diff options
| author | www-data <www-data@mail.pglaf.org> | 2026-04-15 14:48:52 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | www-data <www-data@mail.pglaf.org> | 2026-04-15 14:48:52 -0700 |
| commit | 0969933eafcab5ba675b23bb757a097e1e222ba3 (patch) | |
| tree | 0d2472c3dff1f6318599f7241ad29e1371fe8666 /78452-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '78452-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 78452-h/78452-h.htm | 19707 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 78452-h/images/cover.jpg | bin | 0 -> 231390 bytes |
2 files changed, 19707 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/78452-h/78452-h.htm b/78452-h/78452-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fb97b40 --- /dev/null +++ b/78452-h/78452-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,19707 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> +<html lang="en"> +<head> + <meta charset="UTF-8"> + <title> + Lectures on ancient ethnography and geography, volume 2 of 2 | Project Gutenberg + </title> + <link rel="icon" href="images/cover.jpg" type="image/x-cover"> + <style> + +a { + text-decoration: none; +} + +body { + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; +} + +h1,h2,h3 { + text-align: center; + clear: both; +} + +h2.nobreak { + page-break-before: avoid; +} + +hr.chap { + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + clear: both; + width: 65%; + margin-left: 17.5%; + margin-right: 17.5%; +} + +div.chapter { + page-break-before: always; +} + +ul { + list-style-type: none; +} + +li.indx { + margin-top: .5em; + padding-left: 2em; + text-indent: -2em; +} + +li.ifrst { + margin-top: 2em; + padding-left: 2em; + text-indent: -2em; +} + +li.isub1 { + padding-left: 4em; + text-indent: -2em; +} + +li.isub2 { + padding-left: 6em; + text-indent: -2em; +} + +p { + margin-top: 0.5em; + text-align: justify; + margin-bottom: 0.5em; + text-indent: 1em; +} + +table { + margin: 1em auto 1em auto; + max-width: 30em; + border-collapse: collapse; +} + +td { + padding-left: 2.25em; + padding-right: 0.25em; + vertical-align: top; + text-indent: -2em; + text-align: justify; +} + +.tdc { + text-align: center; + padding: 0.75em 0.25em 0.5em 0.25em; + text-indent: 0; +} + +.tdpg { + vertical-align: bottom; + text-align: right; + white-space: nowrap; +} + +.center { + text-align: center; + text-indent: 0; +} + +.footnotes { + margin-top: 1em; + border: dashed 1px; +} + +.footnote { + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; + font-size: 0.9em; +} + +.footnote .label { + position: absolute; + right: 84%; + text-align: right; +} + +.fnanchor { + vertical-align: super; + font-size: .8em; + text-decoration: none; +} + +.larger { + font-size: 150%; +} + +.noindent { + text-indent: 0; +} + +.pagenum { + position: absolute; + right: 4%; + font-size: smaller; + text-align: right; + font-style: normal; +} + +.smaller { + font-size: 80%; +} + +.smcap { + font-variant: small-caps; + font-style: normal; +} + +.allsmcap { + font-variant: small-caps; + font-style: normal; + text-transform: lowercase; +} + +.titlepage { + text-align: center; + margin-top: 3em; + text-indent: 0; +} + +.x-ebookmaker img { + max-width: 100%; + width: auto; + height: auto; +} + </style> + </head> +<body> +<div style='text-align:center'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 78452 ***</div> + +<p class="titlepage">LECTURES<br> +<span class="smaller">ON</span><br> +<span class="larger">ANCIENT ETHNOGRAPHY AND<br> +GEOGRAPHY.</span></p> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<p class="titlepage">LECTURES<br> +<span class="smaller">ON</span><br> +<span class="larger">ANCIENT ETHNOGRAPHY AND<br> +GEOGRAPHY,</span></p> + +<p class="titlepage"><span class="smaller">COMPRISING</span><br> +GREECE AND HER COLONIES, EPIRUS, MACEDONIA,<br> +ILLYRICUM, ITALY, GAUL, SPAIN, BRITAIN,<br> +THE NORTH OF AFRICA, ETC.</p> + +<p class="titlepage"><span class="smaller">BY</span><br> +<span class="larger">B. G. NIEBUHR.</span></p> + +<p class="titlepage"><span class="smaller">TRANSLATED FROM THE GERMAN EDITION OF DR. ISLER, BY</span><br> +DR. LEONHARD SCHMITZ, F.R.S.E.<br> +<span class="smaller">RECTOR OF THE HIGH SCHOOL OF EDINBURGH;<br> +WITH ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS FROM HIS OWN MS. NOTES.</span></p> + +<p class="titlepage"><span class="smaller">IN TWO VOLUMES.</span><br> +VOL. II.</p> + +<p class="titlepage">LONDON:<br> +WALTON AND MABERLY,<br> +<span class="smaller">UPPER GOWER STREET, AND IVY LANE, PATERNOSTER ROW.<br> +M.DCCC.LIII.</span></p> + +<p class="titlepage smaller">LONDON:<br> +PRINTED BY J. WERTHEIMER AND CO.<br> +CIRCUS PLACE, FINSBURY CIRCUS.</p> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_i">[i]</span></p> + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="CONTENTS">CONTENTS OF VOL. II.</h2> + +</div> + +<table> + <tr> + <td></td> + <td class="tdpg smaller">PAGE</td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Italy, its name</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#ITALY">1</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Population</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_3">3</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Physical character</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_10">10</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Divisions of Italy</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_13">13</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Latium</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Latium">30</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Extent of Latium</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_31">31</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Latin Colonies</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_32">32</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Jus Latii, Latinitas</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_33">33</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Different names of the Latini</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_33">33</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Physical condition of Latium</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_37">37</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td><span class="smcap">Topography of Rome</span></td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Topography_of_Rome">41</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The most ancient parts</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_41">41</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Seven Hills, Septimontium</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_42">42</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Agger of Servius Tullius</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_43">43</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Further extension</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_43">43</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Regions of Augustus</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_44">44</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Nature of the ground</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_46">46</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Cloacae</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_47">47</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Fortification of ancient towns</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_48">48</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Course of the ancient walls of Rome</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_48">48</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Marrana</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_50">50</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Suburbs</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_52">52</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Extension of the city</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_52">52</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Tombs</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_52">52</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td><i>Horti, Villae</i></td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_53">53</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Wall of Aurelian</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_57">57</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Gates</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_59">59</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Roads</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_62">62</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Interior of Rome</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_65">65</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Capitoline Hill</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_65">65</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td><i>Clivus, Semita</i></td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_65">65</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Streets of Rome</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_66">66</a><span class="pagenum" id="Page_ii">[ii]</span></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Asylum, the Tarpeian Rock</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_66">66</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Capitoline Temple</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_67">67</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Parts of ancient temples</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_67">67</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The <i>Carcer</i></td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_69">69</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Forum Romanum</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_69">69</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Comitium</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_73">73</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Rostra</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_73">73</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Curia Hostilia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_75">75</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Curia Julia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_76">76</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Buildings of the Forum Romanum</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_77">77</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Basilicae</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_79">79</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Other Fora</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_80">80</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td><i>Vicus, Pagus</i></td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_86">86</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td><i>Platea</i></td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_87">87</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Aqueducts</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_87">87</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Circi</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_88">88</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Theatres</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_90">90</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Amphitheatres</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_90">90</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Thermae</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_93">93</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Palatine</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_96">96</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Via Sacra, Velia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_98">98</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Triumphal arches</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_98">98</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Subura</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_98">98</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Carinae</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_99">99</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Quirinal</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_99">99</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Esquiline, Caelius, Aventine</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_99">99</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Suburbs</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_100">100</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Campi</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_100">100</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Moles Hadriani</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_101">101</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Trastevere</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_103">103</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Bridges</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_103">103</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Insula Tiberina</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_104">104</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The rest of Latium</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#The_rest_of_Latium">105</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Hernicans</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#The_Hernicans">116</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Volscians and Aequians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#The_Volscians_and_Aequians">119</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Campania</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Campania">127</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Sabellians, Sabines, Samnites</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#The_Sabellians_Sabines_Samnites">141</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Sabellian confederations</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_142">142</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Lucanians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_144">144</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Bruttians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_144">144</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Constitution of the Sabellians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_145">145</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Country of the Sabines proper</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_147">147</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Picenum</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Picenum">150</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Upper Confederation of the Marsians, Pelignians, + Marrucinians, and Vestinians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#The_Upper_Confederation">153</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Marsians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_156">156</a><span class="pagenum" id="Page_iii">[iii]</span></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Pelignians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_157">157</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Marrucinians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_157">157</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Vestinians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_157">157</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Samnites</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#The_Samnites">158</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Samnite Tribes</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_160">160</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Frentanians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_161">161</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Pentrians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_161">161</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Caudines</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_161">161</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Hirpinians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_161">161</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Apulia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Apulia">168</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Poediculi, Peucetii</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_175">175</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Messapia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Messapia">177</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Ancient Oenotria</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Ancient_Oenotria">179</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Lucanians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_182">182</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Bruttians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_183">183</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Greek towns on the coast of Italy</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Greek_Towns_on_the_Coast_of_Italy">185</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Magna Graecia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_188">188</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Achaean towns</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_190">190</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Locri</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_199">199</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Chalcidian towns</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_202">202</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Etruria</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Etruria">206</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Faliscans</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_229">229</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Umbria</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Umbria">231</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Gallia Cisalpina or Togata</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Gallia_Cisalpina_or_Togata">234</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Boians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_236">236</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Gallic tribes in northern Italy</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_236">236</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Gallia Cispadana, Transpadana</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_236">236</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Liguria</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Liguria">249</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Population of Italy</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_252">252</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Sicilia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Sicilia">256</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Punic towns in Sicily</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_267">267</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Egesta</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_269">269</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Towns of the interior</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_270">270</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Sardinia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Sardinia">273</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Corsica</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Corsica">278</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Hispania</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Hispania">279</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Iberians, Celts, Celtiberians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_280">280</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Baetica</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_282">282</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Turdetanians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_283">283</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Edetanians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_291">291</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Lusitanians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_297">297</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Celtici, Celtae</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_298">298</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Oretani, Carpetani, Vaccaei</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_298">298</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Celtiberians</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_299">299</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Callaici, Astures, Cantabri</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_301">301</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Iberians north of the Pyrenees</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_302">302</a><span class="pagenum" id="Page_iv">[iv]</span></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Gallia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Gallia">303</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Difference between Celts and Germans</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_305">305</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Difference between the Celts and Belgae</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_306">306</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Druids</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_308">308</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Political division</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_311">311</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Arverni, Aedui, Sequani</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_312">312</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Aquitani</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_313">313</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Armorica</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_318">318</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Belgae</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_319">319</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Treviri</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_319">319</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Germania prima, secunda</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_320">320</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Britannia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Britannia">320</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Its Population</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_321">321</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Celtic nations on the east of the Rhine</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Celtic_Nations_on_the_East_of_the_Rhine">323</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Aravisci, Boii, Norici, Vindelici</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_323">323</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Taurisci, Scordisci</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_324">324</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Galatia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_325">325</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Bastarnae, Sciri</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_325">325</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td colspan="2" class="tdc"><a href="#AFRICA">AFRICA.</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Cyrenaica</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Cyrenaica">327</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Carthaginian Republic</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Carthage">330</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Arae Philaenorum</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_330">330</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>The Syrtes</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_330">330</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Population, language</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_332">332</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Population of the interior</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_334">334</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Numidia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_339">339</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Aethiopia, Egypt</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Aethiopia_Aegyptus">340</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Meroe</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Page_341">341</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Some more Greek colonies (in Lydia and Pamphylia)</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Some_more_Greek_Colonies">347</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Cyprus</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Cyprus">348</a></td> + </tr> + <tr> + <td>Phoenicia</td> + <td class="tdpg"><a href="#Phoenicia">350</a></td> + </tr> +</table> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_1">[1]</span></p> + +<h1><span class="smaller">LECTURES<br> +<span class="smaller">ON</span></span><br> +ANCIENT ETHNOGRAPHY AND<br> +GEOGRAPHY.</h1> + +</div> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="ITALY">ITALY.</h2> + +</div> + +<p>The name <i>Italy</i> was applied at different times to a very +different extent of country. The Greeks, who scarcely +ever transferred themselves from their own point of view to +that of other nations, inform us, that the name <i>Italia</i>, beginning +in the extreme south, and belonging to a small +tract of country, became gradually extended. They relate, +that in ancient times the Oenotrians, under this name or +without any name, produced the sage Italus, who led them +from a state of perfect wildness, or from a life depending +on the chase, like that ascribed by the Romans to the +Aborigines, to agriculture and fixed habitations, and became +their lawgiver. That his laws, resembling those of +Minos, were observed for many centuries, and that at first +the name Italia was restricted to the southern half of +Bruttium, that is, the peninsula between Rhegium and the +isthmus, extending from the Scylletian to the Napetinian +gulf; that the name was then extended so as to comprise, +in about its widest sense, the country south of a line drawn +from Posidonia to Metapontum. This whole derivation from +the Oenotrian period is without any authority whatever, +though it is certain, that in the time of the Persian wars, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_2">[2]</span>and perhaps even somewhat later, that line actually formed +the boundary of Italy. Nay, that boundary, instead of +extending in the course of a whole century, even became +somewhat narrower, and the line, instead of beginning at +Posidonia, ran from the river Laos to Metapontum, along +the subsequent frontier between Lucania and Bruttium, so +that the north-western part of the country was detached +from it. This boundary afterwards remained fixed with +the Greeks; and the countries north of it were designated +by different names, of which I shall speak hereafter. But +after the middle of the fifth century of Rome, or about +twenty years after the death of Alexander, the name Italia +was extended by the Greeks as far as the Tiber. Previously +Cumae had not been in Italy, but now even Rome is spoken +of as a city of Italy.</p> + +<p>This view entertained by the Greeks, though one-sided, +is so attractive and seductive, that one easily allows one’s +self to be captivated by it, especially as we have no detailed +account of the natives of Italy to oppose to it. But amid a +countless number of particular subjects requiring critical +treatment in ancient history, people have forgotten to ask, +How did the natives come to use this name? And this +question changes our point of view. We have, indeed, no +ancient Roman monuments on this subject, but we know +for certain, that after the beginning of the seventh century, +the name Italy was applied by the Romans to the whole +peninsula, as far as Cisalpine Gaul; nay, Polybius extends +it even to the foot of the Alps. The name Italy is very +ancient, and occurs in the earliest fragments known to us; +it is manifestly of native origin, and was habitually used +by the Romans in their official language. What then were +the limits set to it by the Romans? Did they consider +themselves to be living beyond the boundaries of Italy about +the middle of the fifth century when the Greeks drew their +line of demarcation? If the Samnites and Etruscans were +beyond that line, what was the name they applied to the +whole of the peninsula? Almost all the coins discovered +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_3">[3]</span>on the frontiers of Lucania and Samnium in southern +Italy, bear the inscription <i>Viteliu</i>; and a statement in +Suetonius, a very well read scholar, in his life of Vitellius, +mentions <i>Vitellia</i> as a divinity worshipped in all Italy. +Some of the coins, moreover, have a peculiar figure, a bull +with a man’s face. The ancients lastly inform us, that +<i>vitulus</i>, in the ancient Italian language, signified both a +calf and a heifer. Accordingly, I recognise in this figure +the symbolical representation of a hero and archegetes of +the people, who was called by the Greeks Italus, and by +the Italian nations Vitellius or Vitalus, and was represented +on their coins in a hieroglyphical manner as a bull. This +figure of the bull has always been misunderstood; all +kinds of symbolical and mythological explanations have +been attempted, and a vast deal has been written about +Ammon, Bacchus, and the like. All countries derive their +names from their inhabitants; Egypt alone, which was +thus called by the Ionians from its river (the Odyssey +describes it as a διιπετὴς ποταμός), forms an exception. +This statement is certain, for <i>Aegyptus</i> was the original +name of the river Nile which is singularly remarkable, and +when swollen fills the whole country; so that both have the +same name. The name <i>Egypt</i> was foreign to the natives as +a name of their country; the name with them was <i>Chemi</i>, +whence the people ought to have been called Χημοί or Χῆμες. +With this single exception, the names of countries are derived +from their inhabitants; in Greek geography we always +have first the name of the people, and then that of the +country. So also Ἰταλοί is the original name of the people, +and from it is formed <i>Italia</i>, the country of the Itali. +These Itali comprised a number of tribes of Pelasgian origin, +which dwelt there under different names, as Oenotrians, +Peucetians, Daunians, Tyrrhenians, Latins, Liburnians, and +Siculians, extending on both coasts of the peninsula as far +as the Eridanus, though it is uncertain whether in early +times they occupied the whole peninsula as far as the +frontier of Liguria and the Po, or whether in the south +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_4">[4]</span>they possessed all the country, while in the north they +dwelt only on the coasts.</p> + +<p>If we go back to the earliest accounts, we may assert, +that the country south of a line from the coast of Etruria +and Latium, from the Liris and Vulturnus up to the ridge +which extends beyond mount Vulturnus as far as the +heights of mount Garganus, was wholly inhabited by the +Italian nation. The nation, however, was not confined +within those limits, but also inhabited Latium and Etruria, +and extended on the north of mount Garganus as far +as the river Po, under the names of Liburnians, Pelasgians, +and Siculians. This is the light in which we must +view the population of Italy in the earliest times to which +we can go back, before those nations were pressed on +by a double immigration. For as in other parts, so here +also nations were pushing onward from the north, some in +a body, and of others only particular branches. Some of +the Italian nations were expelled, and others remained in +their native places, because the conquerors were not so +savage as to be unable to live among them, and preferred +having quiet settlements to a wandering life. The nation +which gave this great impulse, and unseated (ἀνέστησαν) +others, was in all probability that of the Etruscans. Farther +east, the Illyrians spread themselves from the north, and +the Etruscans in Italy proceeded in the same direction. +The people, which, in the first instance, penetrated into the +country of the Italians, partly expelling and partly subduing +them, were the <span class="smcap">Opicans</span>. They must be conceived as +pressing onward in a broad line, commencing from the +banks of the Tiber, so that they took possession of the +country of the Aequians, Marsians, Pelignians, northern +Samnium, the district of the Frentanians, and western +Apulia. At that time they had not yet established themselves +either in Campania or in any part of Samnium. +Being pressed by the Sabines, they penetrated into the +country of the Italians, and overpowered them in all Daunia, +so that Daunia became Apulia; and then they advanced +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_5">[5]</span>into southern Samnium, Campania, and even into Latium. +Italy thus became reduced and confined within those very +boundaries mentioned in the earliest Greek traditions, +namely, a line from Posidonia to Metapontum. But the +Oscan invaders did not long retain these conquests; they +maintained one part of them, but lost another. The Sabines +were not satisfied with driving them back beyond the +ancient frontiers, but pursued them farther, and thus there +arose the <span class="smcap">Sabellian</span> nations, that is, the <i>Samnites</i> in the +widest sense of the term, the <i>Lucanians</i>, and, within their +boundaries, the <i>Bruttians</i>. The same country, therefore, +must be regarded at one period as Italian, and at another +as Oscan, and again at another as Sabellian. This is the +cause of the immense confusion.</p> + +<p>The Sabellians were not a numerous nation, and wherever +they settled, they appear to have ruled over the subject +people rather than to have changed them; the Oscans seem +to have acted differently. In the countries which adopted +the Opican name, and had formerly belonged to the Italians, +the Opican language supplanted the ancient Italian or +Siculian tongue; and when the same countries were taken +by the Sabellians, the latter were not numerous enough +again to change the language, but they themselves adopted +that of the Opicans; and hence the language of the Samnites, +Lucanians, and others, is called by the Romans Oscan. It +is an established fact, that the ground-work of this language +was essentially different from the real Sabine. The whole +of the Sabine nation stood to the people among whom they +had settled, in the same relation in which the Franks stood +to the Gauls, or the Lombards to the nations of Italy. The +Franks, for a long time, and in fact until the reign of +Charlemagne, spoke Frankish, and the name of the country +ever after was France, although the language of the people +afterwards became Roman; in like manner the Sabellians +bore this name, although their language was Oscan. This is +the only method of explaining the apparent contradictions in +many ancient accounts: the Oscans and Sabellians were +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">[6]</span>different nations, but their language was the same, the Oscan +prevailing everywhere among them. I have for many years +laboured to discover how it was possible for the language of +the Samnites to be Oscan, seeing that the two nations were +essentially, if not altogether, different. Explanations, like +that here given by means of comparison with other nations +and ages, may be applied to the history of nations as well +as to the history of constitutions and laws; a friend of mine, +a very ingenious man, has called this “the comparative +history of nations,” alluding to comparative natural history. +Voltaire says, <i>comparaison n’est pas raison</i>, but still it often +leads to the truth, though it can never supply the place of +real proof. But to return to our subject, while the Greeks +exclusively apply the name Opicans to the foreign settlers +in those parts, and call the country <i>Opica</i> or <i>Ausonia</i>, +because the people called themselves <i>Auruncans</i>, the natives +adhered to the name Italia, although the Italians had either +been expelled or were united and mingled with the conquerors. +Within this extent of Italy, then, the ruling +Sabellians adopted both for themselves and for the Oscans +the name of <span class="smcap">Italicans</span>. Thus, according to the rules of the +grammatical logic, which pervades the Latin language, we +see <i>Italia</i> derived from <i>Itali</i>, and from this again the name +<i>Italici</i>, which without any change might be given to the +Italians. Such changes of meaning, however, are of frequent +occurrence in the Latin language, for common usage +avails itself of such differences, where they exist, for the +purpose of adding some modification to the original meaning. +It is not till later times, towards the end of the seventh +century—the real line of demarcation is formed by the poets +of the Augustan age, and by the Augustan age in general—that +<i>Itali homines</i> and <i>Itali</i> are used simply to designate +Italians in general: <i>Italicum genus</i> and <i>Italici</i> were the +inhabitants of Italy within the modern kingdom of Naples, +exclusive of the Greeks. This is the meaning of the name +in Sallust, who wrote in the old Roman fashion.</p> + +<p>I have already mentioned to you that the name Italia +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_7">[7]</span>was indigenous in the peninsula, and that consequently +it was applied to a wider extent of country than was +supposed by the Greeks. I have also indicated to you the +traces of its history, though not so far back as we are inclined +to imagine them to extend. In speaking of the history of +Greece, I remarked incidentally, that some events are assigned +to dates about two centuries too early. The same is the +case in regard to the migrations and conquests of the +nations in Italy. About the middle of the fifth century of +the city, a decisive change took place in Italy, which had +been preparing ever since the time of Dionysius of Syracuse. +The Greeks were then more strictly confined to their own +territories; and the ancient Italians, who kept up an intercourse +with them or were under their dominion, lost their +assumed character of Greeks, and became subject to the +Sabellian nations, which were known to the Greeks under +the general name of Opicans. They bore this name, +because there can be no doubt, that the first who conquered +a great part of those countries, were for the most part Oscans, +who were afterwards obliged to retreat before the Sabellians.</p> + +<p>Now, as the whole of the south of Italy, as far as the +country of the Marsians, again formed an almost compact +Sabellian country (except that in the greater part of +Apulia the Sabellians had not made any conquests, but +the Opicans maintained their dominion over the ancient +Italians), and as the inhabitants of this country called +themselves Italicans, it became customary with the Greeks +also to call them Italicans, and the southern country Ausonia +or Italia—the latter in the language of ordinary life, the +former only in poetry;—but the people were rarely or +never called Ἰταλοί, nor did the earlier Greeks apply to +them the name Ἰταλικοί, but called them Ὀπικοί. This +leads me to make a philological observation. It is well +known that Juvenal uses the expression <i>opici mures</i>, which +is commonly rendered in the dictionaries by “old-fashioned,” +“rude,” “stupid,” or “barbarous;” but no further explanation +is given. The fact is this. The Greeks viewed the Opicans +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_8">[8]</span>in a very unfortunate light, as the destroyers of the prosperity +of southern Italy, and as men that served as hired +mercenaries in the southern armies (e.g. the Mamertines in +Sicily); but those who remained at home were by no +means contemptible; they appear in a very different light, +as the leading men among the Samnites, Lucanians, and +others; traits are found among them which inspire great +respect, and there are undoubted traces of their having +devoted themselves, at an early period, to the study of +Greek literature. But those of them with whom the Greeks +came most frequently in contact, were people pretty much of +the same character as the Thracians and Scythians in the +comedies of Aristophanes. The name Opicans was extended +by them in a contemptuous sense to all the Italicans, +and even to the Romans, as we see from one of the +fragments of Cato. The Greeks in general distinguished +themselves from all non-Greeks in a harsh and coarse +manner; but the designations which they applied to +foreigners differ according to the different nations with +which they came in contact. The term βάρβαροι was +originally no doubt applied only to nations of the Carian +race, Carians, Lydians, and Mysians; Ὀπικοί, in the same +sense, to the inhabitants of Italy; and Κάρβανοι in the +“Supplices” of Aeschylus apparently a Cyrenaic term, seems +to have been applied to the Egyptians and Libyans. I do not +understand Coptic, nor do I possess any books or dictionary +of that language, from which I might derive any information; +but I am almost certain that the word Κάρβανοι is +Coptic, for Aeschylus uses it in speaking of the Egyptians. +Its original meaning is unknown to me. We thus see, +how the general contrast between Greeks and foreigners +presents itself in different shades.</p> + +<p>About the time of Pyrrhus, the name Italy, in its whole +extent, was applied to the peninsula as far as the frontiers +of Etruria and the river Tiber. In this sense the name was +used by the Greeks throughout the sixth century, and +probably by the Romans also, for both strictly separate the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">[9]</span>rest of Italy from Etruria. There is a remarkable passage in +Clemens Alexandrinus, who, in his “Stromata,” says, “Italy +which borders on Etruria.” I do not quote Clemens as I +would any other ancient Alexandrian author, for he did +absolutely nothing but copy from the writers of the sixth +century, that is, from those who lived about the time of +Aristarchus; and he stops short there, because the authors +from whose works he made his compilations, belonged to +that period alone. Clemens is generally viewed in too +favourable a light; still, however, he contains abundant +materials, and no philologer ought to neglect him. When +Etruria became more and more Romanised, though there +were no Roman colonies in the interior of the country, and +when the idea of other states existing in Italy by the +side of Rome, vanished, another step was made in advance, +and the name Italy was applied to the whole peninsula as +far as the foot of the Alps; and in this sense Italy is spoken +of by Polybius. Another question cannot, perhaps, be +answered; it is this: did he include Liguria under the name +of Italy?—did he employ the term Alps in such a manner +as to comprise the Ligurian mountains between the coast of +Genoa as far as the Po?—or did he extend the boundaries of +Italy and Gaul from the Macra as far as the territory of +Modena about the Po, then continuing them south of the Po, +near Placentia and Parma, beyond the river, so as to make +them run west of the Ticinus as far as the mountains? The +last is the more probable, as it is the more natural line. +In the official language of the Romans, the Rubicon formed +the boundary of Italy, so that even Ravenna and the three +Legations, which were otherwise not Gallic, were included +in Cisalpine Gaul. Augustus was the first to add Cisalpine +Gaul to Italy, so as to make the river Varus the frontier +towards Gaul, and the town of Pola towards Istria. People +may think of Augustus as they please; I do not praise him, +nor do I blame him; his arrangements were great, and +have exercised an influence upon the history of the world; +his divisions of Rome and Italy became permanent. His +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">[10]</span>division of Italy remained in force for a period of a thousand +years, that is, down to the time of the Ottos, the Saxon +emperors; and this durability shows that the divisions were +based upon a necessary and natural foundation, whence, +with the exception of slight changes, they remained +during subsequent periods. On the side of Istria, the +boundary has become somewhat narrower, in consequence +of the change of the population, which in Istria became Slavonian. +Under the emperors after Maximinian it became +customary to call Lombardy, including Istria, Italy; what +was then the name of the southern countries, I know not; +hence the Lombard kings call themselves <i>reges Italiae</i>, +and this Italy is termed by Gregorius Turonensis <i>parva +Italia</i>.</p> + +<p>We shall use the name Italy in the sense in which it is +now generally done, excluding Savoy, which, like the +French parts of Switzerland and Belgium, belongs to +France. The country about the Adige, however, from +Roveredo as far as Botzen, ought to be regarded as part of +Italy. When you arrive there from Germany by way of +Meran, you feel that you are quite in the south, the air and +everything else reminds you of it; some of the people indeed +speak German, but they are not Germans, and their countenances +are ugly; the country, on the other hand, is very +beautiful, and in the neighbourhood of Botzen it is like a +Paradise. You feel that you are in the south and in Italy, +whereas in Savoy you are in France, for it has none of the +peculiarities of Italy. If you pay attention to everything, +the physiognomy and the dialects, you will be astonished +to find how clearly the different tribes of antiquity can still +be distinguished. My friend Arndt first directed my attention +to this. “When you go to Italy,” said he, “notice +the difference of the tribes on the borders of Tuscany.” +That was the boundary between the Etruscans and Ligurians. +I was quite surprised still to find among the Tuscans +the same fat, round faces, which are seen in ancient works +of art. The Etruscans can still be distinguished from +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">[11]</span>the Umbrians, and the latter again from the Cisalpine Gauls, +at least in masses. In Lombardy you may, notwithstanding +the strong mixture, still distinguish the dialects, and through +them the parts which were inhabited by Gauls from those +of the Veneti. It is a mistake to believe that the Italians +are very unlike their ancestors; the actual difference arises +from the strong admixture of Slavonians, and not from the +immigrations, though the Goths were very numerous; but +the Lombards were not; the former came with their women +and children, and amounted, according to Procopius, to +nearly a million of souls.</p> + +<p>The three islands which are now considered as parts of +Italy, and in which Italian is spoken, do not belong to it, +and must be treated of separately.</p> + +<p>Italy proper, as defined by Augustus, commenced at the +<i>Alpes Maritimae</i>; the Alps are then further divided into +the Cottian, Graian, Pennine, Raetian, Carnian, and Julian +Alps. I shall explain to you each of these names, so as to +enable you to find your way among, and to become familiar +with, those mountains. From the Alps, then, which form +the boundary, the <span class="smcap">Apennines</span> branch off in the north of +Piedmont in two ranges; on the one side from the two +St. Bernards near Aosta and Ivrea, and on the other from +the Maritime Alps, and the two uniting in the territory +of Montferrat run through Liguria close to the coast, +so that in many parts of the territory of Genoa roads for +vehicles along the sea have had to be made by blowing up +the rocks, and horses often still find it difficult to pass along +the sea-coast. They then turn east from the sea into +Tuscany, where the mountains, properly speaking, first +receive the name of Apennines. Afterwards they spread and +extend in a south-eastern direction towards the Adriatic; +then proceeding through the middle of the kingdom of +Naples they fill, in many, though not parallel ranges, the +whole of Lucania and Bruttium; but there the mountains +all at once disappear, though in the Abruzzi, where the +isthmus separates the southern from the northern country, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_12">[12]</span>they in some parts reach a height of 8,000 feet. For a +distance of many miles nothing but small hills are visible. +If that country were inhabited by an enterprising people, +such as the French or English, the isthmus would long since +have been broken through, for nothing would be easier than +to make a canal there and to connect the two seas.</p> + +<p>The Alps, as is well known, are primary mountains; and +their ramifications in the territory of Genoa, which proceed +from mount St. Bernard and the Maritime Alps, are of +the same character; but the Apennines assume a different +nature, and appear throughout Italy as rocks of limestone; +in the Majella they may be of a different character, for +Alpine productions are found there. In the southernmost +part of Italy, facing Sicily, another range of mountains rises +of quite a different character, being a continuation of +the Sicilian mountains, of which Aetna is the central knot. +The country near Rhegium is evidently torn off, as is +indicated even by its name.</p> + +<p>It is only the middle portion of the western coast of +Italy, about a hundred miles from Rome, that is volcanic; +the volcanic character always appears south of the Apennines, +and prevails in a portion of Latium, as is evident from the +soil and the lakes, as e.g., the Alban hills and the Alban lake; +the lake of Nemi is a crater. The territory of Campania +in its ancient sense (Terra di Lavoro) is of the same +character, but it does not extend very far into the interior, +for it is visible only in the Phlegraean plains as far as the +Liris, and in the country about the gulf of Naples as far as +the range of mountains, which terminates between Sorrento +and Amalfi; this mountain forms the southern boundary of +the volcanic ground. All the rest of Italy is essentially +non-volcanic; Lombardy contains indeed a few springs to +which one might be inclined to ascribe a volcanic origin, +but at any rate only in an improper sense; the coast of the +kingdom of Naples on the Adriatic, the whole of Apulia +and Iapygia is altogether a limestone country. This stone, +in its noblest form, as marble, appears especially in Tuscany +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_13">[13]</span>on the frontier of Liguria, where the Apennines begin to +form a distinct range; it is there that it appears most +perfectly crystallised. In the south-eastern countries, on the +other hand, it gradually changes into chalk, and forms +natural saltpetre by an <i>affinité disposée</i>.</p> + +<p>Although Italy is called a unique country, although we +think of it as the fair and charming Hesperia, and as the +country of oranges described by the poets, still it presents +the very greatest variety of climate; the differences are +as great, and perhaps even greater than in Germany. We +may divide the whole country into three natural parts; we +might perhaps make four, but there are in reality only three +great divisions. The first may be termed <i>Greek Italy</i>, comprising +very little more than the country occupied by Greek +settlements, that is, the country of the ancient Itali from the +neighbourhood of Terracina exclusive of Latium. Imagine +a line running from Terracina across the mountains, the Liris +and Vulturnus, down to Beneventum, through the valley of +the Calor as far as the Garganus: the country south of this +line is what I term Greek Italy, because its vegetation and +its climate are Greek; the difference between this part and the +countries north of it is greater than that existing between +the latter and Germany. All the plants and trees which +are seen at Rome only here and there, and are kept up with +great labour and difficulty, grow there naturally and almost +wild, as, for example, the cactus and aloe, which are really +southern plants; the pine-tree is rare, and firs scarcely occur +at all, while the dwarf-palm already grows between the +rocks. Everything not only ripens earlier, as olives and +figs, but the fruit is altogether of a different, a southern +character; the vegetation is so mighty and gigantic that we +in the north can scarcely form an idea of it. At Rome +oranges may be destroyed by frost, but in Greek Italy this +is impossible; and things which grow at Rome only in +favourable years, are there quite common. This is the case +with all plants; in short, a man there finds himself in quite +a different country. When at Rome I felt as much at home +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">[14]</span>as a foreigner who has not renounced his own country can +possibly feel, and I entered the country free from the prejudices +of a native; I visited southern Italy with the physical +feeling of a Roman (the Roman climate is still very vividly +before my mind), but I had not imagined that every thing +could be so different at Terracina. I felt the same when I +went from Germany to Italy, though it was then rather the +feeling that I was entering a foreign land. The neighbourhood +of Terracina is a particularly excellent country. All +the wines from the districts of the Liris have a Greek +character, whereas those of central Italy stand in the middle +between French and Greek wines, and are in reality bad; +the sky is of quite a different colour, and the air has something +magic and elastic, something elevating and delicious, +in comparison with which the atmosphere at Rome is heavy +and oppressive. The farther south you go, the more beautiful +everything becomes; I never was in the extreme south, +but I still hope one day to visit it. However, I have been +assured by travellers who had been there, that the charms +constantly increase, the farther south you go; you perceive +them even at Formiae, still more in the neighbourhood of +Naples, and they appear in a still higher degree at Amalfi; +in Calabria nature is said to be quite as delightful as on the +south coast of Sicily. The physiognomy and the muscles +of men also are different.</p> + +<p>The second natural division consists of <i>central Italy</i>, +which, however, has very different boundaries from those +marked in our maps. The southern frontier has already +been fixed by what I said before; but the northern runs +along the Aesis from the borders of Marca Ancona, the +ancient Picenum, across the ridge of the Apennines, so +that the sources of the Tiber still belong to central Italy; +it then passes along the Apennines on the frontiers of the +territory of Bologna to the point where the Apennines +unite with the Alps, so that even the coast of Genoa belongs +to this part of Italy. This division is likewise based +upon the vegetation. Its high mountainous parts have of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">[15]</span>course a lower temperature than the valleys, though they +are by no means thoroughly different; they belong as parts +to the whole, as every whole consists of several and diverse +parts. Their character, on the other hand, is quite different +from that of the opposite heights, which, under the same +degree of latitude, descend into Lombardy. This division, +then, with the exception of its highest mountain regions, +is the country of the olive-tree, whence the excellent olive +plantations in the territories of Lucca and Genoa, and also +in Marca Ancona. In the south-western parts of Italy, +as, for example, at Naples, the olives are not of equal +value, though they are still excellent. The race of men in +central Italy has less of the southern character; they still +share with the southern people the development of the +muscular fibres, though they have it in a less degree; but +their features are less harsh, the forms being more round +and fleshy; yet these features differ according to the different +districts and races.</p> + +<p><i>Northern Italy</i> does not at all follow the parallels of latitude; +it commences on the frontiers between the Marca +Ancona and the duchy of Urbino, and runs along the +northern slope of the Apennines up to the Alps: accordingly +it encloses the large basin of the Po, extending +beyond the Ticino and Doria, where the boundary line +rises up to the heights. This part presents a great difference +in temperature and vegetation from the southern +countries: the winters are severe, and at the foot of the +Alps hard frosts are not uncommon; the olive-tree no +longer thrives, but is more like a shrub resembling a crippled +willow, and all the southern plants which still occur in +central Italy, such as oranges and lemons, are raised only +by artificial means and with difficulty as in Germany; the +cactus, aloe, and the like, are quite out of the question. +The winters are of a northern character and commence +early; the atmosphere is heavy and unpleasant, and the +whole country has this character more or less. A person +coming from the south, e.g. from Florence or Ancona, feels +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_16">[16]</span>that he is in a northern country: in the Tyrol and in the +Raetian districts, near Trent and Botzen, the climate is far +more southerly than there, although in northern Italy the +heat in summer is very great; but the cold in winter is +equally great, and, in addition to this, the air is generally +moist and warm.</p> + +<p>These divisions are also traceable in history: northern +Italy was the country of the Gauls, and was but gradually +incorporated by the Romans with Italy. The Romans +not unjustly speak of the <i>pingue caelum</i> of those countries; +and the Milanese are to this day taunted by the southern +Italians with their <i>aër crassus</i>. For this reason the inhabitants +are on the whole ugly and awkward figures, +with the exception of those of Venice, which has a very +peculiar and beautiful race of men. The Ligurians also +are handsome, the Piedmontese are strikingly fair and almost +too delicate, while otherwise the northern Italians have +uncommonly coarse skins. The Genoese approach more +closely the peculiar Italian race, and the Milanese have +vulgar features, and no appearance of refinement and freshness. +The Piedmontese, as I have already remarked, show +a high degree of refinement, and when, in addition to this, +they are blooming, they are most handsome, especially the +women; but such a combination is rarely seen, they are +generally too fair. The Tuscans are rather a handsome race, +with round faces, and the Florentines have even something +German in their countenances. The development of the +muscles, which we find in southern and to some extent also +in central Italy, is wanting in the northern Italians. It has +for long time been a matter of doubt, as to whether the +ancients studied anatomy; but if a person carefully examines +an ordinary Italian model, he will be convinced, +that they did not require to study anatomy: the muscles +are so perfectly developed, that they can be easily and +completely distinguished on a naked arm; the whole play +of the muscles can be seen without anatomical operation. +This was probably the case to a still greater extent among +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_17">[17]</span>the Greeks, but this is not so in the bodies of northern +nations; and the muscles of a northern Italian are as much +concealed under the skin as they are in our own bodies.</p> + +<p>The dialects do not quite coincide with this division; in +the north of Italy they vary greatly, although the Genoese +and Ligurian predominate.</p> + +<p>After this account of the division of Italy into three +parts, I shall continue the description of its physical features. +I shall first speak of the Alps. To describe them is beyond +my powers; if you want to form an idea of them, you must +read the excellent description of Strabo; I have seen only +those of the Tyrol. The Alps with the ancients are much +more extensive than in our maps; not because the nations +dwelling near them applied the name to a greater range +of mountains; but they are too far distant from us, and +we, having a different mode of speaking, are not inclined +to apply the name to the same extent of mountains; the +whole range, however, forms one mass. The southernmost +Alps are those known by the name of <i>Alpes Maritimae</i>, +which afterwards formed a distinct region in the north of +Nice. This city is, properly speaking, situated beyond the +natural boundaries of Italy, but strangely enough, belongs +to Piedmont, although it is situated beyond the mountains. +It is very possible that, if Augustus had not made the Varus +the boundary, Nice would now be a town of Provence. The +Alps there rise to a mighty height, although they do not +belong to the highest; the road from Nice to Coni is a difficult +mountain road. It is not quite certain as to whether the +ancients had a clear notion of the boundary lines. The Alps, +near Briançon, are not distinguished by the ancients by a +separate name; the ancient road there ran from the Rhone to +Turin; that over Mount Cenis was not made till a later period. +These Alps are joined by the <i>Alpes Cottiae</i>, where, until +the time of Nero, there existed a small Gallic principality +under the supremacy of Rome. Next come the <i>Alpes +Graiae</i> with the two St. Bernards, the great and the little; +the latter is the mountain passed by Hannibal, according to +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_18">[18]</span>General Melville and De Luc’s incontrovertible arguments. +This fact ought to be beyond all doubt, and it is insufferable +to see the old questions on this point raised again and +again. The French army in 1800 crossed the great St. +Bernard. The <i>Alpes Graiae</i> are said to have received their +name from Hercules, who was believed to have crossed +them on his expedition into Spain: but the name must +have had a different origin. After them follow the <i>Alpes +Penninae</i>, the Simplon as far as the Furca; the <i>Alpes +Nepontiae</i>, the St. Gothard, Splügen, etc. After this the +names are obscure until we reach the <i>Alpes Raeticae</i>, which +extend in the Tyrol from Graubündten to the Puster valley. +The <i>Alpes Juliae</i>, next to these, appear under this name +without any reason being assigned for it; but it was no doubt +derived from Julius Caesar, to whose province they belonged, +but why they were named after him, is unknown. They are +also called <i>Alpes Noricae</i>; they are the Alps of Carniola, +and one branch of them extends into Istria, while another +runs round the gulf of the Adriatic into Dalmatia.</p> + +<p>The Apennines join the Alps in the country of Piedmont +south of the Po; at first their character is indefinite, but +soon their own peculiarities and a marked difference from +the Alps are developed. In ancient times they were, no doubt, +a vast woody range from one end of Italy to the other, +whereas the greater part is now barren. In the territory +of Genoa, where I have seen them, in the neighbourhood +of Florence and in the Romagna, with which I am intimately +acquainted, and in fact from the frontiers of Modena +and Lucca, they present a very sad aspect, for they are +utterly barren, and there is something wild, desolate, and +terrific about them. During summer, there is no snow on +any of those heights; in May it is often seen, though it is +but very little: still, however, the mountains are very high, +especially on the frontiers of Florence and Bologna. During +winter, storms are of very common occurrence, and no man +can find his way through them on account of the snow; the +description which Livy gives of the storms in those parts +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_19">[19]</span>is certainly not much exaggerated. I have passed those +mountains in fair weather, and when I reached the right +height, I perceived at once that I was in the region +of storms. The passage of Hannibal with his army across +that mountain during a snow-storm must certainly have +been terrible, nor can we wonder that the Goths of Radagaisus +perished there in winter: I think I have found out +the district where this happened. Towards Umbria the +mountains become considerably lower; they there form a +thoroughly beautiful country, the air on the heights is +healthy, and chesnut forests again make their appearance. +The mountains then run through Umbria in a south-eastern +direction across the country of Camarina into the Abruzzi, +and their height again increases immensely, so that perpetual +snow is said to be found on mount Majella and some others; +but this snow must be limited to the ravines. Winter there +commences very early; at Rome the top of mount Leonessa +is seen covered with snow even at the beginning of +November, and frequently continues there till April. This +is the highest ridge in Italy, and about it we have to look +for the most ancient seats of the Sabines. Thence the +mountains extend into Samnium, and one branch runs +towards mount Garganus. Farther south, the mountains +lose their excessive height, and are again, up to their top, +covered with wood, either chesnuts or other trees that are +useful to man. The mountains there are comparatively of +a moderate size, and are exposed to the full influence +of a southern climate, especially in Lucania, and in their +continuation extend into Bruttium down to the peninsula +which physically belongs to Sicily. The last extremity, +which ought no longer to be called Apennines, +for it neither belongs to them in a geological point of view, +nor do the mountains run in the same direction—I allude to +the mountain between Lucania and the isthmus—is the Sila, +the large Bruttian range of mountains covered with fir +forests, where the Romans had their large establishments for +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_20">[20]</span>the manufacture of tar, and whence they derived their +timber for ship-building.</p> + +<p>These general remarks about the mountains may suffice +for the present: I shall enter more into detail, as occasions +occur, and now pass on to the rivers.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Padus</span>, the <i>fluviorum rex Eridanus</i>, has none of the +characteristics of a southern river; it has the same natural +features as the Waal and the Leck in the Netherlands, for +it is muddy, and as it has been so long shut in between +embankments, its bed is so high, that the surface of its +waters is from fifteen to twenty feet above the level of the +surrounding country. The whole basin of the Po, and of +the rivers emptying themselves into it, was originally a vast +bay of the sea, which was gradually confined to these +rivers; it is a “river-marsh,” as the people in Dithmarsh +would say. How many thousands of years may this process +have lasted! At the time when the mouth of the Po was far +above the point where it now is, a succession of downs had +been formed from the neighbourhood of Rimini as far as +the innermost corner of the Adriatic, or as far as Aquileia +and Trieste, just as in the Kurische and Frische Nehrung +in Prussia, and as was formerly the case along the coast +from Calais to Jutland. Behind these downs there was a +vast inland lagune which became gradually filled up; in the +neighbourhood of Venice the filling up is prevented only +by artificial means. These hillocks of sand are now called +<i>lido</i>; such a one exists near Venice, and upon it depends +the safety of the city during high floods. Ravenna was in +antiquity a city like Venice, built upon islands and stakes; +but the space gained in the course of 2000 years scarcely +amounts to eight miles. All the rivers descending from +the Apennines on the south of the Po empty themselves +into it, and all those which flow from the north on the east +of the lake of Garda discharge their waters into the +lagunes: they all have their share in extending the coast. +The most important of these rivers will be mentioned, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_21">[21]</span>when I come to speak of the countries to which they +belong.</p> + +<p>In central Italy, the <span class="smcap">Tiber</span> is the king of rivers. The +orthography <i>Thybris</i> must be ancient, as it was also adopted +by the Greek writers. The Tiber is indeed the most renowned +river in the world, but it is by no means beautiful; +its waters are very muddy and rapid and of a disagreeable +appearance; navigation is difficult, and consequently not +frequent, and the country about the river is much exposed +to inundation. There can scarcely be a more unpleasing +sight than that of the Tiber at Rome. Its tributaries are the +<i>Anio</i> (now <i>Teverone</i>, even in antiquity called <i>Tiburnus</i>), the +<i>Nera</i> or <i>Nar</i> (a Sabine word signifying sulphur, which is +contained in its waters), and a number of small streams +without particular names; it also receives supplies of water +from lake Velinus.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Arno</span> is the principal river of Tuscany; it is smaller +but incomparably more beautiful than the Tiber, especially +in the neighbourhood of Florence. I think I have first +discovered its extremely remarkable history, partly by my +own observations, and partly from the excellent chronicle of +Florence. It originally consisted of three distinct rivers. +At its mouth the sea formed an estuary, and as the water of +those marshes was carried into the sea by a small river in +the neighbourhood of Pisa, the inhabitants considerably +widened it by making drains through the marshes, and +thus carrying the waters into the river. The middle part +was a large lake covering the ground now occupied by +Florence: the rock Gonfalina formed a barrier against it, +but being cut through, an outlet was formed towards the +lower Anio, as has been observed even by Villani. The +large ancient basin of this lake may still be recognised, and +the walls of Fiesole still show how high it was.⁠<a id="FNanchor_1" href="#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> The +third part, now the upper Arno, was formed in the ante-Roman +period in the neighbourhood of La’ncisa, likewise +by cutting a canal through a rock for the purpose of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_22">[22]</span>making an outlet for the water which formerly flowed +partly towards the Tiber, and partly formed another lake. +In this manner, the most excellent country, with the most +wonderful natural beauties, has been almost entirely recovered +by human ingenuity.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Liris</span>, on the frontier between central and southern +Italy, is mentioned under the name of the <i>Garigliano</i> as +early as the ninth century. It flows down from the Apennines +as a beautiful mountain-torrent in the neighbourhood +of Arpinum and Sora, but near its mouth it deserves the +name of <i>quietus amnis</i>, at least under ordinary circumstances; +for during the changes of the seasons, its current is +often very strong.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Vulturnus</span> was no doubt so called from an ancient +Oscan or Samnite word <i>vultur</i>, signifying a mountain. The +east-wind which is known at Rome under the name of +<i>Vulturnus</i>, probably also derives its name from a Samnite +mountain, for it has no reference to the river.</p> + +<p>The other rivers in the west, which discharge their +waters into the Tyrrhenian sea, are insignificant. I may, +however, mention the <i>Silarus</i>, which forms the northern, +and the <i>Laus</i>, which forms the southern boundary of +Lucania.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Aufidus</span>, now Ofanto, is the only large river in +southern Italy, which empties itself into the Adriatic; it is +still, when swollen, very rapid and raging, as it is described +by Horace. Its fall is greatest near the Apennines; it is +not a fine river, and its waters are muddy with lime.</p> + +<p>The seas surrounding Italy are: in the west, the <i>mare +inferum</i>, Τυρσηνικὴ θάλασσα, extending from the Ligurian +gulf to Sicily; it is called <i>mare Tyrrhenicum</i> or <i>Tuscum</i> +only by Roman poets and by those who affect to write +learnedly. The Romans certainly did not call the Adriatic +<i>mare Hadriaticum</i>, but <i>mare superum</i>; the Greeks sometimes +call it Ἰόνιος κόλπος. The sea in the south-east of Italy +had no special name among the Romans, but the Greeks +call it Ἰόνιος θάλασσα.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">[23]</span></p> + +<p>The bays of Tarentum and Liguria are sufficiently +described by their names.</p> + +<p>Let us now proceed to the divisions of Italy. I shall +first speak of the most ancient ones, which arose with and +through the nations themselves. They are very variable, +and I am afraid it will not be possible to make their relations +quite clear without being very minute.</p> + +<p>In the earliest times, Italy may be conceived somewhat +in the following manner: southern Italy, from the line I +have already mentioned as running from mount Garganus +across the country as far as the coast of Latium, is the +country of the Itali, who appear there as different tribes +and under different names. To the north of that line we +have the country of the Opicans, next that of the Sabellians, +and to the north of them we have the Umbrians; it +is possible, that at the same early period the Etruscans, +who had come from the north, may have dwelt there, while +the whole coast on both sides, from Pisa as far as the +Adriatic gulf, was occupied by Pelasgian tribes. This form +of Italy is the most ancient of which we have any knowledge; +we have nothing more definite during the historical +ages. In passing on to the time which we call the end of +regal power, or the beginning of the consulship, we find +in the south the Greek settlements scattered in an almost +unbroken line from Tarentum to Posidonia, in Apulia and +Calabria, while Neapolis and Cumae occur in Campania. +The Oenotrian tribes are partly allied with, and partly +dependent on, those Greek colonies. The Oscans at that +time probably extended into Calabria, and occupied Apulia, +Samnium, and Campania; the Volscians and Aequians +belonged to them. Whether these Oscan tribes were in +any way akin to the Pelasgians, is a question which it is +difficult to answer, though it is clear, that afterwards +they became mixed and amalgamated with them; for in +Latium, for example, Oscans and Pelasgians lived together. +Next to them follow the Sabellian tribes from the frontiers +of Apulia, viz., the Picentians, Pelignians, Marrucinians, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">[24]</span>Vestinians, Marsians, Frentanians, Sabines, etc., +and they extend down to Rome. The country north of +them was occupied by the Umbrians, inhabiting an extensive +territory, though they were already a declining +people, having been broken by the Etruscans. These Etruscans +were then already in full possession of the country +as far as the neighbourhood of Rome, and on the other side +they extended to the very summits of the Alps in Raetia, +and the Alpine tribes in the district of Graubündten belonged +to them: they were a great and mighty nation, +occupying the whole of the north of Italy. The north-east +was inhabited by the Veneti, and in the north-west +the Ligurians extended as far as the Ticinus. But +then the Gauls invaded Italy, crushed some of the Ligurian +tribes, overpowered and annihilated the Etruscans on the +Po, with the exception of a few places, such as Mantua and +Verona; they even advanced into Picenum, and ruled over +many tribes which were not expelled by them. All those +who were able to offer resistance remained, but all the +others were extirpated; wherever the Gauls appeared, they +changed the country which they did not occupy for themselves +into a wilderness, and forests arose where formerly +agriculture had been flourishing. Hence, when subsequently +the Romans extended their dominion in those +parts, they found the country a desert, and as such it is +described even by Polybius.</p> + +<p>I shall not here enter into a description of the condition +of Italy, which was the result of the Roman conquest, for +I should have to repeat the same afterwards in giving you +an account of the separate countries: even a general outline +would render it necessary to enter into great detail. We shall +at once pass on to the seventh century, as the period of +regular organisation, when the Sempronian laws completely +fixed the boundaries of Italy. Italy then extended as far as +Ariminum, and on the other side as far as the river Macra. +The country north of those points was in ordinary life +called <i>Gallia Cispadana</i>, but it did not form a province by +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">[25]</span>itself, in the sense of a country regularly governed by +propraetors or proconsuls. Before the time of Augustus, +and even during the first years of his reign, Gallia Transpadana +and Venetia were not included in Italy, but were +under a military administration, sometimes united with Illyricum +and sometimes with Gaul in the wider sense of the +name. Augustus first joined that country politically to Italy, +as it had long since become Latinised by the extraordinary +influx of Romans from Latium. This is quite surprising. +The use of the Latin language seems to have become +universal with extraordinary rapidity, and sometimes even +in the short space of a single generation. It is remarkable +how quickly such a change takes place, while afterwards there +occurred a stand-still, and no further extension took place. +In France the Latin language had spread so rapidly in +consequence of the Roman conquest, that, even at the time +when Pliny wrote, it generally prevailed in Provence as +far as Lyons, and the Gallic language had disappeared. +From Sulpicius Severus and the ecclesiastical fathers, we +see that in the fifth century the Romanic was the vernacular +tongue in Gaul and not Celtic. This was the case +from Provence to Armorica, and during the period of the +Frankish kings the boundaries of the Romanic language +were undoubtedly the same as they are at present, and for +centuries the language of Lower Britany has not lost a +single village. I do not mean to say, that the Celtic was +everywhere else quite extinct, but it was spoken very little, +just as in some villages of Lusatia, Wendish is spoken, of +which the inhabitants of the towns do not understand a +word. Augustus, then, extended Italy in this manner, +because the northern parts had either already become +Latinised, or showed every symptom of soon becoming +so.</p> + +<p>Augustus divided Italy into eleven regions, and afterwards, +in the third century of our era, probably under Severus, +this number was increased to fifteen. Pliny has made +the former the basis of his description, but the latter is not +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_26">[26]</span>found quite complete in any ancient author. A knowledge +of these divisions is of great importance in history, in order +to understand the notices of ancient writers, especially of +the “Scriptores Historiae Augustae.”</p> + +<p>The regions of Augustus are:—1. <i>Latium</i> and <i>Campania</i>, +from the Tiber to the Silarus, on the frontier of Lucania. +2. <i>Southern Samnium</i>, <i>Beneventum</i>, the country of the <i>Hirpini</i>, +<i>Apulia</i> and <i>Calabria</i>. 3. <i>Lucania</i> and <i>Bruttium</i>. 4. <i>Northern +Samnium</i> and the country of the <i>Marsians</i>, <i>Marrucinians</i>, +<i>Pelignians</i>, and <i>Vestinians</i>. 5. <i>Picenum.</i> 6. <i>Umbria.</i> +7. <i>Etruria</i>, a name which remained customary until the +second century; but from that time and especially during +the third century, it was always called <i>Tuscia</i>, as <i>Tusci</i> was +always the name of the inhabitants. Tuscia occurs neither +in Cicero, nor in Livy, nor in Ennius, nor in Cato. But +in the reign of Constantine no scholar ought to speak of +Etruria. These are things which serve as hints to him who +understands them to indicate the time at which anything is +written, and which are stumbling blocks to those who are +ignorant of them. When at Rome, I had made such progress +in these matters, that in looking at a ruin, I could +immediately discern to what century it belonged, and in +like manner a practised eye can, even without any statement +of time or place, discover whether coins are Thracian +or Cilician and whether they belong to the period before or +after Alexander. Historical blunders are quite as bad as +grammatical ones; they are not indeed illogical, but they +grate upon well-trained ears and feelings, and create uneasiness. +8. <i>Ariminum</i>, the legations of Urbino, Ferrara, +and Romagna. 9. <i>Liguria</i>, the country south of the river +Po, from the borders of Etruria as far as the Alps. 10. <i>Venetia</i>, +and 11. <i>Regio transpadana</i>, from the Lago di Garda +to the Alps.</p> + +<p>If we were to understand the later division into provinces +according to this scheme, we should misplace Liguria, for +example, entirely, for that country contained nothing of what +had previously been comprised under the same name. This +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_27">[27]</span>later division, as I said before, was made in the third century, +probably in the reign of Severus. Paulus Diaconus furnishes +the best ground-work of this division, although he is +very confused, not enumerating the regions in any definite +order. The fifteen regions, according to his statement, are:—1. +<i>Venetia et Histria</i>, as far as the Benacus or Lago di Garda. +2. <i>Liguria</i>, the same country which was formerly called Transpadana, +from the Lago di Garda to the foot of the Swiss Alps +near mount St. Bernard; it was, therefore, on the north of +the Po, and only a small corner of it belonged to ancient +Liguria. In this sense we find the name used in the Codex +Theodosianus and in Procopius. Two <i>limites</i> above Italy +were then regarded as parts of Italy, which in the time of +Augustus did not yet belong to it, viz., 3. <i>Raetia prima</i>, +and 4. <i>Raetia secunda</i>; but their boundaries are not mentioned +anywhere. 5. <i>Alpis Cottia</i>, or <i>Alpes Cottiae</i>, the +ancient Liguria proper as far as the frontiers of Tuscia; the +name is transferred from the Cottian Alps in the neighbourhood +of mount Cenis and Susa to the whole of ancient +Liguria. 6. <i>Tuscia et Umbria</i> (in the official style, for +otherwise people then wrote Thuscia). Thuscia is Tuscany, +and the part of Umbria, which was then called Umbria in a +narrower sense, embraced Assisi, Spello, Foligno, etc. +7. <i>Campania Aurelia.</i> Campania comprises the whole region +which Augustus called <i>Latium et Campania</i>, extending +from the Tiber to the Silarus. Hence the modern name +of <i>Campagna di Roma</i>, of which traces occur even in +the writers of the western empire, as in the expressions, +<i>Campania Romana</i>, <i>Campania Romae</i>; in Servius we read: +<i>Gabii quondam oppidum Campaniae</i>, but this passage occurs +in one of those books (from the end of the fourth to the +beginning of the twelfth), of which it can be proved, that +their present form belongs to a much later time; the substance +was composed in the fourth century, but the form +probably arose in the eighth century in the grammatical +school of Ravenna.</p> + +<p>One hundred miles around Rome, the <i>provinciae suburbicariae</i>, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_28">[28]</span>must be distinguished from Thuscia and Campania; +they did not belong to the regions, but were under the praefectus +urbi, whence <i>Thuscia suburbicaria</i>, subsequently the <i>Patrimonium +D. Petri</i>, and <i>Campania suburbicaria</i> were opposed +to <i>Campania Aurelia</i>, that is, the Campagna di Lavoro. The +name <i>Aurelia</i> has not been understood by the few scholars +who have treated of this period; and wherever the name +was found, the strangest emendations have been attempted, +because it was believed that it was not the name of a province; +but express testimony that it was a province occurs +in Boëthius and others. 8. <i>Lucania et Brittia.</i> We must +adhere to this corrupt ancient mode of spelling <i>Brittia</i>, for +so it occurs in MSS., in subscriptions, in the “Scriptores rei +Agrariae,” in the “Notitia imperii” and elsewhere.</p> + +<p>Our guide now passes on to the Alpes Penninae. Wallis +must, probably, be regarded as a region, and also Aosta and +Ivrea under the name of 9. <i>Alpes Penninae</i>; Paulus Diaconus, +however, calls them <i>Apenninae</i>, and applies the name +to some country of central Italy; but it can be proved that +such a province never existed. 10. <i>Aemilia</i>, between a +part of the Alpes Cottiae and Liguria, from Piacenza to +Bologna. 11. <i>Flaminia</i>, that is, Romagna, Ferrara, Pesaro, +or the maritime district as far as the Marca Ancona. 12. +<i>Picenus</i> (masculine, supply <i>ager</i>), the Marca Ancona with +some adjoining Sabellian districts. 13. <i>Valeria</i>, extending +from Tibur over the country of the Marsians, Pelignians, +and perhaps, also, the Marrucinians; this province is +sometimes politically united with Picenus, for Alba, the +capital of Valeria, is also called, in the imperial rescripts, +<i>Alba in Piceno</i>. 14. <i>Samnium</i>, and 15. <i>Apulia et Calabria</i>. +Then come the islands Sicily, Sardinia, and Corsica.</p> + +<p>These provinces must be remembered in order to understand +the history; if a person does not know them, he +cannot understand the new and differently used names in +Procopius and others. The names Aemilia, Valeria, Flaminia, +and Aurelia, were taken from the roads which bore +them; Flaminia is the district which Augustus had left +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_29">[29]</span>without a name, perhaps the <i>regio Ariminensis</i>. The Via +Flaminia ran from Rome to Ariminum, and was thence +continued under the same name; and Scaurus afterwards +continued it as far as Piacenza under the name Aemilia. +The Via Valeria led into the interior; its originator is +unknown, but it was perhaps Messalla, for in the elegy of +Tibullus on him, he is praised for having made roads; +earlier writers do not mention this road. Connected with +this subject is one of the most pleasing recollections of my +life: I had just been reading that elegy, when I was +informed that a cross-road had been discovered, unquestionably +the same which is described by Tibullus; the part of +it which is laid open is preserved as beautifully, as if it had +been completed only this year. It is a road running through +the midst of Tivoli, and its pavement is so perfectly preserved +that the stones have scarcely removed the breadth of +a knife’s back from one another; the Romans built for +eternity, and succeeded where the destructive hands of barbarians +did not interfere. The Aurelia must likewise have +been a road, though not a very ancient one, but probably +made by M. Aurelius, or else the name of the Via Domitiana +was changed, in order to obliterate the hateful recollection. +Domitian raised splendid structures, but the hatred with +which he was looked upon, transferred many of them to +others, as his Forum was transferred to Nerva.</p> + +<p>If we arrange the before-mentioned fifteen provinces, we +first have, in the north of the territory of Rome, <i>Thuscia</i>, +in the south <i>Aurelia</i>, and between them <i>Valeria</i>: on the +other side, beginning in the south, we have <i>Lucania et +Brittia</i>, <i>Samnium</i>, <i>Picenus</i>, and behind Samnium <i>Apulia et +Calabria</i>; in the north, <i>Flaminia</i>, <i>Aemilia</i>; then from the +sea-coast the <i>Alpis Cottia</i>, including Genoa and Piedmont, +<i>Liguria</i>, <i>Alpes Penninae</i>, <i>Venetia et Istria</i>, and beyond Italy +the two <i>Raetiae</i>.</p> + +<p>The Codex Theodosianus contains an expression which is +so peculiar, that even the great Jacobus Gothofredus mistook +it; we there read that some laws were promulgated +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">[30]</span><i>per Italiam et Alpes</i>. <i>Italia</i> here does not denote the whole +peninsula, but only Lombardy, while <i>Alpes</i> signifies the +Cottian and Pennine Alps and the two Raetiae.</p> + +<p>We shall now take up Italy according to its various +countries, beginning with</p> + +<h3 id="Latium"><span class="smcap">Latium</span>,</h3> + +<p class="noindent">the heart of Italy. I do not mean to say that Samnium +might not equally well have become the heart of the +country, but history has willed it otherwise. Latium +is by its situation destined to exercise the sovereignty, +while that of Samnium is less favourable in this respect. +The name Latium was not always applied to the same +extent of country; the Greek name is ἡ Λατίνη, whereas +τό Λάτιον is a later form copied from the Latin, and properly +signifies <i>jus Latii</i>, in which sense it is used, for +example, by Appian, who was a jurist. Latium received +its name from the people of the Lati or Latini; but in what +sense the name was given to the people, remains at least a +controverted question.</p> + +<p>I cannot, in these Lectures, always attempt to prove to +you the correctness of my views, and I have done so only +in a few instances; but where, owing to the multiplicity of +the traditions, no definite conclusion has been come to, or +where I have not been able to arrive at a settled conviction, +I state to you what can be said for and against it. What I +am now going to state is my well-weighed conviction, and +not the result of an inquiry made to-day or yesterday. I +commenced studying the subject at a very early age, about +thirty-five years ago; afterwards I put it on one side for many +years, because I was engaged in others, and those the most +practical occupations, in financial, commercial, and exchange +matters,—years which I do not regret, for I think that in +them I did some service to my contemporaries. But I +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_31">[31]</span>never lost sight of my favourite inquiries, for I cherished +them in my walks, in my travels, nay, in the midst of the +confusion of war. One of the most important inquiries, viz., +that about the Slavonians and Sarmatians, I made in the +interior of Russia, when I had no books with me except a +Latin translation of Strabo. With this conviction I will at +once lay before you the results of my investigations; it +would take several years, if I were to attempt to refute the +opinions of others: I shall give you that which I honestly +hold to be true and correct.</p> + +<p>The extent of Latium was different at different times. +In the earliest ages, it cannot have been confined between +the Tiber and the Liris, but must have extended far beyond +the Liris, perhaps as far as Cumae and the frontiers of Italia +in its narrowest sense. Such it appears in the treaty between +Rome and Carthage; this is evident from the words +in Polybius, where it is stipulated, that the Carthaginians +should make no conquests on the coast from Ostia to Terracina, +which was subject to the Romans. Latium therefore +must have extended farther south; I will not absolutely +assert, that in the north also it extended beyond the Tiber. +As afterwards the whole of the sea coast was taken possession +of by the Volscians, the coast for a time did not belong to +Latium, and even Antium must have been separated from +it. But Latium, in a narrower sense, is the country of the +thirty allied towns forming the Latin state during the first +period of the Roman republic, when the sea coast was +separated from it. This continued to be the extent of +Latium until the end of the fourth century of the city, +when the maritime towns again united with Latium and +formed the great Latin league, which I have described in +the first edition of my history, and which, as I have only +now discovered, was formed in the year 397. Latium then +extended as far as the Liris, but not beyond it, for in +the south of this river we find Campania, which during +the earliest times is never mentioned. During this period +therefore, the Volscians and Auruncans on the coast are +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">[32]</span>likewise called Latins. This meaning of the name afterwards +changed again, and only a portion of that country +together with all the Latin colonies was termed <i>nomen +Latinum</i>, that is <i>gens Latina</i>, or <i>genus Latinum</i>, just as we +have <i>nomen Romanum</i>, <i>nomen Fabium</i> in Livy. The Latin +colonies consisted of Romans, Latins, and Italicans; they +became a single nation, which the Romans planted all over +Italy, and they rose to such importance as almost to throw +the ancient Latin towns into oblivion, so that at the time +of the Hannibalian war the name Latini signified the Latin +colonies and the few Latin towns which had belonged to +the ancient confederacy and had not yet obtained the +Roman franchise. Their number continued to increase +until the lex Julia, which conferred the Roman franchise +upon all of them; Tibur and Praeneste also, the only remaining +towns of the old Latin confederacy, now received +the franchise, and for the moment the Latini ceased to +exist. However, at Rome any gaps which arose, were +immediately filled up; when one generation became effete, +another of new and vigorous citizens was established in its +place. C. Pompeius Strabo afterwards conferred the <i>jus +Latii</i> upon the towns of Gallia Transpadana, and with this +wise and progressive measure introduced something quite +different from what had been customary before. These new +Latins were levied for the Roman legions, whereas the +earlier ones had formed cohorts of their own; the latter had +been in the relation of isopolity, and by virtue of the <i>jus +municipii</i> they might take the Roman franchise whenever +they pleased; but the new Latins in Gallia Transpadana +could do this only when they had held a municipal office +in any of their own towns. They, moreover, had no <i>connubium</i>: +when a Roman married such a Latin woman, his +children were not Roman citizens. Sigonius is intolerable +on this subject, and so also most of the moderns. It is sad +that our jurists are not better philologers; I think that in +questions of this kind an intimate acquaintance with the +ancient authors is indispensable. But on the other hand, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">[33]</span>philologers ought to possess a very accurate knowledge of +Roman law.</p> + +<p>This creation of Pompeius Strabo naturally produced two +off-shoots. In the first place, some people <i>extra Italiam positi</i> +now likewise obtained the <i>jus Latii</i>, especially certain Spanish +tribes and the inhabitants of Provence, and all of them on +the same footing as the Galli Transpadani. You ought to +know these rights of the Transpadani, because they belong +to the age of Cicero and Caesar, and are of interest in the +history of that period. Secondly, in the reign of Tiberius +there was passed the <i>Lex Junia Norbani</i>⁠<a id="FNanchor_2" href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a>⁠, which limited the +manumission of slaves, and provided regulations to effect +a state of security for freedmen without their obtaining the +franchise. This is the later <i>Latinitas</i>, mentioned in the law-books. +The <i>lex Aelia Sentia</i> had already established similar +limitations, to prevent slaves from becoming Roman citizens +by manumission; but these restrictions consisted in the formalities +of the law, which had grown obsolete, and were, in +many instances, troublesome and even injurious. The law +had thus become unsettled. Formerly the earlier Latins +were not distinguished from the later ones; but the ancient +Latins had the <i>connubium</i>; all the Italians, in fact, had it, +and most certainly the Latins.</p> + +<p>Being a part of larger nations, the Latins bore the names of +these nations; hence they were called Tyrrhenians by Greek +authors; but even their own names had different forms, for +they are called <i>Lavini</i> and no doubt also <i>Lacini</i>. The +ancient national name Lavini gave rise to the story that +Latinus had a brother Lavinus, and that the latter gave the +name to the town of Lavinium—a statement which was +adopted by those who would not derive the name of the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">[34]</span>town from Lavinia. This view of the matter at once +explains that which puzzled the grammarians, and which +our wretched epitomes of the commentaries on the Aeneid +cannot solve. Namely, Virgil often speaks of <i>litora Lavina</i> +and <i>arva Lavinia</i> before the arrival of Aeneas in Italy, +because he entertained the notion that the name <i>Latini</i> arose +afterwards from the union of the Trojans and Aborigines; +hence he took the poetical form <i>Lavinus</i>. In like manner, +Virgil, in his catalogue, at the end of the seventh book, +when speaking of the tribes of Latium, says <i>picti scuta +Lavici</i>, which has always been referred to the town of +Lavici in Latium, which was called after its inhabitants; +but we cannot take this as the name of a town, as both +before and after tribes only are mentioned, and <i>Lavici</i> there +is nothing else than Latini. There can be no doubt that +they were also called <i>Lacini</i>. King Latinus is in some +traditions called Lacinus, and under this name he was +transferred to southern Italy. This is one of the points +which are not sufficiently attended to in the grammatical +study of the Latin language. It is indeed very difficult to +speak of these matters, as we have so few authentic remains +of the ancient Latin dialects, and even the very name “Latin +dialects” sounds strange to us, for they are mentioned only +by the most ancient among the Latin grammarians. We +find it stated, for example, that the Praenestines had a +peculiar pronunciation. There can be no doubt that the +Latins had their different dialects, though the differences +were not so strongly marked as in Greek. The Oscan +and several dialects to which the Oscan approached +more or less, were kindred languages of the Latin. I hope +that more light may be thrown upon this subject, especially +by means of inscriptions; several have already been +discovered, which I have succeeded in explaining; some exist +at Pompeii and Herculaneum, and still more will no doubt +be discovered. The Oscan is a language which stands to +the Latin in nearly the same relation as that in which +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">[35]</span>the Cretan (which we know, e.g., from inscriptions of +Hierapytna) stands to the Ionic dialect.</p> + +<p>Besides these names of the Latins, I will mention a few +others, and first that of <i>Aborigines</i>. It is inconceivable that +this name should ever have been borne by the Latin nation +itself, for it is nothing else but the designation of a primitive +people. The ancients generally explain it to mean a nation +from which others are descended; but this etymology can +scarcely be correct, it is probably synonymous with the +Greek αὐτόχθονες, for under this name and in this sense +they are actually mentioned in Roman traditions. We +must bear in mind that all traditions agree in representing +the Latins as a mixed race: in the Trojan legends they +consist of Trojans and Aborigines, that is, strangers who +arrived by sea, and natives. But these legends do not +belong to the history of nations; they are mere fictions, +which arose out of the Tyrrhenian origin of the Latins. +According to the other legend, which has more of the +character of an historical tradition, the Latin nation arose +out of an immigrating people, which, descending from +the mountains, subdued the <i>Siculi</i> (only a dialectic variety +of <i>Itali</i>), the ancient inhabitants who extended into the +interior as far as Tibur. This immigrating people had no +name, or we must suppose that its name or names have +disappeared from the traditions. But they were called +<i>Casci</i> (which, according to Saufeius in Servius, was the +name of the Aborigines) or <i>Prisci</i>. In a later and more +detailed account of the history, this relation is completely +reversed, the immigrating mountaineers being called Aborigines. +This is evidently wrong, for those are not autochthons +who subdue others, but those who are subdued: +thus the natives of Attica are called autochthons by the +conquering Ionians. The name <i>Prisci</i> is an original national +name, though it is not mentioned by the ancients: <i>Priscus</i>, +like <i>Cascus</i>, became a common appellative in the sense +of “old” in the same way as we call a thing Gothic +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">[36]</span>or Old-Frankish; but this is only a later meaning. The +name by which the Latins are mentioned in the early +history of Rome and in the formulae of the pontifical +books, is <i>Prisci Latini</i>. This has been translated “the +ancient Latins” as opposed to the <i>colonarii Latini</i>; but this +is quite impossible, for they bore that name at a time when +no Latin colonies were in existence. <i>Prisci Latini</i> is a +combination of two national names just like <i>populus Romanus +Quirites</i>, <i>Patres Conscripti</i>, and the legal expressions <i>empti +venditi</i>, <i>locati conducti</i>, and signifies “the nation of the +Prisci and Latini.” Two words denoting either closely +allied, or totally opposed objects, the two extremes or poles +of one idea, are put in juxtaposition without any connecting +link; this was the practice wherever one whole was to be +expressed by two terms. In this respect also much is still +to be done for Latin grammar; some things have been +treated of with great diffuseness, which might be settled in +a few words, while others have been completely neglected. +Even in declension entire forms have been misunderstood, +but it is especially in regard to syntax that very much +remains to be done. The ancient mode of speaking occurs +now and then, and is either overlooked altogether or treated +as exceptional; but it ought to be treated with the same +accuracy as, for example, the epic dialect in Greek. In our +case, e.g., the grammatical observation throws light upon +history; the Prisci Latini are the people of the thirty towns, +consisting of Priscans and Latins. The Priscans are the +Oscan conquerors, and the Latins the inhabitants of the +coast, or the ancient Tyrrhenian population. As in +the genealogies of the Greeks, the Pelasgian race is not +separated, whence the heroes of the Trojan time frequently +belong to the Pelasgian genealogies, so the heroes of the +Oscans also occur among the Latins, and vice versa. Hesiod, +in the well-known passage, mentions Latinus, the son of +Circe and Odysseus, as ruler of all the Tyrrhenians (Πᾶσι +Τυρσηνοῖσιν ἀγακλειτοῖσιν ἀνάσσων), understanding by +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_37">[37]</span>Tyrrhenians the people dwelling on the coasts, in the wide +extent of ἡ Λατίνη.</p> + +<p>These are the results of my investigations about the +Latins. They are spoken of in two senses: in the most +ancient, they comprise all the Siculians or Tyrrhenians on +the western coast of Italy; in a narrower and later sense, +the Latins are a mixed people of Siculians and the Oscans +who had come down from the mountains. The great mass +of the real Latins became so amalgamated with the conquerors, +that the main body remained essentially Pelasgian; +the alleged emigration⁠<a id="FNanchor_3" href="#Footnote_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> either does not refer to the Latins +at all, or only to a small portion of them; they remained +after the foreign conquest in such numbers, that their race +did not undergo any change, in the same manner as the +Italians, after the Lombard conquest, remained essentially +Italians, although the Lombards, who had come with their +women and children were the rulers. Even a small people +may preserve its peculiar language for a long time; the +Franks perhaps had scarcely twenty thousand soldiers. +Sismondi, whose judgment is otherwise in most matters of +little weight, here observes quite correctly, that in the +tenth century, the Dukes of Beneventum still had Lombard +names; thus one is called Store Seitz, “preparing seats;”⁠<a id="FNanchor_4" href="#Footnote_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> +and this was four centuries after the immigration of the +Lombards. In like manner, the nobles in Livonia speak +Lettish, but among themselves they speak German with +a peculiar pronunciation; several of them live on their +estates, speak German and have German chaplains, being, +among thousands of Livonians, the only Germans. And +yet more than five centuries have already elapsed since they +settled there.</p> + +<p>In describing the physical condition of Latium, I shall +use the name in the sense in which we find it, for example, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">[38]</span>in Pliny, where it signifies the country between the Tiber, +the Liris, and the Anio, though on the side of the Anio the +frontier must not be taken too strictly. In our maps the +boundary line is marked along the Anio; but this is incorrect, +for not only Tibur is situated on its right bank, +but also Nomentum, Corniculum, and other places. Latium, +in a physical point of view, consists of three distinct parts. +The first is of a volcanic nature, and its central point is the +Mons Albanus (Monte Cavo), with which are connected the +hills of Tusculum. This volcanic part extends from the +Campagna di Roma as far as Velitrae, so that the country, +as it approaches the Tiber and the sea, terminates in low +hills and almost forms a plain. This part is at present +called the Latin Hills (Monti Latini); the ancients have no +corresponding name for it, though it is quite isolated. The +second part is on the east of the first, and consists of a continuation +of the Apennines, which runs across the Anio as +far as the Liris; in front of it are the hills of the Hernicans, +which are likewise essentially a part of the Apennines, for +they consist of limestone and have no traces of a volcanic +nature; they extend as far as the borders of the Pontine +marshes. Between them and the neighbourhood of Tivoli, +the country is low, and in some parts a perfect plain, as in +the district where Gabii was situated; but although the +country is level, it still shows traces of volcanic agency. +This is the country of the Hernicans, with lofty Praeneste +and the Latin colonies on the border of the Pontine +marshes; further on, as far as the hills, the country contained +the Aequian and Volscian towns. Those hills are +extremely beautiful, and the high country of mount Algidus +lies between them and the volcanic plain of Campania; the +district of mount Algidus forms the watershed, the waters +on the one side flowing towards the Liris, and on the +other towards the Anio and the sea through the Pontine +marshes. On the north-east of Velitrae there is a table-land +with broken ground. The third part, or the country +in the north-west, the west, and south, is of quite a different +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_39">[39]</span>character, consisting of loose, volcanic ground, puzzolano +and tufo, which are products of volcanic eruptions. The +Tiber in the neighbourhood of Rome was once an arm of +the sea, as is clear from the undoubted investigations of +Brocchi, and pure marine sand is found there; but in whatever +part of the country a mineral occurs, it always consists +of an immense quantity of puzzolano, which in some +parts has become tufo. Such is the nature of all the country +round Rome, but strange to say, one part of the Aventine +contains a vein of limestone. Towards the sea the nature of +the country is, I believe, the same. On the coast, the land +sinks down and becomes a plain of sand as in many barren +districts of Germany, whence the coast is covered with firs, +and was called <i>ager macerrimus</i> by Fabius Maximus.⁠<a id="FNanchor_5" href="#Footnote_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> South +of Ostia the coast gradually rises and becomes a down connecting +Latium with cape Circaeum, the high promontory +of Circe. This hill belongs to the Apennines, and it is impossible +to say how it may have become attached to Latium; +it must, however, originally have been separated from it by +an inland sea. Into this sea behind the downs, the river +Ufens and several others poured their waters from the hills; +and the mud carried down by them has formed the Pontine +marshes, the nature of which was distinctly recognised even +by the ancients as a πρόσχωσις, that is, a filling up of a +place which was once a part of the sea, but they were +mistaken as to the period when this happened. Lessing +justly observes that many an error consists in merely mistaking +the time; I know from my own experience, that +even when you entertain a sound and correct view of a thing, +you may often err in regard to time: you are anxious at +once to fix the time, and commit a blunder. Such is the +case also in ancient history. Pliny is one of those men who, +by immense industry, have made themselves dull; he is +originally not deficient in intelligence and judgment. Many +people carry reading and writing to excess; Heyne, for +example, would have become a good philologer, had he not +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_40">[40]</span>undertaken too much, and had he not thereby been obliged +to cut many a knotty point instead of solving it. It is possible, +therefore, that his name will not be remembered by +posterity. In some chapters Pliny does not show his usual +manner; many things are treated of with a real love of his +subject and with great success, and his history may even +have been beautiful and genial. But he thought he was +able to produce a work, the extent of which, as he fixed it +in his own mind, was beyond the grasp of man, unless he +had given up everything else in order to be able to complete +it. He dictated, and had a person to read to him +even when he was taking his bath or his meals, and by this +means all kinds of materials were accumulated without +discrimination. It is possible that he may have passed the +Pontine marshes a hundred times; but Mucianus had recorded +the erroneous opinion, that at one time twenty-three +towns had existed there, and Pliny copied it; he states +however, in the same breath, that a lake had covered the +same country as late as the time of Theophrastus. The +latter indeed speaks of islands, but had not seen them himself. +The marshes can never have been a high country in +which towns existed. The high-road of Trajan was several +feet below the present level of the marsh, and it is still constantly +rising. The downs continue, but between Terracina +and Circeii they leave an opening for the Ufens and other +waters so far as they flow out of the marshes.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_41">[41]</span></p> + +<h3 id="Topography_of_Rome"><span class="smcap">Topography of Rome.</span></h3> + +<p>I shall now at once proceed to say something about the +topography of Rome; whether I shall be able afterwards to +treat of this subject more in detail, depends upon circumstances; +but for the present I will give you a general +outline. It is a pity that without drawings it is almost +impossible to form a clear idea. This is not the place for +speaking about the origin of Rome, but I shall not abstain +from noticing the most ancient divisions, and briefly to +state their origin.</p> + +<p>In very remote times, there existed, according to the +most credible accounts, a small town on the Palatine hill; +this town was probably called <i>Roma</i>, and its name was +afterwards extended so as to embrace other neighbouring +places. Another town existed on the Tarpeian hill opposite, +occupying at the same time a portion of the Quirinal +(not the whole of it); and I am convinced that I have +discovered its name, which was undoubtedly <i>Quirium</i>. +There are ancient statements that many small towns existed +on the summits of the hills in that district—they +may, in fact, have been no more than villages. One of +these places was situated on mount Caelius, and undoubtedly +bore the name of <i>Lucerum</i>. These three towns afterwards +grew together, and extended south of the Palatine beyond +the great chasm of the Circus as far as the higher and more +important hill called the Aventine. This hill also contained a +town, which at first, unless it was in friendly alliance, might +become dangerous to the city; but when a portion of the +Latins was admitted to the Roman franchise, they received +settlements there, and in this manner that place likewise +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_42">[42]</span>became united with Rome. The Aventine being, as it were, +an outpost, was connected with the city by means of a rampart +extending to mount Caelius. These five hills, then, the +Palatine, Quirinal, Capitoline, Caelius, and Aventine, +formed together one whole, but each had separate rights, +just as in Great Britain at the time when England and +Scotland were united, and Ireland had its own parliament +under British supremacy. A union existed between Roma +and Quirium, while Lucerum, like Ireland, was dependent, +though it had its own government; and the town on the +Aventine stood in the relation of the English colonies. +From the Caelian hill to the foot of the Quirinal another +great fortification consisting of a mound and a ditch was +formed, whereby the whole became united as one city; the +Esquiline and Viminal were drawn into the city at a later +period.</p> + +<p>In ancient ethnography and history there occur numbers, +which, in a surprising manner, recur at the most different +periods; they are by no means fanciful; to regard them as +something mystical, is itself a strange fancy, though there +have been men of great intelligence, who have not been +able to resist this notion. The number seven which so +often meets us in Roman history, is something peculiar which +has taken deep root there. There are unmistakeable traces +that, previous to the complete union between the Romans +and Quirites, Roma on the Palatine, Lucerum on the +Caelius, and the town on the Aventine, together with their +suburbs, formed one community, which was divided into +seven districts, and bore the name of <i>Septimontium</i>. These +seven hills were afterwards transferred to the whole of the +city of Rome. Every one knows the passage in Virgil, +<i>Septemque una sibi muro circumdedit arces</i>; but these +are in part quite different hills from those originally +comprised under the name Septimontium, which did not +even consist of seven distinct hills.⁠<a id="FNanchor_6" href="#Footnote_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> They then were, the +Palatine, Capitoline (formerly called Tarpeius), Quirinal, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_43">[43]</span>Viminal, Esquiline, Caelius, and Aventine. In this sense, +and when all were enclosed by one wall, the Aventine also +is reckoned as one of the seven hills, though otherwise it is +not always regarded as a part of the city. In order not to +go beyond the number seven, two very distinct hills, the +Cispius and Oppius, were treated as one under the name +Esquiline; the Aventine, at least in the opinion of the +Romans, was the highest and most considerable of all; in +order, therefore, not to leave it out, the two mentioned +before were united into one. They can still be clearly distinguished, +however much the forms of the hills have +otherwise become obscured by ruins and rubbish: even the +most indifferent observer will recognise them as two hills.</p> + +<p>Within this circumference, Rome was contained after the +<i>agger</i> of Servius Tullius was completed. This agger was +an enormous work: it ran, almost an Italian mile, from the +Colline to the Esquiline gate, and was a moat of one hundred +feet in breadth and thirty in depth, the earth of which +was thrown up as a mound lined with a wall and fortified +with towers. In the time of Augustus this work was not +only still discernible, but was used as a promenade, a kind +of boulevard, of which Horace says, <i>aggere in aprico spatiari</i>; +it continued to be admired even in Pliny’s time, while +the other walls were already destroyed. At present only +few traces of it are visible; but I have no doubt that by +excavations the lining wall might still be discovered. In +some parts, the agger is still discernible as a continuous hill. +Through this agger, then, the whole city became one united +place. Although the city became greatly extended, by incorporating +with itself suburbs and other hills, yet the additional +hills were not counted, and Rome remained the city +of the seven hills. One of the additions which the city +received, was that of the <i>mons Pincius</i> or <i>Hortulorum</i>, on +the other side of a wide valley, by which it was separated +from the Quirinal: it derived its name from the palace of +the Pincii, of which the ruins were to be seen as late as the +sixteenth century; it is also remarkable as the place where +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_44">[44]</span>Belisarius in the sixth century had his head-quarters. Near +the Aventine, another hill was added, to which the ancients +do not give a distinct name, but which, during the middle +ages, was strangely called <i>Asbestus</i>, which is perhaps a +corruption of an ancient name. If it be not a mere invention, +it is probable that a church may have stood there +which was called <i>in Asbesto</i>. Nibby was the first to notice +this, at least he first published it.⁠<a id="FNanchor_7" href="#Footnote_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a> The suburb beyond the +bridge (<i>trans Tiberim</i>, <i>Trastevere</i>) also was added, and in +like manner the <i>Janiculus</i> became a part of the city, as +well as another small hill in the neighbourhood of the +second Aventine, the greater part of which, however, was +outside the city. The number of hills which were regarded +as belonging to the circumference of the city, thus already +amounted to ten. In the ninth century, when the Borgo +was built and St. Peter was fortified, the Vatican hill also +was incorporated, so that at present the number of hills +belonging to the city amounts to eleven. A great part of +them, however, is now uninhabited, being covered by +vineyards. But the division into seven parts had taken +such firm root, that Augustus, in dividing the city into +regions for the purpose of regulating the administration of +the police, made fourteen regions; and this was wise +and not a pedantic going back to obsolete institutions. +This arrangement of Augustus was very necessary, for +Rome was at that time little better than a den of robbers, +as is usually the case in republics when the free constitution +is not kept fresh and adapted to circumstances, when +they become too vast, when morality decays, and when +there arises a contradiction between the social condition +of the nation and its constitution. In such circumstances +the condition of a republic is the most fearful that can +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_45">[45]</span>be imagined. The collective national wealth is never the +main thing: I am convinced that in England, if the middle +classes are destroyed (and such a middle class scarcely +exists, for the people are either very rich or very poor), +morals will decay, and that the nation will come to a point, +where it can no longer enjoy its liberty, and will perish by +internal convulsions: Hume has predicted this long ago. +Whoever wishes to promote and preserve freedom, must +first ask himself, Is it possible to preserve morality, virtue, +and honesty? Have the morals of the people retained their +purity? Do they respect themselves, their fellow-men, and +God? If this is not the case, liberty is a curse and not +a blessing. Such was the case of the Romans under Augustus: +terrible as was his government, still there was no +other way. In like manner, the revolution of the 18th +Brumaire was the most fortunate event for France, and by +it Napoleon did more for the country than by his victories. +In his circumstances Augustus could not ask himself, “Is it +not a handsome thing to preserve the ancient forms?” but, +“What is the task I have to accomplish, especially how can +I restore security?” For a man’s life was not safe even in +his bed. Home and its vicinity were then probably even +more unsafe than in our times; no one then could go +from Rome to Albano without risking his life, whereas +now even in the worst seasons no one has any thing to fear +there. Whoever went out in the dark, had reason to be +grateful, if he escaped with his life. Augustus, therefore, +with a feeling that it could not be otherwise, divided the +city into fourteen regions. In like manner the Christians +in the earliest times divided themselves into seven deaneries +or ecclesiastical regions, which, however, were by no means +as distinctly marked as has sometimes been supposed; and +it is evident from monuments that the ancient boundaries +were not observed in them. This division into seven continued +until a late period of the middle ages, and afterwards +we find seven Cardinals, and seven civil dignitaries. Even +at the present day Rome is divided into fourteen regions; +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_46">[46]</span>during the middle ages this number was not kept up, but +Sixtus V. again made it up by adding the Borgo.</p> + +<p>How much have these numbers been trifled with! The +seven arms of the chandelier in the temple of Jerusalem, +the seven days of the week, and even the seven planets +have been pressed into the service to explain them. But +such explanations may be found for any number. At the +time of the French revolution I knew a good-natured man, +who enthusiastically took up every change and demonstrated +that, as man has five fingers and five senses, the Directoire +and the Council of the Five Hundred was the most perfect +form of government. When there were three consuls, he +comprehended this too and found it quite natural; and +when at last there was only one, he declared that it was +all right, for that unity must prevail in nature. Such +trifling with numbers is a bad thing.</p> + +<p>I have already spoken to you about the physical character +of the whole district. The ground is volcanic, +the stones are tufo, and the loose soil puzzolano. These +volcanic substances are very useful as cement and very +durable. Wherever in architectural structures the ancients +speak of <i>arena</i>, we have to understand puzzolano; we +translate it indeed by “sand,” but it is a volcanic sand. Thus +we read in Cicero’s speech for Cluentius that a dead body +was found in a sand-pit (<i>arenaria</i>); such pits were dug very +deep and were very extensive. Of the same kind are the +catacombs at Rome: they are large subterraneous passages, +which, if due care was taken in their construction, did not +fall in. In my lectures on Roman antiquities, I have said +that these catacombs were the ordinary burial places for the +poor. This much may suffice about the hills.</p> + +<p>In the earliest times, the Tiber extended between the +Palatine and the Aventine, for there the river, as I have +already remarked, formed a bay of the sea, and the district +between the Tarpeian and the Palatine hills was a marsh, +which, when the waters rose high, became a lake: afterwards +this place was the <i>Forum</i>. The valley between the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_47">[47]</span>Palatine and Aventine was always filled with water, independent +of inundations, for the river there formed a real +bay: this district was called the <i>Velabrum</i>. Rome consisted, +for the most part, of isolated patches of houses on the hills, +for the marsh extended from the Forum to the valley +between the Viminal and Esquiline. When you examine +the history of the restoration of the city, and inquire as to +which district was marshy, you find that even now the +place once occupied by the Forum Augusti is called +Pantani (marsh). For the purpose of draining this marsh, +the Romans built the sewers, which are ascribed to +one of the Tarquins—it is uncertain whether to the +father or to the son—and which still exist. The intention +was to drain the whole of the lower districts between the +Palatine, Aventine, Capitoline, Esquiline, and the sea, to +facilitate the communication between the several hills, to +render the plain fit for agriculture, instead of cultivating +only the sides of the hills, and at the same time to make +the city inhabitable in regard to fortifications: in like +manner London has, within a period of twenty years, +become an entirely new city; for many thousands of houses +have been bought and pulled down for the purpose of +making the streets broader. It was necessary to make an +embankment by the river side in order to obtain firm ground +behind it, and then to build the great sewers (<i>cloacae</i>). +We must not conceive these works to be executed according +to our dwarfish notions: they were large vaults receiving +the waters of the low districts and carrying them into +the river; I always feel sorry to be obliged to use an ignoble +name for those magnificent works. The marsh then had +to be filled up, which is not indeed mentioned by the +ancients, but is self-evident. Afterwards, these cloacae +were extended at different times, under the Forum as far as +the Subura between the Viminal and the Esquiline, so that +all those districts were drained by a vast system of sewers. +Thus Rome, throughout this extent, was reclaimed as +building ground. I shall afterwards have to say something +more about these cloacae.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_48">[48]</span></p> + +<p>Most Italian towns were in ancient times situated on hills, +but were then not surrounded with walls any more than the +Epirot towns, but localities were chosen where a hill was +naturally inaccessible, or it was made inaccessible by artificial +means. The hill Moriah, on which king Solomon built the +temple, was originally such a hill, and it still preserves its +square form amid its ruins. The ancients at most drew a +wall around the base of the hill, which was either a Cyclopean +or an Etruscan (i.e., a regular) wall, so as to render it inaccessible;⁠<a id="FNanchor_8" href="#Footnote_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> +at the top of the hill there was no wall, at most +a small bulwark, but in most cases even this did not exist. +A sloping road (<i>clivus</i>) with two towers at the foot led up +the hill, and along it ran a portico, or two walls, usually +built in a zigzag. At the top there was another gate which +could be closed, and which was generally flanked by two +towers, so that the access might be closed both at the foot and +at the top. Such was in general the character of the Latin +towns, more or less perfect, and built regularly or irregularly +according to the nature of the locality; and of this kind +must have been the small Latin and Sabine towns out of +which arose the eternal city. These places stood quite +isolated, and each had its own arx, which perfectly explains +Virgil’s expression <i>Septemque una sibi muro circumdedit +arces</i>; these were the strong places in Rome itself, which are +so often mentioned by Livy and Dionysius. Rome, therefore, +had not one arx, but seven. These seven arces were +then connected by means of the agger, which extended from +the Colline to the Esquiline gate. In some parts of this +circumference the ancient fortification remained; for example, +the Quirinal (which was so high that it was necessary +to make a flight of steps, which was transferred in the +fourteenth century to Araceli⁠<a id="FNanchor_9" href="#Footnote_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a>⁠) had one very precipitous +side, which required no fortification; but from it to the +Capitoline a wall was built. Thence the fortification proceeded +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_49">[49]</span>to the corner of the Aventine. This course of the +ancient walls has been mistaken by all antiquarians, except +a few belonging to the sixteenth century; I discovered +its real course from the nature of the circumstances; I +lived in the neighbourhood, and found the remains, for +on the one side of the street there runs a ridge of ruins. +This wall alone prevented the Tiber from overflowing the +Forum, while outside the gate the inundations were very +great; when, therefore, in the seventh century the wall +was neglected, the Forum and the adjoining districts, as +far as the porta Carmentalis, were completely inundated. +In ancient Rome, this could not have happened. The +Aventine is still high enough to show, that properly it +required no wall, and its precipitous side towards the river +may still be seen; but from that point again a wall runs +towards the Caelius, for the most part behind the ditch +which is now called Marrana, but anciently (Pliny) bore the +name of <i>fossa Quiritium</i>. Coming from the Campagna this +ditch runs along the foot of the Caelius, traverses the valley +of the Murcia towards the river, and in the Circus it +appears as a Euripus. Of the wall from the Aventine to +the Caelius traces likewise still exist in the ridge of ruins +in the lanes of that district. This fortification, then, closed +the valley between the Caelius and Palatine. The Caelius +was probably surrounded by a wall, for its sides cannot +have been steep enough to protect it. The wall then proceeded +through the valley towards the Esquiline gate, and +was thus carried to the point where it joined the agger. +This circumference of the city amounted to somewhat more +than five English miles, and is known under the name of +the wall of Servius Tullius (<i>recinto di Servio Tullio, murus +Servii regis</i>, in Pliny). The wall did not run round the +whole city, for along the Quirinal and the Capitoline there +was no real wall. The <i>insula Tiberina</i> is in the reach of the +river, which in the west of the city forms the <i>Campus +Martius</i>, a perfect plain outside the ancient city. At present +this plain is covered with scattered hillocks which have been +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_50">[50]</span>formed by rubbish deposited there; there were also a few +marshes, but not as many as Brocchi asserts.</p> + +<p>The <i>Marrana</i> is a ditch running from Alba to Rome, +respecting which antiquarians are strangely mistaken, and +about which the most singular conjectures have been propounded. +It is supposed that it is not mentioned in the +works of the ancients; while some think that it is the <i>aqua +damnata</i>, an aqueduct, and others that it is the <i>aqua crabra</i>, +a beautiful spring, which, however, has its source near +Tusculum, and is for the most part consumed there. But +the Marrana is nothing but a ditch: in the vale of Grotta +ferrata there existed in ancient times a lake, which had two +outlets for its waters, one channel being cut through to the +Anio, and the other a tunnel cut through the rock. I am +sorry to say that I have not seen it myself, but I have read +of it in the work, “De aquis et aquaeductibus,” by Fabretti, +a scholar of the seventeenth century; his work is very excellent, +and I only regret that I did not read it until I had +left Rome; it contains a number of original investigations, +for the author did not, like many others, confine himself +to studying antiquities from books. Fabretti discovered the +<i>Fossa Cluilia</i> at the foot of a hill near Frascati, on which +are situated the Centroni. They were pointed out to me +by an aged peasant, for, wherever it was possible, I tried +to make the acquaintance of country people, who very +often know something about the ruins which we find +mentioned in old books. It has for a long time been the +misfortune of foreigners at Rome, not to see more than +what is noticed in books. There are, for example, three +pillars, remnants of a portico, in a cellar not far from the +place in which I lived; and I was apprised of their existence +by an old man who was a scholar. Another likewise +very interesting ruin exists in a vault under the Capitol; to +judge from the style of architecture, it cannot be of a more +recent date than the age of Augustus; I have, unfortunately, +not seen it myself, but a friend has sent me a +description of it. Fabretti calls the tunnel of which I +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_51">[51]</span>spoke before, an <i>opus priscae magnificentiae</i>. This is the +<i>Fossa Cluilia</i>, by means of which the valley was drained; +it is a work of Alban origin; its continuation towards +Rome was called <i>Fossa Quiritium</i>, and is the present Marrana. +From this fact we may, at the risk of not going +wrong more than a hundred paces, fix the spot on which +the ancients conceived the combat between the Horatii and +Curiatii to have taken place: respecting this point also the +most erroneous notions have prevailed. By the same means, +we are enabled accurately to point out the boundary line +of Latium, and the spot where the Romans thought Coriolanus +to have been encamped. These facts have occurred +to no one, because nobody remembered that, before Appius +Claudius made the via Appia, the via Latina was the only +road in that direction. The Fossa Quiritium was regarded +as the work of Ancus Martius; it runs between the Aventine +and Palatine into the Velabrum, and terminates in the +cloacae.</p> + +<p>In most maps the walls of Rome are seen continued in +the form of a triangle beyond the Tiber towards the Janiculus; +the walls forming σκέλη proceeding from the Capitol +and the Aventine. But this is altogether a mistake. In +the age of Augustus, suburbs certainly did exist beyond +the Tiber, and I have reasons for supposing that they +existed there even at the period of the republic, at least in +the seventh century. But it is a mistake to continue the +walls so far, for the Romans had long ceased heeding the +walls in extending their city. The following circumstance +is a proof of this: Rome had only a single bridge across +the Tiber, viz. the Pons Sublicius. Now it is said, that +the Fabii went out by the Porta Carmentalis, and then +proceeded across the bridge into the Etruscan territory. +They passed through the Porta Carmentalis because they +dwelt on the Quirinal; if they had lived on the Aventine, +they would have passed through the Porta Flumentana. +The bridge, therefore, evidently lay outside the walls, for +otherwise they would have had to pass through two gates, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_52">[52]</span>and two gates would have become <i>nefastae</i>. Moreover, +Varro, “De Lingua Latina,” says, that the carceres of the +Circus Maximus were close to the wall of the city,⁠<a id="FNanchor_10" href="#Footnote_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> which +in his sense is perfectly correct; for the <i>carceres</i> cannot +have been more than a stone’s throw from the wall which +ran from the Capitoline to the Aventine.</p> + +<p>The city was spacious even within the circumference +given to it by Servius, but it ever increased, and suburbs +sprang up around it. The first trace of such a suburb +occurs in the second Punic war. If we possessed the +second decad of Livy, we should perhaps find that it existed +even at an earlier period. The account of a great conflagration, +which occurred during the Hannibalian war, shows +that a large and beautiful suburb existed in the district +between the Capitoline, Aventine, the Circus Maximus, +and the river, that is, in the region of the <i>Forum olitorium, +extra portam Flumentanam</i>.</p> + +<p>It is natural that in a city like Rome, which had already +become the capital of a great empire, the empty spaces +within the walls were gradually filled up, and that the +ancient <i>luci</i>, especially about the Esquiline, were more and +more cleared away and filled up with buildings. The extension +of large cities generally takes the direction of the +principal streets: when, for example, cities like Paris and +London extend, the newly-built houses follow the lines of +the main streets, and are continued outside the gates; the +streets thus become lengthened, and are intersected by cross +roads. But this system had at Rome to contend with a +difficulty, which is generally overlooked. It was customary +with the ancients, not only at Rome but also in the Greek +cities, to build sepulchres outside the gates on both sides of +the road. The ruins of Pompeii show this distinctly. It +was accordingly impossible to continue the buildings there, +without destroying the tombs. The sepulchral monuments +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_53">[53]</span>at Rome were subsequently destroyed by barbarism and +fanaticism; as most of them were of marble and other +costly stones, they were demolished for the sake of plunder. +The district of the tombs has now a frightful appearance: +the via Appia looks like a corpse, and no one visits it. +During summer, when one might be inclined to go there, +the country is covered with corn-fields, and in winter herds +of cattle graze there; and the herdsmen are generally accompanied +by large dogs which attack strangers with great +fury; Goethe was in danger of losing his life in that district. +The herdsmen are suspected of sometimes causing strangers +to be torn to pieces in order to be able to rob them, whence +it is necessary to arm one’s self when visiting the district. +From an eminence in the neighbourhood you can see the +course of the ancient road to a considerable distance, and +along it you see nothing but tombs in ruins. Some of +them, as we know from Boissard’s description, were entire +as late as the sixteenth century; but the Romans have demolished +and carried away every thing, and not a stone of +any value has been left. The whole of this road was a succession +of tombs, it was a real necropolis like that of Alexandria. +Hence Rome was always extended between two +diverging roads, and gardens were thus formed between the +open country and the fields. In ancient Rome you must +well distinguish between <i>horti</i> and <i>villae</i>; at present we +make no distinction, and the name <i>villa</i> is applied to a +house in a garden, even within the walls of a city; but in +ancient times a villa was always at a considerable distance +from the city. <i>Horti</i>, on the other hand, still called <i>orti</i>, +originally signified mere orchards in the vicinity of the +city. Such <i>horti</i> were bought by the wealthy at the time +when the city became too confined, and having purchased +many of them together they built palaces with suitable +pleasure grounds in those districts between the great high +roads. Thus Scipio, in the work “De Re Publica,” is said +to have made up his mind to be <i>in hortis</i>. I have discovered +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_54">[54]</span>the <i>horti Aemilii</i>, which were situated on the border of the +Campus Martius. Such studies and inquiries make a residence +at Rome extremely attractive. In the first year I +could not see my way clearly, but afterwards, when I had +once discovered the thread, I became quite at home there. +Had it not been for my family and the education of my +children, whom I was anxious to have brought up in the +German way, I could never have resolved to quit Rome, +because ancient Rome became daily more clear and vivid +before my mind, while modern Rome disappeared more +and more from my view; the climate also agreed very well +with me. The large palaces, to return to my subject, were +situated outside the ancient walls. It is a most erroneous +opinion that the palace of Maecenas was situated on the +spot afterwards occupied by the Thermae of Titus; for it +was outside the wall in the Campus Esquilinus.</p> + +<p>The city now became extended in various ways. Industrious +artizans established themselves by the river-side, and +also on the other side of it (<i>trans Tiberim</i>). That this +latter district was inhabited as a distinct quarter as early as +the time of Augustus, is evident from the fact, that he made +it a separate region; and this is at the same time a proof +that it was thickly peopled. For although most other +regions were of nearly equal extent, this one was comparatively +small, which arose from the circumstance, that the +great mass and the condition of its inhabitants required a +more watchful vigilance of the police. This is the reason +why that region was smaller than those in other parts. For +opposite reasons, another region near the Porta Capena, +in which the population was more dispersed, and which +contained more palaces, was made unusually large. Suburbs +existed as early as the Punic wars, and in the time of +Marius and Sulla, the whole city was surrounded with +suburbs; the ancient walls were then forgotten, and it +seems that, for the purpose of removing all impediments of +communication, even the gates were taken off their hinges. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_55">[55]</span>Along the river there was no obstacle, hence buildings were +erected there under the Capitoline and Palatine.⁠<a id="FNanchor_11" href="#Footnote_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a> It is +commonly imagined that the whole district at the reach of +the Tiber was called Campus Martius, but the Campus +occupied only a part of it. At the foot of the Quirinal, +too, buildings were erected, and all these enlargements may +have narrowed the Campus Martius. In other parts the +gardens were isolated, not forming a connected quarter. +One suburb was situated at the distance of a Roman mile +from the city, on the Appian road; it was even outside the +Aurelian wall, which is still standing, and was called <i>ad +Martis</i>.</p> + +<p>When the city had become thus enlarged, there followed +the conflagration of Nero, the effects of which have not yet +been made clear, but I hope some time to be able to give +a satisfactory account of it. The Palatine, a part of Caelius +and the district about the Circus were, perhaps, completely +reduced to ashes; so also the Via Flaminia on the west of +the Capitol; but other parts were less injured.</p> + +<p>In Pliny (iii. 9), we meet with the strange expression: +<i>Moenia ejus collegere ambitu Imperatoribus Censoribusque +Vespasianis, anno conditae <span class="allsmcap">DCCCXXVII.</span> pass. <span class="allsmcap">XIIIMCC.</span></i>, an expression +which proves in a striking manner that an accurate +knowledge of language and etymology cannot be dispensed +with, even in matters which we observe with our own eyes. +It has been unjustly inferred from this passage, that in the +reign of Vespasian Rome was provided with walls, and +those, too, of a much wider circumference than those of +Servius. This arose from ignorance of the fact that, according +to the most ancient Roman usage, <i>moenia</i> always +signifies “buildings.” In like manner, Virgil’s expression, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_56">[56]</span><i>Dividimus muros et moenia pandimus urbis</i>, contains no tautology, +as was well-known to the ancient grammarians, for +the meaning is: “we break the walls, and thereby lay open +the buildings of the city.” So also Florus, who sometimes +follows the ancient usage, says: <i>hic igitur et moenia muro +amplexus</i>. We must accordingly understand the passage of +Pliny as comprising the whole complex of Rome, as it was +measured in the time of Vespasian, which, of course, is a +variable magnitude. As it is generally understood, the +expression would be as absurd, as if I were to say: the walls +of the city of Cologne, in 1828, were of such or such an +extent, having, of course, had the same circumference two +hundred years ago. Rome had long since been extended +beyond the ancient walls, which were now, in fact, in the +midst of the city; the towers had been taken down, and +people built houses there, the interdicts against building on +the pomoerium being no longer attended to. In like manner +the foundations of the ancient walls of London may still +be discerned among the houses. From Frontinus’ work on +Aqueducts, we see how, though the police was excellent, +abuses had crept in, although not as many as at present, +because the lower administration was not carried on in so +servile a manner; when an experienced man was entrusted +with the superintendence, things went on fairly, but if not, +every one took the greatest liberty. Such was the case at +Rome, until Frontinus came forward as a reformer. The disorder +was then so great that any one built a house wherever +he pleased, without asking whether he had a right to do so +or not; and hence the city ever continued to extend. I +have made a series of observations on the origin of particular +buildings, in order to see approximately, how the city +became enlarged under the several emperors. In the reign +of Augustus, the Campus Martius was principally chosen for +the erection of large buildings: there Agrippa built his +Thermae and the Pantheon, and Augustus his Mausoleum; +for the Campus was no longer the plain for reviewing the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_57">[57]</span>citizens, nor were the mock-comitia of the centuries held +there any longer, but it was confined to a small plain near +the river, as may be seen from Pliny’s panegyric on Trajan. +This part of the Campus, according to a regulation of +Agrippa, was watered throughout the summer, and hence +always presented a green lawn. The summer is at Rome +much more terrible than winter, for the grass is scorched to +its very roots; in September it is green, but in July and the +dreadful month of August, all the foliage is scorched and +covered with dust, so that it presents the most melancholy appearance, +and the grounds, like the fields, are, nearly as in +Egypt, a picture of death.—In the time of Trajan the Romans +built in the same way as is now done in London, where +people do not only enlarge the town, but spare no expenses +in embellishing it. Enormous works were undertaken in +the interior, merely to gain ground. To make room for +the Forum of Trajan, a part of the Quirinal was taken +down, and many houses were demolished to gain the +magnificent space, so that it cost many millions before the +foundations could be laid. Antonine erected in the Campus +Martius his basilica, his column, and other edifices. Rome +was, in fact, ever increasing down to the third century. +Even in the time of Alexander Severus, although there +existed men of great intelligence, very few seem to have +suspected that the nation was in a state of decay, and that +a destructive storm was approaching. Dangers in which +the empire might have perished did not become visible +until the reign of Decius, when the German tribes, the +Goths, Alemanni, and Longobards (Juthungi) crossed +the boundaries of the empire. They penetrated as far as +the river Po, and as Marius had conquered the Cimbri, so +Aurelian defeated those tribes in the north of the Po, and +saved Italy. Aurelian now found it necessary to surround +the city with a new wall, which was essentially the same as +the present one. He did not comprise all the suburbs +within its circumference, but was guided by the course of +the hills; the whole of the <i>Collis hortulorum</i>, however, and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_58">[58]</span>the mighty ravine in the neighbourhood were drawn into +it and fortified. This wall was exceedingly strong: in the +east he was obliged, as Servius had done before, to raise it +to a great height.</p> + +<p>This was the circumference of Rome, until Leo IV. +drew the Vatican into the city and surrounded it with a +wall. In the sixteenth century the Vatican was connected +with Trastevere by means of the Lungara; and thus arose +the present circumference, a fact which cannot be denied, +although it has been inferred that the wall was fifteen +Roman miles in circumference.⁠<a id="FNanchor_12" href="#Footnote_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> The present walls are +altogether restorations, and probably no part of them belongs +to Aurelian. Under the later emperors they again +fell into decay; previous to the siege by the Goths, Honorius +ordered them to be cleared of the heaps of rubbish which +had accumulated by the side of them, and to be restored +(<i>egestis immensibus ruderibus</i>). Afterwards one third of the +wall was demolished by Totilas. Very few of the gates belonging +to the time of Honorius now exist, as is clear +from the inscriptions; they can be clearly distinguished +from those which were built in the sixth century under +Gregory the Great, who restored them in every way, for +the purpose of protecting the city against the Lombards.</p> + +<p>The walls of Servius and Aurelian, although the facts +were known, were by no means properly distinguished by +the antiquarians and commentators of the sixteenth and +seventeenth centuries. It was only in the eighteenth century +that a correct notion was formed of the course of the +walls of Rome, and the great D’Anville in this matter also +showed his keen judgment and ready tact, although his +outline, too, is not quite correct. The more ancient the +antiquarians are, the less do they distinguish between the +two walls; they sought the Esquiline and Colline gates in +the line of the present wall, though they must have known +that this did not accord with all the rest; but where a +difficulty occurred they helped themselves by accommodation. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_59">[59]</span>At present the matter has been made pretty clear; +Nibby’s work on the Roman walls contains for the most +part correct views.</p> + +<p>I will now proceed to enumerate the gates, as they are +extremely important in the earliest history of Rome. It is +said that the most ancient Rome on the Palatine had three +gates; but this must be understood to refer to the extent of +Rome comprising the plain round the Palatine, where a +suburb was separated by means of a trench and palisades. +These gates are not the same in all authors; the <i>Porta +Mugonia</i> alone, near the temple in the Via Nova, is historical; +it is mentioned by Solinus, and Tarquinius Priscus +is said to have dwelt there. You must not, therefore, seek +for these gates on the hill, but below Cermalus.</p> + +<p>The northernmost gate is the <i>Porta Collina</i>, near the +Quirinal, where the mound of Servius Tullius began. Before +it there is a field, and then comes the valley across +which you pass through the gardens of Sallust towards +Monte Pincio. Here, on the road to the Porta Salara⁠<a id="FNanchor_13" href="#Footnote_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a>⁠, we +must conceive the point where Hannibal rode up to the +walls of Rome, and hurled his spear into the city, and +where Sulla defeated the Samnites. The <i>Porta Esquilina</i> +was at the other end of the Servian agger, and between +them was the <i>Porta Viminalis</i>. Ficoroni has very successfully +made out the site of the Porta Esquilina behind the +church of S. Maria Maggiore. After the Esquiline gate +there follows the <i>Caelimontana</i>, the site of which cannot be +accurately determined; but that the arch on the Caelius +with an inscription by Dolabella⁠<a id="FNanchor_14" href="#Footnote_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a>⁠, is not a Roman gate, is +obvious to any one who has a notion of the structure of a +Roman gate. Then comes the <i>Porta Capena</i>, in the valley +below the Caelius. Piranesi, an intelligent and clever +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_60">[60]</span>man, discovered it about fifty years ago by well conducted +excavations; but the spot has been covered over again, and +not even a mark has been put there. Then follows the +<i>Porta Naevia</i> near the Aventine, whether on the side +towards the Caelius, or at the southern extremity, on the +spot where now the bulwark of Paul III. exists, cannot +be ascertained. This gate is the largest. In order to discover +any thing more definite about it, it would be necessary +to make excavations, and it would have made me extremely +happy, if I had been allowed to do so. But gladly as I +would have done it, even at my own expense, I had to +struggle with too great difficulties, especially caused by +Monsignor Fea, who always had some objection, when a +proposal was made, although he had no certain conviction +of his own. He generally thwarted my attempts. When +once by accident he consented to Count Funchal making +excavations on the Capitol, the thing sought for was found. +He never would be wrong, though he is otherwise an +honest man, and has the reputation of great disinterestedness; +but he is arrogant, confident, and impertinent; he +becomes enraged, and never allows a matter to be inquired +into, and to prevent it he would even have recourse to +intrigues and tricks. Thus, although I wished to make +excavations at my own expense, and although I offered to +take nothing for myself, and to surrender every thing to +the Papal government—I only wished to copy what I +might find—still I could not obtain permission. And this +was done, in order that new discoveries might not overthrow +the current theories. But I understand that things are now +going on better.</p> + +<p>In that district there are two gates, the <i>Raudusculana</i>, +probably at the southern extremity, and the <i>Naevia</i>. Then +came the <i>Porta Trigemina</i>, below the Aventine, between it +and the Tiber, just as the Capena was below the Caelius. +Whence the Trigemina derived its name I will mention +after the enumeration of the gates, when I shall have to +speak of their construction. The <i>Porta Flumentana</i> was +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_61">[61]</span>between the Circus and the river. The last important +gate, the <i>Porta Carmentalis</i>, was between the Capitol and +the Quirinal. Thus we again reach the Collina by the +long line of the Quirinal.</p> + +<p>These are the more important gates of Rome, but there +were several others besides. I have given you a list of them, +because they are generally stated erroneously from the +Naevia onwards. I cannot here attempt to prove my statements, +for it would be impossible for you to appreciate or +examine the arguments, but you will give me credit, that +I have said nothing but what, according to my full conviction, +is correct, and I can speak to you with that confidence +as if I had seen the objects only a moment ago. Independently +of the large gates, there must have been some smaller +door-ways, especially in the long line between the Porta +Carmentalis and Collina, but in some other parts also, in +which cases a flight of steps must have led down the hills. +These smaller means of egress came more and more into use +at the time when the fortifications had become unnecessary, +and when Rome was enlarged beyond the walls. During +the period of the republic, the Romans had no excise duties, +which were not introduced until the time of the emperors; +hence I see no reason why such means of egress should have +been forbidden.</p> + +<p>The peculiarity of the Roman gates is, that they had +two arches by the side of each other, as is the case in the +Porta Nigra at Treves, for there can be no doubt that the +Porta Nigra was a Roman gate, with a basilica on each +side of it. Each of these two arches was called <i>Janus</i>, the +one <i>Janus dexter</i>, and the other <i>Janus sinister</i>; by the +former people left the town, and by the latter they entered +it; and every person kept to the right in order to avoid +crowding and collision. The Porta Trigemina must have +had a threefold Janus, though I cannot conjecture for what +reason; it is possible that the third was destined for vehicles, +or that it was a mere ornament. Strange opinions are +current about this gate, as, for example, that the Horatii +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_62">[62]</span>and Curiatii passed through it; but this is impossible, they +must have gone out by the Porta Capena.</p> + +<p>Over the Capena there ran an aqueduct, which in the +reign of Domitian must have been damaged, whence +Juvenal and Martial speak of <i>madida Capena</i>.</p> + +<p>The Porta Carmentalis can be regarded as a gate of the +Capitol only in an improper sense; it was connected only +with the continuation of the <i>clivus Capitolinus</i>.</p> + +<p>The circumference of the walls of Servius Tullius thus +contained ten gates. Some of them derived their names +from the hills; the Collina from the Collis Quirinalis, which +was pre-eminently called <i>the</i> Collis, the Capena probably +owed its name to the fact of its leading to Capua, or to the +<i>lucus Capenas</i>, the grove of the Camenae; the Naevia to +the Silva Naevia, the Carmentalis to a sanctuary of Carmentis +in the neighbourhood, the Raudusculana to the fact +of its being covered with brass, and the Flumentana to the +river.</p> + +<p>The larger circumference of the wall of Aurelian extended +as far as the banks of the Tiber, where now no wall exists, +because the Borgo and the Castel Angelo are united with +the city. On the left bank the foundations of the wall are +still the same, though the walls themselves have at different +times been entirely restored. Not a stone of the ancient +wall now remains, and if there should be any, they belong +to the restoration of Honorius. Totilas demolished the +greater part of it; afterwards it was repeatedly destroyed +and restored again.⁠<a id="FNanchor_15" href="#Footnote_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a>⁠</p> + +<p>The gates of the wall of Aurelian were called after the +streets from which they led. In former times a large road +led from the Porta Collina northward, and branched off +into two, the <i>Via Salaria</i> and the <i>Via Nomentana</i>; the Via +Tiburtina, afterwards called <i>Valeria</i>, issued from the Porta +Viminalis; and another issued from the Porta Esquilina, +which branched off into the <i>Via Praenestina</i> and the <i>Via +Labicana</i>. The <i>Via Appia</i> and <i>Via Latina</i> began at the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_63">[63]</span>Capena, and a road branching off from the Appia was +called <i>Campana</i>.⁠<a id="FNanchor_16" href="#Footnote_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a> The <i>Via Ardeatina</i> proceeded from the +Porta Raudusculana, while the <i>Via Ostiensis</i> issued from +the Porta Naevia or Trigemina, for these two must have +been near each other. The <i>Via Portuensis</i> was on the other +side of the river, and the <i>Via Cassia</i> ran over the hill; +from the bridge <i>Pons Aelius</i>, a street ran close by the +mausoleum of Hadrian, which probably bore the name of <i>Via +Aelia</i>; but the matter is obscure. The <i>Via Flaminia</i> proceeded +straightway from the Porta Carmentalis to Ariminum.</p> + +<p>Not one of these roads was blocked up by the wall of +Aurelian, and wherever gates were made in the latter, they +received their names from the streets into which they led. +Thus we find the Porta Flaminia, Porta Pinciana (a secondary +gate near the Collina, leading probably to a less important +way, not a high-road, a gate being necessary for the +palace), P. Salaria, P. Nomentana, and then two Portae +Tiburtinae, because there were two roads leading to Tibur; +one of these gates seems to have had no particular name of +its own, though it may have been called P. Valeria. Next +came the P. Praenestina and Labicana, both in one building, +though distinct; P. Metronia (probably named after a +palace), P. Latina, P. Asinaria (P. S. Giovanni), P. Appia, +P. Ardeatina, P. Ostiensis, beyond the river P. Portuensis, +P. Septimiana or Aurelia, between the Janiculus and the +river, probably named after the Thermae of Septimius +Severus; and at the bridge (Pons Aelius) the P. Aelia. +With the exception of the Pincia and Metronia, you still +find almost the same gates leading to the same roads. +This circumference of Rome is mentioned by Procopius in +his account of the siege of the city. In the sixth century a +change took place in the nomenclature, many gates receiving +new names from the nearest important churches: thus the +P. Asinaria was at a very early date called P. S. Giovanni; the +P. Appia, P. S. Sebastiani, from a basilica; the P. Ostiensis, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_64">[64]</span>S. Pauli; P. Aurelia, S. Pancratii; the P. S. Lorenzo +(Praenestina) also received its name from the basilica +S. Laurentii. The P. Salaria and Nomentana retained their +names until the sixteenth century.</p> + +<p>I cannot enter so fully into the topography of Rome as +to show you how the streets of Rome were continued +throughout Italy and the whole Roman empire. But, as +architectural structures, the Roman high-roads are the +most magnificent remains of antiquity. They consist of +polished polygons of basalt: the foundation was formed of +large stones, more than a cubit deep; over them was laid a +stratum of mortar made of lime and puzzolano. Upon this +a kind of excellent bricks were broken in large pieces, and +laid in strata, over which again a cement was poured, which +completely hardened into stone. Upon this substratum the +blocks of basalt were placed, the lower surface of which +was cut perfectly smooth. The polygons were very large, +but different in circumference; they are so well fitted +together, that in many parts the point of a pen-knife cannot +be pressed between them; they were cut with great care, +and must have been polished in a peculiar manner. A line +is seen between two stones, but there is no interstice. +Even if accidentally the water penetrated from above, the +lower part was perfectly waterproof. It is well known +that roads are mainly injured by water. Whoever has seen +those ancient roads, despises the wretched structures of +modern times; but if we were to build them now in the +same manner, we should be obliged to sacrifice their external +beauty and cover them with sand, because horses +shod with iron would not be able to run on the surface, +which is as smooth as a mirror. The horses of the ancients +were not shod, and mules had either a kind of wooden +shoes or soles of matting. Near and at Tivoli large parts of +such roads exist in a state of preservation so perfect, as if +they had been made only a year ago; but no vehicles now +go over them. In comparison with ourselves, the ancients +used carriages very rarely, and burdens were mostly carried +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_65">[65]</span>by mules. On each side of the road there was a pavement +for foot-passengers, and at intervals stones were set up, +to enable men to get upon their horses, as stirrups were +unknown.</p> + +<p>In regard to the interior of Rome, it is erroneous to +speak only of hills, for in later times they constituted only +the smallest part of the city; a great portion being situated +in valleys and another in plains. But I will first speak of +the hills.</p> + +<p>The real centre of the later city consisted of the <i>Capitoline +Hill</i>, which, though not of great circumference, is properly +composed of two hills, a southern one towards the Forum, +and a northern one; between them a considerable depression +of the ground is still visible. This depression, however, +was far greater in ancient times than it is now, and in +it there was a portico open on both sides, but at present +its back is filled up with rubbish, especially from the ruins +of the Capitoline temple, which, like many other buildings, +has been purposely and barbarously destroyed. There was +a <i>clivus</i> leading up the Capitoline hill from the Forum, +which, as in the case of all the Roman hills, formed an +inclined plain ascending gradually. The names of the <i>clivi</i> +of all the other hills, however, are not known. On the +Quirinal I do not find a <i>clivus</i>, but it had a <i>semita</i>. The +meaning of this latter term is not correctly given in our +dictionaries: the <i>semita</i> does not differ so much from a +carriage road by being less in breadth, but it is altogether +a way which no vehicles can pass, either from its want of +breadth, or from its construction in other respects, and +which therefore is available only to foot-passengers and +mules; <i>semitae</i> were ways like the one still existing in the +Vatican palace, by which the pope can ride on a mule into +his own apartment. In Germany there is nothing comparable +to it; the Italian name is <i>cordonata</i>, and it must +be conceived as a strongly, though not inconveniently, +inclined plain, with high stones at certain intervals for the +purpose of stopping, so that the second step begins lower +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_66">[66]</span>than the point at which the first left off.⁠<a id="FNanchor_17" href="#Footnote_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> Semitae +are also found at gates, especially of Cyclopean towns, as +at Ferentino. Before the time of Trajan there is no trace +of a clivus leading up the Quirinal; on the Esquiline I can +prove its existence; the Palatine had two clivi, the Aventine +one, etc.</p> + +<p>Rome was essentially different from large modern cities +which always contain main streets running from one end to +the other; such a street cannot be shown to have existed +at Rome, which altogether had but few great streets. All +the houses built on the same hill formed, as it were, a +small town by themselves with little, and probably extremely +irregular, streets, and thus every hill was isolated. +It was only the plains and valleys that contained some +large streets. The <i>Esquiliae</i> were not a separate street, and +the <i>Carinae</i> near the Esquiline also were a quarter of the city +rather than a street; the <i>Subura</i> beyond the Esquiliae was a +real street, and so also the <i>Via Sacra</i> up to a certain point, +but it was not a main street.</p> + +<p>The intermontium of the Capitoline hill contained the +<i>asylum</i>. The southern half of the Capitol, towards +both the Tiber and the Forum, formed the <i>Tarpeian +Rock</i>, which did not, as is commonly believed, consist +of one side only. A French scholar, Dureau de la +Malle, several years ago wrote an excellent essay on this +subject, entitled “Mémoire sur la position de la roche +Tarpéienne, lu à l’Académie des Inscriptions et Belles +Lettres.” The same scholar is the author of a very able +translation of Tacitus; he has been at Rome, and his work +furnishes evidence of very correct observations and sound +judgment. The Tarpeian rock was cut quite precipitous, +a circumstance which at present is not visible everywhere, +because houses of six and seven stories in height were built +there, which, when demolished in the time of destruction, +formed heaps of rubbish as high as two-thirds of the rock, +and upon this rubbish houses were afterwards erected. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_67">[67]</span>In one part of the rock there was a flight of one hundred +steps, which was visible as late as the twelfth century.</p> + +<p>The exact site of the Capitoline temple is a much disputed +question among antiquarians; it is strange that no +ruins of it are remaining. The old opinion which was +generally adopted until the time of Nardini, is the true +one: Fulvius, Marliani, and Donati all agreed in stating +that the temple was situated on the southern part of the +hill; but Nardini perverts the whole matter by placing it +on the north side on the site now occupied by the church +and convent of Araceli; the northern part formed the <i>arx</i>, +as is clear from the history of the Gallic war; it was a very +steep height, not a fortress, but only a strong point, and +was occupied by houses of private citizens.</p> + +<p>The Capitoline temple was built by the kings and completed +by the first consuls; it was then consumed by fire +in the time of Sulla, but was restored and consecrated by +Catulus. It was burnt down a second time under Vitellius, +after which Vespasian rebuilt it with great splendour. +Twelve years later, fire again broke out in an unaccountable +manner, and Domitian restored it a third time. +The immense splendour lavished upon it was probably +the principal cause of its subsequent total destruction; +it is scarcely possible to form any idea of its costly +ornaments: the gates were of bronze covered with thick +and solid plates of wrought gold. This gilding alone is +said to have cost more than two millions sterling. Even +the tiles which Genseric carried away were gilt.⁠<a id="FNanchor_18" href="#Footnote_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</a>⁠</p> + +<p>All ancient temples consist of two main parts, the cella +and the space in front of the cella. The latter might be +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_68">[68]</span>constructed in different ways, it might be sheltered by a +roof, or exposed to the open air, in which case it was +enclosed by four walls or a portico all around. We generally +imagine the altar to have been in the temple itself; in the +ancient Christian churches (<i>basilicae</i>) it always stood in +the <i>apsis</i>, but in the temples it did not belong to the cella +of the gods, but to the space in front of it. The cella was +generally open, but could be closed; it was usually very +small. The Roman temples often were of extremely small +dimensions, and at present I scarcely know a chapel of an +equally small size, not even in Italy, where there are some +incredibly little chapels; for there were temples of which +the cella was only seven or eight feet in diameter. The +cella contained the statue of the god (τὸ ἕδος), and for +this reason it was necessary to have the altar outside in the +centre of the space in front of the cella, which was either +exposed to the open air, or could easily be aired, because +the statue, in consequence of the burnt sacrifices, might +have become disfigured by smoke or otherwise, and because +the bones and the like might easily have created foul +air in the cella and thus produced injurious effects. In +the temple of the Capitoline Jupiter, the cella was divided +into three sacella, separated by walls, for Jupiter, Juno, +and Minerva. But this cella was only the smallest part of +the building; the larger was the space before it, where the +ordinary donaria were hung up, except the more precious +gifts, which were kept in the favissae, or large catacombs +under the temple in the lautumiae. It is possible that +they might still be discovered; a few traces of them are +visible in the garden of duke Caffarelli. In the twelfth +century, under Pope Anacletus II., large ruins still existed; +but a church was erected upon them, which bore the name +<i>S. Salvatoris in maximis</i> (supply <i>ruinis</i>), but has been destroyed +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_69">[69]</span>long ago. Such names must always be attended to, for +they often lead to important discoveries. The heaps of +rubbish lying below by the side of the river, belong no +doubt to the temple, and if excavations were made, many +valuable treasures might be discovered. I often proposed +in vain to dig in the favissae, but as I have given some +impulse, I hope people will be roused from their indifference.⁠<a id="FNanchor_19" href="#Footnote_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a>⁠</p> + +<p>The hills not only had the same extent which they still +have, but must have extended much further at the time when +the valleys were more distinct. Thus a part of the Forum, +properly speaking, belonged to the Capitoline hill. The +<i>carcer</i> was at the north-eastern extremity; its construction +is ascribed to Ancus Marcius, the founder of the plebeian +order; it seems to have been intended for the plebeians, +for the patricians would probably not have tolerated the +idea of such a thing.</p> + +<p>The <i>Forum</i> was situated below the Capitoline hill, between +it and the Palatine. This is the real point from +which the reform of the topography of Rome must proceed, +for point by point can be established by the aid of the +ancient authors. I there made the beginning of some +happy discoveries, which, however, were not continued, +because those who have it in their power to grant permission, +are afraid lest their arbitrary assertions should be +overturned. Materials are not wanting, and many have +undertaken the task, but a singular misfortune seems to +hang over these things. In the earlier times this part of +Roman topography was sadly bungled, even by most +excellent men, and Nardini proceeded in quite a wrong +way. He is one of those who, with great industry but +insufficient learning, produced very little; he did not understand +Greek, but helped himself by means of Latin +translations, whence he often commits the strangest blunders. +Notwithstanding his great diligence, he has not only produced +bad and perverse results, but has done positive +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_70">[70]</span>harm by making posterity acquiesce in his conclusions, +for, until our own days, it was the prevalent opinion that +he had settled every point, and people were satisfied with +having read Nardini. Hence his work has been translated +into Latin and incorporated in the “Thesaurus Antiquitatum +Romanorum.” There were only few able men that +were not misled by his authority, and ventured upon independent +investigations after him, such as Ficoroni, though +he entered only into special points. I knew at Rome a +bookseller, a respectable and unassuming person, whose +business was stopped for no other reason but because he +had disregarded the authority of Nardini. Morelli, an +excellent Italian, has written a treatise on the decay of +scholarship in Italy, in which he makes a witty application +of the scriptural expression, “Ablatum ab Israel, translatum +ad gentes,” telling his countrymen, that they have to +learn their own antiquities from foreigners, and that philology +in Italy is at an end. This is not indeed quite true, +but the Italians are not sure in their own minds, they are +often influenced by a certain feeling of uneasiness, and do +not possess calm confidence. An honest inquirer need not +despond; he does not mind owning that he has been +mistaken, for who is exempt from it! Whoever makes +great pretensions without having corresponding abilities, +becomes unfaithful to truth, and will endeavour to crush +and calumniate others, in order to preserve for himself +dictatorial influence. Such is the case of Fea. Roman +topography, as I have said before, was brought by Nardini +to a stand still which lasted more than a century and +a half. Zoëga too has made inquiries into it: being +a Dane he is almost a countryman of mine, and I do not +undervalue his learning; but if his works were written at +the present time, the true scholars of Germany would not +be a little surprised, for he was entirely deficient in real +grammatical knowledge. He directed his mind and attention +to things about which a healthy philology does not +concern itself, such as the Egyptian mysteries and the like. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_71">[71]</span>His reading was uncommonly extensive, but he had little +scholarship, and owing to this he will be forgotten. He +had examined the antiquities of Rome, and had read all +the books upon them, but formed no sound conception of the +ancient city. Nardini was quite aware that the Forum was +the heart of Rome, both topographically and politically, but +he unfortunately took an entirely wrong direction; instead +of making the buildings succeed one another on the left, +he makes them follow on the right, and puts in juxtaposition +those which belong to different periods. Hence his +confusion; his view of ancient Rome is altogether false. I have +gained the right point of view in a peculiar way, and am +quite certain of its correctness. I will relate the matter +to you as an example of a thread in a labyrinth. Pliny +states that, before sun-dials were known at Rome, the +parts of the day, sunrise, noon, and sunset were cried out. +But the Romans did not calculate according to the moment +when the sun really set, but from the moment when +the sun was no longer visible in the Forum. By this +means it was determined as to whether an act had taken +place at the right time or not, for the Romans were +very exact in such trifles. Now in the Forum the +sun became invisible about three minutes before the real +sunset; the crier called out from the Curia, and at the +different seasons of the year stated, when he had seen the +sun. I have been on the spot innumerable times, and knew +the district as well as I knew my own room; I sought the +place where the Curia must have stood, and made experiments +by watching the sun from that point at the different +seasons of the year. By this means I obtained the advantage +of certainty in regard to the whole side near the Palatine. +Having once found the Curia Hostilia, I had at the same time +the Comitium⁠<a id="FNanchor_20" href="#Footnote_20" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> and the Graecostasis. In a poem of Statius +there occurs a description of the gigantic equestrian statue +of Domitian, and the poet says that it looked towards the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_72">[72]</span>temple of Concord: the site of this statue I also succeeded +in discovering. It then happened very fortunately that +during an excavation an enormous cube was found, on +which smaller cubes had been fastened bearing pillars: this +was the identical pedestal of the equestrian statue of Domitian. +It is clear, that its base consisted of bricks with +a coating of marble; the masonry belongs to a period which +a practised eye cannot mistake, and we may assert, that +the great cubic block was built before the time of Severus, +for afterwards the masonry became quite different. In the +Monumentum Ancyranum of Augustus, the author, in +speaking of a basilica, mentions that a temple of Castor was +adjoining it; and this temple I discovered with the assistance +of Statius. Its site is a subject of great difficulty, +for according to the Monumentum Ancyranum, it was +adjoining the basilica Julia, whereas it is commonly supposed +to have been situated on the other side; but I knew +from Ovid⁠<a id="FNanchor_21" href="#Footnote_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a>⁠, that it was at the end of the Forum, and in +this manner the whole Forum was made out.</p> + +<p>Respecting the extent of the Roman Forum equally +erroneous notions are current, because not only the district +occupied by the ancient Forum, but the whole valley far +and wide, up to the eminence from which the Via Sacra +came down, has several times been covered with rubbish. +This whole district is now called Campo Vaccino, and +Andreas Fulvius and Bartholomaeus Marliani imagined that +all this space, from the Capitol to the arch of Titus, was +occupied by the Forum. People were the more tempted to +assume this extent, as they entertained the most exaggerated +notions about the population and magnitude of the city, +as is the case, e.g., in Lipsius’ book, “De Magnitudine Urbis +Romae.” He believes that Rome extended north as far as +Civita Castellana, a distance of from thirty-five to forty +English miles; for he imagined that the numbers of the +census under the first emperors were those of the inhabitants +of the city, whereas they embraced the whole body +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_73">[73]</span>of citizens, and accordingly amounted to millions. Nothing +can be more senseless than what Lipsius has written on this +subject; the exaggerations are enormous: sometimes he was +misled by appearances, but sometimes he has not even this +excuse. The Forum, in comparison with the present +Campo Vaccino, was small, and in all our maps it is pushed +too far towards the Capitol. It was situated between the +Tarpeian and the Palatine, but did not occupy the whole +length of the Capitoline; the triumphal arch of Septimius +Severus stood beside, and not in, the Forum.</p> + +<p>The first question here is as to the distinction between +the Forum and the <i>Comitium</i>. In the earliest times they +were as different as the populus was from the plebs: the +Comitium being the place of assembly for the curiae (patricians), +and the Forum the original market-place, in which, +however, the plebeians met for the purpose of voting. The +Comitium has been the subject of endless discussions and +controversies, but most of the opinions about it are quite +foolish. Things went so far that Nardini gained immense +applause from the <i>imperiti</i> when he declared that the Comitium +was the building of which three pillars are still standing: +but these pillars belong to the Curia Julia. The Comitium +was no building at all, it was nothing but an open place, +and a part of the Forum in its wider sense. Both the +Forum and the Comitium are parts of the same plain; at a +later time the Comitium, in every-day language, was included +in the word Forum, and there can be no doubt that the +portico surrounding the Forum also inclosed the Comitium. +The <i>rostra</i> formed the separation between the two. It is +difficult to give you an accurate idea of the rostra, for we +have no word conveying an adequate notion. Imagine a +<i>suggestum</i> about twelve feet in breadth and at least thirty in +length; imagine this to be of the height of a full-grown +man, perhaps even somewhat higher, and on both sides +steps leading up to it. I should never have been able to +form a correct notion of it, had it not been for the fortunate +accident, that just during my residence at Rome the new +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_74">[74]</span>rostra were excavated. No person recognised it or understood +what it was; I was not inclined to enter into a dispute, +but only took my friend, De Serre, the greatest orator of +the present time, to see the spot, where if he had lived in +ancient times, he would have achieved as great a reputation +as any other. The inner kernel only remains, which is +constructed of beautiful bricks and cement. The outside +was probably, or I may say certainly, covered with marble, +and the beaks of the ships (<i>rostra navium Antiatum</i> or +<i>Antiatium</i>) were walled in in the front. So long as I had +no correct notion of the rostra, I could not understand the +meaning of the words <i>statuae in rostris positae</i>; it is only +on such an extensive platform that they could be set up. +Such a space is quite natural if we bear in mind the animated +character of southern oratory, in which the speaker +is in constant communication with those around him. One +may still see this. There was at Rome a highly respectable +monk who preached every Sunday, and during +Lent, daily, in the Colosseum. He stood in the open air, +and walked up and down as if he were conversing with his +hearers. I think I never heard a sermon that made a deeper +impression: sometimes he stood still, and sometimes he went +from one to another of his hearers, without, however, calling +any one by his name. It is this active communication +with the audience that produced the <i>percussio laterum</i>; if +a man, standing on a small platform, were to do this often, +he would become ridiculous. At Athens, the case was +different; the orators there did not move about so much, +and the βῆμα seems to have been smaller; I have not +indeed found any passage about it in the ancients, but I +infer it from the locality; and according to the descriptions +we have of it, it seems that it could not have been otherwise. +Upon the rostra, at Rome, the statues stood <i>in loco +aprico et conspicuo</i>. In the most ancient language, this +platform was called <i>templum</i>, and the new name arose in +417, from the beaks of the ships, with which the front was +adorned. I have often been on that spot, and often stood in +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_75">[75]</span>the Roman Forum: who will describe the emotions that +rise in one’s breast on a spot where Tiberius spoke upon +Augustus, and other relations upon Germanicus (for these +rostra are not the most ancient), where all the funeral +orations upon the emperors were delivered, and where all +great solemnities took place! And how wretched, how +bare, and how stripped is that spot of all its splendour! +Before you, you have Rome and its most ancient monuments, +the career of Ancus Marcius; on the other side, the +place once occupied by the temple of Concord, which +Camillus built after having appeased the plebs: the lacus +Servilius, where in the days of Sulla the heads of the proscribed +were stuck up; the site of the temples of Castor and +Vesta, and the Capitoline district: to such a place one can +always return with a feeling of reverence; there one may +imbibe the inspiration for writing the history of ancient times, +and there one becomes familiar with it. The most ancient +rostra were, no doubt, constructed of peperino. According to +Plutarch, C. Gracchus transferred the real sovereignty to the +people, by turning towards the Forum and the commonalty, +instead of facing the Comitium where the patricians and +the senate stood. Until then it had been customary for the +orator, even when communicating something to the plebeians, +to turn towards the patricians: but Gracchus turned round, +and thus symbolically threw off the mask which he had +worn until then. The present level of the Forum is +about twenty-five or twenty-six feet higher than in ancient +times.</p> + +<p>The <i>Curia Hostilia</i> was situated on the πρόπους of the +Palatine, just opposite the narrow side of the rostra. Its name +is no doubt derived from Tullus Hostilius, who is certainly +an historical personage; but we ought not to assert that he +reigned from <span class="allsmcap">A.U.</span> 78 till 110, for no one can know when +he lived. This Curia existed down to the time of Cicero, +when the populace led on by Sext. Clodius, carried into it +the body of P. Clodius, who had been killed by Milo, and, +in burning the corpse, reduced the building to ashes. Even +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_76">[76]</span>Sulla had made some alterations in the district around the +rostra, but we do not know in what they consisted. The Curia +was not restored on the ancient site, but farther to the right; +Caesar commenced the new building, and Augustus completed +it: this is the <i>Curia Julia</i>, near which the new rostra +were constructed. The three splendid Corinthian columns +which are still standing, belong to this Curia Julia; they +stand parallel to the ridge of the Palatine and the line of the +Capitoline, and are generally considered to have belonged to +the temple of Jupiter Stator, while Fea believes them to be +remnants of the temple of Castor. This latter hypothesis is +impossible, for we read in Suetonius⁠<a id="FNanchor_22" href="#Footnote_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a> that the arch of Caligula +extended over the temple of Castor as far as the Capitol: +but this is impossible, if the three columns belonged to the +temple of Castor. They belong, I repeat it, to the Curia +Julia; and this accounts for the fact that the rostra are +found close by, and that the Capitoline Fasti, which formed +one wall in that Curia, were found among its ruins. There +can be no doubt that the very ancient plan of Rome,⁠<a id="FNanchor_23" href="#Footnote_23" class="fnanchor">[23]</a> which +formed the floor of the church S. Cosma e Damiano, likewise +belonged to it: there could not be a better place for it +than one of the walls in the Curia Julia. The idea of Pirro +Ligorio, that the Fasti were set up in an arch, is as improbable +as many others of his views; attempts have been made to +justify him, but he has evidently been guilty of many falsehoods. +Notwithstanding this, however, his papers ought +not to be neglected; they are preserved partly in the +Vatican and partly among the manuscripts at Turin.⁠<a id="FNanchor_24" href="#Footnote_24" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> Rome, +accordingly, had two Curiae, the Hostilia and Julia, which, +however, did not exist at any time simultaneously; but the +two rostra, the <i>vetera</i> and the <i>nova</i> or <i>Julia</i>, both existed at +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_77">[77]</span>the same time. The <i>nova rostra</i> were built on the site of +the ancient Curia.</p> + +<p>The whole of the Forum was surrounded by a portico, +which had been built either in the time of the kings or at +the commencement of the republic; the columns were +undoubtedly Etruscan, that is, old Doric, and the whole +was made of peperino, covered with stucco, and not high. +The booths (<i>tabernae</i> or <i>mensae argentariorum</i>), the stalls of +money-changers or bankers, were set up in this portico to +be protected against the weather. The armour taken from +an enemy after a glorious victory was hung upon the +pillars, whence the expression <i>postes ornare tropaeis</i> in one +of the fragments of Ennius. Whether these trophies were +carefully preserved, is unknown; but the old ones probably +made room for new ones, though many a splendid memorial +may have been seen there for a long time. In the Forum, +below the Capitol, but beyond the clivus, were the temples +of Saturn and Concord; further, when you look southward, +having the Capitoline on the right and the Palatine +on the left, you have on your right-hand side the temple of +Castor, which was dedicated by the dictator A. Postumius; +near it was the well of Juturna, in which the Dioscuri, after +the battle of lake Regillus, washed their horses; next to it +was the temple of Vesta, of which remains would certainly +be found, if excavations were made; distinct mention of it +is made in books written as late as the fifteenth century. +On the opposite side was situated the Regia and the Atrium +Vestae, which ought not to be confounded with the temple of +that goddess. Rome contained many Atria, that is, open +square spaces surrounded by houses and a portico, under +which people walked in rainy weather. Such was the +Atrium Libertatis, a kind of <i>bourse</i>; the most correct Latin +name for a <i>bourse</i> or exchange accordingly would be <i>atrium +negotiatorum</i> or <i>mercatorum</i>. The Atrium Vestae must have +been like the cloisters of a monastery, the cells of the +Vestals being built around a square; the priestesses moreover +were buried beside the Atrium, as they had the privilege of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_78">[78]</span>being buried within the city. This circumstance has +caused great confusion in the antiquities of Rome, for when +in the sixteenth century the church of S. Maria Liberatrice +was erected on the left-hand side of the Atrium Vestae, and +a number of tomb-stones of Vestal virgins were found there, +it was inferred at once that this must be the site of the +temple of Vesta. But this is opposed to all the statements +of the ancients. I think it was one of my friends who had +the happy idea that the temple ought not to be sought near +the Atrium; I had previously said, that I could not believe +the temple to have been there, and that, from all accounts, +I must infer that it stood on the opposite side, not far +from the lacus Curtius.</p> + +<p>The Forum contained yet another class of buildings; it +certainly was a market-place as well as a place for assembling; +but in ancient times it was also the place for the administration +of justice. In like manner, our own ancestors +met under the open sky, and the estates of Lüneburg, as +late as 1660, assembled in a forest, because decrees formed +in a covered building were considered invalid. Such also +was the case at Rome, all business was transacted in the +open air. This is the native and natural custom of Italy: +man there feels the necessity of living and doing his work +under the free canopy of heaven; every artizan, if the +weather permits it, works in front of his house where he has his +shop. There still exist at Rome a great many houses built +in exactly the same style as in the most ancient times. +These shops have no windows, but are closed by means of a +large door; and in bad weather the people take refuge +within and work by candle-light; when the weather +becomes fine again, they resume their seats in the door +or in the street. Such also was the case with the ancients. +Those who worked with their minds, had similar arrangements: +during the night they remained in their rooms, but +in the day-time they walked out into the open air, to some +public place where they dictated or wrote. The air at Rome +is very good, if we consider the dress of the ancients, which +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_79">[79]</span>consisted of wool, over which they wore the toga; the climate +is more healthy than ours, and old age there commences later +than with us. Justice, as I said before, was administered +in the Forum in the open air; but as this was not without +its disadvantages, it became necessary to devise some protection +against them. When the Romans had become +acquainted with Greece, they were much pleased with the +στοὰ βασίλειος at Athens, and the idea of building <i>basilicae</i> +suggested itself to them. The Stoa at Athens was probably +a portico composed of several rows (we do not know how +long these rows were), and afforded both sufficient light +and protection in bad weather. When, therefore, an active +intercourse between Rome and Greece had arisen, the +Romans built such basilicae as courts of justice. They are +by no means imitations of royal palaces of the East. Later +Greeks, e.g., Agathias, always translate the word basilicae, +whether at Rome or at Constantinople, by στοὰ βασίλειος. +We must conceive that originally they were mere rows of +columns supporting a roof, and without side-walls. They +generally had six rows of columns in front, so that there +were five entrances. Afterwards the two extreme rows, +the first and sixth, were changed into walls; the back part +also was walled up, and the tribunal for the presiding +praetor was set up in a crescent formed in this back wall. +This is the origin of the closed buildings called basilicae. +As they were well adapted for public meetings, they became, +ever since the time of Constantine, the regular types of +Christian churches. What was the construction of churches +before the time of Constantine, is a question which we +cannot answer; we do not possess the slightest allusion to +it. An immense number of fables are current respecting +churches said to have been built by Constantine, but the +only one which he really did build, is still known; it is the +church of the Lateran, justly called <i>princeps ecclesiarum +urbis et orbis</i>. The day on which that church was consecrated +by Constantine, is quite certain, and is celebrated +every year, I believe about the end of November. The +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_80">[80]</span>import of this festival of the consecration of the Church has +at Rome itself been completely forgotten, and there is not +one canon of the Lateran who knows it. I have learned +it from an old Flemish gentleman, who, among much that +was strange, also possessed a good deal of interesting information. +The form of the basilicae, as I have described it, is +very ancient, and in the Christian churches it is quite +simple: all have five gates, and in the interior, four rows of +columns, the two inner ones high, and the outer ones lower. +This change, however, was not a matter of necessity. From +this form I recognised the <i>basilica C. et L. Caesarum</i>, <i>Julia</i>, or +<i>Caesaris</i> in what is commonly called the temple of Concord.</p> + +<p>In the course of time the Forum became quite filled with +basilicae, monuments, statues, and the like; it contained +three or four basilicae, the Opimia, Porcia, Paulli, etc. +Caesar set up a number of statues, so that during the latter +period of the republic there was little space left for public +assemblies, which, however, even without this, were rarely +held; the idea of a free space must in the end have been entirely +forgotten, and the comitium alone preserved this character. +About sixty years ago, the pavement of the Comitium consisting +of slabs of the most beautiful yellow Numidian +marble, was discovered, but it was broken to pieces and +sold in a disgraceful manner. In later times all the edifices +were rebuilt, and the portico was restored with far more +splendour (we know this from Orosius) and floored with +magnificent stones, while the roof was of bronze and no +doubt gilt.</p> + +<p>This may suffice in regard to the Forum Romanum or +Maximum. The word Forum originally, as is stated by +the ancient lexicographers, signified “hollow ground;” +but afterwards it assumed the same meaning as ἀγορά, and +thus presupposes an open space. In later times the meaning +underwent so strange a change, that the Fora, e.g., +the Forum Ulpium or Trajani, were not open spaces at all, +but places wholly covered with buildings. Of the same +kind were the Fora of Nerva and Domitian. The same +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_81">[81]</span>must be supposed to have been the case even with the +Forum of Caesar; in regard to that of Augustus, it may +appear doubtful, as to whether a portion of it was not an +open space. This change arose from the fact, that the idea +of a free space, in the case of the Forum Maximum, was +entirely lost sight of, and a Forum was regarded as a place +containing courts of justice.</p> + +<p>As, therefore, the ancient Forum was already filled +with basilicae, Caesar, wishing to build a handsome one, +erected it in a separate locality, which he purchased by the +side of the Forum. This is the <i>Forum Caesaris</i>, which was +not an open space at all, but a basilica with the temple of +Venus Genitrix. It was situated at the foot of the Palatine, +by the side of the Forum Maximum, its southern part turning +towards the Vicus Tuscus, opposite the temple of Castor, +as I have ascertained beyond a doubt. I cannot give you +the proofs, because I have neither maps nor plans at hand.</p> + +<p>The next <i>Forum</i> planned in the same manner is that of +<i>Augustus</i>, except that a portion of it was probably an open +space. It was situated at some distance from the Roman +Forum, beyond the Via Sacra and, perhaps, a few more +streets. Hirt, who is himself not rich in ideas, but in Roman +topography has often successfully revived those of earlier +writers (such as Palladio and Serlio), has demonstrated the +site of this Forum. He is not a learned man, but has a +well practised eye in observing antiquities; none of his own +original views are good, but among the things he finds in +earlier authors, he can well distinguish what is correct from +what is not, a thing which learned men often cannot. The +Forum of Augustus contained the temple of Mars Ultor, +where the standards of Crassus, recovered from the Parthians, +were set up, and also a magnificent basilica; there +also stood—it was a noble conception—the statues of the +most illustrious Romans, which had formerly stood in the +market-place and in the orchestra of the theatre, with the +<i>tituli gestorum</i>. A fragment of the latter is still extant +fastened in a wall of the Vatican; but it is not even possible +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_82">[82]</span>to see whose name is mentioned in it. The writing certainly +belongs to the age of Augustus, as every one can see who +has an eye for such things. I cannot be mistaken in such +a matter, I can immediately see whether an inscription was +cut before the time of Caesar or in the age of Augustus. +Such things make a residence at Rome so pleasing, when +on seeing monuments one can immediately determine to +what period they belong. The inscriptions, however, are +still extant in copies, as for instance, at Pesaro. About a +Roman mile from Tivoli, I found an overturned pedestal +of a statue of Plancus, with an inscription, which had been +quite rudely cut by a common mason, probably an ignorant +slave. I was not able to convince a native of Tivoli, who +even wrote on the antiquities of his own town, that such +inscriptions are genuine.</p> + +<p>The Forum Augusti is now foolishly called Forum +Nervae, probably because it is situated near the latter; +while down to the seventeenth century its ruins were regarded +as part of the Forum Trajani. The <i>Forum Nervae</i> +was very easy to be recognised by a temple built by Nerva +and dedicated by Trajan, but the ruins of it were formerly +believed to belong to the temple of Mars Ultor. Among +these ruins there were six or eight columns, which unfortunately +were lying on the ground, in consequence of which +they were cut in pieces by Pope Paul V., who made use of +the beautiful marble in building an aqueduct (<i>Acqua Paola</i>). +This circumstance was so quickly forgotten that Nardini, +who wrote only about forty or fifty years later, was perfectly +ignorant of a temple having ever stood there, and +that after him no modern ever even thought of it. All that +was known of this temple of Nerva, was transferred to that +of Mars Ultor. I discovered this fact from the work of +Gamucci, an author of the sixteenth century, who gives a +minute account of it, and representations of the ruins in +woodcuts. I saw that three columns of exquisite beauty, +which were generally referred to the temple of Mars Ultor, +could be no other than those which he assigned to the Forum +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_83">[83]</span>of Trajan. I also found copper-plate engravings of the +fifteenth or sixteenth century, and made out quite clearly, +that those columns were not what they were believed to be, +and that the space of the Forum Nervae was covered with +houses by Cardinal Alessandrini, under Paul V.</p> + +<p>By the side of the Forum Augusti, another was built by +Domitian, which was called <i>Forum Nervae</i> or <i>Palladium</i>, +because he erected a temple of Pallas in it; architraves and +disfigured columns (<i>colonnacce</i>) of it still exist. The Palladium +is also seen represented in reliefs. But Domitian’s +name, as I have already observed, being detested by posterity, +it afterwards obtained the name of Forum Nervae, +for Nerva dedicated the temple of which the building had +been commenced by Domitian.</p> + +<p>The most magnificent of all the Fora was the <i>Forum Ulpium</i>, +between the Capitoline and Quirinal, a whole complex +of buildings, the splendour of which was unequalled by +anything; as is seen even from the trifling remains which +have escaped destruction during the middle ages. Its +centre was adorned with the column of Trajan which made +the destructiveness of the barbarians quail. By barbarians, +I do not mean the Germans, for Goths and Vandals did not +destroy buildings, but I allude to the feudalism of the +middle ages, when all strong buildings were occupied as +fortresses. Thus the senator Brancaleone knew no more +expeditious way than to raze to the ground one hundred +and forty ancient edifices, because they had been used as +fortresses: such things happened at the time of the emperor +Frederick II.⁠<a id="FNanchor_25" href="#Footnote_25" class="fnanchor">[25]</a>⁠, and if it were not for this barbarism the +buildings might be still standing. The marble was used +as lime, as was done even at the time when I lived in Rome, +for an ancient street was then broken down for the convenience +of a high road, and specimens of the most beautiful +architecture were burnt down at Ostia into lime.</p> + +<p>In regard to the name Forum Ulpium, you must remember +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_84">[84]</span>that adjectives of gentile names were taken, without +change, from the primary adjective form, provided they +applied to architectural works, whence <i>Forum Ulpium</i> and +not <i>Ulpianum</i>, <i>Curia Julia</i> and not <i>Juliana</i>; when applied +to writings and other works, however, the adjectives take +the ending <i>anus</i>, as <i>orationes Tullianae</i>. Near the gigantic +column of Trajan there were two basilicae of immense +magnitude, and also two other large buildings, one of which, +at least, contained a library. Statues of the most illustrious +men were then set up in these basilicae, as they had formerly +been in the Forum Augusti; this was the greatest honour that +could be shown to a man, and the custom was preserved +down to the latest times of the empire; the statues of Merobaudes, +Sidonius Apollinaris, Claudian, and others, were +found among the ruins of those basilicae. I recommend you +to read Sidonius Apollinaris; I will not set up my authority +in this matter as of much value, but J. M. Gesner calls Sidonius +Apollinaris a <i>vir magnus</i>, although he is an incorrect writer. +But he is a man of such genius and talent, that his equal +is not easily to be met with in the course of centuries. He +has something that reminds one of modern French authors; +but in regard to his mind, he is thoroughly an ancient of +the time when the night of barbarism was threatening to +sink down upon mankind.</p> + +<p>These are the real Fora. There can be no doubt, that +the basilica of Antoninus Pius stood in the Piazza Colonna, +where the façade of the columns is still preserved. What +a pity that everything is now so much destroyed! for as late +as the sixteenth century, there still existed in that place the +pedestals of a number of allegorical statues representing +the Roman provinces; some of them have been recovered +though not recognised, but most of them have disappeared. +I have not seen one of them, and have read only +the notice that some have been found. Provincial coins of +Antoninus Pius also exist showing on the one side the +emperor’s head, and on the other the name of a province, +as Gallia, Bithynia, etc. That locality therefore seems to +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_85">[85]</span>have been the <i>Forum Aurelium</i>, which, however, is not +mentioned in the Regionaria, because it was outside the +city.</p> + +<p>Besides these, Rome had yet a different kind of Fora, +which were real market-places, for those I have hitherto +mentioned are only the splendid ones. Two of these +market-places belong to the period of ancient Rome, viz., +the <i>Forum Boarium</i> towards the Circus, and the <i>Forum +Olitorium</i> between the Capitoline and the Tiber, in the +neighbourhood of the theatre of Marcellus, where I lived +for six years. The Forum Boarium was no doubt a cattle +market, where live cattle were sold, although we have no +distinct statement to prove this; the Forum Olitorium was of +course a vegetable market. Meat, however, was not sold +in the Forum Boarium, but in the <i>macellum</i> which contained +the butchers’ stalls. In Greece, butchers’ shops were +unknown; people there ate so little meat, that it was never +bought or sold in the market at Athens; for they ate meat +only when they themselves killed an animal, that is, when +they sacrificed. On such an occasion an entertainment was +given on account of the meat, whence θύειν is synonymous +with “to give an entertainment.” Otherwise both the rich +and poor at Athens lived as frugally as the modern Greeks +on anchovies, the tunny fish, salt fish, salad, fruit, and +olives; many a man in easy circumstances ate nothing all +day except some olives with bread and without sitting down +to a regular meal. This is the λιτὴ τράπεζα Ἀττικὴ mentioned +by Athenaeus as opposed to Macedonian luxury. The +Roman mode of living, on the other hand, was very like +our own; the Romans took a great deal of meat, especially +ham, like the German peasantry, bacon and other salt meat; +they did not require a sacrifice to feast their friends. One +of their principal dishes was a kind of porridge made of +spelt; it is a very excellent dish and affords most healthy +nourishment. For children, I know nothing better than +this porridge with milk, on which I have brought up my +own. There can be no doubt that oxen were sold in the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_86">[86]</span>Forum Boarium, though there is a statement that it derived +its name from a brazen bull which stood there.</p> + +<p>There are a few other names in Roman topography +which may be easily mistaken. One of them is <i>vicus</i>. +Many years ago, before I had gone to Rome, a gentleman +engaged in archaeological studies said to me, that it was +utterly impossible to define what <i>vicus</i> meant. If by this +he meant to say, that a vast deal had been written about +it without making the matter clearer, he was quite right. +But the cause of this was the base of a statue belonging to +the period of the first emperors.⁠<a id="FNanchor_26" href="#Footnote_26" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> Each region of Augustus +was subdivided into <i>vici</i>, which means nothing else but a +quarter or district under the superintendence of its own +police officer. Even at a much earlier time the regions of +Servius Tullius had been similarly subdivided, in the city +into <i>vici</i>, and in the country into <i>pagi</i>, and each had its +own <i>magister</i>. The word <i>vicus</i> may be rendered by the +German <i>Wik</i>, or <i>Wich</i>; in ancient times, many towns in +lower Saxony were divided into <i>Wiks</i>. Now as it happened +by accident that sometimes a single street constituted +such a vicus, and as of course the houses on both sides of +the street belonged to it, such a street was naturally called +a vicus, as, for example, the <i>vicus Sceleratus</i>. The <i>vicus +Patricius</i> and the <i>vicus Cornelius</i>, on the other hand, are +obviously larger districts in the regio Collina and Esquilina. +I think (I may be mistaken, but I believe I am right) that +in the Regionaria every region of Augustus was regularly +divided into seven vici. Many a street at Rome is called +<i>vico</i> to this day, and a narrow lane is called <i>vicolo</i>, which, +however, is only a secondary meaning.</p> + +<p>The word <i>platea</i> is likewise one of those which may +mislead, and of which only vague notions are current. The +general opinion, I believe, is, that platea signifies a broad +street on account of its derivation from the Greek πλατεῖα; +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_87">[87]</span>but it is something else; it is what we call <i>place</i> or <i>piazza</i>. +In the early times of Rome the name does not seem to +have been used; it occurs only at a later period, when an +intercourse was established with Greece. We have to +understand by it a wide open space, such as we have in +front of many large buildings; but not a market-place. +The authority which has enabled me to establish this as the +real meaning of the word, shows how necessary it is for an +historical philologer not to limit his reading: for I know +it from several passages of St. Augustin’s work, “De +Civitate Dei.” St. Augustin, one of the greatest minds, +ought to be recommended on account of his intellect, +and independently of any historical information which +his works may furnish; his genius is a mighty one, and +was extremely developed in that agitated period, which +forms the boundary line between the ancient and modern +world. In his account of the conquest of Rome by the +Goths, which he gives merely in passing, there are passages +from which it is quite evident that <i>platea</i> is a space such as +I have described before. These are generally speaking, the +only open spaces which Rome, after its rebuilding since the +middle ages, now possesses, as, for example, the Piazza di +Spagna below the Collis Hortulorum; a large place of the +size of the market-place of Bonn is scarcely to be found +at Rome.</p> + +<p>The first <i>aqueduct</i> was built by Appius Caecus during +the second Samnite war; it was very low, and for the most +part under ground. It led to the Aventine, and was intended +to provide a supply of good water to the districts +between that hill and the Tiber, which had scarcely any +water but that of the river. Water is still derived in one +place, and I believe even in two, from this aqueduct, without +most people being aware of it. It was built under +ground, because the enemies sometimes advanced to the +very neighbourhood of Rome, and might, therefore, easily +have cut off the supply of water. Afterwards the number +of aqueducts at Rome rose to fourteen. Fresh water +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_88">[88]</span>is a real blessing to the inhabitants of the south; one +must have lived there in order to comprehend that these +aqueducts were not a matter of luxury. The <i>Aqua +Marcia</i> led to the Capitol; of the <i>Aqua Virgo</i> (now Acqua +di Trevi) a large <i>specus</i> is still visible. The greatest +aqueduct was that of the emperor Claudius, which was +preserved as late as the eighth century of the Christian era; +it might easily have been restored; its arches were taken +down gradually after the restoration of Rome in the sixteenth +century, because people wanted the bricks to build +their houses.</p> + +<p>Rome had two great <i>Circuses</i> which were destined for +races, for these were the national games of the Romans from +the earliest times. The most ancient, the <i>ludi magni Romani</i>, +which were traced back to the time of Tarquinius Priscus, +were established for the patrician burgesses; but besides +these there existed, likewise, from very ancient times, <i>ludi +plebeii</i>, a very remarkable instance of the manner in which +in all Roman institutions the populus and the plebs stood +by the side of each other. Down to the latest period, these +two kinds of games were never held in the same place. In the +early times the plebeians had no share whatever in the <i>ludi +Romani</i>. In the Circus Maximus the places were assigned +to the populus according to curiae, <i>ad spectacula facienda</i>,⁠<a id="FNanchor_27" href="#Footnote_27" class="fnanchor">[27]</a> +as scaffoldings are still erected on both sides of the Corso at +the time of the races. The <i>Circus Maximus</i> may have had +its present extent from the very first, for it could not +be very small on account of the chariot races, but it was not +as high as afterwards. A greater height became necessary +when, instead of the small number of the populus and their +clients, the whole Roman people took part in the spectacle; +the plebeians may indeed not have been excluded in the +early times, but they had no places assigned to them. This +Circus between the Palatine and Aventine cannot have been +laid out before the building of the Cloacae, and the carrying +through of the Marrana, since previously the whole was a +marsh. At present the sewers must be blocked up, for +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_89">[89]</span>in digging to the depth of a few feet nothing but morass +and marshy ground appears. The splendid obelisk which +now stands before the church of the Lateran, was dug out +there as late as the sixteenth century: and there can be no +doubt that valuable treasures of art are still buried there. +The Circus occupied the whole length of the valley, now +la Via de’ Cerci. That form of it, of which we have +a description, was planned and undertaken by Caesar, and +probably completed by Augustus, for it is inconceivable +that the short duration of Caesar’s dictatorship should have +sufficed for it. It is said to have contained room for +300,000 men, the seats rising in terraces above one another +as in the Colosseum. On the outside, it presented rows of +porticoes one above the other, the lowest one being occupied +by shops or stalls. In the middle ages, the Circus Maximus +was used as a fortress.</p> + +<p>The <i>Circus Flaminius</i> must have been the place for the +plebeian games: the plebs met for its deliberations and +elections on the place of the <i>prata Flaminia</i> even before the +Circus was built, when after the abolition of the decemvirate +the ancient order of things was restored; whence the +locality appears to have been essentially plebeian. The +traces of this Circus, which can still be recognised, are +somewhat more numerous than those of the Circus Maximus, +although here, too, every thing is built over; the ancient +walls have been used as foundations only in cellars and a +few houses, whence the houses there are built in a curve or +crescent. In the middle ages, this Circus was used as a place +for rope making, whence the church in that part is called +<i>S. Catarina de’ funari</i>.</p> + +<p>These two Circuses were destined for chariot races, as the +<i>Circus Agonalis</i> was for Greek games or contests. This +latter Circus was situated on the place now called Piazza +Navona. It was built by Alexander Severus, in the form +of a Greek Stadium, which was in reality not very different +from that of a Roman Circus. All the houses there have +the strong ancient walls for their foundations, whence the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_90">[90]</span>form of the Circus is preserved, whereas in the case of the +Circus Flaminius it is lost, buildings having been erected +right across it.</p> + +<p><i>Theatres</i>, in the Greek sense of the term, were not numerous +at Rome. In early times there even existed a +censorial interdict forbidding the erection of a permanent +theatre for plays; and when about the end of the sixth +century an attempt was made to break through this regulation, +the censors ordered a theatre, which had been built, +to be pulled down. This was a terrible piece of pedantry, +and a scrupulous adherence to ancient customs for which +there was no good reason at all. Plays, therefore, were +performed before the people in the Circus or in the Forum +on temporary stages, which were erected with the greatest +extravagance; the aediles were obliged to give spectacles +in order to gain popularity, and the actors had to be paid. +Subsequently the first and almost only theatre was built by +Augustus, and called after young Marcellus, his sister’s son. +Pompey had indeed erected a theatre a few years before, +but it does not appear to have been kept for the purpose +for which it was built. About one-third of the theatre +of Marcellus became the property of the house of Savelli, +who made it a fortress; it was then pulled down and +rebuilt as a palace. When the family of the Savelli became +impoverished, the palace passed into the hands of the +Orsini. I have lived in it for six years, and know every +corner of it well: the Doric story below and the Ionic +above still exist, but upon them enormous blocks of stone +and rubbish are accumulated; the cellars still exist with +their vaults and are inhabited. By the side of it there is +an immense mound of rubbish, and close by my residence +seventy-two steps led up to a garden, which is at the top. +The house contains rooms built in the ancient fashion of +about the end of the sixteenth century.</p> + +<p>The idea of <i>amphitheatres</i> arose in Italy at an early period. +Until then, all gymnastic games, and even the contests of +gladiators and wild beasts (of which the humane Greeks +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_91">[91]</span>knew nothing) were held in the same locality in which also +the more national chariot-races and the Hellenic games took +place, that is, in the Circus. But this was connected with +great disadvantages and inconveniences: the form of the +Circus was very well adapted to races, for in them it made +no difference where a person sat, whether at the beginning or +at the end of the course, for the starting as well as the arrival +at the goal had its interest for the connoisseur. But when +a contest took place on a definite spot, the immense length +of the Circus rendered it a matter of importance as to where +a person sat. The Circus can scarcely be said to have +formed an ellipsis, it was in reality an irregular figure, +which cannot be described with mathematical precision, the +length being disproportionately great in comparison with +the breadth. The idea then occurred to the Romans to +supply in some measure the place of a Greek theatre by +combining two theatres in the form of an ellipsis, so that +persons could see round the whole building, a thing for +which the Greeks had no occasion. This combination +produced the amphitheatres, which were not built at Rome +before the time of Caesar. That they are a late invention +is clear from the fact, that, in all the provincial towns of +Italy, they are, without exception, not within the walls, +but outside of them. This observation has not yet been made +by any one; and I believe I was led to it by Lami, the +excellent dean of Florence, though I may have made it +without any hint. At Rome, too, the amphitheatres were +not within the ancient city; the <i>amphitheatrum Flavium</i> +alone (the Colosseum, now called Coliseum), which was +built by Vespasian, was situated close to the Velia, and +required the purchase of a whole district. The amphitheatre +of Statilius Taurus was situated by the river-side, +where enormous ruins still exist, and where the family of +the Cenci has a palace.</p> + +<p>The amphitheatres, moreover, do not belong to the ancient +kind of architecture, but show their late origin also by a +somewhat different style. Imagine the amphitheatre intersected +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_92">[92]</span>and composed of a large number of segments, which +are broad at the periphery but narrow towards the interior, +running in the direction of an acute angle: the interior is +on all sides surrounded by these segments. Between them +are steps, by which, from the interior, persons reached +their seats; the steps are high, though not too much so, and +lead to the different terraces. At present a person may get +down even without these steps, but it is necessary to leap +from bench to bench. Great as is the perfection of ancient +buildings, yet their stairs were essentially bad, the steps +being too narrow and too high, which arose from a desire +to save space. The segments separated by the steps were +called <i>cunei</i>; the interior, or the real scene, bore the name +of <i>arena</i>. In some amphitheatres, the arena consisted of a +permanent and solid floor, whereas in others, as, for example, +in the Colosseum, the floor was not fixed: several +walls traversed it in different directions, so that boards +covered with sand could be laid upon them, in order to +absorb the blood of the gladiators: hence the name arena. +After an exhibition the boards were taken away, and +renewed at the next. Sometimes water was let in or trees +were planted in the ground, so that the place of the arena +presented the appearance of a forest: in short, a thousand +artifices were contrived. It is a circumstance which must +be borne in mind, that the arena, at least in the Colosseum +and probably in all the larger amphitheatres of all great +cities also, was moveable. Next to the arena was the first +place for persons of rank, and in front of this first row of +seats there was a canal full of water and steep embankments +to prevent the animals rushing among the spectators. In +addition to this, iron spikes were planted before the first +seat, so that even if a wild beast had leapt across the canal, +it would have run itself through with the pointed irons. +This first row of seats, which went all round, was called +<i>podium</i>, a word which, besides this technical application, +occurs only in the middle ages and in the languages derived +from the Latin, in the sense of “a hill” (Italian, <i>poggio</i>; +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_93">[93]</span>Catalonian, <i>puig</i>; Provençal, <i>puy</i>, as also in <i>Puycerda</i>, hill +of Cerda). This row contained the seats of the emperor +and the imperial family, of the nobles and the senators, for +it was spacious enough to afford room for the whole +senate. We can still with tolerable certainty determine the +place containing the imperial box.</p> + +<p>These are the most essential points in the structure of an +amphitheatre. Many things connected with the arrangements, +however, still remain obscure, and the lower part +of the Colosseum has not yet been sufficiently excavated. +It is, for example, still uncertain in what manner it was +contrived to introduce the wild beasts into the arena. All +the explanations which have been proposed are unsatisfactory. +Excavations have indeed been made, but have been +discontinued partly from a fear of weakening the building, +which point certainly is not to be overlooked, on account of +the many earthquakes, and partly on account of erroneous +suppositions, because people could not understand that the +arena was moveable. Another reason why the excavations +are not continued, is the belief that at one time there was +an altar in the arena, and that accordingly the ground is +sacred through the blood of the martyrs. Such perverse +notions are obstacles to the discovery of truth.</p> + +<p>Another amphitheatre, the <i>amphitheatrum castrense</i>, was +close to the wall; Procopius calls it <i>Vivarium</i>.</p> + +<p>I shall now proceed to speak of the <i>thermae</i>. Public +baths existed at Rome from the earliest times. Southern +countries really require them, and they were universally +used until late in the middle ages. Under Gregory I., one +of the greatest and most excellent men of his period, whose +government was distinguished for its beneficial measures, +though he did not reign as a sovereign, Rome was already +quite deserted; still, from one of his letters, I have learned +that the use of baths was then quite common. Pope +Hadrian I.,⁠<a id="FNanchor_28" href="#Footnote_28" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> likewise a very great man, restored the Aqua +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_94">[94]</span>Claudia, which had been neglected, for the purpose of supplying +the baths with water. Gregory I. states, that in his +time many people considered it sinful to bathe on a Sunday; +but he himself, who was more clear-sighted than his flock, +issued a proclamation⁠<a id="FNanchor_29" href="#Footnote_29" class="fnanchor">[29]</a> advising the people not to be so +foolish as to allow themselves to be prevented by such a +prejudice. This is a proof that baths were then still in general +use. In Germany, too, they were more common in the +middle ages than they are now. Such <i>balnea</i> or <i>balneae</i> +were very popular in ancient Rome even before the manners +of the Greeks had commenced exercising their influence. +<i>Thermae</i> (θερμαί) were first built under Augustus; but we +must not infer from this, that previously people bathed in +cold water in the city, for whenever they wished to do this, +they plunged into the Tiber. I explain the name <i>thermae</i> +in the following manner:—It had become customary at +Baiae and other watering places to combine warm baths +with the use of the mineral waters and with sea-bathing: +the life in those places was like that in our watering-places: +people frequented them for the purpose of diverting their +minds and taking care of their bodies. Greeks (commonly +called <i>Graeculi</i>) were not wanting to provide amusements +of every description with the same industry which Italians +and Frenchmen display in German watering-places. People +there threw off all cares and put aside every kind of work, +whence the Roman nobles repaired to such places every +spring. This, however, required a large fortune, for those +who had to maintain themselves by their own industry +could not afford to go to Baiae and stay there for a month. +For this reason, Augustus and Agrippa, whose object was +to keep the great body of the population in comfort and +good humour, built artificial baths as a place in the capital +itself, where the people, without travelling to Baiae, might +have similar enjoyments; just as at present mineral waters +may be enjoyed at a great distance from the springs. To +these places, then, every one who wished it, could go and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_95">[95]</span>take a bath; they contained sulphureous baths, vapour-baths, +etc., and people might lounge there without the fatigue of a +journey. The most magnificent buildings, most luxuriously +furnished, were erected for this purpose: besides the bath-rooms, +there were others, in which all kinds of amusements +were provided, such as places for the games of the time, +for games at ball, drafts, and the like, nay, even a library +existed there, as at present newspapers are kept in the +Cafés. They were accordingly, in reality, institutions to +while away leisure hours in ease and comfort, and were +peculiarly fitted to extinguish the mutinous spirit of the +people, and to tame them by the enjoyments of life. These +thermae became extremely popular, whence one emperor +after another contributed one to the number already existing +to prevent people being obliged to go to a distant +part of the city, and to provide each quarter with its own. +The thermae of Agrippa were outside the city, near the +Campus Martius and the Pantheon, for he would not +disturb any part of the city with his new institution: he +took care, by irrigation, that everything was green in the +Campus Martius during the summer, and near to the +Pantheon he ordered avenues of trees to be planted. The +thermae of Titus bear this name unjustly; the earlier +antiquarians, even as late as the fifteenth century, called +them thermae of Trajan; they existed in the Carinae +and were of quite a monstrous extent. In the middle +ages the building was called Curia Vecchia. The thermae +of Caius and Lucius Caesar in the eastern part of +the city are now quite foolishly called <i>templum Minervae +Medicae</i>. The building which now bears this name, was +nothing else than a large portico belonging to the Thermae. +There also existed thermae of Nero, Titus, Septimius +Severus, Caracalla, Alexander Severus (near those of +Agrippa), Decius, Diocletian, and Constantine, so that we +can scarcely understand how all these colossal buildings had +room within the circumference of Rome. In these thermae +some of the choicest specimens of ancient art have been +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_96">[96]</span>discovered; they contained excellent galleries of paintings, +and the most beautiful statues were set up there in the most +suitable places. If the group of the Laocoon were still +standing in the thermae of Titus, where it originally stood, +it would have a far more appropriate place than that which +it occupies at present.</p> + +<p>The <i>Palatine</i> was originally nothing but an inhabited +district like the other hills. Cicero’s house stood upon it, +and coming from the Via Sacra, one may still approximately +determine the spot where it stood. Augustus, too, lived +on the Palatine, but only as a private person. Tiberius +built another house for himself by the side of that of +Augustus, and probably inhabited it before his accession. +Caligula built a palace there in another part; but notwithstanding +this, the whole of the Palatine was full of private +dwelling-houses, and there was no other public building on +it except temples. The conflagration under Nero destroyed +all the buildings on this hill. Nero then erected a palace +on the Palatine; but not satisfied with this, he continued +it down to the Esquiliae and even up the Esquiliae. +The so-called golden house was situated between the two +hills, on a splendid spot, and extremely well chosen. But, +at a later time, we see that the imperial palace occupied +the whole of the Palatine. We must not imagine this to +have been one homogeneous and regular building, constructed +on one plan, with a large front, like our royal palaces. +Nothing is more senseless than the restorations which the +old Italian antiquarians, such as Bianchini and Panvini, +have made of this golden house: the latter has drawn +an outline of a building which never existed at all. It +is only now that the eyes of antiquarians have been +opened in regard to this subject. The whole of the +Palatine hill is covered with ruins, which have raised +its height. The lower part of the building is completely +filled with earth; and if a person wishes to investigate it, +he must break through the ground until he reaches these +vaults. They are a real labyrinth; I have been successful +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_97">[97]</span>in many points of the topography of Rome, but I have not +been able to form an idea of the imperial palace. The +excavations which were made in 1724 extended only over +a small part, but the <i>aula Domitiani</i> was then brought to +light; the outlines of an enormous hall and splendid +columns, partially preserved, belonged to this aula, and can +easily be made out; but there is also a great number of I +know not what kind of chambers: I can give you no information +about them. It would be desirable to see systematic +excavations made there. The whole district is the private +property of the king of Naples, whence the pope cannot +order excavations to be made; the ambassador of the +king had permission to do so, but he was recalled from +Rome. The palace must have existed as late as the middle +ages, perhaps until the 11th or 12th century; it was then +reduced to ashes, as is attested by the excavations, which +have shown traces of a great conflagration. In a ritual of +the coronation of the emperors belonging to the end of the +11th century, which has been printed from the original of +Cencius Camerarius,⁠<a id="FNanchor_30" href="#Footnote_30" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> we read—“When the emperor is +crowned in St. Peter, he and the empress proceed to the +<i>palatium Romanum</i>, the emperor entering the apartment of +Augustus, and the empress that of Livia.” These apartments +are correct and have been found, and the statement shows +that they were inhabited. Some fifty years ago a French +dealer in works of art made excavations there, on which +occasion many things are said to have been found, but the +place was pillaged in a most disgraceful manner. Traces of +a magnificence appeared which surpass all our conceptions: +the walls of the rooms were covered with silver plate, and +large pieces of silver texture served as tapestry; in other +palaces the walls were covered with ordinary tapestry (<i>aulaea</i>), +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_98">[98]</span>but here silver was employed instead. The treasures among +the ruins were so numerous, that even after the pillage +some things still remained.</p> + +<p>There are, properly speaking, only two streets in ancient +Rome, which are known as such, namely, the <i>Via Sacra</i> and +the <i>Subura</i>. The former began at the ridge, which extended +from the Palatine to the Esquiliae, and was called <i>Velia</i>, +known as the place where the house of P. Valerius Poplicola +stood; from this Velia it ran across the Forum, and on +the other side of the Palatine, the form of which is almost +square, it turned towards the boundary line between the +Roman and the Sabine town. We know from Varro, that +in the language of ordinary life only the first part of the +street, namely, that on the Velia, bore the name of Via +Sacra. The buildings by which it was lined were by no +means splendid; the houses which have been dug out are +very small, and no person of rank lived there; but, at the +same time, it was the street through which the processions +passed, and there were a great many statues in it. The +street, as I said before, began at the height; it passed +between the temples of Venus and Peace, and had several +triumphal arches. At the point where it touched the Forum +there stood the <i>fornix Fabianus</i>. It is possible that it may +have been the custom, even in early times, to make temporary +arches of foliage on the occasion of a triumphal +procession; but the first arch made of stone was that for +the triumph of Q. Fabius Allobrogicus. The arches still +existing are those of Titus, Septimius Severus, and that of +Constantine, which is entirely composed of stolen basreliefs; +but there were many more, as, for example, two of Trajan, +one of Valentinian and another of Gratian. They stood +in the street of the Ponte St. Angelo, and existed as late as +the middle ages; their inscriptions are preserved in copies.</p> + +<p>The <i>Subura</i> is still called by the same name. Nardini +is quite mistaken in his assertion, that the ancient Subura +was situated in a different locality, near the Lateran; no +man in his senses can admit this, for it is opposed to all +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_99">[99]</span>our evidence. We even have the express testimony of +Varro, that its site is identical with that of the present +Subura, that is, in the plain north of the Esquiliae, whence +it had the advantage of being completely built on both +sides. In it stood the house of Caesar, and in the times of +the republic the aristocracy generally lived there and in +the Carinae on the Esquiline. Afterwards, in the time of +emperors, a change took place in this respect, and every +one removed to the new quarters, whence, in the days of +Juvenal and Martial, the Subura was inhabited only by the +lowest classes; at present, too, it is the abode of poverty. +The <i>Carinae</i> were a quarter rather than a single street, in +the district of S. Pietro in Vincola. After the great fire, +Nero built a palace (not the golden house) there; and not +far from it was the palace of Titus and the thermae of +Trajan.</p> + +<p>The Quirinal had no remarkable buildings; at a later +period Aurelian erected there the temple of the Sun, the +most gigantic building in all Rome, of which vast ruins +still exist in the garden of the Colonna family. At that +time there was a taste for everything gigantic, because +architects were no longer able to produce the beautiful. +The <i>Viminal</i>, too, contained nothing worth noticing. The +Carinae, as I have already remarked, were on the <i>Esquiline</i>. +Within the walls of Servius Tullius, I know of no particularly +remarkable edifice belonging to the early period, +though it contained a large number of small temples. The +same must be said of the <i>Caelius</i> in its narrower sense; only +one arch still exists there; in the middle ages it contained +many buildings.</p> + +<p>On the rugged side of the <i>Aventine</i>, towards the river, +stood the temple of Diana, which, according to tradition, +Servius Tullius had built as a point of union for the Romans +and Latins, and in which the table containing the +ancient treaty was preserved. On the same hill there +existed the thermae of Decius and a number of other +buildings. I have already observed, that the Porta Trigemina +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_100">[100]</span>was on the Aventine towards the river. On the side +of the Palatine towards the Aventine there was a flight of +marble steps, called the <i>Scala Caci</i>; one tradition assigned it +to the Palatine, and another to the Aventine, a discrepancy +which probably arose from the opposition between the inhabitants +of the two hills.</p> + +<p>Having thus rapidly passed over the hills, I shall now +proceed further. A <i>suburb</i> was first formed between the +Palatine, Aventine, and Esquiline on the one side, and the +Tiber on the other. I have already mentioned as a part of +it the <i>Forum olitorium</i>, which was at the same time a fish-market, +and still exists unchanged. The suburb became a +thickly inhabited district, and in it Augustus built the +theatre of Marcellus and the great portico of his sister +Octavia.</p> + +<p>Another suburb extended along the Tiber as far as Ponte +Sisto at the great reach of the river, where the amphitheatre +of Statilius Taurus was situated; it occupied the whole side +of the river, which in our maps is erroneously called Campus +Martius. We generally imagine that this Campus was the only +one the Romans had; but this is a mistake, for Campi also +existed in front of other hills and gates; and like the great +Campus, they were gradually covered with houses, though +they were neither as extensive nor as important as the Campus +Martius. One of them was the <i>Campus Esquilinus</i>, in the +plain before the Esquiline beyond the agger, and the <i>Campus +Caelimontanus</i> at the foot of the Caelius (now the palace of +the Lateran) was another. These two Campi are as clear as +possible, and are frequently mentioned; their destination +was the same as that of the Campus Martius, and when in +consequence of inundations the games could not be held in +the latter, they were transferred to the Caelimontanus or the +Esquilinus. Both these Campi were national property. +Ever since the time of Augustus, houses were built in the +Campus Martius. It contained the well known <i>septa</i>, a +place fenced round, in which the centuries voted; even +Pompey had built his theatre on the very border of the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_101">[101]</span>Campus; Agrippa erected his thermae there, and his incomparably +more beautiful Pantheon; and Augustus had there +his Mausoleum, from which an avenue of trees led to the +buildings of Agrippa. Alexander Severus built there new +thermae, a circus, and several triumphal arches, so that the +Campus Martius entirely disappeared. In the second and +third century Rome extended more and more in that direction, +whence at present that part is thickly covered with +houses. Of the buildings which are found there, I have +already mentioned the thermae of Alexander Severus, the +Circus Agonalis, and the structures of Agrippa, and I shall +now say a few words about the <i>Mausoleum, of Augustus</i>. +This building formed a gigantic mass, and was as imperishable +as the pyramids. The descriptions we have of it are +very obscure, nor do its remains enable us to form an idea +of it; the drawings of its remains, which were made in +the sixteenth century, are very doubtful. A large bas-relief +may still have existed, also a water basin made of +stone, which has disappeared in an unaccountable manner; +but otherwise I believe that the drawings contain restorations. +It is said that there was also a kind of suspended +gardens with the soil artificially carried into them, but this +may be founded on some misunderstanding.</p> + +<p>The <i>mausoleum of Hadrian</i>, at present the Castel S. Angelo, +was even a much larger structure. Its restoration, which we +see in drawings, is anything but trustworthy; but there are +drawings of the fifteenth century, in which a small portion, +which was then still uninjured, is represented. At present +we still see an immense pile impregnable and inaccessible, +into which there was only one entrance like that of a cave, +with a passage leading to the burial place. There Hadrian, +Antoninus Pius, and Antoninus the philosopher were buried. +Inscriptions about it are still found in the Itinerary of +Einsiedeln, which belongs to the seventh or eighth century. +This building was used as a fort at a very early period; +Belisarius there defended himself against the Goths: the +Roman garrison consisted of Huns who hurled the statues +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_102">[102]</span>with which the building was adorned against the enemies. +It is possible that the Barberini Faun was on that occasion +thrown down, as it was found there at the time when +Urban VIII. built the fortifications. During subsequent +wars the Castel S. Angelo was often defended, as for example, +when under Crescentius the city refused to surrender +to Otho III. The greatest devastations took place in the +fourteenth century, when the Romans, who were then little +better than barbarians, wanted to level the whole structure +with the ground, because it had occasioned them great +annoyance: at that time many more inscriptions were preserved +than at present. For weeks and months they laboured +in tearing away the marble coating and the outward +ornaments, but not being able to get through they gave it +up at last. Pope Alexander VI. built some towers as means of +defence, and on that occasion the destruction was carried still +further. But after that time, three inscriptions still remained +in the sixteenth century. The present condition, which is +still imposing, is the work of Urban VIII. who made a +regular fortress of it. In order to provide it with artillery, +he caused the bronze of the vestibule of the Pantheon to be +melted and eighty cannons to be made of it, which, during +the French revolution, were carried by Murat to Naples. +The costly sarcophagi of porphyry, which belonged to the +mausoleum of Hadrian are dispersed; one of them still +exists in the palace Borghese, and another, generally called +the sarcophagus of Agrippa, probably also belonged to it. +Trajan’s ashes were contained in an urn which stood on +his column. Hence the opinion that the gilt ball on +the obelisk in front of the Circus contained the ashes of +Augustus; but this is only an erroneous opinion of the +middle ages; it was opened under Sixtus V. when the +obelisk was removed, and nothing but dust was found in it; +but how this dust had got into it, no one can tell, perhaps +it was introduced by rain. It certainly was not the ashes +of Augustus, for we know distinctly where Augustus and +his family were buried. There still exists in the Capitol a +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_103">[103]</span>very simple coffin containing the remains of Agrippina; its +side has the inscription <i>Ossa Agrippinae Germanici</i>. During +an accidental excavation near San Carlo and the Corso, a +<i>bustum</i> of the Caesars was discovered, on which their bodies +were burnt; each imperial family had a distinct place for +this purpose. At present several monumental stones of +such <i>busta</i> exist in the Museo Pio-Clementino; they always +have an inscription, such as <i>C. Caesar hic crematus +est</i>. I believe there still exist half-a-dozen of such inscriptions.</p> + +<p>Not far from the <i>moles Hadriani</i> there was a third <i>Circus</i>, +built by Nero, and by the side of it stands the church of +St. Peter. According to a tradition, the iron gate, where the +apostles Peter and Paul suffered the death of martyrs, still +exists there; but according to others, Peter died on the +Janiculus, the <i>mons aureus</i> of the middle ages. There, too, a +suburb arose as early as the time of Justinian; the church of +St. Peter attracted many inhabitants, and the place was +especially occupied by Germans, Saxons, and Lombards, +who went to Rome for devotional purposes, or were engaged +in the service of the Praefectus to defend the pope. They +had their quarters (<i>scholae</i>) there, whence the name <i>schola +Saxonum</i>, and in the same district we have the Ospidale in +Sassi. This suburb was surrounded with walls by Leo IV. +and called <i>Burgus</i> (<i>Borgo</i>).</p> + +<p><i>Trastevere</i>, on the same side of the river, though separated +by a great space, was a suburb as early as the time of +Augustus; it now contains the oldest houses in Rome, which +belong to the eleventh and twelfth centuries. Augustus had +gardens there, and during the republican period a <i>navale</i> +existed there on the south of the Aventine. On the same +bank of the river there was a <i>naumachia</i>, a district surrounded +by a wall, which could be filled with water for +mock-fights with small boats.</p> + +<p>Ancient Rome had originally only one bridge, the <i>Pons +Sublicius</i>; it consisted at first entirely of wood, and could be +taken down for the purpose of defending the city against +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_104">[104]</span>the attacks of an enemy. This bridge remained for a +long time the only one. The <i>Pons Milvius</i>, in the neighbourhood +of Rome, was likewise very ancient, but was +three Roman miles distant from the Porta Carmentalis. +After the third Punic war, Scipio, as censor, built a second +bridge (<i>Pons Palatinus</i>) across the Tiber. It was situated +before the Velabrum, near to the Pons Sublicius, and +between it and the island. Not a trace of the Pons Sublicius +now exists. The Milvian bridge was at first likewise made +of wood, and no doubt that of Scipio also. The latter +remained throughout the middle ages until the sixteenth +century. There have been hydrostatic disputes about this +bridge, as to whether it was built flat against the current of +the river or not; it does not, however, seem probable, that, +if it had been constructed on a wrong principle, it should +have existed for a period of 1700 years; we must rather +suppose that during this long interval the Tiber changed its +course. In the sixteenth century, when the river had +retreated, the bridge broke down. I am of opinion that +Cavaliere Linotte, who asserts this, is right, although he is +not a man of learning: such investigations do not require +much learning, and good common sense is often of greater +assistance. In the same century, the bridge was restored, +but twenty years later it broke down again; at present only +a few arches of it exist, and the first, on the opposite bank, +may be assumed with certainty to be the one that was built +by Scipio. A poor woman had established a garden upon +its ruins, and for the payment of a trifle I was allowed to +go there as often as I liked.</p> + +<p>The <i>island</i> which, according to tradition, was formed out +of the corn thrown into the river after the expulsion of the +Tarquins, is remarkable for the temple of Aesculapius. +Even in very early times, and long before the age of +Augustus, the incredibly tasteless attempt was made to give +to that temple the form of a ship, in imitation of the vessel +in which the god had been conveyed to Rome; it was built +of travertine. During the middle ages a considerable part +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_105">[105]</span>of the temple still existed, as may be seen from a drawing +of Boissard, which was made in the fourteenth century. +Old people under Pius VI. still saw a great deal of it, but +afterwards a large part of the wall was used for other purposes; +in like manner a splendid part of the thermae of +Titus was destroyed as late as 1796.</p> + +<p>The island was connected with the mainland on both +sides by the <i>Pons Cestius</i> and the <i>Pons Fabricius</i>, which +were very ancient. Next came the <i>Pons Senatorius</i>, on the +spot now occupied by the Ponte Sisto; <i>Pons Aelius</i> near +S. Angelo, and the <i>Pons Milvius</i> outside the city, now +Ponte Molle.</p> + +<p>I shall now proceed to speak of</p> + +<h3 id="The_rest_of_Latium"><span class="smcap">Latium</span></h3> + +<p class="noindent">as the country of the Latins. We shall first take Latium +Proper, then the coast from Antium to Terracina, which +was originally a Tyrrhenian and afterwards a Volscian +country, and lastly the country of the Hernicans. But I +have previously to make some remarks about the port towns +of Rome.</p> + +<p>All rivers of any importance carrying sand or mud form +a delta, their mouths being pushed forward by the tides or +the nature of the seas. Down to a certain point, they flow +in a straight line, and then divide into two arms, leaving a +low sand-bank between them. Such are the deltas of the +Po, the Mississipi, the Nile, and the Ganges. The Tiber +forms a similar πρόχωσις, and the ridges of sand on both +sides become more and more widely separated from each +other. On the left arm, which accordingly must have +existed as early as that time, king Ancus Marcius, who is +no doubt an historical personage, built the town of <i>Ostia</i>. +I believe I can prove that Ancus Marcius concluded a treaty +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_106">[106]</span>with the Latins, by which a number of the Latin towns, I +mean those between Rome and the sea, were ceded to +Rome, while other places remained united with Latium. +In after times, Rome twice concluded similar treaties with +Latium. Ostia was founded as a pure Roman colony, and +became the port town of Rome. Afterwards it grew into +a very large place, as is clear from the extensive and very +splendid ruins. It was first destroyed in the war between +Marius and Sulla, and afterwards frightfully devastated +by the Vandals; in the ninth century it existed again, +but was then destroyed by the Saracens. The great pope +Leo IV. restored it, but the new town was not of long +duration. At present the atmosphere is very unhealthy, +which was not the case in the time of ancient Rome; +whence we must infer, that then there were no marshes +in the neighbourhood, for the poisonous air comes from the +marshes. The district is at present so neglected that the +place is completely deserted.</p> + +<p>In the time of the Antonines, Ostia was the summer +residence of the Romans, probably those of the middle +classes, who had no large estates and could not afford +to remain away from Rome for any great length of +time. A very pleasing description of it occurs in the +apologetic work of Minutius Felix, the scene of which is +laid at Ostia. The Roman jurists spent their vacations +there. The beauty and wealth of the place at that time +form a remarkable contrast with its present condition, for +scarcely any persons but criminals live there; for a long time +past Ostia has been a sort of asylum, where murderers are +safe against the danger of being seized by the police. This +is one of the most fearful changes: the country round it is +an immense swamp inhabited by buffalos.</p> + +<p>In the reign of Claudius an artificial port was formed on +the right arm of the Tiber, which was deeper, the course of +the river having been regulated. Trajan extended the port, +and this <i>Portus Romanus</i> now became the real sea-port of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_107">[107]</span>Rome, a depôt for the immense supplies required for the +city. At present, too, the little maritime commerce of the +Romans is carried on along the right bank of the Tiber.</p> + +<p>I will not mention all the places of ancient Latium which +happen to be once noticed by ancient writers, many of +them are mere names of destroyed places; much more +might indeed be made out than has yet been done, but the +advantages would not be very considerable. We must conceive +Latium in the earlier times to have been divided into +three parts: 1. <i>Alba and its perioeci</i>, or thirty neighbouring +and dependent places, said to have been colonies, and called +<i>Albenses</i>; 2. the <i>Latin demi</i>, about Alba and its territory, +the number of which we may assume, without fear of being +mistaken, to have likewise amounted to thirty. They +formed the Latin state, and stood in the same relation to +Alba in which Latium afterwards stood to Rome; 3. the +<i>Tyrrhenian towns on the coast</i>, which were properly foreign +to the body of the Latin state, but may possibly have been +in alliance with it. I have succeeded in throwing more +light upon this relation between Alba and the Latin towns +than I myself could formerly have expected; I have found +all the names of the thirty Albensian towns, but the list of +the others is not complete.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Alba</span> generally appears to us almost as a mythical place, +because it vanishes from Roman history at so early a period; +but there can be no doubt that its existence is a perfectly +historical fact, and that, too, in the relation I have just indicated. +But it never was the mother-city of Rome; the first +elements out of which Rome grew up may, perhaps, at one +time have constituted a portion of the towns which, in a +state of dependence as perioeci, were united with Alba into +one state, but may have separated themselves from it at an +early period: Rome itself was never founded by Alba. +The place where Alba was once situated is still so distinctly +marked that it cannot be mistaken. From the testimonies +of the ancients, we know that it was situated at the foot +of the Alban hill, forming one long street, high above the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_108">[108]</span>Alban lake, whence its name <i>Alba Longa</i>. Every one in +that district shows the spot near the place called Palazzuolo, +where may be seen the ancient tomb of a praetor with six +fasces distinctly cut into the rock. This site has been +recognised by several Italians, chiefly men without learning, +but who had eyes to see that on this spot the rock has been +cut away to a considerable height. This part must be conceived +to have been below the town, so that the lake, even +when its waters were very low, rendered the town perfectly +inaccessible. The present level of the lake is the result of +a tunnel (<i>emissarius</i>); but I am of opinion that formerly it +must have been much lower.⁠<a id="FNanchor_31" href="#Footnote_31" class="fnanchor">[31]</a> In this manner the town +was safe on that side, for the rock was cut away to such a +height as to render it impossible to scale it by means of +ladders; on the precipitous side of the rock opposite +no artificial protection was necessary. Thus the town +could be attacked only on the two accessible sides, which +for this reason were fortified. The summit of the hill +was probably fortified by an arx. The hill, now called +Monte Cavo, though only 2,900 French feet in height, is +one of the highest in that district; from it a person acquainted +with Roman history enjoys the most magnificent +prospect, for he may there survey the whole territory of the +Roman state such as it was until the fourth century of the +city. On this summit stood the very ancient temple of +Jupiter Latiaris, which was certainly as old as the temple +on the Capitoline, and a road led up to it which is still quite +intact, and is made in the same style as the Roman high +roads. There the Alban dictators once used to ride up to +offer their thanks to Jupiter Latiaris for victories they had +gained; Roman generals also triumphed there, when they +could not obtain permission from the senate to celebrate +their triumph in the Capitol; there lastly the Feriae Latinae +were celebrated. The temple is now completely destroyed, +and the foundation stones, which still existed there, were +broken down in the 18th century. The large blocks of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_109">[109]</span>stone were too huge for the puny race, and were, accordingly, +broken to pieces to build a monastery. The last +remains, consisting of beautiful square blocks, were carefully +raised from the ground in the year 1780 or 1790. The +Monte Cavo, like the lake, is of a volcanic nature.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Lavinium</span>, which is nothing else than Lacinium in +Oenotria (both forms being only dialectic varieties of Latinium), +was the real sanctuary of Latium, and every year +a common sacrifice was offered there by all the Latins. +There is a tradition, that six hundred families were sent +thither from Alba, that is, ten from every demos, the thirty Albensian +and the thirty Latin towns. In this manner the +statement of Dionysius of Halicarnassus resolves itself into +a general formula of a common settlement, proceeding from +Alba and <i>commune Latium</i> (this is the correct name for all +the Latins, like κοινὸν Θεσσαλῶν). Originally Lavinium +was regarded as common property, like Washington; but +when subsequently it became a place of importance, it +obtained its independence, and was a town like all the +others.</p> + +<p>Besides Lavinium, which was fabulously said to be a +Trojan colony, there existed on that coast, between the +Tiber and Antium, two other places, <span class="smcap">Laurentum</span> and the +Rutulian <span class="smcap">Ardea</span>, which are familiar to us from the Aeneid. +The ending <i>entum</i> in Laurentum is Pelasgian, as in the +case of Maluentum and others; but it is Latinised, the +native form probably was οῦς, Λαυροῦς. After the Volscian +calamity, when the whole Latin confederacy broke +up, Ardea was a separate town: it received a Romano-Latin +colony, and accordingly entered into an entirely new relation. +Cyclopean walls are still found there, but the place +is so desolate, that at present it has only thirty houses with +about eighty inhabitants.</p> + +<p>The most important of the Latin towns in the vicinity +of Rome was <span class="smcap">Tusculum</span>; it was distant only a few miles +and could be seen from Rome, being situated above Frascati. +During the middle ages, it was destroyed by the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_110">[110]</span>degenerate Romans, and never restored on the height, but +the survivors were obliged to settle at the foot of the hill, +which was the origin of the modern Frascati. The ruins +of Tusculum which have been dug out are very important; +the theatre was found with very beautiful statues in it, but +it has been covered over again. A number of pedestals +with inscriptions also were found, which are no doubt as +ancient as the persons they described; some are as old as +the period after the Hannibalian war, as for example, the +one of Fulvius Nobilior, the conqueror of Aetolia: nowhere +have so many ancient stones been brought to light; but +the number of inscriptions belonging to the earlier times and +even to the Augustan age is extremely small. The whole +district belongs to Lucien Bonaparte, who has made excavations, +in the process of which very many things of importance +have been discovered. If he had continued them, +extraordinary things would certainly have been brought +to light; but he has no interest for anything except works +of art, statues and the like, and it is impossible to make +him see the importance of the remains of antiquity. He +has the most unhistorical mind, and is unable to understand +of what interest antiquities can be to history: the most +beautiful things have been sold by him. He is one of those +men who enjoy a high degree of celebrity without deserving +it: he is lively, but absurd, and an extremely bad epic +poet. He has laid out a garden on a hill, and on a box-tree +in it he has inscribed in order the names of the greatest +epic poets, beginning near the root: out of modesty he has +put his own name lowest, and ascends up to Homer. It +was impossible to induce him to make excavations according +to a regular plan. I have often been in despair about +it: this is a grief which a man may often have to bear in +Italy, because excavations can be so easily made. The +Fasti Capitolini are of extreme importance in Roman history; +three large pieces of them had been found behind +the church of S. Maria Liberatrice, and I implored the +authorities to grant me permission to dig there, offering +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_111">[111]</span>to bear the expenses myself; but I could not obtain permission, +and was told that it would be done in due time, +and that our descendants also must have something to do. +Such things are a severe trial of one’s patience. If excavations +were made at Tusculum, a Roman Herculaneum would +be found. I do not mean to say that buildings equally +well preserved would be discovered, but the ruins are very +large, and the streets would certainly be found. When I +was there, excavations were accidentally made below a +wall, but they were afterwards stopped, for Lucien Bonaparte +was inexorable. Once, during excavations which +were continued only for a few weeks, a whole street with +the walls of the houses up to a certain height was discovered; +it was of the most perfect construction, although +it was only the street of a country town, for Tusculum +was certainly not larger than Coblenz. The street was +completely filled with pieces of architecture, which had +fallen down during the barbarous process of destruction: +columns of the most beautiful marble were found, but +broken to pieces, and statues of the most exquisite workmanship, +such as one might expect to find at Rome during +its most brilliant period. The architecture is that of the +imperial period; the street also contained a well, the water +of which was carried down from a hill. Very ancient +inscriptions also were found, one of which contained the +name of A. Sicinius, who is mentioned by Livy in the war +against Perseus. If the Forum were laid open, Fasti and +law-tables would no doubt be brought to light; it is still +possible to say whereabouts it must have been situated. +In like manner the site of the Forum of Praeneste was known, +and fragments of the Fasti of Verrius Flaccus were found +there, although the excavations were made very carelessly. +In later times Tusculum was the most brilliant among the +Latin towns.</p> + +<p>The second Latin town in point of rank was <span class="smcap">Tibur</span>, now +celebrated, under the name of Tivoli, for its waterfalls, the +charming nature of the country, and the beauty of its ruins. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_112">[112]</span>Some persons erroneously consider the sepulchral monument +of Cellius, built in the age of Augustus, to be a +temple of the Sibyl. Tibur ruled over a considerable +number of dependent towns. Its present circumference +dates from the middle ages, for in antiquity it was considerably +smaller. All these towns were very little, though +they have a great name in history. Two learned Jesuits, +Cabral and Del Ré, have written a very good topographical +history of Tivoli.</p> + +<p>The third Latin place is <span class="smcap">Praeneste</span>, now Palestrina. +This metathesis is common in Italian; even when they write +correctly, they speak badly from affectation, especially the +higher classes: instead of <i>una capra</i>, the Roman people +usually say <i>una carpa</i>. The <i>l</i> and <i>r</i> also are interchanged: +at the time of the French revolution, when a republic was +forced upon the Romans, they were unable to pronounce +the name, and said <i>la Repubrica</i>. I have found traces of +a form <i>Penestra</i> belonging to the time when the western +empire still existed; in the middle ages <i>civitas</i> was always +added, and the simple names were thereby completely suppressed; +people, therefore, did not say <i>Lanuvium</i>, but <i>civitas +Lanuvina</i>, and so also <i>civitas Penestrina</i>. Praeneste was an +immense place both in regard to its extent and to its fortifications, +and was situated on a hill. Fortuna was its +tutelary divinity, whose temple with its <i>temenos</i> occupied +the acra, and the whole of the present little town of Palestrina +is situated within the ruins of that temple. We still +possess descriptions of it belonging to the end of the thirteenth +century; many parts of it must then have been +preserved; in the fourteenth the town was taken by pope +Bonifacius VIII., and everything was then destroyed with +barbarous fury; at present we can only admire the immense +substructions on the side of the hill, for the town, like +many others, was built up the hill in the form of terraces; +and when it was intended to enlarge the town, a new terrace +was built.</p> + +<p>In Roman history Praeneste does not appear as an +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_113">[113]</span>important town till after the Gallic time. As to the impatience +with which it, more than any other Latin town, bore +the Roman yoke during the fifth century, from the Samnite +wars until the war of Pyrrhus, we have distinct indications, +although history is silent about it. The Praenestines made +repeated attempts to shake it off; but although they were +unsuccessful in this, still they gained the respect of the +Romans, and obtained from them an honourable relation, +with which they were satisfied. After this, they were the +most faithful allies of the Romans, and during the Hannibalian +war they were as attached to them as they had +previously been intrepid in their struggles for their own +independence. During the Social War they obtained the +franchise, and were passionate champions of the Marian +party. Marius the younger there sustained the terrible +siege, after which Sulla took the town, and shewed the +first symptoms of his raving cruelty: he butchered the whole +population, and established a colony of veterans in the place. +The town became quite desolate. Most of the Latin towns +had perished at an early period.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Lanuvium</span>, afterwards <i>civitas Lanuvina</i>, on the Via Appia, +still shows remains of a large wall, and indications that it +once was a splendid town; it must not, however, be supposed +to have been very extensive. Among its buildings, +I may notice the temple of Juno Lanuvina, a common +sanctuary for the Romans and Latins.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Aricia</span> was situated on the same road; its arx was on +a height, but the town itself in the valley; at present +the road most inconveniently and dangerously runs right +across the height. Aricia was somewhat nearer Rome than +Lanuvium; for a time it seems to have been the first among +the Latin towns, I allude to the period after the banishment +of the kings, when Rome and Latium were separated. The +temple and grove of Diana Aricina were near the beautiful +lake of Nemi, not far from Aricia.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Gabii</span>, one of the most ancient towns, has a traditional +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_114">[114]</span>greatness in the earliest history of Rome. Dionysius still +saw its extensive walls, of which at present every vestige +has disappeared, but the ruins of the cella of a vast temple +of Juno may still be seen. History does not inform us +when the town was destroyed, but it was probably during +the period of the Aequian wars, for after them it is no +longer mentioned in the history of the republic; and in the +age of Cicero it was a deserted place. Excellent remains +were found there during the excavations made by Prince +Borghese; he came upon ruins of the Forum, various works +of art, many inscriptions and statues, which, though not of +the first order, are yet of good workmanship. Under the +Roman emperors a population appears to have again assembled +in several of those towns, which were situated on +high roads; whence they rose again, though they remained +small places with a wretched population of vagabonds from +all parts, who did not form a civil community, although +they had a civic constitution. Hence Gabii at a later period +had a bishop. This also accounts for the fact, that works +of art belonging to a late period of Rome are found in those +early destroyed places. At present Gabii is quite deserted.</p> + +<p>The place for the general assemblies of the Latins was +near the Alban lake, which, like a crater, is environed by +a high ridge of surrounding hills. The place of meeting +is supposed, and I think justly, to have been on the other +side of this crater; but there is no evidence to support this +view. The spot is now occupied by the town of Marino, +below which there is a beautiful well, generally believed to +be the well of Ferentina.</p> + +<p>The tunnel of the Alban lake, a wonderful work, is one +of the curiosities of Latium; it runs nearly three Roman +miles under ground towards the place of its destination, and +was intended to carry off the water of the lake, which, +when, in consequence of earthquakes, the subterraneous +passages had become blocked up, rose above the ridge of +the crater and inundated the country. I have already +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_115">[115]</span>spoken about this extraordinary structure in my History of +Rome,⁠<a id="FNanchor_32" href="#Footnote_32" class="fnanchor">[32]</a> and shall, therefore, confine myself to a brief +recapitulation. It is difficult to form a clear idea of the +matter. Imagine the crater filled to the edge, and bear in +mind that it was intended to give to it a level about 200 feet +lower. In order to attain this, a line was first drawn in +the contemplated direction of the tunnel, and by this line +it could be seen how deep it must be to answer its purpose. +In order to obtain the level, and at the same time to employ +a great many hands, shafts were sunk along the whole line +at a distance of less than a hundred feet from one another. +It was easy to calculate how deep each shaft ought to be, +so as to bring the bottom of the tunnel to the level which +it was intended to give to it. These numerous shafts also +facilitated the running off of the water on account of the +pressure of the air, and at the same time rendered access to +the tunnel easy. On any other plan only few persons +could have been employed at a time, whereas now from +every shaft two parties worked in opposite directions and +broke through the rock. This working of different parties +towards one another also insured their keeping the exact +level. This tunnel, which was the admiration even of +ancient Rome, has now existed for a period of 2500 years; +it is still entire, and will exist in all time to come, unless +some great revolution of the earth shall break it to pieces. +The Roman cloacae are of the same character, and will +endure until the last day of the earth. There are many +such tunnels in the Roman territory, of which at present +the advantages alone are perceptible, but whence they carry +the waters can no longer be ascertained. Such is the case +near lake Nemi: the whole valley of Aricia was formerly a +lake, which is now perfectly drained. There, too, a great +thing was effected by a little tunnel: the valley of Aricia is +one of the most fertile in the world, and is still the same as +it is described by Pliny. The fertility in Italy is so great +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_116">[116]</span>that wheat, unless it is weeded, cannot grow; agriculture +there requires a degree of industry of which we have no +idea; if any one were to introduce there the system of +Flemish or English agriculture, it would lead to ruin.</p> + +<p>The <i>Vallis Albana</i> is the modern valley of Grotta Ferrata.</p> + +<p>In the east of Latium, in its narrower sense, we have the +towns of</p> + +<h3 id="The_Hernicans"><span class="smcap">The Hernicans.</span></h3> + +<p>We know only five of them; <span class="smcap">Anagnia</span> was the capital, +to which the others were opposed as a political body. +We here again find a parallel phenomenon: the same +relation which existed between Alba and the Albensian +towns, and between Rome and the Latin towns, appears +to have existed between Anagnia and the towns of the +Hernicans. This is briefly, but officially, alluded to in the +Triumphal Fasti, where Q. Marcius Tremulus triumphs <i>de +Anagninis Hernicisque</i>. The other towns were <i>Frusino</i>, <i>Ferentinum</i>, +<i>Verulae</i>, and <i>Alatrium</i>. There can, however, be no +doubt that they had more towns; some must have been +taken from them by the Volscians and Aequians, while +others may have continued to exist, but decayed and +perished, so that we have no information about them. +Livy, in speaking of the last war against the Hernicans, +says, <i>omnes Hernici nominis populi</i>, except three. I have a +conjecture which is a combination of several traces, and +according to which their number was forty. All the five above-mentioned +places still exist; they are generally small and poor, +with the exception of Anagnia, which is a place of some consequence; +but all of them are still imposing on account of +their ruins and their mighty Cyclopean walls, in which +towers and gates are still preserved.</p> + +<p>Servius, on the Aeneid, and the ancient Scholia on Virgil, +fragments of which were published about ten years ago by +A. Mai from a Veronese MS., state that the name <i>Hernici</i> +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_117">[117]</span>is derived from the Sabine word <i>hernae</i>, which Arndt very +happily compares with the Swiss <i>firn</i> (mountain); as there +exists a radical affinity between the two languages, such a +comparison is certainly admissible. According to this, the +Hernicans were a Sabine or Marsian colony. Another +statement, however, though of very weak authority, in +Julius Hyginus, makes the Hernicans Pelasgians. If we +consider that the Sabines pressed forward at a comparatively +late period, perhaps about the time of the foundation +of Rome, and that the Hernicans dwelt on the other side +of the Oscan nation of the Aequians, it is probable that the +Hernicans, like the Latins, were of Tyrrhenian origin. +An etymology like that mentioned before is very captivating, +and it is not easy to get rid of it; but if we ask +ourselves, What is the ground of the derivation? How could +the name come from their habitations? Did the other +Sabines call them Hernicans in the same manner in which +the Scotch Lowlanders call the Gael in the mountains +Highlanders? It is possible that the name Hernicans is +only a surname to another national name; they may, in +this case, have belonged to a different race, and have +received that surname from the Sabines. That a people +should call itself mountaineers from its habitations is very +surprising. The derivation may be very accidental: in like +manner the Thuringians might be said to owe their name +to the old word <i>Taure</i>, which signifies “mountain.” If we +assume that the Hernicans were Tyrrhenians, they occupied +exactly the district in which they could have maintained +themselves against the shock of the Ausonians, who were +pressed on by the Sabines. But nothing decisive can be +said on this point, we can only form conjectures; and we +must carefully distinguish between what is conjectural and +what is certain.⁠<a id="FNanchor_33" href="#Footnote_33" class="fnanchor">[33]</a>⁠</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_118">[118]</span></p> + +<p>There is no occasion for saying anything more about the +towns of the Hernicans which I have mentioned. On the +side of a rock, near the town of Ferentinum, there still +exists a fragment of a will engraved in the stone. A +wealthy citizen leaves a legacy, and fixes the interest +of his landed property. The late Madame Dionigi, who +made a drawing of it and published it, states that two of +the pieces of land still exist in that district and bear the +same name. A great many things of this kind continue to +exist in some parts of Italy from ancient times; he who +lives there in intimate familiarity with every-day affairs, +and who does not mind spending months in those places, +may recover the past to an extent which we believe altogether +impossible.</p> + +<p>The Hernicans formed part of the Roman and Latin confederacy, +and had their share in the Feriae Latinae. In +ancient times they were allied with Rome on equal terms, and +shared with her and Latium all that they conquered in war. +Afterwards this alliance was broken up, as I shall show in +the second volume of my History,⁠<a id="FNanchor_34" href="#Footnote_34" class="fnanchor">[34]</a> because being weak and +powerless, they could no longer claim their former rights. +After the Gallic calamity, when Rome had fallen, they made +themselves independent, and thirty years later the ancient +treaty was renewed, and remained in force for fifty years, to +the great advantage of the Hernicans. They were a small +people, which did not extend, while Rome enlarged her +dominion immensely. Hence the Romans demanded that the +relation which had hitherto subsisted between them should +be discontinued. In consequence of this, a war arose between +them and the Hernicans, in which the latter had +reason bitterly to repent their presumption.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_119">[119]</span></p> + +<h3 id="The_Volscians_and_Aequians"><span class="smcap">The Volscians and Aequians.</span></h3> + +<p>Both these Ausonian nations lived within the boundaries +of Latium in its wider sense. The Volscians were subdivided +into smaller parts, the Antiatan, Ecetranian, and +other Volscians without any definite name. All the coast +towns, as far as the upper Liris, were Volscian, as e.g. Anxur +or Terracina, Privernum, Sora, Arpinum, Fabrataria, Fregellae, +etc. The Aequians, on the other hand, dwelt on +the one side as far as Praeneste, and on the other as far as +lake Fucinus in the north. The Aequians and Volscians are +almost always mentioned together, just as Romans and +Latins, whence it is probable that isopolity existed between +the two nations. Every man belonging to one nation +might take up his abode among the other with which it +was in isopolity: he there enjoyed higher rights than an +alien; he was not, indeed, a full citizen, but a free member +of the community; he was what was termed in the middle +ages a pale-burgher. This is a relation which, on the +whole, is seldom rightly understood by German jurists, and +even by K. F. Eichhorn, who, in other respects, is a man +of the greatest merit in matters of German law. Such an +isopolity must have existed between the Aequians and +Volscians; but besides this, they must have had another +political connection, for a large party of the Aequians very +frequently made common cause with a numerous body of +the Volscians.</p> + +<p>It is an important point to decide, as to whether the +Volscians always inhabited the towns on the coast from +Antium as far as Terracina, which are called Volscian, or +whether they took possession of them as conquerors. At +first I shared in the general error, thinking that they had +always been Volscian; afterwards, I began to doubt—the +first step towards truth—and to consider the possibility of +its being otherwise; and now I am convinced that the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_120">[120]</span>country was originally inhabited by Tyrrhenians, that it +was afterwards conquered by the Volscians, and that this +event did not occur till after the banishment of the kings. +All the places on the coast from Terracina to Antium, as +well as Velitrae in the interior, were once Pelasgian, and +may be justly called Latin, this being the ancient and common +name. Receive this result of my inquiries with +confidence; there is no danger of your being mistaken. In +like manner, the Aequians extended their dominion in the +direction of the Latins and Hernicans at the expense of +both.</p> + +<p>All the Volscians did not form one common state: the +people of Arpinum, Sora, Anxur, Formiae, and Fundi +may, at the time of their first conquest, have mutually +assisted one another; but when their possessions were +secured, when Antium and Ecetrae had become Volscian, +the towns situated farther behind probably did not exert +themselves for the other Volscian places.</p> + +<p>In regard to the Aequians, it would almost seem, as if they +had formed one compact state, although each of the several +towns could, by itself, do little or nothing; scarcely one of +them is deserving of notice. If we possessed the ancient +commentaries on the Aeneid, we should know a great deal +more about the ethnography and chorography of those +parts. Virgil speaks of Nersae as one of the principal towns +of the Aequians: <i>et te montosae misere in proelia Nersae</i>;⁠<a id="FNanchor_35" href="#Footnote_35" class="fnanchor">[35]</a> +editors have unwarrantably changed this into <i>Nursae</i>, and +referred it to Nursia, which is an Umbrian town in the +Apennines beyond the Sabines, to which the Aequians +never penetrated. People will not own, that there are +things of which they know nothing. The books of Servius +unfortunately have come down to us only in a wretched +abridgment: if we examine the first two books, of which +we have the original, we cannot but feel respect for +Servius as a great grammarian. In like manner, the name +of mount Vesulus—in the illustration of the boar inhabiting +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_121">[121]</span>the marshes of the valley of Laurentum and the heights of +Vesulus—has been senselessly referred to a hill near the +sources of the Padus.⁠<a id="FNanchor_36" href="#Footnote_36" class="fnanchor">[36]</a> The hill must have been in the +neighbourhood of Laurentum, in a district which Virgil +knew very well, and which must afterwards have lost its +name. I can well imagine what kind of a place Vesulus +may have been, but it was most assuredly not a glacier of +the Alps. This is one specimen of the perverse manner +in which Virgil has been commented upon; an able commentary +on the Aeneid, not too diffuse, has yet to be +written; in regard to the Eclogues and the Georgics, Voss +has done everything that can be desired.</p> + +<p>The Aequians extended as far as lake Fucinus. When in +the middle of the fifth century the Romans subdued them, +they destroyed nearly fifty of their places, and forced the +franchise upon them. Afterwards they obtained favourable +terms and fair treatment, but the first shock of the war was +terrible.</p> + +<p>In the second and third books of Livy, the Volscians and +Aequians generally come in contact with each other on +mount <i>Algidus</i>. There are different opinions as to what +mountain is meant by this name; scholars commonly rely +on a passage in the Itineraries, where a place <i>Algidus</i> or +<i>Algidum</i> is mentioned. The district is now never visited, +because it is the haunt of fearful robbers; however, after I +had left Italy, a friend of mine visited and described the +localities. Between the countries of the Latins and Hernicans, +there was a high and cold table land, <i>locus algidus</i>, +not hills in the proper sense, but a rugged district covered +with wood (<i>ilex</i>). At present there remain but slight +traces of that forest, which is a little to the north of Velitrae. +As the Aequians and Volscians were contiguous there, they +separated the Hernicans from the Romans and Latins, and +thus were pernicious to the latter. According to these +statements, you will have no difficulty in finding the situation +of mount Algidus in your maps.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_122">[122]</span></p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Antium</span> was a Volscian place; I do not mean to say +that the whole population consisted of Volscians, but it had +received a Volscian colony, which gave the prevailing +name; as Virgil says, <i>Tusco de sanguine vires</i>, so we may say +of Antium, <i>Volsco de sanguine vires</i>. In ancient times, +Antium was an important maritime and commercial place, +but also the haunt of pirates; afterwards it became a <i>colonia +maritima</i>, that is, its inhabitants were bound to serve in +maritime war, and on extraordinary emergencies; they had +the Roman franchise, but not the right of voting. The +place was greatly favoured, and in the course of time became +the emporium of the whole Latin country; its harbour was +much better than that of any of the other towns on the +same coast, such as Laurentum and Lavinium, which had +only road-steads. At a later time, it was artificially improved, +a circumstance which had become necessary, for +the mud of the Tiber, which was carried along the coast, +filled up the harbour. Afterwards Antium was one of those +places, in which the wealthy Roman nobles were fond of +taking up their summer residence, especially during the +first century after Christ. Nero changed it into a military +colony, but of an irregular kind.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Terracina</span> or <span class="smcap">Anxur</span>, was a large and ancient Tyrrhenian +city; Anxur is acknowledged to be its Volscian +name. Its double name alone leads to the supposition that +the place had a mixed population.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Ecetrae</span>, one of the central points of the Volscian +population, must be looked for in the interior of the country, +above the Pontine marshes, and not far from Ferentinum. +It afterwards entirely disappears like so many other places +in that district. I cannot explain this otherwise, than by +supposing that the Romans have drawn a veil over the +Samnite wars. The time when so many places were destroyed +there, must have been that when the Samnites +penetrated into the heart of Latium.</p> + +<p>The Volscians, like the Aequians, belonged the Ausonian +race, of which I have spoken in the general survey of the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_123">[123]</span>Italian nations. If you compare the names, you will find +that the Opicans and Apulians were one and the same +people, and that the names of the ancient Italian nations +have undergone various changes without a difference in +meaning. Thus the <i>Aequi</i> are also called <i>Aequani</i>, <i>Aequuli</i>, +and <i>Aequiculi</i>, all of which are one and the same name, +just as <i>Graeci</i> and <i>Graeculi</i>, and <i>Hispani</i> and <i>Hispalli</i>, which +were originally used without any difference of meaning. +The Aequians and Volscians, as I said before, belonged to +this Oscan or Ausonian race, to which Latin writers also +give the name <i>Aurunci</i>, while the Greeks call them <i>Ausones</i>. +The same name often has a general signification, and sometimes +again it is applied only to a special part, just as +<i>Thessalians</i> sometimes signifies the inhabitants of the country +of Thessaly, and sometimes the population of Cyzicus, +Ravenna, and Agylla, without there being any necessity of +thinking of colonisation. In the same manner, Auruncans +or Opicans are both the name of the whole race, and at the +same time the name of separate portions. This changeableness +in the use of names renders the survey of the history +of ancient nations difficult, as the ancients themselves never +express an opinion on this twofold meaning, and as those +whose works are extant, are often themselves in error +about it.</p> + +<p>The Volscians, thus regarded as a portion of the Ausonians +or Auruncans, extended from the Apennines in the +neighbourhood of Arpinum along the Liris, south of the +Hernicans as far as the coast of Antium. But there can be +no doubt that they dwelt farther east, and the migration of +the Cascans and Priscans was certainly owing to a commotion +among that race. The Aeneid contains many traces +of the original population of Latium, as for example, when +the poet says, <i>Memini Auruncos ita ferre senes</i>.⁠<a id="FNanchor_37" href="#Footnote_37" class="fnanchor">[37]</a>⁠</p> + +<p>I have already spoken of the Volscians on the coast, of +Antium, Terracina, and of the Ecetrani, whose name is often +mentioned in history, but whose town is not spoken of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_124">[124]</span>anywhere; from one passage of Livy⁠<a id="FNanchor_38" href="#Footnote_38" class="fnanchor">[38]</a> alone, it may be +inferred that it was situated near Ferentinum: it is possible +that it may have been taken from the Hernicans by the +Volscians. The population of such towns must never be +conceived to have been totally changed. The Gauls, and +similar uncivilised nations, sometimes did extirpate the +ancient population; but people like the Romans and Volscians +only settled as colonists among a conquered population, +taking a part of its territory for themselves, either for the purpose +of cultivating it themselves or of changing the former +owners into coloni. Such also was the case with the population +of Antium, as I have already mentioned. In the second +volume of my Roman History, I shall explain, what in +Livy’s history is quite inconceivable, namely, how it happens +that Antium appears as a thoroughly Volscian town, which +can be accounted for only by the idea we form of the +power of the Volscian colonists. Livy is not the only +cause of the confusion, but the annalists of the seventh +century also have their share in it. If we had but Fabius, +we might safely say, that we required no further deductions +to discover the ancient relation, which in his work was +undoubtedly quite clear and obvious.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Fundi</span> and <span class="smcap">Formiae</span> likewise belong to those Volscian +towns established on ancient Tyrrhenian foundations; but +<span class="smcap">Arpinum</span>, the birth-place of Marius and Cicero, is the +most immortal among the Volscian towns. The present +circumference of the walls shows that it was a large and +strong place. This town, impelled by necessity, remained +faithful to the Romans when they were hard pressed by the +Samnites.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Fregellae</span> is found in our maps in the vicinity of +Arpinum, and not far from the Liris. It is remarkable in +history, and its first occurrence in Livy throws considerable +light upon the course of events. It was a Volscian town, +and was destroyed by the Samnites; the Romans then, +contrary to the ordinary Italian law of nations, sent a +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_125">[125]</span>colony into it. The Samnites, who were allied with the +Romans, denied their right to establish a colony there. +This was one of the chief causes of the second Samnite +war. The Samnites, however, were wrong in claiming it, +for Fregellae was the key to the Via Latina, and hence the +security of the Roman frontier demanded that the place +should be in the hands of the Romans: to the Samnites it +was a point of attack, to the Romans it was a means of +defence; unless, therefore, the Samnites intended to make +war upon the Romans, they were wrong in opposing its +occupation by the Romans. Such circumstances must be +taken into consideration, in deciding upon the justice or +injustice of a question. It is difficult to comprehend how +that town rose to such extraordinary power. Pyrrhus conquered +it, and it suffered greatly; but from the last book +of Livy we see that thousands of Sabellian families, Samnites, +Pelignians, and others had settled there. This +circumstance, however, was followed by consequences +unfortunate for Fregellae. The numerical increase made +the town proud, and during the disputes between the Latin +colonies and Rome, it claimed to be at their head. Encouraged +by the measures of the Gracchi, it obstinately +demanded the franchise long before the Italicans came +forward. On the whole, ancient history presents many +parallels to modern history, sometimes they occur on a larger +scale in antiquity and sometimes in modern times. The +relation here alluded to is that of the Irish in their connection +with England. When Ireland, in 1782, demanded +its independence, the Anglicans in their claims against +England, went far beyond the Roman Catholics and the +other dissenters, and they alone gained advantages. A +small parallel in comparison with the great one in antiquity +occurs at Geneva, in the relation between the <i>bourgeoisie</i> of +the suburb St. Gervais to the <i>citoyens</i> of the old town, +where the <i>natifs</i> had all the real power, while the <i>habitans</i> +possessed only very little. Fregellae, then, stood at the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_126">[126]</span>head of the Latin colonies, and looked with pride upon its +power; its inhabitants believed that Rome would not +allow matters to come to extremes, and if they should come +to that, they counting the population of the Latin colonies +found that they were stronger than Rome by many hundred +thousands: they thought that they might oppose the +Romans, degraded by freedmen and poverty, with an able +force of free country people. But the result was quite +different. Rome acted with cunning: the Italian allies +had not yet made up their minds, and did not yet take part +in the interests of the Latins, thinking that the Latin +colonies would take care of themselves alone, and that, if +it should come to a war, they would become reconciled with +Rome, and leave the Italian allies to settle their affairs as +best they could. Even the other colonies showed no common +interest, perhaps because they were jealous of Fregellae, or +they hesitated because they were so much scattered among +the Umbrians, Etruscans, etc., and for that reason were +wanting in courage. Fregellae thus stood alone: it was +conquered and destroyed by L. Opimius, and never restored. +Fabrataria, another colony, was established in its vicinity.</p> + +<p>The Latin colonies, <i>Interamnium</i>, <i>Sora</i>, and <i>Casinum</i>, formed +a complete chain of fortresses in the same district. It was +partly before the outbreak of the second Samnite war, and +partly during its progress, that the Romans were anxiously +bent upon establishing fortified places; and these measures +made them as secure as France was by its frontier fortresses. +Their frontier was thus very effectually protected against +the Samnites, for all those fortresses were planned with +great sagacity. The Samnites, who, besides their unsatisfactory +constitution, had no fortresses, were thus weak, and +the Roman army could enter Samnium without meeting +with any obstacle. They were not inferior to the Romans +in bravery, but were nevertheless conquered by them, +because they were not agreed as to the manner in which +the war should be carried on. It is pitiable to see +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_127">[127]</span>how the excellent people year after year became more unhappy, +because they could not raise themselves above their +traditionary prejudices, though their salvation depended +upon it.</p> + +<h3 id="Campania"><span class="smcap">Campania.</span></h3> + +<p>This name has likewise different meanings. In the Roman +sense, it is the country of the Campanians, as Samnium is +the country of the Samnites; but the Campanians (on coins +they are called <i>Capani</i>) are the inhabitants of Capa or +Capua. In this sense Campania is a country of small +extent, comprising Capua and the neighbouring places, +Atella, Acerrae, Saticula, Calatia, Abella, Casilinum, Vulturnum, +and Linternum. All these places were situated on +the south of the Vulturnus, with the exception of Saticula; +the <i>ager Falernus</i>, between the Vulturnus and Liris, however, +likewise belonged to Campania. The Greeks, on the +other hand, applied the name Campanians to all the nations +of southern Italy belonging to the Oscan race, and this +accounts for the fact that the name Campania was also used +in a wider sense. This, however, occurs only in later times; +and the extent of country which is marked Campania in all +our maps, even in those of D’Anville, was not generally so +designated until the time of Augustus. The name then +embraced the whole country between the Vulturnus, the +Liris, and the heights of the Apennines about Arpinum +and Aquinum, so as to include Cales and Teanum,—in one +word, all the Oscan tribes north of the Vulturnus as far as +the frontier of the Volscians. I think I have already observed, +in the account of the division of Italy into regions, +that the expression <i>Campania Romae</i> was used as early as +the fourth or fifth century of our era; it is found in the +abridgment of Servius, which, however, was made in the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_128">[128]</span>seventh century. The name Champagne has quite a different +origin, probably from <i>campus</i>, a plain, whence <i>Campi +Catalaunici</i>, which also comprise the foreign immigrants +such as the Goths and others.</p> + +<p>You must bear in mind this difference of meaning, in +order that in reading the ancients, e.g., Livy, you may not +fall into the mistake of believing that Campania is the name +for the country which is so marked in our maps.</p> + +<p>Advancing from the Liris, we come upon Ausonian tribes +and <span class="smcap">Cales</span>, which, according to Livy, was an Auruncian +town. It was conquered by the Romans in the interval +between the great Latin and the second Samnite war, and +received a Roman colony.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Teanum</span> was a town of the Sidicines, likewise an +Ausonian people. That northern district between the +Vulturnus and the Liris, which did not extend as far as +the mountains, is one of the most delightful and fertile +countries; it is not, indeed, as productive as southern Campania, +the <i>agri lugubres Campaniae</i>, the πεδία Φλεγραῖα, the +coast country from Terracina to Gaeta and Formiae, where +a man has the feeling as if he were in a paradise full of the +most indescribable beauties—I was there in the month of +March, when spring was already displaying all its loveliness; +the summer, too, is not so scorching as in the neighbourhood +of Rome, for the country is well watered, and that even in +the middle of summer;—but the neighbourhood of Teanum +is a most delightful hilly country, with a beauty and richness +of trees which form a great contrast with those of Latium. +This was the country of the Falernian and Classic wines. +Teanum, according to Strabo, was a large town; but the +present ruins do not show many traces of that greatness, +though the silver coins which are found there show that +Strabo is correct.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Liris</span> deserves the name of <i>taciturnus amnis</i>; it has +no strong current, except in winter, when the heights are +covered with snow. The <span class="smcap">Vulturnus</span> is quite different; +descending from the neighbouring hills it has a strong +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_129">[129]</span>current; but it is not a beautiful river, being extremely +muddy. It is, however, a pleasure to see the active flow of +its waters. On its banks was situated</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Casilinum</span>, on the site of the modern Capua, which is +celebrated for the extraordinary defence of the Praenestine +cohort against Hannibal: the perseverance of a besieged +town is always interesting, and excites veneration. The +garrison murdered the Campanian inhabitants, that the provisions +might last so much longer. Hannibal took the +place, and after that time it is not often mentioned again. +The situation on the Via Appia somewhat raised its importance +in the time of the emperors; its means of subsistence, +as was the case with all places on high roads, were +derived from commerce.</p> + +<p>If we compare the present condition of Italy with what +it was in ancient times, say under Nero or at the time of +Pliny, there can be no doubt that Rome itself is only a +shadow of what it then was; I have calculated that its +population then amounted to from 600,000 to 700,000 +souls. But the territory around Rome was in those days +far more desolate than it is now: it is at present more +thickly peopled, better cultivated, and happier. Under +the later emperors the country may have somewhat recovered; +in the fourth century, previously to the plague under +Gallienus, it may have had a larger population, and so +also in the time of Theodosius. But I entirely agree with +Hume, against Wallace, that the population of Italy in +antiquity was far less numerous than at present, except in +Rome itself. Naples was then only a country town, of +about 20,000 or 30,000 inhabitants, while at present it has +400,000. But notwithstanding all this, Italy possessed incomparably +more wealth than at present, so that a small +town was of much greater importance than one at present +with a far larger population; a third-rate town, for example, +was illustrious for its works of art to a much greater extent +than any modern town of any country.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_130">[130]</span></p> + +<p>The name <span class="smcap">Capua</span> is now transferred to the town built +upon the ruins of Casilinum; ancient Capua was destroyed +by the Saracens during the Lombardic period: its ruins +can still be recognised; and among them the remains of an +amphitheatre are particularly remarkable; but no ancient +Campanian ruins are found there. I never was there, +because at the time the country was not safe, and there are +no high roads in those parts: I was a whole month at +Naples, but was too much engaged to go to Capua. The +inhabitants of the district are reported to form a band of +robbers, and many a one is said to have had sad experience +there. Notorious districts of this kind, however, are +different at different times: you may often go to such a place +without exposing yourself to any particular danger, while +at other times it would be madness to approach it. During +my residence at Rome, e.g., it was impossible to visit mount +Algidus, whereas at present I have no doubt whatever that +a person may go there without any danger. Capua is +regarded by the ancients as an Etruscan colony, but we have +every reason for supposing that it never was Etruscan. There +is, in all probability, some confusion here between Etruscan +and Tyrrhenian, because the Etruscans occupied the country +of the Tyrrhenians as far as the Tiber, and the name of the +latter must have been confounded with the former; the +other places on the coast, unless they were Greek, were +likewise Tyrrhenian. The name of this Tyrrhenian Capua +is compared by the ancient grammarians with <i>Campi</i>, the +name of the Pelasgian Chaonians. The town was taken, about +the middle of the third century of the Roman era, by the +Oscans, who were pressed onward by the Sabellians. At +that time the district was under the supremacy of Cumae. +But the Oscans did not remain long in the undisturbed +possession of the place; the Sabellians having once established +themselves in Samnium, did not stop short there, +but pressing onward, compelled the Oscans at Capua to +enter into an arrangement with them, and to admit a portion +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_131">[131]</span>of them as epoeci—a phenomenon not unusual in ancient +times. But such an alliance was generally formed with +faithless intentions, and either the ancient inhabitants murdered +the conquerors, or the latter expelled the former: at +Capua the Samnites made themselves masters of the city, +but they seem either to have been expelled by the ancient +population, or else to have become amalgamated with them. +The Oscans had, perhaps, become a commonalty, and afterwards +rose again; in the Roman period, at least, the Oscans +are the ruling people at Capua. The greatness of the city is +well known from Livy: it stood to Rome in the relation of +isopolity; it had not submitted <i>in deditionem</i>, as is erroneously +stated by Livy: its relation to Rome was the +same as that of the ancient Latins, and as a compensation +for the Roman conquests, it received an extension of its +own territory. In these circumstances, Capua could with +satisfaction look upon herself as the second city of Italy; +but she was ambitious enough to wish to become the first, +and with this view, faithlessly entered into an alliance with +Hannibal against Rome, which was then in great distress, +but had not broken its obligations towards Capua. We may +say without hesitation, that Rome was generous towards +Capua, and this was no trifling matter for Rome in its +weakness: Rome then formed alliances which benefited other +people. As Rome had grown and developed immensely, +while the others had remained behind, and as Rome, nevertheless, +acted towards them as before, we cannot help calling +this generous, and the conduct of Capua unjust and ungrateful. +A fearful judgment came upon Capua: it was +not, indeed, destroyed, but the Campanians, especially the +nobles, experienced a terrible fate. The city was afterwards +again filled with all manner of people, and became a +domain of the Roman republic. Subsequently, several unsuccessful +attempts were made to establish a colony there, +until J. Caesar founded one of 5000⁠<a id="FNanchor_39" href="#Footnote_39" class="fnanchor">[39]</a> Roman citizens. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_132">[132]</span>From this time forward Capua was a regular colony, and +remained a respectable town as long as the Roman empire +existed.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Minturnae</span>, near the mouth of the Liris, and <span class="smcap">Sinuessa</span>, +belong to Campania in its wider sense; both are prominent +places in the system of fortifications which the Romans +carried out during the second Samnite war.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Falernian District</span>, between the Vulturnus and +the Liris, probably derived its name from a destroyed town, +Faleria.</p> + +<p>The Oscan towns around Capua probably stood to that +city in the same relation as Latium did to Rome. Among +them I will notice <span class="smcap">Atella</span>, between Capua and Naples, +because the well-known <i>Atellanae</i> originated there. These +Atellane farces are truly analogous to the modern farcical +comedies, the principal personage of which also appeared in +the ancient Atellanae. In a very useful glossary of the Neapolitan +dialect, I found it stated, that the buffoon (<i>pulcinella</i>) +was a real jester who lived 200 years ago; but the fact is, +that he has been the same through the course of many +centuries from the first introduction of the Atellanae.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Acerrae</span> deserves to be mentioned on account of the +cruelty of which Hannibal was guilty towards its senate—the +only cruel act that can be really laid to his charge. +The town was destroyed in the second Punic war, and the +Romans did nothing to restore it, although it had been +faithfully attached to their cause.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Nola</span> was situated at a greater distance from Capua, +and was not one of the Campanian towns properly so +called; it was independent, and in no way subordinate to +Capua. It might be doubted whether it was really an +Oscan town; in Justin it is called a Chalcidian settlement, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_133">[133]</span>and I have no doubt that the whole chapter in which +this occurs is taken from Timaeus. The coins of Nola +have a perfectly Greek character and Greek inscriptions; +this is indeed the case with those of Capua also, though +not in the same degree as with those of Nola. My opinion +is, that these places were originally Tuscan, and that during +invasions of the Oscans and Sabellians, Capua lost this +Tusco-Tyrrhenian character, while Nola retained it longer. +If then the Greeks call the latter place Chalcidian, they do +so because it received Greek, probably Chalcidian, epoeci +from Naples, and not barbarians. All these towns were +situated in the midst of barbarians, who, for the purpose of +commercial transactions, even advanced to the Greek towns +on the coast, and accordingly much more to a place which, +like Nola, was situated in the midst of the country. Nola +was built in that splendid plain of Campania, which extends +between the Vulturnus and Naples: it is a perfect plain, +with quite a volcanic soil; notwithstanding this, however, +it is not dry, but very well watered, and almost marshy, +whence the country abounds in draining canals lined with +poplars. Nola, situated on the other side of mount Vesuvius, +whose torrents of lava never reach so far, forms with +Capua and Naples a triangle. In the second Samnite war +it appears to have been an important town, for it sent 2000 +men to Naples to defend that place against Rome; but in +the course of the same war it was taken by the Romans. +In the Hannibalian war, the fidelity of Nola was of infinite +importance to Rome. At Nola the most beautiful Campanian +vases have been found: they are made of an extremely +fine clay; but they ceased to be manufactured as early as the +time of Augustus, for the art of making them had been +lost. They were made of clay mixed with asphalt, and +then burnt, but so slightly that the asphalt was not changed +by the process, hence the lightness and extraordinary fineness +of the material. The darkness of the colour arises +from the admixture of asphalt. Professor Hausmann of +Göttingen first re-discovered the nature of the composition, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_134">[134]</span>and the experiments he made with it which were perfectly +successful. This is really an interesting discovery, of which +good use might be made, if not in Germany, at least in +Italy. The art had died away to such a degree, that in +Caesar’s time amateurs collected vases from Capua as well +as from Corinth, and even opened tombs for the purpose of +obtaining them. The vases of Arretium continued to be +manufactured in the time of Augustus. The Campanian +vases are not jars containing the ashes of deceased persons, +such as we find elsewhere in tombs: the body was not burnt, +but the skeletons are found in coffins, and on each side of +the coffin, four, six, or eight vases of this kind are set up. +As they were so slightly burnt, they are often found broken +and crumbled, and it is a rare thing to find a large one +preserved entire. They must be treated with great care, +when brought to light and exposed to the atmospheric +air.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Cumae</span> is the most ancient Greek colony in those parts, +though it certainly cannot be as ancient as it is said to be. +In the first edition of my Roman History, I had not sufficiently +considered this point; it is one of the few subjects on +which the objections raised against my view are well +founded. I am now convinced, that the statement of +Timaeus, for to him it belongs, is false. Certain it is, that +Cumae was an ancient Chalcidian colony; but it might +even be doubted whether the Chalcidian towns in Sicily +were not more ancient. When Capua was taken by the +Samnites, Cumae, too, was conquered, and lost its Greek +character: the Greek population, which until then had +formed the ruling class, became subjects; their fate was +that of the American aborigines: they were not indeed +extirpated, but lost their political existence. Gradually +the Italicans spread more and more, and many families +from Campania removed to Cumae, which thus gradually +became Italian. The same also was the fate of Naples, +though not to such a degree. Cumae for a long time ruled +over the whole Phlegraean plain, that is, the Acte between +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_135">[135]</span>the Vulturnus and mount Vesuvius. <i>Dicaearchia</i>, on the +site of the modern Puzzuoli, was then the port town of +Cumae. In the time of king Darius, it was colonised by +Samians, probably in the reign of Polycrates and Syloson.</p> + +<p>Another Greek colony from Eretria had settled in the +island of <span class="smcap">Ischia</span>, which bore the Greek name Αἰναρία. It +is a large extinct volcano, which, however, has repeatedly +been active both in ancient and in modern times; for the +island is remarkable for its internal fire, which is not yet +quite extinct, and is still distinctly perceptible; hence it +also contains hot springs; it is a truly paradise-like place +on account of the fiery character of its whole nature, its +soil, and its vegetation. The Greek colony afterwards +disappears, and the island became Oscan simultaneously +with Cumae.</p> + +<p>Between Ischia and the main land of Naples, there are +several other islands, which were no doubt called <span class="smcap">Pithecusae</span>. +One of them is <span class="smcap">Nesis</span> (the modern Nisita), that +is, the little island (νησίς), a proof showing how early the +modern Greek pronunciation of the η became prevalent. +The ancients do not mention it.⁠<a id="FNanchor_40" href="#Footnote_40" class="fnanchor">[40]</a> Another island was +<span class="smcap">Prochyta</span>. All these islands had Eretrian colonies.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Dicaearchia</span> was a beautiful port, which was, no doubt, +likewise taken by Campanians. After the capture of Capua, +it came into the hands of the Romans, who established a +Roman colony there, and called it <span class="smcap">Puteoli</span>, though this +name may have existed previously. The place then became +the real port of Rome, for Ostia was bad, and the Portus +Romanus on the right arm of the Tiber was not fit for sea-ships. +The port of Puteoli, on the other hand, was naturally +very beautiful, and even in the time of Augustus pains were +taken to make use of the nature of the locality for the +purpose of extending the port. Puzzolano, so excellent as +a cement for water and harbour-works, was ready at hand +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_136">[136]</span>in abundance, and in the greatest perfection. In the +neighbourhood of Rome it is likewise found, but is not so +beautiful; near Centumcellae, it was also employed in +making the harbour, but it had to be conveyed thither from +a distance. Its abundance in the neighbourhood led to +the building of the molo of Puteoli. This <i>moles</i> of Caligula +is in reality not so mad a scheme as it is commonly described: +it was suggested by the wishes of rational people, +but its gigantic extent was the work of madness: when +ever Caligula took up a good idea, he at once turned it +into something irrational. The whole commerce and intercourse +of Rome with her transmarine provinces at that +time was carried on by way of Puteoli; and it was there +that St. Paul landed, for the voyage along the coast from +cape Misenum to the mouth of the Tiber was very dangerous. +The ships of that period were in many respects +excellent, but in others they were very deficient. It must +be supposed that at Puteoli the ships were generally so far +unladen as to enable them to sail into the Tiber at Ostia; +they also found at Puteoli more easily than on the Tiber, +advantageous cargoes to carry back. So long as commerce +supplied only the actual wants, so that there was little or +no speculation, it was carried on by means of large fleets, +or, according to the modern expression, of register vessels. +In this way, Rome received from Egypt her supplies of +corn, glass, linen, and papyrus. Such fleets, however, did +not come from Egypt alone, but also from other quarters, +among which Ionia, for example, is expressly mentioned. +The expression for these fleets is κατάπλους, as we see +from Lucian’s dialogue of this name; but the term is also +quite commonly used by Latin writers of the second and +third century.⁠<a id="FNanchor_41" href="#Footnote_41" class="fnanchor">[41]</a> Puteoli, as a Roman colony, was very +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_137">[137]</span>celebrated on account of its situation and at the same time +as a watering-place. Pope Gregory the Great quite seriously +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_138">[138]</span>thinks that the hot springs of Puteoli are connected with +purgatory.⁠<a id="FNanchor_42" href="#Footnote_42" class="fnanchor">[42]</a>⁠</p> + +<p>The real watering-place, however, was <span class="smcap">Baiae</span>, towards +cape Misenum. It is very remarkable that at present the +district is quite pestilential; if a man were to sleep there +one night during the summer, he would be seized with a +bilious fever, in consequence of the poisonous air. A French +officer, who imagined this to be a mere prejudice, made a +bet that he would sleep in the villa Borghese: he was urgently +requested not to do it, but the next morning he was +quite swollen, and after a few days he died of a putrid +fever. The same is the case at Baiae, and yet the ancients, +as we see from a fragment of Cicero’s speech <i>in Clodium et +Curionem</i>, most commonly stayed there in April, when it is +already dangerous. I have discovered the explanation of +all this, from a conversation with a common man. He said +to me that the nature of the Pontine marshes was a very +strange thing, that it was not possible for any one in summer +to sleep there without fatal consequences, and that it was +the same in many parts of Latium; but, he added, that to +his own knowledge sailors and boatmen, even in the dangerous +season, slept in their boats very near the coast +without injuring their health. This proves that the poisonous +atmosphere does not extend across the water. The +man’s remarks contain a significant hint. I remembered +that the English ambassador, with whom I often took a +walk there—he was not a man of learning—directed my +attention to the fact, that beyond mount Posilipo, in the +midst of the sea, ruins of ancient Roman houses were found, +and he observed that the Romans must have had a singular +taste in thus building houses in the midst of the water, and +connected with the mainland by means of bridges, although +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_139">[139]</span>there was no beauty to attract them. To abandon such a +charming coast, and to build a house in the sea, was, he +thought, a strange fancy. When, afterwards, I heard the +account of the man I mentioned before, the matter ceased +to be a mystery to me. Even at Formiae, and certainly at +Baiae, the Romans built houses into the sea, in order to +isolate themselves from the bad air: these are the <i>moles +jactae in altum</i>, and on them people were safe.</p> + +<p>The country there is indescribably beautiful and charming, +and besides Baiae, the lake <span class="smcap">Avernus</span>, surrounded by very +ancient forests, is likewise a spot of great interest. Near it, +a road has been cut through the rock leading to Cumae. +Such roads were often constructed for the purpose of +shortening the distance and avoiding the heights, for the +Romans generally endeavoured by every means to shorten +the roads. A similar road leads from Naples to Puzzuoli, +likewise made to avoid a hill, which it would be very +difficult to cross: hence the <i>crypta Pausilippana</i>, <i>Puteolana</i>, +<i>Neapolitana</i>.⁠<a id="FNanchor_43" href="#Footnote_43" class="fnanchor">[43]</a> The Avernus was, no doubt, originally called +ἄορνος, and with the digamma ἄϝορνος. This etymology +has been rejected, because it implied the statement that +birds could not fly over the lake, which, it is said, is an +absurdity. But no bird settles there without dying in consequence, +on account of the quantity of carbonic acid which +is exhaled by the earth and the lake; dogs, too, are not safe +there, but men may pass without any danger.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Naples</span>⁠<a id="FNanchor_44" href="#Footnote_44" class="fnanchor">[44]</a> was originally called <span class="smcap">Parthenope</span>, and was, +no doubt, situated on mount Posilipo, towards Nisita, where +the crypta turns towards the cape. Afterwards, <span class="smcap">Neapolis</span> +was built a few miles from it on the other side of the cape; +and it is a mistake to believe that the two places were nearer +each other. Parthenope was a colony of the Eretrians of +Ischia, while Neapolis was a Cumaean settlement with an +admixture of Athenians; and after the establishment of the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_140">[140]</span>latter place, Parthenope was called <span class="smcap">Palaepolis</span>. In the +second Samnite war, Palaepolis was taken by the Romans, +and must have been destroyed, for it entirely disappears; +Neapolis, on the other hand, became a federate town of +Rome, and was treated with kindness. Strabo, however, +relates, that the town was so much distracted by internal +disturbances, as to be obliged to concede the franchise +even to the Campanians, its natural enemies. But notwithstanding +all this, it remained a perfectly Greek city +until the imperial times; this is evident in the reign of +Augustus, evident from a letter of the emperor M. Aurelius +to Fronto, and evident, also, from Petronius; there exists, +moreover, a great number of Greek inscriptions of the third +century. Afterwards, we lose our thread. But the chapel +of the ancient church of S. Rosa at Naples contains Greek +inscriptions of the period when Naples was a free city, under +the protectorate of Byzantium, that is, of the seventh or +eighth century.⁠<a id="FNanchor_45" href="#Footnote_45" class="fnanchor">[45]</a> Traces of Greek words still exist in the +Neapolitan dialect. The Italian word <i>golf</i> is evidently +formed from κόλπος; the gulf of Naples is specially called +<i>the</i> gulf; but the ancients also called it κρατήρ.</p> + +<p>On this gulf, at the foot of mount Vesuvius, were situated +the celebrated towns of <span class="smcap">Pompeii</span> and <span class="smcap">Herculaneum</span>, +remarkable for their destruction and their re-discovery. +Both are called Oscan, though it is said in regard to +Herculaneum, that at an earlier period it was Tyrrhenian. +But from their ruins, especially those of Herculaneum when +compared with those of Roman origin, it is clear that the +place had assumed an entirely Greek character. Pompeii +was conquered by the Romans in the Social War, and there, +too, we can clearly distinguish the ancient Oscan and the +more recent Roman town.</p> + +<p>In ancient times, the bay of Naples was encircled by a +wreath of towns, extending all over the coast from Naples +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_141">[141]</span>to Sorrentum and the promontory of Minerva; but I cannot +trace them here, and must now proceed to the interior +of Italy.</p> + +<h3 id="The_Sabellians_Sabines_Samnites"><span class="smcap">The Sabellians, Sabines, Samnites.</span></h3> + +<p>I am now going to speak of the great Sabellian nation; I +shall treat of it according to its tribes beginning with the +Sabines, who formed the original stock.</p> + +<p>The names <i>Sabini</i> and <i>Sabelli</i> are the same, just as <i>Hispani</i> +and <i>Hispalli</i>, <i>Graeci</i> and <i>Graeculi</i>. The form <i>Sabelli</i> +is either a diminutive or changed by a pleonasm, <i>Sabinulus</i>, +and, with a change of vowel, <i>Sabellus</i>.⁠<a id="FNanchor_46" href="#Footnote_46" class="fnanchor">[46]</a> This nation occupies +a large extent of country in history; but we should be +mistaken, if we were to suppose, that all the tribes included +under the name were pure Sabines and that they alone inhabited +the countries governed by them; for they did not by any +means extirpate the ancient inhabitants when they conquered +a country. According to a tradition admitted by Cato himself, +which contains some truth, but disfigured, the Sabines +had originally come from Amiternum, the highest district +of the Abruzzi, or as we may call them, the real Apennine +Alps. We must not, indeed, understand this, as if the +Sabines had been autochthons there, as has sometimes been +asserted; but the meaning is, that the tribe from which +the different Sabellian cantons issued, came down from +those mountains. The ancients say no more than this, +but later writers have converted it into a genealogical +connection.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_142">[142]</span></p> + +<p>We cannot decide how far the Sabellians constituted +one race with the Opicans and Auruncans, whether they +were akin in a degree like that subsisting between the upper +and lower Germans, the Suabians and Saxons, or the Germans +and Scandinavians, or whether they were as foreign +to each other as the Romans were to the Etruscans. That +they differed from each other, is expressly attested. But +the ancients are too inaccurate in these matters to allow a +careful modern inquirer to accept their statement without +hesitation; and although Varro attests that the Sabines and +Oscans spoke different languages, still we cannot ascertain, +whether he meant only different dialects, or entirely different +languages. In like manner, the extension of the +Sabellians in southern Italy from the Apennines can be +traced only very indefinitely. This much, e.g., is attested, +that the neighbourhood of Beneventum was previously +occupied by Oscans, without their being the original natives +of it; they must have extended even farther upwards into +the country of the Marsians, and must have been expelled +by the Sabines. The name Maluentum shows, that originally +a people of Tyrrhenian origin dwelt between the +Apennines and the valley of the Calore. Before the Sabines +conquered that district, they probably had their abode in +the eastern Apennines. The real and unmixed Sabines +occupied a considerable extent of country; in the narrowest +sense, they did not touch the sea on either side, either the +Adriatic or the Lower Sea, but they extended so far, as to +be separated from the latter only by a narrow strip of land, +from Amiternum to the vicinity of Rome. But they sent +forth branches of their nation which established themselves in +other parts and became great nations.</p> + +<p>The Sabellian people had this peculiarity, that they +formed both distinct tribes and different confederations. +Some of them accordingly, such as the Picentians, were +without any federal relations, while the four tribes dwelling +in the Abruzzi, the Marsians, Marrucinians, Pelignians, and +Vestinians, were on many occasions inseparably united, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_143">[143]</span>and evidently formed a confederation with isopolity, similar +to that subsisting between the Romans and Latins; it was, +no doubt, at the same time, at least a defensive, if not an +offensive, alliance. The supremacy must have belonged to +one of these tribes by rotation, so that each of them may +conveniently be called a canton. They stand completely +by themselves, and without any connection with the mother +people, the Picentians, Samnites, etc. This isolation of the +Sabellian tribes was their misfortune. The Marsians and +their allies never assisted the Samnites, but allowed themselves +to be captivated by the Romans, by favourable terms, +first to remain neutral, and afterwards to become their +allies. Nor can the Samnites be regarded as a compact +nation in their struggles against Rome; if this had been +the case, they would unquestionably have offered a very +different resistance, for they had a large population and an +extensive territory. The Samnites, like the northern tribes, +formed a confederation, but their bond of union was +scarcely closer than that among their neighbours: they +formed perfectly distinct states, which joined one another +for a common purpose. The Hirpinians, Caudines, and +Pentrians certainly formed a confederation; but the Frentanians +did not, strictly speaking, belong to this union; +they separated at an early time. To these we must add a +fifth Samnite state, to which Nuceria Alfaterna belonged; +its name is unknown, though it was perhaps called +Alfaterna, and extended from Surrentum to the Silarus. +Scylax of Caryanda clearly proves, that this district, from +Surrentum to the Silarus, before it was occupied by Greeks, +was inhabited by Samnites, and the same is manifest from +Livy’s account. When the Romans penetrated there, Nuceria +was a Samnite town, and they conquered it as such. +In this manner we have, exclusive of the Frentanians, who +took no great part in the second Samnite war, four Samnite +cantons, which were very populous. In no map are the +Caudines mentioned as a tribe, but that they were one is +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_144">[144]</span>clear from Strabo and Velleius; manuals of geography and +maps mention Caudium only as a town.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Lucanians</span> proceeded from the Samnites, but became +quite independent of them. The connection with the +mother-country was extremely loose with all these people; +their migrations are quite different from those of other +nations: they are conquests of emigrating bands of men, +who for this reason lose their language and national character, +and adopt those of the old inhabitants. According +to a tradition, the Lucanians emigrated from Samnium as a +<i>ver sacrum</i>. This phenomenon occurs among all the Italian +nations: a people made a vow, that all boys born within a +certain year should, after the lapse of twenty years, emigrate +and seek a new home for themselves. Thus the Lucanians +emigrated, and spread from the frontiers of Samnium as far +as Rhegium on the straits of Messina. The ancient inhabitants +were subdued, and thus three strata of different +nations were mixed together: the ancient Oenotrians were +conquered by the Oscans, and the Oscans by the Samnites. +But these subjects afterwards rose against their rulers, and +formed an independent state under the name of <span class="smcap">Bruttium</span>. +The Bruttians, therefore, did not belong to the Sabellians; +they must be regarded as a mixture of Oenotrians and +Greeks, and were Greek rather than Italian, whence they +were treated by the Romans as Greeks. The Greek +language was so firmly established there, that in Terra di +Lecce, about Otranto, documents were composed in the +Greek language as late as the fifteenth century; specimens +of it occur in the Biblioteca Barberini. In the town of +Rossano in Calabria, Greek was spoken as late as the sixteenth +century,⁠<a id="FNanchor_47" href="#Footnote_47" class="fnanchor">[47]</a> and in Sicily Greek poetry was written +in the twelfth; when the Arabs were expelled the remaining +population consisted of Greeks, and it was not till +a later period that they became Italians. The praetor of +Messina was, ever since the Greek times, called <i>Stratigo</i>, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_145">[145]</span>until in 1672⁠<a id="FNanchor_48" href="#Footnote_48" class="fnanchor">[48]</a> the people revolted against Spain, when the +constitution and the office were abolished. The laws of +king Roger and of Frederic II. were written in Greek.</p> + +<p>In this manner, the component parts of the Sabellian +nation, from the Picentians down to the Lucanians, presented +different shades of their national character. The Sabine blood +in some of them was probably not of more importance than +the Frankish blood is among the modern French; for the +20,000 Franks of king Clovis were easily lost among the +millions of Gauls. In our neighbourhood on the Rhine, +however, the population is almost entirely Frankish, as the +Franks settled here in great multitudes. The population +here on both sides of the Rhine, and as far as the low +German dialect is spoken, that is, as far as Andernach, is +descended from the Ripuarian Franks. In the Netherlands +also, there are Franks, but strongly mixed with Gauls, +Batavian and Frisian tribes; still, however, the population +is more Frankish than in France, and in northern France +it is more so than in the south; from the Loire to Gascony +only the lords of the land are Franks. In Languedoc, there +was only a French garrison, and the remaining population, +for centuries, remained Gothic. Although, therefore, the +Franks extended even beyond the Pyrenees, their race, from +the Main to Spain, presented very great differences. The +country now called Franconia, scarcely contains any Franks +at all. We cannot wonder, therefore, at the fact that in +antiquity the Lucanians and the Sabines of Reate did not +understand one another.</p> + +<p>The constitution of the Sabellian nations seems to have +been essentially democratic, so that in the course of time +the subjects acquired the full right of free country people. +This nation, then, in point of manners and character, was +extremely respectable, and this is the special glory of the +ancient Sabines, Marsians, and of the Samnites with their +confederates; the Picentians and Lucanians are less deserving +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_146">[146]</span>of this praise. The Latin poets, from Virgil to Juvenal, +always set forth the former, when they want to describe the +frugal Italian mode of living. If the nation had but formed +one compact state, it would not have been too weak at +all. The Samnites had as many free citizens as the Romans +and Latins, but although their forces were numerically +equal to those of the Romans, still there was this difference, +that they did not form one body. There can be no +question that the different cantons had the supreme command +by rotation, and this constituted their great weakness +in the conflict with Rome, for in courage and perseverance +the Samnites were assuredly not wanting. Even when in +one year they gained great advantages they were useless, as +in the next year the command belonged to another nation. +C. Pontius was the only man among the Samnites capable +of governing a state: he might have saved his country, if it +had trusted him unconditionally—the Romans would, no +doubt, have raised him to the consulship year after year. +But it would seem that he had the supreme command +only in one town—he was probably a Caudine—while in the +next year the Pentrians had the management of affairs. Other +men did much, sacrificed everything, and dreaded nothing, +but he alone had the power of saving his country. To what +extent their country was ravaged, may be seen from the newly +discovered fragments of Polybius, in which Pyrrhus, on +entering Samnium, is described as terrified at the devastation +of the country: the Romans had ravaged it in such a +manner, that all traces of human habitations had disappeared: +it was just what Peloponnesus is at present,⁠<a id="FNanchor_49" href="#Footnote_49" class="fnanchor">[49]</a> consisting of +heaps of ruins and ashes, the villages were destroyed, trees +were torn up, and not a trace of agriculture or the plough +was left. All this the Samnites bore with inflexible determination; +their desperate courage several times brought +matters to a turning point, but they lacked the greatest of +all things, the courage to sacrifice their prejudices and to +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_147">[147]</span>change their constitution in such a manner as to adapt it to +the circumstances of the time. Their descendants, in the +Marsian or Social War, discovered their mistake, and adopted +a new constitution; from the little we know of it, we must +infer, that it was extremely well devised: it seems to have +resembled that of the United States of America, concentrating +the nation in regard to foreign enemies, but leaving +the municipal sovereignty untouched. It is a pity that we +do not know more about it; still, however, many things +can be conjectured.</p> + +<p>Of all the towns in the country of the Sabines proper, +<span class="smcap">Cures</span> is most renowned in tradition. The country of the +Sabines, beginning at the Anio, extends beyond Amiternum, +and consists of several divisions. The portion between the +Nera and Anio is a hilly country; it is most adapted to the +cultivation of olives, which, if well taken care of, would +produce there excellent oil; corn, too, can be grown there, +but it is unfavourable to the cultivation of the vine, whence +Sabine wine was considered bad by the ancients, and is so still. +In the angle descending towards Rome, the ancients mention +no important towns; but farther up, we come to <span class="smcap">Reate</span> +and <span class="smcap">Interamna</span>. Reate is said to have been a very ancient +place of the Aborigines, that is, the Prisci, and to have +been taken from them by the Sabines. Near Reate the +olive-growing district rises tolerably high into the Apennines. +Lake <span class="smcap">Velinus</span> is situated there in a very wide +hollow; it is said formerly to have been several miles in +circumference, like lake Fucinus. When Curius Dentatus +conquered that district for the Romans (463), he executed +one of the most magnificent works in the world. He drew +off the water from the lake in such a manner as to gain +thereby several square miles of the most beautiful land; and +at the same time the beautiful waterfall of Terni was formed. +The crater of the lake is shut up on one side by the lofty +Apennines, and on the other by a ridge of rock, which +confined the river. Curius, therefore, according to a statement +in one of Cicero’s letters, cut through the ridge which +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_148">[148]</span>separated the river from the Nera. The level of this canal +was from 130 to 140 feet above the river, and this gave rise +to the matchless cascade, of course without any intention on +the part of Curius, for it was not his object to create beautiful +scenery. A person who has seen that waterfall, can no +longer take any pleasure in that of the Rhine, near Schaffhausen. +Every one knows the canal through the rock, +for thousands of travellers visit the falls of Terni, and +generally drive about a mile further to lake Lugo for the +purpose of hearing the beautiful echo. I visited it accompanied +by my friend Brandis; I knew what is generally +known in Italy, though not so generally in Germany, that +there is a cutting through the rock, and I said to our guide +that I wanted to go up the canal as far as the lake. The +man made difficulties, saying that it was not a road for +gentlemen, but fit only for rustics. But I insisted on carrying +out my plan, and we thus came to the canal which is +cut through the rock at an immense depth. When the +man observed that we were interested in it, he said, I will +take you to see another curiosity, which no one goes to see, +if the road is not too difficult for you. It was a Roman +bridge, the existence of which was then altogether unknown: +it consists of a single arch, and is a splendid work constructed +of large blocks without any cement—a work like +the cloacae; there can be no doubt that this bridge also is +a work of Curius. It is not mentioned in any book of +travel. The same guide told us that the people of Reate +and Terni once had a law-suit about an aqueduct, and that +the former applied to Cicero, and the latter to an advocate of +the last century:⁠<a id="FNanchor_50" href="#Footnote_50" class="fnanchor">[50]</a> a remarkable instance of the manner in +which legends arise.</p> + +<p>The frontier of the Sabines proper extends from the Anio +to the Apennines, and the people in that part are called +simply the Sabines. Here we have to take into consideration +the tradition, that they did not originally inhabit the +country south of Reate, but that they overpowered the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_149">[149]</span>ancient inhabitants of the Ausonian race. In the early +history of Rome, these Sabines are of great importance; +they are one of the constituent elements of Rome, and the +Sabine settlements on two of the Roman hills formed part of +ancient Rome. Afterwards too they act a prominent part, +for during the first sixty years after the expulsion of the +kings Sabine wars are frequently mentioned. It is true, +that history contains much that is apocryphal, but the +fact that there were wars with the Sabines is certain, only +we must not imagine that all the Sabines took part in +them. We cannot suppose that the Sabines of Amiternum +sent their troops to the Tiber, any more than we can +assume that, during the Volscian wars, the more distant +towns of the Volscian nation took part in them. After the +time of the decemvirate, and perhaps even before, the Romans +had established with them the same relation of isopolity, +which had already existed in the third century, but had +been broken up. It was then restored, perhaps even survived +the Gallic calamity, and continued until 463, when +M’ Curius conquered the Sabines. After this subjugation, +we read in our meagre accounts <i>Sabinis civitas data est</i>, +which is the <i>civitas sine suffragio</i>. At the end of the first +Punic war, the Sabines were constituted as two tribes, +whose names, Quirina and Velina, alone clearly show that +they consisted of Sabines. From this it is generally inferred, +that the whole nation then obtained the full +franchise; but this supposition is inconsistent with what we +read in Livy (xxviii. 45) about the preparations of Scipio. +This passage is one of the most suggestive in regard to +Roman affairs: I have often referred to it, and shall often +have to return to it; it clearly shows, which towns had the +Roman franchise, and which were only federate towns. +Reate and Amiternum are there mentioned in the same +relation as the Umbrians, Etruscans, Marsians, and Pelignians; +they supported Scipio in his undertaking by voluntary +contributions and by recruiting for him, which would +not have been possible, if they had had the franchise. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_150">[150]</span>Napoleon treated dependent nations far more severely than +the French themselves, but the Romans were nobler in +this respect, and as they were the rulers, they also considered +themselves bound to make exertions which they +did not expect from their subjects. In many respects it +was far more advantageous to be a Roman ally than to be +a Roman citizen. There were towns on which no demands +were made until the end of a campaign, because it would +have been contrary to their privilege; and the <i>coloniae +maritimae</i> often became really impertinent in insisting upon +their privileges.</p> + +<p>I have little to say about the towns in the country of +the Sabines proper. The most important among them are +<span class="smcap">Reate</span> and <span class="smcap">Amiternum</span>, neither of which has a history +of any consequence. It is said that there still exist considerable +ruins of Amiternum, but I have not seen them. +It was the birth-place of the historian Sallust. The fact +that, during the seventh and eighth centuries, Roman +authors arose in this as in the Oscan districts, is a proof +how easy the transition from their language into the Latin +must have been; not one Roman author arose in Etruria.</p> + +<p>The other parts of the Sabine country are high and +mountainous; they have a true Alpine character, with all +the peculiar vegetation of the Alps; even Icelandic moss +grows there. As to the constitution of the Sabines and +their union into one state, nothing is known.</p> + +<h3 id="Picenum"><span class="smcap">Picenum.</span></h3> + +<p>The north of the country of the Sabines was occupied +by the Sabellian tribe of the Picentians in the Marca +Ancona, between Abruzzo, the frontier of the Sabines and +Marrucinians, and the Aesis. Their country begins at the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_151">[151]</span>heights on the other side of the Apennines, and slopes +down to the Adriatic, being one of the most beautiful hilly +countries; but it has already something of the character of +northern Italy, and the air is not southern; olives, however, +still grow there, though not of the same beauty, and they +are of a different type. The air and atmosphere are nearly +the same as in Lombardy. Picenum forms the boundary +between Central and Northern Italy.</p> + +<p>According to tradition, this country was originally inhabited +by Pelasgians, and was taken possession of by the +Sabellians at a later period, through a <i>ver sacrum</i>. Such +emigrations took place in consequence of a vow made either +in times of distress, or during the calamities of war; but +sometimes also they were the consequence of over-population. +The emigrants were always guided by divine signs, concerning +which there existed special legends. The Cumaeans +related that their ancestors had been guided by a dove +flying before their ships; others were led by a bull (as +Cadmus to Thebes), the Hirpinians by a wolf (<i>hirpus</i>), and +the Picentians by a woodpecker (<i>pica</i>) which flew before +them. Traces of a longer continuance of the earlier population +in the country may still be distinctly recognised. In +other respects those districts are obscure to us, because the +history of the times in which they acted a part is so obscure, +or rather is entirely lost to us. This is the case, e.g., with +the Picentian war, which was related in the thirteenth book +of Livy, and with the expeditions of Cn. Pompeius Strabo +during the Social War.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Asculum</span>, the capital of the Picentians, was a very large +place, as, according to report, may still be seen from its +ruins. The historical importance of this town belongs to +the Social War, which broke out there; it was here that +the first act of hostility against Rome was committed in a +tumult which broke out in the theatre, and in which the +Romans were murdered. The new fragments from Diodorus, +discovered by A. Mai, throw some light upon these +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_152">[152]</span>events. The town was taken, and we may easily imagine +what was the fate of a place whose inhabitants had imbrued +their hands with the blood of the commissioners of the +senate who were sent to reprimand them. Asculum was +not destroyed, but its fate was probably like that of Capua. +After that time a class of towns in Picenum are mentioned +under the name of <i>praefecturae agri Piceni</i>, from which we +may recognise that Cn. Pompeius Strabo deprived the +Picentians of their municipal institutions, and constituted +them in this new form. This also shows that the Italians +did not gain the franchise as simply as we generally +imagine.</p> + +<p>The Picentians are said to have been a very populous +nation. At the time of their subjugation, after the war +with Pyrrhus, their number is stated to have been 360,000, +which evidently comprises not those alone who were capable +of bearing arms.</p> + +<p>The most important town in that whole country is +<span class="smcap">Ancona</span>, which is the Latin form of the name, the Greek +being Ἀγκών. It is one of the latest Greek settlements, a +truly Greek town, founded by Dionysius in the 100th +Olympiad; but we do not know whether the colonists were +Syracusan exiles, or colonists sent out by Dionysius according +to a definite plan. I am inclined to believe that Dionysius +himself established the colony. The latter period of +the elder Dionysius and the first of the younger are obscure +to us on account of the absence of a regular plan in the +work of Diodorus: he sometimes becomes tired in following +up a history which he has carried through a series of years +with the greatest minuteness; he then passes away from it, +and leaves it out altogether. There does not exist a more +thoughtless writer than this Diodorus of Sicily. Ancona +remained a Greek town for a long time, and continued at +a very late period to be connected with Constantinople, +whence in the twelfth century it placed itself under +the protection of Manuel Comnenus against the emperor +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_153">[153]</span>Frederic I. Ancona is one of the very few ports on that +coast of Italy, and Trajan increased this advantage by +building the molo which still exists.</p> + +<p>A people mentioned under the name of <span class="smcap">Praetutii</span> +bordered on Picenum; there is great uncertainty about +them, and it is not clear, whether they were Sabines, or +whether they belonged to the ancient Tyrrhenian population. +The town of <span class="smcap">Hadria</span>, from which the sea derives its name, +was situated there.</p> + +<h3 id="The_Upper_Confederation"><span class="smcap">The Upper +Confederation of the Marsians, Pelignians, Marrucinians, and +Vestinians.</span></h3> + +<p>The four Sabine tribes of the upper confederation occupied +the country from the hills, which form the watershed between +the Liris and the Vulturnus, to the Adriatic. They +formed together one confederate state, and their connection +is repeatedly alluded to in our authorities, as, for example, +in Polybius, where he enumerates the Italian contingents +levied against the Cisalpine Gauls; and in Ennius where we +read <i>Marsa manus, Peligna cohors, Vestina virum vis</i>. At +the time when the Vestinians declared for the Samnites, +and the Romans wished to overcome them by a sudden +attack, Livy remarks that the Romans ought to have considered +that, by attacking the Vestinians, they would also +make the Marsians, Marrucinians, and Pelignians their +enemies. They were united as a confederation, in the same +manner as the Romans were united with the Latins and +Hernicans. In regard to origin, they were the same as the +far ruling Samnites, but in their political system they were +entirely different from them. Once only, in the second +Samnite war, they hesitated as to whether they should not +join the Samnites against the Romans; but the latter +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_154">[154]</span>succeeded in preventing it. It was the consequence of the +fatality by which the Romans were destined to become the +rulers of Italy, that the Marsians began to move during +the interval between the second and third Samnite war: +it was then a piece of folly on their part, which they had +reason bitterly to repent; they ought to have done so +before, and to have joined the Samnites. They were subdued +and had to submit to hard terms, though afterwards +the Romans again placed them in an honorable position, in +which they remained until the outbreak of the great Marsian +or Social War. There existed various causes, why +they separated themselves from the Samnites, so that the +latter did not obtain the support which, had the others not +been infatuated, ought to have been given to them. It has +often been observed, that people of quite different religions +do not hate one another as much as those belonging to +different sects of the same religion, even though their +differences should be slight, nay the more trifling the differences +are, the bitterer is their hatred. Thus, e.g., in France +the Jansenists and Jesuits, as they are called, are more +embittered against each other, than either of them is against +the Calvinists; the united and non-united Armenians are +enraged against each other, though their difference is only +a formal one not affecting their dogmas. The Samnites and +the other tribes were one nation, but the Samnites had +become great, and hence the unfortunate envy and jealousy +of their less powerful kinsmen. This is the chief reason, +why they formed friendship with the Romans. They had, +however, another reason besides, which afforded them a +specious pretext, and draws a veil over the odiousness of +their conduct. They were mountaineers and a pastoral +people, who, during winter, required pastures for their +sheep which they sent down into the plains of Apulia. +Now, the Romans had succeeded in attaching the Apulians +to their interests and in establishing themselves in their +country. Hence the nations that were not on friendly +terms with Rome, were excluded from the winter pasture +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_155">[155]</span>in Apulia. If the Marsians and their confederates had +entertained different sentiments, they would have resolved, +in conjunction with the Samnites, to expel the Romans +from Apulia, which might have been a matter of no great +difficulty.</p> + +<p>I have shown in the first volume of my Roman History, +that these four tribes belonged to the Sabine race: in regard +to the Pelignians it is clear from Ovid, and the scholiast +on the Aeneid proves it in regard to the Marsians. Each +of these four tribes was in its own territory sovereign and +independent; each also may have been subdivided, but in +their relation to foreign countries they formed one state. +In speaking of their separation from the Samnites, I was +obliged to mention their disgraceful faithlessness, but this +does not detract from their worth in other respects. It is +acknowledged on all hands, that on account of their extraordinary +and antique simplicity and frugality, they +belonged to the most respectable nations of Italy; these +virtues were preserved there at a time when the other +Italians had long sunk into degeneracy, and when the Romans +had completely abandoned the severe manners of +their ancestors. This is the praise bestowed upon them by +Virgil and even by Juvenal; the latter may in his expressions +be alluding to earlier poets, but he could not +possibly have written in the manner in which he has done, +unless at least a shadow of the ancient manners had been +preserved there. They were at the same time extremely +industrious; their country was for the most part mountainous; +agriculture was indeed carried on in the valleys, +but it was not very productive, and the greater part of +the country was pasture land. They had no wealth; but +their strength lay in their contentment. Their valour was +not less celebrated than the simplicity of their manners, +and this feature too procured them the greatest respect +among all the Italian nations; thus Ovid boasts of the <i>miles +Pelignus</i>, his countryman. The Romans had a proverb +saying, that they never triumphed over them and never +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_156">[156]</span>without them. The former part of this saying may be an +exaggeration, for there can be no doubt that they were +conquered in the third Samnite war; it is possible, however, +that no triumph over them was celebrated; Livy does +not mention it, and the Triumphal Fasti of that period are +lost.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Marsians</span> dwelt about lake <i>Fucinus</i> (Lago di Celano), +which is as clear as crystal, and is formed by the confluence +of small brooks and subterraneous springs; Virgil calls it +<i>vitrea unda</i>, and elsewhere it is described as <i>pellucidus lacus</i>. +There is no visible outlet of its waters; they rise at intervals +of several years, and decrease again. It must discharge its +waters somewhere by subterraneous passages, which, we do +not know how, sometimes close and then open again. When +these passages are closed, the lake rises, overflows its banks, +and covers large and beautiful tracts of country. In order +to prevent such devastations, the emperor Claudius attempted +to construct an immense canal to the Liris. The first +attempt, however, failed on account of the great distance; +a second succeeded for a time, but the canal then became +obstructed. Before the time of the French revolution, +renewed efforts were made to restore it, as the lake was +greatly increasing; but while I was in Italy it decreased, +and afterwards continued to do so still more; more than a +Roman mile of land has thus been left dry, whence we must +infer that new outlets have been opened. Many interesting +antiquities have been found there.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Marruvium</span> was the capital of the Marsians, who themselves +were sometimes called after it <i>Marruii</i> or <i>Marruvii</i>. +It was taken by the Romans and changed by them into a +Roman colony; it is remarkable for being the northernmost +town in those parts that has Cyclopean walls. Petit-Radel +has inferred from this, that the Pelasgian race extended to +those districts, but I cannot decide as to whether he is right +or wrong. He has very confused ideas about the ancient +nations, and is, therefore, little qualified to pronounce +judgment; still, however, it is possible that he may be right.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_157">[157]</span></p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Pelignians</span>, the second tribe in the northern +Sabellian confederation, are mentioned with the same praise +as the Marsians. If we had Livy’s work complete, we +should know more of their valour than what is related +about the Pelignian cohort in the second Samnite war. As +it is, their greatest glory consists in having produced Ovid, +not to acknowledge whose merits as a poet would be a +sign of narrowmindedness or prejudice. He was a native +of <span class="smcap">Sulmo</span>, which he calls <i>Peligni pars tertia ruris</i>. It +would, therefore, seem that, as elsewhere in Italy the towns +of the same tribe formed one community, so each country +contained a number of places, representing a similar division. +The country of the Pelignians accordingly was divided into +three parts. The second town was <span class="smcap">Corfinium</span>, which, in +the Marsian war, became the capital of the Italicans under +the name of <i>Italica</i>. It has now disappeared, but Sulmo +still exists under the name of Sulmona.</p> + +<p>The capital of the <span class="smcap">Marrucinians</span> was <span class="smcap">Teate</span>, which +is at present only a small insignificant place; in ancient +times it was great, as we must infer partly from statements +in ancient authors, and partly from its ruins. The Teatine +monks derive their name from the circumstance that their +monastery was at Teate. We have a tolerable number of +coins of this town. The family of the Asinii, especially +Asinius Pollio, the most celebrated of them, were Marrucinians.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Vestinians</span> had no towns of any name, and seem +to have been the weakest among the four tribes; it is either +for this reason that they are least spoken of, or because +they were inferior to the others in character and moral +worth.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_158">[158]</span></p> + +<h3 id="The_Samnites"><span class="smcap">The Samnites.</span></h3> + +<p>The real name of this nation in Oscan was <i>Sauini</i> or +<i>Savini</i>. On the denarii which were coined during the +Social War, we read on the one side <i>Safinim</i>, a genitive +plural, and on the other <i>C. Papi Mutil</i>, the name of the +celebrated Samnite commander. The Papii were as important +a Samnite gens as the Cornelii among the Romans. +I will not decide whether the name <i>Safinim</i> applies to the +Samnites alone or to the whole Sabellian race, as all the +Sabellian tribes took part in the insurrection of the Social +War. In Greek they are called Σαυνῖται, and their country +Σαύνιον, formed from the same root as the Oscan name. +Scylax of Caryanda, who, as you remember, lived at the +time of Philip of Macedonia, says of the Samnites: διήκουσιν +ἀπὸ θαλάσσης εἰς θάλασσαν, that is, from the upper to the +lower sea. On the upper sea we find the Frentanians whom +Strabo reckons among the Samnites; Samnites also were the +ruling people in the country about Herculaneum, Pompeii, +and the cape of Minerva as far as the frontiers of Lucania. If +we follow the traces which occur in Livy, the country of +the Samnites is more extensive also in the north and south +than we find it in our maps, even those of D’Anville. It +here becomes very manifest how insufficient a single map is to +form correct boundary lines. Thus Samnium, in the map +of D’Anville, whom I name here only <i>honoris causa</i>, is quite +unsatisfactory; there ought to be a whole series of Maps to +show the different boundaries at different times. The +geography of towns, however, may be studied from a single +map. It is utterly impossible for a man attentively studying +ancient history with D’Anville’s map before him, to form +a clear notion of Samnium. Its extent in that map +does not refer to any particular time at all, though it +answers most to the Augustan region of that name, but it +does not it exactly represent either. According to Livy, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_159">[159]</span>the Apulians, when pressed by the Samnites, threw themselves +into the arms of the Romans; the Samnites had +captured Luceria and conquered several places in the Apulian +high lands, nay, they had extended their possessions as far +as Venusia and Acheruntia, but were repelled by the victorious +Romans. In the west, too, we meet with Samnites; +Fregellae had been taken by them from the Volscians, but +was afterwards likewise taken possession of by the Romans. +In like manner we find Sora, and even Casinum, in the +hands of the Samnites. The case of the latter town is +mentioned by an author in whose work we should hardly +look for it, and yet it is a statement which ought not to escape +the notice of an historian. The historical inquirer must also +examine the grammarians whose works contain facts of the +greatest historical importance in fragments and accidental +quotations. Such is the case, e.g., in the commentary +of Servius and the scholiast on Juvenal;⁠<a id="FNanchor_51" href="#Footnote_51" class="fnanchor">[51]</a> it is, however, +not only in writers of this class and in Festus that we may +expect historical statements, but we find them in the authors +of real grammars, such as Nonius, Diomedes, and Priscian; +they contain much that is of value and ought not to be +despised. Such also is the case here, for it is Varro who, +in his work “De Lingua Latina,”⁠<a id="FNanchor_52" href="#Footnote_52" class="fnanchor">[52]</a> states, that Casinum +was inhabited by Samnites. Hence we see that they +extended as far as the neighbourhood of Arpinum and +Monte Cassino, and that they had subdued the whole +district between the upper Vulturnus and the upper Liris. +It was, therefore, for the purpose of extending their +dominion in that part, that they undertook the war against +the Sidicines.</p> + +<p>The Samnites, as we have seen, did not form a compact +nation, they were not united by one capital, they had no +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_160">[160]</span>permanent government to keep the whole together, and +they formed no <i>civitas</i>, but a <i>populus</i>, not a πόλις, but an +ἔθνος. They consisted of four or five different tribes, which +were not more closely united with one another than +the Romans, Latins, and Hernicans, or even not more +closely than the Romans, Latins, and Volscians of Ecetrae +were at various times. Thus it happened that the Frentanians, +though a Samnite people, concluded, during the +second Samnite war, a separate peace with Rome and +allowed her armies a passage through Abruzzo into Apulia. +Velleius Paterculus states, that on one occasion the Romans +were defeated by the Caudines alone, and in the Triumphal +Fasti we read, that a general triumphed <i>de Samnitibus +omnibus praeter Pentros</i>. So long as the Romans stood on +a footing of equality with the Latins and Hernicans, the +Samnites were able to keep them within due bounds; but +when they themselves had assisted the Romans in reducing +the Latins to the condition of subjects, the compactness of +the Roman state was against them, and they were no longer +equally matched. No wonder, therefore, that they succumbed +to the Romans; but it is surprising to find that, +after all, they were able to hold out in a struggle like the +second Samnite war, which lasted twenty-four years and +a half. And notwithstanding this, they rose again with +the force of despair, which hopes for nothing and destroys +its own existence.</p> + +<p>We must conceive each Samnite tribe to have had its +own senate, from which deputies were elected to deliberate +on common affairs, as the Romans and Latins did at the +Feriae Latinae. In this manner the Samnite praetors and +imperators met, perhaps with deputies and the heads of the +senate (<i>decem primi</i>).</p> + +<p>Samnium, in this extended sense, is a country presenting +very different aspects. The part extending on the coast +from Herculaneum as far as the Silarus, belongs, according +to its physical features, most decidedly to southern Italy; +I will not say that it is essentially a Hellenic country, but it +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_161">[161]</span>is like a Hellenic, it is a Tyrrhenian country. It had originally +a Tyrrhenian population, though it was governed by +Samnites, and at an earlier period probably by Oscans. In the +interior, we have the Apennines, a very beautiful mountain +country with some very fertile valleys, and on the whole +such as we generally understand by a mountainous region. +The hills nowhere rise to the height of the Abruzzi, +and nowhere beyond the limits of vegetation; they are +woody mountains, and the forests are for the most part still +preserved. The country of the Frentanians is hilly, and +in no way remarkable.</p> + +<p>The Samnite tribes were distributed in the following +manner:—The <span class="smcap">Frentanians</span> dwelt on the other side of +the Apennines as far as the Adriatic. The <span class="smcap">Pentrians</span> +were the northernmost tribe in the interior, between the +country of the Pelignians and the neighbourhood of Beneventum; +their capital was Bovianum. In the south of them +we have the <span class="smcap">Caudines</span>, who unquestionably possessed the +whole district about the river Calor, a tributary of the +Vulturnus, and Beneventum. The <span class="smcap">Hirpinians</span> dwelt still +farther south, between the Caudines, Lucanians, and Apulians. +On the south-west of the Hirpinians the coast district +extended from mount Vesuvius to the river Silarus; the +Samnites of this last district, as I have already observed, are +not known to us under any certain ethnic name, though it +is probable that they may have been called <i>Alfaterni</i> or +<i>Alfaterini</i>.</p> + +<p>In maps you will find in that district where Salernum +was situated, the name <i>Picentia</i> or <i>Picentini</i>; but this name +does not belong to the early times. Strabo says that they +were transplanted thither as an ἀποδασμὸς of the Picentini +on the upper sea. This must have taken place before the +Hannibalian war, for at that time the Picentians were +among the nations which rose against Rome. This is not +the place for entering into minute discussions, I will only +state, as the result of my inquiries, that this happened after +the Samnite wars. When the Romans conquered that +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_162">[162]</span>district and found it greatly depopulated, they transplanted +the Picentini thither for the purpose of preventing the +communication of the Samnites with the lower sea; for +they might obtain assistance from the Tarentines, with whom +they were on terms of friendship. By the same means, the +very enterprising Agathocles, who would have liked to gain +a firm footing in southern Italy, was kept away from that +coast. The communication with the Lucanians, who were +allied with Rome during the second and third war, also +was kept open in this manner; and it was of great importance +to Rome to maintain this connection.</p> + +<p>Among the Frentanians there is no town worth mentioning.</p> + +<p>Among the Pentrians we have <span class="smcap">Bovianum</span>, which appears +in Roman history at first as a great place; but all +Samnite towns of the interior had this feature in common, +that they were, properly speaking, not fortified. This circumstance +has led to a foolish assertion which occurs in the +writings of some of the ancients, though men like Strabo did +not believe it. The friendship subsisting between the Samnites +and Tarentines gave rise to a wish among the former +to be regarded as kinsmen of the Tarentines, and hence the +fancy that the Samnites were a Lacedaemonian colony. +This singular notion was then supported by accidental circumstances, +as for example, by the fact that the Samnite +towns were open places. There is in reality no trace of a +truly fortified town in all Samnium; but the case of those +towns which the Samnites conquered beyond their own +frontiers is of course different. The Samnite towns were +situated on hills, the sides of which were cut precipitously; +and such a situation may at first have been sufficient; but it +was of no avail against bold and daring enemies like the +Romans, who attacked a place, <i>cingebant corona</i>, and then +stormed it by means of ladders. The consequence was, +that Bovianum and other towns, when the Romans were +masters of the country around, offered no resistance, but +were scaled and devastated. But they soon rose again, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_163">[163]</span>though with smaller houses and of less extent. During the +Samnite wars, Bovianum was destroyed three or four times +in the course of a few years; and hence we may form some +idea as to the condition in which it must have been. But +notwithstanding all this, we again find it as a respectable +town at the period of the Hannibalian war; in that of +Sulla it was entirely destroyed; and he sent a military colony +into the place, because he wanted to punish it, but did not +rebuild it on its ancient site; the new town he founded in the +neighbourhood of the old one was called <i>Bovianum Undecumanorum</i>. +In like manner, he did not restore Faesulae, but +founded Florentia, at some distance on the river Arnus. +At Arretium he followed the same system. At present, +Bovianum is quite an insignificant place; it occupies the +site of the Roman and not of the Samnite town. From +this one example, you may infer the fate of all the Samnite +towns: many of them, the conquest of which is mentioned +by Livy in his ninth and tenth books, entirely +disappear from the earth, so that they are not mentioned +either by Pliny or by Ptolemy. The country is at present +full of towns and villages, but very few of their names are +indicative of their ancient origin. In all Samnium there is +not a single ruin belonging to the period preceding the +Roman dominion. I have not been there, but Count Zurlo, +a Samnite by birth, who has examined his own country very +carefully, has assured me that, with the exception of the +few Samnite denarii and some copper coins, no antiquities +older than the Roman dominion are found in all Samnium, +from the extreme frontier of the Pentrians to that of the +Hirpinians; nor are there any tombs which are of such frequent +occurrence in Campania. But it could not have been +otherwise, for the Romans systematically destroyed everything +in that country; otherwise such an utter disappearance +of everything would be unaccountable: both during +the third Samnite war and in that of Sulla, the Romans +attempted to extirpate the whole nation. Strabo says that +only ἴχνη πόλεων ἀμαυρὰ were left; and as the nation so +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_164">[164]</span>also its language disappeared. Such was the revenge Sulla +took for the battle at the Colline gate! He not only +butchered the prisoners of war, but after having become +master of Italy, he rooted out the whole population.</p> + +<p>In the country of the Pentrians, there are a few places, +especially on the west of the Vulturnus, concerning which +it is doubtful whether they were properly Samnite, that +is, belonging to the Pentrians, or whether they were Oscan +towns conquered by the Samnites. Places of this kind are +<span class="smcap">Allifae</span> and <span class="smcap">Aquinum</span>⁠<a id="FNanchor_53" href="#Footnote_53" class="fnanchor">[53]</a>⁠, a large town on the Via Latina +and a praefectura Romana, that is, it had the Roman franchise +before its being conferred upon all the Italians, but +the administration was in the hands of a Roman praefectus. +Aquinum was the birth-place of the great poet Juvenal. +A third town was <span class="smcap">Aesernia</span>, which, after the third Samnite +war, became a Roman colony.</p> + +<p>Previously to the second Samnite war, the dominion of +the Samnites extended over the whole district between +the upper Liris and the Vulturnus. They had occupied +Casinum and Fregellae, and the second war broke out, +because the Romans wanted to fortify Fregellae for the purpose +of protecting their own frontier against the Samnites. +The letter of the treaty in this instance was at variance +with reason, for the Samnites in possession of Fregellae +might have become dangerous to Rome herself.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Beneventum</span> was the most important place in central +Samnium, although there can be no doubt that Caudium +gave its name to the people. The Romans changed the name +of the town because of its ominous meaning; for it is said +to have formerly been called <i>Maleventum</i>. But Maleventum +or Maluentum is not a Latin word at all, but has its +origin in the Greek Μαλοῦς, Μαλόεις, Apple-town. This +name too, therefore, shows that Itali (Siculi) dwelt there +before the Oscans. Salmasius, in his “Exercitationes Plinianae” +(a book of which we may well say, φάρμακα πολλὰ +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_165">[165]</span>μὲν ἐσθλὰ μεμιγμένα, πολλὰ δὲ λυγρά), first drew attention +to the etymology of Maleventum. The whole plan of that +book is beneath criticism; it is a real chaos, and we +cannot help being vexed at the careless haste with which +he has put together the most erroneous opinions. But it +contains much information culled from writers which are +otherwise not often read. Salmasius is unfortunate in his +emendations, in mythology and grammar he is bad, though +sometimes he makes a very good remark, as e.g., on the +subject now under our consideration. In the history of +the Samnite wars, Beneventum is but rarely mentioned, +whence it would seem that it was then still an insignificant +place. But the Romans conquered it, and after the third +Samnite war established a colony there, as they generally +did <i>in locis opportunis</i>; and by means of this colony +they in reality broke the power of Samnium. After this +time Beneventum maintained itself by the side of the +sinking Samnite towns, and was of great importance to the +Romans in the Social War. Under the empire it was a +very considerable provincial town, whence there are few +places of which such splendid ruins are extant; among +others we there have a triumphal arch of Trajan.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Caudium</span>, on the road from Capua to Beneventum, must +once have been a considerable town, because it gave its +name to the people. As a town, however, it is scarcely +mentioned, and only Horace in his journey to Brundusium +speaks of <i>Caudi cauponae</i>. This is one of the instances +which we have seen before in the case of Gabii, Fidenae, +and others: on the site of destroyed places afterwards new +ones arose out of inns which were built at stations on the +high-roads. Several Samnite places, which are mentioned +in Livy, but of which the sites cannot be ascertained, may +have been situated there. We can scarcely form conjectures +about them.</p> + +<p>The third Samnite tribe, or, including the Frentanians, +the fourth, are the <span class="smcap">Hirpinians</span>, in the district of the +modern Avellino, inhabiting one of the most beautiful hilly +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_166">[166]</span>countries, between Beneventum, Lucania, and Salernum. It +possesses extraordinary advantages over the northern part of +the territory of Naples in regard to climate, for it is a perfectly +southern country, although its heights are not inconsiderable: +its capital was <span class="smcap">Compsa</span>, about which I have nothing +particular to relate; it was one of the towns that joined +Hannibal, and after having already suffered greatly during +a previous conquest, it was completely razed to the ground +somewhere between the seventh and tenth year of the war. +But as it was afterwards rebuilt, the Romans nevertheless +restored its independence. During the Social War it made +common cause with the Samnite nation.</p> + +<p>The really Greek portion of the Samnite territory is +about the cape of Minerva from Surrentum to Salernum. +On the ridge of this part, between mount Vesuvius and +Salernum, we have <span class="smcap">Nuceria</span>, a very large and flourishing +town, the wealth and character of which are attested by its +extremely beautiful silver coins, which are in no way inferior +to those of Greece.</p> + +<p>I have already mentioned <i>Pompeii</i> and <i>Herculaneum</i> in +speaking of Campania. <span class="smcap">Surrentum</span> is well known as one +of the most enchanting places on the whole face of the +earth. Although the ancients were not as enthusiastic in +their admiration of beautiful scenery as the moderns, still +even among them it was celebrated as a place of indescribable +charms.</p> + +<p>The coast on the bay of Salernum was occupied by the +<span class="smcap">Picentini</span>, whom I have already mentioned, and whom +the Romans had transplanted thither from Picenum after +the Samnite wars. In the earliest times, a great number of +Tyrrhenian places existed on that bay, from which it is +evident that there was in that part a considerable Pelasgian +population, which, though subdued, maintained itself for a +long time.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Salernum</span> was not a place of great importance in antiquity, +but in the history of the middle ages it is celebrated +as the place of residence of the Lombard kings. Until the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_167">[167]</span>Hannibalian war, Salernum and the surrounding country +belonged to the Campanians, for the Romans appeased their +allies of those places on which they had conferred the franchise +without the suffrage, by ceding domain lands to them. +Afterwards Salernum became a Roman colony. The river +Silarus formed the boundary between that part of Samnium +and Lucania.</p> + +<p>On the coast of the most southern part of Samnium, +<span class="smcap">Amalfi</span> arose as a flourishing republic at an early period +of the middle ages, during the time of the Lombards. The +local belief is, that Amalfi was a Roman colony of the +imperial period. For reasons which we can easily imagine, +the opinion became established, that Constantine had +led a Roman colony to Constantinople; and at Amalfi a +tradition sprang up, that a fleet with Roman colonists, +destined for Byzantium, was wrecked on that coast, or +compelled by adverse winds to land, and that the colonists +then established themselves there. This whole story is +neither more nor less credible than so many others about +colonies which were said to have been founded by the +heroes returning from Troy. Amalfi is never before mentioned, +and became important at the time when the Lombards +conquered the interior of the country, and pushed +the inhabitants towards the coast; the people naturally +called themselves Romans as opposed to Lombards and +barbarians. The town, like Naples, was under the direct +protection of Constantinople, and was altogether non-barbarian; +it belonged to the class of free cities, which had +preserved a free Roman municipal constitution, and was +very different from the free cities which arose under German +laws.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_168">[168]</span></p> + +<h3 id="Apulia"><span class="smcap">Apulia.</span></h3> + +<p>The name Apulia, no doubt, signifies the country of the +<i>Apuli</i>. <i>Apulus</i> is of the same formation as <i>Romulus</i>, the same +as <i>Romanus</i>, just as <i>Graeculus</i> is the same as <i>Graecus</i>, etc. +Accordingly, <i>Apulus</i>, <i>Apus</i>, and <i>Apicus</i>, and with a change +of vowel, <i>Opicus</i>, are identical. The Oscan language has +the letter <i>p</i> where the Latin has <i>qu</i> (pronounced as <i>k</i>), and +just as in the Greek dialects π and κ are interchangeable. +<i>Apulus</i>, therefore, is in no way different from <i>Aequi</i>, <i>Aequuli</i>, +<i>Aequani</i>. If we attentively trace the dialects, there is +scarcely any nation which admits such great changes in +them as the Oscan. It is a very correct and ancient law of +logic, “principia praeter necessitatem non esse multiplicanda,” +and in the history of ancient nations, too, it ought +not to be lost sight of. It certainly is true, that sometimes +we recognise the existence of many quite different nations +living close to one another—in the Caucasus and in +America, there are districts of not many square miles, in +which great numbers of languages are spoken, that do not +bear the slightest resemblance to one another; and in like +manner essentially different nations dwell side by side in a +portion of Africa—but we, nevertheless, cannot adopt such +lists of nations as are given by the ancients, for they are not +rationally arranged, and are often without any meaning at all. +The ancients had no interest in forming accurate notions on +such points; when they dwelt upon inquiries of this kind, +matters became almost worse: they then wrote thoughtlessly, +putting down things as essentially different, which seemed to +present ever so slight a difference, and treating as identical +those which were really different. There does not exist a +more singular mass of confusion than in Pliny’s account of +the different nations. I know from experience, how many +stages a man has to pass through before he arrives at positive +certainty upon such questions. Garve very truly says, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_169">[169]</span>“the second is the beginning.” A person assuming that in +Italy everything was originally different, feels as if a wheel +were spinning round in his head; and he soon arrives at the +conviction that his supposition has no meaning, and gives +up the whole matter in despair. I have experienced this +same thing, but did not rest until I arrived at a definite +result. The subject does not suffer from its being confused: +many things are treated with scorn, merely because they are +abused; if things were not represented in a false light, there +would be no danger of things deserving attention ever being +scorned. But it does happen, when things are erroneously +conceived, and are defended with obstinacy, when they +cannot be defended at all. It is the sad but natural consequence +of such a defence of what is opposed to reason and +truth, that many men despise even that which is deserving +of consideration. Hence so many follies. A fancy of this kind +during the period of my youth, was the belief in perfectibility, +when people imagined that in every respect they were +far above their ancestors. But it is an equally great folly +unconditionally to praise our ancestors, and to forget that +there is an endless number of points in which we move +sometimes forward and sometimes backward. The question +whether an entire period is superior or inferior to another, +is of a very different nature, and one which it is difficult to +answer, if it is put in a rational way. I should least of all +wish to exchange the present time for the middle ages, +which fools only praise as the happiest era in history. There +can be no doubt that in the middle ages life was more +intense, sympathies were stronger, and activity was more +vigorous; but our age has other advantages, and our progress +in science especially is immense. When I compare +the moral condition of our age with what it was a hundred +or a hundred and twenty years ago, I cannot hesitate for a +moment, with a full knowledge of all the facts, to say that +our age, not only in Germany, but even in France, is +infinitely better.</p> + +<p>He, therefore, is the true friend of antiquity who disentangles +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_170">[170]</span>it from its confusion and places it in its true light. +The ancients knew but little about the nations of Italy, and +later writers, especially Pliny, knew no more, so that we +cannot even discern how far Cato saw clearly in this matter, +and how far not. He still recognised that the Aborigines +of Latium belonged to a race akin to the Greeks, a fact +which Varro no longer understood. From Fabius down to +Cato and Pliny, the knowledge of the early history of Italy +decreased more and more.</p> + +<p>As all names of countries are derived from those of nations, +as <i>Italia</i> from <i>Itali</i>, <i>Graecia</i> from <i>Graeci</i>, so <i>Apulia</i> is formed +from <i>Apuli</i>. Pliny says that there were <i>tria genera Apulorum</i>: +1. <i>Apuli Teani</i>; 2. <i>Daunii</i>; and 3. <i>Apuli Lucani</i>. From +Strabo, we see that the real Apulians dwelt in the north-west +of Apulia as far as the river Cerbalus: these are the +Oscans. But the Daunians were Itali, dwelling at Arpi +(Argyrippa), a Greek town, and at Canusium. They are +put in connection with the Tyrrhenians, Turnus (the same +as Turinus) being called a son of Daunus. The Daunians +in Apulia, therefore, are the ancient Tyrrheno-Pelasgian +inhabitants of that country, akin to the Peucetians, who +were likewise regarded by the Greeks as Pelasgians. The +Oscans, who did not maintain themselves in their conquests +in Samnium, rose to power in Apulia, and the +Daunians remained in the country as the subject people. +The <i>Apuli Lucani</i> are, doubtless, nothing else than portions +of Apulia, which were peopled either by Lucanians or by +Samnites, and, therefore, at all events, by a Sabellian race; +in these parts, the ancient Itali were governed by them, so +that a Samnite-Oscan population was the ruling people, whose +subjects originally consisted, for the most part, of Itali, with +whom, however, some Oscans also may have been mixed. +Whether these Lucanians had proceeded from the already +constituted nation of the Lucanians, or directly from Samnium, +is a question which can no longer be answered. The +chaos is, I hope, cleared up by this explanation. Apulia +furnishes rich materials for ethnography, and far more +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_171">[171]</span>than Samnium which is otherwise a much more splendid +country.</p> + +<p>Apulia has the form of a theatre (Greek geographers +would call it θεατροειδές). The Greeks called it Iapygia, +though this name embraces a greater extent of country, all +Messapia and Calabria being included, so that Tarentum +also belonged to Iapygia. The name <i>Iapyx</i> again is only +a dialectic variety of <i>Apulus</i>. The Latin termination icus +is in Oscan <i>ix</i>, as we see in <i>Meddix Tutix</i>, the title of the +highest magistrate, which the Romans changed into <i>Maddix +Tuticus</i>: hence <i>Iapicus</i> = <i>Apicus</i> = <i>Opicus</i>. When I repeatedly +direct your attention to view this point rightly, I do not +do so from distrust, but because I know, from my own +experience, how difficult it is to make up one’s mind to +believe that Iapygia and Apulia are the same name. I +myself have long been mistaken about this, and did not see +the truth until I became familiar with the remains of the +Oscan language, and was thus enabled to establish the +etymology.</p> + +<p>Apulia is surrounded by a semicircle of not very high +hills, beginning with mount Garganus on the Adriatic, continued +by the chain of the Apennines, and then separating +Apulia from Samnium and Lucania. Afterwards this +range terminates in low hills towards Terra di Lecce. +The inner part of the semicircle, containing the thymele, +orchestra, and stage, is formed by the plain of Apulia, a +chalk country, like Champagne or the kingdom of Leon in +Spain. It is, however, not a perfect plain, but has small +elevations (<i>verrucae</i>); it has very few rivers, the springs not +being able to break through the ground. As the chalk lies +in strata, the waters are drawn down towards a few rivers, +which traverse the plains without being fed by tributaries, +just like the Minho and Douro in the kingdom of Leon, +and the Aisne, Marne, and Seine in Champagne. The +<span class="smcap">Aufidus</span> is a very powerful river, its bed is cut very deep; +in summer its water is low, but during the winter every +shower of rain swells it immensely. The plain through +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_172">[172]</span>which it flows is a barren chalk-field; water is found there +by boring very deep wells, so that the country requires +much rain. After a good rain in the autumn, the land +covers itself with excellent and extremely rich grass. In +some parts where irrigation is possible, where the soil is a +little mixed, and where it is carefully tilled by man, the +country is excellent for growing corn, which ripens at an +extremely early season. An intimate friend of mine at +Naples was intendant of Apulia, and from him I learned +that the harvest of wheat in Apulia takes place about the +end of May, that is, three weeks earlier than at Athens, +where the 20th of June is the harvest season, a fact which +it is of importance to know in reading Thucydides, who +often describes the season of the year by mentioning the +harvest-time. About the foot of the hills, Apulia is +altogether barren, at least at present, but I cannot say +whether the same was the case in antiquity. The country +is now for many miles covered with nothing but ferula and +ferns.</p> + +<p>Western Apulia, which Pliny calls by the name of <i>Teani +Apuli</i>, the country of the real and genuine Apulians, is +of very little importance in history. The towns of Apulia +mentioned in history, belong to the Daunians. Apulia +was not a politically united country, it presents even less +of national unity than Samnium, for it contained several +systems of towns which were quite independent of, and even +hostile to, one another. Arpi and Canusium were the most +important towns, and the others seem to have been grouped +around them.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Arpi</span>, in Greek, Ἀργυρίππα, shows by its name its +Pelasgian origin; it is the same as Argos. Some indeed +call it Ἄργος Ἵππιον, but this name occurs but rarely, and +it is doubtful whether it is a genuine ancient name, or +whether it arose from later etymological speculations. Arpi +was the first place that joined the Romans. All the Apulian +coins have Greek inscriptions; those of Arpi bear the +inscription ΑΡΠΑΝΩΝ, but in point of artistic execution, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_173">[173]</span>they are not quite Greek, and those who have eyes for such +things cannot fail to discover a peculiar character. Other +works of art also have been dug out of the ground in Apulia, +and those who have practised eyes do not find it difficult +to distinguish bronzes of Apulia from those of Lucania. +Those of Apulia are extremely beautiful in their way, but +still have something strange about them. In the days of +Strabo it was still possible to perceive, from the vast circumference +of the walls, that Arpi had once been a large place, +but it was deserted. You cannot conceive a greater contrast +than that between Samnium and Apulia: in the latter +country all the towns were fortified with walls and other +works, while in Samnium they were protected by nature +against hostile attacks. The fidelity of Arpi during the +second Samnite war was rewarded by the Romans with +large possessions, but in the Hannibalian war it received its +fatal blow. At present it has entirely disappeared. Apulia +has, on the whole, very few ruins, which is the consequence +of the soft chalk-stone, of which all monuments were +made, and which cannot stand against the influence of the +weather.</p> + +<p>We should not believe that <span class="smcap">Canusium</span> was a town of +such importance, were it not expressly attested by Strabo, +that Apulia was divided between Arpi and Canusium. In +Livy, it appears as an insignificant place. We may also +infer from Strabo, that during the second Samnite war, it +was at the head of the Apulian towns which had joined +the Samnites, while Arpi sided with the Romans. After +the battle of Cannae, the Romans, by an inconceivable +carelessness on the part of Hannibal, were enabled almost +under his very arrows to retreat to the walls of Canusium, +where they rallied and then proceeded to Venusia. In the +second Punic war, Canusium does not appear to have been +hostile to Rome; in the Samnite war, as I have already +observed, it supported the Samnites, but the whole country +afterwards submitted to the Romans on terms which were +by no means unfavourable. Still, however, they revolted +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_174">[174]</span>during the war with Pyrrhus: it cannot be accurately +traced what influence this step had on their fate. The +town suffered severely in consequence of both its revolt +from Rome and from the hostility of the Carthaginians, and +the Apulian towns did not easily recover after being once +destroyed. In the time of Strabo, it was a deserted place, +large walls enclosing a number of decayed houses. In this +light the town also appears in Horace’s journey to Brundusium. +It is now called Canosa.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Sipontum</span> and <span class="smcap">Salapia</span> belonged to the territory of +Arpi. The name Sipontum (Σιποῦς) betrays its Tyrrhenian +origin. All these places suffered severely during the Hannibalian +war. When the Romans punished Arpi for its +revolt, they deprived it of the dominion over these towns, +and sent a colony to Sipontum. The neighbourhood of +Sipontum is a salt plain and therefore unhealthy.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Luceria</span> was situated on the height between Arpi and +Beneventum. It was an Apulian town, but was captured +by the Samnites, as I have clearly ascertained, and was afterwards +taken from them by the Romans, and changed into +a Romano-Latin colony. The establishment of this colony +in so distant a country is one of the bold measures of the +Romans, whereby, after the long struggle, in which even +the greatest exertions proved unsuccessful, they decided the +final issue of their war against the Samnites.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Venusia</span> was another great creation of the Romans; it +is uncertain whether it belonged to Apulia or Lucania, but +it was situated at the foot of mount Vultur, which is +probably the Oscan word for mountain in general. It was +likewise a Romano-Latin colony, founded after the third +Samnite war by the Romans, who were then on friendly +terms with the Lucanians and ruled over Apulia. By this +colony they prepared their future undertaking against +Tarentum, as by it they completely cut off the communication +between the Samnites and that city. In +a fragment of Dionysius of Halicarnassus, in the Excerpta +of Constantine Porphyrogenitus, the Romans are said to +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_175">[175]</span>have sent 20,000 colonists to Venusia, that is 20,000 +families, or at least 20,000 men capable of bearing arms: +this number is incredible, there must be a mistake here. +By admitting the neighbouring Oscan and Lucanian people, +Venusia must, in the course of time, have become much +estranged from Home, for, during the Social War, it was +the only colony which, according to a statement in Appian, +rose against Rome. From the expressions of Horace it +may be inferred, that afterwards it became one of the +military colonies of Caesar.⁠<a id="FNanchor_54" href="#Footnote_54" class="fnanchor">[54]</a> The town will ever be +memorable as the birth-place of Horace.</p> + +<p>Having thus gone through Apulia in the Roman sense, +we shall proceed in a south-eastern direction to the people +of the <span class="smcap">Poediculi</span> or <span class="smcap">Peucetii</span>. The name is a double +derivative, as we often see in ethnic names, e.g., in Aequiculi; +the simple form was no doubt Poedi, though it does not +occur anywhere. The people themselves are not mentioned +in Roman history; we find them in a state of subjection, but +do not see when they fell into that condition; their name is +not mentioned in the Triumphal Fasti; and the struggle +with them cannot have been great. The name Poediculi +appears to be very different from Peucetii, and yet the +difference consists only in a transposition of the letters. It +is attested and generally acknowledged, that the two names +belong to the same people; they are called by the Greeks +Pelasgians, and belonged to the same race as the Oenotrians, +together with whom they are placed on a level with +the Thesprotians, Epirots, and Arcadians. This is, in fact, +quite natural, for as the Daunians were of this race, the +Peucetians, living still nearer to Greece, certainly belonged +to it.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Barium</span>, the most important place among the Peucetii, +occupies no prominent position in ancient history; but in +the middle ages, it was the seat of the Byzantine governors +(Capitani) of southern Italy: its present name is Bari. +The physical nature of the country of the Peucetii is very +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_176">[176]</span>remarkable; it is still the same chalk soil as in Apulia, but +it has here the peculiarity of constantly forming saltpetre: +there is no place in Europe that bears any resemblance to +it. There are large holes in the ground in the shape of +funnels, in which the saltpetre is collected: this phenomenon +is extremely remarkable, showing the formative +tendency of mineral nature. The country, though without +water and dry, is not really barren, but still the want of +water has its great disadvantages. The Terra d’Otranto +(Terra di Lecce), or the Iapygian headland, however, +which projects farther into the sea, is a much more fertile +and favoured country; it has indeed the same physical +conformation, but the upper stratum does not exclude the +water; it is richer in springs, and accordingly more fertile. +For the cultivation of olives, it is the most excellent country +in the world, but it is not suited for first class wines. +The olive-tree grows very well with less moisture, and +even at this day it is very excellent there, although the +art of cultivating it has sunk very low. It was in vain that +I requested the papal government to add to the plants in +the botanic garden which are cultivated for ordinary use, +those also which are of interest to the scholar. At Naples +something has been done for the cultivation of olives, and +many things which have been handed down from antiquity +may still be recognised. The Iapygian headland is a +beautiful hilly country, covered all over with olive plantations. +The olive is not a handsome tree, nearly resembling +a willow; its varieties, however, like those of the +vine, are very numerous; it spreads very rapidly, and is +almost imperishable, as if Minerva had given it immortality. +It is said that near Tivoli it lives a thousand years, though +no one can prove it; but certain it is, that it can live +several hundred years: it then becomes quite hollow, like +a willow, and continues its life through its bark. At this +stage its fruit is most perfect, but the root of the tree requires +the greatest care, and to prevent the tree being thrown +down by the winds, the root must be covered with a great +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_177">[177]</span>quantity of soil. All agriculture in Italy is still the same +as in antiquity, and as we find it described in the “Scriptores +Rei Rusticae;” you may still see every point as +described by Varro.</p> + +<h3 id="Messapia"><span class="smcap">Messapia</span></h3> + +<p class="noindent">had a somewhat greater extent than the present Terra di +Lecce. The ancient Greek name is ἀκτὴ Ἰαπυγία. It is +a beautiful hilly country, but its geography is in a singular +predicament. The name Messapii is only once mentioned +by the Romans, and that in the Triumphal Fasti; but we +know from Strabo, that Messapia was inhabited by two +different nations, the Messapians and Calabrians; and from +other authorities we learn that the inhabitants of Brundusium +were Calabrians. In the course of time, the name +Calabria became established among the Romans for the +whole of Messapia. It is remarkable, however, to find, +that in the middle ages the name was transferred to Lucania +and Bruttium, whereas Calabria Proper ceased to +have this name. The explanations given of this singular +change are unsatisfactory.</p> + +<p>The inhabitants of the western side of this Acte were the +<span class="smcap">Sallentines</span>, while the eastern coast, from the Iapygian +promontory to Brundusium, was occupied by <span class="smcap">Calabrians</span>. +The strangest traditions are current about the origin of the +Sallentines: they are sometimes called Bottiaeans and sometimes +Cretans; in short, they share the character of the +Tyrrheno-Pelasgian nations. But were the Calabrians of +the same race? I believe not, and am rather inclined to +think that they were immigrating and conquering Oscans; +for the fact, that Ennius of Rudiae in Calabria calls Oscan +and Greek his mother tongues, shows that, during the +Roman period, Oscan was spoken there. All the towns in +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_178">[178]</span>those parts were δίγλωσσοι, that is, they spoke Tyrrhenian +and Oscan. In like manner, the Albanese spoke both Greek +and Albanese, as had formerly been the case with the Albanese +at Argos and in Hydra. So also every man in the towns of +upper Silesia, who makes any pretence to education, and +even in rural districts, speaks German, although the national +language is Polish. At Ragusa, all respectable persons, +both nobles and commoners, speak Italian and Slavonian. +A priest of Ragusa, who was a dear friend of mine, told +me, that the little children at school do not commence by +learning Slavonian, but Latin and Italian, and that all +books are written in Italian, which language is explained +to the children while they learn. The educated classes in +Corfu speak Italian quite perfectly, and as correctly as it +is spoken in Tuscany.</p> + +<p>As we know that Brundusium arose after the expulsion +of the Pelasgian inhabitants, it seems beyond a doubt that the +Calabrians formed the last train of the Oscan immigrants +who came from the north through Apulia. The oracles +which are said to refer to this country, have no authority +whatever; they all belong to the period of Timaeus, or are +but little older than his age.</p> + +<p>There must have once been a town of the name of +Σαλλοῦς or Sallentum, from which the name of the +Sallentines is derived. The existence of such a town has, +in fact, been assumed by many moderns, and those who +have read “Telemachus” will remember that it is mentioned +in that book. This is in reality correct, but the +existence of the town cannot be historically proved: it +must have perished at a very early period. In ancient times +the Messapians were mortal enemies of the Tarentines, who +had endeavoured to make them ἀνάστατοι; but the Messapians +maintained their independence. When, centuries +later, circumstances were changed, and the neighbours had +come in closer contact, Messapia placed itself under the +protection of Tarentum.</p> + +<p>The towns in the country of the Messapians are unimportant; +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_179">[179]</span>there still exist very beautiful ruins, especially +a fine temple on the Iapygian headland; and in the +neighbourhood of Manduria a complete wall still exists. +The two most important towns were Hydruntum and +Brundusium.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Hydruntum</span> (Ὑδροῦς), now Otranto, had probably +Tarentine epoeci, by whom it was hellenised. It was a +place of great consequence, being the point from which +people sailed across to Apollonia and Oricus, as now people +sail from Calais to Dover. Hydruntum retained this character +until the Norman period, and as long as southern +Italy was connected with the eastern empire.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Brundusium</span> was distinguished for its excellent harbour, +which was valued the more because there was not a single +good harbour between Brundusium and Ancona. It consisted +of several branches, and could admit more ships than +ever sailed in those seas. For this reason the Romans +secured the possession of that town as early as possible, and +established a Latin colony there. At present the harbour +is partly filled up with mud.</p> + +<h3 id="Ancient_Oenotria"><span class="smcap">Ancient Oenotria.</span></h3> + +<p>The Oenotrians in southern Italy are the real Itali. I +shall speak of them first, and after having put them in their +right light, I shall pass on to the Greek towns on the +the coasts, which are commonly called Magna Graecia.</p> + +<p>Oenotria is the same as Italia in the limited sense of the +name. You remember the varying circumstances, according +to which the name Italia was given to a larger or smaller +extent of country, and that in its widest sense it embraced +the country as far as the Tiber and mount Garganus. In +consequence of the extension of other nations, the Itali +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_180">[180]</span>were afterwards confined to the southern country, and +thereby became so compact, that they were wholly governed +by the Greek colonies on the coast, and hence when, e.g., +a person went from Sybaris to Posidonia, or from Croton +to Terina, he had to pass, if not through a country altogether +peopled by Greeks, at least through one governed by Greek +towns. Oenotria thus became Italy proper; but it cannot +be said, on the other hand, that the name Italia was transferred +from that small district to the whole of the peninsula. +If we were confined to the Roman writers alone, and if we +had no information from Greek authors, especially Dionysius +and Strabo, we should be in utter ignorance about the +Oenotrians, and we should scarcely have any idea of Italian +archaeology. From this we may infer how much more +information must be lost about more distant countries, which +had no literature of their own. The Lucanians, whom we +afterwards find spread over the whole of that country, +occupied, at the period of the Persian wars, only the north-eastern +portion of Lucania, while all the rest of the country +afterwards called Lucania, and the whole of Bruttium, were +inhabited by Oenotrians. On the coast, Greek colonies +were established, which ruled over them as sovereigns, so +that the greater part of the Oenotrians were reduced to a +state of servitude, but another portion of them was never +subdued. These Oenotrians were Pelasgians or Siceli of +the same stock as the Epirots, as is stated by the scholiast +on the Odyssey, on the authority of the Macedonian +Mnaseas, the disciple of Aristarchus. <i>Siceli</i> and <i>Itali</i> are +the same, as was recognised even by the ancients; the +names are also etymologically identical, <i>Italus</i> being the +same as <i>Vitulus</i>, the sibilant taking the place of the +digamma. In a narrower sense, the name Siculi was +applied to the Oenotrians, the inhabitants of the southernmost +part of Italy. It is very strange to find that this very +ancient mode of designation re-appears in the geography of +the middle ages, for in the division of the Byzantine empire +into provinces, the southernmost part of Italy was called +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_181">[181]</span>Sikelia. This is generally referred to the vanity of the +Byzantine court, which is said to have been desirous to +have a province called Sicily, after the island had been +taken from it by the Arabs. This indeed is not impossible; +but I believe it to be a very arbitrary conjecture, and am +rather inclined to believe that the country, in ordinary life, +still continued to be called Sikelia, as the earliest Italians +were called Siceli by Thucydides and Timaeus (in Polybius). +In this manner, the name was probably propagated, and +this also seems to have been the origin of the strange +appellation of “the two Sicilies,” which at present is +indeed quite absurd, but, in its origin, was probably quite +intelligible.</p> + +<p>Besides these Siceli, which, in some districts that can +no longer be defined, were called <i>Italietes</i> and <i>Morgetes</i>, +there existed in southern Italy yet another race of the +Oenotrians, called <span class="smcap">Chaonians</span> or <span class="smcap">Chonians</span>. This name +also re-appears in Epirus. The metropolis of the Chaonians +was called Chone, and had been situated not far from Croton; +it may have been destroyed by the Greeks.</p> + +<p>In their state of dependence on the ancient Greek towns, +these Oenotrians became completely hellenised. During +the first century after the Greek settlements, they were not +yet subdued, but they were reduced at the time when +Sybaris and Croton had reached their highest prosperity. +This is proved by the colonies of these two cities on the +western coast, which oblige us to assume that the intermediate +country was subject to them. Hence the almost +fabulous accounts of the immense population of Sybaris +and Croton, which must be understood to refer, not to the +population of the cities alone, but also to comprise their +subjects. The fall of Sybaris, in Olymp. 67, 3, was the +death blow to the Greek dominion in southern Italy, and +to the subjects who all lived in willing submission; for in +the course of a long time a relation had arisen, in which +the rule of Sybaris had become milder and milder, and in +which the nations became more and more united with it. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_182">[182]</span>It was probably after the foundation of Thurii in the territory +of Sybaris, that the Lucanians appeared in the +northern part of the country, the modern Basilicata. They +first attacked Posidonia and captured it; they next +conquered the western part of the whole country, which +derived from them the name of Lucania, and then advanced +more and more against the Greek towns, as on the eastern +coast against Thurii and Croton, which now dropped their +former jealousy in order to defend themselves against +the common enemy. But they were so far reduced as to +be confined within their own walls. This extension of the +Lucanians becomes manifest about the beginning of the +Peloponnesian war. Strabo is not correct in saying, that +the Lucanians expelled the Oenotrians and Chonians, for +they only subdued them. The decisive battle of Laos +between the population of Magna Graecia and the Lucanians, +in which the latter gained the upper hand, belongs +to the period of the conquest of Rome by the Gauls; and +this battle prostrated the Greeks for ever. Lucania now +became a great state, extending from the frontier of the +Hirpinians to the gates of Rhegium. But it did not long +maintain itself in this extent. The Sabellian Lucanians +were not numerous enough to rule over so large a territory. +The consequence of their victory over the Greek towns +was, that the latter were broken, and that the ancient +serfs of the Greeks in those parts, a portion of the Lucanians +themselves, and the subjects of the Lucanians, +constituted themselves as an independent state under the +name of the Bruttii. Henceforth Lucania was reduced to +about one half of its former territory; but it retained this +extent until the last period of the Roman empire, and +under its name a separate region of Italy was formed.</p> + +<p>Lucania was fearfully devasted during the several wars +which were carried on there. The resistance of the Lucanians +against the Romans was not so desperate as that of +the Samnites, whence they did not suffer so much when +at length they were obliged to succumb. But they committed +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_183">[183]</span>the folly of throwing themselves into the arms of +Hannibal; the consequence of which was that the Romans +destroyed their towns one after another; some of them, +however, which remained faithful to Rome, especially the +capital, Petelia, were severely treated by Hannibal. After +the war a great part of their territory became Roman +domain land. Still, however, they recovered to some extent; +they then took part in the Social War, but do not appear +to have suffered much. The result was that they obtained +the Roman franchise. But they again suffered severely +during the servile war of Spartacus, whose real head-quarters +were in Lucania and Bruttium; at that time the country +was changed into a wilderness. From Cicero’s speech for +Tullius, we see that at Thurii every thing was burnt down. +Lucania is a woody mountainous country, and the Apennines +in those parts are full of the most beautiful forests; +during the latter period of the republic large estates were +formed there; the free population was for the most part +extirpated, and the large farms were managed by slaves, +coloni being seldom employed, and wherever slaves put +their feet, not a blade of grass remained. Hence, during +the first centuries of the empire, the country was almost +deserted, and was employed only as pasture land; the +population had become completely uncivilised. From the +edicts of the emperors during the fourth and fifth centuries, +we see what terrible people those slaves were: the severest +laws were enacted merely to establish some security; they +were disarmed, and for ever forbidden the use of any +weapons whatsoever.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Bruttium</span> was in the same condition; it had been laid +waste as early as the Hannibalian war. After the war of +Pyrrhus, the Bruttians had obtained tolerable terms from +the Romans, and their subsequent revolt was not provoked +by any act on the part of the Romans. They suffered +especially from the circumstance that Hannibal, during the +latter years of his war established himself among them, +recruited his armies there, and carried many of their young +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_184">[184]</span>men capable of bearing arms with him to Africa. He +was obliged, against his own inclination, to make heavy +demands upon the country. The Romans, on the other +hand, afterwards took fearful vengeance on them; although +the events had been brought about less by the desire of the +Bruttians than by unavoidable circumstances. The Romans +deprived them of their political existence, and treated them +as a people among whom only <i>servi publici</i> for all manner of +services were levied. By this means, the Bruttians were +reduced to a state of helotism. This is one of the reasons +why they are not mentioned at all during the Social War; +another circumstance contributing to the same result was +that the Romans did not regard them as Italicans, but as +Greeks.</p> + +<p>I have not much to say respecting the towns in the +interior of the country. <span class="smcap">Petelia</span>, an ancient Pelasgian +town, the origin of which was connected with Greek traditions, +was the capital of Lucania. <span class="smcap">Crumentum</span> was the +most important town in the interior; the form of its name +is like those of others with which we have become acquainted: +the Pelasgian Κρυμόεις or Κρυμοῦς changes its +termination into <i>entum</i>, and signifies “the cold,” or +“frosty,” from its situation on a high hill.</p> + +<p>In time of war, the Lucanians had a common magistrate, +called βασιλεὺς by the Greeks, and <i>imperator</i> by the Romans, +and a common constitution; but we know nothing about the +political forms of the Bruttians. The inscriptions on +Lucanian coins are Oscan, written in Greek characters; but +the people, also, spoke Greek perfectly, so that the fact of +the Pseudo-Pythagorean books being called Lucanian is not +against probability. The Lucanian coins are far less beautiful +than those of Bruttium, which have Greek inscriptions, and +are like the most beautiful coins of Greek cities. Though, +therefore, they destroyed Greek towns, still they learned +and cultivated the arts of the Greeks. <span class="smcap">Consentia</span> was the +capital of the Bruttians, and the modern Cosenza is likewise +a capital.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_185">[185]</span></p> + +<p>The great <span class="smcap">Sila</span> forest, in the north of Bruttium, was of +great importance to the Bruttians; it was very extensive, +and such a large forest shows the desolation of the country +from war. It furnished the Romans with excellent timber +for ship-building, and also yielded a considerable revenue +from the manufacture of tar.</p> + +<h3 id="Greek_Towns_on_the_Coast_of_Italy"><span class="smcap">Greek Towns on the Coast of Italy.</span></h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">Callipolis</span> (now Gallipoli), a colony of Tarentum, +situated on the Iapygian promontory on the south-east +of Tarentum, has no historical interest. But <span class="smcap">Tarentum</span> +itself is all the more important. This city is generally +spoken of by the ancients, and especially by Livy, with +great moral contempt. I am quite sure that no man is less +disposed to put forth paradoxes than I: on the contrary, +every paradox is repulsive to me, and calls forth in +me a feeling of distrust. There are, however, many points +in history on which we cannot help asserting the very +opposite of the opinion generally current. People speak of +the Tarentines as if they had been completely lost in +luxuries and effeminacy, and as if they had really deserved +the frightful fate they had to endure; they are spoken of +with contempt, because, it is said, they embarked in great +undertakings, but did not possess the strength to carry them +out by themselves, and lived in a constant round of sensual +pleasures. But it is especially the ὕβρις and βδελυρία +which the Tarentines displayed towards the Roman ambassadors, +that has made an indelible stain on their character. +Now, although I am far from believing that the Tarentines +were deserving of any unusual degree of moral respect, yet +I must positively assert, that the things for which they are +so generally condemned, are for the most part false, and in +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_186">[186]</span>some points the allegations against them are no grounds for +condemnation. It is impossible to despise a people which, +while the other Greek towns succumbed to the Italians, +rose to such greatness during that very period, and without +being favoured by any outward circumstances. Such a thing +cannot be done without skill, ability, and character; it is +not a mere fortunate accident, especially in a republic, +where a brilliant period cannot be brought about by a single +great ruler, as in a monarchy. Moreover, Tarentum produced +an Archytas, who was, perhaps, the greatest philosopher, +mathematician, and statesman, in all antiquity, unless +we may except Thucydides who, if he had wished it, might +have become equally great in the sciences; but he took no +interest in them. Such a man usually cannot expect the +most favourable reception among his countrymen, the voice +of envy and jealousy immediately rising against him. But +Archytas was, notwithstanding all this, repeatedly placed +at the head of the state as its strategus, and with such +confidence, that the democratic Tarentines allowed themselves +to be guided and directed entirely by him. This circumstance +alone would convince me, that they do not deserve +the harsh sentence which posterity has pronounced upon +them: however much they may have degenerated fifty +years later, at that time their prosperity was not undeserved.</p> + +<p>Ancient Tarentum was a very extensive place; the +modern town with its 18,000 or 20,000 inhabitants, though, +it is true, they live very close together, does not occupy +more space than the ancient acra, the original Laconian +colony, around which the new town arose and extended. This +immense new town has disappeared, though its circumference +can still be recognised. It is well known, that the origin +of Tarentum is connected with the history of Laconia; +the story has indeed some historical foundation, but is +evidently perverted; and the statement about Phalanthus +and the Parthenii has no historical character at all. In +very many states, in which no connubium existed between +the different parts of the population, the persons sprung +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_187">[187]</span>from unlawful marriages between members of the ruling +and those of the subject people, endangered the government +of the ruling class. Such were the Parthenii. For +about two centuries and a half the Tarentines were powerful +far and wide, but an attempt they made about the time +of the Persian wars, to reduce the Messapians to the condition +of helots, failed, and they suffered a defeat from +which for a century they could not recover; the defeat, +according to Herodotus, was the most bloody that had ever +been sustained by a Greek nation. Still, however, Tarentum +afterwards recovered, and that too at a period when we +should least expect it, when Thurii, Croton, and other towns +sank, and when in many parts the towns entirely disappeared. +It may be, that Tarentum offered a place of refuge to the +Greeks expelled from Caulon and other places; but the people +must have made every effort to overcome their difficult +circumstances, for their city became very powerful. It now +assumed altogether a commercial and manufacturing character, +and became the real emporium for southern Italy, and +perhaps for Samnium also. Salt was a lucrative article of its +commerce; it had excellent wool, cloth manufactories, and +dyeing establishments; purple in particular was made there +in the greatest perfection. Tarentum was in every respect an +industrial place, with extensive navigation and fisheries. +Such a population could not possibly feel inclined to serve +in the army as a heavy-armed infantry, such as was then +required; their cavalry was anything but contemptible; it was +distinguished for peculiar tactics of its own. The fact that +they enlisted foreign mercenaries, ought not to be made a +subject of reproach to them, as they were a commercial people, +and as it was the general practice of the Greeks at that time. +That they took into their pay foreign princes with their +whole armies, may have been imprudent; but in this +respect too they did no more than what was done by +England, which, during the eighteenth century, often took +whole regiments of foreign countries into its service, a +system which the United States of the Netherlands followed +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_188">[188]</span>ever since the time of Maurice of Orange. It was the +natural consequence of circumstances; and it is absurd to +expect of such a wealthy commercial people, that it should +be as great in war as an agricultural people. They, no +doubt, did not conceal from themselves the fact that their +military system was bad; but politics cannot always control +all circumstances. The Tarentines certainly do not deserve +the reproach of ingratitude towards Alexander of Epirus, +for his intention was to set himself up as king of southern +Italy, and he first acted as an enemy towards them. The fate +of Tarentum in its contest with Rome is known from history: +after the fall of Samnium, it threw itself into the +arms of Pyrrhus, after whose death it was betrayed and +sold. According to the Roman historians, Rome treated the +city very generously, leaving it independent: this independence, +however, may have been a mere name; the Romans for +a longtime kept a garrison there, which, in the Hannibalian +war defended the old town against the siege of Hannibal. +The new town threw itself into the arms of the Carthaginian, +but he could not maintain it, and the inhabitants +were obliged to surrender to the Romans, who now took +cruel vengeance and destroyed the place. In the time of +C. Gracchus it became a Roman colony.</p> + +<p>The Greek towns of Southern Italy are comprised under +the general name of <span class="smcap">Magna Graecia</span>; whether this name +also included Tarentum, or whether it was limited to the +coast of Oenotrian Italy, and whether it also embraced the +interior, these are questions which, so far as I know, the +ancients do not decide, though the name was in use at a +very early period. If we possessed the work of Antiochus +of Syracuse, a contemporary of Herodotus, it would perhaps +furnish us information about it; from Ephorus and +Eratosthenes we could hardly expect to learn anything on +this point. It is possible also that the name ἡ μεγάλη +Ἑλλάς may not have been confined to the Greek towns.</p> + +<p>In enumerating these towns, we may follow a twofold +system: we may either trace them along the coast, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_189">[189]</span>beginning with the one next to Tarentum and thus proceeding +as far as Posidonia, or we may arrange them +according to the Greek tribes to which they belonged, and +according to the alleged periods of their foundation. The +first system may be traced on any map where they follow +one another in this order: Metapontum, Heraclea, Siris +(which is found in very few maps), Sybaris (afterwards +Thurii), Croton, Scylletion, Caulon, Locri, and Rhegium: +on the other side, we have Hipponium, Laos, Pyxus, Elea, +and Posidonia. These towns were colonies of different +tribes, but the most important among them were of Achaean +origin. The original number of the latter was four, +which again became the mother towns of the rest; even in +regard to the fourth, however, it is not certain whether +it was not a colony of Croton. Sybaris was the most +ancient among them: next came Croton; Metapontum, the +third, was of much more recent origin; and the fourth, was +Caulon or Caulonia, concerning which, as I have already +said, it is doubtful whether it was an Achaean colony, or +whether it received at the same time settlers from Croton, +as was the case at Apollonia which was founded by Corinth +and Corcyra conjointly.</p> + +<p>The colonies of the Locrians are equally ancient, and, +according to tradition, they even belong to an earlier date. +Both these sets of colonies again founded others: the +Achaean Laos founded Scidros, Elea (a mixed colony), +and Posidonia; and the Locrians built Hipponium and +Medina. There were also Ionian colonies of different +kinds; Siris was a very ancient Colophonian settlement; +Rhegium, a Chalcidian colony of a more recent date, +afterwards founded Pyxus. Elea, too, may be called +Ionian, inasmuch as the fugitives from Phocaea were +admitted there, as those from Colophon had been at +Siris. They accordingly lie, as it were, in chronological +strata above one another, not proceeding in their origin +from the same points.</p> + +<p>In regard to some of these colonies, the same question +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_190">[190]</span>presents itself which we had to answer in the case of those +in Asia Minor, namely, whether they were really ancient +Greek colonies in the sense in which they are so called by +our historians, or whether they are not partially of earlier +origin, so that, being originally founded by people akin to +the Greeks, they afterwards assumed an entirely Greek +character. This is really probable in the case of some of +them, but nothing certain can be said about it. This +opinion is most plausible in regard to the Locrians, for the +accounts of their origin are too mythical, and they act +a part in all the ancient traditions relating to the period +of the Siculi and Itali. The only definite tradition about +their origin is the one mentioned by Aristotle, of which +I shall speak in due time. The fact, that the Achaeans +appear as a colonising people, is likewise mysterious, as +they are so insignificant in the early history of Greece. +However, Zacynthos, too, is an Achaean colony, and one of +the results of the historical inquiries of modern times is, +that very little is known about Greek history previous to +the Persian wars. Many changes, therefore, may have +taken place, of which we are completely ignorant: as the +Achaeans passed through a revolution in Aegialos, it is at +all events possible, that previously they were a more important +people, and that after the Doric migration the +oppressed perioeci may have assembled and emigrated from +Peloponnesus, just as the Minyans are said to have emigrated +from Taenaron to other parts. But these things scarcely +admit of sober criticism, and I will not dwell upon them. I +shall now enumerate the towns according to the common +practice beginning with the most important. The Achaean +colonies will be mentioned first.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Sybaris</span>, according to tradition, was the most ancient +among the Achaean towns. It has a great name, but in +the period of historical certainty it had ceased to exist. +The greatness of Sybaris is beyond a doubt, but all the +details related about the luxuriousness of its inhabitants, +their wealth, their works of art, and their final catastrophe, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_191">[191]</span>are either doubtful or altogether fabulous. The numbers +of its inhabitants and of the men capable of bearing arms +are exaggerated in an almost oriental fashion, for at its +destruction, the city is said to have had 300,000 men capable +of bearing arms; the manner also, in which Croton is +said to have gained the battle, is a mere silly story. But +we need not wonder at the fabulous character of these accounts, +or at the obscurity of the history, for all the early +history of Greece is in the same predicament, and Roman +history too begins very late. We must be on our guard not +to measure the history of the western nations by the standard +of eastern annals. Even if we trace the contemporary records +among the Hebrews only as far as the time of Solomon, we +already reach a very early period compared with that to +which history ascends in Greece. There can be no doubt, +that the Egyptians had annals from the period of the +seventeenth dynasty, that is, from the time of Sesostris and +Amenophis, or the expulsion of the Hycsos; but the Greeks +had no such ancient contemporary records, and although +there existed certain annalistic tables, as for example, the list +of the priestesses at Argos, still they did not, like the oriental +annals, constitute a history, but were mere lists of years. +It is of extreme importance to an historical philologer, to +know how late Greek history commences. At the period +of my youth, I and those of the same age with me grew +up under the most erroneous notions in this respect. I was +already a young man, when it first occurred to me to +doubt the truth of the stories about the Messenian wars and +about Aristomenes; in the common histories of Greece no +doubts were expressed, the events were assigned to definite +years, and were narrated as confidently as if they were +reported on the best historical authority. People are not +yet sufficiently free from these thoroughly erroneous notions, +although a right view has already gained some ground. +All we know about Sybaris with certainty is, that it was +destroyed several years before the period which we regard +as the time of the expulsion of the Roman kings; Greek +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_192">[192]</span>writers place the destruction three years before this event; +but synchronistic statements of this kind are of no value. +Posidonia and Laos on the opposite coast were colonies of +Sybaris, whence we may suppose that all Lucania, with +the exception of Metapontum, was subject to it. Sybaris +and all those towns became great and powerful within an +incredibly short period, which probably arose from the +fact of their being commercial colonies. The rapidity, +with which commercial cities rise, is exemplified by New +York, which 120 years ago had no more than 1000 inhabitants, +while at present its population amounts to +upwards of 140,000. The same increase has taken place at +Philadelphia. If, as is generally supposed, Sybaris at the +time of its destruction had existed for two centuries, we +may easily admit that it had become great and powerful, +and hence there is nothing impossible in the statement, +that it ruled over four nations and twenty-five towns. We +must also bear in mind, that those Greek towns might grow +up even with much greater rapidity than the English +colonies in North America; for in the latter all the settlers +were Europeans, and consequently quite foreign to the +original population; in southern Italy, on the other hand, +the greater part of the population consisted unquestionably +of native Oenotrians, who were by no means foreign to the +Greeks. In countries where the natives were foreign to +them, as on the Euxine, their colonies never rose so rapidly +as on the coasts of Asia Minor and Italy, where they settled +among kindred tribes. Cyrene, which was a large city, +perhaps forms the only exception in this respect.</p> + +<p>In regard to the history of Sybaris, it is certain that +Sybaris and Tarentum, being Achaean and Dorian towns +respectively, were hostile to each other, and that there was a +time when Sybaris and Croton, both of Achaean origin, were +on friendly terms. The object of the dispute with Tarentum +was the fertile district between the Acalandrus and the +Siris, which was called Siritis; and in order to maintain +their possession of it, the Sybarites are said to have invited +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_193">[193]</span>other Achaeans to come over, and these latter are reported +to have founded—</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Metapontum.</span>⁠<a id="FNanchor_55" href="#Footnote_55" class="fnanchor">[55]</a> Its name shows the same formation +which we have already observed on several other occasions, +and leads us to a form Μεταποῦς, analogous to Μαλοῦς. +This town, which was founded under the protection of +Sybaris, may in reality not have been in a state of independence +as long as Sybaris was a powerful state; in order +to preserve the possession of its territory, Metapontum +required the protection of the Sybarites against the neighbouring +Oenotrians and Apulians; but after the fall of Sybaris, +Metapontum may be regarded as an independent town. In +the traditions we have of this place, as in those of several +others, statements about its earlier Oenotrian condition are +mixed up with those about its later Hellenic character; the +Pelasgian traditions about it always refer to the Trojan +legend, and hence Metapontum is mentioned as a Pylian +colony. During the period down to the time when the +Lucanians became powerful, the place, from the extraordinary +fertility of its territory, became so wealthy as to +equal the richest Greek towns in Italy. The Metapontines +are said to have sent a θέρος χρυσοῦν to Delphi, which was +probably a golden sheaf, the produce of the tithes. Their +great wealth is also attested by the very numerous gold and +silver coins of Metapontum, of very beautiful workmanship, +and mostly of great antiquity. Afterwards, however, all the +towns in those parts were overpowered by the Lucanians, and +Metapontum, also, which was deprived of its territory, must +have lost its greatness in consequence. Afterwards, it suffered +severely from the Greek and Epirot armies, which were called +into the country by the Tarentines. Alexander of Epirus and +Cleonymus of Sparta for a time occupied Metapontum with +garrisons, and Cleonymus in particular acted with disgraceful +cruelty: he took hostages, and plundered and pillaged +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_194">[194]</span>the town. After that time it never recovered. In the war +of Pyrrhus, Metapontum was an insignificant place; in the +second Punic war, it attached itself to Hannibal, and +afterwards it is, as if a wave had passed over it and washed +it away, though we do not know how or when; but we hear no +more of it. In the age of Strabo, it was a small place, but +in point of fact, it had perished.</p> + +<p>The destruction of Sybaris by the Crotoniats was the +death-blow to the Greek towns in those parts, for the Crotoniats +were not able to protect the country against the +invading Lucanians and Oenotrians. Some of the surviving +Sybarites withdrew to their colonies of Laos and Scidros, +and others built a small place of the name of Sybaris in a +distant part; all attempts to rebuild the ancient city failed, +for Croton and the vengeance of the emancipated serfs +prevented it. In this distress they applied to the Athenians, +who in the days of their greatness appear everywhere as +the defenders of the Hellenic name: on this occasion, too, +they were ready to assist the unfortunate Sybarites, and +invited colonists from all parts of Greece to settle at Sybaris. +The reason why Croton did not oppose this new settlement +may have been the fact, that the people of the interior were +advancing more and more; the Crotoniats probably felt, that a +powerful Greek colony in the neighbourhood might be very +useful to them: Posidonia, too, was probably already lost. +At a deliberation of the Spartans and their allies, a Greek said, +that if Athens were destroyed, “the spring would be taken +out of Hellas,”⁠<a id="FNanchor_56" href="#Footnote_56" class="fnanchor">[56]</a>⁠—the destruction of Sybaris had taken the +spring out of Magna Graecia. The settlement at <span class="smcap">Thurii</span> +succeeded without any opposition on the part of the Italicans. +It was called an Athenian colony; but the Athenians +formed only a small portion of the population, which consisted +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_195">[195]</span>of Dorians and Ionians, islanders as well as emigrants +from the mainland, who had been invited by the Athenians, +without any distinction, as to a general Greek enterprise; +the Athenians did not reserve for themselves any petty +advantages, being satisfied with the consciousness that +history would call them the restorers of Sybaris. Thurii +must have been a strong colony, whence it soon rose to importance. +The ancient name was probably ominous, as +Sybaris had been destroyed twice, or perhaps even three +times. The name Thurii is said to have been derived from +a well. This is possible; but the emblem of Sybaris on +ancient coins (for there are some very ancient ones) is +always a bull, whence it is quite possible, that this emblem +may have been the cause of the name, for θούριος signifies +<i>ferox</i>, fierce, wild. Thurii soon became involved in constant +wars with the Lucanians; but fifty or sixty years +after its foundation it was already so powerful that it +could lose more than 10,000 men in battle against the +Lucanians. This loss, however, was a blow from which it +never could thoroughly recover; it was soon after confined +to its own territory, and perhaps even obliged to pay +tribute to protect itself against the devastations of the +Lucanians. In the wars of the Tarentines and the other +Greeks against the Lucanians, Thurii is indeed still mentioned, +but it sank more and more, until in the end it was +taken and plundered by the Lucanians. Afterwards, it +placed itself under the protection of the Romans, who, +however, were unable to prevent its being plundered a +second time by the Tarentines. Subsequently it sank so +low, that after the Hannibalian war a Latin colony was +established there; but this colony was equally unfortunate, +for during the war of Spartacus it was razed to the ground, +as we see from the fragments of Cicero’s speech for Tullius, +recently discovered by A. Mai.</p> + +<p>The next place is <span class="smcap">Croton</span>, which, according to tradition, +was founded shortly after Sybaris. There exist very contradictory +accounts about this town, and it is difficult to +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_196">[196]</span>discover any connection among them. Heyne has written +several essays on all the towns of Magna Graecia; he ought +not to be undervalued, but nearly all his works were written +in too great a hurry; he had overburdened himself with +official business and his own undertakings, and it is melancholy +to see how a man of such truly beautiful talents does +not rise above mediocrity in his writings. On the whole, +he has only produced imperfect works; if he had concentrated +himself more, if he had been willing to do less, and +if he had not been possessed by an unfortunate πολυπραγμοσύνη, +he would certainly have acquired a great and +lasting reputation. The best intentions in such a case are +of no avail; posterity will not heed them; for it does not +ask, What is the number of a man’s works? but, What are +they? His fate may be described in the words of Scripture: +“He is gone hence, and not a trace of him is left behind.” +Heyne also founded a school which was bad, though +his followers were celebrated in Germany, as if they were +great scholars. From it, however, men proceeded, who, +though outwardly belonging to it, kept themselves independent +of the school, as F. A. Wolf and others, who are the +real restorers of the sound philology which is now flourishing. +Heyne’s essays are pleasant to read; but he who is +familiar with their subjects, sees before him a man who does +not take the trouble to examine things, who is satisfied with +vague conceptions, and shows the greatest indifference as to +what is possible and what is not; it is only now and then +that a bright idea reminds us of his original talent. But, +notwithstanding all this, Heyne’s essays ought not to be left +unread. Very different is the case of Bentley, and I must +strongly recommend to you every thing he has written on +similar subjects.</p> + +<p>There is great difficulty in the tradition about Croton, +according to which it was so powerful that it became insolent, +and attempted to subdue the Locrians; the Locrians, +however, it is said, owing to the favour of the gods, who +took pity on the oppressed, gained quite an unexpected and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_197">[197]</span>glorious victory over them. Hereupon, tradition says, the +Crotoniats renounced war and lived in effeminacy, until Pythagoras +appeared among them, and by a new religion which +he taught, and by new ordinances, introduced a fresh spirit +and improved manners among them. Yet here again the +mystery is, how, during that very period of moral debasement, +the Crotoniats could stand in the same relation to +Sybaris, as that in which Locri stood to Croton. One might +be inclined to place the battle on the Sagra, according to +Justin and other indications, between Olympiad 70 and 80; +and I myself formerly entertained this opinion; but after +the discovery of the “Excerpta de Sententiis” from Diodorus +and Polybius, it cannot be doubted that the ancients +placed it in Olymp. 50. From this, then, it follows, that the +stories of their insolence, effeminacy, and moral debasement, +must be regarded as mere arbitrary inventions. Although +no such exaggerated numbers are mentioned in the case of +Croton as in that of Sybaris, yet 100,000 armed men are +said to have been arrayed against the Locrians on the Sagra, +and the circumference of the city is said to have been +twelve Roman miles; Livy, who no doubt took the account +from Polybius, states it to have been 100 stadia, and this +does not appear fabulous. The greatness of Croton belongs +to an early period, but afterwards its power must have sunk +in consequence of circumstances which are unknown to +us. Traces of internal commotions occur in the well-known +account of the persecution of the Pythagoreans. This sect +went hand in hand with the aristocracy; its downfall was +connected with the development of democracy, and was +not so much the consequence of its religious as of its +political character. This accounts for the fact, that Croton +had already ceased to be a powerful state, when, according +to Diodorus, Magna Graecia becomes prominent in history, +that is, about the time of the foundation of Thurii. When +the Lucanians were spreading far and wide, and Thurii +received its fatal blow at Laos, the Crotoniats are +not mentioned with any degree of distinction, but are +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_198">[198]</span>treated like the inhabitants of the other cantons of that +country. But if it had been a town of small extent, +Dionysius the elder would not have been so anxious to gain +possession of it; he besieged and conquered it in a nocturnal +surprise, by attacking it on a side where it was +believed to be almost inaccessible. This capture of Croton, +which Diodorus strangely says nothing about, must have +been very destructive in its effects upon the place. Dionysius, +it is true, afterwards quitted it, and it recovered its +independence, but thenceforth its fate was always very +deplorable. Croton was obliged to submit to Alexander of +Epirus, though he inflicted no injury upon it; but Agathocles, +in his undertaking against Corcyra, besieged it in passing; +the town was then governed by the tyrant Menecrates, +whom Agathocles deceived by pretending that he was +anxious to form connections with him; but he then suddenly +changed the course of his fleet which was bound for Corcyra, +and having landed at Croton, captured the town. Not +quite twenty-five years later, in <span class="allsmcap">A.U.</span> 450, the Romans +under P. Cornelius Rufinus took it by assault; and this +catastrophe, as we see from Livy’s account of the Hannibalian +war, completely broke its power. It now shrunk together +within its ancient circumference in the same manner as e.g., +Pisa, or Leyden, which once had 100,000 inhabitants, while +at present it has only 20,000. When a person walks on +the ramparts of Pisa, he sees the modern town concentrated +in the centre of its ancient circumference. Pisa is at present +as desolate as many an eastern city, such as, e.g., Basra or +Ispahan; such also was the condition of Rome in the middle +ages, especially during the time when the popes resided at +Avignon. The arx of Croton was situated in the centre +of the town, and around it a few houses were still standing: +all the rest had become changed into fields. In the Hannibalian +war, the Bruttians took the town and demanded of +the inhabitants to share it with them, but the Crotoniats +preferred emigrating to living together with them. The +Bruttians then established a colony there, but after the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_199">[199]</span>conclusion of the war they were expelled by the Romans, +who now sent a colony thither; but this was not very +successful either. At present Croton is a little country-town.</p> + +<p>It is remarkable that, considering the importance of the +cities of Magna Graecia, so few monuments of antiquity are +found in all of them: there are cameos and coins of Tarentum, +but few statues.</p> + +<p>In the neighbourhood of Croton there was a temple of +<i>Juno Lacinia</i> on the Lacinian promontory. This promontory +on the one side, and the Iapygian on the other, inclose +the gulf of Tarentum. Lacinia is generally taken as a +proper name of Juno, and from it the name of the promontory +is derived; but this is incorrect: the adjective is +an ethnic name, and <i>Juno Lacinia</i> and <i>Acra Lacinia</i> are +nothing else but Juno and the Acra of the Lacinii, that +is, the Latini, in the sense in which all the Pelasgian Italiots +are so called. According to the most authentic accounts, +this temple of Juno Lacinia is more ancient than the Greek +settlements on those coasts; in the remotest times it was +the common sanctuary of the Oenotrians, and afterwards it +passed into the hands of the Crotoniats. During the period of +Croton’s greatness it was extremely rich, and traces of its +wealth existed as late as the Hannibalian war; but in the +course of this war it was profaned and plundered by the +Romans. Hannibal had his head-quarters there for a long +time, and caused a large tablet, containing a history of his +own exploits in the Greek and Punic languages, to be set +up in the temple. How valuable would such a document +be, if it were preserved! I shall pass over the small places +south of the Lacinian promontory, and proceed to—</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Caulon</span> or <span class="smcap">Caulonia</span>, a small Achaean town, which +had a common diet with the other places.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Locri</span>, was probably not a real Greek colony, but a Hellenized +place. If Locri was a Greek colony, this fact, too, would +show, what is everywhere probable from their very situation, +that the Ozolian Locrians and those πέραν Εὐβοίας once +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_200">[200]</span>belonged to each other, and that they were torn asunder only +by the immigration of the Dolopians; and that accordingly +they were a much larger people. We must, therefore, be +on our guard not to blame Virgil, as he has been blamed +for calling the Locrians <i>Narycii</i>. People say, it is inconceivable +that the Locrians should have been called <i>Narycii</i>, +as mount Naryx was situated opposite Euboea, while the +Italian Locrians were descended from the Ozolian Locrians +(according to Strabo). Virgil did not conceive the Locrians +as divided, but as one unbroken race, extending from the +Corinthian to the Euboean sea. The Locrians in Italy are +called Ἐπιζεφύριοι, that is, ἐπὶ Ζεφυρίῳ, on the promontory +of Zephyrium. Hitherto the traditions about these Locrians +have been a curious puzzle. The ancient excerpts from +the twelfth book of Polybius contain traces of a great controversy +of Timaeus, who is raving against Aristotle on +account of what he had said about the origin of the Locrians. +But what Aristotle actually had said, is not mentioned +by the epitomizer, and it could only be guessed that +he had derived their origin from slaves. Besides this, +there was a passage of Dionysius Periegeta, in which he +says of the Locrians σφετέρῃς μιχθέντες ἀνάσσαις, on +which the passage of the scholiast is incomplete. But from +the new “Excerpta de Sententiis,” the whole matter has +become clear. Aristotle relates the following tradition. +In the first Messenian war, the Locrians furnished the Spartans +with auxiliaries, and all their men capable of bearing +arms had taken the field. During their absence, their +wives and daughters led a licentious life with their servants; +and from fear of their returning masters, the servants with +their concubines emigrated. Timaeus in saying that this +story sounds fabulous, made easy game of Aristotle, if he +supposed that Aristotle believed it to be true; but I would +undertake to answer for it that Aristotle did not give the +story as a real historical tradition, but that he mentioned it +only as a legend of the Locrians. He no doubt asserted +that the Italian Locrians were not a colony of the Greek +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_201">[201]</span>Locrians, and that, if they were Locrians, they were so only +through the women. Timaeus might easily have investigated +the matter; but his object was only to find fault with +Aristotle. But such disgraceful conduct always receives +its punishment in due time, and Polybius has prepared it for +him. If here, as everywhere else, we put aside the mythical +story, we find that the foundation of the Locrian state in +Italy belongs to the period of the decay of the constitution +of the <i>gentes</i>, when in various places illegitimate marriages +between the ancient families and the δῆμος gave rise to a +mixed race, which became dangerous to the aristocracy, and +was, therefore, obliged to emigrate. The same fact forms +the basis of the story about Phalanthus and the Parthenii.</p> + +<p>But whatever may have been the origin of the Locrians, +they bore in ancient times a very respectable character, +for they defeated the Crotoniats in the battle on the Sagra. +The Greek proverb ἀληθέστερα τῶν ἐπὶ Σάγρᾳ must probably +not be taken quite literally, at least, not in our +narrative, in which it is said that the Dioscuri decided the +issue of the contest. In like manner, St. James is said to +have appeared on a white charger in the army of Ferdinand +Cortez: a distinguished officer, who had been present at +every point of the battle and seen nothing, got himself out +of the difficulty by saying, that he had not been worthy to +behold the saint. Such, also, may have been the case with +the Dioscuri in the battle on the Sagra. At all events, +however, the Locrians, through that battle, secured their +independence, and for a period of 150 years thereafter, they +lived in happy prosperity, which was disturbed by Dionysius, +who endeavoured to gain influence in the Greek towns of +Italy by marrying a citizen of one of them. A Rhegine +maiden being refused to him, he took a Locrian for his wife. +For this reason Locri was greatly favoured; but after +Dionysius’ death, his son, on being obliged to withdraw +from Sicily, betook himself to Locri, where he raged like a +Nero or an Elagabalus. When, afterwards, he was forced +to return to Sicily, the Locrians took vengeance on his +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_202">[202]</span>family, and then had to sustain a siege, during which, there +being no hope of pardon, they offered a most vigorous +resistance, and risked their all upon it. Their territory +fell into the hands of the Bruttians, but in the war of +Pyrrhus, Locri was still a considerable state. On that +occasion, however, they acted an unworthy part: they first +requested the Romans to send them a garrison against the +Bruttians, and then betrayed it into the hands of Pyrrhus. +After this, Pyrrhus placed a garrison of Italicans and Bruttians +there, who again betrayed the town to the Romans. +Sixty years later, the Locrians delivered up a Roman +garrison into the hands of Hannibal: they then repented of +their treachery—a fickleness which, often occurs among the +Greeks—and again opened their gates to the Romans. But +this last act was not set down to their credit, for Q. Pleminius, +who was left behind there by Scipio with a garrison, conducted +himself like the commanders of the troops of the +League during the thirty years’ war, like Colonel Hatzfeld +at Rostock, and as the imperial commanders in general, +with their Croats, conducted themselves in Germany. Pleminius +treated the town as if it had been taken by the +sword; at length, however, the Locrians succeeded in +inducing the Roman senate to interfere, and to punish the +offender; the account of his conduct gives us some idea of +the manner in which war was carried on in those times. +The town continued to exist after these events, but was +quite insignificant; its greatest importance consisted in a +temple of Proserpine with a rich treasury. Pyrrhus had +plundered the sanctuary, but being warned by visions in a +dream, he restored the treasures; Q. Pleminius afterwards +plundered it more effectually.</p> + +<p>The next town, <span class="smcap">Rhegium</span>, was a Chalcidian colony, of +a much more recent date than the others, being founded +about Olymp. 50. During the period when it was the +residence of Anaxilaus, it was a powerful city. At the time +of the Sicilian expedition, Rhegium, like all the other Chalcidian +towns, was allied with Athens. The Rhegines refused +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_203">[203]</span>to give one of their daughters in marriage to Dionysius, and +were injudicious enough to insult him, by saying that they +had no other girl suited to him except the daughter of the +hangman, which was the most offensive thing they could +have done. At the time when Corsica was still independent, +no Corsican ever took the office of hangman, but from +hatred of Genoa, the Corsicans always appointed a Genoese. +Dionysius laid siege to the town, and the Rhegines +defended themselves with the courage of lions, but were +overpowered; and their fate was terrible. But the situation +of the town is so fortunate, that a town will always exist +there in spite of earthquakes and other ravages. A hundred +years later, Rhegium was, if possible, still more unfortunate. +In the war of Pyrrhus, a Campanian legion, at the request +of the Rhegines themselves, was sent there by the +Romans, for the purpose of cutting off the communication +between Pyrrhus and the Mamertines in Sicily. But this +garrison, under the command of Decius Jubellius, massacred +the male inhabitants, and took possession of their wives and +children. At the conclusion of the war, the Romans took +the town by force, and the 300 survivors of the 4,000 who +had composed the Campanian legion, were beheaded in the +Forum at Rome. The surviving Rhegines were then called +together, and their territory was restored to them. Henceforth, +Rhegium remained a prosperous little commercial +town, and experienced no further misfortunes.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Hipponium</span>, a colony of Locri, was taken and destroyed +by the Bruttians, and then rebuilt by the Carthaginians, +which is the only instance of a Carthaginian town in Italy. +During the latter period of Agathocles, and shortly before +the war with Pyrrhus, the Bruttians seem again to have +been masters of the place. Afterwards the Romans established +a colony there, under the name of <i>Vibo Valentia</i>.</p> + +<p>Proceeding along the coast in a northern direction, we +come to <span class="smcap">Laos</span>, on the line which subsequently formed the +frontier between Lucania and Bruttium. It was a colony of +Sybaris, and is celebrated on account of the defeat sustained +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_204">[204]</span>by the united towns of Magna Graecia, especially Thurii, +against the Lucanians, who wanted to relieve the town from +a siege. At that time, the Lucanians had already extended +themselves along the coast, and Posidonia was their first +conquest.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Pyxus</span> or <span class="smcap">Buxentum</span>, between Laos and Posidonia, +was founded by the Rhegines at the time of Anaxilaus and +Micythus, who were contemporaries of Darius Hystaspis. +There can be no doubt that it was afterwards taken by the +Lucanians, but it was snatched from them by the Romans, +who surrendered it to the Campanians at the settlement +they made with them, whence Buxentum is afterwards +mentioned among the Campanian towns. After the Hannibalian +war, the Romans established a colony there.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Elea</span> or <span class="smcap">Velia</span>, a town which preserved its Greek +character in a wonderful manner, was situated not far from +Buxentum. It was a colony of the Phocaeans, established +in the reign of Cyrus, after they had in vain endeavoured +to form a settlement in Corsica (Olymp. 60). In the history +of literature, Elea is remarkable for the great and profound +philosophers who formed the Eleatic school. As Amalfi, +though surrounded by Lombard armies, preserved its pure +Italian and Roman character, so Elea remained a Greek +place down to the latest times. The father of the poet +Statius was a Greek of Elea, and Statius’ <i>Graia Selle</i> is +nothing else than Elea, as Markland has shown; some persons +have strangely referred it to Epirus, and some perhaps +do so still. Elea was allied with Rome, and was honoured +and distinguished by her. It perished at a time which can +no longer be defined, in consequence of the ravages of +barbarians.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Posidonia</span> or <span class="smcap">Paestum</span> was the most powerful among +the Greek cities on that coast. The place still has the most +beautiful Greek ruins in all Italy, and three ancient temples +are preserved there in tolerable completeness; before the +first half of the eighteenth century, they were not known +at all, for they were not discovered till 1730. The cause +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_205">[205]</span>of this may have been the circumstance, that they are +situated in a very pestilential and deserted district; but at +present they are known to everybody. The ruins belong +to the ancient Greek period, when Posidonia was still +powerful. There have also been found great numbers of coins +of a very ancient style, resembling those of Sybaris, which +are at least as old as the sixtieth Olympiad, and perhaps +even older. Posidonia was conquered by the Lucanians, +though it is unknown at what time, and it remained under +their dominion until the war of Pyrrhus, when the Romans +established a colony there under the name of Paestum. +The fact, that previously the Lucanians had a colony there, +is clear from the account of Aristoxenus, in Athenaeus, about +an annual festival which the inhabitants celebrated quite in +the ancient Greek fashion, and at which they, among other +things, complained of their losing their Greek character +and peculiarities, and of their becoming barbarians in +consequence of their being ruled over by barbarians. +Athenaeus indeed mentions the Romans as their rulers, +but he is either mistaken in the name, or the book which +he quotes was not by Aristoxenus, but a <i>pseudepigraphon</i>, +which is certainly possible. It is interesting on this occasion +to become acquainted with the nature of the colonies, +and with the manner in which a new ruling class of men +establish themselves among the people, introducing their +language and manners to such an extent as to cause the +nationality of the ancient inhabitants to disappear. The +most striking example of this phenomenon is the diffusion +of the language and manners of the Arabs over the East +and Africa: all the languages which were previously spoken +there, Greek, Latin, Egyptian, and Syriac, having given +way to the Arabic. In like manner, the Turkish language +has become predominant in Armenia and Hyrcania. This +accounts for the fact, that, although the Arab immigration +into Spain was not very numerous in comparison with the +ancient inhabitants, yet when in the thirteenth century +Andalusia was re-conquered by the Christians, the people +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_206">[206]</span>spoke nothing but Arabic. The Ommayad khalifs had introduced +the Arabic language by putting to death any one +refusing to adopt it. The term colony, therefore, is very +vague: we generally imagine that the colonists constitute +the real body of the people; but this is not so, for the +colony only furnishes the form. I very well remember, +that about thirty-five years ago, when I read that account +of Aristoxenus, the matter appeared to me strange; but the +mixture of the two nationalities clears up everything.</p> + +<h3 id="Etruria"><span class="smcap">Etruria.</span></h3> + +<p>Etruria is in every respect a highly important and interesting +country, and in ancient history it is at the same +time great and powerful; it derives a particular interest +from the fact of its being the mother country of the modern +Tuscans, a people on whom all the honour of Italy, in regard +to intellectual and artistic greatness, rested during the +middle ages no less than in modern times, just as the honour +of Greece rested on Athens. In the whole range of modern +history there is not a people, which is so strongly marked +with the antique character as the Florentines; they possess +all the great qualities of the Athenians, without their light-headedness. +They also have been too severely judged of; +I do not, indeed, mean to say that they are faultless, but +they are, in spite of any faults, deserving of the highest +respect. A man who is familiar with the old Italian literature +and history, cannot but feel the greatest affection and +attachment to Tuscany, and this affection and attachment +are unconsciously transferred to the ancestors of the modern +Tuscans. But the great renown enjoyed by the ancient +Etruscans is not owing to this, but rather to the irresistible +charm with which man is drawn towards that which is +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_207">[207]</span>mysterious and enigmatical. We can, indeed, see that +the Etruscans were a very remarkable people, and that in +regard to the fine arts, they occupy, next to the Greeks, +the highest rank in antiquity; yet so many monuments +and inscriptions of this same people are perfect mysteries +to us; inscriptions exist in great numbers, but are altogether +inexplicable. All the statements of the ancients +about the Etruscans are full of contradiction. The difficulties +have been increased by the opinion which has been established +for a long time, that the Romans derived the +greater part of their institutions and character from the +Etruscans, an opinion which formerly I also entertained. +But I have given it up, and in the second edition of my +Roman History I have honestly stated my reasons. The +cause of the great confusion among the ancients about +them is the supposition that the Etruscans and Tyrrhenians +were the same people. I have shown in my +history that the Greeks, who are here our only authorities, +as we have no other statements, called the Tyrrhenians +Pelasgians, and Tyrrhenians existed not only on the coasts +of Etruria, but occupied the whole coast of Italy down to +the Oenotrian frontier, before the Ausonians subdued those +districts. Being Pelasgians, the Tyrrhenians, according to +the views of the Greeks, were of the same race as the +ancient Meonians in Lydia, as the inhabitants of Lemnos +and the islands near the Hellespont, and as the occupants +of the neighbouring coasts. Hence also the tradition about +the connection between the two. These original inhabitants +of Etruria, from Luna as far as the Tiber, were then +overpowered by a nation invading Italy from northern +Europe, just as we have seen in the case of the Illyrians; Greek +historians afterwards called the conquerors Tyrrhenians, +partly because a large proportion of the population of Etruria +actually was Tyrrhenian, and partly because the whole +country bore the name Tyrrhenia. In like manner the English +are called Britons, and the Spaniards in Mexico and Peru +Mexicans and Peruvians; and in the same way the Greeks +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_208">[208]</span>applied the name Oscans to the Sabellians inhabiting +Lucania and Samnium, although the Oscans were the subjects +and the Sabellians the ruling people. As the conquerors +have often entirely changed the language of the conquered +people (the coins of Posidonia, when in the end it had +become Roman, have Latin inscriptions in Latin characters), +so the language of the Tyrrhenians, under the dominion of +the Etruscans, gave way to the language of the rulers; and +hence we cannot be surprised at finding on Etruscan +monuments none but the mysterious Etruscan language. +I mentioned before the Mexicans as an illustration: the +Spaniards who conquered Mexico amounted only to a few +thousands, while the country they subdued contained many +millions of inhabitants. The latter, it is true, were extirpated +by inhuman cruelty, epidemics, and the like; but still +the fact of the Spanish language having become quite universal +there remains a remarkable phenomenon. The Spanish +colonists had scarcely any women with them, and accordingly +took native Mexican women for their wives, whence +we might expect to find the Spanish language would have +disappeared all the more naturally and easily. It is a foolish +opinion to believe that the depopulation of Spain was the +consequence of the emigration to the provinces in America; +for the number of emigrants to the new world was on the +whole but small. Granting that in the course of time a +few hundred thousand emigrated, the men who arrived +there entirely without families, exercised such an influence +upon the language of millions, that at present not a man +in the city of Mexico speaks Mexican, and the native +language exists only in the remotest districts; the commonest +Indian speaks Spanish. There are even large provinces +in New Spain where the ancient language has entirely +disappeared, without its being possible to show that any +considerable immigrations ever took place. In the Baltic +provinces of Mecklenburg and Pomerania, where the +ruling families have always remained the same, where the +nobility consists for the most part of Wendish families, and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_209">[209]</span>where the Germans have never appeared as conquerors, +the Wendish language is entirely lost, merely because the +introduction of Christianity from Germany was in the +course of a few centuries followed by the German language. +The ancient Tyrrhenian language may, even before the +conquest, have become unsettled and shifting, as the Umbrians +occupied the interior of the country while the +Tyrrhenians inhabited the coasts.</p> + +<p>The inquiries into the Etruscan language have hitherto +yielded no results at all; all the alleged explanations by +Mazzochi, Passeri, and Lanzi are mere delusions. I must +direct your particular attention to the incredibly small compass +of what is commonly called learning. Common sense +has often been most disgracefully trampled under foot, and +intuitive truth has been overlooked and disregarded; and +this has been the case more particularly in the inquiries +about the ancient Italian languages. People have been +extremely anxious to discover the Etruscan language, and +who should not be so? I would readily give a considerable +part of my property as a prize to any one who should discover +it; an entirely new light would thereby be thrown +upon the character of the nations of Italy. But desirable as +this object is, it does not follow that it is attainable; it is deplorable, +however, if people assume it to be attainable without +examining as to whether the method they adopt be the +correct one. Passeri and Lanzi enjoy quite an undeserved +reputation; they have treated the ancient Italian languages +of the Etruscans and Umbrians in quite a disgraceful manner; +and I have many years ago expressed my indignation +at the absurdity with which the inquiry is pursued. Lanzi +assumes that Etruscans and Tyrrhenians are the same,—a +fact which has never been doubted—that Tyrrhenians are +Pelasgians, and that Pelasgians are ancient Greeks: he then +proceeds, without having any general principle to guide +him, to interpret words merely according to some remote +resemblance in sound to Greek or Latin words, and by this +process he elicits a sense which is no better than if it had +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_210">[210]</span>been his object to make the whole inquiry ridiculous. Any +one who has a taste for Greek must reject such trash with +the greatest indignation. There are only a very few words +the meaning of which can be guessed: on all the tomb-stones +we read <i>avil ril</i> followed by a number (the Etruscan +and Roman numbers are the same), whence we may suppose +these two words to mean <i>vixit annos</i>; sometimes we find <i>ril</i> +alone, which may accordingly mean “year.” It is possible +that the word is indeclinable, and it may even be imagined that +all nouns in Etruscan, as in many eastern languages, are indeclinable. +Now Lanzi, not being able to find a similar +word in Greek or Latin, objects to the interpretation of +these words which alone are known; and he connects <i>avil</i>, +which probably signifies <i>vixit</i>, with the Greek αἰών, though +he would prefer a word with a stronger resemblance. On +several works of art we find the word <i>turce</i> added to a +name, which he interprets ἐποίει, and I will let this pass; +but he adds that <i>turce</i> is nothing but the contracted τὸ ἔρξε, +that is, τοὖρξε. Such things have found admirers, and +even in Germany! I feel no inclination to speculate where +I do not stand on firm ground; but it certainly is much +more probable, that <i>ce</i> is the termination of the noun, like +<i>us</i> in Latin; and accordingly I say “<i>turce</i> may be the same +as <i>Tuscus</i>, for <i>r</i> and <i>s</i> are very often interchanged.” In the +fifteenth century, a number of bronze tables were found at +Gubbio in Umbria, with inscriptions partly in Etruscan and +partly in Latin characters, but in an unknown language: +who knows what these tables contain! A man with the +faculty of divination possessed by Champollion might perhaps +be able to explain the language, but it requires a full +consciousness of the analogy of languages; this is the only +way in which it might be made out, but it is impossible to +explain it by itself. The Italians, like Passeri, have proceeded +on the supposition that the Etruscans were <i>haruspices</i>, +interpreters of lightning, and the like, and that consequently +their monuments contain all kinds of <i>fulguratio</i>: on such +premises they then attempted to translate the inscriptions with +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_211">[211]</span>a truly revolting impertinence: you can scarcely form an +idea of this kind of nonsense. I say this because I have been +described as wanting in modesty by people who no doubt may +have been extremely modest all their lives; and the remark +has been added, that I had not read the productions of those +inquirers. But I have read Lanzi’s work, and deliberately +declare that it is thoroughly bad. Lanzi was a man of +talent and acuteness, but completely ignorant of Greek literature, +and he had but a poor knowledge of Latin. He was an +encyclopaedist, who undertook much, but finished only half +of what he undertook. I have here expressed my conviction +with the fullest confidence, that it is not only my conviction, +but the pure truth. It is possible that a resemblance may be +discovered between the Etruscan and the Ligurian language.</p> + +<p>The ancients were far less concerned about the Etruscans +than the moderns; they took indeed an interest in them, but +did not enter deeply into the inquiry about them; and it may +be that they were prevented by their utter ignorance of the +Etruscan language. Herodotus relates that the Etruscans +were a Lydian colony, a statement which has been correctly +refuted even by Dionysius, who says that Xanthus the +Lydian did not say anything about it; that the Lydians did +not bear the slightest resemblance to the Etruscans in language, +customs, manners, or religion; and that there existed +no traditions about such a colony either among the Lydians +or among the Etruscans. Herodotus had heard, that Tyrrhenians +existed in Italy as well as in Lydia (where, however, +the Meonians, and not the entirely foreign Lydians, +were Tyrrhenians); his idea of a colony was a mere inference +from his knowledge that the Tyrrhenians and Meonians +were nations of the same race. But Tyrrheni and Tusci are +the same words, and so are Tyrrheni, Turini, Turni; Tusculum +is nothing but the town of the Tyrrheni; Etrusci and +Tusci, however, are different, and the name Tusci was afterwards +transferred to the Etrusci. The native name of the +Etruscans was Rasena. Previously to the Gallic conquest, +the same Etruscan nation was also established in the plains +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_212">[212]</span>of Lombardy; and, according to Livy, all the tribes about the +river Padus, such as the Raeti and others belonged to it. +It is, moreover, quite in accordance with all analogy to suppose +that the nation had come down from the Alps in consequence +of commotions in the north. Here we must also +bear in mind the other tradition which states that, before the +time of the Etruscans, the Umbrians dwelt in Etruria, and +that 300 Umbrian towns were destroyed by the invading +Etruscans. No importance can be attached to the number +300, which is only a multiple of 3; 3, 30, 300, and 600, all +signify only “very many,” and in other circumstances the +same might be expressed by 4, 16, 64, etc. I am persuaded +that the time is not far distant (it may have arrived already), +when no man will think of quoting the statement of Herodotus +about the Lydian origin of the Tyrrhenians as an +authority against other opinions. Everything which, after +the lapse of hundreds or thousands of years, has to be made +out by reason and argument meets with opposition, and this +is in accordance with nature; nay, it is good that it is so, +as it imposes upon us the duty to give to our doctrines +the greatest possible distinctness, and to expound them so +clearly as to make them intelligible to all.</p> + +<p>It is well-known that Etruria, south of the Apennines, +contained twelve ruling towns, to which the others were +subject. We must not, however, suppose that there existed +no more than twelve places deserving the name of towns, +but they were twelve sovereign cities, and all the others +were dependent upon them. This fact is certain and beyond +all doubt. They were all situated within the district from +the Apennines about Luna and the Tiber. But which +of the Etruscan towns they were, is quite a different +question; some of them are certain, others can be named +only with probability, while others, again, can only be +guessed. Descending from the north, we find the following +towns, which Livy, in his account of the second Punic +war, distinctly affirms, were ruling cities: Volaterrae, +Populonia, Rusellae, and Tarquinii; and in the interior, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_213">[213]</span>Arretium, Perusia, Caere and Clusium. Four accordingly +are wanting, either because they had perished, or because +they had ceased to belong to the Etruscan nation. Veii and +Vulsinii had been destroyed, and Capena had become a +Roman municipium. But whether Capena ever was one +of the sovereign cities, may seem doubtful. All these +relations belong to so remote a period, and the notices we +have of them in the ancient authors are so vague, that we +must be extremely cautious. The case of Cortona is particularly +doubtful. Livy, near the close of the first decad,⁠<a id="FNanchor_57" href="#Footnote_57" class="fnanchor">[57]</a> +mentions it as an Etruscan town; but at the time of the +second Punic war he does not name it among those which +distinguished themselves by the support they gave to Scipio. +Herodotus, in speaking of his own time, says that Cortona⁠<a id="FNanchor_58" href="#Footnote_58" class="fnanchor">[58]</a> +was inhabited by Pelasgians who were foreign to the Tyrrhenians, +that is, to the Etruscans and Ombricans. This is a +great mystery, which it is impossible to solve with any +degree of certainty. Had Cortona become Etruscan in the +middle of the fifth century, while during the first half of +the fourth it was still Tyrrhenian? or did Herodotus +transfer to his own time that which was correctly applicable +only to an earlier period? Different conjectures may +be entertained as to why it is not mentioned in the second +Punic war: Livy either forgot it, or the town had, perhaps, +not been included in the general peace which the Etruscans +concluded with the Romans at the time of the war with +Pyrrhus; it is possible also that it may have concluded a +separate peace, or that it had been conquered. For the +books of Livy and Dionysius, containing the account of that +period, are lost, and the brief extracts furnish no satisfactory +information. We may, therefore, have recourse to several +modes of explanation, but we must be cautious and not +regard as certain what is merely possible.</p> + +<p>One or two places at the least, therefore, are still wanting. +On the coast we find Cossa, a large town, the walls of +which still exist, and show that the place was strongly +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_214">[214]</span>fortified. But it is called Cossa Volcientium, whence it is +probable that it was no more Etruscan than Falerii, which, +geographically speaking, likewise belonged to Etruria. +We may, however, take it almost for certain that Faesulae, +situated beyond Florence, was one of the twelve towns. +It is not indeed mentioned in the history of the wars with +the Romans, that is, in the ninth and tenth books of Livy; +but we can draw no inference from this, as the eleventh and +twelfth books are wanting. From these last we should +have learned, whether at that period it was one of the +Etruscan towns or not.</p> + +<p>In a physical point of view, Etruria may be divided into +three parts. The central portion is formed by the main +stock of the Apennines, both those in the neighbourhood +of Siena and those in the north of the river Arno, for they +belong together, having been separated only by the hand +of man to make an opening for letting the Arno pass +through. This part comprises the whole of the Apennines, +which now separate Tuscany from Bologna and Romagna, +together with the interior from the neighbourhood of Siena +to the Roman towns of Aquapendente and Viterbo. This +range of mountains contains indeed many beautiful valleys, +but in some parts there are none, and on the frontiers of +Tuscany and Bologna the country consists of rough, wild +and inhospitable mountains, which at present have scarcely +any wood at all; in ancient times it was different, for thick +forests appear to have existed at least on the frontiers of +Etruria and the country of the Gauls. The second part +comprises the whole territory extending below Volterra, +the so-called Maremma, or hilly coast land. It embraced +the whole of <i>Suburbicaria Tuscia</i>, the modern Patrimonio +di. S. Pietro, a district formerly containing the towns of +Vulsinii and Saturnia, and at present Tuscanella and others, +and extending to the very gates of Rome. The geological +character of this part is quite different from that of the +Apennines; it is of a volcanic nature, the lakes of Vulsinii, +Bacanae, and all the others in that district are decayed +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_215">[215]</span>craters, and volcanic stones and productions of every kind +are found there in all directions as on the opposite side of +the Tiber. The country is at present extremely unhealthy, +and was in all probability never quite healthy on account +of the bad quality of the water; there seem to be really +poisonous exhalations. In ancient times, however, important +towns existed there notwithstanding, and there was +no doubt a corresponding degree of agriculture; at the +time when Florence and Siena were flourishing republics, +the state of the country was likewise better than it is now. +It was ruined by the princes of the house of Medici, who +made the towns responsible for the whole amount of taxes, +as is the custom in the East; when one place was decayed, +the others had to make up the sum among themselves. In +some parts this system was carried so far, that during the +second half of the seventeenth century, under Cosmo III., +whole villages were ruined; and it was the greatest misfortune +for the country that this Cosmo reigned for a period +of half a century. In this manner the country became +desolate by fiscal extortions. Wherever the population +has once become extinct, it rarely re-appears; the emperor +Leopold II. did every thing in his power to mend matters, +but it was of little avail. The third part comprising the +marshy country from the Arno as far as the Gonfalina, +is a large and low district with many marshes and lakes, +extending as far as Luna and Pescia; it has quite the appearance +of the countries in the Netherlands. In the time +of Hannibal, it was one continuous marsh, but he made his +way through it, and deceived the Romans, who thought it +impossible for him to advance through that morass, and +accordingly considered themselves quite safe. We may say +in general that the manner, in which the Romans at that +time carried on the war, was beneath all criticism. The +upper Arno was formerly a lake, and near Faesulae, too, +there was a lake, but they have been drained by making a +passage for the waters through the Gonfalina and La’ncisa.</p> + +<p>I shall now proceed to give you an account of the separate +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_216">[216]</span>towns, mentioning at once the things for which they were +remarkable at different periods, for our time is too short +accurately to separate the geography of the different +periods.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Luca.</span> The northern part about Luca was afterwards in +the hands of the Ligurians, and nothing is known about it +in regard to the Etruscan period. Soon after the Hannibalian +war, the town was taken by the Romans who +established a colony there, for the purpose of securing the +possession of the country. Throughout the middle ages, +Luca was a place of considerable importance.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Luna</span>, situated on the sea-coast, in the neighbourhood of +the modern Carrara, was anciently likewise Etruscan, and of +importance to Rome on account of its excellent harbour. +The whole coast of Etruria has but few harbours, and there +is only one other at Populonia; but that of Luna had the +advantage of being at once the nearest and very good. +Before the Romans had formed a communication with Spain +by land, the military communication with that country was +kept up by means of the port of Luna; and the Romans +had long been masters of the greater part of Spain, before +the communication through Gaul was opened. Luna was +also important on account of its quarries of white marble, +called <i>marmor Lunense</i>. The Romans did not commence to +work in marble till a very late period: before the time of +Augustus it was not very extensively used, and he first +erected buildings of native marble. During Cicero’s youth +the Romans began to employ Carystian and Numidian +(yellow) marble in private houses, no doubt, for small +pillars; and in the time of Pompey, the use of foreign +marble became a little more common. But in the reign of +Augustus it became very general, whence marbles of every +kind are found in the ruins; Carrara marble was employed +in vast quantities, the white Pentelian was less common. +After the time of Augustus, it was customary to use bricks for +the internal parts of walls, and to cover or incrustate, as the +Italians say, the outside with slabs of marble. At a later +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_217">[217]</span>period of the empire this custom extended so far, that it +became an indispensable luxury to cover the walls even of +private houses with most costly kinds of marble. The +temple of Apollo on the Palatine seems to have been constructed +of solid Carrara marble. When the Romans advanced +as far as Luna, the Etruscans were, probably, no +longer masters of the place, but it seems to have belonged +to the Ligurians. In the middle ages it was destroyed by +the Saracens.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Pisa</span> also appears to have been Etruscan, but it never +was a sovereign city. It is regarded as a colony of Pisa +in Elis (whence <i>Pisae Alpheae</i> in Virgil); but this is a +groundless fancy, and it is an undoubted fact that Pisa was +an ancient Tyrrhenian place. In the Hannibalian war, it +was an important military station to the Romans, who succeeded +in remaining masters of it. Afterwards it became a +military colony. The great importance of the place is +manifest from the number of ruins and remains of every +description, although the town is not often spoken of. In +the middle ages it rose rapidly and became great at once, +just as the gods in the Aeneid step forth from the clouds, +without any one having anticipated them. In the eleventh +century, when the Pisans constructed their cathedral with +its baptistery and tower, Pisa must have been a city of +gigantic power and greatness. Its inhabitants possessed a +wonderful taste for the arts even during the darkest periods +of the middle ages, when at Venice (I will not mention +Rome which was quite barbarous) not the slightest trace of +such a taste was perceptible. The Venetians, as late as the +thirteenth century, melted down all the Greek works of art +in bronze which they could carry away; the preservation +of the colossal horses from Chios, in the Piazza S. Marco, is +almost a mere accident: the strange deliberation as to +whether they should be melted down or not, is well known. +For half a century afterwards the horses stood neglected in +some shed, until civilisation advanced, and they were set up +in their present place. At Pisa, on the other hand, the taste +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_218">[218]</span>for the arts was so far developed that, as early as the eleventh +century, the city employed an architect, probably from the +south of France (his name is Bruschetti, as is stated in the excellent +inscriptions), to build a church, which is as magnificent +as any structure belonging to the period of the emperors of declining +Rome, or of the Byzantine rulers. The Pisans, moreover, +carefully collected during their expeditions, especially +at Rome, columns and other antiquities, and obtained similar +treasures as presents from the emperors. During the twelfth +century they collected fragments of ancient architecture, +sculptures, and especially sarcophagi which they put together +in their cemetery (Campo Santo); they then surrounded +the cemetery with a wall and a portico, and thus affectionately +preserved the remains of antiquity. The bodies of +men of rank were buried in these sarcophagi. Such was the +spirit in which Nicolo Pisano, a gigantic genius of the +middle of the thirteenth century, made bas-reliefs more +beautiful than any that were produced at Rome during the +third century of our era; not only does he show great +genius in invention, but also in the beauty of his sculptures. +The civic laws of the Pisans were based upon remnants of +the Roman law, nay, edicts of praetors, which had not been +introduced into the Justinianean Code, were preserved +there; so that Pisa, at a later period, remained an essentially +Roman city, though it was governed by a Lombard nobility. +The vicissitudes of Pisa were terrible and deplorable. The +Genoese overpowered and cruelly destroyed it: the more +bravely and valiantly the city resisted, the more fearful was +its destruction. Afterwards it was subdued by the Florentines. +No republic ever carried the persecution of its +subjects so far as Florence carried that of the Pisans. The +Florentines distrusted them so much, that the Pisans were +not only excluded from all honourable offices, but were not +allowed even within their own city to practise certain professions +or engage in certain trades; they were not allowed, +e.g., to embrace the professions of physicians and lawyers, +or to carry on a wholesale mercantile business, but they +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_219">[219]</span>were limited to the small and common trades. The consequence +of this was an insurrection, but the Pisans were +subdued, and of the 100,000 inhabitants which Pisa had had +during the middle ages, not more than 8,000 remained at the +time when Cosmo de Medici entered upon the government. +Athens was in a similar state of decay during the period +from Alexander to the last Philip of Macedonia.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Volaterrae</span>, no doubt one of the ancient sovereign +cities, was situated at some distance from the coast. In +the history of the Roman wars, it acted a very prominent +part; and from the vigorous manner in which it supported +Scipio, we see what a powerful place it must have been; +but it distinguished itself more especially by the resistance +it offered to Sulla. When the fate of the whole Marian +party was already decided, Volaterrae still sustained a war +for two years, and did not surrender until it was compelled +by want of provisions. We do not know what was the fate +of the town, but we do know the character of the conqueror, +and may therefore presume that it was a most +fearful one. Sulla established a military colony there, and +deprived the inhabitants of the franchise. The ancient +circumference of the city can still be distinctly traced: it +occupied all the surface of a very considerable hill, which +rises above the lower hills of an almost level and beautiful +country. The wall clearly shows the difference between +the Pelasgo-Cyclopean and the more artistic Etruscan mode +of fortification. The Etruscan fortifications were constructed +along the upper edge of a hill as real walls, and the sides +of the hill below the walls were not cut precipitous; the +Pelasgian places, on the other hand, have no walls on the +edge of the hills, but the sides of the rock are cut down +so as to be precipitous, and are provided with substructions. +Another difference consists in the fact, that the Etruscan +walls are built of regular square blocks, forming parallelograms +one perpendicularly above the other. The blocks +are very large, and generally put together without cement, +their edges being cut very sharp. The fortifications of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_220">[220]</span>Volaterrae are among the most perfect. After the time of +Sulla, or at least after that of Augustus, Volaterrae was a +military colony. It was the birth-place of the poet Persius, +who for this reason more than once alludes to the circumstances +of his native place, and can be understood only +by those who are acquainted with them. The hill on +which Volaterrae stood, consists of alabaster, in consequence +of which many works in that material were executed there; +hence the sarcophagi of Volaterrae with Etruscan inscriptions, +are made of alabaster. During the middle ages +the town was still very considerable; but it has decayed, +especially through the greatness of Florence.</p> + +<p>The next place after Volaterrae in the south is <span class="smcap">Populonia</span>, +<span class="smcap">Populonii</span> or <span class="smcap">Populonium</span>, for all these forms +occur. On Etruscan coins it is called <i>Puplana</i>, for the +Etruscan alphabet has no <i>o</i> nor any short vowels. There +is a statement which seems quite credible that Populonia +was a colony of Volaterrae. In later times it was one of +the more important Etruscan towns, and acted a prominent +part in the wars against Rome, of which an account is +given in the tenth book of Livy. It had the sovereignty +of the neighbouring island of <i>Ilva</i> or <i>Aethalia</i>, a Greek +name suggestive of its Pelasgian origin. The mountain +of this island consists of large masses of iron, which by +the Catalanian method can easily be transformed into the +most excellent steel. The west of Europe was, to a great +extent, provided with iron from Elba, as it was imported +into the eastern parts from the Black Sea. The working +of the mines of Elba, however, seems to be of a more +recent date than the composition of the Odyssey, for in this +poem the south of Italy is provided with iron from Temese. +The ancients notice it as a singular phenomenon, that the +iron could not be smelted in Elba, and that it was necessary +to do this on the continent; but this is a Greek absurdity, +and an inability to comprehend things connected with +ordinary life, which we not unfrequently meet with in the +ancients. It was reported in Greece, that it was necessary +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_221">[221]</span>to transport the iron to Populonia, and the imagination of +the Greeks immediately invented a reason. The truth is +simply this: in later times there was a want of wood in +Elba, and it was found cheaper to convey the iron to +Populonia, than to import wood into Elba, for Populonia +possessed smelting establishments. In like manner, the +copper ore found in Cornwall is conveyed to Wales and +smelted there. Populonia was a wealthy maritime town +until it was destroyed by Sulla; and from that time it +has been a heap of ruins, which were seen by Strabo. The +town was never restored.</p> + +<p>The moderns who have written on ancient geography +are tolerably unanimous in their opinions, that <span class="smcap">Vetulonium</span> +was situated in the neighbourhood of Populonia. +Dionysius mentions it as a large city, which carried on +war against Rome, while Livy does not notice it either +in the first decad, where he describes the great Etruscan +war, or in his account of the Hannibalian war, or in any +other place. It must accordingly have disappeared at a +time of which we know nothing. There exist coins with +Etruscan inscriptions, which unquestionably belong to +Vetulonium. In a forest near Populonia large ruins are +found, which have been assigned to Vetulonium, but this +is a mere conjecture, and nothing can be said with any +degree of certainty about the situation of the place. I +have often thought, that it might possibly be Orviedo +which was called <i>Urbs vetus</i> as early as the eighth century. +However, the place has entirely disappeared, and all that +is said about it rests on mere conjecture.</p> + +<p>There now follow <span class="smcap">Rusellae</span> and <span class="smcap">Cossa</span>, the latter of +which, as I have already observed, was probably not an +Etruscan town; at a later time it received a Latin colony.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Tarquinii</span> appears in our histories as an Etruscan town, +but that in the most ancient times it was a real Tyrrhenian +place, is attested by the tradition of its having been founded +by Thessalians; the name Tarchon, which is mentioned as +archegetes and is connected with Telephus, points in the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_222">[222]</span>same direction. At the time when Tarquinii is drawn into +the traditions about Rome, and connected with Tarquinius +Priscus, it probably is still a Tyrrhenian town. In the +war with Pyrrhus, Tarquinii, like nearly all the Etruscan +towns, formed an alliance with Rome in a general peace, of +which I shall speak in the third volume of my History of +Rome. By this peace the Etruscan towns were placed in +a relation to Rome quite different from that of the other +towns of Italy, because the Romans were anxious to gratify +their wishes in order to prevent their forming connections +with Pyrrhus. This is one of the occurrences where Providence +directly interferes in the affairs of the world for +the purpose of saving a state from destruction. Such also +was the peace between Russia and Turkey in 1812, whereby +the French army was prevented from retreating to +Turkey, and was thus left to its fate. In like manner, +Soltikoff, after the battle of Kunersdorf, ordered his troops +to stand still. The determination of the Etruscan towns to +accept the peace of the Romans forms a similar turning +point in ancient history. After this, Tarquinii remained +faithful to Rome, until it disappeared in the time of the +Roman emperors. In the age of Cicero it still existed; in +the war of Sulla it was probably not destroyed, though +severe sufferings may have been inflicted upon it. The site +which it once occupied, the modern Corneto, is remarkable +for the monuments which are discovered there, and are +more numerous than in any other place of Etruria. They +are made of clay, and are of a very peculiar character, approaching +the Grecian style, while those found in the interior +of Etruria are altogether different in workmanship from +Greek monuments. The decay of Tarquinii must perhaps +be ascribed to the choking up of its good harbour, and to the +rise of <i>Centumcellae</i>, one of the few places in Italy the +origin of which belongs to a late period. Until the time +of Trajan no town existed there; it was only a summer +palace of the emperor with a mineral spring, for that +volcanic region contains many hot springs. Trajan, who in +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_223">[223]</span>general did much to promote the navigation of the Italians, +built a harbour there, and constructed the <i>molo</i> which still +forms the harbour of Civita Vecchia; and near it arose the +town which received its name of Centumcellae from the imperial +palace. The town continued to increase in importance, +especially during the period of the decay of the empire, when +the Portus of Rome became more and more filled up, while +that of Centumcellae was capable of receiving larger ships. +The Saracens took the place, but the inhabitants withdrew, +and built in the interior of the country the town of +<i>Leopolis</i>, named after pope Leo IV. When, in consequence +of the victory of Ostia, the danger of the Saracens was +removed, the inhabitants of Centumcellae returned, and +from that time the town has been called <i>Civita Vecchia</i>. It +is, therefore, not an Etruscan, but a Roman town.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Caere</span> with the port towns of <i>Fregenae</i>, <i>Alsium</i>, and +<i>Pyrgi</i>, was situated nearer the mouth of the Tiber. Caere +was anciently called <i>Agylla</i>, and as such it is said to have +been Pelasgian or Thessalian: it is, moreover, expressly mentioned +that the town was taken by the Etruscans. As +later writers believed in the Lydian origin of the Etruscans, +this misunderstanding gave rise to the account that Agylla +was taken by the Lydians. Agylla existed as a Tyrrhenian +town until a very late period. In the account of Herodotus, +where the Phocaeans settle in Corsica, and are attacked +and expelled by the Carthaginians and Agyllaeans, Agylla +does not yet appear as an Etruscan town. When the +Agyllaeans, after treating their captives treacherously, +had experienced the wrath of heaven, they consulted the +oracle of Apollo at Delphi, which no Etruscan town ever +did; they, moreover had a <i>thesaurus</i> at Delphi, and the +mention of <i>thesauri</i> there does not go farther back than +the fortieth Olympiad. It must therefore have been after +this time that the Etruscans advanced into those districts. +The names of Pyrgi and Alsium also attest their Tyrrhenian +origin. It is probable, lastly, that Caere, because of its +Tyrrhenian origin, was on such friendly terms with Rome, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_224">[224]</span>that during the Gallic calamity the Romans carried their +sacred treasures in safety to Caere. Afterwards they were +involved in a protracted war with each other; a truce was +concluded and renewed from time to time, until Caere +gradually entered the general relation in which the Etruscan +towns stood to Rome. In this condition, we find Caere in +the time of the Hannibalian war. Afterwards it is no +longer mentioned, except that we find it entered as a +Marian colony in the lists of colonies drawn up by Hyginus +and Frontinus.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Veii</span> was situated not quite ten English miles from Rome. +Its circumference, according to Dionysius, was like that of +Rome under Servius Tullius, and the same as the ancient Attic +ἄστυ. However, it is scarcely credible that Dionysius should +have possessed such accurate information about a town which +had been razed to the ground long before his own time. It +is well known, that Veii was destroyed by the Romans +even before the Gallic period, because the plebeians had +declared that they would emigrate to Veii, if the patricians +thought them unworthy of being members of the same +state. For this reason, the patricians and the senate systematically +destroyed the place. Its site is undoubted, but +scarcely any traces of Etruscan remains are found there. +In the reign of Tiberius, we find it mentioned as a military +colony, but we do not know when or how it was constituted +as such. About thirty years ago, excavations were +made on the spot, and some beautiful works of art, and +among them a very fine statue of Tiberius, were discovered; +but most of the things found there are not above mediocrity, +and all the inscriptions refer to the restoration of the +place by Tiberius. Henceforth, and down to the overthrow +of the western empire, Veii remained a small country +town in the neighbourhood of the capital. A bishop of +Veii occurs as late as the fifth century. It is quite in +accordance with the natural course of things, that places +which were great before Rome rose to eminence, and for +a time her equals, were in the end subdued and perished +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_225">[225]</span>in the wars with their rival. In places of this kind a new +population gradually sprang up, and corporations were +formed which were nothing else but military colonies, and +could not last long, as most of the men were unmarried. +Such a population was generally of the worst kind, consisting +of inn-keepers, carters, and the like; the places were +in reality suburbs of Rome, though at a considerable distance +from it.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Capena</span> was about the same distance from Rome as +Veii; it is mentioned in the earlier times, but afterwards +completely disappears, and its inhabitants, according to +all appearances, were removed to Rome after the Punic +war. <span class="smcap">Sutrium</span> and <span class="smcap">Nepet</span> were for a long time the +frontier towns of Etruria towards the territory of Rome.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Vulsinii</span>, situated on lake Bolsena, was one of the +largest Etruscan towns. When after the Gallic war we find +Etruria in arms, we must suppose that the Vulsinians were +the soul of those undertakings. They were involved in +hostilities with Rome even before the Gallic war; afterwards +they are, for a time, not mentioned at all, whence +their relations with Rome seem to have ceased; the frontier +heights between Rome and Etruria were allowed to grow +wild and to become covered with an impenetrable forest, as +has been the case in modern times in the neighbourhood of +Licca, on the frontier between Croatia and Turkish Bosnia. +This is the <i>Ciminian forest</i>, the description of which in Livy +is exaggerated in a ridiculous manner; it often happens +that his great imaginative power leads him to make descriptions +which would be excellent in a novel, but are ludicrous +in a work where truth is the object. The history of +Vulsinii is remarkable both for its facts and for its fables. +It is a fact that ever since <span class="allsmcap">A.U.</span> 440, and for a period of +thirty years, Vulsinii offered a resistance to the Romans, +which larger Etruscan towns recoiled from, and that at +length Rome, in the height of her power, when she was +the mistress of Italy, with difficulty conquered and then destroyed +it. In later times it re-appears, for Sejanus was a +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_226">[226]</span>native of Vulsinii. Metrodorus of Scepsis says that the +real cause of the destruction of Vulsinii was the circumstance +that the Romans wanted to obtain possession of 2000 +magnificent statues which existed there. This is a fable, +and no doubt the view of a Greek, which he attributed to +the Romans. The latter were far from attaching such +value to works of art; gold and silver were the things they +sought after. The real reason was that Vulsinii, by its +thirty years’ resistance, had distinguished itself above all +Etruscan tribes; and the Romans, therefore, were determined +to take the sap out of the tree, so as to prevent +its ever growing again. The ancient inhabitants had called +in the Romans against their slaves. These slaves, however, +must not be understood to have been domestic slaves, but +serfs, or the subdued ancient population, whom elsewhere +the Etruscan magnates kept in servitude, while the Vulsinians +had given them freedom and the franchise. The +commonalty, having thus become free, did not stop short +there, but, indignant at the ancient wrong done to them, +they attacked their former tyrants; they did not, however, +expel, but only weakened them. The latter then +applied to Rome, and preferred having their town destroyed +to living on a footing of equality with the commonalty. +The correct spelling of the name is <i>Vulsinii</i> +and not <i>Volsinii</i>, for, as I have already mentioned, the +Etruscans had no <i>o</i>; hence we find <i>Vulsinii</i> in the +Capitoline Fasti, though in genuine Roman words it +is more correct to write <i>o</i> after <i>v</i>, as <i>volnus</i> and not +<i>vulnus</i>.</p> + +<p>In the centre of Etruria there was no ruling city, nay, +no Etruscan place at all. Augustus established there <i>Sena +Julia</i> as a military colony, the sixth legion being stationed +there. As there was no road through the centre of the +country, but only one along the coast, and another through +the eastern part, Augustus made the one running by Aquapendente.</p> + +<p>The Etruscan towns in the eastern part of the country +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_227">[227]</span>were Clusium, Perusia, Cortona (though its Etruscan character +is doubtful), Arretium, and Faesulae.</p> + +<p>The greatness of <span class="smcap">Clusium</span> belongs to the most ancient +times, for in Roman history it is not of any importance; nor +do the Romans mention any ruins of Clusium, for all that +is related of the buildings of Porsena, belongs to the domain +of fable.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Perusia</span> was situated east of Clusium. During the +period described in the ninth and tenth books of Livy, +Perusia acts the same part as the other Etruscan towns; but +after having suffered a defeat, it concluded a truce. The +Perusines undertook the war in a foolish manner, and +the first reverse discouraged them. Here, too, a military +colony was afterwards established, probably by Sulla. The +town is remarkable in history for the obstinate resistance it +offered to Augustus, as in fact the descendants of Sulla’s +soldiers in the military colonies were almost everywhere +opposed to the party of Caesar. The town was taken and +the most illustrious citizens put to death, or rather butchered, +at the altar of Julius Caesar. Afterwards a new military +colony was sent thither under the name of <i>Colonia Julia +Augusta Perusina</i>.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Cortona</span>, also a military colony, probably likewise +founded by Sulla, was situated on a very high hill and in +a very strong position. Its ancient walls do not appear to +have been particularly strong.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Arretium</span> was more important than Cortona, and probably +one of the largest cities of Etruria. Its greatness may +be inferred from the fact that in the Hannibalian war it furnished +arms for 30,000 men of the army of Scipio. We must +not, however, conceive these towns to have been confined +to their own territories, but as sovereigns of districts of +many square miles, whence they were able to do things +which seem to us impossible. Arretium was an industrial +place, and rich by its manufactures, especially its potteries, +like Staffordshire in England; whence Augustus, in a fragment +of a letter to Maecenas, calls him a Tuscan potter. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_228">[228]</span>Augustus often tried to be witty, but his witticisms were +mostly dull. The pottery of Arretium was highly valued +even during the middle ages, though otherwise few collections +were made. At present such vessels are extremely rare: I +have brought with me from Italy a small piece as a relic, +for I am not rich enough to purchase an entire Arretine +vase. They are not painted, but have figures, leaves, +animals, and the like, in relief, and are of exquisite beauty. +Arretium completely shared the fate of Etruria itself. There +were three different Arretiums, <i>vetus</i>, <i>fidens</i> and <i>Julium</i>. +Sulla destroyed the city, sold its inhabitants as slaves, and +founded in the vicinity a new colony for his soldiers, under +the name of <i>Arretium fidens</i>. Augustus built <i>Arretium +Julium</i> in the neighbourhood of the two others. The +modern Arezzo occupies the site of Arretium Julium, +whence it contains no Etruscan antiquities; but the Roman +town was much more important than the present Arezzo. +If systematic excavations were made in the neighbourhood, +many things might certainly be discovered. I regret not +having visited the Grand Duke of Tuscany, an excellent +young man, full of taste for, and appreciation of, knowledge, +for I might perhaps have induced him to make +excavations, especially near Arezzo and Chiusi.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Faesulae</span> was situated on a hill above Florence. Florentine +traditions call it the metropolis of Florence, which +would accordingly be a colony of Faesulae; but a statement +in Machiavelli and others describes Florence as a colony of +Sulla, and this statement must have been derived from some +local chronicle. Faesulae was no doubt an ancient Etruscan +town, probably one of the twelve. It was taken in the war +of Sulla, and was then in the same desperate condition as +Arretium and Volaterrae, both of which were deprived by +Sulla of their freedom and territory. Hence a Sullanian +colony is mentioned by Cicero as existing there in the war +of Catiline. My conjecture is, that Sulla not only built +a strong fort on the top of the hill of Faesulae, but also +the new colony of Florentia below, and gave to it the <i>ager +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_229">[229]</span>Faesulanus</i>. If this be true, the statement before alluded +to would be correct, though we cannot trace it to any +authentic source. The Etruscans built their towns on inaccessible +hills in order to be able to control their subjects; +the Romans not being under this necessity, built their +towns in convenient and accessible places, to which they could +make roads. Faesulae could not be reached, except on foot +or on horseback; no vehicle could get up the hill, whereas +the Romans employed many vehicles in the intercourse +among the towns. But although Florentia was a colony of +Sulla, the <i>agrimensores</i> subsequently describe it as a colony +of the triumvirs, and it is indeed possible that not one of +the twenty-eight military colonies of Sulla may have been +kept up until the time of the triumvirs. This subject is in +the greatest confusion, and no one has yet attempted to +clear it up. First we have the colonies of the republic, +then the military colonies of Sulla, then again a second +series of military colonies under Caesar, and lastly those of +the triumvirs and Augustus. The earlier colonies lost their +character through the Lex Julia, and became municipia; +then followed the Sullanian and Julian colonies, so that the +same place at three different times may have had three +different colonies. This view of the matter makes clear +that which Cluver and Cellarius, with all their merits, have +left in utter confusion.</p> + +<p>Within the territory of Tuscia or Etruria, we find on +the banks of the Tiber a place, or rather a tribe, which in +all our maps is described as a part of Etruria, but +which the ancients, Strabo, e.g., expressly say did not +belong to Etruria. This is the people of the <span class="smcap">Faliscans</span>. +Respecting their nationality, the ancients have in reality +only this negative statement, and we cannot ascertain to +what race they belonged, except by divination and indirect +evidence. Virgil in his Aeneid speaks of <i>Aequi Falisci</i>, which +the commentators, and even the ancient scholiasts, taking +<i>Aequi</i> as an adjective, translate “just Faliscans”; but it is +highly probable that <i>Aequi</i> is a name, and that we have to +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_230">[230]</span>regard the expression in the same light as, e.g., <i>Chaonii +Campi</i>, where Campi is explained even by the scholiasts +as the name of a people. The identity of the Aequians +and Faliscans is confirmed also by other evidence. Among +the Faliscans we find the word <i>hirpus</i>, whence their language +may be inferred to be a branch of the Oscan, in which, +as we have seen, this word signifies a wolf. Lastly, the +name of the Faliscans may be traced at once to that of the +Volscians, <i>Volsci</i>, <i>Volisci</i>, <i>Falisci</i>; and as we know that +they were of foreign, that is, non-Etruscan origin, we +cannot, considering the geographical position of the people, +doubt the correctness of the view here expounded. There +is some plausibility also in the other tradition which is +traced to Cato, that the country, before it was taken possession +of by the Faliscans, was inhabited by Siculians. This +quite agrees with our supposition of successive conquests. +The most ancient inhabitants were Pelasgians, who were +succeeded by an Ausonian people, and the latter again are +pushed onward by the Sabines; for it should be observed, +that the Sabines did not penetrate between these Faliscans +and Aequians and the Volscians until a later period.</p> + +<p>The Faliscans had several towns, of which <span class="smcap">Falerii</span> was +the most important. For reasons which are quite unknown +to us, the Romans, after the first Punic war, conquered and +destroyed this town. This fact is all we know; but we +may suppose that the place, to escape from oppression, was +tempted to a rash and inconsiderate act, for the condition +of Italy was then such as to render any undertaking against +Rome hopeless. The town was afterwards restored. Near +Civita Castellana, there is a place called Falera, which is no +doubt the ancient Falerii; Faliscan inscriptions are still +found there. It was a deeply rooted mistake among the +first scholars after the revival of letters, to suppose that +Civita Castellana was the ancient Veii; but this error was +refuted even by Lucas Holstenius. The real town of Falerii +was situated a little to the east of it.</p> + +<p>Mount <span class="smcap">Soracte</span>, which is always visible from Rome, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_231">[231]</span>was in the country of the Faliscans. Horace, in one of his +Odes, speaks of Soracte as being covered with snow, and +this has given rise to the erroneous inference, that the +climate of Rome is now changed and milder than in antiquity. +The Abruzzi, Leonessa, and other heights, may +be covered with snow, without its being cold at Rome, +but when there is snow on mount Soracte the cold at Rome +is severe. This is indeed not often the case; but when +it does happen, the snow-capped Soracte, is seen very +distinctly from Rome. Horace has not availed himself +of a poetical license in this respect. I mention this, +because people, very frequently, if not generally, speak of +poetical license as if an inaccurate expression in a poet +ought to be pardoned. There may, indeed, be poets of this +kind, as, for example, Ausonius, and Greek poets of the +period of decay; and modern poets, too, very frequently +make use of such licenses; but it is quite certain that the +good poets of antiquity give to things only such epithets as +are quite clear and true to their own minds.</p> + +<h3 id="Umbria"><span class="smcap">Umbria.</span></h3> + +<p>Of this country I have little to say. Umbria, in its proper +sense, in which the name is used by the Romans, is situated +for the most part in the Apennines, though we cannot even +positively assert that it extended to the southern slope of the +Apennines. But in more ancient times it extended much +farther on both sides. There is great probability in the +tradition that the Umbrians were confined to their small +territory by the Etruscans, who are said to have taken +300 Umbrian towns. This number, however, must not be +taken literally, for it is only a general number like μυρίοι, +and <i>sexcenti</i>. Its earlier and larger extent is also attested +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_232">[232]</span>by the river Umbro in the territory of Siena, and by the +fact, that even at a later time a part of Etruria continued +to be called Umbria. At one period the Umbrians also +possessed the whole country about Rimini as far as the +mouth of the Padus; there they were either expelled or +subdued by the Gauls, or, as is still more probable, completely +extirpated, for the Gauls were most fearful enemies +and barbarians in the strictest sense of the term, annihilating +and devastating everything that came in their +way. During the Roman period, the Umbrians were extremely +weak, and down to the fifth century, when the +Romans came in contact with them, they were no doubt +tributary to the Gauls. What could they in fact have done +against such an enemy? They were obliged either to repel +them or pay tribute to them. We know that other neighbouring +tribes did so, whence it is probable that the Umbrians +did the same. The Gauls, who so often advanced +to the lower Tiber, cannot have come through any other +country but Umbria, for the Etruscans in their towns +defended themselves against them, and were protected in +the north by the Apennines. Hence the unfortunate country +of Umbria had constantly to suffer from the passages +of the Gauls, who, in like manner, always took their road +to Apulia through Picenum.</p> + +<p>At the time when the Umbrians come in contact with +the Romans, they seem to act as one nation, though it +does not follow from this that they actually formed one +state. A fact, however, which may seem to support this +view is, that the different districts of the country are mentioned +under the name of <i>tribus</i> or <i>plagae</i> (<i>tribus Materina</i>, +<i>Sapinia</i>), which denote parts of one great whole. Yet +this union, if it did exist, can have embraced only a portion, +for the Sarsinates, or Sassinates, stood apart, and in +the war of Pyrrhus they alone, for a time, defended their +independence against the Romans. The Umbrians allowed +themselves to become involved in the war of the Samnites +and Gauls, but appear to have carried it on without energy; +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_233">[233]</span>and a treaty seems to have been concluded with them +similar to that with the Etruscans, for both are mentioned +among the nations which supported Scipio. I am well +aware that Italicans did the same, but they did it in a +different manner.</p> + +<p>Several of the Umbrian towns were made Roman colonies, +especially <i>Spoletium</i> and <i>Narnia</i>, previously called <i>Nequinum</i>; +both places were fortified by the Romans (Narnia after +the second Samnite war, and Spoletium afterwards), for the +purpose of keeping the country in subjection, and of protecting +the frontier against the Gauls.</p> + +<p>All Umbria was full of towns: <i>Hispellum</i>, <i>Tuder</i>, <i>Fulginium</i>, +<i>Assisium</i>, <i>Camerinum</i>, and <i>Iguvium</i> (Gubbio), were +places of considerable importance. In the last of them, +tables have been dug out of the ground with inscriptions +in Etruscan and in another language in Latin +characters; the latter language seems to resemble the +Latin and Oscan. When once the Oscan language shall be +better known, more light will perhaps be thrown upon the +Umbrian language also. The name <i>Umbria</i> and the Greek +Ὀμβρικοὶ seem actually to be akin to Ὀπικοί, which is in +fact intimated in a passage of Philistus; whence the Umbrians +probably belonged to the great Ausonian race. So +far as I have seen Umbria, it is a very excellent and +picturesque country; the Apennines are there much more +beautiful than in Tuscany; they are covered with particularly +fine forests, and have magnificent, rich, and +fertile valleys. All the rest of Italy is ill-suited to the +breeding of oxen, but Umbria has the most splendid kinds: +I have seen a herd of white oxen near the well of Clitumnus, +which consisted of the finest and noblest animals +of the kind; they were like those in southern Poland and +Russia. The cattle here in Germany is wretched. The +extension and change of the races of animals in Italy may +be traced back to the times of antiquity: buffaloes, for +example, were introduced into Campania in the seventh +century, when the country was almost a wilderness.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_234">[234]</span></p> + +<h3 id="Gallia_Cisalpina_or_Togata"><span class="smcap">Gallia Cisalpina or Togata.</span></h3> + +<p>Down to the middle of the fourth century, the country +beyond the Apennines was called northern Etruria, but +after that time it bore the name <i>Gallia Cisalpina</i> or <i>Togata</i>, +but it extended further than Etruria proper, for the sea-coast +as far as the river Aesis never belonged to Etruria.</p> + +<p>The country now called Lombardy in its narrower sense, +was inhabited in the earliest times by Ligurians, as is clear +from most indubitable indications, and hence we must +suppose, that subsequently they were driven by the Etruscans +across the Ticinus. But these events belong to too +remote an epoch, and I cannot say much either of this or of +the Etruscan period. Certain it is that Etruscan towns +existed in those parts, and that Etruscans dwelt there as the +conquerors of the Ligurians and as the lords of the land; and +there can be no doubt that after descending from the Alps the +Etruscans established their first settlements there. <i>Melpum</i> is +said to have been a great Etruscan settlement in the neighbourhood +of Milan; and <i>Felsina</i> (Bononia), <i>Mutina</i>, <i>Parma</i>, +and <i>Brixia</i>, are spoken of in the same way. <i>Verona</i> is +sometimes called Raetian and sometimes Etruscan, and +<i>Mantua</i> is called Etruscan by Virgil. It is possible that +Verona may have been termed Raetian because it was +situated on the Raetian frontier, and may for all this have +been an Etruscan town.</p> + +<p>The immigration of the Gauls into those parts is assigned +by Livy in a most unhistorical manner to the time of Tarquinius +Priscus; he has no other reason for it than the very +legendary connection supposed to have existed between +this emigration of the Gauls, and the settlement of the +Phocaeans at Massilia. There is much more probability +in the statement, that not long before the attack upon Rome +by the Senones, the Gauls had first poured down upon +all Italy in great masses. This is supported by the express +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_235">[235]</span>testimony of Polybius, that they had shortly before come +across the Alps, and also by the tradition that they took Melpum +in the same year in which Veii was taken by Camillus +(358). Just at that time, the Etruscans on quitting Veii +seem to have turned their attention to an object of greater +interest in a different direction. About that same time +the Gauls appear in Slavonia and Lower Hungary, where +they stirred up the Triballians, and according to an ancient +tradition the Gauls migrated at the same time across the +Alps and across the Rhine. They evidently marched into +Italy through Switzerland, which may previously have +been inhabited by quite different tribes. The ruins on the +Ottilienberg in Alsace have a complete Etruscan appearance; +they strongly resemble the fortifications of Volaterrae, +and are situated on the plateau of a hill: they are altogether +foreign to the Celtic character; the Celts had nothing +of the kind. The supposition of the antiquarians of Alsace, +ever since the time of Schoepflin, that, as those ruins are +not Celtic, they belong to the decaying period of Rome, +perhaps the reign of Valentinian, is extremely unfortunate. +These ruins are far more ancient than the Celtic period, +and belong to a people, which was expelled by the Gauls. +The great Gallic migration was a mighty commotion extending +from the frontiers of Spain to the Ukraine. In the +subsequent counter-movement of the Slavonic migrations, +the Gauls were driven back from east to west; and then +they appear under the name of Cimbri together with the +Germanic nation of the Teutones, and return to their +ancient homes as ravaging conquerors.</p> + +<p>The Gauls who settled south of the Alps consisted of +several tribes, partly entire and partly ἀποδασμοὶ of those +of which a portion remained behind in Gaul. In this +light we must view the <i>Boians</i>; very few of them may have +remained in Gaul itself; the greater part advanced into the +country south of the Po, and another branch settled in +Bavaria and Bohemia. On the whole there were about four +or five Gallic tribes which settled in Italy on both sides of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_236">[236]</span>the Po; but besides them large numbers of volunteers, individuals +and roaming vagabonds joined and strengthened +one tribe or the other. I shall enumerate them in the order +in which we find them established, beginning in the west. +The Ticinus forms the frontier between the Gauls and +Ligurians, as it still forms that between the territories of +Milan and Piedmont.</p> + +<p>1. The <span class="smcap">Insubrians</span>, in the modern territory of Milan +proper.</p> + +<p>2. The <span class="smcap">Cenomanians</span>, in the territory of Brescia and +Bergamo, between lake Garda and the mouth of the Po.</p> + +<p>3. The <span class="smcap">Boians</span>, in the south of the latter; their territory +is made too small in all our maps; they occupied the county +from Piacenza to the sea, including Parma, Modena, Reggio, +Bologna and Ferrara. They were divided, according to +Cato, into 112 pagi.</p> + +<p>4. The <span class="smcap">Senones</span>, in the modern Romagna and Urbino, as +far as the Aesis and the frontiers of Picenum.</p> + +<p>5. The <span class="smcap">Lingones</span> must have occupied the country to +the north of the former, that is Ferrara and the territory of +Rovigo.</p> + +<p>In the later political geography of the Romans, Gallia +Cisalpina is divided into two parts which are very different +from each other, viz., <i>Gallia Cispadana</i> and <i>Gallia Transpadana</i>. +In political terminology the latter acquired a +greater extent, not being limited to the country between +the Ticinus and lake Garda, but also comprising Venetia. +The inhabitants of all this country, who received the <i>jus +Latii</i>, were called <i>Transpadani</i>. The <i>Cispadani</i> are not much +spoken of, which arose from particular circumstances, which +I will explain to you because history does not do it. I +have mentioned to you, that the whole country south of the +Po, from Piacenza to the frontier of Picenum, was inhabited +by two Gallic tribes, the Boians and Senones. The +Senones were extirpated to a man, as, e.g., the Eretrians +were extirpated by the Persians. The Romans invaded +their country, burnt down their villages, and carried off +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_237">[237]</span>their women and children into slavery; the men, capable +of bearing arms, who in their despair returned, like beasts +of prey whose young ones are taken from them, to save +their families, were completely defeated, and those who +escaped fled to the Boians. The whole of modern Romagna +became a complete desert, such as we sometimes find in the +history of Germany, e.g., the desert of the Avars in the +time of Charlemagne, and Servia, after its devastation by +Attila, when it was in such a condition that the ambassadors +of Theodosius II. travelled seven days without finding any +other traces of man, except the bodies of the murdered inhabitants. +After its devastation, the Romans gave up the country +partly to Roman citizens and partly to Italicans, who might +cultivate it as they pleased, for it had become <i>ager publicus</i>. +C. Flaminius afterwards distributed a portion of it <i>viritim</i> +among Roman citizens. There now arose in those extensive +districts entirety new settlements, the names of which are +of a peculiar character: <i>Faventia Pollentia</i>, <i>Florentia</i> and +<i>Placentia</i> are all names derived from verbs implying a +favourable omen. Other places are termed <i>Fora</i>, and according +to the American practice they might be called territories; +they were inhabited by Roman citizens, who fully enjoyed +the benefits of the Roman law, but did not form corporations. +They lived isolated from one another, and thus +were deprived of that advantage which was so important in +antiquity, I mean, of the privileges of corporations: they +had no magistrates to administer justice, whence there were +many acts which they could not perform at all. It was +contrary to the feelings of the Romans to appoint magistrates +according to districts, and it was for this reason that +they instituted Fora, places in which court-houses were +built, and where a praefect, appointed by the praetor +urbanus, resided, and where, accordingly, judicial business +could be transacted.</p> + +<p>The Boians survived the Senones about ninety years; during +the Hannibalian war, they were enraged against the Romans, +who, by fortifying and colonising Placentia and Cremona, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_238">[238]</span>had planted the yoke upon their necks, but the vengeance +of the Romans was such, that in the course of about ten +years they extirpated the whole Boian nation. A fragment +of Cato in Pliny (iii. 15) furnishes express testimony on +this subject, and the account in Livy, too, speaks distinctly +enough. After this, no Boians are mentioned in Italy. In +treating of Roman history, and especially of the <i>Lex de +Gallia Cisalpina</i>, the question often presents itself to us, +how it happens that in Cicero’s time we hear such frequent +mention of Gallia Transpadana, while Gallia Cispadana is +never spoken of. The matter is explained by what I have said. +The Gallic population of the latter was utterly annihilated; +in regard to the Senones, it is expressly attested, and the survivors +of the Boians were not more numerous than, for example, +those of the Indian tribes in America. The whole +country then was taken possession of by Romans and +Italicans in the manner before described, and several colonies, +such as Mutina, Bononia, Parma, etc., were established +in it; the country, however, was partly <i>ager publicus</i> and +partly <i>ager divisus</i>. In this manner, the whole country south +of the Po was severed from Gaul, and all that remained of +Gaul consisted of a small territory north of the Po, between +the Ticinus and the lake of Garda; and this latter is the +country of the Insubrians and Cenomanians, who, together +with the Venetians, formed those Transpadani, who, +through Cn. Pompeius Strabo, obtained the <i>jus Latii</i> of the +later kind.</p> + +<p>The following are the towns in the territory of Gallia +Cispadana, proceeding from west to east:—<span class="smcap">Placentia</span>, +the first Roman colony in those districts, was established +two years before Hannibal’s passage over the Alps. Like +Cremona, it was situated on the northern bank of the river, +and its fortification was one of the most energetic measures +for maintaining the Roman dominion in those parts.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Parma</span>, a Latin colony, was founded like <span class="smcap">Mutina</span> after +the Hannibalian war.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Bononia</span>, anciently called Felsina, and at present Bologna, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_239">[239]</span>was a remarkable place even in antiquity on account of its +favourable situation, though it can in no way be compared +with what it was during its subsequent greatness. We may +estimate its ancient circumference with tolerable accuracy +from the extent of the town in the middle ages, which, however, +was scarcely the fifth part of what it is at present.</p> + +<p>In the subsequent province of Flaminia, which ever since +the time of the exarchate was called <i>Romania</i> (Romagna), +there existed several towns between Bologna and Rimini, +such as <i>Faventia</i>, <i>Forum Cornelii</i>, <i>Forum Popillii</i>, and others. +Most of them were as ancient as the time of the Roman +republic, but their history is unimportant. Ever since the +beginning of the exarchate, their sad celebrity is that their +defence and conquest are much spoken of.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Ravenna</span>, the centre of the whole province of Flaminia, +was originally a Pelasgian town, and is called Thessalian. +In ancient times, it was situated, like Venice, in a lagoon, +an arm of the sea extending from the mouth of the Po to +the south of Rimini. Ravenna was built there on stakes +like Venice. Such continued to be its condition in the +time of the Roman emperors. It was inaccessible from the +main land, from which it was separated by that arm of the +sea, or rather by so shallow a marsh that persons could +reach the city only with very flat boats, and not without a +very accurate knowledge of the shallows. This strong +position was probably the reason why Ravenna subsequently +became the seat of the imperial government, for no place +in Italy was considered sufficiently strong even when protected +by a courageous garrison. Ravenna at that time +was situated in the midst of the sea, and the streets were +formed, as at Venice, by means of canals, by which the +communication between its various parts was mainly kept +up. A suburb of the name of <i>Classes</i> was situated on the +main land opposite. The lagoons have gradually been +filled up. During the Pelasgian period, the arm of the +sea may have been deep, but in the middle ages it was +filled up. A pier was constructed between Ravenna and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_240">[240]</span>the suburb Classes (near it was the military port, whence +the name Classes), and this pier seems to have greatly +contributed to the filling up of the lagoons. When +Belisarius made war on the Goths, Ravenna was still +situated on the sea, but during the middle ages the sea +vanishes, and the history of this gradual change can be +accurately traced in documents. At present Ravenna is not +only not a maritime town, and without a trace of its ancient +canals, but it is situated, like Mexico, at a distance of from +one and a half to two Roman miles from the sea, and near +Classes not a trace of a harbour is left. Ravenna’s greatness +belongs to the period of Rome’s decay. As early as +the time of Augustus, a fleet was stationed there for the +purpose of enabling the Romans, in case of a war or an +insurrection, speedily to convey troops to the frontiers of +Noricum, and to Pannonia; and afterwards a fleet was +always ready there. In the time of Theodosius and +Honorius, the town became important as the seat of government; +under the Goths, too, it was the capital notwithstanding +the unpleasantness of its situation; during the +period of the Lombards it was the seat of the exarch or +Greek governor of Italy. Hence the many extremely +remarkable buildings, which still distinguish Ravenna from +all other towns, and there is no place possessing so many +edifices erected at a time when otherwise very little was +done in the way of building. At the time when Ravenna +became a capital, it had probably not yet reached its full +extent; and as its population greatly increased, it was +necessary to enlarge and embellish the place. Its decay +began when it ceased to be the seat of the exarch. The +town is remarkable also in the history of the Roman law, +for notwithstanding its conquest by the Lombards, it never +assumed the character of a Germanic town. Hence it +became the seat of the grammatical and juristical schools, in +which ancient literature continued to be taught. The +form in which the ancient scholiasts have come down to us +seems generally, speaking, to have been given to them in +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_241">[241]</span>the school at Ravenna. Savigny has shown that the Roman +law was taught there until the eleventh century, and that +its juristical school was not transferred to Bologna till the +time when the Roman law became established beyond the +frontiers of Italy.</p> + +<p>The ancient town of <span class="smcap">Ariminum</span> (Rimini) is situated to +the south-east of Ravenna; it was a Latin colony established +about the end of the fifth century as a frontier fortress +and a place of arms to protect the Romans against the +Cisalpine Gauls. The town is frequently mentioned in +history, especially during the Hannibalian and Gallic wars. +The Romans there awaited the invasion of the Gauls, +the Apennines being impassable. A friend once told me +that he had always pronounced the name Arimīnum, until +many years ago his attention was directed to a passage of +Lucan, which shewed him that it ought to be pronounced +Arimĭnum. Lucan is sometimes useful in teaching us +the correct pronunciation of names of places, which do +not elsewhere occur in poetry. Otherwise he is, on the +whole, not a pleasing writer, though in some points he +contains valuable information, but he is not sufficiently +polished. It was through his poem, that the gap in the +second book of Caesar’s “Bellum Civile” was discovered. +But the most useless of all writers is Silius Italicus, and +yet some things may be gleaned even from his works; no +ancient author, in fact, is so bad, as not to furnish us with +some useful information.</p> + +<p>Further south on the coast, we find the towns of <i>Pisaurum</i>, +<i>Fanum</i>, and <i>Sena Gallia</i>, of which scarcely any thing +is to be said.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Gallia Transpadana.</span> The <span class="smcap">Insubrians</span> occupied +almost exactly the modern territory of Milan, for Ticinum +was regarded as one of the Ligurian towns. Comum +also did not belong to Gallia Transpadana, which +comprised Milan, Lodi, and a part of the territory of +Cremona. During the 200 years in which the Gauls +were masters of that district, it contained, properly speaking, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_242">[242]</span>no towns, and <span class="smcap">Mediolanum</span>, the principal place of the +Insubrians, was an open village, though it may have +been very large. The Romans treated the Insubrians more +gently than the Boians, whence their country was not so +cruelly devastated. In consequence of its relation to Rome, +the village of Mediolanum became a town; but when or +how this happened, we have no means of ascertaining. In +the time of Caesar and Cicero, Mediolanum is already +mentioned as a town, and, according to the description of +Strabo, it appears to have even been a considerable one. +The district of Milan is extremely fertile; its vicissitudes +have been terrible, but it has always been restored, the +causes of which must probably be sought in the particularly +favorable circumstances of its situation. It is certainly not +owing to the peculiar character of its inhabitants, of whom +antiquity did not entertain any more favorable opinion than +that which is current about the modern Milanese, who are +said to be the most lazy and awkward among all the Italians. +The atmosphere is heavy, and both ancients and moderns +assert, that this has a great influence upon the inhabitants. +Now this town of Milan which in the time of Strabo +appears as a considerable country town, ever continued to +increase under the emperors. In the letters of Pliny we +find it spoken of as a large place, in which, according to +the custom of the time, public teachers of rhetoric and +grammar were appointed and salaried, and formed what we +might call a university. During the second century Milan +became larger and larger. In the war of the emperor Aurelian +with the Goths, it was devastated, but soon recovered +again. The emperor Maximian took up his residence there, +so that it became a capital of the empire. Ausonius who +lived about eighty years later says, <i>Mediolani mira omnia</i>, +and <i>mirus</i> at that time signified “beautiful” or “magnificent.” +In the reign of Theodoric it was a very large and +important city, though this emperor did not reside there. +In the war of Belisarius its fate was very melancholy: +Datius, the bishop of Milan, had been intriguing with the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_243">[243]</span>imperial general and promised to deliver up Milan to him; +but the plan was betrayed, the Goths entered Milan, and, +if we can take the account in Procopius literally, put the +whole population to the sword. The calamity must indeed +have been fearful, though it can scarcely have been as bad +as it is said to have been. In the time of the Lombards +we again find it as a great city, though it was under a disadvantage +because Pavia, in its neighbourhood, was the +capital of the Lombards; and a rivalry between those two +cities continued to exist until a late period of the middle +ages. This kind of hostility was quite common among the +Italian towns. In the case of large cities, this feeling +may to some extent be excused, though it cannot be +justified; but at present, when those towns are altogether +devoid of character, that hatred is the only thing which +has been propagated to them from better and more glorious +times. Verona was the first Italian town in which I made +a stay, and in which I had any conversation with the people; +they very soon began to speak contemptuously of +the other cities, to each of which some abusive name was +applied. Such were the first things I heard in Italy; the +idea that they are all countrymen and Italians is treated +by them with ridicule; and even the inhabitants of different +towns under the same sovereign have no fellow-feeling. +When you speak to a Milanese, you find that he does not +regard the Veronese as his countrymen; the inhabitants of +some districts in Tuscany appear to him much more in that +light, and he feels as foreign to the Lombards as to the +French. It is distressing to see this distracted state of Italy. +A Florentine treats it as a heresy and flies into a passion, +when you speak to him of a <i>favella Italiana</i>, he cannot +hear of anything but a <i>favella Toscana</i>. It is well known, +that the emperor Frederic Barbarossa afterwards destroyed +Milan, and compelled the inhabitants to live in five scattered +villages; but they returned nevertheless. Subsequently, +the wars at the end of the fifteenth and the beginning of +the sixteenth century brought such severe sufferings upon +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_244">[244]</span>Milan, that it would necessarily have perished, if this were +possible. It fell into the hands of the Spaniards, and in +the sixteenth century was visited by a plague which carried +off three-fifths of its inhabitants. In the seventeenth century, +the plague again made sad ravages, and destroyed +half the population. At present, it is still constantly +increasing. He who has a taste for classical antiquity +cannot regard these Lombard towns as belonging to it; +for their importance does not commence until the decline +of the Romans.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Comum</span> was situated at a distance of about twenty miles +from Milan; it was a town of Alpine tribes of the Raetian +race, and not Gallic. The modern Como is not the same +as the ancient Comum, but is identical with the <i>Novocomum</i> +of ancient geography which was founded and +honored with privileges at a later period by Cn. Pompeius +Strabo and Julius Caesar.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Bergamum</span> also was not a Gallic town, but belonged to +the mountain tribes of the district. Brixia, like the whole +district between Lodi and Mantua belonged to the Cenomani.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Laus Pompeia</span>, now Lodi, was founded by Cn. Pompeius +Strabo, not, however, as a Roman town, but “as a +colony in a place already existing” in the Roman dominion.⁠<a id="FNanchor_59" href="#Footnote_59" class="fnanchor">[59]</a>⁠</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Brixia</span> is called a Cenomanian town, but it must not be +inferred from this that the Cenomani occupied the whole +territory of Brixia, for the whole valley of the Camuni was +Raetian. The conquering Gauls did not dwell in the +mountains, but in the plains fitted for the breeding of +cattle and their rude agriculture. If we draw a line from +lake Garda to Brixia, and thence northward towards the +Adda, so as to separate Bergamum from the country of the +Gauls, all the country north of that line did not belong to +Italy before the time of Augustus, not even in its wider +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_245">[245]</span>sense, but to the Alpine tribes. Catullus says of Brescia +<i>Veronae mater amata meae</i>, which is unaccountable, for +Verona was a small Gallic town. It is possible that Brixia +may have been the seat of a conventus, somewhat in the +same relation in which the metropolis in Asia Minor stood +to the other towns; this is probable enough, or else +Catullus alludes to the ancient Etruscan times, in which +case Brixia would be the mother city of Verona.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Mantua</span>, according to Virgil (<i>Tusco de sanguine vires</i>) a +Tuscan town; the manner in which he speaks of it, shows +that it was a town with a territory, which was divided +into twelve districts. Although he describes it as a considerable +town, it does not appear in this light, and we +must probably make some allowance for the poet’s partiality +for his native city. Its territory, however, may have +been extensive, as is evident from the fact that it was contiguous +to that of Cremona.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Verona</span>, to the north of Mantua, is remarkable +because for a considerable period it was the seat of the +Lombard kings, as before it had been the residence of +Theodoric, who in the German lays is called Dietrich of +Bern. There can be no doubt that the name of this far-famed +chivalrous town was transferred to Berne in Switzerland, +which was built by duke Berthold of Zähringen. Its +ancient circumference may still be recognised, and from +it we see how small those towns in the north of Italy +were during the imperial period, in comparison with what +they were in the middle ages. The whole of Lombardy, +Tuscany, and Venice were far more flourishing in the middle +ages than at any period in classical antiquity. If we +compare Italy during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries +with what it was in the days of Cicero, it is as a garden +compared with a desert. The ancient town of Verona occupied +scarcely one-fourth of the extent which it had in the +time of the princes of Della Scalla; it still has the same +circumference, but is desolate notwithstanding its 60,000 +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_246">[246]</span>inhabitants. However, that Verona was a great and wealthy +town even in antiquity, may be seen from the splendid +gate of the emperor Gallienus (which also shews that +it was a Roman colony), and from the splendid amphitheatre. +Its fate has not been so disastrous as that of Milan; +for throughout the middle ages it was not visited by a +single great calamity. It is singular to observe how some +towns are ever visited by misfortunes, while others are +spared. Verona has acquired immortal celebrity from being +the birth-place of Catullus, who and Lucretius are unquestionably +the greatest Roman poets. The name C. Valerius +is surprising, and people have been foolish enough to connect +it with the ancient Valerian gens; but the fact is, +that in the seventh century the Veronese must have had +some Valerius for their patron. The name is extremely +common on the stones which are dug out in the neighbourhood +of Verona, and I have seen the name Valerius with +different cognomina on at least twelve or fifteen of them. +In antiquity the town was situated on a reach of the Athesis +(Adige), but it now occupies both sides of the river.</p> + +<p>In the division made by Augustus, Verona was contained +in the Regio Veneta, but it is only in an improper sense +that it can be said to have belonged to the nation of the +<span class="smcap">Veneti</span>. No ancient writer distinctly states to what race +the Veneti belonged. They are said to have resembled +the Illyrians in dress and manners; but the very way in +which this statement is made, shows that its author did not +regard them as Illyrians. Polybius assuredly knew how +to distinguish the Illyrian language, as well as people in +northern Germany can distinguish the Slavonian language +without having themselves any knowledge of it. I have +no doubt that the Veneti belonged to the race of the Liburnians, +and that accordingly they were a branch of the +wide-spread Tyrrheno-Pelasgians, in consequence of which +they also became so easily Latinized. Patavium not only +had its own Trojan legends, but it was by no means a +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_247">[247]</span>barbarous town like those of Dalmatia; it must have had +a different origin, otherwise it could not have produced the +most eloquent of Latin historians.</p> + +<p>Within the territory of Venetia, we meet with a people +called <span class="smcap">Euganei</span>, who seem to have been regarded as the +more ancient inhabitants, among whom, according to tradition, +the Trojans established themselves. Two things +must be distinguished in the legend of Antenor, though it +cannot claim to be historically true. First, the Patavinians +regarded Antenor as their κτίστης, just as the Latin towns +looked upon Aeneas as the leader of a Trojan colony. +Secondly, the fact of Antenor being described as a leader +of the Heneti, is a mere play upon words originating in the +resemblance of the names. In Venetia assuredly nothing +was known about the Heneti, a people in Paphlagonia. +But, however this may be,—</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Patavium</span> was a very ancient and large town, and it is +strange that it appears as such in Roman history all at +once. It is mentioned as early as the fifth century, during +the expedition of the Spartan Cleonymus; it is also spoken +of at the time of Caesar and of the triumvirs. But Strabo +is the first who describes Patavium as a large town, and in +such a manner as to make it evident that it was an ancient +place. He says that, next to Rome, it was the wealthiest +city of Italy, that Patavium alone had 500 Roman equites, +each of whom, as is well-known, must have possessed at +least 100,000 denarii: this gives us some idea of the +enormous amount of local wealth. In the time of Augustus, +it was a large commercial and manufacturing place; the +whole district is in fact very industrial, and its colony, +Venice, besides its commerce, is also celebrated for its great +industry. Patavium is always said to have been destroyed +by Attila: when he advanced as far as the Po, a number +of inhabitants of Patavium and other towns are said to have +taken refuge in the islands of the Venetian lagoons, and to +have protected themselves there. I do indeed believe, that +the tempest of the Huns passed over all those towns, and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_248">[248]</span>that the destruction was fearful; but I cannot believe that +Padua perished. It never ceased to be a town, and was an +important place during the Gothic and Lombard periods, +and throughout the middle ages.</p> + +<p>Nor can the foundation of the new city in the lagoons +(Venice) have been occasioned by that sudden invasion of +the Huns; the place must have been inhabited to some +extent even before. This lay in the nature of circumstances. +Sailors, and other people of the same kind, sought +refuge in a place where they were beyond the reach of the +barbarians. They went there not only on account of the +Huns, but of all barbarian immigrants, for there they were +safe against ill-treatment and other horrors, and land was +not the thing they wanted. When Theodoric reigned in +Italy, they were his faithful subjects; and they were afterwards +under the dominion of the Eastern empire. The discussions +which were in vogue during the seventeenth +century, as to whether Venice could trace its liberties to +the Roman times, were silly and quite useless. There are +what are called Fasti of the Venetian consuls, but they are +altogether apocryphal, a forgery of the Lombard period; +they contain only late Lombard names, and do not appear +to be authentic until the middle of the seventh century.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Aquileia</span>, the extreme town of Italy, was a Roman +colony planted for the purpose of securing Venetia, of +offering resistance to the Noricans and extending the Roman +dominion against them, of protecting the Roman supremacy +in the Adriatic, and of keeping up the communication by +land with Istria. The town, favoured by its situation, +gradually increased, and became an emporium for the commerce +with the northern countries, no doubt, even with the +interior of Germany, to which the products of the south, +wine, oil, and the like were exported. It cannot be said +with certainty whether Aquileia was also a military colony. +Under the emperors, it was one of the largest cities, and was +carefully fortified as a place of arms for all Italy against the +northern nations and the Getae.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_249">[249]</span></p> + +<p>Italy extended in the north as far as Istria; but a part of +Istria, as far as Pola, was united in the division of Augustus +with Italy; this was founded upon the correct view that, +according to the course of the mountains, the frontier was +formed by the highest ridge of the Julian Alps and their +whole continuation down to the southern point of Istria. +In this manner Istria was divided into two parts.</p> + +<h3 id="Liguria"><span class="smcap">Liguria.</span></h3> + +<p>The part of the continent of Italy which remains to +be considered, was probably not regarded by Polybius as +belonging to Italy, or at least only partially. Liguria, in +the widest sense, extended as far as Gaul, nay, as far as +the frontier of Spain; but Italian Liguria, in the sense in +which Augustus made it a part of Italy (not in the later +sense in which it signified the territory of Milan), comprised +the Genoese Alps, the continuation of the Alps forming +the southernmost part of Piedmont, and the hilly country +about Turin, with Alessandria, and a part of the territory +of Montferrat. The Genoese Alps, that is, the range of the +Alpes Maritimae as far as Briançon and mount Cenis, are +among the highest and wildest parts of the Alps, while the +more northern slopes of the mountains as far as the Po and +the Ticinus belong to the most splendid and fertile parts of +northern Italy. It is not a plain, like the territory of Milan +and the country on the lower Po, which is evidently, like +Egypt, an ancient bay of the sea, filled up in the course of +time; but it is a hilly country. Its population in ancient +times was altogether Ligurian, and the Salassi, in the valley +of Aosta, are the only tribe, mentioned in after times, +regarding which it is uncertain whether they were Ligurians +or Celts; the Taurini were, in my opinion, Ligurians. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_250">[250]</span>Although the language is changed in modern times, still the +fact of French being spoken by the inhabitants of the valley +of Aosta, and not Italian, is of some significance in connection +with their origin: they have changed their language +in a manner analogous to their origin. There is little +resemblance between the French and the ancient Celtic, +there being only some analogy in grammar, but not in +words; in the south of France, on the other hand, as far as +it was once inhabited by Aquitanians, Iberians, and +Ligurians, the people speak Provençal, while the north of +France, which was once inhabited by Celts, has a different +dialect. This Romano-French, which has grown on Celtic +ground, extends all over Savoy as far as Aosta, and shows +that the country was originally inhabited by Celts. The +Alpine tribes in those parts were not completely subdued +until the time of Augustus. During the period of the +decline of the Etruscans, the Ligurians spread far into the +interior of Tuscany; and soon after the Hannibalian war, +the Romans came in collision with them, not because they +had offended the Romans, but the latter only wanted to +gain a passage through their country to Spain. I have +already observed that physically we can distinguish the +countries once inhabited by Etruscans and Ligurians, and a +greater contrast can scarcely exist. In Etruria the powerful +cities ruled as sovereigns over all the neighbouring +places and extensive territories; the Ligurians, on the other +hand, were absolutely democratic, and had scarcely any +towns. A port town like Genoa was a small place, but +otherwise they lived in villages on the hills and in the +valleys; the equality subsisting among them has no parallel +anywhere except in modern Europe. They had no slaves; +all were thoroughly free, and the Ligurian, working in the +sweat of his brow, performed as a free labourer the services +which were elsewhere the work of slaves. This difference +in character is clearly manifested in the kind of resistance +offered to the Romans by the Etruscans and by the Ligurians. +For the same reason Charlemagne found it infinitely +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_251">[251]</span>more difficult to subdue the Saxons and Frisians, for they +were free people, and although there were some serfs among +them, yet freedom had never been really crushed. The +Turingians, on the other hand, who ruled over extensive +territories, in which the ancient inhabitants had become +serfs, were conquered at a blow; so also the Alemanni, who +possessed a large country extending as far as the lower +Rhine: they had no basis. As they ruled over serfs, the +greater part of the population was foreign and hostile to them. +On the other hand, it took centuries to subdue the Obotritae +and Slavonians, who defended their own independence. Such, +also, was the case of the Ligurians: they consisted of a large +number of small tribes, which unfortunately defended themselves +each separately. If they had kept together, they +would have been invincible, for each of them held out +with the most determined perseverance. Their misfortune +makes one’s heart ache: they were crushed by the +Romans one by one, just as a strong wall is demolished +piece by piece. The conquerors were obliged to transplant +them into foreign countries; and one of their tribes is said +by Pliny to have been transplanted thirty times, in order to +break up all connection among them. Many thousands of +them were led into southern Italy, and settled in the modern +kingdom of Naples, where their language was not understood, +and where they themselves were unwelcome neighbours. +The extraordinary industry of the Ligurians in agriculture +and navigation, their frugality, and in short, all that we +know of them reflects great honour upon them. We cannot, +therefore, look upon their destruction with less sadness than +upon that of Numantia. Little can be said about the +geography of this people.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Genua</span> is situated on one of those spots which will +always be the site of a great commercial town, on account +of the excellent harbour which nature herself has made. +Its situation is of that fortunate kind that it cannot become +unfavourable even in the course of time, like so many +harbours which have become useless during the middle +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_252">[252]</span>ages by the accumulation of sand or mud. After the Punic +war, Genua was destroyed, but was restored soon after; and +there can be no doubt that even in antiquity it was a respectable +town.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Augusta Taurinorum</span>, a military colony of Augustus, +was likewise a considerable town, but not to be compared +with what it came to be at a later period. In comparison +with the modern city of Turin, it was no doubt always a +small place. On the whole, you must not conceive such +military colonies to have been very large; the ancient +Roman towns were much smaller than those of modern +times; we generally imagine them to have been larger on +account of the importance they have in history; but on an +average they were not larger than, for example, Bonn. A +place of the extent of Cologne, would have been a very +considerable town in the time of the Romans. After the +decline of Rome under the emperors, Italy had rather a +numerous population, but in the age of Cicero and Augustus, +as I have already remarked, it was certainly far more +thinly peopled than at present. The population of the +modern kingdom of Naples, north of the Faro, is reported +to be 6,000,000, while under Charles V. it is said to have +amounted to only 600,000. It is, indeed, said that, under +Charles V., families were counted and not persons; but admitting +that the number of persons was 2,000,000, which is +the highest that can be made out, still it is an undoubted +fact, that in less than three centuries the population has +become more than trebled. I do not believe that, in the +reign of Augustus, the population was larger than under +Charles V. The astonishment with which Polybius and +others mention the fact, that previously to the Hannibalian +war, Italy as far as the Cisalpine frontier had 700,000 men +capable of bearing arms, is too decisive to allow us to suppose +that the country was thickly peopled. Italy clearly +reminds us of the condition of Germany after the Thirty +Years’ war, of which we have descriptions in books of travel; +and that state of Italy, as we see from Lucan, continued +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_253">[253]</span>until a late period. I have read a description of Germany +by an Italian who travelled in the country thirty years +after the war, and who saw the villages and buildings +everywhere in ruins, and even the towns were full of heaps +of ruins and decaying houses.</p> + +<p>The valley of Aosta, the country of the Salassians, is +remarkable for its gold-dust and gold-washings in the river +Doria. Gold still exists there, but little, for such veins +often are entirely drained.</p> + +<h3 id="Sicilia"><span class="smcap">Sicilia.</span></h3> + +<p>In passing on to the islands, I shall first speak of Sicily, +the queen of the islands in the Mediterranean. It derives, +like Italy and most other countries, its name from its +inhabitants, and Sicilia is the country of the Siculi. I +have already said that Itali and Siculi are the same name in +different dialects, and that accordingly both denote the +same people. The general tradition of antiquity is, that the +Siculi migrated from Italy into the island, and pushed the +Sicani, its previous inhabitants, into the western and +southern parts. Those who go back to the mythical ages, +represent the island in the most ancient times as inhabited +by Gigantes, Cyclopes, and Laestrygones. It is a widely-spread +opinion among the ancients, that the Sicani belonged +to the race of the Iberians. The Sicani called themselves +Autochthons, while, according to others, they had come +from Iberia, having been displaced by Ligurians; but such +an emigration, so far across the sea and by so many intermediate +countries as the Balearian islands and Sardinia, or, +if you please, along the coast of Africa, is incredible in the +case of a people like the Iberians, who never were great +navigators. I believe that, in this account, we can keep +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_254">[254]</span>only to this one point, that, according to the conviction of +those who most thoroughly understand the circumstances, +the Sicani belonged to the Iberian race, even if we admit +that the tradition about their emigration is without foundation; +and this is very possible. It is equally possible that +the story about the emigration of the Siculi from Italy is +without foundation; at least our authorities for it are not +authentic. Another question is, as to whether the Sicani +and Siculi were everywhere different people; the testimonies +of the ancients must, of course, be of the greatest weight +to us in this matter. I am not one of those who build +history upon the mere names of nations, and am, therefore, +not much inclined to lay great stress upon the resemblance +of the two names; but Virgil uses Sicani and Siculi as +synonymous, and this leads us to infer that he probably had +more ancient authors before him, who had done the same. +It is true also, that such a change of form is not unprecedented, +for <i>Aequus</i>, <i>Aequanus</i>, <i>Aequulus</i>, <i>Aequicus</i>, and <i>Aequiculus</i>, +are only derivatives from the same basis; and in like manner +we might regard <i>Sicanus</i> and <i>Siculus</i> as simple derivatives +of the stem <i>Sicus</i>. I should believe this to be quite correct, +were it not that the ancients speak so positively of the +Iberian origin of the Sicani. I should, in fact, reject this +origin, were it not certain that Iberians existed in Corsica, +Sardinia, and the Balearian islands, and in ancient times, +when the Celts dwelt as far as the Sierra Morena, probably +even on the coast of Africa. The Basque language is foreign +to all European languages known to us; it belongs, as it +were, to a different part of the world. But however this +may be, the two nations in Sicily were different from each +other, though we cannot say whether the difference was +one of race or of a less striking nature. The Siculi inhabited +the north-eastern part of the island, and the Sicani the +southern and western.</p> + +<p>At the time when the Phoenicians were in possession of +the most important islands of the Aegean, as Thasos and +Cythera, and had settlements in most of the Cyclades; they +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_255">[255]</span>also occupied strong points on the coast of Sicily; they +were generally small places in little islands, headlands and +the like, not being intended as agricultural settlements, but +as factories. But they disappeared in consequence of the +Greek colonies, which commenced at an early period, and +according to the traditions from annals of which Thucydides +probably made indirect use through Antiochus, soon +after the beginning of the Olympiads. The colonies came +from two of the Greek tribes, the Dorians and Chalcidians. +In Italy, there was, properly speaking, only one Doric city +that was really great, whereas in Sicily Doric cities preponderated +both in number and greatness, witness Syracuse, +which Timaeus calls the largest Greek city, Agrigentum, +which was but little inferior to Syracuse, Gela, Selinus, and +Camarina. Zancle (afterwards Messana), Naxos, Leontini, +Catana, and Himera, on the north coast, were of Chalcidian +origin. All the towns on the north-east, on a line from +Syracuse to Palermo, were Chalcidian, and those on the +south-west of it were Dorian. In speaking of the towns of +Sicily, I shall make some deviation from the general rule +I have hitherto followed, and enumerate them not in their +natural succession, but according to their magnitude.</p> + +<p>Sicily, like most other countries which are surrounded by +the sea on two sides, presents the physical character of two +different countries. In Andalusia and Algarvia, the character +of the animal and vegetable world up to the mountains is +African; and, in like manner, the southern part of Sicily is +completely African, and the palm-tree grows there as beautifully +as in Tunis and Tripoli; but the country north of +cape Heraeum is quite different.</p> + +<p>If we except the south-western coast and the district +about Leontini, Sicily is altogether a mountainous country. +Mount Aetna is the real central knot of the island, and the +highest mountains proceed from it in a north-eastern direction +as far as cape Pelorus just opposite to Italy. The +Heraean range likewise proceeds from Aetna in a western +direction, while another chain extends southwards. This +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_256">[256]</span>last range is considerably lower than the others, but +still high enough to form the watershed between the eastern +and western coast. In the part between Palermo and +Messina, the mountains approach very close to the coast, +so that often two places situated on the coast are not connected +by a road, just as is the case in many parts of +Liguria. Hence, during the wars of the Romans, we never +find that the northern coast formed their scene of operation, +which it is in all the wars on the south coast, for in this latter +part there are roads, and armies can move. But on the +northern coast there never was any communication either +in the Punic wars or in those of the middle ages and modern +times. It is of importance to know this in order to understand +the history of the first Punic war.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Aetna</span> is the highest mountain both of Italy and Sicily; +it had only very few eruptions in antiquity, but they were +sometimes of a violence which has never been equalled in +modern times. According to Thucydides, the third eruption, +after the settlement of the Greeks in Sicily, occurred +in his own days, in the time of the Peloponnesian war. We +need not, however, scrupulously insist on this number, for +it is possible that all the eruptions were not recorded, and +that there had been some at a time when no annals were +yet kept. The eruptions of which we know, belong to +Olympiads 70, 82,⁠<a id="FNanchor_60" href="#Footnote_60" class="fnanchor">[60]</a> and Olymp. 88, 3, or the sixth year of +the Peloponnesian war. The greatest subsequent eruption +in ancient times occurred after the death of Caesar. A still +more terrible one is recorded by the earliest Byzantine +writers of the age of the Greek emperor Anastasius or Zeno. +During the eruption in the age of Caesar, the ashes are said +to have been thrown as far as Peloponnesus and Africa, +which is probably no exaggeration; but it seems scarcely +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_257">[257]</span>possible that, in the reign of Anastasius, the ashes should +have been carried as far as Constantinople, though it certainly +is very difficult positively to assert anything about these +powers of nature.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Eryx</span> (monte S. Giuliano), situated in an isolated position +on the western promontory, is a mountain of great historical +interest. It is high, but a tame mountain, and is celebrated +for its temple of Venus Erycina; but it has been immortalised +in history by the defence of Hamilcar Barcas, who was +blockaded there by the Romans for years, and maintained +himself in spite of all difficulties: that defence is one of the +greatest events in military history.</p> + +<p>Whether Sicily derived the name <i>Trinacria</i> from its three +promontories, which seems to us very probable, or whether +this is only apparent, and the name arose from a Siculian +town of a similar name (Trinacia or Thrinacia), independently +of the form of the island, is one of those questions, +concerning which it is best to confess that they cannot be +satisfactorily answered.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Syracusae</span>, at first probably <span class="smcap">Syracusa</span>, was the greatest +Greek city in Sicily. The plural form of the name probably +did not come into use until the time when several towns +were united in one great city; afterwards, during the decline +of the language, it was again called Syracusa. There +exists an abridgment of six books (from 21 to 26) of +Diodorus Siculus, which was no doubt made in Sicily itself, +but at a late period, for it already contains several modern +Greek expressions, and among others, also the form Syracusa. +Those of the Byzantine writers who did not want to write +learnedly, likewise have the singular. It is well known +that Syracuse was a Corinthian colony led out by the +Bacchiad Archias; the first settlement was formed in the +island of Ortygia (to which the modern Siragossa also is +confined), for the sake of safety against the attacks of the +inhabitants of the interior. It commenced its career as a +commercial place; and this first colony was small like all +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_258">[258]</span>the other Greek settlements, as, for example, Cyrene. The +island in the Doric dialect was called νᾶσος, and the Romans +also retained this name (<i>Nasos</i>), as we know from Cicero’s +Verrine orations. A suburb of the name of <i>Achradina</i> +(from ἀχράς, the wild pear-tree) arose on the main land +opposite the island. This suburb, which increased considerably, +is the Syracuse of the middle period, that is, under +the first Gelo and the first Hiero, until the time of the +Peloponnesian war. Nasos then became the Acra, but +Achradina alone was fortified. By the side of this latter, +again two large suburbs arose, <i>Neapolis</i> and <i>Tycha</i>; they seem +to have commenced at two different gates, and perhaps ran +parallel to each other, but were separated by a considerable +intervening space. They, too, became important towns, so +that Syracuse was a tetrapolis. The last two of these places +which had not been fortified at all, or only feebly, were +surrounded by Dionysius with a wall which he constructed +at a distance of about three miles from the island. Above +Syracuse there runs a range of hills, and you may easily +understand its situation, by comparing it with the neighbourhood +of Bonn, the plain extending between the +Vorgebirge and the Rhine: the city must be conceived to +be situated in the plain upon the Rhine, whence it gradually +extends towards the Vorgebirge. These hills, which, just +like our Vorgebirge, bound the plain stretching to the sea, +were called <i>Epipolae</i>. They were from early times surmounted +by forts, the object of which was to protect the district in +the petty wars with the Siculians; during the Athenian war +also they were very dangerous on account of the great +enlargement of the city. Dionysius then fortified the city +by building two mighty walls up the heights, so as to +enclose those forts which now became citadels. The whole +of the intermediate space between the walls, however, must +not be imagined to have been covered with buildings, for +between Neapolis and Tycha there were extensive tracts +which can never have been built upon; the quarries also +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_259">[259]</span>could not be built over, as is clear from the whole surface of the +ground. But the circumference of the city was enormous.</p> + +<p>The misfortunes of Syracuse are very painful: it was +visited by such a succession of devastations that we can +hardly understand how it could maintain itself: it must +have possessed an unusual degree of vital power. I believe +that its happiest period was the reign of the last Hiero, +though the population may at that time already have been +much smaller than it had been in the earlier prosperous periods. +In the Hannibalian war, when the city was taken by the +Romans, Neapolis and Tycha were completely destroyed, +and the alleged mildness of Marcellus was of no avail, for +the work of destruction was completed with barbarous fury. +At the capture of Achradina, Marcellus ordered to spare +the lives of the inhabitants, and not to carry away a free-born +Syracusan into slavery. This is always praised as an +act of great humanity; but a new fragment in the excerpts +from Diodorus shows that this apparently humane order +did not prevent the complete pillage of the city: the Syracusans +were robbed of everything, and freedom alone was +granted to them. But this gift rendered their condition +worse even than that of slaves, who received at least some +food from their masters, while the free men died of hunger, +no person supplying them with anything. Thus it happened +that many a free man gave himself out to be a slave +in order to find a purchaser and food. This is probably the +most fearful occurrence in all ancient history. After that +time there existed in Neapolis and Tycha only a few +isolated buildings and temples, and the population disappeared; +even in Achradina only very few inhabitants +appear to have remained, for in Cicero’s time the real +population was again confined to the island of Nasos; the +same appears to have been the condition of the city under +the emperors, and at present it is still the same. Under +Augustus a Roman colony was established there; still, however, +the whole island of Sicily was so essentially Greek, that +under the emperors it was always regarded as a part of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_260">[260]</span>Greece. Even at the time of the Norman conquest, in the +eleventh century of our era, Greek and Arabic were the +only languages spoken there.</p> + +<p>Although the Syracusans are not among those Greeks +who excite our sympathy for them in the highest degree, +yet their history is one of the most melancholy in ancient +times. The whole of Greek history is very saddening in +its course, but none more so than that of Syracuse, and if +we seriously contemplate it, it is heartrending. The Syracusans +throughout show a lawlessness which rendered them +incapable of governing themselves; their only salvation +was a mild usurper, as, for example, the last Hiero; he was +a mild and kindly man, although even he did things which +make us shudder; but this was natural in the case of Greek +usurpers. The history of Syracuse begins with an aristocratic +form of government, the first settlers ruling over a +considerable territory, and the ancient inhabitants having +become serfs (κιλλικύριοι). Servitude afterwards disappears, +and a demos is formed, which is increased by new settlers +from all parts of Greece, and has to struggle with the lords +of the soil (γάμοροι). Gelo, one of these lords, put himself +at the head of the demos, and for the sake of appearances +established a democracy, but set himself up as tyrant. +Under Hiero, Syracuse was extremely prosperous; with +him the tyrannis ceased and democracy was restored, but +was found wanting as soon as it was put to the test, and a +struggle gradually arose between the wealthy few and the +multitude. During this struggle there arose Dionysius I., +an ambitious man, not a benefactor of the people, though +he was useful in several respects, for the people could not +do without a ruler. He was succeeded by his unworthy +son, quite a detestable person; it was now impossible to +live without a usurper, but it was equally impossible to +endure him. The distressing condition became worse in +consequence of the unsuccessful undertaking of Dion, +respecting whom Plato was so singularly mistaken, and +whom he regarded in the light of his own ideal of what a +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_261">[261]</span>man should be. Timoleon, a really great man, expelled +Dionysius by force, and restored happiness and prosperity +to the city for a period of twenty years. He ruled solely +by his personal authority, and the people, for once, were +grateful to him. After his death, fresh divisions arose, and +Agathocles, a bold but oriental miscreant of unprincipled +impudence, usurped the supreme power. Under his dominion +of Syracuse became great and brilliant, but not prosperous: +it was fearfully ill used; it became a den of robbers, and +mercenaries of every description deluged the city with +torrents of blood. Long protracted, and devastating internal +wars then followed, after which came the more than +fifty years’ reign of Hiero, during which Syracuse was +confined to a small territory. It often ruled over the whole +island; but the state of things was ever changing.</p> + +<p>The population of Syracuse is estimated at 1,200,000 +souls; and this number is adopted in a great many books, +but it is quite inconceivable. The population of all Sicily +at present amounts to from 1,600,000 to 1,700,000, and +seventy or eighty years ago it was only 1,200,000. How +then is it possible, that Syracuse alone should have had +such a population of free men? Diodorus indeed speaks of +thirty myriads, but they must be understood as the numbers in +the Roman census, that is, as comprising not only the citizens +of Syracuse, but including all the inhabitants of the towns +which stood to Syracuse in the relation of isopolity. Hence +we may assume that Syracuse itself, at the time of its +highest prosperity, contained within its walls at the most +200,000 inhabitants, including both free men and slaves, +and I should be surprised to find that it actually did amount +to so much. You remember that Thebes, when it was +destroyed by Alexander, contained only 30,000 persons +of every age, rank, and sex. The statements about the +population in antiquity are monstrously exaggerated; the +numbers are not always fictitious, but are founded upon +misunderstandings.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Agrigentum</span> (Ἀκράγας, according to the common derivation +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_262">[262]</span>of such names, where ς is changed into <i>ntum</i>) was +the second large city in Sicily. Plans of it are found in +books of travel, and in Graevius’ Thesaurus; but nothing +can be more erroneous than they are, for towns in the +neighbourhood are represented as parts of Agrigentum, +which they never were. It was a Rhodian colony, and was +inferior in greatness to Syracuse alone. The population is +said to have amounted to 200,000 souls; but the case is +quite similar to that of Syracuse, as is clear from another +statement, which mentions only 20,000. Both numbers +may be correct, if we take the 20,000 as that of the real +citizens, and the 200,000 as comprising all the isopolites +of Agrigentum. But notwithstanding all this, the population +of Sicily in ancient times was far larger than it is at +present; its numbers in the towns of the island change with +incredible rapidity. In the middle ages, Messina had +140,000 inhabitants; at the end of the seventeenth century, +the ill-usage of the Spaniards reduced them to somewhat +less than 100,000, and the plague brought them down to +90,000; afterwards, by the systematic oppression, the object +of which was to crush Messina and to raise Palermo, they +were reduced to 40,000; and before the earthquake their +number amounted only to 25,000; at present it is said to +be 70,000. Such is the vitality in those southern countries, +and such are the changes in their population. In the +north, too, fluctuations occur, but not to the same extent as +in the south, where people have so few wants, and many +can live in the open air without a cover for their heads +until some favourable opportunity occurs. Immense ruins +of Agrigentum still exist: it was situated on a hill and was +visible from the sea at a great distance, whence Virgil says, +<i>Arduus hic Acragas ostendit maxima longe moenia</i>. I have +already directed your attention to the fact that <i>moenia</i> +signifies “large buildings in a city;” the walls of Agrigentum +had nothing striking, and parts of them ran in the +valley, so that Virgil cannot have alluded to them. The +buildings of the city were not yet quite completed when +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_263">[263]</span>they were destroyed in the Carthaginian war; they were +much larger than those at Syracuse or any other of the +Greek towns of Sicily. Before the war in Olymp. 93, +Agrigentum was the wealthiest city in the island; but the +stories of the riches of particular citizens, as, for example, +of Gellias, which Diodorus relates after Timaeus, are quite +fabulous, for Timaeus was credulous. In Olymp. 93, Agrigentum +was taken and completely destroyed by the Carthaginians; +the town was defended in the most unfortunate +manner, or not defended at all: the Greek generals during +that war were so wretched and senseless, that the Agrigentines +had enough to do in trying to save themselves, leaving +their city with all its treasures a prey to the enemy. It +was afterwards restored indeed, but the new town was only +a shadow of what it had been before. In consequence of +the treaties by which Selinus was ceded to the Carthaginians, +Agrigentum was re-united with the Greek part of Sicily, of +which Syracuse, under Dionysius and Timoleon, was the +capital. Afterwards the character of the wars between +the Greeks and Carthaginians was no longer as destructive +as it had been before, for Carthage was satisfied with subduing +and ruling over the Greek towns. After the reign +of Agathocles, Agrigentum again fell into the hands of the +Carthaginians. In the first Punic war, it was taken by the +Romans, and on that occasion one part of its inhabitants +made their escape, while others perished or were sold as +slaves. Towards the end of the Punic war, it was again +implicated in an insurrection against the Romans, in consequence +of which it became so desolate that the Romans, +to prevent the complete extinction of the place, established +there colonists from other Sicilian towns. Agrigentum is +indeed mentioned in Cicero’s Verrine orations, but it is +clear that it was quite an insignificant town; under the +Roman emperors it remained in the same condition, and +may have been of little more importance than the modern +Girgenti. The gigantic ruins of the ancient city are situated +on the plateau of the hill: the severest blow it ever +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_264">[264]</span>received was that in Olymp. 93, and subsequent earthquakes +also contributed to its destruction.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Selinus</span>, nearer the western promontory, was likewise +a Dorian settlement. It was an extensive, wealthy, and +important town at the time when the Carthaginians, after +the unsuccessful attempt under Gelo, who confined them to +their three factories, Motye, Panormus, and Soloeis, were +expelled from all other parts of the island. But during the +unfortunate Carthaginian war, by means of which Dionysius +raised himself, it was the first town that was captured and +destroyed. After that time, it is indeed still mentioned, +and in fact never ceased to exist, but was never again incorporated +with the Greek portion of Sicily. It remained +subject to Carthage, as long as she had any possessions in +the island, and then came into the hands of the Romans, but +never acquired any importance.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Gela</span>, likewise an ancient Dorian settlement, was abandoned +by its Greek inhabitants during the Carthaginian war, +and destroyed by the Carthaginians. Even before this, the +place had several times changed its population: in the time +of Gelo it was restored, but after the repeated destructions +by its enemies, it recovered only partially. It received its +death-blow shortly after the time of Agathocles, when +Phintias, the tyrant of Agrigentum, transplanted its inhabitants +to the town of Phintias, founded by himself.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Camarina</span> experienced the same fate as Gela.</p> + +<p>On the southern coast there existed, at different times, +several Doric towns, as <i>Heraclea</i> in the territory of Agrigentum, +<i>Acrae</i>, and <i>Casmenae</i>, but they are of no importance.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Naxos</span>, the most ancient among the Chalcidian or +Ionian settlements, was situated between mount Aetna and +the Sicilian straits; it was in fact the earliest Greek colony +in Sicily. It is doubtful whether Naxos was destroyed by +Gelo or Hiero. During the great period of Sicilian history +its name is not mentioned.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Zancle</span>, afterwards <span class="smcap">Messene</span> or <span class="smcap">Messana</span>; the cause of +this change of name is obscure. The story about Gorgus, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_265">[265]</span>the son of Aristomenes, and Manticlus, is untenable and +chronologically impossible. Still, however, there must have +been a mixture of Messenians which gave rise to the name. +Samians, who had fled from their own country, treacherously +took possession of the town in which they had been hospitably +received. More than two hundred years later, their +descendants were punished for the deed by the Campanian +mercenaries of Agathocles, who butchered the inhabitants +who had allowed them a passage through their town. +After this time the place was always called Messana, +while the inhabitants bore the name of Mamertines, which +was the general designation for Oscan mercenaries. These +Mamertines retained their Italian character, without becoming +hellenised in any way; and even as late as the time of +Verres we find them mentioned with their Oscan names, +the praenomen and the nomen gentilicium. Their coins, +however, have inscriptions in Greek characters, and I have +no doubt that in the course of time the Mamertines also +became hellenised. The Roman element in the western +countries was powerful in regard to the Celts, Iberians and +others; but it was unable to cope with the Greeks, against +whom the Romans did not gain one inch; no Greek town +ever became Latinised, unless all its inhabitants perished. +Among non-Greek nations, such as the Pannonians, Dardanians, +and the other tribes in those countries, the Latin +language became predominant within an extremely short +period. The name Mamertines remained in use until the +time of the Roman emperors, but it then disappears, and the +name Messana is again generally employed.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Catana</span>, likewise a considerable Chalcidian town, was +situated near the river Simaethus, at the foot of mount +Aetna. Hiero I. carried away the inhabitants, and founded +a new town; but after his death everything was restored. +After the time of the Athenian expedition, Catana was +nearly always under the influence of Syracuse.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Tauromenium</span>, in the neighbourhood of Naxos between +mount Aetna and Messana, was founded in the time of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_266">[266]</span>Timoleon. It was situated on mount Tauros, which was +quite inaccessible. The derivation of its name ἀπὸ τῆς +ἐπὶ τοῦ Ταύρου μονῆς is strange. With the exception of +Phintias, it was the youngest of the Greek towns in Sicily. +These late colonies are essentially different from the earlier +ones: they had no oecistae and no institutions according to +the ancient forms, but being the result of circumstances +they did not observe the traditionary formalities. Tauromenium +was very strong by its situation; and, in consequence +of the nature of its locality, its ruins are more perfectly +preserved than those of any other Greek city in Sicily. The +splendid theatre was cut in a semicircle into the rock, and +still exists in its ancient beauty. In the history of literature, +Tauromenium is celebrated as the birth-place of the historian +Timaeus, who, as we have learned only recently, spent +the greater part of his long life of ninety years in exile at +Athens, where in all probability he also died. The fifty +years of his exile embrace the whole reign of Agathocles.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Leontini</span> was situated at some distance from the coast. +It is a mistake in translations and other books to call this +town Leontium, a name which does not occur anywhere. +Its original name must have been Λεοῦς, although this +form is not found in the extant monuments either. As +Messana was called Mamertini, from its Oscan inhabitants, +so also in the case of Leontini, the name of the people was +used as the name of the town. It was the chief place in +the most fertile corn district of Sicily, and the <i>campi Leontini</i> +are often mentioned on this account. The town was destroyed +by the Syracusans at least three times, but always +recovered itself.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Himera</span>, on the north coast, was a colony of Chalcidians +mixed with Dorians, but in such a manner that the νόμιμα +Χαλκιδικὰ prevailed. In Olymp. 93, it was destroyed by +the Carthaginians. The town itself was never restored, +but around some hot springs in the neighbourhood (θερμὰ +Ἱμεραῖα) a small town of the name of <i>Therma</i>, or <i>Thermae</i>, +arose, whose inhabitants were called <i>Thermitani</i>. This +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_267">[267]</span>town is remarkable as the birth-place of Agathocles, who, +though a monster, is yet an important person in history. +Himera was one of the genuine ancient Greek colonies.</p> + +<p>On the north coast between Himera and Messana, there +were several Greek towns of uncertain origin, which were +probably founded by neighbouring cities, and were afterwards +inhabited by Greeks of all kinds. Places of this kind +are <i>Cephaloedion</i>, <i>Mylae</i>, and <i>Calacte</i>; they are not of great +importance, and I cannot here enter into any detail about +them.</p> + +<p>In the time of Thucydides there existed three Punic +towns on the north-west coast of Sicily, viz., <i>Soloeis</i>, <i>Motye</i>, +and <i>Panormus</i>. Motye was the principal place among them, +and stood to Carthage in the same relation as Utica, Leptis, +and others. About thirty years before the passage of +Xerxes into Europe, at the time of the expulsion of Tarquin, +the Carthaginians were already in possession of a province +in Sicily; they then concluded a treaty with Rome, which +has been preserved by Polybius. Ancient Greek history +gives us no information about this, but rather makes it +appear as if their attempt in the time of Gelo to establish +themselves in Sicily had been the first; but the treaty with +Rome is indubitable. The statement that the victory of +Salamis, and that of Gelo over the Carthaginians at Himera, +took place on the same day, a coincidence on which Herodotus +lays great stress, is likewise untenable, for it is +opposed to the account which we have in the Parian marbles +from Timaeus. The origin of the fiction evidently lies in +the desire to have a parallel. Gelo’s victory must be dated +seven or nine years later than the time to which it is +assigned by Diodorus. After that defeat, the Carthaginians +always maintained themselves on the north-western coast, +where no Greek town existed. When, in the course of +time, the power of the Carthaginians had greatly increased, +and when they displayed a love of conquest, the neighbouring +town of Egesta threw itself into their arms. The Greeks +in Sicily were, on the one hand, extremely careless, and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_268">[268]</span>on the other fool-hardy in giving provocation, and these +circumstances gave rise to the unfortunate war with Carthage. +In the second war with Dionysius, Motye, which +until then, had been the chief place of the Carthaginians, +was destroyed. They now built a new town, Olymp. 100, +of the name of <i>Lilybaeum</i>: when it was taken by the Romans, +it had existed about 150 years. It was the seat of the +Carthaginian government, a regular Carthaginian eparchy +being established in those parts, which is always called +ἡ Φοινικικὴ ἐπαρχία. Bochart’s etymologies, from the Semitic +languages, are often quite without foundation, but he +explains the name Lilybaeum quite correctly as ללבי, that +is, opposite to Libya. <i>Soloeis</i> was an unimportant place.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Panormus</span> became a great town under the dominion of +the Carthaginians. It is strange that both Soloeis and +Panormus are Greek names; the money coined in the latter +place at the time of the Carthaginian dominion in Sicily, is +likewise Greek, from which we must infer that Panormus +was not a Punic colony like Lilybaeum. The natural +advantages of its situation are very great: it has an excellent +harbour, as even its name intimates, and its site is in a +beautiful fertile plain on the coast, above which mount +Hercte rises at the entrance of the harbour. This mountain +was a very important post during the first Punic war.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Lilybaeum</span> remained an important place even under the +Romans, though its name is afterwards but rarely mentioned. +The Romans, for financial purposes, divided Sicily +into two provinces, viz., Syracuse and Lilybaeum; they +were governed by one praetor, but had different financial +administrations, because the systems of taxation were different +in the two parts. So long as Carthage existed, the +Romans kept up Lilybaeum as a place of arms and a military +port; but the place afterwards lost this importance, because +its harbour was gradually filled with sand. It is at present +known only for its excellent vineyards.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Drepana</span>, the modern Trapani, near Lilybaeum, was +another strongly fortified port town of the Carthaginians, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_269">[269]</span>and is still of importance. All these places act a conspicuous +part in the first Punic war.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Egesta</span>, or <span class="smcap">Segesta</span>, was situated in the neighbourhood +of Drepana. Thucydides says that its inhabitants were +Trojans; and the unanimous voice of antiquity calls the +Egestans and the Elymi, there and about mount Eryx, +Trojans. I have explained my opinion on this point in +my Roman History, and shewn that Trojans here means +Tyrrhenians or Pelasgians, like those occupying the coasts of +Italy and Sardinia. The name Trojans, therefore, seems to +have been a general Pelasgian name, which was commonly +applied to the Mysian Trojans, because they were the most +important, just as the name Hellenes was commonly given to +the people of Argos. All these nations were connected by +religion and their common sanctuary of Samothrace, the +Trojan character of which is undeniable. The Segestans +are called by the Greeks barbarians, and they were certainly +non-Greeks; but when we consider the ruins of their temples, +which are not only grand but splendid, and are in no +way inferior to the most beautiful Greek edifices; and when +we see their coins, which equal the finest specimens made +in Greece, we must confess that the word “barbarian” cannot +be understood here in the same sense in which it is applied +to Thracians, Getae, and Macedonians, who were not even +able correctly to imitate the formation of Greek words. +Afterwards, Segesta, like all the rest of the island, became +completely hellenised; Cicero always calls the Siculi +Greeks, and the names of the Segestans, wherever they +occur in history, are Greek. Segesta was an unfortunate +place, for it was the occasion of the deplorable expedition +of the Athenians to Sicily, of which we can only +lament the final issue. It would have been fortunate, if +the Athenians had been able to carry it out with energy, +for the fate of Greece would have taken a different direction. +The Segestans have much to answer for to Sicily, to Greece, +and to all the world, for they misled the Athenians by their +delusive promises. After the defeat of the Athenians, the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_270">[270]</span>Chalcidian towns one by one concluded peace, and the +Segestans, abandoned by every one, were obliged to throw +themselves into the arms of the Carthaginians. Under +their protection, the town was safe and prosperous for a +period of about ninety years, until the time when the power +of Agathocles reached its highest point. But when Agathocles +was victorious for a time, it was taken by the sword, +and treated like Magdeburg in the Thirty Years’ war. Afterwards +a population again assembled there; in the first Punic +war Segesta is mentioned again, and submits to the Romans +under an appeal to its Trojan origin.</p> + +<p>The towns in the interior of Sicily were originally partly +Siculian and partly Sicanian, though it is now impossible to +draw a line of demarcation between them. In the north, about +mount Aetna as far as Henna, all the towns, such as Henna, +Centuripa, Agyrion, Halesa, Aluntion, and many others, were +probably Siculian. The Siculians, even after the time of Gelo, +formed distinct states and had their own kings. Diodorus +compiled his history in a most unsystematic manner: when +he is engaged with the history of a nation, and it occurs +to him, that he has dwelt upon it long enough, and that he +has neglected another, he all at once breaks off and begins +to discuss the latter. Such is the case in his history of +Sicily: he is often very minute, relating the events of a +nation year after year, but then he is for a time quite silent +about it. After the time of Gelo and Hiero, we find a Siculian +kingdom, under a prince called Ducetius, which was very +dangerous to the Siceliots.⁠<a id="FNanchor_61" href="#Footnote_61" class="fnanchor">[61]</a> Afterwards we see the Siculians +broken up into many small states, some of which were +hellenised at a very early period. The power of the Greek +tyrants often extended very far into the interior; and those +of Syracuse at times ruled almost over the whole island; +during such times, Greeks settled in all parts of it. These +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_271">[271]</span>things are often mentioned only accidentally, as for example, +in the case of Diodorus himself, who is called a Siceliot, +though he belonged to a Siculian town. At that time +the Siculian and Sicanian languages no longer existed and +Greek was spoken everywhere.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Henna</span>, situated in the centre of the country, was the +most important of all the Siculian towns. Henna, and not +Enna, is the correct spelling, for so we find it on a very +ancient Greek coin; and only later Latin ones have Enna, +whereas all the good Latin MSS., such as the Codex +Puteanus of Livy, as well as the inscriptions, have the H, +as in <i>ordo populusque Hennensis</i>; in after-times the pronunciation +was modified. I do not, however, mean to say, that +if you find Enna in a poet, you must at once correct it into +Henna, for such things depend upon authority; the ancients +often pronounced a word with an aspiration, which we +cannot accurately imitate, and which, therefore, has disappeared +in Italian and other modern languages. Henna is +celebrated as the central seat of the worship of Demeter and +Persephone, which spread thence into Italy, and was also +adopted by the Greeks. It was probably different from +the worship of Demeter at Eleusis; but we cannot speak +positively about this matter, and in my opinion, it is a mere +waste of learning and ingenuity to institute inquiries +about it.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Centuripa</span> (<i>Centuripini</i>, Κεντόριπα), near the slope of +mount Aetna, was the greatest town of the interior at the +time of the Romans. In the age of Cicero, its citizens were +the wealthiest in all Sicily. In the first Punic war, they +had been enabled by circumstances, about which we have +no information, to put themselves in an extremely favourable +relation to the Romans; this had been done at a time when +the other Siculian places had allowed themselves to be +tempted to rise against Rome; and in consequence of this, +Centuripa was honoured with great privileges. It derived +special advantages from the extensive confiscations which +were often made of whole districts. On such occasions, the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_272">[272]</span>Roman equites speculated to acquire large estates, and the +Centuripans undertook as farmers (<i>aratores</i>), or agricultural +speculators, the cultivation of large districts; the existence +of such aratores is known from Cicero’s Verrine orations. +Centuripa then remained the centre of Sicilian agriculture, +probably until a very late period. <i>Agyrion</i> was situated in +the neighbourhood of Centuripa.</p> + +<p>I have already said in general how Sicily became a +desolate country. When many towns had already been +destroyed in the wars of Agathocles, the first Punic war, +which lasted twenty-four years, was extremely destructive, +because it was carried on at the expense of that small country; +the Syracusan kingdom alone, which was in the +enjoyment of order and protection, was exempted. Then +followed the second Punic war, and the senseless insurrection +of the Syracusans and of nearly all the inhabitants +of the island. They were punished by the Romans in such +a manner, that all cultivation disappeared from the greater +part of the island; the towns perished and were changed +into large estates; the corn-fields in the interior were changed +into pastures, on which large numbers of cattle and hosts +of slaves were kept, while the free population was almost +entirely extirpated. Hence the insurrection of Eunus, in +the year of Rome 620; a war was then carried on with +great exertion for years, and was not brought to a close +until several Roman armies had been defeated. Thirty +years later, a second similar Servile war broke out, which, +though it did not last quite as long as the first, yet completely +ruined several towns: the slaves took possession of +the fortified places, and annihilated the free population. +As regards the period of the Roman emperors, we only +know that Augustus established colonies in some places, +but the rest of the island was quite desolate, there being +only some large estates and stations for post horses. The +Regestum of pope Gregory the Great, which contains the +last accounts of Sicily before it fell into the hands of barbarians, +shows the island in this wretched condition. The +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_273">[273]</span>Roman see possesses large estates in Sicily, and the correspondence +with their stewards reveals to us the condition +of the island and the nature of such estates: we see that +the country was in a state of utter decay.</p> + +<h3 id="Sardinia"><span class="smcap">Sardinia.</span></h3> + +<p>Sardinia fully confirms the observation regarding the +identity of the physical character of countries on two sides +of the same sea. There does not exist a more senseless notion +than to imagine that rivers form the natural boundaries +between two countries; the same physical features appear on +both sides of a river: rivers are lines of communication, but +mountains separate countries from one another. The Suabian +and Bavarian races are separated by the range of the Vorarlberg. +Sardinia, in its physical structure, belongs to Africa, if +not wholly, at least its southern part as far as the mountains. +This character shows itself both in the vegetation and in the +animal life of the country: the <i>musimon</i>, an animal foreign to +all the rest of Europe, is not found anywhere out of Africa +except in Sardinia.⁠<a id="FNanchor_62" href="#Footnote_62" class="fnanchor">[62]</a> The character of the population also +is African, whence Cicero, in his speech for Scaurus, says: +<i>Afer aut Sardus sane, si ita se isti malunt nominari</i>. The +island is not, like Sicily, traversed by lofty mountains; it +is only in the northern part that the mountains reach any +considerable height; the rest is only a hilly country; many +parts of the coast are plains, extensive and low marshy +districts, which may be termed savannahs, whence great +quantities of salt are obtained there. The physical identity +with Africa manifests itself also in another very important +point: the opposite coasts of Sardinia and Africa are celebrated +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_274">[274]</span>for their banks of coral, while they are not found +near Sicily, Spain, or the Balearian islands.⁠<a id="FNanchor_63" href="#Footnote_63" class="fnanchor">[63]</a>⁠</p> + +<p>According to the most ancient tradition, the inhabitants +of Sardinia were Tyrrhenians, who appear in various +forms and personifications, in the story about Aristaeus, in +the Iolai, and in many other ways. If Tyrrhenians did +exist there, they can only have been settlers on the coasts, +for a part of the inhabitants, such as the <i>Noraces</i> and +<i>Balari</i>, were certainly of Iberian origin, and belonged to +the same race as the inhabitants of the Balearian islands. +In regard to others again, it is equally certain that +they were of Libyan origin, for they are stated to have +resembled the Berbers in language, in bodily structure, +complexion, and hair. The <i>Sardi Montani</i>, perhaps a mixture +of Iberians and Libyans, were in later times confined to +the mountains. These mountains, however, must not be +conceived as Alps, for heights of a less lofty character were +sufficient for those people to maintain themselves in them. +The highlands of Scotland also do not contain any high +mountains, they are only inaccessible, and yet the population +has maintained itself there throughout all the changes +of nations. The sea-coast was occupied at an early time by +Punic colonies, which afterwards became masters of the +island, with the exception of the interior, over which they +exercised no other influence than that which a powerful +nation on the coast always possesses over the other inhabitants. +In like manner the Dutch did not rule over the interior of +Ceylon, the prince of Candy being sovereign, though he +was obliged to comply with the wishes of the Dutch whenever +they insisted upon it. Such was the condition of +Sardinia during the second Punic war, when we meet +with Hampsicora and Hiostus as Sardinian princes. The +Punic settlements consisted for the most part of Carthaginians +mixed with Libyans, as the Carthaginians +themselves were a mixed race (Λιβυφοίνικες), or with +Greeks from Sicily and Magna Graecia. The Libyans +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_275">[275]</span>must not be conceived as negroes: in their physical features +they are not very unlike Europeans, and scarcely differ at +all from southern Europeans, so that the mixture could +take place without any difficulty. The mixture of the +Libyphoenices with the Sardinians is attested by Cicero in +an interesting fragment of his speech for Scaurus. The +Punic language accordingly predominated everywhere on +the coast, and all the known names of the Sardinians are +Punic, e.g., <i>Aris</i>, genitive <i>Arinis</i>, which is nothing else +than the Hebrew Aaron; so also Caralis and others. I said +before, that Sardinia, near the coast, has extensive low +grounds, which are, for the most part, marshy and unhealthy: +this peculiarity, (<i>aër gravis</i>), which is still the +reason of the scanty population of the island, was known +even to the historians of antiquity; the country was very +dangerous to the Roman soldiers, many of whom died there +of fevers. This we see from Tacitus’ annals⁠<a id="FNanchor_64" href="#Footnote_64" class="fnanchor">[64]</a> to have been the +case in the time of Tiberius, and such it continues to be at +the present day; in most parts it is impossible to remove +the unhealthy character of the land by cultivation.</p> + +<p>There are still many Punic remains in Sardinia; but +there also are a few Cyclopean walls, which can neither be +ascribed to the Punians nor to the Sardinians of the interior, +but must be Greek. They are minutely discussed in Millot’s +description of Sardinia, which is a bad book, but contains +valuable information about those Cyclopean walls. Timaeus +spoke of ruins which were referred to the Iolai, the alleged +ancient Greek colonists. Most of the antiquities that have +been dug out of the ground, belong to the Roman period, +but some also are Punic and have Punic inscriptions. Many +belong to the rude barbarians of the interior, especially +certain hideous and deformed idols resembling those of the +Wends and American Indians.</p> + +<p>There were no towns in the interior of Sardinia, the +mountaineers living either in villages or caves; their dress +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_276">[276]</span>consisted, as at present, of skins of the musimon (<i>mastrucae +Sardorum</i>), forming a sort of fur jackets. They were +very poor mountaineers, and the only booty the Romans +made there consisted of slaves. In a letter of pope Gregory +the Great, in his Regestum, a people of the name of +<i>Barbaricini</i> is mentioned in the interior, and this confirms +the identity of the Sardinians with the Libyans, for Barbaricini +is only a derivative form of Barbari, a name +by which the Greeks and Romans designated more particularly +the Berbers in Africa. During the Punic period +there were, properly speaking, only three towns that were +of any importance, viz., Caralis, Sulci, and Nora.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Caralis</span>, the modern Cágliari (not Cagliári, as it is +commonly pronounced, for the inhabitants themselves say +Cágliari), was the Carthaginian capital with an excellent +harbour.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Sulci</span> and <span class="smcap">Nora</span>, likewise of Phoenician origin, are +mentioned indeed in history, but were places of no particular +importance. Considerable ruins of the Roman period +are still found at Nora, and Caralis has what is called a +beautiful ancient theatre. In the accounts I have seen of +it, it is called so, but owing to the uncritical manner in +which the subject is treated, I cannot say whether it is a +real theatre or an amphitheatre.</p> + +<p>Sardinia is still the country in which European civilisation +and the change of manners resulting from it, have +taken less root than in any part of Europe: those who +regard civilisation as an evil, must consider Sardinia to be +a paradise. In no country have witches been burnt at so +recent a period, and the practice, perhaps, still prevails; the +government has not yet been able to suppress the custom +of taking revenge for bloodshed. The villages make war +upon one another, and no one can travel with safety along +the high roads, unless he purchase the protection of a party +or a village, as in the East, or else he must acquire the +rights of hospitality. According to the accounts we have +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_277">[277]</span>of the condition of the island, we may imagine it to be +something like that which certain persons call the golden +period of the middle ages. But with all this barbarism, the +greatest immorality prevails, especially among the priests. +The country is in a perfect state of anarchy, being governed +according to ancient privileges, which have never been +changed at all; the country population is in a state of complete +dissolution. When the island has an able governor, he +can keep order only by the utmost rigour, without which +he can do absolutely nothing. It is deplorable that, in these +circumstances, the administration of the island is not +entrusted to able men, the propriety of which I have often +urged. I sometimes desired natives of Sardinia to come +to me that I might examine their language, which is +very peculiar; you cannot say that it is Italian, it contains +indeed very much Latin, but much also that is quite foreign. +The Sardinian mountaineers are said to have many words +in their dialect which are radically different from all other +European languages. As much information has at present +been collected about the Berber language, my object was +to question the natives and to examine their words to see +whether they were Berber or Basque. But I could not +succeed, the people were too timid and did not come. I have +now placed my hope upon a friend, Count Castiglione, of +Milan, a great linguist, who has studied the language of +the Berbers; he may perhaps be more successful. The island, +from the earliest times, always made the impression of a wild +and ungenial country, which, poor as it was, was severely +treated by the Carthaginians, for they are said to have forbidden +the cultivation of grain, in order to compel the +Sardinians to import their supplies from Spain and Africa. +In like manner Spain, for a long time, would not tolerate +the cultivation of European grain in her American possessions, +and when at length she allowed it, she forbade the +planting of olives and vines.</p> + +<p>It was the universally established opinion among the ancients, +that Sardinia was the largest island, and larger than +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_278">[278]</span>Sicily. This opinion, though erroneous, is found in all +ancient writers, and we cannot say what may have given +rise to it.</p> + +<h3 id="Corsica"><span class="smcap">Corsica.</span></h3> + +<p>Whether <i>Corsica</i> and the Greek name Κύρνος are etymologically +connected with each other, must be left undecided; +I for my part believe, that the resemblance of the first +syllable in the two names is only accidental. Corsica was +regarded by the ancients as still more wild, uninhabitable, +unhealthy, and barbarous than Sardinia; it was inhabited +partly by Ligurians and partly by Iberians, and its inhabitants +maintained their independence till about the time of +the first Punic war, when the Carthaginians seem to have +established themselves in the island, at least near its magnificent +harbours. It would indeed be inconceivable, if they +had overlooked a harbour like that of S. Lorenzo. It is self-evident, +however, that the inhabitants of the interior +remained quite independent, for even the Genoese, though +they lived so much nearer the island, were never able +entirely to subdue them. At present it is, properly speaking, +in a state of anarchy, though it is connected with the +powerful monarchy of France; what, therefore, must have +been its condition under the Carthaginians, whose dominion +did not last long! At an earlier time the Phocaeans had +attempted to settle at Alalia (Aleria), but had not succeeded. +The Romans undertook an expedition to it as early as the +first Punic war; but the only result of it was, that they +expelled the Carthaginians, without they themselves being +able to take possession of the island. It was not till a much +later period that they subdued it, but they seem to have felt +that it was not worth while to spend so much money and +blood for the purpose of enabling themselves to remain +there.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_279">[279]</span></p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Mariana</span> and <span class="smcap">Aleria</span> are the only two towns of Corsica +deserving to be noticed; both were Roman military colonies, +the former founded by Marius, and the latter by Sulla. +At the time of the Roman emperors, Corsica, like several +islands in the Archipelago, served as a place to which condemned +persons were exiled, <i>relegatio in insulam</i>.</p> + +<p>Corsica is altogether a mountainous island, with the +exception of a narrow tract of coast, which forms unhealthy +lowlands with small rivers. The mountains are not high, +and form one of the ramifications of the Apennines, but are +very impassable and intricate.</p> + +<h3 id="Hispania"><span class="smcap">Hispania.</span></h3> + +<p>The name Hispania, as Bochart correctly states, is in all +probability of Punic origin, derived from צפן, <i>Sapan</i>, <i>Span</i>, +from which, an <i>i</i> being prefixed, <i>Ispania</i>, or <i>Hispania</i>, was +formed. In southern as well as eastern languages, the pronunciation +of an <i>s</i>, followed by a consonant, is facilitated by +prefixing a vowel, whence <i>Scipio</i>, in ordinary life, is called +<i>Iscipio</i>. You recollect the notion of the Greeks about +the four parts of the world, according to which Hesperia +was the western and Europe the northern part; in this +division, Spain was a part of Hesperia. The Greeks +called the people <i>Iberians</i>, the country <i>Iberia</i>, and the river +<i>Iberus</i>. This name of the river must have been of native +origin or have been used by the Carthaginians, for the +Romans also employed it, though they called the people +<i>Hispani</i> and the country <i>Hispania</i>. We do not know by +what name the people called themselves; it is possible that +the Basque language may throw light upon it; but in the +masterly treatise on that language by Baron Humboldt, +nothing is said about this point. Afterwards, and in the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_280">[280]</span>Acts of the Apostles, the country was called <i>Spania</i>, and it +may have borne this name generally among the Alexandrians +and in the unjustly decried Hellenistic language. The Byzantine +writers also call it so, unless they employ the +correct name Iberia.</p> + +<p>Spain is destined by nature, almost more than Italy, to +form one compact state; no one can have a doubt about this, +when looking at the three seas by which it is surrounded. +Nevertheless, however, it did not become united as one +whole till a late period, though this happened before the +time of which we have written records; for there can be no +doubt that previously it was divided into two distinct +countries. On the one side, the Pyrenees formed its natural +boundary towards Gaul (in the course of time, however, +they were crossed, and the Iberians ruled over the country +from the Garonne to the Rhone); but at an earlier period +another natural boundary line was formed by the Sierra +Morena, an extensive range of mountains, which, for a +couple of centuries, formed the boundary between the +Christian and Mahommedan parts of Spain. These same +mountains, no doubt, also separated the Iberians from the +Celts. The heights in the north of Spain, whence the Tagus, +Durius, and Minius, flow towards the sea, and whence, on +the other side, smaller rivers carry their waters towards the +Ebro, were inhabited by Celts, who are also called <i>Celtiberians</i>. +Other Celts bearing the name <i>Celtici</i> dwelt in +Algarbia and the Portuguese Estremadura, and others again +inhabited the province Entre Douro e Minho in the north +of Portugal. These three Celtic nations were quite isolated +in Spain. The Celtiberians were not pure Celts, but as even +their name indicates, a mixture of Celts and Iberians; but +the Celts in Portugal are expressly stated to have been +pure Celts. These latter attracted the attention even of the +ancients, especially of the excellent Posidonius, who made +so many correct observations, but allowed himself in this +instance to be misled. He is of opinion that the Celts had +immigrated into Spain, for he reasoned thus: as the Celts +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_281">[281]</span>could migrate into Italy and across the Danube as far as the +Dniepr, it was far less difficult for them to enter the neighbouring +country of Spain. But such isolated parts of a +nation cannot have arrived in a country by immigration; on +the contrary, the Iberians appear extending themselves and +in possession of Aquitania and Languedoc at a very early +period; how then could the Celts, not being able to maintain +the Pyrenees, have spread over the whole peninsula? +It is probable, nay almost evident, that it was the Iberians +that migrated and extended themselves, and this opinion +agrees with the most ancient traditions of the Celts in Ammianus +Marcellinus, according to which they were once +masters of all the west of Europe, but were expelled from +many parts. If we suppose that the Celts dwelt as far +as the Sierra Morena, and that the Iberians, perhaps +reinforced by their kinsmen from Africa, pressed them forward, +this supposition would account for some Celtic ruins +which are still extant, and the Celts may have capitulated +in a manner similar to that described in the book of Joshua. +As one part of England was occupied by Germans so completely +as to destroy every trace of the ancient inhabitants, +while elsewhere, as e.g., in Devonshire, the Britons, in large +numbers, lived among the Germans and became mixed with +them; so the Iberians expelled the ancient Celtic population, +wherever the nature of the country did not protect it; but +the Celts maintained themselves in the mountains between +the Tagus and the Iberus, and the Iberians only subdued +them, and then settled among them. In the course of +time the two nations became amalgamated, and thus formed +the Celtiberians, whose character, however, is essentially +Iberian.</p> + +<p>Spain may be naturally divided into four main parts. +The first is Andalusia, which is formed by the Sierra +Morena, which separates the valley of the Baetis (Guadalquivir) +from that of the Guadiana. This part is a compact +country by itself, being separated from Murcia by the heights +in the east. The second part is bounded on the south +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_282">[282]</span>by the range of Orospeda, and in the north by that of +Idubeda, which extends in an eastern direction towards the +sea. These mountains separate the river basins of the Tago +and Douro from that of the Ebro, and run at a right angle +with the Sierra Morena. This division comprises the +greater part of Valencia, Aragon, and Catalonia, that is, +the whole river basin of the Ebro. The third division consists +of the mountainous countries of Galicia, Asturias, and +Cantabria. The fourth, lastly, consists of the river basin of +the Tago. These divisions are so completely founded on the +natural features of the country, that throughout the history +of Spain they appear with perfect distinctness, and hence +they may also be taken as a guide in ancient history.</p> + +<p>Andalusia, the southernmost part, is almost identical with +ancient <i>Baetica</i>, and, as is observed even by Strabo, is a +country quite different from the rest of Spain. It has indeed +many points of resemblance with Valencia, but is at the +same time essentially different from it: it is in fact a country +of a superior character. While Valencia is flat, and well +watered, but wanting in energy, Andalusia and Granada +are countries matured by the sun in the highest degree; +they are scarcely European, but almost like tropical countries. +The eastern division, or the country of the Iberus, if we +examine its northern parts, Aragon and Catalonia, already +greatly resembles a northern country. Valencia stands in +the middle between them. The whole of the northern +division is a mighty mountainous country; the mountains +in Asturia and Biscay are very high, though they do not +reach the snow line; the highest parts are in the neighbourhood +of the sources of the Douro. The country of the +Tago is throughout a table-land, very high at its commencement, +piercingly cold and unhealthy as far as the frontier of +Portugal, and almost without any mountains; at the commencement +alone we have the ranges separating Old and +New Castile. Between the Sierra Morena and the Douro, +we have the large plain of Estremadura, which is fertile but +unhealthy, and perfectly flat; the plain of Leon is scarcely +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_283">[283]</span>inhabitable on account of its drought and barrenness; the +southern parts of Castile are productive, and the continuation +of the valley into Portugal changes its character so +much as to become extremely rich; it still contains large +plains, but the greater part is a beautiful hilly country.</p> + +<p>The principal rivers are the <i>Baetis</i> (Guadalquivir), <i>Anas</i> +(Guadiana), <i>Tagus</i> (Tago), <i>Durius</i> (Douro), <i>Minius</i> (Minho), +and in the east, the <i>Turia</i> (Guadalaviar) and the <i>Iberus</i> +(Ebro). In antiquity, Spain was particularly celebrated for +its gold and silver mines, and for the gold found in the sand +of its rivers, as in that of the Tagus, which, for this reason, +is called by poets <i>aurifer amnis</i>. The largest silver mines, +where both silver and lead were found, existed in the territory +of Carthagena in Murcia; but Asturia, too, contained +veins of precious metal. Spanish wool was not particularly +valued in antiquity, and it was not till the middle ages +that sheep-breeding was improved in Spain.</p> + +<p>Baetica produced abundance of grain, besides which the +ancients derived from other parts of Spain a kind of hemp, +called <i>spartus</i>, which was spun like hemp, and out of which +ropes and cables were manufactured.</p> + +<p>The ancients were universally of opinion that the +Spaniards, exclusive of the Celtic inhabitants and the few +Greeks and Punians who had settled there, consisted of two +nations, the <i>Turdetanians</i> and the <i>other Spaniards</i>. This +opinion originating with Artemidorus, is set forth by Strabo +so confidently, that we must believe him to have had other +and more weighty authorities than Artemidorus. They +even speak of a difference in language. For a long time, +I too entertained this opinion, because I trusted the ancients; +but I have only a very vague notion of the Iberian language. +W. von Humboldt is the only man in Europe +who has examined those languages with a true grammatical +genius, and he has declared that all the proper names from +one end of Spain to the other, absolutely belong to one and +the same language, and that the names of places among +the Cantabri, Ilergetes, Lusitani, Turdetani, etc., must all +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_284">[284]</span>be traced to roots in the Cantabrian language. To this +argument we must submit; nothing can be said against it: +in matters of this kind, the later Greeks often went very +far astray, for which reason we ought not to admit them as +authorities without great caution. But, admitting that all +names of places are Cantabrian, the opinion of the ancients +may be based upon something else, viz., the knowledge +that the nation, during its extension from the south to the +northern parts, underwent various modifications, and that +more especially those who dwelt in the north among the +conquered people, assumed a character quite different from +that of the inhabitants of Andalusia, who lived by themselves.</p> + +<p>The Turdetanians were a people possessing a considerable +degree of civilisation, for they had an alphabet of their own; +and many of their inscriptions and coins with characters +unknown to us are still extant. Many Spanish coins cannot be +explained at all, and of many the meaning is extremely +uncertain. I hope that, if the investigations are carried on +judiciously, the Libyan alphabet, which is said to be like +that of the Spaniards, will be discovered in the course of +time, and the Libyan inscriptions will be explained. Men +will then rise up like Baron von Humboldt, who will +fathom the Libyan language, and then the Spanish inscriptions +also will be read. In Cilicia, too, inscriptions have +been found, which have not yet been read, and many more +may still be discovered; but no one has as yet occupied himself +with them. These investigations, however, ought to be +undertaken with a sober mind, for otherwise they lead to +nothing. In ancient history, we often fancy we see +nothing, and yet there is much to be discovered. Lately, +e.g., an Englishman travelling in Cilicia from Adana to +Tarsus,⁠<a id="FNanchor_65" href="#Footnote_65" class="fnanchor">[65]</a> where a pass is cut along the sea-coast for the purpose +of making a road (just as above Coblenz the rocks +advance close to the river), found, as he himself told me, +a large inscription on the side of the rock in characters +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_285">[285]</span>which are quite unknown. There still are alphabets to be +deciphered and languages to be discovered; in these matters +a rich harvest may yet be made. I do not think that the +inquiries into eastern languages will ever be carried on with +any excess of zeal; but I do believe that we shall arrive at +a point where we may regard them as a step gained for +further historical investigations. When the Zend language +is once discovered, we shall be able to read the inscriptions +of Persepolis, and also those of Babylon. These things +may be likened to the horizon: the farther you advance, +the more the circle widens. Historical knowledge is as capable +of extension as physical knowledge, and great discoveries +remain yet to be made. Klopstock says: “Many laurels +are yet to be gained,” we must only strive to gain them. +The Spanish inscriptions have been treated as senselessly as +the Etruscan ones, nay, even more so. Without any point +to start from, which is not quite wanting in the Etruscan +inscriptions, these Spanish records have been explained by +means of a barbarous mixture of Greek and Latin, which +the decipherers themselves invented for their own convenience. +And such nonsense even finds its admirers! It will +indeed be difficult to explain those inscriptions with the aid +of the Basque language, for the present Basque is certainly +not the same as that spoken in the time of the Romans, +though it may not be as different as, for example, the +modern high German literary language is from that of the +earlier ages; but the difference certainly cannot be less than +that existing between the present popular dialect of Suabia +and that of the thirteenth century.</p> + +<p>The nations of Spain presented the greatest differences in +their manners, for they formed compact nations, and much +closer unions than either in Greece or in Italy; but we +cannot say what were the causes which kept up this union. +Thus much is clear, that during the historical period most +of the Iberian nations had their kings, whom the Romans +call <i>reguli</i>. The Romans greatly respected the Spaniards +on account of their courage and determination, but what +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_286">[286]</span>distinguishes them most, is their attachment to their chiefs, +which was even stronger among the Iberians than among +the Celts; it was quite common with the followers of a +chief to make away with themselves, if he fell in battle, +that they might serve him in his future state. Isolated +instances of cities being defended with desperate courage +also occur among other nations of antiquity, as in the case +of Abydos and Petelia; but in Spain this was the general +rule: the towns never surrendered either in their wars +against Carthage or against Rome, and when they could no +longer resist the force of hunger, they devoted themselves +to destruction. The same obstinacy in defending their +towns appears in the middle ages, and in modern times, as, +for example, at Saragoza and Gerona: nothing in modern +history can be compared with this, except the defence of +Missolunghi.</p> + +<p>Another peculiarity is, that the Spaniards, except the +Celtiberians, had in antiquity the same weakness which still +characterises them. I allude to the complete alienation and +the great exasperation between the several nations; they show +the same inveterate national hatred which still exists, e.g., +between the Castilians and Aragonians. I was once acquainted +with an Aragonian, who, though otherwise an honourable +man, told me, that it would be quite impossible for him to +form a friendship with a Castilian. The same is at present +the case in Italy, but in former times people of the same +race, such as the Sabellians, often faithfully kept together; +but the Spanish nations never appear united. It is equally +remarkable that the Spaniards, again excepting the Celtiberians, +though excellent defenders of their towns, are good +for nothing as soldiers in the field. The Spanish militia +defended itself behind its walls, but did not persevere in the +field; the Samnites, on the other hand, are the very reverse, +for they are by no means distinguished in their sieges. In +Condé’s history of the Arabs, a general, in his despatch to +the Kaliph, says of the Spaniards: on horseback they are +eagles, in the defence of their towns, lions, but in the field +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_287">[287]</span>they are women. Such they were in the wars against the +Arabs, and such also in those against Napoleon: they +never fought a battle in the open field that did not bring +disgrace upon them; and the same men, who, in their towns, +would bury themselves under their ruins, rather than listen +to a word about capitulation, took to flight without any +necessity. The Celtiberians, on the other hand, appear in +a very favourable light; and the Cantabrians and Asturians, +too, defended themselves in their mountains almost as in +fortresses.</p> + +<p>All Spain is full of towns.</p> + +<p>Modern Andalusia, the country of the Turdetani, claims +a very ancient civilisation, for its inhabitants had a literature +and laws composed in verses, and are also said to have had +a kind of historical books.</p> + +<p>In the traditions of the Greeks, Iberia belongs to Hesperia, +and their earliest information about it refers to +<i>Tartessus</i>, which was visited at an early period by the +Phocaeans. Its situation is beyond a doubt; it is justly +placed in the neighbourhood of Seville, near the mouth of +the Baetis; but whether it was a town or a country, whether +as a town it was different from Hispalis, or whether it was +identical with ancient Hispalis, these are questions which +we can answer only by conjectures.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Gades</span> (<i>Gadir</i>, in Phoenician and Hebrew “a fence”) is +the most ancient settlement of which we have any accurate +information. In the Heracleae, the island on which Gades +was situated was called <i>Erythea</i>, and the ancients say that +it consisted of two islands, a circumstance which has caused +much difficulty to modern geographers, as it was impossible +to find the two islands. But no Andalusian would be puzzled +by it. Cadiz, together with Leon, now certainly forms +one island, but originally Cadiz was an island by itself, and +its present union with Isla de Leon is the consequence of a +causeway, which was made at a time unknown to us, from +Gades to the larger island; this artificial causeway is discernible +even at the present day. Gades was a Phoenician +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_288">[288]</span>settlement, independent of Carthage, and as truly Punic as +the latter city itself. But when the prosperity of Carthage +rose higher and higher, and when, at the same time, that of +the other Phoenician colonies was sinking more and more, +then Gades also was obliged to acknowledge the supremacy +of Carthage. Nothing is more natural and more in accordance +with human passions and feelings, than that this Punic city +was more hostile to the Carthaginians than any other place +that had been subdued by them; we cannot, therefore, be +surprised at finding that, in the course of the second Punic +war, its hatred of Carthage led it to declare in favour of +the Romans, as Utica did afterwards. Hence Gades obtained +very favourable terms from the Romans, and remained a +privileged city until the time of the emperors; afterwards +it received the Roman franchise. Cadiz is one of those +places which experienced scarcely any reverses of fortune +in ancient times; and, with the exception of the barbarous +invasion of the Arabs, I do not know that Cadiz was ever +visited by a single misfortune.</p> + +<p>Part of the coast of Granada was likewise occupied by +Punians, for <span class="smcap">Malacca</span> (the royal city) also was a Punic +colony. Before the dominion of the Carthaginians, the +inhabitants were called <i>Bastuli</i>. Here, as well as in Africa, +the facility with which the Phoenicians became amalgamated +with foreign nations is very striking.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Carthago</span> (the modern <i>Carthagena</i>, properly <i>Cartha +Chadta</i> or New Town) was the real capital of the Carthaginians +in Spain, and its name is as common as the Greek +Neapolis. Notwithstanding its importance and strength, +the town was not as large as we are inclined to imagine; +at the time of its capture by Scipio, it appears small +both in population and circumference, if we compare it +with other maritime cities and capitals. It was founded +by Hamilcar Barcas, who first established the dominion of +the Carthaginians in Spain, which, however, was not of +long duration. Though Gades and the towns on the coast +of Granada were Punic, we must not, on that account +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_289">[289]</span>imagine that, previously to the time of Hamilcar Barcas, +the Carthaginians had a province there. Their influence, +indeed, was great even before; their commerce was extensive +and lucrative, the Spanish mines may have been chiefly +worked by Punians, and Spain was the recruiting place for +their armies; but no part of Spain was a Carthaginian +province before the end of the first Punic war. It was the +great idea of Hamilcar Barcas richly to indemnify his +country for the loss of Sardinia and Sicily, an idea which +no one was better qualified to realise than he, by paralysing +the Romans with determination, cunning, and skill. The +lately-discovered precious fragments from Diodorus throw +great light upon the admirable manner in which he carried +this plan into effect. Turdetania was subdued first, Hannibal +then carried the war almost as far as Salamanca, and the modern +New Castile and Valencia were subdued by him. These +acquisitions, however, must not be regarded as permanent +conquests, the object of the Carthaginians being rather to +terrify the Spaniards and to accustom them to a feeling of +dependence. The Carthaginians were otherwise hard and +hated masters, but the great Hamilcar, his great successor +Hasdrubal, and the great sons of Hamilcar, founded the Carthaginian +dominion in Spain in such a manner as to secure +to Carthage the attachment of the natives, a point in which +the Romans never succeeded. Much depended upon circumstances, +the Carthaginians, e.g., were less rigorous in +observing the connubium than the Romans, and Hannibal +himself married a Spanish woman of Castulo, which shows +what liberty was allowed in this respect: when the commander-in-chief +of a province did this, we may easily imagine +in what manner persons of inferior rank acted. The Romans +had no connubium at all with the natives.</p> + +<p>If we proceed to the interior of Andalusia, we find the +valley of the Baetis to be one of the richest and most fertile +countries in Europe; it is still a paradise, and will ever +remain so, in spite of the devastations of war and the worst +government. I know, from an eye-witness, who saw the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_290">[290]</span>country in the years 1810 and 1811, that its prosperity and +high state of cultivation were altogether unchanged, and +quite as good as before.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Hispalis</span> (the Arabs call it <i>Iabilia</i>, whence the modern +name <i>Sevilla</i>) was the ancient capital of those parts. It +does not act a prominent part in history, and is not often +mentioned; but we know that, notwithstanding the greatness +of Gades, it had its own importance, as sea ships sailed up as +far as Hispalis. In the time of the Romans, it seems to +have risen still higher in consequence of various favours +conferred upon it.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Corduba</span> was the real Roman capital of the province; it +was, no doubt, an ancient Spanish town with a Roman +colony, which bears the strange name of <i>Colonia Patricia +Corduba</i>. It is as impossible for us to understand what +circumstance gave rise to this name, as it is to determine +the time at which the colony was founded. It was not a +military colony, nor can it have been founded before the +year of the city 641, in which year⁠<a id="FNanchor_66" href="#Footnote_66" class="fnanchor">[66]</a> Narbo, the first Roman +colony out of Italy, was founded. This event caused great +sensation, for until then all attempts to establish colonies in +foreign countries had failed. Corduba, therefore, cannot +have been founded before the seventh century; and it perhaps +belongs to the time when Metellus had the command +in Baetica. Corduba is destined by nature to be a princely +city; and it was the centre of Roman civilisation and literature +in those parts. It was not only the native place of the +Senecas, but it was so completely a Latin town, that <i>poetae +Cordubenses</i> were spoken of even in Cicero’s time; they +were not indeed mentioned with praise, but it was not their +language that was censured; they were deficient only in +manner and in skill. In the history of literature, Corduba is +remarkable as the native place of the family of the Senecas; +it afterwards retained the same importance which it had +during the first century. It passed from the hands of the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_291">[291]</span>Romans into those of the Goths, and lastly into those of the +Arabs; but it is always honourably spoken of as a distinguished +city.</p> + +<p>If I had time to dwell longer on this subject, I might +relate to you much that is of great interest about Baetica; +but for the present I will select only two localities.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Saltus Castulonensis</span>, leading to Castulo, is exactly +the same road across the Sierra Morena, which leads to +Andujar. In the history of the Roman wars, it is very important, +and again became so in 1808, when General +Dupont was obliged to surrender there.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Munda</span> was situated in the mountains of Granada. It +seems strange to us, that the war between Caesar and the +sons of Pompey was decided in those parts, so near the +coast at the extreme end of Spain; but if we consider the +nature of the locality, we cease to wonder: the country is +strong and fertile at the same time, so that the armies were +not in danger of suffering from want of provisions. This +shews that the sons of Pompey were wise in establishing +themselves there.</p> + +<p>The inhabitants of Baetica were called by the Romans +<i>Turduli</i> and <i>Turdetani</i>. People generally distinguish between +these two names, and I believe that Strabo did so too; +but I think that they are only intended to indicate slight +shades of difference between two people of the same race.</p> + +<p>The country of the <i>Edetani</i> (the modern province of +Valencia) had <span class="smcap">Valentia</span> for its capital. You remember +my mentioning the fact that Roman names of places were +derived from verbs of which the meaning was a favourable +omen. Valentia is an instance of this, and another town of +the same name existed in Italy. Other names of the same +kind are Pollentia, Potentia, Florentia, Vincentia, Faventia, +etc. The town of Valentia was a Roman settlement; I do +not believe that it was a colony, but it must have been +founded at an early time, for it is certainly mentioned in +the war of Sertorius. It is situated on the river Turia, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_292">[292]</span>which is celebrated in antiquity for the glorious but unsuccessful +battle of Sertorius.</p> + +<p>The ancient town of <span class="smcap">Saetabis</span>, one of the largest manufacturing +places of Spain, was situated in the same district; +a very fine kind of linen was made there from flax grown +in the country.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Saguntus</span> or <span class="smcap">Saguntum</span> (both forms are supported by +authority), was situated to the north of Valentia. It is +well-known that this place was the occasion of the second +Punic war, and Polybius in speaking of it makes a beautiful +and correct observation respecting the difference between +the immediate occasion and the cause of a war. Saguntum +was the occasion, but certainly not the cause of the war. It +is very singular that not only Appian, whose geographical +ignorance of Spain surpasses everything, but even Roman +authors almost universally assume Saguntum to have been +situated on the left side of the Ebro; this, however, is a +mistake, for it was situated on its right side, and at a considerable +distance from it to the south. According to one +tradition, it was a colony of Ardea, that is, a Tyrrhenian +settlement and it is very probable that there may have +been a Tyrrhenian admixture; but according to others it +was an Achaean colony of Zacynthos: the resemblance +of the name was too tempting not to suggest the derivation. +The Tyrrhenians are often called Achivi, and as +Zacynthos was Achivan, both things were mixed together +in this manner. It is much more credible that Saguntum +was a colony of Ardea, founded at a time when the Ardeatans +were great and powerful. Taraco, on the opposite +side of the river, is likewise said to have been a Tyrrhenian +town. But admitting that the Saguntines were originally +Tyrrhenians, they certainly, in the course of time, became +complete Spaniards, as many other colonists identified themselves +with the natives; and the Saguntines, against whom +Hannibal fought, were Spaniards. It would lead too far +here to speak of the fate of Saguntum, and of the uncritical +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_293">[293]</span>treatment of its history by Livy, and his strange misconceptions. +Livy, in this part of his work, probably followed +Caelius Antipater, and thereby spoiled the beginning of his +third decad, which is otherwise so excellent: his account of +Saguntum is a childish exaggeration, and well suited to a +rhetorician like Caelius. Saguntum was restored by the +Romans, and remained a considerable town under the +empire; large ruins of an amphitheatre still exist near +Murviedro.</p> + +<p>We now come to the Iberus, into which several rivers +from the north discharge their waters; one of these, the +<i>Sicoris</i> (Segre), is a river of some importance. The Romans +acquired influence and formed connections in the country +between the Ebro and the Pyrenees about the same time when +Hamilcar was actively engaged in the south to extend the +power of Carthage; and the inhabitants of Catalonia, at +least those on the coast, had at that time already submitted +to the Romans. As the power of the Carthaginians was +spreading in Spain, the Catalonians thought they could +protect themselves only by applying to some distant state +which had no armies in the neighbourhood, which levied +no taxes, and to which they had only to furnish troops in +case of need. <span class="smcap">Taraco</span>, properly the capital of all Spain, +was the chief city in fair Catalonia throughout the Roman +period; and from it <i>Hispania Taraconensis</i>, which embraced +the greater part of Spain, derived its name. After the +time of the Hannibalian war there were two <i>Hispaniae</i>, and +one praetor resided at Carthagena, and the other at Taraco. +It was in its character of a capital that Taraco had a temple +of Roma and Augustus. It was a wealthy place, but afterwards +declined, and in the middle ages it was eclipsed by +the neighbouring—</p> + +<p><i>Barcelona</i>, which, however, is not mentioned during the +period of the Roman republic, but only under the empire. +Its ancient name is <span class="smcap">Barcino</span>; the termination <i>no</i> or <i>ino</i> is +of common occurrence, as for example, in Ruscino, and +seems to have been a dialectic peculiarity of those parts. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_294">[294]</span>Barcelona, has an excellent harbour, and its situation is very +strong on account of the mountain which rises above the +city. At the time of the Visigoths, it surpassed Taragona +in importance, but in ancient history it does not occur.</p> + +<p>On a more distant part of the coast, we meet with two Greek +settlements, <span class="smcap">Emporiae</span>, from which the modern Ampurias +has its name, and <span class="smcap">Rhode</span>. The latter is called a Rhodian +colony; but Rhode, as well as Emporiae, was probably a +colony of Massilia, by whose support it was maintained.</p> + +<p>The country between the Ebro and the Pyrenees was in +ancient times inhabited by many small tribes, as the Ilergetes, +Lacetani, Cosetani, etc.⁠<a id="FNanchor_67" href="#Footnote_67" class="fnanchor">[67]</a>⁠</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Ilerda</span>, the modern Lerida on the Sicoris, is a town of +great historical importance in the interior of Catalonia. It +is remarkable in the history of Rome, and especially that of +Caesar, who there compelled Afranius and Petreius to +capitulate. These events, which are interesting in themselves, +also show how an extraordinary man overcomes the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_295">[295]</span>most difficult circumstances, and gains advantages even +where all chances seem to be against him.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Osca</span> (now Huesca), an ancient town farther inland, in +Aragon, was, for a long time the head-quarters of the great +Sertorius. It must have been a town of great importance +to Spain, for the standard of the Spanish coinage is called +<i>argentum Oscense</i>.</p> + +<p>We have thus rapidly passed along the whole coast from +the Baetis to the Pyrenees; but in the valley of the Ebro I +have still to notice <span class="smcap">Caesaraugusta</span> (Saragoza). Spain is +the real country of the great and flourishing military +colonies of the Romans; Gaul had but few of them, such as +Cologne, which, however, was of a mixed character, as +Germans there dwelt together with the veterans. Cologne +and Lyons were national towns rather than real military +colonies of the Romans; but those in Spain were pure +military colonies, differing from those of Italy in the fact +that the latter, with the exception of Placentia and Cremona, +were established in towns which had existed before, whereas +those in Spain consisted of newly-built towns. These foundations +of towns belong to the age of Augustus and his +successors. Augustus evidently had a twofold object in +view, first to reward his veterans, and secondly to Romanise +the Spaniards. The population in those parts had been +almost annihilated during the unfortunate wars, and hence +Augustus sent out whole legions to establish themselves +there. In this manner arose <i>Emerita Augusta</i>, the modern +Merida, which must have been an immensely large town, +for it contained the veterans of three legions. He gave +them extensive estates, so that the territory of the town +must have been a whole province, and the ancient inhabitants +could not possibly till their lands. The veterans +became the lords of the soil. Caesaraugusta was a town of +this kind. Augustus was a distinguished man, whatever +we may think of him; in regard to intellect and talent we +may rate him very low, and I believe that he even deserves +to be ranked lower than is generally done; but he was a ruler +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_296">[296]</span>of great ability; and the fact that the time in which he lived +was deplorable and full of confusion, must not induce us to be +unjust towards him. The age in which he lived was morally +bad, but the cause of this lay in the period which preceded +it, just as the horrors of the French revolution must be set +down to the account of those who had the power in their +hands before it broke out; had these men been better, the +ferment of the dregs of the people would have met with +quite a different resistance. But the whole fabric was +rotten and in a state of dissolution. In like manner the age +of Augustus was bad, because it was the offspring of a bad +and corrupt period. It was as impossible to save the Roman +republic, as it was to restore the republic of Florence after +the reign of Alexander de Medici. The men who had +conspired against Caesar may have been the best and +noblest, but they were extremely unwise, they ought to +have taken into account the actual circumstances. Alcmaeon, +the profound Pythagorean, says, that men perish, +if they do not understand how to fit the beginning to the +end.⁠<a id="FNanchor_68" href="#Footnote_68" class="fnanchor">[68]</a> This is very frequently the case in history; and +hence the noblest endeavours often lead to unfortunate +results. The regulations of Augustus for the government +of the state were, for the most part, extremely praiseworthy. +I do not mean to say that it was his object to lead the +nation to what is good and noble, or to ennoble their +motives for action—in this he, like many other statesmen, +had no faith—but he wanted to prepare for his subjects’ +security an undisturbed existence, and outward prosperity; +and in this respect his efforts were well directed, and he did +not regard the Romans as slaves. In like manner, his regulations +concerning the provinces were very rational, and his +colonies, among which Caesaraugusta has immortalised +his name more than any other, are proofs of the same +wisdom.</p> + +<p><i>Emerita Augusta</i>, <i>Pax Augusta</i> (Badajoz), <i>Pax Julia</i> (Beja, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_297">[297]</span>in southern Portugal) are similar colonies in the interior. +These are the principal ones, for there are several more, +which are less celebrated. Vespasian afterwards continued +the same system, whence several Spanish places +have the surname <i>Flavia</i>. They were, however, no longer +absolutely Roman colonies, but Spanish towns upon which +he engrafted military colonies. This lasted until the second +century, and I remember no colony of a more recent +date than the reign of Trajan. <i>Legio</i>, the modern Leon, +was likewise such a military colony; even at present its +walls remind us of the form of a Roman camp, and all +military colonies of the Romans regularly had the form of +a camp.</p> + +<p>We shall pass through the country from west to east, +but can consider it only in masses. The westernmost +people were the <span class="smcap">Lusitanians</span>, occupying a country somewhat +different in extent from the modern kingdom of +Portugal, for it did not extend so far north, and in the +south it did not go beyond the frontier of Algarbia, but in +the east, it extended much farther into Spain. The Lusitanians +were the most civilised among all the Spanish +nations. They do not seem to have been subdivided, but +to have formed one compact state with one national government, +which, however, does not appear to have had a high +degree of intensity, as is proved by the history of Viriathus. +At the time when the Romans made themselves masters of +Spain, the Lusitanians distinguished themselves by their +perseverance and firmness; their valour is displayed in the +great undertaking of Viriathus for their liberty. Every +one knows the cruelty and faithlessness of Servius Galba, +who induced them to enter into a capitulation with the +Romans, and then treacherously massacred the greater part +of them.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Olisipo</span> was even then the most important town in +Lusitania. We may assume, without any hesitation, that, +under the Roman emperors, the country enjoyed a far +higher degree of prosperity than at present; Spain, on the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_298">[298]</span>other hand, on its first appearance in history, is in a state of +great disorganisation. Owing to its situation, Olisipo was +a great emporium even under the Romans.</p> + +<p>We pass over other Lusitanian places: I have already +told you that two Celtic tribes dwelt in the country of +Portugal, the <i>Celtici</i> in the south near the frontier of +Algarbia, and the <i>Celtae</i> in the north between the Douro +and Minho.</p> + +<p>The <span class="smcap">Oretani</span> occur on the Orospeda in Spain proper, +north of the Sierra Morena; but I will not mention all the +tribes, I shall confine myself to two which act a prominent +part in ancient history, and the districts of which must be +known in order to understand the campaigns of Hannibal: +I allude to the <span class="smcap">Carpetani</span> and <span class="smcap">Vaccaei</span>. The former +dwelt about the Tagus; although it is not expressly said, +that <i>Toletum</i> (Toledo) was their capital, we must in all +probability suppose it to have been their central town. +This town, owing to its central position, is destined by +nature to be a capital, and such we find it to have been +under the Goths. In the time of the Romans also it must +have been a place of great importance, though it is not +mentioned as the seat of the praetor: this is one of the +obscure points in the history of the fourth and fifth centuries. +Afterwards, in the time of the Moors, it was the +residence of the governors and kaliphs, and subsequently of +the kings of Castile, until the seat of government was +absurdly transferred to Madrid, for Toledo has a much +more splendid situation in a far more healthy district. The +<i>Carpetani</i> (Καρπήσιοι) act a prominent part in the third +book of Polybius and in the twenty-first of Livy, for they +offered a brave resistance to the Carthaginians during their +progress towards the interior of the country.</p> + +<p>The <i>Vaccaei</i> dwelt on the Durius, and <i>Salmantica</i>, the +modern Salamanca, was their capital. This was the farthest +point to which Hannibal advanced in his campaigns. The +Vaccaei, in their struggle against the Romans, appear as +one of the most heroic nations.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_299">[299]</span></p> + +<p>All these tribes were completely Iberian; but further +east we reach <span class="smcap">Idubeda</span>, the mountains of Soria, a ramification +of the Pyrenees between the Tagus and Durius on +the one hand, and the Iberus on the other, and extending +as far as the Sierra Morena, which separates Aragon from +Castile as completely as the Pyrenees separate Spain from +France. The language of the Aragonese is Provençal and +quite foreign to the Castilian. Those mountains were +inhabited by four tribes, which are of great celebrity in +Roman history under the common name of the <span class="smcap">Celtiberians</span>. +The most important among them are the <i>Aruaci</i> +or <i>Arevaci</i> and <i>Berones</i>; and their chief town was <span class="smcap">Numantia</span>, +which has acquired imperishable fame in history. +The tribe to which Numantia belonged was insignificant, +and the town is an instance of a phenomenon which is otherwise +of rare occurrence in Spain, namely, it was independent +of the tribe to which it belonged. I have already stated, +that the Celtiberians must be regarded as Iberians, who +subdued the Celts, though the latter maintained themselves +in the country. The Iberian character of pride and perseverance +shows itself most strikingly in them, because they +were the masters there, and in a most favourable situation, +living among a subject population upon which they could +devolve the burdens of life. However much accurate historical +knowledge may be lost, yet it is certain that the +Celtiberians are one of the most respectable nations of +antiquity, <i>non sine laude nominandi</i>. During the Carthaginian +period, they preserved their liberty unimpaired; but +when the Romans systematically undertook the subjugation +of Spain, they first came in contact with the Celtiberians, +who had formerly been on terms of friendship with them, +and had served in their armies as mercenaries. But when +attempts were made upon their liberty, they refused to +listen to any terms of submission. They were intelligent +enough to look upon the war with the Romans as a great +misfortune; when, therefore, Tib. Gracchus, the father of +the illustrious tribunes, and a son of the Tib. Gracchus +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_300">[300]</span>who had fallen at Beneventum in the Hannibalian war, had +the supreme command in Spain, the Celtiberians, having +confidence in his honesty, concluded peace with him on +terms which the weaker people could accept without disgracing +itself, and by which their existence was not so far +degraded as to make death preferable. They observed the +peace conscientiously, but not so the Romans, who, at last, +under the second Scipio, succeeded in destroying Numantia: +that victory is a degradation to Scipio as much as, in the +reign of Tiberius, it was a degradation to the men who +were obliged to lend their names to pass disgraceful <i>senatus +consulta</i>.</p> + +<p>Some of the Celtiberian towns were protected only by +their situation; this was the case at Numantia, though +certainly not with any reference to Sparta on principle, for +as the town had no more than 4000 armed men, such a +principle would have been ill suited to them, and it would +not assuredly have been any degradation to protect the +town by means of fortifications.</p> + +<p>The Celtiberians, that is, the remnants of the devoted +nation, afterwards re-appear in a remarkable manner in the +time of Sertorius. They were not all united in their +attachment to him, a singular proof of the clear and +rational manner in which those Spaniards viewed their +altered circumstances, although they had very great men +for their leaders. They did not look backwards, and their +object was neither to restore the condition of independence +which had existed previously to the Hannibalian war and +which it was impossible to revive, nor yet absolutely to +repel the Romans. They readily availed themselves of the +presence of Sertorius for the purpose of forming themselves +into an Hispano-Latin nation and of acquiring a national +existence, which promised a development from the actual +circumstances. This is a very interesting fact, and deserves +to be well pondered over: after great changes of circumstances, +light sometimes dawns on men; they do not look +back into the past, but set before them a fixed object suited +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_301">[301]</span>to their circumstances, and do not follow any visionary +schemes. Thus the Celtiberians were now ready to do +what their ancestors a hundred years before would not have +done. But they did not succeed. The fall of Sertorius and +the victory of the Romans were things over which they had +no control; Providence here decided the issue, and the +failure does not prove that their undertaking was not wisely +calculated.</p> + +<p>There now only remains the northern region of Spain, +which extends from the western sea to the Gallic frontier. +We there meet with three principal tribes, viz., the <span class="smcap">Callaici</span> +(in modern Galicia), the <span class="smcap">Astures</span> (in Asturia and +the greater part of Leon), and the <span class="smcap">Cantabri</span> (in Biscay in +its greatest extent). These three nations had many things +in common both in their national character and in that of +the country they inhabited; though this circumstance does +not exclude essential differences. The Callaici were the +first that were conquered by the Romans, which was accomplished +as early as the commencement of the seventh +century, by Dec. Brutus, hence surnamed Callaicus. But +still his campaign did not produce any permanent results in +regard to the occupation of Spain, the consequences being +scarcely more lasting than those of the campaign of Domitius +Ahenobarbus on the Elbe. The Astures and Cantabri, +on the other hand, maintaining their independence much +longer, were not subdued until the period from the year 14 +to 10 <span class="allsmcap">B.C.</span>, or 740 of the city. Augustus himself conducted +the war against those little mountain tribes for three or +four years, employing all the resources of the empire which +could at that time send hundreds of thousands into the +field. Hence we cannot think of the national efforts of +those Spanish nations without feeling a high degree of +respect for them. But as the Saxons maintained themselves +after the cruel butcheries of Charlemagne, and as the +Westphalians and Lower Saxons are among the most unchanged +of the tribes of Germany, and developed themselves +with greater freedom and national individuality than the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_302">[302]</span>nations of southern Germany; so the Cantabri and Astures +preserved their independence and nationality in spite of the +Roman conquest. The Astures, however, did not succeed +so completely as the Cantabri; Romans must have settled +among the former, which led them to adopt the Roman +language, whereas the Cantabri at this day speak the ancient +Spanish language, and their present institutions, which have +no doubt grown out of their very ancient customs, might +certainly throw light upon their ancient laws and institutions. +But unfortunately, so far as I know, satisfactory +information about these matters is not to be found anywhere. +The Cantabri were afterwards called <i>Vascones</i>, and +in our days Basque. The very name of Astorga (<i>Asturica</i>), +the ancient capital of the country, shews that Asturia comprised +the greater part of Leon.</p> + +<p>The Romans divided Spain into <i>Hispania citerior</i> and +<i>ulterior</i>, which was quite a matter of accident, as after the +Hannibalian war they had two armies and two praetors in +Spain. Gradually Roman settlements were formed, the +armies remained there for a long time, and the soldiers +married native women. Hence, as is the case in India +through the English troops, a half cast people arose, who +were foreign to the Romans, but regarded themselves as +Latin, and gradually acquired various kinds of privileges. +This gave rise to the foundation of the town of <span class="smcap">Italica</span>, +where the sons of those Romans assembled; Valentia probably +arose in the same manner. Until the time of +Galba, the Spaniards, with the exception of the Roman +colonists, were subjects, but that emperor conferred on some +of them, and Vespasian upon all, the <i>jus Latii</i>, in the later +sense, in which Pompeius Strabo had conferred it upon the +Transpadani.⁠<a id="FNanchor_69" href="#Footnote_69" class="fnanchor">[69]</a>⁠</p> + +<p>Iberian tribes dwelt not only on the south, but also on +the north of the Pyrenees. Caesar, whom Tacitus justly +calls <i>summus auctorum</i>, in fact, calls the Aquitanians a +people of the Iberian race. They inhabited the modern +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_303">[303]</span>Guienne, extending but little beyond the Garonne. It is +still doubtful whether all the tribes south of the Garonne +were Iberians; the Bituriges in Burdigala can scarcely have +belonged to them. It was probably not a compact Spanish +population, the basis was Celtic. Hence Ausonius speaks +of Burdigala as a Celtic town, for in one passage he mentions +Celtic as the native language of its inhabitants. In +the districts immediately bordering upon Spain, however, +the Spaniards undoubtedly predominated, and in fact, even +at the present day the Basque language is spoken at +Bayonne, and as far as Bearn.</p> + +<h3 id="Gallia"><span class="smcap">Gallia.</span></h3> + +<p>Caesar represents Gaul as bounded by the Pyrenees, the +sea, the Alps and the Rhine. This unfortunate statement +about the Rhine has been appealed to as a reason for separating +from Germany the country in which we are living, +an idea which has taken root in the heads of many men, +and is still frequently expressed, especially by Frenchmen, +without paying any regard to the fact that this country was +inhabited by Germans. The expression of Caesar is nothing +else than a loose definition of what in his time was regarded +as Gaul, and without making any pretensions to accuracy. +For when he says that Gaul consists of Aquitania, Celtica, +and Belgium, he employs the name in much too extensive a +sense, according to the custom of deriving the name of a +country from that of its inhabitants, for Aquitania was +Iberian and did not belong to it. On the other hand, the +greater part of Britain and Hibernia was likewise inhabited +by Gauls, nay, in Caesar’s time, they extended over the +south of Germany, while at a somewhat earlier period, in +the time of the Cimbri, they not only were in possession of +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_304">[304]</span>southern Germany and Lombardy, but also of Bohemia and +Pannonia, down to the very heart of Thrace, the country +of the Ukraine, beyond the river Dniepr, and even a +portion of Asia Minor. The Tectosagae, in Asia Minor, +were as much Gauls as those on the Rhone. The name +Gaul, therefore, is something purely accidental. The Latin +terminology, which at an earlier period correctly made +Picenum the frontier of Gaul, is in this instance very incorrect +in including Belgium as a part of Gaul, whereas it +ought to have been called Cimbria, for the Belgae were +essentially different from the Gauls.</p> + +<p>What I have here said about the nature of Gaul, is +intended as a justification of Eratosthenes, a great man, who +has been unjustly censured by Strabo, another very distinguished +man, whom I never mention without gratitude and +respect. Eratosthenes assigned to the Celts a vast extent +of country: he disliked the common names of the parts of +the earth because they appeared to him erroneous, and +instead of them, he makes other great divisions, calling the +north-west of Europe Celtica; he then places the Scythians +in the north, and between these two, the Celto-Scythians +(of course according to the inscription of Olbia, from which +we learn that Celts had settled in the Ukraine),⁠<a id="FNanchor_70" href="#Footnote_70" class="fnanchor">[70]</a> in the +east, the Indians, and again, between the Indians and +Scythians, the Indo-Scythians; then the Ethiopians, and +between these latter and the Indians, probably the Indo-Ethiopians, +though they are not mentioned. Now, Strabo +censures this view of the great extension of the Celts; and +modern authors, who have written on the subject, have +quietly repeated the censure, although it is quite unjust. +We must not imagine that France alone was inhabited by +Celts; but they occupied the extent of country described in +their tradition, from the Sierra Morena, almost from the +mouth of the Baetis, that is, from Lusitania in Spain to the +country about the Tanais in the East; I do not, of course, +here specify any particular time, but I speak in general.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_305">[305]</span></p> + +<p>To confound the Germans with the Celts is an error, +which, though now less common than formerly, still makes +its appearance here and there. I can speak positively on +this subject, because I am to some extent acquainted with +the Celtic language, and because, in my earlier years, I +spent some time in Scotland, where I became intimately +acquainted with the language spoken in the Highlands. I +have a distinct recollection of it, and know a great many +of its words. I can positively assert, that the grammar has +not the least resemblance to the German; its conjugation +and declension by changes at the beginning of words is +quite foreign to the German dialects. If, e.g., a word in +the nominative begins with <i>m</i>, it forms the genitive by a +<i>w</i>; conjugation is effected by auxiliary verbs, but the +system is quite different from ours. It is true that a considerable +number of words are German or Scandinavian; +but these can be recognised at once as foreign importations, +for they have no connection with Celtic roots. The Highlanders +are not a wild people, and I am very fond of them, +but they are unpolished. Their foreign words are for the +most part such as denote domestic furniture or anything +which presupposes a state of civilisation above the merest +elements, such as a chair, a bench, and the like; words of +this kind are generally of German or Scandinavian origin. +Such foreign words can very easily be recognised in all +languages. Many words, on the other hand, have a manifest +affinity with Latin; this is undeniable; but I do not by +any means wish to intimate that they are imported, for how +could they have got into the language of the Scottish +Highlanders? I have said in my history, that there are +affinities between languages spoken by different nations, +without their being genealogically traceable to one nation, +and without one nation being descended from the other; +but they stand to each other in the relation of varieties +which, owing to certain common peculiarities, belong to +the same species. Such is the case between the Celtic and +Latin. Pliny calls the polar sea <i>mare Cronium</i>, which +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_306">[306]</span>English and Scotch scholars explain quite simply and correctly +as <i>mar Cronni</i>, that is, Frozen sea.</p> + +<p>The Celts, so far as we can trace them, differ immensely +from the Germans not only in their language, but in their +religion, their manners, and, in short, in everything. About +sixty or seventy years ago, the false belief in their identity +was so general in Germany, that no one entertaining a +different opinion would have been listened to, although the +testimonies of the ancients are clear, and no reader of +Caesar can believe him to be in favour of the identity. The +same is the case with Tacitus, who distinguishes the German, +Gallic, and Pannonian languages.</p> + +<p>Another erroneous opinion, though less general, is, that, +the Gauls and Belgae were in reality one nation, or at least +that the Belgae were a mixture of Gauls and Germans. It +is true that some support of this opinion may be found in +the best ancient writers, but those who maintain it confound +that which is accidental with that which is general. I will +not doubt that the inhabitants of northern Belgium and of +the Netherlands are mixed; the mixture,however, does not +consist of Gauls, but of Cymri and Germans. We must not +in any way conceive the relation between Gauls and Belgae, +as if the former were pure, and the latter mixed Celts. +Gauls and Belgae exist at this day, and are different in +language and names: under the name of <i>Gael</i>, we find +them in Ireland and the Highlands of Scotland, and under +that of <i>Cymri</i> or <i>Bolgs</i> in Wales and Britany. Formerly +they were much more widely spread, all over the west of +England, from Cornwall to Cumberland, and the Picts also +belonged to them; they called themselves <i>Bolgs</i> or <i>Firbolgs</i> +(from <i>fir</i>, a man, <i>Belgian men</i>). This nation is confounded +by the ancients with the Gauls, and in the accounts of their +emigration they are simply called Galli, Γαλάται; they +were however, Cymri, not indeed exclusively, but at least +chiefly. This is clear even from the fact that, both in Macedonia +and Italy, their king is called Brennus; and it has +long been known, that <i>brenin</i> both in Welsh and in the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_307">[307]</span>language of lower Britany signifies king. The Romans +took it to be a proper name, just as they did in the case of +the Etruscan Lucumo. This Cymrian language has been +confounded with the Gaelic of the Highlands of Scotland, +and the two have been spoken of as dialects of the same +language; but this is certainly incorrect. I myself know +little about it, but quite enough to agree with those who +maintain, that they are two different languages, not indeed +as different as Basque and Gaelic, for the Basque has not +the least resemblance to either of them. I once heard an +English officer boldly assert, that soldiers from the Highlands +of Scotland conversed with the people of Ireland; but +this is as impossible as it would be for a person unacquainted +with Slavonic to converse with a Slavonian. No native +Gael can understand the smallest Welsh sentence; the whole +grammar of the two is different. It is further said that the +two languages have a number of words in common, and +that one fourth of all the words are akin to one another; +but this statement seems suspicious, as it is not confirmed +by any glossary. But admitting that the agreement actually +exists, it is only a local affinity, two nations having in some +points a resemblance, while their fundamental characters +are nevertheless different; so that they have either diverged +immensely from the same root, or else incline towards +each other, proceeding from totally different races. An +investigation of this subject belongs to general philology, +and if it were always entered upon with sound principles, +many prejudices would be dispersed, and much that is +mysterious would be cleared up. According to what I +have said, we cannot conceive the Belgae and Celts to be as +nearly allied, as, e.g., the Scandinavians and Germans, or +the Goths and Saxons, but they are as foreign to each other +as the Persians and Slavonians; in the languages of the +two last nations, many forms, nay, many particles and +words, are the same, but the grammar is different. We +must, therefore, be on our guard not to transfer to the +Belgae that which we know of the Gauls; we know nothing +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_308">[308]</span>of the institutions of the former, while those of the Celts +are well known. <i>Gael</i> is the root of the old German word +<i>Welsh</i>, which signifies anything that is not German.</p> + +<p>The Celts may have had much in common with the +Cymri, but their constitution was peculiar to them; we +have no proof to show that what Caesar says about them +also applies to the Belgae. The existence of an aristocratic +constitution, which, in the case of many other nations is +assumed only from misinterpreted expressions, cannot be +doubted among the Celts. We find among them two +ruling tribes, the knights and the priests, the well-known +Druids; the rest of the people were mere serfs. This +circumstance, as I have observed on other similar occasions, +intimates that the Celts, in the countries where we know +them, were conquering foreigners, and that the power which +drove them out of Spain, led them into a country, where, +in their turn, they subdued other people. My conjecture +is, that this latter people, extending over nearly the whole +of France, was no other than the Cymri, who, being +pressed by the Celts, advanced northward, and threw themselves +upon German tribes; and this circumstance produced +the mixture of Belgae and Germans in the north.</p> + +<p>It is well known that the Druids were a caste,⁠<a id="FNanchor_71" href="#Footnote_71" class="fnanchor">[71]</a> but it is +impossible to ascertain whether the Druids and knights were +two different castes, like the Brahmins and warriors in +India, or whether the Druids were only a branch of the +military caste, which occupied itself with matters of religion. +Certain it is, however, that all the power was divided +between these two, while the people lived in a condition +which Caesar describes by the term <i>clientela</i>, that is, bondage. +It was not exactly what we call serfdom; for the Celtic +people were dependent only in relation to their feudal lords, +whose retinue they formed, but in other respects they were +free; and besides them, slaves are expressly mentioned.</p> + +<p>The religion of the Druids was bloody and cruel, and for +this reason it was the only one that was attacked by the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_309">[309]</span>Romans; though they may have done so also because that +religion formed an obstacle to the Romanising of Gaul. +Success was not difficult, and the Druids were completely +crushed. It is possible that some of the later commotions +of which we read in Tacitus, as, e.g., those of Sacrovir and +Classicus, may have been connected with religion. The +Druids also were the depositories of a kind of science and +literature, for they had poems which it was unlawful to +commit to writing. In the transactions of ordinary life, +they used the Greek alphabet.</p> + +<p>In the time of Caesar, it would be erroneous to speak of +the Gauls as a really barbarous nation. It is true that +everything connected with the arts, such as their coins and +idols, is detestable, but in other things they seem to have +reached the same stage of civilization at which our ancestors +were in the time of the Othos. The population was +very large; but the Cimbrian war made fearful havoc, and +the misery resulting from it surpasses all our conceptions. +In the time of Caesar, they had only partially recovered +from it, and yet they present the appearance of a pretty +strong population: their towns were considerable, the +country was well cultivated; and all we hear of them suggests +to us the idea of a rude rather than a barbarous state +of things. The Romans became acquainted with water-mills +and saw-mills in Gaul, nor were manufactures wanting +there; but the Gauls were prevented by their treaties with +the Romans from cultivating vines and olives. Their style +of architecture is very common among ourselves, but +was utterly unknown among the Greeks and Romans: the +buildings consisted of wooden frames and wicker work, and +even the walls of their towns were joined by means of +beams, a method which was very surprising to the Romans. +This is the reason why there are so very few remains of the +ante-Roman period.</p> + +<p>The Gauls very quickly adopted the civilisation of the +Romans, who established themselves in the southern province +about the year of the city 630, and thence extended +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_310">[310]</span>their dominion towards Lyons. In Pliny’s time that +country was so completely changed, that he declares it to +be not a province but a true Italy. The rest of Gaul also +soon became Romanised, though the Latin language did +not spread there with equal facility; and we may probably +assume that at the time of the Frankish conquest the Celtic +language had not yet become extinct. Still, however, a +dialect of Latin, different in character from our Latin, was +diffused all over Gaul; and this is the root of the Romance +or Provençal language. The study of Roman literature +spread more and more; Gaul always had men of good +abilities, and thus a peculiar literature was formed, of which +Rheims, then called <i>Durocortorum</i>, was the seat and centre. +I think I have discovered a new proof of an ancient rustic +form of this name, according to which it was pronounced +<i>Durocortoro</i>; I allude to a fragment from Fronto in Consentius:⁠<a id="FNanchor_72" href="#Footnote_72" class="fnanchor">[72]</a> +<i>et illae vestrae Athenae Durocortoro</i>, where the +corrupt termination is probably intentional, Fronto sneering +at Consentius, because the inhabitants of the country did +not correctly pronounce the name of their own university +town.</p> + +<p>The inclination of the Gauls to separate from Rome, and +to constitute themselves as a distinct nation, manifests itself as +early as the reign of Tiberius, and then again under Vespasian. +Afterwards, we have the insurrection of Clodius +Albinus, in the reign of Septimius Severus, and another in +that of Gallienus, when, for a time, the Gauls had their +own emperors, who resided at Treves, until Tetricus betrayed +them to Aurelian. In all these movements we find, +at an early date, considerable symptoms of a feeling of +nationality, which was particularly strong during the fourth +century, when Constantius Chlorus maintained himself +there. Gaul always tried to set up opposition emperors: +we must not, however, assert that this was so easy because +those governors were stationed on the frontier, but it was +because the nation met them in their desire. In the fifth +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_311">[311]</span>century, a peculiar literary spirit manifested itself in Gaul, +and nearly all the more important productions of literature +during that century, both ecclesiastical and profane, belong +to Gaul. It possessed at that time many men of genius, +whose only disadvantage is the fact of their language +being quite rustic, that is, it is the language of common +life. Men of this kind are: the talented Sidonius +Apollinaris, Bishop Salvianus of Marseilles, Claudianus +Mamertus, Avitus, Cassianus, who was altogether a theological +writer, but a man of great ability and genius, and +Sulpicius Severus, who is even a very elegant writer, and +deserves to be strongly recommended; his diction is not +without faults, but he displays great intellectual worth, +sound understanding, and a singular independence of judgment, +at a time which bordered on a most terrible period. +The Gauls, however, were excited rather than stunned by +that unhappy period.</p> + +<p>The whole of Gaul, which the Romans describe as their +province, consisted of sixty-four <i>civitates</i>. In the time of +Tiberius, there existed a number of separate tribes, each of +which governed itself as a distinct state, and the same +also continued afterwards. The Romans then divided +Gaul into <i>Gallia Narbonensis</i>, <i>Aquitania</i>, and <i>Gallia Lugdunensis</i>. +Each of these provinces consisted of a number of +such <i>civitates</i>, which accordingly were both towns and states, +and that more so than at present the French departments. +They were absolutely subject to the Romans, but, before +they obtained the Roman franchise, they had their own +institutions. A <i>civitas</i> was governed by a senate, of which +the members resided in the capital, and every thing was +managed according to their ancient rights and usages. The +Roman franchise was first conferred upon them under Augustus; +but they did not obtain the right of being elected to +high offices or into the Roman senate. This franchise, however, +was confined to the <i>provincia Romana</i>, which extended as +far north as Lyons. The particulars are not known, but +some <i>civitates</i> within the Province had only the <i>jus Latii</i>. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_312">[312]</span>Afterwards many individual Gauls obtained the full franchise, +including the right of being elected into the Roman +senate. Claudius extended the franchise to Gallia Narbonensis, +at the same time conferring upon the inhabitants +the right of becoming members of the senate. Under Galba, +the remaining Gauls also obtained the franchise, but not the +Belgae. Tacitus (<i>Ann.</i> iii. 44) states that the sixty-four +Gallic <i>civitates</i> revolted, which no doubt is the sum total of +all the Gallic <i>civitates</i>, though it is not certain whether +Gallia Narbonensis is included or not.</p> + +<p>After the Gallic migration, and previously to the Roman +dominion in Gaul, some states had raised themselves to a +kind of supremacy, and many others were in a condition of +dependence. After the stormy period of migration, two +tribes, the <i>Arverni</i> and <i>Aedui</i>, unfortunately for Gaul, had +risen, and tried to crush each other, as Athens and Sparta +did in Greece. About two hundred and sixty years after +the capture of Rome by the Gauls, these two tribes were the +most powerful in the country; and all the others were +obliged to acknowledge the majesty of either the one or +the other. The Romans, who protected the Allobroges, +became involved in a war with the Arverni; and it must +have been on that occasion, perhaps after the victory of Q. +Fabius, that they concluded the alliance with the Aedui, in +which the latter were declared <i>fratres populi Romani</i>: with +their assistance, the Arverni were greatly humbled. After +this, the Aedui were, for a time, at the head of affairs; but +soon the Cymri or Cimbri, driven back from the east of +Europe, inundated Gaul. The Aedui then lost their power, +and the Sequani, in Franche Comté, rose in their place. +Caesar’s expressions on these affairs are unusual and strange, +and require explanation.</p> + +<p>The southern coast of Gaul, from the frontier of Catalonia, +had formerly been inhabited by Ligurians. In the +earliest times, they were mixed with Iberians, for Scylax of +Caryanda says, that Ligyans, mixed with Iberians, occupied +the country from the Pyrenees to the river Rhodanus. The +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_313">[313]</span>Iberians spread there as they did in Aquitania. The conquest +of the Iberians is repeated in that of the Visigoths and +of the Arabs, and extends as far as the Loire. The Iberians +were the rulers, and the Ligurians the subject people. At +a later period, the inhabitants of Languedoc were Gauls, +who had evidently advanced again and taken a portion of +the conquest from their conquerors, otherwise Caesar would +have described the inhabitants of those districts as Iberians. +The Gauls, probably, spread southward as well as eastward.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Narbo</span>, on the coast, was a large commercial city, which +had long been a great emporium, and from which a commercial +road passed right through Gaul to the Loire. Its +harbour is now filled up with sand, like nearly all others on +that coast; in antiquity, it was very well adapted for merchant +ships, though not for ships of war. During the period +between the Gracchi and the Cimbrian war, the Romans +founded there the town of <i>Narbo Martius</i> (in the provincial +dialect <i>Narbona</i>), which, on account of its importance, was +the provincial capital, without being politically the seat of +the government. This was its condition in the time of +Caesar and under the empire; but in the middle ages the +place decreased in importance, because it is unhealthy.</p> + +<p>Besides Narbo, there are very few important places in +that beautiful hilly country between the Rhone and the +Pyrenees. I may mention, however, <i>Agatha</i>, a Massilian +colony. <i>Nemausus</i> (Nismes) must have been a great city +under the Romans, as we may infer from the ruins still +existing. <i>Beterrae</i> (Beziers) can scarcely be believed to have +been a Gallic town; many Greek coins, with beautiful +Greek inscriptions have been found there; and I suspect +that it was a Massilian settlement.</p> + +<p>The coast from the Rhone to Italy ought not to be +regarded as a part of Gaul, but of Liguria. How far the +Ligurians dwelt inland, cannot be ascertained; but the +neighbourhood of Avignon was inhabited by Celts mixed +with Ligurians, as is manifest from the name of the <i>Celtoligyans</i> +who formed the population of that part. It is probable +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_314">[314]</span>that the Ligurians extended on the one hand towards +Italy as far as the Cottian Alps, and on the other, in Gaul +as far as the frontier of the Allobroges and the Basses-Alpes. +But in these latter parts, the Ligurians must be regarded as +the original inhabitants, and the greater part of the coast +was afterwards taken from them by the Iberians. Marseilles +was not the only Greek city there, but a number of Greek +settlements existed all along the coast: Nizza is the +ancient <i>Nicaea</i>, Antibes is the ancient <i>Antipolis</i>, and the +name of the <i>Hierian islands</i> shows that they were occupied +by Greeks.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Massalia</span> or <span class="smcap">Massilia</span>. The origin of this city is +frequently assigned to the reign of Cyrus, in consequence of +a confusion between the settlement of the Phocaeans on the +Ligurian coast, and their emigration after the conquest of +their city by Harpagus; but the two events are quite distinct. +Massalia was planted for commercial reasons, and +was originally a factory, whereas the emigration of the +Phocaeans was undertaken by them for the purpose of +escaping from the dominion of the barbarians. Massalia +did not contain those elements of growth and development +which it would have had among a kindred people in Greece +or Sicily; but it nevertheless became great at an early +period, through its trade and commerce and through the +reputation of its eunomia. Its relation of friendship with +Rome was assuredly based on historical tradition and was +very ancient; the presents sent by the Romans to the +temple of Delphi were deposited in the treasury of the Massaliots. +According to a statement of Trogus Pompeius in +Justin, Massalia had to carry on serious wars with Carthage +on account of the coral fisheries; Justin, indeed, speaks only +of fisheries, but he probably alludes to the coral fisheries on +the coast of Africa, which the Provençals possessed throughout +the middle ages and down to the present day. Massalia +acknowledged the supremacy of the Romans, who willingly +and zealously supported the city against the neighbouring +barbarians. In consequence of the fall of Carthage, the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_315">[315]</span>commerce of Massalia seems to have been greatly extended, +and after the destruction of Carthage, it appears, in fact, to +have stepped into its place. We cannot say with certainty +how long Greek culture maintained itself at Marseilles, but +it certainly preserved it longer than is commonly believed; +traces of it occur at a very late period, and copies of the +Greek gospels were made there as late as the ninth and +tenth centuries. In the third century of our era, it is still +called a Greek city; when, however, the Ligurians began +to become Romanised, their influence was irresistible, and +even Greeks were overpowered by it.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Arelas</span> or <span class="smcap">Arelate</span> was a great place during the +decline of the Roman empire and during the middle ages; +the modern Arles, just as the modern Ravenna, is only a +shadow of what it once was. In later times, Arelate was +the capital of Gaul.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Aquae Sextiae</span> (Aix), the first town founded by the +Romans in Gaul, was a military colony. It is celebrated +for the victory which Marius gained there. There were +several other military colonies on the Rhone and in Gallia +Narbonensis, such as <i>Forum Julii</i> (Fréjus), <i>Avineo</i> (Avignon), +<i>Arausio</i> (Oranges), <i>Nemausus</i> (Nismes), but not Narbo. In +the interior, as well as in the west and on the north-eastern +frontier, there were but few military colonies; +Lyons was not one of them, but there existed several +<i>coloniae civiles</i>. <i>Colonia Augusta Rauracorum</i> (Basle) was a +military colony.</p> + +<p>Beyond the Isara, we reach the extensive country of the +<span class="smcap">Allobroges</span>, who were a great and extensive nation even +as early as the time of Hannibal, when they occupied +nearly the whole of Dauphiné and the greater part of +Savoy. They allied themselves with Hannibal, and vigorously +opposed the Romans in the wars of Fabius Allobrogicus +and Domitius, but were overpowered; they were, +however, not subdued until the war which immediately +followed that of Sulla; their complete subjugation cannot +be assigned to an earlier period than that of Caesar, for at +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_316">[316]</span>the time of the Catilinarian conspiracy it was, properly +speaking, not yet complete.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Vienna</span> was no doubt a capital even in the time of +Hannibal; under the emperors it was a very important +town.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Lugdunum</span>, at the confluence of the Arar (Saone) and +the Rhodanus, was a colony founded by Munatius Plancus +in the earliest part of the reign of Augustus. It may have +been a Gallic town before, otherwise it would scarcely have +received a Gallic name; and this supposition quite agrees +with the system of the ancients, to found colonies in places +already existing as towns. Ancient Lugdunum was very +small in comparison with the modern Lyons; but it afterwards +became the residence of the Roman governor of the +provincia Lugdunensis.</p> + +<p>The country north of Lyons between mount Jura and +the Cevennes was inhabited by three tribes. The <i>Arverni</i>, +the westernmost of them, occupied the very heart and +centre of Gaul, so far as height and ramification of the mountains +are concerned. That district exhibits traces of an +immense volcanic activity at some remote period. On the +north-east of the Arverni, we have the <i>Aedui</i> (not <i>Haedui</i>), +in Bourgogne, and the <i>Sequani</i> in Franche Comté. In the +seventh century of Rome, these three nations were the most +powerful in Gaul; and the Arverni and Aedui were contending +for the supremacy. The Arverni and Allobroges +were allied, and Q. Fabius and Cn. Domitius, who carried +on war against them, broke the power of both in two campaigns. +The Arverni, like all Gallic tribes, are said to have +had kings, and names of kings occur on their barbarous +coins; according to some accounts which must probably be +traced to Posidonius, their power was very great. After +the war of Fabius and Domitius, the greatness of the +Arverni was completely gone; in the wars of Caesar, they +act a very subordinate part, and when the Aedui, their +former rivals, were humbled, the Arverni displayed a +malicious satisfaction. During the latest period of the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_317">[317]</span>Roman empire, however, they again rose to a certain moral +importance: when the Visigoths settled in Languedoc and +made Toulouse the residence of their kings, when the +Burgundians and other tribes advanced from the east, when +northern Gaul was isolated from Spain and Italy, and when +the war extended from the north-west to the Rhone, the +Arverni, who now regarded themselves as Romans, and felt +the greatest aversion against the barbarians, distinguished +themselves by their manly and heroic resistance to the +hostile conquerors. They were indeed ceded to the Goths, +but the barbarians did not settle among them, as they had +done in other countries by force of arms. The country of +the Arverni is called by Gregory of Tours that of the +<i>Romana nobilitas</i>. Sidonius Apollinaris does the greatest +honour to his province.</p> + +<p>The <i>Aedui</i> are termed <i>fratres populi Romani</i> as a recognition +of their political fraternity and equality, but not on +account of any relationship, as Lucan thinks. <i>Augustodunum</i> +was their most important town.</p> + +<p>The <i>Sequani</i> rose after the fall of the Arverni, just as the +Boeotians and Aetolians did in Greece after the decay of +the great states. When Caesar arrived in Gaul, his conquest +averted from the country the calamity which, four centuries +and a half later, actually came upon it, I allude to its conquest +by the Germans; for Ariovistus and the Suevi had already +settled in the country, as was afterwards done by the +Franks: if the first conquest had succeeded, the country +would have been called Suabia instead of France. Caesar +subdued the Sequani.</p> + +<p><i>Tolosa</i>, on the left of the Arverni, was the most important +town on the upper Garonne, and was remarkable for the +temple and the gold accumulated in it, which the Romans, +under Caepio, had taken as booty in the Cimbrian war. +When Caesar appeared there, the people were already subject +to the Romans.</p> + +<p>The real <i>Aquitanians</i>, as I have already observed, were +Iberians; but Augustus extended Aquitania for political +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_318">[318]</span>convenience as far as the Loire; historically it did not +extend beyond the Garonne.</p> + +<p><i>Burdigala</i> was an ancient emporium. These towns +were always favoured by the natural advantages of their +situation.</p> + +<p>According to Caesar, the <i>Matrona</i> and <i>Sequana</i> formed +the frontier between Celtic Gaul and the Belgae. This is +generally understood, as if those rivers had always been +the permanent line of separation between the two nations, +but if this had been the case, we should not be able to +understand how the inhabitants of Lower Britany could be +of the same race as the Belgae. In order to account for +this fact, people have had recourse to an immigration, +and it is alleged that, owing to the influx of Angli, +Saxons, and Frisians into Britain, a part of the British +population quitted their native island and settled in Lower +Britany. But this alleged colony of Britons is not supported +by any historical evidence; the writers of the fifth +century say nothing about it, and what they do say, does +not refer to an immigration, but to the fact that a part of +Armorica, in the fifth century, made itself independent of +Rome. We may assert, on the contrary, that, at an earlier +period, the Cymri inhabited a much greater part of Gaul, +and that in Lower Britany alone they maintained themselves +against the invading Celts, while Normandy and the other +countries were conquered by the Gael. The physical +nature of Lower Britany also was favourable to its isolation; +marshes and forests render it inaccessible, whence the +inhabitants also remained free from Roman contagion. In +this manner, the Cymrian element was preserved against the +influence of the Gauls.</p> + +<p>In the fourth and fifth centuries, the northern coast from +the Loire to the frontier of the Netherlands, was called +<i>Tractus Aremoricus</i> or <i>Aremorica</i> which in Celtic signifies +“maritime country.” The commotions of the third century, +which continued to increase during the fourth and fifth, +repeatedly drove the Romans from that country. French +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_319">[319]</span>antiquaries imagine that it was a regularly constituted Gallic +republic, of which Chlovis had the protectorate, but this +is wrong.</p> + +<p>The country north of the Matrona and Sequana was +inhabited by the <span class="smcap">Belgae</span>, who belonged to the race of the +Cymri, and were mixed with Germans only accidentally, +because conquered Germans lived among them. The <i>Remi</i>, +with their capital of <i>Durocortorum</i>, were the most distinguished +tribe among them in the time of Caesar, and they +continued to be great for a long time after, although during +the Roman wars they had, properly speaking, fallen from +their height. The frontier between the Belgae and Germany +is involved in much obscurity; in regard to many +tribes, such as the Menapii, it is even doubtful as to whether +they were Germans or Cymri. The <i>Treviri</i>, according to +Tacitus, were <i>ambitiosi circa Germanicam originem</i>. On the +whole, it would seem that eighteen or nineteen hundred +years ago the frontier of the Germans was pretty much the +same as it is now. Alsace was occupied by Germans, and +the Vosges mountains, and the modern Walloon district +about Liege probably formed the boundary. It is possible +that at a later period Brabant and Flanders were still +Cymric, but nothing decisive can be said about this.⁠<a id="FNanchor_73" href="#Footnote_73" class="fnanchor">[73]</a>⁠</p> + +<p>The German nations were divided, in the Roman administration +into two great parts, <i>Germania prima</i> and <i>secunda</i>, +which were connected with Gaul only on account of the general +government, but were not included by the Romans in the +name of Gaul; and at a later time, they were politically +separated, because they were under a military government.</p> + +<p>Treves was the capital of these parts; in Tacitus it is still +called <span class="smcap">Treviri</span>, but afterwards <span class="smcap">Augusta Trevirorum</span>. +Ever since the third century, it was probably a considerable +city, though not in its circumference, which +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_320">[320]</span>people generally are inclined to make much too large; it +does not appear to have been much greater than that of its +present walls, which, however, is not inconsiderable, if the +place was well peopled. The amphitheatre was no doubt +outside the walls, as in all Roman towns, except Rome +itself. The greatness of Treves extends from the middle of +the third to the fifth century; the architectural remains, as +is evident from their style, belong to that period. It is the +period after Maximinus, or somewhat later, after Valerian, +when the barbarians advanced on all sides; the Gallic emperors +resided at Treves.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Colonia Agrippina</span> (Cologne) was less important; it +was a frontier fortress and a prosperous colony; but by no +means of the importance of Treves.</p> + +<p>Traces of Roman settlements are particularly numerous +in upper Alsace. <i>Germania prima</i> and <i>secunda</i> were not +confined to the left bank of the Rhine: in the reign of +Trajan, the Romans had extended the frontier to the line +marked by the <i>limes</i> running through a part of Nassau, +across the Maine, and as far as the Alps. This <i>sinus imperii</i> +did not form a separate province, but belonged to Germania +on the left bank of the Rhine, being one of those <i>provinciae +Germaniae</i>, which had their own <i>praesides</i>. It was, on the +whole, a favourite practice at that time to divide the +power among several magistrates.</p> + +<h3 id="Britannia"><span class="smcap">Britannia.</span></h3> + +<p>Britain was known in the most remote times; but its +name does not occur until the Macedonian period; it was +previously designated by the name of <i>Cassiterides insulae</i>. The +tin trade can be traced to a very early period; for the first +attempts to smelt copper were made by mixing it with tin. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_321">[321]</span>The brass of the ancients, the real χαλκός, consisted for the +most part of tin, and all the ancient Roman ases consist of +copper and tin. Ὀρείχαλκος, from ὀρεύς, a mule, is something +different (Messing), and the spuriousness of the mixture is +indicated even by its name. A plentiful supply of tin is not +found in any part of Europe, except Cornwall, whence it is +quite certain that the name Cassiterides refers to Britain. The +trade in it was carried on from Gades; but the Massilians +had, no doubt, their share in it, as we may infer from the +voyages of Pytheas. In the geography of Eratosthenes, the +British islands are already mentioned in the plural; but +before the time of Caesar, this part of the world was +buried in great obscurity.</p> + +<p>Britain, like Gaul, was inhabited by the two nations, the +Gael and the Cymri; but it is very difficult and problematical +to draw the boundary line between the two. The north +seems originally to have been occupied by Cymri, though, +according to Tacitus, who in this matter also is a weighty +authority, apparently with an admixture of Germans or Scandinavians. +At present, the inhabitants in the west, from +Cumberland down to Cornwall, so far as the ancient population +is preserved, are Cymri; but we do not know whether +these Cymri retreated to those parts during the conquests +of the Angli and Saxons, or whether they had dwelt there +even before. In Ireland nearly the whole population is +Gaelic; the north, about Ulster, contains only feeble traces +of Belgae or Cymri, and if this observation be correct, it is +a proof of a conquest having taken place. From Ireland +the Gaelic population spread into Scotland, but it is uncertain +whether in this latter country they strengthened the Gael +who already dwelt there, or whether they expelled tribes of +the Cymri. These events belong to a comparatively recent +period. The Picts, in the south-west of Scotland, unquestionably +belonged to the Cymrian race.</p> + +<p>All Britain, like the country on the east of the British +Channel, was inhabited by a number of small tribes, each of +which had its own peculiar institutions. But they were much +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_322">[322]</span>more uncivilised than those in Gaul, which had unquestionably +been much benefited by their intercourse with Massilia +and Rome. The conquest of Britain was attempted by +Julius Caesar from a mere love of enterprise, and without +any definite object, but he soon gave it up. Under +Augustus the Romans were little concerned about Britain, +and Tiberius only wanted stillness and stagnation, +whence his generals could not attempt any great undertakings: +he scarcely allowed them to defend themselves when +they were hard pressed. This state of things ceased under +Claudius, who undertook an expedition into Britain without +Rome having any real interest in it. The conquest was +wonderfully successful: a great part of England was subdued, +and colonies were established in the country. A part +of the inhabitants soon became Romanised, built towns +according to the Roman fashion, and obtained the Roman +franchise. Under Domitian, Agricola carried his conquests +as far as the interior of Scotland. The hostility of the Picts +induced Hadrian, and afterwards Severus, to build frontier +walls against the northern tribes. Britain soon acquired +the appearance of a civilised country, but the Romans did +not concern themselves about Ireland. In the third century, +Britain also acquired a kind of political importance, +but it always remained subordinate to Gaul. Afterwards, +during the invasions from the north, the inhabitants shewed +great weakness and helplessness and were unable to +defend their frontier walls. In no part of Europe has the +ancient population been so utterly annihilated as in the +eastern parts of England by the conquest of the Saxons.</p> + +<p>The towns in Britain are not of any great historical importance; +<i>Camalodunum</i> alone ought perhaps to be mentioned. +<i>London</i> shows how successful the Romans were in selecting +sites for towns. Tacitus, when speaking of the people +in the south-west of England, says that they resembled the +Spaniards, and he suspects that they were of Spanish origin. +It is not impossible that Iberians may have spread as far as +those districts, but whether there be any foundation for this +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_323">[323]</span>opinion or not cannot be decided, for all historical traces +are lost. It is possible, however, that there may have been +a tradition, that the Gauls, who had conquered the north of +Spain, were afterwards expelled from it; in this case we +should be obliged to suppose that the Gauls, when driven +out of Spain, arrived in Britain by sea. With few exceptions, +all the stories of the middle ages relating to +ancient times are devoid of historical value. The tradition +of Irish chronicles—that their ancestors came from +Spain—though it is interwoven with a tissue of fables, +may yet not be altogether without some foundation. In +the British legends, on the other hand, there occur stories, +as if in the time of the Romans the country had been +governed by native kings. English antiquaries, attaching +too much weight to these stories, have imagined that +Britain was a kind of feudal kingdom under the supremacy +of Rome, whereas, in truth, it was governed like every +other province.</p> + +<h3 id="Celtic_Nations_on_the_East_of_the_Rhine"><span class="smcap">Celtic Nations on the East of the Rhine.</span></h3> + +<p>In order to complete the account of the Gallic race, let +us turn our attention to the eastern banks of the Rhine. +Caesar and Tacitus speak of Gauls dwelling in southern +Germany, and expressly state that they spoke Gallic. One +of these nations is the <i>Aravisci</i>; another the <i>Boii</i>, probably +in Bohemia, but elsewhere also. These Boians appear +as a great people on the Danube as well as in Italy, +whereas in Gaul itself there are but few traces of them. +No one can deny emigration in this instance, where a nation +diverges in two opposite directions, the one dwelling on +the north, and the other on the south of the Alps. The +Boians were afterwards extirpated, and that probably by the +Cymri. The <i>Norici</i> in Carniola and Carinthia, are likewise +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_324">[324]</span>mentioned as Gauls under Gallic kings; after the period of +the Hannibalian war, about the time of the foundation of +Aquileia, they were on terms of friendship with the +Romans. They occupied the country from the frontiers of +Italy as far as the Danube, but were not connected on their +Italian frontier with the other Gallic tribes, being separated +from them by the Raetians and Vindelicians. In the east, +however, they were connected with a succession of Gallic +tribes, and probably in the west also, that is, in the north +of the Vindelicians and of the Danube. The <i>Vindelici</i> +were a Liburnian people, north of the Raetians at the foot +of the Brenner, and probably in Bavaria also; but their +frontier on the northern slope of the Alps and farther +towards the Danube cannot be defined. In the east of the +Norici, we find the <i>Taurisci</i>, and further on, the <i>Scordisci</i>, +both terrible nations, which for two centuries (down to the +seventh century of Rome) spread terror far and wide among +the nations of those parts. The Scordiscans were extirpated +by the Romans in an internecine war, or at least so much +reduced that afterwards the Getae completely annihilated +them: in the first century after Christ, they can scarcely be +said to have existed at all. These nations appear in those +countries at a time of which Caesar speaks as of a bygone +age, that is, about Olymp. 100, soon after the Gauls had +taken possession of Gallia Cisalpina. The time at which +the tide of migration from the west crossed the Rhine, cannot +be determined, but after it had once commenced it continued +to flow to far distant countries in the east. Some of the +tribes established themselves in the districts they had conquered, +while others pressed onward, until they met with +some insurmountable obstacle. The Tauriscans and Scordiscans +displaced the Triballians, and extirpated the greater +part of the Illyrians, while they subdued the rest; for a +period of two centuries they then ruled over those countries +as far as the frontiers of Macedonia, and at times over Macedonia +itself; afterwards, when Rome had destroyed the kingdom +of Macedonia, they even invaded Greece. About the end +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_325">[325]</span>of the fifth century of Rome, they dwelt for a time in Macedonia, +until they were expelled by Antigonus Gonatas. In +like manner they subdued Thrace, which thus was a Gallic +empire until the middle of the sixth century of Rome, when +it was completely destroyed. All the foreign tribes which +we meet with in Asia Minor, and which for a period of +fifty years traversed Western Asia like nomades, belong to +the same current of migration which left behind the +Tauriscans and Scordiscans, and overran Thrace; they +threw themselves into Asia, and settling in Phrygia, there +formed what was afterwards called <i>Galatia</i>. They were +gradually tamed by the kings of Pergamus, by time, and +by the Asiatic climate and mode of life. After the war +with Antiochus, the Romans took the opportunity to attack +them for the purpose of protecting the people of Western +Asia and of preventing any germs of development being +formed there. Now whether the Gauls whom we afterwards +meet with on the north bank of the Danube, were a branch +of that great current, which in its onward course became +divided, turning on the right into Thrace, and on the left +into Wallachia, is a question concerning which we can only +form conjectures. It certainly is possible: but it is also +possible that another migration may have spread in the +north of the Carpathians. But it is an undoubted fact, that, +during the sixth century of Rome, at the time of the wars of +Philip and Perseus, the great nation of the <i>Bastarnae</i> dwelt on +the lower Danube and in Wallachia. From the monuments +of Olbia, in the neighbourhood of the modern Odessa, on the +Dniepr, it is manifest that at the time when the great +inscription was set up, Olbia was inhabited by Gauls; and +among them are mentioned the <i>Sciri</i>, who afterwards, +during the great migration of nations, are spoken of along +with the Rugians. Unfortunately the inscription bears no +date, though it probably belongs to the end of the sixth or +the beginning of the seventh century of Rome: at that +time, then, the Gauls extended as far as the Ukraine. The +first thirty years of the seventh century must be regarded +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_326">[326]</span>as the end of that migration; hence the expedition of +the Cimbri, that is, Cymri, belongs to that period, for most +of those Gallic tribes were, no doubt, Cymri, and the names +of their chiefs are Cymric. This supposition also agrees +with the account of Posidonius, that the Cimbri (Cymri) +came from the Euxine.⁠<a id="FNanchor_74" href="#Footnote_74" class="fnanchor">[74]</a> The Bastarnae remained in the +country about the Carpathians until the time of Tacitus, +and maintained themselves against the Sarmatian immigration, +which first set the Cymri in motion. I have written +a separate treatise on the migration of the Sarmatians.⁠<a id="FNanchor_75" href="#Footnote_75" class="fnanchor">[75]</a> +In Herodotus we find the Scythians on the Tanais as far as +the Banat, all Moldavia and Wallachia was occupied by them, +and the Triballians are found in Lower Hungary; but, afterwards, +the latter occur in Moldavia, the Getae in Wallachia, +and the Celts between these two. The different +periods, therefore, must be carefully distinguished.</p> + +<p>Johannes Müller was the first to propound the correct +view about the Cimbri, maintaining that they were not +Germans, but Celts, and that they did not come from the +north. The work in which he proves this was his earliest +production, and at the same time his most critical one, +but he does not understand the nature of the Gallic migration. +The Teutones were unquestionably Germans.</p> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_327">[327]</span></p> + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="AFRICA">AFRICA.</h2> + +</div> + +<h3 id="Cyrenaica"><span class="smcap">Cyrenaica.</span></h3> + +<p>The coast of Libya between the Syrtes and Egypt, both +begins and ends with a narrow, inhabitable, and yet barren +tract of land; but in the middle, where the country +reaches the northernmost parallel, it is beautiful, inhabited, +and of considerable breadth. The eastern coast of the Syrtes +is a complete sandy desert, still, however, not so much so as +to be totally uninhabitable; towards Egypt, the country is +stony, dry, and incapable of cultivation. But between +Berenice and a little to the east of Cyrene, it is beautiful, +richly watered, and fertile. The whole forms a slope; the +interior of Africa is considerably elevated, and the desert, +too, where it is removed from the coast, is high, while +towards the coast the land sinks down; only the tract on +which Cyrene is situated, forms another table-land rich in +wood and springs of water. From Cyrene downwards to +the sea, the country is likewise well watered and capable of +cultivation. The elevation of Cyrene is so considerable, that +the harvest time differs by a full month from that in the +lower country. The coast, however, is not so beautiful +nor so well fitted to be inhabited as the higher country.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Cyrene</span> is situated at a distance of about ten English +miles from the sea, but the beautiful country extends much +farther into the interior; in the neighbourhood of Barca and +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_328">[328]</span>Berenice, the fertile country is less broad. There are +different traditions about the first settlement at Cyrene; +according to one, the town was founded by Aristaeus and his +mother Cyrene, and according to another by the Antenorids. +This we learn from Pindar’s epinician hymns and his scholiasts; +and these statements clearly show, that either a +Tyrrheno-Pelasgian settlement existed there before the +arrival of the Greeks, or at least that there was a +belief that the coast had previously been inhabited by +Pelasgians. Confusions, like that of Aristaeus with the +Trojan Agenorids, also occur among other nations, among +whom Tyrrhenian traditions existed. These legends, moreover, +show different phases: according to one, the colonists +who founded Cyrene came from Thera, whereas, according +to Apollonius Rhodius, in his Argonautics, Triton, the +Libyan god of the sea, gave to the Argonauts a clod of +earth, which, on being thrown by them into the sea, formed +the island of Thera. Here, then, we have again the same +fluctuation as to mother-city and colony, which we have +seen so often. Afterwards Cyrene was Doric, and unquestionably +a colony of Thera. It was originally a small +settlement, but during the period of the great commotion +in Greece, about Olymp. 40, people from all parts of Greece +flocked to Cyrene, being invited to defend the colony +against the Libyans. Cyrene thus became great, and acquired +the circumference which is still indicated by its +magnificent ruins. Its kings traced their origin to the +heroic ages, and are mentioned in history down to the +Persian period, after which they disappear. The isolated +situation of Cyrene was extremely fortunate, and few Greek +cities have been visited by so few great calamities as Cyrene. +When the Persians ruled in Egypt, Cyrene was little more +than nominally dependent, for the deserts by which it was +separated from Egypt, afforded it the means of putting itself +in a favourable relation to Persia. When Egypt was +governed by native kings, Cyrene was doubly well off, +because it was for the interest of the Egyptians to keep up +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_329">[329]</span>a good understanding with the Greeks. At the time of the +overthrow of the Persian empire, Cyrene placed itself under +the protection of Alexander; afterwards it fell into the +hands of Magas, a half-brother of Ptolemy Soter, under +whom the country became very prosperous, because Greeks +and Greek civilisation withdrew to that coast. It then was +for a time an Egyptian province, but again emancipated +itself; on which occasion it was severely ravaged. Afterwards +it became an appanage principality of the family of +the Ptolemies, until in the end it came under the dominion +of Rome, under whose rule it gradually decayed. In the +history of Hadrian, we hear of the subjugation of rebellious +Jews in Cyprus and Cyrenaica, which may have been one +of the more immediate causes of the decay of Cyrene, so +that in the time of Synesius it appears as a deserted, inactive, +and insignificant place. Greek civilisation, however, maintained +itself there for a long time, as we see from the letters of +Synesius, the talented bishop of Cyrene in the fifth century. +The city was at last destroyed during the Arab conquest, +and has never recovered since that time. At present it is +in a condition like that of Palmyra: the wandering Arabs +encamp among the ruins of its temples, and the few peasants +living in the neighbourhood destroy the monuments still +more.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Berenice</span> is the westernmost place on the same coast. +Three towns, Berenice, Arsinoe, and Ptolemais, derived +their names from members of the royal family of Egypt. +Berenice was a newly-built town, situated on the frontier +towards Carthage. At present not a trace of it remains, +but the ruins of <span class="smcap">Arsinoe</span>, or Tauchira, are very numerous. +According to the description of Della Celia, a Genoese physician, +the walls measure three Italian miles in circumference, +and are covered all over with inscriptions. The most +ample materials for history might be discovered there. The +origin of the town is unknown.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Barca</span>, founded in the reign of the third Arcesilaus, was +an ἀποδασμὸς of the Cyreneans, and for a long time hostile +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_330">[330]</span>to Cyrene. Afterwards its name was changed into <i>Ptolemais</i>, +and it is still called <i>Tolometa</i>, which arose out of +<i>Ptolemaide</i>.</p> + +<p><i>Apollonia</i> was the port town of Cyrene.</p> + +<p>On the west, Cyrene bordered upon the great republic of</p> + +<h3 id="Carthage"><span class="smcap">Carthage.</span></h3> + +<p>The frontier between these two states was as natural as +any can be between two countries. The whole district +from the bay of the lesser Syrtis, or the country of Tripoli, +is a deep sandy desert, of which only a few parts, the +neighbourhood of Tripoli, and the ancient Leptis, are +capable of cultivation. But agriculture there being limited +to sandy districts, produces nothing but <i>durra</i>, the African +millet, and palm trees, which succeed in sandy ground, if it +is well watered. The desert advances close to the coast, and +the inhabitable coast tract is interrupted and unequal. On +the east of Leptis, where the desert retreats farther into the +interior and around the great Syrtis, the country forms a +real sea of sand, which is far more dangerous than the +Sahara, where the ground is for the most part firm; on this +Syrtis, on the other hand, persons sink deep into the sand +at every step.</p> + +<p>On the frontier there were boundary marks, called <i>Arae +Philaenorum</i>. The tradition about them was as follows:—Once +the Cyreneans and Carthaginians being involved in a +dispute about their frontiers, determined to send out men +from the two extreme towns of their countries at the same +moment, agreeing that the point of their meeting should be +the frontier. This tradition is probably an invention, like so +many other things which Sallust relates from Punic authorities. +The <span class="smcap">Syrtes</span> are generally described by the ancients, +especially by the earlier Greeks, as one only. The Syrtis, +they say, has tides, and is a bay full of sand-banks, which are +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_331">[331]</span>sometimes sufficiently covered with water and sometimes +rise above the water like lagoons. The existence of tides +in the Mediterranean has, until recently, been denied, and +all the statements of the ancients regarding them have been +rejected, as in general ancient geography, about thirty or +forty years ago, was treated with extreme recklessness. +Tides do exist beyond all doubt, but they occur in a very +irregular and unaccountable manner. They are very unequal: +at Venice you may see it every day, and during a +spring tide, the water rises as much as one foot and a half; +it also exists in the Archipelago and in the Euripus near +Chalcis, where it comes from the north, which has given +rise to the story about the death of Aristotle.⁠<a id="FNanchor_76" href="#Footnote_76" class="fnanchor">[76]</a> It is said, +that at Naples the tides are not perceptible, but that at +Antium they are, especially when there is a spring tide. +The peculiarity of the Syrtes, which the ancients asserted, +and which moderns have denied, is that a current runs into +the Syrtes and thus throws vessels on the sand-banks. This +arises from the meetings of two currents, one of which +comes from the Adriatic and the other from the Aegean; +the one coming from the Euxine encounters that coming +from the Ionian sea, and moves round in a curve, as in +general all currents of the sea move in curves. We cannot +wonder, therefore, that during a north-west wind, ships, +sailing from Sicily to the Archipelago, were thrown into +the Syrtes: the danger was, of course, much greater for the +ancients than for us. The countries round the Syrtes are +the most wretched and melancholy districts of all the +inhabited parts of the earth; they are worse than the desert +itself, except that water is not wanting for so long a period +as in the desert. The caravans dig wells, but the water +is bad.</p> + +<p>The whole of the western part of the north coast of +Africa, of which Carthage is the central point, was once +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_332">[332]</span>under the dominion of Carthage, from the Syrtes to the +straits of Gibraltar, though that dominion was not the same +everywhere. The modern Algiers and Morocco contain no +traces of Carthaginian colonies; there existed in those parts +nothing but Carthaginian forts and factories for commercial +purposes; but Tunis and Tripoli, that is, the whole coast +from Hippo to Leptis, was covered with Punic towns. +Some of them were more ancient than Carthage (which was +for this reason called “New Town”); Utica, Hippo, Leptis, +and perhaps also Hadrumetum, and others whose names +can no longer be ascertained, were, like Gades, direct colonies +of Tyre and Sidon in Phoenicia, and had been founded +at the time when so many Phoenician settlements were +formed on the coasts of Greece, in the islands of the Archipelago, +and in Cyprus. It was during that period of the +greatness of Phoenicia, which lies beyond our history, that +numerous colonies were established on the coast of Africa. +We do not know what circumstances directed the attention +to those parts, for the Libyans were a great people. The +nature of the country is very different in different parts: +Tripoli (which is inhabitable from the head of the lesser +to the greater Syrtis), is the foreland of the desert, while +Tunis is much more fertile. Here the northern chain of +mount Atlas terminates; and the western part of Tunis is a +mountainous, beautiful, and fertile country. One range of the +mountain extends as far as the sea, forming a hilly country, +with the beautiful promontory and the bay of Carthage. +The territory from this promontory as far as the Syrtes is, +according to all descriptions, one of the most fertile +countries, though the district in which Carthage was +situated was less healthy and of a less agreeable climate. +<i>Byzacene</i>, or the eastern coast of Tunis, on the other hand, +is very healthy, and has no overpowering heat, except in +rare cases when the poisonous wind blows from the desert +this wind is much more frequent at Carthage and it +neighbourhood.</p> + +<p>This coast, then, was thickly studded with towns, the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_333">[333]</span>more ancient ones were Tyrian, and the more recent ones +Carthaginian settlements. The inhabitants of the latter are +called <i>Libyphoenices</i>, whence, from their very name, we +cannot suppose that they were of pure Punic blood: they +were Punians who had admitted Africans among them, and +their language was a corrupt Punic. The Carthaginians +were greatly inclined to mix with, and admit other tribes, +which accounts for the fact of their language being so +widely spread: all the civilisation adopted by the Africans +was Punic. The Carthaginians had a peculiar Libyan +alphabet, and when the writing of the Tuariks is once +discovered, I hope the Carthaginian inscriptions also will +be deciphered. Their literature, however, was Punic. +The Romans gave the library of Carthage as a present +to the kings of Numidia; that library contained the +native historical records of Africa, from which such singular +statements were extracted by Sallust in composing +his Jugurtha, and the key to which must still be discovered: +they did not contain real history, but we can see from them +in what light those nations regarded their history.</p> + +<p>The language of the original inhabitants of northern +Africa was perhaps more widely spread than any other: +this is the language of the Berbers, which was once spoken +from the Canary islands in the west to the cataracts of the +Nile, and in some parts it is spoken even at the present +day. It is singular that the nation speaking that language +embraced tribes of quite different physical characters, whites +as well as blacks (though not negroes); the ancients, in fact, +distinguish between Gaetulians and Melanogaetulians, though +they regard them as one nation. Harsh rudeness was a +generally prevailing characteristic of the nation, but in proportion +to the extent of country occupied by it, it was not +numerous; at present their descendants occur only in the +oases of the desert, while formerly they extended from the +Mediterranean to the banks of the Niger; on the coast +they have nearly everywhere been displaced by the Arabs, +who are still gaining ground, so that now they are found +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_334">[334]</span>only in some parts of Algiers and Morocco. The Romans +called them <i>Afri</i>, and the Greeks, Λίβυες; it has been supposed +that the latter name is connected with that of Levante +or Leguante. The name by which the nation designates +itself, viz., Amazirgh, Mazirgh, or Mzirgh, is found, according +to an observation of Castiglione, even in Herodotus, +who speaks of Μάσυες; this is the correct form occurring +in the MSS., instead of which the printed editions erroneously +give Μάξυες. The name <i>Massaesyli</i>, which was +given to the western Libyans between the lesser Syrtis and +the Ocean, also is nothing but Mazirgh Shilha, for they +also call themselves Shilhas. The eastern tribes are called +<i>Massyli</i>, which is the same as Μάσυες, for the termination +<i>yli</i> seems to be the common Italian one, which we find in +<i>Aequuli</i> for <i>Aequi</i>. The Carthaginians probably called them +by this name. The bilingual inscriptions, which exist in +considerable numbers, would throw more light upon the +language of those countries, if they were deciphered, and +they may possibly contain the key by which the Punic +inscriptions also are to be explained.</p> + +<p>It is singular that the Romans called those nations +<i>Numidae</i>, which is not a proper name, but a common noun. +The Greek form was νομάδες, and from this the Romans +made <i>Numidae</i>, a circumstance which shows to what extent +Greek words were in common use among the Romans. +Afterwards <i>Numida</i> and <i>Numidia</i> became names of the +nation and the country, so that, no doubt, Masinissa called +himself king of Numidia. These tribes extended from the +boundary of the Carthaginian territory to the river Molochath +(Mulucha), which still may be regarded as the frontier +of Algiers. We must not, however, suppose that the +country beyond that river was occupied by a different race, +for it was only another tribe of the same stock. These latter +were called <i>Mauri</i> (Μαυροὶ, Blacks, in the Alexandrian +dialect), a name which became as firmly established for the +western tribes as Numidae was for the eastern ones. The +country in the south, between Mount Atlas and the Sahara, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_335">[335]</span>as far as the Niger, was inhabited by the <i>Gaetuli</i> and <i>Melanogaetuli</i>, +the modern Tuariks. The Melanogaetuli were +unquestionably of the same race as the Gaetuli, but had no +doubt arisen from a mixture with the Aethiopians, who +dwelt there. They were accordingly a dark mixed race +like that at present in Darfoor. We do not know by what +name they called themselves.</p> + +<p>The <i>Garamantes</i> are placed too far to the south-east in +our maps; they were the inhabitants of the modern Fezzan, +and the present town of Germa was their capital, where +Roman inscriptions are still found among the ruins. The +dominion of the Romans in those parts, about which +nothing is said by ancient geographers, belongs to the +second century, when they extended their power in different +directions, for under Trajan they entered far into the interior +of Arabia, and in Nubia they advanced as far as Dongola, +the surrounding tribes being too weak to offer effectual +resistance. The distance between Tripoli and Fezzan is +about forty days’ journey. The town of <i>Augila</i>, mentioned +by Herodotus, in the country of the Nasamones, is called +to this day Audyeelah or Eudyeelah; the name of the Nasamones +themselves has not yet been re-discovered. Count +Castiglione has written a very beautiful essay on those +countries in the form of an appendix to his work entitled +“Les Monnaies des Arabes frappées en Afrique.”</p> + +<p>Herodotus divides Africa into four parts, the agricultural, +the mountainous, the country of beasts of prey, and the +desert. Beyond the river, Nigritae also are mentioned, but +we must not imagine that either this name or that of the +river Niger has anything to do with <i>niger</i>, black; it is the +Punic <i>nahar</i> which signifies “a river,” and shows the intercourse +of the Carthaginians with those countries. The +same fact has also been confirmed by the discovery of balls +and staves of glass of exquisite beauty in those parts. The +art of treating glass in such a manner as to include in a +white glass a number of flowers, balls, and other objects, +without injuring the outlines, is assuredly of Phoenician +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_336">[336]</span>origin, and at present quite unknown. Some specimens of +such glass are found in Italy, where it was partly employed +to ornament rooms, and quite a similar piece of glasswork +has been discovered in the tomb of a negro king in Guinea, +whither it had evidently been exported from Carthage. +Such pieces are said to have been used as ornaments for +victors, and there is even a tradition among the negroes, +that these glass ornaments have from time immemorial +belonged to their sceptres. Servius states, that the Romans +gave to the chiefs of the Berbers ornamented sticks instead +of sceptres; the same custom still exists, but the sticks are +not adorned with silver.</p> + +<p>The name <i>Marmarica</i> is derived from <i>mar</i>, salt, with a +reduplication very frequent in those languages.</p> + +<p>Among all the settlements on that Coast, <span class="smcap">Carthage</span> is +by far the most illustrious. The situation and greatness of +the city are described in the later excerpts from Diodorus +of Sicily, in Strabo, and in Appian’s Punica. One point, +however, must not be lost sight of in these descriptions, +viz., the ancients assume that Carthage covered the peninsula +which was connected with the mainland by the +isthmus, and that the isthmus was cut off by means of a +wall. But the fact is, that the whole of the peninsula was +not occupied by the city, which, in that case, would have +been immensely large. M. Humbert, a Dutch lieutenant, +who was long engaged in the service of the pasha of Tunis, +and was a good observer, discovered during his excavations, +some years ago, the ruins of ancient Carthage and the +walls by which it was surrounded. He made an excellent +ground plan of those remains, which, however, has never +been published, but exists only in MS. According to this +plan, the peninsula contained two towns, the ancient Punic +Carthage on the south side, perhaps not occupying one-half +of the peninsula, and Roman Carthage on the other side +towards Rome, which had been built by J. Caesar: lying +under the curse of Scipio, the site of the ancient city could +not be occupied by a new town. The remains of Roman +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_337">[337]</span>Carthage are far more numerous than those of the more +ancient city; the little that is to be seen of the latter consists +of gigantic works about the harbour (Cothon).</p> + +<p>Ancient Carthage consisted of two parts, viz., the city +called <i>Bozra</i> (the Greeks call it Βύρσα), and the suburb +<i>Megara</i>, the Punic name of which was probably Magal. +The remaining part of the peninsula may have been included +under this name. These suburban districts were protected +against the attacks of the barbarous Libyans by walls +across the isthmus.⁠<a id="FNanchor_77" href="#Footnote_77" class="fnanchor">[77]</a> We must not imagine that there was a +separate acra besides Byrsa, the elevation of which is +insignificant, only the point containing the temple of +Aesculapius may perhaps be compared to a real acra. According +to Timaeus, Carthage was built thirty-seven⁠<a id="FNanchor_78" href="#Footnote_78" class="fnanchor">[78]</a> years +before the commencement of the Olympiads; this may be +regarded as a settled date, as we see from the work of +Josephus against Apion, for the Phoenician authorities, +which he followed, are thoroughly trustworthy, and perfectly +agree with the books of Samuel and Kings in the +Old Testament. The books of Judges are of later origin, and +contain chronological impossibilities; but from the time of +David we have contemporary and quite trustworthy history; +some few erroneous dates are probably mere slips in writing. +In the reigns of Manasseh and Amon there are a few incorrect +statements, and I have shown where the mistake of from +twenty to thirty years is probably concealed,⁠<a id="FNanchor_79" href="#Footnote_79" class="fnanchor">[79]</a> but I cannot +say how the text is to be emended. After the first three +centuries, Carthage had already acquired many possessions +in Byzacene, that is, the country from the headland on the +bay to the lesser Syrtis; in Sardinia, too, it exercised a +powerful influence, and some Punic settlements already +existed in Spain. But not long before that time, Carthage +was still engaged in deadly war with the Libyans, and its rule +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_338">[338]</span>certainly did not extend to the interior of Africa. The +real greatness of the city lasted about 150 years, from about +the close of the Peloponnesian to the commencement of +the first Punic war.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Utica</span> (Atica, the Old Town, as opposed to Carthage, or +New Town) was situated not far from Carthage. The simplicity +and constant repetition of the Phoenician names +show the want of poetry in that nation; the Greeks have an +endless variety of names. <i>Utica</i> and <i>Hippo</i> are the two +old towns on that coast; they were more ancient than +Carthage, and independent of it, being sometimes even +allied with it on equal terms. This honour they retained +until the second Punic war; they also concluded treaties +with full independence, but were virtually subject to Carthage. +Hence in the war of Agathocles, both declared in +his favour, and in the same manner they acted in the war of +the mercenaries, until, in the end, they separated themselves +entirely and joined the Romans, whence, notwithstanding +their Punic origin, they remained <i>civitates foederatae</i>. It is +interesting to observe, how easily Greek culture was engrafted +upon those Punians; the Carthaginian senate, on +one occasion, found it necessary to enact a law against it,⁠<a id="FNanchor_80" href="#Footnote_80" class="fnanchor">[80]</a> +and at times Utica had a theatre, in which Greek plays, +translated into Punic, were performed. Both St. Augustin +and Apuleius (the latter was a native of Madaura in the +interior) spoke Punic as their mother tongue, whence we +see that the people throughout the province of Carthage +spoke Punic, and that the language of the Amazirghs had +become extinct. In some parts of the coast, Latin was +spoken. When the Arabs conquered the country, the +inhabitants still employed the Punic language, and the +adoption of the Arabic was facilitated by the kindred nature +of the two languages. The foreign elements in the languages +of Tunis and Malta are probably derived from that +of the Amazirghs; Latin also is mixed up with them.</p> + +<p>The coast of <i>Byzacene</i> is one of the most fertile in the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_339">[339]</span>world: the olive-tree, which is one of the richest blessings +of the temperate zone, was, strange to say, not introduced +into those parts until a late period, and that district is the +only one in which the palm and the olive-tree grow side +by side. In the earlier times, Carthage obtained its oil +from Greece and Italy. The coast was studded with towns, +just like the country of Cyrene. Notwithstanding the +destruction of Carthage, those countries were perhaps never +so well cultivated and so thickly peopled as under the +Roman emperors, especially in the reign of Severus, as is +attested by Tertullian, a contemporary writer, and by the +immense number of ruins in the territory of Tunis.</p> + +<p><i>Zeugitana</i> is the basin of the bay of Tunis. The southern +part of the eastern coast of Tunis was called <i>Byzacion</i>, +<i>Byzacene</i> or <i>Byzacitis</i>. <i>Tunis</i> deserves to be mentioned +among the provincial towns on account of its subsequent +importance, of which antiquity knows nothing.</p> + +<p>The greater part of the Carthaginian territory was given +by the Romans to Masinissa, who, by the most shameless +usurpation, and by the support of the most faithless policy +on the part of the Romans, endeavoured to make himself +master of it; for after the second Punic war, the Carthaginians +still possessed an extensive territory. Even before, +Numidia had received nearly all the districts which had +been conquered in war, such as Zama, and other places.</p> + +<p>The Numidian kings resided at <span class="smcap">Cirta</span>, that is, “the +town,” in the Punic language, which is another proof of the +poverty of its nomenclature. This town rose to greatness +under Masinissa, and still more under Micipsa, who drew +into it a Greek colony, just as in the time of Louis XIV, +French colonies were established in the north of Germany. +The time of that colony belongs to the period in which +Corinth was destroyed and the whole of Greece was devastated, +and when the poor Greeks were scattered all over the +earth. Under Constantine the Great, its name was changed +into <i>Constantina</i>, and large Roman ruins still exist there. +It was a Roman colony founded by P. Sitius of Nuceria, +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_340">[340]</span>who assembled an army of Roman fugitives and Gauls that +had served under the African princes, and received Cirta +from Julius Caesar, after the conquest of Juba, as a place to +settle in. It is, therefore, a colony of quite a peculiar kind, +differing essentially from all other colonies.</p> + +<h3 id="Aethiopia_Aegyptus"><span class="smcap">Aethiopia, Aegyptus.</span></h3> + +<p>The Ethiopians, with the earliest Greeks, are the black +people in the south-east and south-west, whence Indians +and Ethiopians are synonymous, the southern Indians being +black. I believe that the Indian peninsula was conquered +by the Indians, and that the black race was subdued by +them. Ethiopia, with the Greeks, is only a vague name +for Africa. Its derivation from αἴθω is erroneous, but it is +doubtful whether the nation had any special name by which +it designated itself. We must, however, distinguish the +<i>Leucaethiopes</i>, that is, the Fellatahs, or Fellahs, whom +Ptolemy distinctly places on the Senegal, to which locality +they are also assigned by the great D’Anville. The name +Ethiopians was afterwards limited to the Abyssinian race +and the tribes belonging to them, and these latter nations +still call their country Ithopya, though we can hardly suppose +the name to be of native origin. The excerpts from +Agatharchides of Cnidos, a most excellent writer of the +seventh century of Rome, who for a long time resided in +Egypt, but does not call the nations by their own names, +but only by appellatives, are very obscure, and have been +entirely neglected. He gives information about nations +which are found at present only in the innermost parts of +Africa: he describes, e.g., the Hottentots and Bushmen, +whom he calls Acridophagi, that is, eaters of grasshoppers, +so that even those living in the distant south were noticed +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_341">[341]</span>by him. The Hottentots cut out one of their testicles, a fact +with which he was acquainted.</p> + +<p>Ethiopia proper is highly remarkable in ancient history: +in Scripture it is called Koosh, and its kings are distinguished +from those of the Mauri. The country of these +Mauri was in very ancient times a great state in the +south of Egypt; its capital, <i>Meroe</i>, contrary to the express +testimony of the ancients, has generally been placed too +near Egypt; it was probably situated in the neighbourhood +of Sennaar. The Meroites had a peculiar kind of civilisation; +and there can be no doubt that the hieroglyphics, and +all that we afterwards find as Egyptian civilisation, originated +among them. At a very remote time they conquered +Egypt; the ancients themselves trace to them the +knowledge and religion of the Egyptians; they describe +their monuments as Ethiopian, and all that can be made +out by historical inquiry is confirmatory of this view. The +southernmost monuments of Egypt, between the two +cataracts, are the grandest and most ancient; then follows +Thebes, and as we advance northward, the monuments +become smaller and more insignificant. But monuments +are found also higher up the river to the south of Meroe. +The accounts in Diodorus about the condition of that city +are perfectly credible and satisfactory. The Egyptians, +like the Celtiberians, Celtoligyans and others, were a mixed +people, in which one nation ruled while the other obeyed. +In the Greek documents of Egypt, such as contracts, and the +like, we find a singular custom, occasioned by the extremely +small number of proper names: the notary, in order to prevent +confusion, added a description of the persons concerned. +Accordingly, we can clearly distinguish the different races, +for we find such characteristics as short, yellow, flat nose, +curly hair, and the like.⁠<a id="FNanchor_81" href="#Footnote_81" class="fnanchor">[81]</a> The most ancient idols resemble +negroes, as, for example, the celebrated Isis of Elephantine. +Among the mummies, too, there are a great many negro +forms, faces altogether non-European, different both in +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_342">[342]</span>their skulls and teeth; and this is another sign that Egypt +was conquered by the Ethiopians, who settled among the +conquered people. Champollion the younger is not only +an honest man, but has no doubt discovered the truth. The +most ancient documents we have, go back as far as the +eighteenth dynasty of Manetho; and the seventeenth and +eighteenth dynasties are probably the period when the yoke +of the Hycsos was thrown off in consequence of this conquest. +The original inhabitants were probably Libyans, +who extended as far as lake Mareotis, for Mareotis is a +Libyan name; and Egyptians, in the sense in which +Herodotus understands the name, do not occur beyond the +Canobian mouth of the Nile. The original inhabitants, +therefore, may have been under the dominion of a Semitic +race, which among the Egyptians bore the name of Hycsos, +and was intensely hated by the later Egyptians. This expulsion +of the Hycsos, which is so often represented on +monuments, was the result of the establishment of the +Kooshites in Upper Egypt, who thence also spread over +Lower Egypt. The modern Egyptians have scarcely a trace +left of the ancient physiognomy; their features are rather +Libyan. The Copts have harsh and rude features, but they +are just those of the Berbers, whence they are different +from the Arabs and Syrians. The mummies which are +brought to Europe belong to the higher castes, descended +for the most part from Ethiopians—a race which has now +disappeared: the great mass of the nation consisted of +natives. The settlement of the Egyptian warriors (μάχιμοι) +in the south of Meroe, of which Herodotus speaks, is +nothing else but another instance of the confusion of the +two poles in legends about migrations; arising from the +fact that a tribe was found in those southern parts resembling +the one ruling in Lower Egypt. The story, as it is +related, is only ridiculous. This also accounts for the +institution of castes, for wherever they exist they originate +in conquest.</p> + +<p>Upper and Lower Egypt differ most widely from each +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_343">[343]</span>other: the former is a narrow and deep valley, which is but +rarely overflowed by the river; Middle Egypt is more frequently +exposed to inundations; and Lower Egypt, in +antiquity, was put under water by every rising of the Nile; +at present it is only the districts between the arms of the +river and the neighbourhood of Damietta that are overflowed. +This is accounted for by the circumstance that +after every inundation the river leaves behind a stratum of +mud, whereby the country is constantly raised: on the +bank the different years may be traced by very thin strata, +a fact which has been unjustly denied. In ancient times, +the arms of the Nile were large rivers, while at present +ships of some size cannot sail into any of the mouths of the +river, because the bed has been so much elevated. But the +surrounding country has been raised much more; for in the +time of Herodotus all the towns were situated on hills +rising above the ground which was usually inundated; but +this is not the case now, the lower parts having been filled +up, and the extensive marshes in the Delta having, for the +most part, become arable land, while the ancient lakes are +changed into marshes. Upper Egypt must have been irrigated +by artificially raising the water. There is, moreover, this +remarkable change in the climate of Egypt, that, while in +Herodotus’ time it never rained in Upper Egypt, at present +there are occasional showers, though never without violent +thunderstorms.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Thebes</span> was the ancient capital of Upper Egypt; but it +had fallen from its greatness even before the Persian conquest, +for Psammetichus, for the sake of commerce, had +transferred the capital to Lower Egypt, and he was strong +through the support of foreigners. From that time, Thebes +was always in opposition to the rulers; it was eclipsed by +Memphis, and afterwards by Sais, but it still regarded +itself as the repository of ancient wisdom and as the venerable +seat of religion. The city was greatly deserted and +decayed; but there is no reason for doubting its immense +magnitude; its ruins are gigantic, and its temples are as vast +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_344">[344]</span>as cities. Thebes received its death-blow during the unfortunate +rebellion against Ptolemy Physcon; under the +Romans, too, it was frequently the centre of insurrection.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Ptolemais</span>, the next town after Thebes down the river, +was founded by the first or second Ptolemy against the +seditious disposition of the Thebans; it was a σύστημα +Ἑλληνικὸν in the proper sense of the term, with Greek +institutions, both public and private, and Greek was the language +of the place. By means of this city, the Ptolemies +endeavoured to keep Upper Egypt in subjection, while, on +the other hand, they admitted colonisation to Alexandria +for similar purposes, exercising their power from above +through a number of local magistrates. In other respects, +the Ptolemies did not favour Greek colonisation as much +as the Seleucidae, for they confined it to Ptolemais and +Alexandria.⁠<a id="FNanchor_82" href="#Footnote_82" class="fnanchor">[82]</a>⁠</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Memphis</span> never was comparable to Thebes in size and +importance, for it contained only very few large buildings, +of which at present no traces exist. All the buildings, such +as royal palaces and the like, must have consisted of unburnt +bricks. The city was large and populous, but it +already represents a different state of things: the transfer of +the capital to this place must be regarded as the epoch in +which the pyramids were built, that is, as the age of +Sesostris. Its citadel is called λευκὸν τεῖχος (<i>arx alba</i>, +<i>murus albus</i> is a wrong translation), just as the walls of +Moscow had different colours, and as at Ecbatana the +parapets of the different circles.⁠<a id="FNanchor_83" href="#Footnote_83" class="fnanchor">[83]</a>⁠</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Sais</span>, a still more recent capital, was built by Psammetichus +and his successors, entirely with a view to be near +the sea. In its vicinity were the <i>castra praetoria</i> of the +Ionians and Carians, by the aid of which those kings maintained +their dominion.</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Alexandria</span> was, properly speaking, situated beyond +the frontiers of Egypt, and it was only on the consideration +that water of the Nile from the arm of Canobus flowed into +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_345">[345]</span>lake Mareotis, that it could be said to belong to Egypt, for +it stood in reality on Libyan ground. It had been a much +frequented port even in the time of the Egyptian kings, +being protected by the island of Pharos at the entrance of +it; but the kings kept a garrison there for the purpose of +preventing strangers from landing. The place had formerly +been called <i>Rhacotis</i>. Alexander is justly praised +for having perceived the advantages of the locality, which +is so well fitted to form a point of communication between +Africa, Europe, and Asia: he was not generally very fortunate +in his choice of places. Alexandria was probably destined by +him to be the capital of his empire, seeing he intended to +conquer, at least, the north coast of Africa and southern +Italy, and in general all countries so far as he was not +checked by the temperate zone and his own ambition. Of +the city founded by Alexander, every trace has disappeared, +and all that remains belongs to the Roman period. The +city rose with wonderful rapidity, and three distinct bodies +of citizens were formed in it. The noblest consisted of +Macedonians and Greeks, who, like Greek citizens, were +divided into phylae and demi. The intention was that it +should appear as a free city; and the Macedonians and +Greeks were according to all appearance, not kept distinct. +The second part, consisting of a numerous Jewish colony, +formed a demos, enjoying civil, but no political, rights; +these Jews were not allowed to dwell in three out of the +five regions into which the city was divided. The third +body, which in point of numbers was the largest, consisted +of native Egyptians, who, however, were regarded almost +as bondsmen, like the Lettonians and Esthonians at Reval +and Riga. Cleomenes, by Alexander’s command the +founder of Alexandria, was a wicked adventurer, but an +able man. The city rose greatly even under the first +Ptolemy; but it afterwards continued to increase in consequence +of its extremely favourable situation. It was the +legitimate staple of commerce, which had there its necessary +centre; it was almost in the exclusive enjoyment of the +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_346">[346]</span>trade with Egypt, Africa, Arabia, and India. Ptolemy +Physcon destroyed the greater part of the Macedonian and +Greek inhabitants. Caesar’s war was very destructive, +for the struggle was carried on in the very streets of the +city; and from that time the suburb in the island of Pharos +remained deserted; at least under Tiberius it still was so. +During the empire, Alexandria was the scene of several +insurrections; the one occurring in the reign of Diocletian +was fearful, but that emperor took such bloody revenge, +that the city probably never recovered; and for a century +afterwards the whole part called Bruchion was quite uninhabited. +D’Anville has made a ground-plan of Alexandria.</p> + +<p>The island of <i>Pharos</i> was situated in front of the city, +and between it and the coast there were excellent places for +anchoring, which communicated with one another, but were +separated by cliffs. The Ptolemies constructed a causeway +across the narrow channel by means of draw-bridges. Thus +arose the two harbours, the old and the new one, which are +at present separated by a neck of land, but are much +inferior to what they were in antiquity; they have been +spoiled during a long period of barbarous neglect, and +especially by throwing ballast overboard. The ships of +the Mahommedans enter only the western port, which is the +safer one. The island of Pharos contained the celebrated +light-house, one of the improvements of an age in which +the feelings and the heart had already become greatly +deteriorated, but in which the mechanical arts had made +considerable progress. Lucian, who often embellishes +history, here also furnishes a story which is as absurd as it +well can be. He says that Sostratus of Cnidus built this +light-house, and that, against the will of Ptolemy, he caused +his own name to be engraved under the inscription in praise +of the king.⁠<a id="FNanchor_84" href="#Footnote_84" class="fnanchor">[84]</a> But according to Strabo, Sostratos was the +king’s minister, and acquired the special favour of his +sovereign by building the light-house at his own expense. +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_347">[347]</span>The inscription, Σώστρατος Δεξιφανοῦς Κνίδιος θεοῖς +σωτῆρσιν ὑπὲρ τῶν πλωιζομένων is quite in the style of +the time; the θεοὶ σωτῆρες are Ptolemy and Berenice. The +whole space between the harbour and lake Mareotis was +occupied by the city of Alexandria, and in the time of Augustus +a large suburb is said to have existed at a distance of +thirty stadia from the city, in the direction of Canobus. +Alexandria is a classical place in the history of nations and +of literature: it was the residence of Eratosthenes, the first +geographer we meet with in the history of the world.⁠<a id="FNanchor_85" href="#Footnote_85" class="fnanchor">[85]</a>⁠</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Naucratis</span>, below Sais in Lower Egypt, was a Greek +settlement, under the supremacy of Egypt, nearly in the +same manner in which Macao is a Portuguese town: Greeks +dwelt there and had their own magistrate, or, so to speak, +their own consul. Many authors are said to have been +natives of the place; Phylarchus, e.g., is called Naucratites, +but it was mere pedantry and affectation to speak of Naucratis +instead of Alexandria as the Greek city.</p> + +<p>The Egyptian towns generally had two names, one +Egyptian and the other Greek; the native names are +preserved in Coptic fragments, and have been made out by +Champollion; a map also has been made with these names. +The modern names are formed from the Arabic.</p> + +<h3 id="Some_more_Greek_Colonies"><span class="smcap">Some more Greek Colonies.</span></h3> + +<p><span class="smcap">Phaselis</span>, on the coast of Lycia, was a Doric colony; +but the date of its foundation is unknown. The place +deserves to be noticed as the frontier town between Greece +and the barbarians, in what is commonly called the peace +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_348">[348]</span>of Cimon. This peace probably never existed as a regular +treaty of peace, but there certainly was a treaty between +the Greeks and the satraps of Asia Minor, which the +later Greeks, contrary to historical truth, extended into a +peace.⁠<a id="FNanchor_86" href="#Footnote_86" class="fnanchor">[86]</a>⁠</p> + +<p><span class="smcap">Pamphylia</span> is a country full of large and flourishing +towns, of which we have numerous coins with a peculiar +language, and an alphabet akin to the Greek; these coins +have all the beauty of Greek art, and we may well ask, +whether Greece ever had anything more beautiful. The +Cilician coins, especially those of Tarsus, are of the same +kind. We do not know to what race those people belonged; +certain it is that they were not barbarians any more than +the Lycians and Lydians. In regard to intellectual culture +and political organisation, they were equal to the Greeks. +Lycia had a very happy federative constitution, quite +in the spirit and according to the principles of the Greeks.</p> + +<h3 id="Cyprus"><span class="smcap">Cyprus.</span></h3> + +<p>The only Greek colonies in that eastern part of the sea +occur in Cyprus; but we are not informed by any one +author at what time they were established. The statement, +that Teucer founded Salamis, refutes itself, and all the +traditions about colonies referring to the Trojan times +are worthless; they either mean generally that the colonies +belong to a very early time, or they are inventions. We +cannot now determine in what manner Salamis in Cyprus +arose, and we are not in a condition to say as to whether +the island of Salamis off the coast of Attica ever was +sufficiently flourishing to send out colonies. The Greek +settlements in Cyprus were connected with very great +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_349">[349]</span>difficulties. We see this from the prophets, for their Chittim +is no doubt Cyprus; subsequently the name became more +extended, for in the books of Maccabees it also comprises +Greece, including even Macedonia. Hence the name of +<i>Citium</i>, the Phoenician capital of the island, is nothing else +but Chittim. In the time of the prophets, the island was +under the dominion of the Phoenician cities; and we may +ask, how could Greeks establish themselves there? This +question may be answered from the Old Testament and +from the fragments of Berosus in Eusebius. It can have +been no other period than that during which Nebuchadnezzar +carried on his protracted wars in Phoenicia and +Syria, and destroyed ancient Tyre, in consequence of which +the Phoenicians were very much reduced. It is also possible +that the somewhat earlier expeditions of Sanherib and +Assarhaddon may have been the occasion. We know, +from Berosus, that, in Olymp. 20, a Greek army landed in +Cilicia, which is a sign of a commotion among the Greeks +at that time, about which history furnishes no information. +I connect these movements with the extensive emigration +of the Greeks and Carians who entered the service of +Psammetichus in Egypt. Accordingly, we may assume +that the Greek settlements in Cyprus were founded between +Olymp. 20 and 40; and we cannot wonder that, one +hundred and twenty years later, during the war of Darius +Hystaspis, the Greek towns of Cyprus had already become +great.</p> + +<p>The principal places, <i>Salamis</i> and <i>Amathus</i>, were as purely +Greek as the cities in Asia Minor; <i>Lapathos</i> and others +were smaller. In the time of Evagoras, after the Peloponnesian +war, Salamis was the ruling city of the island, and +in reality sovereign. <i>Soli</i> is absurdly connected with +Solon.</p> + +<p>In later times, Greeks and Phoenicians lived peaceably +together in the island. <i>Citium</i> was the capital of the +Phoenicians, and the native place of the philosopher Zeno. +We have no information about the race of the native +<span class="pagenum" id="Page_350">[350]</span>Cyprians; but, under the predominating influence of the +two ruling nations, they became partly Hellenised and +partly Punicised.</p> + +<p>Cyprus is justly called by the ancients one of the most +blessed countries in the world; there are but few parts of +it which are unhealthy. Its rich copper mines and its +timber were of particular importance to the ancients.</p> + +<h3 id="Phoenicia"><span class="smcap">Phoenicia.</span></h3> + +<p>The Phoenicians extended from the frontiers of the +Philistines to those of Cilicia near Myriandros. It is an +ancient tradition, that they had immigrated into that +country from a distance, and this tradition is confirmed +by its situation; it is quite clear that they cannot have +been the original natives. Of the northern towns, it is +quite certain, that they were colonies of those in the south. +Would that we had their history, which was quite authentic +up to a very remote period! They were a nation which +had been pressed onward from the south towards the north. +According to a tradition in Herodotus, they had come +from the Red Sea, and according to another, from the +Persian gulf. The latter of these, which has much engaged +the attention of modern historians, is of no value at all. +It would seem most probable, that they were one of those +nations that were pressed onward by the emigration of the +Hycsos.</p> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="footnotes"> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="FOOTNOTES">FOOTNOTES</h2> + +</div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_1" href="#FNanchor_1" class="label">[1]</a> <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, vol. i. p. 130.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_2" href="#FNanchor_2" class="label">[2]</a> “Not <i>Junia Norbana</i>. Laws with two qualifying adjectives +always had two authors, but our law originated with L. Junius Norbanus.” +According to a more recent view, the Norbani belonged to +the Vibii, and the name <i>Junia</i> in our law is derived from M. Junius +Silanus, who was consul in <span class="allsmcap">A.D.</span> 19.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_3" href="#FNanchor_3" class="label">[3]</a> <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, vol. i. p. 81, foll.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_4" href="#FNanchor_4" class="label">[4]</a> Sismondi, <i>Hist. des Republ. Italiennes</i>, i. p. 249; but he explains +the name to mean <i>la grande côte</i>; it moreover belongs to the ninth +century as a surname of Grimoald II.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_5" href="#FNanchor_5" class="label">[5]</a> <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, i. p. 194, note 560.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_6" href="#FNanchor_6" class="label">[6]</a> <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, vol. i. p. 389, foll.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_7" href="#FNanchor_7" class="label">[7]</a> “I am of opinion that this hill did not belong to the Aventine: +I have heard this at Rome from a man, in whom I do not place +much confidence; he may perhaps have read it somewhere: there +is so much that is indifferent in books, that we often pass over that +which is of importance because we imagine it to be indifferent.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_8" href="#FNanchor_8" class="label">[8]</a> <i>Lect. on Rom. Hist.</i>, vol. i. p. 60, 3d edit.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_9" href="#FNanchor_9" class="label">[9]</a> Respecting this flight of steps, however, see Urlichs in the +<i>Beschreibung der Stadt Rom.</i> vol. iii. 2, p. 373, and the same author +in his <i>Beschreib. Roms</i>, p. 256.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_10" href="#FNanchor_10" class="label">[10]</a> v. § 153, ed. Müller, who, however, gives his own conjecture <i>ad +muri speciem</i> instead of the common reading <i>a muri parte</i>. The +MSS. have <i>a muris partem</i>.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_11" href="#FNanchor_11" class="label">[11]</a> In one set of notes, the following passage occurs on p. 53, after +the word “necropolis,” line 17 from foot, and may perhaps be introduced +here: “There was no road between the Aventine and the +river; outside the Porta Collina, Esquilina, Caelimontana, and +Carmentalis no enlargement of the city could take place.”—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_12" href="#FNanchor_12" class="label">[12]</a> Compare Bunsen in the <i>Beschreib. der Stadt Rom</i>, i. p. 646, foll.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_13" href="#FNanchor_13" class="label">[13]</a> Some MSS. here have a name, which seems to suggest the <i>Porta +Pia</i>. Bunsen says, “at the juncture of the street of the Porta Pia +with the street of Porta Salara” (<i>Beschreib. d. Stadt Rom</i>, i. p. 625).—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_14" href="#FNanchor_14" class="label">[14]</a> See the <i>Beschreib. der Stadt Rom</i>, iii. 1. p. 490.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_15" href="#FNanchor_15" class="label">[15]</a> Compare above, p. <a href="#Page_58">58</a>.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_16" href="#FNanchor_16" class="label">[16]</a> I have supplied this name, the MSS. containing something which +is evidently quite misunderstood.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_17" href="#FNanchor_17" class="label">[17]</a> Comp. <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, vol. iii. p. 304, note 518.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_18" href="#FNanchor_18" class="label">[18]</a> “I will mention only one example, to show how rich the Roman +gildings were. In the Forum of Trajan the letters of an inscription +were cut into the rock, and the letters themselves consisting of gilt +metal were sunk into the openings. This is the method according +to which the letters of inscriptions were generally put. In others +the bronze letters were nailed to the wall, traces of which +are still visible on the triumphal arch at Nismes, and French +scholars have very ingeniously attempted from these holes of the +nails to make out the whole inscription. In the Forum of Trajan +a bronze letter has been found, the gilding of which was valued at +a ducat; all the rest had of course been carried off as plunder.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_19" href="#FNanchor_19" class="label">[19]</a> See, however, the <i>Beschreib. d. Stadt Rom</i>, iii. 1. p. 22, foll.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_20" href="#FNanchor_20" class="label">[20]</a> In one MS. the words “the Curia” are here added; is perhaps +the Curia Julia meant?—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_21" href="#FNanchor_21" class="label">[21]</a> <i>Fast.</i> i. 707; some MSS. have Dionysius.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_22" href="#FNanchor_22" class="label">[22]</a> <i>Calig.</i> 22. I owe this reference to the kindness of Professor +Urlichs, who further observes: “Niebuhr was thinking of this +passage, and combines two facts contained in it, for Suetonius does +not expressly say, that the arch built by Caligula passed over +the temple of Castor.”—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_23" href="#FNanchor_23" class="label">[23]</a> Bunsen in the <i>Beschreib. der Stadt Rom</i>, + Pref. xl., iii. 2. p. 33.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_24" href="#FNanchor_24" class="label">[24]</a> Compare Bunsen, <i>l. c.</i> Pref. p. xxiix.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_25" href="#FNanchor_25" class="label">[25]</a> More accurately in 1257; comp. <i>Beschreib. d. Stadt. Rom</i>, + i. p. 247.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_26" href="#FNanchor_26" class="label">[26]</a> The so-called <i>Basis Capitolina</i>, Gruter, <i>Inscript.</i> <span class="allsmcap">CCL.</span>, + reprinted +in Becker’s <i>Handbuch d. Röm. Alterthümer</i>, vol. i. p. 717; compare +Bunsen in the <i>Beschreib. d. Stadt Rom</i>, vol. i. p. 174.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_27" href="#FNanchor_27" class="label">[27]</a> Livy, i. 35.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_28" href="#FNanchor_28" class="label">[28]</a> “We still want a political history of Rome, which would show +that a very great deal that is praiseworthy is to be said of many a +pope.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_29" href="#FNanchor_29" class="label">[29]</a> Epist. xiii. 1.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_30" href="#FNanchor_30" class="label">[30]</a> Muratori, <i>Antiq. Ital. med. aevi</i>, i., p. 101; the passage here +quoted occurs in p. 108; Pertz, <i>Monum. Germ. Legum</i>, ii., p. 187, who +assigns this <i>Ordo Coronationis</i> to the year 1191; the book of +Cencius, <i>Liber censuum Romanae Ecclesiae</i>, was written in 1192.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_31" href="#FNanchor_31" class="label">[31]</a> See <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, vol. i., p. 204.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_32" href="#FNanchor_32" class="label">[32]</a> Vol. ii. p. 507, foll.; comp. <i>Lect. on Rom. Hist.</i> vol. i. p. 248, +3d edit.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_33" href="#FNanchor_33" class="label">[33]</a> Comp. <i>Lect. on Rom. Hist.</i>, vol. i. p. 149, 3d edit, which passage +belongs to the Lectures delivered in 1828-29. In the <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, +vol. i. p. 101, and ii. p. 82, however, the Sabine origin of the Hernicans +is considered more probable. The number forty also is connected +with this view, because the number four is Sabine. I will therefore +not suppress the fact, that most of my MSS. have <i>fourteen</i> instead +of <i>forty</i>, which may possibly contain a different combination, though +I have been unable to divine what it can be.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_34" href="#FNanchor_34" class="label">[34]</a> In the third vol. of the new edition; as for the special passages, +see the Index to it.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_35" href="#FNanchor_35" class="label">[35]</a> <i>Aen.</i> vii. 744.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_36" href="#FNanchor_36" class="label">[36]</a> <i>Aen.</i> x. 708.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_37" href="#FNanchor_37" class="label">[37]</a> Virgil, <i>Aen.</i> vii. 206.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_38" href="#FNanchor_38" class="label">[38]</a> <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, vol. ii. p. 93, notes 194 and 195.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_39" href="#FNanchor_39" class="label">[39]</a> Our authorities state 20,000; but Niebuhr seems to mean +families, as only fathers of three children were admitted. Cicero, +however, thinks that the <i>ager Campanus</i> was not sufficient for more +than 5000 persons. The most important passages relating to this +subject are collected in Orelli, <i>Index Leg.</i> s.v., <i>Lex Julia Agraria</i> +p. 188.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_40" href="#FNanchor_40" class="label">[40]</a> This is a mistake, or else an error in the MSS., for Nesis is +mentioned by Cicero, <i>ad Att.</i> xvi. 1, 1; 3, 6; 4, 1; and by Seneca +<i>Ep.</i> 53.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_41" href="#FNanchor_41" class="label">[41]</a> “It is a great mistake to believe that a period must be better +known the nearer it is to us. This is not the case in antiquity. +There can be no doubt that, e.g., we know the internal condition of +Rome in the time of Cicero much better than during the second +century after Christ, when we know nothing but what can be +gathered from Pliny’s letters. A merely mechanical mind imagines +that a period about which nothing is written, had nothing worth +knowing; but whoever has an eye for the remains of antiquity, sees +distinctly what has existed. Thus, for example, the <i>monte testaccio</i>, +<i>mons testaceus</i> or <i>testarius</i> at Rome is not mentioned anywhere until we +come to the documents of the seventh and eighth centuries, and the +most ridiculous pains have been taken to discover it at an earlier +period. It is not mentioned in the Regionaria, hence, it is said, it must +have arisen afterwards, about the period of the eighth century, when +Rome was a desert. The matter can be explained very simply. +Every one who has practised eyes, knows what is to be recognised in +those thousands of shells; but there are antiquaries who can see +nothing at all except what they read in books. The ancients made +very little use of wooden vessels, they nearly always used pottery +ware. This produced an enormous quantity of shells. It was +thought inexpedient to throw them into the river, and there must +have been some police regulation, that all shells should be thrown +on one heap. I was on the spot when a wall was dug out, and it +was found that the heaps of shells extended up to the very walls of +the city. I caused the digging to be continued farther, and found +shells everywhere. It must have been a marsh which was filled +with shells to a depth of five feet. Under Honorius a wall was +built to defend Rome against the barbarians; it has a double +inscription, in one of which we read <i>egestis immensis ruderibus</i>. +Under Augustus a regular police was instituted, and all shells were +regularly thrown there. Now, imagine Rome with nearly a million +of inhabitants; assuredly many carts were employed every day in +carrying away the broken vessels, which were all thrown on one +spot, and may have already filled the whole place. When Aurelian +built his wall, a portion was perhaps thrown back, and this may +have been the beginning of the hill. According to Andr. Fulvius, +the wall of the city under pope Clement VII., at the commencement +of the sixteenth century, was so much covered on both sides, that +it was impossible to walk there: a road was then made, and part of +the rubbish was carried to the Forum, which was filled with it. +Such you must imagine the <i>rudera immensa egesta</i> to have been. +About the time of Honorius the wall had been cleared, not to have +a hill outside, on which the Goths might have planted their engines +to harass the city. He removed the rubbish on both sides, and +thus raised an immense mound of shells. This explanation is as +certain as if it were described in ancient authors, though not a +single author speaks of it. Such also is the case with other +phenomena which present themselves at Rome, and about which not +one passage can be referred to.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_42" href="#FNanchor_42" class="label">[42]</a> Niebuhr was probably thinking of <i>Dial.</i> iv. 55, though Puteoli is +not mentioned there, but Taurania, a place assumed to have existed +in Campania.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_43" href="#FNanchor_43" class="label">[43]</a> Comp. Seneca, <i>Epist.</i> 57.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_44" href="#FNanchor_44" class="label">[44]</a> Comp. <i>Lect. on Rom. Hist.</i> vol. i. p. 348, foll., 3d edit.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_45" href="#FNanchor_45" class="label">[45]</a> “I know that Greek inscriptions have also been discovered at +Ravenna.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_46" href="#FNanchor_46" class="label">[46]</a> “I have adopted the ancient practice of calling the whole nation +Sabellians, and the original tribe Sabines, because there is no instance +of the Samnites, Marsians, etc., having been called Sabines, +but only Sabellians.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_47" href="#FNanchor_47" class="label">[47]</a> Compare <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, vol. i. p. 64, foll.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_48" href="#FNanchor_48" class="label">[48]</a> This is the date in the MSS., but it ought probably to be +1720.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_49" href="#FNanchor_49" class="label">[49]</a> This alludes to the war between the Greeks and Turks in +1828.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_50" href="#FNanchor_50" class="label">[50]</a> Il buon Braccio; <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, vol. iii. p. 415, note 713.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_51" href="#FNanchor_51" class="label">[51]</a> “I mean the ancient one, whose scholia have now been discovered; +for there also is another scholiast belonging to the middle ages, +who is imperfect and bad, and belongs to the period of decay. The +ancient one lived at the best period of Latin grammarians.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_52" href="#FNanchor_52" class="label">[52]</a> vii. 29 ed. Müller.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_53" href="#FNanchor_53" class="label">[53]</a> “Pronounce <i>Arpīnum</i>, but <i>Arimĭnum</i>; I say this, because I +have heard many otherwise good scholars say <i>Arimīnum</i>.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_54" href="#FNanchor_54" class="label">[54]</a> Comp. <i>Lect. on Rom. Hist.</i> vol. iii. p. 138.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_55" href="#FNanchor_55" class="label">[55]</a> “Do not allow yourselves to be misguided by my occasionally +departing from the regular division, for I follow the historical connection +subsisting between the towns.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_56" href="#FNanchor_56" class="label">[56]</a> There is probably some mistake here; for what was said on +that occasion is, that Greece ought not to be deprived of one of its +eyes. It was Gelon, who, using a similar metaphor, spoke of “the +spring being taken out of Greece,” when he was invited to take part +in the war against the Persians (Herod. vii. 162).—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_57" href="#FNanchor_57" class="label">[57]</a> ix. 37.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_58" href="#FNanchor_58" class="label">[58]</a> Comp. <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, vol. i. p. 34, note 89.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_59" href="#FNanchor_59" class="label">[59]</a> The words in inverted commas have been supplied by me; +comp. Ascon. <i>Comm. in Pison.</i>, p. 3, ed. Orelli.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_60" href="#FNanchor_60" class="label">[60]</a> These two dates occur in some MSS., but can scarcely be +correct; the earlier eruption mentioned by Thucydides belongs to +Olymp. 75, 2; and it seems impossible to ascertain the date of the +first. Comp. Ullrich, <i>Beiträge zur Erklär. des Thukydides</i>, p. 92, +foll.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_61" href="#FNanchor_61" class="label">[61]</a> “The <i>Siculi</i> were the natives, and the <i>Siceliots</i> the Greeks who +had settled in the island. Similarly the Romans sometimes distinguished +between <i>Siculi</i> and <i>Sicilienses</i>, but not by far as consistently +as the Greeks, for no Greek ever confounded the two.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_62" href="#FNanchor_62" class="label">[62]</a> According to Berghaus, <i>Länder- und Völkerkunde</i>, iii. p. 404, it +is found also in Corsica, Greece, and the Greek Archipelago.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_63" href="#FNanchor_63" class="label">[63]</a> The more correct view is given by Berghaus, <i>l. c.</i> p. 460.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_64" href="#FNanchor_64" class="label">[64]</a> ii. 85: <i>si ob gravitatem coeli interissent</i>.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_65" href="#FNanchor_65" class="label">[65]</a> + This name is only a conjecture of mine; one MS. has <i>Colero</i>.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_66" href="#FNanchor_66" class="label">[66]</a> More correctly in 634, M. Porcio Catone, Q. Marcio Rege Coss. +See <i>Vell. Pat.</i> i. 15.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_67" href="#FNanchor_67" class="label">[67]</a> “Geography is a pleasant and easy study: the vivid representations +it furnishes us of localities, often enable us clearly to +understand an historical event; we often see, e.g., why a victory +was not followed up, or how it might have been followed up. I do +not like to set myself up as a pattern, but when I was a young man +of your age, or even younger (I was scarcely seventeen years old), +I read Strabo with the greatest attention. Whenever I had read +a book, I endeavoured to reproduce it by writing down an abstract +of it. It is not advisable to rely on books; and I therefore endeavoured +to produce the substance in another form. Those who go +through Strabo in this manner, even in their leisure hours, cannot +fail to acquire a thorough knowledge of geography. Let those who +have any taste for chorography read books of travel and similar +works, as for example, Bory de St. Vincent, <i>Tableau de la peninsule +de l’Ibérie</i>, or Alex. Laborde, <i>Tableau de l’Espagne</i>, which are especially +valuable in assisting us to understand Livy’s account of the +Spanish war. Strabo’s description of Spain is particularly excellent, +but he is too often carried away by his learning and his desire to +explain the Homeric poems; by reading his description you acquire +an indelible and correct picture of Spain. A scholar must read the +ancient authors systematically and repeatedly, sometimes with one +particular object in view, and sometimes with another.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_68" href="#FNanchor_68" class="label">[68]</a> In Aristotle, <i>Probl.</i> xvii. 3: τοὺς ἀνθρώπους φησὶν Ἀλκμαίων διὰ +τοῦτο ἀπόλλυσθαι, ὅτι οὐ δύνανται ἀρχὴν τῷ τέλει προσάψαι.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_69" href="#FNanchor_69" class="label">[69]</a> See above, p. <a href="#Page_33">33</a>.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_70" href="#FNanchor_70" class="label">[70]</a> Comp. <i>Kleine Schrift.</i> vol. i. p. 384.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_71" href="#FNanchor_71" class="label">[71]</a> See, however, <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, vol. ii. p. 527.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_72" href="#FNanchor_72" class="label">[72]</a> p. 2031, ed. Putsch.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_73" href="#FNanchor_73" class="label">[73]</a> The restoration of the text here is uncertain, for towards the +end of these Lectures the number of MSS. becomes smaller +and smaller, and some of the best do not contain the last +Lectures at all.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_74" href="#FNanchor_74" class="label">[74]</a> “The <i>Cimmerians</i> on the Euxine cannot be connected with these +occurrences, for they belong to a period about two centuries earlier +than that at which the Cymri can possibly have arrived in those +parts.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_75" href="#FNanchor_75" class="label">[75]</a> <i>Kleine Schrift.</i>, vol. i. p. 352, foll.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_76" href="#FNanchor_76" class="label">[76]</a> According to some of the Fathers, he threw himself into the +Euripus, because he had been unable to discover the law by which +the currents of the sea were regulated.—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_77" href="#FNanchor_77" class="label">[77]</a> One MS. here has the addition “As Constantinople is by the +wall S. Floriano.” Should it not be S. Romano?—<span class="smcap">Ed.</span></p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_78" href="#FNanchor_78" class="label">[78]</a> Should be thirty-eight; see <i>Hist. of Rome</i>, vol. i. p. 271.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_79" href="#FNanchor_79" class="label">[79]</a> <i>Kleine Schrift.</i>, vol. i. p. 209, note.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_80" href="#FNanchor_80" class="label">[80]</a> Justin, xx. 5.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_81" href="#FNanchor_81" class="label">[81]</a> Comp. <i>Lect. on Anc. Hist.</i> vol. i. p. 46, foll.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_82" href="#FNanchor_82" class="label">[82]</a> Comp. <i>Lect. on Anc. Hist.</i> vol. iii. p. 298, note 3.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_83" href="#FNanchor_83" class="label">[83]</a> Herod. i. 98.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_84" href="#FNanchor_84" class="label">[84]</a> Lucian, <i>Quom. Hist. Conscrib. sit. 62</i>. “Lucian’s story about +Herodotus is equally devoid of historical foundation.”</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_85" href="#FNanchor_85" class="label">[85]</a> It is certain that in the time of the Roman emperors, the +Alexandrians pronounced Alexándreia, and they probably did so +even under the Ptolemies; the Alexandrian dialect is in fact the +root of the modern Greek.</p></div> + +<div class="footnote"><p><a id="Footnote_86" href="#FNanchor_86" class="label">[86]</a> Comp. <i>Lect. on Ancient Hist.</i>, vol. ii. p. 9.</p></div> + +</div> + +<hr class="chap x-ebookmaker-drop"> + +<div class="chapter"> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_351">[351]</span></p> + +<h2 class="nobreak" id="INDEX">INDEX.</h2> + +</div> + +<ul> + +<li class="ifrst">Abantes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Abdera, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_212">212</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Abella, ii. <a href="#Page_127">127</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aborigines, ii. <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_147">147</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Abruzzi, ii. <a href="#Page_11">11</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Abydos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_218">218</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_235">235</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Academia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acanthus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_231">231</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acarnanes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_125">125</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acarnania, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_147">147</a> foll., <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_265">265</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acciajuoli, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_107">107</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acerrae, ii. <a href="#Page_127">127</a>, <a href="#Page_132">132</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Achaei, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Achaean towns in Magna Graecia, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Achaia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_79">79</a> + foll., <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_151">151</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Achaia Phthiotis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_164">164</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acharnae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_110">110</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Achelous">Achelous, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_144">144</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_256">256</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acheron, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_257">257</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acheruntia, ii. <a href="#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acherusian Lake, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_256">256</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Achradina, ii. <a href="#Page_258">258</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Achrida, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_309">309</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acqua di Trevi, ii. <a href="#Page_88">88</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acra, ii. <a href="#Page_264">264</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acragas, ii. <a href="#Page_261">261</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acridophagi, ii. <a href="#Page_340">340</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acroceraunia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_255">255</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acrocorinthus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_46">46</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Actaea tellus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_42">42</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acte, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_85">85</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Actium, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_152">152</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Acusilaus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_11">11</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Adjectives in <i>ius</i> and <i>ianus</i>, ii. <a href="#Page_84">84</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ad Martis, ii. <a href="#Page_55">55</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aeas, see <a href="#Aous">Aous</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx" id="Aedui">Aedui, ii. <a href="#Page_312">312</a>, <a href="#Page_317">317</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aegae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Aegeae (in Macedonia), <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_278">278</a> foll., <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_290">290</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aegean sea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_182">182</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aegialea, Aegialos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_82">82</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aegina, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_196">196</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">temple of Zeus Hellenios and its sculptures, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_55">55</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aegion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_82">82</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aegira, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aegirussa, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_87">87</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aegyptus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_21">21</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aegyptus (the Nile), ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aelian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_158">158</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aemilia, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Aemonia">Aemonia or Haemonia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aenaria, ii. <a href="#Page_135">135</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aenea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_289">289</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aenianes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aenos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aeolis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_206">206</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_215">215</a> foll.</li> + +<li class="indx">Aepy, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aepys, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_58">58</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aequani, ii. <a href="#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aequi, ii. <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="#Page_120">120</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aequi Falisci, ii. <a href="#Page_229">229</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aequiculi, ii. <a href="#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aequicus, ii. <a href="#Page_254">254</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aequuli, ii. <a href="#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aeschines, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_19">19</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aeschylus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_119">119</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_8">8</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aesernia, ii. <a href="#Page_164">164</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aethalia, ii. <a href="#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aethiopia, ii. <a href="#Page_340">340</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aetna, ii. <a href="#Page_256">256</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aetoli, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_125">125</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_137">137</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_254">254</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aetolia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_136">136</a> foll., <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aetolian mountains, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_157">157</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Afri, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Africa, ii. <a href="#Page_327">327</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Africanus, Julius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_51">51</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agamemnon’s kingdom, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_33">33</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agatha, ii. <a href="#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agatharchides, ii. <a href="#Page_340">340</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agathocles, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_88">88</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_261">261</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agger, the, of Servius Tullius, ii. <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agiadae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_56">56</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_58">58</a> <i>n.</i>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_4">4</a></li> + +<li class="indx">S. Agnolo, in Pescivendolo, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_238">238</a> <i>n.</i> 2</li> + +<li class="indx">Agora at Athens, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_98">98</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Piraeeus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_102">102</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agraei, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_147">147</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_270">270</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agrianes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_296">296</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_352">[352]</span>Agrigentum, ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_262">262</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agrimensores, ii. <a href="#Page_229">229</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agrippa, ii. <a href="#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agrippina, ii. <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agylla, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_223">223</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Agyrion, ii. <a href="#Page_270">270</a>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aix, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alabaster, ii. <a href="#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alalia, ii. <a href="#Page_278">278</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alaric, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_50">50</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alemanni, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_306">306</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_251">251</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alba, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_115">115</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_126">126</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alba Longa, ii. <a href="#Page_107">107</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alba in Picenum, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alban hills, ii. <a href="#Page_12">12</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Albanese, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_301">301</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_178">178</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Albanus Lacus, ii. <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Albanus mons, ii. <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alberti, Battista, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_7">7</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alcaeus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_219">219</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alcmaeon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_148">148</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alcmaeon, the Pythagorean, ii. <a href="#Page_296">296</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aleria, ii. <a href="#Page_278">278</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aleuadae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_164">164</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alexander, son of Craterus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_49">49</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alexander, son of Philip, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_198">198</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_264">264</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alexander Aetolus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_144">144</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alexander Severus, ii. <a href="#Page_57">57</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alexandria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_233">233</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_264">264</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_344">344</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alexandrian School, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_223">223</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alfaterna, ii. <a href="#Page_143">143</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Algarvia, ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Algidus, ii. <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_121">121</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a>; comp. <a href="#Elis">Elis</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Allifae, ii. <a href="#Page_164">164</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Allobroges, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alopeconnesus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_235">235</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alpes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_284">284</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alpes Maritimae, ii. <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_17">17</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alpes Cottiae, Graiae, Juliae Nepontiae, ii. <a href="#Page_18">18</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Noricae Penninae, Raeticae, ii. <a href="#Page_18">18</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alpes Apenninae, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alpes, a region of Italy, ii. <a href="#Page_29">29</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alpis Cottia, Alpes Cottiae, region of Italy, ii. <a href="#Page_29">29</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alpes Penninae, region of Italy, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alphabets, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alpheus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alsium, ii. <a href="#Page_223">223</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aluntium, ii. <a href="#Page_270">270</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Alyzia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_152">152</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amalfi, ii. <a href="#Page_167">167</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amantia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_306">306</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amasea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_20">20</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amastris, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_250">250</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_251">251</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amathus, ii. <a href="#Page_349">349</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amazirgh, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ambracia, see <a href="#Ampracia">Ampracia</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Amisus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_248">248</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_249">249</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amiternum, ii. <a href="#Page_149">149</a>, <a href="#Page_150">150</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ammianus Marcellinus, ii. <a href="#Page_281">281</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amorgos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_190">190</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amphictyones, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_129">129</a> foll., <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amphilochii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_147">147</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_259">259</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_263">263</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_265">265</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_269">269</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_280">280</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Amphipolis">Amphipolis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_232">232</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_294">294</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amphipolis in Syria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amphissa, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_124">124</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amphitheatrum, ii. <a href="#Page_91">91</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amphitheatrum Castrense, ii. <a href="#Page_93">93</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amphitheatrum Flavium, ii. <a href="#Page_91">91</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amphitheatrum Statilii Tauri, ii. <a href="#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amphitheatrum vivarium, ii. <a href="#Page_93">93</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Ampracia">Ampracia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_138">138</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_149">149</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_263">263</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_265">265</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_270">270</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_280">280</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ampracian Gulf, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_151">151</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ampurias, ii. <a href="#Page_294">294</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amurath, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_50">50</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Amyclae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_61">61</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Anagnia, ii. <a href="#Page_116">116</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Anacreon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_211">211</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Anactorion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_149">149</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_152">152</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Anaphe, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_190">190</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Anas, ii. <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Anauros, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_169">169</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Anaxagoras, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_212">212</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Anaximander, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_208">208</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Anaximenes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_208">208</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ancon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_152">152</a>; comp. <a href="#Ancona">Ancona</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx" id="Ancona">Ancona, ii. <a href="#Page_152">152</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Andalusia, ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Andania, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Andros, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">S. Angelo, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_63">63</a>; comp. <a href="#Malea">Malea</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">S. Angelo in Pescaria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_238">238</a> <i>n.</i> 2</li> + +<li class="indx">S. Angelo, castle of, ii. <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Angli, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_135">135</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Anio">Anio, ii. <a href="#Page_21">21</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Anthedon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_117">117</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Anthemus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_289">289</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antibes, ii. <a href="#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Anticyra, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_133">133</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antigonea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_268">268</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antigonea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_73">73</a>; comp. <a href="#Mantinea">Mantinea</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Antigonids, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antigonus Gonatas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_49">49</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antigonus Carystius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antioch, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_234">234</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antiochus of Syracuse, ii. <a href="#Page_188">188</a>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antiparos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_186">186</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antipater, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_292">292</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antipater’s poem on Corinth, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_50">50</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antipolis, ii. <a href="#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antium, ii. <a href="#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Antoninus, emperor, ii. <a href="#Page_57">57</a></li> + +<li class="indx">d’Anville, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_18">18</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_45">45</a> <i>n.</i>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_227">227</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_257">257</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_289">289</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_127">127</a>, <a href="#Page_158">158</a>, <a href="#Page_340">340</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_353">[353]</span>Anxur, see <a href="#Terracina">Terracina</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Aones, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_113">113</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Aous">Aous, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἀπειρῶται, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apelles, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_210">210</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apennini montes, ii. <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_18">18</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apidanos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἀπόκλητοι, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_140">140</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apollo, temple of, at Gryneon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_216">216</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apollonia in Africa, ii. <a href="#Page_330">330</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apollonia on the Aous, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apollonia in Thrace, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_226">226</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apollonius Rhodius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_201">201</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_271">271</a> <i>n.</i>, ii. <a href="#Page_328">328</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apollonius, tyrant of Cassandrea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_88">88</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Appian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_304">304</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_292">292</a>, <a href="#Page_336">336</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apricots, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apuleius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_172">172</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_338">338</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apuli Daunii, ii. <a href="#Page_170">170</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apuli Lucani, ii. <a href="#Page_170">170</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apuli Teani, ii. <a href="#Page_170">170</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apulia et Calabria, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apulia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_154">154</a>, + <a href="#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="#Page_168">168</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Apulus, ii. <a href="#Page_168">168</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aqua Appia, ii. <a href="#Page_87">87</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aqua Claudia, ii. <a href="#Page_88">88</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aqua crabra, ii. <a href="#Page_50">50</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aqua damnata, ii. <a href="#Page_50">50</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aqua Marcia, ii. <a href="#Page_88">88</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aqua Virgo, ii. <a href="#Page_88">88</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aquae Sextiae, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aquileia, ii. <a href="#Page_248">248</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aquinum, ii. <a href="#Page_127">127</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aquitani, ii. <a href="#Page_313">313</a>, <a href="#Page_317">317</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aquitania, ii. <a href="#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arabic language, ii. <a href="#Page_205">205</a>, <a href="#Page_206">206</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arachthos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_256">256</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arae Philaenorum, ii. <a href="#Page_330">330</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aragonese language, ii. <a href="#Page_299">299</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Araethyrea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_53">53</a>; comp. <a href="#Phlius">Phlius</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Arar, ii. <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aratores, ii. <a href="#Page_272">272</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aratus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_53">53</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arausio, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arcades, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_75">75</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arcadia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_70">70</a> foll.</li> + +<li class="indx">Archaeanactidae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_246">246</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Archelaus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Archilochus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_186">186</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Archytas, ii. <a href="#Page_186">186</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arctinus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_208">208</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ardea, ii. <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ardyaei, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_300">300</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_306">306</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_311">311</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arelas, Arelate, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aremorica, ii. <a href="#Page_318">318</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arena, ii. <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_92">92</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Areopagus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_96">96</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aretinus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_261">261</a> <i>n.</i> 2</li> + +<li class="indx">Areus, Areas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_262">262</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Arevaci, ii. <a href="#Page_299">299</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἀργεῖοι, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_26">26</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Argentum Oscense, ii. <a href="#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Argolis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_37">37</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Argos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_37">37</a> foll., <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Argos Amphilochicum, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_166">166</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_263">263</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_266">266</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_270">270</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἄργος Ἵππιον, see <a href="#Arpi">Arpi</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Argos in Orestis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_166">166</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_269">269</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Argos in Thessaly, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_278">278</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Argyripa, see <a href="#Arpi">Arpi</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Argyrocastro, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_268">268</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aricia, ii. <a href="#Page_115">115</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arimaspae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_208">208</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ariminum, ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_164">164</a> <i>n.</i>, <a href="#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arisba, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_218">218</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aristides, Aelius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_293">293</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Aristodemus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_56">56</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aristodemus, tyrant of Elis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_88">88</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aristophanes, ii. <a href="#Page_8">8</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aristoteles, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_16">16</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_200">200</a>, <a href="#Page_296">296</a> <i>n.</i>, <a href="#Page_331">331</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aristoxenus, ii. <a href="#Page_205">205</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arles, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Armorica, ii. <a href="#Page_25">25</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arnauts, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_301">301</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arndt, E. M., ii. <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arne, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_113">113</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arno, ii. <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_215">215</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Arpi">Arpi, ii. <a href="#Page_170">170</a>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arpinum, ii. <a href="#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arretium, ii. <a href="#Page_163">163</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arretium, vases of, ii. <a href="#Page_134">134</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arretium, vetus, fidens, Julium, ii. <a href="#Page_227">227</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arrian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_118">118</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arsinoe, ii. <a href="#Page_329">329</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Artemidorus, ii. <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Artyni, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_43">43</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aruaci, ii. <a href="#Page_299">299</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arverni, ii. <a href="#Page_312">312</a>, <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Arx, ii. <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Asbestus, ii. <a href="#Page_44">44</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Asclepiadae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_204">204</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Asculum, ii. <a href="#Page_151">151</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Asia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_22">22</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Asine, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Asinia gens, ii. <a href="#Page_157">157</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Asopus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_116">116</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aspetus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_261">261</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Asphalt, springs of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_305">305</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aspropotamo, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_145">145</a>; comp. <a href="#Achelous">Achelous</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Assisium, ii. <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Assos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_218">218</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Astacos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_354">[354]</span>Asteria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Astorga, ii. <a href="#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Astures, ii. <a href="#Page_301">301</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Asturica, ii. <a href="#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἄστυ, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_93">93</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Astypalaea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_195">195</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Asylum, ii. <a href="#Page_66">66</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Atarneus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_223">223</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Atella, ii. <a href="#Page_127">127</a>, <a href="#Page_132">132</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Athamania, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_280">280</a> <i>n.</i> 2</li> + +<li class="indx">Athenae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_93">93</a> foll.;</li> + <li class="isub1">the city of Hadrian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_99">99</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">acropolis of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_97">97</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">buildings, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_100">100</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_106">106</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">population, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_107">107</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">allied with Aetolia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_143">143</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἀθηνᾶ Πολιάς, temple of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_97">97</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Athenaeus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_108">108</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_205">205</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἀθηναῖοι Βοιωτοί, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_112">112</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἀθηναῖος, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_91">91</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Athenians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_98">98</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_194">194</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Athesis, ii. <a href="#Page_246">246</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Athos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_226">226</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_229">229</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_280">280</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Atintanes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_269">269</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_311">311</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Atreids, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_33">33</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Atrium, ii. <a href="#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Atrium Libertatis, ii. <a href="#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Atrium Vestae, ii. <a href="#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Attica, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_90">90</a> foll.</li> + +<li class="indx">Atticus, T. Pomponius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_267">267</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_272">272</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἀττικός, Ἀττική, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_91">91</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Attius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_181">181</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Audyeelah, ii. <a href="#Page_335">335</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aufidus, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Augila, ii. <a href="#Page_335">335</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Augusta Taurinorum, ii. <a href="#Page_252">252</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Augusta Trevirorum, ii. <a href="#Page_319">319</a></li> + +<li class="indx">S. Augustin, ii. <a href="#Page_87">87</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Augustodunum, ii. <a href="#Page_317">317</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Augustus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_308">308</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_137">137</a> + <i>n.</i>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>, <a href="#Page_295">295</a>, <a href="#Page_296">296</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aula Domitiani, ii. <a href="#Page_97">97</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aulaea, ii. <a href="#Page_97">97</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aurelia, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aurelianus, ii. <a href="#Page_58">58</a></li> + +<li class="indx">M. Aurelius, emperor, ii. <a href="#Page_140">140</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aurunci, ii. <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ausonia, ii. <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ausonius, ii. <a href="#Page_242">242</a>, <a href="#Page_303">303</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Αὐταγγελτοί, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_130">130</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Autariatae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_309">309</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Aventinus, ii. <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Avernus Lacus, ii. <a href="#Page_139">139</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Avignon, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Avineo, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Avitus, ii. <a href="#Page_311">311</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Axius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_282">282</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Azan, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_71">71</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Azanes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_71">71</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Bacanae, lake, ii. <a href="#Page_214">214</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bacchus, worship of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_233">233</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_289">289</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bacchylides, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Badajoz, ii. <a href="#Page_296">296</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Baetica, ii. <a href="#Page_282">282</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Baetis, ii. <a href="#Page_281">281</a>, <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Baiae, ii. <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_138">138</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Balari, ii. <a href="#Page_274">274</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Balnea, balneae, ii. <a href="#Page_94">94</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Βάλτος, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_256">256</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Barbarians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_26">26</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_8">8</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Barbaricini, ii. <a href="#Page_276">276</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Barbié du Bocage, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_118">118</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_257">257</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_289">289</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Barca, ii. <a href="#Page_329">329</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Barcelona, ii. <a href="#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Barcino, ii. <a href="#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bardylis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_300">300</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bari, ii. <a href="#Page_175">175</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Barium, ii. <a href="#Page_175">175</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Basilicata, ii. <a href="#Page_182">182</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Basilica of Antoninus, ii. <a href="#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Basilica Julia, s. L. et C. Caesarum, ii. <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Basilica Opimia, ii. <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Basilica Paulli, ii. <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Basilica Porcia, ii. <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Basilicae, ii. <a href="#Page_79">79</a></li> + +<li class="indx">S. Basilius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_106">106</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Basque, ii. <a href="#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Basque language, ii. <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_285">285</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Basra, ii. <a href="#Page_198">198</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Basse_Bretagne">Basse-Bretagne, ii. <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bastarnae, ii. <a href="#Page_325">325</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bastuli, ii. <a href="#Page_288">288</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Beaujour, Felix de, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Beef, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_31">31</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Beia, ii. <a href="#Page_296">296</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Belemina, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Belgae, ii. <a href="#Page_306">306</a>, <a href="#Page_319">319</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Belgium, ii. <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_304">304</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Belisarius, ii. <a href="#Page_44">44</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Βῆμα at Athens, ii. <a href="#Page_74">74</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Benacus, ii. <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Beneventum, ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="#Page_164">164</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bentley, Richard, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_253">253</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_196">196</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Berenice in Epirus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_268">268</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Cyrenaica, ii. <a href="#Page_329">329</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bergamum, ii. <a href="#Page_244">244</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Berne, ii. <a href="#Page_245">245</a></li> + +<li class="indx">St. Bernard, mount, ii. <a href="#Page_17">17</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Beroea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Berones, ii. <a href="#Page_299">299</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Berosus, ii. <a href="#Page_349">349</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Beterrae, ii. <a href="#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Beziers, ii. <a href="#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bianchini, ii. <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bias, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_209">209</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bituriges, ii. <a href="#Page_303">303</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Boccaccio, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_107">107</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_355">[355]</span>Bochart, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_22">22</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_268">268</a>, <a href="#Page_279">279</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Boebeis, lake, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Boeotarchs, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_115">115</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Boeotians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_113">113</a> foll., <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Boëthius, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Boii, ii. <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="#Page_236">236</a>, <a href="#Page_323">323</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Boion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_134">134</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Boissard, ii. <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bolgs, ii. <a href="#Page_306">306</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bomii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_138">138</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Βωμὸς Ἐλέους, Αἰδοῦς at Athens, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_98">98</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Βωμὸς of Fama and Ὁρμή, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bonaparte, Lucien, ii. <a href="#Page_110">110</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bononia, ii. <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Boreas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_17">17</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Borghese, Prince, ii. <a href="#Page_114">114</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Borgo">Borgo, ii. <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bory de St. Vincent, ii. <a href="#Page_294">294</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Borysthenis, Borysthenopolis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_243">243</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bosporus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_236">236</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bosporus, kingdom of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_245">245</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bottiaci, Bottiacis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_288">288</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bottii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_226">226</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_277">277</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Botzen, ii. <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Boundaries, natural, ii. <a href="#Page_273">273</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bovianum, ii. <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_163">163</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Βουλευτήριον at Athens, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_98">98</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Βουλή, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_130">130</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bozra, ii. <a href="#Page_337">337</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Brancaleone, ii. <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Brenin, ii. <a href="#Page_306">306</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Brennus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_134">134</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Brescia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_170">170</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Breuni, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_299">299</a></li> + +<li class="indx">—<i>bria</i>, Thracian suffix for Town, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_237">237</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Brienne, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_107">107</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Brilessus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Britain, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_20">20</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Britany, see <a href="#Basse_Bretagne">Basse Bretagne</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Britons, ii. <a href="#Page_207">207</a>, <a href="#Page_281">281</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Brittia, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Brixia, ii. <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_244">244</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Brocchi, ii. <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bröndstedt, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bronzes, ii. <a href="#Page_173">173</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Brundusium, ii. <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_179">179</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bruttii, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bruttium, ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_144">144</a>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bryseae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Buffaloes, ii. <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bullii, Bulliones, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_301">301</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_306">306</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bulwark of Pope Paul III., ii. <a href="#Page_60">60</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bura, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Burdigala, ii. <a href="#Page_303">303</a>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Burgus, see <a href="#Borgo">Borgo</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Burial places of the poor at Rome, ii. <a href="#Page_46">46</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Buschetti, ii. <a href="#Page_218">218</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bushmen, ii. <a href="#Page_340">340</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Bustum of the Caesars, ii. <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Butadae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_86">86</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Buthroton, Buthrotos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_259">259</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_267">267</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_271">271</a> foll.</li> + +<li class="indx">Buxentum, ii. <a href="#Page_204">204</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Βύρσα, ii. <a href="#Page_337">337</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Byzacene, Byzacitis, Byzacium, ii. <a href="#Page_332">332</a>, <a href="#Page_338">338</a>, <a href="#Page_339">339</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Byzantium">Byzantium, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_237">237</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Byzantius, Byzantinus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_238">238</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Cabral, ii. <a href="#Page_112">112</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caelius, hill, ii. <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caelius Antipater, ii. <a href="#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caere, ii. <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_223">223</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caesar, C. Julius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_306">306</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_241">241</a>, <a href="#Page_303">303</a>, <a href="#Page_306">306</a>, <a href="#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caesaraugusta, ii. <a href="#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Calabri, ii. <a href="#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Calabria (Terra di Lecce), <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_255">255</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Calauria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_44">44</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cales, ii. <a href="#Page_128">128</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caligula, ii. <a href="#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="#Page_136">136</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Callaici, ii. <a href="#Page_301">301</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Callimachus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_144">144</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_202">202</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_269">269</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_271">271</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Callipolis">Callipolis on the Hellespont, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_236">236</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Callipolis in Magna Graecia, ii. <a href="#Page_185">185</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Calor, ii. <a href="#Page_161">161</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Calvinists, ii. <a href="#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Calydon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_136">136</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_145">145</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Camalodunum, ii. <a href="#Page_322">322</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Camarina, ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cambunii montes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_157">157</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cameos, ii. <a href="#Page_199">199</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Camerinum, ii. <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Camiros, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_196">196</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Campagna di Roma, ii. <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Campagna_di_Lavoro">Campagna di Lavoro, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Campania, ii. <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Campania Aurelia, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Campania Romana (Romae), ii. <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Campania suburbicaria, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Campanian vases, ii. <a href="#Page_133">133</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Campi, ii. <a href="#Page_128">128</a>, <a href="#Page_130">130</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Campi Catalaunici, ii. <a href="#Page_128">128</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Campo Santo, ii. <a href="#Page_218">218</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Campo Vaccino, ii. <a href="#Page_73">73</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Campus Caelimontanus, ii. <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Campus Esquilinus, ii. <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Campus_Martius">Campus Martius, ii. <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Καμπυλίδαι, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Camuni, ii. <a href="#Page_244">244</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Candauian hills, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_285">285</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Canobus, ii. <a href="#Page_344">344</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Canosa, ii. <a href="#Page_174">174</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cantabri, ii. <a href="#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Canusium, ii. <a href="#Page_170">170</a>, <a href="#Page_173">173</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_356">[356]</span>Capena, ii. <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_225">225</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Capharean rocks, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_178">178</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Capitoline temple, ii. <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Capitolinus, ii. <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Capua, ii. <a href="#Page_127">127</a>, <a href="#Page_130">130</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caralis, ii. <a href="#Page_276">276</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Κάρβανοι, ii. <a href="#Page_8">8</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Carcer, ii. <a href="#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cardamyle, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cardia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_235">235</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cardinals, ii. <a href="#Page_45">45</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cares, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_192">192</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_203">203</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_205">205</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_217">217</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Carinae, ii. <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Carpathos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_195">195</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Carpetani, Καρπήσιοι, ii. <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Carthaea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_141">141</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Carthago, ii. <a href="#Page_330">330</a>, <a href="#Page_336">336</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Carthago nova, ii. <a href="#Page_288">288</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Carystus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Casci, Cascus, ii. <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Casilinum, ii. <a href="#Page_127">127</a>, <a href="#Page_129">129</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Casinum, ii. <a href="#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Casmenae, ii. <a href="#Page_264">264</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cassander, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_296">296</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_297">297</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cassandrea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_298">298</a>; comp. <a href="#Potidaea">Potidaea</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Cassianus, ii. <a href="#Page_311">311</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cassiopea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_263">263</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_272">272</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cassiterides insulae, ii. <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Castalia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_129">129</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Castanea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_158">158</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Castaneae nuces, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_158">158</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Castiglione, ii. <a href="#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Castulonensis saltus, ii. <a href="#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Catacombs, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_106">106</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_46">46</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Catalani, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_107">107</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Catalogue, see <a href="#Homer">Homer</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Catana, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Κατάπλους, ii. <a href="#Page_136">136</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cato, M. Porcius, ii. <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cattle, breeding of, ii. <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Catullus, ii. <a href="#Page_245">245</a>, <a href="#Page_246">246</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caucones, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caudium, ii. <a href="#Page_165">165</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caudini, ii. <a href="#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caulon, Caulonia, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caunii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_201">201</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Καυσία, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_292">292</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Caystrus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_210">210</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Celano, ii. <a href="#Page_156">156</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Celia, ii. <a href="#Page_68">68</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Celia, Della, ii. <a href="#Page_329">329</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Celtae, ii. <a href="#Page_280">280</a>, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>, <a href="#Page_298">298</a>, <a href="#Page_306">306</a>, <a href="#Page_326">326</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Celtiberi, ii. <a href="#Page_280">280</a>, <a href="#Page_300">300</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Celtici, ii. <a href="#Page_280">280</a>, <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Celtic language, ii. <a href="#Page_305">305</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Celtoligyes, ii. <a href="#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cenchreae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_51">51</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cencius Camerarius, ii. <a href="#Page_97">97</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Cenomani, ii. <a href="#Page_236">236</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Census at Rome, ii. <a href="#Page_72">72</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Centaurs, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Centrones, ii. <a href="#Page_50">50</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Centumcellae">Centumcellae, ii. <a href="#Page_136">136</a>, <a href="#Page_223">223</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Centuripa, ii. <a href="#Page_271">271</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ceos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cephaloedion, ii. <a href="#Page_267">267</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Cephallenia">Cephallenia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_153">153</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cephallenian islands, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_153">153</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cephisus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">the Phocian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_117">117</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ceramicus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_97">97</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ceras (χρυσοῦν), <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_237">237</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ceraunian mountains, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_255">255</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cerigo, see <a href="#Cythera">Cythera</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Cermalus, ii. <a href="#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cerynea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ceylon, ii. <a href="#Page_274">274</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chaeronea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chalcedon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_238">238</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_242">242</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Χαλκιδῆς ἐπὶ Θρᾴκης, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_282">282</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chalcidice, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_227">227</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chalcidian towns, in Epithrace, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Sicily and Italy, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chalcis, in Acarnania, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Euboea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_134">134</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_179">179</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_207">207</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_273">273</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Syria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_291">291</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">alleged town in Thrace, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_227">227</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chalk, ii. <a href="#Page_39">39</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Χάλκος, ii. <a href="#Page_321">321</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Champagne, ii. <a href="#Page_128">128</a>, <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Champollion, the younger, ii. <a href="#Page_210">210</a>, <a href="#Page_342">342</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chaones; comp. <a href="#Chones">Chones</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Χειμάῤῥους, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_144">144</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chemi, ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cherson, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_245">245</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chersonesus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_42">42</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chersonesus, town, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_245">245</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chersonesus Taurica, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_245">245</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chersonesus Thracica, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chios, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_205">205</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_206">206</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_213">213</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chittim, ii. <a href="#Page_349">349</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Chone, ii. <a href="#Page_11">11</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Chones">Chones in Italy, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_260">260</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_181">181</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Christian religion at Athens and Rome, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_106">106</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Church S. Catarina de’ funari, ii. <a href="#Page_89">89</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Church S. Cosma e Damiano, ii. <a href="#Page_76">76</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Church S. Maria Liberatrice, ii. <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Church S. Maria Maggiore, ii. <a href="#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Church S. Salvatoris in maximis, ii. <a href="#Page_68">68</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cicero, <i>in Clodium et Curionem</i>, ii. <a href="#Page_138">138</a>, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1"><i>pro Cluentio</i>, ii. <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1"><i>pro Scauro</i>, ii. <a href="#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1"><i>pro Tullio</i>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_195">195</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cilicia, ii. <a href="#Page_284">284</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cilicians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_185">185</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_357">[357]</span>Κιλλικύριοι, ii. <a href="#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cimariotae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cimbri, ii. <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="#Page_312">312</a>, <a href="#Page_326">326</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ciminian forest, ii. <a href="#Page_225">225</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cimmerii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_221">221</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Κιμώνειον τεῖχος, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_97">97</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cimon, peace of, ii. <a href="#Page_348">348</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cios, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cipollino, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_178">178</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Circaeum, ii. <a href="#Page_39">39</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Circus Agonalis, ii. <a href="#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Circus of Alexander Severus, ii. <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Circus Flaminius, ii. <a href="#Page_89">89</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Circus Maximus, ii. <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Circus of Nero, ii. <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cirrha, see <a href="#Crissa">Crissa</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Cirta, ii. <a href="#Page_339">339</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cispius Mons, ii. <a href="#Page_43">43</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cithaeron, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_116">116</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Citium, ii. <a href="#Page_349">349</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Civita Castellana, ii. <a href="#Page_230">230</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Civita Vecchia, ii. <a href="#Page_223">223</a>; comp. <a href="#Centumcellae">Centumcellae</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Civitas added to names of towns, ii. <a href="#Page_112">112</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Civitates, ii. <a href="#Page_312">312</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Classes, ii. <a href="#Page_239">239</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Clay, works in, ii. <a href="#Page_227">227</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Clazomenae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_206">206</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_212">212</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Claudian">Claudianus Mamertus, ii. <a href="#Page_311">311</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Clemens of Alexandria, ii. <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cleobulus of Lindos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_201">201</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cleomenes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_66">66</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cleomenes, architect of Alexandria, ii. <a href="#Page_345">345</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cleonae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_41">41</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cleruchia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_181">181</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Clientes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_43">43</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Clientela, ii. <a href="#Page_308">308</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Clisthenes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_86">86</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Clivus, ii. <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_66">66</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cloacae, ii. <a href="#Page_47">47</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Clovis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_262">262</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Clusium, ii. <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cluver, Philip, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_6">6</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cnidus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_204">204</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Cnosus">Cnosus, Cnossus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_192">192</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_193">193</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Coae vestes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_190">190</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Coals, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_78">78</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Codex Theodosianus, ii. <a href="#Page_27">27</a>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Coins, ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_163">163</a>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="#Page_193">193</a>, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="#Page_205">205</a>, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>, <a href="#Page_265">265</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>, <a href="#Page_284">284</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Colchis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_248">248</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Collis, i.e. Quirinalis, ii. <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Collis Hortulorum, see <a href="#Hortulorum">Hortulorum</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Cologne, ii. <a href="#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Colonia Agrippina, ii. <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Colonia Augusta Rauracorum, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Colonia Maritima, ii. <a href="#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Coloniae Civiles, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Colonies, Greek in Italy and Sicily, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_177">177</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Asia Minor, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_205">205</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Macedonia and Thrace, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_224">224</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Latin, ii. <a href="#Page_31">31</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Roman, ii. <a href="#Page_125">125</a>, <a href="#Page_205">205</a>, <a href="#Page_290">290</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Colonna, cape, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_110">110</a>; comp. <a href="#Sunion">Sunion</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Colophon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_206">206</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_212">212</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Colophonian colony in Magna Graecia, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Κόλπος μέλας, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_234">234</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Colosseum, ii. <a href="#Page_92">92</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Columna Trajani, ii. <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Κωμηδόν, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Comitium, ii. <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Commune, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_150">150</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">C. Latium, ii. <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Comparative Ethnography, ii. <a href="#Page_6">6</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Compsa, ii. <a href="#Page_166">166</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Comum, ii. <a href="#Page_241">241</a>, <a href="#Page_244">244</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Conipodes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_43">43</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Connubium, ii. <a href="#Page_289">289</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Consentia, ii. <a href="#Page_184">184</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Constantina, ii. <a href="#Page_339">339</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Constantinople, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_238">238</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_241">241</a>; comp. <a href="#Byzantium">Byzantium</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Constantine Porphyrogenitus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_245">245</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Constantine, emperor, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_264">264</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Conventus Civium Romanorum, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Copae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Copais, lake, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_114">114</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_117">117</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Copts, ii. <a href="#Page_342">342</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corals, banks of, ii. <a href="#Page_274">274</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Coral fishing, ii. <a href="#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corax, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_186">186</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cordonata, ii. <a href="#Page_65">65</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cordos, see <a href="#Corinth">Corinth</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Corduba, ii. <a href="#Page_290">290</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cordubenses poetae, ii. <a href="#Page_290">290</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corcyra, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_272">272</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corcyra, town, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_275">275</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corcyra melaena, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Corfinium">Corfinium, ii. <a href="#Page_157">157</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corfu, ii. <a href="#Page_178">178</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corinna, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_118">118</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Corinth">Corinth, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_134">134</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_207">207</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corinthian Gulf, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_81">81</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Coriolanus, ii. <a href="#Page_51">51</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corn, ii. <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corn trade, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_243">243</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corneto, ii. <a href="#Page_222">222</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corniculum, ii. <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corone, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Coronelli, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_8">8</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corphi, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_274">274</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Corsica, ii. <a href="#Page_203">203</a>, <a href="#Page_278">278</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cortona, ii. <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_204">204</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cosetani, ii. <a href="#Page_294">294</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cosenza, ii. <a href="#Page_184">184</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_358">[358]</span>Κόσμοι, the, of the Cretans, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_194">194</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cosmo, III. de Medici, ii. <a href="#Page_215">215</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cossa, Cossa Volcentium, ii. <a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_221">221</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cothon, ii. <a href="#Page_337">337</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cranae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_112">112</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cranai, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Κρατήρ, ii. <a href="#Page_140">140</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Craterus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_49">49</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cremona, ii. <a href="#Page_238">238</a>, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>, <a href="#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Crenidas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_285">285</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Creophilus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_209">209</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cresphontes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_57">57</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Κρησφύγετον, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Crestonaea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_287">287</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Crete, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_141">141</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_190">190</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Κρητίζειν, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_195">195</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Crissa">Crissa, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_127">127</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Crissaean Gulf, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_116">116</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cromna, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_250">250</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cronium Mare, ii. <a href="#Page_305">305</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Crossaea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_287">287</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_289">289</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Croton, Crotona, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_152">152</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Crotona, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_262">262</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Crumentum, ii. <a href="#Page_184">184</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Crypta, ii. <a href="#Page_139">139</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ctesicles, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_108">108</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cumae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>, <a href="#Page_151">151</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cuneus, ii. <a href="#Page_92">92</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cures, ii. <a href="#Page_147">147</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Curetes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_137">137</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Curia Hostilia, ii. <a href="#Page_75">75</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Curia Julia, ii. <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Curia Vecchia, ii. <a href="#Page_95">95</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Curius Dentatus, ii. <a href="#Page_147">147</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Curzola, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyclades, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_114">114</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_183">183</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyclopes, ii. <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyclopean works, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_154">154</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_260">260</a>; + ii. <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="#Page_156">156</a>, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Κύκλος, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_93">93</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cydon, Cydonii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_192">192</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cydonia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_194">194</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyllene, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_78">78</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyme Phriconis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_216">216</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cymri, ii. <a href="#Page_306">306</a>, <a href="#Page_312">312</a>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>, <a href="#Page_321">321</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cynaetha, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_75">75</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cynosarges, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cynurii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_41">41</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyparissia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_83">83</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyprus, ii. <a href="#Page_348">348</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyrenaica, ii. <a href="#Page_327">327</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyrene, ii. <a href="#Page_192">192</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyrillian alphabet, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyrillus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Κύρνος, ii. <a href="#Page_278">278</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyrrhus in Syria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Cythera">Cythera, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_114">114</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_182">182</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cythnos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cytinium, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_134">134</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cytoros, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_250">250</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Cyzicus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_207">207</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_241">241</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_123">123</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Dalmatia and Dalmatians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_312">312</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Δαναοί, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_25">25</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dardani, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_284">284</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_304">304</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dardanus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Daunia, ii. <a href="#Page_4">4</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Daunii, ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Decelea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_111">111</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Decius, emperor, ii. <a href="#Page_57">57</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Delium, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Delos">Delos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Delphi">Delphi, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_129">129</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_261">261</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_223">223</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Delta of rivers, ii. <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Demetrias, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_166">166</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_167">167</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_235">235</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Demetrius Phalereus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_165">165</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Demetrius of Pharos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Demetrius Poliorcetes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_167">167</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_198">198</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Demi of Attica, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_110">110</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Democritus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Demosthenes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_227">227</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_236">236</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_246">246</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dessaretae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_301">301</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_309">309</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Diaconiae of the Christians at Rome, ii. <a href="#Page_45">45</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dialect, the Laconian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_136">136</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Latin dialects, ii. <a href="#Page_34">34</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Diana, at Ephesus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_210">210</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">at Rome, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Dicaearchia">Dicaearchia, ii. <a href="#Page_135">135</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dicaearchus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_121">121</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_224">224</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Δίγλωσσοι, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_227">227</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_267">267</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_178">178</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dignitaries, secular, ii. <a href="#Page_45">45</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dimalon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_301">301</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Diocletian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dion Cassius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_297">297</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dion Chrysostomus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_242">242</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Diodorus of Sicily, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_310">310</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>, <a href="#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>, <a href="#Page_259">259</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>, <a href="#Page_263">263</a>, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>, <a href="#Page_289">289</a>, <a href="#Page_336">336</a>, <a href="#Page_341">341</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Diomedes, his kingdom, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Diomedes, ii. <a href="#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_289">289</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dionigi, Madame, ii. <a href="#Page_118">118</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dionysius I., ii. <a href="#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dionysius II., ii. <a href="#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dionysius of Halicarnassus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_94">94</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dionysius Periegeta, ii. <a href="#Page_200">200</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dionysius Thrax, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_175">175</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dioscuria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_248">248</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dodona, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_254">254</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dodwell, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_158">158</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dolonces, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_234">234</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dolopes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a> <i>n.</i>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_280">280</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dolopian mountains, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_157">157</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_359">[359]</span>Domitian, ii. <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Aula Domitiani, ii. <a href="#Page_97">97</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Statua equestris, ii. <a href="#Page_71">71</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Donati, ii. <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Doria, river, ii. <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dorians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_192">192</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_196">196</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_203">203</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Doris, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_134">134</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dositheus magister, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_175">175</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Drachmae">Drachmae and tetradrachmae of Athens, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_104">104</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Drepana, ii. <a href="#Page_268">268</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Drepane, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_272">272</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Drino, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_284">284</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_312">312</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Druids, ii. <a href="#Page_308">308</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dryopes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_41">41</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Messenia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dulichium, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_146">146</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dureau de la Malle, ii. <a href="#Page_66">66</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Durius, ii. <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Durocortorum, Durocortoro, ii. <a href="#Page_310">310</a>, <a href="#Page_319">319</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Durra, ii. <a href="#Page_330">330</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dwarf palm, ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dyme, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Δυναστής, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_219">219</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Dyrrachium, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_308">308</a>; comp. <a href="#Epidamnus">Epidamnus</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Earth, notions of the ancients of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_15">15</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">earliest division of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_22">22</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in a burning state, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ecetrae, ii. <a href="#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Echinades, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_148">148</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Edessa, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Edetani, ii. <a href="#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Edones, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_288">288</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Egesta, ii. <a href="#Page_269">269</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Egribos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_180">180</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eichhorn, K. F., ii. <a href="#Page_119">119</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Εἴδωλον, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_97">97</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Einsiedeln, itinerary of, ii. <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_232">232</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eionae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_42">42</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἐκκλησία, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_130">130</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Elatea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_132">132</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Elea">Elea in Oenotria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_212">212</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>; comp. <a href="#Velia">Velia</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Eleus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_234">234</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eleusis (Eleusina), <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_109">109</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eleutherae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_112">112</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eleutherolacones, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Elimiotae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_278">278</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_282">282</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Elis">Elis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">κοίλη, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_59">59</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">town, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_78">78</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Emathia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Emerita Augusta, ii. <a href="#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Emporiae, ii. <a href="#Page_294">294</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Empti venditi, ii. <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Encheleans, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_299">299</a></li> + +<li class="indx">England, ii. <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>, <a href="#Page_281">281</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἐνιῆνες, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_172">172</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Enna, ii. <a href="#Page_271">271</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἐννέα ὁδοί, see <a href="#Amphipolis">Amphipolis</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Ennius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_158">158</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Epaminondas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_118">118</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Epeans, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ephesus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_210">210</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ephorus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_153">153</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ephyra, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_44">44</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Epidamnus">Epidamnus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_308">308</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Epidaurus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_42">42</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">temple of Aesculapius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_44">44</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Epidaurus_Limera">Epidaurus Limera, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Epipolae, ii. <a href="#Page_258">258</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Epirus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_251">251</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Epirotae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_125">125</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_275">275</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eratosthenes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_81">81</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_188">188</a>, <a href="#Page_304">304</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Erchomenos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_122">122</a>, see <a href="#Orchomenos">Orchomenos</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Erechtheum, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_97">97</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eretria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_277">277</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eridanus, ii. <a href="#Page_20">20</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Erineos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_134">134</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Erymanthus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Erythea, ii. <a href="#Page_287">287</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Erythrae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_120">120</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_206">206</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Eryx">Eryx, ii. <a href="#Page_257">257</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Esquiliae, ii. <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Esquiline, ii. <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eteobutadae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_87">87</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eteocretes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_191">191</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_192">192</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἔθνος, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_132">132</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Etruria, ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_206">206</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Etrusci, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_191">191</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Etruscan walls, ii. <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">columns, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">language, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_209">209</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">writing, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Euboea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_175">175</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Euboean sea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_116">116</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eudyeelah, ii. <a href="#Page_335">335</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eudoxus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_19">19</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Euenus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_137">137</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_145">145</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Euganei, ii. <a href="#Page_247">247</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eugubinian Tables, ii. <a href="#Page_210">210</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eumenes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_235">235</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eunuchs, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_211">211</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Euripides, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_119">119</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Euripus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_178">178</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Europe, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_23">23</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Eurotas">Eurotas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_60">60</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eurypontids, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_56">56</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eurysthenes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_56">56</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eurytanes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_138">138</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Eusebius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_166">166</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_349">349</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Fabius Maximus, ii. <a href="#Page_39">39</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fabius Pictor, ii. <a href="#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="#Page_170">170</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fabrataria, ii. <a href="#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="#Page_126">126</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fabretti, ii. <a href="#Page_50">50</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Faesulae, ii. <a href="#Page_163">163</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Falera, ii. <a href="#Page_230">230</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_360">[360]</span>Falernian wine, ii. <a href="#Page_128">128</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Falernus ager, ii. <a href="#Page_127">127</a>, <a href="#Page_132">132</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Falisci, ii. <a href="#Page_229">229</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fanum, ii. <a href="#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fasti Capitolini, ii. <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_110">110</a>, <a href="#Page_226">226</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fasti of the Venetian consuls, ii. <a href="#Page_248">248</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fasti of Verrius Flaccus, ii. <a href="#Page_111">111</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fasti Triumphales, ii. <a href="#Page_116">116</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Faun, the Barberini, ii. <a href="#Page_102">102</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fauriel, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_258">258</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fauvel, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_96">96</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Faventia, ii. <a href="#Page_237">237</a>, <a href="#Page_239">239</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Favissa, ii. <a href="#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fea, ii. <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fellatah, ii. <a href="#Page_340">340</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Felsina, ii. <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ferentinum, ii. <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="#Page_118">118</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Festus, ii. <a href="#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Feudalism, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_37">37</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ficoroni, ii. <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Firbolgs, ii. <a href="#Page_306">306</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fire, the, of Nero, ii. <a href="#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Firn, ii. <a href="#Page_117">117</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Flaminia, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Flamininus, T. Quinctius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Florentia, ii. <a href="#Page_163">163</a>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="#Page_237">237</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Florentines, ii. <a href="#Page_16">16</a>, <a href="#Page_206">206</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Florus, ii. <a href="#Page_56">56</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fora, ii. <a href="#Page_237">237</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Formiae, ii. <a href="#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="#Page_139">139</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fornix Fabianus, ii. <a href="#Page_98">98</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum, meaning of, ii. <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Augusti, ii. <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Aurelium, ii. <a href="#Page_85">85</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Boarium, ii. <a href="#Page_85">85</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Caesaris, ii. <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Cornelii, ii. <a href="#Page_239">239</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Domitiani, ii. <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Julii, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Nervae, ii. <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Olitorium, ii. <a href="#Page_85">85</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Palladium, ii. <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Popillii, ii. <a href="#Page_239">239</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Romanum, s. Maximum, ii. <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Forum Trajani, s. Ulpium, ii. <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fossa Cluilia, ii. <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fossa Quiritium, ii. <a href="#Page_51">51</a></li> + +<li class="indx">France, population of, ii. <a href="#Page_145">145</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Franks, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_306">306</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_145">145</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Frascati, ii. <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fratres populi Romani, ii. <a href="#Page_317">317</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fregellae, ii. <a href="#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fregenae, ii. <a href="#Page_223">223</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fréjus, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Frentani, ii. <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="#Page_158">158</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Frisians, ii. <a href="#Page_251">251</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Frontinus, ii. <a href="#Page_56">56</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fronto, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_293">293</a> <i>n.</i>; ii. <a href="#Page_310">310</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Frusino, ii. <a href="#Page_116">116</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fucinus, lake, ii. <a href="#Page_156">156</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fulginium, ii. <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fulvius, Andreas, ii. <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_137">137</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Funchal, ii. <a href="#Page_60">60</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Fundi, ii. <a href="#Page_124">124</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Gabii, ii. <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_113">113</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gades, ii. <a href="#Page_287">287</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gael, ii. <a href="#Page_306">306</a>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gaetuli, ii. <a href="#Page_333">333</a>, <a href="#Page_335">335</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Γαλάται, ii. <a href="#Page_306">306</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Galatia, ii. <a href="#Page_325">325</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Galli, ii. <a href="#Page_306">306</a>, <a href="#Page_321">321</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gallia, ii. <a href="#Page_303">303</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Gallia_Cisalpina">Gallia Cisalpina, ii. <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_232">232</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gallia Cispadana, ii. <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_236">236</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gallia Lugdunensis, ii. <a href="#Page_311">311</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gallia Narbonensis, ii. <a href="#Page_311">311</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gallia Togata, see <a href="#Gallia_Cisalpina">Gallia Cisalpina</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Gallia Transpadana, ii. <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_236">236</a>, <a href="#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gallipoli, ii. <a href="#Page_185">185</a>; comp. <a href="#Callipolis">Callipolis</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Γάμοροι, ii. <a href="#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gamucci, ii. <a href="#Page_82">82</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Garamantes, ii. <a href="#Page_335">335</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gardens, see <a href="#Horti">Horti</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Garganus, ii. <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Garigliano, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Garve, ii. <a href="#Page_168">168</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gatterer, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_276">276</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gela, ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_264">264</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gell, Sir William, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Genauni, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_299">299</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Geneva, ii. <a href="#Page_125">125</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Genua, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_43">43</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_251">251</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Geranean mountains, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_29">29</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Germa, ii. <a href="#Page_335">335</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Germani, ii. <a href="#Page_306">306</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Germania prima, ii. <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Germania secunda, ii. <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gesner, J. M., ii. <a href="#Page_84">84</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Getae, ii. <a href="#Page_324">324</a>, <a href="#Page_326">326</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Γετῶν ἐρημία, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_243">243</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gigantes, ii. <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Glagolitian alphabet, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_303">303</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Glass, ii. <a href="#Page_335">335</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gnosus, Gnossus, see <a href="#Cnosus">Cnosus</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Goethe, ii. <a href="#Page_53">53</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gold mines, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_285">285</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_295">295</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_283">283</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in rivers, ii. <a href="#Page_283">283</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">gold sand, ii. <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gomphi, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_156">156</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gonfalina, ii. <a href="#Page_215">215</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gortyn, Gortyna, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_193">193</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gothofredus, Jac., ii. <a href="#Page_29">29</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Goths, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_106">106</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_311">311</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gracchus, C., ii. <a href="#Page_75">75</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Graeculi, ii. <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Γραικοί, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_25">25</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gras, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_217">217</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Greece">Greece, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_24">24</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_361">[361]</span>Greeks, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_49">49</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Greek language in Southern Italy and Sicily, ii. <a href="#Page_144">144</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gregory the Great, ii. <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_137">137</a>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>, <a href="#Page_276">276</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gregory of Tours, ii. <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_317">317</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gronovius, J. F., <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_238">238</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Grotta Ferrata, ii. <a href="#Page_50">50</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gryneon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_216">216</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gubbio, ii. <a href="#Page_210">210</a>, <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Guilletière, de la, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_8">8</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Guiscard, Robert, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_50">50</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Gytheion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_61">61</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Hadria, ii. <a href="#Page_153">153</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hadrian, emperor, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_105">105</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hadrian I., pope, ii. <a href="#Page_93">93</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hadrumetum, ii. <a href="#Page_332">332</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Haedui, see <a href="#Aedui">Aedui</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Haemonia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_159">159</a>; comp. <a href="#Aemonia">Aemonia</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Haemus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_284">284</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Halesa, ii. <a href="#Page_270">270</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Haliae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_44">44</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Ἁλιῆς, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_44">44</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Haliacmon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Haliartus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_121">121</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Haliartus, lake of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_117">117</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Halicarnassus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_203">203</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Haller of Nürnberg, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Halonnesus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_181">181</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Halys, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_249">249</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hamilcar Barcas, ii. <a href="#Page_257">257</a>, <a href="#Page_289">289</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hannibal, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_265">265</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="#Page_289">289</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Harpocration, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_163">163</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hausmann, ii. <a href="#Page_133">133</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hebrus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hecataeus of Miletus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hecatonnesus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_215">215</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_217">217</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἕδος, ii. <a href="#Page_68">68</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Εἵλωτες, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Helice, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_81">81</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Helicon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_128">128</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hellanicus, Phoronis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hellas, see <a href="#Greece">Greece</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Ἑλλὰς συνεχής, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_24">24</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἕλληνες, Ἕλλοι, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_25">25</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hellenistic dialect, ii. <a href="#Page_280">280</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hellespont, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_182">182</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Helos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Helvetii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_311">311</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heneti, ii. <a href="#Page_247">247</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Henna, ii. <a href="#Page_270">270</a>, <a href="#Page_271">271</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hephaestia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_181">181</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heraclea in Bithynia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_245">245</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heraclea in Chersonesus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_245">245</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heraclea in Magna Graecia, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heraclea on the Liburnian coast, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_312">312</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heraclea ἐν Μαριανδύνοις, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_250">250</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heraclea in Sicily, ii. <a href="#Page_264">264</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heraclea ἡ ἐπὶ Τραχῖνι, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_171">171</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heracleia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_114">114</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heracleids, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heraclitus, the philosopher, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_210">210</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heraea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_143">143</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heraean hills, ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heraeon in Samos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_210">210</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hercules, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_114">114</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hermione, Hermion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_43">43</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hernae, ii. <a href="#Page_117">117</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hernici, ii. <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_116">116</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Herodes Atticus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_105">105</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Herodotus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_18">18</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_107">107</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_120">120</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_135">135</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_299">299</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_211">211</a>, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>, <a href="#Page_343">343</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hesiod, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_216">216</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hesperia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_22">22</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hestiaea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_178">178</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hestiaeotis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Heyne, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_127">127</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_196">196</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hiera, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_190">190</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hierapytna, ii. <a href="#Page_35">35</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hierian islands, ii. <a href="#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hiero II., ii. <a href="#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hieronymus of Cardia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_235">235</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Highlanders of Scotland, ii. <a href="#Page_306">306</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hills of Rome, ii. <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Himera, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_266">266</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Himerius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_106">106</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hindoo, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_156">156</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hippo, ii. <a href="#Page_332">332</a>, <a href="#Page_338">338</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hippodamus of Miletus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hipponax, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_210">210</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hipponium, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_203">203</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hirpini, ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_165">165</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hirpus, ii. <a href="#Page_230">230</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hirt, A., ii. <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hispalis, ii. <a href="#Page_290">290</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hispalli, ii. <a href="#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hispania, ii. <a href="#Page_279">279</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hispania citerior, ii. <a href="#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hispania Tarraconensis, ii. <a href="#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hispania ulterior, ii. <a href="#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hispellum, ii. <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Holstenius, Lucas, ii. <a href="#Page_230">230</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Homer">Homer, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_111">111</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_120">120</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_148">148</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_196">196</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_224">224</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Hymn on Apollo, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_253">253</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">comp. <a href="#Iliad">Iliad</a>, <a href="#Odyssey">Odyssey</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Homeridae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_213">213</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Honey, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Honorius, ii. <a href="#Page_58">58</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Horatii and Curiatii, ii. <a href="#Page_51">51</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Horace, ii. <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>, <a href="#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="#Page_231">231</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Horti">Horti, ii. <a href="#Page_53">53</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Horti Aemilii, ii. <a href="#Page_54">54</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Horti Sallustiani, ii. <a href="#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Hortulorum">Hortulorum mons s. collis, ii. <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_57">57</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_362">[362]</span>Hottentots, ii. <a href="#Page_340">340</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Huesca, ii. <a href="#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Humbert, ii. <a href="#Page_336">336</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Humboldt, Wil. von, ii. <a href="#Page_279">279</a>, <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hume, ii. <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_129">129</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Huns, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_311">311</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hyantes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_113">113</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hycsos, ii. <a href="#Page_342">342</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hydrea, Hydra, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_54">54</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hydruntum, ii. <a href="#Page_179">179</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hyes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_113">113</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hyginus, Julius, ii. <a href="#Page_117">117</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hyle, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_120">120</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hylice, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_117">117</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hylli, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_269">269</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_299">299</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hymettus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_91">91</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hypate, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_172">172</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hyperboreans, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_17">17</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Hyperides, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_82">82</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ὑποθῆβαι, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_119">119</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Ialysos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_196">196</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Janiculus, ii. <a href="#Page_44">44</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Jansenists, ii. <a href="#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Janus dexter, sinister, ii. <a href="#Page_61">61</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Iapydes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_299">299</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ἰαπυγία ἀκτή, ii. <a href="#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Iapygian promontory, ii. <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Iapyx, ii. <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Jason of Pherae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_164">164</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Iberia, ii. <a href="#Page_279">279</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Iberians, ii. <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>, <a href="#Page_312">312</a>, <a href="#Page_322">322</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Iberus, ii. <a href="#Page_279">279</a>, <a href="#Page_282">282</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ida, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_193">193</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Idubeda, ii. <a href="#Page_299">299</a></li> + +<li class="indx">J. Jerome, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Jerusalem, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_17">17</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Jesuits, ii. <a href="#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Iguvinian tables, ii. <a href="#Page_210">210</a>, <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Jinghis Khan, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_310">310</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Iguvium, ii. <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ilerda, ii. <a href="#Page_294">294</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ilergetes, ii. <a href="#Page_294">294</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Iliad">Iliad, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_214">214</a>; comp. <a href="#Homer">Homer</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Ilion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_218">218</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ilisus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Illyrians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_297">297</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_311">311</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_324">324</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Illyrian language, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Illyrian mountains, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_304">304</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Illyricum, Ἰλλυρίς, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_267">267</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_297">297</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ilva, ii. <a href="#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Imbros, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_181">181</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Inachus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Inferum mare, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Inscription of Protogenes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_244">244</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Inscriptions, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_270">270</a> <i>n.</i>; ii. <a href="#Page_110">110</a>, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>, <a href="#Page_284">284</a>, <a href="#Page_285">285</a>, <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Insubres, ii. <a href="#Page_236">236</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Interamna">Interamna, ii. <a href="#Page_147">147</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Interamnium, ii. <a href="#Page_126">126</a></li> + +<li class="indx">S. John, Evangelist, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_211">211</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Iolcos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_167">167</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_168">168</a>,</li> + <li class="isub1">gulf of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ionia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_205">205</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ionians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_84">84</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ionian colonies in Magna Graecia, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ios, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Josephus, ii. <a href="#Page_337">337</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ireland, ii. <a href="#Page_321">321</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Iron, ii. <a href="#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ischia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Iscipio, ii. <a href="#Page_279">279</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Isis of Elephantine, ii. <a href="#Page_341">341</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Isopolity, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_138">138</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_140">140</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ispahan, ii. <a href="#Page_198">198</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Issa, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_312">312</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Isthmus of Corinth, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_45">45</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Istria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_304">304</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_249">249</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Itali, ii. <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_179">179</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Italians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_43">43</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_37">37</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Italica, see <a href="#Corfinium">Corfinium</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Italica in Spain, ii. <a href="#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Italici, ii. <a href="#Page_6">6</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Italiots, ii. <a href="#Page_181">181</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Italus, ii. <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, <a href="#Page_3">3</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Italy, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_101">101</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_129">129</a>, <a href="#Page_256">256</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ithaca, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_153">153</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ithome, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_68">68</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">temple of Zeus Ithomatas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_68">68</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ithopya, ii. <a href="#Page_340">340</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Itinerary of Einsiedlen, ii. <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Judges, books of, ii. <a href="#Page_337">337</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Iulis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Jus Latii, ii. <a href="#Page_32">32</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Jus Municipii, ii. <a href="#Page_32">32</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Justin, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_263">263</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_309">309</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Juthungi, ii. <a href="#Page_57">57</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Juturna, well of, ii. <a href="#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Juvenal, ii. <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Koosh, ii. <a href="#Page_341">341</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Kopitar, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Labeatis, lake, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_312">312</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Laborde, Alex., ii. <a href="#Page_294">294</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Labyrinth, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_194">194</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lacedaemon, κοίλη, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lacetani, ii. <a href="#Page_294">294</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lacini, ii. <a href="#Page_33">33</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lacinium, ii. <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lacinus, ii. <a href="#Page_34">34</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Laconia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_56">56</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lacus Curtius, ii. <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lacus Servilius, ii. <a href="#Page_75">75</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lakes, with subterraneous outlets, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_29">29</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_363">[363]</span>Lampsacus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx">La’ncisa, ii. <a href="#Page_215">215</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Languages, affinities of, ii. <a href="#Page_305">305</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">roots of, ii. <a href="#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Languedoc, ii. <a href="#Page_145">145</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lanuvina, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_237">237</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lanuvium, ii. <a href="#Page_113">113</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lanzi, ii. <a href="#Page_209">209</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Laocoon, group of, ii. <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Laos">Laos, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_192">192</a>, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>; comp. <a href="#Laus">Laus</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Lapathos, ii. <a href="#Page_349">349</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lapithae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Laplace, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_46">46</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Larissa, arx of Argos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_40">40</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Larissa, in Thessaly, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_167">167</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Las, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_58">58</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lateran, ii. <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Latin dialects, ii. <a href="#Page_34">34</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Latin grammar, ii. <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Latin language, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_261">261</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_25">25</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Λατίνη, ii. <a href="#Page_30">30</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Latins, ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Latin confederacy, ii. <a href="#Page_31">31</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Latin colonies, ii. <a href="#Page_31">31</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Latinitas, ii. <a href="#Page_33">33</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Latinum nomen, ii. <a href="#Page_31">31</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Latinus, ii. <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Λάτιον, ii. <a href="#Page_30">30</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Latium, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_115">115</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Laurentum, ii. <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Laurion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_91">91</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Laus">Laus, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a>; comp. <a href="#Laos">Laos</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx" id="Laus_Pompeii">Laus Pompeii, ii. <a href="#Page_244">244</a>; comp. <a href="#Lodi">Lodi</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Lavici, ii. <a href="#Page_34">34</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lavini, ii. <a href="#Page_33">33</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lavinium, ii. <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Lebadea">Lebadea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_122">122</a>; comp. <a href="#Livadia">Livadia</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Lebedos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_211">211</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lechaeon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_51">51</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Legio, ii. <a href="#Page_297">297</a>; comp. <a href="#Leon">Leon</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Leleges, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_26">26</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lembi, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_300">300</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lemnos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_181">181</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_207">207</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leo IV., ii. <a href="#Page_58">58</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leon, the Salaminian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_111">111</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Leon">Leon, in Spain, ii. <a href="#Page_171">171</a>, <a href="#Page_297">297</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leon, Isla de, ii. <a href="#Page_287">287</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leonessa, ii. <a href="#Page_19">19</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leontini, ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leontion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leopold II., ii. <a href="#Page_215">215</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leopolis, ii. <a href="#Page_223">223</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lepanto, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_124">124</a> <i>n.</i>; comp. <a href="#Naupactus">Naupactus</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Lepreon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_79">79</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leptis, ii. <a href="#Page_332">332</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Λεπτόγεως, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lerida, ii. <a href="#Page_294">294</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lesbos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_217">217</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lessing, ii. <a href="#Page_39">39</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leucaethiopes, ii. <a href="#Page_340">340</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leucas, Leucate, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_148">148</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_149">149</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_152">152</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leuctra, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_121">121</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Levant, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lex Aelia Sentia, ii. <a href="#Page_33">33</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lex de Gallia Cisalpina, ii. <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lex Julia, ii. <a href="#Page_32">32</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lex Junia Norbana, ii. <a href="#Page_33">33</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Leyden, ii. <a href="#Page_198">198</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Libanius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_106">106</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Libethrides, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_288">288</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Libri pontificii, ii. <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Liburnians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_272">272</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_299">299</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_304">304</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_246">246</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Liburnicae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_300">300</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Libyans, ii. <a href="#Page_274">274</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Libye, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_22">22</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Λιβύες, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Λιβυφοίνικες, ii. <a href="#Page_274">274</a>, <a href="#Page_333">333</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Libyan Alphabet, ii. <a href="#Page_284">284</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Licentia poetica, ii. <a href="#Page_231">231</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Light-house in Pharos, ii. <a href="#Page_346">346</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ligorio, Pirro, ii. <a href="#Page_76">76</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ligures, ii. <a href="#Page_16">16</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_312">312</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Liguria, ii. <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_27">27</a>, <a href="#Page_249">249</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lilybaeum, ii. <a href="#Page_268">268</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lime, ii. <a href="#Page_39">39</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Limestone mountains, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_305">305</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Limes, ii. <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Limnae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_61">61</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lindos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_196">196</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Linen, ii. <a href="#Page_292">292</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lingones, ii. <a href="#Page_236">236</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Linternum, ii. <a href="#Page_127">127</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lipsius, ii. <a href="#Page_73">73</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Liris, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_128">128</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lissus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_312">312</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Livadia">Livadia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_117">117</a>; comp. <a href="#Lebadea">Lebadea</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Livonia, ii. <a href="#Page_37">37</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Livy, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_264">264</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_281">281</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_296">296</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>, <a href="#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Locati conducti, ii. <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Locri Narycii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_125">125</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_200">200</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Locri Epicnemidii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_123">123</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Locri Epizephyrii, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_200">200</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Locri Opuntii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_123">123</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Locri Ozoli, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_200">200</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Locrian colonies in Magna Graecia, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Lodi">Lodi, ii. <a href="#Page_244">244</a>; comp. <a href="#Laus_Pompeii">Laus Pompeii</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">London, ii. <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_322">322</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Longobardi (Lombards), ii. <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a></li> + +<li class="indx">S. Lorenzo, ii. <a href="#Page_278">278</a></li> + +<li class="indx">De Luc, ii. <a href="#Page_18">18</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Luca, ii. <a href="#Page_216">216</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lucan, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_313">313</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_241">241</a>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lucani, ii. <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="#Page_170">170</a>, <a href="#Page_180">180</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lucania et Brittia, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lucania, ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Luceria, ii. <a href="#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="#Page_174">174</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_364">[364]</span>Lucerum, ii. <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lucian, ii. <a href="#Page_136">136</a>, <a href="#Page_346">346</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lucretius, ii. <a href="#Page_246">246</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lucumo, ii. <a href="#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lucus Capenas, ii. <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ludi Magni Romani, ii. <a href="#Page_88">88</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ludi plebeii, ii. <a href="#Page_88">88</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ludias, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_292">292</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lugdunum, ii. <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Luna, ii. <a href="#Page_216">216</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lungara, ii. <a href="#Page_58">58</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lusitani, ii. <a href="#Page_297">297</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lycaeus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lyceum at Athens, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lychnidas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_309">309</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lycians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_192">192</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lyctus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_192">192</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_194">194</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lycurgus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_128">128</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_191">191</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lydians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_206">206</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_217">217</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lyncestians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_278">278</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_282">282</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lyons, ii. <a href="#Page_295">295</a>, <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lysander, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Lysimachia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_234">234</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Macar, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_218">218</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Macedonia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_275">275</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Macellum, ii. <a href="#Page_85">85</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mac Gregor, clan of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_266">266</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Μάχαιρα, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_301">301</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Machiavelli, ii. <a href="#Page_228">228</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Macra, ii. <a href="#Page_24">24</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Macrii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_175">175</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Macris, i.e. Corcyra, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_272">272</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Maeander, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_206">206</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Maecenas, his palace, ii. <a href="#Page_54">54</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Maenalii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_71">71</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Maenalus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Magal, ii. <a href="#Page_337">337</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Magister vici, pagi, ii. <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Magna Graecia, ii. <a href="#Page_188">188</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Magnesia in Asia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_168">168</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Magnesia on the Maeander, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Magnesia near mount Sipylus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_221">221</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Magnesia in Thessaly, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_165">165</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_166">166</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Magnetes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_277">277</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mahomed, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_107">107</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_234">234</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Malacca, ii. <a href="#Page_288">288</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Malea">Malea, cape, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_60">60</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Μαλιακὸς κόλπος, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_171">171</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Malii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_171">171</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_252">252</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Maltese language, ii. <a href="#Page_338">338</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Maluentum, ii. <a href="#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="#Page_164">164</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mamertini, ii. <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_265">265</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mamertus, see <a href="#Claudian">Claudian</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Manduria, ii. <a href="#Page_179">179</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Manii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mannert, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_10">10</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Mantinea">Mantinea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_73">73</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">lake of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_39">39</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mantua, ii. <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_245">245</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Maps of Ptolemy, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_5">5</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">the most ancient Latin, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_5">5</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Greek, Arabic, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_5">5</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">of the Greeks, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_17">17</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Marathon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_110">110</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Marble, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_186">186</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_267">267</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mare inferum, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mare superum, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mare Tuscum, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mare Tyrrhenicum, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Maremma, ii. <a href="#Page_214">214</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mareotis, ii. <a href="#Page_342">342</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mariana, ii. <a href="#Page_279">279</a></li> + +<li class="indx">S. Marino, ii. <a href="#Page_114">114</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Marinus of Tyre, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_21">21</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Marliani, Bartholom., ii. <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Marmarica, ii. <a href="#Page_336">336</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Marmor Parium, ii. <a href="#Page_267">267</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Maronea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Marrana, ii. <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Marrucini, ii. <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="#Page_153">153</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Marruvium, ii. <a href="#Page_156">156</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Marshes, Pontine, ii. <a href="#Page_138">138</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Marsi, ii. <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Martial, ii. <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Martius, Campus; comp. <a href="#Campus_Martius">Campus Martius</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Massaesyli, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Massalia">Massalia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_212">212</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Massic wine, ii. <a href="#Page_128">128</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Massilia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_212">212</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_314">314</a>; comp. <a href="#Massalia">Massalia</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Massyli, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mastrucae, ii. <a href="#Page_276">276</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Μάσυες, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Matapan, cape, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Matrona, ii. <a href="#Page_318">318</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Μαυροί, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mausoleum Augusti, ii. <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mausoleum of Hadrian, ii. <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Μάξυες, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mazirgh, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mazzocchi, ii. <a href="#Page_209">209</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mecklenburg, ii. <a href="#Page_208">208</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mecone, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_52">52</a>; comp. <a href="#Sicyon">Sicyon</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Meddix Tutix, ii. <a href="#Page_171">171</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Medici, Princes of, ii. <a href="#Page_215">215</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Mediolanum">Mediolanum, ii. <a href="#Page_242">242</a>; comp. <a href="#Milan">Milan</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Mediterranean Sea, tides in the, ii. <a href="#Page_331">331</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Medma, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Megalopolis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_169">169</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Megara, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_237">237</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Megara, suburb of Carthage, ii. <a href="#Page_337">337</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Megaris, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_87">87</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Mela">Mela, Pomponius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_11">11</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Melanogaetuli, ii. <a href="#Page_333">333</a>, <a href="#Page_335">335</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Melcarth, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_182">182</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Meleager, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_137">137</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_365">[365]</span>Melesigenes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_214">214</a>; comp. <a href="#Homer">Homer</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Meletios of Janina, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_122">122</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_257">257</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Melii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_171">171</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Melite, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Melos">Melos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Melpum ii. <a href="#Page_234">234</a>; comp. <a href="#Milan">Milan</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Melville, general, ii. <a href="#Page_18">18</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Membliarus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_190">190</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Memnon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_198">198</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Memphis, ii. <a href="#Page_344">344</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Menapii, ii. <a href="#Page_319">319</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mende, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_228">228</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Menelaus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_60">60</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Meones, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_205">205</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_207">207</a>, <a href="#Page_211">211</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Meonia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_168">168</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Merida, ii. <a href="#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Meroe, ii. <a href="#Page_341">341</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mesembria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_242">242</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Messana, ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>; comp. <a href="#Zancle">Zancle</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Messapia, ii. <a href="#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Messe, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Messene, Messenia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_125">125</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">the town of Epaminondas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_68">68</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Messenian wars, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_65">65</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Metapontum, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_193">193</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Metathesis, ii. <a href="#Page_112">112</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Methodius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Methone_in_Messenia">Methone in Messenia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Methone in Pieria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_289">289</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Methymna, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Metrodorus of Scepsis, ii. <a href="#Page_226">226</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mexicans, ii. <a href="#Page_208">208</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mexico, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_191">191</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Migrations of nations, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_310">310</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Milan">Milan, ii. <a href="#Page_241">241</a>; comp. <a href="#Mediolanum">Mediolanum</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Milanese, ii. <a href="#Page_242">242</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Miletus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_206">206</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_248">248</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Millot, ii. <a href="#Page_275">275</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Milo, see <a href="#Melos">Melos</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Mimas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_215">215</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mimnermus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_212">212</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Minius, ii. <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Minos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_190">190</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_191">191</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Minturnae, ii. <a href="#Page_132">132</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Minutius Felix, ii. <a href="#Page_106">106</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Minyes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_114">114</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_190">190</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Thessalian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mirus, ii. <a href="#Page_242">242</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Misitra, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_61">61</a>; comp. <a href="#Sparta">Sparta</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Missolunghi, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_145">145</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Mitylene">Mitylene, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_219">219</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Μιξέλληνες, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_226">226</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_242">242</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mnaseas, ii. <a href="#Page_180">180</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Modern Greek, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_261">261</a> <i>n.</i>;</li> + <li class="isub1">pronunciation, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_124">124</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Modon, see <a href="#Methone_in_Messenia">Methone in Messenia</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Moenia, ii. <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_262">262</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Moles Hadriani, ii. <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Molochath, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Molotti, Molossi, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_259">259</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_261">261</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_268">268</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Molottian dogs, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_258">258</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Molottian kings, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_263">263</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Monembasia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_62">62</a>; see <a href="#Epidaurus_Limera">Epidaurus Limera</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx" id="Mons_Albanus">Mons Albanus, ii. <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mons Testaceus, ii. <a href="#Page_137">137</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Monte Cavo, ii. <a href="#Page_38">38</a>; see <a href="#Mons_Albanus">Mons Albanus</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Monte S. Giuliano, ii. <a href="#Page_257">257</a>; comp. <a href="#Eryx">Eryx</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Monte Testaccio, ii. <a href="#Page_137">137</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Monti Latini, ii. <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Monumentum Ancyranum, ii. <a href="#Page_72">72</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mopsopia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_85">85</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Morea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Morelli, ii. <a href="#Page_70">70</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Morgetes, ii. <a href="#Page_181">181</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Moriah, hill, ii. <a href="#Page_48">48</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Morosini, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_8">8</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Moscow, ii. <a href="#Page_344">344</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Motye, ii. <a href="#Page_267">267</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mucianus, ii. <a href="#Page_40">40</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Müller, Johannes, ii. <a href="#Page_326">326</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Müller, C. O., <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_276">276</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mulucha, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mummies, ii. <a href="#Page_342">342</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Munda, ii. <a href="#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Munychia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Murcia, ii. <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Murus Servii regis, ii. <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Murviedro, ii. <a href="#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Muscles, development of, ii. <a href="#Page_16">16</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Museum in Athens, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Musimon, ii. <a href="#Page_273">273</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mutina, ii. <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mycale, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_209">209</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mycalessus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mycenae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_114">114</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Myconos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mygdonia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_288">288</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_294">294</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mylae, ii. <a href="#Page_267">267</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mylitta, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_182">182</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Myriandros, ii. <a href="#Page_350">350</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Myrina, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_181">181</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Myron, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_210">210</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mysi, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_205">205</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mytilene, see <a href="#Mitylene">Mitylene</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Myus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_208">208</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Mzirgh, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Nabis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Naphtha, springs of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Naples, population of the kingdom, ii. <a href="#Page_252">252</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Naples, city, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Napoli di Malvasia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nar, ii. <a href="#Page_21">21</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Narbo, Narbo Martius, Narbona, ii. <a href="#Page_313">313</a>, <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_366">[366]</span>Nardini, ii. <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Narnia, ii. <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Naryx, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_125">125</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_200">200</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nasamones, ii. <a href="#Page_335">335</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nasos, ii. <a href="#Page_258">258</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Naucratis, ii. <a href="#Page_347">347</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Naumachia, ii. <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Naupactus">Naupactus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_125">125</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_142">142</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nauplia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_41">41</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Navale, ii. <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Navarino, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_70">70</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Naxos, island, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_188">188</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Naxos in Sicily, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_264">264</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Neapolis, part of Syracuse, ii. <a href="#Page_258">258</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Necropolis of Alexandria, ii. <a href="#Page_53">53</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Negroponte, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_180">180</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nelids, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_33">33</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nemausus, ii. <a href="#Page_313">313</a>, <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nemi lake, ii. <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_115">115</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Νεώσοικοι, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_101">101</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_105">105</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nepet, ii. <a href="#Page_225">225</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nequinum, ii. <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Neri, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_107">107</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nero, ii. <a href="#Page_96">96</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">his golden house, ii. <a href="#Page_97">97</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">his palace, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_97">97</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Neriton, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_151">151</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nersae, ii. <a href="#Page_120">120</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nesis, ii. <a href="#Page_135">135</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nesti, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nestor, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Netherlands, ii. <a href="#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nestos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_281">281</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_282">282</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a></li> + +<li class="indx">New York, ii. <a href="#Page_192">192</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nibby, ii. <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nicaea, ii. <a href="#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nicander, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_223">223</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nicopolis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_152">152</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nicolo Pisano, ii. <a href="#Page_218">218</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Niebuhr, B. G., <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_303">303</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Niger, ii. <a href="#Page_335">335</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nigritae, ii. <a href="#Page_335">335</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nile, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_23">23</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_343">343</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nisaea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_87">87</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nisita, ii. <a href="#Page_135">135</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nismes, ii. <a href="#Page_313">313</a>, <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nisyros, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_195">195</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nizza, ii. <a href="#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nola, ii. <a href="#Page_132">132</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Νομάδες, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nomen Latinum, Fabium, etc., ii. <a href="#Page_32">32</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nomentum, ii. <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Νόμος, ὁ κοινὸς τῶν Ἑλλήνων, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_131">131</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nonius, ii. <a href="#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nora, ii. <a href="#Page_276">276</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Noraces, ii. <a href="#Page_274">274</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Noricum, ii. <a href="#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">North wind, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_16">16</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Notion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_212">212</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Notitia imperii, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Notus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_17">17</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Novocomum, ii. <a href="#Page_244">244</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nuceria, ii. <a href="#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Numantia, ii. <a href="#Page_300">300</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Numbers, Greek, signs of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_163">163</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Numidae, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Numidia, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nursia, ii. <a href="#Page_120">120</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Nymphaeum, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Obelisk, ii. <a href="#Page_89">89</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Obotritae, ii. <a href="#Page_251">251</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Odessus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_243">243</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Odyssey">Odyssey, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_192">192</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_253">253</a>; comp. <a href="#Homer">Homer</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Odysseus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_148">148</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oeneus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_137">137</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oeniadae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_138">138</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_149">149</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_150">150</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oenoe, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_111">111</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oenotria, ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_179">179</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oenotrians, ii. <a href="#Page_180">180</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oeta, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_128">128</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_157">157</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oetaei, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_172">172</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ofanto, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ogygia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Olbia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_243">243</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">inscription of, ii. <a href="#Page_304">304</a>, <a href="#Page_325">325</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Olenus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_81">81</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Olisipo, ii. <a href="#Page_297">297</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Olives, in Peloponnesus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_31">31</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Argolis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_40">40</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Corinth, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_51">51</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Sicyon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_131">131</a> <i>n.</i>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Italy, ii. <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Africa, ii. <a href="#Page_339">339</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Olympia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_79">79</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Olympian games, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_128">128</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Olympieum, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_97">97</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Olympus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_157">157</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_287">287</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Olynthus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_227">227</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ὀμβρικοί, ii. <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Onean mountains, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_29">29</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Onomarchus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_132">132</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Opica, ii. <a href="#Page_6">6</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Opici">Opicans, ii. <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Opican language, ii. <a href="#Page_5">5</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Opici mures, ii. <a href="#Page_7">7</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oppius mons, ii. <a href="#Page_43">43</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Opus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_125">125</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oranges, ii. <a href="#Page_315">315</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Orbelos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Orchomenos in Arcadia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_74">74</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Orchomenos">Orchomenos in Boeotia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_114">114</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ὀρείχαλκος, ii. <a href="#Page_321">321</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oreos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_178">178</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Orestis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_166">166</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_259">259</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_265">265</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_269">269</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_280">280</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oretani, ii. <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oricus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_268">268</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Orneae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_41">41</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oropo, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_113">113</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oropus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_112">112</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Orosius, ii. <a href="#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Orospeda, ii. <a href="#Page_282">282</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_367">[367]</span>Orpheus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_287">287</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Orthagoras, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_53">53</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ortygia, comp. <a href="#Delos">Delos</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ortygia in Sicily, ii. <a href="#Page_257">257</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Orviedo, ii. <a href="#Page_221">221</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Osca, ii. <a href="#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oscan language, ii. <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_168">168</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oscense argentum, ii. <a href="#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oscans, see <a href="#Opici">Opici</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Ossa, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_158">158</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ostia, ii. <a href="#Page_106">106</a>, <a href="#Page_136">136</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Othrys, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_156">156</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Otranto, ii. <a href="#Page_179">179</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ottilienberg, ii. <a href="#Page_235">235</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ovid, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_242">242</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_271">271</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Oxylus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_137">137</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Pace, Roman, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_46">46</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Padus, ii. <a href="#Page_20">20</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Paeones, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_287">287</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_288">288</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_297">297</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Paestum, ii. <a href="#Page_205">205</a>; comp. <a href="#Posidonia">Posidonia</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx" id="Pagae">Pagae, (Pegae), <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_88">88</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pagasae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_165">165</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_167">167</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pagasaean gulf, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_165">165</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pagus, ii. <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Painters, school of, at Sicyon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_52">52</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">at Bologna, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_52">ibid.</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Palace of Nero, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Palace of Titus, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Palaepolis, ii. <a href="#Page_140">140</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Palatinus, ii. <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Palazzuolo, ii. <a href="#Page_108">108</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pale, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pale-burghers, ii. <a href="#Page_119">119</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Palestrina, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_237">237</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_112">112</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pallene, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_226">226</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_280">280</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Palmerius, see <a href="#Paulmier">Paulmier</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Pamisus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_67">67</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pamphylia, ii. <a href="#Page_348">348</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Panaetolium, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_147">147</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Panaeton, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_111">111</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pandionids, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_85">85</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pangaeus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_284">284</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_285">285</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Panionium, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_215">215</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pannonii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_297">297</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Panormus, ii. <a href="#Page_268">268</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pantani, ii. <a href="#Page_47">47</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pantheon of Agrippa, ii. <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Panvini, ii. <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Parauaei, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_263">263</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_265">265</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_269">269</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Parian Chronicle, ii. <a href="#Page_267">267</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Parma, ii. <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Parnassus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_128">128</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_157">157</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Parnes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Paros, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_186">186</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Parrhasii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_71">71</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Parrhasius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_210">210</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Parthenii, ii. <a href="#Page_187">187</a>, <a href="#Page_201">201</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Parthenon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_98">98</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Parthenope, ii. <a href="#Page_139">139</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Parthini, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_300">300</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_306">306</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_311">311</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Passaro, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_263">263</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_267">267</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Passeri, ii. <a href="#Page_209">209</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Patavium">Patavium, ii. <a href="#Page_246">246</a>, <a href="#Page_247">247</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Patrae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_82">82</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Patres conscripti, ii. <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Patrimonium D. Petri, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Paul III., bulwark of, ii. <a href="#Page_60">60</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Paulmier">Paulmier de Grentemesnil, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_275">275</a></li> + +<li class="indx">St. Paul, Apostle, ii. <a href="#Page_136">136</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Paulus Diaconus, ii. <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pausanias, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_120">120</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pavia, see <a href="#Patavium">Patavium</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Pax Augusta, ii. <a href="#Page_296">296</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pax Julia, ii. <a href="#Page_296">296</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pedasos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pegae, see <a href="#Pagae">Pagae</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Pelagonii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_269">269</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pelasgi, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_192">192</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_204">204</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_220">220</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_227">227</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_253">253</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_287">287</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_299">299</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="#Page_207">207</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Πελασγικὸν τεῖχος, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_97">97</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pelasgiotis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pelasgian endings, —<i>entum</i> —<i>untum</i>, ii. <a href="#Page_109">109</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pelasgus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pelion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_158">158</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Peligni, ii. <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pella, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_229">229</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_282">282</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_289">289</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pellana, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pellene, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_82">82</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pelopidas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_118">118</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pelopidae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_217">217</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Peloponnesians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_135">135</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Peloponnesus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pelops, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_27">27</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_217">217</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pelorus, cape, ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Penelope, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Peneus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_158">158</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Penestae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_43">43</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Πενεστεία, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pentadactylon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pentelicus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_91">91</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pentrians, ii. <a href="#Page_161">161</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Peparethus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_181">181</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Peraebi, Peraebia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_166">166</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pergamus, kingdom of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_221">221</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pergamus, Pergamum, town, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_221">221</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_222">222</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pergamus, kings of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_55">55</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pergamus, school of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_222">222</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Periander, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_49">49</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Perinthos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_236">236</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Περίοδοι γῆς, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_12">12</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Περίπλοι, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_12">12</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Περίπλους περί Πόντον Εὔξεινον, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_248">248</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Perizonius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_7">7</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_368">[368]</span>Perrevos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_258">258</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Persius, ii. <a href="#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Peru, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_191">191</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Perusia, ii. <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Peruvians, ii. <a href="#Page_207">207</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Petelia, ii. <a href="#Page_184">184</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Peter the Great, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_294">294</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Petit-Radel, ii. <a href="#Page_156">156</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Petronius, ii. <a href="#Page_140">140</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Peucetii">Peucetii, ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_170">170</a>, <a href="#Page_175">175</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phaeaces, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_272">272</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phalantus, ii. <a href="#Page_186">186</a>, <a href="#Page_201">201</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phalerus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phanagoria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_246">246</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pharae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pharos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_312">312</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pharos, near Alexandria, ii. <a href="#Page_346">346</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pharsalus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_165">165</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_167">167</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phaselis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_203">203</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_347">347</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phasis, river, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_23">23</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phasis, town, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_248">248</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pheidon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_38">38</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pheneus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_75">75</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pherae in Laconia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pherae in Thessaly, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_167">167</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pherecydes, historian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_11">11</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pherecydes, philosopher, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phigalea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_143">143</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Philadelphia, ii. <a href="#Page_192">192</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Philaeni, altars of, ii. <a href="#Page_330">330</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Philetas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_271">271</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Philip of Macedonia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_280">280</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Philippi, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_285">285</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Philomelus (Philonomus?), <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_58">58</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phintias, ii. <a href="#Page_264">264</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phlegra, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_226">226</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phlegraean fields, ii. <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_128">128</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Phlius">Phlius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_53">53</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phocaea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_212">212</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phocians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_123">123</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phocis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_126">126</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phoenice on the Adriatic, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_267">267</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phoenicia, ii. <a href="#Page_350">350</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phoenician settlements in Africa, ii. <a href="#Page_332">332</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phoenicians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_114">114</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_332">332</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phrynichus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_208">208</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phthia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_162">162</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phthiotans, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phthiotis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_162">162</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phylarchus, ii. <a href="#Page_347">347</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phyle, fort in Attica, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_110">110</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Phylae in Attica, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_86">86</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Piazza Navona, ii. <a href="#Page_89">89</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Piceni, ii. <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_142">142</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Picentini, ii. <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Picenum, ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_150">150</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Picenus, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Picts, ii. <a href="#Page_321">321</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pictures, galleries of, ii. <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Piedmontese, ii. <a href="#Page_16">16</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pieria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_288">288</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pierides, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_288">288</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pietramala, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pimplea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_287">287</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pimpleides, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_288">288</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pincius mons, ii. <a href="#Page_43">43</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pindar, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_118">118</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_328">328</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pindus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_128">128</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_135">135</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_156">156</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_255">255</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Piraeeus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Piranesi, ii. <a href="#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pirates, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_300">300</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Pirene, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_51">51</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pisa in Elis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_79">79</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pisa in Etruria, ii. <a href="#Page_198">198</a>, <a href="#Page_217">217</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pisatis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pisaurum, ii. <a href="#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Piscivendulus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_238">238</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Pithecusae, ii. <a href="#Page_135">135</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Placentia, ii. <a href="#Page_237">237</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>, <a href="#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Plains in Attica, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Boeotia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_117">117</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Thessaly, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Plan of ancient Rome, ii. <a href="#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Plataeae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_112">112</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_115">115</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_120">120</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Platea, ii. <a href="#Page_87">87</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Plato, ii. <a href="#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Plautus, miles gloriosus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_52">52</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Πλήμμυρα, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_144">144</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pleuron, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_136">136</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_145">145</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pliny, the elder, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_278">278</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_304">304</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_309">309</a>; + ii. <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>, <a href="#Page_310">310</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pliny the younger, ii. <a href="#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_242">242</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Plutarch, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_118">118</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pnyx, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pococke, Richard, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_8">8</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Podium, ii. <a href="#Page_92">92</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Poediculi, see <a href="#Peucetii">Peucetii</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Poggio, ii. <a href="#Page_92">92</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pola, ii. <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Polar circles, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_19">19</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Polichna in Megaris, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_87">87</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Polichna in Crete, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_191">191</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Πολίχνιον, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_134">134</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Πόλις, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Πολιτεία, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_140">140</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pollentia, ii. <a href="#Page_237">237</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Polybius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_82">82</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_118">118</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_137">137</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_146">146</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_149">149</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_174">174</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_308">308</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_146">146</a>, <a href="#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="#Page_246">246</a>, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>, <a href="#Page_292">292</a>, <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Polycletus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_210">210</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pomoerium, ii. <a href="#Page_56">56</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pompeii, ii. <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_140">140</a>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pompey, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_82">82</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pomponius, see <a href="#Mela">Mela</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_369">[369]</span>Pomerania, ii. <a href="#Page_208">208</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pons Aelius, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pons Cestius, ii. <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pons Fabricius, ii. <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pons Milvius, ii. <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pons Palatinus, ii. <a href="#Page_104">104</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pons Senatorius, ii. <a href="#Page_105">105</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pons Sublicius, ii. <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pontine Marshes, ii. <a href="#Page_138">138</a></li> + +<li class="indx">C. Pontius, ii. <a href="#Page_146">146</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pontos Euxeinos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_207">207</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Population of Greece, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_121">121</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">of France ii. <a href="#Page_145">145</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Populonia">Populonia, ii. <a href="#Page_212">212</a>, <a href="#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Populus Romanus Quirites, ii. <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porphyry, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_60">60</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Aelia, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Appia, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Ardeatina, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Asinaria, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Aurelia, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Caelimontana, ii. <a href="#Page_60">60</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Capena, ii. <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Carmentalis, ii. <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Collina, ii. <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Esquilina, ii. <a href="#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Flaminia, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_89">89</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Flumentana, ii. <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Labicana, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Latina, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Metronia, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Mugonia, ii. <a href="#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Naevia, ii. <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Nigra at Treves, ii. <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Nomentana, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Ostiensis, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Pinciana, ii. <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Portuensis, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Praenestina, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Raudusculana, ii. <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Salara, ii. <a href="#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta S. Giovanni, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta S. Lorenzo, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta S. Pancratii, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta S. Pauli, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta S. Sebastiani, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Septimiana, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Tiburtina, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Trigemina, ii. <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porta Valeria, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porticus round the Forum, ii. <a href="#Page_78">78</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Porticus of Octavia, ii. <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Portolani del Mare, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_13">13</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Portus Romanus, ii. <a href="#Page_106">106</a>, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>, <a href="#Page_223">223</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ποσειδῶν Ἐνοσίχθων, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_81">81</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Posidonia">Posidonia, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_192">192</a>, <a href="#Page_205">205</a>, <a href="#Page_208">208</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Posidonius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_20">20</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_280">280</a>, <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Potidaea">Potidaea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_226">226</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_227">227</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_228">228</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pouqueville, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Praefectura Romana, ii. <a href="#Page_164">164</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Praeneste, ii. <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_111">111</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Praenestine dialect, ii. <a href="#Page_34">34</a>;</li> + <li class="isub2">Forum, <a href="#Page_111">111</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Praesos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_191">191</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Praetutii, ii. <a href="#Page_153">153</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Prasiae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Prasias, lake, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_296">296</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Praxiteles, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_121">121</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Prevesa, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_152">152</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Priene, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_209">209</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Prisci, ii. <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Prisci Latini, ii. <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Priscian, ii. <a href="#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Priscus, ii. <a href="#Page_35">35</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Privernum, ii. <a href="#Page_119">119</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Prochyta, ii. <a href="#Page_135">135</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Procles, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_56">56</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Procopius, ii. <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_27">27</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_243">243</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Προμαντεία, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_129">129</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Proni, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Propertius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_271">271</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Propontis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_207">207</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_237">237</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Πρόσχωσις, ii. <a href="#Page_39">39</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Πρωτεύοντες, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_245">245</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Provençal language, ii. <a href="#Page_310">310</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Provincia Romana (Gaul), ii. <a href="#Page_311">311</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Provincia suburbicaria, ii. <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Prumnis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_38">38</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Prytaneum at Athens, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_98">98</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pseudo-Philip, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Psophis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_143">143</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ptolemais, ii. <a href="#Page_330">330</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ptolemais (Egypt), ii. <a href="#Page_344">344</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ptolemy, geographer, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_21">21</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_340">340</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ptolemy Soter, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Puig, ii. <a href="#Page_93">93</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pulytion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Puplana, see <a href="#Populonia">Populonia</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Purple dyeing, ii. <a href="#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Puteoli, ii. <a href="#Page_136">136</a>; comp. <a href="#Dicaearchia">Dicaearchia</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Puy, ii. <a href="#Page_93">93</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Puycerda, ii. <a href="#Page_93">93</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pydna, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_289">289</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Πυλιακὸς κόλπος, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_171">171</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pylian kingdom, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_34">34</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pylos, the Messenian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pylos, the Triphylian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pyramid, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_46">46</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Pyrgi, ii. <a href="#Page_223">223</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pyrrhus of Epirus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_266">266</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pythagoras, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_209">209</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pythagorean writings, ii. <a href="#Page_184">184</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pythagoreans, ii. <a href="#Page_197">197</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pytheas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_19">19</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_321">321</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Pytho, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_128">128</a>; comp. <a href="#Delphi">Delphi</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Pyxus, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_204">204</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Quinarii, Illyrian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_309">309</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Quinctilian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_118">118</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_370">[370]</span>Quirinalis mons, ii. <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Quirium, ii. <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Raeti, ii. <a href="#Page_212">212</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Raetia prima, secunda, ii. <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ragusa, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_54">54</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_178">178</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Raphael Volterranus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_5">5</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rasena, ii. <a href="#Page_211">211</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ravenna, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="#Page_239">239</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ré, del, ii. <a href="#Page_112">112</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Reate, ii. <a href="#Page_150">150</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Regia, ii. <a href="#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Regio transpadana, ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Regiones Italiae of Augustus, ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Regiones of Severus, ii. <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Reguli, ii. <a href="#Page_285">285</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Reichardt, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_10">10</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Relegatio, ii. <a href="#Page_279">279</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Religion of Ceres and Proserpina, ii. <a href="#Page_271">271</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Remi, ii. <a href="#Page_319">319</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rennell, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_9">9</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rhacotis, ii. <a href="#Page_345">345</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rhamnus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_110">110</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rhegium, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_202">202</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rheims, ii. <a href="#Page_310">310</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rhenea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_185">185</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rhine, country of the, ii. <a href="#Page_145">145</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rhion, cape, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_124">124</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rhode, ii. <a href="#Page_294">294</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rhodope, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rhodes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_196">196</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_198">198</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_199">199</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rhodes, town, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_197">197</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rhypes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rimini, ii. <a href="#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Roche, Otto de la, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_106">106</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rogus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_271">271</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Roha, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rome, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_96">96</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_101">101</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_115">115</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_306">306</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_129">129</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>, <a href="#Page_267">267</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Roma, ii. <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Romance languages, ii. <a href="#Page_310">310</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Romania, ii. <a href="#Page_239">239</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rostra, ii. <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">vetera et nova, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_76">76</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rubicon, ii. <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rudiae, ii. <a href="#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Rusellae, ii. <a href="#Page_212">212</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Russian alphabet, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Sabellian tribes, ii. <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sabine language, ii. <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sabines, ii. <a href="#Page_149">149</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Saetabis, ii. <a href="#Page_292">292</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Safinim, ii. <a href="#Page_158">158</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sagra, ii. <a href="#Page_197">197</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Saguntum, ii. <a href="#Page_292">292</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sais, ii. <a href="#Page_344">344</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Salamanca, ii. <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Salamis, island, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_111">111</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_112">112</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Salamis, in Cyprus, ii. <a href="#Page_348">348</a>, <a href="#Page_349">349</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Salapia, ii. <a href="#Page_174">174</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Salassi, ii. <a href="#Page_249">249</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Salernum, ii. <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Salentini, ii. <a href="#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sallentum, ii. <a href="#Page_178">178</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sallust, ii. <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_333">333</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Salmantica, ii. <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Salmasius, ii. <a href="#Page_165">165</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Salona, Salonae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_303">303</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_313">313</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Salt, ii. <a href="#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Saltpetre, ii. <a href="#Page_176">176</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Same, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_153">153</a>;</li> +<li class="isub1">town, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_154">154</a>;</li> +<li class="isub1">comp. <a href="#Cephallenia">Cephallenia</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Samnites, ii. <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>, <a href="#Page_157">157</a>, <a href="#Page_162">162</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Samnium, ii. <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Samos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_204">204</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_209">209</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Samothrace, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_182">182</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_269">269</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Samuel, books of, ii. <a href="#Page_337">337</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Saone, ii. <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sappho, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_152">152</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_219">219</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Saragoza, ii. <a href="#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sardi montani, ii. <a href="#Page_274">274</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sardinia, ii. <a href="#Page_273">273</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sardinian language, ii. <a href="#Page_277">277</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Saronic gulf, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_46">46</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sarsina, Sassina, ii. <a href="#Page_232">232</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Saticula, ii. <a href="#Page_127">127</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Saturnia, ii. <a href="#Page_214">214</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sauini, ii. <a href="#Page_158">158</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Σαύνιον, Σαυνῖται, ii. <a href="#Page_158">158</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Savigny, ii. <a href="#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Savini, ii. <a href="#Page_158">158</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Savoy, ii. <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Saw mills, ii. <a href="#Page_309">309</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Saxons, ii. <a href="#Page_321">321</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scala, ii. <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scaliger, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_238">238</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scardus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_157">157</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_283">283</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_284">284</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scepsis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_218">218</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scheria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_272">272</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Schola Saxonum, ii. <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scholiast of Juvenal, ii. <a href="#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scholiast of the Odyssey, ii. <a href="#Page_180">180</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scholiast of Virgil, ii. <a href="#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scholiasts, ii. <a href="#Page_240">240</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">of Apollonius and the Iliad, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sciathos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_180">180</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scidros, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scillus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_79">79</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scione, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_228">228</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sciri, ii. <a href="#Page_325">325</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scironian rocks, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_90">90</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scodra, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_301">301</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_312">312</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scolos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_120">120</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scomius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_284">284</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scopades, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_164">164</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scopelos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_180">180</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scotland, ii. <a href="#Page_321">321</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scriptores historiae Augustae, ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_371">[371]</span>Scriptores rei agrariae, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scriptores rei rusticae, ii. <a href="#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scupi, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_283">283</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_285">285</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scylax of Caryanda, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_188">188</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_229">229</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_298">298</a>; + ii. <a href="#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="#Page_158">158</a>, <a href="#Page_312">312</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scylletion, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scymnus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_248">248</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_298">298</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scyros, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_105">105</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_180">180</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Scythae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_244">244</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_310">310</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_326">326</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Segesta, ii. <a href="#Page_269">269</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Segre, ii. <a href="#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Seleucus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Selinus, ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_264">264</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sellasia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Selle, ii. <a href="#Page_204">204</a>; comp. <a href="#Elea">Elea</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Σελλοί, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_25">25</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Selymbria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_237">237</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Semita, ii. <a href="#Page_65">65</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sena Gallia, ii. <a href="#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sena Julia, ii. <a href="#Page_226">226</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Seneca, ii. <a href="#Page_290">290</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Senones, ii. <a href="#Page_236">236</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Septa, ii. <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Septimontium, ii. <a href="#Page_42">42</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sequana, ii. <a href="#Page_319">319</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sequani, ii. <a href="#Page_312">312</a>, <a href="#Page_316">316</a>, <a href="#Page_317">317</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Seres, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_231">231</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Seriphos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_186">186</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Serrae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_231">231</a></li> + +<li class="indx">De Serre, ii. <a href="#Page_74">74</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Servitude, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_205">205</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Servius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_260">260</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Servius Tullius, wall of, ii. <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sesamos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_250">250</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sestos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_235">235</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Shakespere, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_107">107</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Shaw, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_8">8</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Shilha, ii. <a href="#Page_334">334</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sibylla, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_212">212</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sicani, ii. <a href="#Page_254">254</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Siceli, ii. <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sicilia, ii. <a href="#Page_253">253</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sicilienses, ii. <a href="#Page_270">270</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Siceliotae, ii. <a href="#Page_270">270</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Sicily, ii. <a href="#Page_256">256</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">the two Sicilies, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_181">181</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sicoris, ii. <a href="#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Siculi, ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_270">270</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Sicyon">Sicyon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_51">51</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Σιδηροφορεῖν, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_125">125</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_137">137</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sidicini, ii. <a href="#Page_128">128</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sidonius Apollinaris, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_292">292</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Sierra Morena, ii. <a href="#Page_280">280</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sigonius, ii. <a href="#Page_32">32</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sila, forest, ii. <a href="#Page_19">19</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Silarus, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_23">23</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Silius Italicus, ii. <a href="#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Silver mines in Attica, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_91">91</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_295">295</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Siphnos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_186">186</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Spain, ii. <a href="#Page_283">283</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Thasos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_183">183</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Thrace, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_284">284</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_285">285</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Simonides, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Singitian gulf, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sinope, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_249">249</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sinuessa, ii. <a href="#Page_132">132</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Siphnos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_186">186</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sipontum, ii. <a href="#Page_174">174</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Siris, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Siritis, ii. <a href="#Page_192">192</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sismondi, ii. <a href="#Page_37">37</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Sithonia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_226">226</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_229">229</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_230">230</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_280">280</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Slaves, in Aegina, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_54">54</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Athens, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_108">108</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_119">119</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Italy, ii. <a href="#Page_183">183</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Corinth, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_108">108</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Slave trade in Delos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_185">185</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Slavery, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_205">205</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Slavonian languages, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_303">303</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Smyrna, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_214">214</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Social War, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_240">240</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_113">113</a>, <a href="#Page_151">151</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sol, temple of, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Soli, ii. <a href="#Page_349">349</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Solinus, ii. <a href="#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Soloeis, ii. <a href="#Page_267">267</a>, <a href="#Page_268">268</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sophocles, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sora, ii. <a href="#Page_120">120</a>, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sostratus of Cnidus, ii. <a href="#Page_346">346</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Σωτῆρες θεοί, ii. <a href="#Page_347">347</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Spalatro, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_314">314</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Spain, ii. <a href="#Page_279">279</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Spania, ii. <a href="#Page_280">280</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Spaniards, ii. <a href="#Page_285">285</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Sparta">Sparta, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_60">60</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Spartan kings, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_58">58</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Spartus, ii. <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Spercheus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Spezzia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_54">54</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sphacteria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Spoletium, ii. <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Spon and Wheler, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_8">8</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sporades, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_183">183</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Stadium, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_45">45</a> <i>n.</i> 1;</li> + <li class="isub1">at Athens, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_97">97</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Stagira, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_231">231</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Statius, ii. <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_204">204</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Στενὰ τῆς Ἀντιγονείας, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_268">268</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Stenyclaros, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_69">69</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Stephanus Byzantinus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_261">261</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sthenelus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_34">34</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Στοὰ βασίλειος, ii. <a href="#Page_79">79</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Store Seitz, ii. <a href="#Page_37">37</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Strabo, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_101">101</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_218">218</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_249">249</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_275">275</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_283">283</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_297">297</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_304">304</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_307">307</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_140">140</a>, <a href="#Page_144">144</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_163">163</a>, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="#Page_174">174</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_242">242</a>, <a href="#Page_282">282</a>, <a href="#Page_294">294</a>, <a href="#Page_304">304</a>, <a href="#Page_336">336</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Strategi, in Phocis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_132">132</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Stratos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_150">150</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Streets of the Romans, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Στροβιλοειδής, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_221">221</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Strymon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_231">231</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_282">282</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_372">[372]</span>Strymonian gulf, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_281">281</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Stuart, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_96">96</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Stymphaea">Stymphaei, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_258">258</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_269">269</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Stymphalian lake, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_74">74</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Stymphalus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_74">74</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Styra, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_178">178</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Styx, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_257">257</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Subura, ii. <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Suburbicariae provinciae, ii. <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Suburbs of Rome, ii. <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sulphureous springs, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_146">146</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Summer at Rome, ii. <a href="#Page_57">57</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Suetonius, ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sulci, ii. <a href="#Page_276">276</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Suliots, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_258">258</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sulmo, ii. <a href="#Page_157">157</a></li> + +<li class="indx">P. Sulpicius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_55">55</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ser. Sulpicius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_90">90</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sulpicius Severus, ii. <a href="#Page_25">25</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Sunion">Sunion, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_91">91</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Superum mare, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Surrentum, ii. <a href="#Page_166">166</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sutrium, ii. <a href="#Page_225">225</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Switzerland, French part of, ii. <a href="#Page_10">10</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sybaris, ii. <a href="#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_190">190</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Syme, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_32">32</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Sympolity, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_140">140</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Synesius, ii. <a href="#Page_329">329</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Συνοικισμός, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_294">294</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Syracuse, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a>: ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">population, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_261">261</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">province, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_268">268</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Syros, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Syrtes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_256">256</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Tabernae, s. mensae argentariorum, ii. <a href="#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tacitus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_11">11</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_302">302</a>, <a href="#Page_306">306</a>, <a href="#Page_312">312</a>, <a href="#Page_319">319</a>, <a href="#Page_321">321</a>, <a href="#Page_322">322</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Taenarus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_60">60</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ταγός, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_164">164</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tagus, ii. <a href="#Page_282">282</a>, <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Taman, Tamacan, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_247">247</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tamyrace, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_247">247</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tanagra, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_122">122</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tanais, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_23">23</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">town, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_247">247</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Taphians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_148">148</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tar, manufacture of, ii. <a href="#Page_185">185</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Taraco, ii. <a href="#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tarentum, ii. <a href="#Page_185">185</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tarpeian rock, ii. <a href="#Page_66">66</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tarpeius mons, ii. <a href="#Page_41">41</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tarquinii, ii. <a href="#Page_212">212</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tarquinius, father or son, ii. <a href="#Page_47">47</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tarquinius Priscus, ii. <a href="#Page_59">59</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tartessus, ii. <a href="#Page_287">287</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tauchira, ii. <a href="#Page_329">329</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Taulantii, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_300">300</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_306">306</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_308">308</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ταυρική, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_244">244</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Taurini, ii. <a href="#Page_252">252</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Taurisci, ii. <a href="#Page_325">325</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ταῦροι, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_244">244</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tauromenium, ii. <a href="#Page_266">266</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Taygetus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_66">66</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Teanum, ii. <a href="#Page_128">128</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Teate, ii. <a href="#Page_157">157</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tectosagae, ii. <a href="#Page_304">304</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tegea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_72">72</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Τεῖχος, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_111">111</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Telegonus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_153">153</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Telemachus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temenus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_57">57</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temese, ii. <a href="#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temnos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_216">216</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tempe, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_174">174</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Aesculapius, ii. <a href="#Page_104">104</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Apollo at Gryneon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_216">216</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of the Palatine Apollo, ii. <a href="#Page_217">217</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple, the Capitoline, ii. <a href="#Page_67">67</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Concordia, ii. <a href="#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Diana, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">of Diana Aricina, ii. <a href="#Page_113">113</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">of Diana at Ephesus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_210">210</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Juno Lacinia, ii. <a href="#Page_199">199</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Juno Lanuvina, ii. <a href="#Page_113">113</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Jupiter Latiaris, ii. <a href="#Page_108">108</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Jupiter Stator, ii. <a href="#Page_76">76</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Castor, ii. <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Mars Ultor, ii. <a href="#Page_82">82</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Roma and Augustus, ii. <a href="#Page_293">293</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Saturn, ii. <a href="#Page_77">77</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Sibylla, ii. <a href="#Page_112">112</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Sol, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Venus Erycina, ii. <a href="#Page_257">257</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Venus Genitrix, ii. <a href="#Page_81">81</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temple of Vesta, ii. <a href="#Page_75">75</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Temples, Roman, ii. <a href="#Page_68">68</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Templum (the Rostra), ii. <a href="#Page_74">74</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Templum Minervae Medicae, ii. <a href="#Page_95">95</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tenea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_51">51</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tenedos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_215">215</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_217">217</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_218">218</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tenos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_187">187</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Teos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_211">211</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Terni, see <a href="#Interamna">Interamna</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Terra di Lavoro, ii. <a href="#Page_12">12</a>; comp. <a href="#Campagna_di_Lavoro">Campagna di Lavoro</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Terra di Lecce, ii. <a href="#Page_176">176</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Terra d’Otranto, ii. <a href="#Page_176">176</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Terracina">Terracina, ii. <a href="#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tetradrachmae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_281">281</a>; comp. <a href="#Drachmae">drachmae</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Τετραρχία, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_163">163</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Teucrian Trojans, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_287">287</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Teutones, ii. <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="#Page_326">326</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Teverone, see <a href="#Anio">Anio</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Tharyps, Tharypas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_261">261</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thasos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_114">114</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_182">182</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Theagenes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_88">88</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Theatre at Athens, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_98">98</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Piraeeus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_102">102</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Theatre of Marcellus, ii. <a href="#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_373">[373]</span>Theatre of Pompey, ii. <a href="#Page_90">90</a>, <a href="#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Theatres in Rome, ii. <a href="#Page_90">90</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thebe in Phthiotis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_171">171</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thebes in Egypt, ii. <a href="#Page_343">343</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thebes in Boeotia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_114">114</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_118">118</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_120">120</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_261">261</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Themistius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_292">292</a> <i>n.</i></li> + +<li class="indx">Themistocles, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_100">100</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Theodosia, Theudosia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_246">246</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Theophrastus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_220">220</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Theopompus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_158">158</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_163">163</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_253">253</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_298">298</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_300">300</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thera, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_189">189</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Therma, Thermitani, ii. <a href="#Page_266">266</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Therma">Therma (Thessalonica), <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_282">282</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermae, ii. <a href="#Page_94">94</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermae of Agrippa, ii. <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermae of C. and L. Caesar, ii. <a href="#Page_95">95</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermae of Caracalla, ii. <a href="#Page_95">95</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermae of Decius, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermae of Diocletian, ii. <a href="#Page_95">95</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermae of Nero, ii. <a href="#Page_95">95</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermae of Alexander Severus, ii. <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermae of Septimius Severus, ii. <a href="#Page_95">95</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermae of Titus, ii. <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermae of Trajan, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermaic gulf, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_146">146</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thermopylae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_129">129</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">pass of, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_157">157</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Θέρος χρυσοῦν, ii. <a href="#Page_193">193</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thespiae, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_115">115</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_121">121</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Theseus, temple of, at Athens, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_93">93</a> <i>n.</i>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_107">107</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thesprotia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_256">256</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thesprotians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_259">259</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_260">260</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thessalians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_113">113</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_160">160</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_123">123</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thessaliotis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_162">162</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thessalonica, see <a href="#Therma">Therma</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Thessaly, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_280">280</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Κοινὸν Θεσσαλῶν, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_161">161</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">fasti of the strategi, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_166">166</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">Thessalian women, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_172">172</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Θολερός, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_145">145</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Θόλος, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_98">98</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thrace, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_280">280</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thracians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_232">232</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_287">287</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_288">288</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_8">8</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Thria, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Θριάσιον πεδίον, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thrinacia, ii. <a href="#Page_257">257</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thucydides, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_1">1</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_92">92</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_94">94</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_110">110</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_125">125</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_136">136</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_137">137</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_138">138</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_147">147</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_184">184</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_190">190</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_251">251</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_260">260</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_284">284</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="#Page_186">186</a>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_256">256</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thurii, ii. <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_195">195</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Thuscia">Thuscia suburbicaria, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thybris, see <a href="#Tiber">Tiber</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Θυεῖν, ii. <a href="#Page_85">85</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Thyrea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_39">39</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Tiber">Tiber, ii. <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tiberina insula, ii. <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tiberius, emperor, ii. <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tibullus, ii. <a href="#Page_29">29</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tibur, ii. <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_111">111</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tiburnus, see <a href="#Anio">Anio</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Ticinum, ii. <a href="#Page_241">241</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ticinus, ii. <a href="#Page_236">236</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tides in the Mediterranean, ii. <a href="#Page_331">331</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Timaeus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_128">128</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_298">298</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Timber, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Timoleon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_49">49</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_261">261</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tin, trade in, ii. <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tiparenus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_44">44</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tiryns, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_114">114</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tisamenus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_57">57</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tivoli, ii. <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tmarus, or Tomarus mons, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_260">260</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_269">269</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Τοιχώρυχος, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Toledo, ii. <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Toletum, ii. <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tolemata, ii. <a href="#Page_330">330</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tolosa, ii. <a href="#Page_317">317</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tomb of Hadrian, ii. <a href="#Page_101">101</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tomi, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_242">242</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Toronean gulf, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_231">231</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_286">286</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Torona, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_230">230</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Totila, ii. <a href="#Page_58">58</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tournefort, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_8">8</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trachinians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_142">142</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trachis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_171">171</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tractus Aremoricus, ii. <a href="#Page_318">318</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trajan, ii. <a href="#Page_57">57</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trajan, column of, ii. <a href="#Page_84">84</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Transpadani, ii. <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_236">236</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trans Tiberim, ii. <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_54">54</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trapani, ii. <a href="#Page_268">268</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trapezus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_248">248</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trastevere, ii. <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Treres, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_221">221</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tretus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_39">39</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Treves, ii. <a href="#Page_320">320</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Treviri, ii. <a href="#Page_319">319</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Triballi, ii. <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="#Page_326">326</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tribus Materina, ii. <a href="#Page_232">232</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tribus Quirina, ii. <a href="#Page_149">149</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tribus Sapinia, ii. <a href="#Page_232">232</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tribus Velina, ii. <a href="#Page_232">232</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tricca, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_167">167</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trichonis, Lake, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_146">146</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trinacia, ii. <a href="#Page_257">257</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trinacria, ii. <a href="#Page_257">257</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Triphylia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_34">34</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Triphylians, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_70">70</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_79">79</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tripodes, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_87">87</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tripolis, ii. <a href="#Page_332">332</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tritaea, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_80">80</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Triumphal Fasti, ii. <a href="#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Triumphal arch of Caligula, ii. <a href="#Page_96">96</a></li> + +<li class="indx">—— —— —— Constantine, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_374">[374]</span>Triumphal arch of Gratian, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">—— —— —— Septimius Severus, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">—— —— —— Titus, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">—— —— —— Trajan, ii. <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">—— —— —— Valentinian, ii. <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Troezen, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_42">42</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trogus Pompeius, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_264">264</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trojan war, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_217">217</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Trojans, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tuder, ii. <a href="#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tufo, ii. <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_46">46</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tunese language, ii. <a href="#Page_338">338</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tunis, Tunes, ii. <a href="#Page_332">332</a>, <a href="#Page_339">339</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tunny fisheries, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_239">239</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_250">250</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tunnel of lake Copais, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_117">117</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">of the Alban lake, ii. <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="#Page_108">108</a>, <a href="#Page_114">114</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Turduli, ii. <a href="#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Turia, ii. <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Turingi, ii. <a href="#Page_251">251</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Turini, ii. <a href="#Page_211">211</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Turkish language, ii. <a href="#Page_205">205</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Turni, ii. <a href="#Page_211">211</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Turnus, ii. <a href="#Page_170">170</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tusci, ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_211">211</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tuscia, ii. <a href="#Page_26">26</a>; comp. <a href="#Thuscia">Thuscia</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Tuscia et Umbria, ii. <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tusculana, scil. civitas, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_237">237</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tusculum, ii. <a href="#Page_109">109</a>, <a href="#Page_211">211</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tycha, ii. <a href="#Page_259">259</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tymphaea, see <a href="#Stymphaea">Stymphaea</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Τυραννίς, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_88">88</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Τύραννοι in Phocis, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_132">132</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tyras, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_243">243</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tyrrheni, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_191">191</a>,231; ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_37">37</a>, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>, <a href="#Page_205">205</a>, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>, <a href="#Page_292">292</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Tyrrhenicum mare, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Ufens, ii. <a href="#Page_40">40</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ulpium, not Ulpianum, Forum, ii. <a href="#Page_83">83</a></li> + +<li class="indx">—— <i>ulus</i>, the termination, ii. <a href="#Page_168">168</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Umbri, ii. <a href="#Page_11">11</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Umbria, ii. <a href="#Page_231">231</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Umbro, river, ii. <a href="#Page_232">232</a></li> + +<li class="indx">University at Athens, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_105">105</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Utica, ii. <a href="#Page_332">332</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Vaccaei, ii. <a href="#Page_298">298</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Valentia, ii. <a href="#Page_291">291</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Valeria, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Valesius, see <a href="#Valois">Valois</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx" id="Valois">Valois, the brothers, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_7">7</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Varro, ii. <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Varus, river, ii. <a href="#Page_9">9</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vascones, ii. <a href="#Page_302">302</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vasilipotamos, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_60">60</a>; comp. <a href="#Eurotas">Eurotas</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Vaticanus mons, ii. <a href="#Page_44">44</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vaudoncourt, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_257">257</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Veii, ii. <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Velabrum, ii. <a href="#Page_47">47</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Velia">Velia, ii. <a href="#Page_98">98</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Velia, ii. <a href="#Page_204">204</a>; comp. <a href="#Elea">Elea</a>.</li> + +<li class="indx">Velinus, ii. <a href="#Page_147">147</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Velitrae, ii. <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_120">120</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Velleius, ii. <a href="#Page_144">144</a>, <a href="#Page_160">160</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vendée, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_311">311</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Veneti, ii. <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>, <a href="#Page_246">246</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Venetia, ii. <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Venetia et Histria, ii. <a href="#Page_27">27</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Venice, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_102">102</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_217">217</a>, <a href="#Page_248">248</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Venusia, ii. <a href="#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="#Page_174">174</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ver sacrum, ii. <a href="#Page_144">144</a>, <a href="#Page_151">151</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Verona, ii. <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_243">243</a>, <a href="#Page_245">245</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Verulae, ii. <a href="#Page_116">116</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vestini, ii. <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_142">142</a>, <a href="#Page_153">153</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vesulus, ii. <a href="#Page_121">121</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vetulonium, ii. <a href="#Page_221">221</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Aelia, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Aemilia, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Appia, ii. <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Ardeatina, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Aurelia, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Campana, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Cassia, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via de’ Cerci, ii. <a href="#Page_89">89</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Domitiana, ii. <a href="#Page_29">29</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Egnatia, ii. <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Flaminia, ii. <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Labicana, ii. <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Latina, ii. <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Nomentana, ii. <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Ostiensis, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Portuensis, ii. <a href="#Page_63">63</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Praenestina, ii. <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Sacra, ii. <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_98">98</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Salaria, ii. <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Tiburtina, ii. <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Via Valeria, ii. <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vibo Valentia, ii. <a href="#Page_203">203</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vicus Cornelius, ii. <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vicus Patricius, ii. <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vicus Sceleratus, ii. <a href="#Page_86">86</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vienna, ii. <a href="#Page_316">316</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Viminalis mons, ii. <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_99">99</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vindelici, ii. <a href="#Page_324">324</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vine, cultivation of in Boeotia, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_117">117</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Italy, ii. <a href="#Page_14">14</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Peloponnesus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_31">31</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Virgil, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_125">125</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_158">158</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_34">34</a>, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>, <a href="#Page_146">146</a>, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_262">262</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Viteliu, ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vitellia, ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vitellius, Vitalus, ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vitulus, ii. <a href="#Page_3">3</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Volaterrae, ii. <a href="#Page_212">212</a>, <a href="#Page_219">219</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Volcanic veins, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_146">146</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">in Italy, ii. <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a></li> + +<li class="indx"><span class="pagenum" id="Page_375">[375]</span>Volsci, ii. <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_119">119</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Voltaire, ii. <a href="#Page_6">6</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Voss, J. H., <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_22">22</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_121">121</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vulsinii, ii. <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">lake, ii. <a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_225">225</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vulturnum, ii. <a href="#Page_127">127</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Vulturnus, ii. <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_128">128</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Wall of Servius Tullius, ii. <a href="#Page_49">49</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">of Aurelian, ii. <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">of Honorius, ii. <a href="#Page_58">58</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Wallace, ii. <a href="#Page_129">129</a></li> + +<li class="indx">War, the Sacred, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_133">133</a>;</li> + <li class="isub1">the Lamian, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_139">139</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Washington, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_129">129</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Wasiliki, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_53">53</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Water, quantity of at different periods, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_29">29</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Watering places, ii. <a href="#Page_94">94</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Water mills, ii. <a href="#Page_309">309</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Wendish language, ii. <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_208">208</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Westphalia, ii. <a href="#Page_301">301</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Wheler, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_8">8</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Wieland, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_233">233</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Wik, Wich, ii. <a href="#Page_36">36</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Winds, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_15">15</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Wolf, Fr. A., <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_253">253</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_196">196</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Wood, trade in, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_295">295</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Wool, Spanish, ii. <a href="#Page_283">283</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Xanthus of Lydia, ii. <a href="#Page_211">211</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Xenophon, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_104">104</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_229">229</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ξόανον, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_97">97</a></li> + +<li class="ifrst">Zacynthus, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_143">143</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_153">153</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_154">154</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Zama, ii. <a href="#Page_339">339</a></li> + +<li class="indx" id="Zancle">Zancle, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_176">176</a>; ii. <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_264">264</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Zeno, the Stoic, ii. <a href="#Page_349">349</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Zephyrium, cape, ii. <a href="#Page_200">200</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Zeugitana, ii. <a href="#Page_339">339</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Ζεὺς Ἐλευθέριος, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_121">121</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Zmyrna, <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/files/78451/78451-h/78451-h.htm#Page_215">215</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Zoëga, ii. <a href="#Page_70">70</a></li> + +<li class="indx">Zurlo, Count, ii. <a href="#Page_163">163</a></li> + +</ul> + +<p class="titlepage">THE END.</p> + +<p class="center smaller">WERTHEIMER AND CO., PRINTERS, FINSBURY CIRCUS</p> + +<div style='text-align:center'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 78452 ***</div> +</body> +</html> diff --git a/78452-h/images/cover.jpg b/78452-h/images/cover.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..20886d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/78452-h/images/cover.jpg |
