diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:33:36 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:33:36 -0700 |
| commit | d45d9ba2357de1fe8af89e098df821462777bf9a (patch) | |
| tree | 2525d1933eca017af4d16dd434e61c0983166694 /old/8trmp10h.htm | |
Diffstat (limited to 'old/8trmp10h.htm')
| -rw-r--r-- | old/8trmp10h.htm | 3284 |
1 files changed, 3284 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/old/8trmp10h.htm b/old/8trmp10h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3eefd8b --- /dev/null +++ b/old/8trmp10h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,3284 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> +<html> +<head> + <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> + <meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) [Netscape]"> + <title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of The First Blast of the Trumpet against the monstrous regiment of Women, by John Knox. + </title> +<style type="text/css"> + <!-- + H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { text-align: center; } + // --> + </style> +</head> +<body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The First Blast of the Trumpet against +the monstrous regiment of Women, by John Knox + +Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the +copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing +this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook. + +This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project +Gutenberg file. Please do not remove it. Do not change or edit the +header without written permission. + +Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the +eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is +important information about your specific rights and restrictions in +how the file may be used. You can also find out about how to make a +donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved. + + +**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts** + +**eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971** + +*****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!***** + + +Title: The First Blast of the Trumpet against the monstrous regiment + of Women + +Author: John Knox + +Release Date: January, 2006 [EBook #9660] +[Yes, we are more than one year ahead of schedule] +[This file was first posted on October 14, 2003] + +Edition: 10 + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FIRST BLAST OF THE TRUMPET *** + + + + +Produced by Steve Schulze, Debra Storr and PG Distributed Proofreaders. +Page scans generously made available by the CWRU Preservation Department +Digital Library. + + + + + +</pre> + + +<h1> +The First Blast of the Trumpet against the monstrous regiment of Women.</h1> + +<h3> +The English Scholar's Library etc.</h3> + +<h4> +No. 2.</h4> + +<h4> +1558.</h4> + +<h4> +Edited by EDWARD ARBER, F.S.A., etc.,</h4> + +<h4> +LECTURER IN ENGLISH LITERATURE, ETC., UNIVERSITY COLLEGE, LONDON. SOUTHGATE, +LONDON, N.</h4> + +<h4> +15 August 1878.</h4> + +<h4> +No. 2.</h4> + +<h4> +(All rights reserved.)</h4> +[Transcribers Note: The image source for this book was a .pdf of the above +edition. The production of the pdf seems to have generated some errors +e.g. royal1 for royall. Such errors have been fixed but otherwise +the text aims to be true to the printed book.] +<br> +<hr WIDTH="100%"> +<h1> +CONTENTS.</h1> +<a NAME="biblio"></a><a href="#bibliography">Bibliography</a> +<p><a NAME="intro"></a><a href="#introduction">INTRODUCTION</a> +<p><a NAME="extracts"></a><a href="#etxracts">Extracts from Mr. DAVID LAING'S +Preface</a> +<hr> +<h2> +<a NAME="preface"></a><a href="#kingdome">The First Blast of the Trumpet +&c.</a></h2> + +<h3> +<a href="#kingdome">THE PREFACE.</a></h3> +The wonderful silence of the godly and zealous preachers, the learned men +and of grave judgment, now in exile, that they do not admonish the inhabitants +of "greate Brittanny" how abominable before GOD is the Empire or Rule of +Wicked Woman, yea, of a traitress and bastard. +<p>This is contrary to the examples of the ancient prophets. +<p>I am assured that GOD hath revealed unto some in this our age, that +it is more than a monster in nature that a Woman shall reign and have empire +above Man. +<h3> +<a NAME="aansobj"></a><a href="#kingobj">ANSWERS TO THE OBJECTIONS</a></h3> +Why no such doctrine ought to be published in these our dangerous days. +<p>(a) <i>It may seem to tend to sedition</i>. +<p>(b) <i>It shall be dangerous not only to the writer or publisher, but +to all as shall read the writings, or favour this truth spoken</i>. +<p>(c) <i>It shall not amend the chief offenders, because</i> +<blockquote><i>1. It shall never come to their ears</i> +<p><i>2. They will not be admonished</i>.</blockquote> +If any think that the Empire of Women is not of such importance that for +the surpressing of the same any man is bound to hazard his life: I answer, +that to suppress it, is in the hand of GOD alone; but to utter the impiety +and abomination of the same, I say, it is the duty of every true messenger +of GOD to whom the truth is revealed in that behalf. +<h2> +<a NAME="ablast"></a><a href="#first blast">The First Blast to awake Women +degenerate.</a></h2> + +<h3> +<a href="#first blast">THE DECLAMATION.</a></h3> +<i>The</i> Proposition. To promote a Woman to bear rule, superiority, dominion +or empire above any realm, nation or city is +<blockquote>A. Repugnant to nature. +<p>B. Contumely to GOD. +<p>C. The subversion of good order, of all equity and justice.</blockquote> +A. Men illuminated only by the light of nature have seen and determined +that it is a thing most repugnant to nature, that Women rule and govern +over men. +<p>B. 1. Woman in her greatest perfection was made to serve and obey man, +not to rule and command him. +<p>2. After the fall, she was made subject to man by the irrevocable sentence +of GOD. In which sentence there are two parts. +<blockquote>(a) A dolour, anguish and pain as oft as ever she shall be +a mother. +<p>(b) A subjection of her self, her appetites and will to her husband +and his will.</blockquote> +From the former part of this malediction can neither art, nobility, policy +nor law made by man deliver women: but, alas, ignorance of GOD, ambition +and tyranny have studied to abolish and destroy the second part of GOD's +punishment. +<p>3. This subjection, understood by many to be that of the wife to the +husband, is extended by Saint PAUL to women in general To which consent +TERTULLIAN, AUGUSTINE, AMBROSE, CHRYSOSTOM, BASIL +<p>4. The two other Mirrors, in which we may behold the order of Nature. +<blockquote>(a) The natural body of man +<p>(b) The civil body of that Commonwealth [of the Jews] in which GOD by +his own word hath appointed an order.</blockquote> +C. The Empire of a Woman is a thing repugnant to justice, and the destruction +of every commonwealth where it is received. +<blockquote>(a) If justice be a constant and perpetual will to give to +every person their own right: then to give or to will to give to any person +that which is not their right, must repugn to justice. But to reign above +Man can never be the right to Woman: because it is a thing denied unto +her by GOD, as is before declared. +<p>(b) Whatsoever repugneth to the will of GOD expressed in His most sacred +word, repugneth to justice. That Women have authority over Men repugneth +to the will of GOD expressed in His word. Therefore all such authority +repugneth to justice.</blockquote> + +<h3> +<a NAME="ablastobj"></a><a href="#firstobj">ANSWERS TO OBJECTIONS.</a></h3> +1. <i>The examples of DEBORAH [Judges iv. 4] and HULDAH [2 Kings xxii 14</i>.] +<p>2. <i>The law of MOSES for the daughters of ZELOPHEHAD [Numb. xxvii. +7, and xxxvi. 11</i>] +<p>3. <i>The consent of the Estates of such realms as have approved the +Empire and Regiment of Women</i>. +<p>4 [<i>The long custom which hath received the Regiment of Women. The +valiant acts and prosperity. Together with some Papistical laws which have +confirmed the same</i>. +<p>*<sup>*</sup>* This objection was not directly replied to; but instead, +the two following ones.] +<blockquote>(a) <i>Albeit Women may not absolutely reign by themselves; +because they may neither sit in judgment, neither pronounce sentence, neither +execute any public office: yet may they do all such things by their Lieutenants, +Deputies, and Judges substitutes</i>. +<p>(b) <i>A woman born to rule over any realm, may choose her a husband; +and to him she may transfer and give her authority and right</i>.</blockquote> + +<h3> +<a NAME="aadmon"></a><a href="#admonition">THE ADMONITION.</a></h3> +And now to put an end to the First Blast. Seeing that by the Order of Nature; +by the malediction and curse pronounced against Woman; by the mouth of +Saint PAUL, the interpreter of GOD's sentence; by the example of that Commonwealth +in which GOD by His word planted order and policy; and finally, by the +judgment of the most godly writers: GOD hath dejected women from rule, +dominion, empire and authority above man. Moreover, seeing that neither +the example of DEBORAH, neither the law made for the daughters of ZELOPHEHAD, +neither yet the foolish consent of an ignorant multitude: be able to justify +that which GOD so plainly hath condemned. Let all men take heed what quarrel +and cause from henceforth they do defend. If GOD raise up any noble heart +to vindicate the liberty of his country and to suppress the monstrous Empire +of Women: let all such as shall presume to defend them in the same, most +certainly know; that in so doing they lift their hand against GOD, and +that one day they shall find His power to fight against their foolishness. +<h2> +<a NAME="areader"></a><a href="#to the reader">JOHN KNOX to the Reader</a></h2> + +<h3> +<a NAME="aapendix"></a><a href="#appendix">APPENDIX.</a></h3> + +<h4> +1559.</h4> +<a href="#12july">12 July. JOHN KNOX to Sir WILLIAM CECIL</a> +<p><a href="#20july">20 July. JOHN KNOX'S Declaration to Queen ELIZABETH</a> +<h4> +1561.</h4> +<a href="#20march">20 Mar. THOMAS RANDOLPH to Sir WILLIAM CECIL</a> +<p><a href="#5aug">5 Aug. JOHN KNOX'S Second Defence to Queen ELIZABETH</a> +<p><a href="#private opinion">Extracts from JOHN KNOX'S History of the +Church of Scotland</a> +<p> +<hr width="100%"> +<br> +<h1> +<a NAME="bibliography"></a><i><a href="#biblio">BIBLIOGRAPHY.</a></i></h1> + +<h2> +<i>The First Blast of the Trumpet etc.</i></h2> + +<h3> +ISSUES IN THE AUTHOR'S LIFETIME.</h3> + +<h4> +A. <i>As a separate publication</i>.</h4> +1. 1558. [i.e. early in that year at Geneva. 8vo.] See title at p. 1. +<h4> +B. <i>With other Works.</i></h4> +None known. +<h3> +ISSUES SINCE HIS DEATH.</h3> + +<h4> +A. <i>As a separate publication</i>.</h4> +2. [?1687? Edinburgh.] 8vo. The First Blast of the Trumpet against the +monstrous Regimen[t] of Women. +<p>4. 15. Aug. 1878. Southgate London N. +<blockquote><i>English Scholar's Library</i>. The present impression.</blockquote> + +<h4> +B. <i>With other Works</i>.</h4> +1846-1848. Edinburgh. 8vo. <i>Bannatyne Club</i>. The Works of JOHN KNOX. +<blockquote>Collected and edited by DAVID LAING. In 6 Vols. A special and +limited edition of 112 copies of the First Two Volumes was struck off for +this Printing Club.</blockquote> +1846-1848. Edinburgh. 8vo. <i>Wodrow Club</i>. +<blockquote>The same Two Volumes issued to this Society.</blockquote> +1854-1864. Edinburgh. 8vo. +<blockquote>The remaining Four Volumes published by Mr. T. G. STEVENSON. +The First Blast &c. is at Vol. iv. 349.</blockquote> + +<h2> +Early Replies to the First Blast etc.</h2> +1. 26 Apr. 1559. Strasburgh. 4to. [JOHN AYLMER, afterwards Bishop of LONDON]. +<blockquote>An Harborovve for faithfull and trewe subiectes, agaynst the +late blowne Blaste, concerninge the Gouernmente of VVemen wherin he confuted +all such reasons as a straunger of late made in that behalfe, with a breife +exhortation to Obedience. Anno. M.D. lix. +<p>[This calling John Knox a "stranger" sounds to us like a piece of impudence, +but may bring home to us that Scotland was then to Englishmen a foreign +country.]</blockquote> +2. 1565-6. Antwerp. 8vo. PETRUS FRARINUS, M.A. +<blockquote>Oration against the Vnlawfull Insurrections of the Protestantes +of our time, under the pretence to refourme religion. +<p>Made and pronounced in the Schole of Artes at Louaine, the xiiij of +December. Anno 1565. And now translated into English with the aduise of +the Author. Printed by JOHN FOWLER in 1566. +<p>The references to KNOX and GOODMAN are at E. vj and F. ij. At the end +of this work is a kind of Table of Contents, each reference being illustrated +with a woodcut depicting the irightful cruelties with which the Author +in the text charges the Protestants. One woodcut is a curious representation +of GOODMAN and NOKES. +<p>Doctor FULKE wrote a <i>Confutation</i> of this work.</blockquote> +3. 1579. Paris. 8vo. DAVID CHAMBERS of Ormond. +<blockquote>Histoire abregée de tous les Roys de France, Angleterre +et Escosse, etc. In three Parts, each with a separate Title page. +<p>The Third Part is dated 21 August 1573; is dedicated to CATHERINE DE +MEDICI; and is entitled +<p>Discours de la legitime succession des femmes aux possessions de leurs +parens: et du gouernement des princesses aux Empires et Royaumes.</blockquote> +4. 1584. [Printed abroad]. 8vo. JOHN LESLEY, Bishop of ROSS. +<blockquote>A treatise towching the right, title and interest of the most +Excellent Princesse MARIE, Queen of Scotland, And of the most noble King +JAMES, her Graces sonne, to the succession of the Crowne of England. ... +Compiled ahd published before in Latin, and after in English. The Blast +is alluded to at C. 2.</blockquote> +5. 1590. [Never printed.] Lord HENRY HOWARD [created Earl of NORTHAMPTON +13 March 1604.], a voluminous writer, but few of whose writings ever came +to the press. +<blockquote>A dutifull defence of the lawfull Regiment of women deuided +into three bookes. The first conteyneth reasons and examples grounded on +the law of nature. The second reasons and examples grownded on the Ciuile +lawes. The third reasons and examples grounded on the sacred lawes of god +with an awnswer to all false and friuolous obiections which haue bene most +vniustlie cowntenaunced with deceitfull coulores forced oute of theis lawes +in disgrace of their approued and sufficient authorytie. <i>Lansd. MS</i>. +813 and <i>Harl. MS</i>. 6257.</blockquote> + +<hr width="100%"> +<h1> +<a NAME="introduction"></a><a href="#intro">INTRODUCTION.</a></h1> +At the time this tract was written the destinies, immediate and prospective, +of the Protestant faith seemed to lay wholly in the laps of five women, +viz:-- +<p>CATHERINE DE MEDICI, Queen of France. +<p>MARIE DE LORRAINE, Queen Regent of Scotland, whose sole heir was her +daughter MARY, afterwards Queen of Scots. +<p>MARY TUDOR, Queen of England, having for her heir apparent the Princess +ELIZABETH. +<p>Of these, the last--also of least account at this moment, being in confinement--was +the only hope of the Reformers. The other four, largely directing the affairs +of three kingdoms, were steadfastly hostile to the new faith. Truly, the +odds were heavy against it. Who could have anticipated that within three +years of the writing of this book both MARY TUDOR and MARY DE LORRAINE +would have passed away; that KNOX himself would have been in Scotland carrying +on the Reformation; and that ELIZABETH would have commenced her marvellous +reign. So vast a change in the political world was quite beyond all reasonable +foresight. +<p>Meanwhile there was only present to the vision and heart of the Reformer +as he gazed seaward, from Dieppe, but the unceasing blaze of, the martyr +fires spreading from Smithfield all over England. Month after month this +horrid work was deliberately carried on and was increasing in intensity. +<blockquote>We se our countrie set furthe for a pray to foreine nations, +we heare the blood of our brethren, the membres of Christ Iesus most cruellie +to be shed, and the monstruous empire of a cruell women (the secrete counsel +of God excepted) we knowe to be the onlie occasion of all the miseries: +and yet with silence we passe the time as thogh the mater did nothinge +appertein to vs. p. 3.</blockquote> +The vigour of the persecution had struck all heart out of the Protestants. +Was this to go on for ever? Heart-wrung at the ruthless slaughter--as we, +in our day, have been by the horrors of the Indian mutiny or of the Bulgarian +atrocities---the Reformer sought to know the occasion of all these calamities. +At that moment, he found it in the Empire of Woman. Afterwards he referred +much of this book to the time in which it was written [pp. 58 and 61]. +Shall we say that his heart compelled his head to this argument, that his +indignation entangled his understanding on this subject? Just as MILTON +was led to the discussion of the conditions of divorce, through his desertion +by his wife MARY POWELL; so the fiery martyrdoms of England led KNOX to +denounce the female sex in the person of her whom we still call "Bloody +MARY" that was the occasion of them all. +<p>If in the happiest moment of his happiest dream, JOHN KNOX could have +foreseen our good and revered Queen VICTORIA reigning in the hearts of +the millions of her subjects, and ruling an Empire wider by far than those +of Spain and Portugal in his day; if he could have seen England and Scotland +ONE COUNTRY, bearing the name which, as almost of prophecy, he has foreshadowed +for them in this tract, "the Ile of greate Britanny;" if he could have +beheld that one country as it now abides in its strength and its wealth, +the most powerful of European states; if he could have realized free Italy +with Rome, the Popes without temporal power, and modern civilisation more +than a match for Papal intrigues; if he could have known that the gospel +for which he lived had regenerated the social life of Great Britain, that +it was tha confessed basis of our political action and the perennial spring +of our Christian activities, so that not merely in physical strength, but +in moral, force and mental enlightenment we are in the van of the nations +of the world: if the great Scotch Reformer had but had a glimpse of this +present reality, this tract would never have been written, and he would +willingly have sung the paean of aged SIMEON and passed out of this life. +<p>But this work was the offspring of the hour of darkness, if not of despair. +Something must be done. A warrior of the pen, he would forge a general +argument against all female rule that would inclusively destroy the legal +right of MARY to continue these atrocities. +<h2> +II.</h2> +The first note of this trumpet blast, "The Kingdom apperteineth to our +GOD," shows us the vast difference between the way in which men regarded +the Almighty Being then and now. Shall we say that the awe of the Deity +has departed! Now so much stress is laid on the Fatherhood of GOD: in KNOX'S +time it was His might to defend His own or to take vengeance on all their +murderers. Both views are true. Nevertheless this age does seem wanting +in a general and thorough reverence for His great name and character. +<p>KNOX seems like some great Hebrew seer when he thus pronounces the doom +of MARY and her adherents. +<blockquote>The same God, who did execute this greuous punishment, euen +by the handes of those, whom he suffred twise to be ouercomen in batel, +doth this day retein his power and iustice. Cursed Iesabel of England, +with the pestilent and detestable generation of papistes, make no litle +bragge and boast, that they haue triumphed not only against Wyet, but also +against all such as haue entreprised any thing against them or their procedinges. +But let her and them consider, that yet they haue not preuailed against +god, his throne is more high, then that the length of their hornes be able +to reache. And let them further consider, that in the beginning of their +bloodie reigne, the haruest of their iniquitie was not comen to full maturitie +and ripenes. No, it was so grene, so secret I meane, so couered, and so +hid with hypocrisie, that some men (euen the seruantes of God) thoght it +not impossible, but that wolues might be changed in to lambes, and also +that the vipere might remoue her natural venom. But God, who doth reuele +in his time apointed the secretes of hartes, and that will haue his iudgementes +iustified euen by the verie wicked, hath now geuen open testimonie of her +and their beastlie crueltie. For man and woman, learned and vnlearned, +nobles and men of baser sorte, aged fathers and tendre damiselles, and +finailie the bones of the dead, as well women as men haue tasted of their +tyrannie, so that now not onlie the blood of father Latimer, of the milde +man of God the bishop of Cantorburie, of learned and discrete Ridley, of +innocent ladie Iane dudley, and many godly and worthie preachers, that +can not be forgotten, such as fier hath consumed, and the sworde of tyrannie +moste vniustlie hath shed, doth call for vengeance in the eares of the +Lord God of hostes: but also the sobbes and teares of the poore oppressed, +the groninges of the angeles, the watch men of the Lord, yea and euerie +earthlie creature abused by their tyrannie do continuallie crie and call +for the hastie execution of the same. I feare not to say, that the day +of vengeance, whiche shall apprehend that horrible monstre Iesabal of England, +and suche as maintein her monstruous crueltie, is alredie apointed in the +counsel of the Eternall; and I verelie, beleue that it is so nigh, that +she shall not reigne so long in tyrannie, as hitherto she hath done, when +God shall declare him selfe to be her ennemie, when he shall poure furth +contempt vpon her, according to her crueltie, and shal kindle the hartes +of such, as sometimes did fauor her with deadly hatred against her, that +they may execute his iudgementes. And therfore let such as assist her, +take hede what they do.</blockquote> + +<h2> +III.</h2> +There are some notable incidental matters in this tract. +<p>First in matters of State. As +<blockquote>The spaniardes are Iewes and they bragge that Marie of England +is the roote of Iesse. p. 46.</blockquote> +That most important testimony that the Reformation under EDWARD VI was +mainly the work of the King and his court; as it had been in the days of +his father HENRY VIII. +<blockquote>For albeit thou diddest not cease to heape benefit vpon benefit, +during the reigne of an innocent and tendre king, yet no man did acknowledge +thy potent hand and meruelouse working. The stoute courage of capitaines, +the witte and policie of counselers, the learning of 'bishoppes[1], did +robbe the of thy glorie and honor. For what then was heard, as concerning +religion, but the kinges procedinges, the kinges procedinges must be obeyed? +It is enacted by parliament: therefore it is treason to speake in the contrarie. +p. 30.</blockquote> +The political shrewdness of the Writer on the entanglement of England in +the Spanish War against France, whereby we lost Calais on the 6th January +1558. +<blockquote>They see their owne destruction, and yet they haue no grace +to auoide it. Yea they are becomen so blinde, that knowing the pit, they +headlong cast them selues into the same, as the nobilitie[2] of England, +do this day, fighting in the defense of their mortall ennemie the Spaniard. +Finallie they are so destitute of vnderstanding and iudgement, that althogh +they knowe that there is a libertie and fredome, the whiche their predecessors +haue inioyed; yet are they compelled to bowe their neckes vnder the yoke +of Satan, and of his proude ministres, pestilent papistes and proude spaniardes. +And yet can they not consider that where a woman reigneth and papistes +beare authoritie, that there must nedes Satan be president of the counsel, +p. 31.</blockquote> +The absence of any specific allusion to Calais shows that this book was +wholly written before its capture. +<p>Next, in the imagery with which he expresses his insight into the nature +of things. As +<blockquote>It is a thing verie difficile to a man, (be he neuer so constant) +promoted to honors, not to be tickled some what with pride (for +<br>the winde of vaine glorie doth easelie carie vp the, drie dust of the +earth). p. 19. +<p>The wise, politic, and quiet spirites of this world, p. 8.</blockquote> + +<blockquote>The veritie of God[3] is of that nature, that at one time or +at other, it will pourchace to it selfe audience. It is an odour and smell, +that can not be suppressed, yea it is a trumpet that will sound in despite +of the adversarie.</blockquote> +Lastly, the marvellous lashing of women, throughout: climaxing in +<blockquote>Woman ... the porte and gate of the deuil.</blockquote> + +<hr width="100%"> +<h2> +IV.</h2> +This work is therefore to us rather "the groaning of this angel," this +"watchman of the LORD" at the national subjection, the fiery martyrdoms, +"the sobs and tears of the poor oppressed;" than the expression of any +fundamental principle on which GOD has constituted human society. Intellectually, +there is partiality, forgetfulness and disproportion in the argument. It +applies as much to a Man as to a Woman, and more to a wicked than a good +Woman. He started on the assumption that almost all women in authority +were wicked. Time however alters many things; and he lived to love and +reverence Queen ELIZABETH. +<p>So these trumpet notes are the outpouring of a very great nature, if +not of a great thinker; of one whose absolute and dauntless devotion to +GOD, to truth, to right, whose burning indignation against wrong-doing +and faith in the Divine vengeance to overtake it, fitted him to do a giant's +work in the Reformation, and will enshrine his memory in the affection +of all good men till time shall end. +<p>[Marginal Note 1: what robbed God of his honor in England in the time +of the Gospell.] +<p>[Marginal Note 2: The nobilitie and the hole realme of England, caste +themselves willing in to the pit.] +<p>[Marginal Note 3: The propertie of Goddes truth.] +<p> +<hr width="100%"> +<h1> +<a NAME="etxracts"></a><a href="#extracts">EXTRACTS FROM MR. DAVID LAING'S +PREFACE.</a></h1> +With some other hints, gratefully acknowledged. +<p>Of the various writings of the Reformer, no one was the occasion of +exciting greater odium than his <i>First Blast against the monstrous Regiment +or Government of Women</i>. Unlike all his other publications, it appeared +anonymously, although he had no intention of ultimately concealing his +name. His purpose was, as he tells us, "Thrice to Blow the Trumpet in the +same matter, if GOD so permit," and, on the last occasion, to announce +himself as the writer, to prevent any blame being imputed to others. This +intention, it is well known, was never carried into effect. That KNOX'S +views were in harmony with those of his colleagues, GOODMAN, WHITTINGHAM, +and GILBY, need hardly be stated: but the reception of the little work +fully confirmed the Author's opinion, that it would not escape "the reprehension +of many." This may in a great measure be attributed to the course of public +events within a few months of its publication. +<p>The subject of Female Government had engaged his attention at an earlier +period. One of his Questions submitted to BULLINGER in 1554 was "Whether +a Female can preside over, and rule a kingdom by divine right?" And in +answer to some doubts regarding the Apparel of Women, he himself says that +"if women take upon them the office which GOD hath assigned to men, they +shall not escape the Divine malediction." In his <i>Additions</i> to the +<i>Apology +for The Protestants in prison at Paris</i>, he expresses his conviction +that the government of Princes had come to that state of iniquity that +"no godly person can enjoy office or authority under them." This assertion +indeed was not specially applicable to Female government, but his feelings +in reference to the persecutions in England under MARY, and in Scotland +under the Queen Regent, impelled him to treat of a subject which all others +at the time seemed most sedulously to avoid. +<p>His First <i>Blast</i> was probably written at Dieppe towards the end +of 1557; and it was printed early in the following year at Geneva, as is +apparent upon comparison with other books from the press of JOHN CRESPIN +in that city. +<p>A copy of the work having been sent to JOHN FOX, then residing at Basle, +he wrote "a loving and friendly letter" to the author, in which he expostulates +with him on the impropriety of the publication. In KNOX'S reply, dated +the 18th of May 1558, he says, he will not excuse "his rude vehemencie +and inconsidered affirmations, which may appear rather to proceed from +choler than of zeal or reason." "To me," he adds, "it <i>is</i> enough +to say, that black is not white, an'd man's tyranny and foolishness is +not GOD's perfect ordinance." +<p>The similar work of GOODMAN on <i>Obedience to Superior</i> Powers which +appeared at Geneva about the same time, was also suggested by the persecuting +spirit which then prevailed. But both works were published somewhat unseasonably, +as such questions on <i>Government</i> and <i>Obedience</i>, it is justly +observed, might have been more fitly argued when a King happened to fill +the throne. The terms used by GOODMAN in reference to MARY, Queen of England, +are not less violent than unseemly. She died on the 17th of November 1558, +and her successor regarded the authors of those works with the utmost dislike; +although neither of them, in their writings, had any special reference +or the least intention of giving offence to Queen ELIZABETH.... +<p>That these works, and every person supposed to entertain similar sentiments, +should be regarded with marked aversion by Queen ELIZABETH, need excite +no surprise. +<p>In the beginning of the year 1559, CALVIN having revised and republished +his <i>Commentaries</i> on <i>ISAIAH</i>, originally dedicated to EDWARD +VI. in 1551; he addressed the work in a printed Epistle to Her Majesty: +but his messenger brought him back word that his homage was not kindly +received by Her Majesty, because she had been offended with him by reason +of some writings published with his approbation at Geneva. +<p>CALVIN felt so greatly annoyed at this imputation, that he addressed +a letter<a NAME="FNanchor1"></a><sup><a href="#Footnote1">[1]</a></sup> +to Sir WILLIAM CECIL, in which he expresses himself with no small degree +of asperity on the subject of KNOX'S First B<i>last</i>. He says-- +<blockquote>Two years ago [i.e. <i>in</i> 1557] JOHN KNOX asked of me, +in a private conversation, what I thought about the Government of Women. +I candidly replied, that as it was a deviation from the original and proper +order of nature, it was to be ranked, no less than slavery, among the punishments +consequent +upon the fall of man: but that there were occasionally women so endowed, +that the singular good qualities which shone forth in them made it evident +that they were raised up by Divine authority; either that GOD designed +by such examples to condemn the inactivity of men, or for the better setting +forth of His own glory. I brought forth Huldah and Deborah; and added, +that GOD did not vainly promise by the mouth of Isaiah that "Queens should +be nursing mothers of the Church"; by which prerogative it is very evident +that they are distinguished from females in private life. I came at length +to this conclusion, that since, both by custom, and public consent, and +long practice, it hath been established, that realms and principalities +may descend to females by hereditary right, it did not appear to me necessary +to move the question, not only because the thing would be most invidious; +but because in my opinion it would not be lawful to unsettle governments +which are ordained by the peculiar providence of GOD. +<p>I had no suspicion of the book, and for a whole year was ignorant of +its publication. When I was informed of it by certain parties, I sufficiently +shewed my displeasure that such paradoxes should be published; but as the +remedy was too late, I thought that the evil, which could not now be corrected, +should rather be buried in oblivion than made a matter of agitation. +<p>Inquire also at your father in law [Sir ANTHONY COOKE] what my reply +was, when he informed me of the circumstance through Beza. And MARY was +still living, so that I could not be suspected of flattery. +<p>What the books contain, I cannot tell; but KNOX himself will allow that +my conversation with him was no other than what I have now stated.</blockquote> +Calvin then proceeds to say, that great confusion might have arisen by +any decided opposition, and there would have been cause to fear, that in +such a case-- +<blockquote>By reason of the thoughtless arrogance of one individual, the +wretched crowd of exiles would have been driven away, not only from this +city [of Geneva] but even from almost the whole world.</blockquote> +Some years later, and subsequent to CALVIN'S death, BEZA, in a letter to +BULLINGER, adverts to Queen ELIZABETH'S continued dislike to the +<br>Church of Geneva. In his letter, dated the 3rd of September 1566, he +says-- +<blockquote>Some years later, and subsequent to CALVIN'S death, BEZA, in +a letter to BULLINGER, adverts to Queen ELIZABETH'S continued dislike to +the Church of Geneva. In his letter, dated the 3rd of September 1566, he +says-- For as to our Church, I would have you know +that it is so hateful +<br>For as to our Church, I would have you know that it is so hateful to +the Queen [of England], that on this account she has never said a single +word in acknowledgement of the gift of my <i>Annotations [on the New Testament]</i>. +The reason of her dislike is twofold; one, because we are accounted too +severe and precise, which is very displeasing to those who fear reproof; +the other is, because formerly, though without our knowledge, during the +lifetime of Queen MARY, two books were published here in the English language, +one by Master KNOX against the <i>Government of Women</i>, the other by +Master GOODMAN on the <i>Rights of the Magistrate</i>. As soon as we learned +the contents of each, we were much displeased, and their sale was forbidden +in consequence; but she, notwithstanding, cherishes the opinion she +has taken into her head<a NAME="FNanchor2"></a><sup><a href="#Footnote2">[2]</a></sup>.</blockquote> +<a NAME="Footnote1"></a><a href="#FNanchor1">[1] </a> The letter is +not dated, but it was subsequent to one written on the 29th of January +1559 [i.e. 1560], <i>Zurich Letters</i>. Second Series, p. 35. +<br><a NAME="Footnote2"></a><a href="#FNanchor2">[2] </a> <i>Zurich +Letters</i>. Second Series, p. 34. +<p> +<hr width="100%"> +<h1> +<a NAME="first blast"></a><a NAME="kingdome"></a><a href="#preface">THE +FIRST BLAST OF THE TRUMPET AGAINST THE MONSTRVOVS REGIMENT OF WOMEN.</a></h1> + +<h2> +Veritas temporis filia,</h2> + +<h3> +M. D. LVIII.</h3> + +<hr width="100%"> +<h1> +THE KINGDOME APPERTEINETH TO OVR GOD.</h1> + +<table CELLSPACING=15 > +<tr> +<td>Wonder it is, that amongest so many pregnant wittes as the Ile of greate +Brittanny hath produced, so many godlie and zelous preachers as England +did somtime norishe, and amongest so many learned and men of graue iudgement, +as this day by Iesabel are exiled, none is found so stowte of courage, +so faithfull to God, nor louing to their natiue countrie, that they dare +admonishe the inhabitantes of that Ile how abominable before God, is the +Empire or Rule of a wicked woman, yea of a traiteresse and bastard. And +what may a people or nation left destitute of a lawfull head, do by the +authoritie of Goddes worde in electing and appointing common rulers and +magistrates. That Ile (alas) for the contempt and horrible abuse of Goddes +mercies offred, and for the shamefull reuolting to Satan frome Christ Iesus, +and frome his Gospell ones professed, doth iustlie merite to be left in +the handes of their own counsel, and so to come to confusion and bondage +of strangiers. But yet I feare that this vniuersall negligence<a NAME="amn1"></a><sup><a href="amn1">[a]</a></sup> +of such as somtimes were estemed watchemen, shall rather aggrauate our +former ingratitude, then excuse this our vniuersall and vngodlie silence, +in so weightie a mater. We se our countrie set furthe for a pray to foreine +nations, we heare the blood of our brethren, the membres of Christ Iesus +most cruellie to be shed, and the monstruous empire of a cruell woman (the +secrete counsel of God excepted) we knowe to be the onlie occasion of all +these miseries: and yet with silence we passe the time as thogh the mater +did nothinge appertein to vs. But the contrarie examples of the auncient +prophetes<a NAME="amn2"></a><sup><a href="#mn2">[b]</a></sup> moue me to +doubte of this our fact. For Israel did vniuersalie decline frome God by +embrasing idolatrie vnder Ieroboam. In whiche they did continue euen vnto +the destruction of their common welthe<a NAME="amn3"></a><sup><a href="#mn3">[c]</a></sup>. +And Iuda withe Ierusalem did followe the vile superstition and open iniquitie +of Samaria<a NAME="amn4"></a><sup><a href="#mn4">[d]</a></sup>. But yet +ceased not the prophetes of God to admonishe the one and the other: Yea +euen after that God had poured furthe his plagues vpon them<a NAME="amn5"></a><sup><a href="#mn5">[e]</a></sup>. +For Ieremie did write to the captiues of Babylon, and did correct their +errors, plainlie instructing them, who did remaine in the middest of that +idolatrouse nation. Ezechie<a NAME="amn6"></a>l<sup><a href="#mn6">[f]</a></sup> +frome the middest of his brethren prisoners in Chaldea, did write his vision +to those that were in Ierusalem, and sharplie rebukinge their vices, assured +them that they shuld not escape the vengeance of God by reason of their +abominations committed.</td> + +<td><a NAME="mn1"></a><i><a href="#amn1">[a]</a>: the Negligence of watchemen.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn2"></a><i><a href="#amn2">[b]</a>: The diligence of the olde +prophetes of God.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn3"></a><i><a href="#amn3">[c]</a>: I. Reg. 12.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn4"></a><i><a href="#amn4">[d]</a>: Ezech. 16.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn5"></a><i><a href="#amn5">[e]</a>: Ierem. 29.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn6"></a><i><a href="#amn6">[f]</a>: Ezech. 7,8,9.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>The same prophetes for comfort of the afflicted and chosen saintes +of God, who did lie hyd amongest the reprobate of that age<a NAME="amn7"></a><sup><a href="amn7">[g]</a></sup> +(as commonlie doth the corne amongest the chaffe) did prophecie and before +speake the changes of kingdomes, the punishmentes of tyrannes, and the +vengeance<a NAME="amn8"></a><sup><a href="#mn8">[h]</a></sup> whiche God +wold execute vpon the oppressors of his people. The same did Daniel and +the rest of the prophetes euerie one in their season. By whose examples +and by the plaine precept, which is geuen to Ezechiel, commanding him that +he shall say to the wicked: Thou shalt die the death. We in this our miserable +age are bounde to admonishe<a NAME="amn9"></a><sup><a href="#mn8">[i]</a></sup> +the world and the tyrannes thereof, of their sodeine destruction, to assure +them, and to crie vnto them, whether they list to heare or not. That the +blood of the saintes, which by them is shed, continuallie crieth and craueth<a NAME="amn10"></a><sup><a href="#mn10">[j] +</a></sup>vengeance +in the presence of the Lorde of hostes. And further it is our dutie to +open the truthe reueled vnto vs, vnto the ignorant and blind world, vnlest +that to our owne condemnation we list to wrap vp and and hyde the talent +committed to our charge. I am assured that God hath reueled to some in +this our age, that it is more then a monstre in nature, that a woman shall +reigne and haue empire aboue man. And yet with vs all, there is suche silence, +as if God therewith were nothing offended. The naturall man, ennemy to +God shall fynd, I knowe, many causes why no suche doctrine oght to be published +in these our dangerous dayes. First, for that it may seme to tend to sedition<a NAME="amn11"></a><sup><a href="#mn11">[k]</a></sup>: +secondarilie, it shal be dangerous, not onlie to the writer or publisher, +but also to all such as shall reade the writinges, or fauor this truth +spoken: and last it shall not amend the chief offenders, partlie because +it shall neuer come to their eares, and partlie because they will not be +admonished in such cases. I answer, yf any of these be a sufficient reason +that a truth knowen shalbe conceled, then were the auncient prophetes of +God very fooles, who did not better prouide for their owne quietnes, then +to hasard their liues for rebuking of vices, and for the opening of such +crimes, as were not knowen to the world, And Christ Iesus did iniurie to +his Apostles, commanding them to preache repentance and remission of synnes +in his name to euerie realme and nation. And Paule did not vnderstand his +owne libertie, when he cried, wo be to me, if I preache not the Euangile. +Yf feare, I say, of persecution<a NAME="amn12"></a><sup><a href="#mn13">[l]</a></sup>, +of sclander, or of any inconuenience before named might have excused, and +discharged the seruantes of God<a NAME="amn13"></a><sup><a href="#mn13">[m]</a></sup>, +from plainlie rebuking the sinnes of the world; iuste cause had euerie +one of them to haue ceased frome their office. For sodeinlie their doctrine +was accused by termes of sedition, of newe learning, and of treason: persecution +and vehement trouble did shortlie come vpon the professours with the preachers<a NAME="amn14"></a><sup><a href="#mn14">[n]</a></sup>: +kinges, princes and worldlie rulers did conspire against God and against +his anoynted Christ Iesus. But what? Did any of these moue the prophetes +and Apostles to faynt in their vocation? no. But by the resistance, whiche +the deuill made to them by his suppostes, were they the more inflamed to +publishe the truthe reueled vnto them and to witnesse with their blood, +that greuous condemnation and Goddes heuie vengeance shuld folowe the proude +contempt of graces offred. The fidelitie, bold courage, and constancie +of those that are passed before vs, oght to prouoke vs to folowe their +footsteppes, onles we loke for an other kingdome then Christ hath promised +to such as perseuere in profession of his name to the end. Yf any think +that the empire of women, is not of such importance, that for the suppressing +of the same, any man is bounde to hasarde his life, I answer, that to suppresse +it, is in the hand of god alone. But to vtter the impietie and abomination +of the same, I say, it is the dutie of euerie true messager of God, to +whome the truth is reueled in that behalfe. For the especiall dutie<a NAME="amn15"></a><sup><a href="#mn15">[o]</a></sup> +of Goddes messagers is to preache repentance, to admonishe the offenders +of their offenses, and to say to the wicked, thou shalt die the death, +except thou repent. This, I trust, will no man denie to be the propre office +of all Goddes messagers to preache (as I haue said) repentance and remission +of synnes. But nether of both can be done, except the conscience of the +offenders be accused and conuicted of transgression. For howe shall any +man repent not knowing wher in he hath offended? And where no repentance +is founde<a NAME="amn16"></a><sup><a href="#mn16">[p]</a></sup>, there +can be no entrie to grace. And therfore I say, that of necessitie it is, +that, this monstriferouse empire of women, (which amongest all enormities, +that this day do abound vpon the face of the hole earth, is most detestable +and damnable) be openlie reueled and plainlie declared to the world, to +the end that some may repent and be saued. And thus farre to the first +sorte.</td> + +<td><a NAME="mn7"></a><i><a href="#amn7">[g]</a>: God alway had his people +amongst the wicked, who neuer lacked their prophetes and teachers.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn8"></a><i><a href="#amn8">[h]</a>: Isaie. 13. Ierem. 6. Ezech. +36.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn9"></a><i><a href="#amn9">[i]</a>: Examples what teachers +oght to do in this time.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn10"></a><i><a href="#amn10">[j]</a>: Ezech. 2, Apoca. 6.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn11"></a><i><a href="#amn11">[k]</a>: Thre chef reasons, that +do stay man from speaking the truthe.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn12"></a><i><a href="#amn12">[l]</a>: 1. Cor. 9.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn13"></a><i><a href="#amn13">[m]</a>: Mat. 26. Act. 18, 21.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn14"></a><i><a href="#amn14">[n]</a>: Psalm. 2. Act. 4.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn15"></a><i><a href="#amn15">[o]</a>: It is necessarie for +everie man to open the impietie, whiche he knoweth to hurt his commonwelth.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn16"></a><i><a href="#amn16">[p]</a>: No man can repent except +he knowe his synne.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>To such as thinke that it will be long before such doctrine come to +the eares of the chief offenders, I answer that the veritie of God is of +that nature, that at one time or at other, it will pourchace to it selfe +audience. It is an odour and smell, that can not be suppressed<a NAME="amn17"></a><sup><a href="#mn17">[q]</a></sup>, +yea it is a trumpet that will sound in despite of the aduersarie. It will +compell the verie ennemies to their own confusion, to tes tifie and beare +witnesse of it. For I finde that the prophecie and preaching of Heliseus +was declared in the hall of the king of Syria by the seruantes and flatterers +of the same wicked king<a NAME="amn18"></a><sup><a href="#mn18">[r]</a></sup>, +making mention that Heliseus declared to the king of Israel, what so euer +the said king of Syria spake in his most secret chamber. And the wonderous +workes of Iesus Christ were notified to Herode<a NAME="amn19"></a><sup><a href="#mn19">[s]</a></sup>, +not in any greate praise or commendation of his doctrine, but rather to +signifie that Christ called that tyranne a fox: and that he did no more +regarde his authoritie then did Iohn the Baptist, whom Herode before had +beheaded for the libertie of his tonge. But whether the bearers of the +rumors and tidinges were fauourers of Christ or flatterers of the tyranne, +certain it is that the fame, as well of Christes doctrine, as of his workes +came to the eares of Herod: euen so may the sounde of our weake trumpet, +by the support of some wynd (blowe it from the south or blowe it from the +northe it is no mater) come to the eares of the chief offenders. But whether +it do or not, yet dare we not cease to blowe as God will giue strength<a NAME="amn20"></a><sup><a href="#mn20">[t].</a></sup> +For we are debters to mo then to princes, to witte, to the multitude of +our brethren, of whome, no doubte a greate nomber haue here to fore offended +by errour and ignorance, geuing their suffragies, consent and helpe to +establishe women in their kingdomes and empires<a NAME="amn21"></a><sup><a href="#mn21">[u]</a></sup>, +not vnderstanding howe abominable, odious and detestable is all such vsurped +authoritie in the presence of God. And therfore must the truthe, be plainlie +spoken, that the simple and rude multitude may be admonished.</td> + +<td><a NAME="mn17"></a><i><a href="#amn17">[q]</a>: The propertie of Goddes +truth.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn18"></a><i><a href="#amn18">[r]</a>: 2. Reg. 6.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn19"></a><i><a href="#amn19">[s]</a>: Mat. 14.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn20"></a><i><a href="#amn20">[t]</a>: Rum. 1.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn21"></a><i><a href="#amn21">[u]:</a> The ignorant multitide +hath set up the authoritie of women not knowinge the danger.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td WIDTH="85%"><a NAME="kingobj"></a>And as concerning the danger, which +may hereof insue, I am not altogether so brutishe and insensible, but that +I haue laid mine accompt what the finishinge of the worke may coste me +for mine own parte. First, I am not ignorant howe difficile and dangerous +it is to speake against a common error<a NAME="amn22"></a><sup><a href="#mn22">[v]</a></sup>, +especiallie when that the ambitious mindes of men and women are called +to the obedience of goddes simple commandement. For to the most parte of +'men, laufull and godlie appeareth, what soeuer antiquitie hath receiued. +And secondarilie, I looke to haue mine aduersaries not onlie of the ignorant +multitude, but also of the wise, politike, and quiet spirites of this worlde, +so that aswell shall suche as oght to mainteine the truth and veritie of +God become ennemies to me in this case, as shall the princes and ambitious +persons, who to mainteine their vniust tyrannie do alwayes studie to suppresse +the same. And thus I am most certeinlie persuaded, that my labour shall +not escape reprehension of many. But because I remembre that accomptes<a NAME="amn23"></a><sup><a href="#mn23">[w]</a></sup> +of the talentes receiued must be made to him, who nether respecteth the +multitude, nether yet approueth the wisdome, policie, peace, nor antiquitie, +concluding or determining any thinge against his eternall will reueled +to vs in his moste blessed worde, I am compelled to couer myne eyes, and +shut vp myne eares, that I nether se the multitude, that shall withstand +me in this mater, nether that I shall heare the opprobries, nor consider +the dangers, which I may incurre for vttering the same. I shalbe called +foolishe, curious, despitefull, and a sower of sedition: and one day parchance +(althogh now I be nameles) I may be attainted of treason. But seing that +impossible it is[<a NAME="amn24"></a><sup><a href="#mn24">[x]</a></sup>, +but that ether I shall offend God, dailie calling to my conscience, that +I oght to manifest the veritie knowen, or elles that I shall displease +the worlde for doing the same, I haue determined to obey God, not withstanding +that the world shall rage therat. I knowe that the world offended (by Goddes +permission) may kill the bodie, but Goddes maiestie offended, hath power +to punishe bodie and soule for euer. His maiestie is offended, when that +his preceptes are contemned, and his threatninges estemed to be of none +effect. And amongest his manifold preceptes geuen to his prophetes, and +amongest his threatninges, none is more vehement, then is that, which is +pronounced to Ezechiel in these wordes<a NAME="amn25"></a><sup><a href="mn25">[y]</a></sup>: +Sonne of man, I haue appointed the a watchman to the house of Israel, that +thou shuldest heare from my mouthe the worde, and that thou maist admonishe +them plainlie, when I shall say to the wicked man: O wicked, thou shalt +assuredlie die. Then if thou shalt not speake, that thou maist plainlie +admonishe him, that he may leaue his wicked way, the wicked man shall die +in his iniquitie, but his blood will I requier of thy hand. But and if +thou shalt plainlie admonishe the wicked man, and yet he shall not turne +from his way, such a one shall die in his iniquitie, but thou hast deliuered +thy soule.</td> + +<td><a NAME="mn22"></a><i><a href="#amn22">[v]:</a> <a href="#aansobj">A +very dangerous thing to speake against olde errors.</a></i> +<p><a NAME="mn23"></a><i><a href="#amn23">[w]</a>: Accomptes will be had +of Goddes giftes.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn24"></a><i><a href="#amn24">[x]</a>: The cause mouing the +author to write.</i> +<p><a NAME="mn25"></a><i><a href="#amn25">[y]</a>: Ezech. 33.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>This precept, I say, with the threatning annexed, togither with the +rest, that is spoken in the same chapter, not to Ezechiel onlie, but to +euerie one, whom God placeth whatchman ouer his people and flocke, (and +watchman are they whose eyes he doth open, and whose conscience he pricketh +to admonishe the vngodlie) compelleth me to vtter my conscience in this +mater, notwithstanding that the hole worlde shuld be offended with me for +so doing. Yf any wonder, why I do concele my name, let him be assured, +that the feare of corporall punishement is nether the onlie, nether the +chef cause. My purpose is thrise to blowe the trumpet in the same mater, +if God so permitte<a NAME="amn26"></a><sup><a href="#mn26">[z]</a></sup>: +twise I intende to do it without name, but at the last blast, to take the +blame vpon my selfe, that all others may be purged.</td> + +<td><a NAME="mn26"></a><i><a href="#amn26">[z]</a>: For the Authors name.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> +<hr width="100%"> +<h1> +<a NAME="first blast"></a><a href="#ablast">THE FIRST BLAST TO AWAKE WOMEN +DEGENERATE.</a></h1> +</td> + +<td></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>To promote a woman to beare rule, superioritie, dominion or empire +aboue any realme, nation, or citie, is repugnant to nature, contumelie +to God, a thing most contrarious to his reueled will and approued ordinance, +and finallie it is the subuersion of good order, of all equitie and iustice</td> + +<td></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>In the probation of this proposition, I will not be so curious, as +to gather what soeuer may amplifie, set furth, or decore the same, but +I am purposed, euen as I haue spoken my conscience in most plaine and fewe +wordes, so to stand content with a simple proofe of euerie membre, bringing +in for my witnesse Goddes ordinance in nature, his plaine will reueled +in his worde, and the mindes of such as be moste auncient amongest godlie +writers.</td> + +<td></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>And first, where that I affirme the empire of a woman to be a thing +repugnant to nature, I meane not onlie that God by the order of his creation +hath spoiled woman of authoritie and dominion, but also that man hath seen, +proued and pronounced iust causes why that it so shuld be. Man, I say, +in many other cases blind, doth in this behalfe see verie clearlie. For +the causes be so manifest, that they can not be hid. For who can denie +but it repugneth to nature, that the blind shal be appointed to leade and +conduct such as do see? That the weake, the sicke, and impotent persones<a NAME="an1"></a><sup><a href="#n1">[1]</a></sup>shall +norishe and kepe the hole and strong, and finallie, that the foolishe, +madde and phrenetike shal gouerne the discrete, and giue counsel to such +as be sober of mind? And such be al women, compared vnto man in bearing +of authoritie. For their sight in ciuile regiment, is but blindnes: their +strength, weaknes: their counsel, foolishenes: and iudgement, phrenesie, +if it be rightlie considered.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n1"></a><i><a href="#an1">[1]</a>: Causes why women shuld +not have preeminence ouer men.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>I except such as God by singular priuiledge, and for certein causes +knowen onlie to him selfe, hath exempted from the common ranke of women<a NAME="an2"></a><sup><a href="#n2">[2]</a></sup>, +and do speake of women as nature and experience do this day declare them. +Nature I say, doth paynt them furthe to be weake, fraile, impacient, feble +and foolishe: and experience hath declared them to be vnconstant, variable, +cruell and lacking the spirit of counsel and regiment. And these notable +faultes haue men in all ages espied in that kinde, for the whiche not onlie +they haue remoued women from rule and authoritie, but also some haue thoght +that men subiect to the counsel or empire of their wyues were vn worthie +of all publike office. For this writeth Aristotle in the seconde of his +Politikes<a NAME="an3"></a><sup><a href="#n3">[3]</a></sup>: what difference +shal we put, saith he, whether that women beare authoritie, or the husbanesd +that obey the empire of their wyues be appointed to be magistrates? For +what insueth the one, must nedes folowe the other, to witte, iniustice, +confusion and disorder. The same author further reasoneth, that the policie +or regiment of the Lacedemonians (who other wayes amongest the Grecians +were moste excellent) was not worthie to be reputed nor accompted amongest +the nombre of common welthes, that were well gouerned, because the magistrates, +and rulers of the same were to [o] muche geuen to please and obey their +wyues. What wolde this writer (I pray you) haue said to that realme or +nation, where a woman sitteth crowned in parliament amongest the middest +of men. Oh fearefull and terrible are thy iudgementes<a NAME="an4"></a><sup><a href="#n4">[4]</a></sup> +(o Lord) whiche thus hast abased man for his iniquitie! I am assuredlie +persuaded that if any of those men, which illuminated onelie by the light +of nature, did see and pronounce causes sufficient, why women oght not +to beare rule nor authoritie, shuld this clay liue and see a woman sitting +in iudgement, or riding frome parliament in the middest of men, hauing +the royall crowne vpon her head, the sworde and sceptre borne before her, +in signe that the administration of iustice was in her power: I am assuredlie +persuaded, I say, that suche a sight shulde so astonishe them, that they +shuld iudge the hole worlde to be transformed into Amazones<a NAME="an5"></a><sup><a href="#n5">[5]</a></sup>, +and that suche a metamorphosis and change was made of all the men of that +countrie, as poetes do feyn was made of the companyons of Vlisses, or at +least, that albeit the owtwarde form of men remained, yet shuld they iudge +that their hartes were changed frome the wisdome, vnderstanding, and courage +of men, to the foolishe fondnes and cowardise of women. Yea they further +shuld pronounce, that where women reigne or be in authoritie, that there +must nedes vanitie be preferred to vertue, ambition and pride to temperancie +and modestie, and finallie, that auarice the mother of all mischefe must +nedes deuour equitie and iustice. But lest that we shall seme to be of +this opinion alone<a NAME="an6"></a><sup><a href="#n6">[6]</a></sup>, let +vs heare what others haue seen and decreed in this mater. In the rules +of the lawe thus it is written<a NAME="an7"></a><sup><a href="#n7">[7]</a></sup>: +Women are remoued from all ciuile and publike office<a NAME="an8"></a><sup><a href="#n8">[8]</a></sup>, +so that they nether may be iudges, nether may they occupie the place of +the magistrate, nether yet may they be speakers for others. The same is +repe[a]ted in the third and in the sextenth bokes of the digestes<a NAME="an9"></a><sup><a href="#n9">[9]</a></sup>: +Where certein persones are forbidden, Ne pro aliis postulent, that is, +that they be no speakers nor aduocates for others. And among the rest are +women forbidden, and this cause is added, that they do not against shamefastnes +intermedle them selues with the causes of others<a NAME="an10"></a><sup><a href="#n10">[10]</a></sup>, +nether yet that women presume to vse the offices due to men. The lawe in +the same place doth further declare, that a naturall shamfastnes oght to +be in womankind<a NAME="an11"></a><sup><a href="#n11">[11]</a></sup>, whiche +most certeinlie she loseth, when soeuer she taketh vpon her the office +and estate of man. As in Calphurnia<a NAME="an12"></a><sup><a href="#n12">[12] +</a></sup>was +euidentlie declared, who hauing licence to speake before the senate, at +length became so impudent and importune, that by her babling she troubled +the hole assemblie. And so gaue occasion that this lawe was established.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n2"></a><i><a href="#an2">[2]</a>: Priuate example do not +breake the generall ordinance.</i> +<p><a NAME="n3"></a><i><a href="#an3">[3]</a>: 2 Politicorum Aristotelis.</i> +<p><a NAME="n4"></a><i><a href="#an4">[4]:</a> Reade Isaie the thirde chaptre.</i> +<p><a NAME="n5"></a><i><a href="#an5">[5]</a>: Amazones were monstruouse +women, that coulde not abide the regiment of men, and therfore killed their +husbandes, reade Iustine.</i> +<p><a NAME="n6"></a><i><a href="#an6">[6]</a>: Arist. 2. Politic.</i> +<p><a NAME="n7"></a><i><a href="#an7">[7]</a>: Lib. 50. de regulis iuris.</i> +<p><a NAME="n8"></a><i><a href="#an8">[8]</a>: What women may not be.</i> +<p><a NAME="n9"></a><i><a href="#an9">[9]:</a> 3. 16. lib. Digestorum.</i> +<p><a NAME="n10"></a><i><a href="#an10">[10]</a>: Ad Senatus consul, Veleianum.</i> +<p><a NAME="n11"></a><i><a href="#an11">[11]:</a> Lib. 3. de posulationse +Tit. 1.</i> +<p><a NAME="n12"></a><i><a href="#an12">[12]</a>: Calphurnia.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td WIDTH="85%">In the first boke of the digestes<a NAME="an13"></a><sup><a href="#n13">[13]</a></sup>, +it is pronounced that the condition of the woman in many cases is worse +then of the man. As in iurisdiction (saith the lawe<a NAME="an14"></a><sup><a href="#n14">[14]</a></sup>) +in receiuing of care and tuition, in adoption, in publike accusation, in +delation, in all populat action, and in motherlie power, which she hath +not vpon her owne sonnes. The lawe further will not permit, that the woman +geue any thing to her husband, because it is against the nature of her +kinde, being the inferiour membre to presume to geue any thing to her head<a NAME="an15"></a><sup><a href="#n15">[15]</a></sup>. +The lawe doth more ouer pronounce womankinde to be the most auaricious<a NAME="an16"></a><sup><a href="#n16">[16]</a></sup> +(which is a vice intolerable in those that shulde rule or minister iustice). +And Aristotle<a NAME="an17"></a><sup><a href="#n17">[17]</a></sup>, as +before is touched, doth plainly affirme, that wher soeuer women beare dominion, +there must nedes the people be disorded, liuinge and abounding in all intemperancie, +geuen to pride, excesse, and vanitie. And finallie in the end, that they +must nedes come to confusion and ruine<a NAME="an18"></a><sup><a href="#n18">[18].</a></sup> +<p>Wold to god the examples were not so manifest, to the further declaration +of the imperfections of women<a NAME="an19"></a><sup><a href="#n19">[19]</a></sup>, +of their naturall weaknes, and inordinat appetites. I might adduce histories, +prouing some women to haue died for sodein ioy, some for vnpaciencie to +haue murthered them selues, some to haue burned with such inordinat lust, +that for the quenching of the same, they haue betrayed<a NAME="an20"></a><sup><a href="#n20">[20]</a></sup> +to strangiers their countrie and citie: and some to haue bene so desirous +of dominion, that for the obteining of the same, they haue murthered the +children of their owne sonnes. Yea and some haue killed with crueltie their +owne husbandes<a NAME="an21"></a><sup><a href="#n21">[21]</a></sup> and +children. But to me it is sufficient (because this parte of nature is not +my moste sure foundation) to haue proued<a NAME="an22"></a><sup><a href="#n22">[22]</a></sup>, +that men illuminated onlie by the light of nature, haue seen and haue determined, +that it is a thing moste repugnant to nature, that women rule and gouerne +ouer men. For those that will not permit a woman to haue power ouer her +owne sonnes, will not permit her (I am assured) to haue rule ouer a realme<a NAME="an23"></a><sup><a href="#n23">[23]</a></sup>: +and those that will not suffer her to speake in defense of those that be +accused, nether that will admit her accusation intended against man, will +not approuel her, that she shal sit in iudgement crowned with the royal +crowne, vsurping authoritie in the middest of men. But now to the second +part of nature: In the whiche I include the reueled will and perfect ordinance +of God, and against this parte of nature, I say, that it doth manifestlie +repugne that any woman shal reigne or beare dominion ouer man. For God +first by the order of his creation, and after by the curse and malediction +pronounced against the woman, by the, reason of her rebellion, hath pronounced +the contrarie. First, I say, that woman in her greatest perfection, was +made to serue and obey man<a NAME="an24"></a><sup><a href="#n24">[24]</a></sup>, +not to rule and command him: <a NAME="an25"></a><sup><a href="#n25">[25]</a></sup> +As saint Paule doth reason in these wordes. Man is not of the woman but +the woman of the man. And man was not created for the cause of the woman, +but the woman for the cause of man, and therfore oght the woman to haue +a power vpon her head (that is a couerture in signe of subiection). Of +whiche words it is plaine that the Apostle meaneth, that woman in her greatest +perfection shuld haue knowen, that man was Lord aboue her: and therfore +that she shulde neuer haue pretended any kind of superioritie aboue him, +no more then do the angels aboue God the creator<a NAME="an26"></a><sup><a href="#n26">[26]</a></sup>, +or aboue Christ Iesus their head. So, I say, that in her greatest perfection +woman was created to be subiect to man: But after her fall and rebellion +committed against God, their was put vpon her a newe necessitie, and she +was made subiect to man by the irreuocable sentence of God, pronounced +in these wordes<a NAME="an27"></a><sup><a href="#n27">[27]</a></sup>: I +will greatlie multiplie thy sorowe and thy conception. With sorowe shalt +thou beare thy children, and thy will shall be subiect to thy man: and +he shal beare dominion ouer the. Herebie may such as altogither be not +blinded plainlie see, that God, by his sentence, hath deiected all woman +frome empire and dominion aboue man. For two punishmentes are laid vpon +her, to witte, a dolor, anguishe and payn, as oft as euer she shal be mother; +and a subiection of her selfe, her appetites and will, to her husband, +and to his will. Frome the former parte of this malediction can nether +arte, nobilitie, policie, nor lawe made by man, deliuer womankinde, but +who soeuer atteineth to that honour to be mother, proueth in experience +the effect and strength of goddes word. But (alas) ignorance of God, ambition, +and tyrannie haue studied to abolishe and destroy the second parte of Goddes +punishment. For women are lifted vp to be heades ouer realmes, and to rule +aboue men at their pleasure and appetites. But horrible is the vengeance, +which is prepared for the one and for the other, for the promoters, and +for the persones promoted, except they spedelie repent. For they shall +be deiected from the glorie of the sonnes of God<a NAME="an28"></a><sup><a href="#n28">[28]</a></sup>, +to the sclauerie of the deuill, and to the torment that is prepared for +all suche, as do exalte them selues against God. Against God can nothing +be more manifest, then that a woman shall be exalted to reigne aboue man. +For the contrarie sentence hath he pronounced in these wordes<a NAME="an29"></a><sup><a href="#n29">[29]:</a></sup> +Thy will shall be subiect to thy husband, and he shall beare dominion ouer +the. As God shuld say: forasmuch as thou hast abused thy former condition, +and because thy free will hath broght thy selfe and mankind in to: the +bondage of Satan, I therfore will bring the in bondage to man. For where +before, thy obedience shuld haue bene voluntarie, nowe it shall be by constraint +and by neeessitie: and that because thou hast deceiued thy man, thou shalt +therfore be no longar maistresse ouer thine own appetites, ouer thine owne +will nor desires. For in the there is nether reason nor discretion, whiche +be able to moderate thy affections, and therfore they shall, be subiect +to the desire of thy man. He shall be Lord and gouernour, not onlie ouer +thy bodie, but euen ouer thy appetites and will. This sentence, I say, +did God pronounce against Heua, and her daughters, as the rest of the Scriptures +doth euidentlie witnesse. So that no woman can euer presume to reigne aboue +man, but the same she must nedes do in despite, of God, and in contempt +of. his punishment, and maledictjon<a NAME="an30"></a><sup><a href="#n30">[30]</a></sup>.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n13"></a><i><a href="#an13">[13]</a>: De statu homino Titul. +8. Frome women.</i> +<p><a NAME="n14"></a><i><a href="#an14">[14]</a>: power is taken away by +the Ciuile lawe ouer their own children.</i> +<p><a NAME="n15"></a><i><a href="#an15">[15]</a>: Dig. lib. 24. de donatione +inter virum et foeminane.</i> +<p><a NAME="n16"></a><i><a href="#an16">[16]</a>: women be couetous therefore +vnmete gouernors.</i> +<p><a NAME="n17"></a><i><a href="#an17">[17]</a>: Lib. 1. Digest. de le +gib. et senatuscon Titul. 3, Politic. 2.</i> +<p><a NAME="n18"></a><i><a href="#an18">[18]</a>: England and Scotland +beware.</i> +<p><a NAME="n19"></a><i><a href="#an19">[19]:</a> Great imperfections of +women.</i> +<p><a NAME="n20"></a><i><a href="#an20">[20]</a>: Ronsilda the wife of +Gisulphus betrayed to Cacanus the dukedome of friaul in Italie.</i> +<p><a NAME="n21"></a><i><a href="#an21">[21]</a>: Iane quene of Naples +hanged her husband.</i> +<p><a NAME="n21"></a><i><a href="#an22">[22]</a>: Athalia, 4. Reg. II. +Hurene, Anton. Sabell.</i> +<p><a NAME="n23"></a><i><a href="#an23">[23]</a>: If the lesse thinges +be denied to women, the greater cannot be granted.</i> +<p><a NAME="n24"></a><i><a href="#an24">[24]</a>: woman in her greatest +perfection was made to serue man.</i> +<p><a NAME="n25"></a><i><a href="#an25">[25]</a>: I. Cor. II.</i> +<p><a NAME="n26"></a><i><a href="#an26">[26]</a>: A good comparison.</i> +<p><a NAME="n27"></a><i><a href="#an27">[27]</a>: A newe necessity of womans +subiection. woman by the sentence of God, subiect to man. Gene. 3.</i> +<p><a NAME="n28"></a><i><a href="#an28">[28]</a>: The punishment of women +unjustlie promoted and of their promoters.</i> +<p><a NAME="n29"></a><i><a href="#an29">[29]</a>: Gene. 3.</i> +<p><a NAME="n30"></a><i><a href="#an30">[30]</a>: Let all women take hede.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td><a NAME="degenobj"></a>I am not ignorant, that the most part of men +do vnderstand this malediction of the subiection of the wife to her husband, +and of the dominion, which; he beareth aboue her<a NAME="an31"></a><sup><a href="#n31">[31]</a></sup>: +but the holie ghost geueth to vs an other interpretation of this place, +taking from all women all. kinde of superioritie, authoritie and power +ouer man, speaking as foloweth, by the mouth of saint Paule<a NAME="an32"></a><sup><a href="#n32">[32].</a></sup> +I suffer not a woman to teache, nether yet to vsurpe authoritie aboue man. +Here he nameth women in generall, excepting none, affirming that she may +vsurpe authoritie aboue no man. And that he speaketh more plainly, in an +other place in these wordes<a NAME="an33"></a><sup><a href="#n33">[33]</a></sup>: +Let women kepe silence in the congregation, for it is not permitted to +them to speake, but to be subiect as the lawe sayeth. These two testimonies +of the holy ghost, be sufficient to proue what soeuer we haue affirmed +before, and to represse the inordinate pride of women, as also to correct +the foolishnes of those that haue studied to exalt women in authoritie +aboue man, against God, and against his sentence pronounced. But that the +same two places of the apostle may the better he vnderstand: it is to be +noted, that in the latter, which is writen in the first epistle to the +Corinthes the 14. chapitre, before the apostle had permitted that all persones +shuld prophecie one after an other: addinge this reason: 'that all may +learne and all may receiue consolation'. And lest that any might haue iudged, +that amongest a rude multitude, and the pluralitie of speakers, manie, +thinges litle to purpose might haue bene affirmed, or elles that some confusion +might haue risen: he addeth, the spirites of the prophetes are subiect +to the prophetes: As he shuld say, God shall alwayes raise vp some, to +whome the veritie shalbe reueled, and vnto such ye shal geue place, albeit +they sit in the lowest seates. And thus the apostle wold haue prophecying +an exercise to be free to the hole churche, that euerie one shuld communicate +with the congregation, what God had reueled to them, prouidinge that it +were orderlie done. But frome this generall priuiledge he secludeth all +woman, sayinge: let women kepe silence in the congregation. And why I pray +you? was it because that the apostle thoght no woman to haue any knowledge? +no he geueth an other reason, saying; let her be subiect as the lawe saith<a NAME="an34"></a><sup><a href="#n34">[34]</a></sup>. +In which wordes is first to be noted, that the apostle calleth this former +sentence pronounced against woman a lawe, that is, the immutable decree +of God, who by his owne voice hath subiected her to one membre of the congregation<a NAME="an35"></a><sup><a href="#n35">[35]</a></sup>, +that is to her husband, wherupon the holie ghost concludeth, that she may +neuer rule nor bear empire ahoue man. For she that is made subiect to one, +may neuer be preferred to many, and that the holie ghoste doth manifestlie +expresse, saying: I suffer not that women vsurpe authoritie aboue man: +he sayth not, I will not, that woman vsurpe authoritie aboue her husband, +but he'nameth man in generall, taking frome her all power and authoritie, +to speake, to reason, to interprete, or to teache, but principallie to +rule or to iudge in the assemblie of men. So that woman by the lawe of +God, and by the interpretation of the holy ghost, is vtterly forbidden +to occupie the place of God in the offices afore said, which he hath assigned +to man, whome he hath appointed and ordeined his lieutenant in earth: secluding +frome that honor and dignitie all woman, as this short argument shall euidentlie +declare.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n31"></a><i><a href="#an31">[31]:</a> Answer to an obiection.</i> +<p><a NAME="n32"></a><i><a href="#an32">[32]</a>: 1 Tim. 2.</i> +<p><a NAME="n33"></a><i><a href="#an33">[33]</a>: I. Cor. 14.</i> +<p><a NAME="n34"></a><i><a href="#an34">[34]:</a> From a general privilege +is woman secluded.</i> +<p><a NAME="n35"></a><i><a href="#an35">[35]</a>: She that is, subject +to one may not rule many.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>The apostle taketh power frome all woman to speake in the assemblie<a NAME="an36"></a><sup><a href="#n36">[36]</a></sup>. +Ergo he permitteth no woman to rule aboue man. The former parteis euident, +whereupon doth the conclusion of necessitie folowe. For he that taketh +from woman the least parte of authoritie<a NAME="an37"></a><sup><a href="#n37">[37]</a></sup>, +dominion or rule, will not permit vnto her that whiche is greatest: But +greater it is to reigne aboue realmes and nations, to publish and to make +lawes, and to commande men of all estates, and finallie to appoint iudges +and ministers, then to speake in the congregation. For her iudgement, sentence, +or opinion proposed in the congregation, may be iudged by all, may be corrected +by the learned, and reformed by the godlie. But woman being promoted in +souereine authoritie, her lawes must be obeyed, her opinion folowed, and +her tyrannic mainteined: supposing that it be expreslie against God, and +the prophet [profit] of the common welth, as to[o] manifest experience +doth this day witnesse. And therfore yet againe I repete that, whiche before +I haue affirmed: to witt, that a woman promoted to sit in the seate of +God, that is, to teache, to iudge or to reigne aboue man, is amonstre in +nature, contumelie to God, and a thing most repugnant to his will and ordinance. +For he hath depriued them as before is proued, of speakinge in the congregation, +and hath expreslie forbidden them to vsurpe any kinde of authoritie aboue +man. Howe then will he suffer them to reigne and haue empire aboue realmes +and nations? He will neuer, I say, approue it, because it is a thing most +repugnant to his perfect ordinance, as after shalbe declared, and as the +former scriptures haue plainlie geuen testimonie. To the whiche, to adde +any thing were superfluous, were it not that the worlde is almost nowe +comen to that blindnes, that what soeuer pleaseth not the princes and the +multitude, the same is reiected as doctrine newelie forged, and is condemned, +for heresie. I haue therfore thoght good to recite the mindes of some auncient +writers in the same mater, to the end that suche as altogither be not blinded +by the deuil, may consider and vnderstand this my iudgement to be no newe +interpretation of Goddes scriptures, but to be the vniforme consent of +the most parte of godlie writers, since the time of the apostles. Tertullian<a NAME="an38"></a><sup><a href="#n38">[38]</a></sup> +in his boke of womens apparell, after that he hath shewed many causes why +gorgious apparell is abominable and odiouse in a woman, addeth these wordes, +speaking as it were to euery woman by name: Dost thou not knowe (saith +he) that thou art Heua? the sentence of God liueth and is effectuall against +this kind, and in this worlde of necessity it is, that the punishment also +liue. Thou art the porte and gate of the deuil. Thou art the first transgressor +of goddes law. thou diddest persuade and easely deceiue him whome the deuil +durst not assault<a NAME="an39"></a><sup><a href="#n39">[39]</a></sup>. +For thy merit (that is for thy death) it behoued the son of god to suffre +the death, and doth it yet abide in thy mind to decke the aboue thy skin +coates? By these and many other graue sentences, and quicke interrogations, +did this godlie writer labour to bring euerie woman in contemplation of +her selfe, to the end that euerie one depelie weying, what sentence God +had pronounced against the hole race and doughters of Heua, might not onely +learne daily to humble and subiect them selues in the presence of God, +but also that they shulde auoide and abhorre what soeuer thing might exalte +them or puffe them vp in pride, or that might be occasion, that they shuld +forget the curse and malediction of God. And what, I pray you, is more +able to cause woman to forget her owne condition, then if she be lifted +vp in authoritie aboue man? It is a thingverie difficile to a man, (be +he neuer so constant) promoted to honors, not to be tickled some what with +pride (for the winde of vaine glorie doth easelie carie vp the drie dust +of the earth). But as for woman<a NAME="an40"></a><sup><a href="#n40">[40]</a></sup>, +it is no more possible, that she being set aloft in authoritie aboue man, +shall resist the motions of pride, then it is able to the weake reed, or +to the turning wethercocke, not to bowe or turne at the vehemencie of the +vnconstant wind. And therfore the same writer expreslie forbiddeth all +woman to intremedle with the office of man. For thus he writeth in his +book de virginibus velandis<a NAME="an41"></a><sup><a href="#n41">[41]</a></sup>: +It is not permitted to a woman, to speake in the congregation, nether to +teache, nether to baptise, nether to vendicate to her selfe any office +of man. The same he speaketh yet more plainly in the preface of his sixte +boke writen against Marcion<a NAME="an42"></a><sup><a href="#n42">[42]</a></sup>, +where he recounting certain monstruous thinges, whiche were to be sene +at the sea called Euxinum, amongest the rest, he reciteth this as a greate +monstre in nature, that women in those partes, were not tamed nor embased +by consideration of their own sex and kind: but that all shame laide a +parte, they made expenses vpon weapons and learned the feates of warre, +hauinge more pleasure to fight, then to mary and be subiect to man. Thus +farre of Tertullian, whose wordes be so plain, that they nede no explanation. +For he that taketh from her all office apperteining to man, will not suffre +her to reigne aboue man: and he that iudgeth it a monstre in nature, that +a woman shall exercise weapons, must iudge it to be a monstre of monstres, +that a woman shalbe exalted aboue a hole realme and nation. Of the same +minde is Origen, and diuers others. Yea euen till the dayes of Augustine, +whose sentences I omit to auoide prolixitie.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n36"></a><i><a href="#an36">[36]</a>: A strong argument.</i> +<p><a NAME="n37"></a><i><a href="#an37">[37]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n38"></a><i><a href="#an38">[38]</a>: Tertullian de habitu +mulierum.</i> +<p><a NAME="n39"></a><i><a href="#an39">[39]</a>: Let women hearken what +Tertullian an olde Docto saith.</i> +<p><a NAME="n40"></a><i><a href="#an40">[40]:</a> NOTE</i> +<p><a NAME="n41"></a><i><a href="#an41">[41]</a>: Tertull, lib 8. de virginilis +verlandis.</i> +<p><a NAME="n42"></a><i><a href="#an42">[42]</a>: In proæmio 6. lib. +contra Marcionem.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>Augustine in his 22. boke writen against Faustus<a NAME="an43"></a><sup><a href="#n43">[43]</a></sup>, +proueth that a woman oght to serue her husband as vnto God: affirming that +in no thing hath woman equall power with man, sauing that nether of both +haue power ouer their owne bodies. By whiche he wold plainlie conclude, +that a woman oght neuer to pretend nor thirst for that power and authoritie +which is due to man. For so he doth explane him selfe in an other place<a NAME="an44"></a><sup><a href="#n44">[44]</a></sup>, +affirming that woman oght to be repressed and brideled be times, if she +aspire to any dominion: alledging that dangerous and perillous it is to +suffre her to procede, althogh it be in temporall and corporall thinges. +And therto he addeth these wordes: God seeth not for a time, nether is +there any newe thinge in his sight and knowledge, meaninge therby, that +what God hath sene in one woman (as concerning dominion and bearing of +authoritie) the same he seeth in all. And what he hath forbidden to one, +the same he also forbiddeth to all. And this most euidentlie yet in an +other place he writeth, mouing this question: howe can woman be the image +of God, seing (saith he<a NAME="an45"></a><sup><a href="#n45">[45]</a></sup>) +she is subiect to man, and hath none authoritie, nether to teache, nether +to be witnesse, nether to iudge, muche lesse to rule, or beare empire? +These be the verie wordes of Augustine, of which it is euident that this +godlie writer<a NAME="an46"></a><sup><a href="#n46">[46]</a></sup>, doth +not onelie agree withe Tertullian before recited, but also with the former +sentence of the lawe, whiche taketh frome woman not onelie all authoritie +amongest men, but also euerie office apperteining to man. To the question +howe she can be the image of God, he answereth as foloweth. Woman (saith +he) compared to other creatures is the image of God, for she beareth dominion +ouer them: but compared vnto man, she may not be called the image of God, +for she beareth not rule and lordship ouer man, but oght to obey him &c. +And howe that woman oght to obey man, he speaketh yet more clearlie in +these words: the woman shalbe subiect to man as vnto Christ. For woman +(saith he<a NAME="an47"></a><sup><a href="#n47">[47]</a></sup>) hath not +her example frome the bodie and from the fleshe, that so she shalbe subiect +to man, as the fleshe is vnto the spirite. Because that the flesh in the +weaknes and mortalitie of this life, lusteth and striueth against the spirit, +and therfore wold not the holie ghost geue example of subiection to the +woman of any suche thing &c. This sentence of Augustine oght to be +noted of all women, for in it he plainlie affirmeth, that woman oght to +be subiect to man, that she neuer oght, more to desire preeminence aboue +him, then that she oght to desire aboue Christe Iesus. With Augustine agreeth +in euerie point S. Ambrose, who thus writeth in his Hexaemeron<a NAME="an48"></a><sup><a href="#n48">[48]</a></sup>: +Adam was deceiued by Heua, and not Heua by Adam, and therfore iust it is, +that woman receiue and acknowledge him for gouernor whom she called to +sinne, lest that again she slide and fall by womanlie facilitie. And writing +vpon the epistle to the Ephesians<a NAME="an49"></a><sup><a href="#n49">[49]</a></sup>, +he saith: let women be subiect to their owne husbandes as vnto the Lorde: +for the man is heade to the woman, and Christ is heade to the congregation, +and he is the sauiour of the bodie: but the congregation is subiect to +Christ, euen so oght women to be to their husbandes in all thing-es. He +procedeth further saying: women are commanded to be subiect to men by the +lawe of nature, because that man is the author or beginner of the woman: +for as Christ is the head of the churche, so is man of the woman. From +Christ, the church toke beginning, and therfore it is subiect vnto him: +euen so did woman take beginning from man, that she shuld be subiect. Thus +we heare the agreing of these two writers to be such, that a man might +iudge the one to haue stolen the wordes and sentences from the other. And +yet plain it is, that duringe the time of their writinge, the one was farre +distant frome the other. But the holie ghost, who is the spirite of Concorde +and vnitie, did so illuminate their hartes, and directe their tonges, and +pennes, that as they did conceiue and vnderstand one truth, so did they +pronounce and vtter the same, leauing a testimonie of their knowledge and +Concorde to vs their posteritia. If any thinke that all these former sentences, +be spoken onelie of the subiection of the maryed woman to her husband, +as before I haue proued the contrarie, by the plain wordes and reasoning +of S. Paule, so shal I shortlie do the same, by other testimonies of the +forsaid writers. The same Ambrose writing vpon the second chapitre of the +first epistle to Timothie<a NAME="an50"></a><sup><a href="#n50">[50]</a></sup>, +after he hath spoken much of the simple arrayment of women: he addeth these +wordes: woman oght not onelie to haue simple arrayment, but all authoritie +is to be denied vnto her: for she must be in subiection to man (of whome +she hath taken her originall) aswell in habit as in seruice. And after +a fewe wordes he saith: because that death did entre in to the world by +her, there is no boldenes that oght to be permitted vnto her, but she oght +to be in humilitie. Hereof it is plain, that frome all woman, be she maried +or vnmaried, is all authoritie taken to execute any office, that apperteineth +to man. Yea plain it is that all woman is commanded, to serue, to be in +humilitie and subiection. Whiche thing yet speaketh the same writer, more +plainlie in these wordes<a NAME="an51"></a><sup><a href="#n51">[51]</a></sup>. +It is not permitted to women to speake, but to be in silence, as the lawe +saith<a NAME="an52"></a><sup><a href="#n52">[52]</a></sup>. What saith +the lawe? Vnto 'thy husband, shall thy conuersion be, and he shall beare +dominion ouer the'. This is a speciall lawe (saith Ambrose) whose sentence, +lest it shulde be violated, infirmed, or made weake, women are commanded +to be in silence. Here he includeth all women. And yet he procedeth further +in the same place saying<a NAME="an53"></a><sup><a href="#n53">[53]</a></sup>: +It is shame for them to presume to speake of the lawe in the house of the +Lord, who hath commanded them to be subiect to their men. But moste plainly +speaketh he writing vpon the 16. chapitre of the epistle of S. Paule to +the Romaines, vpon these wordes<a NAME="an54a"></a><sup><a href="#n54">[54a]:</a></sup> +Salute Rufus and his mother. For this cause (saith Ambrose) did the apostle +place Rufus before his mother, for the election of the administration of +the grace of God, in the whiche a woman hath no place. For he was chosen +and promoted by the Lorde, to take care ouer his busines, that is, ouer +the churche, to the whiche office could not his mother be appointed, albeit +she was a woman so, holie, that the apostle called her his mother. Hereof +it is plaine that the administration of the grace of God, is denied to +all woman. By the administration of Goddes grace, is vnderstand not onely +the preaching of the worde and administration of the sacramentes, by the +whiche the grace of God is presented and ordinarilie distributed vnto man, +but also the administration of ciuile iustice, by the whiche, vertue oght +to be mainteined, and vices punished. The execution wherof is no lesse +denied to woman, then is the preaching of the Euangile, or administration +of the sacramentes, as herafter shall most plainlie appeare.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n43"></a><i><a href="#an43">[43]:</a> August. lib. 22. contra +Faustum, c.31.</i> +<p><a NAME="n44"></a><i><a href="#an44">[44]:</a> De Trinitat, lib. 12 +cap. 7</i> +<p><a NAME="n45"></a><i><a href="#an45">[45]</a>: In quaect. veteris Testamenti, +quaest. 45.</i> +<p><a NAME="n46"></a><i><a href="#an46">[46]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n47"></a><i><a href="#an47">[47]</a>: Lib. de Continentia cap. +4.</i> +<p><a NAME="n48"></a><i><a href="#an48">[48]</a>: Ambros. in Hexaemero +lib. 5. c. 7.</i> +<p><a NAME="n49"></a><i><a href="#an49">[49]</a>: Cap. 5.</i> +<p><a NAME="n50"></a><i><a href="#an50">[50]</a>: Ambros. super. 2. c. +I epist. ad Timoth.</i> +<p><a NAME="n51"></a><i><a href="#an51">[51]</a>: Ambros. in I. epist. +ad Corin. cap. 14.</i> +<p><a NAME="n52"></a><i><a href="#an52">[52]</a>: Genes 3.</i> +<p><a NAME="n53"></a><i><a href="#an43">[53]</a>: whose house I pray you +ought the parliament house to be, Goddes or the deuilles? </i> +<p><a NAME="n54a"></a><i><a href="#an54a">[54a]</a>: Rufus is by S. Paul +saluted before his mother.</i> +<br> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>Chrysostome amongest the Grecian writers of no small credit, speaking +in rebuke of men, who in his dayes, were becdmen inferior to some women +in witt and in godlines, saith<a NAME="an54"></a><sup><a href="#n54">[54]</a></sup>: +for this cause was woman put vnder thy power (he speaketh to man in generall) +and thou wast pronounced Lorde ouer her, that she shulde obey the, and +that the head shuld not folowe the feet. But often it is, that we see the +contrary, that he who in his ordre oght to be the head, doth not kepe the +ordre of the feet (that is, doth not rule the feet) and that she, that +is in place of the foote, is constitute to be the head. He speaketh these +wordes as it were in admiration<a NAME="an55"></a><sup><a href="#n55">[55]</a></sup>, +that man was becomen so brutish, that he did not consider it to be a thing +most monstruouse, that woman shulde be preferred to man in any thing, whom +God had subiected to man in all thinges. He procedeth saying: Neuer the +lesse it is the parte of the man, with diligent care to repel the woman, +that geueth him wicked counsel: and woman, whiche gaue that pestilent counsel +to man, oght at all times to haue the punishment, whiche was geuen to Heua, +sounding in her eares. And in an other place he induceth God speaking to +the woman in this sorte<a NAME="an56"></a><sup><a href="#n56">[56]</a></sup>: +Because thou left him, of whose nature thou wast participant, and for whome +thou wast formed, and hast had pleasure to haue familiaritie with that +wicked beast, and wold take his counsel: therfore I subiect the to man, +and I apointe and affirme him to be thy Lorde, that thou maist acknowledge +his dominion, and because thou couldest not beare rule learne well to be +ruled. Why they shulde not beare rule, he declareth, in other places, saying<a NAME="an57"></a><sup><a href="#n57">[57]:</a></sup> +womankinde is imprudent and soft, (or flexible) imprudent because she can +not consider withe wisdome and reason the thinges which she heareth and +seeth: and softe she is, because she is easelie bowed. I knowe that Chrysostome +bringeth in these wordes<a NAME="an58"></a><sup><a href="#n58">[58]</a></sup> +to declare the cause why false prophetes do commonlie deceiue women: because +they are easelie persuaded to any opinion, especiallie if it be against +God, and because they lacke prudence and right reason to iudge the thinges +that be, spoken. But hereof may their nature be espied, and the vices of +the same, whiche in no wise oght to be in, those, that are apointed to +gouerne others: For they oght to be constant, stable, prudent and doing +euerie thing with discretion and reason, whiche vertues women can not haue +in equalitie with men. For that he doth witnesse in an other place, saying: +women haue in them selues a tickling and studhe of vaine glorie, and that +they may haue common with men: they are sodeinlie moued to anger, and that +they haue also common with some men. But vertues. in which they excell<a NAME="an59"></a><sup><a href="#n59">[59]</a></sup>, +they haue not common with man, and therfore hath the apostle remoued them +from the office of teachinge, which is an euident proof that in vertue +they farre differ frome man. Let the reasons of this writer be marked, +for further he yet procedeth: after that he hath in many wordes lamented +the effeminate maners of men, who were so farre degenerate to the weaknes +of women, that some might haue demanded: why may not women teache amongest +suche a sorte of men, who in wisdome and godlines are becomen inferior +vnto women? We finallie concludeth: that not withstanding that men be degenerate, +yet may not women vsurpe any authoritie aboue them, and in the end, he +addeth these wordes: These thinges do not I speake to extolle them (that +is women) but to the confusion and shame of our selues, and to admonish +vs to take again the dominion, that is mete and conuenient for vs, not +onelie that power which is according to the excellencie of dignitie: but +that which is accordinge to prouidence, and according to helpe, and vertue. +For then is the bodie in best proportion<a NAME="an60"></a><sup><a href="#n60">[60]</a></sup>, +when it hath the best gouernor. O that both man and woman shulde consider +the profound counsel and admonition of this father! He wolde not that man +for appetit of any vaine glorie shuld desire preeminence aboue woman. For +God hath not made man to be heade for any suche cause: but hauing respecte +to that weaknes and imperfection which alwayes letteth woman to gouerne. +He hath ordeined man to be superior, and that meaneth Chrysostome, saying: +then is the bodie in best proportion, when it hath the best gouernor. But +woman can neuer be the best gouernor, by reason that she-being spoiled +of the spirit of regiment, can neuer attein to that degree, to be called +or iudged a good gouernor. Because in the nature of all woman, lurketh +suche vices, as in good gouernors are not tolerable. Which the same writes +expresseth. in these wordes<a NAME="an61"></a><sup><a href="#n61">[61]</a></sup>: +womankind (saith he) is rashe and foolhardie, and their couetousnes is +like the goulf of hell, that is, insaciable. And therfore in an other place<a NAME="an62"></a><sup><a href="#n62">[62]</a></sup>, +he will that woman shall haue no thing to do in iudgement, in common affaires, +or in the regiment of the common welth, because she is impacient of troubles, +but that she shall liue in tranquillitie; and quietnes. And if she haue +occasion to go frome the house, that yet she shal haue no matter of trouble, +nether to, folowe her, nether to be offered vnto her, as commonlie there +must be to such as beare authoritie: And with Chrysostome fullie agreeth +Basilius Magnus in a sermon<a NAME="an63"></a><sup><a href="#n63">[63]</a></sup> +which he maketh vpon some places of scripture, wherin he reproueth diuers +vices and amongest the rest, he affirmeth woman to be a tendre creature, +flexible, soft and pitifull: whiche nature, God hath geuen vnto her, that +she may be apt to norishe children. The which facilitie of the woman, did +Satan abuse, and therby broght her frome the obedience of God. And therfore +in diuers other places doth he conclude, that she is not apt to beare rule, +and that she is forbidden to teache. Innumerable mo testimonies, of all +sortes of writers may be adduced for the same purpose, but withe these +I stand content: iudgeing it sufficient to stoppe the mouthe of such as +accuse and condemne all doctrine, as hereticall, which displeaseth them +in any point that I haue proued, by the determinations and lawes of men +illuminated onelie by the light of nature, by the ordre of Goddes creation, +by the curse and malediction pronounced against woman, by the mouth of +saint Paule, who is the interpreter of Goddes sentence, and lawe, and finallie +by the mindes of those writers, who in the church of God, haue bene alwayes +holden in greatest reuerence: that it is a thing moste repugnant to nature, +to Goddes will and apointed ordinance, (yea that it can not be without +contumelie committed against God) that a woman shuld be promoted to dominion +or empire to reigne ouer man, be it in realme, nation, prouince or citie. +Now resteth it in few wordes, to be shewed, that the same empire of women +is the subuersion of good ordre equitie and iustice.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n54"></a><i><a href="#an54">[54]</a>: Chrysost. homil. 17. +in genes.</i> +<p><a NAME="n55"></a><i><a href="#an55">[55]</a>: NOTE</i> +<p><a NAME="n56"></a><i><a href="#an56">[56]</a>: Homil. 15 in Genes.</i> +<p><a NAME="n57"></a><i><a href="#an57">[57]</a>: God graunt all womens +hartes to understand and folow this sentence.</i> +<p><a NAME="n58"></a><i><a href="#an58">[58]</a>: In Mat. cap. 23. homil. +44.</i> +<p><a NAME="n59"></a><i><a href="#an59">[59]</a>: woman can no haue vertue +in equalitie with man. Ad Ephe. cap. 4. sermone 13. NOTE</i> +<p><a NAME="n60"></a><i><a href="#an60">[60]</a>: The body lackinge the +head, can not be well gouerened nether can common welth lackinge man.</i> +<p><a NAME="n61"></a><i><a href="#an61">[61]</a>: In ca. 22. Ioh. homil. +87.</i> +<p><a NAME="n62"></a><i><a href="#an62">[62]</a>: In Ioh. homil. 41.</i> +<p><a NAME="n63"></a><i><a href="#an63">[63]</a>: Basilius Mag. in aliquot +scripturae locos.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>Augustine defineth<a NAME="an64"></a><sup><a href="#n64">[64]</a></sup> +ordre to be that thing, by the whiche God hath appointed and ordeined all +thinges. Note well reader, that Augustine will admit no ordre, where Goddes +apointment is absent and lacketh.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n64"></a><i><a href="#an64">[64]</a>: De ordine lib. I C. +10</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>And in an other place he saith<a NAME="an65"></a><sup><a href="#n65">[65]</a></sup>, +that ordre is a disposition, geuing their owne propre places to thinges +that be vnequall, which he termeth in Latin <i>Parium</i> et <i>disparium</i>, +that is, of thinges equall or like, and thinges vnequall or vnlike. Of +whiche two places and of the hole disputation, which is conteined in his +second boke de <i>ordine</i>, it is euident<sup><a href="#an66">[66]</a></sup>, +that what soeuer is done ether whithout the assurance of Goddes will, or +elles against his will manifestlie reueled in his word, is done against +ordre. But suche is the empire and regiment of all woman (as euidentlie +before is declared) and therfore, I say; it is a thing plainlie repugnant +to good ordre, yea it is the subuersion of the same. If any list to reiect +the definition of Augustin, as ether not propre to this purpose, or elles +as insufficient to proue mine intent: let the same man vnderstand, that +in so doinge, he hath infirmed mine argument nothinge. For as I depend +not vpon the determinations of men, so think I my cause no weaker, albeit +their authoritie be denied vnto me. Prouided that god by his will reueled, +and manifest worde, stand plain and euident on my side. That God hath subiected +womankinde to man by the ordre of his creation, and by the curse that he +hath pronounced against her is before declared. Besides these, he hath +set before our eyes, two other mirrors<a NAME="an67"></a><sup><a href="#n67">[67]</a></sup> +and glasses, in whiche he will, that we shulde behold the ordre, which +he hath apointed and established in nature: the one is, the naturall bodie +of man: the other is the politik or ciuile body of that common welth, in +which God by his own word hath apointed an ordre. In the natural body of +man God hath apointed an ordre, that the head shail occupie the vppermost +place. And the head hath he ioyned with the bodie, that frome it, doth +life and motion flowe to the rest of the membres. In it hath he placed +the eye to see, the eare to hear, and the tonge to speake, which offices +are apointed to none other membre of the bodie. The rest of the membres, +haue euery one their own place and office apointed: but none may haue nether +the place nor office of the heade. For who wolde not iudge that bodie to +be a monstre, where there was no head eminent aboue the rest, but that +the eyes were in the handes, the tonge and mouth beneth in the belie, and +the eares in the feet. Men, I say, shulde not onlie pronounce this bodie +to be a monstre: but assuredlie they might conclude that such a bodie coulde +not long indure. And no lesse monstruous is the bodie of that common welth<a NAME="an68"></a><sup><a href="#n68">[68]</a></sup>, +where a woman beareth empire. For ether doth it lack a laufull heade (as +in very dede it doth) or els there is an idol<a NAME="an69"></a><sup><a href="#n69">[69]</a></sup> +exalted in the place of the true head. An idol I call that, which hath +the forme and apparance, but lacketh the vertue and strength, which the +name and proportion do resemble and promise. As images haue face, nose, +eyes, mouth, handes and feet painted, but the vse of the same, can not +the craft and art of man geue them: as the holy ghost by the mouth of Dauid +teacheth vs, saying<a NAME="an70"></a><sup><a href="#n70">[70]</a></sup>: +they haue eyes, but they see not, mouth, but they speake not, nose, but +they smell not, handes and feet, but they nether touche nor haue power +to go. And suche, I say, is euerie realme and nation, where a woman beareth +dominion. For in despite of God (he of his iust iudgement, so geuing them +ouer in to a reprobat minde) may a realme, I confesse, exalt vp a woman +to that monstriferous honor, to be estemed as head<a NAME="an71"></a><sup><a href="#n71">[71]</a></sup>. +But impossible it is to man and angel, to geue vnto her the properties +and perfect offices of a laufull heade. For the same God that hath denied +power to the hand to speake, to the bely to heare, and to the feet to see, +hath denied to woman power to commande man, and hath taken away wisdome +to consider, and prouidence to forsee the thinges, that, be profitable +to the common welth: yea finallie he hath denied to her in any case to +be head to man: but plainly hath pronounced that man is head to woman, +euen as Christ is heade to all man<a NAME="an72"></a><sup><a href="#n72">[72]</a></sup>. +If men in a blinde rage shulde assemble to gether, and apointe them selues +an other heade then Iesus Christ (as the papistes haue done their romishe +Antichrist) shuld Christ therfore lose his owne dignitie, or shulde God +geue that counterfet head power to geue life to the bodie, to see what +soeuer might endamage or hurte it, to speake in defense, and to heare the +request of euerie subiect? It is certein that he wold not. For that honor +he hath apointed before all times to his onelie sonne: and the same will +he geue to no creature besides: no more will he admit, nor accept woman +to be the lauful head ouer man<a NAME="an73"></a><sup><a href="#n73">[73]</a></sup>, +althogh man, deuil, and angel will coniure in their fauor. For seing he +hath subiected her to one (as before is saide) he will neuer permit her +to reigne ouer manie. Seing he hath commanded her to heare, and obey one, +he will not suffre that she speake, and with vsurped authoritie command +realmes and nations. Chrysostome explaning these wordes of the apostle<a NAME="an74"></a><sup><a href="#n74">[74]</a></sup>: +(the heade of woman is man) compareth God in his vniuersall regiment to +a king sitting in his royall maiestie<a NAME="an75"></a><sup><a href="#n75">[75]</a></sup>, +to whome all his subiectes commanded to geue homage and obedience, appeare +before him, bearing euerie one suche a badge and cognisance of dignitie +and honor, as he hath geuen to them: which if they despise and contemne, +then do they dishonor their king, Euen so saith he oght man and woman to +appeare before God, bearing the ensignes of the condition, whiche they +haue receiued of him. Man hath receiued a certein glorie and dignitie aboue +the, woman, and therfore oght he to appeare before his high maiestie, bearing +the signe of his honor, hauinge no couerture vpon his heade: to witnesse +that in earth man hath no head, (beware Chrysostome what thou saist, thou +shalt be reputed a traytor if Englishe men heare the<a NAME="an76"></a><sup><a href="#n76">[76]</a></sup>: +for they must haue my souereine lady and maistresse, and Scotland hath +dronken also the enchantment and venom of Circes, let it be so to their +owne shame and confusion, he procedeth in these wordes) but woman oght +to +be couered, to witnesse, that in earth she hath a head, that is man. Trewe +it is (Chrysostome) woman is couered in both the said realmes<a NAME="an77"></a><sup><a href="#n77">[77],</a></sup> +but it is not with the signe of subiection, but it is with the signe of +superioritie, to witt, with the royal crowne. To that he answereth in these +wordes: what if man neglect his honor? he his no lesse to be mocked (saith +Chrysostome) then if a king shulde depose himself of his diademe or crowne +and royal estat, and cloth him self in the habit of a sclaue. What, I pray +you, shulde this godlie father haue saide, if he had sene all the men of +a realme or nation fall downe before a woman? If he had sene the crowne, +sceptre, and sworde, whiche are ensignes of the royall dignitie, geuen +to her, and a woman cursed of God, and made subiecte to man, placed in +the throne of iustice, to sit as Goddes lieutenant? What, I say, in this +behalfe, shuld any hart vnfeinedlie fearing, God haue iudged of suche men? +I am assured that not onlie shulde they haue bene iudged foolishe but also +enraged, and sclaues to Satan, manifestlie fighting against God and his +apointed ordre. The more that I consider the subuersion of Goddes ordre, +which he hath placed generallie in all liuinge thinges, the more I do wondre +at the blindnes of man, who doth not consider him self in this case so +degenerate, that the brute beastes are to be preferred vnto him in this +behalfe<a NAME="an78"></a><sup><a href="#n78">[78]</a></sup>. For nature +hath in all beastes printed a certein marke of dominion in the male, and +a certeine subiection in the female, whiclie they kepe inuiolate. For no +man euer sawe the lion make obedience, and stoupe before the lionesse, +nether yet can it be proued, that the hinde taketh the conducting of the +heard amongest the hartes. And yet (alas) man, who by the mouth of God +hath dominion apointed to him ouer woman, doth not onlie to his own shame, +stoupe vnder the obedience of women, but also in despit of God and of his +apointed ordre, reioyseth, and mainteineth that monstruouse authoritie, +as a thing lauful and iust, The insolent ioy<a NAME="an79"></a><sup><a href="#n79">[79]</a></sup>, +the bonefiers, and banketing which were in london and els where in England, +when that cursed Iesabell was proclaimed qwene, did witnesse to my hart, +that men were becomen more then enraged. For els howe coulde they so haue +reioysed at their owne confusion and certein destruction? For what man +was there of so base iudgement (supposing that he had any light of God) +who did not see the erecting of that monstre, to be the ouerthrowe of true +religion, and the assured destruction of England, and of the auncient liberties +therof? And yet neuer the lesse, all men so triumphed, as if God had deliuered +them frome all calamitie.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n65"></a><i><a href="#an65">[65]</a>: De ciuit. Dei, lib. +19 cap. 13.</i> +<p><a NAME="n66"></a><i><a href="#an66">[66]</a>: what soener done withowt +the appointment of Goddes will is done withowt ordre.</i> +<p><a NAME="n67"></a><i><a href="#an67">[67]</a>: Two mirrors, in which +we may beholde the ordre of nature.</i> +<p><a NAME="n68"></a><i><a href="#an68">[68]</a>: Common welthes under +the rule of women, lacke a laufull heade</i> +<p><a NAME="n69"></a><i><a href="#an69">[69]</a>: Idol.</i> +<p><a NAME="n70"></a><i><a href="#an70">[70]:</a> Psal. 115.</i> +<p><a NAME="n71"></a><i><a href="#an71">[71]</a>: The empire of a woman +is an idol.</i> +<p><a NAME="n72"></a><i><a href="#an72">[72]</a>: I. COY. II</i> +<p><a NAME="n73"></a><i><a href="#an73">[73]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n74"></a><i><a href="#an74">[74]</a>: I. COY. II.</i> +<p><a NAME="n75"></a><i><a href="#an75">[75]</a>: Marke the similitude +of Chrysostome.</i> +<p><a NAME="n76"></a><i><a href="#an76">[76]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n77"></a><i><a href="#an77">[77]</a>: Howe women be couered +in England and Scotland.</i> +<p><a NAME="n78"></a><i><a href="#an78">[78]</a>: Brute beastes to be preferred.</i> +<p><a NAME="n79"></a><i><a href="#an79">[79]</a>: Insoluent ioy bringeth +sodein sorowe.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>But iust and rightuouse, terrible and fearfull are thy iudgements, +o Lorde! For as some times thou diddest so punishe men for vnthankfulnes<a NAME="an80"></a><sup><a href="#n80">[80]</a></sup>, +that man ashamed not to commit villanie withe man; and that because, that +knowinge the to be God, they glorified the not as God, euen so haste thou +moste iustlie nowe punished the proude rebellion and horrible ingratitude +of the realmes of England and Scotland. For when thou diddest offre thy +selfe moste mercifullie to them both, offering the meanes by the whiche +they might haue bene ioyned to gether for euer in godly Concorde: then +was the one proude and cruel, and the other vnconstant, and fikle of promise. +But yet (alas) did miserable England further rebell against the. For albeit +thou diddest not cease to heape benefit vpon benefit, during the reigne +of an innocent and tendre king, yet no man did acknowledge thy potent hand +and meruelouse working. The stoute courage of capitaines, the witte and +policie of counselors, the learning of bishoppes<a NAME="an81"></a><sup><a href="#n81">[81]</a></sup>, +did robbe the of thy glorie and honor. For what then was heard, as concerning +religion, but the kinges procedinges, the kinges procedinges must be obeyed? +It is enacted by parliament: therefore it is treason to speake in the contrarie. +But this was not the end of this miserable tragedie. For thou diddest yet +precede to offre thy fauors, sending thy prophetes and messagers, to call +for reformation of life in all estates<a NAME="an82"></a><sup><a href="#n82">[82]</a></sup>: +For euen frome the highest to the lowest, all were declined frome the (yea +euen those that shuld haue bene the lanterns to others) some I am assured +did qwake and tremble, and frome the botome of their hartes thirsted amendment, +and for the same purpose did earnestly call for discipline. But then brust +forth the venome which before lurked; then might they not conteine their +despiteful voices, but with open mouthes did crie: we will not haue suche +a one to reigne ouer vs. Then, I say, was euerie man so stoute, that he +wolde not be broght in bondage<a NAME="an83"></a><sup><a href="#n83">[83]:</a></sup> +no not to the, O Lord, but with disdein did the multitude cast frome them +the amiable yoke of Christ Iesus. No man wolde suffre his sinne to be rebuked, +no man wolde haue his life called to triall. And thus did they refuse the, +O Lorde, and thy sonne Christ Iesus to be their pastor, protector and prince. +And therfore hast thou geuen them ouer in to a reprobat minde. Thou hast +taken from them the spirit of boldnes, of wisdome and of rightuous iudgement. +They see their owne destruction, and yet they haue no grace to auoide it. +Yea they are becomen so blinde, that knowing the pit, they headlong cast +them selues into the same<a NAME="an84"></a><sup><a href="#n84">[84]</a></sup>; +as the nobilitie of England, do this day, fighting in the defense of their +mortall ennemie the Spaniard. Finallie they are so destitute of vnderstanding +and iudgement, that althogh they knowe that there is a libertie and fredome, +the whiche their predecessors haue inioyed; yet are they compelled to bowe +their neckes vnder the yoke of Satan, and of his proude ministres, pestilent +papistes and proude spaniardes. And yet can they not consider that where +a woman reigneth and papistes beare authoritie, that there must nedes Satan +be president of the counsel. Thus hast thou, O Lorde, in thy hote displeasure +reuenged the contempt of thy graces offred. But, O Lord, if thou shalt +reteine wrath to the end, what Aeshe is able to susteine? We haue sinned<a NAME="an85"></a><sup><a href="#n85">[85]</a></sup>, +O Lord, and are not worthy to be releued. But worthy art thou, O Lord, +to be a true God, and worthy is thy sonne Christ Iesus, to haue his Euangil +and glorie aduanced: whiche both are troden vnder foot in this cruell murther +and persecution, whiche the builders of Babylon commit in their furie, +haue raised against thy children, for the establishing of their kingdome. +Let the sobbes therfore of thy prisoners, O Lord, passe vp to thine eares, +consider their affliction: and let the eyes of thy mercie looke downe vpon +the blood of such as die for testimonie of thy eternal veritie: and let +not thine ennemies mocke thy iudgement for euer. To the, O Lorde, I turne +my wretched and wicked hart: to the alone, I direct my complaint and grones: +for in that Ile to thy saintes there is left no comfort. Albeit I haue +thus (talkinge with my God in the anguishe of my harte) some what digressed: +yet haue I not vtterlie forgotten my former proposition, to witt, that +it is a thing repugnant to the ordre of nature, that any woman be exalted +to rule ouer men. For God hath denied vnto her the office of a heade. And +in the intreating of this parte, I remembre that I haue made the nobilitie +both of England and Scotland inferior to brute beastes, for that they do +to women, which no male amongest the common sorte of beastes can be proued +to do their females: that is, they reuerence them, and qwake at their presence, +they obey their commandementes, and that against God. Wherfore I iudge +them not onelie subiectes to women, but sclaues of Satan, and seruantes +of iniquitie. If any man thinke these my wordes sharpe or vehement, let +him consider that the offense is more haynous, than can be expressed by +wordes. For where all thinges, be expressedly concluded against the glorie +and honor of God, and where the blood of the saintes of God is commanded +to be shed, whome shall we iudge, God or the deuil, to be president of +that counsel?<a NAME="an86"></a><sup><a href="#n86">[86]</a></sup> Plain +it is, that God ruleth not by his loue, mercie, nor grace in the assembly +of the vngocllie. Then it resteth, that the deuii, the prince of this worlde, +doth reigne ouer suche tyrannes. whose seruantes, I pray you, shal then +be iudged, such as obey, and execute, their tyrannie? God for his great +mercies sake, illuminate the eyes of men, that they may perceiue in to +what miserable bondage they be broght, by the monstriferous empire of women.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n80"></a><i><a href="#an80">[80]</a>: Rom. I.</i> +<p><a NAME="n81"></a><i><a href="#an81">[81]</a>: what robbed God OF HIS +HONOR in England in the time of the Gospell.</i> +<p><a NAME="n82"></a><i><a href="#an82">[82]</a>: Goddes benefites shewed +to England.</i> +<p><a NAME="n83"></a><i><a href="#an83">[83]</a>: Discipline refused in +England.</i> +<p><a NAME="n84"></a><i><a href="#an84">[84]</a>: The nobilitie and the +hole realme of England, caste themselues willingly in to the pit.</i> +<p><a NAME="n85"></a><i><a href="#an85">[85]</a>: Confession.</i> +<p><a NAME="n86"></a><i><a href="#an86">[86]</a>: NOTE</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>The seconde glasse, whiche God hath set before the eyes of man<a NAME="an87"></a><sup><a href="#n87">[87]</a></sup>, +wherein he may beholde the ordre, whiche pleaseth his wisdome, concerning +authoritie and dominion, is that common welth, to the whiche it pleaseth +his maiestie to apoint, and geue lawes, statutes, rites and ceremonies +not onelie concerninge religion, but also touching their policie and regiment +of the same. And against that ordre it doth manifestly repugne, that any +woman shall occupie the throne of God, that is, the royall seate, whiche +he by his worde hath apointed to man. As in geuing the lawe to Israel, +concerning the election of a king, is euident. For thus it is writen<a NAME="an88"></a><sup><a href="#n88">[88]</a></sup>: +If thou shalt say, I will apoint a king aboue me, as the rest of the nations, +whiche are aboute me: Thou shalt make the a kinge, whome the Lorde thy +God shall chose, one frome amongest the middest of thy bretheren, thou +shalt apointe kinge aboue the. Thou maist not make a strangier that is +not thy brother. Here expressedly is a man apointed to be chosen king, +and a man natiue amongest them selues, by whiche precept is all woman and +all strangier secluded. What may be obiected for the parte or election +of a strangier, shalbe, God willinge, answered in the blast of the second +trumpet. For this present, I say, that the erecting of a woman to that +honor, is not onely to inuert the ordre, which God hath established: but +also it is to defile, pollute and prophane (so farre as in man lieth) the +throne and seat of God, whiche he hath sanctified and apointed for man +onely<a NAME="an89"></a><sup><a href="#n89">[89]</a></sup>, in the course +of this wretched life, to occupie and possesse as his ministre and lieutenant: +secluding from the same all woman, as before is expressed. If anythinke +the fore writen lawe did bindethe Iewes onelie<a NAME="an90"></a><sup><a href="#n90">[90]</a></sup>, +let the same man consider, that the election of a kinge, and apointing +of iudges, did nether apperteine to the ceremoniall lawe, nether yet was +it mere iudiciall<a NAME="an91"></a><sup><a href="#n91">[91]</a></sup>: +but that it did flowe frome the morall lawe, as an ordinance, hauing respect +to the conseruation of both the tables. For the office of the magistrate +oght to haue the first and chief respect to the glorie of God, commanded +and conteined in the former table, as is euident by that, whiche was inioyned +to Iosue by God, what time he was accepted and admitted ruler and gouerner +ouer his people, in these wordes<a NAME="an92"></a><sup><a href="#n92">[92]</a></sup>: +Thou shalt diuide the inheritance to this people, the whiche I haue sworne +to their fathers, to geue vnto them: so that thou be valiant and strong, +that thou maist kepe and do, according to that hole lawe, whiche my seruant +Moses hath commanded the. Thou shalt not decline frome it, nether to the +right hande, nether to the left hand, that thou maist do prudentlie in +all thinges, that thou takest in hand, let not the boke of this lawe departe +from thy mouth, but meditate in it, day and night: that thou maist kepe +and do, according to euery thing, that is writen in it. For then shall +thy wayes prosper, and then shalt thou do prudently &c. And the same +precept geueth God by the mouth of Moses<a NAME="an93"></a><sup><a href="#n93">[93]</a></sup>, +to kinges, after they be elected, in these wordes<a NAME="an94"></a><sup><a href="#n94">[94]</a></sup>: +when he shal sit in the throne or seate of his kingdome, he shall write +to him self a copie of this lawe in a boke, and that shalbe with him, that +he may reade in it all the dayes of his life, that he may learne to feare +the Lorde his God, and to kepe all the wordes of this lawe, and all these +statutes, that he may do them &c. Of these two places it is euident, +that principallie it apperteineth to the king or to the chief magistrate, +to knowe the will of God, to be instructed in his lawe and statutes, and +to promote his glorie with his hole hart and studie, which be the chief +pointes of the first table. No man denieth, but that the sworde is committed +to the magistrate, to the end that he shulde punishe vice, and mainteine +vertue. To punishe vice I say, not onelie that, whiche troubleth the tranquillitie +and quiet estat of the common welth by adulterie, theft or murther committed<a NAME="an95"></a><sup><a href="#n95">[95]</a></sup>, +but also suche vices as openly impugne the glorie of God: as idolatrie, +blasphemie, and manifest heresie, taught and obstinatly mainteined: as +the histories and notable actes of Ezechias, Iosaphat, and Iosias do plainlie +teache vs. Whose study and care was not onlie to glorifie God in their +own life and conuersation, but also they vnfeinedlie did trauel to bring +subiectes to the true worshipping and honoring of God. And did destroye +all monumentes of idolatrie, did punishe to deathe the teachers of it, +and remoued frome office and honors suche, as were mainteiners of those +abominations. Wherbie I suppose that it be euident, that the office of +the king or supreme magistrate, hath respect to the lawe morall, and to +the conseruation of both the tables.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n87"></a><i><a href="#an87">[87]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n88"></a><i><a href="#an88">[88]</a>: Deut. 17.</i> +<p><a NAME="n89"></a><i><a href="#an89">[89]</a>: God hath apointed man +his ministre and lieutenant.</i> +<p><a NAME="n90"></a><i><a href="#an90">[90]</a>: Answer to an objection.</i> +<p><a NAME="n91"></a><i><a href="#an91">[91]</a>: The election of a king +floweth frome the moral lawe.</i> +<p><a NAME="n92"></a><i><a href="#an92">[92]</a>: Iosue I.</i> +<p><a NAME="n93"></a><i><a href="#an93">[93]</a>: Rulers should take hede +to this.</i> +<p><a NAME="n94"></a><i><a href="#an94">[94]</a>: Deut. 17</i> +<p><a NAME="n95"></a><i><a href="#an95">[95]</a>: what vices magistrates +oght to punishe.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>Nowe if the lawe morall, be the constant and vnchangeable will of God, +to the which the gentil is no lesse bounde, then was the Iewe<a NAME="an96"></a><sup><a href="#n96">[96]</a></sup>; +and if God will that amongest the gentiles, the ministres and executors +of his lawe be nowe apointed, as somtimes they were apointed amongest the +Iewes: further if the execution of iustice be no lesse requisite in the +policie of the gentiles, then euer it was amongest the Iewes: what man +can be foolishe to suppose or beleue, that God will nowe admit those persons, +to sit in iudgement or to reigne ouer men in the common welth of the gentiles, +whom he by his expressed word and ordinance, did before debarre and seclude +from the same? And that women were secluded from the royall seate, the +which oght to be the sanctuarie to all poore afflicted, and therfore is +iustlie called the seat of god (besides the place before recited of the +election of a king, and besides the places of the newe testament, whiche +be moste euident) the ordre and election which was kept in Iuda and Israel, +doth manifestlie declare. For when the males of the kinglie stocke failed<a NAME="an97"></a><sup><a href="#n97">[97]</a></sup>, +as oft as it chaunced in Israel and sometimes in Iuda, it neuer entered +in to the hartes of the people to chose and promote to honors any of the +kinges doughters, (had he neuer so many) but knowing Goddes vengeance to +be poured furth vpon the father by the away taking of his sonnes, they +had no further respect to his stocke, but elected suche one man or other, +as they iudged most apt for that honor and authoritie. Of whiche premisses, +I conclude (as before) that to promote a woman heade ouer men, is repugnant +to nature, and a thinge moste contrarious to that ordre, whiche God hath +approued in that common welth, whiche he did institute and rule by his +worde. But nowe to the last point, to wit, that the empire of a woman is +a thing repugnant to iustice, and the destruction of euerie common welth, +where it is receiued. In probation whereof, because the mater is more then +euident, I will vse fewe wordes. First, I say, if iustice be a constant +and perpetuall will to geue to euerie person, their own right (as the moste +learned in all ages haue defined it to be) then to geue, or to will to +geue to any person, that whiche is not their right, must repugne to iustice. +But to reigne aboue man, can neuer be the right to woman<a NAME="an98"></a><sup><a href="#n98">[98]</a></sup>: +because it is a thinge denied vnto her by God, as is before declared. Therfore +to promote her to that estat or dignitie, can be no thing els but repugnancie +to iustice. If I shulde speake no more, this were sufficient. For except +that ether they can improue the definition of iustice, or els that they +can intreate God to reuoke and call backe his sentence pronounced against +woman, they shalbe compelled to admit my conclusion. If any finde faute +with iustice, as it is defined, he may well accuse others, but me he shall +not hurt. For I haue the shield, the weapon, and the warrant of him, who +assuredlie will defend this quarel, and he commandeth me to crie:</td> + +<td><a NAME="n96"></a><i><a href="#an96">[96]</a>: NOTE. The gentil no +lesse bounde to the lawe moral then the Jewe.</i> +<p><a NAME="n97"></a><i><a href="#an97">[97]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n98"></a><i><a href="#an98">[98]:</a> The first argument that +the authoritie of women repungeth to iustice.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>What soeuer repugneth to the will of god expressed in his most sacred +worde, repugneth to iustice<a NAME="an99"></a><sup><a href="#n99">[99]</a></sup>: +but that women haue authoritie ouer men repugneth to the will of God expressed +in his worde: and therfore mine author commandeth me to conclude without +feare, that all suche authoritie repugneth to iustice. The first parte +of the argument I trust dare nether Iewe nor gentile denie: for it is a +principle not onelie vniuersallie confessed, but also so depelie printed +in the hart of man, be his nature neuer so corrupted, that whether he will +or no, he is compelled at one time or other, to acknowledge and confesse<a NAME="an100"></a><sup><a href="#n100">[100]</a></sup>, +that justice is violated, when thinges are done against the will of God, +expressed by his worde. And to this confession are no lesse the reprobate +coacted and constrained, then be the chosen children of god, albeit to +a diuers end. The elect with displeasure of their facte, confesse their +offense, hauing accesse to grace and mercie, as did Adam, Dauid, Peter, +and all other penitent offenders. But the reprobat<a NAME="an101"></a><sup><a href="#n101">[101]</a></sup>, +not withstanding they are compelled to acknowledge the will of God to be +iust the which they haue offended, yet are they neuer inwardlie displeased, +with their iniquitie, but rage, complain and storme against God, whose +vengeance they can not escape<a NAME="an102"></a><sup><a href="#n102">[102]</a></sup>: +as did Cain, Iudas, Herode, Iulian called apostata, Yea Iesabel; and Athalia. +For Cain no doubte was conuict in conscience, that he had done against +iustice in murthering of his brother. Iudas did openlie, before the high +priest confesse that he had sinned, in betraying innocent blood. Herode +being stricken by the angel, did mocke those his flaterers, saying vnto +them: beholde your God (meaning of him selfe) can not nowe preserue him +self frome corruption and wormes. Iulianus was compelled in the end to +crie, O galilean (so alwayes in contempt did he name our sauiour Iesus +Christ) thou hast nowe ouercomen. And who doubteth but Iesabel, and Athalia, +before their miserable end, were conuicted in their cankered consciences, +to acknowledge that the murther, which they had committed, and the empire +whiche the one had six yeares usurped, were repugnant to iustice: Euen +so shall they I doubt not, whiche this daye do possesse and mainteine that +monstriferous authoritie of women<a NAME="an103"></a><sup><a href="#n103">[103]</a></sup>, +shortlie be compelled to acknowledge, that their studies and deuises, haue +bene bent against God: and that all such as women haue usurped, repugneth +to iustice, because, as I haue saide, it repugneth to the will of God expressed +in his sacred worde. And if any man doubte herof, let him marke wel the +wordes of the apostle, saying<a NAME="an104"></a><sup><a href="#n104">[104]</a></sup>: +I permit not a woman to teache, nether yet to vsurpe authoritie aboue man. +No man I trust will denie these wordes of the apostle, to be the wil of +God expressed in his worde: and he saith openlie, I permit not &c. +Which is asmuch as, I will not, that a woman haue authority, charge or +power ouer man, for so much importeth the greke word [Greeek: anthentnin] +in that place. Nowe let man and angell conspire against God, let them pronounce +their lawes, and say, we will suffre women to beare authoritie, who then +can depose them? yet shall this one worde of the eternal God spoken by +the mouth of a weake man, thruste them euerie one in to hell. Iesabel may +for a time slepe quietlie in the bed of her fornication and hoordome, she +may teache and deceiue for a season<a NAME="an105"></a><sup><a href="#n105">[105]</a></sup>: +but nether shall she preserue her selfe, nether yet her adulterous children +frome greate affliction, and frome the sworde of Goddes vengeance, whiche +shall shortlie apprehend suche workes of iniquitie. The admonition I differe +to the end.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n99"></a><i><a href="#an99">[99]:</a> The second argument.</i> +<p><a NAME="n100"></a><i><a href="#an100">[100]</a>: Nature doth confesse +that repugnancie to Goddes will is iniustice.</i> +<p><a NAME="n101"></a><i><a href="#an101">[101]</a>: the reprobat confesse +Goddes will iust.</i> +<p><a NAME="n102"></a><i><a href="#an102">[102]</a>: Genes. 4. Mat. 27.</i> +<p><a NAME="n103"></a><i><a href="#an103">[103]</a>: womans authoritie +bringeth forth monstres.</i> +<p><a NAME="n104"></a><i><a href="#an104">[104]</a>: Tim. 2.</i> +<p><a NAME="n105"></a><i><a href="#n105">[105]</a>: Apoca. 2.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>Here might I bring in the oppression and iniustice, which is committed +against realmes and nations, whiche some times liued free, and now are +broght in bondage of forein nations, by the reason of this monstriferous +authoritie and empire of women. But that I delay till better oportunitie. +And now I think it expedient to answer such obiections, as carnal and worldlie +men, yea men ignorant of God, vse to make for maintenance of this tyrannic +(authoritie it is not worthie to be called) and most vniuste empire of +woman.</td> + +<td></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>First they do obiect the examples of Debora<a NAME="an107"></a><sup><a href="#n106">[106]</a></sup>, +and of Hulda the prophetesse, of whom the one iudged Israel, and the other, +by all apparance, did teache and exhorte.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n106"></a><i><a href="#an106">[106]</a>: Iudic.4 Parn.3. The +defenses of the aduersaries</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>Secondarily they do obiect the lawe<a NAME="an107"></a><sup><a href="#n107">[107]</a></sup> +made by Moses for the doughters of zalphead. Thirdlie the consent of the +estates of such realmes as haue approued the empire and regiment of women. +And last the longcustome, which hath receiued the regiment of women. Their +valiant actes and prospesitie, together with some papistical lawes, which +haue confirmed the same.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n107"></a><i><a href="#an107">[107]</a>: Num. 27</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td><a NAME="firstobj"></a>To the first, I answer, that particular examples +do establishe no common lawe<a NAME="an108"></a><sup><a href="#n108">[108]</a></sup>. +The causes were knowen to God alon, why he toke the spirite of wisdome +and force frome all men of those ages, and did so mightely assist women +against nature, and against his ordinarie course: that the one he made +a deliuerer to his afflicted people Israel: and to the other he gaue not +onlie perseuerance in the true religion, when the moste parte of men had +declined from the same, but also to her he gaue the spirit of prophecie, +to assure king Iosias of the thinges which were to come. With these women, +I say, did God worke potentlie, and miraculouslie, yea to them he gaue +moste singular grace and priuiledge. But who hath commanded, that a publike, +yea a tyrannicall and moste wicked lawe be established vpon these examples? +The men that obiect the same, are not altogether ignorant, that examples +haue no strength, when the question is of lawe<a NAME="an109"></a><sup><a href="#n109">[109]</a></sup>. +As if I shuld aske, what mariage is laufull? and it shulde be answered +that laufull it is to man, not onelie to haue manie wiues at ones, but +also it is laufull to marie two sisters, and to enioye them both liuing +at ones, because that Dauid, Iacob, and Salomon, seruantes of God did the +same. I trust that no man wold iustifie the vanitie of this reason. Or +if the question were demanded, if a Christian, with good conscience may +defraude, steale or deceiue: and answer were made that so he might by the +example of the Israelites, who at Goddes commandement, deceiued the Egyptians, +and spoiled them of their garmentes, golde and syluer. I thinke likewise +this reason shuld be mocked. And what greater force, I pray you, hath the +former argument? Debora did rule in Israel, and Hulda spoke prophecie in +Iuda: Ergo it is laufull for women to reigne aboue realmes and nations, +or to teache in the presence of men<a NAME="an110"></a><sup><a href="#n110">[110]</a></sup>. +The consequent is vain and of none effect. For of examples, as is before +declared, we may establishe no lawe, but we are alwayes bounde to the lawe +writen, and to the commandement expressed in the same. And the lawe writen +and pronounced by God, forbiddeth no lesse that any woman reigne ouer man, +then it forbiddeth man to take pluralitie of wiues, to mary two sisters +liuing at ons, to steale, to robbe, to murther or to lie. If any of these +hath bene transgressed, and yet God hath not imputed the same: it maketh +not the like fact or dede lawfull vnto vs. For God being free, may for +suche causes as be approued by his inscrutable wisdome, dispense with the +rigor of his lawe, and may vse his creatures at his pleasure. But the same +power is not permitted to man, whom he hath made subiect to his lawe, and +not to the examples of fathers. And this I thinke sufficient to the reasonable +and moderate spirites. But to represse the raging of womans madnes, I will +descend somwhat deeper in to the mater, and not feare to affirme: that +as we find a contrarie spirit in all these moste wicked women, that this +day be exalted in to this tyrannouse authoritie, to the spirite that was +in those godly matrons: so I feare not, I say, to affirme, that their condition +is vnlike, and that their end shalbe diuers. In those matrones we finde +that the spirit of mercie, truthe, iustice and of humilitie did reigne<a NAME="an111"></a><sup><a href="#n111">[111]</a></sup>. +Vnder them we finde that God did shewe mercie to his people, deliuering +them frome the tyrannie of strangiers, and from the venom of idolatrie +by the handes and counsel of those women: but in these of our ages, we +finde crueltie, falshed, pride, couetousnes, deceit, and oppression. In +them we also finde the spirit of Iesabel, and Athalia, vnder them we finde +the simple people oppressed, the true religion extinguished, and the blood +of Christes membres most cruellie shed. And finallie by their practises +and deceit, we finde auncient realmes and nations geuen and betrayed in +to the handes of strangiers, the titles and liberties of them taken frome +the iuste possessors. Which one thinge is an euident testimonie, howe vnlike +our mischeuous Maryes be vnto Debora, vnder whome were strangiers chased +owt of Israel, God so raising her vp to be a mother and deliuerer to his +oppressed people. But (alas) he hath raised vp these Iesabelles to be the +vttermoste of his plagues<a NAME="an112"></a><sup><a href="#n112">[112]</a></sup>, +the whiche mans vnthankfulnes hath long deserued. But his secret and most +iust iudgement, shal nether excuse them, neither their mainteiners, because +their counsels be diuers. But to prosecute my purpose, let such as list +to defend these monstres in their tyrannie, prbue first, that their souereine +maistresses be like to Debora in godlines and pitie: and secondarilie, +that the same successe doth folowe their tyrannie, which did folowe the +extraorelinarie regiment of that godlie matrone. Which things althogh they +were able to do<a NAME="an113"></a><sup><a href="#n113">[113]</a></sup> +(as they neuer shalbe, let them blowe til they brust) yet shall her example +profet them nothing at all. For they are neuer able to proue that ether +Debora, or any other godlie woman<a NAME="an114"></a><sup><a href="#n114">[114]</a></sup> +(hauing the commendation of the holie ghoste within the scriptures) hath +vsurped authoritie aboue any realme or nation, by reason of their birth +and blood. Nether yet did they claime it by right or inheritance: but God +by his singular priuiledge, fauor, and grace, exempted Debora from the +common malediction geuen to women in that behalf: and against nature he +made her prudent in counsel, strong in courage, happie in regiment, and +a blessed mother and deliuerer to his people. The whiche he did partlie +to aduance and notifie the power of his maiestie as well to his ennemies, +as +to his owne people<a NAME="an115"></a><sup><a href="#n115">[115]</a></sup>: +in that that he declared himself able to geue saluation and deliuerance, +by meanes of the moste weake vesselles: and partlie he did it to confound +and ashameall man of that age, because they had for the moste part declined +frome his true obedience. And therfore was the spirit of courage, regiment, +and boldnes taken from them for a time to their confusion and further humiliation. +But what maketh this for Mary and her matche Phillippe? One thing I wold +aske of suche as depend vpon the example of Debora, whether she was widowe +or wife, when she iudged Israel, and when that God gaue that notable victorie +to his people vnder her? If they answer she was widowe, I wold lay against +them the testimonie of the holie ghost, witnessinge that she was wife to +Lapidoth<a NAME="an116"></a><sup><a href="#n116">[116]</a></sup>. And if +they will shift, and alledge, that so she might be called, notwithstanding +that her husband was dead, I vrge them further, that they are not able +to, proue it to be any common phrase and maner of speache in the scriptures, +that a woman shall be called the wife of a dead man, except that there +be some note added, wherbie it may be knowen that her husband is departed, +as is witnessed of Anna<a NAME="an117"></a><sup><a href="#n117">[117]</a></sup>. +But in this place of the iudges, there is no note added, that her husband +shuld be dead, but rather the expressed contrarie<a NAME="an118"></a><sup><a href="#n118">[118]</a></sup>. +For the text saith: In that time a woman named Debora a prophetesse, wife +to Lapidoth iudged Israel, The holie ghost plainlie speaketh, that what +time she iudged Israel, she was wife to Lapidoth. If she was wife, and +if she ruled all alone in Israel<a NAME="an119"></a><sup><a href="#n119">[119]</a></sup>, +then I aske why did she not preferre her husband to that honor to be capitain, +and to be leader to the host of the Lord. If any thinke that it was her +husbande, the text proueth the contrarie. For it affirmeth that Barak, +of the tribe of Nephtalie was apointed to that office. If Barak had bene +her husband: to what purpose shuld the holie ghost so diligentlie haue +noted the tribe, and an other name then was before expressed? Yea to what +purpose shuld it be noted, that she send and called him? whereof I doubt +not, but that euerie reasonable man doth consider that this Barak was not +her husband, and therof likwise it is euident, that her iudgement or gouernement +in Israel was no such vsurped power, as our quenes vniustlie possesse this +day, but that it was the spirit of prophecie, which rested vpon her, what +time the multitude of the people wroght wickedlie in the eyes of the Lord: +by the whiche spirit, she did rebuke the idolatrie and iniquitie of the +people, exhort them to repentance, and in the end, did bring them this +comfort, that God shuld deliuer them from the bondage and thraldom of their +ennemies. And this she might do<a NAME="an120"></a><sup><a href="#n120">[120]</a></sup>, +not withstanding that an other did occupie the place of the supreme magistral, +(if any was in those dayes in Israel) for, so I finde did Hulda the wife +of Sallum in the dayes of Iosias king of Iuda<a NAME="an121"></a><sup><a href="#n121">[121]</a></sup> +'speake prophecie and comfort the king': and yet he resigned to her nether +the sceptre; nor the sword. That this our interpretacion, how that Debora +did iudge in Israel is the true meaning of the holie ghost, the pondering +and weying of the historic shall manifestlie proue. When she sendeth for +Barak, I pray you, in whose name geueth she him his charge?<a NAME="an122"></a><sup><a href="#n122">[122] +</a></sup>Doth +she speake to him as kinges and princes vse to speake to their subiectes +in suche cases? No, but she speaketh, as she that had a speciall reuelation +frome God, whiche nether was knovren to Barak nor to the people, saying: +hath not the Lord God of Israel commanded the? This is her preface, by +the whiche she wold stirre vp the dull senses of Barak, and of the people, +willing to persuade vnto them, that the time was comen, when God wold shewe +him selfe their protector and deliuerer, in which preface she vsurpeth +to her selfe, nether power nor authoritie. For she saith not, I being thy +princes, thy maistresse, thy souereine ladie and quene, commatide the vpon +thine allegeance, and vnder pain of treason to go, and gather an armie. +No, she spoileth her self of all power to commande, attributing that authoritie +to God, of whom she had her reuelation and certitude to apoint Barak capitain, +which after appeareth more plainlie. For when she had declared to him the +hole counsel of God, apointing vnto him aswell the nombre of his souldiors, +as the tribes, owt of which they shuld be gathered: and when she had apointed +the place of the batel, (whiche she coulde not haue done, but by especiall +reuelation of God) and had assured him of victorie in the name of God, +and yet that he fainted and openlie refused, to entre in to that iourney +except that the prophetesse wold accompanie him, she did vse against him +no external power, she did not threaten him with rebellion and death, but +for assurance of his faint hart and weake conscience, being content to +go with him, she pronounceth, that the glorie shulde not be his in that +iourney, but that the Lord shuld sell Sisera in to the hand of a woman. +Such as haue more pleasure in light then in darknes, may clearlie perceiue, +that Debora did vsurpe no such power nor authoritie, as our quenes do this +day claime. But that she was indued with the spirit of wisdome, of knowledge, +and of the true feare of God: and by the same she iudged the factes of +the rest of the people. She rebuked their defection and idolatry, yea and +also did redresse to her power, the iniuries, that were done by man to +man. But all this, I say, she did by the spirituall sworde, that is, by +the worde of God, and not by any temporall regiment or authoritie, whiche +she did vsurpe ouer Israel. In which, I suppose, at that time there, was +no laufull magistrate, by the reason of their greate affliction. For so +witnesseth the historic, saying: And Ehud being dead, the Lorde sold Israel +in to the hand of Iabin king of Canaan. And he by Sisera his capitain afflicted +Israel greatlie the space of twentie yeares. And Debora her self, in her +song of thankes geuing, confesseth that before she did arise mother in +Israel, and in the dayes of Iael, there was nothing but confusion and trouble. +If any sticke to the terme, alledging that the holie ghost saith, that +she iudged Israel<a NAME="an123"></a><sup><a href="#n123">[123]</a></sup>: +let them vnderstand, that nether doth the Ebrue word, nether yet the Latin, +alwayes signifie ciuile iudgement, or the execution of the temporall sword, +but most commonlie is taken in the sense, which we haue before expressed. +For of Christ it is said: he shal iudge many nations. And that he shall +pronounce iudgement to the gentiles<a NAME="an124"></a><sup><a href="#n124">.[124]</a></sup> +And yet it is euident, that he was no minister of the temporal sword. God +commandeth Ierusalem and Iuda to iudge betwixt him and his vineyarde, and +yet he apointed not them all to be ciuil magistrates. To Ezechiel it is +said<a NAME="an125"></a><sup><a href="#n125">[125]</a></sup>: shalt thou +not iudge them sonne of man? and after: thou sonne of man, shalt thou not +iudge? shalt thou not iudge, I say, the citie of blood? and also: behold, +I shall iudge betwixt beast and beast. And such places in great nombre, +are to be founde thrughout the hole scriptures, and yet I trust, no man +wilbe so foolish, as to thinke that any of the Prophetes were apointed +by God to be politike iudges, or to punishe the sinnes of man, by corporal +punishment. No the maner of their iudgement is expressed in these wordes<a NAME="an126"></a><sup><a href="#n126">[126]</a></sup>: +Declare to them all their abominations, and thou shalt say to them: Thus +saith the Lorde God: a citie shedding blood in the middest of her, that +her time may approche and which hath made idoles against her selfe, that +she might be polluted. Thou hast transgressed in the blood which thou hast +shed, and thou are polluted in the idoles, which thou hast made. Thus, +I say, do the prophetes of God iudge, pronouncing the sentence of God against +malefactors. And so I doubt not but Debora iudged, what time Israel had +declined from God: rebuking their defection, and exhorting them to repentance, +without vsurpation of any ciuill authoritie. And if the people gaue vnto +her for a time any reuerence or honour, as her godlines and happie counsel +did well deserue, yet was it no such empire, as our monstres claime<a NAME="an127"></a><sup><a href="#n127">[127]</a></sup>. +For which of her sonnes or nerest kinsmen left she ruler and iudge in Israel +after her. The holie ghost expresseth no such thing. Wherof it is euident, +that by her example God offreth no occasion to establish any regiment of +women aboue men, realmes, and nations.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n108"></a><i><a href="#an108">[108]:</a> <a href="#ablastobj">Answer +to the first obiection.</a></i> +<p><a NAME="n109"></a><i><a href="#an109">[109]</a>: Examples against lawe +haue no strength when the question is of lawe.</i> +<p><a NAME="n110"></a><i><a href="#an110">[110]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n111"></a><i><a href="#an111">[111]</a>: Antithesis betwixt +the former matrones, and our Iesabelles.</i> +<p><a NAME="n112"></a><i>[<a href="#an112">112]:</a> NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n113"></a><i><a href="#an113">[113]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n114"></a><i><a href="#an114">[114]</a>: No godlie woman did +euer claime authoritie ouer man by reason of her birth and blood.</i> +<p><a NAME="n115"></a><i><a href="#an115">[115]</a>: Why God sometimes +worketh by extraordinarie meanes.</i> +<p><a NAME="n116"></a><i><a href="#an116">[116]</a>: Iudic. 4.</i> +<p><a NAME="n117"></a><i><a href="#an117">[117]</a>: Luc. 2</i> +<p><a NAME="n118"></a><i><a href="#an118">[118]</a>: Iudic. 4</i> +<p><a NAME="n119"></a><i><a href="#an119">[119]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n120"></a><i><a href="#an120">[120]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n121"></a><i><a href="#an121">[121]:</a> 2. Reg. 22.</i> +<p><a NAME="n122"></a><i><a href="#an122">[122]</a>: Debora commanded not +as princes vse to commande.</i> +<p><a NAME="n123"></a><i><a href="#an123">[123]</a>: To iudge is not alway +understand of the ciuil regiment.</i> +<p><a NAME="n124"></a><i><a href="#an124">[124]</a>: Isaie 2. Isaie 42. +Mich. 4. Isaie. 5.</i> +<p><a NAME="n125"></a><i><a href="#an125">[125]</a>: Ezech. 20. Ezech. +22. Ezech. 34</i> +<p><a NAME="n126"></a><i><a href="#an126">[126]</a>: Ezech. 23</i> +<p><a NAME="n127"></a><i><a href="#an127">[127]</a>: NOTE.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>But now to the second obiection<a NAME="an128"></a><sup><a href="#n128">[128]</a></sup>. +In whiche women require (as to them appeareth) nothing but equitie and +iustice. Whilest they and their patrones for them, require dominion and +empire aboue men. For this is their question: Is it not lauful, that women +haue their right and inheritance, like as the doughters of Zalphead were +commanded by the mouth of Moses to haue their portion of grounde in their +tribe?</td> + +<td><a NAME="n128"></a><i><a href="#an128">[128]</a>: An answer to the +second obiection.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>I answer, it is not onlie laufull that women possesse their inheritance, +but I affirme also that iustice and equitie require, that so they do. But +therwith I adde that whiche gladlie they list not vnderstand<a NAME="an129"></a><sup><a href="#n129">[129]</a></sup>: +that to beare rule or authoritie ouer man, can neuer be right nor inheritance +to woman. For that can neuer be iust inheritance to any person, whiche +God by his word hath plainlie denied vnto them: but to all women hath God +denied authoritie aboue man, as moste manifestlie is before declared: Therfore +to her it can neuer be inheritance. And thus must the aduocates of our +ladies prouide some better example and strongar argument. For the lawe +made in fauor of the doughters of Zalphead, will serue them nothing. And +assuredlie greate wonder it is, that in so greate light of Goddes truthe, +men list to grope and wander in darknes. For let them speak of conscience<a NAME="an130"></a><sup><a href="#n130">[130]</a></sup>: +if the petition of any of these fore named women was to reigne ouer any +one tribe, yea or yet ouer any one man within Israel. Plain it is, they +did not, but onelie required, that they might haue a portion of ground +amonge the men of their tribe, lest, that the name of their father shuld +be abolished. And this was graunted vnto them without respect had to any +ciuil regiment. And what maketh this, I pray you, for the establishing +of this monstruous empire of women? The question is not: if women may not +succede to possession, substance patrimonie or inheritance, such as fathers +may leaue to their children, for that I willinglie grant<a NAME="an131"></a><sup><a href="#n131">[131]</a></sup>: +But the question is: if women may succede to their fathers in offices, +and chieflie to that office, the executor wherof doth occupie the place +and throne of God. And that I absolutelie denie: and feare not to say, +that to place a woman in authoritie aboue a realme, is to pollute and prophane +the royall seate, the throne of iustice, which oght to be the throne of +God: and that to mainteine them in the same, is nothing els, but continuallie +to rebell against God. One thing there is yet to be noted and obserued +in the lawe<a NAME="an132"></a><sup><a href="#n132">[132]</a></sup> made +concerning the inheritance of the doughters of Zalphead, to wit, that it +was forbidden vnto them to marie without their owne tribe, lest that such +portion as fell to their lotte, shuld be transferred frome one tribe to +an other, and so shuld the tribe of Manasses be defrauded and spoiled of +their iust inheritance by their occasion. For auoiding of which it was +commanded by Moses, that they should marie in the familie or housholde +of the tribe and kindred of their father. Wonder it is that the aduocates +and patrones of the right of our ladies did not consider and ponder this +lawe<a NAME="an133"></a><sup><a href="#n133">[133]</a></sup> before that +they counseled the blinde princes and vnworthie nobles of their countries, +to betray the liberties therof in to the handes of strangiers. England +for satisfying of the inordinat appetites of that cruell monstre Marie +(vnworthie by reason of her bloodie tyrannie, of the name of a woman) betrayed +(alas) to the proude spaniarde: and Scotlande by the rashe madnes of foolish +gouerners, and by the practises of a craftie dame resigned likewise, vnder +title of mariage in to the power of France. Doth such translation of realmes +and nations please the iustice of God, or is the possession by such means +obteined, lauful in his sight? Assured I am that it is not<a NAME="an134"></a><sup><a href="#n134">[134]</a></sup>. +No other wise, I say, then is that possession, wherunto theues, murtherers, +tyrannes and oppressors do attein by theft, murther, tyrannie, violence, +deceit, and oppression, whiche God of his secrete (but yet most iust) iudgement +doth often permit for punishment, as wel of the sufferers, as of the violent +oppressors, but doth neuer approue the same as laufull and godlie. For +if he wold not permit that the inheritance of the children of Israel shuld +passe frome one tribe to an other by the mariage of any doughter, not withstanding<a NAME="an135"></a><sup><a href="#n135">[135] +</a></sup>that +they were all one people, all spake one tonge, all were descended of one +father, and all did professe one God, and one religion: If yet, I say, +God wold not suffer that the commoditie and vsuall frute, which might be +gathered of the portion of grounde limited and assigned to one tribe shulde +passe to an other: Will he suffer that the liberties, lawes, commodities +and frutes of hole realmes and nations, be geuen in to the power and distribution +of others, by the reason of mariage, and in the powers of suche, as besides, +that they be of a strange tonge, of strange maners and lawes, they are +also ignorant of God, ennemies to his truth, deniers of Christ Iesus, persecutors +of his true membres, and haters of all vertue? As the odious nation of +spaniardes doth manifestlie declare: who for very despit, which they do +beare against Christe Iesus, whome their forefathers did crucifie (for +Iewes they are<a NAME="an136"></a><sup><a href="#n136">[136]</a></sup>, +as histories do witnesse, and they them selues confesse) do this day make +plaine warre against all true professors of his holie gospell. And howe +blindlie and outragiouslie the frenche king, and his pestilent prelates +do, fight against the veritie of God, the flaming fiers, which lick vp +the innocent blood of Christes membres, do witnesse, and by his cruel edictes +is notified and proclaimed<a NAME="an137"></a><sup><a href="#n137">[137]</a></sup>. +And yet to these two cruell tyrannes (to France, and Spain I meane) is +the right and possession of England and Scotland apointed. But iust or +laufull shall that possession neuer be, till God do chaunge the statute +of his former lawe: whiche he will not do for the pleasure of man. For +he hath not created the earth to satisfie the ambition of two or three +tyrannes, but for the vniuersall seed of Adam<a NAME="an138"></a><sup><a href="#n138">[138]</a></sup>: +and hath apointed and defined the boundes of their habitation to diuerse +nations, assigning diuers countries as he him selfe confesseth, speaking +to Israel in these wordes<a NAME="an139"></a><sup><a href="#n139">[139]</a></sup>: +You shal passe by the boundes and limiter, of your bretheren the sonnes +of Esau, who dwell in mount Seir. They shall feare you. But take diligent +hede, that ye shewe not your selues cruell against them. For I will geue +you no part of their land. No not the bredth of a foote. For mount Seir +I haue geuen to Esau to be possessed. And the same he doth witnesse of +the sonnes of Lot<a NAME="an140"></a><sup><a href="#n140">[140]</a></sup>, +to whom he had geuen Arre to be possessed. And Moses plainlie affirmeth, +that when the almightie did distribute, and diuide possessions to the gentiles, +and when he did disperse, and scatter the sonnes of men, that then he did +apoint the limites and boundes of peoples, for the nomber of the sonnes +of Israel. Wherof it is plain<a NAME="an141"></a><sup><a href="#n141">[141]</a></sup>, +that God hath not exposed the earth in pray to tyrannes, making all thing +laufull, which by violence and murther they may possesse, but that he hath +apointed to euery seuerall nation, a seuerall possession, willing them +to stand content (as nature did teache an ethnik<a NAME="an142"></a><sup><a href="#n142">[142]</a></sup> +to affirme) with that portion, which by lotte and iust meanes they had +mioyed. For what causes God permitteth this his distribution to be troubled, +and the realmes of auncient nations to be possessed of strangiers, I delay +at this time to intreate. Onlie this I haue recited to geue the worlde +to vnderstand, that the reigne, empire, and authoritie of women<a NAME="an143"></a><sup><a href="#n143">[143]</a></sup>, +hath no grounde within Goddes scriptures. Yea that realmes or prouinces +possessed by their mariage, is nothinge but vniust conquest. For so litle +doth the lawe made for the doughters of Zalphead helpe the cause of your +quenes, that vtterlie it fighteth against them, both damning their authoritie +and fact. But now to the thirde objection.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n129"></a><i><a href="#an129">[129]</a>: what woman wold not +gladly heare.</i> +<p><a NAME="n130"></a><i><a href="#an130">[130]</a>: the daughters of Zalphead +desired to reigne ouer no man in Israel.</i> +<p><a NAME="n131"></a><i><a href="#an131">[131]</a>: women may succede +to inheritance but not to office.</i> +<p><a NAME="n132"></a><i><a href="#an132">[132]</a>: Num. 36</i> +<p><a NAME="133"></a><i><a href="#an133">[133]</a>: Our patrones for women +do not marke this caution.</i> +<p><a NAME="n134"></a><i><a href="#an134">[134]</a>: Realmes gotten by +practises +are no iuste posession.</i> +<p><a NAME="n135"></a><i><a href="#an135">[135]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n136"></a><i><a href="#an136">[136]</a>: The spaniardes are +Iewes and they bragge that Marie of England is the roote of Iesse.</i> +<p><a NAME="n137"></a><i><a href="#an137">[137]</a>: Note the law which +he hath proclaimed in France against such as he termeth Lutherians.</i> +<p><a NAME="n138"></a><i><a href="#an138">[138]</a>: Act. 17.</i> +<p><a NAME="n139"></a><i><a href="#an139">[139]</a>: Deuter. 2.</i> +<p><a NAME="n140"></a><i><a href="#an140">[140]</a>: Deut.32.</i> +<p><a NAME="n141"></a><i><a href="#an141">[141]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n142"></a><i><a href="#an142">[142]</a>: Cicero offic. lib. +I.</i> +<p><a NAME="n143"></a><i><a href="#an143">[143]</a>: Realmes gotten by +mariage, is uniust conquest.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>The consent, say they, of realmes and lawes pronounced and admitted +in this behalfe, long consuetude and custorne, together with felicitie +of some women in their empires haue established their authoritie<a NAME="an144"></a><sup><a href="#n144">[144]</a></sup>. +To whome, I answer, that nether may the tyrannie of princes, nether the +foolishnes of people, nether wicked lawes made against God, nether yet +the felicitie that in this earthe may herof insue, make that thing laufull, +whiche he by his word hath manifestlie condemned. For if the approbation +of princes and people, lawes made by men, or the consent of realmes, may +establishe any thing against God and his word, then shuld idolatrie be +preferred to the true religion. For mo realmes and nations, mo lawes and +decrees published by Emperours with common consent of their counsels, haue +established the one, then haue approued the other. And yet I thinke that +no man of sounde iudgement, will therfore iustifie and defend idolatrie. +No more oght any man to mainteine this odious empire of women, althogh +that it were approued of all men by their lawes. For the same God that +in plain wordes forbiddeth idolatrie, doth also forbidde the authoritie +of women ouer man. As the wordes of saint Paule before rehearsed do plainly +teach vs. And therfore whether women be deposed from that vniust authoritie<a NAME="an145"></a><sup><a href="#n145">[145]</a></sup> +(haue they neuer vsurped it so long) or if all such honor be denied vnto +them, I feare not to affirme that they are nether defrauded of right, nor +inheritance. For to women can that honor neuer be due nor laufull (muche +lesse inheritance) whiche God hath so manifestlie denied vnto them.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n144"></a><i><a href="#an144">[144]</a>: Answer to the third +obiection.</i> +<p><a NAME="n145"></a><i><a href="#an145">[145]</a>: women may and oght +to be deposed from authoritie.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>I am not ignorant that the subtill wittes of carnall men (which can +neuer be broght vnder obedience of Goddes simple preceptes to maintein +this monstruous empire) haue yet two vaine shiftes<a NAME="an146"></a><sup><a href="#n146">[146]</a></sup>. +First they alledge, that albeit women may not absolutelie reigne by themselues, +because they may nether sit in iudgement, nether pronounce sentence, nether +execute any publike office: yet may they do all such thinges by their lieutenantes, +deputies and iudges substitute. Secondarilie, say they, a woman borne to +rule ouer anyrealme, may chose her a husband, and to him she may transfer +and geue her authoritie and right. To both I answer in fewe wordes. First +that frome a corrupt and venomed fountein can spring no holsome water: +Secondarilie that no person hath power to geue the thing, which doth not +iustlie appertein to them selues<a NAME="an147"></a><sup><a href="#n147">[147]</a></sup>: +But the authoritie of a woman is a corrupted fountein, and therfore from +her can neuer spring any lauful officer. She is not borne to rule ouer +men: and therfore she can apointe none by her gift, nor by her power (which +she hathn ot) to the place of a laufull magistrat. And therfore who soeuer +receiueth of a woman<a NAME="an148"></a><sup><a href="#n148">[148]</a></sup>, +office or authoritie, are adulterous and bastard officers before God. This +may appeare straunge at the first affirmation, but if we will be as indifferent +and equall in the cause of God, as that we can be in the cause of man, +the reason shall sodeinlie appeare. The case suposed, that a tyranne by +conspiracie vsurped the royall seat and dignitie of a king, and in the +same did so established him selfe, that he apointed officers, and did what +him list for a time, and in this meane time, the natiue king made streit +inhibition to all his subiectes, that none shuld adhere to this traitor, +nether yet receiue any dignitie of him, yet neuer the lesse they wold honor +the same traitor as king, and becomme his officers in all affaires of the +realme. If after, the natiue prince did recouer his iust honor and possession, +shuld he repute or esteme any man of the traitors apointement for a laufull +magistrate? or for his frende and true subiect? or shuld he not rather +with one sentence condemne the head with the membres? And if so he shuld +do, who were able to accuse him of rigor? much lesse to condemne his sentence +of iniustice. And dare we denie the same power to God in the like case? +For that woman reigneth aboue man, she hath obteined it by treason and +conspiracie committed against God. Howe can it be then, that she being +criminall and giltie of treason against God committed, can apointe any +officer pleasing in his sight? It is a thing impossible<a NAME="an149"></a><sup><a href="#n149">[149]</a></sup>. +Wherefore let men that receiue of women authoritie, honor or office, be +most assuredly persuaded, that in so mainteining that vsurped power, they +declare them selues ennemies to God. If any thinke, that because the realme +and estates therof, haue geuen their consentes to a woman, and haue established +her, and her authoritie: that therfore it is laufull and acceptable before +God: let the same men remembre what I haue said before, to wit, that God +can not approue the doing nor consent of any multitude, concluding any +thing against his worde and ordinance, and therfore they must haue a more +assured defense against the wrath of God, then the approbation and consent +of a blinded multitude, or elles they shall not be able to stand in the +presence of the consuming fier: that is, they must acknowledge that the +regiment of a woman is a thing most odious in the presence of God. They +must refuse to be her officers[<a NAME="an150"></a><sup><a href="#n150">150]</a></sup>, +because she is a traitoresse and rebell against God. And finallie they +must studie to represse her inordinate pride and tyrannie to the vttermost +of their power. The same is the dutie of the nobilitie and estates, by +whose blindnes a woman is promoted. First in so farre, as they haue moste +haynouslie offended against God, placing in authoritie suche as God by +his worde hath remoued frome the same, vnfeinedly they oght to call for +mercie, and being admonished of their error and damnable fact, in signe +and token of true repentance, with common consent they oght to retreate +that, which vnaduisedlie and by ignorance they haue pronounced, and oght +without further delay to remoue from authority all such persones, as by +vsurpation, violence, or tyrannie, do possesse the same. For so did Israel +and Iuda after they had reuolted from Dauid, and Iuda alone in the dayes +of Athalia<a NAME="an151"></a><sup><a href="#n151">[151]</a></sup>. For +after that she by murthering her sonnes children, had obteined the empire +ouer the land, and had most vnhappelie reigned in Iuda six years, Ichoiada +the high priest called together the capitaines and chief rulers of the +people<a NAME="an152"></a><sup><a href="#n152">[152]</a></sup>, and shewing +to them the kinges sonne Ioas[h], did binde them by an othe to depose that +wicked woman, and to promote the king to his royall seat, which they faithfullie +did, killinge at his commandement not onlie that cruell and mischeuous +woman, but also the people did destroie the temple of Baal, break his altars +and images, and kill Mathan Baales high priest before his altars. The same +is the dutie aswell of the estates, as of the people that hath bene blinded. +First they oght to remoue frome honor and authoritie, that monstre in nature. +(so call I a woman cled in the habit of man, yea a woman against nature +reigning aboue man). Secondarilie if any presume to defende that impietie, +they oght not to feare, first to pronounce, and then after to execute against +them the sentence of deathe. If any man be affraid to violat the oth of +obedience, which they haue made to suche monstres, let them be most assuredly +persuaded, that as the beginning of their othes, preceding from ignorance +was sinne, so is the obstinate purpose to kepe the same, nothinge but plaine +rebellion against God. But of this mater in the second blast, God willing, +we shall speake more at large.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n146"></a><i><a href="#an146">[146]:</a> the fourth obiection.</i> +<p><a NAME="n147"></a><i><a href="#an147">[147]:</a> women can make no +laufull officer.</i> +<p><a NAME="n148"></a><i><a href="#an148">[148]</a>: Let England and Scotland +take hede.</i> +<p><a NAME="n149"></a><i><a href="#an149">[149]:</a> woman in authoritie +is rebel against God.</i> +<p><a NAME="n150"></a><i><a href="#an150">[150]:</a> what the nobilite +ough to do in this behalf.</i> +<p><a NAME="n151"></a><i><a href="#an151">[151]</a>: 2 Reg. II.</i> +<p><a NAME="n152"></a><i><a href="#an152">[152]</a>: Marke this fact, for +it agreeth with Goddes lawe pronounced.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>And nowe to put an end to the first blast, seing that by the ordre +of nature, by the malediction and curse pronounced against woman, by the +mouth of S. Paule the intrepreter of Goddes sentence, by the example of +that common welth, in whiche God by his word planted ordre and policie, +and finallie by the iudgement of the most godlie writers, God hath deiected +woman frome rule, dominion, empire, and authoritie aboue man. Moreouer, +seing that nether the example of Debora, nether the lawe made for the doughters +of Zalphead, nether yet the foolishe consent of an ignorant multitude, +be able to iustifie that whiche God so plainlie hath condemned: let all +men take hede what quarell and cause frome hence furthe they do defend<a NAME="an153"></a><sup><a href="#n153">[153]</a></sup>. +If God raise vp any noble harte to vendicat the libertie of his countrie, +and to suppresse the monstruous empire of women, let all suche as shal +presume to defend them in the same, moste certeinlie knowe, that in so +doing, they lift their hand against God, and that one day they shall finde +his power to fight against their foolishnes. Let not the faithfull, godlie, +and valiant hartes of Christes souldiers be vtterlie discouraged, nether +yet let the tyrannes reioise, albeit for a time they triumphe against such +asstudie to represse their tyrannie, and to remoue them from vniust authoritie. +For the causes alone, why he suffereth the souldiers to fail in batel, +whome neuerthelesse he commandeth to fight as somtimes did Israel fighting +against Beniamin. The cause of the Israelites was most iust: for it was +to punishe that horrible abomination of those sonnes of Belial<a NAME="an154"></a><sup><a href="#n154">[154]</a></sup>, +abusing the leuites wife, whome the Beniamites did defend. And they had +Goddes precept to assure them of well doing. For he did not onelie commande +them to fight, but also apointed Iuda to be their leader and capitain, +and yet fell they twise in plain batel against those most wicked adulterers.</td> + +<td><a NAME="n153"></a><i><a href="#an153"></a>[153]:<a NAME="admonition"></a><a href="#aadmon">An +admonition.</a></i> +<p><a NAME="n154"></a><i><a href="#an154">[154]</a>: Iudic. 20.</i> +<br> </td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td>The secret cause of this, I say, is knowen to God alone. Rut by his +euident scriptures we may assuredly gather<a NAME="an155"></a><sup><a href="#n155">[155]</a></sup>, +that by such means doth his wisdome somtimes, beat downe the pride of the +flesh (for the Israelites at the firste trusted in their multitude, power +and strength) and somtimes by such ouerthrowes, he will punish the offenses +of his owne children, and bring them, to the vnfeined knowledge of the +same, before he will geue them victorie against the manifest contemners, +whom he hath apointed neuerthelesse to vttermost perdition: as the end +of that batel did witnesse. For althogh with greate murther the children +of Israel did twise fall before the Beniamites, yet after they had wept +before the Lorde, after they had fasted and made sacrifice in signe of +their vnfeined repentance, they so preuailed against that proude tribe +of Beniamin<a NAME="an156"></a><sup><a href="#n156">[156]</a></sup>, that +after 25 thousande strong men of warre were killed in batel, they destroyed +man, woman, childe and beaste, as well in the fieldes, as in the cities, +whiche all were burned with fier, so that onelie of that hole tribe remained +six hundredth men, who fled to the wildernes, where they remained foure +monethes, and so were saued. The same God, who did execute this greuous +punishment, euen by the handes of those<a NAME="an157"></a><sup><a href="#n157">[157]</a></sup>, +whom he suffred twise to be ouercomen in batel, doth this day retein his +power and justice. Cursed Iesabel of England, with the pestilent and detestable +generation of papistes, make no litle bragge and boast, that they haue +triumphed not only against Wyet, but also against all such as haue entreprised +any thing against them or their procedinges. But let her and them consider, +that yet they haue not preuailed against god, his throne is more high, +then that the length of their hornes be able to reache. And let them further +consider, that in the beginning of their bloodie reigne, the haruest of +their iniquitie was not comen to full maturitie and ripenes. No, it was +so grene, so secret I meane, so couered, and so hid with hypocrisie, that +some men (euen the seruantes of God) thoght it not impossible, but that +wolues might be changed in to lambes, and also that the vipere might remoue +her natural venom. But God, who doth reuele in his time apointed the secretes +of hartes, and that will haue his iudgementes iustified euen by the verie +wicked, hath now geuen open testimonie of her and their beastlie crueltie. +For man and woman, learned and vnlearned, nobles and men of baser sorte, +aged fathers and tendre damiselles, and finailie the bones of the dead, +aswell women as men haue tasted of their tyrannie, so that now not onlie +the blood of father Latimer, of the milde man of God the bishop of Cantorburie, +of learned and discrete Ridley, of innocent ladie Iane dudley, and many +godly and worthie preachers, that can not be forgotten, such as fier hath +consumed, and the sworde of tyrannie moste vniustlie hath shed, doth call +for vengeance in the eares of the Lord God of hostes: but also the sobbes +and teares of the poore oppressed, the groninges of the angeles, the watch +men of the Lord, yea and euerie earthlie creature abused by their tyrannie +do continuallie crie and call for the hastie execution of the same. I feare +not to say, that the day of vengeance, whiche shall apprehend that horrible +monstre Iesabal of England, and suche as maintein her monstruous crueltie, +is alredie apointed in the counsel of the Eternall; and I verelie beleue +that it is so nigh, that she shall not reigne so long in tyrannie, as hitherto +she hath done, when God shall declare him selfe to be her ennemie, when +he shall poure furth contempt vpon her, according to her crueltie, and +shal kindle the hartes of such, as somtimes did fauor her with deadly hatred +against her, that they may execute his iudgementes. And therfore let such +as assist her, take hede what they do. For assuredlie her empire and reigne +is a wall without foundation<a NAME="an158"></a><sup><a href="#n158">[158]</a></sup>: +I meane the same of the authoritie of all women. It hath bene vnderpropped +this blind time that is past, with the foolishnes of people; and with the +wicked lawes of ignorant and tyrannous princes. But the fier of Goddes +worde is alredie laide to those rotten proppes (I include the Popes lawe +with the rest) and presentlie they burn, albeit we espie not the flame: +when they are consumed, (as shortlie they will be, for stuble and drie +timbre can not long indure the fier) that rotten wall, the vsurped and +vniust empire of women, shall fall by it self in despit of all man, to +the destruction of so manie, as shall labor to vphold it. And therfore +let all man be aduertised, for the trumpet hath ones blowen.</td> + +<td> +<br><a NAME="n155"></a><i><a href="#an155">[155]</a>: Why God permitteth +somtimes his owne souldiers to fail in batel.</i> +<p><a NAME="n156"></a><i><a href="#an156">[156]</a>: Iudic. 20</i> +<p><a NAME="n157"></a><i><a href="#an157">[157]</a>: NOTE.</i> +<p><a NAME="n158"></a><i><a href="#an158">[158]</a>: The authoritie of +all women, is a wall without foundation.</i></td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td> +<center>Praise God ye that feare him.</center> +</td> + +<td></td> +</tr> +</table> + +<p> +<hr width="100%"> +<p>The following postscript occurs at p. 78 of JOHN KNOX'S <i>Appellation +&c.</i>, which is dated "From Geneua. The 14 of Iuly, 1558." +<h1> +<a NAME="to the reader"></a><a href="#areader">IOHN KNOXE TO THE READER.</a></h1> +Because many are offended at the first blast of the trompett, in whiche +I affirme, that to promote a woman to beare rule, or empire aboue any realme, +nation or citie, is repugnant to nature, contumelie to God, and a thing +moste contrariouse to his reuealed and approued ordenance: and because +also, that somme hath promised (as I vnderstand) a confutation of the same, +I haue delayed the second blast, till such tyme as their reasons appere, +by the which I either may be reformed in opinion, or els shall haue further +occasion more simply and plainly to vtter my iudgement. Yet in the meane +tyme for the discharge of my conscience; and for auoyding suspition, whiche +might be ingendred by reason of my silence, I could not cease to notifie +these subsequent propositions, which by Gods grace I purpose to entreate +in the second blast promised. +<p>1 It is not birth onely nor propinquitie of blood, that maketh a kinge +lawfully to reign aboue a people professing Christe Iesus, and his eternall +veritie, but in his election must the ordenance, which God hath established, +in the election of inferiour iudges be obserued. +<p>2 No manifest idolater nor notoriouse transgressor of gods holie preceptes +o[u]ght to be promoted to any publike regiment, honour or dignitie in any +realme, prouince or citie, that hath subiected the[m] self to Christe lesus +and to his blessed Euangil. +<p>3 Neither can othe nor promesse bynd any such people to obey and maintein +tyrantes against God and against his trueth knowen. +<p>4 But if either rashely they haue promoted any manifest wicked personne, +or yet ignorantly haue chosen suche a one, as after declareth him self +vnworthie of regiment abouc the people of God (and suche be all idolaters +and cruel persecuters) moste iustely may the same men depose and punishe +him, that vnaduysedly before they did nominate, appoint and electe. +<h4> +<i>MATTH. VI</i>.</h4> +If the eye be single, the whole body shalbe clere. +<p>[Underlying these Propositions is the great truth that the Rulers exist +for the people, and not the people for the Rulers.] +<p> +<hr width="100%"> +<h1> +<a NAME="appendix"></a><a href="#aapendix">APPENDIX.</a></h1> + +<h2> +<a NAME="defence to QE"></a>J<i>OHN KNOX's apologetical Defence of his +First Blast &c. to Queen ELIZABETH</i>.</h2> + +<h4> +<a NAME="12july"></a>12 JULY 1559. JOHN KNOX to Sir WILLIAM CECIL.</h4> +The spreit of wisdom heall your hart to the glorie of God and to the comforte +of his afflicted mind. +<p>On[e] caus[e] of my present writing is ryght honorable humblie to requyr +you to Deliuer this other lettre enclosed to the quenes grace quilk conteaneht +in few and sempill wordes my confession what I think of her authoritie, +how far it is Just, and what may make it odious in goddis presence. +<p>I hear there is a confutation sett furht in prent against <i>the first +blast</i>. God graunt that the writar haue no more sought the fauours of +the world, no less the glory of God and the stable commoditie of his country +then did him who interprised in that <i>blast</i> to vt[t]er his Conscience. +When I shall haue tym[e] (which now Is Dear and straitt vnto me) to peruse +that work I will communicat[e] my Judgement with you concernying the sam[e]. +The tym[e] Is now sir that all that eyther thrust Christ Jesus to r[e]ing +in this yle, the liberties of the sam [e] to be keapt, to the inhabitantes +therof, and theire hartis to be joyned together in love vnfeaned ought +rather to study how the sam[e] may be brought to pass then vainly to trauall +for the maintenance of that wharof allready we have seen the daunger, and +felt the smart. +<p><i>State Papers, Scotland, Vol</i>. Art. 57. in Public Record office, +London. +<hr WIDTH="100%"> +<h3> +<a NAME="20july"></a>20 JULY 1559. JOHN KNOX'S <i>Declaration</i> to QUEEN +ELIZABETH.</h3> +To the verteuus and godlie ELIZABEHT by the grace of GOD quen of England +etc JOHN KNOX desireht the perpetuall Encrease of the Holie Spiritt. etc. +<p>As your graces displeasur against me most Iniustlie conceaned, hath +be[en] and is to my wretched hart a burthen grevous and almost intollerabill, +so is the testimonye of a clean conscience to me a stay and vphold that +in desperation I sink not, how vehement that ever the temptations appear, +for in GODDis presence my conscience beareht me reacord that maliciouslie +nor of purpose I inoffended your grace, nor your realme. And therfor how +so ever I be ludged by man, I am assured to be absolued by him who onlie +knoweht the secreatis of hartes. +<p>I can not Deny the Writeing of a booke against the vsurped aucthoritie +and Iniust regiment of wemen, neyther yet am I mynded to retract or to +call any principall point or proposition of the sam[e], till treuth and +veritie do farther appear, but why that eyther your grace, eyther yit ony +such as vnfeanedlie favourthe libertie of England should be offended at +the aucthor of such a work I can perceaue no iust occasion. For first my +booke tuchheht not your graces' person in especiall, neyther yit is it +preiudiciall till any libertie of the realme yf the tyme and my Writing +be indifferently considered. How could I be enemy to your graces person? +for deliuerance quhairof I did mor[e] study, and interprise farther, than +any of those that now accuse me. And as concerning your regiment how could? +or can I envy that? which most I haue thrusted and for the which (as obliuion +will suffer) I render thankis vnfeanedlie unto GOD that is, that it hath +pleased Him of His eternall goodnes to exalt your head (which tymes wes +in Daunger) to the manifestation of his glorie and extirpation of Idolatrie. +<p>And as for any offence whiche I haf committed against England eyther +in writeing that or of any other werk I will not refuse that moderate and +indifferent men Iudge and decerne betwixt me and thost that accuse me. +To witt Whither of the partijs Do most hurt the libertie of England, I +that afferme that no woman may be exalted above any realme to mak[e] the +libertie of the sam[e] thrall to a straunge, proud, and euell nation, or +thai that approve whatsoeuir pleaseth princes for the tyme. +<p>Yf I were wer[e] asweall disposed till accuse, as som of them (till +thair owne schame) haue declared thame selves I nothing dowbt but that +in few wordis I should lett ressonabill men vnderstand that som that this +Day lowlie crouche to your grace, and lauboure to make me odious in your +eyes, did in your aduersitie neyther shew thame selvis faithfull frendis +to your grace, neyther yit so loving and cairfull ouer thair native cuntry +as now thai wold be esteamed. +<p>But omitting the accusation of others for my owne purgation and for +your graces satisfaction I say. That nothyng in my booke conceaued Is, +or can be preiudiciall to your graces iust regiment prouided that ye be +not found vngrate unto GOD. Vngrate ye shalbe proued in presence of His +throne, (howsoeuir that flatterairs Iustifie your fact) yf ye transfer +the glory of that honour in which ye now stand to any other thing, then +to the dispensation of His mercy which onelye mackethe that lauthfull to +your grace Which nature and law Denyeth to all woman. Neyther wold I that +your grace should fear that this your humiliation befoir GOD should in +any case infirm or weaken your Iust and lauthfull authoritie befoir men. +Nay madam such vnfeaned confession of goddis benefittis receaued shalbe +the establishment of the sam[e] not onelye to your self, bot also to your +sead and posteritie. Whane contrariwise a prowd conceat, and eleuation +of your self shalbe the occasion that your reing shalbe vnstabill, trublesum +and schort. +<p>GOD is witness that vnfeanedlie I both love and reverence your grace, +yea I pray that your reing may be long, prosperous, and quyet. And that +for the quyetnes which CHRISTIS membris before persecuted haue receaued +vnder yow but yit yf I should flatter your grace I were no freind, but +a deceavabill trater. And therfor of conscience I am compelled to say, +that neyther the consent of peopill, the proces of tyme, nor multitude +of men, can establish a law which GOD shall approve, but whatsoeuer He +approveht (by his eternall word) that shalbe approued, and whatsoeuer he +dampneth shalbe condampneth, though all men in earth wold hasard the iustification +of the sam[e]. And therfor[e] madam the onlie way to retean and to keap +those benefittes of GOD haboundandlie powred now of laitt Dayis vpon yow, +and vpon your realme is vnfeanedlie to rendir vnto GOD, to His mercy and +vndeserued grace the [w]holl glory of this your exaltatioun, forget your +byrth and all tytill which thervpon doth hing[e], and considder deaplie +how for feir of your lyfe ye did declyne from GOD, and bow till Idolatrie. +Lett it not appear a small offence in your eyis, that ye haue declyned +from CHRIST IESUS in the Day of his battale, neyther yit wold I that ye +should esteam that mercy to be vulgar and commone which ye haue receaued. +To witt, that GOD hath covered your formar offence, hath presented yow +when ye were most unthankfull, and in the end hath exalted and raised yow +vp not onlie from the Dust, but also from the portes [<i>gates</i>] of +death to reull above his people for the confort of his kirk. It aperteaneth +to yow thairfor to ground the iustice of your aucthoritie not vpon that +law which from year to year Doth change, but vpon the eternall prouidence +of Hym who contrarfy to nature, and without your deserving hath thus exalted +your head. +<p>Yf thus in GODDis presence ye humill [<i>humble</i>] your self, as in +my hart I glorifie GOD for that rest granted to His afflicted flock within +England under yow a weak instrument, so will I with toung and pen iustifie +your aucthoritie and regiment as the HOLIE GHOST hath iustified the same +In DEBORA, that blessed mother in Israeli, but yf these premisses (as GOD +forbid) neglected, ye shall begyn to brag of your birth, and to build your +aucthoritie vpon your owne law, flatter yow who so list youre felicite +shalbe schort. Interpret my rud[e] wordis in the best part as written by +him who is no ennemye to your grace. +<p>By diuerse letters I haue required licence to vesitt your realme not +to seik my self neyther yit my owen ease, or commodite. Whiche yf ye now +refuse and. deny I must remit my [?] to GOD, adding this for conclusioun, +that commonlie it is sein that such as luf not the counsall of the faithfull +(appear it never so scharp) are compelled to follow the Deceat of flatteraris +to thair owen perdition. The mighty Spreit of the Lord IESUS move your +hart to vnderstand what is said, geve vnto yow the discretion of spirittes, +and so reull yow in all your actlonis and interprisis that in yow GOD may +be glorified, His church edified, and ye your self as a livelie member +of the sam[e] may be an exempill and mirroure of vertew and of godlie Lief +till others. +<p>So be it. Off Edinburgh the 20. Day of Julij. 1559. +<p>By your graces [w]holly to command in godlynes. +<p><i>Endorsed</i>. JOHN KNOX. +<p>To the ryght myghty ryght high and ryght excellent princesse ELZABETH +quen of England, etc. +<p>Be these Deliuered <i>State Papers, Scotland, Vol. 1 Art. 65</i>. +<p> +<hr WIDTH="100%"> +<h3> +<a NAME="20march"></a>20 MARCH 1561. THOMAS RANDOLPH to Sir WILLIAM CECIL. +[<i>From Berwick on Tweed</i>.]</h3> +Master KNOX in certayne articles geuen vnto my Lord JAMES at this tyme +hath mytigated some what the rigour of his booke, referringe myche vnto +ye tyme that the same was wrytten. +<p><i>State Papers, Scotland, Vol. 6, Art. 37</i>. +<p> +<hr WIDTH="100%"> +<h3> +<a NAME="5aug"></a>5 AUG. 1561. JOHN KNOX's second Defence to Queen ELIZABETH.</h3> +Grace from GOD the Father throught our Lord JESUS with perpetuall Encrease +of his holie spiritt. +<p>May it please your maiestie that it is heir certainlie spoken that the +Queen of Scotland [<i>MARY Queen of Scots</i>] travaleht earnestlie to +have a treatise intituled <i>the first blast of the trompett</i> confuted +by the answere of the learned in Diuerse realmes, And farther that she +lauboureht to inflambe the hartes of princes against the writar. And because +that it may appear that your maiestie hath interest, that she myndeht to +trauall with your grace, your graces counsell, and learned men for Judgement +against such a common enemy to women and to thair regiment. It were but +foolishnes to me to prescribe vnto your maiestie what is to be done in +any thing but especialie in such thinges as men suppose Do tuoch my self. +But of on[e] thing I think my self assured and therefor I Dar[e] not conceall +it. To witt that neyther Doht our soueraine so greatlie fear her owen estate +by reasson of that book, neyther yet Doth she so vnfeanedlie fauour the +tranquilitie of your maiesties reing and realme that she wo[u]lde tack +so great and earnest paines onles that her crafty counsall in so Doing +shot att a farther marck. +<p>Two yeres ago I wrote vnto your maiestie my full Declaration tuoching +that work, experience since hath schawen that I am not Desirous of Innovations +[i.e. in <i>Government</i>], so that CHRIST JESUS be not in his members +openlie troden vnder the feitt of the vngodlie. With furthie purgation +I will not trouble your maiestie for the present. Besechinge the Eternall +so to assist your Highnes in all affaires, that in his sight you may be +found acceptable, your regiment profitable to your common wealht, and your +factes [deeds] to be such that Iustlie thei may be praised of all godlie +vnto the cuming of the lord JESUS to whose mighty protection I unfeanedlie +committ your maiestie. +<p>From Edinburgh the 5 of August 1561 +<p>Your maiesties suruand to command in godlines +<p><i>Endorsed</i> JOHN KNOX. +<p>To the myghty and excellent princess ELIZABETH the Quenes maiestie of +ENGLAND be these deliuered. +<p><i>State Papers, Scotland, Vol. 6, Art 55.</i> +<p> +<hr WIDTH="100%"> +<br><a NAME="private opinion"></a>Despite this triumphant appeal to his +quiet citizenship under MARY STUART, the following description of her mother +shows that the great Scotchman never altered his private opinion on this +subject. +<p>The peace as said is contracted. The Queene Dowager past by sea to F[r]aunce +with gallies that for that purpose were prepared and tooke with her diuerse +of the nobilitie of Scotland. The Earles HUNTLY, GLENCAIRNE, MERSHELL, +CASSILLES. The Lordes MAXWELL, flying, Sir GEORGE DOWGLASSE, together with +all the kings sonnes, and diuerse Barrones, and gentlemen of Ecclesiasticall +estate: the Bishop of GALLOWAY, and manie others, with promise that they +should be rechlie rewarded for their good seruice. What they receaued we +can not tell, but few were made rich at their returning. The Dowager had +to practise somewhat with her brethren, the Duke of GWYSE and the Cardinal +of LORA[I]NE. The weight wherof the gouernour after felt: for shortlie +after his returning, was the gouernour deposed of the gouernement (Iustlie +by GOD, but most iniustlie by man) and she made regent, in the yere of +our Lord 1554. And a crowne put vpon her head, as seemelie a sight (if +men had eyes) as to put a saddle vpon the back of an vnruly cow. And so +beganne she to practise, practise vpon practise, how Fraunce might be aduanced, +hir friends made rich, and she brought to immortall glorie. For that was +her common talke, "So that I may procure the wealth and honour of my friendes, +and a good fame vnto my selfe, I regarde not what GOD doe after with me." +And in verie deede in deepe dissimulation to bring her owne purpose to +effect she passed the common sort of women, as we will after heare. But +yet GOD to whose Gospell she declared her selfe enemie, in the end [did] +frustrate her of her deuises. +<p>The Historic of the <i>Church of Scotland</i>, pp. 192-193. [Ed. 1584]. +<p> +<hr width="100%"> + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The First Blast of the Trumpet +against the monstrous regiment of Women, by John Knox + +*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK FIRST BLAST OF THE TRUMPET *** + +This file should be named 8trmp10h.htm or 8trmp10h.zip +Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks get a new NUMBER, 8trmp11h.htm +VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, 8trmp10ah.htm + +Produced by Steve Schulze, Debra Storr and PG Distributed Proofreaders. +Page scans generously made available by the CWRU Preservation Department +Digital Library. + +Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the US +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we usually do not +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +We are now trying to release all our eBooks one year in advance +of the official release dates, leaving time for better editing. +Please be encouraged to tell us about any error or corrections, +even years after the official publication date. + +Please note neither this listing nor its contents are final til +midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement. +The official release date of all Project Gutenberg eBooks is at +Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A +preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment +and editing by those who wish to do so. + +Most people start at our Web sites at: +http://gutenberg.net or +http://promo.net/pg + +These Web sites include award-winning information about Project +Gutenberg, including how to donate, how to help produce our new +eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter (free!). + + +Those of you who want to download any eBook before announcement +can get to them as follows, and just download by date. This is +also a good way to get them instantly upon announcement, as the +indexes our cataloguers produce obviously take a while after an +announcement goes out in the Project Gutenberg Newsletter. + +http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext03 or +ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/etext03 + +Or /etext02, 01, 00, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90 + +Just search by the first five letters of the filename you want, +as it appears in our Newsletters. + + +Information about Project Gutenberg (one page) + +We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The +time it takes us, a rather conservative estimate, is fifty hours +to get any eBook selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright +searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. Our +projected audience is one hundred million readers. If the value +per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2 +million dollars per hour in 2002 as we release over 100 new text +files per month: 1240 more eBooks in 2001 for a total of 4000+ +We are already on our way to trying for 2000 more eBooks in 2002 +If they reach just 1-2% of the world's population then the total +will reach over half a trillion eBooks given away by year's end. + +The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away 1 Trillion eBooks! +This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers, +which is only about 4% of the present number of computer users. + +Here is the briefest record of our progress (* means estimated): + +eBooks Year Month + + 1 1971 July + 10 1991 January + 100 1994 January + 1000 1997 August + 1500 1998 October + 2000 1999 December + 2500 2000 December + 3000 2001 November + 4000 2001 October/November + 6000 2002 December* + 9000 2003 November* +10000 2004 January* + + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been created +to secure a future for Project Gutenberg into the next millennium. + +We need your donations more than ever! + +As of February, 2002, contributions are being solicited from people +and organizations in: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut, +Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, +Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, +Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New +Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, +Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South +Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West +Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. + +We have filed in all 50 states now, but these are the only ones +that have responded. + +As the requirements for other states are met, additions to this list +will be made and fund raising will begin in the additional states. +Please feel free to ask to check the status of your state. + +In answer to various questions we have received on this: + +We are constantly working on finishing the paperwork to legally +request donations in all 50 states. If your state is not listed and +you would like to know if we have added it since the list you have, +just ask. + +While we cannot solicit donations from people in states where we are +not yet registered, we know of no prohibition against accepting +donations from donors in these states who approach us with an offer to +donate. + +International donations are accepted, but we don't know ANYTHING about +how to make them tax-deductible, or even if they CAN be made +deductible, and don't have the staff to handle it even if there are +ways. + +Donations by check or money order may be sent to: + +Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +PMB 113 +1739 University Ave. +Oxford, MS 38655-4109 + +Contact us if you want to arrange for a wire transfer or payment +method other than by check or money order. + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been approved by +the US Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3) organization with EIN +[Employee Identification Number] 64-622154. Donations are +tax-deductible to the maximum extent permitted by law. As fund-raising +requirements for other states are met, additions to this list will be +made and fund-raising will begin in the additional states. + +We need your donations more than ever! + +You can get up to date donation information online at: + +http://www.gutenberg.net/donation.html + + +*** + +If you can't reach Project Gutenberg, +you can always email directly to: + +Michael S. Hart hart@pobox.com + +Prof. Hart will answer or forward your message. + +We would prefer to send you information by email. + + +**The Legal Small Print** + + +(Three Pages) + +***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS**START*** +Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers. +They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with +your copy of this eBook, even if you got it for free from +someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our +fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement +disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how +you may distribute copies of this eBook if you want to. + +*BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS EBOOK +By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm +eBook, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept +this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive +a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this eBook by +sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person +you got it from. If you received this eBook on a physical +medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request. + +ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM EBOOKS +This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBooks, +is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor Michael S. Hart +through the Project Gutenberg Association (the "Project"). +Among other things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright +on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and +distribute it in the United States without permission and +without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth +below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this eBook +under the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark. + +Please do not use the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark to market +any commercial products without permission. + +To create these eBooks, the Project expends considerable +efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain +works. Despite these efforts, the Project's eBooks and any +medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other +things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other +intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged +disk or other eBook medium, a computer virus, or computer +codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment. + +LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES +But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below, +[1] Michael Hart and the Foundation (and any other party you may +receive this eBook from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook) disclaims +all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including +legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR +UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT, +INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE +OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE +POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES. + +If you discover a Defect in this eBook within 90 days of +receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any) +you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that +time to the person you received it from. If you received it +on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and +such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement +copy. If you received it electronically, such person may +choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to +receive it electronically. + +THIS EBOOK IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS +TO THE EBOOK OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT +LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A +PARTICULAR PURPOSE. + +Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or +the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the +above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you +may have other legal rights. + +INDEMNITY +You will indemnify and hold Michael Hart, the Foundation, +and its trustees and agents, and any volunteers associated +with the production and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm +texts harmless, from all liability, cost and expense, including +legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the +following that you do or cause: [1] distribution of this eBook, +[2] alteration, modification, or addition to the eBook, +or [3] any Defect. + +DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm" +You may distribute copies of this eBook electronically, or by +disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this +"Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg, +or: + +[1] Only give exact copies of it. Among other things, this + requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the + eBook or this "small print!" statement. You may however, + if you wish, distribute this eBook in machine readable + binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form, + including any form resulting from conversion by word + processing or hypertext software, but only so long as + *EITHER*: + + [*] The eBook, when displayed, is clearly readable, and + does *not* contain characters other than those + intended by the author of the work, although tilde + (~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may + be used to convey punctuation intended by the + author, and additional characters may be used to + indicate hypertext links; OR + + [*] The eBook may be readily converted by the reader at + no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent + form by the program that displays the eBook (as is + the case, for instance, with most word processors); + OR + + [*] You provide, or agree to also provide on request at + no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the + eBook in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC + or other equivalent proprietary form). + +[2] Honor the eBook refund and replacement provisions of this + "Small Print!" statement. + +[3] Pay a trademark license fee to the Foundation of 20% of the + gross profits you derive calculated using the method you + already use to calculate your applicable taxes. If you + don't derive profits, no royalty is due. Royalties are + payable to "Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation" + the 60 days following each date you prepare (or were + legally required to prepare) your annual (or equivalent + periodic) tax return. Please contact us beforehand to + let us know your plans and to work out the details. + +WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO? +Project Gutenberg is dedicated to increasing the number of +public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed +in machine readable form. + +The Project gratefully accepts contributions of money, time, +public domain materials, or royalty free copyright licenses. +Money should be paid to the: +"Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +If you are interested in contributing scanning equipment or +software or other items, please contact Michael Hart at: +hart@pobox.com + +[Portions of this eBook's header and trailer may be reprinted only +when distributed free of all fees. Copyright (C) 2001, 2002 by +Michael S. Hart. Project Gutenberg is a TradeMark and may not be +used in any sales of Project Gutenberg eBooks or other materials be +they hardware or software or any other related product without +express permission.] + +*END THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS*Ver.02/11/02*END* + + + +</pre> + +</body> +</html> |