summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/old/53910-0.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'old/53910-0.txt')
-rw-r--r--old/53910-0.txt2757
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 2757 deletions
diff --git a/old/53910-0.txt b/old/53910-0.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index 91e701b..0000000
--- a/old/53910-0.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,2757 +0,0 @@
-The Project Gutenberg EBook of The School and Society, by John Dewey
-
-This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
-other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
-whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of
-the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at
-www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have
-to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook.
-
-Title: The School and Society
- Being three lectures
-
-Author: John Dewey
-
-Release Date: January 7, 2017 [EBook #53910]
-
-Language: English
-
-Character set encoding: UTF-8
-
-*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE SCHOOL AND SOCIETY ***
-
-
-
-
-Produced by Richard Tonsing and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images generously made available by The
-Internet Archive)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- THE SCHOOL AND SOCIETY
-
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS
- CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
-
-
- Agents
-
- THE CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS
- LONDON AND EDINBURGH
-
- THE MARUZEN-KABUSHIKI-KAISHA
- TOKYO, OSAKA, KYOTO
-
- KARL W. HIERSEMANN
- LEIPZIG
-
- THE BAKER & TAYLOR COMPANY
- NEW YORK
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- _The_
- _SCHOOL_
- _and_
- _SOCIETY_
- _BEING THREE LECTURES_
-
-
- _by_
-
- JOHN DEWEY
-
- _SUPPLEMENTED BY_
- A STATEMENT OF THE UNIVERSITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
-
- THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO PRESS
- CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- COPYRIGHT 1900 BY
- JOHN DEWEY
-
- All Rights Reserved
-
- FIRST EDITION -–1,000 copies. Printed November, 1899.
- SECOND IMPRESSION -–1,500 copies. Printed February, 1900.
- THIRD IMPRESSION -–5,000 copies. Printed July, 1900.
- FOURTH IMPRESSION -–1,000 copies. Printed June, 1904.
- FIFTH IMPRESSION -–2,500 copies. Printed February, 1905.
- SIXTH IMPRESSION -–2,500 copies. Printed August, 1907.
- SEVENTH IMPRESSION -–1,000 copies. Printed September, 1909.
- EIGHTH IMPRESSION -–1,000 copies. Printed August, 1910.
- NINTH IMPRESSION -–1,000 copies. Printed August, 1911.
- TENTH IMPRESSION -–1,000 copies. Printed March, 1912.
- ELEVENTH IMPRESSION -–2,000 copies. Printed August, 1913.
-
-
- Composed and Printed By
- The University of Chicago Press
- Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- TO
-
- MRS. EMMONS BLAINE
-
- TO WHOSE INTEREST IN EDUCATIONAL
- REFORM
- THE APPEARANCE OF THIS BOOK
- IS DUE
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- CONTENTS
-
-
- PAGE
- I. THE SCHOOL AND SOCIAL PROGRESS 19
-
- II. THE SCHOOL AND THE LIFE OF THE CHILD 47
-
- III. WASTE IN EDUCATION 77
-
- IV. THREE YEARS OF THE UNIVERSITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 113
-
-
-
-
- LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
-
-
- FACING PAGE
-
- DRAWING OF A CAVE AND TREES 56
-
- DRAWING OF A FOREST 58
-
- DRAWING OF HANDS SPINNING 60
-
- DRAWING OF A GIRL SPINNING 62
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- PUBLISHER’S NOTE
-
-
-The three lectures presented in the following pages were delivered
-before an audience of parents and others interested in the University
-Elementary School, in the month of April of the year 1899. Mr. Dewey
-revised them in part from a stenographic report, and unimportant changes
-and the slight adaptations necessary for the press have been made in his
-absence. The lectures retain therefore the unstudied character as well
-as the power of the spoken word. As they imply more or less familiarity
-with the work of the Elementary School, Mr. Dewey’s supplementary
-statement of this has been added.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- AUTHOR’S NOTE
-
-
-A second edition affords a grateful opportunity for recalling that this
-little book is a sign of the coöperating thoughts and sympathies of many
-persons. Its indebtedness to Mrs. Emmons Blaine is partly indicated in
-the dedication. From my friends, Mr. and Mrs. George Herbert Mead, came
-that interest, unflagging attention to detail, and artistic taste which,
-in my absence, remade colloquial remarks until they were fit to print,
-and then saw the results through the press with the present attractive
-result—a mode of authorship made easy, which I recommend to others
-fortunate enough to possess such friends.
-
-It would be an extended paragraph which should list all the friends
-whose timely and persisting generosity has made possible the school
-which inspired and defined the ideas of these pages. These friends, I am
-sure, would be the first to recognize the peculiar appropriateness of
-especial mention of the names of Mrs. Charles R. Crane and Mrs. William
-R. Linn.
-
-And the school itself in its educational work is a joint undertaking.
-Many have engaged in shaping it. The clear and experienced intelligence
-of my wife is wrought everywhere into its texture. The wisdom, tact and
-devotion of its instructors have brought about a transformation of its
-original amorphous plans into articulate form and substance with life
-and movement of their own. Whatever the issue of the ideas presented in
-this book, the satisfaction coming from the coöperation of the diverse
-thoughts and deeds of many persons in undertaking to enlarge the life of
-the child will abide.
-
- January 5, 1900
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- I
- THE SCHOOL AND SOCIAL PROGRESS
-
-
-We are apt to look at the school from an individualistic standpoint, as
-something between teacher and pupil, or between teacher and parent. That
-which interests us most is naturally the progress made by the individual
-child of our acquaintance, his normal physical development, his advance
-in ability to read, write, and figure, his growth in the knowledge of
-geography and history, improvement in manners, habits of promptness,
-order, and industry—it is from such standards as these that we judge the
-work of the school. And rightly so. Yet the range of the outlook needs
-to be enlarged. What the best and wisest parent wants for his own child,
-that must the community want for all of its children. Any other ideal
-for our schools is narrow and unlovely; acted upon, it destroys our
-democracy. All that society has accomplished for itself is put, through
-the agency of the school, at the disposal of its future members. All its
-better thoughts of itself it hopes to realize through the new
-possibilities thus opened to its future self. Here individualism and
-socialism are at one. Only by being true to the full growth of all the
-individuals who make it up, can society by any chance be true to itself.
-And in the self-direction thus given, nothing counts as much as the
-school, for, as Horace Mann said, “Where anything is growing, one former
-is worth a thousand re-formers,”
-
-Whenever we have in mind the discussion of a new movement in education,
-it is especially necessary to take the broader, or social view.
-Otherwise, changes in the school institution and tradition will be
-looked at as the arbitrary inventions of particular teachers; at the
-worst transitory fads, and at the best merely improvements in certain
-details—and this is the plane upon which it is too customary to consider
-school changes. It is as rational to conceive of the locomotive or the
-telegraph as personal devices. The modification going on in the method
-and curriculum of education is as much a product of the changed social
-situation, and as much an effort to meet the needs of the new society
-that is forming, as are changes in modes of industry and commerce.
-
-It is to this, then, that I especially ask your attention: the effort to
-conceive what roughly may be termed the “New Education” in the light of
-larger changes in society. Can we connect this “New Education” with the
-general march of events? If we can, it will lose its isolated character,
-and will cease to be an affair which proceeds only from the
-over-ingenious minds of pedagogues dealing with particular pupils. It
-will appear as part and parcel of the whole social evolution, and, in
-its more general features at least, as inevitable. Let us then ask after
-the main aspects of the social movement; and afterwards turn to the
-school to find what witness it gives of effort to put itself in line.
-And since it is quite impossible to cover the whole ground, I shall for
-the most part confine myself to one typical thing in the modern school
-movement—that which passes under the name of manual training, hoping if
-the relation of that to changed social conditions appears, we shall be
-ready to concede the point as well regarding other educational
-innovations.
-
-I make no apology for not dwelling at length upon the social changes in
-question. Those I shall mention are writ so large that he who runs may
-read. The change that comes first to mind, the one that overshadows and
-even controls all others, is the industrial one—the application of
-science resulting in the great inventions that have utilized the forces
-of nature on a vast and inexpensive scale: the growth of a world-wide
-market as the object of production, of vast manufacturing centers to
-supply this market, of cheap and rapid means of communication and
-distribution between all its parts. Even as to its feebler beginnings,
-this change is not much more than a century old; in many of its most
-important aspects it falls within the short span of those now living.
-One can hardly believe there has been a revolution in all history so
-rapid, so extensive, so complete. Through it the face of the earth is
-making over, even as to its physical forms; political boundaries are
-wiped out and moved about, as if they were indeed only lines on a paper
-map; population is hurriedly gathered into cities from the ends of the
-earth; habits of living are altered with startling abruptness and
-thoroughness; the search for the truths of nature is infinitely
-stimulated and facilitated and their application to life made not only
-practicable, but commercially necessary. Even our moral and religious
-ideas and interests, the most conservative because the deepest-lying
-things in our nature, are profoundly affected. That this revolution
-should not affect education in other than formal and superficial fashion
-is inconceivable.
-
-Back of the factory system lies the household and neighborhood system.
-Those of us who are here today need go back only one, two, or at most
-three generations, to find a time when the household was practically the
-center in which were carried on, or about which were clustered, all the
-typical forms of industrial occupation. The clothing worn was for the
-most part not only made in the house, but the members of the household
-were usually familiar with the shearing of the sheep, the carding and
-spinning of the wool, and the plying of the loom. Instead of pressing a
-button and flooding the house with electric light, the whole process of
-getting illumination was followed in its toilsome length, from the
-killing of the animal and the trying of fat, to the making of wicks and
-dipping of candles. The supply of flour, of lumber, of foods, of
-building materials, of household furniture, even of metal ware, of
-nails, hinges, hammers, etc., was in the immediate neighborhood, in
-shops which were constantly open to inspection and often centers of
-neighborhood congregation. The entire industrial process stood revealed,
-from the production on the farm of the raw materials, till the finished
-article was actually put to use. Not only this, but practically every
-member of the household had his own share in the work. The children, as
-they gained in strength and capacity, were gradually initiated into the
-mysteries of the several processes. It was a matter of immediate and
-personal concern, even to the point of actual participation.
-
-We cannot overlook the factors of discipline and of character-building
-involved in this: training in habits of order and of industry, and in
-the idea of responsibility, of obligation to do something, to produce
-something, in the world. There was always something which really needed
-to be done, and a real necessity that each member of the household
-should do his own part faithfully and in coöperation with others.
-Personalities which became effective in action were bred and tested in
-the medium of action. Again, we cannot overlook the importance for
-educational purposes of the close and intimate acquaintance got with
-nature at first hand, with real things and materials, with the actual
-processes of their manipulation, and the knowledge of their social
-necessities and uses. In all this there was continual training of
-observation, of ingenuity, constructive imagination, of logical thought,
-and of the sense of reality acquired through first-hand contact with
-actualities. The educative forces of the domestic spinning and weaving,
-of the saw-mill, the gristmill, the cooper shop, and the blacksmith
-forge, were continuously operative.
-
-No number of object-lessons, got up _as_ object-lessons for the sake of
-giving information, can afford even the shadow of a substitute for
-acquaintance with the plants and animals of the farm and garden,
-acquired through actual living among them and caring for them. No
-training of sense-organs in school, introduced for the sake of training,
-can begin to compete with the alertness and fullness of sense-life that
-comes through daily intimacy and interest in familiar occupations.
-Verbal memory can be trained in committing tasks, a certain discipline
-of the reasoning powers can be acquired through lessons in science and
-mathematics; but, after all, this is somewhat remote and shadowy
-compared with the training of attention and of judgment that is acquired
-in having to do things with a real motive behind and a real outcome
-ahead. At present, concentration of industry and division of labor have
-practically eliminated household and neighborhood occupations—at least
-for educational purposes. But it is useless to bemoan the departure of
-the good old days of children’s modesty, reverence, and implicit
-obedience, if we expect merely by bemoaning and by exhortation to bring
-them back. It is radical conditions which have changed, and only an
-equally radical change in education suffices. We must recognize our
-compensations—the increase in toleration, in breadth of social judgment,
-the larger acquaintance with human nature, the sharpened alertness in
-reading signs of character and interpreting social situations, greater
-accuracy of adaptation to differing personalities, contact with greater
-commercial activities. These considerations mean much to the city-bred
-child of today. Yet there is a real problem: how shall we retain these
-advantages, and yet introduce into the school something representing the
-other side of life—occupations which exact personal responsibilities and
-which train the child with relation to the physical realities of life?
-
-When we turn to the school, we find that one of the most striking
-tendencies at present is toward the introduction of so-called manual
-training, shop-work, and the household arts—sewing and cooking.
-
-This has not been done “on purpose,” with a full consciousness that the
-school must now supply that factor of training formerly taken care of in
-the home, but rather by instinct, by experimenting and finding that such
-work takes a vital hold of pupils and gives them something which was not
-to be got in any other way. Consciousness of its real import is still so
-weak that the work is often done in a half-hearted, confused, and
-unrelated way. The reasons assigned to justify it are painfully
-inadequate or sometimes even positively wrong.
-
-If we were to cross-examine even those who are most favorably disposed
-to the introduction of this work into our school system, we should, I
-imagine, generally find the main reasons to be that such work engages
-the full spontaneous interest and attention of the children. It keeps
-them alert and active, instead of passive and receptive; it makes them
-more useful, more capable, and hence more inclined to be helpful at
-home; it prepares them to some extent for the practical duties of later
-life—the girls to be more efficient house managers, if not actually
-cooks and sempstresses; the boys (were our educational system only
-adequately rounded out into trade schools) for their future vocations. I
-do not underestimate the worth of these reasons. Of those indicated by
-the changed attitude of the children I shall indeed have something to
-say in my next talk, when speaking directly of the relationship of the
-school to the child. But the point of view is, upon the whole,
-unnecessarily narrow. We must conceive of work in wood and metal, of
-weaving, sewing, and cooking, as methods of life not as distinct
-studies.
-
-We must conceive of them in their social significance, as types of the
-processes by which society keeps itself going, as agencies for bringing
-home to the child some of the primal necessities of community life, and
-as ways in which these needs have been met by the growing insight and
-ingenuity of man; in short, as instrumentalities through which the
-school itself shall be made a genuine form of active community life,
-instead of a place set apart in which to learn lessons.
-
-A society is a number of people held together because they are working
-along common lines, in a common spirit, and with reference to common
-aims. The common needs and aims demand a growing interchange of thought
-and growing unity of sympathetic feeling. The radical reason that the
-present school cannot organize itself as a natural social unit is
-because just this element of common and productive activity is absent.
-Upon the playground, in game and sport, social organization takes place
-spontaneously and inevitably. There is something to do, some activity to
-be carried on, requiring natural divisions of labor, selection of
-leaders and followers, mutual coöperation and emulation. In the
-schoolroom the motive and the cement of social organization are alike
-wanting. Upon the ethical side, the tragic weakness of the present
-school is that it endeavors to prepare future members of the social
-order in a medium in which the conditions of the social spirit are
-eminently wanting.
-
-The difference that appears when occupations are made the articulating
-centers of school life is not easy to describe in words; it is a
-difference in motive, of spirit and atmosphere. As one enters a busy
-kitchen in which a group of children are actively engaged in the
-preparation of food, the psychological difference, the change from more
-or less passive and inert recipiency and restraint to one of buoyant
-outgoing energy, is so obvious as fairly to strike one in the face.
-Indeed, to those whose image of the school is rigidly set the change is
-sure to give a shock. But the change in the social attitude is equally
-marked. The mere absorption of facts and truths is so exclusively
-individual an affair that it tends very naturally to pass into
-selfishness. There is no obvious social motive for the acquirement of
-mere learning, there is no clear social gain in success thereat. Indeed,
-almost the only measure for success is a competitive one, in the bad
-sense of that term—a comparison of results in the recitation or in the
-examination to see which child has succeeded in getting ahead of others
-in storing up, in accumulating the maximum of information. So thoroughly
-is this the prevalent atmosphere that for one child to help another in
-his task has become a school crime. Where the school work consists in
-simply learning lessons, mutual assistance, instead of being the most
-natural form of coöperation and association, becomes a clandestine
-effort to relieve one’s neighbor of his proper duties. Where active work
-is going on all this is changed. Helping others, instead of being a form
-of charity which impoverishes the recipient, is simply an aid in setting
-free the powers and furthering the impulse of the one helped. A spirit
-of free communication, of interchange of ideas, suggestions, results,
-both successes and failures of previous experiences, becomes the
-dominating note of the recitation. So far as emulation enters in, it is
-in the comparison of individuals, not with regard to the quantity of
-information personally absorbed, but with reference to the quality of
-work done—the genuine community standard of value. In an informal but
-all the more pervasive way, the school life organizes itself on a social
-basis.
-
-Within this organization is found the principle of school discipline or
-order. Of course, order is simply a thing which is relative to an end.
-If you have the end in view of forty or fifty children learning certain
-set lessons, to be recited to a teacher, your discipline must be devoted
-to securing that result. But if the end in view is the development of a
-spirit of social coöperation and community life, discipline must grow
-out of and be relative to this. There is little order of one sort where
-things are in process of construction; there is a certain disorder in
-any busy workshop; there is not silence; persons are not engaged in
-maintaining certain fixed physical postures; their arms are not folded;
-they are not holding their books thus and so. They are doing a variety
-of things, and there is the confusion, the bustle, that results from
-activity. But out of occupation, out of doing things that are to produce
-results, and out of doing these in a social and coöperative way, there
-is born a discipline of its own kind and type. Our whole conception of
-school discipline changes when we get this point of view. In critical
-moments we all realize that the only discipline that stands by us, the
-only training that becomes intuition, is that got through life itself.
-That we learn from experience, and from books or the sayings of others
-_only_ as they are related to experience, are not mere phrases. But the
-school has been so set apart, so isolated from the ordinary conditions
-and motives of life, that the place where children are sent for
-discipline is the one place in the world where it is most difficult to
-get experience—the mother of all discipline worth the name. It is only
-where a narrow and fixed image of traditional school discipline
-dominates, that one is in any danger of overlooking that deeper and
-infinitely wider discipline that comes from having a part to do in
-constructive work, in contributing to a result which, social in spirit,
-is none the less obvious and tangible in form—and hence in a form with
-reference to which responsibility may be exacted and accurate judgment
-passed.
-
-The great thing to keep in mind, then, regarding the introduction into
-the school of various forms of active occupation, is that through them
-the entire spirit of the school is renewed. It has a chance to affiliate
-itself with life, to become the child’s habitat, where he learns through
-directed living; instead of being only a place to learn lessons having
-an abstract and remote reference to some possible living to be done in
-the future. It gets a chance to be a miniature community, an embryonic
-society. This is the fundamental fact, and from this arise continuous
-and orderly sources of instruction. Under the industrial _régime_
-described, the child, after all, shared in the work, not for the sake of
-the sharing, but for the sake of the product. The educational results
-secured were real, yet incidental and dependent. But in the school the
-typical occupations followed are freed from all economic stress. The aim
-is not the economic value of the products, but the development of social
-power and insight. It is this liberation from narrow utilities, this
-openness to the possibilities of the human spirit that makes these
-practical activities in the school allies of art and centers of science
-and history.
-
-The unity of all the sciences is found in geography. The significance of
-geography is that it presents the earth as the enduring home of the
-occupations of man. The world without its relationship to human activity
-is less than a world. Human industry and achievement, apart from their
-roots in the earth, are not even a sentiment, hardly a name. The earth
-is the final source of all man’s food. It is his continual shelter and
-protection, the raw material of all his activities, and the home to
-whose humanizing and idealizing all his achievement returns. It is the
-great field, the great mine, the great source of the energies of heat,
-light, and electricity; the great scene of ocean, stream, mountain, and
-plain, of which all our agriculture and mining and lumbering, all our
-manufacturing and distributing agencies, are but the partial elements
-and factors. It is through occupations determined by this environment
-that mankind has made its historical and political progress. It is
-through these occupations that the intellectual and emotional
-interpretation of nature has been developed. It is through what we do in
-and with the world that we read its meaning and measure its value.
-
-In educational terms, this means that these occupations in the school
-shall not be mere practical devices or modes of routine employment, the
-gaining of better technical skill as cooks, sempstresses, or carpenters,
-but active centers of scientific insight into natural materials and
-processes, points of departure whence children shall be led out into a
-realization of the historic development of man. The actual significance
-of this can be told better through one illustration taken from actual
-school work than by general discourse.
-
-There is nothing which strikes more oddly upon the average intelligent
-visitor than to see boys as well as girls of ten, twelve, and thirteen
-years of age engaged in sewing and weaving. If we look at this from the
-standpoint of preparation of the boys for sewing on buttons and making
-patches, we get a narrow and utilitarian conception—a basis that hardly
-justifies giving prominence to this sort of work in the school. But if
-we look at it from another side, we find that this work gives the point
-of departure from which the child can trace and follow the progress of
-mankind in history, getting an insight also into the materials used and
-the mechanical principles involved. In connection with these
-occupations, the historic development of man is recapitulated. For
-example, the children are first given the raw material—the flax, the
-cotton plant, the wool as it comes from the back of the sheep (if we
-could take them to the place where the sheep are sheared, so much the
-better). Then a study is made of these materials from the standpoint of
-their adaptation to the uses to which they may be put. For instance, a
-comparison of the cotton fiber with wool fiber is made. I did not know
-until the children told me, that the reason for the late development of
-the cotton industry as compared with the woolen is, that the cotton
-fiber is so very difficult to free by hand from the seeds. The children
-in one group worked thirty minutes freeing cotton fibers from the boll
-and seeds, and succeeded in getting out less than one ounce. They could
-easily believe that one person could only gin one pound a day by hand,
-and could understand why their ancestors wore woolen instead of cotton
-clothing. Among other things discovered as affecting their relative
-utilities, was the shortness of the cotton fiber as compared with that
-of wool, the former being one-tenth of an inch in length, while that of
-the latter is an inch in length; also that the fibers of cotton are
-smooth and do not cling together, while the wool has a certain roughness
-which makes the fibers stick, thus assisting the spinning. The children
-worked this out for themselves with the actual material, aided by
-questions and suggestions from the teacher.
-
-They then followed the processes necessary for working the fibers up
-into cloth. They re-invented the first frame for carding the wool—a
-couple of boards with sharp pins in them for scratching it out. They
-re-devised the simplest process for spinning the wool—a pierced stone or
-some other weight through which the wool is passed, and which as it is
-twirled draws out the fiber; next the top, which was spun on the floor,
-while the children kept the wool in their hands until it was gradually
-drawn out and wound upon it. Then the children are introduced to the
-invention next in historic order, working it out experimentally, thus
-seeing its necessity, and tracing its effects, not only upon that
-particular industry, but upon modes of social life—in this way passing
-in review the entire process up to the present complete loom, and all
-that goes with the application of science in the use of our present
-available powers. I need not speak of the science involved in this—the
-study of the fibers, of geographical features, the conditions under
-which raw materials are grown, the great centers of manufacture and
-distribution, the physics involved in the machinery of production; nor,
-again, of the historical side—the influence which these inventions have
-had upon humanity. You can concentrate the history of all mankind into
-the evolution of the flax, cotton, and wool fibers into clothing. I do
-not mean that this is the only, or the best, center. But it is true that
-certain very real and important avenues to the consideration of the
-history of the race are thus opened—that the mind is introduced to much
-more fundamental and controlling influences than usually appear in the
-political and chronological records that pass for history.
-
-Now, what is true of this one instance of fibers used in fabrics (and,
-of course, I have only spoken of one or two elementary phases of that)
-is true in its measure of every material used in every occupation, and
-of the processes employed. The occupation supplies the child with a
-genuine motive; it gives him experience at first hand; it brings him
-into contact with realities. It does all this, but in addition it is
-liberalized throughout by translation into its historic values and
-scientific equivalencies. With the growth of the child’s mind in power
-and knowledge it ceases to be a pleasant occupation merely, and becomes
-more and more a medium, an instrument, an organ—and is thereby
-transformed.
-
-This, in turn, has its bearing upon the teaching of science. Under
-present conditions, all activity, to be successful, has to be directed
-somewhere and somehow by the scientific expert—it is a case of applied
-science. This connection should determine its place in education. It is
-not only that the occupations, the so-called manual or industrial work
-in the school, give the opportunity for the introduction of science
-which illuminates them, which makes them material, freighted with
-meaning, instead of being mere devices of hand and eye; but that the
-scientific insight thus gained becomes an indispensable instrument of
-free and active participation in modern social life. Plato somewhere
-speaks of the slave as one who in his actions does not express his own
-ideas, but those of some other man. It is our social problem now, even
-more urgent than in the time of Plato, that method, purpose,
-understanding, shall exist in the consciousness of the one who does the
-work, that his activity shall have meaning to himself.
-
-When occupations in the school are conceived in this broad and generous
-way, I can only stand lost in wonder at the objections so often heard,
-that such occupations are out of place in the school because they are
-materialistic, utilitarian, or even menial in their tendency. It
-sometimes seems to me that those who make these objections must live in
-quite another world. The world in which most of us live is a world in
-which everyone has a calling and occupation, something to do. Some are
-managers and others are subordinates. But the great thing for one as for
-the other is that each shall have had the education which enables him to
-see within his daily work all there is in it of large and human
-significance. How many of the employed are today mere appendages to the
-machines which they operate! This may be due in part to the machine
-itself, or to the _régime_ which lays so much stress upon the products
-of the machine; but it is certainly due in large part to the fact that
-the worker has had no opportunity to develop his imagination and his
-sympathetic insight as to the social and scientific values found in his
-work. At present, the impulses which lie at the basis of the industrial
-system are either practically neglected or positively distorted during
-the school period. Until the instincts of construction and production
-are systematically laid hold of in the years of childhood and youth,
-until they are trained in social directions, enriched by historical
-interpretation, controlled and illuminated by scientific methods, we
-certainly are in no position even to locate the source of our economic
-evils, much less to deal with them effectively.
-
-If we go back a few centuries, we find a practical monopoly of learning.
-The term _possession_ of learning was, indeed, a happy one. Learning was
-a class matter. This was a necessary result of social conditions. There
-were not in existence any means by which the multitude could possibly
-have access to intellectual resources. These were stored up and hidden
-away in manuscripts. Of these there were at best only a few, and it
-required long and toilsome preparation to be able to do anything with
-them. A high-priesthood of learning, which guarded the treasury of truth
-and which doled it out to the masses under severe restrictions, was the
-inevitable expression of these conditions. But, as a direct result of
-the industrial revolution of which we have been speaking, this has been
-changed. Printing was invented; it was made commercial. Books,
-magazines, papers were multiplied and cheapened. As a result of the
-locomotive and telegraph, frequent, rapid, and cheap intercommunication
-by mails and electricity was called into being. Travel has been rendered
-easy; freedom of movement, with its accompanying exchange of ideas,
-indefinitely facilitated. The result has been an intellectual
-revolution. Learning has been put into circulation. While there still
-is, and probably always will be, a particular class having the special
-business of inquiry in hand, a distinctively learned class is henceforth
-out of the question. It is an anachronism. Knowledge is no longer an
-immobile solid; it has been liquefied. It is actively moving in all the
-currents of society itself.
-
-It is easy to see that this revolution, as regards the materials of
-knowledge, carries with it a marked change in the attitude of the
-individual. Stimuli of an intellectual sort pour in upon us in all kinds
-of ways. The merely intellectual life, the life of scholarship and of
-learning, thus gets a very altered value. Academic and scholastic,
-instead of being titles of honor, are becoming terms of reproach.
-
-But all this means a necessary change in the attitude of the school, one
-of which we are as yet far from realizing the full force. Our school
-methods, and to a very considerable extent our curriculum, are inherited
-from the period when learning and command of certain symbols, affording
-as they did the only access to learning, were all-important. The ideals
-of this period are still largely in control, even where the outward
-methods and studies have been changed. We sometimes hear the
-introduction of manual training, art and science into the elementary,
-and even the secondary schools, deprecated on the ground that they tend
-toward the production of specialists—that they detract from our present
-scheme of generous, liberal culture. The point of this objection would
-be ludicrous if it were not often so effective as to make it tragic. It
-is our present education which is highly specialized, one-sided and
-narrow. It is an education dominated almost entirely by the mediæval
-conception of learning. It is something which appeals for the most part
-simply to the intellectual aspect of our natures, our desire to learn,
-to accumulate information, and to get control of the symbols of
-learning; not to our impulses and tendencies to make, to do, to create,
-to produce, whether in the form of utility or of art. The very fact that
-manual training, art and science are objected to as technical, as
-tending toward mere specialism, is of itself as good testimony as could
-be offered to the specialized aim which controls current education.
-Unless education had been virtually identified with the exclusively
-intellectual pursuits, with learning as such, all these materials and
-methods would be welcome, would be greeted with the utmost hospitality.
-
-While training for the profession of learning is regarded as the type of
-culture, as a liberal education, that of a mechanic, a musician, a
-lawyer, a doctor, a farmer, a merchant, or a railroad manager is
-regarded as purely technical and professional. The result is that which
-we see about us everywhere—the division into “cultured” people and
-“workers,” the separation of theory and practice. Hardly one per cent.
-of the entire school population ever attains to what we call higher
-education; only five per cent. to the grade of our high school; while
-much more than half leave on or before the completion of the fifth year
-of the elementary grade. The simple facts of the case are that in the
-great majority of human beings the distinctively intellectual interest
-is not dominant. They have the so-called practical impulse and
-disposition. In many of those in whom by nature intellectual interest is
-strong, social conditions prevent its adequate realization. Consequently
-by far the larger number of pupils leave school as soon as they have
-acquired the rudiments of learning, as soon as they have enough of the
-symbols of reading, writing, and calculating to be of practical use to
-them in getting a living. While our educational leaders are talking of
-culture, the development of personality, etc., as the end and aim of
-education, the great majority of those who pass under the tuition of the
-school regard it only as a narrowly practical tool with which to get
-bread and butter enough to eke out a restricted life. If we were to
-conceive our educational end and aim in a less exclusive way, if we were
-to introduce into educational processes the activities which appeal to
-those whose dominant interest is to do and to make, we should find the
-hold of the school upon its members to be more vital, more prolonged,
-containing more of culture.
-
-But why should I make this labored presentation? The obvious fact is
-that our social life has undergone a thorough and radical change. If our
-education is to have any meaning for life, it must pass through an
-equally complete transformation. This transformation is not something to
-appear suddenly, to be executed in a day by conscious purpose. It is
-already in progress. Those modifications of our school system which
-often appear (even to those most actively concerned with them, to say
-nothing of their spectators) to be mere changes of detail, mere
-improvement within the school mechanism, are in reality signs and
-evidences of evolution. The introduction of active occupations, of
-nature study, of elementary science, of art, of history; the relegation
-of the merely symbolic and formal to a secondary position; the change in
-the moral school atmosphere, in the relation of pupils and teachers—of
-discipline; the introduction of more active, expressive, and
-self-directing factors—all these are not mere accidents, they are
-necessities of the larger social evolution. It remains but to organize
-all these factors, to appreciate them in their fullness of meaning, and
-to put the ideas and ideals involved into complete, uncompromising
-possession of our school system. To do this means to make each one of
-our schools an embryonic community life, active with types of
-occupations that reflect the life of the larger society, and permeated
-throughout with the spirit of art, history, and science. When the school
-introduces and trains each child of society into membership within such
-a little community, saturating him with the spirit of service, and
-providing him with the instruments of effective self-direction, we shall
-have the deepest and best guarantee of a larger society which is worthy,
-lovely, and harmonious.
-
-
-
-
- II
- THE SCHOOL AND THE LIFE OF THE CHILD
-
-
-Last week I tried to put before you the relationship between the school
-and the larger life of the community, and the necessity for certain
-changes in the methods and materials of school work, that it might be
-better adapted to present social needs.
-
-Today I wish to look at the matter from the other side, and consider the
-relationship of the school to the life and development of the children
-in the school. As it is difficult to connect general principles with
-such thoroughly concrete things as little children, I have taken the
-liberty of introducing a good deal of illustrative matter from the work
-of the University Elementary School, that in some measure you may
-appreciate the way in which the ideas presented work themselves out in
-actual practice.
-
-Some few years ago I was looking about the school supply stores in the
-city, trying to find desks and chairs which seemed thoroughly suitable
-from all points of view—artistic, hygienic, and educational—to the needs
-of the children. We had a good deal of difficulty in finding what we
-needed, and finally one dealer, more intelligent than the rest, made
-this remark: “I am afraid we have not what you want. You want something
-at which the children may work; these are all for listening.” That tells
-the story of the traditional education. Just as the biologist can take a
-bone or two and reconstruct the whole animal, so, if we put before the
-mind’s eye the ordinary schoolroom, with its rows of ugly desks placed
-in geometrical order, crowded together so that there shall be as little
-moving room as possible, desks almost all of the same size, with just
-space enough to hold books, pencils and paper, and add a table, some
-chairs, the bare walls, and possibly a few pictures, we can reconstruct
-the only educational activity that can possibly go on in such a place.
-It is all made “for listening”—for simply studying lessons out of a book
-is only another kind of listening; it marks the dependency of one mind
-upon another. The attitude of listening means, comparatively speaking,
-passivity, absorption; that there are certain ready-made materials which
-are there, which have been prepared by the school superintendent, the
-board, the teacher, and of which the child is to take in as much as
-possible in the least possible time.
-
-There is very little place in the traditional schoolroom for the child
-to work. The workshop, the laboratory, the materials, the tools with
-which the child may construct, create, and actively inquire, and even
-the requisite space, have been for the most part lacking. The things
-that have to do with these processes have not even a definitely
-recognized place in education. They are what the educational authorities
-who write editorials in the daily papers generally term “fads” and
-“frills.” A lady told me yesterday that she had been visiting different
-schools trying to find one where activity on the part of the children
-preceded the giving of information on the part of the teacher, or where
-the children had some motive for demanding the information. She visited,
-she said, twenty-four different schools before she found her first
-instance. I may add that that was not in this city.
-
-Another thing that is suggested by these schoolrooms, with their set
-desks, is that everything is arranged for handling as large numbers of
-children as possible; for dealing with children _en masse_, as an
-aggregate of units; involving, again, that they be treated passively.
-The moment children act they individualize themselves; they cease to be
-a mass, and become the intensely distinctive beings that we are
-acquainted with out of school, in the home, the family, on the
-playground, and in the neighborhood.
-
-On the same basis is explicable the uniformity of method and curriculum.
-If everything is on a “listening” basis, you can have uniformity of
-material and method. The ear, and the book which reflects the ear,
-constitute the medium which is alike for all. There is next to no
-opportunity for adjustment to varying capacities and demands. There is a
-certain amount—a fixed quantity—of ready-made results and
-accomplishments to be acquired by all children alike in a given time. It
-is in response to this demand that the curriculum has been developed
-from the elementary school up through the college. There is just so much
-desirable knowledge, and there are just so many needed technical
-accomplishments in the world. Then comes the mathematical problem of
-dividing this by the six, twelve, or sixteen years of school life. Now
-give the children every year just the proportionate fraction of the
-total, and by the time they have finished they will have mastered the
-whole. By covering so much ground during this hour or day or week or
-year, everything comes out with perfect evenness at the end—provided the
-children have not forgotten what they have previously learned. The
-outcome of all this is Matthew Arnold’s report of the statement, proudly
-made to him by an educational authority in France, that so many
-thousands of children were studying at a given hour, say eleven o’clock,
-just such a lesson in geography; and in one of our own western cities
-this proud boast used to be repeated to successive visitors by its
-superintendent.
-
-I may have exaggerated somewhat in order to make plain the typical
-points of the old education: its passivity of attitude, its mechanical
-massing of children, its uniformity of curriculum and method. It may be
-summed up by stating that the center of gravity is outside the child. It
-is in the teacher, the text-book, anywhere and everywhere you please
-except in the immediate instincts and activities of the child himself.
-On that basis there is not much to be said about the _life_ of the
-child. A good deal might be said about the studying of the child, but
-the school is not the place where the child _lives_. Now the change
-which is coming into our education is the shifting of the center of
-gravity. It is a change, a revolution, not unlike that introduced by
-Copernicus when the astronomical center shifted from the earth to the
-sun. In this case the child becomes the sun about which the appliances
-of education revolve; he is the center about which they are organized.
-
-If we take an example from an ideal home, where the parent is
-intelligent enough to recognize what is best for the child, and is able
-to supply what is needed, we find the child learning through the social
-converse and constitution of the family. There are certain points of
-interest and value to him in the conversation carried on: statements are
-made, inquiries arise, topics are discussed, and the child continually
-learns. He states his experiences, his misconceptions are corrected.
-Again the child participates in the household occupations, and thereby
-gets habits of industry, order, and regard for the rights and ideas of
-others, and the fundamental habit of subordinating his activities to the
-general interest of the household. Participation in these household
-tasks becomes an opportunity for gaining knowledge. The ideal home would
-naturally have a workshop where the child could work out his
-constructive instincts. It would have a miniature laboratory in which
-his inquiries could be directed. The life of the child would extend out
-of doors to the garden, surrounding fields, and forests. He would have
-his excursions, his walks and talks, in which the larger world out of
-doors would open to him.
-
-Now, if we organize and generalize all of this, we have the ideal
-school. There is no mystery about it, no wonderful discovery of pedagogy
-or educational theory. It is simply a question of doing systematically
-and in a large, intelligent, and competent way what for various reasons
-can be done in most households only in a comparatively meager and
-haphazard manner. In the first place, the ideal home has to be enlarged.
-The child must be brought into contact with more grown people and with
-more children in order that there may be the freest and richest social
-life. Moreover, the occupations and relationships of the home
-environment are not specially selected for the growth of the child; the
-main object is something else, and what the child can get out of them is
-incidental. Hence the need of a school. In this school the life of the
-child becomes the all-controlling aim. All the media necessary to
-further the growth of the child center there. Learning?—certainly, but
-living primarily, and learning through and in relation to this living.
-When we take the life of the child centered and organized in this way,
-we do not find that he is first of all a listening being; quite the
-contrary.
-
-The statement so frequently made that education means “drawing out” is
-excellent, if we mean simply to contrast it with the process of pouring
-in. But, after all, it is difficult to connect the idea of drawing out
-with the ordinary doings of the child of three, four, seven, or eight
-years of age. He is already running over, spilling over, with activities
-of all kinds. He is not a purely latent being whom the adult has to
-approach with great caution and skill in order gradually to draw out
-some hidden germ of activity. The child is already intensely active, and
-the question of education is the question of taking hold of his
-activities, of giving them direction. Through direction, through
-organized use, they tend toward valuable results, instead of scattering
-or being left to merely impulsive expression.
-
-If we keep this before us, the difficulty I find uppermost in the minds
-of many people regarding what is termed the new education is not so much
-solved as dissolved; it disappears. A question often asked is: if you
-begin with the child’s ideas, impulses and interests, all so crude, so
-random and scattering, so little refined or spiritualized, how is he
-going to get the necessary discipline, culture and information? If there
-were no way open to us except to excite and indulge these impulses of
-the child, the question might well be asked. We should either have to
-ignore and repress the activities, or else to humor them. But if we have
-organization of equipment and of materials, there is another path open
-to us. We can direct the child’s activities, giving them exercise along
-certain lines, and can thus lead up to the goal which logically stands
-at the end of the paths followed.
-
-“If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.” Since they are not, since
-really to satisfy an impulse or interest means to work it out, and
-working it out involves running up against obstacles, becoming
-acquainted with materials, exercising ingenuity, patience, persistence,
-alertness, it of necessity involves discipline—ordering of power—and
-supplies knowledge. Take the example of the little child who wants to
-make a box. If he stops short with the imagination or wish, he certainly
-will not get discipline. But when he attempts to realize his impulse, it
-is a question of making his idea definite, making it into a plan, of
-taking the right kind of wood, measuring the parts needed, giving them
-the necessary proportions, etc. There is involved the preparation of
-materials, the sawing, planing, the sand-papering, making all the edges
-and corners to fit. Knowledge of tools and processes is inevitable. If
-the child realizes his instinct and makes the box, there is plenty of
-opportunity to gain discipline and perseverance, to exercise effort in
-overcoming obstacles, and to attain as well a great deal of information.
-
-So undoubtedly the little child who thinks he would like to cook has
-little idea of what it means or costs, or what it requires. It is simply
-a desire to “mess around,” perhaps to imitate the activities of older
-people. And it is doubtless possible to let ourselves down to that level
-and simply humor that interest. But here, too, if the impulse is
-exercised, utilized, it runs up against the actual world of hard
-conditions, to which it must accommodate itself; and there again come in
-the factors of discipline and knowledge. One of the children became
-impatient recently, at having to work things out by a long method of
-experimentation, and said: “Why do we bother with this? Let’s follow a
-recipe in a cook-book.” The teacher asked the children where the recipe
-came from, and the conversation showed that if they simply followed this
-they would not understand the reasons for what they were doing. They
-were then quite willing to go on with the experimental work. To follow
-that work will, indeed, give an illustration of just the point in
-question. Their occupation happened that day to be the cooking of eggs,
-as making a transition from the cooking of vegetables to that of meats.
-In order to get a basis of comparison they first summarized the
-constituent food elements in the vegetables and made a preliminary
-comparison with those found in meat. Thus they found that the woody
-fiber or cellulose in vegetables corresponded to the connective tissue
-in meat, giving the element of form and structure. They found that
-starch and starchy products were characteristic of the vegetables, that
-mineral salts were found in both alike, and that there was fat in both—a
-small quantity in vegetable food and a large amount in animal. They were
-prepared then to take up the study of albumen as the characteristic
-feature of animal food, corresponding to starch in the vegetables, and
-were ready to consider the conditions requisite for the proper treatment
-of albumen—the eggs serving as the material of experiment.
-
-[Illustration: CHILD’S DRAWING OF A CAVE AND TREES]
-
-They experimented first by taking water at various temperatures, finding
-out when it was scalding, simmering, and boiling hot, and ascertained
-the effect of the various degrees of temperature on the white of the
-egg. That worked out, they were prepared, not simply to cook eggs, but
-to understand the principle involved in the cooking of eggs. I do not
-wish to lose sight of the universal in the particular incident. For the
-child simply to desire to cook an egg, and accordingly drop it in water
-for three minutes, and take it out when he is told, is not educative.
-But for the child to realize his own impulse by recognizing the facts,
-materials and conditions involved, and then to regulate his impulse
-through that recognition, is educative. This is the difference, upon
-which I wish to insist, between exciting or indulging an interest and
-realizing it through its direction.
-
-Another instinct of the child is the use of pencil and paper. All
-children like to express themselves through the medium of form and
-color. If you simply indulge this interest by letting the child go on
-indefinitely, there is no growth that is more than accidental. But let
-the child first express his impulse, and then through criticism,
-question, and suggestion bring him to consciousness of what he has done,
-and what he needs to do, and the result is quite different. Here, for
-example, is the work of a seven-year-old child. It is not average work,
-it is the best work done among the little children, but it illustrates
-the particular principle of which I have been speaking. They had been
-talking about the primitive conditions of social life when people lived
-in caves. The child’s idea of that found expression in this way: the
-cave is neatly set up on the hill side in an impossible way. You see the
-conventional tree of childhood; a vertical line with horizontal branches
-on each side. If the child had been allowed to go on repeating this sort
-of thing day by day, he would be indulging his instinct rather than
-exercising it. But the child was now asked to look closely at trees, to
-compare those seen with the one drawn, to examine more closely and
-consciously into the conditions of his work. Then he drew trees from
-observation.
-
-Finally he drew again from combined observation, memory, and
-imagination. He made again a free illustration, expressing his own
-imaginative thought, but controlled by detailed study of actual trees.
-The result was a scene representing a bit of forest; so far as it goes,
-it seems to me to have as much poetic feeling as the work of an adult,
-while at the same time its trees are, in their proportions possible
-ones, not mere symbols.
-
-[Illustration: CHILD’S DRAWING OF A FOREST]
-
-If we roughly classify the impulses which are available in the school,
-we may group them under four heads. There is the social instinct of the
-children as shown in conversation, personal intercourse, and
-communication. We all know how self-centered the little child is at the
-age of four or five. If any new subject is brought up, if he says
-anything at all, it is: “I have seen that;” or, “My papa or mamma told
-me about that.” His horizon is not large; an experience must come
-immediately home to him, if he is to be sufficiently interested to
-relate it to others and seek theirs in return. And yet the egoistic and
-limited interest of little children is in this manner capable of
-infinite expansion. The language instinct is the simplest form of the
-social expression of the child. Hence it is a great, perhaps the
-greatest of all educational resources.
-
-Then there is the instinct of making—the constructive impulse. The
-child’s impulse to do finds expression first in play, in movement,
-gesture, and make-believe, becomes more definite, and seeks outlet in
-shaping materials into tangible forms and permanent embodiment. The
-child has not much instinct for abstract inquiry. The instinct of
-investigation seems to grow out of the combination of the constructive
-impulse with the conversational. There is no distinction between
-experimental science for little children and the work done in the
-carpenter shop. Such work as they can do in physics or chemistry is not
-for the purpose of making technical generalizations or even arriving at
-abstract truths. Children simply like to do things, and watch to see
-what will happen. But this can be taken advantage of, can be directed
-into ways where it gives results of value, as well as be allowed to go
-on at random.
-
-And so the expressive impulse of the children, the art instinct, grows
-also out of the communicating and constructive instincts. It is their
-refinement and full manifestation. Make the construction adequate, make
-it full, free, and flexible, give it a social motive, something to tell,
-and you have a work of art. Take one illustration of this in connection
-with the textile work—sewing and weaving. The children made a primitive
-loom in the shop; here the constructive instinct was appealed to. Then
-they wished to do something with this loom, to make something. It was
-the type of the Indian loom, and they were shown blankets woven by the
-Indians. Each child made a design kindred in idea to those of the Navajo
-blankets, and the one which seemed best adapted to the work in hand was
-selected. The technical resources were limited, but the coloring and
-form were worked out by the children. The example shown was made by the
-twelve-year-old children. Examination shows that it took patience,
-thoroughness, and perseverance to do the work. It involved not merely
-discipline and information of both a historical sort and the elements of
-technical design, but also something of the spirit of art in adequately
-conveying an idea.
-
-[Illustration: CHILD’S DRAWING OF HANDS SPINNING]
-
-One more instance of the connection of the art side with the
-constructive side. The children had been studying primitive spinning and
-carding, when one of them, twelve years of age, made a picture of one of
-the older children spinning. Here is another piece of work which is not
-quite average; it is better than the average. It is an illustration of
-two hands and the drawing out of the wool to get it ready for spinning.
-This was done by a child eleven years of age. But, upon the whole, with
-the younger children especially, the art impulse is connected mainly
-with the social instinct—the desire to tell, to represent.
-
-[Illustration: CHILD’S DRAWING OF A GIRL SPINNING]
-
-Now, keeping in mind these fourfold interests—the interest in
-conversation or communication; in inquiry, or finding out things; in
-making things, or construction; and in artistic expression—we may say
-they are the natural resources, the uninvested capital, upon the
-exercise of which depends the active growth of the child. I wish to give
-one or two illustrations, the first from the work of children seven
-years of age. It illustrates in a way the dominant desire of the
-children to talk, particularly about folks and of things in relation to
-folks. If you observe little children, you will find they are interested
-in the world of things mainly in its connection with people, as a
-background and medium of human concerns. Many anthropologists have told
-us there are certain identities in the child interests with those of
-primitive life. There is a sort or natural recurrence of the child mind
-to the typical activities of primitive peoples; witness the hut which
-the boy likes to build in the yard, playing hunt, with bows, arrows,
-spears, and so on. Again the question comes: What are we to do with this
-interest—are we to ignore it, or just excite and draw it out? Or shall
-we get hold of it and direct it to something ahead, something better?
-Some of the work that has been planned for our seven-year-old children
-has the latter end in view—to utilize this interest so that it shall
-become a means of seeing the progress of the human race. The children
-begin by imagining present conditions taken away until they are in
-contact with nature at first hand. That takes them back to a hunting
-people, to a people living in caves or trees and getting a precarious
-subsistence by hunting and fishing. They imagine as far as possible the
-various natural physical conditions adapted to that sort of life; say, a
-hilly, woody slope, near mountains and a river where fish would be
-abundant. Then they go on in imagination through the hunting to the
-semi-agricultural stage, and through the nomadic to the settled
-agricultural stage. The point I wish to make is that there is abundant
-opportunity thus given for actual study, for inquiry which results in
-gaining information. So, while the instinct primarily appeals to the
-social side, the interest of the child in people and their doings is
-carried on into the larger world of reality. For example, the children
-had some idea of primitive weapons, of the stone arrowhead, etc. That
-provided occasion for the testing of materials as regards their
-friability, their shape, texture, etc., resulting in a lesson in
-mineralogy, as they examined the different stones to find which was best
-suited to the purpose. The discussion of the iron age supplied a demand
-for the construction of a smelting oven made out of clay, and of
-considerable size. As the children did not get their drafts right at
-first, the mouth of the furnace not being in proper relation to the
-vent, as to size and position, instruction in the principles of
-combustion, the nature of drafts and of fuel, was required. Yet the
-instruction was not given ready-made; it was first needed, and then
-arrived at experimentally. Then the children took some material, such as
-copper, and went through a series of experiments, fusing it, working it
-into objects; and the same experiments were made with lead and other
-metals. This work has been also a continuous course in geography, since
-the children have had to imagine and work out the various physical
-conditions necessary to the different forms of social life implied. What
-would be the physical conditions appropriate to pastoral life? to the
-beginning of agriculture? to fishing? What would be the natural method
-of exchange between these peoples? Having worked out such points in
-conversation, they have afterward represented them in maps and
-sand-molding. Thus they have gained ideas of the various forms of the
-configuration of the earth, and at the same time have seen them in their
-relation to human activity, so that they are not simply external facts,
-but are fused and welded with social conceptions regarding the life and
-progress of humanity. The result, to my mind, justifies completely the
-conviction that children, in a year of such work (of five hours a week
-altogether), get indefinitely more acquaintance with facts of science,
-geography, and anthropology than they get where information is the
-professed end and object, where they are simply set to learning facts in
-fixed lessons. As to discipline, they get more training of attention,
-more power of interpretation, of drawing inferences, of acute
-observation and continuous reflection, than if they were put to working
-out arbitrary problems simply for the sake of discipline.
-
-I should like at this point to refer to the recitation. We all know what
-it has been—a placer where the child shows off to the teacher and the
-other children the amount of information he has succeeded in
-assimilating from the text-book. From this other standpoint, the
-recitation becomes preëminently a social meeting place; it is to the
-school what the spontaneous conversation is at home, excepting that it
-is more organized, following definite lines. The recitation becomes the
-social clearing-house, where experiences and ideas are exchanged and
-subjected to criticism, where misconceptions are corrected, and new
-lines of thought and inquiry are set up.
-
-This change of the recitation from an examination of knowledge already
-acquired to the free play of the children’s communicative instinct,
-affects and modifies all the language work of the school. Under the old
-_régime_ it was unquestionably a most serious problem to give the
-children a full and free use of language. The reason was obvious. The
-natural motive for language was seldom offered. In the pedagogical
-text-books language is defined as the medium of expressing thought. It
-becomes that, more or less, to adults with trained minds, but it hardly
-needs to be said that language is primarily a social thing, a means by
-which we give our experiences to others and get theirs again in return.
-When it is taken from its natural basis, it is no wonder that it becomes
-a complex and difficult problem to teach language. Think of the
-absurdity of having to teach language as a thing by itself. If there is
-anything the child will do before he goes to school, it is to talk of
-the things that interest him. But when there are no vital interests
-appealed to in the school, when language is used simply for the
-repetition of lessons, it is not surprising that one of the chief
-difficulties of school work has come to be instruction in the
-mother-tongue. Since the language taught is unnatural, not growing out
-of the real desire to communicate vital impressions and convictions, the
-freedom of children in its use gradually disappears, until finally the
-high-school teacher has to invent all kinds of devices to assist in
-getting any spontaneous and full use of speech. Moreover, when the
-language instinct is appealed to in a social way, there is a continual
-contact with reality. The result is that the child always has something
-in his mind to talk about, he has something to say; he has a thought to
-express, and a thought is not a thought unless it is one’s own. On the
-traditional method, the child must say something that he has merely
-learned. There is all the difference in the world between having
-something to say and having to say something. The child who has a
-variety of materials and facts wants to talk about them, and his
-language becomes more refined and full, because it is controlled and
-informed by realities. Reading and writing, as well as the oral use of
-language, may be taught on this basis. It can be done in a _related_
-way, as the outgrowth of the child’s social desire to recount his
-experiences and get in return the experiences of others, directed always
-through contact with the facts and forces which determine the truth
-communicated.
-
-I shall not have time to speak of the work of the older children, where
-the original crude instincts of construction and communication have been
-developed into something like scientifically directed inquiry, but I
-will give an illustration of the use of language following upon this
-experimental work. The work was on the basis of a simple experiment of
-the commonest sort, gradually leading the children out into geological
-and geographical study. The sentences that I am going to read seem to me
-poetic as well as “scientific.” “A long time ago when the earth was new,
-when it was lava, there was no water on the earth, and there was steam
-all round the earth up in the air, as there were many gases in the air.
-One of them was carbon dioxide. The steam became clouds, because the
-earth began to cool off, and after a while it began to rain, and the
-water came down and dissolved the carbon dioxide from the air.” There is
-a good deal more science in that than probably would be apparent at the
-outset. It represents some three months of work on the part of the
-child. The children kept daily and weekly records, but this is part of
-the summing up of the quarter’s work. I call this language poetic,
-because the child has a clear image and has a personal feeling for the
-realities imaged. I extract sentences from two other records to
-illustrate further the vivid use of language when there is a vivid
-experience back of it. “When the earth was cold enough to condense, the
-water, with the help of carbon dioxide, _pulls_ the calcium out of the
-rocks into a large body of water where the little animals could get it.”
-The other reads as follows: “When the earth cooled, calcium was in the
-rocks. Then the carbon dioxide and water united and formed a solution,
-and, as it ran, it _tore_ out the calcium and carried it on to the sea,
-where there were little animals who took it out of solution.” The use of
-such words as “pulled” and “tore” in connection with the process of
-chemical combination evidences a personal realization which compels its
-own appropriate expression.
-
-If I had not taken so much time in my other illustrations, I should like
-to show how, beginning with very simple material things, the children
-were led on to larger fields of investigation, and to the intellectual
-discipline that is the accompaniment of such research. I will simply
-mention the experiment in which the work began. It consisted in making
-precipitated chalk, used for polishing metals. The children, with simple
-apparatus—a tumbler, lime water, and a glass tube—precipitated the
-calcium carbonate out of the water; and from this beginning went on to a
-study of the processes by which rocks of various sorts, igneous,
-sedimentary, etc., had been formed on the surface of the earth and the
-places they occupy; then to points in the geography of the United
-States, Hawaii, and Puerto Rico; to the effects of these various bodies
-of rock, in their various configurations, upon the human occupations; so
-that this geological record finally rounded itself out into the life of
-man at the present time. The children saw and felt the connection
-between these geologic processes taking place ages and ages ago, and the
-physical conditions determining the industrial occupations of today.
-
-Of all the possibilities involved in the subject, “The School and the
-Life of the Child,” I have selected but one, because I have found that
-that one gives people more difficulty, is more of a stumbling-block,
-than any other. One may be ready to admit that it would be most
-desirable for the school to be a place in which the child should really
-live, and get a life-experience in which he should delight and find
-meaning for its own sake. But then we hear this inquiry: how, upon this
-basis, shall the child get the needed information; how shall he undergo
-the required discipline? Yes, it has come to this, that with many, if
-not most, people the normal processes of life appear to be incompatible
-with getting information and discipline. So I have tried to indicate, in
-a highly general and inadequate way (for only the school itself, in its
-daily operation, could give a detailed and worthy representation), how
-the problem works itself out—how it is possible to lay hold upon the
-rudimentary instincts of human nature, and, by supplying a proper
-medium, so control their expression as not only to facilitate and enrich
-the growth of the individual child, but also to supply the results, and
-far more, of technical information and discipline that have been the
-ideals of education in the past.
-
-But although I have selected this especial way of approach (as a
-concession to the question almost universally raised), I am not willing
-to leave the matter in this more or less negative and explanatory
-condition. Life is the great thing after all; the life of the child at
-its time and in its measure, no less than the life of the adult. Strange
-would it be, indeed, if intelligent and serious attention to what the
-child _now_ needs and is capable of in the way of a rich, valuable, and
-expanded life should somehow conflict with the needs and possibilities
-of later, adult life. “Let us live with our children,” certainly means,
-first of all, that our children shall live—not that they shall be
-hampered and stunted by being forced into all kinds of conditions, the
-most remote consideration of which is relevancy to the present life of
-the child. If we seek the kingdom of heaven, educationally, all other
-things shall be added unto us—which, being interpreted, is that if we
-identify ourselves with the real instincts and needs of childhood, and
-ask only after its fullest assertion and growth, the discipline and
-information and culture of adult life shall all come in their due
-season.
-
-Speaking of culture reminds me that in a way I have been speaking only
-of the outside of the child’s activity—only of the outward expression of
-his impulses toward saying, making, finding out, and creating. The real
-child, it hardly need be said, lives in the world of imaginative values,
-and ideas which find only imperfect outward embodiment. We hear much
-nowadays about the cultivation of the child’s “imagination.” Then we
-undo much of our own talk and work by a belief that the imagination is
-some special part of the child, that finds its satisfaction in some one
-particular direction—generally speaking, that of the unreal and
-make-believe, of the myth and made-up story. Why are we so hard of heart
-and so slow to believe? The imagination is the medium in which the child
-lives. To him there is everywhere and in everything that occupies his
-mind and activity at all, a surplusage of value and significance. The
-question of the relation of the school to the child’s life is at bottom
-simply this: shall we ignore this native setting and tendency, dealing
-not with the living child at all, but with the dead image we have
-erected, or shall we give it play and satisfaction? If we once believe
-in life and in the life of the child, then will all the occupations and
-uses spoken of, then will all history and science, become instruments of
-appeal and materials of culture to his imagination, and through that to
-the richness and the orderliness of his life. Where we now see only the
-outward doing and the outward product, there, behind all visible
-results, is the re-adjustment of mental attitude, the enlarged and
-sympathetic vision, the sense of growing power, and the willing ability
-to identify both insight and capacity with the interests of the world
-and man. Unless culture be a superficial polish, a veneering of mahogany
-over common wood, it surely is this—the growth of the imagination in
-flexibility, in scope, and in sympathy, till the life which the
-individual lives is informed with the life of nature and of society.
-When nature and society can live in the schoolroom, when the forms and
-tools of learning are subordinated to the substance of experience, then
-shall there be an opportunity for this identification, and culture shall
-be the democratic password.
-
-
-
-
- III
- WASTE IN EDUCATION
-
-
-The subject announced for today was “Waste in Education.” I should like
-first to state briefly its relation to the two preceding lectures. The
-first dealt with the school in its social aspects, and the necessary
-re-adjustments that have to be made to render it effective in present
-social conditions. The second dealt with the school in relation to the
-growth of individual children. Now the third deals with the school as
-itself an institution, both in relation to society and to its own
-members—the children. It deals with the question of organization,
-because all waste is the result of the lack of it, the motive lying
-behind organization being promotion of economy and efficiency. This
-question is not one of the waste of money or the waste of things. These
-matters count; but the primary waste is that of human life, the life of
-the children while they are at school, and afterward because of
-inadequate and perverted preparation.
-
-So, when we speak of organization, we are not to think simply of the
-externals; of that which goes by the name “school system”—the school
-board, the superintendent, and the building, the engaging and promotion
-of teachers, etc. These things enter in, but the fundamental
-organization is that of the school itself as a community of individuals,
-in its relations to other forms of social life. All waste is due to
-isolation. Organization is nothing but getting things into connection
-with one another, so that they work easily, flexibly, and fully.
-Therefore in speaking of this question of waste in education, I desire
-to call your attention to the isolation of the various parts of the
-school system, to the lack of unity in the aims of education, to the
-lack of coherence in its studies and methods.
-
-I have made a chart (I) which, while I speak of the isolations of the
-school system itself, may perhaps appeal to the eye and save a little
-time in verbal explanations. A paradoxical friend of mine says there is
-nothing so obscure as an illustration, and it is quite possible that my
-attempt to illustrate my point will simply prove the truth of his
-statement.
-
-The blocks represent the various elements in the school system, and are
-intended to indicate roughly the length of time given to each division,
-and also the overlapping, both in time and subjects studied, of the
-individual parts of the system. With each block is given the historical
-conditions in which it arose and its ruling ideal.
-
-[Illustration: Chart I]
-
- Professional Schools
- +---+---+---+---+---+---+
- |///|///|///|///|///| |
- |///|///|///|///|///| |
- +---+---+---+---+---+---+
- Mediæval The 19^{th} Century
- _Culture_ _Utility_
-
- High School
- Kindergarten Primary- or Academy
- +---+--+--+ +--+--+---+---+---+ +---+---+---+---+
- | | |//| |//| | | |///| |///| | |///|
- | | |//| |//| | | |///| |///| | |///|
- +---+--+--+ +--+--+---+---+---+ +---+---+---+---+
- 18^{th} Century 16^{th} Century Renaissance
- _Moral_ _Utility_ _Culture_
- _Discipline_
-
- University- College
- Graduate-------Schools
- +---+---+---+---+---+---+
- |///|///| | | | |
- |///|///| | | | |
- +---+---+---+---+---+---+
- Mediæval
- _Culture_
- _Discipline_
-
- Connecting Grammar or
- Class Intermediate School Normal
- +----+ +---+---+---+---+-- +---+---+---+---+
- |////| |///| | |///| |///| |///|///|
- |////| |///| | |///| |///| |///|///|
- +----+ +---+---+---+---+-- +---+---+---+---+
- 19^{th} Century Renaissance 19th Century
- _Culture_ _Utility_
- _Discipline_ _Culture_
-
- Technical Schools
- +---+---+---+---+---+
- | | | | | |
- | | | | | |
- +---+---+---+---+---+
- 19^{th} Century
- _Utility_
-
-The school system, upon the whole, has grown from the top down. During
-the middle ages it was essentially a cluster of professional
-schools—especially law and theology. Our present university comes down
-to us from the middle ages. I will not say that at present it is a
-mediæval institution, but it had its roots in the middle ages, and it
-has not outlived all mediæval traditions regarding learning.
-
-The kindergarten, rising with the present century, was a union of the
-nursery and of the philosophy of Schelling; a wedding of the plays and
-games which the mother carried on with her children, to Schelling’s
-highly romantic and symbolic philosophy. The elements that came from the
-actual study of child life—the continuation of the nursery—have remained
-a life-bringing force in all education; the Schellingesque factors made
-an obstruction between it and the rest of the school system, brought
-about isolations.
-
-The line drawn over the top indicates that there is a certain
-interaction between the kindergarten and the primary school; for, so far
-as the primary school remained in spirit foreign to the natural
-interests of child life, it was isolated from the kindergarten, so that
-it is a problem, at present, to introduce kindergarten methods into the
-primary school; the problem of the so-called connecting class. The
-difficulty is that the two are not one from the start. To get a
-connection the teacher has had to climb over the wall instead of
-entering in at the gate.
-
-On the side of aims, the ideal of the kindergarten was the moral
-development of the children, rather than instruction or discipline; an
-ideal sometimes emphasized to the point of sentimentality. The primary
-school grew practically out of the popular movement of the sixteenth
-century, when along with the invention of printing and the growth of
-commerce, it became a business necessity to know how to read, write, and
-figure. The aim was distinctly a practical one; it was utility; getting
-command of these tools, the symbols of learning, not for the sake of
-learning, but because they gave access to careers in life otherwise
-closed.
-
-The division next to the primary school is the grammar school. The term
-is not much used in the West, but is common in the eastern states. It
-goes back to the time of the revival of learning—a little earlier
-perhaps than the conditions out of which the primary school originated,
-and, even when contemporaneous, having a different ideal. It had to do
-with the study of language in the higher sense; because, at the time of
-the Renaissance, Latin and Greek connected people with the culture of
-the past, with the Roman and Greek world. The classic languages were the
-only means of escape from the limitations of the middle ages. Thus there
-sprang up the prototype of the grammar school, more liberal than the
-university (so largely professional in character), for the purpose of
-putting into the hands of the people the key to the old learning, that
-men might see a world with a larger horizon. The object was primarily
-culture, secondarily discipline. It represented much more than the
-present grammar school. It was the liberal element in the college,
-which, extending downward, grew into the academy and the high school.
-Thus the secondary school is still in part just a lower college (having
-an even higher curriculum than the college of a few centuries ago) or a
-preparatory department to a college, and in part a rounding up of the
-utilities of the elementary school.
-
-There appear then two products of the nineteenth century, the technical
-and normal schools. The schools of technology, engineering, etc., are,
-of course, mainly the development of nineteenth-century business
-conditions, as the primary school was the development of business
-conditions of the sixteenth century. The normal school arose because of
-the necessity for training teachers, with the idea partly of
-professional drill, and partly that of culture.
-
-Without going into more detail, we have some eight different parts of
-the school system as represented on the chart, all of which arose
-historically at different times, having different ideals in view, and
-consequently different methods. I do not wish to suggest that all of the
-isolation, all of the separation, that has existed in the past between
-the different parts of the school system still persists. One must,
-however, recognize that they have never yet been welded into one
-complete whole. The great problem in education on the administrative
-side is how to unite these different parts.
-
-Consider the training schools for teachers—the normal schools. These
-occupy at present a somewhat anomalous position, intermediate between
-the high school and the college, requiring the high-school preparation,
-and covering a certain amount of college work. They are isolated from
-the higher subject-matter of scholarship, since, upon the whole, their
-object has been to train persons _how_ to teach, rather than _what_ to
-teach; while, if we go to the college, we find the other half of this
-isolation—learning _what_ to teach, with almost a contempt for methods
-of teaching. The college is shut off from contact with children and
-youth. Its members, to a great extent, away from home and forgetting
-their own childhood, become eventually teachers with a large amount of
-subject-matter at command, and little knowledge of how this is related
-to the minds of those to whom it is to be taught. In this division
-between what to teach and how to teach, each side suffers from the
-separation.
-
-It is interesting to follow out the inter-relation between primary,
-grammar, and high schools. The elementary school has crowded up and
-taken many subjects previously studied in the old New England grammar
-school. The high school has pushed its subjects down. Latin and algebra
-have been put in the upper grades, so that the seventh and eighth grades
-are, after all, about all that is left of the old grammar school. They
-are a sort of amorphous composite, being partly a place where children
-go on learning what they already have learned (to read, write, and
-figure), and partly a place of preparation for the high school. The name
-in some parts of New England for these upper grades was “Intermediate
-School.” The term was a happy one; the work was simply intermediate
-between something that had been and something that was going to be,
-having no special meaning on its own account.
-
-Just as the parts are separated, so do the ideals differ—moral
-development, practical utility, general culture, discipline, and
-professional training. These aims are each especially represented in
-some distinct part of the system of education; and with the growing
-interaction of the parts, each is supposed to afford a certain amount of
-culture, discipline, and utility. But the lack of fundamental unity is
-witnessed in the fact that one study is still considered good for
-discipline, and another for culture; some parts of arithmetic, for
-example, for discipline and others for use, literature for culture,
-grammar for discipline, geography partly for utility, partly for
-culture; and so on. The unity of education is dissipated, and the
-studies become centrifugal; so much of this study to secure this end, so
-much of that to secure another, until the whole becomes a sheer
-compromise and patchwork between contending aims and disparate studies.
-The great problem in education on the administrative side is to secure
-the unity of the whole, in the place of a sequence of more or less
-unrelated and overlapping parts and thus to reduce the waste arising
-from friction, reduplication and transitions that are not properly
-bridged.
-
-[Illustration: Chart II]
-
- Business
- | 3. ^
- | |
- v |
- +------------------+
- | |
- | |
- Technical | |
- Research ---> | |
- | |
- | | --->
- 4. University | School | 1. Home
- | A | <---
- | |
- Professional <--- | |
- Schools Teachers | |
- | |
- | |
- +------------------+
- ^ |
- | |
- | v
- { Garden
- 2. { Park
- { Country
-
-In this second symbolic diagram (II) I wish to suggest that really the
-only way to unite the parts of the system is to unite each to life. We
-can get only an artificial unity so long as we confine our gaze to the
-school system itself. We must look at it as part of the larger whole of
-social life. This block (A) in the center represents the school system
-as a whole. (1) At one side we have the home, and the two arrows
-represent the free interplay of influences, materials, and ideas between
-the home life and that of the school. (2) Below we have the relation to
-the natural environment, the great field of geography in the widest
-sense. The school building has about it a natural environment. It ought
-to be in a garden, and the children from the garden would be led on to
-surrounding fields, and then into the wider country, with all its facts
-and forces. (3) Above is represented business life, and the necessity
-for free play between the school and the needs and forces of industry.
-(4) On the other side is the university proper, with its various phases,
-its laboratories, its resources in the way of libraries, museums, and
-professional schools.
-
-From the standpoint of the child, the great waste in the school comes
-from his inability to utilize the experiences he gets outside the school
-in any complete and free way within the school itself; while, on the
-other hand, he is unable to apply in daily life what he is learning at
-school. That is the isolation of the school—its isolation from life.
-When the child gets into the schoolroom he has to put out of his mind a
-large part of the ideas, interests, and activities that predominate in
-his home and neighborhood. So the school, being unable to utilize this
-everyday experience, sets painfully to work, on another tack and by a
-variety of means, to arouse in the child an interest in school studies.
-While I was visiting in the city of Moline a few years ago, the
-superintendent told me that they found many children every year, who
-were surprised to learn that the Mississippi river in the text-book had
-anything to do with the stream of water flowing past their homes. The
-geography being simply a matter of the schoolroom, it is more or less of
-an awakening to many children to find that the whole thing is nothing
-but a more formal and definite statement of the facts which they see,
-feel, and touch every day. When we think that we all live on the earth,
-that we live in an atmosphere, that our lives are touched at every point
-by the influences of the soil, flora, and fauna, by considerations of
-light and heat, and then think of what the school study of geography has
-been, we have a typical idea of the gap existing between the everyday
-experiences of the child, and the isolated material supplied in such
-large measure in the school. This is but an instance, and one upon which
-most of us may reflect long before we take the present artificiality of
-the school as other than a matter of course or necessity.
-
-Though there should be organic connection between the school and
-business life, it is not meant that the school is to prepare the child
-for any particular business, but that there should be a natural
-connection of the everyday life of the child with the business
-environment about him, and that it is the affair of the school to
-clarify and liberalize this connection, to bring it to consciousness,
-not by introducing special studies, like commercial geography and
-arithmetic, but by keeping alive the ordinary bonds of relation. The
-subject of compound-business-partnership is probably not in many of the
-arithmetics nowadays, though it was there not a generation ago, for the
-makers of text-books said that if they left out anything they could not
-sell their books. This compound-business-partnership originated as far
-back as the sixteenth century. The joint-stock company had not been
-invented, and as large commerce with the Indies and Americas grew up, it
-was necessary to have an accumulation of capital with which to handle
-it. One man said, “I will put in this amount of money for six months,”
-and another, “So much for two years,” and so on. Thus by joining
-together they got money enough to float their commercial enterprises.
-Naturally, then, “compound partnership” was taught in the schools. The
-joint-stock company was invented; compound partnership disappeared, but
-the problems relating to it stayed in the arithmetics for two hundred
-years. They were kept after they had ceased to have practical utility,
-for the sake of mental discipline—they were “such hard problems, you
-know.” A great deal of what is now in the arithmetics under the head of
-percentage is of the same nature. Children of twelve and thirteen years
-of age go through gain and loss calculations, and various forms of bank
-discount so complicated that the bankers long ago dispensed with them.
-And when it is pointed out that business is not done this way, we hear
-again of “mental discipline.” And yet there are plenty of real
-connections between the experience of children and business conditions
-which need to be utilized and illuminated. The child should study his
-commercial arithmetic and geography, not as isolated things by
-themselves, but in their reference to his social environment. The youth
-needs to become acquainted with the bank as a factor in modern life,
-with what it does, and how it does it; and then relevant arithmetical
-processes would have some meaning—quite in contradistinction to the
-time-absorbing and mind-killing examples in percentage, partial
-payments, etc., found in all our arithmetics.
-
-The connection with the university, as indicated in this chart, I need
-not dwell upon. I simply wish to indicate that there ought to be a free
-interaction between all the parts of the school system. There is much of
-utter triviality of subject-matter in elementary and secondary
-education. When we investigate it, we find that it is full of facts
-taught that are not facts, which have to be unlearned later on. Now,
-this happens because the “lower” parts of our system are not in vital
-connection with the “higher.” The university or college, in its idea, is
-a place of research, where investigation is going on, a place of
-libraries and museums, where the best resources of the past are
-gathered, maintained and organized. It is, however, as true in the
-school as in the university that the spirit of inquiry can be got only
-through and with the attitude of inquiry. The pupil must learn what has
-meaning, what enlarges his horizon, instead of mere trivialities. He
-must become acquainted with truths, instead of things that were regarded
-as such fifty years ago, or that are taken as interesting by the
-misunderstanding of a partially educated teacher. It is difficult to see
-how these ends can be reached except as the most advanced part of the
-educational system is in complete interaction with the most rudimentary.
-
-The next chart (III) is an enlargement of the second. The school
-building has swelled out, so to speak, the surrounding environment
-remaining the same, the home, the garden and country, the relation to
-business life and the university. The object is to show what the school
-must become to get out of its isolation and secure the organic
-connection with social life of which we have been speaking. It is not
-our architect’s plan for the school building that we hope to have; but
-it is a diagrammatic representation of the idea which we want embodied
-in the school building. On the lower side you see the dining-room and
-the kitchen, at the top the wood and metal shops, and the textile room
-for sewing and weaving. The center represents the manner in which all
-come together in the library; that is to say, in a collection of the
-intellectual resources of all kinds that throw light upon the practical
-work, that give it meaning and liberal value. If the four corners
-represent practice, the interior represents the theory of the practical
-activities. In other words, the object of these forms of practice in the
-school is not found chiefly in themselves, or in the technical skill of
-cooks, seamstresses, carpenters and masons, but in their connection, on
-the social side, with the life without; while on the individual side
-they respond to the child’s need of action, of expression, of desire to
-do something, to be constructive and creative, instead of simply passive
-and conforming. Their great significance is that they keep the balance
-between the social and individual sides—the chart symbolizing
-particularly the connection with the social. Here on one side is the
-home. How naturally the lines of connection play back and forth between
-the home and the kitchen and the textile room of the school! The child
-can carry over what he learns in the home and utilize it in the school;
-and the things learned in the school he applies at home. These are the
-two great things in breaking down isolation, in getting connection—to
-have the child come to school with all the experience he has got outside
-the school, and to leave it with something to be immediately used in his
-everyday life. The child comes to the traditional school with a healthy
-body and a more or less unwilling mind, though, in fact, he does not
-bring both his body and mind with him; he has to leave his mind behind,
-because there is no way to use it in the school. If he had a purely
-abstract mind, he could bring it to school with him, but his is a
-concrete one, interested in concrete things, and unless these things get
-over into school life, he cannot take his mind with him. What we want is
-to have the child come to school with a whole mind and a whole body, and
-leave school with a fuller mind and an even healthier body. And speaking
-of the body suggests that, while there is no gymnasium in these
-diagrams, the active life carried on in its four corners brings with it
-constant physical exercise, while our gymnasium proper will deal with
-the particular weaknesses of children and their correction, and will
-attempt more consciously to build up the thoroughly sound body as the
-abode of the sound mind.
-
-[Illustration: Chart III]
-
- Business
- | |
- | |
- +------------+<= =>+------------+
- | | | |
- Technical Schools | | | Textile |
- Laboratory | Shop | | Industries |
- Research | | | |
- | +------+ |-----|
- | | |
- +-------+ +-------+<== |
- | | | =>
- | Library | Home
- | B | | =>
- +-------+ +-------+<== |
- University | | |
- Library | +------+ |-----|
- Museum | Dining | | |
- | Room | | Kitchen |
- | | | |
- | | ==>| |
- +------------+ | +------------+
- | |
- | |
- Garden<==
- Park
- Country
-
-That the dining-room and kitchen connect with the country and its
-processes and products it is hardly necessary to say. Cooking may be so
-taught that it has no connection with country life, and with the
-sciences that find their unity in geography. Perhaps it generally has
-been taught without these connections being really made. But all the
-materials that come into the kitchen have their origin in the country;
-they come from the soil, are nurtured through the influences of light
-and water, and represent a great variety of local environments. Through
-this connection, extending from the garden into the larger world, the
-child has his most natural introduction to the study of the sciences.
-Where did these things grow? What was necessary to their growth? What
-their relation to the soil? What the effect of different climatic
-conditions? and so on. We all know what the old-fashioned botany was:
-partly collecting flowers that were pretty, pressing and mounting them;
-partly pulling these flowers to pieces and giving technical names to the
-different parts, finding all the different leaves, naming all their
-different shapes and forms. It was a study of plants without any
-reference to the soil, to the country, or to growth. In contrast, a real
-study of plants takes them in their natural environment and in their
-uses as well, not simply as food, but in all their adaptations to the
-social life of man. Cooking becomes as well a most natural introduction
-to the study of chemistry, giving the child here also something which he
-can at once bring to bear upon his daily experience. I once heard a very
-intelligent woman say that she could not understand how science could be
-taught to little children, because she did not see how they could
-understand atoms and molecules. In other words, since she did not see
-how highly abstract facts could be presented to the child independently
-of daily experience, she could not understand how science could be
-taught at all. Before we smile at this remark, we need to ask ourselves
-if she is alone in her assumption, or whether it simply formulates
-almost all of our school practice.
-
-The same relations with the outside world are found in the carpentry and
-the textile shops. They connect with the country, as the source of their
-materials, with physics, as the science of applying energy, with
-commerce and distribution, with art in the development of architecture
-and decoration. They have also an intimate connection with the
-university on the side of its technological and engineering schools;
-with the laboratory, and its scientific methods and results.
-
-To go back to the square which is marked the library (Chart III, A): if
-you imagine rooms half in the four corners and half in the library, you
-will get the idea of the recitation room. That is the place where the
-children bring the experiences, the problems, the questions, the
-particular facts which they have found, and discuss them so that new
-light may be thrown upon them, particularly new light from the
-experience of others, the accumulated wisdom of the world—symbolized in
-the library. Here is the organic relation of theory and practice; the
-child not simply doing things, but getting also the _idea_ of what he
-does; getting from the start some intellectual conception that enters
-into his practice and enriches it; while every idea finds, directly or
-indirectly, some application in experience, and has some effect upon
-life. This, I need hardly say, fixes the position of the “book” or
-reading in education. Harmful as a substitute for experience, it is
-all-important in interpreting and expanding experience.
-
-The other chart (IV) illustrates precisely the same idea. It gives the
-symbolic upper story of this ideal school. In the upper corners are the
-laboratories; in the lower corners are the studios for art work, both
-the graphic and auditory arts. The questions, the chemical and physical
-problems, arising in the kitchen and shop, are taken to the laboratories
-to be worked out. For instance, this past week one of the older groups
-
-[Illustration: Chart IV]
-
- +------------+ +------------+
- | | | |
- | Physical | | Biological |
- Laboratories |and Chemical| | Laboratory |
- Research |Laboratories| | |
- | +------+ |
- | |
- +-------+ +-------+
- University | |
- | Museum |
- | |
- Library +-------+ +-------+
- Museum | |
- | +------+ |
- | | | |
- | Art | | Music |
- | | | |
- | | | |
- +------------+ +------------+
-
-of children doing practical work in weaving which involved the use of
-the spinning wheel, worked out the diagrams of the direction of forces
-concerned in treadle and wheel, and the ratio of velocities between
-wheel and spindle. In the same manner, the plants with which the child
-has to do in cooking, afford the basis for a concrete interest in
-botany, and may be taken and studied by themselves. In a certain school
-in Boston science work for months was centered in the growth of the
-cotton plant, and yet something new was brought in every day. We hope to
-do similar work with all the types of plants that furnish materials for
-sewing and weaving. These examples will suggest, I hope, the relation
-which the laboratories bear to the rest of the school.
-
-The drawing and music, or the graphic and auditory arts, represent the
-culmination, the idealization, the highest point of refinement of all
-the work carried on. I think everybody who has not a purely literary
-view of the subject recognizes that genuine art grows out of the work of
-the artisan. The art of the Renaissance was great, because it grew out
-of the manual arts of life. It did not spring up in a separate
-atmosphere, however ideal, but carried on to their spiritual meaning
-processes found in homely and everyday forms of life. The school should
-observe this relationship. The merely artisan side is narrow, but the
-mere art, taken by itself, and grafted on from without, tends to become
-forced, empty, sentimental. I do not mean, of course, that all art work
-must be correlated in detail to the other work of the school, but simply
-that a spirit of union gives vitality to the art, and depth and richness
-to the other work. All art involves physical organs, the eye and hand,
-the ear and voice; and yet it is something more than the mere technical
-skill required by the organs of expression. It involves an idea, a
-thought, a spiritual rendering of things; and yet it is other than any
-number of ideas by themselves. It is a living union of thought and the
-instrument of expression. This union is symbolized by saying that in the
-ideal school the art work might be considered to be that of the shops,
-passed through the alembic of library and museum into action again.
-
-Take the textile room as an illustration of such a synthesis. I am
-talking about a future school, the one we hope, some time, to have. The
-basal fact in that room is that it is a workshop, doing actual things in
-sewing, spinning, and weaving. The children come into immediate
-connection with the materials, with various fabrics of silk, cotton,
-linen and wool. Information at once appears in connection with these
-materials; their origin, history, their adaptation to particular uses,
-and the machines of various kinds by which the raw materials are
-utilized. Discipline arises in dealing with the problems involved, both
-theoretical and practical. Whence does the culture arise? Partly from
-seeing all these things reflected through the medium of their scientific
-and historic conditions and associations, whereby the child learns to
-appreciate them as technical achievements, as thoughts precipitated in
-action; and partly because of the introduction of the art idea into the
-room itself. In the ideal school there would be something of this sort:
-first, a complete industrial museum, giving samples of materials in
-various stages of manufacture, and the implements, from the simplest to
-the most complex, used in dealing with them; then a collection of
-photographs and pictures illustrating the landscapes and the scenes from
-which the materials come, their native homes, and their places of
-manufacture. Such a collection would be a vivid and continual lesson in
-the synthesis of art, science, and industry. There would be, also,
-samples of the more perfect forms of textile work, as Italian, French,
-Japanese, and Oriental. There would be objects illustrating motives of
-design and decoration which have entered into production. Literature
-would contribute its part in its idealized representation of the
-world-industries, as the Penelope in the Odyssey—a classic in literature
-only because the character is an adequate embodiment of a certain
-industrial phase of social life. So, from Homer down to the present
-time, there is a continuous procession of related facts which have been
-translated into terms of art. Music lends its share, from the Scotch
-song at the wheel to the spinning song of Marguerite, or of Wagner’s
-Senta. The shop becomes a pictured museum, appealing to the eye. It
-would have not only materials, beautiful woods and designs, but would
-give a synopsis of the historical evolution of architecture in its
-drawings and pictures.
-
-Thus I have attempted to indicate how the school may be connected with
-life so that the experience gained by the child in a familiar,
-commonplace way is carried over and made use of there, and what the
-child learns in the school is carried back and applied in everyday life,
-making the school an organic whole, instead of a composite of isolated
-parts. The isolation of studies as well as of parts of the school system
-disappears. Experience has its geographical aspect, its artistic and its
-literary, its scientific and its historical sides. All studies arise
-from aspects of the one earth and the one life lived upon it. We do not
-have a series of stratified earths, one of which is mathematical,
-another physical, another historical, and so on. We should not live very
-long in any one taken by itself. We live in a world where all sides are
-bound together. All studies grow out of relations in the one great
-common world. When the child lives in varied but concrete and active
-relationship to this common world, his studies are naturally unified. It
-will no longer be a problem to correlate studies. The teacher will not
-have to resort to all sorts of devices to weave a little arithmetic into
-the history lesson, and the like. Relate the school to life, and all
-studies are of necessity correlated.
-
-Moreover, if the school is related as a whole to life as a whole, its
-various aims and ideals—culture, discipline, information, utility—cease
-to be variants, for one of which we must select one study and for
-another another. The growth of the child in the direction of social
-capacity and service, his larger and more vital union with life, becomes
-the unifying aim; and discipline, culture and information fall into
-place as phases of this growth.
-
-I wish to say one word more about the relationship of our particular
-school to the University. The problem is to unify, to organize
-education, to bring all its various factors together, through putting it
-as a whole into organic union with everyday life. That which lies back
-of the pedagogical school of the University is the necessity of working
-out something to serve as a model for such unification, extending from
-work beginning with the four-year-old child up through the graduate work
-of the University. Already we have much help from the University in
-scientific work planned, sometimes even in detail, by heads of the
-departments. The graduate student comes to us with his researches and
-methods, suggesting ideas and problems. The library and museum are at
-hand. We want to bring all things educational together; to break down
-the barriers that divide the education of the little child from the
-instruction of the maturing youth; to identify the lower and the higher
-education, so that it shall be demonstrated to the eye that there is no
-lower and higher, but simply education.
-
-Speaking more especially with reference to the pedagogical side of the
-work: I suppose the oldest university chair of pedagogy in our country
-is about twenty years old—that of the University of Michigan, founded in
-the latter seventies. But there are only one or two that have tried to
-make a connection between theory and practice. They teach for the most
-part by theory, by lectures, by reference to books, rather than through
-the actual work of teaching itself. At Columbia, through the Teachers’
-College, there is an extensive and close connection between the
-University and the training of teachers. Something has been done in one
-or two other places along the same line. We want an even more intimate
-union here, so that the University shall put all its resources at the
-disposition of the elementary school, contributing to the evolution of
-valuable subject-matter and right method, while the school in turn will
-be a laboratory in which the student of education sees theories and
-ideas demonstrated, tested, criticised, enforced, and the evolution of
-new truths. We want the school in its relation to the University to be a
-working model of a unified education.
-
-A word as to the relation of the school to educational interests
-generally. I heard once that the adoption of a certain method in use in
-our school was objected to by a teacher on this ground: “You know that
-it is an experimental school. They do not work under the same conditions
-that we are subject to.” Now, the purpose of performing an experiment is
-that other people need not experiment; at least need not experiment so
-much, may have something definite and positive to go by. An experiment
-demands particularly favorable conditions in order that results may be
-reached both freely and securely. It has to work unhampered, with all
-the needed resources at command. Laboratories lie back of all the great
-business enterprises of today, back of every great factory, every
-railway and steamship system. Yet the laboratory is not a business
-enterprise; it does not aim to secure for itself the conditions of
-business life, nor does the commercial undertaking repeat the
-laboratory. There is a difference between working out and testing a new
-truth, or a new method, and applying it on a wide scale, making it
-available for the mass of men, making it commercial. But the first thing
-is to discover the truth, to afford all necessary facilities, for this
-is the most practical thing in the world in the long run. We do not
-expect to have other schools literally imitate what we do. A working
-model is not something to be copied; it is to afford a demonstration of
-the feasibility of the principle, and of the methods which make it
-feasible. So (to come back to our own point) we want here to work out
-the problem of the unity, the organization of the school system in
-itself, and to do this by relating it so intimately to life as to
-demonstrate the possibility and necessity of such organization for all
-education.
-
-
-
-
- IV
- THREE YEARS OF THE UNIVERSITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL[1]
-
-
-The school was started the first week in January, three years ago. I
-shall try this afternoon to give a brief statement of the ideas and
-problems that were in mind when the experiment was started, and a sketch
-of the development of the work since that time. We began in a small
-house in Fifty-seventh street, with fifteen children. We found ourselves
-the next year with twenty-five children in Kimbark avenue, and then
-moved in January to Rosalie court, the larger quarters enabling us to
-take forty children. The next year the numbers increased to sixty, the
-school remaining at Rosalie court. This year we have had ninety-five on
-the roll at one time, and are located at 5412 Ellis avenue, where we
-hope to stay till we have a building and grounds of our own.
-
-Footnote 1:
-
- Stenographic report of a talk by John Dewey at a meeting of the
- Parents’ Association of the University Elementary School, February,
- 1899; somewhat revised.
-
-The children during the first year of the school were between the ages
-of six and nine. Now their ages range between four and thirteen—the
-members of the oldest group being in their thirteenth year. This is the
-first year that we have children under six, and this has been made
-possible through the liberality of friends in Honolulu, H. I., who are
-building up there a memorial kindergarten along the same lines.
-
-The expenses of the school during the first year, of two terms only,
-were between $1,300 and $1,400. The expenses this year will be about
-$12,000. Of this amount $5,500 will come from tuitions; $5,000 has been
-given by friends interested in the school, and there remains about
-$1,500 yet to be raised for the conduct of the school. This is an
-indication of the increase of expenses. The average expense per pupil is
-about the same since the start, _i. e._, $120 per child per school year.
-Relatively speaking, this year the expenses of the school took something
-of a jump, through the expense of moving to a new building, and the
-repairs and changes there necessary. An increase in the staff of
-teachers has also enlarged the work as well as the debits of the school.
-Next year (1899–1900) we hope to have about 120 children, and apparently
-the expenses will be about $2,500 more than this. Of this amount $2,000
-will be met by the increase in tuition from the pupils. The cost of a
-child to the school, $120 a year, is precisely the tuition charged by
-the University for students and is double the average tuition charged by
-the school. But it is not expected that the University tuition will come
-anywhere near meeting the expense involved there. One reason for not
-increasing the tuition here, even if it were advisable for other
-reasons, is that it is well to emphasize, from an educational point of
-view, that elementary as well as advanced education requires endowment.
-There is every reason why money should be spent freely for the
-organization and maintenance of foundation work in education as well as
-for the later stages.
-
-The elementary school has had from the outset two sides: one, the
-obvious one of instruction of the children who have been intrusted to
-it; the other, relationship to the University, since the school is under
-the charge, and forms a part of the pedagogical work of the University.
-
-When the school was started, there were certain ideas in mind—perhaps it
-would be better to say questions and problems; certain points which it
-seemed worth while to test. If you will permit one personal word, I
-should like to say that it is sometimes thought that the school started
-out with a number of ready-made principles and ideas which were to be
-put into practice at once. It has been popularly assumed that I am the
-author of these ready-made ideas and principles which were to go into
-execution. I take this opportunity to say that the educational conduct
-of the school, as well as its administration, the selection of
-subject-matter, and the working out of the course of study, as well as
-actual instruction of children, have been almost entirely in the hands
-of the teachers of the school; and that there has been a gradual
-development of the educational principles and methods involved, not a
-fixed equipment. The teachers started with question marks, rather than
-with fixed rules, and if any answers have been reached, it is the
-teachers in the school who have supplied them. We started upon the whole
-with four such questions, or problems:
-
-1. What can be done, and how can it be done, to bring the school into
-closer relation with the home and neighborhood life—instead of having
-the school a place where the child comes solely to learn certain
-lessons? What can be done to break down the barriers which have
-unfortunately come to separate the school life from the rest of the
-everyday life of the child? This does not mean, as it is sometimes,
-perhaps, interpreted to mean, that the child should simply take up in
-the school things already experienced at home and study them, but that,
-so far as possible, the child shall have the same attitude and point of
-view in the school as in the home; that he shall find the same interest
-in going to school, and in there doing things worth doing for their own
-sake, that he finds in the plays and occupations which busy him in his
-home and neighborhood life. It means, again, that the motives which keep
-the child at work and growing at home shall be used in the school, so
-that he shall not have to acquire another set of principles of actions
-belonging only to the school—separate from those of the home. It is a
-question of the unity of the child’s experience, of its actuating
-motives and aims, not of amusing or even interesting the child.
-
-2. What can be done in the way of introducing subject-matter in history
-and science and art, that shall have a positive value and real
-significance in the child’s own life; that shall represent, even to the
-youngest children, something worthy of attainment in skill or knowledge;
-as much so to the little pupil as are the studies of the high-school or
-college student to him? You know what the traditional curriculum of the
-first few years is, even though many modifications have been made. Some
-statistics have been collected showing that 75 or 80 per cent. of the
-first three years of a child in school are spent upon the form—not the
-substance—of learning, the mastering of the symbols of reading, writing,
-and arithmetic. There is not much positive nutriment in this. Its
-purpose is important—is necessary—but it does not represent the same
-kind of increase in a child’s intellectual and moral experience that is
-represented by positive truth of history and nature, or by added insight
-into reality and beauty. One thing, then, we wanted to find out is how
-much can be given a child that is really worth his while to get, in
-knowledge of the world about him, of the forces in the world, of
-historical and social growth, and in capacity to express himself in a
-variety of artistic forms. From the strictly educational side this has
-been the chief problem of the school. It is along this line that we hope
-to make our chief contribution to education in general; we hope, that
-is, to work out and publish a positive body of subject-matter which may
-be generally available.
-
-3. How can instruction in these formal, symbolic branches—the mastering
-of the ability to read, write, and use figures intelligently—be carried
-on with everyday experience and occupation as their background and in
-definite relations to other studies of more inherent content, and be
-carried on in such a way that the child shall feel their necessity
-through their connection with subjects which appeal to him on their own
-account? If this can be accomplished, he will have a vital motive for
-getting the technical capacity. It is not meant, as has been sometimes
-jocosely stated, that the child learn to bake and sew at school, and to
-read, write, and figure at home. It is intended that these formal
-subjects shall not be presented in such large doses at first as to be
-the exclusive objects of attention, and that the child shall be led by
-that which he is doing to feel the need for acquiring skill in the use
-of symbols and the immediate power they give. In any school, if the
-child realizes the motive for the use and application of number and
-language he has taken the longest step toward securing the power; and he
-can realize the motive only as he has some particular—not some general
-and remote—use for the symbols.
-
-4. Individual attention. This is secured by small groupings—eight or ten
-in a class—and a large number of teachers supervising systematically the
-intellectual needs and attainments and physical well-being and growth of
-the child. To secure this we have now 135 hours of instructors’ time per
-week, that is, the time of nine teachers for three hours per day, or one
-teacher per group. It requires but a few words to make this statement
-about attention to individual powers and needs, and yet the whole of the
-school’s aims and methods, moral, physical, intellectual, are bound up
-in it.
-
-I think these four points present a fair statement of what we have set
-out to discover. The school is often called an experimental school, and
-in one sense that is the proper name. I do not like to use it too much,
-for fear parents will think we are experimenting upon the children, and
-that they naturally object to. But it is an experimental school—at least
-I hope so—with reference to education and educational problems. We have
-attempted to find out by trying, by doing—not alone by discussion and
-theorizing—_whether_ these problems may be worked out, and _how_ they
-may be worked out.
-
-Next a few words about the means that have been used in the school in
-order to test these four questions, and to supply their answers, and
-first as to the place given to hand-work of different kinds in the
-school. There are three main lines regularly pursued: (_a_) the
-shop-work with wood and tools, (_b_) cooking work, and (_c_) work with
-textiles—sewing and weaving. Of course, there is other hand-work in
-connection with science, as science is largely of an experimental
-nature. It is a fact that may not have come to your attention that a
-large part of the best and most advanced scientific work involves a
-great deal of manual skill, the training of the hand and eye. It is
-impossible for one to be a first-class worker in science without this
-training in manipulation, and in handling apparatus and materials. In
-connection with the history work, especially with the younger children,
-hand-work is brought in in the way of making implements, weapons, tools,
-etc. Of course, the art work is another side—drawing, painting, and
-modeling. Logically, perhaps, the gymnasium work does not come in here,
-but as a means of developing moral and intellectual control through the
-medium of the body it certainly does. The children have one-half hour
-per day of this form of physical exercise. Along this line we have found
-that hand-work, in large variety and amount, is the most easy and
-natural method of keeping up the same attitude of the child in and out
-of the school. The child gets the largest part of his acquisitions
-through his bodily activities, until he learns to work systematically
-with the intellect. That is the purpose of this work in the school, to
-direct these activities, to systematize and organize them, so that they
-shall not be as haphazard and as wandering as they are outside of
-school. The problem of making these forms of practical activity work
-continuously and definitely together, leading from one factor of skill
-to another, from one intellectual difficulty to another, has been one of
-the most difficult, and at the same time one in which we have been most
-successful. The various kinds of work, carpentry, cooking, sewing, and
-weaving, are selected as involving different kinds of skill, and
-demanding different types of intellectual attitude on the part of the
-child, and because they represent some of the most important activities
-of the everyday outside world: the question of living under shelter, of
-daily food and clothing, of the home, of personal movement and exchange
-of goods. He gets also the training of sense organs, of touch, of sight,
-and the ability to coördinate eye and hand. He gets healthy exercise;
-for the child demands a much larger amount of physical activity than the
-formal program of the ordinary school permits. There is also a continual
-appeal to memory, to judgment, in adapting ends to means, a training in
-habits of order, industry, and neatness in the care of the tools and
-utensils, and in doing things in a systematic, instead of a haphazard,
-way. Then, again, these practical occupations make a background,
-especially in the earlier groups, for the later studies. The children
-get a good deal of chemistry in connection with cooking, of number work
-and geometrical principles in carpentry, and a good deal of geography in
-connection with their theoretical work in weaving and sewing. History
-also comes in with the origin and growth of various inventions, and
-their effects upon social life and political organization.
-
-Perhaps more attention, upon the whole, has been given to our second
-point, that of positive subject-matter, than to any one other thing. On
-the history side the curriculum is now fairly well worked out. The
-younger children begin with the home and occupations of the home. In the
-sixth year the intention is that the children should study occupations
-outside the home, the larger social industries—farming, mining, lumber,
-etc.—that they may see the complex and various social industries on
-which life depends, while incidentally they investigate the use of the
-various materials—woods, metals, and the processes applied—thus getting
-a beginning of scientific study. The next year is given to the
-historical development of industry and invention—starting with man as a
-savage and carrying him through the typical phases of his progress
-upward, until the iron age is reached and man begins to enter upon a
-civilized career. The object of the study of primitive life is not to
-keep the child interested in lower and relatively savage stages, but to
-show him the steps of progress and development, especially along the
-line of invention, by which man was led into civilization. There is a
-certain nearness, after all, in the child to primitive forms of life.
-They are much more simple than existing institutions. By throwing the
-emphasis upon the progress of man, and upon the way advance has been
-made, we hope to avoid the objections that hold against paying too much
-attention to the crudities and distracting excitements of savage life.
-
-The next two or three years, _i. e._, the fourth and fifth grades, and
-perhaps the sixth, will be devoted to American history. It is then that
-history, properly speaking, begins, as the study of primitive life can
-hardly be so called.
-
-Then comes Greek history and Roman, in the regular chronological order,
-each year having its own work planned with reference to what has come
-before and after.
-
-The science work was more difficult to arrange and systematize, because
-there was so little to follow—so little that has been already done in an
-organized way. We are now at work upon a program,[2] and I shall not
-speak in detail about it. The first two or three years cultivate the
-children’s powers of observation, lead them to sympathetic interest in
-the habits of plants and animals, and to look at things with reference
-to their uses. Then the center of the work becomes geographical—the
-study of the earth, as the most central thing. From this almost all the
-work grows out, and to it the work goes back. Another standpoint in the
-science work is that of the application of natural forces to the service
-of man through machines. Last year a good deal of work was done in
-electricity (and will be repeated this year), based on the telegraph and
-telephone—taking up the things that can easily be grasped.
-
-Footnote 2:
-
- This year’s program is published in the _Elementary School Record_.
- Address The University of Chicago Press for particulars.
-
-In mechanics they have studied locks and clocks with reference to the
-adaptation of the various parts of the machinery. All this work makes a
-most excellent basis for more formal physics later on. Cooking gives
-opportunity for getting a great many ideas of heat and water, and of
-their effects. The scientific work taken up in the school differs mainly
-from that of other schools in having the experimental part—physics and
-chemistry—emphasized, and is not confined simply to nature study—the
-study of plants and animals. Not that the latter is less valuable, but
-that we find it possible to introduce the physical aspects from the
-first.
-
-If I do not spend a large amount of time in speaking of the music and
-art work, it is not because they are not considered valuable and
-important—certainly as much so as any other work done in the school, not
-only in the development of the child’s moral and æsthetic nature, but
-also from a strictly intellectual point of view. I know of no work in
-the school that better develops the power of attention, the habit of
-observation and of consecutiveness, of seeing parts in relation to a
-whole.
-
-I shall now say a few words about the administrative side of the school.
-At the outset we mixed up the children of different ages and attainments
-as much as possible, believing there were mental advantages in the
-give-and-take thus secured, as well as the moral advantages in having
-the older assume certain responsibilities in the care of the younger. As
-the school grew, it became necessary to abandon the method, and to group
-the children with reference to their common capacities. These groupings,
-however, are based, not on ability to read and write, but upon
-similarity of mental attitude and interest, and upon general
-intellectual capacity and mental alertness. There are ways in which we
-are still trying to carry out the idea of mixing up the children, that
-we may not build the rigid stepladder system of the “graded” school. One
-step in this direction is having the children move about and come in
-contact with different teachers. While there are difficulties and evils
-connected with this, I think one of the most useful things in the school
-is that children come into intimate relation with a number of different
-personalities. The children also meet in general assemblies—for singing,
-and for the report of the whole school work as read by members of the
-different groups. The older children are also given a half hour a week
-in which to join some of the younger groups, and, if possible, as in
-hand-work, enter into the work of the younger children. In various ways
-we are attempting to keep a family spirit throughout the school, and not
-the feeling of isolated classes and grades.
-
-The organization of the teaching force has gradually become
-departmental, as the needs of the work have indicated its chief
-branches. So we now have recognized divisions of Science, History,
-Domestic or Household Arts, Manual Training in the limited sense (wood
-and metals), Music, Art (that is, drawing, water colors, clay modeling,
-etc.), and Gymnasium. As the work goes on into the secondary period, the
-languages and mathematics will also of necessity assume a more
-differentiated and distinct position. As it is sometimes said that
-correlated or thoroughly harmonized work cannot be secured upon this
-basis, I am happy to say that our experience shows positively that there
-are no intrinsic difficulties. Through common devotion to the best
-development of the child, through common loyalty to the main aims and
-methods of the school, our teachers have demonstrated that in education,
-as in business, the best organization is secured through proper regard
-for natural divisions of labor, interest, and training. The child
-secures the advantage in discipline and knowledge of contact with
-experts in each line, while the individual teachers serve the common
-thought in diverse ways, thus multiplying and reinforcing it.
-
-Upon the moral side, that of so-called discipline and order, where the
-work of the University Elementary School has perhaps suffered most from
-misunderstanding and misrepresentation, I shall say only that our ideal
-has been, and continues to be, that of the best form of family life,
-rather than that of a rigid graded school. In the latter, the large
-number of children under the care of a single teacher, and the very
-limited number of modes of activity open to the pupils, have made
-necessary certain fixed and somewhat external forms of “keeping order.”
-It would be very stupid to copy these, under the changed conditions of
-our school, its small groups permitting and requiring the most intimate
-personal acquaintance of child and teacher, and its great variety of
-forms of work, with their differing adaptations to the needs of
-different children. If we have permitted to our children more than the
-usual amount of freedom, it has not been in order to relax or decrease
-real discipline, but because under our particular conditions larger and
-less artificial responsibilities could thus be required of the children,
-and their entire development of body and spirit be more harmonious and
-complete. And I am confident that the parents who have intrusted their
-children to us for any length of time will agree in saying that, while
-the children like, or love, to come to school, yet work, and not
-amusement, has been the spirit and teaching of the school; and that this
-freedom has been granted under such conditions of intelligent and
-sympathetic oversight as to be a means of upbuilding and strengthening
-character.
-
-At the end of three years, then, we are not afraid to say that some of
-our original questions have secured affirmative answers. The increase of
-our children from fifteen to almost one hundred, along with a practical
-doubling of fees, has shown that parents are ready for a form of
-education that makes individual growth its sole controlling aim. The
-presence of an organized corps of instructors demonstrates that
-thoroughly educated teachers are ready to bring to elementary education
-the same resources of training, knowledge, and skill that have long been
-at the command of higher education. The everyday work of the school
-shows that children can live in school as out of it, and yet grow daily
-in wisdom, kindness, and the spirit of obedience—that learning may, even
-with little children, lay hold upon the substance of truth that
-nourishes the spirit, and yet the forms of knowledge be observed and
-cultivated; and that growth may be genuine and thorough, and yet a
-delight.
-
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-
-
-
- TRANSCRIBER’S NOTES
-
-
- 1. Silently corrected typographical errors.
- 2. Retained anachronistic and non-standard spellings as printed.
- 3. Enclosed italics font in _underscores_.
-
-
-
-
-
-End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The School and Society, by John Dewey
-
-*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE SCHOOL AND SOCIETY ***
-
-***** This file should be named 53910-0.txt or 53910-0.zip *****
-This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
- http://www.gutenberg.org/5/3/9/1/53910/
-
-Produced by Richard Tonsing and the Online Distributed
-Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was
-produced from images generously made available by The
-Internet Archive)
-
-Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions will
-be renamed.
-
-Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
-law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
-so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
-States without permission and without paying copyright
-royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
-of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
-concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
-and may not be used if you charge for the eBooks, unless you receive
-specific permission. If you do not charge anything for copies of this
-eBook, complying with the rules is very easy. You may use this eBook
-for nearly any purpose such as creation of derivative works, reports,
-performances and research. They may be modified and printed and given
-away--you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks
-not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the
-trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.
-
-START: FULL LICENSE
-
-THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
-PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK
-
-To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
-distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
-(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
-Project Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at
-www.gutenberg.org/license.
-
-Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-
-1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
-and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
-(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
-the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
-destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your
-possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
-Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
-by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the
-person or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph
-1.E.8.
-
-1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be
-used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
-agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
-things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
-paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this
-agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
-
-1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the
-Foundation" or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
-of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual
-works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
-States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
-United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
-claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
-displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
-all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
-that you will support the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting
-free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm
-works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
-Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with the work. You can easily
-comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
-same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg-tm License when
-you share it without charge with others.
-
-1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
-what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
-in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
-check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
-agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
-distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
-other Project Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no
-representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
-country outside the United States.
-
-1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
-
-1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
-immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear
-prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work
-on which the phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the
-phrase "Project Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed,
-performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
-
- This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
- most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no
- restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it
- under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this
- eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the
- United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you
- are located before using this ebook.
-
-1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is
-derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
-contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
-copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
-the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
-redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase "Project
-Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
-either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
-obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
-with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
-must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
-additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
-will be linked to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works
-posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
-beginning of this work.
-
-1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
-License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
-work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.
-
-1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
-electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
-prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
-active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm License.
-
-1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
-compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
-any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
-to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format
-other than "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official
-version posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site
-(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
-to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
-of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original "Plain
-Vanilla ASCII" or other form. Any alternate format must include the
-full Project Gutenberg-tm License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
-
-1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
-performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
-unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
-
-1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
-access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
-provided that
-
-* You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
- the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
- you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
- to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he has
- agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
- within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
- legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
- payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
- Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
- Section 4, "Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
- Literary Archive Foundation."
-
-* You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
- you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
- does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
- License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
- copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
- all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg-tm
- works.
-
-* You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
- any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
- electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
- receipt of the work.
-
-* You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
- distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.
-
-1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work or group of works on different terms than
-are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
-from both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and The
-Project Gutenberg Trademark LLC, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm
-trademark. Contact the Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.
-
-1.F.
-
-1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
-effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
-works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
-Gutenberg-tm collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
-contain "Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
-or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
-intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
-other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
-cannot be read by your equipment.
-
-1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
-of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
-Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
-liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
-fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
-LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
-PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
-TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
-LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
-INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
-DAMAGE.
-
-1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
-defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
-receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
-written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
-received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
-with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
-with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
-lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
-or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
-opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
-the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
-without further opportunities to fix the problem.
-
-1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
-in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO
-OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
-LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
-
-1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
-warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
-damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
-violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
-agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
-limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
-unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
-remaining provisions.
-
-1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
-trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
-providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in
-accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
-production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
-electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
-including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
-the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
-or any Project Gutenberg-tm work, (b) alteration, modification, or
-additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any
-Defect you cause.
-
-Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
-electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
-computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
-exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
-from people in all walks of life.
-
-Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
-assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
-goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
-remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
-Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
-and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future
-generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
-Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at
-www.gutenberg.org
-
-
-
-Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
-
-The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
-501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
-state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
-Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
-number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
-U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.
-
-The Foundation's principal office is in Fairbanks, Alaska, with the
-mailing address: PO Box 750175, Fairbanks, AK 99775, but its
-volunteers and employees are scattered throughout numerous
-locations. Its business office is located at 809 North 1500 West, Salt
-Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up to
-date contact information can be found at the Foundation's web site and
-official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact
-
-For additional contact information:
-
- Dr. Gregory B. Newby
- Chief Executive and Director
- gbnewby@pglaf.org
-
-Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
-Literary Archive Foundation
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
-spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
-increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
-freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
-array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
-($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
-status with the IRS.
-
-The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
-charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
-States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
-considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
-with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
-where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
-DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular
-state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
-have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
-against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
-approach us with offers to donate.
-
-International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
-any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
-outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
-
-Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
-methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
-ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
-donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate
-
-Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works.
-
-Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
-Gutenberg-tm concept of a library of electronic works that could be
-freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
-distributed Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of
-volunteer support.
-
-Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
-editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
-the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
-necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
-edition.
-
-Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search
-facility: www.gutenberg.org
-
-This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
-including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
-Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
-subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
-