduanced: whiche both are troden vnder foot in this cruell murther
and persecution, whiche the builders of Babylon commit in their furie,
haue raised against thy children, for the establishing of their kingdome.
Let the sobbes therfore of thy prisoners, O Lord, passe vp to thine eares,
consider their affliction: and let the eyes of thy mercie looke downe vpon
the blood of such as die for testimonie of thy eternal veritie: and let
not thine ennemies mocke thy iudgement for euer. To the, O Lorde, I turne
my wretched and wicked hart: to the alone, I direct my complaint and grones:
for in that Ile to thy saintes there is left no comfort. Albeit I haue
thus (talkinge with my God in the anguishe of my harte) some what digressed:
yet haue I not vtterlie forgotten my former proposition, to witt, that
it is a thing repugnant to the ordre of nature, that any woman be exalted
to rule ouer men. For God hath denied vnto her the office of a heade. And
in the intreating of this parte, I remembre that I haue made the nobilitie
both of England and Scotland inferior to brute beastes, for that they do
to women, which no male amongest the common sorte of beastes can be proued
to do their females: that is, they reuerence them, and qwake at their presence,
they obey their commandementes, and that against God. Wherfore I iudge
them not onelie subiectes to women, but sclaues of Satan, and seruantes
of iniquitie. If any man thinke these my wordes sharpe or vehement, let
him consider that the offense is more haynous, than can be expressed by
wordes. For where all thinges, be expressedly concluded against the glorie
and honor of God, and where the blood of the saintes of God is commanded
to be shed, whome shall we iudge, God or the deuil, to be president of
that counsel?<a NAME="an86"></a><sup><a href="#n86">[86]</a></sup> Plain
it is, that God ruleth not by his loue, mercie, nor grace in the assembly
of the vngocllie. Then it resteth, that the deuii, the prince of this worlde,
doth reigne ouer suche tyrannes. whose seruantes, I pray you, shal then
be iudged, such as obey, and execute, their tyrannie? God for his great
mercies sake, illuminate the eyes of men, that they may perceiue in to
what miserable bondage they be broght, by the monstriferous empire of women.</td>

<td><a NAME="n80"></a><i><a href="#an80">[80]</a>: Rom. I.</i>
<p><a NAME="n81"></a><i><a href="#an81">[81]</a>: what robbed God OF HIS
HONOR in England in the time of the Gospell.</i>
<p><a NAME="n82"></a><i><a href="#an82">[82]</a>: Goddes benefites shewed
to England.</i>
<p><a NAME="n83"></a><i><a href="#an83">[83]</a>: Discipline refused in
England.</i>
<p><a NAME="n84"></a><i><a href="#an84">[84]</a>: The nobilitie and the
hole realme of England, caste themselues willingly in to the pit.</i>
<p><a NAME="n85"></a><i><a href="#an85">[85]</a>: Confession.</i>
<p><a NAME="n86"></a><i><a href="#an86">[86]</a>: NOTE</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>The seconde glasse, whiche God hath set before the eyes of man<a NAME="an87"></a><sup><a href="#n87">[87]</a></sup>,
wherein he may beholde the ordre, whiche pleaseth his wisdome, concerning
authoritie and dominion, is that common welth, to the whiche it pleaseth
his maiestie to apoint, and geue lawes, statutes, rites and ceremonies
not onelie concerninge religion, but also touching their policie and regiment
of the same. And against that ordre it doth manifestly repugne, that any
woman shall occupie the throne of God, that is, the royall seate, whiche
he by his worde hath apointed to man. As in geuing the lawe to Israel,
concerning the election of a king, is euident. For thus it is writen<a NAME="an88"></a><sup><a href="#n88">[88]</a></sup>:
If thou shalt say, I will apoint a king aboue me, as the rest of the nations,
whiche are aboute me: Thou shalt make the a kinge, whome the Lorde thy
God shall chose, one frome amongest the middest of thy bretheren, thou
shalt apointe kinge aboue the. Thou maist not make a strangier that is
not thy brother. Here expressedly is a man apointed to be chosen king,
and a man natiue amongest them selues, by whiche precept is all woman and
all strangier secluded. What may be obiected for the parte or election
of a strangier, shalbe, God willinge, answered in the blast of the second
trumpet. For this present, I say, that the erecting of a woman to that
honor, is not onely to inuert the ordre, which God hath established: but
also it is to defile, pollute and prophane (so farre as in man lieth) the
throne and seat of God, whiche he hath sanctified and apointed for man
onely<a NAME="an89"></a><sup><a href="#n89">[89]</a></sup>, in the course
of this wretched life, to occupie and possesse as his ministre and lieutenant:
secluding from the same all woman, as before is expressed. If anythinke
the fore writen lawe did bindethe Iewes onelie<a NAME="an90"></a><sup><a href="#n90">[90]</a></sup>,
let the same man consider, that the election of a kinge, and apointing
of iudges, did nether apperteine to the ceremoniall lawe, nether yet was
it mere iudiciall<a NAME="an91"></a><sup><a href="#n91">[91]</a></sup>:
but that it did flowe frome the morall lawe, as an ordinance, hauing respect
to the conseruation of both the tables. For the office of the magistrate
oght to haue the first and chief respect to the glorie of God, commanded
and conteined in the former table, as is euident by that, whiche was inioyned
to Iosue by God, what time he was accepted and admitted ruler and gouerner
ouer his people, in these wordes<a NAME="an92"></a><sup><a href="#n92">[92]</a></sup>:
Thou shalt diuide the inheritance to this people, the whiche I haue sworne
to their fathers, to geue vnto them: so that thou be valiant and strong,
that thou maist kepe and do, according to that hole lawe, whiche my seruant
Moses hath commanded the. Thou shalt not decline frome it, nether to the
right hande, nether to the left hand, that thou maist do prudentlie in
all thinges, that thou takest in hand, let not the boke of this lawe departe
from thy mouth, but meditate in it, day and night: that thou maist kepe
and do, according to euery thing, that is writen in it. For then shall
thy wayes prosper, and then shalt thou do prudently &amp;c. And the same
precept geueth God by the mouth of Moses<a NAME="an93"></a><sup><a href="#n93">[93]</a></sup>,
to kinges, after they be elected, in these wordes<a NAME="an94"></a><sup><a href="#n94">[94]</a></sup>:
when he shal sit in the throne or seate of his kingdome, he shall write
to him self a copie of this lawe in a boke, and that shalbe with him, that
he may reade in it all the dayes of his life, that he may learne to feare
the Lorde his God, and to kepe all the wordes of this lawe, and all these
statutes, that he may do them &amp;c. Of these two places it is euident,
that principallie it apperteineth to the king or to the chief magistrate,
to knowe the will of God, to be instructed in his lawe and statutes, and
to promote his glorie with his hole hart and studie, which be the chief
pointes of the first table. No man denieth, but that the sworde is committed
to the magistrate, to the end that he shulde punishe vice, and mainteine
vertue. To punishe vice I say, not onelie that, whiche troubleth the tranquillitie
and quiet estat of the common welth by adulterie, theft or murther committed<a NAME="an95"></a><sup><a href="#n95">[95]</a></sup>,
but also suche vices as openly impugne the glorie of God: as idolatrie,
blasphemie, and manifest heresie, taught and obstinatly mainteined: as
the histories and notable actes of Ezechias, Iosaphat, and Iosias do plainlie
teache vs. Whose study and care was not onlie to glorifie God in their
own life and conuersation, but also they vnfeinedlie did trauel to bring
subiectes to the true worshipping and honoring of God. And did destroye
all monumentes of idolatrie, did punishe to deathe the teachers of it,
and remoued frome office and honors suche, as were mainteiners of those
abominations. Wherbie I suppose that it be euident, that the office of
the king or supreme magistrate, hath respect to the lawe morall, and to
the conseruation of both the tables.</td>

<td><a NAME="n87"></a><i><a href="#an87">[87]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n88"></a><i><a href="#an88">[88]</a>: Deut. 17.</i>
<p><a NAME="n89"></a><i><a href="#an89">[89]</a>: God hath apointed man
his ministre and lieutenant.</i>
<p><a NAME="n90"></a><i><a href="#an90">[90]</a>: Answer to an objection.</i>
<p><a NAME="n91"></a><i><a href="#an91">[91]</a>: The election of a king
floweth frome the moral lawe.</i>
<p><a NAME="n92"></a><i><a href="#an92">[92]</a>: Iosue I.</i>
<p><a NAME="n93"></a><i><a href="#an93">[93]</a>: Rulers should take hede
to this.</i>
<p><a NAME="n94"></a><i><a href="#an94">[94]</a>: Deut. 17</i>
<p><a NAME="n95"></a><i><a href="#an95">[95]</a>: what vices magistrates
oght to punishe.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>Nowe if the lawe morall, be the constant and vnchangeable will of God,
to the which the gentil is no lesse bounde, then was the Iewe<a NAME="an96"></a><sup><a href="#n96">[96]</a></sup>;
and if God will that amongest the gentiles, the ministres and executors
of his lawe be nowe apointed, as somtimes they were apointed amongest the
Iewes: further if the execution of iustice be no lesse requisite in the
policie of the gentiles, then euer it was amongest the Iewes: what man
can be foolishe to suppose or beleue, that God will nowe admit those persons,
to sit in iudgement or to reigne ouer men in the common welth of the gentiles,
whom he by his expressed word and ordinance, did before debarre and seclude
from the same? And that women were secluded from the royall seate, the
which oght to be the sanctuarie to all poore afflicted, and therfore is
iustlie called the seat of god (besides the place before recited of the
election of a king, and besides the places of the newe testament, whiche
be moste euident) the ordre and election which was kept in Iuda and Israel,
doth manifestlie declare. For when the males of the kinglie stocke failed<a NAME="an97"></a><sup><a href="#n97">[97]</a></sup>,
as oft as it chaunced in Israel and sometimes in Iuda, it neuer entered
in to the hartes of the people to chose and promote to honors any of the
kinges doughters, (had he neuer so many) but knowing Goddes vengeance to
be poured furth vpon the father by the away taking of his sonnes, they
had no further respect to his stocke, but elected suche one man or other,
as they iudged most apt for that honor and authoritie. Of whiche premisses,
I conclude (as before) that to promote a woman heade ouer men, is repugnant
to nature, and a thinge moste contrarious to that ordre, whiche God hath
approued in that common welth, whiche he did institute and rule by his
worde. But nowe to the last point, to wit, that the empire of a woman is
a thing repugnant to iustice, and the destruction of euerie common welth,
where it is receiued. In probation whereof, because the mater is more then
euident, I will vse fewe wordes. First, I say, if iustice be a constant
and perpetuall will to geue to euerie person, their own right (as the moste
learned in all ages haue defined it to be) then to geue, or to will to
geue to any person, that whiche is not their right, must repugne to iustice.
But to reigne aboue man, can neuer be the right to woman<a NAME="an98"></a><sup><a href="#n98">[98]</a></sup>:
because it is a thinge denied vnto her by God, as is before declared. Therfore
to promote her to that estat or dignitie, can be no thing els but repugnancie
to iustice. If I shulde speake no more, this were sufficient. For except
that ether they can improue the definition of iustice, or els that they
can intreate God to reuoke and call backe his sentence pronounced against
woman, they shalbe compelled to admit my conclusion. If any finde faute
with iustice, as it is defined, he may well accuse others, but me he shall
not hurt. For I haue the shield, the weapon, and the warrant of him, who
assuredlie will defend this quarel, and he commandeth me to crie:</td>

<td><a NAME="n96"></a><i><a href="#an96">[96]</a>: NOTE. The gentil no
lesse bounde to the lawe moral then the Jewe.</i>
<p><a NAME="n97"></a><i><a href="#an97">[97]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n98"></a><i><a href="#an98">[98]:</a> The first argument that
the authoritie of women repungeth to iustice.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>What soeuer repugneth to the will of god expressed in his most sacred
worde, repugneth to iustice<a NAME="an99"></a><sup><a href="#n99">[99]</a></sup>:
but that women haue authoritie ouer men repugneth to the will of God expressed
in his worde: and therfore mine author commandeth me to conclude without
feare, that all suche authoritie repugneth to iustice. The first parte
of the argument I trust dare nether Iewe nor gentile denie: for it is a
principle not onelie vniuersallie confessed, but also so depelie printed
in the hart of man, be his nature neuer so corrupted, that whether he will
or no, he is compelled at one time or other, to acknowledge and confesse<a NAME="an100"></a><sup><a href="#n100">[100]</a></sup>,
that justice is violated, when thinges are done against the will of God,
expressed by his worde. And to this confession are no lesse the reprobate
coacted and constrained, then be the chosen children of god, albeit to
a diuers end. The elect with displeasure of their facte, confesse their
offense, hauing accesse to grace and mercie, as did Adam, Dauid, Peter,
and all other penitent offenders. But the reprobat<a NAME="an101"></a><sup><a href="#n101">[101]</a></sup>,
not withstanding they are compelled to acknowledge the will of God to be
iust the which they haue offended, yet are they neuer inwardlie displeased,
with their iniquitie, but rage, complain and storme against God, whose
vengeance they can not escape<a NAME="an102"></a><sup><a href="#n102">[102]</a></sup>:
as did Cain, Iudas, Herode, Iulian called apostata, Yea Iesabel; and Athalia.
For Cain no doubte was conuict in conscience, that he had done against
iustice in murthering of his brother. Iudas did openlie, before the high
priest confesse that he had sinned, in betraying innocent blood. Herode
being stricken by the angel, did mocke those his flaterers, saying vnto
them: beholde your God (meaning of him selfe) can not nowe preserue him
self frome corruption and wormes. Iulianus was compelled in the end to
crie, O galilean (so alwayes in contempt did he name our sauiour Iesus
Christ) thou hast nowe ouercomen. And who doubteth but Iesabel, and Athalia,
before their miserable end, were conuicted in their cankered consciences,
to acknowledge that the murther, which they had committed, and the empire
whiche the one had six yeares usurped, were repugnant to iustice: Euen
so shall they I doubt not, whiche this daye do possesse and mainteine that
monstriferous authoritie of women<a NAME="an103"></a><sup><a href="#n103">[103]</a></sup>,
shortlie be compelled to acknowledge, that their studies and deuises, haue
bene bent against God: and that all such as women haue usurped, repugneth
to iustice, because, as I haue saide, it repugneth to the will of God expressed
in his sacred worde. And if any man doubte herof, let him marke wel the
wordes of the apostle, saying<a NAME="an104"></a><sup><a href="#n104">[104]</a></sup>:
I permit not a woman to teache, nether yet to vsurpe authoritie aboue man.
No man I trust will denie these wordes of the apostle, to be the wil of
God expressed in his worde: and he saith openlie, I permit not &amp;c.
Which is asmuch as, I will not, that a woman haue authority, charge or
power ouer man, for so much importeth the greke word [Greeek: anthentnin]
in that place. Nowe let man and angell conspire against God, let them pronounce
their lawes, and say, we will suffre women to beare authoritie, who then
can depose them? yet shall this one worde of the eternal God spoken by
the mouth of a weake man, thruste them euerie one in to hell. Iesabel may
for a time slepe quietlie in the bed of her fornication and hoordome, she
may teache and deceiue for a season<a NAME="an105"></a><sup><a href="#n105">[105]</a></sup>:
but nether shall she preserue her selfe, nether yet her adulterous children
frome greate affliction, and frome the sworde of Goddes vengeance, whiche
shall shortlie apprehend suche workes of iniquitie. The admonition I differe
to the end.</td>

<td><a NAME="n99"></a><i><a href="#an99">[99]:</a> The second argument.</i>
<p><a NAME="n100"></a><i><a href="#an100">[100]</a>: Nature doth confesse
that repugnancie to Goddes will is iniustice.</i>
<p><a NAME="n101"></a><i><a href="#an101">[101]</a>: the reprobat confesse
Goddes will iust.</i>
<p><a NAME="n102"></a><i><a href="#an102">[102]</a>: Genes. 4. Mat. 27.</i>
<p><a NAME="n103"></a><i><a href="#an103">[103]</a>: womans authoritie
bringeth forth monstres.</i>
<p><a NAME="n104"></a><i><a href="#an104">[104]</a>: Tim. 2.</i>
<p><a NAME="n105"></a><i><a href="#n105">[105]</a>: Apoca. 2.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>Here might I bring in the oppression and iniustice, which is committed
against realmes and nations, whiche some times liued free, and now are
broght in bondage of forein nations, by the reason of this monstriferous
authoritie and empire of women. But that I delay till better oportunitie.
And now I think it expedient to answer such obiections, as carnal and worldlie
men, yea men ignorant of God, vse to make for maintenance of this tyrannic
(authoritie it is not worthie to be called) and most vniuste empire of
woman.</td>

<td></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>First they do obiect the examples of Debora<a NAME="an107"></a><sup><a href="#n106">[106]</a></sup>,
and of Hulda the prophetesse, of whom the one iudged Israel, and the other,
by all apparance, did teache and exhorte.</td>

<td><a NAME="n106"></a><i><a href="#an106">[106]</a>: Iudic.4 Parn.3. The
defenses of the aduersaries</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>Secondarily they do obiect the lawe<a NAME="an107"></a><sup><a href="#n107">[107]</a></sup>
made by Moses for the doughters of zalphead. Thirdlie the consent of the
estates of such realmes as haue approued the empire and regiment of women.
And last the longcustome, which hath receiued the regiment of women. Their
valiant actes and prospesitie, together with some papistical lawes, which
haue confirmed the same.</td>

<td><a NAME="n107"></a><i><a href="#an107">[107]</a>: Num. 27</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td><a NAME="firstobj"></a>To the first, I answer, that particular examples
do establishe no common lawe<a NAME="an108"></a><sup><a href="#n108">[108]</a></sup>.
The causes were knowen to God alon, why he toke the spirite of wisdome
and force frome all men of those ages, and did so mightely assist women
against nature, and against his ordinarie course: that the one he made
a deliuerer to his afflicted people Israel: and to the other he gaue not
onlie perseuerance in the true religion, when the moste parte of men had
declined from the same, but also to her he gaue the spirit of prophecie,
to assure king Iosias of the thinges which were to come. With these women,
I say, did God worke potentlie, and miraculouslie, yea to them he gaue
moste singular grace and priuiledge. But who hath commanded, that a publike,
yea a tyrannicall and moste wicked lawe be established vpon these examples?
The men that obiect the same, are not altogether ignorant, that examples
haue no strength, when the question is of lawe<a NAME="an109"></a><sup><a href="#n109">[109]</a></sup>.
As if I shuld aske, what mariage is laufull? and it shulde be answered
that laufull it is to man, not onelie to haue manie wiues at ones, but
also it is laufull to marie two sisters, and to enioye them both liuing
at ones, because that Dauid, Iacob, and Salomon, seruantes of God did the
same. I trust that no man wold iustifie the vanitie of this reason. Or
if the question were demanded, if a Christian, with good conscience may
defraude, steale or deceiue: and answer were made that so he might by the
example of the Israelites, who at Goddes commandement, deceiued the Egyptians,
and spoiled them of their garmentes, golde and syluer. I thinke likewise
this reason shuld be mocked. And what greater force, I pray you, hath the
former argument? Debora did rule in Israel, and Hulda spoke prophecie in
Iuda: Ergo it is laufull for women to reigne aboue realmes and nations,
or to teache in the presence of men<a NAME="an110"></a><sup><a href="#n110">[110]</a></sup>.
The consequent is vain and of none effect. For of examples, as is before
declared, we may establishe no lawe, but we are alwayes bounde to the lawe
writen, and to the commandement expressed in the same. And the lawe writen
and pronounced by God, forbiddeth no lesse that any woman reigne ouer man,
then it forbiddeth man to take pluralitie of wiues, to mary two sisters
liuing at ons, to steale, to robbe, to murther or to lie. If any of these
hath bene transgressed, and yet God hath not imputed the same: it maketh
not the like fact or dede lawfull vnto vs. For God being free, may for
suche causes as be approued by his inscrutable wisdome, dispense with the
rigor of his lawe, and may vse his creatures at his pleasure. But the same
power is not permitted to man, whom he hath made subiect to his lawe, and
not to the examples of fathers. And this I thinke sufficient to the reasonable
and moderate spirites. But to represse the raging of womans madnes, I will
descend somwhat deeper in to the mater, and not feare to affirme: that
as we find a contrarie spirit in all these moste wicked women, that this
day be exalted in to this tyrannouse authoritie, to the spirite that was
in those godly matrons: so I feare not, I say, to affirme, that their condition
is vnlike, and that their end shalbe diuers. In those matrones we finde
that the spirit of mercie, truthe, iustice and of humilitie did reigne<a NAME="an111"></a><sup><a href="#n111">[111]</a></sup>.
Vnder them we finde that God did shewe mercie to his people, deliuering
them frome the tyrannie of strangiers, and from the venom of idolatrie
by the handes and counsel of those women: but in these of our ages, we
finde crueltie, falshed, pride, couetousnes, deceit, and oppression. In
them we also finde the spirit of Iesabel, and Athalia, vnder them we finde
the simple people oppressed, the true religion extinguished, and the blood
of Christes membres most cruellie shed. And finallie by their practises
and deceit, we finde auncient realmes and nations geuen and betrayed in
to the handes of strangiers, the titles and liberties of them taken frome
the iuste possessors. Which one thinge is an euident testimonie, howe vnlike
our mischeuous Maryes be vnto Debora, vnder whome were strangiers chased
owt of Israel, God so raising her vp to be a mother and deliuerer to his
oppressed people. But (alas) he hath raised vp these Iesabelles to be the
vttermoste of his plagues<a NAME="an112"></a><sup><a href="#n112">[112]</a></sup>,
the whiche mans vnthankfulnes hath long deserued. But his secret and most
iust iudgement, shal nether excuse them, neither their mainteiners, because
their counsels be diuers. But to prosecute my purpose, let such as list
to defend these monstres in their tyrannie, prbue first, that their souereine
maistresses be like to Debora in godlines and pitie: and secondarilie,
that the same successe doth folowe their tyrannie, which did folowe the
extraorelinarie regiment of that godlie matrone. Which things althogh they
were able to do<a NAME="an113"></a><sup><a href="#n113">[113]</a></sup>
(as they neuer shalbe, let them blowe til they brust) yet shall her example
profet them nothing at all. For they are neuer able to proue that ether
Debora, or any other godlie woman<a NAME="an114"></a><sup><a href="#n114">[114]</a></sup>
(hauing the commendation of the holie ghoste within the scriptures) hath
vsurped authoritie aboue any realme or nation, by reason of their birth
and blood. Nether yet did they claime it by right or inheritance: but God
by his singular priuiledge, fauor, and grace, exempted Debora from the
common malediction geuen to women in that behalf: and against nature he
made her prudent in counsel, strong in courage, happie in regiment, and
a blessed mother and deliuerer to his people. The whiche he did partlie
to aduance and notifie the power of his maiestie as well to his ennemies,
as
to his owne people<a NAME="an115"></a><sup><a href="#n115">[115]</a></sup>:
in that that he declared himself able to geue saluation and deliuerance,
by meanes of the moste weake vesselles: and partlie he did it to confound
and ashameall man of that age, because they had for the moste part declined
frome his true obedience. And therfore was the spirit of courage, regiment,
and boldnes taken from them for a time to their confusion and further humiliation.
But what maketh this for Mary and her matche Phillippe? One thing I wold
aske of suche as depend vpon the example of Debora, whether she was widowe
or wife, when she iudged Israel, and when that God gaue that notable victorie
to his people vnder her? If they answer she was widowe, I wold lay against
them the testimonie of the holie ghost, witnessinge that she was wife to
Lapidoth<a NAME="an116"></a><sup><a href="#n116">[116]</a></sup>. And if
they will shift, and alledge, that so she might be called, notwithstanding
that her husband was dead, I vrge them further, that they are not able
to, proue it to be any common phrase and maner of speache in the scriptures,
that a woman shall be called the wife of a dead man, except that there
be some note added, wherbie it may be knowen that her husband is departed,
as is witnessed of Anna<a NAME="an117"></a><sup><a href="#n117">[117]</a></sup>.
But in this place of the iudges, there is no note added, that her husband
shuld be dead, but rather the expressed contrarie<a NAME="an118"></a><sup><a href="#n118">[118]</a></sup>.
For the text saith: In that time a woman named Debora a prophetesse, wife
to Lapidoth iudged Israel, The holie ghost plainlie speaketh, that what
time she iudged Israel, she was wife to Lapidoth. If she was wife, and
if she ruled all alone in Israel<a NAME="an119"></a><sup><a href="#n119">[119]</a></sup>,
then I aske why did she not preferre her husband to that honor to be capitain,
and to be leader to the host of the Lord. If any thinke that it was her
husbande, the text proueth the contrarie. For it affirmeth that Barak,
of the tribe of Nephtalie was apointed to that office. If Barak had bene
her husband: to what purpose shuld the holie ghost so diligentlie haue
noted the tribe, and an other name then was before expressed? Yea to what
purpose shuld it be noted, that she send and called him? whereof I doubt
not, but that euerie reasonable man doth consider that this Barak was not
her husband, and therof likwise it is euident, that her iudgement or gouernement
in Israel was no such vsurped power, as our quenes vniustlie possesse this
day, but that it was the spirit of prophecie, which rested vpon her, what
time the multitude of the people wroght wickedlie in the eyes of the Lord:
by the whiche spirit, she did rebuke the idolatrie and iniquitie of the
people, exhort them to repentance, and in the end, did bring them this
comfort, that God shuld deliuer them from the bondage and thraldom of their
ennemies. And this she might do<a NAME="an120"></a><sup><a href="#n120">[120]</a></sup>,
not withstanding that an other did occupie the place of the supreme magistral,
(if any was in those dayes in Israel) for, so I finde did Hulda the wife
of Sallum in the dayes of Iosias king of Iuda<a NAME="an121"></a><sup><a href="#n121">[121]</a></sup>
'speake prophecie and comfort the king': and yet he resigned to her nether
the sceptre; nor the sword. That this our interpretacion, how that Debora
did iudge in Israel is the true meaning of the holie ghost, the pondering
and weying of the historic shall manifestlie proue. When she sendeth for
Barak, I pray you, in whose name geueth she him his charge?<a NAME="an122"></a><sup><a href="#n122">[122]
</a></sup>Doth
she speake to him as kinges and princes vse to speake to their subiectes
in suche cases? No, but she speaketh, as she that had a speciall reuelation
frome God, whiche nether was knovren to Barak nor to the people, saying:
hath not the Lord God of Israel commanded the? This is her preface, by
the whiche she wold stirre vp the dull senses of Barak, and of the people,
willing to persuade vnto them, that the time was comen, when God wold shewe
him selfe their protector and deliuerer, in which preface she vsurpeth
to her selfe, nether power nor authoritie. For she saith not, I being thy
princes, thy maistresse, thy souereine ladie and quene, commatide the vpon
thine allegeance, and vnder pain of treason to go, and gather an armie.
No, she spoileth her self of all power to commande, attributing that authoritie
to God, of whom she had her reuelation and certitude to apoint Barak capitain,
which after appeareth more plainlie. For when she had declared to him the
hole counsel of God, apointing vnto him aswell the nombre of his souldiors,
as the tribes, owt of which they shuld be gathered: and when she had apointed
the place of the batel, (whiche she coulde not haue done, but by especiall
reuelation of God) and had assured him of victorie in the name of God,
and yet that he fainted and openlie refused, to entre in to that iourney
except that the prophetesse wold accompanie him, she did vse against him
no external power, she did not threaten him with rebellion and death, but
for assurance of his faint hart and weake conscience, being content to
go with him, she pronounceth, that the glorie shulde not be his in that
iourney, but that the Lord shuld sell Sisera in to the hand of a woman.
Such as haue more pleasure in light then in darknes, may clearlie perceiue,
that Debora did vsurpe no such power nor authoritie, as our quenes do this
day claime. But that she was indued with the spirit of wisdome, of knowledge,
and of the true feare of God: and by the same she iudged the factes of
the rest of the people. She rebuked their defection and idolatry, yea and
also did redresse to her power, the iniuries, that were done by man to
man. But all this, I say, she did by the spirituall sworde, that is, by
the worde of God, and not by any temporall regiment or authoritie, whiche
she did vsurpe ouer Israel. In which, I suppose, at that time there, was
no laufull magistrate, by the reason of their greate affliction. For so
witnesseth the historic, saying: And Ehud being dead, the Lorde sold Israel
in to the hand of Iabin king of Canaan. And he by Sisera his capitain afflicted
Israel greatlie the space of twentie yeares. And Debora her self, in her
song of thankes geuing, confesseth that before she did arise mother in
Israel, and in the dayes of Iael, there was nothing but confusion and trouble.
If any sticke to the terme, alledging that the holie ghost saith, that
she iudged Israel<a NAME="an123"></a><sup><a href="#n123">[123]</a></sup>:
let them vnderstand, that nether doth the Ebrue word, nether yet the Latin,
alwayes signifie ciuile iudgement, or the execution of the temporall sword,
but most commonlie is taken in the sense, which we haue before expressed.
For of Christ it is said: he shal iudge many nations. And that he shall
pronounce iudgement to the gentiles<a NAME="an124"></a><sup><a href="#n124">.[124]</a></sup>
And yet it is euident, that he was no minister of the temporal sword. God
commandeth Ierusalem and Iuda to iudge betwixt him and his vineyarde, and
yet he apointed not them all to be ciuil magistrates. To Ezechiel it is
said<a NAME="an125"></a><sup><a href="#n125">[125]</a></sup>: shalt thou
not iudge them sonne of man? and after: thou sonne of man, shalt thou not
iudge? shalt thou not iudge, I say, the citie of blood? and also: behold,
I shall iudge betwixt beast and beast. And such places in great nombre,
are to be founde thrughout the hole scriptures, and yet I trust, no man
wilbe so foolish, as to thinke that any of the Prophetes were apointed
by God to be politike iudges, or to punishe the sinnes of man, by corporal
punishment. No the maner of their iudgement is expressed in these wordes<a NAME="an126"></a><sup><a href="#n126">[126]</a></sup>:
Declare to them all their abominations, and thou shalt say to them: Thus
saith the Lorde God: a citie shedding blood in the middest of her, that
her time may approche and which hath made idoles against her selfe, that
she might be polluted. Thou hast transgressed in the blood which thou hast
shed, and thou are polluted in the idoles, which thou hast made. Thus,
I say, do the prophetes of God iudge, pronouncing the sentence of God against
malefactors. And so I doubt not but Debora iudged, what time Israel had
declined from God: rebuking their defection, and exhorting them to repentance,
without vsurpation of any ciuill authoritie. And if the people gaue vnto
her for a time any reuerence or honour, as her godlines and happie counsel
did well deserue, yet was it no such empire, as our monstres claime<a NAME="an127"></a><sup><a href="#n127">[127]</a></sup>.
For which of her sonnes or nerest kinsmen left she ruler and iudge in Israel
after her. The holie ghost expresseth no such thing. Wherof it is euident,
that by her example God offreth no occasion to establish any regiment of
women aboue men, realmes, and nations.</td>

<td><a NAME="n108"></a><i><a href="#an108">[108]:</a> <a href="#ablastobj">Answer
to the first obiection.</a></i>
<p><a NAME="n109"></a><i><a href="#an109">[109]</a>: Examples against lawe
haue no strength when the question is of lawe.</i>
<p><a NAME="n110"></a><i><a href="#an110">[110]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n111"></a><i><a href="#an111">[111]</a>: Antithesis betwixt
the former matrones, and our Iesabelles.</i>
<p><a NAME="n112"></a><i>[<a href="#an112">112]:</a> NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n113"></a><i><a href="#an113">[113]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n114"></a><i><a href="#an114">[114]</a>: No godlie woman did
euer claime authoritie ouer man by reason of her birth and blood.</i>
<p><a NAME="n115"></a><i><a href="#an115">[115]</a>: Why God sometimes
worketh by extraordinarie meanes.</i>
<p><a NAME="n116"></a><i><a href="#an116">[116]</a>: Iudic. 4.</i>
<p><a NAME="n117"></a><i><a href="#an117">[117]</a>: Luc. 2</i>
<p><a NAME="n118"></a><i><a href="#an118">[118]</a>: Iudic. 4</i>
<p><a NAME="n119"></a><i><a href="#an119">[119]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n120"></a><i><a href="#an120">[120]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n121"></a><i><a href="#an121">[121]:</a> 2. Reg. 22.</i>
<p><a NAME="n122"></a><i><a href="#an122">[122]</a>: Debora commanded not
as princes vse to commande.</i>
<p><a NAME="n123"></a><i><a href="#an123">[123]</a>: To iudge is not alway
understand of the ciuil regiment.</i>
<p><a NAME="n124"></a><i><a href="#an124">[124]</a>: Isaie 2. Isaie 42.
Mich. 4. Isaie. 5.</i>
<p><a NAME="n125"></a><i><a href="#an125">[125]</a>: Ezech. 20. Ezech.
22. Ezech. 34</i>
<p><a NAME="n126"></a><i><a href="#an126">[126]</a>: Ezech. 23</i>
<p><a NAME="n127"></a><i><a href="#an127">[127]</a>: NOTE.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>But now to the second obiection<a NAME="an128"></a><sup><a href="#n128">[128]</a></sup>.
In whiche women require (as to them appeareth) nothing but equitie and
iustice. Whilest they and their patrones for them, require dominion and
empire aboue men. For this is their question: Is it not lauful, that women
haue their right and inheritance, like as the doughters of Zalphead were
commanded by the mouth of Moses to haue their portion of grounde in their
tribe?</td>

<td><a NAME="n128"></a><i><a href="#an128">[128]</a>: An answer to the
second obiection.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>I answer, it is not onlie laufull that women possesse their inheritance,
but I affirme also that iustice and equitie require, that so they do. But
therwith I adde that whiche gladlie they list not vnderstand<a NAME="an129"></a><sup><a href="#n129">[129]</a></sup>:
that to beare rule or authoritie ouer man, can neuer be right nor inheritance
to woman. For that can neuer be iust inheritance to any person, whiche
God by his word hath plainlie denied vnto them: but to all women hath God
denied authoritie aboue man, as moste manifestlie is before declared: Therfore
to her it can neuer be inheritance. And thus must the aduocates of our
ladies prouide some better example and strongar argument. For the lawe
made in fauor of the doughters of Zalphead, will serue them nothing. And
assuredlie greate wonder it is, that in so greate light of Goddes truthe,
men list to grope and wander in darknes. For let them speak of conscience<a NAME="an130"></a><sup><a href="#n130">[130]</a></sup>:
if the petition of any of these fore named women was to reigne ouer any
one tribe, yea or yet ouer any one man within Israel. Plain it is, they
did not, but onelie required, that they might haue a portion of ground
amonge the men of their tribe, lest, that the name of their father shuld
be abolished. And this was graunted vnto them without respect had to any
ciuil regiment. And what maketh this, I pray you, for the establishing
of this monstruous empire of women? The question is not: if women may not
succede to possession, substance patrimonie or inheritance, such as fathers
may leaue to their children, for that I willinglie grant<a NAME="an131"></a><sup><a href="#n131">[131]</a></sup>:
But the question is: if women may succede to their fathers in offices,
and chieflie to that office, the executor wherof doth occupie the place
and throne of God. And that I absolutelie denie: and feare not to say,
that to place a woman in authoritie aboue a realme, is to pollute and prophane
the royall seate, the throne of iustice, which oght to be the throne of
God: and that to mainteine them in the same, is nothing els, but continuallie
to rebell against God. One thing there is yet to be noted and obserued
in the lawe<a NAME="an132"></a><sup><a href="#n132">[132]</a></sup> made
concerning the inheritance of the doughters of Zalphead, to wit, that it
was forbidden vnto them to marie without their owne tribe, lest that such
portion as fell to their lotte, shuld be transferred frome one tribe to
an other, and so shuld the tribe of Manasses be defrauded and spoiled of
their iust inheritance by their occasion. For auoiding of which it was
commanded by Moses, that they should marie in the familie or housholde
of the tribe and kindred of their father. Wonder it is that the aduocates
and patrones of the right of our ladies did not consider and ponder this
lawe<a NAME="an133"></a><sup><a href="#n133">[133]</a></sup> before that
they counseled the blinde princes and vnworthie nobles of their countries,
to betray the liberties therof in to the handes of strangiers. England
for satisfying of the inordinat appetites of that cruell monstre Marie
(vnworthie by reason of her bloodie tyrannie, of the name of a woman) betrayed
(alas) to the proude spaniarde: and Scotlande by the rashe madnes of foolish
gouerners, and by the practises of a craftie dame resigned likewise, vnder
title of mariage in to the power of France. Doth such translation of realmes
and nations please the iustice of God, or is the possession by such means
obteined, lauful in his sight? Assured I am that it is not<a NAME="an134"></a><sup><a href="#n134">[134]</a></sup>.
No other wise, I say, then is that possession, wherunto theues, murtherers,
tyrannes and oppressors do attein by theft, murther, tyrannie, violence,
deceit, and oppression, whiche God of his secrete (but yet most iust) iudgement
doth often permit for punishment, as wel of the sufferers, as of the violent
oppressors, but doth neuer approue the same as laufull and godlie. For
if he wold not permit that the inheritance of the children of Israel shuld
passe frome one tribe to an other by the mariage of any doughter, not withstanding<a NAME="an135"></a><sup><a href="#n135">[135]
</a></sup>that
they were all one people, all spake one tonge, all were descended of one
father, and all did professe one God, and one religion: If yet, I say,
God wold not suffer that the commoditie and vsuall frute, which might be
gathered of the portion of grounde limited and assigned to one tribe shulde
passe to an other: Will he suffer that the liberties, lawes, commodities
and frutes of hole realmes and nations, be geuen in to the power and distribution
of others, by the reason of mariage, and in the powers of suche, as besides,
that they be of a strange tonge, of strange maners and lawes, they are
also ignorant of God, ennemies to his truth, deniers of Christ Iesus, persecutors
of his true membres, and haters of all vertue? As the odious nation of
spaniardes doth manifestlie declare: who for very despit, which they do
beare against Christe Iesus, whome their forefathers did crucifie (for
Iewes they are<a NAME="an136"></a><sup><a href="#n136">[136]</a></sup>,
as histories do witnesse, and they them selues confesse) do this day make
plaine warre against all true professors of his holie gospell. And howe
blindlie and outragiouslie the frenche king, and his pestilent prelates
do, fight against the veritie of God, the flaming fiers, which lick vp
the innocent blood of Christes membres, do witnesse, and by his cruel edictes
is notified and proclaimed<a NAME="an137"></a><sup><a href="#n137">[137]</a></sup>.
And yet to these two cruell tyrannes (to France, and Spain I meane) is
the right and possession of England and Scotland apointed. But iust or
laufull shall that possession neuer be, till God do chaunge the statute
of his former lawe: whiche he will not do for the pleasure of man. For
he hath not created the earth to satisfie the ambition of two or three
tyrannes, but for the vniuersall seed of Adam<a NAME="an138"></a><sup><a href="#n138">[138]</a></sup>:
and hath apointed and defined the boundes of their habitation to diuerse
nations, assigning diuers countries as he him selfe confesseth, speaking
to Israel in these wordes<a NAME="an139"></a><sup><a href="#n139">[139]</a></sup>:
You shal passe by the boundes and limiter, of your bretheren the sonnes
of Esau, who dwell in mount Seir. They shall feare you. But take diligent
hede, that ye shewe not your selues cruell against them. For I will geue
you no part of their land. No not the bredth of a foote. For mount Seir
I haue geuen to Esau to be possessed. And the same he doth witnesse of
the sonnes of Lot<a NAME="an140"></a><sup><a href="#n140">[140]</a></sup>,
to whom he had geuen Arre to be possessed. And Moses plainlie affirmeth,
that when the almightie did distribute, and diuide possessions to the gentiles,
and when he did disperse, and scatter the sonnes of men, that then he did
apoint the limites and boundes of peoples, for the nomber of the sonnes
of Israel. Wherof it is plain<a NAME="an141"></a><sup><a href="#n141">[141]</a></sup>,
that God hath not exposed the earth in pray to tyrannes, making all thing
laufull, which by violence and murther they may possesse, but that he hath
apointed to euery seuerall nation, a seuerall possession, willing them
to stand content (as nature did teache an ethnik<a NAME="an142"></a><sup><a href="#n142">[142]</a></sup>
to affirme) with that portion, which by lotte and iust meanes they had
mioyed. For what causes God permitteth this his distribution to be troubled,
and the realmes of auncient nations to be possessed of strangiers, I delay
at this time to intreate. Onlie this I haue recited to geue the worlde
to vnderstand, that the reigne, empire, and authoritie of women<a NAME="an143"></a><sup><a href="#n143">[143]</a></sup>,
hath no grounde within Goddes scriptures. Yea that realmes or prouinces
possessed by their mariage, is nothinge but vniust conquest. For so litle
doth the lawe made for the doughters of Zalphead helpe the cause of your
quenes, that vtterlie it fighteth against them, both damning their authoritie
and fact. But now to the thirde objection.</td>

<td><a NAME="n129"></a><i><a href="#an129">[129]</a>: what woman wold not
gladly heare.</i>
<p><a NAME="n130"></a><i><a href="#an130">[130]</a>: the daughters of Zalphead
desired to reigne ouer no man in Israel.</i>
<p><a NAME="n131"></a><i><a href="#an131">[131]</a>: women may succede
to inheritance but not to office.</i>
<p><a NAME="n132"></a><i><a href="#an132">[132]</a>: Num. 36</i>
<p><a NAME="133"></a><i><a href="#an133">[133]</a>: Our patrones for women
do not marke this caution.</i>
<p><a NAME="n134"></a><i><a href="#an134">[134]</a>: Realmes gotten by
practises
are no iuste posession.</i>
<p><a NAME="n135"></a><i><a href="#an135">[135]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n136"></a><i><a href="#an136">[136]</a>: The spaniardes are
Iewes and they bragge that Marie of England is the roote of Iesse.</i>
<p><a NAME="n137"></a><i><a href="#an137">[137]</a>: Note the law which
he hath proclaimed in France against such as he termeth Lutherians.</i>
<p><a NAME="n138"></a><i><a href="#an138">[138]</a>: Act. 17.</i>
<p><a NAME="n139"></a><i><a href="#an139">[139]</a>: Deuter. 2.</i>
<p><a NAME="n140"></a><i><a href="#an140">[140]</a>: Deut.32.</i>
<p><a NAME="n141"></a><i><a href="#an141">[141]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n142"></a><i><a href="#an142">[142]</a>: Cicero offic. lib.
I.</i>
<p><a NAME="n143"></a><i><a href="#an143">[143]</a>: Realmes gotten by
mariage, is uniust conquest.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>The consent, say they, of realmes and lawes pronounced and admitted
in this behalfe, long consuetude and custorne, together with felicitie
of some women in their empires haue established their authoritie<a NAME="an144"></a><sup><a href="#n144">[144]</a></sup>.
To whome, I answer, that nether may the tyrannie of princes, nether the
foolishnes of people, nether wicked lawes made against God, nether yet
the felicitie that in this earthe may herof insue, make that thing laufull,
whiche he by his word hath manifestlie condemned. For if the approbation
of princes and people, lawes made by men, or the consent of realmes, may
establishe any thing against God and his word, then shuld idolatrie be
preferred to the true religion. For mo realmes and nations, mo lawes and
decrees published by Emperours with common consent of their counsels, haue
established the one, then haue approued the other. And yet I thinke that
no man of sounde iudgement, will therfore iustifie and defend idolatrie.
No more oght any man to mainteine this odious empire of women, althogh
that it were approued of all men by their lawes. For the same God that
in plain wordes forbiddeth idolatrie, doth also forbidde the authoritie
of women ouer man. As the wordes of saint Paule before rehearsed do plainly
teach vs. And therfore whether women be deposed from that vniust authoritie<a NAME="an145"></a><sup><a href="#n145">[145]</a></sup>
(haue they neuer vsurped it so long) or if all such honor be denied vnto
them, I feare not to affirme that they are nether defrauded of right, nor
inheritance. For to women can that honor neuer be due nor laufull (muche
lesse inheritance) whiche God hath so manifestlie denied vnto them.</td>

<td><a NAME="n144"></a><i><a href="#an144">[144]</a>: Answer to the third
obiection.</i>
<p><a NAME="n145"></a><i><a href="#an145">[145]</a>: women may and oght
to be deposed from authoritie.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>I am not ignorant that the subtill wittes of carnall men (which can
neuer be broght vnder obedience of Goddes simple preceptes to maintein
this monstruous empire) haue yet two vaine shiftes<a NAME="an146"></a><sup><a href="#n146">[146]</a></sup>.
First they alledge, that albeit women may not absolutelie reigne by themselues,
because they may nether sit in iudgement, nether pronounce sentence, nether
execute any publike office: yet may they do all such thinges by their lieutenantes,
deputies and iudges substitute. Secondarilie, say they, a woman borne to
rule ouer anyrealme, may chose her a husband, and to him she may transfer
and geue her authoritie and right. To both I answer in fewe wordes. First
that frome a corrupt and venomed fountein can spring no holsome water:
Secondarilie that no person hath power to geue the thing, which doth not
iustlie appertein to them selues<a NAME="an147"></a><sup><a href="#n147">[147]</a></sup>:
But the authoritie of a woman is a corrupted fountein, and therfore from
her can neuer spring any lauful officer. She is not borne to rule ouer
men: and therfore she can apointe none by her gift, nor by her power (which
she hathn ot) to the place of a laufull magistrat. And therfore who soeuer
receiueth of a woman<a NAME="an148"></a><sup><a href="#n148">[148]</a></sup>,
office or authoritie, are adulterous and bastard officers before God. This
may appeare straunge at the first affirmation, but if we will be as indifferent
and equall in the cause of God, as that we can be in the cause of man,
the reason shall sodeinlie appeare. The case suposed, that a tyranne by
conspiracie vsurped the royall seat and dignitie of a king, and in the
same did so established him selfe, that he apointed officers, and did what
him list for a time, and in this meane time, the natiue king made streit
inhibition to all his subiectes, that none shuld adhere to this traitor,
nether yet receiue any dignitie of him, yet neuer the lesse they wold honor
the same traitor as king, and becomme his officers in all affaires of the
realme. If after, the natiue prince did recouer his iust honor and possession,
shuld he repute or esteme any man of the traitors apointement for a laufull
magistrate? or for his frende and true subiect? or shuld he not rather
with one sentence condemne the head with the membres? And if so he shuld
do, who were able to accuse him of rigor? much lesse to condemne his sentence
of iniustice. And dare we denie the same power to God in the like case?
For that woman reigneth aboue man, she hath obteined it by treason and
conspiracie committed against God. Howe can it be then, that she being
criminall and giltie of treason against God committed, can apointe any
officer pleasing in his sight? It is a thing impossible<a NAME="an149"></a><sup><a href="#n149">[149]</a></sup>.
Wherefore let men that receiue of women authoritie, honor or office, be
most assuredly persuaded, that in so mainteining that vsurped power, they
declare them selues ennemies to God. If any thinke, that because the realme
and estates therof, haue geuen their consentes to a woman, and haue established
her, and her authoritie: that therfore it is laufull and acceptable before
God: let the same men remembre what I haue said before, to wit, that God
can not approue the doing nor consent of any multitude, concluding any
thing against his worde and ordinance, and therfore they must haue a more
assured defense against the wrath of God, then the approbation and consent
of a blinded multitude, or elles they shall not be able to stand in the
presence of the consuming fier: that is, they must acknowledge that the
regiment of a woman is a thing most odious in the presence of God. They
must refuse to be her officers[<a NAME="an150"></a><sup><a href="#n150">150]</a></sup>,
because she is a traitoresse and rebell against God. And finallie they
must studie to represse her inordinate pride and tyrannie to the vttermost
of their power. The same is the dutie of the nobilitie and estates, by
whose blindnes a woman is promoted. First in so farre, as they haue moste
haynouslie offended against God, placing in authoritie suche as God by
his worde hath remoued frome the same, vnfeinedly they oght to call for
mercie, and being admonished of their error and damnable fact, in signe
and token of true repentance, with common consent they oght to retreate
that, which vnaduisedlie and by ignorance they haue pronounced, and oght
without further delay to remoue from authority all such persones, as by
vsurpation, violence, or tyrannie, do possesse the same. For so did Israel
and Iuda after they had reuolted from Dauid, and Iuda alone in the dayes
of Athalia<a NAME="an151"></a><sup><a href="#n151">[151]</a></sup>. For
after that she by murthering her sonnes children, had obteined the empire
ouer the land, and had most vnhappelie reigned in Iuda six years, Ichoiada
the high priest called together the capitaines and chief rulers of the
people<a NAME="an152"></a><sup><a href="#n152">[152]</a></sup>, and shewing
to them the kinges sonne Ioas[h], did binde them by an othe to depose that
wicked woman, and to promote the king to his royall seat, which they faithfullie
did, killinge at his commandement not onlie that cruell and mischeuous
woman, but also the people did destroie the temple of Baal, break his altars
and images, and kill Mathan Baales high priest before his altars. The same
is the dutie aswell of the estates, as of the people that hath bene blinded.
First they oght to remoue frome honor and authoritie, that monstre in nature.
(so call I a woman cled in the habit of man, yea a woman against nature
reigning aboue man). Secondarilie if any presume to defende that impietie,
they oght not to feare, first to pronounce, and then after to execute against
them the sentence of deathe. If any man be affraid to violat the oth of
obedience, which they haue made to suche monstres, let them be most assuredly
persuaded, that as the beginning of their othes, preceding from ignorance
was sinne, so is the obstinate purpose to kepe the same, nothinge but plaine
rebellion against God. But of this mater in the second blast, God willing,
we shall speake more at large.</td>

<td><a NAME="n146"></a><i><a href="#an146">[146]:</a> the fourth obiection.</i>
<p><a NAME="n147"></a><i><a href="#an147">[147]:</a> women can make no
laufull officer.</i>
<p><a NAME="n148"></a><i><a href="#an148">[148]</a>: Let England and Scotland
take hede.</i>
<p><a NAME="n149"></a><i><a href="#an149">[149]:</a> woman in authoritie
is rebel against God.</i>
<p><a NAME="n150"></a><i><a href="#an150">[150]:</a> what the nobilite
ough to do in this behalf.</i>
<p><a NAME="n151"></a><i><a href="#an151">[151]</a>: 2 Reg. II.</i>
<p><a NAME="n152"></a><i><a href="#an152">[152]</a>: Marke this fact, for
it agreeth with Goddes lawe pronounced.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>And nowe to put an end to the first blast, seing that by the ordre
of nature, by the malediction and curse pronounced against woman, by the
mouth of S. Paule the intrepreter of Goddes sentence, by the example of
that common welth, in whiche God by his word planted ordre and policie,
and finallie by the iudgement of the most godlie writers, God hath deiected
woman frome rule, dominion, empire, and authoritie aboue man. Moreouer,
seing that nether the example of Debora, nether the lawe made for the doughters
of Zalphead, nether yet the foolishe consent of an ignorant multitude,
be able to iustifie that whiche God so plainlie hath condemned: let all
men take hede what quarell and cause frome hence furthe they do defend<a NAME="an153"></a><sup><a href="#n153">[153]</a></sup>.
If God raise vp any noble harte to vendicat the libertie of his countrie,
and to suppresse the monstruous empire of women, let all suche as shal
presume to defend them in the same, moste certeinlie knowe, that in so
doing, they lift their hand against God, and that one day they shall finde
his power to fight against their foolishnes. Let not the faithfull, godlie,
and valiant hartes of Christes souldiers be vtterlie discouraged, nether
yet let the tyrannes reioise, albeit for a time they triumphe against such
asstudie to represse their tyrannie, and to remoue them from vniust authoritie.
For the causes alone, why he suffereth the souldiers to fail in batel,
whome neuerthelesse he commandeth to fight as somtimes did Israel fighting
against Beniamin. The cause of the Israelites was most iust: for it was
to punishe that horrible abomination of those sonnes of Belial<a NAME="an154"></a><sup><a href="#n154">[154]</a></sup>,
abusing the leuites wife, whome the Beniamites did defend. And they had
Goddes precept to assure them of well doing. For he did not onelie commande
them to fight, but also apointed Iuda to be their leader and capitain,
and yet fell they twise in plain batel against those most wicked adulterers.</td>

<td><a NAME="n153"></a><i><a href="#an153"></a>[153]:<a NAME="admonition"></a><a href="#aadmon">An
admonition.</a></i>
<p><a NAME="n154"></a><i><a href="#an154">[154]</a>: Iudic. 20.</i>
<br>&nbsp;</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>The secret cause of this, I say, is knowen to God alone. Rut by his
euident scriptures we may assuredly gather<a NAME="an155"></a><sup><a href="#n155">[155]</a></sup>,
that by such means doth his wisdome somtimes, beat downe the pride of the
flesh (for the Israelites at the firste trusted in their multitude, power
and strength) and somtimes by such ouerthrowes, he will punish the offenses
of his owne children, and bring them, to the vnfeined knowledge of the
same, before he will geue them victorie against the manifest contemners,
whom he hath apointed neuerthelesse to vttermost perdition: as the end
of that batel did witnesse. For althogh with greate murther the children
of Israel did twise fall before the Beniamites, yet after they had wept
before the Lorde, after they had fasted and made sacrifice in signe of
their vnfeined repentance, they so preuailed against that proude tribe
of Beniamin<a NAME="an156"></a><sup><a href="#n156">[156]</a></sup>, that
after 25 thousande strong men of warre were killed in batel, they destroyed
man, woman, childe and beaste, as well in the fieldes, as in the cities,
whiche all were burned with fier, so that onelie of that hole tribe remained
six hundredth men, who fled to the wildernes, where they remained foure
monethes, and so were saued. The same God, who did execute this greuous
punishment, euen by the handes of those<a NAME="an157"></a><sup><a href="#n157">[157]</a></sup>,
whom he suffred twise to be ouercomen in batel, doth this day retein his
power and justice. Cursed Iesabel of England, with the pestilent and detestable
generation of papistes, make no litle bragge and boast, that they haue
triumphed not only against Wyet, but also against all such as haue entreprised
any thing against them or their procedinges. But let her and them consider,
that yet they haue not preuailed against god, his throne is more high,
then that the length of their hornes be able to reache. And let them further
consider, that in the beginning of their bloodie reigne, the haruest of
their iniquitie was not comen to full maturitie and ripenes. No, it was
so grene, so secret I meane, so couered, and so hid with hypocrisie, that
some men (euen the seruantes of God) thoght it not impossible, but that
wolues might be changed in to lambes, and also that the vipere might remoue
her natural venom. But God, who doth reuele in his time apointed the secretes
of hartes, and that will haue his iudgementes iustified euen by the verie
wicked, hath now geuen open testimonie of her and their beastlie crueltie.
For man and woman, learned and vnlearned, nobles and men of baser sorte,
aged fathers and tendre damiselles, and finailie the bones of the dead,
aswell women as men haue tasted of their tyrannie, so that now not onlie
the blood of father Latimer, of the milde man of God the bishop of Cantorburie,
of learned and discrete Ridley, of innocent ladie Iane dudley, and many
godly and worthie preachers, that can not be forgotten, such as fier hath
consumed, and the sworde of tyrannie moste vniustlie hath shed, doth call
for vengeance in the eares of the Lord God of hostes: but also the sobbes
and teares of the poore oppressed, the groninges of the angeles, the watch
men of the Lord, yea and euerie earthlie creature abused by their tyrannie
do continuallie crie and call for the hastie execution of the same. I feare
not to say, that the day of vengeance, whiche shall apprehend that horrible
monstre Iesabal of England, and suche as maintein her monstruous crueltie,
is alredie apointed in the counsel of the Eternall; and I verelie beleue
that it is so nigh, that she shall not reigne so long in tyrannie, as hitherto
she hath done, when God shall declare him selfe to be her ennemie, when
he shall poure furth contempt vpon her, according to her crueltie, and
shal kindle the hartes of such, as somtimes did fauor her with deadly hatred
against her, that they may execute his iudgementes. And therfore let such
as assist her, take hede what they do. For assuredlie her empire and reigne
is a wall without foundation<a NAME="an158"></a><sup><a href="#n158">[158]</a></sup>:
I meane the same of the authoritie of all women. It hath bene vnderpropped
this blind time that is past, with the foolishnes of people; and with the
wicked lawes of ignorant and tyrannous princes. But the fier of Goddes
worde is alredie laide to those rotten proppes (I include the Popes lawe
with the rest) and presentlie they burn, albeit we espie not the flame:
when they are consumed, (as shortlie they will be, for stuble and drie
timbre can not long indure the fier) that rotten wall, the vsurped and
vniust empire of women, shall fall by it self in despit of all man, to
the destruction of so manie, as shall labor to vphold it. And therfore
let all man be aduertised, for the trumpet hath ones blowen.</td>

<td>
<br><a NAME="n155"></a><i><a href="#an155">[155]</a>: Why God permitteth
somtimes his owne souldiers to fail in batel.</i>
<p><a NAME="n156"></a><i><a href="#an156">[156]</a>: Iudic. 20</i>
<p><a NAME="n157"></a><i><a href="#an157">[157]</a>: NOTE.</i>
<p><a NAME="n158"></a><i><a href="#an158">[158]</a>: The authoritie of
all women, is a wall without foundation.</i></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td>
<center>Praise God ye that feare him.</center>
</td>

<td></td>
</tr>
</table>

<p>
<hr width="100%">
<p>The following postscript occurs at p. 78 of JOHN KNOX'S <i>Appellation
&amp;c.</i>, which is dated "From Geneua. The 14 of Iuly, 1558."
<h1>
<a NAME="to the reader"></a><a href="#areader">IOHN KNOXE TO THE READER.</a></h1>
Because many are offended at the first blast of the trompett, in whiche
I affirme, that to promote a woman to beare rule, or empire aboue any realme,
nation or citie, is repugnant to nature, contumelie to God, and a thing
moste contrariouse to his reuealed and approued ordenance: and because
also, that somme hath promised (as I vnderstand) a confutation of the same,
I haue delayed the second blast, till such tyme as their reasons appere,
by the which I either may be reformed in opinion, or els shall haue further
occasion more simply and plainly to vtter my iudgement. Yet in the meane
tyme for the discharge of my conscience; and for auoyding suspition, whiche
might be ingendred by reason of my silence, I could not cease to notifie
these subsequent propositions, which by Gods grace I purpose to entreate
in the second blast promised.
<p>1 It is not birth onely nor propinquitie of blood, that maketh a kinge
lawfully to reign aboue a people professing Christe Iesus, and his eternall
veritie, but in his election must the ordenance, which God hath established,
in the election of inferiour iudges be obserued.
<p>2 No manifest idolater nor notoriouse transgressor of gods holie preceptes
o[u]ght to be promoted to any publike regiment, honour or dignitie in any
realme, prouince or citie, that hath subiected the[m] self to Christe lesus
and to his blessed Euangil.
<p>3 Neither can othe nor promesse bynd any such people to obey and maintein
tyrantes against God and against his trueth knowen.
<p>4 But if either rashely they haue promoted any manifest wicked personne,
or yet ignorantly haue chosen suche a one, as after declareth him self
vnworthie of regiment abouc the people of God (and suche be all idolaters
and cruel persecuters) moste iustely may the same men depose and punishe
him, that vnaduysedly before they did nominate, appoint and electe.
<h4>
<i>MATTH. VI</i>.</h4>
If the eye be single, the whole body shalbe clere.
<p>[Underlying these Propositions is the great truth that the Rulers exist
for the people, and not the people for the Rulers.]
<p>
<hr width="100%">
<h1>
<a NAME="appendix"></a><a href="#aapendix">APPENDIX.</a></h1>

<h2>
<a NAME="defence to QE"></a>J<i>OHN KNOX's apologetical Defence of his
First Blast &amp;c. to Queen ELIZABETH</i>.</h2>

<h4>
<a NAME="12july"></a>12 JULY 1559. JOHN KNOX to Sir WILLIAM CECIL.</h4>
The spreit of wisdom heall your hart to the glorie of God and to the comforte
of his afflicted mind.
<p>On[e] caus[e] of my present writing is ryght honorable humblie to requyr
you to Deliuer this other lettre enclosed to the quenes grace quilk conteaneht
in few and sempill wordes my confession what I think of her authoritie,
how far it is Just, and what may make it odious in goddis presence.
<p>I hear there is a confutation sett furht in prent against <i>the first
blast</i>. God graunt that the writar haue no more sought the fauours of
the world, no less the glory of God and the stable commoditie of his country
then did him who interprised in that <i>blast</i> to vt[t]er his Conscience.
When I shall haue tym[e] (which now Is Dear and straitt vnto me) to peruse
that work I will communicat[e] my Judgement with you concernying the sam[e].
The tym[e] Is now sir that all that eyther thrust Christ Jesus to r[e]ing
in this yle, the liberties of the sam [e] to be keapt, to the inhabitantes
therof, and theire hartis to be joyned together in love vnfeaned ought
rather to study how the sam[e] may be brought to pass then vainly to trauall
for the maintenance of that wharof allready we have seen the daunger, and
felt the smart.
<p><i>State Papers, Scotland, Vol</i>. Art. 57. in Public Record office,
London.&nbsp;
<hr WIDTH="100%">
<h3>
<a NAME="20july"></a>20 JULY 1559. JOHN KNOX'S <i>Declaration</i> to QUEEN
ELIZABETH.</h3>
To the verteuus and godlie ELIZABEHT by the grace of GOD quen of England
etc JOHN KNOX desireht the perpetuall Encrease of the Holie Spiritt. etc.
<p>As your graces displeasur against me most Iniustlie conceaned, hath
be[en] and is to my wretched hart a burthen grevous and almost intollerabill,
so is the testimonye of a clean conscience to me a stay and vphold that
in desperation I sink not, how vehement that ever the temptations appear,
for in GODDis presence my conscience beareht me reacord that maliciouslie
nor of purpose I inoffended your grace, nor your realme. And therfor how
so ever I be ludged by man, I am assured to be absolued by him who onlie
knoweht the secreatis of hartes.
<p>I can not Deny the Writeing of a booke against the vsurped aucthoritie
and Iniust regiment of wemen, neyther yet am I mynded to retract or to
call any principall point or proposition of the sam[e], till treuth and
veritie do farther appear, but why that eyther your grace, eyther yit ony
such as vnfeanedlie favourthe libertie of England should be offended at
the aucthor of such a work I can perceaue no iust occasion. For first my
booke tuchheht not your graces' person in especiall, neyther yit is it
preiudiciall till any libertie of the realme yf the tyme and my Writing
be indifferently considered. How could I be enemy to your graces person?
for deliuerance quhairof I did mor[e] study, and interprise farther, than
any of those that now accuse me. And as concerning your regiment how could?
or can I envy that? which most I haue thrusted and for the which (as obliuion
will suffer) I render thankis vnfeanedlie unto GOD that is, that it hath
pleased Him of His eternall goodnes to exalt your head (which tymes wes
in Daunger) to the manifestation of his glorie and extirpation of Idolatrie.
<p>And as for any offence whiche I haf committed against England eyther
in writeing that or of any other werk I will not refuse that moderate and
indifferent men Iudge and decerne betwixt me and thost that accuse me.
To witt Whither of the partijs Do most hurt the libertie of England, I
that afferme that no woman may be exalted above any realme to mak[e] the
libertie of the sam[e] thrall to a straunge, proud, and euell nation, or
thai that approve whatsoeuir pleaseth princes for the tyme.
<p>Yf I were wer[e] asweall disposed till accuse, as som of them (till
thair owne schame) haue declared thame selves I nothing dowbt but that
in few wordis I should lett ressonabill men vnderstand that som that this
Day lowlie crouche to your grace, and lauboure to make me odious in your
eyes, did in your aduersitie neyther shew thame selvis faithfull frendis
to your grace, neyther yit so loving and cairfull ouer thair native cuntry
as now thai wold be esteamed.
<p>But omitting the accusation of others for my owne purgation and for
your graces satisfaction I say. That nothyng in my booke conceaued Is,
or can be preiudiciall to your graces iust regiment prouided that ye be
not found vngrate unto GOD. Vngrate ye shalbe proued in presence of His
throne, (howsoeuir that flatterairs Iustifie your fact) yf ye transfer
the glory of that honour in which ye now stand to any other thing, then
to the dispensation of His mercy which onelye mackethe that lauthfull to
your grace Which nature and law Denyeth to all woman. Neyther wold I that
your grace should fear that this your humiliation befoir GOD should in
any case infirm or weaken your Iust and lauthfull authoritie befoir men.
Nay madam such vnfeaned confession of goddis benefittis receaued shalbe
the establishment of the sam[e] not onelye to your self, bot also to your
sead and posteritie. Whane contrariwise a prowd conceat, and eleuation
of your self shalbe the occasion that your reing shalbe vnstabill, trublesum
and schort.
<p>GOD is witness that vnfeanedlie I both love and reverence your grace,
yea I pray that your reing may be long, prosperous, and quyet. And that
for the quyetnes which CHRISTIS membris before persecuted haue receaued
vnder yow but yit yf I should flatter your grace I were no freind, but
a deceavabill trater. And therfor of conscience I am compelled to say,
that neyther the consent of peopill, the proces of tyme, nor multitude
of men, can establish a law which GOD shall approve, but whatsoeuer He
approveht (by his eternall word) that shalbe approued, and whatsoeuer he
dampneth shalbe condampneth, though all men in earth wold hasard the iustification
of the sam[e]. And therfor[e] madam the onlie way to retean and to keap
those benefittes of GOD haboundandlie powred now of laitt Dayis vpon yow,
and vpon your realme is vnfeanedlie to rendir vnto GOD, to His mercy and
vndeserued grace the [w]holl glory of this your exaltatioun, forget your
byrth and all tytill which thervpon doth hing[e], and considder deaplie
how for feir of your lyfe ye did declyne from GOD, and bow till Idolatrie.
Lett it not appear a small offence in your eyis, that ye haue declyned
from CHRIST IESUS in the Day of his battale, neyther yit wold I that ye
should esteam that mercy to be vulgar and commone which ye haue receaued.
To witt, that GOD hath covered your formar offence, hath presented yow
when ye were most unthankfull, and in the end hath exalted and raised yow
vp not onlie from the Dust, but also from the portes [<i>gates</i>] of
death to reull above his people for the confort of his kirk. It aperteaneth
to yow thairfor to ground the iustice of your aucthoritie not vpon that
law which from year to year Doth change, but vpon the eternall prouidence
of Hym who contrarfy to nature, and without your deserving hath thus exalted
your head.
<p>Yf thus in GODDis presence ye humill [<i>humble</i>] your self, as in
my hart I glorifie GOD for that rest granted to His afflicted flock within
England under yow a weak instrument, so will I with toung and pen iustifie
your aucthoritie and regiment as the HOLIE GHOST hath iustified the same
In DEBORA, that blessed mother in Israeli, but yf these premisses (as GOD
forbid) neglected, ye shall begyn to brag of your birth, and to build your
aucthoritie vpon your owne law, flatter yow who so list youre felicite
shalbe schort. Interpret my rud[e] wordis in the best part as written by
him who is no ennemye to your grace.
<p>By diuerse letters I haue required licence to vesitt your realme not
to seik my self neyther yit my owen ease, or commodite. Whiche yf ye now
refuse and. deny I must remit my [?] to GOD, adding this for conclusioun,
that commonlie it is sein that such as luf not the counsall of the faithfull
(appear it never so scharp) are compelled to follow the Deceat of flatteraris
to thair owen perdition. The mighty Spreit of the Lord IESUS move your
hart to vnderstand what is said, geve vnto yow the discretion of spirittes,
and so reull yow in all your actlonis and interprisis that in yow GOD may
be glorified, His church edified, and ye your self as a livelie member
of the sam[e] may be an exempill and mirroure of vertew and of godlie Lief
till others.
<p>So be it. Off Edinburgh the 20. Day of Julij. 1559.
<p>By your graces [w]holly to command in godlynes.
<p><i>Endorsed</i>. JOHN KNOX.
<p>To the ryght myghty ryght high and ryght excellent princesse ELZABETH
quen of England, etc.
<p>Be these Deliuered <i>State Papers, Scotland, Vol. 1 Art. 65</i>.
<p>
<hr WIDTH="100%">
<h3>
<a NAME="20march"></a>20 MARCH 1561. THOMAS RANDOLPH to Sir WILLIAM CECIL.
[<i>From Berwick on Tweed</i>.]</h3>
Master KNOX in certayne articles geuen vnto my Lord JAMES at this tyme
hath mytigated some what the rigour of his booke, referringe myche vnto
ye tyme that the same was wrytten.
<p><i>State Papers, Scotland, Vol. 6, Art. 37</i>.
<p>
<hr WIDTH="100%">
<h3>
<a NAME="5aug"></a>5 AUG. 1561. JOHN KNOX's second Defence to Queen ELIZABETH.</h3>
Grace from GOD the Father throught our Lord JESUS with perpetuall Encrease
of his holie spiritt.
<p>May it please your maiestie that it is heir certainlie spoken that the
Queen of Scotland [<i>MARY Queen of Scots</i>] travaleht earnestlie to
have a treatise intituled <i>the first blast of the trompett</i> confuted
by the answere of the learned in Diuerse realmes, And farther that she
lauboureht to inflambe the hartes of princes against the writar. And because
that it may appear that your maiestie hath interest, that she myndeht to
trauall with your grace, your graces counsell, and learned men for Judgement
against such a common enemy to women and to thair regiment. It were but
foolishnes to me to prescribe vnto your maiestie what is to be done in
any thing but especialie in such thinges as men suppose Do tuoch my self.
But of on[e] thing I think my self assured and therefor I Dar[e] not conceall
it. To witt that neyther Doht our soueraine so greatlie fear her owen estate
by reasson of that book, neyther yet Doth she so vnfeanedlie fauour the
tranquilitie of your maiesties reing and realme that she wo[u]lde tack
so great and earnest paines onles that her crafty counsall in so Doing
shot att a farther marck.
<p>Two yeres ago I wrote vnto your maiestie my full Declaration tuoching
that work, experience since hath schawen that I am not Desirous of Innovations
[i.e. in <i>Government</i>], so that CHRIST JESUS be not in his members
openlie troden vnder the feitt of the vngodlie. With furthie purgation
I will not trouble your maiestie for the present. Besechinge the Eternall
so to assist your Highnes in all affaires, that in his sight you may be
found acceptable, your regiment profitable to your common wealht, and your
factes [deeds] to be such that Iustlie thei may be praised of all godlie
vnto the cuming of the lord JESUS to whose mighty protection I unfeanedlie
committ your maiestie.
<p>From Edinburgh the 5 of August 1561
<p>Your maiesties suruand to command in godlines
<p><i>Endorsed</i> JOHN KNOX.
<p>To the myghty and excellent princess ELIZABETH the Quenes maiestie of
ENGLAND be these deliuered.
<p><i>State Papers, Scotland, Vol. 6, Art 55.</i>
<p>
<hr WIDTH="100%">
<br><a NAME="private opinion"></a>Despite this triumphant appeal to his
quiet citizenship under MARY STUART, the following description of her mother
shows that the great Scotchman never altered his private opinion on this
subject.
<p>The peace as said is contracted. The Queene Dowager past by sea to F[r]aunce
with gallies that for that purpose were prepared and tooke with her diuerse
of the nobilitie of Scotland. The Earles HUNTLY, GLENCAIRNE, MERSHELL,
CASSILLES. The Lordes MAXWELL, flying, Sir GEORGE DOWGLASSE, together with
all the kings sonnes, and diuerse Barrones, and gentlemen of Ecclesiasticall
estate: the Bishop of GALLOWAY, and manie others, with promise that they
should be rechlie rewarded for their good seruice. What they receaued we
can not tell, but few were made rich at their returning. The Dowager had
to practise somewhat with her brethren, the Duke of GWYSE and the Cardinal
of LORA[I]NE. The weight wherof the gouernour after felt: for shortlie
after his returning, was the gouernour deposed of the gouernement (Iustlie
by GOD, but most iniustlie by man) and she made regent, in the yere of
our Lord 1554. And a crowne put vpon her head, as seemelie a sight (if
men had eyes) as to put a saddle vpon the back of an vnruly cow. And so
beganne she to practise, practise vpon practise, how Fraunce might be aduanced,
hir friends made rich, and she brought to immortall glorie. For that was
her common talke, "So that I may procure the wealth and honour of my friendes,
and a good fame vnto my selfe, I regarde not what GOD doe after with me."
And in verie deede in deepe dissimulation to bring her owne purpose to
effect she passed the common sort of women, as we will after heare. But
yet GOD to whose Gospell she declared her selfe enemie, in the end [did]
frustrate her of her deuises.
<p>The Historic of the <i>Church of Scotland</i>, pp. 192-193. [Ed. 1584].
<p>
<hr width="100%">







<pre>





End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The First Blast of the Trumpet
against the monstrous regiment of Women, by John Knox

*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FIRST BLAST OF THE TRUMPET ***

This file should be named 8trmp10h.htm or 8trmp10h.zip
Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks get a new NUMBER, 8trmp11h.htm
VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, 8trmp10ah.htm

Produced by Steve Schulze, Debra Storr and PG Distributed Proofreaders.
Page scans generously made available by the CWRU Preservation Department
Digital Library.

Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the US
unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we usually do not
keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.

We are now trying to release all our eBooks one year in advance
of the official release dates, leaving time for better editing.
Please be encouraged to tell us about any error or corrections,
even years after the official publication date.

Please note neither this listing nor its contents are final til
midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement.
The official release date of all Project Gutenberg eBooks is at
Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month.  A
preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment
and editing by those who wish to do so.

Most people start at our Web sites at:
http://gutenberg.net or
http://promo.net/pg

These Web sites include award-winning information about Project
Gutenberg, including how to donate, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter (free!).


Those of you who want to download any eBook before announcement
can get to them as follows, and just download by date.  This is
also a good way to get them instantly upon announcement, as the
indexes our cataloguers produce obviously take a while after an
announcement goes out in the Project Gutenberg Newsletter.

http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext03 or
ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/etext03

Or /etext02, 01, 00, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90

Just search by the first five letters of the filename you want,
as it appears in our Newsletters.


Information about Project Gutenberg (one page)

We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work.  The
time it takes us, a rather conservative estimate, is fifty hours
to get any eBook selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright
searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc.   Our
projected audience is one hundred million readers.  If the value
per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2
million dollars per hour in 2002 as we release over 100 new text
files per month:  1240 more eBooks in 2001 for a total of 4000+
We are already on our way to trying for 2000 more eBooks in 2002
If they reach just 1-2% of the world's population then the total
will reach over half a trillion eBooks given away by year's end.

The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away 1 Trillion eBooks!
This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers,
which is only about 4% of the present number of computer users.

Here is the briefest record of our progress (* means estimated):

eBooks Year Month

    1  1971 July
   10  1991 January
  100  1994 January
 1000  1997 August
 1500  1998 October
 2000  1999 December
 2500  2000 December
 3000  2001 November
 4000  2001 October/November
 6000  2002 December*
 9000  2003 November*
10000  2004 January*


The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been created
to secure a future for Project Gutenberg into the next millennium.

We need your donations more than ever!

As of February, 2002, contributions are being solicited from people
and organizations in: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut,
Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois,
Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New
Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South
Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West
Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.

We have filed in all 50 states now, but these are the only ones
that have responded.

As the requirements for other states are met, additions to this list
will be made and fund raising will begin in the additional states.
Please feel free to ask to check the status of your state.

In answer to various questions we have received on this:

We are constantly working on finishing the paperwork to legally
request donations in all 50 states.  If your state is not listed and
you would like to know if we have added it since the list you have,
just ask.

While we cannot solicit donations from people in states where we are
not yet registered, we know of no prohibition against accepting
donations from donors in these states who approach us with an offer to
donate.

International donations are accepted, but we don't know ANYTHING about
how to make them tax-deductible, or even if they CAN be made
deductible, and don't have the staff to handle it even if there are
ways.

Donations by check or money order may be sent to:

Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
PMB 113
1739 University Ave.
Oxford, MS 38655-4109

Contact us if you want to arrange for a wire transfer or payment
method other than by check or money order.

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been approved by
the US Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3) organization with EIN
[Employee Identification Number] 64-622154.  Donations are
tax-deductible to the maximum extent permitted by law.  As fund-raising
requirements for other states are met, additions to this list will be
made and fund-raising will begin in the additional states.

We need your donations more than ever!

You can get up to date donation information online at:

http://www.gutenberg.net/donation.html


***

If you can't reach Project Gutenberg,
you can always email directly to:

Michael S. Hart hart@pobox.com

Prof. Hart will answer or forward your message.

We would prefer to send you information by email.


**The Legal Small Print**


(Three Pages)

***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS**START***
Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers.
They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with
your copy of this eBook, even if you got it for free from
someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our
fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement
disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how
you may distribute copies of this eBook if you want to.

*BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS EBOOK
By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
eBook, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept
this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive
a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this eBook by
sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person
you got it from. If you received this eBook on a physical
medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request.

ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM EBOOKS
This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBooks,
is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor Michael S. Hart
through the Project Gutenberg Association (the "Project").
Among other things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright
on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and
distribute it in the United States without permission and
without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth
below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this eBook
under the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark.

Please do not use the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark to market
any commercial products without permission.

To create these eBooks, the Project expends considerable
efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain
works. Despite these efforts, the Project's eBooks and any
medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other
things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or
corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged
disk or other eBook medium, a computer virus, or computer
codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.

LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES
But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below,
[1] Michael Hart and the Foundation (and any other party you may
receive this eBook from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook) disclaims
all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including
legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR
UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.

If you discover a Defect in this eBook within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any)
you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that
time to the person you received it from. If you received it
on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and
such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement
copy. If you received it electronically, such person may
choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to
receive it electronically.

THIS EBOOK IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS
TO THE EBOOK OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or
the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the
above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you
may have other legal rights.

INDEMNITY
You will indemnify and hold Michael Hart, the Foundation,
and its trustees and agents, and any volunteers associated
with the production and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
texts harmless, from all liability, cost and expense, including
legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the
following that you do or cause:  [1] distribution of this eBook,
[2] alteration, modification, or addition to the eBook,
or [3] any Defect.

DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm"
You may distribute copies of this eBook electronically, or by
disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this
"Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg,
or:

[1]  Only give exact copies of it.  Among other things, this
     requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the
     eBook or this "small print!" statement.  You may however,
     if you wish, distribute this eBook in machine readable
     binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form,
     including any form resulting from conversion by word
     processing or hypertext software, but only so long as
     *EITHER*:

     [*]  The eBook, when displayed, is clearly readable, and
          does *not* contain characters other than those
          intended by the author of the work, although tilde
          (~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may
          be used to convey punctuation intended by the
          author, and additional characters may be used to
          indicate hypertext links; OR

     [*]  The eBook may be readily converted by the reader at
          no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent
          form by the program that displays the eBook (as is
          the case, for instance, with most word processors);
          OR

     [*]  You provide, or agree to also provide on request at
          no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the
          eBook in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC
          or other equivalent proprietary form).

[2]  Honor the eBook refund and replacement provisions of this
     "Small Print!" statement.

[3]  Pay a trademark license fee to the Foundation of 20% of the
     gross profits you derive calculated using the method you
     already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  If you
     don't derive profits, no royalty is due.  Royalties are
     payable to "Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation"
     the 60 days following each date you prepare (or were
     legally required to prepare) your annual (or equivalent
     periodic) tax return.  Please contact us beforehand to
     let us know your plans and to work out the details.

WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO?
Project Gutenberg is dedicated to increasing the number of
public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed
in machine readable form.

The Project gratefully accepts contributions of money, time,
public domain materials, or royalty free copyright licenses.
Money should be paid to the:
"Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."

If you are interested in contributing scanning equipment or
software or other items, please contact Michael Hart at:
hart@pobox.com

[Portions of this eBook's header and trailer may be reprinted only
when distributed free of all fees.  Copyright (C) 2001, 2002 by
Michael S. Hart.  Project Gutenberg is a TradeMark and may not be
used in any sales of Project Gutenberg eBooks or other materials be
they hardware or software or any other related product without
express permission.]

*END THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS*Ver.02/11/02*END*



</pre>

</body>
</html>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2026-02-27 21:58:43 +0000