diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'old')
| -rw-r--r-- | old/42027-0.txt | 16879 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/42027-0.zip | bin | 367655 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/42027-8.txt | 16905 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/42027-8.zip | bin | 363392 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/42027-h.zip | bin | 420078 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/42027-h/42027-h.htm | 22772 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/42027-h/images/001.png | bin | 1112 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/42027.txt | 16905 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/42027.zip | bin | 362772 -> 0 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | old/readme.htm | 13 |
10 files changed, 0 insertions, 73474 deletions
diff --git a/old/42027-0.txt b/old/42027-0.txt deleted file mode 100644 index e5033e2..0000000 --- a/old/42027-0.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,16879 +0,0 @@ -The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Expositor's Bible, by F. W. Farrar - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - - -Title: The Expositor's Bible - The Second Book of Kings - -Author: F. W. Farrar - -Editor: W. Robertson Nicoll - -Release Date: February 5, 2013 [EBook #42027] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: UTF-8 - -*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE *** - - - - -Produced by Douglas L. Alley, III, Colin Bell and the -Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net -(This file was produced from images generously made -available by The Internet Archive) - - - - - - - - - - The - - Expositor's Bible - - - Edited by - W. Robertson Nicoll, D.D., LL.D. - - - - - - - - - -[Illustration] - - - - - THE EXPOSITORS' BIBLE - - _Edited by_ W. ROBERTSON NICOLL, D.D., LL.D. - - _New and Cheaper Edition. Printed from original plates - Complete in every detail. Uniform with this volume_ - - Price 50 cents per volume. (If by mail add 10 cents postage) - - - OLD TESTAMENT VOLUMES - - GENESIS. By Rev. Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D. - - EXODUS. By Very Rev. G. A. Chadwick, D.D., Dean of Armagh. - - LEVITICUS. By Rev. S. H. Kellogg, D.D. - - NUMBERS. By Rev. R. A. Watson, D.D. - - DEUTERONOMY. By Rev. Prof. Andrew Harper, B.D. - - JOSHUA. By Rev. Prof. W. G. Blaikie, D.D., LL.D. - - JUDGES AND RUTH. By Rev. R. A. Watson, D.D. - - FIRST SAMUEL. By Rev. Prof. W. G. Blaikie, D.D., LL.D. - - SECOND SAMUEL. By same author. - - FIRST KINGS. By F. W. Farrar, D.D., Dean of Canterbury. - - SECOND KINGS. By same author. - - FIRST AND SECOND CHRONICLES. By Rev. Prof. W. H. Bennett. - - EZRA, NEHEMIAH, AND ESTHER. By Rev. Prof. W. F. Adeney. - - JOB. By Rev. R. A. Watson, D.D. - - PSALMS. In 3 vols. Vol. I., Chapters I.-XXXVIII.; Vol. II., Chapters - XXXIX.-LXXXIX.; Vol. III., Chapters XC.-CL. By Rev. - Alexander Maclaren, D.D. - - PROVERBS. By Rev. R. F. Horton, D.D. - - ECCLESIASTES. By Rev. Samuel Cox, D.D. - - SONG OF SOLOMON and LAMENTATIONS. By Rev. Prof. W. F. Adeney. - - ISAIAH. In 2 vols. Vol. I., Chapters I.-XXXIX.; Vol. II., - Chapters XL.-LXVI. By Prof. George Adam Smith, D.D., LL.D. - - JEREMIAH. Chapters I.-XX. With a Sketch of his Life and Times. By - Rev. C. J. Ball. - - JEREMIAH. Chapters XXI.-LII. By Rev. Prof. W. H. Bennett. - - EZEKIEL. By Rev. Prof. John Skinner. - - DANIEL. By F. W. FARRAR, D.D., Dean of Canterbury. - - THE TWELVE (Minor) PROPHETS. In 2 vols. By Rev. George Adam Smith, - D.D., LL.D. - - - NEW TESTAMENT VOLUMES - - ST. MATTHEW. By Rev. J. Monro Gibson, D.D. - - ST. MARK. By Very Rev. G. A. Chadwick, D.D., Dean of Armagh. - - ST. LUKE. By Rev. Henry Burton. - - GOSPEL OF ST. JOHN. In 2 vols. Vol. I., Chapters I.-XI.; Vol. II., - Chapters XII.-XXI. By Rev. Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D. - - THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. In 2 vols. By Rev. Prof. G. T. Stokes, D.D. - - ROMANS. By Rev. Handley C. G. Moule, D.D. - - FIRST CORINTHIANS. By Rev. Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D. - - SECOND CORINTHIANS. By Rev. James Denney, D.D. - - GALATIANS. By Rev. Prof. G. G. Findlay, D.D. - - EPHESIANS. By same author. - - PHILIPPIANS. By Rev. Principal Robert Rainy, D.D. - - COLOSSIANS and PHILEMON. By Rev. Alexander Maclaren, D.D. - - THESSALONIANS. By Rev. James Denney, D.D. - - PASTORAL EPISTLES. By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D. - - HEBREWS. By Rev. Principal T. C. Edwards, D.D. - - ST. JAMES and ST. JUDE. By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D. - - ST. PETER. By Rev. Prof. J. Rawson Lumby, D.D. - - EPISTLES OF ST. JOHN. By Rt. Rev. W. Alexander, Lord Bishop of Derry. - - REVELATION. By Prof. W. Milligan, D.D. - - INDEX VOLUME TO ENTIRE SERIES. - - _New York_: HODDER & STOUGHTON, _Publishers_ - - - - - THE - SECOND BOOK OF KINGS - - - - - - BY - F. W. Farrar, D.D., F.R.S. - - LATE FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE; ARCHDEACON OF - WESTMINSTER - - - - - - - - HODDER & STOUGHTON - NEW YORK - GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY - - - - - CONTENTS - - - - CHAPTER I - - PAGE - - AHAZIAH BEN-AHAB OF ISRAEL (B.C. 855-854) 3 - - A weak, shadowy, and faithless king--1. Relations between Judah and - Israel--2. Alliance with Jehoshaphat--3. Revolt of Moab--Mesha and - the Moabite Stone--4. The fall from the lattice--Baal-Zebub--Elijah - calling down fire from heaven--How are we to judge respecting the - Elijah-spirit?--Variations of moral standard. - - CHAPTER II - - THE ASCENSION OF ELIJAH 19 - - Uncertain date--The journey to Gilgal; to Bethel; to Jericho; to - the Jordan--The double portion--Chariot and horses of fire--Elisha - recrosses the Jordan--The young prophets and their - search--Grandeur of Elijah. - - CHAPTER III - - ELISHA 25 - - Cycle of supernatural stories--Elisha and Elijah--The cure of the - unwholesome fountain--"Go up, thou bald-head"--The children and - the bears. - - CHAPTER IV - - THE INVASION OF MOAB 29 - - Death of Ahaziah--Jehoram Ben-Ahab of Israel--Good - beginnings--Attempts to recover Moab--Alliance with Judah and - Edom--The invasion--An army perishing of - thirst--Elisha--Music--Trenches in the wâdy--Error of the - Moabites--Their disastrous rout--Devastation of the - country--Mesha propitiates Chemosh--"Great wrath against - Israel"--The invading army retreats. - - CHAPTER V - - ELISHA'S MIRACLES 40 - - Their chronological vagueness--Difference between Elisha and - Elijah--Contrasts and resemblances--Social life in Israel--1. The - widow and the oil--2. The lady of Shunem--Her hospitality--Her - reward--3. The boy's death--Her distress--The resuscitation--4. - Death in the pot--5. The multiplied first-fruits. - - CHAPTER VI - - THE STORY OF NAAMAN 50 - - The little maid--The leper--Letter of Benhadad to Jehoram--His - indignation--Elisha's message--Naaman's disappointment and - anger--His servants--His healing--His gratitude--Bowing in the - house of Rimmon--Mean cupidity of Gehazi--Stricken with - leprosy--The axe-head. - - CHAPTER VII - - ELISHA AND THE SYRIANS 66 - - Syrian marauders--They are baffled--Anger of Benhadad--The vision - at Dothan--Meaning of the promises--How fulfilled to God's saints - on earth--Some are delivered, some are not--Elisha misleads the - Syrians--His generosity to them--Its effects--A fresh Syrian - invasion. - - CHAPTER VIII - - THE FAMINE AND THE SIEGE 76 - - Horrible straits of the besieged Samaritans--Stress of famine--The - King of Israel--The miserable women--Sackcloth under the - purple--The king's fury and despair--He threatens Elisha--The - messenger--The king upbraids him--Prophecy of sudden plenty--The - disbelieving lord--The extramural lepers--The Syrian camp--The - king's misgivings--The lord killed in the rush of the people. - - CHAPTER IX - - THE SHUNAMMITE AND HAZAEL 87 - - The lady of Shunem leaves her estate--Her return--Gehazi talks with - the king--Entrance of the Shunammite--Her estates restored--Elisha - visits Damascus--A royal present--Benhadad's illness--Hazael--The - dark prophecy--Unexplained death of Benhadad--Hazael's - usurpation--Real meaning of Elisha's words to Hazael. - - CHAPTER X - - TWO SONS OF JEHOSHAPHAT 99 - - Jehoram (B.C. 851-843)--Ahaziah (B.C. 843-842)--Jehoram - ben-Jehoshaphat of Judah--Perplexing uncertainty of minute - chronological details--The blight of the Jezebel-alliance--The - husband of Athaliah--His apostasies--Revolt of Edom--Narrow escape - of Jehoram--Revolt of Libnah--Jehoram's murder by his - brethren--Philistine invasion--Incurable disease--Ahaziah - ben-Jehoram--Joins his uncle (Jehoram ben-Ahab) in the campaign - against Ramoth-Gilead--Visits him at Jezreel--Shot down by Jehu. - - CHAPTER XI - - THE REVOLT OF JEHU (B.C. 842) 106 - - Misery of Jehoram's reign--Thwarted invasion of Moab--Aggression - of Benhadad--At Ramoth-Gilead--The young prophet--The two kings - absent from the camp--The dangerous commission--The assembled - captains--Jehu secretly anointed--His accession enthusiastically - welcomed by the army--His sudden enthronement--His swift - resolution--The watchman at Jezreel--The two horsemen--The two - kings--Their murder--Ferocity of Jehu--Elijah's - prophecy--Jezebel--She is hurled down--Jehu drives over her - body--The curse fulfilled. - - CHAPTER XII - - JEHU ESTABLISHED ON THE THRONE (B.C. 842-814) 125 - - His politic subtlety--The murder of the seventy princes--The - ghastly heaps--Hypocritic ferocity. - - CHAPTER XIII - - FRESH MURDERS--THE EXTIRPATION OF BAAL-WORSHIP (B.C. 842) 131 - - Wading through blood to a throne--The ride to Samaria--The brethren - of Ahaziah of Judah--The corpse-choked tank of the shepherds--The - Bedawy ascetic--The scene of slaughter in the temple of Baal--Did - Elisha approve of these atrocities?--Prophetic judgment on - Jehu--Ravages of Hazael--Jehu's anguish--He pays tribute to Assyria. - - CHAPTER XIV - - ATHALIAH (B.C. 842-836)--JOASH OF JUDAH (B.C. 836-796) 146 - - The murderess-daughter of Jezebel--Fierce ambition--Jehosheba--The - rescued child--Reared in the Temple--The high priest's plot--The - coronation of the boy-king--Athaliah enters the Temple--Her - murder--The fate of Baal's high priest--Proposed restoration of - the Temple--Joash calls to task the defaulting priests--Death of - Jehoiada--Defection of Joash--Murder of Zechariah--Bad record of - the line of Jewish priests--Hazael attacks Judah--Defeat of Joash - and plunder of Jerusalem--Murder of Joash--Names of the murderers. - - CHAPTER XV - - AMAZIAH OF JUDAH (B.C. 796-783[?]) 167 - - The House of David--Amaziah brings to justice the murderers of his - father, but spares their children--Grounds for this--Different - views taken of him by the historian and the chronicler--Splendid - victory of Amaziah in the Valley of Salt--Expansion of the story - in the Chronicles--His defiance of Joash--His defeat and murder. - - CHAPTER XVI - - THE DYNASTY OF JEHU--JEHOAHAZ (B.C. 814-797)--JOASH - (B.C. 797-781) 175 - - Israel at its nadir--Calf-worship--Oppression of - Hazael--Disappearance of Elisha--Repentance of Jehoahaz--Joash of - Israel visits the death-bed of Elisha--"The arrow of the Lord's - deliverance"--Three victories over the Syrians--Death of Elisha, - and posthumous marvels--Joash and Amaziah--Contemptuous answer to - the King of Judah--Crushing defeat of Judah. - - CHAPTER XVII - - THE DYNASTY OF JEHU (CONTINUED)--JEROBOAM II. (B.C. 781-740) 187 - - Jeroboam II. the greatest of the kings of Israel--His conquests - and wide dominion--A dying gleam of prosperity--Cause of his - success--Relations with Assyria--Dawn of written prophecy--Jonah. - - CHAPTER XVIII - - AMOS AND HOSEA--ZACHARIAH BEN-JEROBOAM (B.C. 740) 193 - - Amos describes the condition of Israel--Growth of usury and - vice--Humble origin of Amos--His burdens--Degenerations of the - "calf-worship"--Uncompromising denunciation--Collision of Amos - with Amaziah the high priest at Bethel--His expulsion from - Bethel--The curse denounced--His justification of his - mission--Hosea the saddest of the prophets--His pictures of - Ephraim--Jeroboam II.--His death--His son Zachariah--His - desertion and shameful end. - - CHAPTER XIX - - UZZIAH OF JUDAH (B.C. 783[?]-737)--JOTHAM (B.C. 737-735) 209 - - Wane of Assyria--Uzziah a wise and good king--His other name - Azariah--Expansion of the story of his conquests in the - Chronicles--Training of his army--Defeated by the Assyrians - (?)--Stricken with leprosy--The story--Jotham acts as his public - representative--Diminished power of Judah under Jotham--Beginning - of Isaiah's prophecies--Death of Jotham. - - CHAPTER XX - - THE AGONY OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM--SHALLUM, MENAHEM, PEKAHIAH, - PEKAH (B.C. 740-734) 217 - - Shallum, an usurping murderer--Rapid disappearance of - kings--Distracted epoch--The prophet Zechariah and the three - shepherds--Zechariah's prophecies--The cruel shepherd, - Menahem--His savage deeds--Portentous appearance of the Assyrians - in Israel--Menahem pays tribute--Tiglath-Pileser--Fulfilment of - Hosea's prophecy--Pekahiah--His murder--Pekah--His alliance with - Rezin against Judah--Ahaz appeals to Assyria--Defeat and death of - Rezin--Fulfilment of prophecy of Amos--Beginning of the captivity - of the Ten Tribes--Tiglath-Pileser's successors--Murder of Pekah - by Hoshea--Horrible state of Israel as described by Isaiah. - - CHAPTER XXI - - KING HOSHEA AND THE FALL OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM (B.C. - 734-725) 235 - - The name Hoshea--The king and the prophet--Occasional gleams of hope - and promise--A humiliating reign--Death of Tiglath-Pileser--Hoshea - revolts to Sabaco of Egypt--Seized by Shalmaneser--Samaria - besieged--Terrible state of the city--Sabaco renders no - help--Usurpation of Sargon--Capture of the city--Greatness of - Sargon--Fall of the Northern Kingdom--Blighted destiny--God's - mercy--"God, and not man"--Despoliation of the tribes--Moral of the - story--Assyria and Egypt--The strength and weakness of a - nation--Machiavelli--Mixture of alien emigrants--Their worship--The - lions--Strange syncretism--The Jews and the Samaritans. - - CHAPTER XXII - - THE REIGN OF AHAZ (B.C. 735-715) 260 - - The chronology--A distracted kingdom--Dark pictures from - Isaiah--No sign of repentance--Grapes and wild grapes. - - CHAPTER XXIII - - ISAIAH AND AHAZ 265 - - Isaiah--Rezin and Pekah--Ahaz meets Isaiah--He receives a promise of - deliverance--He refuses a sign--The sign given him--Immanuel--Birth - of Messianic prophecy--Maher-shalal-hash-baz--The promised - Deliverer. - - CHAPTER XXIV - - THE APOSTASIES OF AHAZ 273 - - Moloch-worship--Sacrifice of children--Ahaz appeals to Assyria for - help--Ruin of Damascus and death of Rezin--Ahaz does homage to - Tiglath-Pileser at Damascus--Records of Tiglath-Pileser--The new - altar--Complaisance of the priest Urijah--Unpopularity of - Ahaz--Further misgivings--His death. - - CHAPTER XXV - - HEZEKIAH (B.C. 715-686) 287 - - Dates--Importance of the reign--Hezekiah's age--His character--His - reformation--Partial suppression of the _bamoth_--Removal of the - _matstseboth_ and _Asherim_--Destruction of the brazen - serpent--Trust in Jehovah--Psalm xlvi.--Chastisement of the - Philistines--Three parties in Jerusalem--1. The Assyrian party--2. - The Egyptian party--3. The national party--Its attitude to the - others--Micah--Mockery of Egypt--Anger and insults of the priests - against Isaiah--Confidence of Isaiah--Waverings of Hezekiah. - - CHAPTER XXVI - - HEZEKIAH'S SICKNESS--THE BABYLONIAN EMBASSY 305 - - The story of Hezekiah's illness misplaced--At the point of - death--Isaiah's message--The king's agony of mind--The prayer--The - reprieve--The sun-dial of Ahaz--The king's gratitude and - thanksgiving--Merodach-Baladan--Rising power of Babylon--Object of - the embassy--The king's action--The prophet's reproof--The king's - humble submission. - - CHAPTER XXVII - - HEZEKIAH AND ASSYRIA (B.C. 701) 319 - - Greatness of Sargon--His campaigns--Defeat of Egypt at the battle - of Raphia--Ashdod--Defeat of Merodach-Baladan--Grandeur of - Sennacherib--His invasion of Judæa--Earlier collisions--His - campaigns--1. Against Babylon--2. Against Elam--3. Against the - Hittites and Philistines--Defeat of the Ethiopian Tirhakah at - Altaqu--Heavy mulct imposed on Hezekiah--Siege of - Lachish--Sennacherib breaks his compact--Distress of Jerusalem. - - CHAPTER XXVIII - - THE GREAT DELIVERANCE (B.C. 701) 331 - - Embassy of the Turtan, the Rabsaris, and the Rabshakeh--Misery and - licence in the city--The conference--Oration of the Rabshakeh--Its - effect on the king's ministers and on the people--Taunting insults - of the Rabshakeh--Faithfulness and self-control of the - people--Heroic faith of Isaiah--Failure of the - embassy--Sennacherib's threatening letter--Hezekiah's - prayer--Isaiah promises deliverance in the name of Jehovah--The - sign--The angel of death--Scene of the catastrophe--The Egyptian - tradition of Sethos and the mice--Death and burial of - Hezekiah--The campaign as recorded on the Assyrian monuments--The - triumph of indomitable faith--Grandeur of Isaiah--Wane of - Assyria--Beautiful tolerance of Isaiah. - - CHAPTER XXIX - - MANASSEH (B.C. 686-641) 351 - - The name Manasseh--His tender age--Influence of evil - counsellors--Heathenising party--Their dislike of Hezekiah's - reformation and of the exclusive worship of Jehovah--Tendency to - trust in sacrifices and asceticism--Sanctification of - licence--Arguments of the heathenisers--Disparagement of the work - of Isaiah--Doubts and disbelief--Influence of the - _bamoth_-priests--Reliance on Assyria--The immoral and idolatrous - reaction--1. Restoration of the _bamoth_, and arguments in their - favour--2. Adoption of Phœnician nature-worship--3. Assyrian - Sabaism and star-worship--Connivance of the priests--4. Canaanite - Moloch-worship--5. Mesopotamian Shamanism--6. The - _Asherah_--Denunciation of the prophets--Persecution and the - shedding of innocent blood--Asserted captivity, repentance, and - reforming energy of Manasseh--Difficulties of the story--Reign of - Amon (B.C. 641-639)--Wretchedness of his reign--Zephaniah and - Jeremiah--Murder of Amon. - - CHAPTER XXX - - JOSIAH (B.C. 639-608) 374 - - Three vast movements--Jeremiah's earlier prophecies--The state of - society--The Scythians--Prophecies of Ezekiel--Herodotus--The fate - of Nineveh--Rise of the Chaldæans--Habakkuk. - - CHAPTER XXXI - - JOSIAH'S REFORMATION 385 - - Growth of Josiah's character--Repairs of the Temple--Hilkiah finds - the Book of the Law--Intense effect produced on mind of the - king--His message to the prophetess Huldah--Great - assembly--Renewal of a solemn league and covenant with - Jehovah--The _bamoth_-priests degraded--Defiling of Tophet--He - carries the reformation into Samaria--Its stringency and - severity--The Passover--Suppression of heathen - corruptions--Jeremiah's share in the reformation--Its dangers and - disappointing results--Jeremiah's warnings against all trust in - externals--The prophecy of a new covenant--NOTE TO CHAPTER XXXI.: - The Book found in the Temple. - - CHAPTER XXXII - - THE DEATH OF JOSIAH (B.C. 608) 402 - - Prosperity and happiness of Josiah--Accession of the great Pharaoh - Necho II.--His excursion against Carchemish--Josiah determines to - bar his path--Warnings of Pharaoh Necho--Disaster at Megiddo and - death of Josiah--Mistaken hopes--God's dealings with men and - nations--Distress among Josiah's subjects--The king's - burial--Misgivings respecting the future--Sorrow of - Jeremiah--Ultimate fulfilments. - - CHAPTER XXXIII - - JEHOAHAZ (B.C. 608) 411 - - Four sons of Josiah--Shallum chosen by the people of the land--Elegy - of Ezekiel--Change of name from Shallum to Jehoahaz--Conquests of - Pharaoh Necho II.--Jehoahaz summoned to Riblah--Carried captive by - Pharaoh to Egypt--Tribute imposed on Judæa. - - CHAPTER XXXIV - - JEHOIAKIM (B.C. 608-597) 416 - - Eliakim--His change of name--Ignored by Ezekiel--Evil - influences--Æsthetic selfishness and oppressive - greed--Denunciation by Habakkuk--Denunciation by Jeremiah--Murder - of Urijah--Threatened murder of Jeremiah averted by Ahikam--Fall - of Nineveh--Utterances of the prophets--Rise of the - Chaldæans--Nabopolassar--Defeat of Pharaoh Necho by - Nebuchadrezzar--His return to Babylon--His invasion of - Judæa--Beginning of the Babylonian captivity--Jehoiakim revolts to - Egypt in spite of Jeremiah's warnings--Imprisonment of - Jeremiah--Baruch--The menacing roll--Alarm of the princes--Rage of - the king--He cuts the scroll to pieces and burns it--Wretchedness - of the times--A great drought--Captives of Jerusalem--Miserable - death of Jehoiakim--"That which was found in him." - - CHAPTER XXXV - - JEHOIACHIN (B.C. 597) 431 - - Bad influence over him--His brief reign--Allusions to him by - Jeremiah at Jerusalem--Second captivity--Regret felt for - Jehoiachin--Did he die childless? - - CHAPTER XXXVI - - ZEDEKIAH, THE LAST KING OF JUDAH (B.C. 597-586) 437 - - His oath to the King of Assyria--Ezekiel's prophecies--The exiles - and the remnant--Weakness of Zedekiah--Continuance of idolatry as - described by Ezekiel--The king breaks his oath with - Assyria--Indignation and warnings of Jeremiah--The false prophet - Hananiah--The wooden and iron yokes--Death of Hananiah--False - prophets--The broken covenant--Advance of - Nebuchadrezzar--Belomancy and Babylonian divinations--Siege of - Jerusalem--Gloom of Jeremiah's prophecies. - - CHAPTER XXXVII - - JEREMIAH AND HIS PROPHECIES 449 - - Pathos of Jeremiah's lot--The sad epoch in which he - lived--Religious changes--Arrest of Jeremiah--Progress of the - siege--Zedekiah sends for the prophet--His hardships - alleviated--Horrors of famine--Wicked defiance--A sudden - death--Anger of the priests and nobles against Jeremiah--He is - thrust into a miry pit--Compassion of Ebed-Melech--Purchase of a - field at Anathoth--Secret interview with Zedekiah--It becomes - known--Distress of Zedekiah. - - CHAPTER XXXVIII - - THE FALL OF JERUSALEM (B.C. 586) 457 - - Nebuzaradan and the Babylonians--The final captivity--Dreadful - fate of Zedekiah--Prophecies of Ezekiel and Jeremiah--Sack of the - city--Massacre of the chief inhabitants--Burning of the city and - Temple--Desolation--Respect shown by the Babylonian general to - Jeremiah--He decides to remain with the remnant in Judæa. - - CHAPTER XXXIX - - GEDALIAH (B.C. 586) 465 - - Sad parting from the exiles--The wail at Ramah--Gedaliah's - appointment as satrap perhaps due to Jeremiah--Desolation of - Jerusalem--The seat of government removed to Mizpah--A respite and - a gleam of hope--Guerilla bands--Johanan warns Gedaliah against - Ishmael--Unsuspecting generosity of the governor--He receives - Ishmael and his confederates with hospitality--He is brutally - murdered--Massacre of the pilgrims from Shiloh--The horrible - well--Johanan pursues Ishmael--His escape--Proposal to migrate to - Egypt--Jeremiah consulted--His advice refused--Prophecy of - Jeremiah at the khan of Chimham--Kindness shown by Evil-Merodach - to Jehoiachin. - - EPILOGUE 477 - - The interest of the preceding history and the great moral lessons - which it involves--The central conceptions of Hebrew prophecy--The - end of the whole matter. - - APPENDIX I - - THE KINGS OF ASSYRIA, AND SOME OF THEIR INSCRIPTIONS 487 - - APPENDIX II - - INSCRIPTION IN THE TUNNEL OF THE POOL OF SILOAM 493 - - APPENDIX III - - WAS THERE A GOLDEN CALF AT DAN? 494 - - APPENDIX IV - - DATES OF THE KINGS OF ISRAEL AND JUDAH, AS GIVEN BY KITTEL AND - OTHER MODERN CRITICS 495 - - - - - THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS - - - - -"Theories of inspiration which impaginate the Everlasting Spirit, and -make each verse a cluster of objectless and mechanical miracles, are -not seriously believed by any one: the Bible itself abides in its -endless power and unexhausted truth. All that is not of asbestos is -being burned away by the restless fires of thought and criticism. That -which remains is enough, and it is indestructible."--BISHOP OF DERRY. - - - - - CHAPTER I - - _AHAZIAH BEN-AHAB OF ISRAEL_ - - B.C. 855-854 - - 2 KINGS i. 1-18 - - "Ye know not of what spirit are ye."--LUKE ix. 55. - - "He is the mediator of a better covenant, which hath been enacted - upon better promises."--HEB. viii. 6. - - -Ahaziah, the eldest son and successor of Ahab, has been called "the most -shadowy of the Israelitish kings."[1] He seems to have been in all -respects one of the most weak, faithless, and deplorably miserable. He -did but reign two years--perhaps in reality little more than one; but -this brief space was crowded with intolerable disasters. Everything that -he touched seemed to be marked out for ruin or failure, and in character -he showed himself a true son of Jezebel and Ahab. - -What results followed the defeat of Ahab and Jehoshaphat at -Ramoth-Gilead we are not told. The war must have ended in terms of -peace of some kind--perhaps in the cession of Ramoth-Gilead; for -Ahaziah does not seem to have been disturbed during his brief reign by -any Syrian invasion. Nor were there any troubles on the side of Judah. -Ahaziah's sister was the wife of Jehoshaphat's heir, and the good -understanding between the two kingdoms was so closely cemented, that -in both royal houses there was an identity of names--two Ahaziahs and -two Jehorams. - -But even the Judæan alliance was marked with misfortune. Jehoshaphat's -prosperity and ambition, together with his firm dominance over -Edom--in which country he had appointed a vassal, who was sometimes -allowed the courtesy title of king[2]--led him to emulate Solomon by -an attempt to revive the old maritime enterprise which had astonished -Jerusalem with ivory, and apes, and peacocks imported from India. He -therefore built "ships of Tarshish" at Ezion-Geber to sail to Ophir. -They were called "Tarshish-ships," because they were of the same build -as those which sailed to Tartessus, in Spain, from Joppa. Ahaziah was -to some extent associated with him in the enterprise. But it turned -out even more disastrously than it had done in former times. So -unskilled was the seamanship of those days among all nations except -the Phœnicians, that the whole fleet was wrecked and shattered to -pieces in the very harbour of Ezion-Geber before it had set sail. - -Ahaziah, whose affinity with the King of Tyre and possession of some -of the western ports had given his subjects more knowledge of ships -and voyages, then proposed to Jehoshaphat that the vessels should be -manned with sailors from Israel as well as Judah. But Jehoshaphat was -tired of a futile and expensive effort. He refused a partnership which -might easily lead to complications, and on which the prophets of -Jehovah frowned. It was the last attempt made by the Israelites to -become merchants by sea as well as by land. - -Ahaziah's brief reign was marked by one immense humiliation. David, who -extended the dominion of the Hebrews in all directions, had smitten the -Moabites, and inflicted on them one of the horrible atrocities against -which the ill-instructed conscience of men in those days of ignorance -did not revolt.[3] He had made the male warriors lie on the ground, and -then, measuring them by lines, he put every two lines to death and kept -one alive. After this the Moabites had continued to be tributaries. They -had fallen to the share of the Northern Kingdom, and yearly acknowledged -the suzerainty of Israel by paying a heavy tribute of the fleeces of a -hundred thousand lambs and a hundred thousand rams. But now that the -warrior Ahab was dead, and Israel had been crushed by the catastrophe at -Ramoth-Gilead, Mesha, the energetic viceroy of Moab, seized his -opportunity to revolt and to break from the neck of his people the -odious yoke. The revolt was entirely successful. The sacred historian -gives us no details, but one of the most priceless of modern -archæological discoveries has confirmed the Scriptural reference by -securing and translating a fragment of Mesha's own account of the -annals of his reign. We have, in what is called "The Moabite Stone," the -memorial written in glorification of himself and of his god Chemosh, -"the abomination of the children of Ammon," by a contemporary of Ahab -and Jehoshaphat.[4] It is the oldest specimen which we possess of Hebrew -writing; perhaps the only specimen, except the Siloam inscription, which -has come down to us from before the date of the Exile. It was discovered -in 1878 by the German missionary Klein, amid the ruins of the royal city -of Daibon (Dibon, Num. xxi. 30), and was purchased for the Berlin Museum -in 1879. Owing to all kinds of errors and intrigues, it did not remain -in the hands of its purchaser, but was broken into fragments by the -nomad tribe of Beni Hamide, from whom it was in some way obtained by M. -Clermont-Ganneau. There is no ground for questioning its perfect -genuineness, though the discovery of its value led to the forgery of a -number of spurious and often indecent inscriptions. There can be no -reasonable doubt that when we look at it we see before us the identical -memorial of triumph which the Moabite emîr erected in the days of -Ahaziah on the _bamah_ of Chemosh at Dibon, one of his chief towns. - -This document is supremely interesting, not only for its historical -allusions, but also as an illustration of customs and modes of thought -which have left their traces in the records of the people of Jehovah, -as well as in those of the people of Chemosh.[5] Mesha tells us that -his father reigned in Dibon for thirty years, and that he succeeded. -He reared this stone to Chemosh in the town of Karcha, as a memorial -of gratitude for the assistance which had resulted in the overthrow of -all his enemies. Omri, King of Israel, had oppressed Moab many days, -because Chemosh was wroth with his people. Ahaziah wished to oppress -Moab as his father had done. But Chemosh enabled Mesha to recover -Medeba, and afterwards Baal-Meon, Kirjatan, Ataroth, Nebo, and Jahaz, -which he reoccupied and rebuilt. Perhaps they had been practically -abandoned by all effective Israelite garrisons. In some of these towns -he put the inhabitants under a ban, and sacrificed them to Moloch in a -great slaughter. In Nebo alone he slew seven thousand men. Having -turned many towns into fortresses, he was enabled to defy Israel -altogether, to refuse the old burdensome tribute, and to re-establish -a strong Moabite kingdom east of the Dead Sea; for Israel was wholly -unable to meet his forces in the open field. Month after month of the -reign of the miserable son of Ahab must have been marked by tidings of -shame, defeat, and massacre. - -Added to these public calamities, there came to Ahaziah a terrible -personal misfortune. As he was coming down from the roof of his -palace, he seems to have stopped to lean against the lattice of some -window or balcony in his upper chamber in Samaria.[6] It gave way -under his weight, and he was hurled down into the courtyard or street -below. He was so seriously hurt that he spent the rest of his reign on -a sick-bed in pain and weakness, and ultimately died of the injuries -he had received. - -A succession of woes so grievous might well have awakened the wretched -king to serious thought. But he had been trained under the idolatrous -influences of his mother. As though it were not enough for him to walk -in the steps of Ahab, of Jezebel, and of Jeroboam, he had the fatuity to -go out of his way to patronise another and yet more odious superstition. -Ekron was the nearest town to him of the Philistine Pentapolis, and at -Ekron was established the local cult of a particular Baal known as -Baal-Zebub ("the lord of flies").[7] Flies, which in temperate countries -are sometimes an intense annoyance, become in tropical climates an -intolerable plague. Even the Greeks had their Zeus Apomuios ("Zeus the -averter of flies"), and some Greek tribes worshipped Zeus Ipuktonos -("Zeus the slayer of vermin"), and Zeus Muiagros and Apomuios, and -Apollo Smintheus ("the destroyer of mice").[8] The Romans, too, among -the numberless quaint heroes of their Pantheon, had a certain Myiagrus -and Myiodes, whose function it was to keep flies at a distance.[9] This -fly-god, Baal-Zebub of Ekron, had an oracle, to whose lying responses -the young and superstitious prince attached implicit credence. That a -king of Israel professing any sort of allegiance to Jehovah, and having -hundreds of prophets in his own kingdom, should send an embassy to the -shrine of an abominable local divinity in a town of the -Philistines--whose chief object of worship was - - "That twice-battered god of Palestine, - Who mourned in earnest when the captive ark - Maimed his brute image on the grunsel edge - Where he fell flat, and shamed his worshippers"-- - -was, it must be admitted, an act of apostasy more outrageously -insulting than had ever yet been perpetrated by any Hebrew king. -Nothing can more clearly illustrate the callous indifference shown by -the race of Jezebel to the lessons which God had so decisively taught -them by Elijah and by Micaiah. - -But - - _Quem vult Deus perire, dementat prius_; - -and in this "dementation preceding doom" Ahaziah sent to ask the -fly-god's oracle whether he should recover of his injury. His -infatuated perversity became known to Elijah, who was bidden by "the -angel," or messenger, "of the Lord"--which may only be the recognised -phrase in the prophetic schools, putting in a concrete and vivid form -the voice of inward inspiration--to go up, apparently on the road -towards Samaria, and meet the messengers of Ahaziah on their way to -Ekron. Where Elijah was at the time we do not know. Ten years had -elapsed since the calling of Elisha, and four since Elijah had -confronted Ahab at the door of Naboth's vineyard. In the interval he -has not once been mentioned, nor can we conjecture with the least -certainty whether he had been living in congenial solitude or had -been helping to train the Sons of the Prophets in the high duties of -their calling. Why he had not appeared to support Micaiah we cannot -tell. Now, at any rate, the son of Ahab was drawing upon himself an -ancient curse by going a-whoring after wizards and familiar spirits, -and it was high time for Elijah to interfere.[10] - -The messengers had not proceeded far on their way when the prophet met -them, and sternly bade them go back to their king, with the -denunciation, "Is it because there is no God in Israel that ye go to -inquire of Baal-Zebub, the god of Ekron? Now, therefore, thus saith -Jehovah, 'Thou shalt not descend from that bed on which thou art gone -up, but dying thou shalt die.'" - -He spoke, and after his manner vanished with no less suddenness. - -The messengers, overawed by that startling apparition, did not dream -of daring to disobey. They at once went back to the king, who, -astonished at their reappearance before they could possibly have -reached the oracle, asked them why they had returned. - -They told him of the apparition by which they had been confronted. -That it was a prophet who had spoken to them they knew; but the -appearances of Elijah had been so few, and at such long intervals, -that they knew not who he was. - -"What sort of man was he that spoke to you?" asked the king. - -"He was," they answered, "a lord of hair,[11] and girded about his -loins with a girdle of skin."[12] - -Too well did Ahaziah recognise from this description the enemy of his -guilty race! If he had not been present on Carmel, or at Jezreel, on -the occasions when that swart and shaggy figure of the awful Wanderer -had confronted his father, he must have often heard descriptions of -this strange Bedawy ascetic who "feared man so little because he -feared God so much." - -"It is Elijah the Tishbite!" he exclaimed, with a bitterness which was -succeeded by fierce wrath; and with something of his mother's -indomitable rage he sent a captain with fifty soldiers to arrest him. - -The captain found Elijah sitting at the top of "the hill," perhaps of -Carmel; and what followed is thus described:-- - -"Thou man of God," he cried, "the king hath said, Come down." - -There was something strangely incongruous in this rude address. The -title "man of God" seems first to have been currently given to Elijah, -and it recognises his inspired mission as well as the supernatural -power which he was believed to wield. How preposterous, then, was it -to bid a man of God to obey a king's order and to give himself up to -imprisonment or death! - -"If I be a man of God," said Elijah, "then let fire come down from -heaven, to consume thee and thy fifty."[13] - -The fire fell and reduced them all to ashes.[14] - -Undeterred by so tremendous a consummation, the king sent another -captain with his fifty, who repeated the order in terms yet more -imperative.[15] - -Again Elijah called down the fire from heaven, and the second captain -with his fifty soldiers was reduced to ashes. - -For the third time the obstinate king, whose infatuation must indeed -have been transcendent, despatched a captain with his fifty. But he, -warned by the fate of his predecessors, went up to Elijah and fell on -his knees, and implored him to spare the life of himself and his fifty -innocent soldiers. - -Then "the angel of the Lord" bade Elijah go down to the king with him -and not be afraid. - -What are we to think of this narrative? - -Of course, if we are to judge it on such moral grounds as we learn from -the spirit of the Gospel, Christ Himself has taught us to condemn it. -There have been men who so hideously misunderstood the true lessons of -revelation as to applaud such deeds, and hold them up for modern -imitation. The dark persecutors of the Spanish Inquisition, nay, even -men like Calvin and Beza, argued from this scene that "fire is the -proper instrument for the punishment of heretics." To all who have been -thus misled by a false and superstitious theory of inspiration, Christ -Himself says, with unmistakable plainness, as He said to the Sons of -Thunder at Engannim, "Ye know not what spirit ye are of. I am not come -to destroy men's lives, but to save."[16] In the abstract, and judged by -Christian standards, the calling down of lightning to consume more than -a hundred soldiers, who were but obeying the orders of a king--the -protection of personal safety by the miraculous destruction of a king's -messengers--could only be regarded as a deed of horror. "There are few -tracks of Elijah that are ordinary and fit for common feet," says Bishop -Hall; and he adds, "Not in his own defence would the prophet have been -the death of so many, if God had not, by a peculiar instinct, made him -an instrument of His just vengeance."[17] - -For myself, I more than doubt whether we have any right to appeal to -these "peculiar instincts" and unrecorded inspirations; and it is so -important that we should not form utterly false views of what -Scripture does and does not teach, that we must once more deal with -this narrative quite plainly, and not beat about the bush with the -untenable devices and effeminate euphemisms of commentators, who give -us the "to-and-fro-conflicting" apologies of _a priori_ theory instead -of the clear judgments of inflexible morality. - -"It is impossible not to feel," says Professor Milligan,[18] "that the -events thus presented to us are of a very startling kind, and that it -is not easy to reconcile them either with the conception that we form -of an honoured servant of God, or with our ideas of eternal justice. -Elijah rather appears to us at first sight as a proud, arrogant, and -merciless wielder of the power committed to him: we wonder that an -answer should have been given to his prayer; we are shocked at the -destruction of so many men, who listened only to the command of their -captain and their king; and we cannot help contrasting Elijah's -conduct, as a whole, with the beneficent and loving tenderness of the -New Testament dispensation." - -Professor Milligan proceeds rightly to set aside the attempts which -have been made to represent the first two captains and their fifties -as especially guilty--which is a most flimsy hypothesis, and would not -in any case touch the heart of the matter. He says that the event -stands on exactly the same footing as the slaughter of the 450 -prophets of Baal at Kishon, and of the 3000 idolaters by order of -Moses at Sinai; the swallowing up of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram; the -ban of total extirpation on Jericho and on Canaan; the sweeping -massacre of the Amalekites by Saul; and many similar instances of -recorded savagery. But the reference to analogous acts furnishes no -justification for those acts. What, then, is their justification, if -any can be found? - -Some would defend them on the grounds that the potter may do what he -likes with the clay. That analogy, though perfectly admissible when -used for the purpose to which it is applied by St. Paul, is grossly -inapplicable to such cases as this. St. Paul uses it simply to prove -that we cannot judge or understand the purposes of God, in which, as -he shows, mercy often lies behind apparent severity. But, when urged -to maintain the rectitude of sweeping judgments in which a man arms -his own feebleness with the omnipotence of Heaven, they amount to no -more than the tyrant's plea that "might makes right." "Man is a reed," -said Pascal, "but he is a _thinking_ reed." He may not therefore be -indiscriminately crushed. He was made by God in His image, after His -likeness, and therefore his rights have a Divine and indefeasible -sanction. - -All that can be said is that these deeds of wholesale severity were -not in disaccord with the conscience even of many of the best Old -Testament saints. They did not feel the least compunction in -inflicting judgments on whole populations in a way which would argue -in us an infamous callousness. Nay, their consciences approved of -those deeds; they were but acting up to the standard of their times, -and they regarded themselves as righteous instruments of divinely -directed vengeance.[19] Take, for instance, the frightful Eastern law -which among the Jews no less than among Babylonians and Persians -thought nothing of overwhelming the innocent with the guilty in the -same catastrophe; which required the stoning, not only of Achan, but -of all Achan's innocent family, as an expiation for his theft; and the -stoning, not only of Naboth, but also of Naboth's sons, in requital -for his asserted blasphemy. Two reasons may be assigned for the chasm -between their moral sense and ours on such subjects--one was their -amazing indifference to the sacredness of human life, and the other -their invariable habit of regarding men in their corporate relations -rather than in their individual capacity. Our conscience teaches us -that to slay the innocent with the guilty is an action of monstrous -injustice;[20] but they, regarding each person as indissolubly mixed -up with all his family and tribe, magnified the conception of -_corporate responsibility_, and merged the individual in the mass. - -It is clear that, if we take the narrative literally, Elijah would not -have felt the least remorse in calling fire from heaven to consume these -scores of soldiers, because the prophetic narrator who recorded the -story, perhaps two centuries later, must have understood the spirit of -those days, and certainly felt no shame for the prophet's act of -vengeance. On the contrary, he relates it with entire approval for the -glorification of his hero. We cannot blame him for not rising above the -moral standard of his age. He held that the natural manifestation of an -angry Jehovah was, literally or metaphorically, in consuming fire. -Considering the slow education of mankind in the most elementary -principles of mercy and righteousness, we must not judge the views of -prophets who lived so many ages before Christ by those of religious -teachers who enjoy the inherited experience of two millenniums of -Christianity. Thus much is plainly taught us by Christ Himself, and -there perhaps we might be content to leave the question. But we are -compelled to ask, Do we not too much form all our judgments of the -Scripture narratives on _a priori_ traditions and unreasoned prejudices? -Can we with adequate knowledge and honest conviction declare our -certainty that this scene of destruction ever occurred as a literal -fact? If we turn to any of the great students and critics of Germany, to -whom we are indebted for the floods of light which their researches have -thrown on the sacred page, they with almost consentient voice regard -these details of this story as legendary. There is indeed every reason -to believe the account of Ahaziah's accident, of his sending to consult -the oracle of Baal-Zebub, of the turning back of his messengers by -Elijah, and of the menace which he heard from the prophet's lips. But -the calling down of lightning to consume his captains and soldiers to -ashes belongs to the cycle of Elijah-traditions preserved in the schools -of the prophets; and in the case of miracles so startling and to our -moral sense so repellent--miracles which assume the most insensate folly -on the part of the king, and the most callous ruthlessness on the part -of the prophet--the question may be fairly asked, Is there any proof, is -there anything beyond dogmatic assertion to convince us, that we were -intended to accept them _au pied de la lettre_? May they not be the -formal vehicle chosen for the illustration of the undoubted powers and -righteous mission of Elijah as the upholder of the worship of Jehovah? -In a literature which abounds, as all Eastern literature abounds, in -vivid and concrete methods of indicating abstract truths, have we any -cogent proof that the supernatural details, of which some may have been -introduced into these narratives by the scribes in the schools of the -prophets, were not, in some instances, _meant_ to be regarded as -imaginative apologues? The most orthodox divines, both Jewish and -Christian, have not hesitated to treat the Book of Jonah as an instance -of the use of fiction for purposes of moral and spiritual edification. -Were any critic to maintain that the story of the destruction of -Ahaziah's emissaries belongs to the same class of narratives, I do not -know how he could be refuted, however much he might be denounced by -stereotyped prejudice and ignorance. I do not, however, myself regard -the story as a mere parable composed to show how awful was the power of -the prophets, and how fearfully it might be exercised. I look upon it -rather as possibly the narrative of some event which has been -imaginatively embellished, and intermingled with details which we call -supernatural.[21] Circumstances which we consider natural would be -regarded as directly miraculous by an Eastern enthusiast, who saw in -every event the immediate act of Jehovah to the exclusion of all -secondary causes, and who attributed every occurrence of life to the -intervention of those "millions of spiritual creatures," who - - "walk the earth - Unseen both when we wake and when we sleep." - -If such a supposition be correct and admissible--and assuredly it is -based on all that we increasingly learn of the methods of Eastern -literature, and of the forms in which religious ideas were inculcated -in early ages--then all difficulties are removed. We are not dealing -with the mercilessness of a prophet, or the wielding of Divine powers -in a manner which higher revelation condemns, but only with the -well-known fact that the Elijah-spirit was not the Christ-spirit, and -that the scribes of Ramah or Gilgal, and "the men of the tradition" -and the "men of letters" who lived at Jabez, when they used the -methods of Targum and Haggadah in handing down the stories of the -prophets, had not received that full measure of enlightenment which -came only when the Light of the World had shone.[22] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[1] Rawlinson, _Kings of Israel and Judah_, p. 86. "The name of -Ahaziah ('the Lord taketh hold'), like that of all Ahab's sons, -testifies to the fact that the husband of Jezebel still worshipped -Jehovah. Among the names of the judges and kings before Ahab in -Israel, and Asa in Judah, scarcely a single instance occurs of names -compounded with Jehovah; thenceforward they became the rule" -(Wellhausen, _Israel and Judah_, Es. 1, p. 66). - -[2] 1 Kings xxii. 47; 2 Kings iii. 9: comp. viii. 20. - -[3] 2 Sam. viii. 2. On the ethics of these wars of extermination, such -as are commanded in the Pentateuch, and were practised by Joshua, -Samuel, Saul, David, and others, see Josh. vi. 17; 1 Sam. xv. 3, 33; 2 -Sam. viii. 2, etc., and Mozley's _Lectures on the Old Testament_, pp. -83-103. - -[4] See Stade, i. 86. He gives a photograph and translation of it at -p. 534. - -[5] See _Records of the Past_, xi. 166, 167. - -[6] 2 Kings i. 2; Heb., _be'ad hass'bakāh_; LXX., διὰ τοῦ δικτυωτοῦ; -Vulg., _per cancellos_ (comp. 1 Kings vii. 18; 2 Chron. iv. 12). - -[7] LXX., Βάαλ μυῖαν θεὸν Ἀκκαρών. So, too, Jos., _Antt._, IX. ii. 1. -It is possible that the god was represented holding a fly as the type -of pestilence, just as the statue of Pthah held in its hands a mouse -(Herod., ii. 141). Flies convey all kinds of contagion (Plin., _H. -N._, x. 28). - -[8] Pausan., v. 14, § 2. - -[9] The name, or a derisive modification of it, was given by the Jews -in the days of Christ to the prince of the devils. In Matt. xii. 24 -the true reading is Βεελζεβούλ, which perhaps means (in contempt) "the -lord of dung"; but might mean "the lord of the [celestial] habitation" -(οἰκοδεσπότην). Comp. Matt. x. 25; Eph. ii. 2; "Baal Shamaim," the -Belsamen of Augustine (Gesen., _Monum. Phœnic._, 387; Movers, -_Phönizier_, i. 176). For "opprobrious puns" applied to idols, see -Lightfoot, _Exercitationes ad Matt._, xii. 24. The common word for -idols, _gilloolim_, is perhaps connected with _galal_, "dung." Hitzig -thinks that the god was represented under the symbol of the _Scarabæus -pillularius_, or dung-beetle. - -[10] Lev. xx. 6. - -[11] שֵׂצַר בַּאַל (LXX., δασύς), whether in reference to his long -shaggy locks, or his sheepskin _addereth_, μηλωτή (Zech. xiii. 4; Heb. -xii. 37). - -[12] ζώνη δερματίνη (Matt iii. 4). - -[13] There is perhaps an intentional play of words between "man (אישׁ) -of God" and "fire (אשׁ) of God" (Klostermann). - -[14] Hebrew. - -[15] "Come down _quickly_" (2 Kings i. 9). - -[16] Luke ix. 51-56. This is a more than sufficient answer to the -censure of Theodoret, that "they who condemn the prophet are wagging -their tongues against God." The remark is based on utter -misapprehension; and if we are to form no judgment on the morality of -Scripture examples, they would be of no help for us. Compare the -striking remark of the minister to Balfour of Burleigh in Scott's _Old -Mortality_. - -[17] Quoted by Rev. Professor Lumby, _ad loc._ - -[18] _Elijah_, p. 146. - -[19] This is practically the sum-total of the answer given again and -again by Canon Mozley in his _Lectures on the Old Testament_, 2nd -edition, 1878. For instance, he says that "the Jewish idea of justice -gives us the reason why the Divine commands (of exterminating wars, -etc.) were then adapted to man as the agent for executing them, and -are not adapted now" (p. 102). - -[20] Comp. Ezek. xviii. 2-30. - -[21] For the _idea_ involved see Num. xi. 1; Deut. iv. 24; Psalm xxi. -9; Isa. xxvi. 11; Heb. x. 27, etc. - -[22] 1 Chron. ii. 55, where "Shimeathites" means "men of the -tradition," and "scribes," "men of letters." - - - - - CHAPTER II - - _THE ASCENSION OF ELIJAH_ - - 2 KINGS ii. 1-18 - - Ἠλίας ἐξ ἀνθρώπων ἠφανίσθη, καὶ οὐδεὶς ἔγνω μεχρὶς τῆς σήμερον - αὐτοῦ τὴν τελεύτην.--JOS., _Antt._, IX. ii. 2. - - Γεγόνασιν ἀφανεῖς, θάνατον δὲ αὐτῶν οὐδεὶς οἶδεν.--ST. EPHRÆM - SYRUS. - - -The date of the assumption of Elijah is wholly uncertain, and it -becomes still more so because of the confusion of chronological order -which results from the composite character of the records here -collected. It appears from various scattered notices that Elijah lived -on till the reign of Jehoram of Judah, whereas the narrative in this -chapter is placed before the death of Jehoshaphat. - -When the time came that "Jehovah would take up Elijah by a whirlwind -into heaven," the prophet had a prevision of his approaching end, and -determined for the last time to visit the hills of his native Gilead. -The story of his end, though not written in rhythm, is told in a style -of the loftiest poetry, resembling other ancient poems in its simple -and solemn repetitions. On his way to Gilead, Elijah desires to visit -ancient sanctuaries where schools of the prophets were now -established, and accompanied by Elisha, whose faithful ministrations -he had enjoyed for ten almost silent years, he went to Gilgal. This -was not the Gilgal in the Jordan valley so famous in the days of -Joshua,[23] but _Jiljilia_ in the hills of Ephraim,[24] where many -young prophets were in course of training.[25] - -Knowing that he was on his way to death, Elijah felt the imperious -instinct which leads the soul to seek solitude at the supreme crises -of life. He would have preferred that even Elisha should leave him, -and he bade him stop at Gilgal, because the Lord had sent him as far -as Bethel. But Elisha was determined to see the end, and exclaimed -with strong asseveration, "As Jehovah liveth, and as thy soul liveth, -I will not leave thee." - -So they went on to Bethel, where there was another school of prophets, -under the immediate shadow of Jeroboam's golden calf, though we are -not told whether they continued the protest of the old nameless seer -from Judah, or not.[26] Here the youths of the college came -respectfully to Elisha--for they were prevented by a sense of awe from -addressing Elijah--and asked him "whether he knew that that day God -would take away his master." "Yes, I know it," he answers; but--for -this is no subject for idle talk--"hold ye your peace." - -Once more Elijah tries to shake off the attendance of his friend and -disciple. He bids him stay at Bethel, since Jehovah has sent him on to -Jericho. Once more Elisha repeats his oath that he will not leave -him, and once more the sons of the prophets at Jericho, who warn him -of what is coming, are told to say no more. - -But little of the journey now remains. In vain Elijah urges Elisha to -stay at Jericho; they proceed to Jordan. Conscious that some great -event is impending, and that Elijah is leaving these scenes for ever, -fifty of the sons of the prophets watch the two as they descend the -valley to the river. Here they saw Elijah take off his mantle of hair, -roll it up, and smite the waters with it. The waters part asunder, and -the prophets pass over dry-shod.[27] As they crossed over Elijah asks -Elisha what he should do for him, and Elisha entreats that a double -portion of Elijah's spirit may rest upon him. By this he does not mean -to ask for twice Elijah's power and inspiration, but only for an elder -son's portion, which was twice what was inherited by the younger -sons.[28] "Thou hast asked a hard thing," said Elijah; "but if thou -seest me when I am taken hence, it shall be so." - -The sequel can be only told in the words of the text: "And it came to -pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared -a chariot of fire, and horses of fire,[29] and parted them both -asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven. And Elisha saw -it, and he cried, 'My father, my father, the chariots of Israel, and -the horsemen thereof!'[30] And he saw him no more." - -Respecting the manner in which Elijah ended his earthly career, we -know nothing beyond what is conveyed by this splendid narrative. His -death, like that of Moses, was surrounded by mystery and miracles, and -we can say nothing further about it. The question must still remain -unanswered for many minds whether it was intended by the prophetic -annalists for literal history, for spiritual allegory, or for actual -events bathed in the colourings of an imagination to which the -providential assumed the aspect of the supernatural.[31] We are twice -told that "Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven,"[32] and in that -storm--which would have seemed a fit scene for the close of a career -of storm--God, in the high poetry of the Psalmist, may have made the -winds His angels, and the flames of fire His ministers. For us it must -suffice to say of Elijah, as the Book of Genesis says of Enoch, that -"he was not, for God took him." - -Elisha signalised the removal of his master by a burst of natural -grief. He seized his garments and rent them in twain. Elijah had -dropped his mantle of skin, and his grieving disciple took it with him -as a priceless relic.[33] The legendary St. Antony bequeathed to St. -Athanasius the only thing which he had, his sheepskin mantle; and in -the mantle of Elijah his successor inherited his most characteristic -and almost his sole possession. He returned to Jordan, and with this -mantle he smote the waters as Elijah had done. At first they did not -divide;[34] but when he exclaimed, "Where is the Lord, the God of -Elijah, even He?" they parted hither and thither. Seeing the portent, -the sons of the prophets came with humble prostrations, and -acknowledged him as their new leader. - -They were not, however, satisfied with what they had seen, or had -heard from Elisha, of the departure of the great prophet, and begged -leave to send fifty strong men to search whether the wind of the Lord -had not swept him away to some mountain or valley. Elisha at first -refused, but afterwards yielded to their persistent importunity. They -searched for three days among the hills of Gilead, but found him not, -either living or dead, as Elisha had warned them would be the case. - -From that time forward Elijah has taken his place in all Jewish and -Mohammedan legends as the mysterious and deathless wanderer. Malachi -spoke of him as destined to appear again to herald the coming of the -Messiah,[35] and Christ taught His disciples that John the Baptist had -come in the spirit and power of Elijah. In Jewish legend he often -appears and disappears. A chair is set for him at the circumcision of -every Jewish child. At the Paschal feast the door is set open for him -to enter. All doubtful questions are left for decision until he comes -again. To the Mohammedans he is known as the wonder-working and awful -El Khudr.[36] - -Elisha is mentioned but once in all the later books of Scripture; but -Elijah is mentioned many times, and the son of Sirach sums up his -greatness when he says: "Then stood up Elias as fire, and his word -burned like a torch. O Elias, how wast thou honoured in thy wondrous -deeds! and who may glory like unto thee--who anointed kings to take -revenge, and prophets to succeed after him--who wast ordained for -reproof in their times, to pacify the wrath of the Lord's judgment -before it broke forth into fury, and to turn the heart of the father -unto the son, and to restore the tribes of Jacob! Blessed are they -that saw thee and slept in love; for we shall surely live!" - -FOOTNOTES: - -[23] Josh. iv. 19; v. 9, 10. - -[24] Deut. xi. 30. It is on a hill south-west of Shiloh (_Seilun_), -near the road to Jericho (Hos. iv. 15; Amos iv. 4). The name means "a -circle," and there may have been an ancient circle of sacred stones -there. - -[25] 2 Kings iv. 38. - -[26] 1 Kings xiii. - -[27] As there are fords at Jericho, the object of this miracle, as of -the one subsequently ascribed to Elisha, is not self-evident. Nothing -is more certain than that there is a Divine economy in the exercise of -supernatural powers. The pomp and prodigality of superfluous portents -belong, not to Scripture, but to the _Acta sanctorum_, and the -saint-stories of Arabia and India. - -[28] Deut. xxi. 17. The Hebrew is פִּי־שְׁנַיִם, "a mouthful, or -ration of two." Comp. Gen. xliii. 34. Even Ewald's "_Nur Zweidrittel -und auch diese kaum_" is too strong (_Gesch._, iii. 517). In no sense -was Elisha greater than Elijah: he wrought more wonders, but he left -little of his teaching, and produced on the mind of his nation a far -less strong impression. - -[29] In 2 Kings vi. 17 the stormblast (_sā'ārāh_) and chariots and -horses of fire are part of a vision of the Divine protection. Comp. -Isa. lxvi. 15; Job xxxviii, 1; Nah. i. 3; Psalms xviii. 6-15, civ. 3. - -[30] That is, the protection and defence of Israel by thy prayers. - -[31] Even the Church-father St. Ephræm Syrus evidently felt some -misgivings. He says: "Suddenly there came from the height a storm of -fire, and in the midst of the flame the form of a chariot and horses, -and parted them both asunder; the one of them it left on the earth, the -other it carried to the height; but whether the wind carried him, or in -what place it left him, the Scripture has not informed us, but it says -that after some years, a terrifying letter from him full of menaces, was -delivered to King Jehoram of Judah" (quoted by Keil _ad loc._). See 2 -Chron. xxi. 12. The letter is called "a writing" (_miktâb_). - -[32] 2 Kings ii. 11; Ecclus. xlviii. 12. The LXX. curiously says ἐν -συσσεισμῷ ὡς εἰς τὸν οὐρανόν. So too the Rabbis, _Sucah_, f. 5. - -[33] The circumstance has left its trace in the proverbs of nations, -and in the German word _Mantelkind_ for a spiritual successor. - -[34] 2 Kings ii. 14. LXX., καὶ οὐ διῃρέθη; Vulg., _Percussit aquas, et -non sunt divisæ_. - -[35] Mal. iv. 4-6. - -[36] _Bava-Metzia_, f. 37, 2, etc. His name is used for incantations in -the Kabbala. _Kitsur Sh'lh_, f. 71, 1 (Hershon, _Talmudic Miscellany_, -p. 340). The chair set for him is called "the throne of Elijah." For -many Rabbinic legends see Hershon, _Treasures of the Talmud_, pp. -172-178. The Persians regard him as the teacher of Zoroaster. - - - - - CHAPTER III - - _ELISHA_ - - 2 KINGS ii. 1-25 - - "He did wonders in his life, and at death even his works were - marvellous. For all this the people repented not."--ECCLUS. - xlviii. 14, 15. - - -At this point we enter into the cycle of supernatural stories, which -gathered round the name of Elisha in the prophetic communities. Some of -them are full of charm and tenderness; but in some cases it is difficult -to point out their intrinsic superiority over the ecclesiastical -miracles with which monkish historians have embellished the lives of the -saints. We can but narrate them as they stand, for we possess none of -the means for critical or historical analysis which might enable us to -discriminate between essential facts and accidental elements. - -We see at once that the figure of Elisha[37] is far less impressive -than that of Elijah. He inspires less of awe and terror. He lives far -more in cities and amid the ordinary surroundings of civilised life. -The honour with which he was treated was the honour of respect and -admiration for his kindliness. He plays his part in no stupendous -scenes like those at Carmel and at Horeb, and nearly all his miracles -were miracles of mercy. Other remarkable differences are observable -in the records of Elijah and Elisha. In the case of the former his -main work was the opposition to Baal-worship; but although -Baal-worship still prevailed (2 Kings x. 18-27) we read of no protests -raised by Elisha against it. "With him"--perhaps it should be more -accurately said, in the narrative which tells us of him--"the miracles -are everything, the prophetic work nothing." The conception of a -prophet's mission in these stories of him differs widely from that -which dominates the splendid _midrash_ of Elijah. - -His separate career began with an act of beneficence. He had stopped for -a time at Jericho. The curse of the rebuilding of the town upon a site -which Joshua had devoted to the ban had expended itself on Hiel, its -builder. It was now a flourishing city, and the home of a large school -of prophets. But though the situation was pleasant as "a garden of the -Lord,"[38] the water was bad, and the land "miscarried." In other words, -the deleterious spring caused diseases among the inhabitants, and caused -the trees to cast their fruit. So the men of the city came to Elisha, -and humbly addressing him as "my lord," implored his help. He told them -to bring him a new cruse full of salt, and going with it to the fountain -cast it into the springs, proclaiming in Jehovah's name that they were -healed, and that there should be no more death or miscarrying land. The -gushing waters of the Ain-es-Sultân, fed by the spring of Quarantania, -are to this day pointed out as the Fountains of Elisha, as they have -been since the days of Josephus.[39] - -The anecdote of this beautiful interposition to help a troubled city is -followed by one of the stories which naturally repel us more than any -other in the Old Testament. Elisha, on leaving Jericho, returned to -Bethel, and as he climbed through the forest up the ascent leading to -the town through what is now called the Wady Suweinît, a number of young -lads--with the rudeness which in boys is often a venial characteristic -of their gay spirits or want of proper training, and which to this day -is common among boys in the East--laughed at him, and mocked him with -the cry "Go up, round-head! go up, round-head!"[40] What struck these -ill-bred and irreverent youngsters was the contrast between the rough -hair-skin garb and unkempt shaggy locks of Elijah, "the lord of hair," -and the smooth civilised aspect and shorter hair of his disciple. If the -word _quereach_ means "bald"[41] we see an additional reason for their -ill-mannered jeers, since baldness was a cause of reproach and suspicion -in the East, where it is comparatively rare. No doubt, too, the conduct -of these young scoffers was the more offensive, and even the more -wicked, because of the deeper reverence for age which prevails in -Eastern countries, and above all because Elisha was known as a prophet. -Perhaps, too, if some other reading lies behind the ἐλίθαζον of one MS. -of the Septuagint, they pelted him with stones.[42] That Elisha should -have rebuked them, and that seriously--that he should even have -inflicted some punishment upon them to reform their manners--would have -been natural; but we cannot repress the shudder with which we read the -verse, "And he turned back and looked on them, and cursed them in the -name of the Lord. And there came forth two she-bears out of the wood, -and tare forty-and-two children of them." Surely the punishment was -disproportionate to the offence! Who could doom so much as a single rude -boy, not to speak of forty-two, to a horrible and agonising death for -shouting after any one? It is the chief exception to the general course -of Elisha's compassionate interpositions. Here, too, we must leave the -narrative where it is; but we hold it quite admissible to conjecture -that the incident, in some form or other, really occurred--that the boys -were insolent, and that some of them may have been killed by the wild -beasts which at that time abounded in Palestine--and yet that the -_nuances_ of the story which cause deepest offence to us may have -suffered from some corruption of the tradition in the original records, -and may admit of being represented in a slightly different form. - -After this Elisha went for a time to the ancient haunts of his master -on Mount Carmel, and thence returned to Samaria, the capital of his -country, which he seems to have chosen for his most permanent -dwelling-place. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[37] The name Elisha means "My God is salvation." - -[38] Gen. xiii. 10. "The city of palms" (Deut. xxxiv. 3). - -[39] Jos., _B. J._, IV. viii. 3; Robinson, _Bibl. Researches_, i. 554. - -[40] Abarbanel's notion that they meant "Ascend to heaven as Elijah -did" is absurd. - -[41] קֵרֵהַ. This means bald at the back of the head, as נִבֵּהַ -(_gibbeach_), means "forehead-bald" (Ewald, iii. 512). Elisha could -not have been bald from old age, since he lived on for nearly sixty -years, and must have been a young man. Baldness involved a suspicion -of leprosy, and was disliked by Easterns (Lev. xxi. 5, xiii. 43; Isa. -iii. 17, 24, xv. 2), as much as by the Romans (Suet., _Jul. Cæs._, 45; -_Domit._, 18). Elisha's prophetic activity lasted through the reigns -of Joram, Jehu, Jehoahaz, and Joash (_i.e._, 12 + 28 + 17 + 2 years). - -[42] The κατέπαιζον of the Vat. LXX. implies persistent and vehement -insult. The Post-Mishnic Rabbis, however, say that Elisha was punished -with sickness for this deed (_Bava-Metzia_, f. 87, 1). - - - - - CHAPTER IV - - _THE INVASION OF MOAB_ - - 2 KINGS iii. 4-27 - - "What reinforcement we may gain from hope, - If not, what resolution from despair." - MILTON, _Paradise Lost_, i. 190. - - -Ahaziah, as Elijah had warned him, never recovered from the injuries -received in his fall through the lattice, and after his brief and -luckless reign died without a child. He was succeeded by his brother -Jehoram ("Jehovah is exalted"), who reigned for twelve years.[43] - -Jehoram began well. Though it is said that he did "that which was evil -in the sight of the Lord," we are told that he was not so guilty as his -father or his mother. He did not, of course, abolish the worship of -Jehovah under the cherubic symbol of the calves; no king of Israel -thought of doing that, and so far as we know neither Elijah, nor Elisha, -nor Jonah, nor Micaiah, nor any genuine prophet of Israel before Hosea, -ever protested against that worship, which was chiefly disparaged by -prophets of Judah like Amos and the nameless seer.[44] But Jehoram at -least removed the _Matstsebah_ or stone obelisk which had been reared in -Baal's honour in front of his temple by Ahab, or by Jezebel in his -name.[45] In this direction, however, his reformation must have been -exceedingly partial, for until the sweeping measures taken by Jehu the -temple and images of Baal still continued to exist in Samaria under his -very eyes, and must have been connived at if not approved. - -The first great measure which occupied the thoughts of Jehoram was to -subdue the kingdom of Moab, which had been restored to independence by -the bravery of the great pastoral-king Mesha;[46] or at any rate to -avenge the series of humiliating defeats which Mesha had inflicted on -his brother Ahaziah. A war of forty years' duration[47] had ended in the -complete success of Moab. The loss of a tribute of the fleeces of one -hundred thousand lambs and one hundred thousand rams was too serious to -be lightly faced.[48] Jehoram laid his plans well. First he ordered a -muster of all the men of war throughout his kingdom, and then appealed -for the co-operation of Jehoshaphat and his vassal-king of Edom. Both -kings consented to join him. Jehoshaphat had already been the victim of -a powerful and wanton aggression on the part of King Mesha,[49] from -which he had been delivered by the panic of his foes in the Valley of -Salt. Though the king of Edom had, on that occasion, been an ally of -Mesha, the forces of Edom had fallen the first victims of that -internecine panic. Both Judah and Edom, therefore, had grave wrongs to -avenge, and eagerly seized the opportunity to humble the growing pride -of the people of Chemosh. The attack was wisely arranged. It was -determined to advance against Moab from the south, through the territory -of Edom, by a rough and mountainous track, and, as far as possible, to -take the nation by surprise. The combined host took a seven days' -circuit round the south of the Dead Sea, hoping to find an abundant -supply of water in the stream which flows through the Wady-el-Ahsa, -which separates Edom from Moab.[50] But owing to recent droughts the -Wady was waterless, and the armies, with their horses, suffered all the -agonies of thirst. Jehoram gave way to despair, bewailing that Jehovah -should have brought together these three kings to deliver them a -helpless prey into the hands of Moab. But the pious Jehoshaphat at once -thinks of "inquiring of the Lord" by some true prophet, and one of -Jehoram's courtiers informs him that no less a person than Elisha, the -son of Shaphat, who had been the attendant of Elijah, is with the -host.[51] We are surprised to find that his presence in the camp had -excited so little attention as to be unknown to the king;[52] but -Jehoshaphat, on hearing his name, instantly acknowledged his prophetic -inspiration. So urgent was the need, and so deep the sense of Elisha's -greatness, that the three kings in person went on an embassy "to the -servant of him who ran before the chariot of Ahab." Their humble appeal -to him produced so little elation in his mind that, addressing Jehoram, -who was the most powerful, he exclaimed, with rough indignation: "What -have I to do with thee? Get thee to the prophets of thy -father,"--nominal prophets of Jehovah, who will say to thee smooth -things and prophesy deceits, as four hundred of them did to Ahab--"and -to the Baal-prophets of thy mother." Instead of resenting this scant -respect Jehoram, in utmost distress, deprecated the prophet's anger, and -appealed to his pity for the peril of the three armies. But Elisha is -not mollified. He tells Jehoram that but for the presence of Jehoshaphat -he would not so much as look at him: so completely was the destiny of -the people mixed up with the character of their kings! Out of respect -for Jehoshaphat Elisha will do what he can. But all his soul is in a -tumult of emotion. For the moment he can do nothing. He needs to be -calmed from his agitation by the spell of music, and bids them send a -minstrel to him. The harper came, and as Elisha listened his soul was -composed, and "the hand of the Lord came upon him" to illuminate and -inspire his thoughts.[53] The result was that he bade them dig trenches -in the dry wady, and promised that, though they should see neither wind -nor rain, the valley should be filled with water to quench the thirst of -the fainting armies, their horses and their cattle. After this God would -also deliver the Moabites into their hand; and they were bidden to smite -the cities, fell the trees, stop the wells, and mar the smiling -pasture-lands, which constituted the wealth of Moab, with stones. That -the hosts of Judah and Israel and jealous Edom should be prone to -afflict this awfully devastating vengeance on a power by which they had -been so severely defeated on past occasions, and on which they had so -many wrongs and blood-feuds to avenge, was natural; but it is surprising -to find a prophet of the Lord giving the commission to ruin the gifts of -God and spoil the innocent labours of man, and thus to inflict misery on -generations yet unborn. The behest is directly contrary to rules of -international war which have prevailed even between non-Christian -nations, among whom the stopping or poisoning of wells and the cutting -down of fruit trees has been expressly forbidden. It is also against the -rules of war laid down in Deuteronomy.[54] Such, however, was the -command attributed to Elisha; and, as we shall see, it was fulfilled, -and seems to have led to disastrous consequences. - -Cheered by the promise of Divine aid which the prophet had given them, -the host retired to rest. The next morning at day-dawn, when the -_minchah_ of fine flour, oil, and frankincense was offered,[55] water, -which, according to the tradition of Josephus, had fallen at three -days' distance on the hills of Edom, came flowing from the south and -filled the wady with its refreshing streams. - -The incident itself is highly instructive. It throws light both upon -the general accuracy of the ancient narrative, and on the fact that -events to which a directly supernatural colouring is given are, in -many instances, not so much supernatural as providential. The -deliverance of Israel was due, not to a portent wrought by Elisha, but -to the pure wisdom which he derived from the inspiration of God. When -the counsels of princes were of none effect, and for lack of the -spirit of counsel the people were perishing, his mind alone, -illuminated by a wisdom from on high, saw what was the right step to -take. He bade the soldiers dig trenches in the dry torrent bed,--which -was the very step most likely to ensure their deliverance from the -torment of thirst, and which would be done under similar circumstances -to this day. They saw neither wind nor rain; but there had been a -storm among the farther hills, and the swollen watercourses discharged -their overflow into the trenches of the wady which were ready prepared -for them, and offered the path of least resistance. - -Moab, meanwhile, had heard of the advance of the three kings through the -territories of Edom. The whole military population had mustered in arms, -and stood on the frontier, on the other side of the dry wady, to oppose -the invasion. For they knew this would be a struggle of life and death, -and that if defeated they would have no mercy to expect. When the sun -rose, and its first rays burned on the wady, which had been dry on the -previous evening, the water which, unknown to the Moabites, had filled -the trenches in the night, looked red as blood. Doubtless it may have -been stained, as Ewald says, by the red soil which gave its name to the -red land of the "red king, Edom"; but as it gleamed under the dawn the -Moabites thought that those seemingly crimson pools had been filled with -the blood of their enemies, who had fallen by each other's swords. Their -own recent experience when Jehoshaphat met them in the Valley of Salt -showed them how easy it was for temporary allies to be seized by panic, -and to fight among themselves.[56] - -The army of their invaders was composed of heterogeneous and mutually -conflicting elements. Between Israel and Judah there had been nearly a -century of war,[57] and only a brief reunion; and Edom, recently the -willing and natural ally of Moab, was not likely to fight very -zealously for Judah, which had reduced her to vassalage. So the -Moabites said to one another, as they pointed to the unexpected -apparition of those red pools: "This is blood. The kings are surely -destroyed, and they have smitten each man his fellow. Moab to the -spoil!" They rushed down tumultuously on the camp of Israel, and found -the soldiers of Jehoram ready to receive them. Taken by surprise, for -they had expected no resistance, they were hurled back in utter -confusion and with immense slaughter. The three kings pushed their -advantage to the utmost. They went forward into the land, driving and -smiting the Moabites before them, and ruthlessly carrying out the -command attributed to Elisha. They beat down the cities--most of which -in a land of flocks and herds were little more than pastoral villages; -they rendered the green fields useless with stones; they filled up all -the wells with earth; they felled every fruit-bearing tree of any -value. At last only one stronghold, Kir-haraseth, the chief fenced -town of Moab, held out against them.[58] Even this fortress was sore -bested. The slingers, for which Israel, and specially the tribe of -Benjamin, was so famous, advanced to drive its defenders from the -battlements. King Mesha fought with undaunted heroism. He decided to -take the seven hundred warriors who were left to him, and cut his way -through the besieging host to the king of Edom. He thought that even -now he might persuade the Edomites to abandon this new and unnatural -alliance, and turn the battle against their common enemies. But the -numbers against him were too strong, and he found the plan impossible. -Then he formed a dreadful resolution, dictated to him by the extremity -of his despair. His inscription at Karcha shows that he was a profound -and even fanatical believer in Chemosh, his god. Chemosh could still -deliver him. If Chemosh was, as Mesha says in his inscription, "angry -with his land"--if, even for a time, he allowed his faithful people -and his devoted king to be afflicted--it could not be for any lack of -power on his part, but only because they had in some way offended him, -so that he was wroth, or because he had gone on a journey, or was -asleep, or deaf.[59] How could he be appeased? Only by the offering of -the most precious of all the king's possessions; only by the -self-devotion of the crown-prince, on whom were centred all the -nation's hopes. Mesha would force Chemosh to help him for very shame. -He would offer to Chemosh a human sacrifice, the sacrifice of his -eldest son that should have reigned in his stead. Doubtless the young -prince gave himself up as a willing offering, for that was essential -to the holocaust being valid and acceptable.[60] - -So upon the wall of Kir-haraseth, in the sight of all the Moabites, -and of the three invading armies, the brave and desperate hero of a -hundred fights, who had inflicted so many reverses upon these enemies, -and received so many at their hands, but who, having liberated his -country, now saw all the efforts of his life ruined at one blow--took -his eldest son, kindled the sacrificial fire, and then and there -solemnly offered that horrible burnt-offering.[61] - -And it proved effectual, though far otherwise than Mesha had expected. -He was delivered; and, doubtless, if ever he reared, at Kirharaseth or -elsewhere, another memorial stone, he would have attributed his -deliverance to his national god. But here, in the annals of Elisha, -the result is hurried over, and a veil is, so to speak, dropped upon -the dreadful scene with the one ambiguous expression, "And there was -great wrath against Israel: and they departed from him, and returned -to their own land." - -The phrase awakens but does not satisfy our curiosity. We are not -certain of the translation, or of the meaning. It may be, as in the -margin of the Revised Version, "there came great wrath upon -Israel."[62] But wrath from whom? and on what account? The word -"wrath" all but invariably denotes divine wrath; but we cannot imagine -(as some critics do) that any Israelite of the schools of the prophets -would sanction the notion that the chosen people were allowed to -suffer from the kindled wrath of Chemosh. Can we then suppose that the -desperate act of King Mesha was a proof that Israel, who was no doubt -the most interested and the most remorseless of the invaders, had -pressed the Moabites too hard, and carried his vengeance much too far? -That is by no means impossible. The prophet Amos denounces upon Moab -in after years the doom that fire should devour the palaces of -Kirioth, and that Moab should perish with shoutings, and all his royal -line be cut off, for the far less offence of having burned into lime -the bones of the king of Edom.[63] The command of Elisha did not -exempt the Israelites from their share of moral responsibility. Jehu -was commissioned to be an executioner of vengeance upon the house of -Ahab. Yet Jehu is expressly condemned by the prophet Hosea for the -tiger-like ferocity and horrible thoroughness with which he had -carried out his destined work.[64] Only one other explanation is -possible. If "wrath" here has the unusual sense of human indignation, -the clause can only imply that the armies of Judah and Edom were -roused to anger by the unpitying spirit which Israel had displayed. -The horrible tragedy enacted upon the wall of Kirharaseth awoke their -consciences to the sense of human compassion. These, after all, were -fellow-men--fellow-men of kindred blood to their own--whom they had -driven to straits so frightful as to cause a king to burn his own heir -alive as a mute appeal to his god in the hour of overwhelming ruin. -They had done enough: - - "Sunt lacrimæ rerum et mentem mortalia tangunt." - -They hastily broke up the league, dissolved the alliance, returned -horror-stricken to their own land. They left Moab indeed in possession -of his last fortress, but they had reduced his territory to a -wilderness before they retired and called it peace. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[43] There are great difficulties in the statement (2 Kings iii. 1) -that he began to reign in the eighteenth year of Jehoshaphat. I have -not entered, nor shall I enter, into the minute and precarious -conjectures necessitated by the uncertainties and contradictions of -this synchronism introduced into the narrative by some editor. Suffice -it that with the aid of the Assyrian records we have certain _points -de repère_; from which we can, with the assistance of the historian, -conjecturally restore the main data. In the dates given at the head of -the chapters I follow Kittel, as a careful inquirer. Some of the -approximately fixed dates are (see Appendix I.):-- - - 854. Battle of Karkar (Ahab and Benhadad against Shalmaneser II.) - 738. Tribute of Menahem to Tiglath-Pileser II. - 732. Fall of Damascus. - 722. Capture of Samaria by Sargon. - 720. Defeat of Sabaco by Sargon in battle of Raphia. - 705. Accession of Sennacherib. - 701. Campaign against Hezekiah. - 608. Death of Josiah. - - -[44] But neither the man of God from Judah nor Amos directly denounce -the calf-worship, so much as its concomitant sins and irregularities. - -[45] Perhaps the true reading is "pillars" (LXX., Vulg., Arab.). - -[46] He is called "a sheep-master," _noked_; LXX., νωκήδ. Elsewhere -the word occurs only in Amos i. 1. The Alex. LXX. has ἦν φέρων φόρον. - -[47] According to the Moabite Stone. - -[48] It is not clear whether the lambs and rams were sent with the -fleeces. The A.V. says "lambs and rams with their wool," in accordance -with Josephus--μυριάδας εἴκοσι προβάτων σὺν τοῖς πόκοις. The LXX. has -the vague ἐπὶ πόκων, and implies that this was a special fine after a -defeat in the revolt (ἐν τῇ ἐπαναστάσει): but comp. Isa. xvi. 1. - -[49] 2 Chron. xx. 1-30. - -[50] Robinson (_Bibl. Res._, ii. 157) identifies it with the brook -_Zered_. Deut. ii. 13; Num. xxi. 12. The name means "valley of -water-pits." W. R. Smith quotes Doughty, _Travels_, i. 26. - -[51] Comp. 1 Kings xxii. 7. The phrase "who poured water on the hands -of Elijah" is a touch of Oriental custom which the traveller in remote -parts of Palestine may still often see. Once, when driven by a storm -into the house of the Sheykh of a tribe which had a rather bad -reputation for brigandage, I was most hospitably entertained; and the -old white-haired Sheykh, his son, and ourselves were waited on by the -grandson, a magnificent youth, who immediately after the meal brought -out an old richly chased ewer and basin, and poured water over our -hands, soiled by eating out of the common dish, of course without -spoons or forks. - -[52] This seems to have struck Josephus (_Antt._, IX. iii. 1), who -says that "he _chanced_ to be in a tent (ἔτυχε κατεσκηνωκώς) outside -the host." - -[53] Comp. 1 Sam. x. 5; 1 Chron. xxv. 1; Ezek. i. 3, xxxiii. 22. -_Menaggēn_ is one who plays on a stringed instrument, _n'gînāh_. The -Pythagoreans used music in the same way (Cic., _Tusc. Disp._, iv. 2). - -[54] Deut. xx. 19, 20. - -[55] Lev. ii. 1. Comp. 1 Kings xviii. 36. - -[56] This dreadful result crippled the revolt of Vindex against Nero. - -[57] Jeroboam I., B.C. 937; Joram, 854. - -[58] Isa. xv. 1, Kir of Moab; Jer. xlviii. 31, Kir-heres. It is built -on a steep calcareous rock, surrounded by a deep, narrow glen, which -thence descends westward to the Dead Sea, under the name of the Wady -Kerak. We know that the armies of Nineveh habitually practised these -brutal modes of devastation in the districts which they conquered. See -Layard, _passim_; Rawlinson, _Ancient Monarchies_ ii. 84. - -[59] 1 Kings xviii. 27. Comp. Psalm xxxv. 23, xliv. 23, lxxxiii. 1, etc. - -[60] Comp. Micah vi. 7. This is an entirely different incident from -that alluded to in Amos ii. 1. - -[61] Eusebius (_Præp. Evang._, iv. 16) quotes from Philo's Phœnician -history a reference to human sacrifices (τοῖς τιμωροῖς δαίμοσιν) at -moments of desperation. - -[62] The rendering is doubtful. LXX., καὶ ἐγένετο μετάμελος μέγας ἐπὶ -Ἰσράηλ; Vulg., indignatio _in_ Israel; Luther, _Da ward Israel sehr -zornig_. - -[63] Amos ii. 1-3. - -[64] Hos. i. 4: "I will avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house of -Jehu." - - - - - CHAPTER V - - _ELISHA'S MIRACLES_ - - 2 KINGS iv. 1-44 - - -We are now in the full tide of Elisha's miracles, and as regards many -of them we can do little more than illustrate the text as it stands. -The record of them clearly comes from some account prevalent in the -schools of the prophets, which is however only fragmentary, and has -been unchronologically pieced into the annals of the kings of Israel. - -The story of Elisha abounds far more in the supernatural than that of -Elijah, and is believed by most critics to be of earlier date. Yet the -scenes and portents of his life are almost wholly lacking in the -element of grandeur which belong to those of the elder seer. His -personality, if on the whole softer and more beneficent, inspires less -of awe, and the whole tone of the biography which recorded these -isolated incidents is lacking in the poetic and impassioned elevation -which marks the episodes of Elijah's history. We see in the records of -Elisha, as in the biographies--so rich in prodigies--of fourth-century -hermits and mediæval saints, how little impressive in itself is the -exercise of abnormal powers; how it derives its sole grandeur from the -accompaniment of great moral lessons and spiritual revelations. John -the Baptist "did no miracle," yet our Lord placed him not only far -above Elisha, but even above Moses and Samuel and Elijah, when He said -of him, "Verily I say unto you, of them that have been born of women -there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist." - -It is impossible not to be struck with the singular parallelism -between the powers exercised by Elisha and those which are attributed -to his predecessor. "How true an heir is Elisha of his master," says -Bishop Hall, "not in his graces only, but in his actions! Both of them -divided the waters of Jordan, the one as his last act, the other as -his first. Elijah's curse was the death of the captains and their -troops; Elisha's curse was the death of the children. Elijah rebuked -Ahab to his face; Elisha, Jehoram. Elijah supplied the drought of -Israel by rain from heaven; Elisha supplied the drought of the three -kings by waters gushing out of the earth; Elijah increased the oil of -the Sareptan, Elisha increased the oil of the prophet's widow; Elijah -raised from death the Sareptan's son, Elisha the Shunammite's; both of -them had one mantle, one spirit; both of them climbed up one Carmel, -one heaven." The resemblance, however, is not at all in character, but -only in external and miraculous circumstances. In all other respects -Elisha furnishes a contrast to Elijah which startles us quite as much -as any superficial resemblances. Elijah was a free, wild Bedawy -prophet, hating and shunning as his ordinary residence the abodes of -men, making his home in the rocky wady or in the mountain glades, -appearing and disappearing suddenly as the wind. He asserted his power -most often in ministries of retribution. Clad in the sheepskin of a -Gadite shepherd or mountaineer, he was not one of those who wear soft -clothing or are found in kings' houses. He usually met monarchs as -their enemy and their reprover, but for the most part avoided them. He -never intervened for years together even in national events of the -utmost importance, whether military or religious, unless he received -the direct call of God, or there appeared to him to be a "_dignus -Vindice nodus_." Elisha, on the other hand, makes his home in cities, -and chiefly in Samaria. He is familiar with kings and moves about with -armies, and has no long retirements into unknown solitudes; and though -he could speak roughly to Jehoram, he is often on the friendliest -terms with him and with other sovereigns. - -The stories of Elisha give us many interesting glimpses into the -social life of Israel in his day. As to their literal historic -accuracy, those must make positive affirmation who feel that they can -do so in accordance alike with adequate authority and with the -sacredness of truth. Many will be unable to escape the opinion that -they bear some resemblance to other Jewish haggadoth, written for -edification, with every innocent intention, in the schools of the -Prophets, but no more intended for perfectly literal acceptance in all -their details than the Life of St. Paul the Hermit, by St. Jerome; or -that of St. Antony, attributed erroneously to St. Athanasius; or that -of St. Francis in the Fioretti; or the lives of humble saints of the -people called _Kisar-el-anbiah_, which are so popular among poor -Mohammedans. Into that question there is no need to enter further. -_Abundet quisque in sensu suo._ - -I. On one occasion a widow of one of the Sons of the Prophets--for -these communities, though cœnobitic, were not celibate--came to him in -deep distress. Her husband--the Jews, with their usual guesswork, -most improbably identify him with Obadiah, the chamberlain of -Ahab[65]--had died insolvent. As she had nothing to pay, her creditor -under the grim provision of the law was about to exercise his right of -selling her two sons into slavery to recoup himself for the debt.[66] -Would Elisha help her? - -Prophets were never men of wealth, so that he could not pay her debt. -He asked her what she possessed to satisfy the demand. "Nothing," she -said, "but a pot of the common oil, used for anointing the body after -a bath." - -Elisha bade her go and borrow from her neighbours all the empty -vessels she could, then to return home, shut the door, and pour the -oil into the vessels. - -She did so. They were all filled, and she asked her son to bring yet -another. But there was not another to be had, so she went out and told -the Man of God. He bade her sell the miraculously multiplied oil to -pay the debt, and live with her sons on the proceeds of what was over. - -II. We next find Elisha at Shunem, famous as the abode of the fair -maiden--probably Abishag, the nurse of David's decrepitude--who is the -heroine of the Song of Songs. It is a village, now called Solam, on the -slopes of Little Hermon (Jebel-el-Duhy), three miles north of Jezreel. -At this place there lived a lady of wealth and influence, whose husband -owned the surrounding land. There were but few khans in Palestine, and -even where they now exist the traveller has in most cases to supply his -own food. Elisha, in his journeys to and fro among the schools of the -Prophets, had often enjoyed the welcome hospitality eagerly pressed -upon him by the lady of Shunem. Struck with his sacred character, she -persuaded her husband to take a step unusual even to the boundless -hospitality of the East. She begged him to do honour to this holy Man of -God by building for him a little chamber (_alîyah_) on the flat roof of -the house, to which he might have easy and private access by the outside -staircase.[67] The chamber was built, and furnished, like any other -simple Eastern room, with a bed, a divan to sit on, a table, and a lamp; -and there the weary prophet on his journeys often found a peaceful, -simple, and delightful resting-place. - -Grateful for the reverence with which she treated him, and the kind -care with which she had supplied his needs, Elisha was anxious to -recompense her in whatever way might be possible. The thought of money -payment was of course out of the question: merely to hint at it would -have been a breach of manners. But perhaps he might be of use to her -in some other way. At this time, and for years afterwards during his -long ministry of perhaps fifty-six years, he was attended by a servant -named Gehazi, who stood to him in the same sort of relation which he -had held to Elijah. He told Gehazi to summon the Shunammite lady. In -the deep humility of Eastern womanhood she came and stood in his -presence. Even then he did not address her. So downtrodden was the -position of women in the East that any dignified person, much more a -great prophet, could not converse with a woman without compromising -his dignity. The more scrupulous Pharisees in the days of Christ -always carefully gathered up their garments in the streets, lest they -should so much as touch a woman with their skirts in passing by, as -the modern Chakams in Jerusalem do to this day.[68] The disciples -themselves, sophisticated by familiarity with such teachers, were -astonished that Jesus at the well of Shechem should talk with a -woman.[69] So, though the lady stood there, Elisha, instead of -speaking to her directly, told Gehazi to thank her for all the devout -respect and care, all 'the modesty of fearful duty,'[70] which she had -displayed towards them, and to ask her if he should say a good word -for her to the King or the Captain of the Host. This is just the sort -of favour which an Eastern would be likely to value most.[71] The -Shunammite, however, was well provided for; she had nothing to -complain of, and nothing to request. She thanked Elisha for his kindly -proposal, but declined it, and went away. - -"Is there, then, nothing which we can do for her?" asked Elisha of -Gehazi.[72] - -There was. Gehazi had learnt that the sorrow of her life--a sorrow and -a source of reproach to any Eastern household, but most of all to that -of a wealthy householder--was her childlessness. - -"Call her," he said. - -She came back, and stood reverently in the doorway. "When the time -comes round," he said to her, "you shall embrace a son." - -The promise raised in her heart a thrill of joy. It was too precious -to be believed. "Nay," she said "my lord, thou Man of God, do not lie -unto thine handmaid." - -But the promise was fulfilled, and the lady of Shunem became the happy -mother of a son. - -III. The charming episode then passes over some years. The child had -grown into a little boy, old enough now to go out alone to see his -father in the harvest fields and to run about among the reapers. But as -he played about in the heat he had a sunstroke, and cried to his father, -"O my head, my head!" Not knowing how serious the matter was, his father -simply ordered one of his lads to carry the child home to his mother. -The fond mother nursed him tenderly upon her knees, but at noon he died. - -Then the lady of Shunem showed all the faith and strength and wisdom of -her character. "The good Shunammite," says Bishop Hall, "had lost her -son; her faith she lost not." Overwhelming as was this calamity--the -loss of an only child--she suppressed all her emotions, and, instead of -bursting into the wild helpless wail of Eastern mourners, or rushing to -her husband with the agonising news, she took the little boy's body in -her arms, carried it up to the chamber which had been built for Elisha, -and laid it upon his bed. Then, shutting the door, she called to her -husband to send to her one of his reapers and one of the asses, for she -was going quickly to the Man of God and would return in the cool of the -evening. "Why should you go to-day particularly?" he asked. "It is -neither new moon, nor sabbath." "It is all right," she said;[73] and -with perfect confidence in the rectitude of all her purposes, he sent -her the she-ass, and a servant to drive it and to run beside it for her -protection on the journey of sixteen miles. - -"Drive on the ass," she said. "Slacken me not the riding unless I tell -you." So with all possible speed she made her way--a journey of -several hours--from Shunem to Mount Carmel. - -Elisha, from his retreat on the hill, marked her coming from a -distance, and it rendered him anxious. "Here comes the Shunammite," he -said to Gehazi. "Run to meet her, and ask Is it well with thee? is it -well with thy husband? is it well with the child?" - -"All well," she answered, for her message was not to Gehazi, and she -could not trust her voice to speak; but pressing on up-hillwards, she -flung herself before Elisha and grasped his feet. Displeased at the -familiarity which dared thus to clasp the feet of his master, Gehazi ran -up to thrust her away by force, but Elisha interfered. "Let her alone," -he cried; "she is in deep affliction, and Jehovah has not revealed to me -the cause." Then her long pent-up emotion burst forth. "Did I desire a -son of my lord?" she cried. "Did I not say do not deceive me?" - -It was enough--though she seemed unable to bring out the dreadful -words that her boy was dead. Catching her meaning, Elisha said to -Gehazi, "Gird up thy loins, take my staff, and without so much as -stopping to salute any one, or to return a salutation,[74] lay my -staff on the dead child's face." But the broken-hearted mother -refused to leave Elisha. She imagined that the servant, the staff, -might be severed from Elisha; but she knew that wherever the prophet -was, there was power. So Elisha arose and followed her, and on the way -Gehazi met them with the news that the child lay still and dead, with -the fruitless staff upon his face. - -Then Elisha in deep anguish went up to the chamber and shut the door, -and saw the boy's body lying pale upon his bed. After earnest prayer -he outstretched himself over the little corpse, as Elijah had done at -Zarephath. Soon it began to grow warm with returning life, and Elisha, -after pacing up and down the room, once more stretched himself over -him. Then the child opened his eyes and sneezed seven times, and -Elisha called to Gehazi to summon the mother. - -"Take up thy son," he said. She prostrated herself at his feet in -speechless gratitude, and took up her recovered child, and went. - -IV. We next find Elisha at Gilgal, in the time of the famine of which -we read his prediction in a later chapter.[75] The sons of the -prophets were seated round him, listening to his instructions; the -hour came for their simple meal, and he ordered the great pot to be -put on the fire for the vegetable soup, on which, with bread, they -chiefly lived. One of them went out for herbs, and carelessly brought -his outer garment (the _abeyah_)[76] full of wild poisonous -coloquinths,[77] which, by ignorance or inadvertence, were shred into -the pottage. But when it was cooked and poured out they perceived the -poisonous taste, and cried out, "O Man of God, death in the pot!" - -"Bring meal," he said, for he seems always to have been a man of the -fewest words. - -They cast in some meal, and were all able to eat of the now harmless -pottage. It has been noticed that in this, as in other incidents of -the story, there is no invocation of the name of Jehovah. - -V. Not far from Gilgal was the little village of Baalshalisha,[78] at -which lived a farmer who wished to bring an offering of firstfruits -and _karmel_ (bruised grain) in his wallet to Elisha as a Man of -God.[79] It was a poor gift enough--only twenty of the coarse barley -loaves which were eaten by the common people, and a sack[80] full of -fresh ears of corn.[81] Elisha told his servitor[82]--perhaps -Gehazi--to set them before the people present. "What?" he asked, "this -trifle of food before a hundred men!" But Elisha told him in the -Lord's name that it should more than suffice; and so it did. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[65] Jos., _Antt._, IX. iv. 2. This perhaps is only suggested by the -reminiscences of 1 Kings xviii. 2, 3, 12. - -[66] Lev. xxv. 39-41; Matt. xviii. 25. - -[67] 2 Kings iv. 10. Not "a little chamber on the wall" (A.V.), but -"an _alîyah_ with walls" (margin, R.V.). - -[68] Frankl., _Jews in the East_. - -[69] John iv. 27: "Then came His disciples, and marvelled that He was -_talking_ (μετὰ γυναικὸς) _with a woman_." - -[70] 2 Kings iv. 13: "Behold, thou hast been careful for us with all -this care" (LXX., πᾶσαν τὴν ἔκστασιν ταύτην). - -[71] The Sheykh with whom I stayed at Bint es Jebeil could think of no -return which I could offer for his hospitality so acceptable as if I -would say a good word for him to the authorities at Beyrout. - -[72] Gehazi is usually called the _na'ar_ or "lad" of Elisha--a term -implying lower service than Elisha's "ministry" to Elijah. - -[73] 2 Kings iv. 23. Hebrew "Peace"; A.V., "It shall be well." - -[74] Salutations occupy some time in the formally courteous East. -Comp. Luke x. 4. - -[75] 2 Kings viii. 1. - -[76] Not "lap," as in A. V. (Heb., _beged_); LXX. συνέλιξε πλῆρες τὸ -ἱμάτιον αὐτοῦ; Vulg., _implevit vestem suam_ (both correctly). - -[77] Heb., _paquoth_; LXX., τολύπην ἀγρίαν; Vulg; _colocynthidas -agri_. Hence the name _cucumis prophetarum_. - -[78] Lord of the Chain and "Three lands." Three wadies meet at this -spot, a little west of Bethel. - -[79] 2 Kings iv. 42. Karmel, Lev. ii. 14. Perhaps a sort of frumenty. - -[80] The word for "wallet" (_tsiqlon_; Vulg., _pera_) occurs here -only. Peshito, "garment." The Vatican LXX. omits it. The Greek version -has ἐν κωρύκῳ αὐτοῦ. - -[81] See Lev. ii. 14, xxiii. 14. - -[82] 2 Kings iv. 43. The word for "his servitor" (_m'chartho_) is used -also of Joshua. It does not mean a mere ordinary attendant. LXX., -λειτουργός; Vulg., _minister_. - - - - - CHAPTER VI - - _THE STORY OF NAAMAN_ - - 2 KINGS v. 1-27 - - MATT. viii. 3: Θέλω, καθαρίσθητι - - -After these shorter anecdotes we have the longer episode of -Naaman.[83] - -A part of the misery inflicted by the Syrians on Israel was caused by -the forays in which their light-armed bands, very much like the -borderers on the marches of Wales or Scotland, descended upon the -country and carried off plunder and captives before they could be -pursued. - -In one of these raids they had seized a little Israelitish girl and -sold her to be a slave. She had been purchased for the household of -Naaman, the captain of the Syrian host, who had helped his king and -nation to win important victories either against Israel or against -Assyria. Ancient Jewish tradition identified him with the man who had -"drawn his bow at a venture" and slain King Ahab. But all Naaman's -valour and rank and fame, and the honour felt for him by his king, -were valueless to him, for he was suffering from the horrible -affliction of leprosy. Lepers do not seem to have been segregated in -other countries so strictly as they were in Israel, or at any rate -Naaman's leprosy was not of so severe a form as to incapacitate him -from his public functions. - -But it was evident that he was a man who had won the affection of all -who knew him; and the little slave girl who waited on his wife -breathed to her a passionate wish that Naaman could visit the Man of -God in Samaria, for he would recover him from his leprosy. The saying -was repeated, and one of Naaman's friends mentioned it to the king of -Syria. Benhadad was so much struck by it that he instantly determined -to send a letter, with a truly royal gift to the king of Israel, who -could, he supposed, as a matter of course, command the services of the -prophet. The letter came to Jehoram with a stupendous present of -ingots of silver to the value of ten talents, and six thousand pieces -of gold, and ten changes of raiment.[84] After the ordinary -salutations, and a mention of the gifts, the letter continued "And -now, when this letter is come to thee, behold I have sent Naaman my -servant, that thou mayest recover him of his leprosy." - -Jehoram lived in perpetual terror of his powerful and encroaching -neighbour. Nothing was said in the letter about the Man of God; and -the king rent his clothes, exclaiming that he was not God to kill and -to make alive, and that this must be a base pretext for a quarrel. It -never so much as occurred to him, as it certainly would have done to -Jehoshaphat, that the prophet, who was so widely known and honoured, -and whose mission had been so clearly attested in the invasion of -Moab, might at least help him to face this problem. Otherwise the -difficulty might indeed seem insuperable, for leprosy was universally -regarded as an incurable disease. - -But Elisha was not afraid: he boldly told Jehoram to send the Syrian -captain to him. Naaman, with his horses and his chariots, in all the -splendour of a royal ambassador, drove up to the humble house of the -prophet. Being so great a man, he expected a deferential reception, -and looked for the performance of his cure in some striking and -dramatic manner. "The prophet," so he said to himself, "will come out, -and solemnly invoke the name of his God Jehovah, and wave his hand -over the leprous limbs, and so work the miracle."[85] - -But the servant of the King of kings was not exultantly impressed, as -false prophets so often are, by earthly greatness. Elisha did not even -pay him the compliment of coming out of the house to meet him. He -wished to efface himself completely, and to fix the leper's thoughts -on the one truth that if healing was granted to him, it was due to the -gift of God, not to the thaumaturgy or arts of man. He simply sent out -his servant to the Syrian commander-in-chief with the brief message, -"Go and wash in Jordan seven times, and be thou clean." - -Naaman, accustomed to the extreme deference of many dependants, was not -only offended, but enraged, by what he regarded as the scant courtesy -and procrastinated boon of the prophet. Why was he not received as a man -of the highest distinction? What necessity could there be for sending -him all the way to the Jordan? And why was he bidden to wash in that -wretched, useless, tortuous stream, rather than in the pure and flowing -waters of his own native Abanah and Pharpar?[86] How was he to tell that -this "Man of God" did not design to mock him by sending him on a fool's -errand, so that he would come back as a laughing-stock both to the -Israelites and to his own people? Perhaps he had not felt any great -faith in the prophet, to begin with; but whatever he once felt had now -vanished. He turned and went away in a rage. - -But in this crisis the affection of his friends and servants stood him -in good stead. Addressing him, in their love and pity, by the unusual -term of honour "my father," they urged upon him that, as he certainly -would not have refused some _great_ test, there was no reason why he -should refuse this simple and humble one. - -He was won over by their reasonings, and descending the hot steep valley -of the Jordan, bathed himself in the river seven times. God healed him, -and, as Elisha had promised, "his flesh," corroded by leprosy, "came -again like the flesh of a little child, and he was clean." - -This healing of Naaman is alluded to by our Lord to illustrate the truth -that the love of God extended farther than the limits of the chosen -race; that His Fatherhood is co-extensive with the whole family of man. - -It is difficult to conceive the transport of a man cured of this most -loathsome and humiliating of all earthly afflictions. Naaman, who seems -to have possessed "a mind naturally Christian," was filled with -gratitude. Unlike the thankless Jewish lepers whom Christ cured as He -left Engannim, this alien returned to give glory to God. Once more the -whole imposing cavalcade rode through the streets of Samaria, and -stopped at Elisha's door. This time Naaman was admitted into his -presence. He saw, and no doubt Elisha had strongly impressed on him the -truth, that his healing was the work not of man but of God; and as he -had found no help in the deities of Syria, he confessed that the God of -Israel was the only true God among those of the nations. In token of his -thankfulness he presses Elisha, as God's instrument in the unspeakable -mercy which has been granted to him, to accept "a blessing" (_i.e._, a -present) from him--"from thy servant," as he humbly styled himself. - -Elisha was no greedy Balaam. It was essential that Naaman and the -Syrians should not look on him as on some vulgar sorcerer who wrought -wonders for "the rewards of divination." His wants were so simple that -he stood above temptation. His desires and treasures were not on -earth. To put an end to all importunity, he appealed to Jehovah with -his usual solemn formula--"As the Lord liveth before whom I stand, I -will receive no present."[87] - -Still more deeply impressed by the prophet's incorruptible superiority -to so much as a suspicion of low motives, Naaman asked that he might -receive two mules' burden of earth wherewith to build an altar to the -God of Israel of His own sacred soil.[88] The very soil ruled by such -a God must, he thought, be holier than other soil; and he wished to -take it back to Syria, just as the people of Pisa rejoiced to fill -their Campo Santo with mould from the Holy Land, and just as mothers -like to baptize their children in water brought home from the Jordan. -Henceforth, said Naaman, I will offer burnt-offering and sacrifice to -no God but unto Jehovah. Yet there was one difficulty in the way. When -the King of Syria went to worship in the temple of his god Rimmon it -was the duty of Naaman to accompany him.[89] The king leaned on his -hand, and when he bowed before the idol it was Naaman's duty to bow -also. He begged that for this concession God would pardon him. - -Elisha's answer was perhaps different from what Elijah might have given. -He practically allowed Naaman to give this sign of outward compliance -with idolatry, by saying to him, "Go in peace." It is from this -circumstance that the phrase "to bow in the house of Rimmon" has become -proverbial to indicate a dangerous and dishonest compromise. But -Elisha's permission must not be misunderstood. He did but hand over this -semi-heathen convert to the grace of God. It must be remembered that he -lived in days long preceding the conviction that proselytism is a part -of true religion; in days when the thought of missions to heathen lands -was utterly unknown. The position of Naaman was wholly different from -that of any Israelite. He was only the convert, or the half-convert of -a day, and though he acknowledged the supremacy of Jehovah as alone -worthy of his worship, he probably shared in the belief--common even in -Israel--that there were other gods, local gods, gods of the nations, to -whom Jehovah might have divided the limits of their power.[90] To demand -of one who, like Naaman, had been an idolater all his days, the sudden -abandonment of every custom and tradition of his life, would have been -to demand from him an unreasonable, and, in his circumstances, useless -and all but impossible self-sacrifice. The best way was to let him feel -and see for himself the futility of Rimmon-worship. If he were not -frightened back from his sudden faith in Jehovah, the scruple of -conscience which he already felt in making his request might naturally -grow within him and lead him to all that was best and highest. The -temporary condonation of an imperfection might be a wise step towards -the ultimate realisation of a truth. We cannot at all blame Elisha, if, -with such knowledge as he then possessed, he took a mercifully tolerant -view of the exigencies of Naaman's position. The bowing in the house of -Rimmon under such conditions probably seemed to him no more than an act -of outward respect to the king and to the national religion in a case -where no evil results could follow from Naaman's example.[91] - -But the general principle that _we_ must _not_ bow in the house of -Rimmon remains unchanged. The light and knowledge vouchsafed to us far -transcend those which existed in times when men had not seen the days of -the Son of Man. The only rule which sincere Christians can follow is to -have no truce with Canaan, no halting between two opinions, no -tampering, no compliance, no connivance, no complicity with evil,--even -no tolerance of evil as far as their own conduct is concerned. No good -man, in the light of the Gospel dispensation, could condone himself in -seeming to sanction--still less in doing--anything which in his opinion -ought not to be done, or in saying anything which implied his own -acquiescence in things which he knows to be evil. "Sir," said a -parishioner to one of the non-juring clergy: "there is many a man who -has made a great gash in his conscience; cannot you make a little nick -in yours?" No! a _little_ nick is, in one sense, as fatal as a great -gash. It is an abandonment of _the principle_; it is a violation of the -Law. The wrong of it consists in this--that all evil begins, not in the -commission of great crimes, but in the slight divergence from right -rules. The angle made by two lines may be infinitesimally small, but -produce the lines and it may require infinitude to span the separation -between the lines which inclose so tiny an angle. The wise man gave the -only true rule about wrong-doing, when he said, "Enter not into the path -of the wicked and go not in the way of evil men. Avoid it, pass not by -it, turn from it and pass away."[92] And the reason for his rule is -that the beginning of sin--like the beginning of strife--"is as when one -letteth out water."[93] - -The proper answer to all abuses of any supposed concession to the -lawfulness of bowing in the house of Rimmon--if that be interpreted to -mean the doing of anything which our consciences cannot wholly -approve--is _Obsta principiis_--avoid the beginnings of evil. - - "We are not worst at once; the course of evil - Begins so slowly, and from such slight source, - An infant's hand might stem the breach with clay; - But let the stream grow wider, and philosophy, - Age, and religion too, may strive in vain - To stem the headstrong current." - -The mean cupidity of Gehazi, the servant of Elisha, gives a deplorable -sequel to the story of the prophet's magnanimity. This man's wretched -greed did its utmost to nullify the good influence of his master's -example. There may be more wicked acts recorded in Scripture than that -of Gehazi, but there is scarcely one which shows so paltry a -disposition. - -He had heard the conversation between his master and the Syrian -marshal, and his cunning heart despised as a futile sentimentality the -magnanimity which had refused an eagerly proffered reward. Naaman was -rich: he had received a priceless boon; it would be rather a pleasure -to him than otherwise to return for it some acknowledgment which he -would not miss. Had he not even seemed a little hurt by Elisha's -refusal to receive it? What possible harm could there be in taking -what he was anxious to give? And how useful those magnificent presents -would be, and to what excellent uses could they be put! He could not -approve of the fantastic and unpractical scrupulosity which had led -Elisha to refuse the "blessing" which he had so richly earned. Such -attitudes of unworldliness seemed entirely foolish to Gehazi. - -So pleaded the Judas-spirit within the man. By such specious delusions -he inflamed his own covetousness, and fostered the evil temptation -which had taken sudden and powerful hold upon his heart, until it took -shape in a wicked resolve. - -The mischief of Elisha's quixotic refusal was done, but it could be -speedily undone, and no one would be the worse. The evil spirit was -whispering to Gehazi:-- - - "Be mine and Sin's for one short hour; and then - Be all thy life the happiest man of men." - -"Behold," he said, with some contempt both for Elisha and for Naaman, -"my master hath let off this Naaman the Syrian; but as the Lord liveth -I will run after him, and take somewhat of him." - -"As the Lord liveth!" It had been a favourite appeal of Elijah and -Elisha, and the use of it by Gehazi shows how utterly meaningless and -how very dangerous such solemn words become when they are degraded -into formulæ.[94] It is thus that the habit of swearing begins. The -light use of holy words very soon leads to their utter degradation. -How keen is the satire in Cowper's little story:-- - - "A Persian, humble servant of the sun, - Who, though devout, yet bigotry had none, - Hearing a lawyer, grave in his address, - With adjurations every word impress,-- - Supposed the man a bishop, or, at least, - God's Name so often on his lips--a priest. - Bowed at the close with all his gracious airs, - And begged an interest in his frequent prayers!" - - -Had Gehazi felt their true meaning--had he realised that on Elisha's -lips they meant something infinitely more real than on his own, he -would not have forgotten that in Elisha's answer to Naaman they had -all the validity of an oath, and that he was inflicting on his master -a shameful wrong, when he led Naaman to believe that, after so sacred -an adjuration, the prophet had frivolously changed his mind. - -Gehazi had not very far to run,[95] for in a country full of hills, -and of which the roads are rough, horses and chariots advance but -slowly. Naaman, chancing to glance backwards, saw the prophet's -attendant running after him. Anticipating that he must be the bearer -of some message from Elisha, he not only halted the cavalcade, but -sprang down from his chariot,[96] and went to meet him with the -anxious question, "Is all well?" - -"Well," answered Gehazi; and then had ready his cunning lie. "Two -youths," he said, "of the prophetic schools had just unexpectedly come -to his master from the hill country of Ephraim; and though he would -accept nothing for himself, Elisha would be glad if Naaman would spare -him two changes of garments, and one talent of silver for these poor -members of a sacred calling."[97] - -Naaman must have been a little more or a little less than human if he -did not feel a touch of disappointment on hearing this message. The gift -was nothing to him. It was a delight to him to give it, if only to -lighten a little the burden of gratitude which he felt towards his -benefactor. But if he had felt elevated by the magnanimous example of -Elisha's disinterestedness, he must have thought that this hasty request -pointed to a little regret on the prophet's part for his noble -self-denial. After all, then, even prophets were but men, and gold after -all was gold! The change of mind about the gift brought Elisha a little -nearer the ordinary level of humanity, and, so far, it acted as a sort -of disenchantment from the high ideal exhibited by his former refusal. -And so Naaman said, with alacrity, "Be content: take two talents." - -The fact that Gehazi's conduct thus inevitably compromised his master, -and undid the effects of his example, is part of the measure of the -man's apostacy. It showed how false and hypocritical was his position, -how unworthy he was to be the ministering servant of a prophet. Elisha -was evidently deceived in the man altogether. The heinousness of his -guilt lies in the words _Corruptio optimi pessima_. When religion is -used for a cloak of covetousness, of usurping ambition, of secret -immorality, it becomes deadlier than infidelity. Men raze the -sanctuary, and build their idol temples on the hallowed ground. They -cover their base encroachments and impure designs with the "cloke of -profession, doubly lined with the fox-fur of hypocrisy," and hide the -leprosy which is breaking out upon their foreheads with the golden -_petalon_ on which is inscribed the title of "holiness to the Lord." - -At first Gehazi did not like to take so large a sum as two talents; -but the crime was already committed, and there was not much more harm -done in taking two talents than in taking one. Naaman urged him, and -it is very improbable that, unless the chances of detection weighed -with him, he needed much urging. So the Syrian weighed out silver -ingots to the amount of two talents, and putting them in two satchels -laid them on two of his servants and told them to carry the money -before Gehazi to Elisha's house. But Gehazi had to keep a look-out -lest his nefarious dealings should be observed, and when they came to -Ophel--the word means the foot of the hill of Samaria, or some part of -the fortifications[98]--he took the bags from the two Syrians, -dismissed them, and carried the money to some place where he could -conceal it in the house. Then, as though nothing had happened, with -his usual smooth face of sanctimonious integrity, the pious Jesuit -went and stood before his master. - -He had not been unnoticed! His heart must have sunk within him when -there smote upon his ear Elisha's question,-- - -"Whence comest thou, Gehazi?" - -But one lie is as easy as another, and Gehazi was doubtless an adept -at lying. - -"Thy servant went no whither," he replied, with an air of innocent -surprise. - -"_Went not_ my beloved one?"[99] said Elisha--and he must have said it -with a groan, as he thought how utterly unworthy the youth, whom he -thus called "my loving heart" or "my dear friend,"--"when the man -turned from his chariot to meet thee?" It may be that from the hill -of Samaria Elisha had seen it all, or that he had been told by one who -had seen it. If not, he had been rightly led to read the secret of his -servant's guilt. "Is it a time," he asked, "to act thus?" Did not my -example show thee that there was a high object in refusing this -Syrian's gifts, and in leading him to feel that the servants of -Jehovah do His bidding with no afterthought of sordid considerations? -Are there not enough troubles about us actual and impending, to show -that this is no time for the accumulation of earthly treasures? Is it -a time to receive money--and all that money will procure? to receive -garments, and olive-yards and vineyards, and oxen, and men-servants -and maid-servants? Has a prophet no higher aim than the accumulation -of earthly goods, and are his needs such as earthly goods can supply? -And hast thou, the daily friend and attendant of a prophet, learnt so -little from his precepts and his example? - -Then followed the tremendous penalty for so grievous a -transgression--a transgression made up of meanness, irreverence, -greed, cheating, treachery, and lies. - -"The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy -seed for ever!" "Oh heavy talents of Gehazi!" exclaims Bishop Hall: -"Oh the horror of the one unchangeable suit! How much better had been -a light purse and a homely coat, with a sound body and a clean soul!" - -"And he went out from his presence a leper as white as snow."[100] - -It is the characteristic of the leprous taint in the system to be thus -suddenly developed, and apparently in crises of sudden and -overpowering emotion it might affect the whole blood. And one of the -many morals which lie in Gehazi's story is again that moral to which -the world's whole experience sets its seal--that though the guilty -soul may sell itself for a desired price, the sum-total of that price -is nought. It is Achan's ingots buried under the sod on which stood -his tent. It is Naboth's vineyard made abhorrent to Ahab on the day he -entered it. It is the thirty pieces of silver which Judas dashed with -a shriek upon the Temple floor. It is Gehazi's leprosy for which no -silver talents or changes of raiment could atone. - -The story of Gehazi--of the son of the prophets who would naturally -have succeeded Elisha as Elisha had succeeded Elijah--must have had a -tremendous significance to warn the members of the prophetic schools -from the peril of covetousness. That peril, as all history proves to -us, is one from which popes and priests, monks, and even nominally -ascetic and nominally pauper communities, have never been exempt;--to -which, it may even be said, that they have been peculiarly liable. -Mercenariness and falsity, displayed under the pretence of religion, -were never more overwhelmingly rebuked. Yet, as the Rabbis said, it -would have been better if Elisha, in repelling with the left hand, had -also drawn with the right.[101] - - * * * * * - -The fine story of Elisha and Naaman, and the fall and punishment of -Gehazi, is followed by one of the anecdotes of the prophet's life -which appears to our unsophisticated, perhaps to our imperfectly -enlightened judgment, to rise but little above the ecclesiastical -portents related in mediæval hagiologies. - -At some unnamed place--perhaps Jericho--the house of the Sons of the -Prophets had become too small for their numbers and requirements, and -they asked Elisha's leave to go down to the Jordan and cut beams to make -a new residence. Elisha gave them leave, and at their request consented -to go with them. While they were hewing, the axe-head of one of them -fell into the water, and he cried out, "Alas! master, it was borrowed!" -Elisha ascertained where it had fallen. He then cut down a stick,[102] -and cast it on the spot, and the iron swam and the man recovered it. - -The story is perhaps an imaginative reproduction of some unwonted -incident. At any rate, we have no sufficient evidence to prove that it -may not be so. It is wholly unlike the economy invariably shown in the -Scripture narratives which tell us of the exercise of supernatural -power. All the eternal laws of nature are here superseded at a word, as -though it were an every-day matter, without even any recorded invocation -of Jehovah, to restore an axe-head, which could obviously have been -recovered or resupplied in some much less stupendous way than by making -iron swim on the surface of a swift-flowing river. It is easy to invent -conventional and _à priori_ apologies to show that religion demands the -unquestioning acceptance of this prodigy, and that a man must be -shockingly wicked who does not feel certain that it happened exactly in -the literal sense; but whether the doubt or the defence be morally -worthier, is a thing which God alone can judge.[103] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[83] It is curiously omitted by Josephus, though he mentions him -(Ἄμανος) as the slayer of Ahab (_Antt._, VIII. xv. 5). The name is an -old Hebrew name (Num. xxvi. 40). - -[84] The word _l'boosh_ means a gala dress. Comp. v. 5; Gen. xlv. 22. -χιτῶνες ἐπημοιβοί (Hom., _Od._, xiv. 514). Comp. viii. 249. - -[85] Elisha would not be likely to _touch_ the place. - -[86] Now the _Burâda_ ("cold") and the Nahr-el-Awâj. - -[87] Compare the answer of Abraham to the King of Sodom (Gen. xiv. 23). - -[88] The feeling which influenced Naaman is the same which led the -Jews to build Nahardea in Persia of stones from Jerusalem. Altars were -to be of earth (Exod. xx. 24), but no altar is mentioned in 2 Kings v. -17, and the LXX. does not even specify _earth_ (γόμος ζεῦγος ἡμιόνων). - -[89] This is the only place in Scripture where Rimmon is mentioned, -though we have the name Tab-Rimmon ("Rimmon is good"), 1 Kings xv. 18, -and Hadad-Rimmon (Zech. xii. 11). He was the god of the thunder. The -word means "pomegranate," and some have fancied that this was one of -his symbols. But the resemblance may be accidental, and the name was -properly _Ramman_. - -[90] See Deut. xxxii. 8, where the LXX. has κατὰ ἀριθμὸν ἀγγέλων. - -[91] The moral difficulty must have been early felt, for the -Alexandrian LXX. reads καὶ προσκυνήσω ἄμα αὐτῷ ἐγὼ Κυρίῳ τῷ Θεῷ μου. -But he would still be bowing in the House of Rimmon, though he might -in his heart worship God. "Elisha, like Elijah" (says Dean Stanley), -"made no effort to set right what had gone so wrong. Their mission was -to make the best of what they found; not to bring back a rule of -religion which had passed away, but to dwell on the Moral Law which -could be fulfilled everywhere, not on the Ceremonial Law which -circumstances seemed to have put out of their reach: 'not sending the -Shunammite to Jerusalem' (says Cardinal Newman), 'not eager for a -proselyte in Naaman, yet making the heathen fear the Name of God, and -proving to them that there was a prophet in Israel'" (Stanley, -_Lectures_, ii. 377; Newman, _Sermons_, viii. 415). - -[92] Prov. iv. 14, 15. - -[93] Prov. xvii. 14. - -[94] On Gehazi's lips it meant no more than the incessant _Wallah_, -"by God," of Mohammedans. - -[95] 2 Kings v. 19. Heb., _kib'rath aretz_, "a little way"--literally, -"a space of country." (The Vatican LXX. follows another reading, εἰς -Δεβραθὰ τῆς γῆς; Vulg., _electo terræ tempore_[?].) - -[96] LXX., κατεπήδησεν. - -[97] A talent of silver was worth about £400--an enormous sum for two -half-naked youths. - -[98] 2 Kings v. 24. The LXX. (εἰς τὸ σκοτεινὸν) seems to have read -אֹפֵל (_ophel_); "darkness," a treasury or secret place, for צַֹפֶל, -and so the Vulgate _jam vesperi_. - -[99] 2 Kings v. 26. The verse is so interpreted by some critics, -especially Ewald, followed by Stanley. Margin, R.V.: "Mine heart went -not from me, when" etc. - -[100] Exod. iv. 6; Num. xii. 10. - -[101] The later Rabbis thought that Elisha was too severe with Gehazi, -and was punished with sickness because "he repelled him with both his -hands" (_Bava-Metsia_, f. 87, 1, and _Yalkut Jeremiah_). - -[102] The Hebrew word for "cut off" (_qatsab_) is very rare. LXX., -ἀπέκνισε ξύλον; Vulg., _præcidit lignum_. - -[103] It must be further borne in mind that "the iron did swim" (A.V.) -is less accurate than "made the iron to swim" (R.V.). The LXX. has -ἐπεπόλασε, "brought to the surface." Von Gerlach says, "He thrust the -stick into the water, and raised the iron to the surface." - - - - - CHAPTER VII - - _ELISHA AND THE SYRIANS_ - - 2 KINGS vi. 1-23 - - "Now there was found in the city a poor wise man, and he by his - wisdom delivered the city."--ECCLES. ix. 15. - - -Elisha, unlike his master Elijah, was, during a great part of his long -career, intimately mixed up with the political and military fortunes -of his country. The king of Israel who occurs in the following -narratives is left nameless--always the sign of later and more vague -tradition; but he has usually been identified with Jehoram ben-Ahab, -and, though not without some misgivings, we shall assume that the -identification is correct. His dealings with Elisha never seem to have -been very cordial, though on one occasion he calls him "my father." -The relations between them at times became strained and even stormy. - -His reign was rendered miserable by the incessant infestation of Syrian -marauders. In these difficulties he was greatly helped by Elisha. The -prophet repeatedly frustrated the designs of the Syrian king by -revealing to Jehoram the places of Benhadad's ambuscades, so that -Jehoram could change the destination of his hunting parties or other -movements, and escape the plots laid to seize his person. Benhadad, -finding himself thus frustrated, and suspecting that it was due to -treachery, called his servants together in grief and indignation, and -asked who was the traitor among them. His officers assured him that they -were all faithful, but that the secrets whispered in his bed-chamber -were revealed to Jehoram by Elisha the prophet in Israel, whose fame had -spread into Syria, perhaps because of the cure of Naaman. The king, -unable to take any step while his counsels were thus published to his -enemies, thought--not very consistently--that he could surprise and -seize Elisha himself, and sent to find out where he was. At that time he -was living in Dothan, about twelve miles north-east of Samaria,[104] and -Benhadad sent a contingent with horses and chariots by night to surround -the city, and prevent any escape from its gates. That he could thus -besiege a town so near the capital shows the helplessness to which -Israel had been now reduced. - -When Elisha's servitor rose in the morning he was terrified to see the -Syrians encamped round the city, and cried to Elisha, "Alas! my -master, what shall we do?" - -"Fear not," said the prophet: "they that be with us are more than they -that be with them." He prayed God to grant the youth the same open eyes, -the same spiritual vision which he himself enjoyed; and the youth saw -the mountain full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha. - -This incident has been full of comfort to millions, as a beautiful -illustration of the truth that-- - - "The hosts of God encamp around - The dwellings of the just; - Deliverance He affords to all - Who on His promise trust. - - "Oh, make but trial of His love, - Experience will decide, - How blest are they, and only they, - Who in His truth confide." - -The youth's affectionate alarm had not been shared by his master. He -knew that to every true servant of God the promise will be fulfilled, -"He shall defend thee under His wings; thou shalt be safe under His -feathers; His righteousness and truth shall be thy shield and -buckler."[105] - -Were our eyes similarly opened, we too should see the reality of the -Divine protection and providence, whether under the visible form of -angelic ministrants or not. Scripture in general, and the Psalms in -particular, are full of the serenity inspired by this conviction. The -story of Elisha is a picture-commentary on the Psalmist's words: "The -angel of the Lord encampeth round them that fear Him, and delivereth -them."[106] "He shall give His angels charge over thee, to keep thee -in all thy ways."[107] "And I will encamp about Mine house because of -the army, because of him that passeth by, and because of him that -returneth: and no oppressor shall pass through them any more: for now -have I seen with Mine eyes."[108] "The angel of His presence saved -them: in His love and in His pity He redeemed them; and He bare them, -and carried them all the days of old."[109] - -But what is the exact meaning of all these lovely promises? They do not -mean that God's children and saints will always be shielded from anguish -or defeat, from the triumph of their enemies, or even from apparently -hopeless and final failure, or miserable death. The lesson is not that -their persons shall be inviolable, or that the enemies who advance -against them to eat up their flesh shall always stumble and fall. The -experiences of tens of thousands of troubled lives and martyred ends -instantly prove the futility of any such reading of these assurances. -The saints of God, the prophets of God, have died in exile and in -prison, have been tortured on the rack and broken on the wheel, and -burnt to ashes at innumerable stakes; they have been destitute, -afflicted, tormented, in their lives--stoned, beheaded, sawn asunder, in -every form of hideous death; they have rotted in miry dungeons, have -starved on desolate shores, have sighed out their souls into the -agonising flame. The Cross of Christ stands as the emblem and the -explanation of their lives, which fools count to be madness, and their -end without honour. On earth they have, far more often than not, been -crushed by the hatred and been delivered over to the will of their -enemies. Where, then, have been those horses and chariots of fire? - -They have been there no less than around Elisha at Dothan. The eyes -spiritually opened have seen them, even when the sword flashed, or the -flames wrapped them in indescribable torment. The sense of God's -protection has least deserted His saints when to the world's eyes they -seemed to have been most utterly abandoned. There has been a joy in -prisons and at stakes, it has been said, far exceeding the joy of -harvest. "Pray for me," said a poor boy of fifteen, who was being -burned at Smithfield in the fierce days of Mary Tudor. "I would as -soon pray for a dog as for a heretic like thee," answered one of the -spectators. "Then, Son of God, shine Thou upon me!" cried the -boy-martyr; and instantly, upon a dull and cloudy day, the sun shone -out, and bathed his young face in glory; whereat, says the -martyrologist, men greatly marvelled. But is there one death-bed of a -saint on which that glory has not shone? - -The presence of those horses and chariots of fire, unseen by the -carnal eye--the promises which, if they be taken literally, all -experience seems to frustrate--mean two things, which they who are the -heirs of such promises, and who would without them be of all men most -miserable, have clearly understood. - -They mean, first, that as long as a child of God is on the path of -duty, and until that duty has been fulfilled, he is inviolable and -invulnerable. He shall tread upon the lion and the adder; the young -lion and the dragon shall he trample under his feet. He shall take up -the serpent in his hands; and if he drink any deadly thing, it shall -not hurt him. He shall not be afraid of the terror by night, nor of -the arrow that flieth by day; of the pestilence that walketh in -darkness, nor of the demon that destroyeth in the noonday. A thousand -shall fall at his right hand, and ten thousand beside him; but it -shall not come nigh him. The histories and the legends of numberless -marvellous deliverances all confirm the truth that, when a man fears -the Lord, He will keep him in all his ways, and give His angels charge -over him, lest at any time he dash his foot against a stone. God will -not permit any mortal force, or any combination of forces, to hinder -the accomplishment of the task entrusted to His servant. It is the -sense of this truth which, under circumstances however menacing, -should enable us to - - "bate no jot - Of heart or hope, but still bear up, and steer - Uphillward" - -It is this conviction which has nerved men to face insuperable -difficulties, and achieve impossible and unhoped-for ends. It works in -the spirit of the cry, "Who art thou, O great mountain? Before -Zerubbabel be thou changed into a plain!" It inspires the faith as a -grain of mustard seed which is able to say to this mountain, "Be thou -removed, and be thou cast into the sea,"--and it shall obey. It stands -unmoved upon the pinnacle of the Temple whereon it has been placed, -while the enemy and the tempter, smitten by amazement, falls. In the -hour of difficulty it can cry,-- - - "Rescue me, O Lord, in this mine evil hour, - As of old so many by Thy mighty power,-- - Enoch and Elias from the common doom; - Noe from the waters in a saving home; - Abraham from the abounding guilt of heathenesse; - Job from all his multiform and fell distress; - Isaac when his faither's knife was raised to slay; - Lot from burning Sodom on the judgment day; - Moses from the land of bondage and despair; - Daniel from the hungry lions in their lair; - And the children three amid the furnace flame; - Chaste Susanna from the slander and the shame; - David from Golia, and the wrath of Saul; - And the two Apostles from their prison-thrall." - -The strangeness, the unexpectedness, the apparently inadequate source -of the deliverance, have deepened the trust that it has not been due -to accident. Once, when Felix of Nola was flying from his enemies, he -took refuge in a cave, and he had scarcely entered it before a spider -began to spin its web over the fissure. The pursuer, passing by, saw -the spider's web, and did not look into the cave; and the saint, as he -came out into safety, remarked: "_Ubi Deus est, ibi aranea murus, ubi -non est ibi murus aranea_" ("Where God is, a spider's web is as a -wall; where He is not, a wall is but as a spider's web"). - -This is one lesson conveyed in the words of Christ when the Pharisees -told Him that Herod desired to kill Him. He knew that Herod could not -kill Him till He had done His Father's will and finished His work. "Go -ye," He said, "and tell this fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and I do -cures to-day and to-morrow, and the third day I shall be perfected. -Nevertheless, I must walk to-day, and to-morrow, and the day following." - -But had all this been otherwise--had Felix been seized by his pursuers -and perished, as has been the common lot of God's prophets and -heroes--he would not therefore have felt himself mocked by these -exceeding great and precious promises. The chariots and horses of fire -are still there, and are there to work a deliverance yet greater and -more eternal. Their office is not to deliver the perishing body, but -to carry into God's glory the immortal soul. This is indicated in the -death-scene of Elijah. This was the vision of the dying Stephen. This -was what Christian legend meant when it embellished with beautiful -incidents such scenes as the death of Polycarp. This was what led -Bunyan to write, when he describes the death of Christian, that "all -the trumpets sounded for him on the other side." When poor Captain -Allan Gardiner lay starving to death in that Antarctic isle with his -wretched companions, he yet painted on the entrance of the cave which -had sheltered them, and near to which his remains were found, a hand -pointing downward at the words, "Though He slay me, yet will I put my -trust in Him." - -There was a touch of almost joyful humour in the way in which Elisha -proceeded to use, in the present emergency, the power of Divine -deliverance. He seems to have gone out of the town and down the hill -to the Syrian captains,[110] and prayed God to send them illusion -(ἀβλεψία), so that they might be misled.[111] Then he boldly said to -them, "You are being deceived: you have come the wrong way, and to the -wrong city. I will take you to the man whom ye seek." The incident -reminds us of the story of Athanasius, who, when he was being pursued -on the Nile, took the opportunity of a bend of the river boldly to -turn back his boat towards Alexandria. "Do you know where Athanasius -is?" shouted the pursuers. "He is not far off!" answered the disguised -Archbishop; and the emissaries of Constantius went on in the opposite -direction from that in which he made his escape. - -Elisha led the Syrians in their delusion straight into the city of -Samaria, where they suddenly found themselves at the mercy of the king -and his troops. Delighted at so great a chance of vengeance, Jehoram -eagerly exclaimed, "My father, shall I smite, shall I smite?" - -Certainly the request cannot be regarded as unnatural, when we remember -that in the Book of Deuteronomy, which did not come to light till after -this period, we read the rule that, when the Israelites had taken a -besieged city, "thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the -sword";[112] and that when Israel defeated the Midianites[113] they slew -all the males, and Moses was wroth with the officers of the host -because they had not also slain all the women. He then (as we are told) -ordered them to slay all except the virgins, and also--horrible to -relate--"_every male among the little ones_." The spirit of Elisha on -this occasion was larger and more merciful. It almost rose to the spirit -of Him who said, "It was said to them of old time, Thou shalt love thy -neighbour and hate thine enemy; but I say unto you, Love your enemies; -forgive them that hate you; do good unto them that despitefully use you -and persecute you." He asked Jehoram reproachfully whether he would even -have smitten those whom he had taken captive with sword and bow.[114] He -not only bade the king to spare them, but to set food before them, and -send them home. Jehoram did so at great expense, and the narrative ends -by telling us that the example of such merciful generosity produced so -favourable an impression that "the bands of Syria came no more into the -land of Israel." - -It is difficult, however, to see where this statement can be -chronologically fitted in. The very next chapter--so loosely is the -compilation put together, so completely is the sequence of events here -neglected--begins with telling us that Benhadad with all his host went -up and besieged Samaria. Any peace or respite gained by Elisha's -compassionate magnanimity must, in any case, have been exceedingly -short-lived. Josephus tries to get over the difficulty by drawing a -sufficiently futile distinction between marauding bands and a direct -invasion,[115] and he says that King Benhadad gave up his frays through -_fear_ of Elisha. But, in the first place, the encompassing of Dothan -had been carried out by "_a great host_ with horses and chariots," which -is hardly consistent with the notion of a foray, though it creates new -difficulties as to the numbers whom Elisha led to Samaria; secondly, the -substitution of a direct invasion for predatory incursions would have -been no gain to Israel, but a more deadly peril; and, thirdly, if it was -fear of Elisha which stopped the king's raids, it is strange that it had -no effect in preventing his invasions. We have, however, no data for any -final solution of these problems, and it is useless to meet them with a -network of idle conjectures. Such difficulties naturally occur in -narratives so vague and unchronological as those presented to us in the -documents from the story of Elisha which the compiler wove into his -history of Israel and Judah.[116] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[104] Gen. xxxvii. 17, _Dothain_, "two wells" (?). - -[105] Psalm xci. 4. - -[106] Psalm xxxiv. 7. - -[107] Psalm xci. 11. - -[108] Zech. ix. 8. - -[109] Isa. lxiii. 9. - -[110] Adopting the reading of the Syriac version: "And when they -[Elisha and his servant] came down to them [the Syrians]." The -ordinary reading is "to _him_," which makes the narrative less clear. - -[111] 2 Kings vi. 19. מַנְוֵרִים, ἀορασία, only found in Gen. xix. 11. - -[112] Deut. xx. 13. - -[113] Num. xxxi. 7. - -[114] Vulg., _Non percuties; neque enim cepisti eos ... ut percutias._ - -[115] Jos., _Antt._, IX. iv. 4, Κρύφα μὲν οὐκέτι ... φανερῶς δέ. - -[116] Kittel, following Kuenen, surmises that this story has got -misplaced; that it does not belong to the days of Jehoram ben-Ahab and -Benhadad II., but to the days of Jehoahaz ben-Jehu and Benhadad III., -the son of Hazael (_Gesch. der Hebr._, 249). In a very uncertain -question I have followed the conclusion arrived at by the majority of -scholars, ancient and modern. - - - - - CHAPTER VIII - - _THE FAMINE AND THE SIEGE_ - - 2 KINGS vi. 24-vii. 20 - - "'Tis truly no good plan when princes play - The vulture among carrion; but when - They play the carrion among vultures--that - Is ten times worse." - LESSING, _Nathan the Wise_, Act I., Sc. 3. - - -If the Benhadad, King of Syria, who reduced Samaria to the horrible -straits recorded in this chapter, (2 Kings vi.) was the same Benhadad -whom Ahab had treated with such impolitic confidence, his hatred -against Israel must indeed have burned hotly. Besides the affair at -Dothan, he had already been twice routed with enormous slaughter, and -against those disasters he could only set the death of Ahab at -Ramoth-Gilead. It is obvious from the preceding narrative that he -could advance at any time at his will and pleasure into the heart of -his enemy's country, and shut him up in his capital almost without -resistance. The siege-trains of ancient days were very inefficient, -and any strong fortress could hold out for years, if only it was well -provisioned. Such was not the case with Samaria, and it was reduced to -a condition of sore famine. Food so loathsome as an ass's head, which -at other times the poorest would have spurned, was now sold for eighty -shekels' weight of silver (about £8); and the fourth part of a -_xestes_ or _kab_--which was itself the smallest dry-measure, the -sixth part of a _seah_--of the coarse, common pulse, or roasted -chick-peas, vulgarly known as "dove's dung," fetched five shekels -(about 12_s._ 6_d._).[117] - -While things were at this awful pass, "the King of Israel," as he is -vaguely called throughout this story, went his rounds upon the wall to -visit the sentries and encourage the soldiers in their defence. As he -passed, a woman cried, "Help, my lord, O king!" In Eastern monarchies -the king is a judge of the humblest; a suppliant, however mean, may -cry to him. Jehoram thought that this was but one of the appeals which -sprang from the clamorous mendicity of famine with which he had grown -so painfully familiar. "The Lord curse you!" he exclaimed -impatiently.[118] "How can I help you? Every barn-floor is bare, every -wine-press drained." And he passed on. - -But the woman continued her wild clamour, and turning round at her -importunity, he asked, "What aileth thee?" - -He heard in reply a narrative as appalling as ever smote the ear of a -king in a besieged city. Among the curses denounced upon apostate Israel -in the Pentateuch, we read, "Ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and -the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat";[119] or, as it is expressed -more fully in the Book of Deuteronomy, "He shall besiege thee in all -thy gates throughout all thy land.... And thou shalt eat the fruit of -thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and thy daughters, which the Lord -thy God hath given thee, in the siege, and in the straitness wherewith -thine enemies shall distress thee: so that the man that is tender among -you, and very delicate, his eye shall be evil towards his brother, and -towards the wife of his bosom, and towards the remnant of his children -which he shall leave; so that he shall not give to any of them of the -flesh of his children whom he shall eat, because he hath nothing left -him in the siege.... The tender and delicate woman, which would not -adventure to set the sole of her foot upon the ground for delicateness -and tenderness, her eye shall be evil towards the husband of her bosom, -and towards her son, and towards her daughter, and towards her children: -for she shall eat them for want of all things secretly in the siege and -the straitness, if thou wilt not observe to do all the words of the law, -... that thou mayest fear the glorious and fearful name, _The Lord thy -God_."[120] We find almost the same words in the prophet Jeremiah;[121] -and in Lamentations we read: "The hands of the pitiful women have sodden -their own children: they were their meat in the destruction of the -daughter of My people."[122] - -Isaiah asks, "Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not -have compassion on the son of her womb?" Alas! it has always been so in -those awful scenes of famine, whether after shipwreck or in beleaguered -cities, when man becomes degraded to an animal, with all an animal's -primitive instincts, and when the wild beast appears under the thin -veneer of civilisation. So it was at the siege of Jerusalem, and at the -siege of Magdeburg, and at the wreck of the _Medusa_, and on many -another occasion when the pangs of hunger have corroded away every -vestige of the tender affections and of the moral sense. - -And this had occurred at Samaria: her women had become cannibals and -devoured their own little ones. - -"This woman," screamed the suppliant, pointing her lean finger at a -wretch like herself--"this woman said unto me, 'Give thy son, that we -may eat him to-day, and we will afterwards eat my son.' I yielded to -her suggestion. We killed my little son, and ate his flesh when we had -sodden it. Next day I said to her, 'Now give thy son, that we may eat -him'; and she hath hid her son!" - -How could the king answer such a horrible appeal? Injustice had been -done; but was he to order and to sanction by way of redress fresh -cannibalism, and the murder by its mother of another babe? In that -foul obliteration of every natural instinct, what could he do, what -could any man do? Can there be equity among raging wild beasts, when -they roar for their prey and are unfed? - -All that the miserable king could do was to rend his clothes in horror -and to pass on, and as his starving subjects passed by him on the wall -they saw that he wore sackcloth beneath his purple, in sign, if not of -repentance, yet of anguish, if not of prayer, yet of uttermost -humiliation.[123] - -But if indeed he had, in his misery, donned that sackcloth in order -that at least the semblance of self-mortification might move Jehovah -to pity, as it had done in the case of his father Ahab, the external -sign of his humility had done nothing to change his heart. The -gruesome appeal to which he had just been forced to listen only -kindled him to a burst of fury[124].The man who had warned, who had -prophesied, who so far during this siege had not raised his finger to -help--the man who was believed to be able to wield the powers of -heaven, and had wrought no deliverance for his people, but suffered -them to sink unaided into these depths of abjectness--should he be -permitted to live? If Jehovah would not help, of what use was Elisha? -"God do so to me, and more also," exclaimed Jehoram--using his -mother's oath to Elijah[125]--"if the head of Elisha, the son of -Shaphat, shall stand on him this day." - -Was this the king who had come to Elisha with such humble entreaty, -when three armies were perishing of thirst before the eyes of Moab? -Was this the king who had called Elisha "my father," when the prophet -had led the deluded host of Syrians into Samaria, and bidden Jehoram -to set large provision before them? It was the same king, but now -transported with fury and reduced to despair. His threat against God's -prophet was in reality a defiance of God, as when our unhappy -Plantagenet, Henry II., maddened by the loss of Le Mans, exclaimed -that, since God had robbed him of the town he loved, he would pay God -out by robbing Him of that which He most loved in him--his soul. - -Jehoram's threat was meant in grim earnest, and he sent an executioner -to carry it out. Elisha was sitting in his house with the elders of -the city, who had come to him for counsel at this hour of supreme -need. He knew what was intended for him, and it had also been revealed -to him that the king would follow his messenger to cancel his -sanguinary threat. "See ye," he said to the elders, "how this son of a -murderer"--for again he indicates his contempt and indignation for the -son of Ahab and Jezebel--"hath sent to behead me! When he comes, shut -the door, and hold it fast against him. His master is following hard -at his heels." - -The messenger came, and was refused admittance. The king followed -him,[126] and entering the room where the prophet and elders sat, he -gave up his wicked design of slaying Elisha with the sword, but he -overwhelmed him with reproaches, and in despair renounced all further -trust in Jehovah. Elisha, as the king's words imply, must have refused -all permission to capitulate: he must have held out from the first a -promise that God would send deliverance. But no deliverance had come. -The people were starving. Women were devouring their babes. Nothing -worse could happen if they flung open their gates to the Syrian host. -"Behold," the king said, "this evil is Jehovah's doing. You have -deceived us. Jehovah does not intend to deliver us. Why should I wait -for Him any longer?" Perhaps the king meant to imply that his mother's -Baal was better worth serving, and would never have left his votaries -to sink into these straits. - -And now man's extremity had come, and it was God's opportunity. Elisha -at last was permitted to announce that the worst was over, that the -next day plenty should smile on the besieged city. "Thus saith the -Lord," he exclaimed to the exhausted and despondent king, "To-morrow -about this time, instead of an ass's head being sold for eighty -shekels, and a thimbleful of pulse for five shekels, a peck of fine -flour shall be sold for a shekel, and two pecks of barley for a -shekel, in the gate of Samaria." - -The king was leaning on the hand of his chief officer, and to this -soldier the promise seemed not only incredible, but silly: for at the -best he could only suppose that the Syrian host would raise the siege; -and though to hope for that looked an absurdity, yet even that would -not in the least fulfil the immense prediction. He answered, -therefore, in utter scorn: "Yes! Jehovah is making windows in heaven! -But even thus could this be?" It is much as if he should have answered -some solemn pledge with a derisive proverb such as, "Yes! if the sky -should fall, we should catch larks!" - -Such contemptuous repudiation of a Divine promise was a blasphemy; and -answering scorn with scorn, and riddle with riddling, Elisha answers -the mocker, "Yes! and _you_ shall see this, but shall not enjoy it." - -The word of the Lord was the word of a true prophet, and the miracle -was wrought. Not only was the siege raised, but the wholly unforeseen -spoil of the entire Syrian camp, with all its accumulated rapine, -brought about the predicted plenty. - -There were four lepers[127] outside the gate of Samaria, like the -leprous mendicants who gather there to this day. They were cut off -from all human society, except their own. Leprosy was treated as -contagious, and if "houses of the unfortunate" (_Biut-el-Masákin_) -were provided for them, as seems to have been the case at Jerusalem, -they were built outside the city walls.[128] They could only live by -beggary, and this was an aggravation of their miserable condition. And -how could any one fling food to these beggars over the walls, when -food of any kind was barely to be had within them? - -So taking counsel of their despair, they decided that they would -desert to the Syrians: among them they would at least find food, if -their lives were spared; and if not, death would be a happy release -from their present misery. - -So in the evening twilight, when they could not be seen or shot at -from the city wall as deserters, they stole down to the Syrian camp. - -When they reached its outermost circle, to their amazement all was -silence. They crept into one of the tents in fear and astonishment. -There was food and drink there, and they satisfied the cravings of -their hunger. It was also stored with booty from the plundered cities -and villages of Israel. To this they helped themselves, and took it -away and hid it. Having spoiled this tent, they entered a second. It -was likewise deserted, and they carried a fresh store of treasures to -their hiding-place. And then they began to feel uneasy at not -divulging to their starving fellow-citizens the strange and golden -tidings of a deserted camp. The night was wearing on; day would reveal -the secret. If they carried the good news, they would doubtless earn a -rich guerdon. If they waited till morning, they might be put to death -for their selfish reticence and theft. It was safest to return to the -city, and rouse the warder, and send a message to the palace. So the -lepers hurried back through the night, and shouted to the sentinel at -the gate, "We went to the Syrian camp, and it was deserted! Not a man -was there, not a sound was to be heard. The horses were tethered -there, and the asses, and the tents were left just as they were." - -The sentinel called the other watchmen to hear the wonderful news, and -instantly ran with it to the palace. The slumbering house was roused; -and though it was still night, the king himself arose. But he could not -shake off his despondency, and made no reference to Elisha's prediction. -News sometimes sounds too good to be true. "It is only a decoy," he -said. "They can only have left their camp to lure us into an ambuscade, -that they may return, and slaughter us, and capture our city." - -"Send to see," answered one of his courtiers. "Send five horsemen to -test the truth, and to look out. If they perish, their fate is but the -fate of us all." - -So two chariots with horses were despatched, with instructions not -only to visit the camp, but track the movements of the host. - -They went, and found that it was as the lepers had said. The camp was -deserted, and lay there as an immense booty; and for some reason the -Syrians had fled towards the Jordan to make good their escape to -Damascus by the eastern bank. The whole road was strewn with the traces -of their headlong flight; it was full of scattered garments and vessels. - -Probably, too, the messengers came across some disabled fugitive, and -learnt the secret of this amazing stampede. It was the result of one of -those sudden unaccountable panics to which the huge, unwieldy, -heterogeneous Eastern armies, which have no organised system of -sentries, and no trained discipline, are constantly liable. We have -already met with several instances in the history of Israel. Such was -the panic which seized the Midianites when Gideon's three hundred blew -their trumpets; and the panic of the Syrians before Ahab's pages of the -provinces; and of the combined armies in the Valley of Salt; and of the -Moabites at Wady-el-Ahsy; and afterwards of the Assyrians before the -walls of Jerusalem. Fear is physically contagious, and, when once it has -set in, it swells with such unaccountable violence, that the Greeks -called these terrors "panic," because they believed them to be directly -inspired by the god Pan. Well-disciplined as was the army of the Ten -Thousand Greeks in their famous retreat, they nearly fell victims to a -sudden panic, had not Clearchus, with prompt resource, published by the -herald the proclamation of a reward for the arrest of the man who had -let the ass loose. Such an unaccountable terror--caused by a noise as of -chariots and of horses which reverberated among the hills--had seized -the Syrian host. They thought that Jehoram had secretly hired an army of -the princes of the Khetas[129] and of the Egyptians to march suddenly -upon them. In wild confusion, not stopping to reason or to inquire, they -took to flight, increasing their panic by the noise and rush of their -own precipitance. - -No sooner had the messengers delivered their glad tidings, than the -people of Samaria began to pour tumultuously out of the gates, to -fling themselves on the food and on the spoil. It was like the rush of -the dirty, starving, emaciated wretches which horrified the keepers -of the reserved stores at Smolensk in Napoleon's retreat from Moscow, -and forced them to shut the gates, and fling food and grain to the -struggling soldiers out of the windows of the granaries. To secure -order and prevent disaster, the king appointed his attendant lord to -keep the gate. But the torrent of people flung him down, and they -trampled on his body in their eagerness for relief. He died after -having seen that the promise of Elisha was fulfilled, and that the -cheapness and abundance had been granted, the prophecy of which he -thought only fit for his sceptical derision. - -"The sudden panic which delivered the city," says Dean Stanley, "is -the one marked intervention on behalf of the northern capital. No -other incident could be found in the sacred annals so appropriately to -express, in the Church of Gouda, the pious gratitude of the citizens -of Leyden, for their deliverance from the Spanish army, as the -miraculous raising of the siege of Samaria."[130] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[117] So _asafœtida_ is called "devil's dung" in Germany; and the _Herba -alcali_, "sparrow's dung" by Arabs. The _Q'ri_, however, supports the -_literal_ meaning; and compare 2 Kings xviii. 27; Jos., _B. J._, V. -xiii. 7. Analogies for these prices are quoted from classic authors. -Plutarch (_Artax._, xxiv.) mentions a siege in which an ass's head could -hardly be got for sixty drachmas (£2 10_s._), though usually the whole -animal only cost £1. Pliny (_H. N._, viii. 57) says that during -Hannibal's siege of Casilinum a mouse sold for £6 5_s._ - -[118] So Clericus. Comp. Jos. ἐπηράσατο αὐτῇ. - -[119] Lev. xxvi. 29. - -[120] Deut. xxviii. 52-58. - -[121] Jer. xix. 9. - -[122] Lam. iv. 10: comp. ii. 20; Ezek. v. 10; Jos., _B. J._, VI. iii. 4. - -[123] 1 Kings xxi. 27; Isa. xx. 2, 3. - -[124] Compare the wrath of Pashur the priest in consequence of the -denunciation of Jeremiah (Jer. xx. 2). - -[125] 1 Kings xix. 2. - -[126] In 2 Kings vi. 33 we should read _melek_ (king) for _maleak_ -(messenger). Jehoram repented of his hasty order. - -[127] The Jews say Gehazi, and his three sons (Jarchi). - -[128] Lev. xiii. 46; Num. v. 2, 3. - -[129] The capitals of the ancient Hittites--a nation whose fame had -been almost entirely obliterated till a few years ago--were -Karchemish, Kadesh, Hamath, and Helbon (Aleppo). - -[130] _Lectures_, ii. 345. - - - - - CHAPTER IX - - _THE SHUNAMMITE AND HAZAEL_ - - 2 KINGS viii. 1-6, 7-15. (Circ. B.C. 886.) - - "Our acts still follow with us from afar, - And what we have been makes us what we are." - GEORGE ELIOT. - - -The next anecdote of Elisha brings us once more into contact with the -Lady of Shunem. Famines, or dearths, were unhappily of very frequent -occurrence in a country which is so wholly dependent, as Palestine is, -upon the early and latter rain. On some former occasion Elisha had -foreseen that "Jehovah had called for a famine"; for the sword, the -famine, and the pestilence are represented as ministers who wait His -bidding.[131] He had also foreseen that it would be of long duration, -and in kindness to the Shunammite had warned her that she had better -remove for a time into a land in which there was greater plenty. It -was under similar circumstances that Elimelech and Naomi, ancestors of -David's line, had taken their sons Mahlon and Chilion, and gone to -live in the land of Moab; and, indeed, the famine which decided the -migration of Jacob and his children into Egypt had been a -turning-point in the history of the Chosen People. - -The Lady of Shunem had learnt by experience the weight of Elisha's -words. Her husband is not mentioned, and was probably dead; so she -arose with her household, and went for seven years to live in the -plain of Philistia. At the end of that time the dearth had ceased, and -she returned to Shunem, but only to find that during her absence her -house and land were in possession of other owners, and had probably -escheated to the Crown. The king was the ultimate, and to a great -extent the only, source of justice in his little kingdom, and she went -to lay her claim before him and demand the restitution of her -property. By a providential circumstance she came exactly at the most -favourable moment. The king--it must have been Jehoram--was at the -very time talking to Gehazi about the great works of Elisha. As it is -unlikely that he would converse long with a leper, and as Gehazi is -still called "the servant of the man of God," the incident may here be -narrated out of order. It is pleasant to find Jehoram taking so deep -an interest in the prophet's story. Already on many occasions during -his wars with Moab and Syria, as well as on the occasion of Naaman's -visit, if that had already occurred, he had received the completest -proof of the reality of Elisha's mission, but he might be naturally -unaware of the many private incidents in which he had exhibited a -supernatural power. Among other stories Gehazi was telling him that of -the Shunammite, and how Elisha had given life to her dead son. At that -juncture she came before the king, and Gehazi said, "My lord, O king, -this is the very woman, and this is her son whom Elisha recalled to -life." In answer to Jehoram's questions she confirmed the story, and -he was so much impressed by the narrative that he not only ordered -the immediate restitution of her land, but also of the value of its -products during the seven years of her exile. - -We now come to the fulfilment of the second of the commands which -Elijah had received so long before at Horeb. To complete the -retribution which was yet to fall on Israel, he had been bidden to -anoint Hazael to be king of Syria in the room of Benhadad. Hitherto -the mandate had remained unfulfilled, because no opportunity had -occurred; but the appointed time had now arrived. Elisha, for some -purpose, and during an interval of peace, visited Damascus, where the -visit of Naaman and the events of the Syrian wars had made his name -very famous. Benhadad II., grandson or great-grandson of Rezin, after -a stormy reign of some thirty years, marked by some successes, but -also by the terrible reverses already recorded, lay dangerously ill. -Hearing the news that the wonder-working prophet of Israel was in his -capital, he sent to ask of him the question, "Shall I recover?" It had -been the custom from the earliest days to propitiate the favour of -prophets by presents, without which even the humblest suppliant hardly -ventured to approach them.[132] The gift sent by Benhadad was truly -royal, for he thought perhaps that he could purchase the intercession -or the miraculous intervention of this mighty thaumaturge. He sent -Hazael with a selection "of every good thing of Damascus," and, like -an Eastern, he endeavoured to make his offering seem more -magnificent[133] by distributing it on the backs of forty camels. - -At the head of this imposing procession of camels walked Hazael, the -commander of the forces, and stood in Elisha's presence with the -humble appeal, "Thy son Benhadad, King of Syria, hath sent me to thee, -saying, Shall I recover of this disease?" - -About the king's munificence we are told no more, but we cannot doubt -that it was refused. If Naaman's still costlier blessing had been -rejected, though he was about to receive through Elisha's ministration -an inestimable boon, it is unlikely that Elisha would accept a gift -for which he could offer no return, and which, in fact, directly or -indirectly, involved the death of the sender. But the historian does -not think it necessary to pause and tell us that Elisha sent back the -forty camels unladen of their treasures. It was not worth while to -narrate what was a matter of course. If it had been no time, a few -years earlier, to receive money and garments, and olive-yards and -vineyards, and men-servants and maid-servants, still less was it a -time to do so now. The days were darker now than they had been, and -Elisha himself stood near the Great White Throne. The protection of -these fearless prophets lay in their utter simplicity of soul. They -rose above human fears because they stood above human desires. What -Elisha possessed was more than sufficient for the needs of the plain -and humble life of one whose communing was with God. It was not -wonderful that prophets should rise to an elevation whence they could -look down with indifference upon the superfluities of the lust of the -eyes and the pride of life, when even sages of the heathen have -attained to a similar independence of earthly luxuries. One who can -climb such mountain-heights can look with silent contempt on gold. - -But there is a serious difficulty about Elisha's answer to the -embassage. "Go, say unto him"--so it is rendered in our Authorised -Version--"Thou mayest certainly recover: howbeit the Lord hath showed -me that he shall surely die." - -It is evident that the translators of 1611 meant the emphasis to be -laid on the "_mayest_," and understood the answer of Elisha to mean, -"Thy recovery is quite possible; and yet"--he adds to Hazael, and not -as part of his answer to the king--"Jehovah has shown me that dying he -shall die,"--not indeed of this disease, but by other means before he -has recovered from it. - -Unfortunately, however, the Hebrew will not bear this meaning. Elisha -bids Hazael to go back with the distinct message, "Thou shalt surely -recover," as it is rightly rendered in the Revised Version. - -This, however, is the rendering, not of the _written_ text as it stands, -but of the margin. Every one knows that in the Masoretic original the -text itself is called the K'thîb, or "what is written," whereas the -margin is called _Q'rî_, "read." Now, our translators, both those of -1611 and those of the Revision Committee, all but invariably follow the -Kethîb as the most authentic reading. In this instance, however, they -abandon the rule and translate the marginal reading. - -What, then, is the written text? - -It is the reverse of the marginal reading, for it has: "Go, say, Thou -shalt _not_ recover." - -The reader may naturally ask the cause of this startling discrepancy. - -It seems to be twofold. - -(I.) Both the Hebrew word _lo_, "not" (לֹא), and the word _lo_, "to -him" (לוֹ), have precisely the same pronunciation. Hence this text -might mean either "Go, say _to him_, Thou shalt certainly recover," or -"Go, say, Thou shalt _not_ recover." The same identity of the -negative and the dative of the preposition has made nonsense of -another passage of the Authorised Version, where "Thou hast multiplied -the nation, and _not_ increased the joy: they joy before Thee -according to the joy of harvest," should be "Thou hast multiplied the -nation, and increased _its_ joy." So, too, the verse "It is He that -hath made us, and _not_ we ourselves," may mean "It is He that hath -made us, and _to Him_ we belong." In the present case the adoption of -the negative (which would have conveyed to Benhadad the exact truth) -is not possible; for it makes the next clause and its introduction by -the word "Howbeit" entirely meaningless. - -But (II.) this confusion in the text might not have arisen in the -present instance but for the difficulty of Elisha's appearing to send -a deliberately false message to Benhadad, and a message which he tells -Hazael at the time is false. - -Can this be deemed impossible? - -With the views prevalent in "those times of ignorance," I think not. -Abraham and Isaac, saints and patriarchs as they were, both told -practical falsehoods about their wives. They, indeed, were reproved -for this, though not severely; but, on the other hand, Jael is not -reproved for her treachery to Sisera; and Samuel, under the semblance -of a Divine permission, used a diplomatic ruse when he visited the -household of Jesse; and in the apologue of Micaiah a lying spirit is -represented as sent forth to do service to Jehovah; and Elisha himself -tells a deliberate falsehood to the Syrians at Dothan. The -sensitiveness to the duty of always speaking the exact truth is not -felt in the East with anything like the intensity that it is in -Christian lands; and reluctant as we should be to find in the message -of Elisha another instance of that _falsitas dispensativa_ which has -been so fatally patronised by some of the Fathers and by many Romish -theologians, the love of truth itself would compel us to accept this -view of the case, if there were no other possible interpretation. - -I think, however, that another view is possible. I think that Elisha -may have said to Hazael, "Go, say unto him, Thou shalt surely -recover," with the same accent of irony in which Micaiah said at first -to the two kings, "Go up to Ramoth-Gilead, and prosper; for the Lord -shall deliver it into the hand of the king." I think that his whole -manner and the tone of his voice may have shown to Hazael, and may -have been meant to show him, that this was not Elisha's real message -to Benhadad. Or, to adopt the same line of explanation with an -unimportant difference, Elisha may have meant to imply, "Go, follow -the bent which I know you _will_ follow; go, carry back to your master -the lying message that I said he would recover. But that is not _my_ -message. My message, whether it suits your courtier instincts or not, -is that Jehovah has warned me that he shall surely die." - -That some such meaning as this attaches to the verse seems to be shown -by the context. For not only was some reproof involved in Elisha's -words, but he showed his grief still more by his manner. It was as -though he had said, "Take back what message you choose, but Benhadad -will certainly die"; and then he fastened his steady gaze on the -soldier's countenance, till Hazael blushed and became uneasy. Only -when he noted that Hazael's conscience was troubled by the glittering -eyes which seemed to read the inmost secrets of his heart did Elisha -drop his glance, and burst into tears. "Why weepeth, my lord?" asked -Hazael, in still deeper uneasiness. Whereupon Elisha revealed to him -the future. "I weep," he said, "because I see in thee the curse and -the avenger of the sins of my native land. Thou wilt become to them a -sword of God; thou wilt set their fortresses on fire; thou wilt -slaughter their youths; thou wilt dash their little ones to pieces -against the stones; thou wilt rip up their women with child." That he -actually inflicted these savageries of warfare on the miserable -Israelites we are not told, but we are told that he smote them in all -their coasts; that Jehovah delivered them into his hands; that he -oppressed Israel all the days of Jehoahaz.[134] That being so, there -can be no question that he carried out the same laws of atrocious -warfare which belonged to those times and continued long afterwards. -Such atrocities were not only inflicted on the Israelites again and -again by the Assyrians and others,[135] but they themselves had often -inflicted them, and inflicted them with what they believed to be -Divine approval, on their own enemies.[136] Centuries after, one of -their own poets accounted it a beatitude to him who should dash the -children of the Babylonians against the stones.[137] - -As the answer of Hazael is usually read and interpreted, we are taught -to regard it as an indignant declaration that he could never be guilty -of such vile deeds. It is regarded as though it were "an abhorrent -repudiation of his future self." The lesson often drawn from it in -sermons is that a man may live to do, and to delight in, crimes which -he once hated and deemed it impossible that he should ever commit. - -The lesson is a most true one, and is capable of a thousand -illustrations. It conveys the deeply needed warning that those who, -even in thought, dabble with wrong courses, which they only regard as -venial peccadilloes, may live to commit, without any sense of horror, -the most enormous offences. It is the explanation of the terrible fact -that youths who once seemed innocent and holy-minded may grow up, step -by step, into colossal criminals. "Men," says Scherer, "advance -unconsciously from errors to faults, and from faults to crimes, till -sensibility is destroyed by the habitual spectacle of guilt, and the -most savage atrocities come to be dignified by the name of State -policy." - - "Lui-même à son portrait forcé de rendre hommage, - Il frémira d'horreur devant sa propre image." - -But true and needful as these lessons are, they are entirely beside the -mark as deduced from the story of Hazael. What he said was not, as in -our Authorised Version, "But what, is thy servant a dog, that he should -do this great thing?" nor by "great thing" does he mean "so deadly a -crime." His words, more accurately rendered in our Revision, are, "But -what is thy servant, which is but a dog, that he should do this great -thing?" or, "But what is the dog, thy servant?" It was a hypocritic -deprecation of the future importance and eminence which Elisha had -prophesied for him. There is not the least sense of horror either in his -words or in his thoughts. He merely means "A mere dog, such as I am, can -never accomplish such great designs." A dog in the East is utterly -despised;[138] and Hazael, with Oriental irony, calls himself a dog, -though he was the Syrian Commander-in-chief--just as a Chinaman, in -speaking of himself, adopts the periphrasis "this little thief." - -Elisha did not notice his sham humility, but told him, "The Lord hath -showed me that thou shalt be King over Syria." The date of the event -was B.C. 886. - -The scene has sometimes been misrepresented to Elisha's discredit, as -though he suggested to the general the crimes of murder and rebellion. -The accusation is entirely untenable. Elisha was, indeed, in one -sense, commissioned to anoint Hazael King of Syria, because the cruel -soldier had been predestined by God to that position; but, in another -sense, he had no power whatever to give to Hazael the mighty kingdom -of Aram, nor to wrest it from the dynasty which had now held it for -many generations. All this was brought about by the Divine purpose, in -a course of events entirely out of the sphere of the humble man of -God. In the transferring of this crown he was in no sense the agent or -the suggester. The thought of usurpation must, without doubt, have -been already in Hazael's mind. Benhadad, as far as we know, was -childless. At any rate he had no natural heirs, and seems to have been -a drunken king, whose reckless undertakings and immense failures had -so completely alienated the affections of his subjects from himself -and his dynasty, that he died undesired and unlamented, and no hand -was uplifted to strike a blow in his defence. It hardly needed a -prophet to foresee that the sceptre would be snatched by so strong a -hand as that of Hazael from a grasp so feeble as that of Benhadad II. -The utmost that Elisha had done was, under Divine guidance, to read -his character and his designs, and to tell him that the accomplishment -of these designs was near at hand. - -So Hazael went back to Benhadad, and in answer to the eager inquiry, -"What said Elisha to thee?" he gave the answer which Elisha had -foreseen that he meant to give, and which was in any case a falsehood, -for it suppressed half of what Elisha had really said. "He told me," -said Hazael, "that thou shouldest surely recover." - -Was the sequel of the interview the murder of Benhadad by Hazael? - -The story has usually been so read, but Elisha had neither prophesied -this nor suggested it. The sequel is thus described. "And it came to -pass on the morrow, that _he_ took the coverlet,[139] and dipped it in -water, and spread it on his face, so that he died: and Hazael reigned -in his stead." The repetition of the name Hazael in the last clause is -superfluous if he was the subject of the previous clause, and it has -been consequently conjectured that "he took" is merely the impersonal -idiom "one took." Some suppose that, as Benhadad was in the bath, his -servant took the bath-cloth, wetted it, and laid its thick folds over -the mouth of the helpless king; others, that he soaked the thick -quilt, which the king was too weak to lift away.[140] In either case -it is hardly likely that a great officer like Hazael would have been -in the bath-room or the bed-room of the dying king. Yet we must -remember that the Prætorian Præfect Macro is said to have suffocated -Tiberius with his bed-clothes. Josephus says that Hazael strangled his -master with a net; and, indeed, he has generally been held guilty of -the perpetration of the murder. But it is fair to give him the benefit -of the doubt. Be that as it may, he seems to have reigned for some -forty-six years (B.C. 886-840), and to have bequeathed the sceptre to -a son on whom he had bestowed the old dynastic name of Benhadad. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[131] Jer. xxv. 29; Ezek. xxxviii. 21. - -[132] See the cases of Samuel (1 Sam. ix. 7), of Ahijah (1 Kings xiv. -3), and of Elisha himself (2 Kings iv. 42). - -[133] As Jacob did in sending forward his present to Esau. Comp. -Chardin, _Voyages_, iii. 217. - -[134] 2 Kings x. 32, xiii. 3, 22. - -[135] Isa. xiii. 15, 16; Hos. x. 14, xiii. 16; Nah. iii. 10. - -[136] See Josh. vi. 17, 21; 1 Sam. xv. 3; Lev. xxvii. 28, 29. - -[137] Psalm cxxxvii. 9. - -[138] 1 Sam. xxiv. 14; 2 Sam. ix. 8. - -[139] מַכְבֵּר Jos., _Antt._, IX. iv. 6, δίκτυον διάβροχον. Aquila, -Symmachus, τὸ στρῶμα. Michaelis supposed it to be the mosquito-net -(κωνωπεῖον). Comp. 1 Sam. xix. 13. Ewald suggested "bath-mattress" -(iii. 523). Sir G. Grove (_s.v._ "Elisha," _Bibl. Dict._, ii. 923) -mentions that Abbas Pasha is said to have been murdered in the same -manner. Some, however, think that the measure was taken by way of cure -(Bruce, _Travels_, iii. 33. Klostermann, _ad loc._, alters the text at -his pleasure). - -[140] 2 Kings viii. 15; LXX., τὸ μαχβάρ; Vulg., _stragulum_; lit., -"woven cloth." - - - - - CHAPTER X - - (1) _JEHORAM BEN-JEHOSHAPHAT OF JUDAH_ - - B.C. 851-843 - - (2) _AHAZIAH BEN-JEHORAM OF JUDAH_ - - B.C. 843-842 - - 2 KINGS viii. 16-24, 25-29 - - "Bear like the Turk, no brother near the throne."--POPE. - - -The narrative now reverts to the kingdom of Judah, of which the -historian, mainly occupied with the great deeds of the prophet in -Israel, takes at this period but little notice. - -He tells us that in the fifth year of Jehoram of Israel, son of Ahab, -his namesake and brother-in-law, Jehoram of Judah, began to reign in -Judah, though his father, Jehoshaphat, was then king.[141] - -The statement is full of difficulties, especially as we have been -already told (i. 17) that Jehoram ben-Ahab of Israel began to reign in -the _second_ year of Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat of Judah, and (iii. 1) -in the eighteenth year of Jehoshaphat. It is hardly worth while to -pause here to disentangle these complexities in a writer who, like -most Eastern historians, is content with loose chronological -references. By the current mode of reckoning, the twenty-five years of -Jehoshaphat's reign may merely mean twenty-three and a month or two of -two other years; and some suppose that, when Jehoram of Judah was -about sixteen, his father went on the expedition against Moab, and -associated his son with him in the throne. This is only conjecture. -Jehoshaphat, of all kings, least needed a coadjutor, particularly so -weak and worthless a one as his son; and though the association of -colleagues with themselves has been common in some realms, there is -not a single instance of it in the history of Israel and Judah--the -case of Uzziah, who was a leper, not being to the point.[142] - -The kings both of Israel and of Judah at this period, with the single -exception of the brave and good Jehoshaphat, were unworthy and -miserable. The blight of the Jezebel-marriage and the curse of -Baal-worship lay upon both kingdoms. It is scarcely possible to find -such wretched monarchs as the two sons of Jezebel--Ahaziah and Jehoram -in Israel, and the son-in-law and grandson of Jezebel, Jehoram and -Ahaziah, in Judah. Their respective reigns are annals of shameful -apostasy, and almost unbroken disaster. - -Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat of Judah was thirty-two years old when he -began his independent reign, and reigned for eight deplorable years. -The fact that his mother's name is (exceptionally) omitted seems to -imply that his father Jehoshaphat set the good example of -monogamy.[143] Jehoram was wholly under the influence of Athaliah, his -wife, and of Jezebel, his mother-in-law, and he introduced into Judah -their alien abominations. He "walked in their way, and did evil in the -sight of the Lord." The Chronicler fills up the general remark by -saying that he did his utmost to foster idolatry by erecting _bamoth_ -in the mountains of Judah, and compelled his people to worship there, -in order to decentralise the religious services of the kingdom, and so -to diminish the glory of the Temple. He introduced Baal-worship into -Judah, and either he or his son was the guilty builder of a temple to -Baalim, not only on the "opprobrious mount" on which stood the -idolatrous chapels of Solomon, but on the Hill of the House itself. -This temple had its own high priest, and was actually adorned with -treasures torn from the Temple of Jehovah.[144] So bad was Jehoram's -conduct that the historian can only attribute his non-destruction to -the "covenant of salt" which God had made with David, "to give him a -lamp for his children always." - -But if actual destruction did not come upon him and his race, he came -very near such a fate, and he certainly experienced that "the path of -transgressors is hard." There is nothing to record about him but crime -and catastrophe. First Edom revolted. Jehoshaphat had subdued the -Edomites, and only allowed them to be governed by a vassal; now they -threw off the yoke. The Jewish King advanced against them to "Zair"--by -which must be meant apparently either Zoar (through which the road to -Edom lay), or their capital, Mount Seir.[145] There he was surrounded by -the Edomite hosts; and though by a desperate act of valour he cut his -way through them at night in spite of their reserve of chariots, yet his -army left him in the lurch.[146] Edom succeeded in establishing its -final independence, to which we see an allusion in the one hope held out -to Esau by Isaac in that "blessing" which was practically a curse. - -The loss of so powerful a subject-territory, which now constituted a -source of danger on the eastern frontier of Judah, was succeeded by -another disaster on the south-west, in the Shephelah or lowland plain. -Here Libnah revolted,[147] and by gaining its autonomy contracted yet -farther the narrow limits of the southern kingdom. - -The Book of Kings tells us no more about the Jewish Jehoram, only -adding that he died and was buried with his fathers, and was succeeded -by his son Ahaziah. But the Book of Chronicles, which adds far darker -touches to his character, also heightens to an extraordinary degree -the intensity of his punishment. It tells us that he began his reign -by the atrocious murder of his six younger brothers, for whom, -following the old precedent of Rehoboam, Jehoshaphat had provided by -establishing them as governors of various cities. As his throne was -secure, we cannot imagine any motive for this brutal massacre except -the greed of gain, and we can only suppose that, as Jehoram -ben-Jehoshaphat became little more than a friendly vassal of his -kinsmen in Israel, so he fell under the deadly influence of his wife -Athaliah, as completely as his father-in-law had done under the spell -of her mother Jezebel. With his brothers he also swept away a number -of the chief nobles, who perhaps embraced the cause of his murdered -kinsmen. Such conduct breathes the known spirit of Jezebel and of -Athaliah. To rebuke him for this wickedness, he received the menace of -a tremendous judgment upon his home and people in a writing from -_Elijah_, whom we should certainly have assumed to be dead long before -that time. The judgment itself followed. The Philistines and Arabians -invaded Judah, captured Jerusalem, and murdered all Jehoram's own -children, except Ahaziah, who was the youngest. Then Jehoram, at the -age of thirty-eight, was smitten with an incurable disease of the -bowels, of which he died two years later, and not only died -unlamented, but was refused burial in the sepulchres of the kings. In -any case his reign and that of his son and successor were the most -miserable in the annals of Judah, as the reigns of their namesakes and -kinsmen, Ahaziah ben-Ahab and Jehoram ben-Ahab, were also the most -miserable in the annals of Israel. - -Jehoram was succeeded on the throne of Judah by his son Ahaziah. If -the chronology and the facts be correct, Ahaziah ben-Jehoram of Judah -must have been born when his father was only eighteen, though he was -the youngest of the king's sons, and so escaped from being massacred -in the Philistine invasion. He succeeded at the age of twenty-two, -and only reigned a single year. During this year his mother, the -Gebîrah Athaliah, the daughter of Ahab and Jezebel, and granddaughter -of the Tyrian Ethbaal, was all-supreme. She bent the weak nature of -her son to still further apostasies. She was "his counsellor to do -wickedly," and her Baal-priest Mattan was more important than the -Aaronic high priest of the despised and desecrated Temple. Never did -Judah sink to so low a level, and it was well that the days of Ahaziah -of Judah were cut short. - -The only event in his reign was the share he took with his uncle -Jehoram of Israel in his campaign to protect Ramoth-Gilead from -Hazael. The expedition seems to have been successful in its main -purpose. Ramoth-Gilead, the key to the districts of Argob and Bashan, -was of immense importance for commanding the country beyond Jordan. It -seems to be the same as Ramath-Mizpeh (Josh. xiii. 26); and if so, it -was the spot where Jacob made his covenant with Laban. Ahab, or his -successors, in spite of the disastrous end of the expedition to Ahab -personally, had evidently recovered the frontier fortress from the -Syrian king.[148] Its position upon a hill made its possession vital -to the interests of Gilead; for the master of Ramah was the master of -that Trans-Jordanic district. But Hazael had succeeded his murdered -master, and was already beginning to fulfil the ruthless mission which -Elisha had foreseen with tears. Jehoram ben-Ahab seems to have held -his own against Hazael for a time; but in the course of the campaign -at Ramoth he was so severely wounded that he was compelled to leave -his army under the command of Jehu, and to return to Jezreel, to be -healed of his wounds. Thither his nephew Ahaziah of Judah went to -visit him; and there, as we shall hear, he too met his doom. That -fate, the Chronicler tells us, was the penalty of his iniquities. "The -destruction of Ahaziah was of God by coming to Joram." - -We have no ground for accusing either king of any want of courage; yet -it was obviously impolitic of Jehoram to linger unnecessarily in his -luxurious capital, while the army of Israel was engaged in service on -a dangerous frontier. The wounds inflicted by the Syrian archers may -have been originally severe. Their arrows at this time played as -momentous a part in history as the cloth-yard shafts of our English -bowmen which "sewed the French ranks together" at Poictiers, Creçy, -and Azincour. But Jehoram had at any rate so far recovered that he -could ride in his chariot; and if he had been wise and bravely -vigorous, he would not have left his army under a subordinate at so -perilous an epoch, and menaced by so resolute a foe. Or if he were -indeed compelled to consult the better physicians at Jezreel, he -should have persuaded his nephew Ahaziah of Judah--who seems to have -been more or less of a vassal as well as a kinsman--to keep an eye on -the beleaguered fort. Both kings, however, deserted their -post,--Jehoram to recover perfect health; and Ahaziah, who had been -his comrade--as their father and grandfather had gone together to the -same war--to pay a state visit of condolence to the royal invalid. The -army was left under a popular, resolute, and wholly unscrupulous -commander, and the results powerfully affected the immediate and the -ultimate destiny of both kingdoms. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[141] The following genealogy may help to elucidate the troublesome -identity of names:-- - - OMRI - ____|____ - | | JEHOSHAPHAT - Ahab = Jezebel | - _______|__________________ | - | | | | - Ahaziah Jehoram Athaliah = Jehoram - (of Israel). (of Israel). | (of Judah). - | - Ahaziah - (of Judah). - - -[142] Jotham ben-Uzziah was not the colleague of his father, but his -public representative. - -[143] The only other king of Judah whose mother's name is not mentioned -(perhaps because his father Jotham had but one wife) is Ahaz. - -[144] 2 Kings xi. 18; 2 Chron. xxi. 11, xxiv. 7. - -[145] Vulg., _Seira_; Arab., _Sa'ir_ (but the historian never uses the -name Mount Seir); LXX., Σιώρ. There is perhaps some corruption in the -text, and the reading of the Chronicler "with his princes" shows that -it may have once been צַמ־שָׂרָיו. - -[146] 2 Kings viii. 21. "The people" (_i.e._, the army of Judah) "fled -to their tents." Apparently this means that they slunk away home. The -word "tents" is a reminiscence of their nomad days, like the -treasonable cry, "To your tents, O Israel." - -[147] Josh. x. 29-39. - -[148] Jos., _Antt._, IX. vi. 1. - - - - - CHAPTER XI - - _THE REVOLT OF JEHU_ - - B.C. 842 - - 2 KINGS ix. 1-37 - - "Te semper anteit sæva Necessitas - Clavos trabales et cuneos manu, - Gestans ahenâ." - HORAT., _Od._, I. xxxv. 17. - - -A long period had elapsed since Elijah had received the triple -commission which was to mark the close of his career. Two of those -Divine behests had now been accomplished. He had anointed Elisha, son -of Shaphat, of Abel-Meholah, to be prophet in his room;[149] and -Elisha had anointed Hazael to be king over Syria;[150] the third and -more dangerous commission, involving nothing less than the overthrow -of the mighty dynasty of Omri, remained still unaccomplished. - -If the name of Jehu ("Jehovah is He")[151] had been actually mentioned -to Elijah, the dreadful secret must have remained buried in the breast -of the prophet and in that of his successor for many years. Further, -Jehu was yet a very young man, and to have marked him out as the -founder of a dynasty would have been to doom him to certain -destruction. An Eastern king, whose family has once securely seated -itself on the throne, is hedged round with an awful divinity, and -demands an unquestioning obedience. Elijah had been removed from earth -before this task had been fulfilled, and Elisha had to wait for his -opportunity. But the doom was passed, though the judgment was belated. -The sons of Ahab were left a space to repent, or to fill to the brim -the cup of their father's iniquities. - - "The sword of Heaven is not in haste to smite, - Nor yet doth linger." - -Ahaziah, Ahab's eldest son, after a reign of one year, marked only by -crimes and misfortunes, had ended in overwhelming disaster his -deplorable career. His brother Jehoram had succeeded him, and had now -been on the throne for at least twelve years, which had been chiefly -signalised by that unsuccessful attempt to recover the territory of -revolted Moab, to which we owe the celebrated Stone of Mesha. We have -already narrated the result of the campaign which had so many -vicissitudes. The combined armies of Israel, Judah, and Edom had been -delivered by the interposition of Elisha from perishing of thirst -beside the scorched-up bed of the Wady-el-Ahsy; and availing -themselves of the rash assault of the Moabites, had swept everything -before them. But Moab stood at bay at Kir-Haraseth (Kerak), his -strongest fortress, six miles from Ar or Rabbah, and ten miles east of -the southern end of the Dead Sea. It stood three thousand feet above -the level of the sea, and is defended by a network of steep valleys. -Nevertheless, Israel would have subdued it, but for the act of -horrible despair to which the King of Moab resorted in his extremity, -by offering up his eldest son as a burnt-offering to Chemosh upon the -wall of the city. Horror-stricken by the catastrophe, and terrified -with the dread that the vengeance of Chemosh could not but be aroused -by so tremendous a sacrifice, the besieging host had retired. From -that moment Moab had not only been free, but assumed the _rôle_ of an -aggressor, and sent her marauding bands to harry and carry the farms -and homesteads of her former conqueror.[152] - -Then followed the aggressions of Benhadad which had been frustrated by -the insight of Elisha, and which owed their temporary cessation to his -generosity.[153] The reappearance of the Syrians in the field had -reduced Samaria to the lowest depths of ghastly famine. But the day of -the guilty city had not yet come, and a sudden panic, caused among the -invaders by a rumoured assault of Hittites and Egyptians, had saved -her from destruction.[154] Taking advantage of the respite caused by -the change of the Syrian dynasty, and pressing on his advantage, -Jehoram, with the aid of his Judæan nephew, had once more got -possession of Ramoth-Gilead before Hazael was secure on the throne -which he had usurped. - -This then was the situation:--The allied and kindred kings of Israel -and Judah were idling in the pomp of hospitality at Jezreel; their -armies were encamped about Ramoth-Gilead; and at the head of the host -of Israel was the crafty and vehement grandson of Nimshi. - -Elisha saw and seized his opportunity. The day of vengeance from the -Lord had dawned. Things had not materially altered since the days of -Ahab. If Jehovah was nominally worshipped, if the very names of the -kings of Israel bore witness to His supremacy,[155] Baal was -worshipped too. The curse which Elijah had pronounced against Ahab and -his house remained unfulfilled. The credit of prophecy was at stake. -The blood of Naboth and his slaughtered sons cried to the Lord from -the ground; and hitherto it seemed to have cried in vain. If the -_Nebiîm_ (the prophetic class) were to have their due weight in -Israel, the hour had come, and the man was ready. - -The light which falls on Elisha is dim and intermittent. His name is -surrounded by a halo of nebulous wonders, of which many are of a -private and personal character. But he was a known enemy of Ahab and -his house. He had, indeed, more than once interposed to snatch them -from ruin, as in the expedition against Moab, and in the awful straits -of the siege of Samaria by the Syrians. But his person had none the -less been hateful to the sons of Jezebel, and his life had been -endangered by their bursts of sudden fury. He could hardly again have -a chance so favourable as that which now offered itself, when the -armed host was at one place and the king at another. Perhaps, too, he -may have been made aware that the soldiers were not well pleased to -find at their head a king who was so far a _fainéant_ as to leave them -exposed to a powerful enemy, and show no eagerness to return. His -"urgent private affairs" were not so urgent as to entitle him to take -his ease at luxurious Jezreel. - -Where Elisha was at the time we do not know--perhaps at Dothan, -perhaps at Samaria. Suddenly he called to him a youth--one of the Sons -of the Prophets, on whose speed and courage he could rely--placed in -his hands a vial of the consecrated anointing oil,[156] told him to -gird up his loins,[157] and to speed across the Jordan to -Ramoth-Gilead. When he arrived, he was to bid Jehu rise up from the -company of his fellow-captains to hurry him into "a chamber within a -chamber,"[158] to shut the door for secrecy, to pour the consecrating -oil upon his head, to anoint him King of Israel in the name of -Jehovah, and then to fly without a moment's delay.[159] - -The messenger--the Rabbis guess that he was Jonah, the son of -Amittai[160]--knew well that his was a service of immense peril, in -which his life might easily pay the forfeit of his temerity. How was -he to guess that at once, without striking a blow, the host of Israel -would fling to the winds its sworn allegiance to the son of the -warrior Ahab, the fourth monarch of the powerful dynasty of Omri? -Might not any one of a thousand possible accidents thwart a conspiracy -of which the success depended on the unflinching courage and -promptitude of his single hand? - -He was but a youth, but he was the trained pupil of a master who had, -again and again, stood before kings, and not been afraid. He sprang -from a community which inherited the splendid traditions of the -Prophet of Flame. - -He did not hesitate a moment. He tightened the camel's hide round his -naked limbs, flung back the long dark locks of the Nazarite, and sped -upon his way. A true son of the schools of Jehovah's prophets has, and -can have, no fear of man. The armies of Israel and Judah saw the wild, -flying figure of a young man, with his hairy garment and streaming -locks, rush through the camp. Whatever might be their surmisings, he -brooked no questions. Availing himself of the awe with which the -shadow of Elijah had covered the sacrosanct person of a prophetic -messenger, he made his way straight to the war-council of the -captains; and brushing aside every attempt to impede his progress with -the plea that he was the bearer of Jehovah's message, he burst into -the council of the astonished warriors, who were assembled in the -private courtyard of a house in the fortress-town.[161] - -He knew the fame of Jehu, but did not know his person, and dared not -waste time. "I have an errand to thee, O captain," he said to the -assembly generally. The message had been addressed to no one in -particular, and Jehu naturally asked, "Unto which of all of us?" With -the same swift intuition which has often enabled men in similar -circumstances to recognise a leader--as Josephus recognised Vespasian, -and St. Severinus recognised Odoacer, and Joan of Arc recognised -Charles VI. of France--he at once replied, "To thee, O captain." Jehu -did not hesitate a moment. Prophets had shown, many a time, that their -messages might not be neglected or despised. He rose, and followed the -youth, who led him into the most secret recess of the house, and -there, emptying on his head the fragrant oil of consecration, said, -"Thus saith Jehovah, God of Israel, I have anointed thee king over -the people of Jehovah, even over Israel."[162] He was to smite the -house of his master Ahab in vengeance for the blood of Jehovah's -prophets and servants whom Jezebel had murdered. Ahab's house, every -male of it, young and old, bond and free,[163] is doomed to perish, as -the houses of Jeroboam and of Baasha had perished before them, by a -bloody end. Further, the dogs should eat Jezebel by the rampart of -Jezreel,[164] and there should be none to bury her. - -One moment sufficed for his daring deed, for his burning message; the -next he had flung open the door and fled. The soldiers of the camp must -have whispered still more anxiously together as they saw the same -agitated youth rushing through their lines with the same impetuosity -which had marked his entrance. In those dark days the sudden appearance -of a prophet was usually the herald of some terrific storm.[165] - -Jehu was utterly taken by surprise; but according to the reading -preserved by Ephraem Syrus in 2 Kings ix. 26, he had on the previous -night seen in a dream the blood of Naboth and his sons. If the thought -of revolt had ever passed for a moment through his mind, it had never -assumed a definite shape. True, he had been a warrior from his youth. -True, he had been one of Ahab's bodyguard, and had ridden before him -in a chariot at least twenty years earlier, and had now risen by -valour and capacity to the high station of captain of the host. True, -also, that he had heard the great curse which Elijah had pronounced on -Ahab at the door of Naboth's vineyard; but he heard it while he was -yet an obscure youth, and he had little dreamed that his was the hand -which should carry it into execution. Who was he? And had not the -house of Omri been, in some sense, sanctioned by Heaven? And were not -the words of the prophet "wild and wandering cries," of which the -issues might be averted by such a repentance as that of Ahab? - -And he felt another misgiving. Might not this scene be the plot of -some secret enemy? Might it not at any rate be a reckless jest palmed -upon him by his comrades? If any jealous member of the confederacy of -captains betrayed the fact that Jehu had tampered with their -allegiance, would his head be safe for a single hour? He would act -warily. He came back to his fellow-captains and said nothing. - -But they were burning with curiosity. Something must be impending. -Prophets did not rush in thus tumultuously for no purpose. Must not -the youth's mantle of hair be some standard of war? - -"Is all right?" they shouted. "Why did this frantic fellow come to -thee?"[166] - -"You know all about it," answered Jehu, with wary coolness. "You know -more about it than I do. You know the man, and what his talk was." - -"Lies!" bluntly answered the rough soldiers.[167] "Tell us now." - -Then Jehu's eye took measure of them and their feelings. A judge of -men and of men's countenances, he saw conspiracy flashing in their -faces. He saw that they suspected the true state of things, and were -on fire to carry it out. Perhaps they had caught sight of the vial of -oil under the youth's scant dress. Could any quickened observation at -least fail to notice that the soldier's dark locks were shining and -fragrant, as they had not been a moment ago, with consecrated oil? - -Then Jehu frankly told them the perilous secret. Thus and thus had the -young prophet spoken, and had said, "Thus saith Jehovah, I have -anointed thee king over Israel." - -The message was met with a shout of answering approbation. That shout -was the death-knell of the house of Omri. It showed that the reigning -dynasty had utterly forfeited its popularity. No luck had followed the -sons of Naboth's murderer. Israel was weary of their mother Jezebel. -Why was this king Jehoram, this king of evil auspices, who had been -repudiated by Moab and harried by Syria--why, in the first gleam of -possible prosperity, was he being detained at Jezreel by wounds which -rumour said were already sufficiently healed to allow him to return to -his post? Down with the seed of the murderer and the sorceress! Let -brave Jehu be king, as Jehovah has said! - -So the captains sprang to their feet, and then and there seized Jehu, -and carried him in triumph to the top of the stairs which ran round -the inside of the courtyard, and stripped off their mantles to -extemporise for him the semblance of a cushioned throne.[168] Then in -the presence of such soldiers as they could trust they blew a sudden -blast of the ram's horn, and shouted, "Jehu is king!" - -Jehu was not the man to let the grass grow under his feet. Nothing -tries a man's vigour and nerve so surely as a sudden crisis. It is -this swift resolution which has raised many a man to the throne, as it -raised Otho, and Napoleon I. and Napoleon III. The history of Israel -is specially full of _coups d'état_, but no one of them is half so -decisive or overwhelming as this. Jehu instantly accepted the office -of Jehovah's avenger on the house of Ahab.[169] Everything, as Jehu -saw, depended on the suddenness and fury with which the blow was -delivered. "If you want me to be your king,"[170] he said, "keep the -lines secure, and guard the fortress walls. I will be my own messenger -to Jehoram. Let no deserter go forth to give him warning."[171] - -It was agreed; and Jehu, only taking with him Bidkar, his -fellow-officer, and a small band of followers, set forth at full speed -from Ramoth-Gilead. - -The fortress of Ramoth, now the important town of Es-Salt, a place -which must always have been the key of Gilead, was built on the -summit of a rocky headland, fortified by nature as well as by art. It -is south of the river Jabbok, and lies at the head of the only easy -road which runs down westward to the Jordan and eastward to the rich -plateau of the interior.[172] Crossing the fords of the Jordan, Jehu -would soon be able to join the main road, which, passing Tirzah, -Zaretan, and Beth-shean, and sweeping eastward of Mount Gilboa, gives -ready access to Jezreel. - -The watchman on the lofty watchtower of the summer palace caught sight -of a storm of dust careering along from the eastward up the valley -towards the city.[173] The times were wild and troublous. What could -it be? He shouted his alarm, "I see a troop!" The tidings were -startling, and the king was instantly informed that chariots and -horsemen were approaching the royal city. "Send a horseman to meet -them," he said, "with the message, 'Is all well?'" - -Forth flew the rider, and cried to the rushing escort, "The king asks, -'Is all well? Is it peace?'" For probably the anxious city hoped that -there might have been some victory of the army against Hazael, which -would fill them with joy. - -"What hast thou to do with peace? Turn thee behind me," answered Jehu; -and perforce the horseman, whatever may have been his conjectures, had -to follow in the rear. - -"He reached them," cried the sentry on the watchtower, "but he does -not return." - -The news was enigmatical and alarming; and the troubled king sent -another horseman. Again the same colloquy occurred, and again the -watchman gave the ominous message, adding to it the yet more -perplexing news that, in the mad and headlong driving[174] of the -charioteer, he recognises the driving of Jehu, the son of Nimshi.[175] - -What had happened to his army? Why should the captain of the host be -driving thus furiously to Jezreel? - -Matters were evidently very critical, whatever the swift approach of -chariots and horsemen might portend. "Yoke my chariot," said Jehoram; -and his nephew Ahaziah, who had shared his campaign, and was no less -consumed with anxiety to learn tidings which could not but be -pressing, rode by him in another chariot to meet Jehu. They took with -them no escort worth mentioning. The rebellion was not only sudden, -but wholly unexpected. - -The two kings met Jehu in a spot of the darkest omen. It was the plot -of ground which had once been the vineyard of Naboth, at the door of -which Ahab had heard from Elijah the awful message of his doom. As the -New Forest was ominous to our early Norman kings as the witness of -their cruelties and encroachments, so was this spot to the house of -Omri, though it was adjacent to their ivory palace, and had been -transformed from a vineyard into a garden or pleasance. - -"Is it peace, Jehu?" shouted the agitated king; by which probably he -only meant to ask, "Is all going well in the army at Ramoth?" - -The fierce answer which burst from the lips of his general fatally -undeceived him. "What peace," brutally answered the rebel, "so long as -the whoredoms of thy mother Jezebel and her witchcrafts are so many?" -She, after all, was the _fons et origo mali_ to the house of Jehoram. -Hers was the dark spirit of murder and idolatry which had walked in that -house. She was the instigator and the executer of the crime against -Naboth. She had been the foundress of Baal- and Asherah-worship; she was -the murderess of the prophets; she had been specially marked out for -vengeance in the doom pronounced both by Elijah and Elisha. - -The answer was unmistakable. This was a revolt, a revolution. -"Treachery, Ahaziah!" shouted the terrified king, and instantly wheeled -round his chariot to flee.[176] But not so swiftly as to escape the -Nemesis which had been stealing upon him with leaden feet, but now smote -him irretrievably with iron hand. Without an instant's hesitation, Jehu -snatched his bow from his attendant charioteer, "filled his hands with -it," and from its full stretch and resonant string sped the arrow, which -smote Jehoram in the back with fatal force, and passed through his -heart.[177] Without a word the unhappy king sank down upon his -knees[178] in his chariot, and fell face forward, dead. - -"Take him up," cried Jehu to Bidkar,[179] "and fling him down where he -is,--here in this portion of the field of Naboth the Jezreelite. Here, -years ago, you and I, as we rode behind Ahab,[180] heard Elijah utter -his oracle on this man's father, that vengeance should meet him here. -Where the dogs licked the blood of Naboth and his sons, let dogs lick -the blood of the son of Ahab."[181] - -But Jehu was not the man to let the king's murder stay his -chariot-wheels when more work had yet to be done. Ahaziah of Judah, -too, belonged to Ahab's house, for he was Ahab's grandson, and -Jehoram's nephew and ally. Without stopping to mourn or avenge the -tragedy of his uncle's murder, Ahaziah fled towards Bethgan or -Engannim,[182] the fountain of gardens, south of Jezreel, on the road -to Samaria and Jerusalem. Jehu gave the laconic order, "Smite him -also";[183] but fright added wings to the speed of the hapless King of -Judah. His chariot-steeds were royal steeds, and were fresh; those of -Jehu were spent with the long, fierce drive from Ramoth. He got as far -as the ascent of Gur before he was overtaken.[184] There, not far from -Ibleam, the rocky hill impeded his flight, and he was wounded by the -pursuers. But he managed to struggle onwards to Megiddo, on the south -of the plain of Jezreel, and there he hid himself.[185] He was -discovered, dragged out, and slain. Even Jehu's fierce emissaries did -not make war on dead bodies, any more than Hannibal did, or Charles V. -They left such meanness to Jehu himself, and to our Charles II. They -did not interfere with the dead king's remains. His servants carried -them to Jerusalem, and there he was buried with his fathers in the -sepulchre of the kings, in the city of David. As there was nothing -more to tell about him, the historian omits the usual formula about -the rest of the acts of Ahaziah, and all that he did. His death -illustrates the proverb _Mitgegangen mitgefangen_: he was the comrade -of evil men, and he perished with them. - -Jehu speedily reached Jezreel, but the interposition of Jehoram and -the orders for the pursuit of Ahaziah had caused a brief delay, and -Jezebel had already been made aware that her doom was imminent. - -Not even the sudden and dreadful death of her son, and the nearness of -her own fate, daunted the steely heart of the Tyrian sorceress. If she -was to die, she would meet death like a queen. As though for some -Court banquet, she painted her eyelashes and eyebrows with antimony, -to make her eyes look large and lustrous,[186] and put on her jewelled -head-dress.[187] Then she mounted the palace tower, and, looking down -through the lattice above the city gate, watched the thundering -advance of Jehu's chariot, and hailed the triumphant usurper with the -bitterest insult she could devise. She knew that Omri, her husband's -father, had taken swift vengeance on the guilt of the usurper Zimri, -who had been forced to burn himself in the harem at Tirzah after one -month's troubled reign. Her shrill voice was heard above the roar of -the chariot-wheels in the ominous taunt,-- - -"Is it peace, thou Zimri, thou murderer of thy master?"[188] - -No!--She meant, "There is no peace for thee nor thine, any more than for -me or mine! Thou mayest murder us; but thee too, thy doom awaiteth!" - -Stung by the ill-omened words, Jehu looked up at her and shouted,-- - -"Who is on my side? Who?" - -The palace was apparently rife with traitors. Ahab had been the first -polygamist among the kings of Israel, and therefore the first also to -introduce the odious atrocity of eunuchs. Those hapless wretches, the -portents of Eastern seraglios, the disgrace of humanity, are almost -always the retributive enemies of the societies of which they are the -helpless victims. Fidelity or gratitude are rarely to be looked for -from natures warped into malignity by the ruthless misdoing of men. -Nor was the nature of Jezebel one to inspire affection. One or two -eunuchs[189] immediately thrust out of the windows their bloated and -beardless faces. "Fling her down!" Jehu shouted. Down they flung the -wretched queen (has any queen ever died a death so shamelessly -ignominious?), and her blood spirted upon the wall, and on the horses. -Jehu, who had only stopped for an instant in his headlong rush, drove -his horses over her corpse,[190] and entered the gate of her capital -with his wheels crimson with her blood. History records scarcely -another instance of such a scene, except when Tullia, a century later, -drove her chariot over the dead body of her father Servius Tullius in -the _Vicus Sceleratus_ of ancient Rome.[191] - -But what cared Jehu? Many a conqueror ere now has sat down to the -dinner prepared for his enemy; and the obsequious household of the -dead tyrants, ready to do the bidding of their new lord, ushered the -hungry man to the banquet provided for the kings whom he had slain. No -man dreamt of uttering a wail; no man thought of raising a finger for -dead Jehoram or for dead Jezebel, though they had all been under _her_ -sway for at least five-and-thirty years. "The wicked perish, and no -man regardeth." "When the wicked perish, there is shouting."[192] - -We may be startled at a revolution so sudden and so complete; yet it -is true to history. A tyrant or a cabal may oppress a nation for long -years. Their word may be thought absolute, their power irresistible. -Tyranny seems to paralyse the courage of resistance, like the fabled -head of Medusa. Remove its fascination of corruption, and men become -men, and not machines, once more. Jehu's daring woke Israel from the -lethargy which had made her tolerate the murders and enchantments of -this Baal-worshipping alien. In the same way in one week Robespierre -seemed to be an invincible autocrat; the next week his power had -crumbled into dust and ashes at a touch. - -It was not until Jehu had sated his thirst and hunger after that wild -drive, which had ended in the murder of two kings and a queen and in -his sudden elevation to a throne, that it even occurred to this new -tiger-king to ask what had become of Jezebel. But when he had eaten -and drunk, he said, "Go, see now to this cursed woman, and bury her: -for she is a king's daughter." That she had been first Princess, then -Queen, then Gebîrah in Israel for nearly a full lifetime was nothing: -it was nothing to Jehu that she was a wife, and mother, and -grandmother of kings and queens both of Israel and Judah;--but she was -also the daughter of Ethbaal, the priest-king of Tyre and Sidon, and -therefore any shameful treatment of her remains might kindle trouble -from the region of Phœnicia.[193] - -But no one had taken the trouble so much as to look after the corpse -of Jezebel. The populace of Jezreel were occupied with their new king. -Where Jezebel fell, there she had been suffered to lie; and no one, -apparently, cared even to despoil her of the royal robes, now -saturated with bloodshed. Flung from the palace-tower, her body had -fallen in the open space just outside the walls--what is called "the -mounds" of an Eastern city. In the strange carelessness of sanitation -which describes as "fate" even the visitation of an avoidable -pestilence, all sorts of offal are shot into this vacant space to -fester in the tropic heat. I myself have seen the pariah dogs and the -vultures feeding on a ghastly dead horse in a ruined space within the -street of Beit-Dejun; and the dogs and the vultures--"those national -undertakers"--had done their work unbidden on the corpse of the Tyrian -queen. When men went to bury her, they only found a few dog-mumbled -bones--the skull, and the feet, and the palms of the hands.[194] They -brought the news to Jehu as he rested after his feast. It did not by -any means discompose him. He at once recognised that another -levin-bolt had fallen from the thunder-crash of Elijah's prophecy, and -he troubled himself about the matter no further. Her carcase, as the -man of God had prophesied, had become as dung upon the face of the -field, so that none could say, "This is Jezebel."[195] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[149] 1 Kings xix. 15, 16. - -[150] 2 Kings viii. 12, 13. - -[151] The name was not uncommon, 1 Chron. ii. 38, iv. 35, xii. 3. - -[152] 2 Kings xiii. 20, xxiv. 2; Jer. xlviii. - -[153] 2 Kings vi. 8-23. - -[154] 2 Kings vii. 6. - -[155] Jehoram = Jehovah is exalted. Ahaziah = Jehovah holds. - -[156] Vial (_pak_) only here and in 1 Sam. x. 1. "_The_ oil" (LXX., -τὸν φακὸν τοῦ ἐλαίου). - -[157] "His habit fit for speed _succinct_" (Milton). - -[158] Inner chamber, 1 Kings xx. 30. - -[159] Perhaps, if Elisha had gone in person, suspicion might have been -aroused. He was not more than fifty at this time, and lived -forty-three years more. - -[160] _Seder Olam_, c. 18. - -[161] It seems as though they were _inside_ the town to defend it, not -a beleaguring host outside. - -[162] The expression is remarkable, as showing how completely the -prerogative of the Chosen People was supposed to rest with the Ten -Tribes, as the most important representatives of the seed of Abraham. - -[163] "Him that is shut up, and him that is left at large in Israel" -(2 Kings ix. 8; 1 Kings xiv. 10, xvi. 3, 4). - -[164] The A.V. has, less accurately, "in the _portion_ of Jezreel." -See 1 Kings xxi. 23. Heb., חֵלֶק. The חֵיל of an Eastern town is the -ditch and empty space--a sort of external _pomœrium_ around it. It is -the place of offal, and the haunt of vultures and pariah dogs. - -[165] 1 Sam. xvi. 4: "Comest thou peaceably?" - -[166] 2 Kings ix. 11, הַמְּשֻׁנָּצ LXX., ὁ ἑπίληπτος. Comp. ver. 20, -"he driveth _furiously_" (בְשִׁנָּצון). - -[167] Ver. 12, a lie! (שֶׁקֶר). - -[168] What is meant by the _gerem_ of the staircase is uncertain. The -word means "a bone" (Aquila, ὀστῶδες), and is, in this connection, an -ἅπαξ λεγόμενον. The Targum explains it as the top vane of a -stair-dial. The margin of the R.V. renders it "on the bare steps." The -Vulgate renders it _in similitudinem tribunalis_, as though _gerem_ -meant _tselem_. The LXX. conceal their perplexity by simply -translating the word ἐπὶ τὸ γαρέμ. Grotius and Clericus, _in fastigio -graduum_. Symmachus, ἐπὶ μίαν τῶν ἀναβαθμίδων. - -[169] 2 Kings ix. 14: "So Jehu _conspired_ against Joram." The same -word is used in 2 Chron. xxiv. 25, 26. - -[170] 2 Kings ix. 15, R.V.: "If this be your mind." - -[171] So far as we know, he never returned to Ramoth-Gilead, of which -indeed we hear no more. - -[172] Tristram, _Land of Moab_. - -[173] Heb., _Shiph'hath_, "a dust-storm" (LXX., κονιορτόν, αἰ. ὄχλον; -Vulg., _globum_), not as in A.V. and R.V., "a company." Comp. Isa. lx. -6; Ezek. xxvi. 10. - -[174] Clearly the rendering "he driveth furiously" is right. The word -"furiously" is _beshigga'ôn_ (Vulg., _præceps_), and is connected with -"mad," ver. 11. LXX., ἐν παραλλαγῇ. Arab. Chald., "quietly." Josephus, -"leisurely, and in good order." Such an approach would not, however, -have been at all in accordance with the perilous urgency of his intent. - -[175] Jehu, the son of Jehoshaphat, is named from his grandfather -Nimshi, who seems to have been the founder of the greatness of his -house. - -[176] 2 Kings ix. 23: "Turned his hands." Comp. 1 Kings xxii. 34. - -[177] Ver. 24. Vulg., _inter scapulas_. - -[178] LXX., reading בּרְכָּיו צַל. - -[179] Bidkar, perhaps Bar-dekar, "Son of stabbing." Comp. 1 Kings iv. 9. - -[180] Heb., _ts'madim_, "in pairs"; LXX., ἐπιβεβηκότες ἐπὶ ζεύγη. It -is uncertain whether Jehu and Bidkar were in the same chariot as Ahab, -as Josephus says (καθεζομένους ὄπισθεν τοῦ ἅρματος), or in a separate -chariot. - -[181] 2 Kings ix. 26: "Saith the Lord." Ephraem Syrus omits these -words. He says that the night before Jehu had seen the blood of Naboth -and his sons in a dream. Comp. Hom., _Od._, iii. 258: Τῷ κε οἱ οὐδὲ -θανόντι χυτὴν ἐπὶ γαῖαν ἔχευαν 'Αλλ' ἄρα τονγε κύνες τε καὶ οἰωνοὶ -κατέδαψαν Κείμενον ἐν πεδίῳ. - -[182] A.V., "By the way of the garden-house." LXX., Βαιθγάν. - -[183] The text is a little uncertain. - -[184] Thenius supposes "Gur" to mean "a caravanserai." Comp. 2 Chron. -xxvi. 7, _Gur-Baal_; Vulg., _Hospitium Baalis_. - -[185] The account of the Chronicler (2 Chron. xxii. 9) differs from -that of the earlier historian. It may, however, be (uncertainly) -reconciled with it as in the text, if we suppose the words "he was hid -in Samaria" to mean in Megiddo, in the territory of Samaria. -Obviously, however, the traditions varied. There are difficulties -about the story, for Ibleam is on the west towards Megiddo, and not -between Jezreel and Samaria. - -[186] פּוּךְ, "Lead-glance." A mixture of pulverised antimony -(_stibium_) and zinc is still used by women in the East for this -purpose. _In calliblepharis dilatat oculos_ (Plin., _H. N._, xxxiii.). -Keren-Happuk, the name given by Job to one of his daughters, means -"horn of stibium." The object could hardly have been to _attract_ Jehu -(as Ephraem Syrus thinks), for Jezebel had already a _grandson_ -twenty-three years old (viii. 26). - -[187] A.V., "_Tired_ her head." Comp. _tiara_. Lit., "made good"; -LXX., ἠγάθυνε. - -[188] Josephus gives the sense very well: Καλὸς δοῦλος ὁ ἀποκτείνας -τὸν δεσπότην (_Antt._, IX. vi. 4). The same question might have been -addressed to Baasha, Shallum, Menahem, Pekah, and Hoshea; but at least -Jehu might plead a prophet's call. - -[189] "Two or three." Lit., "two three," like the old English "two -three" for "several." - -[190] Ver. 33. Heb., "He trod her underfoot." LXX., Συνεπάτησαν αὐτήν; -Vulg., _Conculcaverunt eam_. - -[191] Liv., i. 46-48. - -[192] Prov. xi. 10. Compare the remark of Voltaire, who saw "le peuple -ivré de vin et de joie de la mort de Louis XIV." - -[193] 1 Kings xvi. 31. At this time Ethbaal was dead. He reigned -probably from B.C. 940-908, and died at the age of sixty-eight (Jos., -_Antt._, VIII. xiii. 1, IX. vi. 6; _c. Ap._, i. 18). - -[194] 1 Kings xxi. 23. - -[195] Comp. Psalm lxxxiii. 10. Her name remained a by-word till the -latest days (Rev. ii. 20), and the Spanish Jews called their -persecutress Isabella the Catholic "Jezebel." - - - - - CHAPTER XII - - _JEHU ESTABLISHED ON THE THRONE_ - - B.C. 842-814 - - 2 KINGS x. 1-17 - - "The devil can quote Scripture for his purpose." - SHAKESPEARE. - - -But the work of Jehu was not yet over. He was established at Jezreel; -he was lord of the palace and seraglio of his master; the army of -Israel was with him. But who could be sure that no civil war would -arise, as between the partisans of Zimri and Omri, as between Omri and -Tibni? Ahab, first of the kings of Israel, had left many sons. There -were no less than seventy of these princes at Samaria. Might there not -be among them some youth of greater courage and capacity than the -murdered Jehoram? And could it be anticipated that the late dynasty -was so utterly unfortunate and execrated as to have none left to do -them reverence, or to strike one blow on their behalf, after more than -half a century of undisputed sway?[196] Jehu's _coup de main_ had been -brilliantly successful. In one day he had leapt into the throne. But -Samaria was strong upon its watch-tower hill. It was full of Ahab's -sons, and had not yet declared on Jehu's side. It might be expected -to feel some gratitude to the dynasty which Jehu had supplanted, -seeing that it owed to the grandfather of the king whom he had just -slain its very existence as the capital of Israel. - -He would put a bold face on his usurpation, and strike while the iron -was hot. He would not rouse opposition by seeming to assume that -Samaria would accept his rebellion. He therefore wrote a letter to the -rulers of Samaria[197]--which was but a journey of nine hours' -distance from Jezreel--and to the guardians of the young princes, -reminding them that they were masters in a strong city, protected with -its own contingent of chariots and horses, and well supplied with -armour. He suggested that they should select the most promising of -Ahab's sons, make him king, and begin a civil war on his behalf. - -The event showed how prudent was this line of conduct. As yet Jehu had -not transferred the army from Ramoth-Gilead. He had doubtless taken -good care to prevent intelligence of his plans from reaching the -adherents of Jehoram in Samaria. To them the unknown was the terrible. -All they knew was that "Behold, two kings stood not before him!" The -army must have sanctioned his revolt: what chance had they? As for -loyalty and affection, if ever they had existed towards this hapless -dynasty, they had vanished like a dream. The people of Samaria and -Jezreel had once been obedient as sheep to the iron dominance of -Jezebel. They had tolerated her idol-abominations, and the insolence -of her army of dark-browed priests. They had not risen to defend the -prophets of Jehovah, and had suffered even Elijah, twice over, to be -forced to flee for his life. They had borne, hitherto without a -murmur, the tragedies, the sieges, the famines, the humiliations, with -which during these reigns they had been familiar. And was not Jehovah -against the waning fortunes of the Beni-Omri? Elijah had undoubtedly -cursed them, and now the curse was falling. Jehu must doubtless have -let it be known that he was only carrying out the behest of their own -citizen the great Elisha, who had sent to him the anointing oil. They -could find abundant excuses to justify their defection from the old -house, and they sent to the terrible man a message of almost abject -submission:--Let him do as he would; they would make no king: they -were his servants, and would do his bidding. - -Jehu was not likely to be content with verbal or even written -promises. He determined, with cynical subtlety, to make them put a -very bloody sign-manual to their treaty, by implicating them -irrevocably in his rebellion. He wrote them a second mandate. - -"If," he said, "ye accept my rule, prove it by your obedience. Cut off -the heads of your master's sons, and see that they are brought to me -here to-morrow by yourselves before the evening." - -The ruthless order was fulfilled to the letter by the terrified -traitors. The king's sons were with their tutors, the lords of the city. -On the very morning that Jehu's second missive arrived, every one of -these poor guiltless youths was unceremoniously beheaded. The hideous, -bleeding trophies were packed in fig-baskets and sent to Jezreel.[198] - -When Jehu was informed of this revolting present it was evening, and he -was sitting at a meal with his friends.[199] He did not trouble himself -to rise from his feast or to look at "death made proud by pure and -princely beauty." He knew that those seventy heads could only be the -heads of the royal youths. He issued a cool and brutal order that they -should be piled in two heaps[200] until the morning on either side the -entrance of the city gates. Were they watched? or were the dogs and -vultures and hyænas again left to do their work upon them? We do not -know. In any case it was a scene of brutal barbarism such as might have -been witnessed in living memory in Khiva or Bokhara;[201] nor must we -forget that even in the last century the heads of the brave and the -noble rotted on Westminster Hall and Temple Bar, and over the Gate of -York, and over the Tolbooth at Edinburgh, and on Wexford Bridge. - -The day dawned, and all the people were gathered at the gate, which -was the scene of justice. With the calmest air imaginable the warrior -came out to them, and stood between the mangled heads of those who but -yesterday had been the pampered minions of fortune and luxury. His -speech was short and politic in its brutality. "Be yourselves the -judges," he said. "Ye are righteous. Jezebel called me a Zimri. Yes! I -conspired against my master and slew him: but"--and here he casually -pointed to the horrible, bleeding heaps--"who smote all these?" The -people of Jezreel and the lords of Samaria were not only passive -witnesses of his rebellion; they were active sharers in it. They had -dabbled their hands in the same blood. Now they could not choose but -accept his dynasty: for who was there besides himself? And then, -changing his tone, he does not offer "the tyrant's devilish plea, -necessity," to cloak his atrocities, but--like a Romish inquisitor of -Seville or Granada--claims Divine sanction for his sanguinary -violence. This was not _his_ doing. He was but an instrument in the -hands of fate. Jehovah is alone responsible. He is doing what He spake -by His servant Elijah. Yes! and there was yet more to do; for no word -of Jehovah's shall fall to the ground. - -With the same cynical ruthlessness, and cold indifference to smearing -his robes in the blood of the slain, he carried out to the bitter end -his task of policy which he gilded with the name of Divine justice. -Not content with slaying Ahab's sons, he set himself to extirpate his -race, and slew all who remained to him in Jezreel, not only his kith -and kin, but every lord and every Baal-priest who favoured his house, -until he left him none remaining. - -But what a frightful picture do these scenes furnish us of the state -of religion and even of civilisation in Jezreel! There was this -man-eating tiger of a king wallowing in the blood of princes, and -enacting scenes which remind us of Dahomey and Ashantee, or of some -Tartary khanate where human hands are told out in the market-place -after some avenging raid. And amid all this savagery, squalor, and -Turkish atrocity, the man pleads the sanction of Jehovah, and claims, -unrebuked, that he is only carrying out the behests of Jehovah's -prophets! It is not until long afterwards that the voice of a prophet -is heard repudiating his plea and denouncing his bloodthirstiness. - - "An evil soul producing holy witness - Is like a villain with a smiling cheek-- - A goodly apple rotten at the core." - - -FOOTNOTES: - -[196] Omri, 12 years; Ahab, 22; Ahaziah, 18; Jehoram, 12. - -[197] The reading of 2 Kings x. 1, "Unto the rulers of _Jezreel_," is -clearly wrong. The LXX. reads, "Unto the rulers of Samaria." Unless -"Jezreel" be a clerical error for Israel, we must read, "He sent -letters from Jezreel unto the rulers of Samaria." - -[198] Fig-baskets, Jer. xxiv. 2. The word _dudim_ is rendered "pots" -in 1 Sam. ii. 14. LXX., ἐν καρτάλλοις; Vulg., _in cophinis_. In Psalm -lxxxi. 6 the LXX. has ἐν τῷ κοφίνῳ. - -[199] Jos., _Antt._, IX. vi. 5. - -[200] Heb., _Tsibourîm_; LXX., βουνούς. - -[201] Comp. 1 Sam. xvii. 54; 2 Macc. xv. 30. - -[202] Hos. i. 4. - - - - - CHAPTER XIII - - _FRESH MURDERS--THE EXTIRPATION OF BAAL-WORSHIP_ - (B.C. 842) - - 2 KINGS x. 12-28 - - "Jéhu, sur les hauts lieux, enfin osant offrir - Un téméraire encens que Dieu ne peut souffrir, - N'a pour servir sa cause et venger ses injures - Ni le cœur assez droit, ni les mains assez pures." - RACINE. - - -After such abject subservience had been shown him by the lords of -Samaria and Jezreel, Jehu evidently had no further shadow of -apprehension. He seems to have loved blood for its own sake--to have -been seized by a vertigo of blood-poisoning. Having waded through -slaughter to a throne, he loved to wash his footsteps in the blood of -the slain, and to stretch to the very uttermost--to stretch until it -cracked all its ravelled threads--the Divine sanction claimed by his -fanaticism or his hypocrisy. - -When he had finished his massacres at Jezreel, he went to Samaria. It -was only a journey of a few hours. On the high road he met a company -of travellers, whose escort and rich apparel showed that they were -persons of importance. They were about to halt, perhaps for -refreshment, at the shearing-house of the shepherds--the place in -which the sheep were gathered before they were shorn.[203] - -"Who are ye?" he asked. - -They answered that they were princes of the house of Judah, the brethren -of Ahaziah,[204] on their way to see the two kings at Jezreel, and to -salute their cousins, the children of Jehoram, and their kinsfolk the -children of Jezebel the Gebîrah.[205] The answer sealed their fate. Jehu -ordered his followers to take them alive. At first he had not decided -what he would do with them. But half measures had now become impossible. -This cavalcade of princes little knew that they were on their way to -greet the dead children of a dead king and a dead queen. Jehu felt that -the possibilities of an endless _vendetta_ must be quenched in blood. He -gave orders to slay them, and there in one hour forty-two more scions of -the royal houses of Judah and Israel were done to death.[206] With the -usual reckless insouciance of the East, where any tank or well is made -the natural receptacle for corpses regardless of ultimate consequences, -their bodies were flung into the cistern of the shearing-house, in which -the sheep were washed before shearing, just as the bodies of Gedaliah's -followers were flung by Ishmael into the well at Mizpah, and the bodies -of our own murdered countrymen were flung into the well of Cawnpore. He -did not leave one of them alive. - -Thus Jehu "murdered two kings, and one hundred and twelve princes, and -gave Queen Jezebel to dogs to eat; and if priests had but noticed how -even Hosea condemns and denounces his savagery, they would have -abstained from some of their glorifications of assassins and butchers, -nor would they have appealed to this man's hideous example, as they -have done, to excuse some of their own revolting atrocities."[207] But - - "Crime was ne'er so black - As ghostly cheer and pious thanks to lack. - Satan is modest. At heaven's door he lays - His evil offspring, and in Scriptural phrase - And saintly posture gives to God the praise - And honour of his monstrous progeny."[208] - -One cruel deed more or less was nothing to Jehu. Leaving this tank -choked with death and incarnadined with royal blood, he went on his way -as if nothing particular had happened. He had not proceeded far when he -saw a man well known to him, and of a spirit kindred to his own. It was -the Arab ascetic and Nazarite Jehonadab, the son of Rechab (or "The -Rider"), the chief of the tribe of Kenites who had flung in their lot -with the children of Israel since the days of Moses.[209] It was the -tribe which had produced a Jael; and Jehonadab had something of the -fierce, fanatical spirit of the ancient chieftainess, who, in her own -tent, had dashed out with the tent-peg the brains of Sisera. His very -name, "The Lord is noble," indicated that he was a worshipper of -Jehovah, and his fierce zeal showed him to be a genuine Kenite. -Disgusted with the wickedness of cities, disgusted above all with the -loathly vice of drunkenness, which, as we see from the contemporary -prophets, had begun in this age to acquire fresh prominence in luxurious -and wealthy communities, he exacted of his sons a solemn oath that -neither they nor their successors would drink wine nor strong drink, and -that, shunning the squalor and corruption of cities, they would live in -tents, as their nomad ancestors had done in the days when Jethro and -Hobab were princes of pastoral Midian. We learn from Jeremiah, nearly -two and a half centuries later, how faithfully that oath had been -observed; and how, in spite of all temptation, the vow of abstinence was -maintained, even when the strain of foreign invasion had driven the -Rechabites into Jerusalem from their desolated pastures.[210] - -Jehu knew that the stern fanaticism of the Kenite Emîr would rejoice -in his exterminating zeal, and he recognised that the friendship and -countenance of this "good man and just," as Josephus calls him, would -add strength to his cause, and enable him to carry out his dark -design. He therefore blessed him.[211] - -"Is thine heart right with my heart, as my heart is with thy heart?" -he asked, after he had returned the greeting of Jehonadab. - -"It is, it is!" answered the vehement Rechabite.[212] - -"Then give me thy hand," he said; and grasping the Arab by the -hand,[213] he pulled him up into his chariot--the highest distinction -he could bestow upon him--and bade him come and witness his zeal for -Jehovah. - -His first task on arriving at Samaria was to tear up the last fibres of -Ahab's kith and destroy all his partisans. This was indeed to push to a -self-interested extreme the denunciation which had been pronounced upon -Ahab; but the crime helped to secure his fiercely founded throne. - -One deep-seated plot was yet unaccomplished. It was the total -extermination of Baal-worship. To drive out for ever this orgiastic, -corrupt, and alien idolatry was right; but there is nothing to show -that Jehu would have been unable to effect this purpose by one stern -decree, together with the destruction of Baal's images and temple. A -method so simply righteous did not suit this Nero-Torquemada, who -seemed to be never happy unless he united Jesuitical cunning with the -pouring out of rivers of massacre. - -He summoned the people together; and as though he now threw off all -pretence of zeal for orthodoxy, he proclaimed that Ahab had served -Baal a little, but Jehu would serve him much. The Samaritans must have -been endowed with infinite gullibility if they could suppose that the -king who had ridden into the city side by side with such a man as -Jehonadab--"the warrior in his coat of mail, the ascetic in his shirt -of hair"--who had already exhibited an unfathomable cunning, and had -swept away the Baal-priests of Jezreel, was indeed sincere in this new -conversion.[214] Perhaps they felt it dangerous to question the -sincerity of kings. The Baal-worshippers of former days were known, -and Jehu proclaimed that if any one of them was missing at the great -sacrifice which he intended to offer to Baal he should be put to -death. A solemn assembly to Baal was proclaimed, and every apostate -from God to nature-worship from all Israel was present, till the -idol's temple was thronged from end to end.[215] To add splendour to -the solemnity, Jehu bade the wardrobe-keeper to bring out all the rich -vestments of Tyrian dye and Sidonian broidery, and clothe the -worshippers.[216] Solemnly advancing to the altar with the Rechabite -by his side, he warned the assembly to see that their gathering was -not polluted by the presence of a single known worshipper of Jehovah. -Then, apparently, he still further disarmed suspicion by taking a -personal part in offering the burnt-offering. Meanwhile, he had -surrounded the temple and blocked every exit with eighty armed -warriors, and had threatened that any one of them should be put to -death if he let a single Baal-worshipper escape. When he had finished -the offering,[217] he went forth, and bade his soldiers enter, and -slay, and slay, and slay till none were left. Then flinging the -corpses in a heap, they made their way to the fortress of the Temple, -where some of the priests may have taken refuge. They dragged out and -burnt the _matstseboth_ of Baal,[218] broke down the great central -idol, and utterly dismantled the whole building. To complete the -pollution of the dishallowed shrine, he made it a common midden for -Samaria, which it continued to be for centuries afterwards.[219] It -was his last voluntary massacre. The House of Ahab was no more. -Baal-worship in Israel never survived that exterminating blow. - -Happily for the human race, such atrocities committed in the name of -religion have not been common. In Pagan history we have but few -instances, except the slaughter of the Magians at the beginning of the -reign of Darius, son of Hystaspes. Alas that other parallels should be -furnished by the abominable tyranny of a false Christianity, blessed -and incited by popes and priests! The persecutions and massacres of -the Albigenses, preached by Arnold of Citeaux, and instigated by Pope -Innocent III.; the expulsion of the Jews from Spain; the deadly work -of Torquemada; the murderous furies of Alva among the hapless -Netherlanders, urged and approved by Pope Pius V.; the massacre of -St. Bartholomew, for which Pope Gregory and his cardinals sang their -horrible Te Deum in their desecrated shrines,--these are the parallels -to the deeds of Jehu. He has found his chief imitators among the -votaries of a blood-stained and usurping sacerdotalism, which has -committed so many crimes and inflicted so many horrors on mankind. - -And did God approve all this detestable mixture of zealous enthusiasm -with lying deceit and the insatiate thirst of blood? - -If right be right, and wrong be wrong, the answer must not be an -elaborate subterfuge, but an uncompromising "No!" We need be under no -doubt on that subject. Christ Himself reproved His Apostles for savage -zealotry, and taught them that the Elijah-spirit was not the -Christ-spirit. Nor is the Elisha-spirit the Christian spirit any the -more if these deeds of hypocrisy and blood were in any sense approved -by him who is sometimes regarded as the mild and gentle Elisha. Where -was he? Why was he silent? Could he possibly approve of this -murderer's fury? We do not, indeed, know how far Elisha lent his -sanction to anything more than the general end. Ahab's house had been -doomed to vengeance by the voice which gave utterance to the verdict -of the national conscience. The doom was just; Jehu was ordained to be -the executioner. In no other way could the judgment be carried out. -The times were not sentimental. The murder of Jehoram was not regarded -as an act of tyrannicide, but of divinely commissioned justice. Elisha -_may_ have shrunk from the unreined furies of the man whom he had sent -his emissary to anoint. On the other hand, we have not the least proof -that he did so. He partook, probably, of the wild spirit of the -times, when such deeds were regarded with feelings very different from -the abhorrence with which we, better taught by the spirit of love, and -more enlightened by the widening dawn of history, now justly regard -them. No remonstrance of _contemporary_ prophecy, however faint, is -recorded as having been uttered against the doings of Jehu. The fact -that, several centuries later, they could be recorded by the historian -without a syllable of reprobation shows that the education of nations -in the lessons of righteousness is slow, and that we are still amid -the annals of the deep night of moral imperfection. But the nation was -on the eve of purer teaching, and in the prophets Amos and Hosea we -read the clear condemnation of deeds of cruelty in general, and -specially of the king who felt no pity. Amos condemns even the -idolatrous King of Edom, "because he did pursue his brother with the -sword, and did cast off all pity, and his anger did tear perpetually, -and he kept his wrath for ever."[220] He condemns no less severely the -Chemosh-worshipping King of Moab even for an insult done to the dead: -"Because he burned the bones of the King of Edom into lime."[221] Jehu -had warred pitilessly upon the living, and had shamelessly insulted -the dead. He had flung the heads of seventy princes in two bleeding -heaps on the common road for all eyes to stare upon, and he had -polluted the cistern of Beth-equed-haroim with the dead bodies of -forty-two youths of the royal house of Judah. He might plead that he -was but carrying out to the full the commission of Jehovah, imposed -upon him by Elisha; but Hosea, a century later, gives God's message -against his house: "Yet a little while, and I will avenge the blood -of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu, and will cause to cease the kingdom -of the house of Israel."[222] - -Nay, more! If, as is possible, the ghastly story of the siege of -Samaria, narrated in the memoirs of Elisha, is displaced, and if it -really belongs to the reign of Jehoahaz ben-Jehu, then Elisha himself -brands the cruelty of the rushing thunderbolt of vengeance which his -own hand had launched. For he calls the unnamed "King of Israel" "the -son of a murderer." - -Men who are swords of God, and human executioners of Divine justice, -may easily deceive themselves. God works the ends of His own -providence, and He uses their ministry. "The fierceness of man shall -turn to Thy praise, and the fierceness of them shalt Thou -refrain."[223] But they can never make their plea of prophetic -sanction a cloak of maliciousness. Cromwell had stern work to do. -Rightly or wrongly, he deemed it inevitable, and did not shrink from -it. But he hated it. Over and over again, he tells us, he had prayed -to God that He would not put him to this work. To the best of his -power he avoided, he minimised, every act of vengeance, even when the -sternness of his Puritan sense of righteousness made him look on it as -duty. Far different was the case of Jehu. He loved murder and cunning -for their own sakes, and, like Joab, he dyed the garments of peace -with the blood of war. - -How little was his gain! It had been happier for him if he had never -mounted higher than the captaincy of the host, or even so high. He -reigned for twenty-eight years (842-814)--longer than any king except -his great-grandson Jeroboam II.; and in recognition of any element of -righteousness which had actuated his revolt, his children, even to the -fourth generation, were suffered to sit upon the throne. His dynasty -lasted for one hundred and thirteen years.[224] But his own reign was -only memorable for defeat, trouble, and irreparable disaster. - -For Hazael, who had seized the throne of his murdered lord Benhadad, -was a fierce and able warrior. He held his own against the overweening -might of his northern neighbour Assyria; and whenever he obtained a -respite from this desperate warfare, he indemnified himself for all -losses by enlarging his dominion out of the territories of the Ten -Tribes. "In those days the Lord began to cut Israel short, and Hazael -smote them in all the borders of Israel." Jehu had the mortification -of seeing the fairest and most fruitful regions of his dominion, those -which had belonged to Israel from the most ancient times, wrenched out -of his grasp. From this time forwards Israel lost half the fair -Promised Land which God had given to their fathers. It was the -beginning of the end. Henceforth the tribal inheritance of Reuben, -Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh was an oppressed dependency of -Aram. Hazael overran and annexed the land of Bashan from the spurs of -Mount Hermon to the Lake of Gennezareth; Gaulan, and volcanic Argob, -and Hauran the entire ancient kingdom of Og, King of Bashan, with all -the herds and pasture-lands. Southward of this he seized the whole -forest-clad plateau of Gilead, with its lovely ravines, north of the -Jabbok, the territory of Gad; and pushing still southward, -established his sway over the district, of the Ammonites and the tribe -of Reuben, as far as the city of Aroer, on the other side of the great -chasm of Arnon (Wady Mojib). All the fatness of Bashan and Rabbah with -her watery plain of the Beni-Ammon, and the grass-covered uplands -which fed the enormous flocks of Mesha, the great Emîr and -sheep-master of Moab, passed from Israel to Syria, never to be -recovered. What made the humiliation more terrible was that the -invasion and conquest were accompanied with acts of unwonted cruelty. -Elisha had wept to think what evil Hazael would do the children of -Israel[225]--how he would set their strongholds on fire, and slay -their young men with the sword, and dash in pieces their little ones, -and rip up their women with child. These atrocities were in those -horrible days the ordinary incidents of warfare;[226] but Hazael seems -to have been pre-eminent in brutal fierceness. It was this which -called down on him and his people the "burdens" of Amos. "Thus saith -the Lord; For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four, I will -not turn away the punishment thereof; because they have threshed -Gilead with threshing instruments of iron: but I will send a fire into -the house of Hazael, which shall devour the palaces of Benhadad."[227] - -We can imagine rather than describe the anguish of Jehu when he was -compelled to look impotently on, while his powerful Syrian neighbour -laid waste his dominion with fire and sword, and the cry of his -despoiled and slaughtered subjects was uplifted to him in vain. Nor -was this all. Emboldened by these reverses, a host of other enemies, -once subjugated and despised, began to wreak their revenge and -insolence on humbled Israel. The Philistines eagerly undertook the -sale of the wretched captives who were brought to them in gangs from -the burnt Trans-Jordanic towns.[228] The old "brotherly covenant" with -the Tyrian, which had once been formed by Solomon, and had been -cemented by the marriage of Jezebel with Ahab, was cancelled by Jehu's -insults, and the Tyrians emulously outbad the Philistines in the -purchase of Israelitish slaves. The Edomites and the Ammonites also -helped Hazael in his marauding raids, and enlarged their own domains -at the expense of Samaria. Such insults and humiliations might well go -far to break the heart of an impetuous and warrior-king. - -Of Jehu the Books of Kings and Chronicles have no more to tell us, but -we gain fresh insight into his degradation from the Black Obelisk of -Shalmaneser II. (860-824), now in the British Museum. From the -inscription we find that, in 842, Jehu--"the son of Omri," as he is -erroneously called--was one of the vassal kings who subjected -themselves to the Assyrian conqueror,[229] and sent him tribute, which -may have euphemistically passed under the name of presents. The -despot of Nineveh twice speaks of it as a tribute. On this obelisk we -see a picture of Jehu's ambassadors--perhaps of Jehu himself. On the -left stands the Assyrian King with the winged circle over his head. He -holds a beaker of wine in his hand, and two eunuchs stand behind him, -one of whom covers him with a sunshade. Before him kneels and grovels -in adoration the Jewish King, with his beard sweeping the ground. In -long array behind him come his servants--first two eunuchs, then a -number of bearded figures, who carry the tribute. They are dressed in -long richly fringed robes, exactly resembling those of the Assyrians -themselves, and they wear shoes which turn up at the toes. They are -carrying figures of gold and silver, goblets, golden vessels, ingots -of precious metals, spear-shafts, a kingly sceptre, baskets, bags, and -trays of treasure, the contribution of which must have fallen with -crushing weight on the impoverished kingdom.[230] - -This tribute must have been sent in 842, the eighteenth year of -Shalmaneser II.'s reign. Doubtless Jehu thought he might be delivered -from his furious neighbour Hazael by propitiating the Northern tyrant, -who at the same time received the submission of the Tyrians and -Sidonians. But if so, Jehu's hopes were dashed to the ground. -Shalmaneser was the enemy of Hazael (Ha-sa-ilu), who had gone out to -meet him at Antilibanus, and there had fought a desperate battle. The -Syrian King was routed, and driven back, and Shalmaneser had besieged -Damascus. But he had failed to take it, and indeed had not troubled -Syria again till 832, when he made an excursion of minor importance. -His troubles on the north and east of Assyria had diverted his -attention from Damascus; and this, together with the inferiority of -his son Samsiniras (_d._ 811), had given Hazael a free hand to avenge -himself on Israel as the ally of Assyria. Of Jehu we hear no more. -After his long reign of twenty-eight years he slept with his fathers, -and was buried in Samaria, and Jehoahaz his son reigned in his stead. -Savage as had been his measures, his victory over alien idolatries was -by no means complete. What Micah calls "the statutes of Omri, and the -works of the House of Ahab,"[231] were still kept; and men, both in -Israel and Judah, walked in their old sins. Even in the reign of -Jehu's own son Jehoahaz there still remained in Samaria the Asherah, -or tree consecrated to the nature-goddess, which Jehu seems to have -put away, but not to have destroyed.[232] As he grovelled in the dust -before Shalmaneser, did no memory of his own ferocities darken his -humiliated soul? Must not he, like our Henry II., have been inclined -to utter the wailing cry, "Shame, shame on a conquered king!" - -FOOTNOTES: - -[203] 2 Kings x. 12. The shepherds House of Meeting -(_Beth-equed-haroim_). LXX., ἐν Βαιθακάθ; Vulg., _ad cameram -pastorum_; Aquila, οἶκος κάμψεως. It has been conjectured by -Klostermann that it belonged to the Rechabites, that they had been -persecuted by Jezebel, and that they were glad to help in taking -vengeance on her descendants. - -[204] The Chronicler (2 Chron. xxii. 8) says "_sons_ of the brethren -of Ahaziah." - -[205] LXX., ἡ δυναστεύουσα. - -[206] 2 Kings x. 14, A.V., "at the pit." Lit., "in" or "into the -cistern." - -[207] See Martin, _Hist. de France_, ix. 114. - -[208] Whittier. - -[209] Jer. xxxv. 1-19. Josephus (_Antt._, IX. vi. 6) calls him "a good -man and a just, who had long been a friend of Jehu." "He was," says -Ewald (_Gesch._, iii. 543), "of a society of those who despaired of -being able to observe true religion undisturbedly in the midst of the -nation with the stringency with which they understood it, and -therefore withdrew into the desert." - -[210] Jer. xxxv. (written about B.C. 604). Communities of Nazarites -seem to have sprung up at this epoch, perhaps as a protest against the -prevailing luxury (Amos ii. 11). - -[211] In Josephus it is Jehonadab who blesses the king. - -[212] Heb., וָיֵשׁ יֵש. - -[213] Striking hands was a sign of good faith (Job xvii. 3; Prov. -xxii. 26). - -[214] He did it "in subtilty" (בְצָקְבָה). This substantive occurs -nowhere else, but is connected with the name Jacob. LXX., ἐν πτερνισμῷ, -"in taking by the heel," with reference to the name Jacob, "supplanter." - -[215] Lit., "mouth to mouth." LXX., στόμα εἰς στόμα. - -[216] Ver. 22, מֶלְחָּהַה, _Vestiarum_, occurs here only. The LXX. -omits it or puts it in Greek letters. Targum, κάμπτραι, "chests" Sil. -Italicus (iii. 23) describes the robes of the priests of the -Gaditanian Hercules,-- - - "_Nec discolor ulli, - Ante aras cultus; velantur corpora lino - Et Pelusiaco præfulget stamine vertex._" - KEIL, _ad loc._ - -It was a mixture of "the rich dye of Tyre and the rich web of Nile." - -[217] The phrase may be impersonal, "when one [_i.e._, they] had -finished the sacrifice"; but the narrative seems to imply that Jehu -offered it himself (LXX., ὡς συνετέλεσαν ποιοῦντες τὴν ὁλοκαύτωσιν -Vulg., _cum completum esset holocaustum_). - -[218] A.V., images; R.V., pillars. - -[219] Comp. Ezra vi. 11; Dan. ii. 5. - -[220] Amos i. 11. - -[221] Amos ii. 1. - -[222] Hos. i. 4. - -[223] Psalm lxxvi. 10. - -[224] - - Jehu 842-814. - Jehoahaz 814-797. - Joash 797-781. - Jeroboam II. 781-740. - Zechariah 740. - -[225] 2 Kings viii. 12. - -[226] Isa. xiii. 11-16; Hos. x. 14, xiii. 16; Nah. iii. 10. - -[227] Amos i. 3, 4. - -[228] Amos i. 6-15. - -[229] See Appendix I., Schrader, _Keilinschriften u. das Alte Test._, -208 ff.; Sayce, _Records of the Past_, v. 41; Layard, _Nineveh_, p. -613; Rawlinson, _Herodotus_, i. 469. He is twice mentioned in -inscriptions of Shalmaneser II. (861-825). He is called Ja-hu-a, son -of Omri. The name of Omri was familiar in Nineveh; for Ahab had fought -as a vassal of Assyria at the battle of Karkar, and Samaria was called -Beth-Khumri. Shalmaneser would not trouble himself with the fact that -Jehu had extirpated the old dynasty. His black stêlè was found by -Layard, and is figured in _Monuments of Nineveh_, i., pl. 53. The name -of Jehu was first deciphered by Dr. Hincks in 1851. - -[230] Schrader (E. T.), ii. 199. - -[231] Mic. vi. 16. - -[232] 2 Kings xiii. 6. - - - - - CHAPTER XIV - - _ATHALIAH_ (B.C. 842-836)--_JOASH BEN-AHAZIAH OF - JUDAH_ (B.C. 836-796) - - 2 KINGS xi. 1-xii. 21 - - "Par cette fin terrible, et due à ses forfaits, - Apprenez, Roi des Juifs, et n'oubliez jamais, - Que les rois dans le ciel ont un juge sevère, - L'innocence un vengeur, et les orphelins un père!" - RACINE, _Athalie_. - - "Regardless of the sweeping whirlwind's sway, - That, hushed in grim repose, expects its evening prey." - GRAY. - - -Before we follow the destinies of the House of Jehu we must revert to -Judah, and watch the final consequences of ruin which came in the -train of Ahab's Tyrian marriage, and brought murder and idolatry into -Judah, as well as into Israel. - -Athaliah, who, as queen-mother, was more powerful than the queen-consort -(_malekkah_), was the true daughter of Jezebel. She exhibits the same -undaunted fierceness, the same idolatrous fanaticism, the same swift -resolution, the same cruel and unscrupulous wickedness. - -It might have been supposed that the miserable disease of her husband -Jehoram, followed so speedily by the murder, after one year's reign, -of her son Ahaziah, might have exercised over her character the -softening influence of misfortune. On the contrary, she only saw in -these events a short path to the consummation of her ambition. - -Under Jehoram she had been queen: under Ahaziah she had exercised -still more powerful influence as Gebîrah, and had asserted her sway -alike over her husband and over her son, whose counsellor she was to -do wickedly. It was far from her intention tamely to sink from her -commanding position into the abject nullity of an aged and despised -dowager in a dull provincial seraglio. She even thought that - - "To reign is worth ambition, though in hell; - Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven." - -The royal family of the House of David, numerous and flourishing as it -once was, had recently been decimated by cruel catastrophes. Jehoram, -instigated probably by his heathen wife, had killed his six younger -brothers.[233] Later on, the Arabs and Philistines, in their insulting -invasion, had not only plundered his palace, but had carried away his -sons; so that, according to the Chronicler, "there was never a son -left him, save Jehoahaz [_i.e._, Ahaziah], the youngest of his -sons."[234] He may have had other sons after that invasion; and -Ahaziah had left children, who must all, however, have been very -young, since he was only twenty-two or twenty-three when Jehu's -servants murdered him. Athaliah might naturally have hoped for the -regency; but this did not content her. When she saw that her son -Ahaziah was dead, "she arose and destroyed all the seed royal." In -those days the life of a child was but little thought of; and it -weighed less than nothing with Athaliah that these innocents were her -grandchildren. She killed all of whose existence she was aware, and -boldly seized the crown. No queen had ever reigned alone either in -Israel or in Judah. Judah must have sunk very low, and the talents of -Athaliah must have been commanding, or she could never have -established a precedent hitherto undreamed of, by imposing on the -people of David for six years the yoke of a woman, and that woman a -half-Phœnician idolatress. Yet so it was! Athaliah, like her cousin -Dido, felt herself strong enough to rule. - -But a woman's ruthlessness was outwitted by a woman's cunning. Ahaziah -had a half-sister on the father's side,[235] the princess Jehosheba, -or Jehoshabeath, who was then or afterwards (we are told) married to -Jehoiada, the high priest.[236] The secrets of harems are hidden deep, -and Athaliah may have been purposely kept in ignorance of the birth to -Ahaziah of a little babe whose mother was Zibiah of Beersheba, and who -had received the name of Joash. If she knew of his existence, some -ruse must have been palmed off upon her, and she must have been led to -believe that he too had been killed. But he had not been killed. -Jehosheba "stole him from among the king's sons that were slain," and, -with the connivance of his nurse, hid him from the murderers sent by -Athaliah in the palace store-room in which beds and couches were -kept.[237] Thence, at the first favourable moment, she transferred the -child and nurse to one of the chambers in the three storeys of -chambers which ran round the Temple, and were variously used as -wardrobes or as dwelling-rooms. - -The hiding-place was safe; for under Athaliah the Temple of Jehovah -fell into neglect and disrepute, and its resident ministers would not -be numerous. It would not have been difficult, in the seclusion of -Eastern life, for Jehosheba to pass off the babe as her own child to -all but the handful who knew the secret. - -Six years passed away, and the iron hand of Athaliah still kept the -people in subjection. She had boldly set up in Judah her mother's -Baal-worship. Baal had his temple not far from that of Jehovah; and -though Athaliah did not imitate Jezebel in persecuting the worshippers -of Jehovah, she made her own high priest, Mattan, a much more -important person than Jehoiada for all who desired to propitiate the -favours of the Court. - -Joash had now reached his seventh year, and a Jewish prince in his -seventh year is regarded as something more than a mere child. Jehoiada -thought that it was time to strike a blow in his favour, and to -deliver him from the dreadful confinement which made it impossible for -him to leave the Temple precincts. - -He began secretly to tamper with the guards both of the Temple and of -the palace. Upon the Levitic guards, indignant at the intrusion of -Baal-worship, he might securely count, and the Carites and queen's -runners were not likely to be very much devoted to the rule of the -manlike and idolatrous alien-queen. Taking an oath of them in secrecy, -he bound them to allegiance to the little boy whom he produced from the -Temple chamber as their lawful lord, and the son of their late king. - -The plot was well laid. There were five captains of the five hundred -royal body-guards, and the priest secretly enlisted them all in the -service.[238] The Chronicler says that he also sent round to all the -chief Levites, and collected them in Jerusalem for the emergency. The -arrangements of the Sabbath gave special facility to his plans; for on -that day only one of the five divisions of guards mounted watch at the -palace, and the others were set free for the service of the Temple.[239] -It had evidently been announced that some great ceremony would be held -in the shrine of Jehovah; for all the people, we are told, were -assembled in the courts of the house of the Lord. Jehoiada ordered one -of the companies to guard the palace; another to be at the "gate Sur," -or the gate "of the Foundation";[240] another at the gate behind the -barracks(?) of the palace-runners, to be a barrier[241] against any -incursion from the palace. Two more were to ensure the safety of the -little king by watching the precincts of the Temple. The Levitic -officers were to protect the king's person with serried ranks. Jehoiada -armed them with spears and shields, which David had placed as trophies -in the porch; and if any one tried to force his way within their lines -he was to be slain. The only danger to be apprehended was from any -Carite mercenaries, or palace-servants of the queen: among all others -Jehoiada found a widespread defection. The people, the Levites, even the -soldiers, all hated the Baal-worshipping usurper.[242] - -At the fateful moment the guards were arranged in two dense lines, -beginning from either side of the porch, till their ranks met beyond the -altar, so as to form a hedge round the royal boy. Into this triangular -space the young prince was led by the high priest, and placed beside the -_Matstsebah_--some prominent pillar in the Temple court, either one of -Solomon's pillars Jachin and Boaz, or some special erection of later -days.[243] Round him stood the princes of Judah, and there, in the midst -of them, Jehoiada placed the crown upon his head, and in significant -symbol also laid lightly upon it for a moment "The Testimony"--perhaps -the Ten Commandments and the Book of the Covenant--the most ancient -fragment of the Pentateuch[244]--which was treasured up with the pot of -manna inside or in front of the Ark. Then he poured on the child's head -the consecrated oil, and said, "Let the king live!" - -The completion of the ceremony was marked by the blare of the rams' -horns, the softer blast of the silver trumpets, and the answering shouts -of the soldiers and the people. The tumult, or the news of it, reached -the ears of Athaliah in the neighbouring palace, and, with all the -undaunted courage of her mother, she instantly summoned her escort, and -went into the Temple to see for herself what was taking place.[245] She -probably mounted the ascent which Solomon had made from the palace to -the Temple court, though it had long been robbed of its precious metals -and scented woods. She led the way, and thought to overawe by her -personal ascendency any irregularity which might be going on; for in the -deathful hush to which she had reduced her subjects she does not seem to -have dreamt of rebellion. No sooner had she entered than the guards -closed behind her, excluding and menacing her escort.[246] - -A glance was sufficient to reveal to her the significance of the whole -scene. There, in royal robes, and crowned with the royal crown, stood -her little unknown grandson beside the _Matstsebah_,[247] while round -him were the leaders of the people and the trumpeters, and the -multitudes were still rolling their tumult of acclamation from the court -below. In that sight she read her doom. Rending her clothes, she turned -to fly, shrieking, "Treason! treason!" Then the commands of the priest -rang out: "Keep her between the ranks,[248] till you have got her -outside the area of the Temple; and if any of her guards follow or try -to rescue her, kill him with the sword. But let not the sacred courts be -polluted with her blood." So they made way for her,[249] and as she -could not escape she passed between the rows of Levites and soldiers -till she had reached the private chariot-road by which the kings drove -to the precincts.[250] There the sword of vengeance fell. Athaliah -disappears from history, and with her the dark race of Jezebel. But her -story lives in the music of Handel and the verse of Racine. - -This is the only recorded revolution in the history of Judah. In two -later cases a king of Judah was murdered, but in both instances "the -people of the land" restored the Davidic heir. Life in Judah was less -dramatic and exciting than in Israel, but far more stable;[251] and -this, together with comparative immunity from foreign invasions, -constituted an immense advantage. - -Jehoiada, of course, became regent for the young king, and continued -to be his guide for many years, so that even the king's two wives were -selected by his advice. As the nation had been distracted with -idolatries, he made the covenant between the king and the people that -they should be loyal to each other, and between Jehoiada and the king -and the people that they should be Jehovah's people. Such covenants -were not infrequent in Jewish history. Such a covenant had been made -by Asa[252] after Abijam's apostasy, as it was afterwards made by -Hezekiah[253] and by Josiah.[254] The new covenant, and the sense of -awakenment from the dream of guilty apostasy, evoked an outburst of -spontaneous enthusiasm in the hearts of the populace. Of their own -impulse they rushed to the temple of Baal which Athaliah had reared, -dismantled it, and smashed to pieces his altars and images. The riot -was only stained by a single murder. They slew Mattan, Athaliah's -Baal-priest, before the altars of his god.[255] - -With Jehoiada begins the title of "high priest." Hitherto no higher -name than "the priest" had been given even to Aaron, or Eli, or Zadok; -but thenceforth the title of "chief priest" is given to his -successors, among whom he inaugurated a new epoch.[256] - -It was now Jehoiada's object to restore such splendour and solemnity -as he could to the neglected worship of the Temple, which had suffered -in every way from Baal's encroachments. He did this before the king's -second solemn inauguration. Even the porters had been done away with, -so that the Temple could at any time be polluted by the presence of -the unclean, and the whole service of priests and Levites had fallen -into desuetude. - -Then he took the captains, and the Carians, and the princes, and -conducted the boy-king, amid throngs of his shouting and rejoicing -people, from the Temple to his own palace. There he seated him on the -lion-throne of Solomon his father, in the great hall of justice, and -the city was quiet and the land had rest. According to the historian, -"Joash did right _all his days_, because Jehoiada the priest -instructed him."[257] The stock addition that "howbeit the _bamoth_ -were not removed, and the people still sacrificed and offered incense -there," is no derogation from the merits of Joash, and perhaps not -even of Jehoiada, since if the law against the _bamoth_ then existed, -it had become absolutely unknown, and these local sanctuaries were -held to be conducive to true religion.[258] - -It was natural that the child of the Temple should have at heart the -interests of the Temple in which he had spent his early days, and to -the shelter of which he owed his life and throne. The sacred house had -been insulted and plundered by persons whom the Chronicler calls "the -sons of Athaliah, that wicked woman,"[259] meaning, probably, her -adherents. Not only had its treasures been robbed to enrich the house -of Baal, but it had been suffered to fall into complete disrepair. -Breaches gaped in the outer walls, and the very foundations were -insecure. The necessity for restoring it occurred, not, as we should -have expected, to the priests who lived at its altar, but to the -boy-king. He issued an order to the priests that they should take -charge of all the money presented to the Temple for the hallowed -things, all the money paid in current coin, and all the assessments -for various fines and vows,[260] together with every freewill -contribution. They were to have this revenue entirely at their -disposal, and to make themselves responsible for the necessary -repairs. According to the Chronicler, they were further to raise a -subscription throughout the country from all their personal friends. - -The king's command had been urgent. Money had at first come in, but -nothing was done. Joash had reached the twenty-third year of his -reign, and was thirty years old; but the Temple remained in its old -sordid condition. The matter is passed over by the king as lightly, -courteously, and considerately as he could; but if he does not charge -the priests with downright embezzlement, he does reproach them for -most reprehensible neglect. They were the appointed guardians of the -house: why did they suffer its dilapidations to remain untouched year -after year, while they continued to receive the golden stream which -poured--but now, owing to the disgust of the people, in diminished -volume--into their coffers? "Take no more money, therefore," he said, -"from your acquaintances, but deliver it for the breaches of the -house." For what they had already received he does not call them to -account, but henceforth takes the whole matter into his own hands. The -neglectful priests were to receive no more contributions, and not to -be responsible for the repairs. Joash, however, ordered Jehoiada to -take a chest and put it beside the altar on the right.[261] All -contributions were to be dropped into this chest. When it was full, it -was carried by the Levites unopened into the palace,[262] and there -the king's chancellor and the high priest had the ingots weighed and -the money counted; its value was added up, and it was handed over -immediately to the architects, who paid it to the carpenters and -masons. The priests were left in possession of the money for the -guilt-offerings[263] and for the sin-offerings, but with the rest of -the funds they had nothing to do. In this way was restored the -confidence which the management of the hierarchy had evidently -forfeited, and with renewed confidence in the administration fresh -gifts poured in. Even in the cautious narrative of the Chronicler it -is clear that the priests hardly came out of these transactions with -flying colours. If their honesty is not formally impugned, at least -their torpor is obvious, as is the fact that they had wholly failed to -inspire the zeal of the people till the young king took the affair -into his own hands.[264] - -The long reign of Joash ended in eclipse and murder. If the later -tradition be correct, it was also darkened with atrocious ingratitude -and crime. - -For, according to the Chronicler, Jehoiada died at the advanced age of -one hundred and thirty, and was buried, as an unwonted honour, in the -sepulchres of the kings.[265] When he was dead, the princes of Judah -came to Joash, who had now been king for many years, and with a -strange suddenness tempted the zealous repairer of the Temple of -Jehovah into idolatrous apostasy. With soft speech they seduced him -into the worship of Asherim. It was marvellous indeed if the child of -the Temple became its foe, and he who had made a covenant with Jehovah -fell away to Baalim. But worse followed. Prophets reproved him, and he -paid them no heed, in spite of "the greatness of the burdens"--_i.e._, -the multitude of the menaces--laid upon him.[266] The stern, -denunciative harangues were despised. At last Zechariah, the son of -his benefactor Jehoiada, rebuked king and people. He cried aloud from -some eminence in the court of the Temple, that "since they had -transgressed the commandments of Jehovah they could not prosper: they -had forsaken Him, and He would forsake them." Infuriated by this -prophecy of woe, the guilty people, at the command of their guiltier -king, stoned him to death.[267] As he lay dying, he exclaimed, "The -Lord look upon it, and require it!"[268] - -The entire silence of the elder and better authority might lead us to -hope that there may be room for doubt as to the accuracy of the much -later tradition. Yet there certainly was a persistent belief that -Zechariah had been thus martyred. A wild legend, related in the -Talmud,[269] tells us that when Nebuzaradan conquered Jerusalem and -entered the Temple he saw blood bubbling up from the floor of the -court, and slaughtered ninety-four myriads, so that the blood flowed -till it touched the blood of Zechariah, that it might be fulfilled -which is said (Hos. iv. 2), "Blood toucheth blood." When he saw the -blood of Zechariah, and noticed that it was boiling and agitated, he -asked, "What is this?" and was told that it was the spilled blood of -the sacrifices. Finding this to be false, he threatened to comb the -flesh of the priests with iron curry-combs if they did not tell the -truth. Then they confessed that it was the blood of the murdered -Zechariah. "Well," he said, "I will pacify him." First he slaughtered -the greater and lesser Sanhedrin: but the blood did not rest. Then he -sacrificed young men and maidens: but the blood still bubbled. At -last he cried, "Zechariah, Zechariah, must I then slay them all?" Then -the blood was still, and Nebuzaradan, thinking how much blood he had -shed, fled, repented, and became a Jewish proselyte! - -Perhaps the worst feature of the story against Joash might have been -susceptible of a less shocking colouring. He had naturally all his life -been under the influence of priestly domination. The ascendency which -Jehoiada had acquired as priest-regent had been maintained till long -after the young king had arrived at full manhood. At last, however, he -had come into collision with the priestly body. He was in the right; -they were transparently in the wrong. The Chronicler, and even the older -historian, soften the story against the priests as much as they can; but -in both their narratives it is plain that Jehoiada and the whole -hierarchy had been more careful of their own interests than of those of -the Temple, of which they were the appointed guardians. Even if they can -be acquitted of potential malfeasance, they had been guilty of -reprehensible carelessness. It is clear that in this matter they did not -command the confidence of the people; for so long as they had the -management of affairs the sources of munificence were either dried up or -only flowed in scanty streams, whereas they were poured forth with glad -abundance when the administration of the funds was placed mainly in the -hands of laymen under the king's chancellor. It is probable that when -Jehoiada was dead Joash thought it right to assert his royal authority -in greater independence of the priestly party; and that party was headed -by Zechariah, the son of Jehoiada. The Chronicler says that he -prophesied: that, however, would not necessarily constitute him a -prophet, any more than it constituted Caiaphas. If he was a prophet, and -was yet at the head of the priests, he furnishes an all-but solitary -instance of such a position. The position of a prophet, occupied in the -great work of moral reformation, was so essentially antithetic to that -of priests, absorbed in ritual ceremonies, that there is no body of men -in Scripture of whom, as a whole, we have a more pitiful record than of -the Jewish priests. From Aaron, who made the golden calf, to Urijah, who -sanctioned the idolatrous altar of Ahaz, and so down to Annas and -Caiaphas, who crucified the Lord of glory, they rendered few signal -services to true religion. They opposed Uzziah when he invaded their -functions, but they acquiesced in all the idolatries and abominations of -Rehoboam, Abijah, Ahaziah, Ahaz, and many other kings, without a -syllable of recorded protest. When a prophet did spring from their -ranks, they set their faces with one consent, and were confederate -against him. They mocked and ridiculed Isaiah. When Jeremiah rose among -them, the priest Pashur smote him on the cheek, and the whole body -persecuted him to death, leaving him to be protected only by the pity of -eunuchs and courtiers. Ezekiel was the priestliest of the prophets, and -yet he was forced to denounce the apostasies which they permitted in the -very Temple. The pages of the prophets ring with denunciations of their -priestly contemporaries.[270] - -We do not know enough of Zechariah to say much about his character; -but priests in every age have shown themselves the most unscrupulous -and the most implacable of enemies. Joash probably stood to him in -the same relation that Henry II. stood to Thomas à Becket. The -priest's murder may have been due to an outburst of passion on the -part of the king's friends, or of the king himself--gentle as his -character seems to have been--without being the act of black -ingratitude which late traditions represented it to be. The legend -about Zechariah's blood represents the priest's spirit as so -ruthlessly unforgiving as to awaken the astonishment and even the -rebukes of the Babylonian idolater. Such a legend could hardly have -arisen in the case of a man who was other than a most formidable -opponent. The murder of Joash may have been, in its turn, a final -outcome of the revenge of the priestly party. The details of the story -must be left to inference and conjecture, especially as they are not -even mentioned in the earlier and more impartial annalists. - -It is at least singular that while Joash, the king, is blamed for -continuing the worship at the _bamoth_, Jehoiada, the high priest, is -_not_ blamed, though they continued throughout his long and powerful -regency. Further, we have an instance of the priest-regent's autocracy -which can hardly be regarded as redounding to his credit. It is -preserved in an accidental allusion on the page of Jeremiah. In Jer. -xxix. 26 we read his reproof and doom of the lying prophecy of the -priest Shemaiah the Nehelamite, because as a priest he had sent a -letter to the chief priest Zephaniah and all the priests, urging them -as the successors of Jehoiada to follow the ruling of Jehoiada, which -was to put Jeremiah in a collar. For Jehoiada, he said, "had ordered -the priests, as officers [_pakidim_] in the house of Jehovah, to put -in the stocks every one that is mad and maketh himself a -prophet."[271] If, then, the Jehoiada referred to is the -priest-regent, as seems undoubtedly to be the case, we see that he -hated all interference of Jehovah's prophets with his rule. That the -prophets were usually regarded by the world and by priests as "mad," -we see from the fact that the title is given by Jehu's captains to -Elisha's emissary;[272] and that this continued to be the case we see -from the fact that the priests and Pharisees of Jerusalem said of John -the Baptist that he had a devil, and of Christ that He was a -Samaritan, and that He, too, had a devil. If Joash was in opposition -to the priestly party, he was in the same position as all God's -greatest saints and reformers have ever been from the days of Moses to -the days of John Wesley. The dominance of priestcraft is the -invariable and inevitable death of true, as apart from functional, -religion. Priests are always apt to concentrate their attention upon -their temples, altars, religious practices and rites--in a word, upon -the externals of religion. If they gain a complete ascendency over -their fellow-believers, the faithful become their absolute slaves, -religion degenerates into formalism, "and the life of the soul is -choked by the observance of the ceremonial law." It was a misfortune -for the Chosen People that, except among the prophets and the wise -men, the external worship was thought much more of than the moral law. -"To the ordinary man," says Wellhausen, "it was not moral but -liturgical acts which seemed to be religious." This accounts for the -monotonous iteration of judgments on the character of kings, based -primarily, not upon their essential character, but on their relation -to the _bamoth_ and the calves. - -Although the historian of the Kings gives no hint of this dark story of -Zechariah's murder, or of the apostasy of Joash, and indeed narrates no -other event of the long reign of forty years, he tells us of the -deplorable close. Hazael's ambition had been fatal to Israel; and now, -in the cessation of Assyrian inroads upon Aram, he extended his arms -towards Judah. He went up against Gath and took it, and cherished -designs against Jerusalem. Apparently he did not head the expedition in -person, and the historian implies that Joash bought off the attack of -his "general." But the Chronicler makes things far worse. He says that -the Syrian host marched to Jerusalem, destroyed all the princes of the -people, plundered the city, and sent the spoil to Hazael, who was at -Damascus. Judah, he says, had assembled a vast army to resist the small -force of the Syrian raid; but Joash was ignominiously defeated, and was -driven to pay blackmail to the invader. As to this defeat in battle the -historian is silent; but he mentions what the Chronicler omits--namely, -that the only way in which Joash could raise the requisite bribe was by -once more stripping the Temple and the palace, and sending to Damascus -all the treasures which his three predecessors had consecrated,--though -we are surprised to learn that after so many strippings and plunderings -any of them could still be left. - -The anguish and mortification of mind caused by these disasters, and -perhaps the wounds he had received in the defeat of his army, threw -Joash into "great diseases." But he was not suffered to die of -these.[273] His servants--perhaps, if that story be authentic, to -avenge the slain son of Jehoiada, but doubtless also in disgust at -the national humiliation--rose in conspiracy against him, and smote -him at Beth-Millo,[274] where he was lying sick. The Septuagint, in 2 -Chron. xxiv. 27, adds the dark fact that _all his sons_ joined in the -conspiracy.[275] This cannot be true of Amaziah, who put the murderer -to death. Such, however, was the deplorable end of the king who had -stood by the Temple pillar in his fair childhood, amid the shouts and -trumpet-blasts of a rejoicing people. At that time all things seemed -full of promise and of hope. Who could have anticipated that the boy -whose head had been touched with the sacred oil and over-shadowed with -the Testimony--the young king who had made a covenant with Jehovah, -and had initiated the task of restoring the ruined Temple to its -pristine beauty--would end his reign in earthquake and eclipse? If -indeed he had been guilty of the black ingratitude and murderous -apostasy which tradition laid to his charge, we see in his end the -Nemesis of his ill-doing; yet we cannot but pity one who, after so -long a reign, perished amid the spoliation of his people, and was not -even allowed to end his days by the sore sickness into which he had -fallen, but was hurried into the next world by the assassin's knife. - -It is impossible not to hope that his deeds were less black than the -Chronicler painted. He had made the priests feel his power and -resentment, and their Levitic recorder was not likely to take a -lenient view of his offences. He says that though Joash was buried in -the City of David, he was not buried in the sepulchres of his fathers. -The historian of the Kings, however, expressly says that "they buried -him with his fathers in the City of David," and he was peaceably -succeeded by Amaziah his son. - -There is a curious, though it may be an accidental, circumstance about -the name of the two conspirators who slew him. They are called -"Jozacar, the son of Shimeath, and Jehozabad, the son of Shomer, his -servants." The names mean "Jehovah remembers," the son of "Hearer," -and "Jehovah awards," the son of "Watcher"; and this strangely recalls -the last words attributed in the Book of Chronicles to the martyred -Zechariah. "Jehovah look upon it, and require it!" The Chronicler -turns the names into "Zabad, the son of Shimeath, an Ammonitess, and -Jehozabad, the son of Shimrith, a Moabitess." Does he record this to -account for their murderous deed by the blood of hated nations which -ran in their veins? - -FOOTNOTES: - -[233] 2 Chron. xxi. 2-4. - -[234] 2 Chron. xxi. 17. - -[235] ὁμοπάτριος ἀδελφή (Jos.). - -[236] 2 Chron. xxii. 11. There are undoubted difficulties about the -statement (see _infra_). There is no other instance of the marriage of -a princess with a priest. - -[237] Jos., _Antt._, IX. vii. 1: τὸ ταμιεῖον τῶν κλινῶν. The chamber -of beds was a sort of unoccupied wardrobe-room. - -[238] 2 Kings xi. 4: "The centurions of the Carians and of the runners." - -[239] This is the second time that the word "Sabbath" occurs, or that -the institution is alluded to, in the history of either monarchy. - -[240] Nothing is known of סוּר, Sur, or יְסוֹד _y'sôd_, the Foundation -(2 Chron. xxiii. 5). They are not mentioned elsewhere. LXX., εν τῇ -πύλῃ τῶν ὁδῶν, and (in Chronicles) ἐν τῇ πύλῃ τῇ μέσῃ. - -[241] Not as in A.V., "that it be not broken down." - -[242] In reading side by side the narratives in the Books of Kings and -Chronicles (2 Chron. xxiii.), it is difficult to avoid the conclusion -that the main anxiety of the Chronicler is to leave the impression -that the work in the Temple was chiefly done by the Levites, and that -the sacred precincts were not polluted by the presence of alien -troops. He evidently stumbled at the notion, conveyed by the older -narrative, that Carians and suchlike semi-heathen mercenaries should -have stood by the altar at a high priest's command; so he substitutes -Levites for guardsmen, and the profane laymen are relegated outside. -In details the two accounts are only reconcilable by a special -pleading which would reconcile _any_ discrepancy. - -[243] 1 Kings vii. 21. Comp., however, 2 Kings xxiii. 3. - -[244] See Exod. xxv. 16, 21, xvi. 34. הָצֵדוּת (see 2 Chron. xxiii. -11). Kimchi takes it to mean "a royal robe," and other Rabbis a -phylactery on the coronet (Deut. vi. 8). In the Targum to Chronicles -it is explained to mean the costly jewel (2 Sam. xii. 30), of which -none but a descendant of David could bear the weight. For _ha'edôth_ -Klostermann therefore suggests _hats'adôth_, "the royal bracelets." - -[245] So says Josephus (μετὰ τῆς ἰδίας στρατίας), and it is certain -that she would hardly go unattended. - -[246] Jos., _Antt._, IX. vii. 3: Τὸυς δὲ ἑπομένους ὁπλίτας εἶρξαν -εἰσελθεῖν. - -[247] The meaning of _al-ha'amôd_ is uncertain (A.V., "by a pillar"; -Vulg., "on the tribunal"). Comp. 2 Kings xxiii. 3; 2 Chron. xxiii. 13; -1 Kings viii. 22; 2 Chron. vi. 13. - -[248] 2 Kings xi. 15. Not as in A.V., "without the ranges." Heb., -_lash'dêrôth_; LXX., ἔσωθεν τῶν σαδηρώθ. - -[249] A.V., "And they laid hands on her"; LXX., ἐπέβαλον αὐτῃ χεῖρας; -Vulg., _imposuerunt ci manus_. But R.V. as in the text, following the -Targum, and the Jewish commentators, "They made for her two sides." - -[250] This is usually understood to be the "horse gate" of the city -(Neh. iii. 28), and so Josephus seems to have taken it, for he says -that Athaliah was killed in "the Kedron Valley." Canon Rawlinson says -that it was more probably in the Tyropœon Valley. But there could have -been no object in dragging the wretched queen all this way. Jehoiada -was only anxious that she should not stain the Temple with her blood, -and "the way by which the horses came into the king's house" seems to -be some private palace-gate. We are expressly told (ver. 16) that -Athaliah was slain "at the king's house," probably in "the king's -garden" (2 Kings xxv. 4). - -[251] Wellhausen, _Isr. and Jud._, p. 96. - -[252] 2 Chron. xv. 9-15. - -[253] 2 Chron. xxix. 10. - -[254] 2 Chron. xxxiv. 31. - -[255] The name is perhaps an abbreviation from Mattan-Baal, "gift of -Baal." Comp. "Methumballes" (Plaut.). The names of Tyrian kings, -Mitinna, Mattun, occur in inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser II. See -Herod., vii. 98 (Bahr, _ad loc._). "Methumbaal of Arvad" is mentioned -on a monument of Tiglath-Pileser II. (Schrader, ii. 249). - -[256] 2 Kings xii. 10; Jer. xxix. 26; 2 Chron. xxiv. 6. Stanley, -_Lectures_, ii. 399. - -[257] 2 Kings xii. 2. After "all his days," the R.V. and A.V. add -"_wherein_ Jehoiada instructed him." This, however, is not accurate. -There is a stop at days, and "wherein" should be "_because_." There -seems, however, from the LXX., to be some variation in the text, and -according to the Chronicler Joash became an apostate. LXX., Πάσας τὰς -ἡμέρας ἅς ἐφώτιζεν αὐτὸν ὁ ἱερεύς; Vulg., _Cunctis diebus quibus -docuit eum Jojadas sacerdos_. - -[258] The Chronicler (2 Chron. xxiv. 1, 2) _more suo_ copies 2 Kings -xii. 1, 2, but omits 3, because he dislikes the fact that not even his -hero Jehoiada had anything to say against the _bamoth_. But it appears -from 2 Kings xxiii. 9 that the _bamoth_ had regular priests of their -own, who "eat the priestly portions" (according to an old MS.) among -their brethren. - -[259] 2 Chron. xxiv. 7. - -[260] 2 Kings xii. 4: "The money that every man is set at." Lit., -"Each the money of the souls of his valuation." Comp. Numb. xviii. 16; -Lev. xxvii. 2. - -[261] The Chronicler says "at the gate." - -[262] 2 Chron. xxiv. 11. - -[263] Lev. v. 1-6, xiv. 13. "Trespass-money" is here first mentioned. - -[264] 2 Chron. xxiv. 8-10. There is a difference between the historian -and the Chronicler respecting the vessels of the house. - -[265] 2 Chron. xxiv. 15, 16. The statement of the Chronicler is (as so -often) surrounded by difficulties and improbabilities. If Jehoiada was -one hundred and thirty years old when he died, he must have been -ninety when Ahaziah was murdered, at the age of twenty-three. But as -Ahaziah was (apparently) born when his father Jehoram was eighteen, -Jehosheba must have been under eighteen, and must have been married to -a man seventy years older than herself! See Lord Arthur Hervey, _On -the Genealogies_, p. 113. - -[266] 2 Chron. xxiv. 27. - -[267] Stanley charitably thinks that Joash may have only burst into -hasty words like those of Henry II. against Becket. - -[268] The Chronicler says that "the _sons_ of Jehoiada" had helped to -crown him, and that he put "the _sons_ of Jehoiada" to death (2 Chron. -xxiii. 11, xxiv. 25). - -[269] Gittin, f. 57, 2; Sanhedrin, f. 96, 2; Hershon, _Treasures of -the Talmud_, p. 276; Lightfoot on Matt. xxiii. 35. There can be little -doubt that the reading "Berechiah" is a later correction of some one -who remembered the murder narrated in Jos., _B. J._, IV. v. 4, and -that the true reading is "son of Jehoiada." This is the last murder of -a prophet mentioned in the Old Testament, and we learn from the Gospel -the fact that he was slain "between the Temple and the altar." - -[270] Isa. xxiv. 2; Jer. v. 31, xxiii. 11; Ezek. vii. 26, xxii. 26; -Hos. iv. 9; Mic. iii. 11, etc. - -[271] Jer. xxix. 24-32. - -[272] 2 Kings ix. 11. - -[273] But from the Book of Kings we should not infer that there had -been any fighting at all. The Syrian commander had been bribed to -retire. - -[274] We cannot understand the addition "on the way that goeth down to -Silla." Silla is nowhere else referred to. - -[275] LXX., 2 Chron. xxiv. 27, καὶ οἱ υἱοὶ αὐτοῦ πάντες. - - - - - CHAPTER XV - - _AMAZIAH OF JUDAH_ - - B.C. 796-783 (?) - - 2 KINGS xiv. 1-22 - - "All they that take the sword shall perish with the sword."--MATT. - xxvi. 52. - - -The fate of Amaziah ("Jehovah is strong"), son of Joash of Judah, -resembles in some respects that of his father. Both began to reign -prosperously: the happiness of both ended in disaster. Amaziah at his -accession was twenty-five years old. He was the son of a lady of -Jerusalem named Jehoaddin. He reigned twenty-nine years, of which the -later ones were passed in misery, peril, and degradation, and, like -the unhappy Joash, and at about the same age, he fell the victim of -domestic conspiracy. - -The hereditary principle was too strongly established to enable the -murderers of Joash to set it aside, but Amaziah was not at first -strong enough to make any head against them. In time he became -established in his kingdom, and then his earliest act was to bring the -head conspirators, Jozacar and Jehozabad, to justice. It was noted as -a most remarkable circumstance that he did not put to death their -children, and extirpate their houses. In acting thus, if he were -influenced by a spirit of mercy, he showed himself before his time; -but such mercy was completely contrary to the universal custom, and -was also regarded as most impolitic. Even the comparatively merciful -Greeks had the proverb, "Fool, who has murdered the sire, and left his -sons to avenge him!"[276] - -In epochs of the wild justice of revenge, when blood-feuds are an -established and approved institution, the policy of letting vengeance -only fall on the actual offender was regarded as fatal. Perhaps Amaziah -felt it beyond his power to do more than bring the actual murderers to -justice, and it is possible that their children may have been among the -conspirators who, in his hour of shame, intimately destroyed him. - -The historian, it is true, attributes his conduct to magnanimity, or -rather to his obedience to the law, "The fathers shall not be put to -death for the children, nor the children for the fathers; but every -man shall die for his own sin." This is a reference to Deut. xxiv. 16, -and is probably the independent comment of the writer who recorded the -event two centuries later. In the gradual growth of a milder -civilisation, and the more common dominance of legal justice, such a -law may have come into force, as expressive of that voice of -conscience which is to sincere nations the voice of God. That the book -of Deuteronomy, as a book, was not in existence in its present form -till four reigns later we shall hereafter see strong reasons to -believe. But even if any part of that book was in existence, it is not -easy to understand how Amaziah would have been able to decide that the -law which forbade the punishment of the children with the offending -parents was the law which he was bound to follow, when Moses and -Joshua and other heroes of his race had acted on the olden principle. -The innocent families of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram were represented as -having been swallowed up with the ambitious heads of their houses. -Joshua and all Israel had not only stoned Achan, but with him all his -unoffending house. What, too, was the meaning of the law which -established the five Cities of Refuge as the best way to protect the -accidental homicide from the recognised and unrebuked actions of the -Goel--the avenger of blood? The vengeance of a Goel was regarded, as -it is in the East and South to this day, not as an implacable -fierceness, but as a sacred duty, the neglect of which would cover him -with infamy. Judging of our documents by the impartial light of honest -criticism, it seems impossible to deny that the law of Deuteronomy was -the law of an advancing civilisation, which became more mild as -justice became firmer and more available. If Deuteronomy represents -the legislation of Moses, we can only say that in this respect Amaziah -was the first person who paid the slightest attention to it. Such -exceptional obedience may well excite the notice of the historian, in -whose pages we see that prophets like Ahijah, Elijah, and Elisha had, -again and again, in accordance with the spirit of their times, -contemplated the total excision, not only of erring kings, but even of -their little children and their most distant kinsfolk. - -Further:--We are told that Amaziah "did that which was right in the -sight of Jehovah: he did according to all things _as Joash his father -did_." The Chronicler also bestows his eulogy on Amaziah; but having -told such dark stories of the apostasy of Joash to Asherah-worship -and his murder of the prophets, he could hardly add "as Joash his -father did"; so he omits those words. The reservation that Amaziah did -right, "yet not like David his father" (2 Kings xiv. 3), "but not with -a perfect heart" (2 Chron. xxv. 2), is followed by the stock abatement -about the _bamoth_, and the sacrifices and incense burnt in them. This -was a crime in the eyes of writers in B.C. 540, but certainly not in -the eyes of any king before the discovery of the "Book of the Law" in -the reign of Josiah, B.C. 621. We are compelled, therefore, by simple -truth, to ask, How came it that Amaziah should be so scrupulous as to -observe the Deuteronomic law by not slaying the sons of his father's -murderers, while he does not seem to be aware, any more than the best -of his predecessors, that while he obeyed one precept he was violating -the essence and spirit of the entire code in which the precept occurs? -The one main object, the constantly repeated law of Deuteronomy, is -the centralisation of all worship, and the rigid prohibition of every -local place of sacrifice. Strange that Amaziah should have selected -for attention a single precept, while he is profoundly unconscious of, -or indifferent to, the fact that he is setting aside the regulation -with which the law, as Deuteronomy represents it, begins and ends, and -on which it incessantly insists! - -Joash had been something of a weakling, as though the gloom of his -early concealment in the Temple and the shadow of priestly dominance -had paralysed his independence. Amaziah, on the other hand, born in -the purple, was vigorous and restless. When he was secure upon the -throne, and had done his duty to his father's memory, he bent his -efforts to recover Edom. The Edomites had revolted in the days of his -great-grandfather Jehoram,[277] and since then "did tear -perpetually,"[278] harassing with incessant raids the miserable -fellahîn of Southern Judah. They reaped the crops of the settled -inhabitants, cut down their fruit-trees, burnt their farmsteads, and -carried their children into cruel and hopeless slavery. One verse -tells us all that the historian knew, or cared to relate, of Amaziah's -campaign. He only says that it was eminently successful. Amaziah -confronted the Edomites in the Valley of Salt,[279] on the border of -Edom, to the south of the Dead Sea, and inflicted upon them a signal -defeat. He not only slaughtered ten thousand of them, but, advancing -southwards, he stormed and captured Selah or Petra, their rocky -capital, two days' journey north of Ezion-Geber, on the gulf of -Akabah.[280] Considering the natural strength of Petra, amid its -mountain-fastnesses, this was a victory of which he might well be -proud, and he marked his prowess by changing the name of the city to -Joktheel, "subdued by God." The historian, copying the ancient record -before him, says that Selah continued to be so called "to this -day."[281] This is a curious instance of close transcription, for it -is certain that Selah can only have retained the name of Joktheel for -a very short period, and had lost it long before the days of the -Exile. Even in the reign of Ahaz (B.C. 735-715) the Edomites had so -completely recovered lost ground that they were able to make -predatory excursions into Judah, and to threaten Hebron, which would -have been obviously impossible if they were not masters of their own -chief capital.[282] The district which Amaziah seems to have conquered -was mainly west of the Arabah. He wished to restore Elath, and perhaps -to carry out the old commerce with the Red Sea which Solomon began, -and which had fired the ambition of Jehoshaphat. The conquest of Selah -secured the road for his commercial caravans. - -So far the older and better authorities. The Chronicler expands the -story in his usual fashion, in which historical and critical verity is -so often compelled, if not to suspect the disease of exaggeration and -the bias of Levitism, at least to feel uncertainty as to the details. -He says that Amaziah collected an army of three hundred thousand men -of Judah, trained them to a high state of discipline, and armed them -with spear and shield. He hired in addition one hundred thousand -Israelitish mercenaries, mighty men of valour, at the heavy cost of -one hundred talents of silver. He was rebuked by a prophet for -employing Israelites, "because the Lord was not with them," so that if -he used their aid he would certainly be defeated. Amaziah asked what -he was to do for the hundred talents, and the prophet told him that -Jehovah could give him much more than this.[283] So he dismissed his -Ephraimites who, returning home in great fury, "fell upon the cities -of Judah," from Samaria even unto Beth-horon, killed three thousand of -their inhabitants, and took much spoil. Amaziah, however, defeated the -Edomites without their aid, and not only slew ten thousand, but took -captive ten thousand more, all of whom he dashed to pieces by hurling -them from the top of the rock of Petra.[284] - -Then, by an apostasy much more astounding than even that of his father -Joash, he took home with him the idols of Mount Seir, worshipped them, -and burnt incense before them. Jehovah sends a prophet to rebuke him -for his senseless infatuation in worshipping the gods of the Edomites -whom he had just so utterly defeated; but Amaziah returns him the -insolent answer, "Who made thee of the king's council? Be silent, or I -will put thee to death." The prophet met his ironical sneer with words -of deeper meaning: "If I am not on _your_ council, I am on God's. -Because thou hast not hearkened to my counsel, I know that God has -counselled to destroy thee." - -The later writer thus accounts for the folly and overthrow of this -valorous and hitherto eminently pious king. Certain it is, as we shall -narrate in the next chapter, that, in spite of warning, he had the -temerity to challenge to battle the warlike Joash ben-Jehoahaz of -Israel, grandson of Jehu. The kings met at Beth-Shemesh, and Amaziah -was utterly routed, with consequences so shameful to himself and to -Jerusalem that he was never able to hold up his head again. He could -but eat away his own heart in despair, a ruined man. After this he -"lived" rather than reigned fifteen years longer.[285] The wall of -Jerusalem, broken down near the Damascus Gate, on the side towards -Israel, for a space of four hundred cubits, was a standing witness of -the king's infatuated folly. His people were ashamed of him, and weary -of him; and at last, seeing that nothing more could be expected of one -whose spirit had evidently been broken from impetuosity into -abjectness, they formed a conspiracy against him. To save his life he -fled to the strong fort of Lachish, a royal Canaanite city, in the -hills to the south-west of Judah.[286] But they pursued him thither, -and even Lachish would not protect him. He was murdered. They threw -the corpse upon a chariot, conveyed it to Jerusalem, and buried it in -the sepulchres of his fathers. The people quietly elevated to the -throne his son Azariah, then sixteen years old, who had been born the -year before his father's crowning disgrace. What became of the -conspirators we do not know. They were probably too strong to be -brought to justice, and we are not told that Azariah even attempted to -visit their crime upon their heads. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[276] Νήπιος ὃς πατέρα κτείνας υἱοὺς καταλείπει. Comp. Q. Curtius, vi. -11: "Lege cautum erat ut propinqui eorum qui regi insidiati cum ipsis -necarentur." Cic., _Ad Brut._, 15. - -[277] 2 Kings viii. 20-22. - -[278] Amos i. 11. - -[279] The Valley (_Gê_) of Salt is "the plain of the Sabkah," about -two miles broad, between the southern end of the Dead Sea and the -hills which separate the Ghôr from the Arabah (Seetzen, _Reisen_, ii. -356; Robinson, _Researches_, ii. 450, 488). David had won a great -victory there (2 Sam. viii. 13; Psalm lx., _title_). - -[280] Selah, "a rock" (Πέτρα). Eusebius calls it Rekem. - -[281] It is the name also of a city of Judah (Josh. xv. 38). - -[282] 2 Chron. xxviii. 17; Jos., _Antt._, XII. viii. 6. - -[283] 2 Chron. xxv. 5-10, 13. - -[284] Κατακρημνισμός. This mode of execution prevailed till quite -recent times in the little republic of Andorra. - -[285] 2 Kings xiv. 17. The phrase that "he _lived_ fifteen years" is -unusual, and seems to imply that the historian saw,-- - - "In more of life true life no more." - - -[286] Josh. x. 6, 31, xv. 39; 2 Kings xviii. 17; 2 Chron. xi. 9. - - - - - CHAPTER XVI - - _THE DYNASTY OF JEHU_ - - B.C. - Jehoahaz 814-797 2 Kings xiii. 1-9 - Joash 797-781 " xiii. 10-21, xiv. 8-16 - Jeroboam II. 781-740 " xiv. 23-29 - Zechariah 740 " xv. 8-12 - - "Them that honour Me I will honour, and they that despise Me shall - be lightly esteemed."--1 SAM. ii. 30. - - -Israel had scarcely ever sunk to so low a nadir of degradation as she -did in the reign of the son of Jehu. We have already mentioned that -some assign to his reign the ghastly story which we have narrated in -our sketch of the work of Elisha. It is told in the sixth chapter of -the Second Book of Kings, and seems to belong to the reign of Jehoram -ben-Ahab; but it may have got displaced from this epoch of yet deeper -wretchedness. The accounts of Jehoahaz in 2 Kings xiii. are evidently -fragmentary and abrupt. - -Jehoahaz reigned seventeen years.[287] Naturally, he did not disturb -the calf-worship, which, like all his predecessors and successors, he -regarded as a perfectly innocent symbolic adoration of Jehovah, whose -name he bore and whose service he professed. Why should he do so? It -had been established now for more than two centuries. His father, in -spite of his passionate and ruthless zeal for Jehovah, had never -attempted to disturb it. No prophet--not even Elijah nor Elisha, the -practical establishers of his dynasty--had said one word to condemn -it. It in no way rested on his conscience as an offence; and the -formal condemnation of it by the historian only reflects the more -enlightened judgment of the Southern Kingdom and of a later age. But -according to the parenthesis which breaks the thread of this king's -story (2 Kings xiii. 5, 6), he was guilty of a far more culpable -defection from orthodox worship; for in his reign, the Asherah--the -tree or pillar of the Tyrian nature-goddess--still remained in -Samaria, and therefore must have had its worshippers. How it came -there we cannot tell. Jezebel had set it up (1 Kings xvi. 33), with -the connivance of Ahab. Jehu apparently had "put it away" with the -great stêlê of Baal (2 Kings iii. 2), but, for some reason or other, -he had not destroyed it. It now apparently occupied some public place, -a symbol of decadence, and provocative of the wrath of Heaven. - -Jehoahaz sank very low. Hazael's savage sword, not content with the -devastation of Bashan and Gilead, wasted the west of Israel also in -all its borders. The king became a mere vassal of his brutal neighbour -at Damascus. So little of the barest semblance of power was left him, -that whereas, in the reign of David, Israel could muster an army of -eight hundred thousand, and in the reign of Joash, the son and -successor of Jehoahaz, Amaziah could hire from Israel one hundred -thousand mighty men of valour as mercenaries, Jehoahaz was only -allowed to maintain an army of ten chariots, fifty horsemen, and ten -thousand infantry! In the picturesque phrase of the historian, "the -King of Syria had threshed down Israel to the dust," in spite of all -that Jehoahaz did, or tried to do, and "all his might." How completely -helpless the Israelites were is shown by the fact that their armies -could offer no opposition to the free passage of the Syrian troops -through their land. Hazael did not regard them as threatening his -rear; for, in the reign of Jehoahaz, he marched southwards, took the -Philistine city of Gath, and threatened Jerusalem. Joash of Judah -could only buy them off with the bribe of all his treasures, and -according to the Chronicler they "destroyed all the princes of the -people," and took great spoil to Damascus.[288] - -Where was Elisha? After the anointing of Jehu he vanishes from the -scene. Unless the narrative of the siege of Samaria has been displaced, -we do not so much as once hear of him for nearly half a century. - -The fearful depth of humiliation to which the king was reduced drove -him to repentance. Wearied to death of the Syrian oppression of which -he was the daily witness, and of the utter misery caused by prowling -bands of Ammonites and Moabites--jackals who waited on the Syrian -lion--Jehoahaz "besought the Lord,[289] and the Lord hearkened unto -him, and gave Israel a saviour, so that they went out from under the -hand of the Syrians: and the children of Israel dwelt in their tents, -as beforetime." If this indeed refers to events which come out of -place in the memoirs of Elisha; and if Jehoahaz ben-Jehu, not Jehoram -ben-Ahab, was the king in whose reign the siege of Samaria was so -marvellously raised, then Elisha may possibly be the temporary -deliverer who is here alluded to.[290] On this supposition we may see -a sign of the repentance of Jehoahaz in the shirt of sackcloth which -he wore under his robes, as it became visible to his starving people -when he rent his clothes on hearing the cannibal instincts which had -driven mothers to devour their own children. But the respite must have -been brief, since Hazael (ver. 22) oppressed Israel all the days of -Jehoahaz. If this rearrangement of events be untenable, we must -suppose that the repentance of Jehoahaz was only so far accepted, and -his prayer so far heard, that the deliverance, which did not come in -his own days, came in those of his son and of his grandson. - -Of him and of his wretched reign we hear no more; but a very different -epoch dawned with the accession of his son Joash, named after the -contemporary King of Judah, Joash ben-Ahaziah. - -In the Books of Kings and Chronicles Joash of Israel is condemned with -the usual refrains about the sins of Jeroboam. No other sin is laid to -his charge; and breaking the monotony of reprobation which tells us of -every king of Israel without exception that "he did that which was -evil in the sight of the Lord," Josephus boldly ventures to call him -"a good man, and the antithesis to his father." - -He reigned sixteen years. At the beginning of his reign he found his -country the despised prey, not only of Syria, but of the paltry -neighbouring bandit-sheykhs who infested the east of the Jordan; he -left it comparatively strong, prosperous, and independent. - -In his reign we hear again of Elisha, now a very old man of past eighty -years. Nearly half a century had elapsed since the grandfather of Joash -had destroyed the house of Ahab at the prophet's command. News came to -the king that Elisha was sick of a mortal sickness, and he naturally -went to visit the death-bed of one who had called his dynasty to the -throne, and had in earlier years played so memorable a part in the -history of his country. He found the old man dying, and he wept over -him, crying, "My father, my father! the chariot of Israel, and the -horsemen thereof."[291] The address strikes us with some surprise. -Elisha had indeed delivered Samaria more than once when the city had -been reduced to direst extremity; but in spite of his prayers and of his -presence, the sins of Israel and her kings had rendered this chariot of -Israel of very small avail. The names of Ahab, Jehu, Jehoahaz, call up -memories of a series of miseries and humiliations which had reduced -Israel to the very verge of extinction. For sixty-three years Elisha had -been the prophet of Israel; and though his public interpositions had -been signal on several occasions, they had not been availing to prevent -Ahab from becoming the vassal of Assyria, nor Israel from becoming the -appanage of the dominion of that Hazael whom Elisha himself had anointed -King of Syria, and who had become of all the enemies of his country the -most persistent and the most implacable. - -The narrative which follows is very singular. We must give it as it -occurs, with but little apprehension of its exact significance. - -Elisha, though Joash "did that which was evil in the sight of the -Lord," seems to have regarded him with affection. He bade the youth -take his bow,[292] and laid his feeble, trembling hands on the strong -hands of the king. Then he ordered an attendant to fling open the -lattice, and told the king to shoot eastward towards Gilead, the -region whence the bands of Syria made their way over the Jordan. The -king shot, and the fire came back into the old prophet's eye as he -heard the arrow whistle eastward. He cried, "The arrow of Jehovah's -deliverance, even the arrow of victory over Syria: for thou shalt -smite the Syrians in Aphek, till thou have consumed them."[293] Then -he bade the young king to take the sheaf of arrows, and smite towards -the ground, as if he was striking down an enemy. Not understanding the -significance of the act, the king made the sign of thrice striking the -arrows downwards, and then naturally stopped.[294] But Elisha was -angry--or at any rate grieved.[295] "You should have smitten five or -six times," he said, "and then you would have smitten Syria to -destruction. Now you shall only smite Syria thrice." The king's fault -seems to have been lack of energy and faith. - -There are in this story some peculiar elements which it is impossible -to explain, but it has one beautiful and striking feature. It tells -us of the death-bed of a prophet. Most of God's greatest prophets have -perished amid the hatred of priests and worldlings. The progress of -the truth they taught has been "from scaffold to scaffold, and from -stake to stake." - - "Careless seems the Great Avenger. History's pages but record - One death-grapple in the darkness 'twixt old systems and the - Word-- - Truth for ever on the scaffold, wrong for ever on the throne; - Yet that scaffold sways the Future, and behind the dim - unknown - Standeth God within the shadow, keeping watch above His own!" - -Now and then, however, as an exception, a great prophetic teacher or -reformer escapes the hatred of the priests and of the world, and dies in -peace. Savonarola is burnt, Huss is burnt, but Wiclif dies in his bed at -Lutterworth, and Luther died in peace at Eisleben. Elijah passed away in -storm, and was seen no more. A king comes to weep by the death-bed of -the aged Elisha. "For us," it has been said, "the scene at his bedside -contains a lesson of comfort and even encouragement. Let us try to -realise it. A man with no material power is dying in the capital of -Israel. He is not rich: he holds no office which gives him any immediate -control over the actions of men; he has but one weapon--the power of his -word. Yet Israel's king stands weeping at his bedside--weeping because -this inspired messenger of Jehovah is to be taken from him. In him both -king and people will lose a mighty support, for this man is a greater -strength to Israel than chariots and horsemen are. Joash does well to -mourn for him, for he has had courage to wake the nation's conscience; -the might of his personality has sufficed to turn them in the true -direction, and rouse their moral and religious life. Such men as Elisha -everywhere and always give a strength to their people above the strength -of armies, for the true blessings of a nation are reared on the -foundations of its moral force." - -The annals are here interrupted to introduce a posthumous -miracle--unlike any other in the whole Bible--wrought by the bones of -Elisha. He died, and they buried him, "giving him," as Josephus says, -"a magnificent burial." As usual, the spring brought with it the -marauding bands of Moabites. Some Israelites who were burying a man -caught sight of them, and, anxious to escape, thrust the man into the -sepulchre of Elisha, which happened to be nearest at hand. But when he -was placed in the rocky tomb, and touched the bones of Elisha, he -revived, and stood up on his feet. Doubtless the story rests on some -real circumstance. There is, however, something singular in the turn -of the original, which says (literally) that the man _went and -touched_ the bones of Elisha;[296] and there is proof that the story -was told in varying forms, for Josephus says that it was the Moabite -plunderers who had killed the man, and that he was thrown by them into -Elisha's tomb.[297] It is easy to invent moral and spiritual lessons -out of this incident, but not so easy to see what lesson is intended -by it. Certainly there is not throughout Scripture any other passage -which even _seems_ to sanction any suspicions of magic potency in the -relics of the dead.[298] - -But Elisha's symbolic prophecy of deliverance from Syria was amply -fulfilled. About this time Hazael had died, and had left his power in -the feebler hands of his son Benhadad III. Jehoahaz had not been able -to make any way against him (2 Kings xiii. 3), but Joash his son -thrice met and thrice defeated him at Aphek. As a consequence of these -victories, he won back all the cities which Hazael had taken from his -father on the west of Jordan. The east of Jordan was never recovered. -It fell under the shadow of Assyria, and was practically lost for ever -to the tribes of Israel. - -Whether Assyria lent her help to Joash under certain conditions we do -not know. Certain it is that from this time the terror of Syria -vanishes. The Assyrian king Rammânirâri III. about this time -subjugated all Syria and its king, whom the tablets call Mari, perhaps -the same as Benhadad III. In the next reign Damascus itself fell into -the power of Jeroboam II., the son of Joash. - -One more event, to which we have already alluded, is narrated in the -reign of this prosperous and valiant king. - -Amity had reigned for a century between Judah and Israel, the result -of the politic-impolitic alliance which Jehoshaphat had sanctioned -between his son Jehoram and the daughter of Jezebel. It was obviously -most desirable that the two small kingdoms should be united as closely -as possible by an offensive and defensive alliance. But the bond -between them was broken by the overweening vanity of Amaziah ben-Joash -of Judah. His victory over the Edomites, and his conquest of Petra, -had puffed him up with the mistaken notion that he was a very great -man and an invincible warrior. He had the wicked infatuation to kindle -an unprovoked war against the Northern Tribes. It was the most wanton -of the many instances in which, if Ephraim did not envy Judah, at -least Judah vexed Ephraim, Amaziah challenged Joash to come out to -battle, that they might look one another in the face. He had not -recognised the difference between fighting with and without the -sanction of the God of battles. - -Joash had on his hands enough of necessary and internecine war to make -him more than indifferent to that bloody game. Moreover, as the superior -of Amaziah in every way, he saw through his inflated emptiness. He knew -that it was the worst possible policy for Judah and Israel to weaken -each other in fratricidal war, while Syria threatened their northern and -eastern frontiers, and while the tread of the mighty march of Assyria -was echoing ominously in the ears of the nations from afar. Better and -kinder feelings may have mingled with these wise convictions. He had no -wish to destroy the poor fool who so vaingloriously provoked his -superior might. His answer was one of the most crushingly contemptuous -pieces of irony which history records, and yet it was eminently kindly -and good-humoured. It was meant to save the King of Judah from advancing -any further on the path of certain ruin. - -"The thistle that was in Lebanon" (such was the apologue which he -addressed to his would-be rival) "sent to the cedar that was in -Lebanon, saying: Give thy daughter to my son to wife.[299] The cedar -took no sort of notice of the thistle's ludicrous presumption, but a -wild beast that was in Lebanon passed by, and trod down the thistle." - -It was the answer of a giant to a dwarf;[300] and to make it quite -clear to the humblest comprehension, Joash good-naturedly added: "You -are puffed up with your victory over Edom: glory in this, and stay at -home. Why by your vain meddling should you ruin yourself and Judah with -you? Keep quiet: I have something else to do than to attend to you." - -Happy had it been for Amaziah if he had taken warning! But vanity is a -bad counsellor, and folly and self-deception--ill-matched pair--were -whirling him to his doom. Seeing that he was bent on his own -perdition, Joash took the initiative and marched to Beth-Shemesh, in -the territory of Judah.[301] There the kings met, and there Amaziah -was hopelessly defeated. His troops fled to their scattered homes, and -he fell into the hands of his conqueror. Joash did not care to take -any sanguinary revenge; but much as he despised his enemy, he thought -it necessary to teach him and Judah the permanent lesson of not again -meddling to their own hurt. He took the captive king with him to -Jerusalem, which opened its gates without a blow.[302] We do not know -whether, like a Roman conqueror, he entered it through the breach of -four hundred cubits which he ordered them to make in the walls,[303] -but otherwise he contented himself with spoil which would swell his -treasure, and amply compensate for the expenses of the expedition -which had been forced upon him. He ransacked Jerusalem for silver and -gold; he made Obed-Edom, the treasurer, give up to him all the sacred -vessels of the Temple, and all that was worth taking from the palace. -He also took hostages--probably from among the number of the king's -sons--to secure immunity from further intrusions. It is the first time -in Scripture that hostages are mentioned. It is to his credit that he -shed no blood, and was even content to leave his defeated challenger -with the disgraced phantom of his kingly power, till, fifteen years -later, he followed his father to the grave through the red path of -murder at the hand of his own subjects.[304] - -After this we hear no further records of this vigorous and able king, -in whom the characteristics of his grandfather Jehu are reflected in -softer outline. He left his son Jeroboam II. to continue his career of -prosperity, and to advance Israel to a pitch of greatness which she -had never yet attained, in which she rivalled the grandeur of the -united kingdom in the earlier days of Solomon's dominion. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[287] I have not thought it worth while to unravel by a series of -uncertain conjectures the careless, and often self-contradictory, -synchronism of the reigns of the kings in the two kingdoms. The compiler -of these books evidently attached little or no importance to accurate -chronology. For instance, the data of 2 Kings xiii. 1, 10, do not -coincide; and instead of entering into tedious, doubtful, and confusing -guesses, I have contented myself throughout with giving for the reigns -of the kings such dates, or approximate dates, as seem to result from -the several notices compared with the contemporary annals of Assyria. - -[288] 2 Chron. xxiv. 23. - -[289] 2 Kings xiii. 4; "besought," literally "_stroked the face of_" -(1 Sam. xiii. 12; 1 Kings xiii. 6). - -[290] The reference is usually explained of Jeroboam II. - -[291] Comp. 2 Kings ii. 12. - -[292] Lit., "Make thine hand to ride upon thy bow." There is not the -slightest taint of belomancy in the story (comp. Ezek. xxi. 21), nor -does it allude to shooting an arrow into an enemy's country as a -declaration of war (Virg., _Æn._, ix. 57). - -[293] Aphek, a name of good omen (1 Kings xx. 26-30). - -[294] Thrice. Comp. Num. xxii. 28; Exod. xxiii. 17, etc. - -[295] LXX., ἐλυπήθη. - -[296] See R.V., margin. - -[297] _Antt._, IX. viii. 6. - -[298] See Ecclus. xlviii. 13: "When he was dead, he prophesied in the -tomb." (But the clause may be spurious.) - -[299] Possibly some matrimonial proposal may have lain behind the -interchange of messages. - -[300] Stade. For similar parables see Judg. ix. 8; Herod., i. 141; -Rawlinson, _Anc. Mon._, iii. 226. - -[301] Beth-Shemesh, "the house of the sun." It is mentioned in 1 Sam. -vi. 9, 12, and was a priestly city, and one of Solomon's store-cities -(1 Kings iv. 9). It ultimately fell into the hands of the Philistines -(2 Chron. xxviii. 18). It is not the Beth-Shemesh of Josh. xix. 22. - -[302] Josephus says that this was the fault of Amaziah, whom Joash of -Israel threatened with death if Jerusalem resisted. - -[303] This implies that at least half the northern wall was -dismantled--the wall towards Ephraim. - -[304] Some have conjectured that Amaziah of Judah became more or less -the vassal of Joash of Israel, and that the vassalage continued till -after the death of Jeroboam II. (1) For Jeroboam II. held Elath till -his death, when Uzziah recovered it (2 Kings xiv. 22), and he -certainly could not have held this southern Judæan port if Judah was -entirely independent; and (2) we read that Uzziah did not become king -at all till the _twenty-seventh_ year of Jeroboam II. But if Amaziah -only survived Joash of Israel fifteen years (2 Kings xiv. 17), Uzziah -must have succeeded in the _fifteenth_ year of Jeroboam. Is the -explanation to be found in the fact that up to that time--for twelve -years--Jeroboam did not allow the Judæans to elect a king? or are -these among the hopeless confusion of synchronism which cannot be -reconciled at all with our present data? - - - - - CHAPTER XVII - - _THE DYNASTY OF JEHU (continued)--JEROBOAM II_ - - B.C. 781-740 - - 2 KINGS xiv. 23-29 - - -If we had only the history of the kings to depend upon, we should -scarcely form an adequate conception either of the greatness of -Jeroboam II. or of the condition of society which prevailed in Israel -during his long and most prosperous reign of forty-one years (B.C. -781-740). In the Books of Chronicles he is merely mentioned -accidentally in a genealogy. The Second Book of Kings only devotes one -verse to him (xiv. 25) beyond the stock formulæ of connection so often -repeated. That verse, however, gives us at least a glimpse of his -great importance, for it tells us that "he restored the coast of -Israel from the entering of Hamath unto the sea of the plain." Those -two lines sufficiently prove to us that he was by far the greatest and -most powerful of all the kings of Israel, as he was also the -longest-lived and had the longest reign. His victories flung a broad -gleam of sunset over the afflicted kingdom, and, for a time, they -might have beguiled the Israelites into lofty hopes for the future; -but with the death of Jeroboam the light instantly faded away, and -there was no after-glow. - -And this sudden brightness, if it deceived others, did not deceive the -prophets of the Lord. It happened in accordance with the promise of -Jehovah given by Jonah, the son of Amittai, of Gath-Hepher;[305] but -Amos and Hosea saw that the glory of the reign was hollow and -delusive, and that the outward prosperity did but "skin and film the -ulcerous place" below. - -In truth, the possibility of this sudden outburst of success was due to -the very enemy who, within a few years, was to grind Israel to powder. -God pitied the deplorable overthrow of His chosen people: He saw that -there was neither slave nor freeman--"neither any shut up, nor any left -at large, nor any helper for Israel"; and in Jeroboam He gave them the -saviour who had been granted to the penitence of Jehoahaz.[306] It was, -so to speak, a last pledge to them of the love and mercy of Jehovah, -which gave them a respite, and would fain have saved them altogether, if -they had turned with their whole heart to Him. And, personally, Jeroboam -II. seems to have been one of the better kings. Not a single crime is -laid to his charge; for under the circumstances of its deep-rooted -continuance through the reigns of all his predecessors, it cannot be -deemed a heinous crime that he did not put down the symbolic cult of -Jehovah by the cherubic emblems at Dan and Bethel. The fact that he had -been named after the founder of the kingdom of Israel shows that the -kingdom was proud of the valiant and Heaven-commissioned rebel who had -thrown off the yoke of the house of Solomon. The house of Jehu admired -his policy and his institutions. The son of Nebat did not by any means -appear in the eyes of his people as only worthy of the monotonous -epitaph, "who made Israel to sin." It is true that now the voice of -prophecy in Israel itself began to denounce the concomitants of the -"calf-worship"; but the voices of the Jewish herdsman of Tekoa and of -the Israelite Hosea probably raised but faint murmurs in the ears of the -warrior-king, with whom they do not seem to have come into personal -contact. In no case would he rank them as equal in importance with the -fiery Elijah or the king-making Elisha, who had been for four -generations the counsellor of his race. Neither of those great prophets -had insisted on the Deuteronomic law of a centralised worship, nor had -they denounced the revered local sanctuaries with which Israel had been -so long familiar. Jonah, indeed--who, if legend be correct, had been the -boy of Zarephath, and the personal attendant of Elijah--had predicted -the king's unbroken success, and had neither made it conditional on a -religious revolution, nor, so far as we know, had in any way censured -the existing institutions. - -What rendered Jeroboam's glory possible was the immediate paralysis -and imminent ruin of the power of Syria. The Israelitish king was -probably on good terms with Assyria, and, during this epoch, three -Assyrian monarchs had struck blow after blow against the house of -Hazael. Damascus and its dependencies had received shattering defeats -at the hands of Rammânirâri III., Shalmaneser III. (782-772), and -Assurdan III. (772-754). Rammânirâri had made expeditions against -Damascus (773) and Hazael (772), and Assurdan had invaded the Syrian -domains in 767, 755, and 754. Syria had more than enough to do to hold -her own in a struggle for life and death against her atrocious -neighbour. With Uzziah in Judah, Jeroboam II. seems to have been on -the friendliest terms; and probably Uzziah acted as a half-independent -vassal, united with him by common interests. The day for Assyria to -threaten Israel had not yet come. Syria lay in the path; and Assurdan -III. had been succeeded by Assurnirari, who gave the world the unusual -spectacle of a peaceful Assyrian king. - -Jeroboam II., therefore, was free to enlarge his domains; and unless -there be a little patriotic exaggeration in the extent and reality of -his prowess, he exercised at least a nominal suzerainty over a realm -nearly as extensive as that of David. He first advanced against -Damascus, and so far "recovered" it as to make it acknowledge his -rule.[307] His father Joash had won back all the Israelite cities -which Benhadad III. had taken from Jehoahaz; and Jeroboam, if he did -not absolutely reconquer the district east of Jordan, yet kept it in -check and repressed the predatory incursions of the Emîrs of Moab and -Ammon.[308] He thus extended the border of Israel to the sea of the -Arabah and "the brook of willows" which divides Edom from Moab.[309] -But this was not all. He pushed his conquests two hundred miles -northwards of Samaria, and became lord of Hamath the Great. Ascending -the gorge of the Litâny between the chains of Libanus and Antilibanus, -which formed the northern limit of Israel, and following the river to -its source near Baalbek, he then descended the Valley of the Orontes, -which constitutes the "pass" or "entering in" of Hamath. Hamath was a -town of the Hittites, the most powerful race of ancient Canaan. They -were not of Semitic origin, but spoke a separate language. They were -the last great branch of the once famous and dominant Khetas, whose -former importance has only recently been revealed by their deciphered -inscriptions. A century and a half earlier the Hamathites had thrown -off the yoke of Solomon, and they governed nearly a hundred dependent -cities. In alliance with the Phœnicians and Syrians, they had been -valuable members of a league, which, though defeated, had long formed -a barrier against the southward movement of the Assyrians. How -striking was the conquest of this city by Jeroboam is shown by the -title of "Hamath the Great," bestowed upon it by the contemporary -prophets,[310] with whom literary prophecy begins. - -The result of these conquests was unwonted peace. Agriculture once -more became possible, when the farmers of Israel were secure that -their crops would not be reaped by plundering Bedouîn. Intercourse -with neighbouring nations was revived, as in the golden days of -Solomon, though it was regarded with suspicion.[311] Civilisation -softened something of the old brutality. Prophecy assumed a different -type, and literature began to dawn. - -But to this state of things there was, as we learn from the -contemporary prophets Amos and Hosea, a darker side. Of Jonah we know -nothing more; for it is impossible to see in the Book of Jonah much -more than a beautiful and edifying story, which may or may not rest on -some surviving legends. It differs from every other prophetic book by -beginning with the word "And," and its late origin and legendary -character cannot any longer be reasonably disputed.[312] We may hope, -therefore, that the Northern prophet, whose home was not far from -Nazareth, was not quite the morose and ruthless grumbler so strikingly -portrayed in the book which bears his name. Of any historical -intervention of his in the affairs of Jeroboam we know nothing further -than the recorded promise of the king's prosperity. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[305] 2 Kings xiv. 25-27. There are other allusions to the historic -events in 2 Kings x. 32, 33, xiii. 3-7, 22-25. Hitzig conjectures that -Isa. xv., xvi., are "a burden of Moab" quoted from Jonah. - -[306] 2 Kings xiii. 5, "The Lord gave Israel a saviour"; xiv. 27, "And -He saved them by the hand of Jeroboam, the son of Joash." Some suppose -the saviour to be the Assyrian King. - -[307] It had owned the feudal supremacy of David (2 Sam. viii. 6), and -Ahab had extorted the privilege of having bazaars there (1 Kings xx. -34). Considering how immense had been the resources of Damascus (2 -Kings vi. 14), which had once been able to send to battle twelve -thousand war-chariots (_Eponym Canon_, p. 108) under Benhadad, we see -how fearfully the Syrian capital must have been weakened. - -[308] If Isa. xv. 1, 2, refers to this invasion of Jeroboam II., as -Hitzig first conjectured, we infer that he had taken both Ar of Moab -(Rabbath) and Kir of Moab, a strong fortress on a hill, by night -assaults; and that he had also captured Dibon, Nebo, and Medeba, and -inflicted on them summary chastisement. It appears that the Moabites -had advanced northwards from the Arnon, while Hazael occupied -Ramoth-Gilead, and had seized part of the tribe of Reuben. Jeroboam -II. first expelled them, and then invaded their own proper country. -Hitzig conjectures that Isa. xv., xvi., are really an old -prophecy--perhaps by Jonah, son of Amittai--which Isaiah quotes, and -to which he adds two verses (Isa. xvi. 12, 13). In such overthrow Moab -must have learnt to be ashamed of Chemosh (Jer. xlviii. 13). - -[309] Isa. xv. 7; Amos vi. 14. - -[310] Amos vi. 2. - -[311] Merchandise had hitherto been considered discreditable for a -pure Jew, so that a trader is called a Canaanite (Hos. xii. 7, 8). - -[312] See the writer's _Minor Prophets_ ("Men of the Bible" Series), -pp. 231-243. - - - - - CHAPTER XVIII - - _AMOS, HOSEA, AND THE KINGDOM OF ISRAEL_ - - 2 KINGS xiv. 23-29; xv. 8-12 - - "In them is plainest taught and easiest learnt - What makes a nation happy and keeps it so, - What ruins kingdoms and lays cities flat." - MILTON, _Paradise Regained_. - - "We see dimly in the Present what is small and what is great, - Slow of faith how weak an arm may turn the iron helm of Fate: - But the soul is still oracular: amid the market's din - List the ominous stern whisper from the Delphic cave within, - 'They enslave their children's children who make compromise with - sin.'" - LOWELL. - - -Amos and Hosea are the two earliest prophets whose "burdens" have come -down to us. From them we gain a near insight into the internal -condition of Israel in this day of her prosperity. - -We see, first, that the prosperity was not unbroken. Though peace -reigned, the people were not left to lapse unwarned into sloth and -godlessness. The land had suffered from the horrible scourge of locusts, -until every _carmel_--every garden of God on hill and plain--withered -before them.[313] There had been widespread conflagrations;[314] there -had been a visitation of pestilence; and, finally, there had been an -earthquake so violent that it constituted an epoch from which dates -were reckoned.[315] There were also two eclipses of the sun, which -darkened with fear the minds of the superstitious.[316] - -Nor was this the worst. Civilisation and commerce had brought luxury in -their train, and all the bonds of morality had been relaxed. The country -began to be comparatively depleted, and the innocent regularity of -agricultural pursuits palled upon the young, who were seduced by the -glittering excitement of the growing towns. All zeal for religion was -looked on as archaic, and the splendour of formal services was regarded -as a sufficient recognition of such gods as there were. As a natural -consequence, the nobles and the wealthy classes were more and more -infected with a gross materialism, which displayed itself in -ostentatious furniture, and sumptuous palaces of precious marbles inlaid -with ivory. The desire for such vanities increased the thirst for gold, -and avarice replenished its exhausted coffers by grinding the faces of -the poor, by defrauding the hireling of his wages, by selling the -righteous for silver, the needy for handfuls of barley, and the poor for -a pair of shoes. The degrading vice of intoxication acquired fresh -vogue, and the gorgeous gluttonies of the rich were further disgraced by -the shameful spectacle of drunkards, who lolled for hours over the -revelries which were inflamed by voluptuous music. Worst of all, the -purity of family life was invaded and broken down. Throwing aside the -old veiled seclusion of women in Oriental life, the ladies of Israel -showed themselves in the streets in all "the bravery of their tinkling -ornaments of gold," and sank into the adulterous courses stimulated by -their pampered effrontery. - -Such is the picture which we draw from the burning denunciations of the -peasant-prophet of Tekoa. He was no prophet nor prophet's son, but a -humble gatherer of sycomore-fruit, a toil which only fell to the -humblest of the people.[317] Who is not afraid, he asks, when a lion -roars? and how can a prophet be silent when the Lord God has spoken? -Indignation had transformed and dilated him from a labourer into a seer, -and had summoned him from the pastoral shades of his native -village--whether in Judah or in Israel is uncertain--to denounce the -more flagrant iniquities of the Northern capital.[318] First he -proclaims the vengeance of Jehovah upon the transgressions of the -Philistines, of Tyre, of Edom, of Ammon, of Moab, and even of Judah; and -then he turns with a crash upon apostatising Israel.[319] He speaks with -unsparing plainness of their pitiless greed, their shameless debauchery, -their exacting usury, their attempts to pervert even the abstinent -Nazarites into intemperance, and to silence the prophets by opposition -and obloquy. Jehovah was crushed under their violence.[320] And did they -think to go unscathed after such black ingratitude? Nay! their mightiest -should flee away naked in the day of defeat. Robbery was in their houses -of ivory, and the few of them who should escape the spoiler should only -be as when a shepherd tears out of the mouth of a lion two legs and a -piece of an ear?[321] As for Bethel, their shrine--which he calls -Bethaven, "House of Vanity," not Bethel, "House of God"--the horns of -its altars should be cut off. Should oppression and licentiousness -flourish? Jehovah would take them with hooks, and their children with -fish-hooks, and their sacrifices at Bethel and Gilgal should be utterly -unavailing. Drought, and blasting, and mildew, and wasting plague, and -earth-convulsions like those which had swallowed Sodom and Gomorrha, -from which they should only be plucked as a "firebrand out of the -burning," should warn them that they must prepare to meet their -God.[322] It was lamentable; but lamentation was vain, unless they would -return to Jehovah, Lord of hosts,[323] and abandon the false worship of -Bethel, Beersheba, and Gilgal, and listen to the voice of the righteous, -whom they now abhorred for his rebukes. They talked hypocritically about -"the day of the Lord," but to them it should be blackness. They relied -on feast days, and services, and sacrifices; but since they would not -give the sacrifice of judgment and righteousness, for which alone God -cared, they should be carried into captivity beyond Damascus: yes! even -to that terrible Assyria with whose king they now were on friendly -terms. They lay at ease on their carved couches at their delicate -feasts, draining the wine-bowls, and glistering with fragrant oils, -heedless of the impending doom which would smite the great house with -breaches and the little house with clefts, and which should bring upon -them an avenger who should afflict them from their conquered Hamath -southwards even to the wady of the wilderness.[324] The threatened -judgments of locusts and fire had been mitigated at the prophet's -prayer, but nothing could avert the plumb-line of destruction which -Jehovah held over them, and He would rise against the House of Jeroboam -with His sword.[325] We infer from all that Amos and Hosea say that the -calf-worship at Bethel (for Dan is not mentioned in this connexion[326]) -had degenerated into an idolatry far more abject than it originally -was. The familiarity of such multitudes of the people with Baal-worship -and Asherah-worship had tended to obliterate the sense that the "calves" -were cherubic emblems of Jehovah; and were it not for some confusions of -this kind, it is inconceivable that Jehoram ben-Jehu should have -restored the Asherah which his father had removed. Be that as it may, -Bethel and Gilgal seem to have become centres of corruption. Dan is -scarcely once alluded to as a scene of the calf-worship. - -Others, then, might be deceived by the surface-glitter of extended -empire in the days of Jeroboam II. Not so the true prophets. It has -often happened--as to Persia, when, in B.C. 388, she dictated the -Peace of Antalcidas, and to Papal Rome in the days of the Jubilee of -1300, and to Philip II. of Spain in the year of the Armada, and to -Louis XIV. in 1667--that a nation has seemed to be at its zenith of -pomp and power on the very eve of some tremendous catastrophe. Amos -and Hosea saw that such a catastrophe was at hand for Israel, because -they knew that Divine punishment inevitably dogs the heels of -insolence and crime. The loftiness of Israel's privilege involved the -utterness of her ruin. "You only have I known of all the families of -the earth: therefore I will visit upon you all your iniquities."[327] - -Such prophecies, so eloquent, so uncompromising, so varied, and so -constantly disseminated among the people, first by public harangues, -then in writing, could no longer be neglected. Amos, with his natural -culture, his rhythmic utterances, and his inextinguishable fire, was far -different from the wild fanatics, with their hairy garments, and sudden -movements, and long locks, and cries, and self-inflicted wounds, with -whom Israel had been familiar since the days of Elijah whom they all -imitated. So long as this inspired peasant confined himself to moral -denunciations the aristocracy and priesthood of Samaria could afford -comfortably to despise him. What were moral denunciations to them? What -harm was there in ivory palaces and refined feasts? This man was a mere -red socialist who tried to undermine the customs of society. The hold of -the upper classes on the people, whom their exactions had burdened with -hopeless debt, and whom they could with impunity crush into slavery, was -too strong to be shaken by the "hysteric gush" of a philanthropic -faddist and temperance fanatic like this. But when he had the enormous -presumption to mention publicly the name of their victorious king, and -to say that Jehovah would rise against him with the sword, it was time -for the clergy to interfere, and to send the intruder back to his native -obscurity. - -So Amaziah, the priest of Bethel,[328] invoked the king's authority. -"Amos," he said to the king, "hath conspired against thee in the midst -of the house of Israel." The charge was grossly false, but it did well -enough to serve the priest's purpose. "The land is not able to bear -all his words." - -That was true; for when nations have chosen to abide by their own -vicious courses, and refuse to listen to the voice of warning, they -are impatient of rebuke. They refuse to hear when God calls to them. - - "For when we in our viciousness grow hard, - Oh misery on it! the wise gods seal our eyes; - In our own filth drop our clear judgments; make us - Adore our errors; laugh at us while we strut - To our confusion." - -The priest tried further to inflame the king's anger by telling him -two more of Amos's supposed predictions. He had prophesied (which was -a false inference) that Israel should be led away captive out of their -own land,[329] and had also prophesied (which was a perversion of the -fact) "that Jeroboam _should die_ by the sword." - -At the first prophecy Jeroboam probably smiled. It might indeed come -true in the long-run. If he was a man of prescience as well as of -prowess, he probably foresaw that the elements of ruin lurked in his -transient success, and that though, for the present, Assyria was -occupied in other directions, it was unlikely that the weaker Israel -would escape the fate of the far more powerful Syria. As for the -personal prophecy, he was strong, and was honoured, and had his army -and his guards. He would take his chance. Nor does it seem to have -troubled any one that Amos looked for the ultimate union of Israel -with Judah. Since the time of Joash the inheritance of David had been -but as "a ruined booth" (ix. 11); but Amos prophesied its restoration. -This touch may have been added later, when he wrote and published his -"burdens"; but he did not hesitate to speak as if the two kingdoms -were really and properly one.[330] - -We are not told that Jeroboam II. interfered with the prophet in any -way.[331] Had he done so, he would have been rebuked and denounced for -it. He probably went no further than to allow the priest and the -prophet to settle the matter between themselves. Perhaps he gave a -contemptuous permission that, if Amaziah thought it worth while to -send the prophet back into Judah, he might do so. - -Armed with this nonchalant mandate, Amaziah, with more mildness and -good-humour than might have been expected from one of his class, said -to Amos, "O Seer,[332] go home, and eat thy bread, and prophesy to thy -heart's content at home; but do not prophesy any more at Bethel, for -it is the king's sanctuary and the king's court." - -Amos obeyed perforce, but stopped to say that he had not prophesied -out of his own mouth, but by Jehovah's bidding. He then hurled at the -priest a message of doom as frightful as that which Jeremiah -pronounced upon Pashur, when that priest smote him on the face. His -wife should be a harlot in the city; his sons and daughters should be -slain; his inheritance should be divided; he should die in a polluted -land; and Israel should go into captivity. And as for his mission, he -justified it by the fact that he was not one of an hereditary or a -professional community; he was no prophet or prophet's son. Such men -might--like Zedekiah, the son of Chenaanah, and his four hundred -abettors--be led into mere function and professionalism, into -manufactured enthusiasm and simulated inspiration. From such -communities freshness, unconventionality, courage, were hardly to be -expected. They would philippise at times; they would get to love their -order and their privileges better than their message, and themselves -best of all. It is the tendency of organised bodies to be tempted into -conventionality, and to sink into banded unions chiefly concerned in -the protection of their own prestige. Not such was Amos. He was a -peasant herdsman in whose heart had burned the inspiration of Jehovah -and the wrath against moral misdoing till they had burst into flame. -It was indignation against iniquity which had called Amos from the -flocks and the sycomores to launch against an apostatising people the -menace of doom. In that grief and indignation he heard the voice and -received the mandate of the Lord of hosts. He heads the long line of -literary prophets whose priceless utterances are preserved in the Old -Testament. The inestimable value of their teaching lies most of all in -the fact that they were--like Moses--preachers of the moral law; and -that, like the Book of the Covenant, which is the most ancient and the -most valuable part of the Laws of the Pentateuch, they count external -service as no better than the small dust of the balance in comparison -with righteousness and true holiness. - -The rest of the predictions of Amos were added at a later date. They -dwelt on the certainty and the awful details of the coming overthrow; -the doom of the idolaters of Gilgal and Beersheba; the inevitable -swiftness of the catastrophe in which Samaria should be sifted like -corn in a sieve in spite of her incorrigible security.[333] Yet the -ruin should not be absolute. "Thus saith Jehovah: As the shepherd -teareth out of the mouth of the lion two legs and the piece of an ear, -so shall the children of Israel be rescued, that sit in Samaria on the -corner of a couch, and on the damask of a bed." - -The Hebrew Prophets almost invariably weave together the triple strands -of warning, exhortation, and hope. Hitherto Amos has not had a word of -hope to utter. At last, however, he lets a glimpse of the rainbow -irradiate the gloom. The overthrow of Israel should be accompanied by -the restoration of the fallen booth of David, and, under the rule of a -scion of that house, Israel should return from captivity to enjoy days -of peaceful happiness, and to be rooted up no more.[334] - - * * * * * - -Hosea, the son of Beeri, was of a somewhat later date than Amos. He, -too, "became electric," to flash into meaner and corrupted minds the -conviction that formalism is nothing, and that moral sincerity is all -in all. That which God requires is not ritual service, but truth in -the inward parts. He is one of the saddest of the prophets; but -though he mingles prophecies of mercy with his menaces of wrath, the -general tenor of his oracles is the same. He pictures the crimes of -Ephraim by the image of domestic unfaithfulness, and bids Judah to -take warning from the curse involved in her apostasy.[335] Many of his -allusions touch upon the days of that deluge of anarchy which followed -the death of Jeroboam II. (iv.-vi. 3). That he was a Northerner -appears from the fact that he speaks of the King of Israel as "our -king" (vii. 5). Yet he seems to blame the revolt of Jeroboam I. (i. -11, viii. 4), although a prophet had originated it, and he openly -aspires after the reunion of the Twelve Tribes under a king of the -House of David (iii. 5). He points more distinctly to Assyria, which -he frequently names as the scourge of the Divine vengeance, and -indicates how vain is the hope of the party which relied on the -alliance of Egypt.[336] He speaks with far more distinct contempt of -the cherub at Bethel and the shrine at Gilgal, and says scornfully, -"Thy calf, O Samaria, has cast thee off."[337] Shalmaneser had taken -Beth-Arbel, and dashed to pieces mother and children. Such would be -the fate of the cities of Israel.[338] Yet Hosea, like Amos, cannot -conclude with words of wrath and woe, and he ends with a lovely song -of the days when Ephraim should be restored, after her true -repentance, by the loving tenderness of God. - -Jeroboam II. must have been aware of some at least of these prophecies. -Those of Hosea must have impressed him all the more because Hosea was a -prophet of his own kingdom, and all of his allusions were to such -ancient and famous shrines of Ephraim as Mizpeh, Tabor, Bethel, Gilgal, -Shechem,[339] Jezreel, and Lebanon. He was the Jeremiah of the North, -and a passionate patriotism breathes through his melancholy strains. Yet -in the powerful rule of Jeroboam II. he can only see a godless -militarism founded upon massacre (i. 4), and he felt himself to be the -prophet of decadence. Page after page rings with wailing, and with -denunciations of drunkenness, robbery, and whoredom--"swearing, lying, -killing, stealing, and adultery" (iv. 2). - -If Jeroboam was as wise and great as he seemed to have been, he must -have seen with his own eyes the ominous clouds on the far horizon, and -the deep-seated corruption which was eating like a cancer into the -heart of his people. Probably, like many another great sovereign--like -Marcus Aurelius when he noted the worthlessness of his son Commodus, -like Charlemagne when he burst into tears at the sight of the ships of -the Vikings--his thoughts were like those of the ancient and modern -proverbs--"When I am dead, let earth be mixed with fire." We have no -trace that Jeroboam treated Hosea as did those guilty priests to whom -he was a rebuke, and who called him "a fool" and "mad" (ix. 7, 8, iv. -6-8, v. 2). Yet the aged king--he must have reached the unusual age -of seventy-three at least, before he ended the longest and most -successful reign in the annals of Israel--could hardly have -anticipated that within half a year of his death his secure throne -would be shaken to its foundation, his dynasty be hurled into -oblivion, and that Israel, to whom, as long as he lived, mighty -kingdoms had curtsied, should, - - "Like a forlorn and desperate castaway, - Do shameful execution on herself." - -Yet so it was. Jeroboam II. was succeeded by no less than six other -kings, but he was the last who died a natural death. Every one of his -successors fell a victim to the assassin or the conqueror. His son -Zachariah ("Remembered by Jehovah") succeeded him (B.C. 740), the -fourth in descent from Jehu. Considering the long reign of his father, -he must have ascended the throne at a mature age. But he was the child -of evil times. That he should not interrupt the "calf"-worship was a -matter of course; but if he be the king of whom we catch a glimpse in -Hos. vii. 2-7, we see that he partook deeply of the depravity of his -day. We are there presented with a deplorable picture. There was -thievishness at home, and bands of marauding bandits began to appear -from abroad. The king was surrounded by a desperate knot of wicked -counsellors, who fooled him to the top of his bent, and corrupted him -to the utmost of his capacity. They were all scorners and adulterers, -whose furious passions the prophet compares to the glowing heat of an -oven heated by the baker. They made the king glad with their -wickedness, and the princes with lying flatteries. On the royal -birthday, apparently at some public feast, this band of infamous -revellers, who were the boon companions of Zachariah, first made him -sick with bottles of wine, and then having set an ambush in waiting, -murdered the effeminate and self-indulgent debauchee before all the -people.[340] The scene reads like the assassination of a Commodus or -an Elagabalus. No one was likely to raise a hand in his favour. Like -our Edward II., he was a weakling who followed a great and warlike -father. It was evident that troublous times were near at hand, and -nothing but the worst disasters could ensue if there was no one better -than such a drunkard as Zachariah to stand at the helm of state. - -So did the dynasty of the mighty Jehu expire like a torch blown out in -stench and smoke. - -Its close is memorable most of all because it evoked the magnificent -moral and spiritual teaching of Hebrew prophecy. The ideal prophet and -the ordinary priest are as necessarily opposed to each other as the -saint and the formalist. The glory of prophecy lies in its recognition -that right is always right, and wrong always wrong, apart from all -expediency and all casuistry, apart from "all prejudices, private -interests, and partial affections." "What Jehovah demands," they -taught, "is righteousness--neither more nor less; what He hates is -injustice. Sin or offence to the Deity is a thing of purely moral -character. Morality is that for the sake of which all other things -exist; it is the most essential element of all sincere religion. It is -no postulate, no idea, but a necessity and a fact; the most intensely -living of human powers--Jehovah, the God of hosts. In wrath, in ruin, -this holy reality makes its existence known; it annihilates all that -is hollow and false."[341] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[313] Amos vii. 1. Famine (iv. 6); drought (iv. 7, 8); yellow blight -and locusts (iv. 9); pestilence (iv. 10); earthquake and burning (iv. -11). - -[314] Amos vii. 4. - -[315] Amos i. 1, iii. 14, iv. 11, viii 8; Zech. xiv. 5: "Ye shall flee -like as ye fled before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah." Josephus -says that in an earthquake a little before the birth of Christ ten -thousand were buried under the ruined houses (_Antt._, XV. v. 2), and -he has many Rabbinic haggadoth to tell us about the earthquake, which, -he says, happened at the moment when Uzziah burnt incense in the -Temple (_Antt._, IX. x. 4). - -[316] According to Hind, they took place on June 15th, B.C. 763, and -February 9th, B.C. 784. Amos alludes to the capture of Gath by Uzziah, -of Calneh (_Ktesiphon_), and of Hamath (vi. 2; 2 Chron. xxvi. 6). Gath -henceforth disappears from the Philistian Pentapolis (Amos i. 7, 8; -Zeph. ii. 4; Zech. ix. 5). - -[317] Or "dresser of sycomore-trees" (R.V.). LXX., κνίζων συκάμινα; -Vulg., _vellicans sycomoros_. The sycomore-fruit (fruit of the _Ficus -sycomorus_, or wild fig) is ripened by puncturing it (Theoph., _H. -Plant._, iv. 2; Pliny, _H. N._, xiii. 14). - -[318] The well-known town of Tekoa had been Solomon's horse-fair, and -had been fortified by Rehoboam (2 Chron. xi. 6). It lay in a wild -country six miles south of Bethlehem (2 Chron. xx. 20; 1 Macc. ix. 33; -Robinson, _Bibl. Res._, i. 486). For a fuller account of these -prophets, I must refer to my book on _The Minor Prophets_ in the "Men -of the Bible" Series. It has always been assumed that Amos belonged to -the well-known Tekoa, and was therefore a subject of the Southern -Kingdom. In recent days this has become uncertain. No sycomores grow -or can grow on the bleak uplands of Tekoa (Tristram, _Nat. Hist. of -the Bible_, p. 397); so that Jerome, in his preface to Amos, thinks -that "brambles" are intended. Even Kimchi conjectured that Tekoa was -an unknown town in the tribe of Asher. Amos's allusions to scenery are -all applicable to the Northern landscape. - -[319] Amos i. 1-ii. 5. - -[320] Amos ii. 6-13. - -[321] Amos iii. 9-15. - -[322] Amos iv. 1-13. - -[323] This title, "Jehovah-Tsebaoth," now begins to occur. It is not -found in the Hexateuch. It probably means "Lord of the _starry hosts_." -Contact with Assyria first made the Israelites acquainted with -star-worship. Amos alludes to the Pleiades and Orion (v. 8: comp. Job -ix. 9, xxxviii. 31). Star-worship is forbidden in Deuteronomy. In Amos -v. 26 the true meaning is that the Israelites _would take with them, on -their road to exile_, Sakkuth (Moloch?) and Kewan (the god-star Saturn). - -[324] Amos vi. 1-14. - -[325] Amos vii. 1-9. - -[326] Strange as it may seem, the early authority for the existence of -any calf at Dan is very slight, and the extreme uncertainty of the -reading and interpretation in one main passage (1 Kings xii. 32) makes -it at least possible that there were _two calves at Bethel_, and that -at Dan there was no calf, but only the old idolatrous ephod of Micah, -still served by the servant of Moses. See additional note at the end -of the volume. - -[327] Amos iii. 2. - -[328] That the chief priest of Bethel bore the name "Jehovah is -strong" shows once more that "calf-worship" was in no sense a -_substitute_ for the worship of Jehovah. - -[329] This was not quite accurate; he had rather prophesied the -devastation of the high places (vii. 9). In fact, his words had often -been very vague. "_Thus_ will I do unto thee" (iv. 12). - -[330] Amos ix. 11-15. Comp. Hos. iii. 5. - -[331] The exaggerated haggadoth of later days say that Amaziah had -Amos beaten with leaded thongs, and that he was carried home in a -dying state (Epiphan., _Opp._, ii. 145), to which there is a supposed -allusion in Heb. xi. 35: ἄλλοι δὲ ἐτυμπανίσθησαν. - -[332] We cannot be sure that the term "Seer" was meant to be -contemptuous, although from 1 Sam. ix. 9 we should infer that the -title had become somewhat obsolete. Further, we must bear in mind that -it may not have been always easy for worldlings to distinguish between -true prophets and the unprincipled pretenders who, about this time, -succeeded in making the name and aspect of a prophet so complete a -disgrace that men had carefully to disclaim it (Zech. xiii. 2-6). It -is true that the heading of Amos (i. 1), which may not, however, be by -the prophet himself, tells us of "the words which he _saw_" (_i.e._, -spoke as a seer), and he also disclaims the name of prophet (vii. 14). - -[333] Amos viii. 1-ix. 9, 10. - -[334] Amos ix. 11-15. - -[335] Hos. iv. 15-19. - -[336] Hos. v. 13, vii. 11, viii. 9, ix. 3-6, xi. 5, xii. 1, xiv. 3. It -must be borne in mind that the cuneiform inscriptions prove that -Assyria had burst into sight like a lurid comet on the horizon far -earlier than we had supposed. Jehu had paid tribute to Shalmaneser as -far back as B.C. 842, more than a century before Menahem's tribute in -738. The destruction which Hosea prophesied took place within -thirty-one years of his prophecies--probably in B.C. 722, when Sargon -finished the siege of Samaria begun by Shalmaneser. The king Hoshea -was perhaps taken captive before the siege. - -[337] Hos. viii. 5, ix. 15. - -[338] Hos. x. 13, 14. - -[339] Hos. vi. 9: for "by consent" read "towards Shechem." - -[340] Hos. vii. 3-7. The allusions are vague, but we see a drunken -king among his drunken princes, surrounded by wicked plotters who have -flattered his vices. He is ignorant of his peril. The subjects aid the -rulers in these abominations. All are blazing, like an oven, with -passion and infamy, and only rest (as the baker does) to acquire new -strength for inflaming their burning desires. At the dawn their -treachery blazes into the crime of murder, and in the wine-sick -fever-heat of the banquet the king is murdered by his corrupt -intimates (see my _Minor Prophets_, p. 78). - -[341] Wellhausen, _Isr. and Jud._, 85. - - - - - CHAPTER XIX - - _AZARIAH-UZZIAH_ (B.C. 783(?)-737) - - _JOTHAM_ (B.C. 737-735) - - 2 KINGS xv. 1-7, 32-38 - - "This is vanity, and it is a sore sickness."--ECCLES. vi. 2. - - -Before we watch the last "glimmerings and decays" of the Northern -Kingdom, we must once more revert to the fortunes of the House of David. -Judah partook of the better fortunes of Israel. She, too, enjoyed the -respite caused by the crippling of the power of Syria, and the cessation -from aggression of the Assyrian kings, who, for a century, were either -unambitious monarchs like Assurdan, or were engaged in fighting on their -own northern and eastern frontiers. Judah, too, like Israel, was happy -in the long and wise governance of a faithful king. - -This king was Azariah ("My strength is Jehovah"), the son of Amaziah. He -is called Uzziah by the Chronicler, and in some verses of the brief -references to his long reign in the Book of Kings. It is not certain -that he was the eldest son of Amaziah;[342] but he was so distinctly the -ablest, that, at the age of sixteen, he was chosen king by "all the -people." His official title to the world must have been Azariah, for in -that form his name occurs in the Assyrian records. Uzziah seems to have -been the more familiar title which he bore among his people.[343] There -seems to be an allusion to both names--Jehovah-his-helper, and -Jehovah-his-strength--in the Chronicles: "God _helped him_, and made him -to prosper; and his name spread far abroad, and he was marvellously -helped, _till he was strong_." - -The Book of Kings only devotes a few verses to him; but from the -Chronicler we learn much more about his prosperous activity. His first -achievement was to recover and fortify the port of Elath, on the Red -Sea,[344] and to reduce the Edomites to the position they had held in -the earlier days of his father's reign. This gave security to his -commerce, and at once "his name spread far abroad, even to the -entering in of Egypt." - -He next subdued the Philistines; took Gath, Jabneh, and Ashdod; -dismantled their fortifications, filled them with Hebrew colonists, -and "smote all Palestine with a rod."[345] - -He then chastised the roving Arabs of the Negeb or south country in -Gur-Baal and Maon, and suppressed their plundering incursions. - -His next achievement was to reduce the Ammonite Emîrs to the position -of tributaries, and to enforce from them rights of pasturage for his -large flocks, not only in the low country (_shephelah_), but in the -southern wilderness (_midbar_), and in the _carmels_ or fertile -grounds among the Trans-Jordanic hills. - -Having thus subdued his enemies on all sides, he turned his attention -to home affairs--built towers, strengthened the walls of Jerusalem at -its most assailable points, provided catapults and other instruments -of war, and rendered a permanent benefit to Jerusalem by irrigation -and the storing of rain-water in tanks. - -All these improvements so greatly increased his wealth and importance -that he was able to renew David's old force of heroes (Gibborim), and to -increase their number from six hundred to two thousand six hundred, whom -he carefully enrolled, equipped with armour, and trained in the use of -engines of war. And he not only extended his boundaries southwards and -eastwards, but appears to have been strong enough, after the death of -Jeroboam II., to make an expedition northwards, and to have headed a -Syrian coalition against Tiglath-Pileser III., in B.C. 738. He is -mentioned in two notable fragments of the annals of the eighth year of -this Assyrian king. He is there called Azrijahu, and both his forces and -those of Hamath seem to have suffered a defeat.[346] - -It is distressing to find that a king so good and so great ended his -days in overwhelming and irretrievable misfortune. The glorious reign -had a ghastly conclusion. All that the historian tells us is that "the -Lord smote the king, so that he was a leper, and dwelt in a several -[_i.e._, a separate] house." The word rendered "a several house" may -perhaps mean (as in the margin of the A.V.) "a lazar house," like the -_Beit el Massakîn_ or "house of the unfortunate," the hospital or -abode of lepers, outside the walls of Jerusalem.[347] The rendering is -uncertain, but it is by no means impossible that the prevalence of the -affliction had, even in those early days, created a retreat for those -thus smitten, especially as they formed a numerous class. Obviously -the king could no more fulfil his royal duties. A leper becomes a -horrible object, and no one would have been more anxious than the -unhappy Azariah himself to conceal his aspect from the eyes of his -people.[348] His son Jotham was set over the household; and though he -is not called a regent or joint-king--for this institution does not -seem to have existed among the ancient Hebrews--he acted as judge over -the people of the land. - -We are told that Isaiah wrote the annals of this king's reign, but we -do not know whether it was from Isaiah's biography that the Chronicler -took the story of the manner in which Uzziah was smitten with leprosy. -The Chronicler says that his heart was puffed up with his successes -and his prosperity, and that he was consequently led to thrust himself -into the priest's office by burning incense in the Temple.[349] -Solomon appears to have done the same without the least question of -opposition; but now the times were changed, and Azariah, the high -priest,[350] and eighty of his colleagues went in a body to prevent -Uzziah, to rebuke him, and to order him out of the Holy Place.[351] -The opposition kindled him into the fiercest anger, and at this moment -of hot altercation the red spot of leprosy suddenly rose and burned -upon his forehead. The priests looked with horror on the fatal sign; -and the stricken king, himself horrified at this awful visitation of -God, ceased to resist the priests, and rushed forth to relieve the -Temple of his unclean presence, and to linger out the sad remnant of -his days in the living death of that most dishonouring disease. Surely -no man was ever smitten down from the summits of splendour to a lower -abyss of unspeakable calamity! We can but trust that the misery only -laid waste the few last years of his reign; for Jotham was twenty-five -when he began to reign, and he must have been more than a mere boy -when he was set to perform his father's duties. - -So the glory of Uzziah faded into dust and darkness. At the age of -sixty-eight death came as the welcome release from his miseries, and -"they buried him with his fathers in the City of David." The -Levitically scrupulous Chronicler adds that he was not laid in the -actual sepulchre of his fathers, but in a field of burial which -belonged to them--"for they said, He is a leper." The general outline -of his reign resembled that of his father's. It began well; it fell by -pride; it closed in misery. - -The annals of his son Jotham were not eventful, and he died at the age -of forty-one or earlier. He is said to have reigned sixteen years, but -there are insuperable difficulties about the chronology of his reign, -which can only be solved by hazardous conjectures.[352] He was a good -king, "howbeit the high places were not removed." The Chronicler -speaks of him chiefly as a builder. He built or restored the northern -gate of the Temple, and defended Judah with fortresses and towns. But -the glory and strength of his father's reign faded away under his -rule. He did indeed suppress a revolt of the Ammonites, and exacted -from them a heavy indemnity; but shortly afterwards the inaction of -Assyria led to an alliance between Pekah, King of Israel, and Rezin, -King of Damascus; and these kings harassed Jotham--perhaps because he -refused to become a member of their coalition. The good king must also -have been pained by the signs of moral degeneracy all around him in -the customs of his own people. It was "in the year that King Uzziah -died" that Isaiah saw his first vision, and he gives us a deplorable -picture of contemporary laxity. Whatever the king may have been, the -princes were no better than "rulers of Sodom," and the people were -"people of Gomorrha." There was abundance of lip-worship, but little -sincerity; plentiful religionism, but no godliness. Superstition went -hand in hand with formalism, and the scrupulosity of outward service -was made a substitute for righteousness and true holiness. This was -the deadliest characteristic of this epoch, as we find it portrayed in -the first chapter of Isaiah. The faithful city had become a -harlot--but not in outward semblance. She "reflected heaven on her -surface, and hid Gomorrha in her heart." Righteousness had dwelt in -her--but now murderers; but the murderers wore phylacteries, and for a -pretence made long prayers. It was this deep-seated hypocrisy, this -pretence of religion without the reality, which called forth the -loudest crashes of Isaiah's thunder. There is more hope for a country -avowedly guilty and irreligious than for one which makes its -scrupulous ceremonialism a cloak of maliciousness. And thus there lay -at the heart of Isaiah's message that protest for bare morality, as -constituting the end and the essence of religion, which we find in all -the earliest and greatest prophets:-- - - "Hear the word of the Lord, ye rulers of Sodom; - Give ear unto the Law of our God, ye people of Gomorrha! - To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith - the Lord. - I am full of the burnt-offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; - And I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of - he-goats. - When ye come to see My face, who hath required this at your hands, to - trample My courts? - Bring no more vain oblations! - Incense is an abomination unto Me: - New moon and sabbath, the calling of assemblies-- - I cannot away with iniquity and the solemn meeting... - Wash you! make you clean!"[353] - -Of Jotham we hear nothing more. He died a natural death at an early -age. If the years of his reign are counted from the time when his -father's affliction devolved on him the responsibilities of office, it -is probable that he did not long survive the illustrious leper, but -was buried soon after him in the City of David his father. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[342] Hence, perhaps, the expression that the people "took him." If -Amaziah died at fifty-nine, he probably had other sons. - -[343] Compare the interchange of the names Azariel and Uzziel (Exod. -vi. 18) in 1 Chron. vi. 2, 18. Azariah means "Jehovah hath helped," -and Uzziah "Strength of Jehovah." It is just possible that his name -was changed at his accession, as the chief priest also was named -Azariah, and confusion might otherwise have arisen. - -[344] 2 Chron. xxvi. 2-15. - -[345] Isa. xiv. 29. A mixed language arose in this district in -consequence (Neh. xiii. 24; Zech. ix. 6). The word Palestine only -applies strictly to the district of Philistia. Milton uses it, with -his usual accuracy, in the description of Dagon as - - "That twice-battered god of Palestine." - -[346] Uzziah's opposition to Assyria--of which there seems to be no -doubt, for he must be the Azrijahu of the _Eponym Canon_--took place -about 738, and was a coalition movement. But it gives rise to great -chronological and other difficulties. As the solution of these is at -present only conjectural, I refer to Schrader (E. Tr.), ii. 211-219. -He is called Azrijahu Jahudai. - -[347] 2 Kings xv. 5 (2 Chron. xxvi. 21, "a house of sickness"). LXX., ἐν -οἴκῳ ἀφφουσώθ; Vulg., _in domo libera seorsim_. Comp Lev. xiii. 46. -Theodoret understands it that he was shut up privately in his own -palace: ἔνδον ἐν θαλάμῳ ὑπ' οὐδένος ὁρώμενος. Symmachus, ἐγκεκλεισμένος. - -[348] His misfortune must have made a deep impression, and is possibly -alluded to in Hos. iv. 4: "For thy people are as they that strive with -the priest." - -[349] The Chronicler attributes the good part of his reign to the -influence of an unknown Zechariah, "who had understanding in the -visions of God"; and says that when Zechariah died Uzziah altered for -the worse. - -[350] This high priest, Azariah, is only mentioned elsewhere in 2 -Chron. xxvi. 17, 20. - -[351] Josephus says that he had put on a priestly robe, and that a -great feast was going on, and that the earthquake (Amos i. 1; Zech. -xiv. 5) happened at the moment, which broke the Temple roof, so that a -sunbeam smote his head and produced the leprosy. We here see the -growth of the Haggadah. - -[352] For instance, two verses earlier (2 Kings xv. 30) we read of the -twentieth year of Jotham. - -[353] Isa. i. 10-17. - - - - - CHAPTER XX. - - _THE AGONY OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM._ - - B.C. - Shallum 740 - Menahem 740-737 - Pekahiah 737-735 - Pekah 735-734 - - 2 KINGS xv. 8-31 - - "Blood toucheth blood."--HOS. iv. 2. - - "The revolters are profuse in murders."--HOS. v. 2. - - "They have set up kings, but not by Me: they have made princes, - and I knew it not."--HOS. viii. 4. - - "Non tam reges fuere quam fures, latrones, et tyranni."--WITSIUS, - _Decaph._, 326. - - -With the death of Zachariah begins the acute agony of Israel's -dissolution. Four kings were murdered in forty years. Indeed, within -two centuries, at least nine kings--Nadab, Elah, Zimri, Tibni, -Jehoram, Zachariah, Shallum, Pekahiah, Pekah--had made the steps of -the throne slippery with blood. Except in the house of Omri, all the -kings of Israel either left no sons or left them to be slain. Amos, by -his vision of the basket of summer fruit, had intimated that the sins -of Israel were ripe for punishment, and the lesson had been emphasised -by the paronomasia of _quîts_, "summer," and _queets_, "end."[354] The -prophet had singled four out of many crimes as the cause of her ruin. -They were (1) greedy oppression of the poor; (2) land-grabbing; (3) -licentious and idolatrous revelries; (4) cruelty to poor debtors, and -rioting on the proceeds of unjust gains. In their drunkenness they -even tempted God's Nazarites to break their vows. "Behold," saith -Jehovah, "I am pressed under you, as a cart is pressed that is full of -sheaves." Even women shared in the common intoxication, and showed -themselves utterly shameless, so that Amos contemptuously calls them -"fat cows of Bashan upon the mountain of Samaria," whom in punishment -the brutal conqueror should drag by the hair out of their ivory -palaces, as a fisherman drags his prey out of the water by hooks.[355] - -Shallum, son of Jabesh, the unknown murderer of Zachariah and the -usurper of his throne, suffered the fate of Zimri, and only reigned for -one month. If his conspiracy was marked by the odious circumstances of -treachery and corruption, which we infer from the allusions of Hosea, -Shallum richly deserved the swift retribution which fell upon him. He -seems to have destroyed Zachariah by means of his best affections--under -the guise of friendship, in the midst of boon companionship. But the -slayer of his master had no peace, and from the moment of his fruitless -crime the unhappy country seems to have been plunged in the horrors of -civil war. Some dim glimpses of the evils of the day are gained from the -earlier Zechariah,[356] just as some dim glimpses of the horrors of Rome -in the days of the later Cæsars may be seen in the Apocalypse. The -prophet speaks of three shepherds cut off in one month, who abhorred -God, and His soul was impatient at them.[357] - -Just as Galba, Otho, and Vitellius flit across the stage of the Empire -amid war and assassinations, so Zachariah and Shallum are swept away by -"dagger-thrusts through the purple." Was there a third? Ewald and others -think that they detect a shadowy outline of him and of his name in 2 -Kings xv. 10. If so, his name was Kobolam, but we know no more of him -beyond the fact that "he was, and is not." For the sacred annals are but -little concerned with this bloody phantasmagoria of feeble kings, who -ruled amid usurpation, anarchy, hostile attacks from without, and civil -war within. "Israel," said Hosea, "hath cast off the thing that is good: -the enemy shall pursue him. They have set up kings, but not by Me: they -have made princes, and I knew it not." "They are all as hot as an oven, -and have devoured their judges; all their kings have fallen; there is -none among them that calleth upon Me."[358] - -It was perhaps during this distracted epoch that for one moment there -was an attempt to place the ruling authority of the nation in the -hands of the prophet himself. So it would appear from Zech. xi. 7-14. -Of course these chapters may be allegorical throughout, as, in any -case, they are in great part. But if so, it becomes more difficult to -understand the meaning. What the prophet says is as follows:-- - -First, as though he saw the terrible conflagration of the Assyrian -tyranny rolling southwards, and felt it to be irresistible, he bids -Lebanon open her doors, that the fire may devour her cedars. There is -perhaps an allusion to the death of Jeroboam II. in the words, "Howl -fir tree, for the cedar is fallen." He sees in vision the forces of -devastation raging among the oaks of Bashan, the forest and the -vintage, while the shepherds cry, and the ousted lions roar in vain. -Then Jehovah bids him feed "the flock of the slaughter"--the flock -sold remorselessly by its rich possessors, and slain, and left -unpitied, as the people were despoiled by its nobles and its kings. -The prophet undertakes the charge of the miserable flock, and takes -two staves, one of which he calls "Prosperity," and the other "Union." -While he was thus engaged three shepherds were cut off in one -month,[359] whom he loathed, and who abhorred him. But he finds his -task hopeless, and flings it up; and in sign that his covenant with -the people is broken, he breaks his staff "Prosperity." The nation -refused to pay him anything for his services, except a paltry sum of -thirty pieces of silver, and these he disdainfully flung into the -sacred treasury.[360] Then seeing that all hope of union between -Israel and Judah was at an end, he broke his staff "Union." Lastly, -Jehovah says He will raise up a foolish, neglectful, cruel shepherd -who would care for nothing but to eat the flesh of the fat and break -the hoofs of the flock. And as for this worthless shepherd, the sword -should be upon his arm and in his right eye; his arm shall be dried -up, and his right eye utterly darkened. - -By this cruel and self-seeking shepherd is probably meant Menahem. He -had been, according to Josephus, the captain of the guard, and was -living at Tirzah, the old beautiful capital of the land. From Tirzah, -where he occupied the position of the captain of the chariots, he -marched on the ill-supported Shallum. Samaria apparently offered no -protection to the usurper. Menahem defeated him and put him to death. -Then he proceeded to enforce the allegiance of the rest of the -country. An otherwise unknown town of the name of Tiphsach[361] -ventured to resist him. Menahem conquered it, and perhaps thinking, as -Machiavelli thought, that princes had better exhibit their utmost -cruelty at first, to deter any further opposition, he let loose his -ferocity on the town in a way which created a shuddering remembrance. -As though he had been one of the ferocious heathen, who had never been -restrained by the knowledge of God, he exhibited the extreme of -callous brutality by ripping up all the women that were with -child.[362] In this he followed the remorseless example of Hazael. -Hosea had prophesied that this should be the fate of Samaria;[363] -Amos had denounced the Ammonites for acting thus in the cities of -Gilead;[364] Shalmaneser III. had, in B.C. 732, thus avenged himself -on the resistance of Beth-Arbel,[365] and Assyria was ultimately to -meet an analogous retribution,[366] as also was Babylon.[367] But that -a king of Ephraim, of God's chosen people, should act thus to his own -brethren was a horrible portent, ominous of swift destruction. - -And the vengeance came. Menahem reigned, at least in name, for ten -years; for the sword which had slain mothers with their unborn infants -reduced the stricken people to terrified silence. But at this epoch -Assyria woke once more from her lethargy, and became the scourge of God -to the guilty people and their guiltier kings. For a whole century the -Assyrians had either been governed by kings who had abjured the lust of -blood and conquest, or had been too seriously occupied on their own -eastern and northern frontiers to intermeddle with the southern -kingdoms, or break down the barriers erected by the confederacy of -Hamath and Damascus between Nineveh and the weaker principalities of -Palestine. But now (B.C. 745) there came to the throne a king who, in -Chaldæa, was known by the name of Pul, and in Assyria by the name of -Tiglath-Pileser;[368] and being too formidable for any power to stay his -path, he marched against Menahem. Already he was lord of the world from -the Caspian to the Gulf of Persia; already he had subdued Babylonia, -Elam, Media, Armenia, eastward--Mesopotamia and Syria westward. Who was -Menahem, the petty usurper of a tenth-rate kingdom, that he should -withstand his power or even retard his advance? - -The cruel usurper was in no condition to resist him. The brand of Cain -was on him and his kingdom. How could the weak, impoverished, harassed -troops of Israel stand up in battle against those numberless serried -ranks, or withstand their tremendous discipline? If the very name of -Persia once struck terror into the brave Greeks before the spell of -Persian ascendency was broken at Marathon, Thermopylæ, and Salamis, -much more did the name of Assyria make the hearts of the wretched -Israelites melt like water. They now for the first time saw those -bearded warriors with their broad swords, their tremendous bows, their -fierce, sensual faces, their thickset figures. In the language of the -prophets we still hear the echo of the fears which they excited by -their swift, unfaltering marches, their sleepless vigilance, their -girded loins, stout sandals, and barbed arrows.[369] - -"Their horses' hoofs," says Isaiah, "shall be like flint, and their -wheels like a whirlwind: their roaring shall be like a lion, they -shall roar like young lions; yea, they shall roar, and lay hold of the -prey, and carry it away safe, and there shall be none to deliver. And -they shall roar against them in that day like the roaring of the sea; -and if one look unto the land, behold darkness and distress, and the -light is darkened in the clouds thereof." - -Ancient Assyria lay beneath the Snowy Mountains of Kurdistan; and its -capital, Nineveh--near Mosul, Kouyunjik, and Neby-Junus--lay six -hundred miles from the Gulf of Persia. The people spoke, as their -descendants still speak, a dialect of Syriac, akin both grammatically -and structurally to Hebrew. Assyria was constantly at war with -Babylonia; but for the most part the kings of Assyria held Babylon in -subjection, and Tiglath-Pileser was a king of the Chaldæans under the -name Pul, as well as a king of Nineveh. - -Menahem was warrior enough to know how hopeless it was to struggle -against these trained forces. He was not even secure on his own -throne. He thought it best to offer himself without resistance as a -feudatory, if the Assyrian King would confirm his sovereignty. -Tiglath-Pileser did not think Menahem worth more trouble, and was -graciously pleased to accept by way of bribe a tribute of a thousand -talents of silver, or about £125,000. This, however, as we learn from -the _Eponym Canon_, was not all. Menahem had to pay a further tribute -year by year. Later on, in 738, Shalmaneser mentions Minik-himmi -(Menahem), as well as Rasunnu (Rezin), among his tributaries. - -The Assyrian withdrew, and Menahem had to exact this vast sum of money -from his miserable subjects. To tax the poor was hopeless. He found that -there were some sixty thousand persons who might be reckoned among the -wealthier farmers and proprietors,[370] and from them he at once exacted -fifty shekels of silver (more than £3) apiece. Probably they thought -that to pay the sum demanded was not too heavy a price for the -retirement of these frightful Assyrians, whose forces Tiglath-Pileser -did not withdraw until he had the money in hand. The event took place in -738, and Tiglath-Pileser continued to reign till 727. How bitterly the -burden of foreign tribute was felt appears from Hos. viii. 9, 10, which -should perhaps be rendered, "They are gone up to Assyria like a wild ass -alone by himself. Ephraim hath hired lovers. And they begin to be -minished by reason of the burden of the king of princes." "The king of -princes" was the haughty title usurped by Tiglath-Pileser, who said, -"Are not my princes all of them kings?" (Isa. x. 8). - -All this was a fulfilment of what Hosea had foreseen:-- - -"Ephraim is oppressed, he is crushed in judgment, because he was content -to walk after vanity. Therefore am I unto Ephraim as a moth, and to the -house of Judah as rottenness. When Ephraim saw his sickness, and the -house of Judah his wound, then went Ephraim to Assyria, and sent unto an -avenging king:[371] yet could he not heal you, nor cure you of your -wound. For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion, and as a young lion to the -House of Judah: I, even I, will tear and go away; I will take away, and -none shall rescue him." The Assyrian was irresistible, because he was -the destined instrument of the wrath of God. The "mixing with the -heathens" was a sin, and Israel in cooing to Assyria was like a foolish -dove; but the day sometimes comes to doomed nations when no course can -save them from the fate which they have provoked.[372] - -Not long afterwards Menahem died, and he had sufficiently established -his rule to be succeeded as a matter of course by his son Pekahiah. But - - "Revenge and wrong bring forth their kind; - The foul cubs like their parents are." - -Samaria had fearful object-lessons in the apparently immediate success -of murder and rebellion. The prize looked near and splendid: the -vengeance might be belated or might not come. Of Pekahiah we are told -absolutely nothing but that he reigned two years, with this -stereotyped addition, that "he did that which was evil in the sight of -Jehovah" by continuing the calf-worship.[373] After this brief and -uneventful reign, his captain Pekah got together fifty fierce -Gileadites, and with the aid of two otherwise unknown friends, Argob -and Arieh, murdered Pekahiah in his own harem.[374] Argob was probably -so named from the district in Bashan, and Arieh was a fit name for a -lion-faced Gadite (1 Chron. xii. 8). - -The sacred historian troubles himself but little about these kings. -His annals of them are brief to extreme meagreness. Like the prophet, -he viewed them as God-abandoned phantoms of guilty royalty. - - "They that cry unto me, My God, we, Israel, know thee. - Israel hath cast off that which is good: - The enemy shall pursue him. - They have set up kings, but not by Me; - They have removed them, and I knew it not: - Of their silver and their gold have they made them idols, - That they may be cut off. - He hath cast on thy calf, O Samaria." - -Probably Pekahiah was, as so often happens, the weak son of a -vigorous father. The times could not tolerate incapable sovereigns; -and the fact that Pekah not only maintained himself on the throne for -twenty years,[375] but was able to take active steps of aggression -against Jerusalem, seems to show that he was a man of some -administrative capacity. If he had not achieved political and military -importance, it would hardly have been worth while for a fierce and -powerful king like Rezin, the last king of Syria, to form so close an -alliance with him. Probably Rezin saw that his throne and his very -existence were in danger, and Pekah wished with Rezin's aid to resist -to the uttermost the encroachments of Assyria, and escape the -burdensome tribute which Menahem had paid. Indeed, it may well be that -Pekahiah's passive continuance of this tribute may have been -distasteful to the people of the land, and that they condoned or even -tacitly aided Pekah's rebellion in order to get rid of it, and to find -protection in an abler monarch. It was the last, perhaps the only, -chance for the kings of Syria and of Israel. As we hear no more of -Hamath as a member of the alliance, we must suppose that it had now -been reduced to impotence and vassalage by the all-powerful Assyrian. -If, however, there was to be any overbalance to the colossal menace -of Nineveh, it could only be by a large confederacy; and it may have -been the refusal of Jotham to join that confederacy, on the death of -his father Uzziah, which caused the joint invasion of Rezin and Pekah -to force him to accept their alliance or to suppress him altogether. -In that case they might have formed a close alliance with Egypt, and -the forces of the united South might, they fancied, prove to be a -match for the forces of the North.[376] - -Whatever designs they may have formed against Jotham, or to whatever -extent they may have annoyed him, it was not till the reign of his son -Ahaz that they became formidable and ruinous. Of this we shall say -more in recounting the reign of Ahaz. All that we need now remark is -that their bold aggression on Judah became the cause of utter -destruction to them both. They advanced against Ahaz, and overran his -helpless country. It was their object to depose the descendant of -David, and to crown in his place a certain unnamed "son of _Tabeal_," -whom Ewald supposed to have been a Syrian, but whose name may possibly -furnish a specimen of the later Jewish device of Gematria.[377] - -It is not impossible that behind these events we may find the efforts -and yearnings of a party which cared more for Israel's unity than for -David's throne. Such a party may easily have sprung up during the -splendid, prosperous reign of Jeroboam II. It has been conjectured by -some that the election of Uzziah by the people--delayed, according to -one reckoning, for twelve years--was in reality the triumph of the party -which felt an unquenchable allegiance to David's house. In Deut. -xxxiii. Reuben is put before Judah; Jeshurun (_i.e._, Israel) is -magnified far more than Judah; and some Northern shrine in Zebulon, as -well as the Temple, is celebrated as a sanctuary.[378] That there were -men in Jerusalem who preferred Rezin and Pekahiah to their own king is -clearly stated in Isaiah. He compares them to those who prefer a turbid -torrent to a soft, sweet stream. "Because," he says, "this people -despise the waters of Shiloah that flow softly, and take delight in -Rezin and Remaliah's son; now, therefore, the Lord bringeth upon them -the waters of the river, strong and many, even the King of Assyria, and -all his glory."[379] Isaiah seems to have had a contempt for the whole -attack. He told Ahaz not to fear for the stumps of those two smoking -firebrands Rezin, King of Syria, and the Israelitish usurper, whom he -only condescends to call "Remaliah's son." He promises the trembling -Ahaz that, since he had faithlessly _refused_ a sign, God would give him -a sign. The sign was that the young woman who accompanied -Isaiah--perhaps his youthful wife--should bear a son, whose name should -be called Immanuel; and that before the child Immanuel--whose -designation, "God with us," was an omen of the loftiest hope--should be -of an age to distinguish evil from good, the Northern land, which Ahaz -abhorred, should be forsaken of both her kings. - -The prophecy came true in every particular. Rezin and Pekah swept all -before them, and besieged Jerusalem; but they wasted their time in -vain before the fortifications which Jotham had strengthened and -repaired. Obliged to raise the siege, Rezin carried his army -southward, and indemnified himself by seizing Elath, by driving out -the Judæan garrison, and replacing them with Syrians.[380] It was the -last gleam of Syrian success, before the final overthrow of Damascus -which prophecy had often and emphatically foretold. - -Pekah also withdrew his forces--no doubt compelled to do so by the -step which Ahaz took in his desperation. For now the King of Judah -invoked the protection and invited the active interference of -Tiglath-Pileser against his enemies--"to save him out of the hand of -the King of Syria, and out of the hand of the King of Israel, who were -risen up against him." - -Rezin and Damascus first felt the might of the Assyrian's conquering -arm. The account of his decisive conquest is preserved in the _Eponym -Canon_, and the passages which refer to the defeat of the Syrians will -be found in the First Appendix at the end of the volume. It appears -from the monuments that Rezin (Rasannu) lost not only his kingdom, but -his life. - -It is the death-knell of Aramæan greatness, as Amos had foretold. - - "Thus saith Jehovah: - For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four, - I will not turn away the punishment thereof; - Because they have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron: - But I will send a fire into the house of Hazael, - Which shall devour the palaces of Benhadad. - And I will break the bar of Damascus,[381] - And cut off him that sitteth [on the throne] in the Valley of - Aven,[382] - And him that holdeth the sceptre from Beth-Eden:[383] - And the people of Syria shall go into captivity unto Kir,[384] - Saith Jehovah." - -Rezin was slain--how we know not; very probably by one of the horrible -methods of torture--by being flayed alive, or decapitated, or having -his lips and nose cut off--which were practised by these demon-kings -of Nineveh. - -Nor did Pekah escape. Tiglath-Pileser advanced against the northern part -of his dominions, and afflicted the land of Zebulon and Naphtali. Ijon; -Abel-beth-Maachah, the city of Elisha; Zanoah, the ancient sanctuary of -Kedesh-Naphtali, the home of the hero Barak; Hazor, the former capital -of the Canaanitish king Jabin; Gilead; Galilee,--all submitted to him, -apparently without striking a serious blow. He dealt with the miserable -inhabitants in the way familiar to kings of Assyria. He deported them -_en masse_ into a strange country of which they did not understand the -language, and in which they were reduced to hopeless subjection, while -he supplied their places by aliens from various parts of his own -dominions. There could be no securer method of reducing to paralysis all -their national aspirations. Strangers in a strange land, they forgot -their nationality, forgot their religion, forgot their language, forgot -their traditions. Their sole resource was to plunge into material -pursuits, and to melt away into indistinguishable obliteration among -the neighbouring heathen. It was the beginning of the Northern -Captivity--of the loss of the Ten Tribes. - -As Tiglath-Pileser thus permanently subdued and depopulated the land -of the Northern Tribes, it is a Jewish tradition that at this time he -carried away the golden "calf" from Dan among his spoils.[385] -Scripture does not record the fact, though in Hosea (viii. 5) there -may be an allusion to the fate of that at Bethel, whether the right -version be "He hath cast off thy calf, O Samaria," or "Thy calf, O -Samaria, hath cast thee off."[386] "The workman made it," he -continues; "therefore it is not God: for the calf of Samaria shall be -broken in pieces." And again (x. 5): "The people of Samaria shall fear -because of the heifer of the House of Vanity: for the people thereof -shall mourn over it, and the _chemarim_ [_i.e._, the black-robed false -priests thereof] shall tremble for it, for the glory thereof, because -it is departed. It [the idol] shall also be carried to Assyria for a -present to King Combat." - -For a time Pekah escaped; but unsuccess is fatal to a murderous usurper, -weakened by the loss and plunder of dominions which he is unable to -defend. Instead of wasting time in the siege of a strong city like -Samaria, Tiglath-Pileser in all probability stirred up Hoshea, the son -of Elah, to rise in conspiracy against his master and slay him. For -Pekah and Israel seem to have made light of the Northern raid. They said -in their pride and stoutness of heart, "The bricks are fallen down, but -we will build with new stones: the sycomores are cut down, but we will -change them into cedars." Such pretence of security was ill-timed and -senseless, and Isaiah denounced it. "Therefore," he said, "Jehovah hath -set up against Israel the adversaries of Rezin [_i.e._, the Assyrians], -and hath stirred up his enemies; the Syrians on the east, and the -Philistines on the west; and they have devoured Israel with open mouth. -For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out -still. Yet the people have not turned unto Him that smote them, neither -have they sought the Lord of hosts. Therefore Jehovah hath cut off from -Israel palm-branch and rush in one day. The elder and the honourable -man, he is the head; and the prophet that speaketh lies, he is the tail. -For they that lead this people cause them to err, and they that are led -of them are swallowed up."[387] - -The following verses furnish one of the numerous pictures of the anarchy -and abounding misery of these evil days. "For wickedness burneth as the -fire: it devoureth the briers and thorns; yea, it kindleth in the -thickets of the forest, and they roll upwards in thick clouds of smoke. -Through the wrath of the Lord of hosts is the land burnt up; the people -also are the fuel of fire: _no man spareth his brother_. And one shall -snatch on the right, and be hungry; and he shall eat on the left hand, -and they shall not be satisfied: they shall _eat every man the flesh of -his own arm_: Manasseh, Ephraim; and Ephraim, Manasseh: and they -together shall be against Judah. For all this His anger is not turned -away, but His hand is stretched out still." - -We are told in the Book of Kings that Pekah reigned for twenty years; -but some of these later reigns must be shortened to suit the -exigencies of known chronological data. It seems probable that he -occupied the throne for a much shorter time.[388] - -Such was the weakened, harassed, vassal kingdom--the gaunt spectre of -itself--to the throne of which, after a period of anarchy and chaos, -Hoshea, by conspiracy and murder, succeeded as the miserable feudatory -of Assyria. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[354] Amos viii. 2. - -[355] Amos iv. 1-3. - -[356] It is probable that our present Book of Zechariah is composed of -the works of three prophets of different dates, each of whom may have -borne that name. See my _Minor Prophets_ ("Men of the Bible" Series). - -[357] Zech. xi. 8. In 2 Kings xv. 10 the LXX. read καὶ επάταξεν αὐτὸν -ἐν κεβλαάμ; and Ewald thinks that "before the people" (קָבָל־צָם) is -really a proper name of the third king in one month--"and _Kobolam_ -slew him." There is insufficient ground for this; though a similar -name is found in Assyrian records. - -[358] Hos. viii. 3, vii. 7. - -[359] Zachariah, Shallum, Kobolam (?). - -[360] Zech. xi. 1-17 (Heb. 13). - -[361] That this was Thapsacus on the Euphrates (1 Kings iv. 24), and -that Menahem was in a position to march northward three hundred miles, -and offer so deadly and wanton an insult to the might of Assyria, is -out of the question. The name means "a ford," and might apply to any -town on a river. Thenius thinks the name is a clerical error for -_Tappuach_, between Ephraim and Manasseh (Josh. xvii. 7, 8). - -[362] Josephus says, ὠμότητος ὑπερβολὴν οὐ καταλιπὼν οὐδὲ ἀγριότητος. -It is said that the same crime was committed in 1861 by a Mexican -bandit. Machiavelli says, "He who violently and without just right -usurps a crown must use cruelty, if cruelty becomes necessary, once -for all" (_De princ._, 8). - -[363] 2 Kings viii. 12; Hos. xiii. 16. - -[364] Amos i. 13. - -[365] Hos. x. 14. This allusion is, however, uncertain. Shalmaneser III. -is not elsewhere found abbreviated into Shalman. Some suppose him to be -a Moabitish king, Salamannu, who was a vassal of Tiglath-Pileser. The -LXX., Vulg., etc., identify him with the Zalmunna of Judg. viii. 18. -Psalm lxxxiii. 11 renders the word _ex domo ejus qui judicavit Baal_ -(_i.e._, Gideon). Beth-Arbel is either Arbela in Galilee, or Irbid, -north-east of Pella. - -[366] Nah. iii. 10. - -[367] Isa. xiii. 16. - -[368] The two predecessors of Tiglath-Pileser (_Tuklat-abal-isarra_) -were Assurdayan and Assurnirari. - -[369] Isa. v. 26-29. - -[370] Comp. Job xx. 15; Ruth ii. 1. - -[371] Hos. v. 11-13. Comp. x. 6: "It [Samaria] shall be carried to -Assyria for a present unto King Jareb." Sayce (_Bab. and Orient. -Records_, December 1887) thinks that Jareb may have been the original -name of Sargon, and so too Neubauer, _Zeitschr. für Assyr._, 1886. The -Vulg. renders King Jareb _ad regem ultorem_, and so too Symmachus. -Aquila and Theodotion have δικαζόμενον. It may be the name of an -unknown king of Assyria, or of Pul, or of Sargon--R.V., margin, "a -king that should contend." - -[372] Hos. vii. 8-12. - -[373] Josephus says, τῇ τοῦ πατρὸς ἀκολουθήσας ὠμότητι. - -[374] 2 Kings xv. 25, A.V., "in the palace of the king's house" -(_armon_), rather "fortress." For the character of the Gileadites see -1 Chron. xii. 8, xxvi. 31. - -[375] The length of Pekah's reign is most doubtful. If the periods -assigned to the reigns in the Northern and Southern Kingdoms be added -together up to the Fall of Samaria in the sixth year of Hezekiah (2 -Kings xviii. 9, 10), it will be found that the Southern chronology is -twenty years longer than the Northern. G. Smith would alter the text, -and make Jeroboam II. reign fifty-one years and Pekah thirty years; -others invent an interregnum of eleven years between Jeroboam II. and -Zachariah, and an anarchy of nine years before Hoshea's accession; -others shorten Pekah's reign to _one_ year. - -[376] 2 Kings xv. 37. - -[377] Vide _infra_. - -[378] Deut. xxxiii. 19: "They [Zebulon] shall call the peoples unto -the mountain: there shall they offer the sacrifices of righteousness." - -[379] Isa. viii. 6, 7. - -[380] Perhaps we should read Edomites (2 Kings xvi. 6). - -[381] The bar of its city gate. - -[382] Bikath-Aven--"The cleft of Aven"--Cœle Syria, or Hollow Syria, -still called by the Arabs El-Bukāa. Comp. Josh. xi. 17, xii. 7. Aven--or -"Vanity"--is perhaps Heliopolis or Baalbek. Comp. Ezek. xxx. 17. - -[383] Perhaps Beit el Jame, "House of Paradise"--about eight hours -from Damascus (Porter, _Five Years in Syria_, i. 313). - -[384] Kir, in Armenia--the land of their origin (Amos ix. 7). - -[385] But, after all, was there a golden calf at Dan? It is scarcely -ever alluded to, and the notion that there was one may have arisen (1) -from a corruption or mistaken rendering of the text in 1 Kings xii. -29, and (2) from the existence there of the idolatrous ephod. See -Klostermann, _ad loc._; Isa. ix. 8-17. - -[386] LXX., Ἀποτρίψαι τὸν μόσχον σοῦ, Σαμάρεια; Vulg., _Projectus est -vitulus tuus, Samaria_. Orelli renders it, "Abscheulich ist dein Kalb, -O Samaria." In Jer. xlvi. 15 we read (of Egypt), "Why is thy strong -one swept away?" where the true reading may be, "Hath Khaph [_i.e._, -Apis], thy chosen one, fled?" LXX., Ἆπις ὁ μόσχος σοῦ, ὁ ἐκλεκτός. So -Amos had prophesied that the "god of Dan" and the "way of Beersheba" -should fall for evermore (Amos viii. 14). - -[387] Isa. ix. 11-16. With this passage comp. 2 Kings xxiii. 5; Zeph. -i. 4; Hos. vii. 9, 10. - -[388] Tiglath-Pileser says: "Pakaha, their king, I killed: Ausi -[Hoshea] I placed over them. The distant land of Bit-Khumri [the -"house of Omri"]--_the whole of its inhabitants_, with their goods--I -carried away to Asshur" (B.C. 734). In this year he mentions Ahaz -among his tributaries. - - - - - CHAPTER XXI - - _HOSHEA, AND THE FALL OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM_ - - B.C. 734-725 - - 2 KINGS xvii. 1-41 - - "As for Samaria, her king is cut off as the foam upon the - water."--HOS. x. 7. - - -As a matter of convenience, we follow our English Bible in calling the -prophet by the name Ho_sea_, and the nineteenth, last, and best king -of Israel Ho_shea_. The names, however, are identical (הֹושֵׁצַ), and -mean "Salvation"--the name borne by Joshua also in his earlier days. -In the irony of history the name of the last king of Ephraim was thus -identical with that of her earliest and greatest hero, just as the -last of Roman emperors bore the double name of the Founder of Rome and -the Founder of the Empire--Romulus Augustulus. By a yet deeper irony -of events the king in whose reign came the final precipitation of ruin -wore the name which signified deliverance from it. - -And more and more, as time went on, the prophet Hosea felt that he had -no word of present hope or comfort for the king his namesake. It was -the more brilliant lot of Isaiah, in the Southern Kingdom, to kindle -the ardour of a generous courage. Like Tyrtæus, who roused the -Spartans to feel their own greatness--like Demosthenes, who hurled -the might of Athens against Philip of Macedon--like Chatham, "bidding -England be of good cheer, and hurl defiance at her foes"--like Pitt, -pouring forth, in the days of the Napoleonic terror, "the indomitable -language of courage and of hope,"--Isaiah was missioned to encourage -Judah to despise first the mighty Syrian, and then the mightier -Assyrian. Far different was the lot of Hosea, who could only be the -denouncer of an inevitable doom. His sad function was like that of -Phocion after Chæroneia, of Hannibal after Zama, of Thiers after -Sedan: he had to utter the Cassandra-voices of prophecy, which his -besotted and demented contemporaries--among whom the priests were the -worst of all[389]--despised and flouted until the time for repentance -had gone by for ever. - -True it is that Hosea could not be content--what true heart could?--to -breathe nothing but the language of reprobation and despair. Israel -had been "yoked to his two transgressions,"[390] but Jehovah could not -give up His love for His chosen people:-- - - "How shall I give thee up, Ephraim? - How shall I surrender thee, Israel? - How shall I make thee as Admah? - How shall I treat thee as Zeboim? - Mine heart is turned within Me; - I am wholly filled with compassion! - I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger; - I will not again destroy Ephraim: - For I am God, and not man. - The Holy One in the midst of thee! - I will not come to exterminate! - They shall come after Jehovah as after a lion that roars! - For he shall roar, and his sons shall come hurrying from the - west, - They shall come hurrying as a bird out of Egypt, - And as a dove out of the land of Assyria; - And I will cause them to dwell in their houses, Saith - Jehovah."[391] - -Alas! the gleam of alleviation was imaginary rather than actual. The -prophet's wish was father to his thought. He had prophesied that -Israel should be scattered in all lands (ix. 3, 12, 17, xiii. 3-16). -This was true; and it did not prove true, except in some higher ideal -sense, that "Israel shall again dwell in his own land" (xiv. 4-7) in -prosperity and joy. - -The date of Hoshea's accession is uncertain, and we cannot tell in -what sense we are to understand his reign as having lasted "nine -years."[392] We have no grounds for accepting the statement of -Josephus (_Antt._, IX. xiii. 1), that Hoshea had been a friend of -Pekah and plotted against him. Tiglath-Pileser expressly says that he -himself slew Pekah and appointed Hoshea.[393] His must have been, at -the best, a pitiful and humiliating reign. He owed his purely vassal -sovereignty to Assyrian patronage. He probably did as well for Israel -as was in his power. Singular to relate, he is the only one of all the -kings of Israel of whom the historian has a word of commendation; for -while we are told that "he did that which was evil in the sight of -the Lord," it is added that it was "not as the kings of Israel that -were before him." But we do not know wherein either his evil-doing or -his superiority consisted. The Rabbis guess that he did not replace -the golden calf at Dan which Tiglath-Pileser had taken away (Hos. x. -6); or that he did not prevent his subjects from going to Hezekiah's -passover.[394] "It seems like a harsh jest," says Ewald, "that this -Hoshea, who was better than all his predecessors, was to be the last -king." But so it has often been in history. The vengeance of the -French Revolution smote the innocent and harmless Louis XVI. and Marie -Antoinette--not Louis XIV., or Louis XV. and Madame du Pompadour. - -His patron Tiglath-Pileser ended his magnificent reign of conquest in -727, soon after he had seated Hoshea on the throne. The removal of his -strong grasp on the helm caused immediate revolt. Phœnicia especially -asserted her independence against Shalmaneser IV. He seems to have -spent five years in an unavailing attempt to capture Island-Tyre. -Meanwhile, the internal troubles which had harassed and weakened Egypt -ceased, and a strong Ethiopian king named Sabaco established his rule -over the whole country.[395] It was perhaps the hope that Phœnicia -might hold out against the Assyrian, and that the Egyptian might -protect Samaria, which kindled in the mind of Hoshea the delusive plan -of freeing himself and his impoverished land from the grinding tribute -imposed by Nineveh. While Shalmaneser[396] was trying to quell Tyre, -Hoshea, having received promises of assistance from Sabaco, withheld -the "presents"--the _minchah_, as the tribute is euphemistically -called--which he had hitherto paid. Seeing the danger of a powerful -coalition, Shalmaneser swept down on Samaria in 724. Possibly he -defeated the army of Israel in the plain of Jezreel (Hos. i. 5), and -got hold of the person of Hoshea. Josephus says that he "besieged -him"; but the sacred historian only tells us that "he shut him up, and -bound him in prison." Whether Hoshea was taken in battle, or betrayed -by the Assyrian party in Samaria, or whether he went in person to see -if he could pacify the ruthless conqueror, he henceforth disappears -from history "like foam"--or like a chip or a bubble--"upon the -water." We do not know whether he was put to death, but we infer from -an allusion in Micah that he was subjected to the cruel indignities in -which the Assyrians delighted; for the prophet says, "They shall smite -the Judge of Israel with a rod upon the cheek."[397] Perhaps in the -title "Judge" (Shophet, _suffes_) we may see a sign that Hoshea's -royalty was little more than the shadow of a name. - -Having thus got rid of the king, Shalmaneser proceeded to invest the -capital. But Samaria was strongly fortified upon its hill, and the -Jewish race has again and again shown--as it showed so conspicuously -in the final crisis of its destiny, when Jerusalem defied the terrible -armies of Rome--that with walls to protect them they could pluck up a -terrible courage and endurance from despair. Strong as Assyria was, -the capital of Ephraim for three years resisted her beleaguering host -and her crashing battering-rams. About all the anguish which prevailed -within the city, and the wild vicissitudes of orgy and starvation, -history is silent. But prophecy tells us that the sorrows of a -travailing woman came upon the now kingless city. They drank to the -dregs the cup of fury.[398] The saddest Northern prophet, "the -Jeremiah of Israel," sings the dirge of Israel's saddest king.[399] - - "I am become to them as a lion; - As a leopard will I watch by the way; - I will meet them as a bear bereaved of her whelps, - And rend the caul of their heart, - And there will I devour them like a lioness: - The beast of the field shall tear them.... - Where now is thy king, that he may save thee in all thy cities - And thy judges, of whom thou saidst, 'Give me a king and - prince'? - I give thee a king in Mine anger, - And take him away in My wrath." - -For three years Samaria held out. During the siege Shalmaneser died, -and was succeeded by Sargon, who--though he vaguely talks of "the -kings his ancestors," and says that he had been preceded by three -hundred and thirty Assyrian dynasts--never names his father, and seems -to have been a usurping general.[400] - -Sabaco remained inactive, and basely deserted the miserable people -which had relied on his protection. In this conduct Egypt was true to -its historic character of untrustworthiness and inertness. Both in -Israel and in Judah there were two political parties. One relied on -the strength of Egypt; the other counselled submission to Assyria, -or--in the hour when it became necessary to defy Assyria--confidence -in God. Egypt was as frail a support as one of her own paper-reeds, -which bent under the weight, and broke and ran into the hand of every -one who leaned on it. - -Sargon did not raze the city, and we see from the _Eponym Canon_ that -its inhabitants were still strong enough some years later to take part -in a futile revolt. But we have one dreadful glimpse of the horrors -which he inflicted upon it. They were the inevitable punishment of -every conquered city which had dared to resist the Assyrian arm. - - "Samaria shall bear her guilt, - For she hath rebelled against her God. - They shall fall by the sword: - Their infants shall be dashed in pieces, - And their women in child shall be ripped up."[401] - -Sargon's own record of the matter on the tablets at Khorsabad is: "I -besieged, took, and occupied the city of Samaria, and carried into -captivity twenty-seven thousand two hundred and eighty of its -inhabitants. I changed the former government of this country, and -placed over it lieutenants of my own. And Sebeh, Sultan of Egypt, came -to Raphia to fight against me. They met me, and I routed them. Sebeh -fled."[402] The Assyrians were occupied in the unsuccessful siege of -Tyre between 720-715, during which years Sargon put down Yahubid of -Hamath, whose revolt had been aided by Damascus and Samaria. In 710 he -marched against Ashdod (Isa. xx. 1). In 709 he defeated -Merodach-Baladan at Dur-Yakin, and reconquered Chaldæa, deporting some -of the population into Samaria. In 704, in the fifteenth year of his -reign, he was assassinated, after a career of victory. He inscribes on -his palace at Khorsabad a prayer to his god Assur, that, after his -toils and conquests, "I may be preserved for the long years of a long -life, for the happiness of my body, for the satisfaction of my heart. -May I accumulate in this palace immense treasures, the booties of all -countries, the products of mountains and valleys." Assur and the gods -of Chaldæa were invoked in vain; the prayer was scattered to the -winds, and the murderer's dagger was the comment on Sargon's happy -anticipations of peace and splendour. - -Israel fell unpitied by her southern neighbour, for Judah was still -smarting under memories of the old contempt and injury of Joash -ben-Jehoahaz, and the more recent wrongs inflicted by Pekah and Rezin. -Isaiah exults over the fate of Samaria, while he points the moral of her -fall to the drunken priests and prophets of Jerusalem. "Woe," he says, -"to the crown of pride of the drunkards of Ephraim, and to the fading -flower of his glorious beauty, which is on the head of the fat valley of -them that are smitten down with wine! Behold, the Lord hath a mighty and -strong one [_i.e._, the Assyrian]; as a tempest of hail, a destroying -storm, as a tempest of mighty water overflowing, shall he cast down to -the earth with violence. The crown of pride, the drunkards of Ephraim, -shall be trodden underfoot: and the fading flower of his glorious -beauty, which is on the head of the fat valley, shall be as the first -ripe fig before the summer; which when he that looketh upon it seeth, -while it is yet in his hand he eateth it up."[403] Israel had begun in -hostility to Judah, and perished by it at last. - -Such, then, was the end of the once brilliant kingdom of Israel--the -kingdom which, even so late as the reign of Jeroboam II., seemed to -have a great future before it. No one could have foreseen beforehand -that, when, with the prophetic encouragement of Ahijah, Jeroboam I. -established his sovereignty over the greater, richer, and more -flourishing part of the land assigned to the sons of Jacob, the new -kingdom should fall into utter ruin and destruction after only two and -a half centuries of existence, and its tribes melt away amid the -surrounding nations, and sink into a mixed and semi-heathen race -without any further nationality or distinctive history. It seemed far -less probable that the mere fragment of the Southern Kingdom, after -retaining its separate existence for more than one hundred and sixty -years longer than its more powerful brother, should continue to endure -as a nation till the end of time. Such was the design of God's -providence, and we know no more. The Northern Kingdom had, up to this -time, produced the greatest and most numerous prophets--Ahijah, -Elijah, Elisha, Micaiah, Jonah, Amos, Hosea, Nahum, and many -more.[404] It had also produced the loveliest and most enduring poetry -in the Song of Songs, the Song of Deborah, and other contributions to -the Books of Jashar, and of the Wars of Jehovah. It had also brought -into vigour the earliest and best historic literature, the narratives -of the Elohist and the Jehovist. These immortal legacies of the -religious spirit of the Northern Kingdom were incomparably superior in -moral and enduring value to the Levitic jejuneness of the Priestly -Code, with its hierarchic interests and ineffectual rules, which, in -the exaggerated supremacy attached to rites, proved to be the final -blight of an unspiritual Judaism. Israel had also been superior in -prowess and in deeds of war, and in the days of Joash ben-Jehoahaz -ben-Jehu had barely conceded to Judah a right to separate existence. -More than all this, the apostasies of Judah, from the days of Solomon -downwards, were quite as heinous as Jezebel's Baal-worship, and far -more deadly than the irregular but not at first idolatrous cultus of -Bethel. The prophets are careful to teach Judah that if she was -spared it was not because of any good deservings.[405] Yet now the -cedar was scathed and smitten down, and its boughs were rent and -scattered; and the thistle had escaped the wild beast's tread! - -In the former volume we glanced at some of the causes of this, and the -blessings which resulted from it. The central and chiefest blessing -was, first, the preservation of a purer form of monotheism, and a -loftier ideal of religion--though only realised by a few in -Judah--than had ever prevailed in the Northern Tribes; secondly, and -above all, the development of that inspiring Messianic prophecy which -was to be fulfilled seven centuries later, when He who was David's Son -and David's Lord came to our lost race from the bosom of the Father, -and brought life and immortality to light. - -And it was the work purely of "God's unseen providence, by men nicknamed -'Chance,'" which, dealing with nations as the potter with his clay, -chooses some to honour and some to dishonour. For, as all the prophets -are anxious to remind the Judæan Kingdom, their success, the -procrastination of their downfall, their restoration from captivity, -were not due to any merits of their own. The Jews were and ever had been -a stiff-necked nation; and though some of their kings had been faithful -servants of Jehovah, yet many of them--like Rehoboam, and Ahaz, and -Manasseh--exceeded in wickedness and inexcusable apostasy the least -faithful of the worshippers at Gilgal and Bethel. They were plainly -reminded of their nothingness: "And thou shalt speak and say before the -Lord thy God, A Syrian ready to perish was my father, and he went down -into Egypt, and sojourned there with a few, and became there a -nation."[406] "Fear not, thou worm Jacob: I will help thee."[407] - -But this was the end of the Ten Tribes. Nor must we say that Hosea's -prediction of mercy was laughed to scorn by the irony of events, when -he had given it as God's promise that-- - - "I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger, - I will not again destroy Israel; - For I am God, and not man."[408] - -The words mean that mercy is God's chiefest and most essential -attribute; and, after all, a nation is composed of families and -individuals, and in political extinction there may have been many -families and individuals in Israel, like that of Tobias, and like that -of Anna, the prophetess of the tribe of Asher, who found, either in -their far exile, or among the scattered Jews who still peopled the old -territories, a peace which was impossible during the distracted -anarchy and deepening corruption of the whole period which had elapsed -since the founding of the house of Omri. In any case God knows and -loves His own. The words, - - "I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger; - For I am God, and not man," - -might stand for an epitome of much that is most precious in Holy Writ. -God's orthodoxy is the truth; and the truth remaineth, though man's -orthodoxy exercises all its fury and all its baseness to overwhelm it. -What hope has any man, even a St. Paul--what hope had even the Lord -Himself--before the harsh, self-interested tribunals of human -judgment, or of that purely external religionism which has always -shown itself more brutal and more blundering than secular cruelty? -What chance has there been, humanly speaking, for God's best saints, -prophets, and reformers, when priests, popes, or inquisitors have been -their judges? If God resembled those generations of unresisted -ecclesiastics, whose chief resort has been the syllogism of violence, -and whose main arguments have been the torture-chamber and the stake, -what hope could there possibly be for the vast majority of mankind but -those endless torments by the terrors of which corrupt Churches have -forced their tyranny upon the crushed liberties and the paralysed -conscience of mankind? The Indian sage was right who said that "God -can only be truly described by the words No! No!"--that is, by -repudiating multitudes of the ignoble and cruel basenesses which -religious teachers have imagined or invented respecting Him. Because -God is God, and not man--God, not a tyrant or an inquisitor--God, with -the great compassionate heart of unfathomable tenderness,--therefore, -in all who truly love Him, perfect love casteth out fear, because fear -hath torment. Sin means ruin; yet God is love.[409] - - * * * * * - -The historian of the Kings here digresses, in a manner unusual to the -Old Testament, to give us a most interesting glimpse of the fate of -the conquered people, and the origin of the race which was known to -after-ages by the name "Samaritan." - -Sargon, when he had sacked the capital, carried out the policy of -deportation which had now been established by the Assyrian kings. He -achieved the double purpose of populating the capital and province of -Nineveh, while he reduced subject nations to inanition, by sweeping -away all the chief of the inhabitants from conquered states, and -settling them in his own more immediate dominions. There they would be -reduced to impotence, and mingle with the races among whom their lot -would henceforth be cast. He therefore "carried Israel away" into -Assyria, and placed them in Halah, north of Thapsacus, on the -Euphrates, and in Habor, the river of Gozan[410]--_i.e._, on the river -in Northern Assyria which still bears the name of Khabour, and flows -into the Euphrates--and in the cities of the Medes.[411] He replaced -the old population by Dinaites, Tarplites, Apharsathchites, -Susanchites, Elamites, Dehavites, and Babylonians, after carrying away -the great bulk of the better-class population.[412] - -After this the historian pauses to sum up and emphasise once more the -main lesson of his narrative. It is that "righteousness exalteth a -nation, and sin is the reproach of any people." God had called His son -Israel out of Egypt, delivered His chosen from Pharaoh, given them a -pleasant land; but "Israel had sinned against Jehovah their God, and -had feared other gods, and walked in the statutes of the heathen." -They had failed therefore in fulfilling the very purpose for which -they had been set apart. They had been intended "to uplift among the -nations the banner of righteousness" and the banner of the One True -God. Instead of this, they were seduced by the heathen ritual of - - "Gay religions full of pomp and gold." - -They decked out alien institutions,[413] and alike in frequented and -populous places--"from the tower of the watchmen to the fenced -city"--set up _matstseboth_ (A.V., "pillars") and _Asherim_ on every -high hill. The green trees became _obumbratrices scelerum_, the secret -bowers of their iniquities. They burnt incense on the _bamoth_, and -served idols, and wrought wickedness. Useless had been the voices of -all the prophets and the seers. They went after vain things, and -became vain. Beginning with the two "calves," they proceeded to lewd -and orgiastic idolatries. Ahab and Jezebel seduced them into Tyrian -Baal-worship. From the Assyrians they learnt and practised the -adoration of the host of heaven.[414] From Moab and Ammon they -borrowed the abominable rites of Moloch, and used divination and -enchantments by means of belomancy (Ezek. xxi. 21, 22) and necromancy, -and sold themselves to do wickedness. - -Nor was this all. These idolatries, with their guilty ritualism, were -not confined to Israel, but also - - "Infected Zion's daughters with like heat, - Whose wanton passions in the sacred porch - Ezekiel saw, when, by the vision led, - His eye surveyed the dark idolatries - Of alienated Judah." - -And thus, when Jehovah afflicted the seed of Israel and cast them out -of His sight, Judah also had to feel the stroke of retribution.[415] - -And it is idle to object that even if Israel had been faithful she must -have inevitably perished before the superior might of Damascus, or -Nineveh, or Babylon. How can we tell? It is not possible for us thus to -write unwritten history, and there is absolutely nothing to show that -the surmise is correct. In the days of David, of Uzziah, of Jeroboam -II., Judah and Israel had shown what they could achieve. Had they been -strong in faithfulness to Jehovah, and in the righteousness which that -faith required, they would have shown an invincible strength amid the -moral enervation of the surrounding people. They might have held their -own by welding into one strong kingdom the whole of Palestine, including -Philistia, Phœnicia, the Negeb, and the Trans-Jordanic region. They -might have consolidated the sway which they at various times attained -southwards, as far as the Red Sea port of Elath; northwards over Aram -and Damascus, as far as the Hamath on the Orontes; eastwards to -Thapsacus on the Euphrates; westward to the Isles of the Gentiles. -There is nothing improbable, still less impossible, in the view that, if -the Israelites had truly served Jehovah and obeyed His laws, they might -then have permanently established the monarchy which was ideally -regarded as their inheritance, and which for brief and fitful periods -they partially maintained. And such a monarchy, held together by warrior -statesmen, strong and righteous, and above all secure in the blessing of -God, would have been a thoroughly adequate counterpoise, not only to -dilatory and distracted Egypt, which had long ceased to be aggressive, -but even to brutal Assyria, which prevailed in no small measure because -of the isolation and mutual dissension of these southern principalities. - -But, as it was, "Assyria and Egypt--the two world-powers in the dawn -of history, the two chief sources of ancient civilisation, the twin -giant-empires which bounded the Israelite people on the right hand and -on the left--were cruel neighbours, between whom the ill-fated nation -was tossed to and fro in wanton sport like a shuttlecock. They were -cruel friends before whom it must cringe in turns, praying sometimes -for help, suing sometimes for very life--alternate scourges in the -hand of the Divine wrath. Now it is the fly of Egypt, and now it is -the bee of Assyria, whose ruthless swarms issue forth at the word of -Jehovah, settling in the holes of the rocks, and upon all thorns, and -upon all bushes, with deadly sting, fatal to man and beast, -devastating the land far and wide. Holding the poor Israelite in their -relentless embrace, they threatened ever and again to crush him by -their grip. Like the fabled rocks which frowned over the narrow -straits of the Bosporus, they would crash together and annihilate the -helpless craft which the storms of destiny had placed at their mercy. -Israel reeled under their successive blows. As was the beginning, so -was the end. As the captivity of Egypt had been the cradle of the -nation, so was the captivity of Assyria to be its tomb."[416] - -In any case the principle of the historian remains unshaken. Sin is -weakness; idolatry is folly and rebellion; uncleanness is decrepitude. -St. Paul was not thinking of this ancient Philosophy of History when -he wrote his Epistle to the Romans; yet the intense and masterly -sketch which he gives of that moral corruption which brought about the -long, slow, agonising dissolution of the beauty that was Greece, and -the grandeur that was Rome, is one of its strongest justifications. -His view only differs from the summary before us in the power of its -eloquence and the profoundness of its psychologic insight. He says the -same thing as the historian of the Kings, only in words of greater -power and wider reach, when he writes: "For the wrath of God is -revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of -men, who hold down the truth in unrighteousness. Knowing God, they -glorified Him not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in -their reasonings" (ἐματαιώθησαν, the very word used in the LXX. in 2 -Kings xvii. 15), "and their senseless heart was darkened. Professing -themselves to be wise, they became fools" (words which might describe -the expediency-policy of Jeroboam I., and its fatal consequences), -"and changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of an -image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four-footed beasts, and -creeping things. For this cause God gave them up to passions of -dishonour, and unto a reprobate mind, to do those things which are -not fitting, being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, -covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, -malignity,"--and so on, through a long catalogue of iniquities which -are identical with those which we find so burningly denounced on the -pages of the prophets of Israel and Judah. - -Even a Machiavelli, cool and cynical and audacious as was his -scepticism, could see and admit that faithfulness to religion is the -secret of the happiness and prosperity of states.[417] An irreligious -society tends inevitably and always to be a dissolute society; and a -"dissolute society is the most tragic spectacle which history has ever -to present--a nest of disease, of jealousy, of dissensions, of ruin, -and despair, whose last hope is to be washed off the world and -disappear. Such societies must die sooner or later of their own -gangrene, of their own corruption, because the infection of evil, -spreading into unbounded selfishness, ever intensifying and -reproducing passions which defeat their own aim, can never end in -anything but moral dissolution." We need not look further than the -collapse of France after the battle of Sedan, and the cause to which -that collapse was attributed, not only by Christians, but by her own -most worldly and sceptical writers, to see that the same causes ever -issue and will issue in the same ruinous effects. - - * * * * * - -In order to complete the history of the Northern Kingdom, the -historian here anticipates the order of time by telling us what -happened to the mongrel population whom Sargon transplanted into -central Ephraim in place of the old inhabitants. - -The king, we are told, brought them from Babylon--which was at this -time under the rule of Assyria; from Cuthah--by which seems to be -meant some part of Mesopotamia near Babylon;[418] from Avva, or -Ivah--probably the same as Ahavah or Hit, on the Euphrates, north-west -of Babylon; from Sepharvaim, or Sippara, also on the Euphrates;[419] -and from Hamath, on the Orontes, which had not long remained under -Jeroboam II.[420] It must not be supposed that the whole population of -Ephraim was deported; that was a physical impossibility. Although we -are told in Assyrian annals that Sargon carried away with him so vast -a number of captives, it is, of course, clear that the lowest and -poorest part of the population was left.[421] We can imagine the wild -confusion which arose when they found themselves compelled to share -the dismantled palaces and abandoned estates of the wealthy with the -horde of new colonists, whose language, in all probability, they but -imperfectly understood. There must have been many a tumult, many a -scene of horror, such as took place in the long antagonism of Normans -and Saxons in England, before the immigrants and the relics of the -former populace settled down to amalgamation and mutual tolerance. - -Sargon is said to have carried away with him the golden calf or calves -of Bethel, as Tiglath-Pileser is said by the Rabbis to have carried away -that of Dan.[422] He also took away with him all the educated classes, -and all the teachers of religion.[423] No one was left to instruct the -ignorant inhabitants; and, as Hosea had prophesied, there was neither a -sacrifice, nor a pillar, nor an ephod, and not even teraphim to which -they could resort.[424] Naturally enough, the disunited dregs of an old -and of a new population had no clear knowledge of religion. They "feared -not Jehovah." The sparseness of inhabitants, with its consequent neglect -of agriculture, caused the increase of wild beasts among them. There had -always been lions and bears in "the swellings of Jordan,"[425] and in -all the lonelier parts of the land; and to this day there are leopards -in the woods of Carmel, and hyænas and jackals in many regions. -Conscious of their miserable and godless condition, and afflicted by the -lions, which they regarded as a sign of Jehovah's anger, the Ephraimites -sent a message to the King of Assyria. They only claimed Jehovah as -their local god, and complained that the new colonists had provoked the -wrath of "the God of the land" by not knowing His "manner"--that is, -the way in which He should be worshipped. The consequence was that they -were in danger of being exterminated by lions. The kings of Assyria were -devoted worshippers of Assur and Merodach, but they held the common -belief of ancient polytheists that each country had its own potent -divinities. Sargon, therefore, gave orders that one of the priests of -his captivity should be sent back to Samaria, "to teach them the manner -of the god of the land." The priest selected for the purpose returned, -took up his residence at the old shrine of Bethel, and "taught them how -they should fear Jehovah." His success was, however, extremely limited, -except among the former followers of Jeroboam's dishonoured cult. The -old religious shrines still continued, and the immigrants used them for -the glorification of their former deities. Samaria, therefore, witnessed -the establishment of a singularly hybrid form of religionism. The -Babylonians worshipped Succoth-Benoth,[426] perhaps Zirbanit, wife of -Merodach or Bel; the Cuthites worshipped Nergal, the Assyrian war-god, -the lion-god;[427] the Hittites, from Hamath, worshipped Ashima or -Esmûn, the god of air and thunder, under the form of a goat;[428] the -Avites preferred Nibhaz and Tartak, perhaps Saturn--unless these names -be Jewish jeers, implying that one of these deities had the head of a -dog, and the other of an ass.[429] More dreadful, if less ridiculous, -was the worship of the Sepharvites, who adored Adrammelech and -Anammelech, the sun-god under male and female forms, to whom, as to -Moloch, they burnt their children in the fire. As for ministers, "they -made unto them priests from among themselves,[430] who offered -sacrifices for them in the shrines of the bamoth." Thus the whole -mongrel population "feared the Lord, and served their own gods," as they -continued to do in the days of the annalist whose record the historian -quotes. He ends his interesting sketch with the words, that, in spite of -the Divine teaching, "these nations"--so he calls them, and so -completely does he refuse to them the dignity of being Israel's -children--feared the Lord, and served their graven images, their -children likewise, and their children's children,--"as did their -fathers, so do they unto this day."[431] - -The "unto this day" refers, no doubt, to the document from which the -historian of the Kings was quoting--perhaps about B.C. 560, in the third -generation after the fall of Samaria. A very brief glance will suffice -to indicate the future history of the Samaritans. We hear but little of -them between the present reference and the days of Ezra and Nehemiah. By -that time they had purged themselves of these grosser idolatries, and -held themselves fit in all respects to co-operate with the returned -exiles in the work of building the Temple. Such was not the opinion of -the Jews. Ezra regarded them as "the adversaries of Judah and -Israel."[432] The exiles rejected their overtures. In B.C. 409 Manasseh, -a grandson of the high priest expelled by Nehemiah for an unlawful -marriage with a daughter of Sanballat, of the Samaritan city of -Beth-horon, built the schismatic temple on Mount Gerizim.[433] The -relations of the Samaritans to the Jews became thenceforth deadly. In -B.C. 175 they seconded the profane attempt of Antiochus Epiphanes to -paganise the Jews, and in B.C. 130 John Hyrcanus, the Maccabee, -destroyed their temple. They were accused of waylaying Jews on their way -to the Feasts, and of polluting the Temple with dead bones.[434] They -claimed Jewish descent (John iv. 12), but our Lord called them "aliens" -(ἀλλογενής, Luke xvii. 18), and Josephus describes them as "residents -from other nations" (μέτοικοι, ἀλλοεθνεῖς). They are now a rapidly -dwindling community of fewer than a hundred souls--"the oldest and -smallest sect in the world"--equally despised by Jews and Mohammedans. -The Jews, as in the days of Christ, have no dealings with them. When Dr. -Frankl, on his philanthropic visit to the Jews of the East, went to see -their celebrated Pentateuch, and mentioned the fact to a Jewish -lady--"What!" she exclaimed: "have you been among the worshippers of the -pigeon? Take a purifying bath!" Regarding Gerizim as the place which -God had chosen (John iv. 20), they alone can keep up the old tradition -of the _sacrificial_ passover. For long centuries, since the Fall of -Jerusalem, it is only on Gerizim that the Paschal lambs and kids have -been actually slain and eaten, as they are to this day, and will be, -till, not long hence, the whole tribe disappears. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[389] Hos. iv. 4; v. 1, "Hear ye this, O priests ... ye have been a -snare on Mizpah," etc.; vi. 9, "The company of the priests murder by -the way to Shechem." - -[390] Hos. x. 10 (so R.V., and in the main the versions after the Hebrew -margin). LXX., ἐν τῷ παιδεύεσθαι αὐτοὺς ἐν ταῖς δύσιν ἀδικίαις αὐτῶν; -Vulg., "_cum corripientur propter duas iniquitates suas_"; A.V., "When -they shall bind themselves in their two furrows." I believe that the -"_two_ iniquities" may mean _two_ cherubs at Bethel. See x. 15: "So -shall Bethel do unto you because of the evil of your evil." - -[391] Hos. xi. 8-11. - -[392] 2 Kings xvii. 1 is inconsistent with xv. 30, 33, and it is -wholly useless for our purpose to enter into complicated chronological -hypotheses, every one of which may be erroneous. - -[393] Schrader, _K. A. T._, p. 255. - -[394] _Seder Olam_, xxii. 2; 2 Chron. xxx. 6-11. - -[395] See Herod., ii. 137; called So (Heb., Sô or Seve) in 2 Kings xvii. -4. Perhaps Shebek, the founder of the twenty-fifth dynasty. LXX., Σηγώρ; -Vulg., _Sua_; Manetho, _Sabachon_. In the _Eponym Canon_ he is called an -Egyptian general, _Sibakhi_, who helped Gaza against Assyria, and was -defeated. The _ka_ appended at the end of his name (Egyptian Shaba-ka) -is thought by some to be the Cushite article. The race of the priest -Hirhor died out with Piankhi, and the Ethiopians elected a noble named -Kashta. Shabak was his son. He conquered Sais, and burnt his rival -Bek-en-raut alive (B.C. 724). His dynasty ruled for fifty years; he was -succeeded by Sevechus (Shabatok), and he by Tehrak (Tirhakah). - -[396] His name means "Salmân, pardon." We have no monuments or -inscriptions of this king; only an imperial weight. - -[397] Mic. v. 1. - -[398] Hos. xiii. 13. - -[399] Hos. xiii. 7-11. The prophecy is rhythmic, though not written in -actual poetry. - -[400] Till the discovery of the Assyrian records, Sargon (Sharru-kênu, -'the faithful king') was but a name. The Jews knew but little of him. He -is but once mentioned in Scripture (Isa. xx. 1), and was probably -confused by some Jews with other kings. Yet he reigned sixteen years -(722-705), and his records give the annals of fifteen campaigns. In 720 -he crushed a confederacy headed by Yahubid of Hamath, and reduced that -city to a "heap of ruins." He then advanced against Hanno, King of Gaza, -who was in alliance with Sabaco, and defeated the combined forces of the -Philistines and Egyptians at Raphia, half-way between Gaza and the -Wady-el-Arîsh, "the torrent [_nachal_] of Egypt." Sargon was at the time -too much occupied with other enemies to pursue his advantage over Egypt; -for Armenia, Media, and other countries needed his attention. This -encouraged Ashdod to rebel, and its king, Azuri, refused his tribute -(see Isa. xx. 1). Sargon deposed him, and put his brother Ahimit in his -place. Relying on Egyptian promises, Philistia joined Judah, Edom, and -Moab in defying Assyria. They deposed Ahimit as an Assyrian nominee, and -put Yaman in his place. Egypt, as usual, failed to help, and in 711 the -Assyrian Turtan, or Commander-in-chief, took Ashdod after three years' -resistance, and carried its people into captivity. The punishment of -Egypt was reserved for the subsequent reigns of Esarhaddon (681-668) and -Assurbanipal. See Driver's _Isaiah xlv._ (Isa. xx.). Isa. xiv. 29-32 is -an ode of triumph for the Fall of Philistia. - -[401] Hos. xiii. 16. - -[402] See De Hincks in _Journ. of Sacr. Lit._, October 1858; Layard, -_Nin. and Bab._, i. 148. - -[403] Isa. xxviii. 1-4. - -[404] 2 Kings xvii. 13, "by all the prophets, and all the _seers_," -(_chôseh_). Hāvernick thinks that the _nebi'îm_ were such _officially_. - -[405] See Amos ii. 4, 5; Isa. xxviii. 15; Jer. xvi. 19, 20; Ezek. xx. -13-30, etc. - -[406] Deut. xxvi. 5. - -[407] Isa. xli. 14. - -[408] Hos. xi. 9. - -[409] See my _Minor Prophets_, 6-97. - -[410] Not as in A.V., "Habor, _by_ the river of Gozan." - -[411] 2 Kings xvii. 6. The LXX. has "rivers" and "mountains": ἐν Ἀλαὲ -καὶ ἐν Ἀβὼρ ποταμοῖς Γωζὰν καὶ ὅρη Μήδων. The river is not Ezekiel's -Chebar. These deportations _en masse_ of a whole population, with -their women and children, their waggons and flocks, are depicted on -Sargon's series of tablets in his splendid palace at Khorsabad. - -[412] Ezra iv. 10. "The great and noble Asnapper" of the passage is -either some Assyrian general, or a confusion of the name Assurbanipal. - -[413] 2 Kings xvii. 9. Heb., "covered"; A.V. and R.V., "did secretly," -rather "perfidiously"; LXX., ἠμφιέσαντο λόγους ἀδίκους κατὰ κύριον; -Vulg., _Et offenderunt verbis non rectis dominum suum_. - -[414] Star-worship is not mentioned in the Book of the Covenant (Exod. -xx.-xxiii.) or the oldest sections of the Mosaic Law. It is first -forbidden in Deut. iv. 19, xvii. 3, when contact with Syrians and -Assyrians made it known (comp. Job xxxi. 26-28; Jer. viii. 2, xix. 13; -Zeph. i. 5). The language of 2 Kings vii.-xxiii. frequently reflects -the prohibitions of Deuteronomy (see Deut. xii. 2, 30, 31, iv. 19, v. -7, 8, xvi. 21, xviii. 10, xxxi. 16, etc.) - -[415] In 2 Kings xvii. 11, for "they did wicked things," the LXX. has -κοινωνοὺς (_i.e._, _qedeshîm_) ἐχάραξαν καὶ ἑταιρίδας (_qedeshôth_); -_i.e._, they had depraved _hieroduli_ of both sexes. Comp. Hos. iv. -14; Gen. xxxviii. 21 (where the allusion is to one of the votaries of -Asherah). - -[416] Bishop Lightfoot, _Sermons_, p. 267. - -[417] "La quale Religione se ne Principi della Republica Christiana si -fusse mantenuta, secondo che dal dottore d'essa ne fu ordinato, -sarebbero gli State e le Republiche Christiane più unite e più felici -assai ch' elle non sono" (_Discorsi_, i. 12). - -[418] 2 Kings xvii. 24. Comp. xviii. 34. Hence the later Jews -comprehensively called the Samaritans Cuthites. Comp. 2 Kings xix. 13; -Isa. xxxvii. 13. - -[419] Heliopolis, Ptolemy, v. 18, § 7; Isa. xxxvi. 19. Here, according -to the Chaldæan legends, Xisuthrus buried his tablets about the -Creation, etc. - -[420] From Ezra iv. 2 some infer that the main immigrants were -introduced by Esarhaddon, who did not succeed till B.C. 681. He claims -to have colonised Syria. - -[421] So we see from 2 Kings xix. 13, which applies to the reign of -Hezekiah. - -[422] See Appendix, "The Golden Calves." - -[423] He uses the agency of "the great and noble Asnapper" (Ezra iv. -10) for the deportation (see Botta, 145; Layard, _Nin. and Bab._, i. -148; Dr. Hincks, _Jour. of Sacr. Lit._, October 1858), unless Asnapper -be a confusion for Assurbanipal (Sardanapalus). - -[424] Hos. iii. 4. - -[425] See Jer. xlix. 19, l. 44; Prov. xxii. 13, etc. - -[426] Lit., "Daughter-huts" (Selden, _De Dis Syr._, ii. 7), but probably -a transliteration. Zarpanit--"She who gives seed"--was Aphrodite -Pandemos (Mylitta--Herod., i. 199). The Rabbis--who only guess--say she -represented "the Clucking Hen"--_i.e._, the Pleiades. There does not -seem to be any connection between Succoth and "Sakkuth," the various -reading in Amos v. 26, which seems to be the Assyrian Moloch. - -[427] Said to be worshipped under the form of a cock. - -[428] LXX., Ἐβλαζέρ. Jarchi says these deities were worshipped under -base animal forms--but it is more than doubtful. - -[429] The Rabbis, from Exod. xxiii. 13; Josh. xxiii. 7, thought they -were bound to give scornful nicknames to heathen deities. Hence such -changes as Kir-Heres for Kir-Cheres, Beelzebub for Beelzebul, Bethaven -for Bethel, Bosheth for Baal, etc. - -[430] Not as in A.V., "of the lowest of them," but "of all classes." -Comp. 1 Kings xii. 31. - -[431] In 2 Kings xvii. 31-38 we again find repeated references to -Deuteronomy (iv. 23, v. 32, x. 20, etc.). - -[432] Ezra iv. 1. The actual word "Samaritans" occurs only once in the -Old Testament, in 2 Kings xvii. 29. - -[433] See Neh. xiii. 4-9, 28, 29; Jos., _Antt._, XI. vii. 2. Josephus -makes Manasseh a brother of the high priest Jaddua (B.C. 333). - -[434] Jos., _Antt._, IX. xiv. 3, XII. v. 5, XIII. ix. 1, XX. vi., -XVIII. ii. 2. The bitterly hostile relations between Jews and -Samaritans in the time of Christ are illustrated by Luke ix. 52-54. - - - - - CHAPTER XXII - - _THE REIGN OF AHAZ_ - - B.C. 735-715 - - 2 KINGS xvi. 1-20 - - "Rimmon, whose delightful seat - Was fair Damascus, on the fertile banks - Of Abbana and Pharphar, lucid streams. - He also against the House of God was bold: - A leper once he lost, and gained a king-- - Ahaz, his sottish conqueror, whom he drew - God's altar to disparage and displace - For one of Syrian mode, whereon to burn - His odious offerings, and adore the gods - Whom he had vanquished." - _Paradise Lost_, i. 467-476. - - -According to our authorities, Ahaz ("Possessor")[435] began his reign -of sixteen years at the age of twenty. Of the exactitude of these -references we cannot be certain, because they also state (2 Kings -xviii. 2) that Hezekiah was twenty-five years old when he began to -reign, and this reduces us to the absurdity of supposing that Hezekiah -was born when his father was only eleven years old.[436] We might -infer from Isa. iii. 4 that Ahaz was not so old as twenty when he -succeeded Jotham; for there--in a terrible prophecy which can only -refer to the beginning of this reign--we read, "And I will give -children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them"; or, as -it should be perhaps rendered, "And with childishness, or wilfulness, -shall they rule over them." - -Whatever may have been the king's age, surely never king succeeded to -a more distracted kingdom, or reigned over a more terrified people! If -he could have had any choice in the matter, he might well have -declined the fearful burden. Describing the state of things, the great -prophet Isaiah, who now began his career, exclaims,-- - -"For, behold, the Lord, the Lord of hosts, doth take away from Jerusalem -and from Judah stay and staff, the whole stay of bread, and the whole -stay of water; the mighty man, and the man of war, the judge, and the -prophet, and the diviner, and the elder; the captain of fifty, and the -honourable man, and the counsellor, and the cunning charmer, and the -skilful enchanter. And the people shall be oppressed every one by -another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself -proudly against the elder, and the base against the honourable. Then a -man shall take hold of his brother in the house of his father, saying, -'Thou hast clothing, be _thou our judge, and let this ruin be under thy -hand_': in that day shall he lift his voice, saying, 'I will not be a -builder-up; for in my house is neither bread nor clothing: ye shall not -make me a ruler of the people.' For Jerusalem is ruined and Judah is -fallen. The show of their countenance is against them; and they declare -their sin as Sodom, and hide it not. As for My people, children are -their oppressors, and women rule over them."[437] - -This is a frightful picture of famine--the dearth of intellect, the -dearth of statesmen, of all genius, of all insight. It describes the -prevalence of oppression and of ghastly destitution, accompanied by -such utter despair that no one cared to exert himself for the arrest -of the ruin which seemed imminent over that which was already no -better than itself a ruin. - -The Book of Isaiah is arranged in a most confused and unchronological -manner, and it is probable that the first five chapters should be -placed after the sixth, which describes the prophet's call in the year -that King Uzziah died. They paint a picture of moral collapse. His -first chapter is called by Ewald "the great arraignment," and by its -references describes the awful period of alarm during the war of Syria -and Ephraim against Judah. It might seem as if the combined host was -even then in the country, or had only just retired from it; for we -read,-- - -"Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire: your land, -strangers devour it in your presence, and it is desolate, as overthrown -by strangers. And the daughter of Zion is left as a booth in a -wilderness, as a lodge in a garden of cucumbers, as a besieged city." - -But even in the midst of this afflictive dispensation there were no -signs of repentance. The children of Israel were rebels who despised -the Holy One of Israel,--"Ah, sinful nation, a people laden with -iniquity, a seed of evil-doers, children that deal corruptly!" (i. -7-9). They had all the externals of religion: they offered vain -sacrifices, and kept a multitude of idle feasts, and offered many -formal prayers; but all this was but a cumbrance to Him who desired -clean hands and a pure heart as conditions of forgiveness (10-20). -What hope could there be for a city of murderers, who loved bribes -and perverted judgment (21-24)? The land was full of pride, full of -idols, full of the luxury of the rich amid the starvation of the poor -(ii. 1-22).[438] Women partook of the general corruption. They walked -mincingly with stretched-forth necks and wanton eyes,[439] thinking of -nothing but their anklets, and crescents, and bracelets, and mufflers, -ear-drops, head-tires, perfumes, mirrors, armlets, and nose-jewels: -therefore they should have sackcloth for stomachers, ropes for -girdles, and burning instead of beauty, and only a remnant should -escape (iii. 16-iv. 1). Judah was like a vineyard,--rich in -advantages, blessed with fondest care; but when God looked for grapes, -it only brought forth wild grapes--a semblance, but only a poisoned -semblance, of the true vintage: therefore it should be left neglected -and rainless. Woe to the greedy land-grabbing, and drunkenness, and -revelry of the rich! Woe to their mockery of God and their devotion to -vanity! Woe to their insane pride and wanton injustice! Could they -escape vengeance? No! Jehovah had looked for judgment (_mishpat_), but -behold oppression (_mishpach_); for righteousness (_tse'dakah_), but -behold a cry (_tse'akah_) (v. 1-24).[440] They might escape--they -would escape--the Syrian and the Ephraimite; but behind these lay a -more terrible and a more portentous foe, even the Assyrian, the -scourge of God's wrath (25-30). - -"It was told the house of David, saying, Syria is confederate with -Ephraim." Is it strange that in such a condition of things the heart -of Ahaz and of his people "was moved as the trees of the wood are -moved with the wind"? - -Such was the terrible crisis at which Isaiah began his ministry. He -was the son of Amoz,[441] who has been (much too precariously) -identified with a brother of Amaziah. It is probable that he was a man -of distinguished, if not princely, birth, and he exercised a more -powerful influence over the politics of his country than any other -prophet--not even excepting Jeremiah. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[435] Probably a shortened form for Jehoahaz ("The Lord taketh hold"). -He is called Jahuhazi in Tiglath-Pileser's inscription (Schrader, -_Keilinschr._, p. 163). - -[436] For twenty-five it is not improbable that we should read fifteen. - -[437] Isa. iii. 1-12. - -[438] In Isa. ii. 2-4 we find, as so often in the prophetic books in -their present too-often-haphazard arrangement, a glowing promise of -universal peace placed before unsparing denunciations. The verses are -also found in Micah (iv. 1, 2), and it has been conjectured that in -both prophets they are a quotation from some older source--perhaps -from Jonah, son of Amittai. - -[439] Heb., "deceiving with their eyes." - -[440] Isa. v. 7. The paronomasia of the original is striking. Van Oort -renders it, "He looked for _reason_, but behold _treason_; and for -_right_, but behold _affright_." - -[441] His name means "Jehovah saves," and is perhaps alluded to in Isa. -viii. 18. Amos ("One who bears a burden"), needless to say, is a totally -different name from that of Amoz ("Vigorous"), the father of Isaiah. - - - - - CHAPTER XXIII - - _ISAIAH AND AHAZ_ - - 2 KINGS xvi - - "Expediency is man's wisdom; doing right is God's." - GEORGE MEREDITH. - - -Isaiah was one of those men whom God provides for the need of -kingdoms. He was not only a prophet, but a statesman, a reformer, a -poet, a man of invincible faith and unequalled insight. If Ahaz had -accepted his counsels and followed his moral guidance, the whole -history of Judah might have been different. - -But the position of things was indeed disastrous. Judah was attacked -from every side. On the south-east the Edomites renewed their -devastating raids, and swept off multitudes of captives, who were sold -as slaves in the Western slave-markets. On the south-west the -Philistines once more rose in revolt, and acquired permanent -repossession of many parts of the Shephelah, mastering Beth-Shemesh, -Ajalon, Gederoth, Shocho, Timnath, Gimzo, and all the adjacent -districts. But this was nothing compared with the humiliation and -destruction inflicted by Rezin and Pekah. They shut up Ahaz in -Jerusalem; and though they could not storm its almost impregnable -defences, which had recently been fortified by Uzziah and Jotham, they -were undisputed masters of the rest of the land, so that Judah was -"brought low and made naked."[442] Rezin, indeed, weary of a tedious -siege, swept southwards to Elath, on the gulf of Akabah, seized it, and -peopled it with an Edomite garrison, thereby destroying the commerce in -which Solomon and Jehoshaphat had taken pride, and which Uzziah had -recently re-established. Having thus left an effectual annoyance to -Judah in his rear, he gave up the design of dethroning Ahaz and -substituting in his place "_the son of Tabeal_," who would have been a -tool in the hands of the confederate kings. He seized, however, a -multitude of captives, and with them and with much booty he returned to -Damascus. "The son of Tabeal"--a name which occurs nowhere else--has -been found very puzzling.[443] I believe it to be simply an instance of -the Rabbinic process of transposition, called _Themourah_. Some identify -it with Itibi'alu of an inscription of Tiglath-Pileser. Others suppose -that he was a Syrian, and that Tabeal stands for Tabrimnon. But by the -application of Themourah (called the _Albam_) Tabeal simply gives us -"Remaliah," and is either a scornful variation of the name of Pekah's -father, or has arisen from the watchword of a secret conspiracy. Since -in the text of Jeremiah (li. 41, xxv. 26) (by _Atbash_, another form of -the secret transposition of letters of which the generic name was -_Gematria_) we read _Sheshach_ for Babel, the name Tabeal may have been -dealt with in a similar method.[444] Pekah, according to the Chronicler, -inflicted far deadlier injuries than Rezin. In one day he slew one -hundred and twenty thousand "sons of valour," because they had forsaken -Jehovah, God of their fathers. His general Zichri, a mighty Ephraimite, -slew Maaseiah, the king's son;[445] and Azrikam, the chancellor; and -Elkanah, "the second to the king." The army carried away two hundred -thousand captives and much spoil to Samaria. But on their arrival, a -prophet named Oded[446] reproved the Israelites for having massacred the -Judæans "in a rage that reacheth to heaven." Aided by various princes, -he succeeded in inducing the people to refuse to harbour the captives, -and clothed, fed, and sent them back unharmed to Jericho, mounting the -feeble on horses and asses. The story bears on the face of it the signs -of enormous exaggeration. - -In the crisis of their miseries, but just before the siege, Ahaz had -gone outside the city walls "at the end of the conduit of the upper -pool, in the causeway of the fuller's field," probably to look after -the water-supply, which had always been a difficulty for Jerusalem, -and on which depended her capacity to withstand a siege. Here he was -met by the prophet Isaiah, who was leading by the hand the little son -to whom he had given the name of "Shear-jashub" ("A remnant shall -return"),[447] as a witness to the truth of the prophecy which he had -heard on the occasion of his call,-- - -"And if there should yet be a tenth in it, this shall be again consumed; -yet as the terebinth and the oak, though cut down, have their stock -remaining, even so a sacred seed shall be the stock thereof."[448] - -The object of the prophet was to cheer up the fainting heart of the -king, and to say to him first,-- - -"Take heed, and be quiet." - -This mandate probably refers to rumours--which Isaiah must have -heard--of the king's intention to follow the counsels of the party which -urged him to seek foreign assistance. One of these parties advised him -to throw himself into the arms of Egypt, and rely on her protection; the -other gave the more perilous counsel of invoking the aid of Assyria. -Isaiah's mandate to the king and to the nation was to take neither step, -but to trust in the Lord, and to repent of individual and national -misdoing. He summed up his message in the rule,-- - -"In returning and rest shall ye be saved; in quietness and confidence -shall be your strength." - -The advice was emphasised by a promise of the most decisive and -encouraging kind. When all looked so helpless, the prophet was bidden -to say,-- - -"Fear not, neither be faint-hearted, for these two stumps of smoking -torches, for the fierce anger of Rezin with Syria, and of Remaliah's -son. They have taken evil counsel against thee. But thus saith the -Lord God, 'It shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass. For the -head of Syria is only Rezin, and the head of Samaria is a mere -Remaliah's son.'"[449] - -And then, to confirm the lesson of confidence in God, the brief -assurance,-- - - "If ye will not confide, - Surely ye shall not abide." - -Convinced of the certainty of this immediate deliverance, Isaiah bade -the king to ask for a sign from Jehovah, either in the height above, -or in the depth beneath. - -But the timid and hypocritical king was not so to be influenced. He -had on his side "the scornful men, who ruled Judah"; the mocking -priests, who sneered and jeered at Isaiah's teaching as repetitive and -commonplace, and only fit for children; and the princes and nobles, -who formed the Court party, headed by Shebna the scribe. He probably -looked on Isaiah as a mere unpractical faddist, an excited -fanatic--all very well as a prophet, but not a man who ought to thrust -himself into the plans of politicians. Ahaz had his own plans, and he -had not the smallest intention of altering them in consequence of -anything which Isaiah might say. He was far too timid and unfaithful -to rely on anything so vague as Divine assurance. He was convinced -that his only chance lay in the horses of Egypt or the fierce infantry -of Assyria. So he said with sham piety, merely intended to put the -prophet off, "I will not ask, neither will I tempt Jehovah." - -That moment marks what may be called the birth-throe of Messianic -prophecy in its most specific character. For then the prophet, after -reproving the king for wearying Jehovah as well as His servants, adds, -in words of far wider and deeper significance than their immediate -bearing, that Jehovah Himself should give a sign; for the maiden -should conceive and bear a Son, and call His name Immanuel ("God with -us"). The child should grow up in a time of scarcity; for owing to the -devastation of the land, he would only be able to be nurtured on -curdled milk and honey. But before he had reached years of -discretion--before he had arrived at the power of moral choice--the -land whose two kings Ahaz abhorred should be a desert. Yet let not -Ahaz exult too much in the immediate deliverance! Days of unexampled -misery were at hand. Jehovah should hiss for the fly from the farthest -canals of Egypt, and for the bee of Assyria, and they should settle in -swarms in the valleys and pastures. Ahaz--he had not alluded to the -design, but Isaiah knew it well--was about to hire a razor from beyond -the Euphrates, but that razor should sweep away the hair and beard of -Judah. Agriculture should languish, and the people should only be able -to live in privation on whey and honey; and the vineyards should be -full of briers and thorns, and should be mere places for hunting.[450] - -This event, therefore, as Caspari says, stands at the turning-point of -Old Testament History. It marks the beginning of that second period of -the History of the Chosen People in which their hopes were granted as -a counterpoise to their anguish and their humiliation. "It stood, -therefore, at the point where a prospect offered itself to the eye of -the prophet which reached out over the whole development of the people -of God." - -To all such prophecies Ahaz was utterly deaf: they did not for a -moment induce him to swerve from his purpose. But to call still -further attention to his promise as the Syrian Ephraimitish host -pressed forward, Isaiah took a great piece of vellum, and inscribed on -it, in the ordinary characters,-- - - "SPEED-PLUNDER-HASTE-SPOIL." - -He put it up in some conspicuous place, before his own house or in the -Temple, and took the priest Urijah and Zechariah, the son of -Jeberechiah, into his confidence as faithful witnesses. He told them the -explanation of his sign, and they would satisfy the curiosity of the -people on the subject. It meant that in nine months' time his wife -should bear a son, and that he and his wife, the prophetess, would call -the boy's name "Speed-plunder-haste-spoil," as a sign that before the -child was able to say "Father" or "Mother" Rezin and Pekah should be -extinguished. For the Assyrian should speed to the plunder and haste to -the spoil, and the riches of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria should be -carried away by the King of Assyria. Since Judah despised "the soft -flowing waters of Shiloah,"[451] and preferred Rezin and Pekah,[452] -they should be deluged by the Euphrates of Assyria, and Assyria's -outspread wings should overshadow thy land, O Immanuel (viii. 1-8). How -vain, then, of the people to try and meet the confederacy of Syria and -Ephraim by new confederacy of Judah with Assyria! This, after all, is -Immanuel's land. God is with us. We have but to fear God, we have but to -be faithful to duty, and Jehovah shall be our sanctuary, though He be a -stumbling-block to many in Israel, and a snare to many in -Jerusalem.[453] This is God's teaching and God's testimony, and Isaiah -and his children are signs of it. For does not Isaiah mean "Salvation of -Jehovah"; and Shear-jashub, "A remnant shall return"; and -Maher-shalal-hash-baz, "Swift-spoil-speedy-prey"; and Immanuel, "God is -with us"? What need, then, to seek wizards and necromancers? Seek God; -confide, abide![454] Trouble and darkness there should be; but all was -not utterly hopeless. Northern Israel had been bedimmed and afflicted; -but soon they should be exalted, and see light, and their yoke be broken -as in the day of Midian, and the trampling boot and blood-stained mantle -of the warrior shall be burned in the fire: for a Child is born, a Son -is given unto us of David's line, who shall be a Mighty Deliverer, a -Prince of Peace,--and Israel shall perish. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[442] 2 Chron. xxviii. 19. - -[443] It may mean "God is good" (Tabeel). - -[444] For further explanations I must refer to my paper on Rabbinic -Exegesis (_Expositor_, First Series, v. 373). - -[445] 2 Chron. xxviii. 7. - -[446] Of Oded nothing else is known. - -[447] Some, however, interpret the name "A remnant repents" (LXX., ὁ -καταλειφθεὶς Ἰασούβ; Vulg., _Qui derelictus est Jaseb_). - -[448] Isa. vi. 13. - -[449] The words "And within threescore and five years shall Ephraim be -broken, that it be not a people" (Isa. vii. 8), are almost certainly -an interpolation: for (1) the overthrow came within far less than -sixty years; (2) the clause awkwardly breaks the context; (3) the -"sixty years" is inconsistent with the promise (vii. 16) that it -should be within very few years. - -[450] Isa. vii. 1-25. - -[451] Not improbably the water which afterwards flowed through -Hezekiah's new tunnel between the Virgin's Tomb and the Pool of -Siloam. It is referred to in 2 Chron. xxxii. 3, 30 (Isa. xxii. 9-11). -See Appendix II. - -[452] This, if it be correct, can only mean that the son of Tabeal had -a party in Jerusalem; but Hitzig renders it "_dreadeth_," not -"rejoiceth in." - -[453] The meaning is by no means clear. - -[454] See Driver, _Isaiah_, p. 34. - - - - - CHAPTER XXIV - - _THE APOSTASIES OF AHAZ_ - - 2 KINGS xvi. 1-18 - - "For when we in our wickedness grow hard, - Oh misery on't! the wise gods seal our eyes; - In our own filth drop our clear judgments; make us - Adore our errors; laugh at us while we strut - To our confusion." - - -Ahaz was indifferent to these prophecies because his heart was -otherwhere. It is clear from our authorities that this king had excited -an unusually deep antipathy in the hearts of those later writers who -judged religion not only from the earlier standpoint, but from the stern -and inexorable requirements of the Deuteronomic and the Priestly Codes. -The historian, adopting an unusual phrase, says that "he did not that -which was right in the sight of the Lord, but he walked in the ways of -the kings of Israel." He not only continued the high places, as the best -of his predecessors had done, but he increased their popularity and -importance by personally offering sacrifices and burning incense "on the -hills and under every green tree." It is probable, too, that he -introduced into Judah horses and chariots dedicated to the sun.[455] "He -made molten images for the Baalim," says the Chronicler, "and burnt -incense in the valley of the son of Himmon." - -This last was his crowning atrocity: he actually sanctioned the -revolting worship of the abomination of the children of Ammon, which -Solomon had tolerated on the mount of offence. "He made his son to -pass through the fire." The Chronicler expresses it still more -dreadfully by saying that "he _burnt his children_ in the fire."[456] - -In the Valley of Ben-Hinnom, or of the Benî-Hinnom, of which the name -is perpetuated in Gehenna, the place of torture for lost souls, there -stood a frightful image of the king--Moloch, Melek, Malcham. It -represented the sun-god, worshipped, not only as Baal under the -emblems of prolific nature, but, like the Egyptian Typhon, as the -emblem of the sun's scorching and blighting force. It was perhaps a -human figure with the head of an ox. The arms of the brazen image -sloped downwards over a cistern, which was filled with fuel; and when -a human sacrifice was to be offered to him, the child was probably -first killed, and then placed on these brazen arms as a gift to the -idol. It rolled down into the flaming tank, and was consumed amid the -strains of music. Recourse was only had to the most frightful form of -human sacrifice--the burning of grown-up victims--in extremities of -disaster, as when Mesha of Moab offered up his eldest son to Chemosh -on the wall of Kir-Hareseth in the sight of his people and of the -three invading armies. But the sacrifice of children was public, and -perhaps annual. Hence Milton, following the learned researches of -Selden in his Syntagma _De Dis Syriis_, writes:-- - - "First, Moloch, horrid king, besmeared with blood - Of human sacrifice, and parents' tears; - Though, for the noise of drums and timbrels loud, - Their children's cries unheard that pass'd through fire - To his grim idol. Him the Ammonite - Worshipp'd in Rabba and her watery plain, - In Argob and in Basan, to the stream - Of utmost Arnon. Nor content with such - Audacious neighbourhood, the wisest heart - Of Solomon he led by fraud to build - His temple right against the Temple of God - On that opprobrious hill, and made his grove - The pleasant Valley of Hinnom, Tophet thence - And black Gehenna call'd, the type of hell."[457] - -But it may be doubted whether Ahaz, in spite of his frightful -position, or, in later days, the less excusable Manasseh, really -destroyed the lives of their young sons.[458] The ancients had a -notion that they could easily cheat their devil-deities. If a white ox -of Clitumnus became unfitted for a victim to Jupiter of the Capitol by -having on its body a few black spots, it was quite sufficient to make -it pass with the _Dî faciles_ by chalking the black spots over -it.[459] If human victims had to be thrown into the Tiber to Hercules, -Numa taught the people that little wickerwork images (_scirpea_) would -suit the purpose just as well.[460] Figures of dough were sometimes -offered instead of human beings on the altar of Artemis of Tauris. -Thus it became the custom, it is believed, merely to throw or to pass -children through or over the flames, and conventionally to _regard -them_ as having been sacrificed, though they might escape the ordeal -with little or no hurt. This was called _februatio_, or "lustration by -fire."[461] We may hope that this device was adopted by the two Judæan -kings, and, if so, they did not add to their horrible apostasy the -crime of infanticide. If, however, Ahaz was even to the smallest -extent implicated in such foul idolatries, it is not surprising that -he was in no mood to listen to Isaiah. What is profoundly surprising, -and is indeed a circumstance for which we cannot account, is that no -word of fierce indignation was addressed to him on this account by -Urijah, the high priest, whom Isaiah seems to describe as faithful, or -by Zechariah, the son of Jeberechiah, or by Micah, or by Isaiah, who -feared man so little and God so much. - -The Assyrian party at the Court of Ahaz prevailed over the Egyptian. -Until the accession of the Ethiopian Sabaco[462] in 725, Egypt was -indeed in so weak, harassed, and divided a condition under feeble -native Pharaohs, that her help was obviously unavailable. The King of -Judah, seeing no extrication from his calamities except in the way of -worldly expediency, appealed to Tiglath-Pileser. In this he followed -the precedent of his ancestor Asa, who had diverted the attack of -Baasha by invoking the assistance of Syria. Ahaz sent to the Assyrian -potentate the humble message, "I am thy servant and thy son: come up -and save me from the Kings of Syria and Israel." If he had not faith -to accept Isaiah's promises, what else could he do, when Syria, -Israel, the Philistines, Edom, and Moab were all arrayed against him? -The ambassadors probably made their way, not without peril, along the -east of Jordan, or else by sea from Joppa, and so inland. Whether they -took with them the enormous bribe without which the appeal of the -helpless king might have been in vain, or whether this was sent -subsequently under Assyrian escort, we do not know. It was -euphemistically described as "a present" or "a blessing," but must be -regarded either as a tribute or a bribe. - -Tiglath-Pileser II. saw his opportunity, and at once invaded Damascus. -In B.C. 733 he failed, but the next year he entirely subjugated the -kingdom, and put an end to the dynasty. Rezin was probably put to death -with the horrible barbarities which were normal among the brutal -Ninevites; and as the Assyrians had no conception of colonisation or the -wise government of dependencies, the Syrian population was deported _en -masse_ to Elam and an unknown Kir.[463] For a time Damascus was made "a -ruinous heap," and the cities of Aroer were the desolated lairs of -pasturing flocks. Israel, as we have seen, was next overwhelmed by the -same irremediable catastrophe, none of her people being left except such -as might be compared to the mere gleanings of a vintage, and the few -berries on the topmost boughs of the olive tree.[464] - -Tiglath-Pileser meant to make Ahaz feel his yoke. He summoned him to -do homage at Damascus, and there Ahaz once more displayed his -cosmopolitan æstheticism at the expense of every pure tradition of the -religion of his fathers. - -His visit to Damascus was no doubt compulsory. His worldly policy, -which looked so expedient, and which--apart from the defiance which it -involved to the voice of God by His prophets--seemed to be so -pardonable, had for the time succeeded. Isaiah's promises had been -fulfilled to the letter. There was nothing more to fear either from -Rezin or from Remaliah's son. Their kingdoms were a desolation. In his -own annals Tiglath-Pileser[465] does not exaggerate his -achievements.[466] He wrote as follows:-- - - "Rezin's warriors I captured, and with the sword I destroyed. - Of his charioteers and [his horsemen] the arms I broke: - Their bow-bearing warriors, [their footmen] armed with spear and - shield, - With my hand I captured them, and those that fought in their - battle-line. - He to save his life fled away alone; - Like a deer [he ran], and entered into the great gate of his city. - His generals, whom I had taken alive, on crosses I hung; - His country I subdued; - Damascus, his city, I subdued, and like a caged bird I shut him in. - I cut down the unnumbered trees of his forest; I left not one. - Hadara, the palace of the father of Rezin of Syria, [I burnt]. - The city of Samaria I besieged, I captured; eight hundred of its - people and children I took; - Their oxen and their sheep I carried away. - I took five hundred and ninety-one cities; - Over sixteen districts of Syria like a flood I swept." - -But the more complete destruction of Israel was due to Shalmaneser -IV., who says,-- - - "The city of Samaria I besieged, I took, - I carried away twenty-seven thousand two hundred of its inhabitants; - I seized fifty of their chariots. - I gave up to plunder the rest of their possessions. - I appointed officers over them; - I laid on them the tribute of the former king. - In their place I settled the men of conquered countries." - -The immediate service to Judah looked immense. The Assyrian might safely -claim, and Ahaz might truthfully confess, that the intervention of -Tiglath-Pileser had rescued him from the apparent imminence of -destruction. But the Assyrian kings served no one for nothing. The price -which had to be paid for Tiglath-Pileser's intervention was vassalage -and tribute. Ahaz, or, as the Assyrians call him, Jehoahaz,[467] had -styled himself Tiglath-Pileser's "servant and his son," and the Assyrian -chose to have substantial proof of this parental suzerainty. The great -king therefore summoned the poor subject-potentate to Damascus, where he -was holding his victorious court. - -So far Ahaz had no reason to complain of his "dreadful patron"; and if -he had returned when he paid his homage, no immediate harm would have -happened. But during his visit he saw "the altar" (_Heb._) at the -conquered city. Was it the altar of the defeated Syrian god Rimmon? or -did the Assyrian persuade his willing vassal to sacrifice at the -portable altar of his god Assur? We may, perhaps, infer the former -from 2 Chron. xxviii. 23, where Ahaz says: "Because the gods of the -kings of Syria help them, therefore will I sacrifice to them, that -they may help me." There is room to suspect some error here, because -Rezin had fallen, and Damascus was in ruins, and Rimmon had -conspicuously failed to help or to avenge his votaries.[468] Ahaz -admired the altar, to whatever god it had been erected; and unmindful, -or perhaps unconscious, that the altar of the Temple of Jerusalem was -declared in the Pentateuch to have been divinely ordained--a fact to -which the historian does not himself refer--he sent to the head priest -Urijah a pattern of the altar which had struck his fancy at Damascus. -The subservient priest, without a murmur or a remonstrance, undertook -to have a similar altar ready for Ahaz in the Temple by the time of -his return--a crime, if crime it were, which the Chronicler conceals. -"Never any prince was so foully idolatrous," says Bishop Hall, "as -that he wanted a priest to second him. A Urijah is fit to humour an -Ahaz.[469] Greatness could never command anything which some servile -wits were not ready both to applaud and justify." Certainly we should -have hoped for more fidelity to ancient tradition from a man who -earned the approving word of Isaiah; but it is only fair and just to -admit that Urijah, in the universal ignorance which prevailed about -the codes which were afterwards collected and published as the total -legislation of the wilderness, may have viewed his obedience to the -king's commands with very different eyes from those by which it was -regarded in the sixth and fifth centuries before Christ. He may have -been frankly unaware that he was guilty of an act which would -afterwards be denounced as an apostatising enormity.[470] - -When Ahaz returned, he was so much pleased with his new plaything that -he at once acted as priest at his own new altar. Without the least -opposition from the priests--who had so sternly resisted Uzziah--he -offered burnt-offerings and meat-offerings and drink-offerings, and -sprinkled the blood of peace-offerings on his altar.[471] Not content -with this, he did not hesitate to order the removal of the huge brazen -altar from the position, in front of the Temple porch, which it had -held since the days of Solomon. He did this in order that his own -favourite altar might be in the line of vision from the court, and not -be overshadowed by the old one, which he shifted from the place of -honour to the north side. He proceeded to call his own altar "the -great altar," and ordered that the morning burnt-offering, and the -evening _minchah_, and all the principal sacrifices should henceforth -be offered upon it.[472] He did not wholly supersede the old brazen -altar, which, he said, "shall be for me to inquire by," or, as the -Hebrew may perhaps mean, "it should await"--_i.e._, "I will hereafter -consider what to do with it." - -Ahaz is charged with the additional crime of removing the ornamental -festoons of bronze pomegranates from the lavers, and the brazen oxen -from under the molten sea, which henceforth lay dishonoured, without its -proper and splendid supports, on the pavement of the court.[473] He -also took away the balustrade of the royal "ascent" from the palace to -the Temple, and made a new entrance of a less gorgeous character than -that which, in the days of Solomon, the Queen of Sheba had admired.[474] - -No doubt these proceedings helped to heighten the unpopularity of -Ahaz. But what could he do? He could, indeed, if he had had sufficient -faith, have "trusted in Jehovah," as Isaiah bade him do. But he was -under the terrific pressure of hostile circumstances, and, being a -weak and timid man, felt himself unable to resist the influence of the -haughty politicians and worldly priests by whom he was surrounded--men -who openly made Isaiah their scoff. When he invited the interposition -of Tiglath-Pileser,[475] all the other consequences of humiliation -would naturally follow. He probably disliked as much as any one to see -the great molten laver taken off the backs of the oxen which showed -the skill of the ancient Hiram, and did not admire the despoiled -aspect of the shrine of his capital. But if the King of Assyria or his -emissaries had (as the historian implies) cast greedy eyes on these -splendid objects of antiquity, the poor vassal could not refuse them. -Better, he may have thought, that these material ornaments should go -to Nineveh than that he should be forced to exact yet heavier burdens -from an impoverished people. His expedient is mentioned among his -crimes, yet no one blamed the pious Hezekiah when, under similar -circumstances, he acted in precisely the same manner.[476] - -The Chronicler gives a darker aspect to his misdoings by saying that -he cut to pieces the vessels of the house of God, and made him altars -in every corner of Jerusalem, and _bamoth_ to burn incense unto other -gods in every several city of Judah. He says, further, that he closed -the great gates of the Temple; put an end to the kindling of the -lamps, the burning of incense, and the daily offerings; and left the -whole Temple to fall into ruin and neglect.[477] We know no more of -him. He lived through an epoch marked by the final crisis in the -existence of the kingdom of Israel. Dark omens of every kind were -around him, and he seems to have been too frivolous to see them. If he -plumed himself on the removal of the two relentless invaders Rezin and -Pekah, he must have lived to feel that the terror of Assyria had come -appreciably nearer. Tiglath-Pileser had only helped Judah in -furtherance of his own designs, and his exactions came like a chronic -distress after the acuter crisis. Nor was there any improvement when -he died in 727. He was succeeded by Shalmaneser IV., and Shalmaneser -IV. by Sargon in 722, the year of the fall of Samaria. We know no more -of Ahaz. The historian says that he was buried with his fathers, and -the Chronicler adds, as in the case of Uzziah and other kings, that -he was not permitted to rest in the sepulchres of the kings.[478] He -had sown the wind; his son Hezekiah had to reap the whirlwind.[479] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[455] See 2 Kings xxiii. 11, which shows that this was not an innovation -of Manasseh's. They were common in Persia. See Q. Curtius, iii. 3. - -[456] 2 Kings xvii. 31; Ezek. xvi. 21, xxiii. 37, xxxiii. 6; Deut. -xii. 31; Jer. xix. 5. See 2 Chron. xxviii. 3; for "his son," בְּנוֹ, -it uses בָּנָיו "his sons," but perhaps generically. Moloch-worship -may have been stimulated by accounts of the Assyrian fire-god -Adrammelech (Movers, _Phöniz._, ii. 101). On this sacrifice of -children to Moloch, which the Phœnicians referred back to the god El -or Il, once King of Byblos, who in a crisis of danger sacrificed his -eldest son Icond, see Plut., _De Superst._, § 13; Diod. Sic., xx. -12-14; 2 Kings iii. 27, xvi. 3, xxi. 6; Mic. vi. 7; Döllinger, -_Judenthum u. Heidenthum_ (E. T.), i. 427-429. - -[457] This worship was to be punished by stoning (Lev. xviii. 21, xx. -2-5; Deut. xviii. 10). On the whole subject see Movers, _Phöniz._, 64; -Jarchi _on Jer. vii._ 31; Euseb., _Præp. Ev._, iv. 16. - -[458] Josephus says that Ahaz made "a whole burnt-offering" of his -son; but his authority is very small (καὶ ἴδιον ὡλοκαύτωσεν παῖδα). -Comp. Psalm cvi. 37. - -[459] Ignorant Romanists have often cherished the same notions about -the saints. For centuries in Spain the people bought the old gowns and -cowls of the monks, and buried their dead in them, to deceive St. -Peter into the notion that they were Dominicans or Franciscans! - -[460] See Ovid, _Fasti_, v. 659: "Scripea pro domino Tiberi jactatur -imago." They were also called _Argei_, _id._ 621; Varro, _L. L._, vi. 3. - -[461] Varro, _L. L._, v. 3. - -[462] Herod., ii. 137. Egypt., _Sebek_; Heb., _So_ (2 Kings xvii. 4), -or perhaps _Seve_; Arab., _Shab'i_. Rawlinson, _Hist. of Anct. Egypt_, -ii. 433-450. - -[463] Kir (see Amos ix. 7) is omitted in the LXX. Elam is added in Isa. -xxii. 6. Tiglath-Pileser calls the king Rasunnu Sarimirisu--_i.e._, of -Aram. See Smith, _Assyr. Discoveries_, p. 274; _Eponym Canon_, 68; -Schrader, _K. A. T._, 152 ff. - -[464] Isa. xvii. 1-11. - -[465] The name seems to be Tuklat-abal-isarra,--according to Oppert -worshipper of the son of the Zodiac--_i.e._, of Nin or Hercules. -According to Polyhistor, he was a usurper who had been a vine-dresser -in the royal gardens. He never mentions his ancestry. But see -Schrader, _K. A. T._, 217 ff., 240 ff., and in Riehm. - -[466] _Eponym Canon_, p. 121, lines 1-15. On this fall of Damascus and -Samaria, see Isa. xvii. - -[467] Jahuhazi (Schrader, _Keilinschr._, p. 263). He probably bore -both names; but, as in the case of Jeconiah, who is called Coniah, the -omission of the element "Jehovah" from his name may have been intended -as a mark of reprobation. - -[468] The remark may refer to some earlier period in the reign of -Ahaz, before the capture of Damascus. It is more probable that the -altar was used for some Assyrian deity, and the adoption of it may -have flattered Tiglath-Pileser. - -[469] 2 Kings xvi. 11, which records the zealous subservience of Urijah, -is wanting in some MSS. of the LXX. But that the altar was made, and -without his opposition, is clear from the narrative. Asa (2 Chron. xv. -8) had repaired Solomon's great altar; Hezekiah subsequently cleansed it -(_id._ xxix. 18); Manasseh rebuilt it (_Q'ri_). The brass of it -ultimately went to Babylon (Jer. lii. 17-20). - -[470] Bähr says: "It seems that Urijah, like his companion, was only -anxious for his revenues. At any rate, his conduct is a sign of the -character and standing of the priests of that time. They were 'dumb -dogs who could not bark.' They all followed their own ways, every one -for his own gain" (Isa. lvi. 10, 11). "We have in this high priest," -says the _Würtemberg Summary_, "a specimen of those hypocrites and -belly-servants who say, 'Whose bread I eat, his song I sing'; who veer -about with the wind, and seek to be pleasant to all men; who wish to -hurt no one's feelings, but teach just what any one wants to hear." - -[471] 1 Kings viii. 64; 2 Chron. iv. 1. In this and similar instances -commentators, biassed by _a priori_ considerations, have imagined that -Ahaz did not in person offer sacrifices. But this is what the text says, -and it was the custom of kings to regard themselves as invested with -Divine attributes. Ahaz may have had this lesson impressed on his mind -by his visit to Tiglath-Pileser. See Grätz, _Gesch. der Juden._, ii. -150. Layard, _Nin. and Bab._, 472 ff., gives us pictures of Assyrian -kings ministering at their altars, which are of various shapes. - -[472] 2 Kings xvi. 15. Vulg., _paratum erit ad voluntatem meam_. The -LXX. followed another reading: ἔσται μοὶ εἰς τὸ πρωί. Grätz (ii. 150), -for לכקר, "to inquire," reads לקרב "to draw near to." - -[473] 1 Kings vii. 23-39. - -[474] 2 Kings xvi. 18. The allusions are obscure. R.V., "the covered -way"; A.V., "the covert for the Sabbath." See 2 Chron. ix. 4. Here the -Hebr. _Q'ri_ has _Mûsak_, and the Vulg. _Musach Sabbati_. The LXX. -evidently did not understand it (καὶ τὸν θεμέλιον τῆς καθέδρας -ᾠκοδόμησεν). For "covert for the Sabbath," Geiger suggests "molten -images for the Shame" (Bosheth-Baal, by transposition of _Shabbath_). -Comp. 2 Chron. xxviii. 2. - -[475] 2 Chron. xxviii. 20: "Tiglath-Pileser came unto him, and -distressed him, but helped him not." - -[476] 2 Kings xviii. 15, 16. - -[477] In justice to Ahaz, we should observe that (1) in every instance -the later account multiplies and magnifies and gives a darker -colouring to his offences; (2) that neither Isaiah, Micah, nor any -other prophet has a word of reproach for such enormities in Ahaz. - -[478] It is a Jewish tradition that Hezekiah would not bury his father -Ahaz in a sarcophagus, but on a bier (_Pesachin_, f. 56, 1; -_Sanhedrin_, f. 47, 1; Grätz, _Gesch. d. Juden._, ii, 224). - -[479] His name, _Chizquîyyah_, is shortened from _Yechizquîyyahoo_ -(Isa. i. 1; 2 Kings xx. 10; Hos. i. 1). It means "Jehovah's strength" -(_Gesen._), or "Yah is might" (_Fûrst_). - - - - - PROBABLE DATES. - - - B.C. - - 745. Accession of Tiglath-Pileser. - - 746. Death of Uzziah. Accession of Jotham. First vision of Isaiah - (Isa. vi.). - - 735. Accession of Ahaz. Syro-Ephraimitish war. - - 734-732. Siege and capture of Damascus, and ravage of Northern - Israel by Tiglath-Pileser. Visit of Ahaz to Damascus. - - 727. Accession of Shalmaneser IV. - - 722. Accession of Sargon. Capture of Samaria, and captivity of the - Ten Tribes. - - 720. Defeat of Sabaco by Sargon at Raphia. - - 715(?). Accession of Hezekiah. - - 711. Sargon captures Ashdod. - - 707. Sargon defeats Merodach-Baladan, and captures Babylon. - - 705. Murder of Sargon. Accession of Sennacherib. - - 701. Sennacherib besieges Ekron. Defeats Egypt at Altaqu. Invades - Judah, and spares Hezekiah. Invades Egypt, and sends the Rabshakeh - to Jerusalem. Disaster of Assyrians at Pelusium, and disappearance - from before Jerusalem. - - 697. Death of Hezekiah. Accession of Manasseh. - - 681. Death of Sennacherib. - - 608. Battle of Megiddo. Death of Josiah. - - 607. Fall of Nineveh and Assyria. Triumph of Babylon. - - 605. Battle of Carchemish. Defeat of Pharaoh Necho by - Nebuchadrezzar. - - 599. First deportation of Jews to Babylon by Nebuchadrezzar. - - 588. Destruction of Jerusalem. Second deportation. - - 538. Cyrus captures Babylon. - - 536. Decree of Cyrus. Return of Zerubbabel and the first Jewish - exiles. - - 458. Return of Ezra. - - - - - CHAPTER XXV - - _HEZEKIAH_ - - B.C. 715-686[480] - - 2 KINGS xviii - - "For Ezekias had done the thing that pleased the Lord, and was - strong in the ways of David his father, as Esay the prophet, who - was great and faithful in his vision, had commanded him,"--ECCLUS. - xlviii. 22. - - -The reign of Hezekiah was epoch-making in many respects, but especially -for its religious reformation, and the relations of Judah with Assyria -and with Babylon. It is also most closely interwoven with the annals of -Hebrew prophecy, and acquires unwonted lustre from the magnificent -activity and impassioned eloquence of the great prophet Isaiah, who -merits in many ways the title of "the Evangelical Prophet," and who was -the greatest of the prophets of the Old Dispensation. - -According to the notice in 2 Kings xviii. 2, Hezekiah was twenty-five -years old when he began to reign in the third year of Hoshea of -Israel. This, however, is practically impossible consistently with the -dates that Ahaz reigned sixteen years and became king at the age of -twenty, for it would then follow that Hezekiah was born when his -father was a mere boy--and this, although Hezekiah does not seem to -have been the eldest son; for Ahaz had burnt "his son," and, according -to the Chronicler, more than one son, to propitiate Moloch. Probably -Hezekiah was a boy of fifteen when he began to reign. The chronology -of his reign of twenty-nine years is, unhappily, much confused. - -The historian of the Kings agrees with the Chronicler, and the son of -Sirach, in pronouncing upon him a high eulogy, and making him equal -even to David in faithfulness. There is, however, much difference in -the method of their descriptions of his doings. The historian devotes -but one verse to his reformation--which probably began early in his -reign, though it occupied many years. The Chronicler, on the other -hand, in his three chapters manages to overlook, if not to suppress, -the one incident of the reformation which is of the deepest interest. -It is exactly one of those suppressions which help to create the deep -misgiving as to the historic exactness of this biassed and late -historian. It must be regarded as doubtful whether many of the Levitic -details in which he revels are or are not intended to be literally -historic. Imaginative additions to literal history became common among -the Jews after the Exile, and leaders of that day instinctively drew -the line between moral homiletics and literal history. It may be -perfectly historical that, as the Chronicler says, Hezekiah opened and -repaired the Temple; gathered the priests and the Levites together, -and made them cleanse themselves; offered a solemn sacrifice; -reappointed the musical services; and--though this can hardly have -been till after the Fall of Samaria in 722--invited all the Israelites -to a solemn, but in some respects irregular, passover of fourteen -days. It may be true also that he broke up the idolatrous altars in -Jerusalem, and tossed their _débris_ into the Kidron; and (again after -the deportation of Israel) destroyed some of the _bamoth_ in Israel as -well as in Judah. If he reinstituted the courses of the priests, the -collection of tithes, and all else that he is said to have done,[481] -he accomplished quite as much as was effected in the reign of his -great-grandson Josiah. But while the Chronicler dwells on all this at -such length, what induces him to omit the most significant fact of -all--the destruction of the brazen serpent? - -The historian tells us that Hezekiah "removed the _bamoth_"--the -chapels on the high places, with their ephods and teraphim--whether -dedicated to the worship of Jehovah or profaned by alien idolatry. -That he did, or attempted, something of this kind seems certain; for -the Rabshakeh, if we regard his speech as historical in its details, -actually taunted him with impiety, and threatened him with the wrath -of Jehovah on this very account. Yet here we are at once met with the -many difficulties with which the history of Israel abounds, and which -remind us at every turn that we know much less about the inner life -and religious conditions of the Hebrews than we might infer from a -superficial study of the historians who wrote so many centuries after -the events which they describe. Over and over again their incidental -notices reveal a condition of society and worship which violently -collides with what seems to be their general estimate. Who, for -instance, would not infer from this notice that in Judah, at any rate, -the king's suppression of the "high places," and above all of those -which were idolatrous, had been tolerably thorough? How much, then, -are we amazed to find that Hezekiah had not effectually desecrated -even the old shrines which Solomon had erected to Ashtoreth, Chemosh, -and Milcom[482] "at the right hand of the mount of corruption"--in -other words, on one of the peaks of the Mount of Olives, in full view -of the walls of Jerusalem and of the Temple Hill! - -"And he brake the images," or, as the R.V. more correctly renders it, -"the pillars," the _matstseboth_. Originally--that is, before the -appearance of the Deuteronomic and the Priestly Codes--no objection -seems to have been felt to the erection of a _matstsebah_. Jacob erected -one of these _baitulia_ or anointed stones at Bethel, with every sign of -Divine approval.[483] Moses erected twelve round his altar at -Sinai.[484] Joshua erected them in Shechem and on Mount Ebal. Hosea, in -one passage (iii. 4), seems to mention pillars, ephods, and teraphim as -legitimate objects of desire. Whether they have any relation to -obelisks, and what is their exact significance, is uncertain; but they -had become objects of just suspicion in the universal tendency to -idolatry, and in the deepening conviction that the second commandment -required a far more rigid adherence than it had hitherto received. - -"And cut down the groves"--or rather the Asherim, the wooden, and -probably in some instances phallic, emblems of the nature-goddess -Asherah, the goddess of fertility.[485] She is sometimes identified with -Astarte, the goddess of the moon and of love; but there is no -sufficient ground for the identification. Some, indeed, doubt whether -Asherah is the name of a goddess at all. They suppose that the word only -means a consecrated pole or pillar, emblematic of the sacred tree.[486] - -Then comes the startling addition, "And brake in pieces the brazen -serpent that Moses had made: _for unto those days the children of -Israel did burn incense to it_." This addition is all the more -singular because the Hebrew tense implies habitual worship. The story -of the brazen serpent of the wilderness is told in Num. xxi. 9; but -not an allusion to it occurs anywhere, till now--some eight centuries -later--we are told that up to this time the children of Israel had -been in the habit of burning incense to it! Comparing Num. xxi. 4, -with xxxiii. 42, we find that the scene of the serpent-plague of the -Exodus was either Zalmonah ("the place of the image") or Punon, which -Bochart connects with Phainoi, a place mentioned as famous for -copper-mines.[487] Moses, for unknown reasons, chose it as an innocent -and potent symbol; but obviously in later days it subserved, or was -mingled with, the tendency to ophiolatry, which has been fatally -common in all ages in many heathen lands. It is indeed most difficult -to understand a state of things in which the children of Israel -habitually _burned incense_ to this venerable relic, nor can we -imagine that this was done without the cognisance and connivance of -the priests. Ewald makes the conjecture that the brazen _Saraph_ had -been left at Zalmonah, and was an occasional object of Israelite -adoration in pilgrimage for the purpose. There is, however, nothing -more extraordinary in the prevalence of serpent-worship among the Jews -than in the fact that, "in the cities of Judah and the streets of -Jerusalem, we" (the Jews), "and our fathers, our kings, and our -princes, burnt incense unto the Queen of Heaven."[488] If this were -the case, the serpent may have been brought to Jerusalem in the -idolatrous reign of Ahaz. It shows an intensity of reforming zeal, and -an inspired insight into the reality of things, that Hezekiah should -not have hesitated to smash to pieces so interesting a relic of the -oldest history of his people, rather than see it abused to idolatrous -purposes.[489] Certainly, in conduct so heroic, and hatred of idolatry -so strong, the Puritans might well find sufficient authority for -removing from Westminster Abbey the images of the Virgin, which, in -their opinion, had been worshipped, and before which lamps had been -perpetually burned. If we can imagine an English king breaking to -pieces the shrine of the Confessor in the Abbey, or a French king -destroying the sacred ampulla of Rheims or the _goupillon_ of St. -Eligius, on the ground that many regarded them with superstitious -reverence, we may measure the effect produced by this startling act of -Puritan zeal on the part of Hezekiah. - -"And he called it _Nehushtan_." If this rendering--in which our A.V. and -R.V. follow the LXX. and the Vulgate--be correct, Hezekiah justified the -iconoclasm by a brilliant play of words.[490] The Hebrew words for "a -serpent" (_nachash_) and for brass (_nechosheth_) are closely akin to -each other; and the king showed his just estimate of the relic which had -been so shamefully abused by contemptuously designating it--as it was in -itself and apart from its sacred historic associations--"nehushtan," a -thing of brass. The rendering, however, is uncertain, for the phrase may -be impersonal--"one" or "they" called it Nehushtan[491]--in which case -the assonance had lost any ironic connotation.[492] - -For this act of purity of worship, and for other reasons, the -historian calls Hezekiah the best of all the kings of Judah, superior -alike to all his predecessors and all his successors. He regarded him -as coming up to the Deuteronomic ideal, and says that therefore "the -Lord was with him, and he prospered whithersoever he went forth." - -The date of this great reformation is rendered uncertain by the -impossibility of ascertaining the exact order of Isaiah's prophecies. -The most probable view is that it was gradual, and some of the king's -most effective measures may not have been carried out till after the -deliverance from Assyria. It is clear, however, that the wisdom of -Hezekiah and his counsellors began from the first to uplift Judah from -the degradation and decrepitude to which it had sunk under the reign of -Ahaz. The boy-king found a wretched state of affairs at his accession. -His father had bequeathed to him "an empty treasury, a ruined peasantry, -an unprotected frontier, and a shattered army";[493] but although he was -still the vassal of Assyria, he reverted to the ideas of his -great-grandfather Uzziah. He strengthened the city, and enabled it to -stand a siege by improving the water-supply. Of these labours we have, -in all probability, a most interesting confirmation in the inscription -by Hezekiah's engineers, discovered in 1880, on the rocky walls of the -subterranean tunnel (_siloh_) between the spring of Gihon and the Pool -of Siloam.[494] He encouraged agriculture, the storage of produce, and -the proper tendance of flocks and herds, so that he acquired wealth -which dimly reminded men of the days of Solomon. - -There is little doubt that he early meditated revolt from Assyria; for -renewed faithfulness to Jehovah had elevated the moral tone, and -therefore the courage and hopefulness, of the whole people. The -Forty-Sixth Psalm, whatever may be its date, expresses the invincible -spirit of a nation which in its penitence and self-purification began -to feel itself irresistible, and could sing:-- - - "God is our hope and strength, - A very present help in trouble. - Therefore will we not fear, though the earth be moved, - Though the hills be carried into the midst of the sea. - There is a river, the streams whereof make glad the city of - God, - The Holy City where dwells the Most High. - God is in the midst of her; therefore shall she not be - shaken: - God shall help her, and that right early. - Heathens raged and kingdoms trembled: - He lifted His voice--the earth melted away. - Jehovah of Hosts is with us; - Elohim of Jacob is our refuge."[495] - -It was no doubt the spirit of renewed confidence which led Hezekiah to -undertake his one military enterprise--the chastisement of the -long-troublesome Philistines. He was entirely successful. He not only -won back the cities which his father had lost,[496] but he also -dispossessed them of their own cities, even unto Gaza, which was their -southernmost possession--"from the tower of the watchman to the fenced -city."[497] There can be no doubt that this act involved an almost open -defiance of the Assyrian King; but if Hezekiah dreamed of independence, -it was essential for him to be free from the raids and the menace of a -neighbour so dangerous as Philistia, and so inveterately hostile. It is -not improbable that he may have devoted to this war the money which -would otherwise have gone to pay the tribute to Shalmaneser or Sargon, -which had been continued since the date of the appeal of Ahaz to -Tiglath-Pileser II. When Sargon applied for the tribute Hezekiah refused -it, and even omitted to send the customary present. - -It is clear that in this line of conduct the king was following the -exhortations of Isaiah. It showed no small firmness of character that -he was able to choose a decided course amid the chaos of contending -counsels. Nothing but a most heroic courage could have enabled him, at -any period of his reign, to defy that dark cloud of Assyrian war which -ever loomed on the horizon, and from which but little sufficed to -elicit the destructive lightning-flash. - -There were three permanent parties in the Court of Hezekiah, each -incessantly trying to sway the king to its own counsels, and each -representing those counsels as indispensable to the happiness, and -even to the existence, of the State. - -I. There was the Assyrian party, urging with natural vehemence that -the fierce northern king was as irresistible in power as he was -terrible in vengeance. The fearful cruelties which had been committed -at Beth-Arbel, the devastation and misery of the Trans-Jordanic -tribes, the obliteration and deportation of the heavily afflicted -districts of Zebulon, Naphtali, and the way of the sea in Galilee of -the nations, the already inevitable and imminent destruction of -Samaria and her king and the whole Northern Kingdom, together with -that certain deportation of its inhabitants of which the fatal policy -had been established by Tiglath-Pileser, would constitute weighty -arguments against resistance. Such considerations would appeal -powerfully to the panic of the despondent section of the community, -which was only actuated, as most men are, by considerations of -ordinary political expediency. The foul apparition of the Ninevites, -which for five centuries afflicted the nations, is now only visible to -us in the bas-reliefs and inscriptions unearthed from their burnt -palaces. There they live before us in their own sculptures, with their -"thickset, sensual figures," and the expression of calm and settled -ferocity on their faces, exhibiting a frightful nonchalance as they -look on at the infliction of diabolical atrocities upon their -vanquished enemies. But in the eighth century before Christ they were -visible to all the eastern world in the exuberance of the most brutal -parts of the nature of man. Men had heard how, a century earlier, -Assurnazipal boasted that he had "dyed the mountains of the Nairi with -blood like wool"; how he had flayed captive kings alive, and dressed -pillars with their skins; how he had walled up others alive, or -impaled them on stakes; how he had burnt boys and girls alive, put out -eyes, cut off hands, feet, ears, and noses, pulled out the tongues of -his enemies, and "at the command of Assur his god" had flung their -limbs to vultures and eagles, to dogs and bears. The Jews, too, must -have realised with a vividness which is to us impossible the cruel -nature of the usurper Sargon. He is represented on his monuments as -putting out with his own hands the eyes of his miserable captives; -while, to prevent them from flinching when the spear which he holds in -his hand is plunged into their eye-sockets, a hook is inserted -through their nose and lips and held fast with a bridle. Can we not -imagine the pathos with which this party would depict such horrors to -the tremblers of Judah? Would they not bewail the fanaticism which led -the prophets to seduce their king into the suicidal policy of defying -such a power? To these men the sole path of national safety lay in -continuing to be quiet vassals and faithful tributaries of these -destroyers of cities and treaders-down of foes. - -II. Then there was the Egyptian party, headed probably by the powerful -Shebna, the chancellor.[498] His foreign name, the fact that his -father is not mentioned, and the question of Isaiah--"What hast thou -here? and whom hast thou here, that thou hast hewed thee out a -sepulchre here?"--seem to indicate that he was by birth a foreigner, -perhaps a Syrian.[499] The prophet, indignant at his powerful -interference with domestic politics, threatens him, in words of -tremendous energy, with exile and degradation.[500] He lost his place -of chancellor, and we next find him in the inferior, though still -honourable, office of secretary (_sopher_, 2 Kings xviii. 18), while -Eliakim had been promoted to his vacant place (Isa. xxii. 21). Perhaps -he may have afterwards repented, and the doom have been -lightened.[501] Circumstances at any rate reduced him from the -scornful spirit which seems to have marked his earlier opposition to -the prophetic counsels, and perhaps the powerful warning and menace of -Isaiah may have exercised an influence on his mind. - -III. The third party, if it could even be called a party, was that of -Isaiah and a few of the faithful, aided no doubt by the influence of -the prophecies of Micah. Their attitude to both the other parties was -antagonistic. - -i. As regards the Assyrian, they did not attempt to minimise the -danger. They represented the peril from the kingdom of Nineveh as -God's appointed scourge for the transgressions of Judah, as it had -been for the transgressions of Israel. - -Thus Micah sees in imagination the terrible march of the invader by -Gath, Akko, Beth-le-Aphrah, Maroth, Lachish, and Adullam. He plays with -bitter anguish on the name of each town as an omen of humiliation and -ruin, and calls on Zion to make herself bald for the children of her -delight, and to enlarge her baldness as the vultures, because they are -gone into captivity.[502] He turns fiercely on the greedy grandees, the -false prophets, the blood-stained princes, the hireling priests, the -bribe-taking soothsayers, who were responsible for the guilt which -should draw down the vengeance. He ends with the fearful prophecy--which -struck a chill into men's hearts a century later, and had an important -influence on Jewish history--"Therefore, because of you shall Zion be -ploughed as a field, and Jerusalem become ruins, and the hill of the -Temple as heights in the wood";--though there should be an ultimate -deliverance from Migdal-Eder, and a remnant should be saved.[503] - -Similar to Micah's, and possibly not uninfluenced by it, is Isaiah's -imaginary picture of the march of Assyria, which must have been full -of terror to the poor inhabitants of Jerusalem.[504] - - "He is come to Aiath! - He is passed through Migron! - At Michmash he layeth up his baggage: - They are gone over the pass: - 'Geba,' they cry, 'is our lodging.' - Ramah trembleth: - Gibeah of Saul is fled! - Raise thy shrill cries, O daughter of Gallim! - Hearken, O Laishah! Answer her, O Anathoth! - Madmenah is in wild flight (?). - The inhabitants of Gebim gather their stuff to flee. - This very day shall he halt at Nob. - He shaketh his hand at the mount of the daughter of Zion, - The hill of Jerusalem." - -Yet Isaiah, and the little band of prophets, in spite of their perils, -did _not_ share the views of the Assyrian party or counsel submission. -On the contrary, even as they contemplate in imagination this terrific -march of Sargon, they threaten Assyria. The Assyrian might smite Judah, -but God should smite the Assyrians. He boasts that he will rifle the -riches of the people as one robs the eggs of a trembling bird, which -does not dare to cheep or move the wing.[505] But Isaiah tells him that -he is but the axe boasting against the hewer, and the wooden staff -lifting itself up against its wielder. Burning should be scattered over -his glory. The Lord of hosts should lop his boughs with terror, and a -mighty one should hew down the crashing forest of his haughty Lebanon. - -ii. Still more indignant were the true prophets against those who -trusted in an alliance with Egypt. From first to last Isaiah warned -Ahaz, and warned Hezekiah, that no reliance was to be placed on -Egyptian promises--that Egypt was but like the reed of his own Nile. -He mocked the hopes placed on Egyptian intervention as being no less -sure of disannulment than a covenant with death and an agreement with -Sheol. This rebellious reliance on the shadow of Egypt was but the -weaving of an unrighteous web, and the adding of sin to sin. It should -lead to nothing but shame and confusion, and the Jewish ambassadors to -Zoan and Egypt should only have to blush for a people that could -neither help nor profit. And then branding Egypt with the old -insulting name of Rahab, or "Blusterer," he says,-- - - "Egypt helpeth in vain, and to no purpose. - Therefore have I called her 'Rahab, that sitteth still.'" - -Indolent braggart--that was the only designation which she deserved! -Intrigue and braggadocio--smoke and lukewarm water,--this was all -which could be expected from _her_![506] - -Such teaching was eminently distasteful to the worldly politicians, -who regarded faith in Jehovah's intervention as no better than -ridiculous fanaticism, and forgot God's wisdom in the inflated -self-satisfaction of their own. The priests--luxurious, drunken, -scornful--were naturally with them. Men were fine and stylish, and in -their religious criticisms could not express too lofty a contempt for -any one who, like Isaiah, was too sincere to care for the mere -polishing of phrases, and too much in earnest to shrink from -reiteration. In their self-indulgent banquets these sleek, smug -euphemists made themselves very merry over Isaiah's simplicity, -reiteration, and directness of expression. With hiccoughing insolence -they asked whether they were to be treated like weaned babes; and then -wagging their heads, as their successors did at Christ upon the cross, -they indulged themselves in a mimicry, which they regarded as witty, -of Isaiah's style and manner. With him they said it is all,-- - - "Tsav-la-tsav, tsav-la-tsav, - Quav-la-quav, quav-la-quav, - Z'eir sham, Z'eir sham!"-- - -which may be imitated thus:--With him it is always "Bit and bit, bid -and bid, for-bid and for-bid, for_bid_ and for_bid_, a lit-tle bit -here, a lit-tle bit there."[507] Monosyllable is heaped on -monosyllable; and no doubt the speakers tipsily adopted the tones of -fond mothers addressing their babes and weanlings. Using the Hebrew -words, one of these shameless roysterers would say, "_Tsav-la-tsav, -tsav-la-tsav, quav-la-quav, quav-la-quav, Z'eir sham, Z'eir -sham_,--that is how that simpleton Isaiah speaks." And then doubtless -a drunken laugh would go round the table, and half a dozen of them -would be saying thus, "_Tsav-la-tsav, tsav-la-tsav_," at once. They -derided Isaiah just as the philosophers of Athens derided St. Paul--as -a mere _spermologos_, "a seed-pecker!"[508] or "picker-up of -learning's crumbs." Is all this petty monosyllabism fit teaching for -persons like us? Are we to be taught by copybooks? Do we need the -censorship of this Old Morality? - -On whom, full of the fire of God, Isaiah turned, and told these -scornful tipsters, who lorded it over God's heritage in Jerusalem, -that, since they disdained his stammerings, God would teach them by -men of strange lips and alien tongue. They might mimic the style of -the Assyrians also if they liked; but they should fall backward, and -be broken, and snared, and taken.[509] - -It must not be forgotten that the struggle of the prophets against these -parties was far more severe than we might suppose. The politicians of -expediency had supporters among the leading princes. The priests--whom -the prophets so constantly and sternly denounce--adhered to them; and, -as usual, the women were all of the priestly party (comp. Isa. xxxii. -9-20). The king, indeed, was inclined to side with his prophet, but the -king was terribly overshadowed by a powerful and worldly aristocracy, of -which the influence was almost always on the side of luxury, idolatry, -and oppression. - -iii. But what had Isaiah to offer in the place of the policy of these -worldly and sacerdotal advisers of the king? It was the simple command -"Trust in the Lord." It was the threefold message "God is high; God -is near; God is Love."[510] Had he not told Ahaz not to fear the -"stumps of two smouldering torches," when Rezin and Pekah seemed -awfully dangerous to Judah? So he tells them now that, though their -sins had necessitated the rushing stroke of Assyrian judgment, Zion -should not be utterly destroyed. In Isaiah "the calmness requisite for -sagacity rose from faith." Mr. Bagehot might have appealed to Isaiah's -whole policy in illustration of what he has so well described as the -military and political benefits of religion. Monotheism is of -advantage to men not only "by reason of the high concentration of -steady feeling which it produces, but also for the mental calmness and -sagacity which surely springs from a pure and vivid conviction that -the Lord reigneth."[511] Isaiah's whole conviction might have been -summed up in the name of the king himself: "Jehovah maketh strong." - -King Hezekiah, apparently not a man of much personal force, though of -sincere piety, was naturally distracted by the counsels of these three -parties: and who can judge him severely if, beset with such terrific -dangers, he occasionally wavered, now to one side, now to the other? -On the whole, it is clear that he was wise and faithful, and deserves -the high eulogy that his faith failed not. Naturally he had not within -his soul that burning light of inspiration which made Isaiah so sure -that, even though clouds and darkness might lower on every side, God -was an eternal Sun, which flamed for ever in the zenith, even when not -visible to any eye save that of Faith. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[480] The first of these dates is highly uncertain, as is the entire -chronology of this reign. I follow Kittel. - -[481] 2 Chron. xxxi. 2-21. - -[482] Josiah did this many years later (2 Kings xxiii. 13). - -[483] Gen. xxxv. 14. See Spencer, _De legg. Hebr._, i. 444; Bochart, -_Canaan_, ii. 2. - -[484] Exod. xxiv. 4. Comp. Deut. vii. 5, xii. 3, xvi. 22; Lev. xxvi. -1; 2 Chron. xiv. 3, xxxi. 1; Jer. xliii. 13; Hos. x. 2; Mic. v. 13 -(where the A.V. often has "statue" or "image"). Comp. Clem. Alex., -_Strom._, i. 24; Arnob., _c. Gent._, i. 39. - -[485] The rendering "grove" in the A.V. is borrowed from the ἄλσος of -the LXX., and the _lucus_ of the Vulgate. On the connection of the -Asherah with the sacred tree of the Assyrian, see my article on -"Grove" in Smith's _Dict. of the Bible_; and Fergusson, _Nineveh and -Persepolis Restored_, 299-304. On the worship of Asherah, see 1 Kings -xv. 13; 2 Kings xxi. 3-7, xxiii. 4; 2 Chron. xv. 16; Judg. iii. 5-7, -vi. 25, xviii. 18. Baudissin in _Herzog Realencykl._, _s.v._ We may -well be startled by the prevalence of idolatry in Jerusalem revealed -in Isa. x. 11, xxvii. 9, xxix. 11, xxx. 9, 22, etc. - -[486] See Wellhausen, _Hist._, 235; Stade, _Gesch. d. V. I._, 460; W. -R. Smith, _Religion of the Semites_, 171; Cheyne, _Isaiah_, ii. 303; -Renan, _Hist. du Peuple d'Israel_, i. 230 (Prof. Driver, _Bibl. -Dict._, i. 258, 2nd edition). - -[487] _Hierozoicon_, ii. 3, § 13. - -[488] Jer. xliv. 17. In the collection of antiquities of Baron -Ustinoff at Jaffa are five or six dragon-headed serpents, with ears of -copper and hollow inside. They are ancient, and were perhaps used as -talismanic copies of Nehushtan. - -[489] If this was a genuine relic, it must have been nearly eight -hundred years old. It is never mentioned elsewhere. - -[490] נְחֻשׁתָּן, "a brazen thing." The king certainly showed a horror -of sacerdotal imposture and religious materialism. Yet Renan argues, -from Isa. x. 11, xxvii. 9, xxx. 9, 22, that he must have had a certain -amount of tolerance. See _Hist. du Peuple d'Israel_, iii. 30. - -[491] 2 Kings xviii. 4. _Vayyikra_ is like the English indefinite -plural. The impersonal rendering (as in other passages) is adopted in -the Targum of Jonathan, the Peshito, etc., and by Luther, Bunsen, -Ewald, and most moderns. - -[492] This relic is still shown in the Church of St. Ambrose at Milan. -It used to be the popular notion that it would hiss at the end of the -world. The history of the Milan "relic" is that a Milanese envoy to -the court of the Emperor John Zimisces at Constantinople chose it from -the imperial treasures, being assured that it was made of the same -metal that Hezekiah had broken up (Sigonius, _Hist. Regn. Ital._, -vii.). It is probably a symbol used by some ophite sect. See Dean -Plumptre, _Dict. of Bibl._, _s.v._ "Serpent." - -[493] 2 Kings xvi. 8; Driver, _Isaiah_, 68. - -[494] The diverting of the water-courses enabled him to bring the water -into the city by a subterranean tunnel. The Saracens took a similar -precaution (Gul. Tyr., viii. 7). See Appendix II., where the inscription -is given; and compare 2 Chron. xxxii. 30. Apparently it carried the -water of Gihon to the south-east gate, where were the king's gardens. -Ecclus. xlviii. 17: "Ezekias fortified his city, and brought in water -into the midst thereof: he digged the hard rock with iron, and made -wells for water." For "water" the MSS. read "Gog," a corruption probably -for ἀγωγὸν, "a conduit" (Geiger) or "Gihon" (Fritzsche). - -[495] Psalm xlvi. 1-11. - -[496] 2 Chron. xxviii. 18. - -[497] 2 Kings xviii. 8: comp. xvii. 9. Josephus says that he failed to -take Gath (_Antt._, IX. xiii. 3). - -[498] A.V., "treasurer" (_soken_; lit., "deputy" or "associate": Isa. -xxii. 15). He was "over the household." The Egyptian alliance had for -Judah, as Renan points out, some of the fascination that a Russian -alliance has often had for troubled spirits in France (_Hist. du -Peuple d'Israel_, iii. 12). - -[499] Renan says that he may have been a Sebennyite, and his name -Sebent. - -[500] Isa. xxii. 17, 18: "Behold, the Lord shall sling and sling, and -pack and pack, and toss and toss thee away like a ball into a distant -land; and there thou shalt die" (Stanley). The versions vary -considerably. - -[501] Isa. xxxvii. 2. There can be little doubt that there were not -_two_ Shebnas. - -[502] Mic. i. 10-16. See the writer's _Minor Prophets_ ("Men of the -Bible" Series), pp. 130-133, for an explanation of this enigmatic -prophecy. - -[503] Jer. xxvi. 8-24. He tells us that the prophecy was delivered in -the reign of Hezekiah. See my _Minor Prophets_, pp. 123-140. - -[504] Isa. x. 28-32. It would involve a cross-country route over -several deep ravines--_e.g._, the Wady Suweinit, near Michmash. In 1 -Sam. xiv. 2, Thenius, for "Migron," reads "the Precipice." Some take -Aiath for Ai, three miles south of Bethel. Renan says (_Hist. du -Peuple d'Israel_, iii.): "Nom d'Anathoth, arrangé symboliquement." - -[505] Isa. x. 14. The metaphor of a bird's nest occurs more than once -in the boastful Assyrian records. - -[506] Isa. xxx. 1-7. Rahab means "fierceness," "insolence." For the -various uses of the word, see Job xxvi. 12; Isa. li. 9, 10, 15; Psalm -lxxxix. 9, 10, lxxxvii. 4, 5. - -[507] See Dr. S. Cox (_Expositor_, i. 98-104) on Isa. xxviii. 7-13. - -[508] Acts xvii. 18. - -[509] Isa. xxviii. 7-22. - -[510] Professor Smith, _Isaiah_, i. 12. - -[511] Bagehot, _Physics and Politics_, p. 73; Smith, _Isaiah_, 109. - - - - - CHAPTER XXVI - - _HEZEKIAH'S SICKNESS, AND THE EMBASSY FROM - BABYLON_ - - 2 KINGS xx. 1-19 - - "Thou hast loved me out of the pit of nothingness."--ISA. xxxviii. - 17 (A.V., margin). - - "See the shadow of the dial - In the lot of every one - Marks the passing of the trial, - Proves the presence of the Sun." - E. B. BROWNING. - - -In the chaos of uncertainties which surrounds the chronology of King -Hezekiah's reign, it is impossible to fix a precise date to the -sickness which almost brought him to the grave. It has, however, been -conjectured by some Assyriologists that the story of this episode has -been displaced, because it seemed to break the continuity of the -narrative of the Assyrian invasion; and that, though it is placed in -the Book of Kings after the deliverance from Sennacherib, it really -followed the earlier incursion of Sargon. This is rendered more -probable by Isaiah's promise (2 Kings xx. 6), "I will deliver thee and -this city out of the hand of the King of Assyria," and by the fact -that Hezekiah still possessed such numerous and splendid treasures to -display to the ambassadors of Merodach-Baladan. This could hardly have -been the case after he had been forced to pay a fine to the King of -Assyria of all the silver that was found in the house of the Lord, and -in the treasures of the king's house, to cut off the gold from the -doors and pillars of the Temple, and even to send as captives to -Nineveh some of his wives, and of the eunuchs of his palace.[512] The -date "in those days" (2 Kings xx. 1) is vague and elastic, and may -apply to any time before or after the great invasion. - -He was sick unto death. The only indication which we have of the -nature of his illness is that it took the form of a carbuncle or -imposthume,[513] which could be locally treated, but which, in days of -very imperfect therapeutic knowledge, might easily end in death, -especially if it were on the back of the neck. The conjecture of -Witsius and others that it was a form of the plague which they suppose -to have caused the disaster to the Assyrian army has nothing whatever -to recommend it. - -Seeing the fatal character of his illness, Isaiah came to the king -with the dark message, "Set thine house in order; for thou shalt die, -and not live." - -The message is interesting as furnishing yet another proof that even -the most positive announcements of the prophets were, and were always -meant to be, to some extent hypothetical and dependent on unexpressed -conditions. This was the case with the famous prophecy of Micah that -Zion should be ploughed down into a heap of ruins. It was never -fulfilled; yet the prophet lost none of his authority, for it was well -understood that the doom which would otherwise have been carried out -had been averted by timely penitence. - -But the message of Isaiah fell with terrible anguish on the heart of -the suffering king. He had hoped for a better fate. He had begun a -great religious reformation. He had uplifted his people, at least in -part, out of the moral slough into which they had fallen in the days -of his predecessor. He had inspired into his threatened capital -something of his own faith and courage. Surely he, if any man, might -claim the old promises which Jehovah in His loving-kindness and truth -had sworn to his father David and his father Abraham, that he being -delivered out of the hand of his enemies should serve God without -fear, walking in holiness and righteousness before Him all the days of -his life. He was but a young man still--perhaps not yet thirty years -old; further, not only would he leave behind him an unfinished work, -but he was childless,[514] and therefore it seemed as if with him -would end the direct line of the house of David, heir to so many -precious promises. He has left us--it is preserved in the Book of -Isaiah--the poem which he wrote on his recovery, but which enshrines -the emotion of his agonising anticipations[515]:-- - - "I said, In the noontide of my days I shall go into the gates of - Sheol. - I am deprived of the residue of my years. - I said, I shall not see Yah, Yah, in the land of the living, - I shall behold no man more, when I am among them that cease to be. - Mine habitation is removed, and is carried away from me like a - shepherd's tent. - Like a weaver I have rolled up my life; he will cut me from the - thrum. - - * * * * * - - Like a swallow or a crane, so did I chatter; - I did mourn as a dove; mine eyes fail with looking upward. - O Lord, I am oppressed; be Thou my surety." - -We must remember, as we contemplate his utter prostration of soul, -that he was not blessed, as we are, with the sure and certain hope of -the resurrection to eternal life. All was dim and dark, to him in the -shadowy world of _eidola_ beyond the grave, and many a century was to -elapse before Christ brought life and immortality to light. To enter -Sheol meant to Hezekiah to pass beyond the cheerful sunshine of earth -and the felt presence of God. No more worship, no more gladness there! - - "For Sheol cannot praise Thee, Death cannot celebrate Thee; - They that go down into the pit cannot hope for Thy truth." - -On every ground, therefore, the feelings of Hezekiah, had he not been a -worshipper of God, might have been like those of Mycerinus, and, like -that legendary Egyptian king, he might have cursed God before he died. - - "My father loved injustice, and lived long; - I loved the good he scorned and hated wrong-- - The gods declare my recompense to-day. - I looked for life more lasting, rule more high; - And when six years are measured, lo, I die! - Yet surely, O my people, did I ween - Man's justice from the all-just gods was given, - A light that from some upper point did beam, - Some better archetype whose seat was heaven: - A light that, shining from the blest abodes, - Did shadow somewhat of the life of gods." - -The indignation of Mycerinus often finds an echo on Pagan tombstones, -as in the famous epitaph on the grave of the girl Procope:-- - - "I, Procope, lift up my hands against the gods, - Who took me hence undeserving, - Aged nineteen years." - -It was far otherwise with Hezekiah. There was anguish in his heart, -but no rebellion or defiance. He wept sore; he turned his face to the -wall and wept;[516] but as he wept he also prayed, and said,-- - -"O Lord, remember now how I have walked before Thee in truth, and with -a perfect heart, and have done that which is good in Thy sight." - -Isaiah, after delivering his dark message, and doubtless adding to it -such words of human consolation as were possible--if under such -circumstances any were possible--had left the king's chamber. On every -ground his feelings must have been almost as overwhelmed with sorrow as -those of the king. Hezekiah was personally his friend, and the hope of -his nation. Doubtless the prophet's prayers rose as fervently and as -effectually as those of Luther, which snatched his friend Melanchthon -back from the very gates of death. By the time that he had reached the -middle of the court,[517] he felt borne in upon him, by that Divine -intuition which constituted his prophetic call, the certainty that God -would withdraw the immediate doom which he had been commissioned to -announce. It has been conjectured by some that the conviction was -deepened in his mind by observing on the steps of Ahaz one of those -remarkable but rare effects of refraction--or, as some have conjectured, -of a solar eclipse, involving an obscuration of the upper limb of the -sun--which had seemed to take the advancing shadow ten steps backwards; -and that this was to him a sign from heaven of the promise of God and -the prolongation of the king's life. Awestruck and glad, he hastened -back into the presence of the dying king with the life-giving message -that God had heard his prayer, and seen his tears, and would add fifteen -years to his life, and would defend him, and deliver him and Jerusalem -out of the hand of the King of Assyria. And this should be the sign to -him from Jehovah--Jehovah would bring again the shadow ten steps up the -stairs of Ahaz. To this sign--if it was visible from the -chamber-window--he called the attention of the astonished king.[518] - -We here naturally follow the narrative of Isaiah himself, as more -authoritative than that of the historian of the Kings as to details in -which they differ.[519] Not only is it quite in accordance with all -that we know of history that slight variations should occur in the -traditions of long-past times, but the text of the Book of Kings -suggests some difficulty. There we read that Hezekiah asked Isaiah -what should be the sign of the promise--not mentioned in Isaiah--that -he should go up to the House of the Lord the third day. Isaiah then -asked him whether the sign should be that the shadow should advance -ten steps, or recede ten steps. But there is no interrogation in the -Hebrew, which rather means, "The shadow hath advanced ten steps ... if -it shall recede ten steps?" or if we insert the interrogation in the -first clause, "Hath the shadow advanced ten steps?"[520] The king's -natural answer to so strange an alternative would be that for the -shadow to advance ten steps was nothing; whereas its retrogression -would be a sign indeed. Then Isaiah cried unto Jehovah, and the shadow -went backward. In the obvious divergence of details we naturally -follow Isaiah himself; and if it be a true and understood rule of all -theology, "_Miracula non sunt multiplicanda præter necessitatem_," the -miracle in this case--in the opportuneness of its occurrence, and the -issues which it inspired--was none the less a miracle because it was -carried out in direct accordance with God's unseen, perpetual, -miraculous Providence, which none but unbelievers will nickname -Chance. That we are here dealing with an historic incident is certain; -and they who see and acknowledge God in all history find no difficulty -at all in seeing His dealings with men in striking interpositions. But -these, by the analogy of His whole Divine economy, would naturally be -out in accordance with natural laws. - -The words rendered "the sun-dial of Ahaz" mean no more than "the steps -[_ma'aloth_] of Ahaz." Ahaz evidently was a king of æsthetic tastes, -who was fond of introducing foreign novelties and curiosities into -Jerusalem.[521] Steps, with a staff on the top of them as a gnomon, to -serve as sun-dials had been invented at Babylon, and Ahaz may probably -have become acquainted with their form and use when he paid his visit to -Tiglath-Pileser at Damascus. No one could blame him--it was indeed a -meritorious act--to introduce to his people so useful an invention. The -word "hour" first occurs in Dan. iii. 6, and it was doubtless from -Babylon that the Hebrews borrowed the division of days into hours. This -is the earliest instance in the Bible of the mention of any instrument -to measure time. That the recession of the shadow could be caused by -refraction is certain, for it has been observed in modern days. Thus, as -is mentioned by Rosenmüller, on March 27th, 1703, Père Romauld, prior of -the monastery at Metz, noticed that the shadow on his dial deviated an -hour and a half, owing to refraction in the higher regions of the -atmosphere.[522] Or again, according to Mr. Bosanquet, the same effect -might have been produced by the darkening shadow of an eclipse. But -while he appealed to Divine indications the great prophet did not -neglect natural remedies. He ordered that a cake of figs should be laid -on the imposthume. It was a recognised and an efficient remedy, still -recommended, centuries later, by Dioscorides, by Pliny, and by St. -Jerome. By God's blessing on man's therapeutic care, the king was -speedily rescued from the gates of death. Constantly in Scripture what -we call the miraculous and what we call the providential are mingled -together. To those who regard the providential as a constant miracle, -the question of the miraculous becomes subordinate.[523] - -With intense joy and gratitude the king hailed the respite which God -had granted him. In fifteen years much might be done, much might be -hoped for. All this he acknowledged with deep feeling in the song -which he wrote on his recovery. - - "I shall go as in solemn procession[524] all my years because of the - bitterness of my soul. - O Lord, by these things men live, - And wholly therein is the life of my spirit. - Behold, it was for my peace that I had great bitterness; - But Thou hast loved my soul from the pit of nothingness: - For Thou hast cast all my sins behind Thy back. - - * * * * * - - The Lord is ready to save me; - Therefore will we sing my songs to the stringed instruments - All the days of our life in the house of the Lord."[525] - -"The wonder done in the land" was, according to the Chronicler, one of -the grounds for the embassy which, after his recovery, Hezekiah -received from Merodach-Baladan, the patriot prince of Babylon. The -other ostensible object of the embassy was to send letters and a -present in congratulation for the king's restoration to health. But -the real object lay deeper, out of sight. It was to secure a southern -alliance for Babylon against the incessant tyranny of Nineveh. - -Merodach-Baladan is mentioned in the inscriptions of Sargon.[526] He -is described as "Merodach-Baladan, son of Baladan, King of Sumîr and -Accad, king of the four countries, and conqueror of all his enemies." -There had been long struggles, lasting indeed for centuries, between -the city on the Euphrates and the city on the Tigris. Sometimes one, -sometimes the other, had been victorious. Babylon--on the monuments -Kur-Dunyash--had its original Accadian name of Ca-dinirra, which, like -its Semitic equivalent Bal-el, means "Gate of God." Kalah (Larissa and -Birs Nimroud) had been built by Shalmaneser I. before B.C. 1300. His -son conquered Babylon, but not permanently; for in some later raid the -Babylonians got possession of his signet-ring, with its proud -inscription, "Conqueror of Kur-Dunyash," and it was not recovered by -the Assyrians till six centuries later, when it fell into the hands of -Sennacherib. About 1150 Nebuchadrezzar I. of Babylon thrice invaded -Assyria, but there was again peace and alliance in 1100. -Merodach-Baladan I. reigned before 900. The king who now sought the -friendship of Hezekiah was the second of the name. He seized or -recovered the throne of Babylon in 721, after the death of -Shalmaneser, perhaps because Sargon was a usurper of dubious descent. -He helped the Elamites against Assyria. Sargon was compelled to -retreat to Assyria, but returned in 712, and drove Merodach-Baladan to -flight. He was captured and taken to Assyria. But on the murder of -Sargon in 705, he again managed to seize the throne of Babylon, killed -the viceroy who had been set up, and became king for six months. After -this, Sennacherib invaded his country, defeated him, and drove him -once more to flight. He was perhaps killed by his successor. - -Whether his overtures to Hezekiah took place before his defeat by -Sargon, or after his escape, is uncertain. In either case he doubtless -sent a splendid embassy, for Babylon was far-famed for its golden -magnificence as "the glory of kingdoms" and "the beauty of the -Chaldees' excellency."[527] At that time the Jews knew but little of -the far-off city which was destined to be so closely interwoven with -their future fortunes, as it was mingled with their oldest and dimmest -traditions.[528] Apart from the magnificence of the presents brought -to him, it was not unnatural that Hezekiah should regard this embassy -with intense satisfaction. It was flattering to the power of his -little kingdom that its alliance should be sought by the far-off and -powerful capital on the great river;[529] it was still more -encouraging to know that the frightful Nineveh had a strong enemy not -far from her own frontier. Merodach-Baladan's ambassadors would be -sure to inform Hezekiah that their lord had flung off the authority of -Sargon, had kept him at bay for many years, and was still the -undisputed king of the dominions snatched from the common enemy. It -might have seemed reasonable that Hezekiah, for his part, should -desire to leave the most favourable impression of his wealth and power -on the mind of his distant and magnificent ally. He "hearkened unto" -the ambassadors, or, more properly, "he was glad of them" (R.V.),[530] -and "showed them all the house of his spicery and other treasures, his -precious unguents, his armoury, his bullion, plate, and the whole -resources of his kingdom." The Chronicler regards this as ingratitude -to God. He says that "Hezekiah rendered not again according unto the -benefits done unto him; for his heart was lifted up: therefore there -was wrath upon him, and upon Judah and Jerusalem." It is a severe -judgment of later times, and the historian of the Kings pronounces no -such censure. Nevertheless, he records the stern sentence pronounced -by Isaiah. The prophet had seen through the secret diplomacy of the -Babylonian ambassadors, and knew that the real object of their mission -was to induce his king to revolt against Assyria in reliance on an arm -of flesh. He came to ask Hezekiah whose these men were, whence they -came, and what they had said. The king told him who they were, and how -he had received them; but he did not think it wise to reveal their -secret proposals. If Isaiah had so vehemently reproved all -negotiations with Egypt, there was little probability that he would -sanction the overtures of Babylon. He saw in Hezekiah's conduct a vein -of ostentatious elation, a swerving from theocratic faith; and with -remarkable prophetic insight convinced the king of the error and -impolicy of his proceedings, by announcing that the final and, in -fact, irrevocable captivity of Judah would ultimately come, not from -Nineveh, the fierce enemy, whose cloud of war was lurid on the -horizon, but from Babylon, the apparently weaker friend, who was now -making overtures of amity. With what heartrending grief must the king -have heard the doom that the display of his treasures would prove to -be in the future an incentive to the cupidity of the kings of Babylon, -and that they would sweep away all those precious things to the banks -of the Euphrates with such final overthrow that even the descendants -of David should be sunk to the infinite degradation of being eunuchs -in the palace of the King of Babylon.[531] The doom seems to have been -fulfilled in part in the reign of Hezekiah's son, and more fearfully -in the days of his great-grandchildren.[532] - -The king's pride was humbled to the dust. In the spirit of Job--"The -Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the -Lord"[533]--he resigned himself without a murmur to the will of -Heaven, and exclaimed that all which God did must be well done. At -least God granted him a respite. Peace and truth would be in his own -days; for that let him be thankful. They were words of humble -resignation, uttered by one who had learnt to believe that whatever -God decreed was just and right. - -It would be unjust to measure the feelings of those far centuries by -those of our own day, and there was none of the gross selfishness in -the words of Hezekiah which led Nero to quote the line-- - - "When I am dead, let earth be mixed with fire"; - -or which led Louis XIV. to say-- - - "Après moi le déluge." - -We may perhaps trace in his exclamation something of the fatalism -which gives a touch of apathy to the submissiveness of the Oriental. -Some, too, have imagined that his distress was tinged by a gleam of -happiness at the implicit promise that he should have a son. His -wife's name was Hephzibah ("My delight is in her"), and within two -years she brought forth the firstborn son, whose career, indeed, was -dark and evil, but who became in due time an ancestor of the promised -Messiah. The name "Manasseh" given him by his parents recalled the -child born to Joseph in the land of his exile who had caused him to -forget his sorrows.[534] Hezekiah had the spirit which says,-- - - "That which Thou blessest is most good, - And unblest good is ill; - And all is right which seems most wrong, - So it be Thy sweet will." - - -FOOTNOTES: - -[512] One of the first to point out the _necessary_ rearrangement of -the events of Hezekiah's reign was Dr. Hincks, in his paper on "A -Rectification of Chronology which the newly discovered Apis-stêlês -render necessary" (_Journ. of Sacred Lit._, October 1858). See my -article on Hezekiah, Smith, _Dict. of the Bible_, 2nd ed., ii. 1251. - -[513] Heb., _sh'chîn_; LXX., ἕλκος; Vulg., _ulcus_. - -[514] The Rabbis even make his sickness the punishment for his having -neglected to secure an heir. He pleads that he foresaw the wickedness -of his son. Isaiah tells him not to try to forestall God (_Berachoth_, -f. 10, 1). - -[515] Isa. xxxviii. 10-20. - -[516] Comp. 1 Kings xxi. 4 (Ahab). - -[517] 2 Kings xx. 4. The _Q'rî_ or "read" text is, as here rendered, -_chatsee_ (comp. 1 Kings vii. 8), and is followed by the LXX. ( ἐν τῇ -αὐλῇ τῇ μέσῃ), by the Vulgate (_mediam partem atrii_), and by the A.V. -The R.V., which adopts the Kethîb or written text, _ha'îr_, renders it -"the middle part of the city." If this be the true reading, it would -mean that Isaiah had gone some distance from the palace, and was now -perhaps in the Valley between the Upper and the Lower City. But it -seems not improbable that (1) "the steps of Ahaz" would be in the -royal court, and (2) the answer of God, like the mercy of Christ to -the suffering, may have come promptly as an echo to the appealing cry. - -[518] The LXX. calls "the stairs" ἀναβαθμοὺς τοῦ οἴκου τοῦ πατρός σου, -and so, too, Josephus (_Antt._, X. ii. 1). The Targum calls them "an -hour-stone." Symmachus has, στρέψω τὴν σκίαν τῶν γραμμῶν ἥ κατέβη ἐν -ὡρολογίῳ Ἀχάζ. - -[519] It should, however, be observed that on the question of priority -critics are divided. Grotius, Vitringa, Paulus, Drechsler, etc., -thought that the account in the Book of Isaiah is the original; De -Wette, Maurer, Koster, Winer, Driver, etc., regard that account as a -later abbreviation, perhaps from a common source. - -[520] See Professor Lumby, _ad loc._ - -[521] There is an exactly similar sun-dial not far from Delhi. - -[522] _Journ. of Asiatic Soc._, xv. 286-293. - -[523] Figs have a recognised use for imposthumes. See Dioscorides and -Pliny quoted in Celsius, _Hierobot._, ii. 373. In the passage of -_Berachoth_ quoted above, Hezekiah in his sickness asks Isaiah to give -him his daughter in marriage, that he may have an heir. Isaiah replies -that the decree of his death is irrevocable. The king bids Isaiah -depart, and says (quoting Job xiii. 15) that a man must not despair, -even if a sword is laid on his neck. - -[524] Comp. Psalm xlii. 4. - -[525] Isa. xxxviii. 10-20. - -[526] The Babylonian form of his name is Marduk-habal-iddi-na--_i.e._, -"Merodach gave a son." He is the Mardokempados of the _Ptolemaic -Canon_, and the second fragment of his reign (six months) is mentioned -by Polyhistor (_ap._ Euseb.). Josephus calls him Baladan (_Antt._, X. -ii. 2). He was originally the prince of the Chaldæan _Bit Yakîm_. -Sargon calls him "Merodach-Baladan, the foe, the perverse, who, -contrary to the will of the great gods, ruled as king at Babylon." He -displaced him for a time by "Belibus, the son of a wise man, whom one -had reared like a little dog" (as we might say "like a tame cat") "in -my palace" (Schrader, ii. 32). In the Assyrian records he is often -called (by mistake?) "the son of Yakim." For the adventures of the -Babylonian hero, see Schrader, _K. A. T._, 213 ff., 224 ff., 227, and -in Riehm, _Handwörterbuch_, ii. 982. - -[527] Isa. xiv. 4, xiii. 19. - -[528] Gen. x. 10, 11, xi. 1-9. - -[529] Jos., _Antt._, X. ii. 2: Σύμμαχόν τε αὐτὸν εἶναι παρεκάλει καὶ -φίλον. - -[530] 2 Kings xx. 13. LXX., ἐχάρη. - -[531] See Dan. i. 6. - -[532] 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11. - -[533] Job i. 21. - -[534] Manasseh seems to mean "one who forgets." See Gen. xli. 51. It -was the name of the husband of Judith (Judith viii. 2), and is found -in Ezra x. 30, 33. - - - - - CHAPTER XXVII - - _HEZEKIAH AND ASSYRIA_ - - B.C. 701 - - 2 KINGS xviii. 13--xix. 37. - - Ἀλλ' ὁ σοφώτατος βασιλεὺς οὐχ ὅπλα ταῖς ἐκείνων βλασφημίαις, ἀλλὰ - προσευχὴν καὶ δάκρυα καὶ σάκκον ἀντέταξεν.--THEODORET. - - "When, sudden--how think ye the end? - Did I say 'without friend'? - Say rather from marge to blue marge - The whole sky grew his targe, - With the sun's self for visible boss, - While an Arm ran across - Which the earth heaved beneath like a breast, - Where the wretch was safe pressed." - BROWNING. - - -Although during a few memorable scenes the relations of Judah with -Assyria in the reign of Hezekiah leap into fierce light, many previous -details are unfortunately left in the deepest obscurity--an obscurity -all the more impenetrable from the lack of certain dates. It will -perhaps help to simplify our conceptions if we first sketch what is -known of Assyria from the cuneiform inscriptions, and then fill up the -sketch of those scenes which are more minutely delineated in the Book -of Kings and in the prophecies of Isaiah. - -Sargon--perhaps a successful general of royal blood, though he never -calls himself the son of any one[535]--seems to have usurped the -throne on the death of Shalmaneser IV., during the siege of Samaria in -B.C. 722. He took Samaria, deported its inhabitants, and repeopled it -from the Assyrian dominions. "In their place," he says, in his tablets -in the halls of his palace at Khorsabad, "I settled the men of -countries conquered [by my hand]."[536] In 720 he suppressed a futile -attempt at revolt, headed by a pretender named Yahubid, in Hamath, -which he reduced to "a heap of ruins." For some years after this he -was occupied mainly on his northern frontiers, but he tells us that -until 711 tribute continued to come in from Judah and Philistia. -Meanwhile, these terrified and oppressed feudatories, writhing under -the remorseless dominion of Nineveh, naturally began to listen to the -intrigues of Egypt, whose interest it was to create a bulwark between -herself and the invasion of the armies which were the abhorrence of -the world. Under the influence of Sabaco, which gave new strength and -unity to Egypt, she succeeded in seducing Ashdod from its allegiance -to Sargon. Sargon at once deposed Azuri, King of Ashdod, and put his -brother Ahimit in his place. The Ashdodites soon after deposed Ahimit, -and elected in his place Jaman, who was in alliance with Sabaco.[537] -This revolt was evidently favoured by Judah, Edom, and Moab; for -Sargon says that they, as well as the people of Philistia, "were -speaking treason." The rebellion was crushed by Sargon's -promptitude.[538] He tells his own tale thus:-- - -"In the wrath of my heart I did not divide my army, and I did not -diminish the ranks, but I marched against Ashdod with my warriors, -who did not separate themselves from the traces of my sandals. I -besieged, I took Ashdod and Gunt-Asdodim. I then re-established these -towns. I placed [in them] the people whom my arms had conquered, I put -over them my lieutenant as governor. I regarded them as Assyrians, and -they practised obedience."[539] - -Sargon does not, however, seem to have conducted this campaign in -person; for we read in Isa. xx. 1 that he sent his Turtan--_i.e._, his -commander-in-chief,[540] whose name seems to have been Zir-bâni--to -Ashdod, who fought against it and took it. The wretched Philistines -had put their trust in Sabaco. "The people," says Sargon, "and their -evil chiefs sent their presents to Pharaoh, King of Egypt, a prince -who could not save them, and besought his alliance." Isaiah had for -three years been indicating how vain this policy was by one of those -acted parables which so powerfully affect the Eastern mind. He had, by -the word of the Lord, stripped the shoes from on his feet and the -upper robe of sackcloth from his loins, and walked, "naked and -barefoot, for a sign and portent against Egypt and Ethiopia," to -indicate that even thus should the people of Egypt and Ethiopia be -carried away as captives, naked and barefoot, by the kings of Assyria. -Egypt was the boast of one party at Jerusalem, and Ethiopia, which had -now become master of Egypt under Sabaco, was their expectation; but -Isaiah's public self-humiliation showed how utterly their hopes -should come to nought.[541] Before the outbreak at Ashdod, Sargon had -suppressed a revolt of Hanun, or Hanno, King of Gaza, and Egypt and -Assyria first met face to face at Raphia (about B.C. 720), where -Sabaco fought in person with an Egyptian contingent, at a spot -half-way between Gaza and the "river of Egypt."[542] Sabaco, whom -Sargon calls "the Sultan of Egypt" (Siltannu Muzri), had been -defeated, and fled precipitately, but Sargon was not then sufficiently -free from other complications to advance to the Nile. The hoarded -vengeance of Assyria was inflicted upon Egypt nearly a century later -by Esarhaddon and Assurbanipal. - -In the two suppressions of revolt at Ashdod, Sargon or his Turtan must -have come perilously near Jerusalem, and perhaps he may have inflicted -sufficient damage to admit of the boast that he had "conquered" Judæa. -If so, his military vanity made him guilty of an exaggeration. - -Far more serious to Sargon was the revolt of Merodach-Baladan, King of -Chaldæa. Babylon had always been a rival of Nineveh in the competition -for world-wide dominion, and for twelve years, as Sargon says, -Merodach-Baladan had been "sending ambassadors"[543]--to Hezekiah among -others--in the patient effort to consolidate a formidable league. Elam -and Media were with him; and at a solemn banquet, for which they had -"spread the carpets,"[544] and eaten and drank, the cry had risen, -"Arise, ye princes! anoint the shield." Standing in ideal vision on his -watch-tower, Isaiah saw the sweeping rush of the Assyrian troops on -their horses and camels on their way to Babylon. What should come of it? -The answer is in the words, "Fallen, fallen is Babylon, and all the -images of her gods he [Sargon] hath broken to the ground." Alas! there -is no hope from Babylon or its embassy! Would that Isaiah could have -held out a hope! But no, "O my threshed one, son of my threshing-floor, -that which I have heard from the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel, that -have I declared unto you."[545] And so it came to pass. The brave -Babylonian was defeated. In 709 Sargon occupied his palace, took -Dur-yakin, to which he had fled for refuge, and made himself Lord -Paramount as far as the Persian Gulf. It was his last great enterprise. -He built and adorned his palaces, and looked forward to long years of -peace and splendour; but in 705 the dagger-thrust of an assassin--a -malcontent of the town of Kullum--found its way to his heart; and -Sennacherib reigned in his stead. - -Sennacherib--Sin-ahi-irba ("Sin, the moon-god, has multiplied -brothers")[546]--was one of the haughtiest, most splendid, and most -powerful of all the kings of Assyria, though the petty state of Judah, -relying on her God, defied and flouted him. The son of a mighty -conqueror, at the head of a magnificent army, he regarded himself as -the undisputed lord of the world.[547] Born in the purple, and bred up -as crown prince, his primary characteristic was an overweening pride -and arrogance, which shows itself in all his inscriptions. He calls -himself "the Great King, the Powerful King, the King of the Assyrians, -of the nations of the four regions, the diligent ruler, the favourite -of the Great Gods, the observer of sworn faith, the guardian of law, -the establisher of monuments, the noble hero, the strong warrior, the -first of kings, the punisher of unbelievers, the destroyer of wicked -men."[548] He was mighty both in war and peace. His warlike glories -are attested by Herodotus, by Polyhistor, by Abydenus, by Demetrius, -and by his own annals. His peaceful triumphs are attested by the great -palace which he erected at Nineveh, and the magnificent series of -sculptured slabs with which he adorned it; by his canals and -aqueducts, his gateways and embankments, his Bavian sculpture, and his -_stêlê_ at the Nahr-el-Kelb. He was a worthy successor of his father -Sargon, and of the second Tiglath-Pileser--active in his military -enterprises, indefatigable, persevering, full of resource.[549] - -On one of his bas-reliefs we see this magnificent potentate seated on -his throne, holding two arrows in his right hand, while his left -grasps the bow. A rich bracelet clasps each of his brawny arms. On his -head is the jewelled pyramidal crown of Assyria, with its embroidered -lappets. His dark locks stream down over his shoulders, and the long, -curled beard flows over his breast. His strongly marked, sensual -features wear an aspect of unearthly haughtiness. He is clad in -superbly broidered robes, and his throne is covered with rich -tapestries, and bas-reliefs of Assyrians or captives, who, like the -Greek caryatides, uphold its divisions with their heads and arms. - -Yet all this glory faded into darkness, and all this colossal pride -crumbled into dust. Sennacherib not only died, like his father, by -murder, but by the murderous hands of his own sons, and after the -shattering of all his immense pretensions--a defeated and dishonoured -man. - -One of his invasions of Judæa occupies a large part of the Scripture -narrative.[550] It was the fourth time of that terrible contact -between the great world-power which symbolised all that was tyrannic -and idolatrous, and the insignificant tribe which God had chosen for -His own inheritance. - -In the reign of Ahaz, about B.C. 732, Judah had come into collision -with Tiglath-Pileser II. - -Under Shalmaneser IV. and Sargon, the Northern Kingdom had ceased to -exist in 722. - -Under Sargon, Judah had been harassed and humbled, and had witnessed -the suppression of the Philistian revolt, and of the defeat of the -powerful Sabaco at Raphia about 720. - -Now came the fourth and most overwhelming calamity. If the patriots of -Jerusalem had placed any hopes in the disappearance of the ferocious -Sargon, they must speedily have recognised that he had left behind him -a no less terrible successor. - -Sennacherib reigned apparently twenty-four years (B.C. 705-681). On -his accession he placed a brother, whose name is unknown, on the -vice-regal throne of Babylon, and contented himself with the title of -King of the Assyrians. This brother was speedily dethroned by a -usurper named Hagisa, who only reigned thirty days, and was then slain -by the indefatigable Merodach-Baladan, who held the throne for six -months. He was driven out by Belibus, who had been trained "like a -little dog" in the palace of Nineveh,[551] but was now made King of -Sumîr and Accad--_i.e._, of Babylonia. Sennacherib entered the palace -of Babylon and carried off the wife of Merodach and endless spoil in -triumph, while Merodach fled into the land of Guzumman, and (like the -Duke of Monmouth) hid himself "among the marshes and reeds," where the -Assyrians searched for him for five days, but found no trace of him. -After three years (702-699) Belibus proved faithless, and Sennacherib -made his son Assur-nadin-sum viceroy of Babylon. - -His second campaign was against the Medes in Northern Elam. - -His third (701) was against the Khatti (the Hittites)--_i.e._, against -Phœnicia and Palestine.[552] He drove King Luli from Sidon "by the mere -terror of the splendour of my sovereignty," and placed Tubalu (_i.e._, -Ithbaal) in his place, and subdued into tributary districts Arpad, -Byblos, Ashdod, Ammon, Moab, and Edom, suppressing at the same time a -very abortive rising in Samaria. "All these brought rich presents and -kissed my feet." He also subdued Zidka, King of Askelon, from whom he -took Beth-Dagon, Joppa, and other towns. Padî, the King of Ekron, was a -faithful vassal of Assyria; he was therefore deposed by the revolting -Ekronites, and sent in chains into the safe custody of Hezekiah, who -"imprisoned him in darkness." The rebel states all relied on the -Egyptians and Ethiopians. Sennacherib fought against Egyptians and -Ethiopians, "in reliance upon Assur my God," at Altaqu (B.C. 701), and -claims to have defeated them, and carried off the sons and charioteers -of the King of Egypt, and the charioteers of the kings of Ethiopia.[553] -He then tells us that he punished Altaqu and Timnath.[554] He impaled -the rebels of Ekron on stakes all round the city. He restored Padî, and -made him a vassal. "Hezekiah [Chazaqiahu] of Judah, who had not -submitted to my yoke, the terror of the splendour of my sovereignty -overwhelmed. Himself as a bird in a cage, in the midst of Jerusalem, his -royal city, I shut up. The Arabians and his dependants, whom he had -introduced for the defence of Jerusalem, his royal city, together with -thirty talents of gold, eight hundred of silver, bullion, precious -stones, ivory couches and thrones, an abundant treasure, with his -daughters, his harem, and his attendants, I caused to be brought after -me to Nineveh. He sent his envoy to pay tribute and render homage." At -the same time, he overran Judæa, took forty-six fenced cities and many -smaller towns, "with laying down of walls, hewing about, and trampling -down," and carried off more than two hundred thousand captives with -their spoil. Part of Hezekiah's domains was divided among three -Philistine vassals who had remained faithful to Assyria. - -It was in the midst of this terrible crisis that Hezekiah had sent to -Sennacherib at Lachish his offer of submission, saying, "I have -offended; return from me; that which thou puttest upon me I will -bear."[555] The spoiling of the palace and Temple was rendered necessary -to raise the vast mulct which the Assyrian King required.[556] - -It is at Lachish--now Um-Lakis, a fortified hill in the Shephelah, -south of Jerusalem, between Gaza and Eleutheropolis--that we catch -another personal glimpse of the mighty oppressor. We see him depicted, -on his triumphal tablets, in the palace-chambers of Kouyunjik, -engaged in the siege; for the town offered a determined -resistance,[557] and required all the energies and all the trained -heroism of his forces. We see him next, carefully painted, seated on -his royal throne in magnificent apparel, with his tiara and bracelets, -receiving the spoils and captives of the city. The inscription says: -"Sennacherib, the mighty king, the king of the country of Assyria, -sitting on the throne of judgment at the entrance of the city of -Lakisha. I give permission for its slaughter." He certainly implied -that he took the city, but a doubt is thrown on this by 2 Chron. -xxxii. 1, which only says that "he _thought_ to win these cities"; and -the historian says (2 Kings xix. 8) that he "departed from Lachish." -Lachish was evidently a very strong city, and it is so depicted in the -palace-tablets at Kouyunjik. It had been fortified by Rehoboam, and -had furnished a refuge to the wretched Amaziah.[558] - -If Judah and Jerusalem had listened to the messages of Isaiah,[559] -they might have been saved the humiliating affliction which seemed to -have plunged the brief sun of their prosperity into seas of blood. He -had warned them incessantly and in vain. He had foretold their -present desolation, in which Zion should be like a woman seated on the -ground, wailing in her despair. He had taught them that formalism was -no religion, and that external rites did not win Jehovah's approval. -He had told them how foolish it was to put trust in the shadow of -Egypt, and had not shrunk from revealing the fearful consequences -which should follow the setting up of their own false wisdom against -the wisdom of Jehovah. Yet, intermingled with pictures of suffering, -and threats of a harvestless year, designed to punish the vanity and -display of their women, and the intimation--never actually -fulfilled--that even the palace and Temple should become "the joy of -wild asses, a pasture of flocks," he constantly implies that the -disaster would be followed by a mysterious, divine, complete -deliverance, and ultimately by a Messianic reign of joy and peace. -Night is at hand, he said, and darkness; but after the darkness will -come a brighter dawn. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[535] One legend of his birth resembles the finding of Moses in the -bulrushes. - -[536] Schrader, _K. A. T._, pp. 272-274; _Records of the Past_, vii. 28. - -[537] Smith, _Eponym Canon_, p. 130. - -[538] See Prof. Smith, _Isaiah_, p. 198. - -[539] _Records of the Past_, vii. 40. Sargon's words are, "The people -of Philistia, Judah, Edom, and Moab were speaking treason. The people -and their evil chiefs, to fight against me, unto _Pharaoh, the King of -Egypt, a monarch who could not save them_, their presents carried, and -besought his alliance" (G. Smith, _Assyrian Discoveries_, 290). - -[540] On the monuments called _Turtanu_, "Holder of power." See -Schrader in Riehm, _s.v._ - -[541] Raphia, or Ropeh, is on the borders of the desert. Asia beat -Africa in every encounter--at Raphia, at Altaqu, at Carchemish. The -impression of the seal of Shabak, attached to his capitulations with -Sargon, was found at Nineveh by Sir A. H. Layard, and is now in the -British Museum. Shabak died in 712. His son Shabatoh succeeded him in -Egypt, and his nephew(?) Tirhakah in Ethiopia. Sabaco's name assumes -many forms (LXX., Σηγώρ; Herod., ii. 137; Σαβακώς; Vulg., _Sua_). The -Egyptians called him Shaba(ka). - -[542] Isa. xx. 1-6. - -[543] Lenormant, _Les Premières Civilisations_, ii. 203; _Records of -the Past_, vii. 41-46. - -[544] Isa. xxi. 6, A.V., "Watch in the watch-tower." Hitzig, Cheyne, -"They spread the carpets." Much in this short oracle (xxi. 1-10) is -obscure. Isaiah seems, in denouncing the fate of Babylon, to mourn for -the ruin of the smaller states of which it was the prelude (G. Smith, -_Soc. of Bibl. Arch._, ii. 320 Kleinert, _Stud. u. Krit._, 1877 W. R. -Smith in _Enc. Brit._, _s.v._ "Isaiah"). - -[545] Isa. xxi. 10--_i.e._, "My people threshed and trodden"; LXX., ὁ -καταλελειμμένος καὶ οἱ ὀδυνώμενοι _Records of the Past_, vii. 47. - -[546] Herod., Σαναχάριβος; Jos., Σεναχήριβος. See Appendix I. Sin was -the moon-god; Merodach, the planet Jupiter; Adar, Saturn; Ishtai, -Venus; Nebo, Mercury; Nergal, Mars (Schrader, ii. 117). - -[547] Sargon seems to have been murdered in the palace of unparalleled -splendour which he built at Dur-Sharrukin ("The City of Sargon"). It -took him five years to build it with armies of workmen. Its halls, -opened by Botta, were the first Assyrian halls ever entered by a -modern's foot. It is strange that this greatest of Assyrian kings is -only mentioned once in the Bible (Isa. xx. 1). We owe to Assyriology -his restoration to his proper place in the annals of mankind. See -Ragozin, _Assyria_, 247-254. - -[548] Rawlinson, _Ancient Monarchies_, ii. 178. - -[549] Canon Rawlinson, _Kings of Israel and Judah_, 187. - -[550] On his own monuments this campaign, except its final catastrophe, -is narrated in four sections: (1) The subjugation of Phœnicia, and of -Philistine towns; (2) the conquest of King Zidka of Askelon; (3) the -defeat of Ekron, the restoration of their vassal king Padî to his -throne, and the defeat of Egypt at Altaqu; (4) the expedition against -Jerusalem (Schrader, E. Tr., i. 298). See Appendix I. - -[551] This allusion is said to be the only instance of humour--"_grim_ -humour, or it would not be Assyrian"--which occurs in the Assyrian -annals. - -[552] Schrader, pp. 234-279. The account of the memorable campaign is -narrated in duplicate on the Taylor Cylinder in the British Museum, -and on the Bull Inscription at Kouyunjik. - -[553] Sennacherib calls Tirhakah's army "a host that no man could -number"; but it was defeated by the better discipline, the heavier -armour, and the superior physical strength of the Assyrians. - -[554] See Josh. xix. 43. - -[555] This very phrase "I imposed on them" is found on Sennacherib's -monument (Schrader, ii. 1). The references, when not otherwise -specified, are to Whitehouse's English translation. - -[556] In 2 Kings xviii. 16 the word "pillars" or "doorposts" is -uncertain. LXX., ἐστηριγμένα; Vulg., _laminas auri_. - -[557] 2 Chron. xxxii. 9. He had to besiege it "with all his power." He -seems to have thought it even more important than Jerusalem, for he -superintended the siege in person (Layard, _Nineveh and Babylon_, 150; -_Monuments of Nineveh_, 2nd series, pl. 21). The ruined Tel of -Umm-el-Lakîs lies between the Wady Simsim and the Wady-el-Ahsy (Riehm). - -[558] See 2 Chron. xi. 9, xxv. 27; Jer. xxxiv. 7. The allusion to this -city in Micah (i. 13) is obscure: "O thou inhabitant of Lachish [swift -steed], bind the chariot to the swift steed: she is the beginning of -sin to the daughter of Zion: for the transgressions of Israel were -found in thee." This seems to imply that some form of idolatry had -come from Israel to Lachish, and from Lachish to Jerusalem. In -Sennacherib's picture of the city, foreign worship is represented as -going on in it (Layard, _Monuments of Nineveh_, Pls. 21 and 24; -Rawlinson, _Herodotus_, i. 477). - -[559] Isa. xxix., xxx., xxxi. - - - - - CHAPTER XXVIII - - _THE GREAT DELIVERANCE_ - - B.C. 701 - - 2 _Kings_ xix. 1-37 - - "There brake He the lightnings of the bow, the shield, the sword, - and the battle."--PSALM lxxvi. 3. - - "ᾠδὴ πρὸς τὸν Ασσύριον."--LXX. - - "And the might of the Gentile, unsmote by the sword, - Hath melted like snow at the glance of the Lord." - BYRON. - - "Vuolsi cosi colà dove si puote - Cio che si vuole: e più non dimandare." - DANTE. - - "Through love, through hope, through faith's transcendent dower, - We feel that we are greater than we know." - WORDSWORTH. - - "God shall help her, and that when the morning dawns."--PSALM - xlvi. 5. - - -In spite of the humble submission of Hezekiah, it is a surprise to learn -from Isaiah that Sennacherib--after he had accepted the huge fine and -fixed the tribute, and departed to subdue Lachish--broke his -covenant.[560] He sent his three chief officers--the Turtan, or -commander-in-chief, whose name seems to have been Belemurani;[561] the -Rabsaris, or chief eunuch;[562] and the Rabshakeh, or chief -captain[563]--from Lachish to Hezekiah, with a command of absolute, -unconditional surrender, to be followed by deportation. By this conduct -Sennacherib violated his own boast that he was "a keeper of treaties." -Yet it is not difficult to conjecture the reason for his change of plan. -He had found it no easy matter to subdue even the very minor fortress of -Lachish; how unwise, then, would it be for him to leave in his rear an -uncaptured city so well fortified as Jerusalem! He was advancing towards -Egypt. It was obviously a strategic error to spare on his route a -hostile and almost impregnable stronghold as a nucleus for the plans of -his enemies. Moreover, he had heard rumours that Tirhakah, the third and -last Ethiopian king of Egypt, was advancing against him, and it was most -important to prevent any junction between his forces and those of -Hezekiah.[564] He could not come in person to Jerusalem, for the siege -of Lachish was on his hands; but he detached from his army a large -contingent under his Turtan, to win the Jews by seductive promises, or -to subdue Jerusalem by force. Once more, therefore, the Holy City saw -beneath her often-captured walls the vast beleaguering host, and -"governors and rulers clothed most gorgeously, horsemen riding upon -horses, all of them desirable young men." Isaiah describes to us how the -people crowded to the house-tops, half dead with fear, weeping and -despairing, and crying to the hills to cover them, and bereft of their -rulers, who had been bound by the archers of the enemy in their attempt -to escape. They gazed on the quiver-bearing warriors of Elam in their -chariots, and the serried ranks of the shields of Kir, and the cavalry -round the gates. And he tells us how, as so often occurs at moments of -mad hopelessness, many who ought to have been crying to God in sackcloth -and ashes, gave themselves up, on the contrary, to riot and revelry, -eating flesh, and drinking wine, and saying: "Let us eat and drink; for -to-morrow we die."[565] The king alone had shown patience, calmness, and -active foresight; and he alone, by his energy and faith, had restored -some confidence to the spirits of his fainting people. - -Although the city had been refortified by the king, and supplied with -water, the hearts of the inhabitants must have sunk within them when -they saw the Assyrian army investing the walls, and when the three -commissioners--taking their station "by the conduit of the upper pool -which is in the highway of the fuller's field"--summoned the king to -hear the ultimatum of Sennacherib. - -The king did not in person obey the summons; but he, too, sent out his -three chief officers. They were Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah, who, as -the chamberlain (_al-hab-baîth_), was a great prince (_nagîd_); -Shebna, who had been degraded, perhaps at the instance of Isaiah, from -the higher post, and was now secretary (_sopher_); and Joah, son of -Asaph, the chronicler (_mazkîr_), to whom we probably owe the minute -report of the memorable scene. No doubt they went forth in the pomp of -office--Eliakim with his robe, and girdle, and key.[566] The -Rabshakeh proved himself, indeed, "an affluent orator," and evinced -such familiarity with the religious politics of Judah and Jerusalem, -that this, in conjunction with his perfect mastery of Hebrew, gives -colour to the belief that he was an apostate Jew. He began by -challenging the idle confidence of Hezekiah, and his vain words[567] -that he had counsel and strength for the war. Upon what did he rely? -On the broken and dangerous bulrush of Egypt?[568] It would but pierce -his hand! On Jehovah? But Hezekiah had forfeited his protection by -sweeping away His _bamoth_ and His altars! Why, let Hezekiah make a -wager;[569] and if Sennacherib furnished him with two thousand horses, -he would be unable to find riders for them! How, then, could he drive -back even the lowest of the Assyrian captains? And was not Jehovah on -their side? It was He who had bidden them destroy Jerusalem! - -That last bold assertion, appealing as it did to all that was -erroneous and abject in the minds of the superstitious, and backed, as -it was, by the undeniable force of the envoy's argument, smote so -bitterly on the ear of Hezekiah's courtiers, that they feared it would -render negotiation impossible. They humbly entreated the orator to -speak to "his servants" in the Aramaic language of Assyria, which they -understood,[570] and not in Hebrew, which was the language of all the -Jews who stood in crowds on the walls. Surely this was a diplomatic -embassy to their king, not an incitement to popular sedition? - -The answer of the Rabshakeh was truly Assyrian in its utterly brutal -and ruthless coarseness. Taking up his position directly in front of -the wall,[571] and ostentatiously addressing the multitude, he ignored -the representatives of Hezekiah. Who were they? asked he. His master -had not sent him to speak to them, or to their poor little puppet of a -king, but to the people on the wall, the foul garbage of whose -sufferings of thirst and famine they should share.[572] And to all the -multitude the great king's[573] message was:--Do not be deceived. -Hezekiah cannot save you. Jehovah will not save you. Come to terms -with me, and give me hostages and pledges and a present, and then live -in happy peace and plenty until I come and deport you to a land as -fair and fruitful as this. How should Jehovah deliver them? Had any of -the gods of the nations delivered them out of the hands of the King of -Assyria? "Where are the gods of Hamath, and of Arpad? Where are the -gods of Sepharvaim, Hena, and Ivvah? Have the gods of Samaria -delivered Samaria out of my hand, that Jehovah should deliver -Jerusalem out of my hand?"[574] - -It was a very powerful oration, but the orator must have been a little -disconcerted to find that it was listened to in absolute silence. He -had disgracefully violated the comity of international intercourse by -appealing to subjects against their lawful king; yet from the starving -people there came not a murmur of reply. Faithful to the behest of -their king in the midst of their misery and terror, they answered not -a word. Agamemnon is silent before the coarse jeers of Thersites. "The -sulphurous flash dies in its own smoke, only leaving a hateful stench -behind it!" And in this attitude of the people there was something -very sublime and very instructive. Dumb, stricken, starving, the -wretched Jews did not answer the envoy's taunts or menaces, because -they would not. They were not even in those extremities to be seduced -from their allegiance to the king whom they honoured, though the -speaker had contemptuously ignored his existence. And though the -Rabshakeh had cut them to the heart with his specious appeals and -braggart vaunts, yet "this clever, self-confident, persuasive -personage, with two languages on his tongue, and an army at his back," -could not shake the confidence in God, which, however unreasonable it -might seem, had been elevated into a conviction by their king and -their prophet. The Rabsak had tried to seduce the people into -rebellion, but he had failed.[575] They were ready to die for Hezekiah -with the fidelity of despair. The mirage of sensual comfort in exiled -servitude should not tempt them from the scorched wilderness from -which they could still cry out for the living God. - -Yet the Assyrian's words had struck home into the hearts of his -greatest hearers, and therefore how much more into those of the -ignorant multitudes! Eliakim and Shebna and Joah came to Hezekiah -with their clothes rent, and told him the words of the Rabshakeh. And -when the king heard it, when he found that even his submission had -been utterly in vain, he too rent his clothes, and put on -sackcloth,[576] and went into the only place where he could hope to -find comfort, even into the house of the Lord, which he had cleansed -and restored to beauty, although afterwards he had been driven to -despoil it. Needing an earthly counsellor, he sent Eliakim and Shebna -and the elders of the priests to Isaiah. They were to tell him the -outcome of this day of trouble, rebuke, and contumely; and since the -Rabshakeh had insulted and despised Jehovah, they were to urge the -prophet to make his appeal to Him, and to pray for the remnant which -the Assyrians had left.[577] - -The answer of Isaiah was a dauntless defiance. If others were in -despair, he was not in the least dismayed. "Be not afraid"--such was -his message--"of the mere words with which the boastful boys of the -King of Assyria have blasphemed Me.[578] Behold, I will put a spirit -in him, and he shall hear a rumour,[579] and shall return to his own -land; and I will cause him to fall by the sword in his own land." - -Much crestfallen at the total and unexpected failure of the embassy, and -of his own heart-shaking appeals, the Rabshakeh returned. But meanwhile -Sennacherib had taken Lachish, and marched to Libnah (Tel-es-Safîa), -which he was now besieging.[580] There it was that he heard the "rumour" -of which Isaiah had spoken--the report, namely, that Tirhakah, the third -king of the Ethiopian dynasty of Pharaohs,[581] was advancing in person -to meet him. This was B.C. 701, and it is perhaps only by anticipation -that Tirhakah is called "King" of Ethiopia. He was only the general and -representative of his father Shabatok, if (as some think) he did not -succeed to the throne till 698. - -It was impossible for Sennacherib under these circumstances to return -northwards to Jerusalem, of which the siege would inevitably occupy -some time. But he sent a menacing letter,[582] reminding Hezekiah that -neither king nor god had ever yet saved any city from the hands of the -Assyrian destroyers. Where were the kings, he asked again, of Hamath, -Arpad, Sepharvaim, Hena, Ivvah? What had the gods of Gozan, Haran, -Rezeph, and the children of Eden in Telassar done to save their -countries from Sennacherib's ancestors, when they had laid them under -the ban?[583] - -Again the pious king found comfort in God's Temple. Taking with him the -scornful and blasphemous letter, he spread it out before Jehovah in the -Temple with childlike simplicity, that Jehovah might read its insults -and be moved by this dumb appeal.[584] Then both he and Isaiah cried -mightily to God, "who sitteth above the cherubim," admitting the truth -of what Sennacherib had said, and that the kings of Assyria had -destroyed the nations, and burnt their vain gods in the fire. But of -what significance was that? Those were but gods of wood and stone, the -works of men's hands.[585] But Jehovah was the One, the True, the Living -God. Would He not manifest among the nations His eternal supremacy? - -And as the king prayed the word of Jehovah came to Isaiah, and he sent -to Hezekiah this glorious message about Sennacherib:-- - -"The virgin, the daughter of Zion, hath despised thee, and laughed thee -to scorn. The daughter of Jerusalem hath shaken her head at thee."[586] - -The blasphemies, the vaunts, the menacing self-confidence of -Sennacherib, were his surest condemnation. Did he count God a cypher? -It was to God alone that he owed the fearful power which had made the -nations like grass upon the housetops, like blasted corn, before him. -And because God knew his rage and tumult, God would treat him as -Sargon his father had treated conquered kings:-- - -"I will put My hook in thy nose, and My bridle in thy lips.[587] And I -will turn thee back by the way by which thou camest." He had thought -to conquer Egypt:[588] instead of that he should be driven back in -confusion to Assyria. - -It was but a plainer enunciation of the truths which Isaiah had again -and again intimated in enigma and parable. It was the fearless -security of Judah's lion; the safety of the rock amid the deluge; the -safety of the poor brood under the wings of the Divine protection from -"the great Birds'-nester of the world"; the crashing downfall of the -lopped Lebanonian cedar, while the green shoot and tender branch out -of the withered stump of Jesse should take root downward and bear -fruit upward.[589] - -And the sign was given to Hezekiah that this should be so.[590] This -year there should be no harvest, except such as was spontaneous; for -in the stress of Assyrian invasion sowing and reaping had been -impossible. The next year the harvest should only be from this -accidental produce. But in the third year, secure at last, they should -sow and reap, and plant vineyards and eat the fruit thereof.[591] And -though but a remnant of the people was left out of the recent -captivity, they should grow and flourish, and Jerusalem should see the -besieging host of Assyria no more for ever; for Jehovah would defend -the city for His own sake, and for His servant David's sake. - -Thereafter occurred the great deliverance.[592] In some way--we know -not and never shall know how--by a blast of the simoom, or sudden -outburst of plague, or furious panic, or sudden assault, or by some -other calamity,[593] the host of Assyria was smitten in the camp, and -one hundred and eighty-five thousand, including their chief leaders, -perished. The historian, in a manner habitual to pious Semitic -writers, attributes the devastation to the direct action of the "angel -of the Lord";[594] but as Dr. Johnson said long ago, "We are certainly -not to suppose that the angel went about with a sword in his hand, -striking them one by one, but that some powerful natural agent was -employed."[595] - -The Forty-Sixth Psalm is generally regarded as the _Te Deum_ sung in -the Temple over this deliverance, and its opening words, "God is our -refuge and strength," are inscribed over the cathedral of St. Sophia -at Constantinople. - -It is usually supposed that this overwhelming disaster happened to the -host of Assyria _before Jerusalem_. This, however, is not stated; and -as the capture of Lachish was an urgent necessity, it is probable that -the Turtan led back the forces which had accompanied him, and took -them afterwards to Libnah.[596] Yet, since Libnah was but ten miles -from Jerusalem, the Jews could not feel safe for a day until the -mighty news came that the - - "Angel of God spread his wings on the blast, - And breathed in the face of the foe as he passed, - And the eyes of the sleepers waxed heavy and chill, - And their breasts but once heaved, and for ever grew still." - -When the catastrophe which had happened to the main army and the flight -of Sennacherib became known, the scattered forces would melt away. - -All the Assyrians who escaped were now hurrying back[597] to Nineveh -with their foiled king. Sennacherib seems to have occupied himself in -the north, except so far as he was forced to fight fiercely against -his own rebel subjects. He never recovered this complete humiliation. -He never again came southwards. He survived the catastrophe for -seventeen or twenty years,[598] and fought five or six campaigns; but -at the end of that period, while he was worshipping in the house of -Nisroch or Assarac (Assur), his god,[599] he was murdered by his two -sons Adrammelech (Adar-malik--"Adar is king") and Sharezer -(Nergal-sarussar--"Nergal protect the king"),[600] who envied him his -throne. They escaped into the land of Ararat, but were defeated and -killed by their younger brother Esarhaddon (Assur-âkh-iddin--"Assur -bestowed a 'brother'") at the battle of Hani-Rabbat, on the Upper -Euphrates. He succeeded Sennacherib, and ultimately avenged on Egypt -his father's overwhelming disaster. He is perhaps the "cruel lord" of -Isa. xix. 4, and it is not unnatural that he should have prevailed -against his parricidal brothers, for we are told that in a previous -battle at Melitene he had shown such prowess that the troops then and -there proclaimed him King of Assyria with shouts of "This is our -king."[601] He reigned from B.C. 681-668, and in his reign Assyria -culminated before her last decline.[602] He was the builder of the -temple at Nimrûd, and erected thirty other temples. Babylon and -Nineveh were both his capitals,[603] and he had previously been -viceroy of the former. - -The glorious deliverance in which the faith and courage of the King of -Judah had had their share naturally increased the prosperity and -prestige of Hezekiah, and lifted the authority of Isaiah to an -unprecedented height. Hezekiah probably did not long survive the -uplifting of this dark cloud, but during the remainder of his life "he -was magnified in the sight of all nations."[604] When he died, all -Judah and Jerusalem did him honour, and gave him a splendid burial. -Apparently the old tombs of the kings--the catacomb constructed by -David and Solomon--had in the course of two and a half centuries -become full, so that he had to be buried "in the ascent of the -sepulchres," perhaps some niche higher than the other graves of the -catacomb, which was henceforth disused for the burial of the kings of -Judah. We have had occasion to observe the many particulars in which -his reign was memorable, and to his other services must be added the -literary activity to which we owe the collection and editing, by his -scribes, of the Proverbs of Solomon. His reign had practically -witnessed the institution of the faithful Jewish Church under the -influence of his great prophetic guide.[605] - -The question whether the portent of the destruction of the Assyrian -was identical with that related by Herodotus has never been finally -answered. Herodotus places the scene of the disaster at Pelusium,[606] -and tells this story:--Sennacherib, King of the Arabs and Assyrians, -invaded Egypt. Its king, Sethos, of the Tanite dynasty, in despair -entered the temple of his god Pthah (or Vulcan), and wept.[607] The -god appeared to him with promises of deliverance, and Sethos marched -to meet Sennacherib with an army of poor artisans, since he was a -priest, and the caste of warriors was ill-affected to him. In the -night the god Pthah sent hosts of field-mice, which gnawed the -quivers, bow-strings, and shield-straps of the Assyrians, who -consequently fled, and were massacred. An image of the priest-king -with a mouse in his hand stood in the temple of Pthah, and on its -pedestal the inscription, which might also point the moral of the -Biblical narrative, Ἐς ἐμέ τις ὁρεῶν εὐσεβὴς ἔστω ("Let him who looks -on me be pious"). Josephus seems so far to accept this version that he -refers to Herodotus, and says that Sennacherib's failure was the -result of a frustration in Egypt.[608] The _mouse_ in the hand of the -statue probably originated the details of the legend; but according to -Horapollion it was the hieroglyphic sign of destruction by -plague.[609] Bähr says that it was also the symbol of Mars. Readers of -Homer will remember the title Apollo _Smintheus_ ("the destroyer of -mice"), and the story that mice were worshipped in the Troas because -they gnawed the bow-strings of the enemy. - -But whatever may have been the mode of the retribution, or the scene in -which it took place, it is certainly historical. The outlines of the -narrative in the sacred historian are identical with those in the -Assyrian records. The annals of Sennacherib tell us the four initial -stages of the great campaign in the conquest of Phœnicia, of Askelon, -and of Ekron, the defeat of the Egyptians at Altaqu, and the earlier -hostilities against Hezekiah. The Book of Kings concentrates our -attention on the details of the close of the invasion. On this point, -whether from accident, or because Sennacherib did not choose to register -his own calamity, and the frustration of the gods of whose protection he -boasted, the Assyrian records are silent. Baffled conquerors rarely -dwell on their own disasters. It is not in the despatches of Napoleon -that we shall find the true story of his abandonment of Syria, of the -defeats of his forces in Spain, or of his retreat from Moscow.[610] - -The great lesson of the whole story is the reward and the triumph of -indomitable faith. Faith may still burn with a steady flame when the -difficulties around it seem insuperable, when all refutation of the -attacks of its enemies seems to be impossible, when Hope itself has -sunk into white ashes in which scarcely a gleam of heat remains. -Isaiah had nothing to rely upon; he had no argument wherewith to -furnish Hezekiah beyond the bare and apparently unmeaning promise, -"Jehovah is our Judge; Jehovah is our Lawgiver; Jehovah is our King. -He will save us." It was a magnificent vindication of his inspired -conviction, when all turned out--not indeed in minute details, but in -every essential fact--exactly as he had prophesied from the first. -Even in B.C. 740 he had declared that the sins of Judah deserved and -would receive condign punishment, though a remnant should be -saved.[611] That the retribution would come from some foreign -enemy--Assyria or Egypt, or both--he felt sure. Jehovah would hiss for -the fly in the uttermost canals of Egypt, and for the bee that is in -the land of Assyria, and both should swarm in the crevices of the -rocks, and over the pastures.[612] Later on in 732, in the reign of -Ahaz, he pointed to Assyria,[613] as the destined scourge, and he -realised this still more clearly in 725 and 721, when Shalmaneser and -Sargon were tearing Samaria to pieces.[614] Contrary, indeed, to his -expectation, the Assyrians did not then destroy Jerusalem, or even -formally besiege it. The revolt from Assyria, the reliance on Egypt, -did not for a moment blind his judgment or alter his conviction; and -in 701 it came true when Sennacherib was on the march for -Palestine.[615] Yet he never wavered in the apparently impossible -conclusion, that, in spite of all, in spite even of his own darker -prophecies (xxxii. 14), Jerusalem shall in some Divine manner be -saved.[616] The deliverance would be, as he declared from first to -last, the work of Jehovah, not the work of man,[617] and because of it -Sennacherib would return to his own land and perish there.[618] The -details might be dim and wavering; the result was certain. Isaiah was -no thaumaturge, no peeping wizard, no muttering necromancer, no -monthly prognosticator.[619] He was a prophet--that is, an inspired -moral and spiritual teacher who was able to foresee and to foretell, -not in their details, but in their broad outlines, the events yet -future, because he was enabled to read them by the eye of faith ere -they had yet occurred. His faith convinced him that predictions -founded on eternal principles have all the certainty of a law, and -that God's dealings with men and nations in the future can be seen in -the light of experience derived from the history of the past. Courage, -zeal, unquenchable hope, indomitable resolution, spring from that -perfect confidence in God which is the natural reward of innocence and -faithfulness. Isaiah trusted in God, and he knew that they who put -their trust in Him can never be confounded. - -No event produced a deeper impression on the minds of the Jews, though -that impression was soon afterwards, for a time, obliterated. -Naturally, it elevated the authority of Isaiah into unquestioned -pre-eminence during the reign of Hezekiah. It has left its echo, not -only in his own triumphant pæans, but also in the Forty-Sixth Psalm, -which the Septuagint calls "An ode to the Assyrian," and perhaps also -in the Seventy-Fifth and Seventy-Sixth Psalms. In the minds of all -faithful Israelites it established for ever the conviction that God -had chosen Judah for Himself, and Israel for His own possession; that -God was in the midst of Zion, and she should not be confounded: "God -shall help her, and that right early." And it contains a noble and -inspiring lesson for all time. "It is not without reason," says Dean -Stanley, "that in the Churches of Moscow the exultation over the fall -of Sennacherib is still read on the anniversary of the retreat of the -French from Russia, or that Arnold, in his lectures on Modern History, -in the impressive passage in which he dwells on that great -catastrophe, declared that for the memorable night of the frost in -which twenty thousand horses perished, and the strength of the French -army was utterly broken, he knew of no language so well fitted to -describe it as the words in which Isaiah described the advance and -destruction of the hosts of Sennacherib."[620] - -They had been brought face to face, the two kings--Sennacherib and -Hezekiah. One was the impious boaster who relied on his own strength, -and on the mighty host which dried up rivers with their trampling -march--the worldling who thought to lord it over the affrighted globe; -the other was the poor kinglet of the Chosen People, with his one city -and his enfeebled people, and his dominion not so large as one of the -smallest English counties. But "one with God is irresistible," "one -with God is always in a majority." The poor, weak prince triumphs over -the terrific conqueror, because he trusts in Him to whom -world-desolating tyrants are but as the small dust of the balance, -and who "taketh up the isles as a very little thing."[621] - -As Assyria now vanishes almost entirely from the history of the Chosen -People, we may here recall with delight one large and loving prophecy, -to show that the Hebrews were sometimes uplifted by the power of -inspiration above the narrowness of a bigoted and exclusive spirit. -Desperately as Israel had suffered, both from Egypt and Assyria, Isaiah -could still utter the glowing Messianic Prophecy which included the -Gentiles in the privileges of the Golden Age to come. He foretold that-- - -"In that day shall Israel be the third with Egypt and Assyria, as a -blessing in the midst of the land: whom the Lord of hosts shall bless, -saying, Blessed be Egypt My people, and Assyria the work of My hands, -and Israel Mine inheritance."[622] - - "That strain I heard was of a higher mood!" - - * * * * * - -King Hezekiah can have no finer panegyric than that of the son of -Sirach: "Even the kings of Judah failed, for they forsook the law of -the Most High: all except David, and Ezekias, and Josias failed."[623] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[560] Isa. xxxiii. 8. - -[561] Isa. xx. 1. - -[562] Jer. xxxix. 3. The meaning of the name is not certain. _Sarîs_, -in Hebrew, is "eunuch"; but the word is not known in Assyrian records, -and we should expect _Rabsarîsîm_, as in Dan. i. 3. - -[563] Rabsak perhaps means _chief officer_ or vizier, and is Hebraised -into Rabshakeh. Prof. G. A. Smith (_Isaiah_, p. 345) calls him -"Sennacherib's Bismarck." Rabshakeh, usually rendered "chief cupbearer," -is an Aramaised form of Rabsak (great chief); but we know of no chief -cupbearer at the Assyrian court (Schrader, _K. A. T._, 199 f.). - -[564] From an Apis-stêlê he seems to have reigned twenty-six years -(B.C. 694-668?). - -[565] Isa. xxii. 1-13. - -[566] Eliakim. See Isa. xxii. 21, 22. - -[567] "Vain words"; lit., "a word of the lips." LXX., λόγοι χειλέων. - -[568] Comp. Isa. xxx. 1-7; Ezek. xxix. 6. It seems to be an -over-refinement to suppose that Sennacherib refers to the divisions -between Egypt and Ethiopia. - -[569] 2 Kings xviii. 23, A.V.: "Let Hezekiah give pledges." - -[570] Heb., _Arâmîth_. - -[571] 2 Kings xviii. 28, where _stood_ should be rendered _came -forward_. - -[572] The coarse expression is softened down by the Chronicler (2 -Chron. xxxii. 18). - -[573] The kings of Assyria usually called themselves "great king, -mighty king, king of the multitude, king of the land Assur." - -[574] Every one must notice the glaring inconsistency between this -_defiance_ of Jehovah and the previous claim to the possession of His -sanction. On Hamath, Arpad, etc., see Schrader, ii. 7-10. - -[575] Isa. xxxiii. 8: "He hath broken the covenant, he hath despised -the cities, he regardeth no man." - -[576] 1 Kings xx. 32; 2 Kings vi. 30. - -[577] Sennacherib had already carried off vast numbers. See Isa. xxiv. -1-12; Demetrius _ap._ Clem. Alex., _Strom._, i. 403. - -[578] Isaiah's phrase, _na'arî melek_, "lads of the king," is -contemptuous. LXX., παιδάρια. - -[579] Heb., _ruach_; LXX., δίδωμι ἐν αὐτῷ πνεῦμα. Theodoret calls this -"spirit" _cowardice_ (τὴν δειλίαν οἶμαι δηλοῦν). - -[580] Libnah means "whiteness." Dean Stanley (_S. and P._, 207, 258) -identifies it with a white-faced hill, the Blanchegarde of the -Crusaders. - -[581] The dates usually given are Sabaco, B.C. 725-712; Shabatok, -712-698; Tirhakah, 698-672. Manetho, Τάραχος; Strabo, Τεράκων, ὁ -Αἰθιώψ. He was third king of the twenty-fifth dynasty, and the -greatest of the Egyptian sovereigns who came from Ethiopia. He reigned -gloriously for many years. We see his figure at Medinet Abou, smiting -ten captive princes with an iron mace; but he was finally defeated by -Esarhaddon, and in 668 by Assurbanipal at Karbanit (Canopus). He is -called by his conqueror "Tar-ku-u, King of Egypt and Cush" (Schrader, -_K. A. T._, 336 ff.). - -[582] Heb., _Sepharîm_; Vulg., _litteræ_; 2 Chron. xxxii. 17. The more -ordinary term for a letter is _iggereth_. - -[583] 2 Kings xix. 12 (Heb.); Ezek. xxvii. 23. On these places see -Schrader, ii. 11, 12. It had been indeed Sennacherib's work "to reduce -fenced cities to ruinous heaps." He boasts on the Bellino Cylinder, -"Their smaller towns without number I overthrew, and reduced them to -heaps of rubbish" (_Records of the Past_, i. 27). - -[584] "It is a prayer without words, a prayer in action, which then -passes into a spoken prayer" (Delitzsch). - -[585] The Assyrians are sometimes represented in their monuments as -hewing idols to pieces in honour of their god Assur (Botta, _Monum._, -pl. 140). - -[586] LXX., κινεῖν τὴν κεφαλήν, "a gesture of scorn" (Psalm xxii. 7, -cix. 25; Lam. ii. 15). With the vaunts of Sennacherib compare -Claudian, _De bell. Geth._, 526-532. - - "Cum cesserit omnis - Obsequiis natura meis? Subsidere nostris - Sub pedibus montes, _arescere vidimus amnes_ ... - Fregi Alpes, _galeis Padum victricibus hausi_." - KEIL, _ad loc._ - - -[587] Comp. 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11 (Heb.); Psalm xxxix. 1; Isa. xxx. 28; -Ezek. xxxviii. 4, xxix. 4. The Assyrians drove a ring through the -lower lip, the Babylonians through the nose. See Rawlinson, _Ancient -Monarchies_, ii. 314, iii. 436. - -[588] 2 Kings xix. 33. "The river of Egypt" (_Nachal-ha-Mizraim_) is -the Wady-el-Arish. - -[589] Isa. x. 33, 34, xi. 1, xiv. 8; Stanley, _Lectures_, ii. 410. - -[590] אוֹת. A sign "is a thing, an event, or an action intended as a -pledge of the Divine certainty of another. Sometimes it is a miracle -(Gen. iv. 15, Heb.), or a permanent symbol (Isa. viii. 18, xx. 3, -xxxvii. 30; Jer. xliv. 29)" (Delitzsch). - -[591] The first year they should eat _saphîach_ (LXX., αὐτόματα; -Vulg., _quæ repereris_); the second year, _sachîsh_ (LXX., τὰ -ἀνατέλλοντα; Vulg., _quæ sponte nascuntur_). - -[592] 2 Kings xix. 35: "It came to pass that night." Isaiah only has -"then"; Josephus, κατὰ τὴν πρώτην τῆς πολιορκίας νύκτα. Menochius -understands it "_in celebri illa nocte_." The LXX. omits "that," and -simply says "in the night" (νυκτός). Comp. Psalm xlvi. 5 (Heb.); Isa. -xvii. 14. - -[593] Josephus, followed by many moderns, and even by Keil, suggests a -plague. The malaria of the Pelusiotic marshes easily breeds pestilence. -The "_maleak Jehovah_" is "the destroyer" (_mashchith_) (Exod. xii. 23; -2 Sam. xxiv. 16.) Comp. Justin., xix. 11; Diod. Sic., xix. 434. - -[594] Comp. 2 Sam. xxiv. 15, 16. - -[595] The Babyl. Talmud and some Targums, followed by Vitringa, etc., -attribute to it storms of lightning; Prideaux, Heine, and Faber, to -the simoom; R. José, Ussher, etc., to a nocturnal attack of Tirhakah. - -[596] It is, however, perfectly possible that a contingent was left on -guard. "Where is the [past] terror? Where is he that rated the -tribute? Where is he that received it?" (Isa. xxxiii. 18). "At the -noise of the tumult the people flee" (Isa. xxxiii. 3); "At Thy rebuke, -O God of Jacob, both chariot and horse are cast into a dead sleep" -(Psalm lxxvi. 6). Comp. Psalm xlviii. 4-6. - -[597] This is the meaning of "he departed, and went, and returned." - -[598] Not, only fifty-five days, as we read in Tobit i. 21. - -[599] Jos., _Antt._, X. i. 5: "In his own temple to Araskê"; LXX., -Ἀσαράχ; Isa. xxxvii. 38. One guess connects the word with Nesher, "the -eagle-god," often seen on the Assyrian bas-reliefs. Lenormant calls -him "the god of human destiny." - -[600] Alex. Polyhistor _ap._ Euseb., i. 27; Kimchi _ad_ 2 Kings xix. -37. Buxtorf (_Bibl. Rabbinic._) says that Sennacherib entered the -temple to ask his counsellors why Jehovah favoured Israel. Being told -that it was because of Abraham's willingness to offer Isaac, he said, -"Then I will offer my two sons." Rashi adds that they slew him to save -their own lives. (See Schenkel and Riehm, _s.v._ "Sanherib"--both -articles by Schrader). - -[601] See Schrader in Riehm's _Handwörterbuch_, _s.vv._ "Sanherib," -"Asarhaddon." Esarhaddon, judging from what is called "Sennacherib's -will," in which the king leaves him splendid presents, seems to have -been a favourite of his father (_Records of the Past_, i. 136). He -says that on hearing of his father's murder, "I was wrathful as a -lion, and my soul raged within me, and I lifted my hands to the great -gods to assume the sovereignty of my father's house." See Appendix I. - -[602] The Book of Tobit (i. 21) calls him Sarchedonas. - -[603] 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11. - -[604] 2 Chron. xxxii. 23. - -[605] Wellhausen, p. 116. - -[606] Herod., ii. 14. "Sin" (Tanis?), Ezek. xxx. 15. It lay in the -midst of morasses, and some attribute the catastrophe to the malaria. - -[607] The deliverance is really connected with Tirhakah, whose deeds -are recorded in a temple at Medinet Habou, but the jealousy of the -Memphites attributed it to the piety of Sethos. See G. W. Wilkinson, -_Ancient Egyptians_, i. 141; Rawlinson, _Herodotus_, i. 394. - -[608] _Antt._, X. i. 1-5. - -[609] Comp. 1 Sam. v., vi., where, after a plague, the Philistines -sent an expiation of five golden mice. - -[610] We may add that even the Chronicler drops a veil over -Sennacherib's actual capture of fortresses in Judah ("he _thought_ to -win them for himself," 2 Chron. xxxii. 1: comp. 2 Kings xviii. 13; -Isa. xxxvi. 1). - -[611] Isa. vi. 11-13. - -[612] Isa. v. 26-30. - -[613] Isa. vii. 18. - -[614] Isa. viii., xxviii. 1-15, x. 28-34. - -[615] Isa. xiv. 29-32, xxix., xxx. - -[616] Isa. i. 19, 20. - -[617] Isa. x. 33, xxix. 5-8, xxx. 20-26, 30-33. - -[618] Isa. xxxviii. 6. See for this paragraph an admirable chapter in -Prof. Smith's _Isaiah_, pp. 368-374. - -[619] Isa. xlvii. 13. - -[620] Stanley, _Lectures_, ii. 531. - -[621] Isa. xl. 15. - -[622] Isa. xix. 24, 25. - -[623] Ecclus. xlix. 4. - - - - - CHAPTER XXIX - - _MANASSEH_ - - B.C. 686-641 - - 2 KINGS xxi. 1-16 - - "Shall the throne of wickedness have fellowship with Thee, - That frameth mischief by statute? - They gather themselves in troops against the soul of the righteous, - And condemn the innocent blood."--PSALM xciv. 20, 21. - - "Though the mills of God grind slowly, yet they grind - exceeding small; - Though with patience long He waiteth, with exactness grinds - He all." - - -Manasseh was born after Hezekiah's recovery from his terrible illness. -He was but twelve years old when he began to reign. Of his mother -Hephzibah we know nothing, nor of the Zechariah who was her father; -but perhaps Isaiah in one passage (lxii. 4) may refer to her name, "My -delight is in her."[624] The son of Hezekiah and Hephzibah was the -worst of all the kings of Judah, and had the longest reign. - -The tender age of Manasseh when he came to the throne may perhaps -account for the fact that the "forgetfulness" which his name -implied[625] was not a forgetting of other sorrows, but of all that -was noble and righteous in the attempted reformation which had been -the main religious work of his father's life. In Judah, as in England, -a king was not supposed to be of age until he was eighteen.[626] For -six years Manasseh must have been to a great extent under the -influence of his regents and counsellors. - -There always existed in Jerusalem, even in the best times, a -heathenising party, and it was, unfortunately, composed of princes and -aristocrats who could bring strong influence to bear upon the -king.[627] They did not deny Jehovah, but they did not recognise Him -as the sole or the supreme God of heaven and earth. To them He was the -local deity of Israel and Judah. But there were other gods, the gods -of the nations, and their aim always was to recognise the existence of -these deities and to pay homage to their power. If their favour could -not be purchased except by their immediate votaries, at least their -anger might be averted. These politicians advocated a fatal and -incongruous syncretism, or at least an unlimited tolerance for heathen -idols, for which they could, unhappily, quote the precepts and example -of the Wise King, Solomon. If any one questioned their views as a -dangerous idolatry, and an insult to - - "Jehovah thundering out of Zion, throned - Between the cherubim," - -they had but to point from the walls of Jerusalem to the confronting -summit of Olivet, where still remained the shrines which the son of -David had erected three centuries earlier to Chemosh, and Milcom, and -Ashtoreth, who, since his day, had always found, even in Jerusalem, -some worshippers, open or secret, to acknowledge their divinity. - -And these worldlings, in their tolerance for the intolerable, could -always appeal to two powerful instincts of man's fallen -nature--sensuality and fear--"lust hard by hate." There was something -in the worship of Baal-Peor and of Moloch which appealed to the -undying ape and tiger in the unregenerate human heart. - -The true worship of Jehovah is exactly that form of religion which man -finds it least easy to render to Him--the religion of pure morality. -Services, rites, functions, look like religious diligence, and readily -secure a reverent outward devotion. Even self-maceration, fasts, and -flagellation are a cheap way of escaping the "endless torments" which -always loom so hugely in terrifying superstition. - -Such superstitions are children of the fear and faithlessness which hath -torment. They are the corruptions with which every form of false -religion, and with which also a corrupt and perverted Christianity, are -always tainted. And they demand the easy expiation of physical ritual. -But all the best and most spiritual teachers of Scripture--alike the -Hebrew Prophets and the Christian Apostles--are at one with the Lord -Christ in perpetual insistence on the truth that "mercy is better than -sacrifice," and that true religion consists in that good mind and good -life which are the sole proof of genuine sincerity. - -If Jehovah would but be contented with gifts, men would gladly offer -Him thousands of rams and tens of thousands of rivers of oil. But the -prophets taught that He was above all mean bribes, and that such -offerings never could be anything to One whose were all the beasts of -the forests and the cattle upon a thousand hills. It was not easy, -then, to bribe such a God, or to make Him a respecter of persons. - -How easy, again, would it be, if He would even accept human -sacrifices! A child was but a child. How easy to kill a child, and -place it in the brazen arms which sloped over the fiery cistern! -Moloch and Chemosh were supremely to be won by such holocausts; and -surely Moloch and Chemosh must be lords of power! But here again the -prophets of Jehovah stepped in, and said that it was of no avail with -the High, the Holy, the Merciful, to give even our firstborn for our -transgressions, or the fruit of the body for the sin of the soul. - -Asceticism, then--occasional fasting, severe self-deprivations--surely -the gods would accept these? And they were as nothing compared to the -burden of sin and the agony of conscience! Baal and Asherah could -command agonised devotees, and could approve of them. By Jehovah and -His prophets such bodily service is discouraged and forbidden. - -Pleasure, then?--the consecration of the natural impulses, the -devotion in religious cultus of the passions and appetites of the -flesh--why should that be so abhorrent to Jehovah? Other deities -exulted in licentiousness. Was not the temple of Astarte full of her -women-worshippers and of her eunuchs? Was there no fascination in the -voluptuous allurements, the orgiastic dances, the stolen waters, the -bread eaten in secret, when not only was the conscience lulled by the -removal therefrom of all sense of guilt and degradation, but such -orgies were even crowned with merit, as part of an acceptable worship? -After all, there was "a fascination of corruption" in these idols of -gold and jewels, of lust and blood! - -How stern, how cold, how bare, by comparison, was the moral law which -only said, "Thou shalt not," and emphasised its prohibition with the -unalterable sanctions, "This do, and thou shalt live"; "Do it not, and -thou shalt die"! What could they make of a religion which was so -eloquently silent as to the meritoriousness of ritual? - -And how chill and simple and dreary was that which--according to -Micah--Jehovah had shown to be good, and which He required of every -man,--which was nothing more than to do justly, and to love mercy, and -to walk humbly with God! - -And what right had the prophets--so asked these apostates--to lord it -over God's heritage in this way? Solomon was the greatest king of -Israel and Judah; and Solomon had never been so exclusive in his -religionism, though he had built the Temple of the Lord; nor Rehoboam; -nor the great Phœnician Queen Athaliah; nor the cultivated and -æsthetic Ahaz; nor, in the kingdom of Israel, the lordly warrior Ahab; -nor the splendid and long-lived victor Jeroboam II. Had not Manasseh -plenty of examples of religious syncretism, to which he might appeal -in the joy of his youthful age? - -Not impossibly there lay in the background another reason why the -young king might be inclined to listen to these evil counsellors. -Micah may still have been living; but of Isaiah we hear no more. -Probably he was dead. It is not recorded that he delivered any -prophecy during the reign of Manasseh, nor is it certain that he -outlived the former king. Tradition, indeed, in later days, asserted -that he had confronted Manasseh, and been doomed to death; that he had -taken refuge in a cedar tree, and in that cedar had been sawn asunder; -but the tradition is wholly without a vestige of authority. One of -Micah's sternest oracles was perhaps uttered in the days of -Manasseh.[628] But Micah was only a provincial prophet of -Moresheth-Gath. He never moved in the midst of princes as Isaiah had -done, or possessed a tithe of the authority which had rested for so -many years on the shoulders of his mighty contemporary. - -Moreover--so the heathen party might suggest--had not Isaiah's -prophecies been falsified by the result? Had he not distinctly -promised and pledged his credit to two things? and had not both turned -out to be unworthy of reliance? - -i. Surely he had prophesied the utter downfall of the Assyrians. And it -was true that after his disaster on the confines of Egypt, Sennacherib -had fled in haste to Nineveh, and his occupations with rebels on his own -frontiers had left Judah unmolested, and he had been murdered by his -sons. But, on the other hand, in no sense of the word had Assyria -fallen. On the contrary, she had never been more powerful. Not one of -his predecessors had seemed more irresistible than Esarhaddon. He was -undisputed king of Babylon and of Nineveh. There would be no more -embassies from Merodach-Baladan, or any revolted viceroy! And rumour -would early begin to narrate that Esarhaddon had not forgotten the -catastrophe at Pelusium, but intended to avenge it, and to teach Egypt -the forgotten lessons of Raphia (B.C. 720) and Altaqu (B.C. 701). - -ii. And as for Judah, where was the golden Messianic age which Isaiah -had promised? Where did they see the Divine Prince whom he had -foretold, or the lion lying down with the lamb, and the child laying -his hand on the cockatrice's den? - -All this, they would argue, had greatly shaken Isaiah's prophetic -authority. Judah was a mere vassal--safe only in so far as she -remained a vassal, and did not join Tyre or any other rebellious -power, but abode safe under the shadow of Assyria's mighty wings. - -Was it not, then, as well to look facts in the face? to accept things -as they were? And--so they would argue, with false plausibility--since -the triumph, after all, had remained with the gods of the nations, -might it not be as well to dethrone Jehovah from His exclusive -dominion, and at least to propitiate the potent and less-exacting -deities, the charming _Dî faciles_ who smiled at lewd aberrations, and -even flung over them the glamour of devotion? - -With these bolder renegades would be the whole body of the priests of -the _bamoth_. Those old sanctuaries had been repressed by Hezekiah -without any compensation; for in those days life-interests were -little, or not at all, regarded. Multitudes of priests and Levites -must have been flung out of employment and reduced to poverty by the -recent religious revolution. It is not likely that they bore without a -murmur the obliteration of forms of worship sanctioned by immemorial -custom, or that they made no efforts to procure the re-establishment -of what the people loved. - -Thus a vast weight of evil influence was brought to bear upon the -boy-king; and it was also the more powerful because repeated -indications exist that, while the king was nominally a despot, and was -surrounded with external observance, the real control of affairs was, -to a large extent, in the hands of an aristocracy of priests and -princes, except when the king was a man of great personal force. - -Manasseh went over to these retrogressionists heart and soul, and he -contentedly remained a tributary of Assyria. Even when Esarhaddon's -forces marched to the chastisement of Egypt, he felt secure in his -allegiance to the dominant tyrant of Babylon and Nineveh, whose -interest it would be not to disturb a faithful subject. - -There followed a reaction, an absolute rebound from the old -monotheistic strictness and righteousness. The nation emancipated -itself from the moral law as with a shout of relief, and plunged into -superstition and licentiousness. The reign of Manasseh resembled at -once the recrudescence of Popery in the reign of Mary Tudor, with its -rekindling of the fires of Smithfield, and the foul orgies of -debauchery at the Restoration of 1660, when human nature, loving -degraded licence better than strenuous liberty, flung away the noble -freedom of Puritanism for the loathly mysteries of Cotytto. The age of -Manasseh resembled that of Charles II., in the famous description of -Lord Macaulay. "Then came days never to be recalled without a blush, -the days of servitude without loyalty, and sensuality without love, of -dwarfish talents and gigantic vices, the paradise of cold hearts and -narrow minds, the golden age of the coward, the bigot, and the slave. -In every high place worship was paid to Belial and Moloch, and England -propitiated these obscene and cruel idols with the blood of her best -and bravest children." Sensuous intoxication is in all cases closely -connected with fiendish cruelty, and the introducer of voluptuous -idolatries naturally became the first persecutor of the true religion. - -1. The first step of the king, and probably the one which the people -welcomed most, was the restoration of the chapelries under the trees -and on the hills, which, more strenuously than any of his -predecessors, Hezekiah had at least attempted to put down. For this -step Manasseh might have pleaded the sanction of ages to which the -Book of Deuteronomy had either been wholly unknown, or during which -its laws had become as utterly forgotten as though they had never -existed. To many worshippers these old shrines had become extremely -precious. They felt it to be either an actual impossibility, or at the -best intolerably burdensome, to make their way by long, dreary, and -difficult journeys to Jerusalem, when they desired to pay the most -ordinary rites of worship. They knew no reason, and had never known of -any reason, why Jehovah should be worshipped in one Temple only. All -their religious instincts led them the other way. They could point to -the example of all the highly honoured saints who had worshipped God -at Gilgal, Shechem, Bethel, Hebron, Beersheba, Kedesh, Gibeah, and -many another shrine; and of all the saintly kings who had not dreamt -of interfering with such free worship. Why should Jerusalem monopolise -all sanctity? It might be a politic view for kings to maintain, and -highly profitable for priests to establish; but none of their great -prophets, not even the princely Isaiah, had said one syllable against -the innocent high places of Jehovah. In those days there were no -synagogues. The extinction of the high places doubtless seemed to many -of the people an extinction of religion in daily life, and they were -more than half disposed to agree with the Rabshakeh that Jehovah was -offended by what they regarded as a burdensome, unwise, and sweeping -innovation.--If it be necessary to answer arguments which might have -seemed natural, against a custom which might have seemed innocent, it -must suffice to say that it was the chief mission of Israel to keep -alive among the nations of the world the knowledge of the One True -God, and that, amid the constant temptations to accept the gods of the -heathen as they were adored in groves and on high places, the faith of -Israel could no longer be kept pure except by the Deuteronomic -institution of one central and exclusive shrine. - -2. But Manasseh did far worse than rehabilitate the worship at the high -places which his father had discouraged. "He reared up altars for -Baal,[629] and made an Asherah, as did Ahab, King of Israel." This was -the first bad element of the new cosmopolitan eclecticism. It involved -the acceptance of the Phœnician nature-worship with its manifold -abominations. The people had grown familiar with it under Athaliah (2 -Kings xi. 18), and under Ahaz (2 Chron. xxviii. 2); but Manasseh, as we -infer from the account given of Josiah's reformation, had gone further -than either. He had actually ventured to introduce the image of Baal -into the Temple, and to set up the Asherah-pillar in front of it (2 -Kings xxiii. 4). Worse even than this, he had erected in the very -Temple (_id._ 7) houses devoted to the execrable _Qedeshim_ (Vulg., -_effeminati_), in which also the women wove broidered hangings to adorn -the shrines of the idol image, as in the worship of the Assyrian -Mylitta.[630] He, at the same time, displaced the altar and removed the -Ark. To the latter circumstances is perhaps due the Rabbinic legend that -Hezekiah hid the Ark till the coming of the Messiah. - -3. To this Phœnician worship he added Sabaism, the worship of the -stars, "all the host of heaven, whom he served." This was an entirely -new phase of idolatry, unknown to the Hebrews till they came in -contact with Assyria.[631] It came rapidly into vogue, and exercised -over their imaginations the spell of a seductive novelty, as we see -from the strong testimony of the prophet Jeremiah.[632] This is why it -is so emphatically forbidden in the Book of Deuteronomy.[633] The king -built altars to the stars of the Zodiac (_Mazzaroth_), both in the -outer court of the Temple, and in the court of the priests, and on -these altars incense or victims were continually burned. He also -introduced or encouraged the introduction into the Temple precincts of -the horses and chariots dedicated to the sun.[634] - -When we read of the actual invasion of the Temple-precincts in this as -in preceding and subsequent reigns, we cannot but ask, Were these -atrocities committed with the sanction or with the connivance of the -priests? We are not told. Yet how can it have been otherwise? If the -high priest Azariah could muster eighty priests to oppose King Uzziah, -when he merely wished to burn incense in the Temple, as Solomon had -done before him, and as Ahaz did after him--if Jehoiada could, -according to the Chronicler, muster a perfect army of priests and -Levites to dethrone Athaliah, and could so stir up the people that -they rose _en masse_ to tear down the temple of Baal, and slay Mattan, -his high priest,--how was it possible for Manasseh to perpetrate these -flagrant acts of idolatrous apostasy, if the priests were all ranged -in opposition to his power? Was their authority suddenly paralysed? -Did their influence with the people shrivel into nothing when Hezekiah -had been carried to his tomb? Or did these priests follow the easy and -profitable course which they seem to have followed throughout the -whole history of the kings without an exception?--did they simply -answer the kings according to their idols? - -4. Another, and the most hideous, element of the new mixture of cults -was the reintroduction of the ancient Canaanite worship of Moloch with -its human sacrifices. Manasseh, like Ahaz, made his son or, according -to the Chronicler and the Septuagint, "his sons"--pass through the -fire to this grim Ammonite idol in Tophet of the Valley of Hinnom, so -as to leave no chance untried. And herein he was far more inexcusable -than his grandfather; for Ahaz had at least been driven by desperate -extremity to this last expedient, but Manasseh was living, if not in -prosperity, at least in unbroken peace. Moreover, he not only did this -himself, but did his utmost to make a popular institution of -children-sacrifice, so that many practised it in the dreadful valley -and amid the rocks outside Jerusalem.[635] - -5. Even this did not suffice him. To these Assyrian, Phœnician, and -Canaanite elements of idolatry he added Babylonian novelties. He -practised augury, and used enchantments, and he dealt with familiar -spirits and wizards, as though without Egyptian necromancy and -Mesopotamian shamanism his eclectic worship would be incomplete.[636] - -6. Thus "he wrought much wickedness in the sight of the Lord to -provoke Him to anger." He placed a graven image of his Asherah inside -the Temple, and utterly profaned the sacred house, and seduced his -people "to do more evil than did the nations whom the Lord destroyed -before the children of Israel." - -Whatever was the conduct of the priests, the prophets were not silent. -They denounced Manasseh for having done worse than even the ancient -Amorites, and declared that, in consequence of his crimes, God would -bring upon Jerusalem such evil as would cause both the ears of him -that heard it to tingle;[637] that he would stretch over Jerusalem for -ruin the line and the level of Ahab;[638] that He would cast off even -the remnant, and deliver them to their enemies; that He would wipe out -Jerusalem "as a man wipeth a dish, wiping and turning it upside -down."[639] - -The finest oracles of Micah (vi. 1-vii. 7) were probably uttered in the -reign of Manasseh, and give the simplest and purest expression to the -supremacy of morality as the one true end and test of religion. Micah is -as indifferent as the Decalogue to all claims of rites, ceremonies, and -outward worship. "Jehovah demands nothing for Himself; all that He asks -is for man: this is the fundamental law of the theocracy." - -The apostasies of the king and the denunciation of the prophets thus -came into fierce collision, and led naturally to persecution and -bloodshed. Perhaps in Mic. vii. 1-7 we catch the echoes of the Reign -of Terror. The king resorted to violence, using, no doubt, the -tyrant's devilish plea of necessity. He made blood run like water in -the streets of Jerusalem from end to end,[640] and in the exaggerated -phrase of Josephus, was _daily_ slaying the prophets.[641] It was -during this persecution, according to Rabbinic tradition, that Isaiah -received the martyr's crown.[642] - -And no miracles were wrought to save the martyrs. Elijah and Elisha -had been surrounded with a blaze of miracles, but in Judah no prophet -arose who could so wield the power of Heaven. - -At this point the narrative of the historian about Manasseh ends. If -he shared the current opinion of his day, which connected individual -and national prosperity with well-doing, and regarded length of days -as a sign of the favour of Heaven, while, on the other hand, -misfortune and misery invariably resulted from the wrath of Jehovah, -he could not have been otherwise than surprised, and perhaps even -pained, to have to relate that Manasseh reigned fifty-five years. Not -only was his reign longer than that of any other king of Israel or -Judah; not only did he attain a greater age than any of them; but, -further, no calamity seems to have marked his rule. A contented and -protected vassal of Esarhaddon, secure from his attacks, and also -unmolested by the weakened and subjugated nations around him, he would -seem, in the story of the Kings, to have enjoyed an enviable external -lot, and to have presided over a people who were happy, in that, -during his rule, they had no history. But whatever the writer may have -felt, he tells us no more, and lets us see Manasseh sink peacefully -into his grave "in the garden of his own house, in the garden of -Uzza," and leave to his son Amon a peaceful realm and an undisputed -crown. Such a career would undoubtedly perplex and confound all the -preconceived opinions of Jewish orthodoxy. The prosperity of Manasseh -would have presented as great a problem to them as the miseries of -Job. They looked to temporal prosperity as the reward of -righteousness, and to acute misery as the retribution of apostasy and -sin. They had little or no conception of a future which should redress -the balance of apparent earthly inequalities. Alike the sight of -Manasseh's long reign and Josiah's undeserved death in battle would -give a powerful shock to their fixed convictions. - -Far different is the end of the story in the Book of Chronicles. The -records of Esarhaddon tell us that in 680 he made an expedition into -Palestine to restore the shaken influence of his father,[643] and -about 647 he mentions among his submissive tributaries the kings of -Tyre, Edom, Moab, Gaza, Ekron, Askelon, Gebal, Ammon, Ashdod, and -Manasseh, King of Judah ("Minasi-sar-Yahudi"), as well as ten princes -of Cyprus. Whether the King of Judah rebelled later on, and intrigued -with Tirhakah, we do not know; but in 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11 we read that -Esarhaddon sent his generals to Jerusalem, took Manasseh by stratagem, -drove rings through his lips, bound him in chains, and brought him to -Babylon, where Esarhaddon was holding his court.[644] We find from the -_Eponym Canon_ that Tyre revolted from Assyria in the tenth year of -Esarhaddon, and Manasseh may have been drawn away to join in the -revolt; or he may have joined Shamash-shum-ukîn, the Viceroy of -Babylon, in his revolt against his brother Assurbanipal. As a rule, -the lot of a conquered vassal at the Assyrian Court was horrible, and -in his utter misery Manasseh repented, humbled himself, and -prayed.[645] His prayer was heard. The despots of Nineveh were -capricious alike in their insults and in their favours, and -Esarhaddon not only pardoned Manasseh, but sent him back to -Jerusalem,[646] thinking that he would be more useful to him there -than in a Babylonian dungeon. After this reprieve he lived like a -penitent and a patriot. Esarhaddon was preparing for his expedition -against Tirhakah, and would not attack a king who was now bound to him -by gratitude as well as fear. But the times were very troublous. -Manasseh prepared for eventualities by building an outer wall on the -west of the city of David, unto Gihon in the Valley, by surrounding -Ophel with a high wall, and by garrisoning the fenced cities.[647] All -this was necessary and patriotic work, considering that Judah might be -attacked by other enemies as well as the Assyrians. She was like a -grain of corn amid the grinding mills of the nations. Media and Lydia -were rising into strong kingdoms. Babylon was becoming daily more -formidable. Dim rumours reached the East of movements among vast hosts -of Cimmerian and Scythian barbarians. Jerusalem had no human strength -for war. She could only rely upon her battlements, on the natural -strength of her position, and on the protection of her God. Almost in -the last year of Manasseh, the powerful Psammetichus I., king of a now -united Egypt, made an assault on Ashdod; but he did not venture on the -difficult task of besieging Jerusalem. - -The religious reformation of Manasseh attested the sincerity of his -amendment. He flung out the Asherah from the Temple, put away the -strange gods, destroyed the altars, burnt sacrifices to God, and used -all his power to restore the worship of Jehovah. He did not, however, -destroy the high places. For this story the Chronicler refers to "the -words of Chozai,"[648] according to the present text, which some -suppose to have meant "the story of the Seers." He also refers to a -prayer of Manasseh, which cannot of course be the Greek forgery of the -second or third century which goes by that name in the Apocrypha.[649] -His repentance doubtless secured his own salvation. "Whoso saith -'Manasseh hath no part in the world to come,'" said Rabbi Johanan, -"discourageth the penitent";--but the partial reformation was too late -to save his land. - -Is this a literal history, or an edifying Haggadah? The non-historical -character of the story is maintained by De Wette, Graf, Nöldeke, and -many others. Both views have been taken. This we can, at any rate, -assert--that there seems to be nothing in the story which is -inconsistent with probability. The Chronicler may have derived it from -genuine documents or traditions, though it is difficult to account for -the silence of the elder and more trustworthy historian. Nor is it -only his silence for which we have to account; it is the continuance -of his positive statements. It would be, in any case, a strange -conception of history which, after narrating a man's crimes, omitted -alike the retribution which befell him on account of them, the -heartfelt penitence for the sake of which they were forgiven, and the -seriously earnest endeavour to undo at least something of the evil -which he had done. Not only does the historian make these omissions, -but in no subsequent allusion to Manasseh does he so much as indicate -that he is aware of his amendment.[650] He says that Amon "did evil in -the sight of the Lord, as his father Manasseh did."[651] He speaks of -the altars to the hosts of heaven which Manasseh had made in the two -courts of the Temple as still standing in the reign of Josiah, though -the Chronicler tells us that Manasseh had cast them all out of the -city.[652] He says that, notwithstanding all that Josiah did, "the -Lord turned not from the fierceness of His great wrath, because of all -the provocations that Manasseh had provoked Him withal,"[653] and that -on this account God cast off Jerusalem. Never, even by the most -distant allusions, does he refer to Manasseh's captivity, his prayer, -his penitence, or his counter-efforts. Had he been aware of these, his -silence would have been neither generous nor just. Nay, he even leaves -apparent facts at conflict with the Chronicler's story, for he makes -Josiah do all that the Chronicler tells us that Manasseh himself had -done in the removal of his worst abominations. - -Even now we have not exhausted the historic difficulties which -surround the repentance of Manasseh. During his reign Jeremiah -received his call, and while still a young boy began his work. Neither -he, nor Zephaniah, nor Habakkuk drop the slightest hint that the -wicked, idolatrous king had ever turned over a new leaf. Jeremiah's -silence is specially difficult to account for. He, too, records -Jehovah's final and irrevocable decree, that He would give up Judah to -death, to exile, and to famine, to the sword to slay, to the dogs to -tear, to the fowls of the heaven and the beasts of the earth to devour -and to destroy.[654] And the cause of the pitiless doom pronounced by -a Judge weary of repenting is "because of Manasseh, the son of -Hezekiah, King of Judah, for that which he did in Jerusalem."[655] - -The judgment was not long delayed. - -It was the vast movement of the Scythians in Media and Western Asia, -and the rumours of it, which gave to Manasseh and Amon such respite as -they had; and even this respite was full of misery and fear.[656] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[624] One legend says that Hephzibah was a daughter of Isaiah. Not so -Josephus (_Antt._, X. iii. 1). - -[625] See Gen. xli. 51. His name may have referred to the new union -between the Northern and Southern Kingdoms. Comp. 2 Chron. xxx. 6, -xxxi. 1. - -[626] Chron. xxxiv. 1-3. - -[627] See Zeph. i. 8. Comp. 2 Chron. xxiv. 17; Isa. xxviii. 14; Jer. -v. 5, etc. - -[628] Mic. vii. 1-20. - -[629] LXX., τῇ Βαά̈λ. The feminine, however, does not imply that Baal -was here worshipped as a female deity, but is probably due to the fact -that later Jews always avoided using the _names_ of idols (from a -misapprehension or too literal view of Exod. xxiii. 13), and therefore -called Baal _Bosheth_ ("shame"), which is feminine. Hence the names -Mephibosheth, Jerubbesheth, Ishbosheth. In Suidas (_s.v._ Μανασσῆς) he -is charged with having set up in the Temple "a four-faced image of -Zeus." - -[630] For בָּתִּים, in 2 Kings xxiii. 7, the LXX. read χεττίμ (?). -Grätz, (_Gesch. d. Juden._, ii. 277) suggests בְּנָדִים, "broidered -robes." Ezek. xvi. 16. See Herod., i. 199; Strabo, xvi. 1058; Luc., -_De Deâ. Syr._, § 6; Libanius, _Opp._, xi. 456, 557; _Ep. of Jeremy_, -43; Döllinger, _Judenthum u. Heidenthum_, i. 431; Rawlinson, -_Phœnicia_, 431. - -[631] Chron. xxxiii. 3; 2 Kings xxiii. 5. Movers, _Rel. d. Phöniz._, -i. 65 "In all the books of the Old Testament written before the -Assyrian period no trace of star-worship is to be to found." 2 Kings -xvii. 16. - -[632] Jer. vii. 18, viii. 2, xix. 13; Zeph. i, 5. - -[633] See Deut. iv. 19, xvii. 3. - -[634] 2 Kings xxiii. 11, 12. - -[635] See Jer. vii, 31, 32, xix. 2-6, xxxii. 35; Psalm cvi. 37, 38. - -[636] Ewald infers from Isa. lvii. 5-9; Jer. ii. 5-13, that he actually -_sought_ for all foreign kinds of worship, in order to introduce them. - -[637] 1 Sam. iii. 11; Jer. xix. 3. - -[638] Comp. Isa. xxxiv. 11; Lam. ii. 8. - -[639] 2 Kings xxi. 13. LXX., ἀλάβαστρος, _al._ πυξίον. The Vulgate -also takes it to mean the obliteration of writing on a tablet: "Delebo -Jerusalem sicut deleri solent tabulæ; et ducam crebrius stylum super -faciem ejus." - -[640] 2 Kings xxi. 16; Heb., "from mouth to mouth"; LXX., στόμα εἰς -στόμα; Vulg., _donec impleret Jerusalem usque ad os_. Comp. 2 Kings x. -21. - -[641] _Antt._, X. iii, 1: "He butchered alike all the just among the -Hebrews." To this reign of terror some refer Psalm xii. 1; Isa. lvii. -1-4. - -[642] This (as I have said) cannot be regarded as certain. Isaiah -began to prophesy in the year that King Uzziah died, sixty years -before Manasseh. It is a Jewish Haggadah. See Gesen on Isa. i., p. 9, -and the Apocryphal "Ascension of Isaiah." - -[643] Esarhaddon reigned only eight years, till 668, and then resigned -in favour of his son Assurbanipal. In his reign Psammetichus recovered -Egypt, and put an end to the Dodecarchy. In the reign of his -successor, Assuredililani, Assyria began to decline (647-625). - -[644] Comp. Isa. xxxix. 6; Jos., _Antt._, X. iii. 2. The phrase "among -the thorns" means "_with rings_" (comp. Isa. xxx. 28, xxxvii. 29; -Ezek. xxxviii. 4; Amos iv. 2). Assurbanipal says similarly that he -seized Necho, "bound him with bonds and iron chains, hands and feet," -but afterwards allowed him to return to Egypt (Schrader, ii. 59). - -[645] Late and worthless Haggadoth, echoed by still later writers -(Suidas and Syncellus), say he was kept in a brazen cage, fed on bran -bread dipped in vinegar, etc. See _Apost. Constt._, ii. 22: "And the -Lord hearkened to his voice, and there became about him a flame of -fire, and all the irons about him melted." John Damasc., _Parall._, -ii. 15, quotes from Julius Africanus, that while Manasseh was saying a -psalm his iron bonds burst, and he escaped. See _Speakers Commentary_, -on Apocrypha, ii. 363. - -[646] Such pardon from a king of Assyria was rare, but not -unparalleled. Pharaoh Necho I. was taken in chains to Nineveh, and -afterwards set free (Schrader, _K. A. T._, p. 371). - -[647] See 2 Chron. xxvii. 3. The "fish gate" was, perhaps, a weak -point (Zeph. i. 10). - -[648] 2 Chron. xxxiii. 19. Heb., _dibhrî Chozai_; A.V., "the story of -the Seers"; R.V., "in the history of Hozai"; LXX., ἐπὶ τῶν λόγων τῶν -οὐρανιῶν; Vulg., _in sermonibus Hozai_. The elements of doubt -suggested by the name "Babylon," and by the liberation of Manasseh, -have been removed by further knowledge. See Budge, _Hist. of -Esarhaddon_, p. 78; Schrader, _K. A. T._, 369 ff. - -[649] Since the Council of Trent this prayer has been relegated to the -end of the Vulgate with 3, 4, Esdras. Verse 8 (the supposed sinlessness -of the Patriarchs) at once shows it to be a mere composition. - -[650] 2 Kings xxiii. 12. - -[651] 2 Kings xxi. 20. - -[652] 2 Chron. xxxiii. 15. - -[653] 2 Kings xxiii. 26. - -[654] Jer. xv. 1-9. - -[655] The later Jews certainly took no account of his repentance. His -name was execrated (see the substitution of Manasseh for Moses in -Judg. xviii. 30), and he was denied all part in the world to come. The -Apocryphal "Prayer of Manasses" has no authority, though it is -interesting (Butler, _Analogy_, pt. ii., ch. v.). - -[656] In estimating the Chronicler's story, we cannot wholly forget the -fact that a number of Haggadic legends clustered thickly round the name -of Manasseh in the literature of the later Jews. He is charged with -incest, with the murder of Isaiah, the distortion of Scripture, etc., -and is represented as having got to heaven, not by real repentance, but -by challenging God on His superiority to idols. The Targum, after 2 -Chron. xxxiii. 11, adds, "And the Chaldees made a copper mule, and -pierced it all over with little holes, and put him therein. And when he -was in straits, he cried in vain to all his idols. Then he prayed to -Jehovah and humbled himself; but the angels shut every window and -lattice of heaven, that his prayer might not enter. But forthwith the -pity of the Lord of the world rolled forth, and He made an aperture in -heaven, and the mule burst asunder, and the Spirit breathed on him, and -he forsook all his idols." "No books," says Dr. Neubauer, "are more -subject to additions and various adaptations than popular histories." -See Mr. Ball's commentary (_Speaker's Commentary_, ii. 309, and -_Sanhedrin_, f. 99, 2; 101, 1; 103, 2). - - - - - _AMON_[657] - - B.C. 641-639 - - 2 KINGS xxi. 19-26 - -The brief reign of Amon is only a sort of unimportant and miserable -annex to that of his father. As he was twenty-two years old when he -began to reign, he must have witnessed the repentance and reforming zeal -of his father, if, in spite of all difficulties, we assume that -narrative to be historical. In that case, however, the young man was -wholly untouched by the latter phase of Manasseh's life, and flung -himself headlong into the career of the king's earlier idolatries. "He -walked in all the way that his father walked in, and served the idols -that his father served, and worshipped them"--which was the more -extraordinary if Manasseh's last acts had been to dethrone and destroy -these strange gods. He even "multiplied trespass," so that in his son's -reign we find every form of abomination as triumphant as though Manasseh -had never attempted to check the tide of evil. We know nothing more of -Amon. Apparently he only reigned two years.[658] He is the only Jewish -king who bears the name of a foreign--an Egyptian--deity. - -For pictures of the state of things in this reign we may look to the -prophets Zephaniah and Jeremiah, and they are forced to use the -darkest colours. - -This is Zephaniah's picture:-- - - "Woe to her that is rebellious and polluted, to the oppressing city! - She obeyed not the voice; she received not instruction; - She trusted not in the Lord; she drew not near to her God. - Her princes in the midst of her are roaring lions; - Her judges are evening wolves; they gnaw not the bones on the morrow. - Her prophets are light and treacherous persons: - Her priests have profaned the sanctuary, they have done violence to - the law."[659] - -He tells us that Baal and his black-robed _chemarim_[660] are still -prevalent--that men worshipped on their house-tops the host of heaven, -and swore by "Moloch their king." Therefore would God search Jerusalem -with candles, and would visit the men who had sunk, like thick wine on -the lees, and who said in their infidel hearts, "Jehovah will not do -good, neither will He do evil." He is an Epicurean God, a cypher, a -_fainéant_. "Men make all kinds of fine calculations," says Luther, -"but the Lord God says to them, 'For whom, then, do you hold Me? For a -cypher? Do I sit here in vain, and to no purpose? You shall know that -I will turn their accounts about finely, and make them all false -reckonings.'" - -Not less dark is the view of Jeremiah.[661] Like Diogenes in Athens, -Jeremiah in vain searches Jerusalem for a faithful man. Among the poor -he finds brutish obstinacy, among the rich insolent defiance. They -were like fed horses in the morning--lecherous and unruly. They are -slanderers, adulterers, corrupters, murderers. They worship Baal and -strange gods. "They set a trap, they catch men. As a cage is full of -birds, so are their houses full of deceit. They are waxen fat, they -shine; yea, they overpass in deeds of wickedness."[662] "An -astonishment and horror is done in the land; the prophets prophesy -falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and My people love -to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?"[663] - -"From the least of them even unto the greatest of them every one is -given to covetousness; and from the prophet even unto the priest every -one dealeth falsely. They have treated also the hurt of My people -lightly, saying, 'Peace, peace,' when there is no peace. Were they -ashamed when they had committed abominations? Nay, they were not at -all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore shall they fall among -them that fall."[664] - -The wretched reign ended wretchedly. Amon met the fate of Amaziah and -of Joash. He was murdered by conspirators--by some of his own -courtiers--in his own palace. He was not the victim of any general -rebellion. The people of the land were apparently content with the -existent idolatry, which left them free for lives of lust and luxury, -of greed and gain. They resented the disorder introduced by an -intrigue of eunuchs or court officials. They rose and slew the whole -band of conspirators. Amon was buried with his father in the new -burial-place of the Kings in the garden of Uzza, and the people placed -his son Josiah--a child of eight years old--upon the throne. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[657] The name Amon is unusual. Some identify it with the name of the -Egyptian sun-god (Nah. iii. 8). If so, we see yet another element of -Manasseh's syncretism, and (as some fancy) an attempt to open -relations with Psammetichus of Egypt. But perhaps the name may be -Hebrew for "Architect" (1 Kings xxii. 26; Neh. vii. 59). - -[658] 2 Kings xxi. 19. The LXX. reads "twelve years," but not so -Josephus (_Antt._, X. iv. 1), or 2 Chron. xxxiii. 21. - -[659] Zeph. iii. 1-11. Comp. i. 4. - -[660] _Chemarim_, 2 Kings xxiii. 5; Hos. x. 5. The root in Syriac -means "to be sad," but Kimchi derives it from a root "to be black." -The Vulgate renders it _æditui_ and _aruspices_. - -[661] We are told in the titles of their books that both these -prophets prophesied in the days of Josiah; but such pictures can only -apply to the earliest years of his reign. - -[662] See Jer. v., vi., vii., _passim_. - -[663] Jer. vi. 13-15. - -[664] Jer. v. 30, 31. - - - - - CHAPTER XXX - - _JOSIAH_ - - B.C. 639-608[665] - - 2 KINGS xii., xxiii - - "Τὴν δὲ φύσιν αὐτὸς ἄριστος ὑπῆρχε καὶ πρὸς ἀρετὴν εὗ - γεγονώς."--Jos., _Antt._, iv. 1. - - "In outline dim and vast - Their fearful shadows cast - The giant forms of Empires, on their way - To ruin: one by one - They tower, and they are gone." - KEBLE. - - -If we are to understand the reign of Josiah as a whole, we must preface -it by some allusion to the great epoch-marking circumstances of his age, -which explain the references of contemporary prophets, and which, in -great measure, determined the foreign policy of the pious king. - -The three memorable events of this brief epoch were, (I.) the movement -of the Scythians, (II.) the rise of Babylon, and (III.) the -humiliation of Nineveh, followed by her total destruction. - -I. Many of Jeremiah's earlier prophecies belong to this period, and we -see that both he and Zephaniah--who was probably a great-great-grandson -of King Hezekiah himself,[666] and prophesied in this reign[667]--are -greatly occupied with a danger from the North which seems to threaten -universal ruin. - -So overwhelming is the peril that Zephaniah begins with the -tremendously sweeping menace, "_I will utterly consume all things off -the earth_, saith the Lord." - -Then the curse rushes down specifically upon Judah and Jerusalem; and -the state of things which the prophet describes shows that, if Josiah -began himself to seek the Lord at eight years old, he did not -take--and was, perhaps, unable to take--any active steps towards the -extinction of idolatry till he was old enough to hold in his own hand -the reins of power. - -For Zephaniah denounces the wrath of Jehovah on three classes of -idolaters--viz., (1) the remnant of Baal-worshippers with their -_chemarim_, or unlawful priests, and the syncretising priests -(_kohanim_) of Jehovah, who combine His worship with that of the stars, -to whom they burn incense upon the housetops; (2) the waverers, who -swear at once by Jehovah and by Malcham, their king; and (3) the open -despisers and apostates. For all these the day of Jehovah is near; He -has prepared them for sacrifice, and the sacrificers are at hand.[668] -Gaza, Ashdod, Askelon, Ekron, the Cherethites, Canaan, Philistia, are -all threatened by the same impending ruin, as well as Moab and Ammon, -who shall lose their lands. Ethiopia, too, and Assyria shall be smitten, -and Nineveh shall become so complete a desolation that "pelicans and -hedgehogs shall bivouac upon her chapiters, the owl shall hoot in her -windows, and the crow croak upon the threshold, 'Crushed! desolated!' -and all that pass by shall hiss and wag their hands."[669] - -The pictures of the state of society drawn by Jeremiah do not, as we -have seen, differ from those drawn by his contemporary.[670] Jeremiah, -too, writing perhaps before Josiah's reformation, complains that God's -people have forsaken the fountains of living water, to hew out for -themselves broken cisterns. He complains of empty formalism in the place -of true righteousness, and even goes so far as to say that backsliding -Israel has shown herself more righteous than treacherous Judah (iii. -1-11). He, too, prophesies speedy and terrific chastisement. Let Judah -gather herself into fenced cities, and save her goods by flight, for God -is bringing evil from the North, and a great destruction.[671] - -"The lion is come up from his thicket, and the destroyer of the -nations is on his way; he is gone forth from his place to make thy -land desolate; and thy cities shall be laid waste, without an -inhabitant. Behold, he cometh as clouds, and his chariots shall be as -the whirlwind." Besiegers come from a far country, and give out their -voice against the cities of Judah. The heart of the kings shall -perish, and the heart of the princes; and the priests shall be -astonished, and the prophets shall wonder. - -"For thus hath the Lord said, The whole land shall be desolate; yet -will I not make a full end"--and, "O Jerusalem, wash thine heart from -wickedness, that thou mayest be saved!"[672] - -"I will bring a nation upon you from far, O House of Israel, saith the -Lord: it is a mighty nation, it is an ancient nation, a nation whose -language"--unlike that of the Assyrians--"thou knowest not, neither -understandest what they say. Their quiver is an open sepulchre, they -are all mighty men. They shall batter thy fenced cities, in which thou -trustest with weapons of war."[673] - -"O ye children of Benjamin, save your goods by flight: for evil is -imminent from the North, and a great destruction. Behold, a people -cometh from the North Country, and a great nation shall be raised from -the farthest part of the earth. They lay hold on bow and spear; they are -cruel, and have no mercy; their voice roareth like the sea; and they -ride upon horses, set in array as men for war against thee, O daughter -of Zion. We have heard the fame thereof: our hands wax feeble."[674] - -And the judgment is close at hand. The early blossoming bud of the -almond tree is the type of its imminence. The seething caldron, with -its front turned from the North, typifies an invasion which shall soon -boil over and flood the land.[675] - -What was the fierce people thus vaguely indicated as coming from the -North? The foes indicated in these passages are not the long-familiar -Assyrians, but the Scythians and Cimmerians.[676] - -As yet the Hebrews had only heard of them by dim and distant rumour. -When Ezekiel prophesied they were still an object of terror, but he -foresees their defeat and annihilation. They should be gathered into -the confines of Israel, but only for their destruction.[677] The -prophet is bidden to set his face towards Gog, of the land of Magog, -the Prince of Rosh,[678] Meshech, and Tubal, and prophesy against him -that God would turn him about, and put hooks in his jaws, and drive -forth all his army of bucklered and sworded horsemen, the hordes of -the uttermost part of the North. They should come like a storm upon -the mountains of Israel, and spoil the defenceless villages; but they -should come simply for their own destruction by blood and by -pestilence. God should smite their bows out of their left hands, and -their arrows out of the right, and the ravenous birds of Israel should -feed upon the carcases of their warriors. There should be endless -bonfires of all the instruments of war, and the place of their burial -should be called "the valley of the multitude of Gog." - -Much of this is doubtless an ideal picture, and Ezekiel may be -thinking of the fall of the Chaldæans. But the terms he uses remind us -of the dim Northern nomads, and the names Rosh and Meshech in -juxtaposition involuntarily recall those of Russia and Moscow.[679] - -Our chief historical authority respecting this influx of Northern -barbarians is Herodotus.[680] He tells us that the nomad Scythians, -apparently a Turanian race, who may have been subjected to the pressure -of population, swarmed over the Caucasus, dispossessed the Cimmerians -(Gomer), and settled themselves in Saccasene, a province of Northern -Armenia. From this province the Scythians gained the name of the Saquî. -The name of Gog seems to be taken from Gugu, a Scythian prince, who was -taken captive by Assurbanipal from the land of the Saquî.[681] Magog is -perhaps Mat-gugu, "land of Gog." These rude, coarse warriors, like the -hordes of Attila, or Zenghis Khan, or Tamerlane--who were descended from -them--magnetised the imagination of civilised people, as the Huns did in -the fourth century.[682] They overthrew the kingdom of Urartis -(Armenia), and drove the all-but exterminated remnant of the Moschi and -Tabali to the mountain-fortresses by the Black Sea, turning them, as it -were, into a nation of ghosts in Sheol.[683] Then they burst like a -thunder-cloud on Mesopotamia, desolating the villages with their -arrow-flights, but too unskilled to take fenced towns. They swept down -the Shephelah of Palestine, and plundered the rich temple of Aphrodite -(Astarte Ourania) at Askelon, thereby incurring the curse of the goddess -in the form of a strange disease. But on the borders of Egypt they were -diplomatically met by Psammetichus (_d._ 611) with gifts and prayers. -Judah seems only to have suffered indirectly from this invasion. The -main army of Scyths poured down the maritime plain, and there was no -sufficient booty to tempt any but their straggling bands to the barren -hills of Judah.[684] It was the report of this over-flooding from the -North which probably evoked the alarming prophecies of Zephaniah and -Jeremiah, though they found their clearer fulfilment in the invasion of -the Chaldees. - -II. This rush of wild nomads averted for a time the fate of Nineveh. - -The Medes, an Aryan people, had settled south of the Caspian, B.C. -790; and in the same century one of these tribes--the Persians--had -settled south-east of Elam the northern coast of the Persian Gulf. -Cyaxares founded the Median Empire, and attacked Nineveh. The Scythian -invasion forced him to abandon the siege, and the Scythians burnt the -Assyrian palace and plundered the ruins. But Cyaxares succeeded in -intoxicating and murdering the Scythian leaders at a banquet, and -bribed the army to withdraw. Then Cyaxares, with the aid of the -Babylonians under Nabopolassar their rebel viceroy, besieged and took -Nineveh--probably about B.C. 608--while its last king and his captains -were revelling at a banquet.[685] - -The fall of Nineveh was not astonishing. The empire had long been -"slowly bleeding to death" in consequence of its incessant wars. The -city deemed itself impregnable behind walls a hundred feet high, on -which three chariots could drive abreast, and mantled with twelve -hundred towers; but she perished, and all the nations--whom she had -known how to crush, but had with "her stupid and cruel tyranny" never -known how to govern--shouted for joy. That joy finds its triumphant -expression in more than one of the prophets, but specially in the -vivid pæan of Nahum. His date is approximately fixed at about B.C. -660, by his reference to the atrocities inflicted by Assurbanipal on -the Egyptian city of No-Amon. "Art thou [Nineveh] better," he asks, -"than No-Amon, that was situate among the canals, that had the water -round about her, whose rampart was the Nile, and her wall was the -waters? Yet she went into captivity! Her young children were dashed to -pieces at the head of all the streets: they cast lots for her -honourable men, and all her great men were bound in chains. Thou also -shalt be drunken: thou shalt faint away, thou shalt seek a stronghold -because of the enemy."[686] - -All the details of her fall are dim; but Nineveh was, in the language -of the prophets, swept with the besom of destruction. Her ruins became -stones of emptiness, and the line of confusion was stretched over her. -Nahum ends with the cry,-- - - "There is no assuaging of thy hurt; thy wound is grievous: - All that hear the bruit of this, clap the hands over thee: - For upon whom hath thy wickedness not passed continually?" - -In truth, Assyria, the ferocious foe of Israel, of Judah, and all the -world, vanished suddenly, like a dream when one awaketh;[687] and those -who passed over its ruins, like Xenophon and his Ten Thousand in B.C. -401, knew not what they were.[688] Her very name had become forgotten in -two centuries. "_Etiam periere ruinæ!_" The burnt relics and cracked -tablets of her former splendour began to be revealed to the world once -more in 1842, and it is only during the last quarter of a century that -the fragments of her history have been laboriously deciphered. - -III. Such were the events witnessed in their germs or in their -completion by the contemporaries of Josiah and the prophets who -adorned his reign. It was during this period, also, that the power to -whom the ultimate ruin and captivity of Jerusalem was due sprang into -formidable proportions. The ultimate scourge of God to the guilty -people and the guilty city was not to be the Assyrian, nor the -Scythian, nor the Egyptian, nor any of the old Canaanite or Semitic -foes of Israel, nor the Phœnician, nor the Philistine. With all these -she had long contended, and held her own. It was before the Chaldee -that she was doomed to fall, and the Chaldee was a new phenomenon of -which the existence had hardly been recognised as a danger till the -warning prophecy of Isaiah to Hezekiah after the embassy of the rebel -viceroy Merodach-Baladan.[689] - -It is to Habakkuk, in prophecies written very shortly after the death -of Josiah, that we must look for the impression of terror caused by -the Chaldees. - -Nabopolassar,[690] sent by the successor of Assurbanipal to quell a -Chaldæan revolt, seized the viceroyalty of Babylon, and joined Cyaxares -in the overthrow of Nineveh. From that time Babylon became greater and -more terrible than Nineveh, whose power it inherited. Habakkuk (ii. -1-19) paints the rapacity, the selfishness, the inflated ambition, the -cruelty, the drunkenness, the idolatry of the Chaldæans. He calls them -(i. 5-11) a rough and restless nation, frightful and terrible, whose -horsemen were swifter than leopards, fiercer than evening wolves, flying -to gorge on prey like the vultures, mocking at kings and princes, and -flinging dust over strongholds. Nor has he the least comfort in looking -on their resistless fury, except the deeply significant oracle--an -oracle which contains the secret of their ultimate doom-- - - "Behold, his soul is puffed up; it is not upright in him: - But the righteous man shall live by his fidelity." - -The prophet places absolute reliance on the general principle that -"pride and violence dig their own grave."[691] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[665] Kamphausen (_Die Chronologie der hebräischer Könige_) makes -Josiah succeed to the throne in 638. - -[666] Otherwise his genealogy would not be mentioned for four -generations (Hitzig). - -[667] Zeph. i. 1. Jeremiah also was highly connected. He was a priest -and his father Hilkiah may be the high priest who found the book; "for -his uncle Shallum, father of his cousin Hanameel, was the husband of -Huldah the prophetess" (2 Kings xxii. 14; Jer. xxxii. 7). The fact -that Jeremiah's property was at Anathoth, where lived the descendants -of Ithamar (1 Kings ii. 26), whereas Hilkiah was of the family of -Eleazar (1 Chron. vi. 4-13), does not seem fatal to the view that his -father was the high priest. - -[668] Zeph. ii. 4-7. - -[669] Zeph. ii. 12-15. - -[670] Jer. ii. 1-35. Considering the very great part played by -Jeremiah for nearly half a century of the last history of Judah, the -non-mention of his name in the Book of Kings is a circumstance far -from easy to explain. - -[671] Jer. iv. 6, A. V., "retire, stay not." Comp. Isa. x. 24-31. - -[672] Jer. iv. 7-27. - -[673] Jer. v. 15-17. - -[674] Jer. vi. 1, 22, 23, 24. - -[675] The almond tree (_shâqâd_) "seems to be awake (_shâqâd_), -whatsoever trees are still sleeping in the torpor of winter" (Tristram -_Nat. Hist. of the Bible_, 332; Jer. i. 11-14). - -[676] The name Kimmerii (on the Assyrian inscriptions Gimirrai) is -connected with Gomer. The Persians call them Sakai or Scyths. The -nomad Scyths had driven the Kimmerii from the Dniester while -Psammetichus was King of Egypt. For allusions to this see Jer. vi. 22 -_seq._, viii. 16, ix. 10. The first notice of them is in an -inscription of Esarhaddon, B.C. 677, who says that he defeated -"Tiushpa, _the Gimirrai, a roving warrior_, whose own country was -remote." Zephaniah and Jeremiah were certainly thinking of the -Scythians (Eichhorn, Hitzig, Ewald; and more recently Kuenen, -_Onderzoek_, ii. 123; Wellhausen, _Skizzen_, 150). In B.C. 626 they -could not have consciously had the Chaldæans in view, though, -twenty-three years later, Jeremiah may have had. - -[677] See Ezek. xxxviii., xxxix. - -[678] Ezek. xxxviii. 2. So Gesenius, Hävernick, etc., and R.V. - -[679] The form in the Vulgate and the Alexandrian MS. of the LXX. is -Mosech; in the Assyrian inscription, Muski. As far back as 1120 -Tiglath-Pileser I. had overrun Tubal (the Tublai, Tabareni) and -Moschi, between the Black Sea and the Taurus. They were neither Aryans -nor Semites. In Gen. x. 2; 1 Chron. i. 5, Gog, Magog, Meshech, and -Gomer are sons of Japheth. They are referred to in Rev. xx. 8. - -[680] Herod., i. 74, 103-106, iv. 1-22, vii. 64; Pliny, _H. N._, v. -16; Jos., _Antt._, I. vi. 1; Syncellus, _Chronogl._, i. 405. - -[681] Sayce, _Ethnology of the Bible; Records of the Past_, ix. 40; -Schrader, _K. A. T._, 159. Some identify Gog with Gyges, King of -Lydia, who was killed in battle _against_ the Scythians, but whose -name stood for a geographical symbol of Asia Minor, sometimes called -Lud. It is said that in 665 Gyges (Gugu) sent two Scythian chiefs as a -present to Nineveh. - -[682] Hence, in 2 Macc. iv. 47, 3 Macc. vii. 5, Scythian is used with -the modern connotation of "Barbarian." - -[683] Ezek. xxxii. 26, 27; Cheyne, _Jeremiah_ ("Men of the Bible") p. -31. - -[684] _Expositor_, 2nd series, iv. 263; Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, 31. Hitzig -and Ewald (erroneously?) refer Psalms lv., lix., to these events, and -it seems also to be an error to suppose that the later name of -Bethshan--Scythopolis--has anything to do with this incursion. Like -the names of Pella, Philadelphia, etc., it is later than the age of -Alexander the Great. See 2 Macc. xii. 30; Jos., _B. J._, II. xviii., -_Vit._ vi. Perhaps Scythopolis is a corruption of Sikytopolis, the -city of Sikkuth; or Scythian may merely stand for "Barbarian," as in 3 -Macc. vii. 5; Col. iii. 11 (Cheyne, _l.c._). - -[685] Nah. i. 10, ii. 5, iii. 12; Diod. Sic., ii. 26. - -[686] Nah. iii. 8-11. - -[687] Strabo, xvi. 1, 3: ἠφανίσθη παοαχρῆμα. - -[688] Xen., _Anab._, III. iv. 7. - -[689] Chaldees, Kardim, Kasdim, Kurds. - -[690] Nabu-pal-ussur, "Nebo protect the son" B.C. 625-7. Jos., _Antt._ -X. xi. 1: comp. _Ap._, i. 19. - -[691] Newman, _Hebrew Monarchy_, p. 315. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXI - - _JOSIAH'S REFORMATION_ - - 2 KINGS xxii. 8-20, xxiii. 1-25 - - "And the works of Josias were upright before his Lord with a heart - full of godliness."--1 ESDRAS i. 23. - - "From Zion shall go forth the Law, and the Word of the Lord from - Jerusalem."--ISA. ii. 3. - - -It is from the Prophets--Zephaniah, Jeremiah, Nahum, Habakkuk, -Ezekiel--that we catch almost our sole glimpses of the vast -world-movements of the nations which must have loomed large on the -minds of the King of Judah and of all earnest politicians in that day. -As they did not directly affect the destiny of Judah till the end of -the reign, they do not interest the historian of the Kings or the -later Chronicler. The things which rendered the reign memorable in -their eyes were chiefly two--the finding of "the Book of the Law" in -the House of the Lord, and the consequent religious reformation. - -It is with the first of these two events that we must deal in the -present chapter. - -Josiah began to reign as a child of eight, and it may be that the -emphatic and honourable mention of his mother--Jedidah ("Beloved"), -daughter of Adaiah of Boscath--may be due to the fact that he owed to -her training that early proclivity to faithfulness which earns for him -the unique testimony, that he not only "walked in the way of David his -father," but that "he turned not aside to the right hand or to the -left." - -At first, of course, as a mere child, he could take no very active -steps. The Chronicler says that at sixteen he began to show his -devotion, and at twenty set himself the task of purging Judah and -Jerusalem from the taint of idols. Things were in a bad condition, as we -see from the bitter complaints and denunciations of Zephaniah and -Jeremiah. Idolatry of the worst description was still openly tolerated. -But Josiah was supported by a band of able and faithful advisers. -Shaphan, grandfather of the unhappy Gedaliah--afterwards the Chaldæan -viceroy over conquered Judah--was scribe; Hilkiah, the son of Shallum -and the ancestor of Ezra, was the high priest.[692] By them the king was -assisted, fist in the obliteration of the prevalent emblems of idolatry, -and then in the purification of the Temple. Two centuries and a half had -elapsed since it had been last repaired by Joash, and it must have -needed serious restoration during long years of neglect in the reigns of -Ahaz, of Manasseh, and of Amon. Subscriptions were collected from the -people by "the keepers of the door," and were freely entrusted to the -workmen and their overseers, who employed them faithfully in the objects -for which they were designed.[693] - -The repairs led to an event of momentous influence on all future time. -During the cleansing of the Temple Hilkiah came to Shaphan, and said, "I -have found the Book of the Law in the House of the Lord." Perhaps the -copy of the book had been placed by some priest's hand beside the Ark, -and had been discovered during the removal of the rubbish which neglect -had there accumulated. Shaphan read the book; and when next he had to -see the king to tell him about the progress of the repairs, he said to -him, "Hilkiah the priest hath handed me a book." Josiah bade him read -some of it aloud. It is evident that he read the curses contained in -Deut. xxviii. They horrified the pious monarch; for all that they -contained, and the laws to which they were appended, were wholly new to -him. He might well be amazed that a code so solemn, and purporting to -have emanated from Moses, should, in spite of maledictions so fearful, -have become an absolute dead letter. In deep alarm he sent the priest, -the scribe Shaphan, with his son Ahikam, and Abdon, the son of Micaiah, -and Asahiah, a court official, to inquire of Jehovah, whose great anger -could not but be kindled against king and people by the obliteration and -nullity of His law. They consulted Huldah, the only prophetess mentioned -in the Old Testament, except Miriam and Deborah.[694] She was the wife -of Shallum and keeper of the priests' robes,[695] and she lived in the -suburbs of the city.[696] Her answer was an uncompromising menace. All -the curses which the king had heard against the place and people should -be pitilessly fulfilled,--only, as the king had showed a tender heart, -and had humbled himself before Jehovah, he should go to his own grave in -peace.[697] - -Thereupon the king summoned to the Temple a great assembly of priests, -prophets, and all the people, and, standing by the pillar (or "on the -platform")[698] in the entrance of the inner court, read "all the -words of the Book of the Covenant which had been found in the House of -the Lord" in their ears, and joined with them in "the covenant" to -obey the hitherto unknown or totally forgotten laws which were -inculcated in the newly discovered volume. - -Immediate action followed. The priests were ordered to bring out of the -Temple all the vessels made for Baal, for the Asherah, and for the host -of heaven; they were burnt outside Jerusalem in the Valley of Kedron, -and their ashes taken to Bethel.[699] The _chemarim_ of the high places -were suppressed, as well as all other idolatrous priests who burnt -incense to the signs of the Zodiac, the Hyades, and the heavenly -bodies.[700] The Asherah itself was taken out of the Temple, and it is -truly amazing that we should find it there so late in Josiah's reign. He -burnt it in the Kedron, stamped it to powder, and scattered the powder -"on the graves of the common people." The Chronicler says "on the graves -of them that had sacrificed" to the idols[701];--but this is an -inexplicable statement, since it is (as Professor Lumby says) very -improbable that idolaters had a separate burial-place. It is equally -shocking, and to us incomprehensible, to read that the houses of the -degraded _Qedeshim_ still stood, not "by the Temple" (A.V.), but "_in_ -the Temple,"[702] and that in these houses, or chambers, the women still -"wove embroideries[703] for the Asherah." What was Hilkiah doing? If the -priests of the _high places_ were so guilty from Geba to Beersheba, did -no responsibility attach to the high priest and other priests of the -Temple who permitted the existence of these enormities, not only in the -_bamoth_ at the city gates,[704] but in the very courts of the mountain -of the Lord's House? If the priests of the immemorial shrines were -degraded from their prerogatives, and were not allowed to come up to the -altar of Jehovah in Jerusalem, by what law of justice were they to be -regarded as so immeasurably inferior to the highest members of their own -order, who, for years together, had permitted the worship of a wooden -phallic emblem, and the existence of the worst heathen abominations -within the very Temple of the Lord? Every honest reader must admit that -there are inexplicable difficulties and uncertainties in these ancient -histories, and that our knowledge of the exact circumstances--especially -in all that regards the priests and Levites, who, in the Chronicles, are -their own ecclesiastical historians--must remain extremely imperfect. - -And what can be meant by the clause that the degraded priests of the -old high places, though they were not allowed to serve at the great -altar, yet "did eat of the _unleavened bread_ among their brethren"? -Unleavened bread was only eaten at the Passover; and when there _was_ -a Passover, was eaten by all alike. Perhaps the reading for -"unleavened bread" should be (priestly) "portions"--a reading found by -Geiger in an old manuscript. - -Continuing his work, Josiah defiled Tophet;[705] took away the horses -given by the kings of Judah to the sun, which were stabled beside the -chamber of the eunuch Nathan-Melech in the precincts;[706] and burnt -the sun-chariots in the fire. He removed the altars to the stars on -the roof of the upper chamber of Ahaz,[707] and ground them to powder. -He also destroyed those of his grandfather Manasseh in the two Temple -courts--which we supposed to have been removed by Manasseh in his -repentance--and threw the dust into the Kedron. He defiled the -idolatrous shrines reared by Solomon to the deities of Sidon, Ammon, -and Moloch, broke the pillars, cut down the Asherim, and filled their -places with dead men's bones.[708] Travelling northwards, he burnt, -destroyed, and stamped to powder the altars and the Asherim at Bethel, -and burnt upon the altars the remains found in the sepulchres,[709] -only leaving undisturbed the remains of the old prophet from Judah, -and of the prophet of Samaria.[710] He then destroyed the other -Samaritan shrines, exercising an undisputed authority over the -Northern Kingdom. The mixed inhabitants did not interfere with his -proceedings; and in the declining fortunes of Nineveh, the Assyrian -viceroy--if there was one--did not dispute his authority. Lastly, in -accordance with the fierce injunction of Deut. xvii. 2-5, "he slew all -the priests of the high places" on their own altars, burnt men's bones -upon them, and returned to Jerusalem. - -It is very difficult, with the milder notions which we have learnt -from the spirit of the Gospel, to look with approval on the -recrudescence of the Elijah-spirit displayed by the last proceeding. -But many centuries were to elapse, even under the Gospel Dispensation, -before men learnt the sacred principle of the early Christians that -"violence is hateful to God." Josiah must be judged by a more lenient -judgment, and he was obeying a mandate found in the new Book of the -Law. But the question arises whether the fierce commands of -Deuteronomy were ever intended to be taken _au pied de la lettre_. May -not Deut. xiii. 6-18 have been intended to express in a concrete but -ideal form the spirit of execration to be entertained towards -idolatry? Perhaps in thinking so we are only guilty of an anachronism, -and are applying to the seventh century before Christ the feelings of -the nineteenth century after Christ. - -After this Josiah ordered the people to keep a Deuteronomic Passover, -such as we are told--and as all the circumstances prove--had not been -kept from the days of the Judges. The Chronicler revels in the details -of this Passover, and tells us that Josiah gave the people thirty -thousand lambs and kids, and three thousand bullocks; and his priests -gave two thousand six hundred small cattle, and three hundred oxen; -and the chief of the Levites gave the Levites five thousand small -cattle, and five hundred oxen. He goes on to describe the slaying, -sprinkling of blood, flaying, roasting, boiling in pots, pans, and -caldrons, and attention paid to the burnt-offerings and the fat;[711] -but neither the historians nor the chroniclers, either here or -anywhere else, say one word about the Day of Atonement, or seem aware -of its existence. It belongs to the Post-Exilic Priestly Code, and is -not alluded to in the Book of Deuteronomy. - -Continuing his task, he put away them that had familiar spirits -(_oboth_), and the wizards, and the _teraphim_, with a zeal shown by -no king before or after him; but Jehovah "turned not from the -fierceness of His anger, because of all the provocations which -Manasseh had provoked Him withal." Evil, alas! is more diffusive, and -in some senses more permanent, than good, because of the perverted -bias of human nature. Judah and Jerusalem had been radically corrupted -by the apostate son of Hezekiah, and it may be that the sudden and -high-handed reformation enforced by his grandson depended too -exclusively on the external impulse given to it by the king to produce -deep effects in the hearts of the people. Certain it is that even -Jeremiah--though he was closely connected with the finders of the -book, had perhaps been present when the solemn league and covenant was -taken in the Temple, and lived through the reformation in which he -probably took a considerable part--was profoundly dissatisfied with -the results. It is sad and singular that such should have been the -case; for in the first flush of the new enthusiasm he had written, -"Cursed be the man that heareth not the words of this covenant, which -I commanded your fathers in the day that I brought them forth out of -the land of Egypt, saying, 'Obey My voice.'"[712] Nay, it has been -inferred that he was even an itinerant preacher of the newly found -law; for he writes: "And the Lord said unto me, 'Proclaim all these -words in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem, saying, -Hear ye the words of this covenant, and do them.'"[713] - -The style of Deuteronomy, as is well known, shows remarkable -affinities with the style of Jeremiah. Yet it is clear that after the -death of Josiah the prophet became utterly disillusioned with the -outcome of the whole movement. It proved itself to be at once -evanescent and unreal. The people would not give up their beloved -local shrines.[714] The law, as Habakkuk says (i. 4), became torpid; -judgment went not forth to victory; the wicked compassed about the -righteous, and judgment was perverted. It was easy to obey the -external regulations of Deuteronomy; it was far more difficult to be -true to its noble moral precepts. The reformation of Josiah, so -violent and radical, proved to be only skin-deep; and Jeremiah, with -bitter disappointment, found it to be so. External decency might be -improved, but rites and forms are nothing to Him who searcheth the -heart.[715] There was, in fact, an inherent danger in the place -assumed by the newly discovered book. "Since it was regarded as a -State authority, there early arose a kind of book-science, with its -pedantic pride and erroneous learned endeavours to interpret and apply -the Scriptures. At the same time there arose also a new kind of -hypocrisy and idolatry of the letter, through the new protection which -the State gave to the religion of the book acknowledged by the law. -Thus scholastic wisdom came into conflict with genuine prophecy."[716] - -How entirely the improvement of outward worship failed to improve men's -hearts the prophet testifies.[717] "The sin of Judah," he says, "is -written with a pen of iron, and with the point of a diamond: it is -graven upon the tablets of their hearts, and upon the horns of their -altars, and their Asherim by the green trees[718] upon the high hills. O -My mountain in the field, I will cause thee to serve thine enemies in -the land thou knowest not: for ye have kindled a fire in Mine eyes, -which shall burn for ever." While Josiah lived this apostasy was secret; -but as soon as he died the people "turned again to folly,"[719] and -committed all the old idolatries except the worship of Moloch. There -arose a danger lest even the moderate ritualism of Deuteronomy should be -perverted and exaggerated into mere formality. In the energy of his -indignation against this abuse, Jeremiah has to uplift his voice against -any trust even in the most decided injunctions of this newly discovered -law. He was "a second Amos upon a higher platform." The Deuteronomic Law -did not as yet exhibit the concentrated sacerdotalism and ritualism -which mark the Priestly Code, to which it is far superior in every way. -It is still prophetic in its tone. It places social interests above -rubrics of worship. It expresses the fundamental religious thought "that -Jehovah is in no sense inaccessible; that He can be approached -immediately by all, and without sacerdotal intervention; that He asks -nothing for Himself, but asks it as a religious duty that man should -render unto man what is right; that His Will lies not in any known -height, but in the moral sphere which is known and understood by -all."[720] The book ordained certain sacrifices; yet Jeremiah says with -startling emphasis, "To what purpose cometh there to Me frankincense -from Sheba, and the sweet calamus from a far country? Your -burnt-offerings are not acceptable, nor your sacrifices pleasant unto -Me."[721] Therefore He bids them, "Put your burnt-offerings to your -sacrifices, and eat them as flesh"--_i.e._, "Throw all your offerings -into a mass, and eat them at your pleasure (regardless of sacerdotal -rules): they have neither any inherent sanctity nor any secondary -importance from the characters of the offerers."[722] And in a still -more remarkable passage, "_For I spake not unto your fathers, nor -commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, -concerning burnt-offerings and sacrifices_: but this thing I commanded -them, saying, 'Obey My voice.'"[723] - -Nay, in the most emphatic ordinances of Deuteronomy he found that the -people had created a new peril. They were putting a particularistic -trust in Jehovah, as though He were a respecter of persons, and they -His favourites. They fancied, as in the days of Micah, that it was -enough for them to claim His name, and bribe Him with sacrifices.[724] -Above all, they boasted of and relied upon the possession of His -Temple, and placed their trust on the punctual observance of external -ceremonies. All these sources of vain confidence it was the duty of -Jeremiah rudely to shatter to pieces. Standing at the gates of the -Lord's House, he cried: "Trust ye not in lying words, saying, 'The -Temple of the Lord! the Temple of the Lord! the Temple of the Lord, -are these!' Behold, ye trust in lying words, that cannot profit. Will -ye steal, murder, commit adultery, swear falsely, burn incense unto -Baal, and walk after other gods; and come and stand before Me in this -house, whereupon My name is called, and say, 'We are delivered,' that -ye may do all these abominations? Is this house become a den of -robbers in your eyes? But go ye now to My place which was in Shiloh, -where I caused My name to dwell at the first, and see what I did to it -for the wickedness of My people. I will do unto this house as I have -done to Shiloh; and I will cast you out of My sight, as I have cast -out the whole house of Ephraim."[725]--Yet all hope was not -extinguished for ever. The Scythian might disappear; the Babylonian -might come in his place; but one day there should be a new covenant of -pardon and restitution; and as had been promised in Deuteronomy, -"_all_ should know Jehovah, from the least to the greatest." - -At last he even prophesies the entire future annulment of the solemn -covenant made on the basis of Deuteronomy, and says that Jehovah will -make a new covenant with His people, not according to the covenant -which He made with their fathers.[726] And in his final estimate of -King Josiah after his death, he does not so much as mention his -reformation, his iconoclasm, his sweeping zeal, or his enforcement of -the Deuteronomic Law, but only says to Jehoiakim:-- - -"'Did not thy father eat and drink, and do judgment and justice?--then -it was well with him. He judged the cause of the poor and needy; then -it was well. _Was not this to know Me?' saith the Lord_."[727] - -Whether because its methods were too violent, or because it only -affected the surface of men's lives, or because the people were not -really ripe for it, or because no reformation can ever succeed which -is enforced by autocracy, not spread by persuasion and conviction, it -is certain that the first glamour of Josiah's movement ended in -disillusionment. A religion violently imposed from without as a -state-religion naturally tends to hypocrisy and externalism. What -Jehovah required was, not a changed method of worship, but a changed -heart; and this the reformation of Josiah did not produce. It has -often been so in human history. Failure seems to be written on many of -the most laudable human efforts. Nevertheless, truth ultimately -prevails. Isaiah was murdered, and Urijah, and Jeremiah. Savonarola -was burnt, and Huss, and many a martyr more; but the might of -priestcraft was at last crippled, to be revived, we hope, no more, -either by open violence or secret apostasy. - - "Then to side with Truth is noble, when we share her wretched - crust, - Ere her cause bring fame and profit, and 'tis prosperous to - be just; - Then it is the brave man chooses, while the coward stands - aside, - Doubting in his abject spirit till his Lord is crucified, - And the multitude make virtue of the faith they have denied." - -FOOTNOTES: - -[692] 2 Kings xxiii. 4. We have here the first mention of "the second -priest" (if, with Grätz, we read _Cohen mishneh_, as in 2 Kings xxv. -18; Jer. lii. 24). In later days he was called "the Sagan." At this -time he probably acted as "Captain of the Temple" (Grätz, ii. 319). - -[693] Comp. 2 Kings xii. 15, where we find the same remark. - -[694] Exod. xv. 20; Judg. iv. 4; Isa. viii. 3. "The prophetess" seems -to mean "prophet's wife." Noadiah was a false prophetess. - -[695] Exod. xxviii. 2, etc. - -[696] 2 Kings xxii. 14. Heb., _mishneh_, lit. "second"; A.V., "the -college"; R.V., "the second quarter." Perhaps it means "the lower -city" (Neh. xi. 9; Zeph. i. 10). It puzzled the LXX.: ἐν τῇ μασενᾷ. -Vulg., _in secunda_. Jerome says, "_Haud dubium quin urbis partem -significet quæ interiori muro vallabatur_." Comp. Zeph. i. 10, "an -howling from the _second_" (_i.e._, quarter of the city); Neh. xi. 9, -where, for "_second over the city_" (A. and R.V.), read "over the -second part of the city." - -[697] Another reading is "in Jerusalem," which gets over an historic -difficulty. - -[698] Comp. 2 Kings xi. 14; LXX., ἐπὶ τοῦ στύλου; Heb., _al-ha-ammud_; -Vulg., _super gradum_. - -[699] 2 Kings xxiii. 4; for "in the fields of Kedron" one version has -ἐν τῷ ἐμπυρισμῷ τοῦ χειμάῤῥου, "in the burning-place of the -wady,"--perhaps reading _bemisrephoth_ for _bishedamoth_, and alluding -to lime-kilns in the wady. It is surprising that they should carry the -ashes "to Bethel." Thenius suggests the reading בֵּית־אַל, "place of -execution" (lit., "house of nothingness"). - -[700] Hos. x. 5; Zeph. i. 4 (the only other places where the word -occurs). The _delevit_ of the Vulgate (2 Kings xxiii. 5) only means that -he put them down, and the κατέκαυσε of the LXX. should be κατέπαυσε. - -[701] Comp. Jer. ii. 23, where the LXX. has ἐν τῷ πολυανδρίῳ. In 2 -Chron. xxxiv. 4, perhaps the true reading is, not _Benî-ha-'âm_, but -_Benî-hinnom_--which would mean that he scattered the dust in the -gehenna of Jerusalem. Comp. 1 Kings xv. 13. - -[702] For these Galli, see Seneca, _De Vit. Beat._, 27; Pliny, _H. -N._, xi. 49. - -[703] Heb., _bathîm_, lit. "tents" or "houses"; Vulg., _quasi -domunculas_. - -[704] In 2 Kings xxiii. 8, Geiger would read "the high places of the -_satyrs_" (שׂצירים). - -[705] Usually derived (as by Selden and Milton) from _toph_, "drum," -but perhaps from _tuph_ (to _spit_ in sign of abhorrence). - -[706] _Parvar_--perhaps "open portico." Renan connects the word with -the Greek περίβολος. On horses dedicated to the sun, see Xen. -_Cyrop._, viii. 3, 5, 12; _Anab._, iv. 5. - -[707] See Zeph. i. 5; Jer. xix. 13, xxxii. 29. - -[708] 2 Kings xxiii. 13: "The Mount of Corruption"; Vulg., _Mons -offensionis_; LXX., τοῦ ὄρους τοῦ Μοσθάθ. Some conjecture that -_Maschith_ may be a derisive change for some word which meant -"anointing" (from being the _Oil_ Mountain, _Har ham-mischchah_). - -[709] In burning the bones of the dead, he violated all Jewish feeling. -Amos (ii. 1) had severely rebuked this form of revenge and insult even -in the case of the heathen King of Moab. Bones defiled the touch (Num. -xix. 16; Herod., iv. 73). Josiah's question at Bethel was, "What -_pillar_ is that?" (_tsiyun_). LXX., σκόπελον. Comp. Gen. xxxv. 20. - -[710] 1 Kings xiii. 29-31. - -[711] 2 Chron. xxxv. 1-19. - -[712] Jer. xi. 3, 4. Since, in this part of my subject, I make -frequent reference to the prophecies of Jeremiah which are -indispensable to the right understanding of the history, I may here -say that modern critics (Cheyne and others) arrange them as follows:-- - -In the reign of _Josiah_, Jer. ii. 1-iii. 5, iii. 6-vi. 30, vii. 1-ix. -25, xi. 1-17. - -In the reign of _Jehoiakim_, xxvi. 2-6, xlvi. 2-12, xxv., xxxv., and -possibly xvi. 1, xviii. 19-27, xiv., xv., xviii., xi. 18-xii. 17. - -In the reign of _Jehoiachin_, x. 17-23, xiii. - -In the reign of _Zedekiah_, xxii.-xxiv., xxvii.-xxix. 1-11 (?), lii. - -In the _Exile_, xxxix.-xliv. - -[713] See Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, p. 56, _id._ 6. - -[714] Canon Cheyne shows that even Mohammed could not persuade the -Qurashites wholly to give up their black stone at the Kaaba, and their -dolmens and sacred trees (_id._ 103). He left the _auçab_, or -sacrificial stones (_matstseboth_), though he warns his followers -against them (_Quran_, v. 92). - -[715] Jer. xvii. 9-11. - -[716] Ewald, _The Prophets_, iii. 63, 64. - -[717] Jer. xvii. 1-4. - -[718] The Qurashites and other heathen Arabs accounted holy a large -green tree, and every year had a sacrifice in its honour. "On the way to -Hunain we called to God's Messenger (Mohammed) that he should appoint -for us such trees. But he was terrified, and said, 'Lord God, Lord God! -Ye speak even as the Israelites ... ye are still in ignorance,--thus are -heathen enslaved'" (Vakïdi, _Book of the Campaigns of God's Messenger_, -quoted by Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, p. 103, from Wellhausen). - -[719] Psalm lxxxv. 8. - -[720] Deut. xxx. 11-14. See Wellhausen, p. 165. - -[721] Jer. vi. 20. The passages of Jeremiah which seem of a different -spirit may have been added by later hands--_e.g._, xxxiii. 18, which -is not in the LXX. - -[722] Jer. vii. 21; Ewald; and Cheyne, _l.c._ 120. So the Jews seem to -have understood it, for they appoint this passage to be read on the -_Haphtara_ after the _Parashah_ about sacrifices from Leviticus. - -[723] Jer, vii. 22, 23. This alone would show that Jeremiah did not -(as earlier critics thought) _write_ "Deuteronomy," in spite of the -numerous close resemblances in phraseology. Thus, Jeremiah often -denounces the priests (i. 18, ii. 8-26, iv. 9, v. 31, viii. 1, xiii. -13, xxxii. 32). Cheyne, p. 82. - -[724] Mic. iii. 11. - -[725] Jer. vii. 4, 8-15. - -[726] Jer. xxxi. 31, 32. - -[727] Jer. xxii. 15, 16. - - - - - NOTE TO CHAPTER XXXI. - - "Jehovah is our Lawgiver."--ISA. xxxiii. 22. - - -What was the Book of the Law which Hilkiah found in the Temple? - -The great majority of eminent modern critics have now come to the -conclusion that it was the kernel of the Book of Deuteronomy. Nor is -this in any sense a mere modern notion. It occurs as far back as St. -Jerome (_Adv. Jovin._, i. 5) and St. Chrysostom (_Hom. in Matt._, ix., -p. 135, B. See W. Rob. Smith, p. 258). - -It is no part of my immediate duty to argue this question, but I may -state that the arguments for this conclusion are partly historical, -partly literary, and partly depend on internal evidence. - -I. As regards the _literary_ argument, it is maintained that-- - -1. The full, rounded, rhetorical style of Deuteronomy, so widely -different from the extreme dryness of other parts of the Torah, could -not have been as yet developed in the days of Moses, and required the -slow training of centuries for its perfection. It is a new phenomenon, -and differs widely from earlier prophetic writings, such as those of -Amos and Hosea. - -2. The style and language of the Deuteronomist are so marked, that -they can scarcely escape an intelligent reader of the English Version. -Riehm enumerates sixty-four characteristic words or phrases. Their -significance lies in the fact that they express obvious ideas, and are -not names for special objects, which force a writer to use peculiar -words. The style closely resembles in many phrases and particulars the -style of Jeremiah, and of him alone among the prophets. "Even -supposing that no historic text," it has been said, "taught us that -the articles of Smalkald were the work of Luther, we should still have -the right to affirm that these articles closely resemble the ideas of -Luther, and could hardly have been published without his cognisance." - -II. As regards _historical_ evidence, we observe that-- - -1. No author earlier than Josiah shows any acquaintance with -Deuteronomy: after that date, proofs of such knowledge abound. - -2. The Book of Deuteronomy insisted with reiterated emphasis on the -centralisation of worship. All its ordinances are framed with a view -to promote this end. But we have seen that there is not a trace of any -belief that local shrines were prohibited earlier than the reign of -Hezekiah, who certainly would have defended his boldness by appeal to -a written law if he had known of such as existing. - -III. As regards _internal_ evidence, we see that-- - -1. Many passages and injunctions of the Book of Deuteronomy differ -entirely from those found in the old Book of the Covenant which forms -the most ancient nucleus of Exodus (Exod. xx. 22-xxiii. 33). - -2. Even the most conservative English critics--even those who, with any -pretence to competent knowledge, argue against the more advanced -conclusions of the Higher Criticism--cannot help admitting that at least -three codes, which in many, and in some fundamental, respects differ -widely from each other, and which make no reference to each other, are -found in our present Pentateuch--viz., that of the Book of the Covenant, -that of the Deuteronomist (D.), and that of the Priestly writer (P.). -All three may contain elements as old as the days of Moses; but most -critics (with scarcely an exception in Germany) now believe that the -Deuteronomic Code, in its present form, is not earlier than the date of -Josiah's reformation (_circ._ B.C. 621); and the Priestly Codex -(whatever older documents may exist in it) not older, in its present -form, than about the time of Ezra (B.C. 444). Dillmann, Kittel, and in -his later days Delitzsch, have been of necessity compelled to give up -the views that, in their present form, D. and P. are as ancient as the -days of Moses. The last German critic who held that Moses wrote our -present Pentateuch was Keil (_d._ 1888). Canon Cheyne argues for the -late date of this misnamed "Deuteronomy," on the grounds that the -authors (1) used documents manifestly later than Moses; (2) alluded to -events which only occurred long after Moses; and (3) expressed ideas -which, in the age of Moses, are not psychologically possible. - -The Book of Deuteronomy consists mainly of an historical introduction, -probably added later (i. 1-5); Moses' _first_ discourse (i. 6-iv. 40); -Moses' _second_ discourse (iv. 44-xxvi.); a section marked specially -by blessings and curses (xxvii.-xxix.); a _third_ discourse of Moses -(xxix. 2-xxx. 20); his farewell (xxxi. 1-13); his song (xxxi. -14-xxxii. 47); conclusion, narrating his blessing and death (xxxii. -48-xxxiv. 12). - -I have no space here to enter fully into the arguments which seem -decisive as to the date of the main part of Deuteronomy. Those who -desire to see them must study Colenso, _The Pentateuch_, pt. iii.; -Reuss, _Hist. Sainte et la Loi_, i. 154-211; W. Robertson Smith, _Old -Test. in the Jewish Church_, lect. xvi.; Kuenen, _The Hexateuch_, E. -T., 1886; Kittel, _Gesch. d. Hebräer_, pp. 43-59; Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, -pp. 48-86; S. R. Driver, _s.v._ "Deuteronomy" (Smith's _Dict. of the -Bible_, new ed.); W. Aldis Wright, _The Documents of the Hexateuch_, -pp. lvii.-lxxix. The name "Deuteronomy" (or "second law") arises from -the mistaken rendering of the LXX. and Vulgate in Deut. xvii. 18. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXII - - _THE DEATH OF JOSIAH_ - - B.C. 608 - - 2 KINGS xxiii. 29, 30 - - "Howl, O fir tree; for the cedar is fallen."--ZECH. xi. 2. - - -Josiah survived by thirteen years the reformation and covenant which -are the chief events of his reign. He lived in prosperity and peace. -He did justice and judgment; the poor and needy flourished under his -royal protection; and it was well with him. It seemed as if the -Deuteronomic blessings on faithfulness to its law were about to be -abundantly fulfilled, when "the azure calm of heaven" was suddenly -shattered, and "down came the thunderbolt." The great and victorious -Assurbanipal of Assyria had died, and left his power to weaker -successors. Meanwhile, Egypt was growing in power and splendour under -Pharaoh Necho II. (B.C. 612-596), the sixth king of the twenty-fifth -or Saitic dynasty. He nearly anticipated M. de Lesseps in making the -Suez Canal,[728] and perhaps actually anticipated Vasco de Gama in -rounding the Cabo Tormentoso, or Cape of Good Hope, in a three years' -voyage. He was fired by the ambitious dream of succeeding the -Assyrians as the chief power in the world, or at any rate of seizing -part of the dominions which they had conquered.[729] Accordingly, in -B.C. 608, he went up against the King of Assyria to the river -Euphrates. The Chronicler says that his destination was Carchemish, on -the Euphrates, and some have conjectured that the vague phrase -"against the King of Assyria" is incorrect, and that, as Josephus -states, he was really marching against the Medes and Babylonians after -the fall of Nineveh.[730] - -With this expedition Josiah was not greatly concerned. He may have -begun his reign as the vassal of Assurbanipal; but if so, it is -probable that he had long since ceased to pay tribute to a power which -was tottering to its fall under the attacks of Scythians and -Babylonians. He had availed himself of the disorganisation of the -Assyrian power to re-establish some, at least, of the old authority of -the House of David over the Northern Kingdom, and perhaps he only -undertook the desperate expedient of withstanding the northward march -of the Egyptian host under the notion that either on the march or on -his return the Pharaoh intended to subjugate Palestine to Egypt. - -Pharaoh Necho II., among his other achievements, had created a -powerful fleet,[731] and it is nearly certain that he did not advance -along the coast of Palestine, but made his way by sea to Acco or -Dor.[732] Here he received the news that Josiah meant to block his -path at Megiddo, on the plain of Jezreel. That plain has been the -great and only possible battle-field of Palestine, from the revolt in -which Barak destroyed the host of Jabin,[733] to that in which Tryphon -met Jonathan the Maccabee,[734] and Kleber in 1799 defeated -twenty-five thousand Turks with three thousand French. - -The Chronicler here adds a very remarkable incident.[735] Necho, like -Joash of Israel in former days, did not care to fight with the poor -little King of Judah--or at any rate did not wish to do so at present, -when he was on his way to the greater encounter. He therefore sent an -embassy to Josiah, saying, "What have I to do with thee, King of -Judah? I come not against thee this day, but against the house -wherewith I have war.[736] For God [Elohim] commanded me [in a dream] -to make haste.[737] Forbear, then, from meddling with God, who is with -me, that He destroy thee not." - -The conjecture "in a dream" is not unlikely, nor is it in disaccord -with other events in the annals of the Pharaohs and the Sargonidæ of -Assyria.[738] We may indeed be surprised that an Egyptian Pharaoh -should profess to deliver to a Jewish king the messages of Elohim, -though we have seen something like this in the case of the -Rabshakeh.[739] The variation in 1 Esdras i. 26-28 is curious and -interesting. We are there told that the message was sent to Josiah, -not only by Pharaoh Necho, who had sent to say "The Lord is with me -hastening me forward: depart from me, and be not against the Lord," -but also by "the prophet Jeremy." Josephus frankly ascribes the error -of Josiah to destiny, as though he had been infatuated by the -dementation which the Greeks attributed to Atè.[740] - -This, however, is not likely; for it is clear that Jeremiah, though -not mentioned in the Book of Kings, must have had a strong influence -over the mind of Josiah, whom he loved, whose views he shared, in -whose religious revolution he had taken part. Further, we do not read -of any warning recorded by the prophet himself; and had he uttered -one, it would certainly have been mentioned, when he committed his -prophecies to writing twenty-three years after their commencement. A -warning of which the neglect had led to fatal issues would have been -so decisive a confirmation of Jeremiah's prophetic insight that it -could not have been passed over in silence. - -Indeed, Jeremiah may have shared the conviction which, founded on -imperfect generalisation, perhaps dazzled the unfortunate king to his -ruin. Josiah had accepted the Book of Deuteronomy with the whole -strength of his belief, and the Book of Deuteronomy had proclaimed to -Israel as the reward of faithfulness this promise: "And it shall come -to pass that Jehovah, thy God, shall set thee on high above all the -nations of the earth.... Jehovah shall cause thine enemies which rise -up against thee to be smitten before thy face: they shall come out -against thee one way, and flee before thee seven ways."[741] In the -strength of that promise, Josiah was perhaps saying to himself, in the -language of the Psalms, that Jehovah could not fail to save His -anointed, and dash His enemies to pieces under His feet;[742] in the -language, perhaps, of later days, that the sound of a shaken leaf -should chase them, and they should flee when none pursued.[743] - -Alas! such passages do not apply invariably to our worldly fortunes! -God's promises are general. The individual must be considered apart -from the universal in the region of spiritual and eternal blessings. -In the affairs of earth the wicked often seem to be in prosperity, -while the righteous are overwhelmed by all God's waves and storms. -Further, Josiah evidently received a warning--a warning which -professed to come, and really came, from God[744]--whether uttered by -Pharaoh or by Jeremiah. And in this instance Josiah had sought war; he -had not been forced into it. It was not for him to go out of his way -to champion the cause either of cruel Assyria or vaunting Babylon. - -The result was entire disenchantment. No more disheartening and -disastrous calamity could have happened to the kingdom, which had just -begun to struggle out of the slough of idolatry and humiliation. - -Heedless of the message he had received, strong in mistaken hopes, -Josiah opposed his poor, weak forces to the powerful host of renovated -Egypt. The result was instantaneous ruin.[745] Judah was defeated and -scattered without a blow,--Necho came, saw, conquered. Josiah, -according to the present record of the Chronicles, like Ahab, -"disguised himself"[746] and went into the battle; and as he drove -from rank to rank an Egyptian archer drew a bow at a venture, and -smote him while he was putting his forces in array. The arrow-point -brought conviction too late. Josiah saw his error; he knew that his -own death involved the rout of his army. He sounded a retreat, and -said to his servants, "Bear me away to my travelling chariot, for I am -sore wounded."[747] He died at Megiddo, where his ancestor Ahaziah had -died before him from the arrow-wounds of Jehu's pursuers. His servants -carried him in a chariot dead from Megiddo. The famous plain of -Esdraelon had already witnessed two great victories--that of Barak -over Sisera, and that of Gideon over the Midianites; and one -deplorable defeat--that of Saul by the Philistines. It was now -darkened by a catastrophe even more sad.[748] - -When that chariot, accompanied by its wailing escort, entered the -gates of Jerusalem, with the routed army of Judah behind it, the -feeling of the people must have resembled that of the Athenians when -the news reached them that Lysander had destroyed their whole fleet at -Ægospotami, and the long wail went thrilling up through that sleepless -night from the Peiræus all along the Makra Teichè to the Parthenon and -the Acropolis. And there followed such a mourning as the land had -never known before. It had begun at Megiddo and Hadadrimmon, leaving -the sad memory of its hopeless intensity. It was renewed at Jerusalem -when they buried the king in his own sepulchre. "The land mourned, -every family apart; the family of the House of David apart, and their -wives apart; the family of the House of Nathan apart, and their wives -apart; the family of the House of Levi apart, and their wives apart; -the family of Shimei apart, and their wives apart; all the families -that remained, every family apart, and their wives apart."[749] "And -all Judah and Jerusalem mourned for Josiah. And Jeremiah lamented for -Josiah: and all the singing men and the singing women spake of Josiah -in their lamentations unto this day, and they were made an institution -in Israel: and, behold, they are written in the Lamentations."[750] -Not even for heroic David, or royal Solomon, or pious Asa, or -prosperous Jehoshaphat had there been so loud a dirge. - -But, alas! there was cause for far deeper sorrow than the loss of a -prince, however able, however beloved. The dead was dead. Natural sorrow -for the bereavement of the people would soon be healed by time, but -behind the passing affliction lay a great fear and a great reaction. - -A great fear,--for now a southern foe was added to the northern. -Jeremiah and other prophets had warned Israel of the peril from the -North. When the Scythian wave "rolled shoreward, struck and was -dissipated," when the source of Assyrian terror seemed to be drying up, -worldlings may have felt inclined to laugh at Jeremiah. But now it was -evident that, sooner or later, the Chaldæans would be as formidable as -their predecessors, and out of the serpent's egg was breaking forth a -cockatrice. The uncalled-for attempt of Josiah to bar the path of the -new and mighty Pharaoh had also added Egypt to the list of formidable -enemies. For the present the Pharaoh had passed on to the Euphrates; but -whether he returned victorious or defeated, his troops could not but be -a source of danger to the little kingdom, which would henceforth be -helpless between the overwhelming forces of its foes. - -If such were the fears of the timid and the pessimistic, still deeper -was the disheartenment of the faithful. Josiah had been the most -obedient, the most religious, of all the kings of Judah from childhood -upwards. Where, then, were Jehovah's old loving-kindnesses which He -sware unto David in His truth? Had God forgotten to be gracious? Had -He hidden away His mercy in displeasure? Where were the blessings of -the newly discovered Book of the Law, if the curse fell on its most -earnest votary? Where was Huldah's promise that he should be gathered -to his fathers in peace, if he was carried back dead from the field of -fruitless battle? There can be little doubt that the apparent blight -which had fallen on unavailing righteousness hastened the reaction of -the subsequent reigns. Many might be inclined to cry out with even -Jeremiah in his moments of overwhelming despondency, "Ah, Lord God! -surely Thou hast greatly deceived this people and Jerusalem, saying, -'Ye shall have peace'; whereas the sword reacheth unto the soul."[751] -"O Lord, Thou has deceived me, and I was deceived: Thou art stronger -than I, and hast prevailed: I am a derision daily, every one mocketh -me. Whenever I speak, I must shout, I must cry violence and spoil; for -the word of the Lord is made a reproach unto me, and a derision, -daily."[752] - -But man judges partially and judges amiss. God's ways are not as man's -ways. God sees the whole; He sees the future; He sees things as they -are. Through defeat, through captivity, through multiform affliction, -lay the path to the final deliverance of the nation from the grosser -forms of idolatry. When they wept as they remembered Zion, when they -took down their harps from the willows by the water-courses of Babylon -to sing the Lord's song in a strange land, they turned again--and at -last with their whole heart--to God their Saviour, who had done so -great things for them;--until the grey secret lingering in the East -was brightened by the Morning Star, and there was revealed to the -world a True Israel, and a New Jerusalem, wherein the Lord should be -King for evermore. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[728] He was forced to desist by a fearful mortality among the -labourers. - -[729] _Circ._ B.C. 611-605. Herod., ii. 158, 159, iv. 42. Psamatik, -the father of Necho, was perhaps a Lybian. He established his sway -over all Egypt displacing the Assyrians. - -[730] _Antt._, X. v. 1. - -[731] Herod., ii. 158. His father Psamatik had left him an adequate -army of natives and mercenaries. - -[732] Herodotus says of his ships: Ἁι μὲν ἐπὶ τῇ βορηίῃ θαλάσσῃ -ἐποιήθησαν. - -[733] Judg. iv. 23; 1 Sam. xxix. 1-11; 1 Kings xx. 26; 2 Kings xxiii. -29; 2 Chron. xxxv. 22; Rev. xvi. 16 (Armageddon). Herodotus confuses -it with Migdol (Μάγδολον). - -[734] 1 Macc. xii. 49; Jos., _Antt._, XIII. vi. 2. - -[735] 2 Chron. xxxv. 20-22. - -[736] According to 1 Esdras i. 25-32, "for upon Euphrates is my war." - -[737] Klostermann, in 2 Chron. xxxv. 21, reads _bachalôm_, "in a -dream," instead of "to make haste." - -[738] Gen. xli. 1; Herod., ii. 188; _Records of the Past_, ix. 52. - -[739] 2 Kings xviii. 25. - -[740] _Antt._, X. v. 1: Τῆς πεπρωμένης οἶμαι εἰς τοῦτ' αὐτόν -παρορμησάσης. - -[741] Deut. xxviii. 1-8. - -[742] Psalm xx. 6, xviii. 29-50. - -[743] Lev. xxvi. 36. - -[744] 2 Chron. xxxv. 22: "hearkened not _to the words of Necho from -the mouth of God_." - -[745] "When he had _seen_ him." Comp. 2 Kings xiv. 8. - -[746] 1 Esdras i. 25; and LXX., "firmly resolved," "strengthened -himself," as in 2 Chron. xxv. 11. - -[747] Jos., _Antt._, X. v. 1; and 2 Chron. xxxv. 23; 1 Esdras i. 30. - -[748] The fortunes of the Jews again prevailed in this plain in the -days of Holofernes (Judith vii. 3); but they were defeated there by -Placidus (Jos., _B. J._, IV. i. 8). - -[749] Zech. xii. 11-13 (comp. Jer. xxii. 10, 18). No such place as -Hadadrimmon is known, though there is a Rummâne not far from Megiddo. -Jerome (_Comm. in Zach._) identifies it with a place which he calls -Maximianopolis. Wellhausen (_Skizzen_, 192) thinks that the mourning -is compared to some wail over the god Hadadrimmon, like the wailing -for Tammuz. Jonathan and Jarchi say that Hadadrimmon was the son of -Tabrimmon, who opposed Ahab at Ramoth-Gilead. - -[750] 2 Chron. xxxv. 24, 25. Jeremiah's elegy has probably perished. -It would have been most interesting had it been preserved. Lam. iv. is -too vague to have been this lost poem. - -[751] Jer. iv. 10. - -[752] Jer. xx. 7, 8. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXIII - - _JEHOAHAZ_ - - B.C. 608 - - 2 KINGS xxiii. 31-33 - - "I went by, and, lo! he was gone: I sought him, but his place - could nowhere be found."--PSALM xxxvii. 36. - -It was under the disastrous circumstances which attended his father's -death at Megiddo that Jehoahaz began to reign. There is some confusion -about the four sons of Josiah, whom the Chronicler calls Johanan, -Jehoiakim, Zedekiah, and Shallum.[753] From Jer. xxii. 11, it appears -that Jehoahaz was the royal name taken on his anointing by Shallum, the -third son.[754] If so, he cannot be identified with Johanan, the -firstborn, as in the margin of our version. Further, it appears from our -historians that Jehoahaz was twenty-three at his succession, and was -therefore younger than Jehoiakim who (three months later) succeeded him -at the age of twenty-five. Jehoahaz was the own brother of Zedekiah, -Jehoiakim being his half-brother by another mother (Zebudah). - -We do not know for what reason he was preferred by "the people of the -land" to his elder brother Eliakim or Jehoiakim. It was probably -because they regarded him as a prince of eminent courage and ability. -The high hopes which the nation conceived of him may be seen in the -pathetic elegy of Ezek. xix.:-- - - "Moreover take thou up a lamentation for the princes of Israel, and - say,-- - What was thy mother? A lioness! - Amidst lions she couched, - In the midst of the young lions she nourished her whelps. - She brought up one of her whelps: he became a young lion; - He learned to catch the prey; he devoured men. - The nations heard of him; - In their pit was he taken,[755] - And they brought him with hooks into the land of Egypt."[756] - -We see, too, that he was to an eminent degree the darling of the -nation in the still more plaintive wail of Jeremiah which will be -quoted later. - -The fact that Shallum solemnly changed his name to Jehoahaz ("Jehovah -taketh hold"),[757] and that the people of the land not only "made him -king in his father's stead," but also "anointed him," points to a -disputed succession.[758] High hopes were conceived of him; but he -hardly had a chance of fulfilling them, for he was only permitted to -reign three months. What were the events of those months we do not -know. Jehoahaz must have disappointed any hopes which may have been -formed of him by the religious party; for dear as he was to them, the -historians record of him that "he did that which was evil in the sight -of the Lord, according to all that his fathers had done," although -they specify no particular offence. The same sad verdict is passed on -all his four successors; but Josephus says even more emphatically of -Jehoahaz that he was impious and impure.[759] - -He must have shown some activity in other respects, or else Ezekiel -would hardly have said that "the nations heard of him," and that "he -learned to catch the prey; he devoured men." Over all his deeds, -whatever they may have been, "the iniquity of oblivion has blindly -scattered her poppy," and he fell a victim to the great -world-movements of those troublous times. - -For Pharaoh, after his defeat of Josiah at Megiddo, proceeded to make -himself master of Syria and Palestine. He took Cadytis, which -Herodotus calls "a large city of Syria,"[760] and which--since it -cannot here mean Gaza, as in Herod., iii. 5--has been identified by -some with Kadesh. Thence he marched to Carchemish, on the right bank -of the Euphrates,[761] none venturing to check him, till "once more, -after the lapse of nine centuries, Egyptian garrisons looked down on -that historic stream."[762] On his return he stopped at Riblah, on the -Orontes,[763] to consolidate his Syrian conquests; and there he learnt -that, without consulting him, the people of Jerusalem had made -Jehoahaz their king. Perhaps he heard enough of the warlike prowess of -Jehoahaz to make him resent this act of independence. After his three -months' campaign he sent for Jehoahaz to Riblah, and the unhappy -prince had no choice but to obey. Possibly the Egyptian party in -Jerusalem, headed by his disappointed elder brother Eliakim, may have -intrigued against him with Pharaoh Necho. When he reached Riblah, he -was unceremoniously deposed; and though we may hope that the -expression of Ezekiel, that "they brought him with _hooks_ into the -land of Egypt," belongs to the metaphor of the captured lion's whelp, -it is certain that he was taken to the banks of the Nile as a fettered -captive, never to return. How long his miserable life was protracted, -or how he was treated in Egypt, we do not know. The sun of the young -prince went down in darkness while it was yet day. No king of Judah -before him had died in prison and in exile, and the calamity smote -heavily the heart of his people. Egypt was not to escape--shortly -thereafter--the doom of violence and pride; but whether the young -Jewish king had died meanwhile of a broken heart, or whether he -dragged on to hoar hairs his maimed life, or whether he was murdered -in his dungeon, no man knew. One thing only was clear to the sad -prophet--that he would never return. - -"Weep ye not for the dead, neither bemoan him: but weep ye sore for -him that is gone away: for he shall return no more, nor see his native -country. For thus saith Jehovah concerning Shallum, the son of Josiah, -King of Judah, which reigned instead of Josiah his father, which went -forth out of this place: 'He shall not return thither any more: but in -the place whither they have led him captive there shall he die, and he -shall see this land no more.'"[764] - -To show his absolute power over Judah and Jerusalem, Pharaoh Necho not -only deposed and fettered their king, but put the whole land under a -yearly tribute of one hundred talents of silver (about £40,000) and a -talent of gold (about £4,000).[765] - -Even this comparatively small sum was a heavy burden for so greatly -afflicted and impoverished a country, and Pharaoh further imposed on -them a vassal to see that it was duly extorted. This was Eliakim, the -eldest living son of Josiah. There was nothing left to plunder in the -Temple or the palace, and therefore the exaction had to be borne by -the taxed and suffering people. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[753] Chron. iii. 15. - -[754] He is named "fourth," but he was older than his brothers -Jehoiakim and Zedekiah (2 Kings xxiii. 31, xxiv. 18). The genealogy is -as follows:-- - - Zebudah = JOSIAH = Hamutal. - | | - ----- |------------------- - | | | - Nehushta = ELIAKIM ZEDEKIAH JEHOAHAZ - | or Jehoiakim. or Mattaniah. or Shallum. - | - JEHOIACHIN. - - -[755] An allusion to the Syrian mode of hunting the lion by driving it -with cries into a concealed pit (Tristram, _Nat. Hist. of the Bible_, -118; Cheyne, 140). - -[756] Ezek. xix. 1-4. - -[757] The name Shallum means "recompense." It may have been regarded -as ill-omened, since the King of Israel who bore this rare name had -only reigned a month. - -[758] The Talmud says that kings were only anointed in special cases -(_Keritoth_, f. 5, 2; Grätz, ii. 328). - -[759] Jos., _Antt._, X. v. 2: Ἀσεβὴς καὶ μιαρὸς τὸν τρόπον. - -[760] Herod., ii. 159. - -[761] Mr. G. Smith identifies Carchemish with Jerablûs. - -[762] Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, p. 127. - -[763] Comp. 2 Kings xxv. 20, 21. The old Hittite capital of Riblah was -a convenient halting-place on the road between Babylon and Jerusalem. -It was on the northernmost boundary of Palestine towards Damascus -(Amos vi. 14). - -[764] Jer. xxii. 10-12. - -[765] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 3; 1 Esdras i. 36. The smallness of the tribute -proves the impoverishment of the land. Sennacherib demanded from -Hezekiah three hundred talents of silver, and thirty of gold; and -Menahem paid one thousand talents of silver to Tiglath-Pileser. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXIV - - _JEHOIAKIM_ - - B.C. 608-597 - - 2 KINGS xxiii. 36-xxiv. 7 - - "But those things that are recorded of him, and of his uncleanness - and impiety, are written in the Chronicles of the Kings."--1 - ESDRAS i. 42. - - "When Jehoiakim succeeded to the throne, he said, 'My predecessors - knew not how to provoke God.'"--_Sanhedrin_, f. 103, 2. - - "There is no strange handwriting on the wall, - Through all the midnight hum no threatening call, - Nor on the marble floor the stealthy fall - Of fatal footsteps. All is safe.--Thou fool, - The avenging deities are shod with wool!" - W. ALLEN BUTLER. - - -Eliakim succeeded to the throne at the age of twenty-five under very -unenviable circumstances--as a nominal king, a helpless nominee and -tributary of the Pharaoh. He seems to have been thoroughly distasteful -to the people; and if we may judge from the fact that Ezekiel frankly -ignores him and passes from Jehoahaz to Jehoachin, he was regarded as -a tax-gathering usurper nominated by an alien tyrant. For after -speaking of Jehoahaz, Ezekiel says,-- - - "Now when she [Judah] saw that she had waited [for the restoration of - Jehoahaz], and her hope was lost, - Then she took another of her whelps;[766] - A young lion she made him. - He went up and down among the lions; - He became a young lion."[767] - -The historian says that Necho turned the name of Eliakim ("God will -establish") to Jehoiakim ("Jehovah will establish"); but by this can -hardly be meant more than that he sanctioned the change of El into -Jehovah on Eliakim's installation upon the throne. - -Jehoiakim is condemned in the same terms as all the other sons of -Josiah. His misdoings are far more definitely recorded in the -Prophets, who furnish us with details which are passed over by the -historians. Some of his sins may have been due to the influence of his -wife Nehushta, who was a daughter of Elnathan of Achbor, one of the -princes of the heathen party. It was this Elnathan whom the king chose -as a fitting ambassador to demand the extradition of the prophet -Urijah from Egypt. One of the crimes with which Jehoiakim is charged -is the building for himself of a sumptuous palace, and thus vainly -trying to emulate the splendours of Assyrian, Babylonian, and Egyptian -kings. In itself the act would not have been more wicked than it was -in Solomon, whose architectural parade is dwelt upon with enthusiasm. -But the circumstances were now wholly different. Solomon was at that -time in all his glory, the possessor of boundless wealth, the ruler of -an immense and united territory, the head of a powerful and prosperous -people, the successor of an unconquered hero who had gone to his grave -in peace; Jehoiakim, on the other hand, had succeeded a father who had -died in defeat on the field of battle, and a brother who was -hopelessly pining in an Egyptian prison. The Tribes had been carried -into captivity by Assyria; the nation was beaten, oppressed, and poor; -the king himself possessed but a shadow of royalty. In such a -condition of things it would have been his glory to maintain a -watchful and strenuous activity, and to devote himself in simplicity -and self-denial to the good of his people. It showed a perverted and -sensuous mind to insult the misery of his subjects at such a time by -feeble attempts to rival heathen potentates in costly æstheticism. But -this was not all; he carried out his ignoble selfishness at the cost -of oppression and wrong.[768] - -It is possible that the prophet Habakkuk alludes to him in the words:-- - -"Woe to him that getteth an evil gain for his house, that he may set -his nest on high, that he may be delivered from the hand of evil![769] -Thou hast consulted shame to thy house by cutting off many peoples, -and hast sinned against thy soul. For the stone shall cry out of the -wall, and the beam out of the timber shall answer it."[770] - -The thought of the Jewish king's selfish expensiveness may have crossed -the mind of Habakkuk, though the taunt is addressed directly to the -Chaldæans, and especially to Nebuchadrezzar, who was at that time -revelling in the beautifying of Babylon, and especially of his own royal -palace. On the other hand, the rebuke, or rather the denunciation, -uttered by Jeremiah against the king for this line of conduct, and for -the forced labour which it required, is terribly direct. - - "'Woe unto him that buildeth his house by unrighteousness, - And his chambers by wrong; - That useth his neighbour's service without wages, - And giveth him not his hire; - That saith, "I will build me a wide house and spacious chambers," - And cutteth out windows; - And it is ceiled with cedar, and painted with vermilion. - Shalt thou reign because thou viest with the cedar?[771] - Did not thy father eat and drink, and do judgment and justice? - Then it was well with him! - Was not this to know Me?' saith the Lord. - 'But thine heart is not but for thy dishonest gain, - And for to shed innocent blood, - And for oppression and for violence to do it.'"[772] - -Then follows the stern message of doom which we shall quote hereafter. -The king's bad example stimulated or perhaps emulated similar folly -and want of patriotism on the part of his nobles. They were shepherds -who destroyed and scattered the sheep of Jehovah's pastures. But vain -was their imagined security, and their ostentation. The judgment was -imminent.[773] - -"O inhabitress of Lebanon, that makest thy nest in the cedars," -exclaims the prophet in bitter mockery, "how greatly wilt thou groan -when pangs come upon thee, the pain as of a woman in travail!"[774] - -But Jehoiakim's offences were deadlier than this. The Chronicler -speaks of "the abominations which he did"; and some have therefore -supposed that the evil state of things described by Jeremiah (xix.) -refers to this reign. If so, he plunged into the idolatry which caused -Judah to be shivered like a potter's vessel. Certainly he sinned -grievously against God in the person of His prophets. - -Jeremiah was not the only prophet who disdained the easy and -traitorous popularity which was to be won by prophesying "peace, -peace," when there was no peace. He had for his contemporary another -messenger of God, no less boldly explicit than himself--Urijah, the -son of Shemaiah of Kirjath-Jearim. Jeremiah had as yet only prophesied -in his humble native village of Anathoth; he had not been called upon -to face "the swellings" or "the pride of Jordan."[775] Urijah had been -in the fuller glare of publicity in the capital, and his bold -declaration that Jerusalem should fall before Nebuchadrezzar and the -Chaldæans had excited such a fury of indignation that he escaped into -Egypt for his life. Surely this should have appeased the rulers, even -if they chose to pay no attention to the Divine menace. For the -prophets were recognised deliverers of the messages of Jehovah; and -with scarcely an exception, even in the most wicked reigns, their -persons had been regarded as sacrosanct. But Jehoiakim would not let -Urijah escape. He sent an embassy to Necho, headed by his -father-in-law Elnathan, son of Achbor, requesting his extradition. -Urijah had been dragged back from Egypt, and, to the horror of the -people, the king had slain him with the sword, and flung his body into -the graves of the common people.[776] What made this conduct more -monstrous was the precedent of Micah the Morasthite. He, in the days -of Hezekiah, had prophesied,-- - - "Zion shall be ploughed as a field, - And Jerusalem shall become heaps, - And the Mountain of the House as the wooded heights."[777] - -Yet so far from putting him to death, or even stirring a finger -against him, the pious king had only been moved to repentance by the -Divine threatenings. Thus the blood of the first martyr-prophet, if we -except the case of Zechariah, had been shed by the son of Judah's most -pious king. Jeremiah himself only narrowly escaped martyrdom. The -precedent of Micah helped to save him, though it had not saved Urijah. -He was far more powerfully protected by the patronage of the princes -and the people. Standing in the Temple court, he had declared that, -unless the nation repented, that house should be like Shiloh, and the -city a curse to all the nations of the earth. Maddened by such words -of bold rebuke, the priests and the prophets and the people had -threatened him with death. But the princes took his part, and some of -the people came over to them. His most powerful protector was Ahikam, -the son of Shaphan, a member of a family of the utmost distinction. - -Meanwhile, we must follow for a time the outward fortunes of the king -and of the world. - -Necho, after his successful advance, had retired to Egypt, and -Jehoiakim continued to be for three years his obsequious servant. An -event of tremendous importance for the world changed the entire -fortunes of Egypt and of Judah. Nineveh fell with a crash which -terrified the nations. We might apply to her the language which Isaiah -applies to her successor, Babylon:-- - -"Sheol from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming: it -stirreth up the shades for thee, even the Rephaim of the earth; it -hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations. All -they shall answer and say unto thee, 'Art thou also become weak as we? -art thou become like unto us?' ... All the kings of the nations, all -of them, sleep in glory, every one in his own house. But thou art cast -forth away from thy sepulchre like an abominable branch, as the -raiment of those that are slain, that are thrust through with the -sword, that go down to the stones of the pit.... They that see thee -shall narrowly look upon thee ... and say, 'Is this the man that made -the earth to tremble? that did shake kingdoms? that made the world as -a wilderness, and overthrew the cities thereof? that let not loose his -prisoners to their home?'"[778] - -Yes, Assyria had fallen like some mighty cedar in Libanus, and the -nations gazed without pity and with exultation on his torn and -scattered branches. - -And coincident with the fate of Nineveh had been the rise of the -Chaldæan power. - -Nabupalussur[779] had been a general of one of the last Assyrian kings, -and had been sent by him with an army to quell a Babylonian revolt. -Instead of this, he seized the city and made himself king. When the -final overthrow and obliteration of Nineveh had secured his power, he -sent his brave and brilliant son Nebuchadrezzar[780] (B.C. 605) to -secure the provinces which he had wrested from Assyria, and especially -to regain possession of Carchemish, which commanded the river. - -Necho marched to protect his conquests, and at Carchemish the hostile -forces encountered each other in a tremendous battle,--immemorial -Egypt under the representative of its age-long Pharaohs; Babylon, with -her independence of yesterday, under a prince hitherto unknown, whose -name was to become one of the most famous in the world. The result is -described by Jeremiah (xlvi. 1-12). Egypt was hopelessly defeated. Her -splendidly arrayed warriors were panic-stricken and routed; her chief -heroes were dashed to pieces by the heavy maces of the Babylonians, or -fled without so much as looking back. The scene was one of -"Magor-missabib"--terror on every side.[781] Pharaoh's host came up -like the Nile in flood with its Ethiopian hoplites and Asiatic -archers; but they were driven back. The daughter of Egypt received a -wound which no balm of Gilead could cure. The nations heard of her -shame, and the prophet pronounced her further chastisement by the -hands of Nebuchadrezzar. - -Then, in the fourth year of Jehoiakim, the young Babylonian conqueror -swept down upon Syria and Palestine like a bounding leopard, like an -avenging eagle (Hab. i. 7, 8). Jehoiakim had no choice but to change -his vassalhood to Necho for a vassalage to Nebuchadrezzar.[782] He -might have suffered severe consequences, but tidings came to the young -Chaldæan that his father had ended his reign of twenty-one years and -was dead. For fear lest disturbances might arise in his capital, he at -once dashed home across the desert with some light troops by way of -Tadmor, while he told his general to follow him home through Syria by -the longer route. He seems, however, to have carried away with him -some captives, among whom were Daniel, Ananias, Azarias, and -Misael,[783] destined hereafter for such memorable fortunes. Jehoiakim -himself was thrown into fetters to be carried into Babylon; but the -conqueror changed his mind, and probably thought that it would be -safer for the present to accept his pledges and assurances, and leave -him as his viceroy. "He took an oath of him," says Ezekiel (xvii. 13); -"he took also the mighty of the land."[784] - -For three years this frivolous egotist who occupied the throne of -Judah remained faithful to his covenant with the King of Babylon, but -at the end of that time he rebelled. In this rebellion he was again -deluded by the glamour of Egypt, and reliance on the empty promise of -"horses and much people." Ezekiel openly disapproved of this -policy,[785] and reproached the king for his faithlessness to his -oath. Jeremiah went further, and declared in the plainest language -that "Nebuchadrezzar would certainly come up and destroy this land, -and cause to cease from thence both man and beast."[786] - -Nearer and nearer the danger came. At first the King of Babylon was too -busy to do more than send against the Jewish rebel marauding bands of -Chaldæans, who acted in concert with the hereditary depredators of -Judah--Syrians, Moabites, and Ammonites. But the prophet knew that the -danger would not end there, believing that God would yet "remove Judah -out of His sight" for the unforgiven sins of Manasseh and the innocent -blood with which he had filled Jerusalem.[787] At last Nebuchadrezzar -had time to turn closer attention to the affairs of Judah, and this -became necessary because of the revolt of Tyre under its King Ithobalus. -In the stress of the peril Jehoiakim proclaimed a fast and a day of -humiliation in the Temple. Jeremiah was at this time "shut up"--either -in hiding, or in some sort of custody. As he could not go and preach in -person, he dictated his prophecy to Baruch, who wrote it on a scroll, -and went in the prophet's place to read it in the Lord's House to the -people there assembled from Jerusalem and all Judah in the chamber of -Gemariah, the son of Shaphan, in the inner court, by the new gate.[788] -Gemariah was the brother of Ahikam, the protector of the prophet. - -No one was more painfully alarmed by Jeremiah's prophecy than Micaiah, -the son of Gemariah, and he thought it his duty to go and tell his -father and the other princes what he had heard. They were assembled in -the scribe's chamber, and sent a courtier of Ethiopian race--Jehudi, -the son of Cushi--bidding him to bring the scroll with him, and to -come to them.[789] - -Baruch was a person of distinction. He was the brother of Seraiah, who -is called in our A.V. "a quiet prince," and in the margin "prince of -Menucha" or "chief chamberlain," literally "master of the -resting-place"; and he was the grandson of Maaseiah, "the governor" of -the city.[790] The office imposed on him by Jeremiah was so perilous -and painful that it nearly broke his heart. He exclaimed to Jeremiah, -"Woe is me now! the Lord hath added grief to my sorrow. I am weary -with my sighing, and I find no rest." The answer which the prophet was -commissioned to give him was very remarkable. It confirmed the -terrible doom on his native land, but added, "'And seekest thou great -things for thyself? Seek them not. For, behold, I will bring evil upon -all flesh,' saith the Lord: 'but thy life will I give unto thee for a -prey in all places whither thou goest.'"[791] - -Baruch obeyed the summons of the princes, and at their request sat -down with them and read the scroll in their ears. When they had heard -the portentous prophecy, they turned shuddering to one another, and -said, "We must tell the king of all these words." They asked Baruch -how he had written them, and he said he had taken them down at the -prophet's dictation. Then, knowing the storm which would burst over -the bold offenders, they said, "Go, hide thee, thou and Jeremiah, and -let no man know where ye be." - -Not daring to imperil the awful document, they laid it up in the -chamber of Elishama, the scribe, but went to the king and told him its -contents. He sent Jehudi to fetch it, and to read it in their hearing. -Jehoiakim and the illustrious company were seated in the -winter-chamber; for it was October, and a fire was burning in the -brazier, where Jehoiakim sat warming himself in the chilly weather. - -As he listened, he was filled not only with fury, but with contempt. -Such a message might well have caused him and his worst counsellors to -rend their clothes; but instead of this they adopted a tone of defiance. -By the time that Jehudi had read three or four columns, Jehoiakim -snatched the scribe's knife which hung at his girdle, and began to cut -up the scroll, with the intention of burning it. Seeing his purpose, -Gemariah, Elnathan, and Seraiah entreated him not to destroy it. But he -would not listen. He flung the fragments into the brazier, and they were -consumed. He ordered his son Jerahmeel,[792] with Seraiah and Shelemiah, -to seize both Baruch and Jeremiah, and bring them before him for -punishment. Doubtless they would have suffered the fate of Urijah, but -"the Lord hid them." There were enough persons of power on their side to -render their hiding-place secure. - -But the king's impious indifference, so far from making any difference -in the things that were, only brought down upon his guilt a fearful -doom. Truth cannot be cut to pieces, or burnt, or mechanically -suppressed. - - "Truth, crushed to earth, shall rise again; - The eternal years of God are hers: - But error, vanquished, writhes in pain, - And dies amid her worshippers." - -All the former denunciations, and new ones added to them, were -rewritten by Jeremiah and his faithful friend in their hiding-place, -and among them these words[793]:-- - -"Thus saith the Lord of Jehoiakim, King of Judah, 'He shall have none -to sit upon the throne of David; and his dead body shall be cast out -in the day to the heat, and in the night to the frost.'" - -A frightful drought added to the misery of this reign, but failed to -bring the wretched king to his senses. Jeremiah describes it[794]:-- - -"Judah mourneth, and the gates thereof languish; they bow down -mourning unto the ground; and the cry of Jerusalem is gone up. And the -nobles send their menials to the waters: they come to the pits, and -find no water; they return with their vessels empty; they are ashamed -and confounded, and cover their heads, because of the ground which is -chapped, for that no rain hath been in the land.... Yea, the hind also -in the field calveth, and forsaketh her young, because there is no -grass. And the wild asses stand on the bare heights, they pant for air -like jackals; their eyes fail, because there is no herbage." - -Even this affliction, so vividly and pathetically described, failed to -waken any repentance. And then the doom fell. Nebuchadrezzar advanced -in person against Jerusalem.[795] Even the hardy nomad Rechabites had -to fly before the Chaldæans, and to take refuge in the cities which -they hated. The sacred historian tells us nothing as to the manner of -the death of Jehoiakim, only saying that he "slept with his fathers": -his narrative of this period is exceedingly meagre. Josephus says that -Nebuchadrezzar slew him and the flower of the citizens, and sent three -thousand captives to Babylon.[796] Some imagine that he was killed by -the Babylonians in a raid outside the walls of Jerusalem, or "murdered -by his own people, and his body thrown for a time outside the walls." -If so, the Babylonians did not war with the dead. His remains, after -this "burial of an ass,"[797] may have been finally suffered to rest -in a tomb. The Septuagint says (2 Chron. xxxvi. 8) that he was buried -"in Ganosan," by which may be meant the sepulchre of Manasseh in the -garden of Uzza.[798] Not for him was the wailing cry "_Hoî, adon! Hoî, -hodo!_" ("Ah, Lord! Ah, his glory!"). - -"The memory of the wicked shall rot." Certainly this was the case with -Jehoiakim. The Chronicler mysteriously alludes to "his abominations -which he did, _and that which was found in him_."[799] The Rabbis, -interpreting this after their manner, say that "the thing found" was -the name of the demon Codonazor, to whom he had sold himself, which -after his death was discovered legibly written in Hebrew letters on -his skin. "Rabbi Johanan and Rabbi Eleazar debated what was meant by -'that which was found on him.' One said that he tattooed the name of -an idol upon his body (אמתו), and the other said that he had tattooed -the name of the god Recreon."[800] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[766] Not Jehoiakim, but Jehoiachin, as the sequel shows. - -[767] Ezek. xix. 5-9. The allusions to Jehoiakim by Jeremiah are -numerous, and all unfavourable (xxii. 13-19, xxvi. 20-23, xxxvi. -20-31, etc.) - -[768] Josephus (_Antt._, X. v. 2) is very severe on this king. He says -that "he was unjust in disposition, an evil-doer, neither pious -towards God nor just towards men." - -[769] Perhaps an allusion to a sort of fortified palace on Ophel. - -[770] Hab. ii. 9-11. - -[771] The text is perhaps corrupt. Two MSS. of the LXX. read "because -thou viest _with Ahab_," and the Vatican MSS. has "_with Ahaz_." -Cheyne adopts the former reading. - -[772] Jer. xxii. 13-17. - -[773] Jer. xxiii. 1. - -[774] Jer. xxii. 23. - -[775] Jer. xii. 5. - -[776] Jer. xxvi. 20-23. So far as I am aware, Bunsen stands alone in -identifying Urijah with the "Zechariah" who wrote Zech. xii.-xiv. -Others refer Zech. xii. 10 to the murder of Urijah. - -[777] Jer. xxvi. 18. - -[778] Isa. xiv., _passim_. - -[779] Nabu-pal-ussur, "Nebo protect the son." - -[780] Nabu-kudur-ussur, "Nebo protect the crown" (Schrader, ii. 48), or -"the youth" (Oppert). The portrait of Nebuchadrezzar--this is the proper -spelling, as generally in Jeremiah--is preserved for us on a black cameo -which he presented to the god Merodach. It is now in the Berlin Museum, -and shows strong but not cruel or ignoble characteristics. It is copied -in Riehm's _Handwörterbuch_, ii. 1067. The Jews, as they were fond of -doing to their enemies, made insulting puns on his name. Thus in the -_Vayyikra Rabba_ (Wünsche, _Bibl. Rabb._) the Three Children are -represented as saying to him, "You are Neboo-cad-netser: bark [_nabach_] -like a dog; swell like a water-jar [_kad_], and chirp like a cricket -[_tsertser_],"--in allusion to his madness. - -[781] Jer. xlvi. 5 (vi. 25). - -[782] Jos., _Antt._, X. xi.; Berosus, p. 11. The Chronicler and -Josephus show some confusion, caused by the similarity of the names -Jehoiakim and Jehoiachin. - -[783] Dan. i. 6. - -[784] We might infer from Ezek. xvii. 12 that Nebuchadrezzar actually -took Jehoiakim with him to Babylon. - -[785] Ezek. xvii. 15. - -[786] Jer. xxxvi. 29, xxv. 9, xxvi. 6. - -[787] 2 Kings xxiv. 2-4. - -[788] Grätz thinks that Jeremiah's roll was substantially Jer. xxv. - -[789] Jos., _Antt._, IX. ix. 1. - -[790] Jer. li. 59. Ewald, Hitzig, and others take the title to mean -"quartermaster" (2 Chron. xxxiv. 8). - -[791] Jer. xlv. 1-5. - -[792] Zeph. i. 8; 1 Kings xxii. 26; Jer. xxxvi. 26, A.V., "The son of -Hammelech." Comp. xxxviii. 6. _Hammelech_ may be a proper name, or a -prince of the blood-royal may be intended. - -[793] "The 'Book,' now as afterwards, was to be the death-blow of the -old regal, aristocratic, sacerdotal exclusiveness. The 'Scribe,' now -first rising into importance in the person of Baruch to supply the -defects of the living Prophet, was, as the printing-press in later -ages, handing on the words of truth, which else might have -irretrievably perished" (Stanley). - -[794] Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, p. 149; Jer. xiv. 1-xv. 9. - -[795] Nebuchadrezzar occupies a larger space in the Bible than any -heathen king, being spoken of in 2 Kings, 2 Chronicles, Ezra, -Nehemiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel. - -[796] For further details of Jehoiakim see 1 Esdras i. 38: "He bound -Joakim and the nobles; _but Zaraces_ his brother he apprehended, and -brought him out of Egypt." The allusion is entirely obscure, and -probably arises from some corruption of the text. The literal -rendering is: "And _Joakim_ bound the nobles; but Zaraces his brother -he apprehended, and brought him out of Egypt." Zaraces might be a -corruption for Zedekiah, who was Jehoiakim's half-brother. Some think -that Zaraces is a corruption for Urijah, and "his brother" a clerical -error. - -[797] Jer. xxxvi. 30, xxii. 19. - -[798] LXX., καὶ ἐκοιμήθη Ἰωακεὶμ ἐν Γανοζὰν μετὰ τῶν πατέρων ἑαυτοῦ. - -[799] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 8. - -[800] _Sanhedrin_, f. 104, 2. For another allusion see _id._ 49, 1; -Hershon, _Treasures of the Talmud_, p. 232. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXV - - _JEHOIACHIN_ - - B.C. 597 - - 2 KINGS xxiv. 8-16 - - "There are times when ancient truths become modern falsehoods, - when the signs of God's dispensations are made so clear by the - course of natural events as to supersede the revelations of even - their most sacred past."--STANLEY, _Lectures_, ii. 521. - - -Jehoiachin--"Jehovah maketh steadfast"--who is also called Jeconiah, -and--perhaps with intentional slight--Coniah, succeeded, at the age of -eighteen, to the miserable and distracted heritage of the throne of -Judah. The "eight years old" of the Chronicler must be a clerical -error, for he had a harem. He only reigned for three months; and the -historian pronounces over him, as over all the four kings of the House -of Josiah, the stereotyped condemnation of evil-doing. Was there -anything in the manner in which Josiah had trained his family which -could account for their unsatisfactoriness? In Jehoiachin's case we do -not know what his transgressions were, but perhaps his mother's -influence rendered him as little favourable to the prophetic party as -his brother Jehoiakim had been. For the _Gebîrah_ was Nehushta, the -daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem. Her name means apparently "Brass," -and nothing can be deduced from it; but her father Elnathan was (as we -have seen) the envoy who, by order of Jehoiakim, had dragged back from -Egypt the martyr-prophet Urijah.[801] - -Brief as was his reign of three months and ten days[802]--a hundred -days, like that of his unhappy uncle Jehoahaz--he is largely alluded -to by the contemporary prophets. - -Indignant at the sins and apostasies of Judah, and convinced that her -retribution was nigh at hand, Jeremiah took with him an earthen pot to -the Valley of Hinnom, and there shivered it to pieces at Tophet in the -presence of certain elders of the people and of the priests, -explaining that his symbolic action indicated the destruction of -Jerusalem. On hearing the tenor of these prophecies, the priest -Pashur, who was officer of the Temple, smote Jeremiah in the face, and -put him in the stocks in a prominent place by the Temple gate.[803] -Jeremiah in return prophesied that Pashur and all his family should be -carried into captivity, so that his name should be changed from Pashur -to Magor-Missabib, "Terror on every side." - -Against the king himself he pronounced the doom: "'As I live,' saith the -Lord, 'though Coniah, the son of Jehoiakim, King of Judah, were the -signet on My right hand, yet will I pluck thee thence; and I will give -thee into the hands of them that seek thy life, ... even into the hand -of Nebuchadrezzar.... And I will hurl thee, and thy mother that bare -thee, into another country;[804] ... and there shall ye die.' ... Is -this man Coniah a despised broken piece of work? is he a vessel wherein -is no pleasure? wherefore are they hurled, he and his seed, and cast -into a land which they know not? O land, land, land! hear the word of -the Lord. Thus saith the Lord, 'Write ye this man childless, a man that -shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, -sitting upon the throne of David, or ruling any more in Judah.'" - -Yet there must have been something in Jeconiah which impressed -favourably the minds of men. Brief as was his reign, his memory was -never forgotten. We learn from the _Mishna_ that one of the gates of -Jerusalem--probably that by which he left the city--for ever bore his -name.[805] Josephus says that his captivity was annually commemorated. -Jeremiah writes in the Lamentations:-- - -"Our pursuers are swifter than the eagles of heaven: they have pursued -us upon the mountains, they have laid wait for us in the wilderness. The -breath of our nostrils, the anointed of the Lord, was taken in their -pits, of whom we said, 'Under his shadow we shall live among the -heathen.'" - -Ezekiel compares him to a young lion:-- - -"He went up and down among the lions, he became a young lion, and -learned to catch the prey. And he knew their palaces, and laid waste -their cities; and the land was desolate, and the fulness thereof, by -the noise of his roaring. Then the nations set against him on every -side from the provinces, and spread their net over him: he was taken -in their pit. And they put him in ward in hooks, and brought him to -the King of Babylon: they brought him into holds, that his voice -should no more be heard upon the mountains of Israel."[806] - -A prince of whom a contemporary prophet could thus write was obviously -no _fainéant_. Indeed, the energetic measures which Nebuchadrezzar -adopted against him may have been due to the fact that he had -endeavoured to rouse his discouraged people. But what could he do -against such a power as that of the Chaldæans? Nebuchadrezzar sent his -generals against Jerusalem; and when it was ripe for capture, advanced -in person to take possession of it. Resistance had become hopeless; -there lay no chance in anything but that complete submission which -might possibly avert the worst effects of the destruction of the city. -Accordingly, Jeconiah, accompanied by his mother, his court, his -princes, and his officers, went out in procession, and threw -themselves on the mercy of the King of Babylon. Nebuchadrezzar was far -less brutal than the Sargons and Assurbanipals of Assyria; but Judah -had twice revolted, and the defection of Tyre showed him that the -affairs of Palestine could no longer be neglected. He thoroughly -despoiled the Temple and the palace, and carried the spoils to -Babylon, as Isaiah had forewarned Hezekiah should be the case.[807] -That he might further weaken and humiliate the city, he stripped it of -its king, its royal house, its court, its nobles, its soldiers, even -its craftsmen and smiths, and carried ten thousand eight hundred and -thirty-two captives to Babylon (Jos., _Antt._, X. vii. 1), among whom -was the prophet Ezekiel. He naturally spared Jeremiah, who regarded -him as "the sword of Jehovah" (Jer. xlvii. 6), and as "Jehovah's -servant, to do His pleasure" (Jer. xxv. 9, xxvii. 6, xliii. 10). On -the whole, Nebuchadrezzar is not treated with abhorrence by the Jews. -There was something in his character which inspired respect; and the -Jews deal with him leniently, both in their records and generally in -their traditions. "Nebuchadnezzar," we read in the Talmud (_Taanith_ -f. 18, 2), "was a worthy king, and deserved that a miracle should be -performed through him." - -From the allusion of Ezekiel we might infer that Jehoiachin was -violent and self-willed; but Josephus speaks of his kindness and -gentleness.[808] Was he, as Jeremiah had prophesied, literally -"childless"?[809] It is true that in 1 Chron. iii. 17, 18, eight sons -are ascribed to him, and among them Shealtiel, in whom the royal line -was continued. But it is far from certain that these sons were not the -sons of his brother Neri, of the House of Nathan,[810] and it seems -that they were only adopted by the unhappy captive. The Book of Baruch -describes him weeping by the Euphrates.[811] But if we may trust the -story of Susannah, his outward fortunes were peaceful, and he was -allowed to live in his own house and gardens in peace, and in a -certain degree of splendour.[812] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[801] Jer. xxvi. 22. - -[802] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 9. - -[803] Jer. xx. 2. There seem to have been special "stocks" and "collars" -in the Temple, reserved, by order of the priest Jehoiada, for those whom -the priests regarded as unruly prophets (Jer. xxix. 26). - -[804] Jer. xxii. 24-30. The captivity of the queen-mother struck men's -imaginations (Jer. xxix. 2). - -[805] _Middoth_, ii. 6, quoted by Cheyne, p. 163; Jos., _B. J._, VI. -ii. 1. Comp. Ezek. i. 2. - -[806] Ezek. xix. 6-9. The special allusions are no longer certain. - -[807] 2 Kings xx. 17. The expression "_he cut to pieces_ all the -vessels of gold which Solomon had made" is hardly consistent with Ezra -i. 7-11, unless we understand the word in a loose sense. - -[808] He says that he nobly gave himself up to save the city (_Antt._, -X. vii. 1). His captivity was made an era from which to date Ezek. i. -2, viii. 1, xxiv. 1, xxvi. 1, etc. Comp. Susannah 1-4. - -[809] Jer. xxii. 30, '_arîrî_. His "son" Assir (1 Chron. iii. 17) may -have been made an eunuch (Isa. xxxix. 7). - -[810] Luke iii. 27, 31; Matt. i. 12. - -[811] Baruch i. 3, 4. - -[812] The favourable notice of Nebuchadrezzar in _Taanith_ (quoted -above) is not found in _Berachoth_, f. 57, 2, where he is called "the -wicked." There are many wild legends about him. In _Nedarim_ (f. 65, -2), R. Yitzchak says: "May melted gold be poured into the mouth of the -wicked Nebuchadrezzar! Had not an angel struck him on the mouth, he -would have outshone all David's songs and praises." With reference to -Isa. xxii. 1, 2, the Rabbis say that Jeconiah went to the Temple roof, -and flung up the keys into the air, when Nebuchadrezzar required them: -"a hand took them, and they were seen no more" (_Shekalim_, vi. 5). In -_Nedarim_ (f. 65, 2) we are told that Zedekiah's rebellion consisted -in divulging, contrary to his oath, that he had seen Nebuchadrezzar -eating a live hare (Hershon, _Treasures of the Talmud_). - - - - - CHAPTER XXXVI - - _ZEDEKIAH, THE LAST KING OF JUDAH_ - - B.C. 597-586 - - 2 KINGS xxiv. 18-xxv. 7 - - "Quand ce grand Dieu a choisi quelqu'un pour être l'instrument de - ses desseins rien n'arrête le cours, où il enchaine, où il - aveugle, où il dompte tout ce qui est capable de résistance." - BOSSUET, _Oraison funèbre de Henriette Marie_. - - -When Jehoiachin was carried captive to Babylon, never to return, his -uncle Mattaniah ("Jehovah's gift"), the third son of Josiah, was put -by Nebuchadrezzar in his place. In solemn ratification of the new -king's authority, the Babylonian conqueror sanctioned the change of -his name to Zedekiah ("Jehovah's righteousness").[813] He was -twenty-one at his accession, and he reigned eleven years. - -"Behold," writes Ezekiel, "the King of Babylon came to Jerusalem, and -took the king thereof, and the princes thereof, and brought them to -him to Babylon; and he took of the seed royal" (_i.e._, Zedekiah), -"_and made a covenant with him; he also brought him under an oath: and -took away the mighty of the land, that the kingdom might be base, that -it might not lift itself up, but that by keeping of his covenant it -might stand_."[814] - -Perhaps by this covenant Zechariah meant to emphasise the meaning of -his name, and to show that he would reign in righteousness. - -The prophet at the beginning of the chapter describes Nebuchadrezzar -and Jehoiachin in "a riddle." - -"A great eagle," he says, "with great wings and long pinions, full of -feathers, which had divers colours, came unto Lebanon, and took the -top of the cedar" (Jehoiachin): "he cropped off the topmost of the -young twigs thereof, and carried it into a land of traffic; he set it -in a city of merchants. He took also of the seed of the land" -(Zedekiah), "and planted it in a fruitful soil; he placed it beside -great waters, he set it as a willow tree. And it grew, and became a -spreading vine of low stature, whose branches turned towards him, and -the roots thereof were under him: so it became a vine, and brought -forth branches, and shot forth sprigs."[815] - -The words refer to the first three years of Zedekiah's reign, and they -imply, consistently with the views of the prophets, that, if the weak -king had been content with the lowly eminence to which God had called -him, and if he had kept his oath and covenant with Babylon, all might -yet have been well with him and his land. At first it seemed likely to -be so; for Zedekiah wished to be faithful to Jehovah. He made a -covenant with all the people to set free their Hebrew slaves. Alas! it -was very shortlived. Self-sacrifice cost something, and the princes -soon took back the discarded bondservants.[816] What made this conduct -the more shocking was that their covenant to obey the law had been -made in the most solemn manner by "cutting a calf in twain, and -passing between the severed halves."[817] But the weak king was -perfectly powerless in the hands of his tyrannous aristocracy.[818] - -The exiles in Babylon were now the best and most important section of -the nation. Jeremiah compares them to good figs; while the remnant at -Jerusalem were bad and withered. He and Ezekiel raised their voices, -as in strophe and antistrophe, for the teaching alike of the exiles -and of the remnant left at Jerusalem, for whom the exiles were bidden -to entreat God in prayer. Zedekiah himself made at least one journey -northward, either voluntarily or under summons, to renew his oath and -reassure Nebuchadrezzar of his fidelity.[819] He was accompanied by -Seraiah, the brother of Baruch, who was privately entrusted by -Jeremiah with a prophecy of the fall of Babylon, which he was to fling -into the midst of the Euphrates.[820] - -The last King of Judah seems to have been weak rather than wicked. He -was a reed shaken by the wind. He yielded to the influence of the last -person who argued with him; and he seems to have dreaded above all -things the personal ridicule, danger, and opposition which it was his -duty to have defied. Yet we cannot withhold from him our deep -sympathy; for he was born in terrible times--to witness the -death-throes of his country's agony, and to share in them. It was no -longer a question of independence, but only of the choice of -servitudes. Judah was like a silly and trembling sheep between two -huge beasts of prey.[821] - -Only thus can we account for the strange apostasies--"the abominations -of the heathen"--with which he permitted the Temple to be polluted; -and for the ill-treatment which he allowed to be inflicted on Jeremiah -and other prophets, to whom in his heart he felt inclined to listen. - -What these abominations were we read with amazement in the eighth -chapter of Ezekiel. The prophet is carried in vision to Jerusalem, and -there he sees the Asherah--"the image which provoketh to -jealousy"--which had so often been erected and destroyed and re-erected. -Then through a secret door he sees creeping things, and abominable -beasts, and the idol-blocks of the House of Israel portrayed upon the -wall, while several elders of Israel stood before them and adored, with -censers in their hands--among whom he must specially have grieved to see -Jaazaneiah, the son of Shaphan,[822] flattering himself, as did his -followers, that in that dark chamber Jehovah saw them not. Next at the -northern gate he sees Zion's daughters weeping for Tammuz, or Adonis. -Once more, in the inner court of the Temple, between the porch and the -altar, he sees about twenty-five men with their backs to the altar, and -their faces to the east; and they worshipped the sun towards the east; -and, lo! they put the vine branch to their nose.[823] Were not these -crimes sufficient to evoke the wrath of Jehovah, and to alienate His ear -from prayers offered by such polluted worshippers? Egypt, Assyria, -Syria, Chaldæa, all contributed their idolatrous elements to the -detestable syncretism; and the king and the priests ignored, permitted, -or connived at it.[824] This must surely be answered for. How could it -have been otherwise? The king and the priests were the official -guardians of the Temple, and these aberrations could not have gone on -without their cognisance. There was another party of sheer formalists, -headed by men like the priest Pashur, who thought to make talismans of -rites and shibboleths, but had no sincerity of heart-religion.[825] To -these, too, Jeremiah was utterly opposed. In his opinion Josiah's -reformation had failed. Neither Ark, nor Temple, nor sacrifice were -anything in the world to him in comparison with true religion. All the -prophets with scarcely one exception are anti-ritualists; but none more -decidedly so than the prophet-priest. His name is associated in -tradition with the hiding of the Ark, and a belief in its ultimate -restoration; yet to Jeremiah, apart from the moral and spiritual truths -of which it was the material symbol, the Ark was no better than a wooden -chest. His message from Jehovah is, "I will give you pastors according -to My heart, ... and they shall say no more, 'The Ark of the Covenant of -the Lord': neither shall it come to mind; neither shall they remember -it; neither shall they miss it; neither shall it be made any more."[826] - -Doom followed the guilt and folly of king, priests, and people. If -political wisdom were insufficient to show Zedekiah that the necessities -of the case were an indication of God's will, he had the warnings of the -prophets constantly ringing in his ears, and the assurance that he must -remain faithful to Nebuchadrezzar. But he was in fear of his own princes -and courtiers. A combined embassy reached him from the kings of Edom, -Ammon, Moab, Tyre and Sidon, urging him to join in a league against -Babylon.[827] This embassy was supported by a powerful party in -Jerusalem. Their solicitations were rendered more plausible by the -recent accession (B.C. 590) of the young and vigorous Pharaoh -Hophrah--the Apries of Herodotus[828]--to the throne of Egypt, and by -the recrudescence of that incurable disease of Hebrew politics, a -confidence in the idle promises of Egypt to supply the confederacy with -men and horses.[829] In vain did Jeremiah and Ezekiel uplift their -warning voices. The blind confidence of the king and of the nobles was -sustained by the flattering visions and promises of false prophets, -prominent among whom was a certain Hananiah, the son of Azur, of Gibeon, -"the prophet."[830] To indicate the futility of the contemplated -rebellion, Jeremiah had made "throngs and poles" with yokes, and had -sent them to the kings, whose embassy had reached Jerusalem, with a -message of the most emphatic distinctness, that Nebuchadrezzar was God's -appointed servant, and that they must serve him till God's own appointed -time. If they obeyed this intimation, they would be left undisturbed in -their own lands; if they disobeyed it, they would be scourged into -absolute submission by the sword, the famine, and the pestilence. -Jeremiah delivered the same oracle to his own king.[831] - -The warning was rendered unavailing by the conduct of Hananiah. He -prophesied that within two full years God would break the yoke of the -King of Babylon; and that the captive Jeconiah, and the nobles, and -the vessels of the House of the Lord would be brought back. Jeremiah, -by way of an acted parable, had worn round his neck one of his own -yokes. Hananiah, in the Temple, snatched it off, broke it to pieces, -and said, "So will I break the yoke of Nebuchadrezzar from the neck of -all nations within the space of two full years."[832] - -We can imagine the delight, the applause, the enthusiasm with which -the assembled people listened to these bold predictions. Hananiah -argued with them, to speak, in shorthand, for he appealed to their -desires and to their prejudices. It is always the tendency of nations -to say to their prophets, "Say not unto us hard things: speak smooth -things; prophesy deceits." - -Against Hananiah personally there seems to have been no charge, except -that in listening to the lying spirit of his own desires he could not -hear the true message of God. But he did not stand alone.[833] Among -the children of the captivity, his promises were echoed by two -downright false prophets, Ahab and Zedekiah, the son of Maaseiah, who -prophesied lies in God's name. They were men of evil life, and a -fearful fate overtook them. Their words against Babylon came to the -ears of Nebuchadrezzar, and they were "roasted in the fire," so that -the horror of their end passed into a proverb and a curse.[834] Truly -God fed these false prophets with wormwood, and gave them poisonous -water to drink.[835] - -After the action of Hananiah, Jeremiah went home stricken and ashamed: -apparently he never again uttered a public discourse in the Temple. It -took him by surprise; and he was for the moment, perhaps, daunted by -the plausive echo of the multitude to the lying prophet. But when he -got home the answer of Jehovah came: "Go and tell Hananiah, Thou hast -broken the yokes of wood; but thou hast made for them yokes of iron. I -have put a yoke of iron on the necks of all these nations, that they -may serve Nebuchadrezzar. Hear now, Hananiah, The Lord hath not sent -thee: thou makest this people to trust in a lie. Behold, this year -thou shalt die, because thou hast spoken revolt against the Lord. What -hath the chaff to do with the wheat? saith the Lord."[836] - -Two months after Hananiah lay dead, and men's minds were filled with -fear. They saw that God's word was indeed as a fire to burn, and as a -hammer to dash in pieces.[837] But meanwhile Zedekiah had been -over-persuaded to take the course which the true prophets had -forbidden. Misled by the false prophets and mincing prophetesses whom -Ezekiel denounced,[838] who daubed men's walls with whitened plaster, -he had sent an embassy to Pharaoh Hophrah, asking for an army of -infantry and cavalry to support his rebellion from Assyria.[839] In -the eyes of Jeremiah and Ezekiel the crime did not only consist in -defying the exhortations of those whom Zedekiah knew to be Jehovah's -accredited messengers. In mitigation of this offence he might have -pleaded the extreme difficulty of discriminating the truth amid the -ceaseless babble of false pretenders.[840] But, on the other hand, he -had broken the solemn oath which he had taken to Nebuchadrezzar in the -name of God, and the sacred covenant which he seems to have twice -ratified with him.[841] This it was which raised the indignation of -the faithful, and led Ezekiel to prophesy:-- - - "Shall he prosper? - Shall he escape that doeth such things? - Or shall he break the covenant and be believed? - 'As I live,' saith the Lord God, 'surely in the place where the king - dwelleth that made him king, - Whose oath he despised and whose covenant he broke, - Even with him in the midst of Babylon, shall he die.'"[842] - -Sad close for a dynasty which had now lasted for nearly five centuries! - -As for Pharaoh, he too was an eagle, as Nebuchadrezzar was--a great -eagle with great wings and many feathers, but not so great. The -trailing vine of Judah bent her roots towards him, but it should -wither in the furrows when the east wind touched it.[843] - -The result of Zedekiah's alliance with Egypt was the intermission of -his yearly tribute to Assyria; and at last, in the ninth year of -Zedekiah, Nebuchadrezzar was aroused to put down this Palestinian -revolt, supported as it was by the vague magnificence of Egypt. -Jeremiah had said, "Pharaoh, the King of Egypt, is but a noise [or -desolation]: he hath passed the time appointed."[844] - -This was about the year 589. In 598 Nebuchadrezzar had carried -Jehoachin into captivity, and ever since then some of his forces had -been engaged in the vain effort to capture Tyre, which still, after a -ten years' siege, drew its supplies from the sea, and remained -impregnable on her island rock. He did not choose to raise this -long-continued siege by diverting the troops to beleaguer so strong a -fortress as Jerusalem, and therefore he came in person from Babylon. - -In Ezek. xxi. 20-24 we have a singular and vivid glimpse of his march. -On his way he came to a spot where two roads branched off before him. -One led to Rabbath, the capital of Ammon, on the east of Jordan; the -other to Jerusalem, on the west. Which road should he take? Personally, -it was a matter of indifference; so he threw the burden of -responsibility upon his gods by leaving the decision to the result of -belomancy.[845] Taking in his hand a sheaf of brightened arrows, he held -them upright, and decided to take the route indicated by the fall of the -greater number of arrows. He confirmed his uncertainty by consulting -teraphim, and by hepatoscopy--_i.e._, by examining the liver of slain -victims. Rabbath and the Ammonites were not to be spared, but it was -upon the covenant-breaking king and city that the first vengeance was to -fall.[846] And this is what the prophet has to say to Zedekiah:-- - -"And thou, O deadly-wounded wicked one, the prince of Israel, whose -day is come in the time of the iniquity of the end; thus saith the -Lord God, 'Remove the mitre, and take off the crown. This shall be not -thus. Exalt the low, and abase that which is high. An overthrow, -overthrow, overthrow, will I make it: this also shall be no more, -until He come whose right it is: and I will give it Him."[847] - -So (B.C. 587) Jerusalem was delivered over to siege, even as Ezekiel -had sketched upon a tile.[848] It was to be assailed in the old -Assyrian manner--as we see it represented in the British Museum -bas-relief, where Sennacherib is portrayed in the act of besieging -Lachish--with forts, mounds, and battering-rams; and Ezekiel had also -been bidden to put up an iron plate between him and his pictured city, -to represent the mantelet from behind which the archers shot. - -In this dread crisis Zedekiah sent Zephaniah, the son of Maaseiah, the -priest, and Jehucal, to Jeremiah, entreating his prayers for the -city,[849] for he had not yet been put in prison. Doubtless he prayed, -and at first it looked as if deliverance would come. Pharaoh Hophrah -put in motion the Egyptian army with its Carian mercenaries and -Soudanese negroes, and Nebuchadrezzar was sufficiently alarmed to -raise the siege and go to meet the Egyptians. The hopes of the people -probably rose high, though multitudes seized the opportunity to fly to -the mountains.[850] The circumstances closely resembled those under -which Sennacherib had raised the siege of Jerusalem to go to meet -Tirhakah the Ethiopian; and perhaps there were some, and the king -among them, who looked that such a wonder might be vouchsafed to him -through the prayers of Jeremiah as had been vouchsafed to Hezekiah -through the prayers of Isaiah. Not for a moment did Jeremiah encourage -these vain hopes. To Zephaniah, as to an earlier deputation from the -king, when he sent Pashur with him to inquire of the prophet, Jeremiah -returned a remorseless answer. It is too late. Pharaoh shall be -defeated; even if the Chaldæan army were smitten, its wounded soldiers -would suffice to besiege and burn Jerusalem, and take into captivity -the miserable inhabitants after they had suffered the worst horrors of -a besieged city.[851] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[813] Comp. Jer. xxiii. 6: Jehovah-Tsidkenu. - -[814] Ezek. xvii. 12-14. - -[815] Ezek. xvii. 1-6. - -[816] Jer. xxxiv. 8-11. - -[817] Jer. xxxiv. 19. Comp. Gen. xv. 17. - -[818] This is strikingly shown by his piteous remark to them in Jer. -xxxviii. 5. - -[819] He first sent two of Jeremiah's friends, Elasah and Gemariah, -the son of Shaphan. - -[820] Some critics have doubted the authenticity of Jer. li., lii. - -[821] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 14-21; Stanley, ii. 528; Milman, i. 394. - -[822] Shaphan's other sons, Gemariah, Ahikam, Elasah, and his grandson -Gedaliah, were friends of Jeremiah. - -[823] Ezek. viii. 17. The allusion seems to be to a custom like that -of the Parsees, who hold a branch of tamarisk or pomegranate twigs -(called _barsom_) before their mouths when they adore the sacred fire. -Strabo, xv. 732; Spiegel, _Zendavesta_, ii., p. lxviii; _Eran. -Alterthumsk._, iii. 571 (Orelli, _ad loc._). Lightfoot explains it, -"add fuel to their wrath." - -[824] Ezek. xvi. 15-34. - -[825] Jer. vii. 4, 21-28, viii. 8, xxiii. 31-33, xxxi. 33, 34. - -[826] Jer. iii. 15, 16. - -[827] Jer. xxvii. 3. - -[828] Herod., ii. 161. - -[829] Psammis, the son of Necho, only reigned six years; Hophrah (B.C. -594) was his son. - -[830] The LXX. calls him "the false prophet." - -[831] Jer. xxvii. 1-8, 12-18. On vv. 16-22 see the LXX. - -[832] Here (Jer. xxviii. 11, and in xxxiv. 1, xxxix. 5) the name is -written "Nebuchadnezzar"; everywhere else in Jeremiah it is -"Nebuchadrezzar." - -[833] Part of his dispute with Jeremiah turned on the recovery or -non-recovery of the Temple vessels. Zedekiah is said to have given a -set of silver vessels to replace the old ones (Baruch i. 8). - -[834] Jer. xxix. 21-23. - -[835] Jer. xxiii. 9-32. - -[836] Jer. xxviii. 13-16, xxiii. 28. - -[837] Jer. xxiii. 29. - -[838] Ezek. xiii. 1-23. - -[839] Ezek. xvii. 25. - -[840] Josephus rightly attributes the unfortunate career of Zedekiah -to the weakness with which he listened to evil counsellors, and to the -insolent multitude. - -[841] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 13; Jer. lii. 3. - -[842] Ezek. xvii. 15, 16, 18, 19. - -[843] Ezek. xvii. 7-10. - -[844] Jer. xlvi. 17. - -[845] Another form of belomancy is still commonly practised among the -Arabs. Three arrows are placed in a vessel: on one of them is written, -"My God permits me"; on another, "My God forbids me"; the third is -blank. They are then shaken, and the decision is guided by the one -which falls out first. Comp. Homer, _Iliad_, iii. 316; _Speaker's -Commentary_, _ad loc._ - -[846] Ezek. xxi. 28-32. - -[847] An allusion to the restoration of Jeconiah or his descendants, -and to the far-off Messiah, meek and lowly. - -[848] Ezek. iv. 1-3. - -[849] Jer. xxxvii. 3. - -[850] Ezek. vii. 16. - -[851] Jer. xxi. 1-10, xxxvii. 1-17. Josephus says that Pharaoh was -defeated (_Antt._, X. vii. 3). Jeremiah merely says that he and his -army returned to their own land. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXVII - - _JEREMIAH AND HIS PROPHECIES_ - - JER. i. 1-v. 31 - - "Count me o'er earth's chosen heroes--they were souls that - stood alone, - While the men they agonised for hurled the contumelious - stone; - Stood serene, and down the future saw the golden beam incline - To the side of perfect justice, mastered by their faith - divine, - By one man's plain truth to manhood and to God's supreme - design." - LOWELL. - - -Truly Jeremiah was a prophet of evil. The king might have addressed -him in the words with which Agamemnon reproaches Kalchas.[852] - - "Augur accursed! denouncing mischief still: - Prophet of plagues, for ever boding ill! - Still must that tongue some wounding message bring, - And still thy priestly pride provoke thy king." - -Never was there a sadder man.[853] Like Phocion, he believed in the -enemies of his country more than he believed in his own people. He saw -"Too late" written upon everything. He saw himself all but universally -execrated as a coward, as a traitor, as one who weakened the nerves -and damped the courage of those who were fighting against fearful odds -for their wives and children, the ashes of their fathers, their -altars, and their hearths. It had become his fixed conviction that any -prophets--and there were a multitude of them--who prophesied peace -were false prophets, and _ipso facto_ proved themselves conspirators -against the true well-being of the land.[854] In point of fact, -Jeremiah lived to witness the death-struggle of the idea of religion -in its predominantly national character (vii. 8-16, vi. 8). "The -continuity of the national faith refused to be bound up with the -continuance of the nation. When the nation is dissolved into -individual elements, the continuity and ultimate victory of the true -faith depends on the relations of Jehovah to individual souls out of -which the nation shall be bound up."[855] - -And now a sad misfortune happened to Jeremiah. His home was not at -Jerusalem, but at Anathoth, though he had long been driven from his -native village by the murderous plots of his own kindred, and of those -who had been infuriated by his incessant prophecies of doom. When the -Chaldæans retired from Jerusalem to encounter Pharaoh, he left the -distressed city for the land of Benjamin, "to receive his portion from -thence in the midst of the people"--apparently, for the sense is -doubtful, to claim his dues of maintenance as a priest. But at the -city gate he was arrested by Irijah, the son of Shelemiah, the captain -of the watch, who charged him with the intention of deserting to the -Chaldæans. Jeremiah pronounced the charge to be a lie; but Irijah took -him before the princes, who hated him, and consigned him to dreary and -dangerous imprisonment in the house of Jonathan the scribe. In the -vaults of this "house of the pit" he continued many days.[856] The -king sympathised with him: he would gladly have delivered him, if he -could, from the rage of the princes; but he did not dare.[857] - -Meanwhile, the siege went on, and the people never forgot the anguish -of despair with which they waited the reinvestiture of the city. Ever -since that day it has been kept as a fast--the fast of Tebeth. -Zedekiah, yearning for some advice, or comfort--if comfort were to be -had--from the only man whom he really trusted, sent for Jeremiah to -the palace, and asked him in despicable secrecy, "Is there any word -from the Lord?" The answer was the old one: "Yes! Thou shalt be -delivered into the hands of the King of Babylon." Jeremiah gave it -without quailing, but seized the opportunity to ask on what plea he -was imprisoned. Was he not a prophet? Had he not prophesied the return -of the Chaldæan host? Where now were all the prophets who had -prophesied peace? Would not the king at least save him from the -detestable prison in which he was dying by inches? - -The king heard his petition, and he was removed to a better prison in -the court of the watch, where he received his daily piece of bread out -of the bakers' street until all the bread in the city was spent. - -For now utter famine came upon the wretched Jews, to add to the -horrors and accidents of the siege. If we would know what that famine -was in its appalling intensity, we must turn to the Book of -Lamentations. Those elegies, so unutterably plaintive, may not be by -the prophet himself, but only by his school; but they show us what was -the frightful condition of the people of Jerusalem before and during -the last six months of the siege. "The sword of the wilderness"--the -roving and plundering Bedouin--made it impossible to get out of the -city in any direction. Things were as dreadfully hopeless as they had -been in Samaria when it was besieged by Benhadad.[858] Hunger and -thirst reduce human nature to its most animal conditions. They -obliterate the merest elements of morality. They make men like beasts, -and reveal the ferocity which is never quite dead in any but the -purest and loftiest souls. They arouse the least human instincts of -the aboriginal animal. The day came when there was no more bread left -in Jerusalem.[859] The fair and ruddy Nazarites, who had been purer -than snow, whiter than milk, more ruddy than corals, lovely as -sapphires, became like withered boughs,[860] and even their friends -did not recognise them in those ghastly and emaciated figures which -crept about the streets. The daughters of Zion, more cruel in their -hunger than the very jackals, lost the instincts of pity and -motherhood. Mothers and fathers devoured their own little unweaned -children.[861] There was parricide as well as infanticide in the -horrible houses. They seemed to plead that none could blame them, -since the lives of many had become an intolerable anguish, and no man -had bread for his little ones, and their tongues cleaved to the roof -of their mouth. All that happened six centuries later, during the -siege of Jerusalem by Titus, happened now. Then Martha the daughter of -Nicodemus ben-Gorion, once a lady of enormous wealth, was seen picking -the grains of corn from the offal of the streets; now the women who -had fed delicately and been brought up in scarlet were seen sitting -desolate on heaps of dung.[862] And Jehovah did not raise His hand to -save His guilty and dying people. It was too late! - -And as is always the case in such extremities, there were men who stood -defiant and selfish amid the universal misery. Murder, oppression, and -luxury continued to prevail. The godless nobles did not intermit the -building of their luxurious houses, asserting to themselves and others -that, after all, the final catastrophe was not near at hand. The sudden -death of one of them--Pelatiah, the son of Benaiah--while Ezekiel was -prophesying, terrified the prophet so much that he flung himself on his -face and cried with a loud voice, "Ah, Lord God! wilt Thou make a full -end of the remnant of Israel?" But on the others this death by the -visitation of God seems to have produced no effect; and the glory of God -left the city, borne away upon its cherubim-chariot.[863] - -Even under the stress of these dreadful circumstances the Jews held -out with that desperate tenacity which has often been shown by nations -fighting behind strong walls for their very existence, but by no -nation more decidedly than by the Jews. And if the rebel-party, and -the lying prophets who had brought the city to this pass, still -entertained any hopes either of a diversion caused by Pharaoh Hophrah, -or of some miraculous deliverance such as that which had saved the -city from Sennacherib years earlier, it is not unnatural that they -should have regarded Jeremiah with positive fury. For he still -continued to prophesy the captivity. What specially angered them was -his message to the people that all who remained in Jerusalem should -die by the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, but that those who -deserted to the Chaldæans should live. It was on the ground of his -having said this that they had imprisoned him as a deserter; and when -Pashur and his son Gedaliah heard that he was still saying this, they -and the other princes entreated Zedekiah to put him to death as a -pernicious traitor, who weakened the hands of the patriot soldiers. -Jeremiah was not guilty of the lack of patriotism with which they -charged him. The day of independence had passed for ever, and Babylon, -not Egypt, was the appointed suzerain. The counselling of -submission--as many a victorious chieftain has been forced at last to -counsel it, from the days of Hannibal to those of Thiers--is often the -true and the only possible patriotism in doomed and decadent nations. -Zedekiah timidly abandoned the prophet to the rage of his enemies; but -being afraid to murder him openly as Urijah had been murdered, they -flung him into a well in the dungeon of Malchiah, the king's son. Into -the mire of this pit he sank up to the arms, and there they purposely -left him to starve and rot.[864] But if no Israelite pitied him, his -condition moved the compassion of Ebed-Melech, an Ethiopian, one of -the king's eunuch-chamberlains. He hurried to the king in a storm of -pity and indignation. He found him sitting, as a king should do, at -the post of danger in the gate of Benjamin; for Zedekiah was not a -physical, though he was a moral, coward. Ebed-Melech told the king -that Jeremiah was dying of starvation, and Zedekiah bade him take -three[865] men with him and rescue the dying man. The faithful -Ethiopian hurried to a cellar under the treasury, took with him some -old, worn fragments of robes, and, letting them down by cords, called -to Jeremiah to put them under his arm-pits. He did so, and they drew -him up into the light of day, though he still remained in prison. - -It seems to have been at this time that, in spite of his grim -vaticination of immediate retribution, Jeremiah showed his serene -confidence in the ultimate future by accepting the proposal of his -cousin Hanameel to buy some of the paternal fields at Anathoth, though -at that very moment they were in the hands of the Chaldæans. Such an -act publicly performed must have caused some consolation to the -besieged, just as did the courage of the Roman senator who gave a good -price for the estate outside the walls of Rome on which Hannibal was -actually encamped. - -Then Zedekiah once more secretly sent for him, and implored him to tell -the unvarnished truth. "If I do," said the prophet, "will you not kill -me? and will you in any case hearken to me?" Zedekiah swore not to -betray him to his enemies; and Jeremiah told him that, even at that -eleventh hour, if he would go out and make submission to the -Babylonians, the city should not be burnt, and he should save the lives -of himself and of his family. Zedekiah believed him, but pleaded that he -was afraid of the mockery of the deserters to whom he might be -delivered. Jeremiah assured him that he should not be so delivered, and -that, if he refused to obey, nothing remained for the city, and for him -and his wives and children, but final ruin. The king was too weak to -follow what he must now have felt to be the last chance which God had -opened out for him. He could only "attain to half-believe." He entrusted -the result to chance, with miserable vacillation of purpose; and the -door of hope was closed upon him. His one desire was to conceal the -interview; and if it came to the ears of the princes--of whom he was -shamefully afraid--he begged Jeremiah to say that he had only entreated -the king not to send him back to die in Jonathan's prison. - -As he had suspected, it became known that Jeremiah had been summoned -to an interview with the king. They questioned the prophet in prison. -He told them the story which the king had suggested to him, and the -truth remained undiscovered. For this deflection from exact truth it -is tolerably certain that, in the state of men's consciences upon the -subject of veracity in those days, the prophet's moral sense did not -for a moment reproach him. He remained in his prison, guarded probably -by the faithful Ebed-Melech, until Jerusalem was taken. - -Let us pity the dreadful plight of Zedekiah, aggravated as it was by -his weak temperament. "He stands at the head of a people determined to -defend itself, but is himself without either hope or courage."[866] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[852] Homer, _Iliad_, i. 106-109. - -[853] But it must not be forgotten that Jer. xxxi. 1-34 is so hopeful -that it has been called "the Gospel before Christ." - -[854] Jer. vi. 14, viii. 11; Ezek. xiii. 10. - -[855] W. R. Smith, "Prophets" (_Enc. Brit._). - -[856] Jer. xxxvii, 11-15. - -[857] Jer xxxviii. 5. The Jewish aristocracy consisted, says Grätz, of -three classes: the _benî hammelech_, or "king's sons"--_i.e._, princes -of the blood-royal; the _roshî aboth_, "heads of the fathers," or -_zekenîm_, "elders"; and the _abhodî hammelech_, "king's servants," or -"courtiers" (ii. 446). - -[858] Lam. v. 4. - -[859] Jer. xxxvii. 21, xxxviii. 9, lii. 6. - -[860] Lam. iv. 7, 8. - -[861] Lam. iv. 10, ii. 20; Ezek. v. 10; Baruch ii. 3. - -[862] Lam. iv. 5. See Stanley, _Lectures_, ii. 470. - -[863] Ezek. xi. 22. - -[864] This may possibly be alluded to in Psalm lxix. 2. - -[865] Jer. xxxviii. 10, A.V., "thirty." - -[866] Van Oort, iv. 52. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXVIII - - _THE FALL OF JERUSALEM_ - - B.C. 586 - - 2 KINGS xxv. 1-21 - - "In that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all - nations."--ZECH. xii. 3. - - "An end is come, the end is come; it awaketh against thee: behold - the end is come."--EZEK. vii. 6. - - "Behold yon sterile spot - Where now the wandering Arab's tent - Flaps in the desert blast; - There once old Salem's haughty fane - Reared high to heaven its thousand golden domes, - And in the blushing face of day - Exposed its shameful glory." - SHELLEY. - - -After the siege had lasted for a year and a half, all but one day, at -midnight the besiegers made a breach in the northern city wall.[867] -It was a day of terrible remembrance, and throughout the exile it was -observed as a solemn fast.[868] - -Nebuchadrezzar was no longer in person before the walls. He had other -war-like operations and other sieges on hand--the sieges of Tyre, -Asekah, and Lachish--as well as Jerusalem. He had therefore -established his headquarters at Lachish, and did not superintend the -final operations against the city.[869] But now that all had become -practically hopeless, and the capture of the rest of Jerusalem was -only a matter of a few days more, Zedekiah and his few best surviving -princes and soldiers fled by night through the opposite quarter of the -city. There was a little unwatched postern between two walls near the -king's garden, and through this he and his escort fled, hoping to -reach the Arabah, and make good his escape, perhaps to the -Wady-el-Arish, which he could reach in five hours, through the wilds -beyond the Jordan.[870] The heads of the king and his followers were -muffled, and they carried on their shoulders their choicest -possessions.[871] But he was betrayed by some of the mean -deserters,[872] and pursued by the Chaldæans. His movements were -doubtless impeded by the presence of his harem and his children. His -little band of warriors could offer no resistance, and fled in all -directions. Zedekiah, his family, and attendants were taken prisoners, -and carried to Riblah to appear before the mighty conqueror.[873] -Nebuchadrezzar showed no pity towards one whom he had elevated to the -throne, and who had violated his most solemn assurances by intriguing -with his enemies. He brought him to trial, and doomed him to witness -with his own eyes the massacre of his two sons and of his attendants. -After he had endured this anguish, worse than death, his eyes were put -out, and, bound in double fetters,[874] he was sent to Babylon, where -he ended his miserable days. To blind a king deprived him of all hope -of recovering the throne, and was therefore in ancient days a common -punishment.[875] The LXX. adds that he was sent by the Babylonians to -grind a mill--εἰς οἰκίον μυλῶνος. This is probably a reminiscence of -the blinded Samson. But thus were fulfilled with startling literalness -two prophecies which might well have seemed to be contradictory.[876] -For Jeremiah had said (xxxiv. 3),-- - -"Thine eyes shall behold the eyes of the King of Babylon, and he shall -speak with thee mouth to mouth, and thou shalt go to Babylon." - -Whereas Ezekiel had said (xii. 13),-- - -"I will bring him to Babylon, the land of the Chaldæans; yet shall he -not see it, though he shall die there." - -Henceforth Zedekiah was forgotten, and his place knew him no more. We -can only hope that in his blindness and solitude he was happier than -he had been on the throne of Judah, and that before death came to end -his miseries he found peace with God. - -The conqueror did not come to spoil the city. He left that task to three -great officers,--Nebuzaradan, the captain of the guard, or chief -executioner;[877] Nebushasban, the Rabsaris, or chief of the eunuchs; -and Nergalshareser, the Rabmag, or chief of the magicians. They took -their station by the Middle Gate, and first gave up the city to pillage -and massacre. No horror was spared.[878] The sepulchres were rifled for -treasure; the young Levites were slain in the house of their Sanctuary; -women were violated; maidens and hoary-headed men were slain. "Princes -were hanged up by the hand, and the faces of elders were dishonoured; -priest and prophet were slain in the Sanctuary of the Lord,"[879] till -the blood flowed like red wine from the winepress over the desecrated -floor.[880] The guilty city drank at the hand of God the dregs of the -cup of His fury.[881] It was the final vengeance. "The punishment of -thine iniquity is accomplished, O daughter of Zion. He will no more -carry thee away into captivity."[882] And, meanwhile, the little Bedouin -principalities were full of savage exultation at the fate of their -hereditary foe.[883] This was felt by the Jews as a culmination of their -misery, that they became a derision to their enemies. The callous -insults hurled at them by the neighbouring tribes in their hour of shame -awoke that implacable wrath against Gebal and Ammon and Amalek which -finds its echo in the Prophets and in the Psalms.[884] - -After this the devoted capital was given up to destruction. The Temple -was plundered. All that remained of its often-rifled splendours was -carried away, such as the ancient pillars Jachin and Boaz, the -masterpieces of Hiram's art, the caldron, the brazen sea, and all the -vessels of gold, of silver, and of brass. Then the walls of the city -were dismantled and broken down. The Temple, and the palace, and all the -houses of the princes were committed to the flames. As for the principal -remaining inhabitants, Seraiah the chief priest, perhaps the grandson of -Hilkiah and the grandfather of Ezra, Zephaniah the second priest, the -three Levitic doorkeepers, the secretary of war, five of the greatest -nobles who "saw the king's face,"[885] and sixty of the common people -who had been marked out for special punishment, were taken to Riblah, -and there massacred by order of Nebuchadrezzar.[886] With these -Nebuchadrezzar took away as his prisoners a multitude of the wealthier -inhabitants, leaving behind him but the humblest artisans. As the -craftsmen and smiths had been deported,[887] these poor people busied -themselves in agriculture, as vine-dressers and husbandmen. The existing -estates were divided among them; and being few in number, they found the -amplest sustenance in treasures of wheat and barley, and oil and honey, -and summer fruits, which they kept concealed for safety, as the -fellaheen of Palestine do to this day.[888] - -According to the historic chapters added to the prophecies of -Jeremiah, the whole number of captives carried away from Jerusalem by -Nebuchadrezzar in the seventh, the eighteenth, and the twenty-third -years of his reign were 4,600.[889] The completeness of the desolation -might well have caused the heart-rending outcry of Psalm lxxix.: "O -God, the heathen are come into Thine inheritance; Thy holy Temple have -they defiled; they have made Jerusalem a heap of stones. The dead -bodies of Thy servants have they given to be meat unto the fowls of -heaven, and the flesh of Thy saints unto the beasts of the land. Their -blood have they shed like water round about Jerusalem; and there was -no man to bury them." - -Among the remnant of the people was Jeremiah. Nebuzaradan had received -from his king the strictest injunctions to treat him honourably; for he -had heard from the deserters that he had always opposed the rebellion, -and had prophesied the issue of the siege. He was indeed sent in -manacles to Ramah;[890] but there Nebuchadrezzar gave him free choice to -do exactly as he liked--either to accompany him to Babylon, where he -should be well treated and cared for, or to return to Jerusalem, and -live where he liked. This was his desire. Nebuchadrezzar therefore -dismissed him with food and a present;[891] and he returned. The LXX. -and Vulgate represent him as sitting weeping over the ruins of -Jerusalem, and tradition says that he sought for his lamentations a cave -still existing near the Damascus Gate. Of this Scripture knows nothing. -But the melancholy prophet was only reserved for further tragedies. He -had lived one of the most afflicted of human lives. A man of tender -heart and shrinking disposition, he had been called to set his face like -a flint against kings, and nobles, and mobs. Worse than this, being -himself a prophet and priest, naturally led to sympathise with both, he -was the doomed antagonist of both--victim of "one of the strongest of -human passions, the hatred of priests against a priest who attacks his -own order, the hatred of prophets against a prophet who ventures to have -a voice and a will of his own." Even his own family had plotted against -his life at humble Anathoth;[892] and when he retreated to Jerusalem, he -found himself at the centre of the storm. Now perhaps he hoped for a -gleam of sunset peace. But his hopes were disappointed. He had to tread -the path of anguish and hatred to the bitter end, as he had trodden it -for nearly fifty years of the troubled life which had followed his call -in early boyhood. - -"But, in the case of Jerusalem," says Dean Stanley, "both its first -and second destruction have the peculiar interest of involving the -dissolution of a religious dispensation, combined with the agony of an -expiring nation, such as no other people has survived, and, by -surviving, carried on the living recollection, first of one, and then -of the other, for centuries after the first shock was over."[893] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[867] Jos., _Antt._, X. viii. 2; 2 Chron. xxxii. 5, xxxiii. 14. First -and last, the siege seems to have lasted one year, five months, and -twenty-seven days. - -[868] Zech. viii. 19. - -[869] The inscriptions of Nebuchadrezzar which have been as yet -deciphered speak of his sumptuous buildings and of his worship of the -gods rather than of his conquests. See _Records of the Past_, vii. -69-78. - -[870] Robinson, _Bibl. Res._, ii. 536. Some suppose that "the king's -garden" was near the mouth of the Tyropœon Valley. - -[871] Ezek. xii. 12. Perhaps the gate alluded to is the fountain gate -of Neh. iii. 15. Ezekiel seems to speak of "digging through the wall." -Robinson says that a trace of the outermost wall still exists in the -rude pathway which crosses the mouth of the Tyropœon on a mound hard -by the old mulberry tree which marks the traditional site of Isaiah's -martyrdom. - -[872] Jos., _Antt._, X. viii. 2. - -[873] Traces of his presence are found in inscriptions in the Wady of -the Dog near Beyrout, and in Wady Brissa. See Sayce, _Proceedings of -the Bibl. Arch. Soc._, November 1881. - -[874] 2 Kings xxv. 7. See Layard, _Nineveh_, ii. 376. - -[875] The blinding was sometimes done by passing a red-hot rod of -silver or brass over the open eyes; sometimes by plucking out the eyes -(Jer. lii. 11, Vulg. _oculos eruit_; 2 Kings xxv. 7, _effodit_). See a -hideous illustration of a yet more brutal process in Botta (_Monum. de -Ninève_, Pl. cxviii.), where Sargon with his own hand is thrusting a -lance into the eyes of a captive prince, whose head is kept steady by -a bridle fastened to a hook through his lips. See also Judg. xvi. 21; -Xen., _Anab._, i. 9, § 13; Procopius, _Bel. Pers._, i. 1; Ammianus, -xxvii. 12; Rawlinson, _Ancient Monarchies_, i. 307. - -[876] Jos., _Antt._, X. viii. 2, 3. - -[877] Nebur-zir-iddina, "Nebo bestowed seed." Jer. xxxix. 9, 13, is in -some way corrupt. Ezekiel (ix. 2), however, and Josephus (_Antt._, X. -viii. 2) mention _six_ officers. Nebuzaradan was "chief of the -executioners" (Gen. xxxvii. 36; 1 Kings ii. 25, 35, 46). - -[878] Psalm lxxix. 2, 3. - -[879] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 17; Lam. ii. 21, v. 11, 12. - -[880] To the reminiscences of these scenes are partly due the Talmudic -legend about the blood of Zechariah, the son of Jehoiada, bubbling up -to demand vengeance. Nebudchadrezzar slew a holocaust of human victims -to appease the shade of the wrathful prophet, until the king himself -was terrified, and asked if he wished his whole people to be -slaughtered. Then the blood ceased to bubble. - -[881] See Rawlinson, _Kings of Israel and Judah_, p. 236. - -[882] Lam. iv. 22. - -[883] Psalm lxxix, 1. - -[884] Obad. 14-16; Psalm cxxxvii. 7; 1 Esdras iv. 45. - -[885] Comp. Esther i. 14. - -[886] On these personages see 1 Chron. vi. 13, 14; 2 Kings xxii. 4; -Ezra vii. 1; Jer. xxi. 1, xxxvii. 3, etc. - -[887] Nebuchadrezzar had no doubt needed them for his great buildings -at Babylon, and their deportation would render more difficult any -attempt to refortify Jerusalem. - -[888] Jer. xli. 8, xl. 12. - -[889] Jer. lii. 28-30. In his seventh year, 3,023; in his eighteenth, -832 in his thirty-third, 745 = 4,600. - -[890] Ramah was but five miles from Jerusalem, and at first Jeremiah -may not have been identified (Jer. xl. 1-6). - -[891] The present, if accepted, could only be regarded, under the -circumstances, as part of the necessity of life. It does not fall -under the head of the presents often offered to prophets (1 Sam. ix. -7; 2 Kings iv. 42; Mic. iii. 5, 11; Amos vii. 12). - -[892] Jer. xi. 19-21, xii. 6. - -[893] Stanley, _Lectures_, ii. 515. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXIX - - _GEDALIAH_ - - B.C. 586 - - 2 KINGS xxv. 22-30 - - "Vedi che son un che piango."--DANTE, _Inferno_. - - "No, rather steel thy melting heart - To act the martyr's sternest part, - To watch with firm, unshrinking eye - Thy darling visions as they die, - Till all bright hopes and hues of day - Have faded into twilight grey." - KEBLE. - - -In deciding that he would not accompany Nebuchadrezzar to Babylon, -Jeremiah made the choice of duty. In Chaldæa he would have lived at -ease, in plenty, in security, amid universal respect. He might have -helped his younger contemporary Ezekiel in his struggle to keep the -exiles in Babylon faithful to their duty and their God. He regarded the -exiles as representing all that was best and noblest in the nation; and -he would have been safe and honoured in the midst of them, under the -immediate protection of the great Babylonian king. On the other hand, to -return to Judæa was to return to a defenceless and a distracted people, -the mere dregs of the true nation, the mere phantom of what they once -had been. Surely his life had earned the blessing of repose? But no! The -hopes of the Chosen People, the seed of Abraham, God's servant, could -not be dissevered from the Holy Land. Rest was not for him on this side -of the grave. His only prayer must be, like that which Senancour had -inscribed over his grave, "Éternité, deviens mon asile!" The decision -cost him a terrible struggle; but duty called him, and he obeyed. It has -been supposed by some critics[894] that the wild cry of Jer. xv. 10-21 -expresses his anguish at the necessity of casting in his lot with the -remnant; the sense that they needed his protecting influence and -prophetic guidance; and the promise of God that his sacrifice should not -be ineffectual for good to the miserable fragment of his nation, even -though they should continue to struggle against him. - -So with breaking heart he saw Nebuzaradan at Ramah marshalling the -throng of captives for their long journey to the waters of Babylon. -Before them, and before the little band which returned with him to the -burnt Temple, the dismantled city, the desolate house, there lay an -unknown future; but in spite of the exiles' doom it looked brighter -for them than for him, as with tears and sobs they parted from each -other. Then it was that-- - -"A voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, and bitter weeping; Rachel -weeping for her children refuseth to be comforted, because they are -not. Thus saith the Lord, 'Refrain thy voice from weeping, and thine -eyes from tears: for thy work shall be rewarded,' saith the Lord; 'and -they shall come again from the land of the enemy. And there is hope -for thy time to come,' saith the Lord, 'that thy children shall come -again to their own border.'"[895] - -Disappointed in the fidelity of the royal house of Judah, Nebuchadrezzar -had not attempted to place another of them on the throne. He appointed -Gedaliah, the son of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan, his satrap (_pakîd_) -over the poor remnant who were left in the land. In this appointment we -probably trace the influence of Jeremiah. There is no one whom -Nebuchadrezzar would have been so likely to consult. Gedaliah was the -son of the prophet's old protector,[896] and his grandfather Shaphan had -been a trusted minister of Josiah. He thoroughly justified the -confidence reposed in him, and under his wise and prosperous rule there -seemed to be every prospect that there would be at least some pale gleam -of returning prosperity. The Jews, who during the period of the siege -had fled into all the neighbouring countries, no sooner heard of his -viceroyalty than they came flocking back from Moab, and Ammon, and Edom. -They found themselves, perhaps for the first time in their lives, in -possession of large estates, from which the exiles of Babylon had been -dispossessed; and favoured by an abundant harvest, "they gathered wine -and summer fruits very much."[897] - -Jerusalem--dismantled, defenceless, burnt--was no longer habitable. It -was all but deserted, so that jackals and hyænas prowled even over the -mountain of the Lord's House. All attempt to refortify it would have -been regarded as rebellion, and such a mere "lodge in a garden of -cucumbers" would have been useless to repress the marauding incursions -of the envious Moabites and Edomites, who had looked on with shouts at -the destruction of the city, and exulted when her carved work was -broken down with axes and hammers. Gedaliah therefore fixed his -headquarters at Mizpah, about six miles north of Jerusalem, of which -the lofty eminence could be easily secured.[898] It was the watchtower -from which Titus caught his first glimpses of the Holy City, as many a -traveller does to this day, and the point at which Richard I. averted -his eyes with tears, saying that he was unworthy to look upon the city -which he was unable to save. Here, then, Gedaliah lived, urging upon -his subjects the policy which his friend and adviser Jeremiah had -always supported, and promising them quietness and peace if they would -but accept the logic of circumstances--if they would bow to the -inevitable, and frankly acknowledge the suzerainty of Nebuchadrezzar. -It was perhaps as a pledge of more independence in better days to come -that Nebuzaradan had left Gedaliah in charge of the young daughters of -King Zedekiah, who had with them some of their eunuch-attendants. As -that unfortunate monarch was only thirty-two years old when he was -blinded and carried away, the princesses were probably young girls; -and it has been conjectured that it was part of the Chaldæan king's -plan for the future that in time Gedaliah should be permitted to marry -one of them, and re-establish at least a collateral branch of the old -royal house of David. - -How long this respite continued we do not know. The language of -Jeremiah xxxix 2, xli. 1, compared with 2 Kings xxv. 8, might seem to -imply that it only lasted two months. But since Jeremiah does not -mention the year in xli. 1, and as there seems to have been yet -another deportation of Jews by Nebuchadrezzar five years latter (Jer. -lii. 30), which may have been in revenge for the murder of his satrap, -some have supposed that Gedaliah's rule lasted four years. All is -uncertain, and the latter passage is of doubtful authenticity; but it -is at least possible that the vengeful atrocity committed by Ishmael -followed almost immediately after the Chaldæan forces were well out of -sight. Respecting these last days of Jewish independence, "History, -leaning semisomnous on her pyramid, muttereth something, but we know -not what it is." - -However this may be, there seem to have been guerilla bands wandering -through the country, partly to get what they could, and partly to -watch against Bedouin marauders. Johanan, the son of Kareah, who was -one of the chief captains among them,[899] came with others to -Gedaliah, and warned him that Baalis, King of Ammon, was intriguing -against him, and trying to induce a certain Ishmael, the son of -Nethaniah, the son of Elishama--who, in some way unknown to us, -represented, perhaps on the female side, the seed royal[900]--to come -and murder him. Gedaliah was of a fine, unsuspicious temperament, and -with rash generosity he refused to believe in the existence of a plot -so ruinous and so useless. Astonished at his noble incredulity, -Johanan then had a secret interview with him, and offered to murder -Ishmael so secretly that no one should know of it. "Why," he asked, -"should this man be suffered to ruin everything, and cause the final -scattering of even the struggling handful of colonists at Mizpah and -in Judah?" Gedaliah forbad his intervention. "Thou shalt not do this," -he said: "thou speakest falsely of Ishmael." - -But Johanan's story was only too true. Shortly afterwards, Ishmael, -with ten confederates,[901] came to visit Gedaliah at Mizpah, perhaps -on the pretext of seeing his kinswomen, the daughters of Zedekiah. -Gedaliah welcomed this ambitious villain and his murderous accomplices -with open-handed hospitality. He invited them all to a banquet in the -fort of Mizpah; and after eating salt with him, Ishmael and his -bravoes first murdered him, and then put promiscuously to the sword -his soldiers, and the Chaldæans who had been left to look after -him.[902] The gates of the fort were closed, and the bodies were flung -into a deep well or tank,[903] which had been constructed by Asa in -the middle of the courtyard, when he was fortifying Mizpah against the -attacks of Baasha, King of Israel. - -For two days there was an unbroken silence, and the peasants at Mizpah -remained unaware of the dreadful tragedy. On the third day a sad -procession was seen wending its way up the heights. There were scattered -Jews in Shiloh and Samaria who still remembered Zion; and eighty -pilgrims, weeping as they went, came with shaven beards and rent -garments to bring a _minchah_ and incense to the ruined shrine at -Jerusalem. In the depth of their woe they had even violated a law (Lev. -xix. 28, xxi. 5), of which they were perhaps unaware, by cutting -themselves in sign of their misery. Mizpah would be their last -halting-place on the way to Jerusalem; and the hypocrite Ishmael came -out to them with an invitation to share the hospitality of the murdered -satrap. No sooner had the gate of the charnel-house closed upon -them,[904] than Ishmael and his ten ruffians began to murder this -unoffending company. Crimes more aimless and more brutal than those -committed by this infinitely degenerate scion of the royal house it is -impossible to conceive. The place swam with blood. The story "reads -almost like a page from the annals of the Indian Mutiny." Seventy of the -wretched pilgrims had been butchered and flung into the tank, which must -have been choked with corpses, like the fatal well at Cawnpore,[905] -when the ten survivors pleaded for their lives by telling Ishmael that -they had large treasures of country produce stored in hidden places, -which should be at his disposal if he would spare them.[906] - -As it was useless to make any further attempt to conceal his -atrocities, Ishmael now took the young princesses and the inhabitants -of Mizpah with him, and tried to make good his escape to his patron -the King of Ammon. But the watchful eye of Johanan, the son of Kareah, -had been upon him, and assembling his band he went in swift pursuit. -Ishmael had got no farther than the Pool of Gibeon, when Johanan -overtook him, to the intense joy of the prisoners. A scuffle ensued; -but Ishmael and eight of his blood-stained desperadoes unhappily -managed to make good their escape to the Ammonites. The wretch -vanishes into the darkness, and we hear of him no more. - -Even now the circumstances were desperate. Nebuchadrezzar could not in -honour overlook the frustration of all his plans, and the murder, not -only of his viceroy, but even of his Chaldæan commissioners. He would -not be likely to accept any excuses. No course seemed open but that of -flight. There was no temptation to return to Mizpah with its frightful -memories and its corpse-choked tank. From Gibeon the survivors made -their way to Bethlehem, which lay on the road to Egypt, and where they -could be sheltered in the caravanserai of Chimham. Many Jews had -already taken refuge in Egypt. Colonies of them were living in -Pathros, and at Migdol and Noph, under the kindly protection of -Pharaoh Hophrah. Would it not be well to join them? - -In utter perplexity Johanan and the other captains and all the people -came to Jeremiah. How he had escaped the massacre at Mizpah we do not -know; but now he seemed to be the only man left in whose prophetic -guidance they could confide. They entreated him with pathetic -earnestness to show them the will of Jehovah; and he promised to pray -for insight, while they pledged themselves to obey implicitly his -directions. - -The anguish and vacillation of the prophet's mind is shown by the fact -that for ten whole days no light came to him. It seemed as if Judah -was under an irrevocable curse. Whither could they return? What -temptation was there to return? Did not return mean fresh intolerable -miseries? Would they not be torn to pieces by the robber bands from -across the Jordan? And what could be the end of it but another -deportation to Babylon, with perhaps further massacre and starvation? - -All the arguments seemed against this course; and he could see very -clearly that it would be against all the wishes of the down-trodden -fugitives who longed for Egypt, "where we shall see no war, nor hear -the sound of the trumpet, nor have hunger of bread." - -Yet Jeremiah could only give them the message which he believed to -represent the will of God. He bade them return. He assured them that -they need have no fear of the King of Babylon, and that God would -bless them; whereas if they went to Egypt, they would die by the -sword, the famine, and the pestilence. At the same time--doomed always -to thwart the hopes of the multitude--he reproved the hypocrisy which -had sent them to ask God's will when they never intended to do -anything but follow their own. - -Then their anger broke out against him. He was, as always, the prophet -of evil, and they held him more than half responsible for being the -_cause_ of the ruin which he invariably predicted. Johanan and "all -the proud men" (_zēdim_) gave him the lie. They told him that the -source of his prophesy was not Jehovah, but the meddling and -pernicious Baruch. Perhaps some of them may have remembered the words -of Isaiah, that a day should come when five cities, of which one -should be called Kir-Cheres ("the City of Destruction")--a play on the -name Kir-Heres, "the City of the Sun," On or Heliopolis should--speak -the language of Canaan and swear by the Lord of hosts, and there -should be an altar in the land of Egypt and a _matstsebah_ at its -border in witness to Jehovah, and that though Egypt should be smitten -she should also be healed.[907] - -So they settled to go to Egypt; and taking with them Jeremiah, and -Baruch, and the king's daughters, and all the remnant, they made their -way to Tahpanhes or Daphne,[908] an advanced post to guard the road to -Syria. Mr. Flinders Petrie in 1886 discovered the site of the city at -Tel Defenneh, and the ruins of the very palace which Pharaoh Hophrah -placed at the disposal of the daughters of his ally Zedekiah. It is -still known by the name of "The Castle of the Jew's Daughters"--_El -Kasr el Bint el Jehudi_.[909] - -In front of this palace was an elevated platform (_mastaba_) of brick, -which still remains. In this brickwork Jeremiah was bidden by the word -of Jehovah to place great stones, and to declare that on that very -platform, over those very stones, Nebuchadrezzar should pitch his -royal tent, when he came to wrap himself in the land of Egypt, as a -shepherd wraps himself in his garment, and to burn the pillars of -Heliopolis with fire.[910] - -Jeremiah still had to face stormy times. At some great festival -assembly at Tahpanhes he bitterly reproached the exiled Jews for their -idolatries. He was extremely indignant with the women who burned -incense to the Queen of Heaven. The multitude, and especially the -women, openly defied him. "We will not hearken to thee," they said. -"We will continue to burn incense, and offer offerings to the Queen of -Heaven, _as we have done, we, and our fathers, our kings, and our -princes, in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem_; for -then had we plenty of victuals, and were well, and saw no evil. It is -only since we have left off making cakes for her and honouring her -that we have suffered hunger and desolation; and our husbands were -always well aware of our proceedings." - -Never was there a more defiantly ostentatious revolt against God and -against His prophet! Remonstrance seemed hopeless. What could Jeremiah -do but menace them with the wrath of Heaven, and tell them that in -sign of the truth of his words the fate of Pharaoh Hophrah should be -the same as the fate of Zedekiah, King of Judah, and should be -inflicted by the hand of Nebuchadrezzar.[911] - -So on the colony of fugitives the curtain of revelation rushes down in -storm. The prophet went on the troubled path which, if tradition be -true, led him at last to martyrdom. He is said to have been stoned by -his infuriated fellow-exiles. But his name lived in the memory of his -people. It was he (they believed) who had hidden from the Chaldæans -the Ark and the sacred fire, and some day he should return to reveal -the place of their concealment.[912] When Christ asked His disciples -six hundred years later, "Whom say the people that I am?" one of the -answers was, "Some say Jeremiah or one of the prophets." He became, so -to speak, the guardian saint of the land in which he had suffered such -cruel persecutions. - -But the historian of the Kings does not like to leave the close of his -story in unbroken gloom. He wrote during the Exile. He has narrated -with tears the sad fate of Jehoiachin; and though he does not care to -dwell on the Exile itself, he is glad to narrate one touch of kindness -on the part of the King of Babylon, which he doubtless regarded as a -pledge of mercies yet to come. Twenty-six years had elapsed since the -capture of Jerusalem, and thirty-seven since the captivity of the -exiled king, when Evil-Merodach, the son and successor of -Nebuchadrezzar, took pity on the imprisoned heir of the House of -David.[913] He took Jehoiachin from his dungeon, changed his garments, -spoke words of encouragement to him, gave him a place at his own -table,[914] assigned to him a regular allowance from his own -banquet,[915] and set his throne above the throne of all the other -captive kings who were with him in Babylon. It might seem a trivial -act of mercy, yet the Jews remembered in their records the very day of -the month on which it had taken place, because they regarded it as a -break in the clouds which overshadowed them--as "the first gleam of -heaven's amber in the Eastern grey." - -FOOTNOTES: - -[894] So Grätz and Cheyne. - -[895] Jer. xxxi. 15-17. - -[896] Jer. xxvi. 24. - -[897] Jer. xl. 12. - -[898] Some identify it with _Shaphat_, a mile from Jerusalem. - -[899] They are called _sarî_ ("princes"). - -[900] There is no Elishama in the royal genealogy, except a son of -David. Ishmael may have been the son or grandson of some Ammonite -princess. An Elishama was scribe of Jehoiakim (Jer. xxxvi. 12). - -[901] The Hebrew text calls these ten ruffians _rabbî hammelech_, -"chief officers of the king" of Ammon. - -[902] Josephus records or conjectures that the governor was -overpowered by wine, and had sunk into slumber (_Antt._, X. ix. 2). - -[903] In Jer. xli. 9, for "because of Gedaliah," the better reading is -"was a great pit" (LXX., φρέαρ μέγα). - -[904] Ishmael--a marvel of craft and villainy--put into practice the -same stratagem which on a larger scale was employed by Mohammed Ali in -his massacre of the Mamelukes at Cairo in 1806 (Grove, _s.v._ _Bibl. -Dict._). For "the midst of the city" (Jer. xli. 7), we ought to read -"courtyard," as in Josephus. - -[905] Comp. Jehu's treatment of the family of Ahaziah (2 Kings x. 14). - -[906] The dark deed is still commemorated by a Jewish fast, as in the -days of Zechariah (Zech. vii. 3-5, viii. 19). - -[907] Isa. xix. 18-22. - -[908] Jer. ii. 16, xliv. 1; Ezek. xxx. 18; Jer. xliii. 7, xlvi. 14; -Herod., ii. 30. - -[909] Fl. Petrie, _Memoir on Tanis_ (Egypt. Explor. Fund, 4th memoir), -1888. - -[910] Jer. xliii. 13, Beth-shemesh. Only one pillar of the Temple of -the Sun is now standing. It is said to be four thousand years old. It -is certain that Nebuchadrezzar invaded Egypt and defeated Amasis, the -son of Hophrah, B.C. 565, reducing Egypt to "the basest of kingdoms" -(Ezek. xxix. 14, 15). Three of Nebuchadrezzar's terra-cotta cylinders -have been found at Tahpanhes. - -[911] How far the prophecy was fulfilled we do not know. Assyrian and -Egyptian fragments of record show that in the thirty-seventh year of -his reign Nebuchadrezzar invaded Egypt and advanced to Syene (Ezek. -xxix. 10). - -[912] 2 Macc. ii. 1-8; comp. xv. 13-16. The tradition is singular when -we recall the small store which Jeremiah set by the Ark (Jer. iii. 16). - -[913] Evil-Merodach (Avil-Marduk, "Man of Merodach") only reigned two -years, and was then murdered by his brother-in-law Neriglissar -(Berosus _ap._ Jos.: comp. _Ap._, i. 20). The Rabbis have a -story--perhaps founded on that of Gaius and Agrippa I.--that -Evil-Merodach had been imprisoned by his father for wishing his death, -and in prison formed a friendship for Jehoiachin. - -[914] "Lifted up his head." Comp. Gen. xl. 13, 20. - -[915] To be thus ὁμοτράπεζος, or σύσσιτος, of the king was a high honour -(Herod., iii. 13, v. 24. Comp. Judg. i. 7; 2 Sam. ix. 13, etc.). - - - - - EPILOGUE - - "On Jordan's banks the Arab's camels stray, - On Zion's hills the False One's votaries pray, - The Baal-adorer bows on Sinai's steep; - Yet there--e'en there--O God, Thy thunders sleep." - BYRON. - - "God, Thou art Love: I build my faith on that." - BROWNING. - - -Before concluding I should like to add a few words (1) on what some may -regard as the too favourable attitude towards what is called the "Higher -Criticism" adopted in this book; and (2) on the deep, essential, eternal -lessons which we have found in chapter after chapter of it. - -1. As regards the first, I need only say that the one thing I seek, -the sole thing I care for, is Truth,--truth, not tradition. Even St. -Cyprian, devoted as he was to custom and tradition, warns us that -"Custom without Truth is only antiquated error," and that what we -believe must be established by reason, not prescribed by tradition. - -And it cannot be laid down too clearly that the old view of -Inspiration--which defined it as consisting in verbal dictation, which -made the sacred writers "not only the penmen but the pens of the Holy -Spirit," and which spoke of every sentence, word, syllable, and every -letter of Scripture as Divine and infallible--was a dangerous and -absolute falsity, and that any attempt in these days to enforce it as -binding on the intellect and conscience of mankind could only lead to -the utter shipwreck of all sincere and reasonable religion. "Not -needlessly," says the learned author of _Italy and her -Invaders_--himself an able opponent of many modern conclusions on the -subject--"should I wish to shake even that faith which practically -believes that the whole Bible, exactly in its present shape, yes, almost -the English Bible just as we have it, came straight down from heaven. -But we do want to get away from all mere theories as to the way in which -God _might_ have revealed Himself, and to learn as much as we can of the -way in which He _has_ revealed Himself in actual fact, and in real human -lives."[916] - -To do this has been one of my objects in this volume, and in the -preceding volume on the First Book of Kings. - -2. We have now only to cast one last glance on this book, and on the -lessons which it is meant to teach. - -Consider, first, its deep and varied interest. It has the combined -value of History and of Biography; and, in dealing with both, its aim -is to pass over all minor and earthly details, and to show the method -of God's dealings both with nations and with the individual soul. - -If we look at the book only as a History, it shows us in the briefest -possible compass a series of national events of the greatest -importance in the annals of mankind. We become witnesses of the fierce -occasional struggles between Israel and Judah, and of the constant -warfare of both with those wild surrounding nations--the people of -Moab, and of Edom, Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek, the Philistines also, -and them that dwell at Tyre. We watch the indomitable resistance of -Tyre to Assyria and Babylon. We see the Northern Kingdom of Israel -rise into wealth, power, and luxury, only to sink into deep moral -corruption, until, at last, the patience of God is exhausted, and He -obliterates its very existence in an apparently final and irremediable -overthrow. We witness the rise, culmination, and fall of Syria; the -culmination and the crashing overthrow of Nineveh; the rise and the -splendour of Babylon. We see the surging tide of the nomad Scythians -and Cimmerians rise into flood and ebb away with spent and shallow -waves. We see the petty fortress of Zion triumph in its defiance of -the mighty hosts of Sennacherib because it is strong in reliance upon -God, and we see it grow faithless to God until it succumbs to the -captains of Nebuchadrezzar. Again and again we observe that the -Almighty stills the raging of the sea, the noise of his waves, and the -madness of the people. - -The conviction is borne upon our soul with overwhelming power, as we -read the pages of Amos, of Isaiah, and of Jeremiah, that, in spite of -all their rage and tumult, and apparently irresistible dominance, God -still sitteth above the water-floods, and God remaineth a King for ever. - -Side by side with this spectacle of the dealing of God with nations, in -which we see written in large letters, in characters of blood and of -fire, His dealing with guilty nations, we have abundantly in these -chapters the narrower yet more intense interest which arises from the -contemplation of human nature--one and the same in its general elements, -but infinitely varied in its conditions--in the lives of individual men. -It is revealed to us as in a picture--it is brought home to us, not by -didactic inferences, but with the silent conviction which springs from -the evidence of facts--that wealth is nothing, and rank nothing, and -power nothing, but that the only thing of essential importance in human -lives is whether a man does that which is good or that which is evil in -the sight of the Lord. Good and bad kings pass before us; and though the -best kings, like Hezekiah and Josiah, were no more free from earthly -misfortune than are any of the saints of God--though Hezekiah had to -suffer anguish and humiliation, and Josiah died in defeat on the -battle-field,--yet we are irresistibly led to the belief: "Say ye of the -righteous that it shall be well with him; for they shall eat the fruit -of their doings. Woe unto the wicked! It shall be ill with him; for the -work of his hands shall be done to him." - -We all have a guide in life. "We are not left to steer our course even -by the stars, which the clouds of earth may dim. The ship has something -on board which points towards the spiritual pole of the universe. I will -not venture to call it an _infallible_ guide. It wavers with tremulous -sensitiveness; it may be deflected by disturbing influences; but still -in the main it points with mysterious fidelity towards the pole of our -spirits, even God. And what is this compass which we have for our -guidance? Some would call it Conscience; but we call it by a holier -name, and say that even as the needle is acted on by the magnetic -current, so our spiritual compass is the spirit of man acted on by the -Spirit of the living and infinite God." The lesson of this book--of -every book of biography or of history--is that men are noble and useful -in proportion as they are true to that law of an enlightened conscience -which represents to them the will and the voice of God. - -Ahaziah and Jehoram of Judah, tainted with the blood of Jezebel, and -perverted by the example of Ahab, live wretchedly, reign contemptibly, -and perish miserably; while good Jehoshaphat and pious Josiah are -richly blessed. In the vaunting elation of Amaziah, in the -blood-stained ferocity of Jehu, in the ruthless examples of usurpation -and murder set by king after king in Israel, and in the consequences -which befell them, we see that "fruit is seed." Shallum, Menahem, -Pekah, Athaliah, have to pay a terrible price for brief spells of -troubled royalty; and the slow corruption and disintegration of the -people reflects the vile example of their rulers. Like king, like -people; like people, like priest. We look on at a succession of -thrilling scenes--the horrors of beleaguered cities, the raptures of -unexpected deliverance, the insulting vanities of triumph; we hear the -wail that rises from long lines of fettered captives as they turn -their backs weeping upon their native land. And we are told "strange -stories of the deaths of kings." We see the King of Moab sacrificing -his eldest son to Chemosh upon the wall of Kir-Haraseth in the sight -of three invading hosts. We shudder to think of Ahaz and Manasseh -passing their children through the fire before the grim bull-headed -monster in the valley of the children of Hinnom. We see the two -ghastly piles of the heads of young princes on either side the gates -of Jezreel. We see Jehu driving his fierce chariot over the body of -the painted Tyrian Queen. We catch a glimpse of the sackcloth under -the purple of the King of Israel as he rends his clothes at the -horrible cry of mothers who have devoured their babes. We see the -child Joash standing with the high priest in the Temple amid the blast -of trumpets, while the alien murderess is pushed out and hewn to the -ground. We see Manasseh dragged with hooks to Babylon. We watch the -haggard face of the miserable Zedekiah as his sons are slaughtered -before the eyes which thenceforth are blinded for evermore. We burn -with indignation to see the villain Ishmael close with corpses the -well of Mizpah. But even when the phantasmagoria seems most appalling -and most bloody, we watch the Day-star from on high begin to shed its -glory over the grey east. In due time that Day-star was to rise in -men's hearts and on the world, with healing in His wings; and we feel -that somehow, beyond the smoke and stir of earth's anguish, - - "God's in His heaven, - All's right with the world." - -And like a Greek chorus amid the agonies of destiny stand the -prophets, those clearest and greatest of moral teachers. They, in -spite of their holiness and faithfulness, are not exempt from the -calamities of life. Amos was insulted and expelled by the high priest -of Bethel; Urijah was martyred; Hosea's prophecy is one long and -almost unbroken wail; Isaiah was mocked and slandered by the priests -of Jerusalem, and, if the tradition be true, sawn asunder; Micah, -though spared, prophesied under imminent peril; Jeremiah, saddest of -mankind, type of the suffering servant of Jehovah, was smitten in the -face by the priest Pashur, thrust into the stocks for the general -derision, flung into a deathful prison, let down into a miry well, -hurried into exile, defied, denounced, insulted, at last in all -probability martyred. Prophets in general were hated and disbelieved. -They were the eternal antagonists of priests and mobs. With priests -they had so little affinity, that when a prophet was born a priest, -like Jeremiah and Ezekiel, he might count on the undying hatred and -antagonism of his order. Priests, with scarcely an exception, under -every erring or apostatising king, from Rehoboam to Ahaz, from Ahaz to -Zedekiah, with a monotony of meanness, did nothing but acquiesce, -careful mainly for their own rights and revenues; prophets did little -but raise, against them and their party, an unavailing protest. When, -in the days of the priest-regent Jehoiada, the priests had power, he -had made a special ordinance that there should be overseers in the -Temple whose function it should be to put in the stocks and the collar -"every man that is mad, and that maketh himself a prophet";[917] and -Shemaiah was quite indignant that there should be any delay in putting -this convenient ordinance into force. Priests were chiefly absorbed in -functions and futilities in the exact spirit of their guilty -successors in the days of Christ. There could be little sympathy -between them and the inspired messengers who spoke of such reliance on -observances with almost passionate scorn, and to whom religion meant -righteousness towards men and faith in the Living God. - -This high lesson of Prophecy came into greater prominence with each -succeeding generation. It had been taught by Amos, the first of the -literary prophets, with emphatic distinctness. It was summarised by -Hosea in words which our Saviour loved to quote: "Go ye and learn what -that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice." It had been -uttered by Micah in an outburst of splendid poetry which summed up all -that God requires. It was reiterated in many forms by Isaiah and by -Jeremiah in words of richer moral value than all that came from the -teaching of the priestly functionaries from the days when Aaron -seduced Israel with his golden calf till the days when Caiaphas and -Annas goaded the multitude to prefer Barabbas to Jesus, and to shout -of their Messiah, "Let Him be crucified." - -It was the richest fruit which sprang from the long Divine discipline of -the nation,--the knowledge that outward things are of no avail to save -any man; that God requires righteousness, that God looketh at the heart. - -And the prophets themselves had to learn by the irony of events that -no suppression of local sanctuaries under Hezekiah, no multiplication -of ceremonies and acceptance of Deuteronomic Codes under Josiah, were -deep enough to change men's hearts. Isaiah, like Amos, dwells with -anger on the reliance upon vain ritual, which is so cheap a substitute -for genuine holiness; and Jeremiah, despairing utterly of that -reformation under Josiah of which he had once felt hopeful, had to -denounce the new reliance on the Temple and its sacrifices. He -ultimately felt no confidence in anything except in a new covenant in -which God Himself would write His law upon men's hearts, and all -should know Him from the least even to the greatest. - -But the History of Prophecy also in this epoch is marked by events of -world-wide importance. In the days of Isaiah we see the change of -Israel from a nation into a church of the faithful, for which alone he -has any permanent hope. In him, too, we hear the first distinct -utterances of the final form in which should be fulfilled the -Messianic hope. Under Jeremiah there was still further advance. He -points, as Joel does, to the epoch of the gift of the Holy Spirit, and -shows that God does not only deal with men as nations, or as churches, -or even as families, but as beings with individual souls. - -This and much besides we have seen in the foregoing pages, in which we -have endeavoured to point the lessons of the Books of Kings. The one -main lesson which the narrative is meant to teach is absolute faith -and trust in God, as an anchor which holds amid the wildest storms of -ruin, and of apparently final failure. Not until we have realised that -truth can we hear the words of God, or see the vision of the Almighty. -When we have learnt it, we shall not fear, though the hills be moved -and carried into the midst of the sea. It is the lesson which gets -behind the meaning of failure, and raises us to a height from which we -can look down on prosperity as a thing which--except in fatally -delusive semblance--cannot exist apart from righteousness and faith. -This is the lesson of life, the lesson of lessons. If it does not -solve all problems on their intellectual side, it scatters all -perplexities in the spiritual sphere. It shows us that duty is the -reward of duty, and that there can be no happiness save for those who -have learnt that duty and blessedness are one. And thus even by this -book of annals--annals of wild deeds and troubled times--we may be -taught the truths which find their perfect illustration and proof in -the life and teaching of the Son of God. When those truths are our -real possession, the work of life is done. Then - - "Vigour may fail the towering fantasy, - But yet the Will rolls onward, like a wheel - In even motion by the love impelled - That moves the sun in heaven and all the stars." - -FOOTNOTES: - -[916] T. Hodgkin, _Friends' Quarterly_, September 1893, p. 401. - -[917] Jer. xxix. 25-27. - - - - - APPENDIX I - - _THE KINGS OF ASSYRIA, AND SOME OF THEIR - INSCRIPTIONS._ - - -Dates from the _Eponym Canon_ and the Assyrian Monuments; Schrader, -_Cuneiform Inscriptions, and the Old Testament_, E. Tr., 1888, pp. -167-187. - - B.C. - - 860.--Shalmaneser II. - - 854.--Battle of Karkar. War with _Ahab_ and _Benhadad_. - - 842.--War with Hazael. Tribute of _Jehu_. - - 825.--Samsi-Ramman.[918] - - 812.--Ramman-Nirari. - - 783.--Shalmaneser III. - - 773.--Assur-dan III. - - 763.--June 15th. Eclipse of the sun. - - 755.--Assur-Nirari. - - 745.--Tiglath-Pileser II. - - 742.--Azariah (Uzziah) heads a league of nineteen Hamathite - districts against Assyria (?). - - 740.--Death of Uzziah (?). - - 738.--Tribute of Menahem, Rezin, and Hiram. - - 734.--Expedition to Palestine against Pekah. Tribute of Ahaz. - - 732.--Capture of Damascus. Death of Rezin. First actual - collision between Israel and Assyria. - - 728.--Hoshea refuses tribute. - - 727.--Shalmaneser IV. - - 724.--Siege of Samaria begun. - - 722.--Sargon. Fall of Samaria. - - 721.--Defeat of Merodach-Baladan. - - 720.--Battle of Raphia. Defeat of Sabaco, King of Egypt. - - 715.--Subjugated people deported to Samaria. Accession of - Hezekiah. - - 711.--Capture of Ashdod. - - 707.--Building of great palace of Dur-Sarrukin. - - 709.--Sargon expels Merodach-Baladan, and becomes King of - Babylon. - - 705.--Assassination (?) of Sargon. - - 705.--Sennacherib. - - 704.--Embassy of Merodach-Baladan to Hezekiah. - - 703.--Belibus made King of Babylon. - - 702.--Construction of the Bellino Cylinder. - - 721.--Siege of Ekron. Defeat of Egypt at Altaqu. Siege of - Jerusalem. Campaign against Hezekiah and Tirhakah - disastrously concluded at Pelusium and Jerusalem. - - 681.--Murder of Sennacherib. - - 681.--Esar-haddon. - - 676.--Manasseh pays tribute. - - 668.--Assur-bani-pal (Sardanapalus). - - 608.--Death of Josiah in the battle of Megiddo against Pharaoh - Necho. - -The dates and names of Assyrian kings as given in _Records of the -Past_ (ii. 207, 208) do not exactly accord with these in all cases. - - B.C. - - Tiglath-Pileser II. 950 - Assur-dan II. 930 - Rimmon-Nirari II. 911 - Tiglath-Uras II. 889 - Assur-natzu-pal 883 - Shalmaneser II. 858 - Assur-dain-pal (a rebel) 825 - Samsi-Rimmon II. 823 - Rimmon-Nirari III. 810 - Shalmaneser III. 781 - Assur-dan III. 771 - Assur-Nirari 753 - Tiglath-Pileser III. (Pul) 745 - Shalmaneser IV. (an usurper) 727 - Sargon (Jareb?) (usurper) 722 - Sennacherib 705 - Esar-haddon I. 681 - Assur-bani-pal 668 - * * * * * * - Destruction of Nineveh under Esar-haddon - II., or Sarakos 606 - - - INSCRIPTION OF SHALMANESER II. ON THE BLACK OBELISK - IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM[919] - -It begins with an invocation to the gods Rimmon, Adar, Merodach, -Nergal, Beltis, Istar, and proceeds:-- - -"I am Shalmaneser, the strong king, king of all the four Zones of the -Sun, the marcher over the whole world, ... who has laid his yoke upon -all lands hostile to him, and has swept them like a whirlwind." - -It tells of his campaigns against the Hittites etc., etc. - -The allusion to Jehu runs as follows:-- - -"The tribute of Yahua, son of Khumri, silver, gold, bowls of gold, -vessels of gold, goblets of gold, pitchers of gold, lead, sceptres for -the king's hand, staves, I received." - -This inscription is supplemented by another on a monolith found at -Karkh, twenty miles from Diarbekr (_Records_, iii 81-100), which -mentions the battle of Karkar, with its slaughter of fourteen thousand -of the enemy, among whom was Sirlai--_i.e._, Ahab of Israel. - - - II - - TIGLATH-PILESER II. (CIRC. B.C. 739) - -In his Records he mentions no less than five Hebrew kings--Azariah, -Jehoahaz (Ahaz), Menahem, Pekah, Hoshea--as well as Rezin of Damascus, -Hiram of Tyre, etc. His name perhaps means "He who puts his trust in -Adar." See _Records of the_ _Past_, v. 45-52; Schrader, _Keilinschr._, -pp. 149-151; G. Smith, _Assyrian Discoveries_, pp. 254-287. - -Unfortunately the inscriptions are very mutilated and fragmentary. - - - III - -Our chief knowledge of SARGON is from the great inscription in the -Palace of Khorsabad. It is translated by Prof. Dr. Jules Oppert, -_Records of the Past_, ix. 1-21. The king's inscription at Bavian, -north-east of Mosul, is in the same volume, pp. 21-28, translated by -Dr. T. G. Pinches. See, too, _id._, vii. 21-56, xi. 15-40. - -The Khorsabad inscription has these passages:-- - -"The great gods have made me happy by the constancy of their affection; -they have granted me the exercise of my sovereignty over all kings." - -He says:-- - -"I besieged and occupied the town of Samaria; I took twenty-seven -thousand two hundred and eighty of its inhabitants captive. I took -from them fifty chariots, but left them the rest of their belongings. -I placed my lieutenants over them; I renewed the obligations imposed -upon them _by one of the kings who preceded me_." [Tiglath-Pileser, -whom Sargon does not choose to name.] - -"Hanun, King of Gaza, and Sabaco, Sultan of Egypt, allied themselves -at _Raphia_ to oppose me. I put them to flight. Sabaco fled, and no -one has seen any trace of him since. I imposed a tribute on Pharaoh, -King of Egypt." - -He tells us that he defeated the usurper Ilubid of Hamath, who had -been a smith; burnt Karkar; and flayed Ilubid alive. - -He defeated Azuri and Jaman of Ashdod, and his most persistent enemy, -Merodach-Baladan, son of Jakin, King of Chaldæa. - -He ends with a prayer that Assur may bless him. - - - IV - -Bellino's Cylinder comprises the first two years of SENNACHERIB. It is -translated by Mr. H. F. Talbot, _Records of the Past_, i. 22-32. It -was published by Layard in the first volume of _British Museum -Inscriptions_, pl. 63. The facsimile of it was made by Bellino. - -It begins:-- - -"SENNACHERIB, the great king, the powerful king, the king of Assyria, -the king unrivalled, the pious monarch, the worshipper of the great -gods, ... the noble warrior, the valiant hero, the first of all kings, -the great punisher of unbelievers who are breakers of the holy -festivals. - -"Assur, my lord, has given me an unrivalled monarchy. Over all princes -he has raised triumphantly my arms. - -"In the beginning of my reign I defeated Marduk-Baladan, King of -Babylon, and his allies the Elamites, in the plains near the city of -Kish. He fled alone; he got into the marshes full of reeds and rushes, -and so saved his life." - -(He proceeds to narrate the spoiling of Marduk's camp, and his palace -in Babylon, and how he carried off his wife, his harem, his nobles.) - -We see here an illustration of the vaunting tones of this king which -are so faithfully reproduced in 2 Kings xviii. - -His Bull Inscription, chiefly relating to his defeats of -Merodach-Baladan, is translated by Rev. J. M. Rodwell (_Records of the -Past_, vii. 57-64). - - - V - -The Taylor Cylinder, so called from its former possessor, is a hexagonal -clay prism found at Nineveh in 1830, and now in the British Museum -(translated by Mr. H. F. Talbot, _Records of the Past_, i. 33-53). - -The first two campaigns of Sennacherib are related as on the Bellino -Cylinder. The Taylor Cylinder narrates campaigns of his first eight -years. - -The story of the third campaign narrates the defeat of Elulæus, King -of Sidon; the tribute of Menahem, King of Samaria; the defeat of -Zidka, King of Askelon; the revolt of Ekron, which deposed the -Assyrian vassal Padi, and sent him in iron chains to Hezekiah; the -battle of Egypt and Ethiopia at Altaqu (Eltekon, Josh. xv. 59), and -the capture of Timnath. Of Hezekiah the king says:-- - -"And Hezekiah, King of Judah, who had not bowed down at my feet, -forty-six of his strong cities, castles, and smaller towns, with -warlike engines, I captured; 200,500 people, small and great, male and -female, horses, sheep, etc., without number, I carried off. Himself I -shut up like a bird in a cage inside Jerusalem. Siege-towers against -him I constructed. I gave his plundered cities to the kings of Ashdod, -Ekron, and Gaza. I diminished his kingdom; I augmented his tribute. -The fearful splendour of my majesty had overwhelmed him. The horsemen, -soldiers, etc., which he had collected for the fortification of -Jerusalem his royal city, now carried tribute, thirty talents of gold, -eight hundred of silver, scarlet, embroidered woven cloth, large -precious stones, ivory couches and thrones, skins, precious woods; his -daughters, his harem, his male and female slaves, unto Nineveh, my -royal city, after me he sent; and to pay tribute he sent his envoy." - -He then narrates his fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh campaigns -against Elam, etc. His eighth was against "the children of Babylon, -wicked devils," etc. He ends by describing the splendour of the palace -which he built. - - - VI - -An inscription of ESAR-HADDON, found at Kouyunjik, now in the British -Museum, mentions his receipt of the intelligence of his father's -murder by his unnatural brothers, while he was commanding his fathers -army on the northern confines. - -"From my heart I made a vow. My liver was inflamed with rage. -Immediately I wrote letters, saying I assumed the sovereignty of my -Father's House." He prayed to the gods and goddesses; they encouraged -him, and in spite of a great snowstorm he reached Nineveh, and defeated -his brother, because Istar stood by his side and said to their army, "An -unsparing deity am I" (_Records of the Past_, iii, 100-108). - - - VII - -A terra-cotta cylinder of ASSUR-BANI-PAL (the Sardanapalus of the -Greeks) is now in the British Museum. It is translated by Mr. G. -Smith, _Records of the Past_, i. 55-106, ix. 37-64; Oppert, _Mémoire -sur les Rapports de l'Egypte et l'Assyrie_; and G. Smith, _Annals of -Assur-bani-pal_. - -Its most interesting parts relate to the campaign of his father -Esar-haddon against Egypt, and how Tirhakah, King of Egypt and -Ethiopia, reoccupied Memphis. He defeated the army of Tirhakah, who, -to save his life, fled from Memphis to Thebes. The Assyrians then took -Thebes, and restored Necho's father, Psamatik I., to Memphis and Sais, -and other Egyptian kings, friends of Assyria, who had fled before -Tirhakah. The kings, however, proved ungrateful, and made a league -against him. He therefore threw them into fetters, and had them -brought to Nineveh, but subsequently released Necho with splendid -presents. Tirhakah fled to Ethiopia, where he "went to his place of -night"--_i.e._, died. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[918] Up to the time of Tiglath-Pileser II., the Eponym Year (which is -not here given) marks the second complete year of each king's reign. - -[919] This Shalmaneser died about B.C. 825, after a reign of -thirty-five years (Sayce in _Records of the Past_, v. 27-42; Oppert, -_Hist. des Empires de Chaldée et d'Assyrie_; Ménant, _Annales des Rois -d'Assyrie_, 1874). - - - - - APPENDIX II - - _INSCRIPTION IN THE TUNNEL OF SILOAM_ - - -The inscription of Siloam is the oldest known Hebrew inscription. "It is -engraved on the rocky wall of the subterranean channel which conveys the -water of the Virgin's Spring at Jerusalem into the Pool of Siloam. In -the summer of 1880 one of the native pupils of Dr. Schick, a German -architect, was playing with other lads in the Pool, and while wading up -the subterranean channel slipped and fell into the water. On rising to -the surface he noticed, in spite of the darkness, what looked like -letters on the rock which formed the southern wall of the channel. Dr. -Schick visited the spot, and found that an ancient inscription, -concealed for the most part by the water, actually existed there." The -level of the water was lowered, but the inscription had been partly -filled up with a deposit of lime, and the first intelligible copy was -made by Professor Sayce in February 1881, and six weeks later by Dr. -Guthe. Professor Sayce had to sit for hours in the mud and water, -working under masonry or earth. There can be little doubt that this work -is alluded to in 2 Kings xx. 20; 2 Chron. xxxii. 30; Isa. viii. 6 ("the -waters of Shiloah ["the tunnel"?] which flow softly"). - -The alphabet is that used by the prophets before the exile, somewhat -like that on the Moabite Stone, and on early Israelitish and Jewish -seals. The language is pure Hebrew, with only one unknown -word--_zadah_, in line three: perhaps "excess" or "obstacle." - -Professor Sayce thinks that it proves that "the City of David" (Zion) -must have been on the southern hill, the so-called Ophel. If so, the -Valley of the Sons of Hinnom must be the rubbish-choked Tyropœon, -under which must be the tombs of the kings, and the relics of the -Temple and Palace destroyed by Nebuchadrezzar. - -The inscription is:-- - -"The excavation! Now this is the history of the excavation. While the -excavators were lifting up the pick each towards his neighbour, and -while there were yet three cubits [to excavate], there was heard the -voice of one man calling to his neighbour, for there was an excess in -the rock on the right hand [and on the left?]. And after that on the -day of excavating, the excavators had struck pick against pick, one -against another, the water flowed from the spring [_môtsâ_, "exit," 2 -Chron. xxxii. 30] to the Pool" (that of Siloam, which therefore was -the only one which then existed) "for twelve hundred cubits. And -[part] of a cubit was the height of the rock over the head of the -excavators" (Sayce, _Records of the Past_, i. 169-175). - -The letters are on an artificial tablet cut in the wall of rock, -nineteen feet from where the subterranean conduit opens on the Pool of -Siloam, and on the right-hand side. The conduit is at first sixteen -feet high, but lessens in one place to no more than two feet. It is, -according to Captain Conder, seventeen hundred and eight yards long, -but not in a straight line, as there are two _culs-de-sac_, caused by -faulty engineering. The engineers, beginning, as at Mount Cenis, from -opposite ends, intended to meet in the middle, but failed. The floor -has been rounded to allow the water to flow more easily. It is a -splendid piece of engineering for that age. - -The Pool of Siloam is at the south-east end of a hill which lies to -the south of the Temple hill: the Virgin's Fountain is on the opposite -side of the hill, more to the north, and is the only natural spring or -"Gihon" near Jerusalem, so that its water was of supreme importance. -Being outside the city wall, a conduit was necessary. Hezekiah -"stopped all the fountains" (2 Chron. xxxii. 4)--_i.e._, concealed -them. By providing a subterranean channel for them, he saved them from -the enemy and secured the water-supply of the besieged city. - - - - - APPENDIX III - - _WAS THERE A GOLDEN CALF AT DAN?_ - - -The question might seem absurd, but for its solution I must refer to -my paper on the subject in the _Expositor_ for October 1893. - -The _sole_ authorities for a calf at Dan are 1 Kings xii. 28-30; 2 -Kings x. 29. If in the former passage we alter _one letter_, and read -האפד (the "ephod") for האחד (the "one")--as Klostermann suggests--we -throw light on an obscure and perhaps corrupt passage. The allusion -then would be to Micah's old idolatrous image (which _may_ have been a -calf) at Dan. The two words "and in Dan" in 2 Kings x. 29 may easily -have been (as Klostermann thinks) an exegetical gloss added from the -error of one letter in 1 Kings xii. 30. - -Dan was a most unlikely place to select: for (1) It was a remote -frontier town; and (2) there was no room, and no necessity there, for -a new cultus beside the ancient one established some centuries -earlier, and still served by priests who were direct lineal -descendants of Moses (Judg. xviii. 30, 31). - -This would further account for the absolute silence of prophets and -historians about any golden calf at Dan; and it adds to the inherent -probability, also supported by some evidence, that there were _two_ -cherubic calves at Bethel. - -For further arguments I must refer to my paper. - - - - - APPENDIX IV - - _DATES OF THE KINGS OF ISRAEL AND JUDAH, AS - GIVEN BY KITTEL AND OTHER MODERN CRITICS[920]_ - - - ISRAEL - - B.C. - - Ahaziah 855-854 - Jehoram 854-842 - Jehu 842-814 - Jehoahaz 814-797 - Joash 797-781 - Jeroboam II. 781-740 - Zachariah 740 - Shallum 740 - Menahem 740-737 - Pekahiah 737-735 - Pekah 735-734 - Hoshea 734-725 - - JUDAH - - B.C. - - Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat 851-843 - Ahaziah ben-Jehoram 843-842 - Athaliah 842-836 - Joash ben-Ahaziah 836-796 - Amaziah 796-783 - Amaziah-Uzziah 783-737 - Jotham 737-735 - Ahaz 735-715 - Hezekiah 715-686 - - Manasseh 686-641 - Amon 641-639 - Josiah 639-608 - Jehoahaz 608 - Jehoiakim 608-597 - Jehoiachin 597 - Zedekiah 597-586 - -FOOTNOTE: - -[920] Many of these dates can only be regarded as uncertain and -approximate. Kamphausen dates the commencement of all the latter kings -a year later (_Die Chronologie der hebräischen Könige_, Bonn, 1883). - - - - -Transcriber's Notes: - - -Obvious punctuation and spelling errors have been fixed throughout. - -Inconsistent hyphenation left as in the original text. - -Missing footnote anchors have been placed, when possible to determine -placement. - -Footnote 198: Greek has been corrected to add accents. - -Footnote 215: Greek has been corrected. - - - - - - -End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Expositor's Bible, by F. W. Farrar - -*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE *** - -***** This file should be named 42027-0.txt or 42027-0.zip ***** -This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: - http://www.gutenberg.org/4/2/0/2/42027/ - -Produced by Douglas L. Alley, III, Colin Bell and the -Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net -(This file was produced from images generously made -available by The Internet Archive) - - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions -will be renamed. - -Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no -one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation -(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without -permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, -set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to -copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to -protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project -Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you -charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you -do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the -rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose -such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and -research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do -practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is -subject to the trademark license, especially commercial -redistribution. - - - -*** START: FULL LICENSE *** - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project -Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at - www.gutenberg.org/license. - - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy -all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. -If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the -terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or -entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement -and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" -or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the -collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an -individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are -located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from -copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative -works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg -are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project -Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by -freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of -this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with -the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by -keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project -Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in -a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check -the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement -before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or -creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project -Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning -the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United -States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate -access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently -whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, -copied or distributed: - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived -from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is -posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied -and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees -or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work -with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the -work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 -through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the -Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or -1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional -terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked -to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the -permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any -word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or -distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than -"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version -posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), -you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a -copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon -request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other -form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided -that - -- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is - owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he - has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the - Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments - must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you - prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax - returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and - sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the - address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to - the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." - -- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or - destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium - and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of - Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any - money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days - of receipt of the work. - -- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set -forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from -both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael -Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the -Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm -collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain -"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or -corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual -property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a -computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by -your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with -your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with -the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a -refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity -providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to -receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy -is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further -opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER -WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO -WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. -If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the -law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be -interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by -the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any -provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance -with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, -promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, -harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, -that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do -or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm -work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any -Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. - - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers -including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists -because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from -people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. -To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 -and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org - - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive -Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent -permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. -Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered -throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 -North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email -contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the -Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -For additional contact information: - Dr. Gregory B. Newby - Chief Executive and Director - gbnewby@pglaf.org - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To -SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any -particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. -To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm -concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared -with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project -Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. -unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily -keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. - -Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: - - www.gutenberg.org - -This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/old/42027-0.zip b/old/42027-0.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index dd9f6c2..0000000 --- a/old/42027-0.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/42027-8.txt b/old/42027-8.txt deleted file mode 100644 index 1868926..0000000 --- a/old/42027-8.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,16905 +0,0 @@ -The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Expositor's Bible, by F. W. Farrar - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - - -Title: The Expositor's Bible - The Second Book of Kings - -Author: F. W. Farrar - -Editor: W. Robertson Nicoll - -Release Date: February 5, 2013 [EBook #42027] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 - -*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE *** - - - - -Produced by Douglas L. Alley, III, Colin Bell and the -Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net -(This file was produced from images generously made -available by The Internet Archive) - - - - - - - - - - The - - Expositor's Bible - - - Edited by - W. Robertson Nicoll, D.D., LL.D. - - - - - - - - - -[Illustration] - - - - - THE EXPOSITORS' BIBLE - - _Edited by_ W. ROBERTSON NICOLL, D.D., LL.D. - - _New and Cheaper Edition. Printed from original plates - Complete in every detail. Uniform with this volume_ - - Price 50 cents per volume. (If by mail add 10 cents postage) - - - OLD TESTAMENT VOLUMES - - GENESIS. By Rev. Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D. - - EXODUS. By Very Rev. G. A. Chadwick, D.D., Dean of Armagh. - - LEVITICUS. By Rev. S. H. Kellogg, D.D. - - NUMBERS. By Rev. R. A. Watson, D.D. - - DEUTERONOMY. By Rev. Prof. Andrew Harper, B.D. - - JOSHUA. By Rev. Prof. W. G. Blaikie, D.D., LL.D. - - JUDGES AND RUTH. By Rev. R. A. Watson, D.D. - - FIRST SAMUEL. By Rev. Prof. W. G. Blaikie, D.D., LL.D. - - SECOND SAMUEL. By same author. - - FIRST KINGS. By F. W. Farrar, D.D., Dean of Canterbury. - - SECOND KINGS. By same author. - - FIRST AND SECOND CHRONICLES. By Rev. Prof. W. H. Bennett. - - EZRA, NEHEMIAH, AND ESTHER. By Rev. Prof. W. F. Adeney. - - JOB. By Rev. R. A. Watson, D.D. - - PSALMS. In 3 vols. Vol. I., Chapters I.-XXXVIII.; Vol. II., Chapters - XXXIX.-LXXXIX.; Vol. III., Chapters XC.-CL. By Rev. - Alexander Maclaren, D.D. - - PROVERBS. By Rev. R. F. Horton, D.D. - - ECCLESIASTES. By Rev. Samuel Cox, D.D. - - SONG OF SOLOMON and LAMENTATIONS. By Rev. Prof. W. F. Adeney. - - ISAIAH. In 2 vols. Vol. I., Chapters I.-XXXIX.; Vol. II., Chapters - XL.-LXVI. By Prof. George Adam Smith, D.D., LL.D. - - JEREMIAH. Chapters I.-XX. With a Sketch of his Life and Times. By - Rev. C. J. Ball. - - JEREMIAH. Chapters XXI.-LII. By Rev. Prof. W. H. Bennett. - - EZEKIEL. By Rev. Prof. John Skinner. - - DANIEL. By F. W. FARRAR, D.D., Dean of Canterbury. - - THE TWELVE (Minor) PROPHETS. In 2 vols. By Rev. George Adam Smith, - D.D., LL.D. - - - NEW TESTAMENT VOLUMES - - ST. MATTHEW. By Rev. J. Monro Gibson, D.D. - - ST. MARK. By Very Rev. G. A. Chadwick, D.D., Dean of Armagh. - - ST. LUKE. By Rev. Henry Burton. - - GOSPEL OF ST. JOHN. In 2 vols. Vol. I., Chapters I.-XI.; Vol. II., - Chapters XII.-XXI. By Rev. Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D. - - THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. In 2 vols. By Rev. Prof. G. T. Stokes, D.D. - - ROMANS. By Rev. Handley C. G. Moule, D.D. - - FIRST CORINTHIANS. By Rev. Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D. - - SECOND CORINTHIANS. By Rev. James Denney, D.D. - - GALATIANS. By Rev. Prof. G. G. Findlay, D.D. - - EPHESIANS. By same author. - - PHILIPPIANS. By Rev. Principal Robert Rainy, D.D. - - COLOSSIANS and PHILEMON. By Rev. Alexander Maclaren, D.D. - - THESSALONIANS. By Rev. James Denney, D.D. - - PASTORAL EPISTLES. By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D. - - HEBREWS. By Rev. Principal T. C. Edwards, D.D. - - ST. JAMES and ST. JUDE. By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D. - - ST. PETER. By Rev. Prof. J. Rawson Lumby, D.D. - - EPISTLES OF ST. JOHN. By Rt. Rev. W. Alexander, Lord Bishop of Derry. - - REVELATION. By Prof. W. Milligan, D.D. - - INDEX VOLUME TO ENTIRE SERIES. - - _New York_: HODDER & STOUGHTON, _Publishers_ - - - - - THE - SECOND BOOK OF KINGS - - - - - - BY - F. W. Farrar, D.D., F.R.S. - - LATE FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE; ARCHDEACON OF - WESTMINSTER - - - - - - - - HODDER & STOUGHTON - NEW YORK - GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY - - - - - CONTENTS - - - - CHAPTER I - - PAGE - - AHAZIAH BEN-AHAB OF ISRAEL (B.C. 855-854) 3 - - A weak, shadowy, and faithless king--1. Relations between Judah and - Israel--2. Alliance with Jehoshaphat--3. Revolt of Moab--Mesha and - the Moabite Stone--4. The fall from the lattice--Baal-Zebub--Elijah - calling down fire from heaven--How are we to judge respecting the - Elijah-spirit?--Variations of moral standard. - - CHAPTER II - - THE ASCENSION OF ELIJAH 19 - - Uncertain date--The journey to Gilgal; to Bethel; to Jericho; to - the Jordan--The double portion--Chariot and horses of fire--Elisha - recrosses the Jordan--The young prophets and their - search--Grandeur of Elijah. - - CHAPTER III - - ELISHA 25 - - Cycle of supernatural stories--Elisha and Elijah--The cure of the - unwholesome fountain--"Go up, thou bald-head"--The children and - the bears. - - CHAPTER IV - - THE INVASION OF MOAB 29 - - Death of Ahaziah--Jehoram Ben-Ahab of Israel--Good - beginnings--Attempts to recover Moab--Alliance with Judah and - Edom--The invasion--An army perishing of - thirst--Elisha--Music--Trenches in the wdy--Error of the - Moabites--Their disastrous rout--Devastation of the - country--Mesha propitiates Chemosh--"Great wrath against - Israel"--The invading army retreats. - - CHAPTER V - - ELISHA'S MIRACLES 40 - - Their chronological vagueness--Difference between Elisha and - Elijah--Contrasts and resemblances--Social life in Israel--1. The - widow and the oil--2. The lady of Shunem--Her hospitality--Her - reward--3. The boy's death--Her distress--The resuscitation--4. - Death in the pot--5. The multiplied first-fruits. - - CHAPTER VI - - THE STORY OF NAAMAN 50 - - The little maid--The leper--Letter of Benhadad to Jehoram--His - indignation--Elisha's message--Naaman's disappointment and - anger--His servants--His healing--His gratitude--Bowing in the house - of Rimmon--Mean cupidity of Gehazi--Stricken with leprosy--The - axe-head. - - CHAPTER VII - - ELISHA AND THE SYRIANS 66 - - Syrian marauders--They are baffled--Anger of Benhadad--The vision - at Dothan--Meaning of the promises--How fulfilled to God's saints - on earth--Some are delivered, some are not--Elisha misleads the - Syrians--His generosity to them--Its effects--A fresh Syrian - invasion. - - CHAPTER VIII - - THE FAMINE AND THE SIEGE 76 - - Horrible straits of the besieged Samaritans--Stress of famine--The - King of Israel--The miserable women--Sackcloth under the - purple--The king's fury and despair--He threatens Elisha--The - messenger--The king upbraids him--Prophecy of sudden plenty--The - disbelieving lord--The extramural lepers--The Syrian camp--The - king's misgivings--The lord killed in the rush of the people. - - CHAPTER IX - - THE SHUNAMMITE AND HAZAEL 87 - - The lady of Shunem leaves her estate--Her return--Gehazi talks with - the king--Entrance of the Shunammite--Her estates restored--Elisha - visits Damascus--A royal present--Benhadad's illness--Hazael--The - dark prophecy--Unexplained death of Benhadad--Hazael's - usurpation--Real meaning of Elisha's words to Hazael. - - CHAPTER X - - TWO SONS OF JEHOSHAPHAT 99 - - Jehoram (B.C. 851-843)--Ahaziah (B.C. 843-842)--Jehoram - ben-Jehoshaphat of Judah--Perplexing uncertainty of minute - chronological details--The blight of the Jezebel-alliance--The - husband of Athaliah--His apostasies--Revolt of Edom--Narrow escape - of Jehoram--Revolt of Libnah--Jehoram's murder by his - brethren--Philistine invasion--Incurable disease--Ahaziah - ben-Jehoram--Joins his uncle (Jehoram ben-Ahab) in the campaign - against Ramoth-Gilead--Visits him at Jezreel--Shot down by Jehu. - - CHAPTER XI - - THE REVOLT OF JEHU (B.C. 842) 106 - - Misery of Jehoram's reign--Thwarted invasion of Moab--Aggression - of Benhadad--At Ramoth-Gilead--The young prophet--The two kings - absent from the camp--The dangerous commission--The assembled - captains--Jehu secretly anointed--His accession enthusiastically - welcomed by the army--His sudden enthronement--His swift - resolution--The watchman at Jezreel--The two horsemen--The two - kings--Their murder--Ferocity of Jehu--Elijah's - prophecy--Jezebel--She is hurled down--Jehu drives over her - body--The curse fulfilled. - - CHAPTER XII - - JEHU ESTABLISHED ON THE THRONE (B.C. 842-814) 125 - - His politic subtlety--The murder of the seventy princes--The - ghastly heaps--Hypocritic ferocity. - - CHAPTER XIII - - FRESH MURDERS--THE EXTIRPATION OF BAAL-WORSHIP (B.C. 842) 131 - - Wading through blood to a throne--The ride to Samaria--The brethren - of Ahaziah of Judah--The corpse-choked tank of the shepherds--The - Bedawy ascetic--The scene of slaughter in the temple of Baal--Did - Elisha approve of these atrocities?--Prophetic judgment on - Jehu--Ravages of Hazael--Jehu's anguish--He pays tribute to Assyria. - - CHAPTER XIV - - ATHALIAH (B.C. 842-836)--JOASH OF JUDAH (B.C. 836-796) 146 - - The murderess-daughter of Jezebel--Fierce ambition--Jehosheba--The - rescued child--Reared in the Temple--The high priest's plot--The - coronation of the boy-king--Athaliah enters the Temple--Her - murder--The fate of Baal's high priest--Proposed restoration of - the Temple--Joash calls to task the defaulting priests--Death of - Jehoiada--Defection of Joash--Murder of Zechariah--Bad record of - the line of Jewish priests--Hazael attacks Judah--Defeat of Joash - and plunder of Jerusalem--Murder of Joash--Names of the murderers. - - CHAPTER XV - - AMAZIAH OF JUDAH (B.C. 796-783[?]) 167 - - The House of David--Amaziah brings to justice the murderers of his - father, but spares their children--Grounds for this--Different - views taken of him by the historian and the chronicler--Splendid - victory of Amaziah in the Valley of Salt--Expansion of the story - in the Chronicles--His defiance of Joash--His defeat and murder. - - CHAPTER XVI - - THE DYNASTY OF JEHU--JEHOAHAZ (B.C. 814-797)--JOASH - (B.C. 797-781) 175 - - Israel at its nadir--Calf-worship--Oppression of - Hazael--Disappearance of Elisha--Repentance of Jehoahaz--Joash of - Israel visits the death-bed of Elisha--"The arrow of the Lord's - deliverance"--Three victories over the Syrians--Death of Elisha, - and posthumous marvels--Joash and Amaziah--Contemptuous answer to - the King of Judah--Crushing defeat of Judah. - - CHAPTER XVII - - THE DYNASTY OF JEHU (CONTINUED)--JEROBOAM II. (B.C. 781-740) 187 - - Jeroboam II. the greatest of the kings of Israel--His conquests - and wide dominion--A dying gleam of prosperity--Cause of his - success--Relations with Assyria--Dawn of written prophecy--Jonah. - - CHAPTER XVIII - - AMOS AND HOSEA--ZACHARIAH BEN-JEROBOAM (B.C. 740) 193 - - Amos describes the condition of Israel--Growth of usury and - vice--Humble origin of Amos--His burdens--Degenerations of the - "calf-worship"--Uncompromising denunciation--Collision of Amos - with Amaziah the high priest at Bethel--His expulsion from - Bethel--The curse denounced--His justification of his - mission--Hosea the saddest of the prophets--His pictures of - Ephraim--Jeroboam II.--His death--His son Zachariah--His - desertion and shameful end. - - CHAPTER XIX - - UZZIAH OF JUDAH (B.C. 783[?]-737)--JOTHAM (B.C. 737-735) 209 - - Wane of Assyria--Uzziah a wise and good king--His other name - Azariah--Expansion of the story of his conquests in the - Chronicles--Training of his army--Defeated by the Assyrians - (?)--Stricken with leprosy--The story--Jotham acts as his public - representative--Diminished power of Judah under Jotham--Beginning - of Isaiah's prophecies--Death of Jotham. - - CHAPTER XX - - THE AGONY OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM--SHALLUM, MENAHEM, PEKAHIAH, - PEKAH (B.C. 740-734) 217 - - Shallum, an usurping murderer--Rapid disappearance of - kings--Distracted epoch--The prophet Zechariah and the three - shepherds--Zechariah's prophecies--The cruel shepherd, - Menahem--His savage deeds--Portentous appearance of the Assyrians - in Israel--Menahem pays tribute--Tiglath-Pileser--Fulfilment of - Hosea's prophecy--Pekahiah--His murder--Pekah--His alliance with - Rezin against Judah--Ahaz appeals to Assyria--Defeat and death of - Rezin--Fulfilment of prophecy of Amos--Beginning of the captivity - of the Ten Tribes--Tiglath-Pileser's successors--Murder of Pekah - by Hoshea--Horrible state of Israel as described by Isaiah. - - CHAPTER XXI - - KING HOSHEA AND THE FALL OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM (B.C. - 734-725) 235 - - The name Hoshea--The king and the prophet--Occasional gleams of hope - and promise--A humiliating reign--Death of Tiglath-Pileser--Hoshea - revolts to Sabaco of Egypt--Seized by Shalmaneser--Samaria - besieged--Terrible state of the city--Sabaco renders no - help--Usurpation of Sargon--Capture of the city--Greatness of - Sargon--Fall of the Northern Kingdom--Blighted destiny--God's - mercy--"God, and not man"--Despoliation of the tribes--Moral of the - story--Assyria and Egypt--The strength and weakness of a - nation--Machiavelli--Mixture of alien emigrants--Their worship--The - lions--Strange syncretism--The Jews and the Samaritans. - - CHAPTER XXII - - THE REIGN OF AHAZ (B.C. 735-715) 260 - - The chronology--A distracted kingdom--Dark pictures from - Isaiah--No sign of repentance--Grapes and wild grapes. - - CHAPTER XXIII - - ISAIAH AND AHAZ 265 - - Isaiah--Rezin and Pekah--Ahaz meets Isaiah--He receives a promise - of deliverance--He refuses a sign--The sign given - him--Immanuel--Birth of Messianic - prophecy--Maher-shalal-hash-baz--The promised Deliverer. - - CHAPTER XXIV - - THE APOSTASIES OF AHAZ 273 - - Moloch-worship--Sacrifice of children--Ahaz appeals to Assyria for - help--Ruin of Damascus and death of Rezin--Ahaz does homage to - Tiglath-Pileser at Damascus--Records of Tiglath-Pileser--The new - altar--Complaisance of the priest Urijah--Unpopularity of - Ahaz--Further misgivings--His death. - - CHAPTER XXV - - HEZEKIAH (B.C. 715-686) 287 - - Dates--Importance of the reign--Hezekiah's age--His character--His - reformation--Partial suppression of the _bamoth_--Removal of the - _matstseboth_ and _Asherim_--Destruction of the brazen - serpent--Trust in Jehovah--Psalm xlvi.--Chastisement of the - Philistines--Three parties in Jerusalem--1. The Assyrian party--2. - The Egyptian party--3. The national party--Its attitude to the - others--Micah--Mockery of Egypt--Anger and insults of the priests - against Isaiah--Confidence of Isaiah--Waverings of Hezekiah. - - CHAPTER XXVI - - HEZEKIAH'S SICKNESS--THE BABYLONIAN EMBASSY 305 - - The story of Hezekiah's illness misplaced--At the point of - death--Isaiah's message--The king's agony of mind--The prayer--The - reprieve--The sun-dial of Ahaz--The king's gratitude and - thanksgiving--Merodach-Baladan--Rising power of Babylon--Object of - the embassy--The king's action--The prophet's reproof--The king's - humble submission. - - CHAPTER XXVII - - HEZEKIAH AND ASSYRIA (B.C. 701) 319 - - Greatness of Sargon--His campaigns--Defeat of Egypt at the battle - of Raphia--Ashdod--Defeat of Merodach-Baladan--Grandeur of - Sennacherib--His invasion of Juda--Earlier collisions--His - campaigns--1. Against Babylon--2. Against Elam--3. Against the - Hittites and Philistines--Defeat of the Ethiopian Tirhakah at - Altaqu--Heavy mulct imposed on Hezekiah--Siege of - Lachish--Sennacherib breaks his compact--Distress of Jerusalem. - - CHAPTER XXVIII - - THE GREAT DELIVERANCE (B.C. 701) 331 - - Embassy of the Turtan, the Rabsaris, and the Rabshakeh--Misery and - licence in the city--The conference--Oration of the Rabshakeh--Its - effect on the king's ministers and on the people--Taunting insults - of the Rabshakeh--Faithfulness and self-control of the - people--Heroic faith of Isaiah--Failure of the - embassy--Sennacherib's threatening letter--Hezekiah's - prayer--Isaiah promises deliverance in the name of Jehovah--The - sign--The angel of death--Scene of the catastrophe--The Egyptian - tradition of Sethos and the mice--Death and burial of - Hezekiah--The campaign as recorded on the Assyrian monuments--The - triumph of indomitable faith--Grandeur of Isaiah--Wane of - Assyria--Beautiful tolerance of Isaiah. - - CHAPTER XXIX - - MANASSEH (B.C. 686-641) 351 - - The name Manasseh--His tender age--Influence of evil - counsellors--Heathenising party--Their dislike of Hezekiah's - reformation and of the exclusive worship of Jehovah--Tendency to - trust in sacrifices and asceticism--Sanctification of - licence--Arguments of the heathenisers--Disparagement of the work - of Isaiah--Doubts and disbelief--Influence of the - _bamoth_-priests--Reliance on Assyria--The immoral and idolatrous - reaction--1. Restoration of the _bamoth_, and arguments in their - favour--2. Adoption of Phoenician nature-worship--3. Assyrian - Sabaism and star-worship--Connivance of the priests--4. Canaanite - Moloch-worship--5. Mesopotamian Shamanism--6. The - _Asherah_--Denunciation of the prophets--Persecution and the - shedding of innocent blood--Asserted captivity, repentance, and - reforming energy of Manasseh--Difficulties of the story--Reign of - Amon (B.C. 641-639)--Wretchedness of his reign--Zephaniah and - Jeremiah--Murder of Amon. - - CHAPTER XXX - - JOSIAH (B.C. 639-608) 374 - - Three vast movements--Jeremiah's earlier prophecies--The state of - society--The Scythians--Prophecies of Ezekiel--Herodotus--The fate - of Nineveh--Rise of the Chaldans--Habakkuk. - - CHAPTER XXXI - - JOSIAH'S REFORMATION 385 - - Growth of Josiah's character--Repairs of the Temple--Hilkiah finds - the Book of the Law--Intense effect produced on mind of the - king--His message to the prophetess Huldah--Great - assembly--Renewal of a solemn league and covenant with - Jehovah--The _bamoth_-priests degraded--Defiling of Tophet--He - carries the reformation into Samaria--Its stringency and - severity--The Passover--Suppression of heathen - corruptions--Jeremiah's share in the reformation--Its dangers and - disappointing results--Jeremiah's warnings against all trust in - externals--The prophecy of a new covenant--NOTE TO CHAPTER XXXI.: - The Book found in the Temple. - - CHAPTER XXXII - - THE DEATH OF JOSIAH (B.C. 608) 402 - - Prosperity and happiness of Josiah--Accession of the great Pharaoh - Necho II.--His excursion against Carchemish--Josiah determines to - bar his path--Warnings of Pharaoh Necho--Disaster at Megiddo and - death of Josiah--Mistaken hopes--God's dealings with men and - nations--Distress among Josiah's subjects--The king's - burial--Misgivings respecting the future--Sorrow of - Jeremiah--Ultimate fulfilments. - - CHAPTER XXXIII - - JEHOAHAZ (B.C. 608) 411 - - Four sons of Josiah--Shallum chosen by the people of the land--Elegy - of Ezekiel--Change of name from Shallum to Jehoahaz--Conquests of - Pharaoh Necho II.--Jehoahaz summoned to Riblah--Carried captive by - Pharaoh to Egypt--Tribute imposed on Juda. - - CHAPTER XXXIV - - JEHOIAKIM (B.C. 608-597) 416 - - Eliakim--His change of name--Ignored by Ezekiel--Evil - influences--sthetic selfishness and oppressive - greed--Denunciation by Habakkuk--Denunciation by Jeremiah--Murder - of Urijah--Threatened murder of Jeremiah averted by Ahikam--Fall - of Nineveh--Utterances of the prophets--Rise of the - Chaldans--Nabopolassar--Defeat of Pharaoh Necho by - Nebuchadrezzar--His return to Babylon--His invasion of - Juda--Beginning of the Babylonian captivity--Jehoiakim revolts to - Egypt in spite of Jeremiah's warnings--Imprisonment of - Jeremiah--Baruch--The menacing roll--Alarm of the princes--Rage of - the king--He cuts the scroll to pieces and burns it--Wretchedness - of the times--A great drought--Captives of Jerusalem--Miserable - death of Jehoiakim--"That which was found in him." - - CHAPTER XXXV - - JEHOIACHIN (B.C. 597) 431 - - Bad influence over him--His brief reign--Allusions to him by - Jeremiah at Jerusalem--Second captivity--Regret felt for - Jehoiachin--Did he die childless? - - CHAPTER XXXVI - - ZEDEKIAH, THE LAST KING OF JUDAH (B.C. 597-586) 437 - - His oath to the King of Assyria--Ezekiel's prophecies--The exiles - and the remnant--Weakness of Zedekiah--Continuance of idolatry as - described by Ezekiel--The king breaks his oath with - Assyria--Indignation and warnings of Jeremiah--The false prophet - Hananiah--The wooden and iron yokes--Death of Hananiah--False - prophets--The broken covenant--Advance of - Nebuchadrezzar--Belomancy and Babylonian divinations--Siege of - Jerusalem--Gloom of Jeremiah's prophecies. - - CHAPTER XXXVII - - JEREMIAH AND HIS PROPHECIES 449 - - Pathos of Jeremiah's lot--The sad epoch in which he - lived--Religious changes--Arrest of Jeremiah--Progress of the - siege--Zedekiah sends for the prophet--His hardships - alleviated--Horrors of famine--Wicked defiance--A sudden - death--Anger of the priests and nobles against Jeremiah--He is - thrust into a miry pit--Compassion of Ebed-Melech--Purchase of a - field at Anathoth--Secret interview with Zedekiah--It becomes - known--Distress of Zedekiah. - - CHAPTER XXXVIII - - THE FALL OF JERUSALEM (B.C. 586) 457 - - Nebuzaradan and the Babylonians--The final captivity--Dreadful - fate of Zedekiah--Prophecies of Ezekiel and Jeremiah--Sack of the - city--Massacre of the chief inhabitants--Burning of the city and - Temple--Desolation--Respect shown by the Babylonian general to - Jeremiah--He decides to remain with the remnant in Juda. - - CHAPTER XXXIX - - GEDALIAH (B.C. 586) 465 - - Sad parting from the exiles--The wail at Ramah--Gedaliah's - appointment as satrap perhaps due to Jeremiah--Desolation of - Jerusalem--The seat of government removed to Mizpah--A respite and - a gleam of hope--Guerilla bands--Johanan warns Gedaliah against - Ishmael--Unsuspecting generosity of the governor--He receives - Ishmael and his confederates with hospitality--He is brutally - murdered--Massacre of the pilgrims from Shiloh--The horrible - well--Johanan pursues Ishmael--His escape--Proposal to migrate to - Egypt--Jeremiah consulted--His advice refused--Prophecy of - Jeremiah at the khan of Chimham--Kindness shown by Evil-Merodach - to Jehoiachin. - - EPILOGUE 477 - - The interest of the preceding history and the great moral lessons - which it involves--The central conceptions of Hebrew prophecy--The - end of the whole matter. - - APPENDIX I - - THE KINGS OF ASSYRIA, AND SOME OF THEIR INSCRIPTIONS 487 - - APPENDIX II - - INSCRIPTION IN THE TUNNEL OF THE POOL OF SILOAM 493 - - APPENDIX III - - WAS THERE A GOLDEN CALF AT DAN? 494 - - APPENDIX IV - - DATES OF THE KINGS OF ISRAEL AND JUDAH, AS GIVEN BY KITTEL AND - OTHER MODERN CRITICS 495 - - - - - THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS - - - - -"Theories of inspiration which impaginate the Everlasting Spirit, and -make each verse a cluster of objectless and mechanical miracles, are -not seriously believed by any one: the Bible itself abides in its -endless power and unexhausted truth. All that is not of asbestos is -being burned away by the restless fires of thought and criticism. That -which remains is enough, and it is indestructible."--BISHOP OF DERRY. - - - - - CHAPTER I - - _AHAZIAH BEN-AHAB OF ISRAEL_ - - B.C. 855-854 - - 2 KINGS i. 1-18 - - "Ye know not of what spirit are ye."--LUKE ix. 55. - - "He is the mediator of a better covenant, which hath been enacted - upon better promises."--HEB. viii. 6. - - -Ahaziah, the eldest son and successor of Ahab, has been called "the most -shadowy of the Israelitish kings."[1] He seems to have been in all -respects one of the most weak, faithless, and deplorably miserable. He -did but reign two years--perhaps in reality little more than one; but -this brief space was crowded with intolerable disasters. Everything that -he touched seemed to be marked out for ruin or failure, and in character -he showed himself a true son of Jezebel and Ahab. - -What results followed the defeat of Ahab and Jehoshaphat at -Ramoth-Gilead we are not told. The war must have ended in terms of -peace of some kind--perhaps in the cession of Ramoth-Gilead; for -Ahaziah does not seem to have been disturbed during his brief reign by -any Syrian invasion. Nor were there any troubles on the side of Judah. -Ahaziah's sister was the wife of Jehoshaphat's heir, and the good -understanding between the two kingdoms was so closely cemented, that -in both royal houses there was an identity of names--two Ahaziahs and -two Jehorams. - -But even the Judan alliance was marked with misfortune. Jehoshaphat's -prosperity and ambition, together with his firm dominance over -Edom--in which country he had appointed a vassal, who was sometimes -allowed the courtesy title of king[2]--led him to emulate Solomon by -an attempt to revive the old maritime enterprise which had astonished -Jerusalem with ivory, and apes, and peacocks imported from India. He -therefore built "ships of Tarshish" at Ezion-Geber to sail to Ophir. -They were called "Tarshish-ships," because they were of the same build -as those which sailed to Tartessus, in Spain, from Joppa. Ahaziah was -to some extent associated with him in the enterprise. But it turned -out even more disastrously than it had done in former times. So -unskilled was the seamanship of those days among all nations except -the Phoenicians, that the whole fleet was wrecked and shattered to -pieces in the very harbour of Ezion-Geber before it had set sail. - -Ahaziah, whose affinity with the King of Tyre and possession of some -of the western ports had given his subjects more knowledge of ships -and voyages, then proposed to Jehoshaphat that the vessels should be -manned with sailors from Israel as well as Judah. But Jehoshaphat was -tired of a futile and expensive effort. He refused a partnership which -might easily lead to complications, and on which the prophets of -Jehovah frowned. It was the last attempt made by the Israelites to -become merchants by sea as well as by land. - -Ahaziah's brief reign was marked by one immense humiliation. David, who -extended the dominion of the Hebrews in all directions, had smitten the -Moabites, and inflicted on them one of the horrible atrocities against -which the ill-instructed conscience of men in those days of ignorance -did not revolt.[3] He had made the male warriors lie on the ground, and -then, measuring them by lines, he put every two lines to death and kept -one alive. After this the Moabites had continued to be tributaries. They -had fallen to the share of the Northern Kingdom, and yearly acknowledged -the suzerainty of Israel by paying a heavy tribute of the fleeces of a -hundred thousand lambs and a hundred thousand rams. But now that the -warrior Ahab was dead, and Israel had been crushed by the catastrophe at -Ramoth-Gilead, Mesha, the energetic viceroy of Moab, seized his -opportunity to revolt and to break from the neck of his people the -odious yoke. The revolt was entirely successful. The sacred historian -gives us no details, but one of the most priceless of modern -archological discoveries has confirmed the Scriptural reference by -securing and translating a fragment of Mesha's own account of the -annals of his reign. We have, in what is called "The Moabite Stone," the -memorial written in glorification of himself and of his god Chemosh, -"the abomination of the children of Ammon," by a contemporary of Ahab -and Jehoshaphat.[4] It is the oldest specimen which we possess of Hebrew -writing; perhaps the only specimen, except the Siloam inscription, which -has come down to us from before the date of the Exile. It was discovered -in 1878 by the German missionary Klein, amid the ruins of the royal city -of Daibon (Dibon, Num. xxi. 30), and was purchased for the Berlin Museum -in 1879. Owing to all kinds of errors and intrigues, it did not remain -in the hands of its purchaser, but was broken into fragments by the -nomad tribe of Beni Hamide, from whom it was in some way obtained by M. -Clermont-Ganneau. There is no ground for questioning its perfect -genuineness, though the discovery of its value led to the forgery of a -number of spurious and often indecent inscriptions. There can be no -reasonable doubt that when we look at it we see before us the identical -memorial of triumph which the Moabite emr erected in the days of -Ahaziah on the _bamah_ of Chemosh at Dibon, one of his chief towns. - -This document is supremely interesting, not only for its historical -allusions, but also as an illustration of customs and modes of thought -which have left their traces in the records of the people of Jehovah, -as well as in those of the people of Chemosh.[5] Mesha tells us that -his father reigned in Dibon for thirty years, and that he succeeded. -He reared this stone to Chemosh in the town of Karcha, as a memorial -of gratitude for the assistance which had resulted in the overthrow of -all his enemies. Omri, King of Israel, had oppressed Moab many days, -because Chemosh was wroth with his people. Ahaziah wished to oppress -Moab as his father had done. But Chemosh enabled Mesha to recover -Medeba, and afterwards Baal-Meon, Kirjatan, Ataroth, Nebo, and Jahaz, -which he reoccupied and rebuilt. Perhaps they had been practically -abandoned by all effective Israelite garrisons. In some of these towns -he put the inhabitants under a ban, and sacrificed them to Moloch in a -great slaughter. In Nebo alone he slew seven thousand men. Having -turned many towns into fortresses, he was enabled to defy Israel -altogether, to refuse the old burdensome tribute, and to re-establish -a strong Moabite kingdom east of the Dead Sea; for Israel was wholly -unable to meet his forces in the open field. Month after month of the -reign of the miserable son of Ahab must have been marked by tidings of -shame, defeat, and massacre. - -Added to these public calamities, there came to Ahaziah a terrible -personal misfortune. As he was coming down from the roof of his -palace, he seems to have stopped to lean against the lattice of some -window or balcony in his upper chamber in Samaria.[6] It gave way -under his weight, and he was hurled down into the courtyard or street -below. He was so seriously hurt that he spent the rest of his reign on -a sick-bed in pain and weakness, and ultimately died of the injuries -he had received. - -A succession of woes so grievous might well have awakened the wretched -king to serious thought. But he had been trained under the idolatrous -influences of his mother. As though it were not enough for him to walk -in the steps of Ahab, of Jezebel, and of Jeroboam, he had the fatuity to -go out of his way to patronise another and yet more odious superstition. -Ekron was the nearest town to him of the Philistine Pentapolis, and at -Ekron was established the local cult of a particular Baal known as -Baal-Zebub ("the lord of flies").[7] Flies, which in temperate countries -are sometimes an intense annoyance, become in tropical climates an -intolerable plague. Even the Greeks had their Zeus Apomuios ("Zeus the -averter of flies"), and some Greek tribes worshipped Zeus Ipuktonos -("Zeus the slayer of vermin"), and Zeus Muiagros and Apomuios, and -Apollo Smintheus ("the destroyer of mice").[8] The Romans, too, among -the numberless quaint heroes of their Pantheon, had a certain Myiagrus -and Myiodes, whose function it was to keep flies at a distance.[9] This -fly-god, Baal-Zebub of Ekron, had an oracle, to whose lying responses -the young and superstitious prince attached implicit credence. That a -king of Israel professing any sort of allegiance to Jehovah, and having -hundreds of prophets in his own kingdom, should send an embassy to the -shrine of an abominable local divinity in a town of the -Philistines--whose chief object of worship was - - "That twice-battered god of Palestine, - Who mourned in earnest when the captive ark - Maimed his brute image on the grunsel edge - Where he fell flat, and shamed his worshippers"-- - -was, it must be admitted, an act of apostasy more outrageously -insulting than had ever yet been perpetrated by any Hebrew king. -Nothing can more clearly illustrate the callous indifference shown by -the race of Jezebel to the lessons which God had so decisively taught -them by Elijah and by Micaiah. - -But - - _Quem vult Deus perire, dementat prius_; - -and in this "dementation preceding doom" Ahaziah sent to ask the -fly-god's oracle whether he should recover of his injury. His -infatuated perversity became known to Elijah, who was bidden by "the -angel," or messenger, "of the Lord"--which may only be the recognised -phrase in the prophetic schools, putting in a concrete and vivid form -the voice of inward inspiration--to go up, apparently on the road -towards Samaria, and meet the messengers of Ahaziah on their way to -Ekron. Where Elijah was at the time we do not know. Ten years had -elapsed since the calling of Elisha, and four since Elijah had -confronted Ahab at the door of Naboth's vineyard. In the interval he -has not once been mentioned, nor can we conjecture with the least -certainty whether he had been living in congenial solitude or had -been helping to train the Sons of the Prophets in the high duties of -their calling. Why he had not appeared to support Micaiah we cannot -tell. Now, at any rate, the son of Ahab was drawing upon himself an -ancient curse by going a-whoring after wizards and familiar spirits, -and it was high time for Elijah to interfere.[10] - -The messengers had not proceeded far on their way when the prophet met -them, and sternly bade them go back to their king, with the -denunciation, "Is it because there is no God in Israel that ye go to -inquire of Baal-Zebub, the god of Ekron? Now, therefore, thus saith -Jehovah, 'Thou shalt not descend from that bed on which thou art gone -up, but dying thou shalt die.'" - -He spoke, and after his manner vanished with no less suddenness. - -The messengers, overawed by that startling apparition, did not dream -of daring to disobey. They at once went back to the king, who, -astonished at their reappearance before they could possibly have -reached the oracle, asked them why they had returned. - -They told him of the apparition by which they had been confronted. -That it was a prophet who had spoken to them they knew; but the -appearances of Elijah had been so few, and at such long intervals, -that they knew not who he was. - -"What sort of man was he that spoke to you?" asked the king. - -"He was," they answered, "a lord of hair,[11] and girded about his -loins with a girdle of skin."[12] - -Too well did Ahaziah recognise from this description the enemy of his -guilty race! If he had not been present on Carmel, or at Jezreel, on -the occasions when that swart and shaggy figure of the awful Wanderer -had confronted his father, he must have often heard descriptions of -this strange Bedawy ascetic who "feared man so little because he -feared God so much." - -"It is Elijah the Tishbite!" he exclaimed, with a bitterness which was -succeeded by fierce wrath; and with something of his mother's -indomitable rage he sent a captain with fifty soldiers to arrest him. - -The captain found Elijah sitting at the top of "the hill," perhaps of -Carmel; and what followed is thus described:-- - -"Thou man of God," he cried, "the king hath said, Come down." - -There was something strangely incongruous in this rude address. The -title "man of God" seems first to have been currently given to Elijah, -and it recognises his inspired mission as well as the supernatural -power which he was believed to wield. How preposterous, then, was it -to bid a man of God to obey a king's order and to give himself up to -imprisonment or death! - -"If I be a man of God," said Elijah, "then let fire come down from -heaven, to consume thee and thy fifty."[13] - -The fire fell and reduced them all to ashes.[14] - -Undeterred by so tremendous a consummation, the king sent another -captain with his fifty, who repeated the order in terms yet more -imperative.[15] - -Again Elijah called down the fire from heaven, and the second captain -with his fifty soldiers was reduced to ashes. - -For the third time the obstinate king, whose infatuation must indeed -have been transcendent, despatched a captain with his fifty. But he, -warned by the fate of his predecessors, went up to Elijah and fell on -his knees, and implored him to spare the life of himself and his fifty -innocent soldiers. - -Then "the angel of the Lord" bade Elijah go down to the king with him -and not be afraid. - -What are we to think of this narrative? - -Of course, if we are to judge it on such moral grounds as we learn from -the spirit of the Gospel, Christ Himself has taught us to condemn it. -There have been men who so hideously misunderstood the true lessons of -revelation as to applaud such deeds, and hold them up for modern -imitation. The dark persecutors of the Spanish Inquisition, nay, even -men like Calvin and Beza, argued from this scene that "fire is the -proper instrument for the punishment of heretics." To all who have been -thus misled by a false and superstitious theory of inspiration, Christ -Himself says, with unmistakable plainness, as He said to the Sons of -Thunder at Engannim, "Ye know not what spirit ye are of. I am not come -to destroy men's lives, but to save."[16] In the abstract, and judged by -Christian standards, the calling down of lightning to consume more than -a hundred soldiers, who were but obeying the orders of a king--the -protection of personal safety by the miraculous destruction of a king's -messengers--could only be regarded as a deed of horror. "There are few -tracks of Elijah that are ordinary and fit for common feet," says Bishop -Hall; and he adds, "Not in his own defence would the prophet have been -the death of so many, if God had not, by a peculiar instinct, made him -an instrument of His just vengeance."[17] - -For myself, I more than doubt whether we have any right to appeal to -these "peculiar instincts" and unrecorded inspirations; and it is so -important that we should not form utterly false views of what -Scripture does and does not teach, that we must once more deal with -this narrative quite plainly, and not beat about the bush with the -untenable devices and effeminate euphemisms of commentators, who give -us the "to-and-fro-conflicting" apologies of _a priori_ theory instead -of the clear judgments of inflexible morality. - -"It is impossible not to feel," says Professor Milligan,[18] "that the -events thus presented to us are of a very startling kind, and that it -is not easy to reconcile them either with the conception that we form -of an honoured servant of God, or with our ideas of eternal justice. -Elijah rather appears to us at first sight as a proud, arrogant, and -merciless wielder of the power committed to him: we wonder that an -answer should have been given to his prayer; we are shocked at the -destruction of so many men, who listened only to the command of their -captain and their king; and we cannot help contrasting Elijah's -conduct, as a whole, with the beneficent and loving tenderness of the -New Testament dispensation." - -Professor Milligan proceeds rightly to set aside the attempts which -have been made to represent the first two captains and their fifties -as especially guilty--which is a most flimsy hypothesis, and would not -in any case touch the heart of the matter. He says that the event -stands on exactly the same footing as the slaughter of the 450 -prophets of Baal at Kishon, and of the 3000 idolaters by order of -Moses at Sinai; the swallowing up of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram; the -ban of total extirpation on Jericho and on Canaan; the sweeping -massacre of the Amalekites by Saul; and many similar instances of -recorded savagery. But the reference to analogous acts furnishes no -justification for those acts. What, then, is their justification, if -any can be found? - -Some would defend them on the grounds that the potter may do what he -likes with the clay. That analogy, though perfectly admissible when -used for the purpose to which it is applied by St. Paul, is grossly -inapplicable to such cases as this. St. Paul uses it simply to prove -that we cannot judge or understand the purposes of God, in which, as -he shows, mercy often lies behind apparent severity. But, when urged -to maintain the rectitude of sweeping judgments in which a man arms -his own feebleness with the omnipotence of Heaven, they amount to no -more than the tyrant's plea that "might makes right." "Man is a reed," -said Pascal, "but he is a _thinking_ reed." He may not therefore be -indiscriminately crushed. He was made by God in His image, after His -likeness, and therefore his rights have a Divine and indefeasible -sanction. - -All that can be said is that these deeds of wholesale severity were -not in disaccord with the conscience even of many of the best Old -Testament saints. They did not feel the least compunction in -inflicting judgments on whole populations in a way which would argue -in us an infamous callousness. Nay, their consciences approved of -those deeds; they were but acting up to the standard of their times, -and they regarded themselves as righteous instruments of divinely -directed vengeance.[19] Take, for instance, the frightful Eastern law -which among the Jews no less than among Babylonians and Persians -thought nothing of overwhelming the innocent with the guilty in the -same catastrophe; which required the stoning, not only of Achan, but -of all Achan's innocent family, as an expiation for his theft; and the -stoning, not only of Naboth, but also of Naboth's sons, in requital -for his asserted blasphemy. Two reasons may be assigned for the chasm -between their moral sense and ours on such subjects--one was their -amazing indifference to the sacredness of human life, and the other -their invariable habit of regarding men in their corporate relations -rather than in their individual capacity. Our conscience teaches us -that to slay the innocent with the guilty is an action of monstrous -injustice;[20] but they, regarding each person as indissolubly mixed -up with all his family and tribe, magnified the conception of -_corporate responsibility_, and merged the individual in the mass. - -It is clear that, if we take the narrative literally, Elijah would not -have felt the least remorse in calling fire from heaven to consume these -scores of soldiers, because the prophetic narrator who recorded the -story, perhaps two centuries later, must have understood the spirit of -those days, and certainly felt no shame for the prophet's act of -vengeance. On the contrary, he relates it with entire approval for the -glorification of his hero. We cannot blame him for not rising above the -moral standard of his age. He held that the natural manifestation of an -angry Jehovah was, literally or metaphorically, in consuming fire. -Considering the slow education of mankind in the most elementary -principles of mercy and righteousness, we must not judge the views of -prophets who lived so many ages before Christ by those of religious -teachers who enjoy the inherited experience of two millenniums of -Christianity. Thus much is plainly taught us by Christ Himself, and -there perhaps we might be content to leave the question. But we are -compelled to ask, Do we not too much form all our judgments of the -Scripture narratives on _a priori_ traditions and unreasoned prejudices? -Can we with adequate knowledge and honest conviction declare our -certainty that this scene of destruction ever occurred as a literal -fact? If we turn to any of the great students and critics of Germany, to -whom we are indebted for the floods of light which their researches have -thrown on the sacred page, they with almost consentient voice regard -these details of this story as legendary. There is indeed every reason -to believe the account of Ahaziah's accident, of his sending to consult -the oracle of Baal-Zebub, of the turning back of his messengers by -Elijah, and of the menace which he heard from the prophet's lips. But -the calling down of lightning to consume his captains and soldiers to -ashes belongs to the cycle of Elijah-traditions preserved in the schools -of the prophets; and in the case of miracles so startling and to our -moral sense so repellent--miracles which assume the most insensate folly -on the part of the king, and the most callous ruthlessness on the part -of the prophet--the question may be fairly asked, Is there any proof, is -there anything beyond dogmatic assertion to convince us, that we were -intended to accept them _au pied de la lettre_? May they not be the -formal vehicle chosen for the illustration of the undoubted powers and -righteous mission of Elijah as the upholder of the worship of Jehovah? -In a literature which abounds, as all Eastern literature abounds, in -vivid and concrete methods of indicating abstract truths, have we any -cogent proof that the supernatural details, of which some may have been -introduced into these narratives by the scribes in the schools of the -prophets, were not, in some instances, _meant_ to be regarded as -imaginative apologues? The most orthodox divines, both Jewish and -Christian, have not hesitated to treat the Book of Jonah as an instance -of the use of fiction for purposes of moral and spiritual edification. -Were any critic to maintain that the story of the destruction of -Ahaziah's emissaries belongs to the same class of narratives, I do not -know how he could be refuted, however much he might be denounced by -stereotyped prejudice and ignorance. I do not, however, myself regard -the story as a mere parable composed to show how awful was the power of -the prophets, and how fearfully it might be exercised. I look upon it -rather as possibly the narrative of some event which has been -imaginatively embellished, and intermingled with details which we call -supernatural.[21] Circumstances which we consider natural would be -regarded as directly miraculous by an Eastern enthusiast, who saw in -every event the immediate act of Jehovah to the exclusion of all -secondary causes, and who attributed every occurrence of life to the -intervention of those "millions of spiritual creatures," who - - "walk the earth - Unseen both when we wake and when we sleep." - -If such a supposition be correct and admissible--and assuredly it is -based on all that we increasingly learn of the methods of Eastern -literature, and of the forms in which religious ideas were inculcated -in early ages--then all difficulties are removed. We are not dealing -with the mercilessness of a prophet, or the wielding of Divine powers -in a manner which higher revelation condemns, but only with the -well-known fact that the Elijah-spirit was not the Christ-spirit, and -that the scribes of Ramah or Gilgal, and "the men of the tradition" -and the "men of letters" who lived at Jabez, when they used the -methods of Targum and Haggadah in handing down the stories of the -prophets, had not received that full measure of enlightenment which -came only when the Light of the World had shone.[22] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[1] Rawlinson, _Kings of Israel and Judah_, p. 86. "The name of -Ahaziah ('the Lord taketh hold'), like that of all Ahab's sons, -testifies to the fact that the husband of Jezebel still worshipped -Jehovah. Among the names of the judges and kings before Ahab in -Israel, and Asa in Judah, scarcely a single instance occurs of names -compounded with Jehovah; thenceforward they became the rule" -(Wellhausen, _Israel and Judah_, Es. 1, p. 66). - -[2] 1 Kings xxii. 47; 2 Kings iii. 9: comp. viii. 20. - -[3] 2 Sam. viii. 2. On the ethics of these wars of extermination, such -as are commanded in the Pentateuch, and were practised by Joshua, -Samuel, Saul, David, and others, see Josh. vi. 17; 1 Sam. xv. 3, 33; 2 -Sam. viii. 2, etc., and Mozley's _Lectures on the Old Testament_, pp. -83-103. - -[4] See Stade, i. 86. He gives a photograph and translation of it at -p. 534. - -[5] See _Records of the Past_, xi. 166, 167. - -[6] 2 Kings i. 2; Heb., _be'ad hass'bakah_; LXX., [Greek: dia tou -diktutou]; Vulg., _per cancellos_ (comp. 1 Kings vii. 18; 2 Chron. -iv. 12). - -[7] LXX., [Greek: Baal muian theon Akkarn]. So, too, Jos., _Antt._, -IX. ii. 1. It is possible that the god was represented holding a fly -as the type of pestilence, just as the statue of Pthah held in its -hands a mouse (Herod., ii. 141). Flies convey all kinds of contagion -(Plin., _H. N._, x. 28). - -[8] Pausan., v. 14, 2. - -[9] The name, or a derisive modification of it, was given by the Jews -in the days of Christ to the prince of the devils. In Matt. xii. 24 -the true reading is [Greek: Beelzeboul], which perhaps means (in -contempt) "the lord of dung"; but might mean "the lord of the -[celestial] habitation" ([Greek: oikodespotn]). Comp. Matt. x. 25; -Eph. ii. 2; "Baal Shamaim," the Belsamen of Augustine (Gesen., _Monum. -Phoenic._, 387; Movers, _Phnizier_, i. 176). For "opprobrious puns" -applied to idols, see Lightfoot, _Exercitationes ad Matt._, xii. 24. -The common word for idols, _gilloolim_, is perhaps connected with -_galal_, "dung." Hitzig thinks that the god was represented under the -symbol of the _Scarabus pillularius_, or dung-beetle. - -[10] Lev. xx. 6. - -[11] [Hebrew: ba'alsetzar] (LXX., [Greek: dasus]), whether in reference -to his long shaggy locks, or his sheepskin _addereth_, [Greek: mlt] -(Zech. xiii. 4; Heb. xii. 37). - -[12] [Greek: zn dermatin] (Matt iii. 4). - -[13] There is perhaps an intentional play of words between "man -([Hebrew: yosh]) of God" and "fire ([Hebrew: 'osh]) of God" -(Klostermann). - -[14] Hebrew. - -[15] "Come down _quickly_" (2 Kings i. 9). - -[16] Luke ix. 51-56. This is a more than sufficient answer to the -censure of Theodoret, that "they who condemn the prophet are wagging -their tongues against God." The remark is based on utter -misapprehension; and if we are to form no judgment on the morality of -Scripture examples, they would be of no help for us. Compare the -striking remark of the minister to Balfour of Burleigh in Scott's _Old -Mortality_. - -[17] Quoted by Rev. Professor Lumby, _ad loc._ - -[18] _Elijah_, p. 146. - -[19] This is practically the sum-total of the answer given again and -again by Canon Mozley in his _Lectures on the Old Testament_, 2nd -edition, 1878. For instance, he says that "the Jewish idea of justice -gives us the reason why the Divine commands (of exterminating wars, -etc.) were then adapted to man as the agent for executing them, and -are not adapted now" (p. 102). - -[20] Comp. Ezek. xviii. 2-30. - -[21] For the _idea_ involved see Num. xi. 1; Deut. iv. 24; Psalm xxi. -9; Isa. xxvi. 11; Heb. x. 27, etc. - -[22] 1 Chron. ii. 55, where "Shimeathites" means "men of the -tradition," and "scribes," "men of letters." - - - - - CHAPTER II - - _THE ASCENSION OF ELIJAH_ - - 2 KINGS ii. 1-18 - - [Greek: lias ex anthrpn phanisth, kai oudeis egn mechris ts - smeron autou tn teleutn.]--JOS., _Antt._, IX. ii. 2. - - [Greek: Gegonasin aphaneis, thanaton de autn oudeis oiden.]--ST. - EPHRM SYRUS. - - -The date of the assumption of Elijah is wholly uncertain, and it -becomes still more so because of the confusion of chronological order -which results from the composite character of the records here -collected. It appears from various scattered notices that Elijah lived -on till the reign of Jehoram of Judah, whereas the narrative in this -chapter is placed before the death of Jehoshaphat. - -When the time came that "Jehovah would take up Elijah by a whirlwind -into heaven," the prophet had a prevision of his approaching end, and -determined for the last time to visit the hills of his native Gilead. -The story of his end, though not written in rhythm, is told in a style -of the loftiest poetry, resembling other ancient poems in its simple -and solemn repetitions. On his way to Gilead, Elijah desires to visit -ancient sanctuaries where schools of the prophets were now -established, and accompanied by Elisha, whose faithful ministrations -he had enjoyed for ten almost silent years, he went to Gilgal. This -was not the Gilgal in the Jordan valley so famous in the days of -Joshua,[23] but _Jiljilia_ in the hills of Ephraim,[24] where many -young prophets were in course of training.[25] - -Knowing that he was on his way to death, Elijah felt the imperious -instinct which leads the soul to seek solitude at the supreme crises -of life. He would have preferred that even Elisha should leave him, -and he bade him stop at Gilgal, because the Lord had sent him as far -as Bethel. But Elisha was determined to see the end, and exclaimed -with strong asseveration, "As Jehovah liveth, and as thy soul liveth, -I will not leave thee." - -So they went on to Bethel, where there was another school of prophets, -under the immediate shadow of Jeroboam's golden calf, though we are -not told whether they continued the protest of the old nameless seer -from Judah, or not.[26] Here the youths of the college came -respectfully to Elisha--for they were prevented by a sense of awe from -addressing Elijah--and asked him "whether he knew that that day God -would take away his master." "Yes, I know it," he answers; but--for -this is no subject for idle talk--"hold ye your peace." - -Once more Elijah tries to shake off the attendance of his friend and -disciple. He bids him stay at Bethel, since Jehovah has sent him on to -Jericho. Once more Elisha repeats his oath that he will not leave -him, and once more the sons of the prophets at Jericho, who warn him -of what is coming, are told to say no more. - -But little of the journey now remains. In vain Elijah urges Elisha to -stay at Jericho; they proceed to Jordan. Conscious that some great -event is impending, and that Elijah is leaving these scenes for ever, -fifty of the sons of the prophets watch the two as they descend the -valley to the river. Here they saw Elijah take off his mantle of hair, -roll it up, and smite the waters with it. The waters part asunder, and -the prophets pass over dry-shod.[27] As they crossed over Elijah asks -Elisha what he should do for him, and Elisha entreats that a double -portion of Elijah's spirit may rest upon him. By this he does not mean -to ask for twice Elijah's power and inspiration, but only for an elder -son's portion, which was twice what was inherited by the younger -sons.[28] "Thou hast asked a hard thing," said Elijah; "but if thou -seest me when I am taken hence, it shall be so." - -The sequel can be only told in the words of the text: "And it came to -pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared -a chariot of fire, and horses of fire,[29] and parted them both -asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven. And Elisha saw -it, and he cried, 'My father, my father, the chariots of Israel, and -the horsemen thereof!'[30] And he saw him no more." - -Respecting the manner in which Elijah ended his earthly career, we -know nothing beyond what is conveyed by this splendid narrative. His -death, like that of Moses, was surrounded by mystery and miracles, and -we can say nothing further about it. The question must still remain -unanswered for many minds whether it was intended by the prophetic -annalists for literal history, for spiritual allegory, or for actual -events bathed in the colourings of an imagination to which the -providential assumed the aspect of the supernatural.[31] We are twice -told that "Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven,"[32] and in that -storm--which would have seemed a fit scene for the close of a career -of storm--God, in the high poetry of the Psalmist, may have made the -winds His angels, and the flames of fire His ministers. For us it must -suffice to say of Elijah, as the Book of Genesis says of Enoch, that -"he was not, for God took him." - -Elisha signalised the removal of his master by a burst of natural -grief. He seized his garments and rent them in twain. Elijah had -dropped his mantle of skin, and his grieving disciple took it with him -as a priceless relic.[33] The legendary St. Antony bequeathed to St. -Athanasius the only thing which he had, his sheepskin mantle; and in -the mantle of Elijah his successor inherited his most characteristic -and almost his sole possession. He returned to Jordan, and with this -mantle he smote the waters as Elijah had done. At first they did not -divide;[34] but when he exclaimed, "Where is the Lord, the God of -Elijah, even He?" they parted hither and thither. Seeing the portent, -the sons of the prophets came with humble prostrations, and -acknowledged him as their new leader. - -They were not, however, satisfied with what they had seen, or had -heard from Elisha, of the departure of the great prophet, and begged -leave to send fifty strong men to search whether the wind of the Lord -had not swept him away to some mountain or valley. Elisha at first -refused, but afterwards yielded to their persistent importunity. They -searched for three days among the hills of Gilead, but found him not, -either living or dead, as Elisha had warned them would be the case. - -From that time forward Elijah has taken his place in all Jewish and -Mohammedan legends as the mysterious and deathless wanderer. Malachi -spoke of him as destined to appear again to herald the coming of the -Messiah,[35] and Christ taught His disciples that John the Baptist had -come in the spirit and power of Elijah. In Jewish legend he often -appears and disappears. A chair is set for him at the circumcision of -every Jewish child. At the Paschal feast the door is set open for him -to enter. All doubtful questions are left for decision until he comes -again. To the Mohammedans he is known as the wonder-working and awful -El Khudr.[36] - -Elisha is mentioned but once in all the later books of Scripture; but -Elijah is mentioned many times, and the son of Sirach sums up his -greatness when he says: "Then stood up Elias as fire, and his word -burned like a torch. O Elias, how wast thou honoured in thy wondrous -deeds! and who may glory like unto thee--who anointed kings to take -revenge, and prophets to succeed after him--who wast ordained for -reproof in their times, to pacify the wrath of the Lord's judgment -before it broke forth into fury, and to turn the heart of the father -unto the son, and to restore the tribes of Jacob! Blessed are they -that saw thee and slept in love; for we shall surely live!" - -FOOTNOTES: - -[23] Josh. iv. 19; v. 9, 10. - -[24] Deut. xi. 30. It is on a hill south-west of Shiloh (_Seilun_), -near the road to Jericho (Hos. iv. 15; Amos iv. 4). The name means "a -circle," and there may have been an ancient circle of sacred stones -there. - -[25] 2 Kings iv. 38. - -[26] 1 Kings xiii. - -[27] As there are fords at Jericho, the object of this miracle, as of -the one subsequently ascribed to Elisha, is not self-evident. Nothing -is more certain than that there is a Divine economy in the exercise of -supernatural powers. The pomp and prodigality of superfluous portents -belong, not to Scripture, but to the _Acta sanctorum_, and the -saint-stories of Arabia and India. - -[28] Deut. xxi. 17. The Hebrew is [Hebrew: pi-shenayim], "a mouthful, -or ration of two." Comp. Gen. xliii. 34. Even Ewald's "_Nur -Zweidrittel und auch diese kaum_" is too strong (_Gesch._, iii. 517). -In no sense was Elisha greater than Elijah: he wrought more wonders, -but he left little of his teaching, and produced on the mind of his -nation a far less strong impression. - -[29] In 2 Kings vi. 17 the stormblast (_sa'arah_) and chariots and -horses of fire are part of a vision of the Divine protection. Comp. -Isa. lxvi. 15; Job xxxviii, 1; Nah. i. 3; Psalms xviii. 6-15, civ. 3. - -[30] That is, the protection and defence of Israel by thy prayers. - -[31] Even the Church-father St. Ephrm Syrus evidently felt some -misgivings. He says: "Suddenly there came from the height a storm of -fire, and in the midst of the flame the form of a chariot and horses, -and parted them both asunder; the one of them it left on the earth, the -other it carried to the height; but whether the wind carried him, or in -what place it left him, the Scripture has not informed us, but it says -that after some years, a terrifying letter from him full of menaces, was -delivered to King Jehoram of Judah" (quoted by Keil _ad loc._). See 2 -Chron. xxi. 12. The letter is called "a writing" (_miktb_). - -[32] 2 Kings ii. 11; Ecclus. xlviii. 12. The LXX. curiously says [Greek: -en susseism hs eis ton ouranon]. So too the Rabbis, _Sucah_, f. 5. - -[33] The circumstance has left its trace in the proverbs of nations, -and in the German word _Mantelkind_ for a spiritual successor. - -[34] 2 Kings ii. 14. LXX., [Greek: kai ou direth]; Vulg., _Percussit -aquas, et non sunt divis_. - -[35] Mal. iv. 4-6. - -[36] _Bava-Metzia_, f. 37, 2, etc. His name is used for incantations in -the Kabbala. _Kitsur Sh'lh_, f. 71, 1 (Hershon, _Talmudic Miscellany_, -p. 340). The chair set for him is called "the throne of Elijah." For -many Rabbinic legends see Hershon, _Treasures of the Talmud_, pp. -172-178. The Persians regard him as the teacher of Zoroaster. - - - - - CHAPTER III - - _ELISHA_ - - 2 KINGS ii. 1-25 - - "He did wonders in his life, and at death even his works were - marvellous. For all this the people repented not."--ECCLUS. - xlviii. 14, 15. - - -At this point we enter into the cycle of supernatural stories, which -gathered round the name of Elisha in the prophetic communities. Some of -them are full of charm and tenderness; but in some cases it is difficult -to point out their intrinsic superiority over the ecclesiastical -miracles with which monkish historians have embellished the lives of the -saints. We can but narrate them as they stand, for we possess none of -the means for critical or historical analysis which might enable us to -discriminate between essential facts and accidental elements. - -We see at once that the figure of Elisha[37] is far less impressive -than that of Elijah. He inspires less of awe and terror. He lives far -more in cities and amid the ordinary surroundings of civilised life. -The honour with which he was treated was the honour of respect and -admiration for his kindliness. He plays his part in no stupendous -scenes like those at Carmel and at Horeb, and nearly all his miracles -were miracles of mercy. Other remarkable differences are observable -in the records of Elijah and Elisha. In the case of the former his -main work was the opposition to Baal-worship; but although -Baal-worship still prevailed (2 Kings x. 18-27) we read of no protests -raised by Elisha against it. "With him"--perhaps it should be more -accurately said, in the narrative which tells us of him--"the miracles -are everything, the prophetic work nothing." The conception of a -prophet's mission in these stories of him differs widely from that -which dominates the splendid _midrash_ of Elijah. - -His separate career began with an act of beneficence. He had stopped for -a time at Jericho. The curse of the rebuilding of the town upon a site -which Joshua had devoted to the ban had expended itself on Hiel, its -builder. It was now a flourishing city, and the home of a large school -of prophets. But though the situation was pleasant as "a garden of the -Lord,"[38] the water was bad, and the land "miscarried." In other words, -the deleterious spring caused diseases among the inhabitants, and caused -the trees to cast their fruit. So the men of the city came to Elisha, -and humbly addressing him as "my lord," implored his help. He told them -to bring him a new cruse full of salt, and going with it to the fountain -cast it into the springs, proclaiming in Jehovah's name that they were -healed, and that there should be no more death or miscarrying land. The -gushing waters of the Ain-es-Sultn, fed by the spring of Quarantania, -are to this day pointed out as the Fountains of Elisha, as they have -been since the days of Josephus.[39] - -The anecdote of this beautiful interposition to help a troubled city is -followed by one of the stories which naturally repel us more than any -other in the Old Testament. Elisha, on leaving Jericho, returned to -Bethel, and as he climbed through the forest up the ascent leading to -the town through what is now called the Wady Suweint, a number of young -lads--with the rudeness which in boys is often a venial characteristic -of their gay spirits or want of proper training, and which to this day -is common among boys in the East--laughed at him, and mocked him with -the cry "Go up, round-head! go up, round-head!"[40] What struck these -ill-bred and irreverent youngsters was the contrast between the rough -hair-skin garb and unkempt shaggy locks of Elijah, "the lord of hair," -and the smooth civilised aspect and shorter hair of his disciple. If the -word _quereach_ means "bald"[41] we see an additional reason for their -ill-mannered jeers, since baldness was a cause of reproach and suspicion -in the East, where it is comparatively rare. No doubt, too, the conduct -of these young scoffers was the more offensive, and even the more -wicked, because of the deeper reverence for age which prevails in -Eastern countries, and above all because Elisha was known as a prophet. -Perhaps, too, if some other reading lies behind the [Greek: elithazon] -of one MS. of the Septuagint, they pelted him with stones.[42] That -Elisha should have rebuked them, and that seriously--that he should even -have inflicted some punishment upon them to reform their manners--would -have been natural; but we cannot repress the shudder with which we read -the verse, "And he turned back and looked on them, and cursed them in -the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she-bears out of the -wood, and tare forty-and-two children of them." Surely the punishment -was disproportionate to the offence! Who could doom so much as a single -rude boy, not to speak of forty-two, to a horrible and agonising death -for shouting after any one? It is the chief exception to the general -course of Elisha's compassionate interpositions. Here, too, we must -leave the narrative where it is; but we hold it quite admissible to -conjecture that the incident, in some form or other, really -occurred--that the boys were insolent, and that some of them may have -been killed by the wild beasts which at that time abounded in -Palestine--and yet that the _nuances_ of the story which cause deepest -offence to us may have suffered from some corruption of the tradition in -the original records, and may admit of being represented in a slightly -different form. - -After this Elisha went for a time to the ancient haunts of his master -on Mount Carmel, and thence returned to Samaria, the capital of his -country, which he seems to have chosen for his most permanent -dwelling-place. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[37] The name Elisha means "My God is salvation." - -[38] Gen. xiii. 10. "The city of palms" (Deut. xxxiv. 3). - -[39] Jos., _B. J._, IV. viii. 3; Robinson, _Bibl. Researches_, i. 554. - -[40] Abarbanel's notion that they meant "Ascend to heaven as Elijah -did" is absurd. - -[41] [Hebrew: kereha] This means bald at the back of the head, as -[Hebrew: nibbeha] (_gibbeach_), means "forehead-bald" (Ewald, iii. -512). Elisha could not have been bald from old age, since he lived on -for nearly sixty years, and must have been a young man. Baldness -involved a suspicion of leprosy, and was disliked by Easterns (Lev. -xxi. 5, xiii. 43; Isa. iii. 17, 24, xv. 2), as much as by the Romans -(Suet., _Jul. Cs._, 45; _Domit._, 18). Elisha's prophetic activity -lasted through the reigns of Joram, Jehu, Jehoahaz, and Joash (_i.e._, -12 + 28 + 17 + 2 years). - -[42] The [Greek: katepaizon] of the Vat. LXX. implies persistent and -vehement insult. The Post-Mishnic Rabbis, however, say that Elisha was -punished with sickness for this deed (_Bava-Metzia_, f. 87, 1). - - - - - CHAPTER IV - - _THE INVASION OF MOAB_ - - 2 KINGS iii. 4-27 - - "What reinforcement we may gain from hope, - If not, what resolution from despair." - MILTON, _Paradise Lost_, i. 190. - - -Ahaziah, as Elijah had warned him, never recovered from the injuries -received in his fall through the lattice, and after his brief and -luckless reign died without a child. He was succeeded by his brother -Jehoram ("Jehovah is exalted"), who reigned for twelve years.[43] - -Jehoram began well. Though it is said that he did "that which was evil -in the sight of the Lord," we are told that he was not so guilty as his -father or his mother. He did not, of course, abolish the worship of -Jehovah under the cherubic symbol of the calves; no king of Israel -thought of doing that, and so far as we know neither Elijah, nor Elisha, -nor Jonah, nor Micaiah, nor any genuine prophet of Israel before Hosea, -ever protested against that worship, which was chiefly disparaged by -prophets of Judah like Amos and the nameless seer.[44] But Jehoram at -least removed the _Matstsebah_ or stone obelisk which had been reared in -Baal's honour in front of his temple by Ahab, or by Jezebel in his -name.[45] In this direction, however, his reformation must have been -exceedingly partial, for until the sweeping measures taken by Jehu the -temple and images of Baal still continued to exist in Samaria under his -very eyes, and must have been connived at if not approved. - -The first great measure which occupied the thoughts of Jehoram was to -subdue the kingdom of Moab, which had been restored to independence by -the bravery of the great pastoral-king Mesha;[46] or at any rate to -avenge the series of humiliating defeats which Mesha had inflicted on -his brother Ahaziah. A war of forty years' duration[47] had ended in the -complete success of Moab. The loss of a tribute of the fleeces of one -hundred thousand lambs and one hundred thousand rams was too serious to -be lightly faced.[48] Jehoram laid his plans well. First he ordered a -muster of all the men of war throughout his kingdom, and then appealed -for the co-operation of Jehoshaphat and his vassal-king of Edom. Both -kings consented to join him. Jehoshaphat had already been the victim of -a powerful and wanton aggression on the part of King Mesha,[49] from -which he had been delivered by the panic of his foes in the Valley of -Salt. Though the king of Edom had, on that occasion, been an ally of -Mesha, the forces of Edom had fallen the first victims of that -internecine panic. Both Judah and Edom, therefore, had grave wrongs to -avenge, and eagerly seized the opportunity to humble the growing pride -of the people of Chemosh. The attack was wisely arranged. It was -determined to advance against Moab from the south, through the territory -of Edom, by a rough and mountainous track, and, as far as possible, to -take the nation by surprise. The combined host took a seven days' -circuit round the south of the Dead Sea, hoping to find an abundant -supply of water in the stream which flows through the Wady-el-Ahsa, -which separates Edom from Moab.[50] But owing to recent droughts the -Wady was waterless, and the armies, with their horses, suffered all the -agonies of thirst. Jehoram gave way to despair, bewailing that Jehovah -should have brought together these three kings to deliver them a -helpless prey into the hands of Moab. But the pious Jehoshaphat at once -thinks of "inquiring of the Lord" by some true prophet, and one of -Jehoram's courtiers informs him that no less a person than Elisha, the -son of Shaphat, who had been the attendant of Elijah, is with the -host.[51] We are surprised to find that his presence in the camp had -excited so little attention as to be unknown to the king;[52] but -Jehoshaphat, on hearing his name, instantly acknowledged his prophetic -inspiration. So urgent was the need, and so deep the sense of Elisha's -greatness, that the three kings in person went on an embassy "to the -servant of him who ran before the chariot of Ahab." Their humble appeal -to him produced so little elation in his mind that, addressing Jehoram, -who was the most powerful, he exclaimed, with rough indignation: "What -have I to do with thee? Get thee to the prophets of thy -father,"--nominal prophets of Jehovah, who will say to thee smooth -things and prophesy deceits, as four hundred of them did to Ahab--"and -to the Baal-prophets of thy mother." Instead of resenting this scant -respect Jehoram, in utmost distress, deprecated the prophet's anger, and -appealed to his pity for the peril of the three armies. But Elisha is -not mollified. He tells Jehoram that but for the presence of Jehoshaphat -he would not so much as look at him: so completely was the destiny of -the people mixed up with the character of their kings! Out of respect -for Jehoshaphat Elisha will do what he can. But all his soul is in a -tumult of emotion. For the moment he can do nothing. He needs to be -calmed from his agitation by the spell of music, and bids them send a -minstrel to him. The harper came, and as Elisha listened his soul was -composed, and "the hand of the Lord came upon him" to illuminate and -inspire his thoughts.[53] The result was that he bade them dig trenches -in the dry wady, and promised that, though they should see neither wind -nor rain, the valley should be filled with water to quench the thirst of -the fainting armies, their horses and their cattle. After this God would -also deliver the Moabites into their hand; and they were bidden to smite -the cities, fell the trees, stop the wells, and mar the smiling -pasture-lands, which constituted the wealth of Moab, with stones. That -the hosts of Judah and Israel and jealous Edom should be prone to -afflict this awfully devastating vengeance on a power by which they had -been so severely defeated on past occasions, and on which they had so -many wrongs and blood-feuds to avenge, was natural; but it is surprising -to find a prophet of the Lord giving the commission to ruin the gifts of -God and spoil the innocent labours of man, and thus to inflict misery on -generations yet unborn. The behest is directly contrary to rules of -international war which have prevailed even between non-Christian -nations, among whom the stopping or poisoning of wells and the cutting -down of fruit trees has been expressly forbidden. It is also against the -rules of war laid down in Deuteronomy.[54] Such, however, was the -command attributed to Elisha; and, as we shall see, it was fulfilled, -and seems to have led to disastrous consequences. - -Cheered by the promise of Divine aid which the prophet had given them, -the host retired to rest. The next morning at day-dawn, when the -_minchah_ of fine flour, oil, and frankincense was offered,[55] water, -which, according to the tradition of Josephus, had fallen at three -days' distance on the hills of Edom, came flowing from the south and -filled the wady with its refreshing streams. - -The incident itself is highly instructive. It throws light both upon -the general accuracy of the ancient narrative, and on the fact that -events to which a directly supernatural colouring is given are, in -many instances, not so much supernatural as providential. The -deliverance of Israel was due, not to a portent wrought by Elisha, but -to the pure wisdom which he derived from the inspiration of God. When -the counsels of princes were of none effect, and for lack of the -spirit of counsel the people were perishing, his mind alone, -illuminated by a wisdom from on high, saw what was the right step to -take. He bade the soldiers dig trenches in the dry torrent bed,--which -was the very step most likely to ensure their deliverance from the -torment of thirst, and which would be done under similar circumstances -to this day. They saw neither wind nor rain; but there had been a -storm among the farther hills, and the swollen watercourses discharged -their overflow into the trenches of the wady which were ready prepared -for them, and offered the path of least resistance. - -Moab, meanwhile, had heard of the advance of the three kings through the -territories of Edom. The whole military population had mustered in arms, -and stood on the frontier, on the other side of the dry wady, to oppose -the invasion. For they knew this would be a struggle of life and death, -and that if defeated they would have no mercy to expect. When the sun -rose, and its first rays burned on the wady, which had been dry on the -previous evening, the water which, unknown to the Moabites, had filled -the trenches in the night, looked red as blood. Doubtless it may have -been stained, as Ewald says, by the red soil which gave its name to the -red land of the "red king, Edom"; but as it gleamed under the dawn the -Moabites thought that those seemingly crimson pools had been filled with -the blood of their enemies, who had fallen by each other's swords. Their -own recent experience when Jehoshaphat met them in the Valley of Salt -showed them how easy it was for temporary allies to be seized by panic, -and to fight among themselves.[56] - -The army of their invaders was composed of heterogeneous and mutually -conflicting elements. Between Israel and Judah there had been nearly a -century of war,[57] and only a brief reunion; and Edom, recently the -willing and natural ally of Moab, was not likely to fight very -zealously for Judah, which had reduced her to vassalage. So the -Moabites said to one another, as they pointed to the unexpected -apparition of those red pools: "This is blood. The kings are surely -destroyed, and they have smitten each man his fellow. Moab to the -spoil!" They rushed down tumultuously on the camp of Israel, and found -the soldiers of Jehoram ready to receive them. Taken by surprise, for -they had expected no resistance, they were hurled back in utter -confusion and with immense slaughter. The three kings pushed their -advantage to the utmost. They went forward into the land, driving and -smiting the Moabites before them, and ruthlessly carrying out the -command attributed to Elisha. They beat down the cities--most of which -in a land of flocks and herds were little more than pastoral villages; -they rendered the green fields useless with stones; they filled up all -the wells with earth; they felled every fruit-bearing tree of any -value. At last only one stronghold, Kir-haraseth, the chief fenced -town of Moab, held out against them.[58] Even this fortress was sore -bested. The slingers, for which Israel, and specially the tribe of -Benjamin, was so famous, advanced to drive its defenders from the -battlements. King Mesha fought with undaunted heroism. He decided to -take the seven hundred warriors who were left to him, and cut his way -through the besieging host to the king of Edom. He thought that even -now he might persuade the Edomites to abandon this new and unnatural -alliance, and turn the battle against their common enemies. But the -numbers against him were too strong, and he found the plan impossible. -Then he formed a dreadful resolution, dictated to him by the extremity -of his despair. His inscription at Karcha shows that he was a profound -and even fanatical believer in Chemosh, his god. Chemosh could still -deliver him. If Chemosh was, as Mesha says in his inscription, "angry -with his land"--if, even for a time, he allowed his faithful people -and his devoted king to be afflicted--it could not be for any lack of -power on his part, but only because they had in some way offended him, -so that he was wroth, or because he had gone on a journey, or was -asleep, or deaf.[59] How could he be appeased? Only by the offering of -the most precious of all the king's possessions; only by the -self-devotion of the crown-prince, on whom were centred all the -nation's hopes. Mesha would force Chemosh to help him for very shame. -He would offer to Chemosh a human sacrifice, the sacrifice of his -eldest son that should have reigned in his stead. Doubtless the young -prince gave himself up as a willing offering, for that was essential -to the holocaust being valid and acceptable.[60] - -So upon the wall of Kir-haraseth, in the sight of all the Moabites, -and of the three invading armies, the brave and desperate hero of a -hundred fights, who had inflicted so many reverses upon these enemies, -and received so many at their hands, but who, having liberated his -country, now saw all the efforts of his life ruined at one blow--took -his eldest son, kindled the sacrificial fire, and then and there -solemnly offered that horrible burnt-offering.[61] - -And it proved effectual, though far otherwise than Mesha had expected. -He was delivered; and, doubtless, if ever he reared, at Kirharaseth or -elsewhere, another memorial stone, he would have attributed his -deliverance to his national god. But here, in the annals of Elisha, -the result is hurried over, and a veil is, so to speak, dropped upon -the dreadful scene with the one ambiguous expression, "And there was -great wrath against Israel: and they departed from him, and returned -to their own land." - -The phrase awakens but does not satisfy our curiosity. We are not -certain of the translation, or of the meaning. It may be, as in the -margin of the Revised Version, "there came great wrath upon -Israel."[62] But wrath from whom? and on what account? The word -"wrath" all but invariably denotes divine wrath; but we cannot imagine -(as some critics do) that any Israelite of the schools of the prophets -would sanction the notion that the chosen people were allowed to -suffer from the kindled wrath of Chemosh. Can we then suppose that the -desperate act of King Mesha was a proof that Israel, who was no doubt -the most interested and the most remorseless of the invaders, had -pressed the Moabites too hard, and carried his vengeance much too far? -That is by no means impossible. The prophet Amos denounces upon Moab -in after years the doom that fire should devour the palaces of -Kirioth, and that Moab should perish with shoutings, and all his royal -line be cut off, for the far less offence of having burned into lime -the bones of the king of Edom.[63] The command of Elisha did not -exempt the Israelites from their share of moral responsibility. Jehu -was commissioned to be an executioner of vengeance upon the house of -Ahab. Yet Jehu is expressly condemned by the prophet Hosea for the -tiger-like ferocity and horrible thoroughness with which he had -carried out his destined work.[64] Only one other explanation is -possible. If "wrath" here has the unusual sense of human indignation, -the clause can only imply that the armies of Judah and Edom were -roused to anger by the unpitying spirit which Israel had displayed. -The horrible tragedy enacted upon the wall of Kirharaseth awoke their -consciences to the sense of human compassion. These, after all, were -fellow-men--fellow-men of kindred blood to their own--whom they had -driven to straits so frightful as to cause a king to burn his own heir -alive as a mute appeal to his god in the hour of overwhelming ruin. -They had done enough: - - "Sunt lacrim rerum et mentem mortalia tangunt." - -They hastily broke up the league, dissolved the alliance, returned -horror-stricken to their own land. They left Moab indeed in possession -of his last fortress, but they had reduced his territory to a -wilderness before they retired and called it peace. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[43] There are great difficulties in the statement (2 Kings iii. 1) -that he began to reign in the eighteenth year of Jehoshaphat. I have -not entered, nor shall I enter, into the minute and precarious -conjectures necessitated by the uncertainties and contradictions of -this synchronism introduced into the narrative by some editor. Suffice -it that with the aid of the Assyrian records we have certain _points -de repre_; from which we can, with the assistance of the historian, -conjecturally restore the main data. In the dates given at the head of -the chapters I follow Kittel, as a careful inquirer. Some of the -approximately fixed dates are (see Appendix I.):-- - - 854. Battle of Karkar (Ahab and Benhadad against Shalmaneser II.) - 738. Tribute of Menahem to Tiglath-Pileser II. - 732. Fall of Damascus. - 722. Capture of Samaria by Sargon. - 720. Defeat of Sabaco by Sargon in battle of Raphia. - 705. Accession of Sennacherib. - 701. Campaign against Hezekiah. - 608. Death of Josiah. - - -[44] But neither the man of God from Judah nor Amos directly denounce -the calf-worship, so much as its concomitant sins and irregularities. - -[45] Perhaps the true reading is "pillars" (LXX., Vulg., Arab.). - -[46] He is called "a sheep-master," _noked_; LXX., [Greek: nkd]. -Elsewhere the word occurs only in Amos i. 1. The Alex. LXX. has -[Greek: n phern phoron]. - -[47] According to the Moabite Stone. - -[48] It is not clear whether the lambs and rams were sent with the -fleeces. The A.V. says "lambs and rams with their wool," in accordance -with Josephus--[Greek: myriadas eikosi probatn syn tois pokois]. The -LXX. has the vague [Greek: epi pokn], and implies that this was a -special fine after a defeat in the revolt ([Greek: en t -epanastasei]): but comp. Isa. xvi. 1. - -[49] 2 Chron. xx. 1-30. - -[50] Robinson (_Bibl. Res._, ii. 157) identifies it with the brook -_Zered_. Deut. ii. 13; Num. xxi. 12. The name means "valley of -water-pits." W. R. Smith quotes Doughty, _Travels_, i. 26. - -[51] Comp. 1 Kings xxii. 7. The phrase "who poured water on the hands -of Elijah" is a touch of Oriental custom which the traveller in remote -parts of Palestine may still often see. Once, when driven by a storm -into the house of the Sheykh of a tribe which had a rather bad -reputation for brigandage, I was most hospitably entertained; and the -old white-haired Sheykh, his son, and ourselves were waited on by the -grandson, a magnificent youth, who immediately after the meal brought -out an old richly chased ewer and basin, and poured water over our -hands, soiled by eating out of the common dish, of course without -spoons or forks. - -[52] This seems to have struck Josephus (_Antt._, IX. iii. 1), who -says that "he _chanced_ to be in a tent ([Greek: etuche katesknks]) -outside the host." - -[53] Comp. 1 Sam. x. 5; 1 Chron. xxv. 1; Ezek. i. 3, xxxiii. 22. -_Menaggen_ is one who plays on a stringed instrument, _n'gnah_. The -Pythagoreans used music in the same way (Cic., _Tusc. Disp._, iv. 2). - -[54] Deut. xx. 19, 20. - -[55] Lev. ii. 1. Comp. 1 Kings xviii. 36. - -[56] This dreadful result crippled the revolt of Vindex against Nero. - -[57] Jeroboam I., B.C. 937; Joram, 854. - -[58] Isa. xv. 1, Kir of Moab; Jer. xlviii. 31, Kir-heres. It is built -on a steep calcareous rock, surrounded by a deep, narrow glen, which -thence descends westward to the Dead Sea, under the name of the Wady -Kerak. We know that the armies of Nineveh habitually practised these -brutal modes of devastation in the districts which they conquered. See -Layard, _passim_; Rawlinson, _Ancient Monarchies_ ii. 84. - -[59] 1 Kings xviii. 27. Comp. Psalm xxxv. 23, xliv. 23, lxxxiii. 1, etc. - -[60] Comp. Micah vi. 7. This is an entirely different incident from -that alluded to in Amos ii. 1. - -[61] Eusebius (_Prp. Evang._, iv. 16) quotes from Philo's Phoenician -history a reference to human sacrifices ([Greek: tois timrois -daimosin]) at moments of desperation. - -[62] The rendering is doubtful. LXX., [Greek: kai egeneto metamelos -megas epi Isral]; Vulg., indignatio _in_ Israel; Luther, _Da ward -Israel sehr zornig_. - -[63] Amos ii. 1-3. - -[64] Hos. i. 4: "I will avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house of -Jehu." - - - - - CHAPTER V - - _ELISHA'S MIRACLES_ - - 2 KINGS iv. 1-44 - - -We are now in the full tide of Elisha's miracles, and as regards many -of them we can do little more than illustrate the text as it stands. -The record of them clearly comes from some account prevalent in the -schools of the prophets, which is however only fragmentary, and has -been unchronologically pieced into the annals of the kings of Israel. - -The story of Elisha abounds far more in the supernatural than that of -Elijah, and is believed by most critics to be of earlier date. Yet the -scenes and portents of his life are almost wholly lacking in the -element of grandeur which belong to those of the elder seer. His -personality, if on the whole softer and more beneficent, inspires less -of awe, and the whole tone of the biography which recorded these -isolated incidents is lacking in the poetic and impassioned elevation -which marks the episodes of Elijah's history. We see in the records of -Elisha, as in the biographies--so rich in prodigies--of fourth-century -hermits and medival saints, how little impressive in itself is the -exercise of abnormal powers; how it derives its sole grandeur from the -accompaniment of great moral lessons and spiritual revelations. John -the Baptist "did no miracle," yet our Lord placed him not only far -above Elisha, but even above Moses and Samuel and Elijah, when He said -of him, "Verily I say unto you, of them that have been born of women -there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist." - -It is impossible not to be struck with the singular parallelism -between the powers exercised by Elisha and those which are attributed -to his predecessor. "How true an heir is Elisha of his master," says -Bishop Hall, "not in his graces only, but in his actions! Both of them -divided the waters of Jordan, the one as his last act, the other as -his first. Elijah's curse was the death of the captains and their -troops; Elisha's curse was the death of the children. Elijah rebuked -Ahab to his face; Elisha, Jehoram. Elijah supplied the drought of -Israel by rain from heaven; Elisha supplied the drought of the three -kings by waters gushing out of the earth; Elijah increased the oil of -the Sareptan, Elisha increased the oil of the prophet's widow; Elijah -raised from death the Sareptan's son, Elisha the Shunammite's; both of -them had one mantle, one spirit; both of them climbed up one Carmel, -one heaven." The resemblance, however, is not at all in character, but -only in external and miraculous circumstances. In all other respects -Elisha furnishes a contrast to Elijah which startles us quite as much -as any superficial resemblances. Elijah was a free, wild Bedawy -prophet, hating and shunning as his ordinary residence the abodes of -men, making his home in the rocky wady or in the mountain glades, -appearing and disappearing suddenly as the wind. He asserted his power -most often in ministries of retribution. Clad in the sheepskin of a -Gadite shepherd or mountaineer, he was not one of those who wear soft -clothing or are found in kings' houses. He usually met monarchs as -their enemy and their reprover, but for the most part avoided them. He -never intervened for years together even in national events of the -utmost importance, whether military or religious, unless he received -the direct call of God, or there appeared to him to be a "_dignus -Vindice nodus_." Elisha, on the other hand, makes his home in cities, -and chiefly in Samaria. He is familiar with kings and moves about with -armies, and has no long retirements into unknown solitudes; and though -he could speak roughly to Jehoram, he is often on the friendliest -terms with him and with other sovereigns. - -The stories of Elisha give us many interesting glimpses into the -social life of Israel in his day. As to their literal historic -accuracy, those must make positive affirmation who feel that they can -do so in accordance alike with adequate authority and with the -sacredness of truth. Many will be unable to escape the opinion that -they bear some resemblance to other Jewish haggadoth, written for -edification, with every innocent intention, in the schools of the -Prophets, but no more intended for perfectly literal acceptance in all -their details than the Life of St. Paul the Hermit, by St. Jerome; or -that of St. Antony, attributed erroneously to St. Athanasius; or that -of St. Francis in the Fioretti; or the lives of humble saints of the -people called _Kisar-el-anbiah_, which are so popular among poor -Mohammedans. Into that question there is no need to enter further. -_Abundet quisque in sensu suo._ - -I. On one occasion a widow of one of the Sons of the Prophets--for -these communities, though coenobitic, were not celibate--came to him -in deep distress. Her husband--the Jews, with their usual guesswork, -most improbably identify him with Obadiah, the chamberlain of -Ahab[65]--had died insolvent. As she had nothing to pay, her creditor -under the grim provision of the law was about to exercise his right of -selling her two sons into slavery to recoup himself for the debt.[66] -Would Elisha help her? - -Prophets were never men of wealth, so that he could not pay her debt. He -asked her what she possessed to satisfy the demand. "Nothing," she said, -"but a pot of the common oil, used for anointing the body after a bath." - -Elisha bade her go and borrow from her neighbours all the empty -vessels she could, then to return home, shut the door, and pour the -oil into the vessels. - -She did so. They were all filled, and she asked her son to bring yet -another. But there was not another to be had, so she went out and told -the Man of God. He bade her sell the miraculously multiplied oil to -pay the debt, and live with her sons on the proceeds of what was over. - -II. We next find Elisha at Shunem, famous as the abode of the fair -maiden--probably Abishag, the nurse of David's decrepitude--who is the -heroine of the Song of Songs. It is a village, now called Solam, on the -slopes of Little Hermon (Jebel-el-Duhy), three miles north of Jezreel. -At this place there lived a lady of wealth and influence, whose husband -owned the surrounding land. There were but few khans in Palestine, and -even where they now exist the traveller has in most cases to supply his -own food. Elisha, in his journeys to and fro among the schools of the -Prophets, had often enjoyed the welcome hospitality eagerly pressed -upon him by the lady of Shunem. Struck with his sacred character, she -persuaded her husband to take a step unusual even to the boundless -hospitality of the East. She begged him to do honour to this holy Man of -God by building for him a little chamber (_alyah_) on the flat roof of -the house, to which he might have easy and private access by the outside -staircase.[67] The chamber was built, and furnished, like any other -simple Eastern room, with a bed, a divan to sit on, a table, and a lamp; -and there the weary prophet on his journeys often found a peaceful, -simple, and delightful resting-place. - -Grateful for the reverence with which she treated him, and the kind -care with which she had supplied his needs, Elisha was anxious to -recompense her in whatever way might be possible. The thought of money -payment was of course out of the question: merely to hint at it would -have been a breach of manners. But perhaps he might be of use to her -in some other way. At this time, and for years afterwards during his -long ministry of perhaps fifty-six years, he was attended by a servant -named Gehazi, who stood to him in the same sort of relation which he -had held to Elijah. He told Gehazi to summon the Shunammite lady. In -the deep humility of Eastern womanhood she came and stood in his -presence. Even then he did not address her. So downtrodden was the -position of women in the East that any dignified person, much more a -great prophet, could not converse with a woman without compromising -his dignity. The more scrupulous Pharisees in the days of Christ -always carefully gathered up their garments in the streets, lest they -should so much as touch a woman with their skirts in passing by, as -the modern Chakams in Jerusalem do to this day.[68] The disciples -themselves, sophisticated by familiarity with such teachers, were -astonished that Jesus at the well of Shechem should talk with a -woman.[69] So, though the lady stood there, Elisha, instead of -speaking to her directly, told Gehazi to thank her for all the devout -respect and care, all 'the modesty of fearful duty,'[70] which she had -displayed towards them, and to ask her if he should say a good word -for her to the King or the Captain of the Host. This is just the sort -of favour which an Eastern would be likely to value most.[71] The -Shunammite, however, was well provided for; she had nothing to -complain of, and nothing to request. She thanked Elisha for his kindly -proposal, but declined it, and went away. - -"Is there, then, nothing which we can do for her?" asked Elisha of -Gehazi.[72] - -There was. Gehazi had learnt that the sorrow of her life--a sorrow and -a source of reproach to any Eastern household, but most of all to that -of a wealthy householder--was her childlessness. - -"Call her," he said. - -She came back, and stood reverently in the doorway. "When the time -comes round," he said to her, "you shall embrace a son." - -The promise raised in her heart a thrill of joy. It was too precious -to be believed. "Nay," she said "my lord, thou Man of God, do not lie -unto thine handmaid." - -But the promise was fulfilled, and the lady of Shunem became the happy -mother of a son. - -III. The charming episode then passes over some years. The child had -grown into a little boy, old enough now to go out alone to see his -father in the harvest fields and to run about among the reapers. But as -he played about in the heat he had a sunstroke, and cried to his father, -"O my head, my head!" Not knowing how serious the matter was, his father -simply ordered one of his lads to carry the child home to his mother. -The fond mother nursed him tenderly upon her knees, but at noon he died. - -Then the lady of Shunem showed all the faith and strength and wisdom of -her character. "The good Shunammite," says Bishop Hall, "had lost her -son; her faith she lost not." Overwhelming as was this calamity--the -loss of an only child--she suppressed all her emotions, and, instead of -bursting into the wild helpless wail of Eastern mourners, or rushing to -her husband with the agonising news, she took the little boy's body in -her arms, carried it up to the chamber which had been built for Elisha, -and laid it upon his bed. Then, shutting the door, she called to her -husband to send to her one of his reapers and one of the asses, for she -was going quickly to the Man of God and would return in the cool of the -evening. "Why should you go to-day particularly?" he asked. "It is -neither new moon, nor sabbath." "It is all right," she said;[73] and -with perfect confidence in the rectitude of all her purposes, he sent -her the she-ass, and a servant to drive it and to run beside it for her -protection on the journey of sixteen miles. - -"Drive on the ass," she said. "Slacken me not the riding unless I tell -you." So with all possible speed she made her way--a journey of -several hours--from Shunem to Mount Carmel. - -Elisha, from his retreat on the hill, marked her coming from a -distance, and it rendered him anxious. "Here comes the Shunammite," he -said to Gehazi. "Run to meet her, and ask Is it well with thee? is it -well with thy husband? is it well with the child?" - -"All well," she answered, for her message was not to Gehazi, and she -could not trust her voice to speak; but pressing on up-hillwards, she -flung herself before Elisha and grasped his feet. Displeased at the -familiarity which dared thus to clasp the feet of his master, Gehazi ran -up to thrust her away by force, but Elisha interfered. "Let her alone," -he cried; "she is in deep affliction, and Jehovah has not revealed to me -the cause." Then her long pent-up emotion burst forth. "Did I desire a -son of my lord?" she cried. "Did I not say do not deceive me?" - -It was enough--though she seemed unable to bring out the dreadful -words that her boy was dead. Catching her meaning, Elisha said to -Gehazi, "Gird up thy loins, take my staff, and without so much as -stopping to salute any one, or to return a salutation,[74] lay my -staff on the dead child's face." But the broken-hearted mother -refused to leave Elisha. She imagined that the servant, the staff, -might be severed from Elisha; but she knew that wherever the prophet -was, there was power. So Elisha arose and followed her, and on the way -Gehazi met them with the news that the child lay still and dead, with -the fruitless staff upon his face. - -Then Elisha in deep anguish went up to the chamber and shut the door, -and saw the boy's body lying pale upon his bed. After earnest prayer -he outstretched himself over the little corpse, as Elijah had done at -Zarephath. Soon it began to grow warm with returning life, and Elisha, -after pacing up and down the room, once more stretched himself over -him. Then the child opened his eyes and sneezed seven times, and -Elisha called to Gehazi to summon the mother. - -"Take up thy son," he said. She prostrated herself at his feet in -speechless gratitude, and took up her recovered child, and went. - -IV. We next find Elisha at Gilgal, in the time of the famine of which -we read his prediction in a later chapter.[75] The sons of the -prophets were seated round him, listening to his instructions; the -hour came for their simple meal, and he ordered the great pot to be -put on the fire for the vegetable soup, on which, with bread, they -chiefly lived. One of them went out for herbs, and carelessly brought -his outer garment (the _abeyah_)[76] full of wild poisonous -coloquinths,[77] which, by ignorance or inadvertence, were shred into -the pottage. But when it was cooked and poured out they perceived the -poisonous taste, and cried out, "O Man of God, death in the pot!" - -"Bring meal," he said, for he seems always to have been a man of the -fewest words. - -They cast in some meal, and were all able to eat of the now harmless -pottage. It has been noticed that in this, as in other incidents of -the story, there is no invocation of the name of Jehovah. - -V. Not far from Gilgal was the little village of Baalshalisha,[78] at -which lived a farmer who wished to bring an offering of firstfruits -and _karmel_ (bruised grain) in his wallet to Elisha as a Man of -God.[79] It was a poor gift enough--only twenty of the coarse barley -loaves which were eaten by the common people, and a sack[80] full of -fresh ears of corn.[81] Elisha told his servitor[82]--perhaps -Gehazi--to set them before the people present. "What?" he asked, "this -trifle of food before a hundred men!" But Elisha told him in the -Lord's name that it should more than suffice; and so it did. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[65] Jos., _Antt._, IX. iv. 2. This perhaps is only suggested by the -reminiscences of 1 Kings xviii. 2, 3, 12. - -[66] Lev. xxv. 39-41; Matt. xviii. 25. - -[67] 2 Kings iv. 10. Not "a little chamber on the wall" (A.V.), but -"an _alyah_ with walls" (margin, R.V.). - -[68] Frankl., _Jews in the East_. - -[69] John iv. 27: "Then came His disciples, and marvelled that He was -_talking_ ([Greek: meta gunaikos]) _with a woman_." - -[70] 2 Kings iv. 13: "Behold, thou hast been careful for us with all -this care" (LXX., [Greek: pasan tn ekstasin tautn]). - -[71] The Sheykh with whom I stayed at Bint es Jebeil could think of no -return which I could offer for his hospitality so acceptable as if I -would say a good word for him to the authorities at Beyrout. - -[72] Gehazi is usually called the _na'ar_ or "lad" of Elisha--a term -implying lower service than Elisha's "ministry" to Elijah. - -[73] 2 Kings iv. 23. Hebrew "Peace"; A.V., "It shall be well." - -[74] Salutations occupy some time in the formally courteous East. -Comp. Luke x. 4. - -[75] 2 Kings viii. 1. - -[76] Not "lap," as in A. V. (Heb., _beged_); LXX. [Greek: synelixe -plres to himation autou]; Vulg., _implevit vestem suam_ (both -correctly). - -[77] Heb., _paquoth_; LXX., [Greek: tolypn agrian]; Vulg; -_colocynthidas agri_. Hence the name _cucumis prophetarum_. - -[78] Lord of the Chain and "Three lands." Three wadies meet at this -spot, a little west of Bethel. - -[79] 2 Kings iv. 42. Karmel, Lev. ii. 14. Perhaps a sort of frumenty. - -[80] The word for "wallet" (_tsiqlon_; Vulg., _pera_) occurs here -only. Peshito, "garment." The Vatican LXX. omits it. The Greek version -has [Greek: en kryk autou]. - -[81] See Lev. ii. 14, xxiii. 14. - -[82] 2 Kings iv. 43. The word for "his servitor" (_m'chartho_) is used -also of Joshua. It does not mean a mere ordinary attendant. LXX., -[Greek: leitourgos]; Vulg., _minister_. - - - - - CHAPTER VI - - _THE STORY OF NAAMAN_ - - 2 KINGS v. 1-27 - - MATT. viii. 3: [Greek: Thel, katharisthti] - - -After these shorter anecdotes we have the longer episode of Naaman.[83] - -A part of the misery inflicted by the Syrians on Israel was caused by -the forays in which their light-armed bands, very much like the -borderers on the marches of Wales or Scotland, descended upon the -country and carried off plunder and captives before they could be -pursued. - -In one of these raids they had seized a little Israelitish girl and -sold her to be a slave. She had been purchased for the household of -Naaman, the captain of the Syrian host, who had helped his king and -nation to win important victories either against Israel or against -Assyria. Ancient Jewish tradition identified him with the man who had -"drawn his bow at a venture" and slain King Ahab. But all Naaman's -valour and rank and fame, and the honour felt for him by his king, -were valueless to him, for he was suffering from the horrible -affliction of leprosy. Lepers do not seem to have been segregated in -other countries so strictly as they were in Israel, or at any rate -Naaman's leprosy was not of so severe a form as to incapacitate him -from his public functions. - -But it was evident that he was a man who had won the affection of all -who knew him; and the little slave girl who waited on his wife -breathed to her a passionate wish that Naaman could visit the Man of -God in Samaria, for he would recover him from his leprosy. The saying -was repeated, and one of Naaman's friends mentioned it to the king of -Syria. Benhadad was so much struck by it that he instantly determined -to send a letter, with a truly royal gift to the king of Israel, who -could, he supposed, as a matter of course, command the services of the -prophet. The letter came to Jehoram with a stupendous present of -ingots of silver to the value of ten talents, and six thousand pieces -of gold, and ten changes of raiment.[84] After the ordinary -salutations, and a mention of the gifts, the letter continued "And -now, when this letter is come to thee, behold I have sent Naaman my -servant, that thou mayest recover him of his leprosy." - -Jehoram lived in perpetual terror of his powerful and encroaching -neighbour. Nothing was said in the letter about the Man of God; and -the king rent his clothes, exclaiming that he was not God to kill and -to make alive, and that this must be a base pretext for a quarrel. It -never so much as occurred to him, as it certainly would have done to -Jehoshaphat, that the prophet, who was so widely known and honoured, -and whose mission had been so clearly attested in the invasion of -Moab, might at least help him to face this problem. Otherwise the -difficulty might indeed seem insuperable, for leprosy was universally -regarded as an incurable disease. - -But Elisha was not afraid: he boldly told Jehoram to send the Syrian -captain to him. Naaman, with his horses and his chariots, in all the -splendour of a royal ambassador, drove up to the humble house of the -prophet. Being so great a man, he expected a deferential reception, -and looked for the performance of his cure in some striking and -dramatic manner. "The prophet," so he said to himself, "will come out, -and solemnly invoke the name of his God Jehovah, and wave his hand -over the leprous limbs, and so work the miracle."[85] - -But the servant of the King of kings was not exultantly impressed, as -false prophets so often are, by earthly greatness. Elisha did not even -pay him the compliment of coming out of the house to meet him. He -wished to efface himself completely, and to fix the leper's thoughts -on the one truth that if healing was granted to him, it was due to the -gift of God, not to the thaumaturgy or arts of man. He simply sent out -his servant to the Syrian commander-in-chief with the brief message, -"Go and wash in Jordan seven times, and be thou clean." - -Naaman, accustomed to the extreme deference of many dependants, was not -only offended, but enraged, by what he regarded as the scant courtesy -and procrastinated boon of the prophet. Why was he not received as a man -of the highest distinction? What necessity could there be for sending -him all the way to the Jordan? And why was he bidden to wash in that -wretched, useless, tortuous stream, rather than in the pure and flowing -waters of his own native Abanah and Pharpar?[86] How was he to tell that -this "Man of God" did not design to mock him by sending him on a fool's -errand, so that he would come back as a laughing-stock both to the -Israelites and to his own people? Perhaps he had not felt any great -faith in the prophet, to begin with; but whatever he once felt had now -vanished. He turned and went away in a rage. - -But in this crisis the affection of his friends and servants stood him -in good stead. Addressing him, in their love and pity, by the unusual -term of honour "my father," they urged upon him that, as he certainly -would not have refused some _great_ test, there was no reason why he -should refuse this simple and humble one. - -He was won over by their reasonings, and descending the hot steep valley -of the Jordan, bathed himself in the river seven times. God healed him, -and, as Elisha had promised, "his flesh," corroded by leprosy, "came -again like the flesh of a little child, and he was clean." - -This healing of Naaman is alluded to by our Lord to illustrate the truth -that the love of God extended farther than the limits of the chosen -race; that His Fatherhood is co-extensive with the whole family of man. - -It is difficult to conceive the transport of a man cured of this most -loathsome and humiliating of all earthly afflictions. Naaman, who seems -to have possessed "a mind naturally Christian," was filled with -gratitude. Unlike the thankless Jewish lepers whom Christ cured as He -left Engannim, this alien returned to give glory to God. Once more the -whole imposing cavalcade rode through the streets of Samaria, and -stopped at Elisha's door. This time Naaman was admitted into his -presence. He saw, and no doubt Elisha had strongly impressed on him the -truth, that his healing was the work not of man but of God; and as he -had found no help in the deities of Syria, he confessed that the God of -Israel was the only true God among those of the nations. In token of his -thankfulness he presses Elisha, as God's instrument in the unspeakable -mercy which has been granted to him, to accept "a blessing" (_i.e._, a -present) from him--"from thy servant," as he humbly styled himself. - -Elisha was no greedy Balaam. It was essential that Naaman and the -Syrians should not look on him as on some vulgar sorcerer who wrought -wonders for "the rewards of divination." His wants were so simple that -he stood above temptation. His desires and treasures were not on -earth. To put an end to all importunity, he appealed to Jehovah with -his usual solemn formula--"As the Lord liveth before whom I stand, I -will receive no present."[87] - -Still more deeply impressed by the prophet's incorruptible superiority -to so much as a suspicion of low motives, Naaman asked that he might -receive two mules' burden of earth wherewith to build an altar to the -God of Israel of His own sacred soil.[88] The very soil ruled by such -a God must, he thought, be holier than other soil; and he wished to -take it back to Syria, just as the people of Pisa rejoiced to fill -their Campo Santo with mould from the Holy Land, and just as mothers -like to baptize their children in water brought home from the Jordan. -Henceforth, said Naaman, I will offer burnt-offering and sacrifice to -no God but unto Jehovah. Yet there was one difficulty in the way. When -the King of Syria went to worship in the temple of his god Rimmon it -was the duty of Naaman to accompany him.[89] The king leaned on his -hand, and when he bowed before the idol it was Naaman's duty to bow -also. He begged that for this concession God would pardon him. - -Elisha's answer was perhaps different from what Elijah might have given. -He practically allowed Naaman to give this sign of outward compliance -with idolatry, by saying to him, "Go in peace." It is from this -circumstance that the phrase "to bow in the house of Rimmon" has become -proverbial to indicate a dangerous and dishonest compromise. But -Elisha's permission must not be misunderstood. He did but hand over this -semi-heathen convert to the grace of God. It must be remembered that he -lived in days long preceding the conviction that proselytism is a part -of true religion; in days when the thought of missions to heathen lands -was utterly unknown. The position of Naaman was wholly different from -that of any Israelite. He was only the convert, or the half-convert of -a day, and though he acknowledged the supremacy of Jehovah as alone -worthy of his worship, he probably shared in the belief--common even in -Israel--that there were other gods, local gods, gods of the nations, to -whom Jehovah might have divided the limits of their power.[90] To demand -of one who, like Naaman, had been an idolater all his days, the sudden -abandonment of every custom and tradition of his life, would have been -to demand from him an unreasonable, and, in his circumstances, useless -and all but impossible self-sacrifice. The best way was to let him feel -and see for himself the futility of Rimmon-worship. If he were not -frightened back from his sudden faith in Jehovah, the scruple of -conscience which he already felt in making his request might naturally -grow within him and lead him to all that was best and highest. The -temporary condonation of an imperfection might be a wise step towards -the ultimate realisation of a truth. We cannot at all blame Elisha, if, -with such knowledge as he then possessed, he took a mercifully tolerant -view of the exigencies of Naaman's position. The bowing in the house of -Rimmon under such conditions probably seemed to him no more than an act -of outward respect to the king and to the national religion in a case -where no evil results could follow from Naaman's example.[91] - -But the general principle that _we_ must _not_ bow in the house of -Rimmon remains unchanged. The light and knowledge vouchsafed to us far -transcend those which existed in times when men had not seen the days of -the Son of Man. The only rule which sincere Christians can follow is to -have no truce with Canaan, no halting between two opinions, no -tampering, no compliance, no connivance, no complicity with evil,--even -no tolerance of evil as far as their own conduct is concerned. No good -man, in the light of the Gospel dispensation, could condone himself in -seeming to sanction--still less in doing--anything which in his opinion -ought not to be done, or in saying anything which implied his own -acquiescence in things which he knows to be evil. "Sir," said a -parishioner to one of the non-juring clergy: "there is many a man who -has made a great gash in his conscience; cannot you make a little nick -in yours?" No! a _little_ nick is, in one sense, as fatal as a great -gash. It is an abandonment of _the principle_; it is a violation of the -Law. The wrong of it consists in this--that all evil begins, not in the -commission of great crimes, but in the slight divergence from right -rules. The angle made by two lines may be infinitesimally small, but -produce the lines and it may require infinitude to span the separation -between the lines which inclose so tiny an angle. The wise man gave the -only true rule about wrong-doing, when he said, "Enter not into the path -of the wicked and go not in the way of evil men. Avoid it, pass not by -it, turn from it and pass away."[92] And the reason for his rule is -that the beginning of sin--like the beginning of strife--"is as when one -letteth out water."[93] - -The proper answer to all abuses of any supposed concession to the -lawfulness of bowing in the house of Rimmon--if that be interpreted to -mean the doing of anything which our consciences cannot wholly -approve--is _Obsta principiis_--avoid the beginnings of evil. - - "We are not worst at once; the course of evil - Begins so slowly, and from such slight source, - An infant's hand might stem the breach with clay; - But let the stream grow wider, and philosophy, - Age, and religion too, may strive in vain - To stem the headstrong current." - -The mean cupidity of Gehazi, the servant of Elisha, gives a deplorable -sequel to the story of the prophet's magnanimity. This man's wretched -greed did its utmost to nullify the good influence of his master's -example. There may be more wicked acts recorded in Scripture than that -of Gehazi, but there is scarcely one which shows so paltry a -disposition. - -He had heard the conversation between his master and the Syrian -marshal, and his cunning heart despised as a futile sentimentality the -magnanimity which had refused an eagerly proffered reward. Naaman was -rich: he had received a priceless boon; it would be rather a pleasure -to him than otherwise to return for it some acknowledgment which he -would not miss. Had he not even seemed a little hurt by Elisha's -refusal to receive it? What possible harm could there be in taking -what he was anxious to give? And how useful those magnificent presents -would be, and to what excellent uses could they be put! He could not -approve of the fantastic and unpractical scrupulosity which had led -Elisha to refuse the "blessing" which he had so richly earned. Such -attitudes of unworldliness seemed entirely foolish to Gehazi. - -So pleaded the Judas-spirit within the man. By such specious delusions -he inflamed his own covetousness, and fostered the evil temptation -which had taken sudden and powerful hold upon his heart, until it took -shape in a wicked resolve. - -The mischief of Elisha's quixotic refusal was done, but it could be -speedily undone, and no one would be the worse. The evil spirit was -whispering to Gehazi:-- - - "Be mine and Sin's for one short hour; and then - Be all thy life the happiest man of men." - -"Behold," he said, with some contempt both for Elisha and for Naaman, -"my master hath let off this Naaman the Syrian; but as the Lord liveth -I will run after him, and take somewhat of him." - -"As the Lord liveth!" It had been a favourite appeal of Elijah and -Elisha, and the use of it by Gehazi shows how utterly meaningless and -how very dangerous such solemn words become when they are degraded -into formul.[94] It is thus that the habit of swearing begins. The -light use of holy words very soon leads to their utter degradation. -How keen is the satire in Cowper's little story:-- - - "A Persian, humble servant of the sun, - Who, though devout, yet bigotry had none, - Hearing a lawyer, grave in his address, - With adjurations every word impress,-- - Supposed the man a bishop, or, at least, - God's Name so often on his lips--a priest. - Bowed at the close with all his gracious airs, - And begged an interest in his frequent prayers!" - - -Had Gehazi felt their true meaning--had he realised that on Elisha's -lips they meant something infinitely more real than on his own, he -would not have forgotten that in Elisha's answer to Naaman they had -all the validity of an oath, and that he was inflicting on his master -a shameful wrong, when he led Naaman to believe that, after so sacred -an adjuration, the prophet had frivolously changed his mind. - -Gehazi had not very far to run,[95] for in a country full of hills, -and of which the roads are rough, horses and chariots advance but -slowly. Naaman, chancing to glance backwards, saw the prophet's -attendant running after him. Anticipating that he must be the bearer -of some message from Elisha, he not only halted the cavalcade, but -sprang down from his chariot,[96] and went to meet him with the -anxious question, "Is all well?" - -"Well," answered Gehazi; and then had ready his cunning lie. "Two -youths," he said, "of the prophetic schools had just unexpectedly come -to his master from the hill country of Ephraim; and though he would -accept nothing for himself, Elisha would be glad if Naaman would spare -him two changes of garments, and one talent of silver for these poor -members of a sacred calling."[97] - -Naaman must have been a little more or a little less than human if he -did not feel a touch of disappointment on hearing this message. The gift -was nothing to him. It was a delight to him to give it, if only to -lighten a little the burden of gratitude which he felt towards his -benefactor. But if he had felt elevated by the magnanimous example of -Elisha's disinterestedness, he must have thought that this hasty request -pointed to a little regret on the prophet's part for his noble -self-denial. After all, then, even prophets were but men, and gold after -all was gold! The change of mind about the gift brought Elisha a little -nearer the ordinary level of humanity, and, so far, it acted as a sort -of disenchantment from the high ideal exhibited by his former refusal. -And so Naaman said, with alacrity, "Be content: take two talents." - -The fact that Gehazi's conduct thus inevitably compromised his master, -and undid the effects of his example, is part of the measure of the -man's apostacy. It showed how false and hypocritical was his position, -how unworthy he was to be the ministering servant of a prophet. Elisha -was evidently deceived in the man altogether. The heinousness of his -guilt lies in the words _Corruptio optimi pessima_. When religion is -used for a cloak of covetousness, of usurping ambition, of secret -immorality, it becomes deadlier than infidelity. Men raze the -sanctuary, and build their idol temples on the hallowed ground. They -cover their base encroachments and impure designs with the "cloke of -profession, doubly lined with the fox-fur of hypocrisy," and hide the -leprosy which is breaking out upon their foreheads with the golden -_petalon_ on which is inscribed the title of "holiness to the Lord." - -At first Gehazi did not like to take so large a sum as two talents; -but the crime was already committed, and there was not much more harm -done in taking two talents than in taking one. Naaman urged him, and -it is very improbable that, unless the chances of detection weighed -with him, he needed much urging. So the Syrian weighed out silver -ingots to the amount of two talents, and putting them in two satchels -laid them on two of his servants and told them to carry the money -before Gehazi to Elisha's house. But Gehazi had to keep a look-out -lest his nefarious dealings should be observed, and when they came to -Ophel--the word means the foot of the hill of Samaria, or some part of -the fortifications[98]--he took the bags from the two Syrians, -dismissed them, and carried the money to some place where he could -conceal it in the house. Then, as though nothing had happened, with -his usual smooth face of sanctimonious integrity, the pious Jesuit -went and stood before his master. - -He had not been unnoticed! His heart must have sunk within him when -there smote upon his ear Elisha's question,-- - -"Whence comest thou, Gehazi?" - -But one lie is as easy as another, and Gehazi was doubtless an adept -at lying. - -"Thy servant went no whither," he replied, with an air of innocent -surprise. - -"_Went not_ my beloved one?"[99] said Elisha--and he must have said it -with a groan, as he thought how utterly unworthy the youth, whom he -thus called "my loving heart" or "my dear friend,"--"when the man -turned from his chariot to meet thee?" It may be that from the hill -of Samaria Elisha had seen it all, or that he had been told by one who -had seen it. If not, he had been rightly led to read the secret of his -servant's guilt. "Is it a time," he asked, "to act thus?" Did not my -example show thee that there was a high object in refusing this -Syrian's gifts, and in leading him to feel that the servants of -Jehovah do His bidding with no afterthought of sordid considerations? -Are there not enough troubles about us actual and impending, to show -that this is no time for the accumulation of earthly treasures? Is it -a time to receive money--and all that money will procure? to receive -garments, and olive-yards and vineyards, and oxen, and men-servants -and maid-servants? Has a prophet no higher aim than the accumulation -of earthly goods, and are his needs such as earthly goods can supply? -And hast thou, the daily friend and attendant of a prophet, learnt so -little from his precepts and his example? - -Then followed the tremendous penalty for so grievous a -transgression--a transgression made up of meanness, irreverence, -greed, cheating, treachery, and lies. - -"The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy -seed for ever!" "Oh heavy talents of Gehazi!" exclaims Bishop Hall: -"Oh the horror of the one unchangeable suit! How much better had been -a light purse and a homely coat, with a sound body and a clean soul!" - -"And he went out from his presence a leper as white as snow."[100] - -It is the characteristic of the leprous taint in the system to be thus -suddenly developed, and apparently in crises of sudden and -overpowering emotion it might affect the whole blood. And one of the -many morals which lie in Gehazi's story is again that moral to which -the world's whole experience sets its seal--that though the guilty -soul may sell itself for a desired price, the sum-total of that price -is nought. It is Achan's ingots buried under the sod on which stood -his tent. It is Naboth's vineyard made abhorrent to Ahab on the day he -entered it. It is the thirty pieces of silver which Judas dashed with -a shriek upon the Temple floor. It is Gehazi's leprosy for which no -silver talents or changes of raiment could atone. - -The story of Gehazi--of the son of the prophets who would naturally -have succeeded Elisha as Elisha had succeeded Elijah--must have had a -tremendous significance to warn the members of the prophetic schools -from the peril of covetousness. That peril, as all history proves to -us, is one from which popes and priests, monks, and even nominally -ascetic and nominally pauper communities, have never been exempt;--to -which, it may even be said, that they have been peculiarly liable. -Mercenariness and falsity, displayed under the pretence of religion, -were never more overwhelmingly rebuked. Yet, as the Rabbis said, it -would have been better if Elisha, in repelling with the left hand, had -also drawn with the right.[101] - - * * * * * - -The fine story of Elisha and Naaman, and the fall and punishment of -Gehazi, is followed by one of the anecdotes of the prophet's life -which appears to our unsophisticated, perhaps to our imperfectly -enlightened judgment, to rise but little above the ecclesiastical -portents related in medival hagiologies. - -At some unnamed place--perhaps Jericho--the house of the Sons of the -Prophets had become too small for their numbers and requirements, and -they asked Elisha's leave to go down to the Jordan and cut beams to make -a new residence. Elisha gave them leave, and at their request consented -to go with them. While they were hewing, the axe-head of one of them -fell into the water, and he cried out, "Alas! master, it was borrowed!" -Elisha ascertained where it had fallen. He then cut down a stick,[102] -and cast it on the spot, and the iron swam and the man recovered it. - -The story is perhaps an imaginative reproduction of some unwonted -incident. At any rate, we have no sufficient evidence to prove that it -may not be so. It is wholly unlike the economy invariably shown in the -Scripture narratives which tell us of the exercise of supernatural -power. All the eternal laws of nature are here superseded at a word, as -though it were an every-day matter, without even any recorded invocation -of Jehovah, to restore an axe-head, which could obviously have been -recovered or resupplied in some much less stupendous way than by making -iron swim on the surface of a swift-flowing river. It is easy to invent -conventional and _ priori_ apologies to show that religion demands the -unquestioning acceptance of this prodigy, and that a man must be -shockingly wicked who does not feel certain that it happened exactly in -the literal sense; but whether the doubt or the defence be morally -worthier, is a thing which God alone can judge.[103] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[83] It is curiously omitted by Josephus, though he mentions him -([Greek: Amanos]) as the slayer of Ahab (_Antt._, VIII. xv. 5). The -name is an old Hebrew name (Num. xxvi. 40). - -[84] The word _l'boosh_ means a gala dress. Comp. v. 5; Gen. xlv. 22. -[Greek: chitnes epmoiboi] (Hom., _Od._, xiv. 514). Comp. viii. 249. - -[85] Elisha would not be likely to _touch_ the place. - -[86] Now the _Burda_ ("cold") and the Nahr-el-Awj. - -[87] Compare the answer of Abraham to the King of Sodom (Gen. xiv. 23). - -[88] The feeling which influenced Naaman is the same which led the Jews -to build Nahardea in Persia of stones from Jerusalem. Altars were to be -of earth (Exod. xx. 24), but no altar is mentioned in 2 Kings v. 17, and -the LXX. does not even specify _earth_ ([Greek: gomos zeugos hmionn]). - -[89] This is the only place in Scripture where Rimmon is mentioned, -though we have the name Tab-Rimmon ("Rimmon is good"), 1 Kings xv. 18, -and Hadad-Rimmon (Zech. xii. 11). He was the god of the thunder. The -word means "pomegranate," and some have fancied that this was one of -his symbols. But the resemblance may be accidental, and the name was -properly _Ramman_. - -[90] See Deut. xxxii. 8, where the LXX. has [Greek: kata arithmon -angeln]. - -[91] The moral difficulty must have been early felt, for the -Alexandrian LXX. reads [Greek: kai proskyns ama aut eg Kuri t -The mou]. But he would still be bowing in the House of Rimmon, though -he might in his heart worship God. "Elisha, like Elijah" (says Dean -Stanley), "made no effort to set right what had gone so wrong. Their -mission was to make the best of what they found; not to bring back a -rule of religion which had passed away, but to dwell on the Moral Law -which could be fulfilled everywhere, not on the Ceremonial Law which -circumstances seemed to have put out of their reach: 'not sending the -Shunammite to Jerusalem' (says Cardinal Newman), 'not eager for a -proselyte in Naaman, yet making the heathen fear the Name of God, and -proving to them that there was a prophet in Israel'" (Stanley, -_Lectures_, ii. 377; Newman, _Sermons_, viii. 415). - -[92] Prov. iv. 14, 15. - -[93] Prov. xvii. 14. - -[94] On Gehazi's lips it meant no more than the incessant _Wallah_, -"by God," of Mohammedans. - -[95] 2 Kings v. 19. Heb., _kib'rath aretz_, "a little way"--literally, -"a space of country." (The Vatican LXX. follows another reading, -[Greek: eis Debratha ts gs]; Vulg., _electo terr tempore_[?].) - -[96] LXX., [Greek: katepdsen]. - -[97] A talent of silver was worth about 400--an enormous sum for two -half-naked youths. - -[98] 2 Kings v. 24. The LXX. ([Greek: eis to skoteinon]) seems to have -read [Hebrew: 'ofel] (_ophel_); "darkness," a treasury or secret -place, for [Hebrew: tzofel], and so the Vulgate _jam vesperi_. - -[99] 2 Kings v. 26. The verse is so interpreted by some critics, -especially Ewald, followed by Stanley. Margin, R.V.: "Mine heart went -not from me, when" etc. - -[100] Exod. iv. 6; Num. xii. 10. - -[101] The later Rabbis thought that Elisha was too severe with Gehazi, -and was punished with sickness because "he repelled him with both his -hands" (_Bava-Metsia_, f. 87, 1, and _Yalkut Jeremiah_). - -[102] The Hebrew word for "cut off" (_qatsab_) is very rare. LXX., -[Greek: apeknise xylon]; Vulg., _prcidit lignum_. - -[103] It must be further borne in mind that "the iron did swim" (A.V.) -is less accurate than "made the iron to swim" (R.V.). The LXX. has -[Greek: epepolase], "brought to the surface." Von Gerlach says, "He -thrust the stick into the water, and raised the iron to the surface." - - - - - CHAPTER VII - - _ELISHA AND THE SYRIANS_ - - 2 KINGS vi. 1-23 - - "Now there was found in the city a poor wise man, and he by his - wisdom delivered the city."--ECCLES. ix. 15. - - -Elisha, unlike his master Elijah, was, during a great part of his long -career, intimately mixed up with the political and military fortunes -of his country. The king of Israel who occurs in the following -narratives is left nameless--always the sign of later and more vague -tradition; but he has usually been identified with Jehoram ben-Ahab, -and, though not without some misgivings, we shall assume that the -identification is correct. His dealings with Elisha never seem to have -been very cordial, though on one occasion he calls him "my father." -The relations between them at times became strained and even stormy. - -His reign was rendered miserable by the incessant infestation of Syrian -marauders. In these difficulties he was greatly helped by Elisha. The -prophet repeatedly frustrated the designs of the Syrian king by -revealing to Jehoram the places of Benhadad's ambuscades, so that -Jehoram could change the destination of his hunting parties or other -movements, and escape the plots laid to seize his person. Benhadad, -finding himself thus frustrated, and suspecting that it was due to -treachery, called his servants together in grief and indignation, and -asked who was the traitor among them. His officers assured him that they -were all faithful, but that the secrets whispered in his bed-chamber -were revealed to Jehoram by Elisha the prophet in Israel, whose fame had -spread into Syria, perhaps because of the cure of Naaman. The king, -unable to take any step while his counsels were thus published to his -enemies, thought--not very consistently--that he could surprise and -seize Elisha himself, and sent to find out where he was. At that time he -was living in Dothan, about twelve miles north-east of Samaria,[104] and -Benhadad sent a contingent with horses and chariots by night to surround -the city, and prevent any escape from its gates. That he could thus -besiege a town so near the capital shows the helplessness to which -Israel had been now reduced. - -When Elisha's servitor rose in the morning he was terrified to see the -Syrians encamped round the city, and cried to Elisha, "Alas! my -master, what shall we do?" - -"Fear not," said the prophet: "they that be with us are more than they -that be with them." He prayed God to grant the youth the same open eyes, -the same spiritual vision which he himself enjoyed; and the youth saw -the mountain full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha. - -This incident has been full of comfort to millions, as a beautiful -illustration of the truth that-- - - "The hosts of God encamp around - The dwellings of the just; - Deliverance He affords to all - Who on His promise trust. - - "Oh, make but trial of His love, - Experience will decide, - How blest are they, and only they, - Who in His truth confide." - -The youth's affectionate alarm had not been shared by his master. He -knew that to every true servant of God the promise will be fulfilled, -"He shall defend thee under His wings; thou shalt be safe under His -feathers; His righteousness and truth shall be thy shield and -buckler."[105] - -Were our eyes similarly opened, we too should see the reality of the -Divine protection and providence, whether under the visible form of -angelic ministrants or not. Scripture in general, and the Psalms in -particular, are full of the serenity inspired by this conviction. The -story of Elisha is a picture-commentary on the Psalmist's words: "The -angel of the Lord encampeth round them that fear Him, and delivereth -them."[106] "He shall give His angels charge over thee, to keep thee -in all thy ways."[107] "And I will encamp about Mine house because of -the army, because of him that passeth by, and because of him that -returneth: and no oppressor shall pass through them any more: for now -have I seen with Mine eyes."[108] "The angel of His presence saved -them: in His love and in His pity He redeemed them; and He bare them, -and carried them all the days of old."[109] - -But what is the exact meaning of all these lovely promises? They do not -mean that God's children and saints will always be shielded from anguish -or defeat, from the triumph of their enemies, or even from apparently -hopeless and final failure, or miserable death. The lesson is not that -their persons shall be inviolable, or that the enemies who advance -against them to eat up their flesh shall always stumble and fall. The -experiences of tens of thousands of troubled lives and martyred ends -instantly prove the futility of any such reading of these assurances. -The saints of God, the prophets of God, have died in exile and in -prison, have been tortured on the rack and broken on the wheel, and -burnt to ashes at innumerable stakes; they have been destitute, -afflicted, tormented, in their lives--stoned, beheaded, sawn asunder, in -every form of hideous death; they have rotted in miry dungeons, have -starved on desolate shores, have sighed out their souls into the -agonising flame. The Cross of Christ stands as the emblem and the -explanation of their lives, which fools count to be madness, and their -end without honour. On earth they have, far more often than not, been -crushed by the hatred and been delivered over to the will of their -enemies. Where, then, have been those horses and chariots of fire? - -They have been there no less than around Elisha at Dothan. The eyes -spiritually opened have seen them, even when the sword flashed, or the -flames wrapped them in indescribable torment. The sense of God's -protection has least deserted His saints when to the world's eyes they -seemed to have been most utterly abandoned. There has been a joy in -prisons and at stakes, it has been said, far exceeding the joy of -harvest. "Pray for me," said a poor boy of fifteen, who was being -burned at Smithfield in the fierce days of Mary Tudor. "I would as -soon pray for a dog as for a heretic like thee," answered one of the -spectators. "Then, Son of God, shine Thou upon me!" cried the -boy-martyr; and instantly, upon a dull and cloudy day, the sun shone -out, and bathed his young face in glory; whereat, says the -martyrologist, men greatly marvelled. But is there one death-bed of a -saint on which that glory has not shone? - -The presence of those horses and chariots of fire, unseen by the -carnal eye--the promises which, if they be taken literally, all -experience seems to frustrate--mean two things, which they who are the -heirs of such promises, and who would without them be of all men most -miserable, have clearly understood. - -They mean, first, that as long as a child of God is on the path of -duty, and until that duty has been fulfilled, he is inviolable and -invulnerable. He shall tread upon the lion and the adder; the young -lion and the dragon shall he trample under his feet. He shall take up -the serpent in his hands; and if he drink any deadly thing, it shall -not hurt him. He shall not be afraid of the terror by night, nor of -the arrow that flieth by day; of the pestilence that walketh in -darkness, nor of the demon that destroyeth in the noonday. A thousand -shall fall at his right hand, and ten thousand beside him; but it -shall not come nigh him. The histories and the legends of numberless -marvellous deliverances all confirm the truth that, when a man fears -the Lord, He will keep him in all his ways, and give His angels charge -over him, lest at any time he dash his foot against a stone. God will -not permit any mortal force, or any combination of forces, to hinder -the accomplishment of the task entrusted to His servant. It is the -sense of this truth which, under circumstances however menacing, -should enable us to - - "bate no jot - Of heart or hope, but still bear up, and steer - Uphillward" - -It is this conviction which has nerved men to face insuperable -difficulties, and achieve impossible and unhoped-for ends. It works in -the spirit of the cry, "Who art thou, O great mountain? Before -Zerubbabel be thou changed into a plain!" It inspires the faith as a -grain of mustard seed which is able to say to this mountain, "Be thou -removed, and be thou cast into the sea,"--and it shall obey. It stands -unmoved upon the pinnacle of the Temple whereon it has been placed, -while the enemy and the tempter, smitten by amazement, falls. In the -hour of difficulty it can cry,-- - - "Rescue me, O Lord, in this mine evil hour, - As of old so many by Thy mighty power,-- - Enoch and Elias from the common doom; - Noe from the waters in a saving home; - Abraham from the abounding guilt of heathenesse; - Job from all his multiform and fell distress; - Isaac when his faither's knife was raised to slay; - Lot from burning Sodom on the judgment day; - Moses from the land of bondage and despair; - Daniel from the hungry lions in their lair; - And the children three amid the furnace flame; - Chaste Susanna from the slander and the shame; - David from Golia, and the wrath of Saul; - And the two Apostles from their prison-thrall." - -The strangeness, the unexpectedness, the apparently inadequate source -of the deliverance, have deepened the trust that it has not been due -to accident. Once, when Felix of Nola was flying from his enemies, he -took refuge in a cave, and he had scarcely entered it before a spider -began to spin its web over the fissure. The pursuer, passing by, saw -the spider's web, and did not look into the cave; and the saint, as he -came out into safety, remarked: "_Ubi Deus est, ibi aranea murus, ubi -non est ibi murus aranea_" ("Where God is, a spider's web is as a -wall; where He is not, a wall is but as a spider's web"). - -This is one lesson conveyed in the words of Christ when the Pharisees -told Him that Herod desired to kill Him. He knew that Herod could not -kill Him till He had done His Father's will and finished His work. "Go -ye," He said, "and tell this fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and I do -cures to-day and to-morrow, and the third day I shall be perfected. -Nevertheless, I must walk to-day, and to-morrow, and the day following." - -But had all this been otherwise--had Felix been seized by his pursuers -and perished, as has been the common lot of God's prophets and -heroes--he would not therefore have felt himself mocked by these -exceeding great and precious promises. The chariots and horses of fire -are still there, and are there to work a deliverance yet greater and -more eternal. Their office is not to deliver the perishing body, but -to carry into God's glory the immortal soul. This is indicated in the -death-scene of Elijah. This was the vision of the dying Stephen. This -was what Christian legend meant when it embellished with beautiful -incidents such scenes as the death of Polycarp. This was what led -Bunyan to write, when he describes the death of Christian, that "all -the trumpets sounded for him on the other side." When poor Captain -Allan Gardiner lay starving to death in that Antarctic isle with his -wretched companions, he yet painted on the entrance of the cave which -had sheltered them, and near to which his remains were found, a hand -pointing downward at the words, "Though He slay me, yet will I put my -trust in Him." - -There was a touch of almost joyful humour in the way in which Elisha -proceeded to use, in the present emergency, the power of Divine -deliverance. He seems to have gone out of the town and down the hill -to the Syrian captains,[110] and prayed God to send them illusion -([Greek: ablepsia]), so that they might be misled.[111] Then he boldly -said to them, "You are being deceived: you have come the wrong way, -and to the wrong city. I will take you to the man whom ye seek." The -incident reminds us of the story of Athanasius, who, when he was being -pursued on the Nile, took the opportunity of a bend of the river -boldly to turn back his boat towards Alexandria. "Do you know where -Athanasius is?" shouted the pursuers. "He is not far off!" answered -the disguised Archbishop; and the emissaries of Constantius went on in -the opposite direction from that in which he made his escape. - -Elisha led the Syrians in their delusion straight into the city of -Samaria, where they suddenly found themselves at the mercy of the king -and his troops. Delighted at so great a chance of vengeance, Jehoram -eagerly exclaimed, "My father, shall I smite, shall I smite?" - -Certainly the request cannot be regarded as unnatural, when we remember -that in the Book of Deuteronomy, which did not come to light till after -this period, we read the rule that, when the Israelites had taken a -besieged city, "thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the -sword";[112] and that when Israel defeated the Midianites[113] they slew -all the males, and Moses was wroth with the officers of the host -because they had not also slain all the women. He then (as we are told) -ordered them to slay all except the virgins, and also--horrible to -relate--"_every male among the little ones_." The spirit of Elisha on -this occasion was larger and more merciful. It almost rose to the spirit -of Him who said, "It was said to them of old time, Thou shalt love thy -neighbour and hate thine enemy; but I say unto you, Love your enemies; -forgive them that hate you; do good unto them that despitefully use you -and persecute you." He asked Jehoram reproachfully whether he would even -have smitten those whom he had taken captive with sword and bow.[114] He -not only bade the king to spare them, but to set food before them, and -send them home. Jehoram did so at great expense, and the narrative ends -by telling us that the example of such merciful generosity produced so -favourable an impression that "the bands of Syria came no more into the -land of Israel." - -It is difficult, however, to see where this statement can be -chronologically fitted in. The very next chapter--so loosely is the -compilation put together, so completely is the sequence of events here -neglected--begins with telling us that Benhadad with all his host went -up and besieged Samaria. Any peace or respite gained by Elisha's -compassionate magnanimity must, in any case, have been exceedingly -short-lived. Josephus tries to get over the difficulty by drawing a -sufficiently futile distinction between marauding bands and a direct -invasion,[115] and he says that King Benhadad gave up his frays through -_fear_ of Elisha. But, in the first place, the encompassing of Dothan -had been carried out by "_a great host_ with horses and chariots," which -is hardly consistent with the notion of a foray, though it creates new -difficulties as to the numbers whom Elisha led to Samaria; secondly, the -substitution of a direct invasion for predatory incursions would have -been no gain to Israel, but a more deadly peril; and, thirdly, if it was -fear of Elisha which stopped the king's raids, it is strange that it had -no effect in preventing his invasions. We have, however, no data for any -final solution of these problems, and it is useless to meet them with a -network of idle conjectures. Such difficulties naturally occur in -narratives so vague and unchronological as those presented to us in the -documents from the story of Elisha which the compiler wove into his -history of Israel and Judah.[116] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[104] Gen. xxxvii. 17, _Dothain_, "two wells" (?). - -[105] Psalm xci. 4. - -[106] Psalm xxxiv. 7. - -[107] Psalm xci. 11. - -[108] Zech. ix. 8. - -[109] Isa. lxiii. 9. - -[110] Adopting the reading of the Syriac version: "And when they -[Elisha and his servant] came down to them [the Syrians]." The -ordinary reading is "to _him_," which makes the narrative less clear. - -[111] 2 Kings vi. 19. [Hebrew: manverim], [Greek: aorasia], only found -in Gen. xix. 11. - -[112] Deut. xx. 13. - -[113] Num. xxxi. 7. - -[114] Vulg., _Non percuties; neque enim cepisti eos ... ut percutias._ - -[115] Jos., _Antt._, IX. iv. 4, [Greek: Krypha men ouketi ... phaners -de]. - -[116] Kittel, following Kuenen, surmises that this story has got -misplaced; that it does not belong to the days of Jehoram ben-Ahab and -Benhadad II., but to the days of Jehoahaz ben-Jehu and Benhadad III., -the son of Hazael (_Gesch. der Hebr._, 249). In a very uncertain -question I have followed the conclusion arrived at by the majority of -scholars, ancient and modern. - - - - - CHAPTER VIII - - _THE FAMINE AND THE SIEGE_ - - 2 KINGS vi. 24-vii. 20 - - "'Tis truly no good plan when princes play - The vulture among carrion; but when - They play the carrion among vultures--that - Is ten times worse." - LESSING, _Nathan the Wise_, Act I., Sc. 3. - - -If the Benhadad, King of Syria, who reduced Samaria to the horrible -straits recorded in this chapter, (2 Kings vi.) was the same Benhadad -whom Ahab had treated with such impolitic confidence, his hatred -against Israel must indeed have burned hotly. Besides the affair at -Dothan, he had already been twice routed with enormous slaughter, and -against those disasters he could only set the death of Ahab at -Ramoth-Gilead. It is obvious from the preceding narrative that he -could advance at any time at his will and pleasure into the heart of -his enemy's country, and shut him up in his capital almost without -resistance. The siege-trains of ancient days were very inefficient, -and any strong fortress could hold out for years, if only it was well -provisioned. Such was not the case with Samaria, and it was reduced to -a condition of sore famine. Food so loathsome as an ass's head, which -at other times the poorest would have spurned, was now sold for eighty -shekels' weight of silver (about 8); and the fourth part of a -_xestes_ or _kab_--which was itself the smallest dry-measure, the -sixth part of a _seah_--of the coarse, common pulse, or roasted -chick-peas, vulgarly known as "dove's dung," fetched five shekels -(about 12_s._ 6_d._).[117] - -While things were at this awful pass, "the King of Israel," as he is -vaguely called throughout this story, went his rounds upon the wall to -visit the sentries and encourage the soldiers in their defence. As he -passed, a woman cried, "Help, my lord, O king!" In Eastern monarchies -the king is a judge of the humblest; a suppliant, however mean, may -cry to him. Jehoram thought that this was but one of the appeals which -sprang from the clamorous mendicity of famine with which he had grown -so painfully familiar. "The Lord curse you!" he exclaimed -impatiently.[118] "How can I help you? Every barn-floor is bare, every -wine-press drained." And he passed on. - -But the woman continued her wild clamour, and turning round at her -importunity, he asked, "What aileth thee?" - -He heard in reply a narrative as appalling as ever smote the ear of a -king in a besieged city. Among the curses denounced upon apostate Israel -in the Pentateuch, we read, "Ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and -the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat";[119] or, as it is expressed -more fully in the Book of Deuteronomy, "He shall besiege thee in all -thy gates throughout all thy land.... And thou shalt eat the fruit of -thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and thy daughters, which the Lord -thy God hath given thee, in the siege, and in the straitness wherewith -thine enemies shall distress thee: so that the man that is tender among -you, and very delicate, his eye shall be evil towards his brother, and -towards the wife of his bosom, and towards the remnant of his children -which he shall leave; so that he shall not give to any of them of the -flesh of his children whom he shall eat, because he hath nothing left -him in the siege.... The tender and delicate woman, which would not -adventure to set the sole of her foot upon the ground for delicateness -and tenderness, her eye shall be evil towards the husband of her bosom, -and towards her son, and towards her daughter, and towards her children: -for she shall eat them for want of all things secretly in the siege and -the straitness, if thou wilt not observe to do all the words of the law, -... that thou mayest fear the glorious and fearful name, _The Lord thy -God_."[120] We find almost the same words in the prophet Jeremiah;[121] -and in Lamentations we read: "The hands of the pitiful women have sodden -their own children: they were their meat in the destruction of the -daughter of My people."[122] - -Isaiah asks, "Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not -have compassion on the son of her womb?" Alas! it has always been so in -those awful scenes of famine, whether after shipwreck or in beleaguered -cities, when man becomes degraded to an animal, with all an animal's -primitive instincts, and when the wild beast appears under the thin -veneer of civilisation. So it was at the siege of Jerusalem, and at the -siege of Magdeburg, and at the wreck of the _Medusa_, and on many -another occasion when the pangs of hunger have corroded away every -vestige of the tender affections and of the moral sense. - -And this had occurred at Samaria: her women had become cannibals and -devoured their own little ones. - -"This woman," screamed the suppliant, pointing her lean finger at a -wretch like herself--"this woman said unto me, 'Give thy son, that we -may eat him to-day, and we will afterwards eat my son.' I yielded to -her suggestion. We killed my little son, and ate his flesh when we had -sodden it. Next day I said to her, 'Now give thy son, that we may eat -him'; and she hath hid her son!" - -How could the king answer such a horrible appeal? Injustice had been -done; but was he to order and to sanction by way of redress fresh -cannibalism, and the murder by its mother of another babe? In that -foul obliteration of every natural instinct, what could he do, what -could any man do? Can there be equity among raging wild beasts, when -they roar for their prey and are unfed? - -All that the miserable king could do was to rend his clothes in horror -and to pass on, and as his starving subjects passed by him on the wall -they saw that he wore sackcloth beneath his purple, in sign, if not of -repentance, yet of anguish, if not of prayer, yet of uttermost -humiliation.[123] - -But if indeed he had, in his misery, donned that sackcloth in order -that at least the semblance of self-mortification might move Jehovah -to pity, as it had done in the case of his father Ahab, the external -sign of his humility had done nothing to change his heart. The -gruesome appeal to which he had just been forced to listen only -kindled him to a burst of fury[124].The man who had warned, who had -prophesied, who so far during this siege had not raised his finger to -help--the man who was believed to be able to wield the powers of -heaven, and had wrought no deliverance for his people, but suffered -them to sink unaided into these depths of abjectness--should he be -permitted to live? If Jehovah would not help, of what use was Elisha? -"God do so to me, and more also," exclaimed Jehoram--using his -mother's oath to Elijah[125]--"if the head of Elisha, the son of -Shaphat, shall stand on him this day." - -Was this the king who had come to Elisha with such humble entreaty, -when three armies were perishing of thirst before the eyes of Moab? -Was this the king who had called Elisha "my father," when the prophet -had led the deluded host of Syrians into Samaria, and bidden Jehoram -to set large provision before them? It was the same king, but now -transported with fury and reduced to despair. His threat against God's -prophet was in reality a defiance of God, as when our unhappy -Plantagenet, Henry II., maddened by the loss of Le Mans, exclaimed -that, since God had robbed him of the town he loved, he would pay God -out by robbing Him of that which He most loved in him--his soul. - -Jehoram's threat was meant in grim earnest, and he sent an executioner -to carry it out. Elisha was sitting in his house with the elders of -the city, who had come to him for counsel at this hour of supreme -need. He knew what was intended for him, and it had also been revealed -to him that the king would follow his messenger to cancel his -sanguinary threat. "See ye," he said to the elders, "how this son of a -murderer"--for again he indicates his contempt and indignation for the -son of Ahab and Jezebel--"hath sent to behead me! When he comes, shut -the door, and hold it fast against him. His master is following hard -at his heels." - -The messenger came, and was refused admittance. The king followed -him,[126] and entering the room where the prophet and elders sat, he -gave up his wicked design of slaying Elisha with the sword, but he -overwhelmed him with reproaches, and in despair renounced all further -trust in Jehovah. Elisha, as the king's words imply, must have refused -all permission to capitulate: he must have held out from the first a -promise that God would send deliverance. But no deliverance had come. -The people were starving. Women were devouring their babes. Nothing -worse could happen if they flung open their gates to the Syrian host. -"Behold," the king said, "this evil is Jehovah's doing. You have -deceived us. Jehovah does not intend to deliver us. Why should I wait -for Him any longer?" Perhaps the king meant to imply that his mother's -Baal was better worth serving, and would never have left his votaries -to sink into these straits. - -And now man's extremity had come, and it was God's opportunity. Elisha -at last was permitted to announce that the worst was over, that the -next day plenty should smile on the besieged city. "Thus saith the -Lord," he exclaimed to the exhausted and despondent king, "To-morrow -about this time, instead of an ass's head being sold for eighty -shekels, and a thimbleful of pulse for five shekels, a peck of fine -flour shall be sold for a shekel, and two pecks of barley for a -shekel, in the gate of Samaria." - -The king was leaning on the hand of his chief officer, and to this -soldier the promise seemed not only incredible, but silly: for at the -best he could only suppose that the Syrian host would raise the siege; -and though to hope for that looked an absurdity, yet even that would -not in the least fulfil the immense prediction. He answered, -therefore, in utter scorn: "Yes! Jehovah is making windows in heaven! -But even thus could this be?" It is much as if he should have answered -some solemn pledge with a derisive proverb such as, "Yes! if the sky -should fall, we should catch larks!" - -Such contemptuous repudiation of a Divine promise was a blasphemy; and -answering scorn with scorn, and riddle with riddling, Elisha answers -the mocker, "Yes! and _you_ shall see this, but shall not enjoy it." - -The word of the Lord was the word of a true prophet, and the miracle -was wrought. Not only was the siege raised, but the wholly unforeseen -spoil of the entire Syrian camp, with all its accumulated rapine, -brought about the predicted plenty. - -There were four lepers[127] outside the gate of Samaria, like the -leprous mendicants who gather there to this day. They were cut off -from all human society, except their own. Leprosy was treated as -contagious, and if "houses of the unfortunate" (_Biut-el-Maskin_) -were provided for them, as seems to have been the case at Jerusalem, -they were built outside the city walls.[128] They could only live by -beggary, and this was an aggravation of their miserable condition. And -how could any one fling food to these beggars over the walls, when -food of any kind was barely to be had within them? - -So taking counsel of their despair, they decided that they would -desert to the Syrians: among them they would at least find food, if -their lives were spared; and if not, death would be a happy release -from their present misery. - -So in the evening twilight, when they could not be seen or shot at -from the city wall as deserters, they stole down to the Syrian camp. - -When they reached its outermost circle, to their amazement all was -silence. They crept into one of the tents in fear and astonishment. -There was food and drink there, and they satisfied the cravings of -their hunger. It was also stored with booty from the plundered cities -and villages of Israel. To this they helped themselves, and took it -away and hid it. Having spoiled this tent, they entered a second. It -was likewise deserted, and they carried a fresh store of treasures to -their hiding-place. And then they began to feel uneasy at not -divulging to their starving fellow-citizens the strange and golden -tidings of a deserted camp. The night was wearing on; day would reveal -the secret. If they carried the good news, they would doubtless earn a -rich guerdon. If they waited till morning, they might be put to death -for their selfish reticence and theft. It was safest to return to the -city, and rouse the warder, and send a message to the palace. So the -lepers hurried back through the night, and shouted to the sentinel at -the gate, "We went to the Syrian camp, and it was deserted! Not a man -was there, not a sound was to be heard. The horses were tethered -there, and the asses, and the tents were left just as they were." - -The sentinel called the other watchmen to hear the wonderful news, and -instantly ran with it to the palace. The slumbering house was roused; -and though it was still night, the king himself arose. But he could not -shake off his despondency, and made no reference to Elisha's prediction. -News sometimes sounds too good to be true. "It is only a decoy," he -said. "They can only have left their camp to lure us into an ambuscade, -that they may return, and slaughter us, and capture our city." - -"Send to see," answered one of his courtiers. "Send five horsemen to -test the truth, and to look out. If they perish, their fate is but the -fate of us all." - -So two chariots with horses were despatched, with instructions not -only to visit the camp, but track the movements of the host. - -They went, and found that it was as the lepers had said. The camp was -deserted, and lay there as an immense booty; and for some reason the -Syrians had fled towards the Jordan to make good their escape to -Damascus by the eastern bank. The whole road was strewn with the traces -of their headlong flight; it was full of scattered garments and vessels. - -Probably, too, the messengers came across some disabled fugitive, and -learnt the secret of this amazing stampede. It was the result of one of -those sudden unaccountable panics to which the huge, unwieldy, -heterogeneous Eastern armies, which have no organised system of -sentries, and no trained discipline, are constantly liable. We have -already met with several instances in the history of Israel. Such was -the panic which seized the Midianites when Gideon's three hundred blew -their trumpets; and the panic of the Syrians before Ahab's pages of the -provinces; and of the combined armies in the Valley of Salt; and of the -Moabites at Wady-el-Ahsy; and afterwards of the Assyrians before the -walls of Jerusalem. Fear is physically contagious, and, when once it has -set in, it swells with such unaccountable violence, that the Greeks -called these terrors "panic," because they believed them to be directly -inspired by the god Pan. Well-disciplined as was the army of the Ten -Thousand Greeks in their famous retreat, they nearly fell victims to a -sudden panic, had not Clearchus, with prompt resource, published by the -herald the proclamation of a reward for the arrest of the man who had -let the ass loose. Such an unaccountable terror--caused by a noise as of -chariots and of horses which reverberated among the hills--had seized -the Syrian host. They thought that Jehoram had secretly hired an army of -the princes of the Khetas[129] and of the Egyptians to march suddenly -upon them. In wild confusion, not stopping to reason or to inquire, they -took to flight, increasing their panic by the noise and rush of their -own precipitance. - -No sooner had the messengers delivered their glad tidings, than the -people of Samaria began to pour tumultuously out of the gates, to -fling themselves on the food and on the spoil. It was like the rush of -the dirty, starving, emaciated wretches which horrified the keepers -of the reserved stores at Smolensk in Napoleon's retreat from Moscow, -and forced them to shut the gates, and fling food and grain to the -struggling soldiers out of the windows of the granaries. To secure -order and prevent disaster, the king appointed his attendant lord to -keep the gate. But the torrent of people flung him down, and they -trampled on his body in their eagerness for relief. He died after -having seen that the promise of Elisha was fulfilled, and that the -cheapness and abundance had been granted, the prophecy of which he -thought only fit for his sceptical derision. - -"The sudden panic which delivered the city," says Dean Stanley, "is -the one marked intervention on behalf of the northern capital. No -other incident could be found in the sacred annals so appropriately to -express, in the Church of Gouda, the pious gratitude of the citizens -of Leyden, for their deliverance from the Spanish army, as the -miraculous raising of the siege of Samaria."[130] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[117] So _asafoetida_ is called "devil's dung" in Germany; and the -_Herba alcali_, "sparrow's dung" by Arabs. The _Q'ri_, however, supports -the _literal_ meaning; and compare 2 Kings xviii. 27; Jos., _B. J._, V. -xiii. 7. Analogies for these prices are quoted from classic authors. -Plutarch (_Artax._, xxiv.) mentions a siege in which an ass's head could -hardly be got for sixty drachmas (2 10_s._), though usually the whole -animal only cost 1. Pliny (_H. N._, viii. 57) says that during -Hannibal's siege of Casilinum a mouse sold for 6 5_s._ - -[118] So Clericus. Comp. Jos. [Greek: eprasato aut]. - -[119] Lev. xxvi. 29. - -[120] Deut. xxviii. 52-58. - -[121] Jer. xix. 9. - -[122] Lam. iv. 10: comp. ii. 20; Ezek. v. 10; Jos., _B. J._, VI. iii. 4. - -[123] 1 Kings xxi. 27; Isa. xx. 2, 3. - -[124] Compare the wrath of Pashur the priest in consequence of the -denunciation of Jeremiah (Jer. xx. 2). - -[125] 1 Kings xix. 2. - -[126] In 2 Kings vi. 33 we should read _melek_ (king) for _maleak_ -(messenger). Jehoram repented of his hasty order. - -[127] The Jews say Gehazi, and his three sons (Jarchi). - -[128] Lev. xiii. 46; Num. v. 2, 3. - -[129] The capitals of the ancient Hittites--a nation whose fame had -been almost entirely obliterated till a few years ago--were -Karchemish, Kadesh, Hamath, and Helbon (Aleppo). - -[130] _Lectures_, ii. 345. - - - - - CHAPTER IX - - _THE SHUNAMMITE AND HAZAEL_ - - 2 KINGS viii. 1-6, 7-15. (Circ. B.C. 886.) - - "Our acts still follow with us from afar, - And what we have been makes us what we are." - GEORGE ELIOT. - - -The next anecdote of Elisha brings us once more into contact with the -Lady of Shunem. Famines, or dearths, were unhappily of very frequent -occurrence in a country which is so wholly dependent, as Palestine is, -upon the early and latter rain. On some former occasion Elisha had -foreseen that "Jehovah had called for a famine"; for the sword, the -famine, and the pestilence are represented as ministers who wait His -bidding.[131] He had also foreseen that it would be of long duration, -and in kindness to the Shunammite had warned her that she had better -remove for a time into a land in which there was greater plenty. It -was under similar circumstances that Elimelech and Naomi, ancestors of -David's line, had taken their sons Mahlon and Chilion, and gone to -live in the land of Moab; and, indeed, the famine which decided the -migration of Jacob and his children into Egypt had been a -turning-point in the history of the Chosen People. - -The Lady of Shunem had learnt by experience the weight of Elisha's -words. Her husband is not mentioned, and was probably dead; so she -arose with her household, and went for seven years to live in the -plain of Philistia. At the end of that time the dearth had ceased, and -she returned to Shunem, but only to find that during her absence her -house and land were in possession of other owners, and had probably -escheated to the Crown. The king was the ultimate, and to a great -extent the only, source of justice in his little kingdom, and she went -to lay her claim before him and demand the restitution of her -property. By a providential circumstance she came exactly at the most -favourable moment. The king--it must have been Jehoram--was at the -very time talking to Gehazi about the great works of Elisha. As it is -unlikely that he would converse long with a leper, and as Gehazi is -still called "the servant of the man of God," the incident may here be -narrated out of order. It is pleasant to find Jehoram taking so deep -an interest in the prophet's story. Already on many occasions during -his wars with Moab and Syria, as well as on the occasion of Naaman's -visit, if that had already occurred, he had received the completest -proof of the reality of Elisha's mission, but he might be naturally -unaware of the many private incidents in which he had exhibited a -supernatural power. Among other stories Gehazi was telling him that of -the Shunammite, and how Elisha had given life to her dead son. At that -juncture she came before the king, and Gehazi said, "My lord, O king, -this is the very woman, and this is her son whom Elisha recalled to -life." In answer to Jehoram's questions she confirmed the story, and -he was so much impressed by the narrative that he not only ordered -the immediate restitution of her land, but also of the value of its -products during the seven years of her exile. - -We now come to the fulfilment of the second of the commands which -Elijah had received so long before at Horeb. To complete the -retribution which was yet to fall on Israel, he had been bidden to -anoint Hazael to be king of Syria in the room of Benhadad. Hitherto -the mandate had remained unfulfilled, because no opportunity had -occurred; but the appointed time had now arrived. Elisha, for some -purpose, and during an interval of peace, visited Damascus, where the -visit of Naaman and the events of the Syrian wars had made his name -very famous. Benhadad II., grandson or great-grandson of Rezin, after -a stormy reign of some thirty years, marked by some successes, but -also by the terrible reverses already recorded, lay dangerously ill. -Hearing the news that the wonder-working prophet of Israel was in his -capital, he sent to ask of him the question, "Shall I recover?" It had -been the custom from the earliest days to propitiate the favour of -prophets by presents, without which even the humblest suppliant hardly -ventured to approach them.[132] The gift sent by Benhadad was truly -royal, for he thought perhaps that he could purchase the intercession -or the miraculous intervention of this mighty thaumaturge. He sent -Hazael with a selection "of every good thing of Damascus," and, like -an Eastern, he endeavoured to make his offering seem more -magnificent[133] by distributing it on the backs of forty camels. - -At the head of this imposing procession of camels walked Hazael, the -commander of the forces, and stood in Elisha's presence with the -humble appeal, "Thy son Benhadad, King of Syria, hath sent me to thee, -saying, Shall I recover of this disease?" - -About the king's munificence we are told no more, but we cannot doubt -that it was refused. If Naaman's still costlier blessing had been -rejected, though he was about to receive through Elisha's ministration -an inestimable boon, it is unlikely that Elisha would accept a gift -for which he could offer no return, and which, in fact, directly or -indirectly, involved the death of the sender. But the historian does -not think it necessary to pause and tell us that Elisha sent back the -forty camels unladen of their treasures. It was not worth while to -narrate what was a matter of course. If it had been no time, a few -years earlier, to receive money and garments, and olive-yards and -vineyards, and men-servants and maid-servants, still less was it a -time to do so now. The days were darker now than they had been, and -Elisha himself stood near the Great White Throne. The protection of -these fearless prophets lay in their utter simplicity of soul. They -rose above human fears because they stood above human desires. What -Elisha possessed was more than sufficient for the needs of the plain -and humble life of one whose communing was with God. It was not -wonderful that prophets should rise to an elevation whence they could -look down with indifference upon the superfluities of the lust of the -eyes and the pride of life, when even sages of the heathen have -attained to a similar independence of earthly luxuries. One who can -climb such mountain-heights can look with silent contempt on gold. - -But there is a serious difficulty about Elisha's answer to the -embassage. "Go, say unto him"--so it is rendered in our Authorised -Version--"Thou mayest certainly recover: howbeit the Lord hath showed -me that he shall surely die." - -It is evident that the translators of 1611 meant the emphasis to be -laid on the "_mayest_," and understood the answer of Elisha to mean, -"Thy recovery is quite possible; and yet"--he adds to Hazael, and not -as part of his answer to the king--"Jehovah has shown me that dying he -shall die,"--not indeed of this disease, but by other means before he -has recovered from it. - -Unfortunately, however, the Hebrew will not bear this meaning. Elisha -bids Hazael to go back with the distinct message, "Thou shalt surely -recover," as it is rightly rendered in the Revised Version. - -This, however, is the rendering, not of the _written_ text as it stands, -but of the margin. Every one knows that in the Masoretic original the -text itself is called the K'thb, or "what is written," whereas the -margin is called _Q'r_, "read." Now, our translators, both those of -1611 and those of the Revision Committee, all but invariably follow the -Kethb as the most authentic reading. In this instance, however, they -abandon the rule and translate the marginal reading. - -What, then, is the written text? - -It is the reverse of the marginal reading, for it has: "Go, say, Thou -shalt _not_ recover." - -The reader may naturally ask the cause of this startling discrepancy. - -It seems to be twofold. - -(I.) Both the Hebrew word _lo_, "not" ([Hebrew: lo]), and the word -_lo_, "to him" ([Hebrew: lo]), have precisely the same pronunciation. -Hence this text might mean either "Go, say _to him_, Thou shalt -certainly recover," or "Go, say, Thou shalt _not_ recover." The same -identity of the negative and the dative of the preposition has made -nonsense of another passage of the Authorised Version, where "Thou -hast multiplied the nation, and _not_ increased the joy: they joy -before Thee according to the joy of harvest," should be "Thou hast -multiplied the nation, and increased _its_ joy." So, too, the verse -"It is He that hath made us, and _not_ we ourselves," may mean "It is -He that hath made us, and _to Him_ we belong." In the present case the -adoption of the negative (which would have conveyed to Benhadad the -exact truth) is not possible; for it makes the next clause and its -introduction by the word "Howbeit" entirely meaningless. - -But (II.) this confusion in the text might not have arisen in the -present instance but for the difficulty of Elisha's appearing to send -a deliberately false message to Benhadad, and a message which he tells -Hazael at the time is false. - -Can this be deemed impossible? - -With the views prevalent in "those times of ignorance," I think not. -Abraham and Isaac, saints and patriarchs as they were, both told -practical falsehoods about their wives. They, indeed, were reproved -for this, though not severely; but, on the other hand, Jael is not -reproved for her treachery to Sisera; and Samuel, under the semblance -of a Divine permission, used a diplomatic ruse when he visited the -household of Jesse; and in the apologue of Micaiah a lying spirit is -represented as sent forth to do service to Jehovah; and Elisha himself -tells a deliberate falsehood to the Syrians at Dothan. The -sensitiveness to the duty of always speaking the exact truth is not -felt in the East with anything like the intensity that it is in -Christian lands; and reluctant as we should be to find in the message -of Elisha another instance of that _falsitas dispensativa_ which has -been so fatally patronised by some of the Fathers and by many Romish -theologians, the love of truth itself would compel us to accept this -view of the case, if there were no other possible interpretation. - -I think, however, that another view is possible. I think that Elisha -may have said to Hazael, "Go, say unto him, Thou shalt surely -recover," with the same accent of irony in which Micaiah said at first -to the two kings, "Go up to Ramoth-Gilead, and prosper; for the Lord -shall deliver it into the hand of the king." I think that his whole -manner and the tone of his voice may have shown to Hazael, and may -have been meant to show him, that this was not Elisha's real message -to Benhadad. Or, to adopt the same line of explanation with an -unimportant difference, Elisha may have meant to imply, "Go, follow -the bent which I know you _will_ follow; go, carry back to your master -the lying message that I said he would recover. But that is not _my_ -message. My message, whether it suits your courtier instincts or not, -is that Jehovah has warned me that he shall surely die." - -That some such meaning as this attaches to the verse seems to be shown -by the context. For not only was some reproof involved in Elisha's -words, but he showed his grief still more by his manner. It was as -though he had said, "Take back what message you choose, but Benhadad -will certainly die"; and then he fastened his steady gaze on the -soldier's countenance, till Hazael blushed and became uneasy. Only -when he noted that Hazael's conscience was troubled by the glittering -eyes which seemed to read the inmost secrets of his heart did Elisha -drop his glance, and burst into tears. "Why weepeth, my lord?" asked -Hazael, in still deeper uneasiness. Whereupon Elisha revealed to him -the future. "I weep," he said, "because I see in thee the curse and -the avenger of the sins of my native land. Thou wilt become to them a -sword of God; thou wilt set their fortresses on fire; thou wilt -slaughter their youths; thou wilt dash their little ones to pieces -against the stones; thou wilt rip up their women with child." That he -actually inflicted these savageries of warfare on the miserable -Israelites we are not told, but we are told that he smote them in all -their coasts; that Jehovah delivered them into his hands; that he -oppressed Israel all the days of Jehoahaz.[134] That being so, there -can be no question that he carried out the same laws of atrocious -warfare which belonged to those times and continued long afterwards. -Such atrocities were not only inflicted on the Israelites again and -again by the Assyrians and others,[135] but they themselves had often -inflicted them, and inflicted them with what they believed to be -Divine approval, on their own enemies.[136] Centuries after, one of -their own poets accounted it a beatitude to him who should dash the -children of the Babylonians against the stones.[137] - -As the answer of Hazael is usually read and interpreted, we are taught -to regard it as an indignant declaration that he could never be guilty -of such vile deeds. It is regarded as though it were "an abhorrent -repudiation of his future self." The lesson often drawn from it in -sermons is that a man may live to do, and to delight in, crimes which -he once hated and deemed it impossible that he should ever commit. - -The lesson is a most true one, and is capable of a thousand -illustrations. It conveys the deeply needed warning that those who, -even in thought, dabble with wrong courses, which they only regard as -venial peccadilloes, may live to commit, without any sense of horror, -the most enormous offences. It is the explanation of the terrible fact -that youths who once seemed innocent and holy-minded may grow up, step -by step, into colossal criminals. "Men," says Scherer, "advance -unconsciously from errors to faults, and from faults to crimes, till -sensibility is destroyed by the habitual spectacle of guilt, and the -most savage atrocities come to be dignified by the name of State -policy." - - "Lui-mme son portrait forc de rendre hommage, - Il frmira d'horreur devant sa propre image." - -But true and needful as these lessons are, they are entirely beside the -mark as deduced from the story of Hazael. What he said was not, as in -our Authorised Version, "But what, is thy servant a dog, that he should -do this great thing?" nor by "great thing" does he mean "so deadly a -crime." His words, more accurately rendered in our Revision, are, "But -what is thy servant, which is but a dog, that he should do this great -thing?" or, "But what is the dog, thy servant?" It was a hypocritic -deprecation of the future importance and eminence which Elisha had -prophesied for him. There is not the least sense of horror either in his -words or in his thoughts. He merely means "A mere dog, such as I am, can -never accomplish such great designs." A dog in the East is utterly -despised;[138] and Hazael, with Oriental irony, calls himself a dog, -though he was the Syrian Commander-in-chief--just as a Chinaman, in -speaking of himself, adopts the periphrasis "this little thief." - -Elisha did not notice his sham humility, but told him, "The Lord hath -showed me that thou shalt be King over Syria." The date of the event -was B.C. 886. - -The scene has sometimes been misrepresented to Elisha's discredit, as -though he suggested to the general the crimes of murder and rebellion. -The accusation is entirely untenable. Elisha was, indeed, in one -sense, commissioned to anoint Hazael King of Syria, because the cruel -soldier had been predestined by God to that position; but, in another -sense, he had no power whatever to give to Hazael the mighty kingdom -of Aram, nor to wrest it from the dynasty which had now held it for -many generations. All this was brought about by the Divine purpose, in -a course of events entirely out of the sphere of the humble man of -God. In the transferring of this crown he was in no sense the agent or -the suggester. The thought of usurpation must, without doubt, have -been already in Hazael's mind. Benhadad, as far as we know, was -childless. At any rate he had no natural heirs, and seems to have been -a drunken king, whose reckless undertakings and immense failures had -so completely alienated the affections of his subjects from himself -and his dynasty, that he died undesired and unlamented, and no hand -was uplifted to strike a blow in his defence. It hardly needed a -prophet to foresee that the sceptre would be snatched by so strong a -hand as that of Hazael from a grasp so feeble as that of Benhadad II. -The utmost that Elisha had done was, under Divine guidance, to read -his character and his designs, and to tell him that the accomplishment -of these designs was near at hand. - -So Hazael went back to Benhadad, and in answer to the eager inquiry, -"What said Elisha to thee?" he gave the answer which Elisha had -foreseen that he meant to give, and which was in any case a falsehood, -for it suppressed half of what Elisha had really said. "He told me," -said Hazael, "that thou shouldest surely recover." - -Was the sequel of the interview the murder of Benhadad by Hazael? - -The story has usually been so read, but Elisha had neither prophesied -this nor suggested it. The sequel is thus described. "And it came to -pass on the morrow, that _he_ took the coverlet,[139] and dipped it in -water, and spread it on his face, so that he died: and Hazael reigned -in his stead." The repetition of the name Hazael in the last clause is -superfluous if he was the subject of the previous clause, and it has -been consequently conjectured that "he took" is merely the impersonal -idiom "one took." Some suppose that, as Benhadad was in the bath, his -servant took the bath-cloth, wetted it, and laid its thick folds over -the mouth of the helpless king; others, that he soaked the thick -quilt, which the king was too weak to lift away.[140] In either case -it is hardly likely that a great officer like Hazael would have been -in the bath-room or the bed-room of the dying king. Yet we must -remember that the Prtorian Prfect Macro is said to have suffocated -Tiberius with his bed-clothes. Josephus says that Hazael strangled his -master with a net; and, indeed, he has generally been held guilty of -the perpetration of the murder. But it is fair to give him the benefit -of the doubt. Be that as it may, he seems to have reigned for some -forty-six years (B.C. 886-840), and to have bequeathed the sceptre to -a son on whom he had bestowed the old dynastic name of Benhadad. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[131] Jer. xxv. 29; Ezek. xxxviii. 21. - -[132] See the cases of Samuel (1 Sam. ix. 7), of Ahijah (1 Kings xiv. -3), and of Elisha himself (2 Kings iv. 42). - -[133] As Jacob did in sending forward his present to Esau. Comp. -Chardin, _Voyages_, iii. 217. - -[134] 2 Kings x. 32, xiii. 3, 22. - -[135] Isa. xiii. 15, 16; Hos. x. 14, xiii. 16; Nah. iii. 10. - -[136] See Josh. vi. 17, 21; 1 Sam. xv. 3; Lev. xxvii. 28, 29. - -[137] Psalm cxxxvii. 9. - -[138] 1 Sam. xxiv. 14; 2 Sam. ix. 8. - -[139] [Hebrew: machber] Jos., _Antt._, IX. iv. 6, [Greek: diktuon -diabrochon]. Aquila, Symmachus, [Greek: to strma]. Michaelis supposed -it to be the mosquito-net ([Greek: knpeion]). Comp. 1 Sam. xix. 13. -Ewald suggested "bath-mattress" (iii. 523). Sir G. Grove (_s.v._ -"Elisha," _Bibl. Dict._, ii. 923) mentions that Abbas Pasha is said to -have been murdered in the same manner. Some, however, think that the -measure was taken by way of cure (Bruce, _Travels_, iii. 33. -Klostermann, _ad loc._, alters the text at his pleasure). - -[140] 2 Kings viii. 15; LXX., [Greek: to machbar]; Vulg., _stragulum_; -lit., "woven cloth." - - - - - CHAPTER X - - (1) _JEHORAM BEN-JEHOSHAPHAT OF JUDAH_ - - B.C. 851-843 - - (2) _AHAZIAH BEN-JEHORAM OF JUDAH_ - - B.C. 843-842 - - 2 KINGS viii. 16-24, 25-29 - - "Bear like the Turk, no brother near the throne."--POPE. - - -The narrative now reverts to the kingdom of Judah, of which the -historian, mainly occupied with the great deeds of the prophet in -Israel, takes at this period but little notice. - -He tells us that in the fifth year of Jehoram of Israel, son of Ahab, -his namesake and brother-in-law, Jehoram of Judah, began to reign in -Judah, though his father, Jehoshaphat, was then king.[141] - -The statement is full of difficulties, especially as we have been -already told (i. 17) that Jehoram ben-Ahab of Israel began to reign in -the _second_ year of Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat of Judah, and (iii. 1) -in the eighteenth year of Jehoshaphat. It is hardly worth while to -pause here to disentangle these complexities in a writer who, like -most Eastern historians, is content with loose chronological -references. By the current mode of reckoning, the twenty-five years of -Jehoshaphat's reign may merely mean twenty-three and a month or two of -two other years; and some suppose that, when Jehoram of Judah was -about sixteen, his father went on the expedition against Moab, and -associated his son with him in the throne. This is only conjecture. -Jehoshaphat, of all kings, least needed a coadjutor, particularly so -weak and worthless a one as his son; and though the association of -colleagues with themselves has been common in some realms, there is -not a single instance of it in the history of Israel and Judah--the -case of Uzziah, who was a leper, not being to the point.[142] - -The kings both of Israel and of Judah at this period, with the single -exception of the brave and good Jehoshaphat, were unworthy and -miserable. The blight of the Jezebel-marriage and the curse of -Baal-worship lay upon both kingdoms. It is scarcely possible to find -such wretched monarchs as the two sons of Jezebel--Ahaziah and Jehoram -in Israel, and the son-in-law and grandson of Jezebel, Jehoram and -Ahaziah, in Judah. Their respective reigns are annals of shameful -apostasy, and almost unbroken disaster. - -Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat of Judah was thirty-two years old when he -began his independent reign, and reigned for eight deplorable years. -The fact that his mother's name is (exceptionally) omitted seems to -imply that his father Jehoshaphat set the good example of -monogamy.[143] Jehoram was wholly under the influence of Athaliah, his -wife, and of Jezebel, his mother-in-law, and he introduced into Judah -their alien abominations. He "walked in their way, and did evil in the -sight of the Lord." The Chronicler fills up the general remark by -saying that he did his utmost to foster idolatry by erecting _bamoth_ -in the mountains of Judah, and compelled his people to worship there, -in order to decentralise the religious services of the kingdom, and so -to diminish the glory of the Temple. He introduced Baal-worship into -Judah, and either he or his son was the guilty builder of a temple to -Baalim, not only on the "opprobrious mount" on which stood the -idolatrous chapels of Solomon, but on the Hill of the House itself. -This temple had its own high priest, and was actually adorned with -treasures torn from the Temple of Jehovah.[144] So bad was Jehoram's -conduct that the historian can only attribute his non-destruction to -the "covenant of salt" which God had made with David, "to give him a -lamp for his children always." - -But if actual destruction did not come upon him and his race, he came -very near such a fate, and he certainly experienced that "the path of -transgressors is hard." There is nothing to record about him but crime -and catastrophe. First Edom revolted. Jehoshaphat had subdued the -Edomites, and only allowed them to be governed by a vassal; now they -threw off the yoke. The Jewish King advanced against them to "Zair"--by -which must be meant apparently either Zoar (through which the road to -Edom lay), or their capital, Mount Seir.[145] There he was surrounded by -the Edomite hosts; and though by a desperate act of valour he cut his -way through them at night in spite of their reserve of chariots, yet his -army left him in the lurch.[146] Edom succeeded in establishing its -final independence, to which we see an allusion in the one hope held out -to Esau by Isaac in that "blessing" which was practically a curse. - -The loss of so powerful a subject-territory, which now constituted a -source of danger on the eastern frontier of Judah, was succeeded by -another disaster on the south-west, in the Shephelah or lowland plain. -Here Libnah revolted,[147] and by gaining its autonomy contracted yet -farther the narrow limits of the southern kingdom. - -The Book of Kings tells us no more about the Jewish Jehoram, only -adding that he died and was buried with his fathers, and was succeeded -by his son Ahaziah. But the Book of Chronicles, which adds far darker -touches to his character, also heightens to an extraordinary degree -the intensity of his punishment. It tells us that he began his reign -by the atrocious murder of his six younger brothers, for whom, -following the old precedent of Rehoboam, Jehoshaphat had provided by -establishing them as governors of various cities. As his throne was -secure, we cannot imagine any motive for this brutal massacre except -the greed of gain, and we can only suppose that, as Jehoram -ben-Jehoshaphat became little more than a friendly vassal of his -kinsmen in Israel, so he fell under the deadly influence of his wife -Athaliah, as completely as his father-in-law had done under the spell -of her mother Jezebel. With his brothers he also swept away a number -of the chief nobles, who perhaps embraced the cause of his murdered -kinsmen. Such conduct breathes the known spirit of Jezebel and of -Athaliah. To rebuke him for this wickedness, he received the menace of -a tremendous judgment upon his home and people in a writing from -_Elijah_, whom we should certainly have assumed to be dead long before -that time. The judgment itself followed. The Philistines and Arabians -invaded Judah, captured Jerusalem, and murdered all Jehoram's own -children, except Ahaziah, who was the youngest. Then Jehoram, at the -age of thirty-eight, was smitten with an incurable disease of the -bowels, of which he died two years later, and not only died -unlamented, but was refused burial in the sepulchres of the kings. In -any case his reign and that of his son and successor were the most -miserable in the annals of Judah, as the reigns of their namesakes and -kinsmen, Ahaziah ben-Ahab and Jehoram ben-Ahab, were also the most -miserable in the annals of Israel. - -Jehoram was succeeded on the throne of Judah by his son Ahaziah. If -the chronology and the facts be correct, Ahaziah ben-Jehoram of Judah -must have been born when his father was only eighteen, though he was -the youngest of the king's sons, and so escaped from being massacred -in the Philistine invasion. He succeeded at the age of twenty-two, -and only reigned a single year. During this year his mother, the -Gebrah Athaliah, the daughter of Ahab and Jezebel, and granddaughter -of the Tyrian Ethbaal, was all-supreme. She bent the weak nature of -her son to still further apostasies. She was "his counsellor to do -wickedly," and her Baal-priest Mattan was more important than the -Aaronic high priest of the despised and desecrated Temple. Never did -Judah sink to so low a level, and it was well that the days of Ahaziah -of Judah were cut short. - -The only event in his reign was the share he took with his uncle -Jehoram of Israel in his campaign to protect Ramoth-Gilead from -Hazael. The expedition seems to have been successful in its main -purpose. Ramoth-Gilead, the key to the districts of Argob and Bashan, -was of immense importance for commanding the country beyond Jordan. It -seems to be the same as Ramath-Mizpeh (Josh. xiii. 26); and if so, it -was the spot where Jacob made his covenant with Laban. Ahab, or his -successors, in spite of the disastrous end of the expedition to Ahab -personally, had evidently recovered the frontier fortress from the -Syrian king.[148] Its position upon a hill made its possession vital -to the interests of Gilead; for the master of Ramah was the master of -that Trans-Jordanic district. But Hazael had succeeded his murdered -master, and was already beginning to fulfil the ruthless mission which -Elisha had foreseen with tears. Jehoram ben-Ahab seems to have held -his own against Hazael for a time; but in the course of the campaign -at Ramoth he was so severely wounded that he was compelled to leave -his army under the command of Jehu, and to return to Jezreel, to be -healed of his wounds. Thither his nephew Ahaziah of Judah went to -visit him; and there, as we shall hear, he too met his doom. That -fate, the Chronicler tells us, was the penalty of his iniquities. "The -destruction of Ahaziah was of God by coming to Joram." - -We have no ground for accusing either king of any want of courage; yet -it was obviously impolitic of Jehoram to linger unnecessarily in his -luxurious capital, while the army of Israel was engaged in service on -a dangerous frontier. The wounds inflicted by the Syrian archers may -have been originally severe. Their arrows at this time played as -momentous a part in history as the cloth-yard shafts of our English -bowmen which "sewed the French ranks together" at Poictiers, Crey, -and Azincour. But Jehoram had at any rate so far recovered that he -could ride in his chariot; and if he had been wise and bravely -vigorous, he would not have left his army under a subordinate at so -perilous an epoch, and menaced by so resolute a foe. Or if he were -indeed compelled to consult the better physicians at Jezreel, he -should have persuaded his nephew Ahaziah of Judah--who seems to have -been more or less of a vassal as well as a kinsman--to keep an eye on -the beleaguered fort. Both kings, however, deserted their -post,--Jehoram to recover perfect health; and Ahaziah, who had been -his comrade--as their father and grandfather had gone together to the -same war--to pay a state visit of condolence to the royal invalid. The -army was left under a popular, resolute, and wholly unscrupulous -commander, and the results powerfully affected the immediate and the -ultimate destiny of both kingdoms. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[141] The following genealogy may help to elucidate the troublesome -identity of names:-- - - OMRI - ____|____ - | | JEHOSHAPHAT - Ahab = Jezebel | - _______|__________________ | - | | | | - Ahaziah Jehoram Athaliah = Jehoram - (of Israel). (of Israel). | (of Judah). - | - Ahaziah - (of Judah). - - -[142] Jotham ben-Uzziah was not the colleague of his father, but his -public representative. - -[143] The only other king of Judah whose mother's name is not -mentioned (perhaps because his father Jotham had but one wife) is -Ahaz. - -[144] 2 Kings xi. 18; 2 Chron. xxi. 11, xxiv. 7. - -[145] Vulg., _Seira_; Arab., _Sa'ir_ (but the historian never uses the -name Mount Seir); LXX., [Greek: Sir]. There is perhaps some -corruption in the text, and the reading of the Chronicler "with his -princes" shows that it may have once been [Hebrew: tzam-sarav]. - -[146] 2 Kings viii. 21. "The people" (_i.e._, the army of Judah) "fled -to their tents." Apparently this means that they slunk away home. The -word "tents" is a reminiscence of their nomad days, like the -treasonable cry, "To your tents, O Israel." - -[147] Josh. x. 29-39. - -[148] Jos., _Antt._, IX. vi. 1. - - - - - CHAPTER XI - - _THE REVOLT OF JEHU_ - - B.C. 842 - - 2 KINGS ix. 1-37 - - "Te semper anteit sva Necessitas - Clavos trabales et cuneos manu, - Gestans ahen." - HORAT., _Od._, I. xxxv. 17. - - -A long period had elapsed since Elijah had received the triple -commission which was to mark the close of his career. Two of those -Divine behests had now been accomplished. He had anointed Elisha, son -of Shaphat, of Abel-Meholah, to be prophet in his room;[149] and -Elisha had anointed Hazael to be king over Syria;[150] the third and -more dangerous commission, involving nothing less than the overthrow -of the mighty dynasty of Omri, remained still unaccomplished. - -If the name of Jehu ("Jehovah is He")[151] had been actually mentioned -to Elijah, the dreadful secret must have remained buried in the breast -of the prophet and in that of his successor for many years. Further, -Jehu was yet a very young man, and to have marked him out as the -founder of a dynasty would have been to doom him to certain -destruction. An Eastern king, whose family has once securely seated -itself on the throne, is hedged round with an awful divinity, and -demands an unquestioning obedience. Elijah had been removed from earth -before this task had been fulfilled, and Elisha had to wait for his -opportunity. But the doom was passed, though the judgment was belated. -The sons of Ahab were left a space to repent, or to fill to the brim -the cup of their father's iniquities. - - "The sword of Heaven is not in haste to smite, - Nor yet doth linger." - -Ahaziah, Ahab's eldest son, after a reign of one year, marked only by -crimes and misfortunes, had ended in overwhelming disaster his -deplorable career. His brother Jehoram had succeeded him, and had now -been on the throne for at least twelve years, which had been chiefly -signalised by that unsuccessful attempt to recover the territory of -revolted Moab, to which we owe the celebrated Stone of Mesha. We have -already narrated the result of the campaign which had so many -vicissitudes. The combined armies of Israel, Judah, and Edom had been -delivered by the interposition of Elisha from perishing of thirst -beside the scorched-up bed of the Wady-el-Ahsy; and availing -themselves of the rash assault of the Moabites, had swept everything -before them. But Moab stood at bay at Kir-Haraseth (Kerak), his -strongest fortress, six miles from Ar or Rabbah, and ten miles east of -the southern end of the Dead Sea. It stood three thousand feet above -the level of the sea, and is defended by a network of steep valleys. -Nevertheless, Israel would have subdued it, but for the act of -horrible despair to which the King of Moab resorted in his extremity, -by offering up his eldest son as a burnt-offering to Chemosh upon the -wall of the city. Horror-stricken by the catastrophe, and terrified -with the dread that the vengeance of Chemosh could not but be aroused -by so tremendous a sacrifice, the besieging host had retired. From -that moment Moab had not only been free, but assumed the _rle_ of an -aggressor, and sent her marauding bands to harry and carry the farms -and homesteads of her former conqueror.[152] - -Then followed the aggressions of Benhadad which had been frustrated by -the insight of Elisha, and which owed their temporary cessation to his -generosity.[153] The reappearance of the Syrians in the field had -reduced Samaria to the lowest depths of ghastly famine. But the day of -the guilty city had not yet come, and a sudden panic, caused among the -invaders by a rumoured assault of Hittites and Egyptians, had saved -her from destruction.[154] Taking advantage of the respite caused by -the change of the Syrian dynasty, and pressing on his advantage, -Jehoram, with the aid of his Judan nephew, had once more got -possession of Ramoth-Gilead before Hazael was secure on the throne -which he had usurped. - -This then was the situation:--The allied and kindred kings of Israel -and Judah were idling in the pomp of hospitality at Jezreel; their -armies were encamped about Ramoth-Gilead; and at the head of the host -of Israel was the crafty and vehement grandson of Nimshi. - -Elisha saw and seized his opportunity. The day of vengeance from the -Lord had dawned. Things had not materially altered since the days of -Ahab. If Jehovah was nominally worshipped, if the very names of the -kings of Israel bore witness to His supremacy,[155] Baal was -worshipped too. The curse which Elijah had pronounced against Ahab and -his house remained unfulfilled. The credit of prophecy was at stake. -The blood of Naboth and his slaughtered sons cried to the Lord from -the ground; and hitherto it seemed to have cried in vain. If the -_Nebim_ (the prophetic class) were to have their due weight in -Israel, the hour had come, and the man was ready. - -The light which falls on Elisha is dim and intermittent. His name is -surrounded by a halo of nebulous wonders, of which many are of a -private and personal character. But he was a known enemy of Ahab and -his house. He had, indeed, more than once interposed to snatch them -from ruin, as in the expedition against Moab, and in the awful straits -of the siege of Samaria by the Syrians. But his person had none the -less been hateful to the sons of Jezebel, and his life had been -endangered by their bursts of sudden fury. He could hardly again have -a chance so favourable as that which now offered itself, when the -armed host was at one place and the king at another. Perhaps, too, he -may have been made aware that the soldiers were not well pleased to -find at their head a king who was so far a _fainant_ as to leave them -exposed to a powerful enemy, and show no eagerness to return. His -"urgent private affairs" were not so urgent as to entitle him to take -his ease at luxurious Jezreel. - -Where Elisha was at the time we do not know--perhaps at Dothan, -perhaps at Samaria. Suddenly he called to him a youth--one of the Sons -of the Prophets, on whose speed and courage he could rely--placed in -his hands a vial of the consecrated anointing oil,[156] told him to -gird up his loins,[157] and to speed across the Jordan to -Ramoth-Gilead. When he arrived, he was to bid Jehu rise up from the -company of his fellow-captains to hurry him into "a chamber within a -chamber,"[158] to shut the door for secrecy, to pour the consecrating -oil upon his head, to anoint him King of Israel in the name of -Jehovah, and then to fly without a moment's delay.[159] - -The messenger--the Rabbis guess that he was Jonah, the son of -Amittai[160]--knew well that his was a service of immense peril, in -which his life might easily pay the forfeit of his temerity. How was -he to guess that at once, without striking a blow, the host of Israel -would fling to the winds its sworn allegiance to the son of the -warrior Ahab, the fourth monarch of the powerful dynasty of Omri? -Might not any one of a thousand possible accidents thwart a conspiracy -of which the success depended on the unflinching courage and -promptitude of his single hand? - -He was but a youth, but he was the trained pupil of a master who had, -again and again, stood before kings, and not been afraid. He sprang -from a community which inherited the splendid traditions of the -Prophet of Flame. - -He did not hesitate a moment. He tightened the camel's hide round his -naked limbs, flung back the long dark locks of the Nazarite, and sped -upon his way. A true son of the schools of Jehovah's prophets has, and -can have, no fear of man. The armies of Israel and Judah saw the wild, -flying figure of a young man, with his hairy garment and streaming -locks, rush through the camp. Whatever might be their surmisings, he -brooked no questions. Availing himself of the awe with which the -shadow of Elijah had covered the sacrosanct person of a prophetic -messenger, he made his way straight to the war-council of the -captains; and brushing aside every attempt to impede his progress with -the plea that he was the bearer of Jehovah's message, he burst into -the council of the astonished warriors, who were assembled in the -private courtyard of a house in the fortress-town.[161] - -He knew the fame of Jehu, but did not know his person, and dared not -waste time. "I have an errand to thee, O captain," he said to the -assembly generally. The message had been addressed to no one in -particular, and Jehu naturally asked, "Unto which of all of us?" With -the same swift intuition which has often enabled men in similar -circumstances to recognise a leader--as Josephus recognised Vespasian, -and St. Severinus recognised Odoacer, and Joan of Arc recognised -Charles VI. of France--he at once replied, "To thee, O captain." Jehu -did not hesitate a moment. Prophets had shown, many a time, that their -messages might not be neglected or despised. He rose, and followed the -youth, who led him into the most secret recess of the house, and -there, emptying on his head the fragrant oil of consecration, said, -"Thus saith Jehovah, God of Israel, I have anointed thee king over -the people of Jehovah, even over Israel."[162] He was to smite the -house of his master Ahab in vengeance for the blood of Jehovah's -prophets and servants whom Jezebel had murdered. Ahab's house, every -male of it, young and old, bond and free,[163] is doomed to perish, as -the houses of Jeroboam and of Baasha had perished before them, by a -bloody end. Further, the dogs should eat Jezebel by the rampart of -Jezreel,[164] and there should be none to bury her. - -One moment sufficed for his daring deed, for his burning message; the -next he had flung open the door and fled. The soldiers of the camp must -have whispered still more anxiously together as they saw the same -agitated youth rushing through their lines with the same impetuosity -which had marked his entrance. In those dark days the sudden appearance -of a prophet was usually the herald of some terrific storm.[165] - -Jehu was utterly taken by surprise; but according to the reading -preserved by Ephraem Syrus in 2 Kings ix. 26, he had on the previous -night seen in a dream the blood of Naboth and his sons. If the thought -of revolt had ever passed for a moment through his mind, it had never -assumed a definite shape. True, he had been a warrior from his youth. -True, he had been one of Ahab's bodyguard, and had ridden before him -in a chariot at least twenty years earlier, and had now risen by -valour and capacity to the high station of captain of the host. True, -also, that he had heard the great curse which Elijah had pronounced on -Ahab at the door of Naboth's vineyard; but he heard it while he was -yet an obscure youth, and he had little dreamed that his was the hand -which should carry it into execution. Who was he? And had not the -house of Omri been, in some sense, sanctioned by Heaven? And were not -the words of the prophet "wild and wandering cries," of which the -issues might be averted by such a repentance as that of Ahab? - -And he felt another misgiving. Might not this scene be the plot of -some secret enemy? Might it not at any rate be a reckless jest palmed -upon him by his comrades? If any jealous member of the confederacy of -captains betrayed the fact that Jehu had tampered with their -allegiance, would his head be safe for a single hour? He would act -warily. He came back to his fellow-captains and said nothing. - -But they were burning with curiosity. Something must be impending. -Prophets did not rush in thus tumultuously for no purpose. Must not -the youth's mantle of hair be some standard of war? - -"Is all right?" they shouted. "Why did this frantic fellow come to -thee?"[166] - -"You know all about it," answered Jehu, with wary coolness. "You know -more about it than I do. You know the man, and what his talk was." - -"Lies!" bluntly answered the rough soldiers.[167] "Tell us now." - -Then Jehu's eye took measure of them and their feelings. A judge of -men and of men's countenances, he saw conspiracy flashing in their -faces. He saw that they suspected the true state of things, and were -on fire to carry it out. Perhaps they had caught sight of the vial of -oil under the youth's scant dress. Could any quickened observation at -least fail to notice that the soldier's dark locks were shining and -fragrant, as they had not been a moment ago, with consecrated oil? - -Then Jehu frankly told them the perilous secret. Thus and thus had the -young prophet spoken, and had said, "Thus saith Jehovah, I have -anointed thee king over Israel." - -The message was met with a shout of answering approbation. That shout -was the death-knell of the house of Omri. It showed that the reigning -dynasty had utterly forfeited its popularity. No luck had followed the -sons of Naboth's murderer. Israel was weary of their mother Jezebel. -Why was this king Jehoram, this king of evil auspices, who had been -repudiated by Moab and harried by Syria--why, in the first gleam of -possible prosperity, was he being detained at Jezreel by wounds which -rumour said were already sufficiently healed to allow him to return to -his post? Down with the seed of the murderer and the sorceress! Let -brave Jehu be king, as Jehovah has said! - -So the captains sprang to their feet, and then and there seized Jehu, -and carried him in triumph to the top of the stairs which ran round -the inside of the courtyard, and stripped off their mantles to -extemporise for him the semblance of a cushioned throne.[168] Then in -the presence of such soldiers as they could trust they blew a sudden -blast of the ram's horn, and shouted, "Jehu is king!" - -Jehu was not the man to let the grass grow under his feet. Nothing -tries a man's vigour and nerve so surely as a sudden crisis. It is -this swift resolution which has raised many a man to the throne, as it -raised Otho, and Napoleon I. and Napoleon III. The history of Israel -is specially full of _coups d'tat_, but no one of them is half so -decisive or overwhelming as this. Jehu instantly accepted the office -of Jehovah's avenger on the house of Ahab.[169] Everything, as Jehu -saw, depended on the suddenness and fury with which the blow was -delivered. "If you want me to be your king,"[170] he said, "keep the -lines secure, and guard the fortress walls. I will be my own messenger -to Jehoram. Let no deserter go forth to give him warning."[171] - -It was agreed; and Jehu, only taking with him Bidkar, his -fellow-officer, and a small band of followers, set forth at full speed -from Ramoth-Gilead. - -The fortress of Ramoth, now the important town of Es-Salt, a place -which must always have been the key of Gilead, was built on the -summit of a rocky headland, fortified by nature as well as by art. It -is south of the river Jabbok, and lies at the head of the only easy -road which runs down westward to the Jordan and eastward to the rich -plateau of the interior.[172] Crossing the fords of the Jordan, Jehu -would soon be able to join the main road, which, passing Tirzah, -Zaretan, and Beth-shean, and sweeping eastward of Mount Gilboa, gives -ready access to Jezreel. - -The watchman on the lofty watchtower of the summer palace caught sight -of a storm of dust careering along from the eastward up the valley -towards the city.[173] The times were wild and troublous. What could -it be? He shouted his alarm, "I see a troop!" The tidings were -startling, and the king was instantly informed that chariots and -horsemen were approaching the royal city. "Send a horseman to meet -them," he said, "with the message, 'Is all well?'" - -Forth flew the rider, and cried to the rushing escort, "The king asks, -'Is all well? Is it peace?'" For probably the anxious city hoped that -there might have been some victory of the army against Hazael, which -would fill them with joy. - -"What hast thou to do with peace? Turn thee behind me," answered Jehu; -and perforce the horseman, whatever may have been his conjectures, had -to follow in the rear. - -"He reached them," cried the sentry on the watchtower, "but he does -not return." - -The news was enigmatical and alarming; and the troubled king sent -another horseman. Again the same colloquy occurred, and again the -watchman gave the ominous message, adding to it the yet more -perplexing news that, in the mad and headlong driving[174] of the -charioteer, he recognises the driving of Jehu, the son of Nimshi.[175] - -What had happened to his army? Why should the captain of the host be -driving thus furiously to Jezreel? - -Matters were evidently very critical, whatever the swift approach of -chariots and horsemen might portend. "Yoke my chariot," said Jehoram; -and his nephew Ahaziah, who had shared his campaign, and was no less -consumed with anxiety to learn tidings which could not but be -pressing, rode by him in another chariot to meet Jehu. They took with -them no escort worth mentioning. The rebellion was not only sudden, -but wholly unexpected. - -The two kings met Jehu in a spot of the darkest omen. It was the plot -of ground which had once been the vineyard of Naboth, at the door of -which Ahab had heard from Elijah the awful message of his doom. As the -New Forest was ominous to our early Norman kings as the witness of -their cruelties and encroachments, so was this spot to the house of -Omri, though it was adjacent to their ivory palace, and had been -transformed from a vineyard into a garden or pleasance. - -"Is it peace, Jehu?" shouted the agitated king; by which probably he -only meant to ask, "Is all going well in the army at Ramoth?" - -The fierce answer which burst from the lips of his general fatally -undeceived him. "What peace," brutally answered the rebel, "so long as -the whoredoms of thy mother Jezebel and her witchcrafts are so many?" -She, after all, was the _fons et origo mali_ to the house of Jehoram. -Hers was the dark spirit of murder and idolatry which had walked in that -house. She was the instigator and the executer of the crime against -Naboth. She had been the foundress of Baal- and Asherah-worship; she was -the murderess of the prophets; she had been specially marked out for -vengeance in the doom pronounced both by Elijah and Elisha. - -The answer was unmistakable. This was a revolt, a revolution. -"Treachery, Ahaziah!" shouted the terrified king, and instantly wheeled -round his chariot to flee.[176] But not so swiftly as to escape the -Nemesis which had been stealing upon him with leaden feet, but now smote -him irretrievably with iron hand. Without an instant's hesitation, Jehu -snatched his bow from his attendant charioteer, "filled his hands with -it," and from its full stretch and resonant string sped the arrow, which -smote Jehoram in the back with fatal force, and passed through his -heart.[177] Without a word the unhappy king sank down upon his -knees[178] in his chariot, and fell face forward, dead. - -"Take him up," cried Jehu to Bidkar,[179] "and fling him down where he -is,--here in this portion of the field of Naboth the Jezreelite. Here, -years ago, you and I, as we rode behind Ahab,[180] heard Elijah utter -his oracle on this man's father, that vengeance should meet him here. -Where the dogs licked the blood of Naboth and his sons, let dogs lick -the blood of the son of Ahab."[181] - -But Jehu was not the man to let the king's murder stay his -chariot-wheels when more work had yet to be done. Ahaziah of Judah, -too, belonged to Ahab's house, for he was Ahab's grandson, and -Jehoram's nephew and ally. Without stopping to mourn or avenge the -tragedy of his uncle's murder, Ahaziah fled towards Bethgan or -Engannim,[182] the fountain of gardens, south of Jezreel, on the road -to Samaria and Jerusalem. Jehu gave the laconic order, "Smite him -also";[183] but fright added wings to the speed of the hapless King of -Judah. His chariot-steeds were royal steeds, and were fresh; those of -Jehu were spent with the long, fierce drive from Ramoth. He got as far -as the ascent of Gur before he was overtaken.[184] There, not far from -Ibleam, the rocky hill impeded his flight, and he was wounded by the -pursuers. But he managed to struggle onwards to Megiddo, on the south -of the plain of Jezreel, and there he hid himself.[185] He was -discovered, dragged out, and slain. Even Jehu's fierce emissaries did -not make war on dead bodies, any more than Hannibal did, or Charles V. -They left such meanness to Jehu himself, and to our Charles II. They -did not interfere with the dead king's remains. His servants carried -them to Jerusalem, and there he was buried with his fathers in the -sepulchre of the kings, in the city of David. As there was nothing -more to tell about him, the historian omits the usual formula about -the rest of the acts of Ahaziah, and all that he did. His death -illustrates the proverb _Mitgegangen mitgefangen_: he was the comrade -of evil men, and he perished with them. - -Jehu speedily reached Jezreel, but the interposition of Jehoram and -the orders for the pursuit of Ahaziah had caused a brief delay, and -Jezebel had already been made aware that her doom was imminent. - -Not even the sudden and dreadful death of her son, and the nearness of -her own fate, daunted the steely heart of the Tyrian sorceress. If she -was to die, she would meet death like a queen. As though for some -Court banquet, she painted her eyelashes and eyebrows with antimony, -to make her eyes look large and lustrous,[186] and put on her jewelled -head-dress.[187] Then she mounted the palace tower, and, looking down -through the lattice above the city gate, watched the thundering -advance of Jehu's chariot, and hailed the triumphant usurper with the -bitterest insult she could devise. She knew that Omri, her husband's -father, had taken swift vengeance on the guilt of the usurper Zimri, -who had been forced to burn himself in the harem at Tirzah after one -month's troubled reign. Her shrill voice was heard above the roar of -the chariot-wheels in the ominous taunt,-- - -"Is it peace, thou Zimri, thou murderer of thy master?"[188] - -No!--She meant, "There is no peace for thee nor thine, any more than for -me or mine! Thou mayest murder us; but thee too, thy doom awaiteth!" - -Stung by the ill-omened words, Jehu looked up at her and shouted,-- - -"Who is on my side? Who?" - -The palace was apparently rife with traitors. Ahab had been the first -polygamist among the kings of Israel, and therefore the first also to -introduce the odious atrocity of eunuchs. Those hapless wretches, the -portents of Eastern seraglios, the disgrace of humanity, are almost -always the retributive enemies of the societies of which they are the -helpless victims. Fidelity or gratitude are rarely to be looked for -from natures warped into malignity by the ruthless misdoing of men. -Nor was the nature of Jezebel one to inspire affection. One or two -eunuchs[189] immediately thrust out of the windows their bloated and -beardless faces. "Fling her down!" Jehu shouted. Down they flung the -wretched queen (has any queen ever died a death so shamelessly -ignominious?), and her blood spirted upon the wall, and on the horses. -Jehu, who had only stopped for an instant in his headlong rush, drove -his horses over her corpse,[190] and entered the gate of her capital -with his wheels crimson with her blood. History records scarcely -another instance of such a scene, except when Tullia, a century later, -drove her chariot over the dead body of her father Servius Tullius in -the _Vicus Sceleratus_ of ancient Rome.[191] - -But what cared Jehu? Many a conqueror ere now has sat down to the -dinner prepared for his enemy; and the obsequious household of the -dead tyrants, ready to do the bidding of their new lord, ushered the -hungry man to the banquet provided for the kings whom he had slain. No -man dreamt of uttering a wail; no man thought of raising a finger for -dead Jehoram or for dead Jezebel, though they had all been under _her_ -sway for at least five-and-thirty years. "The wicked perish, and no -man regardeth." "When the wicked perish, there is shouting."[192] - -We may be startled at a revolution so sudden and so complete; yet it -is true to history. A tyrant or a cabal may oppress a nation for long -years. Their word may be thought absolute, their power irresistible. -Tyranny seems to paralyse the courage of resistance, like the fabled -head of Medusa. Remove its fascination of corruption, and men become -men, and not machines, once more. Jehu's daring woke Israel from the -lethargy which had made her tolerate the murders and enchantments of -this Baal-worshipping alien. In the same way in one week Robespierre -seemed to be an invincible autocrat; the next week his power had -crumbled into dust and ashes at a touch. - -It was not until Jehu had sated his thirst and hunger after that wild -drive, which had ended in the murder of two kings and a queen and in -his sudden elevation to a throne, that it even occurred to this new -tiger-king to ask what had become of Jezebel. But when he had eaten -and drunk, he said, "Go, see now to this cursed woman, and bury her: -for she is a king's daughter." That she had been first Princess, then -Queen, then Gebrah in Israel for nearly a full lifetime was nothing: -it was nothing to Jehu that she was a wife, and mother, and -grandmother of kings and queens both of Israel and Judah;--but she was -also the daughter of Ethbaal, the priest-king of Tyre and Sidon, and -therefore any shameful treatment of her remains might kindle trouble -from the region of Phoenicia.[193] - -But no one had taken the trouble so much as to look after the corpse -of Jezebel. The populace of Jezreel were occupied with their new king. -Where Jezebel fell, there she had been suffered to lie; and no one, -apparently, cared even to despoil her of the royal robes, now -saturated with bloodshed. Flung from the palace-tower, her body had -fallen in the open space just outside the walls--what is called "the -mounds" of an Eastern city. In the strange carelessness of sanitation -which describes as "fate" even the visitation of an avoidable -pestilence, all sorts of offal are shot into this vacant space to -fester in the tropic heat. I myself have seen the pariah dogs and the -vultures feeding on a ghastly dead horse in a ruined space within the -street of Beit-Dejun; and the dogs and the vultures--"those national -undertakers"--had done their work unbidden on the corpse of the Tyrian -queen. When men went to bury her, they only found a few dog-mumbled -bones--the skull, and the feet, and the palms of the hands.[194] They -brought the news to Jehu as he rested after his feast. It did not by -any means discompose him. He at once recognised that another -levin-bolt had fallen from the thunder-crash of Elijah's prophecy, and -he troubled himself about the matter no further. Her carcase, as the -man of God had prophesied, had become as dung upon the face of the -field, so that none could say, "This is Jezebel."[195] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[149] 1 Kings xix. 15, 16. - -[150] 2 Kings viii. 12, 13. - -[151] The name was not uncommon, 1 Chron. ii. 38, iv. 35, xii. 3. - -[152] 2 Kings xiii. 20, xxiv. 2; Jer. xlviii. - -[153] 2 Kings vi. 8-23. - -[154] 2 Kings vii. 6. - -[155] Jehoram = Jehovah is exalted. Ahaziah = Jehovah holds. - -[156] Vial (_pak_) only here and in 1 Sam. x. 1. "_The_ oil" (LXX., -[Greek: ton phakon tou elaiou]). - -[157] "His habit fit for speed _succinct_" (Milton). - -[158] Inner chamber, 1 Kings xx. 30. - -[159] Perhaps, if Elisha had gone in person, suspicion might have been -aroused. He was not more than fifty at this time, and lived -forty-three years more. - -[160] _Seder Olam_, c. 18. - -[161] It seems as though they were _inside_ the town to defend it, not -a beleaguring host outside. - -[162] The expression is remarkable, as showing how completely the -prerogative of the Chosen People was supposed to rest with the Ten -Tribes, as the most important representatives of the seed of Abraham. - -[163] "Him that is shut up, and him that is left at large in Israel" -(2 Kings ix. 8; 1 Kings xiv. 10, xvi. 3, 4). - -[164] The A.V. has, less accurately, "in the _portion_ of Jezreel." -See 1 Kings xxi. 23. Heb., [Hebrew: chelek]. The [Hebrew: cheil] of an -Eastern town is the ditch and empty space--a sort of external -_pomoerium_ around it. It is the place of offal, and the haunt of -vultures and pariah dogs. - -[165] 1 Sam. xvi. 4: "Comest thou peaceably?" - -[166] 2 Kings ix. 11, [Hebrew: hammoshunnatz] LXX., [Greek: ho -hepilptos]. Comp. ver. 20, "he driveth _furiously_" ([Hebrew: -veshinnatzvn]). - -[167] Ver. 12, a lie! ([Hebrew: sheker]). - -[168] What is meant by the _gerem_ of the staircase is uncertain. The -word means "a bone" (Aquila, [Greek: ostdes]), and is, in this -connection, an [Greek: hapax legomenon]. The Targum explains it as the -top vane of a stair-dial. The margin of the R.V. renders it "on the bare -steps." The Vulgate renders it _in similitudinem tribunalis_, as though -_gerem_ meant _tselem_. The LXX. conceal their perplexity by simply -translating the word [Greek: epi to garem]. Grotius and Clericus, _in -fastigio graduum_. Symmachus, [Greek: epi mian tn anabathmidn]. - -[169] 2 Kings ix. 14: "So Jehu _conspired_ against Joram." The same -word is used in 2 Chron. xxiv. 25, 26. - -[170] 2 Kings ix. 15, R.V.: "If this be your mind." - -[171] So far as we know, he never returned to Ramoth-Gilead, of which -indeed we hear no more. - -[172] Tristram, _Land of Moab_. - -[173] Heb., _Shiph'hath_, "a dust-storm" (LXX., [Greek: koniorton, ai. -ochlon]; Vulg., _globum_), not as in A.V. and R.V., "a company." Comp. -Isa. lx. 6; Ezek. xxvi. 10. - -[174] Clearly the rendering "he driveth furiously" is right. The word -"furiously" is _beshigga'n_ (Vulg., _prceps_), and is connected with -"mad," ver. 11. LXX., [Greek: en parallag]. Arab. Chald., "quietly." -Josephus, "leisurely, and in good order." Such an approach would not, -however, have been at all in accordance with the perilous urgency of -his intent. - -[175] Jehu, the son of Jehoshaphat, is named from his grandfather -Nimshi, who seems to have been the founder of the greatness of his -house. - -[176] 2 Kings ix. 23: "Turned his hands." Comp. 1 Kings xxii. 34. - -[177] Ver. 24. Vulg., _inter scapulas_. - -[178] LXX., reading [Hebrew: brkav tzal]. - -[179] Bidkar, perhaps Bar-dekar, "Son of stabbing." Comp. 1 Kings iv. 9. - -[180] Heb., _ts'madim_, "in pairs"; LXX., [Greek: epibebkotes epi -zeug]. It is uncertain whether Jehu and Bidkar were in the same -chariot as Ahab, as Josephus says ([Greek: kathezomenous opisthen tou -harmatos]), or in a separate chariot. - -[181] 2 Kings ix. 26: "Saith the Lord." Ephraem Syrus omits these -words. He says that the night before Jehu had seen the blood of Naboth -and his sons in a dream. Comp. Hom., _Od._, iii. 258: [Greek: T ke -hoi oude thanonti chytn epi gaian echeuan 'All' ara tonge kynes te -kai oinoi katedapsan Keimenon en pedi]. - -[182] A.V., "By the way of the garden-house." LXX., [Greek: Baithgan]. - -[183] The text is a little uncertain. - -[184] Thenius supposes "Gur" to mean "a caravanserai." Comp. 2 Chron. -xxvi. 7, _Gur-Baal_; Vulg., _Hospitium Baalis_. - -[185] The account of the Chronicler (2 Chron. xxii. 9) differs from -that of the earlier historian. It may, however, be (uncertainly) -reconciled with it as in the text, if we suppose the words "he was hid -in Samaria" to mean in Megiddo, in the territory of Samaria. -Obviously, however, the traditions varied. There are difficulties -about the story, for Ibleam is on the west towards Megiddo, and not -between Jezreel and Samaria. - -[186] [Hebrew: puch], "Lead-glance." A mixture of pulverised antimony -(_stibium_) and zinc is still used by women in the East for this -purpose. _In calliblepharis dilatat oculos_ (Plin., _H. N._, xxxiii.). -Keren-Happuk, the name given by Job to one of his daughters, means -"horn of stibium." The object could hardly have been to _attract_ Jehu -(as Ephraem Syrus thinks), for Jezebel had already a _grandson_ -twenty-three years old (viii. 26). - -[187] A.V., "_Tired_ her head." Comp. _tiara_. Lit., "made good"; -LXX., [Greek: gathune]. - -[188] Josephus gives the sense very well: [Greek: Kalos doulos ho -apokteinas ton despotn] (_Antt._, IX. vi. 4). The same question might -have been addressed to Baasha, Shallum, Menahem, Pekah, and Hoshea; -but at least Jehu might plead a prophet's call. - -[189] "Two or three." Lit., "two three," like the old English "two -three" for "several." - -[190] Ver. 33. Heb., "He trod her underfoot." LXX., [Greek: -Synepatsan autn]; Vulg., _Conculcaverunt eam_. - -[191] Liv., i. 46-48. - -[192] Prov. xi. 10. Compare the remark of Voltaire, who saw "le peuple -ivr de vin et de joie de la mort de Louis XIV." - -[193] 1 Kings xvi. 31. At this time Ethbaal was dead. He reigned -probably from B.C. 940-908, and died at the age of sixty-eight (Jos., -_Antt._, VIII. xiii. 1, IX. vi. 6; _c. Ap._, i. 18). - -[194] 1 Kings xxi. 23. - -[195] Comp. Psalm lxxxiii. 10. Her name remained a by-word till the -latest days (Rev. ii. 20), and the Spanish Jews called their -persecutress Isabella the Catholic "Jezebel." - - - - - CHAPTER XII - - _JEHU ESTABLISHED ON THE THRONE_ - - B.C. 842-814 - - 2 KINGS x. 1-17 - - "The devil can quote Scripture for his purpose." - SHAKESPEARE. - - -But the work of Jehu was not yet over. He was established at Jezreel; -he was lord of the palace and seraglio of his master; the army of -Israel was with him. But who could be sure that no civil war would -arise, as between the partisans of Zimri and Omri, as between Omri and -Tibni? Ahab, first of the kings of Israel, had left many sons. There -were no less than seventy of these princes at Samaria. Might there not -be among them some youth of greater courage and capacity than the -murdered Jehoram? And could it be anticipated that the late dynasty -was so utterly unfortunate and execrated as to have none left to do -them reverence, or to strike one blow on their behalf, after more than -half a century of undisputed sway?[196] Jehu's _coup de main_ had been -brilliantly successful. In one day he had leapt into the throne. But -Samaria was strong upon its watch-tower hill. It was full of Ahab's -sons, and had not yet declared on Jehu's side. It might be expected -to feel some gratitude to the dynasty which Jehu had supplanted, -seeing that it owed to the grandfather of the king whom he had just -slain its very existence as the capital of Israel. - -He would put a bold face on his usurpation, and strike while the iron -was hot. He would not rouse opposition by seeming to assume that -Samaria would accept his rebellion. He therefore wrote a letter to the -rulers of Samaria[197]--which was but a journey of nine hours' -distance from Jezreel--and to the guardians of the young princes, -reminding them that they were masters in a strong city, protected with -its own contingent of chariots and horses, and well supplied with -armour. He suggested that they should select the most promising of -Ahab's sons, make him king, and begin a civil war on his behalf. - -The event showed how prudent was this line of conduct. As yet Jehu had -not transferred the army from Ramoth-Gilead. He had doubtless taken -good care to prevent intelligence of his plans from reaching the -adherents of Jehoram in Samaria. To them the unknown was the terrible. -All they knew was that "Behold, two kings stood not before him!" The -army must have sanctioned his revolt: what chance had they? As for -loyalty and affection, if ever they had existed towards this hapless -dynasty, they had vanished like a dream. The people of Samaria and -Jezreel had once been obedient as sheep to the iron dominance of -Jezebel. They had tolerated her idol-abominations, and the insolence -of her army of dark-browed priests. They had not risen to defend the -prophets of Jehovah, and had suffered even Elijah, twice over, to be -forced to flee for his life. They had borne, hitherto without a -murmur, the tragedies, the sieges, the famines, the humiliations, with -which during these reigns they had been familiar. And was not Jehovah -against the waning fortunes of the Beni-Omri? Elijah had undoubtedly -cursed them, and now the curse was falling. Jehu must doubtless have -let it be known that he was only carrying out the behest of their own -citizen the great Elisha, who had sent to him the anointing oil. They -could find abundant excuses to justify their defection from the old -house, and they sent to the terrible man a message of almost abject -submission:--Let him do as he would; they would make no king: they -were his servants, and would do his bidding. - -Jehu was not likely to be content with verbal or even written -promises. He determined, with cynical subtlety, to make them put a -very bloody sign-manual to their treaty, by implicating them -irrevocably in his rebellion. He wrote them a second mandate. - -"If," he said, "ye accept my rule, prove it by your obedience. Cut off -the heads of your master's sons, and see that they are brought to me -here to-morrow by yourselves before the evening." - -The ruthless order was fulfilled to the letter by the terrified -traitors. The king's sons were with their tutors, the lords of the city. -On the very morning that Jehu's second missive arrived, every one of -these poor guiltless youths was unceremoniously beheaded. The hideous, -bleeding trophies were packed in fig-baskets and sent to Jezreel.[198] - -When Jehu was informed of this revolting present it was evening, and he -was sitting at a meal with his friends.[199] He did not trouble himself -to rise from his feast or to look at "death made proud by pure and -princely beauty." He knew that those seventy heads could only be the -heads of the royal youths. He issued a cool and brutal order that they -should be piled in two heaps[200] until the morning on either side the -entrance of the city gates. Were they watched? or were the dogs and -vultures and hynas again left to do their work upon them? We do not -know. In any case it was a scene of brutal barbarism such as might have -been witnessed in living memory in Khiva or Bokhara;[201] nor must we -forget that even in the last century the heads of the brave and the -noble rotted on Westminster Hall and Temple Bar, and over the Gate of -York, and over the Tolbooth at Edinburgh, and on Wexford Bridge. - -The day dawned, and all the people were gathered at the gate, which -was the scene of justice. With the calmest air imaginable the warrior -came out to them, and stood between the mangled heads of those who but -yesterday had been the pampered minions of fortune and luxury. His -speech was short and politic in its brutality. "Be yourselves the -judges," he said. "Ye are righteous. Jezebel called me a Zimri. Yes! I -conspired against my master and slew him: but"--and here he casually -pointed to the horrible, bleeding heaps--"who smote all these?" The -people of Jezreel and the lords of Samaria were not only passive -witnesses of his rebellion; they were active sharers in it. They had -dabbled their hands in the same blood. Now they could not choose but -accept his dynasty: for who was there besides himself? And then, -changing his tone, he does not offer "the tyrant's devilish plea, -necessity," to cloak his atrocities, but--like a Romish inquisitor of -Seville or Granada--claims Divine sanction for his sanguinary -violence. This was not _his_ doing. He was but an instrument in the -hands of fate. Jehovah is alone responsible. He is doing what He spake -by His servant Elijah. Yes! and there was yet more to do; for no word -of Jehovah's shall fall to the ground. - -With the same cynical ruthlessness, and cold indifference to smearing -his robes in the blood of the slain, he carried out to the bitter end -his task of policy which he gilded with the name of Divine justice. -Not content with slaying Ahab's sons, he set himself to extirpate his -race, and slew all who remained to him in Jezreel, not only his kith -and kin, but every lord and every Baal-priest who favoured his house, -until he left him none remaining. - -But what a frightful picture do these scenes furnish us of the state -of religion and even of civilisation in Jezreel! There was this -man-eating tiger of a king wallowing in the blood of princes, and -enacting scenes which remind us of Dahomey and Ashantee, or of some -Tartary khanate where human hands are told out in the market-place -after some avenging raid. And amid all this savagery, squalor, and -Turkish atrocity, the man pleads the sanction of Jehovah, and claims, -unrebuked, that he is only carrying out the behests of Jehovah's -prophets! It is not until long afterwards that the voice of a prophet -is heard repudiating his plea and denouncing his bloodthirstiness. - - "An evil soul producing holy witness - Is like a villain with a smiling cheek-- - A goodly apple rotten at the core." - - -FOOTNOTES: - -[196] Omri, 12 years; Ahab, 22; Ahaziah, 18; Jehoram, 12. - -[197] The reading of 2 Kings x. 1, "Unto the rulers of _Jezreel_," is -clearly wrong. The LXX. reads, "Unto the rulers of Samaria." Unless -"Jezreel" be a clerical error for Israel, we must read, "He sent -letters from Jezreel unto the rulers of Samaria." - -[198] Fig-baskets, Jer. xxiv. 2. The word _dudim_ is rendered "pots" -in 1 Sam. ii. 14. LXX., [Greek: en kartallois]; Vulg., _in cophinis_. -In Psalm lxxxi. 6 the LXX. has [Greek: en t kophin]. - -[199] Jos., _Antt._, IX. vi. 5. - -[200] Heb., _Tsibourm_; LXX., [Greek: bounous]. - -[201] Comp. 1 Sam. xvii. 54; 2 Macc. xv. 30. - -[202] Hos. i. 4. - - - - - CHAPTER XIII - - _FRESH MURDERS--THE EXTIRPATION OF BAAL-WORSHIP_ - (B.C. 842) - - 2 KINGS x. 12-28 - - "Jhu, sur les hauts lieux, enfin osant offrir - Un tmraire encens que Dieu ne peut souffrir, - N'a pour servir sa cause et venger ses injures - Ni le coeur assez droit, ni les mains assez pures." - RACINE. - - -After such abject subservience had been shown him by the lords of -Samaria and Jezreel, Jehu evidently had no further shadow of -apprehension. He seems to have loved blood for its own sake--to have -been seized by a vertigo of blood-poisoning. Having waded through -slaughter to a throne, he loved to wash his footsteps in the blood of -the slain, and to stretch to the very uttermost--to stretch until it -cracked all its ravelled threads--the Divine sanction claimed by his -fanaticism or his hypocrisy. - -When he had finished his massacres at Jezreel, he went to Samaria. It -was only a journey of a few hours. On the high road he met a company -of travellers, whose escort and rich apparel showed that they were -persons of importance. They were about to halt, perhaps for -refreshment, at the shearing-house of the shepherds--the place in -which the sheep were gathered before they were shorn.[203] - -"Who are ye?" he asked. - -They answered that they were princes of the house of Judah, the brethren -of Ahaziah,[204] on their way to see the two kings at Jezreel, and to -salute their cousins, the children of Jehoram, and their kinsfolk the -children of Jezebel the Gebrah.[205] The answer sealed their fate. Jehu -ordered his followers to take them alive. At first he had not decided -what he would do with them. But half measures had now become impossible. -This cavalcade of princes little knew that they were on their way to -greet the dead children of a dead king and a dead queen. Jehu felt that -the possibilities of an endless _vendetta_ must be quenched in blood. He -gave orders to slay them, and there in one hour forty-two more scions of -the royal houses of Judah and Israel were done to death.[206] With the -usual reckless insouciance of the East, where any tank or well is made -the natural receptacle for corpses regardless of ultimate consequences, -their bodies were flung into the cistern of the shearing-house, in which -the sheep were washed before shearing, just as the bodies of Gedaliah's -followers were flung by Ishmael into the well at Mizpah, and the bodies -of our own murdered countrymen were flung into the well of Cawnpore. He -did not leave one of them alive. - -Thus Jehu "murdered two kings, and one hundred and twelve princes, and -gave Queen Jezebel to dogs to eat; and if priests had but noticed how -even Hosea condemns and denounces his savagery, they would have -abstained from some of their glorifications of assassins and butchers, -nor would they have appealed to this man's hideous example, as they -have done, to excuse some of their own revolting atrocities."[207] But - - "Crime was ne'er so black - As ghostly cheer and pious thanks to lack. - Satan is modest. At heaven's door he lays - His evil offspring, and in Scriptural phrase - And saintly posture gives to God the praise - And honour of his monstrous progeny."[208] - -One cruel deed more or less was nothing to Jehu. Leaving this tank -choked with death and incarnadined with royal blood, he went on his way -as if nothing particular had happened. He had not proceeded far when he -saw a man well known to him, and of a spirit kindred to his own. It was -the Arab ascetic and Nazarite Jehonadab, the son of Rechab (or "The -Rider"), the chief of the tribe of Kenites who had flung in their lot -with the children of Israel since the days of Moses.[209] It was the -tribe which had produced a Jael; and Jehonadab had something of the -fierce, fanatical spirit of the ancient chieftainess, who, in her own -tent, had dashed out with the tent-peg the brains of Sisera. His very -name, "The Lord is noble," indicated that he was a worshipper of -Jehovah, and his fierce zeal showed him to be a genuine Kenite. -Disgusted with the wickedness of cities, disgusted above all with the -loathly vice of drunkenness, which, as we see from the contemporary -prophets, had begun in this age to acquire fresh prominence in luxurious -and wealthy communities, he exacted of his sons a solemn oath that -neither they nor their successors would drink wine nor strong drink, and -that, shunning the squalor and corruption of cities, they would live in -tents, as their nomad ancestors had done in the days when Jethro and -Hobab were princes of pastoral Midian. We learn from Jeremiah, nearly -two and a half centuries later, how faithfully that oath had been -observed; and how, in spite of all temptation, the vow of abstinence was -maintained, even when the strain of foreign invasion had driven the -Rechabites into Jerusalem from their desolated pastures.[210] - -Jehu knew that the stern fanaticism of the Kenite Emr would rejoice -in his exterminating zeal, and he recognised that the friendship and -countenance of this "good man and just," as Josephus calls him, would -add strength to his cause, and enable him to carry out his dark -design. He therefore blessed him.[211] - -"Is thine heart right with my heart, as my heart is with thy heart?" -he asked, after he had returned the greeting of Jehonadab. - -"It is, it is!" answered the vehement Rechabite.[212] - -"Then give me thy hand," he said; and grasping the Arab by the -hand,[213] he pulled him up into his chariot--the highest distinction -he could bestow upon him--and bade him come and witness his zeal for -Jehovah. - -His first task on arriving at Samaria was to tear up the last fibres of -Ahab's kith and destroy all his partisans. This was indeed to push to a -self-interested extreme the denunciation which had been pronounced upon -Ahab; but the crime helped to secure his fiercely founded throne. - -One deep-seated plot was yet unaccomplished. It was the total -extermination of Baal-worship. To drive out for ever this orgiastic, -corrupt, and alien idolatry was right; but there is nothing to show -that Jehu would have been unable to effect this purpose by one stern -decree, together with the destruction of Baal's images and temple. A -method so simply righteous did not suit this Nero-Torquemada, who -seemed to be never happy unless he united Jesuitical cunning with the -pouring out of rivers of massacre. - -He summoned the people together; and as though he now threw off all -pretence of zeal for orthodoxy, he proclaimed that Ahab had served -Baal a little, but Jehu would serve him much. The Samaritans must have -been endowed with infinite gullibility if they could suppose that the -king who had ridden into the city side by side with such a man as -Jehonadab--"the warrior in his coat of mail, the ascetic in his shirt -of hair"--who had already exhibited an unfathomable cunning, and had -swept away the Baal-priests of Jezreel, was indeed sincere in this new -conversion.[214] Perhaps they felt it dangerous to question the -sincerity of kings. The Baal-worshippers of former days were known, -and Jehu proclaimed that if any one of them was missing at the great -sacrifice which he intended to offer to Baal he should be put to -death. A solemn assembly to Baal was proclaimed, and every apostate -from God to nature-worship from all Israel was present, till the -idol's temple was thronged from end to end.[215] To add splendour to -the solemnity, Jehu bade the wardrobe-keeper to bring out all the rich -vestments of Tyrian dye and Sidonian broidery, and clothe the -worshippers.[216] Solemnly advancing to the altar with the Rechabite -by his side, he warned the assembly to see that their gathering was -not polluted by the presence of a single known worshipper of Jehovah. -Then, apparently, he still further disarmed suspicion by taking a -personal part in offering the burnt-offering. Meanwhile, he had -surrounded the temple and blocked every exit with eighty armed -warriors, and had threatened that any one of them should be put to -death if he let a single Baal-worshipper escape. When he had finished -the offering,[217] he went forth, and bade his soldiers enter, and -slay, and slay, and slay till none were left. Then flinging the -corpses in a heap, they made their way to the fortress of the Temple, -where some of the priests may have taken refuge. They dragged out and -burnt the _matstseboth_ of Baal,[218] broke down the great central -idol, and utterly dismantled the whole building. To complete the -pollution of the dishallowed shrine, he made it a common midden for -Samaria, which it continued to be for centuries afterwards.[219] It -was his last voluntary massacre. The House of Ahab was no more. -Baal-worship in Israel never survived that exterminating blow. - -Happily for the human race, such atrocities committed in the name of -religion have not been common. In Pagan history we have but few -instances, except the slaughter of the Magians at the beginning of the -reign of Darius, son of Hystaspes. Alas that other parallels should be -furnished by the abominable tyranny of a false Christianity, blessed -and incited by popes and priests! The persecutions and massacres of -the Albigenses, preached by Arnold of Citeaux, and instigated by Pope -Innocent III.; the expulsion of the Jews from Spain; the deadly work -of Torquemada; the murderous furies of Alva among the hapless -Netherlanders, urged and approved by Pope Pius V.; the massacre of -St. Bartholomew, for which Pope Gregory and his cardinals sang their -horrible Te Deum in their desecrated shrines,--these are the parallels -to the deeds of Jehu. He has found his chief imitators among the -votaries of a blood-stained and usurping sacerdotalism, which has -committed so many crimes and inflicted so many horrors on mankind. - -And did God approve all this detestable mixture of zealous enthusiasm -with lying deceit and the insatiate thirst of blood? - -If right be right, and wrong be wrong, the answer must not be an -elaborate subterfuge, but an uncompromising "No!" We need be under no -doubt on that subject. Christ Himself reproved His Apostles for savage -zealotry, and taught them that the Elijah-spirit was not the -Christ-spirit. Nor is the Elisha-spirit the Christian spirit any the -more if these deeds of hypocrisy and blood were in any sense approved -by him who is sometimes regarded as the mild and gentle Elisha. Where -was he? Why was he silent? Could he possibly approve of this -murderer's fury? We do not, indeed, know how far Elisha lent his -sanction to anything more than the general end. Ahab's house had been -doomed to vengeance by the voice which gave utterance to the verdict -of the national conscience. The doom was just; Jehu was ordained to be -the executioner. In no other way could the judgment be carried out. -The times were not sentimental. The murder of Jehoram was not regarded -as an act of tyrannicide, but of divinely commissioned justice. Elisha -_may_ have shrunk from the unreined furies of the man whom he had sent -his emissary to anoint. On the other hand, we have not the least proof -that he did so. He partook, probably, of the wild spirit of the -times, when such deeds were regarded with feelings very different from -the abhorrence with which we, better taught by the spirit of love, and -more enlightened by the widening dawn of history, now justly regard -them. No remonstrance of _contemporary_ prophecy, however faint, is -recorded as having been uttered against the doings of Jehu. The fact -that, several centuries later, they could be recorded by the historian -without a syllable of reprobation shows that the education of nations -in the lessons of righteousness is slow, and that we are still amid -the annals of the deep night of moral imperfection. But the nation was -on the eve of purer teaching, and in the prophets Amos and Hosea we -read the clear condemnation of deeds of cruelty in general, and -specially of the king who felt no pity. Amos condemns even the -idolatrous King of Edom, "because he did pursue his brother with the -sword, and did cast off all pity, and his anger did tear perpetually, -and he kept his wrath for ever."[220] He condemns no less severely the -Chemosh-worshipping King of Moab even for an insult done to the dead: -"Because he burned the bones of the King of Edom into lime."[221] Jehu -had warred pitilessly upon the living, and had shamelessly insulted -the dead. He had flung the heads of seventy princes in two bleeding -heaps on the common road for all eyes to stare upon, and he had -polluted the cistern of Beth-equed-haroim with the dead bodies of -forty-two youths of the royal house of Judah. He might plead that he -was but carrying out to the full the commission of Jehovah, imposed -upon him by Elisha; but Hosea, a century later, gives God's message -against his house: "Yet a little while, and I will avenge the blood -of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu, and will cause to cease the kingdom -of the house of Israel."[222] - -Nay, more! If, as is possible, the ghastly story of the siege of -Samaria, narrated in the memoirs of Elisha, is displaced, and if it -really belongs to the reign of Jehoahaz ben-Jehu, then Elisha himself -brands the cruelty of the rushing thunderbolt of vengeance which his -own hand had launched. For he calls the unnamed "King of Israel" "the -son of a murderer." - -Men who are swords of God, and human executioners of Divine justice, -may easily deceive themselves. God works the ends of His own -providence, and He uses their ministry. "The fierceness of man shall -turn to Thy praise, and the fierceness of them shalt Thou -refrain."[223] But they can never make their plea of prophetic -sanction a cloak of maliciousness. Cromwell had stern work to do. -Rightly or wrongly, he deemed it inevitable, and did not shrink from -it. But he hated it. Over and over again, he tells us, he had prayed -to God that He would not put him to this work. To the best of his -power he avoided, he minimised, every act of vengeance, even when the -sternness of his Puritan sense of righteousness made him look on it as -duty. Far different was the case of Jehu. He loved murder and cunning -for their own sakes, and, like Joab, he dyed the garments of peace -with the blood of war. - -How little was his gain! It had been happier for him if he had never -mounted higher than the captaincy of the host, or even so high. He -reigned for twenty-eight years (842-814)--longer than any king except -his great-grandson Jeroboam II.; and in recognition of any element of -righteousness which had actuated his revolt, his children, even to the -fourth generation, were suffered to sit upon the throne. His dynasty -lasted for one hundred and thirteen years.[224] But his own reign was -only memorable for defeat, trouble, and irreparable disaster. - -For Hazael, who had seized the throne of his murdered lord Benhadad, -was a fierce and able warrior. He held his own against the overweening -might of his northern neighbour Assyria; and whenever he obtained a -respite from this desperate warfare, he indemnified himself for all -losses by enlarging his dominion out of the territories of the Ten -Tribes. "In those days the Lord began to cut Israel short, and Hazael -smote them in all the borders of Israel." Jehu had the mortification -of seeing the fairest and most fruitful regions of his dominion, those -which had belonged to Israel from the most ancient times, wrenched out -of his grasp. From this time forwards Israel lost half the fair -Promised Land which God had given to their fathers. It was the -beginning of the end. Henceforth the tribal inheritance of Reuben, -Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh was an oppressed dependency of -Aram. Hazael overran and annexed the land of Bashan from the spurs of -Mount Hermon to the Lake of Gennezareth; Gaulan, and volcanic Argob, -and Hauran the entire ancient kingdom of Og, King of Bashan, with all -the herds and pasture-lands. Southward of this he seized the whole -forest-clad plateau of Gilead, with its lovely ravines, north of the -Jabbok, the territory of Gad; and pushing still southward, -established his sway over the district, of the Ammonites and the tribe -of Reuben, as far as the city of Aroer, on the other side of the great -chasm of Arnon (Wady Mojib). All the fatness of Bashan and Rabbah with -her watery plain of the Beni-Ammon, and the grass-covered uplands -which fed the enormous flocks of Mesha, the great Emr and -sheep-master of Moab, passed from Israel to Syria, never to be -recovered. What made the humiliation more terrible was that the -invasion and conquest were accompanied with acts of unwonted cruelty. -Elisha had wept to think what evil Hazael would do the children of -Israel[225]--how he would set their strongholds on fire, and slay -their young men with the sword, and dash in pieces their little ones, -and rip up their women with child. These atrocities were in those -horrible days the ordinary incidents of warfare;[226] but Hazael seems -to have been pre-eminent in brutal fierceness. It was this which -called down on him and his people the "burdens" of Amos. "Thus saith -the Lord; For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four, I will -not turn away the punishment thereof; because they have threshed -Gilead with threshing instruments of iron: but I will send a fire into -the house of Hazael, which shall devour the palaces of Benhadad."[227] - -We can imagine rather than describe the anguish of Jehu when he was -compelled to look impotently on, while his powerful Syrian neighbour -laid waste his dominion with fire and sword, and the cry of his -despoiled and slaughtered subjects was uplifted to him in vain. Nor -was this all. Emboldened by these reverses, a host of other enemies, -once subjugated and despised, began to wreak their revenge and -insolence on humbled Israel. The Philistines eagerly undertook the -sale of the wretched captives who were brought to them in gangs from -the burnt Trans-Jordanic towns.[228] The old "brotherly covenant" with -the Tyrian, which had once been formed by Solomon, and had been -cemented by the marriage of Jezebel with Ahab, was cancelled by Jehu's -insults, and the Tyrians emulously outbad the Philistines in the -purchase of Israelitish slaves. The Edomites and the Ammonites also -helped Hazael in his marauding raids, and enlarged their own domains -at the expense of Samaria. Such insults and humiliations might well go -far to break the heart of an impetuous and warrior-king. - -Of Jehu the Books of Kings and Chronicles have no more to tell us, but -we gain fresh insight into his degradation from the Black Obelisk of -Shalmaneser II. (860-824), now in the British Museum. From the -inscription we find that, in 842, Jehu--"the son of Omri," as he is -erroneously called--was one of the vassal kings who subjected -themselves to the Assyrian conqueror,[229] and sent him tribute, which -may have euphemistically passed under the name of presents. The -despot of Nineveh twice speaks of it as a tribute. On this obelisk we -see a picture of Jehu's ambassadors--perhaps of Jehu himself. On the -left stands the Assyrian King with the winged circle over his head. He -holds a beaker of wine in his hand, and two eunuchs stand behind him, -one of whom covers him with a sunshade. Before him kneels and grovels -in adoration the Jewish King, with his beard sweeping the ground. In -long array behind him come his servants--first two eunuchs, then a -number of bearded figures, who carry the tribute. They are dressed in -long richly fringed robes, exactly resembling those of the Assyrians -themselves, and they wear shoes which turn up at the toes. They are -carrying figures of gold and silver, goblets, golden vessels, ingots -of precious metals, spear-shafts, a kingly sceptre, baskets, bags, and -trays of treasure, the contribution of which must have fallen with -crushing weight on the impoverished kingdom.[230] - -This tribute must have been sent in 842, the eighteenth year of -Shalmaneser II.'s reign. Doubtless Jehu thought he might be delivered -from his furious neighbour Hazael by propitiating the Northern tyrant, -who at the same time received the submission of the Tyrians and -Sidonians. But if so, Jehu's hopes were dashed to the ground. -Shalmaneser was the enemy of Hazael (Ha-sa-ilu), who had gone out to -meet him at Antilibanus, and there had fought a desperate battle. The -Syrian King was routed, and driven back, and Shalmaneser had besieged -Damascus. But he had failed to take it, and indeed had not troubled -Syria again till 832, when he made an excursion of minor importance. -His troubles on the north and east of Assyria had diverted his -attention from Damascus; and this, together with the inferiority of -his son Samsiniras (_d._ 811), had given Hazael a free hand to avenge -himself on Israel as the ally of Assyria. Of Jehu we hear no more. -After his long reign of twenty-eight years he slept with his fathers, -and was buried in Samaria, and Jehoahaz his son reigned in his stead. -Savage as had been his measures, his victory over alien idolatries was -by no means complete. What Micah calls "the statutes of Omri, and the -works of the House of Ahab,"[231] were still kept; and men, both in -Israel and Judah, walked in their old sins. Even in the reign of -Jehu's own son Jehoahaz there still remained in Samaria the Asherah, -or tree consecrated to the nature-goddess, which Jehu seems to have -put away, but not to have destroyed.[232] As he grovelled in the dust -before Shalmaneser, did no memory of his own ferocities darken his -humiliated soul? Must not he, like our Henry II., have been inclined -to utter the wailing cry, "Shame, shame on a conquered king!" - -FOOTNOTES: - -[203] 2 Kings x. 12. The shepherds House of Meeting -(_Beth-equed-haroim_). LXX., [Greek: en Baithakath]; Vulg., _ad -cameram pastorum_; Aquila, [Greek: oikos kampses]. It has been -conjectured by Klostermann that it belonged to the Rechabites, that -they had been persecuted by Jezebel, and that they were glad to help -in taking vengeance on her descendants. - -[204] The Chronicler (2 Chron. xxii. 8) says "_sons_ of the brethren -of Ahaziah." - -[205] LXX., [Greek: h dynasteuousa]. - -[206] 2 Kings x. 14, A.V., "at the pit." Lit., "in" or "into the -cistern." - -[207] See Martin, _Hist. de France_, ix. 114. - -[208] Whittier. - -[209] Jer. xxxv. 1-19. Josephus (_Antt._, IX. vi. 6) calls him "a good -man and a just, who had long been a friend of Jehu." "He was," says -Ewald (_Gesch._, iii. 543), "of a society of those who despaired of -being able to observe true religion undisturbedly in the midst of the -nation with the stringency with which they understood it, and -therefore withdrew into the desert." - -[210] Jer. xxxv. (written about B.C. 604). Communities of Nazarites -seem to have sprung up at this epoch, perhaps as a protest against the -prevailing luxury (Amos ii. 11). - -[211] In Josephus it is Jehonadab who blesses the king. - -[212] Heb., [Hebrew: yesh vayesh]. - -[213] Striking hands was a sign of good faith (Job xvii. 3; Prov. -xxii. 26). - -[214] He did it "in subtilty" ([Hebrew: vetzakevah]). This substantive -occurs nowhere else, but is connected with the name Jacob. LXX., -[Greek: en pternism], "in taking by the heel," with reference to the -name Jacob, "supplanter." - -[215] Lit., "mouth to mouth." LXX., [Greek: stoma eis stoma]. - -[216] Ver. 22, [Hebrew: melhahah], _Vestiarum_, occurs here only. The -LXX. omits it or puts it in Greek letters. Targum, [Greek: kamptrai], -"chests" Sil. Italicus (iii. 23) describes the robes of the priests of -the Gaditanian Hercules,-- - - "_Nec discolor ulli, - Ante aras cultus; velantur corpora lino - Et Pelusiaco prfulget stamine vertex._" - KEIL, _ad loc._ - -It was a mixture of "the rich dye of Tyre and the rich web of Nile." - -[217] The phrase may be impersonal, "when one [_i.e._, they] had -finished the sacrifice"; but the narrative seems to imply that Jehu -offered it himself (LXX., [Greek: hs synetelesan poiountes tn -holokautsin] Vulg., _cum completum esset holocaustum_). - -[218] A.V., images; R.V., pillars. - -[219] Comp. Ezra vi. 11; Dan. ii. 5. - -[220] Amos i. 11. - -[221] Amos ii. 1. - -[222] Hos. i. 4. - -[223] Psalm lxxvi. 10. - -[224] - - Jehu 842-814. - Jehoahaz 814-797. - Joash 797-781. - Jeroboam II. 781-740. - Zechariah 740. - -[225] 2 Kings viii. 12. - -[226] Isa. xiii. 11-16; Hos. x. 14, xiii. 16; Nah. iii. 10. - -[227] Amos i. 3, 4. - -[228] Amos i. 6-15. - -[229] See Appendix I., Schrader, _Keilinschriften u. das Alte Test._, -208 ff.; Sayce, _Records of the Past_, v. 41; Layard, _Nineveh_, p. -613; Rawlinson, _Herodotus_, i. 469. He is twice mentioned in -inscriptions of Shalmaneser II. (861-825). He is called Ja-hu-a, son -of Omri. The name of Omri was familiar in Nineveh; for Ahab had fought -as a vassal of Assyria at the battle of Karkar, and Samaria was called -Beth-Khumri. Shalmaneser would not trouble himself with the fact that -Jehu had extirpated the old dynasty. His black stl was found by -Layard, and is figured in _Monuments of Nineveh_, i., pl. 53. The name -of Jehu was first deciphered by Dr. Hincks in 1851. - -[230] Schrader (E. T.), ii. 199. - -[231] Mic. vi. 16. - -[232] 2 Kings xiii. 6. - - - - - CHAPTER XIV - - _ATHALIAH_ (B.C. 842-836)--_JOASH BEN-AHAZIAH OF - JUDAH_ (B.C. 836-796) - - 2 KINGS xi. 1-xii. 21 - - "Par cette fin terrible, et due ses forfaits, - Apprenez, Roi des Juifs, et n'oubliez jamais, - Que les rois dans le ciel ont un juge sevre, - L'innocence un vengeur, et les orphelins un pre!" - RACINE, _Athalie_. - - "Regardless of the sweeping whirlwind's sway, - That, hushed in grim repose, expects its evening prey." - GRAY. - - -Before we follow the destinies of the House of Jehu we must revert to -Judah, and watch the final consequences of ruin which came in the -train of Ahab's Tyrian marriage, and brought murder and idolatry into -Judah, as well as into Israel. - -Athaliah, who, as queen-mother, was more powerful than the queen-consort -(_malekkah_), was the true daughter of Jezebel. She exhibits the same -undaunted fierceness, the same idolatrous fanaticism, the same swift -resolution, the same cruel and unscrupulous wickedness. - -It might have been supposed that the miserable disease of her husband -Jehoram, followed so speedily by the murder, after one year's reign, -of her son Ahaziah, might have exercised over her character the -softening influence of misfortune. On the contrary, she only saw in -these events a short path to the consummation of her ambition. - -Under Jehoram she had been queen: under Ahaziah she had exercised -still more powerful influence as Gebrah, and had asserted her sway -alike over her husband and over her son, whose counsellor she was to -do wickedly. It was far from her intention tamely to sink from her -commanding position into the abject nullity of an aged and despised -dowager in a dull provincial seraglio. She even thought that - - "To reign is worth ambition, though in hell; - Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven." - -The royal family of the House of David, numerous and flourishing as it -once was, had recently been decimated by cruel catastrophes. Jehoram, -instigated probably by his heathen wife, had killed his six younger -brothers.[233] Later on, the Arabs and Philistines, in their insulting -invasion, had not only plundered his palace, but had carried away his -sons; so that, according to the Chronicler, "there was never a son -left him, save Jehoahaz [_i.e._, Ahaziah], the youngest of his -sons."[234] He may have had other sons after that invasion; and -Ahaziah had left children, who must all, however, have been very -young, since he was only twenty-two or twenty-three when Jehu's -servants murdered him. Athaliah might naturally have hoped for the -regency; but this did not content her. When she saw that her son -Ahaziah was dead, "she arose and destroyed all the seed royal." In -those days the life of a child was but little thought of; and it -weighed less than nothing with Athaliah that these innocents were her -grandchildren. She killed all of whose existence she was aware, and -boldly seized the crown. No queen had ever reigned alone either in -Israel or in Judah. Judah must have sunk very low, and the talents of -Athaliah must have been commanding, or she could never have -established a precedent hitherto undreamed of, by imposing on the -people of David for six years the yoke of a woman, and that woman a -half-Phoenician idolatress. Yet so it was! Athaliah, like her cousin -Dido, felt herself strong enough to rule. - -But a woman's ruthlessness was outwitted by a woman's cunning. Ahaziah -had a half-sister on the father's side,[235] the princess Jehosheba, -or Jehoshabeath, who was then or afterwards (we are told) married to -Jehoiada, the high priest.[236] The secrets of harems are hidden deep, -and Athaliah may have been purposely kept in ignorance of the birth to -Ahaziah of a little babe whose mother was Zibiah of Beersheba, and who -had received the name of Joash. If she knew of his existence, some -ruse must have been palmed off upon her, and she must have been led to -believe that he too had been killed. But he had not been killed. -Jehosheba "stole him from among the king's sons that were slain," and, -with the connivance of his nurse, hid him from the murderers sent by -Athaliah in the palace store-room in which beds and couches were -kept.[237] Thence, at the first favourable moment, she transferred the -child and nurse to one of the chambers in the three storeys of -chambers which ran round the Temple, and were variously used as -wardrobes or as dwelling-rooms. - -The hiding-place was safe; for under Athaliah the Temple of Jehovah -fell into neglect and disrepute, and its resident ministers would not -be numerous. It would not have been difficult, in the seclusion of -Eastern life, for Jehosheba to pass off the babe as her own child to -all but the handful who knew the secret. - -Six years passed away, and the iron hand of Athaliah still kept the -people in subjection. She had boldly set up in Judah her mother's -Baal-worship. Baal had his temple not far from that of Jehovah; and -though Athaliah did not imitate Jezebel in persecuting the worshippers -of Jehovah, she made her own high priest, Mattan, a much more -important person than Jehoiada for all who desired to propitiate the -favours of the Court. - -Joash had now reached his seventh year, and a Jewish prince in his -seventh year is regarded as something more than a mere child. Jehoiada -thought that it was time to strike a blow in his favour, and to -deliver him from the dreadful confinement which made it impossible for -him to leave the Temple precincts. - -He began secretly to tamper with the guards both of the Temple and of -the palace. Upon the Levitic guards, indignant at the intrusion of -Baal-worship, he might securely count, and the Carites and queen's -runners were not likely to be very much devoted to the rule of the -manlike and idolatrous alien-queen. Taking an oath of them in secrecy, -he bound them to allegiance to the little boy whom he produced from the -Temple chamber as their lawful lord, and the son of their late king. - -The plot was well laid. There were five captains of the five hundred -royal body-guards, and the priest secretly enlisted them all in the -service.[238] The Chronicler says that he also sent round to all the -chief Levites, and collected them in Jerusalem for the emergency. The -arrangements of the Sabbath gave special facility to his plans; for on -that day only one of the five divisions of guards mounted watch at the -palace, and the others were set free for the service of the Temple.[239] -It had evidently been announced that some great ceremony would be held -in the shrine of Jehovah; for all the people, we are told, were -assembled in the courts of the house of the Lord. Jehoiada ordered one -of the companies to guard the palace; another to be at the "gate Sur," -or the gate "of the Foundation";[240] another at the gate behind the -barracks(?) of the palace-runners, to be a barrier[241] against any -incursion from the palace. Two more were to ensure the safety of the -little king by watching the precincts of the Temple. The Levitic -officers were to protect the king's person with serried ranks. Jehoiada -armed them with spears and shields, which David had placed as trophies -in the porch; and if any one tried to force his way within their lines -he was to be slain. The only danger to be apprehended was from any -Carite mercenaries, or palace-servants of the queen: among all others -Jehoiada found a widespread defection. The people, the Levites, even the -soldiers, all hated the Baal-worshipping usurper.[242] - -At the fateful moment the guards were arranged in two dense lines, -beginning from either side of the porch, till their ranks met beyond the -altar, so as to form a hedge round the royal boy. Into this triangular -space the young prince was led by the high priest, and placed beside the -_Matstsebah_--some prominent pillar in the Temple court, either one of -Solomon's pillars Jachin and Boaz, or some special erection of later -days.[243] Round him stood the princes of Judah, and there, in the midst -of them, Jehoiada placed the crown upon his head, and in significant -symbol also laid lightly upon it for a moment "The Testimony"--perhaps -the Ten Commandments and the Book of the Covenant--the most ancient -fragment of the Pentateuch[244]--which was treasured up with the pot of -manna inside or in front of the Ark. Then he poured on the child's head -the consecrated oil, and said, "Let the king live!" - -The completion of the ceremony was marked by the blare of the rams' -horns, the softer blast of the silver trumpets, and the answering shouts -of the soldiers and the people. The tumult, or the news of it, reached -the ears of Athaliah in the neighbouring palace, and, with all the -undaunted courage of her mother, she instantly summoned her escort, and -went into the Temple to see for herself what was taking place.[245] She -probably mounted the ascent which Solomon had made from the palace to -the Temple court, though it had long been robbed of its precious metals -and scented woods. She led the way, and thought to overawe by her -personal ascendency any irregularity which might be going on; for in the -deathful hush to which she had reduced her subjects she does not seem to -have dreamt of rebellion. No sooner had she entered than the guards -closed behind her, excluding and menacing her escort.[246] - -A glance was sufficient to reveal to her the significance of the whole -scene. There, in royal robes, and crowned with the royal crown, stood -her little unknown grandson beside the _Matstsebah_,[247] while round -him were the leaders of the people and the trumpeters, and the -multitudes were still rolling their tumult of acclamation from the court -below. In that sight she read her doom. Rending her clothes, she turned -to fly, shrieking, "Treason! treason!" Then the commands of the priest -rang out: "Keep her between the ranks,[248] till you have got her -outside the area of the Temple; and if any of her guards follow or try -to rescue her, kill him with the sword. But let not the sacred courts be -polluted with her blood." So they made way for her,[249] and as she -could not escape she passed between the rows of Levites and soldiers -till she had reached the private chariot-road by which the kings drove -to the precincts.[250] There the sword of vengeance fell. Athaliah -disappears from history, and with her the dark race of Jezebel. But her -story lives in the music of Handel and the verse of Racine. - -This is the only recorded revolution in the history of Judah. In two -later cases a king of Judah was murdered, but in both instances "the -people of the land" restored the Davidic heir. Life in Judah was less -dramatic and exciting than in Israel, but far more stable;[251] and -this, together with comparative immunity from foreign invasions, -constituted an immense advantage. - -Jehoiada, of course, became regent for the young king, and continued -to be his guide for many years, so that even the king's two wives were -selected by his advice. As the nation had been distracted with -idolatries, he made the covenant between the king and the people that -they should be loyal to each other, and between Jehoiada and the king -and the people that they should be Jehovah's people. Such covenants -were not infrequent in Jewish history. Such a covenant had been made -by Asa[252] after Abijam's apostasy, as it was afterwards made by -Hezekiah[253] and by Josiah.[254] The new covenant, and the sense of -awakenment from the dream of guilty apostasy, evoked an outburst of -spontaneous enthusiasm in the hearts of the populace. Of their own -impulse they rushed to the temple of Baal which Athaliah had reared, -dismantled it, and smashed to pieces his altars and images. The riot -was only stained by a single murder. They slew Mattan, Athaliah's -Baal-priest, before the altars of his god.[255] - -With Jehoiada begins the title of "high priest." Hitherto no higher -name than "the priest" had been given even to Aaron, or Eli, or Zadok; -but thenceforth the title of "chief priest" is given to his -successors, among whom he inaugurated a new epoch.[256] - -It was now Jehoiada's object to restore such splendour and solemnity -as he could to the neglected worship of the Temple, which had suffered -in every way from Baal's encroachments. He did this before the king's -second solemn inauguration. Even the porters had been done away with, -so that the Temple could at any time be polluted by the presence of -the unclean, and the whole service of priests and Levites had fallen -into desuetude. - -Then he took the captains, and the Carians, and the princes, and -conducted the boy-king, amid throngs of his shouting and rejoicing -people, from the Temple to his own palace. There he seated him on the -lion-throne of Solomon his father, in the great hall of justice, and -the city was quiet and the land had rest. According to the historian, -"Joash did right _all his days_, because Jehoiada the priest -instructed him."[257] The stock addition that "howbeit the _bamoth_ -were not removed, and the people still sacrificed and offered incense -there," is no derogation from the merits of Joash, and perhaps not -even of Jehoiada, since if the law against the _bamoth_ then existed, -it had become absolutely unknown, and these local sanctuaries were -held to be conducive to true religion.[258] - -It was natural that the child of the Temple should have at heart the -interests of the Temple in which he had spent his early days, and to -the shelter of which he owed his life and throne. The sacred house had -been insulted and plundered by persons whom the Chronicler calls "the -sons of Athaliah, that wicked woman,"[259] meaning, probably, her -adherents. Not only had its treasures been robbed to enrich the house -of Baal, but it had been suffered to fall into complete disrepair. -Breaches gaped in the outer walls, and the very foundations were -insecure. The necessity for restoring it occurred, not, as we should -have expected, to the priests who lived at its altar, but to the -boy-king. He issued an order to the priests that they should take -charge of all the money presented to the Temple for the hallowed -things, all the money paid in current coin, and all the assessments -for various fines and vows,[260] together with every freewill -contribution. They were to have this revenue entirely at their -disposal, and to make themselves responsible for the necessary -repairs. According to the Chronicler, they were further to raise a -subscription throughout the country from all their personal friends. - -The king's command had been urgent. Money had at first come in, but -nothing was done. Joash had reached the twenty-third year of his -reign, and was thirty years old; but the Temple remained in its old -sordid condition. The matter is passed over by the king as lightly, -courteously, and considerately as he could; but if he does not charge -the priests with downright embezzlement, he does reproach them for -most reprehensible neglect. They were the appointed guardians of the -house: why did they suffer its dilapidations to remain untouched year -after year, while they continued to receive the golden stream which -poured--but now, owing to the disgust of the people, in diminished -volume--into their coffers? "Take no more money, therefore," he said, -"from your acquaintances, but deliver it for the breaches of the -house." For what they had already received he does not call them to -account, but henceforth takes the whole matter into his own hands. The -neglectful priests were to receive no more contributions, and not to -be responsible for the repairs. Joash, however, ordered Jehoiada to -take a chest and put it beside the altar on the right.[261] All -contributions were to be dropped into this chest. When it was full, it -was carried by the Levites unopened into the palace,[262] and there -the king's chancellor and the high priest had the ingots weighed and -the money counted; its value was added up, and it was handed over -immediately to the architects, who paid it to the carpenters and -masons. The priests were left in possession of the money for the -guilt-offerings[263] and for the sin-offerings, but with the rest of -the funds they had nothing to do. In this way was restored the -confidence which the management of the hierarchy had evidently -forfeited, and with renewed confidence in the administration fresh -gifts poured in. Even in the cautious narrative of the Chronicler it -is clear that the priests hardly came out of these transactions with -flying colours. If their honesty is not formally impugned, at least -their torpor is obvious, as is the fact that they had wholly failed to -inspire the zeal of the people till the young king took the affair -into his own hands.[264] - -The long reign of Joash ended in eclipse and murder. If the later -tradition be correct, it was also darkened with atrocious ingratitude -and crime. - -For, according to the Chronicler, Jehoiada died at the advanced age of -one hundred and thirty, and was buried, as an unwonted honour, in the -sepulchres of the kings.[265] When he was dead, the princes of Judah -came to Joash, who had now been king for many years, and with a -strange suddenness tempted the zealous repairer of the Temple of -Jehovah into idolatrous apostasy. With soft speech they seduced him -into the worship of Asherim. It was marvellous indeed if the child of -the Temple became its foe, and he who had made a covenant with Jehovah -fell away to Baalim. But worse followed. Prophets reproved him, and he -paid them no heed, in spite of "the greatness of the burdens"--_i.e._, -the multitude of the menaces--laid upon him.[266] The stern, -denunciative harangues were despised. At last Zechariah, the son of -his benefactor Jehoiada, rebuked king and people. He cried aloud from -some eminence in the court of the Temple, that "since they had -transgressed the commandments of Jehovah they could not prosper: they -had forsaken Him, and He would forsake them." Infuriated by this -prophecy of woe, the guilty people, at the command of their guiltier -king, stoned him to death.[267] As he lay dying, he exclaimed, "The -Lord look upon it, and require it!"[268] - -The entire silence of the elder and better authority might lead us to -hope that there may be room for doubt as to the accuracy of the much -later tradition. Yet there certainly was a persistent belief that -Zechariah had been thus martyred. A wild legend, related in the -Talmud,[269] tells us that when Nebuzaradan conquered Jerusalem and -entered the Temple he saw blood bubbling up from the floor of the -court, and slaughtered ninety-four myriads, so that the blood flowed -till it touched the blood of Zechariah, that it might be fulfilled -which is said (Hos. iv. 2), "Blood toucheth blood." When he saw the -blood of Zechariah, and noticed that it was boiling and agitated, he -asked, "What is this?" and was told that it was the spilled blood of -the sacrifices. Finding this to be false, he threatened to comb the -flesh of the priests with iron curry-combs if they did not tell the -truth. Then they confessed that it was the blood of the murdered -Zechariah. "Well," he said, "I will pacify him." First he slaughtered -the greater and lesser Sanhedrin: but the blood did not rest. Then he -sacrificed young men and maidens: but the blood still bubbled. At -last he cried, "Zechariah, Zechariah, must I then slay them all?" Then -the blood was still, and Nebuzaradan, thinking how much blood he had -shed, fled, repented, and became a Jewish proselyte! - -Perhaps the worst feature of the story against Joash might have been -susceptible of a less shocking colouring. He had naturally all his life -been under the influence of priestly domination. The ascendency which -Jehoiada had acquired as priest-regent had been maintained till long -after the young king had arrived at full manhood. At last, however, he -had come into collision with the priestly body. He was in the right; -they were transparently in the wrong. The Chronicler, and even the older -historian, soften the story against the priests as much as they can; but -in both their narratives it is plain that Jehoiada and the whole -hierarchy had been more careful of their own interests than of those of -the Temple, of which they were the appointed guardians. Even if they can -be acquitted of potential malfeasance, they had been guilty of -reprehensible carelessness. It is clear that in this matter they did not -command the confidence of the people; for so long as they had the -management of affairs the sources of munificence were either dried up or -only flowed in scanty streams, whereas they were poured forth with glad -abundance when the administration of the funds was placed mainly in the -hands of laymen under the king's chancellor. It is probable that when -Jehoiada was dead Joash thought it right to assert his royal authority -in greater independence of the priestly party; and that party was headed -by Zechariah, the son of Jehoiada. The Chronicler says that he -prophesied: that, however, would not necessarily constitute him a -prophet, any more than it constituted Caiaphas. If he was a prophet, and -was yet at the head of the priests, he furnishes an all-but solitary -instance of such a position. The position of a prophet, occupied in the -great work of moral reformation, was so essentially antithetic to that -of priests, absorbed in ritual ceremonies, that there is no body of men -in Scripture of whom, as a whole, we have a more pitiful record than of -the Jewish priests. From Aaron, who made the golden calf, to Urijah, who -sanctioned the idolatrous altar of Ahaz, and so down to Annas and -Caiaphas, who crucified the Lord of glory, they rendered few signal -services to true religion. They opposed Uzziah when he invaded their -functions, but they acquiesced in all the idolatries and abominations of -Rehoboam, Abijah, Ahaziah, Ahaz, and many other kings, without a -syllable of recorded protest. When a prophet did spring from their -ranks, they set their faces with one consent, and were confederate -against him. They mocked and ridiculed Isaiah. When Jeremiah rose among -them, the priest Pashur smote him on the cheek, and the whole body -persecuted him to death, leaving him to be protected only by the pity of -eunuchs and courtiers. Ezekiel was the priestliest of the prophets, and -yet he was forced to denounce the apostasies which they permitted in the -very Temple. The pages of the prophets ring with denunciations of their -priestly contemporaries.[270] - -We do not know enough of Zechariah to say much about his character; -but priests in every age have shown themselves the most unscrupulous -and the most implacable of enemies. Joash probably stood to him in -the same relation that Henry II. stood to Thomas Becket. The -priest's murder may have been due to an outburst of passion on the -part of the king's friends, or of the king himself--gentle as his -character seems to have been--without being the act of black -ingratitude which late traditions represented it to be. The legend -about Zechariah's blood represents the priest's spirit as so -ruthlessly unforgiving as to awaken the astonishment and even the -rebukes of the Babylonian idolater. Such a legend could hardly have -arisen in the case of a man who was other than a most formidable -opponent. The murder of Joash may have been, in its turn, a final -outcome of the revenge of the priestly party. The details of the story -must be left to inference and conjecture, especially as they are not -even mentioned in the earlier and more impartial annalists. - -It is at least singular that while Joash, the king, is blamed for -continuing the worship at the _bamoth_, Jehoiada, the high priest, is -_not_ blamed, though they continued throughout his long and powerful -regency. Further, we have an instance of the priest-regent's autocracy -which can hardly be regarded as redounding to his credit. It is -preserved in an accidental allusion on the page of Jeremiah. In Jer. -xxix. 26 we read his reproof and doom of the lying prophecy of the -priest Shemaiah the Nehelamite, because as a priest he had sent a -letter to the chief priest Zephaniah and all the priests, urging them -as the successors of Jehoiada to follow the ruling of Jehoiada, which -was to put Jeremiah in a collar. For Jehoiada, he said, "had ordered -the priests, as officers [_pakidim_] in the house of Jehovah, to put -in the stocks every one that is mad and maketh himself a -prophet."[271] If, then, the Jehoiada referred to is the -priest-regent, as seems undoubtedly to be the case, we see that he -hated all interference of Jehovah's prophets with his rule. That the -prophets were usually regarded by the world and by priests as "mad," -we see from the fact that the title is given by Jehu's captains to -Elisha's emissary;[272] and that this continued to be the case we see -from the fact that the priests and Pharisees of Jerusalem said of John -the Baptist that he had a devil, and of Christ that He was a -Samaritan, and that He, too, had a devil. If Joash was in opposition -to the priestly party, he was in the same position as all God's -greatest saints and reformers have ever been from the days of Moses to -the days of John Wesley. The dominance of priestcraft is the -invariable and inevitable death of true, as apart from functional, -religion. Priests are always apt to concentrate their attention upon -their temples, altars, religious practices and rites--in a word, upon -the externals of religion. If they gain a complete ascendency over -their fellow-believers, the faithful become their absolute slaves, -religion degenerates into formalism, "and the life of the soul is -choked by the observance of the ceremonial law." It was a misfortune -for the Chosen People that, except among the prophets and the wise -men, the external worship was thought much more of than the moral law. -"To the ordinary man," says Wellhausen, "it was not moral but -liturgical acts which seemed to be religious." This accounts for the -monotonous iteration of judgments on the character of kings, based -primarily, not upon their essential character, but on their relation -to the _bamoth_ and the calves. - -Although the historian of the Kings gives no hint of this dark story of -Zechariah's murder, or of the apostasy of Joash, and indeed narrates no -other event of the long reign of forty years, he tells us of the -deplorable close. Hazael's ambition had been fatal to Israel; and now, -in the cessation of Assyrian inroads upon Aram, he extended his arms -towards Judah. He went up against Gath and took it, and cherished -designs against Jerusalem. Apparently he did not head the expedition in -person, and the historian implies that Joash bought off the attack of -his "general." But the Chronicler makes things far worse. He says that -the Syrian host marched to Jerusalem, destroyed all the princes of the -people, plundered the city, and sent the spoil to Hazael, who was at -Damascus. Judah, he says, had assembled a vast army to resist the small -force of the Syrian raid; but Joash was ignominiously defeated, and was -driven to pay blackmail to the invader. As to this defeat in battle the -historian is silent; but he mentions what the Chronicler omits--namely, -that the only way in which Joash could raise the requisite bribe was by -once more stripping the Temple and the palace, and sending to Damascus -all the treasures which his three predecessors had consecrated,--though -we are surprised to learn that after so many strippings and plunderings -any of them could still be left. - -The anguish and mortification of mind caused by these disasters, and -perhaps the wounds he had received in the defeat of his army, threw -Joash into "great diseases." But he was not suffered to die of -these.[273] His servants--perhaps, if that story be authentic, to -avenge the slain son of Jehoiada, but doubtless also in disgust at -the national humiliation--rose in conspiracy against him, and smote -him at Beth-Millo,[274] where he was lying sick. The Septuagint, in 2 -Chron. xxiv. 27, adds the dark fact that _all his sons_ joined in the -conspiracy.[275] This cannot be true of Amaziah, who put the murderer -to death. Such, however, was the deplorable end of the king who had -stood by the Temple pillar in his fair childhood, amid the shouts and -trumpet-blasts of a rejoicing people. At that time all things seemed -full of promise and of hope. Who could have anticipated that the boy -whose head had been touched with the sacred oil and over-shadowed with -the Testimony--the young king who had made a covenant with Jehovah, -and had initiated the task of restoring the ruined Temple to its -pristine beauty--would end his reign in earthquake and eclipse? If -indeed he had been guilty of the black ingratitude and murderous -apostasy which tradition laid to his charge, we see in his end the -Nemesis of his ill-doing; yet we cannot but pity one who, after so -long a reign, perished amid the spoliation of his people, and was not -even allowed to end his days by the sore sickness into which he had -fallen, but was hurried into the next world by the assassin's knife. - -It is impossible not to hope that his deeds were less black than the -Chronicler painted. He had made the priests feel his power and -resentment, and their Levitic recorder was not likely to take a -lenient view of his offences. He says that though Joash was buried in -the City of David, he was not buried in the sepulchres of his fathers. -The historian of the Kings, however, expressly says that "they buried -him with his fathers in the City of David," and he was peaceably -succeeded by Amaziah his son. - -There is a curious, though it may be an accidental, circumstance about -the name of the two conspirators who slew him. They are called -"Jozacar, the son of Shimeath, and Jehozabad, the son of Shomer, his -servants." The names mean "Jehovah remembers," the son of "Hearer," -and "Jehovah awards," the son of "Watcher"; and this strangely recalls -the last words attributed in the Book of Chronicles to the martyred -Zechariah. "Jehovah look upon it, and require it!" The Chronicler -turns the names into "Zabad, the son of Shimeath, an Ammonitess, and -Jehozabad, the son of Shimrith, a Moabitess." Does he record this to -account for their murderous deed by the blood of hated nations which -ran in their veins? - -FOOTNOTES: - -[233] 2 Chron. xxi. 2-4. - -[234] 2 Chron. xxi. 17. - -[235] [Greek: homopatrios adelph] (Jos.). - -[236] 2 Chron. xxii. 11. There are undoubted difficulties about the -statement (see _infra_). There is no other instance of the marriage of -a princess with a priest. - -[237] Jos., _Antt._, IX. vii. 1: [Greek: to tamieion tn klinn]. The -chamber of beds was a sort of unoccupied wardrobe-room. - -[238] 2 Kings xi. 4: "The centurions of the Carians and of the runners." - -[239] This is the second time that the word "Sabbath" occurs, or that -the institution is alluded to, in the history of either monarchy. - -[240] Nothing is known of [Hebrew: sur], Sur, or [Hebrew: yesod] -_y'sd_, the Foundation (2 Chron. xxiii. 5). They are not mentioned -elsewhere. LXX., [Greek: en t pul tn hodn], and (in Chronicles) -[Greek: en t pyl t mes]. - -[241] Not as in A.V., "that it be not broken down." - -[242] In reading side by side the narratives in the Books of Kings and -Chronicles (2 Chron. xxiii.), it is difficult to avoid the conclusion -that the main anxiety of the Chronicler is to leave the impression -that the work in the Temple was chiefly done by the Levites, and that -the sacred precincts were not polluted by the presence of alien -troops. He evidently stumbled at the notion, conveyed by the older -narrative, that Carians and suchlike semi-heathen mercenaries should -have stood by the altar at a high priest's command; so he substitutes -Levites for guardsmen, and the profane laymen are relegated outside. -In details the two accounts are only reconcilable by a special -pleading which would reconcile _any_ discrepancy. - -[243] 1 Kings vii. 21. Comp., however, 2 Kings xxiii. 3. - -[244] See Exod. xxv. 16, 21, xvi. 34. [Hebrew: hatzedut] (see 2 Chron. -xxiii. 11). Kimchi takes it to mean "a royal robe," and other Rabbis a -phylactery on the coronet (Deut. vi. 8). In the Targum to Chronicles -it is explained to mean the costly jewel (2 Sam. xii. 30), of which -none but a descendant of David could bear the weight. For _ha'edth_ -Klostermann therefore suggests _hats'adth_, "the royal bracelets." - -[245] So says Josephus ([Greek: meta ts idias stratias]), and it is -certain that she would hardly go unattended. - -[246] Jos., _Antt._, IX. vii. 3: [Greek: Tous de hepomenous hoplitas -eirxan eiselthein]. - -[247] The meaning of _al-ha'amd_ is uncertain (A.V., "by a pillar"; -Vulg., "on the tribunal"). Comp. 2 Kings xxiii. 3; 2 Chron. xxiii. 13; -1 Kings viii. 22; 2 Chron. vi. 13. - -[248] 2 Kings xi. 15. Not as in A.V., "without the ranges." Heb., -_lash'drth_; LXX., [Greek: esthen tn sadrth]. - -[249] A.V., "And they laid hands on her"; LXX., [Greek: epebalon aut -cheiras]; Vulg., _imposuerunt ci manus_. But R.V. as in the text, -following the Targum, and the Jewish commentators, "They made for her -two sides." - -[250] This is usually understood to be the "horse gate" of the city -(Neh. iii. 28), and so Josephus seems to have taken it, for he says -that Athaliah was killed in "the Kedron Valley." Canon Rawlinson says -that it was more probably in the Tyropoeon Valley. But there could -have been no object in dragging the wretched queen all this way. -Jehoiada was only anxious that she should not stain the Temple with -her blood, and "the way by which the horses came into the king's -house" seems to be some private palace-gate. We are expressly told -(ver. 16) that Athaliah was slain "at the king's house," probably in -"the king's garden" (2 Kings xxv. 4). - -[251] Wellhausen, _Isr. and Jud._, p. 96. - -[252] 2 Chron. xv. 9-15. - -[253] 2 Chron. xxix. 10. - -[254] 2 Chron. xxxiv. 31. - -[255] The name is perhaps an abbreviation from Mattan-Baal, "gift of -Baal." Comp. "Methumballes" (Plaut.). The names of Tyrian kings, -Mitinna, Mattun, occur in inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser II. See -Herod., vii. 98 (Bahr, _ad loc._). "Methumbaal of Arvad" is mentioned -on a monument of Tiglath-Pileser II. (Schrader, ii. 249). - -[256] 2 Kings xii. 10; Jer. xxix. 26; 2 Chron. xxiv. 6. Stanley, -_Lectures_, ii. 399. - -[257] 2 Kings xii. 2. After "all his days," the R.V. and A.V. add -"_wherein_ Jehoiada instructed him." This, however, is not accurate. -There is a stop at days, and "wherein" should be "_because_." There -seems, however, from the LXX., to be some variation in the text, and -according to the Chronicler Joash became an apostate. LXX., [Greek: -Pasas tas hmeras has ephtizen auton ho hiereus]; Vulg., _Cunctis -diebus quibus docuit eum Jojadas sacerdos_. - -[258] The Chronicler (2 Chron. xxiv. 1, 2) _more suo_ copies 2 Kings -xii. 1, 2, but omits 3, because he dislikes the fact that not even his -hero Jehoiada had anything to say against the _bamoth_. But it appears -from 2 Kings xxiii. 9 that the _bamoth_ had regular priests of their -own, who "eat the priestly portions" (according to an old MS.) among -their brethren. - -[259] 2 Chron. xxiv. 7. - -[260] 2 Kings xii. 4: "The money that every man is set at." Lit., -"Each the money of the souls of his valuation." Comp. Numb. xviii. 16; -Lev. xxvii. 2. - -[261] The Chronicler says "at the gate." - -[262] 2 Chron. xxiv. 11. - -[263] Lev. v. 1-6, xiv. 13. "Trespass-money" is here first mentioned. - -[264] 2 Chron. xxiv. 8-10. There is a difference between the historian -and the Chronicler respecting the vessels of the house. - -[265] 2 Chron. xxiv. 15, 16. The statement of the Chronicler is (as so -often) surrounded by difficulties and improbabilities. If Jehoiada was -one hundred and thirty years old when he died, he must have been -ninety when Ahaziah was murdered, at the age of twenty-three. But as -Ahaziah was (apparently) born when his father Jehoram was eighteen, -Jehosheba must have been under eighteen, and must have been married to -a man seventy years older than herself! See Lord Arthur Hervey, _On -the Genealogies_, p. 113. - -[266] 2 Chron. xxiv. 27. - -[267] Stanley charitably thinks that Joash may have only burst into -hasty words like those of Henry II. against Becket. - -[268] The Chronicler says that "the _sons_ of Jehoiada" had helped to -crown him, and that he put "the _sons_ of Jehoiada" to death (2 Chron. -xxiii. 11, xxiv. 25). - -[269] Gittin, f. 57, 2; Sanhedrin, f. 96, 2; Hershon, _Treasures of -the Talmud_, p. 276; Lightfoot on Matt. xxiii. 35. There can be little -doubt that the reading "Berechiah" is a later correction of some one -who remembered the murder narrated in Jos., _B. J._, IV. v. 4, and -that the true reading is "son of Jehoiada." This is the last murder of -a prophet mentioned in the Old Testament, and we learn from the Gospel -the fact that he was slain "between the Temple and the altar." - -[270] Isa. xxiv. 2; Jer. v. 31, xxiii. 11; Ezek. vii. 26, xxii. 26; -Hos. iv. 9; Mic. iii. 11, etc. - -[271] Jer. xxix. 24-32. - -[272] 2 Kings ix. 11. - -[273] But from the Book of Kings we should not infer that there had been -any fighting at all. The Syrian commander had been bribed to retire. - -[274] We cannot understand the addition "on the way that goeth down to -Silla." Silla is nowhere else referred to. - -[275] LXX., 2 Chron. xxiv. 27, [Greek: kai hoi hyioi autou pantes]. - - - - - CHAPTER XV - - _AMAZIAH OF JUDAH_ - - B.C. 796-783 (?) - - 2 KINGS xiv. 1-22 - - "All they that take the sword shall perish with the sword."--MATT. - xxvi. 52. - - -The fate of Amaziah ("Jehovah is strong"), son of Joash of Judah, -resembles in some respects that of his father. Both began to reign -prosperously: the happiness of both ended in disaster. Amaziah at his -accession was twenty-five years old. He was the son of a lady of -Jerusalem named Jehoaddin. He reigned twenty-nine years, of which the -later ones were passed in misery, peril, and degradation, and, like -the unhappy Joash, and at about the same age, he fell the victim of -domestic conspiracy. - -The hereditary principle was too strongly established to enable the -murderers of Joash to set it aside, but Amaziah was not at first -strong enough to make any head against them. In time he became -established in his kingdom, and then his earliest act was to bring the -head conspirators, Jozacar and Jehozabad, to justice. It was noted as -a most remarkable circumstance that he did not put to death their -children, and extirpate their houses. In acting thus, if he were -influenced by a spirit of mercy, he showed himself before his time; -but such mercy was completely contrary to the universal custom, and -was also regarded as most impolitic. Even the comparatively merciful -Greeks had the proverb, "Fool, who has murdered the sire, and left his -sons to avenge him!"[276] - -In epochs of the wild justice of revenge, when blood-feuds are an -established and approved institution, the policy of letting vengeance -only fall on the actual offender was regarded as fatal. Perhaps Amaziah -felt it beyond his power to do more than bring the actual murderers to -justice, and it is possible that their children may have been among the -conspirators who, in his hour of shame, intimately destroyed him. - -The historian, it is true, attributes his conduct to magnanimity, or -rather to his obedience to the law, "The fathers shall not be put to -death for the children, nor the children for the fathers; but every -man shall die for his own sin." This is a reference to Deut. xxiv. 16, -and is probably the independent comment of the writer who recorded the -event two centuries later. In the gradual growth of a milder -civilisation, and the more common dominance of legal justice, such a -law may have come into force, as expressive of that voice of -conscience which is to sincere nations the voice of God. That the book -of Deuteronomy, as a book, was not in existence in its present form -till four reigns later we shall hereafter see strong reasons to -believe. But even if any part of that book was in existence, it is not -easy to understand how Amaziah would have been able to decide that the -law which forbade the punishment of the children with the offending -parents was the law which he was bound to follow, when Moses and -Joshua and other heroes of his race had acted on the olden principle. -The innocent families of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram were represented as -having been swallowed up with the ambitious heads of their houses. -Joshua and all Israel had not only stoned Achan, but with him all his -unoffending house. What, too, was the meaning of the law which -established the five Cities of Refuge as the best way to protect the -accidental homicide from the recognised and unrebuked actions of the -Goel--the avenger of blood? The vengeance of a Goel was regarded, as -it is in the East and South to this day, not as an implacable -fierceness, but as a sacred duty, the neglect of which would cover him -with infamy. Judging of our documents by the impartial light of honest -criticism, it seems impossible to deny that the law of Deuteronomy was -the law of an advancing civilisation, which became more mild as -justice became firmer and more available. If Deuteronomy represents -the legislation of Moses, we can only say that in this respect Amaziah -was the first person who paid the slightest attention to it. Such -exceptional obedience may well excite the notice of the historian, in -whose pages we see that prophets like Ahijah, Elijah, and Elisha had, -again and again, in accordance with the spirit of their times, -contemplated the total excision, not only of erring kings, but even of -their little children and their most distant kinsfolk. - -Further:--We are told that Amaziah "did that which was right in the -sight of Jehovah: he did according to all things _as Joash his father -did_." The Chronicler also bestows his eulogy on Amaziah; but having -told such dark stories of the apostasy of Joash to Asherah-worship -and his murder of the prophets, he could hardly add "as Joash his -father did"; so he omits those words. The reservation that Amaziah did -right, "yet not like David his father" (2 Kings xiv. 3), "but not with -a perfect heart" (2 Chron. xxv. 2), is followed by the stock abatement -about the _bamoth_, and the sacrifices and incense burnt in them. This -was a crime in the eyes of writers in B.C. 540, but certainly not in -the eyes of any king before the discovery of the "Book of the Law" in -the reign of Josiah, B.C. 621. We are compelled, therefore, by simple -truth, to ask, How came it that Amaziah should be so scrupulous as to -observe the Deuteronomic law by not slaying the sons of his father's -murderers, while he does not seem to be aware, any more than the best -of his predecessors, that while he obeyed one precept he was violating -the essence and spirit of the entire code in which the precept occurs? -The one main object, the constantly repeated law of Deuteronomy, is -the centralisation of all worship, and the rigid prohibition of every -local place of sacrifice. Strange that Amaziah should have selected -for attention a single precept, while he is profoundly unconscious of, -or indifferent to, the fact that he is setting aside the regulation -with which the law, as Deuteronomy represents it, begins and ends, and -on which it incessantly insists! - -Joash had been something of a weakling, as though the gloom of his -early concealment in the Temple and the shadow of priestly dominance -had paralysed his independence. Amaziah, on the other hand, born in -the purple, was vigorous and restless. When he was secure upon the -throne, and had done his duty to his father's memory, he bent his -efforts to recover Edom. The Edomites had revolted in the days of his -great-grandfather Jehoram,[277] and since then "did tear -perpetually,"[278] harassing with incessant raids the miserable -fellahn of Southern Judah. They reaped the crops of the settled -inhabitants, cut down their fruit-trees, burnt their farmsteads, and -carried their children into cruel and hopeless slavery. One verse -tells us all that the historian knew, or cared to relate, of Amaziah's -campaign. He only says that it was eminently successful. Amaziah -confronted the Edomites in the Valley of Salt,[279] on the border of -Edom, to the south of the Dead Sea, and inflicted upon them a signal -defeat. He not only slaughtered ten thousand of them, but, advancing -southwards, he stormed and captured Selah or Petra, their rocky -capital, two days' journey north of Ezion-Geber, on the gulf of -Akabah.[280] Considering the natural strength of Petra, amid its -mountain-fastnesses, this was a victory of which he might well be -proud, and he marked his prowess by changing the name of the city to -Joktheel, "subdued by God." The historian, copying the ancient record -before him, says that Selah continued to be so called "to this -day."[281] This is a curious instance of close transcription, for it -is certain that Selah can only have retained the name of Joktheel for -a very short period, and had lost it long before the days of the -Exile. Even in the reign of Ahaz (B.C. 735-715) the Edomites had so -completely recovered lost ground that they were able to make -predatory excursions into Judah, and to threaten Hebron, which would -have been obviously impossible if they were not masters of their own -chief capital.[282] The district which Amaziah seems to have conquered -was mainly west of the Arabah. He wished to restore Elath, and perhaps -to carry out the old commerce with the Red Sea which Solomon began, -and which had fired the ambition of Jehoshaphat. The conquest of Selah -secured the road for his commercial caravans. - -So far the older and better authorities. The Chronicler expands the -story in his usual fashion, in which historical and critical verity is -so often compelled, if not to suspect the disease of exaggeration and -the bias of Levitism, at least to feel uncertainty as to the details. -He says that Amaziah collected an army of three hundred thousand men -of Judah, trained them to a high state of discipline, and armed them -with spear and shield. He hired in addition one hundred thousand -Israelitish mercenaries, mighty men of valour, at the heavy cost of -one hundred talents of silver. He was rebuked by a prophet for -employing Israelites, "because the Lord was not with them," so that if -he used their aid he would certainly be defeated. Amaziah asked what -he was to do for the hundred talents, and the prophet told him that -Jehovah could give him much more than this.[283] So he dismissed his -Ephraimites who, returning home in great fury, "fell upon the cities -of Judah," from Samaria even unto Beth-horon, killed three thousand of -their inhabitants, and took much spoil. Amaziah, however, defeated the -Edomites without their aid, and not only slew ten thousand, but took -captive ten thousand more, all of whom he dashed to pieces by hurling -them from the top of the rock of Petra.[284] - -Then, by an apostasy much more astounding than even that of his father -Joash, he took home with him the idols of Mount Seir, worshipped them, -and burnt incense before them. Jehovah sends a prophet to rebuke him -for his senseless infatuation in worshipping the gods of the Edomites -whom he had just so utterly defeated; but Amaziah returns him the -insolent answer, "Who made thee of the king's council? Be silent, or I -will put thee to death." The prophet met his ironical sneer with words -of deeper meaning: "If I am not on _your_ council, I am on God's. -Because thou hast not hearkened to my counsel, I know that God has -counselled to destroy thee." - -The later writer thus accounts for the folly and overthrow of this -valorous and hitherto eminently pious king. Certain it is, as we shall -narrate in the next chapter, that, in spite of warning, he had the -temerity to challenge to battle the warlike Joash ben-Jehoahaz of -Israel, grandson of Jehu. The kings met at Beth-Shemesh, and Amaziah -was utterly routed, with consequences so shameful to himself and to -Jerusalem that he was never able to hold up his head again. He could -but eat away his own heart in despair, a ruined man. After this he -"lived" rather than reigned fifteen years longer.[285] The wall of -Jerusalem, broken down near the Damascus Gate, on the side towards -Israel, for a space of four hundred cubits, was a standing witness of -the king's infatuated folly. His people were ashamed of him, and weary -of him; and at last, seeing that nothing more could be expected of one -whose spirit had evidently been broken from impetuosity into -abjectness, they formed a conspiracy against him. To save his life he -fled to the strong fort of Lachish, a royal Canaanite city, in the -hills to the south-west of Judah.[286] But they pursued him thither, -and even Lachish would not protect him. He was murdered. They threw -the corpse upon a chariot, conveyed it to Jerusalem, and buried it in -the sepulchres of his fathers. The people quietly elevated to the -throne his son Azariah, then sixteen years old, who had been born the -year before his father's crowning disgrace. What became of the -conspirators we do not know. They were probably too strong to be -brought to justice, and we are not told that Azariah even attempted to -visit their crime upon their heads. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[276] [Greek: Npios hos patera kteinas hyious kataleipei]. Comp. Q. -Curtius, vi. 11: "Lege cautum erat ut propinqui eorum qui regi -insidiati cum ipsis necarentur." Cic., _Ad Brut._, 15. - -[277] 2 Kings viii. 20-22. - -[278] Amos i. 11. - -[279] The Valley (_G_) of Salt is "the plain of the Sabkah," about -two miles broad, between the southern end of the Dead Sea and the -hills which separate the Ghr from the Arabah (Seetzen, _Reisen_, ii. -356; Robinson, _Researches_, ii. 450, 488). David had won a great -victory there (2 Sam. viii. 13; Psalm lx., _title_). - -[280] Selah, "a rock" ([Greek: Petra]). Eusebius calls it Rekem. - -[281] It is the name also of a city of Judah (Josh. xv. 38). - -[282] 2 Chron. xxviii. 17; Jos., _Antt._, XII. viii. 6. - -[283] 2 Chron. xxv. 5-10, 13. - -[284] [Greek: Katakrmnismos]. This mode of execution prevailed till -quite recent times in the little republic of Andorra. - -[285] 2 Kings xiv. 17. The phrase that "he _lived_ fifteen years" is -unusual, and seems to imply that the historian saw,-- - - "In more of life true life no more." - - -[286] Josh. x. 6, 31, xv. 39; 2 Kings xviii. 17; 2 Chron. xi. 9. - - - - - CHAPTER XVI - - _THE DYNASTY OF JEHU_ - - B.C. - Jehoahaz 814-797 2 Kings xiii. 1-9 - Joash 797-781 " xiii. 10-21, xiv. 8-16 - Jeroboam II. 781-740 " xiv. 23-29 - Zechariah 740 " xv. 8-12 - - "Them that honour Me I will honour, and they that despise Me shall - be lightly esteemed."--1 SAM. ii. 30. - - -Israel had scarcely ever sunk to so low a nadir of degradation as she -did in the reign of the son of Jehu. We have already mentioned that -some assign to his reign the ghastly story which we have narrated in -our sketch of the work of Elisha. It is told in the sixth chapter of -the Second Book of Kings, and seems to belong to the reign of Jehoram -ben-Ahab; but it may have got displaced from this epoch of yet deeper -wretchedness. The accounts of Jehoahaz in 2 Kings xiii. are evidently -fragmentary and abrupt. - -Jehoahaz reigned seventeen years.[287] Naturally, he did not disturb -the calf-worship, which, like all his predecessors and successors, he -regarded as a perfectly innocent symbolic adoration of Jehovah, whose -name he bore and whose service he professed. Why should he do so? It -had been established now for more than two centuries. His father, in -spite of his passionate and ruthless zeal for Jehovah, had never -attempted to disturb it. No prophet--not even Elijah nor Elisha, the -practical establishers of his dynasty--had said one word to condemn -it. It in no way rested on his conscience as an offence; and the -formal condemnation of it by the historian only reflects the more -enlightened judgment of the Southern Kingdom and of a later age. But -according to the parenthesis which breaks the thread of this king's -story (2 Kings xiii. 5, 6), he was guilty of a far more culpable -defection from orthodox worship; for in his reign, the Asherah--the -tree or pillar of the Tyrian nature-goddess--still remained in -Samaria, and therefore must have had its worshippers. How it came -there we cannot tell. Jezebel had set it up (1 Kings xvi. 33), with -the connivance of Ahab. Jehu apparently had "put it away" with the -great stl of Baal (2 Kings iii. 2), but, for some reason or other, -he had not destroyed it. It now apparently occupied some public place, -a symbol of decadence, and provocative of the wrath of Heaven. - -Jehoahaz sank very low. Hazael's savage sword, not content with the -devastation of Bashan and Gilead, wasted the west of Israel also in -all its borders. The king became a mere vassal of his brutal neighbour -at Damascus. So little of the barest semblance of power was left him, -that whereas, in the reign of David, Israel could muster an army of -eight hundred thousand, and in the reign of Joash, the son and -successor of Jehoahaz, Amaziah could hire from Israel one hundred -thousand mighty men of valour as mercenaries, Jehoahaz was only -allowed to maintain an army of ten chariots, fifty horsemen, and ten -thousand infantry! In the picturesque phrase of the historian, "the -King of Syria had threshed down Israel to the dust," in spite of all -that Jehoahaz did, or tried to do, and "all his might." How completely -helpless the Israelites were is shown by the fact that their armies -could offer no opposition to the free passage of the Syrian troops -through their land. Hazael did not regard them as threatening his -rear; for, in the reign of Jehoahaz, he marched southwards, took the -Philistine city of Gath, and threatened Jerusalem. Joash of Judah -could only buy them off with the bribe of all his treasures, and -according to the Chronicler they "destroyed all the princes of the -people," and took great spoil to Damascus.[288] - -Where was Elisha? After the anointing of Jehu he vanishes from the -scene. Unless the narrative of the siege of Samaria has been displaced, -we do not so much as once hear of him for nearly half a century. - -The fearful depth of humiliation to which the king was reduced drove -him to repentance. Wearied to death of the Syrian oppression of which -he was the daily witness, and of the utter misery caused by prowling -bands of Ammonites and Moabites--jackals who waited on the Syrian -lion--Jehoahaz "besought the Lord,[289] and the Lord hearkened unto -him, and gave Israel a saviour, so that they went out from under the -hand of the Syrians: and the children of Israel dwelt in their tents, -as beforetime." If this indeed refers to events which come out of -place in the memoirs of Elisha; and if Jehoahaz ben-Jehu, not Jehoram -ben-Ahab, was the king in whose reign the siege of Samaria was so -marvellously raised, then Elisha may possibly be the temporary -deliverer who is here alluded to.[290] On this supposition we may see -a sign of the repentance of Jehoahaz in the shirt of sackcloth which -he wore under his robes, as it became visible to his starving people -when he rent his clothes on hearing the cannibal instincts which had -driven mothers to devour their own children. But the respite must have -been brief, since Hazael (ver. 22) oppressed Israel all the days of -Jehoahaz. If this rearrangement of events be untenable, we must -suppose that the repentance of Jehoahaz was only so far accepted, and -his prayer so far heard, that the deliverance, which did not come in -his own days, came in those of his son and of his grandson. - -Of him and of his wretched reign we hear no more; but a very different -epoch dawned with the accession of his son Joash, named after the -contemporary King of Judah, Joash ben-Ahaziah. - -In the Books of Kings and Chronicles Joash of Israel is condemned with -the usual refrains about the sins of Jeroboam. No other sin is laid to -his charge; and breaking the monotony of reprobation which tells us of -every king of Israel without exception that "he did that which was -evil in the sight of the Lord," Josephus boldly ventures to call him -"a good man, and the antithesis to his father." - -He reigned sixteen years. At the beginning of his reign he found his -country the despised prey, not only of Syria, but of the paltry -neighbouring bandit-sheykhs who infested the east of the Jordan; he -left it comparatively strong, prosperous, and independent. - -In his reign we hear again of Elisha, now a very old man of past eighty -years. Nearly half a century had elapsed since the grandfather of Joash -had destroyed the house of Ahab at the prophet's command. News came to -the king that Elisha was sick of a mortal sickness, and he naturally -went to visit the death-bed of one who had called his dynasty to the -throne, and had in earlier years played so memorable a part in the -history of his country. He found the old man dying, and he wept over -him, crying, "My father, my father! the chariot of Israel, and the -horsemen thereof."[291] The address strikes us with some surprise. -Elisha had indeed delivered Samaria more than once when the city had -been reduced to direst extremity; but in spite of his prayers and of his -presence, the sins of Israel and her kings had rendered this chariot of -Israel of very small avail. The names of Ahab, Jehu, Jehoahaz, call up -memories of a series of miseries and humiliations which had reduced -Israel to the very verge of extinction. For sixty-three years Elisha had -been the prophet of Israel; and though his public interpositions had -been signal on several occasions, they had not been availing to prevent -Ahab from becoming the vassal of Assyria, nor Israel from becoming the -appanage of the dominion of that Hazael whom Elisha himself had anointed -King of Syria, and who had become of all the enemies of his country the -most persistent and the most implacable. - -The narrative which follows is very singular. We must give it as it -occurs, with but little apprehension of its exact significance. - -Elisha, though Joash "did that which was evil in the sight of the -Lord," seems to have regarded him with affection. He bade the youth -take his bow,[292] and laid his feeble, trembling hands on the strong -hands of the king. Then he ordered an attendant to fling open the -lattice, and told the king to shoot eastward towards Gilead, the -region whence the bands of Syria made their way over the Jordan. The -king shot, and the fire came back into the old prophet's eye as he -heard the arrow whistle eastward. He cried, "The arrow of Jehovah's -deliverance, even the arrow of victory over Syria: for thou shalt -smite the Syrians in Aphek, till thou have consumed them."[293] Then -he bade the young king to take the sheaf of arrows, and smite towards -the ground, as if he was striking down an enemy. Not understanding the -significance of the act, the king made the sign of thrice striking the -arrows downwards, and then naturally stopped.[294] But Elisha was -angry--or at any rate grieved.[295] "You should have smitten five or -six times," he said, "and then you would have smitten Syria to -destruction. Now you shall only smite Syria thrice." The king's fault -seems to have been lack of energy and faith. - -There are in this story some peculiar elements which it is impossible -to explain, but it has one beautiful and striking feature. It tells -us of the death-bed of a prophet. Most of God's greatest prophets have -perished amid the hatred of priests and worldlings. The progress of -the truth they taught has been "from scaffold to scaffold, and from -stake to stake." - - "Careless seems the Great Avenger. History's pages but record - One death-grapple in the darkness 'twixt old systems and the - Word-- - Truth for ever on the scaffold, wrong for ever on the throne; - Yet that scaffold sways the Future, and behind the dim - unknown - Standeth God within the shadow, keeping watch above His own!" - -Now and then, however, as an exception, a great prophetic teacher or -reformer escapes the hatred of the priests and of the world, and dies in -peace. Savonarola is burnt, Huss is burnt, but Wiclif dies in his bed at -Lutterworth, and Luther died in peace at Eisleben. Elijah passed away in -storm, and was seen no more. A king comes to weep by the death-bed of -the aged Elisha. "For us," it has been said, "the scene at his bedside -contains a lesson of comfort and even encouragement. Let us try to -realise it. A man with no material power is dying in the capital of -Israel. He is not rich: he holds no office which gives him any immediate -control over the actions of men; he has but one weapon--the power of his -word. Yet Israel's king stands weeping at his bedside--weeping because -this inspired messenger of Jehovah is to be taken from him. In him both -king and people will lose a mighty support, for this man is a greater -strength to Israel than chariots and horsemen are. Joash does well to -mourn for him, for he has had courage to wake the nation's conscience; -the might of his personality has sufficed to turn them in the true -direction, and rouse their moral and religious life. Such men as Elisha -everywhere and always give a strength to their people above the strength -of armies, for the true blessings of a nation are reared on the -foundations of its moral force." - -The annals are here interrupted to introduce a posthumous -miracle--unlike any other in the whole Bible--wrought by the bones of -Elisha. He died, and they buried him, "giving him," as Josephus says, -"a magnificent burial." As usual, the spring brought with it the -marauding bands of Moabites. Some Israelites who were burying a man -caught sight of them, and, anxious to escape, thrust the man into the -sepulchre of Elisha, which happened to be nearest at hand. But when he -was placed in the rocky tomb, and touched the bones of Elisha, he -revived, and stood up on his feet. Doubtless the story rests on some -real circumstance. There is, however, something singular in the turn -of the original, which says (literally) that the man _went and -touched_ the bones of Elisha;[296] and there is proof that the story -was told in varying forms, for Josephus says that it was the Moabite -plunderers who had killed the man, and that he was thrown by them into -Elisha's tomb.[297] It is easy to invent moral and spiritual lessons -out of this incident, but not so easy to see what lesson is intended -by it. Certainly there is not throughout Scripture any other passage -which even _seems_ to sanction any suspicions of magic potency in the -relics of the dead.[298] - -But Elisha's symbolic prophecy of deliverance from Syria was amply -fulfilled. About this time Hazael had died, and had left his power in -the feebler hands of his son Benhadad III. Jehoahaz had not been able -to make any way against him (2 Kings xiii. 3), but Joash his son -thrice met and thrice defeated him at Aphek. As a consequence of these -victories, he won back all the cities which Hazael had taken from his -father on the west of Jordan. The east of Jordan was never recovered. -It fell under the shadow of Assyria, and was practically lost for ever -to the tribes of Israel. - -Whether Assyria lent her help to Joash under certain conditions we do -not know. Certain it is that from this time the terror of Syria -vanishes. The Assyrian king Rammnirri III. about this time -subjugated all Syria and its king, whom the tablets call Mari, perhaps -the same as Benhadad III. In the next reign Damascus itself fell into -the power of Jeroboam II., the son of Joash. - -One more event, to which we have already alluded, is narrated in the -reign of this prosperous and valiant king. - -Amity had reigned for a century between Judah and Israel, the result -of the politic-impolitic alliance which Jehoshaphat had sanctioned -between his son Jehoram and the daughter of Jezebel. It was obviously -most desirable that the two small kingdoms should be united as closely -as possible by an offensive and defensive alliance. But the bond -between them was broken by the overweening vanity of Amaziah ben-Joash -of Judah. His victory over the Edomites, and his conquest of Petra, -had puffed him up with the mistaken notion that he was a very great -man and an invincible warrior. He had the wicked infatuation to kindle -an unprovoked war against the Northern Tribes. It was the most wanton -of the many instances in which, if Ephraim did not envy Judah, at -least Judah vexed Ephraim, Amaziah challenged Joash to come out to -battle, that they might look one another in the face. He had not -recognised the difference between fighting with and without the -sanction of the God of battles. - -Joash had on his hands enough of necessary and internecine war to make -him more than indifferent to that bloody game. Moreover, as the superior -of Amaziah in every way, he saw through his inflated emptiness. He knew -that it was the worst possible policy for Judah and Israel to weaken -each other in fratricidal war, while Syria threatened their northern and -eastern frontiers, and while the tread of the mighty march of Assyria -was echoing ominously in the ears of the nations from afar. Better and -kinder feelings may have mingled with these wise convictions. He had no -wish to destroy the poor fool who so vaingloriously provoked his -superior might. His answer was one of the most crushingly contemptuous -pieces of irony which history records, and yet it was eminently kindly -and good-humoured. It was meant to save the King of Judah from advancing -any further on the path of certain ruin. - -"The thistle that was in Lebanon" (such was the apologue which he -addressed to his would-be rival) "sent to the cedar that was in -Lebanon, saying: Give thy daughter to my son to wife.[299] The cedar -took no sort of notice of the thistle's ludicrous presumption, but a -wild beast that was in Lebanon passed by, and trod down the thistle." - -It was the answer of a giant to a dwarf;[300] and to make it quite -clear to the humblest comprehension, Joash good-naturedly added: "You -are puffed up with your victory over Edom: glory in this, and stay at -home. Why by your vain meddling should you ruin yourself and Judah with -you? Keep quiet: I have something else to do than to attend to you." - -Happy had it been for Amaziah if he had taken warning! But vanity is a -bad counsellor, and folly and self-deception--ill-matched pair--were -whirling him to his doom. Seeing that he was bent on his own -perdition, Joash took the initiative and marched to Beth-Shemesh, in -the territory of Judah.[301] There the kings met, and there Amaziah -was hopelessly defeated. His troops fled to their scattered homes, and -he fell into the hands of his conqueror. Joash did not care to take -any sanguinary revenge; but much as he despised his enemy, he thought -it necessary to teach him and Judah the permanent lesson of not again -meddling to their own hurt. He took the captive king with him to -Jerusalem, which opened its gates without a blow.[302] We do not know -whether, like a Roman conqueror, he entered it through the breach of -four hundred cubits which he ordered them to make in the walls,[303] -but otherwise he contented himself with spoil which would swell his -treasure, and amply compensate for the expenses of the expedition -which had been forced upon him. He ransacked Jerusalem for silver and -gold; he made Obed-Edom, the treasurer, give up to him all the sacred -vessels of the Temple, and all that was worth taking from the palace. -He also took hostages--probably from among the number of the king's -sons--to secure immunity from further intrusions. It is the first time -in Scripture that hostages are mentioned. It is to his credit that he -shed no blood, and was even content to leave his defeated challenger -with the disgraced phantom of his kingly power, till, fifteen years -later, he followed his father to the grave through the red path of -murder at the hand of his own subjects.[304] - -After this we hear no further records of this vigorous and able king, -in whom the characteristics of his grandfather Jehu are reflected in -softer outline. He left his son Jeroboam II. to continue his career of -prosperity, and to advance Israel to a pitch of greatness which she -had never yet attained, in which she rivalled the grandeur of the -united kingdom in the earlier days of Solomon's dominion. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[287] I have not thought it worth while to unravel by a series of -uncertain conjectures the careless, and often self-contradictory, -synchronism of the reigns of the kings in the two kingdoms. The compiler -of these books evidently attached little or no importance to accurate -chronology. For instance, the data of 2 Kings xiii. 1, 10, do not -coincide; and instead of entering into tedious, doubtful, and confusing -guesses, I have contented myself throughout with giving for the reigns -of the kings such dates, or approximate dates, as seem to result from -the several notices compared with the contemporary annals of Assyria. - -[288] 2 Chron. xxiv. 23. - -[289] 2 Kings xiii. 4; "besought," literally "_stroked the face of_" -(1 Sam. xiii. 12; 1 Kings xiii. 6). - -[290] The reference is usually explained of Jeroboam II. - -[291] Comp. 2 Kings ii. 12. - -[292] Lit., "Make thine hand to ride upon thy bow." There is not the -slightest taint of belomancy in the story (comp. Ezek. xxi. 21), nor -does it allude to shooting an arrow into an enemy's country as a -declaration of war (Virg., _n._, ix. 57). - -[293] Aphek, a name of good omen (1 Kings xx. 26-30). - -[294] Thrice. Comp. Num. xxii. 28; Exod. xxiii. 17, etc. - -[295] LXX., [Greek: elypth]. - -[296] See R.V., margin. - -[297] _Antt._, IX. viii. 6. - -[298] See Ecclus. xlviii. 13: "When he was dead, he prophesied in the -tomb." (But the clause may be spurious.) - -[299] Possibly some matrimonial proposal may have lain behind the -interchange of messages. - -[300] Stade. For similar parables see Judg. ix. 8; Herod., i. 141; -Rawlinson, _Anc. Mon._, iii. 226. - -[301] Beth-Shemesh, "the house of the sun." It is mentioned in 1 Sam. -vi. 9, 12, and was a priestly city, and one of Solomon's store-cities -(1 Kings iv. 9). It ultimately fell into the hands of the Philistines -(2 Chron. xxviii. 18). It is not the Beth-Shemesh of Josh. xix. 22. - -[302] Josephus says that this was the fault of Amaziah, whom Joash of -Israel threatened with death if Jerusalem resisted. - -[303] This implies that at least half the northern wall was -dismantled--the wall towards Ephraim. - -[304] Some have conjectured that Amaziah of Judah became more or less -the vassal of Joash of Israel, and that the vassalage continued till -after the death of Jeroboam II. (1) For Jeroboam II. held Elath till -his death, when Uzziah recovered it (2 Kings xiv. 22), and he -certainly could not have held this southern Judan port if Judah was -entirely independent; and (2) we read that Uzziah did not become king -at all till the _twenty-seventh_ year of Jeroboam II. But if Amaziah -only survived Joash of Israel fifteen years (2 Kings xiv. 17), Uzziah -must have succeeded in the _fifteenth_ year of Jeroboam. Is the -explanation to be found in the fact that up to that time--for twelve -years--Jeroboam did not allow the Judans to elect a king? or are -these among the hopeless confusion of synchronism which cannot be -reconciled at all with our present data? - - - - - CHAPTER XVII - - _THE DYNASTY OF JEHU (continued)--JEROBOAM II_ - - B.C. 781-740 - - 2 KINGS xiv. 23-29 - - -If we had only the history of the kings to depend upon, we should -scarcely form an adequate conception either of the greatness of -Jeroboam II. or of the condition of society which prevailed in Israel -during his long and most prosperous reign of forty-one years (B.C. -781-740). In the Books of Chronicles he is merely mentioned -accidentally in a genealogy. The Second Book of Kings only devotes one -verse to him (xiv. 25) beyond the stock formul of connection so often -repeated. That verse, however, gives us at least a glimpse of his -great importance, for it tells us that "he restored the coast of -Israel from the entering of Hamath unto the sea of the plain." Those -two lines sufficiently prove to us that he was by far the greatest and -most powerful of all the kings of Israel, as he was also the -longest-lived and had the longest reign. His victories flung a broad -gleam of sunset over the afflicted kingdom, and, for a time, they -might have beguiled the Israelites into lofty hopes for the future; -but with the death of Jeroboam the light instantly faded away, and -there was no after-glow. - -And this sudden brightness, if it deceived others, did not deceive the -prophets of the Lord. It happened in accordance with the promise of -Jehovah given by Jonah, the son of Amittai, of Gath-Hepher;[305] but -Amos and Hosea saw that the glory of the reign was hollow and -delusive, and that the outward prosperity did but "skin and film the -ulcerous place" below. - -In truth, the possibility of this sudden outburst of success was due to -the very enemy who, within a few years, was to grind Israel to powder. -God pitied the deplorable overthrow of His chosen people: He saw that -there was neither slave nor freeman--"neither any shut up, nor any left -at large, nor any helper for Israel"; and in Jeroboam He gave them the -saviour who had been granted to the penitence of Jehoahaz.[306] It was, -so to speak, a last pledge to them of the love and mercy of Jehovah, -which gave them a respite, and would fain have saved them altogether, if -they had turned with their whole heart to Him. And, personally, Jeroboam -II. seems to have been one of the better kings. Not a single crime is -laid to his charge; for under the circumstances of its deep-rooted -continuance through the reigns of all his predecessors, it cannot be -deemed a heinous crime that he did not put down the symbolic cult of -Jehovah by the cherubic emblems at Dan and Bethel. The fact that he had -been named after the founder of the kingdom of Israel shows that the -kingdom was proud of the valiant and Heaven-commissioned rebel who had -thrown off the yoke of the house of Solomon. The house of Jehu admired -his policy and his institutions. The son of Nebat did not by any means -appear in the eyes of his people as only worthy of the monotonous -epitaph, "who made Israel to sin." It is true that now the voice of -prophecy in Israel itself began to denounce the concomitants of the -"calf-worship"; but the voices of the Jewish herdsman of Tekoa and of -the Israelite Hosea probably raised but faint murmurs in the ears of the -warrior-king, with whom they do not seem to have come into personal -contact. In no case would he rank them as equal in importance with the -fiery Elijah or the king-making Elisha, who had been for four -generations the counsellor of his race. Neither of those great prophets -had insisted on the Deuteronomic law of a centralised worship, nor had -they denounced the revered local sanctuaries with which Israel had been -so long familiar. Jonah, indeed--who, if legend be correct, had been the -boy of Zarephath, and the personal attendant of Elijah--had predicted -the king's unbroken success, and had neither made it conditional on a -religious revolution, nor, so far as we know, had in any way censured -the existing institutions. - -What rendered Jeroboam's glory possible was the immediate paralysis -and imminent ruin of the power of Syria. The Israelitish king was -probably on good terms with Assyria, and, during this epoch, three -Assyrian monarchs had struck blow after blow against the house of -Hazael. Damascus and its dependencies had received shattering defeats -at the hands of Rammnirri III., Shalmaneser III. (782-772), and -Assurdan III. (772-754). Rammnirri had made expeditions against -Damascus (773) and Hazael (772), and Assurdan had invaded the Syrian -domains in 767, 755, and 754. Syria had more than enough to do to hold -her own in a struggle for life and death against her atrocious -neighbour. With Uzziah in Judah, Jeroboam II. seems to have been on -the friendliest terms; and probably Uzziah acted as a half-independent -vassal, united with him by common interests. The day for Assyria to -threaten Israel had not yet come. Syria lay in the path; and Assurdan -III. had been succeeded by Assurnirari, who gave the world the unusual -spectacle of a peaceful Assyrian king. - -Jeroboam II., therefore, was free to enlarge his domains; and unless -there be a little patriotic exaggeration in the extent and reality of -his prowess, he exercised at least a nominal suzerainty over a realm -nearly as extensive as that of David. He first advanced against -Damascus, and so far "recovered" it as to make it acknowledge his -rule.[307] His father Joash had won back all the Israelite cities -which Benhadad III. had taken from Jehoahaz; and Jeroboam, if he did -not absolutely reconquer the district east of Jordan, yet kept it in -check and repressed the predatory incursions of the Emrs of Moab and -Ammon.[308] He thus extended the border of Israel to the sea of the -Arabah and "the brook of willows" which divides Edom from Moab.[309] -But this was not all. He pushed his conquests two hundred miles -northwards of Samaria, and became lord of Hamath the Great. Ascending -the gorge of the Litny between the chains of Libanus and Antilibanus, -which formed the northern limit of Israel, and following the river to -its source near Baalbek, he then descended the Valley of the Orontes, -which constitutes the "pass" or "entering in" of Hamath. Hamath was a -town of the Hittites, the most powerful race of ancient Canaan. They -were not of Semitic origin, but spoke a separate language. They were -the last great branch of the once famous and dominant Khetas, whose -former importance has only recently been revealed by their deciphered -inscriptions. A century and a half earlier the Hamathites had thrown -off the yoke of Solomon, and they governed nearly a hundred dependent -cities. In alliance with the Phoenicians and Syrians, they had been -valuable members of a league, which, though defeated, had long formed -a barrier against the southward movement of the Assyrians. How -striking was the conquest of this city by Jeroboam is shown by the -title of "Hamath the Great," bestowed upon it by the contemporary -prophets,[310] with whom literary prophecy begins. - -The result of these conquests was unwonted peace. Agriculture once -more became possible, when the farmers of Israel were secure that -their crops would not be reaped by plundering Bedoun. Intercourse -with neighbouring nations was revived, as in the golden days of -Solomon, though it was regarded with suspicion.[311] Civilisation -softened something of the old brutality. Prophecy assumed a different -type, and literature began to dawn. - -But to this state of things there was, as we learn from the -contemporary prophets Amos and Hosea, a darker side. Of Jonah we know -nothing more; for it is impossible to see in the Book of Jonah much -more than a beautiful and edifying story, which may or may not rest on -some surviving legends. It differs from every other prophetic book by -beginning with the word "And," and its late origin and legendary -character cannot any longer be reasonably disputed.[312] We may hope, -therefore, that the Northern prophet, whose home was not far from -Nazareth, was not quite the morose and ruthless grumbler so strikingly -portrayed in the book which bears his name. Of any historical -intervention of his in the affairs of Jeroboam we know nothing further -than the recorded promise of the king's prosperity. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[305] 2 Kings xiv. 25-27. There are other allusions to the historic -events in 2 Kings x. 32, 33, xiii. 3-7, 22-25. Hitzig conjectures that -Isa. xv., xvi., are "a burden of Moab" quoted from Jonah. - -[306] 2 Kings xiii. 5, "The Lord gave Israel a saviour"; xiv. 27, "And -He saved them by the hand of Jeroboam, the son of Joash." Some suppose -the saviour to be the Assyrian King. - -[307] It had owned the feudal supremacy of David (2 Sam. viii. 6), and -Ahab had extorted the privilege of having bazaars there (1 Kings xx. -34). Considering how immense had been the resources of Damascus (2 -Kings vi. 14), which had once been able to send to battle twelve -thousand war-chariots (_Eponym Canon_, p. 108) under Benhadad, we see -how fearfully the Syrian capital must have been weakened. - -[308] If Isa. xv. 1, 2, refers to this invasion of Jeroboam II., as -Hitzig first conjectured, we infer that he had taken both Ar of Moab -(Rabbath) and Kir of Moab, a strong fortress on a hill, by night -assaults; and that he had also captured Dibon, Nebo, and Medeba, and -inflicted on them summary chastisement. It appears that the Moabites -had advanced northwards from the Arnon, while Hazael occupied -Ramoth-Gilead, and had seized part of the tribe of Reuben. Jeroboam -II. first expelled them, and then invaded their own proper country. -Hitzig conjectures that Isa. xv., xvi., are really an old -prophecy--perhaps by Jonah, son of Amittai--which Isaiah quotes, and -to which he adds two verses (Isa. xvi. 12, 13). In such overthrow Moab -must have learnt to be ashamed of Chemosh (Jer. xlviii. 13). - -[309] Isa. xv. 7; Amos vi. 14. - -[310] Amos vi. 2. - -[311] Merchandise had hitherto been considered discreditable for a -pure Jew, so that a trader is called a Canaanite (Hos. xii. 7, 8). - -[312] See the writer's _Minor Prophets_ ("Men of the Bible" Series), -pp. 231-243. - - - - - CHAPTER XVIII - - _AMOS, HOSEA, AND THE KINGDOM OF ISRAEL_ - - 2 KINGS xiv. 23-29; xv. 8-12 - - "In them is plainest taught and easiest learnt - What makes a nation happy and keeps it so, - What ruins kingdoms and lays cities flat." - MILTON, _Paradise Regained_. - - "We see dimly in the Present what is small and what is great, - Slow of faith how weak an arm may turn the iron helm of Fate: - But the soul is still oracular: amid the market's din - List the ominous stern whisper from the Delphic cave within, - 'They enslave their children's children who make compromise with - sin.'" - LOWELL. - - -Amos and Hosea are the two earliest prophets whose "burdens" have come -down to us. From them we gain a near insight into the internal -condition of Israel in this day of her prosperity. - -We see, first, that the prosperity was not unbroken. Though peace -reigned, the people were not left to lapse unwarned into sloth and -godlessness. The land had suffered from the horrible scourge of locusts, -until every _carmel_--every garden of God on hill and plain--withered -before them.[313] There had been widespread conflagrations;[314] there -had been a visitation of pestilence; and, finally, there had been an -earthquake so violent that it constituted an epoch from which dates -were reckoned.[315] There were also two eclipses of the sun, which -darkened with fear the minds of the superstitious.[316] - -Nor was this the worst. Civilisation and commerce had brought luxury in -their train, and all the bonds of morality had been relaxed. The country -began to be comparatively depleted, and the innocent regularity of -agricultural pursuits palled upon the young, who were seduced by the -glittering excitement of the growing towns. All zeal for religion was -looked on as archaic, and the splendour of formal services was regarded -as a sufficient recognition of such gods as there were. As a natural -consequence, the nobles and the wealthy classes were more and more -infected with a gross materialism, which displayed itself in -ostentatious furniture, and sumptuous palaces of precious marbles inlaid -with ivory. The desire for such vanities increased the thirst for gold, -and avarice replenished its exhausted coffers by grinding the faces of -the poor, by defrauding the hireling of his wages, by selling the -righteous for silver, the needy for handfuls of barley, and the poor for -a pair of shoes. The degrading vice of intoxication acquired fresh -vogue, and the gorgeous gluttonies of the rich were further disgraced by -the shameful spectacle of drunkards, who lolled for hours over the -revelries which were inflamed by voluptuous music. Worst of all, the -purity of family life was invaded and broken down. Throwing aside the -old veiled seclusion of women in Oriental life, the ladies of Israel -showed themselves in the streets in all "the bravery of their tinkling -ornaments of gold," and sank into the adulterous courses stimulated by -their pampered effrontery. - -Such is the picture which we draw from the burning denunciations of the -peasant-prophet of Tekoa. He was no prophet nor prophet's son, but a -humble gatherer of sycomore-fruit, a toil which only fell to the -humblest of the people.[317] Who is not afraid, he asks, when a lion -roars? and how can a prophet be silent when the Lord God has spoken? -Indignation had transformed and dilated him from a labourer into a seer, -and had summoned him from the pastoral shades of his native -village--whether in Judah or in Israel is uncertain--to denounce the -more flagrant iniquities of the Northern capital.[318] First he -proclaims the vengeance of Jehovah upon the transgressions of the -Philistines, of Tyre, of Edom, of Ammon, of Moab, and even of Judah; and -then he turns with a crash upon apostatising Israel.[319] He speaks with -unsparing plainness of their pitiless greed, their shameless debauchery, -their exacting usury, their attempts to pervert even the abstinent -Nazarites into intemperance, and to silence the prophets by opposition -and obloquy. Jehovah was crushed under their violence.[320] And did they -think to go unscathed after such black ingratitude? Nay! their mightiest -should flee away naked in the day of defeat. Robbery was in their houses -of ivory, and the few of them who should escape the spoiler should only -be as when a shepherd tears out of the mouth of a lion two legs and a -piece of an ear?[321] As for Bethel, their shrine--which he calls -Bethaven, "House of Vanity," not Bethel, "House of God"--the horns of -its altars should be cut off. Should oppression and licentiousness -flourish? Jehovah would take them with hooks, and their children with -fish-hooks, and their sacrifices at Bethel and Gilgal should be utterly -unavailing. Drought, and blasting, and mildew, and wasting plague, and -earth-convulsions like those which had swallowed Sodom and Gomorrha, -from which they should only be plucked as a "firebrand out of the -burning," should warn them that they must prepare to meet their -God.[322] It was lamentable; but lamentation was vain, unless they would -return to Jehovah, Lord of hosts,[323] and abandon the false worship of -Bethel, Beersheba, and Gilgal, and listen to the voice of the righteous, -whom they now abhorred for his rebukes. They talked hypocritically about -"the day of the Lord," but to them it should be blackness. They relied -on feast days, and services, and sacrifices; but since they would not -give the sacrifice of judgment and righteousness, for which alone God -cared, they should be carried into captivity beyond Damascus: yes! even -to that terrible Assyria with whose king they now were on friendly -terms. They lay at ease on their carved couches at their delicate -feasts, draining the wine-bowls, and glistering with fragrant oils, -heedless of the impending doom which would smite the great house with -breaches and the little house with clefts, and which should bring upon -them an avenger who should afflict them from their conquered Hamath -southwards even to the wady of the wilderness.[324] The threatened -judgments of locusts and fire had been mitigated at the prophet's -prayer, but nothing could avert the plumb-line of destruction which -Jehovah held over them, and He would rise against the House of Jeroboam -with His sword.[325] We infer from all that Amos and Hosea say that the -calf-worship at Bethel (for Dan is not mentioned in this connexion[326]) -had degenerated into an idolatry far more abject than it originally -was. The familiarity of such multitudes of the people with Baal-worship -and Asherah-worship had tended to obliterate the sense that the "calves" -were cherubic emblems of Jehovah; and were it not for some confusions of -this kind, it is inconceivable that Jehoram ben-Jehu should have -restored the Asherah which his father had removed. Be that as it may, -Bethel and Gilgal seem to have become centres of corruption. Dan is -scarcely once alluded to as a scene of the calf-worship. - -Others, then, might be deceived by the surface-glitter of extended -empire in the days of Jeroboam II. Not so the true prophets. It has -often happened--as to Persia, when, in B.C. 388, she dictated the -Peace of Antalcidas, and to Papal Rome in the days of the Jubilee of -1300, and to Philip II. of Spain in the year of the Armada, and to -Louis XIV. in 1667--that a nation has seemed to be at its zenith of -pomp and power on the very eve of some tremendous catastrophe. Amos -and Hosea saw that such a catastrophe was at hand for Israel, because -they knew that Divine punishment inevitably dogs the heels of -insolence and crime. The loftiness of Israel's privilege involved the -utterness of her ruin. "You only have I known of all the families of -the earth: therefore I will visit upon you all your iniquities."[327] - -Such prophecies, so eloquent, so uncompromising, so varied, and so -constantly disseminated among the people, first by public harangues, -then in writing, could no longer be neglected. Amos, with his natural -culture, his rhythmic utterances, and his inextinguishable fire, was far -different from the wild fanatics, with their hairy garments, and sudden -movements, and long locks, and cries, and self-inflicted wounds, with -whom Israel had been familiar since the days of Elijah whom they all -imitated. So long as this inspired peasant confined himself to moral -denunciations the aristocracy and priesthood of Samaria could afford -comfortably to despise him. What were moral denunciations to them? What -harm was there in ivory palaces and refined feasts? This man was a mere -red socialist who tried to undermine the customs of society. The hold of -the upper classes on the people, whom their exactions had burdened with -hopeless debt, and whom they could with impunity crush into slavery, was -too strong to be shaken by the "hysteric gush" of a philanthropic -faddist and temperance fanatic like this. But when he had the enormous -presumption to mention publicly the name of their victorious king, and -to say that Jehovah would rise against him with the sword, it was time -for the clergy to interfere, and to send the intruder back to his native -obscurity. - -So Amaziah, the priest of Bethel,[328] invoked the king's authority. -"Amos," he said to the king, "hath conspired against thee in the midst -of the house of Israel." The charge was grossly false, but it did well -enough to serve the priest's purpose. "The land is not able to bear -all his words." - -That was true; for when nations have chosen to abide by their own -vicious courses, and refuse to listen to the voice of warning, they -are impatient of rebuke. They refuse to hear when God calls to them. - - "For when we in our viciousness grow hard, - Oh misery on it! the wise gods seal our eyes; - In our own filth drop our clear judgments; make us - Adore our errors; laugh at us while we strut - To our confusion." - -The priest tried further to inflame the king's anger by telling him -two more of Amos's supposed predictions. He had prophesied (which was -a false inference) that Israel should be led away captive out of their -own land,[329] and had also prophesied (which was a perversion of the -fact) "that Jeroboam _should die_ by the sword." - -At the first prophecy Jeroboam probably smiled. It might indeed come -true in the long-run. If he was a man of prescience as well as of -prowess, he probably foresaw that the elements of ruin lurked in his -transient success, and that though, for the present, Assyria was -occupied in other directions, it was unlikely that the weaker Israel -would escape the fate of the far more powerful Syria. As for the -personal prophecy, he was strong, and was honoured, and had his army -and his guards. He would take his chance. Nor does it seem to have -troubled any one that Amos looked for the ultimate union of Israel -with Judah. Since the time of Joash the inheritance of David had been -but as "a ruined booth" (ix. 11); but Amos prophesied its restoration. -This touch may have been added later, when he wrote and published his -"burdens"; but he did not hesitate to speak as if the two kingdoms -were really and properly one.[330] - -We are not told that Jeroboam II. interfered with the prophet in any -way.[331] Had he done so, he would have been rebuked and denounced for -it. He probably went no further than to allow the priest and the -prophet to settle the matter between themselves. Perhaps he gave a -contemptuous permission that, if Amaziah thought it worth while to -send the prophet back into Judah, he might do so. - -Armed with this nonchalant mandate, Amaziah, with more mildness and -good-humour than might have been expected from one of his class, said -to Amos, "O Seer,[332] go home, and eat thy bread, and prophesy to thy -heart's content at home; but do not prophesy any more at Bethel, for -it is the king's sanctuary and the king's court." - -Amos obeyed perforce, but stopped to say that he had not prophesied -out of his own mouth, but by Jehovah's bidding. He then hurled at the -priest a message of doom as frightful as that which Jeremiah -pronounced upon Pashur, when that priest smote him on the face. His -wife should be a harlot in the city; his sons and daughters should be -slain; his inheritance should be divided; he should die in a polluted -land; and Israel should go into captivity. And as for his mission, he -justified it by the fact that he was not one of an hereditary or a -professional community; he was no prophet or prophet's son. Such men -might--like Zedekiah, the son of Chenaanah, and his four hundred -abettors--be led into mere function and professionalism, into -manufactured enthusiasm and simulated inspiration. From such -communities freshness, unconventionality, courage, were hardly to be -expected. They would philippise at times; they would get to love their -order and their privileges better than their message, and themselves -best of all. It is the tendency of organised bodies to be tempted into -conventionality, and to sink into banded unions chiefly concerned in -the protection of their own prestige. Not such was Amos. He was a -peasant herdsman in whose heart had burned the inspiration of Jehovah -and the wrath against moral misdoing till they had burst into flame. -It was indignation against iniquity which had called Amos from the -flocks and the sycomores to launch against an apostatising people the -menace of doom. In that grief and indignation he heard the voice and -received the mandate of the Lord of hosts. He heads the long line of -literary prophets whose priceless utterances are preserved in the Old -Testament. The inestimable value of their teaching lies most of all in -the fact that they were--like Moses--preachers of the moral law; and -that, like the Book of the Covenant, which is the most ancient and the -most valuable part of the Laws of the Pentateuch, they count external -service as no better than the small dust of the balance in comparison -with righteousness and true holiness. - -The rest of the predictions of Amos were added at a later date. They -dwelt on the certainty and the awful details of the coming overthrow; -the doom of the idolaters of Gilgal and Beersheba; the inevitable -swiftness of the catastrophe in which Samaria should be sifted like -corn in a sieve in spite of her incorrigible security.[333] Yet the -ruin should not be absolute. "Thus saith Jehovah: As the shepherd -teareth out of the mouth of the lion two legs and the piece of an ear, -so shall the children of Israel be rescued, that sit in Samaria on the -corner of a couch, and on the damask of a bed." - -The Hebrew Prophets almost invariably weave together the triple strands -of warning, exhortation, and hope. Hitherto Amos has not had a word of -hope to utter. At last, however, he lets a glimpse of the rainbow -irradiate the gloom. The overthrow of Israel should be accompanied by -the restoration of the fallen booth of David, and, under the rule of a -scion of that house, Israel should return from captivity to enjoy days -of peaceful happiness, and to be rooted up no more.[334] - - * * * * * - -Hosea, the son of Beeri, was of a somewhat later date than Amos. He, -too, "became electric," to flash into meaner and corrupted minds the -conviction that formalism is nothing, and that moral sincerity is all -in all. That which God requires is not ritual service, but truth in -the inward parts. He is one of the saddest of the prophets; but -though he mingles prophecies of mercy with his menaces of wrath, the -general tenor of his oracles is the same. He pictures the crimes of -Ephraim by the image of domestic unfaithfulness, and bids Judah to -take warning from the curse involved in her apostasy.[335] Many of his -allusions touch upon the days of that deluge of anarchy which followed -the death of Jeroboam II. (iv.-vi. 3). That he was a Northerner -appears from the fact that he speaks of the King of Israel as "our -king" (vii. 5). Yet he seems to blame the revolt of Jeroboam I. (i. -11, viii. 4), although a prophet had originated it, and he openly -aspires after the reunion of the Twelve Tribes under a king of the -House of David (iii. 5). He points more distinctly to Assyria, which -he frequently names as the scourge of the Divine vengeance, and -indicates how vain is the hope of the party which relied on the -alliance of Egypt.[336] He speaks with far more distinct contempt of -the cherub at Bethel and the shrine at Gilgal, and says scornfully, -"Thy calf, O Samaria, has cast thee off."[337] Shalmaneser had taken -Beth-Arbel, and dashed to pieces mother and children. Such would be -the fate of the cities of Israel.[338] Yet Hosea, like Amos, cannot -conclude with words of wrath and woe, and he ends with a lovely song -of the days when Ephraim should be restored, after her true -repentance, by the loving tenderness of God. - -Jeroboam II. must have been aware of some at least of these prophecies. -Those of Hosea must have impressed him all the more because Hosea was a -prophet of his own kingdom, and all of his allusions were to such -ancient and famous shrines of Ephraim as Mizpeh, Tabor, Bethel, Gilgal, -Shechem,[339] Jezreel, and Lebanon. He was the Jeremiah of the North, -and a passionate patriotism breathes through his melancholy strains. Yet -in the powerful rule of Jeroboam II. he can only see a godless -militarism founded upon massacre (i. 4), and he felt himself to be the -prophet of decadence. Page after page rings with wailing, and with -denunciations of drunkenness, robbery, and whoredom--"swearing, lying, -killing, stealing, and adultery" (iv. 2). - -If Jeroboam was as wise and great as he seemed to have been, he must -have seen with his own eyes the ominous clouds on the far horizon, and -the deep-seated corruption which was eating like a cancer into the -heart of his people. Probably, like many another great sovereign--like -Marcus Aurelius when he noted the worthlessness of his son Commodus, -like Charlemagne when he burst into tears at the sight of the ships of -the Vikings--his thoughts were like those of the ancient and modern -proverbs--"When I am dead, let earth be mixed with fire." We have no -trace that Jeroboam treated Hosea as did those guilty priests to whom -he was a rebuke, and who called him "a fool" and "mad" (ix. 7, 8, iv. -6-8, v. 2). Yet the aged king--he must have reached the unusual age -of seventy-three at least, before he ended the longest and most -successful reign in the annals of Israel--could hardly have -anticipated that within half a year of his death his secure throne -would be shaken to its foundation, his dynasty be hurled into -oblivion, and that Israel, to whom, as long as he lived, mighty -kingdoms had curtsied, should, - - "Like a forlorn and desperate castaway, - Do shameful execution on herself." - -Yet so it was. Jeroboam II. was succeeded by no less than six other -kings, but he was the last who died a natural death. Every one of his -successors fell a victim to the assassin or the conqueror. His son -Zachariah ("Remembered by Jehovah") succeeded him (B.C. 740), the -fourth in descent from Jehu. Considering the long reign of his father, -he must have ascended the throne at a mature age. But he was the child -of evil times. That he should not interrupt the "calf"-worship was a -matter of course; but if he be the king of whom we catch a glimpse in -Hos. vii. 2-7, we see that he partook deeply of the depravity of his -day. We are there presented with a deplorable picture. There was -thievishness at home, and bands of marauding bandits began to appear -from abroad. The king was surrounded by a desperate knot of wicked -counsellors, who fooled him to the top of his bent, and corrupted him -to the utmost of his capacity. They were all scorners and adulterers, -whose furious passions the prophet compares to the glowing heat of an -oven heated by the baker. They made the king glad with their -wickedness, and the princes with lying flatteries. On the royal -birthday, apparently at some public feast, this band of infamous -revellers, who were the boon companions of Zachariah, first made him -sick with bottles of wine, and then having set an ambush in waiting, -murdered the effeminate and self-indulgent debauchee before all the -people.[340] The scene reads like the assassination of a Commodus or -an Elagabalus. No one was likely to raise a hand in his favour. Like -our Edward II., he was a weakling who followed a great and warlike -father. It was evident that troublous times were near at hand, and -nothing but the worst disasters could ensue if there was no one better -than such a drunkard as Zachariah to stand at the helm of state. - -So did the dynasty of the mighty Jehu expire like a torch blown out in -stench and smoke. - -Its close is memorable most of all because it evoked the magnificent -moral and spiritual teaching of Hebrew prophecy. The ideal prophet and -the ordinary priest are as necessarily opposed to each other as the -saint and the formalist. The glory of prophecy lies in its recognition -that right is always right, and wrong always wrong, apart from all -expediency and all casuistry, apart from "all prejudices, private -interests, and partial affections." "What Jehovah demands," they -taught, "is righteousness--neither more nor less; what He hates is -injustice. Sin or offence to the Deity is a thing of purely moral -character. Morality is that for the sake of which all other things -exist; it is the most essential element of all sincere religion. It is -no postulate, no idea, but a necessity and a fact; the most intensely -living of human powers--Jehovah, the God of hosts. In wrath, in ruin, -this holy reality makes its existence known; it annihilates all that -is hollow and false."[341] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[313] Amos vii. 1. Famine (iv. 6); drought (iv. 7, 8); yellow blight and -locusts (iv. 9); pestilence (iv. 10); earthquake and burning (iv. 11). - -[314] Amos vii. 4. - -[315] Amos i. 1, iii. 14, iv. 11, viii 8; Zech. xiv. 5: "Ye shall flee -like as ye fled before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah." Josephus -says that in an earthquake a little before the birth of Christ ten -thousand were buried under the ruined houses (_Antt._, XV. v. 2), and -he has many Rabbinic haggadoth to tell us about the earthquake, which, -he says, happened at the moment when Uzziah burnt incense in the -Temple (_Antt._, IX. x. 4). - -[316] According to Hind, they took place on June 15th, B.C. 763, and -February 9th, B.C. 784. Amos alludes to the capture of Gath by Uzziah, -of Calneh (_Ktesiphon_), and of Hamath (vi. 2; 2 Chron. xxvi. 6). Gath -henceforth disappears from the Philistian Pentapolis (Amos i. 7, 8; -Zeph. ii. 4; Zech. ix. 5). - -[317] Or "dresser of sycomore-trees" (R.V.). LXX., [Greek: knizn -sykamina]; Vulg., _vellicans sycomoros_. The sycomore-fruit (fruit of -the _Ficus sycomorus_, or wild fig) is ripened by puncturing it -(Theoph., _H. Plant._, iv. 2; Pliny, _H. N._, xiii. 14). - -[318] The well-known town of Tekoa had been Solomon's horse-fair, and -had been fortified by Rehoboam (2 Chron. xi. 6). It lay in a wild -country six miles south of Bethlehem (2 Chron. xx. 20; 1 Macc. ix. 33; -Robinson, _Bibl. Res._, i. 486). For a fuller account of these -prophets, I must refer to my book on _The Minor Prophets_ in the "Men -of the Bible" Series. It has always been assumed that Amos belonged to -the well-known Tekoa, and was therefore a subject of the Southern -Kingdom. In recent days this has become uncertain. No sycomores grow -or can grow on the bleak uplands of Tekoa (Tristram, _Nat. Hist. of -the Bible_, p. 397); so that Jerome, in his preface to Amos, thinks -that "brambles" are intended. Even Kimchi conjectured that Tekoa was -an unknown town in the tribe of Asher. Amos's allusions to scenery are -all applicable to the Northern landscape. - -[319] Amos i. 1-ii. 5. - -[320] Amos ii. 6-13. - -[321] Amos iii. 9-15. - -[322] Amos iv. 1-13. - -[323] This title, "Jehovah-Tsebaoth," now begins to occur. It is not -found in the Hexateuch. It probably means "Lord of the _starry hosts_." -Contact with Assyria first made the Israelites acquainted with -star-worship. Amos alludes to the Pleiades and Orion (v. 8: comp. Job -ix. 9, xxxviii. 31). Star-worship is forbidden in Deuteronomy. In Amos -v. 26 the true meaning is that the Israelites _would take with them, on -their road to exile_, Sakkuth (Moloch?) and Kewan (the god-star Saturn). - -[324] Amos vi. 1-14. - -[325] Amos vii. 1-9. - -[326] Strange as it may seem, the early authority for the existence of -any calf at Dan is very slight, and the extreme uncertainty of the -reading and interpretation in one main passage (1 Kings xii. 32) makes -it at least possible that there were _two calves at Bethel_, and that -at Dan there was no calf, but only the old idolatrous ephod of Micah, -still served by the servant of Moses. See additional note at the end -of the volume. - -[327] Amos iii. 2. - -[328] That the chief priest of Bethel bore the name "Jehovah is -strong" shows once more that "calf-worship" was in no sense a -_substitute_ for the worship of Jehovah. - -[329] This was not quite accurate; he had rather prophesied the -devastation of the high places (vii. 9). In fact, his words had often -been very vague. "_Thus_ will I do unto thee" (iv. 12). - -[330] Amos ix. 11-15. Comp. Hos. iii. 5. - -[331] The exaggerated haggadoth of later days say that Amaziah had -Amos beaten with leaded thongs, and that he was carried home in a -dying state (Epiphan., _Opp._, ii. 145), to which there is a supposed -allusion in Heb. xi. 35: [Greek: alloi de etumpanisthsan]. - -[332] We cannot be sure that the term "Seer" was meant to be -contemptuous, although from 1 Sam. ix. 9 we should infer that the -title had become somewhat obsolete. Further, we must bear in mind that -it may not have been always easy for worldlings to distinguish between -true prophets and the unprincipled pretenders who, about this time, -succeeded in making the name and aspect of a prophet so complete a -disgrace that men had carefully to disclaim it (Zech. xiii. 2-6). It -is true that the heading of Amos (i. 1), which may not, however, be by -the prophet himself, tells us of "the words which he _saw_" (_i.e._, -spoke as a seer), and he also disclaims the name of prophet (vii. 14). - -[333] Amos viii. 1-ix. 9, 10. - -[334] Amos ix. 11-15. - -[335] Hos. iv. 15-19. - -[336] Hos. v. 13, vii. 11, viii. 9, ix. 3-6, xi. 5, xii. 1, xiv. 3. It -must be borne in mind that the cuneiform inscriptions prove that -Assyria had burst into sight like a lurid comet on the horizon far -earlier than we had supposed. Jehu had paid tribute to Shalmaneser as -far back as B.C. 842, more than a century before Menahem's tribute in -738. The destruction which Hosea prophesied took place within -thirty-one years of his prophecies--probably in B.C. 722, when Sargon -finished the siege of Samaria begun by Shalmaneser. The king Hoshea -was perhaps taken captive before the siege. - -[337] Hos. viii. 5, ix. 15. - -[338] Hos. x. 13, 14. - -[339] Hos. vi. 9: for "by consent" read "towards Shechem." - -[340] Hos. vii. 3-7. The allusions are vague, but we see a drunken -king among his drunken princes, surrounded by wicked plotters who have -flattered his vices. He is ignorant of his peril. The subjects aid the -rulers in these abominations. All are blazing, like an oven, with -passion and infamy, and only rest (as the baker does) to acquire new -strength for inflaming their burning desires. At the dawn their -treachery blazes into the crime of murder, and in the wine-sick -fever-heat of the banquet the king is murdered by his corrupt -intimates (see my _Minor Prophets_, p. 78). - -[341] Wellhausen, _Isr. and Jud._, 85. - - - - - CHAPTER XIX - - _AZARIAH-UZZIAH_ (B.C. 783(?)-737) - - _JOTHAM_ (B.C. 737-735) - - 2 KINGS xv. 1-7, 32-38 - - "This is vanity, and it is a sore sickness."--ECCLES. vi. 2. - - -Before we watch the last "glimmerings and decays" of the Northern -Kingdom, we must once more revert to the fortunes of the House of David. -Judah partook of the better fortunes of Israel. She, too, enjoyed the -respite caused by the crippling of the power of Syria, and the cessation -from aggression of the Assyrian kings, who, for a century, were either -unambitious monarchs like Assurdan, or were engaged in fighting on their -own northern and eastern frontiers. Judah, too, like Israel, was happy -in the long and wise governance of a faithful king. - -This king was Azariah ("My strength is Jehovah"), the son of Amaziah. He -is called Uzziah by the Chronicler, and in some verses of the brief -references to his long reign in the Book of Kings. It is not certain -that he was the eldest son of Amaziah;[342] but he was so distinctly the -ablest, that, at the age of sixteen, he was chosen king by "all the -people." His official title to the world must have been Azariah, for in -that form his name occurs in the Assyrian records. Uzziah seems to have -been the more familiar title which he bore among his people.[343] There -seems to be an allusion to both names--Jehovah-his-helper, and -Jehovah-his-strength--in the Chronicles: "God _helped him_, and made him -to prosper; and his name spread far abroad, and he was marvellously -helped, _till he was strong_." - -The Book of Kings only devotes a few verses to him; but from the -Chronicler we learn much more about his prosperous activity. His first -achievement was to recover and fortify the port of Elath, on the Red -Sea,[344] and to reduce the Edomites to the position they had held in -the earlier days of his father's reign. This gave security to his -commerce, and at once "his name spread far abroad, even to the -entering in of Egypt." - -He next subdued the Philistines; took Gath, Jabneh, and Ashdod; -dismantled their fortifications, filled them with Hebrew colonists, -and "smote all Palestine with a rod."[345] - -He then chastised the roving Arabs of the Negeb or south country in -Gur-Baal and Maon, and suppressed their plundering incursions. - -His next achievement was to reduce the Ammonite Emrs to the position -of tributaries, and to enforce from them rights of pasturage for his -large flocks, not only in the low country (_shephelah_), but in the -southern wilderness (_midbar_), and in the _carmels_ or fertile -grounds among the Trans-Jordanic hills. - -Having thus subdued his enemies on all sides, he turned his attention -to home affairs--built towers, strengthened the walls of Jerusalem at -its most assailable points, provided catapults and other instruments -of war, and rendered a permanent benefit to Jerusalem by irrigation -and the storing of rain-water in tanks. - -All these improvements so greatly increased his wealth and importance -that he was able to renew David's old force of heroes (Gibborim), and to -increase their number from six hundred to two thousand six hundred, whom -he carefully enrolled, equipped with armour, and trained in the use of -engines of war. And he not only extended his boundaries southwards and -eastwards, but appears to have been strong enough, after the death of -Jeroboam II., to make an expedition northwards, and to have headed a -Syrian coalition against Tiglath-Pileser III., in B.C. 738. He is -mentioned in two notable fragments of the annals of the eighth year of -this Assyrian king. He is there called Azrijahu, and both his forces and -those of Hamath seem to have suffered a defeat.[346] - -It is distressing to find that a king so good and so great ended his -days in overwhelming and irretrievable misfortune. The glorious reign -had a ghastly conclusion. All that the historian tells us is that "the -Lord smote the king, so that he was a leper, and dwelt in a several -[_i.e._, a separate] house." The word rendered "a several house" may -perhaps mean (as in the margin of the A.V.) "a lazar house," like the -_Beit el Massakn_ or "house of the unfortunate," the hospital or -abode of lepers, outside the walls of Jerusalem.[347] The rendering is -uncertain, but it is by no means impossible that the prevalence of the -affliction had, even in those early days, created a retreat for those -thus smitten, especially as they formed a numerous class. Obviously -the king could no more fulfil his royal duties. A leper becomes a -horrible object, and no one would have been more anxious than the -unhappy Azariah himself to conceal his aspect from the eyes of his -people.[348] His son Jotham was set over the household; and though he -is not called a regent or joint-king--for this institution does not -seem to have existed among the ancient Hebrews--he acted as judge over -the people of the land. - -We are told that Isaiah wrote the annals of this king's reign, but we -do not know whether it was from Isaiah's biography that the Chronicler -took the story of the manner in which Uzziah was smitten with leprosy. -The Chronicler says that his heart was puffed up with his successes -and his prosperity, and that he was consequently led to thrust himself -into the priest's office by burning incense in the Temple.[349] -Solomon appears to have done the same without the least question of -opposition; but now the times were changed, and Azariah, the high -priest,[350] and eighty of his colleagues went in a body to prevent -Uzziah, to rebuke him, and to order him out of the Holy Place.[351] -The opposition kindled him into the fiercest anger, and at this moment -of hot altercation the red spot of leprosy suddenly rose and burned -upon his forehead. The priests looked with horror on the fatal sign; -and the stricken king, himself horrified at this awful visitation of -God, ceased to resist the priests, and rushed forth to relieve the -Temple of his unclean presence, and to linger out the sad remnant of -his days in the living death of that most dishonouring disease. Surely -no man was ever smitten down from the summits of splendour to a lower -abyss of unspeakable calamity! We can but trust that the misery only -laid waste the few last years of his reign; for Jotham was twenty-five -when he began to reign, and he must have been more than a mere boy -when he was set to perform his father's duties. - -So the glory of Uzziah faded into dust and darkness. At the age of -sixty-eight death came as the welcome release from his miseries, and -"they buried him with his fathers in the City of David." The -Levitically scrupulous Chronicler adds that he was not laid in the -actual sepulchre of his fathers, but in a field of burial which -belonged to them--"for they said, He is a leper." The general outline -of his reign resembled that of his father's. It began well; it fell by -pride; it closed in misery. - -The annals of his son Jotham were not eventful, and he died at the age -of forty-one or earlier. He is said to have reigned sixteen years, but -there are insuperable difficulties about the chronology of his reign, -which can only be solved by hazardous conjectures.[352] He was a good -king, "howbeit the high places were not removed." The Chronicler -speaks of him chiefly as a builder. He built or restored the northern -gate of the Temple, and defended Judah with fortresses and towns. But -the glory and strength of his father's reign faded away under his -rule. He did indeed suppress a revolt of the Ammonites, and exacted -from them a heavy indemnity; but shortly afterwards the inaction of -Assyria led to an alliance between Pekah, King of Israel, and Rezin, -King of Damascus; and these kings harassed Jotham--perhaps because he -refused to become a member of their coalition. The good king must also -have been pained by the signs of moral degeneracy all around him in -the customs of his own people. It was "in the year that King Uzziah -died" that Isaiah saw his first vision, and he gives us a deplorable -picture of contemporary laxity. Whatever the king may have been, the -princes were no better than "rulers of Sodom," and the people were -"people of Gomorrha." There was abundance of lip-worship, but little -sincerity; plentiful religionism, but no godliness. Superstition went -hand in hand with formalism, and the scrupulosity of outward service -was made a substitute for righteousness and true holiness. This was -the deadliest characteristic of this epoch, as we find it portrayed in -the first chapter of Isaiah. The faithful city had become a -harlot--but not in outward semblance. She "reflected heaven on her -surface, and hid Gomorrha in her heart." Righteousness had dwelt in -her--but now murderers; but the murderers wore phylacteries, and for a -pretence made long prayers. It was this deep-seated hypocrisy, this -pretence of religion without the reality, which called forth the -loudest crashes of Isaiah's thunder. There is more hope for a country -avowedly guilty and irreligious than for one which makes its -scrupulous ceremonialism a cloak of maliciousness. And thus there lay -at the heart of Isaiah's message that protest for bare morality, as -constituting the end and the essence of religion, which we find in all -the earliest and greatest prophets:-- - - "Hear the word of the Lord, ye rulers of Sodom; - Give ear unto the Law of our God, ye people of Gomorrha! - To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith - the Lord. - I am full of the burnt-offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; - And I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of - he-goats. - When ye come to see My face, who hath required this at your hands, to - trample My courts? - Bring no more vain oblations! - Incense is an abomination unto Me: - New moon and sabbath, the calling of assemblies-- - I cannot away with iniquity and the solemn meeting... - Wash you! make you clean!"[353] - -Of Jotham we hear nothing more. He died a natural death at an early -age. If the years of his reign are counted from the time when his -father's affliction devolved on him the responsibilities of office, it -is probable that he did not long survive the illustrious leper, but -was buried soon after him in the City of David his father. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[342] Hence, perhaps, the expression that the people "took him." If -Amaziah died at fifty-nine, he probably had other sons. - -[343] Compare the interchange of the names Azariel and Uzziel (Exod. -vi. 18) in 1 Chron. vi. 2, 18. Azariah means "Jehovah hath helped," -and Uzziah "Strength of Jehovah." It is just possible that his name -was changed at his accession, as the chief priest also was named -Azariah, and confusion might otherwise have arisen. - -[344] 2 Chron. xxvi. 2-15. - -[345] Isa. xiv. 29. A mixed language arose in this district in -consequence (Neh. xiii. 24; Zech. ix. 6). The word Palestine only -applies strictly to the district of Philistia. Milton uses it, with -his usual accuracy, in the description of Dagon as - - "That twice-battered god of Palestine." - -[346] Uzziah's opposition to Assyria--of which there seems to be no -doubt, for he must be the Azrijahu of the _Eponym Canon_--took place -about 738, and was a coalition movement. But it gives rise to great -chronological and other difficulties. As the solution of these is at -present only conjectural, I refer to Schrader (E. Tr.), ii. 211-219. -He is called Azrijahu Jahudai. - -[347] 2 Kings xv. 5 (2 Chron. xxvi. 21, "a house of sickness"). LXX., -[Greek: en oik aphphousth]; Vulg., _in domo libera seorsim_. Comp -Lev. xiii. 46. Theodoret understands it that he was shut up privately -in his own palace: [Greek: endon en thalam hyp' oudenos hormenos]. -Symmachus, [Greek: egkekleismenos]. - -[348] His misfortune must have made a deep impression, and is possibly -alluded to in Hos. iv. 4: "For thy people are as they that strive with -the priest." - -[349] The Chronicler attributes the good part of his reign to the -influence of an unknown Zechariah, "who had understanding in the visions -of God"; and says that when Zechariah died Uzziah altered for the worse. - -[350] This high priest, Azariah, is only mentioned elsewhere in 2 -Chron. xxvi. 17, 20. - -[351] Josephus says that he had put on a priestly robe, and that a -great feast was going on, and that the earthquake (Amos i. 1; Zech. -xiv. 5) happened at the moment, which broke the Temple roof, so that a -sunbeam smote his head and produced the leprosy. We here see the -growth of the Haggadah. - -[352] For instance, two verses earlier (2 Kings xv. 30) we read of the -twentieth year of Jotham. - -[353] Isa. i. 10-17. - - - - - CHAPTER XX. - - _THE AGONY OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM._ - - B.C. - Shallum 740 - Menahem 740-737 - Pekahiah 737-735 - Pekah 735-734 - - 2 KINGS xv. 8-31 - - "Blood toucheth blood."--HOS. iv. 2. - - "The revolters are profuse in murders."--HOS. v. 2. - - "They have set up kings, but not by Me: they have made princes, - and I knew it not."--HOS. viii. 4. - - "Non tam reges fuere quam fures, latrones, et tyranni."--WITSIUS, - _Decaph._, 326. - - -With the death of Zachariah begins the acute agony of Israel's -dissolution. Four kings were murdered in forty years. Indeed, within -two centuries, at least nine kings--Nadab, Elah, Zimri, Tibni, -Jehoram, Zachariah, Shallum, Pekahiah, Pekah--had made the steps of -the throne slippery with blood. Except in the house of Omri, all the -kings of Israel either left no sons or left them to be slain. Amos, by -his vision of the basket of summer fruit, had intimated that the sins -of Israel were ripe for punishment, and the lesson had been emphasised -by the paronomasia of _quts_, "summer," and _queets_, "end."[354] The -prophet had singled four out of many crimes as the cause of her ruin. -They were (1) greedy oppression of the poor; (2) land-grabbing; (3) -licentious and idolatrous revelries; (4) cruelty to poor debtors, and -rioting on the proceeds of unjust gains. In their drunkenness they -even tempted God's Nazarites to break their vows. "Behold," saith -Jehovah, "I am pressed under you, as a cart is pressed that is full of -sheaves." Even women shared in the common intoxication, and showed -themselves utterly shameless, so that Amos contemptuously calls them -"fat cows of Bashan upon the mountain of Samaria," whom in punishment -the brutal conqueror should drag by the hair out of their ivory -palaces, as a fisherman drags his prey out of the water by hooks.[355] - -Shallum, son of Jabesh, the unknown murderer of Zachariah and the -usurper of his throne, suffered the fate of Zimri, and only reigned for -one month. If his conspiracy was marked by the odious circumstances of -treachery and corruption, which we infer from the allusions of Hosea, -Shallum richly deserved the swift retribution which fell upon him. He -seems to have destroyed Zachariah by means of his best affections--under -the guise of friendship, in the midst of boon companionship. But the -slayer of his master had no peace, and from the moment of his fruitless -crime the unhappy country seems to have been plunged in the horrors of -civil war. Some dim glimpses of the evils of the day are gained from the -earlier Zechariah,[356] just as some dim glimpses of the horrors of Rome -in the days of the later Csars may be seen in the Apocalypse. The -prophet speaks of three shepherds cut off in one month, who abhorred -God, and His soul was impatient at them.[357] - -Just as Galba, Otho, and Vitellius flit across the stage of the Empire -amid war and assassinations, so Zachariah and Shallum are swept away by -"dagger-thrusts through the purple." Was there a third? Ewald and others -think that they detect a shadowy outline of him and of his name in 2 -Kings xv. 10. If so, his name was Kobolam, but we know no more of him -beyond the fact that "he was, and is not." For the sacred annals are but -little concerned with this bloody phantasmagoria of feeble kings, who -ruled amid usurpation, anarchy, hostile attacks from without, and civil -war within. "Israel," said Hosea, "hath cast off the thing that is good: -the enemy shall pursue him. They have set up kings, but not by Me: they -have made princes, and I knew it not." "They are all as hot as an oven, -and have devoured their judges; all their kings have fallen; there is -none among them that calleth upon Me."[358] - -It was perhaps during this distracted epoch that for one moment there -was an attempt to place the ruling authority of the nation in the -hands of the prophet himself. So it would appear from Zech. xi. 7-14. -Of course these chapters may be allegorical throughout, as, in any -case, they are in great part. But if so, it becomes more difficult to -understand the meaning. What the prophet says is as follows:-- - -First, as though he saw the terrible conflagration of the Assyrian -tyranny rolling southwards, and felt it to be irresistible, he bids -Lebanon open her doors, that the fire may devour her cedars. There is -perhaps an allusion to the death of Jeroboam II. in the words, "Howl -fir tree, for the cedar is fallen." He sees in vision the forces of -devastation raging among the oaks of Bashan, the forest and the -vintage, while the shepherds cry, and the ousted lions roar in vain. -Then Jehovah bids him feed "the flock of the slaughter"--the flock -sold remorselessly by its rich possessors, and slain, and left -unpitied, as the people were despoiled by its nobles and its kings. -The prophet undertakes the charge of the miserable flock, and takes -two staves, one of which he calls "Prosperity," and the other "Union." -While he was thus engaged three shepherds were cut off in one -month,[359] whom he loathed, and who abhorred him. But he finds his -task hopeless, and flings it up; and in sign that his covenant with -the people is broken, he breaks his staff "Prosperity." The nation -refused to pay him anything for his services, except a paltry sum of -thirty pieces of silver, and these he disdainfully flung into the -sacred treasury.[360] Then seeing that all hope of union between -Israel and Judah was at an end, he broke his staff "Union." Lastly, -Jehovah says He will raise up a foolish, neglectful, cruel shepherd -who would care for nothing but to eat the flesh of the fat and break -the hoofs of the flock. And as for this worthless shepherd, the sword -should be upon his arm and in his right eye; his arm shall be dried -up, and his right eye utterly darkened. - -By this cruel and self-seeking shepherd is probably meant Menahem. He -had been, according to Josephus, the captain of the guard, and was -living at Tirzah, the old beautiful capital of the land. From Tirzah, -where he occupied the position of the captain of the chariots, he -marched on the ill-supported Shallum. Samaria apparently offered no -protection to the usurper. Menahem defeated him and put him to death. -Then he proceeded to enforce the allegiance of the rest of the -country. An otherwise unknown town of the name of Tiphsach[361] -ventured to resist him. Menahem conquered it, and perhaps thinking, as -Machiavelli thought, that princes had better exhibit their utmost -cruelty at first, to deter any further opposition, he let loose his -ferocity on the town in a way which created a shuddering remembrance. -As though he had been one of the ferocious heathen, who had never been -restrained by the knowledge of God, he exhibited the extreme of -callous brutality by ripping up all the women that were with -child.[362] In this he followed the remorseless example of Hazael. -Hosea had prophesied that this should be the fate of Samaria;[363] -Amos had denounced the Ammonites for acting thus in the cities of -Gilead;[364] Shalmaneser III. had, in B.C. 732, thus avenged himself -on the resistance of Beth-Arbel,[365] and Assyria was ultimately to -meet an analogous retribution,[366] as also was Babylon.[367] But that -a king of Ephraim, of God's chosen people, should act thus to his own -brethren was a horrible portent, ominous of swift destruction. - -And the vengeance came. Menahem reigned, at least in name, for ten -years; for the sword which had slain mothers with their unborn infants -reduced the stricken people to terrified silence. But at this epoch -Assyria woke once more from her lethargy, and became the scourge of God -to the guilty people and their guiltier kings. For a whole century the -Assyrians had either been governed by kings who had abjured the lust of -blood and conquest, or had been too seriously occupied on their own -eastern and northern frontiers to intermeddle with the southern -kingdoms, or break down the barriers erected by the confederacy of -Hamath and Damascus between Nineveh and the weaker principalities of -Palestine. But now (B.C. 745) there came to the throne a king who, in -Chalda, was known by the name of Pul, and in Assyria by the name of -Tiglath-Pileser;[368] and being too formidable for any power to stay his -path, he marched against Menahem. Already he was lord of the world from -the Caspian to the Gulf of Persia; already he had subdued Babylonia, -Elam, Media, Armenia, eastward--Mesopotamia and Syria westward. Who was -Menahem, the petty usurper of a tenth-rate kingdom, that he should -withstand his power or even retard his advance? - -The cruel usurper was in no condition to resist him. The brand of Cain -was on him and his kingdom. How could the weak, impoverished, harassed -troops of Israel stand up in battle against those numberless serried -ranks, or withstand their tremendous discipline? If the very name of -Persia once struck terror into the brave Greeks before the spell of -Persian ascendency was broken at Marathon, Thermopyl, and Salamis, -much more did the name of Assyria make the hearts of the wretched -Israelites melt like water. They now for the first time saw those -bearded warriors with their broad swords, their tremendous bows, their -fierce, sensual faces, their thickset figures. In the language of the -prophets we still hear the echo of the fears which they excited by -their swift, unfaltering marches, their sleepless vigilance, their -girded loins, stout sandals, and barbed arrows.[369] - -"Their horses' hoofs," says Isaiah, "shall be like flint, and their -wheels like a whirlwind: their roaring shall be like a lion, they -shall roar like young lions; yea, they shall roar, and lay hold of the -prey, and carry it away safe, and there shall be none to deliver. And -they shall roar against them in that day like the roaring of the sea; -and if one look unto the land, behold darkness and distress, and the -light is darkened in the clouds thereof." - -Ancient Assyria lay beneath the Snowy Mountains of Kurdistan; and its -capital, Nineveh--near Mosul, Kouyunjik, and Neby-Junus--lay six -hundred miles from the Gulf of Persia. The people spoke, as their -descendants still speak, a dialect of Syriac, akin both grammatically -and structurally to Hebrew. Assyria was constantly at war with -Babylonia; but for the most part the kings of Assyria held Babylon in -subjection, and Tiglath-Pileser was a king of the Chaldans under the -name Pul, as well as a king of Nineveh. - -Menahem was warrior enough to know how hopeless it was to struggle -against these trained forces. He was not even secure on his own -throne. He thought it best to offer himself without resistance as a -feudatory, if the Assyrian King would confirm his sovereignty. -Tiglath-Pileser did not think Menahem worth more trouble, and was -graciously pleased to accept by way of bribe a tribute of a thousand -talents of silver, or about 125,000. This, however, as we learn from -the _Eponym Canon_, was not all. Menahem had to pay a further tribute -year by year. Later on, in 738, Shalmaneser mentions Minik-himmi -(Menahem), as well as Rasunnu (Rezin), among his tributaries. - -The Assyrian withdrew, and Menahem had to exact this vast sum of money -from his miserable subjects. To tax the poor was hopeless. He found that -there were some sixty thousand persons who might be reckoned among the -wealthier farmers and proprietors,[370] and from them he at once exacted -fifty shekels of silver (more than 3) apiece. Probably they thought -that to pay the sum demanded was not too heavy a price for the -retirement of these frightful Assyrians, whose forces Tiglath-Pileser -did not withdraw until he had the money in hand. The event took place in -738, and Tiglath-Pileser continued to reign till 727. How bitterly the -burden of foreign tribute was felt appears from Hos. viii. 9, 10, which -should perhaps be rendered, "They are gone up to Assyria like a wild ass -alone by himself. Ephraim hath hired lovers. And they begin to be -minished by reason of the burden of the king of princes." "The king of -princes" was the haughty title usurped by Tiglath-Pileser, who said, -"Are not my princes all of them kings?" (Isa. x. 8). - -All this was a fulfilment of what Hosea had foreseen:-- - -"Ephraim is oppressed, he is crushed in judgment, because he was content -to walk after vanity. Therefore am I unto Ephraim as a moth, and to the -house of Judah as rottenness. When Ephraim saw his sickness, and the -house of Judah his wound, then went Ephraim to Assyria, and sent unto an -avenging king:[371] yet could he not heal you, nor cure you of your -wound. For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion, and as a young lion to the -House of Judah: I, even I, will tear and go away; I will take away, and -none shall rescue him." The Assyrian was irresistible, because he was -the destined instrument of the wrath of God. The "mixing with the -heathens" was a sin, and Israel in cooing to Assyria was like a foolish -dove; but the day sometimes comes to doomed nations when no course can -save them from the fate which they have provoked.[372] - -Not long afterwards Menahem died, and he had sufficiently established -his rule to be succeeded as a matter of course by his son Pekahiah. But - - "Revenge and wrong bring forth their kind; - The foul cubs like their parents are." - -Samaria had fearful object-lessons in the apparently immediate success -of murder and rebellion. The prize looked near and splendid: the -vengeance might be belated or might not come. Of Pekahiah we are told -absolutely nothing but that he reigned two years, with this -stereotyped addition, that "he did that which was evil in the sight of -Jehovah" by continuing the calf-worship.[373] After this brief and -uneventful reign, his captain Pekah got together fifty fierce -Gileadites, and with the aid of two otherwise unknown friends, Argob -and Arieh, murdered Pekahiah in his own harem.[374] Argob was probably -so named from the district in Bashan, and Arieh was a fit name for a -lion-faced Gadite (1 Chron. xii. 8). - -The sacred historian troubles himself but little about these kings. -His annals of them are brief to extreme meagreness. Like the prophet, -he viewed them as God-abandoned phantoms of guilty royalty. - - "They that cry unto me, My God, we, Israel, know thee. - Israel hath cast off that which is good: - The enemy shall pursue him. - They have set up kings, but not by Me; - They have removed them, and I knew it not: - Of their silver and their gold have they made them idols, - That they may be cut off. - He hath cast on thy calf, O Samaria." - -Probably Pekahiah was, as so often happens, the weak son of a -vigorous father. The times could not tolerate incapable sovereigns; -and the fact that Pekah not only maintained himself on the throne for -twenty years,[375] but was able to take active steps of aggression -against Jerusalem, seems to show that he was a man of some -administrative capacity. If he had not achieved political and military -importance, it would hardly have been worth while for a fierce and -powerful king like Rezin, the last king of Syria, to form so close an -alliance with him. Probably Rezin saw that his throne and his very -existence were in danger, and Pekah wished with Rezin's aid to resist -to the uttermost the encroachments of Assyria, and escape the -burdensome tribute which Menahem had paid. Indeed, it may well be that -Pekahiah's passive continuance of this tribute may have been -distasteful to the people of the land, and that they condoned or even -tacitly aided Pekah's rebellion in order to get rid of it, and to find -protection in an abler monarch. It was the last, perhaps the only, -chance for the kings of Syria and of Israel. As we hear no more of -Hamath as a member of the alliance, we must suppose that it had now -been reduced to impotence and vassalage by the all-powerful Assyrian. -If, however, there was to be any overbalance to the colossal menace -of Nineveh, it could only be by a large confederacy; and it may have -been the refusal of Jotham to join that confederacy, on the death of -his father Uzziah, which caused the joint invasion of Rezin and Pekah -to force him to accept their alliance or to suppress him altogether. -In that case they might have formed a close alliance with Egypt, and -the forces of the united South might, they fancied, prove to be a -match for the forces of the North.[376] - -Whatever designs they may have formed against Jotham, or to whatever -extent they may have annoyed him, it was not till the reign of his son -Ahaz that they became formidable and ruinous. Of this we shall say -more in recounting the reign of Ahaz. All that we need now remark is -that their bold aggression on Judah became the cause of utter -destruction to them both. They advanced against Ahaz, and overran his -helpless country. It was their object to depose the descendant of -David, and to crown in his place a certain unnamed "son of _Tabeal_," -whom Ewald supposed to have been a Syrian, but whose name may possibly -furnish a specimen of the later Jewish device of Gematria.[377] - -It is not impossible that behind these events we may find the efforts -and yearnings of a party which cared more for Israel's unity than for -David's throne. Such a party may easily have sprung up during the -splendid, prosperous reign of Jeroboam II. It has been conjectured by -some that the election of Uzziah by the people--delayed, according to -one reckoning, for twelve years--was in reality the triumph of the party -which felt an unquenchable allegiance to David's house. In Deut. -xxxiii. Reuben is put before Judah; Jeshurun (_i.e._, Israel) is -magnified far more than Judah; and some Northern shrine in Zebulon, as -well as the Temple, is celebrated as a sanctuary.[378] That there were -men in Jerusalem who preferred Rezin and Pekahiah to their own king is -clearly stated in Isaiah. He compares them to those who prefer a turbid -torrent to a soft, sweet stream. "Because," he says, "this people -despise the waters of Shiloah that flow softly, and take delight in -Rezin and Remaliah's son; now, therefore, the Lord bringeth upon them -the waters of the river, strong and many, even the King of Assyria, and -all his glory."[379] Isaiah seems to have had a contempt for the whole -attack. He told Ahaz not to fear for the stumps of those two smoking -firebrands Rezin, King of Syria, and the Israelitish usurper, whom he -only condescends to call "Remaliah's son." He promises the trembling -Ahaz that, since he had faithlessly _refused_ a sign, God would give him -a sign. The sign was that the young woman who accompanied -Isaiah--perhaps his youthful wife--should bear a son, whose name should -be called Immanuel; and that before the child Immanuel--whose -designation, "God with us," was an omen of the loftiest hope--should be -of an age to distinguish evil from good, the Northern land, which Ahaz -abhorred, should be forsaken of both her kings. - -The prophecy came true in every particular. Rezin and Pekah swept all -before them, and besieged Jerusalem; but they wasted their time in -vain before the fortifications which Jotham had strengthened and -repaired. Obliged to raise the siege, Rezin carried his army -southward, and indemnified himself by seizing Elath, by driving out -the Judan garrison, and replacing them with Syrians.[380] It was the -last gleam of Syrian success, before the final overthrow of Damascus -which prophecy had often and emphatically foretold. - -Pekah also withdrew his forces--no doubt compelled to do so by the -step which Ahaz took in his desperation. For now the King of Judah -invoked the protection and invited the active interference of -Tiglath-Pileser against his enemies--"to save him out of the hand of -the King of Syria, and out of the hand of the King of Israel, who were -risen up against him." - -Rezin and Damascus first felt the might of the Assyrian's conquering -arm. The account of his decisive conquest is preserved in the _Eponym -Canon_, and the passages which refer to the defeat of the Syrians will -be found in the First Appendix at the end of the volume. It appears -from the monuments that Rezin (Rasannu) lost not only his kingdom, but -his life. - -It is the death-knell of Araman greatness, as Amos had foretold. - - "Thus saith Jehovah: - For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four, - I will not turn away the punishment thereof; - Because they have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron: - But I will send a fire into the house of Hazael, - Which shall devour the palaces of Benhadad. - And I will break the bar of Damascus,[381] - And cut off him that sitteth [on the throne] in the Valley of - Aven,[382] - And him that holdeth the sceptre from Beth-Eden:[383] - And the people of Syria shall go into captivity unto Kir,[384] - Saith Jehovah." - -Rezin was slain--how we know not; very probably by one of the horrible -methods of torture--by being flayed alive, or decapitated, or having -his lips and nose cut off--which were practised by these demon-kings -of Nineveh. - -Nor did Pekah escape. Tiglath-Pileser advanced against the northern part -of his dominions, and afflicted the land of Zebulon and Naphtali. Ijon; -Abel-beth-Maachah, the city of Elisha; Zanoah, the ancient sanctuary of -Kedesh-Naphtali, the home of the hero Barak; Hazor, the former capital -of the Canaanitish king Jabin; Gilead; Galilee,--all submitted to him, -apparently without striking a serious blow. He dealt with the miserable -inhabitants in the way familiar to kings of Assyria. He deported them -_en masse_ into a strange country of which they did not understand the -language, and in which they were reduced to hopeless subjection, while -he supplied their places by aliens from various parts of his own -dominions. There could be no securer method of reducing to paralysis all -their national aspirations. Strangers in a strange land, they forgot -their nationality, forgot their religion, forgot their language, forgot -their traditions. Their sole resource was to plunge into material -pursuits, and to melt away into indistinguishable obliteration among -the neighbouring heathen. It was the beginning of the Northern -Captivity--of the loss of the Ten Tribes. - -As Tiglath-Pileser thus permanently subdued and depopulated the land -of the Northern Tribes, it is a Jewish tradition that at this time he -carried away the golden "calf" from Dan among his spoils.[385] -Scripture does not record the fact, though in Hosea (viii. 5) there -may be an allusion to the fate of that at Bethel, whether the right -version be "He hath cast off thy calf, O Samaria," or "Thy calf, O -Samaria, hath cast thee off."[386] "The workman made it," he -continues; "therefore it is not God: for the calf of Samaria shall be -broken in pieces." And again (x. 5): "The people of Samaria shall fear -because of the heifer of the House of Vanity: for the people thereof -shall mourn over it, and the _chemarim_ [_i.e._, the black-robed false -priests thereof] shall tremble for it, for the glory thereof, because -it is departed. It [the idol] shall also be carried to Assyria for a -present to King Combat." - -For a time Pekah escaped; but unsuccess is fatal to a murderous usurper, -weakened by the loss and plunder of dominions which he is unable to -defend. Instead of wasting time in the siege of a strong city like -Samaria, Tiglath-Pileser in all probability stirred up Hoshea, the son -of Elah, to rise in conspiracy against his master and slay him. For -Pekah and Israel seem to have made light of the Northern raid. They said -in their pride and stoutness of heart, "The bricks are fallen down, but -we will build with new stones: the sycomores are cut down, but we will -change them into cedars." Such pretence of security was ill-timed and -senseless, and Isaiah denounced it. "Therefore," he said, "Jehovah hath -set up against Israel the adversaries of Rezin [_i.e._, the Assyrians], -and hath stirred up his enemies; the Syrians on the east, and the -Philistines on the west; and they have devoured Israel with open mouth. -For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out -still. Yet the people have not turned unto Him that smote them, neither -have they sought the Lord of hosts. Therefore Jehovah hath cut off from -Israel palm-branch and rush in one day. The elder and the honourable -man, he is the head; and the prophet that speaketh lies, he is the tail. -For they that lead this people cause them to err, and they that are led -of them are swallowed up."[387] - -The following verses furnish one of the numerous pictures of the anarchy -and abounding misery of these evil days. "For wickedness burneth as the -fire: it devoureth the briers and thorns; yea, it kindleth in the -thickets of the forest, and they roll upwards in thick clouds of smoke. -Through the wrath of the Lord of hosts is the land burnt up; the people -also are the fuel of fire: _no man spareth his brother_. And one shall -snatch on the right, and be hungry; and he shall eat on the left hand, -and they shall not be satisfied: they shall _eat every man the flesh of -his own arm_: Manasseh, Ephraim; and Ephraim, Manasseh: and they -together shall be against Judah. For all this His anger is not turned -away, but His hand is stretched out still." - -We are told in the Book of Kings that Pekah reigned for twenty years; -but some of these later reigns must be shortened to suit the -exigencies of known chronological data. It seems probable that he -occupied the throne for a much shorter time.[388] - -Such was the weakened, harassed, vassal kingdom--the gaunt spectre of -itself--to the throne of which, after a period of anarchy and chaos, -Hoshea, by conspiracy and murder, succeeded as the miserable feudatory -of Assyria. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[354] Amos viii. 2. - -[355] Amos iv. 1-3. - -[356] It is probable that our present Book of Zechariah is composed of -the works of three prophets of different dates, each of whom may have -borne that name. See my _Minor Prophets_ ("Men of the Bible" Series). - -[357] Zech. xi. 8. In 2 Kings xv. 10 the LXX. read [Greek: kai -epataxen auton en keblaam]; and Ewald thinks that "before the people" -([Hebrew: kavol-tzam]) is really a proper name of the third king in -one month--"and _Kobolam_ slew him." There is insufficient ground for -this; though a similar name is found in Assyrian records. - -[358] Hos. viii. 3, vii. 7. - -[359] Zachariah, Shallum, Kobolam (?). - -[360] Zech. xi. 1-17 (Heb. 13). - -[361] That this was Thapsacus on the Euphrates (1 Kings iv. 24), and -that Menahem was in a position to march northward three hundred miles, -and offer so deadly and wanton an insult to the might of Assyria, is -out of the question. The name means "a ford," and might apply to any -town on a river. Thenius thinks the name is a clerical error for -_Tappuach_, between Ephraim and Manasseh (Josh. xvii. 7, 8). - -[362] Josephus says, [Greek: mottos hyperboln ou katalipn oude -agriottos]. It is said that the same crime was committed in 1861 by a -Mexican bandit. Machiavelli says, "He who violently and without just -right usurps a crown must use cruelty, if cruelty becomes necessary, -once for all" (_De princ._, 8). - -[363] 2 Kings viii. 12; Hos. xiii. 16. - -[364] Amos i. 13. - -[365] Hos. x. 14. This allusion is, however, uncertain. Shalmaneser III. -is not elsewhere found abbreviated into Shalman. Some suppose him to be -a Moabitish king, Salamannu, who was a vassal of Tiglath-Pileser. The -LXX., Vulg., etc., identify him with the Zalmunna of Judg. viii. 18. -Psalm lxxxiii. 11 renders the word _ex domo ejus qui judicavit Baal_ -(_i.e._, Gideon). Beth-Arbel is either Arbela in Galilee, or Irbid, -north-east of Pella. - -[366] Nah. iii. 10. - -[367] Isa. xiii. 16. - -[368] The two predecessors of Tiglath-Pileser (_Tuklat-abal-isarra_) -were Assurdayan and Assurnirari. - -[369] Isa. v. 26-29. - -[370] Comp. Job xx. 15; Ruth ii. 1. - -[371] Hos. v. 11-13. Comp. x. 6: "It [Samaria] shall be carried to -Assyria for a present unto King Jareb." Sayce (_Bab. and Orient. -Records_, December 1887) thinks that Jareb may have been the original -name of Sargon, and so too Neubauer, _Zeitschr. fr Assyr._, 1886. The -Vulg. renders King Jareb _ad regem ultorem_, and so too Symmachus. -Aquila and Theodotion have [Greek: dikazomenon]. It may be the name of -an unknown king of Assyria, or of Pul, or of Sargon--R.V., margin, "a -king that should contend." - -[372] Hos. vii. 8-12. - -[373] Josephus says, [Greek: t tou patros akolouthsas motti]. - -[374] 2 Kings xv. 25, A.V., "in the palace of the king's house" -(_armon_), rather "fortress." For the character of the Gileadites see -1 Chron. xii. 8, xxvi. 31. - -[375] The length of Pekah's reign is most doubtful. If the periods -assigned to the reigns in the Northern and Southern Kingdoms be added -together up to the Fall of Samaria in the sixth year of Hezekiah (2 -Kings xviii. 9, 10), it will be found that the Southern chronology is -twenty years longer than the Northern. G. Smith would alter the text, -and make Jeroboam II. reign fifty-one years and Pekah thirty years; -others invent an interregnum of eleven years between Jeroboam II. and -Zachariah, and an anarchy of nine years before Hoshea's accession; -others shorten Pekah's reign to _one_ year. - -[376] 2 Kings xv. 37. - -[377] Vide _infra_. - -[378] Deut. xxxiii. 19: "They [Zebulon] shall call the peoples unto -the mountain: there shall they offer the sacrifices of righteousness." - -[379] Isa. viii. 6, 7. - -[380] Perhaps we should read Edomites (2 Kings xvi. 6). - -[381] The bar of its city gate. - -[382] Bikath-Aven--"The cleft of Aven"--Coele Syria, or Hollow Syria, -still called by the Arabs El-Bukaa. Comp. Josh. xi. 17, xii. 7. Aven--or -"Vanity"--is perhaps Heliopolis or Baalbek. Comp. Ezek. xxx. 17. - -[383] Perhaps Beit el Jame, "House of Paradise"--about eight hours -from Damascus (Porter, _Five Years in Syria_, i. 313). - -[384] Kir, in Armenia--the land of their origin (Amos ix. 7). - -[385] But, after all, was there a golden calf at Dan? It is scarcely -ever alluded to, and the notion that there was one may have arisen (1) -from a corruption or mistaken rendering of the text in 1 Kings xii. -29, and (2) from the existence there of the idolatrous ephod. See -Klostermann, _ad loc._; Isa. ix. 8-17. - -[386] LXX., [Greek: Apotripsai ton moschon sou, Samareia]; Vulg., -_Projectus est vitulus tuus, Samaria_. Orelli renders it, "Abscheulich -ist dein Kalb, O Samaria." In Jer. xlvi. 15 we read (of Egypt), "Why is -thy strong one swept away?" where the true reading may be, "Hath Khaph -[_i.e._, Apis], thy chosen one, fled?" LXX., [Greek: Apis ho moschos -sou, ho eklektos]. So Amos had prophesied that the "god of Dan" and the -"way of Beersheba" should fall for evermore (Amos viii. 14). - -[387] Isa. ix. 11-16. With this passage comp. 2 Kings xxiii. 5; Zeph. -i. 4; Hos. vii. 9, 10. - -[388] Tiglath-Pileser says: "Pakaha, their king, I killed: Ausi -[Hoshea] I placed over them. The distant land of Bit-Khumri [the -"house of Omri"]--_the whole of its inhabitants_, with their goods--I -carried away to Asshur" (B.C. 734). In this year he mentions Ahaz -among his tributaries. - - - - - CHAPTER XXI - - _HOSHEA, AND THE FALL OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM_ - - B.C. 734-725 - - 2 KINGS xvii. 1-41 - - "As for Samaria, her king is cut off as the foam upon the - water."--HOS. x. 7. - - -As a matter of convenience, we follow our English Bible in calling the -prophet by the name Ho_sea_, and the nineteenth, last, and best king of -Israel Ho_shea_. The names, however, are identical ([Hebrew: -hovoshetza]), and mean "Salvation"--the name borne by Joshua also in his -earlier days. In the irony of history the name of the last king of -Ephraim was thus identical with that of her earliest and greatest hero, -just as the last of Roman emperors bore the double name of the Founder -of Rome and the Founder of the Empire--Romulus Augustulus. By a yet -deeper irony of events the king in whose reign came the final -precipitation of ruin wore the name which signified deliverance from it. - -And more and more, as time went on, the prophet Hosea felt that he had -no word of present hope or comfort for the king his namesake. It was -the more brilliant lot of Isaiah, in the Southern Kingdom, to kindle -the ardour of a generous courage. Like Tyrtus, who roused the -Spartans to feel their own greatness--like Demosthenes, who hurled -the might of Athens against Philip of Macedon--like Chatham, "bidding -England be of good cheer, and hurl defiance at her foes"--like Pitt, -pouring forth, in the days of the Napoleonic terror, "the indomitable -language of courage and of hope,"--Isaiah was missioned to encourage -Judah to despise first the mighty Syrian, and then the mightier -Assyrian. Far different was the lot of Hosea, who could only be the -denouncer of an inevitable doom. His sad function was like that of -Phocion after Chroneia, of Hannibal after Zama, of Thiers after -Sedan: he had to utter the Cassandra-voices of prophecy, which his -besotted and demented contemporaries--among whom the priests were the -worst of all[389]--despised and flouted until the time for repentance -had gone by for ever. - -True it is that Hosea could not be content--what true heart could?--to -breathe nothing but the language of reprobation and despair. Israel -had been "yoked to his two transgressions,"[390] but Jehovah could not -give up His love for His chosen people:-- - - "How shall I give thee up, Ephraim? - How shall I surrender thee, Israel? - How shall I make thee as Admah? - How shall I treat thee as Zeboim? - Mine heart is turned within Me; - I am wholly filled with compassion! - I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger; - I will not again destroy Ephraim: - For I am God, and not man. - The Holy One in the midst of thee! - I will not come to exterminate! - They shall come after Jehovah as after a lion that roars! - For he shall roar, and his sons shall come hurrying from the - west, - They shall come hurrying as a bird out of Egypt, - And as a dove out of the land of Assyria; - And I will cause them to dwell in their houses, Saith - Jehovah."[391] - -Alas! the gleam of alleviation was imaginary rather than actual. The -prophet's wish was father to his thought. He had prophesied that -Israel should be scattered in all lands (ix. 3, 12, 17, xiii. 3-16). -This was true; and it did not prove true, except in some higher ideal -sense, that "Israel shall again dwell in his own land" (xiv. 4-7) in -prosperity and joy. - -The date of Hoshea's accession is uncertain, and we cannot tell in -what sense we are to understand his reign as having lasted "nine -years."[392] We have no grounds for accepting the statement of -Josephus (_Antt._, IX. xiii. 1), that Hoshea had been a friend of -Pekah and plotted against him. Tiglath-Pileser expressly says that he -himself slew Pekah and appointed Hoshea.[393] His must have been, at -the best, a pitiful and humiliating reign. He owed his purely vassal -sovereignty to Assyrian patronage. He probably did as well for Israel -as was in his power. Singular to relate, he is the only one of all the -kings of Israel of whom the historian has a word of commendation; for -while we are told that "he did that which was evil in the sight of -the Lord," it is added that it was "not as the kings of Israel that -were before him." But we do not know wherein either his evil-doing or -his superiority consisted. The Rabbis guess that he did not replace -the golden calf at Dan which Tiglath-Pileser had taken away (Hos. x. -6); or that he did not prevent his subjects from going to Hezekiah's -passover.[394] "It seems like a harsh jest," says Ewald, "that this -Hoshea, who was better than all his predecessors, was to be the last -king." But so it has often been in history. The vengeance of the -French Revolution smote the innocent and harmless Louis XVI. and Marie -Antoinette--not Louis XIV., or Louis XV. and Madame du Pompadour. - -His patron Tiglath-Pileser ended his magnificent reign of conquest in -727, soon after he had seated Hoshea on the throne. The removal of his -strong grasp on the helm caused immediate revolt. Phoenicia especially -asserted her independence against Shalmaneser IV. He seems to have -spent five years in an unavailing attempt to capture Island-Tyre. -Meanwhile, the internal troubles which had harassed and weakened Egypt -ceased, and a strong Ethiopian king named Sabaco established his rule -over the whole country.[395] It was perhaps the hope that Phoenicia -might hold out against the Assyrian, and that the Egyptian might -protect Samaria, which kindled in the mind of Hoshea the delusive plan -of freeing himself and his impoverished land from the grinding tribute -imposed by Nineveh. While Shalmaneser[396] was trying to quell Tyre, -Hoshea, having received promises of assistance from Sabaco, withheld -the "presents"--the _minchah_, as the tribute is euphemistically -called--which he had hitherto paid. Seeing the danger of a powerful -coalition, Shalmaneser swept down on Samaria in 724. Possibly he -defeated the army of Israel in the plain of Jezreel (Hos. i. 5), and -got hold of the person of Hoshea. Josephus says that he "besieged -him"; but the sacred historian only tells us that "he shut him up, and -bound him in prison." Whether Hoshea was taken in battle, or betrayed -by the Assyrian party in Samaria, or whether he went in person to see -if he could pacify the ruthless conqueror, he henceforth disappears -from history "like foam"--or like a chip or a bubble--"upon the -water." We do not know whether he was put to death, but we infer from -an allusion in Micah that he was subjected to the cruel indignities in -which the Assyrians delighted; for the prophet says, "They shall smite -the Judge of Israel with a rod upon the cheek."[397] Perhaps in the -title "Judge" (Shophet, _suffes_) we may see a sign that Hoshea's -royalty was little more than the shadow of a name. - -Having thus got rid of the king, Shalmaneser proceeded to invest the -capital. But Samaria was strongly fortified upon its hill, and the -Jewish race has again and again shown--as it showed so conspicuously -in the final crisis of its destiny, when Jerusalem defied the terrible -armies of Rome--that with walls to protect them they could pluck up a -terrible courage and endurance from despair. Strong as Assyria was, -the capital of Ephraim for three years resisted her beleaguering host -and her crashing battering-rams. About all the anguish which prevailed -within the city, and the wild vicissitudes of orgy and starvation, -history is silent. But prophecy tells us that the sorrows of a -travailing woman came upon the now kingless city. They drank to the -dregs the cup of fury.[398] The saddest Northern prophet, "the -Jeremiah of Israel," sings the dirge of Israel's saddest king.[399] - - "I am become to them as a lion; - As a leopard will I watch by the way; - I will meet them as a bear bereaved of her whelps, - And rend the caul of their heart, - And there will I devour them like a lioness: - The beast of the field shall tear them.... - Where now is thy king, that he may save thee in all thy cities - And thy judges, of whom thou saidst, 'Give me a king and - prince'? - I give thee a king in Mine anger, - And take him away in My wrath." - -For three years Samaria held out. During the siege Shalmaneser died, -and was succeeded by Sargon, who--though he vaguely talks of "the -kings his ancestors," and says that he had been preceded by three -hundred and thirty Assyrian dynasts--never names his father, and seems -to have been a usurping general.[400] - -Sabaco remained inactive, and basely deserted the miserable people -which had relied on his protection. In this conduct Egypt was true to -its historic character of untrustworthiness and inertness. Both in -Israel and in Judah there were two political parties. One relied on -the strength of Egypt; the other counselled submission to Assyria, -or--in the hour when it became necessary to defy Assyria--confidence -in God. Egypt was as frail a support as one of her own paper-reeds, -which bent under the weight, and broke and ran into the hand of every -one who leaned on it. - -Sargon did not raze the city, and we see from the _Eponym Canon_ that -its inhabitants were still strong enough some years later to take part -in a futile revolt. But we have one dreadful glimpse of the horrors -which he inflicted upon it. They were the inevitable punishment of -every conquered city which had dared to resist the Assyrian arm. - - "Samaria shall bear her guilt, - For she hath rebelled against her God. - They shall fall by the sword: - Their infants shall be dashed in pieces, - And their women in child shall be ripped up."[401] - -Sargon's own record of the matter on the tablets at Khorsabad is: "I -besieged, took, and occupied the city of Samaria, and carried into -captivity twenty-seven thousand two hundred and eighty of its -inhabitants. I changed the former government of this country, and -placed over it lieutenants of my own. And Sebeh, Sultan of Egypt, came -to Raphia to fight against me. They met me, and I routed them. Sebeh -fled."[402] The Assyrians were occupied in the unsuccessful siege of -Tyre between 720-715, during which years Sargon put down Yahubid of -Hamath, whose revolt had been aided by Damascus and Samaria. In 710 he -marched against Ashdod (Isa. xx. 1). In 709 he defeated -Merodach-Baladan at Dur-Yakin, and reconquered Chalda, deporting some -of the population into Samaria. In 704, in the fifteenth year of his -reign, he was assassinated, after a career of victory. He inscribes on -his palace at Khorsabad a prayer to his god Assur, that, after his -toils and conquests, "I may be preserved for the long years of a long -life, for the happiness of my body, for the satisfaction of my heart. -May I accumulate in this palace immense treasures, the booties of all -countries, the products of mountains and valleys." Assur and the gods -of Chalda were invoked in vain; the prayer was scattered to the -winds, and the murderer's dagger was the comment on Sargon's happy -anticipations of peace and splendour. - -Israel fell unpitied by her southern neighbour, for Judah was still -smarting under memories of the old contempt and injury of Joash -ben-Jehoahaz, and the more recent wrongs inflicted by Pekah and Rezin. -Isaiah exults over the fate of Samaria, while he points the moral of her -fall to the drunken priests and prophets of Jerusalem. "Woe," he says, -"to the crown of pride of the drunkards of Ephraim, and to the fading -flower of his glorious beauty, which is on the head of the fat valley of -them that are smitten down with wine! Behold, the Lord hath a mighty and -strong one [_i.e._, the Assyrian]; as a tempest of hail, a destroying -storm, as a tempest of mighty water overflowing, shall he cast down to -the earth with violence. The crown of pride, the drunkards of Ephraim, -shall be trodden underfoot: and the fading flower of his glorious -beauty, which is on the head of the fat valley, shall be as the first -ripe fig before the summer; which when he that looketh upon it seeth, -while it is yet in his hand he eateth it up."[403] Israel had begun in -hostility to Judah, and perished by it at last. - -Such, then, was the end of the once brilliant kingdom of Israel--the -kingdom which, even so late as the reign of Jeroboam II., seemed to -have a great future before it. No one could have foreseen beforehand -that, when, with the prophetic encouragement of Ahijah, Jeroboam I. -established his sovereignty over the greater, richer, and more -flourishing part of the land assigned to the sons of Jacob, the new -kingdom should fall into utter ruin and destruction after only two and -a half centuries of existence, and its tribes melt away amid the -surrounding nations, and sink into a mixed and semi-heathen race -without any further nationality or distinctive history. It seemed far -less probable that the mere fragment of the Southern Kingdom, after -retaining its separate existence for more than one hundred and sixty -years longer than its more powerful brother, should continue to endure -as a nation till the end of time. Such was the design of God's -providence, and we know no more. The Northern Kingdom had, up to this -time, produced the greatest and most numerous prophets--Ahijah, -Elijah, Elisha, Micaiah, Jonah, Amos, Hosea, Nahum, and many -more.[404] It had also produced the loveliest and most enduring poetry -in the Song of Songs, the Song of Deborah, and other contributions to -the Books of Jashar, and of the Wars of Jehovah. It had also brought -into vigour the earliest and best historic literature, the narratives -of the Elohist and the Jehovist. These immortal legacies of the -religious spirit of the Northern Kingdom were incomparably superior in -moral and enduring value to the Levitic jejuneness of the Priestly -Code, with its hierarchic interests and ineffectual rules, which, in -the exaggerated supremacy attached to rites, proved to be the final -blight of an unspiritual Judaism. Israel had also been superior in -prowess and in deeds of war, and in the days of Joash ben-Jehoahaz -ben-Jehu had barely conceded to Judah a right to separate existence. -More than all this, the apostasies of Judah, from the days of Solomon -downwards, were quite as heinous as Jezebel's Baal-worship, and far -more deadly than the irregular but not at first idolatrous cultus of -Bethel. The prophets are careful to teach Judah that if she was -spared it was not because of any good deservings.[405] Yet now the -cedar was scathed and smitten down, and its boughs were rent and -scattered; and the thistle had escaped the wild beast's tread! - -In the former volume we glanced at some of the causes of this, and the -blessings which resulted from it. The central and chiefest blessing -was, first, the preservation of a purer form of monotheism, and a -loftier ideal of religion--though only realised by a few in -Judah--than had ever prevailed in the Northern Tribes; secondly, and -above all, the development of that inspiring Messianic prophecy which -was to be fulfilled seven centuries later, when He who was David's Son -and David's Lord came to our lost race from the bosom of the Father, -and brought life and immortality to light. - -And it was the work purely of "God's unseen providence, by men nicknamed -'Chance,'" which, dealing with nations as the potter with his clay, -chooses some to honour and some to dishonour. For, as all the prophets -are anxious to remind the Judan Kingdom, their success, the -procrastination of their downfall, their restoration from captivity, -were not due to any merits of their own. The Jews were and ever had been -a stiff-necked nation; and though some of their kings had been faithful -servants of Jehovah, yet many of them--like Rehoboam, and Ahaz, and -Manasseh--exceeded in wickedness and inexcusable apostasy the least -faithful of the worshippers at Gilgal and Bethel. They were plainly -reminded of their nothingness: "And thou shalt speak and say before the -Lord thy God, A Syrian ready to perish was my father, and he went down -into Egypt, and sojourned there with a few, and became there a -nation."[406] "Fear not, thou worm Jacob: I will help thee."[407] - -But this was the end of the Ten Tribes. Nor must we say that Hosea's -prediction of mercy was laughed to scorn by the irony of events, when -he had given it as God's promise that-- - - "I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger, - I will not again destroy Israel; - For I am God, and not man."[408] - -The words mean that mercy is God's chiefest and most essential -attribute; and, after all, a nation is composed of families and -individuals, and in political extinction there may have been many -families and individuals in Israel, like that of Tobias, and like that -of Anna, the prophetess of the tribe of Asher, who found, either in -their far exile, or among the scattered Jews who still peopled the old -territories, a peace which was impossible during the distracted -anarchy and deepening corruption of the whole period which had elapsed -since the founding of the house of Omri. In any case God knows and -loves His own. The words, - - "I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger; - For I am God, and not man," - -might stand for an epitome of much that is most precious in Holy Writ. -God's orthodoxy is the truth; and the truth remaineth, though man's -orthodoxy exercises all its fury and all its baseness to overwhelm it. -What hope has any man, even a St. Paul--what hope had even the Lord -Himself--before the harsh, self-interested tribunals of human -judgment, or of that purely external religionism which has always -shown itself more brutal and more blundering than secular cruelty? -What chance has there been, humanly speaking, for God's best saints, -prophets, and reformers, when priests, popes, or inquisitors have been -their judges? If God resembled those generations of unresisted -ecclesiastics, whose chief resort has been the syllogism of violence, -and whose main arguments have been the torture-chamber and the stake, -what hope could there possibly be for the vast majority of mankind but -those endless torments by the terrors of which corrupt Churches have -forced their tyranny upon the crushed liberties and the paralysed -conscience of mankind? The Indian sage was right who said that "God -can only be truly described by the words No! No!"--that is, by -repudiating multitudes of the ignoble and cruel basenesses which -religious teachers have imagined or invented respecting Him. Because -God is God, and not man--God, not a tyrant or an inquisitor--God, with -the great compassionate heart of unfathomable tenderness,--therefore, -in all who truly love Him, perfect love casteth out fear, because fear -hath torment. Sin means ruin; yet God is love.[409] - - * * * * * - -The historian of the Kings here digresses, in a manner unusual to the -Old Testament, to give us a most interesting glimpse of the fate of -the conquered people, and the origin of the race which was known to -after-ages by the name "Samaritan." - -Sargon, when he had sacked the capital, carried out the policy of -deportation which had now been established by the Assyrian kings. He -achieved the double purpose of populating the capital and province of -Nineveh, while he reduced subject nations to inanition, by sweeping -away all the chief of the inhabitants from conquered states, and -settling them in his own more immediate dominions. There they would be -reduced to impotence, and mingle with the races among whom their lot -would henceforth be cast. He therefore "carried Israel away" into -Assyria, and placed them in Halah, north of Thapsacus, on the -Euphrates, and in Habor, the river of Gozan[410]--_i.e._, on the river -in Northern Assyria which still bears the name of Khabour, and flows -into the Euphrates--and in the cities of the Medes.[411] He replaced -the old population by Dinaites, Tarplites, Apharsathchites, -Susanchites, Elamites, Dehavites, and Babylonians, after carrying away -the great bulk of the better-class population.[412] - -After this the historian pauses to sum up and emphasise once more the -main lesson of his narrative. It is that "righteousness exalteth a -nation, and sin is the reproach of any people." God had called His son -Israel out of Egypt, delivered His chosen from Pharaoh, given them a -pleasant land; but "Israel had sinned against Jehovah their God, and -had feared other gods, and walked in the statutes of the heathen." -They had failed therefore in fulfilling the very purpose for which -they had been set apart. They had been intended "to uplift among the -nations the banner of righteousness" and the banner of the One True -God. Instead of this, they were seduced by the heathen ritual of - - "Gay religions full of pomp and gold." - -They decked out alien institutions,[413] and alike in frequented and -populous places--"from the tower of the watchmen to the fenced -city"--set up _matstseboth_ (A.V., "pillars") and _Asherim_ on every -high hill. The green trees became _obumbratrices scelerum_, the secret -bowers of their iniquities. They burnt incense on the _bamoth_, and -served idols, and wrought wickedness. Useless had been the voices of -all the prophets and the seers. They went after vain things, and -became vain. Beginning with the two "calves," they proceeded to lewd -and orgiastic idolatries. Ahab and Jezebel seduced them into Tyrian -Baal-worship. From the Assyrians they learnt and practised the -adoration of the host of heaven.[414] From Moab and Ammon they -borrowed the abominable rites of Moloch, and used divination and -enchantments by means of belomancy (Ezek. xxi. 21, 22) and necromancy, -and sold themselves to do wickedness. - -Nor was this all. These idolatries, with their guilty ritualism, were -not confined to Israel, but also - - "Infected Zion's daughters with like heat, - Whose wanton passions in the sacred porch - Ezekiel saw, when, by the vision led, - His eye surveyed the dark idolatries - Of alienated Judah." - -And thus, when Jehovah afflicted the seed of Israel and cast them out -of His sight, Judah also had to feel the stroke of retribution.[415] - -And it is idle to object that even if Israel had been faithful she must -have inevitably perished before the superior might of Damascus, or -Nineveh, or Babylon. How can we tell? It is not possible for us thus to -write unwritten history, and there is absolutely nothing to show that -the surmise is correct. In the days of David, of Uzziah, of Jeroboam -II., Judah and Israel had shown what they could achieve. Had they been -strong in faithfulness to Jehovah, and in the righteousness which that -faith required, they would have shown an invincible strength amid the -moral enervation of the surrounding people. They might have held their -own by welding into one strong kingdom the whole of Palestine, including -Philistia, Phoenicia, the Negeb, and the Trans-Jordanic region. They -might have consolidated the sway which they at various times attained -southwards, as far as the Red Sea port of Elath; northwards over Aram -and Damascus, as far as the Hamath on the Orontes; eastwards to -Thapsacus on the Euphrates; westward to the Isles of the Gentiles. -There is nothing improbable, still less impossible, in the view that, if -the Israelites had truly served Jehovah and obeyed His laws, they might -then have permanently established the monarchy which was ideally -regarded as their inheritance, and which for brief and fitful periods -they partially maintained. And such a monarchy, held together by warrior -statesmen, strong and righteous, and above all secure in the blessing of -God, would have been a thoroughly adequate counterpoise, not only to -dilatory and distracted Egypt, which had long ceased to be aggressive, -but even to brutal Assyria, which prevailed in no small measure because -of the isolation and mutual dissension of these southern principalities. - -But, as it was, "Assyria and Egypt--the two world-powers in the dawn -of history, the two chief sources of ancient civilisation, the twin -giant-empires which bounded the Israelite people on the right hand and -on the left--were cruel neighbours, between whom the ill-fated nation -was tossed to and fro in wanton sport like a shuttlecock. They were -cruel friends before whom it must cringe in turns, praying sometimes -for help, suing sometimes for very life--alternate scourges in the -hand of the Divine wrath. Now it is the fly of Egypt, and now it is -the bee of Assyria, whose ruthless swarms issue forth at the word of -Jehovah, settling in the holes of the rocks, and upon all thorns, and -upon all bushes, with deadly sting, fatal to man and beast, -devastating the land far and wide. Holding the poor Israelite in their -relentless embrace, they threatened ever and again to crush him by -their grip. Like the fabled rocks which frowned over the narrow -straits of the Bosporus, they would crash together and annihilate the -helpless craft which the storms of destiny had placed at their mercy. -Israel reeled under their successive blows. As was the beginning, so -was the end. As the captivity of Egypt had been the cradle of the -nation, so was the captivity of Assyria to be its tomb."[416] - -In any case the principle of the historian remains unshaken. Sin is -weakness; idolatry is folly and rebellion; uncleanness is decrepitude. -St. Paul was not thinking of this ancient Philosophy of History when -he wrote his Epistle to the Romans; yet the intense and masterly -sketch which he gives of that moral corruption which brought about the -long, slow, agonising dissolution of the beauty that was Greece, and -the grandeur that was Rome, is one of its strongest justifications. -His view only differs from the summary before us in the power of its -eloquence and the profoundness of its psychologic insight. He says the -same thing as the historian of the Kings, only in words of greater -power and wider reach, when he writes: "For the wrath of God is -revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of -men, who hold down the truth in unrighteousness. Knowing God, they -glorified Him not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in -their reasonings" ([Greek: emataithsan], the very word used in the -LXX. in 2 Kings xvii. 15), "and their senseless heart was darkened. -Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools" (words which -might describe the expediency-policy of Jeroboam I., and its fatal -consequences), "and changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the -likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four-footed -beasts, and creeping things. For this cause God gave them up to -passions of dishonour, and unto a reprobate mind, to do those things -which are not fitting, being filled with all unrighteousness, -wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, strife, -deceit, malignity,"--and so on, through a long catalogue of iniquities -which are identical with those which we find so burningly denounced on -the pages of the prophets of Israel and Judah. - -Even a Machiavelli, cool and cynical and audacious as was his -scepticism, could see and admit that faithfulness to religion is the -secret of the happiness and prosperity of states.[417] An irreligious -society tends inevitably and always to be a dissolute society; and a -"dissolute society is the most tragic spectacle which history has ever -to present--a nest of disease, of jealousy, of dissensions, of ruin, -and despair, whose last hope is to be washed off the world and -disappear. Such societies must die sooner or later of their own -gangrene, of their own corruption, because the infection of evil, -spreading into unbounded selfishness, ever intensifying and -reproducing passions which defeat their own aim, can never end in -anything but moral dissolution." We need not look further than the -collapse of France after the battle of Sedan, and the cause to which -that collapse was attributed, not only by Christians, but by her own -most worldly and sceptical writers, to see that the same causes ever -issue and will issue in the same ruinous effects. - - * * * * * - -In order to complete the history of the Northern Kingdom, the -historian here anticipates the order of time by telling us what -happened to the mongrel population whom Sargon transplanted into -central Ephraim in place of the old inhabitants. - -The king, we are told, brought them from Babylon--which was at this -time under the rule of Assyria; from Cuthah--by which seems to be -meant some part of Mesopotamia near Babylon;[418] from Avva, or -Ivah--probably the same as Ahavah or Hit, on the Euphrates, north-west -of Babylon; from Sepharvaim, or Sippara, also on the Euphrates;[419] -and from Hamath, on the Orontes, which had not long remained under -Jeroboam II.[420] It must not be supposed that the whole population of -Ephraim was deported; that was a physical impossibility. Although we -are told in Assyrian annals that Sargon carried away with him so vast -a number of captives, it is, of course, clear that the lowest and -poorest part of the population was left.[421] We can imagine the wild -confusion which arose when they found themselves compelled to share -the dismantled palaces and abandoned estates of the wealthy with the -horde of new colonists, whose language, in all probability, they but -imperfectly understood. There must have been many a tumult, many a -scene of horror, such as took place in the long antagonism of Normans -and Saxons in England, before the immigrants and the relics of the -former populace settled down to amalgamation and mutual tolerance. - -Sargon is said to have carried away with him the golden calf or calves -of Bethel, as Tiglath-Pileser is said by the Rabbis to have carried away -that of Dan.[422] He also took away with him all the educated classes, -and all the teachers of religion.[423] No one was left to instruct the -ignorant inhabitants; and, as Hosea had prophesied, there was neither a -sacrifice, nor a pillar, nor an ephod, and not even teraphim to which -they could resort.[424] Naturally enough, the disunited dregs of an old -and of a new population had no clear knowledge of religion. They "feared -not Jehovah." The sparseness of inhabitants, with its consequent neglect -of agriculture, caused the increase of wild beasts among them. There had -always been lions and bears in "the swellings of Jordan,"[425] and in -all the lonelier parts of the land; and to this day there are leopards -in the woods of Carmel, and hynas and jackals in many regions. -Conscious of their miserable and godless condition, and afflicted by the -lions, which they regarded as a sign of Jehovah's anger, the Ephraimites -sent a message to the King of Assyria. They only claimed Jehovah as -their local god, and complained that the new colonists had provoked the -wrath of "the God of the land" by not knowing His "manner"--that is, -the way in which He should be worshipped. The consequence was that they -were in danger of being exterminated by lions. The kings of Assyria were -devoted worshippers of Assur and Merodach, but they held the common -belief of ancient polytheists that each country had its own potent -divinities. Sargon, therefore, gave orders that one of the priests of -his captivity should be sent back to Samaria, "to teach them the manner -of the god of the land." The priest selected for the purpose returned, -took up his residence at the old shrine of Bethel, and "taught them how -they should fear Jehovah." His success was, however, extremely limited, -except among the former followers of Jeroboam's dishonoured cult. The -old religious shrines still continued, and the immigrants used them for -the glorification of their former deities. Samaria, therefore, witnessed -the establishment of a singularly hybrid form of religionism. The -Babylonians worshipped Succoth-Benoth,[426] perhaps Zirbanit, wife of -Merodach or Bel; the Cuthites worshipped Nergal, the Assyrian war-god, -the lion-god;[427] the Hittites, from Hamath, worshipped Ashima or -Esmn, the god of air and thunder, under the form of a goat;[428] the -Avites preferred Nibhaz and Tartak, perhaps Saturn--unless these names -be Jewish jeers, implying that one of these deities had the head of a -dog, and the other of an ass.[429] More dreadful, if less ridiculous, -was the worship of the Sepharvites, who adored Adrammelech and -Anammelech, the sun-god under male and female forms, to whom, as to -Moloch, they burnt their children in the fire. As for ministers, "they -made unto them priests from among themselves,[430] who offered -sacrifices for them in the shrines of the bamoth." Thus the whole -mongrel population "feared the Lord, and served their own gods," as they -continued to do in the days of the annalist whose record the historian -quotes. He ends his interesting sketch with the words, that, in spite of -the Divine teaching, "these nations"--so he calls them, and so -completely does he refuse to them the dignity of being Israel's -children--feared the Lord, and served their graven images, their -children likewise, and their children's children,--"as did their -fathers, so do they unto this day."[431] - -The "unto this day" refers, no doubt, to the document from which the -historian of the Kings was quoting--perhaps about B.C. 560, in the -third generation after the fall of Samaria. A very brief glance will -suffice to indicate the future history of the Samaritans. We hear but -little of them between the present reference and the days of Ezra and -Nehemiah. By that time they had purged themselves of these grosser -idolatries, and held themselves fit in all respects to co-operate -with the returned exiles in the work of building the Temple. Such was -not the opinion of the Jews. Ezra regarded them as "the adversaries of -Judah and Israel."[432] The exiles rejected their overtures. In B.C. -409 Manasseh, a grandson of the high priest expelled by Nehemiah for -an unlawful marriage with a daughter of Sanballat, of the Samaritan -city of Beth-horon, built the schismatic temple on Mount Gerizim.[433] -The relations of the Samaritans to the Jews became thenceforth deadly. -In B.C. 175 they seconded the profane attempt of Antiochus Epiphanes -to paganise the Jews, and in B.C. 130 John Hyrcanus, the Maccabee, -destroyed their temple. They were accused of waylaying Jews on their -way to the Feasts, and of polluting the Temple with dead bones.[434] -They claimed Jewish descent (John iv. 12), but our Lord called them -"aliens" ([Greek: allogens], Luke xvii. 18), and Josephus describes -them as "residents from other nations" ([Greek: metoikoi, -alloethneis]). They are now a rapidly dwindling community of fewer -than a hundred souls--"the oldest and smallest sect in the -world"--equally despised by Jews and Mohammedans. The Jews, as in the -days of Christ, have no dealings with them. When Dr. Frankl, on his -philanthropic visit to the Jews of the East, went to see their -celebrated Pentateuch, and mentioned the fact to a Jewish -lady--"What!" she exclaimed: "have you been among the worshippers of -the pigeon? Take a purifying bath!" Regarding Gerizim as the place -which God had chosen (John iv. 20), they alone can keep up the old -tradition of the _sacrificial_ passover. For long centuries, since the -Fall of Jerusalem, it is only on Gerizim that the Paschal lambs and -kids have been actually slain and eaten, as they are to this day, and -will be, till, not long hence, the whole tribe disappears. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[389] Hos. iv. 4; v. 1, "Hear ye this, O priests ... ye have been a -snare on Mizpah," etc.; vi. 9, "The company of the priests murder by -the way to Shechem." - -[390] Hos. x. 10 (so R.V., and in the main the versions after the Hebrew -margin). LXX., [Greek: en t paideuesthai autous en tais dysin adikiais -autn]; Vulg., "_cum corripientur propter duas iniquitates suas_"; A.V., -"When they shall bind themselves in their two furrows." I believe that -the "_two_ iniquities" may mean _two_ cherubs at Bethel. See x. 15: "So -shall Bethel do unto you because of the evil of your evil." - -[391] Hos. xi. 8-11. - -[392] 2 Kings xvii. 1 is inconsistent with xv. 30, 33, and it is -wholly useless for our purpose to enter into complicated chronological -hypotheses, every one of which may be erroneous. - -[393] Schrader, _K. A. T._, p. 255. - -[394] _Seder Olam_, xxii. 2; 2 Chron. xxx. 6-11. - -[395] See Herod., ii. 137; called So (Heb., S or Seve) in 2 Kings -xvii. 4. Perhaps Shebek, the founder of the twenty-fifth dynasty. -LXX., [Greek: Sgr]; Vulg., _Sua_; Manetho, _Sabachon_. In the -_Eponym Canon_ he is called an Egyptian general, _Sibakhi_, who helped -Gaza against Assyria, and was defeated. The _ka_ appended at the end -of his name (Egyptian Shaba-ka) is thought by some to be the Cushite -article. The race of the priest Hirhor died out with Piankhi, and the -Ethiopians elected a noble named Kashta. Shabak was his son. He -conquered Sais, and burnt his rival Bek-en-raut alive (B.C. 724). His -dynasty ruled for fifty years; he was succeeded by Sevechus -(Shabatok), and he by Tehrak (Tirhakah). - -[396] His name means "Salmn, pardon." We have no monuments or -inscriptions of this king; only an imperial weight. - -[397] Mic. v. 1. - -[398] Hos. xiii. 13. - -[399] Hos. xiii. 7-11. The prophecy is rhythmic, though not written in -actual poetry. - -[400] Till the discovery of the Assyrian records, Sargon (Sharru-knu, -'the faithful king') was but a name. The Jews knew but little of him. He -is but once mentioned in Scripture (Isa. xx. 1), and was probably -confused by some Jews with other kings. Yet he reigned sixteen years -(722-705), and his records give the annals of fifteen campaigns. In 720 -he crushed a confederacy headed by Yahubid of Hamath, and reduced that -city to a "heap of ruins." He then advanced against Hanno, King of Gaza, -who was in alliance with Sabaco, and defeated the combined forces of the -Philistines and Egyptians at Raphia, half-way between Gaza and the -Wady-el-Arsh, "the torrent [_nachal_] of Egypt." Sargon was at the time -too much occupied with other enemies to pursue his advantage over Egypt; -for Armenia, Media, and other countries needed his attention. This -encouraged Ashdod to rebel, and its king, Azuri, refused his tribute -(see Isa. xx. 1). Sargon deposed him, and put his brother Ahimit in his -place. Relying on Egyptian promises, Philistia joined Judah, Edom, and -Moab in defying Assyria. They deposed Ahimit as an Assyrian nominee, and -put Yaman in his place. Egypt, as usual, failed to help, and in 711 the -Assyrian Turtan, or Commander-in-chief, took Ashdod after three years' -resistance, and carried its people into captivity. The punishment of -Egypt was reserved for the subsequent reigns of Esarhaddon (681-668) and -Assurbanipal. See Driver's _Isaiah xlv._ (Isa. xx.). Isa. xiv. 29-32 is -an ode of triumph for the Fall of Philistia. - -[401] Hos. xiii. 16. - -[402] See De Hincks in _Journ. of Sacr. Lit._, October 1858; Layard, -_Nin. and Bab._, i. 148. - -[403] Isa. xxviii. 1-4. - -[404] 2 Kings xvii. 13, "by all the prophets, and all the _seers_," -(_chseh_). Havernick thinks that the _nebi'm_ were such _officially_. - -[405] See Amos ii. 4, 5; Isa. xxviii. 15; Jer. xvi. 19, 20; Ezek. xx. -13-30, etc. - -[406] Deut. xxvi. 5. - -[407] Isa. xli. 14. - -[408] Hos. xi. 9. - -[409] See my _Minor Prophets_, 6-97. - -[410] Not as in A.V., "Habor, _by_ the river of Gozan." - -[411] 2 Kings xvii. 6. The LXX. has "rivers" and "mountains": [Greek: -en Alae kai en Abr potamois Gzan kai hor Mdn]. The river is not -Ezekiel's Chebar. These deportations _en masse_ of a whole population, -with their women and children, their waggons and flocks, are depicted -on Sargon's series of tablets in his splendid palace at Khorsabad. - -[412] Ezra iv. 10. "The great and noble Asnapper" of the passage is -either some Assyrian general, or a confusion of the name Assurbanipal. - -[413] 2 Kings xvii. 9. Heb., "covered"; A.V. and R.V., "did secretly," -rather "perfidiously"; LXX., [Greek: mphiesanto logous adikous kata -kyrion]; Vulg., _Et offenderunt verbis non rectis dominum suum_. - -[414] Star-worship is not mentioned in the Book of the Covenant (Exod. -xx.-xxiii.) or the oldest sections of the Mosaic Law. It is first -forbidden in Deut. iv. 19, xvii. 3, when contact with Syrians and -Assyrians made it known (comp. Job xxxi. 26-28; Jer. viii. 2, xix. 13; -Zeph. i. 5). The language of 2 Kings vii.-xxiii. frequently reflects -the prohibitions of Deuteronomy (see Deut. xii. 2, 30, 31, iv. 19, v. -7, 8, xvi. 21, xviii. 10, xxxi. 16, etc.) - -[415] In 2 Kings xvii. 11, for "they did wicked things," the LXX. has -[Greek: koinnous] (_i.e._, _qedeshm_) [Greek: echaraxan kai -hetairidas] (_qedeshth_); _i.e._, they had depraved _hieroduli_ of -both sexes. Comp. Hos. iv. 14; Gen. xxxviii. 21 (where the allusion is -to one of the votaries of Asherah). - -[416] Bishop Lightfoot, _Sermons_, p. 267. - -[417] "La quale Religione se ne Principi della Republica Christiana si -fusse mantenuta, secondo che dal dottore d'essa ne fu ordinato, -sarebbero gli State e le Republiche Christiane pi unite e pi felici -assai ch' elle non sono" (_Discorsi_, i. 12). - -[418] 2 Kings xvii. 24. Comp. xviii. 34. Hence the later Jews -comprehensively called the Samaritans Cuthites. Comp. 2 Kings xix. 13; -Isa. xxxvii. 13. - -[419] Heliopolis, Ptolemy, v. 18, 7; Isa. xxxvi. 19. Here, according -to the Chaldan legends, Xisuthrus buried his tablets about the -Creation, etc. - -[420] From Ezra iv. 2 some infer that the main immigrants were -introduced by Esarhaddon, who did not succeed till B.C. 681. He claims -to have colonised Syria. - -[421] So we see from 2 Kings xix. 13, which applies to the reign of -Hezekiah. - -[422] See Appendix, "The Golden Calves." - -[423] He uses the agency of "the great and noble Asnapper" (Ezra iv. -10) for the deportation (see Botta, 145; Layard, _Nin. and Bab._, i. -148; Dr. Hincks, _Jour. of Sacr. Lit._, October 1858), unless Asnapper -be a confusion for Assurbanipal (Sardanapalus). - -[424] Hos. iii. 4. - -[425] See Jer. xlix. 19, l. 44; Prov. xxii. 13, etc. - -[426] Lit., "Daughter-huts" (Selden, _De Dis Syr._, ii. 7), but probably -a transliteration. Zarpanit--"She who gives seed"--was Aphrodite -Pandemos (Mylitta--Herod., i. 199). The Rabbis--who only guess--say she -represented "the Clucking Hen"--_i.e._, the Pleiades. There does not -seem to be any connection between Succoth and "Sakkuth," the various -reading in Amos v. 26, which seems to be the Assyrian Moloch. - -[427] Said to be worshipped under the form of a cock. - -[428] LXX., [Greek: Eblazer]. Jarchi says these deities were -worshipped under base animal forms--but it is more than doubtful. - -[429] The Rabbis, from Exod. xxiii. 13; Josh. xxiii. 7, thought they -were bound to give scornful nicknames to heathen deities. Hence such -changes as Kir-Heres for Kir-Cheres, Beelzebub for Beelzebul, Bethaven -for Bethel, Bosheth for Baal, etc. - -[430] Not as in A.V., "of the lowest of them," but "of all classes." -Comp. 1 Kings xii. 31. - -[431] In 2 Kings xvii. 31-38 we again find repeated references to -Deuteronomy (iv. 23, v. 32, x. 20, etc.). - -[432] Ezra iv. 1. The actual word "Samaritans" occurs only once in the -Old Testament, in 2 Kings xvii. 29. - -[433] See Neh. xiii. 4-9, 28, 29; Jos., _Antt._, XI. vii. 2. Josephus -makes Manasseh a brother of the high priest Jaddua (B.C. 333). - -[434] Jos., _Antt._, IX. xiv. 3, XII. v. 5, XIII. ix. 1, XX. vi., -XVIII. ii. 2. The bitterly hostile relations between Jews and -Samaritans in the time of Christ are illustrated by Luke ix. 52-54. - - - - - CHAPTER XXII - - _THE REIGN OF AHAZ_ - - B.C. 735-715 - - 2 KINGS xvi. 1-20 - - "Rimmon, whose delightful seat - Was fair Damascus, on the fertile banks - Of Abbana and Pharphar, lucid streams. - He also against the House of God was bold: - A leper once he lost, and gained a king-- - Ahaz, his sottish conqueror, whom he drew - God's altar to disparage and displace - For one of Syrian mode, whereon to burn - His odious offerings, and adore the gods - Whom he had vanquished." - _Paradise Lost_, i. 467-476. - - -According to our authorities, Ahaz ("Possessor")[435] began his reign -of sixteen years at the age of twenty. Of the exactitude of these -references we cannot be certain, because they also state (2 Kings -xviii. 2) that Hezekiah was twenty-five years old when he began to -reign, and this reduces us to the absurdity of supposing that Hezekiah -was born when his father was only eleven years old.[436] We might -infer from Isa. iii. 4 that Ahaz was not so old as twenty when he -succeeded Jotham; for there--in a terrible prophecy which can only -refer to the beginning of this reign--we read, "And I will give -children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them"; or, as -it should be perhaps rendered, "And with childishness, or wilfulness, -shall they rule over them." - -Whatever may have been the king's age, surely never king succeeded to -a more distracted kingdom, or reigned over a more terrified people! If -he could have had any choice in the matter, he might well have -declined the fearful burden. Describing the state of things, the great -prophet Isaiah, who now began his career, exclaims,-- - -"For, behold, the Lord, the Lord of hosts, doth take away from Jerusalem -and from Judah stay and staff, the whole stay of bread, and the whole -stay of water; the mighty man, and the man of war, the judge, and the -prophet, and the diviner, and the elder; the captain of fifty, and the -honourable man, and the counsellor, and the cunning charmer, and the -skilful enchanter. And the people shall be oppressed every one by -another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself -proudly against the elder, and the base against the honourable. Then a -man shall take hold of his brother in the house of his father, saying, -'Thou hast clothing, be _thou our judge, and let this ruin be under thy -hand_': in that day shall he lift his voice, saying, 'I will not be a -builder-up; for in my house is neither bread nor clothing: ye shall not -make me a ruler of the people.' For Jerusalem is ruined and Judah is -fallen. The show of their countenance is against them; and they declare -their sin as Sodom, and hide it not. As for My people, children are -their oppressors, and women rule over them."[437] - -This is a frightful picture of famine--the dearth of intellect, the -dearth of statesmen, of all genius, of all insight. It describes the -prevalence of oppression and of ghastly destitution, accompanied by -such utter despair that no one cared to exert himself for the arrest -of the ruin which seemed imminent over that which was already no -better than itself a ruin. - -The Book of Isaiah is arranged in a most confused and unchronological -manner, and it is probable that the first five chapters should be -placed after the sixth, which describes the prophet's call in the year -that King Uzziah died. They paint a picture of moral collapse. His -first chapter is called by Ewald "the great arraignment," and by its -references describes the awful period of alarm during the war of Syria -and Ephraim against Judah. It might seem as if the combined host was -even then in the country, or had only just retired from it; for we -read,-- - -"Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire: your land, -strangers devour it in your presence, and it is desolate, as overthrown -by strangers. And the daughter of Zion is left as a booth in a -wilderness, as a lodge in a garden of cucumbers, as a besieged city." - -But even in the midst of this afflictive dispensation there were no -signs of repentance. The children of Israel were rebels who despised -the Holy One of Israel,--"Ah, sinful nation, a people laden with -iniquity, a seed of evil-doers, children that deal corruptly!" (i. -7-9). They had all the externals of religion: they offered vain -sacrifices, and kept a multitude of idle feasts, and offered many -formal prayers; but all this was but a cumbrance to Him who desired -clean hands and a pure heart as conditions of forgiveness (10-20). -What hope could there be for a city of murderers, who loved bribes -and perverted judgment (21-24)? The land was full of pride, full of -idols, full of the luxury of the rich amid the starvation of the poor -(ii. 1-22).[438] Women partook of the general corruption. They walked -mincingly with stretched-forth necks and wanton eyes,[439] thinking of -nothing but their anklets, and crescents, and bracelets, and mufflers, -ear-drops, head-tires, perfumes, mirrors, armlets, and nose-jewels: -therefore they should have sackcloth for stomachers, ropes for -girdles, and burning instead of beauty, and only a remnant should -escape (iii. 16-iv. 1). Judah was like a vineyard,--rich in -advantages, blessed with fondest care; but when God looked for grapes, -it only brought forth wild grapes--a semblance, but only a poisoned -semblance, of the true vintage: therefore it should be left neglected -and rainless. Woe to the greedy land-grabbing, and drunkenness, and -revelry of the rich! Woe to their mockery of God and their devotion to -vanity! Woe to their insane pride and wanton injustice! Could they -escape vengeance? No! Jehovah had looked for judgment (_mishpat_), but -behold oppression (_mishpach_); for righteousness (_tse'dakah_), but -behold a cry (_tse'akah_) (v. 1-24).[440] They might escape--they -would escape--the Syrian and the Ephraimite; but behind these lay a -more terrible and a more portentous foe, even the Assyrian, the -scourge of God's wrath (25-30). - -"It was told the house of David, saying, Syria is confederate with -Ephraim." Is it strange that in such a condition of things the heart -of Ahaz and of his people "was moved as the trees of the wood are -moved with the wind"? - -Such was the terrible crisis at which Isaiah began his ministry. He -was the son of Amoz,[441] who has been (much too precariously) -identified with a brother of Amaziah. It is probable that he was a man -of distinguished, if not princely, birth, and he exercised a more -powerful influence over the politics of his country than any other -prophet--not even excepting Jeremiah. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[435] Probably a shortened form for Jehoahaz ("The Lord taketh hold"). -He is called Jahuhazi in Tiglath-Pileser's inscription (Schrader, -_Keilinschr._, p. 163). - -[436] For twenty-five it is not improbable that we should read fifteen. - -[437] Isa. iii. 1-12. - -[438] In Isa. ii. 2-4 we find, as so often in the prophetic books in -their present too-often-haphazard arrangement, a glowing promise of -universal peace placed before unsparing denunciations. The verses are -also found in Micah (iv. 1, 2), and it has been conjectured that in -both prophets they are a quotation from some older source--perhaps -from Jonah, son of Amittai. - -[439] Heb., "deceiving with their eyes." - -[440] Isa. v. 7. The paronomasia of the original is striking. Van Oort -renders it, "He looked for _reason_, but behold _treason_; and for -_right_, but behold _affright_." - -[441] His name means "Jehovah saves," and is perhaps alluded to in Isa. -viii. 18. Amos ("One who bears a burden"), needless to say, is a totally -different name from that of Amoz ("Vigorous"), the father of Isaiah. - - - - - CHAPTER XXIII - - _ISAIAH AND AHAZ_ - - 2 KINGS xvi - - "Expediency is man's wisdom; doing right is God's." - GEORGE MEREDITH. - - -Isaiah was one of those men whom God provides for the need of -kingdoms. He was not only a prophet, but a statesman, a reformer, a -poet, a man of invincible faith and unequalled insight. If Ahaz had -accepted his counsels and followed his moral guidance, the whole -history of Judah might have been different. - -But the position of things was indeed disastrous. Judah was attacked -from every side. On the south-east the Edomites renewed their -devastating raids, and swept off multitudes of captives, who were sold -as slaves in the Western slave-markets. On the south-west the -Philistines once more rose in revolt, and acquired permanent -repossession of many parts of the Shephelah, mastering Beth-Shemesh, -Ajalon, Gederoth, Shocho, Timnath, Gimzo, and all the adjacent -districts. But this was nothing compared with the humiliation and -destruction inflicted by Rezin and Pekah. They shut up Ahaz in -Jerusalem; and though they could not storm its almost impregnable -defences, which had recently been fortified by Uzziah and Jotham, they -were undisputed masters of the rest of the land, so that Judah was -"brought low and made naked."[442] Rezin, indeed, weary of a tedious -siege, swept southwards to Elath, on the gulf of Akabah, seized it, and -peopled it with an Edomite garrison, thereby destroying the commerce in -which Solomon and Jehoshaphat had taken pride, and which Uzziah had -recently re-established. Having thus left an effectual annoyance to -Judah in his rear, he gave up the design of dethroning Ahaz and -substituting in his place "_the son of Tabeal_," who would have been a -tool in the hands of the confederate kings. He seized, however, a -multitude of captives, and with them and with much booty he returned to -Damascus. "The son of Tabeal"--a name which occurs nowhere else--has -been found very puzzling.[443] I believe it to be simply an instance of -the Rabbinic process of transposition, called _Themourah_. Some identify -it with Itibi'alu of an inscription of Tiglath-Pileser. Others suppose -that he was a Syrian, and that Tabeal stands for Tabrimnon. But by the -application of Themourah (called the _Albam_) Tabeal simply gives us -"Remaliah," and is either a scornful variation of the name of Pekah's -father, or has arisen from the watchword of a secret conspiracy. Since -in the text of Jeremiah (li. 41, xxv. 26) (by _Atbash_, another form of -the secret transposition of letters of which the generic name was -_Gematria_) we read _Sheshach_ for Babel, the name Tabeal may have been -dealt with in a similar method.[444] Pekah, according to the Chronicler, -inflicted far deadlier injuries than Rezin. In one day he slew one -hundred and twenty thousand "sons of valour," because they had forsaken -Jehovah, God of their fathers. His general Zichri, a mighty Ephraimite, -slew Maaseiah, the king's son;[445] and Azrikam, the chancellor; and -Elkanah, "the second to the king." The army carried away two hundred -thousand captives and much spoil to Samaria. But on their arrival, a -prophet named Oded[446] reproved the Israelites for having massacred the -Judans "in a rage that reacheth to heaven." Aided by various princes, -he succeeded in inducing the people to refuse to harbour the captives, -and clothed, fed, and sent them back unharmed to Jericho, mounting the -feeble on horses and asses. The story bears on the face of it the signs -of enormous exaggeration. - -In the crisis of their miseries, but just before the siege, Ahaz had -gone outside the city walls "at the end of the conduit of the upper -pool, in the causeway of the fuller's field," probably to look after -the water-supply, which had always been a difficulty for Jerusalem, -and on which depended her capacity to withstand a siege. Here he was -met by the prophet Isaiah, who was leading by the hand the little son -to whom he had given the name of "Shear-jashub" ("A remnant shall -return"),[447] as a witness to the truth of the prophecy which he had -heard on the occasion of his call,-- - -"And if there should yet be a tenth in it, this shall be again consumed; -yet as the terebinth and the oak, though cut down, have their stock -remaining, even so a sacred seed shall be the stock thereof."[448] - -The object of the prophet was to cheer up the fainting heart of the -king, and to say to him first,-- - -"Take heed, and be quiet." - -This mandate probably refers to rumours--which Isaiah must have -heard--of the king's intention to follow the counsels of the party which -urged him to seek foreign assistance. One of these parties advised him -to throw himself into the arms of Egypt, and rely on her protection; the -other gave the more perilous counsel of invoking the aid of Assyria. -Isaiah's mandate to the king and to the nation was to take neither step, -but to trust in the Lord, and to repent of individual and national -misdoing. He summed up his message in the rule,-- - -"In returning and rest shall ye be saved; in quietness and confidence -shall be your strength." - -The advice was emphasised by a promise of the most decisive and -encouraging kind. When all looked so helpless, the prophet was bidden -to say,-- - -"Fear not, neither be faint-hearted, for these two stumps of smoking -torches, for the fierce anger of Rezin with Syria, and of Remaliah's -son. They have taken evil counsel against thee. But thus saith the -Lord God, 'It shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass. For the -head of Syria is only Rezin, and the head of Samaria is a mere -Remaliah's son.'"[449] - -And then, to confirm the lesson of confidence in God, the brief -assurance,-- - - "If ye will not confide, - Surely ye shall not abide." - -Convinced of the certainty of this immediate deliverance, Isaiah bade -the king to ask for a sign from Jehovah, either in the height above, -or in the depth beneath. - -But the timid and hypocritical king was not so to be influenced. He -had on his side "the scornful men, who ruled Judah"; the mocking -priests, who sneered and jeered at Isaiah's teaching as repetitive and -commonplace, and only fit for children; and the princes and nobles, -who formed the Court party, headed by Shebna the scribe. He probably -looked on Isaiah as a mere unpractical faddist, an excited -fanatic--all very well as a prophet, but not a man who ought to thrust -himself into the plans of politicians. Ahaz had his own plans, and he -had not the smallest intention of altering them in consequence of -anything which Isaiah might say. He was far too timid and unfaithful -to rely on anything so vague as Divine assurance. He was convinced -that his only chance lay in the horses of Egypt or the fierce infantry -of Assyria. So he said with sham piety, merely intended to put the -prophet off, "I will not ask, neither will I tempt Jehovah." - -That moment marks what may be called the birth-throe of Messianic -prophecy in its most specific character. For then the prophet, after -reproving the king for wearying Jehovah as well as His servants, adds, -in words of far wider and deeper significance than their immediate -bearing, that Jehovah Himself should give a sign; for the maiden -should conceive and bear a Son, and call His name Immanuel ("God with -us"). The child should grow up in a time of scarcity; for owing to the -devastation of the land, he would only be able to be nurtured on -curdled milk and honey. But before he had reached years of -discretion--before he had arrived at the power of moral choice--the -land whose two kings Ahaz abhorred should be a desert. Yet let not -Ahaz exult too much in the immediate deliverance! Days of unexampled -misery were at hand. Jehovah should hiss for the fly from the farthest -canals of Egypt, and for the bee of Assyria, and they should settle in -swarms in the valleys and pastures. Ahaz--he had not alluded to the -design, but Isaiah knew it well--was about to hire a razor from beyond -the Euphrates, but that razor should sweep away the hair and beard of -Judah. Agriculture should languish, and the people should only be able -to live in privation on whey and honey; and the vineyards should be -full of briers and thorns, and should be mere places for hunting.[450] - -This event, therefore, as Caspari says, stands at the turning-point of -Old Testament History. It marks the beginning of that second period of -the History of the Chosen People in which their hopes were granted as -a counterpoise to their anguish and their humiliation. "It stood, -therefore, at the point where a prospect offered itself to the eye of -the prophet which reached out over the whole development of the people -of God." - -To all such prophecies Ahaz was utterly deaf: they did not for a -moment induce him to swerve from his purpose. But to call still -further attention to his promise as the Syrian Ephraimitish host -pressed forward, Isaiah took a great piece of vellum, and inscribed on -it, in the ordinary characters,-- - - "SPEED-PLUNDER-HASTE-SPOIL." - -He put it up in some conspicuous place, before his own house or in the -Temple, and took the priest Urijah and Zechariah, the son of -Jeberechiah, into his confidence as faithful witnesses. He told them the -explanation of his sign, and they would satisfy the curiosity of the -people on the subject. It meant that in nine months' time his wife -should bear a son, and that he and his wife, the prophetess, would call -the boy's name "Speed-plunder-haste-spoil," as a sign that before the -child was able to say "Father" or "Mother" Rezin and Pekah should be -extinguished. For the Assyrian should speed to the plunder and haste to -the spoil, and the riches of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria should be -carried away by the King of Assyria. Since Judah despised "the soft -flowing waters of Shiloah,"[451] and preferred Rezin and Pekah,[452] -they should be deluged by the Euphrates of Assyria, and Assyria's -outspread wings should overshadow thy land, O Immanuel (viii. 1-8). How -vain, then, of the people to try and meet the confederacy of Syria and -Ephraim by new confederacy of Judah with Assyria! This, after all, is -Immanuel's land. God is with us. We have but to fear God, we have but to -be faithful to duty, and Jehovah shall be our sanctuary, though He be a -stumbling-block to many in Israel, and a snare to many in -Jerusalem.[453] This is God's teaching and God's testimony, and Isaiah -and his children are signs of it. For does not Isaiah mean "Salvation of -Jehovah"; and Shear-jashub, "A remnant shall return"; and -Maher-shalal-hash-baz, "Swift-spoil-speedy-prey"; and Immanuel, "God is -with us"? What need, then, to seek wizards and necromancers? Seek God; -confide, abide![454] Trouble and darkness there should be; but all was -not utterly hopeless. Northern Israel had been bedimmed and afflicted; -but soon they should be exalted, and see light, and their yoke be broken -as in the day of Midian, and the trampling boot and blood-stained mantle -of the warrior shall be burned in the fire: for a Child is born, a Son -is given unto us of David's line, who shall be a Mighty Deliverer, a -Prince of Peace,--and Israel shall perish. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[442] 2 Chron. xxviii. 19. - -[443] It may mean "God is good" (Tabeel). - -[444] For further explanations I must refer to my paper on Rabbinic -Exegesis (_Expositor_, First Series, v. 373). - -[445] 2 Chron. xxviii. 7. - -[446] Of Oded nothing else is known. - -[447] Some, however, interpret the name "A remnant repents" (LXX., -[Greek: ho kataleiphtheis Iasoub]; Vulg., _Qui derelictus est Jaseb_). - -[448] Isa. vi. 13. - -[449] The words "And within threescore and five years shall Ephraim be -broken, that it be not a people" (Isa. vii. 8), are almost certainly -an interpolation: for (1) the overthrow came within far less than -sixty years; (2) the clause awkwardly breaks the context; (3) the -"sixty years" is inconsistent with the promise (vii. 16) that it -should be within very few years. - -[450] Isa. vii. 1-25. - -[451] Not improbably the water which afterwards flowed through -Hezekiah's new tunnel between the Virgin's Tomb and the Pool of -Siloam. It is referred to in 2 Chron. xxxii. 3, 30 (Isa. xxii. 9-11). -See Appendix II. - -[452] This, if it be correct, can only mean that the son of Tabeal had -a party in Jerusalem; but Hitzig renders it "_dreadeth_," not -"rejoiceth in." - -[453] The meaning is by no means clear. - -[454] See Driver, _Isaiah_, p. 34. - - - - - CHAPTER XXIV - - _THE APOSTASIES OF AHAZ_ - - 2 KINGS xvi. 1-18 - - "For when we in our wickedness grow hard, - Oh misery on't! the wise gods seal our eyes; - In our own filth drop our clear judgments; make us - Adore our errors; laugh at us while we strut - To our confusion." - - -Ahaz was indifferent to these prophecies because his heart was -otherwhere. It is clear from our authorities that this king had excited -an unusually deep antipathy in the hearts of those later writers who -judged religion not only from the earlier standpoint, but from the stern -and inexorable requirements of the Deuteronomic and the Priestly Codes. -The historian, adopting an unusual phrase, says that "he did not that -which was right in the sight of the Lord, but he walked in the ways of -the kings of Israel." He not only continued the high places, as the best -of his predecessors had done, but he increased their popularity and -importance by personally offering sacrifices and burning incense "on the -hills and under every green tree." It is probable, too, that he -introduced into Judah horses and chariots dedicated to the sun.[455] "He -made molten images for the Baalim," says the Chronicler, "and burnt -incense in the valley of the son of Himmon." - -This last was his crowning atrocity: he actually sanctioned the -revolting worship of the abomination of the children of Ammon, which -Solomon had tolerated on the mount of offence. "He made his son to -pass through the fire." The Chronicler expresses it still more -dreadfully by saying that "he _burnt his children_ in the fire."[456] - -In the Valley of Ben-Hinnom, or of the Ben-Hinnom, of which the name -is perpetuated in Gehenna, the place of torture for lost souls, there -stood a frightful image of the king--Moloch, Melek, Malcham. It -represented the sun-god, worshipped, not only as Baal under the -emblems of prolific nature, but, like the Egyptian Typhon, as the -emblem of the sun's scorching and blighting force. It was perhaps a -human figure with the head of an ox. The arms of the brazen image -sloped downwards over a cistern, which was filled with fuel; and when -a human sacrifice was to be offered to him, the child was probably -first killed, and then placed on these brazen arms as a gift to the -idol. It rolled down into the flaming tank, and was consumed amid the -strains of music. Recourse was only had to the most frightful form of -human sacrifice--the burning of grown-up victims--in extremities of -disaster, as when Mesha of Moab offered up his eldest son to Chemosh -on the wall of Kir-Hareseth in the sight of his people and of the -three invading armies. But the sacrifice of children was public, and -perhaps annual. Hence Milton, following the learned researches of -Selden in his Syntagma _De Dis Syriis_, writes:-- - - "First, Moloch, horrid king, besmeared with blood - Of human sacrifice, and parents' tears; - Though, for the noise of drums and timbrels loud, - Their children's cries unheard that pass'd through fire - To his grim idol. Him the Ammonite - Worshipp'd in Rabba and her watery plain, - In Argob and in Basan, to the stream - Of utmost Arnon. Nor content with such - Audacious neighbourhood, the wisest heart - Of Solomon he led by fraud to build - His temple right against the Temple of God - On that opprobrious hill, and made his grove - The pleasant Valley of Hinnom, Tophet thence - And black Gehenna call'd, the type of hell."[457] - -But it may be doubted whether Ahaz, in spite of his frightful -position, or, in later days, the less excusable Manasseh, really -destroyed the lives of their young sons.[458] The ancients had a -notion that they could easily cheat their devil-deities. If a white ox -of Clitumnus became unfitted for a victim to Jupiter of the Capitol by -having on its body a few black spots, it was quite sufficient to make -it pass with the _D faciles_ by chalking the black spots over -it.[459] If human victims had to be thrown into the Tiber to Hercules, -Numa taught the people that little wickerwork images (_scirpea_) would -suit the purpose just as well.[460] Figures of dough were sometimes -offered instead of human beings on the altar of Artemis of Tauris. -Thus it became the custom, it is believed, merely to throw or to pass -children through or over the flames, and conventionally to _regard -them_ as having been sacrificed, though they might escape the ordeal -with little or no hurt. This was called _februatio_, or "lustration by -fire."[461] We may hope that this device was adopted by the two Judan -kings, and, if so, they did not add to their horrible apostasy the -crime of infanticide. If, however, Ahaz was even to the smallest -extent implicated in such foul idolatries, it is not surprising that -he was in no mood to listen to Isaiah. What is profoundly surprising, -and is indeed a circumstance for which we cannot account, is that no -word of fierce indignation was addressed to him on this account by -Urijah, the high priest, whom Isaiah seems to describe as faithful, or -by Zechariah, the son of Jeberechiah, or by Micah, or by Isaiah, who -feared man so little and God so much. - -The Assyrian party at the Court of Ahaz prevailed over the Egyptian. -Until the accession of the Ethiopian Sabaco[462] in 725, Egypt was -indeed in so weak, harassed, and divided a condition under feeble -native Pharaohs, that her help was obviously unavailable. The King of -Judah, seeing no extrication from his calamities except in the way of -worldly expediency, appealed to Tiglath-Pileser. In this he followed -the precedent of his ancestor Asa, who had diverted the attack of -Baasha by invoking the assistance of Syria. Ahaz sent to the Assyrian -potentate the humble message, "I am thy servant and thy son: come up -and save me from the Kings of Syria and Israel." If he had not faith -to accept Isaiah's promises, what else could he do, when Syria, -Israel, the Philistines, Edom, and Moab were all arrayed against him? -The ambassadors probably made their way, not without peril, along the -east of Jordan, or else by sea from Joppa, and so inland. Whether they -took with them the enormous bribe without which the appeal of the -helpless king might have been in vain, or whether this was sent -subsequently under Assyrian escort, we do not know. It was -euphemistically described as "a present" or "a blessing," but must be -regarded either as a tribute or a bribe. - -Tiglath-Pileser II. saw his opportunity, and at once invaded Damascus. -In B.C. 733 he failed, but the next year he entirely subjugated the -kingdom, and put an end to the dynasty. Rezin was probably put to death -with the horrible barbarities which were normal among the brutal -Ninevites; and as the Assyrians had no conception of colonisation or the -wise government of dependencies, the Syrian population was deported _en -masse_ to Elam and an unknown Kir.[463] For a time Damascus was made "a -ruinous heap," and the cities of Aroer were the desolated lairs of -pasturing flocks. Israel, as we have seen, was next overwhelmed by the -same irremediable catastrophe, none of her people being left except such -as might be compared to the mere gleanings of a vintage, and the few -berries on the topmost boughs of the olive tree.[464] - -Tiglath-Pileser meant to make Ahaz feel his yoke. He summoned him to -do homage at Damascus, and there Ahaz once more displayed his -cosmopolitan stheticism at the expense of every pure tradition of the -religion of his fathers. - -His visit to Damascus was no doubt compulsory. His worldly policy, -which looked so expedient, and which--apart from the defiance which it -involved to the voice of God by His prophets--seemed to be so -pardonable, had for the time succeeded. Isaiah's promises had been -fulfilled to the letter. There was nothing more to fear either from -Rezin or from Remaliah's son. Their kingdoms were a desolation. In his -own annals Tiglath-Pileser[465] does not exaggerate his -achievements.[466] He wrote as follows:-- - - "Rezin's warriors I captured, and with the sword I destroyed. - Of his charioteers and [his horsemen] the arms I broke: - Their bow-bearing warriors, [their footmen] armed with spear and - shield, - With my hand I captured them, and those that fought in their - battle-line. - He to save his life fled away alone; - Like a deer [he ran], and entered into the great gate of his city. - His generals, whom I had taken alive, on crosses I hung; - His country I subdued; - Damascus, his city, I subdued, and like a caged bird I shut him in. - I cut down the unnumbered trees of his forest; I left not one. - Hadara, the palace of the father of Rezin of Syria, [I burnt]. - The city of Samaria I besieged, I captured; eight hundred of its - people and children I took; - Their oxen and their sheep I carried away. - I took five hundred and ninety-one cities; - Over sixteen districts of Syria like a flood I swept." - -But the more complete destruction of Israel was due to Shalmaneser -IV., who says,-- - - "The city of Samaria I besieged, I took, - I carried away twenty-seven thousand two hundred of its inhabitants; - I seized fifty of their chariots. - I gave up to plunder the rest of their possessions. - I appointed officers over them; - I laid on them the tribute of the former king. - In their place I settled the men of conquered countries." - -The immediate service to Judah looked immense. The Assyrian might safely -claim, and Ahaz might truthfully confess, that the intervention of -Tiglath-Pileser had rescued him from the apparent imminence of -destruction. But the Assyrian kings served no one for nothing. The price -which had to be paid for Tiglath-Pileser's intervention was vassalage -and tribute. Ahaz, or, as the Assyrians call him, Jehoahaz,[467] had -styled himself Tiglath-Pileser's "servant and his son," and the Assyrian -chose to have substantial proof of this parental suzerainty. The great -king therefore summoned the poor subject-potentate to Damascus, where he -was holding his victorious court. - -So far Ahaz had no reason to complain of his "dreadful patron"; and if -he had returned when he paid his homage, no immediate harm would have -happened. But during his visit he saw "the altar" (_Heb._) at the -conquered city. Was it the altar of the defeated Syrian god Rimmon? or -did the Assyrian persuade his willing vassal to sacrifice at the -portable altar of his god Assur? We may, perhaps, infer the former -from 2 Chron. xxviii. 23, where Ahaz says: "Because the gods of the -kings of Syria help them, therefore will I sacrifice to them, that -they may help me." There is room to suspect some error here, because -Rezin had fallen, and Damascus was in ruins, and Rimmon had -conspicuously failed to help or to avenge his votaries.[468] Ahaz -admired the altar, to whatever god it had been erected; and unmindful, -or perhaps unconscious, that the altar of the Temple of Jerusalem was -declared in the Pentateuch to have been divinely ordained--a fact to -which the historian does not himself refer--he sent to the head priest -Urijah a pattern of the altar which had struck his fancy at Damascus. -The subservient priest, without a murmur or a remonstrance, undertook -to have a similar altar ready for Ahaz in the Temple by the time of -his return--a crime, if crime it were, which the Chronicler conceals. -"Never any prince was so foully idolatrous," says Bishop Hall, "as -that he wanted a priest to second him. A Urijah is fit to humour an -Ahaz.[469] Greatness could never command anything which some servile -wits were not ready both to applaud and justify." Certainly we should -have hoped for more fidelity to ancient tradition from a man who -earned the approving word of Isaiah; but it is only fair and just to -admit that Urijah, in the universal ignorance which prevailed about -the codes which were afterwards collected and published as the total -legislation of the wilderness, may have viewed his obedience to the -king's commands with very different eyes from those by which it was -regarded in the sixth and fifth centuries before Christ. He may have -been frankly unaware that he was guilty of an act which would -afterwards be denounced as an apostatising enormity.[470] - -When Ahaz returned, he was so much pleased with his new plaything that -he at once acted as priest at his own new altar. Without the least -opposition from the priests--who had so sternly resisted Uzziah--he -offered burnt-offerings and meat-offerings and drink-offerings, and -sprinkled the blood of peace-offerings on his altar.[471] Not content -with this, he did not hesitate to order the removal of the huge brazen -altar from the position, in front of the Temple porch, which it had -held since the days of Solomon. He did this in order that his own -favourite altar might be in the line of vision from the court, and not -be overshadowed by the old one, which he shifted from the place of -honour to the north side. He proceeded to call his own altar "the -great altar," and ordered that the morning burnt-offering, and the -evening _minchah_, and all the principal sacrifices should henceforth -be offered upon it.[472] He did not wholly supersede the old brazen -altar, which, he said, "shall be for me to inquire by," or, as the -Hebrew may perhaps mean, "it should await"--_i.e._, "I will hereafter -consider what to do with it." - -Ahaz is charged with the additional crime of removing the ornamental -festoons of bronze pomegranates from the lavers, and the brazen oxen -from under the molten sea, which henceforth lay dishonoured, without its -proper and splendid supports, on the pavement of the court.[473] He -also took away the balustrade of the royal "ascent" from the palace to -the Temple, and made a new entrance of a less gorgeous character than -that which, in the days of Solomon, the Queen of Sheba had admired.[474] - -No doubt these proceedings helped to heighten the unpopularity of -Ahaz. But what could he do? He could, indeed, if he had had sufficient -faith, have "trusted in Jehovah," as Isaiah bade him do. But he was -under the terrific pressure of hostile circumstances, and, being a -weak and timid man, felt himself unable to resist the influence of the -haughty politicians and worldly priests by whom he was surrounded--men -who openly made Isaiah their scoff. When he invited the interposition -of Tiglath-Pileser,[475] all the other consequences of humiliation -would naturally follow. He probably disliked as much as any one to see -the great molten laver taken off the backs of the oxen which showed -the skill of the ancient Hiram, and did not admire the despoiled -aspect of the shrine of his capital. But if the King of Assyria or his -emissaries had (as the historian implies) cast greedy eyes on these -splendid objects of antiquity, the poor vassal could not refuse them. -Better, he may have thought, that these material ornaments should go -to Nineveh than that he should be forced to exact yet heavier burdens -from an impoverished people. His expedient is mentioned among his -crimes, yet no one blamed the pious Hezekiah when, under similar -circumstances, he acted in precisely the same manner.[476] - -The Chronicler gives a darker aspect to his misdoings by saying that -he cut to pieces the vessels of the house of God, and made him altars -in every corner of Jerusalem, and _bamoth_ to burn incense unto other -gods in every several city of Judah. He says, further, that he closed -the great gates of the Temple; put an end to the kindling of the -lamps, the burning of incense, and the daily offerings; and left the -whole Temple to fall into ruin and neglect.[477] We know no more of -him. He lived through an epoch marked by the final crisis in the -existence of the kingdom of Israel. Dark omens of every kind were -around him, and he seems to have been too frivolous to see them. If he -plumed himself on the removal of the two relentless invaders Rezin and -Pekah, he must have lived to feel that the terror of Assyria had come -appreciably nearer. Tiglath-Pileser had only helped Judah in -furtherance of his own designs, and his exactions came like a chronic -distress after the acuter crisis. Nor was there any improvement when -he died in 727. He was succeeded by Shalmaneser IV., and Shalmaneser -IV. by Sargon in 722, the year of the fall of Samaria. We know no more -of Ahaz. The historian says that he was buried with his fathers, and -the Chronicler adds, as in the case of Uzziah and other kings, that -he was not permitted to rest in the sepulchres of the kings.[478] He -had sown the wind; his son Hezekiah had to reap the whirlwind.[479] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[455] See 2 Kings xxiii. 11, which shows that this was not an innovation -of Manasseh's. They were common in Persia. See Q. Curtius, iii. 3. - -[456] 2 Kings xvii. 31; Ezek. xvi. 21, xxiii. 37, xxxiii. 6; Deut. -xii. 31; Jer. xix. 5. See 2 Chron. xxviii. 3; for "his son," [Hebrew: -beno], it uses [Hebrew: banav] "his sons," but perhaps generically. -Moloch-worship may have been stimulated by accounts of the Assyrian -fire-god Adrammelech (Movers, _Phniz._, ii. 101). On this sacrifice -of children to Moloch, which the Phoenicians referred back to the god -El or Il, once King of Byblos, who in a crisis of danger sacrificed -his eldest son Icond, see Plut., _De Superst._, 13; Diod. Sic., xx. -12-14; 2 Kings iii. 27, xvi. 3, xxi. 6; Mic. vi. 7; Dllinger, -_Judenthum u. Heidenthum_ (E. T.), i. 427-429. - -[457] This worship was to be punished by stoning (Lev. xviii. 21, xx. -2-5; Deut. xviii. 10). On the whole subject see Movers, _Phniz._, 64; -Jarchi _on Jer. vii._ 31; Euseb., _Prp. Ev._, iv. 16. - -[458] Josephus says that Ahaz made "a whole burnt-offering" of his -son; but his authority is very small ([Greek: kai idion hlokautsen -paida]). Comp. Psalm cvi. 37. - -[459] Ignorant Romanists have often cherished the same notions about -the saints. For centuries in Spain the people bought the old gowns and -cowls of the monks, and buried their dead in them, to deceive St. -Peter into the notion that they were Dominicans or Franciscans! - -[460] See Ovid, _Fasti_, v. 659: "Scripea pro domino Tiberi jactatur -imago." They were also called _Argei_, _id._ 621; Varro, _L. L._, vi. 3. - -[461] Varro, _L. L._, v. 3. - -[462] Herod., ii. 137. Egypt., _Sebek_; Heb., _So_ (2 Kings xvii. 4), -or perhaps _Seve_; Arab., _Shab'i_. Rawlinson, _Hist. of Anct. Egypt_, -ii. 433-450. - -[463] Kir (see Amos ix. 7) is omitted in the LXX. Elam is added in Isa. -xxii. 6. Tiglath-Pileser calls the king Rasunnu Sarimirisu--_i.e._, of -Aram. See Smith, _Assyr. Discoveries_, p. 274; _Eponym Canon_, 68; -Schrader, _K. A. T._, 152 ff. - -[464] Isa. xvii. 1-11. - -[465] The name seems to be Tuklat-abal-isarra,--according to Oppert -worshipper of the son of the Zodiac--_i.e._, of Nin or Hercules. -According to Polyhistor, he was a usurper who had been a vine-dresser -in the royal gardens. He never mentions his ancestry. But see -Schrader, _K. A. T._, 217 ff., 240 ff., and in Riehm. - -[466] _Eponym Canon_, p. 121, lines 1-15. On this fall of Damascus and -Samaria, see Isa. xvii. - -[467] Jahuhazi (Schrader, _Keilinschr._, p. 263). He probably bore -both names; but, as in the case of Jeconiah, who is called Coniah, the -omission of the element "Jehovah" from his name may have been intended -as a mark of reprobation. - -[468] The remark may refer to some earlier period in the reign of -Ahaz, before the capture of Damascus. It is more probable that the -altar was used for some Assyrian deity, and the adoption of it may -have flattered Tiglath-Pileser. - -[469] 2 Kings xvi. 11, which records the zealous subservience of Urijah, -is wanting in some MSS. of the LXX. But that the altar was made, and -without his opposition, is clear from the narrative. Asa (2 Chron. xv. -8) had repaired Solomon's great altar; Hezekiah subsequently cleansed it -(_id._ xxix. 18); Manasseh rebuilt it (_Q'ri_). The brass of it -ultimately went to Babylon (Jer. lii. 17-20). - -[470] Bhr says: "It seems that Urijah, like his companion, was only -anxious for his revenues. At any rate, his conduct is a sign of the -character and standing of the priests of that time. They were 'dumb -dogs who could not bark.' They all followed their own ways, every one -for his own gain" (Isa. lvi. 10, 11). "We have in this high priest," -says the _Wrtemberg Summary_, "a specimen of those hypocrites and -belly-servants who say, 'Whose bread I eat, his song I sing'; who veer -about with the wind, and seek to be pleasant to all men; who wish to -hurt no one's feelings, but teach just what any one wants to hear." - -[471] 1 Kings viii. 64; 2 Chron. iv. 1. In this and similar instances -commentators, biassed by _a priori_ considerations, have imagined that -Ahaz did not in person offer sacrifices. But this is what the text says, -and it was the custom of kings to regard themselves as invested with -Divine attributes. Ahaz may have had this lesson impressed on his mind -by his visit to Tiglath-Pileser. See Grtz, _Gesch. der Juden._, ii. -150. Layard, _Nin. and Bab._, 472 ff., gives us pictures of Assyrian -kings ministering at their altars, which are of various shapes. - -[472] 2 Kings xvi. 15. Vulg., _paratum erit ad voluntatem meam_. The -LXX. followed another reading: [Greek: estai moi eis to pri]. Grtz -(ii. 150), for [Hebrew: lchkr], "to inquire," reads [Hebrew: lkrv] "to -draw near to." - -[473] 1 Kings vii. 23-39. - -[474] 2 Kings xvi. 18. The allusions are obscure. R.V., "the covered -way"; A.V., "the covert for the Sabbath." See 2 Chron. ix. 4. Here the -Hebr. _Q'ri_ has _Msak_, and the Vulg. _Musach Sabbati_. The LXX. -evidently did not understand it ([Greek: kai ton themelion ts -kathedras kodomsen]). For "covert for the Sabbath," Geiger suggests -"molten images for the Shame" (Bosheth-Baal, by transposition of -_Shabbath_). Comp. 2 Chron. xxviii. 2. - -[475] 2 Chron. xxviii. 20: "Tiglath-Pileser came unto him, and -distressed him, but helped him not." - -[476] 2 Kings xviii. 15, 16. - -[477] In justice to Ahaz, we should observe that (1) in every instance -the later account multiplies and magnifies and gives a darker -colouring to his offences; (2) that neither Isaiah, Micah, nor any -other prophet has a word of reproach for such enormities in Ahaz. - -[478] It is a Jewish tradition that Hezekiah would not bury his father -Ahaz in a sarcophagus, but on a bier (_Pesachin_, f. 56, 1; -_Sanhedrin_, f. 47, 1; Grtz, _Gesch. d. Juden._, ii, 224). - -[479] His name, _Chizquyyah_, is shortened from _Yechizquyyahoo_ -(Isa. i. 1; 2 Kings xx. 10; Hos. i. 1). It means "Jehovah's strength" -(_Gesen._), or "Yah is might" (_Frst_). - - - - - PROBABLE DATES. - - - B.C. - - 745. Accession of Tiglath-Pileser. - - 746. Death of Uzziah. Accession of Jotham. First vision of Isaiah - (Isa. vi.). - - 735. Accession of Ahaz. Syro-Ephraimitish war. - - 734-732. Siege and capture of Damascus, and ravage of Northern - Israel by Tiglath-Pileser. Visit of Ahaz to Damascus. - - 727. Accession of Shalmaneser IV. - - 722. Accession of Sargon. Capture of Samaria, and captivity of the - Ten Tribes. - - 720. Defeat of Sabaco by Sargon at Raphia. - - 715(?). Accession of Hezekiah. - - 711. Sargon captures Ashdod. - - 707. Sargon defeats Merodach-Baladan, and captures Babylon. - - 705. Murder of Sargon. Accession of Sennacherib. - - 701. Sennacherib besieges Ekron. Defeats Egypt at Altaqu. Invades - Judah, and spares Hezekiah. Invades Egypt, and sends the Rabshakeh - to Jerusalem. Disaster of Assyrians at Pelusium, and disappearance - from before Jerusalem. - - 697. Death of Hezekiah. Accession of Manasseh. - - 681. Death of Sennacherib. - - 608. Battle of Megiddo. Death of Josiah. - - 607. Fall of Nineveh and Assyria. Triumph of Babylon. - - 605. Battle of Carchemish. Defeat of Pharaoh Necho by - Nebuchadrezzar. - - 599. First deportation of Jews to Babylon by Nebuchadrezzar. - - 588. Destruction of Jerusalem. Second deportation. - - 538. Cyrus captures Babylon. - - 536. Decree of Cyrus. Return of Zerubbabel and the first Jewish - exiles. - - 458. Return of Ezra. - - - - - CHAPTER XXV - - _HEZEKIAH_ - - B.C. 715-686[480] - - 2 KINGS xviii - - "For Ezekias had done the thing that pleased the Lord, and was - strong in the ways of David his father, as Esay the prophet, who - was great and faithful in his vision, had commanded him,"--ECCLUS. - xlviii. 22. - - -The reign of Hezekiah was epoch-making in many respects, but especially -for its religious reformation, and the relations of Judah with Assyria -and with Babylon. It is also most closely interwoven with the annals of -Hebrew prophecy, and acquires unwonted lustre from the magnificent -activity and impassioned eloquence of the great prophet Isaiah, who -merits in many ways the title of "the Evangelical Prophet," and who was -the greatest of the prophets of the Old Dispensation. - -According to the notice in 2 Kings xviii. 2, Hezekiah was twenty-five -years old when he began to reign in the third year of Hoshea of -Israel. This, however, is practically impossible consistently with the -dates that Ahaz reigned sixteen years and became king at the age of -twenty, for it would then follow that Hezekiah was born when his -father was a mere boy--and this, although Hezekiah does not seem to -have been the eldest son; for Ahaz had burnt "his son," and, according -to the Chronicler, more than one son, to propitiate Moloch. Probably -Hezekiah was a boy of fifteen when he began to reign. The chronology -of his reign of twenty-nine years is, unhappily, much confused. - -The historian of the Kings agrees with the Chronicler, and the son of -Sirach, in pronouncing upon him a high eulogy, and making him equal -even to David in faithfulness. There is, however, much difference in -the method of their descriptions of his doings. The historian devotes -but one verse to his reformation--which probably began early in his -reign, though it occupied many years. The Chronicler, on the other -hand, in his three chapters manages to overlook, if not to suppress, -the one incident of the reformation which is of the deepest interest. -It is exactly one of those suppressions which help to create the deep -misgiving as to the historic exactness of this biassed and late -historian. It must be regarded as doubtful whether many of the Levitic -details in which he revels are or are not intended to be literally -historic. Imaginative additions to literal history became common among -the Jews after the Exile, and leaders of that day instinctively drew -the line between moral homiletics and literal history. It may be -perfectly historical that, as the Chronicler says, Hezekiah opened and -repaired the Temple; gathered the priests and the Levites together, -and made them cleanse themselves; offered a solemn sacrifice; -reappointed the musical services; and--though this can hardly have -been till after the Fall of Samaria in 722--invited all the Israelites -to a solemn, but in some respects irregular, passover of fourteen -days. It may be true also that he broke up the idolatrous altars in -Jerusalem, and tossed their _dbris_ into the Kidron; and (again after -the deportation of Israel) destroyed some of the _bamoth_ in Israel as -well as in Judah. If he reinstituted the courses of the priests, the -collection of tithes, and all else that he is said to have done,[481] -he accomplished quite as much as was effected in the reign of his -great-grandson Josiah. But while the Chronicler dwells on all this at -such length, what induces him to omit the most significant fact of -all--the destruction of the brazen serpent? - -The historian tells us that Hezekiah "removed the _bamoth_"--the -chapels on the high places, with their ephods and teraphim--whether -dedicated to the worship of Jehovah or profaned by alien idolatry. -That he did, or attempted, something of this kind seems certain; for -the Rabshakeh, if we regard his speech as historical in its details, -actually taunted him with impiety, and threatened him with the wrath -of Jehovah on this very account. Yet here we are at once met with the -many difficulties with which the history of Israel abounds, and which -remind us at every turn that we know much less about the inner life -and religious conditions of the Hebrews than we might infer from a -superficial study of the historians who wrote so many centuries after -the events which they describe. Over and over again their incidental -notices reveal a condition of society and worship which violently -collides with what seems to be their general estimate. Who, for -instance, would not infer from this notice that in Judah, at any rate, -the king's suppression of the "high places," and above all of those -which were idolatrous, had been tolerably thorough? How much, then, -are we amazed to find that Hezekiah had not effectually desecrated -even the old shrines which Solomon had erected to Ashtoreth, Chemosh, -and Milcom[482] "at the right hand of the mount of corruption"--in -other words, on one of the peaks of the Mount of Olives, in full view -of the walls of Jerusalem and of the Temple Hill! - -"And he brake the images," or, as the R.V. more correctly renders it, -"the pillars," the _matstseboth_. Originally--that is, before the -appearance of the Deuteronomic and the Priestly Codes--no objection -seems to have been felt to the erection of a _matstsebah_. Jacob erected -one of these _baitulia_ or anointed stones at Bethel, with every sign of -Divine approval.[483] Moses erected twelve round his altar at -Sinai.[484] Joshua erected them in Shechem and on Mount Ebal. Hosea, in -one passage (iii. 4), seems to mention pillars, ephods, and teraphim as -legitimate objects of desire. Whether they have any relation to -obelisks, and what is their exact significance, is uncertain; but they -had become objects of just suspicion in the universal tendency to -idolatry, and in the deepening conviction that the second commandment -required a far more rigid adherence than it had hitherto received. - -"And cut down the groves"--or rather the Asherim, the wooden, and -probably in some instances phallic, emblems of the nature-goddess -Asherah, the goddess of fertility.[485] She is sometimes identified with -Astarte, the goddess of the moon and of love; but there is no -sufficient ground for the identification. Some, indeed, doubt whether -Asherah is the name of a goddess at all. They suppose that the word only -means a consecrated pole or pillar, emblematic of the sacred tree.[486] - -Then comes the startling addition, "And brake in pieces the brazen -serpent that Moses had made: _for unto those days the children of -Israel did burn incense to it_." This addition is all the more -singular because the Hebrew tense implies habitual worship. The story -of the brazen serpent of the wilderness is told in Num. xxi. 9; but -not an allusion to it occurs anywhere, till now--some eight centuries -later--we are told that up to this time the children of Israel had -been in the habit of burning incense to it! Comparing Num. xxi. 4, -with xxxiii. 42, we find that the scene of the serpent-plague of the -Exodus was either Zalmonah ("the place of the image") or Punon, which -Bochart connects with Phainoi, a place mentioned as famous for -copper-mines.[487] Moses, for unknown reasons, chose it as an innocent -and potent symbol; but obviously in later days it subserved, or was -mingled with, the tendency to ophiolatry, which has been fatally -common in all ages in many heathen lands. It is indeed most difficult -to understand a state of things in which the children of Israel -habitually _burned incense_ to this venerable relic, nor can we -imagine that this was done without the cognisance and connivance of -the priests. Ewald makes the conjecture that the brazen _Saraph_ had -been left at Zalmonah, and was an occasional object of Israelite -adoration in pilgrimage for the purpose. There is, however, nothing -more extraordinary in the prevalence of serpent-worship among the Jews -than in the fact that, "in the cities of Judah and the streets of -Jerusalem, we" (the Jews), "and our fathers, our kings, and our -princes, burnt incense unto the Queen of Heaven."[488] If this were -the case, the serpent may have been brought to Jerusalem in the -idolatrous reign of Ahaz. It shows an intensity of reforming zeal, and -an inspired insight into the reality of things, that Hezekiah should -not have hesitated to smash to pieces so interesting a relic of the -oldest history of his people, rather than see it abused to idolatrous -purposes.[489] Certainly, in conduct so heroic, and hatred of idolatry -so strong, the Puritans might well find sufficient authority for -removing from Westminster Abbey the images of the Virgin, which, in -their opinion, had been worshipped, and before which lamps had been -perpetually burned. If we can imagine an English king breaking to -pieces the shrine of the Confessor in the Abbey, or a French king -destroying the sacred ampulla of Rheims or the _goupillon_ of St. -Eligius, on the ground that many regarded them with superstitious -reverence, we may measure the effect produced by this startling act of -Puritan zeal on the part of Hezekiah. - -"And he called it _Nehushtan_." If this rendering--in which our A.V. and -R.V. follow the LXX. and the Vulgate--be correct, Hezekiah justified the -iconoclasm by a brilliant play of words.[490] The Hebrew words for "a -serpent" (_nachash_) and for brass (_nechosheth_) are closely akin to -each other; and the king showed his just estimate of the relic which had -been so shamefully abused by contemptuously designating it--as it was in -itself and apart from its sacred historic associations--"nehushtan," a -thing of brass. The rendering, however, is uncertain, for the phrase may -be impersonal--"one" or "they" called it Nehushtan[491]--in which case -the assonance had lost any ironic connotation.[492] - -For this act of purity of worship, and for other reasons, the -historian calls Hezekiah the best of all the kings of Judah, superior -alike to all his predecessors and all his successors. He regarded him -as coming up to the Deuteronomic ideal, and says that therefore "the -Lord was with him, and he prospered whithersoever he went forth." - -The date of this great reformation is rendered uncertain by the -impossibility of ascertaining the exact order of Isaiah's prophecies. -The most probable view is that it was gradual, and some of the king's -most effective measures may not have been carried out till after the -deliverance from Assyria. It is clear, however, that the wisdom of -Hezekiah and his counsellors began from the first to uplift Judah from -the degradation and decrepitude to which it had sunk under the reign of -Ahaz. The boy-king found a wretched state of affairs at his accession. -His father had bequeathed to him "an empty treasury, a ruined peasantry, -an unprotected frontier, and a shattered army";[493] but although he was -still the vassal of Assyria, he reverted to the ideas of his -great-grandfather Uzziah. He strengthened the city, and enabled it to -stand a siege by improving the water-supply. Of these labours we have, -in all probability, a most interesting confirmation in the inscription -by Hezekiah's engineers, discovered in 1880, on the rocky walls of the -subterranean tunnel (_siloh_) between the spring of Gihon and the Pool -of Siloam.[494] He encouraged agriculture, the storage of produce, and -the proper tendance of flocks and herds, so that he acquired wealth -which dimly reminded men of the days of Solomon. - -There is little doubt that he early meditated revolt from Assyria; for -renewed faithfulness to Jehovah had elevated the moral tone, and -therefore the courage and hopefulness, of the whole people. The -Forty-Sixth Psalm, whatever may be its date, expresses the invincible -spirit of a nation which in its penitence and self-purification began -to feel itself irresistible, and could sing:-- - - "God is our hope and strength, - A very present help in trouble. - Therefore will we not fear, though the earth be moved, - Though the hills be carried into the midst of the sea. - There is a river, the streams whereof make glad the city of - God, - The Holy City where dwells the Most High. - God is in the midst of her; therefore shall she not be - shaken: - God shall help her, and that right early. - Heathens raged and kingdoms trembled: - He lifted His voice--the earth melted away. - Jehovah of Hosts is with us; - Elohim of Jacob is our refuge."[495] - -It was no doubt the spirit of renewed confidence which led Hezekiah to -undertake his one military enterprise--the chastisement of the -long-troublesome Philistines. He was entirely successful. He not only -won back the cities which his father had lost,[496] but he also -dispossessed them of their own cities, even unto Gaza, which was their -southernmost possession--"from the tower of the watchman to the fenced -city."[497] There can be no doubt that this act involved an almost open -defiance of the Assyrian King; but if Hezekiah dreamed of independence, -it was essential for him to be free from the raids and the menace of a -neighbour so dangerous as Philistia, and so inveterately hostile. It is -not improbable that he may have devoted to this war the money which -would otherwise have gone to pay the tribute to Shalmaneser or Sargon, -which had been continued since the date of the appeal of Ahaz to -Tiglath-Pileser II. When Sargon applied for the tribute Hezekiah refused -it, and even omitted to send the customary present. - -It is clear that in this line of conduct the king was following the -exhortations of Isaiah. It showed no small firmness of character that -he was able to choose a decided course amid the chaos of contending -counsels. Nothing but a most heroic courage could have enabled him, at -any period of his reign, to defy that dark cloud of Assyrian war which -ever loomed on the horizon, and from which but little sufficed to -elicit the destructive lightning-flash. - -There were three permanent parties in the Court of Hezekiah, each -incessantly trying to sway the king to its own counsels, and each -representing those counsels as indispensable to the happiness, and -even to the existence, of the State. - -I. There was the Assyrian party, urging with natural vehemence that -the fierce northern king was as irresistible in power as he was -terrible in vengeance. The fearful cruelties which had been committed -at Beth-Arbel, the devastation and misery of the Trans-Jordanic -tribes, the obliteration and deportation of the heavily afflicted -districts of Zebulon, Naphtali, and the way of the sea in Galilee of -the nations, the already inevitable and imminent destruction of -Samaria and her king and the whole Northern Kingdom, together with -that certain deportation of its inhabitants of which the fatal policy -had been established by Tiglath-Pileser, would constitute weighty -arguments against resistance. Such considerations would appeal -powerfully to the panic of the despondent section of the community, -which was only actuated, as most men are, by considerations of -ordinary political expediency. The foul apparition of the Ninevites, -which for five centuries afflicted the nations, is now only visible to -us in the bas-reliefs and inscriptions unearthed from their burnt -palaces. There they live before us in their own sculptures, with their -"thickset, sensual figures," and the expression of calm and settled -ferocity on their faces, exhibiting a frightful nonchalance as they -look on at the infliction of diabolical atrocities upon their -vanquished enemies. But in the eighth century before Christ they were -visible to all the eastern world in the exuberance of the most brutal -parts of the nature of man. Men had heard how, a century earlier, -Assurnazipal boasted that he had "dyed the mountains of the Nairi with -blood like wool"; how he had flayed captive kings alive, and dressed -pillars with their skins; how he had walled up others alive, or -impaled them on stakes; how he had burnt boys and girls alive, put out -eyes, cut off hands, feet, ears, and noses, pulled out the tongues of -his enemies, and "at the command of Assur his god" had flung their -limbs to vultures and eagles, to dogs and bears. The Jews, too, must -have realised with a vividness which is to us impossible the cruel -nature of the usurper Sargon. He is represented on his monuments as -putting out with his own hands the eyes of his miserable captives; -while, to prevent them from flinching when the spear which he holds in -his hand is plunged into their eye-sockets, a hook is inserted -through their nose and lips and held fast with a bridle. Can we not -imagine the pathos with which this party would depict such horrors to -the tremblers of Judah? Would they not bewail the fanaticism which led -the prophets to seduce their king into the suicidal policy of defying -such a power? To these men the sole path of national safety lay in -continuing to be quiet vassals and faithful tributaries of these -destroyers of cities and treaders-down of foes. - -II. Then there was the Egyptian party, headed probably by the powerful -Shebna, the chancellor.[498] His foreign name, the fact that his -father is not mentioned, and the question of Isaiah--"What hast thou -here? and whom hast thou here, that thou hast hewed thee out a -sepulchre here?"--seem to indicate that he was by birth a foreigner, -perhaps a Syrian.[499] The prophet, indignant at his powerful -interference with domestic politics, threatens him, in words of -tremendous energy, with exile and degradation.[500] He lost his place -of chancellor, and we next find him in the inferior, though still -honourable, office of secretary (_sopher_, 2 Kings xviii. 18), while -Eliakim had been promoted to his vacant place (Isa. xxii. 21). Perhaps -he may have afterwards repented, and the doom have been -lightened.[501] Circumstances at any rate reduced him from the -scornful spirit which seems to have marked his earlier opposition to -the prophetic counsels, and perhaps the powerful warning and menace of -Isaiah may have exercised an influence on his mind. - -III. The third party, if it could even be called a party, was that of -Isaiah and a few of the faithful, aided no doubt by the influence of -the prophecies of Micah. Their attitude to both the other parties was -antagonistic. - -i. As regards the Assyrian, they did not attempt to minimise the -danger. They represented the peril from the kingdom of Nineveh as -God's appointed scourge for the transgressions of Judah, as it had -been for the transgressions of Israel. - -Thus Micah sees in imagination the terrible march of the invader by -Gath, Akko, Beth-le-Aphrah, Maroth, Lachish, and Adullam. He plays with -bitter anguish on the name of each town as an omen of humiliation and -ruin, and calls on Zion to make herself bald for the children of her -delight, and to enlarge her baldness as the vultures, because they are -gone into captivity.[502] He turns fiercely on the greedy grandees, the -false prophets, the blood-stained princes, the hireling priests, the -bribe-taking soothsayers, who were responsible for the guilt which -should draw down the vengeance. He ends with the fearful prophecy--which -struck a chill into men's hearts a century later, and had an important -influence on Jewish history--"Therefore, because of you shall Zion be -ploughed as a field, and Jerusalem become ruins, and the hill of the -Temple as heights in the wood";--though there should be an ultimate -deliverance from Migdal-Eder, and a remnant should be saved.[503] - -Similar to Micah's, and possibly not uninfluenced by it, is Isaiah's -imaginary picture of the march of Assyria, which must have been full -of terror to the poor inhabitants of Jerusalem.[504] - - "He is come to Aiath! - He is passed through Migron! - At Michmash he layeth up his baggage: - They are gone over the pass: - 'Geba,' they cry, 'is our lodging.' - Ramah trembleth: - Gibeah of Saul is fled! - Raise thy shrill cries, O daughter of Gallim! - Hearken, O Laishah! Answer her, O Anathoth! - Madmenah is in wild flight (?). - The inhabitants of Gebim gather their stuff to flee. - This very day shall he halt at Nob. - He shaketh his hand at the mount of the daughter of Zion, - The hill of Jerusalem." - -Yet Isaiah, and the little band of prophets, in spite of their perils, -did _not_ share the views of the Assyrian party or counsel submission. -On the contrary, even as they contemplate in imagination this terrific -march of Sargon, they threaten Assyria. The Assyrian might smite Judah, -but God should smite the Assyrians. He boasts that he will rifle the -riches of the people as one robs the eggs of a trembling bird, which -does not dare to cheep or move the wing.[505] But Isaiah tells him that -he is but the axe boasting against the hewer, and the wooden staff -lifting itself up against its wielder. Burning should be scattered over -his glory. The Lord of hosts should lop his boughs with terror, and a -mighty one should hew down the crashing forest of his haughty Lebanon. - -ii. Still more indignant were the true prophets against those who -trusted in an alliance with Egypt. From first to last Isaiah warned -Ahaz, and warned Hezekiah, that no reliance was to be placed on -Egyptian promises--that Egypt was but like the reed of his own Nile. -He mocked the hopes placed on Egyptian intervention as being no less -sure of disannulment than a covenant with death and an agreement with -Sheol. This rebellious reliance on the shadow of Egypt was but the -weaving of an unrighteous web, and the adding of sin to sin. It should -lead to nothing but shame and confusion, and the Jewish ambassadors to -Zoan and Egypt should only have to blush for a people that could -neither help nor profit. And then branding Egypt with the old -insulting name of Rahab, or "Blusterer," he says,-- - - "Egypt helpeth in vain, and to no purpose. - Therefore have I called her 'Rahab, that sitteth still.'" - -Indolent braggart--that was the only designation which she deserved! -Intrigue and braggadocio--smoke and lukewarm water,--this was all -which could be expected from _her_![506] - -Such teaching was eminently distasteful to the worldly politicians, -who regarded faith in Jehovah's intervention as no better than -ridiculous fanaticism, and forgot God's wisdom in the inflated -self-satisfaction of their own. The priests--luxurious, drunken, -scornful--were naturally with them. Men were fine and stylish, and in -their religious criticisms could not express too lofty a contempt for -any one who, like Isaiah, was too sincere to care for the mere -polishing of phrases, and too much in earnest to shrink from -reiteration. In their self-indulgent banquets these sleek, smug -euphemists made themselves very merry over Isaiah's simplicity, -reiteration, and directness of expression. With hiccoughing insolence -they asked whether they were to be treated like weaned babes; and then -wagging their heads, as their successors did at Christ upon the cross, -they indulged themselves in a mimicry, which they regarded as witty, -of Isaiah's style and manner. With him they said it is all,-- - - "Tsav-la-tsav, tsav-la-tsav, - Quav-la-quav, quav-la-quav, - Z'eir sham, Z'eir sham!"-- - -which may be imitated thus:--With him it is always "Bit and bit, bid -and bid, for-bid and for-bid, for_bid_ and for_bid_, a lit-tle bit -here, a lit-tle bit there."[507] Monosyllable is heaped on -monosyllable; and no doubt the speakers tipsily adopted the tones of -fond mothers addressing their babes and weanlings. Using the Hebrew -words, one of these shameless roysterers would say, "_Tsav-la-tsav, -tsav-la-tsav, quav-la-quav, quav-la-quav, Z'eir sham, Z'eir -sham_,--that is how that simpleton Isaiah speaks." And then doubtless -a drunken laugh would go round the table, and half a dozen of them -would be saying thus, "_Tsav-la-tsav, tsav-la-tsav_," at once. They -derided Isaiah just as the philosophers of Athens derided St. Paul--as -a mere _spermologos_, "a seed-pecker!"[508] or "picker-up of -learning's crumbs." Is all this petty monosyllabism fit teaching for -persons like us? Are we to be taught by copybooks? Do we need the -censorship of this Old Morality? - -On whom, full of the fire of God, Isaiah turned, and told these -scornful tipsters, who lorded it over God's heritage in Jerusalem, -that, since they disdained his stammerings, God would teach them by -men of strange lips and alien tongue. They might mimic the style of -the Assyrians also if they liked; but they should fall backward, and -be broken, and snared, and taken.[509] - -It must not be forgotten that the struggle of the prophets against these -parties was far more severe than we might suppose. The politicians of -expediency had supporters among the leading princes. The priests--whom -the prophets so constantly and sternly denounce--adhered to them; and, -as usual, the women were all of the priestly party (comp. Isa. xxxii. -9-20). The king, indeed, was inclined to side with his prophet, but the -king was terribly overshadowed by a powerful and worldly aristocracy, of -which the influence was almost always on the side of luxury, idolatry, -and oppression. - -iii. But what had Isaiah to offer in the place of the policy of these -worldly and sacerdotal advisers of the king? It was the simple command -"Trust in the Lord." It was the threefold message "God is high; God -is near; God is Love."[510] Had he not told Ahaz not to fear the -"stumps of two smouldering torches," when Rezin and Pekah seemed -awfully dangerous to Judah? So he tells them now that, though their -sins had necessitated the rushing stroke of Assyrian judgment, Zion -should not be utterly destroyed. In Isaiah "the calmness requisite for -sagacity rose from faith." Mr. Bagehot might have appealed to Isaiah's -whole policy in illustration of what he has so well described as the -military and political benefits of religion. Monotheism is of -advantage to men not only "by reason of the high concentration of -steady feeling which it produces, but also for the mental calmness and -sagacity which surely springs from a pure and vivid conviction that -the Lord reigneth."[511] Isaiah's whole conviction might have been -summed up in the name of the king himself: "Jehovah maketh strong." - -King Hezekiah, apparently not a man of much personal force, though of -sincere piety, was naturally distracted by the counsels of these three -parties: and who can judge him severely if, beset with such terrific -dangers, he occasionally wavered, now to one side, now to the other? -On the whole, it is clear that he was wise and faithful, and deserves -the high eulogy that his faith failed not. Naturally he had not within -his soul that burning light of inspiration which made Isaiah so sure -that, even though clouds and darkness might lower on every side, God -was an eternal Sun, which flamed for ever in the zenith, even when not -visible to any eye save that of Faith. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[480] The first of these dates is highly uncertain, as is the entire -chronology of this reign. I follow Kittel. - -[481] 2 Chron. xxxi. 2-21. - -[482] Josiah did this many years later (2 Kings xxiii. 13). - -[483] Gen. xxxv. 14. See Spencer, _De legg. Hebr._, i. 444; Bochart, -_Canaan_, ii. 2. - -[484] Exod. xxiv. 4. Comp. Deut. vii. 5, xii. 3, xvi. 22; Lev. xxvi. -1; 2 Chron. xiv. 3, xxxi. 1; Jer. xliii. 13; Hos. x. 2; Mic. v. 13 -(where the A.V. often has "statue" or "image"). Comp. Clem. Alex., -_Strom._, i. 24; Arnob., _c. Gent._, i. 39. - -[485] The rendering "grove" in the A.V. is borrowed from the [Greek: -alsos] of the LXX., and the _lucus_ of the Vulgate. On the connection -of the Asherah with the sacred tree of the Assyrian, see my article on -"Grove" in Smith's _Dict. of the Bible_; and Fergusson, _Nineveh and -Persepolis Restored_, 299-304. On the worship of Asherah, see 1 Kings -xv. 13; 2 Kings xxi. 3-7, xxiii. 4; 2 Chron. xv. 16; Judg. iii. 5-7, -vi. 25, xviii. 18. Baudissin in _Herzog Realencykl._, _s.v._ We may -well be startled by the prevalence of idolatry in Jerusalem revealed -in Isa. x. 11, xxvii. 9, xxix. 11, xxx. 9, 22, etc. - -[486] See Wellhausen, _Hist._, 235; Stade, _Gesch. d. V. I._, 460; W. -R. Smith, _Religion of the Semites_, 171; Cheyne, _Isaiah_, ii. 303; -Renan, _Hist. du Peuple d'Israel_, i. 230 (Prof. Driver, _Bibl. -Dict._, i. 258, 2nd edition). - -[487] _Hierozoicon_, ii. 3, 13. - -[488] Jer. xliv. 17. In the collection of antiquities of Baron -Ustinoff at Jaffa are five or six dragon-headed serpents, with ears of -copper and hollow inside. They are ancient, and were perhaps used as -talismanic copies of Nehushtan. - -[489] If this was a genuine relic, it must have been nearly eight -hundred years old. It is never mentioned elsewhere. - -[490] [Hebrew: nechushtan], "a brazen thing." The king certainly showed -a horror of sacerdotal imposture and religious materialism. Yet Renan -argues, from Isa. x. 11, xxvii. 9, xxx. 9, 22, that he must have had a -certain amount of tolerance. See _Hist. du Peuple d'Israel_, iii. 30. - -[491] 2 Kings xviii. 4. _Vayyikra_ is like the English indefinite -plural. The impersonal rendering (as in other passages) is adopted in -the Targum of Jonathan, the Peshito, etc., and by Luther, Bunsen, -Ewald, and most moderns. - -[492] This relic is still shown in the Church of St. Ambrose at Milan. -It used to be the popular notion that it would hiss at the end of the -world. The history of the Milan "relic" is that a Milanese envoy to -the court of the Emperor John Zimisces at Constantinople chose it from -the imperial treasures, being assured that it was made of the same -metal that Hezekiah had broken up (Sigonius, _Hist. Regn. Ital._, -vii.). It is probably a symbol used by some ophite sect. See Dean -Plumptre, _Dict. of Bibl._, _s.v._ "Serpent." - -[493] 2 Kings xvi. 8; Driver, _Isaiah_, 68. - -[494] The diverting of the water-courses enabled him to bring the water -into the city by a subterranean tunnel. The Saracens took a similar -precaution (Gul. Tyr., viii. 7). See Appendix II., where the inscription -is given; and compare 2 Chron. xxxii. 30. Apparently it carried the -water of Gihon to the south-east gate, where were the king's gardens. -Ecclus. xlviii. 17: "Ezekias fortified his city, and brought in water -into the midst thereof: he digged the hard rock with iron, and made -wells for water." For "water" the MSS. read "Gog," a corruption probably -for [Greek: aggon], "a conduit" (Geiger) or "Gihon" (Fritzsche). - -[495] Psalm xlvi. 1-11. - -[496] 2 Chron. xxviii. 18. - -[497] 2 Kings xviii. 8: comp. xvii. 9. Josephus says that he failed to -take Gath (_Antt._, IX. xiii. 3). - -[498] A.V., "treasurer" (_soken_; lit., "deputy" or "associate": Isa. -xxii. 15). He was "over the household." The Egyptian alliance had for -Judah, as Renan points out, some of the fascination that a Russian -alliance has often had for troubled spirits in France (_Hist. du -Peuple d'Israel_, iii. 12). - -[499] Renan says that he may have been a Sebennyite, and his name -Sebent. - -[500] Isa. xxii. 17, 18: "Behold, the Lord shall sling and sling, and -pack and pack, and toss and toss thee away like a ball into a distant -land; and there thou shalt die" (Stanley). The versions vary -considerably. - -[501] Isa. xxxvii. 2. There can be little doubt that there were not -_two_ Shebnas. - -[502] Mic. i. 10-16. See the writer's _Minor Prophets_ ("Men of the -Bible" Series), pp. 130-133, for an explanation of this enigmatic -prophecy. - -[503] Jer. xxvi. 8-24. He tells us that the prophecy was delivered in -the reign of Hezekiah. See my _Minor Prophets_, pp. 123-140. - -[504] Isa. x. 28-32. It would involve a cross-country route over -several deep ravines--_e.g._, the Wady Suweinit, near Michmash. In 1 -Sam. xiv. 2, Thenius, for "Migron," reads "the Precipice." Some take -Aiath for Ai, three miles south of Bethel. Renan says (_Hist. du -Peuple d'Israel_, iii.): "Nom d'Anathoth, arrang symboliquement." - -[505] Isa. x. 14. The metaphor of a bird's nest occurs more than once -in the boastful Assyrian records. - -[506] Isa. xxx. 1-7. Rahab means "fierceness," "insolence." For the -various uses of the word, see Job xxvi. 12; Isa. li. 9, 10, 15; Psalm -lxxxix. 9, 10, lxxxvii. 4, 5. - -[507] See Dr. S. Cox (_Expositor_, i. 98-104) on Isa. xxviii. 7-13. - -[508] Acts xvii. 18. - -[509] Isa. xxviii. 7-22. - -[510] Professor Smith, _Isaiah_, i. 12. - -[511] Bagehot, _Physics and Politics_, p. 73; Smith, _Isaiah_, 109. - - - - - CHAPTER XXVI - - _HEZEKIAH'S SICKNESS, AND THE EMBASSY FROM - BABYLON_ - - 2 KINGS xx. 1-19 - - "Thou hast loved me out of the pit of nothingness."--ISA. xxxviii. - 17 (A.V., margin). - - "See the shadow of the dial - In the lot of every one - Marks the passing of the trial, - Proves the presence of the Sun." - E. B. BROWNING. - - -In the chaos of uncertainties which surrounds the chronology of King -Hezekiah's reign, it is impossible to fix a precise date to the -sickness which almost brought him to the grave. It has, however, been -conjectured by some Assyriologists that the story of this episode has -been displaced, because it seemed to break the continuity of the -narrative of the Assyrian invasion; and that, though it is placed in -the Book of Kings after the deliverance from Sennacherib, it really -followed the earlier incursion of Sargon. This is rendered more -probable by Isaiah's promise (2 Kings xx. 6), "I will deliver thee and -this city out of the hand of the King of Assyria," and by the fact -that Hezekiah still possessed such numerous and splendid treasures to -display to the ambassadors of Merodach-Baladan. This could hardly have -been the case after he had been forced to pay a fine to the King of -Assyria of all the silver that was found in the house of the Lord, and -in the treasures of the king's house, to cut off the gold from the -doors and pillars of the Temple, and even to send as captives to -Nineveh some of his wives, and of the eunuchs of his palace.[512] The -date "in those days" (2 Kings xx. 1) is vague and elastic, and may -apply to any time before or after the great invasion. - -He was sick unto death. The only indication which we have of the -nature of his illness is that it took the form of a carbuncle or -imposthume,[513] which could be locally treated, but which, in days of -very imperfect therapeutic knowledge, might easily end in death, -especially if it were on the back of the neck. The conjecture of -Witsius and others that it was a form of the plague which they suppose -to have caused the disaster to the Assyrian army has nothing whatever -to recommend it. - -Seeing the fatal character of his illness, Isaiah came to the king -with the dark message, "Set thine house in order; for thou shalt die, -and not live." - -The message is interesting as furnishing yet another proof that even -the most positive announcements of the prophets were, and were always -meant to be, to some extent hypothetical and dependent on unexpressed -conditions. This was the case with the famous prophecy of Micah that -Zion should be ploughed down into a heap of ruins. It was never -fulfilled; yet the prophet lost none of his authority, for it was well -understood that the doom which would otherwise have been carried out -had been averted by timely penitence. - -But the message of Isaiah fell with terrible anguish on the heart of -the suffering king. He had hoped for a better fate. He had begun a -great religious reformation. He had uplifted his people, at least in -part, out of the moral slough into which they had fallen in the days -of his predecessor. He had inspired into his threatened capital -something of his own faith and courage. Surely he, if any man, might -claim the old promises which Jehovah in His loving-kindness and truth -had sworn to his father David and his father Abraham, that he being -delivered out of the hand of his enemies should serve God without -fear, walking in holiness and righteousness before Him all the days of -his life. He was but a young man still--perhaps not yet thirty years -old; further, not only would he leave behind him an unfinished work, -but he was childless,[514] and therefore it seemed as if with him -would end the direct line of the house of David, heir to so many -precious promises. He has left us--it is preserved in the Book of -Isaiah--the poem which he wrote on his recovery, but which enshrines -the emotion of his agonising anticipations[515]:-- - - "I said, In the noontide of my days I shall go into the gates of - Sheol. - I am deprived of the residue of my years. - I said, I shall not see Yah, Yah, in the land of the living, - I shall behold no man more, when I am among them that cease to be. - Mine habitation is removed, and is carried away from me like a - shepherd's tent. - Like a weaver I have rolled up my life; he will cut me from the - thrum. - - * * * * * - - Like a swallow or a crane, so did I chatter; - I did mourn as a dove; mine eyes fail with looking upward. - O Lord, I am oppressed; be Thou my surety." - -We must remember, as we contemplate his utter prostration of soul, -that he was not blessed, as we are, with the sure and certain hope of -the resurrection to eternal life. All was dim and dark, to him in the -shadowy world of _eidola_ beyond the grave, and many a century was to -elapse before Christ brought life and immortality to light. To enter -Sheol meant to Hezekiah to pass beyond the cheerful sunshine of earth -and the felt presence of God. No more worship, no more gladness there! - - "For Sheol cannot praise Thee, Death cannot celebrate Thee; - They that go down into the pit cannot hope for Thy truth." - -On every ground, therefore, the feelings of Hezekiah, had he not been a -worshipper of God, might have been like those of Mycerinus, and, like -that legendary Egyptian king, he might have cursed God before he died. - - "My father loved injustice, and lived long; - I loved the good he scorned and hated wrong-- - The gods declare my recompense to-day. - I looked for life more lasting, rule more high; - And when six years are measured, lo, I die! - Yet surely, O my people, did I ween - Man's justice from the all-just gods was given, - A light that from some upper point did beam, - Some better archetype whose seat was heaven: - A light that, shining from the blest abodes, - Did shadow somewhat of the life of gods." - -The indignation of Mycerinus often finds an echo on Pagan tombstones, -as in the famous epitaph on the grave of the girl Procope:-- - - "I, Procope, lift up my hands against the gods, - Who took me hence undeserving, - Aged nineteen years." - -It was far otherwise with Hezekiah. There was anguish in his heart, -but no rebellion or defiance. He wept sore; he turned his face to the -wall and wept;[516] but as he wept he also prayed, and said,-- - -"O Lord, remember now how I have walked before Thee in truth, and with -a perfect heart, and have done that which is good in Thy sight." - -Isaiah, after delivering his dark message, and doubtless adding to it -such words of human consolation as were possible--if under such -circumstances any were possible--had left the king's chamber. On every -ground his feelings must have been almost as overwhelmed with sorrow as -those of the king. Hezekiah was personally his friend, and the hope of -his nation. Doubtless the prophet's prayers rose as fervently and as -effectually as those of Luther, which snatched his friend Melanchthon -back from the very gates of death. By the time that he had reached the -middle of the court,[517] he felt borne in upon him, by that Divine -intuition which constituted his prophetic call, the certainty that God -would withdraw the immediate doom which he had been commissioned to -announce. It has been conjectured by some that the conviction was -deepened in his mind by observing on the steps of Ahaz one of those -remarkable but rare effects of refraction--or, as some have conjectured, -of a solar eclipse, involving an obscuration of the upper limb of the -sun--which had seemed to take the advancing shadow ten steps backwards; -and that this was to him a sign from heaven of the promise of God and -the prolongation of the king's life. Awestruck and glad, he hastened -back into the presence of the dying king with the life-giving message -that God had heard his prayer, and seen his tears, and would add fifteen -years to his life, and would defend him, and deliver him and Jerusalem -out of the hand of the King of Assyria. And this should be the sign to -him from Jehovah--Jehovah would bring again the shadow ten steps up the -stairs of Ahaz. To this sign--if it was visible from the -chamber-window--he called the attention of the astonished king.[518] - -We here naturally follow the narrative of Isaiah himself, as more -authoritative than that of the historian of the Kings as to details in -which they differ.[519] Not only is it quite in accordance with all -that we know of history that slight variations should occur in the -traditions of long-past times, but the text of the Book of Kings -suggests some difficulty. There we read that Hezekiah asked Isaiah -what should be the sign of the promise--not mentioned in Isaiah--that -he should go up to the House of the Lord the third day. Isaiah then -asked him whether the sign should be that the shadow should advance -ten steps, or recede ten steps. But there is no interrogation in the -Hebrew, which rather means, "The shadow hath advanced ten steps ... if -it shall recede ten steps?" or if we insert the interrogation in the -first clause, "Hath the shadow advanced ten steps?"[520] The king's -natural answer to so strange an alternative would be that for the -shadow to advance ten steps was nothing; whereas its retrogression -would be a sign indeed. Then Isaiah cried unto Jehovah, and the shadow -went backward. In the obvious divergence of details we naturally -follow Isaiah himself; and if it be a true and understood rule of all -theology, "_Miracula non sunt multiplicanda prter necessitatem_," the -miracle in this case--in the opportuneness of its occurrence, and the -issues which it inspired--was none the less a miracle because it was -carried out in direct accordance with God's unseen, perpetual, -miraculous Providence, which none but unbelievers will nickname -Chance. That we are here dealing with an historic incident is certain; -and they who see and acknowledge God in all history find no difficulty -at all in seeing His dealings with men in striking interpositions. But -these, by the analogy of His whole Divine economy, would naturally be -out in accordance with natural laws. - -The words rendered "the sun-dial of Ahaz" mean no more than "the steps -[_ma'aloth_] of Ahaz." Ahaz evidently was a king of sthetic tastes, -who was fond of introducing foreign novelties and curiosities into -Jerusalem.[521] Steps, with a staff on the top of them as a gnomon, to -serve as sun-dials had been invented at Babylon, and Ahaz may probably -have become acquainted with their form and use when he paid his visit to -Tiglath-Pileser at Damascus. No one could blame him--it was indeed a -meritorious act--to introduce to his people so useful an invention. The -word "hour" first occurs in Dan. iii. 6, and it was doubtless from -Babylon that the Hebrews borrowed the division of days into hours. This -is the earliest instance in the Bible of the mention of any instrument -to measure time. That the recession of the shadow could be caused by -refraction is certain, for it has been observed in modern days. Thus, as -is mentioned by Rosenmller, on March 27th, 1703, Pre Romauld, prior of -the monastery at Metz, noticed that the shadow on his dial deviated an -hour and a half, owing to refraction in the higher regions of the -atmosphere.[522] Or again, according to Mr. Bosanquet, the same effect -might have been produced by the darkening shadow of an eclipse. But -while he appealed to Divine indications the great prophet did not -neglect natural remedies. He ordered that a cake of figs should be laid -on the imposthume. It was a recognised and an efficient remedy, still -recommended, centuries later, by Dioscorides, by Pliny, and by St. -Jerome. By God's blessing on man's therapeutic care, the king was -speedily rescued from the gates of death. Constantly in Scripture what -we call the miraculous and what we call the providential are mingled -together. To those who regard the providential as a constant miracle, -the question of the miraculous becomes subordinate.[523] - -With intense joy and gratitude the king hailed the respite which God -had granted him. In fifteen years much might be done, much might be -hoped for. All this he acknowledged with deep feeling in the song -which he wrote on his recovery. - - "I shall go as in solemn procession[524] all my years because of the - bitterness of my soul. - O Lord, by these things men live, - And wholly therein is the life of my spirit. - Behold, it was for my peace that I had great bitterness; - But Thou hast loved my soul from the pit of nothingness: - For Thou hast cast all my sins behind Thy back. - - * * * * * - - The Lord is ready to save me; - Therefore will we sing my songs to the stringed instruments - All the days of our life in the house of the Lord."[525] - -"The wonder done in the land" was, according to the Chronicler, one of -the grounds for the embassy which, after his recovery, Hezekiah -received from Merodach-Baladan, the patriot prince of Babylon. The -other ostensible object of the embassy was to send letters and a -present in congratulation for the king's restoration to health. But -the real object lay deeper, out of sight. It was to secure a southern -alliance for Babylon against the incessant tyranny of Nineveh. - -Merodach-Baladan is mentioned in the inscriptions of Sargon.[526] He -is described as "Merodach-Baladan, son of Baladan, King of Sumr and -Accad, king of the four countries, and conqueror of all his enemies." -There had been long struggles, lasting indeed for centuries, between -the city on the Euphrates and the city on the Tigris. Sometimes one, -sometimes the other, had been victorious. Babylon--on the monuments -Kur-Dunyash--had its original Accadian name of Ca-dinirra, which, like -its Semitic equivalent Bal-el, means "Gate of God." Kalah (Larissa and -Birs Nimroud) had been built by Shalmaneser I. before B.C. 1300. His -son conquered Babylon, but not permanently; for in some later raid the -Babylonians got possession of his signet-ring, with its proud -inscription, "Conqueror of Kur-Dunyash," and it was not recovered by -the Assyrians till six centuries later, when it fell into the hands of -Sennacherib. About 1150 Nebuchadrezzar I. of Babylon thrice invaded -Assyria, but there was again peace and alliance in 1100. -Merodach-Baladan I. reigned before 900. The king who now sought the -friendship of Hezekiah was the second of the name. He seized or -recovered the throne of Babylon in 721, after the death of -Shalmaneser, perhaps because Sargon was a usurper of dubious descent. -He helped the Elamites against Assyria. Sargon was compelled to -retreat to Assyria, but returned in 712, and drove Merodach-Baladan to -flight. He was captured and taken to Assyria. But on the murder of -Sargon in 705, he again managed to seize the throne of Babylon, killed -the viceroy who had been set up, and became king for six months. After -this, Sennacherib invaded his country, defeated him, and drove him -once more to flight. He was perhaps killed by his successor. - -Whether his overtures to Hezekiah took place before his defeat by -Sargon, or after his escape, is uncertain. In either case he doubtless -sent a splendid embassy, for Babylon was far-famed for its golden -magnificence as "the glory of kingdoms" and "the beauty of the -Chaldees' excellency."[527] At that time the Jews knew but little of -the far-off city which was destined to be so closely interwoven with -their future fortunes, as it was mingled with their oldest and dimmest -traditions.[528] Apart from the magnificence of the presents brought -to him, it was not unnatural that Hezekiah should regard this embassy -with intense satisfaction. It was flattering to the power of his -little kingdom that its alliance should be sought by the far-off and -powerful capital on the great river;[529] it was still more -encouraging to know that the frightful Nineveh had a strong enemy not -far from her own frontier. Merodach-Baladan's ambassadors would be -sure to inform Hezekiah that their lord had flung off the authority of -Sargon, had kept him at bay for many years, and was still the -undisputed king of the dominions snatched from the common enemy. It -might have seemed reasonable that Hezekiah, for his part, should -desire to leave the most favourable impression of his wealth and power -on the mind of his distant and magnificent ally. He "hearkened unto" -the ambassadors, or, more properly, "he was glad of them" (R.V.),[530] -and "showed them all the house of his spicery and other treasures, his -precious unguents, his armoury, his bullion, plate, and the whole -resources of his kingdom." The Chronicler regards this as ingratitude -to God. He says that "Hezekiah rendered not again according unto the -benefits done unto him; for his heart was lifted up: therefore there -was wrath upon him, and upon Judah and Jerusalem." It is a severe -judgment of later times, and the historian of the Kings pronounces no -such censure. Nevertheless, he records the stern sentence pronounced -by Isaiah. The prophet had seen through the secret diplomacy of the -Babylonian ambassadors, and knew that the real object of their mission -was to induce his king to revolt against Assyria in reliance on an arm -of flesh. He came to ask Hezekiah whose these men were, whence they -came, and what they had said. The king told him who they were, and how -he had received them; but he did not think it wise to reveal their -secret proposals. If Isaiah had so vehemently reproved all -negotiations with Egypt, there was little probability that he would -sanction the overtures of Babylon. He saw in Hezekiah's conduct a vein -of ostentatious elation, a swerving from theocratic faith; and with -remarkable prophetic insight convinced the king of the error and -impolicy of his proceedings, by announcing that the final and, in -fact, irrevocable captivity of Judah would ultimately come, not from -Nineveh, the fierce enemy, whose cloud of war was lurid on the -horizon, but from Babylon, the apparently weaker friend, who was now -making overtures of amity. With what heartrending grief must the king -have heard the doom that the display of his treasures would prove to -be in the future an incentive to the cupidity of the kings of Babylon, -and that they would sweep away all those precious things to the banks -of the Euphrates with such final overthrow that even the descendants -of David should be sunk to the infinite degradation of being eunuchs -in the palace of the King of Babylon.[531] The doom seems to have been -fulfilled in part in the reign of Hezekiah's son, and more fearfully -in the days of his great-grandchildren.[532] - -The king's pride was humbled to the dust. In the spirit of Job--"The -Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the -Lord"[533]--he resigned himself without a murmur to the will of -Heaven, and exclaimed that all which God did must be well done. At -least God granted him a respite. Peace and truth would be in his own -days; for that let him be thankful. They were words of humble -resignation, uttered by one who had learnt to believe that whatever -God decreed was just and right. - -It would be unjust to measure the feelings of those far centuries by -those of our own day, and there was none of the gross selfishness in -the words of Hezekiah which led Nero to quote the line-- - - "When I am dead, let earth be mixed with fire"; - -or which led Louis XIV. to say-- - - "Aprs moi le dluge." - -We may perhaps trace in his exclamation something of the fatalism -which gives a touch of apathy to the submissiveness of the Oriental. -Some, too, have imagined that his distress was tinged by a gleam of -happiness at the implicit promise that he should have a son. His -wife's name was Hephzibah ("My delight is in her"), and within two -years she brought forth the firstborn son, whose career, indeed, was -dark and evil, but who became in due time an ancestor of the promised -Messiah. The name "Manasseh" given him by his parents recalled the -child born to Joseph in the land of his exile who had caused him to -forget his sorrows.[534] Hezekiah had the spirit which says,-- - - "That which Thou blessest is most good, - And unblest good is ill; - And all is right which seems most wrong, - So it be Thy sweet will." - - -FOOTNOTES: - -[512] One of the first to point out the _necessary_ rearrangement of -the events of Hezekiah's reign was Dr. Hincks, in his paper on "A -Rectification of Chronology which the newly discovered Apis-stls -render necessary" (_Journ. of Sacred Lit._, October 1858). See my -article on Hezekiah, Smith, _Dict. of the Bible_, 2nd ed., ii. 1251. - -[513] Heb., _sh'chn_; LXX., [Greek: helkos]; Vulg., _ulcus_. - -[514] The Rabbis even make his sickness the punishment for his having -neglected to secure an heir. He pleads that he foresaw the wickedness -of his son. Isaiah tells him not to try to forestall God (_Berachoth_, -f. 10, 1). - -[515] Isa. xxxviii. 10-20. - -[516] Comp. 1 Kings xxi. 4 (Ahab). - -[517] 2 Kings xx. 4. The _Q'r_ or "read" text is, as here rendered, -_chatsee_ (comp. 1 Kings vii. 8), and is followed by the LXX. ([Greek: -en t aul t mes]), by the Vulgate (_mediam partem atrii_), and by the -A.V. The R.V., which adopts the Kethb or written text, _ha'r_, renders -it "the middle part of the city." If this be the true reading, it would -mean that Isaiah had gone some distance from the palace, and was now -perhaps in the Valley between the Upper and the Lower City. But it seems -not improbable that (1) "the steps of Ahaz" would be in the royal court, -and (2) the answer of God, like the mercy of Christ to the suffering, -may have come promptly as an echo to the appealing cry. - -[518] The LXX. calls "the stairs" [Greek: anabathmous tou oikou tou -patros sou], and so, too, Josephus (_Antt._, X. ii. 1). The Targum -calls them "an hour-stone." Symmachus has, [Greek: streps tn skian -tn grammn h kateb en hrologi Achaz]. - -[519] It should, however, be observed that on the question of priority -critics are divided. Grotius, Vitringa, Paulus, Drechsler, etc., -thought that the account in the Book of Isaiah is the original; De -Wette, Maurer, Koster, Winer, Driver, etc., regard that account as a -later abbreviation, perhaps from a common source. - -[520] See Professor Lumby, _ad loc._ - -[521] There is an exactly similar sun-dial not far from Delhi. - -[522] _Journ. of Asiatic Soc._, xv. 286-293. - -[523] Figs have a recognised use for imposthumes. See Dioscorides and -Pliny quoted in Celsius, _Hierobot._, ii. 373. In the passage of -_Berachoth_ quoted above, Hezekiah in his sickness asks Isaiah to give -him his daughter in marriage, that he may have an heir. Isaiah replies -that the decree of his death is irrevocable. The king bids Isaiah -depart, and says (quoting Job xiii. 15) that a man must not despair, -even if a sword is laid on his neck. - -[524] Comp. Psalm xlii. 4. - -[525] Isa. xxxviii. 10-20. - -[526] The Babylonian form of his name is Marduk-habal-iddi-na--_i.e._, -"Merodach gave a son." He is the Mardokempados of the _Ptolemaic -Canon_, and the second fragment of his reign (six months) is mentioned -by Polyhistor (_ap._ Euseb.). Josephus calls him Baladan (_Antt._, X. -ii. 2). He was originally the prince of the Chaldan _Bit Yakm_. -Sargon calls him "Merodach-Baladan, the foe, the perverse, who, -contrary to the will of the great gods, ruled as king at Babylon." He -displaced him for a time by "Belibus, the son of a wise man, whom one -had reared like a little dog" (as we might say "like a tame cat") "in -my palace" (Schrader, ii. 32). In the Assyrian records he is often -called (by mistake?) "the son of Yakim." For the adventures of the -Babylonian hero, see Schrader, _K. A. T._, 213 ff., 224 ff., 227, and -in Riehm, _Handwrterbuch_, ii. 982. - -[527] Isa. xiv. 4, xiii. 19. - -[528] Gen. x. 10, 11, xi. 1-9. - -[529] Jos., _Antt._, X. ii. 2: [Greek: Symmachon te auton einai -parekalei kai philon.] - -[530] 2 Kings xx. 13. LXX., [Greek: echar]. - -[531] See Dan. i. 6. - -[532] 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11. - -[533] Job i. 21. - -[534] Manasseh seems to mean "one who forgets." See Gen. xli. 51. It -was the name of the husband of Judith (Judith viii. 2), and is found -in Ezra x. 30, 33. - - - - - CHAPTER XXVII - - _HEZEKIAH AND ASSYRIA_ - - B.C. 701 - - 2 KINGS xviii. 13--xix. 37. - - [Greek: All' ho sophtatos basileus ouch hopla tais ekeinn - blasphmiais, alla proseuchn kai dakrya kai sakkon - antetaxen.]--THEODORET. - - "When, sudden--how think ye the end? - Did I say 'without friend'? - Say rather from marge to blue marge - The whole sky grew his targe, - With the sun's self for visible boss, - While an Arm ran across - Which the earth heaved beneath like a breast, - Where the wretch was safe pressed." - BROWNING. - - -Although during a few memorable scenes the relations of Judah with -Assyria in the reign of Hezekiah leap into fierce light, many previous -details are unfortunately left in the deepest obscurity--an obscurity -all the more impenetrable from the lack of certain dates. It will -perhaps help to simplify our conceptions if we first sketch what is -known of Assyria from the cuneiform inscriptions, and then fill up the -sketch of those scenes which are more minutely delineated in the Book -of Kings and in the prophecies of Isaiah. - -Sargon--perhaps a successful general of royal blood, though he never -calls himself the son of any one[535]--seems to have usurped the -throne on the death of Shalmaneser IV., during the siege of Samaria in -B.C. 722. He took Samaria, deported its inhabitants, and repeopled it -from the Assyrian dominions. "In their place," he says, in his tablets -in the halls of his palace at Khorsabad, "I settled the men of -countries conquered [by my hand]."[536] In 720 he suppressed a futile -attempt at revolt, headed by a pretender named Yahubid, in Hamath, -which he reduced to "a heap of ruins." For some years after this he -was occupied mainly on his northern frontiers, but he tells us that -until 711 tribute continued to come in from Judah and Philistia. -Meanwhile, these terrified and oppressed feudatories, writhing under -the remorseless dominion of Nineveh, naturally began to listen to the -intrigues of Egypt, whose interest it was to create a bulwark between -herself and the invasion of the armies which were the abhorrence of -the world. Under the influence of Sabaco, which gave new strength and -unity to Egypt, she succeeded in seducing Ashdod from its allegiance -to Sargon. Sargon at once deposed Azuri, King of Ashdod, and put his -brother Ahimit in his place. The Ashdodites soon after deposed Ahimit, -and elected in his place Jaman, who was in alliance with Sabaco.[537] -This revolt was evidently favoured by Judah, Edom, and Moab; for -Sargon says that they, as well as the people of Philistia, "were -speaking treason." The rebellion was crushed by Sargon's -promptitude.[538] He tells his own tale thus:-- - -"In the wrath of my heart I did not divide my army, and I did not -diminish the ranks, but I marched against Ashdod with my warriors, -who did not separate themselves from the traces of my sandals. I -besieged, I took Ashdod and Gunt-Asdodim. I then re-established these -towns. I placed [in them] the people whom my arms had conquered, I put -over them my lieutenant as governor. I regarded them as Assyrians, and -they practised obedience."[539] - -Sargon does not, however, seem to have conducted this campaign in -person; for we read in Isa. xx. 1 that he sent his Turtan--_i.e._, his -commander-in-chief,[540] whose name seems to have been Zir-bni--to -Ashdod, who fought against it and took it. The wretched Philistines -had put their trust in Sabaco. "The people," says Sargon, "and their -evil chiefs sent their presents to Pharaoh, King of Egypt, a prince -who could not save them, and besought his alliance." Isaiah had for -three years been indicating how vain this policy was by one of those -acted parables which so powerfully affect the Eastern mind. He had, by -the word of the Lord, stripped the shoes from on his feet and the -upper robe of sackcloth from his loins, and walked, "naked and -barefoot, for a sign and portent against Egypt and Ethiopia," to -indicate that even thus should the people of Egypt and Ethiopia be -carried away as captives, naked and barefoot, by the kings of Assyria. -Egypt was the boast of one party at Jerusalem, and Ethiopia, which had -now become master of Egypt under Sabaco, was their expectation; but -Isaiah's public self-humiliation showed how utterly their hopes -should come to nought.[541] Before the outbreak at Ashdod, Sargon had -suppressed a revolt of Hanun, or Hanno, King of Gaza, and Egypt and -Assyria first met face to face at Raphia (about B.C. 720), where -Sabaco fought in person with an Egyptian contingent, at a spot -half-way between Gaza and the "river of Egypt."[542] Sabaco, whom -Sargon calls "the Sultan of Egypt" (Siltannu Muzri), had been -defeated, and fled precipitately, but Sargon was not then sufficiently -free from other complications to advance to the Nile. The hoarded -vengeance of Assyria was inflicted upon Egypt nearly a century later -by Esarhaddon and Assurbanipal. - -In the two suppressions of revolt at Ashdod, Sargon or his Turtan must -have come perilously near Jerusalem, and perhaps he may have inflicted -sufficient damage to admit of the boast that he had "conquered" Juda. -If so, his military vanity made him guilty of an exaggeration. - -Far more serious to Sargon was the revolt of Merodach-Baladan, King of -Chalda. Babylon had always been a rival of Nineveh in the competition -for world-wide dominion, and for twelve years, as Sargon says, -Merodach-Baladan had been "sending ambassadors"[543]--to Hezekiah among -others--in the patient effort to consolidate a formidable league. Elam -and Media were with him; and at a solemn banquet, for which they had -"spread the carpets,"[544] and eaten and drank, the cry had risen, -"Arise, ye princes! anoint the shield." Standing in ideal vision on his -watch-tower, Isaiah saw the sweeping rush of the Assyrian troops on -their horses and camels on their way to Babylon. What should come of it? -The answer is in the words, "Fallen, fallen is Babylon, and all the -images of her gods he [Sargon] hath broken to the ground." Alas! there -is no hope from Babylon or its embassy! Would that Isaiah could have -held out a hope! But no, "O my threshed one, son of my threshing-floor, -that which I have heard from the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel, that -have I declared unto you."[545] And so it came to pass. The brave -Babylonian was defeated. In 709 Sargon occupied his palace, took -Dur-yakin, to which he had fled for refuge, and made himself Lord -Paramount as far as the Persian Gulf. It was his last great enterprise. -He built and adorned his palaces, and looked forward to long years of -peace and splendour; but in 705 the dagger-thrust of an assassin--a -malcontent of the town of Kullum--found its way to his heart; and -Sennacherib reigned in his stead. - -Sennacherib--Sin-ahi-irba ("Sin, the moon-god, has multiplied -brothers")[546]--was one of the haughtiest, most splendid, and most -powerful of all the kings of Assyria, though the petty state of Judah, -relying on her God, defied and flouted him. The son of a mighty -conqueror, at the head of a magnificent army, he regarded himself as -the undisputed lord of the world.[547] Born in the purple, and bred up -as crown prince, his primary characteristic was an overweening pride -and arrogance, which shows itself in all his inscriptions. He calls -himself "the Great King, the Powerful King, the King of the Assyrians, -of the nations of the four regions, the diligent ruler, the favourite -of the Great Gods, the observer of sworn faith, the guardian of law, -the establisher of monuments, the noble hero, the strong warrior, the -first of kings, the punisher of unbelievers, the destroyer of wicked -men."[548] He was mighty both in war and peace. His warlike glories -are attested by Herodotus, by Polyhistor, by Abydenus, by Demetrius, -and by his own annals. His peaceful triumphs are attested by the great -palace which he erected at Nineveh, and the magnificent series of -sculptured slabs with which he adorned it; by his canals and -aqueducts, his gateways and embankments, his Bavian sculpture, and his -_stl_ at the Nahr-el-Kelb. He was a worthy successor of his father -Sargon, and of the second Tiglath-Pileser--active in his military -enterprises, indefatigable, persevering, full of resource.[549] - -On one of his bas-reliefs we see this magnificent potentate seated on -his throne, holding two arrows in his right hand, while his left -grasps the bow. A rich bracelet clasps each of his brawny arms. On his -head is the jewelled pyramidal crown of Assyria, with its embroidered -lappets. His dark locks stream down over his shoulders, and the long, -curled beard flows over his breast. His strongly marked, sensual -features wear an aspect of unearthly haughtiness. He is clad in -superbly broidered robes, and his throne is covered with rich -tapestries, and bas-reliefs of Assyrians or captives, who, like the -Greek caryatides, uphold its divisions with their heads and arms. - -Yet all this glory faded into darkness, and all this colossal pride -crumbled into dust. Sennacherib not only died, like his father, by -murder, but by the murderous hands of his own sons, and after the -shattering of all his immense pretensions--a defeated and dishonoured -man. - -One of his invasions of Juda occupies a large part of the Scripture -narrative.[550] It was the fourth time of that terrible contact -between the great world-power which symbolised all that was tyrannic -and idolatrous, and the insignificant tribe which God had chosen for -His own inheritance. - -In the reign of Ahaz, about B.C. 732, Judah had come into collision -with Tiglath-Pileser II. - -Under Shalmaneser IV. and Sargon, the Northern Kingdom had ceased to -exist in 722. - -Under Sargon, Judah had been harassed and humbled, and had witnessed -the suppression of the Philistian revolt, and of the defeat of the -powerful Sabaco at Raphia about 720. - -Now came the fourth and most overwhelming calamity. If the patriots of -Jerusalem had placed any hopes in the disappearance of the ferocious -Sargon, they must speedily have recognised that he had left behind him -a no less terrible successor. - -Sennacherib reigned apparently twenty-four years (B.C. 705-681). On -his accession he placed a brother, whose name is unknown, on the -vice-regal throne of Babylon, and contented himself with the title of -King of the Assyrians. This brother was speedily dethroned by a -usurper named Hagisa, who only reigned thirty days, and was then slain -by the indefatigable Merodach-Baladan, who held the throne for six -months. He was driven out by Belibus, who had been trained "like a -little dog" in the palace of Nineveh,[551] but was now made King of -Sumr and Accad--_i.e._, of Babylonia. Sennacherib entered the palace -of Babylon and carried off the wife of Merodach and endless spoil in -triumph, while Merodach fled into the land of Guzumman, and (like the -Duke of Monmouth) hid himself "among the marshes and reeds," where the -Assyrians searched for him for five days, but found no trace of him. -After three years (702-699) Belibus proved faithless, and Sennacherib -made his son Assur-nadin-sum viceroy of Babylon. - -His second campaign was against the Medes in Northern Elam. - -His third (701) was against the Khatti (the Hittites)--_i.e._, against -Phoenicia and Palestine.[552] He drove King Luli from Sidon "by the mere -terror of the splendour of my sovereignty," and placed Tubalu (_i.e._, -Ithbaal) in his place, and subdued into tributary districts Arpad, -Byblos, Ashdod, Ammon, Moab, and Edom, suppressing at the same time a -very abortive rising in Samaria. "All these brought rich presents and -kissed my feet." He also subdued Zidka, King of Askelon, from whom he -took Beth-Dagon, Joppa, and other towns. Pad, the King of Ekron, was a -faithful vassal of Assyria; he was therefore deposed by the revolting -Ekronites, and sent in chains into the safe custody of Hezekiah, who -"imprisoned him in darkness." The rebel states all relied on the -Egyptians and Ethiopians. Sennacherib fought against Egyptians and -Ethiopians, "in reliance upon Assur my God," at Altaqu (B.C. 701), and -claims to have defeated them, and carried off the sons and charioteers -of the King of Egypt, and the charioteers of the kings of Ethiopia.[553] -He then tells us that he punished Altaqu and Timnath.[554] He impaled -the rebels of Ekron on stakes all round the city. He restored Pad, and -made him a vassal. "Hezekiah [Chazaqiahu] of Judah, who had not -submitted to my yoke, the terror of the splendour of my sovereignty -overwhelmed. Himself as a bird in a cage, in the midst of Jerusalem, his -royal city, I shut up. The Arabians and his dependants, whom he had -introduced for the defence of Jerusalem, his royal city, together with -thirty talents of gold, eight hundred of silver, bullion, precious -stones, ivory couches and thrones, an abundant treasure, with his -daughters, his harem, and his attendants, I caused to be brought after -me to Nineveh. He sent his envoy to pay tribute and render homage." At -the same time, he overran Juda, took forty-six fenced cities and many -smaller towns, "with laying down of walls, hewing about, and trampling -down," and carried off more than two hundred thousand captives with -their spoil. Part of Hezekiah's domains was divided among three -Philistine vassals who had remained faithful to Assyria. - -It was in the midst of this terrible crisis that Hezekiah had sent to -Sennacherib at Lachish his offer of submission, saying, "I have -offended; return from me; that which thou puttest upon me I will -bear."[555] The spoiling of the palace and Temple was rendered necessary -to raise the vast mulct which the Assyrian King required.[556] - -It is at Lachish--now Um-Lakis, a fortified hill in the Shephelah, -south of Jerusalem, between Gaza and Eleutheropolis--that we catch -another personal glimpse of the mighty oppressor. We see him depicted, -on his triumphal tablets, in the palace-chambers of Kouyunjik, -engaged in the siege; for the town offered a determined -resistance,[557] and required all the energies and all the trained -heroism of his forces. We see him next, carefully painted, seated on -his royal throne in magnificent apparel, with his tiara and bracelets, -receiving the spoils and captives of the city. The inscription says: -"Sennacherib, the mighty king, the king of the country of Assyria, -sitting on the throne of judgment at the entrance of the city of -Lakisha. I give permission for its slaughter." He certainly implied -that he took the city, but a doubt is thrown on this by 2 Chron. -xxxii. 1, which only says that "he _thought_ to win these cities"; and -the historian says (2 Kings xix. 8) that he "departed from Lachish." -Lachish was evidently a very strong city, and it is so depicted in the -palace-tablets at Kouyunjik. It had been fortified by Rehoboam, and -had furnished a refuge to the wretched Amaziah.[558] - -If Judah and Jerusalem had listened to the messages of Isaiah,[559] -they might have been saved the humiliating affliction which seemed to -have plunged the brief sun of their prosperity into seas of blood. He -had warned them incessantly and in vain. He had foretold their -present desolation, in which Zion should be like a woman seated on the -ground, wailing in her despair. He had taught them that formalism was -no religion, and that external rites did not win Jehovah's approval. -He had told them how foolish it was to put trust in the shadow of -Egypt, and had not shrunk from revealing the fearful consequences -which should follow the setting up of their own false wisdom against -the wisdom of Jehovah. Yet, intermingled with pictures of suffering, -and threats of a harvestless year, designed to punish the vanity and -display of their women, and the intimation--never actually -fulfilled--that even the palace and Temple should become "the joy of -wild asses, a pasture of flocks," he constantly implies that the -disaster would be followed by a mysterious, divine, complete -deliverance, and ultimately by a Messianic reign of joy and peace. -Night is at hand, he said, and darkness; but after the darkness will -come a brighter dawn. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[535] One legend of his birth resembles the finding of Moses in the -bulrushes. - -[536] Schrader, _K. A. T._, pp. 272-274; _Records of the Past_, vii. 28. - -[537] Smith, _Eponym Canon_, p. 130. - -[538] See Prof. Smith, _Isaiah_, p. 198. - -[539] _Records of the Past_, vii. 40. Sargon's words are, "The people -of Philistia, Judah, Edom, and Moab were speaking treason. The people -and their evil chiefs, to fight against me, unto _Pharaoh, the King of -Egypt, a monarch who could not save them_, their presents carried, and -besought his alliance" (G. Smith, _Assyrian Discoveries_, 290). - -[540] On the monuments called _Turtanu_, "Holder of power." See -Schrader in Riehm, _s.v._ - -[541] Raphia, or Ropeh, is on the borders of the desert. Asia beat -Africa in every encounter--at Raphia, at Altaqu, at Carchemish. The -impression of the seal of Shabak, attached to his capitulations with -Sargon, was found at Nineveh by Sir A. H. Layard, and is now in the -British Museum. Shabak died in 712. His son Shabatoh succeeded him in -Egypt, and his nephew(?) Tirhakah in Ethiopia. Sabaco's name assumes -many forms (LXX., [Greek: Sgr]; Herod., ii. 137; [Greek: Sabaks]; -Vulg., _Sua_). The Egyptians called him Shaba(ka). - -[542] Isa. xx. 1-6. - -[543] Lenormant, _Les Premires Civilisations_, ii. 203; _Records of -the Past_, vii. 41-46. - -[544] Isa. xxi. 6, A.V., "Watch in the watch-tower." Hitzig, Cheyne, -"They spread the carpets." Much in this short oracle (xxi. 1-10) is -obscure. Isaiah seems, in denouncing the fate of Babylon, to mourn for -the ruin of the smaller states of which it was the prelude (G. Smith, -_Soc. of Bibl. Arch._, ii. 320 Kleinert, _Stud. u. Krit._, 1877 W. R. -Smith in _Enc. Brit._, _s.v._ "Isaiah"). - -[545] Isa. xxi. 10--_i.e._, "My people threshed and trodden"; LXX., -[Greek: ho kataleleimmenos kai hoi odynmenoi] _Records of the Past_, -vii. 47. - -[546] Herod., [Greek: Sanacharibos]; Jos., [Greek: Senachribos]. See -Appendix I. Sin was the moon-god; Merodach, the planet Jupiter; Adar, -Saturn; Ishtai, Venus; Nebo, Mercury; Nergal, Mars (Schrader, ii. 117). - -[547] Sargon seems to have been murdered in the palace of unparalleled -splendour which he built at Dur-Sharrukin ("The City of Sargon"). It -took him five years to build it with armies of workmen. Its halls, -opened by Botta, were the first Assyrian halls ever entered by a -modern's foot. It is strange that this greatest of Assyrian kings is -only mentioned once in the Bible (Isa. xx. 1). We owe to Assyriology -his restoration to his proper place in the annals of mankind. See -Ragozin, _Assyria_, 247-254. - -[548] Rawlinson, _Ancient Monarchies_, ii. 178. - -[549] Canon Rawlinson, _Kings of Israel and Judah_, 187. - -[550] On his own monuments this campaign, except its final catastrophe, -is narrated in four sections: (1) The subjugation of Phoenicia, and of -Philistine towns; (2) the conquest of King Zidka of Askelon; (3) the -defeat of Ekron, the restoration of their vassal king Pad to his -throne, and the defeat of Egypt at Altaqu; (4) the expedition against -Jerusalem (Schrader, E. Tr., i. 298). See Appendix I. - -[551] This allusion is said to be the only instance of humour--"_grim_ -humour, or it would not be Assyrian"--which occurs in the Assyrian -annals. - -[552] Schrader, pp. 234-279. The account of the memorable campaign is -narrated in duplicate on the Taylor Cylinder in the British Museum, -and on the Bull Inscription at Kouyunjik. - -[553] Sennacherib calls Tirhakah's army "a host that no man could -number"; but it was defeated by the better discipline, the heavier -armour, and the superior physical strength of the Assyrians. - -[554] See Josh. xix. 43. - -[555] This very phrase "I imposed on them" is found on Sennacherib's -monument (Schrader, ii. 1). The references, when not otherwise -specified, are to Whitehouse's English translation. - -[556] In 2 Kings xviii. 16 the word "pillars" or "doorposts" is -uncertain. LXX., [Greek: estrigmena]; Vulg., _laminas auri_. - -[557] 2 Chron. xxxii. 9. He had to besiege it "with all his power." He -seems to have thought it even more important than Jerusalem, for he -superintended the siege in person (Layard, _Nineveh and Babylon_, 150; -_Monuments of Nineveh_, 2nd series, pl. 21). The ruined Tel of -Umm-el-Laks lies between the Wady Simsim and the Wady-el-Ahsy (Riehm). - -[558] See 2 Chron. xi. 9, xxv. 27; Jer. xxxiv. 7. The allusion to this -city in Micah (i. 13) is obscure: "O thou inhabitant of Lachish [swift -steed], bind the chariot to the swift steed: she is the beginning of -sin to the daughter of Zion: for the transgressions of Israel were -found in thee." This seems to imply that some form of idolatry had -come from Israel to Lachish, and from Lachish to Jerusalem. In -Sennacherib's picture of the city, foreign worship is represented as -going on in it (Layard, _Monuments of Nineveh_, Pls. 21 and 24; -Rawlinson, _Herodotus_, i. 477). - -[559] Isa. xxix., xxx., xxxi. - - - - - CHAPTER XXVIII - - _THE GREAT DELIVERANCE_ - - B.C. 701 - - 2 _Kings_ xix. 1-37 - - "There brake He the lightnings of the bow, the shield, the sword, - and the battle."--PSALM lxxvi. 3. - - "[Greek: d pros ton Assurion.]"--LXX. - - "And the might of the Gentile, unsmote by the sword, - Hath melted like snow at the glance of the Lord." - BYRON. - - "Vuolsi cosi col dove si puote - Cio che si vuole: e pi non dimandare." - DANTE. - - "Through love, through hope, through faith's transcendent dower, - We feel that we are greater than we know." - WORDSWORTH. - - "God shall help her, and that when the morning dawns."--PSALM - xlvi. 5. - - -In spite of the humble submission of Hezekiah, it is a surprise to learn -from Isaiah that Sennacherib--after he had accepted the huge fine and -fixed the tribute, and departed to subdue Lachish--broke his -covenant.[560] He sent his three chief officers--the Turtan, or -commander-in-chief, whose name seems to have been Belemurani;[561] the -Rabsaris, or chief eunuch;[562] and the Rabshakeh, or chief -captain[563]--from Lachish to Hezekiah, with a command of absolute, -unconditional surrender, to be followed by deportation. By this conduct -Sennacherib violated his own boast that he was "a keeper of treaties." -Yet it is not difficult to conjecture the reason for his change of plan. -He had found it no easy matter to subdue even the very minor fortress of -Lachish; how unwise, then, would it be for him to leave in his rear an -uncaptured city so well fortified as Jerusalem! He was advancing towards -Egypt. It was obviously a strategic error to spare on his route a -hostile and almost impregnable stronghold as a nucleus for the plans of -his enemies. Moreover, he had heard rumours that Tirhakah, the third and -last Ethiopian king of Egypt, was advancing against him, and it was most -important to prevent any junction between his forces and those of -Hezekiah.[564] He could not come in person to Jerusalem, for the siege -of Lachish was on his hands; but he detached from his army a large -contingent under his Turtan, to win the Jews by seductive promises, or -to subdue Jerusalem by force. Once more, therefore, the Holy City saw -beneath her often-captured walls the vast beleaguering host, and -"governors and rulers clothed most gorgeously, horsemen riding upon -horses, all of them desirable young men." Isaiah describes to us how the -people crowded to the house-tops, half dead with fear, weeping and -despairing, and crying to the hills to cover them, and bereft of their -rulers, who had been bound by the archers of the enemy in their attempt -to escape. They gazed on the quiver-bearing warriors of Elam in their -chariots, and the serried ranks of the shields of Kir, and the cavalry -round the gates. And he tells us how, as so often occurs at moments of -mad hopelessness, many who ought to have been crying to God in sackcloth -and ashes, gave themselves up, on the contrary, to riot and revelry, -eating flesh, and drinking wine, and saying: "Let us eat and drink; for -to-morrow we die."[565] The king alone had shown patience, calmness, and -active foresight; and he alone, by his energy and faith, had restored -some confidence to the spirits of his fainting people. - -Although the city had been refortified by the king, and supplied with -water, the hearts of the inhabitants must have sunk within them when -they saw the Assyrian army investing the walls, and when the three -commissioners--taking their station "by the conduit of the upper pool -which is in the highway of the fuller's field"--summoned the king to -hear the ultimatum of Sennacherib. - -The king did not in person obey the summons; but he, too, sent out his -three chief officers. They were Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah, who, as -the chamberlain (_al-hab-bath_), was a great prince (_nagd_); -Shebna, who had been degraded, perhaps at the instance of Isaiah, from -the higher post, and was now secretary (_sopher_); and Joah, son of -Asaph, the chronicler (_mazkr_), to whom we probably owe the minute -report of the memorable scene. No doubt they went forth in the pomp of -office--Eliakim with his robe, and girdle, and key.[566] The -Rabshakeh proved himself, indeed, "an affluent orator," and evinced -such familiarity with the religious politics of Judah and Jerusalem, -that this, in conjunction with his perfect mastery of Hebrew, gives -colour to the belief that he was an apostate Jew. He began by -challenging the idle confidence of Hezekiah, and his vain words[567] -that he had counsel and strength for the war. Upon what did he rely? -On the broken and dangerous bulrush of Egypt?[568] It would but pierce -his hand! On Jehovah? But Hezekiah had forfeited his protection by -sweeping away His _bamoth_ and His altars! Why, let Hezekiah make a -wager;[569] and if Sennacherib furnished him with two thousand horses, -he would be unable to find riders for them! How, then, could he drive -back even the lowest of the Assyrian captains? And was not Jehovah on -their side? It was He who had bidden them destroy Jerusalem! - -That last bold assertion, appealing as it did to all that was -erroneous and abject in the minds of the superstitious, and backed, as -it was, by the undeniable force of the envoy's argument, smote so -bitterly on the ear of Hezekiah's courtiers, that they feared it would -render negotiation impossible. They humbly entreated the orator to -speak to "his servants" in the Aramaic language of Assyria, which they -understood,[570] and not in Hebrew, which was the language of all the -Jews who stood in crowds on the walls. Surely this was a diplomatic -embassy to their king, not an incitement to popular sedition? - -The answer of the Rabshakeh was truly Assyrian in its utterly brutal -and ruthless coarseness. Taking up his position directly in front of -the wall,[571] and ostentatiously addressing the multitude, he ignored -the representatives of Hezekiah. Who were they? asked he. His master -had not sent him to speak to them, or to their poor little puppet of a -king, but to the people on the wall, the foul garbage of whose -sufferings of thirst and famine they should share.[572] And to all the -multitude the great king's[573] message was:--Do not be deceived. -Hezekiah cannot save you. Jehovah will not save you. Come to terms -with me, and give me hostages and pledges and a present, and then live -in happy peace and plenty until I come and deport you to a land as -fair and fruitful as this. How should Jehovah deliver them? Had any of -the gods of the nations delivered them out of the hands of the King of -Assyria? "Where are the gods of Hamath, and of Arpad? Where are the -gods of Sepharvaim, Hena, and Ivvah? Have the gods of Samaria -delivered Samaria out of my hand, that Jehovah should deliver -Jerusalem out of my hand?"[574] - -It was a very powerful oration, but the orator must have been a little -disconcerted to find that it was listened to in absolute silence. He -had disgracefully violated the comity of international intercourse by -appealing to subjects against their lawful king; yet from the starving -people there came not a murmur of reply. Faithful to the behest of -their king in the midst of their misery and terror, they answered not -a word. Agamemnon is silent before the coarse jeers of Thersites. "The -sulphurous flash dies in its own smoke, only leaving a hateful stench -behind it!" And in this attitude of the people there was something -very sublime and very instructive. Dumb, stricken, starving, the -wretched Jews did not answer the envoy's taunts or menaces, because -they would not. They were not even in those extremities to be seduced -from their allegiance to the king whom they honoured, though the -speaker had contemptuously ignored his existence. And though the -Rabshakeh had cut them to the heart with his specious appeals and -braggart vaunts, yet "this clever, self-confident, persuasive -personage, with two languages on his tongue, and an army at his back," -could not shake the confidence in God, which, however unreasonable it -might seem, had been elevated into a conviction by their king and -their prophet. The Rabsak had tried to seduce the people into -rebellion, but he had failed.[575] They were ready to die for Hezekiah -with the fidelity of despair. The mirage of sensual comfort in exiled -servitude should not tempt them from the scorched wilderness from -which they could still cry out for the living God. - -Yet the Assyrian's words had struck home into the hearts of his -greatest hearers, and therefore how much more into those of the -ignorant multitudes! Eliakim and Shebna and Joah came to Hezekiah -with their clothes rent, and told him the words of the Rabshakeh. And -when the king heard it, when he found that even his submission had -been utterly in vain, he too rent his clothes, and put on -sackcloth,[576] and went into the only place where he could hope to -find comfort, even into the house of the Lord, which he had cleansed -and restored to beauty, although afterwards he had been driven to -despoil it. Needing an earthly counsellor, he sent Eliakim and Shebna -and the elders of the priests to Isaiah. They were to tell him the -outcome of this day of trouble, rebuke, and contumely; and since the -Rabshakeh had insulted and despised Jehovah, they were to urge the -prophet to make his appeal to Him, and to pray for the remnant which -the Assyrians had left.[577] - -The answer of Isaiah was a dauntless defiance. If others were in -despair, he was not in the least dismayed. "Be not afraid"--such was -his message--"of the mere words with which the boastful boys of the -King of Assyria have blasphemed Me.[578] Behold, I will put a spirit -in him, and he shall hear a rumour,[579] and shall return to his own -land; and I will cause him to fall by the sword in his own land." - -Much crestfallen at the total and unexpected failure of the embassy, and -of his own heart-shaking appeals, the Rabshakeh returned. But meanwhile -Sennacherib had taken Lachish, and marched to Libnah (Tel-es-Safa), -which he was now besieging.[580] There it was that he heard the "rumour" -of which Isaiah had spoken--the report, namely, that Tirhakah, the third -king of the Ethiopian dynasty of Pharaohs,[581] was advancing in person -to meet him. This was B.C. 701, and it is perhaps only by anticipation -that Tirhakah is called "King" of Ethiopia. He was only the general and -representative of his father Shabatok, if (as some think) he did not -succeed to the throne till 698. - -It was impossible for Sennacherib under these circumstances to return -northwards to Jerusalem, of which the siege would inevitably occupy -some time. But he sent a menacing letter,[582] reminding Hezekiah that -neither king nor god had ever yet saved any city from the hands of the -Assyrian destroyers. Where were the kings, he asked again, of Hamath, -Arpad, Sepharvaim, Hena, Ivvah? What had the gods of Gozan, Haran, -Rezeph, and the children of Eden in Telassar done to save their -countries from Sennacherib's ancestors, when they had laid them under -the ban?[583] - -Again the pious king found comfort in God's Temple. Taking with him the -scornful and blasphemous letter, he spread it out before Jehovah in the -Temple with childlike simplicity, that Jehovah might read its insults -and be moved by this dumb appeal.[584] Then both he and Isaiah cried -mightily to God, "who sitteth above the cherubim," admitting the truth -of what Sennacherib had said, and that the kings of Assyria had -destroyed the nations, and burnt their vain gods in the fire. But of -what significance was that? Those were but gods of wood and stone, the -works of men's hands.[585] But Jehovah was the One, the True, the Living -God. Would He not manifest among the nations His eternal supremacy? - -And as the king prayed the word of Jehovah came to Isaiah, and he sent -to Hezekiah this glorious message about Sennacherib:-- - -"The virgin, the daughter of Zion, hath despised thee, and laughed thee -to scorn. The daughter of Jerusalem hath shaken her head at thee."[586] - -The blasphemies, the vaunts, the menacing self-confidence of -Sennacherib, were his surest condemnation. Did he count God a cypher? -It was to God alone that he owed the fearful power which had made the -nations like grass upon the housetops, like blasted corn, before him. -And because God knew his rage and tumult, God would treat him as -Sargon his father had treated conquered kings:-- - -"I will put My hook in thy nose, and My bridle in thy lips.[587] And I -will turn thee back by the way by which thou camest." He had thought -to conquer Egypt:[588] instead of that he should be driven back in -confusion to Assyria. - -It was but a plainer enunciation of the truths which Isaiah had again -and again intimated in enigma and parable. It was the fearless -security of Judah's lion; the safety of the rock amid the deluge; the -safety of the poor brood under the wings of the Divine protection from -"the great Birds'-nester of the world"; the crashing downfall of the -lopped Lebanonian cedar, while the green shoot and tender branch out -of the withered stump of Jesse should take root downward and bear -fruit upward.[589] - -And the sign was given to Hezekiah that this should be so.[590] This -year there should be no harvest, except such as was spontaneous; for -in the stress of Assyrian invasion sowing and reaping had been -impossible. The next year the harvest should only be from this -accidental produce. But in the third year, secure at last, they should -sow and reap, and plant vineyards and eat the fruit thereof.[591] And -though but a remnant of the people was left out of the recent -captivity, they should grow and flourish, and Jerusalem should see the -besieging host of Assyria no more for ever; for Jehovah would defend -the city for His own sake, and for His servant David's sake. - -Thereafter occurred the great deliverance.[592] In some way--we know -not and never shall know how--by a blast of the simoom, or sudden -outburst of plague, or furious panic, or sudden assault, or by some -other calamity,[593] the host of Assyria was smitten in the camp, and -one hundred and eighty-five thousand, including their chief leaders, -perished. The historian, in a manner habitual to pious Semitic -writers, attributes the devastation to the direct action of the "angel -of the Lord";[594] but as Dr. Johnson said long ago, "We are certainly -not to suppose that the angel went about with a sword in his hand, -striking them one by one, but that some powerful natural agent was -employed."[595] - -The Forty-Sixth Psalm is generally regarded as the _Te Deum_ sung in -the Temple over this deliverance, and its opening words, "God is our -refuge and strength," are inscribed over the cathedral of St. Sophia -at Constantinople. - -It is usually supposed that this overwhelming disaster happened to the -host of Assyria _before Jerusalem_. This, however, is not stated; and -as the capture of Lachish was an urgent necessity, it is probable that -the Turtan led back the forces which had accompanied him, and took -them afterwards to Libnah.[596] Yet, since Libnah was but ten miles -from Jerusalem, the Jews could not feel safe for a day until the -mighty news came that the - - "Angel of God spread his wings on the blast, - And breathed in the face of the foe as he passed, - And the eyes of the sleepers waxed heavy and chill, - And their breasts but once heaved, and for ever grew still." - -When the catastrophe which had happened to the main army and the flight -of Sennacherib became known, the scattered forces would melt away. - -All the Assyrians who escaped were now hurrying back[597] to Nineveh -with their foiled king. Sennacherib seems to have occupied himself in -the north, except so far as he was forced to fight fiercely against -his own rebel subjects. He never recovered this complete humiliation. -He never again came southwards. He survived the catastrophe for -seventeen or twenty years,[598] and fought five or six campaigns; but -at the end of that period, while he was worshipping in the house of -Nisroch or Assarac (Assur), his god,[599] he was murdered by his two -sons Adrammelech (Adar-malik--"Adar is king") and Sharezer -(Nergal-sarussar--"Nergal protect the king"),[600] who envied him his -throne. They escaped into the land of Ararat, but were defeated and -killed by their younger brother Esarhaddon (Assur-kh-iddin--"Assur -bestowed a 'brother'") at the battle of Hani-Rabbat, on the Upper -Euphrates. He succeeded Sennacherib, and ultimately avenged on Egypt -his father's overwhelming disaster. He is perhaps the "cruel lord" of -Isa. xix. 4, and it is not unnatural that he should have prevailed -against his parricidal brothers, for we are told that in a previous -battle at Melitene he had shown such prowess that the troops then and -there proclaimed him King of Assyria with shouts of "This is our -king."[601] He reigned from B.C. 681-668, and in his reign Assyria -culminated before her last decline.[602] He was the builder of the -temple at Nimrd, and erected thirty other temples. Babylon and -Nineveh were both his capitals,[603] and he had previously been -viceroy of the former. - -The glorious deliverance in which the faith and courage of the King of -Judah had had their share naturally increased the prosperity and -prestige of Hezekiah, and lifted the authority of Isaiah to an -unprecedented height. Hezekiah probably did not long survive the -uplifting of this dark cloud, but during the remainder of his life "he -was magnified in the sight of all nations."[604] When he died, all -Judah and Jerusalem did him honour, and gave him a splendid burial. -Apparently the old tombs of the kings--the catacomb constructed by -David and Solomon--had in the course of two and a half centuries -become full, so that he had to be buried "in the ascent of the -sepulchres," perhaps some niche higher than the other graves of the -catacomb, which was henceforth disused for the burial of the kings of -Judah. We have had occasion to observe the many particulars in which -his reign was memorable, and to his other services must be added the -literary activity to which we owe the collection and editing, by his -scribes, of the Proverbs of Solomon. His reign had practically -witnessed the institution of the faithful Jewish Church under the -influence of his great prophetic guide.[605] - -The question whether the portent of the destruction of the Assyrian -was identical with that related by Herodotus has never been finally -answered. Herodotus places the scene of the disaster at Pelusium,[606] -and tells this story:--Sennacherib, King of the Arabs and Assyrians, -invaded Egypt. Its king, Sethos, of the Tanite dynasty, in despair -entered the temple of his god Pthah (or Vulcan), and wept.[607] The -god appeared to him with promises of deliverance, and Sethos marched -to meet Sennacherib with an army of poor artisans, since he was a -priest, and the caste of warriors was ill-affected to him. In the -night the god Pthah sent hosts of field-mice, which gnawed the -quivers, bow-strings, and shield-straps of the Assyrians, who -consequently fled, and were massacred. An image of the priest-king -with a mouse in his hand stood in the temple of Pthah, and on its -pedestal the inscription, which might also point the moral of the -Biblical narrative, [Greek: Es eme tis horen eusebs est] ("Let him -who looks on me be pious"). Josephus seems so far to accept this -version that he refers to Herodotus, and says that Sennacherib's -failure was the result of a frustration in Egypt.[608] The _mouse_ in -the hand of the statue probably originated the details of the legend; -but according to Horapollion it was the hieroglyphic sign of -destruction by plague.[609] Bhr says that it was also the symbol of -Mars. Readers of Homer will remember the title Apollo _Smintheus_ -("the destroyer of mice"), and the story that mice were worshipped in -the Troas because they gnawed the bow-strings of the enemy. - -But whatever may have been the mode of the retribution, or the scene in -which it took place, it is certainly historical. The outlines of the -narrative in the sacred historian are identical with those in the -Assyrian records. The annals of Sennacherib tell us the four initial -stages of the great campaign in the conquest of Phoenicia, of Askelon, -and of Ekron, the defeat of the Egyptians at Altaqu, and the earlier -hostilities against Hezekiah. The Book of Kings concentrates our -attention on the details of the close of the invasion. On this point, -whether from accident, or because Sennacherib did not choose to register -his own calamity, and the frustration of the gods of whose protection he -boasted, the Assyrian records are silent. Baffled conquerors rarely -dwell on their own disasters. It is not in the despatches of Napoleon -that we shall find the true story of his abandonment of Syria, of the -defeats of his forces in Spain, or of his retreat from Moscow.[610] - -The great lesson of the whole story is the reward and the triumph of -indomitable faith. Faith may still burn with a steady flame when the -difficulties around it seem insuperable, when all refutation of the -attacks of its enemies seems to be impossible, when Hope itself has -sunk into white ashes in which scarcely a gleam of heat remains. -Isaiah had nothing to rely upon; he had no argument wherewith to -furnish Hezekiah beyond the bare and apparently unmeaning promise, -"Jehovah is our Judge; Jehovah is our Lawgiver; Jehovah is our King. -He will save us." It was a magnificent vindication of his inspired -conviction, when all turned out--not indeed in minute details, but in -every essential fact--exactly as he had prophesied from the first. -Even in B.C. 740 he had declared that the sins of Judah deserved and -would receive condign punishment, though a remnant should be -saved.[611] That the retribution would come from some foreign -enemy--Assyria or Egypt, or both--he felt sure. Jehovah would hiss for -the fly in the uttermost canals of Egypt, and for the bee that is in -the land of Assyria, and both should swarm in the crevices of the -rocks, and over the pastures.[612] Later on in 732, in the reign of -Ahaz, he pointed to Assyria,[613] as the destined scourge, and he -realised this still more clearly in 725 and 721, when Shalmaneser and -Sargon were tearing Samaria to pieces.[614] Contrary, indeed, to his -expectation, the Assyrians did not then destroy Jerusalem, or even -formally besiege it. The revolt from Assyria, the reliance on Egypt, -did not for a moment blind his judgment or alter his conviction; and -in 701 it came true when Sennacherib was on the march for -Palestine.[615] Yet he never wavered in the apparently impossible -conclusion, that, in spite of all, in spite even of his own darker -prophecies (xxxii. 14), Jerusalem shall in some Divine manner be -saved.[616] The deliverance would be, as he declared from first to -last, the work of Jehovah, not the work of man,[617] and because of it -Sennacherib would return to his own land and perish there.[618] The -details might be dim and wavering; the result was certain. Isaiah was -no thaumaturge, no peeping wizard, no muttering necromancer, no -monthly prognosticator.[619] He was a prophet--that is, an inspired -moral and spiritual teacher who was able to foresee and to foretell, -not in their details, but in their broad outlines, the events yet -future, because he was enabled to read them by the eye of faith ere -they had yet occurred. His faith convinced him that predictions -founded on eternal principles have all the certainty of a law, and -that God's dealings with men and nations in the future can be seen in -the light of experience derived from the history of the past. Courage, -zeal, unquenchable hope, indomitable resolution, spring from that -perfect confidence in God which is the natural reward of innocence and -faithfulness. Isaiah trusted in God, and he knew that they who put -their trust in Him can never be confounded. - -No event produced a deeper impression on the minds of the Jews, though -that impression was soon afterwards, for a time, obliterated. -Naturally, it elevated the authority of Isaiah into unquestioned -pre-eminence during the reign of Hezekiah. It has left its echo, not -only in his own triumphant pans, but also in the Forty-Sixth Psalm, -which the Septuagint calls "An ode to the Assyrian," and perhaps also -in the Seventy-Fifth and Seventy-Sixth Psalms. In the minds of all -faithful Israelites it established for ever the conviction that God -had chosen Judah for Himself, and Israel for His own possession; that -God was in the midst of Zion, and she should not be confounded: "God -shall help her, and that right early." And it contains a noble and -inspiring lesson for all time. "It is not without reason," says Dean -Stanley, "that in the Churches of Moscow the exultation over the fall -of Sennacherib is still read on the anniversary of the retreat of the -French from Russia, or that Arnold, in his lectures on Modern History, -in the impressive passage in which he dwells on that great -catastrophe, declared that for the memorable night of the frost in -which twenty thousand horses perished, and the strength of the French -army was utterly broken, he knew of no language so well fitted to -describe it as the words in which Isaiah described the advance and -destruction of the hosts of Sennacherib."[620] - -They had been brought face to face, the two kings--Sennacherib and -Hezekiah. One was the impious boaster who relied on his own strength, -and on the mighty host which dried up rivers with their trampling -march--the worldling who thought to lord it over the affrighted globe; -the other was the poor kinglet of the Chosen People, with his one city -and his enfeebled people, and his dominion not so large as one of the -smallest English counties. But "one with God is irresistible," "one -with God is always in a majority." The poor, weak prince triumphs over -the terrific conqueror, because he trusts in Him to whom -world-desolating tyrants are but as the small dust of the balance, -and who "taketh up the isles as a very little thing."[621] - -As Assyria now vanishes almost entirely from the history of the Chosen -People, we may here recall with delight one large and loving prophecy, -to show that the Hebrews were sometimes uplifted by the power of -inspiration above the narrowness of a bigoted and exclusive spirit. -Desperately as Israel had suffered, both from Egypt and Assyria, Isaiah -could still utter the glowing Messianic Prophecy which included the -Gentiles in the privileges of the Golden Age to come. He foretold that-- - -"In that day shall Israel be the third with Egypt and Assyria, as a -blessing in the midst of the land: whom the Lord of hosts shall bless, -saying, Blessed be Egypt My people, and Assyria the work of My hands, -and Israel Mine inheritance."[622] - - "That strain I heard was of a higher mood!" - - * * * * * - -King Hezekiah can have no finer panegyric than that of the son of -Sirach: "Even the kings of Judah failed, for they forsook the law of -the Most High: all except David, and Ezekias, and Josias failed."[623] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[560] Isa. xxxiii. 8. - -[561] Isa. xx. 1. - -[562] Jer. xxxix. 3. The meaning of the name is not certain. _Sars_, -in Hebrew, is "eunuch"; but the word is not known in Assyrian records, -and we should expect _Rabsarsm_, as in Dan. i. 3. - -[563] Rabsak perhaps means _chief officer_ or vizier, and is Hebraised -into Rabshakeh. Prof. G. A. Smith (_Isaiah_, p. 345) calls him -"Sennacherib's Bismarck." Rabshakeh, usually rendered "chief cupbearer," -is an Aramaised form of Rabsak (great chief); but we know of no chief -cupbearer at the Assyrian court (Schrader, _K. A. T._, 199 f.). - -[564] From an Apis-stl he seems to have reigned twenty-six years -(B.C. 694-668?). - -[565] Isa. xxii. 1-13. - -[566] Eliakim. See Isa. xxii. 21, 22. - -[567] "Vain words"; lit., "a word of the lips." LXX., [Greek: logoi -cheilen]. - -[568] Comp. Isa. xxx. 1-7; Ezek. xxix. 6. It seems to be an -over-refinement to suppose that Sennacherib refers to the divisions -between Egypt and Ethiopia. - -[569] 2 Kings xviii. 23, A.V.: "Let Hezekiah give pledges." - -[570] Heb., _Armth_. - -[571] 2 Kings xviii. 28, where _stood_ should be rendered _came -forward_. - -[572] The coarse expression is softened down by the Chronicler (2 -Chron. xxxii. 18). - -[573] The kings of Assyria usually called themselves "great king, -mighty king, king of the multitude, king of the land Assur." - -[574] Every one must notice the glaring inconsistency between this -_defiance_ of Jehovah and the previous claim to the possession of His -sanction. On Hamath, Arpad, etc., see Schrader, ii. 7-10. - -[575] Isa. xxxiii. 8: "He hath broken the covenant, he hath despised -the cities, he regardeth no man." - -[576] 1 Kings xx. 32; 2 Kings vi. 30. - -[577] Sennacherib had already carried off vast numbers. See Isa. xxiv. -1-12; Demetrius _ap._ Clem. Alex., _Strom._, i. 403. - -[578] Isaiah's phrase, _na'ar melek_, "lads of the king," is -contemptuous. LXX., [Greek: paidaria]. - -[579] Heb., _ruach_; LXX., [Greek: didmi en aut pneuma]. Theodoret -calls this "spirit" _cowardice_ ([Greek: tn deilian oimai dloun]). - -[580] Libnah means "whiteness." Dean Stanley (_S. and P._, 207, 258) -identifies it with a white-faced hill, the Blanchegarde of the -Crusaders. - -[581] The dates usually given are Sabaco, B.C. 725-712; Shabatok, -712-698; Tirhakah, 698-672. Manetho, [Greek: Tarachos]; Strabo, -[Greek: Terakn, ho Aithips]. He was third king of the twenty-fifth -dynasty, and the greatest of the Egyptian sovereigns who came from -Ethiopia. He reigned gloriously for many years. We see his figure at -Medinet Abou, smiting ten captive princes with an iron mace; but he -was finally defeated by Esarhaddon, and in 668 by Assurbanipal at -Karbanit (Canopus). He is called by his conqueror "Tar-ku-u, King of -Egypt and Cush" (Schrader, _K. A. T._, 336 ff.). - -[582] Heb., _Sepharm_; Vulg., _litter_; 2 Chron. xxxii. 17. The more -ordinary term for a letter is _iggereth_. - -[583] 2 Kings xix. 12 (Heb.); Ezek. xxvii. 23. On these places see -Schrader, ii. 11, 12. It had been indeed Sennacherib's work "to reduce -fenced cities to ruinous heaps." He boasts on the Bellino Cylinder, -"Their smaller towns without number I overthrew, and reduced them to -heaps of rubbish" (_Records of the Past_, i. 27). - -[584] "It is a prayer without words, a prayer in action, which then -passes into a spoken prayer" (Delitzsch). - -[585] The Assyrians are sometimes represented in their monuments as -hewing idols to pieces in honour of their god Assur (Botta, _Monum._, -pl. 140). - -[586] LXX., [Greek: kinein tn kephaln], "a gesture of scorn" (Psalm -xxii. 7, cix. 25; Lam. ii. 15). With the vaunts of Sennacherib compare -Claudian, _De bell. Geth._, 526-532. - - "Cum cesserit omnis - Obsequiis natura meis? Subsidere nostris - Sub pedibus montes, _arescere vidimus amnes_ ... - Fregi Alpes, _galeis Padum victricibus hausi_." - KEIL, _ad loc._ - - -[587] Comp. 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11 (Heb.); Psalm xxxix. 1; Isa. xxx. 28; -Ezek. xxxviii. 4, xxix. 4. The Assyrians drove a ring through the -lower lip, the Babylonians through the nose. See Rawlinson, _Ancient -Monarchies_, ii. 314, iii. 436. - -[588] 2 Kings xix. 33. "The river of Egypt" (_Nachal-ha-Mizraim_) is -the Wady-el-Arish. - -[589] Isa. x. 33, 34, xi. 1, xiv. 8; Stanley, _Lectures_, ii. 410. - -[590] [Hebrew: 'ot]. A sign "is a thing, an event, or an action -intended as a pledge of the Divine certainty of another. Sometimes it -is a miracle (Gen. iv. 15, Heb.), or a permanent symbol (Isa. viii. -18, xx. 3, xxxvii. 30; Jer. xliv. 29)" (Delitzsch). - -[591] The first year they should eat _saphach_ (LXX., [Greek: -automata]; Vulg., _qu repereris_); the second year, _sachsh_ (LXX., -[Greek: ta anatellonta]; Vulg., _qu sponte nascuntur_). - -[592] 2 Kings xix. 35: "It came to pass that night." Isaiah only has -"then"; Josephus, [Greek: kata tn prtn ts poliorkias nykta]. -Menochius understands it "_in celebri illa nocte_." The LXX. omits -"that," and simply says "in the night" ([Greek: nyktos]). Comp. Psalm -xlvi. 5 (Heb.); Isa. xvii. 14. - -[593] Josephus, followed by many moderns, and even by Keil, suggests a -plague. The malaria of the Pelusiotic marshes easily breeds pestilence. -The "_maleak Jehovah_" is "the destroyer" (_mashchith_) (Exod. xii. 23; -2 Sam. xxiv. 16.) Comp. Justin., xix. 11; Diod. Sic., xix. 434. - -[594] Comp. 2 Sam. xxiv. 15, 16. - -[595] The Babyl. Talmud and some Targums, followed by Vitringa, etc., -attribute to it storms of lightning; Prideaux, Heine, and Faber, to -the simoom; R. Jos, Ussher, etc., to a nocturnal attack of Tirhakah. - -[596] It is, however, perfectly possible that a contingent was left on -guard. "Where is the [past] terror? Where is he that rated the -tribute? Where is he that received it?" (Isa. xxxiii. 18). "At the -noise of the tumult the people flee" (Isa. xxxiii. 3); "At Thy rebuke, -O God of Jacob, both chariot and horse are cast into a dead sleep" -(Psalm lxxvi. 6). Comp. Psalm xlviii. 4-6. - -[597] This is the meaning of "he departed, and went, and returned." - -[598] Not, only fifty-five days, as we read in Tobit i. 21. - -[599] Jos., _Antt._, X. i. 5: "In his own temple to Arask"; LXX., -[Greek: Asarach]; Isa. xxxvii. 38. One guess connects the word with -Nesher, "the eagle-god," often seen on the Assyrian bas-reliefs. -Lenormant calls him "the god of human destiny." - -[600] Alex. Polyhistor _ap._ Euseb., i. 27; Kimchi _ad_ 2 Kings xix. -37. Buxtorf (_Bibl. Rabbinic._) says that Sennacherib entered the -temple to ask his counsellors why Jehovah favoured Israel. Being told -that it was because of Abraham's willingness to offer Isaac, he said, -"Then I will offer my two sons." Rashi adds that they slew him to save -their own lives. (See Schenkel and Riehm, _s.v._ "Sanherib"--both -articles by Schrader). - -[601] See Schrader in Riehm's _Handwrterbuch_, _s.vv._ "Sanherib," -"Asarhaddon." Esarhaddon, judging from what is called "Sennacherib's -will," in which the king leaves him splendid presents, seems to have -been a favourite of his father (_Records of the Past_, i. 136). He -says that on hearing of his father's murder, "I was wrathful as a -lion, and my soul raged within me, and I lifted my hands to the great -gods to assume the sovereignty of my father's house." See Appendix I. - -[602] The Book of Tobit (i. 21) calls him Sarchedonas. - -[603] 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11. - -[604] 2 Chron. xxxii. 23. - -[605] Wellhausen, p. 116. - -[606] Herod., ii. 14. "Sin" (Tanis?), Ezek. xxx. 15. It lay in the -midst of morasses, and some attribute the catastrophe to the malaria. - -[607] The deliverance is really connected with Tirhakah, whose deeds -are recorded in a temple at Medinet Habou, but the jealousy of the -Memphites attributed it to the piety of Sethos. See G. W. Wilkinson, -_Ancient Egyptians_, i. 141; Rawlinson, _Herodotus_, i. 394. - -[608] _Antt._, X. i. 1-5. - -[609] Comp. 1 Sam. v., vi., where, after a plague, the Philistines -sent an expiation of five golden mice. - -[610] We may add that even the Chronicler drops a veil over -Sennacherib's actual capture of fortresses in Judah ("he _thought_ to -win them for himself," 2 Chron. xxxii. 1: comp. 2 Kings xviii. 13; -Isa. xxxvi. 1). - -[611] Isa. vi. 11-13. - -[612] Isa. v. 26-30. - -[613] Isa. vii. 18. - -[614] Isa. viii., xxviii. 1-15, x. 28-34. - -[615] Isa. xiv. 29-32, xxix., xxx. - -[616] Isa. i. 19, 20. - -[617] Isa. x. 33, xxix. 5-8, xxx. 20-26, 30-33. - -[618] Isa. xxxviii. 6. See for this paragraph an admirable chapter in -Prof. Smith's _Isaiah_, pp. 368-374. - -[619] Isa. xlvii. 13. - -[620] Stanley, _Lectures_, ii. 531. - -[621] Isa. xl. 15. - -[622] Isa. xix. 24, 25. - -[623] Ecclus. xlix. 4. - - - - - CHAPTER XXIX - - _MANASSEH_ - - B.C. 686-641 - - 2 KINGS xxi. 1-16 - - "Shall the throne of wickedness have fellowship with Thee, - That frameth mischief by statute? - They gather themselves in troops against the soul of the righteous, - And condemn the innocent blood."--PSALM xciv. 20, 21. - - "Though the mills of God grind slowly, yet they grind - exceeding small; - Though with patience long He waiteth, with exactness grinds - He all." - - -Manasseh was born after Hezekiah's recovery from his terrible illness. -He was but twelve years old when he began to reign. Of his mother -Hephzibah we know nothing, nor of the Zechariah who was her father; -but perhaps Isaiah in one passage (lxii. 4) may refer to her name, "My -delight is in her."[624] The son of Hezekiah and Hephzibah was the -worst of all the kings of Judah, and had the longest reign. - -The tender age of Manasseh when he came to the throne may perhaps -account for the fact that the "forgetfulness" which his name -implied[625] was not a forgetting of other sorrows, but of all that -was noble and righteous in the attempted reformation which had been -the main religious work of his father's life. In Judah, as in England, -a king was not supposed to be of age until he was eighteen.[626] For -six years Manasseh must have been to a great extent under the -influence of his regents and counsellors. - -There always existed in Jerusalem, even in the best times, a -heathenising party, and it was, unfortunately, composed of princes and -aristocrats who could bring strong influence to bear upon the -king.[627] They did not deny Jehovah, but they did not recognise Him -as the sole or the supreme God of heaven and earth. To them He was the -local deity of Israel and Judah. But there were other gods, the gods -of the nations, and their aim always was to recognise the existence of -these deities and to pay homage to their power. If their favour could -not be purchased except by their immediate votaries, at least their -anger might be averted. These politicians advocated a fatal and -incongruous syncretism, or at least an unlimited tolerance for heathen -idols, for which they could, unhappily, quote the precepts and example -of the Wise King, Solomon. If any one questioned their views as a -dangerous idolatry, and an insult to - - "Jehovah thundering out of Zion, throned - Between the cherubim," - -they had but to point from the walls of Jerusalem to the confronting -summit of Olivet, where still remained the shrines which the son of -David had erected three centuries earlier to Chemosh, and Milcom, and -Ashtoreth, who, since his day, had always found, even in Jerusalem, -some worshippers, open or secret, to acknowledge their divinity. - -And these worldlings, in their tolerance for the intolerable, could -always appeal to two powerful instincts of man's fallen -nature--sensuality and fear--"lust hard by hate." There was something -in the worship of Baal-Peor and of Moloch which appealed to the -undying ape and tiger in the unregenerate human heart. - -The true worship of Jehovah is exactly that form of religion which man -finds it least easy to render to Him--the religion of pure morality. -Services, rites, functions, look like religious diligence, and readily -secure a reverent outward devotion. Even self-maceration, fasts, and -flagellation are a cheap way of escaping the "endless torments" which -always loom so hugely in terrifying superstition. - -Such superstitions are children of the fear and faithlessness which hath -torment. They are the corruptions with which every form of false -religion, and with which also a corrupt and perverted Christianity, are -always tainted. And they demand the easy expiation of physical ritual. -But all the best and most spiritual teachers of Scripture--alike the -Hebrew Prophets and the Christian Apostles--are at one with the Lord -Christ in perpetual insistence on the truth that "mercy is better than -sacrifice," and that true religion consists in that good mind and good -life which are the sole proof of genuine sincerity. - -If Jehovah would but be contented with gifts, men would gladly offer -Him thousands of rams and tens of thousands of rivers of oil. But the -prophets taught that He was above all mean bribes, and that such -offerings never could be anything to One whose were all the beasts of -the forests and the cattle upon a thousand hills. It was not easy, -then, to bribe such a God, or to make Him a respecter of persons. - -How easy, again, would it be, if He would even accept human -sacrifices! A child was but a child. How easy to kill a child, and -place it in the brazen arms which sloped over the fiery cistern! -Moloch and Chemosh were supremely to be won by such holocausts; and -surely Moloch and Chemosh must be lords of power! But here again the -prophets of Jehovah stepped in, and said that it was of no avail with -the High, the Holy, the Merciful, to give even our firstborn for our -transgressions, or the fruit of the body for the sin of the soul. - -Asceticism, then--occasional fasting, severe self-deprivations--surely -the gods would accept these? And they were as nothing compared to the -burden of sin and the agony of conscience! Baal and Asherah could -command agonised devotees, and could approve of them. By Jehovah and -His prophets such bodily service is discouraged and forbidden. - -Pleasure, then?--the consecration of the natural impulses, the -devotion in religious cultus of the passions and appetites of the -flesh--why should that be so abhorrent to Jehovah? Other deities -exulted in licentiousness. Was not the temple of Astarte full of her -women-worshippers and of her eunuchs? Was there no fascination in the -voluptuous allurements, the orgiastic dances, the stolen waters, the -bread eaten in secret, when not only was the conscience lulled by the -removal therefrom of all sense of guilt and degradation, but such -orgies were even crowned with merit, as part of an acceptable worship? -After all, there was "a fascination of corruption" in these idols of -gold and jewels, of lust and blood! - -How stern, how cold, how bare, by comparison, was the moral law which -only said, "Thou shalt not," and emphasised its prohibition with the -unalterable sanctions, "This do, and thou shalt live"; "Do it not, and -thou shalt die"! What could they make of a religion which was so -eloquently silent as to the meritoriousness of ritual? - -And how chill and simple and dreary was that which--according to -Micah--Jehovah had shown to be good, and which He required of every -man,--which was nothing more than to do justly, and to love mercy, and -to walk humbly with God! - -And what right had the prophets--so asked these apostates--to lord it -over God's heritage in this way? Solomon was the greatest king of -Israel and Judah; and Solomon had never been so exclusive in his -religionism, though he had built the Temple of the Lord; nor Rehoboam; -nor the great Phoenician Queen Athaliah; nor the cultivated and -sthetic Ahaz; nor, in the kingdom of Israel, the lordly warrior Ahab; -nor the splendid and long-lived victor Jeroboam II. Had not Manasseh -plenty of examples of religious syncretism, to which he might appeal -in the joy of his youthful age? - -Not impossibly there lay in the background another reason why the -young king might be inclined to listen to these evil counsellors. -Micah may still have been living; but of Isaiah we hear no more. -Probably he was dead. It is not recorded that he delivered any -prophecy during the reign of Manasseh, nor is it certain that he -outlived the former king. Tradition, indeed, in later days, asserted -that he had confronted Manasseh, and been doomed to death; that he had -taken refuge in a cedar tree, and in that cedar had been sawn asunder; -but the tradition is wholly without a vestige of authority. One of -Micah's sternest oracles was perhaps uttered in the days of -Manasseh.[628] But Micah was only a provincial prophet of -Moresheth-Gath. He never moved in the midst of princes as Isaiah had -done, or possessed a tithe of the authority which had rested for so -many years on the shoulders of his mighty contemporary. - -Moreover--so the heathen party might suggest--had not Isaiah's -prophecies been falsified by the result? Had he not distinctly -promised and pledged his credit to two things? and had not both turned -out to be unworthy of reliance? - -i. Surely he had prophesied the utter downfall of the Assyrians. And it -was true that after his disaster on the confines of Egypt, Sennacherib -had fled in haste to Nineveh, and his occupations with rebels on his own -frontiers had left Judah unmolested, and he had been murdered by his -sons. But, on the other hand, in no sense of the word had Assyria -fallen. On the contrary, she had never been more powerful. Not one of -his predecessors had seemed more irresistible than Esarhaddon. He was -undisputed king of Babylon and of Nineveh. There would be no more -embassies from Merodach-Baladan, or any revolted viceroy! And rumour -would early begin to narrate that Esarhaddon had not forgotten the -catastrophe at Pelusium, but intended to avenge it, and to teach Egypt -the forgotten lessons of Raphia (B.C. 720) and Altaqu (B.C. 701). - -ii. And as for Judah, where was the golden Messianic age which Isaiah -had promised? Where did they see the Divine Prince whom he had -foretold, or the lion lying down with the lamb, and the child laying -his hand on the cockatrice's den? - -All this, they would argue, had greatly shaken Isaiah's prophetic -authority. Judah was a mere vassal--safe only in so far as she -remained a vassal, and did not join Tyre or any other rebellious -power, but abode safe under the shadow of Assyria's mighty wings. - -Was it not, then, as well to look facts in the face? to accept things -as they were? And--so they would argue, with false plausibility--since -the triumph, after all, had remained with the gods of the nations, -might it not be as well to dethrone Jehovah from His exclusive -dominion, and at least to propitiate the potent and less-exacting -deities, the charming _D faciles_ who smiled at lewd aberrations, and -even flung over them the glamour of devotion? - -With these bolder renegades would be the whole body of the priests of -the _bamoth_. Those old sanctuaries had been repressed by Hezekiah -without any compensation; for in those days life-interests were -little, or not at all, regarded. Multitudes of priests and Levites -must have been flung out of employment and reduced to poverty by the -recent religious revolution. It is not likely that they bore without a -murmur the obliteration of forms of worship sanctioned by immemorial -custom, or that they made no efforts to procure the re-establishment -of what the people loved. - -Thus a vast weight of evil influence was brought to bear upon the -boy-king; and it was also the more powerful because repeated -indications exist that, while the king was nominally a despot, and was -surrounded with external observance, the real control of affairs was, -to a large extent, in the hands of an aristocracy of priests and -princes, except when the king was a man of great personal force. - -Manasseh went over to these retrogressionists heart and soul, and he -contentedly remained a tributary of Assyria. Even when Esarhaddon's -forces marched to the chastisement of Egypt, he felt secure in his -allegiance to the dominant tyrant of Babylon and Nineveh, whose -interest it would be not to disturb a faithful subject. - -There followed a reaction, an absolute rebound from the old -monotheistic strictness and righteousness. The nation emancipated -itself from the moral law as with a shout of relief, and plunged into -superstition and licentiousness. The reign of Manasseh resembled at -once the recrudescence of Popery in the reign of Mary Tudor, with its -rekindling of the fires of Smithfield, and the foul orgies of -debauchery at the Restoration of 1660, when human nature, loving -degraded licence better than strenuous liberty, flung away the noble -freedom of Puritanism for the loathly mysteries of Cotytto. The age of -Manasseh resembled that of Charles II., in the famous description of -Lord Macaulay. "Then came days never to be recalled without a blush, -the days of servitude without loyalty, and sensuality without love, of -dwarfish talents and gigantic vices, the paradise of cold hearts and -narrow minds, the golden age of the coward, the bigot, and the slave. -In every high place worship was paid to Belial and Moloch, and England -propitiated these obscene and cruel idols with the blood of her best -and bravest children." Sensuous intoxication is in all cases closely -connected with fiendish cruelty, and the introducer of voluptuous -idolatries naturally became the first persecutor of the true religion. - -1. The first step of the king, and probably the one which the people -welcomed most, was the restoration of the chapelries under the trees -and on the hills, which, more strenuously than any of his -predecessors, Hezekiah had at least attempted to put down. For this -step Manasseh might have pleaded the sanction of ages to which the -Book of Deuteronomy had either been wholly unknown, or during which -its laws had become as utterly forgotten as though they had never -existed. To many worshippers these old shrines had become extremely -precious. They felt it to be either an actual impossibility, or at the -best intolerably burdensome, to make their way by long, dreary, and -difficult journeys to Jerusalem, when they desired to pay the most -ordinary rites of worship. They knew no reason, and had never known of -any reason, why Jehovah should be worshipped in one Temple only. All -their religious instincts led them the other way. They could point to -the example of all the highly honoured saints who had worshipped God -at Gilgal, Shechem, Bethel, Hebron, Beersheba, Kedesh, Gibeah, and -many another shrine; and of all the saintly kings who had not dreamt -of interfering with such free worship. Why should Jerusalem monopolise -all sanctity? It might be a politic view for kings to maintain, and -highly profitable for priests to establish; but none of their great -prophets, not even the princely Isaiah, had said one syllable against -the innocent high places of Jehovah. In those days there were no -synagogues. The extinction of the high places doubtless seemed to many -of the people an extinction of religion in daily life, and they were -more than half disposed to agree with the Rabshakeh that Jehovah was -offended by what they regarded as a burdensome, unwise, and sweeping -innovation.--If it be necessary to answer arguments which might have -seemed natural, against a custom which might have seemed innocent, it -must suffice to say that it was the chief mission of Israel to keep -alive among the nations of the world the knowledge of the One True -God, and that, amid the constant temptations to accept the gods of the -heathen as they were adored in groves and on high places, the faith of -Israel could no longer be kept pure except by the Deuteronomic -institution of one central and exclusive shrine. - -2. But Manasseh did far worse than rehabilitate the worship at the high -places which his father had discouraged. "He reared up altars for -Baal,[629] and made an Asherah, as did Ahab, King of Israel." This was -the first bad element of the new cosmopolitan eclecticism. It involved -the acceptance of the Phoenician nature-worship with its manifold -abominations. The people had grown familiar with it under Athaliah (2 -Kings xi. 18), and under Ahaz (2 Chron. xxviii. 2); but Manasseh, as we -infer from the account given of Josiah's reformation, had gone further -than either. He had actually ventured to introduce the image of Baal -into the Temple, and to set up the Asherah-pillar in front of it (2 -Kings xxiii. 4). Worse even than this, he had erected in the very -Temple (_id._ 7) houses devoted to the execrable _Qedeshim_ (Vulg., -_effeminati_), in which also the women wove broidered hangings to adorn -the shrines of the idol image, as in the worship of the Assyrian -Mylitta.[630] He, at the same time, displaced the altar and removed the -Ark. To the latter circumstances is perhaps due the Rabbinic legend that -Hezekiah hid the Ark till the coming of the Messiah. - -3. To this Phoenician worship he added Sabaism, the worship of the -stars, "all the host of heaven, whom he served." This was an entirely -new phase of idolatry, unknown to the Hebrews till they came in -contact with Assyria.[631] It came rapidly into vogue, and exercised -over their imaginations the spell of a seductive novelty, as we see -from the strong testimony of the prophet Jeremiah.[632] This is why it -is so emphatically forbidden in the Book of Deuteronomy.[633] The king -built altars to the stars of the Zodiac (_Mazzaroth_), both in the -outer court of the Temple, and in the court of the priests, and on -these altars incense or victims were continually burned. He also -introduced or encouraged the introduction into the Temple precincts of -the horses and chariots dedicated to the sun.[634] - -When we read of the actual invasion of the Temple-precincts in this as -in preceding and subsequent reigns, we cannot but ask, Were these -atrocities committed with the sanction or with the connivance of the -priests? We are not told. Yet how can it have been otherwise? If the -high priest Azariah could muster eighty priests to oppose King Uzziah, -when he merely wished to burn incense in the Temple, as Solomon had -done before him, and as Ahaz did after him--if Jehoiada could, -according to the Chronicler, muster a perfect army of priests and -Levites to dethrone Athaliah, and could so stir up the people that -they rose _en masse_ to tear down the temple of Baal, and slay Mattan, -his high priest,--how was it possible for Manasseh to perpetrate these -flagrant acts of idolatrous apostasy, if the priests were all ranged -in opposition to his power? Was their authority suddenly paralysed? -Did their influence with the people shrivel into nothing when Hezekiah -had been carried to his tomb? Or did these priests follow the easy and -profitable course which they seem to have followed throughout the -whole history of the kings without an exception?--did they simply -answer the kings according to their idols? - -4. Another, and the most hideous, element of the new mixture of cults -was the reintroduction of the ancient Canaanite worship of Moloch with -its human sacrifices. Manasseh, like Ahaz, made his son or, according -to the Chronicler and the Septuagint, "his sons"--pass through the -fire to this grim Ammonite idol in Tophet of the Valley of Hinnom, so -as to leave no chance untried. And herein he was far more inexcusable -than his grandfather; for Ahaz had at least been driven by desperate -extremity to this last expedient, but Manasseh was living, if not in -prosperity, at least in unbroken peace. Moreover, he not only did this -himself, but did his utmost to make a popular institution of -children-sacrifice, so that many practised it in the dreadful valley -and amid the rocks outside Jerusalem.[635] - -5. Even this did not suffice him. To these Assyrian, Phoenician, and -Canaanite elements of idolatry he added Babylonian novelties. He -practised augury, and used enchantments, and he dealt with familiar -spirits and wizards, as though without Egyptian necromancy and -Mesopotamian shamanism his eclectic worship would be incomplete.[636] - -6. Thus "he wrought much wickedness in the sight of the Lord to -provoke Him to anger." He placed a graven image of his Asherah inside -the Temple, and utterly profaned the sacred house, and seduced his -people "to do more evil than did the nations whom the Lord destroyed -before the children of Israel." - -Whatever was the conduct of the priests, the prophets were not silent. -They denounced Manasseh for having done worse than even the ancient -Amorites, and declared that, in consequence of his crimes, God would -bring upon Jerusalem such evil as would cause both the ears of him -that heard it to tingle;[637] that he would stretch over Jerusalem for -ruin the line and the level of Ahab;[638] that He would cast off even -the remnant, and deliver them to their enemies; that He would wipe out -Jerusalem "as a man wipeth a dish, wiping and turning it upside -down."[639] - -The finest oracles of Micah (vi. 1-vii. 7) were probably uttered in the -reign of Manasseh, and give the simplest and purest expression to the -supremacy of morality as the one true end and test of religion. Micah is -as indifferent as the Decalogue to all claims of rites, ceremonies, and -outward worship. "Jehovah demands nothing for Himself; all that He asks -is for man: this is the fundamental law of the theocracy." - -The apostasies of the king and the denunciation of the prophets thus -came into fierce collision, and led naturally to persecution and -bloodshed. Perhaps in Mic. vii. 1-7 we catch the echoes of the Reign -of Terror. The king resorted to violence, using, no doubt, the -tyrant's devilish plea of necessity. He made blood run like water in -the streets of Jerusalem from end to end,[640] and in the exaggerated -phrase of Josephus, was _daily_ slaying the prophets.[641] It was -during this persecution, according to Rabbinic tradition, that Isaiah -received the martyr's crown.[642] - -And no miracles were wrought to save the martyrs. Elijah and Elisha -had been surrounded with a blaze of miracles, but in Judah no prophet -arose who could so wield the power of Heaven. - -At this point the narrative of the historian about Manasseh ends. If -he shared the current opinion of his day, which connected individual -and national prosperity with well-doing, and regarded length of days -as a sign of the favour of Heaven, while, on the other hand, -misfortune and misery invariably resulted from the wrath of Jehovah, -he could not have been otherwise than surprised, and perhaps even -pained, to have to relate that Manasseh reigned fifty-five years. Not -only was his reign longer than that of any other king of Israel or -Judah; not only did he attain a greater age than any of them; but, -further, no calamity seems to have marked his rule. A contented and -protected vassal of Esarhaddon, secure from his attacks, and also -unmolested by the weakened and subjugated nations around him, he would -seem, in the story of the Kings, to have enjoyed an enviable external -lot, and to have presided over a people who were happy, in that, -during his rule, they had no history. But whatever the writer may have -felt, he tells us no more, and lets us see Manasseh sink peacefully -into his grave "in the garden of his own house, in the garden of -Uzza," and leave to his son Amon a peaceful realm and an undisputed -crown. Such a career would undoubtedly perplex and confound all the -preconceived opinions of Jewish orthodoxy. The prosperity of Manasseh -would have presented as great a problem to them as the miseries of -Job. They looked to temporal prosperity as the reward of -righteousness, and to acute misery as the retribution of apostasy and -sin. They had little or no conception of a future which should redress -the balance of apparent earthly inequalities. Alike the sight of -Manasseh's long reign and Josiah's undeserved death in battle would -give a powerful shock to their fixed convictions. - -Far different is the end of the story in the Book of Chronicles. The -records of Esarhaddon tell us that in 680 he made an expedition into -Palestine to restore the shaken influence of his father,[643] and -about 647 he mentions among his submissive tributaries the kings of -Tyre, Edom, Moab, Gaza, Ekron, Askelon, Gebal, Ammon, Ashdod, and -Manasseh, King of Judah ("Minasi-sar-Yahudi"), as well as ten princes -of Cyprus. Whether the King of Judah rebelled later on, and intrigued -with Tirhakah, we do not know; but in 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11 we read that -Esarhaddon sent his generals to Jerusalem, took Manasseh by stratagem, -drove rings through his lips, bound him in chains, and brought him to -Babylon, where Esarhaddon was holding his court.[644] We find from the -_Eponym Canon_ that Tyre revolted from Assyria in the tenth year of -Esarhaddon, and Manasseh may have been drawn away to join in the -revolt; or he may have joined Shamash-shum-ukn, the Viceroy of -Babylon, in his revolt against his brother Assurbanipal. As a rule, -the lot of a conquered vassal at the Assyrian Court was horrible, and -in his utter misery Manasseh repented, humbled himself, and -prayed.[645] His prayer was heard. The despots of Nineveh were -capricious alike in their insults and in their favours, and -Esarhaddon not only pardoned Manasseh, but sent him back to -Jerusalem,[646] thinking that he would be more useful to him there -than in a Babylonian dungeon. After this reprieve he lived like a -penitent and a patriot. Esarhaddon was preparing for his expedition -against Tirhakah, and would not attack a king who was now bound to him -by gratitude as well as fear. But the times were very troublous. -Manasseh prepared for eventualities by building an outer wall on the -west of the city of David, unto Gihon in the Valley, by surrounding -Ophel with a high wall, and by garrisoning the fenced cities.[647] All -this was necessary and patriotic work, considering that Judah might be -attacked by other enemies as well as the Assyrians. She was like a -grain of corn amid the grinding mills of the nations. Media and Lydia -were rising into strong kingdoms. Babylon was becoming daily more -formidable. Dim rumours reached the East of movements among vast hosts -of Cimmerian and Scythian barbarians. Jerusalem had no human strength -for war. She could only rely upon her battlements, on the natural -strength of her position, and on the protection of her God. Almost in -the last year of Manasseh, the powerful Psammetichus I., king of a now -united Egypt, made an assault on Ashdod; but he did not venture on the -difficult task of besieging Jerusalem. - -The religious reformation of Manasseh attested the sincerity of his -amendment. He flung out the Asherah from the Temple, put away the -strange gods, destroyed the altars, burnt sacrifices to God, and used -all his power to restore the worship of Jehovah. He did not, however, -destroy the high places. For this story the Chronicler refers to "the -words of Chozai,"[648] according to the present text, which some -suppose to have meant "the story of the Seers." He also refers to a -prayer of Manasseh, which cannot of course be the Greek forgery of the -second or third century which goes by that name in the Apocrypha.[649] -His repentance doubtless secured his own salvation. "Whoso saith -'Manasseh hath no part in the world to come,'" said Rabbi Johanan, -"discourageth the penitent";--but the partial reformation was too late -to save his land. - -Is this a literal history, or an edifying Haggadah? The non-historical -character of the story is maintained by De Wette, Graf, Nldeke, and -many others. Both views have been taken. This we can, at any rate, -assert--that there seems to be nothing in the story which is -inconsistent with probability. The Chronicler may have derived it from -genuine documents or traditions, though it is difficult to account for -the silence of the elder and more trustworthy historian. Nor is it -only his silence for which we have to account; it is the continuance -of his positive statements. It would be, in any case, a strange -conception of history which, after narrating a man's crimes, omitted -alike the retribution which befell him on account of them, the -heartfelt penitence for the sake of which they were forgiven, and the -seriously earnest endeavour to undo at least something of the evil -which he had done. Not only does the historian make these omissions, -but in no subsequent allusion to Manasseh does he so much as indicate -that he is aware of his amendment.[650] He says that Amon "did evil in -the sight of the Lord, as his father Manasseh did."[651] He speaks of -the altars to the hosts of heaven which Manasseh had made in the two -courts of the Temple as still standing in the reign of Josiah, though -the Chronicler tells us that Manasseh had cast them all out of the -city.[652] He says that, notwithstanding all that Josiah did, "the -Lord turned not from the fierceness of His great wrath, because of all -the provocations that Manasseh had provoked Him withal,"[653] and that -on this account God cast off Jerusalem. Never, even by the most -distant allusions, does he refer to Manasseh's captivity, his prayer, -his penitence, or his counter-efforts. Had he been aware of these, his -silence would have been neither generous nor just. Nay, he even leaves -apparent facts at conflict with the Chronicler's story, for he makes -Josiah do all that the Chronicler tells us that Manasseh himself had -done in the removal of his worst abominations. - -Even now we have not exhausted the historic difficulties which -surround the repentance of Manasseh. During his reign Jeremiah -received his call, and while still a young boy began his work. Neither -he, nor Zephaniah, nor Habakkuk drop the slightest hint that the -wicked, idolatrous king had ever turned over a new leaf. Jeremiah's -silence is specially difficult to account for. He, too, records -Jehovah's final and irrevocable decree, that He would give up Judah to -death, to exile, and to famine, to the sword to slay, to the dogs to -tear, to the fowls of the heaven and the beasts of the earth to devour -and to destroy.[654] And the cause of the pitiless doom pronounced by -a Judge weary of repenting is "because of Manasseh, the son of -Hezekiah, King of Judah, for that which he did in Jerusalem."[655] - -The judgment was not long delayed. - -It was the vast movement of the Scythians in Media and Western Asia, -and the rumours of it, which gave to Manasseh and Amon such respite as -they had; and even this respite was full of misery and fear.[656] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[624] One legend says that Hephzibah was a daughter of Isaiah. Not so -Josephus (_Antt._, X. iii. 1). - -[625] See Gen. xli. 51. His name may have referred to the new union -between the Northern and Southern Kingdoms. Comp. 2 Chron. xxx. 6, -xxxi. 1. - -[626] Chron. xxxiv. 1-3. - -[627] See Zeph. i. 8. Comp. 2 Chron. xxiv. 17; Isa. xxviii. 14; Jer. -v. 5, etc. - -[628] Mic. vii. 1-20. - -[629] LXX., [Greek: t Baal]. The feminine, however, does not imply -that Baal was here worshipped as a female deity, but is probably due -to the fact that later Jews always avoided using the _names_ of idols -(from a misapprehension or too literal view of Exod. xxiii. 13), and -therefore called Baal _Bosheth_ ("shame"), which is feminine. Hence -the names Mephibosheth, Jerubbesheth, Ishbosheth. In Suidas (_s.v._ -[Greek: Manasss]) he is charged with having set up in the Temple "a -four-faced image of Zeus." - -[630] For [Hebrew: battim], in 2 Kings xxiii. 7, the LXX. read [Greek: -chettim] (?). Grtz, (_Gesch. d. Juden._, ii. 277) suggests [Hebrew: -benadim], "broidered robes." Ezek. xvi. 16. See Herod., i. 199; -Strabo, xvi. 1058; Luc., _De De. Syr._, 6; Libanius, _Opp._, xi. -456, 557; _Ep. of Jeremy_, 43; Dllinger, _Judenthum u. Heidenthum_, -i. 431; Rawlinson, _Phoenicia_, 431. - -[631] Chron. xxxiii. 3; 2 Kings xxiii. 5. Movers, _Rel. d. Phniz._, i. -65 "In all the books of the Old Testament written before the Assyrian -period no trace of star-worship is to be to found." 2 Kings xvii. 16. - -[632] Jer. vii. 18, viii. 2, xix. 13; Zeph. i, 5. - -[633] See Deut. iv. 19, xvii. 3. - -[634] 2 Kings xxiii. 11, 12. - -[635] See Jer. vii, 31, 32, xix. 2-6, xxxii. 35; Psalm cvi. 37, 38. - -[636] Ewald infers from Isa. lvii. 5-9; Jer. ii. 5-13, that he actually -_sought_ for all foreign kinds of worship, in order to introduce them. - -[637] 1 Sam. iii. 11; Jer. xix. 3. - -[638] Comp. Isa. xxxiv. 11; Lam. ii. 8. - -[639] 2 Kings xxi. 13. LXX., [Greek: alabastros], _al._ [Greek: -pyxion]. The Vulgate also takes it to mean the obliteration of writing -on a tablet: "Delebo Jerusalem sicut deleri solent tabul; et ducam -crebrius stylum super faciem ejus." - -[640] 2 Kings xxi. 16; Heb., "from mouth to mouth"; LXX., [Greek: -stoma eis stoma]; Vulg., _donec impleret Jerusalem usque ad os_. Comp. -2 Kings x. 21. - -[641] _Antt._, X. iii, 1: "He butchered alike all the just among the -Hebrews." To this reign of terror some refer Psalm xii. 1; Isa. lvii. -1-4. - -[642] This (as I have said) cannot be regarded as certain. Isaiah -began to prophesy in the year that King Uzziah died, sixty years -before Manasseh. It is a Jewish Haggadah. See Gesen on Isa. i., p. 9, -and the Apocryphal "Ascension of Isaiah." - -[643] Esarhaddon reigned only eight years, till 668, and then resigned -in favour of his son Assurbanipal. In his reign Psammetichus recovered -Egypt, and put an end to the Dodecarchy. In the reign of his -successor, Assuredililani, Assyria began to decline (647-625). - -[644] Comp. Isa. xxxix. 6; Jos., _Antt._, X. iii. 2. The phrase "among -the thorns" means "_with rings_" (comp. Isa. xxx. 28, xxxvii. 29; -Ezek. xxxviii. 4; Amos iv. 2). Assurbanipal says similarly that he -seized Necho, "bound him with bonds and iron chains, hands and feet," -but afterwards allowed him to return to Egypt (Schrader, ii. 59). - -[645] Late and worthless Haggadoth, echoed by still later writers -(Suidas and Syncellus), say he was kept in a brazen cage, fed on bran -bread dipped in vinegar, etc. See _Apost. Constt._, ii. 22: "And the -Lord hearkened to his voice, and there became about him a flame of -fire, and all the irons about him melted." John Damasc., _Parall._, -ii. 15, quotes from Julius Africanus, that while Manasseh was saying a -psalm his iron bonds burst, and he escaped. See _Speakers Commentary_, -on Apocrypha, ii. 363. - -[646] Such pardon from a king of Assyria was rare, but not -unparalleled. Pharaoh Necho I. was taken in chains to Nineveh, and -afterwards set free (Schrader, _K. A. T._, p. 371). - -[647] See 2 Chron. xxvii. 3. The "fish gate" was, perhaps, a weak -point (Zeph. i. 10). - -[648] 2 Chron. xxxiii. 19. Heb., _dibhr Chozai_; A.V., "the story of -the Seers"; R.V., "in the history of Hozai"; LXX., [Greek: epi tn -logn tn ouranin]; Vulg., _in sermonibus Hozai_. The elements of -doubt suggested by the name "Babylon," and by the liberation of -Manasseh, have been removed by further knowledge. See Budge, _Hist. of -Esarhaddon_, p. 78; Schrader, _K. A. T._, 369 ff. - -[649] Since the Council of Trent this prayer has been relegated to the -end of the Vulgate with 3, 4, Esdras. Verse 8 (the supposed sinlessness -of the Patriarchs) at once shows it to be a mere composition. - -[650] 2 Kings xxiii. 12. - -[651] 2 Kings xxi. 20. - -[652] 2 Chron. xxxiii. 15. - -[653] 2 Kings xxiii. 26. - -[654] Jer. xv. 1-9. - -[655] The later Jews certainly took no account of his repentance. His -name was execrated (see the substitution of Manasseh for Moses in -Judg. xviii. 30), and he was denied all part in the world to come. The -Apocryphal "Prayer of Manasses" has no authority, though it is -interesting (Butler, _Analogy_, pt. ii., ch. v.). - -[656] In estimating the Chronicler's story, we cannot wholly forget the -fact that a number of Haggadic legends clustered thickly round the name -of Manasseh in the literature of the later Jews. He is charged with -incest, with the murder of Isaiah, the distortion of Scripture, etc., -and is represented as having got to heaven, not by real repentance, but -by challenging God on His superiority to idols. The Targum, after 2 -Chron. xxxiii. 11, adds, "And the Chaldees made a copper mule, and -pierced it all over with little holes, and put him therein. And when he -was in straits, he cried in vain to all his idols. Then he prayed to -Jehovah and humbled himself; but the angels shut every window and -lattice of heaven, that his prayer might not enter. But forthwith the -pity of the Lord of the world rolled forth, and He made an aperture in -heaven, and the mule burst asunder, and the Spirit breathed on him, and -he forsook all his idols." "No books," says Dr. Neubauer, "are more -subject to additions and various adaptations than popular histories." -See Mr. Ball's commentary (_Speaker's Commentary_, ii. 309, and -_Sanhedrin_, f. 99, 2; 101, 1; 103, 2). - - - - - _AMON_[657] - - B.C. 641-639 - - 2 KINGS xxi. 19-26 - -The brief reign of Amon is only a sort of unimportant and miserable -annex to that of his father. As he was twenty-two years old when he -began to reign, he must have witnessed the repentance and reforming zeal -of his father, if, in spite of all difficulties, we assume that -narrative to be historical. In that case, however, the young man was -wholly untouched by the latter phase of Manasseh's life, and flung -himself headlong into the career of the king's earlier idolatries. "He -walked in all the way that his father walked in, and served the idols -that his father served, and worshipped them"--which was the more -extraordinary if Manasseh's last acts had been to dethrone and destroy -these strange gods. He even "multiplied trespass," so that in his son's -reign we find every form of abomination as triumphant as though Manasseh -had never attempted to check the tide of evil. We know nothing more of -Amon. Apparently he only reigned two years.[658] He is the only Jewish -king who bears the name of a foreign--an Egyptian--deity. - -For pictures of the state of things in this reign we may look to the -prophets Zephaniah and Jeremiah, and they are forced to use the -darkest colours. - -This is Zephaniah's picture:-- - - "Woe to her that is rebellious and polluted, to the oppressing city! - She obeyed not the voice; she received not instruction; - She trusted not in the Lord; she drew not near to her God. - Her princes in the midst of her are roaring lions; - Her judges are evening wolves; they gnaw not the bones on the morrow. - Her prophets are light and treacherous persons: - Her priests have profaned the sanctuary, they have done violence to - the law."[659] - -He tells us that Baal and his black-robed _chemarim_[660] are still -prevalent--that men worshipped on their house-tops the host of heaven, -and swore by "Moloch their king." Therefore would God search Jerusalem -with candles, and would visit the men who had sunk, like thick wine on -the lees, and who said in their infidel hearts, "Jehovah will not do -good, neither will He do evil." He is an Epicurean God, a cypher, a -_fainant_. "Men make all kinds of fine calculations," says Luther, -"but the Lord God says to them, 'For whom, then, do you hold Me? For a -cypher? Do I sit here in vain, and to no purpose? You shall know that -I will turn their accounts about finely, and make them all false -reckonings.'" - -Not less dark is the view of Jeremiah.[661] Like Diogenes in Athens, -Jeremiah in vain searches Jerusalem for a faithful man. Among the poor -he finds brutish obstinacy, among the rich insolent defiance. They -were like fed horses in the morning--lecherous and unruly. They are -slanderers, adulterers, corrupters, murderers. They worship Baal and -strange gods. "They set a trap, they catch men. As a cage is full of -birds, so are their houses full of deceit. They are waxen fat, they -shine; yea, they overpass in deeds of wickedness."[662] "An -astonishment and horror is done in the land; the prophets prophesy -falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and My people love -to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?"[663] - -"From the least of them even unto the greatest of them every one is -given to covetousness; and from the prophet even unto the priest every -one dealeth falsely. They have treated also the hurt of My people -lightly, saying, 'Peace, peace,' when there is no peace. Were they -ashamed when they had committed abominations? Nay, they were not at -all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore shall they fall among -them that fall."[664] - -The wretched reign ended wretchedly. Amon met the fate of Amaziah and -of Joash. He was murdered by conspirators--by some of his own -courtiers--in his own palace. He was not the victim of any general -rebellion. The people of the land were apparently content with the -existent idolatry, which left them free for lives of lust and luxury, -of greed and gain. They resented the disorder introduced by an -intrigue of eunuchs or court officials. They rose and slew the whole -band of conspirators. Amon was buried with his father in the new -burial-place of the Kings in the garden of Uzza, and the people placed -his son Josiah--a child of eight years old--upon the throne. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[657] The name Amon is unusual. Some identify it with the name of the -Egyptian sun-god (Nah. iii. 8). If so, we see yet another element of -Manasseh's syncretism, and (as some fancy) an attempt to open -relations with Psammetichus of Egypt. But perhaps the name may be -Hebrew for "Architect" (1 Kings xxii. 26; Neh. vii. 59). - -[658] 2 Kings xxi. 19. The LXX. reads "twelve years," but not so -Josephus (_Antt._, X. iv. 1), or 2 Chron. xxxiii. 21. - -[659] Zeph. iii. 1-11. Comp. i. 4. - -[660] _Chemarim_, 2 Kings xxiii. 5; Hos. x. 5. The root in Syriac -means "to be sad," but Kimchi derives it from a root "to be black." -The Vulgate renders it _ditui_ and _aruspices_. - -[661] We are told in the titles of their books that both these -prophets prophesied in the days of Josiah; but such pictures can only -apply to the earliest years of his reign. - -[662] See Jer. v., vi., vii., _passim_. - -[663] Jer. vi. 13-15. - -[664] Jer. v. 30, 31. - - - - - CHAPTER XXX - - _JOSIAH_ - - B.C. 639-608[665] - - 2 KINGS xii., xxiii - - [Greek: "Tn de physin autos aristos hyprche kai pros aretn heu - gegons."]--Jos., _Antt._, iv. 1. - - "In outline dim and vast - Their fearful shadows cast - The giant forms of Empires, on their way - To ruin: one by one - They tower, and they are gone." - KEBLE. - - -If we are to understand the reign of Josiah as a whole, we must preface -it by some allusion to the great epoch-marking circumstances of his age, -which explain the references of contemporary prophets, and which, in -great measure, determined the foreign policy of the pious king. - -The three memorable events of this brief epoch were, (I.) the movement -of the Scythians, (II.) the rise of Babylon, and (III.) the -humiliation of Nineveh, followed by her total destruction. - -I. Many of Jeremiah's earlier prophecies belong to this period, and we -see that both he and Zephaniah--who was probably a great-great-grandson -of King Hezekiah himself,[666] and prophesied in this reign[667]--are -greatly occupied with a danger from the North which seems to threaten -universal ruin. - -So overwhelming is the peril that Zephaniah begins with the -tremendously sweeping menace, "_I will utterly consume all things off -the earth_, saith the Lord." - -Then the curse rushes down specifically upon Judah and Jerusalem; and -the state of things which the prophet describes shows that, if Josiah -began himself to seek the Lord at eight years old, he did not -take--and was, perhaps, unable to take--any active steps towards the -extinction of idolatry till he was old enough to hold in his own hand -the reins of power. - -For Zephaniah denounces the wrath of Jehovah on three classes of -idolaters--viz., (1) the remnant of Baal-worshippers with their -_chemarim_, or unlawful priests, and the syncretising priests -(_kohanim_) of Jehovah, who combine His worship with that of the stars, -to whom they burn incense upon the housetops; (2) the waverers, who -swear at once by Jehovah and by Malcham, their king; and (3) the open -despisers and apostates. For all these the day of Jehovah is near; He -has prepared them for sacrifice, and the sacrificers are at hand.[668] -Gaza, Ashdod, Askelon, Ekron, the Cherethites, Canaan, Philistia, are -all threatened by the same impending ruin, as well as Moab and Ammon, -who shall lose their lands. Ethiopia, too, and Assyria shall be smitten, -and Nineveh shall become so complete a desolation that "pelicans and -hedgehogs shall bivouac upon her chapiters, the owl shall hoot in her -windows, and the crow croak upon the threshold, 'Crushed! desolated!' -and all that pass by shall hiss and wag their hands."[669] - -The pictures of the state of society drawn by Jeremiah do not, as we -have seen, differ from those drawn by his contemporary.[670] Jeremiah, -too, writing perhaps before Josiah's reformation, complains that God's -people have forsaken the fountains of living water, to hew out for -themselves broken cisterns. He complains of empty formalism in the place -of true righteousness, and even goes so far as to say that backsliding -Israel has shown herself more righteous than treacherous Judah (iii. -1-11). He, too, prophesies speedy and terrific chastisement. Let Judah -gather herself into fenced cities, and save her goods by flight, for God -is bringing evil from the North, and a great destruction.[671] - -"The lion is come up from his thicket, and the destroyer of the -nations is on his way; he is gone forth from his place to make thy -land desolate; and thy cities shall be laid waste, without an -inhabitant. Behold, he cometh as clouds, and his chariots shall be as -the whirlwind." Besiegers come from a far country, and give out their -voice against the cities of Judah. The heart of the kings shall -perish, and the heart of the princes; and the priests shall be -astonished, and the prophets shall wonder. - -"For thus hath the Lord said, The whole land shall be desolate; yet -will I not make a full end"--and, "O Jerusalem, wash thine heart from -wickedness, that thou mayest be saved!"[672] - -"I will bring a nation upon you from far, O House of Israel, saith the -Lord: it is a mighty nation, it is an ancient nation, a nation whose -language"--unlike that of the Assyrians--"thou knowest not, neither -understandest what they say. Their quiver is an open sepulchre, they -are all mighty men. They shall batter thy fenced cities, in which thou -trustest with weapons of war."[673] - -"O ye children of Benjamin, save your goods by flight: for evil is -imminent from the North, and a great destruction. Behold, a people -cometh from the North Country, and a great nation shall be raised from -the farthest part of the earth. They lay hold on bow and spear; they are -cruel, and have no mercy; their voice roareth like the sea; and they -ride upon horses, set in array as men for war against thee, O daughter -of Zion. We have heard the fame thereof: our hands wax feeble."[674] - -And the judgment is close at hand. The early blossoming bud of the -almond tree is the type of its imminence. The seething caldron, with -its front turned from the North, typifies an invasion which shall soon -boil over and flood the land.[675] - -What was the fierce people thus vaguely indicated as coming from the -North? The foes indicated in these passages are not the long-familiar -Assyrians, but the Scythians and Cimmerians.[676] - -As yet the Hebrews had only heard of them by dim and distant rumour. -When Ezekiel prophesied they were still an object of terror, but he -foresees their defeat and annihilation. They should be gathered into -the confines of Israel, but only for their destruction.[677] The -prophet is bidden to set his face towards Gog, of the land of Magog, -the Prince of Rosh,[678] Meshech, and Tubal, and prophesy against him -that God would turn him about, and put hooks in his jaws, and drive -forth all his army of bucklered and sworded horsemen, the hordes of -the uttermost part of the North. They should come like a storm upon -the mountains of Israel, and spoil the defenceless villages; but they -should come simply for their own destruction by blood and by -pestilence. God should smite their bows out of their left hands, and -their arrows out of the right, and the ravenous birds of Israel should -feed upon the carcases of their warriors. There should be endless -bonfires of all the instruments of war, and the place of their burial -should be called "the valley of the multitude of Gog." - -Much of this is doubtless an ideal picture, and Ezekiel may be -thinking of the fall of the Chaldans. But the terms he uses remind us -of the dim Northern nomads, and the names Rosh and Meshech in -juxtaposition involuntarily recall those of Russia and Moscow.[679] - -Our chief historical authority respecting this influx of Northern -barbarians is Herodotus.[680] He tells us that the nomad Scythians, -apparently a Turanian race, who may have been subjected to the pressure -of population, swarmed over the Caucasus, dispossessed the Cimmerians -(Gomer), and settled themselves in Saccasene, a province of Northern -Armenia. From this province the Scythians gained the name of the Saqu. -The name of Gog seems to be taken from Gugu, a Scythian prince, who was -taken captive by Assurbanipal from the land of the Saqu.[681] Magog is -perhaps Mat-gugu, "land of Gog." These rude, coarse warriors, like the -hordes of Attila, or Zenghis Khan, or Tamerlane--who were descended from -them--magnetised the imagination of civilised people, as the Huns did -in the fourth century.[682] They overthrew the kingdom of Urartis -(Armenia), and drove the all-but exterminated remnant of the Moschi and -Tabali to the mountain-fortresses by the Black Sea, turning them, as it -were, into a nation of ghosts in Sheol.[683] Then they burst like a -thunder-cloud on Mesopotamia, desolating the villages with their -arrow-flights, but too unskilled to take fenced towns. They swept down -the Shephelah of Palestine, and plundered the rich temple of Aphrodite -(Astarte Ourania) at Askelon, thereby incurring the curse of the goddess -in the form of a strange disease. But on the borders of Egypt they were -diplomatically met by Psammetichus (_d._ 611) with gifts and prayers. -Judah seems only to have suffered indirectly from this invasion. The -main army of Scyths poured down the maritime plain, and there was no -sufficient booty to tempt any but their straggling bands to the barren -hills of Judah.[684] It was the report of this over-flooding from the -North which probably evoked the alarming prophecies of Zephaniah and -Jeremiah, though they found their clearer fulfilment in the invasion of -the Chaldees. - -II. This rush of wild nomads averted for a time the fate of Nineveh. - -The Medes, an Aryan people, had settled south of the Caspian, B.C. -790; and in the same century one of these tribes--the Persians--had -settled south-east of Elam the northern coast of the Persian Gulf. -Cyaxares founded the Median Empire, and attacked Nineveh. The Scythian -invasion forced him to abandon the siege, and the Scythians burnt the -Assyrian palace and plundered the ruins. But Cyaxares succeeded in -intoxicating and murdering the Scythian leaders at a banquet, and -bribed the army to withdraw. Then Cyaxares, with the aid of the -Babylonians under Nabopolassar their rebel viceroy, besieged and took -Nineveh--probably about B.C. 608--while its last king and his captains -were revelling at a banquet.[685] - -The fall of Nineveh was not astonishing. The empire had long been -"slowly bleeding to death" in consequence of its incessant wars. The -city deemed itself impregnable behind walls a hundred feet high, on -which three chariots could drive abreast, and mantled with twelve -hundred towers; but she perished, and all the nations--whom she had -known how to crush, but had with "her stupid and cruel tyranny" never -known how to govern--shouted for joy. That joy finds its triumphant -expression in more than one of the prophets, but specially in the -vivid pan of Nahum. His date is approximately fixed at about B.C. -660, by his reference to the atrocities inflicted by Assurbanipal on -the Egyptian city of No-Amon. "Art thou [Nineveh] better," he asks, -"than No-Amon, that was situate among the canals, that had the water -round about her, whose rampart was the Nile, and her wall was the -waters? Yet she went into captivity! Her young children were dashed to -pieces at the head of all the streets: they cast lots for her -honourable men, and all her great men were bound in chains. Thou also -shalt be drunken: thou shalt faint away, thou shalt seek a stronghold -because of the enemy."[686] - -All the details of her fall are dim; but Nineveh was, in the language -of the prophets, swept with the besom of destruction. Her ruins became -stones of emptiness, and the line of confusion was stretched over her. -Nahum ends with the cry,-- - - "There is no assuaging of thy hurt; thy wound is grievous: - All that hear the bruit of this, clap the hands over thee: - For upon whom hath thy wickedness not passed continually?" - -In truth, Assyria, the ferocious foe of Israel, of Judah, and all the -world, vanished suddenly, like a dream when one awaketh;[687] and those -who passed over its ruins, like Xenophon and his Ten Thousand in B.C. -401, knew not what they were.[688] Her very name had become forgotten in -two centuries. "_Etiam periere ruin!_" The burnt relics and cracked -tablets of her former splendour began to be revealed to the world once -more in 1842, and it is only during the last quarter of a century that -the fragments of her history have been laboriously deciphered. - -III. Such were the events witnessed in their germs or in their -completion by the contemporaries of Josiah and the prophets who -adorned his reign. It was during this period, also, that the power to -whom the ultimate ruin and captivity of Jerusalem was due sprang into -formidable proportions. The ultimate scourge of God to the guilty -people and the guilty city was not to be the Assyrian, nor the -Scythian, nor the Egyptian, nor any of the old Canaanite or Semitic -foes of Israel, nor the Phoenician, nor the Philistine. With all these -she had long contended, and held her own. It was before the Chaldee -that she was doomed to fall, and the Chaldee was a new phenomenon of -which the existence had hardly been recognised as a danger till the -warning prophecy of Isaiah to Hezekiah after the embassy of the rebel -viceroy Merodach-Baladan.[689] - -It is to Habakkuk, in prophecies written very shortly after the death -of Josiah, that we must look for the impression of terror caused by -the Chaldees. - -Nabopolassar,[690] sent by the successor of Assurbanipal to quell a -Chaldan revolt, seized the viceroyalty of Babylon, and joined Cyaxares -in the overthrow of Nineveh. From that time Babylon became greater and -more terrible than Nineveh, whose power it inherited. Habakkuk (ii. -1-19) paints the rapacity, the selfishness, the inflated ambition, the -cruelty, the drunkenness, the idolatry of the Chaldans. He calls them -(i. 5-11) a rough and restless nation, frightful and terrible, whose -horsemen were swifter than leopards, fiercer than evening wolves, flying -to gorge on prey like the vultures, mocking at kings and princes, and -flinging dust over strongholds. Nor has he the least comfort in looking -on their resistless fury, except the deeply significant oracle--an -oracle which contains the secret of their ultimate doom-- - - "Behold, his soul is puffed up; it is not upright in him: - But the righteous man shall live by his fidelity." - -The prophet places absolute reliance on the general principle that -"pride and violence dig their own grave."[691] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[665] Kamphausen (_Die Chronologie der hebrischer Knige_) makes -Josiah succeed to the throne in 638. - -[666] Otherwise his genealogy would not be mentioned for four -generations (Hitzig). - -[667] Zeph. i. 1. Jeremiah also was highly connected. He was a priest -and his father Hilkiah may be the high priest who found the book; "for -his uncle Shallum, father of his cousin Hanameel, was the husband of -Huldah the prophetess" (2 Kings xxii. 14; Jer. xxxii. 7). The fact -that Jeremiah's property was at Anathoth, where lived the descendants -of Ithamar (1 Kings ii. 26), whereas Hilkiah was of the family of -Eleazar (1 Chron. vi. 4-13), does not seem fatal to the view that his -father was the high priest. - -[668] Zeph. ii. 4-7. - -[669] Zeph. ii. 12-15. - -[670] Jer. ii. 1-35. Considering the very great part played by -Jeremiah for nearly half a century of the last history of Judah, the -non-mention of his name in the Book of Kings is a circumstance far -from easy to explain. - -[671] Jer. iv. 6, A. V., "retire, stay not." Comp. Isa. x. 24-31. - -[672] Jer. iv. 7-27. - -[673] Jer. v. 15-17. - -[674] Jer. vi. 1, 22, 23, 24. - -[675] The almond tree (_shqd_) "seems to be awake (_shqd_), -whatsoever trees are still sleeping in the torpor of winter" (Tristram -_Nat. Hist. of the Bible_, 332; Jer. i. 11-14). - -[676] The name Kimmerii (on the Assyrian inscriptions Gimirrai) is -connected with Gomer. The Persians call them Sakai or Scyths. The -nomad Scyths had driven the Kimmerii from the Dniester while -Psammetichus was King of Egypt. For allusions to this see Jer. vi. 22 -_seq._, viii. 16, ix. 10. The first notice of them is in an -inscription of Esarhaddon, B.C. 677, who says that he defeated -"Tiushpa, _the Gimirrai, a roving warrior_, whose own country was -remote." Zephaniah and Jeremiah were certainly thinking of the -Scythians (Eichhorn, Hitzig, Ewald; and more recently Kuenen, -_Onderzoek_, ii. 123; Wellhausen, _Skizzen_, 150). In B.C. 626 they -could not have consciously had the Chaldans in view, though, -twenty-three years later, Jeremiah may have had. - -[677] See Ezek. xxxviii., xxxix. - -[678] Ezek. xxxviii. 2. So Gesenius, Hvernick, etc., and R.V. - -[679] The form in the Vulgate and the Alexandrian MS. of the LXX. is -Mosech; in the Assyrian inscription, Muski. As far back as 1120 -Tiglath-Pileser I. had overrun Tubal (the Tublai, Tabareni) and -Moschi, between the Black Sea and the Taurus. They were neither Aryans -nor Semites. In Gen. x. 2; 1 Chron. i. 5, Gog, Magog, Meshech, and -Gomer are sons of Japheth. They are referred to in Rev. xx. 8. - -[680] Herod., i. 74, 103-106, iv. 1-22, vii. 64; Pliny, _H. N._, v. -16; Jos., _Antt._, I. vi. 1; Syncellus, _Chronogl._, i. 405. - -[681] Sayce, _Ethnology of the Bible; Records of the Past_, ix. 40; -Schrader, _K. A. T._, 159. Some identify Gog with Gyges, King of -Lydia, who was killed in battle _against_ the Scythians, but whose -name stood for a geographical symbol of Asia Minor, sometimes called -Lud. It is said that in 665 Gyges (Gugu) sent two Scythian chiefs as a -present to Nineveh. - -[682] Hence, in 2 Macc. iv. 47, 3 Macc. vii. 5, Scythian is used with -the modern connotation of "Barbarian." - -[683] Ezek. xxxii. 26, 27; Cheyne, _Jeremiah_ ("Men of the Bible") p. -31. - -[684] _Expositor_, 2nd series, iv. 263; Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, 31. Hitzig -and Ewald (erroneously?) refer Psalms lv., lix., to these events, and -it seems also to be an error to suppose that the later name of -Bethshan--Scythopolis--has anything to do with this incursion. Like -the names of Pella, Philadelphia, etc., it is later than the age of -Alexander the Great. See 2 Macc. xii. 30; Jos., _B. J._, II. xviii., -_Vit._ vi. Perhaps Scythopolis is a corruption of Sikytopolis, the -city of Sikkuth; or Scythian may merely stand for "Barbarian," as in 3 -Macc. vii. 5; Col. iii. 11 (Cheyne, _l.c._). - -[685] Nah. i. 10, ii. 5, iii. 12; Diod. Sic., ii. 26. - -[686] Nah. iii. 8-11. - -[687] Strabo, xvi. 1, 3: [Greek: phanisth paoachrma]. - -[688] Xen., _Anab._, III. iv. 7. - -[689] Chaldees, Kardim, Kasdim, Kurds. - -[690] Nabu-pal-ussur, "Nebo protect the son" B.C. 625-7. Jos., _Antt._ -X. xi. 1: comp. _Ap._, i. 19. - -[691] Newman, _Hebrew Monarchy_, p. 315. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXI - - _JOSIAH'S REFORMATION_ - - 2 KINGS xxii. 8-20, xxiii. 1-25 - - "And the works of Josias were upright before his Lord with a heart - full of godliness."--1 ESDRAS i. 23. - - "From Zion shall go forth the Law, and the Word of the Lord from - Jerusalem."--ISA. ii. 3. - - -It is from the Prophets--Zephaniah, Jeremiah, Nahum, Habakkuk, -Ezekiel--that we catch almost our sole glimpses of the vast -world-movements of the nations which must have loomed large on the -minds of the King of Judah and of all earnest politicians in that day. -As they did not directly affect the destiny of Judah till the end of -the reign, they do not interest the historian of the Kings or the -later Chronicler. The things which rendered the reign memorable in -their eyes were chiefly two--the finding of "the Book of the Law" in -the House of the Lord, and the consequent religious reformation. - -It is with the first of these two events that we must deal in the -present chapter. - -Josiah began to reign as a child of eight, and it may be that the -emphatic and honourable mention of his mother--Jedidah ("Beloved"), -daughter of Adaiah of Boscath--may be due to the fact that he owed to -her training that early proclivity to faithfulness which earns for him -the unique testimony, that he not only "walked in the way of David -his father," but that "he turned not aside to the right hand or to the -left." - -At first, of course, as a mere child, he could take no very active -steps. The Chronicler says that at sixteen he began to show his -devotion, and at twenty set himself the task of purging Judah and -Jerusalem from the taint of idols. Things were in a bad condition, as we -see from the bitter complaints and denunciations of Zephaniah and -Jeremiah. Idolatry of the worst description was still openly tolerated. -But Josiah was supported by a band of able and faithful advisers. -Shaphan, grandfather of the unhappy Gedaliah--afterwards the Chaldan -viceroy over conquered Judah--was scribe; Hilkiah, the son of Shallum -and the ancestor of Ezra, was the high priest.[692] By them the king was -assisted, fist in the obliteration of the prevalent emblems of idolatry, -and then in the purification of the Temple. Two centuries and a half had -elapsed since it had been last repaired by Joash, and it must have -needed serious restoration during long years of neglect in the reigns of -Ahaz, of Manasseh, and of Amon. Subscriptions were collected from the -people by "the keepers of the door," and were freely entrusted to the -workmen and their overseers, who employed them faithfully in the objects -for which they were designed.[693] - -The repairs led to an event of momentous influence on all future time. -During the cleansing of the Temple Hilkiah came to Shaphan, and said, "I -have found the Book of the Law in the House of the Lord." Perhaps the -copy of the book had been placed by some priest's hand beside the Ark, -and had been discovered during the removal of the rubbish which neglect -had there accumulated. Shaphan read the book; and when next he had to -see the king to tell him about the progress of the repairs, he said to -him, "Hilkiah the priest hath handed me a book." Josiah bade him read -some of it aloud. It is evident that he read the curses contained in -Deut. xxviii. They horrified the pious monarch; for all that they -contained, and the laws to which they were appended, were wholly new to -him. He might well be amazed that a code so solemn, and purporting to -have emanated from Moses, should, in spite of maledictions so fearful, -have become an absolute dead letter. In deep alarm he sent the priest, -the scribe Shaphan, with his son Ahikam, and Abdon, the son of Micaiah, -and Asahiah, a court official, to inquire of Jehovah, whose great anger -could not but be kindled against king and people by the obliteration and -nullity of His law. They consulted Huldah, the only prophetess mentioned -in the Old Testament, except Miriam and Deborah.[694] She was the wife -of Shallum and keeper of the priests' robes,[695] and she lived in the -suburbs of the city.[696] Her answer was an uncompromising menace. All -the curses which the king had heard against the place and people should -be pitilessly fulfilled,--only, as the king had showed a tender heart, -and had humbled himself before Jehovah, he should go to his own grave in -peace.[697] - -Thereupon the king summoned to the Temple a great assembly of priests, -prophets, and all the people, and, standing by the pillar (or "on the -platform")[698] in the entrance of the inner court, read "all the -words of the Book of the Covenant which had been found in the House of -the Lord" in their ears, and joined with them in "the covenant" to -obey the hitherto unknown or totally forgotten laws which were -inculcated in the newly discovered volume. - -Immediate action followed. The priests were ordered to bring out of the -Temple all the vessels made for Baal, for the Asherah, and for the host -of heaven; they were burnt outside Jerusalem in the Valley of Kedron, -and their ashes taken to Bethel.[699] The _chemarim_ of the high places -were suppressed, as well as all other idolatrous priests who burnt -incense to the signs of the Zodiac, the Hyades, and the heavenly -bodies.[700] The Asherah itself was taken out of the Temple, and it is -truly amazing that we should find it there so late in Josiah's reign. He -burnt it in the Kedron, stamped it to powder, and scattered the powder -"on the graves of the common people." The Chronicler says "on the graves -of them that had sacrificed" to the idols[701];--but this is an -inexplicable statement, since it is (as Professor Lumby says) very -improbable that idolaters had a separate burial-place. It is equally -shocking, and to us incomprehensible, to read that the houses of the -degraded _Qedeshim_ still stood, not "by the Temple" (A.V.), but "_in_ -the Temple,"[702] and that in these houses, or chambers, the women still -"wove embroideries[703] for the Asherah." What was Hilkiah doing? If the -priests of the _high places_ were so guilty from Geba to Beersheba, did -no responsibility attach to the high priest and other priests of the -Temple who permitted the existence of these enormities, not only in the -_bamoth_ at the city gates,[704] but in the very courts of the mountain -of the Lord's House? If the priests of the immemorial shrines were -degraded from their prerogatives, and were not allowed to come up to the -altar of Jehovah in Jerusalem, by what law of justice were they to be -regarded as so immeasurably inferior to the highest members of their own -order, who, for years together, had permitted the worship of a wooden -phallic emblem, and the existence of the worst heathen abominations -within the very Temple of the Lord? Every honest reader must admit that -there are inexplicable difficulties and uncertainties in these ancient -histories, and that our knowledge of the exact circumstances--especially -in all that regards the priests and Levites, who, in the Chronicles, are -their own ecclesiastical historians--must remain extremely imperfect. - -And what can be meant by the clause that the degraded priests of the -old high places, though they were not allowed to serve at the great -altar, yet "did eat of the _unleavened bread_ among their brethren"? -Unleavened bread was only eaten at the Passover; and when there _was_ -a Passover, was eaten by all alike. Perhaps the reading for -"unleavened bread" should be (priestly) "portions"--a reading found by -Geiger in an old manuscript. - -Continuing his work, Josiah defiled Tophet;[705] took away the horses -given by the kings of Judah to the sun, which were stabled beside the -chamber of the eunuch Nathan-Melech in the precincts;[706] and burnt -the sun-chariots in the fire. He removed the altars to the stars on -the roof of the upper chamber of Ahaz,[707] and ground them to powder. -He also destroyed those of his grandfather Manasseh in the two Temple -courts--which we supposed to have been removed by Manasseh in his -repentance--and threw the dust into the Kedron. He defiled the -idolatrous shrines reared by Solomon to the deities of Sidon, Ammon, -and Moloch, broke the pillars, cut down the Asherim, and filled their -places with dead men's bones.[708] Travelling northwards, he burnt, -destroyed, and stamped to powder the altars and the Asherim at Bethel, -and burnt upon the altars the remains found in the sepulchres,[709] -only leaving undisturbed the remains of the old prophet from Judah, -and of the prophet of Samaria.[710] He then destroyed the other -Samaritan shrines, exercising an undisputed authority over the -Northern Kingdom. The mixed inhabitants did not interfere with his -proceedings; and in the declining fortunes of Nineveh, the Assyrian -viceroy--if there was one--did not dispute his authority. Lastly, in -accordance with the fierce injunction of Deut. xvii. 2-5, "he slew all -the priests of the high places" on their own altars, burnt men's bones -upon them, and returned to Jerusalem. - -It is very difficult, with the milder notions which we have learnt -from the spirit of the Gospel, to look with approval on the -recrudescence of the Elijah-spirit displayed by the last proceeding. -But many centuries were to elapse, even under the Gospel Dispensation, -before men learnt the sacred principle of the early Christians that -"violence is hateful to God." Josiah must be judged by a more lenient -judgment, and he was obeying a mandate found in the new Book of the -Law. But the question arises whether the fierce commands of -Deuteronomy were ever intended to be taken _au pied de la lettre_. May -not Deut. xiii. 6-18 have been intended to express in a concrete but -ideal form the spirit of execration to be entertained towards -idolatry? Perhaps in thinking so we are only guilty of an anachronism, -and are applying to the seventh century before Christ the feelings of -the nineteenth century after Christ. - -After this Josiah ordered the people to keep a Deuteronomic Passover, -such as we are told--and as all the circumstances prove--had not been -kept from the days of the Judges. The Chronicler revels in the details -of this Passover, and tells us that Josiah gave the people thirty -thousand lambs and kids, and three thousand bullocks; and his priests -gave two thousand six hundred small cattle, and three hundred oxen; -and the chief of the Levites gave the Levites five thousand small -cattle, and five hundred oxen. He goes on to describe the slaying, -sprinkling of blood, flaying, roasting, boiling in pots, pans, and -caldrons, and attention paid to the burnt-offerings and the fat;[711] -but neither the historians nor the chroniclers, either here or -anywhere else, say one word about the Day of Atonement, or seem aware -of its existence. It belongs to the Post-Exilic Priestly Code, and is -not alluded to in the Book of Deuteronomy. - -Continuing his task, he put away them that had familiar spirits -(_oboth_), and the wizards, and the _teraphim_, with a zeal shown by -no king before or after him; but Jehovah "turned not from the -fierceness of His anger, because of all the provocations which -Manasseh had provoked Him withal." Evil, alas! is more diffusive, and -in some senses more permanent, than good, because of the perverted -bias of human nature. Judah and Jerusalem had been radically -corrupted by the apostate son of Hezekiah, and it may be that the -sudden and high-handed reformation enforced by his grandson depended -too exclusively on the external impulse given to it by the king to -produce deep effects in the hearts of the people. Certain it is that -even Jeremiah--though he was closely connected with the finders of the -book, had perhaps been present when the solemn league and covenant was -taken in the Temple, and lived through the reformation in which he -probably took a considerable part--was profoundly dissatisfied with -the results. It is sad and singular that such should have been the -case; for in the first flush of the new enthusiasm he had written, -"Cursed be the man that heareth not the words of this covenant, which -I commanded your fathers in the day that I brought them forth out of -the land of Egypt, saying, 'Obey My voice.'"[712] Nay, it has been -inferred that he was even an itinerant preacher of the newly found -law; for he writes: "And the Lord said unto me, 'Proclaim all these -words in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem, saying, -Hear ye the words of this covenant, and do them.'"[713] - -The style of Deuteronomy, as is well known, shows remarkable -affinities with the style of Jeremiah. Yet it is clear that after the -death of Josiah the prophet became utterly disillusioned with the -outcome of the whole movement. It proved itself to be at once -evanescent and unreal. The people would not give up their beloved -local shrines.[714] The law, as Habakkuk says (i. 4), became torpid; -judgment went not forth to victory; the wicked compassed about the -righteous, and judgment was perverted. It was easy to obey the -external regulations of Deuteronomy; it was far more difficult to be -true to its noble moral precepts. The reformation of Josiah, so -violent and radical, proved to be only skin-deep; and Jeremiah, with -bitter disappointment, found it to be so. External decency might be -improved, but rites and forms are nothing to Him who searcheth the -heart.[715] There was, in fact, an inherent danger in the place -assumed by the newly discovered book. "Since it was regarded as a -State authority, there early arose a kind of book-science, with its -pedantic pride and erroneous learned endeavours to interpret and apply -the Scriptures. At the same time there arose also a new kind of -hypocrisy and idolatry of the letter, through the new protection which -the State gave to the religion of the book acknowledged by the law. -Thus scholastic wisdom came into conflict with genuine prophecy."[716] - -How entirely the improvement of outward worship failed to improve men's -hearts the prophet testifies.[717] "The sin of Judah," he says, "is -written with a pen of iron, and with the point of a diamond: it is -graven upon the tablets of their hearts, and upon the horns of their -altars, and their Asherim by the green trees[718] upon the high hills. O -My mountain in the field, I will cause thee to serve thine enemies in -the land thou knowest not: for ye have kindled a fire in Mine eyes, -which shall burn for ever." While Josiah lived this apostasy was secret; -but as soon as he died the people "turned again to folly,"[719] and -committed all the old idolatries except the worship of Moloch. There -arose a danger lest even the moderate ritualism of Deuteronomy should be -perverted and exaggerated into mere formality. In the energy of his -indignation against this abuse, Jeremiah has to uplift his voice against -any trust even in the most decided injunctions of this newly discovered -law. He was "a second Amos upon a higher platform." The Deuteronomic Law -did not as yet exhibit the concentrated sacerdotalism and ritualism -which mark the Priestly Code, to which it is far superior in every way. -It is still prophetic in its tone. It places social interests above -rubrics of worship. It expresses the fundamental religious thought "that -Jehovah is in no sense inaccessible; that He can be approached -immediately by all, and without sacerdotal intervention; that He asks -nothing for Himself, but asks it as a religious duty that man should -render unto man what is right; that His Will lies not in any known -height, but in the moral sphere which is known and understood by -all."[720] The book ordained certain sacrifices; yet Jeremiah says with -startling emphasis, "To what purpose cometh there to Me frankincense -from Sheba, and the sweet calamus from a far country? Your -burnt-offerings are not acceptable, nor your sacrifices pleasant unto -Me."[721] Therefore He bids them, "Put your burnt-offerings to your -sacrifices, and eat them as flesh"--_i.e._, "Throw all your offerings -into a mass, and eat them at your pleasure (regardless of sacerdotal -rules): they have neither any inherent sanctity nor any secondary -importance from the characters of the offerers."[722] And in a still -more remarkable passage, "_For I spake not unto your fathers, nor -commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, -concerning burnt-offerings and sacrifices_: but this thing I commanded -them, saying, 'Obey My voice.'"[723] - -Nay, in the most emphatic ordinances of Deuteronomy he found that the -people had created a new peril. They were putting a particularistic -trust in Jehovah, as though He were a respecter of persons, and they His -favourites. They fancied, as in the days of Micah, that it was enough -for them to claim His name, and bribe Him with sacrifices.[724] Above -all, they boasted of and relied upon the possession of His Temple, and -placed their trust on the punctual observance of external ceremonies. -All these sources of vain confidence it was the duty of Jeremiah rudely -to shatter to pieces. Standing at the gates of the Lord's House, he -cried: "Trust ye not in lying words, saying, 'The Temple of the Lord! -the Temple of the Lord! the Temple of the Lord, are these!' Behold, ye -trust in lying words, that cannot profit. Will ye steal, murder, commit -adultery, swear falsely, burn incense unto Baal, and walk after other -gods; and come and stand before Me in this house, whereupon My name is -called, and say, 'We are delivered,' that ye may do all these -abominations? Is this house become a den of robbers in your eyes? But go -ye now to My place which was in Shiloh, where I caused My name to dwell -at the first, and see what I did to it for the wickedness of My people. -I will do unto this house as I have done to Shiloh; and I will cast you -out of My sight, as I have cast out the whole house of -Ephraim."[725]--Yet all hope was not extinguished for ever. The Scythian -might disappear; the Babylonian might come in his place; but one day -there should be a new covenant of pardon and restitution; and as had -been promised in Deuteronomy, "_all_ should know Jehovah, from the least -to the greatest." - -At last he even prophesies the entire future annulment of the solemn -covenant made on the basis of Deuteronomy, and says that Jehovah will -make a new covenant with His people, not according to the covenant -which He made with their fathers.[726] And in his final estimate of -King Josiah after his death, he does not so much as mention his -reformation, his iconoclasm, his sweeping zeal, or his enforcement of -the Deuteronomic Law, but only says to Jehoiakim:-- - -"'Did not thy father eat and drink, and do judgment and justice?--then -it was well with him. He judged the cause of the poor and needy; then -it was well. _Was not this to know Me?' saith the Lord_."[727] - -Whether because its methods were too violent, or because it only -affected the surface of men's lives, or because the people were not -really ripe for it, or because no reformation can ever succeed which -is enforced by autocracy, not spread by persuasion and conviction, it -is certain that the first glamour of Josiah's movement ended in -disillusionment. A religion violently imposed from without as a -state-religion naturally tends to hypocrisy and externalism. What -Jehovah required was, not a changed method of worship, but a changed -heart; and this the reformation of Josiah did not produce. It has -often been so in human history. Failure seems to be written on many of -the most laudable human efforts. Nevertheless, truth ultimately -prevails. Isaiah was murdered, and Urijah, and Jeremiah. Savonarola -was burnt, and Huss, and many a martyr more; but the might of -priestcraft was at last crippled, to be revived, we hope, no more, -either by open violence or secret apostasy. - - "Then to side with Truth is noble, when we share her wretched - crust, - Ere her cause bring fame and profit, and 'tis prosperous to - be just; - Then it is the brave man chooses, while the coward stands - aside, - Doubting in his abject spirit till his Lord is crucified, - And the multitude make virtue of the faith they have denied." - - -FOOTNOTES: - -[692] 2 Kings xxiii. 4. We have here the first mention of "the second -priest" (if, with Grtz, we read _Cohen mishneh_, as in 2 Kings xxv. -18; Jer. lii. 24). In later days he was called "the Sagan." At this -time he probably acted as "Captain of the Temple" (Grtz, ii. 319). - -[693] Comp. 2 Kings xii. 15, where we find the same remark. - -[694] Exod. xv. 20; Judg. iv. 4; Isa. viii. 3. "The prophetess" seems -to mean "prophet's wife." Noadiah was a false prophetess. - -[695] Exod. xxviii. 2, etc. - -[696] 2 Kings xxii. 14. Heb., _mishneh_, lit. "second"; A.V., "the -college"; R.V., "the second quarter." Perhaps it means "the lower -city" (Neh. xi. 9; Zeph. i. 10). It puzzled the LXX.: [Greek: en t -masena]. Vulg., _in secunda_. Jerome says, "_Haud dubium quin urbis -partem significet qu interiori muro vallabatur_." Comp. Zeph. i. 10, -"an howling from the _second_" (_i.e._, quarter of the city); Neh. xi. -9, where, for "_second over the city_" (A. and R.V.), read "over the -second part of the city." - -[697] Another reading is "in Jerusalem," which gets over an historic -difficulty. - -[698] Comp. 2 Kings xi. 14; LXX., [Greek: epi tou stulou]; Heb., -_al-ha-ammud_; Vulg., _super gradum_. - -[699] 2 Kings xxiii. 4; for "in the fields of Kedron" one version has -[Greek: en t empurism tou cheimarrhou], "in the burning-place of the -wady,"--perhaps reading _bemisrephoth_ for _bishedamoth_, and alluding -to lime-kilns in the wady. It is surprising that they should carry the -ashes "to Bethel." Thenius suggests the reading [Hebrew: beit-'al], -"place of execution" (lit., "house of nothingness"). - -[700] Hos. x. 5; Zeph. i. 4 (the only other places where the word -occurs). The _delevit_ of the Vulgate (2 Kings xxiii. 5) only means -that he put them down, and the [Greek: katekause] of the LXX. should -be [Greek: katepause]. - -[701] Comp. Jer. ii. 23, where the LXX. has [Greek: en t polyandri]. -In 2 Chron. xxxiv. 4, perhaps the true reading is, not _Ben-ha-'m_, -but _Ben-hinnom_--which would mean that he scattered the dust in the -gehenna of Jerusalem. Comp. 1 Kings xv. 13. - -[702] For these Galli, see Seneca, _De Vit. Beat._, 27; Pliny, _H. -N._, xi. 49. - -[703] Heb., _bathm_, lit. "tents" or "houses"; Vulg., _quasi -domunculas_. - -[704] In 2 Kings xxiii. 8, Geiger would read "the high places of the -_satyrs_" ([Hebrew: stzrm]). - -[705] Usually derived (as by Selden and Milton) from _toph_, "drum," -but perhaps from _tuph_ (to _spit_ in sign of abhorrence). - -[706] _Parvar_--perhaps "open portico." Renan connects the word with -the Greek [Greek: peribolos]. On horses dedicated to the sun, see Xen. -_Cyrop._, viii. 3, 5, 12; _Anab._, iv. 5. - -[707] See Zeph. i. 5; Jer. xix. 13, xxxii. 29. - -[708] 2 Kings xxiii. 13: "The Mount of Corruption"; Vulg., _Mons -offensionis_; LXX., [Greek: tou orous tou Mosthath]. Some conjecture -that _Maschith_ may be a derisive change for some word which meant -"anointing" (from being the _Oil_ Mountain, _Har ham-mischchah_). - -[709] In burning the bones of the dead, he violated all Jewish -feeling. Amos (ii. 1) had severely rebuked this form of revenge and -insult even in the case of the heathen King of Moab. Bones defiled the -touch (Num. xix. 16; Herod., iv. 73). Josiah's question at Bethel was, -"What _pillar_ is that?" (_tsiyun_). LXX., [Greek: skopelon]. Comp. -Gen. xxxv. 20. - -[710] 1 Kings xiii. 29-31. - -[711] 2 Chron. xxxv. 1-19. - -[712] Jer. xi. 3, 4. Since, in this part of my subject, I make -frequent reference to the prophecies of Jeremiah which are -indispensable to the right understanding of the history, I may here -say that modern critics (Cheyne and others) arrange them as follows:-- - -In the reign of _Josiah_, Jer. ii. 1-iii. 5, iii. 6-vi. 30, vii. 1-ix. -25, xi. 1-17. - -In the reign of _Jehoiakim_, xxvi. 2-6, xlvi. 2-12, xxv., xxxv., and -possibly xvi. 1, xviii. 19-27, xiv., xv., xviii., xi. 18-xii. 17. - -In the reign of _Jehoiachin_, x. 17-23, xiii. - -In the reign of _Zedekiah_, xxii.-xxiv., xxvii.-xxix. 1-11 (?), lii. - -In the _Exile_, xxxix.-xliv. - -[713] See Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, p. 56, _id._ 6. - -[714] Canon Cheyne shows that even Mohammed could not persuade the -Qurashites wholly to give up their black stone at the Kaaba, and their -dolmens and sacred trees (_id._ 103). He left the _auab_, or -sacrificial stones (_matstseboth_), though he warns his followers -against them (_Quran_, v. 92). - -[715] Jer. xvii. 9-11. - -[716] Ewald, _The Prophets_, iii. 63, 64. - -[717] Jer. xvii. 1-4. - -[718] The Qurashites and other heathen Arabs accounted holy a large -green tree, and every year had a sacrifice in its honour. "On the way to -Hunain we called to God's Messenger (Mohammed) that he should appoint -for us such trees. But he was terrified, and said, 'Lord God, Lord God! -Ye speak even as the Israelites ... ye are still in ignorance,--thus are -heathen enslaved'" (Vakdi, _Book of the Campaigns of God's Messenger_, -quoted by Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, p. 103, from Wellhausen). - -[719] Psalm lxxxv. 8. - -[720] Deut. xxx. 11-14. See Wellhausen, p. 165. - -[721] Jer. vi. 20. The passages of Jeremiah which seem of a different -spirit may have been added by later hands--_e.g._, xxxiii. 18, which -is not in the LXX. - -[722] Jer. vii. 21; Ewald; and Cheyne, _l.c._ 120. So the Jews seem to -have understood it, for they appoint this passage to be read on the -_Haphtara_ after the _Parashah_ about sacrifices from Leviticus. - -[723] Jer, vii. 22, 23. This alone would show that Jeremiah did not -(as earlier critics thought) _write_ "Deuteronomy," in spite of the -numerous close resemblances in phraseology. Thus, Jeremiah often -denounces the priests (i. 18, ii. 8-26, iv. 9, v. 31, viii. 1, xiii. -13, xxxii. 32). Cheyne, p. 82. - -[724] Mic. iii. 11. - -[725] Jer. vii. 4, 8-15. - -[726] Jer. xxxi. 31, 32. - -[727] Jer. xxii. 15, 16. - - - - - NOTE TO CHAPTER XXXI. - - "Jehovah is our Lawgiver."--ISA. xxxiii. 22. - - -What was the Book of the Law which Hilkiah found in the Temple? - -The great majority of eminent modern critics have now come to the -conclusion that it was the kernel of the Book of Deuteronomy. Nor is -this in any sense a mere modern notion. It occurs as far back as St. -Jerome (_Adv. Jovin._, i. 5) and St. Chrysostom (_Hom. in Matt._, ix., -p. 135, B. See W. Rob. Smith, p. 258). - -It is no part of my immediate duty to argue this question, but I may -state that the arguments for this conclusion are partly historical, -partly literary, and partly depend on internal evidence. - -I. As regards the _literary_ argument, it is maintained that-- - -1. The full, rounded, rhetorical style of Deuteronomy, so widely -different from the extreme dryness of other parts of the Torah, could -not have been as yet developed in the days of Moses, and required the -slow training of centuries for its perfection. It is a new phenomenon, -and differs widely from earlier prophetic writings, such as those of -Amos and Hosea. - -2. The style and language of the Deuteronomist are so marked, that -they can scarcely escape an intelligent reader of the English Version. -Riehm enumerates sixty-four characteristic words or phrases. Their -significance lies in the fact that they express obvious ideas, and are -not names for special objects, which force a writer to use peculiar -words. The style closely resembles in many phrases and particulars the -style of Jeremiah, and of him alone among the prophets. "Even -supposing that no historic text," it has been said, "taught us that -the articles of Smalkald were the work of Luther, we should still have -the right to affirm that these articles closely resemble the ideas of -Luther, and could hardly have been published without his cognisance." - -II. As regards _historical_ evidence, we observe that-- - -1. No author earlier than Josiah shows any acquaintance with -Deuteronomy: after that date, proofs of such knowledge abound. - -2. The Book of Deuteronomy insisted with reiterated emphasis on the -centralisation of worship. All its ordinances are framed with a view -to promote this end. But we have seen that there is not a trace of -any belief that local shrines were prohibited earlier than the reign -of Hezekiah, who certainly would have defended his boldness by appeal -to a written law if he had known of such as existing. - -III. As regards _internal_ evidence, we see that-- - -1. Many passages and injunctions of the Book of Deuteronomy differ -entirely from those found in the old Book of the Covenant which forms -the most ancient nucleus of Exodus (Exod. xx. 22-xxiii. 33). - -2. Even the most conservative English critics--even those who, with any -pretence to competent knowledge, argue against the more advanced -conclusions of the Higher Criticism--cannot help admitting that at least -three codes, which in many, and in some fundamental, respects differ -widely from each other, and which make no reference to each other, are -found in our present Pentateuch--viz., that of the Book of the Covenant, -that of the Deuteronomist (D.), and that of the Priestly writer (P.). -All three may contain elements as old as the days of Moses; but most -critics (with scarcely an exception in Germany) now believe that the -Deuteronomic Code, in its present form, is not earlier than the date of -Josiah's reformation (_circ._ B.C. 621); and the Priestly Codex -(whatever older documents may exist in it) not older, in its present -form, than about the time of Ezra (B.C. 444). Dillmann, Kittel, and in -his later days Delitzsch, have been of necessity compelled to give up -the views that, in their present form, D. and P. are as ancient as the -days of Moses. The last German critic who held that Moses wrote our -present Pentateuch was Keil (_d._ 1888). Canon Cheyne argues for the -late date of this misnamed "Deuteronomy," on the grounds that the -authors (1) used documents manifestly later than Moses; (2) alluded to -events which only occurred long after Moses; and (3) expressed ideas -which, in the age of Moses, are not psychologically possible. - -The Book of Deuteronomy consists mainly of an historical introduction, -probably added later (i. 1-5); Moses' _first_ discourse (i. 6-iv. 40); -Moses' _second_ discourse (iv. 44-xxvi.); a section marked specially by -blessings and curses (xxvii.-xxix.); a _third_ discourse of Moses (xxix. -2-xxx. 20); his farewell (xxxi. 1-13); his song (xxxi. 14-xxxii. 47); -conclusion, narrating his blessing and death (xxxii. 48-xxxiv. 12). - -I have no space here to enter fully into the arguments which seem -decisive as to the date of the main part of Deuteronomy. Those who -desire to see them must study Colenso, _The Pentateuch_, pt. iii.; -Reuss, _Hist. Sainte et la Loi_, i. 154-211; W. Robertson Smith, _Old -Test. in the Jewish Church_, lect. xvi.; Kuenen, _The Hexateuch_, E. -T., 1886; Kittel, _Gesch. d. Hebrer_, pp. 43-59; Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, -pp. 48-86; S. R. Driver, _s.v._ "Deuteronomy" (Smith's _Dict. of the -Bible_, new ed.); W. Aldis Wright, _The Documents of the Hexateuch_, -pp. lvii.-lxxix. The name "Deuteronomy" (or "second law") arises from -the mistaken rendering of the LXX. and Vulgate in Deut. xvii. 18. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXII - - _THE DEATH OF JOSIAH_ - - B.C. 608 - - 2 KINGS xxiii. 29, 30 - - "Howl, O fir tree; for the cedar is fallen."--ZECH. xi. 2. - - -Josiah survived by thirteen years the reformation and covenant which -are the chief events of his reign. He lived in prosperity and peace. -He did justice and judgment; the poor and needy flourished under his -royal protection; and it was well with him. It seemed as if the -Deuteronomic blessings on faithfulness to its law were about to be -abundantly fulfilled, when "the azure calm of heaven" was suddenly -shattered, and "down came the thunderbolt." The great and victorious -Assurbanipal of Assyria had died, and left his power to weaker -successors. Meanwhile, Egypt was growing in power and splendour under -Pharaoh Necho II. (B.C. 612-596), the sixth king of the twenty-fifth -or Saitic dynasty. He nearly anticipated M. de Lesseps in making the -Suez Canal,[728] and perhaps actually anticipated Vasco de Gama in -rounding the Cabo Tormentoso, or Cape of Good Hope, in a three years' -voyage. He was fired by the ambitious dream of succeeding the -Assyrians as the chief power in the world, or at any rate of seizing -part of the dominions which they had conquered.[729] Accordingly, in -B.C. 608, he went up against the King of Assyria to the river -Euphrates. The Chronicler says that his destination was Carchemish, on -the Euphrates, and some have conjectured that the vague phrase -"against the King of Assyria" is incorrect, and that, as Josephus -states, he was really marching against the Medes and Babylonians after -the fall of Nineveh.[730] - -With this expedition Josiah was not greatly concerned. He may have -begun his reign as the vassal of Assurbanipal; but if so, it is -probable that he had long since ceased to pay tribute to a power which -was tottering to its fall under the attacks of Scythians and -Babylonians. He had availed himself of the disorganisation of the -Assyrian power to re-establish some, at least, of the old authority of -the House of David over the Northern Kingdom, and perhaps he only -undertook the desperate expedient of withstanding the northward march -of the Egyptian host under the notion that either on the march or on -his return the Pharaoh intended to subjugate Palestine to Egypt. - -Pharaoh Necho II., among his other achievements, had created a -powerful fleet,[731] and it is nearly certain that he did not advance -along the coast of Palestine, but made his way by sea to Acco or -Dor.[732] Here he received the news that Josiah meant to block his -path at Megiddo, on the plain of Jezreel. That plain has been the -great and only possible battle-field of Palestine, from the revolt in -which Barak destroyed the host of Jabin,[733] to that in which Tryphon -met Jonathan the Maccabee,[734] and Kleber in 1799 defeated -twenty-five thousand Turks with three thousand French. - -The Chronicler here adds a very remarkable incident.[735] Necho, like -Joash of Israel in former days, did not care to fight with the poor -little King of Judah--or at any rate did not wish to do so at present, -when he was on his way to the greater encounter. He therefore sent an -embassy to Josiah, saying, "What have I to do with thee, King of -Judah? I come not against thee this day, but against the house -wherewith I have war.[736] For God [Elohim] commanded me [in a dream] -to make haste.[737] Forbear, then, from meddling with God, who is with -me, that He destroy thee not." - -The conjecture "in a dream" is not unlikely, nor is it in disaccord -with other events in the annals of the Pharaohs and the Sargonid of -Assyria.[738] We may indeed be surprised that an Egyptian Pharaoh -should profess to deliver to a Jewish king the messages of Elohim, -though we have seen something like this in the case of the -Rabshakeh.[739] The variation in 1 Esdras i. 26-28 is curious and -interesting. We are there told that the message was sent to Josiah, -not only by Pharaoh Necho, who had sent to say "The Lord is with me -hastening me forward: depart from me, and be not against the Lord," -but also by "the prophet Jeremy." Josephus frankly ascribes the error -of Josiah to destiny, as though he had been infatuated by the -dementation which the Greeks attributed to At.[740] - -This, however, is not likely; for it is clear that Jeremiah, though -not mentioned in the Book of Kings, must have had a strong influence -over the mind of Josiah, whom he loved, whose views he shared, in -whose religious revolution he had taken part. Further, we do not read -of any warning recorded by the prophet himself; and had he uttered -one, it would certainly have been mentioned, when he committed his -prophecies to writing twenty-three years after their commencement. A -warning of which the neglect had led to fatal issues would have been -so decisive a confirmation of Jeremiah's prophetic insight that it -could not have been passed over in silence. - -Indeed, Jeremiah may have shared the conviction which, founded on -imperfect generalisation, perhaps dazzled the unfortunate king to his -ruin. Josiah had accepted the Book of Deuteronomy with the whole -strength of his belief, and the Book of Deuteronomy had proclaimed to -Israel as the reward of faithfulness this promise: "And it shall come -to pass that Jehovah, thy God, shall set thee on high above all the -nations of the earth.... Jehovah shall cause thine enemies which rise -up against thee to be smitten before thy face: they shall come out -against thee one way, and flee before thee seven ways."[741] In the -strength of that promise, Josiah was perhaps saying to himself, in -the language of the Psalms, that Jehovah could not fail to save His -anointed, and dash His enemies to pieces under His feet;[742] in the -language, perhaps, of later days, that the sound of a shaken leaf -should chase them, and they should flee when none pursued.[743] - -Alas! such passages do not apply invariably to our worldly fortunes! -God's promises are general. The individual must be considered apart -from the universal in the region of spiritual and eternal blessings. -In the affairs of earth the wicked often seem to be in prosperity, -while the righteous are overwhelmed by all God's waves and storms. -Further, Josiah evidently received a warning--a warning which -professed to come, and really came, from God[744]--whether uttered by -Pharaoh or by Jeremiah. And in this instance Josiah had sought war; he -had not been forced into it. It was not for him to go out of his way -to champion the cause either of cruel Assyria or vaunting Babylon. - -The result was entire disenchantment. No more disheartening and -disastrous calamity could have happened to the kingdom, which had just -begun to struggle out of the slough of idolatry and humiliation. - -Heedless of the message he had received, strong in mistaken hopes, -Josiah opposed his poor, weak forces to the powerful host of renovated -Egypt. The result was instantaneous ruin.[745] Judah was defeated and -scattered without a blow,--Necho came, saw, conquered. Josiah, -according to the present record of the Chronicles, like Ahab, -"disguised himself"[746] and went into the battle; and as he drove -from rank to rank an Egyptian archer drew a bow at a venture, and -smote him while he was putting his forces in array. The arrow-point -brought conviction too late. Josiah saw his error; he knew that his -own death involved the rout of his army. He sounded a retreat, and -said to his servants, "Bear me away to my travelling chariot, for I am -sore wounded."[747] He died at Megiddo, where his ancestor Ahaziah had -died before him from the arrow-wounds of Jehu's pursuers. His servants -carried him in a chariot dead from Megiddo. The famous plain of -Esdraelon had already witnessed two great victories--that of Barak -over Sisera, and that of Gideon over the Midianites; and one -deplorable defeat--that of Saul by the Philistines. It was now -darkened by a catastrophe even more sad.[748] - -When that chariot, accompanied by its wailing escort, entered the -gates of Jerusalem, with the routed army of Judah behind it, the -feeling of the people must have resembled that of the Athenians when -the news reached them that Lysander had destroyed their whole fleet at -gospotami, and the long wail went thrilling up through that sleepless -night from the Peirus all along the Makra Teich to the Parthenon and -the Acropolis. And there followed such a mourning as the land had -never known before. It had begun at Megiddo and Hadadrimmon, leaving -the sad memory of its hopeless intensity. It was renewed at Jerusalem -when they buried the king in his own sepulchre. "The land mourned, -every family apart; the family of the House of David apart, and their -wives apart; the family of the House of Nathan apart, and their wives -apart; the family of the House of Levi apart, and their wives apart; -the family of Shimei apart, and their wives apart; all the families -that remained, every family apart, and their wives apart."[749] "And -all Judah and Jerusalem mourned for Josiah. And Jeremiah lamented for -Josiah: and all the singing men and the singing women spake of Josiah -in their lamentations unto this day, and they were made an institution -in Israel: and, behold, they are written in the Lamentations."[750] -Not even for heroic David, or royal Solomon, or pious Asa, or -prosperous Jehoshaphat had there been so loud a dirge. - -But, alas! there was cause for far deeper sorrow than the loss of a -prince, however able, however beloved. The dead was dead. Natural sorrow -for the bereavement of the people would soon be healed by time, but -behind the passing affliction lay a great fear and a great reaction. - -A great fear,--for now a southern foe was added to the northern. -Jeremiah and other prophets had warned Israel of the peril from the -North. When the Scythian wave "rolled shoreward, struck and was -dissipated," when the source of Assyrian terror seemed to be drying up, -worldlings may have felt inclined to laugh at Jeremiah. But now it was -evident that, sooner or later, the Chaldans would be as formidable as -their predecessors, and out of the serpent's egg was breaking forth a -cockatrice. The uncalled-for attempt of Josiah to bar the path of the -new and mighty Pharaoh had also added Egypt to the list of formidable -enemies. For the present the Pharaoh had passed on to the Euphrates; but -whether he returned victorious or defeated, his troops could not but be -a source of danger to the little kingdom, which would henceforth be -helpless between the overwhelming forces of its foes. - -If such were the fears of the timid and the pessimistic, still deeper -was the disheartenment of the faithful. Josiah had been the most -obedient, the most religious, of all the kings of Judah from childhood -upwards. Where, then, were Jehovah's old loving-kindnesses which He -sware unto David in His truth? Had God forgotten to be gracious? Had -He hidden away His mercy in displeasure? Where were the blessings of -the newly discovered Book of the Law, if the curse fell on its most -earnest votary? Where was Huldah's promise that he should be gathered -to his fathers in peace, if he was carried back dead from the field of -fruitless battle? There can be little doubt that the apparent blight -which had fallen on unavailing righteousness hastened the reaction of -the subsequent reigns. Many might be inclined to cry out with even -Jeremiah in his moments of overwhelming despondency, "Ah, Lord God! -surely Thou hast greatly deceived this people and Jerusalem, saying, -'Ye shall have peace'; whereas the sword reacheth unto the soul."[751] -"O Lord, Thou has deceived me, and I was deceived: Thou art stronger -than I, and hast prevailed: I am a derision daily, every one mocketh -me. Whenever I speak, I must shout, I must cry violence and spoil; for -the word of the Lord is made a reproach unto me, and a derision, -daily."[752] - -But man judges partially and judges amiss. God's ways are not as man's -ways. God sees the whole; He sees the future; He sees things as they -are. Through defeat, through captivity, through multiform affliction, -lay the path to the final deliverance of the nation from the grosser -forms of idolatry. When they wept as they remembered Zion, when they -took down their harps from the willows by the water-courses of Babylon -to sing the Lord's song in a strange land, they turned again--and at -last with their whole heart--to God their Saviour, who had done so -great things for them;--until the grey secret lingering in the East -was brightened by the Morning Star, and there was revealed to the -world a True Israel, and a New Jerusalem, wherein the Lord should be -King for evermore. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[728] He was forced to desist by a fearful mortality among the -labourers. - -[729] _Circ._ B.C. 611-605. Herod., ii. 158, 159, iv. 42. Psamatik, -the father of Necho, was perhaps a Lybian. He established his sway -over all Egypt displacing the Assyrians. - -[730] _Antt._, X. v. 1. - -[731] Herod., ii. 158. His father Psamatik had left him an adequate -army of natives and mercenaries. - -[732] Herodotus says of his ships: [Greek: Hai men epi t bori -thalass epoithsan]. - -[733] Judg. iv. 23; 1 Sam. xxix. 1-11; 1 Kings xx. 26; 2 Kings xxiii. -29; 2 Chron. xxxv. 22; Rev. xvi. 16 (Armageddon). Herodotus confuses -it with Migdol ([Greek: Magdolon]). - -[734] 1 Macc. xii. 49; Jos., _Antt._, XIII. vi. 2. - -[735] 2 Chron. xxxv. 20-22. - -[736] According to 1 Esdras i. 25-32, "for upon Euphrates is my war." - -[737] Klostermann, in 2 Chron. xxxv. 21, reads _bachalm_, "in a -dream," instead of "to make haste." - -[738] Gen. xli. 1; Herod., ii. 188; _Records of the Past_, ix. 52. - -[739] 2 Kings xviii. 25. - -[740] _Antt._, X. v. 1: [Greek: Ts peprmens oimai eis tout' auton -parormsass]. - -[741] Deut. xxviii. 1-8. - -[742] Psalm xx. 6, xviii. 29-50. - -[743] Lev. xxvi. 36. - -[744] 2 Chron. xxxv. 22: "hearkened not _to the words of Necho from -the mouth of God_." - -[745] "When he had _seen_ him." Comp. 2 Kings xiv. 8. - -[746] 1 Esdras i. 25; and LXX., "firmly resolved," "strengthened -himself," as in 2 Chron. xxv. 11. - -[747] Jos., _Antt._, X. v. 1; and 2 Chron. xxxv. 23; 1 Esdras i. 30. - -[748] The fortunes of the Jews again prevailed in this plain in the -days of Holofernes (Judith vii. 3); but they were defeated there by -Placidus (Jos., _B. J._, IV. i. 8). - -[749] Zech. xii. 11-13 (comp. Jer. xxii. 10, 18). No such place as -Hadadrimmon is known, though there is a Rummne not far from Megiddo. -Jerome (_Comm. in Zach._) identifies it with a place which he calls -Maximianopolis. Wellhausen (_Skizzen_, 192) thinks that the mourning -is compared to some wail over the god Hadadrimmon, like the wailing -for Tammuz. Jonathan and Jarchi say that Hadadrimmon was the son of -Tabrimmon, who opposed Ahab at Ramoth-Gilead. - -[750] 2 Chron. xxxv. 24, 25. Jeremiah's elegy has probably perished. -It would have been most interesting had it been preserved. Lam. iv. is -too vague to have been this lost poem. - -[751] Jer. iv. 10. - -[752] Jer. xx. 7, 8. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXIII - - _JEHOAHAZ_ - - B.C. 608 - - 2 KINGS xxiii. 31-33 - - "I went by, and, lo! he was gone: I sought him, but his place - could nowhere be found."--PSALM xxxvii. 36. - -It was under the disastrous circumstances which attended his father's -death at Megiddo that Jehoahaz began to reign. There is some confusion -about the four sons of Josiah, whom the Chronicler calls Johanan, -Jehoiakim, Zedekiah, and Shallum.[753] From Jer. xxii. 11, it appears -that Jehoahaz was the royal name taken on his anointing by Shallum, the -third son.[754] If so, he cannot be identified with Johanan, the -firstborn, as in the margin of our version. Further, it appears from our -historians that Jehoahaz was twenty-three at his succession, and was -therefore younger than Jehoiakim who (three months later) succeeded him -at the age of twenty-five. Jehoahaz was the own brother of Zedekiah, -Jehoiakim being his half-brother by another mother (Zebudah). - -We do not know for what reason he was preferred by "the people of the -land" to his elder brother Eliakim or Jehoiakim. It was probably -because they regarded him as a prince of eminent courage and ability. -The high hopes which the nation conceived of him may be seen in the -pathetic elegy of Ezek. xix.:-- - - "Moreover take thou up a lamentation for the princes of Israel, and - say,-- - What was thy mother? A lioness! - Amidst lions she couched, - In the midst of the young lions she nourished her whelps. - She brought up one of her whelps: he became a young lion; - He learned to catch the prey; he devoured men. - The nations heard of him; - In their pit was he taken,[755] - And they brought him with hooks into the land of Egypt."[756] - -We see, too, that he was to an eminent degree the darling of the -nation in the still more plaintive wail of Jeremiah which will be -quoted later. - -The fact that Shallum solemnly changed his name to Jehoahaz ("Jehovah -taketh hold"),[757] and that the people of the land not only "made him -king in his father's stead," but also "anointed him," points to a -disputed succession.[758] High hopes were conceived of him; but he -hardly had a chance of fulfilling them, for he was only permitted to -reign three months. What were the events of those months we do not -know. Jehoahaz must have disappointed any hopes which may have been -formed of him by the religious party; for dear as he was to them, the -historians record of him that "he did that which was evil in the sight -of the Lord, according to all that his fathers had done," although -they specify no particular offence. The same sad verdict is passed on -all his four successors; but Josephus says even more emphatically of -Jehoahaz that he was impious and impure.[759] - -He must have shown some activity in other respects, or else Ezekiel -would hardly have said that "the nations heard of him," and that "he -learned to catch the prey; he devoured men." Over all his deeds, -whatever they may have been, "the iniquity of oblivion has blindly -scattered her poppy," and he fell a victim to the great -world-movements of those troublous times. - -For Pharaoh, after his defeat of Josiah at Megiddo, proceeded to make -himself master of Syria and Palestine. He took Cadytis, which -Herodotus calls "a large city of Syria,"[760] and which--since it -cannot here mean Gaza, as in Herod., iii. 5--has been identified by -some with Kadesh. Thence he marched to Carchemish, on the right bank -of the Euphrates,[761] none venturing to check him, till "once more, -after the lapse of nine centuries, Egyptian garrisons looked down on -that historic stream."[762] On his return he stopped at Riblah, on -the Orontes,[763] to consolidate his Syrian conquests; and there he -learnt that, without consulting him, the people of Jerusalem had made -Jehoahaz their king. Perhaps he heard enough of the warlike prowess of -Jehoahaz to make him resent this act of independence. After his three -months' campaign he sent for Jehoahaz to Riblah, and the unhappy -prince had no choice but to obey. Possibly the Egyptian party in -Jerusalem, headed by his disappointed elder brother Eliakim, may have -intrigued against him with Pharaoh Necho. When he reached Riblah, he -was unceremoniously deposed; and though we may hope that the -expression of Ezekiel, that "they brought him with _hooks_ into the -land of Egypt," belongs to the metaphor of the captured lion's whelp, -it is certain that he was taken to the banks of the Nile as a fettered -captive, never to return. How long his miserable life was protracted, -or how he was treated in Egypt, we do not know. The sun of the young -prince went down in darkness while it was yet day. No king of Judah -before him had died in prison and in exile, and the calamity smote -heavily the heart of his people. Egypt was not to escape--shortly -thereafter--the doom of violence and pride; but whether the young -Jewish king had died meanwhile of a broken heart, or whether he -dragged on to hoar hairs his maimed life, or whether he was murdered -in his dungeon, no man knew. One thing only was clear to the sad -prophet--that he would never return. - -"Weep ye not for the dead, neither bemoan him: but weep ye sore for -him that is gone away: for he shall return no more, nor see his native -country. For thus saith Jehovah concerning Shallum, the son of Josiah, -King of Judah, which reigned instead of Josiah his father, which went -forth out of this place: 'He shall not return thither any more: but in -the place whither they have led him captive there shall he die, and he -shall see this land no more.'"[764] - -To show his absolute power over Judah and Jerusalem, Pharaoh Necho not -only deposed and fettered their king, but put the whole land under a -yearly tribute of one hundred talents of silver (about 40,000) and a -talent of gold (about 4,000).[765] - -Even this comparatively small sum was a heavy burden for so greatly -afflicted and impoverished a country, and Pharaoh further imposed on -them a vassal to see that it was duly extorted. This was Eliakim, the -eldest living son of Josiah. There was nothing left to plunder in the -Temple or the palace, and therefore the exaction had to be borne by -the taxed and suffering people. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[753] Chron. iii. 15. - -[754] He is named "fourth," but he was older than his brothers -Jehoiakim and Zedekiah (2 Kings xxiii. 31, xxiv. 18). The genealogy is -as follows:-- - - Zebudah = JOSIAH = Hamutal. - | | - ----- |------------------- - | | | - Nehushta = ELIAKIM ZEDEKIAH JEHOAHAZ - | or Jehoiakim. or Mattaniah. or Shallum. - | - JEHOIACHIN. - - -[755] An allusion to the Syrian mode of hunting the lion by driving it -with cries into a concealed pit (Tristram, _Nat. Hist. of the Bible_, -118; Cheyne, 140). - -[756] Ezek. xix. 1-4. - -[757] The name Shallum means "recompense." It may have been regarded -as ill-omened, since the King of Israel who bore this rare name had -only reigned a month. - -[758] The Talmud says that kings were only anointed in special cases -(_Keritoth_, f. 5, 2; Grtz, ii. 328). - -[759] Jos., _Antt._, X. v. 2: [Greek: Asebs kai miaros ton tropon]. - -[760] Herod., ii. 159. - -[761] Mr. G. Smith identifies Carchemish with Jerabls. - -[762] Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, p. 127. - -[763] Comp. 2 Kings xxv. 20, 21. The old Hittite capital of Riblah was -a convenient halting-place on the road between Babylon and Jerusalem. -It was on the northernmost boundary of Palestine towards Damascus -(Amos vi. 14). - -[764] Jer. xxii. 10-12. - -[765] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 3; 1 Esdras i. 36. The smallness of the tribute -proves the impoverishment of the land. Sennacherib demanded from -Hezekiah three hundred talents of silver, and thirty of gold; and -Menahem paid one thousand talents of silver to Tiglath-Pileser. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXIV - - _JEHOIAKIM_ - - B.C. 608-597 - - 2 KINGS xxiii. 36-xxiv. 7 - - "But those things that are recorded of him, and of his uncleanness - and impiety, are written in the Chronicles of the Kings."--1 - ESDRAS i. 42. - - "When Jehoiakim succeeded to the throne, he said, 'My predecessors - knew not how to provoke God.'"--_Sanhedrin_, f. 103, 2. - - "There is no strange handwriting on the wall, - Through all the midnight hum no threatening call, - Nor on the marble floor the stealthy fall - Of fatal footsteps. All is safe.--Thou fool, - The avenging deities are shod with wool!" - W. ALLEN BUTLER. - - -Eliakim succeeded to the throne at the age of twenty-five under very -unenviable circumstances--as a nominal king, a helpless nominee and -tributary of the Pharaoh. He seems to have been thoroughly distasteful -to the people; and if we may judge from the fact that Ezekiel frankly -ignores him and passes from Jehoahaz to Jehoachin, he was regarded as -a tax-gathering usurper nominated by an alien tyrant. For after -speaking of Jehoahaz, Ezekiel says,-- - - "Now when she [Judah] saw that she had waited [for the restoration of - Jehoahaz], and her hope was lost, - Then she took another of her whelps;[766] - A young lion she made him. - He went up and down among the lions; - He became a young lion."[767] - -The historian says that Necho turned the name of Eliakim ("God will -establish") to Jehoiakim ("Jehovah will establish"); but by this can -hardly be meant more than that he sanctioned the change of El into -Jehovah on Eliakim's installation upon the throne. - -Jehoiakim is condemned in the same terms as all the other sons of -Josiah. His misdoings are far more definitely recorded in the -Prophets, who furnish us with details which are passed over by the -historians. Some of his sins may have been due to the influence of his -wife Nehushta, who was a daughter of Elnathan of Achbor, one of the -princes of the heathen party. It was this Elnathan whom the king chose -as a fitting ambassador to demand the extradition of the prophet -Urijah from Egypt. One of the crimes with which Jehoiakim is charged -is the building for himself of a sumptuous palace, and thus vainly -trying to emulate the splendours of Assyrian, Babylonian, and Egyptian -kings. In itself the act would not have been more wicked than it was -in Solomon, whose architectural parade is dwelt upon with enthusiasm. -But the circumstances were now wholly different. Solomon was at that -time in all his glory, the possessor of boundless wealth, the ruler of -an immense and united territory, the head of a powerful and prosperous -people, the successor of an unconquered hero who had gone to his grave -in peace; Jehoiakim, on the other hand, had succeeded a father who -had died in defeat on the field of battle, and a brother who was -hopelessly pining in an Egyptian prison. The Tribes had been carried -into captivity by Assyria; the nation was beaten, oppressed, and poor; -the king himself possessed but a shadow of royalty. In such a -condition of things it would have been his glory to maintain a -watchful and strenuous activity, and to devote himself in simplicity -and self-denial to the good of his people. It showed a perverted and -sensuous mind to insult the misery of his subjects at such a time by -feeble attempts to rival heathen potentates in costly stheticism. But -this was not all; he carried out his ignoble selfishness at the cost -of oppression and wrong.[768] - -It is possible that the prophet Habakkuk alludes to him in the words:-- - -"Woe to him that getteth an evil gain for his house, that he may set -his nest on high, that he may be delivered from the hand of evil![769] -Thou hast consulted shame to thy house by cutting off many peoples, -and hast sinned against thy soul. For the stone shall cry out of the -wall, and the beam out of the timber shall answer it."[770] - -The thought of the Jewish king's selfish expensiveness may have crossed -the mind of Habakkuk, though the taunt is addressed directly to the -Chaldans, and especially to Nebuchadrezzar, who was at that time -revelling in the beautifying of Babylon, and especially of his own -royal palace. On the other hand, the rebuke, or rather the denunciation, -uttered by Jeremiah against the king for this line of conduct, and for -the forced labour which it required, is terribly direct. - - "'Woe unto him that buildeth his house by unrighteousness, - And his chambers by wrong; - That useth his neighbour's service without wages, - And giveth him not his hire; - That saith, "I will build me a wide house and spacious chambers," - And cutteth out windows; - And it is ceiled with cedar, and painted with vermilion. - Shalt thou reign because thou viest with the cedar?[771] - Did not thy father eat and drink, and do judgment and justice? - Then it was well with him! - Was not this to know Me?' saith the Lord. - 'But thine heart is not but for thy dishonest gain, - And for to shed innocent blood, - And for oppression and for violence to do it.'"[772] - -Then follows the stern message of doom which we shall quote hereafter. -The king's bad example stimulated or perhaps emulated similar folly -and want of patriotism on the part of his nobles. They were shepherds -who destroyed and scattered the sheep of Jehovah's pastures. But vain -was their imagined security, and their ostentation. The judgment was -imminent.[773] - -"O inhabitress of Lebanon, that makest thy nest in the cedars," -exclaims the prophet in bitter mockery, "how greatly wilt thou groan -when pangs come upon thee, the pain as of a woman in travail!"[774] - -But Jehoiakim's offences were deadlier than this. The Chronicler -speaks of "the abominations which he did"; and some have therefore -supposed that the evil state of things described by Jeremiah (xix.) -refers to this reign. If so, he plunged into the idolatry which caused -Judah to be shivered like a potter's vessel. Certainly he sinned -grievously against God in the person of His prophets. - -Jeremiah was not the only prophet who disdained the easy and -traitorous popularity which was to be won by prophesying "peace, -peace," when there was no peace. He had for his contemporary another -messenger of God, no less boldly explicit than himself--Urijah, the -son of Shemaiah of Kirjath-Jearim. Jeremiah had as yet only prophesied -in his humble native village of Anathoth; he had not been called upon -to face "the swellings" or "the pride of Jordan."[775] Urijah had been -in the fuller glare of publicity in the capital, and his bold -declaration that Jerusalem should fall before Nebuchadrezzar and the -Chaldans had excited such a fury of indignation that he escaped into -Egypt for his life. Surely this should have appeased the rulers, even -if they chose to pay no attention to the Divine menace. For the -prophets were recognised deliverers of the messages of Jehovah; and -with scarcely an exception, even in the most wicked reigns, their -persons had been regarded as sacrosanct. But Jehoiakim would not let -Urijah escape. He sent an embassy to Necho, headed by his -father-in-law Elnathan, son of Achbor, requesting his extradition. -Urijah had been dragged back from Egypt, and, to the horror of the -people, the king had slain him with the sword, and flung his body into -the graves of the common people.[776] What made this conduct more -monstrous was the precedent of Micah the Morasthite. He, in the days -of Hezekiah, had prophesied,-- - - "Zion shall be ploughed as a field, - And Jerusalem shall become heaps, - And the Mountain of the House as the wooded heights."[777] - -Yet so far from putting him to death, or even stirring a finger -against him, the pious king had only been moved to repentance by the -Divine threatenings. Thus the blood of the first martyr-prophet, if we -except the case of Zechariah, had been shed by the son of Judah's most -pious king. Jeremiah himself only narrowly escaped martyrdom. The -precedent of Micah helped to save him, though it had not saved Urijah. -He was far more powerfully protected by the patronage of the princes -and the people. Standing in the Temple court, he had declared that, -unless the nation repented, that house should be like Shiloh, and the -city a curse to all the nations of the earth. Maddened by such words -of bold rebuke, the priests and the prophets and the people had -threatened him with death. But the princes took his part, and some of -the people came over to them. His most powerful protector was Ahikam, -the son of Shaphan, a member of a family of the utmost distinction. - -Meanwhile, we must follow for a time the outward fortunes of the king -and of the world. - -Necho, after his successful advance, had retired to Egypt, and -Jehoiakim continued to be for three years his obsequious servant. An -event of tremendous importance for the world changed the entire -fortunes of Egypt and of Judah. Nineveh fell with a crash which -terrified the nations. We might apply to her the language which Isaiah -applies to her successor, Babylon:-- - -"Sheol from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming: it -stirreth up the shades for thee, even the Rephaim of the earth; it -hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations. All -they shall answer and say unto thee, 'Art thou also become weak as we? -art thou become like unto us?' ... All the kings of the nations, all -of them, sleep in glory, every one in his own house. But thou art cast -forth away from thy sepulchre like an abominable branch, as the -raiment of those that are slain, that are thrust through with the -sword, that go down to the stones of the pit.... They that see thee -shall narrowly look upon thee ... and say, 'Is this the man that made -the earth to tremble? that did shake kingdoms? that made the world as -a wilderness, and overthrew the cities thereof? that let not loose his -prisoners to their home?'"[778] - -Yes, Assyria had fallen like some mighty cedar in Libanus, and the -nations gazed without pity and with exultation on his torn and -scattered branches. - -And coincident with the fate of Nineveh had been the rise of the -Chaldan power. - -Nabupalussur[779] had been a general of one of the last Assyrian kings, -and had been sent by him with an army to quell a Babylonian revolt. -Instead of this, he seized the city and made himself king. When the -final overthrow and obliteration of Nineveh had secured his power, he -sent his brave and brilliant son Nebuchadrezzar[780] (B.C. 605) to -secure the provinces which he had wrested from Assyria, and especially -to regain possession of Carchemish, which commanded the river. - -Necho marched to protect his conquests, and at Carchemish the hostile -forces encountered each other in a tremendous battle,--immemorial -Egypt under the representative of its age-long Pharaohs; Babylon, with -her independence of yesterday, under a prince hitherto unknown, whose -name was to become one of the most famous in the world. The result is -described by Jeremiah (xlvi. 1-12). Egypt was hopelessly defeated. Her -splendidly arrayed warriors were panic-stricken and routed; her chief -heroes were dashed to pieces by the heavy maces of the Babylonians, or -fled without so much as looking back. The scene was one of -"Magor-missabib"--terror on every side.[781] Pharaoh's host came up -like the Nile in flood with its Ethiopian hoplites and Asiatic -archers; but they were driven back. The daughter of Egypt received a -wound which no balm of Gilead could cure. The nations heard of her -shame, and the prophet pronounced her further chastisement by the -hands of Nebuchadrezzar. - -Then, in the fourth year of Jehoiakim, the young Babylonian conqueror -swept down upon Syria and Palestine like a bounding leopard, like an -avenging eagle (Hab. i. 7, 8). Jehoiakim had no choice but to change -his vassalhood to Necho for a vassalage to Nebuchadrezzar.[782] He -might have suffered severe consequences, but tidings came to the young -Chaldan that his father had ended his reign of twenty-one years and -was dead. For fear lest disturbances might arise in his capital, he at -once dashed home across the desert with some light troops by way of -Tadmor, while he told his general to follow him home through Syria by -the longer route. He seems, however, to have carried away with him -some captives, among whom were Daniel, Ananias, Azarias, and -Misael,[783] destined hereafter for such memorable fortunes. Jehoiakim -himself was thrown into fetters to be carried into Babylon; but the -conqueror changed his mind, and probably thought that it would be -safer for the present to accept his pledges and assurances, and leave -him as his viceroy. "He took an oath of him," says Ezekiel (xvii. 13); -"he took also the mighty of the land."[784] - -For three years this frivolous egotist who occupied the throne of -Judah remained faithful to his covenant with the King of Babylon, but -at the end of that time he rebelled. In this rebellion he was again -deluded by the glamour of Egypt, and reliance on the empty promise of -"horses and much people." Ezekiel openly disapproved of this -policy,[785] and reproached the king for his faithlessness to his -oath. Jeremiah went further, and declared in the plainest language -that "Nebuchadrezzar would certainly come up and destroy this land, -and cause to cease from thence both man and beast."[786] - -Nearer and nearer the danger came. At first the King of Babylon was too -busy to do more than send against the Jewish rebel marauding bands of -Chaldans, who acted in concert with the hereditary depredators of -Judah--Syrians, Moabites, and Ammonites. But the prophet knew that the -danger would not end there, believing that God would yet "remove Judah -out of His sight" for the unforgiven sins of Manasseh and the innocent -blood with which he had filled Jerusalem.[787] At last Nebuchadrezzar -had time to turn closer attention to the affairs of Judah, and this -became necessary because of the revolt of Tyre under its King Ithobalus. -In the stress of the peril Jehoiakim proclaimed a fast and a day of -humiliation in the Temple. Jeremiah was at this time "shut up"--either -in hiding, or in some sort of custody. As he could not go and preach in -person, he dictated his prophecy to Baruch, who wrote it on a scroll, -and went in the prophet's place to read it in the Lord's House to the -people there assembled from Jerusalem and all Judah in the chamber of -Gemariah, the son of Shaphan, in the inner court, by the new gate.[788] -Gemariah was the brother of Ahikam, the protector of the prophet. - -No one was more painfully alarmed by Jeremiah's prophecy than Micaiah, -the son of Gemariah, and he thought it his duty to go and tell his -father and the other princes what he had heard. They were assembled in -the scribe's chamber, and sent a courtier of Ethiopian race--Jehudi, -the son of Cushi--bidding him to bring the scroll with him, and to -come to them.[789] - -Baruch was a person of distinction. He was the brother of Seraiah, who -is called in our A.V. "a quiet prince," and in the margin "prince of -Menucha" or "chief chamberlain," literally "master of the -resting-place"; and he was the grandson of Maaseiah, "the governor" of -the city.[790] The office imposed on him by Jeremiah was so perilous -and painful that it nearly broke his heart. He exclaimed to Jeremiah, -"Woe is me now! the Lord hath added grief to my sorrow. I am weary -with my sighing, and I find no rest." The answer which the prophet was -commissioned to give him was very remarkable. It confirmed the -terrible doom on his native land, but added, "'And seekest thou great -things for thyself? Seek them not. For, behold, I will bring evil upon -all flesh,' saith the Lord: 'but thy life will I give unto thee for a -prey in all places whither thou goest.'"[791] - -Baruch obeyed the summons of the princes, and at their request sat -down with them and read the scroll in their ears. When they had heard -the portentous prophecy, they turned shuddering to one another, and -said, "We must tell the king of all these words." They asked Baruch -how he had written them, and he said he had taken them down at the -prophet's dictation. Then, knowing the storm which would burst over -the bold offenders, they said, "Go, hide thee, thou and Jeremiah, and -let no man know where ye be." - -Not daring to imperil the awful document, they laid it up in the -chamber of Elishama, the scribe, but went to the king and told him its -contents. He sent Jehudi to fetch it, and to read it in their hearing. -Jehoiakim and the illustrious company were seated in the -winter-chamber; for it was October, and a fire was burning in the -brazier, where Jehoiakim sat warming himself in the chilly weather. - -As he listened, he was filled not only with fury, but with contempt. -Such a message might well have caused him and his worst counsellors to -rend their clothes; but instead of this they adopted a tone of defiance. -By the time that Jehudi had read three or four columns, Jehoiakim -snatched the scribe's knife which hung at his girdle, and began to cut -up the scroll, with the intention of burning it. Seeing his purpose, -Gemariah, Elnathan, and Seraiah entreated him not to destroy it. But he -would not listen. He flung the fragments into the brazier, and they were -consumed. He ordered his son Jerahmeel,[792] with Seraiah and Shelemiah, -to seize both Baruch and Jeremiah, and bring them before him for -punishment. Doubtless they would have suffered the fate of Urijah, but -"the Lord hid them." There were enough persons of power on their side to -render their hiding-place secure. - -But the king's impious indifference, so far from making any difference -in the things that were, only brought down upon his guilt a fearful -doom. Truth cannot be cut to pieces, or burnt, or mechanically -suppressed. - - "Truth, crushed to earth, shall rise again; - The eternal years of God are hers: - But error, vanquished, writhes in pain, - And dies amid her worshippers." - -All the former denunciations, and new ones added to them, were -rewritten by Jeremiah and his faithful friend in their hiding-place, -and among them these words[793]:-- - -"Thus saith the Lord of Jehoiakim, King of Judah, 'He shall have none -to sit upon the throne of David; and his dead body shall be cast out -in the day to the heat, and in the night to the frost.'" - -A frightful drought added to the misery of this reign, but failed to -bring the wretched king to his senses. Jeremiah describes it[794]:-- - -"Judah mourneth, and the gates thereof languish; they bow down -mourning unto the ground; and the cry of Jerusalem is gone up. And the -nobles send their menials to the waters: they come to the pits, and -find no water; they return with their vessels empty; they are ashamed -and confounded, and cover their heads, because of the ground which is -chapped, for that no rain hath been in the land.... Yea, the hind also -in the field calveth, and forsaketh her young, because there is no -grass. And the wild asses stand on the bare heights, they pant for -air like jackals; their eyes fail, because there is no herbage." - -Even this affliction, so vividly and pathetically described, failed to -waken any repentance. And then the doom fell. Nebuchadrezzar advanced -in person against Jerusalem.[795] Even the hardy nomad Rechabites had -to fly before the Chaldans, and to take refuge in the cities which -they hated. The sacred historian tells us nothing as to the manner of -the death of Jehoiakim, only saying that he "slept with his fathers": -his narrative of this period is exceedingly meagre. Josephus says that -Nebuchadrezzar slew him and the flower of the citizens, and sent three -thousand captives to Babylon.[796] Some imagine that he was killed by -the Babylonians in a raid outside the walls of Jerusalem, or "murdered -by his own people, and his body thrown for a time outside the walls." -If so, the Babylonians did not war with the dead. His remains, after -this "burial of an ass,"[797] may have been finally suffered to rest -in a tomb. The Septuagint says (2 Chron. xxxvi. 8) that he was buried -"in Ganosan," by which may be meant the sepulchre of Manasseh in the -garden of Uzza.[798] Not for him was the wailing cry "_Ho, adon! -Ho, hodo!_" ("Ah, Lord! Ah, his glory!"). - -"The memory of the wicked shall rot." Certainly this was the case with -Jehoiakim. The Chronicler mysteriously alludes to "his abominations -which he did, _and that which was found in him_."[799] The Rabbis, -interpreting this after their manner, say that "the thing found" was -the name of the demon Codonazor, to whom he had sold himself, which -after his death was discovered legibly written in Hebrew letters on -his skin. "Rabbi Johanan and Rabbi Eleazar debated what was meant by -'that which was found on him.' One said that he tattooed the name of -an idol upon his body ([Hebrew: mtv]), and the other said that he had -tattooed the name of the god Recreon."[800] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[766] Not Jehoiakim, but Jehoiachin, as the sequel shows. - -[767] Ezek. xix. 5-9. The allusions to Jehoiakim by Jeremiah are -numerous, and all unfavourable (xxii. 13-19, xxvi. 20-23, xxxvi. -20-31, etc.) - -[768] Josephus (_Antt._, X. v. 2) is very severe on this king. He says -that "he was unjust in disposition, an evil-doer, neither pious -towards God nor just towards men." - -[769] Perhaps an allusion to a sort of fortified palace on Ophel. - -[770] Hab. ii. 9-11. - -[771] The text is perhaps corrupt. Two MSS. of the LXX. read "because -thou viest _with Ahab_," and the Vatican MSS. has "_with Ahaz_." -Cheyne adopts the former reading. - -[772] Jer. xxii. 13-17. - -[773] Jer. xxiii. 1. - -[774] Jer. xxii. 23. - -[775] Jer. xii. 5. - -[776] Jer. xxvi. 20-23. So far as I am aware, Bunsen stands alone in -identifying Urijah with the "Zechariah" who wrote Zech. xii.-xiv. -Others refer Zech. xii. 10 to the murder of Urijah. - -[777] Jer. xxvi. 18. - -[778] Isa. xiv., _passim_. - -[779] Nabu-pal-ussur, "Nebo protect the son." - -[780] Nabu-kudur-ussur, "Nebo protect the crown" (Schrader, ii. 48), or -"the youth" (Oppert). The portrait of Nebuchadrezzar--this is the proper -spelling, as generally in Jeremiah--is preserved for us on a black cameo -which he presented to the god Merodach. It is now in the Berlin Museum, -and shows strong but not cruel or ignoble characteristics. It is copied -in Riehm's _Handwrterbuch_, ii. 1067. The Jews, as they were fond of -doing to their enemies, made insulting puns on his name. Thus in the -_Vayyikra Rabba_ (Wnsche, _Bibl. Rabb._) the Three Children are -represented as saying to him, "You are Neboo-cad-netser: bark [_nabach_] -like a dog; swell like a water-jar [_kad_], and chirp like a cricket -[_tsertser_],"--in allusion to his madness. - -[781] Jer. xlvi. 5 (vi. 25). - -[782] Jos., _Antt._, X. xi.; Berosus, p. 11. The Chronicler and -Josephus show some confusion, caused by the similarity of the names -Jehoiakim and Jehoiachin. - -[783] Dan. i. 6. - -[784] We might infer from Ezek. xvii. 12 that Nebuchadrezzar actually -took Jehoiakim with him to Babylon. - -[785] Ezek. xvii. 15. - -[786] Jer. xxxvi. 29, xxv. 9, xxvi. 6. - -[787] 2 Kings xxiv. 2-4. - -[788] Grtz thinks that Jeremiah's roll was substantially Jer. xxv. - -[789] Jos., _Antt._, IX. ix. 1. - -[790] Jer. li. 59. Ewald, Hitzig, and others take the title to mean -"quartermaster" (2 Chron. xxxiv. 8). - -[791] Jer. xlv. 1-5. - -[792] Zeph. i. 8; 1 Kings xxii. 26; Jer. xxxvi. 26, A.V., "The son of -Hammelech." Comp. xxxviii. 6. _Hammelech_ may be a proper name, or a -prince of the blood-royal may be intended. - -[793] "The 'Book,' now as afterwards, was to be the death-blow of the -old regal, aristocratic, sacerdotal exclusiveness. The 'Scribe,' now -first rising into importance in the person of Baruch to supply the -defects of the living Prophet, was, as the printing-press in later -ages, handing on the words of truth, which else might have -irretrievably perished" (Stanley). - -[794] Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, p. 149; Jer. xiv. 1-xv. 9. - -[795] Nebuchadrezzar occupies a larger space in the Bible than any -heathen king, being spoken of in 2 Kings, 2 Chronicles, Ezra, -Nehemiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel. - -[796] For further details of Jehoiakim see 1 Esdras i. 38: "He bound -Joakim and the nobles; _but Zaraces_ his brother he apprehended, and -brought him out of Egypt." The allusion is entirely obscure, and -probably arises from some corruption of the text. The literal -rendering is: "And _Joakim_ bound the nobles; but Zaraces his brother -he apprehended, and brought him out of Egypt." Zaraces might be a -corruption for Zedekiah, who was Jehoiakim's half-brother. Some think -that Zaraces is a corruption for Urijah, and "his brother" a clerical -error. - -[797] Jer. xxxvi. 30, xxii. 19. - -[798] LXX., [Greek: kai ekoimth Iakeim en Ganozan meta tn patern -heautou]. - -[799] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 8. - -[800] _Sanhedrin_, f. 104, 2. For another allusion see _id._ 49, 1; -Hershon, _Treasures of the Talmud_, p. 232. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXV - - _JEHOIACHIN_ - - B.C. 597 - - 2 KINGS xxiv. 8-16 - - "There are times when ancient truths become modern falsehoods, - when the signs of God's dispensations are made so clear by the - course of natural events as to supersede the revelations of even - their most sacred past."--STANLEY, _Lectures_, ii. 521. - - -Jehoiachin--"Jehovah maketh steadfast"--who is also called Jeconiah, -and--perhaps with intentional slight--Coniah, succeeded, at the age of -eighteen, to the miserable and distracted heritage of the throne of -Judah. The "eight years old" of the Chronicler must be a clerical -error, for he had a harem. He only reigned for three months; and the -historian pronounces over him, as over all the four kings of the House -of Josiah, the stereotyped condemnation of evil-doing. Was there -anything in the manner in which Josiah had trained his family which -could account for their unsatisfactoriness? In Jehoiachin's case we do -not know what his transgressions were, but perhaps his mother's -influence rendered him as little favourable to the prophetic party as -his brother Jehoiakim had been. For the _Gebrah_ was Nehushta, the -daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem. Her name means apparently "Brass," -and nothing can be deduced from it; but her father Elnathan was (as -we have seen) the envoy who, by order of Jehoiakim, had dragged back -from Egypt the martyr-prophet Urijah.[801] - -Brief as was his reign of three months and ten days[802]--a hundred -days, like that of his unhappy uncle Jehoahaz--he is largely alluded -to by the contemporary prophets. - -Indignant at the sins and apostasies of Judah, and convinced that her -retribution was nigh at hand, Jeremiah took with him an earthen pot to -the Valley of Hinnom, and there shivered it to pieces at Tophet in the -presence of certain elders of the people and of the priests, -explaining that his symbolic action indicated the destruction of -Jerusalem. On hearing the tenor of these prophecies, the priest -Pashur, who was officer of the Temple, smote Jeremiah in the face, and -put him in the stocks in a prominent place by the Temple gate.[803] -Jeremiah in return prophesied that Pashur and all his family should be -carried into captivity, so that his name should be changed from Pashur -to Magor-Missabib, "Terror on every side." - -Against the king himself he pronounced the doom: "'As I live,' saith the -Lord, 'though Coniah, the son of Jehoiakim, King of Judah, were the -signet on My right hand, yet will I pluck thee thence; and I will give -thee into the hands of them that seek thy life, ... even into the hand -of Nebuchadrezzar.... And I will hurl thee, and thy mother that bare -thee, into another country;[804] ... and there shall ye die.' ... Is -this man Coniah a despised broken piece of work? is he a vessel wherein -is no pleasure? wherefore are they hurled, he and his seed, and cast -into a land which they know not? O land, land, land! hear the word of -the Lord. Thus saith the Lord, 'Write ye this man childless, a man that -shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, -sitting upon the throne of David, or ruling any more in Judah.'" - -Yet there must have been something in Jeconiah which impressed -favourably the minds of men. Brief as was his reign, his memory was -never forgotten. We learn from the _Mishna_ that one of the gates of -Jerusalem--probably that by which he left the city--for ever bore his -name.[805] Josephus says that his captivity was annually commemorated. -Jeremiah writes in the Lamentations:-- - -"Our pursuers are swifter than the eagles of heaven: they have pursued -us upon the mountains, they have laid wait for us in the wilderness. -The breath of our nostrils, the anointed of the Lord, was taken in -their pits, of whom we said, 'Under his shadow we shall live among the -heathen.'" - -Ezekiel compares him to a young lion:-- - -"He went up and down among the lions, he became a young lion, and -learned to catch the prey. And he knew their palaces, and laid waste -their cities; and the land was desolate, and the fulness thereof, by -the noise of his roaring. Then the nations set against him on every -side from the provinces, and spread their net over him: he was taken -in their pit. And they put him in ward in hooks, and brought him to -the King of Babylon: they brought him into holds, that his voice -should no more be heard upon the mountains of Israel."[806] - -A prince of whom a contemporary prophet could thus write was obviously -no _fainant_. Indeed, the energetic measures which Nebuchadrezzar -adopted against him may have been due to the fact that he had -endeavoured to rouse his discouraged people. But what could he do -against such a power as that of the Chaldans? Nebuchadrezzar sent his -generals against Jerusalem; and when it was ripe for capture, advanced -in person to take possession of it. Resistance had become hopeless; -there lay no chance in anything but that complete submission which -might possibly avert the worst effects of the destruction of the city. -Accordingly, Jeconiah, accompanied by his mother, his court, his -princes, and his officers, went out in procession, and threw -themselves on the mercy of the King of Babylon. Nebuchadrezzar was far -less brutal than the Sargons and Assurbanipals of Assyria; but Judah -had twice revolted, and the defection of Tyre showed him that the -affairs of Palestine could no longer be neglected. He thoroughly -despoiled the Temple and the palace, and carried the spoils to -Babylon, as Isaiah had forewarned Hezekiah should be the case.[807] -That he might further weaken and humiliate the city, he stripped it -of its king, its royal house, its court, its nobles, its soldiers, -even its craftsmen and smiths, and carried ten thousand eight hundred -and thirty-two captives to Babylon (Jos., _Antt._, X. vii. 1), among -whom was the prophet Ezekiel. He naturally spared Jeremiah, who -regarded him as "the sword of Jehovah" (Jer. xlvii. 6), and as -"Jehovah's servant, to do His pleasure" (Jer. xxv. 9, xxvii. 6, xliii. -10). On the whole, Nebuchadrezzar is not treated with abhorrence by -the Jews. There was something in his character which inspired respect; -and the Jews deal with him leniently, both in their records and -generally in their traditions. "Nebuchadnezzar," we read in the Talmud -(_Taanith_ f. 18, 2), "was a worthy king, and deserved that a miracle -should be performed through him." - -From the allusion of Ezekiel we might infer that Jehoiachin was -violent and self-willed; but Josephus speaks of his kindness and -gentleness.[808] Was he, as Jeremiah had prophesied, literally -"childless"?[809] It is true that in 1 Chron. iii. 17, 18, eight sons -are ascribed to him, and among them Shealtiel, in whom the royal line -was continued. But it is far from certain that these sons were not the -sons of his brother Neri, of the House of Nathan,[810] and it seems -that they were only adopted by the unhappy captive. The Book of Baruch -describes him weeping by the Euphrates.[811] But if we may trust the -story of Susannah, his outward fortunes were peaceful, and he was -allowed to live in his own house and gardens in peace, and in a -certain degree of splendour.[812] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[801] Jer. xxvi. 22. - -[802] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 9. - -[803] Jer. xx. 2. There seem to have been special "stocks" and "collars" -in the Temple, reserved, by order of the priest Jehoiada, for those whom -the priests regarded as unruly prophets (Jer. xxix. 26). - -[804] Jer. xxii. 24-30. The captivity of the queen-mother struck men's -imaginations (Jer. xxix. 2). - -[805] _Middoth_, ii. 6, quoted by Cheyne, p. 163; Jos., _B. J._, VI. -ii. 1. Comp. Ezek. i. 2. - -[806] Ezek. xix. 6-9. The special allusions are no longer certain. - -[807] 2 Kings xx. 17. The expression "_he cut to pieces_ all the -vessels of gold which Solomon had made" is hardly consistent with Ezra -i. 7-11, unless we understand the word in a loose sense. - -[808] He says that he nobly gave himself up to save the city (_Antt._, -X. vii. 1). His captivity was made an era from which to date Ezek. i. -2, viii. 1, xxiv. 1, xxvi. 1, etc. Comp. Susannah 1-4. - -[809] Jer. xxii. 30, '_arr_. His "son" Assir (1 Chron. iii. 17) may -have been made an eunuch (Isa. xxxix. 7). - -[810] Luke iii. 27, 31; Matt. i. 12. - -[811] Baruch i. 3, 4. - -[812] The favourable notice of Nebuchadrezzar in _Taanith_ (quoted -above) is not found in _Berachoth_, f. 57, 2, where he is called "the -wicked." There are many wild legends about him. In _Nedarim_ (f. 65, -2), R. Yitzchak says: "May melted gold be poured into the mouth of the -wicked Nebuchadrezzar! Had not an angel struck him on the mouth, he -would have outshone all David's songs and praises." With reference to -Isa. xxii. 1, 2, the Rabbis say that Jeconiah went to the Temple roof, -and flung up the keys into the air, when Nebuchadrezzar required them: -"a hand took them, and they were seen no more" (_Shekalim_, vi. 5). In -_Nedarim_ (f. 65, 2) we are told that Zedekiah's rebellion consisted -in divulging, contrary to his oath, that he had seen Nebuchadrezzar -eating a live hare (Hershon, _Treasures of the Talmud_). - - - - - CHAPTER XXXVI - - _ZEDEKIAH, THE LAST KING OF JUDAH_ - - B.C. 597-586 - - 2 KINGS xxiv. 18-xxv. 7 - - "Quand ce grand Dieu a choisi quelqu'un pour tre l'instrument de - ses desseins rien n'arrte le cours, o il enchaine, o il - aveugle, o il dompte tout ce qui est capable de rsistance." - BOSSUET, _Oraison funbre de Henriette Marie_. - - -When Jehoiachin was carried captive to Babylon, never to return, his -uncle Mattaniah ("Jehovah's gift"), the third son of Josiah, was put -by Nebuchadrezzar in his place. In solemn ratification of the new -king's authority, the Babylonian conqueror sanctioned the change of -his name to Zedekiah ("Jehovah's righteousness").[813] He was -twenty-one at his accession, and he reigned eleven years. - -"Behold," writes Ezekiel, "the King of Babylon came to Jerusalem, and -took the king thereof, and the princes thereof, and brought them to -him to Babylon; and he took of the seed royal" (_i.e._, Zedekiah), -"_and made a covenant with him; he also brought him under an oath: and -took away the mighty of the land, that the kingdom might be base, that -it might not lift itself up, but that by keeping of his covenant it -might stand_."[814] - -Perhaps by this covenant Zechariah meant to emphasise the meaning of -his name, and to show that he would reign in righteousness. - -The prophet at the beginning of the chapter describes Nebuchadrezzar -and Jehoiachin in "a riddle." - -"A great eagle," he says, "with great wings and long pinions, full of -feathers, which had divers colours, came unto Lebanon, and took the -top of the cedar" (Jehoiachin): "he cropped off the topmost of the -young twigs thereof, and carried it into a land of traffic; he set it -in a city of merchants. He took also of the seed of the land" -(Zedekiah), "and planted it in a fruitful soil; he placed it beside -great waters, he set it as a willow tree. And it grew, and became a -spreading vine of low stature, whose branches turned towards him, and -the roots thereof were under him: so it became a vine, and brought -forth branches, and shot forth sprigs."[815] - -The words refer to the first three years of Zedekiah's reign, and they -imply, consistently with the views of the prophets, that, if the weak -king had been content with the lowly eminence to which God had called -him, and if he had kept his oath and covenant with Babylon, all might -yet have been well with him and his land. At first it seemed likely to -be so; for Zedekiah wished to be faithful to Jehovah. He made a -covenant with all the people to set free their Hebrew slaves. Alas! it -was very shortlived. Self-sacrifice cost something, and the princes -soon took back the discarded bondservants.[816] What made this conduct -the more shocking was that their covenant to obey the law had been -made in the most solemn manner by "cutting a calf in twain, and -passing between the severed halves."[817] But the weak king was -perfectly powerless in the hands of his tyrannous aristocracy.[818] - -The exiles in Babylon were now the best and most important section of -the nation. Jeremiah compares them to good figs; while the remnant at -Jerusalem were bad and withered. He and Ezekiel raised their voices, -as in strophe and antistrophe, for the teaching alike of the exiles -and of the remnant left at Jerusalem, for whom the exiles were bidden -to entreat God in prayer. Zedekiah himself made at least one journey -northward, either voluntarily or under summons, to renew his oath and -reassure Nebuchadrezzar of his fidelity.[819] He was accompanied by -Seraiah, the brother of Baruch, who was privately entrusted by -Jeremiah with a prophecy of the fall of Babylon, which he was to fling -into the midst of the Euphrates.[820] - -The last King of Judah seems to have been weak rather than wicked. He -was a reed shaken by the wind. He yielded to the influence of the last -person who argued with him; and he seems to have dreaded above all -things the personal ridicule, danger, and opposition which it was his -duty to have defied. Yet we cannot withhold from him our deep -sympathy; for he was born in terrible times--to witness the -death-throes of his country's agony, and to share in them. It was no -longer a question of independence, but only of the choice of -servitudes. Judah was like a silly and trembling sheep between two -huge beasts of prey.[821] - -Only thus can we account for the strange apostasies--"the abominations -of the heathen"--with which he permitted the Temple to be polluted; and -for the ill-treatment which he allowed to be inflicted on Jeremiah and -other prophets, to whom in his heart he felt inclined to listen. - -What these abominations were we read with amazement in the eighth -chapter of Ezekiel. The prophet is carried in vision to Jerusalem, and -there he sees the Asherah--"the image which provoketh to -jealousy"--which had so often been erected and destroyed and re-erected. -Then through a secret door he sees creeping things, and abominable -beasts, and the idol-blocks of the House of Israel portrayed upon the -wall, while several elders of Israel stood before them and adored, with -censers in their hands--among whom he must specially have grieved to see -Jaazaneiah, the son of Shaphan,[822] flattering himself, as did his -followers, that in that dark chamber Jehovah saw them not. Next at the -northern gate he sees Zion's daughters weeping for Tammuz, or Adonis. -Once more, in the inner court of the Temple, between the porch and the -altar, he sees about twenty-five men with their backs to the altar, and -their faces to the east; and they worshipped the sun towards the east; -and, lo! they put the vine branch to their nose.[823] Were not these -crimes sufficient to evoke the wrath of Jehovah, and to alienate His ear -from prayers offered by such polluted worshippers? Egypt, Assyria, -Syria, Chalda, all contributed their idolatrous elements to the -detestable syncretism; and the king and the priests ignored, permitted, -or connived at it.[824] This must surely be answered for. How could it -have been otherwise? The king and the priests were the official -guardians of the Temple, and these aberrations could not have gone on -without their cognisance. There was another party of sheer formalists, -headed by men like the priest Pashur, who thought to make talismans of -rites and shibboleths, but had no sincerity of heart-religion.[825] To -these, too, Jeremiah was utterly opposed. In his opinion Josiah's -reformation had failed. Neither Ark, nor Temple, nor sacrifice were -anything in the world to him in comparison with true religion. All the -prophets with scarcely one exception are anti-ritualists; but none more -decidedly so than the prophet-priest. His name is associated in -tradition with the hiding of the Ark, and a belief in its ultimate -restoration; yet to Jeremiah, apart from the moral and spiritual truths -of which it was the material symbol, the Ark was no better than a wooden -chest. His message from Jehovah is, "I will give you pastors according -to My heart, ... and they shall say no more, 'The Ark of the Covenant of -the Lord': neither shall it come to mind; neither shall they remember -it; neither shall they miss it; neither shall it be made any more."[826] - -Doom followed the guilt and folly of king, priests, and people. If -political wisdom were insufficient to show Zedekiah that the necessities -of the case were an indication of God's will, he had the warnings of the -prophets constantly ringing in his ears, and the assurance that he must -remain faithful to Nebuchadrezzar. But he was in fear of his own princes -and courtiers. A combined embassy reached him from the kings of Edom, -Ammon, Moab, Tyre and Sidon, urging him to join in a league against -Babylon.[827] This embassy was supported by a powerful party in -Jerusalem. Their solicitations were rendered more plausible by the -recent accession (B.C. 590) of the young and vigorous Pharaoh -Hophrah--the Apries of Herodotus[828]--to the throne of Egypt, and by -the recrudescence of that incurable disease of Hebrew politics, a -confidence in the idle promises of Egypt to supply the confederacy with -men and horses.[829] In vain did Jeremiah and Ezekiel uplift their -warning voices. The blind confidence of the king and of the nobles was -sustained by the flattering visions and promises of false prophets, -prominent among whom was a certain Hananiah, the son of Azur, of Gibeon, -"the prophet."[830] To indicate the futility of the contemplated -rebellion, Jeremiah had made "throngs and poles" with yokes, and had -sent them to the kings, whose embassy had reached Jerusalem, with a -message of the most emphatic distinctness, that Nebuchadrezzar was God's -appointed servant, and that they must serve him till God's own appointed -time. If they obeyed this intimation, they would be left undisturbed in -their own lands; if they disobeyed it, they would be scourged into -absolute submission by the sword, the famine, and the pestilence. -Jeremiah delivered the same oracle to his own king.[831] - -The warning was rendered unavailing by the conduct of Hananiah. He -prophesied that within two full years God would break the yoke of the -King of Babylon; and that the captive Jeconiah, and the nobles, and -the vessels of the House of the Lord would be brought back. Jeremiah, -by way of an acted parable, had worn round his neck one of his own -yokes. Hananiah, in the Temple, snatched it off, broke it to pieces, -and said, "So will I break the yoke of Nebuchadrezzar from the neck of -all nations within the space of two full years."[832] - -We can imagine the delight, the applause, the enthusiasm with which -the assembled people listened to these bold predictions. Hananiah -argued with them, to speak, in shorthand, for he appealed to their -desires and to their prejudices. It is always the tendency of nations -to say to their prophets, "Say not unto us hard things: speak smooth -things; prophesy deceits." - -Against Hananiah personally there seems to have been no charge, except -that in listening to the lying spirit of his own desires he could not -hear the true message of God. But he did not stand alone.[833] Among -the children of the captivity, his promises were echoed by two -downright false prophets, Ahab and Zedekiah, the son of Maaseiah, who -prophesied lies in God's name. They were men of evil life, and a -fearful fate overtook them. Their words against Babylon came to the -ears of Nebuchadrezzar, and they were "roasted in the fire," so that -the horror of their end passed into a proverb and a curse.[834] Truly -God fed these false prophets with wormwood, and gave them poisonous -water to drink.[835] - -After the action of Hananiah, Jeremiah went home stricken and ashamed: -apparently he never again uttered a public discourse in the Temple. It -took him by surprise; and he was for the moment, perhaps, daunted by -the plausive echo of the multitude to the lying prophet. But when he -got home the answer of Jehovah came: "Go and tell Hananiah, Thou hast -broken the yokes of wood; but thou hast made for them yokes of iron. I -have put a yoke of iron on the necks of all these nations, that they -may serve Nebuchadrezzar. Hear now, Hananiah, The Lord hath not sent -thee: thou makest this people to trust in a lie. Behold, this year -thou shalt die, because thou hast spoken revolt against the Lord. What -hath the chaff to do with the wheat? saith the Lord."[836] - -Two months after Hananiah lay dead, and men's minds were filled with -fear. They saw that God's word was indeed as a fire to burn, and as a -hammer to dash in pieces.[837] But meanwhile Zedekiah had been -over-persuaded to take the course which the true prophets had -forbidden. Misled by the false prophets and mincing prophetesses whom -Ezekiel denounced,[838] who daubed men's walls with whitened plaster, -he had sent an embassy to Pharaoh Hophrah, asking for an army of -infantry and cavalry to support his rebellion from Assyria.[839] In -the eyes of Jeremiah and Ezekiel the crime did not only consist in -defying the exhortations of those whom Zedekiah knew to be Jehovah's -accredited messengers. In mitigation of this offence he might have -pleaded the extreme difficulty of discriminating the truth amid the -ceaseless babble of false pretenders.[840] But, on the other hand, he -had broken the solemn oath which he had taken to Nebuchadrezzar in the -name of God, and the sacred covenant which he seems to have twice -ratified with him.[841] This it was which raised the indignation of -the faithful, and led Ezekiel to prophesy:-- - - "Shall he prosper? - Shall he escape that doeth such things? - Or shall he break the covenant and be believed? - 'As I live,' saith the Lord God, 'surely in the place where the king - dwelleth that made him king, - Whose oath he despised and whose covenant he broke, - Even with him in the midst of Babylon, shall he die.'"[842] - -Sad close for a dynasty which had now lasted for nearly five centuries! - -As for Pharaoh, he too was an eagle, as Nebuchadrezzar was--a great -eagle with great wings and many feathers, but not so great. The -trailing vine of Judah bent her roots towards him, but it should -wither in the furrows when the east wind touched it.[843] - -The result of Zedekiah's alliance with Egypt was the intermission of -his yearly tribute to Assyria; and at last, in the ninth year of -Zedekiah, Nebuchadrezzar was aroused to put down this Palestinian -revolt, supported as it was by the vague magnificence of Egypt. -Jeremiah had said, "Pharaoh, the King of Egypt, is but a noise [or -desolation]: he hath passed the time appointed."[844] - -This was about the year 589. In 598 Nebuchadrezzar had carried -Jehoachin into captivity, and ever since then some of his forces had -been engaged in the vain effort to capture Tyre, which still, after a -ten years' siege, drew its supplies from the sea, and remained -impregnable on her island rock. He did not choose to raise this -long-continued siege by diverting the troops to beleaguer so strong a -fortress as Jerusalem, and therefore he came in person from Babylon. - -In Ezek. xxi. 20-24 we have a singular and vivid glimpse of his march. -On his way he came to a spot where two roads branched off before him. -One led to Rabbath, the capital of Ammon, on the east of Jordan; the -other to Jerusalem, on the west. Which road should he take? Personally, -it was a matter of indifference; so he threw the burden of -responsibility upon his gods by leaving the decision to the result of -belomancy.[845] Taking in his hand a sheaf of brightened arrows, he held -them upright, and decided to take the route indicated by the fall of the -greater number of arrows. He confirmed his uncertainty by consulting -teraphim, and by hepatoscopy--_i.e._, by examining the liver of slain -victims. Rabbath and the Ammonites were not to be spared, but it was -upon the covenant-breaking king and city that the first vengeance was -to fall.[846] And this is what the prophet has to say to Zedekiah:-- - -"And thou, O deadly-wounded wicked one, the prince of Israel, whose -day is come in the time of the iniquity of the end; thus saith the -Lord God, 'Remove the mitre, and take off the crown. This shall be not -thus. Exalt the low, and abase that which is high. An overthrow, -overthrow, overthrow, will I make it: this also shall be no more, -until He come whose right it is: and I will give it Him."[847] - -So (B.C. 587) Jerusalem was delivered over to siege, even as Ezekiel -had sketched upon a tile.[848] It was to be assailed in the old -Assyrian manner--as we see it represented in the British Museum -bas-relief, where Sennacherib is portrayed in the act of besieging -Lachish--with forts, mounds, and battering-rams; and Ezekiel had also -been bidden to put up an iron plate between him and his pictured city, -to represent the mantelet from behind which the archers shot. - -In this dread crisis Zedekiah sent Zephaniah, the son of Maaseiah, the -priest, and Jehucal, to Jeremiah, entreating his prayers for the -city,[849] for he had not yet been put in prison. Doubtless he prayed, -and at first it looked as if deliverance would come. Pharaoh Hophrah -put in motion the Egyptian army with its Carian mercenaries and -Soudanese negroes, and Nebuchadrezzar was sufficiently alarmed to -raise the siege and go to meet the Egyptians. The hopes of the people -probably rose high, though multitudes seized the opportunity to fly -to the mountains.[850] The circumstances closely resembled those under -which Sennacherib had raised the siege of Jerusalem to go to meet -Tirhakah the Ethiopian; and perhaps there were some, and the king -among them, who looked that such a wonder might be vouchsafed to him -through the prayers of Jeremiah as had been vouchsafed to Hezekiah -through the prayers of Isaiah. Not for a moment did Jeremiah encourage -these vain hopes. To Zephaniah, as to an earlier deputation from the -king, when he sent Pashur with him to inquire of the prophet, Jeremiah -returned a remorseless answer. It is too late. Pharaoh shall be -defeated; even if the Chaldan army were smitten, its wounded soldiers -would suffice to besiege and burn Jerusalem, and take into captivity -the miserable inhabitants after they had suffered the worst horrors of -a besieged city.[851] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[813] Comp. Jer. xxiii. 6: Jehovah-Tsidkenu. - -[814] Ezek. xvii. 12-14. - -[815] Ezek. xvii. 1-6. - -[816] Jer. xxxiv. 8-11. - -[817] Jer. xxxiv. 19. Comp. Gen. xv. 17. - -[818] This is strikingly shown by his piteous remark to them in Jer. -xxxviii. 5. - -[819] He first sent two of Jeremiah's friends, Elasah and Gemariah, -the son of Shaphan. - -[820] Some critics have doubted the authenticity of Jer. li., lii. - -[821] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 14-21; Stanley, ii. 528; Milman, i. 394. - -[822] Shaphan's other sons, Gemariah, Ahikam, Elasah, and his grandson -Gedaliah, were friends of Jeremiah. - -[823] Ezek. viii. 17. The allusion seems to be to a custom like that -of the Parsees, who hold a branch of tamarisk or pomegranate twigs -(called _barsom_) before their mouths when they adore the sacred fire. -Strabo, xv. 732; Spiegel, _Zendavesta_, ii., p. lxviii; _Eran. -Alterthumsk._, iii. 571 (Orelli, _ad loc._). Lightfoot explains it, -"add fuel to their wrath." - -[824] Ezek. xvi. 15-34. - -[825] Jer. vii. 4, 21-28, viii. 8, xxiii. 31-33, xxxi. 33, 34. - -[826] Jer. iii. 15, 16. - -[827] Jer. xxvii. 3. - -[828] Herod., ii. 161. - -[829] Psammis, the son of Necho, only reigned six years; Hophrah (B.C. -594) was his son. - -[830] The LXX. calls him "the false prophet." - -[831] Jer. xxvii. 1-8, 12-18. On vv. 16-22 see the LXX. - -[832] Here (Jer. xxviii. 11, and in xxxiv. 1, xxxix. 5) the name is -written "Nebuchadnezzar"; everywhere else in Jeremiah it is -"Nebuchadrezzar." - -[833] Part of his dispute with Jeremiah turned on the recovery or -non-recovery of the Temple vessels. Zedekiah is said to have given a -set of silver vessels to replace the old ones (Baruch i. 8). - -[834] Jer. xxix. 21-23. - -[835] Jer. xxiii. 9-32. - -[836] Jer. xxviii. 13-16, xxiii. 28. - -[837] Jer. xxiii. 29. - -[838] Ezek. xiii. 1-23. - -[839] Ezek. xvii. 25. - -[840] Josephus rightly attributes the unfortunate career of Zedekiah -to the weakness with which he listened to evil counsellors, and to the -insolent multitude. - -[841] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 13; Jer. lii. 3. - -[842] Ezek. xvii. 15, 16, 18, 19. - -[843] Ezek. xvii. 7-10. - -[844] Jer. xlvi. 17. - -[845] Another form of belomancy is still commonly practised among the -Arabs. Three arrows are placed in a vessel: on one of them is written, -"My God permits me"; on another, "My God forbids me"; the third is -blank. They are then shaken, and the decision is guided by the one -which falls out first. Comp. Homer, _Iliad_, iii. 316; _Speaker's -Commentary_, _ad loc._ - -[846] Ezek. xxi. 28-32. - -[847] An allusion to the restoration of Jeconiah or his descendants, -and to the far-off Messiah, meek and lowly. - -[848] Ezek. iv. 1-3. - -[849] Jer. xxxvii. 3. - -[850] Ezek. vii. 16. - -[851] Jer. xxi. 1-10, xxxvii. 1-17. Josephus says that Pharaoh was -defeated (_Antt._, X. vii. 3). Jeremiah merely says that he and his -army returned to their own land. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXVII - - _JEREMIAH AND HIS PROPHECIES_ - - JER. i. 1-v. 31 - - "Count me o'er earth's chosen heroes--they were souls that - stood alone, - While the men they agonised for hurled the contumelious - stone; - Stood serene, and down the future saw the golden beam incline - To the side of perfect justice, mastered by their faith - divine, - By one man's plain truth to manhood and to God's supreme - design." - LOWELL. - - -Truly Jeremiah was a prophet of evil. The king might have addressed -him in the words with which Agamemnon reproaches Kalchas.[852] - - "Augur accursed! denouncing mischief still: - Prophet of plagues, for ever boding ill! - Still must that tongue some wounding message bring, - And still thy priestly pride provoke thy king." - -Never was there a sadder man.[853] Like Phocion, he believed in the -enemies of his country more than he believed in his own people. He saw -"Too late" written upon everything. He saw himself all but universally -execrated as a coward, as a traitor, as one who weakened the nerves -and damped the courage of those who were fighting against fearful -odds for their wives and children, the ashes of their fathers, their -altars, and their hearths. It had become his fixed conviction that any -prophets--and there were a multitude of them--who prophesied peace -were false prophets, and _ipso facto_ proved themselves conspirators -against the true well-being of the land.[854] In point of fact, -Jeremiah lived to witness the death-struggle of the idea of religion -in its predominantly national character (vii. 8-16, vi. 8). "The -continuity of the national faith refused to be bound up with the -continuance of the nation. When the nation is dissolved into -individual elements, the continuity and ultimate victory of the true -faith depends on the relations of Jehovah to individual souls out of -which the nation shall be bound up."[855] - -And now a sad misfortune happened to Jeremiah. His home was not at -Jerusalem, but at Anathoth, though he had long been driven from his -native village by the murderous plots of his own kindred, and of those -who had been infuriated by his incessant prophecies of doom. When the -Chaldans retired from Jerusalem to encounter Pharaoh, he left the -distressed city for the land of Benjamin, "to receive his portion from -thence in the midst of the people"--apparently, for the sense is -doubtful, to claim his dues of maintenance as a priest. But at the -city gate he was arrested by Irijah, the son of Shelemiah, the captain -of the watch, who charged him with the intention of deserting to the -Chaldans. Jeremiah pronounced the charge to be a lie; but Irijah took -him before the princes, who hated him, and consigned him to dreary and -dangerous imprisonment in the house of Jonathan the scribe. In the -vaults of this "house of the pit" he continued many days.[856] The -king sympathised with him: he would gladly have delivered him, if he -could, from the rage of the princes; but he did not dare.[857] - -Meanwhile, the siege went on, and the people never forgot the anguish -of despair with which they waited the reinvestiture of the city. Ever -since that day it has been kept as a fast--the fast of Tebeth. -Zedekiah, yearning for some advice, or comfort--if comfort were to be -had--from the only man whom he really trusted, sent for Jeremiah to -the palace, and asked him in despicable secrecy, "Is there any word -from the Lord?" The answer was the old one: "Yes! Thou shalt be -delivered into the hands of the King of Babylon." Jeremiah gave it -without quailing, but seized the opportunity to ask on what plea he -was imprisoned. Was he not a prophet? Had he not prophesied the return -of the Chaldan host? Where now were all the prophets who had -prophesied peace? Would not the king at least save him from the -detestable prison in which he was dying by inches? - -The king heard his petition, and he was removed to a better prison in -the court of the watch, where he received his daily piece of bread out -of the bakers' street until all the bread in the city was spent. - -For now utter famine came upon the wretched Jews, to add to the -horrors and accidents of the siege. If we would know what that famine -was in its appalling intensity, we must turn to the Book of -Lamentations. Those elegies, so unutterably plaintive, may not be by -the prophet himself, but only by his school; but they show us what was -the frightful condition of the people of Jerusalem before and during -the last six months of the siege. "The sword of the wilderness"--the -roving and plundering Bedouin--made it impossible to get out of the -city in any direction. Things were as dreadfully hopeless as they had -been in Samaria when it was besieged by Benhadad.[858] Hunger and -thirst reduce human nature to its most animal conditions. They -obliterate the merest elements of morality. They make men like beasts, -and reveal the ferocity which is never quite dead in any but the -purest and loftiest souls. They arouse the least human instincts of -the aboriginal animal. The day came when there was no more bread left -in Jerusalem.[859] The fair and ruddy Nazarites, who had been purer -than snow, whiter than milk, more ruddy than corals, lovely as -sapphires, became like withered boughs,[860] and even their friends -did not recognise them in those ghastly and emaciated figures which -crept about the streets. The daughters of Zion, more cruel in their -hunger than the very jackals, lost the instincts of pity and -motherhood. Mothers and fathers devoured their own little unweaned -children.[861] There was parricide as well as infanticide in the -horrible houses. They seemed to plead that none could blame them, -since the lives of many had become an intolerable anguish, and no man -had bread for his little ones, and their tongues cleaved to the roof -of their mouth. All that happened six centuries later, during the -siege of Jerusalem by Titus, happened now. Then Martha the daughter of -Nicodemus ben-Gorion, once a lady of enormous wealth, was seen picking -the grains of corn from the offal of the streets; now the women who -had fed delicately and been brought up in scarlet were seen sitting -desolate on heaps of dung.[862] And Jehovah did not raise His hand to -save His guilty and dying people. It was too late! - -And as is always the case in such extremities, there were men who stood -defiant and selfish amid the universal misery. Murder, oppression, and -luxury continued to prevail. The godless nobles did not intermit the -building of their luxurious houses, asserting to themselves and others -that, after all, the final catastrophe was not near at hand. The sudden -death of one of them--Pelatiah, the son of Benaiah--while Ezekiel was -prophesying, terrified the prophet so much that he flung himself on his -face and cried with a loud voice, "Ah, Lord God! wilt Thou make a full -end of the remnant of Israel?" But on the others this death by the -visitation of God seems to have produced no effect; and the glory of God -left the city, borne away upon its cherubim-chariot.[863] - -Even under the stress of these dreadful circumstances the Jews held -out with that desperate tenacity which has often been shown by nations -fighting behind strong walls for their very existence, but by no -nation more decidedly than by the Jews. And if the rebel-party, and -the lying prophets who had brought the city to this pass, still -entertained any hopes either of a diversion caused by Pharaoh -Hophrah, or of some miraculous deliverance such as that which had -saved the city from Sennacherib years earlier, it is not unnatural -that they should have regarded Jeremiah with positive fury. For he -still continued to prophesy the captivity. What specially angered them -was his message to the people that all who remained in Jerusalem -should die by the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, but that -those who deserted to the Chaldans should live. It was on the ground -of his having said this that they had imprisoned him as a deserter; -and when Pashur and his son Gedaliah heard that he was still saying -this, they and the other princes entreated Zedekiah to put him to -death as a pernicious traitor, who weakened the hands of the patriot -soldiers. Jeremiah was not guilty of the lack of patriotism with which -they charged him. The day of independence had passed for ever, and -Babylon, not Egypt, was the appointed suzerain. The counselling of -submission--as many a victorious chieftain has been forced at last to -counsel it, from the days of Hannibal to those of Thiers--is often the -true and the only possible patriotism in doomed and decadent nations. -Zedekiah timidly abandoned the prophet to the rage of his enemies; but -being afraid to murder him openly as Urijah had been murdered, they -flung him into a well in the dungeon of Malchiah, the king's son. Into -the mire of this pit he sank up to the arms, and there they purposely -left him to starve and rot.[864] But if no Israelite pitied him, his -condition moved the compassion of Ebed-Melech, an Ethiopian, one of -the king's eunuch-chamberlains. He hurried to the king in a storm of -pity and indignation. He found him sitting, as a king should do, at -the post of danger in the gate of Benjamin; for Zedekiah was not a -physical, though he was a moral, coward. Ebed-Melech told the king -that Jeremiah was dying of starvation, and Zedekiah bade him take -three[865] men with him and rescue the dying man. The faithful -Ethiopian hurried to a cellar under the treasury, took with him some -old, worn fragments of robes, and, letting them down by cords, called -to Jeremiah to put them under his arm-pits. He did so, and they drew -him up into the light of day, though he still remained in prison. - -It seems to have been at this time that, in spite of his grim -vaticination of immediate retribution, Jeremiah showed his serene -confidence in the ultimate future by accepting the proposal of his -cousin Hanameel to buy some of the paternal fields at Anathoth, though -at that very moment they were in the hands of the Chaldans. Such an -act publicly performed must have caused some consolation to the -besieged, just as did the courage of the Roman senator who gave a good -price for the estate outside the walls of Rome on which Hannibal was -actually encamped. - -Then Zedekiah once more secretly sent for him, and implored him to tell -the unvarnished truth. "If I do," said the prophet, "will you not kill -me? and will you in any case hearken to me?" Zedekiah swore not to -betray him to his enemies; and Jeremiah told him that, even at that -eleventh hour, if he would go out and make submission to the -Babylonians, the city should not be burnt, and he should save the lives -of himself and of his family. Zedekiah believed him, but pleaded that -he was afraid of the mockery of the deserters to whom he might be -delivered. Jeremiah assured him that he should not be so delivered, and -that, if he refused to obey, nothing remained for the city, and for him -and his wives and children, but final ruin. The king was too weak to -follow what he must now have felt to be the last chance which God had -opened out for him. He could only "attain to half-believe." He entrusted -the result to chance, with miserable vacillation of purpose; and the -door of hope was closed upon him. His one desire was to conceal the -interview; and if it came to the ears of the princes--of whom he was -shamefully afraid--he begged Jeremiah to say that he had only entreated -the king not to send him back to die in Jonathan's prison. - -As he had suspected, it became known that Jeremiah had been summoned -to an interview with the king. They questioned the prophet in prison. -He told them the story which the king had suggested to him, and the -truth remained undiscovered. For this deflection from exact truth it -is tolerably certain that, in the state of men's consciences upon the -subject of veracity in those days, the prophet's moral sense did not -for a moment reproach him. He remained in his prison, guarded probably -by the faithful Ebed-Melech, until Jerusalem was taken. - -Let us pity the dreadful plight of Zedekiah, aggravated as it was by -his weak temperament. "He stands at the head of a people determined to -defend itself, but is himself without either hope or courage."[866] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[852] Homer, _Iliad_, i. 106-109. - -[853] But it must not be forgotten that Jer. xxxi. 1-34 is so hopeful -that it has been called "the Gospel before Christ." - -[854] Jer. vi. 14, viii. 11; Ezek. xiii. 10. - -[855] W. R. Smith, "Prophets" (_Enc. Brit._). - -[856] Jer. xxxvii, 11-15. - -[857] Jer xxxviii. 5. The Jewish aristocracy consisted, says Grtz, of -three classes: the _ben hammelech_, or "king's sons"--_i.e._, princes -of the blood-royal; the _rosh aboth_, "heads of the fathers," or -_zekenm_, "elders"; and the _abhod hammelech_, "king's servants," or -"courtiers" (ii. 446). - -[858] Lam. v. 4. - -[859] Jer. xxxvii. 21, xxxviii. 9, lii. 6. - -[860] Lam. iv. 7, 8. - -[861] Lam. iv. 10, ii. 20; Ezek. v. 10; Baruch ii. 3. - -[862] Lam. iv. 5. See Stanley, _Lectures_, ii. 470. - -[863] Ezek. xi. 22. - -[864] This may possibly be alluded to in Psalm lxix. 2. - -[865] Jer. xxxviii. 10, A.V., "thirty." - -[866] Van Oort, iv. 52. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXVIII - - _THE FALL OF JERUSALEM_ - - B.C. 586 - - 2 KINGS xxv. 1-21 - - "In that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all - nations."--ZECH. xii. 3. - - "An end is come, the end is come; it awaketh against thee: behold - the end is come."--EZEK. vii. 6. - - "Behold yon sterile spot - Where now the wandering Arab's tent - Flaps in the desert blast; - There once old Salem's haughty fane - Reared high to heaven its thousand golden domes, - And in the blushing face of day - Exposed its shameful glory." - SHELLEY. - - -After the siege had lasted for a year and a half, all but one day, at -midnight the besiegers made a breach in the northern city wall.[867] -It was a day of terrible remembrance, and throughout the exile it was -observed as a solemn fast.[868] - -Nebuchadrezzar was no longer in person before the walls. He had other -war-like operations and other sieges on hand--the sieges of Tyre, -Asekah, and Lachish--as well as Jerusalem. He had therefore -established his headquarters at Lachish, and did not superintend the -final operations against the city.[869] But now that all had become -practically hopeless, and the capture of the rest of Jerusalem was -only a matter of a few days more, Zedekiah and his few best surviving -princes and soldiers fled by night through the opposite quarter of the -city. There was a little unwatched postern between two walls near the -king's garden, and through this he and his escort fled, hoping to -reach the Arabah, and make good his escape, perhaps to the -Wady-el-Arish, which he could reach in five hours, through the wilds -beyond the Jordan.[870] The heads of the king and his followers were -muffled, and they carried on their shoulders their choicest -possessions.[871] But he was betrayed by some of the mean -deserters,[872] and pursued by the Chaldans. His movements were -doubtless impeded by the presence of his harem and his children. His -little band of warriors could offer no resistance, and fled in all -directions. Zedekiah, his family, and attendants were taken prisoners, -and carried to Riblah to appear before the mighty conqueror.[873] -Nebuchadrezzar showed no pity towards one whom he had elevated to the -throne, and who had violated his most solemn assurances by intriguing -with his enemies. He brought him to trial, and doomed him to witness -with his own eyes the massacre of his two sons and of his attendants. -After he had endured this anguish, worse than death, his eyes were put -out, and, bound in double fetters,[874] he was sent to Babylon, where -he ended his miserable days. To blind a king deprived him of all hope -of recovering the throne, and was therefore in ancient days a common -punishment.[875] The LXX. adds that he was sent by the Babylonians to -grind a mill--[Greek: eis oikion mylnos]. This is probably a -reminiscence of the blinded Samson. But thus were fulfilled with -startling literalness two prophecies which might well have seemed to -be contradictory.[876] For Jeremiah had said (xxxiv. 3),-- - -"Thine eyes shall behold the eyes of the King of Babylon, and he shall -speak with thee mouth to mouth, and thou shalt go to Babylon." - -Whereas Ezekiel had said (xii. 13),-- - -"I will bring him to Babylon, the land of the Chaldans; yet shall he -not see it, though he shall die there." - -Henceforth Zedekiah was forgotten, and his place knew him no more. We -can only hope that in his blindness and solitude he was happier than -he had been on the throne of Judah, and that before death came to end -his miseries he found peace with God. - -The conqueror did not come to spoil the city. He left that task to three -great officers,--Nebuzaradan, the captain of the guard, or chief -executioner;[877] Nebushasban, the Rabsaris, or chief of the eunuchs; -and Nergalshareser, the Rabmag, or chief of the magicians. They took -their station by the Middle Gate, and first gave up the city to pillage -and massacre. No horror was spared.[878] The sepulchres were rifled for -treasure; the young Levites were slain in the house of their Sanctuary; -women were violated; maidens and hoary-headed men were slain. "Princes -were hanged up by the hand, and the faces of elders were dishonoured; -priest and prophet were slain in the Sanctuary of the Lord,"[879] till -the blood flowed like red wine from the winepress over the desecrated -floor.[880] The guilty city drank at the hand of God the dregs of the -cup of His fury.[881] It was the final vengeance. "The punishment of -thine iniquity is accomplished, O daughter of Zion. He will no more -carry thee away into captivity."[882] And, meanwhile, the little Bedouin -principalities were full of savage exultation at the fate of their -hereditary foe.[883] This was felt by the Jews as a culmination of their -misery, that they became a derision to their enemies. The callous -insults hurled at them by the neighbouring tribes in their hour of shame -awoke that implacable wrath against Gebal and Ammon and Amalek which -finds its echo in the Prophets and in the Psalms.[884] - -After this the devoted capital was given up to destruction. The Temple -was plundered. All that remained of its often-rifled splendours was -carried away, such as the ancient pillars Jachin and Boaz, the -masterpieces of Hiram's art, the caldron, the brazen sea, and all the -vessels of gold, of silver, and of brass. Then the walls of the city -were dismantled and broken down. The Temple, and the palace, and all the -houses of the princes were committed to the flames. As for the principal -remaining inhabitants, Seraiah the chief priest, perhaps the grandson of -Hilkiah and the grandfather of Ezra, Zephaniah the second priest, the -three Levitic doorkeepers, the secretary of war, five of the greatest -nobles who "saw the king's face,"[885] and sixty of the common people -who had been marked out for special punishment, were taken to Riblah, -and there massacred by order of Nebuchadrezzar.[886] With these -Nebuchadrezzar took away as his prisoners a multitude of the wealthier -inhabitants, leaving behind him but the humblest artisans. As the -craftsmen and smiths had been deported,[887] these poor people busied -themselves in agriculture, as vine-dressers and husbandmen. The existing -estates were divided among them; and being few in number, they found the -amplest sustenance in treasures of wheat and barley, and oil and honey, -and summer fruits, which they kept concealed for safety, as the -fellaheen of Palestine do to this day.[888] - -According to the historic chapters added to the prophecies of -Jeremiah, the whole number of captives carried away from Jerusalem by -Nebuchadrezzar in the seventh, the eighteenth, and the twenty-third -years of his reign were 4,600.[889] The completeness of the desolation -might well have caused the heart-rending outcry of Psalm lxxix.: "O -God, the heathen are come into Thine inheritance; Thy holy Temple have -they defiled; they have made Jerusalem a heap of stones. The dead -bodies of Thy servants have they given to be meat unto the fowls of -heaven, and the flesh of Thy saints unto the beasts of the land. Their -blood have they shed like water round about Jerusalem; and there was -no man to bury them." - -Among the remnant of the people was Jeremiah. Nebuzaradan had received -from his king the strictest injunctions to treat him honourably; for he -had heard from the deserters that he had always opposed the rebellion, -and had prophesied the issue of the siege. He was indeed sent in -manacles to Ramah;[890] but there Nebuchadrezzar gave him free choice to -do exactly as he liked--either to accompany him to Babylon, where he -should be well treated and cared for, or to return to Jerusalem, and -live where he liked. This was his desire. Nebuchadrezzar therefore -dismissed him with food and a present;[891] and he returned. The LXX. -and Vulgate represent him as sitting weeping over the ruins of -Jerusalem, and tradition says that he sought for his lamentations a cave -still existing near the Damascus Gate. Of this Scripture knows nothing. -But the melancholy prophet was only reserved for further tragedies. He -had lived one of the most afflicted of human lives. A man of tender -heart and shrinking disposition, he had been called to set his face like -a flint against kings, and nobles, and mobs. Worse than this, being -himself a prophet and priest, naturally led to sympathise with both, he -was the doomed antagonist of both--victim of "one of the strongest of -human passions, the hatred of priests against a priest who attacks his -own order, the hatred of prophets against a prophet who ventures to have -a voice and a will of his own." Even his own family had plotted against -his life at humble Anathoth;[892] and when he retreated to Jerusalem, he -found himself at the centre of the storm. Now perhaps he hoped for a -gleam of sunset peace. But his hopes were disappointed. He had to tread -the path of anguish and hatred to the bitter end, as he had trodden it -for nearly fifty years of the troubled life which had followed his call -in early boyhood. - -"But, in the case of Jerusalem," says Dean Stanley, "both its first -and second destruction have the peculiar interest of involving the -dissolution of a religious dispensation, combined with the agony of an -expiring nation, such as no other people has survived, and, by -surviving, carried on the living recollection, first of one, and then -of the other, for centuries after the first shock was over."[893] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[867] Jos., _Antt._, X. viii. 2; 2 Chron. xxxii. 5, xxxiii. 14. First -and last, the siege seems to have lasted one year, five months, and -twenty-seven days. - -[868] Zech. viii. 19. - -[869] The inscriptions of Nebuchadrezzar which have been as yet -deciphered speak of his sumptuous buildings and of his worship of the -gods rather than of his conquests. See _Records of the Past_, vii. -69-78. - -[870] Robinson, _Bibl. Res._, ii. 536. Some suppose that "the king's -garden" was near the mouth of the Tyropoeon Valley. - -[871] Ezek. xii. 12. Perhaps the gate alluded to is the fountain gate -of Neh. iii. 15. Ezekiel seems to speak of "digging through the wall." -Robinson says that a trace of the outermost wall still exists in the -rude pathway which crosses the mouth of the Tyropoeon on a mound hard -by the old mulberry tree which marks the traditional site of Isaiah's -martyrdom. - -[872] Jos., _Antt._, X. viii. 2. - -[873] Traces of his presence are found in inscriptions in the Wady of -the Dog near Beyrout, and in Wady Brissa. See Sayce, _Proceedings of -the Bibl. Arch. Soc._, November 1881. - -[874] 2 Kings xxv. 7. See Layard, _Nineveh_, ii. 376. - -[875] The blinding was sometimes done by passing a red-hot rod of -silver or brass over the open eyes; sometimes by plucking out the eyes -(Jer. lii. 11, Vulg. _oculos eruit_; 2 Kings xxv. 7, _effodit_). See a -hideous illustration of a yet more brutal process in Botta (_Monum. de -Ninve_, Pl. cxviii.), where Sargon with his own hand is thrusting a -lance into the eyes of a captive prince, whose head is kept steady by -a bridle fastened to a hook through his lips. See also Judg. xvi. 21; -Xen., _Anab._, i. 9, 13; Procopius, _Bel. Pers._, i. 1; Ammianus, -xxvii. 12; Rawlinson, _Ancient Monarchies_, i. 307. - -[876] Jos., _Antt._, X. viii. 2, 3. - -[877] Nebur-zir-iddina, "Nebo bestowed seed." Jer. xxxix. 9, 13, is in -some way corrupt. Ezekiel (ix. 2), however, and Josephus (_Antt._, X. -viii. 2) mention _six_ officers. Nebuzaradan was "chief of the -executioners" (Gen. xxxvii. 36; 1 Kings ii. 25, 35, 46). - -[878] Psalm lxxix. 2, 3. - -[879] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 17; Lam. ii. 21, v. 11, 12. - -[880] To the reminiscences of these scenes are partly due the Talmudic -legend about the blood of Zechariah, the son of Jehoiada, bubbling up -to demand vengeance. Nebudchadrezzar slew a holocaust of human victims -to appease the shade of the wrathful prophet, until the king himself -was terrified, and asked if he wished his whole people to be -slaughtered. Then the blood ceased to bubble. - -[881] See Rawlinson, _Kings of Israel and Judah_, p. 236. - -[882] Lam. iv. 22. - -[883] Psalm lxxix, 1. - -[884] Obad. 14-16; Psalm cxxxvii. 7; 1 Esdras iv. 45. - -[885] Comp. Esther i. 14. - -[886] On these personages see 1 Chron. vi. 13, 14; 2 Kings xxii. 4; -Ezra vii. 1; Jer. xxi. 1, xxxvii. 3, etc. - -[887] Nebuchadrezzar had no doubt needed them for his great buildings -at Babylon, and their deportation would render more difficult any -attempt to refortify Jerusalem. - -[888] Jer. xli. 8, xl. 12. - -[889] Jer. lii. 28-30. In his seventh year, 3,023; in his eighteenth, -832 in his thirty-third, 745 = 4,600. - -[890] Ramah was but five miles from Jerusalem, and at first Jeremiah -may not have been identified (Jer. xl. 1-6). - -[891] The present, if accepted, could only be regarded, under the -circumstances, as part of the necessity of life. It does not fall -under the head of the presents often offered to prophets (1 Sam. ix. -7; 2 Kings iv. 42; Mic. iii. 5, 11; Amos vii. 12). - -[892] Jer. xi. 19-21, xii. 6. - -[893] Stanley, _Lectures_, ii. 515. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXIX - - _GEDALIAH_ - - B.C. 586 - - 2 KINGS xxv. 22-30 - - "Vedi che son un che piango."--DANTE, _Inferno_. - - "No, rather steel thy melting heart - To act the martyr's sternest part, - To watch with firm, unshrinking eye - Thy darling visions as they die, - Till all bright hopes and hues of day - Have faded into twilight grey." - KEBLE. - - -In deciding that he would not accompany Nebuchadrezzar to Babylon, -Jeremiah made the choice of duty. In Chalda he would have lived at -ease, in plenty, in security, amid universal respect. He might have -helped his younger contemporary Ezekiel in his struggle to keep the -exiles in Babylon faithful to their duty and their God. He regarded the -exiles as representing all that was best and noblest in the nation; and -he would have been safe and honoured in the midst of them, under the -immediate protection of the great Babylonian king. On the other hand, to -return to Juda was to return to a defenceless and a distracted people, -the mere dregs of the true nation, the mere phantom of what they once -had been. Surely his life had earned the blessing of repose? But no! The -hopes of the Chosen People, the seed of Abraham, God's servant, could -not be dissevered from the Holy Land. Rest was not for him on this side -of the grave. His only prayer must be, like that which Senancour had -inscribed over his grave, "ternit, deviens mon asile!" The decision -cost him a terrible struggle; but duty called him, and he obeyed. It has -been supposed by some critics[894] that the wild cry of Jer. xv. 10-21 -expresses his anguish at the necessity of casting in his lot with the -remnant; the sense that they needed his protecting influence and -prophetic guidance; and the promise of God that his sacrifice should not -be ineffectual for good to the miserable fragment of his nation, even -though they should continue to struggle against him. - -So with breaking heart he saw Nebuzaradan at Ramah marshalling the -throng of captives for their long journey to the waters of Babylon. -Before them, and before the little band which returned with him to the -burnt Temple, the dismantled city, the desolate house, there lay an -unknown future; but in spite of the exiles' doom it looked brighter -for them than for him, as with tears and sobs they parted from each -other. Then it was that-- - -"A voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, and bitter weeping; Rachel -weeping for her children refuseth to be comforted, because they are -not. Thus saith the Lord, 'Refrain thy voice from weeping, and thine -eyes from tears: for thy work shall be rewarded,' saith the Lord; 'and -they shall come again from the land of the enemy. And there is hope -for thy time to come,' saith the Lord, 'that thy children shall come -again to their own border.'"[895] - -Disappointed in the fidelity of the royal house of Judah, -Nebuchadrezzar had not attempted to place another of them on the throne. -He appointed Gedaliah, the son of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan, his satrap -(_pakd_) over the poor remnant who were left in the land. In this -appointment we probably trace the influence of Jeremiah. There is no one -whom Nebuchadrezzar would have been so likely to consult. Gedaliah was -the son of the prophet's old protector,[896] and his grandfather Shaphan -had been a trusted minister of Josiah. He thoroughly justified the -confidence reposed in him, and under his wise and prosperous rule there -seemed to be every prospect that there would be at least some pale gleam -of returning prosperity. The Jews, who during the period of the siege -had fled into all the neighbouring countries, no sooner heard of his -viceroyalty than they came flocking back from Moab, and Ammon, and Edom. -They found themselves, perhaps for the first time in their lives, in -possession of large estates, from which the exiles of Babylon had been -dispossessed; and favoured by an abundant harvest, "they gathered wine -and summer fruits very much."[897] - -Jerusalem--dismantled, defenceless, burnt--was no longer habitable. It -was all but deserted, so that jackals and hynas prowled even over the -mountain of the Lord's House. All attempt to refortify it would have -been regarded as rebellion, and such a mere "lodge in a garden of -cucumbers" would have been useless to repress the marauding incursions -of the envious Moabites and Edomites, who had looked on with shouts at -the destruction of the city, and exulted when her carved work was -broken down with axes and hammers. Gedaliah therefore fixed his -headquarters at Mizpah, about six miles north of Jerusalem, of which -the lofty eminence could be easily secured.[898] It was the watchtower -from which Titus caught his first glimpses of the Holy City, as many a -traveller does to this day, and the point at which Richard I. averted -his eyes with tears, saying that he was unworthy to look upon the city -which he was unable to save. Here, then, Gedaliah lived, urging upon -his subjects the policy which his friend and adviser Jeremiah had -always supported, and promising them quietness and peace if they would -but accept the logic of circumstances--if they would bow to the -inevitable, and frankly acknowledge the suzerainty of Nebuchadrezzar. -It was perhaps as a pledge of more independence in better days to come -that Nebuzaradan had left Gedaliah in charge of the young daughters of -King Zedekiah, who had with them some of their eunuch-attendants. As -that unfortunate monarch was only thirty-two years old when he was -blinded and carried away, the princesses were probably young girls; -and it has been conjectured that it was part of the Chaldan king's -plan for the future that in time Gedaliah should be permitted to marry -one of them, and re-establish at least a collateral branch of the old -royal house of David. - -How long this respite continued we do not know. The language of -Jeremiah xxxix 2, xli. 1, compared with 2 Kings xxv. 8, might seem to -imply that it only lasted two months. But since Jeremiah does not -mention the year in xli. 1, and as there seems to have been yet -another deportation of Jews by Nebuchadrezzar five years latter (Jer. -lii. 30), which may have been in revenge for the murder of his satrap, -some have supposed that Gedaliah's rule lasted four years. All is -uncertain, and the latter passage is of doubtful authenticity; but it -is at least possible that the vengeful atrocity committed by Ishmael -followed almost immediately after the Chaldan forces were well out of -sight. Respecting these last days of Jewish independence, "History, -leaning semisomnous on her pyramid, muttereth something, but we know -not what it is." - -However this may be, there seem to have been guerilla bands wandering -through the country, partly to get what they could, and partly to -watch against Bedouin marauders. Johanan, the son of Kareah, who was -one of the chief captains among them,[899] came with others to -Gedaliah, and warned him that Baalis, King of Ammon, was intriguing -against him, and trying to induce a certain Ishmael, the son of -Nethaniah, the son of Elishama--who, in some way unknown to us, -represented, perhaps on the female side, the seed royal[900]--to come -and murder him. Gedaliah was of a fine, unsuspicious temperament, and -with rash generosity he refused to believe in the existence of a plot -so ruinous and so useless. Astonished at his noble incredulity, -Johanan then had a secret interview with him, and offered to murder -Ishmael so secretly that no one should know of it. "Why," he asked, -"should this man be suffered to ruin everything, and cause the final -scattering of even the struggling handful of colonists at Mizpah and -in Judah?" Gedaliah forbad his intervention. "Thou shalt not do this," -he said: "thou speakest falsely of Ishmael." - -But Johanan's story was only too true. Shortly afterwards, Ishmael, -with ten confederates,[901] came to visit Gedaliah at Mizpah, perhaps -on the pretext of seeing his kinswomen, the daughters of Zedekiah. -Gedaliah welcomed this ambitious villain and his murderous accomplices -with open-handed hospitality. He invited them all to a banquet in the -fort of Mizpah; and after eating salt with him, Ishmael and his -bravoes first murdered him, and then put promiscuously to the sword -his soldiers, and the Chaldans who had been left to look after -him.[902] The gates of the fort were closed, and the bodies were flung -into a deep well or tank,[903] which had been constructed by Asa in -the middle of the courtyard, when he was fortifying Mizpah against the -attacks of Baasha, King of Israel. - -For two days there was an unbroken silence, and the peasants at Mizpah -remained unaware of the dreadful tragedy. On the third day a sad -procession was seen wending its way up the heights. There were scattered -Jews in Shiloh and Samaria who still remembered Zion; and eighty -pilgrims, weeping as they went, came with shaven beards and rent -garments to bring a _minchah_ and incense to the ruined shrine at -Jerusalem. In the depth of their woe they had even violated a law (Lev. -xix. 28, xxi. 5), of which they were perhaps unaware, by cutting -themselves in sign of their misery. Mizpah would be their last -halting-place on the way to Jerusalem; and the hypocrite Ishmael came -out to them with an invitation to share the hospitality of the murdered -satrap. No sooner had the gate of the charnel-house closed upon -them,[904] than Ishmael and his ten ruffians began to murder this -unoffending company. Crimes more aimless and more brutal than those -committed by this infinitely degenerate scion of the royal house it is -impossible to conceive. The place swam with blood. The story "reads -almost like a page from the annals of the Indian Mutiny." Seventy of the -wretched pilgrims had been butchered and flung into the tank, which must -have been choked with corpses, like the fatal well at Cawnpore,[905] -when the ten survivors pleaded for their lives by telling Ishmael that -they had large treasures of country produce stored in hidden places, -which should be at his disposal if he would spare them.[906] - -As it was useless to make any further attempt to conceal his -atrocities, Ishmael now took the young princesses and the inhabitants -of Mizpah with him, and tried to make good his escape to his patron -the King of Ammon. But the watchful eye of Johanan, the son of Kareah, -had been upon him, and assembling his band he went in swift pursuit. -Ishmael had got no farther than the Pool of Gibeon, when Johanan -overtook him, to the intense joy of the prisoners. A scuffle ensued; -but Ishmael and eight of his blood-stained desperadoes unhappily -managed to make good their escape to the Ammonites. The wretch -vanishes into the darkness, and we hear of him no more. - -Even now the circumstances were desperate. Nebuchadrezzar could not in -honour overlook the frustration of all his plans, and the murder, not -only of his viceroy, but even of his Chaldan commissioners. He would -not be likely to accept any excuses. No course seemed open but that of -flight. There was no temptation to return to Mizpah with its frightful -memories and its corpse-choked tank. From Gibeon the survivors made -their way to Bethlehem, which lay on the road to Egypt, and where they -could be sheltered in the caravanserai of Chimham. Many Jews had -already taken refuge in Egypt. Colonies of them were living in -Pathros, and at Migdol and Noph, under the kindly protection of -Pharaoh Hophrah. Would it not be well to join them? - -In utter perplexity Johanan and the other captains and all the people -came to Jeremiah. How he had escaped the massacre at Mizpah we do not -know; but now he seemed to be the only man left in whose prophetic -guidance they could confide. They entreated him with pathetic -earnestness to show them the will of Jehovah; and he promised to pray -for insight, while they pledged themselves to obey implicitly his -directions. - -The anguish and vacillation of the prophet's mind is shown by the fact -that for ten whole days no light came to him. It seemed as if Judah -was under an irrevocable curse. Whither could they return? What -temptation was there to return? Did not return mean fresh intolerable -miseries? Would they not be torn to pieces by the robber bands from -across the Jordan? And what could be the end of it but another -deportation to Babylon, with perhaps further massacre and starvation? - -All the arguments seemed against this course; and he could see very -clearly that it would be against all the wishes of the down-trodden -fugitives who longed for Egypt, "where we shall see no war, nor hear -the sound of the trumpet, nor have hunger of bread." - -Yet Jeremiah could only give them the message which he believed to -represent the will of God. He bade them return. He assured them that -they need have no fear of the King of Babylon, and that God would -bless them; whereas if they went to Egypt, they would die by the -sword, the famine, and the pestilence. At the same time--doomed always -to thwart the hopes of the multitude--he reproved the hypocrisy which -had sent them to ask God's will when they never intended to do -anything but follow their own. - -Then their anger broke out against him. He was, as always, the prophet -of evil, and they held him more than half responsible for being the -_cause_ of the ruin which he invariably predicted. Johanan and "all -the proud men" (_zedim_) gave him the lie. They told him that the -source of his prophesy was not Jehovah, but the meddling and -pernicious Baruch. Perhaps some of them may have remembered the words -of Isaiah, that a day should come when five cities, of which one -should be called Kir-Cheres ("the City of Destruction")--a play on the -name Kir-Heres, "the City of the Sun," On or Heliopolis should--speak -the language of Canaan and swear by the Lord of hosts, and there -should be an altar in the land of Egypt and a _matstsebah_ at its -border in witness to Jehovah, and that though Egypt should be smitten -she should also be healed.[907] - -So they settled to go to Egypt; and taking with them Jeremiah, and -Baruch, and the king's daughters, and all the remnant, they made their -way to Tahpanhes or Daphne,[908] an advanced post to guard the road to -Syria. Mr. Flinders Petrie in 1886 discovered the site of the city at -Tel Defenneh, and the ruins of the very palace which Pharaoh Hophrah -placed at the disposal of the daughters of his ally Zedekiah. It is -still known by the name of "The Castle of the Jew's Daughters"--_El -Kasr el Bint el Jehudi_.[909] - -In front of this palace was an elevated platform (_mastaba_) of brick, -which still remains. In this brickwork Jeremiah was bidden by the word -of Jehovah to place great stones, and to declare that on that very -platform, over those very stones, Nebuchadrezzar should pitch his -royal tent, when he came to wrap himself in the land of Egypt, as a -shepherd wraps himself in his garment, and to burn the pillars of -Heliopolis with fire.[910] - -Jeremiah still had to face stormy times. At some great festival -assembly at Tahpanhes he bitterly reproached the exiled Jews for their -idolatries. He was extremely indignant with the women who burned -incense to the Queen of Heaven. The multitude, and especially the -women, openly defied him. "We will not hearken to thee," they said. -"We will continue to burn incense, and offer offerings to the Queen of -Heaven, _as we have done, we, and our fathers, our kings, and our -princes, in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem_; for -then had we plenty of victuals, and were well, and saw no evil. It is -only since we have left off making cakes for her and honouring her -that we have suffered hunger and desolation; and our husbands were -always well aware of our proceedings." - -Never was there a more defiantly ostentatious revolt against God and -against His prophet! Remonstrance seemed hopeless. What could Jeremiah -do but menace them with the wrath of Heaven, and tell them that in -sign of the truth of his words the fate of Pharaoh Hophrah should be -the same as the fate of Zedekiah, King of Judah, and should be -inflicted by the hand of Nebuchadrezzar.[911] - -So on the colony of fugitives the curtain of revelation rushes down in -storm. The prophet went on the troubled path which, if tradition be -true, led him at last to martyrdom. He is said to have been stoned by -his infuriated fellow-exiles. But his name lived in the memory of his -people. It was he (they believed) who had hidden from the Chaldans -the Ark and the sacred fire, and some day he should return to reveal -the place of their concealment.[912] When Christ asked His disciples -six hundred years later, "Whom say the people that I am?" one of the -answers was, "Some say Jeremiah or one of the prophets." He became, -so to speak, the guardian saint of the land in which he had suffered -such cruel persecutions. - -But the historian of the Kings does not like to leave the close of his -story in unbroken gloom. He wrote during the Exile. He has narrated -with tears the sad fate of Jehoiachin; and though he does not care to -dwell on the Exile itself, he is glad to narrate one touch of kindness -on the part of the King of Babylon, which he doubtless regarded as a -pledge of mercies yet to come. Twenty-six years had elapsed since the -capture of Jerusalem, and thirty-seven since the captivity of the -exiled king, when Evil-Merodach, the son and successor of -Nebuchadrezzar, took pity on the imprisoned heir of the House of -David.[913] He took Jehoiachin from his dungeon, changed his garments, -spoke words of encouragement to him, gave him a place at his own -table,[914] assigned to him a regular allowance from his own -banquet,[915] and set his throne above the throne of all the other -captive kings who were with him in Babylon. It might seem a trivial -act of mercy, yet the Jews remembered in their records the very day of -the month on which it had taken place, because they regarded it as a -break in the clouds which overshadowed them--as "the first gleam of -heaven's amber in the Eastern grey." - -FOOTNOTES: - -[894] So Grtz and Cheyne. - -[895] Jer. xxxi. 15-17. - -[896] Jer. xxvi. 24. - -[897] Jer. xl. 12. - -[898] Some identify it with _Shaphat_, a mile from Jerusalem. - -[899] They are called _sar_ ("princes"). - -[900] There is no Elishama in the royal genealogy, except a son of -David. Ishmael may have been the son or grandson of some Ammonite -princess. An Elishama was scribe of Jehoiakim (Jer. xxxvi. 12). - -[901] The Hebrew text calls these ten ruffians _rabb hammelech_, -"chief officers of the king" of Ammon. - -[902] Josephus records or conjectures that the governor was -overpowered by wine, and had sunk into slumber (_Antt._, X. ix. 2). - -[903] In Jer. xli. 9, for "because of Gedaliah," the better reading is -"was a great pit" (LXX., [Greek: phrear mega]). - -[904] Ishmael--a marvel of craft and villainy--put into practice the -same stratagem which on a larger scale was employed by Mohammed Ali in -his massacre of the Mamelukes at Cairo in 1806 (Grove, _s.v._ _Bibl. -Dict._). For "the midst of the city" (Jer. xli. 7), we ought to read -"courtyard," as in Josephus. - -[905] Comp. Jehu's treatment of the family of Ahaziah (2 Kings x. 14). - -[906] The dark deed is still commemorated by a Jewish fast, as in the -days of Zechariah (Zech. vii. 3-5, viii. 19). - -[907] Isa. xix. 18-22. - -[908] Jer. ii. 16, xliv. 1; Ezek. xxx. 18; Jer. xliii. 7, xlvi. 14; -Herod., ii. 30. - -[909] Fl. Petrie, _Memoir on Tanis_ (Egypt. Explor. Fund, 4th memoir), -1888. - -[910] Jer. xliii. 13, Beth-shemesh. Only one pillar of the Temple of -the Sun is now standing. It is said to be four thousand years old. It -is certain that Nebuchadrezzar invaded Egypt and defeated Amasis, the -son of Hophrah, B.C. 565, reducing Egypt to "the basest of kingdoms" -(Ezek. xxix. 14, 15). Three of Nebuchadrezzar's terra-cotta cylinders -have been found at Tahpanhes. - -[911] How far the prophecy was fulfilled we do not know. Assyrian and -Egyptian fragments of record show that in the thirty-seventh year of -his reign Nebuchadrezzar invaded Egypt and advanced to Syene (Ezek. -xxix. 10). - -[912] 2 Macc. ii. 1-8; comp. xv. 13-16. The tradition is singular when -we recall the small store which Jeremiah set by the Ark (Jer. iii. 16). - -[913] Evil-Merodach (Avil-Marduk, "Man of Merodach") only reigned two -years, and was then murdered by his brother-in-law Neriglissar -(Berosus _ap._ Jos.: comp. _Ap._, i. 20). The Rabbis have a -story--perhaps founded on that of Gaius and Agrippa I.--that -Evil-Merodach had been imprisoned by his father for wishing his death, -and in prison formed a friendship for Jehoiachin. - -[914] "Lifted up his head." Comp. Gen. xl. 13, 20. - -[915] To be thus [Greek: homotrapezos], or [Greek: syssitos], of the -king was a high honour (Herod., iii. 13, v. 24. Comp. Judg. i. 7; 2 -Sam. ix. 13, etc.). - - - - - EPILOGUE - - "On Jordan's banks the Arab's camels stray, - On Zion's hills the False One's votaries pray, - The Baal-adorer bows on Sinai's steep; - Yet there--e'en there--O God, Thy thunders sleep." - BYRON. - - "God, Thou art Love: I build my faith on that." - BROWNING. - - -Before concluding I should like to add a few words (1) on what some may -regard as the too favourable attitude towards what is called the "Higher -Criticism" adopted in this book; and (2) on the deep, essential, eternal -lessons which we have found in chapter after chapter of it. - -1. As regards the first, I need only say that the one thing I seek, -the sole thing I care for, is Truth,--truth, not tradition. Even St. -Cyprian, devoted as he was to custom and tradition, warns us that -"Custom without Truth is only antiquated error," and that what we -believe must be established by reason, not prescribed by tradition. - -And it cannot be laid down too clearly that the old view of -Inspiration--which defined it as consisting in verbal dictation, which -made the sacred writers "not only the penmen but the pens of the Holy -Spirit," and which spoke of every sentence, word, syllable, and every -letter of Scripture as Divine and infallible--was a dangerous and -absolute falsity, and that any attempt in these days to enforce it as -binding on the intellect and conscience of mankind could only lead to -the utter shipwreck of all sincere and reasonable religion. "Not -needlessly," says the learned author of _Italy and her -Invaders_--himself an able opponent of many modern conclusions on the -subject--"should I wish to shake even that faith which practically -believes that the whole Bible, exactly in its present shape, yes, almost -the English Bible just as we have it, came straight down from heaven. -But we do want to get away from all mere theories as to the way in which -God _might_ have revealed Himself, and to learn as much as we can of the -way in which He _has_ revealed Himself in actual fact, and in real human -lives."[916] - -To do this has been one of my objects in this volume, and in the -preceding volume on the First Book of Kings. - -2. We have now only to cast one last glance on this book, and on the -lessons which it is meant to teach. - -Consider, first, its deep and varied interest. It has the combined -value of History and of Biography; and, in dealing with both, its aim -is to pass over all minor and earthly details, and to show the method -of God's dealings both with nations and with the individual soul. - -If we look at the book only as a History, it shows us in the briefest -possible compass a series of national events of the greatest -importance in the annals of mankind. We become witnesses of the fierce -occasional struggles between Israel and Judah, and of the constant -warfare of both with those wild surrounding nations--the people of -Moab, and of Edom, Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek, the Philistines also, -and them that dwell at Tyre. We watch the indomitable resistance of -Tyre to Assyria and Babylon. We see the Northern Kingdom of Israel -rise into wealth, power, and luxury, only to sink into deep moral -corruption, until, at last, the patience of God is exhausted, and He -obliterates its very existence in an apparently final and irremediable -overthrow. We witness the rise, culmination, and fall of Syria; the -culmination and the crashing overthrow of Nineveh; the rise and the -splendour of Babylon. We see the surging tide of the nomad Scythians -and Cimmerians rise into flood and ebb away with spent and shallow -waves. We see the petty fortress of Zion triumph in its defiance of -the mighty hosts of Sennacherib because it is strong in reliance upon -God, and we see it grow faithless to God until it succumbs to the -captains of Nebuchadrezzar. Again and again we observe that the -Almighty stills the raging of the sea, the noise of his waves, and the -madness of the people. - -The conviction is borne upon our soul with overwhelming power, as we -read the pages of Amos, of Isaiah, and of Jeremiah, that, in spite of -all their rage and tumult, and apparently irresistible dominance, God -still sitteth above the water-floods, and God remaineth a King for ever. - -Side by side with this spectacle of the dealing of God with nations, in -which we see written in large letters, in characters of blood and of -fire, His dealing with guilty nations, we have abundantly in these -chapters the narrower yet more intense interest which arises from the -contemplation of human nature--one and the same in its general elements, -but infinitely varied in its conditions--in the lives of individual men. -It is revealed to us as in a picture--it is brought home to us, not by -didactic inferences, but with the silent conviction which springs from -the evidence of facts--that wealth is nothing, and rank nothing, and -power nothing, but that the only thing of essential importance in human -lives is whether a man does that which is good or that which is evil in -the sight of the Lord. Good and bad kings pass before us; and though the -best kings, like Hezekiah and Josiah, were no more free from earthly -misfortune than are any of the saints of God--though Hezekiah had to -suffer anguish and humiliation, and Josiah died in defeat on the -battle-field,--yet we are irresistibly led to the belief: "Say ye of the -righteous that it shall be well with him; for they shall eat the fruit -of their doings. Woe unto the wicked! It shall be ill with him; for the -work of his hands shall be done to him." - -We all have a guide in life. "We are not left to steer our course even -by the stars, which the clouds of earth may dim. The ship has something -on board which points towards the spiritual pole of the universe. I will -not venture to call it an _infallible_ guide. It wavers with tremulous -sensitiveness; it may be deflected by disturbing influences; but still -in the main it points with mysterious fidelity towards the pole of our -spirits, even God. And what is this compass which we have for our -guidance? Some would call it Conscience; but we call it by a holier -name, and say that even as the needle is acted on by the magnetic -current, so our spiritual compass is the spirit of man acted on by the -Spirit of the living and infinite God." The lesson of this book--of -every book of biography or of history--is that men are noble and useful -in proportion as they are true to that law of an enlightened conscience -which represents to them the will and the voice of God. - -Ahaziah and Jehoram of Judah, tainted with the blood of Jezebel, and -perverted by the example of Ahab, live wretchedly, reign contemptibly, -and perish miserably; while good Jehoshaphat and pious Josiah are -richly blessed. In the vaunting elation of Amaziah, in the -blood-stained ferocity of Jehu, in the ruthless examples of usurpation -and murder set by king after king in Israel, and in the consequences -which befell them, we see that "fruit is seed." Shallum, Menahem, -Pekah, Athaliah, have to pay a terrible price for brief spells of -troubled royalty; and the slow corruption and disintegration of the -people reflects the vile example of their rulers. Like king, like -people; like people, like priest. We look on at a succession of -thrilling scenes--the horrors of beleaguered cities, the raptures of -unexpected deliverance, the insulting vanities of triumph; we hear the -wail that rises from long lines of fettered captives as they turn -their backs weeping upon their native land. And we are told "strange -stories of the deaths of kings." We see the King of Moab sacrificing -his eldest son to Chemosh upon the wall of Kir-Haraseth in the sight -of three invading hosts. We shudder to think of Ahaz and Manasseh -passing their children through the fire before the grim bull-headed -monster in the valley of the children of Hinnom. We see the two -ghastly piles of the heads of young princes on either side the gates -of Jezreel. We see Jehu driving his fierce chariot over the body of -the painted Tyrian Queen. We catch a glimpse of the sackcloth under -the purple of the King of Israel as he rends his clothes at the -horrible cry of mothers who have devoured their babes. We see the -child Joash standing with the high priest in the Temple amid the blast -of trumpets, while the alien murderess is pushed out and hewn to the -ground. We see Manasseh dragged with hooks to Babylon. We watch the -haggard face of the miserable Zedekiah as his sons are slaughtered -before the eyes which thenceforth are blinded for evermore. We burn -with indignation to see the villain Ishmael close with corpses the -well of Mizpah. But even when the phantasmagoria seems most appalling -and most bloody, we watch the Day-star from on high begin to shed its -glory over the grey east. In due time that Day-star was to rise in -men's hearts and on the world, with healing in His wings; and we feel -that somehow, beyond the smoke and stir of earth's anguish, - - "God's in His heaven, - All's right with the world." - -And like a Greek chorus amid the agonies of destiny stand the -prophets, those clearest and greatest of moral teachers. They, in -spite of their holiness and faithfulness, are not exempt from the -calamities of life. Amos was insulted and expelled by the high priest -of Bethel; Urijah was martyred; Hosea's prophecy is one long and -almost unbroken wail; Isaiah was mocked and slandered by the priests -of Jerusalem, and, if the tradition be true, sawn asunder; Micah, -though spared, prophesied under imminent peril; Jeremiah, saddest of -mankind, type of the suffering servant of Jehovah, was smitten in the -face by the priest Pashur, thrust into the stocks for the general -derision, flung into a deathful prison, let down into a miry well, -hurried into exile, defied, denounced, insulted, at last in all -probability martyred. Prophets in general were hated and disbelieved. -They were the eternal antagonists of priests and mobs. With priests -they had so little affinity, that when a prophet was born a priest, -like Jeremiah and Ezekiel, he might count on the undying hatred and -antagonism of his order. Priests, with scarcely an exception, under -every erring or apostatising king, from Rehoboam to Ahaz, from Ahaz to -Zedekiah, with a monotony of meanness, did nothing but acquiesce, -careful mainly for their own rights and revenues; prophets did little -but raise, against them and their party, an unavailing protest. When, -in the days of the priest-regent Jehoiada, the priests had power, he -had made a special ordinance that there should be overseers in the -Temple whose function it should be to put in the stocks and the collar -"every man that is mad, and that maketh himself a prophet";[917] and -Shemaiah was quite indignant that there should be any delay in putting -this convenient ordinance into force. Priests were chiefly absorbed in -functions and futilities in the exact spirit of their guilty -successors in the days of Christ. There could be little sympathy -between them and the inspired messengers who spoke of such reliance on -observances with almost passionate scorn, and to whom religion meant -righteousness towards men and faith in the Living God. - -This high lesson of Prophecy came into greater prominence with each -succeeding generation. It had been taught by Amos, the first of the -literary prophets, with emphatic distinctness. It was summarised by -Hosea in words which our Saviour loved to quote: "Go ye and learn what -that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice." It had been -uttered by Micah in an outburst of splendid poetry which summed up all -that God requires. It was reiterated in many forms by Isaiah and by -Jeremiah in words of richer moral value than all that came from the -teaching of the priestly functionaries from the days when Aaron -seduced Israel with his golden calf till the days when Caiaphas and -Annas goaded the multitude to prefer Barabbas to Jesus, and to shout -of their Messiah, "Let Him be crucified." - -It was the richest fruit which sprang from the long Divine discipline of -the nation,--the knowledge that outward things are of no avail to save -any man; that God requires righteousness, that God looketh at the heart. - -And the prophets themselves had to learn by the irony of events that -no suppression of local sanctuaries under Hezekiah, no multiplication -of ceremonies and acceptance of Deuteronomic Codes under Josiah, were -deep enough to change men's hearts. Isaiah, like Amos, dwells with -anger on the reliance upon vain ritual, which is so cheap a substitute -for genuine holiness; and Jeremiah, despairing utterly of that -reformation under Josiah of which he had once felt hopeful, had to -denounce the new reliance on the Temple and its sacrifices. He -ultimately felt no confidence in anything except in a new covenant in -which God Himself would write His law upon men's hearts, and all -should know Him from the least even to the greatest. - -But the History of Prophecy also in this epoch is marked by events of -world-wide importance. In the days of Isaiah we see the change of -Israel from a nation into a church of the faithful, for which alone he -has any permanent hope. In him, too, we hear the first distinct -utterances of the final form in which should be fulfilled the -Messianic hope. Under Jeremiah there was still further advance. He -points, as Joel does, to the epoch of the gift of the Holy Spirit, and -shows that God does not only deal with men as nations, or as churches, -or even as families, but as beings with individual souls. - -This and much besides we have seen in the foregoing pages, in which we -have endeavoured to point the lessons of the Books of Kings. The one -main lesson which the narrative is meant to teach is absolute faith -and trust in God, as an anchor which holds amid the wildest storms of -ruin, and of apparently final failure. Not until we have realised that -truth can we hear the words of God, or see the vision of the Almighty. -When we have learnt it, we shall not fear, though the hills be moved -and carried into the midst of the sea. It is the lesson which gets -behind the meaning of failure, and raises us to a height from which we -can look down on prosperity as a thing which--except in fatally -delusive semblance--cannot exist apart from righteousness and faith. -This is the lesson of life, the lesson of lessons. If it does not -solve all problems on their intellectual side, it scatters all -perplexities in the spiritual sphere. It shows us that duty is the -reward of duty, and that there can be no happiness save for those who -have learnt that duty and blessedness are one. And thus even by this -book of annals--annals of wild deeds and troubled times--we may be -taught the truths which find their perfect illustration and proof in -the life and teaching of the Son of God. When those truths are our -real possession, the work of life is done. Then - - "Vigour may fail the towering fantasy, - But yet the Will rolls onward, like a wheel - In even motion by the love impelled - That moves the sun in heaven and all the stars." - -FOOTNOTES: - -[916] T. Hodgkin, _Friends' Quarterly_, September 1893, p. 401. - -[917] Jer. xxix. 25-27. - - - - - APPENDIX I - - _THE KINGS OF ASSYRIA, AND SOME OF THEIR - INSCRIPTIONS._ - - -Dates from the _Eponym Canon_ and the Assyrian Monuments; Schrader, -_Cuneiform Inscriptions, and the Old Testament_, E. Tr., 1888, pp. -167-187. - - B.C. - - 860.--Shalmaneser II. - - 854.--Battle of Karkar. War with _Ahab_ and _Benhadad_. - - 842.--War with Hazael. Tribute of _Jehu_. - - 825.--Samsi-Ramman.[918] - - 812.--Ramman-Nirari. - - 783.--Shalmaneser III. - - 773.--Assur-dan III. - - 763.--June 15th. Eclipse of the sun. - - 755.--Assur-Nirari. - - 745.--Tiglath-Pileser II. - - 742.--Azariah (Uzziah) heads a league of nineteen Hamathite - districts against Assyria (?). - - 740.--Death of Uzziah (?). - - 738.--Tribute of Menahem, Rezin, and Hiram. - - 734.--Expedition to Palestine against Pekah. Tribute of Ahaz. - - 732.--Capture of Damascus. Death of Rezin. First actual - collision between Israel and Assyria. - - 728.--Hoshea refuses tribute. - - 727.--Shalmaneser IV. - - 724.--Siege of Samaria begun. - - 722.--Sargon. Fall of Samaria. - - 721.--Defeat of Merodach-Baladan. - - 720.--Battle of Raphia. Defeat of Sabaco, King of Egypt. - - 715.--Subjugated people deported to Samaria. Accession of - Hezekiah. - - 711.--Capture of Ashdod. - - 707.--Building of great palace of Dur-Sarrukin. - - 709.--Sargon expels Merodach-Baladan, and becomes King of - Babylon. - - 705.--Assassination (?) of Sargon. - - 705.--Sennacherib. - - 704.--Embassy of Merodach-Baladan to Hezekiah. - - 703.--Belibus made King of Babylon. - - 702.--Construction of the Bellino Cylinder. - - 721.--Siege of Ekron. Defeat of Egypt at Altaqu. Siege of - Jerusalem. Campaign against Hezekiah and Tirhakah - disastrously concluded at Pelusium and Jerusalem. - - 681.--Murder of Sennacherib. - - 681.--Esar-haddon. - - 676.--Manasseh pays tribute. - - 668.--Assur-bani-pal (Sardanapalus). - - 608.--Death of Josiah in the battle of Megiddo against Pharaoh - Necho. - -The dates and names of Assyrian kings as given in _Records of the -Past_ (ii. 207, 208) do not exactly accord with these in all cases. - - B.C. - - Tiglath-Pileser II. 950 - Assur-dan II. 930 - Rimmon-Nirari II. 911 - Tiglath-Uras II. 889 - Assur-natzu-pal 883 - Shalmaneser II. 858 - Assur-dain-pal (a rebel) 825 - Samsi-Rimmon II. 823 - Rimmon-Nirari III. 810 - Shalmaneser III. 781 - Assur-dan III. 771 - Assur-Nirari 753 - Tiglath-Pileser III. (Pul) 745 - Shalmaneser IV. (an usurper) 727 - Sargon (Jareb?) (usurper) 722 - Sennacherib 705 - Esar-haddon I. 681 - Assur-bani-pal 668 - * * * * * * - Destruction of Nineveh under Esar-haddon - II., or Sarakos 606 - - - INSCRIPTION OF SHALMANESER II. ON THE BLACK OBELISK - IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM[919] - -It begins with an invocation to the gods Rimmon, Adar, Merodach, -Nergal, Beltis, Istar, and proceeds:-- - -"I am Shalmaneser, the strong king, king of all the four Zones of the -Sun, the marcher over the whole world, ... who has laid his yoke upon -all lands hostile to him, and has swept them like a whirlwind." - -It tells of his campaigns against the Hittites etc., etc. - -The allusion to Jehu runs as follows:-- - -"The tribute of Yahua, son of Khumri, silver, gold, bowls of gold, -vessels of gold, goblets of gold, pitchers of gold, lead, sceptres for -the king's hand, staves, I received." - -This inscription is supplemented by another on a monolith found at -Karkh, twenty miles from Diarbekr (_Records_, iii 81-100), which -mentions the battle of Karkar, with its slaughter of fourteen thousand -of the enemy, among whom was Sirlai--_i.e._, Ahab of Israel. - - - II - - TIGLATH-PILESER II. (CIRC. B.C. 739) - -In his Records he mentions no less than five Hebrew kings--Azariah, -Jehoahaz (Ahaz), Menahem, Pekah, Hoshea--as well as Rezin of Damascus, -Hiram of Tyre, etc. His name perhaps means "He who puts his trust in -Adar." See _Records of the_ _Past_, v. 45-52; Schrader, _Keilinschr._, -pp. 149-151; G. Smith, _Assyrian Discoveries_, pp. 254-287. - -Unfortunately the inscriptions are very mutilated and fragmentary. - - - III - -Our chief knowledge of SARGON is from the great inscription in the -Palace of Khorsabad. It is translated by Prof. Dr. Jules Oppert, -_Records of the Past_, ix. 1-21. The king's inscription at Bavian, -north-east of Mosul, is in the same volume, pp. 21-28, translated by -Dr. T. G. Pinches. See, too, _id._, vii. 21-56, xi. 15-40. - -The Khorsabad inscription has these passages:-- - -"The great gods have made me happy by the constancy of their affection; -they have granted me the exercise of my sovereignty over all kings." - -He says:-- - -"I besieged and occupied the town of Samaria; I took twenty-seven -thousand two hundred and eighty of its inhabitants captive. I took -from them fifty chariots, but left them the rest of their belongings. -I placed my lieutenants over them; I renewed the obligations imposed -upon them _by one of the kings who preceded me_." [Tiglath-Pileser, -whom Sargon does not choose to name.] - -"Hanun, King of Gaza, and Sabaco, Sultan of Egypt, allied themselves -at _Raphia_ to oppose me. I put them to flight. Sabaco fled, and no -one has seen any trace of him since. I imposed a tribute on Pharaoh, -King of Egypt." - -He tells us that he defeated the usurper Ilubid of Hamath, who had -been a smith; burnt Karkar; and flayed Ilubid alive. - -He defeated Azuri and Jaman of Ashdod, and his most persistent enemy, -Merodach-Baladan, son of Jakin, King of Chalda. - -He ends with a prayer that Assur may bless him. - - - IV - -Bellino's Cylinder comprises the first two years of SENNACHERIB. It is -translated by Mr. H. F. Talbot, _Records of the Past_, i. 22-32. It -was published by Layard in the first volume of _British Museum -Inscriptions_, pl. 63. The facsimile of it was made by Bellino. - -It begins:-- - -"SENNACHERIB, the great king, the powerful king, the king of Assyria, -the king unrivalled, the pious monarch, the worshipper of the great -gods, ... the noble warrior, the valiant hero, the first of all kings, -the great punisher of unbelievers who are breakers of the holy -festivals. - -"Assur, my lord, has given me an unrivalled monarchy. Over all princes -he has raised triumphantly my arms. - -"In the beginning of my reign I defeated Marduk-Baladan, King of -Babylon, and his allies the Elamites, in the plains near the city of -Kish. He fled alone; he got into the marshes full of reeds and rushes, -and so saved his life." - -(He proceeds to narrate the spoiling of Marduk's camp, and his palace -in Babylon, and how he carried off his wife, his harem, his nobles.) - -We see here an illustration of the vaunting tones of this king which -are so faithfully reproduced in 2 Kings xviii. - -His Bull Inscription, chiefly relating to his defeats of -Merodach-Baladan, is translated by Rev. J. M. Rodwell (_Records of the -Past_, vii. 57-64). - - - V - -The Taylor Cylinder, so called from its former possessor, is a hexagonal -clay prism found at Nineveh in 1830, and now in the British Museum -(translated by Mr. H. F. Talbot, _Records of the Past_, i. 33-53). - -The first two campaigns of Sennacherib are related as on the Bellino -Cylinder. The Taylor Cylinder narrates campaigns of his first eight -years. - -The story of the third campaign narrates the defeat of Elulus, King -of Sidon; the tribute of Menahem, King of Samaria; the defeat of -Zidka, King of Askelon; the revolt of Ekron, which deposed the -Assyrian vassal Padi, and sent him in iron chains to Hezekiah; the -battle of Egypt and Ethiopia at Altaqu (Eltekon, Josh. xv. 59), and -the capture of Timnath. Of Hezekiah the king says:-- - -"And Hezekiah, King of Judah, who had not bowed down at my feet, -forty-six of his strong cities, castles, and smaller towns, with -warlike engines, I captured; 200,500 people, small and great, male and -female, horses, sheep, etc., without number, I carried off. Himself I -shut up like a bird in a cage inside Jerusalem. Siege-towers against -him I constructed. I gave his plundered cities to the kings of Ashdod, -Ekron, and Gaza. I diminished his kingdom; I augmented his tribute. -The fearful splendour of my majesty had overwhelmed him. The -horsemen, soldiers, etc., which he had collected for the fortification -of Jerusalem his royal city, now carried tribute, thirty talents of -gold, eight hundred of silver, scarlet, embroidered woven cloth, large -precious stones, ivory couches and thrones, skins, precious woods; his -daughters, his harem, his male and female slaves, unto Nineveh, my -royal city, after me he sent; and to pay tribute he sent his envoy." - -He then narrates his fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh campaigns -against Elam, etc. His eighth was against "the children of Babylon, -wicked devils," etc. He ends by describing the splendour of the palace -which he built. - - - VI - -An inscription of ESAR-HADDON, found at Kouyunjik, now in the British -Museum, mentions his receipt of the intelligence of his father's -murder by his unnatural brothers, while he was commanding his fathers -army on the northern confines. - -"From my heart I made a vow. My liver was inflamed with rage. -Immediately I wrote letters, saying I assumed the sovereignty of my -Father's House." He prayed to the gods and goddesses; they encouraged -him, and in spite of a great snowstorm he reached Nineveh, and defeated -his brother, because Istar stood by his side and said to their army, "An -unsparing deity am I" (_Records of the Past_, iii, 100-108). - - - VII - -A terra-cotta cylinder of ASSUR-BANI-PAL (the Sardanapalus of the -Greeks) is now in the British Museum. It is translated by Mr. G. -Smith, _Records of the Past_, i. 55-106, ix. 37-64; Oppert, _Mmoire -sur les Rapports de l'Egypte et l'Assyrie_; and G. Smith, _Annals of -Assur-bani-pal_. - -Its most interesting parts relate to the campaign of his father -Esar-haddon against Egypt, and how Tirhakah, King of Egypt and -Ethiopia, reoccupied Memphis. He defeated the army of Tirhakah, who, -to save his life, fled from Memphis to Thebes. The Assyrians then took -Thebes, and restored Necho's father, Psamatik I., to Memphis and Sais, -and other Egyptian kings, friends of Assyria, who had fled before -Tirhakah. The kings, however, proved ungrateful, and made a league -against him. He therefore threw them into fetters, and had them -brought to Nineveh, but subsequently released Necho with splendid -presents. Tirhakah fled to Ethiopia, where he "went to his place of -night"--_i.e._, died. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[918] Up to the time of Tiglath-Pileser II., the Eponym Year (which is -not here given) marks the second complete year of each king's reign. - -[919] This Shalmaneser died about B.C. 825, after a reign of -thirty-five years (Sayce in _Records of the Past_, v. 27-42; Oppert, -_Hist. des Empires de Chalde et d'Assyrie_; Mnant, _Annales des Rois -d'Assyrie_, 1874). - - - - - APPENDIX II - - _INSCRIPTION IN THE TUNNEL OF SILOAM_ - - -The inscription of Siloam is the oldest known Hebrew inscription. "It is -engraved on the rocky wall of the subterranean channel which conveys the -water of the Virgin's Spring at Jerusalem into the Pool of Siloam. In -the summer of 1880 one of the native pupils of Dr. Schick, a German -architect, was playing with other lads in the Pool, and while wading up -the subterranean channel slipped and fell into the water. On rising to -the surface he noticed, in spite of the darkness, what looked like -letters on the rock which formed the southern wall of the channel. Dr. -Schick visited the spot, and found that an ancient inscription, -concealed for the most part by the water, actually existed there." The -level of the water was lowered, but the inscription had been partly -filled up with a deposit of lime, and the first intelligible copy was -made by Professor Sayce in February 1881, and six weeks later by Dr. -Guthe. Professor Sayce had to sit for hours in the mud and water, -working under masonry or earth. There can be little doubt that this work -is alluded to in 2 Kings xx. 20; 2 Chron. xxxii. 30; Isa. viii. 6 ("the -waters of Shiloah ["the tunnel"?] which flow softly"). - -The alphabet is that used by the prophets before the exile, somewhat -like that on the Moabite Stone, and on early Israelitish and Jewish -seals. The language is pure Hebrew, with only one unknown -word--_zadah_, in line three: perhaps "excess" or "obstacle." - -Professor Sayce thinks that it proves that "the City of David" (Zion) -must have been on the southern hill, the so-called Ophel. If so, the -Valley of the Sons of Hinnom must be the rubbish-choked Tyropoeon, -under which must be the tombs of the kings, and the relics of the -Temple and Palace destroyed by Nebuchadrezzar. - -The inscription is:-- - -"The excavation! Now this is the history of the excavation. While the -excavators were lifting up the pick each towards his neighbour, and -while there were yet three cubits [to excavate], there was heard the -voice of one man calling to his neighbour, for there was an excess in -the rock on the right hand [and on the left?]. And after that on the -day of excavating, the excavators had struck pick against pick, one -against another, the water flowed from the spring [_mts_, "exit," 2 -Chron. xxxii. 30] to the Pool" (that of Siloam, which therefore was -the only one which then existed) "for twelve hundred cubits. And -[part] of a cubit was the height of the rock over the head of the -excavators" (Sayce, _Records of the Past_, i. 169-175). - -The letters are on an artificial tablet cut in the wall of rock, -nineteen feet from where the subterranean conduit opens on the Pool of -Siloam, and on the right-hand side. The conduit is at first sixteen -feet high, but lessens in one place to no more than two feet. It is, -according to Captain Conder, seventeen hundred and eight yards long, -but not in a straight line, as there are two _culs-de-sac_, caused by -faulty engineering. The engineers, beginning, as at Mount Cenis, from -opposite ends, intended to meet in the middle, but failed. The floor -has been rounded to allow the water to flow more easily. It is a -splendid piece of engineering for that age. - -The Pool of Siloam is at the south-east end of a hill which lies to -the south of the Temple hill: the Virgin's Fountain is on the opposite -side of the hill, more to the north, and is the only natural spring or -"Gihon" near Jerusalem, so that its water was of supreme importance. -Being outside the city wall, a conduit was necessary. Hezekiah -"stopped all the fountains" (2 Chron. xxxii. 4)--_i.e._, concealed -them. By providing a subterranean channel for them, he saved them from -the enemy and secured the water-supply of the besieged city. - - - - - APPENDIX III - - _WAS THERE A GOLDEN CALF AT DAN?_ - - -The question might seem absurd, but for its solution I must refer to -my paper on the subject in the _Expositor_ for October 1893. - -The _sole_ authorities for a calf at Dan are 1 Kings xii. 28-30; 2 Kings -x. 29. If in the former passage we alter _one letter_, and read [Hebrew: -hfd] (the "ephod") for [Hebrew: hchd] (the "one")--as Klostermann -suggests--we throw light on an obscure and perhaps corrupt passage. The -allusion then would be to Micah's old idolatrous image (which _may_ have -been a calf) at Dan. The two words "and in Dan" in 2 Kings x. 29 may -easily have been (as Klostermann thinks) an exegetical gloss added from -the error of one letter in 1 Kings xii. 30. - -Dan was a most unlikely place to select: for (1) It was a remote -frontier town; and (2) there was no room, and no necessity there, for -a new cultus beside the ancient one established some centuries -earlier, and still served by priests who were direct lineal -descendants of Moses (Judg. xviii. 30, 31). - -This would further account for the absolute silence of prophets and -historians about any golden calf at Dan; and it adds to the inherent -probability, also supported by some evidence, that there were _two_ -cherubic calves at Bethel. - -For further arguments I must refer to my paper. - - - - - APPENDIX IV - - _DATES OF THE KINGS OF ISRAEL AND JUDAH, AS - GIVEN BY KITTEL AND OTHER MODERN CRITICS[920]_ - - - ISRAEL - - B.C. - - Ahaziah 855-854 - Jehoram 854-842 - Jehu 842-814 - Jehoahaz 814-797 - Joash 797-781 - Jeroboam II. 781-740 - Zachariah 740 - Shallum 740 - Menahem 740-737 - Pekahiah 737-735 - Pekah 735-734 - Hoshea 734-725 - - - JUDAH - - B.C. - - Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat 851-843 - Ahaziah ben-Jehoram 843-842 - Athaliah 842-836 - Joash ben-Ahaziah 836-796 - Amaziah 796-783 - Amaziah-Uzziah 783-737 - Jotham 737-735 - Ahaz 735-715 - Hezekiah 715-686 - - Manasseh 686-641 - Amon 641-639 - Josiah 639-608 - Jehoahaz 608 - Jehoiakim 608-597 - Jehoiachin 597 - Zedekiah 597-586 - -FOOTNOTE: - -[920] Many of these dates can only be regarded as uncertain and -approximate. Kamphausen dates the commencement of all the latter kings -a year later (_Die Chronologie der hebrischen Knige_, Bonn, 1883). - - - - -Transcriber's Notes: - - -Obvious punctuation and spelling errors have been fixed throughout. - -Non-Latin characters have been replaced with the nearest Latin -equivalent for example oe (the oe ligature), was replaced with oe. - -Inconsistent hyphenation left as in the original text. - -Missing footnote anchors have been placed, when possible to determine -placement. - -Footnote 198: Greek has been corrected to add accents. - -Footnote 215: Greek has been corrected. - - - - - - -End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Expositor's Bible, by F. W. Farrar - -*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE *** - -***** This file should be named 42027-8.txt or 42027-8.zip ***** -This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: - http://www.gutenberg.org/4/2/0/2/42027/ - -Produced by Douglas L. Alley, III, Colin Bell and the -Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net -(This file was produced from images generously made -available by The Internet Archive) - - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions -will be renamed. - -Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no -one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation -(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without -permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, -set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to -copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to -protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project -Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you -charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you -do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the -rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose -such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and -research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do -practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is -subject to the trademark license, especially commercial -redistribution. - - - -*** START: FULL LICENSE *** - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project -Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at - www.gutenberg.org/license. - - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy -all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. -If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the -terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or -entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement -and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" -or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the -collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an -individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are -located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from -copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative -works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg -are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project -Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by -freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of -this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with -the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by -keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project -Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in -a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check -the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement -before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or -creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project -Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning -the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United -States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate -access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently -whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, -copied or distributed: - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived -from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is -posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied -and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees -or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work -with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the -work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 -through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the -Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or -1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional -terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked -to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the -permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any -word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or -distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than -"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version -posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), -you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a -copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon -request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other -form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided -that - -- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is - owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he - has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the - Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments - must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you - prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax - returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and - sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the - address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to - the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." - -- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or - destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium - and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of - Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any - money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days - of receipt of the work. - -- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set -forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from -both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael -Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the -Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm -collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain -"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or -corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual -property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a -computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by -your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with -your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with -the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a -refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity -providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to -receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy -is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further -opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER -WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO -WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. -If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the -law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be -interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by -the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any -provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance -with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, -promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, -harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, -that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do -or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm -work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any -Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. - - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers -including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists -because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from -people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. -To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 -and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org - - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive -Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent -permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. -Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered -throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 -North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email -contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the -Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -For additional contact information: - Dr. Gregory B. Newby - Chief Executive and Director - gbnewby@pglaf.org - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To -SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any -particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. -To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm -concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared -with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project -Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. -unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily -keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. - -Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: - - www.gutenberg.org - -This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/old/42027-8.zip b/old/42027-8.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 4db4ccb..0000000 --- a/old/42027-8.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/42027-h.zip b/old/42027-h.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 860d94a..0000000 --- a/old/42027-h.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/42027-h/42027-h.htm b/old/42027-h/42027-h.htm deleted file mode 100644 index 8719ac0..0000000 --- a/old/42027-h/42027-h.htm +++ /dev/null @@ -1,22772 +0,0 @@ -<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" - "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"> - -<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> - <head> - <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=iso-8859-1" /> - <meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" /> - <title> - The Expositor's Bible: The Second Book of Kings, by F. W. Farrar--A Project Gutenberg eBook. - </title> - <style type="text/css"> - -body { - margin-left: 10%; - margin-right: 10%; -} - - h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 { - text-align: center; /* all headings centered */ - clear: both; -} - -p { - margin-top: .75em; - text-align: justify; - margin-bottom: .75em; -} - -hr { - margin: 3em auto 3em auto; - height: 0px; - border-width: 1px 0 0 0; - border-style: solid; - border-color: #dcdcdc; - width: 500px; - clear: both; -} - -hr.hr2 { - width: 250px; - margin: 3em auto 3em auto; -} - -table.toc { - margin: auto; - width: 90%; - border-collapse:collapse; -} - -table.middle { - margin:auto; -} - -td.c2 { - text-align: left; - margin-left: 0em; - padding-left: 2em; - text-indent: -2em; - padding-right: 1em; - vertical-align: middle; -} - -td.c3 { - text-align: right; - padding-left: 1em; - vertical-align: bottom; -} - -td { padding: 0em 1em; } -th { padding: 0em 1em; } - - .pagenum { /* uncomment the next line for invisible page numbers */ - /* visibility: hidden; */ - position: absolute; - left: 92%; - font-size: smaller; - text-align: right; - color: #999; -} /* page numbers */ - - .center {text-align: center;} - - .smcap {font-variant: small-caps;} - -/* Images */ - .figright { - clear: right; - float: right; - margin: 0em 0em 0em 1em; - padding: 0; - text-align: left; - width: auto; -} -/* Transcriber Notes */ -div.tn { - background-color: #EEE; - border: dashed 1px; - color: #000; - margin-left: 10%; - margin-right: 10%; - margin-top: 5em; - margin-bottom: 5em; - padding: 1em; -} - -ul.corrections { - list-style-type: circle; -} - -/* Footnotes */ -div.fn { - background-color: #EEE; - border: dashed 1px; - color: #000; - margin-left: 10%; - margin-right: 10%; - margin-top: 5em; - margin-bottom: 5em; - padding: 1em; -} - - .footnote { - margin-left: 10%; - margin-right: 10%; - font-size: 0.9em; -} - - .footnote .label { - position: absolute; - right: 84%; - text-align: right; -} - - .fnanchor { - vertical-align: super; - font-size: .8em; - text-decoration: none; -} - -/* Poetry */ - .poem { - margin-left: 10%; - margin-right: 10%; - text-align: left; -} - - .poem br { display: none; } - - .poem .stanza { margin: 1em 0em 1em 0em; } - - .signature { - text-align: right; - margin-right: 5%; -} - - .signature2 { - text-align: right; - margin-right: 15%; -} - -li.pad { padding-top: 2.0%; } - .poem span.i0 {display: block; margin-left: 0em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i1 {display: block; margin-left: 0.5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i16 {display: block; margin-left: 8em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i20 {display: block; margin-left: 10em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i24 {display: block; margin-left: 12em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i26 {display: block; margin-left: 13em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i3 {display: block; margin-left: 1.5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i30 {display: block; margin-left: 15em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i31 {display: block; margin-left: 15.5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i32 {display: block; margin-left: 16em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i35 {display: block; margin-left: 17.5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i38 {display: block; margin-left: 19em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i4 {display: block; margin-left: 2em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i40 {display: block; margin-left: 20em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i42 {display: block; margin-left: 21em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i46 {display: block; margin-left: 23em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i5 {display: block; margin-left: 2.5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i6 {display: block; margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i7 {display: block; margin-left: 3.5em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - .poem span.i8 {display: block; margin-left: 4em; padding-left: 3em; text-indent: -3em;} - - </style> - </head> -<body> - - -<pre> - -The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Expositor's Bible, by F. W. Farrar - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - - -Title: The Expositor's Bible - The Second Book of Kings - -Author: F. W. Farrar - -Editor: W. Robertson Nicoll - -Release Date: February 5, 2013 [EBook #42027] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 - -*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE *** - - - - -Produced by Douglas L. Alley, III, Colin Bell and the -Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net -(This file was produced from images generously made -available by The Internet Archive) - - - - - - -</pre> - - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_i" id="Page_i">[Pg i]</a></span></p> - - -<h3>The</h3> - -<h1>Expositor's Bible<br /><br /></h1> - - -<h5>Edited by</h5> -<h3>W. Robertson Nicoll, D.D., LL.D.<br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /></h3> - - - - - - - - -<div class="figright" > - <a name="illus001.png" id="illus001.png"></a> - <img src="images/001.png" alt="Publisher's Mark" title="Publisher's Mark" /> -</div> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_ii" id="Page_ii">[Pg ii]</a></span></p> - - - -<h1>THE EXPOSITORS' BIBLE</h1> - -<h4><i>Edited by</i> W. ROBERTSON NICOLL, D.D., LL.D.</h4> - -<h4><i>New and Cheaper Edition. Printed from original plates -Complete in every detail. Uniform with this volume</i></h4> - -<h4>Price 50 cents per volume. (If by mail add 10 cents postage)</h4> - - -<h4>OLD TESTAMENT VOLUMES</h4> - -<p> -<span class="smcap">Genesis.</span> By Rev. Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Exodus.</span> By Very Rev. G. A. Chadwick, D.D., Dean of Armagh.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Leviticus.</span> By Rev. S. H. Kellogg, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Numbers.</span> By Rev. R. A. Watson, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Deuteronomy.</span> By Rev. Prof. Andrew Harper, B.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Joshua.</span> By Rev. Prof. W. G. Blaikie, D.D., LL.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Judges and Ruth.</span> By Rev. R. A. Watson, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">First Samuel.</span> By Rev. Prof. W. G. Blaikie, D.D., LL.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Second Samuel.</span> By same author.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">First Kings.</span> By F. W. Farrar, D.D., Dean of Canterbury.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Second Kings.</span> By same author.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">First and Second Chronicles.</span> By Rev. Prof. W. H. Bennett.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Ezra, Nehemiah, and Esther.</span> By Rev. Prof. W. F. Adeney.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Job.</span> By Rev. R. A. Watson, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Psalms.</span> In 3 vols. Vol. I., Chapters I.-XXXVIII.; Vol. II., Chapters -XXXIX.-LXXXIX.; Vol. III., Chapters XC.-CL. By Rev. -Alexander Maclaren, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Proverbs.</span> By Rev. R. F. Horton, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Ecclesiastes.</span> By Rev. Samuel Cox, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Song of Solomon</span> and <span class="smcap">Lamentations.</span> By Rev. Prof. W. F. Adeney.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Isaiah.</span> In 2 vols. Vol. I., Chapters I.-XXXIX.; Vol. II., Chapters XL.-LXVI. -By Prof. George Adam Smith, D.D., LL.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Jeremiah.</span> Chapters I.-XX. With a Sketch of his Life and Times. By -Rev. C. J. Ball.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Jeremiah.</span> Chapters XXI.-LII. By Rev. Prof. W. H. Bennett.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Ezekiel.</span> By Rev. Prof. John Skinner.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Daniel.</span> By <span class="smcap">F. W. Farrar</span>, D.D., Dean of Canterbury.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">The Twelve</span> (Minor) <span class="smcap">Prophets</span>. In 2 vols. By Rev. George Adam Smith, -D.D., LL.D.<br /> -<br /> -<br /></p> - -<h4>NEW TESTAMENT VOLUMES -<br /></h4> -<p> -<span class="smcap">St. Matthew.</span> By Rev. J. Monro Gibson, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">St. Mark.</span> By Very Rev. G. A. Chadwick, D.D., Dean of Armagh.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">St. Luke.</span> By Rev. Henry Burton.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Gospel of St. John.</span> In 2 vols. Vol. I., Chapters I.-XI.; Vol. II., Chapters -XII.-XXI. By Rev. Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">The Acts of the Apostles.</span> In 2 vols. By Rev. Prof. G. T. Stokes, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Romans.</span> By Rev. Handley C. G. Moule, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">First Corinthians.</span> By Rev. Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Second Corinthians.</span> By Rev. James Denney, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Galatians.</span> By Rev. Prof. G. G. Findlay, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Ephesians.</span> By same author.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Philippians.</span> By Rev. Principal Robert Rainy, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Colossians</span> and <span class="smcap">Philemon</span>. By Rev. Alexander Maclaren, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Thessalonians.</span> By Rev. James Denney, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Pastoral Epistles.</span> By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Hebrews.</span> By Rev. Principal T. C. Edwards, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">St. James</span> and <span class="smcap">St. Jude</span>. By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">St. Peter.</span> By Rev. Prof. J. Rawson Lumby, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Epistles of St. John.</span> By Rt. Rev. W. Alexander, Lord Bishop of Derry.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Revelation.</span> By Prof. W. Milligan, D.D.<br /> -<br /> -<span class="smcap">Index Volume to Entire Series.</span><br /> -</p> - -<h4><i>New York</i>: HODDER & STOUGHTON, <i>Publishers</i></h4> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_iii" id="Page_iii">[Pg iii]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2>THE<br /> -SECOND BOOK OF KINGS<br /><br /><br /><br /></h2> - - - - -<h6>BY</h6> -<h4>F. W. Farrar, D.D., F.R.S.</h4> - -<h6>LATE FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE; ARCHDEACON OF -WESTMINSTER<br /><br /><br /><br /></h6> - - - - - - -<h4>HODDER & STOUGHTON</h4> -<h5>NEW YORK</h5> -<h4>GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY</h4> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_iv" id="Page_iv">[Pg iv]</a><br /><a name="Page_v" id="Page_v">[Pg v]</a></span></p> - - - -<h3>CONTENTS</h3> - -<table class="toc" summary="Contents"> - <tbody> - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER I</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2"> </td> - <td class="c3"><span class="smcap">page</span></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">AHAZIAH BEN-AHAB OF ISRAEL (B.C. 855-854)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_3">3</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>A weak, shadowy, and faithless king—1. Relations between -Judah and Israel—2. Alliance with Jehoshaphat—3. Revolt -of Moab—Mesha and the Moabite Stone—4. The fall from the -lattice—Baal-Zebub—Elijah calling down fire from heaven—How -are we to judge respecting the Elijah-spirit?—Variations -of moral standard.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER II</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE ASCENSION OF ELIJAH</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_19">19</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Uncertain date—The journey to Gilgal; to Bethel; to -Jericho; to the Jordan—The double portion—Chariot and -horses of fire—Elisha recrosses the Jordan—The young -prophets and their search—Grandeur of Elijah.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER III</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">ELISHA</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_25">25</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Cycle of supernatural stories—Elisha and Elijah—The cure -of the unwholesome fountain—"Go up, thou bald-head"—The -children and the bears.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER IV</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE INVASION OF MOAB</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_29">29</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Death of Ahaziah—Jehoram Ben-Ahab of Israel—Good -beginnings—Attempts to recover Moab—Alliance with Judah -and Edom—The invasion—An army perishing of thirst—Elisha—Music—Trenches -in the wdy—Error of the Moabites—Their<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vi" id="Page_vi">[Pg vi]</a></span> -disastrous rout—Devastation of the country—Mesha -propitiates Chemosh—"Great wrath against Israel"—The -invading army retreats.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER V</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">ELISHA'S MIRACLES</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_40">40</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Their chronological vagueness—Difference between Elisha -and Elijah—Contrasts and resemblances—Social life in Israel—1. -The widow and the oil—2. The lady of Shunem—Her -hospitality—Her reward—3. The boy's death—Her distress—The -resuscitation—4. Death in the pot—5. The multiplied -first-fruits.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER VI</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE STORY OF NAAMAN</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_50">50</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>The little maid—The leper—Letter of Benhadad to Jehoram—His -indignation—Elisha's message—Naaman's disappointment -and anger—His servants—His healing—His gratitude—Bowing -in the house of Rimmon—Mean cupidity of Gehazi—Stricken -with leprosy—The axe-head.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER VII</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">ELISHA AND THE SYRIANS</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_66">66</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Syrian marauders—They are baffled—Anger of Benhadad—The -vision at Dothan—Meaning of the promises—How fulfilled -to God's saints on earth—Some are delivered, some are -not—Elisha misleads the Syrians—His generosity to them—Its -effects—A fresh Syrian invasion.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER VIII</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE FAMINE AND THE SIEGE</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_76">76</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Horrible straits of the besieged Samaritans—Stress of -famine—The King of Israel—The miserable women—Sackcloth -under the purple—The king's fury and despair—He -threatens Elisha—The messenger—The king upbraids him—Prophecy -of sudden plenty—The disbelieving lord—The extramural -lepers—The Syrian camp—The king's misgivings—The -lord killed in the rush of the people.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER IX<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_vii" id="Page_vii">[Pg vii]</a></span></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE SHUNAMMITE AND HAZAEL</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_87">87</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>The lady of Shunem leaves her estate—Her return—Gehazi -talks with the king—Entrance of the Shunammite—Her estates -restored—Elisha visits Damascus—A royal present—Benhadad's -illness—Hazael—The dark prophecy—Unexplained -death of Benhadad—Hazael's usurpation—Real meaning of -Elisha's words to Hazael.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER X</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">TWO SONS OF JEHOSHAPHAT</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_99">99</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Jehoram (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 851-843)—Ahaziah (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 843-842)—Jehoram -ben-Jehoshaphat of Judah—Perplexing uncertainty of minute -chronological details—The blight of the Jezebel-alliance—The -husband of Athaliah—His apostasies—Revolt of Edom—Narrow -escape of Jehoram—Revolt of Libnah—Jehoram's -murder by his brethren—Philistine invasion—Incurable disease—Ahaziah -ben-Jehoram—Joins his uncle (Jehoram ben-Ahab) -in the campaign against Ramoth-Gilead—Visits him at Jezreel—Shot -down by Jehu.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XI</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE REVOLT OF JEHU (B.C. 842)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_106">106</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Misery of Jehoram's reign—Thwarted invasion of Moab—Aggression -of Benhadad—At Ramoth-Gilead—The young -prophet—The two kings absent from the camp—The -dangerous commission—The assembled captains—Jehu -secretly anointed—His accession enthusiastically welcomed by -the army—His sudden enthronement—His swift resolution—The -watchman at Jezreel—The two horsemen—The two kings—Their -murder—Ferocity of Jehu—Elijah's prophecy—Jezebel—She -is hurled down—Jehu drives over her body—The curse -fulfilled.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XII</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">JEHU ESTABLISHED ON THE THRONE (B.C. 842-814)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_125">125</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>His politic subtlety—The murder of the seventy princes—The -ghastly heaps—Hypocritic ferocity.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XIII<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_viii" id="Page_viii">[Pg viii]</a></span></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">FRESH MURDERS—THE EXTIRPATION OF BAAL-WORSHIP (B.C. 842)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_131">131</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Wading through blood to a throne—The ride to Samaria—The -brethren of Ahaziah of Judah—The corpse-choked tank -of the shepherds—The Bedawy ascetic—The scene of slaughter -in the temple of Baal—Did Elisha approve of these atrocities?—Prophetic -judgment on Jehu—Ravages of Hazael—Jehu's -anguish—He pays tribute to Assyria.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XIV</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">ATHALIAH (B.C. 842-836)—JOASH OF JUDAH (B.C. 836-796)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_146">146</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>The murderess-daughter of Jezebel—Fierce ambition—Jehosheba—The -rescued child—Reared in the Temple—The -high priest's plot—The coronation of the boy-king—Athaliah -enters the Temple—Her murder—The fate of Baal's high -priest—Proposed restoration of the Temple—Joash calls to -task the defaulting priests—Death of Jehoiada—Defection of -Joash—Murder of Zechariah—Bad record of the line of Jewish -priests—Hazael attacks Judah—Defeat of Joash and plunder -of Jerusalem—Murder of Joash—Names of the murderers.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XV</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">AMAZIAH OF JUDAH (B.C. 796-783[?])</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_167">167</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>The House of David—Amaziah brings to justice the -murderers of his father, but spares their children—Grounds -for this—Different views taken of him by the historian and the -chronicler—Splendid victory of Amaziah in the Valley of Salt—Expansion -of the story in the Chronicles—His defiance of -Joash—His defeat and murder.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XVI</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE DYNASTY OF JEHU—JEHOAHAZ (B.C. 814-797)—JOASH -(B.C. 797-781)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_175">175</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Israel at its nadir—Calf-worship—Oppression of Hazael—Disappearance -of Elisha—Repentance of Jehoahaz—Joash<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_ix" id="Page_ix">[Pg ix]</a></span> -of Israel visits the death-bed of Elisha—"The arrow of the -Lord's deliverance"—Three victories over the Syrians—Death -of Elisha, and posthumous marvels—Joash and Amaziah—Contemptuous -answer to the King of Judah—Crushing defeat -of Judah.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XVII</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE DYNASTY OF JEHU (CONTINUED)—JEROBOAM II. (B.C. 781-740)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_187">187</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Jeroboam II. the greatest of the kings of Israel—His conquests -and wide dominion—A dying gleam of prosperity—Cause -of his success—Relations with Assyria—Dawn of -written prophecy—Jonah.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XVIII</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">AMOS AND HOSEA—ZACHARIAH BEN-JEROBOAM (B.C. 740)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_193">193</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Amos describes the condition of Israel—Growth of usury -and vice—Humble origin of Amos—His burdens—Degenerations -of the "calf-worship"—Uncompromising denunciation—Collision -of Amos with Amaziah the high priest at Bethel—His -expulsion from Bethel—The curse denounced—His justification -of his mission—Hosea the saddest of the prophets—His -pictures of Ephraim—Jeroboam II.—His death—His -son Zachariah—His desertion and shameful end.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XIX</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">UZZIAH OF JUDAH (B.C. 783[?]-737)—JOTHAM (B.C. 737-735)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_209">209</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Wane of Assyria—Uzziah a wise and good king—His other -name Azariah—Expansion of the story of his conquests in -the Chronicles—Training of his army—Defeated by the Assyrians -(?)—Stricken with leprosy—The story—Jotham acts -as his public representative—Diminished power of Judah -under Jotham—Beginning of Isaiah's prophecies—Death of -Jotham.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XX<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_x" id="Page_x">[Pg x]</a></span></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE AGONY OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM—SHALLUM, MENAHEM, PEKAHIAH, -PEKAH (B.C. 740-734)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_217">217</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Shallum, an usurping murderer—Rapid disappearance of -kings—Distracted epoch—The prophet Zechariah and the -three shepherds—Zechariah's prophecies—The cruel shepherd, -Menahem—His savage deeds—Portentous appearance of the -Assyrians in Israel—Menahem pays tribute—Tiglath-Pileser—Fulfilment -of Hosea's prophecy—Pekahiah—His murder—Pekah—His -alliance with Rezin against Judah—Ahaz appeals -to Assyria—Defeat and death of Rezin—Fulfilment of prophecy -of Amos—Beginning of the captivity of the Ten Tribes—Tiglath-Pileser's -successors—Murder of Pekah by Hoshea—Horrible -state of Israel as described by Isaiah.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXI</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">KING HOSHEA AND THE FALL OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM (B.C. -734-725)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_235">235</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>The name Hoshea—The king and the prophet—Occasional -gleams of hope and promise—A humiliating reign—Death of -Tiglath-Pileser—Hoshea revolts to Sabaco of Egypt—Seized -by Shalmaneser—Samaria besieged—Terrible state of the -city—Sabaco renders no help—Usurpation of Sargon—Capture -of the city—Greatness of Sargon—Fall of the Northern Kingdom—Blighted -destiny—God's mercy—"God, and not man"—Despoliation -of the tribes—Moral of the story—Assyria and -Egypt—The strength and weakness of a nation—Machiavelli—Mixture -of alien emigrants—Their worship—The lions—Strange -syncretism—The Jews and the Samaritans.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXII</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE REIGN OF AHAZ (B.C. 735-715)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_260">260</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>The chronology—A distracted kingdom—Dark pictures -from Isaiah—No sign of repentance—Grapes and wild grapes.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXIII<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xi" id="Page_xi">[Pg xi]</a></span></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">ISAIAH AND AHAZ</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_265">265</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Isaiah—Rezin and Pekah—Ahaz meets Isaiah—He receives -a promise of deliverance—He refuses a sign—The sign given -him—Immanuel—Birth of Messianic prophecy—Maher-shalal-hash-baz—The -promised Deliverer.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXIV</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE APOSTASIES OF AHAZ</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_273">273</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Moloch-worship—Sacrifice of children—Ahaz appeals to -Assyria for help—Ruin of Damascus and death of Rezin—Ahaz -does homage to Tiglath-Pileser at Damascus—Records -of Tiglath-Pileser—The new altar—Complaisance of the priest -Urijah—Unpopularity of Ahaz—Further misgivings—His -death.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXV</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">HEZEKIAH (B.C. 715-686)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_287">287</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Dates—Importance of the reign—Hezekiah's age—His character—His -reformation—Partial suppression of the <i>bamoth</i>—Removal -of the <i>matstseboth</i> and <i>Asherim</i>—Destruction of the -brazen serpent—Trust in Jehovah—Psalm xlvi.—Chastisement -of the Philistines—Three parties in Jerusalem—1. The -Assyrian party—2. The Egyptian party—3. The national -party—Its attitude to the others—Micah—Mockery of Egypt—Anger -and insults of the priests against Isaiah—Confidence -of Isaiah—Waverings of Hezekiah.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXVI</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">HEZEKIAH'S SICKNESS—THE BABYLONIAN EMBASSY</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_305">305</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>The story of Hezekiah's illness misplaced—At the point of -death—Isaiah's message—The king's agony of mind—The -prayer—The reprieve—The sun-dial of Ahaz—The king's -gratitude and thanksgiving—Merodach-Baladan—Rising -power of Babylon—Object of the embassy—The king's action—The -prophet's reproof—The king's humble submission.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXVII<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xii" id="Page_xii">[Pg xii]</a></span></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">HEZEKIAH AND ASSYRIA (B.C. 701)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_319">319</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Greatness of Sargon—His campaigns—Defeat of Egypt at -the battle of Raphia—Ashdod—Defeat of Merodach-Baladan—Grandeur -of Sennacherib—His invasion of Juda—Earlier -collisions—His campaigns—1. Against Babylon—2. Against -Elam—3. Against the Hittites and Philistines—Defeat of the -Ethiopian Tirhakah at Altaqu—Heavy mulct imposed on -Hezekiah—Siege of Lachish—Sennacherib breaks his compact—Distress -of Jerusalem.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXVIII</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE GREAT DELIVERANCE (B.C. 701)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_331">331</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Embassy of the Turtan, the Rabsaris, and the Rabshakeh—Misery -and licence in the city—The conference—Oration of -the Rabshakeh—Its effect on the king's ministers and on the -people—Taunting insults of the Rabshakeh—Faithfulness -and self-control of the people—Heroic faith of Isaiah—Failure -of the embassy—Sennacherib's threatening letter—Hezekiah's -prayer—Isaiah promises deliverance in the name of Jehovah—The -sign—The angel of death—Scene of the catastrophe—The -Egyptian tradition of Sethos and the mice—Death and -burial of Hezekiah—The campaign as recorded on the Assyrian -monuments—The triumph of indomitable faith—Grandeur of -Isaiah—Wane of Assyria—Beautiful tolerance of Isaiah.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXIX</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">MANASSEH (B.C. 686-641)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_351">351</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>The name Manasseh—His tender age—Influence of evil -counsellors—Heathenising party—Their dislike of Hezekiah's -reformation and of the exclusive worship of Jehovah—Tendency -to trust in sacrifices and asceticism—Sanctification -of licence—Arguments of the heathenisers—Disparagement -of the work of Isaiah—Doubts and disbelief—Influence of -the <i>bamoth</i>-priests—Reliance on Assyria—The immoral and -idolatrous reaction—1. Restoration of the <i>bamoth</i>, and arguments -in their favour—2. Adoption of Phœnician nature-worship—3.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xiii" id="Page_xiii">[Pg xiii]</a></span> -Assyrian Sabaism and star-worship—Connivance -of the priests—4. Canaanite Moloch-worship—5. Mesopotamian -Shamanism—6. The <i>Asherah</i>—Denunciation of the -prophets—Persecution and the shedding of innocent blood—Asserted -captivity, repentance, and reforming energy of -Manasseh—Difficulties of the story—Reign of Amon (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> -641-639)—Wretchedness of his reign—Zephaniah and Jeremiah—Murder -of Amon.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXX</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">JOSIAH (B.C. 639-608)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_374">374</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Three vast movements—Jeremiah's earlier prophecies—The -state of society—The Scythians—Prophecies of Ezekiel—Herodotus—The -fate of Nineveh—Rise of the Chaldans—Habakkuk.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXXI</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">JOSIAH'S REFORMATION</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_385">385</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Growth of Josiah's character—Repairs of the Temple—Hilkiah -finds the Book of the Law—Intense effect produced on -mind of the king—His message to the prophetess Huldah—Great -assembly—Renewal of a solemn league and covenant -with Jehovah—The <i>bamoth</i>-priests degraded—Defiling of -Tophet—He carries the reformation into Samaria—Its stringency -and severity—The Passover—Suppression of heathen -corruptions—Jeremiah's share in the reformation—Its dangers -and disappointing results—Jeremiah's warnings against all -trust in externals—The prophecy of a new covenant—<span class="smcap">Note -to Chapter</span> XXXI.: The Book found in the Temple.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXXII</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE DEATH OF JOSIAH (B.C. 608)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_402">402</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Prosperity and happiness of Josiah—Accession of the great -Pharaoh Necho II.—His excursion against Carchemish—Josiah -determines to bar his path—Warnings of Pharaoh Necho—Disaster -at Megiddo and death of Josiah—Mistaken hopes—God's -dealings with men and nations—Distress among -Josiah's subjects—The king's burial—Misgivings respecting -the future—Sorrow of Jeremiah—Ultimate fulfilments.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXXIII<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xiv" id="Page_xiv">[Pg xiv]</a></span></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">JEHOAHAZ (B.C. 608)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_411">411</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Four sons of Josiah—Shallum chosen by the people of the -land—Elegy of Ezekiel—Change of name from Shallum to -Jehoahaz—Conquests of Pharaoh Necho II.—Jehoahaz summoned -to Riblah—Carried captive by Pharaoh to Egypt—Tribute -imposed on Juda.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXXIV</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">JEHOIAKIM (B.C. 608-597)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_416">416</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Eliakim—His change of name—Ignored by Ezekiel—Evil -influences—sthetic selfishness and oppressive greed—Denunciation -by Habakkuk—Denunciation by Jeremiah—Murder -of Urijah—Threatened murder of Jeremiah averted -by Ahikam—Fall of Nineveh—Utterances of the prophets—Rise -of the Chaldans—Nabopolassar—Defeat of Pharaoh -Necho by Nebuchadrezzar—His return to Babylon—His invasion -of Juda—Beginning of the Babylonian captivity—Jehoiakim -revolts to Egypt in spite of Jeremiah's warnings—Imprisonment -of Jeremiah—Baruch—The menacing roll—Alarm -of the princes—Rage of the king—He cuts the scroll -to pieces and burns it—Wretchedness of the times—A great -drought—Captives of Jerusalem—Miserable death of Jehoiakim—"That -which was found in him."</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXXV</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">JEHOIACHIN (B.C. 597)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_431">431</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Bad influence over him—His brief reign—Allusions to him -by Jeremiah at Jerusalem—Second captivity—Regret felt for -Jehoiachin—Did he die childless?</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXXVI</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">ZEDEKIAH, THE LAST KING OF JUDAH (B.C. 597-586)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_437">437</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>His oath to the King of Assyria—Ezekiel's prophecies—The -exiles and the remnant—Weakness of Zedekiah—Continuance -of idolatry as described by Ezekiel—The king breaks his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xv" id="Page_xv">[Pg xv]</a></span> -oath with Assyria—Indignation and warnings of Jeremiah—The -false prophet Hananiah—The wooden and iron yokes—Death -of Hananiah—False prophets—The broken covenant—Advance -of Nebuchadrezzar—Belomancy and Babylonian -divinations—Siege of Jerusalem—Gloom of Jeremiah's prophecies.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXXVII</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">JEREMIAH AND HIS PROPHECIES</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_449">449</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Pathos of Jeremiah's lot—The sad epoch in which he lived—Religious -changes—Arrest of Jeremiah—Progress of the siege—Zedekiah -sends for the prophet—His hardships alleviated—Horrors -of famine—Wicked defiance—A sudden death—Anger -of the priests and nobles against Jeremiah—He is thrust -into a miry pit—Compassion of Ebed-Melech—Purchase of a -field at Anathoth—Secret interview with Zedekiah—It -becomes known—Distress of Zedekiah.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXXVIII</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE FALL OF JERUSALEM (B.C. 586)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_457">457</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Nebuzaradan and the Babylonians—The final captivity—Dreadful -fate of Zedekiah—Prophecies of Ezekiel and Jeremiah—Sack -of the city—Massacre of the chief inhabitants—Burning -of the city and Temple—Desolation—Respect shown by the -Babylonian general to Jeremiah—He decides to remain with -the remnant in Juda.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">CHAPTER XXXIX</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">GEDALIAH (B.C. 586)</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_465">465</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>Sad parting from the exiles—The wail at Ramah—Gedaliah's appointment as satrap -perhaps due to Jeremiah—Desolation of Jerusalem—The seat of government -removed to Mizpah—A respite and a gleam of hope—Guerilla bands—Johanan warns -Gedaliah against Ishmael—Unsuspecting generosity of the governor—He receives -Ishmael and his confederates with hospitality—He is brutally murdered—Massacre of -the pilgrims from Shiloh—The horrible well—Johanan pursues Ishmael—His escape— -Proposal to migrate to Egypt—Jeremiah consulted—His advice refused—Prophecy of <span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_xvi" id="Page_xvi">[Pg xvi]</a></span> -Jeremiah at the khan of Chimham—Kindness shown by Evil-Merodach to Jehoiachin.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="c2">EPILOGUE</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_477">477</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2" colspan="2"><blockquote> - -<p>The interest of the preceding history and the great moral -lessons which it involves—The central conceptions of Hebrew -prophecy—The end of the whole matter.</p></blockquote></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">APPENDIX I</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">THE KINGS OF ASSYRIA, AND SOME OF THEIR INSCRIPTIONS</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_487">487</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">APPENDIX II</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">INSCRIPTION IN THE TUNNEL OF THE POOL OF SILOAM</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_493">493</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">APPENDIX III</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">WAS THERE A GOLDEN CALF AT DAN?</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_494">494</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2">APPENDIX IV</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td class="c2">DATES OF THE KINGS OF ISRAEL AND JUDAH, AS GIVEN BY KITTEL AND -OTHER MODERN CRITICS</td> - <td class="c3"><a href="#Page_495">495</a></td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - - </tbody> -</table> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_1" id="Page_1">[Pg 1]</a></span></p> - - - - -<h2>THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS</h2> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_2" id="Page_2">[Pg 2]</a></span></p> - - - - -<p>"Theories of inspiration which impaginate the Everlasting Spirit, -and make each verse a cluster of objectless and mechanical miracles, -are not seriously believed by any one: the Bible itself abides in -its endless power and unexhausted truth. All that is not of asbestos -is being burned away by the restless fires of thought and criticism. -That which remains is enough, and it is indestructible."—<span class="smcap">Bishop of -Derry.</span></p> - -<hr /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_3" id="Page_3">[Pg 3]</a></span></p> - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_I" id="CHAPTER_I">CHAPTER I</a></h2> - -<h3><i>AHAZIAH BEN-AHAB OF ISRAEL</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 855-854</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> i. 1-18</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"Ye know not of what spirit are ye."—<span class="smcap">Luke</span> ix. 55.</p> - -<p>"He is the mediator of a better covenant, which hath been enacted -upon better promises."—<span class="smcap">Heb.</span> viii. 6.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>Ahaziah, the eldest son and successor of Ahab, -has been called "the most shadowy of the -Israelitish kings."<a name="FNanchor_1_1" id="FNanchor_1_1"></a><a href="#Footnote_1_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a> He seems to have been in all -respects one of the most weak, faithless, and deplorably -miserable. He did but reign two years—perhaps -in reality little more than one; but this brief space was -crowded with intolerable disasters. Everything that he -touched seemed to be marked out for ruin or failure, -and in character he showed himself a true son of -Jezebel and Ahab.</p> - -<p>What results followed the defeat of Ahab and -Jehoshaphat at Ramoth-Gilead we are not told. The<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_4" id="Page_4">[Pg 4]</a></span> -war must have ended in terms of peace of some kind—perhaps -in the cession of Ramoth-Gilead; for Ahaziah -does not seem to have been disturbed during his brief -reign by any Syrian invasion. Nor were there any -troubles on the side of Judah. Ahaziah's sister was -the wife of Jehoshaphat's heir, and the good understanding -between the two kingdoms was so closely cemented, -that in both royal houses there was an identity of -names—two Ahaziahs and two Jehorams.</p> - -<p>But even the Judan alliance was marked with -misfortune. Jehoshaphat's prosperity and ambition, together -with his firm dominance over Edom—in which -country he had appointed a vassal, who was sometimes -allowed the courtesy title of king<a name="FNanchor_2_2" id="FNanchor_2_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a>—led him to emulate -Solomon by an attempt to revive the old maritime -enterprise which had astonished Jerusalem with ivory, -and apes, and peacocks imported from India. He -therefore built "ships of Tarshish" at Ezion-Geber to -sail to Ophir. They were called "Tarshish-ships," -because they were of the same build as those which -sailed to Tartessus, in Spain, from Joppa. Ahaziah -was to some extent associated with him in the enterprise. -But it turned out even more disastrously than -it had done in former times. So unskilled was the -seamanship of those days among all nations except -the Phœnicians, that the whole fleet was wrecked and -shattered to pieces in the very harbour of Ezion-Geber -before it had set sail.</p> - -<p>Ahaziah, whose affinity with the King of Tyre -and possession of some of the western ports had -given his subjects more knowledge of ships and -voyages, then proposed to Jehoshaphat that the vessels<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_5" id="Page_5">[Pg 5]</a></span> -should be manned with sailors from Israel as well -as Judah. But Jehoshaphat was tired of a futile and -expensive effort. He refused a partnership which -might easily lead to complications, and on which the -prophets of Jehovah frowned. It was the last attempt -made by the Israelites to become merchants by sea as -well as by land.</p> - -<p>Ahaziah's brief reign was marked by one immense -humiliation. David, who extended the dominion of the -Hebrews in all directions, had smitten the Moabites, -and inflicted on them one of the horrible atrocities -against which the ill-instructed conscience of men in -those days of ignorance did not revolt.<a name="FNanchor_3_3" id="FNanchor_3_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3_3" class="fnanchor">[3]</a> He had made -the male warriors lie on the ground, and then, measuring -them by lines, he put every two lines to death and -kept one alive. After this the Moabites had continued -to be tributaries. They had fallen to the share of -the Northern Kingdom, and yearly acknowledged the -suzerainty of Israel by paying a heavy tribute of the -fleeces of a hundred thousand lambs and a hundred -thousand rams. But now that the warrior Ahab was -dead, and Israel had been crushed by the catastrophe -at Ramoth-Gilead, Mesha, the energetic viceroy of -Moab, seized his opportunity to revolt and to break -from the neck of his people the odious yoke. The -revolt was entirely successful. The sacred historian -gives us no details, but one of the most priceless of -modern archological discoveries has confirmed the -Scriptural reference by securing and translating a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_6" id="Page_6">[Pg 6]</a></span> -fragment of Mesha's own account of the annals of his -reign. We have, in what is called "The Moabite -Stone," the memorial written in glorification of himself -and of his god Chemosh, "the abomination of the -children of Ammon," by a contemporary of Ahab -and Jehoshaphat.<a name="FNanchor_4_4" id="FNanchor_4_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_4_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> It is the oldest specimen which we -possess of Hebrew writing; perhaps the only specimen, -except the Siloam inscription, which has come down -to us from before the date of the Exile. It was discovered -in 1878 by the German missionary Klein, -amid the ruins of the royal city of Daibon (Dibon, -Num. xxi. 30), and was purchased for the Berlin -Museum in 1879. Owing to all kinds of errors and -intrigues, it did not remain in the hands of its purchaser, -but was broken into fragments by the nomad tribe of -Beni Hamide, from whom it was in some way obtained -by M. Clermont-Ganneau. There is no ground for -questioning its perfect genuineness, though the discovery -of its value led to the forgery of a number -of spurious and often indecent inscriptions. There -can be no reasonable doubt that when we look at it -we see before us the identical memorial of triumph -which the Moabite emr erected in the days of Ahaziah -on the <i>bamah</i> of Chemosh at Dibon, one of his chief -towns.</p> - -<p>This document is supremely interesting, not only for -its historical allusions, but also as an illustration of -customs and modes of thought which have left their -traces in the records of the people of Jehovah, as well -as in those of the people of Chemosh.<a name="FNanchor_5_5" id="FNanchor_5_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> Mesha tells us -that his father reigned in Dibon for thirty years, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_7" id="Page_7">[Pg 7]</a></span> -that he succeeded. He reared this stone to Chemosh -in the town of Karcha, as a memorial of gratitude for -the assistance which had resulted in the overthrow of -all his enemies. Omri, King of Israel, had oppressed -Moab many days, because Chemosh was wroth with -his people. Ahaziah wished to oppress Moab as his -father had done. But Chemosh enabled Mesha to -recover Medeba, and afterwards Baal-Meon, Kirjatan, -Ataroth, Nebo, and Jahaz, which he reoccupied and -rebuilt. Perhaps they had been practically abandoned -by all effective Israelite garrisons. In some of these -towns he put the inhabitants under a ban, and sacrificed -them to Moloch in a great slaughter. In Nebo alone he -slew seven thousand men. Having turned many towns -into fortresses, he was enabled to defy Israel altogether, -to refuse the old burdensome tribute, and to re-establish -a strong Moabite kingdom east of the Dead Sea; for -Israel was wholly unable to meet his forces in the open -field. Month after month of the reign of the miserable -son of Ahab must have been marked by tidings of -shame, defeat, and massacre.</p> - -<p>Added to these public calamities, there came to -Ahaziah a terrible personal misfortune. As he was -coming down from the roof of his palace, he seems -to have stopped to lean against the lattice of some -window or balcony in his upper chamber in Samaria.<a name="FNanchor_6_6" id="FNanchor_6_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> -It gave way under his weight, and he was hurled down -into the courtyard or street below. He was so seriously -hurt that he spent the rest of his reign on a sick-bed in -pain and weakness, and ultimately died of the injuries -he had received.</p> - -<p>A succession of woes so grievous might well have<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_8" id="Page_8">[Pg 8]</a></span> -awakened the wretched king to serious thought. But -he had been trained under the idolatrous influences of -his mother. As though it were not enough for him to -walk in the steps of Ahab, of Jezebel, and of Jeroboam, -he had the fatuity to go out of his way to patronise -another and yet more odious superstition. Ekron was -the nearest town to him of the Philistine Pentapolis, -and at Ekron was established the local cult of a particular -Baal known as Baal-Zebub ("the lord of flies").<a name="FNanchor_7_7" id="FNanchor_7_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7_7" class="fnanchor">[7]</a> -Flies, which in temperate countries are sometimes an -intense annoyance, become in tropical climates an -intolerable plague. Even the Greeks had their Zeus -Apomuios ("Zeus the averter of flies"), and some Greek -tribes worshipped Zeus Ipuktonos ("Zeus the slayer of -vermin"), and Zeus Muiagros and Apomuios, and Apollo -Smintheus ("the destroyer of mice").<a name="FNanchor_8_8" id="FNanchor_8_8"></a><a href="#Footnote_8_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> The Romans, too, -among the numberless quaint heroes of their Pantheon, -had a certain Myiagrus and Myiodes, whose function -it was to keep flies at a distance.<a name="FNanchor_9_9" id="FNanchor_9_9"></a><a href="#Footnote_9_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a> This fly-god, Baal-Zebub -of Ekron, had an oracle, to whose lying responses<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_9" id="Page_9">[Pg 9]</a></span> -the young and superstitious prince attached implicit -credence. That a king of Israel professing any sort -of allegiance to Jehovah, and having hundreds of -prophets in his own kingdom, should send an embassy -to the shrine of an abominable local divinity in a town -of the Philistines—whose chief object of worship was</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"That twice-battered god of Palestine,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Who mourned in earnest when the captive ark<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Maimed his brute image on the grunsel edge<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Where he fell flat, and shamed his worshippers"—<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>was, it must be admitted, an act of apostasy more outrageously -insulting than had ever yet been perpetrated by -any Hebrew king. Nothing can more clearly illustrate -the callous indifference shown by the race of Jezebel to -the lessons which God had so decisively taught them -by Elijah and by Micaiah.</p> - -<p>But</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0"><i>Quem vult Deus perire, dementat prius</i>;<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>and in this "dementation preceding doom" Ahaziah -sent to ask the fly-god's oracle whether he should -recover of his injury. His infatuated perversity became -known to Elijah, who was bidden by "the angel," or -messenger, "of the Lord"—which may only be the -recognised phrase in the prophetic schools, putting in a -concrete and vivid form the voice of inward inspiration—to -go up, apparently on the road towards Samaria, -and meet the messengers of Ahaziah on their way to -Ekron. Where Elijah was at the time we do not know. -Ten years had elapsed since the calling of Elisha, and -four since Elijah had confronted Ahab at the door of -Naboth's vineyard. In the interval he has not once -been mentioned, nor can we conjecture with the least -certainty whether he had been living in congenial<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_10" id="Page_10">[Pg 10]</a></span> -solitude or had been helping to train the Sons of the -Prophets in the high duties of their calling. Why he -had not appeared to support Micaiah we cannot tell. -Now, at any rate, the son of Ahab was drawing upon -himself an ancient curse by going a-whoring after -wizards and familiar spirits, and it was high time for -Elijah to interfere.<a name="FNanchor_10_10" id="FNanchor_10_10"></a><a href="#Footnote_10_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a></p> - -<p>The messengers had not proceeded far on their way -when the prophet met them, and sternly bade them go -back to their king, with the denunciation, "Is it because -there is no God in Israel that ye go to inquire of Baal-Zebub, -the god of Ekron? Now, therefore, thus saith -Jehovah, 'Thou shalt not descend from that bed on -which thou art gone up, but dying thou shalt die.'"</p> - -<p>He spoke, and after his manner vanished with no -less suddenness.</p> - -<p>The messengers, overawed by that startling apparition, -did not dream of daring to disobey. They at once went -back to the king, who, astonished at their reappearance -before they could possibly have reached the oracle, -asked them why they had returned.</p> - -<p>They told him of the apparition by which they had -been confronted. That it was a prophet who had -spoken to them they knew; but the appearances of -Elijah had been so few, and at such long intervals, that -they knew not who he was.</p> - -<p>"What sort of man was he that spoke to you?" -asked the king.</p> - -<p>"He was," they answered, "a lord of hair,<a name="FNanchor_11_11" id="FNanchor_11_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_11_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a> and -girded about his loins with a girdle of skin."<a name="FNanchor_12_12" id="FNanchor_12_12"></a><a href="#Footnote_12_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_11" id="Page_11">[Pg 11]</a></span></p> - -<p>Too well did Ahaziah recognise from this description -the enemy of his guilty race! If he had not been -present on Carmel, or at Jezreel, on the occasions when -that swart and shaggy figure of the awful Wanderer -had confronted his father, he must have often heard -descriptions of this strange Bedawy ascetic who "feared -man so little because he feared God so much."</p> - -<p>"It is Elijah the Tishbite!" he exclaimed, with a -bitterness which was succeeded by fierce wrath; and -with something of his mother's indomitable rage he -sent a captain with fifty soldiers to arrest him.</p> - -<p>The captain found Elijah sitting at the top of "the -hill," perhaps of Carmel; and what followed is thus -described:—</p> - -<p>"Thou man of God," he cried, "the king hath said, -Come down."</p> - -<p>There was something strangely incongruous in this -rude address. The title "man of God" seems first to -have been currently given to Elijah, and it recognises -his inspired mission as well as the supernatural power -which he was believed to wield. How preposterous, -then, was it to bid a man of God to obey a king's order -and to give himself up to imprisonment or death!</p> - -<p>"If I be a man of God," said Elijah, "then let fire -come down from heaven, to consume thee and thy -fifty."<a name="FNanchor_13_13" id="FNanchor_13_13"></a><a href="#Footnote_13_13" class="fnanchor">[13]</a></p> - -<p>The fire fell and reduced them all to ashes.<a name="FNanchor_14_14" id="FNanchor_14_14"></a><a href="#Footnote_14_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a></p> - -<p>Undeterred by so tremendous a consummation, the -king sent another captain with his fifty, who repeated -the order in terms yet more imperative.<a name="FNanchor_15_15" id="FNanchor_15_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_15_15" class="fnanchor">[15]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_12" id="Page_12">[Pg 12]</a></span></p> - -<p>Again Elijah called down the fire from heaven, and -the second captain with his fifty soldiers was reduced -to ashes.</p> - -<p>For the third time the obstinate king, whose infatuation -must indeed have been transcendent, despatched -a captain with his fifty. But he, warned by the fate -of his predecessors, went up to Elijah and fell on his -knees, and implored him to spare the life of himself -and his fifty innocent soldiers.</p> - -<p>Then "the angel of the Lord" bade Elijah go down -to the king with him and not be afraid.</p> - -<p>What are we to think of this narrative?</p> - -<p>Of course, if we are to judge it on such moral grounds -as we learn from the spirit of the Gospel, Christ Himself -has taught us to condemn it. There have been men -who so hideously misunderstood the true lessons of -revelation as to applaud such deeds, and hold them up -for modern imitation. The dark persecutors of the -Spanish Inquisition, nay, even men like Calvin and -Beza, argued from this scene that "fire is the proper -instrument for the punishment of heretics." To all -who have been thus misled by a false and superstitious -theory of inspiration, Christ Himself says, with unmistakable -plainness, as He said to the Sons of Thunder -at Engannim, "Ye know not what spirit ye are of. -I am not come to destroy men's lives, but to save."<a name="FNanchor_16_16" id="FNanchor_16_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_16_16" class="fnanchor">[16]</a> In -the abstract, and judged by Christian standards, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_13" id="Page_13">[Pg 13]</a></span> -calling down of lightning to consume more than a -hundred soldiers, who were but obeying the orders -of a king—the protection of personal safety by the -miraculous destruction of a king's messengers—could -only be regarded as a deed of horror. "There are few -tracks of Elijah that are ordinary and fit for common -feet," says Bishop Hall; and he adds, "Not in his own -defence would the prophet have been the death of so -many, if God had not, by a peculiar instinct, made him -an instrument of His just vengeance."<a name="FNanchor_17_17" id="FNanchor_17_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_17_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a></p> - -<p>For myself, I more than doubt whether we have any -right to appeal to these "peculiar instincts" and unrecorded -inspirations; and it is so important that we -should not form utterly false views of what Scripture -does and does not teach, that we must once more deal -with this narrative quite plainly, and not beat about -the bush with the untenable devices and effeminate -euphemisms of commentators, who give us the "to-and-fro-conflicting" -apologies of <i>a priori</i> theory instead of -the clear judgments of inflexible morality.</p> - -<p>"It is impossible not to feel," says Professor Milligan,<a name="FNanchor_18_18" id="FNanchor_18_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_18_18" class="fnanchor">[18]</a> -"that the events thus presented to us are of a very -startling kind, and that it is not easy to reconcile them -either with the conception that we form of an honoured -servant of God, or with our ideas of eternal justice. -Elijah rather appears to us at first sight as a proud, -arrogant, and merciless wielder of the power committed -to him: we wonder that an answer should have been -given to his prayer; we are shocked at the destruction -of so many men, who listened only to the command -of their captain and their king; and we cannot help -contrasting Elijah's conduct, as a whole, with the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_14" id="Page_14">[Pg 14]</a></span> -beneficent and loving tenderness of the New Testament -dispensation."</p> - -<p>Professor Milligan proceeds rightly to set aside the -attempts which have been made to represent the first -two captains and their fifties as especially guilty—which -is a most flimsy hypothesis, and would not in -any case touch the heart of the matter. He says that -the event stands on exactly the same footing as the -slaughter of the 450 prophets of Baal at Kishon, -and of the 3000 idolaters by order of Moses at Sinai; -the swallowing up of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram; the -ban of total extirpation on Jericho and on Canaan; -the sweeping massacre of the Amalekites by Saul; -and many similar instances of recorded savagery. -But the reference to analogous acts furnishes no justification -for those acts. What, then, is their justification, -if any can be found?</p> - -<p>Some would defend them on the grounds that the -potter may do what he likes with the clay. That -analogy, though perfectly admissible when used for the -purpose to which it is applied by St. Paul, is grossly -inapplicable to such cases as this. St. Paul uses it -simply to prove that we cannot judge or understand -the purposes of God, in which, as he shows, mercy -often lies behind apparent severity. But, when urged -to maintain the rectitude of sweeping judgments in -which a man arms his own feebleness with the -omnipotence of Heaven, they amount to no more -than the tyrant's plea that "might makes right." -"Man is a reed," said Pascal, "but he is a <i>thinking</i> -reed." He may not therefore be indiscriminately -crushed. He was made by God in His image, after -His likeness, and therefore his rights have a Divine -and indefeasible sanction.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_15" id="Page_15">[Pg 15]</a></span></p> - -<p>All that can be said is that these deeds of wholesale -severity were not in disaccord with the conscience -even of many of the best Old Testament saints. They -did not feel the least compunction in inflicting judgments -on whole populations in a way which would -argue in us an infamous callousness. Nay, their consciences -approved of those deeds; they were but acting -up to the standard of their times, and they regarded -themselves as righteous instruments of divinely directed -vengeance.<a name="FNanchor_19_19" id="FNanchor_19_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> Take, for instance, the frightful Eastern -law which among the Jews no less than among -Babylonians and Persians thought nothing of overwhelming -the innocent with the guilty in the same -catastrophe; which required the stoning, not only of -Achan, but of all Achan's innocent family, as an expiation -for his theft; and the stoning, not only of -Naboth, but also of Naboth's sons, in requital for his -asserted blasphemy. Two reasons may be assigned -for the chasm between their moral sense and ours on -such subjects—one was their amazing indifference to -the sacredness of human life, and the other their -invariable habit of regarding men in their corporate -relations rather than in their individual capacity. Our -conscience teaches us that to slay the innocent with -the guilty is an action of monstrous injustice;<a name="FNanchor_20_20" id="FNanchor_20_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_20_20" class="fnanchor">[20]</a> but -they, regarding each person as indissolubly mixed up -with all his family and tribe, magnified the conception<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_16" id="Page_16">[Pg 16]</a></span> -of <i>corporate responsibility</i>, and merged the individual -in the mass.</p> - -<p>It is clear that, if we take the narrative literally, -Elijah would not have felt the least remorse in calling -fire from heaven to consume these scores of soldiers, -because the prophetic narrator who recorded the story, -perhaps two centuries later, must have understood -the spirit of those days, and certainly felt no shame -for the prophet's act of vengeance. On the contrary, -he relates it with entire approval for the glorification -of his hero. We cannot blame him for not rising -above the moral standard of his age. He held that -the natural manifestation of an angry Jehovah was, -literally or metaphorically, in consuming fire. Considering -the slow education of mankind in the most -elementary principles of mercy and righteousness, we -must not judge the views of prophets who lived so -many ages before Christ by those of religious teachers -who enjoy the inherited experience of two millenniums -of Christianity. Thus much is plainly taught us by -Christ Himself, and there perhaps we might be content -to leave the question. But we are compelled -to ask, Do we not too much form all our judgments -of the Scripture narratives on <i>a priori</i> traditions and -unreasoned prejudices? Can we with adequate knowledge -and honest conviction declare our certainty -that this scene of destruction ever occurred as a -literal fact? If we turn to any of the great students -and critics of Germany, to whom we are indebted for -the floods of light which their researches have thrown -on the sacred page, they with almost consentient voice -regard these details of this story as legendary. There -is indeed every reason to believe the account of Ahaziah's -accident, of his sending to consult the oracle of Baal-Zebub,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_17" id="Page_17">[Pg 17]</a></span> -of the turning back of his messengers by -Elijah, and of the menace which he heard from the -prophet's lips. But the calling down of lightning to -consume his captains and soldiers to ashes belongs to -the cycle of Elijah-traditions preserved in the schools -of the prophets; and in the case of miracles so startling -and to our moral sense so repellent—miracles which -assume the most insensate folly on the part of the -king, and the most callous ruthlessness on the part of -the prophet—the question may be fairly asked, Is -there any proof, is there anything beyond dogmatic -assertion to convince us, that we were intended to -accept them <i>au pied de la lettre</i>? May they not be -the formal vehicle chosen for the illustration of the undoubted -powers and righteous mission of Elijah as the -upholder of the worship of Jehovah? In a literature -which abounds, as all Eastern literature abounds, in -vivid and concrete methods of indicating abstract truths, -have we any cogent proof that the supernatural details, -of which some may have been introduced into these -narratives by the scribes in the schools of the prophets, -were not, in some instances, <i>meant</i> to be regarded as -imaginative apologues? The most orthodox divines, -both Jewish and Christian, have not hesitated to treat -the Book of Jonah as an instance of the use of fiction -for purposes of moral and spiritual edification. Were -any critic to maintain that the story of the destruction -of Ahaziah's emissaries belongs to the same class of -narratives, I do not know how he could be refuted, -however much he might be denounced by stereotyped -prejudice and ignorance. I do not, however, myself -regard the story as a mere parable composed to show -how awful was the power of the prophets, and how -fearfully it might be exercised. I look upon it rather<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_18" id="Page_18">[Pg 18]</a></span> -as possibly the narrative of some event which has -been imaginatively embellished, and intermingled with -details which we call supernatural.<a name="FNanchor_21_21" id="FNanchor_21_21"></a><a href="#Footnote_21_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a> Circumstances -which we consider natural would be regarded as -directly miraculous by an Eastern enthusiast, who saw -in every event the immediate act of Jehovah to the -exclusion of all secondary causes, and who attributed -every occurrence of life to the intervention of those -"millions of spiritual creatures," who</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i20">"walk the earth<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Unseen both when we wake and when we sleep."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>If such a supposition be correct and admissible—and -assuredly it is based on all that we increasingly learn -of the methods of Eastern literature, and of the forms -in which religious ideas were inculcated in early ages—then -all difficulties are removed. We are not dealing -with the mercilessness of a prophet, or the wielding of -Divine powers in a manner which higher revelation -condemns, but only with the well-known fact that the -Elijah-spirit was not the Christ-spirit, and that the -scribes of Ramah or Gilgal, and "the men of the -tradition" and the "men of letters" who lived at Jabez, -when they used the methods of Targum and Haggadah -in handing down the stories of the prophets, had not -received that full measure of enlightenment which -came only when the Light of the World had shone.<a name="FNanchor_22_22" id="FNanchor_22_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a></p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_19" id="Page_19">[Pg 19]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_II" id="CHAPTER_II">CHAPTER II</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE ASCENSION OF ELIJAH</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> ii. 1-18</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>Ἠλίας ἐξ ἀνθρώπων ἠφανίσθη, καὶ οὐδεὶς ἔγνω μεχρὶς τῆς σήμερον αὐτοῦ τὴν τελεύτην.—<span class="smcap">Jos.</span>, <i>Antt.</i>, IX. ii. 2.</p> - -<p>Γεγόνασιν ἀφανεῖς, θάνατον δὲ αὐτῶν οὐδεὶς οἶδεν.—<span class="smcap">St. Ephrm Syrus.</span></p></blockquote> - - -<p>The date of the assumption of Elijah is wholly -uncertain, and it becomes still more so because -of the confusion of chronological order which results -from the composite character of the records here -collected. It appears from various scattered notices -that Elijah lived on till the reign of Jehoram of Judah, -whereas the narrative in this chapter is placed before -the death of Jehoshaphat.</p> - -<p>When the time came that "Jehovah would take up -Elijah by a whirlwind into heaven," the prophet had a -prevision of his approaching end, and determined for -the last time to visit the hills of his native Gilead. -The story of his end, though not written in rhythm, -is told in a style of the loftiest poetry, resembling other -ancient poems in its simple and solemn repetitions. -On his way to Gilead, Elijah desires to visit ancient -sanctuaries where schools of the prophets were now -established, and accompanied by Elisha, whose faithful -ministrations he had enjoyed for ten almost silent -years, he went to Gilgal. This was not the Gilgal in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_20" id="Page_20">[Pg 20]</a></span> -the Jordan valley so famous in the days of Joshua,<a name="FNanchor_23_23" id="FNanchor_23_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_23_23" class="fnanchor">[23]</a> but -<i>Jiljilia</i> in the hills of Ephraim,<a name="FNanchor_24_24" id="FNanchor_24_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_24_24" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> where many young -prophets were in course of training.<a name="FNanchor_25_25" id="FNanchor_25_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_25_25" class="fnanchor">[25]</a></p> - -<p>Knowing that he was on his way to death, Elijah -felt the imperious instinct which leads the soul to seek -solitude at the supreme crises of life. He would have -preferred that even Elisha should leave him, and he -bade him stop at Gilgal, because the Lord had sent -him as far as Bethel. But Elisha was determined to -see the end, and exclaimed with strong asseveration, -"As Jehovah liveth, and as thy soul liveth, I will not -leave thee."</p> - -<p>So they went on to Bethel, where there was another -school of prophets, under the immediate shadow of -Jeroboam's golden calf, though we are not told whether -they continued the protest of the old nameless seer -from Judah, or not.<a name="FNanchor_26_26" id="FNanchor_26_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_26_26" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> Here the youths of the college -came respectfully to Elisha—for they were prevented -by a sense of awe from addressing Elijah—and asked -him "whether he knew that that day God would take -away his master." "Yes, I know it," he answers; -but—for this is no subject for idle talk—"hold ye -your peace."</p> - -<p>Once more Elijah tries to shake off the attendance -of his friend and disciple. He bids him stay at Bethel, -since Jehovah has sent him on to Jericho. Once more -Elisha repeats his oath that he will not leave him,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_21" id="Page_21">[Pg 21]</a></span> -and once more the sons of the prophets at Jericho, -who warn him of what is coming, are told to say no -more.</p> - -<p>But little of the journey now remains. In vain -Elijah urges Elisha to stay at Jericho; they proceed -to Jordan. Conscious that some great event is impending, -and that Elijah is leaving these scenes for -ever, fifty of the sons of the prophets watch the two -as they descend the valley to the river. Here they -saw Elijah take off his mantle of hair, roll it up, and -smite the waters with it. The waters part asunder, -and the prophets pass over dry-shod.<a name="FNanchor_27_27" id="FNanchor_27_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27_27" class="fnanchor">[27]</a> As they crossed -over Elijah asks Elisha what he should do for him, -and Elisha entreats that a double portion of Elijah's -spirit may rest upon him. By this he does not mean -to ask for twice Elijah's power and inspiration, but -only for an elder son's portion, which was twice what -was inherited by the younger sons.<a name="FNanchor_28_28" id="FNanchor_28_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_28_28" class="fnanchor">[28]</a> "Thou hast -asked a hard thing," said Elijah; "but if thou seest -me when I am taken hence, it shall be so."</p> - -<p>The sequel can be only told in the words of the -text: "And it came to pass, as they still went on, and -talked, that, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_22" id="Page_22">[Pg 22]</a></span> -and horses of fire,<a name="FNanchor_29_29" id="FNanchor_29_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29_29" class="fnanchor">[29]</a> and parted them both asunder; and -Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven. And -Elisha saw it, and he cried, 'My father, my father, the -chariots of Israel, and the horsemen thereof!'<a name="FNanchor_30_30" id="FNanchor_30_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30_30" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> And -he saw him no more."</p> - -<p>Respecting the manner in which Elijah ended his -earthly career, we know nothing beyond what is conveyed -by this splendid narrative. His death, like that -of Moses, was surrounded by mystery and miracles, -and we can say nothing further about it. The question -must still remain unanswered for many minds whether -it was intended by the prophetic annalists for literal -history, for spiritual allegory, or for actual events -bathed in the colourings of an imagination to which -the providential assumed the aspect of the supernatural.<a name="FNanchor_31_31" id="FNanchor_31_31"></a><a href="#Footnote_31_31" class="fnanchor">[31]</a> -We are twice told that "Elijah went up by -a whirlwind into heaven,"<a name="FNanchor_32_32" id="FNanchor_32_32"></a><a href="#Footnote_32_32" class="fnanchor">[32]</a> and in that storm—which -would have seemed a fit scene for the close of a career -of storm—God, in the high poetry of the Psalmist, may -have made the winds His angels, and the flames of fire -His ministers. For us it must suffice to say of Elijah,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_23" id="Page_23">[Pg 23]</a></span> -as the Book of Genesis says of Enoch, that "he was -not, for God took him."</p> - -<p>Elisha signalised the removal of his master by a -burst of natural grief. He seized his garments and rent -them in twain. Elijah had dropped his mantle of skin, -and his grieving disciple took it with him as a priceless -relic.<a name="FNanchor_33_33" id="FNanchor_33_33"></a><a href="#Footnote_33_33" class="fnanchor">[33]</a> The legendary St. Antony bequeathed to St. -Athanasius the only thing which he had, his sheepskin -mantle; and in the mantle of Elijah his successor -inherited his most characteristic and almost his sole -possession. He returned to Jordan, and with this -mantle he smote the waters as Elijah had done. At -first they did not divide;<a name="FNanchor_34_34" id="FNanchor_34_34"></a><a href="#Footnote_34_34" class="fnanchor">[34]</a> but when he exclaimed, -"Where is the Lord, the God of Elijah, even He?" -they parted hither and thither. Seeing the portent, -the sons of the prophets came with humble prostrations, -and acknowledged him as their new leader.</p> - -<p>They were not, however, satisfied with what they -had seen, or had heard from Elisha, of the departure -of the great prophet, and begged leave to send fifty -strong men to search whether the wind of the Lord -had not swept him away to some mountain or valley. -Elisha at first refused, but afterwards yielded to their -persistent importunity. They searched for three days -among the hills of Gilead, but found him not, either -living or dead, as Elisha had warned them would be -the case.</p> - -<p>From that time forward Elijah has taken his place in -all Jewish and Mohammedan legends as the mysterious -and deathless wanderer. Malachi spoke of him as<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_24" id="Page_24">[Pg 24]</a></span> -destined to appear again to herald the coming of the -Messiah,<a name="FNanchor_35_35" id="FNanchor_35_35"></a><a href="#Footnote_35_35" class="fnanchor">[35]</a> and Christ taught His disciples that John -the Baptist had come in the spirit and power of Elijah. -In Jewish legend he often appears and disappears. -A chair is set for him at the circumcision of every -Jewish child. At the Paschal feast the door is set open -for him to enter. All doubtful questions are left for -decision until he comes again. To the Mohammedans -he is known as the wonder-working and awful El -Khudr.<a name="FNanchor_36_36" id="FNanchor_36_36"></a><a href="#Footnote_36_36" class="fnanchor">[36]</a></p> - -<p>Elisha is mentioned but once in all the later books -of Scripture; but Elijah is mentioned many times, and -the son of Sirach sums up his greatness when he says: -"Then stood up Elias as fire, and his word burned -like a torch. O Elias, how wast thou honoured in thy -wondrous deeds! and who may glory like unto thee—who -anointed kings to take revenge, and prophets to -succeed after him—who wast ordained for reproof in -their times, to pacify the wrath of the Lord's judgment -before it broke forth into fury, and to turn the heart -of the father unto the son, and to restore the tribes of -Jacob! Blessed are they that saw thee and slept in -love; for we shall surely live!"</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_25" id="Page_25">[Pg 25]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_III" id="CHAPTER_III">CHAPTER III</a></h2> - -<h3><i>ELISHA</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> ii. 1-25</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"He did wonders in his life, and at death even his works were -marvellous. For all this the people repented not."—<span class="smcap">Ecclus.</span> xlviii. -14, 15.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>At this point we enter into the cycle of supernatural -stories, which gathered round the name of Elisha -in the prophetic communities. Some of them are full -of charm and tenderness; but in some cases it is difficult -to point out their intrinsic superiority over the -ecclesiastical miracles with which monkish historians -have embellished the lives of the saints. We can but -narrate them as they stand, for we possess none of the -means for critical or historical analysis which might -enable us to discriminate between essential facts and -accidental elements.</p> - -<p>We see at once that the figure of Elisha<a name="FNanchor_37_37" id="FNanchor_37_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_37_37" class="fnanchor">[37]</a> is far less -impressive than that of Elijah. He inspires less of awe -and terror. He lives far more in cities and amid the -ordinary surroundings of civilised life. The honour -with which he was treated was the honour of respect -and admiration for his kindliness. He plays his part -in no stupendous scenes like those at Carmel and at -Horeb, and nearly all his miracles were miracles of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_26" id="Page_26">[Pg 26]</a></span> -mercy. Other remarkable differences are observable -in the records of Elijah and Elisha. In the case of the -former his main work was the opposition to Baal-worship; -but although Baal-worship still prevailed -(2 Kings x. 18-27) we read of no protests raised by -Elisha against it. "With him"—perhaps it should be -more accurately said, in the narrative which tells us of -him—"the miracles are everything, the prophetic work -nothing." The conception of a prophet's mission in -these stories of him differs widely from that which -dominates the splendid <i>midrash</i> of Elijah.</p> - -<p>His separate career began with an act of beneficence. -He had stopped for a time at Jericho. The curse of -the rebuilding of the town upon a site which Joshua -had devoted to the ban had expended itself on Hiel, its -builder. It was now a flourishing city, and the home -of a large school of prophets. But though the situation -was pleasant as "a garden of the Lord,"<a name="FNanchor_38_38" id="FNanchor_38_38"></a><a href="#Footnote_38_38" class="fnanchor">[38]</a> the water -was bad, and the land "miscarried." In other words, -the deleterious spring caused diseases among the inhabitants, -and caused the trees to cast their fruit. So -the men of the city came to Elisha, and humbly addressing -him as "my lord," implored his help. He told them -to bring him a new cruse full of salt, and going with -it to the fountain cast it into the springs, proclaiming -in Jehovah's name that they were healed, and that -there should be no more death or miscarrying land. -The gushing waters of the Ain-es-Sultn, fed by the -spring of Quarantania, are to this day pointed out as -the Fountains of Elisha, as they have been since the -days of Josephus.<a name="FNanchor_39_39" id="FNanchor_39_39"></a><a href="#Footnote_39_39" class="fnanchor">[39]</a></p> - -<p>The anecdote of this beautiful interposition to help<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_27" id="Page_27">[Pg 27]</a></span> -a troubled city is followed by one of the stories which -naturally repel us more than any other in the Old -Testament. Elisha, on leaving Jericho, returned to -Bethel, and as he climbed through the forest up the -ascent leading to the town through what is now called -the Wady Suweint, a number of young lads—with the -rudeness which in boys is often a venial characteristic -of their gay spirits or want of proper training, and which -to this day is common among boys in the East—laughed -at him, and mocked him with the cry "Go up, round-head! -go up, round-head!"<a name="FNanchor_40_40" id="FNanchor_40_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_40_40" class="fnanchor">[40]</a> What struck these ill-bred -and irreverent youngsters was the contrast between -the rough hair-skin garb and unkempt shaggy locks -of Elijah, "the lord of hair," and the smooth civilised -aspect and shorter hair of his disciple. If the word -<i>quereach</i> means "bald"<a name="FNanchor_41_41" id="FNanchor_41_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41_41" class="fnanchor">[41]</a> we see an additional reason -for their ill-mannered jeers, since baldness was a cause -of reproach and suspicion in the East, where it is -comparatively rare. No doubt, too, the conduct of -these young scoffers was the more offensive, and even -the more wicked, because of the deeper reverence for -age which prevails in Eastern countries, and above all -because Elisha was known as a prophet. Perhaps, -too, if some other reading lies behind the ἐλίθαζον -of one MS. of the Septuagint, they pelted him with<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_28" id="Page_28">[Pg 28]</a></span> -stones.<a name="FNanchor_42_42" id="FNanchor_42_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_42_42" class="fnanchor">[42]</a> That Elisha should have rebuked them, and -that seriously—that he should even have inflicted some -punishment upon them to reform their manners—would -have been natural; but we cannot repress the shudder -with which we read the verse, "And he turned back -and looked on them, and cursed them in the name -of the Lord. And there came forth two she-bears out -of the wood, and tare forty-and-two children of them." -Surely the punishment was disproportionate to the -offence! Who could doom so much as a single rude -boy, not to speak of forty-two, to a horrible and -agonising death for shouting after any one? It is the -chief exception to the general course of Elisha's compassionate -interpositions. Here, too, we must leave -the narrative where it is; but we hold it quite admissible -to conjecture that the incident, in some form or other, -really occurred—that the boys were insolent, and that -some of them may have been killed by the wild beasts -which at that time abounded in Palestine—and yet that -the <i>nuances</i> of the story which cause deepest offence -to us may have suffered from some corruption of the -tradition in the original records, and may admit of being -represented in a slightly different form.</p> - -<p>After this Elisha went for a time to the ancient -haunts of his master on Mount Carmel, and thence -returned to Samaria, the capital of his country, which -he seems to have chosen for his most permanent -dwelling-place.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_29" id="Page_29">[Pg 29]</a></span></p> - - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_IV" id="CHAPTER_IV">CHAPTER IV</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE INVASION OF MOAB</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> iii. 4-27</h4> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">"What reinforcement we may gain from hope,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 11em;">If not, what resolution from despair."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 22em;"><span class="smcap">Milton</span>, <i>Paradise Lost</i>, i. 190.</span></p> - - -<p>Ahaziah, as Elijah had warned him, never recovered -from the injuries received in his fall -through the lattice, and after his brief and luckless -reign died without a child. He was succeeded by his -brother Jehoram ("Jehovah is exalted"), who reigned -for twelve years.<a name="FNanchor_43_43" id="FNanchor_43_43"></a><a href="#Footnote_43_43" class="fnanchor">[43]</a></p> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_30" id="Page_30">[Pg 30]</a></span></p> -<p>Jehoram began well. Though it is said that he did -"that which was evil in the sight of the Lord," we are -told that he was not so guilty as his father or his mother. -He did not, of course, abolish the worship of Jehovah -under the cherubic symbol of the calves; no king of -Israel thought of doing that, and so far as we know -neither Elijah, nor Elisha, nor Jonah, nor Micaiah, nor -any genuine prophet of Israel before Hosea, ever -protested against that worship, which was chiefly -disparaged by prophets of Judah like Amos and the -nameless seer.<a name="FNanchor_44_44" id="FNanchor_44_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_44_44" class="fnanchor">[44]</a> But Jehoram at least removed the -<i>Matstsebah</i> or stone obelisk which had been reared in -Baal's honour in front of his temple by Ahab, or by -Jezebel in his name.<a name="FNanchor_45_45" id="FNanchor_45_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_45_45" class="fnanchor">[45]</a> In this direction, however, his -reformation must have been exceedingly partial, for -until the sweeping measures taken by Jehu the temple -and images of Baal still continued to exist in Samaria -under his very eyes, and must have been connived at -if not approved.</p> - -<p>The first great measure which occupied the thoughts -of Jehoram was to subdue the kingdom of Moab, which -had been restored to independence by the bravery of -the great pastoral-king Mesha;<a name="FNanchor_46_46" id="FNanchor_46_46"></a><a href="#Footnote_46_46" class="fnanchor">[46]</a> or at any rate to -avenge the series of humiliating defeats which Mesha -had inflicted on his brother Ahaziah. A war of forty -years' duration<a name="FNanchor_47_47" id="FNanchor_47_47"></a><a href="#Footnote_47_47" class="fnanchor">[47]</a> had ended in the complete success -of Moab. The loss of a tribute of the fleeces of one<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_31" id="Page_31">[Pg 31]</a></span> -hundred thousand lambs and one hundred thousand -rams was too serious to be lightly faced.<a name="FNanchor_48_48" id="FNanchor_48_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_48_48" class="fnanchor">[48]</a> Jehoram -laid his plans well. First he ordered a muster of all -the men of war throughout his kingdom, and then -appealed for the co-operation of Jehoshaphat and his -vassal-king of Edom. Both kings consented to join -him. Jehoshaphat had already been the victim of a -powerful and wanton aggression on the part of King -Mesha,<a name="FNanchor_49_49" id="FNanchor_49_49"></a><a href="#Footnote_49_49" class="fnanchor">[49]</a> from which he had been delivered by the -panic of his foes in the Valley of Salt. Though the -king of Edom had, on that occasion, been an ally of -Mesha, the forces of Edom had fallen the first victims -of that internecine panic. Both Judah and Edom, therefore, -had grave wrongs to avenge, and eagerly seized -the opportunity to humble the growing pride of the -people of Chemosh. The attack was wisely arranged. -It was determined to advance against Moab from the -south, through the territory of Edom, by a rough and -mountainous track, and, as far as possible, to take the -nation by surprise. The combined host took a seven -days' circuit round the south of the Dead Sea, hoping -to find an abundant supply of water in the stream -which flows through the Wady-el-Ahsa, which separates -Edom from Moab.<a name="FNanchor_50_50" id="FNanchor_50_50"></a><a href="#Footnote_50_50" class="fnanchor">[50]</a> But owing to recent droughts the -Wady was waterless, and the armies, with their horses, -suffered all the agonies of thirst. Jehoram gave way<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_32" id="Page_32">[Pg 32]</a></span> -to despair, bewailing that Jehovah should have brought -together these three kings to deliver them a helpless -prey into the hands of Moab. But the pious Jehoshaphat -at once thinks of "inquiring of the Lord" by some -true prophet, and one of Jehoram's courtiers informs -him that no less a person than Elisha, the son of -Shaphat, who had been the attendant of Elijah, is -with the host.<a name="FNanchor_51_51" id="FNanchor_51_51"></a><a href="#Footnote_51_51" class="fnanchor">[51]</a> We are surprised to find that his -presence in the camp had excited so little attention -as to be unknown to the king;<a name="FNanchor_52_52" id="FNanchor_52_52"></a><a href="#Footnote_52_52" class="fnanchor">[52]</a> but Jehoshaphat, on -hearing his name, instantly acknowledged his prophetic -inspiration. So urgent was the need, and so deep -the sense of Elisha's greatness, that the three kings -in person went on an embassy "to the servant of him -who ran before the chariot of Ahab." Their humble -appeal to him produced so little elation in his mind -that, addressing Jehoram, who was the most powerful, -he exclaimed, with rough indignation: "What have I -to do with thee? Get thee to the prophets of thy -father,"—nominal prophets of Jehovah, who will say -to thee smooth things and prophesy deceits, as four -hundred of them did to Ahab—"and to the Baal-prophets -of thy mother." Instead of resenting this<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_33" id="Page_33">[Pg 33]</a></span> -scant respect Jehoram, in utmost distress, deprecated -the prophet's anger, and appealed to his pity for the -peril of the three armies. But Elisha is not mollified. -He tells Jehoram that but for the presence of Jehoshaphat -he would not so much as look at him: so completely -was the destiny of the people mixed up with the -character of their kings! Out of respect for Jehoshaphat -Elisha will do what he can. But all his soul is in a -tumult of emotion. For the moment he can do nothing. -He needs to be calmed from his agitation by the spell -of music, and bids them send a minstrel to him. The -harper came, and as Elisha listened his soul was composed, -and "the hand of the Lord came upon him" to -illuminate and inspire his thoughts.<a name="FNanchor_53_53" id="FNanchor_53_53"></a><a href="#Footnote_53_53" class="fnanchor">[53]</a> The result was -that he bade them dig trenches in the dry wady, and -promised that, though they should see neither wind nor -rain, the valley should be filled with water to quench -the thirst of the fainting armies, their horses and their -cattle. After this God would also deliver the Moabites -into their hand; and they were bidden to smite the -cities, fell the trees, stop the wells, and mar the smiling -pasture-lands, which constituted the wealth of Moab, -with stones. That the hosts of Judah and Israel and -jealous Edom should be prone to afflict this awfully -devastating vengeance on a power by which they had -been so severely defeated on past occasions, and on -which they had so many wrongs and blood-feuds to -avenge, was natural; but it is surprising to find a -prophet of the Lord giving the commission to ruin the -gifts of God and spoil the innocent labours of man, -and thus to inflict misery on generations yet unborn.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_34" id="Page_34">[Pg 34]</a></span> -The behest is directly contrary to rules of international -war which have prevailed even between non-Christian -nations, among whom the stopping or poisoning of -wells and the cutting down of fruit trees has been -expressly forbidden. It is also against the rules of -war laid down in Deuteronomy.<a name="FNanchor_54_54" id="FNanchor_54_54"></a><a href="#Footnote_54_54" class="fnanchor">[54]</a> Such, however, was -the command attributed to Elisha; and, as we shall see, -it was fulfilled, and seems to have led to disastrous -consequences.</p> - -<p>Cheered by the promise of Divine aid which the -prophet had given them, the host retired to rest. The -next morning at day-dawn, when the <i>minchah</i> of fine -flour, oil, and frankincense was offered,<a name="FNanchor_55_55" id="FNanchor_55_55"></a><a href="#Footnote_55_55" class="fnanchor">[55]</a> water, which, -according to the tradition of Josephus, had fallen at -three days' distance on the hills of Edom, came flowing -from the south and filled the wady with its refreshing -streams.</p> - -<p>The incident itself is highly instructive. It throws -light both upon the general accuracy of the ancient -narrative, and on the fact that events to which a directly -supernatural colouring is given are, in many instances, -not so much supernatural as providential. The deliverance -of Israel was due, not to a portent wrought by -Elisha, but to the pure wisdom which he derived from -the inspiration of God. When the counsels of princes -were of none effect, and for lack of the spirit of counsel -the people were perishing, his mind alone, illuminated -by a wisdom from on high, saw what was the right step -to take. He bade the soldiers dig trenches in the dry -torrent bed,—which was the very step most likely to -ensure their deliverance from the torment of thirst, and -which would be done under similar circumstances to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_35" id="Page_35">[Pg 35]</a></span> -this day. They saw neither wind nor rain; but there -had been a storm among the farther hills, and the -swollen watercourses discharged their overflow into -the trenches of the wady which were ready prepared -for them, and offered the path of least resistance.</p> - -<p>Moab, meanwhile, had heard of the advance of the -three kings through the territories of Edom. The -whole military population had mustered in arms, and -stood on the frontier, on the other side of the dry -wady, to oppose the invasion. For they knew this -would be a struggle of life and death, and that if -defeated they would have no mercy to expect. When -the sun rose, and its first rays burned on the wady, -which had been dry on the previous evening, the water -which, unknown to the Moabites, had filled the trenches -in the night, looked red as blood. Doubtless it may -have been stained, as Ewald says, by the red soil -which gave its name to the red land of the "red king, -Edom"; but as it gleamed under the dawn the Moabites -thought that those seemingly crimson pools had been -filled with the blood of their enemies, who had fallen -by each other's swords. Their own recent experience -when Jehoshaphat met them in the Valley of Salt -showed them how easy it was for temporary allies -to be seized by panic, and to fight among themselves.<a name="FNanchor_56_56" id="FNanchor_56_56"></a><a href="#Footnote_56_56" class="fnanchor">[56]</a></p> - -<p>The army of their invaders was composed of heterogeneous -and mutually conflicting elements. Between -Israel and Judah there had been nearly a century -of war,<a name="FNanchor_57_57" id="FNanchor_57_57"></a><a href="#Footnote_57_57" class="fnanchor">[57]</a> and only a brief reunion; and Edom, recently -the willing and natural ally of Moab, was not likely to -fight very zealously for Judah, which had reduced her -to vassalage. So the Moabites said to one another,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_36" id="Page_36">[Pg 36]</a></span> -as they pointed to the unexpected apparition of those -red pools: "This is blood. The kings are surely -destroyed, and they have smitten each man his fellow. -Moab to the spoil!" They rushed down tumultuously -on the camp of Israel, and found the soldiers of -Jehoram ready to receive them. Taken by surprise, -for they had expected no resistance, they were hurled -back in utter confusion and with immense slaughter. -The three kings pushed their advantage to the utmost. -They went forward into the land, driving and smiting -the Moabites before them, and ruthlessly carrying out -the command attributed to Elisha. They beat down -the cities—most of which in a land of flocks and herds -were little more than pastoral villages; they rendered -the green fields useless with stones; they filled up all -the wells with earth; they felled every fruit-bearing -tree of any value. At last only one stronghold, Kir-haraseth, -the chief fenced town of Moab, held out -against them.<a name="FNanchor_58_58" id="FNanchor_58_58"></a><a href="#Footnote_58_58" class="fnanchor">[58]</a> Even this fortress was sore bested. -The slingers, for which Israel, and specially the tribe -of Benjamin, was so famous, advanced to drive its -defenders from the battlements. King Mesha fought -with undaunted heroism. He decided to take the -seven hundred warriors who were left to him, and -cut his way through the besieging host to the king -of Edom. He thought that even now he might persuade -the Edomites to abandon this new and unnatural -alliance, and turn the battle against their common<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_37" id="Page_37">[Pg 37]</a></span> -enemies. But the numbers against him were too -strong, and he found the plan impossible. Then he -formed a dreadful resolution, dictated to him by the -extremity of his despair. His inscription at Karcha -shows that he was a profound and even fanatical -believer in Chemosh, his god. Chemosh could still -deliver him. If Chemosh was, as Mesha says in his -inscription, "angry with his land"—if, even for a time, -he allowed his faithful people and his devoted king to -be afflicted—it could not be for any lack of power on -his part, but only because they had in some way -offended him, so that he was wroth, or because he had -gone on a journey, or was asleep, or deaf.<a name="FNanchor_59_59" id="FNanchor_59_59"></a><a href="#Footnote_59_59" class="fnanchor">[59]</a> How could -he be appeased? Only by the offering of the most -precious of all the king's possessions; only by the -self-devotion of the crown-prince, on whom were -centred all the nation's hopes. Mesha would force -Chemosh to help him for very shame. He would -offer to Chemosh a human sacrifice, the sacrifice of -his eldest son that should have reigned in his stead. -Doubtless the young prince gave himself up as a willing -offering, for that was essential to the holocaust being -valid and acceptable.<a name="FNanchor_60_60" id="FNanchor_60_60"></a><a href="#Footnote_60_60" class="fnanchor">[60]</a></p> - -<p>So upon the wall of Kir-haraseth, in the sight of all -the Moabites, and of the three invading armies, the -brave and desperate hero of a hundred fights, who -had inflicted so many reverses upon these enemies, and -received so many at their hands, but who, having -liberated his country, now saw all the efforts of his life -ruined at one blow—took his eldest son, kindled the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_38" id="Page_38">[Pg 38]</a></span> -sacrificial fire, and then and there solemnly offered that -horrible burnt-offering.<a name="FNanchor_61_61" id="FNanchor_61_61"></a><a href="#Footnote_61_61" class="fnanchor">[61]</a></p> - -<p>And it proved effectual, though far otherwise than -Mesha had expected. He was delivered; and, doubtless, -if ever he reared, at Kirharaseth or elsewhere, -another memorial stone, he would have attributed his -deliverance to his national god. But here, in the annals -of Elisha, the result is hurried over, and a veil is, so -to speak, dropped upon the dreadful scene with the one -ambiguous expression, "And there was great wrath -against Israel: and they departed from him, and -returned to their own land."</p> - -<p>The phrase awakens but does not satisfy our curiosity. -We are not certain of the translation, or of the meaning. -It may be, as in the margin of the Revised Version, -"there came great wrath upon Israel."<a name="FNanchor_62_62" id="FNanchor_62_62"></a><a href="#Footnote_62_62" class="fnanchor">[62]</a> But wrath -from whom? and on what account? The word -"wrath" all but invariably denotes divine wrath; but -we cannot imagine (as some critics do) that any Israelite -of the schools of the prophets would sanction the -notion that the chosen people were allowed to suffer -from the kindled wrath of Chemosh. Can we then -suppose that the desperate act of King Mesha was a -proof that Israel, who was no doubt the most interested -and the most remorseless of the invaders, had pressed -the Moabites too hard, and carried his vengeance much -too far? That is by no means impossible. The -prophet Amos denounces upon Moab in after years<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_39" id="Page_39">[Pg 39]</a></span> -the doom that fire should devour the palaces of Kirioth, -and that Moab should perish with shoutings, and all -his royal line be cut off, for the far less offence of having -burned into lime the bones of the king of Edom.<a name="FNanchor_63_63" id="FNanchor_63_63"></a><a href="#Footnote_63_63" class="fnanchor">[63]</a> The -command of Elisha did not exempt the Israelites from -their share of moral responsibility. Jehu was commissioned -to be an executioner of vengeance upon the -house of Ahab. Yet Jehu is expressly condemned by -the prophet Hosea for the tiger-like ferocity and -horrible thoroughness with which he had carried out -his destined work.<a name="FNanchor_64_64" id="FNanchor_64_64"></a><a href="#Footnote_64_64" class="fnanchor">[64]</a> Only one other explanation is -possible. If "wrath" here has the unusual sense of -human indignation, the clause can only imply that the -armies of Judah and Edom were roused to anger by -the unpitying spirit which Israel had displayed. The -horrible tragedy enacted upon the wall of Kirharaseth -awoke their consciences to the sense of human compassion. -These, after all, were fellow-men—fellow-men -of kindred blood to their own—whom they had driven -to straits so frightful as to cause a king to burn his -own heir alive as a mute appeal to his god in the hour -of overwhelming ruin. They had done enough:</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Sunt lacrim rerum et mentem mortalia tangunt."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>They hastily broke up the league, dissolved the alliance, -returned horror-stricken to their own land. They left -Moab indeed in possession of his last fortress, but they -had reduced his territory to a wilderness before they -retired and called it peace.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_40" id="Page_40">[Pg 40]</a></span></p> - - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_V" id="CHAPTER_V">CHAPTER V</a></h2> - -<h3><i>ELISHA'S MIRACLES</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> iv. 1-44</h4> - - -<p>We are now in the full tide of Elisha's miracles, -and as regards many of them we can do little -more than illustrate the text as it stands. The record -of them clearly comes from some account prevalent in -the schools of the prophets, which is however only -fragmentary, and has been unchronologically pieced -into the annals of the kings of Israel.</p> - -<p>The story of Elisha abounds far more in the supernatural -than that of Elijah, and is believed by most -critics to be of earlier date. Yet the scenes and portents -of his life are almost wholly lacking in the element of -grandeur which belong to those of the elder seer. His -personality, if on the whole softer and more beneficent, -inspires less of awe, and the whole tone of the -biography which recorded these isolated incidents is -lacking in the poetic and impassioned elevation which -marks the episodes of Elijah's history. We see in the -records of Elisha, as in the biographies—so rich in -prodigies—of fourth-century hermits and medival -saints, how little impressive in itself is the exercise of -abnormal powers; how it derives its sole grandeur from -the accompaniment of great moral lessons and spiritual -revelations. John the Baptist "did no miracle," yet<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_41" id="Page_41">[Pg 41]</a></span> -our Lord placed him not only far above Elisha, but -even above Moses and Samuel and Elijah, when He -said of him, "Verily I say unto you, of them that -have been born of women there hath not risen a greater -than John the Baptist."</p> - -<p>It is impossible not to be struck with the singular -parallelism between the powers exercised by Elisha -and those which are attributed to his predecessor. -"How true an heir is Elisha of his master," says -Bishop Hall, "not in his graces only, but in his -actions! Both of them divided the waters of Jordan, -the one as his last act, the other as his first. Elijah's -curse was the death of the captains and their troops; -Elisha's curse was the death of the children. Elijah -rebuked Ahab to his face; Elisha, Jehoram. Elijah -supplied the drought of Israel by rain from heaven; -Elisha supplied the drought of the three kings by -waters gushing out of the earth; Elijah increased the -oil of the Sareptan, Elisha increased the oil of the -prophet's widow; Elijah raised from death the Sareptan's -son, Elisha the Shunammite's; both of them had -one mantle, one spirit; both of them climbed up one -Carmel, one heaven." The resemblance, however, is -not at all in character, but only in external and miraculous -circumstances. In all other respects Elisha -furnishes a contrast to Elijah which startles us quite -as much as any superficial resemblances. Elijah was -a free, wild Bedawy prophet, hating and shunning as -his ordinary residence the abodes of men, making his -home in the rocky wady or in the mountain glades, -appearing and disappearing suddenly as the wind. He -asserted his power most often in ministries of retribution. -Clad in the sheepskin of a Gadite shepherd or -mountaineer, he was not one of those who wear soft<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_42" id="Page_42">[Pg 42]</a></span> -clothing or are found in kings' houses. He usually met -monarchs as their enemy and their reprover, but for -the most part avoided them. He never intervened for -years together even in national events of the utmost -importance, whether military or religious, unless he -received the direct call of God, or there appeared to -him to be a "<i>dignus Vindice nodus</i>." Elisha, on the -other hand, makes his home in cities, and chiefly in -Samaria. He is familiar with kings and moves about -with armies, and has no long retirements into unknown -solitudes; and though he could speak roughly to -Jehoram, he is often on the friendliest terms with him -and with other sovereigns.</p> - -<p>The stories of Elisha give us many interesting -glimpses into the social life of Israel in his day. As -to their literal historic accuracy, those must make -positive affirmation who feel that they can do so in -accordance alike with adequate authority and with the -sacredness of truth. Many will be unable to escape -the opinion that they bear some resemblance to other -Jewish haggadoth, written for edification, with every -innocent intention, in the schools of the Prophets, but -no more intended for perfectly literal acceptance in all -their details than the Life of St. Paul the Hermit, by -St. Jerome; or that of St. Antony, attributed erroneously -to St. Athanasius; or that of St. Francis in the -Fioretti; or the lives of humble saints of the people -called <i>Kisar-el-anbiah</i>, which are so popular among poor -Mohammedans. Into that question there is no need to -enter further. <i>Abundet quisque in sensu suo.</i></p> - -<p>I. On one occasion a widow of one of the Sons of -the Prophets—for these communities, though cœnobitic, -were not celibate—came to him in deep distress. Her -husband—the Jews, with their usual guesswork, most<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_43" id="Page_43">[Pg 43]</a></span> -improbably identify him with Obadiah, the chamberlain -of Ahab<a name="FNanchor_65_65" id="FNanchor_65_65"></a><a href="#Footnote_65_65" class="fnanchor">[65]</a>—had died insolvent. As she had nothing to -pay, her creditor under the grim provision of the law -was about to exercise his right of selling her two sons -into slavery to recoup himself for the debt.<a name="FNanchor_66_66" id="FNanchor_66_66"></a><a href="#Footnote_66_66" class="fnanchor">[66]</a> Would -Elisha help her?</p> - -<p>Prophets were never men of wealth, so that he could -not pay her debt. He asked her what she possessed -to satisfy the demand. "Nothing," she said, "but a -pot of the common oil, used for anointing the body -after a bath."</p> - -<p>Elisha bade her go and borrow from her neighbours -all the empty vessels she could, then to return home, -shut the door, and pour the oil into the vessels.</p> - -<p>She did so. They were all filled, and she asked her -son to bring yet another. But there was not another -to be had, so she went out and told the Man of God. -He bade her sell the miraculously multiplied oil to pay -the debt, and live with her sons on the proceeds of -what was over.</p> - -<p>II. We next find Elisha at Shunem, famous as the -abode of the fair maiden—probably Abishag, the nurse -of David's decrepitude—who is the heroine of the Song -of Songs. It is a village, now called Solam, on the -slopes of Little Hermon (Jebel-el-Duhy), three miles -north of Jezreel. At this place there lived a lady of -wealth and influence, whose husband owned the surrounding -land. There were but few khans in Palestine, -and even where they now exist the traveller has in -most cases to supply his own food. Elisha, in his -journeys to and fro among the schools of the Prophets,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_44" id="Page_44">[Pg 44]</a></span> -had often enjoyed the welcome hospitality eagerly -pressed upon him by the lady of Shunem. Struck -with his sacred character, she persuaded her husband -to take a step unusual even to the boundless hospitality -of the East. She begged him to do honour to this -holy Man of God by building for him a little chamber -(<i>alyah</i>) on the flat roof of the house, to which he might -have easy and private access by the outside staircase.<a name="FNanchor_67_67" id="FNanchor_67_67"></a><a href="#Footnote_67_67" class="fnanchor">[67]</a> -The chamber was built, and furnished, like any other -simple Eastern room, with a bed, a divan to sit on, a -table, and a lamp; and there the weary prophet on his -journeys often found a peaceful, simple, and delightful -resting-place.</p> - -<p>Grateful for the reverence with which she treated -him, and the kind care with which she had supplied -his needs, Elisha was anxious to recompense her in -whatever way might be possible. The thought of -money payment was of course out of the question: -merely to hint at it would have been a breach of -manners. But perhaps he might be of use to her in -some other way. At this time, and for years afterwards -during his long ministry of perhaps fifty-six years, he -was attended by a servant named Gehazi, who stood -to him in the same sort of relation which he had held -to Elijah. He told Gehazi to summon the Shunammite -lady. In the deep humility of Eastern womanhood she -came and stood in his presence. Even then he did -not address her. So downtrodden was the position -of women in the East that any dignified person, much -more a great prophet, could not converse with a -woman without compromising his dignity. The more<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_45" id="Page_45">[Pg 45]</a></span> -scrupulous Pharisees in the days of Christ always -carefully gathered up their garments in the streets, lest -they should so much as touch a woman with their -skirts in passing by, as the modern Chakams in -Jerusalem do to this day.<a name="FNanchor_68_68" id="FNanchor_68_68"></a><a href="#Footnote_68_68" class="fnanchor">[68]</a> The disciples themselves, -sophisticated by familiarity with such teachers, were -astonished that Jesus at the well of Shechem should -talk with a woman.<a name="FNanchor_69_69" id="FNanchor_69_69"></a><a href="#Footnote_69_69" class="fnanchor">[69]</a> So, though the lady stood there, -Elisha, instead of speaking to her directly, told Gehazi -to thank her for all the devout respect and care, all -'the modesty of fearful duty,'<a name="FNanchor_70_70" id="FNanchor_70_70"></a><a href="#Footnote_70_70" class="fnanchor">[70]</a> which she had displayed -towards them, and to ask her if he should say a good -word for her to the King or the Captain of the Host. -This is just the sort of favour which an Eastern would -be likely to value most.<a name="FNanchor_71_71" id="FNanchor_71_71"></a><a href="#Footnote_71_71" class="fnanchor">[71]</a> The Shunammite, however, -was well provided for; she had nothing to complain -of, and nothing to request. She thanked Elisha for -his kindly proposal, but declined it, and went away.</p> - -<p>"Is there, then, nothing which we can do for her?" -asked Elisha of Gehazi.<a name="FNanchor_72_72" id="FNanchor_72_72"></a><a href="#Footnote_72_72" class="fnanchor">[72]</a></p> - -<p>There was. Gehazi had learnt that the sorrow of -her life—a sorrow and a source of reproach to any -Eastern household, but most of all to that of a wealthy -householder—was her childlessness.</p> - -<p>"Call her," he said.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_46" id="Page_46">[Pg 46]</a></span></p> - -<p>She came back, and stood reverently in the doorway. -"When the time comes round," he said to her, "you -shall embrace a son."</p> - -<p>The promise raised in her heart a thrill of joy. It -was too precious to be believed. "Nay," she said -"my lord, thou Man of God, do not lie unto thine -handmaid."</p> - -<p>But the promise was fulfilled, and the lady of Shunem -became the happy mother of a son.</p> - -<p>III. The charming episode then passes over some -years. The child had grown into a little boy, old -enough now to go out alone to see his father in the -harvest fields and to run about among the reapers. -But as he played about in the heat he had a sunstroke, -and cried to his father, "O my head, my head!" Not -knowing how serious the matter was, his father simply -ordered one of his lads to carry the child home to his -mother. The fond mother nursed him tenderly upon -her knees, but at noon he died.</p> - -<p>Then the lady of Shunem showed all the faith and -strength and wisdom of her character. "The good -Shunammite," says Bishop Hall, "had lost her son; her -faith she lost not." Overwhelming as was this calamity—the -loss of an only child—she suppressed all her -emotions, and, instead of bursting into the wild helpless -wail of Eastern mourners, or rushing to her husband -with the agonising news, she took the little boy's body -in her arms, carried it up to the chamber which had -been built for Elisha, and laid it upon his bed. Then, -shutting the door, she called to her husband to send to -her one of his reapers and one of the asses, for she -was going quickly to the Man of God and would return -in the cool of the evening. "Why should you go -to-day particularly?" he asked. "It is neither new<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_47" id="Page_47">[Pg 47]</a></span> -moon, nor sabbath." "It is all right," she said;<a name="FNanchor_73_73" id="FNanchor_73_73"></a><a href="#Footnote_73_73" class="fnanchor">[73]</a> and -with perfect confidence in the rectitude of all her -purposes, he sent her the she-ass, and a servant to -drive it and to run beside it for her protection on the -journey of sixteen miles.</p> - -<p>"Drive on the ass," she said. "Slacken me not the -riding unless I tell you." So with all possible speed -she made her way—a journey of several hours—from -Shunem to Mount Carmel.</p> - -<p>Elisha, from his retreat on the hill, marked her -coming from a distance, and it rendered him anxious. -"Here comes the Shunammite," he said to Gehazi. -"Run to meet her, and ask Is it well with thee? is it -well with thy husband? is it well with the child?"</p> - -<p>"All well," she answered, for her message was not -to Gehazi, and she could not trust her voice to speak; -but pressing on up-hillwards, she flung herself before -Elisha and grasped his feet. Displeased at the -familiarity which dared thus to clasp the feet of his -master, Gehazi ran up to thrust her away by force, -but Elisha interfered. "Let her alone," he cried; "she -is in deep affliction, and Jehovah has not revealed to -me the cause." Then her long pent-up emotion burst -forth. "Did I desire a son of my lord?" she cried. -"Did I not say do not deceive me?"</p> - -<p>It was enough—though she seemed unable to bring -out the dreadful words that her boy was dead. Catching -her meaning, Elisha said to Gehazi, "Gird up thy -loins, take my staff, and without so much as stopping -to salute any one, or to return a salutation,<a name="FNanchor_74_74" id="FNanchor_74_74"></a><a href="#Footnote_74_74" class="fnanchor">[74]</a> lay my -staff on the dead child's face." But the broken-hearted<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_48" id="Page_48">[Pg 48]</a></span> -mother refused to leave Elisha. She imagined that the -servant, the staff, might be severed from Elisha; but -she knew that wherever the prophet was, there was -power. So Elisha arose and followed her, and on the -way Gehazi met them with the news that the child -lay still and dead, with the fruitless staff upon his face.</p> - -<p>Then Elisha in deep anguish went up to the chamber -and shut the door, and saw the boy's body lying pale -upon his bed. After earnest prayer he outstretched -himself over the little corpse, as Elijah had done at -Zarephath. Soon it began to grow warm with returning -life, and Elisha, after pacing up and down the room, -once more stretched himself over him. Then the child -opened his eyes and sneezed seven times, and Elisha -called to Gehazi to summon the mother.</p> - -<p>"Take up thy son," he said. She prostrated herself -at his feet in speechless gratitude, and took up her -recovered child, and went.</p> - -<p>IV. We next find Elisha at Gilgal, in the time of the -famine of which we read his prediction in a later -chapter.<a name="FNanchor_75_75" id="FNanchor_75_75"></a><a href="#Footnote_75_75" class="fnanchor">[75]</a> The sons of the prophets were seated round -him, listening to his instructions; the hour came for -their simple meal, and he ordered the great pot to be -put on the fire for the vegetable soup, on which, with -bread, they chiefly lived. One of them went out for -herbs, and carelessly brought his outer garment (the -<i>abeyah</i>)<a name="FNanchor_76_76" id="FNanchor_76_76"></a><a href="#Footnote_76_76" class="fnanchor">[76]</a> full of wild poisonous coloquinths,<a name="FNanchor_77_77" id="FNanchor_77_77"></a><a href="#Footnote_77_77" class="fnanchor">[77]</a> which, by -ignorance or inadvertence, were shred into the pottage. -But when it was cooked and poured out they perceived<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_49" id="Page_49">[Pg 49]</a></span> -the poisonous taste, and cried out, "O Man of God, -death in the pot!"</p> - -<p>"Bring meal," he said, for he seems always to have -been a man of the fewest words.</p> - -<p>They cast in some meal, and were all able to eat of -the now harmless pottage. It has been noticed that in -this, as in other incidents of the story, there is no -invocation of the name of Jehovah.</p> - -<p>V. Not far from Gilgal was the little village of -Baalshalisha,<a name="FNanchor_78_78" id="FNanchor_78_78"></a><a href="#Footnote_78_78" class="fnanchor">[78]</a> at which lived a farmer who wished to -bring an offering of firstfruits and <i>karmel</i> (bruised -grain) in his wallet to Elisha as a Man of God.<a name="FNanchor_79_79" id="FNanchor_79_79"></a><a href="#Footnote_79_79" class="fnanchor">[79]</a> It -was a poor gift enough—only twenty of the coarse -barley loaves which were eaten by the common people, -and a sack<a name="FNanchor_80_80" id="FNanchor_80_80"></a><a href="#Footnote_80_80" class="fnanchor">[80]</a> full of fresh ears of corn.<a name="FNanchor_81_81" id="FNanchor_81_81"></a><a href="#Footnote_81_81" class="fnanchor">[81]</a> Elisha told his -servitor<a name="FNanchor_82_82" id="FNanchor_82_82"></a><a href="#Footnote_82_82" class="fnanchor">[82]</a>—perhaps Gehazi—to set them before the people -present. "What?" he asked, "this trifle of food -before a hundred men!" But Elisha told him in the -Lord's name that it should more than suffice; and so -it did.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_50" id="Page_50">[Pg 50]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_VI" id="CHAPTER_VI">CHAPTER VI</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE STORY OF NAAMAN</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> v. 1-27</h4> - -<p class="center"><span class="smcap">Matt.</span> viii. 3: Θέλω, καθαρίσθητι</p> - - -<p>After these shorter anecdotes we have the longer -episode of Naaman.<a name="FNanchor_83_83" id="FNanchor_83_83"></a><a href="#Footnote_83_83" class="fnanchor">[83]</a></p> - -<p>A part of the misery inflicted by the Syrians on -Israel was caused by the forays in which their light-armed -bands, very much like the borderers on the -marches of Wales or Scotland, descended upon the -country and carried off plunder and captives before -they could be pursued.</p> - -<p>In one of these raids they had seized a little -Israelitish girl and sold her to be a slave. She had -been purchased for the household of Naaman, the -captain of the Syrian host, who had helped his king and -nation to win important victories either against Israel or -against Assyria. Ancient Jewish tradition identified him -with the man who had "drawn his bow at a venture" -and slain King Ahab. But all Naaman's valour and -rank and fame, and the honour felt for him by his king, -were valueless to him, for he was suffering from the -horrible affliction of leprosy. Lepers do not seem to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_51" id="Page_51">[Pg 51]</a></span> -have been segregated in other countries so strictly as -they were in Israel, or at any rate Naaman's leprosy -was not of so severe a form as to incapacitate him from -his public functions.</p> - -<p>But it was evident that he was a man who had won -the affection of all who knew him; and the little slave -girl who waited on his wife breathed to her a passionate -wish that Naaman could visit the Man of God in -Samaria, for he would recover him from his leprosy. -The saying was repeated, and one of Naaman's friends -mentioned it to the king of Syria. Benhadad was -so much struck by it that he instantly determined to -send a letter, with a truly royal gift to the king of -Israel, who could, he supposed, as a matter of course, -command the services of the prophet. The letter came -to Jehoram with a stupendous present of ingots of -silver to the value of ten talents, and six thousand -pieces of gold, and ten changes of raiment.<a name="FNanchor_84_84" id="FNanchor_84_84"></a><a href="#Footnote_84_84" class="fnanchor">[84]</a> After the -ordinary salutations, and a mention of the gifts, the -letter continued "And now, when this letter is come -to thee, behold I have sent Naaman my servant, that -thou mayest recover him of his leprosy."</p> - -<p>Jehoram lived in perpetual terror of his powerful -and encroaching neighbour. Nothing was said in the -letter about the Man of God; and the king rent his -clothes, exclaiming that he was not God to kill and to -make alive, and that this must be a base pretext for -a quarrel. It never so much as occurred to him, as -it certainly would have done to Jehoshaphat, that the -prophet, who was so widely known and honoured, -and whose mission had been so clearly attested in the -invasion of Moab, might at least help him to face this<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_52" id="Page_52">[Pg 52]</a></span> -problem. Otherwise the difficulty might indeed seem -insuperable, for leprosy was universally regarded as an -incurable disease.</p> - -<p>But Elisha was not afraid: he boldly told Jehoram -to send the Syrian captain to him. Naaman, with his -horses and his chariots, in all the splendour of a royal -ambassador, drove up to the humble house of the -prophet. Being so great a man, he expected a deferential -reception, and looked for the performance of -his cure in some striking and dramatic manner. "The -prophet," so he said to himself, "will come out, and -solemnly invoke the name of his God Jehovah, and -wave his hand over the leprous limbs, and so work -the miracle."<a name="FNanchor_85_85" id="FNanchor_85_85"></a><a href="#Footnote_85_85" class="fnanchor">[85]</a></p> - -<p>But the servant of the King of kings was not exultantly -impressed, as false prophets so often are, by -earthly greatness. Elisha did not even pay him the -compliment of coming out of the house to meet him. -He wished to efface himself completely, and to fix the -leper's thoughts on the one truth that if healing was -granted to him, it was due to the gift of God, not to -the thaumaturgy or arts of man. He simply sent out -his servant to the Syrian commander-in-chief with the -brief message, "Go and wash in Jordan seven times, -and be thou clean."</p> - -<p>Naaman, accustomed to the extreme deference of -many dependants, was not only offended, but enraged, -by what he regarded as the scant courtesy and procrastinated -boon of the prophet. Why was he not -received as a man of the highest distinction? What -necessity could there be for sending him all the way -to the Jordan? And why was he bidden to wash in -that wretched, useless, tortuous stream, rather than in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_53" id="Page_53">[Pg 53]</a></span> -the pure and flowing waters of his own native Abanah -and Pharpar?<a name="FNanchor_86_86" id="FNanchor_86_86"></a><a href="#Footnote_86_86" class="fnanchor">[86]</a> How was he to tell that this "Man -of God" did not design to mock him by sending him -on a fool's errand, so that he would come back as a -laughing-stock both to the Israelites and to his own -people? Perhaps he had not felt any great faith in -the prophet, to begin with; but whatever he once felt -had now vanished. He turned and went away in a -rage.</p> - -<p>But in this crisis the affection of his friends and -servants stood him in good stead. Addressing him, in -their love and pity, by the unusual term of honour -"my father," they urged upon him that, as he certainly -would not have refused some <i>great</i> test, there was no -reason why he should refuse this simple and humble -one.</p> - -<p>He was won over by their reasonings, and descending -the hot steep valley of the Jordan, bathed himself -in the river seven times. God healed him, and, as -Elisha had promised, "his flesh," corroded by leprosy, -"came again like the flesh of a little child, and he was -clean."</p> - -<p>This healing of Naaman is alluded to by our Lord -to illustrate the truth that the love of God extended -farther than the limits of the chosen race; that His -Fatherhood is co-extensive with the whole family of -man.</p> - -<p>It is difficult to conceive the transport of a man -cured of this most loathsome and humiliating of all -earthly afflictions. Naaman, who seems to have possessed -"a mind naturally Christian," was filled with -gratitude. Unlike the thankless Jewish lepers whom -Christ cured as He left Engannim, this alien returned<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_54" id="Page_54">[Pg 54]</a></span> -to give glory to God. Once more the whole imposing -cavalcade rode through the streets of Samaria, and -stopped at Elisha's door. This time Naaman was -admitted into his presence. He saw, and no doubt -Elisha had strongly impressed on him the truth, that -his healing was the work not of man but of God; and -as he had found no help in the deities of Syria, he -confessed that the God of Israel was the only true God -among those of the nations. In token of his thankfulness -he presses Elisha, as God's instrument in the -unspeakable mercy which has been granted to him, to -accept "a blessing" (<i>i.e.</i>, a present) from him—"from -thy servant," as he humbly styled himself.</p> - -<p>Elisha was no greedy Balaam. It was essential that -Naaman and the Syrians should not look on him as on -some vulgar sorcerer who wrought wonders for "the -rewards of divination." His wants were so simple that -he stood above temptation. His desires and treasures -were not on earth. To put an end to all importunity, -he appealed to Jehovah with his usual solemn formula—"As -the Lord liveth before whom I stand, I will receive -no present."<a name="FNanchor_87_87" id="FNanchor_87_87"></a><a href="#Footnote_87_87" class="fnanchor">[87]</a></p> - -<p>Still more deeply impressed by the prophet's incorruptible -superiority to so much as a suspicion of low -motives, Naaman asked that he might receive two -mules' burden of earth wherewith to build an altar to -the God of Israel of His own sacred soil.<a name="FNanchor_88_88" id="FNanchor_88_88"></a><a href="#Footnote_88_88" class="fnanchor">[88]</a> The very<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_55" id="Page_55">[Pg 55]</a></span> -soil ruled by such a God must, he thought, be holier -than other soil; and he wished to take it back to -Syria, just as the people of Pisa rejoiced to fill their -Campo Santo with mould from the Holy Land, and -just as mothers like to baptize their children in water -brought home from the Jordan. Henceforth, said -Naaman, I will offer burnt-offering and sacrifice to no -God but unto Jehovah. Yet there was one difficulty -in the way. When the King of Syria went to worship -in the temple of his god Rimmon it was the duty of -Naaman to accompany him.<a name="FNanchor_89_89" id="FNanchor_89_89"></a><a href="#Footnote_89_89" class="fnanchor">[89]</a> The king leaned on his -hand, and when he bowed before the idol it was -Naaman's duty to bow also. He begged that for this -concession God would pardon him.</p> - -<p>Elisha's answer was perhaps different from what -Elijah might have given. He practically allowed -Naaman to give this sign of outward compliance with -idolatry, by saying to him, "Go in peace." It is from -this circumstance that the phrase "to bow in the house -of Rimmon" has become proverbial to indicate a -dangerous and dishonest compromise. But Elisha's -permission must not be misunderstood. He did but -hand over this semi-heathen convert to the grace of -God. It must be remembered that he lived in days -long preceding the conviction that proselytism is a part -of true religion; in days when the thought of missions -to heathen lands was utterly unknown. The position -of Naaman was wholly different from that of any<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_56" id="Page_56">[Pg 56]</a></span> -Israelite. He was only the convert, or the half-convert -of a day, and though he acknowledged the supremacy -of Jehovah as alone worthy of his worship, he probably -shared in the belief—common even in Israel—that there -were other gods, local gods, gods of the nations, to -whom Jehovah might have divided the limits of their -power.<a name="FNanchor_90_90" id="FNanchor_90_90"></a><a href="#Footnote_90_90" class="fnanchor">[90]</a> To demand of one who, like Naaman, had -been an idolater all his days, the sudden abandonment -of every custom and tradition of his life, would have -been to demand from him an unreasonable, and, in his -circumstances, useless and all but impossible self-sacrifice. -The best way was to let him feel and see -for himself the futility of Rimmon-worship. If he -were not frightened back from his sudden faith in -Jehovah, the scruple of conscience which he already -felt in making his request might naturally grow within -him and lead him to all that was best and highest. -The temporary condonation of an imperfection might -be a wise step towards the ultimate realisation of a truth. -We cannot at all blame Elisha, if, with such knowledge -as he then possessed, he took a mercifully tolerant view -of the exigencies of Naaman's position. The bowing -in the house of Rimmon under such conditions probably -seemed to him no more than an act of outward respect -to the king and to the national religion in a case where -no evil results could follow from Naaman's example.<a name="FNanchor_91_91" id="FNanchor_91_91"></a><a href="#Footnote_91_91" class="fnanchor">[91]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_57" id="Page_57">[Pg 57]</a></span></p> - -<p>But the general principle that <i>we</i> must <i>not</i> bow in -the house of Rimmon remains unchanged. The light -and knowledge vouchsafed to us far transcend those -which existed in times when men had not seen the -days of the Son of Man. The only rule which sincere -Christians can follow is to have no truce with Canaan, -no halting between two opinions, no tampering, no -compliance, no connivance, no complicity with evil,—even -no tolerance of evil as far as their own conduct -is concerned. No good man, in the light of the Gospel -dispensation, could condone himself in seeming to -sanction—still less in doing—anything which in his -opinion ought not to be done, or in saying anything -which implied his own acquiescence in things which he -knows to be evil. "Sir," said a parishioner to one -of the non-juring clergy: "there is many a man who has -made a great gash in his conscience; cannot you make a -little nick in yours?" No! a <i>little</i> nick is, in one sense, -as fatal as a great gash. It is an abandonment of <i>the -principle</i>; it is a violation of the Law. The wrong of -it consists in this—that all evil begins, not in the commission -of great crimes, but in the slight divergence -from right rules. The angle made by two lines may be -infinitesimally small, but produce the lines and it may -require infinitude to span the separation between the -lines which inclose so tiny an angle. The wise man -gave the only true rule about wrong-doing, when he -said, "Enter not into the path of the wicked and go not -in the way of evil men. Avoid it, pass not by it, turn<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_58" id="Page_58">[Pg 58]</a></span> -from it and pass away."<a name="FNanchor_92_92" id="FNanchor_92_92"></a><a href="#Footnote_92_92" class="fnanchor">[92]</a> And the reason for his rule -is that the beginning of sin—like the beginning of -strife—"is as when one letteth out water."<a name="FNanchor_93_93" id="FNanchor_93_93"></a><a href="#Footnote_93_93" class="fnanchor">[93]</a></p> - -<p>The proper answer to all abuses of any supposed -concession to the lawfulness of bowing in the house -of Rimmon—if that be interpreted to mean the doing -of anything which our consciences cannot wholly approve—is -<i>Obsta principiis</i>—avoid the beginnings of evil.</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"We are not worst at once; the course of evil<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Begins so slowly, and from such slight source,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">An infant's hand might stem the breach with clay;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">But let the stream grow wider, and philosophy,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Age, and religion too, may strive in vain<br /></span> -<span class="i1">To stem the headstrong current."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>The mean cupidity of Gehazi, the servant of Elisha, -gives a deplorable sequel to the story of the prophet's -magnanimity. This man's wretched greed did its -utmost to nullify the good influence of his master's -example. There may be more wicked acts recorded -in Scripture than that of Gehazi, but there is scarcely -one which shows so paltry a disposition.</p> - -<p>He had heard the conversation between his master -and the Syrian marshal, and his cunning heart despised -as a futile sentimentality the magnanimity which had -refused an eagerly proffered reward. Naaman was -rich: he had received a priceless boon; it would be -rather a pleasure to him than otherwise to return for -it some acknowledgment which he would not miss. -Had he not even seemed a little hurt by Elisha's refusal -to receive it? What possible harm could there be in -taking what he was anxious to give? And how useful -those magnificent presents would be, and to what -excellent uses could they be put! He could not -approve of the fantastic and unpractical scrupulosity<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_59" id="Page_59">[Pg 59]</a></span> -which had led Elisha to refuse the "blessing" which -he had so richly earned. Such attitudes of unworldliness -seemed entirely foolish to Gehazi.</p> - -<p>So pleaded the Judas-spirit within the man. By -such specious delusions he inflamed his own covetousness, -and fostered the evil temptation which had taken -sudden and powerful hold upon his heart, until it took -shape in a wicked resolve.</p> - -<p>The mischief of Elisha's quixotic refusal was done, -but it could be speedily undone, and no one would be -the worse. The evil spirit was whispering to Gehazi:—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Be mine and Sin's for one short hour; and then<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Be all thy life the happiest man of men."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>"Behold," he said, with some contempt both for -Elisha and for Naaman, "my master hath let off this -Naaman the Syrian; but as the Lord liveth I will run -after him, and take somewhat of him."</p> - -<p>"As the Lord liveth!" It had been a favourite -appeal of Elijah and Elisha, and the use of it by -Gehazi shows how utterly meaningless and how very -dangerous such solemn words become when they are -degraded into formul.<a name="FNanchor_94_94" id="FNanchor_94_94"></a><a href="#Footnote_94_94" class="fnanchor">[94]</a> It is thus that the habit of -swearing begins. The light use of holy words very -soon leads to their utter degradation. How keen is -the satire in Cowper's little story:—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"A Persian, humble servant of the sun,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Who, though devout, yet bigotry had none,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Hearing a lawyer, grave in his address,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">With adjurations every word impress,—<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Supposed the man a bishop, or, at least,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">God's Name so often on his lips—a priest.<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Bowed at the close with all his gracious airs,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">And begged an interest in his frequent prayers!"<br /></span> -</div></div> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_60" id="Page_60">[Pg 60]</a></span></p> -<p>Had Gehazi felt their true meaning—had he realised -that on Elisha's lips they meant something infinitely -more real than on his own, he would not have forgotten -that in Elisha's answer to Naaman they had all the -validity of an oath, and that he was inflicting on his -master a shameful wrong, when he led Naaman to -believe that, after so sacred an adjuration, the prophet -had frivolously changed his mind.</p> - -<p>Gehazi had not very far to run,<a name="FNanchor_95_95" id="FNanchor_95_95"></a><a href="#Footnote_95_95" class="fnanchor">[95]</a> for in a country -full of hills, and of which the roads are rough, horses -and chariots advance but slowly. Naaman, chancing -to glance backwards, saw the prophet's attendant -running after him. Anticipating that he must be the -bearer of some message from Elisha, he not only halted -the cavalcade, but sprang down from his chariot,<a name="FNanchor_96_96" id="FNanchor_96_96"></a><a href="#Footnote_96_96" class="fnanchor">[96]</a> and -went to meet him with the anxious question, "Is all -well?"</p> - -<p>"Well," answered Gehazi; and then had ready his -cunning lie. "Two youths," he said, "of the prophetic -schools had just unexpectedly come to his master from -the hill country of Ephraim; and though he would -accept nothing for himself, Elisha would be glad if -Naaman would spare him two changes of garments, -and one talent of silver for these poor members of a -sacred calling."<a name="FNanchor_97_97" id="FNanchor_97_97"></a><a href="#Footnote_97_97" class="fnanchor">[97]</a></p> - -<p>Naaman must have been a little more or a little less -than human if he did not feel a touch of disappointment -on hearing this message. The gift was nothing to him.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_61" id="Page_61">[Pg 61]</a></span> -It was a delight to him to give it, if only to lighten -a little the burden of gratitude which he felt towards -his benefactor. But if he had felt elevated by the -magnanimous example of Elisha's disinterestedness, he -must have thought that this hasty request pointed to -a little regret on the prophet's part for his noble self-denial. -After all, then, even prophets were but men, -and gold after all was gold! The change of mind -about the gift brought Elisha a little nearer the ordinary -level of humanity, and, so far, it acted as a sort of -disenchantment from the high ideal exhibited by his -former refusal. And so Naaman said, with alacrity, -"Be content: take two talents."</p> - -<p>The fact that Gehazi's conduct thus inevitably compromised -his master, and undid the effects of his -example, is part of the measure of the man's apostacy. -It showed how false and hypocritical was his position, -how unworthy he was to be the ministering servant of -a prophet. Elisha was evidently deceived in the man -altogether. The heinousness of his guilt lies in the -words <i>Corruptio optimi pessima</i>. When religion is used -for a cloak of covetousness, of usurping ambition, of -secret immorality, it becomes deadlier than infidelity. -Men raze the sanctuary, and build their idol temples -on the hallowed ground. They cover their base -encroachments and impure designs with the "cloke -of profession, doubly lined with the fox-fur of hypocrisy," -and hide the leprosy which is breaking out upon their -foreheads with the golden <i>petalon</i> on which is inscribed -the title of "holiness to the Lord."</p> - -<p>At first Gehazi did not like to take so large a sum -as two talents; but the crime was already committed, -and there was not much more harm done in taking two -talents than in taking one. Naaman urged him, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_62" id="Page_62">[Pg 62]</a></span> -it is very improbable that, unless the chances of detection -weighed with him, he needed much urging. So -the Syrian weighed out silver ingots to the amount of -two talents, and putting them in two satchels laid them -on two of his servants and told them to carry the money -before Gehazi to Elisha's house. But Gehazi had to -keep a look-out lest his nefarious dealings should be -observed, and when they came to Ophel—the word -means the foot of the hill of Samaria, or some part -of the fortifications<a name="FNanchor_98_98" id="FNanchor_98_98"></a><a href="#Footnote_98_98" class="fnanchor">[98]</a>—he took the bags from the two -Syrians, dismissed them, and carried the money to -some place where he could conceal it in the house. -Then, as though nothing had happened, with his usual -smooth face of sanctimonious integrity, the pious Jesuit -went and stood before his master.</p> - -<p>He had not been unnoticed! His heart must have -sunk within him when there smote upon his ear Elisha's -question,—</p> - -<p>"Whence comest thou, Gehazi?"</p> - -<p>But one lie is as easy as another, and Gehazi was -doubtless an adept at lying.</p> - -<p>"Thy servant went no whither," he replied, with an -air of innocent surprise.</p> - -<p>"<i>Went not</i> my beloved one?"<a name="FNanchor_99_99" id="FNanchor_99_99"></a><a href="#Footnote_99_99" class="fnanchor">[99]</a> said Elisha—and he -must have said it with a groan, as he thought how -utterly unworthy the youth, whom he thus called "my -loving heart" or "my dear friend,"—"when the man -turned from his chariot to meet thee?" It may be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_63" id="Page_63">[Pg 63]</a></span> -that from the hill of Samaria Elisha had seen it all, or -that he had been told by one who had seen it. If not, he -had been rightly led to read the secret of his servant's -guilt. "Is it a time," he asked, "to act thus?" Did -not my example show thee that there was a high object -in refusing this Syrian's gifts, and in leading him to -feel that the servants of Jehovah do His bidding with -no afterthought of sordid considerations? Are there -not enough troubles about us actual and impending, -to show that this is no time for the accumulation of -earthly treasures? Is it a time to receive money—and -all that money will procure? to receive garments, -and olive-yards and vineyards, and oxen, and men-servants -and maid-servants? Has a prophet no higher -aim than the accumulation of earthly goods, and are his -needs such as earthly goods can supply? And hast -thou, the daily friend and attendant of a prophet, learnt -so little from his precepts and his example?</p> - -<p>Then followed the tremendous penalty for so grievous -a transgression—a transgression made up of meanness, -irreverence, greed, cheating, treachery, and lies.</p> - -<p>"The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto -thee, and unto thy seed for ever!" "Oh heavy talents -of Gehazi!" exclaims Bishop Hall: "Oh the horror -of the one unchangeable suit! How much better had -been a light purse and a homely coat, with a sound -body and a clean soul!"</p> - -<p>"And he went out from his presence a leper as white -as snow."<a name="FNanchor_100_100" id="FNanchor_100_100"></a><a href="#Footnote_100_100" class="fnanchor">[100]</a></p> - -<p>It is the characteristic of the leprous taint in the -system to be thus suddenly developed, and apparently -in crises of sudden and overpowering emotion it might -affect the whole blood. And one of the many morals<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_64" id="Page_64">[Pg 64]</a></span> -which lie in Gehazi's story is again that moral to which -the world's whole experience sets its seal—that though -the guilty soul may sell itself for a desired price, the -sum-total of that price is nought. It is Achan's ingots -buried under the sod on which stood his tent. It is -Naboth's vineyard made abhorrent to Ahab on the day -he entered it. It is the thirty pieces of silver which -Judas dashed with a shriek upon the Temple floor. It -is Gehazi's leprosy for which no silver talents or changes -of raiment could atone.</p> - -<p>The story of Gehazi—of the son of the prophets who -would naturally have succeeded Elisha as Elisha had -succeeded Elijah—must have had a tremendous significance -to warn the members of the prophetic schools -from the peril of covetousness. That peril, as all -history proves to us, is one from which popes and -priests, monks, and even nominally ascetic and nominally -pauper communities, have never been exempt;—to -which, it may even be said, that they have been -peculiarly liable. Mercenariness and falsity, displayed -under the pretence of religion, were never more overwhelmingly -rebuked. Yet, as the Rabbis said, it would -have been better if Elisha, in repelling with the left -hand, had also drawn with the right.<a name="FNanchor_101_101" id="FNanchor_101_101"></a><a href="#Footnote_101_101" class="fnanchor">[101]</a></p> - -<hr class="tb" /> - -<p>The fine story of Elisha and Naaman, and the fall -and punishment of Gehazi, is followed by one of the -anecdotes of the prophet's life which appears to our -unsophisticated, perhaps to our imperfectly enlightened -judgment, to rise but little above the ecclesiastical -portents related in medival hagiologies.</p> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_65" id="Page_65">[Pg 65]</a></span></p> -<p>At some unnamed place—perhaps Jericho—the house -of the Sons of the Prophets had become too small for -their numbers and requirements, and they asked Elisha's -leave to go down to the Jordan and cut beams to make -a new residence. Elisha gave them leave, and at their -request consented to go with them. While they were -hewing, the axe-head of one of them fell into the water, -and he cried out, "Alas! master, it was borrowed!" -Elisha ascertained where it had fallen. He then cut -down a stick,<a name="FNanchor_102_102" id="FNanchor_102_102"></a><a href="#Footnote_102_102" class="fnanchor">[102]</a> and cast it on the spot, and the iron -swam and the man recovered it.</p> - -<p>The story is perhaps an imaginative reproduction of -some unwonted incident. At any rate, we have no -sufficient evidence to prove that it may not be so. It -is wholly unlike the economy invariably shown in the -Scripture narratives which tell us of the exercise of -supernatural power. All the eternal laws of nature -are here superseded at a word, as though it were an -every-day matter, without even any recorded invocation -of Jehovah, to restore an axe-head, which could -obviously have been recovered or resupplied in some -much less stupendous way than by making iron swim -on the surface of a swift-flowing river. It is easy to -invent conventional and <i> priori</i> apologies to show that -religion demands the unquestioning acceptance of this -prodigy, and that a man must be shockingly wicked who -does not feel certain that it happened exactly in the -literal sense; but whether the doubt or the defence be -morally worthier, is a thing which God alone can judge.<a name="FNanchor_103_103" id="FNanchor_103_103"></a><a href="#Footnote_103_103" class="fnanchor">[103]</a></p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_66" id="Page_66">[Pg 66]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_VII" id="CHAPTER_VII">CHAPTER VII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>ELISHA AND THE SYRIANS</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> vi. 1-23</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"Now there was found in the city a poor wise man, and he by his -wisdom delivered the city."—<span class="smcap">Eccles.</span> ix. 15.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>Elisha, unlike his master Elijah, was, during a -great part of his long career, intimately mixed -up with the political and military fortunes of his country. -The king of Israel who occurs in the following narratives -is left nameless—always the sign of later and -more vague tradition; but he has usually been identified -with Jehoram ben-Ahab, and, though not without some -misgivings, we shall assume that the identification is -correct. His dealings with Elisha never seem to have -been very cordial, though on one occasion he calls him -"my father." The relations between them at times -became strained and even stormy.</p> - -<p>His reign was rendered miserable by the incessant -infestation of Syrian marauders. In these difficulties -he was greatly helped by Elisha. The prophet -repeatedly frustrated the designs of the Syrian king -by revealing to Jehoram the places of Benhadad's -ambuscades, so that Jehoram could change the destination -of his hunting parties or other movements, and -escape the plots laid to seize his person. Benhadad, -finding himself thus frustrated, and suspecting that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_67" id="Page_67">[Pg 67]</a></span> -it was due to treachery, called his servants together -in grief and indignation, and asked who was the -traitor among them. His officers assured him that -they were all faithful, but that the secrets whispered -in his bed-chamber were revealed to Jehoram by Elisha -the prophet in Israel, whose fame had spread into -Syria, perhaps because of the cure of Naaman. The -king, unable to take any step while his counsels were -thus published to his enemies, thought—not very consistently—that -he could surprise and seize Elisha -himself, and sent to find out where he was. At that -time he was living in Dothan, about twelve miles north-east -of Samaria,<a name="FNanchor_104_104" id="FNanchor_104_104"></a><a href="#Footnote_104_104" class="fnanchor">[104]</a> and Benhadad sent a contingent with -horses and chariots by night to surround the city, and -prevent any escape from its gates. That he could thus -besiege a town so near the capital shows the helplessness -to which Israel had been now reduced.</p> - -<p>When Elisha's servitor rose in the morning he was -terrified to see the Syrians encamped round the city, -and cried to Elisha, "Alas! my master, what shall we -do?"</p> - -<p>"Fear not," said the prophet: "they that be with -us are more than they that be with them." He -prayed God to grant the youth the same open eyes, -the same spiritual vision which he himself enjoyed; and -the youth saw the mountain full of horses and chariots -of fire round about Elisha.</p> - -<p>This incident has been full of comfort to millions, -as a beautiful illustration of the truth that—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"The hosts of God encamp around<br /></span> -<span class="i3">The dwellings of the just;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Deliverance He affords to all<br /></span><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_68" id="Page_68">[Pg 68]</a></span> -<span class="i3">Who on His promise trust.<br /></span> -</div><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Oh, make but trial of His love,<br /></span> -<span class="i3">Experience will decide,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">How blest are they, and only they,<br /></span> -<span class="i3">Who in His truth confide."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>The youth's affectionate alarm had not been shared -by his master. He knew that to every true servant -of God the promise will be fulfilled, "He shall defend -thee under His wings; thou shalt be safe under His -feathers; His righteousness and truth shall be thy -shield and buckler."<a name="FNanchor_105_105" id="FNanchor_105_105"></a><a href="#Footnote_105_105" class="fnanchor">[105]</a></p> - -<p>Were our eyes similarly opened, we too should see -the reality of the Divine protection and providence, -whether under the visible form of angelic ministrants -or not. Scripture in general, and the Psalms in -particular, are full of the serenity inspired by this -conviction. The story of Elisha is a picture-commentary -on the Psalmist's words: "The angel of the -Lord encampeth round them that fear Him, and -delivereth them."<a name="FNanchor_106_106" id="FNanchor_106_106"></a><a href="#Footnote_106_106" class="fnanchor">[106]</a> "He shall give His angels charge -over thee, to keep thee in all thy ways."<a name="FNanchor_107_107" id="FNanchor_107_107"></a><a href="#Footnote_107_107" class="fnanchor">[107]</a> "And I -will encamp about Mine house because of the army, -because of him that passeth by, and because of him -that returneth: and no oppressor shall pass through -them any more: for now have I seen with Mine eyes."<a name="FNanchor_108_108" id="FNanchor_108_108"></a><a href="#Footnote_108_108" class="fnanchor">[108]</a> -"The angel of His presence saved them: in His love -and in His pity He redeemed them; and He bare them, -and carried them all the days of old."<a name="FNanchor_109_109" id="FNanchor_109_109"></a><a href="#Footnote_109_109" class="fnanchor">[109]</a></p> - -<p>But what is the exact meaning of all these lovely -promises? They do not mean that God's children and -saints will always be shielded from anguish or defeat, -from the triumph of their enemies, or even from apparently -hopeless and final failure, or miserable death.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_69" id="Page_69">[Pg 69]</a></span> -The lesson is not that their persons shall be inviolable, -or that the enemies who advance against them to eat -up their flesh shall always stumble and fall. The -experiences of tens of thousands of troubled lives and -martyred ends instantly prove the futility of any such -reading of these assurances. The saints of God, the -prophets of God, have died in exile and in prison, have -been tortured on the rack and broken on the wheel, -and burnt to ashes at innumerable stakes; they have -been destitute, afflicted, tormented, in their lives—stoned, -beheaded, sawn asunder, in every form of hideous death; -they have rotted in miry dungeons, have starved on -desolate shores, have sighed out their souls into the -agonising flame. The Cross of Christ stands as the -emblem and the explanation of their lives, which fools -count to be madness, and their end without honour. -On earth they have, far more often than not, been -crushed by the hatred and been delivered over to the -will of their enemies. Where, then, have been those -horses and chariots of fire?</p> - -<p>They have been there no less than around Elisha -at Dothan. The eyes spiritually opened have seen -them, even when the sword flashed, or the flames -wrapped them in indescribable torment. The sense -of God's protection has least deserted His saints -when to the world's eyes they seemed to have been -most utterly abandoned. There has been a joy in -prisons and at stakes, it has been said, far exceeding -the joy of harvest. "Pray for me," said a poor boy -of fifteen, who was being burned at Smithfield in the -fierce days of Mary Tudor. "I would as soon pray -for a dog as for a heretic like thee," answered one of -the spectators. "Then, Son of God, shine Thou upon -me!" cried the boy-martyr; and instantly, upon a dull<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_70" id="Page_70">[Pg 70]</a></span> -and cloudy day, the sun shone out, and bathed his -young face in glory; whereat, says the martyrologist, -men greatly marvelled. But is there one death-bed of -a saint on which that glory has not shone?</p> - -<p>The presence of those horses and chariots of fire, -unseen by the carnal eye—the promises which, if they -be taken literally, all experience seems to frustrate—mean -two things, which they who are the heirs of such -promises, and who would without them be of all men -most miserable, have clearly understood.</p> - -<p>They mean, first, that as long as a child of God is -on the path of duty, and until that duty has been -fulfilled, he is inviolable and invulnerable. He shall -tread upon the lion and the adder; the young lion and -the dragon shall he trample under his feet. He shall -take up the serpent in his hands; and if he drink any -deadly thing, it shall not hurt him. He shall not be -afraid of the terror by night, nor of the arrow that -flieth by day; of the pestilence that walketh in darkness, -nor of the demon that destroyeth in the noonday. -A thousand shall fall at his right hand, and ten thousand -beside him; but it shall not come nigh him. The -histories and the legends of numberless marvellous -deliverances all confirm the truth that, when a man -fears the Lord, He will keep him in all his ways, and -give His angels charge over him, lest at any time he -dash his foot against a stone. God will not permit -any mortal force, or any combination of forces, to -hinder the accomplishment of the task entrusted to -His servant. It is the sense of this truth which, under -circumstances however menacing, should enable us to</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i24">"bate no jot<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Of heart or hope, but still bear up, and steer<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Uphillward"<br /></span> -</div></div> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_71" id="Page_71">[Pg 71]</a></span></p> -<p>It is this conviction which has nerved men to face -insuperable difficulties, and achieve impossible and -unhoped-for ends. It works in the spirit of the cry, -"Who art thou, O great mountain? Before Zerubbabel -be thou changed into a plain!" It inspires the faith -as a grain of mustard seed which is able to say to this -mountain, "Be thou removed, and be thou cast into -the sea,"—and it shall obey. It stands unmoved upon -the pinnacle of the Temple whereon it has been -placed, while the enemy and the tempter, smitten by -amazement, falls. In the hour of difficulty it can cry,—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Rescue me, O Lord, in this mine evil hour,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">As of old so many by Thy mighty power,—<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Enoch and Elias from the common doom;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Noe from the waters in a saving home;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Abraham from the abounding guilt of heathenesse;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Job from all his multiform and fell distress;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Isaac when his faither's knife was raised to slay;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Lot from burning Sodom on the judgment day;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Moses from the land of bondage and despair;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Daniel from the hungry lions in their lair;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">And the children three amid the furnace flame;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Chaste Susanna from the slander and the shame;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">David from Golia, and the wrath of Saul;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">And the two Apostles from their prison-thrall."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>The strangeness, the unexpectedness, the apparently -inadequate source of the deliverance, have deepened the -trust that it has not been due to accident. Once, when -Felix of Nola was flying from his enemies, he took -refuge in a cave, and he had scarcely entered it before -a spider began to spin its web over the fissure. The -pursuer, passing by, saw the spider's web, and did not -look into the cave; and the saint, as he came out into -safety, remarked: "<i>Ubi Deus est, ibi aranea murus, ubi -non est ibi murus aranea</i>" ("Where God is, a spider's<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_72" id="Page_72">[Pg 72]</a></span> -web is as a wall; where He is not, a wall is but as a -spider's web").</p> - -<p>This is one lesson conveyed in the words of Christ -when the Pharisees told Him that Herod desired to -kill Him. He knew that Herod could not kill Him -till He had done His Father's will and finished His -work. "Go ye," He said, "and tell this fox, Behold, I -cast out devils, and I do cures to-day and to-morrow, -and the third day I shall be perfected. Nevertheless, -I must walk to-day, and to-morrow, and the day -following."</p> - -<p>But had all this been otherwise—had Felix been -seized by his pursuers and perished, as has been the -common lot of God's prophets and heroes—he would -not therefore have felt himself mocked by these exceeding -great and precious promises. The chariots and -horses of fire are still there, and are there to work a -deliverance yet greater and more eternal. Their office -is not to deliver the perishing body, but to carry into -God's glory the immortal soul. This is indicated in -the death-scene of Elijah. This was the vision of the -dying Stephen. This was what Christian legend meant -when it embellished with beautiful incidents such scenes -as the death of Polycarp. This was what led Bunyan -to write, when he describes the death of Christian, -that "all the trumpets sounded for him on the other -side." When poor Captain Allan Gardiner lay starving -to death in that Antarctic isle with his wretched companions, -he yet painted on the entrance of the cave -which had sheltered them, and near to which his -remains were found, a hand pointing downward at -the words, "Though He slay me, yet will I put my -trust in Him."</p> - -<p>There was a touch of almost joyful humour in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_73" id="Page_73">[Pg 73]</a></span> -way in which Elisha proceeded to use, in the present -emergency, the power of Divine deliverance. He seems -to have gone out of the town and down the hill to the -Syrian captains,<a name="FNanchor_110_110" id="FNanchor_110_110"></a><a href="#Footnote_110_110" class="fnanchor">[110]</a> and prayed God to send them illusion -(ἀβλεψία), so that they might be misled.<a name="FNanchor_111_111" id="FNanchor_111_111"></a><a href="#Footnote_111_111" class="fnanchor">[111]</a> Then he -boldly said to them, "You are being deceived: you -have come the wrong way, and to the wrong city. I -will take you to the man whom ye seek." The incident -reminds us of the story of Athanasius, who, when he -was being pursued on the Nile, took the opportunity -of a bend of the river boldly to turn back his boat -towards Alexandria. "Do you know where Athanasius -is?" shouted the pursuers. "He is not far off!" -answered the disguised Archbishop; and the emissaries -of Constantius went on in the opposite direction from -that in which he made his escape.</p> - -<p>Elisha led the Syrians in their delusion straight into -the city of Samaria, where they suddenly found themselves -at the mercy of the king and his troops. Delighted -at so great a chance of vengeance, Jehoram eagerly -exclaimed, "My father, shall I smite, shall I smite?"</p> - -<p>Certainly the request cannot be regarded as unnatural, -when we remember that in the Book of -Deuteronomy, which did not come to light till after this -period, we read the rule that, when the Israelites had -taken a besieged city, "thou shalt smite every male -thereof with the edge of the sword";<a name="FNanchor_112_112" id="FNanchor_112_112"></a><a href="#Footnote_112_112" class="fnanchor">[112]</a> and that when -Israel defeated the Midianites<a name="FNanchor_113_113" id="FNanchor_113_113"></a><a href="#Footnote_113_113" class="fnanchor">[113]</a> they slew all the males,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_74" id="Page_74">[Pg 74]</a></span> -and Moses was wroth with the officers of the host -because they had not also slain all the women. He -then (as we are told) ordered them to slay all except -the virgins, and also—horrible to relate—"<i>every male -among the little ones</i>." The spirit of Elisha on this -occasion was larger and more merciful. It almost rose -to the spirit of Him who said, "It was said to them of -old time, Thou shalt love thy neighbour and hate thine -enemy; but I say unto you, Love your enemies; -forgive them that hate you; do good unto them that -despitefully use you and persecute you." He asked -Jehoram reproachfully whether he would even have -smitten those whom he had taken captive with sword -and bow.<a name="FNanchor_114_114" id="FNanchor_114_114"></a><a href="#Footnote_114_114" class="fnanchor">[114]</a> He not only bade the king to spare them, -but to set food before them, and send them home. -Jehoram did so at great expense, and the narrative -ends by telling us that the example of such merciful -generosity produced so favourable an impression that -"the bands of Syria came no more into the land of -Israel."</p> - -<p>It is difficult, however, to see where this statement -can be chronologically fitted in. The very next chapter—so -loosely is the compilation put together, so completely -is the sequence of events here neglected—begins -with telling us that Benhadad with all his host went -up and besieged Samaria. Any peace or respite gained -by Elisha's compassionate magnanimity must, in any -case, have been exceedingly short-lived. Josephus -tries to get over the difficulty by drawing a sufficiently -futile distinction between marauding bands and a -direct invasion,<a name="FNanchor_115_115" id="FNanchor_115_115"></a><a href="#Footnote_115_115" class="fnanchor">[115]</a> and he says that King Benhadad gave -up his frays through <i>fear</i> of Elisha. But, in the first<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_75" id="Page_75">[Pg 75]</a></span> -place, the encompassing of Dothan had been carried out -by "<i>a great host</i> with horses and chariots," which is -hardly consistent with the notion of a foray, though it -creates new difficulties as to the numbers whom Elisha -led to Samaria; secondly, the substitution of a direct -invasion for predatory incursions would have been no -gain to Israel, but a more deadly peril; and, thirdly, -if it was fear of Elisha which stopped the king's raids, -it is strange that it had no effect in preventing his -invasions. We have, however, no data for any final -solution of these problems, and it is useless to meet -them with a network of idle conjectures. Such difficulties -naturally occur in narratives so vague and -unchronological as those presented to us in the documents -from the story of Elisha which the compiler -wove into his history of Israel and Judah.<a name="FNanchor_116_116" id="FNanchor_116_116"></a><a href="#Footnote_116_116" class="fnanchor">[116]</a></p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_76" id="Page_76">[Pg 76]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_VIII" id="CHAPTER_VIII">CHAPTER VIII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE FAMINE AND THE SIEGE</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> vi. 24-vii. 20</h4> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"'Tis truly no good plan when princes play</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">The vulture among carrion; but when</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">They play the carrion among vultures—that</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">Is ten times worse."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 14.5em;"><span class="smcap">Lessing</span>, <i>Nathan the Wise</i>, Act I., Sc. 3.</span><br /> -</p> - -<p>If the Benhadad, King of Syria, who reduced Samaria -to the horrible straits recorded in this chapter, -(2 Kings vi.) was the same Benhadad whom Ahab -had treated with such impolitic confidence, his hatred -against Israel must indeed have burned hotly. Besides -the affair at Dothan, he had already been twice routed -with enormous slaughter, and against those disasters -he could only set the death of Ahab at Ramoth-Gilead. -It is obvious from the preceding narrative that he could -advance at any time at his will and pleasure into the -heart of his enemy's country, and shut him up in his -capital almost without resistance. The siege-trains of -ancient days were very inefficient, and any strong -fortress could hold out for years, if only it was well -provisioned. Such was not the case with Samaria, and -it was reduced to a condition of sore famine. Food so -loathsome as an ass's head, which at other times the -poorest would have spurned, was now sold for eighty -shekels' weight of silver (about 8); and the fourth part<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_77" id="Page_77">[Pg 77]</a></span> -of a <i>xestes</i> or <i>kab</i>—which was itself the smallest dry-measure, -the sixth part of a <i>seah</i>—of the coarse, -common pulse, or roasted chick-peas, vulgarly known -as "dove's dung," fetched five shekels (about 12<i>s.</i> 6<i>d.</i>).<a name="FNanchor_117_117" id="FNanchor_117_117"></a><a href="#Footnote_117_117" class="fnanchor">[117]</a></p> - -<p>While things were at this awful pass, "the King of -Israel," as he is vaguely called throughout this story, -went his rounds upon the wall to visit the sentries and -encourage the soldiers in their defence. As he passed, -a woman cried, "Help, my lord, O king!" In Eastern -monarchies the king is a judge of the humblest; a -suppliant, however mean, may cry to him. Jehoram -thought that this was but one of the appeals which -sprang from the clamorous mendicity of famine with -which he had grown so painfully familiar. "The Lord -curse you!" he exclaimed impatiently.<a name="FNanchor_118_118" id="FNanchor_118_118"></a><a href="#Footnote_118_118" class="fnanchor">[118]</a> "How can I -help you? Every barn-floor is bare, every wine-press -drained." And he passed on.</p> - -<p>But the woman continued her wild clamour, and -turning round at her importunity, he asked, "What -aileth thee?"</p> - -<p>He heard in reply a narrative as appalling as ever -smote the ear of a king in a besieged city. Among -the curses denounced upon apostate Israel in the -Pentateuch, we read, "Ye shall eat the flesh of -your sons, and the flesh of your daughters shall ye -eat";<a name="FNanchor_119_119" id="FNanchor_119_119"></a><a href="#Footnote_119_119" class="fnanchor">[119]</a> or, as it is expressed more fully in the Book<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_78" id="Page_78">[Pg 78]</a></span> -of Deuteronomy, "He shall besiege thee in all thy -gates throughout all thy land.... And thou shalt eat the -fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and thy -daughters, which the Lord thy God hath given thee, -in the siege, and in the straitness wherewith thine -enemies shall distress thee: so that the man that is -tender among you, and very delicate, his eye shall be -evil towards his brother, and towards the wife of his -bosom, and towards the remnant of his children which -he shall leave; so that he shall not give to any of them -of the flesh of his children whom he shall eat, because -he hath nothing left him in the siege.... The tender and -delicate woman, which would not adventure to set the -sole of her foot upon the ground for delicateness and -tenderness, her eye shall be evil towards the husband -of her bosom, and towards her son, and towards her -daughter, and towards her children: for she shall eat -them for want of all things secretly in the siege and -the straitness, if thou wilt not observe to do all the -words of the law, ... that thou mayest fear the glorious -and fearful name, <i>The Lord thy God</i>."<a name="FNanchor_120_120" id="FNanchor_120_120"></a><a href="#Footnote_120_120" class="fnanchor">[120]</a> We find almost -the same words in the prophet Jeremiah;<a name="FNanchor_121_121" id="FNanchor_121_121"></a><a href="#Footnote_121_121" class="fnanchor">[121]</a> and in -Lamentations we read: "The hands of the pitiful -women have sodden their own children: they were their -meat in the destruction of the daughter of My people."<a name="FNanchor_122_122" id="FNanchor_122_122"></a><a href="#Footnote_122_122" class="fnanchor">[122]</a></p> - -<p>Isaiah asks, "Can a woman forget her sucking child, -that she should not have compassion on the son of her -womb?" Alas! it has always been so in those awful -scenes of famine, whether after shipwreck or in beleaguered -cities, when man becomes degraded to an -animal, with all an animal's primitive instincts, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_79" id="Page_79">[Pg 79]</a></span> -when the wild beast appears under the thin veneer of -civilisation. So it was at the siege of Jerusalem, and -at the siege of Magdeburg, and at the wreck of the -<i>Medusa</i>, and on many another occasion when the pangs -of hunger have corroded away every vestige of the -tender affections and of the moral sense.</p> - -<p>And this had occurred at Samaria: her women had -become cannibals and devoured their own little ones.</p> - -<p>"This woman," screamed the suppliant, pointing her -lean finger at a wretch like herself—"this woman said -unto me, 'Give thy son, that we may eat him to-day, -and we will afterwards eat my son.' I yielded to her -suggestion. We killed my little son, and ate his flesh -when we had sodden it. Next day I said to her, 'Now -give thy son, that we may eat him'; and she hath hid -her son!"</p> - -<p>How could the king answer such a horrible appeal? -Injustice had been done; but was he to order and to -sanction by way of redress fresh cannibalism, and the -murder by its mother of another babe? In that foul -obliteration of every natural instinct, what could he do, -what could any man do? Can there be equity among -raging wild beasts, when they roar for their prey and -are unfed?</p> - -<p>All that the miserable king could do was to rend his -clothes in horror and to pass on, and as his starving -subjects passed by him on the wall they saw that he -wore sackcloth beneath his purple, in sign, if not of -repentance, yet of anguish, if not of prayer, yet of -uttermost humiliation.<a name="FNanchor_123_123" id="FNanchor_123_123"></a><a href="#Footnote_123_123" class="fnanchor">[123]</a></p> - -<p>But if indeed he had, in his misery, donned that -sackcloth in order that at least the semblance of self-mortification -might move Jehovah to pity, as it had<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_80" id="Page_80">[Pg 80]</a></span> -done in the case of his father Ahab, the external sign -of his humility had done nothing to change his heart. -The gruesome appeal to which he had just been forced -to listen only kindled him to a burst of fury<a name="FNanchor_124_124" id="FNanchor_124_124"></a><a href="#Footnote_124_124" class="fnanchor">[124]</a>.The -man who had warned, who had prophesied, who so far -during this siege had not raised his finger to help—the -man who was believed to be able to wield the -powers of heaven, and had wrought no deliverance for -his people, but suffered them to sink unaided into these -depths of abjectness—should he be permitted to live? -If Jehovah would not help, of what use was Elisha? -"God do so to me, and more also," exclaimed Jehoram—using -his mother's oath to Elijah<a name="FNanchor_125_125" id="FNanchor_125_125"></a><a href="#Footnote_125_125" class="fnanchor">[125]</a>—"if the head of -Elisha, the son of Shaphat, shall stand on him this -day."</p> - -<p>Was this the king who had come to Elisha with -such humble entreaty, when three armies were perishing -of thirst before the eyes of Moab? Was this the king -who had called Elisha "my father," when the prophet -had led the deluded host of Syrians into Samaria, and -bidden Jehoram to set large provision before them? -It was the same king, but now transported with fury -and reduced to despair. His threat against God's -prophet was in reality a defiance of God, as when our -unhappy Plantagenet, Henry II., maddened by the loss -of Le Mans, exclaimed that, since God had robbed him -of the town he loved, he would pay God out by robbing -Him of that which He most loved in him—his soul.</p> - -<p>Jehoram's threat was meant in grim earnest, and he -sent an executioner to carry it out. Elisha was sitting -in his house with the elders of the city, who had come<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_81" id="Page_81">[Pg 81]</a></span> -to him for counsel at this hour of supreme need. He -knew what was intended for him, and it had also -been revealed to him that the king would follow his -messenger to cancel his sanguinary threat. "See ye," -he said to the elders, "how this son of a murderer"—for -again he indicates his contempt and indignation for -the son of Ahab and Jezebel—"hath sent to behead -me! When he comes, shut the door, and hold it fast -against him. His master is following hard at his -heels."</p> - -<p>The messenger came, and was refused admittance. -The king followed him,<a name="FNanchor_126_126" id="FNanchor_126_126"></a><a href="#Footnote_126_126" class="fnanchor">[126]</a> and entering the room where -the prophet and elders sat, he gave up his wicked -design of slaying Elisha with the sword, but he overwhelmed -him with reproaches, and in despair renounced -all further trust in Jehovah. Elisha, as the king's -words imply, must have refused all permission to -capitulate: he must have held out from the first a -promise that God would send deliverance. But no -deliverance had come. The people were starving. -Women were devouring their babes. Nothing worse -could happen if they flung open their gates to the -Syrian host. "Behold," the king said, "this evil is -Jehovah's doing. You have deceived us. Jehovah -does not intend to deliver us. Why should I wait for -Him any longer?" Perhaps the king meant to imply -that his mother's Baal was better worth serving, and -would never have left his votaries to sink into these -straits.</p> - -<p>And now man's extremity had come, and it was -God's opportunity. Elisha at last was permitted to -announce that the worst was over, that the next day<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_82" id="Page_82">[Pg 82]</a></span> -plenty should smile on the besieged city. "Thus saith -the Lord," he exclaimed to the exhausted and despondent -king, "To-morrow about this time, instead of an ass's -head being sold for eighty shekels, and a thimbleful -of pulse for five shekels, a peck of fine flour shall be -sold for a shekel, and two pecks of barley for a shekel, -in the gate of Samaria."</p> - -<p>The king was leaning on the hand of his chief -officer, and to this soldier the promise seemed not -only incredible, but silly: for at the best he could -only suppose that the Syrian host would raise the -siege; and though to hope for that looked an absurdity, -yet even that would not in the least fulfil the immense -prediction. He answered, therefore, in utter scorn: -"Yes! Jehovah is making windows in heaven! But -even thus could this be?" It is much as if he should -have answered some solemn pledge with a derisive -proverb such as, "Yes! if the sky should fall, we -should catch larks!"</p> - -<p>Such contemptuous repudiation of a Divine promise -was a blasphemy; and answering scorn with scorn, and -riddle with riddling, Elisha answers the mocker, "Yes! -and <i>you</i> shall see this, but shall not enjoy it."</p> - -<p>The word of the Lord was the word of a true -prophet, and the miracle was wrought. Not only was -the siege raised, but the wholly unforeseen spoil of the -entire Syrian camp, with all its accumulated rapine, -brought about the predicted plenty.</p> - -<p>There were four lepers<a name="FNanchor_127_127" id="FNanchor_127_127"></a><a href="#Footnote_127_127" class="fnanchor">[127]</a> outside the gate of Samaria, -like the leprous mendicants who gather there to this -day. They were cut off from all human society, except -their own. Leprosy was treated as contagious, and -if "houses of the unfortunate" (<i>Biut-el-Maskin</i>) were<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_83" id="Page_83">[Pg 83]</a></span> -provided for them, as seems to have been the case at -Jerusalem, they were built outside the city walls.<a name="FNanchor_128_128" id="FNanchor_128_128"></a><a href="#Footnote_128_128" class="fnanchor">[128]</a> They -could only live by beggary, and this was an aggravation -of their miserable condition. And how could any -one fling food to these beggars over the walls, when -food of any kind was barely to be had within them?</p> - -<p>So taking counsel of their despair, they decided that -they would desert to the Syrians: among them they -would at least find food, if their lives were spared; -and if not, death would be a happy release from their -present misery.</p> - -<p>So in the evening twilight, when they could not be -seen or shot at from the city wall as deserters, they -stole down to the Syrian camp.</p> - -<p>When they reached its outermost circle, to their -amazement all was silence. They crept into one of -the tents in fear and astonishment. There was food -and drink there, and they satisfied the cravings of -their hunger. It was also stored with booty from the -plundered cities and villages of Israel. To this they -helped themselves, and took it away and hid it. Having -spoiled this tent, they entered a second. It was likewise -deserted, and they carried a fresh store of treasures -to their hiding-place. And then they began to -feel uneasy at not divulging to their starving fellow-citizens -the strange and golden tidings of a deserted -camp. The night was wearing on; day would reveal -the secret. If they carried the good news, they would -doubtless earn a rich guerdon. If they waited till -morning, they might be put to death for their selfish -reticence and theft. It was safest to return to the city, -and rouse the warder, and send a message to the -palace. So the lepers hurried back through the night,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_84" id="Page_84">[Pg 84]</a></span> -and shouted to the sentinel at the gate, "We went -to the Syrian camp, and it was deserted! Not a man -was there, not a sound was to be heard. The horses -were tethered there, and the asses, and the tents were -left just as they were."</p> - -<p>The sentinel called the other watchmen to hear the -wonderful news, and instantly ran with it to the palace. -The slumbering house was roused; and though it was -still night, the king himself arose. But he could not -shake off his despondency, and made no reference to -Elisha's prediction. News sometimes sounds too good -to be true. "It is only a decoy," he said. "They -can only have left their camp to lure us into an -ambuscade, that they may return, and slaughter us, -and capture our city."</p> - -<p>"Send to see," answered one of his courtiers. -"Send five horsemen to test the truth, and to look -out. If they perish, their fate is but the fate of us all."</p> - -<p>So two chariots with horses were despatched, with -instructions not only to visit the camp, but track the -movements of the host.</p> - -<p>They went, and found that it was as the lepers had -said. The camp was deserted, and lay there as an -immense booty; and for some reason the Syrians had -fled towards the Jordan to make good their escape to -Damascus by the eastern bank. The whole road was -strewn with the traces of their headlong flight; it was -full of scattered garments and vessels.</p> - -<p>Probably, too, the messengers came across some -disabled fugitive, and learnt the secret of this amazing -stampede. It was the result of one of those sudden -unaccountable panics to which the huge, unwieldy, -heterogeneous Eastern armies, which have no organised -system of sentries, and no trained discipline, are constantly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_85" id="Page_85">[Pg 85]</a></span> -liable. We have already met with several -instances in the history of Israel. Such was the panic -which seized the Midianites when Gideon's three -hundred blew their trumpets; and the panic of the -Syrians before Ahab's pages of the provinces; and of -the combined armies in the Valley of Salt; and of the -Moabites at Wady-el-Ahsy; and afterwards of the -Assyrians before the walls of Jerusalem. Fear is -physically contagious, and, when once it has set in, -it swells with such unaccountable violence, that the -Greeks called these terrors "panic," because they -believed them to be directly inspired by the god Pan. -Well-disciplined as was the army of the Ten Thousand -Greeks in their famous retreat, they nearly fell victims -to a sudden panic, had not Clearchus, with prompt -resource, published by the herald the proclamation -of a reward for the arrest of the man who had let -the ass loose. Such an unaccountable terror—caused -by a noise as of chariots and of horses which reverberated -among the hills—had seized the Syrian host. -They thought that Jehoram had secretly hired an army -of the princes of the Khetas<a name="FNanchor_129_129" id="FNanchor_129_129"></a><a href="#Footnote_129_129" class="fnanchor">[129]</a> and of the Egyptians -to march suddenly upon them. In wild confusion, not -stopping to reason or to inquire, they took to flight, -increasing their panic by the noise and rush of their -own precipitance.</p> - -<p>No sooner had the messengers delivered their glad -tidings, than the people of Samaria began to pour -tumultuously out of the gates, to fling themselves on the -food and on the spoil. It was like the rush of the dirty, -starving, emaciated wretches which horrified the keepers<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_86" id="Page_86">[Pg 86]</a></span> -of the reserved stores at Smolensk in Napoleon's retreat -from Moscow, and forced them to shut the gates, and -fling food and grain to the struggling soldiers out of the -windows of the granaries. To secure order and prevent -disaster, the king appointed his attendant lord to keep -the gate. But the torrent of people flung him down, -and they trampled on his body in their eagerness for -relief. He died after having seen that the promise -of Elisha was fulfilled, and that the cheapness and -abundance had been granted, the prophecy of which he -thought only fit for his sceptical derision.</p> - -<p>"The sudden panic which delivered the city," says -Dean Stanley, "is the one marked intervention on -behalf of the northern capital. No other incident could -be found in the sacred annals so appropriately to -express, in the Church of Gouda, the pious gratitude -of the citizens of Leyden, for their deliverance from the -Spanish army, as the miraculous raising of the siege of -Samaria."<a name="FNanchor_130_130" id="FNanchor_130_130"></a><a href="#Footnote_130_130" class="fnanchor">[130]</a></p> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_87" id="Page_87">[Pg 87]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_IX" id="CHAPTER_IX">CHAPTER IX</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE SHUNAMMITE AND HAZAEL</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> viii. 1-6, 7-15. (Circ. <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 886.)</h4> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"Our acts still follow with us from afar,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">And what we have been makes us what we are."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 26em;"><span class="smcap">George Eliot.</span></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>The next anecdote of Elisha brings us once -more into contact with the Lady of Shunem. -Famines, or dearths, were unhappily of very frequent -occurrence in a country which is so wholly dependent, -as Palestine is, upon the early and latter rain. On -some former occasion Elisha had foreseen that "Jehovah -had called for a famine"; for the sword, the famine, -and the pestilence are represented as ministers who -wait His bidding.<a name="FNanchor_131_131" id="FNanchor_131_131"></a><a href="#Footnote_131_131" class="fnanchor">[131]</a> He had also foreseen that it would -be of long duration, and in kindness to the Shunammite -had warned her that she had better remove for a -time into a land in which there was greater plenty. It -was under similar circumstances that Elimelech and -Naomi, ancestors of David's line, had taken their sons -Mahlon and Chilion, and gone to live in the land of -Moab; and, indeed, the famine which decided the -migration of Jacob and his children into Egypt had -been a turning-point in the history of the Chosen -People.</p> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_88" id="Page_88">[Pg 88]</a></span></p> -<p>The Lady of Shunem had learnt by experience the -weight of Elisha's words. Her husband is not mentioned, -and was probably dead; so she arose with her -household, and went for seven years to live in the -plain of Philistia. At the end of that time the dearth -had ceased, and she returned to Shunem, but only to -find that during her absence her house and land were -in possession of other owners, and had probably -escheated to the Crown. The king was the ultimate, -and to a great extent the only, source of justice in his -little kingdom, and she went to lay her claim before -him and demand the restitution of her property. By -a providential circumstance she came exactly at the -most favourable moment. The king—it must have -been Jehoram—was at the very time talking to Gehazi -about the great works of Elisha. As it is unlikely that -he would converse long with a leper, and as Gehazi -is still called "the servant of the man of God," the -incident may here be narrated out of order. It is -pleasant to find Jehoram taking so deep an interest -in the prophet's story. Already on many occasions -during his wars with Moab and Syria, as well as on -the occasion of Naaman's visit, if that had already -occurred, he had received the completest proof of the -reality of Elisha's mission, but he might be naturally -unaware of the many private incidents in which he had -exhibited a supernatural power. Among other stories -Gehazi was telling him that of the Shunammite, and how -Elisha had given life to her dead son. At that juncture -she came before the king, and Gehazi said, "My lord, -O king, this is the very woman, and this is her son -whom Elisha recalled to life." In answer to Jehoram's -questions she confirmed the story, and he was so much -impressed by the narrative that he not only ordered<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_89" id="Page_89">[Pg 89]</a></span> -the immediate restitution of her land, but also of the -value of its products during the seven years of her exile.</p> - -<p>We now come to the fulfilment of the second of the -commands which Elijah had received so long before -at Horeb. To complete the retribution which was yet -to fall on Israel, he had been bidden to anoint Hazael -to be king of Syria in the room of Benhadad. Hitherto -the mandate had remained unfulfilled, because no opportunity -had occurred; but the appointed time had now -arrived. Elisha, for some purpose, and during an -interval of peace, visited Damascus, where the visit -of Naaman and the events of the Syrian wars had -made his name very famous. Benhadad II., grandson -or great-grandson of Rezin, after a stormy reign of -some thirty years, marked by some successes, but also -by the terrible reverses already recorded, lay dangerously -ill. Hearing the news that the wonder-working -prophet of Israel was in his capital, he sent to ask -of him the question, "Shall I recover?" It had been -the custom from the earliest days to propitiate the -favour of prophets by presents, without which even the -humblest suppliant hardly ventured to approach them.<a name="FNanchor_132_132" id="FNanchor_132_132"></a><a href="#Footnote_132_132" class="fnanchor">[132]</a> -The gift sent by Benhadad was truly royal, for he -thought perhaps that he could purchase the intercession -or the miraculous intervention of this mighty thaumaturge. -He sent Hazael with a selection "of every good -thing of Damascus," and, like an Eastern, he endeavoured -to make his offering seem more magnificent<a name="FNanchor_133_133" id="FNanchor_133_133"></a><a href="#Footnote_133_133" class="fnanchor">[133]</a> by -distributing it on the backs of forty camels.</p> - -<p>At the head of this imposing procession of camels<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_90" id="Page_90">[Pg 90]</a></span> -walked Hazael, the commander of the forces, and stood -in Elisha's presence with the humble appeal, "Thy son -Benhadad, King of Syria, hath sent me to thee, saying, -Shall I recover of this disease?"</p> - -<p>About the king's munificence we are told no more, -but we cannot doubt that it was refused. If Naaman's -still costlier blessing had been rejected, though he was -about to receive through Elisha's ministration an inestimable -boon, it is unlikely that Elisha would accept -a gift for which he could offer no return, and which, -in fact, directly or indirectly, involved the death of -the sender. But the historian does not think it necessary -to pause and tell us that Elisha sent back the -forty camels unladen of their treasures. It was not -worth while to narrate what was a matter of course. -If it had been no time, a few years earlier, to receive -money and garments, and olive-yards and vineyards, and -men-servants and maid-servants, still less was it a time -to do so now. The days were darker now than they -had been, and Elisha himself stood near the Great White -Throne. The protection of these fearless prophets lay -in their utter simplicity of soul. They rose above -human fears because they stood above human desires. -What Elisha possessed was more than sufficient for the -needs of the plain and humble life of one whose communing -was with God. It was not wonderful that -prophets should rise to an elevation whence they could -look down with indifference upon the superfluities of -the lust of the eyes and the pride of life, when even -sages of the heathen have attained to a similar independence -of earthly luxuries. One who can climb such -mountain-heights can look with silent contempt on -gold.</p> - -<p>But there is a serious difficulty about Elisha's answer<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_91" id="Page_91">[Pg 91]</a></span> -to the embassage. "Go, say unto him"—so it is -rendered in our Authorised Version—"Thou mayest -certainly recover: howbeit the Lord hath showed me -that he shall surely die."</p> - -<p>It is evident that the translators of 1611 meant the -emphasis to be laid on the "<i>mayest</i>," and understood -the answer of Elisha to mean, "Thy recovery is quite -possible; and yet"—he adds to Hazael, and not as -part of his answer to the king—"Jehovah has shown -me that dying he shall die,"—not indeed of this disease, -but by other means before he has recovered from it.</p> - -<p>Unfortunately, however, the Hebrew will not bear -this meaning. Elisha bids Hazael to go back with the -distinct message, "Thou shalt surely recover," as it is -rightly rendered in the Revised Version.</p> - -<p>This, however, is the rendering, not of the <i>written</i> -text as it stands, but of the margin. Every one knows -that in the Masoretic original the text itself is called -the K'thb, or "what is written," whereas the margin -is called <i>Q'r</i>, "read." Now, our translators, both those -of 1611 and those of the Revision Committee, all but -invariably follow the Kethb as the most authentic -reading. In this instance, however, they abandon the -rule and translate the marginal reading.</p> - -<p>What, then, is the written text?</p> - -<p>It is the reverse of the marginal reading, for it has: -"Go, say, Thou shalt <i>not</i> recover."</p> - -<p>The reader may naturally ask the cause of this -startling discrepancy.</p> - -<p>It seems to be twofold.</p> - -<p>(I.) Both the Hebrew word <i>lo</i>, "not" (לֹא), and the -word <i>lo</i>, "to him" (לוֹ), have precisely the same pronunciation. -Hence this text might mean either "Go, -say <i>to him</i>, Thou shalt certainly recover," or "Go,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_92" id="Page_92">[Pg 92]</a></span> -say, Thou shalt <i>not</i> recover." The same identity of the -negative and the dative of the preposition has made -nonsense of another passage of the Authorised Version, -where "Thou hast multiplied the nation, and <i>not</i> increased -the joy: they joy before Thee according to -the joy of harvest," should be "Thou hast multiplied -the nation, and increased <i>its</i> joy." So, too, the verse -"It is He that hath made us, and <i>not</i> we ourselves," -may mean "It is He that hath made us, and <i>to Him</i> -we belong." In the present case the adoption of the -negative (which would have conveyed to Benhadad the -exact truth) is not possible; for it makes the next -clause and its introduction by the word "Howbeit" -entirely meaningless.</p> - -<p>But (II.) this confusion in the text might not have -arisen in the present instance but for the difficulty of -Elisha's appearing to send a deliberately false message -to Benhadad, and a message which he tells Hazael at -the time is false.</p> - -<p>Can this be deemed impossible?</p> - -<p>With the views prevalent in "those times of ignorance," -I think not. Abraham and Isaac, saints and -patriarchs as they were, both told practical falsehoods -about their wives. They, indeed, were reproved for -this, though not severely; but, on the other hand, Jael -is not reproved for her treachery to Sisera; and Samuel, -under the semblance of a Divine permission, used a -diplomatic ruse when he visited the household of Jesse; -and in the apologue of Micaiah a lying spirit is represented -as sent forth to do service to Jehovah; and -Elisha himself tells a deliberate falsehood to the Syrians -at Dothan. The sensitiveness to the duty of always -speaking the exact truth is not felt in the East with -anything like the intensity that it is in Christian lands;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_93" id="Page_93">[Pg 93]</a></span> -and reluctant as we should be to find in the message -of Elisha another instance of that <i>falsitas dispensativa</i> -which has been so fatally patronised by some of -the Fathers and by many Romish theologians, the -love of truth itself would compel us to accept this -view of the case, if there were no other possible interpretation.</p> - -<p>I think, however, that another view is possible. I -think that Elisha may have said to Hazael, "Go, say -unto him, Thou shalt surely recover," with the same -accent of irony in which Micaiah said at first to the -two kings, "Go up to Ramoth-Gilead, and prosper; for -the Lord shall deliver it into the hand of the king." I -think that his whole manner and the tone of his voice -may have shown to Hazael, and may have been meant -to show him, that this was not Elisha's real message -to Benhadad. Or, to adopt the same line of explanation -with an unimportant difference, Elisha may have -meant to imply, "Go, follow the bent which I know you -<i>will</i> follow; go, carry back to your master the lying -message that I said he would recover. But that is -not <i>my</i> message. My message, whether it suits your -courtier instincts or not, is that Jehovah has warned -me that he shall surely die."</p> - -<p>That some such meaning as this attaches to the -verse seems to be shown by the context. For not only -was some reproof involved in Elisha's words, but he -showed his grief still more by his manner. It was as -though he had said, "Take back what message you -choose, but Benhadad will certainly die"; and then -he fastened his steady gaze on the soldier's countenance, -till Hazael blushed and became uneasy. Only -when he noted that Hazael's conscience was troubled -by the glittering eyes which seemed to read the inmost<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_94" id="Page_94">[Pg 94]</a></span> -secrets of his heart did Elisha drop his glance, and -burst into tears. "Why weepeth, my lord?" asked -Hazael, in still deeper uneasiness. Whereupon Elisha -revealed to him the future. "I weep," he said, "because -I see in thee the curse and the avenger of the sins of -my native land. Thou wilt become to them a sword -of God; thou wilt set their fortresses on fire; thou -wilt slaughter their youths; thou wilt dash their little -ones to pieces against the stones; thou wilt rip up their -women with child." That he actually inflicted these -savageries of warfare on the miserable Israelites we -are not told, but we are told that he smote them in -all their coasts; that Jehovah delivered them into -his hands; that he oppressed Israel all the days of -Jehoahaz.<a name="FNanchor_134_134" id="FNanchor_134_134"></a><a href="#Footnote_134_134" class="fnanchor">[134]</a> That being so, there can be no question -that he carried out the same laws of atrocious warfare -which belonged to those times and continued long -afterwards. Such atrocities were not only inflicted on -the Israelites again and again by the Assyrians and -others,<a name="FNanchor_135_135" id="FNanchor_135_135"></a><a href="#Footnote_135_135" class="fnanchor">[135]</a> but they themselves had often inflicted them, -and inflicted them with what they believed to be Divine -approval, on their own enemies.<a name="FNanchor_136_136" id="FNanchor_136_136"></a><a href="#Footnote_136_136" class="fnanchor">[136]</a> Centuries after, one -of their own poets accounted it a beatitude to him who -should dash the children of the Babylonians against the -stones.<a name="FNanchor_137_137" id="FNanchor_137_137"></a><a href="#Footnote_137_137" class="fnanchor">[137]</a></p> - -<p>As the answer of Hazael is usually read and interpreted, -we are taught to regard it as an indignant -declaration that he could never be guilty of such vile -deeds. It is regarded as though it were "an abhorrent -repudiation of his future self." The lesson often drawn<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_95" id="Page_95">[Pg 95]</a></span> -from it in sermons is that a man may live to do, and -to delight in, crimes which he once hated and deemed -it impossible that he should ever commit.</p> - -<p>The lesson is a most true one, and is capable of -a thousand illustrations. It conveys the deeply needed -warning that those who, even in thought, dabble with -wrong courses, which they only regard as venial peccadilloes, -may live to commit, without any sense of horror, -the most enormous offences. It is the explanation of -the terrible fact that youths who once seemed innocent -and holy-minded may grow up, step by step, into -colossal criminals. "Men," says Scherer, "advance -unconsciously from errors to faults, and from faults -to crimes, till sensibility is destroyed by the habitual -spectacle of guilt, and the most savage atrocities come -to be dignified by the name of State policy."</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Lui-mme son portrait forc de rendre hommage,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Il frmira d'horreur devant sa propre image."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>But true and needful as these lessons are, they are -entirely beside the mark as deduced from the story -of Hazael. What he said was not, as in our Authorised -Version, "But what, is thy servant a dog, that he -should do this great thing?" nor by "great thing" does -he mean "so deadly a crime." His words, more -accurately rendered in our Revision, are, "But what -is thy servant, which is but a dog, that he should do -this great thing?" or, "But what is the dog, thy -servant?" It was a hypocritic deprecation of the -future importance and eminence which Elisha had prophesied -for him. There is not the least sense of horror -either in his words or in his thoughts. He merely -means "A mere dog, such as I am, can never accomplish -such great designs." A dog in the East is utterly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_96" id="Page_96">[Pg 96]</a></span> -despised;<a name="FNanchor_138_138" id="FNanchor_138_138"></a><a href="#Footnote_138_138" class="fnanchor">[138]</a> and Hazael, with Oriental irony, calls himself -a dog, though he was the Syrian Commander-in-chief—just -as a Chinaman, in speaking of himself, adopts the -periphrasis "this little thief."</p> - -<p>Elisha did not notice his sham humility, but told him, -"The Lord hath showed me that thou shalt be King -over Syria." The date of the event was <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 886.</p> - -<p>The scene has sometimes been misrepresented to -Elisha's discredit, as though he suggested to the general -the crimes of murder and rebellion. The accusation -is entirely untenable. Elisha was, indeed, in one sense, -commissioned to anoint Hazael King of Syria, because -the cruel soldier had been predestined by God to that -position; but, in another sense, he had no power -whatever to give to Hazael the mighty kingdom of -Aram, nor to wrest it from the dynasty which had now -held it for many generations. All this was brought -about by the Divine purpose, in a course of events -entirely out of the sphere of the humble man of God. -In the transferring of this crown he was in no sense -the agent or the suggester. The thought of usurpation -must, without doubt, have been already in Hazael's -mind. Benhadad, as far as we know, was childless. -At any rate he had no natural heirs, and seems to -have been a drunken king, whose reckless undertakings -and immense failures had so completely alienated the -affections of his subjects from himself and his dynasty, -that he died undesired and unlamented, and no hand -was uplifted to strike a blow in his defence. It hardly -needed a prophet to foresee that the sceptre would -be snatched by so strong a hand as that of Hazael from -a grasp so feeble as that of Benhadad II. The utmost -that Elisha had done was, under Divine guidance, to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_97" id="Page_97">[Pg 97]</a></span> -read his character and his designs, and to tell him that -the accomplishment of these designs was near at hand.</p> - -<p>So Hazael went back to Benhadad, and in answer to -the eager inquiry, "What said Elisha to thee?" he -gave the answer which Elisha had foreseen that he -meant to give, and which was in any case a falsehood, -for it suppressed half of what Elisha had really said. -"He told me," said Hazael, "that thou shouldest surely -recover."</p> - -<p>Was the sequel of the interview the murder of -Benhadad by Hazael?</p> - -<p>The story has usually been so read, but Elisha had -neither prophesied this nor suggested it. The sequel -is thus described. "And it came to pass on the morrow, -that <i>he</i> took the coverlet,<a name="FNanchor_139_139" id="FNanchor_139_139"></a><a href="#Footnote_139_139" class="fnanchor">[139]</a> and dipped it in water, and -spread it on his face, so that he died: and Hazael reigned -in his stead." The repetition of the name Hazael in -the last clause is superfluous if he was the subject -of the previous clause, and it has been consequently -conjectured that "he took" is merely the impersonal -idiom "one took." Some suppose that, as Benhadad -was in the bath, his servant took the bath-cloth, wetted -it, and laid its thick folds over the mouth of the helpless -king; others, that he soaked the thick quilt, which the -king was too weak to lift away.<a name="FNanchor_140_140" id="FNanchor_140_140"></a><a href="#Footnote_140_140" class="fnanchor">[140]</a> In either case it is -hardly likely that a great officer like Hazael would<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_98" id="Page_98">[Pg 98]</a></span> -have been in the bath-room or the bed-room of the -dying king. Yet we must remember that the Prtorian -Prfect Macro is said to have suffocated Tiberius -with his bed-clothes. Josephus says that Hazael -strangled his master with a net; and, indeed, he has -generally been held guilty of the perpetration of the -murder. But it is fair to give him the benefit of the -doubt. Be that as it may, he seems to have reigned -for some forty-six years (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 886-840), and to have -bequeathed the sceptre to a son on whom he had -bestowed the old dynastic name of Benhadad.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_99" id="Page_99">[Pg 99]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_X" id="CHAPTER_X">CHAPTER X</a></h2> - -<h3>(1) <i>JEHORAM BEN-JEHOSHAPHAT OF JUDAH</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 851-843</h4> - -<h3>(2) <i>AHAZIAH BEN-JEHORAM OF JUDAH</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 843-842</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> viii. 16-24, 25-29</h4> - -<p class="center">"Bear like the Turk, no brother near the throne."—<span class="smcap">Pope.</span></p> - - -<p>The narrative now reverts to the kingdom of -Judah, of which the historian, mainly occupied -with the great deeds of the prophet in Israel, takes -at this period but little notice.</p> - -<p>He tells us that in the fifth year of Jehoram of Israel, -son of Ahab, his namesake and brother-in-law, Jehoram -of Judah, began to reign in Judah, though his father, -Jehoshaphat, was then king.<a name="FNanchor_141_141" id="FNanchor_141_141"></a><a href="#Footnote_141_141" class="fnanchor">[141]</a></p> - -<p>The statement is full of difficulties, especially as -we have been already told (i. 17) that Jehoram ben-Ahab -of Israel began to reign in the <i>second</i> year of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_100" id="Page_100">[Pg 100]</a></span> -Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat of Judah, and (iii. 1) in -the eighteenth year of Jehoshaphat. It is hardly -worth while to pause here to disentangle these complexities -in a writer who, like most Eastern historians, -is content with loose chronological references. By -the current mode of reckoning, the twenty-five years -of Jehoshaphat's reign may merely mean twenty-three -and a month or two of two other years; and some -suppose that, when Jehoram of Judah was about sixteen, -his father went on the expedition against Moab, and -associated his son with him in the throne. This is -only conjecture. Jehoshaphat, of all kings, least needed -a coadjutor, particularly so weak and worthless a one -as his son; and though the association of colleagues -with themselves has been common in some realms, -there is not a single instance of it in the history of -Israel and Judah—the case of Uzziah, who was a leper, -not being to the point.<a name="FNanchor_142_142" id="FNanchor_142_142"></a><a href="#Footnote_142_142" class="fnanchor">[142]</a></p> - -<p>The kings both of Israel and of Judah at this -period, with the single exception of the brave and -good Jehoshaphat, were unworthy and miserable. The -blight of the Jezebel-marriage and the curse of Baal-worship -lay upon both kingdoms. It is scarcely -possible to find such wretched monarchs as the two -sons of Jezebel—Ahaziah and Jehoram in Israel, and -the son-in-law and grandson of Jezebel, Jehoram and -Ahaziah, in Judah. Their respective reigns are annals -of shameful apostasy, and almost unbroken disaster.</p> - -<p>Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat of Judah was thirty-two -years old when he began his independent reign, and -reigned for eight deplorable years. The fact that his -mother's name is (exceptionally) omitted seems to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_101" id="Page_101">[Pg 101]</a></span> -imply that his father Jehoshaphat set the good example -of monogamy.<a name="FNanchor_143_143" id="FNanchor_143_143"></a><a href="#Footnote_143_143" class="fnanchor">[143]</a> Jehoram was wholly under the influence -of Athaliah, his wife, and of Jezebel, his mother-in-law, -and he introduced into Judah their alien -abominations. He "walked in their way, and did evil -in the sight of the Lord." The Chronicler fills up -the general remark by saying that he did his utmost -to foster idolatry by erecting <i>bamoth</i> in the mountains -of Judah, and compelled his people to worship there, -in order to decentralise the religious services of the -kingdom, and so to diminish the glory of the Temple. -He introduced Baal-worship into Judah, and either -he or his son was the guilty builder of a temple to -Baalim, not only on the "opprobrious mount" on -which stood the idolatrous chapels of Solomon, but on -the Hill of the House itself. This temple had its own -high priest, and was actually adorned with treasures -torn from the Temple of Jehovah.<a name="FNanchor_144_144" id="FNanchor_144_144"></a><a href="#Footnote_144_144" class="fnanchor">[144]</a> So bad was -Jehoram's conduct that the historian can only attribute -his non-destruction to the "covenant of salt" which -God had made with David, "to give him a lamp for -his children always."</p> - -<p>But if actual destruction did not come upon him and -his race, he came very near such a fate, and he -certainly experienced that "the path of transgressors -is hard." There is nothing to record about him but -crime and catastrophe. First Edom revolted. Jehoshaphat -had subdued the Edomites, and only allowed them -to be governed by a vassal; now they threw off the -yoke. The Jewish King advanced against them to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_102" id="Page_102">[Pg 102]</a></span> -"Zair"—by which must be meant apparently either -Zoar (through which the road to Edom lay), or their -capital, Mount Seir.<a name="FNanchor_145_145" id="FNanchor_145_145"></a><a href="#Footnote_145_145" class="fnanchor">[145]</a> There he was surrounded by the -Edomite hosts; and though by a desperate act of valour -he cut his way through them at night in spite of their -reserve of chariots, yet his army left him in the lurch.<a name="FNanchor_146_146" id="FNanchor_146_146"></a><a href="#Footnote_146_146" class="fnanchor">[146]</a> -Edom succeeded in establishing its final independence, -to which we see an allusion in the one hope held out -to Esau by Isaac in that "blessing" which was practically -a curse.</p> - -<p>The loss of so powerful a subject-territory, which -now constituted a source of danger on the eastern -frontier of Judah, was succeeded by another disaster -on the south-west, in the Shephelah or lowland plain. -Here Libnah revolted,<a name="FNanchor_147_147" id="FNanchor_147_147"></a><a href="#Footnote_147_147" class="fnanchor">[147]</a> and by gaining its autonomy -contracted yet farther the narrow limits of the southern -kingdom.</p> - -<p>The Book of Kings tells us no more about the Jewish -Jehoram, only adding that he died and was buried with -his fathers, and was succeeded by his son Ahaziah. -But the Book of Chronicles, which adds far darker -touches to his character, also heightens to an extraordinary -degree the intensity of his punishment. It tells -us that he began his reign by the atrocious murder -of his six younger brothers, for whom, following the -old precedent of Rehoboam, Jehoshaphat had provided<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_103" id="Page_103">[Pg 103]</a></span> -by establishing them as governors of various cities. As -his throne was secure, we cannot imagine any motive -for this brutal massacre except the greed of gain, and -we can only suppose that, as Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat -became little more than a friendly vassal of his kinsmen -in Israel, so he fell under the deadly influence of his -wife Athaliah, as completely as his father-in-law had -done under the spell of her mother Jezebel. With his -brothers he also swept away a number of the chief -nobles, who perhaps embraced the cause of his murdered -kinsmen. Such conduct breathes the known spirit of -Jezebel and of Athaliah. To rebuke him for this -wickedness, he received the menace of a tremendous -judgment upon his home and people in a writing from -<i>Elijah</i>, whom we should certainly have assumed to -be dead long before that time. The judgment itself -followed. The Philistines and Arabians invaded Judah, -captured Jerusalem, and murdered all Jehoram's own -children, except Ahaziah, who was the youngest. Then -Jehoram, at the age of thirty-eight, was smitten with an -incurable disease of the bowels, of which he died two -years later, and not only died unlamented, but was -refused burial in the sepulchres of the kings. In any -case his reign and that of his son and successor were -the most miserable in the annals of Judah, as the -reigns of their namesakes and kinsmen, Ahaziah ben-Ahab -and Jehoram ben-Ahab, were also the most -miserable in the annals of Israel.</p> - -<p>Jehoram was succeeded on the throne of Judah by -his son Ahaziah. If the chronology and the facts be -correct, Ahaziah ben-Jehoram of Judah must have been -born when his father was only eighteen, though he -was the youngest of the king's sons, and so escaped -from being massacred in the Philistine invasion. He<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_104" id="Page_104">[Pg 104]</a></span> -succeeded at the age of twenty-two, and only reigned a -single year. During this year his mother, the Gebrah -Athaliah, the daughter of Ahab and Jezebel, and granddaughter -of the Tyrian Ethbaal, was all-supreme. -She bent the weak nature of her son to still further -apostasies. She was "his counsellor to do wickedly," -and her Baal-priest Mattan was more important than -the Aaronic high priest of the despised and desecrated -Temple. Never did Judah sink to so low a level, and -it was well that the days of Ahaziah of Judah were cut -short.</p> - -<p>The only event in his reign was the share he took -with his uncle Jehoram of Israel in his campaign to -protect Ramoth-Gilead from Hazael. The expedition -seems to have been successful in its main purpose. -Ramoth-Gilead, the key to the districts of Argob and -Bashan, was of immense importance for commanding the -country beyond Jordan. It seems to be the same as -Ramath-Mizpeh (Josh. xiii. 26); and if so, it was the -spot where Jacob made his covenant with Laban. -Ahab, or his successors, in spite of the disastrous end -of the expedition to Ahab personally, had evidently -recovered the frontier fortress from the Syrian king.<a name="FNanchor_148_148" id="FNanchor_148_148"></a><a href="#Footnote_148_148" class="fnanchor">[148]</a> -Its position upon a hill made its possession vital to the -interests of Gilead; for the master of Ramah was the -master of that Trans-Jordanic district. But Hazael had -succeeded his murdered master, and was already -beginning to fulfil the ruthless mission which Elisha -had foreseen with tears. Jehoram ben-Ahab seems to -have held his own against Hazael for a time; but in the -course of the campaign at Ramoth he was so severely -wounded that he was compelled to leave his army under -the command of Jehu, and to return to Jezreel, to be<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_105" id="Page_105">[Pg 105]</a></span> -healed of his wounds. Thither his nephew Ahaziah -of Judah went to visit him; and there, as we shall hear, -he too met his doom. That fate, the Chronicler tells -us, was the penalty of his iniquities. "The destruction -of Ahaziah was of God by coming to Joram."</p> - -<p>We have no ground for accusing either king of any -want of courage; yet it was obviously impolitic of -Jehoram to linger unnecessarily in his luxurious capital, -while the army of Israel was engaged in service on a -dangerous frontier. The wounds inflicted by the -Syrian archers may have been originally severe. Their -arrows at this time played as momentous a part in -history as the cloth-yard shafts of our English bowmen -which "sewed the French ranks together" at Poictiers, -Crey, and Azincour. But Jehoram had at any rate -so far recovered that he could ride in his chariot; and -if he had been wise and bravely vigorous, he would -not have left his army under a subordinate at so perilous -an epoch, and menaced by so resolute a foe. Or -if he were indeed compelled to consult the better -physicians at Jezreel, he should have persuaded his -nephew Ahaziah of Judah—who seems to have been -more or less of a vassal as well as a kinsman—to keep -an eye on the beleaguered fort. Both kings, however, -deserted their post,—Jehoram to recover perfect health; -and Ahaziah, who had been his comrade—as their -father and grandfather had gone together to the same -war—to pay a state visit of condolence to the royal -invalid. The army was left under a popular, resolute, -and wholly unscrupulous commander, and the results -powerfully affected the immediate and the ultimate -destiny of both kingdoms.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_106" id="Page_106">[Pg 106]</a></span></p> - - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XI" id="CHAPTER_XI">CHAPTER XI</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE REVOLT OF JEHU</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 842</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> ix. 1-37</h4> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"Te semper anteit sva Necessitas</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">Clavos trabales et cuneos manu,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">Gestans ahen."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 16.5em;"><span class="smcap">Horat.</span>, <i>Od.</i>, I. xxxv. 17.</span><br /> -</p> - -<p>A long period had elapsed since Elijah had received -the triple commission which was to mark -the close of his career. Two of those Divine behests -had now been accomplished. He had anointed Elisha, -son of Shaphat, of Abel-Meholah, to be prophet in his -room;<a name="FNanchor_149_149" id="FNanchor_149_149"></a><a href="#Footnote_149_149" class="fnanchor">[149]</a> and Elisha had anointed Hazael to be king -over Syria;<a name="FNanchor_150_150" id="FNanchor_150_150"></a><a href="#Footnote_150_150" class="fnanchor">[150]</a> the third and more dangerous commission, -involving nothing less than the overthrow of the mighty -dynasty of Omri, remained still unaccomplished.</p> - -<p>If the name of Jehu ("Jehovah is He")<a name="FNanchor_151_151" id="FNanchor_151_151"></a><a href="#Footnote_151_151" class="fnanchor">[151]</a> had been -actually mentioned to Elijah, the dreadful secret must -have remained buried in the breast of the prophet and -in that of his successor for many years. Further, Jehu -was yet a very young man, and to have marked him -out as the founder of a dynasty would have been to -doom him to certain destruction. An Eastern king,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_107" id="Page_107">[Pg 107]</a></span> -whose family has once securely seated itself on the -throne, is hedged round with an awful divinity, and -demands an unquestioning obedience. Elijah had been -removed from earth before this task had been fulfilled, -and Elisha had to wait for his opportunity. But the -doom was passed, though the judgment was belated. -The sons of Ahab were left a space to repent, or to -fill to the brim the cup of their father's iniquities.</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"The sword of Heaven is not in haste to smite,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Nor yet doth linger."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>Ahaziah, Ahab's eldest son, after a reign of one year, -marked only by crimes and misfortunes, had ended -in overwhelming disaster his deplorable career. His -brother Jehoram had succeeded him, and had now been -on the throne for at least twelve years, which had been -chiefly signalised by that unsuccessful attempt to recover -the territory of revolted Moab, to which we owe the -celebrated Stone of Mesha. We have already narrated -the result of the campaign which had so many vicissitudes. -The combined armies of Israel, Judah, and -Edom had been delivered by the interposition of Elisha -from perishing of thirst beside the scorched-up bed of -the Wady-el-Ahsy; and availing themselves of the rash -assault of the Moabites, had swept everything before -them. But Moab stood at bay at Kir-Haraseth (Kerak), -his strongest fortress, six miles from Ar or Rabbah, -and ten miles east of the southern end of the Dead -Sea. It stood three thousand feet above the level of -the sea, and is defended by a network of steep valleys. -Nevertheless, Israel would have subdued it, but for -the act of horrible despair to which the King of Moab -resorted in his extremity, by offering up his eldest son -as a burnt-offering to Chemosh upon the wall of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_108" id="Page_108">[Pg 108]</a></span> -city. Horror-stricken by the catastrophe, and terrified -with the dread that the vengeance of Chemosh could -not but be aroused by so tremendous a sacrifice, the -besieging host had retired. From that moment Moab -had not only been free, but assumed the <i>rle</i> of an -aggressor, and sent her marauding bands to harry -and carry the farms and homesteads of her former -conqueror.<a name="FNanchor_152_152" id="FNanchor_152_152"></a><a href="#Footnote_152_152" class="fnanchor">[152]</a></p> - -<p>Then followed the aggressions of Benhadad which -had been frustrated by the insight of Elisha, and which -owed their temporary cessation to his generosity.<a name="FNanchor_153_153" id="FNanchor_153_153"></a><a href="#Footnote_153_153" class="fnanchor">[153]</a> -The reappearance of the Syrians in the field had reduced -Samaria to the lowest depths of ghastly famine. -But the day of the guilty city had not yet come, and -a sudden panic, caused among the invaders by a -rumoured assault of Hittites and Egyptians, had saved -her from destruction.<a name="FNanchor_154_154" id="FNanchor_154_154"></a><a href="#Footnote_154_154" class="fnanchor">[154]</a> Taking advantage of the respite -caused by the change of the Syrian dynasty, and -pressing on his advantage, Jehoram, with the aid of -his Judan nephew, had once more got possession of -Ramoth-Gilead before Hazael was secure on the throne -which he had usurped.</p> - -<p>This then was the situation:—The allied and kindred -kings of Israel and Judah were idling in the pomp of -hospitality at Jezreel; their armies were encamped -about Ramoth-Gilead; and at the head of the host -of Israel was the crafty and vehement grandson of -Nimshi.</p> - -<p>Elisha saw and seized his opportunity. The day of -vengeance from the Lord had dawned. Things had not -materially altered since the days of Ahab. If Jehovah<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_109" id="Page_109">[Pg 109]</a></span> -was nominally worshipped, if the very names of the -kings of Israel bore witness to His supremacy,<a name="FNanchor_155_155" id="FNanchor_155_155"></a><a href="#Footnote_155_155" class="fnanchor">[155]</a> Baal -was worshipped too. The curse which Elijah had -pronounced against Ahab and his house remained -unfulfilled. The credit of prophecy was at stake. -The blood of Naboth and his slaughtered sons cried -to the Lord from the ground; and hitherto it seemed -to have cried in vain. If the <i>Nebim</i> (the prophetic -class) were to have their due weight in Israel, the hour -had come, and the man was ready.</p> - -<p>The light which falls on Elisha is dim and intermittent. -His name is surrounded by a halo of nebulous -wonders, of which many are of a private and personal -character. But he was a known enemy of Ahab and -his house. He had, indeed, more than once interposed -to snatch them from ruin, as in the expedition against -Moab, and in the awful straits of the siege of Samaria -by the Syrians. But his person had none the less -been hateful to the sons of Jezebel, and his life had -been endangered by their bursts of sudden fury. He -could hardly again have a chance so favourable as that -which now offered itself, when the armed host was at -one place and the king at another. Perhaps, too, he -may have been made aware that the soldiers were not -well pleased to find at their head a king who was so -far a <i>fainant</i> as to leave them exposed to a powerful -enemy, and show no eagerness to return. His "urgent -private affairs" were not so urgent as to entitle him to -take his ease at luxurious Jezreel.</p> - -<p>Where Elisha was at the time we do not know—perhaps -at Dothan, perhaps at Samaria. Suddenly he -called to him a youth—one of the Sons of the Prophets, -on whose speed and courage he could rely—placed in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_110" id="Page_110">[Pg 110]</a></span> -his hands a vial of the consecrated anointing oil,<a name="FNanchor_156_156" id="FNanchor_156_156"></a><a href="#Footnote_156_156" class="fnanchor">[156]</a> told -him to gird up his loins,<a name="FNanchor_157_157" id="FNanchor_157_157"></a><a href="#Footnote_157_157" class="fnanchor">[157]</a> and to speed across the Jordan -to Ramoth-Gilead. When he arrived, he was to bid -Jehu rise up from the company of his fellow-captains -to hurry him into "a chamber within a chamber,"<a name="FNanchor_158_158" id="FNanchor_158_158"></a><a href="#Footnote_158_158" class="fnanchor">[158]</a> to -shut the door for secrecy, to pour the consecrating oil -upon his head, to anoint him King of Israel in the -name of Jehovah, and then to fly without a moment's -delay.<a name="FNanchor_159_159" id="FNanchor_159_159"></a><a href="#Footnote_159_159" class="fnanchor">[159]</a></p> - -<p>The messenger—the Rabbis guess that he was -Jonah, the son of Amittai<a name="FNanchor_160_160" id="FNanchor_160_160"></a><a href="#Footnote_160_160" class="fnanchor">[160]</a>—knew well that his was a -service of immense peril, in which his life might easily -pay the forfeit of his temerity. How was he to guess -that at once, without striking a blow, the host of -Israel would fling to the winds its sworn allegiance to -the son of the warrior Ahab, the fourth monarch of -the powerful dynasty of Omri? Might not any one -of a thousand possible accidents thwart a conspiracy of -which the success depended on the unflinching courage -and promptitude of his single hand?</p> - -<p>He was but a youth, but he was the trained pupil of -a master who had, again and again, stood before kings, -and not been afraid. He sprang from a community -which inherited the splendid traditions of the Prophet -of Flame.</p> - -<p>He did not hesitate a moment. He tightened the -camel's hide round his naked limbs, flung back the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_111" id="Page_111">[Pg 111]</a></span> -long dark locks of the Nazarite, and sped upon his -way. A true son of the schools of Jehovah's prophets -has, and can have, no fear of man. The armies of -Israel and Judah saw the wild, flying figure of a young -man, with his hairy garment and streaming locks, rush -through the camp. Whatever might be their surmisings, -he brooked no questions. Availing himself -of the awe with which the shadow of Elijah had -covered the sacrosanct person of a prophetic messenger, -he made his way straight to the war-council of the -captains; and brushing aside every attempt to impede -his progress with the plea that he was the bearer of -Jehovah's message, he burst into the council of the -astonished warriors, who were assembled in the private -courtyard of a house in the fortress-town.<a name="FNanchor_161_161" id="FNanchor_161_161"></a><a href="#Footnote_161_161" class="fnanchor">[161]</a></p> - -<p>He knew the fame of Jehu, but did not know his -person, and dared not waste time. "I have an errand -to thee, O captain," he said to the assembly generally. -The message had been addressed to no one in particular, -and Jehu naturally asked, "Unto which of all -of us?" With the same swift intuition which has -often enabled men in similar circumstances to recognise -a leader—as Josephus recognised Vespasian, and St. -Severinus recognised Odoacer, and Joan of Arc recognised -Charles VI. of France—he at once replied, -"To thee, O captain." Jehu did not hesitate a -moment. Prophets had shown, many a time, that -their messages might not be neglected or despised. -He rose, and followed the youth, who led him into the -most secret recess of the house, and there, emptying -on his head the fragrant oil of consecration, said, "Thus -saith Jehovah, God of Israel, I have anointed thee<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_112" id="Page_112">[Pg 112]</a></span> -king over the people of Jehovah, even over Israel."<a name="FNanchor_162_162" id="FNanchor_162_162"></a><a href="#Footnote_162_162" class="fnanchor">[162]</a> -He was to smite the house of his master Ahab in -vengeance for the blood of Jehovah's prophets and -servants whom Jezebel had murdered. Ahab's house, -every male of it, young and old, bond and free,<a name="FNanchor_163_163" id="FNanchor_163_163"></a><a href="#Footnote_163_163" class="fnanchor">[163]</a> is -doomed to perish, as the houses of Jeroboam and of -Baasha had perished before them, by a bloody end. -Further, the dogs should eat Jezebel by the rampart -of Jezreel,<a name="FNanchor_164_164" id="FNanchor_164_164"></a><a href="#Footnote_164_164" class="fnanchor">[164]</a> and there should be none to bury her.</p> - -<p>One moment sufficed for his daring deed, for his -burning message; the next he had flung open the door -and fled. The soldiers of the camp must have -whispered still more anxiously together as they saw -the same agitated youth rushing through their lines -with the same impetuosity which had marked his -entrance. In those dark days the sudden appearance -of a prophet was usually the herald of some terrific -storm.<a name="FNanchor_165_165" id="FNanchor_165_165"></a><a href="#Footnote_165_165" class="fnanchor">[165]</a></p> - -<p>Jehu was utterly taken by surprise; but according -to the reading preserved by Ephraem Syrus in 2 Kings -ix. 26, he had on the previous night seen in a dream -the blood of Naboth and his sons. If the thought of -revolt had ever passed for a moment through his mind, -it had never assumed a definite shape. True, he had<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_113" id="Page_113">[Pg 113]</a></span> -been a warrior from his youth. True, he had been -one of Ahab's bodyguard, and had ridden before him -in a chariot at least twenty years earlier, and had now -risen by valour and capacity to the high station of -captain of the host. True, also, that he had heard -the great curse which Elijah had pronounced on Ahab -at the door of Naboth's vineyard; but he heard it -while he was yet an obscure youth, and he had little -dreamed that his was the hand which should carry -it into execution. Who was he? And had not the house -of Omri been, in some sense, sanctioned by Heaven? -And were not the words of the prophet "wild and -wandering cries," of which the issues might be averted -by such a repentance as that of Ahab?</p> - -<p>And he felt another misgiving. Might not this -scene be the plot of some secret enemy? Might it -not at any rate be a reckless jest palmed upon him by -his comrades? If any jealous member of the confederacy -of captains betrayed the fact that Jehu had -tampered with their allegiance, would his head be safe -for a single hour? He would act warily. He came -back to his fellow-captains and said nothing.</p> - -<p>But they were burning with curiosity. Something -must be impending. Prophets did not rush in thus -tumultuously for no purpose. Must not the youth's -mantle of hair be some standard of war?</p> - -<p>"Is all right?" they shouted. "Why did this -frantic fellow come to thee?"<a name="FNanchor_166_166" id="FNanchor_166_166"></a><a href="#Footnote_166_166" class="fnanchor">[166]</a></p> - -<p>"You know all about it," answered Jehu, with wary -coolness. "You know more about it than I do. You -know the man, and what his talk was."</p> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_114" id="Page_114">[Pg 114]</a></span></p> -<p>"Lies!" bluntly answered the rough soldiers.<a name="FNanchor_167_167" id="FNanchor_167_167"></a><a href="#Footnote_167_167" class="fnanchor">[167]</a> "Tell -us now."</p> - -<p>Then Jehu's eye took measure of them and their -feelings. A judge of men and of men's countenances, -he saw conspiracy flashing in their faces. He saw that -they suspected the true state of things, and were on -fire to carry it out. Perhaps they had caught sight of -the vial of oil under the youth's scant dress. Could -any quickened observation at least fail to notice that -the soldier's dark locks were shining and fragrant, as -they had not been a moment ago, with consecrated -oil?</p> - -<p>Then Jehu frankly told them the perilous secret. -Thus and thus had the young prophet spoken, and had -said, "Thus saith Jehovah, I have anointed thee king -over Israel."</p> - -<p>The message was met with a shout of answering -approbation. That shout was the death-knell of the -house of Omri. It showed that the reigning dynasty -had utterly forfeited its popularity. No luck had -followed the sons of Naboth's murderer. Israel was -weary of their mother Jezebel. Why was this king -Jehoram, this king of evil auspices, who had been -repudiated by Moab and harried by Syria—why, in the -first gleam of possible prosperity, was he being detained -at Jezreel by wounds which rumour said were already -sufficiently healed to allow him to return to his post? -Down with the seed of the murderer and the sorceress! -Let brave Jehu be king, as Jehovah has said!</p> - -<p>So the captains sprang to their feet, and then and -there seized Jehu, and carried him in triumph to the -top of the stairs which ran round the inside of the -courtyard, and stripped off their mantles to extemporise<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_115" id="Page_115">[Pg 115]</a></span> -for him the semblance of a cushioned throne.<a name="FNanchor_168_168" id="FNanchor_168_168"></a><a href="#Footnote_168_168" class="fnanchor">[168]</a> Then -in the presence of such soldiers as they could trust -they blew a sudden blast of the ram's horn, and -shouted, "Jehu is king!"</p> - -<p>Jehu was not the man to let the grass grow under -his feet. Nothing tries a man's vigour and nerve so -surely as a sudden crisis. It is this swift resolution -which has raised many a man to the throne, as it raised -Otho, and Napoleon I. and Napoleon III. The history -of Israel is specially full of <i>coups d'tat</i>, but no one of -them is half so decisive or overwhelming as this. Jehu -instantly accepted the office of Jehovah's avenger on -the house of Ahab.<a name="FNanchor_169_169" id="FNanchor_169_169"></a><a href="#Footnote_169_169" class="fnanchor">[169]</a> Everything, as Jehu saw, -depended on the suddenness and fury with which the -blow was delivered. "If you want me to be your -king,"<a name="FNanchor_170_170" id="FNanchor_170_170"></a><a href="#Footnote_170_170" class="fnanchor">[170]</a> he said, "keep the lines secure, and guard the -fortress walls. I will be my own messenger to Jehoram. -Let no deserter go forth to give him warning."<a name="FNanchor_171_171" id="FNanchor_171_171"></a><a href="#Footnote_171_171" class="fnanchor">[171]</a></p> - -<p>It was agreed; and Jehu, only taking with him -Bidkar, his fellow-officer, and a small band of followers, -set forth at full speed from Ramoth-Gilead.</p> - -<p>The fortress of Ramoth, now the important town of -Es-Salt, a place which must always have been the key<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_116" id="Page_116">[Pg 116]</a></span> -of Gilead, was built on the summit of a rocky headland, -fortified by nature as well as by art. It is south of the -river Jabbok, and lies at the head of the only easy road -which runs down westward to the Jordan and eastward -to the rich plateau of the interior.<a name="FNanchor_172_172" id="FNanchor_172_172"></a><a href="#Footnote_172_172" class="fnanchor">[172]</a> Crossing the fords -of the Jordan, Jehu would soon be able to join the -main road, which, passing Tirzah, Zaretan, and Beth-shean, -and sweeping eastward of Mount Gilboa, gives -ready access to Jezreel.</p> - -<p>The watchman on the lofty watchtower of the summer -palace caught sight of a storm of dust careering along -from the eastward up the valley towards the city.<a name="FNanchor_173_173" id="FNanchor_173_173"></a><a href="#Footnote_173_173" class="fnanchor">[173]</a> The -times were wild and troublous. What could it be? -He shouted his alarm, "I see a troop!" The tidings -were startling, and the king was instantly informed -that chariots and horsemen were approaching the royal -city. "Send a horseman to meet them," he said, "with -the message, 'Is all well?'"</p> - -<p>Forth flew the rider, and cried to the rushing escort, -"The king asks, 'Is all well? Is it peace?'" For -probably the anxious city hoped that there might have -been some victory of the army against Hazael, which -would fill them with joy.</p> - -<p>"What hast thou to do with peace? Turn thee -behind me," answered Jehu; and perforce the horseman, -whatever may have been his conjectures, had -to follow in the rear.</p> - -<p>"He reached them," cried the sentry on the watchtower, -"but he does not return."</p> - -<p>The news was enigmatical and alarming; and the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_117" id="Page_117">[Pg 117]</a></span> -troubled king sent another horseman. Again the same -colloquy occurred, and again the watchman gave the -ominous message, adding to it the yet more perplexing -news that, in the mad and headlong driving<a name="FNanchor_174_174" id="FNanchor_174_174"></a><a href="#Footnote_174_174" class="fnanchor">[174]</a> of the -charioteer, he recognises the driving of Jehu, the son -of Nimshi.<a name="FNanchor_175_175" id="FNanchor_175_175"></a><a href="#Footnote_175_175" class="fnanchor">[175]</a></p> - -<p>What had happened to his army? Why should the -captain of the host be driving thus furiously to Jezreel?</p> - -<p>Matters were evidently very critical, whatever the -swift approach of chariots and horsemen might portend. -"Yoke my chariot," said Jehoram; and his -nephew Ahaziah, who had shared his campaign, and -was no less consumed with anxiety to learn tidings -which could not but be pressing, rode by him in another -chariot to meet Jehu. They took with them no escort -worth mentioning. The rebellion was not only sudden, -but wholly unexpected.</p> - -<p>The two kings met Jehu in a spot of the darkest -omen. It was the plot of ground which had once been -the vineyard of Naboth, at the door of which Ahab -had heard from Elijah the awful message of his doom. -As the New Forest was ominous to our early Norman -kings as the witness of their cruelties and encroachments, -so was this spot to the house of Omri, though -it was adjacent to their ivory palace, and had been -transformed from a vineyard into a garden or pleasance.</p> - -<p>"Is it peace, Jehu?" shouted the agitated king; by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_118" id="Page_118">[Pg 118]</a></span> -which probably he only meant to ask, "Is all going -well in the army at Ramoth?"</p> - -<p>The fierce answer which burst from the lips of -his general fatally undeceived him. "What peace," -brutally answered the rebel, "so long as the whoredoms -of thy mother Jezebel and her witchcrafts are so -many?" She, after all, was the <i>fons et origo mali</i> -to the house of Jehoram. Hers was the dark spirit -of murder and idolatry which had walked in that house. -She was the instigator and the executer of the crime -against Naboth. She had been the foundress of Baal- -and Asherah-worship; she was the murderess of the -prophets; she had been specially marked out for vengeance -in the doom pronounced both by Elijah and Elisha.</p> - -<p>The answer was unmistakable. This was a revolt, -a revolution. "Treachery, Ahaziah!" shouted the -terrified king, and instantly wheeled round his chariot -to flee.<a name="FNanchor_176_176" id="FNanchor_176_176"></a><a href="#Footnote_176_176" class="fnanchor">[176]</a> But not so swiftly as to escape the Nemesis -which had been stealing upon him with leaden feet, but -now smote him irretrievably with iron hand. Without -an instant's hesitation, Jehu snatched his bow from his -attendant charioteer, "filled his hands with it," and -from its full stretch and resonant string sped the arrow, -which smote Jehoram in the back with fatal force, and -passed through his heart.<a name="FNanchor_177_177" id="FNanchor_177_177"></a><a href="#Footnote_177_177" class="fnanchor">[177]</a> Without a word the unhappy -king sank down upon his knees<a name="FNanchor_178_178" id="FNanchor_178_178"></a><a href="#Footnote_178_178" class="fnanchor">[178]</a> in his chariot, -and fell face forward, dead.</p> - -<p>"Take him up," cried Jehu to Bidkar,<a name="FNanchor_179_179" id="FNanchor_179_179"></a><a href="#Footnote_179_179" class="fnanchor">[179]</a> "and fling -him down where he is,—here in this portion of the -field of Naboth the Jezreelite. Here, years ago, you<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_119" id="Page_119">[Pg 119]</a></span> -and I, as we rode behind Ahab,<a name="FNanchor_180_180" id="FNanchor_180_180"></a><a href="#Footnote_180_180" class="fnanchor">[180]</a> heard Elijah utter his -oracle on this man's father, that vengeance should meet -him here. Where the dogs licked the blood of Naboth -and his sons, let dogs lick the blood of the son of Ahab."<a name="FNanchor_181_181" id="FNanchor_181_181"></a><a href="#Footnote_181_181" class="fnanchor">[181]</a></p> - -<p>But Jehu was not the man to let the king's murder -stay his chariot-wheels when more work had yet to be -done. Ahaziah of Judah, too, belonged to Ahab's house, -for he was Ahab's grandson, and Jehoram's nephew -and ally. Without stopping to mourn or avenge the -tragedy of his uncle's murder, Ahaziah fled towards -Bethgan or Engannim,<a name="FNanchor_182_182" id="FNanchor_182_182"></a><a href="#Footnote_182_182" class="fnanchor">[182]</a> the fountain of gardens, south -of Jezreel, on the road to Samaria and Jerusalem. Jehu -gave the laconic order, "Smite him also";<a name="FNanchor_183_183" id="FNanchor_183_183"></a><a href="#Footnote_183_183" class="fnanchor">[183]</a> but fright -added wings to the speed of the hapless King of Judah. -His chariot-steeds were royal steeds, and were fresh; -those of Jehu were spent with the long, fierce drive -from Ramoth. He got as far as the ascent of Gur -before he was overtaken.<a name="FNanchor_184_184" id="FNanchor_184_184"></a><a href="#Footnote_184_184" class="fnanchor">[184]</a> There, not far from -Ibleam, the rocky hill impeded his flight, and he was -wounded by the pursuers. But he managed to struggle -onwards to Megiddo, on the south of the plain of Jezreel, -and there he hid himself.<a name="FNanchor_185_185" id="FNanchor_185_185"></a><a href="#Footnote_185_185" class="fnanchor">[185]</a> He was discovered, dragged<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_120" id="Page_120">[Pg 120]</a></span> -out, and slain. Even Jehu's fierce emissaries did not -make war on dead bodies, any more than Hannibal did, -or Charles V. They left such meanness to Jehu himself, -and to our Charles II. They did not interfere with -the dead king's remains. His servants carried them -to Jerusalem, and there he was buried with his fathers -in the sepulchre of the kings, in the city of David. As -there was nothing more to tell about him, the historian -omits the usual formula about the rest of the acts of -Ahaziah, and all that he did. His death illustrates the -proverb <i>Mitgegangen mitgefangen</i>: he was the comrade -of evil men, and he perished with them.</p> - -<p>Jehu speedily reached Jezreel, but the interposition -of Jehoram and the orders for the pursuit of Ahaziah -had caused a brief delay, and Jezebel had already been -made aware that her doom was imminent.</p> - -<p>Not even the sudden and dreadful death of her son, -and the nearness of her own fate, daunted the steely -heart of the Tyrian sorceress. If she was to die, she -would meet death like a queen. As though for some -Court banquet, she painted her eyelashes and eyebrows -with antimony, to make her eyes look large and lustrous,<a name="FNanchor_186_186" id="FNanchor_186_186"></a><a href="#Footnote_186_186" class="fnanchor">[186]</a> -and put on her jewelled head-dress.<a name="FNanchor_187_187" id="FNanchor_187_187"></a><a href="#Footnote_187_187" class="fnanchor">[187]</a> Then she<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_121" id="Page_121">[Pg 121]</a></span> -mounted the palace tower, and, looking down through -the lattice above the city gate, watched the thundering -advance of Jehu's chariot, and hailed the triumphant -usurper with the bitterest insult she could devise. She -knew that Omri, her husband's father, had taken swift -vengeance on the guilt of the usurper Zimri, who had -been forced to burn himself in the harem at Tirzah -after one month's troubled reign. Her shrill voice was -heard above the roar of the chariot-wheels in the -ominous taunt,—</p> - -<p>"Is it peace, thou Zimri, thou murderer of thy -master?"<a name="FNanchor_188_188" id="FNanchor_188_188"></a><a href="#Footnote_188_188" class="fnanchor">[188]</a></p> - -<p>No!—She meant, "There is no peace for thee nor -thine, any more than for me or mine! Thou mayest -murder us; but thee too, thy doom awaiteth!"</p> - -<p>Stung by the ill-omened words, Jehu looked up at her -and shouted,—</p> - -<p>"Who is on my side? Who?"</p> - -<p>The palace was apparently rife with traitors. Ahab -had been the first polygamist among the kings of Israel, -and therefore the first also to introduce the odious atrocity -of eunuchs. Those hapless wretches, the portents -of Eastern seraglios, the disgrace of humanity, are -almost always the retributive enemies of the societies -of which they are the helpless victims. Fidelity or -gratitude are rarely to be looked for from natures -warped into malignity by the ruthless misdoing of men. -Nor was the nature of Jezebel one to inspire affection. -One or two eunuchs<a name="FNanchor_189_189" id="FNanchor_189_189"></a><a href="#Footnote_189_189" class="fnanchor">[189]</a> immediately thrust out of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_122" id="Page_122">[Pg 122]</a></span> -windows their bloated and beardless faces. "Fling her -down!" Jehu shouted. Down they flung the wretched -queen (has any queen ever died a death so shamelessly -ignominious?), and her blood spirted upon the wall, -and on the horses. Jehu, who had only stopped for -an instant in his headlong rush, drove his horses over -her corpse,<a name="FNanchor_190_190" id="FNanchor_190_190"></a><a href="#Footnote_190_190" class="fnanchor">[190]</a> and entered the gate of her capital with -his wheels crimson with her blood. History records -scarcely another instance of such a scene, except when -Tullia, a century later, drove her chariot over the dead -body of her father Servius Tullius in the <i>Vicus Sceleratus</i> -of ancient Rome.<a name="FNanchor_191_191" id="FNanchor_191_191"></a><a href="#Footnote_191_191" class="fnanchor">[191]</a></p> - -<p>But what cared Jehu? Many a conqueror ere now -has sat down to the dinner prepared for his enemy; -and the obsequious household of the dead tyrants, -ready to do the bidding of their new lord, ushered the -hungry man to the banquet provided for the kings -whom he had slain. No man dreamt of uttering a wail; -no man thought of raising a finger for dead Jehoram or -for dead Jezebel, though they had all been under <i>her</i> -sway for at least five-and-thirty years. "The wicked -perish, and no man regardeth." "When the wicked -perish, there is shouting."<a name="FNanchor_192_192" id="FNanchor_192_192"></a><a href="#Footnote_192_192" class="fnanchor">[192]</a></p> - -<p>We may be startled at a revolution so sudden and -so complete; yet it is true to history. A tyrant or -a cabal may oppress a nation for long years. Their -word may be thought absolute, their power irresistible. -Tyranny seems to paralyse the courage of resistance, -like the fabled head of Medusa. Remove its fascination<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_123" id="Page_123">[Pg 123]</a></span> -of corruption, and men become men, and not machines, -once more. Jehu's daring woke Israel from the lethargy -which had made her tolerate the murders and enchantments -of this Baal-worshipping alien. In the same way -in one week Robespierre seemed to be an invincible -autocrat; the next week his power had crumbled into -dust and ashes at a touch.</p> - -<p>It was not until Jehu had sated his thirst and hunger -after that wild drive, which had ended in the murder -of two kings and a queen and in his sudden elevation to -a throne, that it even occurred to this new tiger-king -to ask what had become of Jezebel. But when he had -eaten and drunk, he said, "Go, see now to this cursed -woman, and bury her: for she is a king's daughter." -That she had been first Princess, then Queen, then -Gebrah in Israel for nearly a full lifetime was nothing: -it was nothing to Jehu that she was a wife, and mother, -and grandmother of kings and queens both of Israel -and Judah;—but she was also the daughter of Ethbaal, -the priest-king of Tyre and Sidon, and therefore any -shameful treatment of her remains might kindle trouble -from the region of Phœnicia.<a name="FNanchor_193_193" id="FNanchor_193_193"></a><a href="#Footnote_193_193" class="fnanchor">[193]</a></p> - -<p>But no one had taken the trouble so much as to look -after the corpse of Jezebel. The populace of Jezreel -were occupied with their new king. Where Jezebel -fell, there she had been suffered to lie; and no one, -apparently, cared even to despoil her of the royal robes, -now saturated with bloodshed. Flung from the palace-tower, -her body had fallen in the open space just outside -the walls—what is called "the mounds" of an Eastern -city. In the strange carelessness of sanitation which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_124" id="Page_124">[Pg 124]</a></span> -describes as "fate" even the visitation of an avoidable -pestilence, all sorts of offal are shot into this vacant -space to fester in the tropic heat. I myself have seen -the pariah dogs and the vultures feeding on a ghastly -dead horse in a ruined space within the street of Beit-Dejun; -and the dogs and the vultures—"those national -undertakers"—had done their work unbidden on the -corpse of the Tyrian queen. When men went to bury -her, they only found a few dog-mumbled bones—the -skull, and the feet, and the palms of the hands.<a name="FNanchor_194_194" id="FNanchor_194_194"></a><a href="#Footnote_194_194" class="fnanchor">[194]</a> They -brought the news to Jehu as he rested after his feast. -It did not by any means discompose him. He at once -recognised that another levin-bolt had fallen from the -thunder-crash of Elijah's prophecy, and he troubled -himself about the matter no further. Her carcase, as -the man of God had prophesied, had become as dung -upon the face of the field, so that none could say, -"This is Jezebel."<a name="FNanchor_195_195" id="FNanchor_195_195"></a><a href="#Footnote_195_195" class="fnanchor">[195]</a></p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_125" id="Page_125">[Pg 125]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XII" id="CHAPTER_XII">CHAPTER XII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>JEHU ESTABLISHED ON THE THRONE</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 842-814</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> x. 1-17</h4> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"The devil can quote Scripture for his purpose."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 28em;"><span class="smcap">Shakespeare.</span></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>But the work of Jehu was not yet over. He was -established at Jezreel; he was lord of the palace -and seraglio of his master; the army of Israel was with -him. But who could be sure that no civil war would -arise, as between the partisans of Zimri and Omri, as -between Omri and Tibni? Ahab, first of the kings of -Israel, had left many sons. There were no less than -seventy of these princes at Samaria. Might there not -be among them some youth of greater courage and -capacity than the murdered Jehoram? And could it -be anticipated that the late dynasty was so utterly unfortunate -and execrated as to have none left to do them -reverence, or to strike one blow on their behalf, after -more than half a century of undisputed sway?<a name="FNanchor_196_196" id="FNanchor_196_196"></a><a href="#Footnote_196_196" class="fnanchor">[196]</a> Jehu's -<i>coup de main</i> had been brilliantly successful. In one -day he had leapt into the throne. But Samaria was -strong upon its watch-tower hill. It was full of Ahab's -sons, and had not yet declared on Jehu's side. It might<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_126" id="Page_126">[Pg 126]</a></span> -be expected to feel some gratitude to the dynasty -which Jehu had supplanted, seeing that it owed to the -grandfather of the king whom he had just slain its very -existence as the capital of Israel.</p> - -<p>He would put a bold face on his usurpation, and -strike while the iron was hot. He would not rouse -opposition by seeming to assume that Samaria would -accept his rebellion. He therefore wrote a letter to the -rulers of Samaria<a name="FNanchor_197_197" id="FNanchor_197_197"></a><a href="#Footnote_197_197" class="fnanchor">[197]</a>—which was but a journey of nine -hours' distance from Jezreel—and to the guardians of -the young princes, reminding them that they were -masters in a strong city, protected with its own contingent -of chariots and horses, and well supplied with -armour. He suggested that they should select the most -promising of Ahab's sons, make him king, and begin a -civil war on his behalf.</p> - -<p>The event showed how prudent was this line of conduct. -As yet Jehu had not transferred the army from -Ramoth-Gilead. He had doubtless taken good care to -prevent intelligence of his plans from reaching the -adherents of Jehoram in Samaria. To them the -unknown was the terrible. All they knew was that -"Behold, two kings stood not before him!" The army -must have sanctioned his revolt: what chance had -they? As for loyalty and affection, if ever they had -existed towards this hapless dynasty, they had vanished -like a dream. The people of Samaria and Jezreel had -once been obedient as sheep to the iron dominance of -Jezebel. They had tolerated her idol-abominations, -and the insolence of her army of dark-browed priests.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_127" id="Page_127">[Pg 127]</a></span> -They had not risen to defend the prophets of Jehovah, -and had suffered even Elijah, twice over, to be forced -to flee for his life. They had borne, hitherto without -a murmur, the tragedies, the sieges, the famines, the -humiliations, with which during these reigns they had -been familiar. And was not Jehovah against the -waning fortunes of the Beni-Omri? Elijah had -undoubtedly cursed them, and now the curse was -falling. Jehu must doubtless have let it be known that -he was only carrying out the behest of their own citizen -the great Elisha, who had sent to him the anointing oil. -They could find abundant excuses to justify their -defection from the old house, and they sent to the -terrible man a message of almost abject submission:—Let -him do as he would; they would make no king: -they were his servants, and would do his bidding.</p> - -<p>Jehu was not likely to be content with verbal or even -written promises. He determined, with cynical subtlety, -to make them put a very bloody sign-manual to their -treaty, by implicating them irrevocably in his rebellion. -He wrote them a second mandate.</p> - -<p>"If," he said, "ye accept my rule, prove it by your -obedience. Cut off the heads of your master's sons, -and see that they are brought to me here to-morrow -by yourselves before the evening."</p> - -<p>The ruthless order was fulfilled to the letter by the -terrified traitors. The king's sons were with their -tutors, the lords of the city. On the very morning that -Jehu's second missive arrived, every one of these poor -guiltless youths was unceremoniously beheaded. The -hideous, bleeding trophies were packed in fig-baskets -and sent to Jezreel.<a name="FNanchor_198_198" id="FNanchor_198_198"></a><a href="#Footnote_198_198" class="fnanchor">[198]</a></p> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_128" id="Page_128">[Pg 128]</a></span></p> -<p>When Jehu was informed of this revolting present -it was evening, and he was sitting at a meal with his -friends.<a name="FNanchor_199_199" id="FNanchor_199_199"></a><a href="#Footnote_199_199" class="fnanchor">[199]</a> He did not trouble himself to rise from his -feast or to look at "death made proud by pure and -princely beauty." He knew that those seventy heads -could only be the heads of the royal youths. He -issued a cool and brutal order that they should be -piled in two heaps<a name="FNanchor_200_200" id="FNanchor_200_200"></a><a href="#Footnote_200_200" class="fnanchor">[200]</a> until the morning on either side -the entrance of the city gates. Were they watched? -or were the dogs and vultures and hynas again left -to do their work upon them? We do not know. In -any case it was a scene of brutal barbarism such as -might have been witnessed in living memory in Khiva -or Bokhara;<a name="FNanchor_201_201" id="FNanchor_201_201"></a><a href="#Footnote_201_201" class="fnanchor">[201]</a> nor must we forget that even in the last -century the heads of the brave and the noble rotted on -Westminster Hall and Temple Bar, and over the Gate -of York, and over the Tolbooth at Edinburgh, and on -Wexford Bridge.</p> - -<p>The day dawned, and all the people were gathered -at the gate, which was the scene of justice. With the -calmest air imaginable the warrior came out to them, -and stood between the mangled heads of those who -but yesterday had been the pampered minions of -fortune and luxury. His speech was short and politic -in its brutality. "Be yourselves the judges," he said. -"Ye are righteous. Jezebel called me a Zimri. Yes! -I conspired against my master and slew him: but"—and -here he casually pointed to the horrible, bleeding -heaps—"who smote all these?" The people of Jezreel<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_129" id="Page_129">[Pg 129]</a></span> -and the lords of Samaria were not only passive -witnesses of his rebellion; they were active sharers in -it. They had dabbled their hands in the same blood. -Now they could not choose but accept his dynasty: -for who was there besides himself? And then, changing -his tone, he does not offer "the tyrant's devilish -plea, necessity," to cloak his atrocities, but—like a -Romish inquisitor of Seville or Granada—claims Divine -sanction for his sanguinary violence. This was not -<i>his</i> doing. He was but an instrument in the hands of -fate. Jehovah is alone responsible. He is doing what -He spake by His servant Elijah. Yes! and there was -yet more to do; for no word of Jehovah's shall fall to -the ground.</p> - -<p>With the same cynical ruthlessness, and cold indifference -to smearing his robes in the blood of the slain, -he carried out to the bitter end his task of policy which -he gilded with the name of Divine justice. Not content -with slaying Ahab's sons, he set himself to extirpate -his race, and slew all who remained to him in Jezreel, -not only his kith and kin, but every lord and every -Baal-priest who favoured his house, until he left him -none remaining.</p> - -<p>But what a frightful picture do these scenes furnish -us of the state of religion and even of civilisation in -Jezreel! There was this man-eating tiger of a king -wallowing in the blood of princes, and enacting scenes -which remind us of Dahomey and Ashantee, or of -some Tartary khanate where human hands are told -out in the market-place after some avenging raid. -And amid all this savagery, squalor, and Turkish -atrocity, the man pleads the sanction of Jehovah, and -claims, unrebuked, that he is only carrying out the -behests of Jehovah's prophets! It is not until long<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_130" id="Page_130">[Pg 130]</a></span> -afterwards that the voice of a prophet is heard repudiating -his plea and denouncing his bloodthirstiness.</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"An evil soul producing holy witness<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Is like a villain with a smiling cheek—<br /></span> -<span class="i1">A goodly apple rotten at the core."<br /></span> -</div></div> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_131" id="Page_131">[Pg 131]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XIII" id="CHAPTER_XIII">CHAPTER XIII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>FRESH MURDERS—THE EXTIRPATION OF BAAL-WORSHIP</i> -(<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 842)</h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> x. 12-28</h4> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"Jhu, sur les hauts lieux, enfin osant offrir</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">Un tmraire encens que Dieu ne peut souffrir,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">N'a pour servir sa cause et venger ses injures</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">Ni le cœur assez droit, ni les mains assez pures."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 30.5em;"><span class="smcap">Racine.</span></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>After such abject subservience had been shown -him by the lords of Samaria and Jezreel, Jehu -evidently had no further shadow of apprehension. He -seems to have loved blood for its own sake—to have -been seized by a vertigo of blood-poisoning. Having -waded through slaughter to a throne, he loved to wash -his footsteps in the blood of the slain, and to stretch -to the very uttermost—to stretch until it cracked all -its ravelled threads—the Divine sanction claimed by his -fanaticism or his hypocrisy.</p> - -<p>When he had finished his massacres at Jezreel, he -went to Samaria. It was only a journey of a few -hours. On the high road he met a company of travellers, -whose escort and rich apparel showed that they -were persons of importance. They were about to halt, -perhaps for refreshment, at the shearing-house of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_132" id="Page_132">[Pg 132]</a></span> -shepherds—the place in which the sheep were gathered -before they were shorn.<a name="FNanchor_203_203" id="FNanchor_203_203"></a><a href="#Footnote_203_203" class="fnanchor">[203]</a></p> - -<p>"Who are ye?" he asked.</p> - -<p>They answered that they were princes of the house -of Judah, the brethren of Ahaziah,<a name="FNanchor_204_204" id="FNanchor_204_204"></a><a href="#Footnote_204_204" class="fnanchor">[204]</a> on their way to -see the two kings at Jezreel, and to salute their cousins, -the children of Jehoram, and their kinsfolk the children -of Jezebel the Gebrah.<a name="FNanchor_205_205" id="FNanchor_205_205"></a><a href="#Footnote_205_205" class="fnanchor">[205]</a> The answer sealed their fate. -Jehu ordered his followers to take them alive. At -first he had not decided what he would do with them. -But half measures had now become impossible. This -cavalcade of princes little knew that they were on their -way to greet the dead children of a dead king and a -dead queen. Jehu felt that the possibilities of an endless -<i>vendetta</i> must be quenched in blood. He gave -orders to slay them, and there in one hour forty-two -more scions of the royal houses of Judah and Israel -were done to death.<a name="FNanchor_206_206" id="FNanchor_206_206"></a><a href="#Footnote_206_206" class="fnanchor">[206]</a> With the usual reckless insouciance -of the East, where any tank or well is made -the natural receptacle for corpses regardless of ultimate -consequences, their bodies were flung into the cistern -of the shearing-house, in which the sheep were washed -before shearing, just as the bodies of Gedaliah's followers -were flung by Ishmael into the well at Mizpah, -and the bodies of our own murdered countrymen were<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_133" id="Page_133">[Pg 133]</a></span> -flung into the well of Cawnpore. He did not leave -one of them alive.</p> - -<p>Thus Jehu "murdered two kings, and one hundred -and twelve princes, and gave Queen Jezebel to dogs -to eat; and if priests had but noticed how even Hosea -condemns and denounces his savagery, they would have -abstained from some of their glorifications of assassins -and butchers, nor would they have appealed to this -man's hideous example, as they have done, to excuse -some of their own revolting atrocities."<a name="FNanchor_207_207" id="FNanchor_207_207"></a><a href="#Footnote_207_207" class="fnanchor">[207]</a> But</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i16">"Crime was ne'er so black<br /></span> -<span class="i0">As ghostly cheer and pious thanks to lack.<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Satan is modest. At heaven's door he lays<br /></span> -<span class="i0">His evil offspring, and in Scriptural phrase<br /></span> -<span class="i0">And saintly posture gives to God the praise<br /></span> -<span class="i0">And honour of his monstrous progeny."<a name="FNanchor_208_208" id="FNanchor_208_208"></a><a href="#Footnote_208_208" class="fnanchor">[208]</a><br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>One cruel deed more or less was nothing to Jehu. -Leaving this tank choked with death and incarnadined -with royal blood, he went on his way as if nothing -particular had happened. He had not proceeded far -when he saw a man well known to him, and of a spirit -kindred to his own. It was the Arab ascetic and -Nazarite Jehonadab, the son of Rechab (or "The -Rider"), the chief of the tribe of Kenites who had flung -in their lot with the children of Israel since the days of -Moses.<a name="FNanchor_209_209" id="FNanchor_209_209"></a><a href="#Footnote_209_209" class="fnanchor">[209]</a> It was the tribe which had produced a Jael; -and Jehonadab had something of the fierce, fanatical<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_134" id="Page_134">[Pg 134]</a></span> -spirit of the ancient chieftainess, who, in her own tent, -had dashed out with the tent-peg the brains of Sisera. -His very name, "The Lord is noble," indicated that he -was a worshipper of Jehovah, and his fierce zeal showed -him to be a genuine Kenite. Disgusted with the -wickedness of cities, disgusted above all with the -loathly vice of drunkenness, which, as we see from -the contemporary prophets, had begun in this age to -acquire fresh prominence in luxurious and wealthy -communities, he exacted of his sons a solemn oath that -neither they nor their successors would drink wine nor -strong drink, and that, shunning the squalor and -corruption of cities, they would live in tents, as their -nomad ancestors had done in the days when Jethro and -Hobab were princes of pastoral Midian. We learn -from Jeremiah, nearly two and a half centuries later, -how faithfully that oath had been observed; and how, -in spite of all temptation, the vow of abstinence was -maintained, even when the strain of foreign invasion -had driven the Rechabites into Jerusalem from their -desolated pastures.<a name="FNanchor_210_210" id="FNanchor_210_210"></a><a href="#Footnote_210_210" class="fnanchor">[210]</a></p> - -<p>Jehu knew that the stern fanaticism of the Kenite -Emr would rejoice in his exterminating zeal, and he -recognised that the friendship and countenance of this -"good man and just," as Josephus calls him, would add -strength to his cause, and enable him to carry out his -dark design. He therefore blessed him.<a name="FNanchor_211_211" id="FNanchor_211_211"></a><a href="#Footnote_211_211" class="fnanchor">[211]</a></p> - -<p>"Is thine heart right with my heart, as my heart is -with thy heart?" he asked, after he had returned the -greeting of Jehonadab.</p> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_135" id="Page_135">[Pg 135]</a></span></p> -<p>"It is, it is!" answered the vehement Rechabite.<a name="FNanchor_212_212" id="FNanchor_212_212"></a><a href="#Footnote_212_212" class="fnanchor">[212]</a></p> - -<p>"Then give me thy hand," he said; and grasping -the Arab by the hand,<a name="FNanchor_213_213" id="FNanchor_213_213"></a><a href="#Footnote_213_213" class="fnanchor">[213]</a> he pulled him up into his -chariot—the highest distinction he could bestow upon -him—and bade him come and witness his zeal for -Jehovah.</p> - -<p>His first task on arriving at Samaria was to tear -up the last fibres of Ahab's kith and destroy all his -partisans. This was indeed to push to a self-interested -extreme the denunciation which had been pronounced -upon Ahab; but the crime helped to secure his fiercely -founded throne.</p> - -<p>One deep-seated plot was yet unaccomplished. It -was the total extermination of Baal-worship. To drive -out for ever this orgiastic, corrupt, and alien idolatry -was right; but there is nothing to show that Jehu -would have been unable to effect this purpose by one -stern decree, together with the destruction of Baal's -images and temple. A method so simply righteous did -not suit this Nero-Torquemada, who seemed to be never -happy unless he united Jesuitical cunning with the -pouring out of rivers of massacre.</p> - -<p>He summoned the people together; and as though -he now threw off all pretence of zeal for orthodoxy, -he proclaimed that Ahab had served Baal a little, but -Jehu would serve him much. The Samaritans must -have been endowed with infinite gullibility if they -could suppose that the king who had ridden into the -city side by side with such a man as Jehonadab—"the -warrior in his coat of mail, the ascetic in his shirt of -hair"—who had already exhibited an unfathomable<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_136" id="Page_136">[Pg 136]</a></span> -cunning, and had swept away the Baal-priests of -Jezreel, was indeed sincere in this new conversion.<a name="FNanchor_214_214" id="FNanchor_214_214"></a><a href="#Footnote_214_214" class="fnanchor">[214]</a> -Perhaps they felt it dangerous to question the sincerity -of kings. The Baal-worshippers of former days were -known, and Jehu proclaimed that if any one of them was -missing at the great sacrifice which he intended to offer -to Baal he should be put to death. A solemn assembly -to Baal was proclaimed, and every apostate from God to -nature-worship from all Israel was present, till the -idol's temple was thronged from end to end.<a name="FNanchor_215_215" id="FNanchor_215_215"></a><a href="#Footnote_215_215" class="fnanchor">[215]</a> To add -splendour to the solemnity, Jehu bade the wardrobe-keeper -to bring out all the rich vestments of Tyrian -dye and Sidonian broidery, and clothe the worshippers.<a name="FNanchor_216_216" id="FNanchor_216_216"></a><a href="#Footnote_216_216" class="fnanchor">[216]</a> -Solemnly advancing to the altar with the Rechabite by -his side, he warned the assembly to see that their -gathering was not polluted by the presence of a single -known worshipper of Jehovah. Then, apparently, he -still further disarmed suspicion by taking a personal -part in offering the burnt-offering. Meanwhile, he had -surrounded the temple and blocked every exit with -eighty armed warriors, and had threatened that any<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_137" id="Page_137">[Pg 137]</a></span> -one of them should be put to death if he let a single -Baal-worshipper escape. When he had finished the -offering,<a name="FNanchor_217_217" id="FNanchor_217_217"></a><a href="#Footnote_217_217" class="fnanchor">[217]</a> he went forth, and bade his soldiers enter, -and slay, and slay, and slay till none were left. Then -flinging the corpses in a heap, they made their way -to the fortress of the Temple, where some of the priests -may have taken refuge. They dragged out and burnt -the <i>matstseboth</i> of Baal,<a name="FNanchor_218_218" id="FNanchor_218_218"></a><a href="#Footnote_218_218" class="fnanchor">[218]</a> broke down the great central -idol, and utterly dismantled the whole building. To -complete the pollution of the dishallowed shrine, he -made it a common midden for Samaria, which it continued -to be for centuries afterwards.<a name="FNanchor_219_219" id="FNanchor_219_219"></a><a href="#Footnote_219_219" class="fnanchor">[219]</a> It was his last -voluntary massacre. The House of Ahab was no -more. Baal-worship in Israel never survived that -exterminating blow.</p> - -<p>Happily for the human race, such atrocities committed -in the name of religion have not been common. In -Pagan history we have but few instances, except the -slaughter of the Magians at the beginning of the reign -of Darius, son of Hystaspes. Alas that other parallels -should be furnished by the abominable tyranny of a -false Christianity, blessed and incited by popes and -priests! The persecutions and massacres of the Albigenses, -preached by Arnold of Citeaux, and instigated -by Pope Innocent III.; the expulsion of the Jews from -Spain; the deadly work of Torquemada; the murderous -furies of Alva among the hapless Netherlanders, urged -and approved by Pope Pius V.; the massacre of St.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_138" id="Page_138">[Pg 138]</a></span> -Bartholomew, for which Pope Gregory and his cardinals -sang their horrible Te Deum in their desecrated shrines,—these -are the parallels to the deeds of Jehu. He -has found his chief imitators among the votaries of a -blood-stained and usurping sacerdotalism, which has -committed so many crimes and inflicted so many -horrors on mankind.</p> - -<p>And did God approve all this detestable mixture of -zealous enthusiasm with lying deceit and the insatiate -thirst of blood?</p> - -<p>If right be right, and wrong be wrong, the answer -must not be an elaborate subterfuge, but an uncompromising -"No!" We need be under no doubt on that -subject. Christ Himself reproved His Apostles for -savage zealotry, and taught them that the Elijah-spirit -was not the Christ-spirit. Nor is the Elisha-spirit the -Christian spirit any the more if these deeds of hypocrisy -and blood were in any sense approved by him who is -sometimes regarded as the mild and gentle Elisha. -Where was he? Why was he silent? Could he -possibly approve of this murderer's fury? We do -not, indeed, know how far Elisha lent his sanction to -anything more than the general end. Ahab's house -had been doomed to vengeance by the voice which -gave utterance to the verdict of the national conscience. -The doom was just; Jehu was ordained to be the -executioner. In no other way could the judgment be -carried out. The times were not sentimental. The -murder of Jehoram was not regarded as an act of -tyrannicide, but of divinely commissioned justice. -Elisha <i>may</i> have shrunk from the unreined furies of -the man whom he had sent his emissary to anoint. -On the other hand, we have not the least proof that -he did so. He partook, probably, of the wild spirit of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_139" id="Page_139">[Pg 139]</a></span> -the times, when such deeds were regarded with feelings -very different from the abhorrence with which we, -better taught by the spirit of love, and more enlightened -by the widening dawn of history, now justly regard -them. No remonstrance of <i>contemporary</i> prophecy, -however faint, is recorded as having been uttered -against the doings of Jehu. The fact that, several -centuries later, they could be recorded by the historian -without a syllable of reprobation shows that the education -of nations in the lessons of righteousness is slow, -and that we are still amid the annals of the deep night -of moral imperfection. But the nation was on the eve -of purer teaching, and in the prophets Amos and Hosea -we read the clear condemnation of deeds of cruelty in -general, and specially of the king who felt no pity. -Amos condemns even the idolatrous King of Edom, -"because he did pursue his brother with the sword, -and did cast off all pity, and his anger did tear perpetually, -and he kept his wrath for ever."<a name="FNanchor_220_220" id="FNanchor_220_220"></a><a href="#Footnote_220_220" class="fnanchor">[220]</a> He condemns -no less severely the Chemosh-worshipping King -of Moab even for an insult done to the dead: "Because -he burned the bones of the King of Edom into lime."<a name="FNanchor_221_221" id="FNanchor_221_221"></a><a href="#Footnote_221_221" class="fnanchor">[221]</a> -Jehu had warred pitilessly upon the living, and had -shamelessly insulted the dead. He had flung the heads -of seventy princes in two bleeding heaps on the common -road for all eyes to stare upon, and he had polluted -the cistern of Beth-equed-haroim with the dead bodies -of forty-two youths of the royal house of Judah. He -might plead that he was but carrying out to the full -the commission of Jehovah, imposed upon him by -Elisha; but Hosea, a century later, gives God's message -against his house: "Yet a little while, and I will avenge<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_140" id="Page_140">[Pg 140]</a></span> -the blood of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu, and will -cause to cease the kingdom of the house of Israel."<a name="FNanchor_222_222" id="FNanchor_222_222"></a><a href="#Footnote_222_222" class="fnanchor">[222]</a></p> - -<p>Nay, more! If, as is possible, the ghastly story of -the siege of Samaria, narrated in the memoirs of Elisha, -is displaced, and if it really belongs to the reign of -Jehoahaz ben-Jehu, then Elisha himself brands the -cruelty of the rushing thunderbolt of vengeance which -his own hand had launched. For he calls the unnamed -"King of Israel" "the son of a murderer."</p> - -<p>Men who are swords of God, and human executioners -of Divine justice, may easily deceive themselves. God -works the ends of His own providence, and He uses -their ministry. "The fierceness of man shall turn to -Thy praise, and the fierceness of them shalt Thou -refrain."<a name="FNanchor_223_223" id="FNanchor_223_223"></a><a href="#Footnote_223_223" class="fnanchor">[223]</a> But they can never make their plea of prophetic -sanction a cloak of maliciousness. Cromwell had -stern work to do. Rightly or wrongly, he deemed it -inevitable, and did not shrink from it. But he hated it. -Over and over again, he tells us, he had prayed to God -that He would not put him to this work. To the best -of his power he avoided, he minimised, every act of -vengeance, even when the sternness of his Puritan sense -of righteousness made him look on it as duty. Far -different was the case of Jehu. He loved murder and -cunning for their own sakes, and, like Joab, he dyed -the garments of peace with the blood of war.</p> - -<p>How little was his gain! It had been happier for -him if he had never mounted higher than the captaincy -of the host, or even so high. He reigned for twenty-eight -years (842-814)—longer than any king except his -great-grandson Jeroboam II.; and in recognition of any -element of righteousness which had actuated his revolt,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_141" id="Page_141">[Pg 141]</a></span> -his children, even to the fourth generation, were suffered -to sit upon the throne. His dynasty lasted for one -hundred and thirteen years.<a name="FNanchor_224_224" id="FNanchor_224_224"></a><a href="#Footnote_224_224" class="fnanchor">[224]</a> But his own reign was -only memorable for defeat, trouble, and irreparable -disaster.</p> - -<p>For Hazael, who had seized the throne of his murdered -lord Benhadad, was a fierce and able warrior. -He held his own against the overweening might of his -northern neighbour Assyria; and whenever he obtained -a respite from this desperate warfare, he indemnified -himself for all losses by enlarging his dominion out of -the territories of the Ten Tribes. "In those days the -Lord began to cut Israel short, and Hazael smote them -in all the borders of Israel." Jehu had the mortification -of seeing the fairest and most fruitful regions of his -dominion, those which had belonged to Israel from the -most ancient times, wrenched out of his grasp. From -this time forwards Israel lost half the fair Promised -Land which God had given to their fathers. It was -the beginning of the end. Henceforth the tribal inheritance -of Reuben, Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh -was an oppressed dependency of Aram. Hazael overran -and annexed the land of Bashan from the spurs -of Mount Hermon to the Lake of Gennezareth; Gaulan, -and volcanic Argob, and Hauran the entire ancient -kingdom of Og, King of Bashan, with all the herds and -pasture-lands. Southward of this he seized the whole -forest-clad plateau of Gilead, with its lovely ravines, -north of the Jabbok, the territory of Gad; and pushing<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_142" id="Page_142">[Pg 142]</a></span> -still southward, established his sway over the district, -of the Ammonites and the tribe of Reuben, as far as -the city of Aroer, on the other side of the great chasm -of Arnon (Wady Mojib). All the fatness of Bashan -and Rabbah with her watery plain of the Beni-Ammon, -and the grass-covered uplands which fed the enormous -flocks of Mesha, the great Emr and sheep-master of -Moab, passed from Israel to Syria, never to be recovered. -What made the humiliation more terrible was that the -invasion and conquest were accompanied with acts of -unwonted cruelty. Elisha had wept to think what -evil Hazael would do the children of Israel<a name="FNanchor_225_225" id="FNanchor_225_225"></a><a href="#Footnote_225_225" class="fnanchor">[225]</a>—how he -would set their strongholds on fire, and slay their -young men with the sword, and dash in pieces their -little ones, and rip up their women with child. These -atrocities were in those horrible days the ordinary -incidents of warfare;<a name="FNanchor_226_226" id="FNanchor_226_226"></a><a href="#Footnote_226_226" class="fnanchor">[226]</a> but Hazael seems to have been -pre-eminent in brutal fierceness. It was this which -called down on him and his people the "burdens" -of Amos. "Thus saith the Lord; For three transgressions -of Damascus, and for four, I will not turn -away the punishment thereof; because they have -threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron: -but I will send a fire into the house of Hazael, which -shall devour the palaces of Benhadad."<a name="FNanchor_227_227" id="FNanchor_227_227"></a><a href="#Footnote_227_227" class="fnanchor">[227]</a></p> - -<p>We can imagine rather than describe the anguish -of Jehu when he was compelled to look impotently on, -while his powerful Syrian neighbour laid waste his -dominion with fire and sword, and the cry of his -despoiled and slaughtered subjects was uplifted to him -in vain. Nor was this all. Emboldened by these reverses,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_143" id="Page_143">[Pg 143]</a></span> -a host of other enemies, once subjugated and -despised, began to wreak their revenge and insolence -on humbled Israel. The Philistines eagerly undertook -the sale of the wretched captives who were brought -to them in gangs from the burnt Trans-Jordanic towns.<a name="FNanchor_228_228" id="FNanchor_228_228"></a><a href="#Footnote_228_228" class="fnanchor">[228]</a> -The old "brotherly covenant" with the Tyrian, which had -once been formed by Solomon, and had been cemented -by the marriage of Jezebel with Ahab, was cancelled -by Jehu's insults, and the Tyrians emulously outbad the -Philistines in the purchase of Israelitish slaves. The -Edomites and the Ammonites also helped Hazael in his -marauding raids, and enlarged their own domains at -the expense of Samaria. Such insults and humiliations -might well go far to break the heart of an impetuous -and warrior-king.</p> - -<p>Of Jehu the Books of Kings and Chronicles have -no more to tell us, but we gain fresh insight into his -degradation from the Black Obelisk of Shalmaneser II. -(860-824), now in the British Museum. From the -inscription we find that, in 842, Jehu—"the son of -Omri," as he is erroneously called—was one of the -vassal kings who subjected themselves to the Assyrian -conqueror,<a name="FNanchor_229_229" id="FNanchor_229_229"></a><a href="#Footnote_229_229" class="fnanchor">[229]</a> and sent him tribute, which may have -euphemistically passed under the name of presents.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_144" id="Page_144">[Pg 144]</a></span> -The despot of Nineveh twice speaks of it as a tribute. -On this obelisk we see a picture of Jehu's ambassadors—perhaps -of Jehu himself. On the left stands the -Assyrian King with the winged circle over his head. He -holds a beaker of wine in his hand, and two eunuchs -stand behind him, one of whom covers him with a -sunshade. Before him kneels and grovels in adoration -the Jewish King, with his beard sweeping the ground. -In long array behind him come his servants—first two -eunuchs, then a number of bearded figures, who carry -the tribute. They are dressed in long richly fringed -robes, exactly resembling those of the Assyrians themselves, -and they wear shoes which turn up at the toes. -They are carrying figures of gold and silver, goblets, -golden vessels, ingots of precious metals, spear-shafts, -a kingly sceptre, baskets, bags, and trays of treasure, -the contribution of which must have fallen with crushing -weight on the impoverished kingdom.<a name="FNanchor_230_230" id="FNanchor_230_230"></a><a href="#Footnote_230_230" class="fnanchor">[230]</a></p> - -<p>This tribute must have been sent in 842, the -eighteenth year of Shalmaneser II.'s reign. Doubtless -Jehu thought he might be delivered from his furious -neighbour Hazael by propitiating the Northern tyrant, -who at the same time received the submission of the -Tyrians and Sidonians. But if so, Jehu's hopes were -dashed to the ground. Shalmaneser was the enemy -of Hazael (Ha-sa-ilu), who had gone out to meet him -at Antilibanus, and there had fought a desperate battle. -The Syrian King was routed, and driven back, and -Shalmaneser had besieged Damascus. But he had -failed to take it, and indeed had not troubled Syria -again till 832, when he made an excursion of minor -importance. His troubles on the north and east of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_145" id="Page_145">[Pg 145]</a></span> -Assyria had diverted his attention from Damascus; -and this, together with the inferiority of his son -Samsiniras (<i>d.</i> 811), had given Hazael a free hand to -avenge himself on Israel as the ally of Assyria. Of -Jehu we hear no more. After his long reign of twenty-eight -years he slept with his fathers, and was buried -in Samaria, and Jehoahaz his son reigned in his stead. -Savage as had been his measures, his victory over -alien idolatries was by no means complete. What -Micah calls "the statutes of Omri, and the works of -the House of Ahab,"<a name="FNanchor_231_231" id="FNanchor_231_231"></a><a href="#Footnote_231_231" class="fnanchor">[231]</a> were still kept; and men, both in -Israel and Judah, walked in their old sins. Even in -the reign of Jehu's own son Jehoahaz there still -remained in Samaria the Asherah, or tree consecrated -to the nature-goddess, which Jehu seems to have put -away, but not to have destroyed.<a name="FNanchor_232_232" id="FNanchor_232_232"></a><a href="#Footnote_232_232" class="fnanchor">[232]</a> As he grovelled in -the dust before Shalmaneser, did no memory of his -own ferocities darken his humiliated soul? Must not -he, like our Henry II., have been inclined to utter the -wailing cry, "Shame, shame on a conquered king!"</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_146" id="Page_146">[Pg 146]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XIV" id="CHAPTER_XIV">CHAPTER XIV</a></h2> - -<h3><i>ATHALIAH</i> (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 842-836)—<i>JOASH BEN-AHAZIAH OF -JUDAH</i> (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 836-796)</h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xi. 1-xii. 21</h4> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"Par cette fin terrible, et due ses forfaits,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">Apprenez, Roi des Juifs, et n'oubliez jamais,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">Que les rois dans le ciel ont un juge sevre,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">L'innocence un vengeur, et les orphelins un pre!"</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 27em;"><span class="smcap">Racine</span>, <i>Athalie</i>.</span><br /> -</p> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"Regardless of the sweeping whirlwind's sway,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">That, hushed in grim repose, expects its evening prey."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 30em;"><span class="smcap">Gray.</span></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>Before we follow the destinies of the House -of Jehu we must revert to Judah, and watch -the final consequences of ruin which came in the train -of Ahab's Tyrian marriage, and brought murder and -idolatry into Judah, as well as into Israel.</p> - -<p>Athaliah, who, as queen-mother, was more powerful -than the queen-consort (<i>malekkah</i>), was the true -daughter of Jezebel. She exhibits the same undaunted -fierceness, the same idolatrous fanaticism, the same -swift resolution, the same cruel and unscrupulous -wickedness.</p> - -<p>It might have been supposed that the miserable -disease of her husband Jehoram, followed so speedily -by the murder, after one year's reign, of her son -Ahaziah, might have exercised over her character the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_147" id="Page_147">[Pg 147]</a></span> -softening influence of misfortune. On the contrary, she -only saw in these events a short path to the consummation -of her ambition.</p> - -<p>Under Jehoram she had been queen: under Ahaziah -she had exercised still more powerful influence as -Gebrah, and had asserted her sway alike over her -husband and over her son, whose counsellor she was -to do wickedly. It was far from her intention tamely -to sink from her commanding position into the abject -nullity of an aged and despised dowager in a dull -provincial seraglio. She even thought that</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"To reign is worth ambition, though in hell;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>The royal family of the House of David, numerous -and flourishing as it once was, had recently been -decimated by cruel catastrophes. Jehoram, instigated -probably by his heathen wife, had killed his six younger -brothers.<a name="FNanchor_233_233" id="FNanchor_233_233"></a><a href="#Footnote_233_233" class="fnanchor">[233]</a> Later on, the Arabs and Philistines, in their -insulting invasion, had not only plundered his palace, -but had carried away his sons; so that, according to -the Chronicler, "there was never a son left him, save -Jehoahaz [<i>i.e.</i>, Ahaziah], the youngest of his sons."<a name="FNanchor_234_234" id="FNanchor_234_234"></a><a href="#Footnote_234_234" class="fnanchor">[234]</a> -He may have had other sons after that invasion; and -Ahaziah had left children, who must all, however, have -been very young, since he was only twenty-two or -twenty-three when Jehu's servants murdered him. -Athaliah might naturally have hoped for the regency; -but this did not content her. When she saw that her -son Ahaziah was dead, "she arose and destroyed all the -seed royal." In those days the life of a child was but -little thought of; and it weighed less than nothing with -Athaliah that these innocents were her grandchildren.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_148" id="Page_148">[Pg 148]</a></span> -She killed all of whose existence she was aware, and -boldly seized the crown. No queen had ever reigned -alone either in Israel or in Judah. Judah must have -sunk very low, and the talents of Athaliah must have -been commanding, or she could never have established -a precedent hitherto undreamed of, by imposing on the -people of David for six years the yoke of a woman, and -that woman a half-Phœnician idolatress. Yet so it was! -Athaliah, like her cousin Dido, felt herself strong enough -to rule.</p> - -<p>But a woman's ruthlessness was outwitted by a -woman's cunning. Ahaziah had a half-sister on the -father's side,<a name="FNanchor_235_235" id="FNanchor_235_235"></a><a href="#Footnote_235_235" class="fnanchor">[235]</a> the princess Jehosheba, or Jehoshabeath, -who was then or afterwards (we are told) married to -Jehoiada, the high priest.<a name="FNanchor_236_236" id="FNanchor_236_236"></a><a href="#Footnote_236_236" class="fnanchor">[236]</a> The secrets of harems are -hidden deep, and Athaliah may have been purposely -kept in ignorance of the birth to Ahaziah of a little -babe whose mother was Zibiah of Beersheba, and who -had received the name of Joash. If she knew of his -existence, some ruse must have been palmed off upon -her, and she must have been led to believe that he too -had been killed. But he had not been killed. Jehosheba -"stole him from among the king's sons that were slain," -and, with the connivance of his nurse, hid him from the -murderers sent by Athaliah in the palace store-room -in which beds and couches were kept.<a name="FNanchor_237_237" id="FNanchor_237_237"></a><a href="#Footnote_237_237" class="fnanchor">[237]</a> Thence, at the -first favourable moment, she transferred the child and -nurse to one of the chambers in the three storeys of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_149" id="Page_149">[Pg 149]</a></span> -chambers which ran round the Temple, and were -variously used as wardrobes or as dwelling-rooms.</p> - -<p>The hiding-place was safe; for under Athaliah the -Temple of Jehovah fell into neglect and disrepute, and -its resident ministers would not be numerous. It would -not have been difficult, in the seclusion of Eastern life, -for Jehosheba to pass off the babe as her own child -to all but the handful who knew the secret.</p> - -<p>Six years passed away, and the iron hand of Athaliah -still kept the people in subjection. She had boldly -set up in Judah her mother's Baal-worship. Baal had -his temple not far from that of Jehovah; and though -Athaliah did not imitate Jezebel in persecuting the -worshippers of Jehovah, she made her own high priest, -Mattan, a much more important person than Jehoiada -for all who desired to propitiate the favours of the Court.</p> - -<p>Joash had now reached his seventh year, and a -Jewish prince in his seventh year is regarded as something -more than a mere child. Jehoiada thought that -it was time to strike a blow in his favour, and to -deliver him from the dreadful confinement which made -it impossible for him to leave the Temple precincts.</p> - -<p>He began secretly to tamper with the guards both -of the Temple and of the palace. Upon the Levitic -guards, indignant at the intrusion of Baal-worship, -he might securely count, and the Carites and queen's -runners were not likely to be very much devoted to -the rule of the manlike and idolatrous alien-queen. -Taking an oath of them in secrecy, he bound them to -allegiance to the little boy whom he produced from the -Temple chamber as their lawful lord, and the son of -their late king.</p> - -<p>The plot was well laid. There were five captains -of the five hundred royal body-guards, and the priest<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_150" id="Page_150">[Pg 150]</a></span> -secretly enlisted them all in the service.<a name="FNanchor_238_238" id="FNanchor_238_238"></a><a href="#Footnote_238_238" class="fnanchor">[238]</a> The Chronicler -says that he also sent round to all the chief Levites, -and collected them in Jerusalem for the emergency. -The arrangements of the Sabbath gave special facility -to his plans; for on that day only one of the five -divisions of guards mounted watch at the palace, and -the others were set free for the service of the Temple.<a name="FNanchor_239_239" id="FNanchor_239_239"></a><a href="#Footnote_239_239" class="fnanchor">[239]</a> -It had evidently been announced that some great -ceremony would be held in the shrine of Jehovah; for -all the people, we are told, were assembled in the courts -of the house of the Lord. Jehoiada ordered one of the -companies to guard the palace; another to be at the -"gate Sur," or the gate "of the Foundation";<a name="FNanchor_240_240" id="FNanchor_240_240"></a><a href="#Footnote_240_240" class="fnanchor">[240]</a> another -at the gate behind the barracks(?) of the palace-runners, -to be a barrier<a name="FNanchor_241_241" id="FNanchor_241_241"></a><a href="#Footnote_241_241" class="fnanchor">[241]</a> against any incursion from the palace. -Two more were to ensure the safety of the little king -by watching the precincts of the Temple. The Levitic -officers were to protect the king's person with serried -ranks. Jehoiada armed them with spears and shields, -which David had placed as trophies in the porch; and -if any one tried to force his way within their lines he -was to be slain. The only danger to be apprehended -was from any Carite mercenaries, or palace-servants -of the queen: among all others Jehoiada found a widespread -defection. The people, the Levites, even the -soldiers, all hated the Baal-worshipping usurper.<a name="FNanchor_242_242" id="FNanchor_242_242"></a><a href="#Footnote_242_242" class="fnanchor">[242]</a></p> - -<p>At the fateful moment the guards were arranged in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_151" id="Page_151">[Pg 151]</a></span> -two dense lines, beginning from either side of the porch, -till their ranks met beyond the altar, so as to form a -hedge round the royal boy. Into this triangular space -the young prince was led by the high priest, and placed -beside the <i>Matstsebah</i>—some prominent pillar in the -Temple court, either one of Solomon's pillars Jachin -and Boaz, or some special erection of later days.<a name="FNanchor_243_243" id="FNanchor_243_243"></a><a href="#Footnote_243_243" class="fnanchor">[243]</a> -Round him stood the princes of Judah, and there, in -the midst of them, Jehoiada placed the crown upon his -head, and in significant symbol also laid lightly upon -it for a moment "The Testimony"—perhaps the Ten -Commandments and the Book of the Covenant—the -most ancient fragment of the Pentateuch<a name="FNanchor_244_244" id="FNanchor_244_244"></a><a href="#Footnote_244_244" class="fnanchor">[244]</a>—which was -treasured up with the pot of manna inside or in front -of the Ark. Then he poured on the child's head the -consecrated oil, and said, "Let the king live!"</p> - -<p>The completion of the ceremony was marked by the -blare of the rams' horns, the softer blast of the silver -trumpets, and the answering shouts of the soldiers and -the people. The tumult, or the news of it, reached<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_152" id="Page_152">[Pg 152]</a></span> -the ears of Athaliah in the neighbouring palace, and, -with all the undaunted courage of her mother, she -instantly summoned her escort, and went into the -Temple to see for herself what was taking place.<a name="FNanchor_245_245" id="FNanchor_245_245"></a><a href="#Footnote_245_245" class="fnanchor">[245]</a> She -probably mounted the ascent which Solomon had made -from the palace to the Temple court, though it had long -been robbed of its precious metals and scented woods. -She led the way, and thought to overawe by her personal -ascendency any irregularity which might be going -on; for in the deathful hush to which she had reduced -her subjects she does not seem to have dreamt of -rebellion. No sooner had she entered than the guards -closed behind her, excluding and menacing her escort.<a name="FNanchor_246_246" id="FNanchor_246_246"></a><a href="#Footnote_246_246" class="fnanchor">[246]</a></p> - -<p>A glance was sufficient to reveal to her the significance -of the whole scene. There, in royal robes, and -crowned with the royal crown, stood her little unknown -grandson beside the <i>Matstsebah</i>,<a name="FNanchor_247_247" id="FNanchor_247_247"></a><a href="#Footnote_247_247" class="fnanchor">[247]</a> while round him were -the leaders of the people and the trumpeters, and the -multitudes were still rolling their tumult of acclamation -from the court below. In that sight she read her doom. -Rending her clothes, she turned to fly, shrieking, -"Treason! treason!" Then the commands of the -priest rang out: "Keep her between the ranks,<a name="FNanchor_248_248" id="FNanchor_248_248"></a><a href="#Footnote_248_248" class="fnanchor">[248]</a> till -you have got her outside the area of the Temple; and -if any of her guards follow or try to rescue her, kill -him with the sword. But let not the sacred courts -be polluted with her blood." So they made way for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_153" id="Page_153">[Pg 153]</a></span> -her,<a name="FNanchor_249_249" id="FNanchor_249_249"></a><a href="#Footnote_249_249" class="fnanchor">[249]</a> and as she could not escape she passed between -the rows of Levites and soldiers till she had reached -the private chariot-road by which the kings drove to -the precincts.<a name="FNanchor_250_250" id="FNanchor_250_250"></a><a href="#Footnote_250_250" class="fnanchor">[250]</a> There the sword of vengeance fell. -Athaliah disappears from history, and with her the -dark race of Jezebel. But her story lives in the music -of Handel and the verse of Racine.</p> - -<p>This is the only recorded revolution in the history -of Judah. In two later cases a king of Judah was -murdered, but in both instances "the people of the -land" restored the Davidic heir. Life in Judah was -less dramatic and exciting than in Israel, but far more -stable;<a name="FNanchor_251_251" id="FNanchor_251_251"></a><a href="#Footnote_251_251" class="fnanchor">[251]</a> and this, together with comparative immunity -from foreign invasions, constituted an immense advantage.</p> - -<p>Jehoiada, of course, became regent for the young -king, and continued to be his guide for many years, -so that even the king's two wives were selected by -his advice. As the nation had been distracted with -idolatries, he made the covenant between the king and -the people that they should be loyal to each other,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_154" id="Page_154">[Pg 154]</a></span> -and between Jehoiada and the king and the people that -they should be Jehovah's people. Such covenants were -not infrequent in Jewish history. Such a covenant -had been made by Asa<a name="FNanchor_252_252" id="FNanchor_252_252"></a><a href="#Footnote_252_252" class="fnanchor">[252]</a> after Abijam's apostasy, as it -was afterwards made by Hezekiah<a name="FNanchor_253_253" id="FNanchor_253_253"></a><a href="#Footnote_253_253" class="fnanchor">[253]</a> and by Josiah.<a name="FNanchor_254_254" id="FNanchor_254_254"></a><a href="#Footnote_254_254" class="fnanchor">[254]</a> The -new covenant, and the sense of awakenment from the -dream of guilty apostasy, evoked an outburst of spontaneous -enthusiasm in the hearts of the populace. Of -their own impulse they rushed to the temple of Baal -which Athaliah had reared, dismantled it, and smashed -to pieces his altars and images. The riot was only -stained by a single murder. They slew Mattan, -Athaliah's Baal-priest, before the altars of his god.<a name="FNanchor_255_255" id="FNanchor_255_255"></a><a href="#Footnote_255_255" class="fnanchor">[255]</a></p> - -<p>With Jehoiada begins the title of "high priest." -Hitherto no higher name than "the priest" had been -given even to Aaron, or Eli, or Zadok; but thenceforth -the title of "chief priest" is given to his successors, -among whom he inaugurated a new epoch.<a name="FNanchor_256_256" id="FNanchor_256_256"></a><a href="#Footnote_256_256" class="fnanchor">[256]</a></p> - -<p>It was now Jehoiada's object to restore such splendour -and solemnity as he could to the neglected worship of -the Temple, which had suffered in every way from -Baal's encroachments. He did this before the king's -second solemn inauguration. Even the porters had -been done away with, so that the Temple could at any -time be polluted by the presence of the unclean, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_155" id="Page_155">[Pg 155]</a></span> -the whole service of priests and Levites had fallen -into desuetude.</p> - -<p>Then he took the captains, and the Carians, and -the princes, and conducted the boy-king, amid throngs -of his shouting and rejoicing people, from the Temple -to his own palace. There he seated him on the lion-throne -of Solomon his father, in the great hall of -justice, and the city was quiet and the land had rest. -According to the historian, "Joash did right <i>all his -days</i>, because Jehoiada the priest instructed him."<a name="FNanchor_257_257" id="FNanchor_257_257"></a><a href="#Footnote_257_257" class="fnanchor">[257]</a> -The stock addition that "howbeit the <i>bamoth</i> were not -removed, and the people still sacrificed and offered -incense there," is no derogation from the merits of -Joash, and perhaps not even of Jehoiada, since if the -law against the <i>bamoth</i> then existed, it had become -absolutely unknown, and these local sanctuaries were -held to be conducive to true religion.<a name="FNanchor_258_258" id="FNanchor_258_258"></a><a href="#Footnote_258_258" class="fnanchor">[258]</a></p> - -<p>It was natural that the child of the Temple should -have at heart the interests of the Temple in which he -had spent his early days, and to the shelter of which -he owed his life and throne. The sacred house had -been insulted and plundered by persons whom the -Chronicler calls "the sons of Athaliah, that wicked<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_156" id="Page_156">[Pg 156]</a></span> -woman,"<a name="FNanchor_259_259" id="FNanchor_259_259"></a><a href="#Footnote_259_259" class="fnanchor">[259]</a> meaning, probably, her adherents. Not only -had its treasures been robbed to enrich the house of -Baal, but it had been suffered to fall into complete -disrepair. Breaches gaped in the outer walls, and the -very foundations were insecure. The necessity for -restoring it occurred, not, as we should have expected, -to the priests who lived at its altar, but to the boy-king. -He issued an order to the priests that they -should take charge of all the money presented to the -Temple for the hallowed things, all the money paid in -current coin, and all the assessments for various fines -and vows,<a name="FNanchor_260_260" id="FNanchor_260_260"></a><a href="#Footnote_260_260" class="fnanchor">[260]</a> together with every freewill contribution. -They were to have this revenue entirely at their -disposal, and to make themselves responsible for the -necessary repairs. According to the Chronicler, they -were further to raise a subscription throughout the -country from all their personal friends.</p> - -<p>The king's command had been urgent. Money had -at first come in, but nothing was done. Joash had -reached the twenty-third year of his reign, and was -thirty years old; but the Temple remained in its old -sordid condition. The matter is passed over by the -king as lightly, courteously, and considerately as he -could; but if he does not charge the priests with downright -embezzlement, he does reproach them for most -reprehensible neglect. They were the appointed -guardians of the house: why did they suffer its -dilapidations to remain untouched year after year, while -they continued to receive the golden stream which -poured—but now, owing to the disgust of the people,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_157" id="Page_157">[Pg 157]</a></span> -in diminished volume—into their coffers? "Take no -more money, therefore," he said, "from your acquaintances, -but deliver it for the breaches of the house." -For what they had already received he does not call -them to account, but henceforth takes the whole matter -into his own hands. The neglectful priests were to -receive no more contributions, and not to be responsible -for the repairs. Joash, however, ordered Jehoiada to -take a chest and put it beside the altar on the right.<a name="FNanchor_261_261" id="FNanchor_261_261"></a><a href="#Footnote_261_261" class="fnanchor">[261]</a> -All contributions were to be dropped into this chest. -When it was full, it was carried by the Levites unopened -into the palace,<a name="FNanchor_262_262" id="FNanchor_262_262"></a><a href="#Footnote_262_262" class="fnanchor">[262]</a> and there the king's chancellor and -the high priest had the ingots weighed and the money -counted; its value was added up, and it was handed -over immediately to the architects, who paid it to the -carpenters and masons. The priests were left in -possession of the money for the guilt-offerings<a name="FNanchor_263_263" id="FNanchor_263_263"></a><a href="#Footnote_263_263" class="fnanchor">[263]</a> and for -the sin-offerings, but with the rest of the funds they -had nothing to do. In this way was restored the -confidence which the management of the hierarchy had -evidently forfeited, and with renewed confidence in the -administration fresh gifts poured in. Even in the -cautious narrative of the Chronicler it is clear that -the priests hardly came out of these transactions with -flying colours. If their honesty is not formally impugned, -at least their torpor is obvious, as is the fact -that they had wholly failed to inspire the zeal of the -people till the young king took the affair into his own -hands.<a name="FNanchor_264_264" id="FNanchor_264_264"></a><a href="#Footnote_264_264" class="fnanchor">[264]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_158" id="Page_158">[Pg 158]</a></span></p> - -<p>The long reign of Joash ended in eclipse and murder. -If the later tradition be correct, it was also darkened -with atrocious ingratitude and crime.</p> - -<p>For, according to the Chronicler, Jehoiada died at -the advanced age of one hundred and thirty, and was -buried, as an unwonted honour, in the sepulchres of the -kings.<a name="FNanchor_265_265" id="FNanchor_265_265"></a><a href="#Footnote_265_265" class="fnanchor">[265]</a> When he was dead, the princes of Judah -came to Joash, who had now been king for many years, -and with a strange suddenness tempted the zealous -repairer of the Temple of Jehovah into idolatrous -apostasy. With soft speech they seduced him into the -worship of Asherim. It was marvellous indeed if the -child of the Temple became its foe, and he who had -made a covenant with Jehovah fell away to Baalim. -But worse followed. Prophets reproved him, and he -paid them no heed, in spite of "the greatness of the -burdens"—<i>i.e.</i>, the multitude of the menaces—laid upon -him.<a name="FNanchor_266_266" id="FNanchor_266_266"></a><a href="#Footnote_266_266" class="fnanchor">[266]</a> The stern, denunciative harangues were despised. -At last Zechariah, the son of his benefactor Jehoiada, -rebuked king and people. He cried aloud from some -eminence in the court of the Temple, that "since they had -transgressed the commandments of Jehovah they could -not prosper: they had forsaken Him, and He would -forsake them." Infuriated by this prophecy of woe, -the guilty people, at the command of their guiltier king,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_159" id="Page_159">[Pg 159]</a></span> -stoned him to death.<a name="FNanchor_267_267" id="FNanchor_267_267"></a><a href="#Footnote_267_267" class="fnanchor">[267]</a> As he lay dying, he exclaimed, -"The Lord look upon it, and require it!"<a name="FNanchor_268_268" id="FNanchor_268_268"></a><a href="#Footnote_268_268" class="fnanchor">[268]</a></p> - -<p>The entire silence of the elder and better authority -might lead us to hope that there may be room for -doubt as to the accuracy of the much later tradition. -Yet there certainly was a persistent belief that Zechariah -had been thus martyred. A wild legend, related in the -Talmud,<a name="FNanchor_269_269" id="FNanchor_269_269"></a><a href="#Footnote_269_269" class="fnanchor">[269]</a> tells us that when Nebuzaradan conquered -Jerusalem and entered the Temple he saw blood -bubbling up from the floor of the court, and slaughtered -ninety-four myriads, so that the blood flowed till it -touched the blood of Zechariah, that it might be -fulfilled which is said (Hos. iv. 2), "Blood toucheth -blood." When he saw the blood of Zechariah, and -noticed that it was boiling and agitated, he asked, -"What is this?" and was told that it was the spilled -blood of the sacrifices. Finding this to be false, he -threatened to comb the flesh of the priests with iron -curry-combs if they did not tell the truth. Then they -confessed that it was the blood of the murdered -Zechariah. "Well," he said, "I will pacify him." -First he slaughtered the greater and lesser Sanhedrin: -but the blood did not rest. Then he sacrificed young<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_160" id="Page_160">[Pg 160]</a></span> -men and maidens: but the blood still bubbled. At -last he cried, "Zechariah, Zechariah, must I then slay -them all?" Then the blood was still, and Nebuzaradan, -thinking how much blood he had shed, fled, repented, -and became a Jewish proselyte!</p> - -<p>Perhaps the worst feature of the story against Joash -might have been susceptible of a less shocking colouring. -He had naturally all his life been under the influence -of priestly domination. The ascendency which Jehoiada -had acquired as priest-regent had been maintained till -long after the young king had arrived at full manhood. -At last, however, he had come into collision with the -priestly body. He was in the right; they were -transparently in the wrong. The Chronicler, and -even the older historian, soften the story against the -priests as much as they can; but in both their narratives -it is plain that Jehoiada and the whole hierarchy had -been more careful of their own interests than of those -of the Temple, of which they were the appointed -guardians. Even if they can be acquitted of potential -malfeasance, they had been guilty of reprehensible -carelessness. It is clear that in this matter they did -not command the confidence of the people; for so long -as they had the management of affairs the sources of -munificence were either dried up or only flowed in -scanty streams, whereas they were poured forth with -glad abundance when the administration of the funds -was placed mainly in the hands of laymen under the -king's chancellor. It is probable that when Jehoiada -was dead Joash thought it right to assert his royal -authority in greater independence of the priestly party; -and that party was headed by Zechariah, the son of -Jehoiada. The Chronicler says that he prophesied: -that, however, would not necessarily constitute him a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_161" id="Page_161">[Pg 161]</a></span> -prophet, any more than it constituted Caiaphas. If he -was a prophet, and was yet at the head of the priests, -he furnishes an all-but solitary instance of such a -position. The position of a prophet, occupied in the -great work of moral reformation, was so essentially -antithetic to that of priests, absorbed in ritual ceremonies, -that there is no body of men in Scripture of -whom, as a whole, we have a more pitiful record than -of the Jewish priests. From Aaron, who made the -golden calf, to Urijah, who sanctioned the idolatrous -altar of Ahaz, and so down to Annas and Caiaphas, -who crucified the Lord of glory, they rendered few -signal services to true religion. They opposed Uzziah -when he invaded their functions, but they acquiesced -in all the idolatries and abominations of Rehoboam, -Abijah, Ahaziah, Ahaz, and many other kings, without -a syllable of recorded protest. When a prophet did -spring from their ranks, they set their faces with one -consent, and were confederate against him. They -mocked and ridiculed Isaiah. When Jeremiah rose -among them, the priest Pashur smote him on the cheek, -and the whole body persecuted him to death, leaving -him to be protected only by the pity of eunuchs and -courtiers. Ezekiel was the priestliest of the prophets, -and yet he was forced to denounce the apostasies -which they permitted in the very Temple. The pages -of the prophets ring with denunciations of their priestly -contemporaries.<a name="FNanchor_270_270" id="FNanchor_270_270"></a><a href="#Footnote_270_270" class="fnanchor">[270]</a></p> - -<p>We do not know enough of Zechariah to say much -about his character; but priests in every age have -shown themselves the most unscrupulous and the most -implacable of enemies. Joash probably stood to him<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_162" id="Page_162">[Pg 162]</a></span> -in the same relation that Henry II. stood to Thomas - Becket. The priest's murder may have been due to -an outburst of passion on the part of the king's friends, -or of the king himself—gentle as his character seems -to have been—without being the act of black ingratitude -which late traditions represented it to be. The -legend about Zechariah's blood represents the priest's -spirit as so ruthlessly unforgiving as to awaken the -astonishment and even the rebukes of the Babylonian -idolater. Such a legend could hardly have arisen in the -case of a man who was other than a most formidable -opponent. The murder of Joash may have been, in its -turn, a final outcome of the revenge of the priestly party. -The details of the story must be left to inference and -conjecture, especially as they are not even mentioned in -the earlier and more impartial annalists.</p> - -<p>It is at least singular that while Joash, the king, is -blamed for continuing the worship at the <i>bamoth</i>, -Jehoiada, the high priest, is <i>not</i> blamed, though they -continued throughout his long and powerful regency. -Further, we have an instance of the priest-regent's -autocracy which can hardly be regarded as redounding -to his credit. It is preserved in an accidental allusion -on the page of Jeremiah. In Jer. xxix. 26 we read his -reproof and doom of the lying prophecy of the priest -Shemaiah the Nehelamite, because as a priest he had -sent a letter to the chief priest Zephaniah and all the -priests, urging them as the successors of Jehoiada to -follow the ruling of Jehoiada, which was to put Jeremiah -in a collar. For Jehoiada, he said, "had ordered the -priests, as officers [<i>pakidim</i>] in the house of Jehovah, to -put in the stocks every one that is mad and maketh -himself a prophet."<a name="FNanchor_271_271" id="FNanchor_271_271"></a><a href="#Footnote_271_271" class="fnanchor">[271]</a> If, then, the Jehoiada referred to is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_163" id="Page_163">[Pg 163]</a></span> -the priest-regent, as seems undoubtedly to be the case, -we see that he hated all interference of Jehovah's -prophets with his rule. That the prophets were -usually regarded by the world and by priests as -"mad," we see from the fact that the title is given -by Jehu's captains to Elisha's emissary;<a name="FNanchor_272_272" id="FNanchor_272_272"></a><a href="#Footnote_272_272" class="fnanchor">[272]</a> and that this -continued to be the case we see from the fact that the -priests and Pharisees of Jerusalem said of John the -Baptist that he had a devil, and of Christ that He was -a Samaritan, and that He, too, had a devil. If Joash -was in opposition to the priestly party, he was in the -same position as all God's greatest saints and reformers -have ever been from the days of Moses to the days -of John Wesley. The dominance of priestcraft is the -invariable and inevitable death of true, as apart from -functional, religion. Priests are always apt to concentrate -their attention upon their temples, altars, -religious practices and rites—in a word, upon the -externals of religion. If they gain a complete ascendency -over their fellow-believers, the faithful become -their absolute slaves, religion degenerates into formalism, -"and the life of the soul is choked by the -observance of the ceremonial law." It was a misfortune -for the Chosen People that, except among the prophets -and the wise men, the external worship was thought -much more of than the moral law. "To the ordinary -man," says Wellhausen, "it was not moral but liturgical -acts which seemed to be religious." This accounts -for the monotonous iteration of judgments on the -character of kings, based primarily, not upon their -essential character, but on their relation to the <i>bamoth</i> -and the calves.</p> - -<p>Although the historian of the Kings gives no hint of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_164" id="Page_164">[Pg 164]</a></span> -this dark story of Zechariah's murder, or of the apostasy -of Joash, and indeed narrates no other event of the -long reign of forty years, he tells us of the deplorable -close. Hazael's ambition had been fatal to Israel; and -now, in the cessation of Assyrian inroads upon Aram, -he extended his arms towards Judah. He went up -against Gath and took it, and cherished designs against -Jerusalem. Apparently he did not head the expedition -in person, and the historian implies that Joash bought -off the attack of his "general." But the Chronicler -makes things far worse. He says that the Syrian host -marched to Jerusalem, destroyed all the princes of the -people, plundered the city, and sent the spoil to Hazael, -who was at Damascus. Judah, he says, had assembled -a vast army to resist the small force of the Syrian raid; -but Joash was ignominiously defeated, and was driven -to pay blackmail to the invader. As to this defeat in -battle the historian is silent; but he mentions what the -Chronicler omits—namely, that the only way in which -Joash could raise the requisite bribe was by once more -stripping the Temple and the palace, and sending to -Damascus all the treasures which his three predecessors -had consecrated,—though we are surprised to learn that -after so many strippings and plunderings any of them -could still be left.</p> - -<p>The anguish and mortification of mind caused by -these disasters, and perhaps the wounds he had received -in the defeat of his army, threw Joash into "great -diseases." But he was not suffered to die of these.<a name="FNanchor_273_273" id="FNanchor_273_273"></a><a href="#Footnote_273_273" class="fnanchor">[273]</a> -His servants—perhaps, if that story be authentic, to -avenge the slain son of Jehoiada, but doubtless also in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_165" id="Page_165">[Pg 165]</a></span> -disgust at the national humiliation—rose in conspiracy -against him, and smote him at Beth-Millo,<a name="FNanchor_274_274" id="FNanchor_274_274"></a><a href="#Footnote_274_274" class="fnanchor">[274]</a> where he -was lying sick. The Septuagint, in 2 Chron. xxiv. 27, -adds the dark fact that <i>all his sons</i> joined in the conspiracy.<a name="FNanchor_275_275" id="FNanchor_275_275"></a><a href="#Footnote_275_275" class="fnanchor">[275]</a> -This cannot be true of Amaziah, who put the -murderer to death. Such, however, was the deplorable -end of the king who had stood by the Temple pillar in -his fair childhood, amid the shouts and trumpet-blasts -of a rejoicing people. At that time all things seemed -full of promise and of hope. Who could have anticipated -that the boy whose head had been touched with the -sacred oil and over-shadowed with the Testimony—the -young king who had made a covenant with Jehovah, -and had initiated the task of restoring the ruined -Temple to its pristine beauty—would end his reign in -earthquake and eclipse? If indeed he had been guilty -of the black ingratitude and murderous apostasy which -tradition laid to his charge, we see in his end the -Nemesis of his ill-doing; yet we cannot but pity one -who, after so long a reign, perished amid the spoliation -of his people, and was not even allowed to end his days -by the sore sickness into which he had fallen, but was -hurried into the next world by the assassin's knife.</p> - -<p>It is impossible not to hope that his deeds were less -black than the Chronicler painted. He had made the -priests feel his power and resentment, and their Levitic -recorder was not likely to take a lenient view of his -offences. He says that though Joash was buried in -the City of David, he was not buried in the sepulchres -of his fathers. The historian of the Kings, however, -expressly says that "they buried him with his fathers<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_166" id="Page_166">[Pg 166]</a></span> -in the City of David," and he was peaceably succeeded -by Amaziah his son.</p> - -<p>There is a curious, though it may be an accidental, -circumstance about the name of the two conspirators -who slew him. They are called "Jozacar, the son of -Shimeath, and Jehozabad, the son of Shomer, his -servants." The names mean "Jehovah remembers," -the son of "Hearer," and "Jehovah awards," the son of -"Watcher"; and this strangely recalls the last words -attributed in the Book of Chronicles to the martyred -Zechariah. "Jehovah look upon it, and require it!" -The Chronicler turns the names into "Zabad, the son -of Shimeath, an Ammonitess, and Jehozabad, the son of -Shimrith, a Moabitess." Does he record this to account -for their murderous deed by the blood of hated nations -which ran in their veins?</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_167" id="Page_167">[Pg 167]</a></span></p> - - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XV" id="CHAPTER_XV">CHAPTER XV</a></h2> - -<h3><i>AMAZIAH OF JUDAH</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 796-783 (?)</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xiv. 1-22</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"All they that take the sword shall perish with the sword."—<span class="smcap">Matt.</span> -xxvi. 52.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>The fate of Amaziah ("Jehovah is strong"), son of -Joash of Judah, resembles in some respects that -of his father. Both began to reign prosperously: the -happiness of both ended in disaster. Amaziah at his -accession was twenty-five years old. He was the son -of a lady of Jerusalem named Jehoaddin. He reigned -twenty-nine years, of which the later ones were passed -in misery, peril, and degradation, and, like the unhappy -Joash, and at about the same age, he fell the victim of -domestic conspiracy.</p> - -<p>The hereditary principle was too strongly established -to enable the murderers of Joash to set it aside, but -Amaziah was not at first strong enough to make any -head against them. In time he became established in -his kingdom, and then his earliest act was to bring the -head conspirators, Jozacar and Jehozabad, to justice. -It was noted as a most remarkable circumstance that -he did not put to death their children, and extirpate -their houses. In acting thus, if he were influenced by<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_168" id="Page_168">[Pg 168]</a></span> -a spirit of mercy, he showed himself before his time; -but such mercy was completely contrary to the universal -custom, and was also regarded as most impolitic. -Even the comparatively merciful Greeks had the -proverb, "Fool, who has murdered the sire, and left -his sons to avenge him!"<a name="FNanchor_276_276" id="FNanchor_276_276"></a><a href="#Footnote_276_276" class="fnanchor">[276]</a></p> - -<p>In epochs of the wild justice of revenge, when blood-feuds -are an established and approved institution, the -policy of letting vengeance only fall on the actual -offender was regarded as fatal. Perhaps Amaziah felt -it beyond his power to do more than bring the actual -murderers to justice, and it is possible that their -children may have been among the conspirators who, -in his hour of shame, intimately destroyed him.</p> - -<p>The historian, it is true, attributes his conduct to -magnanimity, or rather to his obedience to the law, -"The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, -nor the children for the fathers; but every man shall die -for his own sin." This is a reference to Deut. xxiv. 16, -and is probably the independent comment of the writer -who recorded the event two centuries later. In the -gradual growth of a milder civilisation, and the more -common dominance of legal justice, such a law may -have come into force, as expressive of that voice of -conscience which is to sincere nations the voice of God. -That the book of Deuteronomy, as a book, was not in -existence in its present form till four reigns later we -shall hereafter see strong reasons to believe. But even -if any part of that book was in existence, it is not easy -to understand how Amaziah would have been able to -decide that the law which forbade the punishment of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_169" id="Page_169">[Pg 169]</a></span> -the children with the offending parents was the law -which he was bound to follow, when Moses and Joshua -and other heroes of his race had acted on the olden -principle. The innocent families of Korah, Dathan, -and Abiram were represented as having been swallowed -up with the ambitious heads of their houses. -Joshua and all Israel had not only stoned Achan, but -with him all his unoffending house. What, too, was -the meaning of the law which established the five Cities -of Refuge as the best way to protect the accidental -homicide from the recognised and unrebuked actions -of the Goel—the avenger of blood? The vengeance -of a Goel was regarded, as it is in the East and South -to this day, not as an implacable fierceness, but as a -sacred duty, the neglect of which would cover him with -infamy. Judging of our documents by the impartial light -of honest criticism, it seems impossible to deny that -the law of Deuteronomy was the law of an advancing -civilisation, which became more mild as justice became -firmer and more available. If Deuteronomy represents -the legislation of Moses, we can only say that in this -respect Amaziah was the first person who paid the -slightest attention to it. Such exceptional obedience -may well excite the notice of the historian, in whose -pages we see that prophets like Ahijah, Elijah, and -Elisha had, again and again, in accordance with the -spirit of their times, contemplated the total excision, -not only of erring kings, but even of their little children -and their most distant kinsfolk.</p> - -<p>Further:—We are told that Amaziah "did that -which was right in the sight of Jehovah: he did -according to all things <i>as Joash his father did</i>." The -Chronicler also bestows his eulogy on Amaziah; but -having told such dark stories of the apostasy of Joash<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_170" id="Page_170">[Pg 170]</a></span> -to Asherah-worship and his murder of the prophets, -he could hardly add "as Joash his father did"; so he -omits those words. The reservation that Amaziah did -right, "yet not like David his father" (2 Kings xiv. 3), -"but not with a perfect heart" (2 Chron. xxv. 2), is -followed by the stock abatement about the <i>bamoth</i>, -and the sacrifices and incense burnt in them. This -was a crime in the eyes of writers in <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 540, but -certainly not in the eyes of any king before the -discovery of the "Book of the Law" in the reign of -Josiah, <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 621. We are compelled, therefore, by -simple truth, to ask, How came it that Amaziah should -be so scrupulous as to observe the Deuteronomic law -by not slaying the sons of his father's murderers, while -he does not seem to be aware, any more than the -best of his predecessors, that while he obeyed one -precept he was violating the essence and spirit of the -entire code in which the precept occurs? The one -main object, the constantly repeated law of Deuteronomy, -is the centralisation of all worship, and the rigid prohibition -of every local place of sacrifice. Strange that -Amaziah should have selected for attention a single -precept, while he is profoundly unconscious of, or indifferent -to, the fact that he is setting aside the regulation -with which the law, as Deuteronomy represents it, -begins and ends, and on which it incessantly insists!</p> - -<p>Joash had been something of a weakling, as though -the gloom of his early concealment in the Temple and -the shadow of priestly dominance had paralysed his -independence. Amaziah, on the other hand, born in -the purple, was vigorous and restless. When he was -secure upon the throne, and had done his duty to his -father's memory, he bent his efforts to recover Edom. -The Edomites had revolted in the days of his great-grandfather<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_171" id="Page_171">[Pg 171]</a></span> -Jehoram,<a name="FNanchor_277_277" id="FNanchor_277_277"></a><a href="#Footnote_277_277" class="fnanchor">[277]</a> and since then "did tear perpetually,"<a name="FNanchor_278_278" id="FNanchor_278_278"></a><a href="#Footnote_278_278" class="fnanchor">[278]</a> -harassing with incessant raids the miserable -fellahn of Southern Judah. They reaped the crops of -the settled inhabitants, cut down their fruit-trees, burnt -their farmsteads, and carried their children into cruel -and hopeless slavery. One verse tells us all that the -historian knew, or cared to relate, of Amaziah's campaign. -He only says that it was eminently successful. -Amaziah confronted the Edomites in the Valley of -Salt,<a name="FNanchor_279_279" id="FNanchor_279_279"></a><a href="#Footnote_279_279" class="fnanchor">[279]</a> on the border of Edom, to the south of the Dead -Sea, and inflicted upon them a signal defeat. He not -only slaughtered ten thousand of them, but, advancing -southwards, he stormed and captured Selah or Petra, -their rocky capital, two days' journey north of Ezion-Geber, -on the gulf of Akabah.<a name="FNanchor_280_280" id="FNanchor_280_280"></a><a href="#Footnote_280_280" class="fnanchor">[280]</a> Considering the natural -strength of Petra, amid its mountain-fastnesses, this -was a victory of which he might well be proud, and -he marked his prowess by changing the name of the -city to Joktheel, "subdued by God." The historian, -copying the ancient record before him, says that Selah -continued to be so called "to this day."<a name="FNanchor_281_281" id="FNanchor_281_281"></a><a href="#Footnote_281_281" class="fnanchor">[281]</a> This is a -curious instance of close transcription, for it is certain -that Selah can only have retained the name of Joktheel -for a very short period, and had lost it long before the -days of the Exile. Even in the reign of Ahaz (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> -735-715) the Edomites had so completely recovered<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_172" id="Page_172">[Pg 172]</a></span> -lost ground that they were able to make predatory -excursions into Judah, and to threaten Hebron, which -would have been obviously impossible if they were -not masters of their own chief capital.<a name="FNanchor_282_282" id="FNanchor_282_282"></a><a href="#Footnote_282_282" class="fnanchor">[282]</a> The district -which Amaziah seems to have conquered was mainly -west of the Arabah. He wished to restore Elath, and -perhaps to carry out the old commerce with the Red -Sea which Solomon began, and which had fired the -ambition of Jehoshaphat. The conquest of Selah -secured the road for his commercial caravans.</p> - -<p>So far the older and better authorities. The -Chronicler expands the story in his usual fashion, in -which historical and critical verity is so often compelled, -if not to suspect the disease of exaggeration and the -bias of Levitism, at least to feel uncertainty as to the -details. He says that Amaziah collected an army of -three hundred thousand men of Judah, trained them -to a high state of discipline, and armed them with spear -and shield. He hired in addition one hundred thousand -Israelitish mercenaries, mighty men of valour, at the -heavy cost of one hundred talents of silver. He was -rebuked by a prophet for employing Israelites, "because -the Lord was not with them," so that if he used their -aid he would certainly be defeated. Amaziah asked -what he was to do for the hundred talents, and the -prophet told him that Jehovah could give him much -more than this.<a name="FNanchor_283_283" id="FNanchor_283_283"></a><a href="#Footnote_283_283" class="fnanchor">[283]</a> So he dismissed his Ephraimites -who, returning home in great fury, "fell upon the cities -of Judah," from Samaria even unto Beth-horon, killed -three thousand of their inhabitants, and took much -spoil. Amaziah, however, defeated the Edomites without -their aid, and not only slew ten thousand, but took<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_173" id="Page_173">[Pg 173]</a></span> -captive ten thousand more, all of whom he dashed to -pieces by hurling them from the top of the rock of -Petra.<a name="FNanchor_284_284" id="FNanchor_284_284"></a><a href="#Footnote_284_284" class="fnanchor">[284]</a></p> - -<p>Then, by an apostasy much more astounding than -even that of his father Joash, he took home with him -the idols of Mount Seir, worshipped them, and burnt -incense before them. Jehovah sends a prophet to -rebuke him for his senseless infatuation in worshipping -the gods of the Edomites whom he had just so utterly -defeated; but Amaziah returns him the insolent answer, -"Who made thee of the king's council? Be silent, -or I will put thee to death." The prophet met his -ironical sneer with words of deeper meaning: "If I am -not on <i>your</i> council, I am on God's. Because thou hast -not hearkened to my counsel, I know that God has -counselled to destroy thee."</p> - -<p>The later writer thus accounts for the folly and -overthrow of this valorous and hitherto eminently -pious king. Certain it is, as we shall narrate in the -next chapter, that, in spite of warning, he had the -temerity to challenge to battle the warlike Joash ben-Jehoahaz -of Israel, grandson of Jehu. The kings met -at Beth-Shemesh, and Amaziah was utterly routed, -with consequences so shameful to himself and to Jerusalem -that he was never able to hold up his head again. -He could but eat away his own heart in despair, a -ruined man. After this he "lived" rather than reigned -fifteen years longer.<a name="FNanchor_285_285" id="FNanchor_285_285"></a><a href="#Footnote_285_285" class="fnanchor">[285]</a> The wall of Jerusalem, broken -down near the Damascus Gate, on the side towards<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_174" id="Page_174">[Pg 174]</a></span> -Israel, for a space of four hundred cubits, was a standing -witness of the king's infatuated folly. His people were -ashamed of him, and weary of him; and at last, seeing -that nothing more could be expected of one whose spirit -had evidently been broken from impetuosity into abjectness, -they formed a conspiracy against him. To save -his life he fled to the strong fort of Lachish, a royal -Canaanite city, in the hills to the south-west of Judah.<a name="FNanchor_286_286" id="FNanchor_286_286"></a><a href="#Footnote_286_286" class="fnanchor">[286]</a> -But they pursued him thither, and even Lachish would -not protect him. He was murdered. They threw the -corpse upon a chariot, conveyed it to Jerusalem, and -buried it in the sepulchres of his fathers. The people -quietly elevated to the throne his son Azariah, then -sixteen years old, who had been born the year before -his father's crowning disgrace. What became of the -conspirators we do not know. They were probably -too strong to be brought to justice, and we are not told -that Azariah even attempted to visit their crime upon -their heads.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_175" id="Page_175">[Pg 175]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XVI" id="CHAPTER_XVI">CHAPTER XVI</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE DYNASTY OF JEHU</i></h3> - -<table class="middle" summary="Dynasty of Jehu"> - <tbody> - <tr> - <td> </td> - <td class="center"><span class="smcap">b.c.</span></td> - <td class="center"> </td> - <td> </td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Jehoahaz</td> - <td>814-797</td> - <td class="center">2 Kings</td> - <td>xiii. 1-9</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Joash</td> - <td>797-781</td> - <td class="center">"</td> - <td>xiii. 10-21, xiv. 8-16</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Jeroboam II.</td> - <td>781-740</td> - <td class="center">"</td> - <td>xiv. 23-29</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Zechariah</td> - <td>740</td> - <td class="center">"</td> - <td>xv. 8-12</td> - </tr> - </tbody> -</table> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"Them that honour Me I will honour, and they that despise Me -shall be lightly esteemed."—1 <span class="smcap">Sam.</span> ii. 30.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>Israel had scarcely ever sunk to so low a nadir -of degradation as she did in the reign of the -son of Jehu. We have already mentioned that some -assign to his reign the ghastly story which we have -narrated in our sketch of the work of Elisha. It is -told in the sixth chapter of the Second Book of Kings, -and seems to belong to the reign of Jehoram ben-Ahab; -but it may have got displaced from this epoch of yet -deeper wretchedness. The accounts of Jehoahaz in -2 Kings xiii. are evidently fragmentary and abrupt.</p> - -<p>Jehoahaz reigned seventeen years.<a name="FNanchor_287_287" id="FNanchor_287_287"></a><a href="#Footnote_287_287" class="fnanchor">[287]</a> Naturally, he -did not disturb the calf-worship, which, like all his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_176" id="Page_176">[Pg 176]</a></span> -predecessors and successors, he regarded as a perfectly -innocent symbolic adoration of Jehovah, whose name -he bore and whose service he professed. Why should -he do so? It had been established now for more than -two centuries. His father, in spite of his passionate -and ruthless zeal for Jehovah, had never attempted to -disturb it. No prophet—not even Elijah nor Elisha, -the practical establishers of his dynasty—had said one -word to condemn it. It in no way rested on his conscience -as an offence; and the formal condemnation -of it by the historian only reflects the more enlightened -judgment of the Southern Kingdom and of a later age. -But according to the parenthesis which breaks the -thread of this king's story (2 Kings xiii. 5, 6), he was -guilty of a far more culpable defection from orthodox -worship; for in his reign, the Asherah—the tree or -pillar of the Tyrian nature-goddess—still remained in -Samaria, and therefore must have had its worshippers. -How it came there we cannot tell. Jezebel had set -it up (1 Kings xvi. 33), with the connivance of Ahab. -Jehu apparently had "put it away" with the great stl -of Baal (2 Kings iii. 2), but, for some reason or other, -he had not destroyed it. It now apparently occupied -some public place, a symbol of decadence, and provocative -of the wrath of Heaven.</p> - -<p>Jehoahaz sank very low. Hazael's savage sword, -not content with the devastation of Bashan and Gilead, -wasted the west of Israel also in all its borders. The -king became a mere vassal of his brutal neighbour -at Damascus. So little of the barest semblance of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_177" id="Page_177">[Pg 177]</a></span> -power was left him, that whereas, in the reign of David, -Israel could muster an army of eight hundred thousand, -and in the reign of Joash, the son and successor -of Jehoahaz, Amaziah could hire from Israel one -hundred thousand mighty men of valour as mercenaries, -Jehoahaz was only allowed to maintain an army of -ten chariots, fifty horsemen, and ten thousand infantry! -In the picturesque phrase of the historian, "the King -of Syria had threshed down Israel to the dust," in spite -of all that Jehoahaz did, or tried to do, and "all his -might." How completely helpless the Israelites were -is shown by the fact that their armies could offer no -opposition to the free passage of the Syrian troops -through their land. Hazael did not regard them as -threatening his rear; for, in the reign of Jehoahaz, -he marched southwards, took the Philistine city of -Gath, and threatened Jerusalem. Joash of Judah could -only buy them off with the bribe of all his treasures, -and according to the Chronicler they "destroyed all the -princes of the people," and took great spoil to Damascus.<a name="FNanchor_288_288" id="FNanchor_288_288"></a><a href="#Footnote_288_288" class="fnanchor">[288]</a></p> - -<p>Where was Elisha? After the anointing of Jehu -he vanishes from the scene. Unless the narrative of -the siege of Samaria has been displaced, we do not so -much as once hear of him for nearly half a century.</p> - -<p>The fearful depth of humiliation to which the king -was reduced drove him to repentance. Wearied to -death of the Syrian oppression of which he was the -daily witness, and of the utter misery caused by -prowling bands of Ammonites and Moabites—jackals -who waited on the Syrian lion—Jehoahaz "besought -the Lord,<a name="FNanchor_289_289" id="FNanchor_289_289"></a><a href="#Footnote_289_289" class="fnanchor">[289]</a> and the Lord hearkened unto him, and gave<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_178" id="Page_178">[Pg 178]</a></span> -Israel a saviour, so that they went out from under the -hand of the Syrians: and the children of Israel dwelt -in their tents, as beforetime." If this indeed refers to -events which come out of place in the memoirs of -Elisha; and if Jehoahaz ben-Jehu, not Jehoram ben-Ahab, -was the king in whose reign the siege of Samaria -was so marvellously raised, then Elisha may possibly -be the temporary deliverer who is here alluded to.<a name="FNanchor_290_290" id="FNanchor_290_290"></a><a href="#Footnote_290_290" class="fnanchor">[290]</a> -On this supposition we may see a sign of the repentance -of Jehoahaz in the shirt of sackcloth which he -wore under his robes, as it became visible to his -starving people when he rent his clothes on hearing the -cannibal instincts which had driven mothers to devour -their own children. But the respite must have been -brief, since Hazael (ver. 22) oppressed Israel all the -days of Jehoahaz. If this rearrangement of events -be untenable, we must suppose that the repentance of -Jehoahaz was only so far accepted, and his prayer so -far heard, that the deliverance, which did not come in -his own days, came in those of his son and of his -grandson.</p> - -<p>Of him and of his wretched reign we hear no more; -but a very different epoch dawned with the accession -of his son Joash, named after the contemporary King -of Judah, Joash ben-Ahaziah.</p> - -<p>In the Books of Kings and Chronicles Joash of -Israel is condemned with the usual refrains about the -sins of Jeroboam. No other sin is laid to his charge; -and breaking the monotony of reprobation which tells -us of every king of Israel without exception that "he -did that which was evil in the sight of the Lord," -Josephus boldly ventures to call him "a good man, -and the antithesis to his father."</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_179" id="Page_179">[Pg 179]</a></span></p> - -<p>He reigned sixteen years. At the beginning of his -reign he found his country the despised prey, not only -of Syria, but of the paltry neighbouring bandit-sheykhs -who infested the east of the Jordan; he left it comparatively -strong, prosperous, and independent.</p> - -<p>In his reign we hear again of Elisha, now a very -old man of past eighty years. Nearly half a century -had elapsed since the grandfather of Joash had -destroyed the house of Ahab at the prophet's command. -News came to the king that Elisha was sick of a -mortal sickness, and he naturally went to visit the -death-bed of one who had called his dynasty to the -throne, and had in earlier years played so memorable -a part in the history of his country. He found the old -man dying, and he wept over him, crying, "My father, -my father! the chariot of Israel, and the horsemen -thereof."<a name="FNanchor_291_291" id="FNanchor_291_291"></a><a href="#Footnote_291_291" class="fnanchor">[291]</a> The address strikes us with some surprise. -Elisha had indeed delivered Samaria more than once -when the city had been reduced to direst extremity; -but in spite of his prayers and of his presence, the sins -of Israel and her kings had rendered this chariot of -Israel of very small avail. The names of Ahab, Jehu, -Jehoahaz, call up memories of a series of miseries and -humiliations which had reduced Israel to the very verge -of extinction. For sixty-three years Elisha had been -the prophet of Israel; and though his public interpositions -had been signal on several occasions, they had -not been availing to prevent Ahab from becoming the -vassal of Assyria, nor Israel from becoming the appanage -of the dominion of that Hazael whom Elisha -himself had anointed King of Syria, and who had -become of all the enemies of his country the most -persistent and the most implacable.</p> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_180" id="Page_180">[Pg 180]</a></span></p> -<p>The narrative which follows is very singular. We -must give it as it occurs, with but little apprehension -of its exact significance.</p> - -<p>Elisha, though Joash "did that which was evil in -the sight of the Lord," seems to have regarded him -with affection. He bade the youth take his bow,<a name="FNanchor_292_292" id="FNanchor_292_292"></a><a href="#Footnote_292_292" class="fnanchor">[292]</a> and -laid his feeble, trembling hands on the strong hands -of the king. Then he ordered an attendant to fling -open the lattice, and told the king to shoot eastward -towards Gilead, the region whence the bands of Syria -made their way over the Jordan. The king shot, and -the fire came back into the old prophet's eye as he -heard the arrow whistle eastward. He cried, "The -arrow of Jehovah's deliverance, even the arrow of -victory over Syria: for thou shalt smite the Syrians -in Aphek, till thou have consumed them."<a name="FNanchor_293_293" id="FNanchor_293_293"></a><a href="#Footnote_293_293" class="fnanchor">[293]</a> Then he -bade the young king to take the sheaf of arrows, and -smite towards the ground, as if he was striking down -an enemy. Not understanding the significance of the -act, the king made the sign of thrice striking the arrows -downwards, and then naturally stopped.<a name="FNanchor_294_294" id="FNanchor_294_294"></a><a href="#Footnote_294_294" class="fnanchor">[294]</a> But Elisha -was angry—or at any rate grieved.<a name="FNanchor_295_295" id="FNanchor_295_295"></a><a href="#Footnote_295_295" class="fnanchor">[295]</a> "You should -have smitten five or six times," he said, "and then you -would have smitten Syria to destruction. Now you -shall only smite Syria thrice." The king's fault seems -to have been lack of energy and faith.</p> - -<p>There are in this story some peculiar elements which -it is impossible to explain, but it has one beautiful<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_181" id="Page_181">[Pg 181]</a></span> -and striking feature. It tells us of the death-bed of -a prophet. Most of God's greatest prophets have -perished amid the hatred of priests and worldlings. -The progress of the truth they taught has been "from -scaffold to scaffold, and from stake to stake."</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Careless seems the Great Avenger. History's pages but record<br /></span> -<span class="i1">One death-grapple in the darkness 'twixt old systems and the Word—<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Truth for ever on the scaffold, wrong for ever on the throne;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Yet that scaffold sways the Future, and behind the dim unknown<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Standeth God within the shadow, keeping watch above His own!"<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>Now and then, however, as an exception, a great -prophetic teacher or reformer escapes the hatred of -the priests and of the world, and dies in peace. -Savonarola is burnt, Huss is burnt, but Wiclif dies -in his bed at Lutterworth, and Luther died in peace -at Eisleben. Elijah passed away in storm, and was -seen no more. A king comes to weep by the death-bed -of the aged Elisha. "For us," it has been said, "the -scene at his bedside contains a lesson of comfort and -even encouragement. Let us try to realise it. A man -with no material power is dying in the capital of Israel. -He is not rich: he holds no office which gives him any -immediate control over the actions of men; he has but -one weapon—the power of his word. Yet Israel's king -stands weeping at his bedside—weeping because this -inspired messenger of Jehovah is to be taken from -him. In him both king and people will lose a mighty -support, for this man is a greater strength to Israel -than chariots and horsemen are. Joash does well to -mourn for him, for he has had courage to wake the -nation's conscience; the might of his personality has -sufficed to turn them in the true direction, and rouse -their moral and religious life. Such men as Elisha<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_182" id="Page_182">[Pg 182]</a></span> -everywhere and always give a strength to their people -above the strength of armies, for the true blessings of a -nation are reared on the foundations of its moral force."</p> - -<p>The annals are here interrupted to introduce a -posthumous miracle—unlike any other in the whole -Bible—wrought by the bones of Elisha. He died, and -they buried him, "giving him," as Josephus says, "a -magnificent burial." As usual, the spring brought with -it the marauding bands of Moabites. Some Israelites -who were burying a man caught sight of them, and, -anxious to escape, thrust the man into the sepulchre -of Elisha, which happened to be nearest at hand. But -when he was placed in the rocky tomb, and touched -the bones of Elisha, he revived, and stood up on his -feet. Doubtless the story rests on some real circumstance. -There is, however, something singular in the -turn of the original, which says (literally) that the man -<i>went and touched</i> the bones of Elisha;<a name="FNanchor_296_296" id="FNanchor_296_296"></a><a href="#Footnote_296_296" class="fnanchor">[296]</a> and there is -proof that the story was told in varying forms, for -Josephus says that it was the Moabite plunderers who -had killed the man, and that he was thrown by them -into Elisha's tomb.<a name="FNanchor_297_297" id="FNanchor_297_297"></a><a href="#Footnote_297_297" class="fnanchor">[297]</a> It is easy to invent moral and -spiritual lessons out of this incident, but not so easy -to see what lesson is intended by it. Certainly there -is not throughout Scripture any other passage which -even <i>seems</i> to sanction any suspicions of magic potency -in the relics of the dead.<a name="FNanchor_298_298" id="FNanchor_298_298"></a><a href="#Footnote_298_298" class="fnanchor">[298]</a></p> - -<p>But Elisha's symbolic prophecy of deliverance from -Syria was amply fulfilled. About this time Hazael had -died, and had left his power in the feebler hands of his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_183" id="Page_183">[Pg 183]</a></span> -son Benhadad III. Jehoahaz had not been able to -make any way against him (2 Kings xiii. 3), but Joash -his son thrice met and thrice defeated him at Aphek. -As a consequence of these victories, he won back all -the cities which Hazael had taken from his father on -the west of Jordan. The east of Jordan was never -recovered. It fell under the shadow of Assyria, and -was practically lost for ever to the tribes of Israel.</p> - -<p>Whether Assyria lent her help to Joash under certain -conditions we do not know. Certain it is that from -this time the terror of Syria vanishes. The Assyrian -king Rammnirri III. about this time subjugated all -Syria and its king, whom the tablets call Mari, perhaps -the same as Benhadad III. In the next reign Damascus -itself fell into the power of Jeroboam II., the son of -Joash.</p> - -<p>One more event, to which we have already alluded, -is narrated in the reign of this prosperous and valiant -king.</p> - -<p>Amity had reigned for a century between Judah and -Israel, the result of the politic-impolitic alliance which -Jehoshaphat had sanctioned between his son Jehoram -and the daughter of Jezebel. It was obviously most -desirable that the two small kingdoms should be united -as closely as possible by an offensive and defensive -alliance. But the bond between them was broken by -the overweening vanity of Amaziah ben-Joash of Judah. -His victory over the Edomites, and his conquest of -Petra, had puffed him up with the mistaken notion -that he was a very great man and an invincible warrior. -He had the wicked infatuation to kindle an unprovoked -war against the Northern Tribes. It was the most -wanton of the many instances in which, if Ephraim -did not envy Judah, at least Judah vexed Ephraim,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_184" id="Page_184">[Pg 184]</a></span> -Amaziah challenged Joash to come out to battle, that -they might look one another in the face. He had not -recognised the difference between fighting with and -without the sanction of the God of battles.</p> - -<p>Joash had on his hands enough of necessary and -internecine war to make him more than indifferent to -that bloody game. Moreover, as the superior of Amaziah -in every way, he saw through his inflated emptiness. -He knew that it was the worst possible policy for -Judah and Israel to weaken each other in fratricidal -war, while Syria threatened their northern and eastern -frontiers, and while the tread of the mighty march -of Assyria was echoing ominously in the ears of the -nations from afar. Better and kinder feelings may -have mingled with these wise convictions. He had -no wish to destroy the poor fool who so vaingloriously -provoked his superior might. His answer was one of -the most crushingly contemptuous pieces of irony which -history records, and yet it was eminently kindly and -good-humoured. It was meant to save the King of -Judah from advancing any further on the path of -certain ruin.</p> - -<p>"The thistle that was in Lebanon" (such was the -apologue which he addressed to his would-be rival) -"sent to the cedar that was in Lebanon, saying: Give -thy daughter to my son to wife.<a name="FNanchor_299_299" id="FNanchor_299_299"></a><a href="#Footnote_299_299" class="fnanchor">[299]</a> The cedar took no -sort of notice of the thistle's ludicrous presumption, but -a wild beast that was in Lebanon passed by, and trod -down the thistle."</p> - -<p>It was the answer of a giant to a dwarf;<a name="FNanchor_300_300" id="FNanchor_300_300"></a><a href="#Footnote_300_300" class="fnanchor">[300]</a> and to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_185" id="Page_185">[Pg 185]</a></span> -make it quite clear to the humblest comprehension, -Joash good-naturedly added: "You are puffed up with -your victory over Edom: glory in this, and stay at -home. Why by your vain meddling should you ruin -yourself and Judah with you? Keep quiet: I have -something else to do than to attend to you."</p> - -<p>Happy had it been for Amaziah if he had taken -warning! But vanity is a bad counsellor, and folly -and self-deception—ill-matched pair—were whirling him -to his doom. Seeing that he was bent on his own -perdition, Joash took the initiative and marched to -Beth-Shemesh, in the territory of Judah.<a name="FNanchor_301_301" id="FNanchor_301_301"></a><a href="#Footnote_301_301" class="fnanchor">[301]</a> There the -kings met, and there Amaziah was hopelessly defeated. -His troops fled to their scattered homes, and he fell -into the hands of his conqueror. Joash did not care -to take any sanguinary revenge; but much as he -despised his enemy, he thought it necessary to teach -him and Judah the permanent lesson of not again -meddling to their own hurt. He took the captive king -with him to Jerusalem, which opened its gates without -a blow.<a name="FNanchor_302_302" id="FNanchor_302_302"></a><a href="#Footnote_302_302" class="fnanchor">[302]</a> We do not know whether, like a Roman -conqueror, he entered it through the breach of four -hundred cubits which he ordered them to make in the -walls,<a name="FNanchor_303_303" id="FNanchor_303_303"></a><a href="#Footnote_303_303" class="fnanchor">[303]</a> but otherwise he contented himself with spoil -which would swell his treasure, and amply compensate -for the expenses of the expedition which had been<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_186" id="Page_186">[Pg 186]</a></span> -forced upon him. He ransacked Jerusalem for silver -and gold; he made Obed-Edom, the treasurer, give up -to him all the sacred vessels of the Temple, and all -that was worth taking from the palace. He also took -hostages—probably from among the number of the -king's sons—to secure immunity from further intrusions. -It is the first time in Scripture that hostages are -mentioned. It is to his credit that he shed no blood, -and was even content to leave his defeated challenger -with the disgraced phantom of his kingly power, till, -fifteen years later, he followed his father to the grave -through the red path of murder at the hand of his own -subjects.<a name="FNanchor_304_304" id="FNanchor_304_304"></a><a href="#Footnote_304_304" class="fnanchor">[304]</a></p> - -<p>After this we hear no further records of this vigorous -and able king, in whom the characteristics of his -grandfather Jehu are reflected in softer outline. He -left his son Jeroboam II. to continue his career of -prosperity, and to advance Israel to a pitch of greatness -which she had never yet attained, in which she rivalled -the grandeur of the united kingdom in the earlier days -of Solomon's dominion.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_187" id="Page_187">[Pg 187]</a></span></p> - - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XVII" id="CHAPTER_XVII">CHAPTER XVII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE DYNASTY OF JEHU (continued)—JEROBOAM II</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 781-740</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xiv. 23-29</h4> - - -<p>If we had only the history of the kings to depend -upon, we should scarcely form an adequate conception -either of the greatness of Jeroboam II. or of -the condition of society which prevailed in Israel -during his long and most prosperous reign of forty-one -years (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 781-740). In the Books of Chronicles -he is merely mentioned accidentally in a genealogy. -The Second Book of Kings only devotes one verse to -him (xiv. 25) beyond the stock formul of connection -so often repeated. That verse, however, gives us at -least a glimpse of his great importance, for it tells us -that "he restored the coast of Israel from the entering -of Hamath unto the sea of the plain." Those two -lines sufficiently prove to us that he was by far the -greatest and most powerful of all the kings of Israel, -as he was also the longest-lived and had the longest -reign. His victories flung a broad gleam of sunset -over the afflicted kingdom, and, for a time, they might -have beguiled the Israelites into lofty hopes for the -future; but with the death of Jeroboam the light -instantly faded away, and there was no after-glow.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_188" id="Page_188">[Pg 188]</a></span></p> - -<p>And this sudden brightness, if it deceived others, -did not deceive the prophets of the Lord. It -happened in accordance with the promise of Jehovah -given by Jonah, the son of Amittai, of Gath-Hepher;<a name="FNanchor_305_305" id="FNanchor_305_305"></a><a href="#Footnote_305_305" class="fnanchor">[305]</a> -but Amos and Hosea saw that the glory of the reign -was hollow and delusive, and that the outward prosperity -did but "skin and film the ulcerous place" -below.</p> - -<p>In truth, the possibility of this sudden outburst of -success was due to the very enemy who, within a few -years, was to grind Israel to powder. God pitied the -deplorable overthrow of His chosen people: He saw -that there was neither slave nor freeman—"neither -any shut up, nor any left at large, nor any helper for -Israel"; and in Jeroboam He gave them the saviour -who had been granted to the penitence of Jehoahaz.<a name="FNanchor_306_306" id="FNanchor_306_306"></a><a href="#Footnote_306_306" class="fnanchor">[306]</a> -It was, so to speak, a last pledge to them of the love -and mercy of Jehovah, which gave them a respite, -and would fain have saved them altogether, if they -had turned with their whole heart to Him. And, -personally, Jeroboam II. seems to have been one of -the better kings. Not a single crime is laid to his -charge; for under the circumstances of its deep-rooted -continuance through the reigns of all his predecessors, -it cannot be deemed a heinous crime that he did not -put down the symbolic cult of Jehovah by the cherubic -emblems at Dan and Bethel. The fact that he had -been named after the founder of the kingdom of Israel<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_189" id="Page_189">[Pg 189]</a></span> -shows that the kingdom was proud of the valiant and -Heaven-commissioned rebel who had thrown off the -yoke of the house of Solomon. The house of Jehu -admired his policy and his institutions. The son of -Nebat did not by any means appear in the eyes of -his people as only worthy of the monotonous epitaph, -"who made Israel to sin." It is true that now the -voice of prophecy in Israel itself began to denounce the -concomitants of the "calf-worship"; but the voices of -the Jewish herdsman of Tekoa and of the Israelite -Hosea probably raised but faint murmurs in the ears -of the warrior-king, with whom they do not seem to -have come into personal contact. In no case would -he rank them as equal in importance with the fiery -Elijah or the king-making Elisha, who had been for -four generations the counsellor of his race. Neither -of those great prophets had insisted on the Deuteronomic -law of a centralised worship, nor had they -denounced the revered local sanctuaries with which -Israel had been so long familiar. Jonah, indeed—who, -if legend be correct, had been the boy of Zarephath, -and the personal attendant of Elijah—had predicted -the king's unbroken success, and had neither made it -conditional on a religious revolution, nor, so far as we -know, had in any way censured the existing institutions.</p> - -<p>What rendered Jeroboam's glory possible was the -immediate paralysis and imminent ruin of the power -of Syria. The Israelitish king was probably on good -terms with Assyria, and, during this epoch, three -Assyrian monarchs had struck blow after blow against -the house of Hazael. Damascus and its dependencies -had received shattering defeats at the hands of -Rammnirri III., Shalmaneser III. (782-772), and -Assurdan III. (772-754). Rammnirri had made<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_190" id="Page_190">[Pg 190]</a></span> -expeditions against Damascus (773) and Hazael (772), -and Assurdan had invaded the Syrian domains in 767, -755, and 754. Syria had more than enough to do to -hold her own in a struggle for life and death against -her atrocious neighbour. With Uzziah in Judah, -Jeroboam II. seems to have been on the friendliest -terms; and probably Uzziah acted as a half-independent -vassal, united with him by common interests. The -day for Assyria to threaten Israel had not yet come. -Syria lay in the path; and Assurdan III. had been -succeeded by Assurnirari, who gave the world the -unusual spectacle of a peaceful Assyrian king.</p> - -<p>Jeroboam II., therefore, was free to enlarge his -domains; and unless there be a little patriotic exaggeration -in the extent and reality of his prowess, he -exercised at least a nominal suzerainty over a realm -nearly as extensive as that of David. He first advanced -against Damascus, and so far "recovered" it as to -make it acknowledge his rule.<a name="FNanchor_307_307" id="FNanchor_307_307"></a><a href="#Footnote_307_307" class="fnanchor">[307]</a> His father Joash had -won back all the Israelite cities which Benhadad III. -had taken from Jehoahaz; and Jeroboam, if he did not -absolutely reconquer the district east of Jordan, yet -kept it in check and repressed the predatory incursions -of the Emrs of Moab and Ammon.<a name="FNanchor_308_308" id="FNanchor_308_308"></a><a href="#Footnote_308_308" class="fnanchor">[308]</a> He thus<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_191" id="Page_191">[Pg 191]</a></span> -extended the border of Israel to the sea of the Arabah -and "the brook of willows" which divides Edom from -Moab.<a name="FNanchor_309_309" id="FNanchor_309_309"></a><a href="#Footnote_309_309" class="fnanchor">[309]</a> But this was not all. He pushed his conquests -two hundred miles northwards of Samaria, and became -lord of Hamath the Great. Ascending the gorge of -the Litny between the chains of Libanus and Antilibanus, -which formed the northern limit of Israel, -and following the river to its source near Baalbek, -he then descended the Valley of the Orontes, which -constitutes the "pass" or "entering in" of Hamath. -Hamath was a town of the Hittites, the most powerful -race of ancient Canaan. They were not of Semitic -origin, but spoke a separate language. They were the -last great branch of the once famous and dominant -Khetas, whose former importance has only recently been -revealed by their deciphered inscriptions. A century -and a half earlier the Hamathites had thrown off the -yoke of Solomon, and they governed nearly a hundred -dependent cities. In alliance with the Phœnicians and -Syrians, they had been valuable members of a league, -which, though defeated, had long formed a barrier -against the southward movement of the Assyrians. -How striking was the conquest of this city by Jeroboam -is shown by the title of "Hamath the Great," bestowed -upon it by the contemporary prophets,<a name="FNanchor_310_310" id="FNanchor_310_310"></a><a href="#Footnote_310_310" class="fnanchor">[310]</a> with whom -literary prophecy begins.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_192" id="Page_192">[Pg 192]</a></span></p> - -<p>The result of these conquests was unwonted peace. -Agriculture once more became possible, when the -farmers of Israel were secure that their crops would -not be reaped by plundering Bedoun. Intercourse -with neighbouring nations was revived, as in the -golden days of Solomon, though it was regarded with -suspicion.<a name="FNanchor_311_311" id="FNanchor_311_311"></a><a href="#Footnote_311_311" class="fnanchor">[311]</a> Civilisation softened something of the old -brutality. Prophecy assumed a different type, and -literature began to dawn.</p> - -<p>But to this state of things there was, as we learn -from the contemporary prophets Amos and Hosea, a -darker side. Of Jonah we know nothing more; for it -is impossible to see in the Book of Jonah much more -than a beautiful and edifying story, which may or -may not rest on some surviving legends. It differs -from every other prophetic book by beginning with the -word "And," and its late origin and legendary character -cannot any longer be reasonably disputed.<a name="FNanchor_312_312" id="FNanchor_312_312"></a><a href="#Footnote_312_312" class="fnanchor">[312]</a> We may -hope, therefore, that the Northern prophet, whose -home was not far from Nazareth, was not quite the -morose and ruthless grumbler so strikingly portrayed -in the book which bears his name. Of any historical -intervention of his in the affairs of Jeroboam we know -nothing further than the recorded promise of the king's -prosperity.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_193" id="Page_193">[Pg 193]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XVIII" id="CHAPTER_XVIII">CHAPTER XVIII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>AMOS, HOSEA, AND THE KINGDOM OF ISRAEL</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xiv. 23-29; xv. 8-12</h4> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"In them is plainest taught and easiest learnt</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">What makes a nation happy and keeps it so,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">What ruins kingdoms and lays cities flat."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 20em;"><span class="smcap">Milton</span>, <i>Paradise Regained</i>.</span><br /> -</p> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"We see dimly in the Present what is small and what is great,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">Slow of faith how weak an arm may turn the iron helm of Fate:</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">But the soul is still oracular: amid the market's din</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">List the ominous stern whisper from the Delphic cave within,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">'They enslave their children's children who make compromise with sin.'"</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 33em;"><span class="smcap">Lowell.</span></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>Amos and Hosea are the two earliest prophets -whose "burdens" have come down to us. From -them we gain a near insight into the internal condition -of Israel in this day of her prosperity.</p> - -<p>We see, first, that the prosperity was not unbroken. -Though peace reigned, the people were not left to lapse -unwarned into sloth and godlessness. The land had -suffered from the horrible scourge of locusts, until every -<i>carmel</i>—every garden of God on hill and plain—withered -before them.<a name="FNanchor_313_313" id="FNanchor_313_313"></a><a href="#Footnote_313_313" class="fnanchor">[313]</a> There had been widespread -conflagrations;<a name="FNanchor_314_314" id="FNanchor_314_314"></a><a href="#Footnote_314_314" class="fnanchor">[314]</a> there had been a visitation of pestilence; -and, finally, there had been an earthquake so<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_194" id="Page_194">[Pg 194]</a></span> -violent that it constituted an epoch from which dates -were reckoned.<a name="FNanchor_315_315" id="FNanchor_315_315"></a><a href="#Footnote_315_315" class="fnanchor">[315]</a> There were also two eclipses of the sun, -which darkened with fear the minds of the superstitious.<a name="FNanchor_316_316" id="FNanchor_316_316"></a><a href="#Footnote_316_316" class="fnanchor">[316]</a></p> - -<p>Nor was this the worst. Civilisation and commerce -had brought luxury in their train, and all the bonds of -morality had been relaxed. The country began to be -comparatively depleted, and the innocent regularity of -agricultural pursuits palled upon the young, who were -seduced by the glittering excitement of the growing -towns. All zeal for religion was looked on as archaic, -and the splendour of formal services was regarded as -a sufficient recognition of such gods as there were. As -a natural consequence, the nobles and the wealthy -classes were more and more infected with a gross -materialism, which displayed itself in ostentatious furniture, -and sumptuous palaces of precious marbles inlaid -with ivory. The desire for such vanities increased -the thirst for gold, and avarice replenished its exhausted -coffers by grinding the faces of the poor, by defrauding -the hireling of his wages, by selling the righteous for -silver, the needy for handfuls of barley, and the poor -for a pair of shoes. The degrading vice of intoxication -acquired fresh vogue, and the gorgeous gluttonies of -the rich were further disgraced by the shameful spectacle<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_195" id="Page_195">[Pg 195]</a></span> -of drunkards, who lolled for hours over the revelries -which were inflamed by voluptuous music. Worst of -all, the purity of family life was invaded and broken -down. Throwing aside the old veiled seclusion of -women in Oriental life, the ladies of Israel showed -themselves in the streets in all "the bravery of their -tinkling ornaments of gold," and sank into the adulterous -courses stimulated by their pampered effrontery.</p> - -<p>Such is the picture which we draw from the burning -denunciations of the peasant-prophet of Tekoa. He -was no prophet nor prophet's son, but a humble -gatherer of sycomore-fruit, a toil which only fell to -the humblest of the people.<a name="FNanchor_317_317" id="FNanchor_317_317"></a><a href="#Footnote_317_317" class="fnanchor">[317]</a> Who is not afraid, he -asks, when a lion roars? and how can a prophet be -silent when the Lord God has spoken? Indignation -had transformed and dilated him from a labourer into -a seer, and had summoned him from the pastoral -shades of his native village—whether in Judah or in -Israel is uncertain—to denounce the more flagrant -iniquities of the Northern capital.<a name="FNanchor_318_318" id="FNanchor_318_318"></a><a href="#Footnote_318_318" class="fnanchor">[318]</a> First he proclaims<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_196" id="Page_196">[Pg 196]</a></span> -the vengeance of Jehovah upon the transgressions of -the Philistines, of Tyre, of Edom, of Ammon, of Moab, -and even of Judah; and then he turns with a crash -upon apostatising Israel.<a name="FNanchor_319_319" id="FNanchor_319_319"></a><a href="#Footnote_319_319" class="fnanchor">[319]</a> He speaks with unsparing -plainness of their pitiless greed, their shameless -debauchery, their exacting usury, their attempts to -pervert even the abstinent Nazarites into intemperance, -and to silence the prophets by opposition and obloquy. -Jehovah was crushed under their violence.<a name="FNanchor_320_320" id="FNanchor_320_320"></a><a href="#Footnote_320_320" class="fnanchor">[320]</a> And did -they think to go unscathed after such black ingratitude? -Nay! their mightiest should flee away naked in the -day of defeat. Robbery was in their houses of ivory, -and the few of them who should escape the spoiler -should only be as when a shepherd tears out of the -mouth of a lion two legs and a piece of an ear?<a name="FNanchor_321_321" id="FNanchor_321_321"></a><a href="#Footnote_321_321" class="fnanchor">[321]</a> -As for Bethel, their shrine—which he calls Bethaven, -"House of Vanity," not Bethel, "House of God"—the -horns of its altars should be cut off. Should oppression -and licentiousness flourish? Jehovah would take -them with hooks, and their children with fish-hooks, -and their sacrifices at Bethel and Gilgal should be -utterly unavailing. Drought, and blasting, and mildew, -and wasting plague, and earth-convulsions like those -which had swallowed Sodom and Gomorrha, from -which they should only be plucked as a "firebrand out -of the burning," should warn them that they must -prepare to meet their God.<a name="FNanchor_322_322" id="FNanchor_322_322"></a><a href="#Footnote_322_322" class="fnanchor">[322]</a> It was lamentable; but -lamentation was vain, unless they would return to -Jehovah, Lord of hosts,<a name="FNanchor_323_323" id="FNanchor_323_323"></a><a href="#Footnote_323_323" class="fnanchor">[323]</a> and abandon the false worship<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_197" id="Page_197">[Pg 197]</a></span> -of Bethel, Beersheba, and Gilgal, and listen to the -voice of the righteous, whom they now abhorred for -his rebukes. They talked hypocritically about "the -day of the Lord," but to them it should be blackness. -They relied on feast days, and services, and sacrifices; -but since they would not give the sacrifice of judgment -and righteousness, for which alone God cared, they -should be carried into captivity beyond Damascus: -yes! even to that terrible Assyria with whose king -they now were on friendly terms. They lay at ease -on their carved couches at their delicate feasts, draining -the wine-bowls, and glistering with fragrant oils, -heedless of the impending doom which would smite -the great house with breaches and the little house with -clefts, and which should bring upon them an avenger -who should afflict them from their conquered Hamath -southwards even to the wady of the wilderness.<a name="FNanchor_324_324" id="FNanchor_324_324"></a><a href="#Footnote_324_324" class="fnanchor">[324]</a> -The threatened judgments of locusts and fire had been -mitigated at the prophet's prayer, but nothing could -avert the plumb-line of destruction which Jehovah held -over them, and He would rise against the House of -Jeroboam with His sword.<a name="FNanchor_325_325" id="FNanchor_325_325"></a><a href="#Footnote_325_325" class="fnanchor">[325]</a> We infer from all that -Amos and Hosea say that the calf-worship at Bethel -(for Dan is not mentioned in this connexion<a name="FNanchor_326_326" id="FNanchor_326_326"></a><a href="#Footnote_326_326" class="fnanchor">[326]</a>) had<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_198" id="Page_198">[Pg 198]</a></span> -degenerated into an idolatry far more abject than it -originally was. The familiarity of such multitudes of -the people with Baal-worship and Asherah-worship -had tended to obliterate the sense that the "calves" -were cherubic emblems of Jehovah; and were it not -for some confusions of this kind, it is inconceivable -that Jehoram ben-Jehu should have restored the -Asherah which his father had removed. Be that as -it may, Bethel and Gilgal seem to have become centres -of corruption. Dan is scarcely once alluded to as a -scene of the calf-worship.</p> - -<p>Others, then, might be deceived by the surface-glitter -of extended empire in the days of Jeroboam II. Not -so the true prophets. It has often happened—as to -Persia, when, in <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 388, she dictated the Peace of -Antalcidas, and to Papal Rome in the days of the -Jubilee of 1300, and to Philip II. of Spain in the year -of the Armada, and to Louis XIV. in 1667—that a -nation has seemed to be at its zenith of pomp and -power on the very eve of some tremendous catastrophe. -Amos and Hosea saw that such a catastrophe was at -hand for Israel, because they knew that Divine punishment -inevitably dogs the heels of insolence and crime. -The loftiness of Israel's privilege involved the utterness -of her ruin. "You only have I known of all the -families of the earth: therefore I will visit upon you -all your iniquities."<a name="FNanchor_327_327" id="FNanchor_327_327"></a><a href="#Footnote_327_327" class="fnanchor">[327]</a></p> - -<p>Such prophecies, so eloquent, so uncompromising, so -varied, and so constantly disseminated among the -people, first by public harangues, then in writing, could<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_199" id="Page_199">[Pg 199]</a></span> -no longer be neglected. Amos, with his natural -culture, his rhythmic utterances, and his inextinguishable -fire, was far different from the wild fanatics, with their -hairy garments, and sudden movements, and long locks, -and cries, and self-inflicted wounds, with whom Israel -had been familiar since the days of Elijah whom they -all imitated. So long as this inspired peasant confined -himself to moral denunciations the aristocracy and -priesthood of Samaria could afford comfortably to -despise him. What were moral denunciations to them? -What harm was there in ivory palaces and refined -feasts? This man was a mere red socialist who tried -to undermine the customs of society. The hold of the -upper classes on the people, whom their exactions had -burdened with hopeless debt, and whom they could -with impunity crush into slavery, was too strong to -be shaken by the "hysteric gush" of a philanthropic -faddist and temperance fanatic like this. But when he -had the enormous presumption to mention publicly the -name of their victorious king, and to say that Jehovah -would rise against him with the sword, it was time for -the clergy to interfere, and to send the intruder back -to his native obscurity.</p> - -<p>So Amaziah, the priest of Bethel,<a name="FNanchor_328_328" id="FNanchor_328_328"></a><a href="#Footnote_328_328" class="fnanchor">[328]</a> invoked the king's -authority. "Amos," he said to the king, "hath conspired -against thee in the midst of the house of Israel." -The charge was grossly false, but it did well enough -to serve the priest's purpose. "The land is not able -to bear all his words."</p> - -<p>That was true; for when nations have chosen to -abide by their own vicious courses, and refuse to listen<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_200" id="Page_200">[Pg 200]</a></span> -to the voice of warning, they are impatient of rebuke. -They refuse to hear when God calls to them.</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"For when we in our viciousness grow hard,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Oh misery on it! the wise gods seal our eyes;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">In our own filth drop our clear judgments; make us<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Adore our errors; laugh at us while we strut<br /></span> -<span class="i1">To our confusion."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>The priest tried further to inflame the king's anger -by telling him two more of Amos's supposed predictions. -He had prophesied (which was a false inference) -that Israel should be led away captive out of their -own land,<a name="FNanchor_329_329" id="FNanchor_329_329"></a><a href="#Footnote_329_329" class="fnanchor">[329]</a> and had also prophesied (which was a -perversion of the fact) "that Jeroboam <i>should die</i> by -the sword."</p> - -<p>At the first prophecy Jeroboam probably smiled. It -might indeed come true in the long-run. If he was a -man of prescience as well as of prowess, he probably -foresaw that the elements of ruin lurked in his transient -success, and that though, for the present, Assyria was -occupied in other directions, it was unlikely that the -weaker Israel would escape the fate of the far more -powerful Syria. As for the personal prophecy, he was -strong, and was honoured, and had his army and his -guards. He would take his chance. Nor does it seem -to have troubled any one that Amos looked for the -ultimate union of Israel with Judah. Since the time -of Joash the inheritance of David had been but as -"a ruined booth" (ix. 11); but Amos prophesied its -restoration. This touch may have been added later, -when he wrote and published his "burdens"; but he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_201" id="Page_201">[Pg 201]</a></span> -did not hesitate to speak as if the two kingdoms were -really and properly one.<a name="FNanchor_330_330" id="FNanchor_330_330"></a><a href="#Footnote_330_330" class="fnanchor">[330]</a></p> - -<p>We are not told that Jeroboam II. interfered with -the prophet in any way.<a name="FNanchor_331_331" id="FNanchor_331_331"></a><a href="#Footnote_331_331" class="fnanchor">[331]</a> Had he done so, he would -have been rebuked and denounced for it. He probably -went no further than to allow the priest and the -prophet to settle the matter between themselves. Perhaps -he gave a contemptuous permission that, if -Amaziah thought it worth while to send the prophet -back into Judah, he might do so.</p> - -<p>Armed with this nonchalant mandate, Amaziah, with -more mildness and good-humour than might have been -expected from one of his class, said to Amos, "O -Seer,<a name="FNanchor_332_332" id="FNanchor_332_332"></a><a href="#Footnote_332_332" class="fnanchor">[332]</a> go home, and eat thy bread, and prophesy to -thy heart's content at home; but do not prophesy any -more at Bethel, for it is the king's sanctuary and the -king's court."</p> - -<p>Amos obeyed perforce, but stopped to say that he -had not prophesied out of his own mouth, but by -Jehovah's bidding. He then hurled at the priest a -message of doom as frightful as that which Jeremiah<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_202" id="Page_202">[Pg 202]</a></span> -pronounced upon Pashur, when that priest smote him -on the face. His wife should be a harlot in the -city; his sons and daughters should be slain; his -inheritance should be divided; he should die in a -polluted land; and Israel should go into captivity. -And as for his mission, he justified it by the fact -that he was not one of an hereditary or a professional -community; he was no prophet or prophet's -son. Such men might—like Zedekiah, the son of -Chenaanah, and his four hundred abettors—be led into -mere function and professionalism, into manufactured -enthusiasm and simulated inspiration. From such -communities freshness, unconventionality, courage, were -hardly to be expected. They would philippise at -times; they would get to love their order and their -privileges better than their message, and themselves -best of all. It is the tendency of organised bodies -to be tempted into conventionality, and to sink into -banded unions chiefly concerned in the protection of -their own prestige. Not such was Amos. He was a -peasant herdsman in whose heart had burned the -inspiration of Jehovah and the wrath against moral -misdoing till they had burst into flame. It was -indignation against iniquity which had called Amos -from the flocks and the sycomores to launch against -an apostatising people the menace of doom. In that -grief and indignation he heard the voice and received -the mandate of the Lord of hosts. He heads the long -line of literary prophets whose priceless utterances are -preserved in the Old Testament. The inestimable -value of their teaching lies most of all in the fact that -they were—like Moses—preachers of the moral law; -and that, like the Book of the Covenant, which is the -most ancient and the most valuable part of the Laws<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_203" id="Page_203">[Pg 203]</a></span> -of the Pentateuch, they count external service as no -better than the small dust of the balance in comparison -with righteousness and true holiness.</p> - -<p>The rest of the predictions of Amos were added at -a later date. They dwelt on the certainty and the -awful details of the coming overthrow; the doom of -the idolaters of Gilgal and Beersheba; the inevitable -swiftness of the catastrophe in which Samaria should -be sifted like corn in a sieve in spite of her incorrigible -security.<a name="FNanchor_333_333" id="FNanchor_333_333"></a><a href="#Footnote_333_333" class="fnanchor">[333]</a> Yet the ruin should not be absolute. -"Thus saith Jehovah: As the shepherd teareth out -of the mouth of the lion two legs and the piece of an -ear, so shall the children of Israel be rescued, that sit -in Samaria on the corner of a couch, and on the damask -of a bed."</p> - -<p>The Hebrew Prophets almost invariably weave -together the triple strands of warning, exhortation, -and hope. Hitherto Amos has not had a word of -hope to utter. At last, however, he lets a glimpse -of the rainbow irradiate the gloom. The overthrow -of Israel should be accompanied by the restoration of -the fallen booth of David, and, under the rule of a -scion of that house, Israel should return from captivity -to enjoy days of peaceful happiness, and to be rooted -up no more.<a name="FNanchor_334_334" id="FNanchor_334_334"></a><a href="#Footnote_334_334" class="fnanchor">[334]</a></p> - -<hr class="tb" /> - -<p>Hosea, the son of Beeri, was of a somewhat later -date than Amos. He, too, "became electric," to flash -into meaner and corrupted minds the conviction that -formalism is nothing, and that moral sincerity is all in -all. That which God requires is not ritual service, -but truth in the inward parts. He is one of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_204" id="Page_204">[Pg 204]</a></span> -saddest of the prophets; but though he mingles prophecies -of mercy with his menaces of wrath, the -general tenor of his oracles is the same. He pictures -the crimes of Ephraim by the image of domestic unfaithfulness, -and bids Judah to take warning from the -curse involved in her apostasy.<a name="FNanchor_335_335" id="FNanchor_335_335"></a><a href="#Footnote_335_335" class="fnanchor">[335]</a> Many of his allusions -touch upon the days of that deluge of anarchy which -followed the death of Jeroboam II. (iv.-vi. 3). That -he was a Northerner appears from the fact that he -speaks of the King of Israel as "our king" (vii. 5). -Yet he seems to blame the revolt of Jeroboam I. -(i. 11, viii. 4), although a prophet had originated it, -and he openly aspires after the reunion of the Twelve -Tribes under a king of the House of David (iii. 5). -He points more distinctly to Assyria, which he frequently -names as the scourge of the Divine vengeance, -and indicates how vain is the hope of the party which -relied on the alliance of Egypt.<a name="FNanchor_336_336" id="FNanchor_336_336"></a><a href="#Footnote_336_336" class="fnanchor">[336]</a> He speaks with far -more distinct contempt of the cherub at Bethel and -the shrine at Gilgal, and says scornfully, "Thy calf, O -Samaria, has cast thee off."<a name="FNanchor_337_337" id="FNanchor_337_337"></a><a href="#Footnote_337_337" class="fnanchor">[337]</a> Shalmaneser had taken -Beth-Arbel, and dashed to pieces mother and children. -Such would be the fate of the cities of Israel.<a name="FNanchor_338_338" id="FNanchor_338_338"></a><a href="#Footnote_338_338" class="fnanchor">[338]</a> Yet -Hosea, like Amos, cannot conclude with words of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_205" id="Page_205">[Pg 205]</a></span> -wrath and woe, and he ends with a lovely song of the -days when Ephraim should be restored, after her true -repentance, by the loving tenderness of God.</p> - -<p>Jeroboam II. must have been aware of some at -least of these prophecies. Those of Hosea must have -impressed him all the more because Hosea was a -prophet of his own kingdom, and all of his allusions -were to such ancient and famous shrines of Ephraim -as Mizpeh, Tabor, Bethel, Gilgal, Shechem,<a name="FNanchor_339_339" id="FNanchor_339_339"></a><a href="#Footnote_339_339" class="fnanchor">[339]</a> Jezreel, -and Lebanon. He was the Jeremiah of the North, -and a passionate patriotism breathes through his -melancholy strains. Yet in the powerful rule of -Jeroboam II. he can only see a godless militarism -founded upon massacre (i. 4), and he felt himself to -be the prophet of decadence. Page after page rings -with wailing, and with denunciations of drunkenness, -robbery, and whoredom—"swearing, lying, killing, -stealing, and adultery" (iv. 2).</p> - -<p>If Jeroboam was as wise and great as he seemed to -have been, he must have seen with his own eyes the -ominous clouds on the far horizon, and the deep-seated -corruption which was eating like a cancer into -the heart of his people. Probably, like many another -great sovereign—like Marcus Aurelius when he noted -the worthlessness of his son Commodus, like Charlemagne -when he burst into tears at the sight of the -ships of the Vikings—his thoughts were like those of -the ancient and modern proverbs—"When I am dead, -let earth be mixed with fire." We have no trace -that Jeroboam treated Hosea as did those guilty -priests to whom he was a rebuke, and who called him -"a fool" and "mad" (ix. 7, 8, iv. 6-8, v. 2). Yet -the aged king—he must have reached the unusual age<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_206" id="Page_206">[Pg 206]</a></span> -of seventy-three at least, before he ended the longest -and most successful reign in the annals of Israel—could -hardly have anticipated that within half a year -of his death his secure throne would be shaken to its -foundation, his dynasty be hurled into oblivion, and -that Israel, to whom, as long as he lived, mighty -kingdoms had curtsied, should,</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Like a forlorn and desperate castaway,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Do shameful execution on herself."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>Yet so it was. Jeroboam II. was succeeded by no -less than six other kings, but he was the last who -died a natural death. Every one of his successors fell -a victim to the assassin or the conqueror. His son -Zachariah ("Remembered by Jehovah") succeeded him -(<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 740), the fourth in descent from Jehu. Considering -the long reign of his father, he must have ascended -the throne at a mature age. But he was the child -of evil times. That he should not interrupt the "calf"-worship -was a matter of course; but if he be the king -of whom we catch a glimpse in Hos. vii. 2-7, we see -that he partook deeply of the depravity of his day. -We are there presented with a deplorable picture. -There was thievishness at home, and bands of marauding -bandits began to appear from abroad. The king was -surrounded by a desperate knot of wicked counsellors, -who fooled him to the top of his bent, and corrupted -him to the utmost of his capacity. They were all -scorners and adulterers, whose furious passions the -prophet compares to the glowing heat of an oven heated -by the baker. They made the king glad with their -wickedness, and the princes with lying flatteries. On -the royal birthday, apparently at some public feast, -this band of infamous revellers, who were the boon<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_207" id="Page_207">[Pg 207]</a></span> -companions of Zachariah, first made him sick with -bottles of wine, and then having set an ambush in -waiting, murdered the effeminate and self-indulgent -debauchee before all the people.<a name="FNanchor_340_340" id="FNanchor_340_340"></a><a href="#Footnote_340_340" class="fnanchor">[340]</a> The scene reads -like the assassination of a Commodus or an Elagabalus. -No one was likely to raise a hand in his favour. Like -our Edward II., he was a weakling who followed a -great and warlike father. It was evident that troublous -times were near at hand, and nothing but the worst -disasters could ensue if there was no one better than -such a drunkard as Zachariah to stand at the helm -of state.</p> - -<p>So did the dynasty of the mighty Jehu expire like -a torch blown out in stench and smoke.</p> - -<p>Its close is memorable most of all because it evoked -the magnificent moral and spiritual teaching of Hebrew -prophecy. The ideal prophet and the ordinary priest -are as necessarily opposed to each other as the saint -and the formalist. The glory of prophecy lies in its -recognition that right is always right, and wrong always -wrong, apart from all expediency and all casuistry, -apart from "all prejudices, private interests, and partial -affections." "What Jehovah demands," they taught, -"is righteousness—neither more nor less; what He -hates is injustice. Sin or offence to the Deity is a -thing of purely moral character. Morality is that for<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_208" id="Page_208">[Pg 208]</a></span> -the sake of which all other things exist; it is the most -essential element of all sincere religion. It is no -postulate, no idea, but a necessity and a fact; the most -intensely living of human powers—Jehovah, the God -of hosts. In wrath, in ruin, this holy reality makes -its existence known; it annihilates all that is hollow -and false."<a name="FNanchor_341_341" id="FNanchor_341_341"></a><a href="#Footnote_341_341" class="fnanchor">[341]</a></p> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_209" id="Page_209">[Pg 209]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XIX" id="CHAPTER_XIX">CHAPTER XIX</a></h2> - -<h3><i>AZARIAH-UZZIAH</i> (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 783(?)-737)</h3> - -<h3><i>JOTHAM</i> (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 737-735)</h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xv. 1-7, 32-38</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"This is vanity, and it is a sore sickness."—<span class="smcap">Eccles.</span> vi. 2.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>Before we watch the last "glimmerings and -decays" of the Northern Kingdom, we must once -more revert to the fortunes of the House of David. -Judah partook of the better fortunes of Israel. She, -too, enjoyed the respite caused by the crippling of the -power of Syria, and the cessation from aggression of -the Assyrian kings, who, for a century, were either -unambitious monarchs like Assurdan, or were engaged -in fighting on their own northern and eastern frontiers. -Judah, too, like Israel, was happy in the long and wise -governance of a faithful king.</p> - -<p>This king was Azariah ("My strength is Jehovah"), -the son of Amaziah. He is called Uzziah by the -Chronicler, and in some verses of the brief references -to his long reign in the Book of Kings. It is not -certain that he was the eldest son of Amaziah;<a name="FNanchor_342_342" id="FNanchor_342_342"></a><a href="#Footnote_342_342" class="fnanchor">[342]</a> but he -was so distinctly the ablest, that, at the age of sixteen, -he was chosen king by "all the people." His official<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_210" id="Page_210">[Pg 210]</a></span> -title to the world must have been Azariah, for in that -form his name occurs in the Assyrian records. Uzziah -seems to have been the more familiar title which he -bore among his people.<a name="FNanchor_343_343" id="FNanchor_343_343"></a><a href="#Footnote_343_343" class="fnanchor">[343]</a> There seems to be an allusion -to both names—Jehovah-his-helper, and Jehovah-his-strength—in -the Chronicles: "God <i>helped him</i>, and -made him to prosper; and his name spread far abroad, -and he was marvellously helped, <i>till he was strong</i>."</p> - -<p>The Book of Kings only devotes a few verses to -him; but from the Chronicler we learn much more -about his prosperous activity. His first achievement -was to recover and fortify the port of Elath, on the Red -Sea,<a name="FNanchor_344_344" id="FNanchor_344_344"></a><a href="#Footnote_344_344" class="fnanchor">[344]</a> and to reduce the Edomites to the position they -had held in the earlier days of his father's reign. This -gave security to his commerce, and at once "his name -spread far abroad, even to the entering in of Egypt."</p> - -<p>He next subdued the Philistines; took Gath, Jabneh, -and Ashdod; dismantled their fortifications, filled them -with Hebrew colonists, and "smote all Palestine with -a rod."<a name="FNanchor_345_345" id="FNanchor_345_345"></a><a href="#Footnote_345_345" class="fnanchor">[345]</a></p> - -<p>He then chastised the roving Arabs of the Negeb or -south country in Gur-Baal and Maon, and suppressed -their plundering incursions.</p> - -<p>His next achievement was to reduce the Ammonite<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_211" id="Page_211">[Pg 211]</a></span> -Emrs to the position of tributaries, and to enforce -from them rights of pasturage for his large flocks, not -only in the low country (<i>shephelah</i>), but in the southern -wilderness (<i>midbar</i>), and in the <i>carmels</i> or fertile -grounds among the Trans-Jordanic hills.</p> - -<p>Having thus subdued his enemies on all sides, he -turned his attention to home affairs—built towers, -strengthened the walls of Jerusalem at its most assailable -points, provided catapults and other instruments -of war, and rendered a permanent benefit to Jerusalem -by irrigation and the storing of rain-water in tanks.</p> - -<p>All these improvements so greatly increased his -wealth and importance that he was able to renew -David's old force of heroes (Gibborim), and to increase -their number from six hundred to two thousand six -hundred, whom he carefully enrolled, equipped with -armour, and trained in the use of engines of war. -And he not only extended his boundaries southwards -and eastwards, but appears to have been strong enough, -after the death of Jeroboam II., to make an expedition -northwards, and to have headed a Syrian coalition -against Tiglath-Pileser III., in <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 738. He is mentioned -in two notable fragments of the annals of the -eighth year of this Assyrian king. He is there called -Azrijahu, and both his forces and those of Hamath -seem to have suffered a defeat.<a name="FNanchor_346_346" id="FNanchor_346_346"></a><a href="#Footnote_346_346" class="fnanchor">[346]</a></p> - -<p>It is distressing to find that a king so good and so -great ended his days in overwhelming and irretrievable<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_212" id="Page_212">[Pg 212]</a></span> -misfortune. The glorious reign had a ghastly conclusion. -All that the historian tells us is that "the Lord -smote the king, so that he was a leper, and dwelt in a -several [<i>i.e.</i>, a separate] house." The word rendered -"a several house" may perhaps mean (as in the margin -of the A.V.) "a lazar house," like the <i>Beit el Massakn</i> -or "house of the unfortunate," the hospital or abode -of lepers, outside the walls of Jerusalem.<a name="FNanchor_347_347" id="FNanchor_347_347"></a><a href="#Footnote_347_347" class="fnanchor">[347]</a> The rendering -is uncertain, but it is by no means impossible that -the prevalence of the affliction had, even in those early -days, created a retreat for those thus smitten, especially -as they formed a numerous class. Obviously the king -could no more fulfil his royal duties. A leper becomes -a horrible object, and no one would have been more -anxious than the unhappy Azariah himself to conceal -his aspect from the eyes of his people.<a name="FNanchor_348_348" id="FNanchor_348_348"></a><a href="#Footnote_348_348" class="fnanchor">[348]</a> His son -Jotham was set over the household; and though he is not -called a regent or joint-king—for this institution does -not seem to have existed among the ancient Hebrews—he -acted as judge over the people of the land.</p> - -<p>We are told that Isaiah wrote the annals of this -king's reign, but we do not know whether it was from -Isaiah's biography that the Chronicler took the story -of the manner in which Uzziah was smitten with -leprosy. The Chronicler says that his heart was puffed -up with his successes and his prosperity, and that he -was consequently led to thrust himself into the priest's<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_213" id="Page_213">[Pg 213]</a></span> -office by burning incense in the Temple.<a name="FNanchor_349_349" id="FNanchor_349_349"></a><a href="#Footnote_349_349" class="fnanchor">[349]</a> Solomon -appears to have done the same without the least question -of opposition; but now the times were changed, and -Azariah, the high priest,<a name="FNanchor_350_350" id="FNanchor_350_350"></a><a href="#Footnote_350_350" class="fnanchor">[350]</a> and eighty of his colleagues -went in a body to prevent Uzziah, to rebuke him, and -to order him out of the Holy Place.<a name="FNanchor_351_351" id="FNanchor_351_351"></a><a href="#Footnote_351_351" class="fnanchor">[351]</a> The opposition -kindled him into the fiercest anger, and at this moment -of hot altercation the red spot of leprosy suddenly rose -and burned upon his forehead. The priests looked -with horror on the fatal sign; and the stricken king, -himself horrified at this awful visitation of God, ceased -to resist the priests, and rushed forth to relieve the -Temple of his unclean presence, and to linger out the -sad remnant of his days in the living death of that -most dishonouring disease. Surely no man was ever -smitten down from the summits of splendour to a lower -abyss of unspeakable calamity! We can but trust that -the misery only laid waste the few last years of his -reign; for Jotham was twenty-five when he began to -reign, and he must have been more than a mere boy -when he was set to perform his father's duties.</p> - -<p>So the glory of Uzziah faded into dust and darkness. -At the age of sixty-eight death came as the welcome -release from his miseries, and "they buried him with -his fathers in the City of David." The Levitically<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_214" id="Page_214">[Pg 214]</a></span> -scrupulous Chronicler adds that he was not laid in the -actual sepulchre of his fathers, but in a field of burial -which belonged to them—"for they said, He is a leper." -The general outline of his reign resembled that of his -father's. It began well; it fell by pride; it closed in -misery.</p> - -<p>The annals of his son Jotham were not eventful, and -he died at the age of forty-one or earlier. He is said -to have reigned sixteen years, but there are insuperable -difficulties about the chronology of his reign, which can -only be solved by hazardous conjectures.<a name="FNanchor_352_352" id="FNanchor_352_352"></a><a href="#Footnote_352_352" class="fnanchor">[352]</a> He was a -good king, "howbeit the high places were not removed." -The Chronicler speaks of him chiefly as a -builder. He built or restored the northern gate of -the Temple, and defended Judah with fortresses and -towns. But the glory and strength of his father's reign -faded away under his rule. He did indeed suppress -a revolt of the Ammonites, and exacted from them a -heavy indemnity; but shortly afterwards the inaction -of Assyria led to an alliance between Pekah, King of -Israel, and Rezin, King of Damascus; and these kings -harassed Jotham—perhaps because he refused to become -a member of their coalition. The good king must also -have been pained by the signs of moral degeneracy all -around him in the customs of his own people. It was -"in the year that King Uzziah died" that Isaiah saw -his first vision, and he gives us a deplorable picture of -contemporary laxity. Whatever the king may have -been, the princes were no better than "rulers of Sodom," -and the people were "people of Gomorrha." There -was abundance of lip-worship, but little sincerity; plentiful -religionism, but no godliness. Superstition went<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_215" id="Page_215">[Pg 215]</a></span> -hand in hand with formalism, and the scrupulosity of -outward service was made a substitute for righteousness -and true holiness. This was the deadliest characteristic -of this epoch, as we find it portrayed in the first -chapter of Isaiah. The faithful city had become a -harlot—but not in outward semblance. She "reflected -heaven on her surface, and hid Gomorrha in her heart." -Righteousness had dwelt in her—but now murderers; -but the murderers wore phylacteries, and for a pretence -made long prayers. It was this deep-seated hypocrisy, -this pretence of religion without the reality, which -called forth the loudest crashes of Isaiah's thunder. -There is more hope for a country avowedly guilty and -irreligious than for one which makes its scrupulous -ceremonialism a cloak of maliciousness. And thus there -lay at the heart of Isaiah's message that protest for -bare morality, as constituting the end and the essence -of religion, which we find in all the earliest and greatest -prophets:—</p> - -<p> -"Hear the word of the Lord, ye rulers of Sodom;<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Give ear unto the Law of our God, ye people of Gomorrha!</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the Lord.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I am full of the burnt-offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he-goats.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">When ye come to see My face, who hath required this at your hands, to trample My courts?</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Bring no more vain oblations!</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Incense is an abomination unto Me:</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">New moon and sabbath, the calling of assemblies—</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I cannot away with iniquity and the solemn meeting...</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Wash you! make you clean!"<a name="FNanchor_353_353" id="FNanchor_353_353"></a><a href="#Footnote_353_353" class="fnanchor">[353]</a></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>Of Jotham we hear nothing more. He died a natural<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_216" id="Page_216">[Pg 216]</a></span> -death at an early age. If the years of his reign are -counted from the time when his father's affliction -devolved on him the responsibilities of office, it is -probable that he did not long survive the illustrious -leper, but was buried soon after him in the City of -David his father.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_217" id="Page_217">[Pg 217]</a></span></p> - - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XX" id="CHAPTER_XX">CHAPTER XX.</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE AGONY OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM.</i></h3> - -<table class="middle" summary="Northern Kingdom Kings"> - <tbody> - <tr> - <td> </td> - <td class="center"><span class="smcap">b.c.</span></td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Shallum</td> - <td>740</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Menahem</td> - <td>740-737</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Pekahiah</td> - <td>737-735</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Pekah</td> - <td>735-734</td> - </tr> - </tbody> -</table> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xv. 8-31</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"Blood toucheth blood."—<span class="smcap">Hos.</span> iv. 2.</p> - -<p>"The revolters are profuse in murders."—<span class="smcap">Hos.</span> v. 2.</p> - -<p>"They have set up kings, but not by Me: they have made princes, -and I knew it not."—<span class="smcap">Hos.</span> viii. 4.</p> - -<p>"Non tam reges fuere quam fures, latrones, et tyranni."—<span class="smcap">Witsius</span>, -<i>Decaph.</i>, 326.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>With the death of Zachariah begins the acute -agony of Israel's dissolution. Four kings were -murdered in forty years. Indeed, within two centuries, -at least nine kings—Nadab, Elah, Zimri, Tibni, Jehoram, -Zachariah, Shallum, Pekahiah, Pekah—had made the -steps of the throne slippery with blood. Except in the -house of Omri, all the kings of Israel either left no -sons or left them to be slain. Amos, by his vision -of the basket of summer fruit, had intimated that the -sins of Israel were ripe for punishment, and the lesson -had been emphasised by the paronomasia of <i>quts</i>, -"summer," and <i>queets</i>, "end."<a name="FNanchor_354_354" id="FNanchor_354_354"></a><a href="#Footnote_354_354" class="fnanchor">[354]</a> The prophet had -singled four out of many crimes as the cause of her -ruin. They were (1) greedy oppression of the poor;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_218" id="Page_218">[Pg 218]</a></span> -(2) land-grabbing; (3) licentious and idolatrous revelries; -(4) cruelty to poor debtors, and rioting on the -proceeds of unjust gains. In their drunkenness they -even tempted God's Nazarites to break their vows. -"Behold," saith Jehovah, "I am pressed under you, as -a cart is pressed that is full of sheaves." Even women -shared in the common intoxication, and showed themselves -utterly shameless, so that Amos contemptuously -calls them "fat cows of Bashan upon the mountain of -Samaria," whom in punishment the brutal conqueror -should drag by the hair out of their ivory palaces, as a -fisherman drags his prey out of the water by hooks.<a name="FNanchor_355_355" id="FNanchor_355_355"></a><a href="#Footnote_355_355" class="fnanchor">[355]</a></p> - -<p>Shallum, son of Jabesh, the unknown murderer of -Zachariah and the usurper of his throne, suffered the -fate of Zimri, and only reigned for one month. If his -conspiracy was marked by the odious circumstances -of treachery and corruption, which we infer from the -allusions of Hosea, Shallum richly deserved the swift -retribution which fell upon him. He seems to have -destroyed Zachariah by means of his best affections—under -the guise of friendship, in the midst of boon -companionship. But the slayer of his master had no -peace, and from the moment of his fruitless crime the -unhappy country seems to have been plunged in the -horrors of civil war. Some dim glimpses of the evils -of the day are gained from the earlier Zechariah,<a name="FNanchor_356_356" id="FNanchor_356_356"></a><a href="#Footnote_356_356" class="fnanchor">[356]</a> just -as some dim glimpses of the horrors of Rome in the -days of the later Csars may be seen in the Apocalypse. -The prophet speaks of three shepherds cut off in one<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_219" id="Page_219">[Pg 219]</a></span> -month, who abhorred God, and His soul was impatient -at them.<a name="FNanchor_357_357" id="FNanchor_357_357"></a><a href="#Footnote_357_357" class="fnanchor">[357]</a></p> - -<p>Just as Galba, Otho, and Vitellius flit across the -stage of the Empire amid war and assassinations, so -Zachariah and Shallum are swept away by "dagger-thrusts -through the purple." Was there a third? -Ewald and others think that they detect a shadowy -outline of him and of his name in 2 Kings xv. 10. If -so, his name was Kobolam, but we know no more of -him beyond the fact that "he was, and is not." For -the sacred annals are but little concerned with this -bloody phantasmagoria of feeble kings, who ruled amid -usurpation, anarchy, hostile attacks from without, and -civil war within. "Israel," said Hosea, "hath cast off -the thing that is good: the enemy shall pursue him. -They have set up kings, but not by Me: they have -made princes, and I knew it not." "They are all as -hot as an oven, and have devoured their judges; all -their kings have fallen; there is none among them that -calleth upon Me."<a name="FNanchor_358_358" id="FNanchor_358_358"></a><a href="#Footnote_358_358" class="fnanchor">[358]</a></p> - -<p>It was perhaps during this distracted epoch that for -one moment there was an attempt to place the ruling -authority of the nation in the hands of the prophet -himself. So it would appear from Zech. xi. 7-14. Of -course these chapters may be allegorical throughout, as, -in any case, they are in great part. But if so, it becomes -more difficult to understand the meaning. What the -prophet says is as follows:—</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_220" id="Page_220">[Pg 220]</a></span></p> - -<p>First, as though he saw the terrible conflagration of -the Assyrian tyranny rolling southwards, and felt it -to be irresistible, he bids Lebanon open her doors, that -the fire may devour her cedars. There is perhaps an -allusion to the death of Jeroboam II. in the words, -"Howl fir tree, for the cedar is fallen." He sees -in vision the forces of devastation raging among the -oaks of Bashan, the forest and the vintage, while the -shepherds cry, and the ousted lions roar in vain. Then -Jehovah bids him feed "the flock of the slaughter"—the -flock sold remorselessly by its rich possessors, and -slain, and left unpitied, as the people were despoiled -by its nobles and its kings. The prophet undertakes -the charge of the miserable flock, and takes two staves, -one of which he calls "Prosperity," and the other -"Union." While he was thus engaged three shepherds -were cut off in one month,<a name="FNanchor_359_359" id="FNanchor_359_359"></a><a href="#Footnote_359_359" class="fnanchor">[359]</a> whom he loathed, and who -abhorred him. But he finds his task hopeless, and -flings it up; and in sign that his covenant with the -people is broken, he breaks his staff "Prosperity." -The nation refused to pay him anything for his services, -except a paltry sum of thirty pieces of silver, and these -he disdainfully flung into the sacred treasury.<a name="FNanchor_360_360" id="FNanchor_360_360"></a><a href="#Footnote_360_360" class="fnanchor">[360]</a> Then -seeing that all hope of union between Israel and Judah -was at an end, he broke his staff "Union." Lastly, -Jehovah says He will raise up a foolish, neglectful, -cruel shepherd who would care for nothing but to eat -the flesh of the fat and break the hoofs of the flock. -And as for this worthless shepherd, the sword should -be upon his arm and in his right eye; his arm shall be -dried up, and his right eye utterly darkened.</p> - -<p>By this cruel and self-seeking shepherd is probably<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_221" id="Page_221">[Pg 221]</a></span> -meant Menahem. He had been, according to Josephus, -the captain of the guard, and was living at Tirzah, the -old beautiful capital of the land. From Tirzah, where -he occupied the position of the captain of the chariots, -he marched on the ill-supported Shallum. Samaria -apparently offered no protection to the usurper. -Menahem defeated him and put him to death. Then -he proceeded to enforce the allegiance of the rest of the -country. An otherwise unknown town of the name -of Tiphsach<a name="FNanchor_361_361" id="FNanchor_361_361"></a><a href="#Footnote_361_361" class="fnanchor">[361]</a> ventured to resist him. Menahem conquered -it, and perhaps thinking, as Machiavelli thought, -that princes had better exhibit their utmost cruelty -at first, to deter any further opposition, he let loose his -ferocity on the town in a way which created a shuddering -remembrance. As though he had been one of the -ferocious heathen, who had never been restrained by -the knowledge of God, he exhibited the extreme of -callous brutality by ripping up all the women that were -with child.<a name="FNanchor_362_362" id="FNanchor_362_362"></a><a href="#Footnote_362_362" class="fnanchor">[362]</a> In this he followed the remorseless -example of Hazael. Hosea had prophesied that this -should be the fate of Samaria;<a name="FNanchor_363_363" id="FNanchor_363_363"></a><a href="#Footnote_363_363" class="fnanchor">[363]</a> Amos had denounced -the Ammonites for acting thus in the cities of Gilead;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_222" id="Page_222">[Pg 222]</a></span><a name="FNanchor_364_364" id="FNanchor_364_364"></a><a href="#Footnote_364_364" class="fnanchor">[364]</a> -Shalmaneser III. had, in <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 732, thus avenged himself -on the resistance of Beth-Arbel,<a name="FNanchor_365_365" id="FNanchor_365_365"></a><a href="#Footnote_365_365" class="fnanchor">[365]</a> and Assyria was ultimately -to meet an analogous retribution,<a name="FNanchor_366_366" id="FNanchor_366_366"></a><a href="#Footnote_366_366" class="fnanchor">[366]</a> as also was -Babylon.<a name="FNanchor_367_367" id="FNanchor_367_367"></a><a href="#Footnote_367_367" class="fnanchor">[367]</a> But that a king of Ephraim, of God's chosen -people, should act thus to his own brethren was a -horrible portent, ominous of swift destruction.</p> - -<p>And the vengeance came. Menahem reigned, at -least in name, for ten years; for the sword which had -slain mothers with their unborn infants reduced the -stricken people to terrified silence. But at this epoch -Assyria woke once more from her lethargy, and became -the scourge of God to the guilty people and their -guiltier kings. For a whole century the Assyrians -had either been governed by kings who had abjured -the lust of blood and conquest, or had been too seriously -occupied on their own eastern and northern frontiers -to intermeddle with the southern kingdoms, or break -down the barriers erected by the confederacy of Hamath -and Damascus between Nineveh and the weaker -principalities of Palestine. But now (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 745) there -came to the throne a king who, in Chalda, was known -by the name of Pul, and in Assyria by the name of -Tiglath-Pileser;<a name="FNanchor_368_368" id="FNanchor_368_368"></a><a href="#Footnote_368_368" class="fnanchor">[368]</a> and being too formidable for any -power to stay his path, he marched against Menahem. -Already he was lord of the world from the Caspian to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_223" id="Page_223">[Pg 223]</a></span> -the Gulf of Persia; already he had subdued Babylonia, -Elam, Media, Armenia, eastward—Mesopotamia and -Syria westward. Who was Menahem, the petty -usurper of a tenth-rate kingdom, that he should withstand -his power or even retard his advance?</p> - -<p>The cruel usurper was in no condition to resist him. -The brand of Cain was on him and his kingdom. -How could the weak, impoverished, harassed troops -of Israel stand up in battle against those numberless -serried ranks, or withstand their tremendous discipline? -If the very name of Persia once struck terror into -the brave Greeks before the spell of Persian ascendency -was broken at Marathon, Thermopyl, and -Salamis, much more did the name of Assyria make -the hearts of the wretched Israelites melt like water. -They now for the first time saw those bearded warriors -with their broad swords, their tremendous bows, their -fierce, sensual faces, their thickset figures. In the -language of the prophets we still hear the echo of the -fears which they excited by their swift, unfaltering -marches, their sleepless vigilance, their girded loins, -stout sandals, and barbed arrows.<a name="FNanchor_369_369" id="FNanchor_369_369"></a><a href="#Footnote_369_369" class="fnanchor">[369]</a></p> - -<p>"Their horses' hoofs," says Isaiah, "shall be like -flint, and their wheels like a whirlwind: their roaring -shall be like a lion, they shall roar like young lions; -yea, they shall roar, and lay hold of the prey, and -carry it away safe, and there shall be none to deliver. -And they shall roar against them in that day like the -roaring of the sea; and if one look unto the land, -behold darkness and distress, and the light is darkened -in the clouds thereof."</p> - -<p>Ancient Assyria lay beneath the Snowy Mountains -of Kurdistan; and its capital, Nineveh—near Mosul,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_224" id="Page_224">[Pg 224]</a></span> -Kouyunjik, and Neby-Junus—lay six hundred miles -from the Gulf of Persia. The people spoke, as their -descendants still speak, a dialect of Syriac, akin both -grammatically and structurally to Hebrew. Assyria -was constantly at war with Babylonia; but for the -most part the kings of Assyria held Babylon in subjection, -and Tiglath-Pileser was a king of the Chaldans -under the name Pul, as well as a king of Nineveh.</p> - -<p>Menahem was warrior enough to know how hopeless -it was to struggle against these trained forces. He -was not even secure on his own throne. He thought it -best to offer himself without resistance as a feudatory, -if the Assyrian King would confirm his sovereignty. -Tiglath-Pileser did not think Menahem worth more -trouble, and was graciously pleased to accept by way -of bribe a tribute of a thousand talents of silver, or -about 125,000. This, however, as we learn from -the <i>Eponym Canon</i>, was not all. Menahem had to -pay a further tribute year by year. Later on, in 738, -Shalmaneser mentions Minik-himmi (Menahem), as well -as Rasunnu (Rezin), among his tributaries.</p> - -<p>The Assyrian withdrew, and Menahem had to exact -this vast sum of money from his miserable subjects. -To tax the poor was hopeless. He found that there -were some sixty thousand persons who might be -reckoned among the wealthier farmers and proprietors,<a name="FNanchor_370_370" id="FNanchor_370_370"></a><a href="#Footnote_370_370" class="fnanchor">[370]</a> -and from them he at once exacted fifty shekels of silver -(more than 3) apiece. Probably they thought that -to pay the sum demanded was not too heavy a price -for the retirement of these frightful Assyrians, whose -forces Tiglath-Pileser did not withdraw until he had -the money in hand. The event took place in 738, and -Tiglath-Pileser continued to reign till 727. How bitterly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_225" id="Page_225">[Pg 225]</a></span> -the burden of foreign tribute was felt appears from -Hos. viii. 9, 10, which should perhaps be rendered, -"They are gone up to Assyria like a wild ass alone -by himself. Ephraim hath hired lovers. And they -begin to be minished by reason of the burden of the -king of princes." "The king of princes" was the -haughty title usurped by Tiglath-Pileser, who said, -"Are not my princes all of them kings?" (Isa. x. 8).</p> - -<p>All this was a fulfilment of what Hosea had foreseen:—</p> - -<p>"Ephraim is oppressed, he is crushed in judgment, -because he was content to walk after vanity. Therefore -am I unto Ephraim as a moth, and to the house of -Judah as rottenness. When Ephraim saw his sickness, -and the house of Judah his wound, then went Ephraim -to Assyria, and sent unto an avenging king:<a name="FNanchor_371_371" id="FNanchor_371_371"></a><a href="#Footnote_371_371" class="fnanchor">[371]</a> yet could -he not heal you, nor cure you of your wound. For I -will be unto Ephraim as a lion, and as a young lion -to the House of Judah: I, even I, will tear and go -away; I will take away, and none shall rescue him." -The Assyrian was irresistible, because he was the -destined instrument of the wrath of God. The -"mixing with the heathens" was a sin, and Israel in -cooing to Assyria was like a foolish dove; but the day -sometimes comes to doomed nations when no course -can save them from the fate which they have provoked.<a name="FNanchor_372_372" id="FNanchor_372_372"></a><a href="#Footnote_372_372" class="fnanchor">[372]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_226" id="Page_226">[Pg 226]</a></span></p> - -<p>Not long afterwards Menahem died, and he had -sufficiently established his rule to be succeeded as a -matter of course by his son Pekahiah. But</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Revenge and wrong bring forth their kind;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">The foul cubs like their parents are."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>Samaria had fearful object-lessons in the apparently -immediate success of murder and rebellion. The prize -looked near and splendid: the vengeance might be -belated or might not come. Of Pekahiah we are told -absolutely nothing but that he reigned two years, with -this stereotyped addition, that "he did that which was -evil in the sight of Jehovah" by continuing the calf-worship.<a name="FNanchor_373_373" id="FNanchor_373_373"></a><a href="#Footnote_373_373" class="fnanchor">[373]</a> -After this brief and uneventful reign, his -captain Pekah got together fifty fierce Gileadites, and -with the aid of two otherwise unknown friends, Argob -and Arieh, murdered Pekahiah in his own harem.<a name="FNanchor_374_374" id="FNanchor_374_374"></a><a href="#Footnote_374_374" class="fnanchor">[374]</a> -Argob was probably so named from the district in -Bashan, and Arieh was a fit name for a lion-faced -Gadite (1 Chron. xii. 8).</p> - -<p>The sacred historian troubles himself but little about -these kings. His annals of them are brief to extreme -meagreness. Like the prophet, he viewed them as -God-abandoned phantoms of guilty royalty.</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"They that cry unto me, My God, we, Israel, know thee.<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Israel hath cast off that which is good:<br /></span> -<span class="i1">The enemy shall pursue him.<br /></span> -<span class="i1">They have set up kings, but not by Me;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">They have removed them, and I knew it not:<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Of their silver and their gold have they made them idols,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">That they may be cut off.<br /></span> -<span class="i1">He hath cast on thy calf, O Samaria."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_227" id="Page_227">[Pg 227]</a></span></p> - -<p>Probably Pekahiah was, as so often happens, the -weak son of a vigorous father. The times could not -tolerate incapable sovereigns; and the fact that Pekah -not only maintained himself on the throne for twenty -years,<a name="FNanchor_375_375" id="FNanchor_375_375"></a><a href="#Footnote_375_375" class="fnanchor">[375]</a> but was able to take active steps of aggression -against Jerusalem, seems to show that he was a man -of some administrative capacity. If he had not achieved -political and military importance, it would hardly have -been worth while for a fierce and powerful king like -Rezin, the last king of Syria, to form so close an -alliance with him. Probably Rezin saw that his throne -and his very existence were in danger, and Pekah -wished with Rezin's aid to resist to the uttermost the -encroachments of Assyria, and escape the burdensome -tribute which Menahem had paid. Indeed, it may well -be that Pekahiah's passive continuance of this tribute -may have been distasteful to the people of the land, -and that they condoned or even tacitly aided Pekah's -rebellion in order to get rid of it, and to find protection -in an abler monarch. It was the last, perhaps the -only, chance for the kings of Syria and of Israel. As -we hear no more of Hamath as a member of the -alliance, we must suppose that it had now been -reduced to impotence and vassalage by the all-powerful -Assyrian. If, however, there was to be any overbalance<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_228" id="Page_228">[Pg 228]</a></span> -to the colossal menace of Nineveh, it could -only be by a large confederacy; and it may have been -the refusal of Jotham to join that confederacy, on the -death of his father Uzziah, which caused the joint -invasion of Rezin and Pekah to force him to accept -their alliance or to suppress him altogether. In that -case they might have formed a close alliance with -Egypt, and the forces of the united South might, they -fancied, prove to be a match for the forces of the -North.<a name="FNanchor_376_376" id="FNanchor_376_376"></a><a href="#Footnote_376_376" class="fnanchor">[376]</a></p> - -<p>Whatever designs they may have formed against -Jotham, or to whatever extent they may have annoyed -him, it was not till the reign of his son Ahaz that they -became formidable and ruinous. Of this we shall say -more in recounting the reign of Ahaz. All that we -need now remark is that their bold aggression on -Judah became the cause of utter destruction to them -both. They advanced against Ahaz, and overran his -helpless country. It was their object to depose the -descendant of David, and to crown in his place a certain -unnamed "son of <i>Tabeal</i>," whom Ewald supposed to -have been a Syrian, but whose name may possibly -furnish a specimen of the later Jewish device of -Gematria.<a name="FNanchor_377_377" id="FNanchor_377_377"></a><a href="#Footnote_377_377" class="fnanchor">[377]</a></p> - -<p>It is not impossible that behind these events we may -find the efforts and yearnings of a party which cared -more for Israel's unity than for David's throne. Such -a party may easily have sprung up during the splendid, -prosperous reign of Jeroboam II. It has been conjectured -by some that the election of Uzziah by the -people—delayed, according to one reckoning, for twelve -years—was in reality the triumph of the party which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_229" id="Page_229">[Pg 229]</a></span> -felt an unquenchable allegiance to David's house. In -Deut. xxxiii. Reuben is put before Judah; Jeshurun -(<i>i.e.</i>, Israel) is magnified far more than Judah; and -some Northern shrine in Zebulon, as well as the Temple, -is celebrated as a sanctuary.<a name="FNanchor_378_378" id="FNanchor_378_378"></a><a href="#Footnote_378_378" class="fnanchor">[378]</a> That there were men in -Jerusalem who preferred Rezin and Pekahiah to their -own king is clearly stated in Isaiah. He compares -them to those who prefer a turbid torrent to a soft, -sweet stream. "Because," he says, "this people -despise the waters of Shiloah that flow softly, and -take delight in Rezin and Remaliah's son; now, therefore, -the Lord bringeth upon them the waters of the -river, strong and many, even the King of Assyria, and -all his glory."<a name="FNanchor_379_379" id="FNanchor_379_379"></a><a href="#Footnote_379_379" class="fnanchor">[379]</a> Isaiah seems to have had a contempt -for the whole attack. He told Ahaz not to fear for the -stumps of those two smoking firebrands Rezin, King -of Syria, and the Israelitish usurper, whom he only -condescends to call "Remaliah's son." He promises -the trembling Ahaz that, since he had faithlessly -<i>refused</i> a sign, God would give him a sign. The sign -was that the young woman who accompanied Isaiah—perhaps -his youthful wife—should bear a son, whose -name should be called Immanuel; and that before the -child Immanuel—whose designation, "God with us," -was an omen of the loftiest hope—should be of an age -to distinguish evil from good, the Northern land, which -Ahaz abhorred, should be forsaken of both her kings.</p> - -<p>The prophecy came true in every particular. Rezin -and Pekah swept all before them, and besieged -Jerusalem; but they wasted their time in vain before -the fortifications which Jotham had strengthened and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_230" id="Page_230">[Pg 230]</a></span> -repaired. Obliged to raise the siege, Rezin carried his -army southward, and indemnified himself by seizing -Elath, by driving out the Judan garrison, and replacing -them with Syrians.<a name="FNanchor_380_380" id="FNanchor_380_380"></a><a href="#Footnote_380_380" class="fnanchor">[380]</a> It was the last gleam of -Syrian success, before the final overthrow of Damascus -which prophecy had often and emphatically foretold.</p> - -<p>Pekah also withdrew his forces—no doubt compelled -to do so by the step which Ahaz took in his desperation. -For now the King of Judah invoked the protection -and invited the active interference of Tiglath-Pileser -against his enemies—"to save him out of the -hand of the King of Syria, and out of the hand of -the King of Israel, who were risen up against him."</p> - -<p>Rezin and Damascus first felt the might of the -Assyrian's conquering arm. The account of his decisive -conquest is preserved in the <i>Eponym Canon</i>, -and the passages which refer to the defeat of the -Syrians will be found in the First Appendix at the end -of the volume. It appears from the monuments that -Rezin (Rasannu) lost not only his kingdom, but his -life.</p> - -<p>It is the death-knell of Araman greatness, as -Amos had foretold.</p> - -<p> -"Thus saith Jehovah:<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I will not turn away the punishment thereof;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Because they have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron:</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">But I will send a fire into the house of Hazael,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Which shall devour the palaces of Benhadad.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And I will break the bar of Damascus,<a name="FNanchor_381_381" id="FNanchor_381_381"></a><a href="#Footnote_381_381" class="fnanchor">[381]</a></span><br /> -<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_231" id="Page_231">[Pg 231]</a></span><span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And cut off him that sitteth [on the throne] in the Valley of Aven,<a name="FNanchor_382_382" id="FNanchor_382_382"></a><a href="#Footnote_382_382" class="fnanchor">[382]</a></span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And him that holdeth the sceptre from Beth-Eden:<a name="FNanchor_383_383" id="FNanchor_383_383"></a><a href="#Footnote_383_383" class="fnanchor">[383]</a></span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And the people of Syria shall go into captivity unto Kir,<a name="FNanchor_384_384" id="FNanchor_384_384"></a><a href="#Footnote_384_384" class="fnanchor">[384]</a></span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Saith Jehovah."</span><br /> -</p> - -<p>Rezin was slain—how we know not; very probably -by one of the horrible methods of torture—by being -flayed alive, or decapitated, or having his lips and nose -cut off—which were practised by these demon-kings -of Nineveh.</p> - -<p>Nor did Pekah escape. Tiglath-Pileser advanced -against the northern part of his dominions, and afflicted -the land of Zebulon and Naphtali. Ijon; Abel-beth-Maachah, -the city of Elisha; Zanoah, the ancient -sanctuary of Kedesh-Naphtali, the home of the hero -Barak; Hazor, the former capital of the Canaanitish -king Jabin; Gilead; Galilee,—all submitted to him, -apparently without striking a serious blow. He dealt -with the miserable inhabitants in the way familiar to -kings of Assyria. He deported them <i>en masse</i> into a -strange country of which they did not understand the -language, and in which they were reduced to hopeless -subjection, while he supplied their places by aliens -from various parts of his own dominions. There could -be no securer method of reducing to paralysis all their -national aspirations. Strangers in a strange land, -they forgot their nationality, forgot their religion, forgot -their language, forgot their traditions. Their sole -resource was to plunge into material pursuits, and to -melt away into indistinguishable obliteration among<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_232" id="Page_232">[Pg 232]</a></span> -the neighbouring heathen. It was the beginning of -the Northern Captivity—of the loss of the Ten Tribes.</p> - -<p>As Tiglath-Pileser thus permanently subdued and -depopulated the land of the Northern Tribes, it is a -Jewish tradition that at this time he carried away the -golden "calf" from Dan among his spoils.<a name="FNanchor_385_385" id="FNanchor_385_385"></a><a href="#Footnote_385_385" class="fnanchor">[385]</a> Scripture -does not record the fact, though in Hosea (viii. 5) there -may be an allusion to the fate of that at Bethel, whether -the right version be "He hath cast off thy calf, O -Samaria," or "Thy calf, O Samaria, hath cast thee -off."<a name="FNanchor_386_386" id="FNanchor_386_386"></a><a href="#Footnote_386_386" class="fnanchor">[386]</a> "The workman made it," he continues; "therefore -it is not God: for the calf of Samaria shall be -broken in pieces." And again (x. 5): "The people of -Samaria shall fear because of the heifer of the House of -Vanity: for the people thereof shall mourn over it, and -the <i>chemarim</i> [<i>i.e.</i>, the black-robed false priests thereof] -shall tremble for it, for the glory thereof, because it is -departed. It [the idol] shall also be carried to Assyria -for a present to King Combat."</p> - -<p>For a time Pekah escaped; but unsuccess is fatal to -a murderous usurper, weakened by the loss and plunder -of dominions which he is unable to defend. Instead of -wasting time in the siege of a strong city like Samaria, -Tiglath-Pileser in all probability stirred up Hoshea, the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_233" id="Page_233">[Pg 233]</a></span> -son of Elah, to rise in conspiracy against his master and -slay him. For Pekah and Israel seem to have made -light of the Northern raid. They said in their pride -and stoutness of heart, "The bricks are fallen down, -but we will build with new stones: the sycomores are -cut down, but we will change them into cedars." Such -pretence of security was ill-timed and senseless, and -Isaiah denounced it. "Therefore," he said, "Jehovah -hath set up against Israel the adversaries of Rezin [<i>i.e.</i>, -the Assyrians], and hath stirred up his enemies; the -Syrians on the east, and the Philistines on the west; -and they have devoured Israel with open mouth. For -all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is -stretched out still. Yet the people have not turned -unto Him that smote them, neither have they sought -the Lord of hosts. Therefore Jehovah hath cut off -from Israel palm-branch and rush in one day. The -elder and the honourable man, he is the head; and the -prophet that speaketh lies, he is the tail. For they that -lead this people cause them to err, and they that are led -of them are swallowed up."<a name="FNanchor_387_387" id="FNanchor_387_387"></a><a href="#Footnote_387_387" class="fnanchor">[387]</a></p> - -<p>The following verses furnish one of the numerous -pictures of the anarchy and abounding misery of these -evil days. "For wickedness burneth as the fire: it -devoureth the briers and thorns; yea, it kindleth in the -thickets of the forest, and they roll upwards in thick -clouds of smoke. Through the wrath of the Lord of -hosts is the land burnt up; the people also are the fuel -of fire: <i>no man spareth his brother</i>. And one shall -snatch on the right, and be hungry; and he shall eat on -the left hand, and they shall not be satisfied: they shall -<i>eat every man the flesh of his own arm</i>: Manasseh,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_234" id="Page_234">[Pg 234]</a></span> -Ephraim; and Ephraim, Manasseh: and they together -shall be against Judah. For all this His anger is not -turned away, but His hand is stretched out still."</p> - -<p>We are told in the Book of Kings that Pekah reigned -for twenty years; but some of these later reigns must be -shortened to suit the exigencies of known chronological -data. It seems probable that he occupied the throne -for a much shorter time.<a name="FNanchor_388_388" id="FNanchor_388_388"></a><a href="#Footnote_388_388" class="fnanchor">[388]</a></p> - -<p>Such was the weakened, harassed, vassal kingdom—the -gaunt spectre of itself—to the throne of which, after -a period of anarchy and chaos, Hoshea, by conspiracy -and murder, succeeded as the miserable feudatory of -Assyria.</p> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_235" id="Page_235">[Pg 235]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXI" id="CHAPTER_XXI">CHAPTER XXI</a></h2> - -<h3><i>HOSHEA, AND THE FALL OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 734-725</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xvii. 1-41</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"As for Samaria, her king is cut off as the foam upon the water."—<span class="smcap">Hos.</span> -x. 7.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>As a matter of convenience, we follow our English -Bible in calling the prophet by the name Ho<i>sea</i>, -and the nineteenth, last, and best king of Israel Ho<i>shea</i>. -The names, however, are identical (הֹושֵׁצַ), and mean -"Salvation"—the name borne by Joshua also in his -earlier days. In the irony of history the name of the -last king of Ephraim was thus identical with that of -her earliest and greatest hero, just as the last of Roman -emperors bore the double name of the Founder of Rome -and the Founder of the Empire—Romulus Augustulus. -By a yet deeper irony of events the king in whose -reign came the final precipitation of ruin wore the -name which signified deliverance from it.</p> - -<p>And more and more, as time went on, the prophet -Hosea felt that he had no word of present hope or -comfort for the king his namesake. It was the more -brilliant lot of Isaiah, in the Southern Kingdom, to -kindle the ardour of a generous courage. Like Tyrtus, -who roused the Spartans to feel their own greatness—like<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_236" id="Page_236">[Pg 236]</a></span> -Demosthenes, who hurled the might of Athens -against Philip of Macedon—like Chatham, "bidding -England be of good cheer, and hurl defiance at her -foes"—like Pitt, pouring forth, in the days of the -Napoleonic terror, "the indomitable language of courage -and of hope,"—Isaiah was missioned to encourage -Judah to despise first the mighty Syrian, and then the -mightier Assyrian. Far different was the lot of Hosea, -who could only be the denouncer of an inevitable -doom. His sad function was like that of Phocion after -Chroneia, of Hannibal after Zama, of Thiers after -Sedan: he had to utter the Cassandra-voices of -prophecy, which his besotted and demented contemporaries—among -whom the priests were the worst of -all<a name="FNanchor_389_389" id="FNanchor_389_389"></a><a href="#Footnote_389_389" class="fnanchor">[389]</a>—despised and flouted until the time for repentance -had gone by for ever.</p> - -<p>True it is that Hosea could not be content—what -true heart could?—to breathe nothing but the language -of reprobation and despair. Israel had been "yoked -to his two transgressions,"<a name="FNanchor_390_390" id="FNanchor_390_390"></a><a href="#Footnote_390_390" class="fnanchor">[390]</a> but Jehovah could not give -up His love for His chosen people:—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i5">"How shall I give thee up, Ephraim?<br /></span> -<span class="i6">How shall I surrender thee, Israel?<br /></span> -<span class="i6">How shall I make thee as Admah?<br /></span> -<span class="i6">How shall I treat thee as Zeboim?<br /></span> -<span class="i6">Mine heart is turned within Me;<br /></span><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_237" id="Page_237">[Pg 237]</a></span> -<span class="i6">I am wholly filled with compassion!<br /></span> -<span class="i6">I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger;<br /></span> -<span class="i6">I will not again destroy Ephraim:<br /></span> -<span class="i6">For I am God, and not man.<br /></span> -<span class="i6">The Holy One in the midst of thee!<br /></span> -<span class="i6">I will not come to exterminate!<br /></span> -<span class="i0">They shall come after Jehovah as after a lion that roars!<br /></span> -<span class="i0">For he shall roar, and his sons shall come hurrying from the west,<br /></span> -<span class="i0">They shall come hurrying as a bird out of Egypt,<br /></span> -<span class="i0">And as a dove out of the land of Assyria;<br /></span> -<span class="i0">And I will cause them to dwell in their houses, Saith Jehovah."<a name="FNanchor_391_391" id="FNanchor_391_391"></a><a href="#Footnote_391_391" class="fnanchor">[391]</a><br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>Alas! the gleam of alleviation was imaginary rather -than actual. The prophet's wish was father to his -thought. He had prophesied that Israel should be -scattered in all lands (ix. 3, 12, 17, xiii. 3-16). This -was true; and it did not prove true, except in some -higher ideal sense, that "Israel shall again dwell in his -own land" (xiv. 4-7) in prosperity and joy.</p> - -<p>The date of Hoshea's accession is uncertain, and we -cannot tell in what sense we are to understand his -reign as having lasted "nine years."<a name="FNanchor_392_392" id="FNanchor_392_392"></a><a href="#Footnote_392_392" class="fnanchor">[392]</a> We have no -grounds for accepting the statement of Josephus (<i>Antt.</i>, -IX. xiii. 1), that Hoshea had been a friend of Pekah -and plotted against him. Tiglath-Pileser expressly -says that he himself slew Pekah and appointed Hoshea.<a name="FNanchor_393_393" id="FNanchor_393_393"></a><a href="#Footnote_393_393" class="fnanchor">[393]</a> -His must have been, at the best, a pitiful and humiliating -reign. He owed his purely vassal sovereignty to -Assyrian patronage. He probably did as well for -Israel as was in his power. Singular to relate, he is -the only one of all the kings of Israel of whom the -historian has a word of commendation; for while we<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_238" id="Page_238">[Pg 238]</a></span> -are told that "he did that which was evil in the sight -of the Lord," it is added that it was "not as the kings -of Israel that were before him." But we do not know -wherein either his evil-doing or his superiority consisted. -The Rabbis guess that he did not replace the -golden calf at Dan which Tiglath-Pileser had taken -away (Hos. x. 6); or that he did not prevent his -subjects from going to Hezekiah's passover.<a name="FNanchor_394_394" id="FNanchor_394_394"></a><a href="#Footnote_394_394" class="fnanchor">[394]</a> "It -seems like a harsh jest," says Ewald, "that this Hoshea, -who was better than all his predecessors, was to be the -last king." But so it has often been in history. The -vengeance of the French Revolution smote the innocent -and harmless Louis XVI. and Marie Antoinette—not -Louis XIV., or Louis XV. and Madame du Pompadour.</p> - -<p>His patron Tiglath-Pileser ended his magnificent -reign of conquest in 727, soon after he had seated -Hoshea on the throne. The removal of his strong -grasp on the helm caused immediate revolt. Phœnicia -especially asserted her independence against Shalmaneser -IV. He seems to have spent five years in an -unavailing attempt to capture Island-Tyre. Meanwhile, -the internal troubles which had harassed and weakened -Egypt ceased, and a strong Ethiopian king named -Sabaco established his rule over the whole country.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_239" id="Page_239">[Pg 239]</a></span><a name="FNanchor_395_395" id="FNanchor_395_395"></a><a href="#Footnote_395_395" class="fnanchor">[395]</a> -It was perhaps the hope that Phœnicia might hold out -against the Assyrian, and that the Egyptian might -protect Samaria, which kindled in the mind of Hoshea -the delusive plan of freeing himself and his impoverished -land from the grinding tribute imposed by Nineveh. -While Shalmaneser<a name="FNanchor_396_396" id="FNanchor_396_396"></a><a href="#Footnote_396_396" class="fnanchor">[396]</a> was trying to quell Tyre, Hoshea, -having received promises of assistance from Sabaco, -withheld the "presents"—the <i>minchah</i>, as the tribute -is euphemistically called—which he had hitherto paid. -Seeing the danger of a powerful coalition, Shalmaneser -swept down on Samaria in 724. Possibly he defeated -the army of Israel in the plain of Jezreel (Hos. i. 5), -and got hold of the person of Hoshea. Josephus says -that he "besieged him"; but the sacred historian only -tells us that "he shut him up, and bound him in -prison." Whether Hoshea was taken in battle, or -betrayed by the Assyrian party in Samaria, or whether -he went in person to see if he could pacify the ruthless -conqueror, he henceforth disappears from history "like -foam"—or like a chip or a bubble—"upon the water." -We do not know whether he was put to death, but -we infer from an allusion in Micah that he was subjected -to the cruel indignities in which the Assyrians delighted; -for the prophet says, "They shall smite the Judge of -Israel with a rod upon the cheek."<a name="FNanchor_397_397" id="FNanchor_397_397"></a><a href="#Footnote_397_397" class="fnanchor">[397]</a> Perhaps in the -title "Judge" (Shophet, <i>suffes</i>) we may see a sign that -Hoshea's royalty was little more than the shadow of a -name.</p> - -<p>Having thus got rid of the king, Shalmaneser proceeded -to invest the capital. But Samaria was strongly -fortified upon its hill, and the Jewish race has again<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_240" id="Page_240">[Pg 240]</a></span> -and again shown—as it showed so conspicuously in the -final crisis of its destiny, when Jerusalem defied the -terrible armies of Rome—that with walls to protect -them they could pluck up a terrible courage and -endurance from despair. Strong as Assyria was, the -capital of Ephraim for three years resisted her beleaguering -host and her crashing battering-rams. About -all the anguish which prevailed within the city, and the -wild vicissitudes of orgy and starvation, history is silent. -But prophecy tells us that the sorrows of a travailing -woman came upon the now kingless city. They -drank to the dregs the cup of fury.<a name="FNanchor_398_398" id="FNanchor_398_398"></a><a href="#Footnote_398_398" class="fnanchor">[398]</a> The saddest -Northern prophet, "the Jeremiah of Israel," sings the -dirge of Israel's saddest king.<a name="FNanchor_399_399" id="FNanchor_399_399"></a><a href="#Footnote_399_399" class="fnanchor">[399]</a></p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i6">"I am become to them as a lion;<br /></span> -<span class="i7">As a leopard will I watch by the way;<br /></span> -<span class="i7">I will meet them as a bear bereaved of her whelps,<br /></span> -<span class="i7">And rend the caul of their heart,<br /></span> -<span class="i7">And there will I devour them like a lioness:<br /></span> -<span class="i7">The beast of the field shall tear them....<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Where now is thy king, that he may save thee in all thy cities<br /></span> -<span class="i0">And thy judges, of whom thou saidst, 'Give me a king and prince'?<br /></span> -<span class="i7">I give thee a king in Mine anger,<br /></span> -<span class="i7">And take him away in My wrath."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>For three years Samaria held out. During the siege -Shalmaneser died, and was succeeded by Sargon, who—though -he vaguely talks of "the kings his ancestors," -and says that he had been preceded by three hundred -and thirty Assyrian dynasts—never names his father, -and seems to have been a usurping general.<a name="FNanchor_400_400" id="FNanchor_400_400"></a><a href="#Footnote_400_400" class="fnanchor">[400]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_241" id="Page_241">[Pg 241]</a></span></p> - -<p>Sabaco remained inactive, and basely deserted the -miserable people which had relied on his protection. In -this conduct Egypt was true to its historic character of -untrustworthiness and inertness. Both in Israel and -in Judah there were two political parties. One relied -on the strength of Egypt; the other counselled submission -to Assyria, or—in the hour when it became -necessary to defy Assyria—confidence in God. Egypt -was as frail a support as one of her own paper-reeds, -which bent under the weight, and broke and ran into -the hand of every one who leaned on it.</p> - -<p>Sargon did not raze the city, and we see from the -<i>Eponym Canon</i> that its inhabitants were still strong -enough some years later to take part in a futile revolt. -But we have one dreadful glimpse of the horrors which -he inflicted upon it. They were the inevitable punishment<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_242" id="Page_242">[Pg 242]</a></span> -of every conquered city which had dared to resist -the Assyrian arm.</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Samaria shall bear her guilt,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">For she hath rebelled against her God.<br /></span> -<span class="i1">They shall fall by the sword:<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Their infants shall be dashed in pieces,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">And their women in child shall be ripped up."<a name="FNanchor_401_401" id="FNanchor_401_401"></a><a href="#Footnote_401_401" class="fnanchor">[401]</a><br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>Sargon's own record of the matter on the tablets at -Khorsabad is: "I besieged, took, and occupied the city -of Samaria, and carried into captivity twenty-seven -thousand two hundred and eighty of its inhabitants. -I changed the former government of this country, and -placed over it lieutenants of my own. And Sebeh, -Sultan of Egypt, came to Raphia to fight against me. -They met me, and I routed them. Sebeh fled."<a name="FNanchor_402_402" id="FNanchor_402_402"></a><a href="#Footnote_402_402" class="fnanchor">[402]</a> The -Assyrians were occupied in the unsuccessful siege of -Tyre between 720-715, during which years Sargon put -down Yahubid of Hamath, whose revolt had been aided -by Damascus and Samaria. In 710 he marched against -Ashdod (Isa. xx. 1). In 709 he defeated Merodach-Baladan -at Dur-Yakin, and reconquered Chalda, -deporting some of the population into Samaria. In -704, in the fifteenth year of his reign, he was assassinated, -after a career of victory. He inscribes on his -palace at Khorsabad a prayer to his god Assur, that, -after his toils and conquests, "I may be preserved for -the long years of a long life, for the happiness of my -body, for the satisfaction of my heart. May I accumulate -in this palace immense treasures, the booties of -all countries, the products of mountains and valleys." -Assur and the gods of Chalda were invoked in vain;<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_243" id="Page_243">[Pg 243]</a></span> -the prayer was scattered to the winds, and the murderer's -dagger was the comment on Sargon's happy anticipations -of peace and splendour.</p> - -<p>Israel fell unpitied by her southern neighbour, for -Judah was still smarting under memories of the old -contempt and injury of Joash ben-Jehoahaz, and the -more recent wrongs inflicted by Pekah and Rezin. -Isaiah exults over the fate of Samaria, while he points -the moral of her fall to the drunken priests and prophets -of Jerusalem. "Woe," he says, "to the crown of -pride of the drunkards of Ephraim, and to the fading -flower of his glorious beauty, which is on the head of -the fat valley of them that are smitten down with wine! -Behold, the Lord hath a mighty and strong one [<i>i.e.</i>, the -Assyrian]; as a tempest of hail, a destroying storm, -as a tempest of mighty water overflowing, shall he cast -down to the earth with violence. The crown of pride, -the drunkards of Ephraim, shall be trodden underfoot: -and the fading flower of his glorious beauty, which -is on the head of the fat valley, shall be as the first -ripe fig before the summer; which when he that -looketh upon it seeth, while it is yet in his hand he -eateth it up."<a name="FNanchor_403_403" id="FNanchor_403_403"></a><a href="#Footnote_403_403" class="fnanchor">[403]</a> Israel had begun in hostility to Judah, -and perished by it at last.</p> - -<p>Such, then, was the end of the once brilliant kingdom -of Israel—the kingdom which, even so late as the reign -of Jeroboam II., seemed to have a great future before -it. No one could have foreseen beforehand that, when, -with the prophetic encouragement of Ahijah, Jeroboam I. -established his sovereignty over the greater, richer, -and more flourishing part of the land assigned to the -sons of Jacob, the new kingdom should fall into utter -ruin and destruction after only two and a half centuries<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_244" id="Page_244">[Pg 244]</a></span> -of existence, and its tribes melt away amid the surrounding -nations, and sink into a mixed and semi-heathen -race without any further nationality or distinctive -history. It seemed far less probable that the mere -fragment of the Southern Kingdom, after retaining its -separate existence for more than one hundred and sixty -years longer than its more powerful brother, should -continue to endure as a nation till the end of time. -Such was the design of God's providence, and we -know no more. The Northern Kingdom had, up to -this time, produced the greatest and most numerous -prophets—Ahijah, Elijah, Elisha, Micaiah, Jonah, -Amos, Hosea, Nahum, and many more.<a name="FNanchor_404_404" id="FNanchor_404_404"></a><a href="#Footnote_404_404" class="fnanchor">[404]</a> It had also -produced the loveliest and most enduring poetry in -the Song of Songs, the Song of Deborah, and other -contributions to the Books of Jashar, and of the Wars -of Jehovah. It had also brought into vigour the -earliest and best historic literature, the narratives of -the Elohist and the Jehovist. These immortal legacies -of the religious spirit of the Northern Kingdom were -incomparably superior in moral and enduring value to -the Levitic jejuneness of the Priestly Code, with its -hierarchic interests and ineffectual rules, which, in the -exaggerated supremacy attached to rites, proved to be -the final blight of an unspiritual Judaism. Israel had -also been superior in prowess and in deeds of war, -and in the days of Joash ben-Jehoahaz ben-Jehu had -barely conceded to Judah a right to separate existence. -More than all this, the apostasies of Judah, from the -days of Solomon downwards, were quite as heinous as -Jezebel's Baal-worship, and far more deadly than the -irregular but not at first idolatrous cultus of Bethel.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_245" id="Page_245">[Pg 245]</a></span> -The prophets are careful to teach Judah that if she was -spared it was not because of any good deservings.<a name="FNanchor_405_405" id="FNanchor_405_405"></a><a href="#Footnote_405_405" class="fnanchor">[405]</a> Yet -now the cedar was scathed and smitten down, and its -boughs were rent and scattered; and the thistle had -escaped the wild beast's tread!</p> - -<p>In the former volume we glanced at some of the -causes of this, and the blessings which resulted from -it. The central and chiefest blessing was, first, the -preservation of a purer form of monotheism, and a -loftier ideal of religion—though only realised by a few -in Judah—than had ever prevailed in the Northern -Tribes; secondly, and above all, the development of that -inspiring Messianic prophecy which was to be fulfilled -seven centuries later, when He who was David's Son -and David's Lord came to our lost race from the bosom -of the Father, and brought life and immortality to -light.</p> - -<p>And it was the work purely of "God's unseen -providence, by men nicknamed 'Chance,'" which, dealing -with nations as the potter with his clay, chooses some -to honour and some to dishonour. For, as all the -prophets are anxious to remind the Judan Kingdom, -their success, the procrastination of their downfall, -their restoration from captivity, were not due to any -merits of their own. The Jews were and ever had been -a stiff-necked nation; and though some of their kings -had been faithful servants of Jehovah, yet many of them—like -Rehoboam, and Ahaz, and Manasseh—exceeded -in wickedness and inexcusable apostasy the least -faithful of the worshippers at Gilgal and Bethel. They -were plainly reminded of their nothingness: "And -thou shalt speak and say before the Lord thy God,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_246" id="Page_246">[Pg 246]</a></span> -A Syrian ready to perish was my father, and he went -down into Egypt, and sojourned there with a few, and -became there a nation."<a name="FNanchor_406_406" id="FNanchor_406_406"></a><a href="#Footnote_406_406" class="fnanchor">[406]</a> "Fear not, thou worm Jacob: -I will help thee."<a name="FNanchor_407_407" id="FNanchor_407_407"></a><a href="#Footnote_407_407" class="fnanchor">[407]</a></p> - -<p>But this was the end of the Ten Tribes. Nor must -we say that Hosea's prediction of mercy was laughed -to scorn by the irony of events, when he had given it -as God's promise that—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">I will not again destroy Israel;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">For I am God, and not man."<a name="FNanchor_408_408" id="FNanchor_408_408"></a><a href="#Footnote_408_408" class="fnanchor">[408]</a><br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>The words mean that mercy is God's chiefest and -most essential attribute; and, after all, a nation is -composed of families and individuals, and in political -extinction there may have been many families and -individuals in Israel, like that of Tobias, and like that -of Anna, the prophetess of the tribe of Asher, who -found, either in their far exile, or among the scattered -Jews who still peopled the old territories, a peace which -was impossible during the distracted anarchy and -deepening corruption of the whole period which had -elapsed since the founding of the house of Omri. In -any case God knows and loves His own. The words,</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">For I am God, and not man,"<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>might stand for an epitome of much that is most -precious in Holy Writ. God's orthodoxy is the truth; -and the truth remaineth, though man's orthodoxy exercises -all its fury and all its baseness to overwhelm it. -What hope has any man, even a St. Paul—what -hope had even the Lord Himself—before the harsh,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_247" id="Page_247">[Pg 247]</a></span> -self-interested tribunals of human judgment, or of that -purely external religionism which has always shown -itself more brutal and more blundering than secular -cruelty? What chance has there been, humanly speaking, -for God's best saints, prophets, and reformers, when -priests, popes, or inquisitors have been their judges? -If God resembled those generations of unresisted ecclesiastics, -whose chief resort has been the syllogism of -violence, and whose main arguments have been the -torture-chamber and the stake, what hope could there -possibly be for the vast majority of mankind but those -endless torments by the terrors of which corrupt -Churches have forced their tyranny upon the crushed -liberties and the paralysed conscience of mankind? -The Indian sage was right who said that "God can -only be truly described by the words No! No!"—that -is, by repudiating multitudes of the ignoble and -cruel basenesses which religious teachers have imagined -or invented respecting Him. Because God is God, and -not man—God, not a tyrant or an inquisitor—God, -with the great compassionate heart of unfathomable -tenderness,—therefore, in all who truly love Him, -perfect love casteth out fear, because fear hath torment. -Sin means ruin; yet God is love.<a name="FNanchor_409_409" id="FNanchor_409_409"></a><a href="#Footnote_409_409" class="fnanchor">[409]</a></p> - -<hr class="tb" /> - -<p>The historian of the Kings here digresses, in a manner -unusual to the Old Testament, to give us a most interesting -glimpse of the fate of the conquered people, -and the origin of the race which was known to after-ages -by the name "Samaritan."</p> - -<p>Sargon, when he had sacked the capital, carried out -the policy of deportation which had now been established<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_248" id="Page_248">[Pg 248]</a></span> -by the Assyrian kings. He achieved the double -purpose of populating the capital and province of -Nineveh, while he reduced subject nations to inanition, -by sweeping away all the chief of the inhabitants from -conquered states, and settling them in his own more -immediate dominions. There they would be reduced -to impotence, and mingle with the races among whom -their lot would henceforth be cast. He therefore -"carried Israel away" into Assyria, and placed them -in Halah, north of Thapsacus, on the Euphrates, and -in Habor, the river of Gozan<a name="FNanchor_410_410" id="FNanchor_410_410"></a><a href="#Footnote_410_410" class="fnanchor">[410]</a>—<i>i.e.</i>, on the river -in Northern Assyria which still bears the name of -Khabour, and flows into the Euphrates—and in the -cities of the Medes.<a name="FNanchor_411_411" id="FNanchor_411_411"></a><a href="#Footnote_411_411" class="fnanchor">[411]</a> He replaced the old population -by Dinaites, Tarplites, Apharsathchites, Susanchites, -Elamites, Dehavites, and Babylonians, after carrying -away the great bulk of the better-class population.<a name="FNanchor_412_412" id="FNanchor_412_412"></a><a href="#Footnote_412_412" class="fnanchor">[412]</a></p> - -<p>After this the historian pauses to sum up and -emphasise once more the main lesson of his narrative. -It is that "righteousness exalteth a nation, and sin -is the reproach of any people." God had called His -son Israel out of Egypt, delivered His chosen from -Pharaoh, given them a pleasant land; but "Israel had -sinned against Jehovah their God, and had feared -other gods, and walked in the statutes of the heathen." -They had failed therefore in fulfilling the very purpose<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_249" id="Page_249">[Pg 249]</a></span> -for which they had been set apart. They had been -intended "to uplift among the nations the banner of -righteousness" and the banner of the One True God. -Instead of this, they were seduced by the heathen -ritual of</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Gay religions full of pomp and gold."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>They decked out alien institutions,<a name="FNanchor_413_413" id="FNanchor_413_413"></a><a href="#Footnote_413_413" class="fnanchor">[413]</a> and alike in frequented -and populous places—"from the tower of the -watchmen to the fenced city"—set up <i>matstseboth</i> -(A.V., "pillars") and <i>Asherim</i> on every high hill. The -green trees became <i>obumbratrices scelerum</i>, the secret -bowers of their iniquities. They burnt incense on the -<i>bamoth</i>, and served idols, and wrought wickedness. -Useless had been the voices of all the prophets and the -seers. They went after vain things, and became vain. -Beginning with the two "calves," they proceeded -to lewd and orgiastic idolatries. Ahab and Jezebel -seduced them into Tyrian Baal-worship. From the -Assyrians they learnt and practised the adoration of -the host of heaven.<a name="FNanchor_414_414" id="FNanchor_414_414"></a><a href="#Footnote_414_414" class="fnanchor">[414]</a> From Moab and Ammon they -borrowed the abominable rites of Moloch, and used -divination and enchantments by means of belomancy -(Ezek. xxi. 21, 22) and necromancy, and sold themselves -to do wickedness.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_250" id="Page_250">[Pg 250]</a></span></p> - -<p>Nor was this all. These idolatries, with their guilty -ritualism, were not confined to Israel, but also</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Infected Zion's daughters with like heat,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Whose wanton passions in the sacred porch<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Ezekiel saw, when, by the vision led,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">His eye surveyed the dark idolatries<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Of alienated Judah."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>And thus, when Jehovah afflicted the seed of Israel -and cast them out of His sight, Judah also had to feel -the stroke of retribution.<a name="FNanchor_415_415" id="FNanchor_415_415"></a><a href="#Footnote_415_415" class="fnanchor">[415]</a></p> - -<p>And it is idle to object that even if Israel had been -faithful she must have inevitably perished before the -superior might of Damascus, or Nineveh, or Babylon. -How can we tell? It is not possible for us thus to -write unwritten history, and there is absolutely nothing -to show that the surmise is correct. In the days of -David, of Uzziah, of Jeroboam II., Judah and Israel -had shown what they could achieve. Had they been -strong in faithfulness to Jehovah, and in the righteousness -which that faith required, they would have shown -an invincible strength amid the moral enervation of -the surrounding people. They might have held their -own by welding into one strong kingdom the whole of -Palestine, including Philistia, Phœnicia, the Negeb, and -the Trans-Jordanic region. They might have consolidated -the sway which they at various times attained -southwards, as far as the Red Sea port of Elath; -northwards over Aram and Damascus, as far as the -Hamath on the Orontes; eastwards to Thapsacus on -the Euphrates; westward to the Isles of the Gentiles.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_251" id="Page_251">[Pg 251]</a></span> -There is nothing improbable, still less impossible, in the -view that, if the Israelites had truly served Jehovah and -obeyed His laws, they might then have permanently -established the monarchy which was ideally regarded -as their inheritance, and which for brief and fitful -periods they partially maintained. And such a monarchy, -held together by warrior statesmen, strong and -righteous, and above all secure in the blessing of God, -would have been a thoroughly adequate counterpoise, -not only to dilatory and distracted Egypt, which had -long ceased to be aggressive, but even to brutal -Assyria, which prevailed in no small measure because -of the isolation and mutual dissension of these southern -principalities.</p> - -<p>But, as it was, "Assyria and Egypt—the two world-powers -in the dawn of history, the two chief sources -of ancient civilisation, the twin giant-empires which -bounded the Israelite people on the right hand and on -the left—were cruel neighbours, between whom the ill-fated -nation was tossed to and fro in wanton sport like -a shuttlecock. They were cruel friends before whom -it must cringe in turns, praying sometimes for help, -suing sometimes for very life—alternate scourges in -the hand of the Divine wrath. Now it is the fly of -Egypt, and now it is the bee of Assyria, whose -ruthless swarms issue forth at the word of Jehovah, -settling in the holes of the rocks, and upon all thorns, -and upon all bushes, with deadly sting, fatal to man -and beast, devastating the land far and wide. Holding -the poor Israelite in their relentless embrace, they -threatened ever and again to crush him by their grip. -Like the fabled rocks which frowned over the narrow -straits of the Bosporus, they would crash together -and annihilate the helpless craft which the storms of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_252" id="Page_252">[Pg 252]</a></span> -destiny had placed at their mercy. Israel reeled under -their successive blows. As was the beginning, so was -the end. As the captivity of Egypt had been the -cradle of the nation, so was the captivity of Assyria -to be its tomb."<a name="FNanchor_416_416" id="FNanchor_416_416"></a><a href="#Footnote_416_416" class="fnanchor">[416]</a></p> - -<p>In any case the principle of the historian remains -unshaken. Sin is weakness; idolatry is folly and -rebellion; uncleanness is decrepitude. St. Paul was -not thinking of this ancient Philosophy of History -when he wrote his Epistle to the Romans; yet the -intense and masterly sketch which he gives of that -moral corruption which brought about the long, slow, -agonising dissolution of the beauty that was Greece, -and the grandeur that was Rome, is one of its strongest -justifications. His view only differs from the summary -before us in the power of its eloquence and the -profoundness of its psychologic insight. He says the -same thing as the historian of the Kings, only in words -of greater power and wider reach, when he writes: -"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against -all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold -down the truth in unrighteousness. Knowing God, -they glorified Him not as God, neither gave thanks; -but became vain in their reasonings" (ἐματαιώθησαν, -the very word used in the LXX. in 2 Kings xvii. 15), -"and their senseless heart was darkened. Professing -themselves to be wise, they became fools" (words -which might describe the expediency-policy of Jeroboam -I., and its fatal consequences), "and changed -the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of -an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four-footed -beasts, and creeping things. For this cause -God gave them up to passions of dishonour, and unto<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_253" id="Page_253">[Pg 253]</a></span> -a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not -fitting, being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, -covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, strife, -deceit, malignity,"—and so on, through a long catalogue -of iniquities which are identical with those which we -find so burningly denounced on the pages of the -prophets of Israel and Judah.</p> - -<p>Even a Machiavelli, cool and cynical and audacious -as was his scepticism, could see and admit that -faithfulness to religion is the secret of the happiness -and prosperity of states.<a name="FNanchor_417_417" id="FNanchor_417_417"></a><a href="#Footnote_417_417" class="fnanchor">[417]</a> An irreligious society tends -inevitably and always to be a dissolute society; and a -"dissolute society is the most tragic spectacle which -history has ever to present—a nest of disease, of -jealousy, of dissensions, of ruin, and despair, whose -last hope is to be washed off the world and disappear. -Such societies must die sooner or later of their own -gangrene, of their own corruption, because the infection -of evil, spreading into unbounded selfishness, ever -intensifying and reproducing passions which defeat -their own aim, can never end in anything but moral -dissolution." We need not look further than the -collapse of France after the battle of Sedan, and the -cause to which that collapse was attributed, not only -by Christians, but by her own most worldly and -sceptical writers, to see that the same causes ever -issue and will issue in the same ruinous effects.</p> - -<hr class="tb" /> - -<p>In order to complete the history of the Northern -Kingdom, the historian here anticipates the order of time<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_254" id="Page_254">[Pg 254]</a></span> -by telling us what happened to the mongrel population -whom Sargon transplanted into central Ephraim in place -of the old inhabitants.</p> - -<p>The king, we are told, brought them from Babylon—which -was at this time under the rule of Assyria; -from Cuthah—by which seems to be meant some part -of Mesopotamia near Babylon;<a name="FNanchor_418_418" id="FNanchor_418_418"></a><a href="#Footnote_418_418" class="fnanchor">[418]</a> from Avva, or Ivah—probably -the same as Ahavah or Hit, on the Euphrates, -north-west of Babylon; from Sepharvaim, or Sippara, -also on the Euphrates;<a name="FNanchor_419_419" id="FNanchor_419_419"></a><a href="#Footnote_419_419" class="fnanchor">[419]</a> and from Hamath, on the Orontes, -which had not long remained under Jeroboam II.<a name="FNanchor_420_420" id="FNanchor_420_420"></a><a href="#Footnote_420_420" class="fnanchor">[420]</a> -It must not be supposed that the whole population -of Ephraim was deported; that was a physical impossibility. -Although we are told in Assyrian annals -that Sargon carried away with him so vast a number -of captives, it is, of course, clear that the lowest and -poorest part of the population was left.<a name="FNanchor_421_421" id="FNanchor_421_421"></a><a href="#Footnote_421_421" class="fnanchor">[421]</a> We can -imagine the wild confusion which arose when they -found themselves compelled to share the dismantled -palaces and abandoned estates of the wealthy with -the horde of new colonists, whose language, in all -probability, they but imperfectly understood. There -must have been many a tumult, many a scene of horror, -such as took place in the long antagonism of Normans<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_255" id="Page_255">[Pg 255]</a></span> -and Saxons in England, before the immigrants and the -relics of the former populace settled down to amalgamation -and mutual tolerance.</p> - -<p>Sargon is said to have carried away with him the -golden calf or calves of Bethel, as Tiglath-Pileser is -said by the Rabbis to have carried away that of Dan.<a name="FNanchor_422_422" id="FNanchor_422_422"></a><a href="#Footnote_422_422" class="fnanchor">[422]</a> -He also took away with him all the educated classes, -and all the teachers of religion.<a name="FNanchor_423_423" id="FNanchor_423_423"></a><a href="#Footnote_423_423" class="fnanchor">[423]</a> No one was left to -instruct the ignorant inhabitants; and, as Hosea had -prophesied, there was neither a sacrifice, nor a pillar, -nor an ephod, and not even teraphim to which they -could resort.<a name="FNanchor_424_424" id="FNanchor_424_424"></a><a href="#Footnote_424_424" class="fnanchor">[424]</a> Naturally enough, the disunited dregs of -an old and of a new population had no clear knowledge -of religion. They "feared not Jehovah." The sparseness -of inhabitants, with its consequent neglect of -agriculture, caused the increase of wild beasts among -them. There had always been lions and bears in "the -swellings of Jordan,"<a name="FNanchor_425_425" id="FNanchor_425_425"></a><a href="#Footnote_425_425" class="fnanchor">[425]</a> and in all the lonelier parts of -the land; and to this day there are leopards in the -woods of Carmel, and hynas and jackals in many -regions. Conscious of their miserable and godless -condition, and afflicted by the lions, which they regarded -as a sign of Jehovah's anger, the Ephraimites -sent a message to the King of Assyria. They only -claimed Jehovah as their local god, and complained -that the new colonists had provoked the wrath of "the -God of the land" by not knowing His "manner"—that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_256" id="Page_256">[Pg 256]</a></span> -is, the way in which He should be worshipped. The -consequence was that they were in danger of being -exterminated by lions. The kings of Assyria were -devoted worshippers of Assur and Merodach, but they -held the common belief of ancient polytheists that each -country had its own potent divinities. Sargon, therefore, -gave orders that one of the priests of his captivity -should be sent back to Samaria, "to teach them the -manner of the god of the land." The priest selected -for the purpose returned, took up his residence at the -old shrine of Bethel, and "taught them how they -should fear Jehovah." His success was, however, -extremely limited, except among the former followers -of Jeroboam's dishonoured cult. The old religious -shrines still continued, and the immigrants used them -for the glorification of their former deities. Samaria, -therefore, witnessed the establishment of a singularly -hybrid form of religionism. The Babylonians worshipped -Succoth-Benoth,<a name="FNanchor_426_426" id="FNanchor_426_426"></a><a href="#Footnote_426_426" class="fnanchor">[426]</a> perhaps Zirbanit, wife of Merodach -or Bel; the Cuthites worshipped Nergal, the Assyrian -war-god, the lion-god;<a name="FNanchor_427_427" id="FNanchor_427_427"></a><a href="#Footnote_427_427" class="fnanchor">[427]</a> the Hittites, from Hamath, -worshipped Ashima or Esmn, the god of air and -thunder, under the form of a goat;<a name="FNanchor_428_428" id="FNanchor_428_428"></a><a href="#Footnote_428_428" class="fnanchor">[428]</a> the Avites preferred -Nibhaz and Tartak, perhaps Saturn—unless -these names be Jewish jeers, implying that one of these<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_257" id="Page_257">[Pg 257]</a></span> -deities had the head of a dog, and the other of an ass.<a name="FNanchor_429_429" id="FNanchor_429_429"></a><a href="#Footnote_429_429" class="fnanchor">[429]</a> -More dreadful, if less ridiculous, was the worship -of the Sepharvites, who adored Adrammelech and -Anammelech, the sun-god under male and female forms, -to whom, as to Moloch, they burnt their children in the -fire. As for ministers, "they made unto them priests -from among themselves,<a name="FNanchor_430_430" id="FNanchor_430_430"></a><a href="#Footnote_430_430" class="fnanchor">[430]</a> who offered sacrifices for them -in the shrines of the bamoth." Thus the whole mongrel -population "feared the Lord, and served their own -gods," as they continued to do in the days of the -annalist whose record the historian quotes. He ends -his interesting sketch with the words, that, in spite of -the Divine teaching, "these nations"—so he calls them, -and so completely does he refuse to them the dignity of -being Israel's children—feared the Lord, and served -their graven images, their children likewise, and their -children's children,—"as did their fathers, so do they -unto this day."<a name="FNanchor_431_431" id="FNanchor_431_431"></a><a href="#Footnote_431_431" class="fnanchor">[431]</a></p> - -<p>The "unto this day" refers, no doubt, to the document -from which the historian of the Kings was quoting—perhaps -about <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 560, in the third generation after -the fall of Samaria. A very brief glance will suffice to -indicate the future history of the Samaritans. We hear -but little of them between the present reference and -the days of Ezra and Nehemiah. By that time they -had purged themselves of these grosser idolatries, and -held themselves fit in all respects to co-operate with<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_258" id="Page_258">[Pg 258]</a></span> -the returned exiles in the work of building the Temple. -Such was not the opinion of the Jews. Ezra regarded -them as "the adversaries of Judah and Israel."<a name="FNanchor_432_432" id="FNanchor_432_432"></a><a href="#Footnote_432_432" class="fnanchor">[432]</a> The -exiles rejected their overtures. In <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 409 Manasseh, -a grandson of the high priest expelled by Nehemiah -for an unlawful marriage with a daughter of Sanballat, -of the Samaritan city of Beth-horon, built the schismatic -temple on Mount Gerizim.<a name="FNanchor_433_433" id="FNanchor_433_433"></a><a href="#Footnote_433_433" class="fnanchor">[433]</a> The relations of the -Samaritans to the Jews became thenceforth deadly. In -<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 175 they seconded the profane attempt of Antiochus -Epiphanes to paganise the Jews, and in <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 130 -John Hyrcanus, the Maccabee, destroyed their temple. -They were accused of waylaying Jews on their way -to the Feasts, and of polluting the Temple with dead -bones.<a name="FNanchor_434_434" id="FNanchor_434_434"></a><a href="#Footnote_434_434" class="fnanchor">[434]</a> They claimed Jewish descent (John iv. 12), -but our Lord called them "aliens" (ἀλλογενής, Luke -xvii. 18), and Josephus describes them as "residents -from other nations" (μέτοικοι, ἀλλοεθνεῖς). They -are now a rapidly dwindling community of fewer -than a hundred souls—"the oldest and smallest sect -in the world"—equally despised by Jews and -Mohammedans. The Jews, as in the days of Christ, -have no dealings with them. When Dr. Frankl, on his -philanthropic visit to the Jews of the East, went to see -their celebrated Pentateuch, and mentioned the fact to -a Jewish lady—"What!" she exclaimed: "have you -been among the worshippers of the pigeon? Take a<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_259" id="Page_259">[Pg 259]</a></span> -purifying bath!" Regarding Gerizim as the place -which God had chosen (John iv. 20), they alone can -keep up the old tradition of the <i>sacrificial</i> passover. -For long centuries, since the Fall of Jerusalem, it is -only on Gerizim that the Paschal lambs and kids have -been actually slain and eaten, as they are to this day, -and will be, till, not long hence, the whole tribe -disappears.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_260" id="Page_260">[Pg 260]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXII" id="CHAPTER_XXII">CHAPTER XXII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE REIGN OF AHAZ</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 735-715</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xvi. 1-20</h4> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 12.5em;">"Rimmon, whose delightful seat</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10em;">Was fair Damascus, on the fertile banks</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10em;">Of Abbana and Pharphar, lucid streams.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10em;">He also against the House of God was bold:</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10em;">A leper once he lost, and gained a king—</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10em;">Ahaz, his sottish conqueror, whom he drew</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10em;">God's altar to disparage and displace</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10em;">For one of Syrian mode, whereon to burn</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10em;">His odious offerings, and adore the gods</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10em;">Whom he had vanquished."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 21em;"><i>Paradise Lost</i>, i. 467-476.</span><br /> -</p> - -<p>According to our authorities, Ahaz ("Possessor")<a name="FNanchor_435_435" id="FNanchor_435_435"></a><a href="#Footnote_435_435" class="fnanchor">[435]</a> -began his reign of sixteen years at the age -of twenty. Of the exactitude of these references we -cannot be certain, because they also state (2 Kings -xviii. 2) that Hezekiah was twenty-five years old when -he began to reign, and this reduces us to the absurdity -of supposing that Hezekiah was born when his father -was only eleven years old.<a name="FNanchor_436_436" id="FNanchor_436_436"></a><a href="#Footnote_436_436" class="fnanchor">[436]</a> We might infer from -Isa. iii. 4 that Ahaz was not so old as twenty when he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_261" id="Page_261">[Pg 261]</a></span> -succeeded Jotham; for there—in a terrible prophecy -which can only refer to the beginning of this reign—we -read, "And I will give children to be their princes, and -babes shall rule over them"; or, as it should be perhaps -rendered, "And with childishness, or wilfulness, shall -they rule over them."</p> - -<p>Whatever may have been the king's age, surely never -king succeeded to a more distracted kingdom, or reigned -over a more terrified people! If he could have had any -choice in the matter, he might well have declined the -fearful burden. Describing the state of things, the great -prophet Isaiah, who now began his career, exclaims,—</p> - -<p>"For, behold, the Lord, the Lord of hosts, doth take -away from Jerusalem and from Judah stay and staff, -the whole stay of bread, and the whole stay of water; -the mighty man, and the man of war, the judge, and the -prophet, and the diviner, and the elder; the captain of -fifty, and the honourable man, and the counsellor, and -the cunning charmer, and the skilful enchanter. And the -people shall be oppressed every one by another, and -every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave -himself proudly against the elder, and the base against -the honourable. Then a man shall take hold of his -brother in the house of his father, saying, 'Thou hast -clothing, be <i>thou our judge, and let this ruin be under -thy hand</i>': in that day shall he lift his voice, saying, 'I -will not be a builder-up; for in my house is neither -bread nor clothing: ye shall not make me a ruler of the -people.' For Jerusalem is ruined and Judah is fallen. -The show of their countenance is against them; and -they declare their sin as Sodom, and hide it not. As -for My people, children are their oppressors, and women -rule over them."<a name="FNanchor_437_437" id="FNanchor_437_437"></a><a href="#Footnote_437_437" class="fnanchor">[437]</a></p> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_262" id="Page_262">[Pg 262]</a></span></p> -<p>This is a frightful picture of famine—the dearth of -intellect, the dearth of statesmen, of all genius, of all -insight. It describes the prevalence of oppression and -of ghastly destitution, accompanied by such utter despair -that no one cared to exert himself for the arrest -of the ruin which seemed imminent over that which -was already no better than itself a ruin.</p> - -<p>The Book of Isaiah is arranged in a most confused -and unchronological manner, and it is probable that the -first five chapters should be placed after the sixth, which -describes the prophet's call in the year that King Uzziah -died. They paint a picture of moral collapse. His -first chapter is called by Ewald "the great arraignment," -and by its references describes the awful period of alarm -during the war of Syria and Ephraim against Judah. -It might seem as if the combined host was even then in -the country, or had only just retired from it; for we -read,—</p> - -<p>"Your country is desolate, your cities are burned -with fire: your land, strangers devour it in your presence, -and it is desolate, as overthrown by strangers. And the -daughter of Zion is left as a booth in a wilderness, as a -lodge in a garden of cucumbers, as a besieged city."</p> - -<p>But even in the midst of this afflictive dispensation -there were no signs of repentance. The children of -Israel were rebels who despised the Holy One of -Israel,—"Ah, sinful nation, a people laden with iniquity, -a seed of evil-doers, children that deal corruptly!" -(i. 7-9). They had all the externals of religion: they -offered vain sacrifices, and kept a multitude of idle -feasts, and offered many formal prayers; but all this -was but a cumbrance to Him who desired clean hands -and a pure heart as conditions of forgiveness (10-20). -What hope could there be for a city of murderers, who<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_263" id="Page_263">[Pg 263]</a></span> -loved bribes and perverted judgment (21-24)? The -land was full of pride, full of idols, full of the luxury -of the rich amid the starvation of the poor (ii. 1-22).<a name="FNanchor_438_438" id="FNanchor_438_438"></a><a href="#Footnote_438_438" class="fnanchor">[438]</a> -Women partook of the general corruption. They -walked mincingly with stretched-forth necks and -wanton eyes,<a name="FNanchor_439_439" id="FNanchor_439_439"></a><a href="#Footnote_439_439" class="fnanchor">[439]</a> thinking of nothing but their anklets, -and crescents, and bracelets, and mufflers, ear-drops, -head-tires, perfumes, mirrors, armlets, and nose-jewels: -therefore they should have sackcloth for stomachers, -ropes for girdles, and burning instead of beauty, and -only a remnant should escape (iii. 16-iv. 1). Judah -was like a vineyard,—rich in advantages, blessed with -fondest care; but when God looked for grapes, it only -brought forth wild grapes—a semblance, but only a -poisoned semblance, of the true vintage: therefore it -should be left neglected and rainless. Woe to the -greedy land-grabbing, and drunkenness, and revelry -of the rich! Woe to their mockery of God and their -devotion to vanity! Woe to their insane pride and -wanton injustice! Could they escape vengeance? -No! Jehovah had looked for judgment (<i>mishpat</i>), but -behold oppression (<i>mishpach</i>); for righteousness (<i>tse'dakah</i>), -but behold a cry (<i>tse'akah</i>) (v. 1-24).<a name="FNanchor_440_440" id="FNanchor_440_440"></a><a href="#Footnote_440_440" class="fnanchor">[440]</a> They -might escape—they would escape—the Syrian and the -Ephraimite; but behind these lay a more terrible and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_264" id="Page_264">[Pg 264]</a></span> -a more portentous foe, even the Assyrian, the scourge -of God's wrath (25-30).</p> - -<p>"It was told the house of David, saying, Syria is -confederate with Ephraim." Is it strange that in such -a condition of things the heart of Ahaz and of his -people "was moved as the trees of the wood are moved -with the wind"?</p> - -<p>Such was the terrible crisis at which Isaiah began -his ministry. He was the son of Amoz,<a name="FNanchor_441_441" id="FNanchor_441_441"></a><a href="#Footnote_441_441" class="fnanchor">[441]</a> who has -been (much too precariously) identified with a brother -of Amaziah. It is probable that he was a man of -distinguished, if not princely, birth, and he exercised -a more powerful influence over the politics of his -country than any other prophet—not even excepting -Jeremiah.</p> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_265" id="Page_265">[Pg 265]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXIII" id="CHAPTER_XXIII">CHAPTER XXIII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>ISAIAH AND AHAZ</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xvi</h4> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"Expediency is man's wisdom; doing right is God's."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 26em;"><span class="smcap">George Meredith.</span></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>Isaiah was one of those men whom God provides -for the need of kingdoms. He was not only a -prophet, but a statesman, a reformer, a poet, a man of -invincible faith and unequalled insight. If Ahaz had -accepted his counsels and followed his moral guidance, -the whole history of Judah might have been different.</p> - -<p>But the position of things was indeed disastrous. -Judah was attacked from every side. On the south-east -the Edomites renewed their devastating raids, and -swept off multitudes of captives, who were sold as -slaves in the Western slave-markets. On the south-west -the Philistines once more rose in revolt, and -acquired permanent repossession of many parts of the -Shephelah, mastering Beth-Shemesh, Ajalon, Gederoth, -Shocho, Timnath, Gimzo, and all the adjacent districts. -But this was nothing compared with the humiliation -and destruction inflicted by Rezin and Pekah. They -shut up Ahaz in Jerusalem; and though they could -not storm its almost impregnable defences, which had -recently been fortified by Uzziah and Jotham, they -were undisputed masters of the rest of the land, so<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_266" id="Page_266">[Pg 266]</a></span> -that Judah was "brought low and made naked."<a name="FNanchor_442_442" id="FNanchor_442_442"></a><a href="#Footnote_442_442" class="fnanchor">[442]</a> -Rezin, indeed, weary of a tedious siege, swept southwards -to Elath, on the gulf of Akabah, seized it, and -peopled it with an Edomite garrison, thereby destroying -the commerce in which Solomon and Jehoshaphat had -taken pride, and which Uzziah had recently re-established. -Having thus left an effectual annoyance to -Judah in his rear, he gave up the design of dethroning -Ahaz and substituting in his place "<i>the son of Tabeal</i>," -who would have been a tool in the hands of the -confederate kings. He seized, however, a multitude -of captives, and with them and with much booty he -returned to Damascus. "The son of Tabeal"—a -name which occurs nowhere else—has been found very -puzzling.<a name="FNanchor_443_443" id="FNanchor_443_443"></a><a href="#Footnote_443_443" class="fnanchor">[443]</a> I believe it to be simply an instance of the -Rabbinic process of transposition, called <i>Themourah</i>. -Some identify it with Itibi'alu of an inscription of -Tiglath-Pileser. Others suppose that he was a Syrian, -and that Tabeal stands for Tabrimnon. But by the -application of Themourah (called the <i>Albam</i>) Tabeal -simply gives us "Remaliah," and is either a scornful -variation of the name of Pekah's father, or has arisen -from the watchword of a secret conspiracy. Since in -the text of Jeremiah (li. 41, xxv. 26) (by <i>Atbash</i>, -another form of the secret transposition of letters of -which the generic name was <i>Gematria</i>) we read <i>Sheshach</i> -for Babel, the name Tabeal may have been dealt -with in a similar method.<a name="FNanchor_444_444" id="FNanchor_444_444"></a><a href="#Footnote_444_444" class="fnanchor">[444]</a> Pekah, according to the -Chronicler, inflicted far deadlier injuries than Rezin. In -one day he slew one hundred and twenty thousand "sons<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_267" id="Page_267">[Pg 267]</a></span> -of valour," because they had forsaken Jehovah, God of -their fathers. His general Zichri, a mighty Ephraimite, -slew Maaseiah, the king's son;<a name="FNanchor_445_445" id="FNanchor_445_445"></a><a href="#Footnote_445_445" class="fnanchor">[445]</a> and Azrikam, the -chancellor; and Elkanah, "the second to the king." -The army carried away two hundred thousand captives -and much spoil to Samaria. But on their arrival, a -prophet named Oded<a name="FNanchor_446_446" id="FNanchor_446_446"></a><a href="#Footnote_446_446" class="fnanchor">[446]</a> reproved the Israelites for having -massacred the Judans "in a rage that reacheth to -heaven." Aided by various princes, he succeeded in -inducing the people to refuse to harbour the captives, -and clothed, fed, and sent them back unharmed to -Jericho, mounting the feeble on horses and asses. -The story bears on the face of it the signs of enormous -exaggeration.</p> - -<p>In the crisis of their miseries, but just before the -siege, Ahaz had gone outside the city walls "at the -end of the conduit of the upper pool, in the causeway -of the fuller's field," probably to look after the water-supply, -which had always been a difficulty for Jerusalem, -and on which depended her capacity to withstand a -siege. Here he was met by the prophet Isaiah, who -was leading by the hand the little son to whom he had -given the name of "Shear-jashub" ("A remnant shall -return"),<a name="FNanchor_447_447" id="FNanchor_447_447"></a><a href="#Footnote_447_447" class="fnanchor">[447]</a> as a witness to the truth of the prophecy -which he had heard on the occasion of his call,—</p> - -<p>"And if there should yet be a tenth in it, this shall -be again consumed; yet as the terebinth and the oak, -though cut down, have their stock remaining, even so a -sacred seed shall be the stock thereof."<a name="FNanchor_448_448" id="FNanchor_448_448"></a><a href="#Footnote_448_448" class="fnanchor">[448]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_268" id="Page_268">[Pg 268]</a></span></p> - -<p>The object of the prophet was to cheer up the -fainting heart of the king, and to say to him first,—</p> - -<p>"Take heed, and be quiet."</p> - -<p>This mandate probably refers to rumours—which -Isaiah must have heard—of the king's intention to -follow the counsels of the party which urged him to -seek foreign assistance. One of these parties advised -him to throw himself into the arms of Egypt, and rely -on her protection; the other gave the more perilous -counsel of invoking the aid of Assyria. Isaiah's -mandate to the king and to the nation was to take -neither step, but to trust in the Lord, and to repent -of individual and national misdoing. He summed up -his message in the rule,—</p> - -<p>"In returning and rest shall ye be saved; in quietness -and confidence shall be your strength."</p> - -<p>The advice was emphasised by a promise of the -most decisive and encouraging kind. When all looked -so helpless, the prophet was bidden to say,—</p> - -<p>"Fear not, neither be faint-hearted, for these two -stumps of smoking torches, for the fierce anger of -Rezin with Syria, and of Remaliah's son. They have -taken evil counsel against thee. But thus saith the -Lord God, 'It shall not stand, neither shall it come to -pass. For the head of Syria is only Rezin, and the -head of Samaria is a mere Remaliah's son.'"<a name="FNanchor_449_449" id="FNanchor_449_449"></a><a href="#Footnote_449_449" class="fnanchor">[449]</a></p> - -<p>And then, to confirm the lesson of confidence in God, -the brief assurance,—</p> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_269" id="Page_269">[Pg 269]</a></span></p> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"If ye will not confide,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Surely ye shall not abide."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>Convinced of the certainty of this immediate deliverance, -Isaiah bade the king to ask for a sign from Jehovah, -either in the height above, or in the depth beneath.</p> - -<p>But the timid and hypocritical king was not so to -be influenced. He had on his side "the scornful men, -who ruled Judah"; the mocking priests, who sneered -and jeered at Isaiah's teaching as repetitive and -commonplace, and only fit for children; and the princes -and nobles, who formed the Court party, headed by -Shebna the scribe. He probably looked on Isaiah as -a mere unpractical faddist, an excited fanatic—all very -well as a prophet, but not a man who ought to thrust -himself into the plans of politicians. Ahaz had his -own plans, and he had not the smallest intention of -altering them in consequence of anything which Isaiah -might say. He was far too timid and unfaithful to rely -on anything so vague as Divine assurance. He was -convinced that his only chance lay in the horses of -Egypt or the fierce infantry of Assyria. So he said -with sham piety, merely intended to put the prophet off, -"I will not ask, neither will I tempt Jehovah."</p> - -<p>That moment marks what may be called the birth-throe -of Messianic prophecy in its most specific -character. For then the prophet, after reproving the -king for wearying Jehovah as well as His servants, -adds, in words of far wider and deeper significance than -their immediate bearing, that Jehovah Himself should -give a sign; for the maiden should conceive and bear a -Son, and call His name Immanuel ("God with us"). -The child should grow up in a time of scarcity; for -owing to the devastation of the land, he would only be -able to be nurtured on curdled milk and honey. But<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_270" id="Page_270">[Pg 270]</a></span> -before he had reached years of discretion—before he -had arrived at the power of moral choice—the land whose -two kings Ahaz abhorred should be a desert. Yet let -not Ahaz exult too much in the immediate deliverance! -Days of unexampled misery were at hand. Jehovah -should hiss for the fly from the farthest canals of Egypt, -and for the bee of Assyria, and they should settle in -swarms in the valleys and pastures. Ahaz—he had -not alluded to the design, but Isaiah knew it well—was -about to hire a razor from beyond the Euphrates, but -that razor should sweep away the hair and beard of -Judah. Agriculture should languish, and the people -should only be able to live in privation on whey and -honey; and the vineyards should be full of briers and -thorns, and should be mere places for hunting.<a name="FNanchor_450_450" id="FNanchor_450_450"></a><a href="#Footnote_450_450" class="fnanchor">[450]</a></p> - -<p>This event, therefore, as Caspari says, stands at the -turning-point of Old Testament History. It marks -the beginning of that second period of the History of -the Chosen People in which their hopes were granted -as a counterpoise to their anguish and their humiliation. -"It stood, therefore, at the point where a prospect -offered itself to the eye of the prophet which reached -out over the whole development of the people of God."</p> - -<p>To all such prophecies Ahaz was utterly deaf: they -did not for a moment induce him to swerve from his -purpose. But to call still further attention to his -promise as the Syrian Ephraimitish host pressed -forward, Isaiah took a great piece of vellum, and -inscribed on it, in the ordinary characters,—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"<span class="smcap">Speed-plunder-haste-spoil.</span>"<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>He put it up in some conspicuous place, before his own -house or in the Temple, and took the priest Urijah and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_271" id="Page_271">[Pg 271]</a></span> -Zechariah, the son of Jeberechiah, into his confidence as -faithful witnesses. He told them the explanation of his -sign, and they would satisfy the curiosity of the people -on the subject. It meant that in nine months' time his -wife should bear a son, and that he and his wife, the -prophetess, would call the boy's name "Speed-plunder-haste-spoil," -as a sign that before the child -was able to say "Father" or "Mother" Rezin and -Pekah should be extinguished. For the Assyrian -should speed to the plunder and haste to the spoil, and -the riches of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria should -be carried away by the King of Assyria. Since Judah -despised "the soft flowing waters of Shiloah,"<a name="FNanchor_451_451" id="FNanchor_451_451"></a><a href="#Footnote_451_451" class="fnanchor">[451]</a> and -preferred Rezin and Pekah,<a name="FNanchor_452_452" id="FNanchor_452_452"></a><a href="#Footnote_452_452" class="fnanchor">[452]</a> they should be deluged -by the Euphrates of Assyria, and Assyria's outspread -wings should overshadow thy land, O Immanuel (viii. -1-8). How vain, then, of the people to try and meet -the confederacy of Syria and Ephraim by new confederacy -of Judah with Assyria! This, after all, is -Immanuel's land. God is with us. We have but to -fear God, we have but to be faithful to duty, and -Jehovah shall be our sanctuary, though He be a stumbling-block -to many in Israel, and a snare to many in -Jerusalem.<a name="FNanchor_453_453" id="FNanchor_453_453"></a><a href="#Footnote_453_453" class="fnanchor">[453]</a> This is God's teaching and God's testimony, -and Isaiah and his children are signs of it. For does -not Isaiah mean "Salvation of Jehovah"; and Shear-jashub, -"A remnant shall return"; and Maher-shalal-hash-baz, -"Swift-spoil-speedy-prey"; and Immanuel,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_272" id="Page_272">[Pg 272]</a></span> -"God is with us"? What need, then, to seek wizards -and necromancers? Seek God; confide, abide!<a name="FNanchor_454_454" id="FNanchor_454_454"></a><a href="#Footnote_454_454" class="fnanchor">[454]</a> -Trouble and darkness there should be; but all was not -utterly hopeless. Northern Israel had been bedimmed -and afflicted; but soon they should be exalted, and see -light, and their yoke be broken as in the day of Midian, -and the trampling boot and blood-stained mantle of -the warrior shall be burned in the fire: for a Child is -born, a Son is given unto us of David's line, who shall -be a Mighty Deliverer, a Prince of Peace,—and Israel -shall perish.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_273" id="Page_273">[Pg 273]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXIV" id="CHAPTER_XXIV">CHAPTER XXIV</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE APOSTASIES OF AHAZ</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xvi. 1-18</h4> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"For when we in our wickedness grow hard,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">Oh misery on't! the wise gods seal our eyes;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">In our own filth drop our clear judgments; make us</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">Adore our errors; laugh at us while we strut</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">To our confusion."</span></p> - - -<p>Ahaz was indifferent to these prophecies because -his heart was otherwhere. It is clear from our -authorities that this king had excited an unusually -deep antipathy in the hearts of those later writers who -judged religion not only from the earlier standpoint, -but from the stern and inexorable requirements of the -Deuteronomic and the Priestly Codes. The historian, -adopting an unusual phrase, says that "he did not -that which was right in the sight of the Lord, but he -walked in the ways of the kings of Israel." He not -only continued the high places, as the best of his predecessors -had done, but he increased their popularity -and importance by personally offering sacrifices and -burning incense "on the hills and under every green -tree." It is probable, too, that he introduced into Judah -horses and chariots dedicated to the sun.<a name="FNanchor_455_455" id="FNanchor_455_455"></a><a href="#Footnote_455_455" class="fnanchor">[455]</a> "He made<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_274" id="Page_274">[Pg 274]</a></span> -molten images for the Baalim," says the Chronicler, -"and burnt incense in the valley of the son of -Himmon."</p> - -<p>This last was his crowning atrocity: he actually -sanctioned the revolting worship of the abomination of -the children of Ammon, which Solomon had tolerated -on the mount of offence. "He made his son to pass -through the fire." The Chronicler expresses it still -more dreadfully by saying that "he <i>burnt his children</i> -in the fire."<a name="FNanchor_456_456" id="FNanchor_456_456"></a><a href="#Footnote_456_456" class="fnanchor">[456]</a></p> - -<p>In the Valley of Ben-Hinnom, or of the Ben-Hinnom, -of which the name is perpetuated in Gehenna, the place -of torture for lost souls, there stood a frightful image -of the king—Moloch, Melek, Malcham. It represented -the sun-god, worshipped, not only as Baal under the -emblems of prolific nature, but, like the Egyptian -Typhon, as the emblem of the sun's scorching and -blighting force. It was perhaps a human figure with -the head of an ox. The arms of the brazen image -sloped downwards over a cistern, which was filled with -fuel; and when a human sacrifice was to be offered to -him, the child was probably first killed, and then placed -on these brazen arms as a gift to the idol. It rolled -down into the flaming tank, and was consumed amid -the strains of music. Recourse was only had to the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_275" id="Page_275">[Pg 275]</a></span> -most frightful form of human sacrifice—the burning of -grown-up victims—in extremities of disaster, as when -Mesha of Moab offered up his eldest son to Chemosh -on the wall of Kir-Hareseth in the sight of his people -and of the three invading armies. But the sacrifice -of children was public, and perhaps annual. Hence -Milton, following the learned researches of Selden in -his Syntagma <i>De Dis Syriis</i>, writes:—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"First, Moloch, horrid king, besmeared with blood<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Of human sacrifice, and parents' tears;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Though, for the noise of drums and timbrels loud,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Their children's cries unheard that pass'd through fire<br /></span> -<span class="i1">To his grim idol. Him the Ammonite<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Worshipp'd in Rabba and her watery plain,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">In Argob and in Basan, to the stream<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Of utmost Arnon. Nor content with such<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Audacious neighbourhood, the wisest heart<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Of Solomon he led by fraud to build<br /></span> -<span class="i1">His temple right against the Temple of God<br /></span> -<span class="i1">On that opprobrious hill, and made his grove<br /></span> -<span class="i1">The pleasant Valley of Hinnom, Tophet thence<br /></span> -<span class="i1">And black Gehenna call'd, the type of hell."<a name="FNanchor_457_457" id="FNanchor_457_457"></a><a href="#Footnote_457_457" class="fnanchor">[457]</a><br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>But it may be doubted whether Ahaz, in spite of his -frightful position, or, in later days, the less excusable -Manasseh, really destroyed the lives of their young -sons.<a name="FNanchor_458_458" id="FNanchor_458_458"></a><a href="#Footnote_458_458" class="fnanchor">[458]</a> The ancients had a notion that they could -easily cheat their devil-deities. If a white ox of -Clitumnus became unfitted for a victim to Jupiter of -the Capitol by having on its body a few black spots, it<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_276" id="Page_276">[Pg 276]</a></span> -was quite sufficient to make it pass with the <i>D faciles</i> -by chalking the black spots over it.<a name="FNanchor_459_459" id="FNanchor_459_459"></a><a href="#Footnote_459_459" class="fnanchor">[459]</a> If human victims -had to be thrown into the Tiber to Hercules, Numa -taught the people that little wickerwork images (<i>scirpea</i>) -would suit the purpose just as well.<a name="FNanchor_460_460" id="FNanchor_460_460"></a><a href="#Footnote_460_460" class="fnanchor">[460]</a> Figures of dough -were sometimes offered instead of human beings on the -altar of Artemis of Tauris. Thus it became the custom, -it is believed, merely to throw or to pass children -through or over the flames, and conventionally to -<i>regard them</i> as having been sacrificed, though they -might escape the ordeal with little or no hurt. This -was called <i>februatio</i>, or "lustration by fire."<a name="FNanchor_461_461" id="FNanchor_461_461"></a><a href="#Footnote_461_461" class="fnanchor">[461]</a> We may -hope that this device was adopted by the two Judan -kings, and, if so, they did not add to their horrible -apostasy the crime of infanticide. If, however, Ahaz -was even to the smallest extent implicated in such foul -idolatries, it is not surprising that he was in no mood -to listen to Isaiah. What is profoundly surprising, -and is indeed a circumstance for which we cannot -account, is that no word of fierce indignation was -addressed to him on this account by Urijah, the high -priest, whom Isaiah seems to describe as faithful, or -by Zechariah, the son of Jeberechiah, or by Micah, -or by Isaiah, who feared man so little and God -so much.</p> - -<p>The Assyrian party at the Court of Ahaz prevailed -over the Egyptian. Until the accession of the Ethiopian<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_277" id="Page_277">[Pg 277]</a></span> -Sabaco<a name="FNanchor_462_462" id="FNanchor_462_462"></a><a href="#Footnote_462_462" class="fnanchor">[462]</a> in 725, Egypt was indeed in so weak, harassed, -and divided a condition under feeble native Pharaohs, -that her help was obviously unavailable. The King of -Judah, seeing no extrication from his calamities except -in the way of worldly expediency, appealed to Tiglath-Pileser. -In this he followed the precedent of his -ancestor Asa, who had diverted the attack of Baasha -by invoking the assistance of Syria. Ahaz sent to the -Assyrian potentate the humble message, "I am thy -servant and thy son: come up and save me from the -Kings of Syria and Israel." If he had not faith to -accept Isaiah's promises, what else could he do, when -Syria, Israel, the Philistines, Edom, and Moab were -all arrayed against him? The ambassadors probably -made their way, not without peril, along the east of -Jordan, or else by sea from Joppa, and so inland. -Whether they took with them the enormous bribe -without which the appeal of the helpless king might -have been in vain, or whether this was sent subsequently -under Assyrian escort, we do not know. It -was euphemistically described as "a present" or "a -blessing," but must be regarded either as a tribute or -a bribe.</p> - -<p>Tiglath-Pileser II. saw his opportunity, and at -once invaded Damascus. In <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 733 he failed, but -the next year he entirely subjugated the kingdom, and -put an end to the dynasty. Rezin was probably put -to death with the horrible barbarities which were -normal among the brutal Ninevites; and as the -Assyrians had no conception of colonisation or the -wise government of dependencies, the Syrian population<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_278" id="Page_278">[Pg 278]</a></span> -was deported <i>en masse</i> to Elam and an unknown -Kir.<a name="FNanchor_463_463" id="FNanchor_463_463"></a><a href="#Footnote_463_463" class="fnanchor">[463]</a> For a time Damascus was made "a ruinous -heap," and the cities of Aroer were the desolated lairs -of pasturing flocks. Israel, as we have seen, was -next overwhelmed by the same irremediable catastrophe, -none of her people being left except such as might be -compared to the mere gleanings of a vintage, and the -few berries on the topmost boughs of the olive tree.<a name="FNanchor_464_464" id="FNanchor_464_464"></a><a href="#Footnote_464_464" class="fnanchor">[464]</a></p> - -<p>Tiglath-Pileser meant to make Ahaz feel his yoke. -He summoned him to do homage at Damascus, and -there Ahaz once more displayed his cosmopolitan -stheticism at the expense of every pure tradition -of the religion of his fathers.</p> - -<p>His visit to Damascus was no doubt compulsory. -His worldly policy, which looked so expedient, and -which—apart from the defiance which it involved to -the voice of God by His prophets—seemed to be so -pardonable, had for the time succeeded. Isaiah's -promises had been fulfilled to the letter. There was -nothing more to fear either from Rezin or from -Remaliah's son. Their kingdoms were a desolation. -In his own annals Tiglath-Pileser<a name="FNanchor_465_465" id="FNanchor_465_465"></a><a href="#Footnote_465_465" class="fnanchor">[465]</a> does not exaggerate -his achievements.<a name="FNanchor_466_466" id="FNanchor_466_466"></a><a href="#Footnote_466_466" class="fnanchor">[466]</a> He wrote as follows:—</p> - -<p> -"Rezin's warriors I captured, and with the sword I destroyed.<br /> -<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_279" id="Page_279">[Pg 279]</a></span><span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Of his charioteers and [his horsemen] the arms I broke:</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Their bow-bearing warriors, [their footmen] armed with spear and shield,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">With my hand I captured them, and those that fought in their battle-line.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">He to save his life fled away alone;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Like a deer [he ran], and entered into the great gate of his city.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">His generals, whom I had taken alive, on crosses I hung;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">His country I subdued;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Damascus, his city, I subdued, and like a caged bird I shut him in.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I cut down the unnumbered trees of his forest; I left not one.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Hadara, the palace of the father of Rezin of Syria, [I burnt].</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">The city of Samaria I besieged, I captured; eight hundred of its people and children I took;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Their oxen and their sheep I carried away.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I took five hundred and ninety-one cities;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Over sixteen districts of Syria like a flood I swept."</span><br /> -</p> - -<p>But the more complete destruction of Israel was due -to Shalmaneser IV., who says,—</p> - -<p> -"The city of Samaria I besieged, I took,<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I carried away twenty-seven thousand two hundred of its inhabitants;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I seized fifty of their chariots.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I gave up to plunder the rest of their possessions.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I appointed officers over them;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I laid on them the tribute of the former king.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">In their place I settled the men of conquered countries."</span><br /> -</p> - -<p>The immediate service to Judah looked immense. -The Assyrian might safely claim, and Ahaz might -truthfully confess, that the intervention of Tiglath-Pileser -had rescued him from the apparent imminence -of destruction. But the Assyrian kings served no one -for nothing. The price which had to be paid for -Tiglath-Pileser's intervention was vassalage and tribute. -Ahaz, or, as the Assyrians call him, Jehoahaz,<a name="FNanchor_467_467" id="FNanchor_467_467"></a><a href="#Footnote_467_467" class="fnanchor">[467]</a> had<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_280" id="Page_280">[Pg 280]</a></span> -styled himself Tiglath-Pileser's "servant and his son," -and the Assyrian chose to have substantial proof of -this parental suzerainty. The great king therefore -summoned the poor subject-potentate to Damascus, -where he was holding his victorious court.</p> - -<p>So far Ahaz had no reason to complain of his -"dreadful patron"; and if he had returned when he -paid his homage, no immediate harm would have -happened. But during his visit he saw "the altar" -(<i>Heb.</i>) at the conquered city. Was it the altar of the -defeated Syrian god Rimmon? or did the Assyrian -persuade his willing vassal to sacrifice at the portable -altar of his god Assur? We may, perhaps, infer the -former from 2 Chron. xxviii. 23, where Ahaz says: -"Because the gods of the kings of Syria help them, -therefore will I sacrifice to them, that they may help -me." There is room to suspect some error here, -because Rezin had fallen, and Damascus was in ruins, -and Rimmon had conspicuously failed to help or to -avenge his votaries.<a name="FNanchor_468_468" id="FNanchor_468_468"></a><a href="#Footnote_468_468" class="fnanchor">[468]</a> Ahaz admired the altar, to whatever -god it had been erected; and unmindful, or -perhaps unconscious, that the altar of the Temple of -Jerusalem was declared in the Pentateuch to have been -divinely ordained—a fact to which the historian does not -himself refer—he sent to the head priest Urijah a pattern -of the altar which had struck his fancy at Damascus. -The subservient priest, without a murmur or a remonstrance, -undertook to have a similar altar ready for -Ahaz in the Temple by the time of his return—a crime, -if crime it were, which the Chronicler conceals. "Never<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_281" id="Page_281">[Pg 281]</a></span> -any prince was so foully idolatrous," says Bishop Hall, -"as that he wanted a priest to second him. A Urijah -is fit to humour an Ahaz.<a name="FNanchor_469_469" id="FNanchor_469_469"></a><a href="#Footnote_469_469" class="fnanchor">[469]</a> Greatness could never -command anything which some servile wits were not -ready both to applaud and justify." Certainly we -should have hoped for more fidelity to ancient tradition -from a man who earned the approving word of Isaiah; -but it is only fair and just to admit that Urijah, in the -universal ignorance which prevailed about the codes -which were afterwards collected and published as the -total legislation of the wilderness, may have viewed his -obedience to the king's commands with very different -eyes from those by which it was regarded in the sixth -and fifth centuries before Christ. He may have been -frankly unaware that he was guilty of an act which -would afterwards be denounced as an apostatising -enormity.<a name="FNanchor_470_470" id="FNanchor_470_470"></a><a href="#Footnote_470_470" class="fnanchor">[470]</a></p> - -<p>When Ahaz returned, he was so much pleased with -his new plaything that he at once acted as priest at -his own new altar. Without the least opposition from<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_282" id="Page_282">[Pg 282]</a></span> -the priests—who had so sternly resisted Uzziah—he -offered burnt-offerings and meat-offerings and drink-offerings, -and sprinkled the blood of peace-offerings -on his altar.<a name="FNanchor_471_471" id="FNanchor_471_471"></a><a href="#Footnote_471_471" class="fnanchor">[471]</a> Not content with this, he did not hesitate -to order the removal of the huge brazen altar from -the position, in front of the Temple porch, which it had -held since the days of Solomon. He did this in order -that his own favourite altar might be in the line of -vision from the court, and not be overshadowed by -the old one, which he shifted from the place of honour -to the north side. He proceeded to call his own altar -"the great altar," and ordered that the morning burnt-offering, -and the evening <i>minchah</i>, and all the principal -sacrifices should henceforth be offered upon it.<a name="FNanchor_472_472" id="FNanchor_472_472"></a><a href="#Footnote_472_472" class="fnanchor">[472]</a> He -did not wholly supersede the old brazen altar, which, -he said, "shall be for me to inquire by," or, as the -Hebrew may perhaps mean, "it should await"—<i>i.e.</i>, -"I will hereafter consider what to do with it."</p> - -<p>Ahaz is charged with the additional crime of removing -the ornamental festoons of bronze pomegranates from -the lavers, and the brazen oxen from under the molten -sea, which henceforth lay dishonoured, without its -proper and splendid supports, on the pavement of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_283" id="Page_283">[Pg 283]</a></span> -court.<a name="FNanchor_473_473" id="FNanchor_473_473"></a><a href="#Footnote_473_473" class="fnanchor">[473]</a> He also took away the balustrade of the royal -"ascent" from the palace to the Temple, and made -a new entrance of a less gorgeous character than that -which, in the days of Solomon, the Queen of Sheba -had admired.<a name="FNanchor_474_474" id="FNanchor_474_474"></a><a href="#Footnote_474_474" class="fnanchor">[474]</a></p> - -<p>No doubt these proceedings helped to heighten the -unpopularity of Ahaz. But what could he do? He -could, indeed, if he had had sufficient faith, have -"trusted in Jehovah," as Isaiah bade him do. But -he was under the terrific pressure of hostile circumstances, -and, being a weak and timid man, felt himself -unable to resist the influence of the haughty politicians -and worldly priests by whom he was surrounded—men -who openly made Isaiah their scoff. When he invited -the interposition of Tiglath-Pileser,<a name="FNanchor_475_475" id="FNanchor_475_475"></a><a href="#Footnote_475_475" class="fnanchor">[475]</a> all the other consequences -of humiliation would naturally follow. He -probably disliked as much as any one to see the great -molten laver taken off the backs of the oxen which -showed the skill of the ancient Hiram, and did not -admire the despoiled aspect of the shrine of his capital. -But if the King of Assyria or his emissaries had (as -the historian implies) cast greedy eyes on these splendid -objects of antiquity, the poor vassal could not refuse -them. Better, he may have thought, that these material -ornaments should go to Nineveh than that he should<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_284" id="Page_284">[Pg 284]</a></span> -be forced to exact yet heavier burdens from an impoverished -people. His expedient is mentioned among -his crimes, yet no one blamed the pious Hezekiah -when, under similar circumstances, he acted in precisely -the same manner.<a name="FNanchor_476_476" id="FNanchor_476_476"></a><a href="#Footnote_476_476" class="fnanchor">[476]</a></p> - -<p>The Chronicler gives a darker aspect to his misdoings -by saying that he cut to pieces the vessels of -the house of God, and made him altars in every corner -of Jerusalem, and <i>bamoth</i> to burn incense unto other -gods in every several city of Judah. He says, further, -that he closed the great gates of the Temple; put an -end to the kindling of the lamps, the burning of incense, -and the daily offerings; and left the whole Temple to -fall into ruin and neglect.<a name="FNanchor_477_477" id="FNanchor_477_477"></a><a href="#Footnote_477_477" class="fnanchor">[477]</a> We know no more of him. -He lived through an epoch marked by the final crisis -in the existence of the kingdom of Israel. Dark omens -of every kind were around him, and he seems to have -been too frivolous to see them. If he plumed himself -on the removal of the two relentless invaders Rezin -and Pekah, he must have lived to feel that the terror -of Assyria had come appreciably nearer. Tiglath-Pileser -had only helped Judah in furtherance of his -own designs, and his exactions came like a chronic -distress after the acuter crisis. Nor was there any -improvement when he died in 727. He was succeeded -by Shalmaneser IV., and Shalmaneser IV. by Sargon -in 722, the year of the fall of Samaria. We know no -more of Ahaz. The historian says that he was buried -with his fathers, and the Chronicler adds, as in the case<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_285" id="Page_285">[Pg 285]</a></span> -of Uzziah and other kings, that he was not permitted -to rest in the sepulchres of the kings.<a name="FNanchor_478_478" id="FNanchor_478_478"></a><a href="#Footnote_478_478" class="fnanchor">[478]</a> He had sown -the wind; his son Hezekiah had to reap the whirlwind.<a name="FNanchor_479_479" id="FNanchor_479_479"></a><a href="#Footnote_479_479" class="fnanchor">[479]</a></p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_286" id="Page_286">[Pg 286]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="Probable_Dates" id="Probable_Dates"><span class="smcap">Probable Dates.</span></a></h2> - - -<blockquote> - -<p><span class="smcap">b.c.</span></p> - -<p>745. Accession of Tiglath-Pileser.</p> - -<p>746. Death of Uzziah. Accession of Jotham. First vision -of Isaiah (Isa. vi.).</p> - -<p>735. Accession of Ahaz. Syro-Ephraimitish war.</p> - -<p>734-732. Siege and capture of Damascus, and ravage of -Northern Israel by Tiglath-Pileser. Visit of Ahaz -to Damascus.</p> - -<p>727. Accession of Shalmaneser IV.</p> - -<p>722. Accession of Sargon. Capture of Samaria, and captivity -of the Ten Tribes.</p> - -<p>720. Defeat of Sabaco by Sargon at Raphia.</p> - -<p>715(?). Accession of Hezekiah.</p> - -<p>711. Sargon captures Ashdod.</p> - -<p>707. Sargon defeats Merodach-Baladan, and captures -Babylon.</p> - -<p>705. Murder of Sargon. Accession of Sennacherib.</p> - -<p>701. Sennacherib besieges Ekron. Defeats Egypt at Altaqu. -Invades Judah, and spares Hezekiah. Invades -Egypt, and sends the Rabshakeh to Jerusalem. -Disaster of Assyrians at Pelusium, and disappearance -from before Jerusalem.</p> - -<p>697. Death of Hezekiah. Accession of Manasseh.</p> - -<p>681. Death of Sennacherib.</p> - -<p>608. Battle of Megiddo. Death of Josiah.</p> - -<p>607. Fall of Nineveh and Assyria. Triumph of Babylon.</p> - -<p>605. Battle of Carchemish. Defeat of Pharaoh Necho by -Nebuchadrezzar.</p> - -<p>599. First deportation of Jews to Babylon by Nebuchadrezzar.</p> - -<p>588. Destruction of Jerusalem. Second deportation.</p> - -<p>538. Cyrus captures Babylon.</p> - -<p>536. Decree of Cyrus. Return of Zerubbabel and the first -Jewish exiles.</p> - -<p>458. Return of Ezra.</p></blockquote> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_287" id="Page_287">[Pg 287]</a></span></p> - - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXV" id="CHAPTER_XXV">CHAPTER XXV</a></h2> - -<h3><i>HEZEKIAH</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 715-686<a name="FNanchor_480_480" id="FNanchor_480_480"></a><a href="#Footnote_480_480" class="fnanchor">[480]</a></h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xviii</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"For Ezekias had done the thing that pleased the Lord, and was -strong in the ways of David his father, as Esay the prophet, who -was great and faithful in his vision, had commanded him,"—<span class="smcap">Ecclus.</span> -xlviii. 22.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>The reign of Hezekiah was epoch-making in many -respects, but especially for its religious reformation, -and the relations of Judah with Assyria and with -Babylon. It is also most closely interwoven with the -annals of Hebrew prophecy, and acquires unwonted -lustre from the magnificent activity and impassioned -eloquence of the great prophet Isaiah, who merits in -many ways the title of "the Evangelical Prophet," and -who was the greatest of the prophets of the Old -Dispensation.</p> - -<p>According to the notice in 2 Kings xviii. 2, Hezekiah -was twenty-five years old when he began to reign in -the third year of Hoshea of Israel. This, however, -is practically impossible consistently with the dates -that Ahaz reigned sixteen years and became king at -the age of twenty, for it would then follow that -Hezekiah was born when his father was a mere boy—and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_288" id="Page_288">[Pg 288]</a></span> -this, although Hezekiah does not seem to have -been the eldest son; for Ahaz had burnt "his son," -and, according to the Chronicler, more than one son, -to propitiate Moloch. Probably Hezekiah was a boy of -fifteen when he began to reign. The chronology of his -reign of twenty-nine years is, unhappily, much confused.</p> - -<p>The historian of the Kings agrees with the Chronicler, -and the son of Sirach, in pronouncing upon him a high -eulogy, and making him equal even to David in faithfulness. -There is, however, much difference in the -method of their descriptions of his doings. The historian -devotes but one verse to his reformation—which -probably began early in his reign, though it occupied -many years. The Chronicler, on the other hand, in -his three chapters manages to overlook, if not to -suppress, the one incident of the reformation which -is of the deepest interest. It is exactly one of those -suppressions which help to create the deep misgiving -as to the historic exactness of this biassed and late -historian. It must be regarded as doubtful whether -many of the Levitic details in which he revels are or -are not intended to be literally historic. Imaginative -additions to literal history became common among the -Jews after the Exile, and leaders of that day instinctively -drew the line between moral homiletics and -literal history. It may be perfectly historical that, as -the Chronicler says, Hezekiah opened and repaired the -Temple; gathered the priests and the Levites together, -and made them cleanse themselves; offered a solemn -sacrifice; reappointed the musical services; and—though -this can hardly have been till after the Fall of -Samaria in 722—invited all the Israelites to a solemn, -but in some respects irregular, passover of fourteen -days. It may be true also that he broke up the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_289" id="Page_289">[Pg 289]</a></span> -idolatrous altars in Jerusalem, and tossed their <i>dbris</i> -into the Kidron; and (again after the deportation of -Israel) destroyed some of the <i>bamoth</i> in Israel as well -as in Judah. If he reinstituted the courses of the -priests, the collection of tithes, and all else that he is -said to have done,<a name="FNanchor_481_481" id="FNanchor_481_481"></a><a href="#Footnote_481_481" class="fnanchor">[481]</a> he accomplished quite as much as -was effected in the reign of his great-grandson Josiah. -But while the Chronicler dwells on all this at such -length, what induces him to omit the most significant -fact of all—the destruction of the brazen serpent?</p> - -<p>The historian tells us that Hezekiah "removed the -<i>bamoth</i>"—the chapels on the high places, with their -ephods and teraphim—whether dedicated to the worship -of Jehovah or profaned by alien idolatry. That he did, -or attempted, something of this kind seems certain; for -the Rabshakeh, if we regard his speech as historical -in its details, actually taunted him with impiety, and -threatened him with the wrath of Jehovah on this very -account. Yet here we are at once met with the many -difficulties with which the history of Israel abounds, -and which remind us at every turn that we know much -less about the inner life and religious conditions of the -Hebrews than we might infer from a superficial study -of the historians who wrote so many centuries after the -events which they describe. Over and over again their -incidental notices reveal a condition of society and -worship which violently collides with what seems to -be their general estimate. Who, for instance, would -not infer from this notice that in Judah, at any rate, -the king's suppression of the "high places," and above -all of those which were idolatrous, had been tolerably -thorough? How much, then, are we amazed to find<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_290" id="Page_290">[Pg 290]</a></span> -that Hezekiah had not effectually desecrated even the -old shrines which Solomon had erected to Ashtoreth, -Chemosh, and Milcom<a name="FNanchor_482_482" id="FNanchor_482_482"></a><a href="#Footnote_482_482" class="fnanchor">[482]</a> "at the right hand of the mount -of corruption"—in other words, on one of the peaks -of the Mount of Olives, in full view of the walls of -Jerusalem and of the Temple Hill!</p> - -<p>"And he brake the images," or, as the R.V. more -correctly renders it, "the pillars," the <i>matstseboth</i>. -Originally—that is, before the appearance of the Deuteronomic -and the Priestly Codes—no objection seems to -have been felt to the erection of a <i>matstsebah</i>. Jacob -erected one of these <i>baitulia</i> or anointed stones at -Bethel, with every sign of Divine approval.<a name="FNanchor_483_483" id="FNanchor_483_483"></a><a href="#Footnote_483_483" class="fnanchor">[483]</a> Moses -erected twelve round his altar at Sinai.<a name="FNanchor_484_484" id="FNanchor_484_484"></a><a href="#Footnote_484_484" class="fnanchor">[484]</a> Joshua erected -them in Shechem and on Mount Ebal. Hosea, in one -passage (iii. 4), seems to mention pillars, ephods, and -teraphim as legitimate objects of desire. Whether they -have any relation to obelisks, and what is their exact -significance, is uncertain; but they had become objects -of just suspicion in the universal tendency to idolatry, -and in the deepening conviction that the second commandment -required a far more rigid adherence than it -had hitherto received.</p> - -<p>"And cut down the groves"—or rather the Asherim, -the wooden, and probably in some instances phallic, -emblems of the nature-goddess Asherah, the goddess of -fertility.<a name="FNanchor_485_485" id="FNanchor_485_485"></a><a href="#Footnote_485_485" class="fnanchor">[485]</a> She is sometimes identified with Astarte,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_291" id="Page_291">[Pg 291]</a></span> -the goddess of the moon and of love; but there is no -sufficient ground for the identification. Some, indeed, -doubt whether Asherah is the name of a goddess at all. -They suppose that the word only means a consecrated -pole or pillar, emblematic of the sacred tree.<a name="FNanchor_486_486" id="FNanchor_486_486"></a><a href="#Footnote_486_486" class="fnanchor">[486]</a></p> - -<p>Then comes the startling addition, "And brake in -pieces the brazen serpent that Moses had made: <i>for -unto those days the children of Israel did burn incense to -it</i>." This addition is all the more singular because the -Hebrew tense implies habitual worship. The story of -the brazen serpent of the wilderness is told in Num. -xxi. 9; but not an allusion to it occurs anywhere, till -now—some eight centuries later—we are told that up -to this time the children of Israel had been in the habit -of burning incense to it! Comparing Num. xxi. 4, -with xxxiii. 42, we find that the scene of the serpent-plague -of the Exodus was either Zalmonah ("the place -of the image") or Punon, which Bochart connects with -Phainoi, a place mentioned as famous for copper-mines.<a name="FNanchor_487_487" id="FNanchor_487_487"></a><a href="#Footnote_487_487" class="fnanchor">[487]</a> -Moses, for unknown reasons, chose it as an innocent -and potent symbol; but obviously in later days it -subserved, or was mingled with, the tendency to -ophiolatry, which has been fatally common in all ages<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_292" id="Page_292">[Pg 292]</a></span> -in many heathen lands. It is indeed most difficult to -understand a state of things in which the children of -Israel habitually <i>burned incense</i> to this venerable relic, -nor can we imagine that this was done without the -cognisance and connivance of the priests. Ewald -makes the conjecture that the brazen <i>Saraph</i> had been -left at Zalmonah, and was an occasional object of -Israelite adoration in pilgrimage for the purpose. There -is, however, nothing more extraordinary in the prevalence -of serpent-worship among the Jews than in the -fact that, "in the cities of Judah and the streets of -Jerusalem, we" (the Jews), "and our fathers, our kings, -and our princes, burnt incense unto the Queen of -Heaven."<a name="FNanchor_488_488" id="FNanchor_488_488"></a><a href="#Footnote_488_488" class="fnanchor">[488]</a> If this were the case, the serpent may -have been brought to Jerusalem in the idolatrous reign -of Ahaz. It shows an intensity of reforming zeal, and -an inspired insight into the reality of things, that -Hezekiah should not have hesitated to smash to pieces -so interesting a relic of the oldest history of his people, -rather than see it abused to idolatrous purposes.<a name="FNanchor_489_489" id="FNanchor_489_489"></a><a href="#Footnote_489_489" class="fnanchor">[489]</a> -Certainly, in conduct so heroic, and hatred of idolatry -so strong, the Puritans might well find sufficient -authority for removing from Westminster Abbey the -images of the Virgin, which, in their opinion, had -been worshipped, and before which lamps had been -perpetually burned. If we can imagine an English -king breaking to pieces the shrine of the Confessor in -the Abbey, or a French king destroying the sacred<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_293" id="Page_293">[Pg 293]</a></span> -ampulla of Rheims or the <i>goupillon</i> of St. Eligius, on -the ground that many regarded them with superstitious -reverence, we may measure the effect produced by this -startling act of Puritan zeal on the part of Hezekiah.</p> - -<p>"And he called it <i>Nehushtan</i>." If this rendering—in -which our A.V. and R.V. follow the LXX. and the -Vulgate—be correct, Hezekiah justified the iconoclasm -by a brilliant play of words.<a name="FNanchor_490_490" id="FNanchor_490_490"></a><a href="#Footnote_490_490" class="fnanchor">[490]</a> The Hebrew words for -"a serpent" (<i>nachash</i>) and for brass (<i>nechosheth</i>) are -closely akin to each other; and the king showed his -just estimate of the relic which had been so shamefully -abused by contemptuously designating it—as it was in -itself and apart from its sacred historic associations—"nehushtan," -a thing of brass. The rendering, however, -is uncertain, for the phrase may be impersonal—"one" -or "they" called it Nehushtan<a name="FNanchor_491_491" id="FNanchor_491_491"></a><a href="#Footnote_491_491" class="fnanchor">[491]</a>—in which case -the assonance had lost any ironic connotation.<a name="FNanchor_492_492" id="FNanchor_492_492"></a><a href="#Footnote_492_492" class="fnanchor">[492]</a></p> - -<p>For this act of purity of worship, and for other -reasons, the historian calls Hezekiah the best of all the -kings of Judah, superior alike to all his predecessors -and all his successors. He regarded him as coming up<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_294" id="Page_294">[Pg 294]</a></span> -to the Deuteronomic ideal, and says that therefore "the -Lord was with him, and he prospered whithersoever he -went forth."</p> - -<p>The date of this great reformation is rendered uncertain -by the impossibility of ascertaining the exact -order of Isaiah's prophecies. The most probable view -is that it was gradual, and some of the king's most -effective measures may not have been carried out till -after the deliverance from Assyria. It is clear, however, -that the wisdom of Hezekiah and his counsellors -began from the first to uplift Judah from the degradation -and decrepitude to which it had sunk under the reign -of Ahaz. The boy-king found a wretched state of -affairs at his accession. His father had bequeathed -to him "an empty treasury, a ruined peasantry, an -unprotected frontier, and a shattered army";<a name="FNanchor_493_493" id="FNanchor_493_493"></a><a href="#Footnote_493_493" class="fnanchor">[493]</a> but -although he was still the vassal of Assyria, he reverted -to the ideas of his great-grandfather Uzziah. He -strengthened the city, and enabled it to stand a siege -by improving the water-supply. Of these labours we -have, in all probability, a most interesting confirmation -in the inscription by Hezekiah's engineers, discovered -in 1880, on the rocky walls of the subterranean tunnel -(<i>siloh</i>) between the spring of Gihon and the Pool of -Siloam.<a name="FNanchor_494_494" id="FNanchor_494_494"></a><a href="#Footnote_494_494" class="fnanchor">[494]</a> He encouraged agriculture, the storage of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_295" id="Page_295">[Pg 295]</a></span> -produce, and the proper tendance of flocks and herds, -so that he acquired wealth which dimly reminded men -of the days of Solomon.</p> - -<p>There is little doubt that he early meditated revolt -from Assyria; for renewed faithfulness to Jehovah had -elevated the moral tone, and therefore the courage and -hopefulness, of the whole people. The Forty-Sixth -Psalm, whatever may be its date, expresses the invincible -spirit of a nation which in its penitence and self-purification -began to feel itself irresistible, and could -sing:—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"God is our hope and strength,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">A very present help in trouble.<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Therefore will we not fear, though the earth be moved,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Though the hills be carried into the midst of the sea.<br /></span> -<span class="i1">There is a river, the streams whereof make glad the city of God,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">The Holy City where dwells the Most High.<br /></span> -<span class="i1">God is in the midst of her; therefore shall she not be shaken:<br /></span> -<span class="i1">God shall help her, and that right early.<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Heathens raged and kingdoms trembled:<br /></span> -<span class="i1">He lifted His voice—the earth melted away.<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Jehovah of Hosts is with us;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Elohim of Jacob is our refuge."<a name="FNanchor_495_495" id="FNanchor_495_495"></a><a href="#Footnote_495_495" class="fnanchor">[495]</a><br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>It was no doubt the spirit of renewed confidence -which led Hezekiah to undertake his one military -enterprise—the chastisement of the long-troublesome -Philistines. He was entirely successful. He not only -won back the cities which his father had lost,<a name="FNanchor_496_496" id="FNanchor_496_496"></a><a href="#Footnote_496_496" class="fnanchor">[496]</a> but -he also dispossessed them of their own cities, even -unto Gaza, which was their southernmost possession—"from -the tower of the watchman to the fenced city."<a name="FNanchor_497_497" id="FNanchor_497_497"></a><a href="#Footnote_497_497" class="fnanchor">[497]</a> -There can be no doubt that this act involved an almost<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_296" id="Page_296">[Pg 296]</a></span> -open defiance of the Assyrian King; but if Hezekiah -dreamed of independence, it was essential for him to be -free from the raids and the menace of a neighbour so -dangerous as Philistia, and so inveterately hostile. It -is not improbable that he may have devoted to this war -the money which would otherwise have gone to pay -the tribute to Shalmaneser or Sargon, which had been -continued since the date of the appeal of Ahaz to -Tiglath-Pileser II. When Sargon applied for the -tribute Hezekiah refused it, and even omitted to send -the customary present.</p> - -<p>It is clear that in this line of conduct the king -was following the exhortations of Isaiah. It showed no -small firmness of character that he was able to choose -a decided course amid the chaos of contending counsels. -Nothing but a most heroic courage could have enabled -him, at any period of his reign, to defy that dark cloud -of Assyrian war which ever loomed on the horizon, and -from which but little sufficed to elicit the destructive -lightning-flash.</p> - -<p>There were three permanent parties in the Court of -Hezekiah, each incessantly trying to sway the king to -its own counsels, and each representing those counsels -as indispensable to the happiness, and even to the -existence, of the State.</p> - -<p>I. There was the Assyrian party, urging with natural -vehemence that the fierce northern king was as irresistible -in power as he was terrible in vengeance. The -fearful cruelties which had been committed at Beth-Arbel, -the devastation and misery of the Trans-Jordanic -tribes, the obliteration and deportation of the heavily -afflicted districts of Zebulon, Naphtali, and the way -of the sea in Galilee of the nations, the already inevitable -and imminent destruction of Samaria and her<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_297" id="Page_297">[Pg 297]</a></span> -king and the whole Northern Kingdom, together with -that certain deportation of its inhabitants of which the -fatal policy had been established by Tiglath-Pileser, -would constitute weighty arguments against resistance. -Such considerations would appeal powerfully to the -panic of the despondent section of the community, which -was only actuated, as most men are, by considerations -of ordinary political expediency. The foul apparition -of the Ninevites, which for five centuries afflicted the -nations, is now only visible to us in the bas-reliefs and -inscriptions unearthed from their burnt palaces. There -they live before us in their own sculptures, with their -"thickset, sensual figures," and the expression of calm -and settled ferocity on their faces, exhibiting a frightful -nonchalance as they look on at the infliction of diabolical -atrocities upon their vanquished enemies. But in the -eighth century before Christ they were visible to all the -eastern world in the exuberance of the most brutal -parts of the nature of man. Men had heard how, a -century earlier, Assurnazipal boasted that he had -"dyed the mountains of the Nairi with blood like -wool"; how he had flayed captive kings alive, and -dressed pillars with their skins; how he had walled -up others alive, or impaled them on stakes; how he -had burnt boys and girls alive, put out eyes, cut off -hands, feet, ears, and noses, pulled out the tongues of -his enemies, and "at the command of Assur his god" -had flung their limbs to vultures and eagles, to dogs -and bears. The Jews, too, must have realised with a -vividness which is to us impossible the cruel nature of -the usurper Sargon. He is represented on his monuments -as putting out with his own hands the eyes of -his miserable captives; while, to prevent them from -flinching when the spear which he holds in his hand<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_298" id="Page_298">[Pg 298]</a></span> -is plunged into their eye-sockets, a hook is inserted -through their nose and lips and held fast with a bridle. -Can we not imagine the pathos with which this party -would depict such horrors to the tremblers of Judah? -Would they not bewail the fanaticism which led the -prophets to seduce their king into the suicidal policy -of defying such a power? To these men the sole path -of national safety lay in continuing to be quiet vassals -and faithful tributaries of these destroyers of cities and -treaders-down of foes.</p> - -<p>II. Then there was the Egyptian party, headed probably -by the powerful Shebna, the chancellor.<a name="FNanchor_498_498" id="FNanchor_498_498"></a><a href="#Footnote_498_498" class="fnanchor">[498]</a> His -foreign name, the fact that his father is not mentioned, -and the question of Isaiah—"What hast thou here? -and whom hast thou here, that thou hast hewed thee -out a sepulchre here?"—seem to indicate that he was -by birth a foreigner, perhaps a Syrian.<a name="FNanchor_499_499" id="FNanchor_499_499"></a><a href="#Footnote_499_499" class="fnanchor">[499]</a> The prophet, -indignant at his powerful interference with domestic -politics, threatens him, in words of tremendous energy, -with exile and degradation.<a name="FNanchor_500_500" id="FNanchor_500_500"></a><a href="#Footnote_500_500" class="fnanchor">[500]</a> He lost his place of -chancellor, and we next find him in the inferior, -though still honourable, office of secretary (<i>sopher</i>, -2 Kings xviii. 18), while Eliakim had been promoted -to his vacant place (Isa. xxii. 21). Perhaps he may -have afterwards repented, and the doom have been<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_299" id="Page_299">[Pg 299]</a></span> -lightened.<a name="FNanchor_501_501" id="FNanchor_501_501"></a><a href="#Footnote_501_501" class="fnanchor">[501]</a> Circumstances at any rate reduced him -from the scornful spirit which seems to have marked -his earlier opposition to the prophetic counsels, and -perhaps the powerful warning and menace of Isaiah -may have exercised an influence on his mind.</p> - -<p>III. The third party, if it could even be called a party, -was that of Isaiah and a few of the faithful, aided -no doubt by the influence of the prophecies of Micah. -Their attitude to both the other parties was antagonistic.</p> - -<p>i. As regards the Assyrian, they did not attempt to -minimise the danger. They represented the peril from -the kingdom of Nineveh as God's appointed scourge -for the transgressions of Judah, as it had been for the -transgressions of Israel.</p> - -<p>Thus Micah sees in imagination the terrible march -of the invader by Gath, Akko, Beth-le-Aphrah, Maroth, -Lachish, and Adullam. He plays with bitter anguish -on the name of each town as an omen of humiliation -and ruin, and calls on Zion to make herself bald for -the children of her delight, and to enlarge her baldness -as the vultures, because they are gone into captivity.<a name="FNanchor_502_502" id="FNanchor_502_502"></a><a href="#Footnote_502_502" class="fnanchor">[502]</a> -He turns fiercely on the greedy grandees, the false -prophets, the blood-stained princes, the hireling -priests, the bribe-taking soothsayers, who were responsible -for the guilt which should draw down the -vengeance. He ends with the fearful prophecy—which -struck a chill into men's hearts a century later, and -had an important influence on Jewish history—"Therefore, -because of you shall Zion be ploughed as a field,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_300" id="Page_300">[Pg 300]</a></span> -and Jerusalem become ruins, and the hill of the Temple -as heights in the wood";—though there should be an -ultimate deliverance from Migdal-Eder, and a remnant -should be saved.<a name="FNanchor_503_503" id="FNanchor_503_503"></a><a href="#Footnote_503_503" class="fnanchor">[503]</a></p> - -<p>Similar to Micah's, and possibly not uninfluenced -by it, is Isaiah's imaginary picture of the march of -Assyria, which must have been full of terror to the -poor inhabitants of Jerusalem.<a name="FNanchor_504_504" id="FNanchor_504_504"></a><a href="#Footnote_504_504" class="fnanchor">[504]</a></p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i6">"He is come to Aiath!<br /></span> -<span class="i7">He is passed through Migron!<br /></span> -<span class="i7">At Michmash he layeth up his baggage:<br /></span> -<span class="i7">They are gone over the pass:<br /></span> -<span class="i7">'Geba,' they cry, 'is our lodging.'<br /></span> -<span class="i7">Ramah trembleth:<br /></span> -<span class="i7">Gibeah of Saul is fled!<br /></span> -<span class="i7">Raise thy shrill cries, O daughter of Gallim!<br /></span> -<span class="i7">Hearken, O Laishah! Answer her, O Anathoth!<br /></span> -<span class="i7">Madmenah is in wild flight (?).<br /></span> -<span class="i7">The inhabitants of Gebim gather their stuff to flee.<br /></span> -<span class="i7">This very day shall he halt at Nob.<br /></span> -<span class="i0">He shaketh his hand at the mount of the daughter of Zion,<br /></span> -<span class="i7">The hill of Jerusalem."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>Yet Isaiah, and the little band of prophets, in spite -of their perils, did <i>not</i> share the views of the Assyrian -party or counsel submission. On the contrary, even -as they contemplate in imagination this terrific march -of Sargon, they threaten Assyria. The Assyrian might -smite Judah, but God should smite the Assyrians. He -boasts that he will rifle the riches of the people as one -robs the eggs of a trembling bird, which does not dare<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_301" id="Page_301">[Pg 301]</a></span> -to cheep or move the wing.<a name="FNanchor_505_505" id="FNanchor_505_505"></a><a href="#Footnote_505_505" class="fnanchor">[505]</a> But Isaiah tells him -that he is but the axe boasting against the hewer, and -the wooden staff lifting itself up against its wielder. -Burning should be scattered over his glory. The -Lord of hosts should lop his boughs with terror, and -a mighty one should hew down the crashing forest of -his haughty Lebanon.</p> - -<p>ii. Still more indignant were the true prophets -against those who trusted in an alliance with Egypt. -From first to last Isaiah warned Ahaz, and warned -Hezekiah, that no reliance was to be placed on Egyptian -promises—that Egypt was but like the reed of his own -Nile. He mocked the hopes placed on Egyptian intervention -as being no less sure of disannulment than a -covenant with death and an agreement with Sheol. -This rebellious reliance on the shadow of Egypt was -but the weaving of an unrighteous web, and the adding -of sin to sin. It should lead to nothing but shame -and confusion, and the Jewish ambassadors to Zoan -and Egypt should only have to blush for a people -that could neither help nor profit. And then branding -Egypt with the old insulting name of Rahab, or -"Blusterer," he says,—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Egypt helpeth in vain, and to no purpose.<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Therefore have I called her 'Rahab, that sitteth still.'"<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>Indolent braggart—that was the only designation which -she deserved! Intrigue and braggadocio—smoke and -lukewarm water,—this was all which could be expected -from <i>her</i>!<a name="FNanchor_506_506" id="FNanchor_506_506"></a><a href="#Footnote_506_506" class="fnanchor">[506]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_302" id="Page_302">[Pg 302]</a></span></p> - -<p>Such teaching was eminently distasteful to the -worldly politicians, who regarded faith in Jehovah's -intervention as no better than ridiculous fanaticism, -and forgot God's wisdom in the inflated self-satisfaction -of their own. The priests—luxurious, drunken, scornful—were -naturally with them. Men were fine and -stylish, and in their religious criticisms could not -express too lofty a contempt for any one who, like -Isaiah, was too sincere to care for the mere polishing -of phrases, and too much in earnest to shrink from -reiteration. In their self-indulgent banquets these -sleek, smug euphemists made themselves very merry -over Isaiah's simplicity, reiteration, and directness of -expression. With hiccoughing insolence they asked -whether they were to be treated like weaned babes; -and then wagging their heads, as their successors did -at Christ upon the cross, they indulged themselves in -a mimicry, which they regarded as witty, of Isaiah's -style and manner. With him they said it is all,—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Tsav-la-tsav, tsav-la-tsav,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Quav-la-quav, quav-la-quav,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Z'eir sham, Z'eir sham!"—<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>which may be imitated thus:—With him it is always -"Bit and bit, bid and bid, for-bid and for-bid, for<i>bid</i> -and for<i>bid</i>, a lit-tle bit here, a lit-tle bit there."<a name="FNanchor_507_507" id="FNanchor_507_507"></a><a href="#Footnote_507_507" class="fnanchor">[507]</a> -Monosyllable is heaped on monosyllable; and no -doubt the speakers tipsily adopted the tones of fond -mothers addressing their babes and weanlings. Using -the Hebrew words, one of these shameless roysterers -would say, "<i>Tsav-la-tsav, tsav-la-tsav, quav-la-quav, -quav-la-quav, Z'eir sham, Z'eir sham</i>,—that is how that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_303" id="Page_303">[Pg 303]</a></span> -simpleton Isaiah speaks." And then doubtless a -drunken laugh would go round the table, and half a -dozen of them would be saying thus, "<i>Tsav-la-tsav, -tsav-la-tsav</i>," at once. They derided Isaiah just as the -philosophers of Athens derided St. Paul—as a mere <i>spermologos</i>, -"a seed-pecker!"<a name="FNanchor_508_508" id="FNanchor_508_508"></a><a href="#Footnote_508_508" class="fnanchor">[508]</a> or "picker-up of learning's -crumbs." Is all this petty monosyllabism fit teaching -for persons like us? Are we to be taught by copybooks? -Do we need the censorship of this Old -Morality?</p> - -<p>On whom, full of the fire of God, Isaiah turned, and -told these scornful tipsters, who lorded it over God's -heritage in Jerusalem, that, since they disdained his -stammerings, God would teach them by men of strange -lips and alien tongue. They might mimic the style of -the Assyrians also if they liked; but they should fall -backward, and be broken, and snared, and taken.<a name="FNanchor_509_509" id="FNanchor_509_509"></a><a href="#Footnote_509_509" class="fnanchor">[509]</a></p> - -<p>It must not be forgotten that the struggle of the -prophets against these parties was far more severe than -we might suppose. The politicians of expediency had -supporters among the leading princes. The priests—whom -the prophets so constantly and sternly denounce—adhered -to them; and, as usual, the women were all -of the priestly party (comp. Isa. xxxii. 9-20). The -king, indeed, was inclined to side with his prophet, but -the king was terribly overshadowed by a powerful and -worldly aristocracy, of which the influence was almost -always on the side of luxury, idolatry, and oppression.</p> - -<p>iii. But what had Isaiah to offer in the place of the -policy of these worldly and sacerdotal advisers of the -king? It was the simple command "Trust in the Lord." -It was the threefold message "God is high; God is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_304" id="Page_304">[Pg 304]</a></span> -near; God is Love."<a name="FNanchor_510_510" id="FNanchor_510_510"></a><a href="#Footnote_510_510" class="fnanchor">[510]</a> Had he not told Ahaz not to fear -the "stumps of two smouldering torches," when Rezin -and Pekah seemed awfully dangerous to Judah? So -he tells them now that, though their sins had necessitated -the rushing stroke of Assyrian judgment, Zion -should not be utterly destroyed. In Isaiah "the calmness -requisite for sagacity rose from faith." Mr. Bagehot -might have appealed to Isaiah's whole policy in illustration -of what he has so well described as the military -and political benefits of religion. Monotheism is of -advantage to men not only "by reason of the high -concentration of steady feeling which it produces, -but also for the mental calmness and sagacity which -surely springs from a pure and vivid conviction that -the Lord reigneth."<a name="FNanchor_511_511" id="FNanchor_511_511"></a><a href="#Footnote_511_511" class="fnanchor">[511]</a> Isaiah's whole conviction might -have been summed up in the name of the king himself: -"Jehovah maketh strong."</p> - -<p>King Hezekiah, apparently not a man of much personal -force, though of sincere piety, was naturally -distracted by the counsels of these three parties: and -who can judge him severely if, beset with such terrific -dangers, he occasionally wavered, now to one side, now -to the other? On the whole, it is clear that he was -wise and faithful, and deserves the high eulogy that -his faith failed not. Naturally he had not within his -soul that burning light of inspiration which made Isaiah -so sure that, even though clouds and darkness might -lower on every side, God was an eternal Sun, which -flamed for ever in the zenith, even when not visible -to any eye save that of Faith.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_305" id="Page_305">[Pg 305]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXVI" id="CHAPTER_XXVI">CHAPTER XXVI</a></h2> - -<h3><i>HEZEKIAH'S SICKNESS, AND THE EMBASSY FROM -BABYLON</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xx. 1-19</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"Thou hast loved me out of the pit of nothingness."—<span class="smcap">Isa.</span> xxxviii. 17 -(A.V., margin).</p></blockquote> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"See the shadow of the dial<br /></span> -<span class="i0">In the lot of every one<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Marks the passing of the trial,<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Proves the presence of the Sun."<br /></span> -<span class="i26"><span class="smcap">E. B. Browning.</span><br /></span> -</div></div> - - -<p>In the chaos of uncertainties which surrounds the -chronology of King Hezekiah's reign, it is impossible -to fix a precise date to the sickness which almost -brought him to the grave. It has, however, been conjectured -by some Assyriologists that the story of this -episode has been displaced, because it seemed to break -the continuity of the narrative of the Assyrian invasion; -and that, though it is placed in the Book of Kings after -the deliverance from Sennacherib, it really followed the -earlier incursion of Sargon. This is rendered more -probable by Isaiah's promise (2 Kings xx. 6), "I will -deliver thee and this city out of the hand of the King -of Assyria," and by the fact that Hezekiah still possessed -such numerous and splendid treasures to display -to the ambassadors of Merodach-Baladan. This could -hardly have been the case after he had been forced to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_306" id="Page_306">[Pg 306]</a></span> -pay a fine to the King of Assyria of all the silver that -was found in the house of the Lord, and in the -treasures of the king's house, to cut off the gold from -the doors and pillars of the Temple, and even to send -as captives to Nineveh some of his wives, and of the -eunuchs of his palace.<a name="FNanchor_512_512" id="FNanchor_512_512"></a><a href="#Footnote_512_512" class="fnanchor">[512]</a> The date "in those days" -(2 Kings xx. 1) is vague and elastic, and may apply -to any time before or after the great invasion.</p> - -<p>He was sick unto death. The only indication which -we have of the nature of his illness is that it took the -form of a carbuncle or imposthume,<a name="FNanchor_513_513" id="FNanchor_513_513"></a><a href="#Footnote_513_513" class="fnanchor">[513]</a> which could be -locally treated, but which, in days of very imperfect -therapeutic knowledge, might easily end in death, especially -if it were on the back of the neck. The conjecture -of Witsius and others that it was a form of the plague -which they suppose to have caused the disaster to the -Assyrian army has nothing whatever to recommend it.</p> - -<p>Seeing the fatal character of his illness, Isaiah came -to the king with the dark message, "Set thine house in -order; for thou shalt die, and not live."</p> - -<p>The message is interesting as furnishing yet another -proof that even the most positive announcements of the -prophets were, and were always meant to be, to some -extent hypothetical and dependent on unexpressed -conditions. This was the case with the famous prophecy -of Micah that Zion should be ploughed down into -a heap of ruins. It was never fulfilled; yet the prophet -lost none of his authority, for it was well understood<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_307" id="Page_307">[Pg 307]</a></span> -that the doom which would otherwise have been carried -out had been averted by timely penitence.</p> - -<p>But the message of Isaiah fell with terrible anguish -on the heart of the suffering king. He had hoped for -a better fate. He had begun a great religious reformation. -He had uplifted his people, at least in part, out -of the moral slough into which they had fallen in the -days of his predecessor. He had inspired into his -threatened capital something of his own faith and -courage. Surely he, if any man, might claim the old -promises which Jehovah in His loving-kindness and -truth had sworn to his father David and his father -Abraham, that he being delivered out of the hand of his -enemies should serve God without fear, walking in -holiness and righteousness before Him all the days of -his life. He was but a young man still—perhaps not -yet thirty years old; further, not only would he leave -behind him an unfinished work, but he was childless,<a name="FNanchor_514_514" id="FNanchor_514_514"></a><a href="#Footnote_514_514" class="fnanchor">[514]</a> -and therefore it seemed as if with him would end the -direct line of the house of David, heir to so many -precious promises. He has left us—it is preserved in -the Book of Isaiah—the poem which he wrote on his -recovery, but which enshrines the emotion of his -agonising anticipations<a name="FNanchor_515_515" id="FNanchor_515_515"></a><a href="#Footnote_515_515" class="fnanchor">[515]</a>:—</p> - -<p> -"I said, In the noontide of my days I shall go into the gates of Sheol.<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I am deprived of the residue of my years.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I said, I shall not see Yah, Yah, in the land of the living,</span><br /> -<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_308" id="Page_308">[Pg 308]</a></span><span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I shall behold no man more, when I am among them that cease to be.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Mine habitation is removed, and is carried away from me like a shepherd's tent.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Like a weaver I have rolled up my life; he will cut me from the thrum.</span></p> -<hr class="hr2" /> -<p><span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Like a swallow or a crane, so did I chatter;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">I did mourn as a dove; mine eyes fail with looking upward.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">O Lord, I am oppressed; be Thou my surety."</span><br /> -</p> - -<p>We must remember, as we contemplate his utter -prostration of soul, that he was not blessed, as we are, -with the sure and certain hope of the resurrection to -eternal life. All was dim and dark, to him in the shadowy -world of <i>eidola</i> beyond the grave, and many a century -was to elapse before Christ brought life and immortality -to light. To enter Sheol meant to Hezekiah to -pass beyond the cheerful sunshine of earth and the -felt presence of God. No more worship, no more -gladness there!</p> - -<p> -"For Sheol cannot praise Thee, Death cannot celebrate Thee;<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">They that go down into the pit cannot hope for Thy truth."</span><br /> -</p> - -<p>On every ground, therefore, the feelings of Hezekiah, -had he not been a worshipper of God, might have -been like those of Mycerinus, and, like that legendary -Egyptian king, he might have cursed God before he died.</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"My father loved injustice, and lived long;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">I loved the good he scorned and hated wrong—<br /></span> -<span class="i1">The gods declare my recompense to-day.<br /></span> -<span class="i1">I looked for life more lasting, rule more high;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">And when six years are measured, lo, I die!<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Yet surely, O my people, did I ween<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Man's justice from the all-just gods was given,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">A light that from some upper point did beam,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Some better archetype whose seat was heaven:<br /></span> -<span class="i1">A light that, shining from the blest abodes,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Did shadow somewhat of the life of gods."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>The indignation of Mycerinus often finds an echo on<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_309" id="Page_309">[Pg 309]</a></span> -Pagan tombstones, as in the famous epitaph on the -grave of the girl Procope:—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"I, Procope, lift up my hands against the gods,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Who took me hence undeserving,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Aged nineteen years."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>It was far otherwise with Hezekiah. There was -anguish in his heart, but no rebellion or defiance. He -wept sore; he turned his face to the wall and wept;<a name="FNanchor_516_516" id="FNanchor_516_516"></a><a href="#Footnote_516_516" class="fnanchor">[516]</a> -but as he wept he also prayed, and said,—</p> - -<p>"O Lord, remember now how I have walked before -Thee in truth, and with a perfect heart, and have done -that which is good in Thy sight."</p> - -<p>Isaiah, after delivering his dark message, and doubtless -adding to it such words of human consolation as -were possible—if under such circumstances any were -possible—had left the king's chamber. On every -ground his feelings must have been almost as overwhelmed -with sorrow as those of the king. Hezekiah -was personally his friend, and the hope of his nation. -Doubtless the prophet's prayers rose as fervently and -as effectually as those of Luther, which snatched his -friend Melanchthon back from the very gates of death. -By the time that he had reached the middle of the -court,<a name="FNanchor_517_517" id="FNanchor_517_517"></a><a href="#Footnote_517_517" class="fnanchor">[517]</a> he felt borne in upon him, by that Divine<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_310" id="Page_310">[Pg 310]</a></span> -intuition which constituted his prophetic call, the certainty -that God would withdraw the immediate doom -which he had been commissioned to announce. It has -been conjectured by some that the conviction was -deepened in his mind by observing on the steps of Ahaz -one of those remarkable but rare effects of refraction—or, -as some have conjectured, of a solar eclipse, involving -an obscuration of the upper limb of the sun—which -had seemed to take the advancing shadow ten steps -backwards; and that this was to him a sign from -heaven of the promise of God and the prolongation of -the king's life. Awestruck and glad, he hastened back -into the presence of the dying king with the life-giving -message that God had heard his prayer, and seen his -tears, and would add fifteen years to his life, and would -defend him, and deliver him and Jerusalem out of the -hand of the King of Assyria. And this should be the -sign to him from Jehovah—Jehovah would bring again -the shadow ten steps up the stairs of Ahaz. To this -sign—if it was visible from the chamber-window—he -called the attention of the astonished king.<a name="FNanchor_518_518" id="FNanchor_518_518"></a><a href="#Footnote_518_518" class="fnanchor">[518]</a></p> - -<p>We here naturally follow the narrative of Isaiah -himself, as more authoritative than that of the historian -of the Kings as to details in which they differ.<a name="FNanchor_519_519" id="FNanchor_519_519"></a><a href="#Footnote_519_519" class="fnanchor">[519]</a> Not -only is it quite in accordance with all that we know -of history that slight variations should occur in the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_311" id="Page_311">[Pg 311]</a></span> -traditions of long-past times, but the text of the Book -of Kings suggests some difficulty. There we read that -Hezekiah asked Isaiah what should be the sign of the -promise—not mentioned in Isaiah—that he should go -up to the House of the Lord the third day. Isaiah -then asked him whether the sign should be that the -shadow should advance ten steps, or recede ten steps. -But there is no interrogation in the Hebrew, which -rather means, "The shadow hath advanced ten steps -... if it shall recede ten steps?" or if we insert the -interrogation in the first clause, "Hath the shadow -advanced ten steps?"<a name="FNanchor_520_520" id="FNanchor_520_520"></a><a href="#Footnote_520_520" class="fnanchor">[520]</a> The king's natural answer to -so strange an alternative would be that for the shadow -to advance ten steps was nothing; whereas its retrogression -would be a sign indeed. Then Isaiah cried -unto Jehovah, and the shadow went backward. In -the obvious divergence of details we naturally follow -Isaiah himself; and if it be a true and understood rule -of all theology, "<i>Miracula non sunt multiplicanda prter -necessitatem</i>," the miracle in this case—in the opportuneness -of its occurrence, and the issues which it -inspired—was none the less a miracle because it was -carried out in direct accordance with God's unseen, -perpetual, miraculous Providence, which none but -unbelievers will nickname Chance. That we are here -dealing with an historic incident is certain; and they -who see and acknowledge God in all history find no -difficulty at all in seeing His dealings with men in -striking interpositions. But these, by the analogy of -His whole Divine economy, would naturally be -out in accordance with natural laws.</p> - -<p>The words rendered "the sun-dial of Ahaz" mean -no more than "the steps [<i>ma'aloth</i>] of Ahaz." Ahaz<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_312" id="Page_312">[Pg 312]</a></span> -evidently was a king of sthetic tastes, who was fond -of introducing foreign novelties and curiosities into -Jerusalem.<a name="FNanchor_521_521" id="FNanchor_521_521"></a><a href="#Footnote_521_521" class="fnanchor">[521]</a> Steps, with a staff on the top of them as -a gnomon, to serve as sun-dials had been invented -at Babylon, and Ahaz may probably have become -acquainted with their form and use when he paid his -visit to Tiglath-Pileser at Damascus. No one could -blame him—it was indeed a meritorious act—to introduce -to his people so useful an invention. The word -"hour" first occurs in Dan. iii. 6, and it was doubtless -from Babylon that the Hebrews borrowed the division -of days into hours. This is the earliest instance in -the Bible of the mention of any instrument to measure -time. That the recession of the shadow could be -caused by refraction is certain, for it has been observed -in modern days. Thus, as is mentioned by Rosenmller, -on March 27th, 1703, Pre Romauld, prior of the -monastery at Metz, noticed that the shadow on his dial -deviated an hour and a half, owing to refraction in the -higher regions of the atmosphere.<a name="FNanchor_522_522" id="FNanchor_522_522"></a><a href="#Footnote_522_522" class="fnanchor">[522]</a> Or again, according -to Mr. Bosanquet, the same effect might have been -produced by the darkening shadow of an eclipse. But -while he appealed to Divine indications the great -prophet did not neglect natural remedies. He ordered -that a cake of figs should be laid on the imposthume. -It was a recognised and an efficient remedy, still -recommended, centuries later, by Dioscorides, by Pliny, -and by St. Jerome. By God's blessing on man's -therapeutic care, the king was speedily rescued from -the gates of death. Constantly in Scripture what we -call the miraculous and what we call the providential -are mingled together. To those who regard the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_313" id="Page_313">[Pg 313]</a></span> -providential as a constant miracle, the question of the -miraculous becomes subordinate.<a name="FNanchor_523_523" id="FNanchor_523_523"></a><a href="#Footnote_523_523" class="fnanchor">[523]</a></p> - -<p>With intense joy and gratitude the king hailed the -respite which God had granted him. In fifteen years -much might be done, much might be hoped for. All -this he acknowledged with deep feeling in the song -which he wrote on his recovery.</p> - -<p> -"I shall go as in solemn procession<a name="FNanchor_524_524" id="FNanchor_524_524"></a><a href="#Footnote_524_524" class="fnanchor">[524]</a> all my years because of the bitterness of my soul.<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">O Lord, by these things men live,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And wholly therein is the life of my spirit.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Behold, it was for my peace that I had great bitterness;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">But Thou hast loved my soul from the pit of nothingness:</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">For Thou hast cast all my sins behind Thy back.</span></p> -<hr class="hr2" /> -<p><span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">The Lord is ready to save me;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Therefore will we sing my songs to the stringed instruments</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">All the days of our life in the house of the Lord."<a name="FNanchor_525_525" id="FNanchor_525_525"></a><a href="#Footnote_525_525" class="fnanchor">[525]</a></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>"The wonder done in the land" was, according to -the Chronicler, one of the grounds for the embassy -which, after his recovery, Hezekiah received from -Merodach-Baladan, the patriot prince of Babylon. The -other ostensible object of the embassy was to send -letters and a present in congratulation for the king's -restoration to health. But the real object lay deeper, -out of sight. It was to secure a southern alliance for -Babylon against the incessant tyranny of Nineveh.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_314" id="Page_314">[Pg 314]</a></span></p> - -<p>Merodach-Baladan is mentioned in the inscriptions of -Sargon.<a name="FNanchor_526_526" id="FNanchor_526_526"></a><a href="#Footnote_526_526" class="fnanchor">[526]</a> He is described as "Merodach-Baladan, son -of Baladan, King of Sumr and Accad, king of the four -countries, and conqueror of all his enemies." There -had been long struggles, lasting indeed for centuries, -between the city on the Euphrates and the city on the -Tigris. Sometimes one, sometimes the other, had been -victorious. Babylon—on the monuments Kur-Dunyash—had -its original Accadian name of Ca-dinirra, which, -like its Semitic equivalent Bal-el, means "Gate of God." -Kalah (Larissa and Birs Nimroud) had been built by -Shalmaneser I. before <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 1300. His son conquered -Babylon, but not permanently; for in some later raid -the Babylonians got possession of his signet-ring, with -its proud inscription, "Conqueror of Kur-Dunyash," -and it was not recovered by the Assyrians till six -centuries later, when it fell into the hands of Sennacherib. -About 1150 Nebuchadrezzar I. of Babylon -thrice invaded Assyria, but there was again peace -and alliance in 1100. Merodach-Baladan I. reigned -before 900. The king who now sought the friendship -of Hezekiah was the second of the name. He seized -or recovered the throne of Babylon in 721, after the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_315" id="Page_315">[Pg 315]</a></span> -death of Shalmaneser, perhaps because Sargon was a -usurper of dubious descent. He helped the Elamites -against Assyria. Sargon was compelled to retreat to -Assyria, but returned in 712, and drove Merodach-Baladan -to flight. He was captured and taken to -Assyria. But on the murder of Sargon in 705, he -again managed to seize the throne of Babylon, killed -the viceroy who had been set up, and became king -for six months. After this, Sennacherib invaded his -country, defeated him, and drove him once more to -flight. He was perhaps killed by his successor.</p> - -<p>Whether his overtures to Hezekiah took place before -his defeat by Sargon, or after his escape, is uncertain. -In either case he doubtless sent a splendid embassy, -for Babylon was far-famed for its golden magnificence -as "the glory of kingdoms" and "the beauty of the -Chaldees' excellency."<a name="FNanchor_527_527" id="FNanchor_527_527"></a><a href="#Footnote_527_527" class="fnanchor">[527]</a> At that time the Jews knew -but little of the far-off city which was destined to -be so closely interwoven with their future fortunes, -as it was mingled with their oldest and dimmest traditions.<a name="FNanchor_528_528" id="FNanchor_528_528"></a><a href="#Footnote_528_528" class="fnanchor">[528]</a> -Apart from the magnificence of the presents -brought to him, it was not unnatural that Hezekiah -should regard this embassy with intense satisfaction. -It was flattering to the power of his little kingdom that -its alliance should be sought by the far-off and powerful -capital on the great river;<a name="FNanchor_529_529" id="FNanchor_529_529"></a><a href="#Footnote_529_529" class="fnanchor">[529]</a> it was still more encouraging -to know that the frightful Nineveh had a strong enemy -not far from her own frontier. Merodach-Baladan's ambassadors -would be sure to inform Hezekiah that their -lord had flung off the authority of Sargon, had kept -him at bay for many years, and was still the undisputed<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_316" id="Page_316">[Pg 316]</a></span> -king of the dominions snatched from the common enemy. -It might have seemed reasonable that Hezekiah, for his -part, should desire to leave the most favourable impression -of his wealth and power on the mind of his -distant and magnificent ally. He "hearkened unto" -the ambassadors, or, more properly, "he was glad of -them" (R.V.),<a name="FNanchor_530_530" id="FNanchor_530_530"></a><a href="#Footnote_530_530" class="fnanchor">[530]</a> and "showed them all the house of his -spicery and other treasures, his precious unguents, his -armoury, his bullion, plate, and the whole resources -of his kingdom." The Chronicler regards this as -ingratitude to God. He says that "Hezekiah rendered -not again according unto the benefits done unto him; -for his heart was lifted up: therefore there was wrath -upon him, and upon Judah and Jerusalem." It is a -severe judgment of later times, and the historian of -the Kings pronounces no such censure. Nevertheless, -he records the stern sentence pronounced by Isaiah. -The prophet had seen through the secret diplomacy -of the Babylonian ambassadors, and knew that the real -object of their mission was to induce his king to revolt -against Assyria in reliance on an arm of flesh. He -came to ask Hezekiah whose these men were, whence -they came, and what they had said. The king told -him who they were, and how he had received them; -but he did not think it wise to reveal their secret -proposals. If Isaiah had so vehemently reproved all -negotiations with Egypt, there was little probability -that he would sanction the overtures of Babylon. He -saw in Hezekiah's conduct a vein of ostentatious -elation, a swerving from theocratic faith; and with -remarkable prophetic insight convinced the king of the -error and impolicy of his proceedings, by announcing -that the final and, in fact, irrevocable captivity of Judah<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_317" id="Page_317">[Pg 317]</a></span> -would ultimately come, not from Nineveh, the fierce -enemy, whose cloud of war was lurid on the horizon, -but from Babylon, the apparently weaker friend, who -was now making overtures of amity. With what -heartrending grief must the king have heard the doom -that the display of his treasures would prove to be in -the future an incentive to the cupidity of the kings of -Babylon, and that they would sweep away all those -precious things to the banks of the Euphrates with -such final overthrow that even the descendants of -David should be sunk to the infinite degradation of -being eunuchs in the palace of the King of Babylon.<a name="FNanchor_531_531" id="FNanchor_531_531"></a><a href="#Footnote_531_531" class="fnanchor">[531]</a> -The doom seems to have been fulfilled in part in the -reign of Hezekiah's son, and more fearfully in the days -of his great-grandchildren.<a name="FNanchor_532_532" id="FNanchor_532_532"></a><a href="#Footnote_532_532" class="fnanchor">[532]</a></p> - -<p>The king's pride was humbled to the dust. In the -spirit of Job—"The Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken -away; blessed be the name of the Lord"<a name="FNanchor_533_533" id="FNanchor_533_533"></a><a href="#Footnote_533_533" class="fnanchor">[533]</a>—he resigned -himself without a murmur to the will of Heaven, and -exclaimed that all which God did must be well done. -At least God granted him a respite. Peace and truth -would be in his own days; for that let him be thankful. -They were words of humble resignation, uttered by one -who had learnt to believe that whatever God decreed -was just and right.</p> - -<p>It would be unjust to measure the feelings of those -far centuries by those of our own day, and there was -none of the gross selfishness in the words of Hezekiah -which led Nero to quote the line—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"When I am dead, let earth be mixed with fire";<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>or which led Louis XIV. to say—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Aprs moi le dluge."<br /></span> -</div></div> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_318" id="Page_318">[Pg 318]</a></span></p> -<p>We may perhaps trace in his exclamation something of -the fatalism which gives a touch of apathy to the submissiveness -of the Oriental. Some, too, have imagined -that his distress was tinged by a gleam of happiness -at the implicit promise that he should have a son. His -wife's name was Hephzibah ("My delight is in her"), -and within two years she brought forth the firstborn -son, whose career, indeed, was dark and evil, but who -became in due time an ancestor of the promised Messiah. -The name "Manasseh" given him by his parents -recalled the child born to Joseph in the land of his -exile who had caused him to forget his sorrows.<a name="FNanchor_534_534" id="FNanchor_534_534"></a><a href="#Footnote_534_534" class="fnanchor">[534]</a> -Hezekiah had the spirit which says,—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"That which Thou blessest is most good,<br /></span> -<span class="i5">And unblest good is ill;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">And all is right which seems most wrong,<br /></span> -<span class="i5">So it be Thy sweet will."<br /></span> -</div></div> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_319" id="Page_319">[Pg 319]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXVII" id="CHAPTER_XXVII">CHAPTER XXVII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>HEZEKIAH AND ASSYRIA</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 701</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xviii. 13—xix. 37.</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>Ἀλλ' ὁ σοφώτατος βασιλεὺς οὐχ ὅπλα ταῖς ἐκείνων βλασφημίαις, ἀλλὰ -προσευχὴν καὶ δάκρυα καὶ σάκκον ἀντέταξεν.—<span class="smcap">Theodoret.</span></p></blockquote> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"When, sudden—how think ye the end?<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Did I say 'without friend'?<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Say rather from marge to blue marge<br /></span> -<span class="i1">The whole sky grew his targe,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">With the sun's self for visible boss,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">While an Arm ran across<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Which the earth heaved beneath like a breast,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Where the wretch was safe pressed."<br /></span> -<span class="i35"><span class="smcap">Browning.</span><br /></span> -</div></div> - - -<p>Although during a few memorable scenes the -relations of Judah with Assyria in the reign of -Hezekiah leap into fierce light, many previous details -are unfortunately left in the deepest obscurity—an -obscurity all the more impenetrable from the lack of -certain dates. It will perhaps help to simplify our conceptions -if we first sketch what is known of Assyria from -the cuneiform inscriptions, and then fill up the sketch -of those scenes which are more minutely delineated in -the Book of Kings and in the prophecies of Isaiah.</p> - -<p>Sargon—perhaps a successful general of royal blood, -though he never calls himself the son of any one<a name="FNanchor_535_535" id="FNanchor_535_535"></a><a href="#Footnote_535_535" class="fnanchor">[535]</a>—seems<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_320" id="Page_320">[Pg 320]</a></span> -to have usurped the throne on the death of -Shalmaneser IV., during the siege of Samaria in <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> -722. He took Samaria, deported its inhabitants, and -repeopled it from the Assyrian dominions. "In their -place," he says, in his tablets in the halls of his palace -at Khorsabad, "I settled the men of countries conquered -[by my hand]."<a name="FNanchor_536_536" id="FNanchor_536_536"></a><a href="#Footnote_536_536" class="fnanchor">[536]</a> In 720 he suppressed a -futile attempt at revolt, headed by a pretender named -Yahubid, in Hamath, which he reduced to "a heap of -ruins." For some years after this he was occupied -mainly on his northern frontiers, but he tells us that -until 711 tribute continued to come in from Judah and -Philistia. Meanwhile, these terrified and oppressed -feudatories, writhing under the remorseless dominion -of Nineveh, naturally began to listen to the intrigues -of Egypt, whose interest it was to create a bulwark -between herself and the invasion of the armies which -were the abhorrence of the world. Under the influence -of Sabaco, which gave new strength and unity to Egypt, -she succeeded in seducing Ashdod from its allegiance to -Sargon. Sargon at once deposed Azuri, King of Ashdod, -and put his brother Ahimit in his place. The -Ashdodites soon after deposed Ahimit, and elected -in his place Jaman, who was in alliance with Sabaco.<a name="FNanchor_537_537" id="FNanchor_537_537"></a><a href="#Footnote_537_537" class="fnanchor">[537]</a> -This revolt was evidently favoured by Judah, Edom, -and Moab; for Sargon says that they, as well as the -people of Philistia, "were speaking treason." The -rebellion was crushed by Sargon's promptitude.<a name="FNanchor_538_538" id="FNanchor_538_538"></a><a href="#Footnote_538_538" class="fnanchor">[538]</a> He -tells his own tale thus:—</p> - -<p>"In the wrath of my heart I did not divide my army, -and I did not diminish the ranks, but I marched against<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_321" id="Page_321">[Pg 321]</a></span> -Ashdod with my warriors, who did not separate themselves -from the traces of my sandals. I besieged, I -took Ashdod and Gunt-Asdodim. I then re-established -these towns. I placed [in them] the people whom my -arms had conquered, I put over them my lieutenant as -governor. I regarded them as Assyrians, and they -practised obedience."<a name="FNanchor_539_539" id="FNanchor_539_539"></a><a href="#Footnote_539_539" class="fnanchor">[539]</a></p> - -<p>Sargon does not, however, seem to have conducted -this campaign in person; for we read in Isa. xx. 1 -that he sent his Turtan—<i>i.e.</i>, his commander-in-chief,<a name="FNanchor_540_540" id="FNanchor_540_540"></a><a href="#Footnote_540_540" class="fnanchor">[540]</a> -whose name seems to have been Zir-bni—to Ashdod, -who fought against it and took it. The wretched -Philistines had put their trust in Sabaco. "The -people," says Sargon, "and their evil chiefs sent their -presents to Pharaoh, King of Egypt, a prince who could -not save them, and besought his alliance." Isaiah had -for three years been indicating how vain this policy was -by one of those acted parables which so powerfully -affect the Eastern mind. He had, by the word of the -Lord, stripped the shoes from on his feet and the upper -robe of sackcloth from his loins, and walked, "naked -and barefoot, for a sign and portent against Egypt and -Ethiopia," to indicate that even thus should the people -of Egypt and Ethiopia be carried away as captives, -naked and barefoot, by the kings of Assyria. Egypt -was the boast of one party at Jerusalem, and Ethiopia, -which had now become master of Egypt under Sabaco, -was their expectation; but Isaiah's public self-humiliation<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_322" id="Page_322">[Pg 322]</a></span> -showed how utterly their hopes should come to -nought.<a name="FNanchor_541_541" id="FNanchor_541_541"></a><a href="#Footnote_541_541" class="fnanchor">[541]</a> Before the outbreak at Ashdod, Sargon had -suppressed a revolt of Hanun, or Hanno, King of Gaza, -and Egypt and Assyria first met face to face at Raphia -(about <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 720), where Sabaco fought in person with -an Egyptian contingent, at a spot half-way between -Gaza and the "river of Egypt."<a name="FNanchor_542_542" id="FNanchor_542_542"></a><a href="#Footnote_542_542" class="fnanchor">[542]</a> Sabaco, whom Sargon -calls "the Sultan of Egypt" (Siltannu Muzri), had been -defeated, and fled precipitately, but Sargon was not then -sufficiently free from other complications to advance to -the Nile. The hoarded vengeance of Assyria was inflicted -upon Egypt nearly a century later by Esarhaddon -and Assurbanipal.</p> - -<p>In the two suppressions of revolt at Ashdod, Sargon -or his Turtan must have come perilously near Jerusalem, -and perhaps he may have inflicted sufficient damage to -admit of the boast that he had "conquered" Juda. -If so, his military vanity made him guilty of an -exaggeration.</p> - -<p>Far more serious to Sargon was the revolt of Merodach-Baladan, -King of Chalda. Babylon had always -been a rival of Nineveh in the competition for world-wide -dominion, and for twelve years, as Sargon says, -Merodach-Baladan had been "sending ambassadors"<a name="FNanchor_543_543" id="FNanchor_543_543"></a><a href="#Footnote_543_543" class="fnanchor">[543]</a>—to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_323" id="Page_323">[Pg 323]</a></span> -Hezekiah among others—in the patient effort to -consolidate a formidable league. Elam and Media were -with him; and at a solemn banquet, for which they had -"spread the carpets,"<a name="FNanchor_544_544" id="FNanchor_544_544"></a><a href="#Footnote_544_544" class="fnanchor">[544]</a> and eaten and drank, the cry -had risen, "Arise, ye princes! anoint the shield." -Standing in ideal vision on his watch-tower, Isaiah saw -the sweeping rush of the Assyrian troops on their -horses and camels on their way to Babylon. What -should come of it? The answer is in the words, -"Fallen, fallen is Babylon, and all the images of her -gods he [Sargon] hath broken to the ground." Alas! -there is no hope from Babylon or its embassy! Would -that Isaiah could have held out a hope! But no, "O my -threshed one, son of my threshing-floor, that which I -have heard from the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel, -that have I declared unto you."<a name="FNanchor_545_545" id="FNanchor_545_545"></a><a href="#Footnote_545_545" class="fnanchor">[545]</a> And so it came to -pass. The brave Babylonian was defeated. In 709 -Sargon occupied his palace, took Dur-yakin, to which he -had fled for refuge, and made himself Lord Paramount -as far as the Persian Gulf. It was his last great enterprise. -He built and adorned his palaces, and looked -forward to long years of peace and splendour; but in -705 the dagger-thrust of an assassin—a malcontent of -the town of Kullum—found its way to his heart; and -Sennacherib reigned in his stead.</p> - -<p>Sennacherib—Sin-ahi-irba ("Sin, the moon-god, has<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_324" id="Page_324">[Pg 324]</a></span> -multiplied brothers")<a name="FNanchor_546_546" id="FNanchor_546_546"></a><a href="#Footnote_546_546" class="fnanchor">[546]</a>—was one of the haughtiest, most -splendid, and most powerful of all the kings of Assyria, -though the petty state of Judah, relying on her God, -defied and flouted him. The son of a mighty conqueror, -at the head of a magnificent army, he regarded himself -as the undisputed lord of the world.<a name="FNanchor_547_547" id="FNanchor_547_547"></a><a href="#Footnote_547_547" class="fnanchor">[547]</a> Born in the -purple, and bred up as crown prince, his primary -characteristic was an overweening pride and arrogance, -which shows itself in all his inscriptions. He calls -himself "the Great King, the Powerful King, the King -of the Assyrians, of the nations of the four regions, -the diligent ruler, the favourite of the Great Gods, the -observer of sworn faith, the guardian of law, the establisher -of monuments, the noble hero, the strong -warrior, the first of kings, the punisher of unbelievers, -the destroyer of wicked men."<a name="FNanchor_548_548" id="FNanchor_548_548"></a><a href="#Footnote_548_548" class="fnanchor">[548]</a> He was mighty both -in war and peace. His warlike glories are attested by -Herodotus, by Polyhistor, by Abydenus, by Demetrius, -and by his own annals. His peaceful triumphs are -attested by the great palace which he erected at Nineveh, -and the magnificent series of sculptured slabs with -which he adorned it; by his canals and aqueducts, his -gateways and embankments, his Bavian sculpture, and -his <i>stl</i> at the Nahr-el-Kelb. He was a worthy successor<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_325" id="Page_325">[Pg 325]</a></span> -of his father Sargon, and of the second Tiglath-Pileser—active -in his military enterprises, indefatigable, -persevering, full of resource.<a name="FNanchor_549_549" id="FNanchor_549_549"></a><a href="#Footnote_549_549" class="fnanchor">[549]</a></p> - -<p>On one of his bas-reliefs we see this magnificent -potentate seated on his throne, holding two arrows in -his right hand, while his left grasps the bow. A rich -bracelet clasps each of his brawny arms. On his head -is the jewelled pyramidal crown of Assyria, with its -embroidered lappets. His dark locks stream down over -his shoulders, and the long, curled beard flows over his -breast. His strongly marked, sensual features wear an -aspect of unearthly haughtiness. He is clad in superbly -broidered robes, and his throne is covered with rich -tapestries, and bas-reliefs of Assyrians or captives, who, -like the Greek caryatides, uphold its divisions with their -heads and arms.</p> - -<p>Yet all this glory faded into darkness, and all this -colossal pride crumbled into dust. Sennacherib not -only died, like his father, by murder, but by the -murderous hands of his own sons, and after the -shattering of all his immense pretensions—a defeated -and dishonoured man.</p> - -<p>One of his invasions of Juda occupies a large part -of the Scripture narrative.<a name="FNanchor_550_550" id="FNanchor_550_550"></a><a href="#Footnote_550_550" class="fnanchor">[550]</a> It was the fourth time -of that terrible contact between the great world-power -which symbolised all that was tyrannic and idolatrous, -and the insignificant tribe which God had chosen for -His own inheritance.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_326" id="Page_326">[Pg 326]</a></span></p> - -<p>In the reign of Ahaz, about <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 732, Judah had -come into collision with Tiglath-Pileser II.</p> - -<p>Under Shalmaneser IV. and Sargon, the Northern -Kingdom had ceased to exist in 722.</p> - -<p>Under Sargon, Judah had been harassed and humbled, -and had witnessed the suppression of the Philistian -revolt, and of the defeat of the powerful Sabaco at -Raphia about 720.</p> - -<p>Now came the fourth and most overwhelming calamity. -If the patriots of Jerusalem had placed any hopes in -the disappearance of the ferocious Sargon, they must -speedily have recognised that he had left behind him a -no less terrible successor.</p> - -<p>Sennacherib reigned apparently twenty-four years -(<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 705-681). On his accession he placed a brother, -whose name is unknown, on the vice-regal throne of -Babylon, and contented himself with the title of King -of the Assyrians. This brother was speedily dethroned -by a usurper named Hagisa, who only reigned thirty -days, and was then slain by the indefatigable Merodach-Baladan, -who held the throne for six months. He was -driven out by Belibus, who had been trained "like a -little dog" in the palace of Nineveh,<a name="FNanchor_551_551" id="FNanchor_551_551"></a><a href="#Footnote_551_551" class="fnanchor">[551]</a> but was now -made King of Sumr and Accad—<i>i.e.</i>, of Babylonia. -Sennacherib entered the palace of Babylon and carried -off the wife of Merodach and endless spoil in triumph, -while Merodach fled into the land of Guzumman, and -(like the Duke of Monmouth) hid himself "among the -marshes and reeds," where the Assyrians searched for -him for five days, but found no trace of him. After -three years (702-699) Belibus proved faithless, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_327" id="Page_327">[Pg 327]</a></span> -Sennacherib made his son Assur-nadin-sum viceroy -of Babylon.</p> - -<p>His second campaign was against the Medes in -Northern Elam.</p> - -<p>His third (701) was against the Khatti (the Hittites)—<i>i.e.</i>, -against Phœnicia and Palestine.<a name="FNanchor_552_552" id="FNanchor_552_552"></a><a href="#Footnote_552_552" class="fnanchor">[552]</a> He drove King -Luli from Sidon "by the mere terror of the splendour -of my sovereignty," and placed Tubalu (<i>i.e.</i>, Ithbaal) -in his place, and subdued into tributary districts Arpad, -Byblos, Ashdod, Ammon, Moab, and Edom, suppressing -at the same time a very abortive rising in Samaria. -"All these brought rich presents and kissed my feet." -He also subdued Zidka, King of Askelon, from whom -he took Beth-Dagon, Joppa, and other towns. Pad, -the King of Ekron, was a faithful vassal of Assyria; -he was therefore deposed by the revolting Ekronites, -and sent in chains into the safe custody of Hezekiah, -who "imprisoned him in darkness." The rebel states -all relied on the Egyptians and Ethiopians. Sennacherib -fought against Egyptians and Ethiopians, "in reliance -upon Assur my God," at Altaqu (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 701), and claims -to have defeated them, and carried off the sons and -charioteers of the King of Egypt, and the charioteers -of the kings of Ethiopia.<a name="FNanchor_553_553" id="FNanchor_553_553"></a><a href="#Footnote_553_553" class="fnanchor">[553]</a> He then tells us that he -punished Altaqu and Timnath.<a name="FNanchor_554_554" id="FNanchor_554_554"></a><a href="#Footnote_554_554" class="fnanchor">[554]</a> He impaled the rebels -of Ekron on stakes all round the city. He restored Pad, -and made him a vassal. "Hezekiah [Chazaqiahu] of -Judah, who had not submitted to my yoke, the terror of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_328" id="Page_328">[Pg 328]</a></span> -the splendour of my sovereignty overwhelmed. Himself -as a bird in a cage, in the midst of Jerusalem, his -royal city, I shut up. The Arabians and his dependants, -whom he had introduced for the defence of -Jerusalem, his royal city, together with thirty talents -of gold, eight hundred of silver, bullion, precious stones, -ivory couches and thrones, an abundant treasure, with -his daughters, his harem, and his attendants, I caused -to be brought after me to Nineveh. He sent his envoy -to pay tribute and render homage." At the same time, -he overran Juda, took forty-six fenced cities and -many smaller towns, "with laying down of walls, -hewing about, and trampling down," and carried off -more than two hundred thousand captives with their -spoil. Part of Hezekiah's domains was divided among -three Philistine vassals who had remained faithful to -Assyria.</p> - -<p>It was in the midst of this terrible crisis that -Hezekiah had sent to Sennacherib at Lachish his offer -of submission, saying, "I have offended; return from -me; that which thou puttest upon me I will bear."<a name="FNanchor_555_555" id="FNanchor_555_555"></a><a href="#Footnote_555_555" class="fnanchor">[555]</a> -The spoiling of the palace and Temple was rendered -necessary to raise the vast mulct which the Assyrian -King required.<a name="FNanchor_556_556" id="FNanchor_556_556"></a><a href="#Footnote_556_556" class="fnanchor">[556]</a></p> - -<p>It is at Lachish—now Um-Lakis, a fortified hill in -the Shephelah, south of Jerusalem, between Gaza and -Eleutheropolis—that we catch another personal glimpse -of the mighty oppressor. We see him depicted, on his -triumphal tablets, in the palace-chambers of Kouyunjik,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_329" id="Page_329">[Pg 329]</a></span> -engaged in the siege; for the town offered a determined -resistance,<a name="FNanchor_557_557" id="FNanchor_557_557"></a><a href="#Footnote_557_557" class="fnanchor">[557]</a> and required all the energies and all the -trained heroism of his forces. We see him next, -carefully painted, seated on his royal throne in magnificent -apparel, with his tiara and bracelets, receiving the -spoils and captives of the city. The inscription says: -"Sennacherib, the mighty king, the king of the country -of Assyria, sitting on the throne of judgment at the -entrance of the city of Lakisha. I give permission for -its slaughter." He certainly implied that he took the -city, but a doubt is thrown on this by 2 Chron. xxxii. 1, -which only says that "he <i>thought</i> to win these cities"; -and the historian says (2 Kings xix. 8) that he "departed -from Lachish." Lachish was evidently a very strong -city, and it is so depicted in the palace-tablets at -Kouyunjik. It had been fortified by Rehoboam, and -had furnished a refuge to the wretched Amaziah.<a name="FNanchor_558_558" id="FNanchor_558_558"></a><a href="#Footnote_558_558" class="fnanchor">[558]</a></p> - -<p>If Judah and Jerusalem had listened to the messages -of Isaiah,<a name="FNanchor_559_559" id="FNanchor_559_559"></a><a href="#Footnote_559_559" class="fnanchor">[559]</a> they might have been saved the humiliating -affliction which seemed to have plunged the brief sun -of their prosperity into seas of blood. He had warned<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_330" id="Page_330">[Pg 330]</a></span> -them incessantly and in vain. He had foretold their -present desolation, in which Zion should be like a -woman seated on the ground, wailing in her despair. -He had taught them that formalism was no religion, -and that external rites did not win Jehovah's approval. -He had told them how foolish it was to put trust in the -shadow of Egypt, and had not shrunk from revealing -the fearful consequences which should follow the setting -up of their own false wisdom against the wisdom of -Jehovah. Yet, intermingled with pictures of suffering, -and threats of a harvestless year, designed to punish -the vanity and display of their women, and the intimation—never -actually fulfilled—that even the palace and -Temple should become "the joy of wild asses, a pasture -of flocks," he constantly implies that the disaster -would be followed by a mysterious, divine, complete -deliverance, and ultimately by a Messianic reign of joy -and peace. Night is at hand, he said, and darkness; -but after the darkness will come a brighter dawn.</p> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_331" id="Page_331">[Pg 331]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXVIII" id="CHAPTER_XXVIII">CHAPTER XXVIII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE GREAT DELIVERANCE</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 701</h4> - -<h4>2 <i>Kings</i> xix. 1-37</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"There brake He the lightnings of the bow, the shield, the sword, -and the battle."—<span class="smcap">Psalm</span> lxxvi. 3.</p></blockquote> - -<p class="center">"ᾠδὴ πρὸς τὸν Ασσύριον."—LXX.</p> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"And the might of the Gentile, unsmote by the sword,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">Hath melted like snow at the glance of the Lord."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 30.5em;"><span class="smcap">Byron.</span></span> -</p> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"Vuolsi cosi col dove si puote</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">Cio che si vuole: e pi non dimandare."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 30.5em;"><span class="smcap">Dante.</span></span> -</p> - -<p><span style="margin-left: 10em;">"Through love, through hope, through faith's transcendent dower,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">We feel that we are greater than we know."</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 29em;"><span class="smcap">Wordsworth.</span></span> -</p> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"God shall help her, and that when the morning dawns."—<span class="smcap">Psalm</span> -xlvi. 5.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>In spite of the humble submission of Hezekiah, it is -a surprise to learn from Isaiah that Sennacherib—after -he had accepted the huge fine and fixed the -tribute, and departed to subdue Lachish—broke his -covenant.<a name="FNanchor_560_560" id="FNanchor_560_560"></a><a href="#Footnote_560_560" class="fnanchor">[560]</a> He sent his three chief officers—the Turtan, -or commander-in-chief, whose name seems to have been -Belemurani;<a name="FNanchor_561_561" id="FNanchor_561_561"></a><a href="#Footnote_561_561" class="fnanchor">[561]</a> the Rabsaris, or chief eunuch;<a name="FNanchor_562_562" id="FNanchor_562_562"></a><a href="#Footnote_562_562" class="fnanchor">[562]</a> and the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_332" id="Page_332">[Pg 332]</a></span> -Rabshakeh, or chief captain<a name="FNanchor_563_563" id="FNanchor_563_563"></a><a href="#Footnote_563_563" class="fnanchor">[563]</a>—from Lachish to Hezekiah, -with a command of absolute, unconditional surrender, -to be followed by deportation. By this conduct -Sennacherib violated his own boast that he was "a -keeper of treaties." Yet it is not difficult to conjecture -the reason for his change of plan. He had found it no -easy matter to subdue even the very minor fortress of -Lachish; how unwise, then, would it be for him to -leave in his rear an uncaptured city so well fortified -as Jerusalem! He was advancing towards Egypt. It -was obviously a strategic error to spare on his route a -hostile and almost impregnable stronghold as a nucleus -for the plans of his enemies. Moreover, he had heard -rumours that Tirhakah, the third and last Ethiopian -king of Egypt, was advancing against him, and it was -most important to prevent any junction between his -forces and those of Hezekiah.<a name="FNanchor_564_564" id="FNanchor_564_564"></a><a href="#Footnote_564_564" class="fnanchor">[564]</a> He could not come in -person to Jerusalem, for the siege of Lachish was on -his hands; but he detached from his army a large -contingent under his Turtan, to win the Jews by -seductive promises, or to subdue Jerusalem by force. -Once more, therefore, the Holy City saw beneath her -often-captured walls the vast beleaguering host, and -"governors and rulers clothed most gorgeously, horsemen -riding upon horses, all of them desirable young -men." Isaiah describes to us how the people crowded -to the house-tops, half dead with fear, weeping and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_333" id="Page_333">[Pg 333]</a></span> -despairing, and crying to the hills to cover them, and -bereft of their rulers, who had been bound by the -archers of the enemy in their attempt to escape. They -gazed on the quiver-bearing warriors of Elam in their -chariots, and the serried ranks of the shields of Kir, -and the cavalry round the gates. And he tells us how, -as so often occurs at moments of mad hopelessness, -many who ought to have been crying to God in sackcloth -and ashes, gave themselves up, on the contrary, -to riot and revelry, eating flesh, and drinking wine, -and saying: "Let us eat and drink; for to-morrow we -die."<a name="FNanchor_565_565" id="FNanchor_565_565"></a><a href="#Footnote_565_565" class="fnanchor">[565]</a> The king alone had shown patience, calmness, -and active foresight; and he alone, by his energy and -faith, had restored some confidence to the spirits of his -fainting people.</p> - -<p>Although the city had been refortified by the king, -and supplied with water, the hearts of the inhabitants -must have sunk within them when they saw the -Assyrian army investing the walls, and when the three -commissioners—taking their station "by the conduit of -the upper pool which is in the highway of the fuller's -field"—summoned the king to hear the ultimatum of -Sennacherib.</p> - -<p>The king did not in person obey the summons; but -he, too, sent out his three chief officers. They were -Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah, who, as the chamberlain -(<i>al-hab-bath</i>), was a great prince (<i>nagd</i>); Shebna, who -had been degraded, perhaps at the instance of Isaiah, -from the higher post, and was now secretary (<i>sopher</i>); -and Joah, son of Asaph, the chronicler (<i>mazkr</i>), to -whom we probably owe the minute report of the -memorable scene. No doubt they went forth in the -pomp of office—Eliakim with his robe, and girdle, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_334" id="Page_334">[Pg 334]</a></span> -key.<a name="FNanchor_566_566" id="FNanchor_566_566"></a><a href="#Footnote_566_566" class="fnanchor">[566]</a> The Rabshakeh proved himself, indeed, "an -affluent orator," and evinced such familiarity with the -religious politics of Judah and Jerusalem, that this, in -conjunction with his perfect mastery of Hebrew, gives -colour to the belief that he was an apostate Jew. He -began by challenging the idle confidence of Hezekiah, -and his vain words<a name="FNanchor_567_567" id="FNanchor_567_567"></a><a href="#Footnote_567_567" class="fnanchor">[567]</a> that he had counsel and strength -for the war. Upon what did he rely? On the -broken and dangerous bulrush of Egypt?<a name="FNanchor_568_568" id="FNanchor_568_568"></a><a href="#Footnote_568_568" class="fnanchor">[568]</a> It would -but pierce his hand! On Jehovah? But Hezekiah -had forfeited his protection by sweeping away His -<i>bamoth</i> and His altars! Why, let Hezekiah make a -wager;<a name="FNanchor_569_569" id="FNanchor_569_569"></a><a href="#Footnote_569_569" class="fnanchor">[569]</a> and if Sennacherib furnished him with two -thousand horses, he would be unable to find riders for -them! How, then, could he drive back even the lowest -of the Assyrian captains? And was not Jehovah on -their side? It was He who had bidden them destroy -Jerusalem!</p> - -<p>That last bold assertion, appealing as it did to all -that was erroneous and abject in the minds of the -superstitious, and backed, as it was, by the undeniable -force of the envoy's argument, smote so bitterly on the -ear of Hezekiah's courtiers, that they feared it would -render negotiation impossible. They humbly entreated -the orator to speak to "his servants" in the Aramaic -language of Assyria, which they understood,<a name="FNanchor_570_570" id="FNanchor_570_570"></a><a href="#Footnote_570_570" class="fnanchor">[570]</a> and not -in Hebrew, which was the language of all the Jews -who stood in crowds on the walls. Surely this was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_335" id="Page_335">[Pg 335]</a></span> -a diplomatic embassy to their king, not an incitement -to popular sedition?</p> - -<p>The answer of the Rabshakeh was truly Assyrian -in its utterly brutal and ruthless coarseness. Taking -up his position directly in front of the wall,<a name="FNanchor_571_571" id="FNanchor_571_571"></a><a href="#Footnote_571_571" class="fnanchor">[571]</a> and -ostentatiously addressing the multitude, he ignored -the representatives of Hezekiah. Who were they? -asked he. His master had not sent him to speak to -them, or to their poor little puppet of a king, but to the -people on the wall, the foul garbage of whose sufferings -of thirst and famine they should share.<a name="FNanchor_572_572" id="FNanchor_572_572"></a><a href="#Footnote_572_572" class="fnanchor">[572]</a> And to all -the multitude the great king's<a name="FNanchor_573_573" id="FNanchor_573_573"></a><a href="#Footnote_573_573" class="fnanchor">[573]</a> message was:—Do not -be deceived. Hezekiah cannot save you. Jehovah -will not save you. Come to terms with me, and give -me hostages and pledges and a present, and then live -in happy peace and plenty until I come and deport you -to a land as fair and fruitful as this. How should -Jehovah deliver them? Had any of the gods of the -nations delivered them out of the hands of the King of -Assyria? "Where are the gods of Hamath, and of -Arpad? Where are the gods of Sepharvaim, Hena, -and Ivvah? Have the gods of Samaria delivered -Samaria out of my hand, that Jehovah should deliver -Jerusalem out of my hand?"<a name="FNanchor_574_574" id="FNanchor_574_574"></a><a href="#Footnote_574_574" class="fnanchor">[574]</a></p> - -<p>It was a very powerful oration, but the orator must -have been a little disconcerted to find that it was -listened to in absolute silence. He had disgracefully<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_336" id="Page_336">[Pg 336]</a></span> -violated the comity of international intercourse by -appealing to subjects against their lawful king; yet -from the starving people there came not a murmur of -reply. Faithful to the behest of their king in the midst -of their misery and terror, they answered not a word. -Agamemnon is silent before the coarse jeers of Thersites. -"The sulphurous flash dies in its own smoke, only -leaving a hateful stench behind it!" And in this -attitude of the people there was something very sublime -and very instructive. Dumb, stricken, starving, the -wretched Jews did not answer the envoy's taunts or -menaces, because they would not. They were not -even in those extremities to be seduced from their -allegiance to the king whom they honoured, though -the speaker had contemptuously ignored his existence. -And though the Rabshakeh had cut them to the heart -with his specious appeals and braggart vaunts, yet -"this clever, self-confident, persuasive personage, with -two languages on his tongue, and an army at his back," -could not shake the confidence in God, which, however -unreasonable it might seem, had been elevated into a -conviction by their king and their prophet. The Rabsak -had tried to seduce the people into rebellion, but he -had failed.<a name="FNanchor_575_575" id="FNanchor_575_575"></a><a href="#Footnote_575_575" class="fnanchor">[575]</a> They were ready to die for Hezekiah with -the fidelity of despair. The mirage of sensual comfort -in exiled servitude should not tempt them from the -scorched wilderness from which they could still cry -out for the living God.</p> - -<p>Yet the Assyrian's words had struck home into the -hearts of his greatest hearers, and therefore how much -more into those of the ignorant multitudes! Eliakim<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_337" id="Page_337">[Pg 337]</a></span> -and Shebna and Joah came to Hezekiah with their -clothes rent, and told him the words of the Rabshakeh. -And when the king heard it, when he found that even -his submission had been utterly in vain, he too rent -his clothes, and put on sackcloth,<a name="FNanchor_576_576" id="FNanchor_576_576"></a><a href="#Footnote_576_576" class="fnanchor">[576]</a> and went into the -only place where he could hope to find comfort, even -into the house of the Lord, which he had cleansed and -restored to beauty, although afterwards he had been -driven to despoil it. Needing an earthly counsellor, -he sent Eliakim and Shebna and the elders of the -priests to Isaiah. They were to tell him the outcome -of this day of trouble, rebuke, and contumely; and since -the Rabshakeh had insulted and despised Jehovah, -they were to urge the prophet to make his appeal to -Him, and to pray for the remnant which the Assyrians -had left.<a name="FNanchor_577_577" id="FNanchor_577_577"></a><a href="#Footnote_577_577" class="fnanchor">[577]</a></p> - -<p>The answer of Isaiah was a dauntless defiance. If -others were in despair, he was not in the least dismayed. -"Be not afraid"—such was his message—"of the -mere words with which the boastful boys of the King -of Assyria have blasphemed Me.<a name="FNanchor_578_578" id="FNanchor_578_578"></a><a href="#Footnote_578_578" class="fnanchor">[578]</a> Behold, I will put -a spirit in him, and he shall hear a rumour,<a name="FNanchor_579_579" id="FNanchor_579_579"></a><a href="#Footnote_579_579" class="fnanchor">[579]</a> and shall -return to his own land; and I will cause him to fall -by the sword in his own land."</p> - -<p>Much crestfallen at the total and unexpected failure -of the embassy, and of his own heart-shaking appeals, -the Rabshakeh returned. But meanwhile Sennacherib -had taken Lachish, and marched to Libnah (Tel-es-Safa),<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_338" id="Page_338">[Pg 338]</a></span> -which he was now besieging.<a name="FNanchor_580_580" id="FNanchor_580_580"></a><a href="#Footnote_580_580" class="fnanchor">[580]</a> There it was -that he heard the "rumour" of which Isaiah had -spoken—the report, namely, that Tirhakah, the third -king of the Ethiopian dynasty of Pharaohs,<a name="FNanchor_581_581" id="FNanchor_581_581"></a><a href="#Footnote_581_581" class="fnanchor">[581]</a> was -advancing in person to meet him. This was <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 701, -and it is perhaps only by anticipation that Tirhakah -is called "King" of Ethiopia. He was only the general -and representative of his father Shabatok, if (as some -think) he did not succeed to the throne till 698.</p> - -<p>It was impossible for Sennacherib under these circumstances -to return northwards to Jerusalem, of which -the siege would inevitably occupy some time. But -he sent a menacing letter,<a name="FNanchor_582_582" id="FNanchor_582_582"></a><a href="#Footnote_582_582" class="fnanchor">[582]</a> reminding Hezekiah that -neither king nor god had ever yet saved any city from -the hands of the Assyrian destroyers. Where were -the kings, he asked again, of Hamath, Arpad, Sepharvaim, -Hena, Ivvah? What had the gods of Gozan, -Haran, Rezeph, and the children of Eden in Telassar -done to save their countries from Sennacherib's ancestors, -when they had laid them under the ban?<a name="FNanchor_583_583" id="FNanchor_583_583"></a><a href="#Footnote_583_583" class="fnanchor">[583]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_339" id="Page_339">[Pg 339]</a></span></p> - -<p>Again the pious king found comfort in God's Temple. -Taking with him the scornful and blasphemous letter, -he spread it out before Jehovah in the Temple with -childlike simplicity, that Jehovah might read its insults -and be moved by this dumb appeal.<a name="FNanchor_584_584" id="FNanchor_584_584"></a><a href="#Footnote_584_584" class="fnanchor">[584]</a> Then both he -and Isaiah cried mightily to God, "who sitteth above -the cherubim," admitting the truth of what Sennacherib -had said, and that the kings of Assyria had destroyed -the nations, and burnt their vain gods in the fire. -But of what significance was that? Those were but -gods of wood and stone, the works of men's hands.<a name="FNanchor_585_585" id="FNanchor_585_585"></a><a href="#Footnote_585_585" class="fnanchor">[585]</a> -But Jehovah was the One, the True, the Living God. -Would He not manifest among the nations His eternal -supremacy?</p> - -<p>And as the king prayed the word of Jehovah -came to Isaiah, and he sent to Hezekiah this glorious -message about Sennacherib:—</p> - -<p>"The virgin, the daughter of Zion, hath despised -thee, and laughed thee to scorn. The daughter of -Jerusalem hath shaken her head at thee."<a name="FNanchor_586_586" id="FNanchor_586_586"></a><a href="#Footnote_586_586" class="fnanchor">[586]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_340" id="Page_340">[Pg 340]</a></span></p> - -<p>The blasphemies, the vaunts, the menacing self-confidence -of Sennacherib, were his surest condemnation. -Did he count God a cypher? It was to God alone -that he owed the fearful power which had made the -nations like grass upon the housetops, like blasted corn, -before him. And because God knew his rage and -tumult, God would treat him as Sargon his father had -treated conquered kings:—</p> - -<p>"I will put My hook in thy nose, and My bridle in -thy lips.<a name="FNanchor_587_587" id="FNanchor_587_587"></a><a href="#Footnote_587_587" class="fnanchor">[587]</a> And I will turn thee back by the way by -which thou camest." He had thought to conquer -Egypt:<a name="FNanchor_588_588" id="FNanchor_588_588"></a><a href="#Footnote_588_588" class="fnanchor">[588]</a> instead of that he should be driven back in -confusion to Assyria.</p> - -<p>It was but a plainer enunciation of the truths which -Isaiah had again and again intimated in enigma and -parable. It was the fearless security of Judah's lion; -the safety of the rock amid the deluge; the safety of -the poor brood under the wings of the Divine protection -from "the great Birds'-nester of the world"; the -crashing downfall of the lopped Lebanonian cedar, -while the green shoot and tender branch out of the -withered stump of Jesse should take root downward -and bear fruit upward.<a name="FNanchor_589_589" id="FNanchor_589_589"></a><a href="#Footnote_589_589" class="fnanchor">[589]</a></p> - -<p>And the sign was given to Hezekiah that this should -be so.<a name="FNanchor_590_590" id="FNanchor_590_590"></a><a href="#Footnote_590_590" class="fnanchor">[590]</a> This year there should be no harvest, except<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_341" id="Page_341">[Pg 341]</a></span> -such as was spontaneous; for in the stress of Assyrian -invasion sowing and reaping had been impossible. -The next year the harvest should only be from this -accidental produce. But in the third year, secure at -last, they should sow and reap, and plant vineyards -and eat the fruit thereof.<a name="FNanchor_591_591" id="FNanchor_591_591"></a><a href="#Footnote_591_591" class="fnanchor">[591]</a> And though but a remnant -of the people was left out of the recent captivity, they -should grow and flourish, and Jerusalem should see -the besieging host of Assyria no more for ever; for -Jehovah would defend the city for His own sake, and -for His servant David's sake.</p> - -<p>Thereafter occurred the great deliverance.<a name="FNanchor_592_592" id="FNanchor_592_592"></a><a href="#Footnote_592_592" class="fnanchor">[592]</a> In some -way—we know not and never shall know how—by -a blast of the simoom, or sudden outburst of plague, -or furious panic, or sudden assault, or by some other -calamity,<a name="FNanchor_593_593" id="FNanchor_593_593"></a><a href="#Footnote_593_593" class="fnanchor">[593]</a> the host of Assyria was smitten in the camp, -and one hundred and eighty-five thousand, including -their chief leaders, perished. The historian, in a -manner habitual to pious Semitic writers, attributes -the devastation to the direct action of the "angel of -the Lord";<a name="FNanchor_594_594" id="FNanchor_594_594"></a><a href="#Footnote_594_594" class="fnanchor">[594]</a> but as Dr. Johnson said long ago, "We -are certainly not to suppose that the angel went about<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_342" id="Page_342">[Pg 342]</a></span> -with a sword in his hand, striking them one by one, -but that some powerful natural agent was employed."<a name="FNanchor_595_595" id="FNanchor_595_595"></a><a href="#Footnote_595_595" class="fnanchor">[595]</a></p> - -<p>The Forty-Sixth Psalm is generally regarded as the -<i>Te Deum</i> sung in the Temple over this deliverance, -and its opening words, "God is our refuge and strength," -are inscribed over the cathedral of St. Sophia at Constantinople.</p> - -<p>It is usually supposed that this overwhelming disaster -happened to the host of Assyria <i>before Jerusalem</i>. -This, however, is not stated; and as the capture of -Lachish was an urgent necessity, it is probable that -the Turtan led back the forces which had accompanied -him, and took them afterwards to Libnah.<a name="FNanchor_596_596" id="FNanchor_596_596"></a><a href="#Footnote_596_596" class="fnanchor">[596]</a> Yet, since -Libnah was but ten miles from Jerusalem, the Jews -could not feel safe for a day until the mighty news -came that the</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Angel of God spread his wings on the blast,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">And breathed in the face of the foe as he passed,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">And the eyes of the sleepers waxed heavy and chill,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">And their breasts but once heaved, and for ever grew still."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>When the catastrophe which had happened to the -main army and the flight of Sennacherib became -known, the scattered forces would melt away.</p> - -<p>All the Assyrians who escaped were now hurrying -back<a name="FNanchor_597_597" id="FNanchor_597_597"></a><a href="#Footnote_597_597" class="fnanchor">[597]</a> to Nineveh with their foiled king. Sennacherib<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_343" id="Page_343">[Pg 343]</a></span><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_344" id="Page_344">[Pg 344]</a></span> -seems to have occupied himself in the north, except -so far as he was forced to fight fiercely against his -own rebel subjects. He never recovered this complete -humiliation. He never again came southwards. He -survived the catastrophe for seventeen or twenty years,<a name="FNanchor_598_598" id="FNanchor_598_598"></a><a href="#Footnote_598_598" class="fnanchor">[598]</a> -and fought five or six campaigns; but at the end of -that period, while he was worshipping in the house of -Nisroch or Assarac (Assur), his god,<a name="FNanchor_599_599" id="FNanchor_599_599"></a><a href="#Footnote_599_599" class="fnanchor">[599]</a> he was murdered -by his two sons Adrammelech (Adar-malik—"Adar is -king") and Sharezer (Nergal-sarussar—"Nergal protect -the king"),<a name="FNanchor_600_600" id="FNanchor_600_600"></a><a href="#Footnote_600_600" class="fnanchor">[600]</a> who envied him his throne. They escaped -into the land of Ararat, but were defeated and killed -by their younger brother Esarhaddon (Assur-kh-iddin—"Assur -bestowed a 'brother'") at the battle of -Hani-Rabbat, on the Upper Euphrates. He succeeded -Sennacherib, and ultimately avenged on Egypt his -father's overwhelming disaster. He is perhaps the -"cruel lord" of Isa. xix. 4, and it is not unnatural -that he should have prevailed against his parricidal -brothers, for we are told that in a previous battle at -Melitene he had shown such prowess that the troops -then and there proclaimed him King of Assyria with -shouts of "This is our king."<a name="FNanchor_601_601" id="FNanchor_601_601"></a><a href="#Footnote_601_601" class="fnanchor">[601]</a> He reigned from <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> -681-668, and in his reign Assyria culminated before -her last decline.<a name="FNanchor_602_602" id="FNanchor_602_602"></a><a href="#Footnote_602_602" class="fnanchor">[602]</a> He was the builder of the temple -at Nimrd, and erected thirty other temples. Babylon -and Nineveh were both his capitals,<a name="FNanchor_603_603" id="FNanchor_603_603"></a><a href="#Footnote_603_603" class="fnanchor">[603]</a> and he had -previously been viceroy of the former.</p> - -<p>The glorious deliverance in which the faith and -courage of the King of Judah had had their share -naturally increased the prosperity and prestige of -Hezekiah, and lifted the authority of Isaiah to an unprecedented -height. Hezekiah probably did not long -survive the uplifting of this dark cloud, but during the -remainder of his life "he was magnified in the sight -of all nations."<a name="FNanchor_604_604" id="FNanchor_604_604"></a><a href="#Footnote_604_604" class="fnanchor">[604]</a> When he died, all Judah and Jerusalem -did him honour, and gave him a splendid burial. -Apparently the old tombs of the kings—the catacomb -constructed by David and Solomon—had in the course -of two and a half centuries become full, so that he had -to be buried "in the ascent of the sepulchres," perhaps -some niche higher than the other graves of the catacomb, -which was henceforth disused for the burial of the -kings of Judah. We have had occasion to observe the -many particulars in which his reign was memorable, -and to his other services must be added the literary -activity to which we owe the collection and editing, by -his scribes, of the Proverbs of Solomon. His reign -had practically witnessed the institution of the faithful<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_345" id="Page_345">[Pg 345]</a></span> -Jewish Church under the influence of his great prophetic -guide.<a name="FNanchor_605_605" id="FNanchor_605_605"></a><a href="#Footnote_605_605" class="fnanchor">[605]</a></p> - -<p>The question whether the portent of the destruction -of the Assyrian was identical with that related by -Herodotus has never been finally answered. Herodotus -places the scene of the disaster at Pelusium,<a name="FNanchor_606_606" id="FNanchor_606_606"></a><a href="#Footnote_606_606" class="fnanchor">[606]</a> and tells -this story:—Sennacherib, King of the Arabs and -Assyrians, invaded Egypt. Its king, Sethos, of the -Tanite dynasty, in despair entered the temple of his god -Pthah (or Vulcan), and wept.<a name="FNanchor_607_607" id="FNanchor_607_607"></a><a href="#Footnote_607_607" class="fnanchor">[607]</a> The god appeared to -him with promises of deliverance, and Sethos marched -to meet Sennacherib with an army of poor artisans, -since he was a priest, and the caste of warriors was -ill-affected to him. In the night the god Pthah sent -hosts of field-mice, which gnawed the quivers, bow-strings, -and shield-straps of the Assyrians, who consequently -fled, and were massacred. An image of the -priest-king with a mouse in his hand stood in the -temple of Pthah, and on its pedestal the inscription, -which might also point the moral of the Biblical narrative, -Ἐς ἐμέ τις ὁρεῶν εὐσεβὴς ἔστω ("Let him who -looks on me be pious"). Josephus seems so far to -accept this version that he refers to Herodotus, and -says that Sennacherib's failure was the result of a -frustration in Egypt.<a name="FNanchor_608_608" id="FNanchor_608_608"></a><a href="#Footnote_608_608" class="fnanchor">[608]</a> The <i>mouse</i> in the hand of the -statue probably originated the details of the legend; -but according to Horapollion it was the hieroglyphic<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_346" id="Page_346">[Pg 346]</a></span> -sign of destruction by plague.<a name="FNanchor_609_609" id="FNanchor_609_609"></a><a href="#Footnote_609_609" class="fnanchor">[609]</a> Bhr says that it was -also the symbol of Mars. Readers of Homer will -remember the title Apollo <i>Smintheus</i> ("the destroyer of -mice"), and the story that mice were worshipped in the -Troas because they gnawed the bow-strings of the -enemy.</p> - -<p>But whatever may have been the mode of the retribution, -or the scene in which it took place, it is certainly -historical. The outlines of the narrative in the sacred -historian are identical with those in the Assyrian -records. The annals of Sennacherib tell us the four -initial stages of the great campaign in the conquest of -Phœnicia, of Askelon, and of Ekron, the defeat of the -Egyptians at Altaqu, and the earlier hostilities against -Hezekiah. The Book of Kings concentrates our attention -on the details of the close of the invasion. On -this point, whether from accident, or because Sennacherib -did not choose to register his own calamity, -and the frustration of the gods of whose protection he -boasted, the Assyrian records are silent. Baffled conquerors -rarely dwell on their own disasters. It is not -in the despatches of Napoleon that we shall find the -true story of his abandonment of Syria, of the defeats -of his forces in Spain, or of his retreat from Moscow.<a name="FNanchor_610_610" id="FNanchor_610_610"></a><a href="#Footnote_610_610" class="fnanchor">[610]</a></p> - -<p>The great lesson of the whole story is the reward -and the triumph of indomitable faith. Faith may still -burn with a steady flame when the difficulties around -it seem insuperable, when all refutation of the attacks<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_347" id="Page_347">[Pg 347]</a></span> -of its enemies seems to be impossible, when Hope itself -has sunk into white ashes in which scarcely a gleam of -heat remains. Isaiah had nothing to rely upon; he -had no argument wherewith to furnish Hezekiah beyond -the bare and apparently unmeaning promise, "Jehovah -is our Judge; Jehovah is our Lawgiver; Jehovah is -our King. He will save us." It was a magnificent -vindication of his inspired conviction, when all turned -out—not indeed in minute details, but in every essential -fact—exactly as he had prophesied from the first. Even -in <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 740 he had declared that the sins of Judah -deserved and would receive condign punishment, though -a remnant should be saved.<a name="FNanchor_611_611" id="FNanchor_611_611"></a><a href="#Footnote_611_611" class="fnanchor">[611]</a> That the retribution -would come from some foreign enemy—Assyria or -Egypt, or both—he felt sure. Jehovah would hiss for -the fly in the uttermost canals of Egypt, and for the -bee that is in the land of Assyria, and both should -swarm in the crevices of the rocks, and over the -pastures.<a name="FNanchor_612_612" id="FNanchor_612_612"></a><a href="#Footnote_612_612" class="fnanchor">[612]</a> Later on in 732, in the reign of Ahaz, he -pointed to Assyria,<a name="FNanchor_613_613" id="FNanchor_613_613"></a><a href="#Footnote_613_613" class="fnanchor">[613]</a> as the destined scourge, and he -realised this still more clearly in 725 and 721, when -Shalmaneser and Sargon were tearing Samaria to -pieces.<a name="FNanchor_614_614" id="FNanchor_614_614"></a><a href="#Footnote_614_614" class="fnanchor">[614]</a> Contrary, indeed, to his expectation, the Assyrians -did not then destroy Jerusalem, or even formally -besiege it. The revolt from Assyria, the reliance on -Egypt, did not for a moment blind his judgment or -alter his conviction; and in 701 it came true when -Sennacherib was on the march for Palestine.<a name="FNanchor_615_615" id="FNanchor_615_615"></a><a href="#Footnote_615_615" class="fnanchor">[615]</a> Yet he -never wavered in the apparently impossible conclusion, -that, in spite of all, in spite even of his own darker -prophecies (xxxii. 14), Jerusalem shall in some Divine<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_348" id="Page_348">[Pg 348]</a></span> -manner be saved.<a name="FNanchor_616_616" id="FNanchor_616_616"></a><a href="#Footnote_616_616" class="fnanchor">[616]</a> The deliverance would be, as he -declared from first to last, the work of Jehovah, not the -work of man,<a name="FNanchor_617_617" id="FNanchor_617_617"></a><a href="#Footnote_617_617" class="fnanchor">[617]</a> and because of it Sennacherib would -return to his own land and perish there.<a name="FNanchor_618_618" id="FNanchor_618_618"></a><a href="#Footnote_618_618" class="fnanchor">[618]</a> The details -might be dim and wavering; the result was certain. -Isaiah was no thaumaturge, no peeping wizard, no muttering -necromancer, no monthly prognosticator.<a name="FNanchor_619_619" id="FNanchor_619_619"></a><a href="#Footnote_619_619" class="fnanchor">[619]</a> He -was a prophet—that is, an inspired moral and spiritual -teacher who was able to foresee and to foretell, not in -their details, but in their broad outlines, the events yet -future, because he was enabled to read them by the eye -of faith ere they had yet occurred. His faith convinced -him that predictions founded on eternal principles have -all the certainty of a law, and that God's dealings with -men and nations in the future can be seen in the light -of experience derived from the history of the past. -Courage, zeal, unquenchable hope, indomitable resolution, -spring from that perfect confidence in God which -is the natural reward of innocence and faithfulness. -Isaiah trusted in God, and he knew that they who put -their trust in Him can never be confounded.</p> - -<p>No event produced a deeper impression on the minds -of the Jews, though that impression was soon afterwards, -for a time, obliterated. Naturally, it elevated -the authority of Isaiah into unquestioned pre-eminence -during the reign of Hezekiah. It has left its echo, not -only in his own triumphant pans, but also in the Forty-Sixth -Psalm, which the Septuagint calls "An ode to the -Assyrian," and perhaps also in the Seventy-Fifth and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_349" id="Page_349">[Pg 349]</a></span> -Seventy-Sixth Psalms. In the minds of all faithful -Israelites it established for ever the conviction that God -had chosen Judah for Himself, and Israel for His own -possession; that God was in the midst of Zion, and -she should not be confounded: "God shall help her, and -that right early." And it contains a noble and inspiring -lesson for all time. "It is not without reason," says -Dean Stanley, "that in the Churches of Moscow the -exultation over the fall of Sennacherib is still read on -the anniversary of the retreat of the French from -Russia, or that Arnold, in his lectures on Modern -History, in the impressive passage in which he dwells -on that great catastrophe, declared that for the memorable -night of the frost in which twenty thousand horses -perished, and the strength of the French army was -utterly broken, he knew of no language so well fitted -to describe it as the words in which Isaiah described -the advance and destruction of the hosts of -Sennacherib."<a name="FNanchor_620_620" id="FNanchor_620_620"></a><a href="#Footnote_620_620" class="fnanchor">[620]</a></p> - -<p>They had been brought face to face, the two kings—Sennacherib -and Hezekiah. One was the impious -boaster who relied on his own strength, and on the -mighty host which dried up rivers with their trampling -march—the worldling who thought to lord it over the -affrighted globe; the other was the poor kinglet of the -Chosen People, with his one city and his enfeebled -people, and his dominion not so large as one of the -smallest English counties. But "one with God is -irresistible," "one with God is always in a majority." -The poor, weak prince triumphs over the terrific conqueror, -because he trusts in Him to whom world-desolating -tyrants are but as the small dust of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_350" id="Page_350">[Pg 350]</a></span> -balance, and who "taketh up the isles as a very little -thing."<a name="FNanchor_621_621" id="FNanchor_621_621"></a><a href="#Footnote_621_621" class="fnanchor">[621]</a></p> - -<p>As Assyria now vanishes almost entirely from the -history of the Chosen People, we may here recall with -delight one large and loving prophecy, to show that -the Hebrews were sometimes uplifted by the power -of inspiration above the narrowness of a bigoted and -exclusive spirit. Desperately as Israel had suffered, -both from Egypt and Assyria, Isaiah could still utter -the glowing Messianic Prophecy which included the -Gentiles in the privileges of the Golden Age to come. -He foretold that—</p> - -<p>"In that day shall Israel be the third with Egypt -and Assyria, as a blessing in the midst of the land: -whom the Lord of hosts shall bless, saying, Blessed -be Egypt My people, and Assyria the work of My -hands, and Israel Mine inheritance."<a name="FNanchor_622_622" id="FNanchor_622_622"></a><a href="#Footnote_622_622" class="fnanchor">[622]</a></p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"That strain I heard was of a higher mood!"<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<hr class="tb" /> - -<p>King Hezekiah can have no finer panegyric than -that of the son of Sirach: "Even the kings of Judah -failed, for they forsook the law of the Most High: all -except David, and Ezekias, and Josias failed."<a name="FNanchor_623_623" id="FNanchor_623_623"></a><a href="#Footnote_623_623" class="fnanchor">[623]</a></p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_351" id="Page_351">[Pg 351]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXIX" id="CHAPTER_XXIX">CHAPTER XXIX</a></h2> - -<h3><i>MANASSEH</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 686-641</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xxi. 1-16</h4> - -<p> -<span style="margin-left: 10em;">"Shall the throne of wickedness have fellowship with Thee,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">That frameth mischief by statute?</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">They gather themselves in troops against the soul of the righteous,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 10.5em;">And condemn the innocent blood."—<span class="smcap">Psalm</span> xciv. 20, 21.</span> -</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Though the mills of God grind slowly, yet they grind exceeding small;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Though with patience long He waiteth, with exactness grinds He all."<br /></span> -</div></div> - - -<p>Manasseh was born after Hezekiah's recovery -from his terrible illness. He was but twelve -years old when he began to reign. Of his mother -Hephzibah we know nothing, nor of the Zechariah who -was her father; but perhaps Isaiah in one passage -(lxii. 4) may refer to her name, "My delight is in -her."<a name="FNanchor_624_624" id="FNanchor_624_624"></a><a href="#Footnote_624_624" class="fnanchor">[624]</a> The son of Hezekiah and Hephzibah was the -worst of all the kings of Judah, and had the longest -reign.</p> - -<p>The tender age of Manasseh when he came to the -throne may perhaps account for the fact that the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_352" id="Page_352">[Pg 352]</a></span> -"forgetfulness" which his name implied<a name="FNanchor_625_625" id="FNanchor_625_625"></a><a href="#Footnote_625_625" class="fnanchor">[625]</a> was not a -forgetting of other sorrows, but of all that was noble -and righteous in the attempted reformation which had -been the main religious work of his father's life. In -Judah, as in England, a king was not supposed to be of -age until he was eighteen.<a name="FNanchor_626_626" id="FNanchor_626_626"></a><a href="#Footnote_626_626" class="fnanchor">[626]</a> For six years Manasseh -must have been to a great extent under the influence -of his regents and counsellors.</p> - -<p>There always existed in Jerusalem, even in the best -times, a heathenising party, and it was, unfortunately, -composed of princes and aristocrats who could bring -strong influence to bear upon the king.<a name="FNanchor_627_627" id="FNanchor_627_627"></a><a href="#Footnote_627_627" class="fnanchor">[627]</a> They did not -deny Jehovah, but they did not recognise Him as the -sole or the supreme God of heaven and earth. To -them He was the local deity of Israel and Judah. But -there were other gods, the gods of the nations, and -their aim always was to recognise the existence of -these deities and to pay homage to their power. If -their favour could not be purchased except by their -immediate votaries, at least their anger might be -averted. These politicians advocated a fatal and incongruous -syncretism, or at least an unlimited tolerance -for heathen idols, for which they could, unhappily, quote -the precepts and example of the Wise King, Solomon. -If any one questioned their views as a dangerous -idolatry, and an insult to</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Jehovah thundering out of Zion, throned<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Between the cherubim,"<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_353" id="Page_353">[Pg 353]</a></span></p> - -<p>they had but to point from the walls of Jerusalem to -the confronting summit of Olivet, where still remained -the shrines which the son of David had erected three -centuries earlier to Chemosh, and Milcom, and Ashtoreth, -who, since his day, had always found, even -in Jerusalem, some worshippers, open or secret, to -acknowledge their divinity.</p> - -<p>And these worldlings, in their tolerance for the -intolerable, could always appeal to two powerful -instincts of man's fallen nature—sensuality and fear—"lust -hard by hate." There was something in the -worship of Baal-Peor and of Moloch which appealed to -the undying ape and tiger in the unregenerate human -heart.</p> - -<p>The true worship of Jehovah is exactly that form -of religion which man finds it least easy to render to -Him—the religion of pure morality. Services, rites, -functions, look like religious diligence, and readily secure -a reverent outward devotion. Even self-maceration, -fasts, and flagellation are a cheap way of escaping the -"endless torments" which always loom so hugely in -terrifying superstition.</p> - -<p>Such superstitions are children of the fear and faithlessness -which hath torment. They are the corruptions -with which every form of false religion, and with which -also a corrupt and perverted Christianity, are always -tainted. And they demand the easy expiation of physical -ritual. But all the best and most spiritual teachers of -Scripture—alike the Hebrew Prophets and the Christian -Apostles—are at one with the Lord Christ in perpetual -insistence on the truth that "mercy is better than -sacrifice," and that true religion consists in that good -mind and good life which are the sole proof of genuine -sincerity.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_354" id="Page_354">[Pg 354]</a></span></p> - -<p>If Jehovah would but be contented with gifts, men -would gladly offer Him thousands of rams and tens -of thousands of rivers of oil. But the prophets taught -that He was above all mean bribes, and that such -offerings never could be anything to One whose were -all the beasts of the forests and the cattle upon a -thousand hills. It was not easy, then, to bribe such -a God, or to make Him a respecter of persons.</p> - -<p>How easy, again, would it be, if He would even -accept human sacrifices! A child was but a child. -How easy to kill a child, and place it in the brazen -arms which sloped over the fiery cistern! Moloch and -Chemosh were supremely to be won by such holocausts; -and surely Moloch and Chemosh must be lords of -power! But here again the prophets of Jehovah -stepped in, and said that it was of no avail with the -High, the Holy, the Merciful, to give even our firstborn -for our transgressions, or the fruit of the body for -the sin of the soul.</p> - -<p>Asceticism, then—occasional fasting, severe self-deprivations—surely -the gods would accept these? -And they were as nothing compared to the burden of -sin and the agony of conscience! Baal and Asherah -could command agonised devotees, and could approve -of them. By Jehovah and His prophets such bodily -service is discouraged and forbidden.</p> - -<p>Pleasure, then?—the consecration of the natural impulses, -the devotion in religious cultus of the passions -and appetites of the flesh—why should that be so -abhorrent to Jehovah? Other deities exulted in licentiousness. -Was not the temple of Astarte full of her -women-worshippers and of her eunuchs? Was there -no fascination in the voluptuous allurements, the -orgiastic dances, the stolen waters, the bread eaten in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_355" id="Page_355">[Pg 355]</a></span> -secret, when not only was the conscience lulled by the -removal therefrom of all sense of guilt and degradation, -but such orgies were even crowned with merit, as part -of an acceptable worship? After all, there was "a -fascination of corruption" in these idols of gold and -jewels, of lust and blood!</p> - -<p>How stern, how cold, how bare, by comparison, was -the moral law which only said, "Thou shalt not," and -emphasised its prohibition with the unalterable sanctions, -"This do, and thou shalt live"; "Do it not, -and thou shalt die"! What could they make of a -religion which was so eloquently silent as to the -meritoriousness of ritual?</p> - -<p>And how chill and simple and dreary was that which—according -to Micah—Jehovah had shown to be good, -and which He required of every man,—which was -nothing more than to do justly, and to love mercy, and -to walk humbly with God!</p> - -<p>And what right had the prophets—so asked these -apostates—to lord it over God's heritage in this way? -Solomon was the greatest king of Israel and Judah; -and Solomon had never been so exclusive in his -religionism, though he had built the Temple of the -Lord; nor Rehoboam; nor the great Phœnician Queen -Athaliah; nor the cultivated and sthetic Ahaz; nor, in -the kingdom of Israel, the lordly warrior Ahab; nor -the splendid and long-lived victor Jeroboam II. Had not -Manasseh plenty of examples of religious syncretism, to -which he might appeal in the joy of his youthful age?</p> - -<p>Not impossibly there lay in the background another -reason why the young king might be inclined to listen -to these evil counsellors. Micah may still have been -living; but of Isaiah we hear no more. Probably he -was dead. It is not recorded that he delivered any<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_356" id="Page_356">[Pg 356]</a></span> -prophecy during the reign of Manasseh, nor is it -certain that he outlived the former king. Tradition, -indeed, in later days, asserted that he had confronted -Manasseh, and been doomed to death; that he had -taken refuge in a cedar tree, and in that cedar had been -sawn asunder; but the tradition is wholly without a -vestige of authority. One of Micah's sternest oracles -was perhaps uttered in the days of Manasseh.<a name="FNanchor_628_628" id="FNanchor_628_628"></a><a href="#Footnote_628_628" class="fnanchor">[628]</a> But -Micah was only a provincial prophet of Moresheth-Gath. -He never moved in the midst of princes as Isaiah had -done, or possessed a tithe of the authority which had -rested for so many years on the shoulders of his -mighty contemporary.</p> - -<p>Moreover—so the heathen party might suggest—had -not Isaiah's prophecies been falsified by the result? -Had he not distinctly promised and pledged his credit -to two things? and had not both turned out to be -unworthy of reliance?</p> - -<p>i. Surely he had prophesied the utter downfall of -the Assyrians. And it was true that after his disaster -on the confines of Egypt, Sennacherib had fled in haste -to Nineveh, and his occupations with rebels on his own -frontiers had left Judah unmolested, and he had been -murdered by his sons. But, on the other hand, in no -sense of the word had Assyria fallen. On the contrary, -she had never been more powerful. Not one of his -predecessors had seemed more irresistible than Esarhaddon. -He was undisputed king of Babylon and of -Nineveh. There would be no more embassies from -Merodach-Baladan, or any revolted viceroy! And -rumour would early begin to narrate that Esarhaddon -had not forgotten the catastrophe at Pelusium, but<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_357" id="Page_357">[Pg 357]</a></span> -intended to avenge it, and to teach Egypt the forgotten -lessons of Raphia (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 720) and Altaqu (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 701).</p> - -<p>ii. And as for Judah, where was the golden Messianic -age which Isaiah had promised? Where did they see -the Divine Prince whom he had foretold, or the lion -lying down with the lamb, and the child laying his -hand on the cockatrice's den?</p> - -<p>All this, they would argue, had greatly shaken -Isaiah's prophetic authority. Judah was a mere vassal—safe -only in so far as she remained a vassal, and did -not join Tyre or any other rebellious power, but abode -safe under the shadow of Assyria's mighty wings.</p> - -<p>Was it not, then, as well to look facts in the face? -to accept things as they were? And—so they would -argue, with false plausibility—since the triumph, after -all, had remained with the gods of the nations, might -it not be as well to dethrone Jehovah from His exclusive -dominion, and at least to propitiate the potent and -less-exacting deities, the charming <i>D faciles</i> who smiled -at lewd aberrations, and even flung over them the -glamour of devotion?</p> - -<p>With these bolder renegades would be the whole -body of the priests of the <i>bamoth</i>. Those old sanctuaries -had been repressed by Hezekiah without any -compensation; for in those days life-interests were -little, or not at all, regarded. Multitudes of priests and -Levites must have been flung out of employment and -reduced to poverty by the recent religious revolution. -It is not likely that they bore without a murmur the -obliteration of forms of worship sanctioned by immemorial -custom, or that they made no efforts to procure -the re-establishment of what the people loved.</p> - -<p>Thus a vast weight of evil influence was brought to -bear upon the boy-king; and it was also the more<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_358" id="Page_358">[Pg 358]</a></span> -powerful because repeated indications exist that, while -the king was nominally a despot, and was surrounded -with external observance, the real control of affairs -was, to a large extent, in the hands of an aristocracy -of priests and princes, except when the king was a man -of great personal force.</p> - -<p>Manasseh went over to these retrogressionists heart -and soul, and he contentedly remained a tributary of -Assyria. Even when Esarhaddon's forces marched to the -chastisement of Egypt, he felt secure in his allegiance -to the dominant tyrant of Babylon and Nineveh, whose -interest it would be not to disturb a faithful subject.</p> - -<p>There followed a reaction, an absolute rebound from -the old monotheistic strictness and righteousness. The -nation emancipated itself from the moral law as with -a shout of relief, and plunged into superstition and -licentiousness. The reign of Manasseh resembled at -once the recrudescence of Popery in the reign of Mary -Tudor, with its rekindling of the fires of Smithfield, -and the foul orgies of debauchery at the Restoration of -1660, when human nature, loving degraded licence -better than strenuous liberty, flung away the noble -freedom of Puritanism for the loathly mysteries of -Cotytto. The age of Manasseh resembled that of -Charles II., in the famous description of Lord Macaulay. -"Then came days never to be recalled without a blush, -the days of servitude without loyalty, and sensuality -without love, of dwarfish talents and gigantic vices, the -paradise of cold hearts and narrow minds, the golden -age of the coward, the bigot, and the slave. In every -high place worship was paid to Belial and Moloch, and -England propitiated these obscene and cruel idols with -the blood of her best and bravest children." Sensuous -intoxication is in all cases closely connected with<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_359" id="Page_359">[Pg 359]</a></span> -fiendish cruelty, and the introducer of voluptuous -idolatries naturally became the first persecutor of the -true religion.</p> - -<p>1. The first step of the king, and probably the one -which the people welcomed most, was the restoration -of the chapelries under the trees and on the hills, which, -more strenuously than any of his predecessors, Hezekiah -had at least attempted to put down. For this step -Manasseh might have pleaded the sanction of ages -to which the Book of Deuteronomy had either been -wholly unknown, or during which its laws had become -as utterly forgotten as though they had never existed. -To many worshippers these old shrines had become -extremely precious. They felt it to be either an actual -impossibility, or at the best intolerably burdensome, to -make their way by long, dreary, and difficult journeys -to Jerusalem, when they desired to pay the most -ordinary rites of worship. They knew no reason, and -had never known of any reason, why Jehovah should -be worshipped in one Temple only. All their religious -instincts led them the other way. They could point to -the example of all the highly honoured saints who had -worshipped God at Gilgal, Shechem, Bethel, Hebron, -Beersheba, Kedesh, Gibeah, and many another shrine; -and of all the saintly kings who had not dreamt of -interfering with such free worship. Why should -Jerusalem monopolise all sanctity? It might be a -politic view for kings to maintain, and highly profitable -for priests to establish; but none of their great prophets, -not even the princely Isaiah, had said one syllable -against the innocent high places of Jehovah. In those -days there were no synagogues. The extinction of the -high places doubtless seemed to many of the people an -extinction of religion in daily life, and they were more<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_360" id="Page_360">[Pg 360]</a></span> -than half disposed to agree with the Rabshakeh that -Jehovah was offended by what they regarded as a -burdensome, unwise, and sweeping innovation.—If it -be necessary to answer arguments which might have -seemed natural, against a custom which might have -seemed innocent, it must suffice to say that it was the -chief mission of Israel to keep alive among the nations -of the world the knowledge of the One True God, and -that, amid the constant temptations to accept the gods -of the heathen as they were adored in groves and on -high places, the faith of Israel could no longer be kept -pure except by the Deuteronomic institution of one -central and exclusive shrine.</p> - -<p>2. But Manasseh did far worse than rehabilitate -the worship at the high places which his father had -discouraged. "He reared up altars for Baal,<a name="FNanchor_629_629" id="FNanchor_629_629"></a><a href="#Footnote_629_629" class="fnanchor">[629]</a> and made -an Asherah, as did Ahab, King of Israel." This was -the first bad element of the new cosmopolitan eclecticism. -It involved the acceptance of the Phœnician nature-worship -with its manifold abominations. The people had -grown familiar with it under Athaliah (2 Kings xi. 18), -and under Ahaz (2 Chron. xxviii. 2); but Manasseh, -as we infer from the account given of Josiah's reformation, -had gone further than either. He had actually -ventured to introduce the image of Baal into the -Temple, and to set up the Asherah-pillar in front of -it (2 Kings xxiii. 4). Worse even than this, he had<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_361" id="Page_361">[Pg 361]</a></span> -erected in the very Temple (<i>id.</i> 7) houses devoted to -the execrable <i>Qedeshim</i> (Vulg., <i>effeminati</i>), in which also -the women wove broidered hangings to adorn the -shrines of the idol image, as in the worship of the -Assyrian Mylitta.<a name="FNanchor_630_630" id="FNanchor_630_630"></a><a href="#Footnote_630_630" class="fnanchor">[630]</a> He, at the same time, displaced -the altar and removed the Ark. To the latter circumstances -is perhaps due the Rabbinic legend that -Hezekiah hid the Ark till the coming of the Messiah.</p> - -<p>3. To this Phœnician worship he added Sabaism, -the worship of the stars, "all the host of heaven, -whom he served." This was an entirely new phase of -idolatry, unknown to the Hebrews till they came in -contact with Assyria.<a name="FNanchor_631_631" id="FNanchor_631_631"></a><a href="#Footnote_631_631" class="fnanchor">[631]</a> It came rapidly into vogue, and -exercised over their imaginations the spell of a seductive -novelty, as we see from the strong testimony of -the prophet Jeremiah.<a name="FNanchor_632_632" id="FNanchor_632_632"></a><a href="#Footnote_632_632" class="fnanchor">[632]</a> This is why it is so emphatically -forbidden in the Book of Deuteronomy.<a name="FNanchor_633_633" id="FNanchor_633_633"></a><a href="#Footnote_633_633" class="fnanchor">[633]</a> The -king built altars to the stars of the Zodiac (<i>Mazzaroth</i>), -both in the outer court of the Temple, and in the court -of the priests, and on these altars incense or victims -were continually burned. He also introduced or encouraged -the introduction into the Temple precincts of -the horses and chariots dedicated to the sun.<a name="FNanchor_634_634" id="FNanchor_634_634"></a><a href="#Footnote_634_634" class="fnanchor">[634]</a></p> - -<p>When we read of the actual invasion of the Temple-precincts -in this as in preceding and subsequent reigns,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_362" id="Page_362">[Pg 362]</a></span> -we cannot but ask, Were these atrocities committed with -the sanction or with the connivance of the priests? -We are not told. Yet how can it have been otherwise? -If the high priest Azariah could muster eighty priests -to oppose King Uzziah, when he merely wished to -burn incense in the Temple, as Solomon had done -before him, and as Ahaz did after him—if Jehoiada -could, according to the Chronicler, muster a perfect -army of priests and Levites to dethrone Athaliah, and -could so stir up the people that they rose <i>en masse</i> to -tear down the temple of Baal, and slay Mattan, his -high priest,—how was it possible for Manasseh to perpetrate -these flagrant acts of idolatrous apostasy, if the -priests were all ranged in opposition to his power? -Was their authority suddenly paralysed? Did their -influence with the people shrivel into nothing when -Hezekiah had been carried to his tomb? Or did these -priests follow the easy and profitable course which -they seem to have followed throughout the whole -history of the kings without an exception?—did they -simply answer the kings according to their idols?</p> - -<p>4. Another, and the most hideous, element of the new -mixture of cults was the reintroduction of the ancient -Canaanite worship of Moloch with its human sacrifices. -Manasseh, like Ahaz, made his son or, according to -the Chronicler and the Septuagint, "his sons"—pass -through the fire to this grim Ammonite idol in Tophet -of the Valley of Hinnom, so as to leave no chance -untried. And herein he was far more inexcusable than -his grandfather; for Ahaz had at least been driven by -desperate extremity to this last expedient, but Manasseh -was living, if not in prosperity, at least in unbroken -peace. Moreover, he not only did this himself, but did -his utmost to make a popular institution of children-sacrifice,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_363" id="Page_363">[Pg 363]</a></span> -so that many practised it in the dreadful -valley and amid the rocks outside Jerusalem.<a name="FNanchor_635_635" id="FNanchor_635_635"></a><a href="#Footnote_635_635" class="fnanchor">[635]</a></p> - -<p>5. Even this did not suffice him. To these Assyrian, -Phœnician, and Canaanite elements of idolatry he -added Babylonian novelties. He practised augury, and -used enchantments, and he dealt with familiar spirits -and wizards, as though without Egyptian necromancy -and Mesopotamian shamanism his eclectic worship -would be incomplete.<a name="FNanchor_636_636" id="FNanchor_636_636"></a><a href="#Footnote_636_636" class="fnanchor">[636]</a></p> - -<p>6. Thus "he wrought much wickedness in the sight -of the Lord to provoke Him to anger." He placed a -graven image of his Asherah inside the Temple, and -utterly profaned the sacred house, and seduced his -people "to do more evil than did the nations whom -the Lord destroyed before the children of Israel."</p> - -<p>Whatever was the conduct of the priests, the -prophets were not silent. They denounced Manasseh -for having done worse than even the ancient Amorites, -and declared that, in consequence of his crimes, God -would bring upon Jerusalem such evil as would cause -both the ears of him that heard it to tingle;<a name="FNanchor_637_637" id="FNanchor_637_637"></a><a href="#Footnote_637_637" class="fnanchor">[637]</a> that he -would stretch over Jerusalem for ruin the line and the -level of Ahab;<a name="FNanchor_638_638" id="FNanchor_638_638"></a><a href="#Footnote_638_638" class="fnanchor">[638]</a> that He would cast off even the remnant, -and deliver them to their enemies; that He would wipe -out Jerusalem "as a man wipeth a dish, wiping and -turning it upside down."<a name="FNanchor_639_639" id="FNanchor_639_639"></a><a href="#Footnote_639_639" class="fnanchor">[639]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_364" id="Page_364">[Pg 364]</a></span></p> - -<p>The finest oracles of Micah (vi. 1-vii. 7) were -probably uttered in the reign of Manasseh, and give -the simplest and purest expression to the supremacy -of morality as the one true end and test of religion. -Micah is as indifferent as the Decalogue to all claims -of rites, ceremonies, and outward worship. "Jehovah -demands nothing for Himself; all that He asks is for -man: this is the fundamental law of the theocracy."</p> - -<p>The apostasies of the king and the denunciation of -the prophets thus came into fierce collision, and led -naturally to persecution and bloodshed. Perhaps in -Mic. vii. 1-7 we catch the echoes of the Reign of -Terror. The king resorted to violence, using, no doubt, -the tyrant's devilish plea of necessity. He made blood -run like water in the streets of Jerusalem from end to -end,<a name="FNanchor_640_640" id="FNanchor_640_640"></a><a href="#Footnote_640_640" class="fnanchor">[640]</a> and in the exaggerated phrase of Josephus, was -<i>daily</i> slaying the prophets.<a name="FNanchor_641_641" id="FNanchor_641_641"></a><a href="#Footnote_641_641" class="fnanchor">[641]</a> It was during this persecution, -according to Rabbinic tradition, that Isaiah -received the martyr's crown.<a name="FNanchor_642_642" id="FNanchor_642_642"></a><a href="#Footnote_642_642" class="fnanchor">[642]</a></p> - -<p>And no miracles were wrought to save the martyrs. -Elijah and Elisha had been surrounded with a blaze of -miracles, but in Judah no prophet arose who could so -wield the power of Heaven.</p> - -<p>At this point the narrative of the historian about -Manasseh ends. If he shared the current opinion of -his day, which connected individual and national prosperity<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_365" id="Page_365">[Pg 365]</a></span> -with well-doing, and regarded length of days as a -sign of the favour of Heaven, while, on the other hand, -misfortune and misery invariably resulted from the -wrath of Jehovah, he could not have been otherwise -than surprised, and perhaps even pained, to have to -relate that Manasseh reigned fifty-five years. Not -only was his reign longer than that of any other king -of Israel or Judah; not only did he attain a greater -age than any of them; but, further, no calamity seems -to have marked his rule. A contented and protected -vassal of Esarhaddon, secure from his attacks, and -also unmolested by the weakened and subjugated -nations around him, he would seem, in the story of the -Kings, to have enjoyed an enviable external lot, and to -have presided over a people who were happy, in that, -during his rule, they had no history. But whatever -the writer may have felt, he tells us no more, and lets -us see Manasseh sink peacefully into his grave "in the -garden of his own house, in the garden of Uzza," -and leave to his son Amon a peaceful realm and an -undisputed crown. Such a career would undoubtedly -perplex and confound all the preconceived opinions of -Jewish orthodoxy. The prosperity of Manasseh would -have presented as great a problem to them as the -miseries of Job. They looked to temporal prosperity -as the reward of righteousness, and to acute misery as -the retribution of apostasy and sin. They had little -or no conception of a future which should redress the -balance of apparent earthly inequalities. Alike the -sight of Manasseh's long reign and Josiah's undeserved -death in battle would give a powerful shock to their -fixed convictions.</p> - -<p>Far different is the end of the story in the Book of -Chronicles. The records of Esarhaddon tell us that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_366" id="Page_366">[Pg 366]</a></span> -in 680 he made an expedition into Palestine to restore -the shaken influence of his father,<a name="FNanchor_643_643" id="FNanchor_643_643"></a><a href="#Footnote_643_643" class="fnanchor">[643]</a> and about 647 he -mentions among his submissive tributaries the kings -of Tyre, Edom, Moab, Gaza, Ekron, Askelon, Gebal, -Ammon, Ashdod, and Manasseh, King of Judah -("Minasi-sar-Yahudi"), as well as ten princes of -Cyprus. Whether the King of Judah rebelled later -on, and intrigued with Tirhakah, we do not know; -but in 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11 we read that Esarhaddon -sent his generals to Jerusalem, took Manasseh by -stratagem, drove rings through his lips, bound him in -chains, and brought him to Babylon, where Esarhaddon -was holding his court.<a name="FNanchor_644_644" id="FNanchor_644_644"></a><a href="#Footnote_644_644" class="fnanchor">[644]</a> We find from the <i>Eponym -Canon</i> that Tyre revolted from Assyria in the tenth -year of Esarhaddon, and Manasseh may have been -drawn away to join in the revolt; or he may have -joined Shamash-shum-ukn, the Viceroy of Babylon, in -his revolt against his brother Assurbanipal. As a rule, -the lot of a conquered vassal at the Assyrian Court was -horrible, and in his utter misery Manasseh repented, -humbled himself, and prayed.<a name="FNanchor_645_645" id="FNanchor_645_645"></a><a href="#Footnote_645_645" class="fnanchor">[645]</a> His prayer was heard. -The despots of Nineveh were capricious alike in their<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_367" id="Page_367">[Pg 367]</a></span> -insults and in their favours, and Esarhaddon not only -pardoned Manasseh, but sent him back to Jerusalem,<a name="FNanchor_646_646" id="FNanchor_646_646"></a><a href="#Footnote_646_646" class="fnanchor">[646]</a> -thinking that he would be more useful to him there than -in a Babylonian dungeon. After this reprieve he lived -like a penitent and a patriot. Esarhaddon was preparing -for his expedition against Tirhakah, and would not attack -a king who was now bound to him by gratitude as well -as fear. But the times were very troublous. Manasseh -prepared for eventualities by building an outer wall on -the west of the city of David, unto Gihon in the Valley, -by surrounding Ophel with a high wall, and by garrisoning -the fenced cities.<a name="FNanchor_647_647" id="FNanchor_647_647"></a><a href="#Footnote_647_647" class="fnanchor">[647]</a> All this was necessary and -patriotic work, considering that Judah might be attacked -by other enemies as well as the Assyrians. She was -like a grain of corn amid the grinding mills of the -nations. Media and Lydia were rising into strong -kingdoms. Babylon was becoming daily more formidable. -Dim rumours reached the East of movements -among vast hosts of Cimmerian and Scythian barbarians. -Jerusalem had no human strength for war. She could -only rely upon her battlements, on the natural strength -of her position, and on the protection of her God. -Almost in the last year of Manasseh, the powerful -Psammetichus I., king of a now united Egypt, made an -assault on Ashdod; but he did not venture on the -difficult task of besieging Jerusalem.</p> - -<p>The religious reformation of Manasseh attested the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_368" id="Page_368">[Pg 368]</a></span> -sincerity of his amendment. He flung out the Asherah -from the Temple, put away the strange gods, destroyed -the altars, burnt sacrifices to God, and used all his -power to restore the worship of Jehovah. He did not, -however, destroy the high places. For this story the -Chronicler refers to "the words of Chozai,"<a name="FNanchor_648_648" id="FNanchor_648_648"></a><a href="#Footnote_648_648" class="fnanchor">[648]</a> according -to the present text, which some suppose to have meant -"the story of the Seers." He also refers to a prayer -of Manasseh, which cannot of course be the Greek -forgery of the second or third century which goes by -that name in the Apocrypha.<a name="FNanchor_649_649" id="FNanchor_649_649"></a><a href="#Footnote_649_649" class="fnanchor">[649]</a> His repentance doubtless -secured his own salvation. "Whoso saith 'Manasseh -hath no part in the world to come,'" said Rabbi -Johanan, "discourageth the penitent";—but the partial -reformation was too late to save his land.</p> - -<p>Is this a literal history, or an edifying Haggadah? -The non-historical character of the story is maintained -by De Wette, Graf, Nldeke, and many others. Both -views have been taken. This we can, at any rate, -assert—that there seems to be nothing in the story -which is inconsistent with probability. The Chronicler -may have derived it from genuine documents or traditions, -though it is difficult to account for the silence of -the elder and more trustworthy historian. Nor is it -only his silence for which we have to account; it is -the continuance of his positive statements. It would<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_369" id="Page_369">[Pg 369]</a></span> -be, in any case, a strange conception of history which, -after narrating a man's crimes, omitted alike the retribution -which befell him on account of them, the heartfelt -penitence for the sake of which they were forgiven, and -the seriously earnest endeavour to undo at least something -of the evil which he had done. Not only does -the historian make these omissions, but in no subsequent -allusion to Manasseh does he so much as indicate -that he is aware of his amendment.<a name="FNanchor_650_650" id="FNanchor_650_650"></a><a href="#Footnote_650_650" class="fnanchor">[650]</a> He says that -Amon "did evil in the sight of the Lord, as his father -Manasseh did."<a name="FNanchor_651_651" id="FNanchor_651_651"></a><a href="#Footnote_651_651" class="fnanchor">[651]</a> He speaks of the altars to the hosts -of heaven which Manasseh had made in the two courts -of the Temple as still standing in the reign of Josiah, -though the Chronicler tells us that Manasseh had cast -them all out of the city.<a name="FNanchor_652_652" id="FNanchor_652_652"></a><a href="#Footnote_652_652" class="fnanchor">[652]</a> He says that, notwithstanding -all that Josiah did, "the Lord turned not from the -fierceness of His great wrath, because of all the provocations -that Manasseh had provoked Him withal,"<a name="FNanchor_653_653" id="FNanchor_653_653"></a><a href="#Footnote_653_653" class="fnanchor">[653]</a> and -that on this account God cast off Jerusalem. Never, -even by the most distant allusions, does he refer to -Manasseh's captivity, his prayer, his penitence, or his -counter-efforts. Had he been aware of these, his -silence would have been neither generous nor just. -Nay, he even leaves apparent facts at conflict with the -Chronicler's story, for he makes Josiah do all that the -Chronicler tells us that Manasseh himself had done in -the removal of his worst abominations.</p> - -<p>Even now we have not exhausted the historic difficulties -which surround the repentance of Manasseh. -During his reign Jeremiah received his call, and while -still a young boy began his work. Neither he, nor -Zephaniah, nor Habakkuk drop the slightest hint that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_370" id="Page_370">[Pg 370]</a></span> -the wicked, idolatrous king had ever turned over a new -leaf. Jeremiah's silence is specially difficult to account -for. He, too, records Jehovah's final and irrevocable -decree, that He would give up Judah to death, to exile, -and to famine, to the sword to slay, to the dogs to tear, -to the fowls of the heaven and the beasts of the earth -to devour and to destroy.<a name="FNanchor_654_654" id="FNanchor_654_654"></a><a href="#Footnote_654_654" class="fnanchor">[654]</a> And the cause of the -pitiless doom pronounced by a Judge weary of repenting -is "because of Manasseh, the son of Hezekiah, -King of Judah, for that which he did in Jerusalem."<a name="FNanchor_655_655" id="FNanchor_655_655"></a><a href="#Footnote_655_655" class="fnanchor">[655]</a></p> - -<p>The judgment was not long delayed.</p> - -<p>It was the vast movement of the Scythians in Media -and Western Asia, and the rumours of it, which gave -to Manasseh and Amon such respite as they had; and -even this respite was full of misery and fear.<a name="FNanchor_656_656" id="FNanchor_656_656"></a><a href="#Footnote_656_656" class="fnanchor">[656]</a></p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_371" id="Page_371">[Pg 371]</a></span></p> - - -<h3><i>AMON</i><a name="FNanchor_657_657" id="FNanchor_657_657"></a><a href="#Footnote_657_657" class="fnanchor">[657]</a></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 641-639</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xxi. 19-26</h4> - -<p>The brief reign of Amon is only a sort of unimportant -and miserable annex to that of his father. As he was -twenty-two years old when he began to reign, he must -have witnessed the repentance and reforming zeal of -his father, if, in spite of all difficulties, we assume that -narrative to be historical. In that case, however, the -young man was wholly untouched by the latter phase -of Manasseh's life, and flung himself headlong into the -career of the king's earlier idolatries. "He walked -in all the way that his father walked in, and served the -idols that his father served, and worshipped them"—which -was the more extraordinary if Manasseh's last -acts had been to dethrone and destroy these strange -gods. He even "multiplied trespass," so that in his -son's reign we find every form of abomination as -triumphant as though Manasseh had never attempted -to check the tide of evil. We know nothing more of -Amon. Apparently he only reigned two years.<a name="FNanchor_658_658" id="FNanchor_658_658"></a><a href="#Footnote_658_658" class="fnanchor">[658]</a> He -is the only Jewish king who bears the name of a -foreign—an Egyptian—deity.</p> - -<p>For pictures of the state of things in this reign we -may look to the prophets Zephaniah and Jeremiah, and -they are forced to use the darkest colours.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_372" id="Page_372">[Pg 372]</a></span></p> - -<p>This is Zephaniah's picture:—</p> - -<p> -"Woe to her that is rebellious and polluted, to the oppressing city!<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">She obeyed not the voice; she received not instruction;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">She trusted not in the Lord; she drew not near to her God.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Her princes in the midst of her are roaring lions;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Her judges are evening wolves; they gnaw not the bones on the morrow.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Her prophets are light and treacherous persons:</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Her priests have profaned the sanctuary, they have done violence to the law."<a name="FNanchor_659_659" id="FNanchor_659_659"></a><a href="#Footnote_659_659" class="fnanchor">[659]</a></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>He tells us that Baal and his black-robed <i>chemarim</i><a name="FNanchor_660_660" id="FNanchor_660_660"></a><a href="#Footnote_660_660" class="fnanchor">[660]</a> -are still prevalent—that men worshipped on their house-tops -the host of heaven, and swore by "Moloch their -king." Therefore would God search Jerusalem with -candles, and would visit the men who had sunk, like -thick wine on the lees, and who said in their infidel -hearts, "Jehovah will not do good, neither will He do -evil." He is an Epicurean God, a cypher, a <i>fainant</i>. -"Men make all kinds of fine calculations," says Luther, -"but the Lord God says to them, 'For whom, then, do -you hold Me? For a cypher? Do I sit here in vain, -and to no purpose? You shall know that I will turn -their accounts about finely, and make them all false -reckonings.'"</p> - -<p>Not less dark is the view of Jeremiah.<a name="FNanchor_661_661" id="FNanchor_661_661"></a><a href="#Footnote_661_661" class="fnanchor">[661]</a> Like -Diogenes in Athens, Jeremiah in vain searches Jerusalem -for a faithful man. Among the poor he finds -brutish obstinacy, among the rich insolent defiance.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_373" id="Page_373">[Pg 373]</a></span> -They were like fed horses in the morning—lecherous -and unruly. They are slanderers, adulterers, corrupters, -murderers. They worship Baal and strange -gods. "They set a trap, they catch men. As a cage -is full of birds, so are their houses full of deceit. They -are waxen fat, they shine; yea, they overpass in deeds of -wickedness."<a name="FNanchor_662_662" id="FNanchor_662_662"></a><a href="#Footnote_662_662" class="fnanchor">[662]</a> "An astonishment and horror is done -in the land; the prophets prophesy falsely, and the -priests bear rule by their means; and My people love -to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?"<a name="FNanchor_663_663" id="FNanchor_663_663"></a><a href="#Footnote_663_663" class="fnanchor">[663]</a></p> - -<p>"From the least of them even unto the greatest of -them every one is given to covetousness; and from -the prophet even unto the priest every one dealeth -falsely. They have treated also the hurt of My people -lightly, saying, 'Peace, peace,' when there is no peace. -Were they ashamed when they had committed abominations? -Nay, they were not at all ashamed, neither -could they blush: therefore shall they fall among them -that fall."<a name="FNanchor_664_664" id="FNanchor_664_664"></a><a href="#Footnote_664_664" class="fnanchor">[664]</a></p> - -<p>The wretched reign ended wretchedly. Amon met -the fate of Amaziah and of Joash. He was murdered -by conspirators—by some of his own courtiers—in his -own palace. He was not the victim of any general -rebellion. The people of the land were apparently -content with the existent idolatry, which left them free -for lives of lust and luxury, of greed and gain. They -resented the disorder introduced by an intrigue of -eunuchs or court officials. They rose and slew the -whole band of conspirators. Amon was buried with -his father in the new burial-place of the Kings in the -garden of Uzza, and the people placed his son Josiah—a -child of eight years old—upon the throne.</p> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_374" id="Page_374">[Pg 374]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXX" id="CHAPTER_XXX">CHAPTER XXX</a></h2> - -<h3><i>JOSIAH</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 639-608<a name="FNanchor_665_665" id="FNanchor_665_665"></a><a href="#Footnote_665_665" class="fnanchor">[665]</a></h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xii., xxiii</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"Τὴν δὲ φύσιν αὐτὸς ἄριστος ὑπῆρχε καὶ πρὸς ἀρετὴν εὗ γεγονώς."—Jos., -<i>Antt.</i>, iv. 1.</p></blockquote> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i6">"In outline dim and vast<br /></span> -<span class="i7">Their fearful shadows cast<br /></span> -<span class="i0">The giant forms of Empires, on their way<br /></span> -<span class="i7">To ruin: one by one<br /></span> -<span class="i7">They tower, and they are gone."<br /></span> -<span class="i35"><span class="smcap">Keble.</span><br /></span> -</div></div> - - -<p>If we are to understand the reign of Josiah as a -whole, we must preface it by some allusion to the -great epoch-marking circumstances of his age, which -explain the references of contemporary prophets, and -which, in great measure, determined the foreign policy -of the pious king.</p> - -<p>The three memorable events of this brief epoch -were, (I.) the movement of the Scythians, (II.) the rise -of Babylon, and (III.) the humiliation of Nineveh, -followed by her total destruction.</p> - -<p>I. Many of Jeremiah's earlier prophecies belong to -this period, and we see that both he and Zephaniah—who -was probably a great-great-grandson of King<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_375" id="Page_375">[Pg 375]</a></span> -Hezekiah himself,<a name="FNanchor_666_666" id="FNanchor_666_666"></a><a href="#Footnote_666_666" class="fnanchor">[666]</a> and prophesied in this reign<a name="FNanchor_667_667" id="FNanchor_667_667"></a><a href="#Footnote_667_667" class="fnanchor">[667]</a>—are -greatly occupied with a danger from the North which -seems to threaten universal ruin.</p> - -<p>So overwhelming is the peril that Zephaniah begins -with the tremendously sweeping menace, "<i>I will utterly -consume all things off the earth</i>, saith the Lord."</p> - -<p>Then the curse rushes down specifically upon Judah -and Jerusalem; and the state of things which the -prophet describes shows that, if Josiah began himself -to seek the Lord at eight years old, he did not take—and -was, perhaps, unable to take—any active steps -towards the extinction of idolatry till he was old -enough to hold in his own hand the reins of power.</p> - -<p>For Zephaniah denounces the wrath of Jehovah on -three classes of idolaters—viz., (1) the remnant of Baal-worshippers -with their <i>chemarim</i>, or unlawful priests, -and the syncretising priests (<i>kohanim</i>) of Jehovah, who -combine His worship with that of the stars, to whom -they burn incense upon the housetops; (2) the waverers, -who swear at once by Jehovah and by Malcham, their king; -and (3) the open despisers and apostates. For -all these the day of Jehovah is near; He has prepared -them for sacrifice, and the sacrificers are at -hand.<a name="FNanchor_668_668" id="FNanchor_668_668"></a><a href="#Footnote_668_668" class="fnanchor">[668]</a> Gaza, Ashdod, Askelon, Ekron, the Cherethites,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_376" id="Page_376">[Pg 376]</a></span> -Canaan, Philistia, are all threatened by the same impending -ruin, as well as Moab and Ammon, who shall -lose their lands. Ethiopia, too, and Assyria shall be -smitten, and Nineveh shall become so complete a -desolation that "pelicans and hedgehogs shall bivouac -upon her chapiters, the owl shall hoot in her windows, -and the crow croak upon the threshold, 'Crushed! -desolated!' and all that pass by shall hiss and wag -their hands."<a name="FNanchor_669_669" id="FNanchor_669_669"></a><a href="#Footnote_669_669" class="fnanchor">[669]</a></p> - -<p>The pictures of the state of society drawn by Jeremiah -do not, as we have seen, differ from those drawn -by his contemporary.<a name="FNanchor_670_670" id="FNanchor_670_670"></a><a href="#Footnote_670_670" class="fnanchor">[670]</a> Jeremiah, too, writing perhaps -before Josiah's reformation, complains that God's people -have forsaken the fountains of living water, to hew -out for themselves broken cisterns. He complains of -empty formalism in the place of true righteousness, and -even goes so far as to say that backsliding Israel has -shown herself more righteous than treacherous Judah -(iii. 1-11). He, too, prophesies speedy and terrific chastisement. -Let Judah gather herself into fenced cities, -and save her goods by flight, for God is bringing evil -from the North, and a great destruction.<a name="FNanchor_671_671" id="FNanchor_671_671"></a><a href="#Footnote_671_671" class="fnanchor">[671]</a></p> - -<p>"The lion is come up from his thicket, and the -destroyer of the nations is on his way; he is gone -forth from his place to make thy land desolate; and -thy cities shall be laid waste, without an inhabitant. -Behold, he cometh as clouds, and his chariots shall be -as the whirlwind." Besiegers come from a far country, -and give out their voice against the cities of Judah.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_377" id="Page_377">[Pg 377]</a></span> -The heart of the kings shall perish, and the heart of -the princes; and the priests shall be astonished, and -the prophets shall wonder.</p> - -<p>"For thus hath the Lord said, The whole land shall -be desolate; yet will I not make a full end"—and, "O -Jerusalem, wash thine heart from wickedness, that thou -mayest be saved!"<a name="FNanchor_672_672" id="FNanchor_672_672"></a><a href="#Footnote_672_672" class="fnanchor">[672]</a></p> - -<p>"I will bring a nation upon you from far, O House -of Israel, saith the Lord: it is a mighty nation, it is -an ancient nation, a nation whose language"—unlike -that of the Assyrians—"thou knowest not, neither -understandest what they say. Their quiver is an open -sepulchre, they are all mighty men. They shall batter -thy fenced cities, in which thou trustest with weapons -of war."<a name="FNanchor_673_673" id="FNanchor_673_673"></a><a href="#Footnote_673_673" class="fnanchor">[673]</a></p> - -<p>"O ye children of Benjamin, save your goods by -flight: for evil is imminent from the North, and a great -destruction. Behold, a people cometh from the North -Country, and a great nation shall be raised from the -farthest part of the earth. They lay hold on bow and -spear; they are cruel, and have no mercy; their voice -roareth like the sea; and they ride upon horses, set in -array as men for war against thee, O daughter of Zion. -We have heard the fame thereof: our hands wax feeble."<a name="FNanchor_674_674" id="FNanchor_674_674"></a><a href="#Footnote_674_674" class="fnanchor">[674]</a></p> - -<p>And the judgment is close at hand. The early -blossoming bud of the almond tree is the type of its -imminence. The seething caldron, with its front turned -from the North, typifies an invasion which shall soon -boil over and flood the land.<a name="FNanchor_675_675" id="FNanchor_675_675"></a><a href="#Footnote_675_675" class="fnanchor">[675]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_378" id="Page_378">[Pg 378]</a></span></p> - -<p>What was the fierce people thus vaguely indicated -as coming from the North? The foes indicated in -these passages are not the long-familiar Assyrians, but -the Scythians and Cimmerians.<a name="FNanchor_676_676" id="FNanchor_676_676"></a><a href="#Footnote_676_676" class="fnanchor">[676]</a></p> - -<p>As yet the Hebrews had only heard of them by dim -and distant rumour. When Ezekiel prophesied they -were still an object of terror, but he foresees their -defeat and annihilation. They should be gathered into -the confines of Israel, but only for their destruction.<a name="FNanchor_677_677" id="FNanchor_677_677"></a><a href="#Footnote_677_677" class="fnanchor">[677]</a> -The prophet is bidden to set his face towards Gog, of -the land of Magog, the Prince of Rosh,<a name="FNanchor_678_678" id="FNanchor_678_678"></a><a href="#Footnote_678_678" class="fnanchor">[678]</a> Meshech, and -Tubal, and prophesy against him that God would turn -him about, and put hooks in his jaws, and drive forth -all his army of bucklered and sworded horsemen, the -hordes of the uttermost part of the North. They -should come like a storm upon the mountains of Israel, -and spoil the defenceless villages; but they should -come simply for their own destruction by blood and -by pestilence. God should smite their bows out of -their left hands, and their arrows out of the right, and -the ravenous birds of Israel should feed upon the -carcases of their warriors. There should be endless<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_379" id="Page_379">[Pg 379]</a></span> -bonfires of all the instruments of war, and the place -of their burial should be called "the valley of the -multitude of Gog."</p> - -<p>Much of this is doubtless an ideal picture, and Ezekiel -may be thinking of the fall of the Chaldans. But the -terms he uses remind us of the dim Northern nomads, -and the names Rosh and Meshech in juxtaposition -involuntarily recall those of Russia and Moscow.<a name="FNanchor_679_679" id="FNanchor_679_679"></a><a href="#Footnote_679_679" class="fnanchor">[679]</a></p> - -<p>Our chief historical authority respecting this influx -of Northern barbarians is Herodotus.<a name="FNanchor_680_680" id="FNanchor_680_680"></a><a href="#Footnote_680_680" class="fnanchor">[680]</a> He tells us -that the nomad Scythians, apparently a Turanian race, -who may have been subjected to the pressure of -population, swarmed over the Caucasus, dispossessed -the Cimmerians (Gomer), and settled themselves in -Saccasene, a province of Northern Armenia. From -this province the Scythians gained the name of the -Saqu. The name of Gog seems to be taken from -Gugu, a Scythian prince, who was taken captive by -Assurbanipal from the land of the Saqu.<a name="FNanchor_681_681" id="FNanchor_681_681"></a><a href="#Footnote_681_681" class="fnanchor">[681]</a> Magog is -perhaps Mat-gugu, "land of Gog." These rude, coarse -warriors, like the hordes of Attila, or Zenghis Khan, or -Tamerlane—who were descended from them—magnetised<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_380" id="Page_380">[Pg 380]</a></span> -the imagination of civilised people, as the Huns -did in the fourth century.<a name="FNanchor_682_682" id="FNanchor_682_682"></a><a href="#Footnote_682_682" class="fnanchor">[682]</a> They overthrew the kingdom -of Urartis (Armenia), and drove the all-but -exterminated remnant of the Moschi and Tabali to the -mountain-fortresses by the Black Sea, turning them, as -it were, into a nation of ghosts in Sheol.<a name="FNanchor_683_683" id="FNanchor_683_683"></a><a href="#Footnote_683_683" class="fnanchor">[683]</a> Then they -burst like a thunder-cloud on Mesopotamia, desolating -the villages with their arrow-flights, but too unskilled -to take fenced towns. They swept down the Shephelah -of Palestine, and plundered the rich temple of Aphrodite -(Astarte Ourania) at Askelon, thereby incurring the -curse of the goddess in the form of a strange disease. -But on the borders of Egypt they were diplomatically -met by Psammetichus (<i>d.</i> 611) with gifts and prayers. -Judah seems only to have suffered indirectly from this -invasion. The main army of Scyths poured down the -maritime plain, and there was no sufficient booty to -tempt any but their straggling bands to the barren hills -of Judah.<a name="FNanchor_684_684" id="FNanchor_684_684"></a><a href="#Footnote_684_684" class="fnanchor">[684]</a> It was the report of this over-flooding from -the North which probably evoked the alarming prophecies -of Zephaniah and Jeremiah, though they -found their clearer fulfilment in the invasion of the -Chaldees.</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_381" id="Page_381">[Pg 381]</a></span></p> - -<p>II. This rush of wild nomads averted for a time the -fate of Nineveh.</p> - -<p>The Medes, an Aryan people, had settled south of the -Caspian, <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 790; and in the same century one of these -tribes—the Persians—had settled south-east of Elam -the northern coast of the Persian Gulf. Cyaxares -founded the Median Empire, and attacked Nineveh. -The Scythian invasion forced him to abandon the -siege, and the Scythians burnt the Assyrian palace -and plundered the ruins. But Cyaxares succeeded in -intoxicating and murdering the Scythian leaders at a -banquet, and bribed the army to withdraw. Then -Cyaxares, with the aid of the Babylonians under -Nabopolassar their rebel viceroy, besieged and took -Nineveh—probably about <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 608—while its last king -and his captains were revelling at a banquet.<a name="FNanchor_685_685" id="FNanchor_685_685"></a><a href="#Footnote_685_685" class="fnanchor">[685]</a></p> - -<p>The fall of Nineveh was not astonishing. The -empire had long been "slowly bleeding to death" in -consequence of its incessant wars. The city deemed -itself impregnable behind walls a hundred feet high, on -which three chariots could drive abreast, and mantled -with twelve hundred towers; but she perished, and all -the nations—whom she had known how to crush, but -had with "her stupid and cruel tyranny" never known -how to govern—shouted for joy. That joy finds its -triumphant expression in more than one of the prophets, -but specially in the vivid pan of Nahum. His -date is approximately fixed at about <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 660, by his -reference to the atrocities inflicted by Assurbanipal on -the Egyptian city of No-Amon. "Art thou [Nineveh] -better," he asks, "than No-Amon, that was situate -among the canals, that had the water round about her,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_382" id="Page_382">[Pg 382]</a></span> -whose rampart was the Nile, and her wall was the -waters? Yet she went into captivity! Her young -children were dashed to pieces at the head of all the -streets: they cast lots for her honourable men, and all -her great men were bound in chains. Thou also shalt -be drunken: thou shalt faint away, thou shalt seek a -stronghold because of the enemy."<a name="FNanchor_686_686" id="FNanchor_686_686"></a><a href="#Footnote_686_686" class="fnanchor">[686]</a></p> - -<p>All the details of her fall are dim; but Nineveh was, -in the language of the prophets, swept with the besom -of destruction. Her ruins became stones of emptiness, -and the line of confusion was stretched over her. -Nahum ends with the cry,—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"There is no assuaging of thy hurt; thy wound is grievous:<br /></span> -<span class="i1">All that hear the bruit of this, clap the hands over thee:<br /></span> -<span class="i1">For upon whom hath thy wickedness not passed continually?"<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>In truth, Assyria, the ferocious foe of Israel, of Judah, -and all the world, vanished suddenly, like a dream when -one awaketh;<a name="FNanchor_687_687" id="FNanchor_687_687"></a><a href="#Footnote_687_687" class="fnanchor">[687]</a> and those who passed over its ruins, like -Xenophon and his Ten Thousand in <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 401, knew not -what they were.<a name="FNanchor_688_688" id="FNanchor_688_688"></a><a href="#Footnote_688_688" class="fnanchor">[688]</a> Her very name had become forgotten -in two centuries. "<i>Etiam periere ruin!</i>" The burnt -relics and cracked tablets of her former splendour began -to be revealed to the world once more in 1842, and -it is only during the last quarter of a century that -the fragments of her history have been laboriously -deciphered.</p> - -<p>III. Such were the events witnessed in their germs -or in their completion by the contemporaries of Josiah -and the prophets who adorned his reign. It was during<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_383" id="Page_383">[Pg 383]</a></span> -this period, also, that the power to whom the ultimate -ruin and captivity of Jerusalem was due sprang into -formidable proportions. The ultimate scourge of God -to the guilty people and the guilty city was not to be -the Assyrian, nor the Scythian, nor the Egyptian, nor -any of the old Canaanite or Semitic foes of Israel, nor -the Phœnician, nor the Philistine. With all these she -had long contended, and held her own. It was before -the Chaldee that she was doomed to fall, and the Chaldee -was a new phenomenon of which the existence had -hardly been recognised as a danger till the warning -prophecy of Isaiah to Hezekiah after the embassy of -the rebel viceroy Merodach-Baladan.<a name="FNanchor_689_689" id="FNanchor_689_689"></a><a href="#Footnote_689_689" class="fnanchor">[689]</a></p> - -<p>It is to Habakkuk, in prophecies written very shortly -after the death of Josiah, that we must look for the -impression of terror caused by the Chaldees.</p> - -<p>Nabopolassar,<a name="FNanchor_690_690" id="FNanchor_690_690"></a><a href="#Footnote_690_690" class="fnanchor">[690]</a> sent by the successor of Assurbanipal -to quell a Chaldan revolt, seized the viceroyalty of -Babylon, and joined Cyaxares in the overthrow of -Nineveh. From that time Babylon became greater and -more terrible than Nineveh, whose power it inherited. -Habakkuk (ii. 1-19) paints the rapacity, the selfishness, -the inflated ambition, the cruelty, the drunkenness, the -idolatry of the Chaldans. He calls them (i. 5-11) -a rough and restless nation, frightful and terrible, -whose horsemen were swifter than leopards, fiercer -than evening wolves, flying to gorge on prey like the -vultures, mocking at kings and princes, and flinging -dust over strongholds. Nor has he the least comfort -in looking on their resistless fury, except the deeply<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_384" id="Page_384">[Pg 384]</a></span> -significant oracle—an oracle which contains the secret -of their ultimate doom—</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Behold, his soul is puffed up; it is not upright in him:<br /></span> -<span class="i1">But the righteous man shall live by his fidelity."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>The prophet places absolute reliance on the general -principle that "pride and violence dig their own -grave."<a name="FNanchor_691_691" id="FNanchor_691_691"></a><a href="#Footnote_691_691" class="fnanchor">[691]</a></p> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_385" id="Page_385">[Pg 385]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXI" id="CHAPTER_XXXI">CHAPTER XXXI</a></h2> - -<h3><i>JOSIAH'S REFORMATION</i></h3> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xxii. 8-20, xxiii. 1-25</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"And the works of Josias were upright before his Lord with a -heart full of godliness."—1 <span class="smcap">Esdras</span> i. 23.</p> - -<p>"From Zion shall go forth the Law, and the Word of the Lord -from Jerusalem."—<span class="smcap">Isa.</span> ii. 3.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>It is from the Prophets—Zephaniah, Jeremiah, -Nahum, Habakkuk, Ezekiel—that we catch almost -our sole glimpses of the vast world-movements of the -nations which must have loomed large on the minds of the -King of Judah and of all earnest politicians in that day. -As they did not directly affect the destiny of Judah till -the end of the reign, they do not interest the historian -of the Kings or the later Chronicler. The things which -rendered the reign memorable in their eyes were chiefly -two—the finding of "the Book of the Law" in the House -of the Lord, and the consequent religious reformation.</p> - -<p>It is with the first of these two events that we must -deal in the present chapter.</p> - -<p>Josiah began to reign as a child of eight, and it may -be that the emphatic and honourable mention of his -mother—Jedidah ("Beloved"), daughter of Adaiah of -Boscath—may be due to the fact that he owed to her -training that early proclivity to faithfulness which earns -for him the unique testimony, that he not only "walked<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_386" id="Page_386">[Pg 386]</a></span> -in the way of David his father," but that "he turned -not aside to the right hand or to the left."</p> - -<p>At first, of course, as a mere child, he could take no -very active steps. The Chronicler says that at sixteen -he began to show his devotion, and at twenty set -himself the task of purging Judah and Jerusalem from -the taint of idols. Things were in a bad condition, as -we see from the bitter complaints and denunciations -of Zephaniah and Jeremiah. Idolatry of the worst -description was still openly tolerated. But Josiah was -supported by a band of able and faithful advisers. -Shaphan, grandfather of the unhappy Gedaliah—afterwards -the Chaldan viceroy over conquered Judah—was -scribe; Hilkiah, the son of Shallum and the -ancestor of Ezra, was the high priest.<a name="FNanchor_692_692" id="FNanchor_692_692"></a><a href="#Footnote_692_692" class="fnanchor">[692]</a> By them the -king was assisted, fist in the obliteration of the prevalent -emblems of idolatry, and then in the purification -of the Temple. Two centuries and a half had elapsed -since it had been last repaired by Joash, and it must -have needed serious restoration during long years of -neglect in the reigns of Ahaz, of Manasseh, and of -Amon. Subscriptions were collected from the people -by "the keepers of the door," and were freely entrusted -to the workmen and their overseers, who employed them -faithfully in the objects for which they were designed.<a name="FNanchor_693_693" id="FNanchor_693_693"></a><a href="#Footnote_693_693" class="fnanchor">[693]</a></p> - -<p>The repairs led to an event of momentous influence -on all future time. During the cleansing of the Temple -Hilkiah came to Shaphan, and said, "I have found the -Book of the Law in the House of the Lord." Perhaps<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_387" id="Page_387">[Pg 387]</a></span> -the copy of the book had been placed by some priest's -hand beside the Ark, and had been discovered during -the removal of the rubbish which neglect had there -accumulated. Shaphan read the book; and when next -he had to see the king to tell him about the progress -of the repairs, he said to him, "Hilkiah the priest hath -handed me a book." Josiah bade him read some of it -aloud. It is evident that he read the curses contained -in Deut. xxviii. They horrified the pious monarch; for -all that they contained, and the laws to which they -were appended, were wholly new to him. He might -well be amazed that a code so solemn, and purporting -to have emanated from Moses, should, in spite of -maledictions so fearful, have become an absolute dead -letter. In deep alarm he sent the priest, the scribe -Shaphan, with his son Ahikam, and Abdon, the son of -Micaiah, and Asahiah, a court official, to inquire of -Jehovah, whose great anger could not but be kindled -against king and people by the obliteration and -nullity of His law. They consulted Huldah, the only -prophetess mentioned in the Old Testament, except -Miriam and Deborah.<a name="FNanchor_694_694" id="FNanchor_694_694"></a><a href="#Footnote_694_694" class="fnanchor">[694]</a> She was the wife of Shallum -and keeper of the priests' robes,<a name="FNanchor_695_695" id="FNanchor_695_695"></a><a href="#Footnote_695_695" class="fnanchor">[695]</a> and she lived in the -suburbs of the city.<a name="FNanchor_696_696" id="FNanchor_696_696"></a><a href="#Footnote_696_696" class="fnanchor">[696]</a> Her answer was an uncompromising -menace. All the curses which the king had<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_388" id="Page_388">[Pg 388]</a></span> -heard against the place and people should be pitilessly -fulfilled,—only, as the king had showed a tender heart, -and had humbled himself before Jehovah, he should go -to his own grave in peace.<a name="FNanchor_697_697" id="FNanchor_697_697"></a><a href="#Footnote_697_697" class="fnanchor">[697]</a></p> - -<p>Thereupon the king summoned to the Temple a great -assembly of priests, prophets, and all the people, and, -standing by the pillar (or "on the platform")<a name="FNanchor_698_698" id="FNanchor_698_698"></a><a href="#Footnote_698_698" class="fnanchor">[698]</a> in the -entrance of the inner court, read "all the words of the -Book of the Covenant which had been found in the -House of the Lord" in their ears, and joined with -them in "the covenant" to obey the hitherto unknown -or totally forgotten laws which were inculcated in the -newly discovered volume.</p> - -<p>Immediate action followed. The priests were ordered -to bring out of the Temple all the vessels made for -Baal, for the Asherah, and for the host of heaven; -they were burnt outside Jerusalem in the Valley of -Kedron, and their ashes taken to Bethel.<a name="FNanchor_699_699" id="FNanchor_699_699"></a><a href="#Footnote_699_699" class="fnanchor">[699]</a> The -<i>chemarim</i> of the high places were suppressed, as well -as all other idolatrous priests who burnt incense to -the signs of the Zodiac, the Hyades, and the heavenly -bodies.<a name="FNanchor_700_700" id="FNanchor_700_700"></a><a href="#Footnote_700_700" class="fnanchor">[700]</a> The Asherah itself was taken out of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_389" id="Page_389">[Pg 389]</a></span> -Temple, and it is truly amazing that we should find -it there so late in Josiah's reign. He burnt it in the -Kedron, stamped it to powder, and scattered the powder -"on the graves of the common people." The Chronicler -says "on the graves of them that had sacrificed" to -the idols<a name="FNanchor_701_701" id="FNanchor_701_701"></a><a href="#Footnote_701_701" class="fnanchor">[701]</a>;—but this is an inexplicable statement, since -it is (as Professor Lumby says) very improbable that -idolaters had a separate burial-place. It is equally -shocking, and to us incomprehensible, to read that the -houses of the degraded <i>Qedeshim</i> still stood, not "by -the Temple" (A.V.), but "<i>in</i> the Temple,"<a name="FNanchor_702_702" id="FNanchor_702_702"></a><a href="#Footnote_702_702" class="fnanchor">[702]</a> and that -in these houses, or chambers, the women still "wove -embroideries<a name="FNanchor_703_703" id="FNanchor_703_703"></a><a href="#Footnote_703_703" class="fnanchor">[703]</a> for the Asherah." What was Hilkiah -doing? If the priests of the <i>high places</i> were so -guilty from Geba to Beersheba, did no responsibility -attach to the high priest and other priests of the -Temple who permitted the existence of these enormities, -not only in the <i>bamoth</i> at the city gates,<a name="FNanchor_704_704" id="FNanchor_704_704"></a><a href="#Footnote_704_704" class="fnanchor">[704]</a> but in the -very courts of the mountain of the Lord's House? If -the priests of the immemorial shrines were degraded -from their prerogatives, and were not allowed to come -up to the altar of Jehovah in Jerusalem, by what law -of justice were they to be regarded as so immeasurably -inferior to the highest members of their own order, -who, for years together, had permitted the worship of -a wooden phallic emblem, and the existence of the -worst heathen abominations within the very Temple<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_390" id="Page_390">[Pg 390]</a></span> -of the Lord? Every honest reader must admit that -there are inexplicable difficulties and uncertainties in -these ancient histories, and that our knowledge of the -exact circumstances—especially in all that regards the -priests and Levites, who, in the Chronicles, are their -own ecclesiastical historians—must remain extremely -imperfect.</p> - -<p>And what can be meant by the clause that the -degraded priests of the old high places, though they -were not allowed to serve at the great altar, yet "did -eat of the <i>unleavened bread</i> among their brethren"? -Unleavened bread was only eaten at the Passover; and -when there <i>was</i> a Passover, was eaten by all alike. -Perhaps the reading for "unleavened bread" should -be (priestly) "portions"—a reading found by Geiger -in an old manuscript.</p> - -<p>Continuing his work, Josiah defiled Tophet;<a name="FNanchor_705_705" id="FNanchor_705_705"></a><a href="#Footnote_705_705" class="fnanchor">[705]</a> took -away the horses given by the kings of Judah to the -sun, which were stabled beside the chamber of the -eunuch Nathan-Melech in the precincts;<a name="FNanchor_706_706" id="FNanchor_706_706"></a><a href="#Footnote_706_706" class="fnanchor">[706]</a> and burnt the -sun-chariots in the fire. He removed the altars to the -stars on the roof of the upper chamber of Ahaz,<a name="FNanchor_707_707" id="FNanchor_707_707"></a><a href="#Footnote_707_707" class="fnanchor">[707]</a> and -ground them to powder. He also destroyed those of -his grandfather Manasseh in the two Temple courts—which -we supposed to have been removed by Manasseh -in his repentance—and threw the dust into the Kedron. -He defiled the idolatrous shrines reared by Solomon -to the deities of Sidon, Ammon, and Moloch, broke the -pillars, cut down the Asherim, and filled their places<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_391" id="Page_391">[Pg 391]</a></span> -with dead men's bones.<a name="FNanchor_708_708" id="FNanchor_708_708"></a><a href="#Footnote_708_708" class="fnanchor">[708]</a> Travelling northwards, he -burnt, destroyed, and stamped to powder the altars and -the Asherim at Bethel, and burnt upon the altars -the remains found in the sepulchres,<a name="FNanchor_709_709" id="FNanchor_709_709"></a><a href="#Footnote_709_709" class="fnanchor">[709]</a> only leaving -undisturbed the remains of the old prophet from -Judah, and of the prophet of Samaria.<a name="FNanchor_710_710" id="FNanchor_710_710"></a><a href="#Footnote_710_710" class="fnanchor">[710]</a> He then -destroyed the other Samaritan shrines, exercising an -undisputed authority over the Northern Kingdom. The -mixed inhabitants did not interfere with his proceedings; -and in the declining fortunes of Nineveh, the Assyrian -viceroy—if there was one—did not dispute his authority. -Lastly, in accordance with the fierce injunction of -Deut. xvii. 2-5, "he slew all the priests of the high -places" on their own altars, burnt men's bones upon -them, and returned to Jerusalem.</p> - -<p>It is very difficult, with the milder notions which -we have learnt from the spirit of the Gospel, to look -with approval on the recrudescence of the Elijah-spirit -displayed by the last proceeding. But many centuries -were to elapse, even under the Gospel Dispensation, -before men learnt the sacred principle of the early -Christians that "violence is hateful to God." Josiah -must be judged by a more lenient judgment, and he -was obeying a mandate found in the new Book of -the Law. But the question arises whether the fierce<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_392" id="Page_392">[Pg 392]</a></span> -commands of Deuteronomy were ever intended to be -taken <i>au pied de la lettre</i>. May not Deut. xiii. 6-18 -have been intended to express in a concrete but ideal -form the spirit of execration to be entertained towards -idolatry? Perhaps in thinking so we are only guilty -of an anachronism, and are applying to the seventh -century before Christ the feelings of the nineteenth century -after Christ.</p> - -<p>After this Josiah ordered the people to keep a Deuteronomic -Passover, such as we are told—and as all the -circumstances prove—had not been kept from the days -of the Judges. The Chronicler revels in the details of -this Passover, and tells us that Josiah gave the people -thirty thousand lambs and kids, and three thousand -bullocks; and his priests gave two thousand six hundred -small cattle, and three hundred oxen; and the chief of -the Levites gave the Levites five thousand small cattle, -and five hundred oxen. He goes on to describe the -slaying, sprinkling of blood, flaying, roasting, boiling in -pots, pans, and caldrons, and attention paid to the burnt-offerings -and the fat;<a name="FNanchor_711_711" id="FNanchor_711_711"></a><a href="#Footnote_711_711" class="fnanchor">[711]</a> but neither the historians nor -the chroniclers, either here or anywhere else, say one -word about the Day of Atonement, or seem aware of its -existence. It belongs to the Post-Exilic Priestly Code, -and is not alluded to in the Book of Deuteronomy.</p> - -<p>Continuing his task, he put away them that had familiar -spirits (<i>oboth</i>), and the wizards, and the <i>teraphim</i>, -with a zeal shown by no king before or after him; but -Jehovah "turned not from the fierceness of His anger, -because of all the provocations which Manasseh had -provoked Him withal." Evil, alas! is more diffusive, -and in some senses more permanent, than good, because -of the perverted bias of human nature. Judah and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_393" id="Page_393">[Pg 393]</a></span> -Jerusalem had been radically corrupted by the apostate -son of Hezekiah, and it may be that the sudden and -high-handed reformation enforced by his grandson depended -too exclusively on the external impulse given -to it by the king to produce deep effects in the hearts -of the people. Certain it is that even Jeremiah—though -he was closely connected with the finders of the book, -had perhaps been present when the solemn league -and covenant was taken in the Temple, and lived -through the reformation in which he probably took a -considerable part—was profoundly dissatisfied with the -results. It is sad and singular that such should have -been the case; for in the first flush of the new enthusiasm -he had written, "Cursed be the man that heareth -not the words of this covenant, which I commanded -your fathers in the day that I brought them forth out -of the land of Egypt, saying, 'Obey My voice.'"<a name="FNanchor_712_712" id="FNanchor_712_712"></a><a href="#Footnote_712_712" class="fnanchor">[712]</a> Nay, -it has been inferred that he was even an itinerant -preacher of the newly found law; for he writes: "And -the Lord said unto me, 'Proclaim all these words in the -cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem, saying, -Hear ye the words of this covenant, and do them.'"<a name="FNanchor_713_713" id="FNanchor_713_713"></a><a href="#Footnote_713_713" class="fnanchor">[713]</a></p> - -<p>The style of Deuteronomy, as is well known, shows -remarkable affinities with the style of Jeremiah. Yet -it is clear that after the death of Josiah the prophet<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_394" id="Page_394">[Pg 394]</a></span> -became utterly disillusioned with the outcome of the -whole movement. It proved itself to be at once evanescent -and unreal. The people would not give up -their beloved local shrines.<a name="FNanchor_714_714" id="FNanchor_714_714"></a><a href="#Footnote_714_714" class="fnanchor">[714]</a> The law, as Habakkuk -says (i. 4), became torpid; judgment went not forth to -victory; the wicked compassed about the righteous, -and judgment was perverted. It was easy to obey the -external regulations of Deuteronomy; it was far more -difficult to be true to its noble moral precepts. The -reformation of Josiah, so violent and radical, proved -to be only skin-deep; and Jeremiah, with bitter disappointment, -found it to be so. External decency -might be improved, but rites and forms are nothing -to Him who searcheth the heart.<a name="FNanchor_715_715" id="FNanchor_715_715"></a><a href="#Footnote_715_715" class="fnanchor">[715]</a> There was, in fact, -an inherent danger in the place assumed by the newly -discovered book. "Since it was regarded as a State -authority, there early arose a kind of book-science, with -its pedantic pride and erroneous learned endeavours to -interpret and apply the Scriptures. At the same time -there arose also a new kind of hypocrisy and idolatry -of the letter, through the new protection which the -State gave to the religion of the book acknowledged by -the law. Thus scholastic wisdom came into conflict -with genuine prophecy."<a name="FNanchor_716_716" id="FNanchor_716_716"></a><a href="#Footnote_716_716" class="fnanchor">[716]</a></p> - -<p>How entirely the improvement of outward worship -failed to improve men's hearts the prophet testifies.<a name="FNanchor_717_717" id="FNanchor_717_717"></a><a href="#Footnote_717_717" class="fnanchor">[717]</a> -"The sin of Judah," he says, "is written with a pen of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_395" id="Page_395">[Pg 395]</a></span> -iron, and with the point of a diamond: it is graven -upon the tablets of their hearts, and upon the horns of -their altars, and their Asherim by the green trees<a name="FNanchor_718_718" id="FNanchor_718_718"></a><a href="#Footnote_718_718" class="fnanchor">[718]</a> upon -the high hills. O My mountain in the field, I will -cause thee to serve thine enemies in the land thou -knowest not: for ye have kindled a fire in Mine -eyes, which shall burn for ever." While Josiah lived -this apostasy was secret; but as soon as he died the -people "turned again to folly,"<a name="FNanchor_719_719" id="FNanchor_719_719"></a><a href="#Footnote_719_719" class="fnanchor">[719]</a> and committed all the -old idolatries except the worship of Moloch. There -arose a danger lest even the moderate ritualism of -Deuteronomy should be perverted and exaggerated -into mere formality. In the energy of his indignation -against this abuse, Jeremiah has to uplift his voice -against any trust even in the most decided injunctions -of this newly discovered law. He was "a second Amos -upon a higher platform." The Deuteronomic Law did -not as yet exhibit the concentrated sacerdotalism and -ritualism which mark the Priestly Code, to which it is -far superior in every way. It is still prophetic in its -tone. It places social interests above rubrics of worship. -It expresses the fundamental religious thought "that -Jehovah is in no sense inaccessible; that He can be -approached immediately by all, and without sacerdotal -intervention; that He asks nothing for Himself, but -asks it as a religious duty that man should render<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_396" id="Page_396">[Pg 396]</a></span> -unto man what is right; that His Will lies not in any -known height, but in the moral sphere which is known -and understood by all."<a name="FNanchor_720_720" id="FNanchor_720_720"></a><a href="#Footnote_720_720" class="fnanchor">[720]</a> The book ordained certain -sacrifices; yet Jeremiah says with startling emphasis, -"To what purpose cometh there to Me frankincense -from Sheba, and the sweet calamus from a far country? -Your burnt-offerings are not acceptable, nor your -sacrifices pleasant unto Me."<a name="FNanchor_721_721" id="FNanchor_721_721"></a><a href="#Footnote_721_721" class="fnanchor">[721]</a> Therefore He bids -them, "Put your burnt-offerings to your sacrifices, and -eat them as flesh"—<i>i.e.</i>, "Throw all your offerings into -a mass, and eat them at your pleasure (regardless of -sacerdotal rules): they have neither any inherent sanctity -nor any secondary importance from the characters -of the offerers."<a name="FNanchor_722_722" id="FNanchor_722_722"></a><a href="#Footnote_722_722" class="fnanchor">[722]</a> And in a still more remarkable -passage, "<i>For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded -them in the day that I brought them out of the land -of Egypt, concerning burnt-offerings and sacrifices</i>: but -this thing I commanded them, saying, 'Obey My voice.'"<a name="FNanchor_723_723" id="FNanchor_723_723"></a><a href="#Footnote_723_723" class="fnanchor">[723]</a></p> - -<p>Nay, in the most emphatic ordinances of Deuteronomy -he found that the people had created a new peril. -They were putting a particularistic trust in Jehovah, -as though He were a respecter of persons, and they -His favourites. They fancied, as in the days of Micah, -that it was enough for them to claim His name, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_397" id="Page_397">[Pg 397]</a></span> -bribe Him with sacrifices.<a name="FNanchor_724_724" id="FNanchor_724_724"></a><a href="#Footnote_724_724" class="fnanchor">[724]</a> Above all, they boasted of -and relied upon the possession of His Temple, and -placed their trust on the punctual observance of -external ceremonies. All these sources of vain confidence -it was the duty of Jeremiah rudely to shatter -to pieces. Standing at the gates of the Lord's House, -he cried: "Trust ye not in lying words, saying, 'The -Temple of the Lord! the Temple of the Lord! the -Temple of the Lord, are these!' Behold, ye trust in -lying words, that cannot profit. Will ye steal, murder, -commit adultery, swear falsely, burn incense unto Baal, -and walk after other gods; and come and stand before -Me in this house, whereupon My name is called, and -say, 'We are delivered,' that ye may do all these -abominations? Is this house become a den of robbers -in your eyes? But go ye now to My place which was -in Shiloh, where I caused My name to dwell at the -first, and see what I did to it for the wickedness of -My people. I will do unto this house as I have done -to Shiloh; and I will cast you out of My sight, as I have -cast out the whole house of Ephraim."<a name="FNanchor_725_725" id="FNanchor_725_725"></a><a href="#Footnote_725_725" class="fnanchor">[725]</a>—Yet all hope -was not extinguished for ever. The Scythian might -disappear; the Babylonian might come in his place; -but one day there should be a new covenant of pardon -and restitution; and as had been promised in Deuteronomy, -"<i>all</i> should know Jehovah, from the least to -the greatest."</p> - -<p>At last he even prophesies the entire future annulment -of the solemn covenant made on the basis of -Deuteronomy, and says that Jehovah will make a new -covenant with His people, not according to the covenant -which He made with their fathers.<a name="FNanchor_726_726" id="FNanchor_726_726"></a><a href="#Footnote_726_726" class="fnanchor">[726]</a> And in his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_398" id="Page_398">[Pg 398]</a></span> -final estimate of King Josiah after his death, he does -not so much as mention his reformation, his iconoclasm, -his sweeping zeal, or his enforcement of the Deuteronomic -Law, but only says to Jehoiakim:—</p> - -<p>"'Did not thy father eat and drink, and do judgment -and justice?—then it was well with him. He judged -the cause of the poor and needy; then it was well. -<i>Was not this to know Me?' saith the Lord</i>."<a name="FNanchor_727_727" id="FNanchor_727_727"></a><a href="#Footnote_727_727" class="fnanchor">[727]</a></p> - -<p>Whether because its methods were too violent, or -because it only affected the surface of men's lives, -or because the people were not really ripe for it, or -because no reformation can ever succeed which is -enforced by autocracy, not spread by persuasion and -conviction, it is certain that the first glamour of Josiah's -movement ended in disillusionment. A religion violently -imposed from without as a state-religion naturally tends -to hypocrisy and externalism. What Jehovah required -was, not a changed method of worship, but a changed -heart; and this the reformation of Josiah did not -produce. It has often been so in human history. -Failure seems to be written on many of the most laudable -human efforts. Nevertheless, truth ultimately -prevails. Isaiah was murdered, and Urijah, and -Jeremiah. Savonarola was burnt, and Huss, and many -a martyr more; but the might of priestcraft was at last -crippled, to be revived, we hope, no more, either by -open violence or secret apostasy.</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Then to side with Truth is noble, when we share her wretched crust,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Ere her cause bring fame and profit, and 'tis prosperous to be just;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Then it is the brave man chooses, while the coward stands aside,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Doubting in his abject spirit till his Lord is crucified,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">And the multitude make virtue of the faith they have denied."<br /></span> -</div></div> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_399" id="Page_399">[Pg 399]</a></span></p> - - - -<h3>NOTE TO CHAPTER XXXI.</h3> - -<h4>"Jehovah is our Lawgiver."—<span class="smcap">Isa.</span> xxxiii. 22.</h4> - - -<p>What was the Book of the Law which Hilkiah found in the -Temple?</p> - -<p>The great majority of eminent modern critics have now come -to the conclusion that it was the kernel of the Book of Deuteronomy. -Nor is this in any sense a mere modern notion. It -occurs as far back as St. Jerome (<i>Adv. Jovin.</i>, i. 5) and St. Chrysostom -(<i>Hom. in Matt.</i>, ix., p. 135, B. See W. Rob. Smith, p. 258).</p> - -<p>It is no part of my immediate duty to argue this question, but -I may state that the arguments for this conclusion are partly -historical, partly literary, and partly depend on internal evidence.</p> - -<p>I. As regards the <i>literary</i> argument, it is maintained that—</p> - -<p>1. The full, rounded, rhetorical style of Deuteronomy, so -widely different from the extreme dryness of other parts of the -Torah, could not have been as yet developed in the days of -Moses, and required the slow training of centuries for its -perfection. It is a new phenomenon, and differs widely from -earlier prophetic writings, such as those of Amos and Hosea.</p> - -<p>2. The style and language of the Deuteronomist are so marked, -that they can scarcely escape an intelligent reader of the -English Version. Riehm enumerates sixty-four characteristic -words or phrases. Their significance lies in the fact that they -express obvious ideas, and are not names for special objects, which -force a writer to use peculiar words. The style closely resembles -in many phrases and particulars the style of Jeremiah, and of -him alone among the prophets. "Even supposing that no -historic text," it has been said, "taught us that the articles of -Smalkald were the work of Luther, we should still have the right -to affirm that these articles closely resemble the ideas of Luther, -and could hardly have been published without his cognisance."</p> - -<p>II. As regards <i>historical</i> evidence, we observe that—</p> - -<p>1. No author earlier than Josiah shows any acquaintance with -Deuteronomy: after that date, proofs of such knowledge abound.</p> - -<p>2. The Book of Deuteronomy insisted with reiterated emphasis -on the centralisation of worship. All its ordinances are framed -with a view to promote this end. But we have seen that there<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_400" id="Page_400">[Pg 400]</a></span> -is not a trace of any belief that local shrines were prohibited -earlier than the reign of Hezekiah, who certainly would have -defended his boldness by appeal to a written law if he had -known of such as existing.</p> - -<p>III. As regards <i>internal</i> evidence, we see that—</p> - -<p>1. Many passages and injunctions of the Book of Deuteronomy -differ entirely from those found in the old Book of the Covenant -which forms the most ancient nucleus of Exodus (Exod. xx. 22-xxiii. -33).</p> - -<p>2. Even the most conservative English critics—even those -who, with any pretence to competent knowledge, argue against -the more advanced conclusions of the Higher Criticism—cannot -help admitting that at least three codes, which in many, -and in some fundamental, respects differ widely from each -other, and which make no reference to each other, are found -in our present Pentateuch—viz., that of the Book of the -Covenant, that of the Deuteronomist (D.), and that of the -Priestly writer (P.). All three may contain elements as old as the -days of Moses; but most critics (with scarcely an exception in -Germany) now believe that the Deuteronomic Code, in its -present form, is not earlier than the date of Josiah's reformation -(<i>circ.</i> <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 621); and the Priestly Codex (whatever older documents -may exist in it) not older, in its present form, than about the -time of Ezra (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 444). Dillmann, Kittel, and in his later days -Delitzsch, have been of necessity compelled to give up the views -that, in their present form, D. and P. are as ancient as the days -of Moses. The last German critic who held that Moses wrote -our present Pentateuch was Keil (<i>d.</i> 1888). Canon Cheyne argues -for the late date of this misnamed "Deuteronomy," on the grounds -that the authors (1) used documents manifestly later than Moses; -(2) alluded to events which only occurred long after Moses; and -(3) expressed ideas which, in the age of Moses, are not psychologically -possible.</p> - -<p>The Book of Deuteronomy consists mainly of an historical introduction, -probably added later (i. 1-5); Moses' <i>first</i> discourse (i. 6-iv. -40); Moses' <i>second</i> discourse (iv. 44-xxvi.); a section marked -specially by blessings and curses (xxvii.-xxix.); a <i>third</i> discourse -of Moses (xxix. 2-xxx. 20); his farewell (xxxi. 1-13); his song -(xxxi. 14-xxxii. 47); conclusion, narrating his blessing and death -(xxxii. 48-xxxiv. 12).</p> - -<p>I have no space here to enter fully into the arguments which<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_401" id="Page_401">[Pg 401]</a></span> -seem decisive as to the date of the main part of Deuteronomy. -Those who desire to see them must study Colenso, <i>The Pentateuch</i>, -pt. iii.; Reuss, <i>Hist. Sainte et la Loi</i>, i. 154-211; W. Robertson -Smith, <i>Old Test. in the Jewish Church</i>, lect. xvi.; Kuenen, <i>The -Hexateuch</i>, E. T., 1886; Kittel, <i>Gesch. d. Hebrer</i>, pp. 43-59; -Cheyne, <i>Jeremiah</i>, pp. 48-86; S. R. Driver, <i>s.v.</i> "Deuteronomy" -(Smith's <i>Dict. of the Bible</i>, new ed.); W. Aldis Wright, <i>The -Documents of the Hexateuch</i>, pp. lvii.-lxxix. The name "Deuteronomy" -(or "second law") arises from the mistaken rendering of -the LXX. and Vulgate in Deut. xvii. 18.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_402" id="Page_402">[Pg 402]</a></span></p> - - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXII" id="CHAPTER_XXXII">CHAPTER XXXII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE DEATH OF JOSIAH</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 608</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xxiii. 29, 30</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"Howl, O fir tree; for the cedar is fallen."—<span class="smcap">Zech.</span> xi. 2.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>Josiah survived by thirteen years the reformation -and covenant which are the chief events of his -reign. He lived in prosperity and peace. He did -justice and judgment; the poor and needy flourished -under his royal protection; and it was well with him. -It seemed as if the Deuteronomic blessings on faithfulness -to its law were about to be abundantly fulfilled, -when "the azure calm of heaven" was suddenly -shattered, and "down came the thunderbolt." The -great and victorious Assurbanipal of Assyria had died, -and left his power to weaker successors. Meanwhile, -Egypt was growing in power and splendour under -Pharaoh Necho II. (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 612-596), the sixth king of the -twenty-fifth or Saitic dynasty. He nearly anticipated -M. de Lesseps in making the Suez Canal,<a name="FNanchor_728_728" id="FNanchor_728_728"></a><a href="#Footnote_728_728" class="fnanchor">[728]</a> and perhaps -actually anticipated Vasco de Gama in rounding the -Cabo Tormentoso, or Cape of Good Hope, in a three -years' voyage. He was fired by the ambitious dream<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_403" id="Page_403">[Pg 403]</a></span> -of succeeding the Assyrians as the chief power in the -world, or at any rate of seizing part of the dominions -which they had conquered.<a name="FNanchor_729_729" id="FNanchor_729_729"></a><a href="#Footnote_729_729" class="fnanchor">[729]</a> Accordingly, in <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 608, -he went up against the King of Assyria to the river -Euphrates. The Chronicler says that his destination -was Carchemish, on the Euphrates, and some have conjectured -that the vague phrase "against the King of -Assyria" is incorrect, and that, as Josephus states, he -was really marching against the Medes and Babylonians -after the fall of Nineveh.<a name="FNanchor_730_730" id="FNanchor_730_730"></a><a href="#Footnote_730_730" class="fnanchor">[730]</a></p> - -<p>With this expedition Josiah was not greatly concerned. -He may have begun his reign as the vassal -of Assurbanipal; but if so, it is probable that he had -long since ceased to pay tribute to a power which was -tottering to its fall under the attacks of Scythians -and Babylonians. He had availed himself of the disorganisation -of the Assyrian power to re-establish -some, at least, of the old authority of the House of -David over the Northern Kingdom, and perhaps he -only undertook the desperate expedient of withstanding -the northward march of the Egyptian host under the -notion that either on the march or on his return the -Pharaoh intended to subjugate Palestine to Egypt.</p> - -<p>Pharaoh Necho II., among his other achievements, -had created a powerful fleet,<a name="FNanchor_731_731" id="FNanchor_731_731"></a><a href="#Footnote_731_731" class="fnanchor">[731]</a> and it is nearly certain -that he did not advance along the coast of Palestine, -but made his way by sea to Acco or Dor.<a name="FNanchor_732_732" id="FNanchor_732_732"></a><a href="#Footnote_732_732" class="fnanchor">[732]</a> Here he -received the news that Josiah meant to block his path<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_404" id="Page_404">[Pg 404]</a></span> -at Megiddo, on the plain of Jezreel. That plain has -been the great and only possible battle-field of Palestine, -from the revolt in which Barak destroyed the host of -Jabin,<a name="FNanchor_733_733" id="FNanchor_733_733"></a><a href="#Footnote_733_733" class="fnanchor">[733]</a> to that in which Tryphon met Jonathan the -Maccabee,<a name="FNanchor_734_734" id="FNanchor_734_734"></a><a href="#Footnote_734_734" class="fnanchor">[734]</a> and Kleber in 1799 defeated twenty-five -thousand Turks with three thousand French.</p> - -<p>The Chronicler here adds a very remarkable incident.<a name="FNanchor_735_735" id="FNanchor_735_735"></a><a href="#Footnote_735_735" class="fnanchor">[735]</a> -Necho, like Joash of Israel in former days, did -not care to fight with the poor little King of Judah—or -at any rate did not wish to do so at present, when he -was on his way to the greater encounter. He therefore -sent an embassy to Josiah, saying, "What have I to -do with thee, King of Judah? I come not against -thee this day, but against the house wherewith I have -war.<a name="FNanchor_736_736" id="FNanchor_736_736"></a><a href="#Footnote_736_736" class="fnanchor">[736]</a> For God [Elohim] commanded me [in a dream] -to make haste.<a name="FNanchor_737_737" id="FNanchor_737_737"></a><a href="#Footnote_737_737" class="fnanchor">[737]</a> Forbear, then, from meddling with God, -who is with me, that He destroy thee not."</p> - -<p>The conjecture "in a dream" is not unlikely, nor is -it in disaccord with other events in the annals of the -Pharaohs and the Sargonid of Assyria.<a name="FNanchor_738_738" id="FNanchor_738_738"></a><a href="#Footnote_738_738" class="fnanchor">[738]</a> We may -indeed be surprised that an Egyptian Pharaoh should -profess to deliver to a Jewish king the messages of -Elohim, though we have seen something like this in the -case of the Rabshakeh.<a name="FNanchor_739_739" id="FNanchor_739_739"></a><a href="#Footnote_739_739" class="fnanchor">[739]</a> The variation in 1 Esdras i. -26-28 is curious and interesting. We are there told<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_405" id="Page_405">[Pg 405]</a></span> -that the message was sent to Josiah, not only by Pharaoh -Necho, who had sent to say "The Lord is with me -hastening me forward: depart from me, and be not -against the Lord," but also by "the prophet Jeremy." -Josephus frankly ascribes the error of Josiah to destiny, -as though he had been infatuated by the dementation -which the Greeks attributed to At.<a name="FNanchor_740_740" id="FNanchor_740_740"></a><a href="#Footnote_740_740" class="fnanchor">[740]</a></p> - -<p>This, however, is not likely; for it is clear that -Jeremiah, though not mentioned in the Book of Kings, -must have had a strong influence over the mind of -Josiah, whom he loved, whose views he shared, in -whose religious revolution he had taken part. Further, -we do not read of any warning recorded by the prophet -himself; and had he uttered one, it would certainly have -been mentioned, when he committed his prophecies to -writing twenty-three years after their commencement. -A warning of which the neglect had led to fatal issues -would have been so decisive a confirmation of Jeremiah's -prophetic insight that it could not have been passed -over in silence.</p> - -<p>Indeed, Jeremiah may have shared the conviction -which, founded on imperfect generalisation, perhaps -dazzled the unfortunate king to his ruin. Josiah had -accepted the Book of Deuteronomy with the whole -strength of his belief, and the Book of Deuteronomy -had proclaimed to Israel as the reward of faithfulness -this promise: "And it shall come to pass that Jehovah, -thy God, shall set thee on high above all the nations -of the earth.... Jehovah shall cause thine enemies -which rise up against thee to be smitten before thy -face: they shall come out against thee one way, and -flee before thee seven ways."<a name="FNanchor_741_741" id="FNanchor_741_741"></a><a href="#Footnote_741_741" class="fnanchor">[741]</a> In the strength of that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_406" id="Page_406">[Pg 406]</a></span> -promise, Josiah was perhaps saying to himself, in the -language of the Psalms, that Jehovah could not fail to -save His anointed, and dash His enemies to pieces -under His feet;<a name="FNanchor_742_742" id="FNanchor_742_742"></a><a href="#Footnote_742_742" class="fnanchor">[742]</a> in the language, perhaps, of later days, -that the sound of a shaken leaf should chase them, and -they should flee when none pursued.<a name="FNanchor_743_743" id="FNanchor_743_743"></a><a href="#Footnote_743_743" class="fnanchor">[743]</a></p> - -<p>Alas! such passages do not apply invariably to our -worldly fortunes! God's promises are general. The -individual must be considered apart from the universal -in the region of spiritual and eternal blessings. In the -affairs of earth the wicked often seem to be in prosperity, -while the righteous are overwhelmed by all God's waves -and storms. Further, Josiah evidently received a -warning—a warning which professed to come, and -really came, from God<a name="FNanchor_744_744" id="FNanchor_744_744"></a><a href="#Footnote_744_744" class="fnanchor">[744]</a>—whether uttered by Pharaoh -or by Jeremiah. And in this instance Josiah had -sought war; he had not been forced into it. It was -not for him to go out of his way to champion the cause -either of cruel Assyria or vaunting Babylon.</p> - -<p>The result was entire disenchantment. No more disheartening -and disastrous calamity could have happened -to the kingdom, which had just begun to struggle out -of the slough of idolatry and humiliation.</p> - -<p>Heedless of the message he had received, strong in -mistaken hopes, Josiah opposed his poor, weak forces -to the powerful host of renovated Egypt. The result -was instantaneous ruin.<a name="FNanchor_745_745" id="FNanchor_745_745"></a><a href="#Footnote_745_745" class="fnanchor">[745]</a> Judah was defeated and -scattered without a blow,—Necho came, saw, conquered. -Josiah, according to the present record of the Chronicles,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_407" id="Page_407">[Pg 407]</a></span> -like Ahab, "disguised himself"<a name="FNanchor_746_746" id="FNanchor_746_746"></a><a href="#Footnote_746_746" class="fnanchor">[746]</a> and went into the -battle; and as he drove from rank to rank an Egyptian -archer drew a bow at a venture, and smote him while -he was putting his forces in array. The arrow-point -brought conviction too late. Josiah saw his error; he -knew that his own death involved the rout of his army. -He sounded a retreat, and said to his servants, "Bear -me away to my travelling chariot, for I am sore -wounded."<a name="FNanchor_747_747" id="FNanchor_747_747"></a><a href="#Footnote_747_747" class="fnanchor">[747]</a> He died at Megiddo, where his ancestor -Ahaziah had died before him from the arrow-wounds -of Jehu's pursuers. His servants carried him in a -chariot dead from Megiddo. The famous plain of -Esdraelon had already witnessed two great victories—that -of Barak over Sisera, and that of Gideon over the -Midianites; and one deplorable defeat—that of Saul by -the Philistines. It was now darkened by a catastrophe -even more sad.<a name="FNanchor_748_748" id="FNanchor_748_748"></a><a href="#Footnote_748_748" class="fnanchor">[748]</a></p> - -<p>When that chariot, accompanied by its wailing escort, -entered the gates of Jerusalem, with the routed army -of Judah behind it, the feeling of the people must have -resembled that of the Athenians when the news reached -them that Lysander had destroyed their whole fleet -at gospotami, and the long wail went thrilling up -through that sleepless night from the Peirus all along -the Makra Teich to the Parthenon and the Acropolis. -And there followed such a mourning as the land had -never known before. It had begun at Megiddo and -Hadadrimmon, leaving the sad memory of its hopeless<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_408" id="Page_408">[Pg 408]</a></span> -intensity. It was renewed at Jerusalem when they buried -the king in his own sepulchre. "The land mourned, -every family apart; the family of the House of David -apart, and their wives apart; the family of the House of -Nathan apart, and their wives apart; the family of the -House of Levi apart, and their wives apart; the family -of Shimei apart, and their wives apart; all the families -that remained, every family apart, and their wives -apart."<a name="FNanchor_749_749" id="FNanchor_749_749"></a><a href="#Footnote_749_749" class="fnanchor">[749]</a> "And all Judah and Jerusalem mourned for -Josiah. And Jeremiah lamented for Josiah: and all -the singing men and the singing women spake of Josiah -in their lamentations unto this day, and they were made -an institution in Israel: and, behold, they are written -in the Lamentations."<a name="FNanchor_750_750" id="FNanchor_750_750"></a><a href="#Footnote_750_750" class="fnanchor">[750]</a> Not even for heroic David, -or royal Solomon, or pious Asa, or prosperous Jehoshaphat -had there been so loud a dirge.</p> - -<p>But, alas! there was cause for far deeper sorrow than -the loss of a prince, however able, however beloved. The -dead was dead. Natural sorrow for the bereavement of -the people would soon be healed by time, but behind the -passing affliction lay a great fear and a great reaction.</p> - -<p>A great fear,—for now a southern foe was added to -the northern. Jeremiah and other prophets had warned -Israel of the peril from the North. When the Scythian -wave "rolled shoreward, struck and was dissipated,"<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_409" id="Page_409">[Pg 409]</a></span> -when the source of Assyrian terror seemed to be drying -up, worldlings may have felt inclined to laugh at -Jeremiah. But now it was evident that, sooner or -later, the Chaldans would be as formidable as their -predecessors, and out of the serpent's egg was breaking -forth a cockatrice. The uncalled-for attempt of Josiah -to bar the path of the new and mighty Pharaoh had -also added Egypt to the list of formidable enemies. -For the present the Pharaoh had passed on to the -Euphrates; but whether he returned victorious or -defeated, his troops could not but be a source of danger -to the little kingdom, which would henceforth be helpless -between the overwhelming forces of its foes.</p> - -<p>If such were the fears of the timid and the pessimistic, -still deeper was the disheartenment of the faithful. -Josiah had been the most obedient, the most religious, -of all the kings of Judah from childhood upwards. -Where, then, were Jehovah's old loving-kindnesses -which He sware unto David in His truth? Had God -forgotten to be gracious? Had He hidden away His -mercy in displeasure? Where were the blessings of -the newly discovered Book of the Law, if the curse -fell on its most earnest votary? Where was Huldah's -promise that he should be gathered to his fathers -in peace, if he was carried back dead from the field -of fruitless battle? There can be little doubt that -the apparent blight which had fallen on unavailing -righteousness hastened the reaction of the subsequent -reigns. Many might be inclined to cry out with even -Jeremiah in his moments of overwhelming despondency, -"Ah, Lord God! surely Thou hast greatly deceived this -people and Jerusalem, saying, 'Ye shall have peace'; -whereas the sword reacheth unto the soul."<a name="FNanchor_751_751" id="FNanchor_751_751"></a><a href="#Footnote_751_751" class="fnanchor">[751]</a> "O Lord,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_410" id="Page_410">[Pg 410]</a></span> -Thou has deceived me, and I was deceived: Thou art -stronger than I, and hast prevailed: I am a derision -daily, every one mocketh me. Whenever I speak, I -must shout, I must cry violence and spoil; for the word -of the Lord is made a reproach unto me, and a derision, -daily."<a name="FNanchor_752_752" id="FNanchor_752_752"></a><a href="#Footnote_752_752" class="fnanchor">[752]</a></p> - -<p>But man judges partially and judges amiss. God's -ways are not as man's ways. God sees the whole; -He sees the future; He sees things as they are. -Through defeat, through captivity, through multiform -affliction, lay the path to the final deliverance of the -nation from the grosser forms of idolatry. When they -wept as they remembered Zion, when they took down -their harps from the willows by the water-courses of -Babylon to sing the Lord's song in a strange land, -they turned again—and at last with their whole heart—to -God their Saviour, who had done so great things -for them;—until the grey secret lingering in the East -was brightened by the Morning Star, and there was -revealed to the world a True Israel, and a New Jerusalem, -wherein the Lord should be King for evermore.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_411" id="Page_411">[Pg 411]</a></span></p> - - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXIII" id="CHAPTER_XXXIII">CHAPTER XXXIII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>JEHOAHAZ</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 608</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xxiii. 31-33</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"I went by, and, lo! he was gone: I sought him, but his place -could nowhere be found."—<span class="smcap">Psalm</span> xxxvii. 36.</p></blockquote> - -<p>It was under the disastrous circumstances which -attended his father's death at Megiddo that Jehoahaz -began to reign. There is some confusion about the -four sons of Josiah, whom the Chronicler calls Johanan, -Jehoiakim, Zedekiah, and Shallum.<a name="FNanchor_753_753" id="FNanchor_753_753"></a><a href="#Footnote_753_753" class="fnanchor">[753]</a> From Jer. xxii. 11, -it appears that Jehoahaz was the royal name taken on -his anointing by Shallum, the third son.<a name="FNanchor_754_754" id="FNanchor_754_754"></a><a href="#Footnote_754_754" class="fnanchor">[754]</a> If so, he -cannot be identified with Johanan, the firstborn, as in -the margin of our version. Further, it appears from -our historians that Jehoahaz was twenty-three at his -succession, and was therefore younger than Jehoiakim -who (three months later) succeeded him at the age of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_412" id="Page_412">[Pg 412]</a></span> -twenty-five. Jehoahaz was the own brother of Zedekiah, -Jehoiakim being his half-brother by another -mother (Zebudah).</p> - -<p>We do not know for what reason he was preferred -by "the people of the land" to his elder brother -Eliakim or Jehoiakim. It was probably because they -regarded him as a prince of eminent courage and -ability. The high hopes which the nation conceived of -him may be seen in the pathetic elegy of Ezek. xix.:—</p> - -<p> -"Moreover take thou up a lamentation for the princes of Israel, and say,—<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">What was thy mother? A lioness!</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Amidst lions she couched,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">In the midst of the young lions she nourished her whelps.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">She brought up one of her whelps: he became a young lion;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">He learned to catch the prey; he devoured men.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">The nations heard of him;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">In their pit was he taken,<a name="FNanchor_755_755" id="FNanchor_755_755"></a><a href="#Footnote_755_755" class="fnanchor">[755]</a></span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And they brought him with hooks into the land of Egypt."<a name="FNanchor_756_756" id="FNanchor_756_756"></a><a href="#Footnote_756_756" class="fnanchor">[756]</a></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>We see, too, that he was to an eminent degree the -darling of the nation in the still more plaintive wail of -Jeremiah which will be quoted later.</p> - -<p>The fact that Shallum solemnly changed his name -to Jehoahaz ("Jehovah taketh hold"),<a name="FNanchor_757_757" id="FNanchor_757_757"></a><a href="#Footnote_757_757" class="fnanchor">[757]</a> and that the -people of the land not only "made him king in his -father's stead," but also "anointed him," points to a -disputed succession.<a name="FNanchor_758_758" id="FNanchor_758_758"></a><a href="#Footnote_758_758" class="fnanchor">[758]</a> High hopes were conceived of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_413" id="Page_413">[Pg 413]</a></span> -him; but he hardly had a chance of fulfilling them, for -he was only permitted to reign three months. What -were the events of those months we do not know. -Jehoahaz must have disappointed any hopes which -may have been formed of him by the religious party; -for dear as he was to them, the historians record of -him that "he did that which was evil in the sight of -the Lord, according to all that his fathers had done," -although they specify no particular offence. The same -sad verdict is passed on all his four successors; but -Josephus says even more emphatically of Jehoahaz -that he was impious and impure.<a name="FNanchor_759_759" id="FNanchor_759_759"></a><a href="#Footnote_759_759" class="fnanchor">[759]</a></p> - -<p>He must have shown some activity in other respects, -or else Ezekiel would hardly have said that "the -nations heard of him," and that "he learned to catch -the prey; he devoured men." Over all his deeds, -whatever they may have been, "the iniquity of oblivion -has blindly scattered her poppy," and he fell a victim -to the great world-movements of those troublous -times.</p> - -<p>For Pharaoh, after his defeat of Josiah at Megiddo, -proceeded to make himself master of Syria and Palestine. -He took Cadytis, which Herodotus calls "a large city -of Syria,"<a name="FNanchor_760_760" id="FNanchor_760_760"></a><a href="#Footnote_760_760" class="fnanchor">[760]</a> and which—since it cannot here mean Gaza, -as in Herod., iii. 5—has been identified by some with -Kadesh. Thence he marched to Carchemish, on the -right bank of the Euphrates,<a name="FNanchor_761_761" id="FNanchor_761_761"></a><a href="#Footnote_761_761" class="fnanchor">[761]</a> none venturing to check -him, till "once more, after the lapse of nine centuries, -Egyptian garrisons looked down on that historic -stream."<a name="FNanchor_762_762" id="FNanchor_762_762"></a><a href="#Footnote_762_762" class="fnanchor">[762]</a> On his return he stopped at Riblah, on the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_414" id="Page_414">[Pg 414]</a></span> -Orontes,<a name="FNanchor_763_763" id="FNanchor_763_763"></a><a href="#Footnote_763_763" class="fnanchor">[763]</a> to consolidate his Syrian conquests; and there -he learnt that, without consulting him, the people of -Jerusalem had made Jehoahaz their king. Perhaps -he heard enough of the warlike prowess of Jehoahaz -to make him resent this act of independence. After -his three months' campaign he sent for Jehoahaz to -Riblah, and the unhappy prince had no choice but -to obey. Possibly the Egyptian party in Jerusalem, -headed by his disappointed elder brother Eliakim, may -have intrigued against him with Pharaoh Necho. When -he reached Riblah, he was unceremoniously deposed; -and though we may hope that the expression of Ezekiel, -that "they brought him with <i>hooks</i> into the land of -Egypt," belongs to the metaphor of the captured lion's -whelp, it is certain that he was taken to the banks -of the Nile as a fettered captive, never to return. How -long his miserable life was protracted, or how he -was treated in Egypt, we do not know. The sun of -the young prince went down in darkness while it was -yet day. No king of Judah before him had died in -prison and in exile, and the calamity smote heavily -the heart of his people. Egypt was not to escape—shortly -thereafter—the doom of violence and pride; -but whether the young Jewish king had died meanwhile -of a broken heart, or whether he dragged on -to hoar hairs his maimed life, or whether he was -murdered in his dungeon, no man knew. One thing -only was clear to the sad prophet—that he would -never return.</p> - -<p>"Weep ye not for the dead, neither bemoan him:<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_415" id="Page_415">[Pg 415]</a></span> -but weep ye sore for him that is gone away: for he -shall return no more, nor see his native country. For -thus saith Jehovah concerning Shallum, the son of -Josiah, King of Judah, which reigned instead of Josiah -his father, which went forth out of this place: 'He -shall not return thither any more: but in the place -whither they have led him captive there shall he die, -and he shall see this land no more.'"<a name="FNanchor_764_764" id="FNanchor_764_764"></a><a href="#Footnote_764_764" class="fnanchor">[764]</a></p> - -<p>To show his absolute power over Judah and Jerusalem, -Pharaoh Necho not only deposed and fettered -their king, but put the whole land under a yearly tribute -of one hundred talents of silver (about 40,000) and -a talent of gold (about 4,000).<a name="FNanchor_765_765" id="FNanchor_765_765"></a><a href="#Footnote_765_765" class="fnanchor">[765]</a></p> - -<p>Even this comparatively small sum was a heavy -burden for so greatly afflicted and impoverished a -country, and Pharaoh further imposed on them a vassal -to see that it was duly extorted. This was Eliakim, -the eldest living son of Josiah. There was nothing -left to plunder in the Temple or the palace, and therefore -the exaction had to be borne by the taxed and -suffering people.</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_416" id="Page_416">[Pg 416]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXIV" id="CHAPTER_XXXIV">CHAPTER XXXIV</a></h2> - -<h3><i>JEHOIAKIM</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 608-597</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xxiii. 36-xxiv. 7</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"But those things that are recorded of him, and of his uncleanness -and impiety, are written in the Chronicles of the Kings."—1 -<span class="smcap">Esdras</span> i. 42.</p> - -<p>"When Jehoiakim succeeded to the throne, he said, 'My predecessors -knew not how to provoke God.'"—<i>Sanhedrin</i>, f. 103, 2.</p></blockquote> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"There is no strange handwriting on the wall,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Through all the midnight hum no threatening call,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Nor on the marble floor the stealthy fall<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Of fatal footsteps. All is safe.—Thou fool,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">The avenging deities are shod with wool!"<br /></span> -<span class="i31"><span class="smcap">W. Allen Butler.</span><br /></span> -</div></div> - - -<p>Eliakim succeeded to the throne at the age of -twenty-five under very unenviable circumstances—as -a nominal king, a helpless nominee and tributary -of the Pharaoh. He seems to have been thoroughly -distasteful to the people; and if we may judge from the -fact that Ezekiel frankly ignores him and passes from -Jehoahaz to Jehoachin, he was regarded as a tax-gathering -usurper nominated by an alien tyrant. For -after speaking of Jehoahaz, Ezekiel says,—</p> - -<p> -<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_417" id="Page_417">[Pg 417]</a></span>"Now when she [Judah] saw that she had waited [for the restoration of Jehoahaz], and her hope was lost,<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Then she took another of her whelps;<a name="FNanchor_766_766" id="FNanchor_766_766"></a><a href="#Footnote_766_766" class="fnanchor">[766]</a></span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">A young lion she made him.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">He went up and down among the lions;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">He became a young lion."<a name="FNanchor_767_767" id="FNanchor_767_767"></a><a href="#Footnote_767_767" class="fnanchor">[767]</a></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>The historian says that Necho turned the name of -Eliakim ("God will establish") to Jehoiakim ("Jehovah -will establish"); but by this can hardly be meant more -than that he sanctioned the change of El into Jehovah -on Eliakim's installation upon the throne.</p> - -<p>Jehoiakim is condemned in the same terms as all -the other sons of Josiah. His misdoings are far more -definitely recorded in the Prophets, who furnish us with -details which are passed over by the historians. Some -of his sins may have been due to the influence of his wife -Nehushta, who was a daughter of Elnathan of Achbor, -one of the princes of the heathen party. It was this -Elnathan whom the king chose as a fitting ambassador -to demand the extradition of the prophet Urijah from -Egypt. One of the crimes with which Jehoiakim is -charged is the building for himself of a sumptuous -palace, and thus vainly trying to emulate the splendours -of Assyrian, Babylonian, and Egyptian kings. In itself -the act would not have been more wicked than it was -in Solomon, whose architectural parade is dwelt upon -with enthusiasm. But the circumstances were now -wholly different. Solomon was at that time in all his -glory, the possessor of boundless wealth, the ruler of an -immense and united territory, the head of a powerful -and prosperous people, the successor of an unconquered -hero who had gone to his grave in peace; Jehoiakim,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_418" id="Page_418">[Pg 418]</a></span> -on the other hand, had succeeded a father who had -died in defeat on the field of battle, and a brother -who was hopelessly pining in an Egyptian prison. The -Tribes had been carried into captivity by Assyria; the -nation was beaten, oppressed, and poor; the king himself -possessed but a shadow of royalty. In such a -condition of things it would have been his glory to -maintain a watchful and strenuous activity, and to devote -himself in simplicity and self-denial to the good -of his people. It showed a perverted and sensuous -mind to insult the misery of his subjects at such a -time by feeble attempts to rival heathen potentates in -costly stheticism. But this was not all; he carried -out his ignoble selfishness at the cost of oppression -and wrong.<a name="FNanchor_768_768" id="FNanchor_768_768"></a><a href="#Footnote_768_768" class="fnanchor">[768]</a></p> - -<p>It is possible that the prophet Habakkuk alludes -to him in the words:—</p> - -<p>"Woe to him that getteth an evil gain for his house, -that he may set his nest on high, that he may be -delivered from the hand of evil!<a name="FNanchor_769_769" id="FNanchor_769_769"></a><a href="#Footnote_769_769" class="fnanchor">[769]</a> Thou hast consulted -shame to thy house by cutting off many peoples, and -hast sinned against thy soul. For the stone shall cry -out of the wall, and the beam out of the timber shall -answer it."<a name="FNanchor_770_770" id="FNanchor_770_770"></a><a href="#Footnote_770_770" class="fnanchor">[770]</a></p> - -<p>The thought of the Jewish king's selfish expensiveness -may have crossed the mind of Habakkuk, though -the taunt is addressed directly to the Chaldans, and -especially to Nebuchadrezzar, who was at that time -revelling in the beautifying of Babylon, and especially<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_419" id="Page_419">[Pg 419]</a></span> -of his own royal palace. On the other hand, the rebuke, -or rather the denunciation, uttered by Jeremiah against -the king for this line of conduct, and for the forced -labour which it required, is terribly direct.</p> - -<p> -"'Woe unto him that buildeth his house by unrighteousness,<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And his chambers by wrong;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">That useth his neighbour's service without wages,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And giveth him not his hire;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">That saith, "I will build me a wide house and spacious chambers,"</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And cutteth out windows;</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And it is ceiled with cedar, and painted with vermilion.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Shalt thou reign because thou viest with the cedar?<a name="FNanchor_771_771" id="FNanchor_771_771"></a><a href="#Footnote_771_771" class="fnanchor">[771]</a></span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Did not thy father eat and drink, and do judgment and justice?</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Then it was well with him!</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Was not this to know Me?' saith the Lord.</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">'But thine heart is not but for thy dishonest gain,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And for to shed innocent blood,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And for oppression and for violence to do it.'"<a name="FNanchor_772_772" id="FNanchor_772_772"></a><a href="#Footnote_772_772" class="fnanchor">[772]</a></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>Then follows the stern message of doom which we -shall quote hereafter. The king's bad example stimulated -or perhaps emulated similar folly and want of -patriotism on the part of his nobles. They were -shepherds who destroyed and scattered the sheep -of Jehovah's pastures. But vain was their imagined -security, and their ostentation. The judgment was -imminent.<a name="FNanchor_773_773" id="FNanchor_773_773"></a><a href="#Footnote_773_773" class="fnanchor">[773]</a></p> - -<p>"O inhabitress of Lebanon, that makest thy nest in -the cedars," exclaims the prophet in bitter mockery, -"how greatly wilt thou groan when pangs come upon -thee, the pain as of a woman in travail!"<a name="FNanchor_774_774" id="FNanchor_774_774"></a><a href="#Footnote_774_774" class="fnanchor">[774]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_420" id="Page_420">[Pg 420]</a></span></p> - -<p>But Jehoiakim's offences were deadlier than this. -The Chronicler speaks of "the abominations which he -did"; and some have therefore supposed that the evil -state of things described by Jeremiah (xix.) refers to -this reign. If so, he plunged into the idolatry which -caused Judah to be shivered like a potter's vessel. -Certainly he sinned grievously against God in the -person of His prophets.</p> - -<p>Jeremiah was not the only prophet who disdained -the easy and traitorous popularity which was to be won -by prophesying "peace, peace," when there was no -peace. He had for his contemporary another messenger -of God, no less boldly explicit than himself—Urijah, -the son of Shemaiah of Kirjath-Jearim. Jeremiah had -as yet only prophesied in his humble native village -of Anathoth; he had not been called upon to face -"the swellings" or "the pride of Jordan."<a name="FNanchor_775_775" id="FNanchor_775_775"></a><a href="#Footnote_775_775" class="fnanchor">[775]</a> Urijah had -been in the fuller glare of publicity in the capital, and -his bold declaration that Jerusalem should fall before -Nebuchadrezzar and the Chaldans had excited such -a fury of indignation that he escaped into Egypt for his -life. Surely this should have appeased the rulers, even -if they chose to pay no attention to the Divine menace. -For the prophets were recognised deliverers of the -messages of Jehovah; and with scarcely an exception, -even in the most wicked reigns, their persons had been -regarded as sacrosanct. But Jehoiakim would not let -Urijah escape. He sent an embassy to Necho, headed -by his father-in-law Elnathan, son of Achbor, requesting -his extradition. Urijah had been dragged back from -Egypt, and, to the horror of the people, the king had -slain him with the sword, and flung his body into the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_421" id="Page_421">[Pg 421]</a></span> -graves of the common people.<a name="FNanchor_776_776" id="FNanchor_776_776"></a><a href="#Footnote_776_776" class="fnanchor">[776]</a> What made this conduct -more monstrous was the precedent of Micah the -Morasthite. He, in the days of Hezekiah, had prophesied,—</p> - -<p> -"Zion shall be ploughed as a field,<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And Jerusalem shall become heaps,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">And the Mountain of the House as the wooded heights."<a name="FNanchor_777_777" id="FNanchor_777_777"></a><a href="#Footnote_777_777" class="fnanchor">[777]</a></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>Yet so far from putting him to death, or even stirring -a finger against him, the pious king had only been -moved to repentance by the Divine threatenings. Thus -the blood of the first martyr-prophet, if we except the -case of Zechariah, had been shed by the son of Judah's -most pious king. Jeremiah himself only narrowly -escaped martyrdom. The precedent of Micah helped -to save him, though it had not saved Urijah. He was -far more powerfully protected by the patronage of the -princes and the people. Standing in the Temple court, -he had declared that, unless the nation repented, that -house should be like Shiloh, and the city a curse to -all the nations of the earth. Maddened by such words -of bold rebuke, the priests and the prophets and the -people had threatened him with death. But the princes -took his part, and some of the people came over to -them. His most powerful protector was Ahikam, the -son of Shaphan, a member of a family of the utmost -distinction.</p> - -<p>Meanwhile, we must follow for a time the outward -fortunes of the king and of the world.</p> - -<p>Necho, after his successful advance, had retired to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_422" id="Page_422">[Pg 422]</a></span> -Egypt, and Jehoiakim continued to be for three years -his obsequious servant. An event of tremendous -importance for the world changed the entire fortunes -of Egypt and of Judah. Nineveh fell with a crash -which terrified the nations. We might apply to her -the language which Isaiah applies to her successor, -Babylon:—</p> - -<p>"Sheol from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee -at thy coming: it stirreth up the shades for thee, even -the Rephaim of the earth; it hath raised up from their -thrones all the kings of the nations. All they shall -answer and say unto thee, 'Art thou also become weak -as we? art thou become like unto us?' ... All the kings -of the nations, all of them, sleep in glory, every one in -his own house. But thou art cast forth away from thy -sepulchre like an abominable branch, as the raiment of -those that are slain, that are thrust through with the -sword, that go down to the stones of the pit.... They -that see thee shall narrowly look upon thee ... and -say, 'Is this the man that made the earth to tremble? -that did shake kingdoms? that made the world as a -wilderness, and overthrew the cities thereof? that let -not loose his prisoners to their home?'"<a name="FNanchor_778_778" id="FNanchor_778_778"></a><a href="#Footnote_778_778" class="fnanchor">[778]</a></p> - -<p>Yes, Assyria had fallen like some mighty cedar in -Libanus, and the nations gazed without pity and with -exultation on his torn and scattered branches.</p> - -<p>And coincident with the fate of Nineveh had been the -rise of the Chaldan power.</p> - -<p>Nabupalussur<a name="FNanchor_779_779" id="FNanchor_779_779"></a><a href="#Footnote_779_779" class="fnanchor">[779]</a> had been a general of one of the last -Assyrian kings, and had been sent by him with an -army to quell a Babylonian revolt. Instead of this, -he seized the city and made himself king. When the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_423" id="Page_423">[Pg 423]</a></span> -final overthrow and obliteration of Nineveh had secured -his power, he sent his brave and brilliant son Nebuchadrezzar<a name="FNanchor_780_780" id="FNanchor_780_780"></a><a href="#Footnote_780_780" class="fnanchor">[780]</a> -(<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 605) to secure the provinces which he had -wrested from Assyria, and especially to regain possession -of Carchemish, which commanded the river.</p> - -<p>Necho marched to protect his conquests, and at -Carchemish the hostile forces encountered each other -in a tremendous battle,—immemorial Egypt under the -representative of its age-long Pharaohs; Babylon, with -her independence of yesterday, under a prince hitherto -unknown, whose name was to become one of the -most famous in the world. The result is described by -Jeremiah (xlvi. 1-12). Egypt was hopelessly defeated. -Her splendidly arrayed warriors were panic-stricken -and routed; her chief heroes were dashed to pieces -by the heavy maces of the Babylonians, or fled without -so much as looking back. The scene was one of -"Magor-missabib"—terror on every side.<a name="FNanchor_781_781" id="FNanchor_781_781"></a><a href="#Footnote_781_781" class="fnanchor">[781]</a> Pharaoh's -host came up like the Nile in flood with its Ethiopian -hoplites and Asiatic archers; but they were driven -back. The daughter of Egypt received a wound which -no balm of Gilead could cure. The nations heard of -her shame, and the prophet pronounced her further -chastisement by the hands of Nebuchadrezzar.</p> -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_424" id="Page_424">[Pg 424]</a></span></p> -<p>Then, in the fourth year of Jehoiakim, the young -Babylonian conqueror swept down upon Syria and -Palestine like a bounding leopard, like an avenging -eagle (Hab. i. 7, 8). Jehoiakim had no choice but -to change his vassalhood to Necho for a vassalage to -Nebuchadrezzar.<a name="FNanchor_782_782" id="FNanchor_782_782"></a><a href="#Footnote_782_782" class="fnanchor">[782]</a> He might have suffered severe consequences, -but tidings came to the young Chaldan that -his father had ended his reign of twenty-one years and -was dead. For fear lest disturbances might arise in -his capital, he at once dashed home across the desert -with some light troops by way of Tadmor, while he -told his general to follow him home through Syria by -the longer route. He seems, however, to have carried -away with him some captives, among whom were Daniel, -Ananias, Azarias, and Misael,<a name="FNanchor_783_783" id="FNanchor_783_783"></a><a href="#Footnote_783_783" class="fnanchor">[783]</a> destined hereafter for -such memorable fortunes. Jehoiakim himself was -thrown into fetters to be carried into Babylon; but the -conqueror changed his mind, and probably thought -that it would be safer for the present to accept his -pledges and assurances, and leave him as his viceroy. -"He took an oath of him," says Ezekiel (xvii. 13); -"he took also the mighty of the land."<a name="FNanchor_784_784" id="FNanchor_784_784"></a><a href="#Footnote_784_784" class="fnanchor">[784]</a></p> - -<p>For three years this frivolous egotist who occupied -the throne of Judah remained faithful to his covenant -with the King of Babylon, but at the end of that time -he rebelled. In this rebellion he was again deluded -by the glamour of Egypt, and reliance on the empty -promise of "horses and much people." Ezekiel openly<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_425" id="Page_425">[Pg 425]</a></span> -disapproved of this policy,<a name="FNanchor_785_785" id="FNanchor_785_785"></a><a href="#Footnote_785_785" class="fnanchor">[785]</a> and reproached the king for -his faithlessness to his oath. Jeremiah went further, -and declared in the plainest language that "Nebuchadrezzar -would certainly come up and destroy this land, -and cause to cease from thence both man and beast."<a name="FNanchor_786_786" id="FNanchor_786_786"></a><a href="#Footnote_786_786" class="fnanchor">[786]</a></p> - -<p>Nearer and nearer the danger came. At first the -King of Babylon was too busy to do more than send -against the Jewish rebel marauding bands of Chaldans, -who acted in concert with the hereditary depredators -of Judah—Syrians, Moabites, and Ammonites. But the -prophet knew that the danger would not end there, -believing that God would yet "remove Judah out of -His sight" for the unforgiven sins of Manasseh and -the innocent blood with which he had filled Jerusalem.<a name="FNanchor_787_787" id="FNanchor_787_787"></a><a href="#Footnote_787_787" class="fnanchor">[787]</a> -At last Nebuchadrezzar had time to turn closer attention -to the affairs of Judah, and this became necessary -because of the revolt of Tyre under its King Ithobalus. -In the stress of the peril Jehoiakim proclaimed a fast -and a day of humiliation in the Temple. Jeremiah was -at this time "shut up"—either in hiding, or in some -sort of custody. As he could not go and preach in -person, he dictated his prophecy to Baruch, who wrote -it on a scroll, and went in the prophet's place to read -it in the Lord's House to the people there assembled -from Jerusalem and all Judah in the chamber of -Gemariah, the son of Shaphan, in the inner court, by -the new gate.<a name="FNanchor_788_788" id="FNanchor_788_788"></a><a href="#Footnote_788_788" class="fnanchor">[788]</a> Gemariah was the brother of Ahikam, -the protector of the prophet.</p> - -<p>No one was more painfully alarmed by Jeremiah's -prophecy than Micaiah, the son of Gemariah, and he<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_426" id="Page_426">[Pg 426]</a></span> -thought it his duty to go and tell his father and the -other princes what he had heard. They were assembled -in the scribe's chamber, and sent a courtier -of Ethiopian race—Jehudi, the son of Cushi—bidding -him to bring the scroll with him, and to come to them.<a name="FNanchor_789_789" id="FNanchor_789_789"></a><a href="#Footnote_789_789" class="fnanchor">[789]</a></p> - -<p>Baruch was a person of distinction. He was the -brother of Seraiah, who is called in our A.V. "a quiet -prince," and in the margin "prince of Menucha" or -"chief chamberlain," literally "master of the resting-place"; -and he was the grandson of Maaseiah, "the -governor" of the city.<a name="FNanchor_790_790" id="FNanchor_790_790"></a><a href="#Footnote_790_790" class="fnanchor">[790]</a> The office imposed on him by -Jeremiah was so perilous and painful that it nearly -broke his heart. He exclaimed to Jeremiah, "Woe is -me now! the Lord hath added grief to my sorrow. I -am weary with my sighing, and I find no rest." The -answer which the prophet was commissioned to give -him was very remarkable. It confirmed the terrible -doom on his native land, but added, "'And seekest thou -great things for thyself? Seek them not. For, behold, -I will bring evil upon all flesh,' saith the Lord: 'but thy -life will I give unto thee for a prey in all places whither -thou goest.'"<a name="FNanchor_791_791" id="FNanchor_791_791"></a><a href="#Footnote_791_791" class="fnanchor">[791]</a></p> - -<p>Baruch obeyed the summons of the princes, and at -their request sat down with them and read the scroll -in their ears. When they had heard the portentous -prophecy, they turned shuddering to one another, and -said, "We must tell the king of all these words." -They asked Baruch how he had written them, and he -said he had taken them down at the prophet's dictation. -Then, knowing the storm which would burst over the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_427" id="Page_427">[Pg 427]</a></span> -bold offenders, they said, "Go, hide thee, thou and -Jeremiah, and let no man know where ye be."</p> - -<p>Not daring to imperil the awful document, they laid -it up in the chamber of Elishama, the scribe, but went -to the king and told him its contents. He sent Jehudi -to fetch it, and to read it in their hearing. Jehoiakim -and the illustrious company were seated in the winter-chamber; -for it was October, and a fire was burning -in the brazier, where Jehoiakim sat warming himself in -the chilly weather.</p> - -<p>As he listened, he was filled not only with fury, but -with contempt. Such a message might well have -caused him and his worst counsellors to rend their -clothes; but instead of this they adopted a tone of defiance. -By the time that Jehudi had read three or four -columns, Jehoiakim snatched the scribe's knife which -hung at his girdle, and began to cut up the scroll, -with the intention of burning it. Seeing his purpose, -Gemariah, Elnathan, and Seraiah entreated him not to -destroy it. But he would not listen. He flung the -fragments into the brazier, and they were consumed. -He ordered his son Jerahmeel,<a name="FNanchor_792_792" id="FNanchor_792_792"></a><a href="#Footnote_792_792" class="fnanchor">[792]</a> with Seraiah and -Shelemiah, to seize both Baruch and Jeremiah, and -bring them before him for punishment. Doubtless -they would have suffered the fate of Urijah, but -"the Lord hid them." There were enough persons -of power on their side to render their hiding-place -secure.</p> - -<p>But the king's impious indifference, so far from -making any difference in the things that were, only -brought down upon his guilt a fearful doom. Truth<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_428" id="Page_428">[Pg 428]</a></span> -cannot be cut to pieces, or burnt, or mechanically -suppressed.</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Truth, crushed to earth, shall rise again;<br /></span> -<span class="i3">The eternal years of God are hers:<br /></span> -<span class="i1">But error, vanquished, writhes in pain,<br /></span> -<span class="i3">And dies amid her worshippers."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>All the former denunciations, and new ones added -to them, were rewritten by Jeremiah and his faithful -friend in their hiding-place, and among them these -words<a name="FNanchor_793_793" id="FNanchor_793_793"></a><a href="#Footnote_793_793" class="fnanchor">[793]</a>:—</p> - -<p>"Thus saith the Lord of Jehoiakim, King of Judah, -'He shall have none to sit upon the throne of David; -and his dead body shall be cast out in the day to the -heat, and in the night to the frost.'"</p> - -<p>A frightful drought added to the misery of this reign, -but failed to bring the wretched king to his senses. -Jeremiah describes it<a name="FNanchor_794_794" id="FNanchor_794_794"></a><a href="#Footnote_794_794" class="fnanchor">[794]</a>:—</p> - -<p>"Judah mourneth, and the gates thereof languish; -they bow down mourning unto the ground; and the cry -of Jerusalem is gone up. And the nobles send their -menials to the waters: they come to the pits, and find -no water; they return with their vessels empty; they -are ashamed and confounded, and cover their heads, -because of the ground which is chapped, for that no -rain hath been in the land.... Yea, the hind also in -the field calveth, and forsaketh her young, because -there is no grass. And the wild asses stand on the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_429" id="Page_429">[Pg 429]</a></span> -bare heights, they pant for air like jackals; their eyes -fail, because there is no herbage."</p> - -<p>Even this affliction, so vividly and pathetically described, -failed to waken any repentance. And then the -doom fell. Nebuchadrezzar advanced in person against -Jerusalem.<a name="FNanchor_795_795" id="FNanchor_795_795"></a><a href="#Footnote_795_795" class="fnanchor">[795]</a> Even the hardy nomad Rechabites had to -fly before the Chaldans, and to take refuge in the cities -which they hated. The sacred historian tells us nothing -as to the manner of the death of Jehoiakim, only saying -that he "slept with his fathers": his narrative of this -period is exceedingly meagre. Josephus says that -Nebuchadrezzar slew him and the flower of the citizens, -and sent three thousand captives to Babylon.<a name="FNanchor_796_796" id="FNanchor_796_796"></a><a href="#Footnote_796_796" class="fnanchor">[796]</a> Some -imagine that he was killed by the Babylonians in a raid -outside the walls of Jerusalem, or "murdered by his -own people, and his body thrown for a time outside the -walls." If so, the Babylonians did not war with the -dead. His remains, after this "burial of an ass,"<a name="FNanchor_797_797" id="FNanchor_797_797"></a><a href="#Footnote_797_797" class="fnanchor">[797]</a> may -have been finally suffered to rest in a tomb. The -Septuagint says (2 Chron. xxxvi. 8) that he was -buried "in Ganosan," by which may be meant the -sepulchre of Manasseh in the garden of Uzza.<a name="FNanchor_798_798" id="FNanchor_798_798"></a><a href="#Footnote_798_798" class="fnanchor">[798]</a> Not<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_430" id="Page_430">[Pg 430]</a></span> -for him was the wailing cry "<i>Ho, adon! Ho, hodo!</i>" -("Ah, Lord! Ah, his glory!").</p> - -<p>"The memory of the wicked shall rot." Certainly -this was the case with Jehoiakim. The Chronicler -mysteriously alludes to "his abominations which he -did, <i>and that which was found in him</i>."<a name="FNanchor_799_799" id="FNanchor_799_799"></a><a href="#Footnote_799_799" class="fnanchor">[799]</a> The Rabbis, -interpreting this after their manner, say that "the thing -found" was the name of the demon Codonazor, to whom -he had sold himself, which after his death was discovered -legibly written in Hebrew letters on his skin. "Rabbi -Johanan and Rabbi Eleazar debated what was meant -by 'that which was found on him.' One said that he -tattooed the name of an idol upon his body (אמתו), and -the other said that he had tattooed the name of the -god Recreon."<a name="FNanchor_800_800" id="FNanchor_800_800"></a><a href="#Footnote_800_800" class="fnanchor">[800]</a></p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_431" id="Page_431">[Pg 431]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXV" id="CHAPTER_XXXV">CHAPTER XXXV</a></h2> - -<h3><i>JEHOIACHIN</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 597</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xxiv. 8-16</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"There are times when ancient truths become modern falsehoods, -when the signs of God's dispensations are made so clear by the -course of natural events as to supersede the revelations of even their -most sacred past."—<span class="smcap">Stanley</span>, <i>Lectures</i>, ii. 521.</p></blockquote> - - -<p>Jehoiachin—"Jehovah maketh steadfast"—who -is also called Jeconiah, and—perhaps with intentional -slight—Coniah, succeeded, at the age of eighteen, to -the miserable and distracted heritage of the throne of -Judah. The "eight years old" of the Chronicler must -be a clerical error, for he had a harem. He only reigned -for three months; and the historian pronounces over -him, as over all the four kings of the House of Josiah, -the stereotyped condemnation of evil-doing. Was there -anything in the manner in which Josiah had trained his -family which could account for their unsatisfactoriness? -In Jehoiachin's case we do not know what his transgressions -were, but perhaps his mother's influence -rendered him as little favourable to the prophetic party -as his brother Jehoiakim had been. For the <i>Gebrah</i> -was Nehushta, the daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem. -Her name means apparently "Brass," and nothing can be -deduced from it; but her father Elnathan was (as we<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_432" id="Page_432">[Pg 432]</a></span> -have seen) the envoy who, by order of Jehoiakim, -had dragged back from Egypt the martyr-prophet -Urijah.<a name="FNanchor_801_801" id="FNanchor_801_801"></a><a href="#Footnote_801_801" class="fnanchor">[801]</a></p> - -<p>Brief as was his reign of three months and ten days<a name="FNanchor_802_802" id="FNanchor_802_802"></a><a href="#Footnote_802_802" class="fnanchor">[802]</a>—a -hundred days, like that of his unhappy uncle -Jehoahaz—he is largely alluded to by the contemporary -prophets.</p> - -<p>Indignant at the sins and apostasies of Judah, and -convinced that her retribution was nigh at hand, -Jeremiah took with him an earthen pot to the Valley -of Hinnom, and there shivered it to pieces at Tophet -in the presence of certain elders of the people and of -the priests, explaining that his symbolic action indicated -the destruction of Jerusalem. On hearing the tenor -of these prophecies, the priest Pashur, who was officer -of the Temple, smote Jeremiah in the face, and put him -in the stocks in a prominent place by the Temple gate.<a name="FNanchor_803_803" id="FNanchor_803_803"></a><a href="#Footnote_803_803" class="fnanchor">[803]</a> -Jeremiah in return prophesied that Pashur and all his -family should be carried into captivity, so that his name -should be changed from Pashur to Magor-Missabib, -"Terror on every side."</p> - -<p>Against the king himself he pronounced the doom: -"'As I live,' saith the Lord, 'though Coniah, the son -of Jehoiakim, King of Judah, were the signet on My -right hand, yet will I pluck thee thence; and I will -give thee into the hands of them that seek thy life, ... -even into the hand of Nebuchadrezzar.... And I will -hurl thee, and thy mother that bare thee, into another<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_433" id="Page_433">[Pg 433]</a></span> -country;<a name="FNanchor_804_804" id="FNanchor_804_804"></a><a href="#Footnote_804_804" class="fnanchor">[804]</a> ... and there shall ye die.' ... Is this man -Coniah a despised broken piece of work? is he a -vessel wherein is no pleasure? wherefore are they -hurled, he and his seed, and cast into a land which -they know not? O land, land, land! hear the word -of the Lord. Thus saith the Lord, 'Write ye this -man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his -days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting -upon the throne of David, or ruling any more in -Judah.'"</p> - -<p>Yet there must have been something in Jeconiah -which impressed favourably the minds of men. Brief -as was his reign, his memory was never forgotten. We -learn from the <i>Mishna</i> that one of the gates of Jerusalem—probably -that by which he left the city—for ever -bore his name.<a name="FNanchor_805_805" id="FNanchor_805_805"></a><a href="#Footnote_805_805" class="fnanchor">[805]</a> Josephus says that his captivity -was annually commemorated. Jeremiah writes in the -Lamentations:—</p> - -<p>"Our pursuers are swifter than the eagles of heaven: -they have pursued us upon the mountains, they have -laid wait for us in the wilderness. The breath of our -nostrils, the anointed of the Lord, was taken in their -pits, of whom we said, 'Under his shadow we shall live -among the heathen.'"</p> - -<p>Ezekiel compares him to a young lion:—</p> - -<p>"He went up and down among the lions, he became -a young lion, and learned to catch the prey. And he -knew their palaces, and laid waste their cities; and the -land was desolate, and the fulness thereof, by the -noise of his roaring. Then the nations set against him<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_434" id="Page_434">[Pg 434]</a></span> -on every side from the provinces, and spread their net -over him: he was taken in their pit. And they put -him in ward in hooks, and brought him to the King -of Babylon: they brought him into holds, that his -voice should no more be heard upon the mountains -of Israel."<a name="FNanchor_806_806" id="FNanchor_806_806"></a><a href="#Footnote_806_806" class="fnanchor">[806]</a></p> - -<p>A prince of whom a contemporary prophet could -thus write was obviously no <i>fainant</i>. Indeed, the -energetic measures which Nebuchadrezzar adopted -against him may have been due to the fact that he -had endeavoured to rouse his discouraged people. -But what could he do against such a power as that -of the Chaldans? Nebuchadrezzar sent his generals -against Jerusalem; and when it was ripe for capture, -advanced in person to take possession of it. Resistance -had become hopeless; there lay no chance in -anything but that complete submission which might -possibly avert the worst effects of the destruction of -the city. Accordingly, Jeconiah, accompanied by his -mother, his court, his princes, and his officers, went -out in procession, and threw themselves on the mercy -of the King of Babylon. Nebuchadrezzar was far less -brutal than the Sargons and Assurbanipals of Assyria; -but Judah had twice revolted, and the defection of -Tyre showed him that the affairs of Palestine could -no longer be neglected. He thoroughly despoiled the -Temple and the palace, and carried the spoils to -Babylon, as Isaiah had forewarned Hezekiah should -be the case.<a name="FNanchor_807_807" id="FNanchor_807_807"></a><a href="#Footnote_807_807" class="fnanchor">[807]</a> That he might further weaken and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_435" id="Page_435">[Pg 435]</a></span> -humiliate the city, he stripped it of its king, its royal -house, its court, its nobles, its soldiers, even its craftsmen -and smiths, and carried ten thousand eight hundred -and thirty-two captives to Babylon (Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, X. -vii. 1), among whom was the prophet Ezekiel. He -naturally spared Jeremiah, who regarded him as "the -sword of Jehovah" (Jer. xlvii. 6), and as "Jehovah's -servant, to do His pleasure" (Jer. xxv. 9, xxvii. 6, -xliii. 10). On the whole, Nebuchadrezzar is not treated -with abhorrence by the Jews. There was something -in his character which inspired respect; and the Jews -deal with him leniently, both in their records and -generally in their traditions. "Nebuchadnezzar," we -read in the Talmud (<i>Taanith</i> f. 18, 2), "was a worthy -king, and deserved that a miracle should be performed -through him."</p> - -<p>From the allusion of Ezekiel we might infer that -Jehoiachin was violent and self-willed; but Josephus -speaks of his kindness and gentleness.<a name="FNanchor_808_808" id="FNanchor_808_808"></a><a href="#Footnote_808_808" class="fnanchor">[808]</a> Was he, as -Jeremiah had prophesied, literally "childless"?<a name="FNanchor_809_809" id="FNanchor_809_809"></a><a href="#Footnote_809_809" class="fnanchor">[809]</a> It is -true that in 1 Chron. iii. 17, 18, eight sons are ascribed -to him, and among them Shealtiel, in whom the -royal line was continued. But it is far from certain -that these sons were not the sons of his brother Neri, -of the House of Nathan,<a name="FNanchor_810_810" id="FNanchor_810_810"></a><a href="#Footnote_810_810" class="fnanchor">[810]</a> and it seems that they were -only adopted by the unhappy captive. The Book of -Baruch describes him weeping by the Euphrates.<a name="FNanchor_811_811" id="FNanchor_811_811"></a><a href="#Footnote_811_811" class="fnanchor">[811]</a> But<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_436" id="Page_436">[Pg 436]</a></span> -if we may trust the story of Susannah, his outward -fortunes were peaceful, and he was allowed to live in -his own house and gardens in peace, and in a certain -degree of splendour.<a name="FNanchor_812_812" id="FNanchor_812_812"></a><a href="#Footnote_812_812" class="fnanchor">[812]</a></p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_437" id="Page_437">[Pg 437]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXVI" id="CHAPTER_XXXVI">CHAPTER XXXVI</a></h2> - -<h3><i>ZEDEKIAH, THE LAST KING OF JUDAH</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 597-586</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xxiv. 18-xxv. 7</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"Quand ce grand Dieu a choisi quelqu'un pour tre l'instrument -de ses desseins rien n'arrte le cours, o il enchaine, o il aveugle, o -il dompte tout ce qui est capable de rsistance." -</p> -<p class="signature2"> -<span class="smcap">Bossuet</span>, <i>Oraison funbre de Henriette Marie</i>.<br /> -</p></blockquote> - - -<p>When Jehoiachin was carried captive to Babylon, -never to return, his uncle Mattaniah -("Jehovah's gift"), the third son of Josiah, was put -by Nebuchadrezzar in his place. In solemn ratification -of the new king's authority, the Babylonian conqueror -sanctioned the change of his name to Zedekiah ("Jehovah's -righteousness").<a name="FNanchor_813_813" id="FNanchor_813_813"></a><a href="#Footnote_813_813" class="fnanchor">[813]</a> He was twenty-one at his -accession, and he reigned eleven years.</p> - -<p>"Behold," writes Ezekiel, "the King of Babylon -came to Jerusalem, and took the king thereof, and the -princes thereof, and brought them to him to Babylon; -and he took of the seed royal" (<i>i.e.</i>, Zedekiah), "<i>and -made a covenant with him; he also brought him under -an oath: and took away the mighty of the land, that the -kingdom might be base, that it might not lift itself up, -but that by keeping of his covenant it might stand</i>."<a name="FNanchor_814_814" id="FNanchor_814_814"></a><a href="#Footnote_814_814" class="fnanchor">[814]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_438" id="Page_438">[Pg 438]</a></span></p> - -<p>Perhaps by this covenant Zechariah meant to emphasise -the meaning of his name, and to show that he -would reign in righteousness.</p> - -<p>The prophet at the beginning of the chapter describes -Nebuchadrezzar and Jehoiachin in "a riddle."</p> - -<p>"A great eagle," he says, "with great wings and -long pinions, full of feathers, which had divers colours, -came unto Lebanon, and took the top of the cedar" -(Jehoiachin): "he cropped off the topmost of the young -twigs thereof, and carried it into a land of traffic; he -set it in a city of merchants. He took also of the seed -of the land" (Zedekiah), "and planted it in a fruitful soil; -he placed it beside great waters, he set it as a willow -tree. And it grew, and became a spreading vine of low -stature, whose branches turned towards him, and the -roots thereof were under him: so it became a vine, and -brought forth branches, and shot forth sprigs."<a name="FNanchor_815_815" id="FNanchor_815_815"></a><a href="#Footnote_815_815" class="fnanchor">[815]</a></p> - -<p>The words refer to the first three years of Zedekiah's -reign, and they imply, consistently with the views of -the prophets, that, if the weak king had been content -with the lowly eminence to which God had called him, -and if he had kept his oath and covenant with Babylon, -all might yet have been well with him and his land. -At first it seemed likely to be so; for Zedekiah wished -to be faithful to Jehovah. He made a covenant with -all the people to set free their Hebrew slaves. Alas! -it was very shortlived. Self-sacrifice cost something, -and the princes soon took back the discarded bondservants.<a name="FNanchor_816_816" id="FNanchor_816_816"></a><a href="#Footnote_816_816" class="fnanchor">[816]</a> -What made this conduct the more shocking -was that their covenant to obey the law had been made -in the most solemn manner by "cutting a calf in twain, -and passing between the severed halves."<a name="FNanchor_817_817" id="FNanchor_817_817"></a><a href="#Footnote_817_817" class="fnanchor">[817]</a> But the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_439" id="Page_439">[Pg 439]</a></span> -weak king was perfectly powerless in the hands of his -tyrannous aristocracy.<a name="FNanchor_818_818" id="FNanchor_818_818"></a><a href="#Footnote_818_818" class="fnanchor">[818]</a></p> - -<p>The exiles in Babylon were now the best and most -important section of the nation. Jeremiah compares -them to good figs; while the remnant at Jerusalem were -bad and withered. He and Ezekiel raised their voices, -as in strophe and antistrophe, for the teaching alike of -the exiles and of the remnant left at Jerusalem, for -whom the exiles were bidden to entreat God in prayer. -Zedekiah himself made at least one journey northward, -either voluntarily or under summons, to renew his -oath and reassure Nebuchadrezzar of his fidelity.<a name="FNanchor_819_819" id="FNanchor_819_819"></a><a href="#Footnote_819_819" class="fnanchor">[819]</a> He -was accompanied by Seraiah, the brother of Baruch, -who was privately entrusted by Jeremiah with a prophecy -of the fall of Babylon, which he was to fling into -the midst of the Euphrates.<a name="FNanchor_820_820" id="FNanchor_820_820"></a><a href="#Footnote_820_820" class="fnanchor">[820]</a></p> - -<p>The last King of Judah seems to have been weak -rather than wicked. He was a reed shaken by the -wind. He yielded to the influence of the last person -who argued with him; and he seems to have dreaded -above all things the personal ridicule, danger, and opposition -which it was his duty to have defied. Yet we -cannot withhold from him our deep sympathy; for he -was born in terrible times—to witness the death-throes -of his country's agony, and to share in them. It was -no longer a question of independence, but only of the -choice of servitudes. Judah was like a silly and trembling -sheep between two huge beasts of prey.<a name="FNanchor_821_821" id="FNanchor_821_821"></a><a href="#Footnote_821_821" class="fnanchor">[821]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_440" id="Page_440">[Pg 440]</a></span></p> - -<p>Only thus can we account for the strange apostasies—"the -abominations of the heathen"—with which he -permitted the Temple to be polluted; and for the ill-treatment -which he allowed to be inflicted on Jeremiah -and other prophets, to whom in his heart he felt inclined -to listen.</p> - -<p>What these abominations were we read with amazement -in the eighth chapter of Ezekiel. The prophet -is carried in vision to Jerusalem, and there he sees the -Asherah—"the image which provoketh to jealousy"—which -had so often been erected and destroyed and re-erected. -Then through a secret door he sees creeping -things, and abominable beasts, and the idol-blocks of the -House of Israel portrayed upon the wall, while several -elders of Israel stood before them and adored, with -censers in their hands—among whom he must specially -have grieved to see Jaazaneiah, the son of Shaphan,<a name="FNanchor_822_822" id="FNanchor_822_822"></a><a href="#Footnote_822_822" class="fnanchor">[822]</a> -flattering himself, as did his followers, that in that dark -chamber Jehovah saw them not. Next at the northern -gate he sees Zion's daughters weeping for Tammuz, or -Adonis. Once more, in the inner court of the Temple, -between the porch and the altar, he sees about twenty-five -men with their backs to the altar, and their faces to -the east; and they worshipped the sun towards the east; -and, lo! they put the vine branch to their nose.<a name="FNanchor_823_823" id="FNanchor_823_823"></a><a href="#Footnote_823_823" class="fnanchor">[823]</a> Were -not these crimes sufficient to evoke the wrath of Jehovah, -and to alienate His ear from prayers offered by such -polluted worshippers? Egypt, Assyria, Syria, Chalda,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_441" id="Page_441">[Pg 441]</a></span> -all contributed their idolatrous elements to the detestable -syncretism; and the king and the priests ignored, permitted, -or connived at it.<a name="FNanchor_824_824" id="FNanchor_824_824"></a><a href="#Footnote_824_824" class="fnanchor">[824]</a> This must surely be answered -for. How could it have been otherwise? The king -and the priests were the official guardians of the -Temple, and these aberrations could not have gone on -without their cognisance. There was another party -of sheer formalists, headed by men like the priest -Pashur, who thought to make talismans of rites and -shibboleths, but had no sincerity of heart-religion.<a name="FNanchor_825_825" id="FNanchor_825_825"></a><a href="#Footnote_825_825" class="fnanchor">[825]</a> To -these, too, Jeremiah was utterly opposed. In his -opinion Josiah's reformation had failed. Neither Ark, -nor Temple, nor sacrifice were anything in the world -to him in comparison with true religion. All the -prophets with scarcely one exception are anti-ritualists; -but none more decidedly so than the prophet-priest. -His name is associated in tradition with the hiding -of the Ark, and a belief in its ultimate restoration; yet -to Jeremiah, apart from the moral and spiritual truths -of which it was the material symbol, the Ark was no -better than a wooden chest. His message from Jehovah -is, "I will give you pastors according to My heart, ... -and they shall say no more, 'The Ark of the Covenant -of the Lord': neither shall it come to mind; neither -shall they remember it; neither shall they miss it; -neither shall it be made any more."<a name="FNanchor_826_826" id="FNanchor_826_826"></a><a href="#Footnote_826_826" class="fnanchor">[826]</a></p> - -<p>Doom followed the guilt and folly of king, priests, -and people. If political wisdom were insufficient to -show Zedekiah that the necessities of the case were an -indication of God's will, he had the warnings of the -prophets constantly ringing in his ears, and the assurance<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_442" id="Page_442">[Pg 442]</a></span> -that he must remain faithful to Nebuchadrezzar. -But he was in fear of his own princes and courtiers. -A combined embassy reached him from the kings of -Edom, Ammon, Moab, Tyre and Sidon, urging him -to join in a league against Babylon.<a name="FNanchor_827_827" id="FNanchor_827_827"></a><a href="#Footnote_827_827" class="fnanchor">[827]</a> This embassy -was supported by a powerful party in Jerusalem. Their -solicitations were rendered more plausible by the recent -accession (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 590) of the young and vigorous Pharaoh -Hophrah—the Apries of Herodotus<a name="FNanchor_828_828" id="FNanchor_828_828"></a><a href="#Footnote_828_828" class="fnanchor">[828]</a>—to the throne of -Egypt, and by the recrudescence of that incurable -disease of Hebrew politics, a confidence in the idle -promises of Egypt to supply the confederacy with men -and horses.<a name="FNanchor_829_829" id="FNanchor_829_829"></a><a href="#Footnote_829_829" class="fnanchor">[829]</a> In vain did Jeremiah and Ezekiel uplift -their warning voices. The blind confidence of the king -and of the nobles was sustained by the flattering visions -and promises of false prophets, prominent among whom -was a certain Hananiah, the son of Azur, of Gibeon, -"the prophet."<a name="FNanchor_830_830" id="FNanchor_830_830"></a><a href="#Footnote_830_830" class="fnanchor">[830]</a> To indicate the futility of the contemplated -rebellion, Jeremiah had made "throngs and -poles" with yokes, and had sent them to the kings, -whose embassy had reached Jerusalem, with a message -of the most emphatic distinctness, that Nebuchadrezzar -was God's appointed servant, and that they must serve -him till God's own appointed time. If they obeyed this -intimation, they would be left undisturbed in their own -lands; if they disobeyed it, they would be scourged into -absolute submission by the sword, the famine, and the -pestilence. Jeremiah delivered the same oracle to his -own king.<a name="FNanchor_831_831" id="FNanchor_831_831"></a><a href="#Footnote_831_831" class="fnanchor">[831]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_443" id="Page_443">[Pg 443]</a></span></p> - -<p>The warning was rendered unavailing by the conduct -of Hananiah. He prophesied that within two full years -God would break the yoke of the King of Babylon; and -that the captive Jeconiah, and the nobles, and the -vessels of the House of the Lord would be brought -back. Jeremiah, by way of an acted parable, had worn -round his neck one of his own yokes. Hananiah, in -the Temple, snatched it off, broke it to pieces, and said, -"So will I break the yoke of Nebuchadrezzar from the -neck of all nations within the space of two full years."<a name="FNanchor_832_832" id="FNanchor_832_832"></a><a href="#Footnote_832_832" class="fnanchor">[832]</a></p> - -<p>We can imagine the delight, the applause, the enthusiasm -with which the assembled people listened to -these bold predictions. Hananiah argued with them, -to speak, in shorthand, for he appealed to their -desires and to their prejudices. It is always the tendency -of nations to say to their prophets, "Say not -unto us hard things: speak smooth things; prophesy -deceits."</p> - -<p>Against Hananiah personally there seems to have -been no charge, except that in listening to the lying -spirit of his own desires he could not hear the true -message of God. But he did not stand alone.<a name="FNanchor_833_833" id="FNanchor_833_833"></a><a href="#Footnote_833_833" class="fnanchor">[833]</a> Among -the children of the captivity, his promises were echoed -by two downright false prophets, Ahab and Zedekiah, -the son of Maaseiah, who prophesied lies in God's -name. They were men of evil life, and a fearful fate -overtook them. Their words against Babylon came to -the ears of Nebuchadrezzar, and they were "roasted in -the fire," so that the horror of their end passed into<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_444" id="Page_444">[Pg 444]</a></span> -a proverb and a curse.<a name="FNanchor_834_834" id="FNanchor_834_834"></a><a href="#Footnote_834_834" class="fnanchor">[834]</a> Truly God fed these false -prophets with wormwood, and gave them poisonous -water to drink.<a name="FNanchor_835_835" id="FNanchor_835_835"></a><a href="#Footnote_835_835" class="fnanchor">[835]</a></p> - -<p>After the action of Hananiah, Jeremiah went home -stricken and ashamed: apparently he never again -uttered a public discourse in the Temple. It took -him by surprise; and he was for the moment, perhaps, -daunted by the plausive echo of the multitude to the -lying prophet. But when he got home the answer of -Jehovah came: "Go and tell Hananiah, Thou hast -broken the yokes of wood; but thou hast made for them -yokes of iron. I have put a yoke of iron on the necks of -all these nations, that they may serve Nebuchadrezzar. -Hear now, Hananiah, The Lord hath not sent thee: -thou makest this people to trust in a lie. Behold, this -year thou shalt die, because thou hast spoken revolt -against the Lord. What hath the chaff to do with the -wheat? saith the Lord."<a name="FNanchor_836_836" id="FNanchor_836_836"></a><a href="#Footnote_836_836" class="fnanchor">[836]</a></p> - -<p>Two months after Hananiah lay dead, and men's -minds were filled with fear. They saw that God's -word was indeed as a fire to burn, and as a hammer -to dash in pieces.<a name="FNanchor_837_837" id="FNanchor_837_837"></a><a href="#Footnote_837_837" class="fnanchor">[837]</a> But meanwhile Zedekiah had been -over-persuaded to take the course which the true -prophets had forbidden. Misled by the false prophets -and mincing prophetesses whom Ezekiel denounced,<a name="FNanchor_838_838" id="FNanchor_838_838"></a><a href="#Footnote_838_838" class="fnanchor">[838]</a> -who daubed men's walls with whitened plaster, he had -sent an embassy to Pharaoh Hophrah, asking for an -army of infantry and cavalry to support his rebellion -from Assyria.<a name="FNanchor_839_839" id="FNanchor_839_839"></a><a href="#Footnote_839_839" class="fnanchor">[839]</a> In the eyes of Jeremiah and Ezekiel -the crime did not only consist in defying the exhortations -of those whom Zedekiah knew to be Jehovah's<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_445" id="Page_445">[Pg 445]</a></span> -accredited messengers. In mitigation of this offence -he might have pleaded the extreme difficulty of discriminating -the truth amid the ceaseless babble of false -pretenders.<a name="FNanchor_840_840" id="FNanchor_840_840"></a><a href="#Footnote_840_840" class="fnanchor">[840]</a> But, on the other hand, he had broken -the solemn oath which he had taken to Nebuchadrezzar -in the name of God, and the sacred covenant which he -seems to have twice ratified with him.<a name="FNanchor_841_841" id="FNanchor_841_841"></a><a href="#Footnote_841_841" class="fnanchor">[841]</a> This it was -which raised the indignation of the faithful, and led -Ezekiel to prophesy:—</p> - -<p> -"Shall he prosper?<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Shall he escape that doeth such things?</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Or shall he break the covenant and be believed?</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">'As I live,' saith the Lord God, 'surely in the place where the king dwelleth that made him king,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Whose oath he despised and whose covenant he broke,</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 0.5em;">Even with him in the midst of Babylon, shall he die.'"<a name="FNanchor_842_842" id="FNanchor_842_842"></a><a href="#Footnote_842_842" class="fnanchor">[842]</a></span><br /> -</p> - -<p>Sad close for a dynasty which had now lasted for -nearly five centuries!</p> - -<p>As for Pharaoh, he too was an eagle, as Nebuchadrezzar -was—a great eagle with great wings and many -feathers, but not so great. The trailing vine of Judah -bent her roots towards him, but it should wither in -the furrows when the east wind touched it.<a name="FNanchor_843_843" id="FNanchor_843_843"></a><a href="#Footnote_843_843" class="fnanchor">[843]</a></p> - -<p>The result of Zedekiah's alliance with Egypt was -the intermission of his yearly tribute to Assyria; and -at last, in the ninth year of Zedekiah, Nebuchadrezzar -was aroused to put down this Palestinian revolt, supported -as it was by the vague magnificence of Egypt.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_446" id="Page_446">[Pg 446]</a></span> -Jeremiah had said, "Pharaoh, the King of Egypt, is -but a noise [or desolation]: he hath passed the time -appointed."<a name="FNanchor_844_844" id="FNanchor_844_844"></a><a href="#Footnote_844_844" class="fnanchor">[844]</a></p> - -<p>This was about the year 589. In 598 Nebuchadrezzar -had carried Jehoachin into captivity, and ever since then -some of his forces had been engaged in the vain effort -to capture Tyre, which still, after a ten years' siege, -drew its supplies from the sea, and remained impregnable -on her island rock. He did not choose to raise -this long-continued siege by diverting the troops to -beleaguer so strong a fortress as Jerusalem, and therefore -he came in person from Babylon.</p> - -<p>In Ezek. xxi. 20-24 we have a singular and vivid -glimpse of his march. On his way he came to a spot -where two roads branched off before him. One led -to Rabbath, the capital of Ammon, on the east of -Jordan; the other to Jerusalem, on the west. Which -road should he take? Personally, it was a matter of -indifference; so he threw the burden of responsibility -upon his gods by leaving the decision to the result of -belomancy.<a name="FNanchor_845_845" id="FNanchor_845_845"></a><a href="#Footnote_845_845" class="fnanchor">[845]</a> Taking in his hand a sheaf of brightened -arrows, he held them upright, and decided to take the -route indicated by the fall of the greater number of -arrows. He confirmed his uncertainty by consulting -teraphim, and by hepatoscopy—<i>i.e.</i>, by examining the -liver of slain victims. Rabbath and the Ammonites -were not to be spared, but it was upon the covenant-breaking -king and city that the first vengeance was<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_447" id="Page_447">[Pg 447]</a></span> -to fall.<a name="FNanchor_846_846" id="FNanchor_846_846"></a><a href="#Footnote_846_846" class="fnanchor">[846]</a> And this is what the prophet has to say to -Zedekiah:—</p> - -<p>"And thou, O deadly-wounded wicked one, the -prince of Israel, whose day is come in the time of the -iniquity of the end; thus saith the Lord God, 'Remove -the mitre, and take off the crown. This shall be not -thus. Exalt the low, and abase that which is high. -An overthrow, overthrow, overthrow, will I make it: -this also shall be no more, until He come whose right -it is: and I will give it Him."<a name="FNanchor_847_847" id="FNanchor_847_847"></a><a href="#Footnote_847_847" class="fnanchor">[847]</a></p> - -<p>So (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 587) Jerusalem was delivered over to siege, -even as Ezekiel had sketched upon a tile.<a name="FNanchor_848_848" id="FNanchor_848_848"></a><a href="#Footnote_848_848" class="fnanchor">[848]</a> It was to -be assailed in the old Assyrian manner—as we see it -represented in the British Museum bas-relief, where -Sennacherib is portrayed in the act of besieging -Lachish—with forts, mounds, and battering-rams; and -Ezekiel had also been bidden to put up an iron plate -between him and his pictured city, to represent the -mantelet from behind which the archers shot.</p> - -<p>In this dread crisis Zedekiah sent Zephaniah, the son -of Maaseiah, the priest, and Jehucal, to Jeremiah, entreating -his prayers for the city,<a name="FNanchor_849_849" id="FNanchor_849_849"></a><a href="#Footnote_849_849" class="fnanchor">[849]</a> for he had not yet -been put in prison. Doubtless he prayed, and at first -it looked as if deliverance would come. Pharaoh -Hophrah put in motion the Egyptian army with its -Carian mercenaries and Soudanese negroes, and Nebuchadrezzar -was sufficiently alarmed to raise the siege -and go to meet the Egyptians. The hopes of the -people probably rose high, though multitudes seized<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_448" id="Page_448">[Pg 448]</a></span> -the opportunity to fly to the mountains.<a name="FNanchor_850_850" id="FNanchor_850_850"></a><a href="#Footnote_850_850" class="fnanchor">[850]</a> The circumstances -closely resembled those under which -Sennacherib had raised the siege of Jerusalem to go -to meet Tirhakah the Ethiopian; and perhaps there -were some, and the king among them, who looked that -such a wonder might be vouchsafed to him through -the prayers of Jeremiah as had been vouchsafed to -Hezekiah through the prayers of Isaiah. Not for a -moment did Jeremiah encourage these vain hopes. To -Zephaniah, as to an earlier deputation from the king, -when he sent Pashur with him to inquire of the -prophet, Jeremiah returned a remorseless answer. It -is too late. Pharaoh shall be defeated; even if the -Chaldan army were smitten, its wounded soldiers -would suffice to besiege and burn Jerusalem, and take -into captivity the miserable inhabitants after they had -suffered the worst horrors of a besieged city.<a name="FNanchor_851_851" id="FNanchor_851_851"></a><a href="#Footnote_851_851" class="fnanchor">[851]</a></p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_449" id="Page_449">[Pg 449]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXVII" id="CHAPTER_XXXVII">CHAPTER XXXVII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>JEREMIAH AND HIS PROPHECIES</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">Jer.</span> i. 1-v. 31</h4> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Count me o'er earth's chosen heroes—they were souls that stood alone,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">While the men they agonised for hurled the contumelious stone;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Stood serene, and down the future saw the golden beam incline<br /></span> -<span class="i1">To the side of perfect justice, mastered by their faith divine,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">By one man's plain truth to manhood and to God's supreme design."<br /></span> -<span class="i46"><span class="smcap">Lowell.</span><br /></span> -</div></div> - - -<p>Truly Jeremiah was a prophet of evil. The king -might have addressed him in the words with -which Agamemnon reproaches Kalchas.<a name="FNanchor_852_852" id="FNanchor_852_852"></a><a href="#Footnote_852_852" class="fnanchor">[852]</a></p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Augur accursed! denouncing mischief still:<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Prophet of plagues, for ever boding ill!<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Still must that tongue some wounding message bring,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">And still thy priestly pride provoke thy king."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>Never was there a sadder man.<a name="FNanchor_853_853" id="FNanchor_853_853"></a><a href="#Footnote_853_853" class="fnanchor">[853]</a> Like Phocion, he -believed in the enemies of his country more than he -believed in his own people. He saw "Too late" -written upon everything. He saw himself all but universally -execrated as a coward, as a traitor, as one who -weakened the nerves and damped the courage of those<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_450" id="Page_450">[Pg 450]</a></span> -who were fighting against fearful odds for their wives -and children, the ashes of their fathers, their altars, -and their hearths. It had become his fixed conviction -that any prophets—and there were a multitude of -them—who prophesied peace were false prophets, and -<i>ipso facto</i> proved themselves conspirators against the -true well-being of the land.<a name="FNanchor_854_854" id="FNanchor_854_854"></a><a href="#Footnote_854_854" class="fnanchor">[854]</a> In point of fact, Jeremiah -lived to witness the death-struggle of the idea of -religion in its predominantly national character (vii. -8-16, vi. 8). "The continuity of the national faith -refused to be bound up with the continuance of the -nation. When the nation is dissolved into individual -elements, the continuity and ultimate victory of the -true faith depends on the relations of Jehovah to -individual souls out of which the nation shall be -bound up."<a name="FNanchor_855_855" id="FNanchor_855_855"></a><a href="#Footnote_855_855" class="fnanchor">[855]</a></p> - -<p>And now a sad misfortune happened to Jeremiah. -His home was not at Jerusalem, but at Anathoth, -though he had long been driven from his native village -by the murderous plots of his own kindred, and of those -who had been infuriated by his incessant prophecies of -doom. When the Chaldans retired from Jerusalem -to encounter Pharaoh, he left the distressed city for the -land of Benjamin, "to receive his portion from thence in -the midst of the people"—apparently, for the sense is -doubtful, to claim his dues of maintenance as a priest. -But at the city gate he was arrested by Irijah, the son -of Shelemiah, the captain of the watch, who charged -him with the intention of deserting to the Chaldans. -Jeremiah pronounced the charge to be a lie; but Irijah -took him before the princes, who hated him, and consigned -him to dreary and dangerous imprisonment in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_451" id="Page_451">[Pg 451]</a></span> -the house of Jonathan the scribe. In the vaults of -this "house of the pit" he continued many days.<a name="FNanchor_856_856" id="FNanchor_856_856"></a><a href="#Footnote_856_856" class="fnanchor">[856]</a> The -king sympathised with him: he would gladly have -delivered him, if he could, from the rage of the princes; -but he did not dare.<a name="FNanchor_857_857" id="FNanchor_857_857"></a><a href="#Footnote_857_857" class="fnanchor">[857]</a></p> - -<p>Meanwhile, the siege went on, and the people never -forgot the anguish of despair with which they waited -the reinvestiture of the city. Ever since that day it -has been kept as a fast—the fast of Tebeth. Zedekiah, -yearning for some advice, or comfort—if comfort were -to be had—from the only man whom he really trusted, -sent for Jeremiah to the palace, and asked him in -despicable secrecy, "Is there any word from the Lord?" -The answer was the old one: "Yes! Thou shalt be -delivered into the hands of the King of Babylon." -Jeremiah gave it without quailing, but seized the opportunity -to ask on what plea he was imprisoned. Was -he not a prophet? Had he not prophesied the return -of the Chaldan host? Where now were all the -prophets who had prophesied peace? Would not the -king at least save him from the detestable prison in -which he was dying by inches?</p> - -<p>The king heard his petition, and he was removed to -a better prison in the court of the watch, where he -received his daily piece of bread out of the bakers' -street until all the bread in the city was spent.</p> - -<p>For now utter famine came upon the wretched Jews, -to add to the horrors and accidents of the siege. If<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_452" id="Page_452">[Pg 452]</a></span> -we would know what that famine was in its appalling -intensity, we must turn to the Book of Lamentations. -Those elegies, so unutterably plaintive, may not be by -the prophet himself, but only by his school; but they -show us what was the frightful condition of the people -of Jerusalem before and during the last six months of -the siege. "The sword of the wilderness"—the roving -and plundering Bedouin—made it impossible to get out -of the city in any direction. Things were as dreadfully -hopeless as they had been in Samaria when it was -besieged by Benhadad.<a name="FNanchor_858_858" id="FNanchor_858_858"></a><a href="#Footnote_858_858" class="fnanchor">[858]</a> Hunger and thirst reduce -human nature to its most animal conditions. They -obliterate the merest elements of morality. They make -men like beasts, and reveal the ferocity which is never -quite dead in any but the purest and loftiest souls. -They arouse the least human instincts of the aboriginal -animal. The day came when there was no more bread -left in Jerusalem.<a name="FNanchor_859_859" id="FNanchor_859_859"></a><a href="#Footnote_859_859" class="fnanchor">[859]</a> The fair and ruddy Nazarites, who -had been purer than snow, whiter than milk, more -ruddy than corals, lovely as sapphires, became like -withered boughs,<a name="FNanchor_860_860" id="FNanchor_860_860"></a><a href="#Footnote_860_860" class="fnanchor">[860]</a> and even their friends did not recognise -them in those ghastly and emaciated figures which -crept about the streets. The daughters of Zion, more -cruel in their hunger than the very jackals, lost the -instincts of pity and motherhood. Mothers and fathers -devoured their own little unweaned children.<a name="FNanchor_861_861" id="FNanchor_861_861"></a><a href="#Footnote_861_861" class="fnanchor">[861]</a> There -was parricide as well as infanticide in the horrible -houses. They seemed to plead that none could blame -them, since the lives of many had become an intolerable -anguish, and no man had bread for his little ones, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_453" id="Page_453">[Pg 453]</a></span> -their tongues cleaved to the roof of their mouth. All -that happened six centuries later, during the siege of -Jerusalem by Titus, happened now. Then Martha -the daughter of Nicodemus ben-Gorion, once a lady of -enormous wealth, was seen picking the grains of corn -from the offal of the streets; now the women who had -fed delicately and been brought up in scarlet were seen -sitting desolate on heaps of dung.<a name="FNanchor_862_862" id="FNanchor_862_862"></a><a href="#Footnote_862_862" class="fnanchor">[862]</a> And Jehovah did -not raise His hand to save His guilty and dying people. -It was too late!</p> - -<p>And as is always the case in such extremities, there -were men who stood defiant and selfish amid the -universal misery. Murder, oppression, and luxury continued -to prevail. The godless nobles did not intermit -the building of their luxurious houses, asserting to -themselves and others that, after all, the final catastrophe -was not near at hand. The sudden death of one -of them—Pelatiah, the son of Benaiah—while Ezekiel -was prophesying, terrified the prophet so much that he -flung himself on his face and cried with a loud voice, -"Ah, Lord God! wilt Thou make a full end of the -remnant of Israel?" But on the others this death -by the visitation of God seems to have produced no -effect; and the glory of God left the city, borne away -upon its cherubim-chariot.<a name="FNanchor_863_863" id="FNanchor_863_863"></a><a href="#Footnote_863_863" class="fnanchor">[863]</a></p> - -<p>Even under the stress of these dreadful circumstances -the Jews held out with that desperate tenacity -which has often been shown by nations fighting behind -strong walls for their very existence, but by no nation -more decidedly than by the Jews. And if the rebel-party, -and the lying prophets who had brought the -city to this pass, still entertained any hopes either of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_454" id="Page_454">[Pg 454]</a></span> -a diversion caused by Pharaoh Hophrah, or of some -miraculous deliverance such as that which had saved -the city from Sennacherib years earlier, it is not -unnatural that they should have regarded Jeremiah -with positive fury. For he still continued to prophesy -the captivity. What specially angered them was his -message to the people that all who remained in Jerusalem -should die by the sword, the famine, and the -pestilence, but that those who deserted to the Chaldans -should live. It was on the ground of his having said -this that they had imprisoned him as a deserter; and -when Pashur and his son Gedaliah heard that he was -still saying this, they and the other princes entreated -Zedekiah to put him to death as a pernicious traitor, -who weakened the hands of the patriot soldiers. -Jeremiah was not guilty of the lack of patriotism with -which they charged him. The day of independence -had passed for ever, and Babylon, not Egypt, was the -appointed suzerain. The counselling of submission—as -many a victorious chieftain has been forced at -last to counsel it, from the days of Hannibal to those -of Thiers—is often the true and the only possible -patriotism in doomed and decadent nations. Zedekiah -timidly abandoned the prophet to the rage of his -enemies; but being afraid to murder him openly as -Urijah had been murdered, they flung him into a well -in the dungeon of Malchiah, the king's son. Into the -mire of this pit he sank up to the arms, and there they -purposely left him to starve and rot.<a name="FNanchor_864_864" id="FNanchor_864_864"></a><a href="#Footnote_864_864" class="fnanchor">[864]</a> But if no Israelite -pitied him, his condition moved the compassion of -Ebed-Melech, an Ethiopian, one of the king's eunuch-chamberlains. -He hurried to the king in a storm of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_455" id="Page_455">[Pg 455]</a></span> -pity and indignation. He found him sitting, as a king -should do, at the post of danger in the gate of Benjamin; -for Zedekiah was not a physical, though he was a moral, -coward. Ebed-Melech told the king that Jeremiah was -dying of starvation, and Zedekiah bade him take three<a name="FNanchor_865_865" id="FNanchor_865_865"></a><a href="#Footnote_865_865" class="fnanchor">[865]</a> -men with him and rescue the dying man. The faithful -Ethiopian hurried to a cellar under the treasury, took -with him some old, worn fragments of robes, and, letting -them down by cords, called to Jeremiah to put them -under his arm-pits. He did so, and they drew him -up into the light of day, though he still remained in -prison.</p> - -<p>It seems to have been at this time that, in spite of -his grim vaticination of immediate retribution, Jeremiah -showed his serene confidence in the ultimate future -by accepting the proposal of his cousin Hanameel to -buy some of the paternal fields at Anathoth, though at -that very moment they were in the hands of the Chaldans. -Such an act publicly performed must have -caused some consolation to the besieged, just as did -the courage of the Roman senator who gave a good -price for the estate outside the walls of Rome on which -Hannibal was actually encamped.</p> - -<p>Then Zedekiah once more secretly sent for him, and -implored him to tell the unvarnished truth. "If I do," -said the prophet, "will you not kill me? and will you -in any case hearken to me?" Zedekiah swore not to -betray him to his enemies; and Jeremiah told him that, -even at that eleventh hour, if he would go out and make -submission to the Babylonians, the city should not be -burnt, and he should save the lives of himself and of -his family. Zedekiah believed him, but pleaded that<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_456" id="Page_456">[Pg 456]</a></span> -he was afraid of the mockery of the deserters to whom -he might be delivered. Jeremiah assured him that he -should not be so delivered, and that, if he refused to -obey, nothing remained for the city, and for him and -his wives and children, but final ruin. The king was -too weak to follow what he must now have felt to be -the last chance which God had opened out for him. -He could only "attain to half-believe." He entrusted -the result to chance, with miserable vacillation of purpose; -and the door of hope was closed upon him. His -one desire was to conceal the interview; and if it came -to the ears of the princes—of whom he was shamefully -afraid—he begged Jeremiah to say that he had only -entreated the king not to send him back to die in -Jonathan's prison.</p> - -<p>As he had suspected, it became known that Jeremiah -had been summoned to an interview with the king. -They questioned the prophet in prison. He told them -the story which the king had suggested to him, and the -truth remained undiscovered. For this deflection from -exact truth it is tolerably certain that, in the state of -men's consciences upon the subject of veracity in those -days, the prophet's moral sense did not for a moment -reproach him. He remained in his prison, guarded -probably by the faithful Ebed-Melech, until Jerusalem -was taken.</p> - -<p>Let us pity the dreadful plight of Zedekiah, aggravated -as it was by his weak temperament. "He -stands at the head of a people determined to defend -itself, but is himself without either hope or courage."<a name="FNanchor_866_866" id="FNanchor_866_866"></a><a href="#Footnote_866_866" class="fnanchor">[866]</a></p> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_457" id="Page_457">[Pg 457]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXVIII" id="CHAPTER_XXXVIII">CHAPTER XXXVIII</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE FALL OF JERUSALEM</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 586</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xxv. 1-21</h4> - -<blockquote> - -<p>"In that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all -nations."—<span class="smcap">Zech.</span> xii. 3.</p> - -<p>"An end is come, the end is come; it awaketh against thee: behold -the end is come."—<span class="smcap">Ezek.</span> vii. 6.</p></blockquote> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i8">"Behold yon sterile spot<br /></span> -<span class="i4">Where now the wandering Arab's tent<br /></span> -<span class="i8">Flaps in the desert blast;<br /></span> -<span class="i4">There once old Salem's haughty fane<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Reared high to heaven its thousand golden domes,<br /></span> -<span class="i4">And in the blushing face of day<br /></span> -<span class="i6">Exposed its shameful glory."<br /></span> -<span class="i30"><span class="smcap">Shelley.</span><br /></span> -</div></div> - - -<p>After the siege had lasted for a year and a half, -all but one day, at midnight the besiegers made -a breach in the northern city wall.<a name="FNanchor_867_867" id="FNanchor_867_867"></a><a href="#Footnote_867_867" class="fnanchor">[867]</a> It was a day of -terrible remembrance, and throughout the exile it was -observed as a solemn fast.<a name="FNanchor_868_868" id="FNanchor_868_868"></a><a href="#Footnote_868_868" class="fnanchor">[868]</a></p> - -<p>Nebuchadrezzar was no longer in person before the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_458" id="Page_458">[Pg 458]</a></span> -walls. He had other war-like operations and other -sieges on hand—the sieges of Tyre, Asekah, and -Lachish—as well as Jerusalem. He had therefore -established his headquarters at Lachish, and did not -superintend the final operations against the city.<a name="FNanchor_869_869" id="FNanchor_869_869"></a><a href="#Footnote_869_869" class="fnanchor">[869]</a> But -now that all had become practically hopeless, and the capture -of the rest of Jerusalem was only a matter of a few -days more, Zedekiah and his few best surviving princes -and soldiers fled by night through the opposite quarter -of the city. There was a little unwatched postern -between two walls near the king's garden, and through -this he and his escort fled, hoping to reach the Arabah, -and make good his escape, perhaps to the Wady-el-Arish, -which he could reach in five hours, through the -wilds beyond the Jordan.<a name="FNanchor_870_870" id="FNanchor_870_870"></a><a href="#Footnote_870_870" class="fnanchor">[870]</a> The heads of the king and -his followers were muffled, and they carried on their -shoulders their choicest possessions.<a name="FNanchor_871_871" id="FNanchor_871_871"></a><a href="#Footnote_871_871" class="fnanchor">[871]</a> But he was -betrayed by some of the mean deserters,<a name="FNanchor_872_872" id="FNanchor_872_872"></a><a href="#Footnote_872_872" class="fnanchor">[872]</a> and pursued -by the Chaldans. His movements were doubtless -impeded by the presence of his harem and his children. -His little band of warriors could offer no resistance, and -fled in all directions. Zedekiah, his family, and -attendants were taken prisoners, and carried to Riblah<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_459" id="Page_459">[Pg 459]</a></span> -to appear before the mighty conqueror.<a name="FNanchor_873_873" id="FNanchor_873_873"></a><a href="#Footnote_873_873" class="fnanchor">[873]</a> Nebuchadrezzar -showed no pity towards one whom he had -elevated to the throne, and who had violated his most -solemn assurances by intriguing with his enemies. -He brought him to trial, and doomed him to witness -with his own eyes the massacre of his two sons and -of his attendants. After he had endured this anguish, -worse than death, his eyes were put out, and, bound -in double fetters,<a name="FNanchor_874_874" id="FNanchor_874_874"></a><a href="#Footnote_874_874" class="fnanchor">[874]</a> he was sent to Babylon, where he -ended his miserable days. To blind a king deprived -him of all hope of recovering the throne, and was -therefore in ancient days a common punishment.<a name="FNanchor_875_875" id="FNanchor_875_875"></a><a href="#Footnote_875_875" class="fnanchor">[875]</a> -The LXX. adds that he was sent by the Babylonians -to grind a mill—εἰς οἰκίον μυλῶνος. This is probably -a reminiscence of the blinded Samson. But thus were -fulfilled with startling literalness two prophecies which -might well have seemed to be contradictory.<a name="FNanchor_876_876" id="FNanchor_876_876"></a><a href="#Footnote_876_876" class="fnanchor">[876]</a> For -Jeremiah had said (xxxiv. 3),—</p> - -<p>"Thine eyes shall behold the eyes of the King of -Babylon, and he shall speak with thee mouth to mouth, -and thou shalt go to Babylon."</p> - -<p>Whereas Ezekiel had said (xii. 13),—</p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_460" id="Page_460">[Pg 460]</a></span></p> - -<p>"I will bring him to Babylon, the land of the -Chaldans; yet shall he not see it, though he shall -die there."</p> - -<p>Henceforth Zedekiah was forgotten, and his place -knew him no more. We can only hope that in his -blindness and solitude he was happier than he had been -on the throne of Judah, and that before death came to -end his miseries he found peace with God.</p> - -<p>The conqueror did not come to spoil the city. He -left that task to three great officers,—Nebuzaradan, the -captain of the guard, or chief executioner;<a name="FNanchor_877_877" id="FNanchor_877_877"></a><a href="#Footnote_877_877" class="fnanchor">[877]</a> Nebushasban, -the Rabsaris, or chief of the eunuchs; and Nergalshareser, -the Rabmag, or chief of the magicians. -They took their station by the Middle Gate, and first -gave up the city to pillage and massacre. No horror -was spared.<a name="FNanchor_878_878" id="FNanchor_878_878"></a><a href="#Footnote_878_878" class="fnanchor">[878]</a> The sepulchres were rifled for treasure; -the young Levites were slain in the house of their -Sanctuary; women were violated; maidens and hoary-headed -men were slain. "Princes were hanged up by -the hand, and the faces of elders were dishonoured; -priest and prophet were slain in the Sanctuary of the -Lord,"<a name="FNanchor_879_879" id="FNanchor_879_879"></a><a href="#Footnote_879_879" class="fnanchor">[879]</a> till the blood flowed like red wine from the -winepress over the desecrated floor.<a name="FNanchor_880_880" id="FNanchor_880_880"></a><a href="#Footnote_880_880" class="fnanchor">[880]</a> The guilty city<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_461" id="Page_461">[Pg 461]</a></span> -drank at the hand of God the dregs of the cup of His -fury.<a name="FNanchor_881_881" id="FNanchor_881_881"></a><a href="#Footnote_881_881" class="fnanchor">[881]</a> It was the final vengeance. "The punishment -of thine iniquity is accomplished, O daughter of Zion. -He will no more carry thee away into captivity."<a name="FNanchor_882_882" id="FNanchor_882_882"></a><a href="#Footnote_882_882" class="fnanchor">[882]</a> -And, meanwhile, the little Bedouin principalities were -full of savage exultation at the fate of their hereditary -foe.<a name="FNanchor_883_883" id="FNanchor_883_883"></a><a href="#Footnote_883_883" class="fnanchor">[883]</a> This was felt by the Jews as a culmination of their -misery, that they became a derision to their enemies. -The callous insults hurled at them by the neighbouring -tribes in their hour of shame awoke that implacable -wrath against Gebal and Ammon and Amalek -which finds its echo in the Prophets and in the -Psalms.<a name="FNanchor_884_884" id="FNanchor_884_884"></a><a href="#Footnote_884_884" class="fnanchor">[884]</a></p> - -<p>After this the devoted capital was given up to -destruction. The Temple was plundered. All that -remained of its often-rifled splendours was carried -away, such as the ancient pillars Jachin and Boaz, the -masterpieces of Hiram's art, the caldron, the brazen -sea, and all the vessels of gold, of silver, and of brass. -Then the walls of the city were dismantled and broken -down. The Temple, and the palace, and all the houses -of the princes were committed to the flames. As for -the principal remaining inhabitants, Seraiah the chief -priest, perhaps the grandson of Hilkiah and the grandfather -of Ezra, Zephaniah the second priest, the three -Levitic doorkeepers, the secretary of war, five of the -greatest nobles who "saw the king's face,"<a name="FNanchor_885_885" id="FNanchor_885_885"></a><a href="#Footnote_885_885" class="fnanchor">[885]</a> and sixty -of the common people who had been marked out for -special punishment, were taken to Riblah, and there<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_462" id="Page_462">[Pg 462]</a></span> -massacred by order of Nebuchadrezzar.<a name="FNanchor_886_886" id="FNanchor_886_886"></a><a href="#Footnote_886_886" class="fnanchor">[886]</a> With these -Nebuchadrezzar took away as his prisoners a multitude -of the wealthier inhabitants, leaving behind him but -the humblest artisans. As the craftsmen and smiths -had been deported,<a name="FNanchor_887_887" id="FNanchor_887_887"></a><a href="#Footnote_887_887" class="fnanchor">[887]</a> these poor people busied themselves -in agriculture, as vine-dressers and husbandmen. The -existing estates were divided among them; and being -few in number, they found the amplest sustenance in -treasures of wheat and barley, and oil and honey, and -summer fruits, which they kept concealed for safety, -as the fellaheen of Palestine do to this day.<a name="FNanchor_888_888" id="FNanchor_888_888"></a><a href="#Footnote_888_888" class="fnanchor">[888]</a></p> - -<p>According to the historic chapters added to the -prophecies of Jeremiah, the whole number of captives -carried away from Jerusalem by Nebuchadrezzar in -the seventh, the eighteenth, and the twenty-third years -of his reign were 4,600.<a name="FNanchor_889_889" id="FNanchor_889_889"></a><a href="#Footnote_889_889" class="fnanchor">[889]</a> The completeness of the -desolation might well have caused the heart-rending -outcry of Psalm lxxix.: "O God, the heathen are -come into Thine inheritance; Thy holy Temple have -they defiled; they have made Jerusalem a heap of -stones. The dead bodies of Thy servants have they -given to be meat unto the fowls of heaven, and the -flesh of Thy saints unto the beasts of the land. Their -blood have they shed like water round about Jerusalem; -and there was no man to bury them."</p> - -<p>Among the remnant of the people was Jeremiah. -Nebuzaradan had received from his king the strictest<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_463" id="Page_463">[Pg 463]</a></span> -injunctions to treat him honourably; for he had heard -from the deserters that he had always opposed the -rebellion, and had prophesied the issue of the siege. -He was indeed sent in manacles to Ramah;<a name="FNanchor_890_890" id="FNanchor_890_890"></a><a href="#Footnote_890_890" class="fnanchor">[890]</a> but there -Nebuchadrezzar gave him free choice to do exactly as -he liked—either to accompany him to Babylon, where -he should be well treated and cared for, or to return to -Jerusalem, and live where he liked. This was his desire. -Nebuchadrezzar therefore dismissed him with food and -a present;<a name="FNanchor_891_891" id="FNanchor_891_891"></a><a href="#Footnote_891_891" class="fnanchor">[891]</a> and he returned. The LXX. and Vulgate -represent him as sitting weeping over the ruins of -Jerusalem, and tradition says that he sought for his -lamentations a cave still existing near the Damascus -Gate. Of this Scripture knows nothing. But the -melancholy prophet was only reserved for further -tragedies. He had lived one of the most afflicted of -human lives. A man of tender heart and shrinking -disposition, he had been called to set his face like a flint -against kings, and nobles, and mobs. Worse than this, -being himself a prophet and priest, naturally led to -sympathise with both, he was the doomed antagonist -of both—victim of "one of the strongest of human -passions, the hatred of priests against a priest who -attacks his own order, the hatred of prophets against -a prophet who ventures to have a voice and a will of his -own." Even his own family had plotted against his -life at humble Anathoth;<a name="FNanchor_892_892" id="FNanchor_892_892"></a><a href="#Footnote_892_892" class="fnanchor">[892]</a> and when he retreated to -Jerusalem, he found himself at the centre of the storm.<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_464" id="Page_464">[Pg 464]</a></span> -Now perhaps he hoped for a gleam of sunset peace. -But his hopes were disappointed. He had to tread the -path of anguish and hatred to the bitter end, as he had -trodden it for nearly fifty years of the troubled life -which had followed his call in early boyhood.</p> - -<p>"But, in the case of Jerusalem," says Dean Stanley, -"both its first and second destruction have the peculiar -interest of involving the dissolution of a religious dispensation, -combined with the agony of an expiring -nation, such as no other people has survived, and, by -surviving, carried on the living recollection, first of one, -and then of the other, for centuries after the first shock -was over."<a name="FNanchor_893_893" id="FNanchor_893_893"></a><a href="#Footnote_893_893" class="fnanchor">[893]</a></p> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_465" id="Page_465">[Pg 465]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2><a name="CHAPTER_XXXIX" id="CHAPTER_XXXIX">CHAPTER XXXIX</a></h2> - -<h3><i>GEDALIAH</i></h3> - -<h4><span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 586</h4> - -<h4>2 <span class="smcap">Kings</span> xxv. 22-30</h4> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Vedi che son un che piango."—<span class="smcap">Dante</span>, <i>Inferno</i>.<br /></span> -</div><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"No, rather steel thy melting heart<br /></span> -<span class="i1">To act the martyr's sternest part,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">To watch with firm, unshrinking eye<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Thy darling visions as they die,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Till all bright hopes and hues of day<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Have faded into twilight grey."<br /></span> -<span class="i31"><span class="smcap">Keble.</span><br /></span> -</div></div> - - -<p>In deciding that he would not accompany Nebuchadrezzar -to Babylon, Jeremiah made the choice of -duty. In Chalda he would have lived at ease, in plenty, -in security, amid universal respect. He might have -helped his younger contemporary Ezekiel in his struggle -to keep the exiles in Babylon faithful to their duty and -their God. He regarded the exiles as representing all -that was best and noblest in the nation; and he would -have been safe and honoured in the midst of them, -under the immediate protection of the great Babylonian -king. On the other hand, to return to Juda was to -return to a defenceless and a distracted people, the -mere dregs of the true nation, the mere phantom of -what they once had been. Surely his life had earned -the blessing of repose? But no! The hopes of the<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_466" id="Page_466">[Pg 466]</a></span> -Chosen People, the seed of Abraham, God's servant, -could not be dissevered from the Holy Land. Rest -was not for him on this side of the grave. His only -prayer must be, like that which Senancour had inscribed -over his grave, "ternit, deviens mon asile!" The -decision cost him a terrible struggle; but duty called -him, and he obeyed. It has been supposed by some -critics<a name="FNanchor_894_894" id="FNanchor_894_894"></a><a href="#Footnote_894_894" class="fnanchor">[894]</a> that the wild cry of Jer. xv. 10-21 expresses -his anguish at the necessity of casting in his lot with -the remnant; the sense that they needed his protecting -influence and prophetic guidance; and the promise of -God that his sacrifice should not be ineffectual for good -to the miserable fragment of his nation, even though -they should continue to struggle against him.</p> - -<p>So with breaking heart he saw Nebuzaradan at -Ramah marshalling the throng of captives for their -long journey to the waters of Babylon. Before them, -and before the little band which returned with him to -the burnt Temple, the dismantled city, the desolate -house, there lay an unknown future; but in spite of -the exiles' doom it looked brighter for them than for -him, as with tears and sobs they parted from each -other. Then it was that—</p> - -<p>"A voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, and -bitter weeping; Rachel weeping for her children refuseth -to be comforted, because they are not. Thus saith the -Lord, 'Refrain thy voice from weeping, and thine eyes -from tears: for thy work shall be rewarded,' saith the -Lord; 'and they shall come again from the land of -the enemy. And there is hope for thy time to come,' -saith the Lord, 'that thy children shall come again to -their own border.'"<a name="FNanchor_895_895" id="FNanchor_895_895"></a><a href="#Footnote_895_895" class="fnanchor">[895]</a></p> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_467" id="Page_467">[Pg 467]</a></span></p> - -<p>Disappointed in the fidelity of the royal house of -Judah, Nebuchadrezzar had not attempted to place -another of them on the throne. He appointed Gedaliah, -the son of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan, his satrap -(<i>pakd</i>) over the poor remnant who were left in the -land. In this appointment we probably trace the influence -of Jeremiah. There is no one whom Nebuchadrezzar -would have been so likely to consult. -Gedaliah was the son of the prophet's old protector,<a name="FNanchor_896_896" id="FNanchor_896_896"></a><a href="#Footnote_896_896" class="fnanchor">[896]</a> -and his grandfather Shaphan had been a trusted minister -of Josiah. He thoroughly justified the confidence reposed -in him, and under his wise and prosperous rule -there seemed to be every prospect that there would -be at least some pale gleam of returning prosperity. -The Jews, who during the period of the siege had fled -into all the neighbouring countries, no sooner heard -of his viceroyalty than they came flocking back from -Moab, and Ammon, and Edom. They found themselves, -perhaps for the first time in their lives, in -possession of large estates, from which the exiles of -Babylon had been dispossessed; and favoured by an -abundant harvest, "they gathered wine and summer -fruits very much."<a name="FNanchor_897_897" id="FNanchor_897_897"></a><a href="#Footnote_897_897" class="fnanchor">[897]</a></p> - -<p>Jerusalem—dismantled, defenceless, burnt—was no -longer habitable. It was all but deserted, so that -jackals and hynas prowled even over the mountain -of the Lord's House. All attempt to refortify it would -have been regarded as rebellion, and such a mere -"lodge in a garden of cucumbers" would have been useless -to repress the marauding incursions of the envious -Moabites and Edomites, who had looked on with shouts -at the destruction of the city, and exulted when her<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_468" id="Page_468">[Pg 468]</a></span> -carved work was broken down with axes and hammers. -Gedaliah therefore fixed his headquarters at Mizpah, -about six miles north of Jerusalem, of which the lofty -eminence could be easily secured.<a name="FNanchor_898_898" id="FNanchor_898_898"></a><a href="#Footnote_898_898" class="fnanchor">[898]</a> It was the watchtower -from which Titus caught his first glimpses of -the Holy City, as many a traveller does to this day, -and the point at which Richard I. averted his eyes -with tears, saying that he was unworthy to look upon -the city which he was unable to save. Here, then, -Gedaliah lived, urging upon his subjects the policy -which his friend and adviser Jeremiah had always -supported, and promising them quietness and peace -if they would but accept the logic of circumstances—if -they would bow to the inevitable, and frankly -acknowledge the suzerainty of Nebuchadrezzar. It -was perhaps as a pledge of more independence in -better days to come that Nebuzaradan had left Gedaliah -in charge of the young daughters of King Zedekiah, -who had with them some of their eunuch-attendants. -As that unfortunate monarch was only thirty-two years -old when he was blinded and carried away, the -princesses were probably young girls; and it has been -conjectured that it was part of the Chaldan king's -plan for the future that in time Gedaliah should be -permitted to marry one of them, and re-establish at -least a collateral branch of the old royal house of -David.</p> - -<p>How long this respite continued we do not know. -The language of Jeremiah xxxix 2, xli. 1, compared -with 2 Kings xxv. 8, might seem to imply that it only -lasted two months. But since Jeremiah does not -mention the year in xli. 1, and as there seems to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_469" id="Page_469">[Pg 469]</a></span> -have been yet another deportation of Jews by Nebuchadrezzar -five years latter (Jer. lii. 30), which may -have been in revenge for the murder of his satrap, -some have supposed that Gedaliah's rule lasted four -years. All is uncertain, and the latter passage is of -doubtful authenticity; but it is at least possible that the -vengeful atrocity committed by Ishmael followed almost -immediately after the Chaldan forces were well out -of sight. Respecting these last days of Jewish independence, -"History, leaning semisomnous on her pyramid, -muttereth something, but we know not what it is."</p> - -<p>However this may be, there seem to have been -guerilla bands wandering through the country, partly -to get what they could, and partly to watch against -Bedouin marauders. Johanan, the son of Kareah, who -was one of the chief captains among them,<a name="FNanchor_899_899" id="FNanchor_899_899"></a><a href="#Footnote_899_899" class="fnanchor">[899]</a> came with -others to Gedaliah, and warned him that Baalis, King -of Ammon, was intriguing against him, and trying to -induce a certain Ishmael, the son of Nethaniah, the -son of Elishama—who, in some way unknown to us, -represented, perhaps on the female side, the seed -royal<a name="FNanchor_900_900" id="FNanchor_900_900"></a><a href="#Footnote_900_900" class="fnanchor">[900]</a>—to come and murder him. Gedaliah was of -a fine, unsuspicious temperament, and with rash -generosity he refused to believe in the existence of -a plot so ruinous and so useless. Astonished at his -noble incredulity, Johanan then had a secret interview -with him, and offered to murder Ishmael so secretly -that no one should know of it. "Why," he asked, -"should this man be suffered to ruin everything, and<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_470" id="Page_470">[Pg 470]</a></span> -cause the final scattering of even the struggling handful -of colonists at Mizpah and in Judah?" Gedaliah -forbad his intervention. "Thou shalt not do this," he -said: "thou speakest falsely of Ishmael."</p> - -<p>But Johanan's story was only too true. Shortly -afterwards, Ishmael, with ten confederates,<a name="FNanchor_901_901" id="FNanchor_901_901"></a><a href="#Footnote_901_901" class="fnanchor">[901]</a> came to -visit Gedaliah at Mizpah, perhaps on the pretext of -seeing his kinswomen, the daughters of Zedekiah. -Gedaliah welcomed this ambitious villain and his -murderous accomplices with open-handed hospitality. -He invited them all to a banquet in the fort of Mizpah; -and after eating salt with him, Ishmael and his bravoes -first murdered him, and then put promiscuously to the -sword his soldiers, and the Chaldans who had been -left to look after him.<a name="FNanchor_902_902" id="FNanchor_902_902"></a><a href="#Footnote_902_902" class="fnanchor">[902]</a> The gates of the fort were -closed, and the bodies were flung into a deep well or -tank,<a name="FNanchor_903_903" id="FNanchor_903_903"></a><a href="#Footnote_903_903" class="fnanchor">[903]</a> which had been constructed by Asa in the middle -of the courtyard, when he was fortifying Mizpah against -the attacks of Baasha, King of Israel.</p> - -<p>For two days there was an unbroken silence, and -the peasants at Mizpah remained unaware of the -dreadful tragedy. On the third day a sad procession -was seen wending its way up the heights. There were -scattered Jews in Shiloh and Samaria who still remembered -Zion; and eighty pilgrims, weeping as they went, -came with shaven beards and rent garments to bring -a <i>minchah</i> and incense to the ruined shrine at Jerusalem. -In the depth of their woe they had even violated a law -(Lev. xix. 28, xxi. 5), of which they were perhaps<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_471" id="Page_471">[Pg 471]</a></span> -unaware, by cutting themselves in sign of their misery. -Mizpah would be their last halting-place on the way to -Jerusalem; and the hypocrite Ishmael came out to them -with an invitation to share the hospitality of the murdered -satrap. No sooner had the gate of the charnel-house -closed upon them,<a name="FNanchor_904_904" id="FNanchor_904_904"></a><a href="#Footnote_904_904" class="fnanchor">[904]</a> than Ishmael and his ten -ruffians began to murder this unoffending company. -Crimes more aimless and more brutal than those committed -by this infinitely degenerate scion of the royal -house it is impossible to conceive. The place swam -with blood. The story "reads almost like a page from -the annals of the Indian Mutiny." Seventy of the -wretched pilgrims had been butchered and flung into -the tank, which must have been choked with corpses, -like the fatal well at Cawnpore,<a name="FNanchor_905_905" id="FNanchor_905_905"></a><a href="#Footnote_905_905" class="fnanchor">[905]</a> when the ten survivors -pleaded for their lives by telling Ishmael that they had -large treasures of country produce stored in hidden -places, which should be at his disposal if he would -spare them.<a name="FNanchor_906_906" id="FNanchor_906_906"></a><a href="#Footnote_906_906" class="fnanchor">[906]</a></p> - -<p>As it was useless to make any further attempt to -conceal his atrocities, Ishmael now took the young -princesses and the inhabitants of Mizpah with him, -and tried to make good his escape to his patron the -King of Ammon. But the watchful eye of Johanan, -the son of Kareah, had been upon him, and assembling -his band he went in swift pursuit. Ishmael had got -no farther than the Pool of Gibeon, when Johanan<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_472" id="Page_472">[Pg 472]</a></span> -overtook him, to the intense joy of the prisoners. A -scuffle ensued; but Ishmael and eight of his blood-stained -desperadoes unhappily managed to make good -their escape to the Ammonites. The wretch vanishes -into the darkness, and we hear of him no more.</p> - -<p>Even now the circumstances were desperate. Nebuchadrezzar -could not in honour overlook the frustration -of all his plans, and the murder, not only of his viceroy, -but even of his Chaldan commissioners. He would -not be likely to accept any excuses. No course seemed -open but that of flight. There was no temptation to -return to Mizpah with its frightful memories and its -corpse-choked tank. From Gibeon the survivors made -their way to Bethlehem, which lay on the road to -Egypt, and where they could be sheltered in the -caravanserai of Chimham. Many Jews had already -taken refuge in Egypt. Colonies of them were living -in Pathros, and at Migdol and Noph, under the kindly -protection of Pharaoh Hophrah. Would it not be well -to join them?</p> - -<p>In utter perplexity Johanan and the other captains -and all the people came to Jeremiah. How he had -escaped the massacre at Mizpah we do not know; but -now he seemed to be the only man left in whose prophetic -guidance they could confide. They entreated -him with pathetic earnestness to show them the will -of Jehovah; and he promised to pray for insight, while -they pledged themselves to obey implicitly his directions.</p> - -<p>The anguish and vacillation of the prophet's mind is -shown by the fact that for ten whole days no light -came to him. It seemed as if Judah was under an -irrevocable curse. Whither could they return? What -temptation was there to return? Did not return mean<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_473" id="Page_473">[Pg 473]</a></span> -fresh intolerable miseries? Would they not be torn -to pieces by the robber bands from across the Jordan? -And what could be the end of it but another deportation -to Babylon, with perhaps further massacre and -starvation?</p> - -<p>All the arguments seemed against this course; and -he could see very clearly that it would be against all -the wishes of the down-trodden fugitives who longed -for Egypt, "where we shall see no war, nor hear the -sound of the trumpet, nor have hunger of bread."</p> - -<p>Yet Jeremiah could only give them the message -which he believed to represent the will of God. He -bade them return. He assured them that they need -have no fear of the King of Babylon, and that God -would bless them; whereas if they went to Egypt, they -would die by the sword, the famine, and the pestilence. -At the same time—doomed always to thwart the hopes -of the multitude—he reproved the hypocrisy which had -sent them to ask God's will when they never intended -to do anything but follow their own.</p> - -<p>Then their anger broke out against him. He was, -as always, the prophet of evil, and they held him more -than half responsible for being the <i>cause</i> of the ruin -which he invariably predicted. Johanan and "all the -proud men" (<i>zēdim</i>) gave him the lie. They told him -that the source of his prophesy was not Jehovah, but -the meddling and pernicious Baruch. Perhaps some -of them may have remembered the words of Isaiah, -that a day should come when five cities, of which one -should be called Kir-Cheres ("the City of Destruction")—a -play on the name Kir-Heres, "the City of the Sun," -On or Heliopolis should—speak the language of Canaan -and swear by the Lord of hosts, and there should be -an altar in the land of Egypt and a <i>matstsebah</i> at its<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_474" id="Page_474">[Pg 474]</a></span> -border in witness to Jehovah, and that though Egypt -should be smitten she should also be healed.<a name="FNanchor_907_907" id="FNanchor_907_907"></a><a href="#Footnote_907_907" class="fnanchor">[907]</a></p> - -<p>So they settled to go to Egypt; and taking with them -Jeremiah, and Baruch, and the king's daughters, and -all the remnant, they made their way to Tahpanhes or -Daphne,<a name="FNanchor_908_908" id="FNanchor_908_908"></a><a href="#Footnote_908_908" class="fnanchor">[908]</a> an advanced post to guard the road to Syria. -Mr. Flinders Petrie in 1886 discovered the site of the -city at Tel Defenneh, and the ruins of the very palace -which Pharaoh Hophrah placed at the disposal of the -daughters of his ally Zedekiah. It is still known by -the name of "The Castle of the Jew's Daughters"—<i>El -Kasr el Bint el Jehudi</i>.<a name="FNanchor_909_909" id="FNanchor_909_909"></a><a href="#Footnote_909_909" class="fnanchor">[909]</a></p> - -<p>In front of this palace was an elevated platform -(<i>mastaba</i>) of brick, which still remains. In this brickwork -Jeremiah was bidden by the word of Jehovah to -place great stones, and to declare that on that very platform, -over those very stones, Nebuchadrezzar should -pitch his royal tent, when he came to wrap himself in the -land of Egypt, as a shepherd wraps himself in his garment, -and to burn the pillars of Heliopolis with fire.<a name="FNanchor_910_910" id="FNanchor_910_910"></a><a href="#Footnote_910_910" class="fnanchor">[910]</a></p> - -<p>Jeremiah still had to face stormy times. At some -great festival assembly at Tahpanhes he bitterly reproached -the exiled Jews for their idolatries. He was -extremely indignant with the women who burned incense -to the Queen of Heaven. The multitude, and especially -the women, openly defied him. "We will not hearken<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_475" id="Page_475">[Pg 475]</a></span> -to thee," they said. "We will continue to burn incense, -and offer offerings to the Queen of Heaven, <i>as we have -done, we, and our fathers, our kings, and our princes, in -the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem</i>; for -then had we plenty of victuals, and were well, and saw -no evil. It is only since we have left off making cakes -for her and honouring her that we have suffered hunger -and desolation; and our husbands were always well -aware of our proceedings."</p> - -<p>Never was there a more defiantly ostentatious revolt -against God and against His prophet! Remonstrance -seemed hopeless. What could Jeremiah do but menace -them with the wrath of Heaven, and tell them that in -sign of the truth of his words the fate of Pharaoh -Hophrah should be the same as the fate of Zedekiah, -King of Judah, and should be inflicted by the hand -of Nebuchadrezzar.<a name="FNanchor_911_911" id="FNanchor_911_911"></a><a href="#Footnote_911_911" class="fnanchor">[911]</a></p> - -<p>So on the colony of fugitives the curtain of revelation -rushes down in storm. The prophet went on the -troubled path which, if tradition be true, led him at -last to martyrdom. He is said to have been stoned -by his infuriated fellow-exiles. But his name lived -in the memory of his people. It was he (they believed) -who had hidden from the Chaldans the Ark and the -sacred fire, and some day he should return to reveal -the place of their concealment.<a name="FNanchor_912_912" id="FNanchor_912_912"></a><a href="#Footnote_912_912" class="fnanchor">[912]</a> When Christ asked -His disciples six hundred years later, "Whom say the -people that I am?" one of the answers was, "Some -say Jeremiah or one of the prophets." He became, so<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_476" id="Page_476">[Pg 476]</a></span> -to speak, the guardian saint of the land in which he had -suffered such cruel persecutions.</p> - -<p>But the historian of the Kings does not like to leave -the close of his story in unbroken gloom. He wrote -during the Exile. He has narrated with tears the sad -fate of Jehoiachin; and though he does not care to -dwell on the Exile itself, he is glad to narrate one touch -of kindness on the part of the King of Babylon, which -he doubtless regarded as a pledge of mercies yet to -come. Twenty-six years had elapsed since the capture -of Jerusalem, and thirty-seven since the captivity -of the exiled king, when Evil-Merodach, the son -and successor of Nebuchadrezzar, took pity on the -imprisoned heir of the House of David.<a name="FNanchor_913_913" id="FNanchor_913_913"></a><a href="#Footnote_913_913" class="fnanchor">[913]</a> He took -Jehoiachin from his dungeon, changed his garments, -spoke words of encouragement to him, gave him a place -at his own table,<a name="FNanchor_914_914" id="FNanchor_914_914"></a><a href="#Footnote_914_914" class="fnanchor">[914]</a> assigned to him a regular allowance -from his own banquet,<a name="FNanchor_915_915" id="FNanchor_915_915"></a><a href="#Footnote_915_915" class="fnanchor">[915]</a> and set his throne above the -throne of all the other captive kings who were with him -in Babylon. It might seem a trivial act of mercy, yet -the Jews remembered in their records the very day -of the month on which it had taken place, because they -regarded it as a break in the clouds which overshadowed -them—as "the first gleam of heaven's amber in the -Eastern grey."</p> - -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_477" id="Page_477">[Pg 477]</a></span></p> - - -<h2><a name="EPILOGUE" id="EPILOGUE">EPILOGUE</a></h2> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"On Jordan's banks the Arab's camels stray,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">On Zion's hills the False One's votaries pray,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">The Baal-adorer bows on Sinai's steep;<br /></span> -<span class="i1">Yet there—e'en there—O God, Thy thunders sleep."<br /></span> -<span class="i42"><span class="smcap">Byron.</span><br /></span> -</div></div> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"God, Thou art Love: I build my faith on that."<br /></span> -<span class="i40"><span class="smcap">Browning.</span><br /></span> -</div></div> - - -<p>Before concluding I should like to add a few -words (1) on what some may regard as the too -favourable attitude towards what is called the "Higher -Criticism" adopted in this book; and (2) on the deep, -essential, eternal lessons which we have found in -chapter after chapter of it.</p> - -<p>1. As regards the first, I need only say that the one -thing I seek, the sole thing I care for, is Truth,—truth, -not tradition. Even St. Cyprian, devoted as he was -to custom and tradition, warns us that "Custom without -Truth is only antiquated error," and that what we -believe must be established by reason, not prescribed -by tradition.</p> - -<p>And it cannot be laid down too clearly that the old -view of Inspiration—which defined it as consisting in -verbal dictation, which made the sacred writers "not -only the penmen but the pens of the Holy Spirit,"<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_478" id="Page_478">[Pg 478]</a></span> -and which spoke of every sentence, word, syllable, -and every letter of Scripture as Divine and infallible—was -a dangerous and absolute falsity, and that any -attempt in these days to enforce it as binding on the -intellect and conscience of mankind could only lead -to the utter shipwreck of all sincere and reasonable -religion. "Not needlessly," says the learned author of -<i>Italy and her Invaders</i>—himself an able opponent of -many modern conclusions on the subject—"should I -wish to shake even that faith which practically believes -that the whole Bible, exactly in its present shape, yes, -almost the English Bible just as we have it, came -straight down from heaven. But we do want to get -away from all mere theories as to the way in which -God <i>might</i> have revealed Himself, and to learn as -much as we can of the way in which He <i>has</i> revealed -Himself in actual fact, and in real human -lives."<a name="FNanchor_916_916" id="FNanchor_916_916"></a><a href="#Footnote_916_916" class="fnanchor">[916]</a></p> - -<p>To do this has been one of my objects in this -volume, and in the preceding volume on the First -Book of Kings.</p> - -<p>2. We have now only to cast one last glance on -this book, and on the lessons which it is meant to -teach.</p> - -<p>Consider, first, its deep and varied interest. It has -the combined value of History and of Biography; -and, in dealing with both, its aim is to pass over all -minor and earthly details, and to show the method -of God's dealings both with nations and with the -individual soul.</p> - -<p>If we look at the book only as a History, it -shows us in the briefest possible compass a series of<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_479" id="Page_479">[Pg 479]</a></span> -national events of the greatest importance in the annals -of mankind. We become witnesses of the fierce -occasional struggles between Israel and Judah, and -of the constant warfare of both with those wild surrounding -nations—the people of Moab, and of Edom, -Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek, the Philistines also, -and them that dwell at Tyre. We watch the indomitable -resistance of Tyre to Assyria and Babylon. We -see the Northern Kingdom of Israel rise into wealth, -power, and luxury, only to sink into deep moral corruption, -until, at last, the patience of God is exhausted, -and He obliterates its very existence in an apparently -final and irremediable overthrow. We witness -the rise, culmination, and fall of Syria; the culmination -and the crashing overthrow of Nineveh; the rise -and the splendour of Babylon. We see the surging -tide of the nomad Scythians and Cimmerians rise into -flood and ebb away with spent and shallow waves. -We see the petty fortress of Zion triumph in its -defiance of the mighty hosts of Sennacherib because -it is strong in reliance upon God, and we see it grow -faithless to God until it succumbs to the captains of -Nebuchadrezzar. Again and again we observe that the -Almighty stills the raging of the sea, the noise of his -waves, and the madness of the people.</p> - -<p>The conviction is borne upon our soul with overwhelming -power, as we read the pages of Amos, of -Isaiah, and of Jeremiah, that, in spite of all their rage -and tumult, and apparently irresistible dominance, God -still sitteth above the water-floods, and God remaineth -a King for ever.</p> - -<p>Side by side with this spectacle of the dealing of -God with nations, in which we see written in large -letters, in characters of blood and of fire, His dealing with<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_480" id="Page_480">[Pg 480]</a></span> -guilty nations, we have abundantly in these chapters -the narrower yet more intense interest which arises -from the contemplation of human nature—one and the -same in its general elements, but infinitely varied in -its conditions—in the lives of individual men. It is -revealed to us as in a picture—it is brought home to -us, not by didactic inferences, but with the silent conviction -which springs from the evidence of facts—that -wealth is nothing, and rank nothing, and power nothing, -but that the only thing of essential importance in -human lives is whether a man does that which is good -or that which is evil in the sight of the Lord. Good -and bad kings pass before us; and though the -best kings, like Hezekiah and Josiah, were no more -free from earthly misfortune than are any of the saints -of God—though Hezekiah had to suffer anguish and -humiliation, and Josiah died in defeat on the battle-field,—yet -we are irresistibly led to the belief: "Say ye -of the righteous that it shall be well with him; for -they shall eat the fruit of their doings. Woe unto the -wicked! It shall be ill with him; for the work of his -hands shall be done to him."</p> - -<p>We all have a guide in life. "We are not left to -steer our course even by the stars, which the clouds -of earth may dim. The ship has something on board -which points towards the spiritual pole of the universe. -I will not venture to call it an <i>infallible</i> guide. It -wavers with tremulous sensitiveness; it may be deflected -by disturbing influences; but still in the main -it points with mysterious fidelity towards the pole of -our spirits, even God. And what is this compass -which we have for our guidance? Some would call -it Conscience; but we call it by a holier name, and say -that even as the needle is acted on by the magnetic<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_481" id="Page_481">[Pg 481]</a></span> -current, so our spiritual compass is the spirit of man -acted on by the Spirit of the living and infinite God." -The lesson of this book—of every book of biography or -of history—is that men are noble and useful in proportion -as they are true to that law of an enlightened conscience -which represents to them the will and the voice of -God.</p> - -<p>Ahaziah and Jehoram of Judah, tainted with the -blood of Jezebel, and perverted by the example of -Ahab, live wretchedly, reign contemptibly, and perish -miserably; while good Jehoshaphat and pious Josiah -are richly blessed. In the vaunting elation of Amaziah, -in the blood-stained ferocity of Jehu, in the ruthless -examples of usurpation and murder set by king after -king in Israel, and in the consequences which befell -them, we see that "fruit is seed." Shallum, Menahem, -Pekah, Athaliah, have to pay a terrible price for brief -spells of troubled royalty; and the slow corruption and -disintegration of the people reflects the vile example of -their rulers. Like king, like people; like people, like -priest. We look on at a succession of thrilling scenes—the -horrors of beleaguered cities, the raptures of unexpected -deliverance, the insulting vanities of triumph; -we hear the wail that rises from long lines of fettered -captives as they turn their backs weeping upon their -native land. And we are told "strange stories of the -deaths of kings." We see the King of Moab sacrificing -his eldest son to Chemosh upon the wall of Kir-Haraseth -in the sight of three invading hosts. We shudder to -think of Ahaz and Manasseh passing their children -through the fire before the grim bull-headed monster -in the valley of the children of Hinnom. We see the -two ghastly piles of the heads of young princes on -either side the gates of Jezreel. We see Jehu driving<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_482" id="Page_482">[Pg 482]</a></span> -his fierce chariot over the body of the painted Tyrian -Queen. We catch a glimpse of the sackcloth under -the purple of the King of Israel as he rends his clothes -at the horrible cry of mothers who have devoured their -babes. We see the child Joash standing with the -high priest in the Temple amid the blast of trumpets, -while the alien murderess is pushed out and hewn to -the ground. We see Manasseh dragged with hooks to -Babylon. We watch the haggard face of the miserable -Zedekiah as his sons are slaughtered before the eyes -which thenceforth are blinded for evermore. We burn -with indignation to see the villain Ishmael close with -corpses the well of Mizpah. But even when the phantasmagoria -seems most appalling and most bloody, we -watch the Day-star from on high begin to shed its -glory over the grey east. In due time that Day-star -was to rise in men's hearts and on the world, with -healing in His wings; and we feel that somehow, -beyond the smoke and stir of earth's anguish,</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"God's in His heaven,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">All's right with the world."<br /></span> -</div></div> - -<p>And like a Greek chorus amid the agonies of destiny -stand the prophets, those clearest and greatest of moral -teachers. They, in spite of their holiness and faithfulness, -are not exempt from the calamities of life. Amos -was insulted and expelled by the high priest of Bethel; -Urijah was martyred; Hosea's prophecy is one long -and almost unbroken wail; Isaiah was mocked and -slandered by the priests of Jerusalem, and, if the -tradition be true, sawn asunder; Micah, though spared, -prophesied under imminent peril; Jeremiah, saddest -of mankind, type of the suffering servant of Jehovah, -was smitten in the face by the priest Pashur, thrust<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_483" id="Page_483">[Pg 483]</a></span> -into the stocks for the general derision, flung into a -deathful prison, let down into a miry well, hurried into -exile, defied, denounced, insulted, at last in all probability -martyred. Prophets in general were hated -and disbelieved. They were the eternal antagonists -of priests and mobs. With priests they had so little -affinity, that when a prophet was born a priest, like -Jeremiah and Ezekiel, he might count on the undying -hatred and antagonism of his order. Priests, with -scarcely an exception, under every erring or apostatising -king, from Rehoboam to Ahaz, from Ahaz to -Zedekiah, with a monotony of meanness, did nothing -but acquiesce, careful mainly for their own rights and -revenues; prophets did little but raise, against them -and their party, an unavailing protest. When, in the -days of the priest-regent Jehoiada, the priests had -power, he had made a special ordinance that there -should be overseers in the Temple whose function it -should be to put in the stocks and the collar "every -man that is mad, and that maketh himself a prophet";<a name="FNanchor_917_917" id="FNanchor_917_917"></a><a href="#Footnote_917_917" class="fnanchor">[917]</a> -and Shemaiah was quite indignant that there should -be any delay in putting this convenient ordinance into -force. Priests were chiefly absorbed in functions and -futilities in the exact spirit of their guilty successors in -the days of Christ. There could be little sympathy -between them and the inspired messengers who spoke -of such reliance on observances with almost passionate -scorn, and to whom religion meant righteousness -towards men and faith in the Living God.</p> - -<p>This high lesson of Prophecy came into greater -prominence with each succeeding generation. It had -been taught by Amos, the first of the literary prophets,<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_484" id="Page_484">[Pg 484]</a></span> -with emphatic distinctness. It was summarised by -Hosea in words which our Saviour loved to quote: -"Go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, -and not sacrifice." It had been uttered by Micah in an -outburst of splendid poetry which summed up all that -God requires. It was reiterated in many forms by -Isaiah and by Jeremiah in words of richer moral value -than all that came from the teaching of the priestly -functionaries from the days when Aaron seduced Israel -with his golden calf till the days when Caiaphas and -Annas goaded the multitude to prefer Barabbas to -Jesus, and to shout of their Messiah, "Let Him be -crucified."</p> - -<p>It was the richest fruit which sprang from the long -Divine discipline of the nation,—the knowledge that -outward things are of no avail to save any man; that -God requires righteousness, that God looketh at the -heart.</p> - -<p>And the prophets themselves had to learn by the -irony of events that no suppression of local sanctuaries -under Hezekiah, no multiplication of ceremonies and -acceptance of Deuteronomic Codes under Josiah, were -deep enough to change men's hearts. Isaiah, like -Amos, dwells with anger on the reliance upon vain -ritual, which is so cheap a substitute for genuine -holiness; and Jeremiah, despairing utterly of that -reformation under Josiah of which he had once felt -hopeful, had to denounce the new reliance on the -Temple and its sacrifices. He ultimately felt no confidence -in anything except in a new covenant in which -God Himself would write His law upon men's hearts, -and all should know Him from the least even to the -greatest.</p> - -<p>But the History of Prophecy also in this epoch is<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_485" id="Page_485">[Pg 485]</a></span> -marked by events of world-wide importance. In the -days of Isaiah we see the change of Israel from a -nation into a church of the faithful, for which alone he -has any permanent hope. In him, too, we hear the -first distinct utterances of the final form in which -should be fulfilled the Messianic hope. Under Jeremiah -there was still further advance. He points, as -Joel does, to the epoch of the gift of the Holy Spirit, -and shows that God does not only deal with men as -nations, or as churches, or even as families, but as -beings with individual souls.</p> - -<p>This and much besides we have seen in the foregoing -pages, in which we have endeavoured to point the -lessons of the Books of Kings. The one main lesson -which the narrative is meant to teach is absolute faith -and trust in God, as an anchor which holds amid the -wildest storms of ruin, and of apparently final failure. -Not until we have realised that truth can we hear the -words of God, or see the vision of the Almighty. -When we have learnt it, we shall not fear, though the -hills be moved and carried into the midst of the sea. -It is the lesson which gets behind the meaning of -failure, and raises us to a height from which we can -look down on prosperity as a thing which—except in -fatally delusive semblance—cannot exist apart from -righteousness and faith. This is the lesson of life, the -lesson of lessons. If it does not solve all problems on -their intellectual side, it scatters all perplexities in the -spiritual sphere. It shows us that duty is the reward -of duty, and that there can be no happiness save for -those who have learnt that duty and blessedness are -one. And thus even by this book of annals—annals of -wild deeds and troubled times—we may be taught the -truths which find their perfect illustration and proof in<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_486" id="Page_486">[Pg 486]</a></span> -the life and teaching of the Son of God. When those -truths are our real possession, the work of life is done. -Then</p> - -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"Vigour may fail the towering fantasy,<br /></span> -<span class="i1">But yet the Will rolls onward, like a wheel<br /></span> -<span class="i1">In even motion by the love impelled<br /></span> -<span class="i1">That moves the sun in heaven and all the stars."<br /></span> -</div></div> -<hr class="chap" /> - -<p><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_487" id="Page_487">[Pg 487]</a></span></p> - - - -<h2><a name="APPENDIX_I" id="APPENDIX_I">APPENDIX I</a></h2> - -<h3><i>THE KINGS OF ASSYRIA, AND SOME OF THEIR -INSCRIPTIONS.</i></h3> - - -<p>Dates from the <i>Eponym Canon</i> and the Assyrian Monuments; -Schrader, <i>Cuneiform Inscriptions, and the Old Testament</i>, E. Tr., -1888, pp. 167-187.</p> - -<p> -<span class="smcap">b.c.</span><br /> -<br /> -860.—Shalmaneser II.<br /> -<br /> -854.—Battle of Karkar. War with <i>Ahab</i> and <i>Benhadad</i>.<br /> -<br /> -842.—War with Hazael. Tribute of <i>Jehu</i>.<br /> -<br /> -825.—Samsi-Ramman.<a name="FNanchor_918_918" id="FNanchor_918_918"></a><a href="#Footnote_918_918" class="fnanchor">[918]</a><br /> -<br /> -812.—Ramman-Nirari.<br /> -<br /> -783.—Shalmaneser III.<br /> -<br /> -773.—Assur-dan III.<br /> -<br /> -763.—June 15th. Eclipse of the sun.<br /> -<br /> -755.—Assur-Nirari.<br /> -<br /> -745.—Tiglath-Pileser II.<br /> -<br /> -742.—Azariah (Uzziah) heads a league of nineteen Hamathite<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 2em;">districts against Assyria (?).</span><br /> -<br /> -740.—Death of Uzziah (?).<br /> -<br /> -738.—Tribute of Menahem, Rezin, and Hiram.<br /> -<br /> -734.—Expedition to Palestine against Pekah. Tribute of Ahaz.<br /> -<br /> -732.—Capture of Damascus. Death of Rezin. First actual<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 2em;">collision between Israel and Assyria.</span><br /> -<br /> -728.—Hoshea refuses tribute.<br /> -<br /> -727.—Shalmaneser IV.<br /> -<br /> -724.—Siege of Samaria begun.<br /> -<br /> -722.—Sargon. Fall of Samaria.<br /> -<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_488" id="Page_488">[Pg 488]</a></span><br /> -721.—Defeat of Merodach-Baladan.<br /> -<br /> -720.—Battle of Raphia. Defeat of Sabaco, King of Egypt.<br /> -<br /> -715.—Subjugated people deported to Samaria. Accession of<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Hezekiah.</span><br /> -<br /> -711.—Capture of Ashdod.<br /> -<br /> -707.—Building of great palace of Dur-Sarrukin.<br /> -<br /> -709.—Sargon expels Merodach-Baladan, and becomes King of<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Babylon.</span><br /> -<br /> -705.—Assassination (?) of Sargon.<br /> -<br /> -705.—Sennacherib.<br /> -<br /> -704.—Embassy of Merodach-Baladan to Hezekiah.<br /> -<br /> -703.—Belibus made King of Babylon.<br /> -<br /> -702.—Construction of the Bellino Cylinder.<br /> -<br /> -721.—Siege of Ekron. Defeat of Egypt at Altaqu. Siege of<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Jerusalem. Campaign against Hezekiah and Tirhakah</span><br /> -<span style="margin-left: 2em;">disastrously concluded at Pelusium and Jerusalem.</span><br /> -<br /> -681.—Murder of Sennacherib.<br /> -<br /> -681.—Esar-haddon.<br /> -<br /> -676.—Manasseh pays tribute.<br /> -<br /> -668.—Assur-bani-pal (Sardanapalus).<br /> -<br /> -608.—Death of Josiah in the battle of Megiddo against Pharaoh<br /> -<span style="margin-left: 2em;">Necho.</span><br /> -</p> - -<p>The dates and names of Assyrian kings as given in <i>Records -of the Past</i> (ii. 207, 208) do not exactly accord with these in -all cases.</p> - -<table class="middle" summary="Assyrian Kings"> - <tbody> - <tr> - <td> </td> - <td class="center"><span class="smcap">b.c.</span></td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Tiglath-Pileser II.</td> - <td>950</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Assur-dan II.</td> - <td>930</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Rimmon-Nirari II.</td> - <td>911</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Tiglath-Uras II.</td> - <td>889</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Assur-natzu-pal</td> - <td>883</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Shalmaneser II.</td> - <td>858</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Assur-dain-pal (a rebel)</td> - <td>825</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Samsi-Rimmon II.</td> - <td>823</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Rimmon-Nirari III.</td> - <td>810</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Shalmaneser III.</td> - <td>781</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Assur-dan III.</td> - <td>771</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Assur-Nirari</td> - <td>753</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Tiglath-Pileser III. (Pul)<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_489" id="Page_489">[Pg 489]</a></span></td> - <td>745</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Shalmaneser IV. (an usurper)</td> - <td>727</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Sargon (Jareb?) (usurper)</td> - <td>722</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Sennacherib</td> - <td>705</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Esar-haddon I.</td> - <td>681</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Assur-bani-pal</td> - <td>668</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td colspan="2"><hr class="hr2" /></td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Destruction of Nineveh under Esar-haddon II., or Sarakos</td> - <td>606</td> - </tr> - </tbody> -</table> - - - -<h6>INSCRIPTION OF SHALMANESER II. ON THE BLACK OBELISK -IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM<a name="FNanchor_919_919" id="FNanchor_919_919"></a><a href="#Footnote_919_919" class="fnanchor">[919]</a></h6> - -<p>It begins with an invocation to the gods Rimmon, Adar, -Merodach, Nergal, Beltis, Istar, and proceeds:—</p> - -<p>"I am Shalmaneser, the strong king, king of all the four Zones -of the Sun, the marcher over the whole world, ... who has laid -his yoke upon all lands hostile to him, and has swept them like -a whirlwind."</p> - -<p>It tells of his campaigns against the Hittites etc., etc.</p> - -<p>The allusion to Jehu runs as follows:—</p> - -<p>"The tribute of Yahua, son of Khumri, silver, gold, bowls of -gold, vessels of gold, goblets of gold, pitchers of gold, lead, -sceptres for the king's hand, staves, I received."</p> - -<p>This inscription is supplemented by another on a monolith -found at Karkh, twenty miles from Diarbekr (<i>Records</i>, iii -81-100), which mentions the battle of Karkar, with its slaughter -of fourteen thousand of the enemy, among whom was -Sirlai—<i>i.e.</i>, Ahab of Israel.</p> - - -<p class="center">II</p> - -<p class="center">TIGLATH-PILESER II. (CIRC. B.C. 739)</p> - -<p>In his Records he mentions no less than five Hebrew kings—Azariah, -Jehoahaz (Ahaz), Menahem, Pekah, Hoshea—as well -as Rezin of Damascus, Hiram of Tyre, etc. His name perhaps -means "He who puts his trust in Adar." See <i>Records of the</i><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_490" id="Page_490">[Pg 490]</a></span> -<i>Past</i>, v. 45-52; Schrader, <i>Keilinschr.</i>, pp. 149-151; G. Smith, -<i>Assyrian Discoveries</i>, pp. 254-287.</p> - -<p>Unfortunately the inscriptions are very mutilated and fragmentary.</p> - - -<p class="center">III</p> - -<p>Our chief knowledge of <span class="smcap">Sargon</span> is from the great inscription -in the Palace of Khorsabad. It is translated by Prof. Dr. Jules -Oppert, <i>Records of the Past</i>, ix. 1-21. The king's inscription at -Bavian, north-east of Mosul, is in the same volume, pp. 21-28, -translated by Dr. T. G. Pinches. See, too, <i>id.</i>, vii. 21-56, xi. 15-40.</p> - -<p>The Khorsabad inscription has these passages:—</p> - -<p>"The great gods have made me happy by the constancy of -their affection; they have granted me the exercise of my sovereignty -over all kings."</p> - -<p>He says:—</p> - -<p>"I besieged and occupied the town of Samaria; I took twenty-seven -thousand two hundred and eighty of its inhabitants captive. -I took from them fifty chariots, but left them the rest of their -belongings. I placed my lieutenants over them; I renewed the -obligations imposed upon them <i>by one of the kings who preceded -me</i>." [Tiglath-Pileser, whom Sargon does not choose to name.]</p> - -<p>"Hanun, King of Gaza, and Sabaco, Sultan of Egypt, allied -themselves at <i>Raphia</i> to oppose me. I put them to flight. -Sabaco fled, and no one has seen any trace of him since. I -imposed a tribute on Pharaoh, King of Egypt."</p> - -<p>He tells us that he defeated the usurper Ilubid of Hamath, -who had been a smith; burnt Karkar; and flayed Ilubid alive.</p> - -<p>He defeated Azuri and Jaman of Ashdod, and his most persistent -enemy, Merodach-Baladan, son of Jakin, King of Chalda.</p> - -<p>He ends with a prayer that Assur may bless him.</p> - - -<p class="center">IV</p> - -<p>Bellino's Cylinder comprises the first two years of <span class="smcap">Sennacherib</span>. -It is translated by Mr. H. F. Talbot, <i>Records of the Past</i>, -i. 22-32. It was published by Layard in the first volume of -<i>British Museum Inscriptions</i>, pl. 63. The facsimile of it was made -by Bellino.</p> - -<p>It begins:—</p> - -<p>"<span class="smcap">Sennacherib</span>, the great king, the powerful king, the king of -Assyria, the king unrivalled, the pious monarch, the worshipper<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_491" id="Page_491">[Pg 491]</a></span> -of the great gods, ... the noble warrior, the valiant hero, the first -of all kings, the great punisher of unbelievers who are breakers -of the holy festivals.</p> - -<p>"Assur, my lord, has given me an unrivalled monarchy. Over -all princes he has raised triumphantly my arms.</p> - -<p>"In the beginning of my reign I defeated Marduk-Baladan, -King of Babylon, and his allies the Elamites, in the plains near -the city of Kish. He fled alone; he got into the marshes full of -reeds and rushes, and so saved his life."</p> - -<p>(He proceeds to narrate the spoiling of Marduk's camp, and -his palace in Babylon, and how he carried off his wife, his harem, -his nobles.)</p> - -<p>We see here an illustration of the vaunting tones of this king -which are so faithfully reproduced in 2 Kings xviii.</p> - -<p>His Bull Inscription, chiefly relating to his defeats of Merodach-Baladan, -is translated by Rev. J. M. Rodwell (<i>Records of the Past</i>, -vii. 57-64).</p> - - -<p class="center">V</p> - -<p>The Taylor Cylinder, so called from its former possessor, is -a hexagonal clay prism found at Nineveh in 1830, and now -in the British Museum (translated by Mr. H. F. Talbot, -<i>Records of the Past</i>, i. 33-53).</p> - -<p>The first two campaigns of Sennacherib are related as on the -Bellino Cylinder. The Taylor Cylinder narrates campaigns of -his first eight years.</p> - -<p>The story of the third campaign narrates the defeat of Elulus, -King of Sidon; the tribute of Menahem, King of Samaria; the -defeat of Zidka, King of Askelon; the revolt of Ekron, which -deposed the Assyrian vassal Padi, and sent him in iron chains to -Hezekiah; the battle of Egypt and Ethiopia at Altaqu (Eltekon, -Josh. xv. 59), and the capture of Timnath. Of Hezekiah the king -says:—</p> - -<p>"And Hezekiah, King of Judah, who had not bowed down at -my feet, forty-six of his strong cities, castles, and smaller towns, -with warlike engines, I captured; 200,500 people, small and great, -male and female, horses, sheep, etc., without number, I carried -off. Himself I shut up like a bird in a cage inside Jerusalem. -Siege-towers against him I constructed. I gave his plundered -cities to the kings of Ashdod, Ekron, and Gaza. I diminished his -kingdom; I augmented his tribute. The fearful splendour of my<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_492" id="Page_492">[Pg 492]</a></span> -majesty had overwhelmed him. The horsemen, soldiers, etc., -which he had collected for the fortification of Jerusalem his -royal city, now carried tribute, thirty talents of gold, eight hundred -of silver, scarlet, embroidered woven cloth, large precious -stones, ivory couches and thrones, skins, precious woods; his -daughters, his harem, his male and female slaves, unto Nineveh, my -royal city, after me he sent; and to pay tribute he sent his envoy."</p> - -<p>He then narrates his fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh campaigns -against Elam, etc. His eighth was against "the children of -Babylon, wicked devils," etc. He ends by describing the splendour -of the palace which he built.</p> - - -<p class="center">VI</p> - -<p>An inscription of <span class="smcap">Esar-haddon</span>, found at Kouyunjik, now in the -British Museum, mentions his receipt of the intelligence of his -father's murder by his unnatural brothers, while he was commanding -his fathers army on the northern confines.</p> - -<p>"From my heart I made a vow. My liver was inflamed -with rage. Immediately I wrote letters, saying I assumed the -sovereignty of my Father's House." He prayed to the gods and -goddesses; they encouraged him, and in spite of a great snowstorm -he reached Nineveh, and defeated his brother, because -Istar stood by his side and said to their army, "An unsparing -deity am I" (<i>Records of the Past</i>, iii, 100-108).</p> - - -<p class="center">VII</p> - -<p>A terra-cotta cylinder of <span class="smcap">Assur-bani-pal</span> (the Sardanapalus of -the Greeks) is now in the British Museum. It is translated by -Mr. G. Smith, <i>Records of the Past</i>, i. 55-106, ix. 37-64; Oppert, -<i>Mmoire sur les Rapports de l'Egypte et l'Assyrie</i>; and G. Smith, -<i>Annals of Assur-bani-pal</i>.</p> - -<p>Its most interesting parts relate to the campaign of his father -Esar-haddon against Egypt, and how Tirhakah, King of Egypt -and Ethiopia, reoccupied Memphis. He defeated the army of -Tirhakah, who, to save his life, fled from Memphis to Thebes. -The Assyrians then took Thebes, and restored Necho's father, -Psamatik I., to Memphis and Sais, and other Egyptian kings, -friends of Assyria, who had fled before Tirhakah. The kings, -however, proved ungrateful, and made a league against him. He -therefore threw them into fetters, and had them brought to<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_493" id="Page_493">[Pg 493]</a></span> -Nineveh, but subsequently released Necho with splendid presents. -Tirhakah fled to Ethiopia, where he "went to his place of night"—<i>i.e.</i>, -died.</p> - - - -<hr class="chap" /> -<h2><a name="APPENDIX_II" id="APPENDIX_II">APPENDIX II</a></h2> - -<h3><i>INSCRIPTION IN THE TUNNEL OF SILOAM</i></h3> - - -<p>The inscription of Siloam is the oldest known Hebrew inscription. -"It is engraved on the rocky wall of the subterranean -channel which conveys the water of the Virgin's Spring at -Jerusalem into the Pool of Siloam. In the summer of 1880 one -of the native pupils of Dr. Schick, a German architect, was playing -with other lads in the Pool, and while wading up the subterranean -channel slipped and fell into the water. On rising to -the surface he noticed, in spite of the darkness, what looked like -letters on the rock which formed the southern wall of the channel. -Dr. Schick visited the spot, and found that an ancient inscription, -concealed for the most part by the water, actually existed there." -The level of the water was lowered, but the inscription had been -partly filled up with a deposit of lime, and the first intelligible -copy was made by Professor Sayce in February 1881, and six -weeks later by Dr. Guthe. Professor Sayce had to sit for hours in -the mud and water, working under masonry or earth. There can -be little doubt that this work is alluded to in 2 Kings xx. 20; -2 Chron. xxxii. 30; Isa. viii. 6 ("the waters of Shiloah ["the -tunnel"?] which flow softly").</p> - -<p>The alphabet is that used by the prophets before the exile, -somewhat like that on the Moabite Stone, and on early Israelitish -and Jewish seals. The language is pure Hebrew, with only one -unknown word—<i>zadah</i>, in line three: perhaps "excess" or -"obstacle."</p> - -<p>Professor Sayce thinks that it proves that "the City of David" -(Zion) must have been on the southern hill, the so-called Ophel. -If so, the Valley of the Sons of Hinnom must be the rubbish-choked -Tyropœon, under which must be the tombs of the kings, and the -relics of the Temple and Palace destroyed by Nebuchadrezzar.</p> - -<p>The inscription is:—</p> - -<p>"The excavation! Now this is the history of the excavation. -While the excavators were lifting up the pick each towards his<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_494" id="Page_494">[Pg 494]</a></span> -neighbour, and while there were yet three cubits [to excavate], -there was heard the voice of one man calling to his neighbour, -for there was an excess in the rock on the right hand [and on -the left?]. And after that on the day of excavating, the excavators -had struck pick against pick, one against another, the water -flowed from the spring [<i>mts</i>, "exit," 2 Chron. xxxii. 30] to the -Pool" (that of Siloam, which therefore was the only one which -then existed) "for twelve hundred cubits. And [part] of a cubit -was the height of the rock over the head of the excavators" -(Sayce, <i>Records of the Past</i>, i. 169-175).</p> - -<p>The letters are on an artificial tablet cut in the wall of rock, -nineteen feet from where the subterranean conduit opens on the -Pool of Siloam, and on the right-hand side. The conduit is at -first sixteen feet high, but lessens in one place to no more than -two feet. It is, according to Captain Conder, seventeen hundred -and eight yards long, but not in a straight line, as there are two -<i>culs-de-sac</i>, caused by faulty engineering. The engineers, beginning, -as at Mount Cenis, from opposite ends, intended to meet -in the middle, but failed. The floor has been rounded to allow -the water to flow more easily. It is a splendid piece of engineering -for that age.</p> - -<p>The Pool of Siloam is at the south-east end of a hill which -lies to the south of the Temple hill: the Virgin's Fountain is on -the opposite side of the hill, more to the north, and is the only -natural spring or "Gihon" near Jerusalem, so that its water was -of supreme importance. Being outside the city wall, a conduit -was necessary. Hezekiah "stopped all the fountains" (2 Chron. -xxxii. 4)—<i>i.e.</i>, concealed them. By providing a subterranean -channel for them, he saved them from the enemy and secured -the water-supply of the besieged city.</p> - - - -<hr class="chap" /> -<h2><a name="APPENDIX_III" id="APPENDIX_III">APPENDIX III</a></h2> - -<h3><i>WAS THERE A GOLDEN CALF AT DAN?</i></h3> - - -<p>The question might seem absurd, but for its solution I must refer -to my paper on the subject in the <i>Expositor</i> for October 1893.</p> - -<p>The <i>sole</i> authorities for a calf at Dan are 1 Kings xii. 28-30; -2 Kings x. 29. If in the former passage we alter <i>one letter</i>, and -read האפד (the "ephod") for האחד (the "one")—as Klostermann<span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_495" id="Page_495">[Pg 495]</a></span> -suggests—we throw light on an obscure and perhaps corrupt -passage. The allusion then would be to Micah's old idolatrous -image (which <i>may</i> have been a calf) at Dan. The two words -"and in Dan" in 2 Kings x. 29 may easily have been (as Klostermann -thinks) an exegetical gloss added from the error of one -letter in 1 Kings xii. 30.</p> - -<p>Dan was a most unlikely place to select: for (1) It was a remote -frontier town; and (2) there was no room, and no necessity there, -for a new cultus beside the ancient one established some -centuries earlier, and still served by priests who were direct -lineal descendants of Moses (Judg. xviii. 30, 31).</p> - -<p>This would further account for the absolute silence of prophets -and historians about any golden calf at Dan; and it adds to the -inherent probability, also supported by some evidence, that there -were <i>two</i> cherubic calves at Bethel.</p> - -<p>For further arguments I must refer to my paper.</p> - - - -<hr class="chap" /> -<h2><a name="APPENDIX_IV" id="APPENDIX_IV">APPENDIX IV</a></h2> - -<h3><i>DATES OF THE KINGS OF ISRAEL AND JUDAH, AS -GIVEN BY KITTEL AND OTHER MODERN CRITICS<a name="FNanchor_920_920" id="FNanchor_920_920"></a><a href="#Footnote_920_920" class="fnanchor">[920]</a></i> -</h3> - -<table class="middle" summary="Kings of Israel and Judah"> - <tbody> - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2"><span class="smcap">Israel</span></td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td> </td> - <td class="center"><span class="smcap">b.c.</span></td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Ahaziah</td> - <td>855-854</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Jehoram</td> - <td>854-842</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Jehu</td> - <td>842-814</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Jehoahaz</td> - <td>814-797</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Joash</td> - <td>797-781</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Jeroboam II.</td> - <td>781-740</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Zachariah</td> - <td>740</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Shallum</td> - <td>740</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Menahem</td> - <td>740-737</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Pekahiah</td> - <td>737-735</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Pekah</td> - <td>735-734</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Hoshea</td> - <td>734-725</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td colspan="2"><hr class="hr2" /></td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td class="center" colspan="2"><span class="smcap">Judah</span><span class="pagenum"><a name="Page_496" id="Page_496">[Pg 496]</a></span></td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td> </td> - <td class="center"><span class="smcap">b.c.</span></td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat</td> - <td>851-843</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Ahaziah ben-Jehoram</td> - <td>843-842</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Athaliah</td> - <td>842-836</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Joash ben-Ahaziah</td> - <td>836-796</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Amaziah</td> - <td>796-783</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Amaziah-Uzziah</td> - <td>783-737</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Jotham</td> - <td>737-735</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Ahaz</td> - <td>735-715</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Hezekiah</td> - <td>715-686</td> - </tr> - <tr><td> </td></tr> - <tr> - <td>Manasseh</td> - <td>686-641</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Amon</td> - <td>641-639</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Josiah</td> - <td>639-608</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Jehoahaz</td> - <td>608</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Jehoiakim</td> - <td>608-597</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Jehoiachin</td> - <td>597</td> - </tr> - <tr> - <td>Zedekiah</td> - <td>597-586</td> - </tr> - </tbody> -</table> - -<hr /> - -<div class="fn"> - -<h3>FOOTNOTES:</h3> - -<p><a name="Footnote_1_1" id="Footnote_1_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1_1"><span class="label">[1]</span></a> Rawlinson, <i>Kings of Israel and Judah</i>, p. 86. "The name of -Ahaziah ('the Lord taketh hold'), like that of all Ahab's sons, -testifies to the fact that the husband of Jezebel still worshipped -Jehovah. Among the names of the judges and kings before Ahab -in Israel, and Asa in Judah, scarcely a single instance occurs of names -compounded with Jehovah; thenceforward they became the rule" -(Wellhausen, <i>Israel and Judah</i>, Es. 1, p. 66).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_2_2" id="Footnote_2_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2_2"><span class="label">[2]</span></a> 1 Kings xxii. 47; 2 Kings iii. 9: comp. viii. 20.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_3_3" id="Footnote_3_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3_3"><span class="label">[3]</span></a> 2 Sam. viii. 2. On the ethics of these wars of extermination, -such as are commanded in the Pentateuch, and were practised by -Joshua, Samuel, Saul, David, and others, see Josh. vi. 17; 1 Sam. xv. -3, 33; 2 Sam. viii. 2, etc., and Mozley's <i>Lectures on the Old Testament</i>, -pp. 83-103.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_4_4" id="Footnote_4_4"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4_4"><span class="label">[4]</span></a> See Stade, i. 86. He gives a photograph and translation of it at -p. 534.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_5_5" id="Footnote_5_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5_5"><span class="label">[5]</span></a> See <i>Records of the Past</i>, xi. 166, 167.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_6_6" id="Footnote_6_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6_6"><span class="label">[6]</span></a> 2 Kings i. 2; Heb., <i>be'ad hass'bakāh</i>; LXX., διὰ τοῦ δικτυωτοῦ; -Vulg., <i>per cancellos</i> (comp. 1 Kings vii. 18; 2 Chron. iv. 12).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_7_7" id="Footnote_7_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7_7"><span class="label">[7]</span></a> LXX., Βάαλ μυῖαν θεὸν Ἀκκαρών. So, too, Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, IX. ii. 1. It is -possible that the god was represented holding a fly as the type of pestilence, -just as the statue of Pthah held in its hands a mouse (Herod., -ii. 141). Flies convey all kinds of contagion (Plin., <i>H. N.</i>, x. 28).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_8_8" id="Footnote_8_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8_8"><span class="label">[8]</span></a> Pausan., v. 14, 2.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_9_9" id="Footnote_9_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9_9"><span class="label">[9]</span></a> The name, or a derisive modification of it, was given by the Jews -in the days of Christ to the prince of the devils. In Matt. xii. 24 the -true reading is Βεελζεβούλ, which perhaps means (in contempt) "the -lord of dung"; but might mean "the lord of the [celestial] habitation" -(οἰκοδεσπότην). Comp. Matt. x. 25; Eph. ii. 2; "Baal Shamaim," -the Belsamen of Augustine (Gesen., <i>Monum. Phœnic.</i>, 387; Movers, -<i>Phnizier</i>, i. 176). For "opprobrious puns" applied to idols, see -Lightfoot, <i>Exercitationes ad Matt.</i>, xii. 24. The common word for idols, -<i>gilloolim</i>, is perhaps connected with <i>galal</i>, "dung." Hitzig thinks -that the god was represented under the symbol of the <i>Scarabus -pillularius</i>, or dung-beetle.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_10_10" id="Footnote_10_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10_10"><span class="label">[10]</span></a> Lev. xx. 6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_11_11" id="Footnote_11_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11_11"><span class="label">[11]</span></a> בַּאַל שֵׂצַר (LXX., δασύς), whether in reference to his long shaggy -locks, or his sheepskin <i>addereth</i>, μηλωτή (Zech. xiii. 4; Heb. xii. 37).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_12_12" id="Footnote_12_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12_12"><span class="label">[12]</span></a> ζώνη δερματίνη (Matt iii. 4).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_13_13" id="Footnote_13_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13_13"><span class="label">[13]</span></a> There is perhaps an intentional play of words between "man -(אישׁ) of God" and "fire (אשׁ) of God" (Klostermann).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_14_14" id="Footnote_14_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14_14"><span class="label">[14]</span></a> Hebrew.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_15_15" id="Footnote_15_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15_15"><span class="label">[15]</span></a> "Come down <i>quickly</i>" (2 Kings i. 9).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_16_16" id="Footnote_16_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16_16"><span class="label">[16]</span></a> Luke ix. 51-56. This is a more than sufficient answer to the -censure of Theodoret, that "they who condemn the prophet are -wagging their tongues against God." The remark is based on utter -misapprehension; and if we are to form no judgment on the morality -of Scripture examples, they would be of no help for us. Compare the -striking remark of the minister to Balfour of Burleigh in Scott's -<i>Old Mortality</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_17_17" id="Footnote_17_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17_17"><span class="label">[17]</span></a> Quoted by Rev. Professor Lumby, <i>ad loc.</i></p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_18_18" id="Footnote_18_18"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18_18"><span class="label">[18]</span></a> <i>Elijah</i>, p. 146.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_19_19" id="Footnote_19_19"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19_19"><span class="label">[19]</span></a> This is practically the sum-total of the answer given again and -again by Canon Mozley in his <i>Lectures on the Old Testament</i>, 2nd -edition, 1878. For instance, he says that "the Jewish idea of -justice gives us the reason why the Divine commands (of exterminating -wars, etc.) were then adapted to man as the agent for -executing them, and are not adapted now" (p. 102).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_20_20" id="Footnote_20_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20_20"><span class="label">[20]</span></a> Comp. Ezek. xviii. 2-30.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_21_21" id="Footnote_21_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21_21"><span class="label">[21]</span></a> For the <i>idea</i> involved see Num. xi. 1; Deut. iv. 24; Psalm xxi. 9; -Isa. xxvi. 11; Heb. x. 27, etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_22_22" id="Footnote_22_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22_22"><span class="label">[22]</span></a> 1 Chron. ii. 55, where "Shimeathites" means "men of the -tradition," and "scribes," "men of letters."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_23_23" id="Footnote_23_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23_23"><span class="label">[23]</span></a> Josh. iv. 19; v. 9, 10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_24_24" id="Footnote_24_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24_24"><span class="label">[24]</span></a> Deut. xi. 30. It is on a hill south-west of Shiloh (<i>Seilun</i>), near -the road to Jericho (Hos. iv. 15; Amos iv. 4). The name means "a -circle," and there may have been an ancient circle of sacred stones -there.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_25_25" id="Footnote_25_25"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25_25"><span class="label">[25]</span></a> 2 Kings iv. 38.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_26_26" id="Footnote_26_26"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26_26"><span class="label">[26]</span></a> 1 Kings xiii.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_27_27" id="Footnote_27_27"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27_27"><span class="label">[27]</span></a> As there are fords at Jericho, the object of this miracle, as of the -one subsequently ascribed to Elisha, is not self-evident. Nothing -is more certain than that there is a Divine economy in the exercise -of supernatural powers. The pomp and prodigality of superfluous -portents belong, not to Scripture, but to the <i>Acta sanctorum</i>, and the -saint-stories of Arabia and India.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_28_28" id="Footnote_28_28"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28_28"><span class="label">[28]</span></a> Deut. xxi. 17. The Hebrew is פִּי־שְׁנַיִם, "a mouthful, or ration of -two." Comp. Gen. xliii. 34. Even Ewald's "<i>Nur Zweidrittel und auch -diese kaum</i>" is too strong (<i>Gesch.</i>, iii. 517). In no sense was Elisha -greater than Elijah: he wrought more wonders, but he left little of -his teaching, and produced on the mind of his nation a far less strong -impression.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_29_29" id="Footnote_29_29"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29_29"><span class="label">[29]</span></a> In 2 Kings vi. 17 the stormblast (<i>sā'ārāh</i>) and chariots and -horses of fire are part of a vision of the Divine protection. Comp. -Isa. lxvi. 15; Job xxxviii, 1; Nah. i. 3; Psalms xviii. 6-15, civ. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_30_30" id="Footnote_30_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30_30"><span class="label">[30]</span></a> That is, the protection and defence of Israel by thy prayers.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_31_31" id="Footnote_31_31"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31_31"><span class="label">[31]</span></a> Even the Church-father St. Ephrm Syrus evidently felt some -misgivings. He says: "Suddenly there came from the height a storm -of fire, and in the midst of the flame the form of a chariot and horses, -and parted them both asunder; the one of them it left on the earth, -the other it carried to the height; but whether the wind carried him, -or in what place it left him, the Scripture has not informed us, but -it says that after some years, a terrifying letter from him full of -menaces, was delivered to King Jehoram of Judah" (quoted by Keil -<i>ad loc.</i>). See 2 Chron. xxi. 12. The letter is called "a writing" -(<i>miktb</i>).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_32_32" id="Footnote_32_32"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32_32"><span class="label">[32]</span></a> 2 Kings ii. 11; Ecclus. xlviii. 12. The LXX. curiously says ἐν -συσσεισμῷ ὡς εἰς τὸν οὐρανόν. So too the Rabbis, <i>Sucah</i>, f. 5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_33_33" id="Footnote_33_33"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33_33"><span class="label">[33]</span></a> The circumstance has left its trace in the proverbs of nations, and -in the German word <i>Mantelkind</i> for a spiritual successor.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_34_34" id="Footnote_34_34"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34_34"><span class="label">[34]</span></a> 2 Kings ii. 14. LXX., καὶ οὐ διῃρέθη; Vulg., <i>Percussit aquas, et -non sunt divis</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_35_35" id="Footnote_35_35"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35_35"><span class="label">[35]</span></a> Mal. iv. 4-6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_36_36" id="Footnote_36_36"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36_36"><span class="label">[36]</span></a> <i>Bava-Metzia</i>, f. 37, 2, etc. His name is used for incantations in -the Kabbala. <i>Kitsur Sh'lh</i>, f. 71, 1 (Hershon, <i>Talmudic Miscellany</i>, -p. 340). The chair set for him is called "the throne of Elijah." -For many Rabbinic legends see Hershon, <i>Treasures of the Talmud</i>, -pp. 172-178. The Persians regard him as the teacher of Zoroaster.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_37_37" id="Footnote_37_37"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37_37"><span class="label">[37]</span></a> The name Elisha means "My God is salvation."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_38_38" id="Footnote_38_38"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38_38"><span class="label">[38]</span></a> Gen. xiii. 10. "The city of palms" (Deut. xxxiv. 3).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_39_39" id="Footnote_39_39"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39_39"><span class="label">[39]</span></a> Jos., <i>B. J.</i>, IV. viii. 3; Robinson, <i>Bibl. Researches</i>, i. 554.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_40_40" id="Footnote_40_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40_40"><span class="label">[40]</span></a> Abarbanel's notion that they meant "Ascend to heaven as Elijah -did" is absurd.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_41_41" id="Footnote_41_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41_41"><span class="label">[41]</span></a> קֵרֵהַ This means bald at the back of the head, as נִבֵּהַ (<i>gibbeach</i>), -means "forehead-bald" (Ewald, iii. 512). Elisha could not have -been bald from old age, since he lived on for nearly sixty years, and -must have been a young man. Baldness involved a suspicion of -leprosy, and was disliked by Easterns (Lev. xxi. 5, xiii. 43; -Isa. iii. 17, 24, xv. 2), as much as by the Romans (Suet., <i>Jul. Cs.</i>, 45; -<i>Domit.</i>, 18). Elisha's prophetic activity lasted through the reigns of -Joram, Jehu, Jehoahaz, and Joash (<i>i.e.</i>, 12 + 28 + 17 + 2 years).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_42_42" id="Footnote_42_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42_42"><span class="label">[42]</span></a> The κατέπαιζον of the Vat. LXX. implies persistent and vehement -insult. The Post-Mishnic Rabbis, however, say that Elisha was -punished with sickness for this deed (<i>Bava-Metzia</i>, f. 87, 1).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_43_43" id="Footnote_43_43"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43_43"><span class="label">[43]</span></a> There are great difficulties in the statement (2 Kings iii. 1) that -he began to reign in the eighteenth year of Jehoshaphat. I have not -entered, nor shall I enter, into the minute and precarious conjectures -necessitated by the uncertainties and contradictions of this synchronism -introduced into the narrative by some editor. Suffice it -that with the aid of the Assyrian records we have certain <i>points de -repre</i>; from which we can, with the assistance of the historian, -conjecturally restore the main data. In the dates given at the head -of the chapters I follow Kittel, as a careful inquirer. Some of the -approximately fixed dates are (see <a href="#APPENDIX_I">Appendix I.</a>):— -</p> -<p><br /> -854. Battle of Karkar (Ahab and Benhadad against Shalmaneser II.)<br /> -738. Tribute of Menahem to Tiglath-Pileser II.<br /> -732. Fall of Damascus.<br /> -722. Capture of Samaria by Sargon.<br /> -720. Defeat of Sabaco by Sargon in battle of Raphia.<br /> -705. Accession of Sennacherib.<br /> -701. Campaign against Hezekiah.<br /> -608. Death of Josiah.<br /> -</p> - - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_44_44" id="Footnote_44_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44_44"><span class="label">[44]</span></a> But neither the man of God from Judah nor Amos directly -denounce the calf-worship, so much as its concomitant sins and -irregularities.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_45_45" id="Footnote_45_45"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45_45"><span class="label">[45]</span></a> Perhaps the true reading is "pillars" (LXX., Vulg., Arab.).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_46_46" id="Footnote_46_46"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46_46"><span class="label">[46]</span></a> He is called "a sheep-master," <i>noked</i>; LXX., νωκήδ. Elsewhere -the word occurs only in Amos i. 1. The Alex. LXX. has ἦν φέρων -φόρον.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_47_47" id="Footnote_47_47"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47_47"><span class="label">[47]</span></a> According to the Moabite Stone.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_48_48" id="Footnote_48_48"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48_48"><span class="label">[48]</span></a> It is not clear whether the lambs and rams were sent with the -fleeces. The A.V. says "lambs and rams with their wool," in accordance -with Josephus—μυριάδας εἴκοσι προβάτων σὺν τοῖς πόκοις. The LXX. -has the vague ἐπὶ πόκων, and implies that this was a special fine after -a defeat in the revolt (ἐν τῇ ἐπαναστάσει): but comp. Isa. xvi. 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_49_49" id="Footnote_49_49"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49_49"><span class="label">[49]</span></a> 2 Chron. xx. 1-30.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_50_50" id="Footnote_50_50"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50_50"><span class="label">[50]</span></a> Robinson (<i>Bibl. Res.</i>, ii. 157) identifies it with the brook <i>Zered</i>. -Deut. ii. 13; Num. xxi. 12. The name means "valley of water-pits." -W. R. Smith quotes Doughty, <i>Travels</i>, i. 26.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_51_51" id="Footnote_51_51"></a><a href="#FNanchor_51_51"><span class="label">[51]</span></a> Comp. 1 Kings xxii. 7. The phrase "who poured water on the -hands of Elijah" is a touch of Oriental custom which the traveller in -remote parts of Palestine may still often see. Once, when driven by -a storm into the house of the Sheykh of a tribe which had a rather -bad reputation for brigandage, I was most hospitably entertained; and -the old white-haired Sheykh, his son, and ourselves were waited -on by the grandson, a magnificent youth, who immediately after the -meal brought out an old richly chased ewer and basin, and poured -water over our hands, soiled by eating out of the common dish, of -course without spoons or forks.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_52_52" id="Footnote_52_52"></a><a href="#FNanchor_52_52"><span class="label">[52]</span></a> This seems to have struck Josephus (<i>Antt.</i>, IX. iii. 1), who says -that "he <i>chanced</i> to be in a tent (ἔτυχε κατεσκηνωκώς) outside the -host."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_53_53" id="Footnote_53_53"></a><a href="#FNanchor_53_53"><span class="label">[53]</span></a> Comp. 1 Sam. x. 5; 1 Chron. xxv. 1; Ezek. i. 3, xxxiii. 22. -<i>Menaggēn</i> is one who plays on a stringed instrument, <i>n'gnāh</i>. The -Pythagoreans used music in the same way (Cic., <i>Tusc. Disp.</i>, iv. 2).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_54_54" id="Footnote_54_54"></a><a href="#FNanchor_54_54"><span class="label">[54]</span></a> Deut. xx. 19, 20.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_55_55" id="Footnote_55_55"></a><a href="#FNanchor_55_55"><span class="label">[55]</span></a> Lev. ii. 1. Comp. 1 Kings xviii. 36.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_56_56" id="Footnote_56_56"></a><a href="#FNanchor_56_56"><span class="label">[56]</span></a> This dreadful result crippled the revolt of Vindex against Nero.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_57_57" id="Footnote_57_57"></a><a href="#FNanchor_57_57"><span class="label">[57]</span></a> Jeroboam I., <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 937; Joram, 854.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_58_58" id="Footnote_58_58"></a><a href="#FNanchor_58_58"><span class="label">[58]</span></a> Isa. xv. 1, Kir of Moab; Jer. xlviii. 31, Kir-heres. It is built on -a steep calcareous rock, surrounded by a deep, narrow glen, which -thence descends westward to the Dead Sea, under the name of the -Wady Kerak. We know that the armies of Nineveh habitually -practised these brutal modes of devastation in the districts which -they conquered. See Layard, <i>passim</i>; Rawlinson, <i>Ancient Monarchies</i> -ii. 84.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_59_59" id="Footnote_59_59"></a><a href="#FNanchor_59_59"><span class="label">[59]</span></a> 1 Kings xviii. 27. Comp. Psalm xxxv. 23, xliv. 23, lxxxiii. -1, etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_60_60" id="Footnote_60_60"></a><a href="#FNanchor_60_60"><span class="label">[60]</span></a> Comp. Micah vi. 7. This is an entirely different incident from -that alluded to in Amos ii. 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_61_61" id="Footnote_61_61"></a><a href="#FNanchor_61_61"><span class="label">[61]</span></a> Eusebius (<i>Prp. Evang.</i>, iv. 16) quotes from Philo's Phœnician -history a reference to human sacrifices (τοῖς τιμωροῖς δαίμοσιν) at -moments of desperation.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_62_62" id="Footnote_62_62"></a><a href="#FNanchor_62_62"><span class="label">[62]</span></a> The rendering is doubtful. LXX., καὶ ἐγένετο μετάμελος μέγας ἐπὶ -Ἰσράηλ; Vulg., indignatio <i>in</i> Israel; Luther, <i>Da ward Israel sehr -zornig</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_63_63" id="Footnote_63_63"></a><a href="#FNanchor_63_63"><span class="label">[63]</span></a> Amos ii. 1-3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_64_64" id="Footnote_64_64"></a><a href="#FNanchor_64_64"><span class="label">[64]</span></a> Hos. i. 4: "I will avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house -of Jehu."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_65_65" id="Footnote_65_65"></a><a href="#FNanchor_65_65"><span class="label">[65]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, IX. iv. 2. This perhaps is only suggested by the -reminiscences of 1 Kings xviii. 2, 3, 12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_66_66" id="Footnote_66_66"></a><a href="#FNanchor_66_66"><span class="label">[66]</span></a> Lev. xxv. 39-41; Matt. xviii. 25.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_67_67" id="Footnote_67_67"></a><a href="#FNanchor_67_67"><span class="label">[67]</span></a> 2 Kings iv. 10. Not "a little chamber on the wall" (A.V.), but -"an <i>alyah</i> with walls" (margin, R.V.).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_68_68" id="Footnote_68_68"></a><a href="#FNanchor_68_68"><span class="label">[68]</span></a> Frankl., <i>Jews in the East</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_69_69" id="Footnote_69_69"></a><a href="#FNanchor_69_69"><span class="label">[69]</span></a> John iv. 27: "Then came His disciples, and marvelled that He -was <i>talking</i> (μετὰ γυναικὸς) <i>with a woman</i>."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_70_70" id="Footnote_70_70"></a><a href="#FNanchor_70_70"><span class="label">[70]</span></a> 2 Kings iv. 13: "Behold, thou hast been careful for us with all -this care" (LXX., πᾶσαν τὴν ἔκστασιν ταύτην).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_71_71" id="Footnote_71_71"></a><a href="#FNanchor_71_71"><span class="label">[71]</span></a> The Sheykh with whom I stayed at Bint es Jebeil could think of -no return which I could offer for his hospitality so acceptable as if -I would say a good word for him to the authorities at Beyrout.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_72_72" id="Footnote_72_72"></a><a href="#FNanchor_72_72"><span class="label">[72]</span></a> Gehazi is usually called the <i>na'ar</i> or "lad" of Elisha—a term -implying lower service than Elisha's "ministry" to Elijah.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_73_73" id="Footnote_73_73"></a><a href="#FNanchor_73_73"><span class="label">[73]</span></a> 2 Kings iv. 23. Hebrew "Peace"; A.V., "It shall be well."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_74_74" id="Footnote_74_74"></a><a href="#FNanchor_74_74"><span class="label">[74]</span></a> Salutations occupy some time in the formally courteous East. -Comp. Luke x. 4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_75_75" id="Footnote_75_75"></a><a href="#FNanchor_75_75"><span class="label">[75]</span></a> 2 Kings viii. 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_76_76" id="Footnote_76_76"></a><a href="#FNanchor_76_76"><span class="label">[76]</span></a> Not "lap," as in A. V. (Heb., <i>beged</i>); LXX. συνέλιξε πλῆρες τὸ -ἱμάτιον αὐτοῦ; Vulg., <i>implevit vestem suam</i> (both correctly).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_77_77" id="Footnote_77_77"></a><a href="#FNanchor_77_77"><span class="label">[77]</span></a> Heb., <i>paquoth</i>; LXX., τολύπην ἀγρίαν; Vulg; <i>colocynthidas agri</i>. -Hence the name <i>cucumis prophetarum</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_78_78" id="Footnote_78_78"></a><a href="#FNanchor_78_78"><span class="label">[78]</span></a> Lord of the Chain and "Three lands." Three wadies meet at -this spot, a little west of Bethel.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_79_79" id="Footnote_79_79"></a><a href="#FNanchor_79_79"><span class="label">[79]</span></a> 2 Kings iv. 42. Karmel, Lev. ii. 14. Perhaps a sort of frumenty.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_80_80" id="Footnote_80_80"></a><a href="#FNanchor_80_80"><span class="label">[80]</span></a> The word for "wallet" (<i>tsiqlon</i>; Vulg., <i>pera</i>) occurs here only. -Peshito, "garment." The Vatican LXX. omits it. The Greek version -has ἐν κωρύκῳ αὐτοῦ.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_81_81" id="Footnote_81_81"></a><a href="#FNanchor_81_81"><span class="label">[81]</span></a> See Lev. ii. 14, xxiii. 14.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_82_82" id="Footnote_82_82"></a><a href="#FNanchor_82_82"><span class="label">[82]</span></a> 2 Kings iv. 43. The word for "his servitor" (<i>m'chartho</i>) is used -also of Joshua. It does not mean a mere ordinary attendant. LXX., -λειτουργός; Vulg., <i>minister</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_83_83" id="Footnote_83_83"></a><a href="#FNanchor_83_83"><span class="label">[83]</span></a> It is curiously omitted by Josephus, though he mentions him -(Ἄμανος) as the slayer of Ahab (<i>Antt.</i>, VIII. xv. 5). The name is an -old Hebrew name (Num. xxvi. 40).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_84_84" id="Footnote_84_84"></a><a href="#FNanchor_84_84"><span class="label">[84]</span></a> The word <i>l'boosh</i> means a gala dress. Comp. v. 5; Gen. xlv. 22. -χιτῶνες ἐπημοιβοί (Hom., <i>Od.</i>, xiv. 514). Comp. viii. 249.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_85_85" id="Footnote_85_85"></a><a href="#FNanchor_85_85"><span class="label">[85]</span></a> Elisha would not be likely to <i>touch</i> the place.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_86_86" id="Footnote_86_86"></a><a href="#FNanchor_86_86"><span class="label">[86]</span></a> Now the <i>Burda</i> ("cold") and the Nahr-el-Awj.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_87_87" id="Footnote_87_87"></a><a href="#FNanchor_87_87"><span class="label">[87]</span></a> Compare the answer of Abraham to the King of Sodom (Gen. -xiv. 23).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_88_88" id="Footnote_88_88"></a><a href="#FNanchor_88_88"><span class="label">[88]</span></a> The feeling which influenced Naaman is the same which led -the Jews to build Nahardea in Persia of stones from Jerusalem. -Altars were to be of earth (Exod. xx. 24), but no altar is mentioned -in 2 Kings v. 17, and the LXX. does not even specify <i>earth</i> (γόμος -ζεῦγος ἡμιόνων).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_89_89" id="Footnote_89_89"></a><a href="#FNanchor_89_89"><span class="label">[89]</span></a> This is the only place in Scripture where Rimmon is mentioned, -though we have the name Tab-Rimmon ("Rimmon is good"), 1 Kings -xv. 18, and Hadad-Rimmon (Zech. xii. 11). He was the god of the -thunder. The word means "pomegranate," and some have fancied -that this was one of his symbols. But the resemblance may be -accidental, and the name was properly <i>Ramman</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_90_90" id="Footnote_90_90"></a><a href="#FNanchor_90_90"><span class="label">[90]</span></a> See Deut. xxxii. 8, where the LXX. has κατὰ ἀριθμὸν ἀγγέλων.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_91_91" id="Footnote_91_91"></a><a href="#FNanchor_91_91"><span class="label">[91]</span></a> The moral difficulty must have been early felt, for the Alexandrian -LXX. reads καὶ προσκυνήσω ἄμα αὐτῷ ἐγὼ Κυρίῳ τῷ Θεῷ μου. But -he would still be bowing in the House of Rimmon, though he might -in his heart worship God. "Elisha, like Elijah" (says Dean Stanley), -"made no effort to set right what had gone so wrong. Their mission -was to make the best of what they found; not to bring back a rule -of religion which had passed away, but to dwell on the Moral Law -which could be fulfilled everywhere, not on the Ceremonial Law which circumstances seemed to have put out of their reach: 'not -sending the Shunammite to Jerusalem' (says Cardinal Newman), 'not -eager for a proselyte in Naaman, yet making the heathen fear the -Name of God, and proving to them that there was a prophet in -Israel'" (Stanley, <i>Lectures</i>, ii. 377; Newman, <i>Sermons</i>, viii. 415).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_92_92" id="Footnote_92_92"></a><a href="#FNanchor_92_92"><span class="label">[92]</span></a> Prov. iv. 14, 15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_93_93" id="Footnote_93_93"></a><a href="#FNanchor_93_93"><span class="label">[93]</span></a> Prov. xvii. 14.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_94_94" id="Footnote_94_94"></a><a href="#FNanchor_94_94"><span class="label">[94]</span></a> On Gehazi's lips it meant no more than the incessant <i>Wallah</i>, "by -God," of Mohammedans.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_95_95" id="Footnote_95_95"></a><a href="#FNanchor_95_95"><span class="label">[95]</span></a> 2 Kings v. 19. Heb., <i>kib'rath aretz</i>, "a little way"—literally, -"a space of country." (The Vatican LXX. follows another reading, -εἰς Δεβραθὰ τῆς γῆς; Vulg., <i>electo terr tempore</i>[?].)</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_96_96" id="Footnote_96_96"></a><a href="#FNanchor_96_96"><span class="label">[96]</span></a> LXX., κατεπήδησεν.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_97_97" id="Footnote_97_97"></a><a href="#FNanchor_97_97"><span class="label">[97]</span></a> A talent of silver was worth about 400—an enormous sum for -two half-naked youths.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_98_98" id="Footnote_98_98"></a><a href="#FNanchor_98_98"><span class="label">[98]</span></a> 2 Kings v. 24. The LXX. (εἰς τὸ σκοτεινὸν) seems to have read -אֹפֵל (<i>ophel</i>); "darkness," a treasury or secret place, for צַֹפֶל, and so -the Vulgate <i>jam vesperi</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_99_99" id="Footnote_99_99"></a><a href="#FNanchor_99_99"><span class="label">[99]</span></a> 2 Kings v. 26. The verse is so interpreted by some critics, -especially Ewald, followed by Stanley. Margin, R.V.: "Mine heart -went not from me, when" etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_100_100" id="Footnote_100_100"></a><a href="#FNanchor_100_100"><span class="label">[100]</span></a> Exod. iv. 6; Num. xii. 10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_101_101" id="Footnote_101_101"></a><a href="#FNanchor_101_101"><span class="label">[101]</span></a> The later Rabbis thought that Elisha was too severe with Gehazi, -and was punished with sickness because "he repelled him with both -his hands" (<i>Bava-Metsia</i>, f. 87, 1, and <i>Yalkut Jeremiah</i>).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_102_102" id="Footnote_102_102"></a><a href="#FNanchor_102_102"><span class="label">[102]</span></a> The Hebrew word for "cut off" (<i>qatsab</i>) is very rare. LXX., -ἀπέκνισε ξύλον; Vulg., <i>prcidit lignum</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_103_103" id="Footnote_103_103"></a><a href="#FNanchor_103_103"><span class="label">[103]</span></a> It must be further borne in mind that "the iron did swim" (A.V.) -is less accurate than "made the iron to swim" (R.V.). The LXX. -has ἐπεπόλασε, "brought to the surface." Von Gerlach says, "He -thrust the stick into the water, and raised the iron to the surface."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_104_104" id="Footnote_104_104"></a><a href="#FNanchor_104_104"><span class="label">[104]</span></a> Gen. xxxvii. 17, <i>Dothain</i>, "two wells" (?).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_105_105" id="Footnote_105_105"></a><a href="#FNanchor_105_105"><span class="label">[105]</span></a> Psalm xci. 4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_106_106" id="Footnote_106_106"></a><a href="#FNanchor_106_106"><span class="label">[106]</span></a> Psalm xxxiv. 7.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_107_107" id="Footnote_107_107"></a><a href="#FNanchor_107_107"><span class="label">[107]</span></a> Psalm xci. 11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_108_108" id="Footnote_108_108"></a><a href="#FNanchor_108_108"><span class="label">[108]</span></a> Zech. ix. 8.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_109_109" id="Footnote_109_109"></a><a href="#FNanchor_109_109"><span class="label">[109]</span></a> Isa. lxiii. 9.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_110_110" id="Footnote_110_110"></a><a href="#FNanchor_110_110"><span class="label">[110]</span></a> Adopting the reading of the Syriac version: "And when they -[Elisha and his servant] came down to them [the Syrians]." The -ordinary reading is "to <i>him</i>," which makes the narrative less clear.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_111_111" id="Footnote_111_111"></a><a href="#FNanchor_111_111"><span class="label">[111]</span></a> 2 Kings vi. 19. מַנְוֵרִים, ἀορασία, only found in Gen. xix. 11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_112_112" id="Footnote_112_112"></a><a href="#FNanchor_112_112"><span class="label">[112]</span></a> Deut. xx. 13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_113_113" id="Footnote_113_113"></a><a href="#FNanchor_113_113"><span class="label">[113]</span></a> Num. xxxi. 7.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_114_114" id="Footnote_114_114"></a><a href="#FNanchor_114_114"><span class="label">[114]</span></a> Vulg., <i>Non percuties; neque enim cepisti eos ... ut percutias.</i></p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_115_115" id="Footnote_115_115"></a><a href="#FNanchor_115_115"><span class="label">[115]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, IX. iv. 4, Κρύφα μὲν οὐκέτι ... φανερῶς δέ.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_116_116" id="Footnote_116_116"></a><a href="#FNanchor_116_116"><span class="label">[116]</span></a> Kittel, following Kuenen, surmises that this story has got misplaced; -that it does not belong to the days of Jehoram ben-Ahab and -Benhadad II., but to the days of Jehoahaz ben-Jehu and Benhadad III., -the son of Hazael (<i>Gesch. der Hebr.</i>, 249). In a very uncertain question -I have followed the conclusion arrived at by the majority of -scholars, ancient and modern.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_117_117" id="Footnote_117_117"></a><a href="#FNanchor_117_117"><span class="label">[117]</span></a> So <i>asafœtida</i> is called "devil's dung" in Germany; and the <i>Herba -alcali</i>, "sparrow's dung" by Arabs. The <i>Q'ri</i>, however, supports the -<i>literal</i> meaning; and compare 2 Kings xviii. 27; Jos., <i>B. J.</i>, V. xiii. 7. -Analogies for these prices are quoted from classic authors. Plutarch -(<i>Artax.</i>, xxiv.) mentions a siege in which an ass's head could hardly -be got for sixty drachmas (2 10<i>s.</i>), though usually the whole animal -only cost 1. Pliny (<i>H. N.</i>, viii. 57) says that during Hannibal's -siege of Casilinum a mouse sold for 6 5<i>s.</i></p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_118_118" id="Footnote_118_118"></a><a href="#FNanchor_118_118"><span class="label">[118]</span></a> So Clericus. Comp. Jos. ἐπηράσατο αὐτῇ.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_119_119" id="Footnote_119_119"></a><a href="#FNanchor_119_119"><span class="label">[119]</span></a> Lev. xxvi. 29.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_120_120" id="Footnote_120_120"></a><a href="#FNanchor_120_120"><span class="label">[120]</span></a> Deut. xxviii. 52-58.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_121_121" id="Footnote_121_121"></a><a href="#FNanchor_121_121"><span class="label">[121]</span></a> Jer. xix. 9.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_122_122" id="Footnote_122_122"></a><a href="#FNanchor_122_122"><span class="label">[122]</span></a> Lam. iv. 10: comp. ii. 20; Ezek. v. 10; Jos., <i>B. J.</i>, VI. iii. 4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_123_123" id="Footnote_123_123"></a><a href="#FNanchor_123_123"><span class="label">[123]</span></a> 1 Kings xxi. 27; Isa. xx. 2, 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_124_124" id="Footnote_124_124"></a><a href="#FNanchor_124_124"><span class="label">[124]</span></a> Compare the wrath of Pashur the priest in consequence of the -denunciation of Jeremiah (Jer. xx. 2).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_125_125" id="Footnote_125_125"></a><a href="#FNanchor_125_125"><span class="label">[125]</span></a> 1 Kings xix. 2.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_126_126" id="Footnote_126_126"></a><a href="#FNanchor_126_126"><span class="label">[126]</span></a> In 2 Kings vi. 33 we should read <i>melek</i> (king) for <i>maleak</i> -(messenger). Jehoram repented of his hasty order.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_127_127" id="Footnote_127_127"></a><a href="#FNanchor_127_127"><span class="label">[127]</span></a> The Jews say Gehazi, and his three sons (Jarchi).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_128_128" id="Footnote_128_128"></a><a href="#FNanchor_128_128"><span class="label">[128]</span></a> Lev. xiii. 46; Num. v. 2, 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_129_129" id="Footnote_129_129"></a><a href="#FNanchor_129_129"><span class="label">[129]</span></a> The capitals of the ancient Hittites—a nation whose fame had -been almost entirely obliterated till a few years ago—were Karchemish, -Kadesh, Hamath, and Helbon (Aleppo).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_130_130" id="Footnote_130_130"></a><a href="#FNanchor_130_130"><span class="label">[130]</span></a> <i>Lectures</i>, ii. 345.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_131_131" id="Footnote_131_131"></a><a href="#FNanchor_131_131"><span class="label">[131]</span></a> Jer. xxv. 29; Ezek. xxxviii. 21.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_132_132" id="Footnote_132_132"></a><a href="#FNanchor_132_132"><span class="label">[132]</span></a> See the cases of Samuel (1 Sam. ix. 7), of Ahijah (1 Kings xiv. 3), -and of Elisha himself (2 Kings iv. 42).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_133_133" id="Footnote_133_133"></a><a href="#FNanchor_133_133"><span class="label">[133]</span></a> As Jacob did in sending forward his present to Esau. Comp. -Chardin, <i>Voyages</i>, iii. 217.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_134_134" id="Footnote_134_134"></a><a href="#FNanchor_134_134"><span class="label">[134]</span></a> 2 Kings x. 32, xiii. 3, 22.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_135_135" id="Footnote_135_135"></a><a href="#FNanchor_135_135"><span class="label">[135]</span></a> Isa. xiii. 15, 16; Hos. x. 14, xiii. 16; Nah. iii. 10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_136_136" id="Footnote_136_136"></a><a href="#FNanchor_136_136"><span class="label">[136]</span></a> See Josh. vi. 17, 21; 1 Sam. xv. 3; Lev. xxvii. 28, 29.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_137_137" id="Footnote_137_137"></a><a href="#FNanchor_137_137"><span class="label">[137]</span></a> Psalm cxxxvii. 9.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_138_138" id="Footnote_138_138"></a><a href="#FNanchor_138_138"><span class="label">[138]</span></a> 1 Sam. xxiv. 14; 2 Sam. ix. 8.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_139_139" id="Footnote_139_139"></a><a href="#FNanchor_139_139"><span class="label">[139]</span></a> מַכְבֵּר. Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, IX. iv. 6, δίκτυον διάβροχον. Aquila, Symmachus, -τὸ στρῶμα. Michaelis supposed it to be the mosquito-net -(κωνωπεῖον). Comp. 1 Sam. xix. 13. Ewald suggested "bath-mattress" -(iii. 523). Sir G. Grove (<i>s.v.</i> "Elisha," <i>Bibl. Dict.</i>, ii. 923) -mentions that Abbas Pasha is said to have been murdered in the same -manner. Some, however, think that the measure was taken by way of -cure (Bruce, <i>Travels</i>, iii. 33. Klostermann, <i>ad loc.</i>, alters the text at -his pleasure).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_140_140" id="Footnote_140_140"></a><a href="#FNanchor_140_140"><span class="label">[140]</span></a> 2 Kings viii. 15; LXX., τὸ μαχβάρ; Vulg., <i>stragulum</i>; lit., "woven -cloth."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_141_141" id="Footnote_141_141"></a><a href="#FNanchor_141_141"><span class="label">[141]</span></a> The following genealogy may help to elucidate the troublesome -identity of names:— -</p> -<pre> - OMRI - ____|____ - | | JEHOSHAPHAT - Ahab = Jezebel | - _______|__________________ | - | | | | - Ahaziah Jehoram Athaliah = Jehoram - (of Israel). (of Israel). | (of Judah). - | - Ahaziah - (of Judah). -</pre> - -<p><a name="Footnote_142_142" id="Footnote_142_142"></a><a href="#FNanchor_142_142"><span class="label">[142]</span></a> Jotham ben-Uzziah was not the colleague of his father, but his -public representative.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_143_143" id="Footnote_143_143"></a><a href="#FNanchor_143_143"><span class="label">[143]</span></a> The only other king of Judah whose mother's name is not -mentioned (perhaps because his father Jotham had but one wife) -is Ahaz.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_144_144" id="Footnote_144_144"></a><a href="#FNanchor_144_144"><span class="label">[144]</span></a> 2 Kings xi. 18; 2 Chron. xxi. 11, xxiv. 7.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_145_145" id="Footnote_145_145"></a><a href="#FNanchor_145_145"><span class="label">[145]</span></a> Vulg., <i>Seira</i>; Arab., <i>Sa'ir</i> (but the historian never uses the name -Mount Seir); LXX., Σιώρ. There is perhaps some corruption in the -text, and the reading of the Chronicler "with his princes" shows -that it may have once been צַמ־שָׂרָיו.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_146_146" id="Footnote_146_146"></a><a href="#FNanchor_146_146"><span class="label">[146]</span></a> 2 Kings viii. 21. "The people" (<i>i.e.</i>, the army of Judah) "fled -to their tents." Apparently this means that they slunk away home. -The word "tents" is a reminiscence of their nomad days, like the -treasonable cry, "To your tents, O Israel."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_147_147" id="Footnote_147_147"></a><a href="#FNanchor_147_147"><span class="label">[147]</span></a> Josh. x. 29-39.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_148_148" id="Footnote_148_148"></a><a href="#FNanchor_148_148"><span class="label">[148]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, IX. vi. 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_149_149" id="Footnote_149_149"></a><a href="#FNanchor_149_149"><span class="label">[149]</span></a> 1 Kings xix. 15, 16.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_150_150" id="Footnote_150_150"></a><a href="#FNanchor_150_150"><span class="label">[150]</span></a> 2 Kings viii. 12, 13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_151_151" id="Footnote_151_151"></a><a href="#FNanchor_151_151"><span class="label">[151]</span></a> The name was not uncommon, 1 Chron. ii. 38, iv. 35, xii. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_152_152" id="Footnote_152_152"></a><a href="#FNanchor_152_152"><span class="label">[152]</span></a> 2 Kings xiii. 20, xxiv. 2; Jer. xlviii.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_153_153" id="Footnote_153_153"></a><a href="#FNanchor_153_153"><span class="label">[153]</span></a> 2 Kings vi. 8-23.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_154_154" id="Footnote_154_154"></a><a href="#FNanchor_154_154"><span class="label">[154]</span></a> 2 Kings vii. 6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_155_155" id="Footnote_155_155"></a><a href="#FNanchor_155_155"><span class="label">[155]</span></a> Jehoram = Jehovah is exalted. Ahaziah = Jehovah holds.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_156_156" id="Footnote_156_156"></a><a href="#FNanchor_156_156"><span class="label">[156]</span></a> Vial (<i>pak</i>) only here and in 1 Sam. x. 1. "<i>The</i> oil" (LXX., τὸν -φακὸν τοῦ ἐλαίου).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_157_157" id="Footnote_157_157"></a><a href="#FNanchor_157_157"><span class="label">[157]</span></a> "His habit fit for speed <i>succinct</i>" (Milton).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_158_158" id="Footnote_158_158"></a><a href="#FNanchor_158_158"><span class="label">[158]</span></a> Inner chamber, 1 Kings xx. 30.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_159_159" id="Footnote_159_159"></a><a href="#FNanchor_159_159"><span class="label">[159]</span></a> Perhaps, if Elisha had gone in person, suspicion might have been -aroused. He was not more than fifty at this time, and lived forty-three -years more.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_160_160" id="Footnote_160_160"></a><a href="#FNanchor_160_160"><span class="label">[160]</span></a> <i>Seder Olam</i>, c. 18.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_161_161" id="Footnote_161_161"></a><a href="#FNanchor_161_161"><span class="label">[161]</span></a> It seems as though they were <i>inside</i> the town to defend it, not -a beleaguring host outside.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_162_162" id="Footnote_162_162"></a><a href="#FNanchor_162_162"><span class="label">[162]</span></a> The expression is remarkable, as showing how completely the -prerogative of the Chosen People was supposed to rest with the -Ten Tribes, as the most important representatives of the seed of -Abraham.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_163_163" id="Footnote_163_163"></a><a href="#FNanchor_163_163"><span class="label">[163]</span></a> "Him that is shut up, and him that is left at large in Israel" -(2 Kings ix. 8; 1 Kings xiv. 10, xvi. 3, 4).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_164_164" id="Footnote_164_164"></a><a href="#FNanchor_164_164"><span class="label">[164]</span></a> The A.V. has, less accurately, "in the <i>portion</i> of Jezreel." See -1 Kings xxi. 23. Heb., חֵלֶק. The חֵיל of an Eastern town is the ditch -and empty space—a sort of external <i>pomœrium</i> around it. It is the -place of offal, and the haunt of vultures and pariah dogs.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_165_165" id="Footnote_165_165"></a><a href="#FNanchor_165_165"><span class="label">[165]</span></a> 1 Sam. xvi. 4: "Comest thou peaceably?"</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_166_166" id="Footnote_166_166"></a><a href="#FNanchor_166_166"><span class="label">[166]</span></a> 2 Kings ix. 11, הַמְּשֻׁנָּצ LXX., ὁ ἑπίληπτος. Comp. ver. 20, "he -driveth <i>furiously</i>" (בְשִׁנָּצון).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_167_167" id="Footnote_167_167"></a><a href="#FNanchor_167_167"><span class="label">[167]</span></a> Ver. 12, a lie! (שֶׁקֶר).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_168_168" id="Footnote_168_168"></a><a href="#FNanchor_168_168"><span class="label">[168]</span></a> What is meant by the <i>gerem</i> of the staircase is uncertain. The -word means "a bone" (Aquila, ὀστῶδες), and is, in this connection, an -ἅπαξ λεγόμενον. The Targum explains it as the top vane of a stair-dial. -The margin of the R.V. renders it "on the bare steps." The -Vulgate renders it <i>in similitudinem tribunalis</i>, as though <i>gerem</i> -meant <i>tselem</i>. The LXX. conceal their perplexity by simply translating -the word ἐπὶ τὸ γαρέμ. Grotius and Clericus, <i>in fastigio -graduum</i>. Symmachus, ἐπὶ μίαν τῶν ἀναβαθμίδων.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_169_169" id="Footnote_169_169"></a><a href="#FNanchor_169_169"><span class="label">[169]</span></a> 2 Kings ix. 14: "So Jehu <i>conspired</i> against Joram." The same -word is used in 2 Chron. xxiv. 25, 26.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_170_170" id="Footnote_170_170"></a><a href="#FNanchor_170_170"><span class="label">[170]</span></a> 2 Kings ix. 15, R.V.: "If this be your mind."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_171_171" id="Footnote_171_171"></a><a href="#FNanchor_171_171"><span class="label">[171]</span></a> So far as we know, he never returned to Ramoth-Gilead, of which -indeed we hear no more.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_172_172" id="Footnote_172_172"></a><a href="#FNanchor_172_172"><span class="label">[172]</span></a> Tristram, <i>Land of Moab</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_173_173" id="Footnote_173_173"></a><a href="#FNanchor_173_173"><span class="label">[173]</span></a> Heb., <i>Shiph'hath</i>, "a dust-storm" (LXX., κονιορτόν, αἰ. ὄχλον; Vulg., -<i>globum</i>), not as in A.V. and R.V., "a company." Comp. Isa. lx. 6; -Ezek. xxvi. 10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_174_174" id="Footnote_174_174"></a><a href="#FNanchor_174_174"><span class="label">[174]</span></a> Clearly the rendering "he driveth furiously" is right. The word -"furiously" is <i>beshigga'n</i> (Vulg., <i>prceps</i>), and is connected with -"mad," ver. 11. LXX., ἐν παραλλαγῇ. Arab. Chald., "quietly." -Josephus, "leisurely, and in good order." Such an approach would -not, however, have been at all in accordance with the perilous -urgency of his intent.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_175_175" id="Footnote_175_175"></a><a href="#FNanchor_175_175"><span class="label">[175]</span></a> Jehu, the son of Jehoshaphat, is named from his grandfather Nimshi, -who seems to have been the founder of the greatness of his house.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_176_176" id="Footnote_176_176"></a><a href="#FNanchor_176_176"><span class="label">[176]</span></a> 2 Kings ix. 23: "Turned his hands." Comp. 1 Kings xxii. 34.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_177_177" id="Footnote_177_177"></a><a href="#FNanchor_177_177"><span class="label">[177]</span></a> Ver. 24. Vulg., <i>inter scapulas</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_178_178" id="Footnote_178_178"></a><a href="#FNanchor_178_178"><span class="label">[178]</span></a> LXX., reading צַל בּרְכָּיו.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_179_179" id="Footnote_179_179"></a><a href="#FNanchor_179_179"><span class="label">[179]</span></a> Bidkar, perhaps Bar-dekar, "Son of stabbing." Comp. 1 Kings -iv. 9.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_180_180" id="Footnote_180_180"></a><a href="#FNanchor_180_180"><span class="label">[180]</span></a> Heb., <i>ts'madim</i>, "in pairs"; LXX., ἐπιβεβηκότες ἐπὶ ζεύγη. It is -uncertain whether Jehu and Bidkar were in the same chariot as -Ahab, as Josephus says (καθεζομένους ὄπισθεν τοῦ ἅρματος), or in a -separate chariot.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_181_181" id="Footnote_181_181"></a><a href="#FNanchor_181_181"><span class="label">[181]</span></a> 2 Kings ix. 26: "Saith the Lord." Ephraem Syrus omits these -words. He says that the night before Jehu had seen the blood -of Naboth and his sons in a dream. Comp. Hom., <i>Od.</i>, iii. 258: -Τῷ κε οἱ οὐδὲ θανόντι χυτὴν ἐπὶ γαῖαν ἔχευαν 'Αλλ' ἄρα τονγε κύνες τε -καὶ οἰωνοὶ κατέδαψαν Κείμενον ἐν πεδίῳ.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_182_182" id="Footnote_182_182"></a><a href="#FNanchor_182_182"><span class="label">[182]</span></a> A.V., "By the way of the garden-house." LXX., Βαιθγάν.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_183_183" id="Footnote_183_183"></a><a href="#FNanchor_183_183"><span class="label">[183]</span></a> The text is a little uncertain.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_184_184" id="Footnote_184_184"></a><a href="#FNanchor_184_184"><span class="label">[184]</span></a> Thenius supposes "Gur" to mean "a caravanserai." Comp. -2 Chron. xxvi. 7, <i>Gur-Baal</i>; Vulg., <i>Hospitium Baalis</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_185_185" id="Footnote_185_185"></a><a href="#FNanchor_185_185"><span class="label">[185]</span></a> The account of the Chronicler (2 Chron. xxii. 9) differs from that -of the earlier historian. It may, however, be (uncertainly) reconciled with it as in the text, if we suppose the words "he was hid in -Samaria" to mean in Megiddo, in the territory of Samaria. Obviously, -however, the traditions varied. There are difficulties about the story, -for Ibleam is on the west towards Megiddo, and not between Jezreel -and Samaria.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_186_186" id="Footnote_186_186"></a><a href="#FNanchor_186_186"><span class="label">[186]</span></a> פּוּךְ, "Lead-glance." A mixture of pulverised antimony (<i>stibium</i>) -and zinc is still used by women in the East for this purpose. <i>In calliblepharis -dilatat oculos</i> (Plin., <i>H. N.</i>, xxxiii.). Keren-Happuk, the name -given by Job to one of his daughters, means "horn of stibium." The -object could hardly have been to <i>attract</i> Jehu (as Ephraem Syrus -thinks), for Jezebel had already a <i>grandson</i> twenty-three years old -(viii. 26).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_187_187" id="Footnote_187_187"></a><a href="#FNanchor_187_187"><span class="label">[187]</span></a> A.V., "<i>Tired</i> her head." Comp. <i>tiara</i>. Lit., "made good"; -LXX., ἠγάθυνε.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_188_188" id="Footnote_188_188"></a><a href="#FNanchor_188_188"><span class="label">[188]</span></a> Josephus gives the sense very well: Καλὸς δοῦλος ὁ ἀποκτείνας τὸν -δεσπότην (<i>Antt.</i>, IX. vi. 4). The same question might have been -addressed to Baasha, Shallum, Menahem, Pekah, and Hoshea; but at -least Jehu might plead a prophet's call.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_189_189" id="Footnote_189_189"></a><a href="#FNanchor_189_189"><span class="label">[189]</span></a> "Two or three." Lit., "two three," like the old English "two -three" for "several."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_190_190" id="Footnote_190_190"></a><a href="#FNanchor_190_190"><span class="label">[190]</span></a> Ver. 33. Heb., "He trod her underfoot." LXX., Συνεπάτησαν -αὐτήν; Vulg., <i>Conculcaverunt eam</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_191_191" id="Footnote_191_191"></a><a href="#FNanchor_191_191"><span class="label">[191]</span></a> Liv., i. 46-48.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_192_192" id="Footnote_192_192"></a><a href="#FNanchor_192_192"><span class="label">[192]</span></a> Prov. xi. 10. Compare the remark of Voltaire, who saw "le -peuple ivr de vin et de joie de la mort de Louis XIV."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_193_193" id="Footnote_193_193"></a><a href="#FNanchor_193_193"><span class="label">[193]</span></a> 1 Kings xvi. 31. At this time Ethbaal was dead. He reigned -probably from <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 940-908, and died at the age of sixty-eight -(Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, VIII. xiii. 1, IX. vi. 6; <i>c. Ap.</i>, i. 18).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_194_194" id="Footnote_194_194"></a><a href="#FNanchor_194_194"><span class="label">[194]</span></a> 1 Kings xxi. 23.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_195_195" id="Footnote_195_195"></a><a href="#FNanchor_195_195"><span class="label">[195]</span></a> Comp. Psalm lxxxiii. 10. Her name remained a by-word till -the latest days (Rev. ii. 20), and the Spanish Jews called their -persecutress Isabella the Catholic "Jezebel."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_196_196" id="Footnote_196_196"></a><a href="#FNanchor_196_196"><span class="label">[196]</span></a> Omri, 12 years; Ahab, 22; Ahaziah, 18; Jehoram, 12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_197_197" id="Footnote_197_197"></a><a href="#FNanchor_197_197"><span class="label">[197]</span></a> The reading of 2 Kings x. 1, "Unto the rulers of <i>Jezreel</i>," is clearly -wrong. The LXX. reads, "Unto the rulers of Samaria." Unless -"Jezreel" be a clerical error for Israel, we must read, "He sent letters -from Jezreel unto the rulers of Samaria."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_198_198" id="Footnote_198_198"></a><a href="#FNanchor_198_198"><span class="label">[198]</span></a> Fig-baskets, Jer. xxiv. 2. The word <i>dudim</i> is rendered "pots" in 1 Sam. ii. 14. LXX., ἐν καρτάλλοις; Vulg., <i>in cophinis</i>. In Psalm -lxxxi. 6 the LXX. has ἐν τῷ κοφίνῳ.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_199_199" id="Footnote_199_199"></a><a href="#FNanchor_199_199"><span class="label">[199]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, IX. vi. 5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_200_200" id="Footnote_200_200"></a><a href="#FNanchor_200_200"><span class="label">[200]</span></a> Heb., <i>Tsibourm</i>; LXX., βουνούς.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_201_201" id="Footnote_201_201"></a><a href="#FNanchor_201_201"><span class="label">[201]</span></a> Comp. 1 Sam. xvii. 54; 2 Macc. xv. 30.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_203_203" id="Footnote_203_203"></a><a href="#FNanchor_203_203"><span class="label">[203]</span></a> 2 Kings x. 12. The shepherds House of Meeting (<i>Beth-equed-haroim</i>). -LXX., ἐν Βαιθακάθ; Vulg., <i>ad cameram pastorum</i>; Aquila, -οἶκος κάμψεως. It has been conjectured by Klostermann that it belonged -to the Rechabites, that they had been persecuted by Jezebel, -and that they were glad to help in taking vengeance on her descendants.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_204_204" id="Footnote_204_204"></a><a href="#FNanchor_204_204"><span class="label">[204]</span></a> The Chronicler (2 Chron. xxii. 8) says "<i>sons</i> of the brethren -of Ahaziah."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_205_205" id="Footnote_205_205"></a><a href="#FNanchor_205_205"><span class="label">[205]</span></a> LXX., ἡ δυναστεύουσα.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_206_206" id="Footnote_206_206"></a><a href="#FNanchor_206_206"><span class="label">[206]</span></a> 2 Kings x. 14, A.V., "at the pit." Lit., "in" or "into the cistern."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_207_207" id="Footnote_207_207"></a><a href="#FNanchor_207_207"><span class="label">[207]</span></a> See Martin, <i>Hist. de France</i>, ix. 114.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_208_208" id="Footnote_208_208"></a><a href="#FNanchor_208_208"><span class="label">[208]</span></a> Whittier.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_209_209" id="Footnote_209_209"></a><a href="#FNanchor_209_209"><span class="label">[209]</span></a> Jer. xxxv. 1-19. Josephus (<i>Antt.</i>, IX. vi. 6) calls him "a good -man and a just, who had long been a friend of Jehu." "He was," -says Ewald (<i>Gesch.</i>, iii. 543), "of a society of those who despaired -of being able to observe true religion undisturbedly in the midst of -the nation with the stringency with which they understood it, and -therefore withdrew into the desert."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_210_210" id="Footnote_210_210"></a><a href="#FNanchor_210_210"><span class="label">[210]</span></a> Jer. xxxv. (written about <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 604). Communities of Nazarites -seem to have sprung up at this epoch, perhaps as a protest against -the prevailing luxury (Amos ii. 11).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_211_211" id="Footnote_211_211"></a><a href="#FNanchor_211_211"><span class="label">[211]</span></a> In Josephus it is Jehonadab who blesses the king.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_212_212" id="Footnote_212_212"></a><a href="#FNanchor_212_212"><span class="label">[212]</span></a> Heb., יֵש וָיֵשׁ.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_213_213" id="Footnote_213_213"></a><a href="#FNanchor_213_213"><span class="label">[213]</span></a> Striking hands was a sign of good faith (Job xvii. 3; Prov. xxii. 26).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_214_214" id="Footnote_214_214"></a><a href="#FNanchor_214_214"><span class="label">[214]</span></a> He did it "in subtilty" (בְצָקְבָה). This substantive occurs -nowhere else, but is connected with the name Jacob. LXX., ἐν -πτερνισμῷ, "in taking by the heel," with reference to the name Jacob, -"supplanter."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_215_215" id="Footnote_215_215"></a><a href="#FNanchor_215_215"><span class="label">[215]</span></a> Lit., "mouth to mouth." LXX., στόμα εἰς στόμα.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_216_216" id="Footnote_216_216"></a><a href="#FNanchor_216_216"><span class="label">[216]</span></a> Ver. 22, מֶלְהָּהַה, <i>Vestiarum</i>, occurs here only. The LXX. -omits it or puts it in Greek letters. Targum, κάμπτραι, "chests" -Sil. Italicus (iii. 23) describes the robes of the priests of the -Gaditanian Hercules,— -</p> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i20">"<i>Nec discolor ulli,</i><br /></span> -<span class="i0"><i>Ante aras cultus; velantur corpora lino</i><br /></span> -<span class="i0"><i>Et Pelusiaco prfulget stamine vertex.</i>"<br /></span> -<span class="i32"><span class="smcap">Keil</span>, <i>ad loc.</i><br /></span> -</div></div> -<p> -It was a mixture of "the rich dye of Tyre and the rich web of -Nile."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_217_217" id="Footnote_217_217"></a><a href="#FNanchor_217_217"><span class="label">[217]</span></a> The phrase may be impersonal, "when one [<i>i.e.</i>, they] had -finished the sacrifice"; but the narrative seems to imply that Jehu -offered it himself (LXX., ὡς συνετέλεσαν ποιοῦντες τὴν ὁλοκαύτωσιν -Vulg., <i>cum completum esset holocaustum</i>).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_218_218" id="Footnote_218_218"></a><a href="#FNanchor_218_218"><span class="label">[218]</span></a> A.V., images; R.V., pillars.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_219_219" id="Footnote_219_219"></a><a href="#FNanchor_219_219"><span class="label">[219]</span></a> Comp. Ezra vi. 11; Dan. ii. 5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_220_220" id="Footnote_220_220"></a><a href="#FNanchor_220_220"><span class="label">[220]</span></a> Amos i. 11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_221_221" id="Footnote_221_221"></a><a href="#FNanchor_221_221"><span class="label">[221]</span></a> Amos ii. 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_222_222" id="Footnote_222_222"></a><a href="#FNanchor_222_222"><span class="label">[222]</span></a> Hos. i. 4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_223_223" id="Footnote_223_223"></a><a href="#FNanchor_223_223"><span class="label">[223]</span></a> Psalm lxxvi. 10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_224_224" id="Footnote_224_224"></a><a href="#FNanchor_224_224"><span class="label">[224]</span></a> -</p> -<p> -Jehu 842-814.<br /> -Jehoahaz 814-797.<br /> -Joash 797-781.<br /> -Jeroboam II. 781-740.<br /> -Zechariah 740.<br /> -</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_225_225" id="Footnote_225_225"></a><a href="#FNanchor_225_225"><span class="label">[225]</span></a> 2 Kings viii. 12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_226_226" id="Footnote_226_226"></a><a href="#FNanchor_226_226"><span class="label">[226]</span></a> Isa. xiii. 11-16; Hos. x. 14, xiii. 16; Nah. iii. 10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_227_227" id="Footnote_227_227"></a><a href="#FNanchor_227_227"><span class="label">[227]</span></a> Amos i. 3, 4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_228_228" id="Footnote_228_228"></a><a href="#FNanchor_228_228"><span class="label">[228]</span></a> Amos i. 6-15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_229_229" id="Footnote_229_229"></a><a href="#FNanchor_229_229"><span class="label">[229]</span></a> See <a href="#APPENDIX_I">Appendix I.</a>, Schrader, <i>Keilinschriften u. das Alte Test.</i>, -208 ff.; Sayce, <i>Records of the Past</i>, v. 41; Layard, <i>Nineveh</i>, p. 613; -Rawlinson, <i>Herodotus</i>, i. 469. He is twice mentioned in inscriptions -of Shalmaneser II. (861-825). He is called Ja-hu-a, son of Omri. -The name of Omri was familiar in Nineveh; for Ahab had fought as -a vassal of Assyria at the battle of Karkar, and Samaria was called -Beth-Khumri. Shalmaneser would not trouble himself with the -fact that Jehu had extirpated the old dynasty. His black stl was -found by Layard, and is figured in <i>Monuments of Nineveh</i>, i., pl. 53. -The name of Jehu was first deciphered by Dr. Hincks in 1851.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_230_230" id="Footnote_230_230"></a><a href="#FNanchor_230_230"><span class="label">[230]</span></a> Schrader (E. T.), ii. 199.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_231_231" id="Footnote_231_231"></a><a href="#FNanchor_231_231"><span class="label">[231]</span></a> Mic. vi. 16.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_232_232" id="Footnote_232_232"></a><a href="#FNanchor_232_232"><span class="label">[232]</span></a> 2 Kings xiii. 6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_233_233" id="Footnote_233_233"></a><a href="#FNanchor_233_233"><span class="label">[233]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxi. 2-4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_234_234" id="Footnote_234_234"></a><a href="#FNanchor_234_234"><span class="label">[234]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxi. 17.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_235_235" id="Footnote_235_235"></a><a href="#FNanchor_235_235"><span class="label">[235]</span></a> ὁμοπάτριος ἀδελφή (Jos.).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_236_236" id="Footnote_236_236"></a><a href="#FNanchor_236_236"><span class="label">[236]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxii. 11. There are undoubted difficulties about the -statement (see <i>infra</i>). There is no other instance of the marriage -of a princess with a priest.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_237_237" id="Footnote_237_237"></a><a href="#FNanchor_237_237"><span class="label">[237]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, IX. vii. 1: τὸ ταμιεῖον τῶν κλινῶν. The chamber of beds -was a sort of unoccupied wardrobe-room.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_238_238" id="Footnote_238_238"></a><a href="#FNanchor_238_238"><span class="label">[238]</span></a> 2 Kings xi. 4: "The centurions of the Carians and of the runners."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_239_239" id="Footnote_239_239"></a><a href="#FNanchor_239_239"><span class="label">[239]</span></a> This is the second time that the word "Sabbath" occurs, or that -the institution is alluded to, in the history of either monarchy.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_240_240" id="Footnote_240_240"></a><a href="#FNanchor_240_240"><span class="label">[240]</span></a> Nothing is known of סוּר, Sur, or יְסוֹד <i>y'sd</i>, the Foundation -(2 Chron. xxiii. 5). They are not mentioned elsewhere. LXX., εν τῇ -πύλῃ τῶν ὁδῶν, and (in Chronicles) ἐν τῇ πύλῃ τῇ μέσῃ.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_241_241" id="Footnote_241_241"></a><a href="#FNanchor_241_241"><span class="label">[241]</span></a> Not as in A.V., "that it be not broken down."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_242_242" id="Footnote_242_242"></a><a href="#FNanchor_242_242"><span class="label">[242]</span></a> In reading side by side the narratives in the Books of Kings and Chronicles (2 Chron. xxiii.), it is difficult to avoid the conclusion that -the main anxiety of the Chronicler is to leave the impression that the -work in the Temple was chiefly done by the Levites, and that the -sacred precincts were not polluted by the presence of alien troops. -He evidently stumbled at the notion, conveyed by the older narrative, -that Carians and suchlike semi-heathen mercenaries should have -stood by the altar at a high priest's command; so he substitutes -Levites for guardsmen, and the profane laymen are relegated outside. -In details the two accounts are only reconcilable by a special pleading -which would reconcile <i>any</i> discrepancy.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_243_243" id="Footnote_243_243"></a><a href="#FNanchor_243_243"><span class="label">[243]</span></a> 1 Kings vii. 21. Comp., however, 2 Kings xxiii. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_244_244" id="Footnote_244_244"></a><a href="#FNanchor_244_244"><span class="label">[244]</span></a> See Exod. xxv. 16, 21, xvi. 34. הָצֵדוּת (see 2 Chron. xxiii. 11). -Kimchi takes it to mean "a royal robe," and other Rabbis a phylactery -on the coronet (Deut. vi. 8). In the Targum to Chronicles -it is explained to mean the costly jewel (2 Sam. xii. 30), of which -none but a descendant of David could bear the weight. For <i>ha'edth</i> -Klostermann therefore suggests <i>hats'adth</i>, "the royal bracelets."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_245_245" id="Footnote_245_245"></a><a href="#FNanchor_245_245"><span class="label">[245]</span></a> So says Josephus (μετὰ τῆς ἰδίας στρατίας), and it is certain that -she would hardly go unattended.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_246_246" id="Footnote_246_246"></a><a href="#FNanchor_246_246"><span class="label">[246]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, IX. vii. 3: Τὸυς δὲ ἑπομένους ὁπλίτας εἶρξαν εἰσελθεῖν.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_247_247" id="Footnote_247_247"></a><a href="#FNanchor_247_247"><span class="label">[247]</span></a> The meaning of <i>al-ha'amd</i> is uncertain (A.V., "by a pillar"; -Vulg., "on the tribunal"). Comp. 2 Kings xxiii. 3; 2 Chron. xxiii. 13; -1 Kings viii. 22; 2 Chron. vi. 13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_248_248" id="Footnote_248_248"></a><a href="#FNanchor_248_248"><span class="label">[248]</span></a> 2 Kings xi. 15. Not as in A.V., "without the ranges." Heb., -<i>lash'drth</i>; LXX., ἔσωθεν τῶν σαδηρώθ.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_249_249" id="Footnote_249_249"></a><a href="#FNanchor_249_249"><span class="label">[249]</span></a> A.V., "And they laid hands on her"; LXX., ἐπέβαλον αὐτῃ -χεῖρας; Vulg., <i>imposuerunt ci manus</i>. But R.V. as in the text, following -the Targum, and the Jewish commentators, "They made for her -two sides."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_250_250" id="Footnote_250_250"></a><a href="#FNanchor_250_250"><span class="label">[250]</span></a> This is usually understood to be the "horse gate" of the city -(Neh. iii. 28), and so Josephus seems to have taken it, for he says -that Athaliah was killed in "the Kedron Valley." Canon Rawlinson -says that it was more probably in the Tyropœon Valley. But there -could have been no object in dragging the wretched queen all this -way. Jehoiada was only anxious that she should not stain the -Temple with her blood, and "the way by which the horses came into -the king's house" seems to be some private palace-gate. We are -expressly told (ver. 16) that Athaliah was slain "at the king's house," -probably in "the king's garden" (2 Kings xxv. 4).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_251_251" id="Footnote_251_251"></a><a href="#FNanchor_251_251"><span class="label">[251]</span></a> Wellhausen, <i>Isr. and Jud.</i>, p. 96.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_252_252" id="Footnote_252_252"></a><a href="#FNanchor_252_252"><span class="label">[252]</span></a> 2 Chron. xv. 9-15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_253_253" id="Footnote_253_253"></a><a href="#FNanchor_253_253"><span class="label">[253]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxix. 10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_254_254" id="Footnote_254_254"></a><a href="#FNanchor_254_254"><span class="label">[254]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxiv. 31.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_255_255" id="Footnote_255_255"></a><a href="#FNanchor_255_255"><span class="label">[255]</span></a> The name is perhaps an abbreviation from Mattan-Baal, "gift of -Baal." Comp. "Methumballes" (Plaut.). The names of Tyrian kings, -Mitinna, Mattun, occur in inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser II. See -Herod., vii. 98 (Bahr, <i>ad loc.</i>). "Methumbaal of Arvad" is mentioned -on a monument of Tiglath-Pileser II. (Schrader, ii. 249).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_256_256" id="Footnote_256_256"></a><a href="#FNanchor_256_256"><span class="label">[256]</span></a> 2 Kings xii. 10; Jer. xxix. 26; 2 Chron. xxiv. 6. Stanley, -<i>Lectures</i>, ii. 399.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_257_257" id="Footnote_257_257"></a><a href="#FNanchor_257_257"><span class="label">[257]</span></a> 2 Kings xii. 2. After "all his days," the R.V. and A.V. add -"<i>wherein</i> Jehoiada instructed him." This, however, is not accurate. -There is a stop at days, and "wherein" should be "<i>because</i>." There -seems, however, from the LXX., to be some variation in the text, and -according to the Chronicler Joash became an apostate. LXX., Πάσας -τὰς ἡμέρας ἅς ἐφώτιζεν αὐτὸν ὁ ἱερεύς; Vulg., <i>Cunctis diebus quibus -docuit eum Jojadas sacerdos</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_258_258" id="Footnote_258_258"></a><a href="#FNanchor_258_258"><span class="label">[258]</span></a> The Chronicler (2 Chron. xxiv. 1, 2) <i>more suo</i> copies 2 Kings -xii. 1, 2, but omits 3, because he dislikes the fact that not even his -hero Jehoiada had anything to say against the <i>bamoth</i>. But it -appears from 2 Kings xxiii. 9 that the <i>bamoth</i> had regular priests -of their own, who "eat the priestly portions" (according to an old -MS.) among their brethren.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_259_259" id="Footnote_259_259"></a><a href="#FNanchor_259_259"><span class="label">[259]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxiv. 7.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_260_260" id="Footnote_260_260"></a><a href="#FNanchor_260_260"><span class="label">[260]</span></a> 2 Kings xii. 4: "The money that every man is set at." Lit., -"Each the money of the souls of his valuation." Comp. Numb. xviii. -16; Lev. xxvii. 2.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_261_261" id="Footnote_261_261"></a><a href="#FNanchor_261_261"><span class="label">[261]</span></a> The Chronicler says "at the gate."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_262_262" id="Footnote_262_262"></a><a href="#FNanchor_262_262"><span class="label">[262]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxiv. 11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_263_263" id="Footnote_263_263"></a><a href="#FNanchor_263_263"><span class="label">[263]</span></a> Lev. v. 1-6, xiv. 13. "Trespass-money" is here first mentioned.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_264_264" id="Footnote_264_264"></a><a href="#FNanchor_264_264"><span class="label">[264]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxiv. 8-10. There is a difference between the historian -and the Chronicler respecting the vessels of the house.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_265_265" id="Footnote_265_265"></a><a href="#FNanchor_265_265"><span class="label">[265]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxiv. 15, 16. The statement of the Chronicler is -(as so often) surrounded by difficulties and improbabilities. If -Jehoiada was one hundred and thirty years old when he died, he -must have been ninety when Ahaziah was murdered, at the age of -twenty-three. But as Ahaziah was (apparently) born when his -father Jehoram was eighteen, Jehosheba must have been under -eighteen, and must have been married to a man seventy years -older than herself! See Lord Arthur Hervey, <i>On the Genealogies</i>, -p. 113.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_266_266" id="Footnote_266_266"></a><a href="#FNanchor_266_266"><span class="label">[266]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxiv. 27.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_267_267" id="Footnote_267_267"></a><a href="#FNanchor_267_267"><span class="label">[267]</span></a> Stanley charitably thinks that Joash may have only burst into -hasty words like those of Henry II. against Becket.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_268_268" id="Footnote_268_268"></a><a href="#FNanchor_268_268"><span class="label">[268]</span></a> The Chronicler says that "the <i>sons</i> of Jehoiada" had helped -to crown him, and that he put "the <i>sons</i> of Jehoiada" to death -(2 Chron. xxiii. 11, xxiv. 25).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_269_269" id="Footnote_269_269"></a><a href="#FNanchor_269_269"><span class="label">[269]</span></a> Gittin, f. 57, 2; Sanhedrin, f. 96, 2; Hershon, <i>Treasures of the -Talmud</i>, p. 276; Lightfoot on Matt. xxiii. 35. There can be little -doubt that the reading "Berechiah" is a later correction of some -one who remembered the murder narrated in Jos., <i>B. J.</i>, IV. v. 4, -and that the true reading is "son of Jehoiada." This is the last -murder of a prophet mentioned in the Old Testament, and we learn -from the Gospel the fact that he was slain "between the Temple -and the altar."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_270_270" id="Footnote_270_270"></a><a href="#FNanchor_270_270"><span class="label">[270]</span></a> Isa. xxiv. 2; Jer. v. 31, xxiii. 11; Ezek. vii. 26, xxii. 26; Hos. -iv. 9; Mic. iii. 11, etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_271_271" id="Footnote_271_271"></a><a href="#FNanchor_271_271"><span class="label">[271]</span></a> Jer. xxix. 24-32.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_272_272" id="Footnote_272_272"></a><a href="#FNanchor_272_272"><span class="label">[272]</span></a> 2 Kings ix. 11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_273_273" id="Footnote_273_273"></a><a href="#FNanchor_273_273"><span class="label">[273]</span></a> But from the Book of Kings we should not infer that there had -been any fighting at all. The Syrian commander had been bribed to -retire.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_274_274" id="Footnote_274_274"></a><a href="#FNanchor_274_274"><span class="label">[274]</span></a> We cannot understand the addition "on the way that goeth -down to Silla." Silla is nowhere else referred to.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_275_275" id="Footnote_275_275"></a><a href="#FNanchor_275_275"><span class="label">[275]</span></a> LXX., 2 Chron. xxiv. 27, καὶ οἱ υἱοὶ αὐτοῦ πάντες.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_276_276" id="Footnote_276_276"></a><a href="#FNanchor_276_276"><span class="label">[276]</span></a> Νήπιος ὃς πατέρα κτείνας υἱοὺς καταλείπει. Comp. Q. Curtius, vi. 11: -"Lege cautum erat ut propinqui eorum qui regi insidiati cum ipsis -necarentur." Cic., <i>Ad Brut.</i>, 15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_277_277" id="Footnote_277_277"></a><a href="#FNanchor_277_277"><span class="label">[277]</span></a> 2 Kings viii. 20-22.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_278_278" id="Footnote_278_278"></a><a href="#FNanchor_278_278"><span class="label">[278]</span></a> Amos i. 11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_279_279" id="Footnote_279_279"></a><a href="#FNanchor_279_279"><span class="label">[279]</span></a> The Valley (<i>G</i>) of Salt is "the plain of the Sabkah," about two -miles broad, between the southern end of the Dead Sea and the -hills which separate the Ghr from the Arabah (Seetzen, <i>Reisen</i>, ii. -356; Robinson, <i>Researches</i>, ii. 450, 488). David had won a great -victory there (2 Sam. viii. 13; Psalm lx., <i>title</i>).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_280_280" id="Footnote_280_280"></a><a href="#FNanchor_280_280"><span class="label">[280]</span></a> Selah, "a rock" (Πέτρα). Eusebius calls it Rekem.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_281_281" id="Footnote_281_281"></a><a href="#FNanchor_281_281"><span class="label">[281]</span></a> It is the name also of a city of Judah (Josh. xv. 38).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_282_282" id="Footnote_282_282"></a><a href="#FNanchor_282_282"><span class="label">[282]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxviii. 17; Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, XII. viii. 6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_283_283" id="Footnote_283_283"></a><a href="#FNanchor_283_283"><span class="label">[283]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxv. 5-10, 13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_284_284" id="Footnote_284_284"></a><a href="#FNanchor_284_284"><span class="label">[284]</span></a> Κατακρημνισμός. This mode of execution prevailed till quite -recent times in the little republic of Andorra.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_285_285" id="Footnote_285_285"></a><a href="#FNanchor_285_285"><span class="label">[285]</span></a> 2 Kings xiv. 17. The phrase that "he <i>lived</i> fifteen years" is -unusual, and seems to imply that the historian saw,— -</p> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"In more of life true life no more."<br /></span> -</div></div> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_286_286" id="Footnote_286_286"></a><a href="#FNanchor_286_286"><span class="label">[286]</span></a> Josh. x. 6, 31, xv. 39; 2 Kings xviii. 17; 2 Chron. xi. 9.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_287_287" id="Footnote_287_287"></a><a href="#FNanchor_287_287"><span class="label">[287]</span></a> I have not thought it worth while to unravel by a series of -uncertain conjectures the careless, and often self-contradictory, -synchronism of the reigns of the kings in the two kingdoms. The -compiler of these books evidently attached little or no importance to -accurate chronology. For instance, the data of 2 Kings xiii. 1, 10, -do not coincide; and instead of entering into tedious, doubtful, and confusing guesses, I have contented myself throughout with giving -for the reigns of the kings such dates, or approximate dates, as seem -to result from the several notices compared with the contemporary -annals of Assyria.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_288_288" id="Footnote_288_288"></a><a href="#FNanchor_288_288"><span class="label">[288]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxiv. 23.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_289_289" id="Footnote_289_289"></a><a href="#FNanchor_289_289"><span class="label">[289]</span></a> 2 Kings xiii. 4; "besought," literally "<i>stroked the face of</i>" -(1 Sam. xiii. 12; 1 Kings xiii. 6).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_290_290" id="Footnote_290_290"></a><a href="#FNanchor_290_290"><span class="label">[290]</span></a> The reference is usually explained of Jeroboam II.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_291_291" id="Footnote_291_291"></a><a href="#FNanchor_291_291"><span class="label">[291]</span></a> Comp. 2 Kings ii. 12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_292_292" id="Footnote_292_292"></a><a href="#FNanchor_292_292"><span class="label">[292]</span></a> Lit., "Make thine hand to ride upon thy bow." There is not the -slightest taint of belomancy in the story (comp. Ezek. xxi. 21), nor -does it allude to shooting an arrow into an enemy's country as a -declaration of war (Virg., <i>n.</i>, ix. 57).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_293_293" id="Footnote_293_293"></a><a href="#FNanchor_293_293"><span class="label">[293]</span></a> Aphek, a name of good omen (1 Kings xx. 26-30).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_294_294" id="Footnote_294_294"></a><a href="#FNanchor_294_294"><span class="label">[294]</span></a> Thrice. Comp. Num. xxii. 28; Exod. xxiii. 17, etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_295_295" id="Footnote_295_295"></a><a href="#FNanchor_295_295"><span class="label">[295]</span></a> LXX., ἐλυπήθη.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_296_296" id="Footnote_296_296"></a><a href="#FNanchor_296_296"><span class="label">[296]</span></a> See R.V., margin.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_297_297" id="Footnote_297_297"></a><a href="#FNanchor_297_297"><span class="label">[297]</span></a> <i>Antt.</i>, IX. viii. 6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_298_298" id="Footnote_298_298"></a><a href="#FNanchor_298_298"><span class="label">[298]</span></a> See Ecclus. xlviii. 13: "When he was dead, he prophesied in -the tomb." (But the clause may be spurious.)</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_299_299" id="Footnote_299_299"></a><a href="#FNanchor_299_299"><span class="label">[299]</span></a> Possibly some matrimonial proposal may have lain behind the -interchange of messages.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_300_300" id="Footnote_300_300"></a><a href="#FNanchor_300_300"><span class="label">[300]</span></a> Stade. For similar parables see Judg. ix. 8; Herod., i. 141; -Rawlinson, <i>Anc. Mon.</i>, iii. 226.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_301_301" id="Footnote_301_301"></a><a href="#FNanchor_301_301"><span class="label">[301]</span></a> Beth-Shemesh, "the house of the sun." It is mentioned in -1 Sam. vi. 9, 12, and was a priestly city, and one of Solomon's store-cities -(1 Kings iv. 9). It ultimately fell into the hands of the -Philistines (2 Chron. xxviii. 18). It is not the Beth-Shemesh of -Josh. xix. 22.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_302_302" id="Footnote_302_302"></a><a href="#FNanchor_302_302"><span class="label">[302]</span></a> Josephus says that this was the fault of Amaziah, whom Joash of -Israel threatened with death if Jerusalem resisted.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_303_303" id="Footnote_303_303"></a><a href="#FNanchor_303_303"><span class="label">[303]</span></a> This implies that at least half the northern wall was dismantled—the -wall towards Ephraim.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_304_304" id="Footnote_304_304"></a><a href="#FNanchor_304_304"><span class="label">[304]</span></a> Some have conjectured that Amaziah of Judah became more or -less the vassal of Joash of Israel, and that the vassalage continued -till after the death of Jeroboam II. (1) For Jeroboam II. held Elath -till his death, when Uzziah recovered it (2 Kings xiv. 22), and he -certainly could not have held this southern Judan port if Judah was -entirely independent; and (2) we read that Uzziah did not become -king at all till the <i>twenty-seventh</i> year of Jeroboam II. But if -Amaziah only survived Joash of Israel fifteen years (2 Kings xiv. 17), -Uzziah must have succeeded in the <i>fifteenth</i> year of Jeroboam. Is -the explanation to be found in the fact that up to that time—for -twelve years—Jeroboam did not allow the Judans to elect a king? -or are these among the hopeless confusion of synchronism which -cannot be reconciled at all with our present data?</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_305_305" id="Footnote_305_305"></a><a href="#FNanchor_305_305"><span class="label">[305]</span></a> 2 Kings xiv. 25-27. There are other allusions to the historic -events in 2 Kings x. 32, 33, xiii. 3-7, 22-25. Hitzig conjectures -that Isa. xv., xvi., are "a burden of Moab" quoted from Jonah.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_306_306" id="Footnote_306_306"></a><a href="#FNanchor_306_306"><span class="label">[306]</span></a> 2 Kings xiii. 5, "The Lord gave Israel a saviour"; xiv. 27, -"And He saved them by the hand of Jeroboam, the son of Joash." -Some suppose the saviour to be the Assyrian King.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_307_307" id="Footnote_307_307"></a><a href="#FNanchor_307_307"><span class="label">[307]</span></a> It had owned the feudal supremacy of David (2 Sam. viii. 6), and -Ahab had extorted the privilege of having bazaars there (1 Kings -xx. 34). Considering how immense had been the resources of -Damascus (2 Kings vi. 14), which had once been able to send to -battle twelve thousand war-chariots (<i>Eponym Canon</i>, p. 108) under -Benhadad, we see how fearfully the Syrian capital must have been -weakened.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_308_308" id="Footnote_308_308"></a><a href="#FNanchor_308_308"><span class="label">[308]</span></a> If Isa. xv. 1, 2, refers to this invasion of Jeroboam II., as Hitzig -first conjectured, we infer that he had taken both Ar of Moab -(Rabbath) and Kir of Moab, a strong fortress on a hill, by night -assaults; and that he had also captured Dibon, Nebo, and Medeba, -and inflicted on them summary chastisement. It appears that the Moabites had advanced northwards from the Arnon, while Hazael -occupied Ramoth-Gilead, and had seized part of the tribe of Reuben. -Jeroboam II. first expelled them, and then invaded their own proper -country. Hitzig conjectures that Isa. xv., xvi., are really an old -prophecy—perhaps by Jonah, son of Amittai—which Isaiah quotes, and -to which he adds two verses (Isa. xvi. 12, 13). In such overthrow -Moab must have learnt to be ashamed of Chemosh (Jer. xlviii. 13).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_309_309" id="Footnote_309_309"></a><a href="#FNanchor_309_309"><span class="label">[309]</span></a> Isa. xv. 7; Amos vi. 14.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_310_310" id="Footnote_310_310"></a><a href="#FNanchor_310_310"><span class="label">[310]</span></a> Amos vi. 2.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_311_311" id="Footnote_311_311"></a><a href="#FNanchor_311_311"><span class="label">[311]</span></a> Merchandise had hitherto been considered discreditable for a pure -Jew, so that a trader is called a Canaanite (Hos. xii. 7, 8).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_312_312" id="Footnote_312_312"></a><a href="#FNanchor_312_312"><span class="label">[312]</span></a> See the writer's <i>Minor Prophets</i> ("Men of the Bible" Series), pp. -231-243.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_313_313" id="Footnote_313_313"></a><a href="#FNanchor_313_313"><span class="label">[313]</span></a> Amos vii. 1. Famine (iv. 6); drought (iv. 7, 8); yellow blight -and locusts (iv. 9); pestilence (iv. 10); earthquake and burning (iv. 11).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_314_314" id="Footnote_314_314"></a><a href="#FNanchor_314_314"><span class="label">[314]</span></a> Amos vii. 4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_315_315" id="Footnote_315_315"></a><a href="#FNanchor_315_315"><span class="label">[315]</span></a> Amos i. 1, iii. 14, iv. 11, viii 8; Zech. xiv. 5: "Ye shall flee like -as ye fled before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah." Josephus -says that in an earthquake a little before the birth of Christ ten -thousand were buried under the ruined houses (<i>Antt.</i>, XV. v. 2), -and he has many Rabbinic haggadoth to tell us about the earthquake, -which, he says, happened at the moment when Uzziah burnt incense -in the Temple (<i>Antt.</i>, IX. x. 4).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_316_316" id="Footnote_316_316"></a><a href="#FNanchor_316_316"><span class="label">[316]</span></a> According to Hind, they took place on June 15th, <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 763, and -February 9th, <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 784. Amos alludes to the capture of Gath by -Uzziah, of Calneh (<i>Ktesiphon</i>), and of Hamath (vi. 2; 2 Chron. xxvi. 6). -Gath henceforth disappears from the Philistian Pentapolis (Amos i. 7, 8; -Zeph. ii. 4; Zech. ix. 5).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_317_317" id="Footnote_317_317"></a><a href="#FNanchor_317_317"><span class="label">[317]</span></a> Or "dresser of sycomore-trees" (R.V.). LXX., κνίζων συκάμινα; -Vulg., <i>vellicans sycomoros</i>. The sycomore-fruit (fruit of the <i>Ficus -sycomorus</i>, or wild fig) is ripened by puncturing it (Theoph., -<i>H. Plant.</i>, iv. 2; Pliny, <i>H. N.</i>, xiii. 14).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_318_318" id="Footnote_318_318"></a><a href="#FNanchor_318_318"><span class="label">[318]</span></a> The well-known town of Tekoa had been Solomon's horse-fair, -and had been fortified by Rehoboam (2 Chron. xi. 6). It lay in a wild -country six miles south of Bethlehem (2 Chron. xx. 20; 1 Macc. ix. 33; -Robinson, <i>Bibl. Res.</i>, i. 486). For a fuller account of these prophets, -I must refer to my book on <i>The Minor Prophets</i> in the "Men of the -Bible" Series. It has always been assumed that Amos belonged to -the well-known Tekoa, and was therefore a subject of the Southern -Kingdom. In recent days this has become uncertain. No sycomores -grow or can grow on the bleak uplands of Tekoa (Tristram, <i>Nat. Hist. -of the Bible</i>, p. 397); so that Jerome, in his preface to Amos, thinks -that "brambles" are intended. Even Kimchi conjectured that Tekoa -was an unknown town in the tribe of Asher. Amos's allusions to -scenery are all applicable to the Northern landscape.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_319_319" id="Footnote_319_319"></a><a href="#FNanchor_319_319"><span class="label">[319]</span></a> Amos i. 1-ii. 5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_320_320" id="Footnote_320_320"></a><a href="#FNanchor_320_320"><span class="label">[320]</span></a> Amos ii. 6-13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_321_321" id="Footnote_321_321"></a><a href="#FNanchor_321_321"><span class="label">[321]</span></a> Amos iii. 9-15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_322_322" id="Footnote_322_322"></a><a href="#FNanchor_322_322"><span class="label">[322]</span></a> Amos iv. 1-13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_323_323" id="Footnote_323_323"></a><a href="#FNanchor_323_323"><span class="label">[323]</span></a> This title, "Jehovah-Tsebaoth," now begins to occur. It is not -found in the Hexateuch. It probably means "Lord of the <i>starry -hosts</i>." Contact with Assyria first made the Israelites acquainted with star-worship. Amos alludes to the Pleiades and Orion (v. 8: -comp. Job ix. 9, xxxviii. 31). Star-worship is forbidden in Deuteronomy. -In Amos v. 26 the true meaning is that the Israelites <i>would -take with them, on their road to exile</i>, Sakkuth (Moloch?) and Kewan -(the god-star Saturn).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_324_324" id="Footnote_324_324"></a><a href="#FNanchor_324_324"><span class="label">[324]</span></a> Amos vi. 1-14.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_325_325" id="Footnote_325_325"></a><a href="#FNanchor_325_325"><span class="label">[325]</span></a> Amos vii. 1-9.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_326_326" id="Footnote_326_326"></a><a href="#FNanchor_326_326"><span class="label">[326]</span></a> Strange as it may seem, the early authority for the existence of -any calf at Dan is very slight, and the extreme uncertainty of the -reading and interpretation in one main passage (1 Kings xii. 32) -makes it at least possible that there were <i>two calves at Bethel</i>, and that at Dan there was no calf, but only the old idolatrous ephod of Micah, -still served by the servant of Moses. See additional note at the end -of the volume.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_327_327" id="Footnote_327_327"></a><a href="#FNanchor_327_327"><span class="label">[327]</span></a> Amos iii. 2.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_328_328" id="Footnote_328_328"></a><a href="#FNanchor_328_328"><span class="label">[328]</span></a> That the chief priest of Bethel bore the name "Jehovah is -strong" shows once more that "calf-worship" was in no sense a -<i>substitute</i> for the worship of Jehovah.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_329_329" id="Footnote_329_329"></a><a href="#FNanchor_329_329"><span class="label">[329]</span></a> This was not quite accurate; he had rather prophesied the -devastation of the high places (vii. 9). In fact, his words had often -been very vague. "<i>Thus</i> will I do unto thee" (iv. 12).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_330_330" id="Footnote_330_330"></a><a href="#FNanchor_330_330"><span class="label">[330]</span></a> Amos ix. 11-15. Comp. Hos. iii. 5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_331_331" id="Footnote_331_331"></a><a href="#FNanchor_331_331"><span class="label">[331]</span></a> The exaggerated haggadoth of later days say that Amaziah had -Amos beaten with leaded thongs, and that he was carried home in a -dying state (Epiphan., <i>Opp.</i>, ii. 145), to which there is a supposed -allusion in Heb. xi. 35: ἄλλοι δὲ ἐτυμπανίσθησαν.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_332_332" id="Footnote_332_332"></a><a href="#FNanchor_332_332"><span class="label">[332]</span></a> We cannot be sure that the term "Seer" was meant to be -contemptuous, although from 1 Sam. ix. 9 we should infer that the -title had become somewhat obsolete. Further, we must bear in mind -that it may not have been always easy for worldlings to distinguish -between true prophets and the unprincipled pretenders who, about -this time, succeeded in making the name and aspect of a prophet -so complete a disgrace that men had carefully to disclaim it (Zech. -xiii. 2-6). It is true that the heading of Amos (i. 1), which may not, -however, be by the prophet himself, tells us of "the words which he -<i>saw</i>" (<i>i.e.</i>, spoke as a seer), and he also disclaims the name of -prophet (vii. 14).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_333_333" id="Footnote_333_333"></a><a href="#FNanchor_333_333"><span class="label">[333]</span></a> Amos viii. 1-ix. 9, 10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_334_334" id="Footnote_334_334"></a><a href="#FNanchor_334_334"><span class="label">[334]</span></a> Amos ix. 11-15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_335_335" id="Footnote_335_335"></a><a href="#FNanchor_335_335"><span class="label">[335]</span></a> Hos. iv. 15-19.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_336_336" id="Footnote_336_336"></a><a href="#FNanchor_336_336"><span class="label">[336]</span></a> Hos. v. 13, vii. 11, viii. 9, ix. 3-6, xi. 5, xii. 1, xiv. 3. It -must be borne in mind that the cuneiform inscriptions prove that -Assyria had burst into sight like a lurid comet on the horizon far -earlier than we had supposed. Jehu had paid tribute to Shalmaneser -as far back as <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 842, more than a century before Menahem's -tribute in 738. The destruction which Hosea prophesied took place -within thirty-one years of his prophecies—probably in <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 722, -when Sargon finished the siege of Samaria begun by Shalmaneser. -The king Hoshea was perhaps taken captive before the siege.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_337_337" id="Footnote_337_337"></a><a href="#FNanchor_337_337"><span class="label">[337]</span></a> Hos. viii. 5, ix. 15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_338_338" id="Footnote_338_338"></a><a href="#FNanchor_338_338"><span class="label">[338]</span></a> Hos. x. 13, 14.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_339_339" id="Footnote_339_339"></a><a href="#FNanchor_339_339"><span class="label">[339]</span></a> Hos. vi. 9: for "by consent" read "towards Shechem."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_340_340" id="Footnote_340_340"></a><a href="#FNanchor_340_340"><span class="label">[340]</span></a> Hos. vii. 3-7. The allusions are vague, but we see a drunken -king among his drunken princes, surrounded by wicked plotters who -have flattered his vices. He is ignorant of his peril. The subjects -aid the rulers in these abominations. All are blazing, like an oven, -with passion and infamy, and only rest (as the baker does) to acquire -new strength for inflaming their burning desires. At the dawn their -treachery blazes into the crime of murder, and in the wine-sick fever-heat -of the banquet the king is murdered by his corrupt intimates -(see my <i>Minor Prophets</i>, p. 78).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_341_341" id="Footnote_341_341"></a><a href="#FNanchor_341_341"><span class="label">[341]</span></a> Wellhausen, <i>Isr. and Jud.</i>, 85.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_342_342" id="Footnote_342_342"></a><a href="#FNanchor_342_342"><span class="label">[342]</span></a> Hence, perhaps, the expression that the people "took him." If -Amaziah died at fifty-nine, he probably had other sons.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_343_343" id="Footnote_343_343"></a><a href="#FNanchor_343_343"><span class="label">[343]</span></a> Compare the interchange of the names Azariel and Uzziel (Exod. -vi. 18) in 1 Chron. vi. 2, 18. Azariah means "Jehovah hath helped," -and Uzziah "Strength of Jehovah." It is just possible that his name -was changed at his accession, as the chief priest also was named -Azariah, and confusion might otherwise have arisen.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_344_344" id="Footnote_344_344"></a><a href="#FNanchor_344_344"><span class="label">[344]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxvi. 2-15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_345_345" id="Footnote_345_345"></a><a href="#FNanchor_345_345"><span class="label">[345]</span></a> Isa. xiv. 29. A mixed language arose in this district in consequence -(Neh. xiii. 24; Zech. ix. 6). The word Palestine only applies -strictly to the district of Philistia. Milton uses it, with his usual -accuracy, in the description of Dagon as -</p> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i0">"That twice-battered god of Palestine."<br /></span> -</div></div> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_346_346" id="Footnote_346_346"></a><a href="#FNanchor_346_346"><span class="label">[346]</span></a> Uzziah's opposition to Assyria—of which there seems to be no -doubt, for he must be the Azrijahu of the <i>Eponym Canon</i>—took place -about 738, and was a coalition movement. But it gives rise to great -chronological and other difficulties. As the solution of these is at -present only conjectural, I refer to Schrader (E. Tr.), ii. 211-219. He -is called Azrijahu Jahudai.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_347_347" id="Footnote_347_347"></a><a href="#FNanchor_347_347"><span class="label">[347]</span></a> 2 Kings xv. 5 (2 Chron. xxvi. 21, "a house of sickness"). LXX., -ἐν οἴκῳ ἀφφουσώθ; Vulg., <i>in domo libera seorsim</i>. Comp Lev. xiii. -46. Theodoret understands it that he was shut up privately in -his own palace: ἔνδον ἐν θαλάμῳ ὑπ' οὐδένος ὁρώμενος. Symmachus, -ἐγκεκλεισμένος.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_348_348" id="Footnote_348_348"></a><a href="#FNanchor_348_348"><span class="label">[348]</span></a> His misfortune must have made a deep impression, and is possibly -alluded to in Hos. iv. 4: "For thy people are as they that strive with -the priest."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_349_349" id="Footnote_349_349"></a><a href="#FNanchor_349_349"><span class="label">[349]</span></a> The Chronicler attributes the good part of his reign to the influence -of an unknown Zechariah, "who had understanding in the -visions of God"; and says that when Zechariah died Uzziah altered -for the worse.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_350_350" id="Footnote_350_350"></a><a href="#FNanchor_350_350"><span class="label">[350]</span></a> This high priest, Azariah, is only mentioned elsewhere in -2 Chron. xxvi. 17, 20.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_351_351" id="Footnote_351_351"></a><a href="#FNanchor_351_351"><span class="label">[351]</span></a> Josephus says that he had put on a priestly robe, and that a great -feast was going on, and that the earthquake (Amos i. 1; Zech. xiv. 5) -happened at the moment, which broke the Temple roof, so that a -sunbeam smote his head and produced the leprosy. We here see -the growth of the Haggadah.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_352_352" id="Footnote_352_352"></a><a href="#FNanchor_352_352"><span class="label">[352]</span></a> For instance, two verses earlier (2 Kings xv. 30) we read of the -twentieth year of Jotham.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_353_353" id="Footnote_353_353"></a><a href="#FNanchor_353_353"><span class="label">[353]</span></a> Isa. i. 10-17.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_354_354" id="Footnote_354_354"></a><a href="#FNanchor_354_354"><span class="label">[354]</span></a> Amos viii. 2.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_355_355" id="Footnote_355_355"></a><a href="#FNanchor_355_355"><span class="label">[355]</span></a> Amos iv. 1-3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_356_356" id="Footnote_356_356"></a><a href="#FNanchor_356_356"><span class="label">[356]</span></a> It is probable that our present Book of Zechariah is composed of -the works of three prophets of different dates, each of whom may -have borne that name. See my <i>Minor Prophets</i> ("Men of the Bible" -Series).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_357_357" id="Footnote_357_357"></a><a href="#FNanchor_357_357"><span class="label">[357]</span></a> Zech. xi. 8. In 2 Kings xv. 10 the LXX. read καὶ επάταξεν αὐτὸν -ἐν κεβλαάμ; and Ewald thinks that "before the people" (קָבָל־צָם) -is really a proper name of the third king in one month—"and -<i>Kobolam</i> slew him." There is insufficient ground for this; though a -similar name is found in Assyrian records.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_358_358" id="Footnote_358_358"></a><a href="#FNanchor_358_358"><span class="label">[358]</span></a> Hos. viii. 3, vii. 7.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_359_359" id="Footnote_359_359"></a><a href="#FNanchor_359_359"><span class="label">[359]</span></a> Zachariah, Shallum, Kobolam (?).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_360_360" id="Footnote_360_360"></a><a href="#FNanchor_360_360"><span class="label">[360]</span></a> Zech. xi. 1-17 (Heb. 13).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_361_361" id="Footnote_361_361"></a><a href="#FNanchor_361_361"><span class="label">[361]</span></a> That this was Thapsacus on the Euphrates (1 Kings iv. 24), and -that Menahem was in a position to march northward three hundred -miles, and offer so deadly and wanton an insult to the might of -Assyria, is out of the question. The name means "a ford," and -might apply to any town on a river. Thenius thinks the name is a -clerical error for <i>Tappuach</i>, between Ephraim and Manasseh (Josh. -xvii. 7, 8).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_362_362" id="Footnote_362_362"></a><a href="#FNanchor_362_362"><span class="label">[362]</span></a> Josephus says, ὠμότητος ὑπερβολὴν οὐ καταλιπὼν οὐδὲ ἀγριότητος. -It is said that the same crime was committed in 1861 by a Mexican -bandit. Machiavelli says, "He who violently and without just right -usurps a crown must use cruelty, if cruelty becomes necessary, once -for all" (<i>De princ.</i>, 8).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_363_363" id="Footnote_363_363"></a><a href="#FNanchor_363_363"><span class="label">[363]</span></a> 2 Kings viii. 12; Hos. xiii. 16.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_364_364" id="Footnote_364_364"></a><a href="#FNanchor_364_364"><span class="label">[364]</span></a> Amos i. 13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_365_365" id="Footnote_365_365"></a><a href="#FNanchor_365_365"><span class="label">[365]</span></a> Hos. x. 14. This allusion is, however, uncertain. Shalmaneser III. -is not elsewhere found abbreviated into Shalman. Some suppose -him to be a Moabitish king, Salamannu, who was a vassal of Tiglath-Pileser. -The LXX., Vulg., etc., identify him with the Zalmunna of -Judg. viii. 18. Psalm lxxxiii. 11 renders the word <i>ex domo ejus qui -judicavit Baal</i> (<i>i.e.</i>, Gideon). Beth-Arbel is either Arbela in Galilee, -or Irbid, north-east of Pella.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_366_366" id="Footnote_366_366"></a><a href="#FNanchor_366_366"><span class="label">[366]</span></a> Nah. iii. 10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_367_367" id="Footnote_367_367"></a><a href="#FNanchor_367_367"><span class="label">[367]</span></a> Isa. xiii. 16.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_368_368" id="Footnote_368_368"></a><a href="#FNanchor_368_368"><span class="label">[368]</span></a> The two predecessors of Tiglath-Pileser (<i>Tuklat-abal-isarra</i>) were -Assurdayan and Assurnirari.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_369_369" id="Footnote_369_369"></a><a href="#FNanchor_369_369"><span class="label">[369]</span></a> Isa. v. 26-29.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_370_370" id="Footnote_370_370"></a><a href="#FNanchor_370_370"><span class="label">[370]</span></a> Comp. Job xx. 15; Ruth ii. 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_371_371" id="Footnote_371_371"></a><a href="#FNanchor_371_371"><span class="label">[371]</span></a> Hos. v. 11-13. Comp. x. 6: "It [Samaria] shall be carried to Assyria -for a present unto King Jareb." Sayce (<i>Bab. and Orient. Records</i>, -December 1887) thinks that Jareb may have been the original name -of Sargon, and so too Neubauer, <i>Zeitschr. fr Assyr.</i>, 1886. The -Vulg. renders King Jareb <i>ad regem ultorem</i>, and so too Symmachus. -Aquila and Theodotion have δικαζόμενον. It may be the name of -an unknown king of Assyria, or of Pul, or of Sargon—R.V., margin, -"a king that should contend."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_372_372" id="Footnote_372_372"></a><a href="#FNanchor_372_372"><span class="label">[372]</span></a> Hos. vii. 8-12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_373_373" id="Footnote_373_373"></a><a href="#FNanchor_373_373"><span class="label">[373]</span></a> Josephus says, τῇ τοῦ πατρὸς ἀκολουθήσας ὠμότητι.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_374_374" id="Footnote_374_374"></a><a href="#FNanchor_374_374"><span class="label">[374]</span></a> 2 Kings xv. 25, A.V., "in the palace of the king's house" -(<i>armon</i>), rather "fortress." For the character of the Gileadites see -1 Chron. xii. 8, xxvi. 31.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_375_375" id="Footnote_375_375"></a><a href="#FNanchor_375_375"><span class="label">[375]</span></a> The length of Pekah's reign is most doubtful. If the periods -assigned to the reigns in the Northern and Southern Kingdoms be -added together up to the Fall of Samaria in the sixth year of -Hezekiah (2 Kings xviii. 9, 10), it will be found that the Southern -chronology is twenty years longer than the Northern. G. Smith -would alter the text, and make Jeroboam II. reign fifty-one years and -Pekah thirty years; others invent an interregnum of eleven years -between Jeroboam II. and Zachariah, and an anarchy of nine years -before Hoshea's accession; others shorten Pekah's reign to <i>one</i> -year.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_376_376" id="Footnote_376_376"></a><a href="#FNanchor_376_376"><span class="label">[376]</span></a> 2 Kings xv. 37.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_377_377" id="Footnote_377_377"></a><a href="#FNanchor_377_377"><span class="label">[377]</span></a> Vide <i>infra</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_378_378" id="Footnote_378_378"></a><a href="#FNanchor_378_378"><span class="label">[378]</span></a> Deut. xxxiii. 19: "They [Zebulon] shall call the peoples unto -the mountain: there shall they offer the sacrifices of righteousness."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_379_379" id="Footnote_379_379"></a><a href="#FNanchor_379_379"><span class="label">[379]</span></a> Isa. viii. 6, 7.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_380_380" id="Footnote_380_380"></a><a href="#FNanchor_380_380"><span class="label">[380]</span></a> Perhaps we should read Edomites (2 Kings xvi. 6).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_381_381" id="Footnote_381_381"></a><a href="#FNanchor_381_381"><span class="label">[381]</span></a> The bar of its city gate.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_382_382" id="Footnote_382_382"></a><a href="#FNanchor_382_382"><span class="label">[382]</span></a> Bikath-Aven—"The cleft of Aven"—Cœle Syria, or Hollow Syria, still called by the Arabs El-Bukāa. Comp. Josh. xi. 17, xii. 7. -Aven—or "Vanity"—is perhaps Heliopolis or Baalbek. Comp. Ezek. -xxx. 17.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_383_383" id="Footnote_383_383"></a><a href="#FNanchor_383_383"><span class="label">[383]</span></a> Perhaps Beit el Jame, "House of Paradise"—about eight hours -from Damascus (Porter, <i>Five Years in Syria</i>, i. 313).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_384_384" id="Footnote_384_384"></a><a href="#FNanchor_384_384"><span class="label">[384]</span></a> Kir, in Armenia—the land of their origin (Amos ix. 7).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_385_385" id="Footnote_385_385"></a><a href="#FNanchor_385_385"><span class="label">[385]</span></a> But, after all, was there a golden calf at Dan? It is scarcely ever -alluded to, and the notion that there was one may have arisen (1) from -a corruption or mistaken rendering of the text in 1 Kings xii. 29, and -(2) from the existence there of the idolatrous ephod. See Klostermann, -<i>ad loc.</i>; Isa. ix. 8-17.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_386_386" id="Footnote_386_386"></a><a href="#FNanchor_386_386"><span class="label">[386]</span></a> LXX., Ἀποτρίψαι τὸν μόσχον σοῦ, Σαμάρεια; Vulg., <i>Projectus est -vitulus tuus, Samaria</i>. Orelli renders it, "Abscheulich ist dein Kalb, -O Samaria." In Jer. xlvi. 15 we read (of Egypt), "Why is thy strong -one swept away?" where the true reading may be, "Hath Khaph [<i>i.e.</i>, -Apis], thy chosen one, fled?" LXX., Ἆπις ὁ μόσχος σοῦ, ὁ ἐκλεκτός. So -Amos had prophesied that the "god of Dan" and the "way of -Beersheba" should fall for evermore (Amos viii. 14).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_387_387" id="Footnote_387_387"></a><a href="#FNanchor_387_387"><span class="label">[387]</span></a> Isa. ix. 11-16. With this passage comp. 2 Kings xxiii. 5; Zeph. -i. 4; Hos. vii. 9, 10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_388_388" id="Footnote_388_388"></a><a href="#FNanchor_388_388"><span class="label">[388]</span></a> Tiglath-Pileser says: "Pakaha, their king, I killed: Ausi [Hoshea] -I placed over them. The distant land of Bit-Khumri [the "house of -Omri"]—<i>the whole of its inhabitants</i>, with their goods—I carried away -to Asshur" (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 734). In this year he mentions Ahaz among his -tributaries.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_389_389" id="Footnote_389_389"></a><a href="#FNanchor_389_389"><span class="label">[389]</span></a> Hos. iv. 4; v. 1, "Hear ye this, O priests ... ye have been a -snare on Mizpah," etc.; vi. 9, "The company of the priests murder by -the way to Shechem."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_390_390" id="Footnote_390_390"></a><a href="#FNanchor_390_390"><span class="label">[390]</span></a> Hos. x. 10 (so R.V., and in the main the versions after the -Hebrew margin). LXX., ἐν τῷ παιδεύεσθαι αὐτοὺς ἐν ταῖς δύσιν ἀδικίαις -αὐτῶν; Vulg., "<i>cum corripientur propter duas iniquitates suas</i>"; A.V., -"When they shall bind themselves in their two furrows." I believe -that the "<i>two</i> iniquities" may mean <i>two</i> cherubs at Bethel. See -x. 15: "So shall Bethel do unto you because of the evil of your evil."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_391_391" id="Footnote_391_391"></a><a href="#FNanchor_391_391"><span class="label">[391]</span></a> Hos. xi. 8-11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_392_392" id="Footnote_392_392"></a><a href="#FNanchor_392_392"><span class="label">[392]</span></a> 2 Kings xvii. 1 is inconsistent with xv. 30, 33, and it is wholly -useless for our purpose to enter into complicated chronological hypotheses, -every one of which may be erroneous.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_393_393" id="Footnote_393_393"></a><a href="#FNanchor_393_393"><span class="label">[393]</span></a> Schrader, <i>K. A. T.</i>, p. 255.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_394_394" id="Footnote_394_394"></a><a href="#FNanchor_394_394"><span class="label">[394]</span></a> <i>Seder Olam</i>, xxii. 2; 2 Chron. xxx. 6-11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_395_395" id="Footnote_395_395"></a><a href="#FNanchor_395_395"><span class="label">[395]</span></a> See Herod., ii. 137; called So (Heb., S or Seve) in 2 Kings -xvii. 4. Perhaps Shebek, the founder of the twenty-fifth dynasty. -LXX., Σηγώρ; Vulg., <i>Sua</i>; Manetho, <i>Sabachon</i>. In the <i>Eponym Canon</i> -he is called an Egyptian general, <i>Sibakhi</i>, who helped Gaza against -Assyria, and was defeated. The <i>ka</i> appended at the end of his name -(Egyptian Shaba-ka) is thought by some to be the Cushite article. -The race of the priest Hirhor died out with Piankhi, and the -Ethiopians elected a noble named Kashta. Shabak was his son. -He conquered Sais, and burnt his rival Bek-en-raut alive (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 724). -His dynasty ruled for fifty years; he was succeeded by Sevechus -(Shabatok), and he by Tehrak (Tirhakah).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_396_396" id="Footnote_396_396"></a><a href="#FNanchor_396_396"><span class="label">[396]</span></a> His name means "Salmn, pardon." We have no monuments or -inscriptions of this king; only an imperial weight.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_397_397" id="Footnote_397_397"></a><a href="#FNanchor_397_397"><span class="label">[397]</span></a> Mic. v. 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_398_398" id="Footnote_398_398"></a><a href="#FNanchor_398_398"><span class="label">[398]</span></a> Hos. xiii. 13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_399_399" id="Footnote_399_399"></a><a href="#FNanchor_399_399"><span class="label">[399]</span></a> Hos. xiii. 7-11. The prophecy is rhythmic, though not written in -actual poetry.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_400_400" id="Footnote_400_400"></a><a href="#FNanchor_400_400"><span class="label">[400]</span></a> Till the discovery of the Assyrian records, Sargon (Sharru-knu, -'the faithful king') was but a name. The Jews knew but little of him. He is but once mentioned in Scripture (Isa. xx. 1), and was -probably confused by some Jews with other kings. Yet he reigned -sixteen years (722-705), and his records give the annals of fifteen -campaigns. In 720 he crushed a confederacy headed by Yahubid of -Hamath, and reduced that city to a "heap of ruins." He then -advanced against Hanno, King of Gaza, who was in alliance with -Sabaco, and defeated the combined forces of the Philistines and -Egyptians at Raphia, half-way between Gaza and the Wady-el-Arsh, -"the torrent [<i>nachal</i>] of Egypt." Sargon was at the time too much -occupied with other enemies to pursue his advantage over Egypt; for -Armenia, Media, and other countries needed his attention. This -encouraged Ashdod to rebel, and its king, Azuri, refused his tribute -(see Isa. xx. 1). Sargon deposed him, and put his brother Ahimit in -his place. Relying on Egyptian promises, Philistia joined Judah, -Edom, and Moab in defying Assyria. They deposed Ahimit as an -Assyrian nominee, and put Yaman in his place. Egypt, as usual, failed -to help, and in 711 the Assyrian Turtan, or Commander-in-chief, took -Ashdod after three years' resistance, and carried its people into -captivity. The punishment of Egypt was reserved for the subsequent -reigns of Esarhaddon (681-668) and Assurbanipal. See Driver's -<i>Isaiah xlv.</i> (Isa. xx.). Isa. xiv. 29-32 is an ode of triumph for the -Fall of Philistia.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_401_401" id="Footnote_401_401"></a><a href="#FNanchor_401_401"><span class="label">[401]</span></a> Hos. xiii. 16.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_402_402" id="Footnote_402_402"></a><a href="#FNanchor_402_402"><span class="label">[402]</span></a> See De Hincks in <i>Journ. of Sacr. Lit.</i>, October 1858; Layard, -<i>Nin. and Bab.</i>, i. 148.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_403_403" id="Footnote_403_403"></a><a href="#FNanchor_403_403"><span class="label">[403]</span></a> Isa. xxviii. 1-4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_404_404" id="Footnote_404_404"></a><a href="#FNanchor_404_404"><span class="label">[404]</span></a> 2 Kings xvii. 13, "by all the prophets, and all the <i>seers</i>," (<i>chseh</i>). -Hāvernick thinks that the <i>nebi'm</i> were such <i>officially</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_405_405" id="Footnote_405_405"></a><a href="#FNanchor_405_405"><span class="label">[405]</span></a> See Amos ii. 4, 5; Isa. xxviii. 15; Jer. xvi. 19, 20; Ezek. -xx. 13-30, etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_406_406" id="Footnote_406_406"></a><a href="#FNanchor_406_406"><span class="label">[406]</span></a> Deut. xxvi. 5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_407_407" id="Footnote_407_407"></a><a href="#FNanchor_407_407"><span class="label">[407]</span></a> Isa. xli. 14.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_408_408" id="Footnote_408_408"></a><a href="#FNanchor_408_408"><span class="label">[408]</span></a> Hos. xi. 9.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_409_409" id="Footnote_409_409"></a><a href="#FNanchor_409_409"><span class="label">[409]</span></a> See my <i>Minor Prophets</i>, 6-97.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_410_410" id="Footnote_410_410"></a><a href="#FNanchor_410_410"><span class="label">[410]</span></a> Not as in A.V., "Habor, <i>by</i> the river of Gozan."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_411_411" id="Footnote_411_411"></a><a href="#FNanchor_411_411"><span class="label">[411]</span></a> 2 Kings xvii. 6. The LXX. has "rivers" and "mountains": -ἐν Ἀλαὲ καὶ ἐν Ἀβὼρ ποταμοῖς Γωζὰν καὶ ὅρη Μήδων. The river is not -Ezekiel's Chebar. These deportations <i>en masse</i> of a whole population, -with their women and children, their waggons and flocks, are depicted -on Sargon's series of tablets in his splendid palace at Khorsabad.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_412_412" id="Footnote_412_412"></a><a href="#FNanchor_412_412"><span class="label">[412]</span></a> Ezra iv. 10. "The great and noble Asnapper" of the passage -is either some Assyrian general, or a confusion of the name -Assurbanipal.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_413_413" id="Footnote_413_413"></a><a href="#FNanchor_413_413"><span class="label">[413]</span></a> 2 Kings xvii. 9. Heb., "covered"; A.V. and R.V., "did secretly," -rather "perfidiously"; LXX., ἠμφιέσαντο λόγους ἀδίκους κατὰ κύριον; -Vulg., <i>Et offenderunt verbis non rectis dominum suum</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_414_414" id="Footnote_414_414"></a><a href="#FNanchor_414_414"><span class="label">[414]</span></a> Star-worship is not mentioned in the Book of the Covenant -(Exod. xx.-xxiii.) or the oldest sections of the Mosaic Law. It is -first forbidden in Deut. iv. 19, xvii. 3, when contact with Syrians -and Assyrians made it known (comp. Job xxxi. 26-28; Jer. viii. 2, -xix. 13; Zeph. i. 5). The language of 2 Kings vii.-xxiii. frequently -reflects the prohibitions of Deuteronomy (see Deut. xii. 2, 30, 31, -iv. 19, v. 7, 8, xvi. 21, xviii. 10, xxxi. 16, etc.)</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_415_415" id="Footnote_415_415"></a><a href="#FNanchor_415_415"><span class="label">[415]</span></a> In 2 Kings xvii. 11, for "they did wicked things," the LXX. -has κοινωνοὺς (<i>i.e.</i>, <i>qedeshm</i>) ἐχάραξαν καὶ ἑταιρίδας (<i>qedeshth</i>); <i>i.e.</i>, -they had depraved <i>hieroduli</i> of both sexes. Comp. Hos. iv. 14; Gen. -xxxviii. 21 (where the allusion is to one of the votaries of Asherah).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_416_416" id="Footnote_416_416"></a><a href="#FNanchor_416_416"><span class="label">[416]</span></a> Bishop Lightfoot, <i>Sermons</i>, p. 267.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_417_417" id="Footnote_417_417"></a><a href="#FNanchor_417_417"><span class="label">[417]</span></a> "La quale Religione se ne Principi della Republica Christiana si -fusse mantenuta, secondo che dal dottore d'essa ne fu ordinato, -sarebbero gli State e le Republiche Christiane pi unite e pi felici -assai ch' elle non sono" (<i>Discorsi</i>, i. 12).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_418_418" id="Footnote_418_418"></a><a href="#FNanchor_418_418"><span class="label">[418]</span></a> 2 Kings xvii. 24. Comp. xviii. 34. Hence the later Jews comprehensively -called the Samaritans Cuthites. Comp. 2 Kings xix. 13; -Isa. xxxvii. 13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_419_419" id="Footnote_419_419"></a><a href="#FNanchor_419_419"><span class="label">[419]</span></a> Heliopolis, Ptolemy, v. 18, 7; Isa. xxxvi. 19. Here, according -to the Chaldan legends, Xisuthrus buried his tablets about the -Creation, etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_420_420" id="Footnote_420_420"></a><a href="#FNanchor_420_420"><span class="label">[420]</span></a> From Ezra iv. 2 some infer that the main immigrants were -introduced by Esarhaddon, who did not succeed till <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 681. He -claims to have colonised Syria.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_421_421" id="Footnote_421_421"></a><a href="#FNanchor_421_421"><span class="label">[421]</span></a> So we see from 2 Kings xix. 13, which applies to the reign of -Hezekiah.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_422_422" id="Footnote_422_422"></a><a href="#FNanchor_422_422"><span class="label">[422]</span></a> See Appendix, "The Golden Calves."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_423_423" id="Footnote_423_423"></a><a href="#FNanchor_423_423"><span class="label">[423]</span></a> He uses the agency of "the great and noble Asnapper" (Ezra -iv. 10) for the deportation (see Botta, 145; Layard, <i>Nin. and Bab.</i>, -i. 148; Dr. Hincks, <i>Jour. of Sacr. Lit.</i>, October 1858), unless Asnapper -be a confusion for Assurbanipal (Sardanapalus).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_424_424" id="Footnote_424_424"></a><a href="#FNanchor_424_424"><span class="label">[424]</span></a> Hos. iii. 4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_425_425" id="Footnote_425_425"></a><a href="#FNanchor_425_425"><span class="label">[425]</span></a> See Jer. xlix. 19, l. 44; Prov. xxii. 13, etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_426_426" id="Footnote_426_426"></a><a href="#FNanchor_426_426"><span class="label">[426]</span></a> Lit., "Daughter-huts" (Selden, <i>De Dis Syr.</i>, ii. 7), but probably -a transliteration. Zarpanit—"She who gives seed"—was Aphrodite -Pandemos (Mylitta—Herod., i. 199). The Rabbis—who only guess—say -she represented "the Clucking Hen"—<i>i.e.</i>, the Pleiades. There -does not seem to be any connection between Succoth and "Sakkuth," -the various reading in Amos v. 26, which seems to be the Assyrian -Moloch.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_427_427" id="Footnote_427_427"></a><a href="#FNanchor_427_427"><span class="label">[427]</span></a> Said to be worshipped under the form of a cock.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_428_428" id="Footnote_428_428"></a><a href="#FNanchor_428_428"><span class="label">[428]</span></a> LXX., Ἐβλαζέρ. Jarchi says these deities were worshipped -under base animal forms—but it is more than doubtful.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_429_429" id="Footnote_429_429"></a><a href="#FNanchor_429_429"><span class="label">[429]</span></a> The Rabbis, from Exod. xxiii. 13; Josh. xxiii. 7, thought they -were bound to give scornful nicknames to heathen deities. Hence -such changes as Kir-Heres for Kir-Cheres, Beelzebub for Beelzebul, -Bethaven for Bethel, Bosheth for Baal, etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_430_430" id="Footnote_430_430"></a><a href="#FNanchor_430_430"><span class="label">[430]</span></a> Not as in A.V., "of the lowest of them," but "of all classes." -Comp. 1 Kings xii. 31.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_431_431" id="Footnote_431_431"></a><a href="#FNanchor_431_431"><span class="label">[431]</span></a> In 2 Kings xvii. 31-38 we again find repeated references to -Deuteronomy (iv. 23, v. 32, x. 20, etc.).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_432_432" id="Footnote_432_432"></a><a href="#FNanchor_432_432"><span class="label">[432]</span></a> Ezra iv. 1. The actual word "Samaritans" occurs only once in -the Old Testament, in 2 Kings xvii. 29.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_433_433" id="Footnote_433_433"></a><a href="#FNanchor_433_433"><span class="label">[433]</span></a> See Neh. xiii. 4-9, 28, 29; Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, XI. vii. 2. Josephus makes -Manasseh a brother of the high priest Jaddua (<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 333).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_434_434" id="Footnote_434_434"></a><a href="#FNanchor_434_434"><span class="label">[434]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, IX. xiv. 3, XII. v. 5, XIII. ix. 1, XX. vi., XVIII. ii. 2. -The bitterly hostile relations between Jews and Samaritans in the -time of Christ are illustrated by Luke ix. 52-54.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_435_435" id="Footnote_435_435"></a><a href="#FNanchor_435_435"><span class="label">[435]</span></a> Probably a shortened form for Jehoahaz ("The Lord taketh hold"). -He is called Jahuhazi in Tiglath-Pileser's inscription (Schrader, -<i>Keilinschr.</i>, p. 163).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_436_436" id="Footnote_436_436"></a><a href="#FNanchor_436_436"><span class="label">[436]</span></a> For twenty-five it is not improbable that we should read fifteen.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_437_437" id="Footnote_437_437"></a><a href="#FNanchor_437_437"><span class="label">[437]</span></a> Isa. iii. 1-12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_438_438" id="Footnote_438_438"></a><a href="#FNanchor_438_438"><span class="label">[438]</span></a> In Isa. ii. 2-4 we find, as so often in the prophetic books in -their present too-often-haphazard arrangement, a glowing promise of -universal peace placed before unsparing denunciations. The verses -are also found in Micah (iv. 1, 2), and it has been conjectured that in -both prophets they are a quotation from some older source—perhaps -from Jonah, son of Amittai.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_439_439" id="Footnote_439_439"></a><a href="#FNanchor_439_439"><span class="label">[439]</span></a> Heb., "deceiving with their eyes."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_440_440" id="Footnote_440_440"></a><a href="#FNanchor_440_440"><span class="label">[440]</span></a> Isa. v. 7. The paronomasia of the original is striking. Van Oort -renders it, "He looked for <i>reason</i>, but behold <i>treason</i>; and for <i>right</i>, -but behold <i>affright</i>."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_441_441" id="Footnote_441_441"></a><a href="#FNanchor_441_441"><span class="label">[441]</span></a> His name means "Jehovah saves," and is perhaps alluded to in -Isa. viii. 18. Amos ("One who bears a burden"), needless to say, is -a totally different name from that of Amoz ("Vigorous"), the father -of Isaiah.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_442_442" id="Footnote_442_442"></a><a href="#FNanchor_442_442"><span class="label">[442]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxviii. 19.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_443_443" id="Footnote_443_443"></a><a href="#FNanchor_443_443"><span class="label">[443]</span></a> It may mean "God is good" (Tabeel).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_444_444" id="Footnote_444_444"></a><a href="#FNanchor_444_444"><span class="label">[444]</span></a> For further explanations I must refer to my paper on Rabbinic -Exegesis (<i>Expositor</i>, First Series, v. 373).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_445_445" id="Footnote_445_445"></a><a href="#FNanchor_445_445"><span class="label">[445]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxviii. 7.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_446_446" id="Footnote_446_446"></a><a href="#FNanchor_446_446"><span class="label">[446]</span></a> Of Oded nothing else is known.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_447_447" id="Footnote_447_447"></a><a href="#FNanchor_447_447"><span class="label">[447]</span></a> Some, however, interpret the name "A remnant repents" (LXX., -ὁ καταλειφθεὶς Ἰασούβ; Vulg., <i>Qui derelictus est Jaseb</i>).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_448_448" id="Footnote_448_448"></a><a href="#FNanchor_448_448"><span class="label">[448]</span></a> Isa. vi. 13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_449_449" id="Footnote_449_449"></a><a href="#FNanchor_449_449"><span class="label">[449]</span></a> The words "And within threescore and five years shall Ephraim -be broken, that it be not a people" (Isa. vii. 8), are almost certainly -an interpolation: for (1) the overthrow came within far less than -sixty years; (2) the clause awkwardly breaks the context; (3) the -"sixty years" is inconsistent with the promise (vii. 16) that it should -be within very few years.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_450_450" id="Footnote_450_450"></a><a href="#FNanchor_450_450"><span class="label">[450]</span></a> Isa. vii. 1-25.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_451_451" id="Footnote_451_451"></a><a href="#FNanchor_451_451"><span class="label">[451]</span></a> Not improbably the water which afterwards flowed through Hezekiah's -new tunnel between the Virgin's Tomb and the Pool of Siloam. It -is referred to in 2 Chron. xxxii. 3, 30 (Isa. xxii. 9-11). See <a href="#APPENDIX_II">Appendix II</a>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_452_452" id="Footnote_452_452"></a><a href="#FNanchor_452_452"><span class="label">[452]</span></a> This, if it be correct, can only mean that the son of Tabeal had -a party in Jerusalem; but Hitzig renders it "<i>dreadeth</i>," not "rejoiceth -in."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_453_453" id="Footnote_453_453"></a><a href="#FNanchor_453_453"><span class="label">[453]</span></a> The meaning is by no means clear.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_454_454" id="Footnote_454_454"></a><a href="#FNanchor_454_454"><span class="label">[454]</span></a> See Driver, <i>Isaiah</i>, p. 34.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_455_455" id="Footnote_455_455"></a><a href="#FNanchor_455_455"><span class="label">[455]</span></a> See 2 Kings xxiii. 11, which shows that this was not an innovation -of Manasseh's. They were common in Persia. See Q. Curtius, -iii. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_456_456" id="Footnote_456_456"></a><a href="#FNanchor_456_456"><span class="label">[456]</span></a> 2 Kings xvii. 31; Ezek. xvi. 21, xxiii. 37, xxxiii. 6; Deut. xii. 31; -Jer. xix. 5. See 2 Chron. xxviii. 3; for "his son," בְּנוֹ, it uses בָּנָיו -"his sons," but perhaps generically. Moloch-worship may have been -stimulated by accounts of the Assyrian fire-god Adrammelech -(Movers, <i>Phniz.</i>, ii. 101). On this sacrifice of children to Moloch, -which the Phœnicians referred back to the god El or Il, once King -of Byblos, who in a crisis of danger sacrificed his eldest son Icond, -see Plut., <i>De Superst.</i>, 13; Diod. Sic., xx. 12-14; 2 Kings iii. 27, -xvi. 3, xxi. 6; Mic. vi. 7; Dllinger, <i>Judenthum u. Heidenthum</i> (E. T.), -i. 427-429.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_457_457" id="Footnote_457_457"></a><a href="#FNanchor_457_457"><span class="label">[457]</span></a> This worship was to be punished by stoning (Lev. xviii. 21, -xx. 2-5; Deut. xviii. 10). On the whole subject see Movers, <i>Phniz.</i>, -64; Jarchi <i>on Jer. vii.</i> 31; Euseb., <i>Prp. Ev.</i>, iv. 16.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_458_458" id="Footnote_458_458"></a><a href="#FNanchor_458_458"><span class="label">[458]</span></a> Josephus says that Ahaz made "a whole burnt-offering" of his -son; but his authority is very small (καὶ ἴδιον ὡλοκαύτωσεν παῖδα). -Comp. Psalm cvi. 37.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_459_459" id="Footnote_459_459"></a><a href="#FNanchor_459_459"><span class="label">[459]</span></a> Ignorant Romanists have often cherished the same notions about -the saints. For centuries in Spain the people bought the old gowns -and cowls of the monks, and buried their dead in them, to deceive -St. Peter into the notion that they were Dominicans or Franciscans!</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_460_460" id="Footnote_460_460"></a><a href="#FNanchor_460_460"><span class="label">[460]</span></a> See Ovid, <i>Fasti</i>, v. 659: "Scripea pro domino Tiberi jactatur -imago." They were also called <i>Argei</i>, <i>id.</i> 621; Varro, <i>L. L.</i>, vi. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_461_461" id="Footnote_461_461"></a><a href="#FNanchor_461_461"><span class="label">[461]</span></a> Varro, <i>L. L.</i>, v. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_462_462" id="Footnote_462_462"></a><a href="#FNanchor_462_462"><span class="label">[462]</span></a> Herod., ii. 137. Egypt., <i>Sebek</i>; Heb., <i>So</i> (2 Kings xvii. 4), or -perhaps <i>Seve</i>; Arab., <i>Shab'i</i>. Rawlinson, <i>Hist. of Anct. Egypt</i>, ii. -433-450.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_463_463" id="Footnote_463_463"></a><a href="#FNanchor_463_463"><span class="label">[463]</span></a> Kir (see Amos ix. 7) is omitted in the LXX. Elam is added in -Isa. xxii. 6. Tiglath-Pileser calls the king Rasunnu Sarimirisu—<i>i.e.</i>, -of Aram. See Smith, <i>Assyr. Discoveries</i>, p. 274; <i>Eponym Canon</i>, 68; -Schrader, <i>K. A. T.</i>, 152 ff.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_464_464" id="Footnote_464_464"></a><a href="#FNanchor_464_464"><span class="label">[464]</span></a> Isa. xvii. 1-11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_465_465" id="Footnote_465_465"></a><a href="#FNanchor_465_465"><span class="label">[465]</span></a> The name seems to be Tuklat-abal-isarra,—according to Oppert -worshipper of the son of the Zodiac—<i>i.e.</i>, of Nin or Hercules. -According to Polyhistor, he was a usurper who had been a vine-dresser -in the royal gardens. He never mentions his ancestry. But -see Schrader, <i>K. A. T.</i>, 217 ff., 240 ff., and in Riehm.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_466_466" id="Footnote_466_466"></a><a href="#FNanchor_466_466"><span class="label">[466]</span></a> <i>Eponym Canon</i>, p. 121, lines 1-15. On this fall of Damascus and -Samaria, see Isa. xvii.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_467_467" id="Footnote_467_467"></a><a href="#FNanchor_467_467"><span class="label">[467]</span></a> Jahuhazi (Schrader, <i>Keilinschr.</i>, p. 263). He probably bore both -names; but, as in the case of Jeconiah, who is called Coniah, the -omission of the element "Jehovah" from his name may have been -intended as a mark of reprobation.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_468_468" id="Footnote_468_468"></a><a href="#FNanchor_468_468"><span class="label">[468]</span></a> The remark may refer to some earlier period in the reign of Ahaz, -before the capture of Damascus. It is more probable that the altar -was used for some Assyrian deity, and the adoption of it may have -flattered Tiglath-Pileser.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_469_469" id="Footnote_469_469"></a><a href="#FNanchor_469_469"><span class="label">[469]</span></a> 2 Kings xvi. 11, which records the zealous subservience of Urijah, -is wanting in some MSS. of the LXX. But that the altar was made, -and without his opposition, is clear from the narrative. Asa (2 Chron. -xv. 8) had repaired Solomon's great altar; Hezekiah subsequently -cleansed it (<i>id.</i> xxix. 18); Manasseh rebuilt it (<i>Q'ri</i>). The brass of -it ultimately went to Babylon (Jer. lii. 17-20).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_470_470" id="Footnote_470_470"></a><a href="#FNanchor_470_470"><span class="label">[470]</span></a> Bhr says: "It seems that Urijah, like his companion, was only -anxious for his revenues. At any rate, his conduct is a sign of the -character and standing of the priests of that time. They were -'dumb dogs who could not bark.' They all followed their own ways, -every one for his own gain" (Isa. lvi. 10, 11). "We have in this high -priest," says the <i>Wrtemberg Summary</i>, "a specimen of those hypocrites -and belly-servants who say, 'Whose bread I eat, his song -I sing'; who veer about with the wind, and seek to be pleasant to -all men; who wish to hurt no one's feelings, but teach just what any -one wants to hear."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_471_471" id="Footnote_471_471"></a><a href="#FNanchor_471_471"><span class="label">[471]</span></a> 1 Kings viii. 64; 2 Chron. iv. 1. In this and similar instances -commentators, biassed by <i>a priori</i> considerations, have imagined that -Ahaz did not in person offer sacrifices. But this is what the text -says, and it was the custom of kings to regard themselves as invested -with Divine attributes. Ahaz may have had this lesson impressed -on his mind by his visit to Tiglath-Pileser. See Grtz, <i>Gesch. der -Juden.</i>, ii. 150. Layard, <i>Nin. and Bab.</i>, 472 ff., gives us pictures -of Assyrian kings ministering at their altars, which are of various -shapes.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_472_472" id="Footnote_472_472"></a><a href="#FNanchor_472_472"><span class="label">[472]</span></a> 2 Kings xvi. 15. Vulg., <i>paratum erit ad voluntatem meam</i>. -The LXX. followed another reading: ἔσται μοὶ εἰς τὸ πρωί. Grtz -(ii. 150), for לכקר, "to inquire," reads לקרב "to draw near to."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_473_473" id="Footnote_473_473"></a><a href="#FNanchor_473_473"><span class="label">[473]</span></a> 1 Kings vii. 23-39.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_474_474" id="Footnote_474_474"></a><a href="#FNanchor_474_474"><span class="label">[474]</span></a> 2 Kings xvi. 18. The allusions are obscure. R.V., "the covered -way"; A.V., "the covert for the Sabbath." See 2 Chron. ix. 4. -Here the Hebr. <i>Q'ri</i> has <i>Msak</i>, and the Vulg. <i>Musach Sabbati</i>. The -LXX. evidently did not understand it (καὶ τὸν θεμέλιον τῆς καθέδρας -ᾠκοδόμησεν). For "covert for the Sabbath," Geiger suggests "molten -images for the Shame" (Bosheth-Baal, by transposition of <i>Shabbath</i>). -Comp. 2 Chron. xxviii. 2.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_475_475" id="Footnote_475_475"></a><a href="#FNanchor_475_475"><span class="label">[475]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxviii. 20: "Tiglath-Pileser came unto him, and distressed -him, but helped him not."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_476_476" id="Footnote_476_476"></a><a href="#FNanchor_476_476"><span class="label">[476]</span></a> 2 Kings xviii. 15, 16.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_477_477" id="Footnote_477_477"></a><a href="#FNanchor_477_477"><span class="label">[477]</span></a> In justice to Ahaz, we should observe that (1) in every instance -the later account multiplies and magnifies and gives a darker -colouring to his offences; (2) that neither Isaiah, Micah, nor any -other prophet has a word of reproach for such enormities in Ahaz.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_478_478" id="Footnote_478_478"></a><a href="#FNanchor_478_478"><span class="label">[478]</span></a> It is a Jewish tradition that Hezekiah would not bury his father -Ahaz in a sarcophagus, but on a bier (<i>Pesachin</i>, f. 56, 1; <i>Sanhedrin</i>, -f. 47, 1; Grtz, <i>Gesch. d. Juden.</i>, ii, 224).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_479_479" id="Footnote_479_479"></a><a href="#FNanchor_479_479"><span class="label">[479]</span></a> His name, <i>Chizquyyah</i>, is shortened from <i>Yechizquyyahoo</i> (Isa. -i. 1; 2 Kings xx. 10; Hos. i. 1). It means "Jehovah's strength" -(<i>Gesen.</i>), or "Yah is might" (<i>Frst</i>).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_480_480" id="Footnote_480_480"></a><a href="#FNanchor_480_480"><span class="label">[480]</span></a> The first of these dates is highly uncertain, as is the entire -chronology of this reign. I follow Kittel.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_481_481" id="Footnote_481_481"></a><a href="#FNanchor_481_481"><span class="label">[481]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxi. 2-21.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_482_482" id="Footnote_482_482"></a><a href="#FNanchor_482_482"><span class="label">[482]</span></a> Josiah did this many years later (2 Kings xxiii. 13).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_483_483" id="Footnote_483_483"></a><a href="#FNanchor_483_483"><span class="label">[483]</span></a> Gen. xxxv. 14. See Spencer, <i>De legg. Hebr.</i>, i. 444; Bochart, -<i>Canaan</i>, ii. 2.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_484_484" id="Footnote_484_484"></a><a href="#FNanchor_484_484"><span class="label">[484]</span></a> Exod. xxiv. 4. Comp. Deut. vii. 5, xii. 3, xvi. 22; Lev. xxvi. 1; -2 Chron. xiv. 3, xxxi. 1; Jer. xliii. 13; Hos. x. 2; Mic. v. 13 (where -the A.V. often has "statue" or "image"). Comp. Clem. Alex., <i>Strom.</i>, -i. 24; Arnob., <i>c. Gent.</i>, i. 39.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_485_485" id="Footnote_485_485"></a><a href="#FNanchor_485_485"><span class="label">[485]</span></a> The rendering "grove" in the A.V. is borrowed from the ἄλσος of the LXX., and the <i>lucus</i> of the Vulgate. On the connection of -the Asherah with the sacred tree of the Assyrian, see my article on -"Grove" in Smith's <i>Dict. of the Bible</i>; and Fergusson, <i>Nineveh and -Persepolis Restored</i>, 299-304. On the worship of Asherah, see 1 Kings -xv. 13; 2 Kings xxi. 3-7, xxiii. 4; 2 Chron. xv. 16; Judg. iii. 5-7, -vi. 25, xviii. 18. Baudissin in <i>Herzog Realencykl.</i>, <i>s.v.</i> We may well -be startled by the prevalence of idolatry in Jerusalem revealed in -Isa. x. 11, xxvii. 9, xxix. 11, xxx. 9, 22, etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_486_486" id="Footnote_486_486"></a><a href="#FNanchor_486_486"><span class="label">[486]</span></a> See Wellhausen, <i>Hist.</i>, 235; Stade, <i>Gesch. d. V. I.</i>, 460; W. R. -Smith, <i>Religion of the Semites</i>, 171; Cheyne, <i>Isaiah</i>, ii. 303; Renan, -<i>Hist. du Peuple d'Israel</i>, i. 230 (Prof. Driver, <i>Bibl. Dict.</i>, i. 258, 2nd -edition).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_487_487" id="Footnote_487_487"></a><a href="#FNanchor_487_487"><span class="label">[487]</span></a> <i>Hierozoicon</i>, ii. 3, 13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_488_488" id="Footnote_488_488"></a><a href="#FNanchor_488_488"><span class="label">[488]</span></a> Jer. xliv. 17. In the collection of antiquities of Baron Ustinoff at -Jaffa are five or six dragon-headed serpents, with ears of copper and -hollow inside. They are ancient, and were perhaps used as talismanic -copies of Nehushtan.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_489_489" id="Footnote_489_489"></a><a href="#FNanchor_489_489"><span class="label">[489]</span></a> If this was a genuine relic, it must have been nearly eight -hundred years old. It is never mentioned elsewhere.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_490_490" id="Footnote_490_490"></a><a href="#FNanchor_490_490"><span class="label">[490]</span></a> נְחֻשׁתָּן, "a brazen thing." The king certainly showed a horror -of sacerdotal imposture and religious materialism. Yet Renan argues, -from Isa. x. 11, xxvii. 9, xxx. 9, 22, that he must have had a certain -amount of tolerance. See <i>Hist. du Peuple d'Israel</i>, iii. 30.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_491_491" id="Footnote_491_491"></a><a href="#FNanchor_491_491"><span class="label">[491]</span></a> 2 Kings xviii. 4. <i>Vayyikra</i> is like the English indefinite plural. -The impersonal rendering (as in other passages) is adopted in the -Targum of Jonathan, the Peshito, etc., and by Luther, Bunsen, Ewald, -and most moderns.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_492_492" id="Footnote_492_492"></a><a href="#FNanchor_492_492"><span class="label">[492]</span></a> This relic is still shown in the Church of St. Ambrose at Milan. -It used to be the popular notion that it would hiss at the end of the -world. The history of the Milan "relic" is that a Milanese envoy -to the court of the Emperor John Zimisces at Constantinople chose it -from the imperial treasures, being assured that it was made of the -same metal that Hezekiah had broken up (Sigonius, <i>Hist. Regn. -Ital.</i>, vii.). It is probably a symbol used by some ophite sect. See -Dean Plumptre, <i>Dict. of Bibl.</i>, <i>s.v.</i> "Serpent."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_493_493" id="Footnote_493_493"></a><a href="#FNanchor_493_493"><span class="label">[493]</span></a> 2 Kings xvi. 8; Driver, <i>Isaiah</i>, 68.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_494_494" id="Footnote_494_494"></a><a href="#FNanchor_494_494"><span class="label">[494]</span></a> The diverting of the water-courses enabled him to bring the -water into the city by a subterranean tunnel. The Saracens took a -similar precaution (Gul. Tyr., viii. 7). See <a href="#APPENDIX_II">Appendix II</a>., where the -inscription is given; and compare 2 Chron. xxxii. 30. Apparently -it carried the water of Gihon to the south-east gate, where were the -king's gardens. Ecclus. xlviii. 17: "Ezekias fortified his city, and -brought in water into the midst thereof: he digged the hard rock -with iron, and made wells for water." For "water" the MSS. read -"Gog," a corruption probably for ἀγωγὸν, "a conduit" (Geiger) or -"Gihon" (Fritzsche).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_495_495" id="Footnote_495_495"></a><a href="#FNanchor_495_495"><span class="label">[495]</span></a> Psalm xlvi. 1-11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_496_496" id="Footnote_496_496"></a><a href="#FNanchor_496_496"><span class="label">[496]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxviii. 18.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_497_497" id="Footnote_497_497"></a><a href="#FNanchor_497_497"><span class="label">[497]</span></a> 2 Kings xviii. 8: comp. xvii. 9. Josephus says that he failed to -take Gath (<i>Antt.</i>, IX. xiii. 3).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_498_498" id="Footnote_498_498"></a><a href="#FNanchor_498_498"><span class="label">[498]</span></a> A.V., "treasurer" (<i>soken</i>; lit., "deputy" or "associate": Isa. -xxii. 15). He was "over the household." The Egyptian alliance -had for Judah, as Renan points out, some of the fascination that a -Russian alliance has often had for troubled spirits in France (<i>Hist. -du Peuple d'Israel</i>, iii. 12).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_499_499" id="Footnote_499_499"></a><a href="#FNanchor_499_499"><span class="label">[499]</span></a> Renan says that he may have been a Sebennyite, and his name -Sebent.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_500_500" id="Footnote_500_500"></a><a href="#FNanchor_500_500"><span class="label">[500]</span></a> Isa. xxii. 17, 18: "Behold, the Lord shall sling and sling, and pack -and pack, and toss and toss thee away like a ball into a distant land; -and there thou shalt die" (Stanley). The versions vary considerably.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_501_501" id="Footnote_501_501"></a><a href="#FNanchor_501_501"><span class="label">[501]</span></a> Isa. xxxvii. 2. There can be little doubt that there were not <i>two</i> -Shebnas.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_502_502" id="Footnote_502_502"></a><a href="#FNanchor_502_502"><span class="label">[502]</span></a> Mic. i. 10-16. See the writer's <i>Minor Prophets</i> ("Men of the -Bible" Series), pp. 130-133, for an explanation of this enigmatic -prophecy.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_503_503" id="Footnote_503_503"></a><a href="#FNanchor_503_503"><span class="label">[503]</span></a> Jer. xxvi. 8-24. He tells us that the prophecy was delivered in -the reign of Hezekiah. See my <i>Minor Prophets</i>, pp. 123-140.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_504_504" id="Footnote_504_504"></a><a href="#FNanchor_504_504"><span class="label">[504]</span></a> Isa. x. 28-32. It would involve a cross-country route over -several deep ravines—<i>e.g.</i>, the Wady Suweinit, near Michmash. In -1 Sam. xiv. 2, Thenius, for "Migron," reads "the Precipice." Some -take Aiath for Ai, three miles south of Bethel. Renan says (<i>Hist. du -Peuple d'Israel</i>, iii.): "Nom d'Anathoth, arrang symboliquement."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_505_505" id="Footnote_505_505"></a><a href="#FNanchor_505_505"><span class="label">[505]</span></a> Isa. x. 14. The metaphor of a bird's nest occurs more than once -in the boastful Assyrian records.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_506_506" id="Footnote_506_506"></a><a href="#FNanchor_506_506"><span class="label">[506]</span></a> Isa. xxx. 1-7. Rahab means "fierceness," "insolence." For the -various uses of the word, see Job xxvi. 12; Isa. li. 9, 10, 15; -Psalm lxxxix. 9, 10, lxxxvii. 4, 5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_507_507" id="Footnote_507_507"></a><a href="#FNanchor_507_507"><span class="label">[507]</span></a> See Dr. S. Cox (<i>Expositor</i>, i. 98-104) on Isa. xxviii. 7-13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_508_508" id="Footnote_508_508"></a><a href="#FNanchor_508_508"><span class="label">[508]</span></a> Acts xvii. 18.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_509_509" id="Footnote_509_509"></a><a href="#FNanchor_509_509"><span class="label">[509]</span></a> Isa. xxviii. 7-22.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_510_510" id="Footnote_510_510"></a><a href="#FNanchor_510_510"><span class="label">[510]</span></a> Professor Smith, <i>Isaiah</i>, i. 12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_511_511" id="Footnote_511_511"></a><a href="#FNanchor_511_511"><span class="label">[511]</span></a> Bagehot, <i>Physics and Politics</i>, p. 73; Smith, <i>Isaiah</i>, 109.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_512_512" id="Footnote_512_512"></a><a href="#FNanchor_512_512"><span class="label">[512]</span></a> One of the first to point out the <i>necessary</i> rearrangement of the -events of Hezekiah's reign was Dr. Hincks, in his paper on "A Rectification -of Chronology which the newly discovered Apis-stls render -necessary" (<i>Journ. of Sacred Lit.</i>, October 1858). See my article on -Hezekiah, Smith, <i>Dict. of the Bible</i>, 2nd ed., ii. 1251.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_513_513" id="Footnote_513_513"></a><a href="#FNanchor_513_513"><span class="label">[513]</span></a> Heb., <i>sh'chn</i>; LXX., ἕλκος; Vulg., <i>ulcus</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_514_514" id="Footnote_514_514"></a><a href="#FNanchor_514_514"><span class="label">[514]</span></a> The Rabbis even make his sickness the punishment for his -having neglected to secure an heir. He pleads that he foresaw the -wickedness of his son. Isaiah tells him not to try to forestall God -(<i>Berachoth</i>, f. 10, 1).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_515_515" id="Footnote_515_515"></a><a href="#FNanchor_515_515"><span class="label">[515]</span></a> Isa. xxxviii. 10-20.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_516_516" id="Footnote_516_516"></a><a href="#FNanchor_516_516"><span class="label">[516]</span></a> Comp. 1 Kings xxi. 4 (Ahab).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_517_517" id="Footnote_517_517"></a><a href="#FNanchor_517_517"><span class="label">[517]</span></a> 2 Kings xx. 4. The <i>Q'r</i> or "read" text is, as here rendered, <i>chatsee</i> -(comp. 1 Kings vii. 8), and is followed by the LXX. (ἐν τῇ αὐλῇ τῇ -μέσῃ), by the Vulgate (<i>mediam partem atrii</i>), and by the A.V. The R.V., -which adopts the Kethb or written text, <i>ha'r</i>, renders it "the middle -part of the city." If this be the true reading, it would mean that -Isaiah had gone some distance from the palace, and was now perhaps -in the Valley between the Upper and the Lower City. But it seems -not improbable that (1) "the steps of Ahaz" would be in the royal -court, and (2) the answer of God, like the mercy of Christ to the -suffering, may have come promptly as an echo to the appealing cry.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_518_518" id="Footnote_518_518"></a><a href="#FNanchor_518_518"><span class="label">[518]</span></a> The LXX. calls "the stairs" ἀναβαθμοὺς τοῦ οἴκου τοῦ πατρός σου, -and so, too, Josephus (<i>Antt.</i>, X. ii. 1). The Targum calls them "an -hour-stone." Symmachus has, στρέψω τὴν σκίαν τῶν γραμμῶν ἥ κατέβη -ἐν ὡρολογίῳ Ἀχάζ.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_519_519" id="Footnote_519_519"></a><a href="#FNanchor_519_519"><span class="label">[519]</span></a> It should, however, be observed that on the question of priority -critics are divided. Grotius, Vitringa, Paulus, Drechsler, etc., thought -that the account in the Book of Isaiah is the original; De Wette, -Maurer, Koster, Winer, Driver, etc., regard that account as a later -abbreviation, perhaps from a common source.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_520_520" id="Footnote_520_520"></a><a href="#FNanchor_520_520"><span class="label">[520]</span></a> See Professor Lumby, <i>ad loc.</i></p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_521_521" id="Footnote_521_521"></a><a href="#FNanchor_521_521"><span class="label">[521]</span></a> There is an exactly similar sun-dial not far from Delhi.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_522_522" id="Footnote_522_522"></a><a href="#FNanchor_522_522"><span class="label">[522]</span></a> <i>Journ. of Asiatic Soc.</i>, xv. 286-293.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_523_523" id="Footnote_523_523"></a><a href="#FNanchor_523_523"><span class="label">[523]</span></a> Figs have a recognised use for imposthumes. See Dioscorides -and Pliny quoted in Celsius, <i>Hierobot.</i>, ii. 373. In the passage of -<i>Berachoth</i> quoted above, Hezekiah in his sickness asks Isaiah to -give him his daughter in marriage, that he may have an heir. Isaiah -replies that the decree of his death is irrevocable. The king bids -Isaiah depart, and says (quoting Job xiii. 15) that a man must not -despair, even if a sword is laid on his neck.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_524_524" id="Footnote_524_524"></a><a href="#FNanchor_524_524"><span class="label">[524]</span></a> Comp. Psalm xlii. 4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_525_525" id="Footnote_525_525"></a><a href="#FNanchor_525_525"><span class="label">[525]</span></a> Isa. xxxviii. 10-20.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_526_526" id="Footnote_526_526"></a><a href="#FNanchor_526_526"><span class="label">[526]</span></a> The Babylonian form of his name is Marduk-habal-iddi-na—<i>i.e.</i>, -"Merodach gave a son." He is the Mardokempados of the <i>Ptolemaic -Canon</i>, and the second fragment of his reign (six months) is mentioned -by Polyhistor (<i>ap.</i> Euseb.). Josephus calls him Baladan -(<i>Antt.</i>, X. ii. 2). He was originally the prince of the Chaldan <i>Bit -Yakm</i>. Sargon calls him "Merodach-Baladan, the foe, the perverse, -who, contrary to the will of the great gods, ruled as king at Babylon." -He displaced him for a time by "Belibus, the son of a wise man, -whom one had reared like a little dog" (as we might say "like a -tame cat") "in my palace" (Schrader, ii. 32). In the Assyrian records -he is often called (by mistake?) "the son of Yakim." For the adventures -of the Babylonian hero, see Schrader, <i>K. A. T.</i>, 213 ff., 224 ff., -227, and in Riehm, <i>Handwrterbuch</i>, ii. 982.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_527_527" id="Footnote_527_527"></a><a href="#FNanchor_527_527"><span class="label">[527]</span></a> Isa. xiv. 4, xiii. 19.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_528_528" id="Footnote_528_528"></a><a href="#FNanchor_528_528"><span class="label">[528]</span></a> Gen. x. 10, 11, xi. 1-9.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_529_529" id="Footnote_529_529"></a><a href="#FNanchor_529_529"><span class="label">[529]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, X. ii. 2: Σύμμαχόν τε αὐτὸν εἶναι παρεκάλει καὶ φίλον.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_530_530" id="Footnote_530_530"></a><a href="#FNanchor_530_530"><span class="label">[530]</span></a> 2 Kings xx. 13. LXX., ἐχάρη.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_531_531" id="Footnote_531_531"></a><a href="#FNanchor_531_531"><span class="label">[531]</span></a> See Dan. i. 6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_532_532" id="Footnote_532_532"></a><a href="#FNanchor_532_532"><span class="label">[532]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_533_533" id="Footnote_533_533"></a><a href="#FNanchor_533_533"><span class="label">[533]</span></a> Job i. 21.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_534_534" id="Footnote_534_534"></a><a href="#FNanchor_534_534"><span class="label">[534]</span></a> Manasseh seems to mean "one who forgets." See Gen. xli. 51. -It was the name of the husband of Judith (Judith viii. 2), and is found -in Ezra x. 30, 33.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_535_535" id="Footnote_535_535"></a><a href="#FNanchor_535_535"><span class="label">[535]</span></a> One legend of his birth resembles the finding of Moses in the -bulrushes.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_536_536" id="Footnote_536_536"></a><a href="#FNanchor_536_536"><span class="label">[536]</span></a> Schrader, <i>K. A. T.</i>, pp. 272-274; <i>Records of the Past</i>, vii. 28.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_537_537" id="Footnote_537_537"></a><a href="#FNanchor_537_537"><span class="label">[537]</span></a> Smith, <i>Eponym Canon</i>, p. 130.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_538_538" id="Footnote_538_538"></a><a href="#FNanchor_538_538"><span class="label">[538]</span></a> See Prof. Smith, <i>Isaiah</i>, p. 198.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_539_539" id="Footnote_539_539"></a><a href="#FNanchor_539_539"><span class="label">[539]</span></a> <i>Records of the Past</i>, vii. 40. Sargon's words are, "The people of -Philistia, Judah, Edom, and Moab were speaking treason. The people -and their evil chiefs, to fight against me, unto <i>Pharaoh, the King of -Egypt, a monarch who could not save them</i>, their presents carried, -and besought his alliance" (G. Smith, <i>Assyrian Discoveries</i>, 290).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_540_540" id="Footnote_540_540"></a><a href="#FNanchor_540_540"><span class="label">[540]</span></a> On the monuments called <i>Turtanu</i>, "Holder of power." See -Schrader in Riehm, <i>s.v.</i></p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_541_541" id="Footnote_541_541"></a><a href="#FNanchor_541_541"><span class="label">[541]</span></a> Raphia, or Ropeh, is on the borders of the desert. Asia beat -Africa in every encounter—at Raphia, at Altaqu, at Carchemish. -The impression of the seal of Shabak, attached to his capitulations -with Sargon, was found at Nineveh by Sir A. H. Layard, and is now -in the British Museum. Shabak died in 712. His son Shabatoh -succeeded him in Egypt, and his nephew(?) Tirhakah in Ethiopia. -Sabaco's name assumes many forms (LXX., Σηγώρ; Herod., ii. 137; -Σαβακώς; Vulg., <i>Sua</i>). The Egyptians called him Shaba(ka).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_542_542" id="Footnote_542_542"></a><a href="#FNanchor_542_542"><span class="label">[542]</span></a> Isa. xx. 1-6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_543_543" id="Footnote_543_543"></a><a href="#FNanchor_543_543"><span class="label">[543]</span></a> Lenormant, <i>Les Premires Civilisations</i>, ii. 203; <i>Records of the -Past</i>, vii. 41-46.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_544_544" id="Footnote_544_544"></a><a href="#FNanchor_544_544"><span class="label">[544]</span></a> Isa. xxi. 6, A.V., "Watch in the watch-tower." Hitzig, Cheyne, -"They spread the carpets." Much in this short oracle (xxi. 1-10) -is obscure. Isaiah seems, in denouncing the fate of Babylon, to -mourn for the ruin of the smaller states of which it was the prelude -(G. Smith, <i>Soc. of Bibl. Arch.</i>, ii. 320 Kleinert, <i>Stud. u. Krit.</i>, 1877 -W. R. Smith in <i>Enc. Brit.</i>, <i>s.v.</i> "Isaiah").</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_545_545" id="Footnote_545_545"></a><a href="#FNanchor_545_545"><span class="label">[545]</span></a> Isa. xxi. 10—<i>i.e.</i>, "My people threshed and trodden"; -LXX., ὁ καταλελειμμένος καὶ οἱ ὀδυνώμενοι <i>Records of the Past</i>, -vii. 47.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_546_546" id="Footnote_546_546"></a><a href="#FNanchor_546_546"><span class="label">[546]</span></a> Herod., Σαναχάριβος; Jos., Σεναχήριβος. See <a href="#APPENDIX_I">Appendix I</a>. Sin -was the moon-god; Merodach, the planet Jupiter; Adar, Saturn; -Ishtai, Venus; Nebo, Mercury; Nergal, Mars (Schrader, ii. 117).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_547_547" id="Footnote_547_547"></a><a href="#FNanchor_547_547"><span class="label">[547]</span></a> Sargon seems to have been murdered in the palace of unparalleled -splendour which he built at Dur-Sharrukin ("The City of Sargon"). -It took him five years to build it with armies of workmen. Its halls, -opened by Botta, were the first Assyrian halls ever entered by a -modern's foot. It is strange that this greatest of Assyrian kings is -only mentioned once in the Bible (Isa. xx. 1). We owe to Assyriology -his restoration to his proper place in the annals of mankind. See -Ragozin, <i>Assyria</i>, 247-254.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_548_548" id="Footnote_548_548"></a><a href="#FNanchor_548_548"><span class="label">[548]</span></a> Rawlinson, <i>Ancient Monarchies</i>, ii. 178.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_549_549" id="Footnote_549_549"></a><a href="#FNanchor_549_549"><span class="label">[549]</span></a> Canon Rawlinson, <i>Kings of Israel and Judah</i>, 187.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_550_550" id="Footnote_550_550"></a><a href="#FNanchor_550_550"><span class="label">[550]</span></a> On his own monuments this campaign, except its final catastrophe, -is narrated in four sections: (1) The subjugation of Phœnicia, and of -Philistine towns; (2) the conquest of King Zidka of Askelon; (3) the -defeat of Ekron, the restoration of their vassal king Pad to his -throne, and the defeat of Egypt at Altaqu; (4) the expedition -against Jerusalem (Schrader, E. Tr., i. 298). See <a href="#APPENDIX_I">Appendix I</a>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_551_551" id="Footnote_551_551"></a><a href="#FNanchor_551_551"><span class="label">[551]</span></a> This allusion is said to be the only instance of humour—"<i>grim</i> -humour, or it would not be Assyrian"—which occurs in the -Assyrian annals.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_552_552" id="Footnote_552_552"></a><a href="#FNanchor_552_552"><span class="label">[552]</span></a> Schrader, pp. 234-279. The account of the memorable campaign -is narrated in duplicate on the Taylor Cylinder in the British Museum, -and on the Bull Inscription at Kouyunjik.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_553_553" id="Footnote_553_553"></a><a href="#FNanchor_553_553"><span class="label">[553]</span></a> Sennacherib calls Tirhakah's army "a host that no man could -number"; but it was defeated by the better discipline, the heavier -armour, and the superior physical strength of the Assyrians.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_554_554" id="Footnote_554_554"></a><a href="#FNanchor_554_554"><span class="label">[554]</span></a> See Josh. xix. 43.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_555_555" id="Footnote_555_555"></a><a href="#FNanchor_555_555"><span class="label">[555]</span></a> This very phrase "I imposed on them" is found on Sennacherib's -monument (Schrader, ii. 1). The references, when not otherwise -specified, are to Whitehouse's English translation.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_556_556" id="Footnote_556_556"></a><a href="#FNanchor_556_556"><span class="label">[556]</span></a> In 2 Kings xviii. 16 the word "pillars" or "doorposts" is -uncertain. LXX., ἐστηριγμένα; Vulg., <i>laminas auri</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_557_557" id="Footnote_557_557"></a><a href="#FNanchor_557_557"><span class="label">[557]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxii. 9. He had to besiege it "with all his power." He -seems to have thought it even more important than Jerusalem, for he -superintended the siege in person (Layard, <i>Nineveh and Babylon</i>, -150; <i>Monuments of Nineveh</i>, 2nd series, pl. 21). The ruined Tel of -Umm-el-Laks lies between the Wady Simsim and the Wady-el-Ahsy -(Riehm).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_558_558" id="Footnote_558_558"></a><a href="#FNanchor_558_558"><span class="label">[558]</span></a> See 2 Chron. xi. 9, xxv. 27; Jer. xxxiv. 7. The allusion to this -city in Micah (i. 13) is obscure: "O thou inhabitant of Lachish [swift -steed], bind the chariot to the swift steed: she is the beginning of -sin to the daughter of Zion: for the transgressions of Israel were -found in thee." This seems to imply that some form of idolatry had -come from Israel to Lachish, and from Lachish to Jerusalem. In -Sennacherib's picture of the city, foreign worship is represented as -going on in it (Layard, <i>Monuments of Nineveh</i>, Pls. 21 and 24; -Rawlinson, <i>Herodotus</i>, i. 477).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_559_559" id="Footnote_559_559"></a><a href="#FNanchor_559_559"><span class="label">[559]</span></a> Isa. xxix., xxx., xxxi.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_560_560" id="Footnote_560_560"></a><a href="#FNanchor_560_560"><span class="label">[560]</span></a> Isa. xxxiii. 8.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_561_561" id="Footnote_561_561"></a><a href="#FNanchor_561_561"><span class="label">[561]</span></a> Isa. xx. 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_562_562" id="Footnote_562_562"></a><a href="#FNanchor_562_562"><span class="label">[562]</span></a> Jer. xxxix. 3. The meaning of the name is not certain. <i>Sars</i>, -in Hebrew, is "eunuch"; but the word is not known in Assyrian -records, and we should expect <i>Rabsarsm</i>, as in Dan. i. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_563_563" id="Footnote_563_563"></a><a href="#FNanchor_563_563"><span class="label">[563]</span></a> Rabsak perhaps means <i>chief officer</i> or vizier, and is Hebraised -into Rabshakeh. Prof. G. A. Smith (<i>Isaiah</i>, p. 345) calls him -"Sennacherib's Bismarck." Rabshakeh, usually rendered "chief -cupbearer," is an Aramaised form of Rabsak (great chief); but we -know of no chief cupbearer at the Assyrian court (Schrader, <i>K. A. T.</i>, -199 f.).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_564_564" id="Footnote_564_564"></a><a href="#FNanchor_564_564"><span class="label">[564]</span></a> From an Apis-stl he seems to have reigned twenty-six years -(<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 694-668?).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_565_565" id="Footnote_565_565"></a><a href="#FNanchor_565_565"><span class="label">[565]</span></a> Isa. xxii. 1-13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_566_566" id="Footnote_566_566"></a><a href="#FNanchor_566_566"><span class="label">[566]</span></a> Eliakim. See Isa. xxii. 21, 22.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_567_567" id="Footnote_567_567"></a><a href="#FNanchor_567_567"><span class="label">[567]</span></a> "Vain words"; lit., "a word of the lips." LXX., λόγοι χειλέων.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_568_568" id="Footnote_568_568"></a><a href="#FNanchor_568_568"><span class="label">[568]</span></a> Comp. Isa. xxx. 1-7; Ezek. xxix. 6. It seems to be an over-refinement -to suppose that Sennacherib refers to the divisions between -Egypt and Ethiopia.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_569_569" id="Footnote_569_569"></a><a href="#FNanchor_569_569"><span class="label">[569]</span></a> 2 Kings xviii. 23, A.V.: "Let Hezekiah give pledges."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_570_570" id="Footnote_570_570"></a><a href="#FNanchor_570_570"><span class="label">[570]</span></a> Heb., <i>Armth</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_571_571" id="Footnote_571_571"></a><a href="#FNanchor_571_571"><span class="label">[571]</span></a> 2 Kings xviii. 28, where <i>stood</i> should be rendered <i>came forward</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_572_572" id="Footnote_572_572"></a><a href="#FNanchor_572_572"><span class="label">[572]</span></a> The coarse expression is softened down by the Chronicler -(2 Chron. xxxii. 18).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_573_573" id="Footnote_573_573"></a><a href="#FNanchor_573_573"><span class="label">[573]</span></a> The kings of Assyria usually called themselves "great king, -mighty king, king of the multitude, king of the land Assur."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_574_574" id="Footnote_574_574"></a><a href="#FNanchor_574_574"><span class="label">[574]</span></a> Every one must notice the glaring inconsistency between this -<i>defiance</i> of Jehovah and the previous claim to the possession of His -sanction. On Hamath, Arpad, etc., see Schrader, ii. 7-10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_575_575" id="Footnote_575_575"></a><a href="#FNanchor_575_575"><span class="label">[575]</span></a> Isa. xxxiii. 8: "He hath broken the covenant, he hath despised -the cities, he regardeth no man."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_576_576" id="Footnote_576_576"></a><a href="#FNanchor_576_576"><span class="label">[576]</span></a> 1 Kings xx. 32; 2 Kings vi. 30.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_577_577" id="Footnote_577_577"></a><a href="#FNanchor_577_577"><span class="label">[577]</span></a> Sennacherib had already carried off vast numbers. See Isa. -xxiv. 1-12; Demetrius <i>ap.</i> Clem. Alex., <i>Strom.</i>, i. 403.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_578_578" id="Footnote_578_578"></a><a href="#FNanchor_578_578"><span class="label">[578]</span></a> Isaiah's phrase, <i>na'ar melek</i>, "lads of the king," is contemptuous. -LXX., παιδάρια.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_579_579" id="Footnote_579_579"></a><a href="#FNanchor_579_579"><span class="label">[579]</span></a> Heb., <i>ruach</i>; LXX., δίδωμι ἐν αὐτῷ πνεῦμα. Theodoret calls this -"spirit" <i>cowardice</i> (τὴν δειλίαν οἶμαι δηλοῦν).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_580_580" id="Footnote_580_580"></a><a href="#FNanchor_580_580"><span class="label">[580]</span></a> Libnah means "whiteness." Dean Stanley (<i>S. and P.</i>, 207, 258) -identifies it with a white-faced hill, the Blanchegarde of the Crusaders.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_581_581" id="Footnote_581_581"></a><a href="#FNanchor_581_581"><span class="label">[581]</span></a> The dates usually given are Sabaco, <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 725-712; Shabatok, -712-698; Tirhakah, 698-672. Manetho, Τάραχος; Strabo, Τεράκων, ὁ -Αἰθιώψ. He was third king of the twenty-fifth dynasty, and the -greatest of the Egyptian sovereigns who came from Ethiopia. He -reigned gloriously for many years. We see his figure at Medinet -Abou, smiting ten captive princes with an iron mace; but he was -finally defeated by Esarhaddon, and in 668 by Assurbanipal at -Karbanit (Canopus). He is called by his conqueror "Tar-ku-u, King -of Egypt and Cush" (Schrader, <i>K. A. T.</i>, 336 ff.).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_582_582" id="Footnote_582_582"></a><a href="#FNanchor_582_582"><span class="label">[582]</span></a> Heb., <i>Sepharm</i>; Vulg., <i>litter</i>; 2 Chron. xxxii. 17. The more -ordinary term for a letter is <i>iggereth</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_583_583" id="Footnote_583_583"></a><a href="#FNanchor_583_583"><span class="label">[583]</span></a> 2 Kings xix. 12 (Heb.); Ezek. xxvii. 23. On these places see -Schrader, ii. 11, 12. It had been indeed Sennacherib's work "to reduce fenced cities to ruinous heaps." He boasts on the Bellino -Cylinder, "Their smaller towns without number I overthrew, and -reduced them to heaps of rubbish" (<i>Records of the Past</i>, i. 27).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_584_584" id="Footnote_584_584"></a><a href="#FNanchor_584_584"><span class="label">[584]</span></a> "It is a prayer without words, a prayer in action, which then -passes into a spoken prayer" (Delitzsch).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_585_585" id="Footnote_585_585"></a><a href="#FNanchor_585_585"><span class="label">[585]</span></a> The Assyrians are sometimes represented in their monuments -as hewing idols to pieces in honour of their god Assur (Botta, -<i>Monum.</i>, pl. 140).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_586_586" id="Footnote_586_586"></a><a href="#FNanchor_586_586"><span class="label">[586]</span></a> LXX., κινεῖν τὴν κεφαλήν, "a gesture of scorn" (Psalm xxii. 7, -cix. 25; Lam. ii. 15). With the vaunts of Sennacherib compare -Claudian, <i>De bell. Geth.</i>, 526-532. -</p> -<div class="poem"><div class="stanza"> -<span class="i20">"Cum cesserit omnis<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Obsequiis natura meis? Subsidere nostris<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Sub pedibus montes, <i>arescere vidimus amnes</i> ...<br /></span> -<span class="i0">Fregi Alpes, <i>galeis Padum victricibus hausi</i>."<br /></span> -<span class="i38"><span class="smcap">Keil</span>, <i>ad loc.</i><br /></span> -</div></div> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_587_587" id="Footnote_587_587"></a><a href="#FNanchor_587_587"><span class="label">[587]</span></a> Comp. 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11 (Heb.); Psalm xxxix. 1; Isa. xxx. 28; -Ezek. xxxviii. 4, xxix. 4. The Assyrians drove a ring through the -lower lip, the Babylonians through the nose. See Rawlinson, <i>Ancient -Monarchies</i>, ii. 314, iii. 436.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_588_588" id="Footnote_588_588"></a><a href="#FNanchor_588_588"><span class="label">[588]</span></a> 2 Kings xix. 33. "The river of Egypt" (<i>Nachal-ha-Mizraim</i>) -is the Wady-el-Arish.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_589_589" id="Footnote_589_589"></a><a href="#FNanchor_589_589"><span class="label">[589]</span></a> Isa. x. 33, 34, xi. 1, xiv. 8; Stanley, <i>Lectures</i>, ii. 410.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_590_590" id="Footnote_590_590"></a><a href="#FNanchor_590_590"><span class="label">[590]</span></a> אוֹת. A sign "is a thing, an event, or an action intended as a -pledge of the Divine certainty of another. Sometimes it is a miracle -(Gen. iv. 15, Heb.), or a permanent symbol (Isa. viii. 18, xx. 3, -xxxvii. 30; Jer. xliv. 29)" (Delitzsch).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_591_591" id="Footnote_591_591"></a><a href="#FNanchor_591_591"><span class="label">[591]</span></a> The first year they should eat <i>saphach</i> (LXX., αὐτόματα; Vulg., -<i>qu repereris</i>); the second year, <i>sachsh</i> (LXX., τὰ ἀνατέλλοντα; Vulg., -<i>qu sponte nascuntur</i>).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_592_592" id="Footnote_592_592"></a><a href="#FNanchor_592_592"><span class="label">[592]</span></a> 2 Kings xix. 35: "It came to pass that night." Isaiah only has -"then"; Josephus, κατὰ τὴν πρώτην τῆς πολιορκίας νύκτα. Menochius -understands it "<i>in celebri illa nocte</i>." The LXX. omits "that," and -simply says "in the night" (νυκτός). Comp. Psalm xlvi. 5 (Heb.); -Isa. xvii. 14.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_593_593" id="Footnote_593_593"></a><a href="#FNanchor_593_593"><span class="label">[593]</span></a> Josephus, followed by many moderns, and even by Keil, suggests -a plague. The malaria of the Pelusiotic marshes easily breeds -pestilence. The "<i>maleak Jehovah</i>" is "the destroyer" (<i>mashchith</i>) -(Exod. xii. 23; 2 Sam. xxiv. 16.) Comp. Justin., xix. 11; Diod. Sic., -xix. 434.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_594_594" id="Footnote_594_594"></a><a href="#FNanchor_594_594"><span class="label">[594]</span></a> Comp. 2 Sam. xxiv. 15, 16.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_595_595" id="Footnote_595_595"></a><a href="#FNanchor_595_595"><span class="label">[595]</span></a> The Babyl. Talmud and some Targums, followed by Vitringa, etc., -attribute to it storms of lightning; Prideaux, Heine, and Faber, to the -simoom; R. Jos, Ussher, etc., to a nocturnal attack of Tirhakah.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_596_596" id="Footnote_596_596"></a><a href="#FNanchor_596_596"><span class="label">[596]</span></a> It is, however, perfectly possible that a contingent was left on -guard. "Where is the [past] terror? Where is he that rated the -tribute? Where is he that received it?" (Isa. xxxiii. 18). "At the -noise of the tumult the people flee" (Isa. xxxiii. 3); "At Thy rebuke, -O God of Jacob, both chariot and horse are cast into a dead sleep" -(Psalm lxxvi. 6). Comp. Psalm xlviii. 4-6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_597_597" id="Footnote_597_597"></a><a href="#FNanchor_597_597"><span class="label">[597]</span></a> This is the meaning of "he departed, and went, and returned."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_598_598" id="Footnote_598_598"></a><a href="#FNanchor_598_598"><span class="label">[598]</span></a> Not, only fifty-five days, as we read in Tobit i. 21.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_599_599" id="Footnote_599_599"></a><a href="#FNanchor_599_599"><span class="label">[599]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, X. i. 5: "In his own temple to Arask"; LXX., -Ἀσαράχ; Isa. xxxvii. 38. One guess connects the word with Nesher, -"the eagle-god," often seen on the Assyrian bas-reliefs. Lenormant -calls him "the god of human destiny."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_600_600" id="Footnote_600_600"></a><a href="#FNanchor_600_600"><span class="label">[600]</span></a> Alex. Polyhistor <i>ap.</i> Euseb., i. 27; Kimchi <i>ad</i> 2 Kings xix. 37. -Buxtorf (<i>Bibl. Rabbinic.</i>) says that Sennacherib entered the temple -to ask his counsellors why Jehovah favoured Israel. Being told that -it was because of Abraham's willingness to offer Isaac, he said, -"Then I will offer my two sons." Rashi adds that they slew him -to save their own lives. (See Schenkel and Riehm, <i>s.v.</i> "Sanherib"—both -articles by Schrader).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_601_601" id="Footnote_601_601"></a><a href="#FNanchor_601_601"><span class="label">[601]</span></a> See Schrader in Riehm's <i>Handwrterbuch</i>, <i>s.vv.</i> "Sanherib," "Asarhaddon." Esarhaddon, judging from what is called "Sennacherib's -will," in which the king leaves him splendid presents, seems -to have been a favourite of his father (<i>Records of the Past</i>, i. 136). He -says that on hearing of his father's murder, "I was wrathful as a lion, -and my soul raged within me, and I lifted my hands to the great gods -to assume the sovereignty of my father's house." See <a href="#APPENDIX_I">Appendix I</a>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_602_602" id="Footnote_602_602"></a><a href="#FNanchor_602_602"><span class="label">[602]</span></a> The Book of Tobit (i. 21) calls him Sarchedonas.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_603_603" id="Footnote_603_603"></a><a href="#FNanchor_603_603"><span class="label">[603]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_604_604" id="Footnote_604_604"></a><a href="#FNanchor_604_604"><span class="label">[604]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxii. 23.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_605_605" id="Footnote_605_605"></a><a href="#FNanchor_605_605"><span class="label">[605]</span></a> Wellhausen, p. 116.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_606_606" id="Footnote_606_606"></a><a href="#FNanchor_606_606"><span class="label">[606]</span></a> Herod., ii. 14. "Sin" (Tanis?), Ezek. xxx. 15. It lay in the -midst of morasses, and some attribute the catastrophe to the malaria.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_607_607" id="Footnote_607_607"></a><a href="#FNanchor_607_607"><span class="label">[607]</span></a> The deliverance is really connected with Tirhakah, whose deeds -are recorded in a temple at Medinet Habou, but the jealousy of the -Memphites attributed it to the piety of Sethos. See G. W. Wilkinson, -<i>Ancient Egyptians</i>, i. 141; Rawlinson, <i>Herodotus</i>, i. 394.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_608_608" id="Footnote_608_608"></a><a href="#FNanchor_608_608"><span class="label">[608]</span></a> <i>Antt.</i>, X. i. 1-5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_609_609" id="Footnote_609_609"></a><a href="#FNanchor_609_609"><span class="label">[609]</span></a> Comp. 1 Sam. v., vi., where, after a plague, the Philistines sent an -expiation of five golden mice.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_610_610" id="Footnote_610_610"></a><a href="#FNanchor_610_610"><span class="label">[610]</span></a> We may add that even the Chronicler drops a veil over Sennacherib's -actual capture of fortresses in Judah ("he <i>thought</i> to win -them for himself," 2 Chron. xxxii. 1: comp. 2 Kings xviii. 13; -Isa. xxxvi. 1).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_611_611" id="Footnote_611_611"></a><a href="#FNanchor_611_611"><span class="label">[611]</span></a> Isa. vi. 11-13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_612_612" id="Footnote_612_612"></a><a href="#FNanchor_612_612"><span class="label">[612]</span></a> Isa. v. 26-30.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_613_613" id="Footnote_613_613"></a><a href="#FNanchor_613_613"><span class="label">[613]</span></a> Isa. vii. 18.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_614_614" id="Footnote_614_614"></a><a href="#FNanchor_614_614"><span class="label">[614]</span></a> Isa. viii., xxviii. 1-15, x. 28-34.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_615_615" id="Footnote_615_615"></a><a href="#FNanchor_615_615"><span class="label">[615]</span></a> Isa. xiv. 29-32, xxix., xxx.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_616_616" id="Footnote_616_616"></a><a href="#FNanchor_616_616"><span class="label">[616]</span></a> Isa. i. 19, 20.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_617_617" id="Footnote_617_617"></a><a href="#FNanchor_617_617"><span class="label">[617]</span></a> Isa. x. 33, xxix. 5-8, xxx. 20-26, 30-33.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_618_618" id="Footnote_618_618"></a><a href="#FNanchor_618_618"><span class="label">[618]</span></a> Isa. xxxviii. 6. See for this paragraph an admirable chapter in -Prof. Smith's <i>Isaiah</i>, pp. 368-374.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_619_619" id="Footnote_619_619"></a><a href="#FNanchor_619_619"><span class="label">[619]</span></a> Isa. xlvii. 13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_620_620" id="Footnote_620_620"></a><a href="#FNanchor_620_620"><span class="label">[620]</span></a> Stanley, <i>Lectures</i>, ii. 531.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_621_621" id="Footnote_621_621"></a><a href="#FNanchor_621_621"><span class="label">[621]</span></a> Isa. xl. 15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_622_622" id="Footnote_622_622"></a><a href="#FNanchor_622_622"><span class="label">[622]</span></a> Isa. xix. 24, 25.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_623_623" id="Footnote_623_623"></a><a href="#FNanchor_623_623"><span class="label">[623]</span></a> Ecclus. xlix. 4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_624_624" id="Footnote_624_624"></a><a href="#FNanchor_624_624"><span class="label">[624]</span></a> One legend says that Hephzibah was a daughter of Isaiah. Not -so Josephus (<i>Antt.</i>, X. iii. 1).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_625_625" id="Footnote_625_625"></a><a href="#FNanchor_625_625"><span class="label">[625]</span></a> See Gen. xli. 51. His name may have referred to the new union -between the Northern and Southern Kingdoms. Comp. 2 Chron. -xxx. 6, xxxi. 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_626_626" id="Footnote_626_626"></a><a href="#FNanchor_626_626"><span class="label">[626]</span></a> Chron. xxxiv. 1-3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_627_627" id="Footnote_627_627"></a><a href="#FNanchor_627_627"><span class="label">[627]</span></a> See Zeph. i. 8. Comp. 2 Chron. xxiv. 17; Isa. xxviii. 14; Jer. -v. 5, etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_628_628" id="Footnote_628_628"></a><a href="#FNanchor_628_628"><span class="label">[628]</span></a> Mic. vii. 1-20.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_629_629" id="Footnote_629_629"></a><a href="#FNanchor_629_629"><span class="label">[629]</span></a> LXX., τῇ Βαά̈λ. The feminine, however, does not imply that Baal -was here worshipped as a female deity, but is probably due to the -fact that later Jews always avoided using the <i>names</i> of idols (from -a misapprehension or too literal view of Exod. xxiii. 13), and therefore -called Baal <i>Bosheth</i> ("shame"), which is feminine. Hence the -names Mephibosheth, Jerubbesheth, Ishbosheth. In Suidas (<i>s.v.</i> -Μανασσῆς) he is charged with having set up in the Temple "a four-faced -image of Zeus."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_630_630" id="Footnote_630_630"></a><a href="#FNanchor_630_630"><span class="label">[630]</span></a> For בָּתִּים, in 2 Kings xxiii. 7, the LXX. read χεττίμ (?). Grtz, -(<i>Gesch. d. Juden.</i>, ii. 277) suggests בְּנָדִים, "broidered robes." -Ezek. xvi. 16. See Herod., i. 199; Strabo, xvi. 1058; Luc., <i>De De. -Syr.</i>, 6; Libanius, <i>Opp.</i>, xi. 456, 557; <i>Ep. of Jeremy</i>, 43; Dllinger, -<i>Judenthum u. Heidenthum</i>, i. 431; Rawlinson, <i>Phœnicia</i>, 431.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_631_631" id="Footnote_631_631"></a><a href="#FNanchor_631_631"><span class="label">[631]</span></a> Chron. xxxiii. 3; 2 Kings xxiii. 5. Movers, <i>Rel. d. Phniz.</i>, i. 65 -"In all the books of the Old Testament written before the Assyrian -period no trace of star-worship is to be to found." 2 Kings xvii. 16.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_632_632" id="Footnote_632_632"></a><a href="#FNanchor_632_632"><span class="label">[632]</span></a> Jer. vii. 18, viii. 2, xix. 13; Zeph. i, 5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_633_633" id="Footnote_633_633"></a><a href="#FNanchor_633_633"><span class="label">[633]</span></a> See Deut. iv. 19, xvii. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_634_634" id="Footnote_634_634"></a><a href="#FNanchor_634_634"><span class="label">[634]</span></a> 2 Kings xxiii. 11, 12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_635_635" id="Footnote_635_635"></a><a href="#FNanchor_635_635"><span class="label">[635]</span></a> See Jer. vii, 31, 32, xix. 2-6, xxxii. 35; Psalm cvi. 37, 38.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_636_636" id="Footnote_636_636"></a><a href="#FNanchor_636_636"><span class="label">[636]</span></a> Ewald infers from Isa. lvii. 5-9; Jer. ii. 5-13, that he actually -<i>sought</i> for all foreign kinds of worship, in order to introduce them.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_637_637" id="Footnote_637_637"></a><a href="#FNanchor_637_637"><span class="label">[637]</span></a> 1 Sam. iii. 11; Jer. xix. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_638_638" id="Footnote_638_638"></a><a href="#FNanchor_638_638"><span class="label">[638]</span></a> Comp. Isa. xxxiv. 11; Lam. ii. 8.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_639_639" id="Footnote_639_639"></a><a href="#FNanchor_639_639"><span class="label">[639]</span></a> 2 Kings xxi. 13. LXX., ἀλάβαστρος, <i>al.</i> πυξίον. The Vulgate also -takes it to mean the obliteration of writing on a tablet: "Delebo -Jerusalem sicut deleri solent tabul; et ducam crebrius stylum -super faciem ejus."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_640_640" id="Footnote_640_640"></a><a href="#FNanchor_640_640"><span class="label">[640]</span></a> 2 Kings xxi. 16; Heb., "from mouth to mouth"; LXX., στόμα εἰς -στόμα; Vulg., <i>donec impleret Jerusalem usque ad os</i>. Comp. 2 Kings -x. 21.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_641_641" id="Footnote_641_641"></a><a href="#FNanchor_641_641"><span class="label">[641]</span></a> <i>Antt.</i>, X. iii, 1: "He butchered alike all the just among the Hebrews." -To this reign of terror some refer Psalm xii. 1; Isa. lvii. 1-4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_642_642" id="Footnote_642_642"></a><a href="#FNanchor_642_642"><span class="label">[642]</span></a> This (as I have said) cannot be regarded as certain. Isaiah -began to prophesy in the year that King Uzziah died, sixty years -before Manasseh. It is a Jewish Haggadah. See Gesen on Isa. i., -p. 9, and the Apocryphal "Ascension of Isaiah."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_643_643" id="Footnote_643_643"></a><a href="#FNanchor_643_643"><span class="label">[643]</span></a> Esarhaddon reigned only eight years, till 668, and then resigned -in favour of his son Assurbanipal. In his reign Psammetichus -recovered Egypt, and put an end to the Dodecarchy. In the reign -of his successor, Assuredililani, Assyria began to decline (647-625).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_644_644" id="Footnote_644_644"></a><a href="#FNanchor_644_644"><span class="label">[644]</span></a> Comp. Isa. xxxix. 6; Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, X. iii. 2. The phrase "among -the thorns" means "<i>with rings</i>" (comp. Isa. xxx. 28, xxxvii. 29; Ezek. -xxxviii. 4; Amos iv. 2). Assurbanipal says similarly that he seized -Necho, "bound him with bonds and iron chains, hands and feet," -but afterwards allowed him to return to Egypt (Schrader, ii. 59).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_645_645" id="Footnote_645_645"></a><a href="#FNanchor_645_645"><span class="label">[645]</span></a> Late and worthless Haggadoth, echoed by still later writers -(Suidas and Syncellus), say he was kept in a brazen cage, fed on -bran bread dipped in vinegar, etc. See <i>Apost. Constt.</i>, ii. 22: "And -the Lord hearkened to his voice, and there became about him a flame -of fire, and all the irons about him melted." John Damasc., <i>Parall.</i>, ii. 15, quotes from Julius Africanus, that while Manasseh was saying -a psalm his iron bonds burst, and he escaped. See <i>Speakers Commentary</i>, -on Apocrypha, ii. 363.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_646_646" id="Footnote_646_646"></a><a href="#FNanchor_646_646"><span class="label">[646]</span></a> Such pardon from a king of Assyria was rare, but not unparalleled. -Pharaoh Necho I. was taken in chains to Nineveh, and afterwards set -free (Schrader, <i>K. A. T.</i>, p. 371).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_647_647" id="Footnote_647_647"></a><a href="#FNanchor_647_647"><span class="label">[647]</span></a> See 2 Chron. xxvii. 3. The "fish gate" was, perhaps, a weak -point (Zeph. i. 10).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_648_648" id="Footnote_648_648"></a><a href="#FNanchor_648_648"><span class="label">[648]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxiii. 19. Heb., <i>dibhr Chozai</i>; A.V., "the story of the -Seers"; R.V., "in the history of Hozai"; LXX., ἐπὶ τῶν λόγων τῶν -οὐρανιῶν; Vulg., <i>in sermonibus Hozai</i>. The elements of doubt suggested -by the name "Babylon," and by the liberation of Manasseh, -have been removed by further knowledge. See Budge, <i>Hist. of -Esarhaddon</i>, p. 78; Schrader, <i>K. A. T.</i>, 369 ff.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_649_649" id="Footnote_649_649"></a><a href="#FNanchor_649_649"><span class="label">[649]</span></a> Since the Council of Trent this prayer has been relegated to the -end of the Vulgate with 3, 4, Esdras. Verse 8 (the supposed sinlessness -of the Patriarchs) at once shows it to be a mere composition.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_650_650" id="Footnote_650_650"></a><a href="#FNanchor_650_650"><span class="label">[650]</span></a> 2 Kings xxiii. 12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_651_651" id="Footnote_651_651"></a><a href="#FNanchor_651_651"><span class="label">[651]</span></a> 2 Kings xxi. 20.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_652_652" id="Footnote_652_652"></a><a href="#FNanchor_652_652"><span class="label">[652]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxiii. 15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_653_653" id="Footnote_653_653"></a><a href="#FNanchor_653_653"><span class="label">[653]</span></a> 2 Kings xxiii. 26.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_654_654" id="Footnote_654_654"></a><a href="#FNanchor_654_654"><span class="label">[654]</span></a> Jer. xv. 1-9.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_655_655" id="Footnote_655_655"></a><a href="#FNanchor_655_655"><span class="label">[655]</span></a> The later Jews certainly took no account of his repentance. His -name was execrated (see the substitution of Manasseh for Moses in -Judg. xviii. 30), and he was denied all part in the world to come. -The Apocryphal "Prayer of Manasses" has no authority, though it -is interesting (Butler, <i>Analogy</i>, pt. ii., ch. v.).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_656_656" id="Footnote_656_656"></a><a href="#FNanchor_656_656"><span class="label">[656]</span></a> In estimating the Chronicler's story, we cannot wholly forget the -fact that a number of Haggadic legends clustered thickly round the -name of Manasseh in the literature of the later Jews. He is charged -with incest, with the murder of Isaiah, the distortion of Scripture, etc., -and is represented as having got to heaven, not by real repentance, -but by challenging God on His superiority to idols. The Targum, -after 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11, adds, "And the Chaldees made a copper -mule, and pierced it all over with little holes, and put him therein. -And when he was in straits, he cried in vain to all his idols. Then -he prayed to Jehovah and humbled himself; but the angels shut every -window and lattice of heaven, that his prayer might not enter. But -forthwith the pity of the Lord of the world rolled forth, and He made -an aperture in heaven, and the mule burst asunder, and the Spirit -breathed on him, and he forsook all his idols." "No books," says Dr. -Neubauer, "are more subject to additions and various adaptations -than popular histories." See Mr. Ball's commentary (<i>Speaker's -Commentary</i>, ii. 309, and <i>Sanhedrin</i>, f. 99, 2; 101, 1; 103, 2).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_657_657" id="Footnote_657_657"></a><a href="#FNanchor_657_657"><span class="label">[657]</span></a> The name Amon is unusual. Some identify it with the name -of the Egyptian sun-god (Nah. iii. 8). If so, we see yet another -element of Manasseh's syncretism, and (as some fancy) an attempt -to open relations with Psammetichus of Egypt. But perhaps the -name may be Hebrew for "Architect" (1 Kings xxii. 26; Neh. vii. 59).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_658_658" id="Footnote_658_658"></a><a href="#FNanchor_658_658"><span class="label">[658]</span></a> 2 Kings xxi. 19. The LXX. reads "twelve years," but not so -Josephus (<i>Antt.</i>, X. iv. 1), or 2 Chron. xxxiii. 21.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_659_659" id="Footnote_659_659"></a><a href="#FNanchor_659_659"><span class="label">[659]</span></a> Zeph. iii. 1-11. Comp. i. 4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_660_660" id="Footnote_660_660"></a><a href="#FNanchor_660_660"><span class="label">[660]</span></a> <i>Chemarim</i>, 2 Kings xxiii. 5; Hos. x. 5. The root in Syriac -means "to be sad," but Kimchi derives it from a root "to be black." -The Vulgate renders it <i>ditui</i> and <i>aruspices</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_661_661" id="Footnote_661_661"></a><a href="#FNanchor_661_661"><span class="label">[661]</span></a> We are told in the titles of their books that both these prophets -prophesied in the days of Josiah; but such pictures can only apply to -the earliest years of his reign.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_662_662" id="Footnote_662_662"></a><a href="#FNanchor_662_662"><span class="label">[662]</span></a> See Jer. v., vi., vii., <i>passim</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_663_663" id="Footnote_663_663"></a><a href="#FNanchor_663_663"><span class="label">[663]</span></a> Jer. vi. 13-15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_664_664" id="Footnote_664_664"></a><a href="#FNanchor_664_664"><span class="label">[664]</span></a> Jer. v. 30, 31.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_665_665" id="Footnote_665_665"></a><a href="#FNanchor_665_665"><span class="label">[665]</span></a> Kamphausen (<i>Die Chronologie der hebrischer Knige</i>) makes -Josiah succeed to the throne in 638.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_666_666" id="Footnote_666_666"></a><a href="#FNanchor_666_666"><span class="label">[666]</span></a> Otherwise his genealogy would not be mentioned for four -generations (Hitzig).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_667_667" id="Footnote_667_667"></a><a href="#FNanchor_667_667"><span class="label">[667]</span></a> Zeph. i. 1. Jeremiah also was highly connected. He was a priest -and his father Hilkiah may be the high priest who found the book; -"for his uncle Shallum, father of his cousin Hanameel, was the -husband of Huldah the prophetess" (2 Kings xxii. 14; Jer. xxxii. 7). -The fact that Jeremiah's property was at Anathoth, where lived the -descendants of Ithamar (1 Kings ii. 26), whereas Hilkiah was of -the family of Eleazar (1 Chron. vi. 4-13), does not seem fatal to the -view that his father was the high priest.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_668_668" id="Footnote_668_668"></a><a href="#FNanchor_668_668"><span class="label">[668]</span></a> Zeph. ii. 4-7.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_669_669" id="Footnote_669_669"></a><a href="#FNanchor_669_669"><span class="label">[669]</span></a> Zeph. ii. 12-15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_670_670" id="Footnote_670_670"></a><a href="#FNanchor_670_670"><span class="label">[670]</span></a> Jer. ii. 1-35. Considering the very great part played by Jeremiah -for nearly half a century of the last history of Judah, the -non-mention of his name in the Book of Kings is a circumstance far -from easy to explain.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_671_671" id="Footnote_671_671"></a><a href="#FNanchor_671_671"><span class="label">[671]</span></a> Jer. iv. 6, A. V., "retire, stay not." Comp. Isa. x. 24-31.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_672_672" id="Footnote_672_672"></a><a href="#FNanchor_672_672"><span class="label">[672]</span></a> Jer. iv. 7-27.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_673_673" id="Footnote_673_673"></a><a href="#FNanchor_673_673"><span class="label">[673]</span></a> Jer. v. 15-17.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_674_674" id="Footnote_674_674"></a><a href="#FNanchor_674_674"><span class="label">[674]</span></a> Jer. vi. 1, 22, 23, 24.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_675_675" id="Footnote_675_675"></a><a href="#FNanchor_675_675"><span class="label">[675]</span></a> The almond tree (<i>shqd</i>) "seems to be awake (<i>shqd</i>), whatsoever -trees are still sleeping in the torpor of winter" (Tristram -<i>Nat. Hist. of the Bible</i>, 332; Jer. i. 11-14).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_676_676" id="Footnote_676_676"></a><a href="#FNanchor_676_676"><span class="label">[676]</span></a> The name Kimmerii (on the Assyrian inscriptions Gimirrai) is -connected with Gomer. The Persians call them Sakai or Scyths. -The nomad Scyths had driven the Kimmerii from the Dniester while -Psammetichus was King of Egypt. For allusions to this see Jer. vi. 22 -<i>seq.</i>, viii. 16, ix. 10. The first notice of them is in an inscription of -Esarhaddon, <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 677, who says that he defeated "Tiushpa, <i>the -Gimirrai, a roving warrior</i>, whose own country was remote." Zephaniah -and Jeremiah were certainly thinking of the Scythians (Eichhorn, -Hitzig, Ewald; and more recently Kuenen, <i>Onderzoek</i>, ii. 123; Wellhausen, -<i>Skizzen</i>, 150). In <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 626 they could not have consciously -had the Chaldans in view, though, twenty-three years later, Jeremiah -may have had.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_677_677" id="Footnote_677_677"></a><a href="#FNanchor_677_677"><span class="label">[677]</span></a> See Ezek. xxxviii., xxxix.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_678_678" id="Footnote_678_678"></a><a href="#FNanchor_678_678"><span class="label">[678]</span></a> Ezek. xxxviii. 2. So Gesenius, Hvernick, etc., and R.V.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_679_679" id="Footnote_679_679"></a><a href="#FNanchor_679_679"><span class="label">[679]</span></a> The form in the Vulgate and the Alexandrian MS. of the LXX. is -Mosech; in the Assyrian inscription, Muski. As far back as 1120 -Tiglath-Pileser I. had overrun Tubal (the Tublai, Tabareni) and -Moschi, between the Black Sea and the Taurus. They were neither -Aryans nor Semites. In Gen. x. 2; 1 Chron. i. 5, Gog, Magog, -Meshech, and Gomer are sons of Japheth. They are referred to in -Rev. xx. 8.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_680_680" id="Footnote_680_680"></a><a href="#FNanchor_680_680"><span class="label">[680]</span></a> Herod., i. 74, 103-106, iv. 1-22, vii. 64; Pliny, <i>H. N.</i>, v. 16; Jos., -<i>Antt.</i>, I. vi. 1; Syncellus, <i>Chronogl.</i>, i. 405.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_681_681" id="Footnote_681_681"></a><a href="#FNanchor_681_681"><span class="label">[681]</span></a> Sayce, <i>Ethnology of the Bible; Records of the Past</i>, ix. 40; Schrader, -<i>K. A. T.</i>, 159. Some identify Gog with Gyges, King of Lydia, who -was killed in battle <i>against</i> the Scythians, but whose name stood for a -geographical symbol of Asia Minor, sometimes called Lud. It is said -that in 665 Gyges (Gugu) sent two Scythian chiefs as a present to -Nineveh.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_682_682" id="Footnote_682_682"></a><a href="#FNanchor_682_682"><span class="label">[682]</span></a> Hence, in 2 Macc. iv. 47, 3 Macc. vii. 5, Scythian is used with the -modern connotation of "Barbarian."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_683_683" id="Footnote_683_683"></a><a href="#FNanchor_683_683"><span class="label">[683]</span></a> Ezek. xxxii. 26, 27; Cheyne, <i>Jeremiah</i> ("Men of the Bible") -p. 31.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_684_684" id="Footnote_684_684"></a><a href="#FNanchor_684_684"><span class="label">[684]</span></a> <i>Expositor</i>, 2nd series, iv. 263; Cheyne, <i>Jeremiah</i>, 31. Hitzig and -Ewald (erroneously?) refer Psalms lv., lix., to these events, and it -seems also to be an error to suppose that the later name of Bethshan—Scythopolis—has -anything to do with this incursion. Like the -names of Pella, Philadelphia, etc., it is later than the age of -Alexander the Great. See 2 Macc. xii. 30; Jos., <i>B. J.</i>, II. xviii., <i>Vit.</i> vi. -Perhaps Scythopolis is a corruption of Sikytopolis, the city of -Sikkuth; or Scythian may merely stand for "Barbarian," as in -3 Macc. vii. 5; Col. iii. 11 (Cheyne, <i>l.c.</i>).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_685_685" id="Footnote_685_685"></a><a href="#FNanchor_685_685"><span class="label">[685]</span></a> Nah. i. 10, ii. 5, iii. 12; Diod. Sic., ii. 26.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_686_686" id="Footnote_686_686"></a><a href="#FNanchor_686_686"><span class="label">[686]</span></a> Nah. iii. 8-11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_687_687" id="Footnote_687_687"></a><a href="#FNanchor_687_687"><span class="label">[687]</span></a> Strabo, xvi. 1, 3: ἠφανίσθη παοαχρῆμα.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_688_688" id="Footnote_688_688"></a><a href="#FNanchor_688_688"><span class="label">[688]</span></a> Xen., <i>Anab.</i>, III. iv. 7.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_689_689" id="Footnote_689_689"></a><a href="#FNanchor_689_689"><span class="label">[689]</span></a> Chaldees, Kardim, Kasdim, Kurds.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_690_690" id="Footnote_690_690"></a><a href="#FNanchor_690_690"><span class="label">[690]</span></a> Nabu-pal-ussur, "Nebo protect the son" <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 625-7. Jos., <i>Antt.</i> -X. xi. 1: comp. <i>Ap.</i>, i. 19.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_691_691" id="Footnote_691_691"></a><a href="#FNanchor_691_691"><span class="label">[691]</span></a> Newman, <i>Hebrew Monarchy</i>, p. 315.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_692_692" id="Footnote_692_692"></a><a href="#FNanchor_692_692"><span class="label">[692]</span></a> 2 Kings xxiii. 4. We have here the first mention of "the second -priest" (if, with Grtz, we read <i>Cohen mishneh</i>, as in 2 Kings xxv. -18; Jer. lii. 24). In later days he was called "the Sagan." At this -time he probably acted as "Captain of the Temple" (Grtz, ii. 319).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_693_693" id="Footnote_693_693"></a><a href="#FNanchor_693_693"><span class="label">[693]</span></a> Comp. 2 Kings xii. 15, where we find the same remark.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_694_694" id="Footnote_694_694"></a><a href="#FNanchor_694_694"><span class="label">[694]</span></a> Exod. xv. 20; Judg. iv. 4; Isa. viii. 3. "The prophetess" seems -to mean "prophet's wife." Noadiah was a false prophetess.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_695_695" id="Footnote_695_695"></a><a href="#FNanchor_695_695"><span class="label">[695]</span></a> Exod. xxviii. 2, etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_696_696" id="Footnote_696_696"></a><a href="#FNanchor_696_696"><span class="label">[696]</span></a> 2 Kings xxii. 14. Heb., <i>mishneh</i>, lit. "second"; A.V., "the college"; -R.V., "the second quarter." Perhaps it means "the lower -city" (Neh. xi. 9; Zeph. i. 10). It puzzled the LXX.: ἐν τῇ μασενᾷ. -Vulg., <i>in secunda</i>. Jerome says, "<i>Haud dubium quin urbis partem -significet qu interiori muro vallabatur</i>." Comp. Zeph. i. 10, "an -howling from the <i>second</i>" (<i>i.e.</i>, quarter of the city); Neh. xi. 9, where, -for "<i>second over the city</i>" (A. and R.V.), read "over the second part of -the city."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_697_697" id="Footnote_697_697"></a><a href="#FNanchor_697_697"><span class="label">[697]</span></a> Another reading is "in Jerusalem," which gets over an historic -difficulty.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_698_698" id="Footnote_698_698"></a><a href="#FNanchor_698_698"><span class="label">[698]</span></a> Comp. 2 Kings xi. 14; LXX., ἐπὶ τοῦ στύλου; Heb., <i>al-ha-ammud</i>; -Vulg., <i>super gradum</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_699_699" id="Footnote_699_699"></a><a href="#FNanchor_699_699"><span class="label">[699]</span></a> 2 Kings xxiii. 4; for "in the fields of Kedron" one version has -ἐν τῷ ἐμπυρισμῷ τοῦ χειμάῤῥου, "in the burning-place of the wady,"—perhaps -reading <i>bemisrephoth</i> for <i>bishedamoth</i>, and alluding to lime-kilns -in the wady. It is surprising that they should carry the -ashes "to Bethel." Thenius suggests the reading בֵּית־אַל, "place -of execution" (lit., "house of nothingness").</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_700_700" id="Footnote_700_700"></a><a href="#FNanchor_700_700"><span class="label">[700]</span></a> Hos. x. 5; Zeph. i. 4 (the only other places where the word -occurs). The <i>delevit</i> of the Vulgate (2 Kings xxiii. 5) only means -that he put them down, and the κατέκαυσε of the LXX. should be -κατέπαυσε.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_701_701" id="Footnote_701_701"></a><a href="#FNanchor_701_701"><span class="label">[701]</span></a> Comp. Jer. ii. 23, where the LXX. has ἐν τῷ πολυανδρίῳ. In -2 Chron. xxxiv. 4, perhaps the true reading is, not <i>Ben-ha-'m</i>, but -<i>Ben-hinnom</i>—which would mean that he scattered the dust in the -gehenna of Jerusalem. Comp. 1 Kings xv. 13.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_702_702" id="Footnote_702_702"></a><a href="#FNanchor_702_702"><span class="label">[702]</span></a> For these Galli, see Seneca, <i>De Vit. Beat.</i>, 27; Pliny, <i>H. N.</i>, xi. 49.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_703_703" id="Footnote_703_703"></a><a href="#FNanchor_703_703"><span class="label">[703]</span></a> Heb., <i>bathm</i>, lit. "tents" or "houses"; Vulg., <i>quasi domunculas</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_704_704" id="Footnote_704_704"></a><a href="#FNanchor_704_704"><span class="label">[704]</span></a> In 2 Kings xxiii. 8, Geiger would read "the high places of the -<i>satyrs</i>" (שׂצירים).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_705_705" id="Footnote_705_705"></a><a href="#FNanchor_705_705"><span class="label">[705]</span></a> Usually derived (as by Selden and Milton) from <i>toph</i>, "drum," -but perhaps from <i>tuph</i> (to <i>spit</i> in sign of abhorrence).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_706_706" id="Footnote_706_706"></a><a href="#FNanchor_706_706"><span class="label">[706]</span></a> <i>Parvar</i>—perhaps "open portico." Renan connects the word -with the Greek περίβολος. On horses dedicated to the sun, see Xen. -<i>Cyrop.</i>, viii. 3, 5, 12; <i>Anab.</i>, iv. 5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_707_707" id="Footnote_707_707"></a><a href="#FNanchor_707_707"><span class="label">[707]</span></a> See Zeph. i. 5; Jer. xix. 13, xxxii. 29.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_708_708" id="Footnote_708_708"></a><a href="#FNanchor_708_708"><span class="label">[708]</span></a> 2 Kings xxiii. 13: "The Mount of Corruption"; Vulg., <i>Mons -offensionis</i>; LXX., τοῦ ὄρους τοῦ Μοσθάθ. Some conjecture that -<i>Maschith</i> may be a derisive change for some word which meant -"anointing" (from being the <i>Oil</i> Mountain, <i>Har ham-mischchah</i>).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_709_709" id="Footnote_709_709"></a><a href="#FNanchor_709_709"><span class="label">[709]</span></a> In burning the bones of the dead, he violated all Jewish feeling. -Amos (ii. 1) had severely rebuked this form of revenge and insult -even in the case of the heathen King of Moab. Bones defiled the -touch (Num. xix. 16; Herod., iv. 73). Josiah's question at Bethel -was, "What <i>pillar</i> is that?" (<i>tsiyun</i>). LXX., σκόπελον. Comp. Gen. -xxxv. 20.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_710_710" id="Footnote_710_710"></a><a href="#FNanchor_710_710"><span class="label">[710]</span></a> 1 Kings xiii. 29-31.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_711_711" id="Footnote_711_711"></a><a href="#FNanchor_711_711"><span class="label">[711]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxv. 1-19.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_712_712" id="Footnote_712_712"></a><a href="#FNanchor_712_712"><span class="label">[712]</span></a> Jer. xi. 3, 4. Since, in this part of my subject, I make frequent -reference to the prophecies of Jeremiah which are indispensable to -the right understanding of the history, I may here say that modern -critics (Cheyne and others) arrange them as follows:— -</p> -<p> -In the reign of <i>Josiah</i>, Jer. ii. 1-iii. 5, iii. 6-vi. 30, vii. 1-ix. 25, xi. 1-17. -</p> -<p> -In the reign of <i>Jehoiakim</i>, xxvi. 2-6, xlvi. 2-12, xxv., xxxv., and -possibly xvi. 1, xviii. 19-27, xiv., xv., xviii., xi. 18-xii. 17. -</p> -<p> -In the reign of <i>Jehoiachin</i>, x. 17-23, xiii. -</p> -<p> -In the reign of <i>Zedekiah</i>, xxii.-xxiv., xxvii.-xxix. 1-11 (?), lii. -</p> -<p> -In the <i>Exile</i>, xxxix.-xliv.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_713_713" id="Footnote_713_713"></a><a href="#FNanchor_713_713"><span class="label">[713]</span></a> See Cheyne, <i>Jeremiah</i>, p. 56, <i>id.</i> 6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_714_714" id="Footnote_714_714"></a><a href="#FNanchor_714_714"><span class="label">[714]</span></a> Canon Cheyne shows that even Mohammed could not persuade -the Qurashites wholly to give up their black stone at the Kaaba, and -their dolmens and sacred trees (<i>id.</i> 103). He left the <i>auab</i>, or sacrificial -stones (<i>matstseboth</i>), though he warns his followers against them -(<i>Quran</i>, v. 92).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_715_715" id="Footnote_715_715"></a><a href="#FNanchor_715_715"><span class="label">[715]</span></a> Jer. xvii. 9-11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_716_716" id="Footnote_716_716"></a><a href="#FNanchor_716_716"><span class="label">[716]</span></a> Ewald, <i>The Prophets</i>, iii. 63, 64.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_717_717" id="Footnote_717_717"></a><a href="#FNanchor_717_717"><span class="label">[717]</span></a> Jer. xvii. 1-4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_718_718" id="Footnote_718_718"></a><a href="#FNanchor_718_718"><span class="label">[718]</span></a> The Qurashites and other heathen Arabs accounted holy a large -green tree, and every year had a sacrifice in its honour. "On the -way to Hunain we called to God's Messenger (Mohammed) that he -should appoint for us such trees. But he was terrified, and said, -'Lord God, Lord God! Ye speak even as the Israelites ... ye are -still in ignorance,—thus are heathen enslaved'" (Vakdi, <i>Book of the -Campaigns of God's Messenger</i>, quoted by Cheyne, <i>Jeremiah</i>, p. 103, -from Wellhausen).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_719_719" id="Footnote_719_719"></a><a href="#FNanchor_719_719"><span class="label">[719]</span></a> Psalm lxxxv. 8.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_720_720" id="Footnote_720_720"></a><a href="#FNanchor_720_720"><span class="label">[720]</span></a> Deut. xxx. 11-14. See Wellhausen, p. 165.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_721_721" id="Footnote_721_721"></a><a href="#FNanchor_721_721"><span class="label">[721]</span></a> Jer. vi. 20. The passages of Jeremiah which seem of a different -spirit may have been added by later hands—<i>e.g.</i>, xxxiii. 18, which is -not in the LXX.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_722_722" id="Footnote_722_722"></a><a href="#FNanchor_722_722"><span class="label">[722]</span></a> Jer. vii. 21; Ewald; and Cheyne, <i>l.c.</i> 120. So the Jews seem to -have understood it, for they appoint this passage to be read on the -<i>Haphtara</i> after the <i>Parashah</i> about sacrifices from Leviticus.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_723_723" id="Footnote_723_723"></a><a href="#FNanchor_723_723"><span class="label">[723]</span></a> Jer, vii. 22, 23. This alone would show that Jeremiah did not -(as earlier critics thought) <i>write</i> "Deuteronomy," in spite of the -numerous close resemblances in phraseology. Thus, Jeremiah often -denounces the priests (i. 18, ii. 8-26, iv. 9, v. 31, viii. 1, xiii. 13, -xxxii. 32). Cheyne, p. 82.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_724_724" id="Footnote_724_724"></a><a href="#FNanchor_724_724"><span class="label">[724]</span></a> Mic. iii. 11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_725_725" id="Footnote_725_725"></a><a href="#FNanchor_725_725"><span class="label">[725]</span></a> Jer. vii. 4, 8-15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_726_726" id="Footnote_726_726"></a><a href="#FNanchor_726_726"><span class="label">[726]</span></a> Jer. xxxi. 31, 32.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_727_727" id="Footnote_727_727"></a><a href="#FNanchor_727_727"><span class="label">[727]</span></a> Jer. xxii. 15, 16.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_728_728" id="Footnote_728_728"></a><a href="#FNanchor_728_728"><span class="label">[728]</span></a> He was forced to desist by a fearful mortality among the -labourers.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_729_729" id="Footnote_729_729"></a><a href="#FNanchor_729_729"><span class="label">[729]</span></a> <i>Circ.</i> <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 611-605. Herod., ii. 158, 159, iv. 42. Psamatik, the -father of Necho, was perhaps a Lybian. He established his sway -over all Egypt displacing the Assyrians.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_730_730" id="Footnote_730_730"></a><a href="#FNanchor_730_730"><span class="label">[730]</span></a> <i>Antt.</i>, X. v. 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_731_731" id="Footnote_731_731"></a><a href="#FNanchor_731_731"><span class="label">[731]</span></a> Herod., ii. 158. His father Psamatik had left him an adequate -army of natives and mercenaries.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_732_732" id="Footnote_732_732"></a><a href="#FNanchor_732_732"><span class="label">[732]</span></a> Herodotus says of his ships: Ἁι μὲν ἐπὶ τῇ βορηίῃ θαλάσσῃ ἐποιήθησαν.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_733_733" id="Footnote_733_733"></a><a href="#FNanchor_733_733"><span class="label">[733]</span></a> Judg. iv. 23; 1 Sam. xxix. 1-11; 1 Kings xx. 26; 2 Kings xxiii. -29; 2 Chron. xxxv. 22; Rev. xvi. 16 (Armageddon). Herodotus -confuses it with Migdol (Μάγδολον).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_734_734" id="Footnote_734_734"></a><a href="#FNanchor_734_734"><span class="label">[734]</span></a> 1 Macc. xii. 49; Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, XIII. vi. 2.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_735_735" id="Footnote_735_735"></a><a href="#FNanchor_735_735"><span class="label">[735]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxv. 20-22.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_736_736" id="Footnote_736_736"></a><a href="#FNanchor_736_736"><span class="label">[736]</span></a> According to 1 Esdras i. 25-32, "for upon Euphrates is my war."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_737_737" id="Footnote_737_737"></a><a href="#FNanchor_737_737"><span class="label">[737]</span></a> Klostermann, in 2 Chron. xxxv. 21, reads <i>bachalm</i>, "in a dream," -instead of "to make haste."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_738_738" id="Footnote_738_738"></a><a href="#FNanchor_738_738"><span class="label">[738]</span></a> Gen. xli. 1; Herod., ii. 188; <i>Records of the Past</i>, ix. 52.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_739_739" id="Footnote_739_739"></a><a href="#FNanchor_739_739"><span class="label">[739]</span></a> 2 Kings xviii. 25.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_740_740" id="Footnote_740_740"></a><a href="#FNanchor_740_740"><span class="label">[740]</span></a> <i>Antt.</i>, X. v. 1: Τῆς πεπρωμένης οἶμαι εἰς τοῦτ' αὐτόν παρορμησάσης.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_741_741" id="Footnote_741_741"></a><a href="#FNanchor_741_741"><span class="label">[741]</span></a> Deut. xxviii. 1-8.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_742_742" id="Footnote_742_742"></a><a href="#FNanchor_742_742"><span class="label">[742]</span></a> Psalm xx. 6, xviii. 29-50.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_743_743" id="Footnote_743_743"></a><a href="#FNanchor_743_743"><span class="label">[743]</span></a> Lev. xxvi. 36.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_744_744" id="Footnote_744_744"></a><a href="#FNanchor_744_744"><span class="label">[744]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxv. 22: "hearkened not <i>to the words of Necho from the -mouth of God</i>."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_745_745" id="Footnote_745_745"></a><a href="#FNanchor_745_745"><span class="label">[745]</span></a> "When he had <i>seen</i> him." Comp. 2 Kings xiv. 8.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_746_746" id="Footnote_746_746"></a><a href="#FNanchor_746_746"><span class="label">[746]</span></a> 1 Esdras i. 25; and LXX., "firmly resolved," "strengthened himself," -as in 2 Chron. xxv. 11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_747_747" id="Footnote_747_747"></a><a href="#FNanchor_747_747"><span class="label">[747]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, X. v. 1; and 2 Chron. xxxv. 23; 1 Esdras i. 30.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_748_748" id="Footnote_748_748"></a><a href="#FNanchor_748_748"><span class="label">[748]</span></a> The fortunes of the Jews again prevailed in this plain in the days -of Holofernes (Judith vii. 3); but they were defeated there by -Placidus (Jos., <i>B. J.</i>, IV. i. 8).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_749_749" id="Footnote_749_749"></a><a href="#FNanchor_749_749"><span class="label">[749]</span></a> Zech. xii. 11-13 (comp. Jer. xxii. 10, 18). No such place as -Hadadrimmon is known, though there is a Rummne not far from -Megiddo. Jerome (<i>Comm. in Zach.</i>) identifies it with a place which -he calls Maximianopolis. Wellhausen (<i>Skizzen</i>, 192) thinks that the -mourning is compared to some wail over the god Hadadrimmon, -like the wailing for Tammuz. Jonathan and Jarchi say that Hadadrimmon -was the son of Tabrimmon, who opposed Ahab at Ramoth-Gilead.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_750_750" id="Footnote_750_750"></a><a href="#FNanchor_750_750"><span class="label">[750]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxv. 24, 25. Jeremiah's elegy has probably perished. -It would have been most interesting had it been preserved. Lam. iv. -is too vague to have been this lost poem.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_751_751" id="Footnote_751_751"></a><a href="#FNanchor_751_751"><span class="label">[751]</span></a> Jer. iv. 10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_752_752" id="Footnote_752_752"></a><a href="#FNanchor_752_752"><span class="label">[752]</span></a> Jer. xx. 7, 8.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_753_753" id="Footnote_753_753"></a><a href="#FNanchor_753_753"><span class="label">[753]</span></a> Chron. iii. 15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_754_754" id="Footnote_754_754"></a><a href="#FNanchor_754_754"><span class="label">[754]</span></a> He is named "fourth," but he was older than his brothers -Jehoiakim and Zedekiah (2 Kings xxiii. 31, xxiv. 18). The genealogy -is as follows:— -</p> -<pre> - Zebudah = JOSIAH = Hamutal. - | | - ------ |-------------------- - | | | - Nehushta = ELIAKIM ZEDEKIAH JEHOAHAZ - | or Jehoiakim. or Mattaniah. or Shallum. - | - JEHOIACHIN. -</pre> - -<p><a name="Footnote_755_755" id="Footnote_755_755"></a><a href="#FNanchor_755_755"><span class="label">[755]</span></a> An allusion to the Syrian mode of hunting the lion by driving -it with cries into a concealed pit (Tristram, <i>Nat. Hist. of the Bible</i>, -118; Cheyne, 140).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_756_756" id="Footnote_756_756"></a><a href="#FNanchor_756_756"><span class="label">[756]</span></a> Ezek. xix. 1-4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_757_757" id="Footnote_757_757"></a><a href="#FNanchor_757_757"><span class="label">[757]</span></a> The name Shallum means "recompense." It may have been -regarded as ill-omened, since the King of Israel who bore this rare -name had only reigned a month.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_758_758" id="Footnote_758_758"></a><a href="#FNanchor_758_758"><span class="label">[758]</span></a> The Talmud says that kings were only anointed in special -cases (<i>Keritoth</i>, f. 5, 2; Grtz, ii. 328).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_759_759" id="Footnote_759_759"></a><a href="#FNanchor_759_759"><span class="label">[759]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, X. v. 2: Ἀσεβὴς καὶ μιαρὸς τὸν τρόπον.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_760_760" id="Footnote_760_760"></a><a href="#FNanchor_760_760"><span class="label">[760]</span></a> Herod., ii. 159.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_761_761" id="Footnote_761_761"></a><a href="#FNanchor_761_761"><span class="label">[761]</span></a> Mr. G. Smith identifies Carchemish with Jerabls.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_762_762" id="Footnote_762_762"></a><a href="#FNanchor_762_762"><span class="label">[762]</span></a> Cheyne, <i>Jeremiah</i>, p. 127.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_763_763" id="Footnote_763_763"></a><a href="#FNanchor_763_763"><span class="label">[763]</span></a> Comp. 2 Kings xxv. 20, 21. The old Hittite capital of Riblah -was a convenient halting-place on the road between Babylon and -Jerusalem. It was on the northernmost boundary of Palestine -towards Damascus (Amos vi. 14).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_764_764" id="Footnote_764_764"></a><a href="#FNanchor_764_764"><span class="label">[764]</span></a> Jer. xxii. 10-12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_765_765" id="Footnote_765_765"></a><a href="#FNanchor_765_765"><span class="label">[765]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxvi. 3; 1 Esdras i. 36. The smallness of the tribute -proves the impoverishment of the land. Sennacherib demanded from -Hezekiah three hundred talents of silver, and thirty of gold; and -Menahem paid one thousand talents of silver to Tiglath-Pileser.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_766_766" id="Footnote_766_766"></a><a href="#FNanchor_766_766"><span class="label">[766]</span></a> Not Jehoiakim, but Jehoiachin, as the sequel shows.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_767_767" id="Footnote_767_767"></a><a href="#FNanchor_767_767"><span class="label">[767]</span></a> Ezek. xix. 5-9. The allusions to Jehoiakim by Jeremiah are -numerous, and all unfavourable (xxii. 13-19, xxvi. 20-23, xxxvi. -20-31, etc.)</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_768_768" id="Footnote_768_768"></a><a href="#FNanchor_768_768"><span class="label">[768]</span></a> Josephus (<i>Antt.</i>, X. v. 2) is very severe on this king. He says -that "he was unjust in disposition, an evil-doer, neither pious towards -God nor just towards men."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_769_769" id="Footnote_769_769"></a><a href="#FNanchor_769_769"><span class="label">[769]</span></a> Perhaps an allusion to a sort of fortified palace on Ophel.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_770_770" id="Footnote_770_770"></a><a href="#FNanchor_770_770"><span class="label">[770]</span></a> Hab. ii. 9-11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_771_771" id="Footnote_771_771"></a><a href="#FNanchor_771_771"><span class="label">[771]</span></a> The text is perhaps corrupt. Two MSS. of the LXX. read -"because thou viest <i>with Ahab</i>," and the Vatican MSS. has "<i>with -Ahaz</i>." Cheyne adopts the former reading.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_772_772" id="Footnote_772_772"></a><a href="#FNanchor_772_772"><span class="label">[772]</span></a> Jer. xxii. 13-17.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_773_773" id="Footnote_773_773"></a><a href="#FNanchor_773_773"><span class="label">[773]</span></a> Jer. xxiii. 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_774_774" id="Footnote_774_774"></a><a href="#FNanchor_774_774"><span class="label">[774]</span></a> Jer. xxii. 23.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_775_775" id="Footnote_775_775"></a><a href="#FNanchor_775_775"><span class="label">[775]</span></a> Jer. xii. 5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_776_776" id="Footnote_776_776"></a><a href="#FNanchor_776_776"><span class="label">[776]</span></a> Jer. xxvi. 20-23. So far as I am aware, Bunsen stands alone in -identifying Urijah with the "Zechariah" who wrote Zech. xii.-xiv. -Others refer Zech. xii. 10 to the murder of Urijah.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_777_777" id="Footnote_777_777"></a><a href="#FNanchor_777_777"><span class="label">[777]</span></a> Jer. xxvi. 18.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_778_778" id="Footnote_778_778"></a><a href="#FNanchor_778_778"><span class="label">[778]</span></a> Isa. xiv., <i>passim</i>.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_779_779" id="Footnote_779_779"></a><a href="#FNanchor_779_779"><span class="label">[779]</span></a> Nabu-pal-ussur, "Nebo protect the son."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_780_780" id="Footnote_780_780"></a><a href="#FNanchor_780_780"><span class="label">[780]</span></a> Nabu-kudur-ussur, "Nebo protect the crown" (Schrader, ii. 48), -or "the youth" (Oppert). The portrait of Nebuchadrezzar—this is -the proper spelling, as generally in Jeremiah—is preserved for us on -a black cameo which he presented to the god Merodach. It is now -in the Berlin Museum, and shows strong but not cruel or ignoble -characteristics. It is copied in Riehm's <i>Handwrterbuch</i>, ii. 1067. -The Jews, as they were fond of doing to their enemies, made insulting -puns on his name. Thus in the <i>Vayyikra Rabba</i> (Wnsche, <i>Bibl. -Rabb.</i>) the Three Children are represented as saying to him, "You -are Neboo-cad-netser: bark [<i>nabach</i>] like a dog; swell like a water-jar -[<i>kad</i>], and chirp like a cricket [<i>tsertser</i>],"—in allusion to his madness.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_781_781" id="Footnote_781_781"></a><a href="#FNanchor_781_781"><span class="label">[781]</span></a> Jer. xlvi. 5 (vi. 25).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_782_782" id="Footnote_782_782"></a><a href="#FNanchor_782_782"><span class="label">[782]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, X. xi.; Berosus, p. 11. The Chronicler and Josephus -show some confusion, caused by the similarity of the names Jehoiakim -and Jehoiachin.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_783_783" id="Footnote_783_783"></a><a href="#FNanchor_783_783"><span class="label">[783]</span></a> Dan. i. 6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_784_784" id="Footnote_784_784"></a><a href="#FNanchor_784_784"><span class="label">[784]</span></a> We might infer from Ezek. xvii. 12 that Nebuchadrezzar actually -took Jehoiakim with him to Babylon.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_785_785" id="Footnote_785_785"></a><a href="#FNanchor_785_785"><span class="label">[785]</span></a> Ezek. xvii. 15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_786_786" id="Footnote_786_786"></a><a href="#FNanchor_786_786"><span class="label">[786]</span></a> Jer. xxxvi. 29, xxv. 9, xxvi. 6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_787_787" id="Footnote_787_787"></a><a href="#FNanchor_787_787"><span class="label">[787]</span></a> 2 Kings xxiv. 2-4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_788_788" id="Footnote_788_788"></a><a href="#FNanchor_788_788"><span class="label">[788]</span></a> Grtz thinks that Jeremiah's roll was substantially Jer. xxv.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_789_789" id="Footnote_789_789"></a><a href="#FNanchor_789_789"><span class="label">[789]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, IX. ix. 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_790_790" id="Footnote_790_790"></a><a href="#FNanchor_790_790"><span class="label">[790]</span></a> Jer. li. 59. Ewald, Hitzig, and others take the title to mean -"quartermaster" (2 Chron. xxxiv. 8).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_791_791" id="Footnote_791_791"></a><a href="#FNanchor_791_791"><span class="label">[791]</span></a> Jer. xlv. 1-5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_792_792" id="Footnote_792_792"></a><a href="#FNanchor_792_792"><span class="label">[792]</span></a> Zeph. i. 8; 1 Kings xxii. 26; Jer. xxxvi. 26, A.V., "The son of -Hammelech." Comp. xxxviii. 6. <i>Hammelech</i> may be a proper name, -or a prince of the blood-royal may be intended.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_793_793" id="Footnote_793_793"></a><a href="#FNanchor_793_793"><span class="label">[793]</span></a> "The 'Book,' now as afterwards, was to be the death-blow of the -old regal, aristocratic, sacerdotal exclusiveness. The 'Scribe,' now -first rising into importance in the person of Baruch to supply the -defects of the living Prophet, was, as the printing-press in later ages, -handing on the words of truth, which else might have irretrievably -perished" (Stanley).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_794_794" id="Footnote_794_794"></a><a href="#FNanchor_794_794"><span class="label">[794]</span></a> Cheyne, <i>Jeremiah</i>, p. 149; Jer. xiv. 1-xv. 9.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_795_795" id="Footnote_795_795"></a><a href="#FNanchor_795_795"><span class="label">[795]</span></a> Nebuchadrezzar occupies a larger space in the Bible than any -heathen king, being spoken of in 2 Kings, 2 Chronicles, Ezra, -Nehemiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_796_796" id="Footnote_796_796"></a><a href="#FNanchor_796_796"><span class="label">[796]</span></a> For further details of Jehoiakim see 1 Esdras i. 38: "He bound -Joakim and the nobles; <i>but Zaraces</i> his brother he apprehended, and -brought him out of Egypt." The allusion is entirely obscure, and -probably arises from some corruption of the text. The literal -rendering is: "And <i>Joakim</i> bound the nobles; but Zaraces his brother -he apprehended, and brought him out of Egypt." Zaraces might be -a corruption for Zedekiah, who was Jehoiakim's half-brother. Some -think that Zaraces is a corruption for Urijah, and "his brother" a -clerical error.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_797_797" id="Footnote_797_797"></a><a href="#FNanchor_797_797"><span class="label">[797]</span></a> Jer. xxxvi. 30, xxii. 19.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_798_798" id="Footnote_798_798"></a><a href="#FNanchor_798_798"><span class="label">[798]</span></a> LXX., καὶ ἐκοιμήθη Ἰωακεὶμ ἐν Γανοζὰν μετὰ τῶν πατέρων ἑαυτοῦ.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_799_799" id="Footnote_799_799"></a><a href="#FNanchor_799_799"><span class="label">[799]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxvi. 8.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_800_800" id="Footnote_800_800"></a><a href="#FNanchor_800_800"><span class="label">[800]</span></a> <i>Sanhedrin</i>, f. 104, 2. For another allusion see <i>id.</i> 49, 1; Hershon, -<i>Treasures of the Talmud</i>, p. 232.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_801_801" id="Footnote_801_801"></a><a href="#FNanchor_801_801"><span class="label">[801]</span></a> Jer. xxvi. 22.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_802_802" id="Footnote_802_802"></a><a href="#FNanchor_802_802"><span class="label">[802]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxvi. 9.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_803_803" id="Footnote_803_803"></a><a href="#FNanchor_803_803"><span class="label">[803]</span></a> Jer. xx. 2. There seem to have been special "stocks" and -"collars" in the Temple, reserved, by order of the priest Jehoiada, -for those whom the priests regarded as unruly prophets (Jer. -xxix. 26).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_804_804" id="Footnote_804_804"></a><a href="#FNanchor_804_804"><span class="label">[804]</span></a> Jer. xxii. 24-30. The captivity of the queen-mother struck -men's imaginations (Jer. xxix. 2).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_805_805" id="Footnote_805_805"></a><a href="#FNanchor_805_805"><span class="label">[805]</span></a> <i>Middoth</i>, ii. 6, quoted by Cheyne, p. 163; Jos., <i>B. J.</i>, VI. ii. 1. -Comp. Ezek. i. 2.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_806_806" id="Footnote_806_806"></a><a href="#FNanchor_806_806"><span class="label">[806]</span></a> Ezek. xix. 6-9. The special allusions are no longer certain.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_807_807" id="Footnote_807_807"></a><a href="#FNanchor_807_807"><span class="label">[807]</span></a> 2 Kings xx. 17. The expression "<i>he cut to pieces</i> all the vessels -of gold which Solomon had made" is hardly consistent with Ezra -i. 7-11, unless we understand the word in a loose sense.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_808_808" id="Footnote_808_808"></a><a href="#FNanchor_808_808"><span class="label">[808]</span></a> He says that he nobly gave himself up to save the city (<i>Antt.</i>, -X. vii. 1). His captivity was made an era from which to date Ezek. -i. 2, viii. 1, xxiv. 1, xxvi. 1, etc. Comp. Susannah 1-4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_809_809" id="Footnote_809_809"></a><a href="#FNanchor_809_809"><span class="label">[809]</span></a> Jer. xxii. 30, '<i>arr</i>. His "son" Assir (1 Chron. iii. 17) may have -been made an eunuch (Isa. xxxix. 7).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_810_810" id="Footnote_810_810"></a><a href="#FNanchor_810_810"><span class="label">[810]</span></a> Luke iii. 27, 31; Matt. i. 12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_811_811" id="Footnote_811_811"></a><a href="#FNanchor_811_811"><span class="label">[811]</span></a> Baruch i. 3, 4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_812_812" id="Footnote_812_812"></a><a href="#FNanchor_812_812"><span class="label">[812]</span></a> The favourable notice of Nebuchadrezzar in <i>Taanith</i> (quoted -above) is not found in <i>Berachoth</i>, f. 57, 2, where he is called "the -wicked." There are many wild legends about him. In <i>Nedarim</i> -(f. 65, 2), R. Yitzchak says: "May melted gold be poured into the -mouth of the wicked Nebuchadrezzar! Had not an angel struck him -on the mouth, he would have outshone all David's songs and praises." -With reference to Isa. xxii. 1, 2, the Rabbis say that Jeconiah went -to the Temple roof, and flung up the keys into the air, when Nebuchadrezzar -required them: "a hand took them, and they were seen -no more" (<i>Shekalim</i>, vi. 5). In <i>Nedarim</i> (f. 65, 2) we are told that -Zedekiah's rebellion consisted in divulging, contrary to his oath, -that he had seen Nebuchadrezzar eating a live hare (Hershon, -<i>Treasures of the Talmud</i>).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_813_813" id="Footnote_813_813"></a><a href="#FNanchor_813_813"><span class="label">[813]</span></a> Comp. Jer. xxiii. 6: Jehovah-Tsidkenu.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_814_814" id="Footnote_814_814"></a><a href="#FNanchor_814_814"><span class="label">[814]</span></a> Ezek. xvii. 12-14.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_815_815" id="Footnote_815_815"></a><a href="#FNanchor_815_815"><span class="label">[815]</span></a> Ezek. xvii. 1-6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_816_816" id="Footnote_816_816"></a><a href="#FNanchor_816_816"><span class="label">[816]</span></a> Jer. xxxiv. 8-11.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_817_817" id="Footnote_817_817"></a><a href="#FNanchor_817_817"><span class="label">[817]</span></a> Jer. xxxiv. 19. Comp. Gen. xv. 17.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_818_818" id="Footnote_818_818"></a><a href="#FNanchor_818_818"><span class="label">[818]</span></a> This is strikingly shown by his piteous remark to them in -Jer. xxxviii. 5.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_819_819" id="Footnote_819_819"></a><a href="#FNanchor_819_819"><span class="label">[819]</span></a> He first sent two of Jeremiah's friends, Elasah and Gemariah, -the son of Shaphan.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_820_820" id="Footnote_820_820"></a><a href="#FNanchor_820_820"><span class="label">[820]</span></a> Some critics have doubted the authenticity of Jer. li., lii.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_821_821" id="Footnote_821_821"></a><a href="#FNanchor_821_821"><span class="label">[821]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxvi. 14-21; Stanley, ii. 528; Milman, i. 394.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_822_822" id="Footnote_822_822"></a><a href="#FNanchor_822_822"><span class="label">[822]</span></a> Shaphan's other sons, Gemariah, Ahikam, Elasah, and his grandson -Gedaliah, were friends of Jeremiah.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_823_823" id="Footnote_823_823"></a><a href="#FNanchor_823_823"><span class="label">[823]</span></a> Ezek. viii. 17. The allusion seems to be to a custom like that -of the Parsees, who hold a branch of tamarisk or pomegranate twigs -(called <i>barsom</i>) before their mouths when they adore the sacred fire. -Strabo, xv. 732; Spiegel, <i>Zendavesta</i>, ii., p. lxviii; <i>Eran. Alterthumsk.</i>, iii. -571 (Orelli, <i>ad loc.</i>). Lightfoot explains it, "add fuel to their wrath."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_824_824" id="Footnote_824_824"></a><a href="#FNanchor_824_824"><span class="label">[824]</span></a> Ezek. xvi. 15-34.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_825_825" id="Footnote_825_825"></a><a href="#FNanchor_825_825"><span class="label">[825]</span></a> Jer. vii. 4, 21-28, viii. 8, xxiii. 31-33, xxxi. 33, 34.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_826_826" id="Footnote_826_826"></a><a href="#FNanchor_826_826"><span class="label">[826]</span></a> Jer. iii. 15, 16.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_827_827" id="Footnote_827_827"></a><a href="#FNanchor_827_827"><span class="label">[827]</span></a> Jer. xxvii. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_828_828" id="Footnote_828_828"></a><a href="#FNanchor_828_828"><span class="label">[828]</span></a> Herod., ii. 161.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_829_829" id="Footnote_829_829"></a><a href="#FNanchor_829_829"><span class="label">[829]</span></a> Psammis, the son of Necho, only reigned six years; Hophrah -(<span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 594) was his son.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_830_830" id="Footnote_830_830"></a><a href="#FNanchor_830_830"><span class="label">[830]</span></a> The LXX. calls him "the false prophet."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_831_831" id="Footnote_831_831"></a><a href="#FNanchor_831_831"><span class="label">[831]</span></a> Jer. xxvii. 1-8, 12-18. On vv. 16-22 see the LXX.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_832_832" id="Footnote_832_832"></a><a href="#FNanchor_832_832"><span class="label">[832]</span></a> Here (Jer. xxviii. 11, and in xxxiv. 1, xxxix. 5) the name is -written "Nebuchadnezzar"; everywhere else in Jeremiah it is -"Nebuchadrezzar."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_833_833" id="Footnote_833_833"></a><a href="#FNanchor_833_833"><span class="label">[833]</span></a> Part of his dispute with Jeremiah turned on the recovery or non-recovery -of the Temple vessels. Zedekiah is said to have given a set -of silver vessels to replace the old ones (Baruch i. 8).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_834_834" id="Footnote_834_834"></a><a href="#FNanchor_834_834"><span class="label">[834]</span></a> Jer. xxix. 21-23.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_835_835" id="Footnote_835_835"></a><a href="#FNanchor_835_835"><span class="label">[835]</span></a> Jer. xxiii. 9-32.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_836_836" id="Footnote_836_836"></a><a href="#FNanchor_836_836"><span class="label">[836]</span></a> Jer. xxviii. 13-16, xxiii. 28.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_837_837" id="Footnote_837_837"></a><a href="#FNanchor_837_837"><span class="label">[837]</span></a> Jer. xxiii. 29.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_838_838" id="Footnote_838_838"></a><a href="#FNanchor_838_838"><span class="label">[838]</span></a> Ezek. xiii. 1-23.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_839_839" id="Footnote_839_839"></a><a href="#FNanchor_839_839"><span class="label">[839]</span></a> Ezek. xvii. 25.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_840_840" id="Footnote_840_840"></a><a href="#FNanchor_840_840"><span class="label">[840]</span></a> Josephus rightly attributes the unfortunate career of Zedekiah to -the weakness with which he listened to evil counsellors, and to the -insolent multitude.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_841_841" id="Footnote_841_841"></a><a href="#FNanchor_841_841"><span class="label">[841]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxvi. 13; Jer. lii. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_842_842" id="Footnote_842_842"></a><a href="#FNanchor_842_842"><span class="label">[842]</span></a> Ezek. xvii. 15, 16, 18, 19.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_843_843" id="Footnote_843_843"></a><a href="#FNanchor_843_843"><span class="label">[843]</span></a> Ezek. xvii. 7-10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_844_844" id="Footnote_844_844"></a><a href="#FNanchor_844_844"><span class="label">[844]</span></a> Jer. xlvi. 17.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_845_845" id="Footnote_845_845"></a><a href="#FNanchor_845_845"><span class="label">[845]</span></a> Another form of belomancy is still commonly practised among -the Arabs. Three arrows are placed in a vessel: on one of them is -written, "My God permits me"; on another, "My God forbids me"; -the third is blank. They are then shaken, and the decision is guided -by the one which falls out first. Comp. Homer, <i>Iliad</i>, iii. 316; -<i>Speaker's Commentary</i>, <i>ad loc.</i></p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_846_846" id="Footnote_846_846"></a><a href="#FNanchor_846_846"><span class="label">[846]</span></a> Ezek. xxi. 28-32.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_847_847" id="Footnote_847_847"></a><a href="#FNanchor_847_847"><span class="label">[847]</span></a> An allusion to the restoration of Jeconiah or his descendants, and -to the far-off Messiah, meek and lowly.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_848_848" id="Footnote_848_848"></a><a href="#FNanchor_848_848"><span class="label">[848]</span></a> Ezek. iv. 1-3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_849_849" id="Footnote_849_849"></a><a href="#FNanchor_849_849"><span class="label">[849]</span></a> Jer. xxxvii. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_850_850" id="Footnote_850_850"></a><a href="#FNanchor_850_850"><span class="label">[850]</span></a> Ezek. vii. 16.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_851_851" id="Footnote_851_851"></a><a href="#FNanchor_851_851"><span class="label">[851]</span></a> Jer. xxi. 1-10, xxxvii. 1-17. Josephus says that Pharaoh was -defeated (<i>Antt.</i>, X. vii. 3). Jeremiah merely says that he and his army -returned to their own land.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_852_852" id="Footnote_852_852"></a><a href="#FNanchor_852_852"><span class="label">[852]</span></a> Homer, <i>Iliad</i>, i. 106-109.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_853_853" id="Footnote_853_853"></a><a href="#FNanchor_853_853"><span class="label">[853]</span></a> But it must not be forgotten that Jer. xxxi. 1-34 is so hopeful -that it has been called "the Gospel before Christ."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_854_854" id="Footnote_854_854"></a><a href="#FNanchor_854_854"><span class="label">[854]</span></a> Jer. vi. 14, viii. 11; Ezek. xiii. 10.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_855_855" id="Footnote_855_855"></a><a href="#FNanchor_855_855"><span class="label">[855]</span></a> W. R. Smith, "Prophets" (<i>Enc. Brit.</i>).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_856_856" id="Footnote_856_856"></a><a href="#FNanchor_856_856"><span class="label">[856]</span></a> Jer. xxxvii, 11-15.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_857_857" id="Footnote_857_857"></a><a href="#FNanchor_857_857"><span class="label">[857]</span></a> Jer xxxviii. 5. The Jewish aristocracy consisted, says Grtz, -of three classes: the <i>ben hammelech</i>, or "king's sons"—<i>i.e.</i>, princes -of the blood-royal; the <i>rosh aboth</i>, "heads of the fathers," or -<i>zekenm</i>, "elders"; and the <i>abhod hammelech</i>, "king's servants," or -"courtiers" (ii. 446).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_858_858" id="Footnote_858_858"></a><a href="#FNanchor_858_858"><span class="label">[858]</span></a> Lam. v. 4.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_859_859" id="Footnote_859_859"></a><a href="#FNanchor_859_859"><span class="label">[859]</span></a> Jer. xxxvii. 21, xxxviii. 9, lii. 6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_860_860" id="Footnote_860_860"></a><a href="#FNanchor_860_860"><span class="label">[860]</span></a> Lam. iv. 7, 8.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_861_861" id="Footnote_861_861"></a><a href="#FNanchor_861_861"><span class="label">[861]</span></a> Lam. iv. 10, ii. 20; Ezek. v. 10; Baruch ii. 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_862_862" id="Footnote_862_862"></a><a href="#FNanchor_862_862"><span class="label">[862]</span></a> Lam. iv. 5. See Stanley, <i>Lectures</i>, ii. 470.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_863_863" id="Footnote_863_863"></a><a href="#FNanchor_863_863"><span class="label">[863]</span></a> Ezek. xi. 22.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_864_864" id="Footnote_864_864"></a><a href="#FNanchor_864_864"><span class="label">[864]</span></a> This may possibly be alluded to in Psalm lxix. 2.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_865_865" id="Footnote_865_865"></a><a href="#FNanchor_865_865"><span class="label">[865]</span></a> Jer. xxxviii. 10, A.V., "thirty."</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_866_866" id="Footnote_866_866"></a><a href="#FNanchor_866_866"><span class="label">[866]</span></a> Van Oort, iv. 52.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_867_867" id="Footnote_867_867"></a><a href="#FNanchor_867_867"><span class="label">[867]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, X. viii. 2; 2 Chron. xxxii. 5, xxxiii. 14. First and -last, the siege seems to have lasted one year, five months, and twenty-seven -days.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_868_868" id="Footnote_868_868"></a><a href="#FNanchor_868_868"><span class="label">[868]</span></a> Zech. viii. 19.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_869_869" id="Footnote_869_869"></a><a href="#FNanchor_869_869"><span class="label">[869]</span></a> The inscriptions of Nebuchadrezzar which have been as yet -deciphered speak of his sumptuous buildings and of his worship of -the gods rather than of his conquests. See <i>Records of the Past</i>, -vii. 69-78.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_870_870" id="Footnote_870_870"></a><a href="#FNanchor_870_870"><span class="label">[870]</span></a> Robinson, <i>Bibl. Res.</i>, ii. 536. Some suppose that "the king's -garden" was near the mouth of the Tyropœon Valley.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_871_871" id="Footnote_871_871"></a><a href="#FNanchor_871_871"><span class="label">[871]</span></a> Ezek. xii. 12. Perhaps the gate alluded to is the fountain gate of -Neh. iii. 15. Ezekiel seems to speak of "digging through the wall." -Robinson says that a trace of the outermost wall still exists in the -rude pathway which crosses the mouth of the Tyropœon on a mound -hard by the old mulberry tree which marks the traditional site of -Isaiah's martyrdom.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_872_872" id="Footnote_872_872"></a><a href="#FNanchor_872_872"><span class="label">[872]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, X. viii. 2.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_873_873" id="Footnote_873_873"></a><a href="#FNanchor_873_873"><span class="label">[873]</span></a> Traces of his presence are found in inscriptions in the Wady of -the Dog near Beyrout, and in Wady Brissa. See Sayce, <i>Proceedings -of the Bibl. Arch. Soc.</i>, November 1881.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_874_874" id="Footnote_874_874"></a><a href="#FNanchor_874_874"><span class="label">[874]</span></a> 2 Kings xxv. 7. See Layard, <i>Nineveh</i>, ii. 376.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_875_875" id="Footnote_875_875"></a><a href="#FNanchor_875_875"><span class="label">[875]</span></a> The blinding was sometimes done by passing a red-hot rod of -silver or brass over the open eyes; sometimes by plucking out the -eyes (Jer. lii. 11, Vulg. <i>oculos eruit</i>; 2 Kings xxv. 7, <i>effodit</i>). See a -hideous illustration of a yet more brutal process in Botta (<i>Monum. de -Ninve</i>, Pl. cxviii.), where Sargon with his own hand is thrusting -a lance into the eyes of a captive prince, whose head is kept steady by -a bridle fastened to a hook through his lips. See also Judg. xvi. 21; -Xen., <i>Anab.</i>, i. 9, 13; Procopius, <i>Bel. Pers.</i>, i. 1; Ammianus, xxvii. -12; Rawlinson, <i>Ancient Monarchies</i>, i. 307.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_876_876" id="Footnote_876_876"></a><a href="#FNanchor_876_876"><span class="label">[876]</span></a> Jos., <i>Antt.</i>, X. viii. 2, 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_877_877" id="Footnote_877_877"></a><a href="#FNanchor_877_877"><span class="label">[877]</span></a> Nebur-zir-iddina, "Nebo bestowed seed." Jer. xxxix. 9, 13, is in -some way corrupt. Ezekiel (ix. 2), however, and Josephus (<i>Antt.</i>, X. -viii. 2) mention <i>six</i> officers. Nebuzaradan was "chief of the executioners" -(Gen. xxxvii. 36; 1 Kings ii. 25, 35, 46).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_878_878" id="Footnote_878_878"></a><a href="#FNanchor_878_878"><span class="label">[878]</span></a> Psalm lxxix. 2, 3.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_879_879" id="Footnote_879_879"></a><a href="#FNanchor_879_879"><span class="label">[879]</span></a> 2 Chron. xxxvi. 17; Lam. ii. 21, v. 11, 12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_880_880" id="Footnote_880_880"></a><a href="#FNanchor_880_880"><span class="label">[880]</span></a> To the reminiscences of these scenes are partly due the Talmudic -legend about the blood of Zechariah, the son of Jehoiada, bubbling up -to demand vengeance. Nebudchadrezzar slew a holocaust of human -victims to appease the shade of the wrathful prophet, until the king -himself was terrified, and asked if he wished his whole people to be -slaughtered. Then the blood ceased to bubble.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_881_881" id="Footnote_881_881"></a><a href="#FNanchor_881_881"><span class="label">[881]</span></a> See Rawlinson, <i>Kings of Israel and Judah</i>, p. 236.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_882_882" id="Footnote_882_882"></a><a href="#FNanchor_882_882"><span class="label">[882]</span></a> Lam. iv. 22.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_883_883" id="Footnote_883_883"></a><a href="#FNanchor_883_883"><span class="label">[883]</span></a> Psalm lxxix, 1.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_884_884" id="Footnote_884_884"></a><a href="#FNanchor_884_884"><span class="label">[884]</span></a> Obad. 14-16; Psalm cxxxvii. 7; 1 Esdras iv. 45.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_885_885" id="Footnote_885_885"></a><a href="#FNanchor_885_885"><span class="label">[885]</span></a> Comp. Esther i. 14.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_886_886" id="Footnote_886_886"></a><a href="#FNanchor_886_886"><span class="label">[886]</span></a> On these personages see 1 Chron. vi. 13, 14; 2 Kings xxii. 4; -Ezra vii. 1; Jer. xxi. 1, xxxvii. 3, etc.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_887_887" id="Footnote_887_887"></a><a href="#FNanchor_887_887"><span class="label">[887]</span></a> Nebuchadrezzar had no doubt needed them for his great buildings -at Babylon, and their deportation would render more difficult any -attempt to refortify Jerusalem.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_888_888" id="Footnote_888_888"></a><a href="#FNanchor_888_888"><span class="label">[888]</span></a> Jer. xli. 8, xl. 12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_889_889" id="Footnote_889_889"></a><a href="#FNanchor_889_889"><span class="label">[889]</span></a> Jer. lii. 28-30. In his seventh year, 3,023; in his eighteenth, 832 -in his thirty-third, 745 = 4,600.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_890_890" id="Footnote_890_890"></a><a href="#FNanchor_890_890"><span class="label">[890]</span></a> Ramah was but five miles from Jerusalem, and at first Jeremiah -may not have been identified (Jer. xl. 1-6).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_891_891" id="Footnote_891_891"></a><a href="#FNanchor_891_891"><span class="label">[891]</span></a> The present, if accepted, could only be regarded, under the circumstances, -as part of the necessity of life. It does not fall under -the head of the presents often offered to prophets (1 Sam. ix. 7; -2 Kings iv. 42; Mic. iii. 5, 11; Amos vii. 12).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_892_892" id="Footnote_892_892"></a><a href="#FNanchor_892_892"><span class="label">[892]</span></a> Jer. xi. 19-21, xii. 6.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_893_893" id="Footnote_893_893"></a><a href="#FNanchor_893_893"><span class="label">[893]</span></a> Stanley, <i>Lectures</i>, ii. 515.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_894_894" id="Footnote_894_894"></a><a href="#FNanchor_894_894"><span class="label">[894]</span></a> So Grtz and Cheyne.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_895_895" id="Footnote_895_895"></a><a href="#FNanchor_895_895"><span class="label">[895]</span></a> Jer. xxxi. 15-17.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_896_896" id="Footnote_896_896"></a><a href="#FNanchor_896_896"><span class="label">[896]</span></a> Jer. xxvi. 24.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_897_897" id="Footnote_897_897"></a><a href="#FNanchor_897_897"><span class="label">[897]</span></a> Jer. xl. 12.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_898_898" id="Footnote_898_898"></a><a href="#FNanchor_898_898"><span class="label">[898]</span></a> Some identify it with <i>Shaphat</i>, a mile from Jerusalem.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_899_899" id="Footnote_899_899"></a><a href="#FNanchor_899_899"><span class="label">[899]</span></a> They are called <i>sar</i> ("princes").</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_900_900" id="Footnote_900_900"></a><a href="#FNanchor_900_900"><span class="label">[900]</span></a> There is no Elishama in the royal genealogy, except a son of -David. Ishmael may have been the son or grandson of some -Ammonite princess. An Elishama was scribe of Jehoiakim (Jer. -xxxvi. 12).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_901_901" id="Footnote_901_901"></a><a href="#FNanchor_901_901"><span class="label">[901]</span></a> The Hebrew text calls these ten ruffians <i>rabb hammelech</i>, "chief -officers of the king" of Ammon.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_902_902" id="Footnote_902_902"></a><a href="#FNanchor_902_902"><span class="label">[902]</span></a> Josephus records or conjectures that the governor was overpowered -by wine, and had sunk into slumber (<i>Antt.</i>, X. ix. 2).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_903_903" id="Footnote_903_903"></a><a href="#FNanchor_903_903"><span class="label">[903]</span></a> In Jer. xli. 9, for "because of Gedaliah," the better reading is -"was a great pit" (LXX., φρέαρ μέγα).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_904_904" id="Footnote_904_904"></a><a href="#FNanchor_904_904"><span class="label">[904]</span></a> Ishmael—a marvel of craft and villainy—put into practice the -same stratagem which on a larger scale was employed by Mohammed -Ali in his massacre of the Mamelukes at Cairo in 1806 (Grove, <i>s.v.</i> -<i>Bibl. Dict.</i>). For "the midst of the city" (Jer. xli. 7), we ought to -read "courtyard," as in Josephus.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_905_905" id="Footnote_905_905"></a><a href="#FNanchor_905_905"><span class="label">[905]</span></a> Comp. Jehu's treatment of the family of Ahaziah (2 Kings x. 14).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_906_906" id="Footnote_906_906"></a><a href="#FNanchor_906_906"><span class="label">[906]</span></a> The dark deed is still commemorated by a Jewish fast, as in the -days of Zechariah (Zech. vii. 3-5, viii. 19).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_907_907" id="Footnote_907_907"></a><a href="#FNanchor_907_907"><span class="label">[907]</span></a> Isa. xix. 18-22.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_908_908" id="Footnote_908_908"></a><a href="#FNanchor_908_908"><span class="label">[908]</span></a> Jer. ii. 16, xliv. 1; Ezek. xxx. 18; Jer. xliii. 7, xlvi. 14; Herod., ii. 30.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_909_909" id="Footnote_909_909"></a><a href="#FNanchor_909_909"><span class="label">[909]</span></a> Fl. Petrie, <i>Memoir on Tanis</i> (Egypt. Explor. Fund, 4th memoir), -1888.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_910_910" id="Footnote_910_910"></a><a href="#FNanchor_910_910"><span class="label">[910]</span></a> Jer. xliii. 13, Beth-shemesh. Only one pillar of the Temple of -the Sun is now standing. It is said to be four thousand years old. -It is certain that Nebuchadrezzar invaded Egypt and defeated Amasis, -the son of Hophrah, <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 565, reducing Egypt to "the basest of -kingdoms" (Ezek. xxix. 14, 15). Three of Nebuchadrezzar's terra-cotta -cylinders have been found at Tahpanhes.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_911_911" id="Footnote_911_911"></a><a href="#FNanchor_911_911"><span class="label">[911]</span></a> How far the prophecy was fulfilled we do not know. Assyrian -and Egyptian fragments of record show that in the thirty-seventh year -of his reign Nebuchadrezzar invaded Egypt and advanced to Syene -(Ezek. xxix. 10).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_912_912" id="Footnote_912_912"></a><a href="#FNanchor_912_912"><span class="label">[912]</span></a> 2 Macc. ii. 1-8; comp. xv. 13-16. The tradition is singular when -we recall the small store which Jeremiah set by the Ark (Jer. iii. 16).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_913_913" id="Footnote_913_913"></a><a href="#FNanchor_913_913"><span class="label">[913]</span></a> Evil-Merodach (Avil-Marduk, "Man of Merodach") only reigned -two years, and was then murdered by his brother-in-law Neriglissar -(Berosus <i>ap.</i> Jos.: comp. <i>Ap.</i>, i. 20). The Rabbis have a story—perhaps -founded on that of Gaius and Agrippa I.—that Evil-Merodach had been -imprisoned by his father for wishing his death, and in prison formed -a friendship for Jehoiachin.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_914_914" id="Footnote_914_914"></a><a href="#FNanchor_914_914"><span class="label">[914]</span></a> "Lifted up his head." Comp. Gen. xl. 13, 20.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_915_915" id="Footnote_915_915"></a><a href="#FNanchor_915_915"><span class="label">[915]</span></a> To be thus ὁμοτράπεζος, or σύσσιτος, of the king was a high honour -(Herod., iii. 13, v. 24. Comp. Judg. i. 7; 2 Sam. ix. 13, etc.).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_916_916" id="Footnote_916_916"></a><a href="#FNanchor_916_916"><span class="label">[916]</span></a> T. Hodgkin, <i>Friends' Quarterly</i>, September 1893, p. 401.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_917_917" id="Footnote_917_917"></a><a href="#FNanchor_917_917"><span class="label">[917]</span></a> Jer. xxix. 25-27.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_918_918" id="Footnote_918_918"></a><a href="#FNanchor_918_918"><span class="label">[918]</span></a> Up to the time of Tiglath-Pileser II., the Eponym Year (which -is not here given) marks the second complete year of each king's -reign.</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_919_919" id="Footnote_919_919"></a><a href="#FNanchor_919_919"><span class="label">[919]</span></a> This Shalmaneser died about <span class="smcap">b.c.</span> 825, after a reign of thirty-five -years (Sayce in <i>Records of the Past</i>, v. 27-42; Oppert, <i>Hist. des Empires -de Chalde et d'Assyrie</i>; Mnant, <i>Annales des Rois d'Assyrie</i>, 1874).</p> - - - -<p><a name="Footnote_920_920" id="Footnote_920_920"></a><a href="#FNanchor_920_920"><span class="label">[920]</span></a> Many of these dates can only be regarded as uncertain and -approximate. Kamphausen dates the commencement of all the latter -kings a year later (<i>Die Chronologie der hebrischen Knige</i>, Bonn, 1883).</p> -</div> - - -<div class="tn"> - -<h2><a name="Transcribers_Notes" id="Transcribers_Notes">Transcriber's Notes:</a></h2> - -<ul class="corrections"> - -<li>Obvious punctuation and spelling errors have been fixed throughout.</li> - -<li>Inconsistent hyphenation left as in the original text.</li> - -<li>Missing footnote anchors have been placed, when possible to determine placement.</li> - -<li>Footnote 198: Greek has been corrected to add accents.</li> - -<li>Footnote 215: Greek has been corrected.</li> - -</ul></div> - - - - - - - - -<pre> - - - - - -End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Expositor's Bible, by F. W. Farrar - -*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE *** - -***** This file should be named 42027-h.htm or 42027-h.zip ***** -This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: - http://www.gutenberg.org/4/2/0/2/42027/ - -Produced by Douglas L. Alley, III, Colin Bell and the -Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net -(This file was produced from images generously made -available by The Internet Archive) - - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions -will be renamed. - -Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no -one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation -(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without -permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, -set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to -copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to -protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project -Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you -charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you -do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the -rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose -such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and -research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do -practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is -subject to the trademark license, especially commercial -redistribution. - - - -*** START: FULL LICENSE *** - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project -Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at - www.gutenberg.org/license. - - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy -all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. -If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the -terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or -entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement -and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" -or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the -collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an -individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are -located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from -copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative -works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg -are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project -Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by -freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of -this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with -the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by -keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project -Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in -a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check -the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement -before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or -creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project -Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning -the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United -States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate -access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently -whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, -copied or distributed: - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived -from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is -posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied -and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees -or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work -with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the -work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 -through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the -Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or -1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional -terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked -to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the -permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any -word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or -distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than -"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version -posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), -you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a -copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon -request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other -form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided -that - -- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is - owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he - has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the - Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments - must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you - prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax - returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and - sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the - address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to - the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." - -- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or - destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium - and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of - Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any - money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days - of receipt of the work. - -- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set -forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from -both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael -Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the -Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm -collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain -"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or -corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual -property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a -computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by -your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with -your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with -the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a -refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity -providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to -receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy -is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further -opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER -WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO -WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. -If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the -law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be -interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by -the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any -provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance -with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, -promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, -harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, -that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do -or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm -work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any -Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. - - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers -including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists -because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from -people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. -To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 -and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org - - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive -Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent -permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. -Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered -throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 -North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email -contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the -Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -For additional contact information: - Dr. Gregory B. Newby - Chief Executive and Director - gbnewby@pglaf.org - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To -SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any -particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. -To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm -concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared -with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project -Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. -unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily -keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. - -Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: - - www.gutenberg.org - -This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. - - -</pre> - -</body> -</html> diff --git a/old/42027-h/images/001.png b/old/42027-h/images/001.png Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 72dbe9f..0000000 --- a/old/42027-h/images/001.png +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/42027.txt b/old/42027.txt deleted file mode 100644 index 0041269..0000000 --- a/old/42027.txt +++ /dev/null @@ -1,16905 +0,0 @@ -The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Expositor's Bible, by F. W. Farrar - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - - -Title: The Expositor's Bible - The Second Book of Kings - -Author: F. W. Farrar - -Editor: W. Robertson Nicoll - -Release Date: February 5, 2013 [EBook #42027] - -Language: English - -Character set encoding: ASCII - -*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE *** - - - - -Produced by Douglas L. Alley, III, Colin Bell and the -Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net -(This file was produced from images generously made -available by The Internet Archive) - - - - - - - - - - The - - Expositor's Bible - - - Edited by - W. Robertson Nicoll, D.D., LL.D. - - - - - - - - - -[Illustration] - - - - - THE EXPOSITORS' BIBLE - - _Edited by_ W. ROBERTSON NICOLL, D.D., LL.D. - - _New and Cheaper Edition. Printed from original plates - Complete in every detail. Uniform with this volume_ - - Price 50 cents per volume. (If by mail add 10 cents postage) - - - OLD TESTAMENT VOLUMES - - GENESIS. By Rev. Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D. - - EXODUS. By Very Rev. G. A. Chadwick, D.D., Dean of Armagh. - - LEVITICUS. By Rev. S. H. Kellogg, D.D. - - NUMBERS. By Rev. R. A. Watson, D.D. - - DEUTERONOMY. By Rev. Prof. Andrew Harper, B.D. - - JOSHUA. By Rev. Prof. W. G. Blaikie, D.D., LL.D. - - JUDGES AND RUTH. By Rev. R. A. Watson, D.D. - - FIRST SAMUEL. By Rev. Prof. W. G. Blaikie, D.D., LL.D. - - SECOND SAMUEL. By same author. - - FIRST KINGS. By F. W. Farrar, D.D., Dean of Canterbury. - - SECOND KINGS. By same author. - - FIRST AND SECOND CHRONICLES. By Rev. Prof. W. H. Bennett. - - EZRA, NEHEMIAH, AND ESTHER. By Rev. Prof. W. F. Adeney. - - JOB. By Rev. R. A. Watson, D.D. - - PSALMS. In 3 vols. Vol. I., Chapters I.-XXXVIII.; Vol. II., Chapters - XXXIX.-LXXXIX.; Vol. III., Chapters XC.-CL. By Rev. - Alexander Maclaren, D.D. - - PROVERBS. By Rev. R. F. Horton, D.D. - - ECCLESIASTES. By Rev. Samuel Cox, D.D. - - SONG OF SOLOMON and LAMENTATIONS. By Rev. Prof. W. F. Adeney. - - ISAIAH. In 2 vols. Vol. I., Chapters I.-XXXIX.; Vol. II., Chapters - XL.-LXVI. By Prof. George Adam Smith, D.D., LL.D. - - JEREMIAH. Chapters I.-XX. With a Sketch of his Life and Times. By - Rev. C. J. Ball. - - JEREMIAH. Chapters XXI.-LII. By Rev. Prof. W. H. Bennett. - - EZEKIEL. By Rev. Prof. John Skinner. - - DANIEL. By F. W. FARRAR, D.D., Dean of Canterbury. - - THE TWELVE (Minor) PROPHETS. In 2 vols. By Rev. George Adam Smith, - D.D., LL.D. - - - NEW TESTAMENT VOLUMES - - ST. MATTHEW. By Rev. J. Monro Gibson, D.D. - - ST. MARK. By Very Rev. G. A. Chadwick, D.D., Dean of Armagh. - - ST. LUKE. By Rev. Henry Burton. - - GOSPEL OF ST. JOHN. In 2 vols. Vol. I., Chapters I.-XI.; Vol. II., - Chapters XII.-XXI. By Rev. Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D. - - THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. In 2 vols. By Rev. Prof. G. T. Stokes, D.D. - - ROMANS. By Rev. Handley C. G. Moule, D.D. - - FIRST CORINTHIANS. By Rev. Prof. Marcus Dods, D.D. - - SECOND CORINTHIANS. By Rev. James Denney, D.D. - - GALATIANS. By Rev. Prof. G. G. Findlay, D.D. - - EPHESIANS. By same author. - - PHILIPPIANS. By Rev. Principal Robert Rainy, D.D. - - COLOSSIANS and PHILEMON. By Rev. Alexander Maclaren, D.D. - - THESSALONIANS. By Rev. James Denney, D.D. - - PASTORAL EPISTLES. By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D. - - HEBREWS. By Rev. Principal T. C. Edwards, D.D. - - ST. JAMES and ST. JUDE. By Rev. A. Plummer, D.D. - - ST. PETER. By Rev. Prof. J. Rawson Lumby, D.D. - - EPISTLES OF ST. JOHN. By Rt. Rev. W. Alexander, Lord Bishop of Derry. - - REVELATION. By Prof. W. Milligan, D.D. - - INDEX VOLUME TO ENTIRE SERIES. - - _New York_: HODDER & STOUGHTON, _Publishers_ - - - - - THE - SECOND BOOK OF KINGS - - - - - - BY - F. W. Farrar, D.D., F.R.S. - - LATE FELLOW OF TRINITY COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE; ARCHDEACON OF - WESTMINSTER - - - - - - - - HODDER & STOUGHTON - NEW YORK - GEORGE H. DORAN COMPANY - - - - - CONTENTS - - - - CHAPTER I - - PAGE - - AHAZIAH BEN-AHAB OF ISRAEL (B.C. 855-854) 3 - - A weak, shadowy, and faithless king--1. Relations between Judah and - Israel--2. Alliance with Jehoshaphat--3. Revolt of Moab--Mesha and - the Moabite Stone--4. The fall from the lattice--Baal-Zebub--Elijah - calling down fire from heaven--How are we to judge respecting the - Elijah-spirit?--Variations of moral standard. - - CHAPTER II - - THE ASCENSION OF ELIJAH 19 - - Uncertain date--The journey to Gilgal; to Bethel; to Jericho; to - the Jordan--The double portion--Chariot and horses of fire--Elisha - recrosses the Jordan--The young prophets and their - search--Grandeur of Elijah. - - CHAPTER III - - ELISHA 25 - - Cycle of supernatural stories--Elisha and Elijah--The cure of the - unwholesome fountain--"Go up, thou bald-head"--The children and - the bears. - - CHAPTER IV - - THE INVASION OF MOAB 29 - - Death of Ahaziah--Jehoram Ben-Ahab of Israel--Good - beginnings--Attempts to recover Moab--Alliance with Judah and - Edom--The invasion--An army perishing of - thirst--Elisha--Music--Trenches in the wady--Error of the - Moabites--Their disastrous rout--Devastation of the - country--Mesha propitiates Chemosh--"Great wrath against - Israel"--The invading army retreats. - - CHAPTER V - - ELISHA'S MIRACLES 40 - - Their chronological vagueness--Difference between Elisha and - Elijah--Contrasts and resemblances--Social life in Israel--1. The - widow and the oil--2. The lady of Shunem--Her hospitality--Her - reward--3. The boy's death--Her distress--The resuscitation--4. - Death in the pot--5. The multiplied first-fruits. - - CHAPTER VI - - THE STORY OF NAAMAN 50 - - The little maid--The leper--Letter of Benhadad to Jehoram--His - indignation--Elisha's message--Naaman's disappointment and - anger--His servants--His healing--His gratitude--Bowing in the house - of Rimmon--Mean cupidity of Gehazi--Stricken with leprosy--The - axe-head. - - CHAPTER VII - - ELISHA AND THE SYRIANS 66 - - Syrian marauders--They are baffled--Anger of Benhadad--The vision - at Dothan--Meaning of the promises--How fulfilled to God's saints - on earth--Some are delivered, some are not--Elisha misleads the - Syrians--His generosity to them--Its effects--A fresh Syrian - invasion. - - CHAPTER VIII - - THE FAMINE AND THE SIEGE 76 - - Horrible straits of the besieged Samaritans--Stress of famine--The - King of Israel--The miserable women--Sackcloth under the - purple--The king's fury and despair--He threatens Elisha--The - messenger--The king upbraids him--Prophecy of sudden plenty--The - disbelieving lord--The extramural lepers--The Syrian camp--The - king's misgivings--The lord killed in the rush of the people. - - CHAPTER IX - - THE SHUNAMMITE AND HAZAEL 87 - - The lady of Shunem leaves her estate--Her return--Gehazi talks with - the king--Entrance of the Shunammite--Her estates restored--Elisha - visits Damascus--A royal present--Benhadad's illness--Hazael--The - dark prophecy--Unexplained death of Benhadad--Hazael's - usurpation--Real meaning of Elisha's words to Hazael. - - CHAPTER X - - TWO SONS OF JEHOSHAPHAT 99 - - Jehoram (B.C. 851-843)--Ahaziah (B.C. 843-842)--Jehoram - ben-Jehoshaphat of Judah--Perplexing uncertainty of minute - chronological details--The blight of the Jezebel-alliance--The - husband of Athaliah--His apostasies--Revolt of Edom--Narrow escape - of Jehoram--Revolt of Libnah--Jehoram's murder by his - brethren--Philistine invasion--Incurable disease--Ahaziah - ben-Jehoram--Joins his uncle (Jehoram ben-Ahab) in the campaign - against Ramoth-Gilead--Visits him at Jezreel--Shot down by Jehu. - - CHAPTER XI - - THE REVOLT OF JEHU (B.C. 842) 106 - - Misery of Jehoram's reign--Thwarted invasion of Moab--Aggression - of Benhadad--At Ramoth-Gilead--The young prophet--The two kings - absent from the camp--The dangerous commission--The assembled - captains--Jehu secretly anointed--His accession enthusiastically - welcomed by the army--His sudden enthronement--His swift - resolution--The watchman at Jezreel--The two horsemen--The two - kings--Their murder--Ferocity of Jehu--Elijah's - prophecy--Jezebel--She is hurled down--Jehu drives over her - body--The curse fulfilled. - - CHAPTER XII - - JEHU ESTABLISHED ON THE THRONE (B.C. 842-814) 125 - - His politic subtlety--The murder of the seventy princes--The - ghastly heaps--Hypocritic ferocity. - - CHAPTER XIII - - FRESH MURDERS--THE EXTIRPATION OF BAAL-WORSHIP (B.C. 842) 131 - - Wading through blood to a throne--The ride to Samaria--The brethren - of Ahaziah of Judah--The corpse-choked tank of the shepherds--The - Bedawy ascetic--The scene of slaughter in the temple of Baal--Did - Elisha approve of these atrocities?--Prophetic judgment on - Jehu--Ravages of Hazael--Jehu's anguish--He pays tribute to Assyria. - - CHAPTER XIV - - ATHALIAH (B.C. 842-836)--JOASH OF JUDAH (B.C. 836-796) 146 - - The murderess-daughter of Jezebel--Fierce ambition--Jehosheba--The - rescued child--Reared in the Temple--The high priest's plot--The - coronation of the boy-king--Athaliah enters the Temple--Her - murder--The fate of Baal's high priest--Proposed restoration of - the Temple--Joash calls to task the defaulting priests--Death of - Jehoiada--Defection of Joash--Murder of Zechariah--Bad record of - the line of Jewish priests--Hazael attacks Judah--Defeat of Joash - and plunder of Jerusalem--Murder of Joash--Names of the murderers. - - CHAPTER XV - - AMAZIAH OF JUDAH (B.C. 796-783[?]) 167 - - The House of David--Amaziah brings to justice the murderers of his - father, but spares their children--Grounds for this--Different - views taken of him by the historian and the chronicler--Splendid - victory of Amaziah in the Valley of Salt--Expansion of the story - in the Chronicles--His defiance of Joash--His defeat and murder. - - CHAPTER XVI - - THE DYNASTY OF JEHU--JEHOAHAZ (B.C. 814-797)--JOASH - (B.C. 797-781) 175 - - Israel at its nadir--Calf-worship--Oppression of - Hazael--Disappearance of Elisha--Repentance of Jehoahaz--Joash of - Israel visits the death-bed of Elisha--"The arrow of the Lord's - deliverance"--Three victories over the Syrians--Death of Elisha, - and posthumous marvels--Joash and Amaziah--Contemptuous answer to - the King of Judah--Crushing defeat of Judah. - - CHAPTER XVII - - THE DYNASTY OF JEHU (CONTINUED)--JEROBOAM II. (B.C. 781-740) 187 - - Jeroboam II. the greatest of the kings of Israel--His conquests - and wide dominion--A dying gleam of prosperity--Cause of his - success--Relations with Assyria--Dawn of written prophecy--Jonah. - - CHAPTER XVIII - - AMOS AND HOSEA--ZACHARIAH BEN-JEROBOAM (B.C. 740) 193 - - Amos describes the condition of Israel--Growth of usury and - vice--Humble origin of Amos--His burdens--Degenerations of the - "calf-worship"--Uncompromising denunciation--Collision of Amos - with Amaziah the high priest at Bethel--His expulsion from - Bethel--The curse denounced--His justification of his - mission--Hosea the saddest of the prophets--His pictures of - Ephraim--Jeroboam II.--His death--His son Zachariah--His - desertion and shameful end. - - CHAPTER XIX - - UZZIAH OF JUDAH (B.C. 783[?]-737)--JOTHAM (B.C. 737-735) 209 - - Wane of Assyria--Uzziah a wise and good king--His other name - Azariah--Expansion of the story of his conquests in the - Chronicles--Training of his army--Defeated by the Assyrians - (?)--Stricken with leprosy--The story--Jotham acts as his public - representative--Diminished power of Judah under Jotham--Beginning - of Isaiah's prophecies--Death of Jotham. - - CHAPTER XX - - THE AGONY OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM--SHALLUM, MENAHEM, PEKAHIAH, - PEKAH (B.C. 740-734) 217 - - Shallum, an usurping murderer--Rapid disappearance of - kings--Distracted epoch--The prophet Zechariah and the three - shepherds--Zechariah's prophecies--The cruel shepherd, - Menahem--His savage deeds--Portentous appearance of the Assyrians - in Israel--Menahem pays tribute--Tiglath-Pileser--Fulfilment of - Hosea's prophecy--Pekahiah--His murder--Pekah--His alliance with - Rezin against Judah--Ahaz appeals to Assyria--Defeat and death of - Rezin--Fulfilment of prophecy of Amos--Beginning of the captivity - of the Ten Tribes--Tiglath-Pileser's successors--Murder of Pekah - by Hoshea--Horrible state of Israel as described by Isaiah. - - CHAPTER XXI - - KING HOSHEA AND THE FALL OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM (B.C. - 734-725) 235 - - The name Hoshea--The king and the prophet--Occasional gleams of hope - and promise--A humiliating reign--Death of Tiglath-Pileser--Hoshea - revolts to Sabaco of Egypt--Seized by Shalmaneser--Samaria - besieged--Terrible state of the city--Sabaco renders no - help--Usurpation of Sargon--Capture of the city--Greatness of - Sargon--Fall of the Northern Kingdom--Blighted destiny--God's - mercy--"God, and not man"--Despoliation of the tribes--Moral of the - story--Assyria and Egypt--The strength and weakness of a - nation--Machiavelli--Mixture of alien emigrants--Their worship--The - lions--Strange syncretism--The Jews and the Samaritans. - - CHAPTER XXII - - THE REIGN OF AHAZ (B.C. 735-715) 260 - - The chronology--A distracted kingdom--Dark pictures from - Isaiah--No sign of repentance--Grapes and wild grapes. - - CHAPTER XXIII - - ISAIAH AND AHAZ 265 - - Isaiah--Rezin and Pekah--Ahaz meets Isaiah--He receives a promise - of deliverance--He refuses a sign--The sign given - him--Immanuel--Birth of Messianic - prophecy--Maher-shalal-hash-baz--The promised Deliverer. - - CHAPTER XXIV - - THE APOSTASIES OF AHAZ 273 - - Moloch-worship--Sacrifice of children--Ahaz appeals to Assyria for - help--Ruin of Damascus and death of Rezin--Ahaz does homage to - Tiglath-Pileser at Damascus--Records of Tiglath-Pileser--The new - altar--Complaisance of the priest Urijah--Unpopularity of - Ahaz--Further misgivings--His death. - - CHAPTER XXV - - HEZEKIAH (B.C. 715-686) 287 - - Dates--Importance of the reign--Hezekiah's age--His character--His - reformation--Partial suppression of the _bamoth_--Removal of the - _matstseboth_ and _Asherim_--Destruction of the brazen - serpent--Trust in Jehovah--Psalm xlvi.--Chastisement of the - Philistines--Three parties in Jerusalem--1. The Assyrian party--2. - The Egyptian party--3. The national party--Its attitude to the - others--Micah--Mockery of Egypt--Anger and insults of the priests - against Isaiah--Confidence of Isaiah--Waverings of Hezekiah. - - CHAPTER XXVI - - HEZEKIAH'S SICKNESS--THE BABYLONIAN EMBASSY 305 - - The story of Hezekiah's illness misplaced--At the point of - death--Isaiah's message--The king's agony of mind--The prayer--The - reprieve--The sun-dial of Ahaz--The king's gratitude and - thanksgiving--Merodach-Baladan--Rising power of Babylon--Object of - the embassy--The king's action--The prophet's reproof--The king's - humble submission. - - CHAPTER XXVII - - HEZEKIAH AND ASSYRIA (B.C. 701) 319 - - Greatness of Sargon--His campaigns--Defeat of Egypt at the battle - of Raphia--Ashdod--Defeat of Merodach-Baladan--Grandeur of - Sennacherib--His invasion of Judaea--Earlier collisions--His - campaigns--1. Against Babylon--2. Against Elam--3. Against the - Hittites and Philistines--Defeat of the Ethiopian Tirhakah at - Altaqu--Heavy mulct imposed on Hezekiah--Siege of - Lachish--Sennacherib breaks his compact--Distress of Jerusalem. - - CHAPTER XXVIII - - THE GREAT DELIVERANCE (B.C. 701) 331 - - Embassy of the Turtan, the Rabsaris, and the Rabshakeh--Misery and - licence in the city--The conference--Oration of the Rabshakeh--Its - effect on the king's ministers and on the people--Taunting insults - of the Rabshakeh--Faithfulness and self-control of the - people--Heroic faith of Isaiah--Failure of the - embassy--Sennacherib's threatening letter--Hezekiah's - prayer--Isaiah promises deliverance in the name of Jehovah--The - sign--The angel of death--Scene of the catastrophe--The Egyptian - tradition of Sethos and the mice--Death and burial of - Hezekiah--The campaign as recorded on the Assyrian monuments--The - triumph of indomitable faith--Grandeur of Isaiah--Wane of - Assyria--Beautiful tolerance of Isaiah. - - CHAPTER XXIX - - MANASSEH (B.C. 686-641) 351 - - The name Manasseh--His tender age--Influence of evil - counsellors--Heathenising party--Their dislike of Hezekiah's - reformation and of the exclusive worship of Jehovah--Tendency to - trust in sacrifices and asceticism--Sanctification of - licence--Arguments of the heathenisers--Disparagement of the work - of Isaiah--Doubts and disbelief--Influence of the - _bamoth_-priests--Reliance on Assyria--The immoral and idolatrous - reaction--1. Restoration of the _bamoth_, and arguments in their - favour--2. Adoption of Phoenician nature-worship--3. Assyrian - Sabaism and star-worship--Connivance of the priests--4. Canaanite - Moloch-worship--5. Mesopotamian Shamanism--6. The - _Asherah_--Denunciation of the prophets--Persecution and the - shedding of innocent blood--Asserted captivity, repentance, and - reforming energy of Manasseh--Difficulties of the story--Reign of - Amon (B.C. 641-639)--Wretchedness of his reign--Zephaniah and - Jeremiah--Murder of Amon. - - CHAPTER XXX - - JOSIAH (B.C. 639-608) 374 - - Three vast movements--Jeremiah's earlier prophecies--The state of - society--The Scythians--Prophecies of Ezekiel--Herodotus--The fate - of Nineveh--Rise of the Chaldaeans--Habakkuk. - - CHAPTER XXXI - - JOSIAH'S REFORMATION 385 - - Growth of Josiah's character--Repairs of the Temple--Hilkiah finds - the Book of the Law--Intense effect produced on mind of the - king--His message to the prophetess Huldah--Great - assembly--Renewal of a solemn league and covenant with - Jehovah--The _bamoth_-priests degraded--Defiling of Tophet--He - carries the reformation into Samaria--Its stringency and - severity--The Passover--Suppression of heathen - corruptions--Jeremiah's share in the reformation--Its dangers and - disappointing results--Jeremiah's warnings against all trust in - externals--The prophecy of a new covenant--NOTE TO CHAPTER XXXI.: - The Book found in the Temple. - - CHAPTER XXXII - - THE DEATH OF JOSIAH (B.C. 608) 402 - - Prosperity and happiness of Josiah--Accession of the great Pharaoh - Necho II.--His excursion against Carchemish--Josiah determines to - bar his path--Warnings of Pharaoh Necho--Disaster at Megiddo and - death of Josiah--Mistaken hopes--God's dealings with men and - nations--Distress among Josiah's subjects--The king's - burial--Misgivings respecting the future--Sorrow of - Jeremiah--Ultimate fulfilments. - - CHAPTER XXXIII - - JEHOAHAZ (B.C. 608) 411 - - Four sons of Josiah--Shallum chosen by the people of the land--Elegy - of Ezekiel--Change of name from Shallum to Jehoahaz--Conquests of - Pharaoh Necho II.--Jehoahaz summoned to Riblah--Carried captive by - Pharaoh to Egypt--Tribute imposed on Judaea. - - CHAPTER XXXIV - - JEHOIAKIM (B.C. 608-597) 416 - - Eliakim--His change of name--Ignored by Ezekiel--Evil - influences--AEsthetic selfishness and oppressive - greed--Denunciation by Habakkuk--Denunciation by Jeremiah--Murder - of Urijah--Threatened murder of Jeremiah averted by Ahikam--Fall - of Nineveh--Utterances of the prophets--Rise of the - Chaldaeans--Nabopolassar--Defeat of Pharaoh Necho by - Nebuchadrezzar--His return to Babylon--His invasion of - Judaea--Beginning of the Babylonian captivity--Jehoiakim revolts to - Egypt in spite of Jeremiah's warnings--Imprisonment of - Jeremiah--Baruch--The menacing roll--Alarm of the princes--Rage of - the king--He cuts the scroll to pieces and burns it--Wretchedness - of the times--A great drought--Captives of Jerusalem--Miserable - death of Jehoiakim--"That which was found in him." - - CHAPTER XXXV - - JEHOIACHIN (B.C. 597) 431 - - Bad influence over him--His brief reign--Allusions to him by - Jeremiah at Jerusalem--Second captivity--Regret felt for - Jehoiachin--Did he die childless? - - CHAPTER XXXVI - - ZEDEKIAH, THE LAST KING OF JUDAH (B.C. 597-586) 437 - - His oath to the King of Assyria--Ezekiel's prophecies--The exiles - and the remnant--Weakness of Zedekiah--Continuance of idolatry as - described by Ezekiel--The king breaks his oath with - Assyria--Indignation and warnings of Jeremiah--The false prophet - Hananiah--The wooden and iron yokes--Death of Hananiah--False - prophets--The broken covenant--Advance of - Nebuchadrezzar--Belomancy and Babylonian divinations--Siege of - Jerusalem--Gloom of Jeremiah's prophecies. - - CHAPTER XXXVII - - JEREMIAH AND HIS PROPHECIES 449 - - Pathos of Jeremiah's lot--The sad epoch in which he - lived--Religious changes--Arrest of Jeremiah--Progress of the - siege--Zedekiah sends for the prophet--His hardships - alleviated--Horrors of famine--Wicked defiance--A sudden - death--Anger of the priests and nobles against Jeremiah--He is - thrust into a miry pit--Compassion of Ebed-Melech--Purchase of a - field at Anathoth--Secret interview with Zedekiah--It becomes - known--Distress of Zedekiah. - - CHAPTER XXXVIII - - THE FALL OF JERUSALEM (B.C. 586) 457 - - Nebuzaradan and the Babylonians--The final captivity--Dreadful - fate of Zedekiah--Prophecies of Ezekiel and Jeremiah--Sack of the - city--Massacre of the chief inhabitants--Burning of the city and - Temple--Desolation--Respect shown by the Babylonian general to - Jeremiah--He decides to remain with the remnant in Judaea. - - CHAPTER XXXIX - - GEDALIAH (B.C. 586) 465 - - Sad parting from the exiles--The wail at Ramah--Gedaliah's - appointment as satrap perhaps due to Jeremiah--Desolation of - Jerusalem--The seat of government removed to Mizpah--A respite and - a gleam of hope--Guerilla bands--Johanan warns Gedaliah against - Ishmael--Unsuspecting generosity of the governor--He receives - Ishmael and his confederates with hospitality--He is brutally - murdered--Massacre of the pilgrims from Shiloh--The horrible - well--Johanan pursues Ishmael--His escape--Proposal to migrate to - Egypt--Jeremiah consulted--His advice refused--Prophecy of - Jeremiah at the khan of Chimham--Kindness shown by Evil-Merodach - to Jehoiachin. - - EPILOGUE 477 - - The interest of the preceding history and the great moral lessons - which it involves--The central conceptions of Hebrew prophecy--The - end of the whole matter. - - APPENDIX I - - THE KINGS OF ASSYRIA, AND SOME OF THEIR INSCRIPTIONS 487 - - APPENDIX II - - INSCRIPTION IN THE TUNNEL OF THE POOL OF SILOAM 493 - - APPENDIX III - - WAS THERE A GOLDEN CALF AT DAN? 494 - - APPENDIX IV - - DATES OF THE KINGS OF ISRAEL AND JUDAH, AS GIVEN BY KITTEL AND - OTHER MODERN CRITICS 495 - - - - - THE SECOND BOOK OF KINGS - - - - -"Theories of inspiration which impaginate the Everlasting Spirit, and -make each verse a cluster of objectless and mechanical miracles, are -not seriously believed by any one: the Bible itself abides in its -endless power and unexhausted truth. All that is not of asbestos is -being burned away by the restless fires of thought and criticism. That -which remains is enough, and it is indestructible."--BISHOP OF DERRY. - - - - - CHAPTER I - - _AHAZIAH BEN-AHAB OF ISRAEL_ - - B.C. 855-854 - - 2 KINGS i. 1-18 - - "Ye know not of what spirit are ye."--LUKE ix. 55. - - "He is the mediator of a better covenant, which hath been enacted - upon better promises."--HEB. viii. 6. - - -Ahaziah, the eldest son and successor of Ahab, has been called "the most -shadowy of the Israelitish kings."[1] He seems to have been in all -respects one of the most weak, faithless, and deplorably miserable. He -did but reign two years--perhaps in reality little more than one; but -this brief space was crowded with intolerable disasters. Everything that -he touched seemed to be marked out for ruin or failure, and in character -he showed himself a true son of Jezebel and Ahab. - -What results followed the defeat of Ahab and Jehoshaphat at -Ramoth-Gilead we are not told. The war must have ended in terms of -peace of some kind--perhaps in the cession of Ramoth-Gilead; for -Ahaziah does not seem to have been disturbed during his brief reign by -any Syrian invasion. Nor were there any troubles on the side of Judah. -Ahaziah's sister was the wife of Jehoshaphat's heir, and the good -understanding between the two kingdoms was so closely cemented, that -in both royal houses there was an identity of names--two Ahaziahs and -two Jehorams. - -But even the Judaean alliance was marked with misfortune. Jehoshaphat's -prosperity and ambition, together with his firm dominance over -Edom--in which country he had appointed a vassal, who was sometimes -allowed the courtesy title of king[2]--led him to emulate Solomon by -an attempt to revive the old maritime enterprise which had astonished -Jerusalem with ivory, and apes, and peacocks imported from India. He -therefore built "ships of Tarshish" at Ezion-Geber to sail to Ophir. -They were called "Tarshish-ships," because they were of the same build -as those which sailed to Tartessus, in Spain, from Joppa. Ahaziah was -to some extent associated with him in the enterprise. But it turned -out even more disastrously than it had done in former times. So -unskilled was the seamanship of those days among all nations except -the Phoenicians, that the whole fleet was wrecked and shattered to -pieces in the very harbour of Ezion-Geber before it had set sail. - -Ahaziah, whose affinity with the King of Tyre and possession of some -of the western ports had given his subjects more knowledge of ships -and voyages, then proposed to Jehoshaphat that the vessels should be -manned with sailors from Israel as well as Judah. But Jehoshaphat was -tired of a futile and expensive effort. He refused a partnership which -might easily lead to complications, and on which the prophets of -Jehovah frowned. It was the last attempt made by the Israelites to -become merchants by sea as well as by land. - -Ahaziah's brief reign was marked by one immense humiliation. David, who -extended the dominion of the Hebrews in all directions, had smitten the -Moabites, and inflicted on them one of the horrible atrocities against -which the ill-instructed conscience of men in those days of ignorance -did not revolt.[3] He had made the male warriors lie on the ground, and -then, measuring them by lines, he put every two lines to death and kept -one alive. After this the Moabites had continued to be tributaries. They -had fallen to the share of the Northern Kingdom, and yearly acknowledged -the suzerainty of Israel by paying a heavy tribute of the fleeces of a -hundred thousand lambs and a hundred thousand rams. But now that the -warrior Ahab was dead, and Israel had been crushed by the catastrophe at -Ramoth-Gilead, Mesha, the energetic viceroy of Moab, seized his -opportunity to revolt and to break from the neck of his people the -odious yoke. The revolt was entirely successful. The sacred historian -gives us no details, but one of the most priceless of modern -archaeological discoveries has confirmed the Scriptural reference by -securing and translating a fragment of Mesha's own account of the -annals of his reign. We have, in what is called "The Moabite Stone," the -memorial written in glorification of himself and of his god Chemosh, -"the abomination of the children of Ammon," by a contemporary of Ahab -and Jehoshaphat.[4] It is the oldest specimen which we possess of Hebrew -writing; perhaps the only specimen, except the Siloam inscription, which -has come down to us from before the date of the Exile. It was discovered -in 1878 by the German missionary Klein, amid the ruins of the royal city -of Daibon (Dibon, Num. xxi. 30), and was purchased for the Berlin Museum -in 1879. Owing to all kinds of errors and intrigues, it did not remain -in the hands of its purchaser, but was broken into fragments by the -nomad tribe of Beni Hamide, from whom it was in some way obtained by M. -Clermont-Ganneau. There is no ground for questioning its perfect -genuineness, though the discovery of its value led to the forgery of a -number of spurious and often indecent inscriptions. There can be no -reasonable doubt that when we look at it we see before us the identical -memorial of triumph which the Moabite emir erected in the days of -Ahaziah on the _bamah_ of Chemosh at Dibon, one of his chief towns. - -This document is supremely interesting, not only for its historical -allusions, but also as an illustration of customs and modes of thought -which have left their traces in the records of the people of Jehovah, -as well as in those of the people of Chemosh.[5] Mesha tells us that -his father reigned in Dibon for thirty years, and that he succeeded. -He reared this stone to Chemosh in the town of Karcha, as a memorial -of gratitude for the assistance which had resulted in the overthrow of -all his enemies. Omri, King of Israel, had oppressed Moab many days, -because Chemosh was wroth with his people. Ahaziah wished to oppress -Moab as his father had done. But Chemosh enabled Mesha to recover -Medeba, and afterwards Baal-Meon, Kirjatan, Ataroth, Nebo, and Jahaz, -which he reoccupied and rebuilt. Perhaps they had been practically -abandoned by all effective Israelite garrisons. In some of these towns -he put the inhabitants under a ban, and sacrificed them to Moloch in a -great slaughter. In Nebo alone he slew seven thousand men. Having -turned many towns into fortresses, he was enabled to defy Israel -altogether, to refuse the old burdensome tribute, and to re-establish -a strong Moabite kingdom east of the Dead Sea; for Israel was wholly -unable to meet his forces in the open field. Month after month of the -reign of the miserable son of Ahab must have been marked by tidings of -shame, defeat, and massacre. - -Added to these public calamities, there came to Ahaziah a terrible -personal misfortune. As he was coming down from the roof of his -palace, he seems to have stopped to lean against the lattice of some -window or balcony in his upper chamber in Samaria.[6] It gave way -under his weight, and he was hurled down into the courtyard or street -below. He was so seriously hurt that he spent the rest of his reign on -a sick-bed in pain and weakness, and ultimately died of the injuries -he had received. - -A succession of woes so grievous might well have awakened the wretched -king to serious thought. But he had been trained under the idolatrous -influences of his mother. As though it were not enough for him to walk -in the steps of Ahab, of Jezebel, and of Jeroboam, he had the fatuity to -go out of his way to patronise another and yet more odious superstition. -Ekron was the nearest town to him of the Philistine Pentapolis, and at -Ekron was established the local cult of a particular Baal known as -Baal-Zebub ("the lord of flies").[7] Flies, which in temperate countries -are sometimes an intense annoyance, become in tropical climates an -intolerable plague. Even the Greeks had their Zeus Apomuios ("Zeus the -averter of flies"), and some Greek tribes worshipped Zeus Ipuktonos -("Zeus the slayer of vermin"), and Zeus Muiagros and Apomuios, and -Apollo Smintheus ("the destroyer of mice").[8] The Romans, too, among -the numberless quaint heroes of their Pantheon, had a certain Myiagrus -and Myiodes, whose function it was to keep flies at a distance.[9] This -fly-god, Baal-Zebub of Ekron, had an oracle, to whose lying responses -the young and superstitious prince attached implicit credence. That a -king of Israel professing any sort of allegiance to Jehovah, and having -hundreds of prophets in his own kingdom, should send an embassy to the -shrine of an abominable local divinity in a town of the -Philistines--whose chief object of worship was - - "That twice-battered god of Palestine, - Who mourned in earnest when the captive ark - Maimed his brute image on the grunsel edge - Where he fell flat, and shamed his worshippers"-- - -was, it must be admitted, an act of apostasy more outrageously -insulting than had ever yet been perpetrated by any Hebrew king. -Nothing can more clearly illustrate the callous indifference shown by -the race of Jezebel to the lessons which God had so decisively taught -them by Elijah and by Micaiah. - -But - - _Quem vult Deus perire, dementat prius_; - -and in this "dementation preceding doom" Ahaziah sent to ask the -fly-god's oracle whether he should recover of his injury. His -infatuated perversity became known to Elijah, who was bidden by "the -angel," or messenger, "of the Lord"--which may only be the recognised -phrase in the prophetic schools, putting in a concrete and vivid form -the voice of inward inspiration--to go up, apparently on the road -towards Samaria, and meet the messengers of Ahaziah on their way to -Ekron. Where Elijah was at the time we do not know. Ten years had -elapsed since the calling of Elisha, and four since Elijah had -confronted Ahab at the door of Naboth's vineyard. In the interval he -has not once been mentioned, nor can we conjecture with the least -certainty whether he had been living in congenial solitude or had -been helping to train the Sons of the Prophets in the high duties of -their calling. Why he had not appeared to support Micaiah we cannot -tell. Now, at any rate, the son of Ahab was drawing upon himself an -ancient curse by going a-whoring after wizards and familiar spirits, -and it was high time for Elijah to interfere.[10] - -The messengers had not proceeded far on their way when the prophet met -them, and sternly bade them go back to their king, with the -denunciation, "Is it because there is no God in Israel that ye go to -inquire of Baal-Zebub, the god of Ekron? Now, therefore, thus saith -Jehovah, 'Thou shalt not descend from that bed on which thou art gone -up, but dying thou shalt die.'" - -He spoke, and after his manner vanished with no less suddenness. - -The messengers, overawed by that startling apparition, did not dream -of daring to disobey. They at once went back to the king, who, -astonished at their reappearance before they could possibly have -reached the oracle, asked them why they had returned. - -They told him of the apparition by which they had been confronted. -That it was a prophet who had spoken to them they knew; but the -appearances of Elijah had been so few, and at such long intervals, -that they knew not who he was. - -"What sort of man was he that spoke to you?" asked the king. - -"He was," they answered, "a lord of hair,[11] and girded about his -loins with a girdle of skin."[12] - -Too well did Ahaziah recognise from this description the enemy of his -guilty race! If he had not been present on Carmel, or at Jezreel, on -the occasions when that swart and shaggy figure of the awful Wanderer -had confronted his father, he must have often heard descriptions of -this strange Bedawy ascetic who "feared man so little because he -feared God so much." - -"It is Elijah the Tishbite!" he exclaimed, with a bitterness which was -succeeded by fierce wrath; and with something of his mother's -indomitable rage he sent a captain with fifty soldiers to arrest him. - -The captain found Elijah sitting at the top of "the hill," perhaps of -Carmel; and what followed is thus described:-- - -"Thou man of God," he cried, "the king hath said, Come down." - -There was something strangely incongruous in this rude address. The -title "man of God" seems first to have been currently given to Elijah, -and it recognises his inspired mission as well as the supernatural -power which he was believed to wield. How preposterous, then, was it -to bid a man of God to obey a king's order and to give himself up to -imprisonment or death! - -"If I be a man of God," said Elijah, "then let fire come down from -heaven, to consume thee and thy fifty."[13] - -The fire fell and reduced them all to ashes.[14] - -Undeterred by so tremendous a consummation, the king sent another -captain with his fifty, who repeated the order in terms yet more -imperative.[15] - -Again Elijah called down the fire from heaven, and the second captain -with his fifty soldiers was reduced to ashes. - -For the third time the obstinate king, whose infatuation must indeed -have been transcendent, despatched a captain with his fifty. But he, -warned by the fate of his predecessors, went up to Elijah and fell on -his knees, and implored him to spare the life of himself and his fifty -innocent soldiers. - -Then "the angel of the Lord" bade Elijah go down to the king with him -and not be afraid. - -What are we to think of this narrative? - -Of course, if we are to judge it on such moral grounds as we learn from -the spirit of the Gospel, Christ Himself has taught us to condemn it. -There have been men who so hideously misunderstood the true lessons of -revelation as to applaud such deeds, and hold them up for modern -imitation. The dark persecutors of the Spanish Inquisition, nay, even -men like Calvin and Beza, argued from this scene that "fire is the -proper instrument for the punishment of heretics." To all who have been -thus misled by a false and superstitious theory of inspiration, Christ -Himself says, with unmistakable plainness, as He said to the Sons of -Thunder at Engannim, "Ye know not what spirit ye are of. I am not come -to destroy men's lives, but to save."[16] In the abstract, and judged by -Christian standards, the calling down of lightning to consume more than -a hundred soldiers, who were but obeying the orders of a king--the -protection of personal safety by the miraculous destruction of a king's -messengers--could only be regarded as a deed of horror. "There are few -tracks of Elijah that are ordinary and fit for common feet," says Bishop -Hall; and he adds, "Not in his own defence would the prophet have been -the death of so many, if God had not, by a peculiar instinct, made him -an instrument of His just vengeance."[17] - -For myself, I more than doubt whether we have any right to appeal to -these "peculiar instincts" and unrecorded inspirations; and it is so -important that we should not form utterly false views of what -Scripture does and does not teach, that we must once more deal with -this narrative quite plainly, and not beat about the bush with the -untenable devices and effeminate euphemisms of commentators, who give -us the "to-and-fro-conflicting" apologies of _a priori_ theory instead -of the clear judgments of inflexible morality. - -"It is impossible not to feel," says Professor Milligan,[18] "that the -events thus presented to us are of a very startling kind, and that it -is not easy to reconcile them either with the conception that we form -of an honoured servant of God, or with our ideas of eternal justice. -Elijah rather appears to us at first sight as a proud, arrogant, and -merciless wielder of the power committed to him: we wonder that an -answer should have been given to his prayer; we are shocked at the -destruction of so many men, who listened only to the command of their -captain and their king; and we cannot help contrasting Elijah's -conduct, as a whole, with the beneficent and loving tenderness of the -New Testament dispensation." - -Professor Milligan proceeds rightly to set aside the attempts which -have been made to represent the first two captains and their fifties -as especially guilty--which is a most flimsy hypothesis, and would not -in any case touch the heart of the matter. He says that the event -stands on exactly the same footing as the slaughter of the 450 -prophets of Baal at Kishon, and of the 3000 idolaters by order of -Moses at Sinai; the swallowing up of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram; the -ban of total extirpation on Jericho and on Canaan; the sweeping -massacre of the Amalekites by Saul; and many similar instances of -recorded savagery. But the reference to analogous acts furnishes no -justification for those acts. What, then, is their justification, if -any can be found? - -Some would defend them on the grounds that the potter may do what he -likes with the clay. That analogy, though perfectly admissible when -used for the purpose to which it is applied by St. Paul, is grossly -inapplicable to such cases as this. St. Paul uses it simply to prove -that we cannot judge or understand the purposes of God, in which, as -he shows, mercy often lies behind apparent severity. But, when urged -to maintain the rectitude of sweeping judgments in which a man arms -his own feebleness with the omnipotence of Heaven, they amount to no -more than the tyrant's plea that "might makes right." "Man is a reed," -said Pascal, "but he is a _thinking_ reed." He may not therefore be -indiscriminately crushed. He was made by God in His image, after His -likeness, and therefore his rights have a Divine and indefeasible -sanction. - -All that can be said is that these deeds of wholesale severity were -not in disaccord with the conscience even of many of the best Old -Testament saints. They did not feel the least compunction in -inflicting judgments on whole populations in a way which would argue -in us an infamous callousness. Nay, their consciences approved of -those deeds; they were but acting up to the standard of their times, -and they regarded themselves as righteous instruments of divinely -directed vengeance.[19] Take, for instance, the frightful Eastern law -which among the Jews no less than among Babylonians and Persians -thought nothing of overwhelming the innocent with the guilty in the -same catastrophe; which required the stoning, not only of Achan, but -of all Achan's innocent family, as an expiation for his theft; and the -stoning, not only of Naboth, but also of Naboth's sons, in requital -for his asserted blasphemy. Two reasons may be assigned for the chasm -between their moral sense and ours on such subjects--one was their -amazing indifference to the sacredness of human life, and the other -their invariable habit of regarding men in their corporate relations -rather than in their individual capacity. Our conscience teaches us -that to slay the innocent with the guilty is an action of monstrous -injustice;[20] but they, regarding each person as indissolubly mixed -up with all his family and tribe, magnified the conception of -_corporate responsibility_, and merged the individual in the mass. - -It is clear that, if we take the narrative literally, Elijah would not -have felt the least remorse in calling fire from heaven to consume these -scores of soldiers, because the prophetic narrator who recorded the -story, perhaps two centuries later, must have understood the spirit of -those days, and certainly felt no shame for the prophet's act of -vengeance. On the contrary, he relates it with entire approval for the -glorification of his hero. We cannot blame him for not rising above the -moral standard of his age. He held that the natural manifestation of an -angry Jehovah was, literally or metaphorically, in consuming fire. -Considering the slow education of mankind in the most elementary -principles of mercy and righteousness, we must not judge the views of -prophets who lived so many ages before Christ by those of religious -teachers who enjoy the inherited experience of two millenniums of -Christianity. Thus much is plainly taught us by Christ Himself, and -there perhaps we might be content to leave the question. But we are -compelled to ask, Do we not too much form all our judgments of the -Scripture narratives on _a priori_ traditions and unreasoned prejudices? -Can we with adequate knowledge and honest conviction declare our -certainty that this scene of destruction ever occurred as a literal -fact? If we turn to any of the great students and critics of Germany, to -whom we are indebted for the floods of light which their researches have -thrown on the sacred page, they with almost consentient voice regard -these details of this story as legendary. There is indeed every reason -to believe the account of Ahaziah's accident, of his sending to consult -the oracle of Baal-Zebub, of the turning back of his messengers by -Elijah, and of the menace which he heard from the prophet's lips. But -the calling down of lightning to consume his captains and soldiers to -ashes belongs to the cycle of Elijah-traditions preserved in the schools -of the prophets; and in the case of miracles so startling and to our -moral sense so repellent--miracles which assume the most insensate folly -on the part of the king, and the most callous ruthlessness on the part -of the prophet--the question may be fairly asked, Is there any proof, is -there anything beyond dogmatic assertion to convince us, that we were -intended to accept them _au pied de la lettre_? May they not be the -formal vehicle chosen for the illustration of the undoubted powers and -righteous mission of Elijah as the upholder of the worship of Jehovah? -In a literature which abounds, as all Eastern literature abounds, in -vivid and concrete methods of indicating abstract truths, have we any -cogent proof that the supernatural details, of which some may have been -introduced into these narratives by the scribes in the schools of the -prophets, were not, in some instances, _meant_ to be regarded as -imaginative apologues? The most orthodox divines, both Jewish and -Christian, have not hesitated to treat the Book of Jonah as an instance -of the use of fiction for purposes of moral and spiritual edification. -Were any critic to maintain that the story of the destruction of -Ahaziah's emissaries belongs to the same class of narratives, I do not -know how he could be refuted, however much he might be denounced by -stereotyped prejudice and ignorance. I do not, however, myself regard -the story as a mere parable composed to show how awful was the power of -the prophets, and how fearfully it might be exercised. I look upon it -rather as possibly the narrative of some event which has been -imaginatively embellished, and intermingled with details which we call -supernatural.[21] Circumstances which we consider natural would be -regarded as directly miraculous by an Eastern enthusiast, who saw in -every event the immediate act of Jehovah to the exclusion of all -secondary causes, and who attributed every occurrence of life to the -intervention of those "millions of spiritual creatures," who - - "walk the earth - Unseen both when we wake and when we sleep." - -If such a supposition be correct and admissible--and assuredly it is -based on all that we increasingly learn of the methods of Eastern -literature, and of the forms in which religious ideas were inculcated -in early ages--then all difficulties are removed. We are not dealing -with the mercilessness of a prophet, or the wielding of Divine powers -in a manner which higher revelation condemns, but only with the -well-known fact that the Elijah-spirit was not the Christ-spirit, and -that the scribes of Ramah or Gilgal, and "the men of the tradition" -and the "men of letters" who lived at Jabez, when they used the -methods of Targum and Haggadah in handing down the stories of the -prophets, had not received that full measure of enlightenment which -came only when the Light of the World had shone.[22] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[1] Rawlinson, _Kings of Israel and Judah_, p. 86. "The name of -Ahaziah ('the Lord taketh hold'), like that of all Ahab's sons, -testifies to the fact that the husband of Jezebel still worshipped -Jehovah. Among the names of the judges and kings before Ahab in -Israel, and Asa in Judah, scarcely a single instance occurs of names -compounded with Jehovah; thenceforward they became the rule" -(Wellhausen, _Israel and Judah_, Es. 1, p. 66). - -[2] 1 Kings xxii. 47; 2 Kings iii. 9: comp. viii. 20. - -[3] 2 Sam. viii. 2. On the ethics of these wars of extermination, such -as are commanded in the Pentateuch, and were practised by Joshua, -Samuel, Saul, David, and others, see Josh. vi. 17; 1 Sam. xv. 3, 33; 2 -Sam. viii. 2, etc., and Mozley's _Lectures on the Old Testament_, pp. -83-103. - -[4] See Stade, i. 86. He gives a photograph and translation of it at -p. 534. - -[5] See _Records of the Past_, xi. 166, 167. - -[6] 2 Kings i. 2; Heb., _be'ad hass'bakah_; LXX., [Greek: dia tou -diktuotou]; Vulg., _per cancellos_ (comp. 1 Kings vii. 18; 2 Chron. -iv. 12). - -[7] LXX., [Greek: Baal muian theon Akkaron]. So, too, Jos., _Antt._, -IX. ii. 1. It is possible that the god was represented holding a fly -as the type of pestilence, just as the statue of Pthah held in its -hands a mouse (Herod., ii. 141). Flies convey all kinds of contagion -(Plin., _H. N._, x. 28). - -[8] Pausan., v. 14, Sec. 2. - -[9] The name, or a derisive modification of it, was given by the Jews -in the days of Christ to the prince of the devils. In Matt. xii. 24 -the true reading is [Greek: Beelzeboul], which perhaps means (in -contempt) "the lord of dung"; but might mean "the lord of the -[celestial] habitation" ([Greek: oikodespoten]). Comp. Matt. x. 25; -Eph. ii. 2; "Baal Shamaim," the Belsamen of Augustine (Gesen., _Monum. -Phoenic._, 387; Movers, _Phoenizier_, i. 176). For "opprobrious puns" -applied to idols, see Lightfoot, _Exercitationes ad Matt._, xii. 24. -The common word for idols, _gilloolim_, is perhaps connected with -_galal_, "dung." Hitzig thinks that the god was represented under the -symbol of the _Scarabaeus pillularius_, or dung-beetle. - -[10] Lev. xx. 6. - -[11] [Hebrew: ba'alsetzar] (LXX., [Greek: dasus]), whether in reference -to his long shaggy locks, or his sheepskin _addereth_, [Greek: melote] -(Zech. xiii. 4; Heb. xii. 37). - -[12] [Greek: zone dermatine] (Matt iii. 4). - -[13] There is perhaps an intentional play of words between "man -([Hebrew: yosh]) of God" and "fire ([Hebrew: 'osh]) of God" -(Klostermann). - -[14] Hebrew. - -[15] "Come down _quickly_" (2 Kings i. 9). - -[16] Luke ix. 51-56. This is a more than sufficient answer to the -censure of Theodoret, that "they who condemn the prophet are wagging -their tongues against God." The remark is based on utter -misapprehension; and if we are to form no judgment on the morality of -Scripture examples, they would be of no help for us. Compare the -striking remark of the minister to Balfour of Burleigh in Scott's _Old -Mortality_. - -[17] Quoted by Rev. Professor Lumby, _ad loc._ - -[18] _Elijah_, p. 146. - -[19] This is practically the sum-total of the answer given again and -again by Canon Mozley in his _Lectures on the Old Testament_, 2nd -edition, 1878. For instance, he says that "the Jewish idea of justice -gives us the reason why the Divine commands (of exterminating wars, -etc.) were then adapted to man as the agent for executing them, and -are not adapted now" (p. 102). - -[20] Comp. Ezek. xviii. 2-30. - -[21] For the _idea_ involved see Num. xi. 1; Deut. iv. 24; Psalm xxi. -9; Isa. xxvi. 11; Heb. x. 27, etc. - -[22] 1 Chron. ii. 55, where "Shimeathites" means "men of the -tradition," and "scribes," "men of letters." - - - - - CHAPTER II - - _THE ASCENSION OF ELIJAH_ - - 2 KINGS ii. 1-18 - - [Greek: Elias ex anthropon ephanisthe, kai oudeis egno mechris tes - semeron autou ten teleuten.]--JOS., _Antt._, IX. ii. 2. - - [Greek: Gegonasin aphaneis, thanaton de auton oudeis oiden.]--ST. - EPHRAEM SYRUS. - - -The date of the assumption of Elijah is wholly uncertain, and it -becomes still more so because of the confusion of chronological order -which results from the composite character of the records here -collected. It appears from various scattered notices that Elijah lived -on till the reign of Jehoram of Judah, whereas the narrative in this -chapter is placed before the death of Jehoshaphat. - -When the time came that "Jehovah would take up Elijah by a whirlwind -into heaven," the prophet had a prevision of his approaching end, and -determined for the last time to visit the hills of his native Gilead. -The story of his end, though not written in rhythm, is told in a style -of the loftiest poetry, resembling other ancient poems in its simple -and solemn repetitions. On his way to Gilead, Elijah desires to visit -ancient sanctuaries where schools of the prophets were now -established, and accompanied by Elisha, whose faithful ministrations -he had enjoyed for ten almost silent years, he went to Gilgal. This -was not the Gilgal in the Jordan valley so famous in the days of -Joshua,[23] but _Jiljilia_ in the hills of Ephraim,[24] where many -young prophets were in course of training.[25] - -Knowing that he was on his way to death, Elijah felt the imperious -instinct which leads the soul to seek solitude at the supreme crises -of life. He would have preferred that even Elisha should leave him, -and he bade him stop at Gilgal, because the Lord had sent him as far -as Bethel. But Elisha was determined to see the end, and exclaimed -with strong asseveration, "As Jehovah liveth, and as thy soul liveth, -I will not leave thee." - -So they went on to Bethel, where there was another school of prophets, -under the immediate shadow of Jeroboam's golden calf, though we are -not told whether they continued the protest of the old nameless seer -from Judah, or not.[26] Here the youths of the college came -respectfully to Elisha--for they were prevented by a sense of awe from -addressing Elijah--and asked him "whether he knew that that day God -would take away his master." "Yes, I know it," he answers; but--for -this is no subject for idle talk--"hold ye your peace." - -Once more Elijah tries to shake off the attendance of his friend and -disciple. He bids him stay at Bethel, since Jehovah has sent him on to -Jericho. Once more Elisha repeats his oath that he will not leave -him, and once more the sons of the prophets at Jericho, who warn him -of what is coming, are told to say no more. - -But little of the journey now remains. In vain Elijah urges Elisha to -stay at Jericho; they proceed to Jordan. Conscious that some great -event is impending, and that Elijah is leaving these scenes for ever, -fifty of the sons of the prophets watch the two as they descend the -valley to the river. Here they saw Elijah take off his mantle of hair, -roll it up, and smite the waters with it. The waters part asunder, and -the prophets pass over dry-shod.[27] As they crossed over Elijah asks -Elisha what he should do for him, and Elisha entreats that a double -portion of Elijah's spirit may rest upon him. By this he does not mean -to ask for twice Elijah's power and inspiration, but only for an elder -son's portion, which was twice what was inherited by the younger -sons.[28] "Thou hast asked a hard thing," said Elijah; "but if thou -seest me when I am taken hence, it shall be so." - -The sequel can be only told in the words of the text: "And it came to -pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared -a chariot of fire, and horses of fire,[29] and parted them both -asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven. And Elisha saw -it, and he cried, 'My father, my father, the chariots of Israel, and -the horsemen thereof!'[30] And he saw him no more." - -Respecting the manner in which Elijah ended his earthly career, we -know nothing beyond what is conveyed by this splendid narrative. His -death, like that of Moses, was surrounded by mystery and miracles, and -we can say nothing further about it. The question must still remain -unanswered for many minds whether it was intended by the prophetic -annalists for literal history, for spiritual allegory, or for actual -events bathed in the colourings of an imagination to which the -providential assumed the aspect of the supernatural.[31] We are twice -told that "Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven,"[32] and in that -storm--which would have seemed a fit scene for the close of a career -of storm--God, in the high poetry of the Psalmist, may have made the -winds His angels, and the flames of fire His ministers. For us it must -suffice to say of Elijah, as the Book of Genesis says of Enoch, that -"he was not, for God took him." - -Elisha signalised the removal of his master by a burst of natural -grief. He seized his garments and rent them in twain. Elijah had -dropped his mantle of skin, and his grieving disciple took it with him -as a priceless relic.[33] The legendary St. Antony bequeathed to St. -Athanasius the only thing which he had, his sheepskin mantle; and in -the mantle of Elijah his successor inherited his most characteristic -and almost his sole possession. He returned to Jordan, and with this -mantle he smote the waters as Elijah had done. At first they did not -divide;[34] but when he exclaimed, "Where is the Lord, the God of -Elijah, even He?" they parted hither and thither. Seeing the portent, -the sons of the prophets came with humble prostrations, and -acknowledged him as their new leader. - -They were not, however, satisfied with what they had seen, or had -heard from Elisha, of the departure of the great prophet, and begged -leave to send fifty strong men to search whether the wind of the Lord -had not swept him away to some mountain or valley. Elisha at first -refused, but afterwards yielded to their persistent importunity. They -searched for three days among the hills of Gilead, but found him not, -either living or dead, as Elisha had warned them would be the case. - -From that time forward Elijah has taken his place in all Jewish and -Mohammedan legends as the mysterious and deathless wanderer. Malachi -spoke of him as destined to appear again to herald the coming of the -Messiah,[35] and Christ taught His disciples that John the Baptist had -come in the spirit and power of Elijah. In Jewish legend he often -appears and disappears. A chair is set for him at the circumcision of -every Jewish child. At the Paschal feast the door is set open for him -to enter. All doubtful questions are left for decision until he comes -again. To the Mohammedans he is known as the wonder-working and awful -El Khudr.[36] - -Elisha is mentioned but once in all the later books of Scripture; but -Elijah is mentioned many times, and the son of Sirach sums up his -greatness when he says: "Then stood up Elias as fire, and his word -burned like a torch. O Elias, how wast thou honoured in thy wondrous -deeds! and who may glory like unto thee--who anointed kings to take -revenge, and prophets to succeed after him--who wast ordained for -reproof in their times, to pacify the wrath of the Lord's judgment -before it broke forth into fury, and to turn the heart of the father -unto the son, and to restore the tribes of Jacob! Blessed are they -that saw thee and slept in love; for we shall surely live!" - -FOOTNOTES: - -[23] Josh. iv. 19; v. 9, 10. - -[24] Deut. xi. 30. It is on a hill south-west of Shiloh (_Seilun_), -near the road to Jericho (Hos. iv. 15; Amos iv. 4). The name means "a -circle," and there may have been an ancient circle of sacred stones -there. - -[25] 2 Kings iv. 38. - -[26] 1 Kings xiii. - -[27] As there are fords at Jericho, the object of this miracle, as of -the one subsequently ascribed to Elisha, is not self-evident. Nothing -is more certain than that there is a Divine economy in the exercise of -supernatural powers. The pomp and prodigality of superfluous portents -belong, not to Scripture, but to the _Acta sanctorum_, and the -saint-stories of Arabia and India. - -[28] Deut. xxi. 17. The Hebrew is [Hebrew: pi-shenayim], "a mouthful, -or ration of two." Comp. Gen. xliii. 34. Even Ewald's "_Nur -Zweidrittel und auch diese kaum_" is too strong (_Gesch._, iii. 517). -In no sense was Elisha greater than Elijah: he wrought more wonders, -but he left little of his teaching, and produced on the mind of his -nation a far less strong impression. - -[29] In 2 Kings vi. 17 the stormblast (_sa'arah_) and chariots and -horses of fire are part of a vision of the Divine protection. Comp. -Isa. lxvi. 15; Job xxxviii, 1; Nah. i. 3; Psalms xviii. 6-15, civ. 3. - -[30] That is, the protection and defence of Israel by thy prayers. - -[31] Even the Church-father St. Ephraem Syrus evidently felt some -misgivings. He says: "Suddenly there came from the height a storm of -fire, and in the midst of the flame the form of a chariot and horses, -and parted them both asunder; the one of them it left on the earth, the -other it carried to the height; but whether the wind carried him, or in -what place it left him, the Scripture has not informed us, but it says -that after some years, a terrifying letter from him full of menaces, was -delivered to King Jehoram of Judah" (quoted by Keil _ad loc._). See 2 -Chron. xxi. 12. The letter is called "a writing" (_miktab_). - -[32] 2 Kings ii. 11; Ecclus. xlviii. 12. The LXX. curiously says [Greek: -en susseismo hos eis ton ouranon]. So too the Rabbis, _Sucah_, f. 5. - -[33] The circumstance has left its trace in the proverbs of nations, -and in the German word _Mantelkind_ for a spiritual successor. - -[34] 2 Kings ii. 14. LXX., [Greek: kai ou dierethe]; Vulg., _Percussit -aquas, et non sunt divisae_. - -[35] Mal. iv. 4-6. - -[36] _Bava-Metzia_, f. 37, 2, etc. His name is used for incantations in -the Kabbala. _Kitsur Sh'lh_, f. 71, 1 (Hershon, _Talmudic Miscellany_, -p. 340). The chair set for him is called "the throne of Elijah." For -many Rabbinic legends see Hershon, _Treasures of the Talmud_, pp. -172-178. The Persians regard him as the teacher of Zoroaster. - - - - - CHAPTER III - - _ELISHA_ - - 2 KINGS ii. 1-25 - - "He did wonders in his life, and at death even his works were - marvellous. For all this the people repented not."--ECCLUS. - xlviii. 14, 15. - - -At this point we enter into the cycle of supernatural stories, which -gathered round the name of Elisha in the prophetic communities. Some of -them are full of charm and tenderness; but in some cases it is difficult -to point out their intrinsic superiority over the ecclesiastical -miracles with which monkish historians have embellished the lives of the -saints. We can but narrate them as they stand, for we possess none of -the means for critical or historical analysis which might enable us to -discriminate between essential facts and accidental elements. - -We see at once that the figure of Elisha[37] is far less impressive -than that of Elijah. He inspires less of awe and terror. He lives far -more in cities and amid the ordinary surroundings of civilised life. -The honour with which he was treated was the honour of respect and -admiration for his kindliness. He plays his part in no stupendous -scenes like those at Carmel and at Horeb, and nearly all his miracles -were miracles of mercy. Other remarkable differences are observable -in the records of Elijah and Elisha. In the case of the former his -main work was the opposition to Baal-worship; but although -Baal-worship still prevailed (2 Kings x. 18-27) we read of no protests -raised by Elisha against it. "With him"--perhaps it should be more -accurately said, in the narrative which tells us of him--"the miracles -are everything, the prophetic work nothing." The conception of a -prophet's mission in these stories of him differs widely from that -which dominates the splendid _midrash_ of Elijah. - -His separate career began with an act of beneficence. He had stopped for -a time at Jericho. The curse of the rebuilding of the town upon a site -which Joshua had devoted to the ban had expended itself on Hiel, its -builder. It was now a flourishing city, and the home of a large school -of prophets. But though the situation was pleasant as "a garden of the -Lord,"[38] the water was bad, and the land "miscarried." In other words, -the deleterious spring caused diseases among the inhabitants, and caused -the trees to cast their fruit. So the men of the city came to Elisha, -and humbly addressing him as "my lord," implored his help. He told them -to bring him a new cruse full of salt, and going with it to the fountain -cast it into the springs, proclaiming in Jehovah's name that they were -healed, and that there should be no more death or miscarrying land. The -gushing waters of the Ain-es-Sultan, fed by the spring of Quarantania, -are to this day pointed out as the Fountains of Elisha, as they have -been since the days of Josephus.[39] - -The anecdote of this beautiful interposition to help a troubled city is -followed by one of the stories which naturally repel us more than any -other in the Old Testament. Elisha, on leaving Jericho, returned to -Bethel, and as he climbed through the forest up the ascent leading to -the town through what is now called the Wady Suweinit, a number of young -lads--with the rudeness which in boys is often a venial characteristic -of their gay spirits or want of proper training, and which to this day -is common among boys in the East--laughed at him, and mocked him with -the cry "Go up, round-head! go up, round-head!"[40] What struck these -ill-bred and irreverent youngsters was the contrast between the rough -hair-skin garb and unkempt shaggy locks of Elijah, "the lord of hair," -and the smooth civilised aspect and shorter hair of his disciple. If the -word _quereach_ means "bald"[41] we see an additional reason for their -ill-mannered jeers, since baldness was a cause of reproach and suspicion -in the East, where it is comparatively rare. No doubt, too, the conduct -of these young scoffers was the more offensive, and even the more -wicked, because of the deeper reverence for age which prevails in -Eastern countries, and above all because Elisha was known as a prophet. -Perhaps, too, if some other reading lies behind the [Greek: elithazon] -of one MS. of the Septuagint, they pelted him with stones.[42] That -Elisha should have rebuked them, and that seriously--that he should even -have inflicted some punishment upon them to reform their manners--would -have been natural; but we cannot repress the shudder with which we read -the verse, "And he turned back and looked on them, and cursed them in -the name of the Lord. And there came forth two she-bears out of the -wood, and tare forty-and-two children of them." Surely the punishment -was disproportionate to the offence! Who could doom so much as a single -rude boy, not to speak of forty-two, to a horrible and agonising death -for shouting after any one? It is the chief exception to the general -course of Elisha's compassionate interpositions. Here, too, we must -leave the narrative where it is; but we hold it quite admissible to -conjecture that the incident, in some form or other, really -occurred--that the boys were insolent, and that some of them may have -been killed by the wild beasts which at that time abounded in -Palestine--and yet that the _nuances_ of the story which cause deepest -offence to us may have suffered from some corruption of the tradition in -the original records, and may admit of being represented in a slightly -different form. - -After this Elisha went for a time to the ancient haunts of his master -on Mount Carmel, and thence returned to Samaria, the capital of his -country, which he seems to have chosen for his most permanent -dwelling-place. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[37] The name Elisha means "My God is salvation." - -[38] Gen. xiii. 10. "The city of palms" (Deut. xxxiv. 3). - -[39] Jos., _B. J._, IV. viii. 3; Robinson, _Bibl. Researches_, i. 554. - -[40] Abarbanel's notion that they meant "Ascend to heaven as Elijah -did" is absurd. - -[41] [Hebrew: kereha] This means bald at the back of the head, as -[Hebrew: nibbeha] (_gibbeach_), means "forehead-bald" (Ewald, iii. -512). Elisha could not have been bald from old age, since he lived on -for nearly sixty years, and must have been a young man. Baldness -involved a suspicion of leprosy, and was disliked by Easterns (Lev. -xxi. 5, xiii. 43; Isa. iii. 17, 24, xv. 2), as much as by the Romans -(Suet., _Jul. Caes._, 45; _Domit._, 18). Elisha's prophetic activity -lasted through the reigns of Joram, Jehu, Jehoahaz, and Joash (_i.e._, -12 + 28 + 17 + 2 years). - -[42] The [Greek: katepaizon] of the Vat. LXX. implies persistent and -vehement insult. The Post-Mishnic Rabbis, however, say that Elisha was -punished with sickness for this deed (_Bava-Metzia_, f. 87, 1). - - - - - CHAPTER IV - - _THE INVASION OF MOAB_ - - 2 KINGS iii. 4-27 - - "What reinforcement we may gain from hope, - If not, what resolution from despair." - MILTON, _Paradise Lost_, i. 190. - - -Ahaziah, as Elijah had warned him, never recovered from the injuries -received in his fall through the lattice, and after his brief and -luckless reign died without a child. He was succeeded by his brother -Jehoram ("Jehovah is exalted"), who reigned for twelve years.[43] - -Jehoram began well. Though it is said that he did "that which was evil -in the sight of the Lord," we are told that he was not so guilty as his -father or his mother. He did not, of course, abolish the worship of -Jehovah under the cherubic symbol of the calves; no king of Israel -thought of doing that, and so far as we know neither Elijah, nor Elisha, -nor Jonah, nor Micaiah, nor any genuine prophet of Israel before Hosea, -ever protested against that worship, which was chiefly disparaged by -prophets of Judah like Amos and the nameless seer.[44] But Jehoram at -least removed the _Matstsebah_ or stone obelisk which had been reared in -Baal's honour in front of his temple by Ahab, or by Jezebel in his -name.[45] In this direction, however, his reformation must have been -exceedingly partial, for until the sweeping measures taken by Jehu the -temple and images of Baal still continued to exist in Samaria under his -very eyes, and must have been connived at if not approved. - -The first great measure which occupied the thoughts of Jehoram was to -subdue the kingdom of Moab, which had been restored to independence by -the bravery of the great pastoral-king Mesha;[46] or at any rate to -avenge the series of humiliating defeats which Mesha had inflicted on -his brother Ahaziah. A war of forty years' duration[47] had ended in the -complete success of Moab. The loss of a tribute of the fleeces of one -hundred thousand lambs and one hundred thousand rams was too serious to -be lightly faced.[48] Jehoram laid his plans well. First he ordered a -muster of all the men of war throughout his kingdom, and then appealed -for the co-operation of Jehoshaphat and his vassal-king of Edom. Both -kings consented to join him. Jehoshaphat had already been the victim of -a powerful and wanton aggression on the part of King Mesha,[49] from -which he had been delivered by the panic of his foes in the Valley of -Salt. Though the king of Edom had, on that occasion, been an ally of -Mesha, the forces of Edom had fallen the first victims of that -internecine panic. Both Judah and Edom, therefore, had grave wrongs to -avenge, and eagerly seized the opportunity to humble the growing pride -of the people of Chemosh. The attack was wisely arranged. It was -determined to advance against Moab from the south, through the territory -of Edom, by a rough and mountainous track, and, as far as possible, to -take the nation by surprise. The combined host took a seven days' -circuit round the south of the Dead Sea, hoping to find an abundant -supply of water in the stream which flows through the Wady-el-Ahsa, -which separates Edom from Moab.[50] But owing to recent droughts the -Wady was waterless, and the armies, with their horses, suffered all the -agonies of thirst. Jehoram gave way to despair, bewailing that Jehovah -should have brought together these three kings to deliver them a -helpless prey into the hands of Moab. But the pious Jehoshaphat at once -thinks of "inquiring of the Lord" by some true prophet, and one of -Jehoram's courtiers informs him that no less a person than Elisha, the -son of Shaphat, who had been the attendant of Elijah, is with the -host.[51] We are surprised to find that his presence in the camp had -excited so little attention as to be unknown to the king;[52] but -Jehoshaphat, on hearing his name, instantly acknowledged his prophetic -inspiration. So urgent was the need, and so deep the sense of Elisha's -greatness, that the three kings in person went on an embassy "to the -servant of him who ran before the chariot of Ahab." Their humble appeal -to him produced so little elation in his mind that, addressing Jehoram, -who was the most powerful, he exclaimed, with rough indignation: "What -have I to do with thee? Get thee to the prophets of thy -father,"--nominal prophets of Jehovah, who will say to thee smooth -things and prophesy deceits, as four hundred of them did to Ahab--"and -to the Baal-prophets of thy mother." Instead of resenting this scant -respect Jehoram, in utmost distress, deprecated the prophet's anger, and -appealed to his pity for the peril of the three armies. But Elisha is -not mollified. He tells Jehoram that but for the presence of Jehoshaphat -he would not so much as look at him: so completely was the destiny of -the people mixed up with the character of their kings! Out of respect -for Jehoshaphat Elisha will do what he can. But all his soul is in a -tumult of emotion. For the moment he can do nothing. He needs to be -calmed from his agitation by the spell of music, and bids them send a -minstrel to him. The harper came, and as Elisha listened his soul was -composed, and "the hand of the Lord came upon him" to illuminate and -inspire his thoughts.[53] The result was that he bade them dig trenches -in the dry wady, and promised that, though they should see neither wind -nor rain, the valley should be filled with water to quench the thirst of -the fainting armies, their horses and their cattle. After this God would -also deliver the Moabites into their hand; and they were bidden to smite -the cities, fell the trees, stop the wells, and mar the smiling -pasture-lands, which constituted the wealth of Moab, with stones. That -the hosts of Judah and Israel and jealous Edom should be prone to -afflict this awfully devastating vengeance on a power by which they had -been so severely defeated on past occasions, and on which they had so -many wrongs and blood-feuds to avenge, was natural; but it is surprising -to find a prophet of the Lord giving the commission to ruin the gifts of -God and spoil the innocent labours of man, and thus to inflict misery on -generations yet unborn. The behest is directly contrary to rules of -international war which have prevailed even between non-Christian -nations, among whom the stopping or poisoning of wells and the cutting -down of fruit trees has been expressly forbidden. It is also against the -rules of war laid down in Deuteronomy.[54] Such, however, was the -command attributed to Elisha; and, as we shall see, it was fulfilled, -and seems to have led to disastrous consequences. - -Cheered by the promise of Divine aid which the prophet had given them, -the host retired to rest. The next morning at day-dawn, when the -_minchah_ of fine flour, oil, and frankincense was offered,[55] water, -which, according to the tradition of Josephus, had fallen at three -days' distance on the hills of Edom, came flowing from the south and -filled the wady with its refreshing streams. - -The incident itself is highly instructive. It throws light both upon -the general accuracy of the ancient narrative, and on the fact that -events to which a directly supernatural colouring is given are, in -many instances, not so much supernatural as providential. The -deliverance of Israel was due, not to a portent wrought by Elisha, but -to the pure wisdom which he derived from the inspiration of God. When -the counsels of princes were of none effect, and for lack of the -spirit of counsel the people were perishing, his mind alone, -illuminated by a wisdom from on high, saw what was the right step to -take. He bade the soldiers dig trenches in the dry torrent bed,--which -was the very step most likely to ensure their deliverance from the -torment of thirst, and which would be done under similar circumstances -to this day. They saw neither wind nor rain; but there had been a -storm among the farther hills, and the swollen watercourses discharged -their overflow into the trenches of the wady which were ready prepared -for them, and offered the path of least resistance. - -Moab, meanwhile, had heard of the advance of the three kings through the -territories of Edom. The whole military population had mustered in arms, -and stood on the frontier, on the other side of the dry wady, to oppose -the invasion. For they knew this would be a struggle of life and death, -and that if defeated they would have no mercy to expect. When the sun -rose, and its first rays burned on the wady, which had been dry on the -previous evening, the water which, unknown to the Moabites, had filled -the trenches in the night, looked red as blood. Doubtless it may have -been stained, as Ewald says, by the red soil which gave its name to the -red land of the "red king, Edom"; but as it gleamed under the dawn the -Moabites thought that those seemingly crimson pools had been filled with -the blood of their enemies, who had fallen by each other's swords. Their -own recent experience when Jehoshaphat met them in the Valley of Salt -showed them how easy it was for temporary allies to be seized by panic, -and to fight among themselves.[56] - -The army of their invaders was composed of heterogeneous and mutually -conflicting elements. Between Israel and Judah there had been nearly a -century of war,[57] and only a brief reunion; and Edom, recently the -willing and natural ally of Moab, was not likely to fight very -zealously for Judah, which had reduced her to vassalage. So the -Moabites said to one another, as they pointed to the unexpected -apparition of those red pools: "This is blood. The kings are surely -destroyed, and they have smitten each man his fellow. Moab to the -spoil!" They rushed down tumultuously on the camp of Israel, and found -the soldiers of Jehoram ready to receive them. Taken by surprise, for -they had expected no resistance, they were hurled back in utter -confusion and with immense slaughter. The three kings pushed their -advantage to the utmost. They went forward into the land, driving and -smiting the Moabites before them, and ruthlessly carrying out the -command attributed to Elisha. They beat down the cities--most of which -in a land of flocks and herds were little more than pastoral villages; -they rendered the green fields useless with stones; they filled up all -the wells with earth; they felled every fruit-bearing tree of any -value. At last only one stronghold, Kir-haraseth, the chief fenced -town of Moab, held out against them.[58] Even this fortress was sore -bested. The slingers, for which Israel, and specially the tribe of -Benjamin, was so famous, advanced to drive its defenders from the -battlements. King Mesha fought with undaunted heroism. He decided to -take the seven hundred warriors who were left to him, and cut his way -through the besieging host to the king of Edom. He thought that even -now he might persuade the Edomites to abandon this new and unnatural -alliance, and turn the battle against their common enemies. But the -numbers against him were too strong, and he found the plan impossible. -Then he formed a dreadful resolution, dictated to him by the extremity -of his despair. His inscription at Karcha shows that he was a profound -and even fanatical believer in Chemosh, his god. Chemosh could still -deliver him. If Chemosh was, as Mesha says in his inscription, "angry -with his land"--if, even for a time, he allowed his faithful people -and his devoted king to be afflicted--it could not be for any lack of -power on his part, but only because they had in some way offended him, -so that he was wroth, or because he had gone on a journey, or was -asleep, or deaf.[59] How could he be appeased? Only by the offering of -the most precious of all the king's possessions; only by the -self-devotion of the crown-prince, on whom were centred all the -nation's hopes. Mesha would force Chemosh to help him for very shame. -He would offer to Chemosh a human sacrifice, the sacrifice of his -eldest son that should have reigned in his stead. Doubtless the young -prince gave himself up as a willing offering, for that was essential -to the holocaust being valid and acceptable.[60] - -So upon the wall of Kir-haraseth, in the sight of all the Moabites, -and of the three invading armies, the brave and desperate hero of a -hundred fights, who had inflicted so many reverses upon these enemies, -and received so many at their hands, but who, having liberated his -country, now saw all the efforts of his life ruined at one blow--took -his eldest son, kindled the sacrificial fire, and then and there -solemnly offered that horrible burnt-offering.[61] - -And it proved effectual, though far otherwise than Mesha had expected. -He was delivered; and, doubtless, if ever he reared, at Kirharaseth or -elsewhere, another memorial stone, he would have attributed his -deliverance to his national god. But here, in the annals of Elisha, -the result is hurried over, and a veil is, so to speak, dropped upon -the dreadful scene with the one ambiguous expression, "And there was -great wrath against Israel: and they departed from him, and returned -to their own land." - -The phrase awakens but does not satisfy our curiosity. We are not -certain of the translation, or of the meaning. It may be, as in the -margin of the Revised Version, "there came great wrath upon -Israel."[62] But wrath from whom? and on what account? The word -"wrath" all but invariably denotes divine wrath; but we cannot imagine -(as some critics do) that any Israelite of the schools of the prophets -would sanction the notion that the chosen people were allowed to -suffer from the kindled wrath of Chemosh. Can we then suppose that the -desperate act of King Mesha was a proof that Israel, who was no doubt -the most interested and the most remorseless of the invaders, had -pressed the Moabites too hard, and carried his vengeance much too far? -That is by no means impossible. The prophet Amos denounces upon Moab -in after years the doom that fire should devour the palaces of -Kirioth, and that Moab should perish with shoutings, and all his royal -line be cut off, for the far less offence of having burned into lime -the bones of the king of Edom.[63] The command of Elisha did not -exempt the Israelites from their share of moral responsibility. Jehu -was commissioned to be an executioner of vengeance upon the house of -Ahab. Yet Jehu is expressly condemned by the prophet Hosea for the -tiger-like ferocity and horrible thoroughness with which he had -carried out his destined work.[64] Only one other explanation is -possible. If "wrath" here has the unusual sense of human indignation, -the clause can only imply that the armies of Judah and Edom were -roused to anger by the unpitying spirit which Israel had displayed. -The horrible tragedy enacted upon the wall of Kirharaseth awoke their -consciences to the sense of human compassion. These, after all, were -fellow-men--fellow-men of kindred blood to their own--whom they had -driven to straits so frightful as to cause a king to burn his own heir -alive as a mute appeal to his god in the hour of overwhelming ruin. -They had done enough: - - "Sunt lacrimae rerum et mentem mortalia tangunt." - -They hastily broke up the league, dissolved the alliance, returned -horror-stricken to their own land. They left Moab indeed in possession -of his last fortress, but they had reduced his territory to a -wilderness before they retired and called it peace. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[43] There are great difficulties in the statement (2 Kings iii. 1) -that he began to reign in the eighteenth year of Jehoshaphat. I have -not entered, nor shall I enter, into the minute and precarious -conjectures necessitated by the uncertainties and contradictions of -this synchronism introduced into the narrative by some editor. Suffice -it that with the aid of the Assyrian records we have certain _points -de repere_; from which we can, with the assistance of the historian, -conjecturally restore the main data. In the dates given at the head of -the chapters I follow Kittel, as a careful inquirer. Some of the -approximately fixed dates are (see Appendix I.):-- - - 854. Battle of Karkar (Ahab and Benhadad against Shalmaneser II.) - 738. Tribute of Menahem to Tiglath-Pileser II. - 732. Fall of Damascus. - 722. Capture of Samaria by Sargon. - 720. Defeat of Sabaco by Sargon in battle of Raphia. - 705. Accession of Sennacherib. - 701. Campaign against Hezekiah. - 608. Death of Josiah. - - -[44] But neither the man of God from Judah nor Amos directly denounce -the calf-worship, so much as its concomitant sins and irregularities. - -[45] Perhaps the true reading is "pillars" (LXX., Vulg., Arab.). - -[46] He is called "a sheep-master," _noked_; LXX., [Greek: noked]. -Elsewhere the word occurs only in Amos i. 1. The Alex. LXX. has -[Greek: en pheron phoron]. - -[47] According to the Moabite Stone. - -[48] It is not clear whether the lambs and rams were sent with the -fleeces. The A.V. says "lambs and rams with their wool," in accordance -with Josephus--[Greek: myriadas eikosi probaton syn tois pokois]. The -LXX. has the vague [Greek: epi pokon], and implies that this was a -special fine after a defeat in the revolt ([Greek: en te -epanastasei]): but comp. Isa. xvi. 1. - -[49] 2 Chron. xx. 1-30. - -[50] Robinson (_Bibl. Res._, ii. 157) identifies it with the brook -_Zered_. Deut. ii. 13; Num. xxi. 12. The name means "valley of -water-pits." W. R. Smith quotes Doughty, _Travels_, i. 26. - -[51] Comp. 1 Kings xxii. 7. The phrase "who poured water on the hands -of Elijah" is a touch of Oriental custom which the traveller in remote -parts of Palestine may still often see. Once, when driven by a storm -into the house of the Sheykh of a tribe which had a rather bad -reputation for brigandage, I was most hospitably entertained; and the -old white-haired Sheykh, his son, and ourselves were waited on by the -grandson, a magnificent youth, who immediately after the meal brought -out an old richly chased ewer and basin, and poured water over our -hands, soiled by eating out of the common dish, of course without -spoons or forks. - -[52] This seems to have struck Josephus (_Antt._, IX. iii. 1), who -says that "he _chanced_ to be in a tent ([Greek: etuche kateskenokos]) -outside the host." - -[53] Comp. 1 Sam. x. 5; 1 Chron. xxv. 1; Ezek. i. 3, xxxiii. 22. -_Menaggen_ is one who plays on a stringed instrument, _n'ginah_. The -Pythagoreans used music in the same way (Cic., _Tusc. Disp._, iv. 2). - -[54] Deut. xx. 19, 20. - -[55] Lev. ii. 1. Comp. 1 Kings xviii. 36. - -[56] This dreadful result crippled the revolt of Vindex against Nero. - -[57] Jeroboam I., B.C. 937; Joram, 854. - -[58] Isa. xv. 1, Kir of Moab; Jer. xlviii. 31, Kir-heres. It is built -on a steep calcareous rock, surrounded by a deep, narrow glen, which -thence descends westward to the Dead Sea, under the name of the Wady -Kerak. We know that the armies of Nineveh habitually practised these -brutal modes of devastation in the districts which they conquered. See -Layard, _passim_; Rawlinson, _Ancient Monarchies_ ii. 84. - -[59] 1 Kings xviii. 27. Comp. Psalm xxxv. 23, xliv. 23, lxxxiii. 1, etc. - -[60] Comp. Micah vi. 7. This is an entirely different incident from -that alluded to in Amos ii. 1. - -[61] Eusebius (_Praep. Evang._, iv. 16) quotes from Philo's Phoenician -history a reference to human sacrifices ([Greek: tois timorois -daimosin]) at moments of desperation. - -[62] The rendering is doubtful. LXX., [Greek: kai egeneto metamelos -megas epi Israel]; Vulg., indignatio _in_ Israel; Luther, _Da ward -Israel sehr zornig_. - -[63] Amos ii. 1-3. - -[64] Hos. i. 4: "I will avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house of -Jehu." - - - - - CHAPTER V - - _ELISHA'S MIRACLES_ - - 2 KINGS iv. 1-44 - - -We are now in the full tide of Elisha's miracles, and as regards many -of them we can do little more than illustrate the text as it stands. -The record of them clearly comes from some account prevalent in the -schools of the prophets, which is however only fragmentary, and has -been unchronologically pieced into the annals of the kings of Israel. - -The story of Elisha abounds far more in the supernatural than that of -Elijah, and is believed by most critics to be of earlier date. Yet the -scenes and portents of his life are almost wholly lacking in the -element of grandeur which belong to those of the elder seer. His -personality, if on the whole softer and more beneficent, inspires less -of awe, and the whole tone of the biography which recorded these -isolated incidents is lacking in the poetic and impassioned elevation -which marks the episodes of Elijah's history. We see in the records of -Elisha, as in the biographies--so rich in prodigies--of fourth-century -hermits and mediaeval saints, how little impressive in itself is the -exercise of abnormal powers; how it derives its sole grandeur from the -accompaniment of great moral lessons and spiritual revelations. John -the Baptist "did no miracle," yet our Lord placed him not only far -above Elisha, but even above Moses and Samuel and Elijah, when He said -of him, "Verily I say unto you, of them that have been born of women -there hath not risen a greater than John the Baptist." - -It is impossible not to be struck with the singular parallelism -between the powers exercised by Elisha and those which are attributed -to his predecessor. "How true an heir is Elisha of his master," says -Bishop Hall, "not in his graces only, but in his actions! Both of them -divided the waters of Jordan, the one as his last act, the other as -his first. Elijah's curse was the death of the captains and their -troops; Elisha's curse was the death of the children. Elijah rebuked -Ahab to his face; Elisha, Jehoram. Elijah supplied the drought of -Israel by rain from heaven; Elisha supplied the drought of the three -kings by waters gushing out of the earth; Elijah increased the oil of -the Sareptan, Elisha increased the oil of the prophet's widow; Elijah -raised from death the Sareptan's son, Elisha the Shunammite's; both of -them had one mantle, one spirit; both of them climbed up one Carmel, -one heaven." The resemblance, however, is not at all in character, but -only in external and miraculous circumstances. In all other respects -Elisha furnishes a contrast to Elijah which startles us quite as much -as any superficial resemblances. Elijah was a free, wild Bedawy -prophet, hating and shunning as his ordinary residence the abodes of -men, making his home in the rocky wady or in the mountain glades, -appearing and disappearing suddenly as the wind. He asserted his power -most often in ministries of retribution. Clad in the sheepskin of a -Gadite shepherd or mountaineer, he was not one of those who wear soft -clothing or are found in kings' houses. He usually met monarchs as -their enemy and their reprover, but for the most part avoided them. He -never intervened for years together even in national events of the -utmost importance, whether military or religious, unless he received -the direct call of God, or there appeared to him to be a "_dignus -Vindice nodus_." Elisha, on the other hand, makes his home in cities, -and chiefly in Samaria. He is familiar with kings and moves about with -armies, and has no long retirements into unknown solitudes; and though -he could speak roughly to Jehoram, he is often on the friendliest -terms with him and with other sovereigns. - -The stories of Elisha give us many interesting glimpses into the -social life of Israel in his day. As to their literal historic -accuracy, those must make positive affirmation who feel that they can -do so in accordance alike with adequate authority and with the -sacredness of truth. Many will be unable to escape the opinion that -they bear some resemblance to other Jewish haggadoth, written for -edification, with every innocent intention, in the schools of the -Prophets, but no more intended for perfectly literal acceptance in all -their details than the Life of St. Paul the Hermit, by St. Jerome; or -that of St. Antony, attributed erroneously to St. Athanasius; or that -of St. Francis in the Fioretti; or the lives of humble saints of the -people called _Kisar-el-anbiah_, which are so popular among poor -Mohammedans. Into that question there is no need to enter further. -_Abundet quisque in sensu suo._ - -I. On one occasion a widow of one of the Sons of the Prophets--for -these communities, though coenobitic, were not celibate--came to him -in deep distress. Her husband--the Jews, with their usual guesswork, -most improbably identify him with Obadiah, the chamberlain of -Ahab[65]--had died insolvent. As she had nothing to pay, her creditor -under the grim provision of the law was about to exercise his right of -selling her two sons into slavery to recoup himself for the debt.[66] -Would Elisha help her? - -Prophets were never men of wealth, so that he could not pay her debt. He -asked her what she possessed to satisfy the demand. "Nothing," she said, -"but a pot of the common oil, used for anointing the body after a bath." - -Elisha bade her go and borrow from her neighbours all the empty -vessels she could, then to return home, shut the door, and pour the -oil into the vessels. - -She did so. They were all filled, and she asked her son to bring yet -another. But there was not another to be had, so she went out and told -the Man of God. He bade her sell the miraculously multiplied oil to -pay the debt, and live with her sons on the proceeds of what was over. - -II. We next find Elisha at Shunem, famous as the abode of the fair -maiden--probably Abishag, the nurse of David's decrepitude--who is the -heroine of the Song of Songs. It is a village, now called Solam, on the -slopes of Little Hermon (Jebel-el-Duhy), three miles north of Jezreel. -At this place there lived a lady of wealth and influence, whose husband -owned the surrounding land. There were but few khans in Palestine, and -even where they now exist the traveller has in most cases to supply his -own food. Elisha, in his journeys to and fro among the schools of the -Prophets, had often enjoyed the welcome hospitality eagerly pressed -upon him by the lady of Shunem. Struck with his sacred character, she -persuaded her husband to take a step unusual even to the boundless -hospitality of the East. She begged him to do honour to this holy Man of -God by building for him a little chamber (_aliyah_) on the flat roof of -the house, to which he might have easy and private access by the outside -staircase.[67] The chamber was built, and furnished, like any other -simple Eastern room, with a bed, a divan to sit on, a table, and a lamp; -and there the weary prophet on his journeys often found a peaceful, -simple, and delightful resting-place. - -Grateful for the reverence with which she treated him, and the kind -care with which she had supplied his needs, Elisha was anxious to -recompense her in whatever way might be possible. The thought of money -payment was of course out of the question: merely to hint at it would -have been a breach of manners. But perhaps he might be of use to her -in some other way. At this time, and for years afterwards during his -long ministry of perhaps fifty-six years, he was attended by a servant -named Gehazi, who stood to him in the same sort of relation which he -had held to Elijah. He told Gehazi to summon the Shunammite lady. In -the deep humility of Eastern womanhood she came and stood in his -presence. Even then he did not address her. So downtrodden was the -position of women in the East that any dignified person, much more a -great prophet, could not converse with a woman without compromising -his dignity. The more scrupulous Pharisees in the days of Christ -always carefully gathered up their garments in the streets, lest they -should so much as touch a woman with their skirts in passing by, as -the modern Chakams in Jerusalem do to this day.[68] The disciples -themselves, sophisticated by familiarity with such teachers, were -astonished that Jesus at the well of Shechem should talk with a -woman.[69] So, though the lady stood there, Elisha, instead of -speaking to her directly, told Gehazi to thank her for all the devout -respect and care, all 'the modesty of fearful duty,'[70] which she had -displayed towards them, and to ask her if he should say a good word -for her to the King or the Captain of the Host. This is just the sort -of favour which an Eastern would be likely to value most.[71] The -Shunammite, however, was well provided for; she had nothing to -complain of, and nothing to request. She thanked Elisha for his kindly -proposal, but declined it, and went away. - -"Is there, then, nothing which we can do for her?" asked Elisha of -Gehazi.[72] - -There was. Gehazi had learnt that the sorrow of her life--a sorrow and -a source of reproach to any Eastern household, but most of all to that -of a wealthy householder--was her childlessness. - -"Call her," he said. - -She came back, and stood reverently in the doorway. "When the time -comes round," he said to her, "you shall embrace a son." - -The promise raised in her heart a thrill of joy. It was too precious -to be believed. "Nay," she said "my lord, thou Man of God, do not lie -unto thine handmaid." - -But the promise was fulfilled, and the lady of Shunem became the happy -mother of a son. - -III. The charming episode then passes over some years. The child had -grown into a little boy, old enough now to go out alone to see his -father in the harvest fields and to run about among the reapers. But as -he played about in the heat he had a sunstroke, and cried to his father, -"O my head, my head!" Not knowing how serious the matter was, his father -simply ordered one of his lads to carry the child home to his mother. -The fond mother nursed him tenderly upon her knees, but at noon he died. - -Then the lady of Shunem showed all the faith and strength and wisdom of -her character. "The good Shunammite," says Bishop Hall, "had lost her -son; her faith she lost not." Overwhelming as was this calamity--the -loss of an only child--she suppressed all her emotions, and, instead of -bursting into the wild helpless wail of Eastern mourners, or rushing to -her husband with the agonising news, she took the little boy's body in -her arms, carried it up to the chamber which had been built for Elisha, -and laid it upon his bed. Then, shutting the door, she called to her -husband to send to her one of his reapers and one of the asses, for she -was going quickly to the Man of God and would return in the cool of the -evening. "Why should you go to-day particularly?" he asked. "It is -neither new moon, nor sabbath." "It is all right," she said;[73] and -with perfect confidence in the rectitude of all her purposes, he sent -her the she-ass, and a servant to drive it and to run beside it for her -protection on the journey of sixteen miles. - -"Drive on the ass," she said. "Slacken me not the riding unless I tell -you." So with all possible speed she made her way--a journey of -several hours--from Shunem to Mount Carmel. - -Elisha, from his retreat on the hill, marked her coming from a -distance, and it rendered him anxious. "Here comes the Shunammite," he -said to Gehazi. "Run to meet her, and ask Is it well with thee? is it -well with thy husband? is it well with the child?" - -"All well," she answered, for her message was not to Gehazi, and she -could not trust her voice to speak; but pressing on up-hillwards, she -flung herself before Elisha and grasped his feet. Displeased at the -familiarity which dared thus to clasp the feet of his master, Gehazi ran -up to thrust her away by force, but Elisha interfered. "Let her alone," -he cried; "she is in deep affliction, and Jehovah has not revealed to me -the cause." Then her long pent-up emotion burst forth. "Did I desire a -son of my lord?" she cried. "Did I not say do not deceive me?" - -It was enough--though she seemed unable to bring out the dreadful -words that her boy was dead. Catching her meaning, Elisha said to -Gehazi, "Gird up thy loins, take my staff, and without so much as -stopping to salute any one, or to return a salutation,[74] lay my -staff on the dead child's face." But the broken-hearted mother -refused to leave Elisha. She imagined that the servant, the staff, -might be severed from Elisha; but she knew that wherever the prophet -was, there was power. So Elisha arose and followed her, and on the way -Gehazi met them with the news that the child lay still and dead, with -the fruitless staff upon his face. - -Then Elisha in deep anguish went up to the chamber and shut the door, -and saw the boy's body lying pale upon his bed. After earnest prayer -he outstretched himself over the little corpse, as Elijah had done at -Zarephath. Soon it began to grow warm with returning life, and Elisha, -after pacing up and down the room, once more stretched himself over -him. Then the child opened his eyes and sneezed seven times, and -Elisha called to Gehazi to summon the mother. - -"Take up thy son," he said. She prostrated herself at his feet in -speechless gratitude, and took up her recovered child, and went. - -IV. We next find Elisha at Gilgal, in the time of the famine of which -we read his prediction in a later chapter.[75] The sons of the -prophets were seated round him, listening to his instructions; the -hour came for their simple meal, and he ordered the great pot to be -put on the fire for the vegetable soup, on which, with bread, they -chiefly lived. One of them went out for herbs, and carelessly brought -his outer garment (the _abeyah_)[76] full of wild poisonous -coloquinths,[77] which, by ignorance or inadvertence, were shred into -the pottage. But when it was cooked and poured out they perceived the -poisonous taste, and cried out, "O Man of God, death in the pot!" - -"Bring meal," he said, for he seems always to have been a man of the -fewest words. - -They cast in some meal, and were all able to eat of the now harmless -pottage. It has been noticed that in this, as in other incidents of -the story, there is no invocation of the name of Jehovah. - -V. Not far from Gilgal was the little village of Baalshalisha,[78] at -which lived a farmer who wished to bring an offering of firstfruits -and _karmel_ (bruised grain) in his wallet to Elisha as a Man of -God.[79] It was a poor gift enough--only twenty of the coarse barley -loaves which were eaten by the common people, and a sack[80] full of -fresh ears of corn.[81] Elisha told his servitor[82]--perhaps -Gehazi--to set them before the people present. "What?" he asked, "this -trifle of food before a hundred men!" But Elisha told him in the -Lord's name that it should more than suffice; and so it did. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[65] Jos., _Antt._, IX. iv. 2. This perhaps is only suggested by the -reminiscences of 1 Kings xviii. 2, 3, 12. - -[66] Lev. xxv. 39-41; Matt. xviii. 25. - -[67] 2 Kings iv. 10. Not "a little chamber on the wall" (A.V.), but -"an _aliyah_ with walls" (margin, R.V.). - -[68] Frankl., _Jews in the East_. - -[69] John iv. 27: "Then came His disciples, and marvelled that He was -_talking_ ([Greek: meta gunaikos]) _with a woman_." - -[70] 2 Kings iv. 13: "Behold, thou hast been careful for us with all -this care" (LXX., [Greek: pasan ten ekstasin tauten]). - -[71] The Sheykh with whom I stayed at Bint es Jebeil could think of no -return which I could offer for his hospitality so acceptable as if I -would say a good word for him to the authorities at Beyrout. - -[72] Gehazi is usually called the _na'ar_ or "lad" of Elisha--a term -implying lower service than Elisha's "ministry" to Elijah. - -[73] 2 Kings iv. 23. Hebrew "Peace"; A.V., "It shall be well." - -[74] Salutations occupy some time in the formally courteous East. -Comp. Luke x. 4. - -[75] 2 Kings viii. 1. - -[76] Not "lap," as in A. V. (Heb., _beged_); LXX. [Greek: synelixe -pleres to himation autou]; Vulg., _implevit vestem suam_ (both -correctly). - -[77] Heb., _paquoth_; LXX., [Greek: tolypen agrian]; Vulg; -_colocynthidas agri_. Hence the name _cucumis prophetarum_. - -[78] Lord of the Chain and "Three lands." Three wadies meet at this -spot, a little west of Bethel. - -[79] 2 Kings iv. 42. Karmel, Lev. ii. 14. Perhaps a sort of frumenty. - -[80] The word for "wallet" (_tsiqlon_; Vulg., _pera_) occurs here -only. Peshito, "garment." The Vatican LXX. omits it. The Greek version -has [Greek: en koryko autou]. - -[81] See Lev. ii. 14, xxiii. 14. - -[82] 2 Kings iv. 43. The word for "his servitor" (_m'chartho_) is used -also of Joshua. It does not mean a mere ordinary attendant. LXX., -[Greek: leitourgos]; Vulg., _minister_. - - - - - CHAPTER VI - - _THE STORY OF NAAMAN_ - - 2 KINGS v. 1-27 - - MATT. viii. 3: [Greek: Thelo, katharistheti] - - -After these shorter anecdotes we have the longer episode of Naaman.[83] - -A part of the misery inflicted by the Syrians on Israel was caused by -the forays in which their light-armed bands, very much like the -borderers on the marches of Wales or Scotland, descended upon the -country and carried off plunder and captives before they could be -pursued. - -In one of these raids they had seized a little Israelitish girl and -sold her to be a slave. She had been purchased for the household of -Naaman, the captain of the Syrian host, who had helped his king and -nation to win important victories either against Israel or against -Assyria. Ancient Jewish tradition identified him with the man who had -"drawn his bow at a venture" and slain King Ahab. But all Naaman's -valour and rank and fame, and the honour felt for him by his king, -were valueless to him, for he was suffering from the horrible -affliction of leprosy. Lepers do not seem to have been segregated in -other countries so strictly as they were in Israel, or at any rate -Naaman's leprosy was not of so severe a form as to incapacitate him -from his public functions. - -But it was evident that he was a man who had won the affection of all -who knew him; and the little slave girl who waited on his wife -breathed to her a passionate wish that Naaman could visit the Man of -God in Samaria, for he would recover him from his leprosy. The saying -was repeated, and one of Naaman's friends mentioned it to the king of -Syria. Benhadad was so much struck by it that he instantly determined -to send a letter, with a truly royal gift to the king of Israel, who -could, he supposed, as a matter of course, command the services of the -prophet. The letter came to Jehoram with a stupendous present of -ingots of silver to the value of ten talents, and six thousand pieces -of gold, and ten changes of raiment.[84] After the ordinary -salutations, and a mention of the gifts, the letter continued "And -now, when this letter is come to thee, behold I have sent Naaman my -servant, that thou mayest recover him of his leprosy." - -Jehoram lived in perpetual terror of his powerful and encroaching -neighbour. Nothing was said in the letter about the Man of God; and -the king rent his clothes, exclaiming that he was not God to kill and -to make alive, and that this must be a base pretext for a quarrel. It -never so much as occurred to him, as it certainly would have done to -Jehoshaphat, that the prophet, who was so widely known and honoured, -and whose mission had been so clearly attested in the invasion of -Moab, might at least help him to face this problem. Otherwise the -difficulty might indeed seem insuperable, for leprosy was universally -regarded as an incurable disease. - -But Elisha was not afraid: he boldly told Jehoram to send the Syrian -captain to him. Naaman, with his horses and his chariots, in all the -splendour of a royal ambassador, drove up to the humble house of the -prophet. Being so great a man, he expected a deferential reception, -and looked for the performance of his cure in some striking and -dramatic manner. "The prophet," so he said to himself, "will come out, -and solemnly invoke the name of his God Jehovah, and wave his hand -over the leprous limbs, and so work the miracle."[85] - -But the servant of the King of kings was not exultantly impressed, as -false prophets so often are, by earthly greatness. Elisha did not even -pay him the compliment of coming out of the house to meet him. He -wished to efface himself completely, and to fix the leper's thoughts -on the one truth that if healing was granted to him, it was due to the -gift of God, not to the thaumaturgy or arts of man. He simply sent out -his servant to the Syrian commander-in-chief with the brief message, -"Go and wash in Jordan seven times, and be thou clean." - -Naaman, accustomed to the extreme deference of many dependants, was not -only offended, but enraged, by what he regarded as the scant courtesy -and procrastinated boon of the prophet. Why was he not received as a man -of the highest distinction? What necessity could there be for sending -him all the way to the Jordan? And why was he bidden to wash in that -wretched, useless, tortuous stream, rather than in the pure and flowing -waters of his own native Abanah and Pharpar?[86] How was he to tell that -this "Man of God" did not design to mock him by sending him on a fool's -errand, so that he would come back as a laughing-stock both to the -Israelites and to his own people? Perhaps he had not felt any great -faith in the prophet, to begin with; but whatever he once felt had now -vanished. He turned and went away in a rage. - -But in this crisis the affection of his friends and servants stood him -in good stead. Addressing him, in their love and pity, by the unusual -term of honour "my father," they urged upon him that, as he certainly -would not have refused some _great_ test, there was no reason why he -should refuse this simple and humble one. - -He was won over by their reasonings, and descending the hot steep valley -of the Jordan, bathed himself in the river seven times. God healed him, -and, as Elisha had promised, "his flesh," corroded by leprosy, "came -again like the flesh of a little child, and he was clean." - -This healing of Naaman is alluded to by our Lord to illustrate the truth -that the love of God extended farther than the limits of the chosen -race; that His Fatherhood is co-extensive with the whole family of man. - -It is difficult to conceive the transport of a man cured of this most -loathsome and humiliating of all earthly afflictions. Naaman, who seems -to have possessed "a mind naturally Christian," was filled with -gratitude. Unlike the thankless Jewish lepers whom Christ cured as He -left Engannim, this alien returned to give glory to God. Once more the -whole imposing cavalcade rode through the streets of Samaria, and -stopped at Elisha's door. This time Naaman was admitted into his -presence. He saw, and no doubt Elisha had strongly impressed on him the -truth, that his healing was the work not of man but of God; and as he -had found no help in the deities of Syria, he confessed that the God of -Israel was the only true God among those of the nations. In token of his -thankfulness he presses Elisha, as God's instrument in the unspeakable -mercy which has been granted to him, to accept "a blessing" (_i.e._, a -present) from him--"from thy servant," as he humbly styled himself. - -Elisha was no greedy Balaam. It was essential that Naaman and the -Syrians should not look on him as on some vulgar sorcerer who wrought -wonders for "the rewards of divination." His wants were so simple that -he stood above temptation. His desires and treasures were not on -earth. To put an end to all importunity, he appealed to Jehovah with -his usual solemn formula--"As the Lord liveth before whom I stand, I -will receive no present."[87] - -Still more deeply impressed by the prophet's incorruptible superiority -to so much as a suspicion of low motives, Naaman asked that he might -receive two mules' burden of earth wherewith to build an altar to the -God of Israel of His own sacred soil.[88] The very soil ruled by such -a God must, he thought, be holier than other soil; and he wished to -take it back to Syria, just as the people of Pisa rejoiced to fill -their Campo Santo with mould from the Holy Land, and just as mothers -like to baptize their children in water brought home from the Jordan. -Henceforth, said Naaman, I will offer burnt-offering and sacrifice to -no God but unto Jehovah. Yet there was one difficulty in the way. When -the King of Syria went to worship in the temple of his god Rimmon it -was the duty of Naaman to accompany him.[89] The king leaned on his -hand, and when he bowed before the idol it was Naaman's duty to bow -also. He begged that for this concession God would pardon him. - -Elisha's answer was perhaps different from what Elijah might have given. -He practically allowed Naaman to give this sign of outward compliance -with idolatry, by saying to him, "Go in peace." It is from this -circumstance that the phrase "to bow in the house of Rimmon" has become -proverbial to indicate a dangerous and dishonest compromise. But -Elisha's permission must not be misunderstood. He did but hand over this -semi-heathen convert to the grace of God. It must be remembered that he -lived in days long preceding the conviction that proselytism is a part -of true religion; in days when the thought of missions to heathen lands -was utterly unknown. The position of Naaman was wholly different from -that of any Israelite. He was only the convert, or the half-convert of -a day, and though he acknowledged the supremacy of Jehovah as alone -worthy of his worship, he probably shared in the belief--common even in -Israel--that there were other gods, local gods, gods of the nations, to -whom Jehovah might have divided the limits of their power.[90] To demand -of one who, like Naaman, had been an idolater all his days, the sudden -abandonment of every custom and tradition of his life, would have been -to demand from him an unreasonable, and, in his circumstances, useless -and all but impossible self-sacrifice. The best way was to let him feel -and see for himself the futility of Rimmon-worship. If he were not -frightened back from his sudden faith in Jehovah, the scruple of -conscience which he already felt in making his request might naturally -grow within him and lead him to all that was best and highest. The -temporary condonation of an imperfection might be a wise step towards -the ultimate realisation of a truth. We cannot at all blame Elisha, if, -with such knowledge as he then possessed, he took a mercifully tolerant -view of the exigencies of Naaman's position. The bowing in the house of -Rimmon under such conditions probably seemed to him no more than an act -of outward respect to the king and to the national religion in a case -where no evil results could follow from Naaman's example.[91] - -But the general principle that _we_ must _not_ bow in the house of -Rimmon remains unchanged. The light and knowledge vouchsafed to us far -transcend those which existed in times when men had not seen the days of -the Son of Man. The only rule which sincere Christians can follow is to -have no truce with Canaan, no halting between two opinions, no -tampering, no compliance, no connivance, no complicity with evil,--even -no tolerance of evil as far as their own conduct is concerned. No good -man, in the light of the Gospel dispensation, could condone himself in -seeming to sanction--still less in doing--anything which in his opinion -ought not to be done, or in saying anything which implied his own -acquiescence in things which he knows to be evil. "Sir," said a -parishioner to one of the non-juring clergy: "there is many a man who -has made a great gash in his conscience; cannot you make a little nick -in yours?" No! a _little_ nick is, in one sense, as fatal as a great -gash. It is an abandonment of _the principle_; it is a violation of the -Law. The wrong of it consists in this--that all evil begins, not in the -commission of great crimes, but in the slight divergence from right -rules. The angle made by two lines may be infinitesimally small, but -produce the lines and it may require infinitude to span the separation -between the lines which inclose so tiny an angle. The wise man gave the -only true rule about wrong-doing, when he said, "Enter not into the path -of the wicked and go not in the way of evil men. Avoid it, pass not by -it, turn from it and pass away."[92] And the reason for his rule is -that the beginning of sin--like the beginning of strife--"is as when one -letteth out water."[93] - -The proper answer to all abuses of any supposed concession to the -lawfulness of bowing in the house of Rimmon--if that be interpreted to -mean the doing of anything which our consciences cannot wholly -approve--is _Obsta principiis_--avoid the beginnings of evil. - - "We are not worst at once; the course of evil - Begins so slowly, and from such slight source, - An infant's hand might stem the breach with clay; - But let the stream grow wider, and philosophy, - Age, and religion too, may strive in vain - To stem the headstrong current." - -The mean cupidity of Gehazi, the servant of Elisha, gives a deplorable -sequel to the story of the prophet's magnanimity. This man's wretched -greed did its utmost to nullify the good influence of his master's -example. There may be more wicked acts recorded in Scripture than that -of Gehazi, but there is scarcely one which shows so paltry a -disposition. - -He had heard the conversation between his master and the Syrian -marshal, and his cunning heart despised as a futile sentimentality the -magnanimity which had refused an eagerly proffered reward. Naaman was -rich: he had received a priceless boon; it would be rather a pleasure -to him than otherwise to return for it some acknowledgment which he -would not miss. Had he not even seemed a little hurt by Elisha's -refusal to receive it? What possible harm could there be in taking -what he was anxious to give? And how useful those magnificent presents -would be, and to what excellent uses could they be put! He could not -approve of the fantastic and unpractical scrupulosity which had led -Elisha to refuse the "blessing" which he had so richly earned. Such -attitudes of unworldliness seemed entirely foolish to Gehazi. - -So pleaded the Judas-spirit within the man. By such specious delusions -he inflamed his own covetousness, and fostered the evil temptation -which had taken sudden and powerful hold upon his heart, until it took -shape in a wicked resolve. - -The mischief of Elisha's quixotic refusal was done, but it could be -speedily undone, and no one would be the worse. The evil spirit was -whispering to Gehazi:-- - - "Be mine and Sin's for one short hour; and then - Be all thy life the happiest man of men." - -"Behold," he said, with some contempt both for Elisha and for Naaman, -"my master hath let off this Naaman the Syrian; but as the Lord liveth -I will run after him, and take somewhat of him." - -"As the Lord liveth!" It had been a favourite appeal of Elijah and -Elisha, and the use of it by Gehazi shows how utterly meaningless and -how very dangerous such solemn words become when they are degraded -into formulae.[94] It is thus that the habit of swearing begins. The -light use of holy words very soon leads to their utter degradation. -How keen is the satire in Cowper's little story:-- - - "A Persian, humble servant of the sun, - Who, though devout, yet bigotry had none, - Hearing a lawyer, grave in his address, - With adjurations every word impress,-- - Supposed the man a bishop, or, at least, - God's Name so often on his lips--a priest. - Bowed at the close with all his gracious airs, - And begged an interest in his frequent prayers!" - - -Had Gehazi felt their true meaning--had he realised that on Elisha's -lips they meant something infinitely more real than on his own, he -would not have forgotten that in Elisha's answer to Naaman they had -all the validity of an oath, and that he was inflicting on his master -a shameful wrong, when he led Naaman to believe that, after so sacred -an adjuration, the prophet had frivolously changed his mind. - -Gehazi had not very far to run,[95] for in a country full of hills, -and of which the roads are rough, horses and chariots advance but -slowly. Naaman, chancing to glance backwards, saw the prophet's -attendant running after him. Anticipating that he must be the bearer -of some message from Elisha, he not only halted the cavalcade, but -sprang down from his chariot,[96] and went to meet him with the -anxious question, "Is all well?" - -"Well," answered Gehazi; and then had ready his cunning lie. "Two -youths," he said, "of the prophetic schools had just unexpectedly come -to his master from the hill country of Ephraim; and though he would -accept nothing for himself, Elisha would be glad if Naaman would spare -him two changes of garments, and one talent of silver for these poor -members of a sacred calling."[97] - -Naaman must have been a little more or a little less than human if he -did not feel a touch of disappointment on hearing this message. The gift -was nothing to him. It was a delight to him to give it, if only to -lighten a little the burden of gratitude which he felt towards his -benefactor. But if he had felt elevated by the magnanimous example of -Elisha's disinterestedness, he must have thought that this hasty request -pointed to a little regret on the prophet's part for his noble -self-denial. After all, then, even prophets were but men, and gold after -all was gold! The change of mind about the gift brought Elisha a little -nearer the ordinary level of humanity, and, so far, it acted as a sort -of disenchantment from the high ideal exhibited by his former refusal. -And so Naaman said, with alacrity, "Be content: take two talents." - -The fact that Gehazi's conduct thus inevitably compromised his master, -and undid the effects of his example, is part of the measure of the -man's apostacy. It showed how false and hypocritical was his position, -how unworthy he was to be the ministering servant of a prophet. Elisha -was evidently deceived in the man altogether. The heinousness of his -guilt lies in the words _Corruptio optimi pessima_. When religion is -used for a cloak of covetousness, of usurping ambition, of secret -immorality, it becomes deadlier than infidelity. Men raze the -sanctuary, and build their idol temples on the hallowed ground. They -cover their base encroachments and impure designs with the "cloke of -profession, doubly lined with the fox-fur of hypocrisy," and hide the -leprosy which is breaking out upon their foreheads with the golden -_petalon_ on which is inscribed the title of "holiness to the Lord." - -At first Gehazi did not like to take so large a sum as two talents; -but the crime was already committed, and there was not much more harm -done in taking two talents than in taking one. Naaman urged him, and -it is very improbable that, unless the chances of detection weighed -with him, he needed much urging. So the Syrian weighed out silver -ingots to the amount of two talents, and putting them in two satchels -laid them on two of his servants and told them to carry the money -before Gehazi to Elisha's house. But Gehazi had to keep a look-out -lest his nefarious dealings should be observed, and when they came to -Ophel--the word means the foot of the hill of Samaria, or some part of -the fortifications[98]--he took the bags from the two Syrians, -dismissed them, and carried the money to some place where he could -conceal it in the house. Then, as though nothing had happened, with -his usual smooth face of sanctimonious integrity, the pious Jesuit -went and stood before his master. - -He had not been unnoticed! His heart must have sunk within him when -there smote upon his ear Elisha's question,-- - -"Whence comest thou, Gehazi?" - -But one lie is as easy as another, and Gehazi was doubtless an adept -at lying. - -"Thy servant went no whither," he replied, with an air of innocent -surprise. - -"_Went not_ my beloved one?"[99] said Elisha--and he must have said it -with a groan, as he thought how utterly unworthy the youth, whom he -thus called "my loving heart" or "my dear friend,"--"when the man -turned from his chariot to meet thee?" It may be that from the hill -of Samaria Elisha had seen it all, or that he had been told by one who -had seen it. If not, he had been rightly led to read the secret of his -servant's guilt. "Is it a time," he asked, "to act thus?" Did not my -example show thee that there was a high object in refusing this -Syrian's gifts, and in leading him to feel that the servants of -Jehovah do His bidding with no afterthought of sordid considerations? -Are there not enough troubles about us actual and impending, to show -that this is no time for the accumulation of earthly treasures? Is it -a time to receive money--and all that money will procure? to receive -garments, and olive-yards and vineyards, and oxen, and men-servants -and maid-servants? Has a prophet no higher aim than the accumulation -of earthly goods, and are his needs such as earthly goods can supply? -And hast thou, the daily friend and attendant of a prophet, learnt so -little from his precepts and his example? - -Then followed the tremendous penalty for so grievous a -transgression--a transgression made up of meanness, irreverence, -greed, cheating, treachery, and lies. - -"The leprosy therefore of Naaman shall cleave unto thee, and unto thy -seed for ever!" "Oh heavy talents of Gehazi!" exclaims Bishop Hall: -"Oh the horror of the one unchangeable suit! How much better had been -a light purse and a homely coat, with a sound body and a clean soul!" - -"And he went out from his presence a leper as white as snow."[100] - -It is the characteristic of the leprous taint in the system to be thus -suddenly developed, and apparently in crises of sudden and -overpowering emotion it might affect the whole blood. And one of the -many morals which lie in Gehazi's story is again that moral to which -the world's whole experience sets its seal--that though the guilty -soul may sell itself for a desired price, the sum-total of that price -is nought. It is Achan's ingots buried under the sod on which stood -his tent. It is Naboth's vineyard made abhorrent to Ahab on the day he -entered it. It is the thirty pieces of silver which Judas dashed with -a shriek upon the Temple floor. It is Gehazi's leprosy for which no -silver talents or changes of raiment could atone. - -The story of Gehazi--of the son of the prophets who would naturally -have succeeded Elisha as Elisha had succeeded Elijah--must have had a -tremendous significance to warn the members of the prophetic schools -from the peril of covetousness. That peril, as all history proves to -us, is one from which popes and priests, monks, and even nominally -ascetic and nominally pauper communities, have never been exempt;--to -which, it may even be said, that they have been peculiarly liable. -Mercenariness and falsity, displayed under the pretence of religion, -were never more overwhelmingly rebuked. Yet, as the Rabbis said, it -would have been better if Elisha, in repelling with the left hand, had -also drawn with the right.[101] - - * * * * * - -The fine story of Elisha and Naaman, and the fall and punishment of -Gehazi, is followed by one of the anecdotes of the prophet's life -which appears to our unsophisticated, perhaps to our imperfectly -enlightened judgment, to rise but little above the ecclesiastical -portents related in mediaeval hagiologies. - -At some unnamed place--perhaps Jericho--the house of the Sons of the -Prophets had become too small for their numbers and requirements, and -they asked Elisha's leave to go down to the Jordan and cut beams to make -a new residence. Elisha gave them leave, and at their request consented -to go with them. While they were hewing, the axe-head of one of them -fell into the water, and he cried out, "Alas! master, it was borrowed!" -Elisha ascertained where it had fallen. He then cut down a stick,[102] -and cast it on the spot, and the iron swam and the man recovered it. - -The story is perhaps an imaginative reproduction of some unwonted -incident. At any rate, we have no sufficient evidence to prove that it -may not be so. It is wholly unlike the economy invariably shown in the -Scripture narratives which tell us of the exercise of supernatural -power. All the eternal laws of nature are here superseded at a word, as -though it were an every-day matter, without even any recorded invocation -of Jehovah, to restore an axe-head, which could obviously have been -recovered or resupplied in some much less stupendous way than by making -iron swim on the surface of a swift-flowing river. It is easy to invent -conventional and _a priori_ apologies to show that religion demands the -unquestioning acceptance of this prodigy, and that a man must be -shockingly wicked who does not feel certain that it happened exactly in -the literal sense; but whether the doubt or the defence be morally -worthier, is a thing which God alone can judge.[103] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[83] It is curiously omitted by Josephus, though he mentions him -([Greek: Amanos]) as the slayer of Ahab (_Antt._, VIII. xv. 5). The -name is an old Hebrew name (Num. xxvi. 40). - -[84] The word _l'boosh_ means a gala dress. Comp. v. 5; Gen. xlv. 22. -[Greek: chitones epemoiboi] (Hom., _Od._, xiv. 514). Comp. viii. 249. - -[85] Elisha would not be likely to _touch_ the place. - -[86] Now the _Burada_ ("cold") and the Nahr-el-Awaj. - -[87] Compare the answer of Abraham to the King of Sodom (Gen. xiv. 23). - -[88] The feeling which influenced Naaman is the same which led the Jews -to build Nahardea in Persia of stones from Jerusalem. Altars were to be -of earth (Exod. xx. 24), but no altar is mentioned in 2 Kings v. 17, and -the LXX. does not even specify _earth_ ([Greek: gomos zeugos hemionon]). - -[89] This is the only place in Scripture where Rimmon is mentioned, -though we have the name Tab-Rimmon ("Rimmon is good"), 1 Kings xv. 18, -and Hadad-Rimmon (Zech. xii. 11). He was the god of the thunder. The -word means "pomegranate," and some have fancied that this was one of -his symbols. But the resemblance may be accidental, and the name was -properly _Ramman_. - -[90] See Deut. xxxii. 8, where the LXX. has [Greek: kata arithmon -angelon]. - -[91] The moral difficulty must have been early felt, for the -Alexandrian LXX. reads [Greek: kai proskyneso ama auto ego Kurio to -Theo mou]. But he would still be bowing in the House of Rimmon, though -he might in his heart worship God. "Elisha, like Elijah" (says Dean -Stanley), "made no effort to set right what had gone so wrong. Their -mission was to make the best of what they found; not to bring back a -rule of religion which had passed away, but to dwell on the Moral Law -which could be fulfilled everywhere, not on the Ceremonial Law which -circumstances seemed to have put out of their reach: 'not sending the -Shunammite to Jerusalem' (says Cardinal Newman), 'not eager for a -proselyte in Naaman, yet making the heathen fear the Name of God, and -proving to them that there was a prophet in Israel'" (Stanley, -_Lectures_, ii. 377; Newman, _Sermons_, viii. 415). - -[92] Prov. iv. 14, 15. - -[93] Prov. xvii. 14. - -[94] On Gehazi's lips it meant no more than the incessant _Wallah_, -"by God," of Mohammedans. - -[95] 2 Kings v. 19. Heb., _kib'rath aretz_, "a little way"--literally, -"a space of country." (The Vatican LXX. follows another reading, -[Greek: eis Debratha tes ges]; Vulg., _electo terrae tempore_[?].) - -[96] LXX., [Greek: katepedesen]. - -[97] A talent of silver was worth about L400--an enormous sum for two -half-naked youths. - -[98] 2 Kings v. 24. The LXX. ([Greek: eis to skoteinon]) seems to have -read [Hebrew: 'ofel] (_ophel_); "darkness," a treasury or secret -place, for [Hebrew: tzofel], and so the Vulgate _jam vesperi_. - -[99] 2 Kings v. 26. The verse is so interpreted by some critics, -especially Ewald, followed by Stanley. Margin, R.V.: "Mine heart went -not from me, when" etc. - -[100] Exod. iv. 6; Num. xii. 10. - -[101] The later Rabbis thought that Elisha was too severe with Gehazi, -and was punished with sickness because "he repelled him with both his -hands" (_Bava-Metsia_, f. 87, 1, and _Yalkut Jeremiah_). - -[102] The Hebrew word for "cut off" (_qatsab_) is very rare. LXX., -[Greek: apeknise xylon]; Vulg., _praecidit lignum_. - -[103] It must be further borne in mind that "the iron did swim" (A.V.) -is less accurate than "made the iron to swim" (R.V.). The LXX. has -[Greek: epepolase], "brought to the surface." Von Gerlach says, "He -thrust the stick into the water, and raised the iron to the surface." - - - - - CHAPTER VII - - _ELISHA AND THE SYRIANS_ - - 2 KINGS vi. 1-23 - - "Now there was found in the city a poor wise man, and he by his - wisdom delivered the city."--ECCLES. ix. 15. - - -Elisha, unlike his master Elijah, was, during a great part of his long -career, intimately mixed up with the political and military fortunes -of his country. The king of Israel who occurs in the following -narratives is left nameless--always the sign of later and more vague -tradition; but he has usually been identified with Jehoram ben-Ahab, -and, though not without some misgivings, we shall assume that the -identification is correct. His dealings with Elisha never seem to have -been very cordial, though on one occasion he calls him "my father." -The relations between them at times became strained and even stormy. - -His reign was rendered miserable by the incessant infestation of Syrian -marauders. In these difficulties he was greatly helped by Elisha. The -prophet repeatedly frustrated the designs of the Syrian king by -revealing to Jehoram the places of Benhadad's ambuscades, so that -Jehoram could change the destination of his hunting parties or other -movements, and escape the plots laid to seize his person. Benhadad, -finding himself thus frustrated, and suspecting that it was due to -treachery, called his servants together in grief and indignation, and -asked who was the traitor among them. His officers assured him that they -were all faithful, but that the secrets whispered in his bed-chamber -were revealed to Jehoram by Elisha the prophet in Israel, whose fame had -spread into Syria, perhaps because of the cure of Naaman. The king, -unable to take any step while his counsels were thus published to his -enemies, thought--not very consistently--that he could surprise and -seize Elisha himself, and sent to find out where he was. At that time he -was living in Dothan, about twelve miles north-east of Samaria,[104] and -Benhadad sent a contingent with horses and chariots by night to surround -the city, and prevent any escape from its gates. That he could thus -besiege a town so near the capital shows the helplessness to which -Israel had been now reduced. - -When Elisha's servitor rose in the morning he was terrified to see the -Syrians encamped round the city, and cried to Elisha, "Alas! my -master, what shall we do?" - -"Fear not," said the prophet: "they that be with us are more than they -that be with them." He prayed God to grant the youth the same open eyes, -the same spiritual vision which he himself enjoyed; and the youth saw -the mountain full of horses and chariots of fire round about Elisha. - -This incident has been full of comfort to millions, as a beautiful -illustration of the truth that-- - - "The hosts of God encamp around - The dwellings of the just; - Deliverance He affords to all - Who on His promise trust. - - "Oh, make but trial of His love, - Experience will decide, - How blest are they, and only they, - Who in His truth confide." - -The youth's affectionate alarm had not been shared by his master. He -knew that to every true servant of God the promise will be fulfilled, -"He shall defend thee under His wings; thou shalt be safe under His -feathers; His righteousness and truth shall be thy shield and -buckler."[105] - -Were our eyes similarly opened, we too should see the reality of the -Divine protection and providence, whether under the visible form of -angelic ministrants or not. Scripture in general, and the Psalms in -particular, are full of the serenity inspired by this conviction. The -story of Elisha is a picture-commentary on the Psalmist's words: "The -angel of the Lord encampeth round them that fear Him, and delivereth -them."[106] "He shall give His angels charge over thee, to keep thee -in all thy ways."[107] "And I will encamp about Mine house because of -the army, because of him that passeth by, and because of him that -returneth: and no oppressor shall pass through them any more: for now -have I seen with Mine eyes."[108] "The angel of His presence saved -them: in His love and in His pity He redeemed them; and He bare them, -and carried them all the days of old."[109] - -But what is the exact meaning of all these lovely promises? They do not -mean that God's children and saints will always be shielded from anguish -or defeat, from the triumph of their enemies, or even from apparently -hopeless and final failure, or miserable death. The lesson is not that -their persons shall be inviolable, or that the enemies who advance -against them to eat up their flesh shall always stumble and fall. The -experiences of tens of thousands of troubled lives and martyred ends -instantly prove the futility of any such reading of these assurances. -The saints of God, the prophets of God, have died in exile and in -prison, have been tortured on the rack and broken on the wheel, and -burnt to ashes at innumerable stakes; they have been destitute, -afflicted, tormented, in their lives--stoned, beheaded, sawn asunder, in -every form of hideous death; they have rotted in miry dungeons, have -starved on desolate shores, have sighed out their souls into the -agonising flame. The Cross of Christ stands as the emblem and the -explanation of their lives, which fools count to be madness, and their -end without honour. On earth they have, far more often than not, been -crushed by the hatred and been delivered over to the will of their -enemies. Where, then, have been those horses and chariots of fire? - -They have been there no less than around Elisha at Dothan. The eyes -spiritually opened have seen them, even when the sword flashed, or the -flames wrapped them in indescribable torment. The sense of God's -protection has least deserted His saints when to the world's eyes they -seemed to have been most utterly abandoned. There has been a joy in -prisons and at stakes, it has been said, far exceeding the joy of -harvest. "Pray for me," said a poor boy of fifteen, who was being -burned at Smithfield in the fierce days of Mary Tudor. "I would as -soon pray for a dog as for a heretic like thee," answered one of the -spectators. "Then, Son of God, shine Thou upon me!" cried the -boy-martyr; and instantly, upon a dull and cloudy day, the sun shone -out, and bathed his young face in glory; whereat, says the -martyrologist, men greatly marvelled. But is there one death-bed of a -saint on which that glory has not shone? - -The presence of those horses and chariots of fire, unseen by the -carnal eye--the promises which, if they be taken literally, all -experience seems to frustrate--mean two things, which they who are the -heirs of such promises, and who would without them be of all men most -miserable, have clearly understood. - -They mean, first, that as long as a child of God is on the path of -duty, and until that duty has been fulfilled, he is inviolable and -invulnerable. He shall tread upon the lion and the adder; the young -lion and the dragon shall he trample under his feet. He shall take up -the serpent in his hands; and if he drink any deadly thing, it shall -not hurt him. He shall not be afraid of the terror by night, nor of -the arrow that flieth by day; of the pestilence that walketh in -darkness, nor of the demon that destroyeth in the noonday. A thousand -shall fall at his right hand, and ten thousand beside him; but it -shall not come nigh him. The histories and the legends of numberless -marvellous deliverances all confirm the truth that, when a man fears -the Lord, He will keep him in all his ways, and give His angels charge -over him, lest at any time he dash his foot against a stone. God will -not permit any mortal force, or any combination of forces, to hinder -the accomplishment of the task entrusted to His servant. It is the -sense of this truth which, under circumstances however menacing, -should enable us to - - "bate no jot - Of heart or hope, but still bear up, and steer - Uphillward" - -It is this conviction which has nerved men to face insuperable -difficulties, and achieve impossible and unhoped-for ends. It works in -the spirit of the cry, "Who art thou, O great mountain? Before -Zerubbabel be thou changed into a plain!" It inspires the faith as a -grain of mustard seed which is able to say to this mountain, "Be thou -removed, and be thou cast into the sea,"--and it shall obey. It stands -unmoved upon the pinnacle of the Temple whereon it has been placed, -while the enemy and the tempter, smitten by amazement, falls. In the -hour of difficulty it can cry,-- - - "Rescue me, O Lord, in this mine evil hour, - As of old so many by Thy mighty power,-- - Enoch and Elias from the common doom; - Noe from the waters in a saving home; - Abraham from the abounding guilt of heathenesse; - Job from all his multiform and fell distress; - Isaac when his faither's knife was raised to slay; - Lot from burning Sodom on the judgment day; - Moses from the land of bondage and despair; - Daniel from the hungry lions in their lair; - And the children three amid the furnace flame; - Chaste Susanna from the slander and the shame; - David from Golia, and the wrath of Saul; - And the two Apostles from their prison-thrall." - -The strangeness, the unexpectedness, the apparently inadequate source -of the deliverance, have deepened the trust that it has not been due -to accident. Once, when Felix of Nola was flying from his enemies, he -took refuge in a cave, and he had scarcely entered it before a spider -began to spin its web over the fissure. The pursuer, passing by, saw -the spider's web, and did not look into the cave; and the saint, as he -came out into safety, remarked: "_Ubi Deus est, ibi aranea murus, ubi -non est ibi murus aranea_" ("Where God is, a spider's web is as a -wall; where He is not, a wall is but as a spider's web"). - -This is one lesson conveyed in the words of Christ when the Pharisees -told Him that Herod desired to kill Him. He knew that Herod could not -kill Him till He had done His Father's will and finished His work. "Go -ye," He said, "and tell this fox, Behold, I cast out devils, and I do -cures to-day and to-morrow, and the third day I shall be perfected. -Nevertheless, I must walk to-day, and to-morrow, and the day following." - -But had all this been otherwise--had Felix been seized by his pursuers -and perished, as has been the common lot of God's prophets and -heroes--he would not therefore have felt himself mocked by these -exceeding great and precious promises. The chariots and horses of fire -are still there, and are there to work a deliverance yet greater and -more eternal. Their office is not to deliver the perishing body, but -to carry into God's glory the immortal soul. This is indicated in the -death-scene of Elijah. This was the vision of the dying Stephen. This -was what Christian legend meant when it embellished with beautiful -incidents such scenes as the death of Polycarp. This was what led -Bunyan to write, when he describes the death of Christian, that "all -the trumpets sounded for him on the other side." When poor Captain -Allan Gardiner lay starving to death in that Antarctic isle with his -wretched companions, he yet painted on the entrance of the cave which -had sheltered them, and near to which his remains were found, a hand -pointing downward at the words, "Though He slay me, yet will I put my -trust in Him." - -There was a touch of almost joyful humour in the way in which Elisha -proceeded to use, in the present emergency, the power of Divine -deliverance. He seems to have gone out of the town and down the hill -to the Syrian captains,[110] and prayed God to send them illusion -([Greek: ablepsia]), so that they might be misled.[111] Then he boldly -said to them, "You are being deceived: you have come the wrong way, -and to the wrong city. I will take you to the man whom ye seek." The -incident reminds us of the story of Athanasius, who, when he was being -pursued on the Nile, took the opportunity of a bend of the river -boldly to turn back his boat towards Alexandria. "Do you know where -Athanasius is?" shouted the pursuers. "He is not far off!" answered -the disguised Archbishop; and the emissaries of Constantius went on in -the opposite direction from that in which he made his escape. - -Elisha led the Syrians in their delusion straight into the city of -Samaria, where they suddenly found themselves at the mercy of the king -and his troops. Delighted at so great a chance of vengeance, Jehoram -eagerly exclaimed, "My father, shall I smite, shall I smite?" - -Certainly the request cannot be regarded as unnatural, when we remember -that in the Book of Deuteronomy, which did not come to light till after -this period, we read the rule that, when the Israelites had taken a -besieged city, "thou shalt smite every male thereof with the edge of the -sword";[112] and that when Israel defeated the Midianites[113] they slew -all the males, and Moses was wroth with the officers of the host -because they had not also slain all the women. He then (as we are told) -ordered them to slay all except the virgins, and also--horrible to -relate--"_every male among the little ones_." The spirit of Elisha on -this occasion was larger and more merciful. It almost rose to the spirit -of Him who said, "It was said to them of old time, Thou shalt love thy -neighbour and hate thine enemy; but I say unto you, Love your enemies; -forgive them that hate you; do good unto them that despitefully use you -and persecute you." He asked Jehoram reproachfully whether he would even -have smitten those whom he had taken captive with sword and bow.[114] He -not only bade the king to spare them, but to set food before them, and -send them home. Jehoram did so at great expense, and the narrative ends -by telling us that the example of such merciful generosity produced so -favourable an impression that "the bands of Syria came no more into the -land of Israel." - -It is difficult, however, to see where this statement can be -chronologically fitted in. The very next chapter--so loosely is the -compilation put together, so completely is the sequence of events here -neglected--begins with telling us that Benhadad with all his host went -up and besieged Samaria. Any peace or respite gained by Elisha's -compassionate magnanimity must, in any case, have been exceedingly -short-lived. Josephus tries to get over the difficulty by drawing a -sufficiently futile distinction between marauding bands and a direct -invasion,[115] and he says that King Benhadad gave up his frays through -_fear_ of Elisha. But, in the first place, the encompassing of Dothan -had been carried out by "_a great host_ with horses and chariots," which -is hardly consistent with the notion of a foray, though it creates new -difficulties as to the numbers whom Elisha led to Samaria; secondly, the -substitution of a direct invasion for predatory incursions would have -been no gain to Israel, but a more deadly peril; and, thirdly, if it was -fear of Elisha which stopped the king's raids, it is strange that it had -no effect in preventing his invasions. We have, however, no data for any -final solution of these problems, and it is useless to meet them with a -network of idle conjectures. Such difficulties naturally occur in -narratives so vague and unchronological as those presented to us in the -documents from the story of Elisha which the compiler wove into his -history of Israel and Judah.[116] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[104] Gen. xxxvii. 17, _Dothain_, "two wells" (?). - -[105] Psalm xci. 4. - -[106] Psalm xxxiv. 7. - -[107] Psalm xci. 11. - -[108] Zech. ix. 8. - -[109] Isa. lxiii. 9. - -[110] Adopting the reading of the Syriac version: "And when they -[Elisha and his servant] came down to them [the Syrians]." The -ordinary reading is "to _him_," which makes the narrative less clear. - -[111] 2 Kings vi. 19. [Hebrew: manverim], [Greek: aorasia], only found -in Gen. xix. 11. - -[112] Deut. xx. 13. - -[113] Num. xxxi. 7. - -[114] Vulg., _Non percuties; neque enim cepisti eos ... ut percutias._ - -[115] Jos., _Antt._, IX. iv. 4, [Greek: Krypha men ouketi ... phaneros -de]. - -[116] Kittel, following Kuenen, surmises that this story has got -misplaced; that it does not belong to the days of Jehoram ben-Ahab and -Benhadad II., but to the days of Jehoahaz ben-Jehu and Benhadad III., -the son of Hazael (_Gesch. der Hebr._, 249). In a very uncertain -question I have followed the conclusion arrived at by the majority of -scholars, ancient and modern. - - - - - CHAPTER VIII - - _THE FAMINE AND THE SIEGE_ - - 2 KINGS vi. 24-vii. 20 - - "'Tis truly no good plan when princes play - The vulture among carrion; but when - They play the carrion among vultures--that - Is ten times worse." - LESSING, _Nathan the Wise_, Act I., Sc. 3. - - -If the Benhadad, King of Syria, who reduced Samaria to the horrible -straits recorded in this chapter, (2 Kings vi.) was the same Benhadad -whom Ahab had treated with such impolitic confidence, his hatred -against Israel must indeed have burned hotly. Besides the affair at -Dothan, he had already been twice routed with enormous slaughter, and -against those disasters he could only set the death of Ahab at -Ramoth-Gilead. It is obvious from the preceding narrative that he -could advance at any time at his will and pleasure into the heart of -his enemy's country, and shut him up in his capital almost without -resistance. The siege-trains of ancient days were very inefficient, -and any strong fortress could hold out for years, if only it was well -provisioned. Such was not the case with Samaria, and it was reduced to -a condition of sore famine. Food so loathsome as an ass's head, which -at other times the poorest would have spurned, was now sold for eighty -shekels' weight of silver (about L8); and the fourth part of a -_xestes_ or _kab_--which was itself the smallest dry-measure, the -sixth part of a _seah_--of the coarse, common pulse, or roasted -chick-peas, vulgarly known as "dove's dung," fetched five shekels -(about 12_s._ 6_d._).[117] - -While things were at this awful pass, "the King of Israel," as he is -vaguely called throughout this story, went his rounds upon the wall to -visit the sentries and encourage the soldiers in their defence. As he -passed, a woman cried, "Help, my lord, O king!" In Eastern monarchies -the king is a judge of the humblest; a suppliant, however mean, may -cry to him. Jehoram thought that this was but one of the appeals which -sprang from the clamorous mendicity of famine with which he had grown -so painfully familiar. "The Lord curse you!" he exclaimed -impatiently.[118] "How can I help you? Every barn-floor is bare, every -wine-press drained." And he passed on. - -But the woman continued her wild clamour, and turning round at her -importunity, he asked, "What aileth thee?" - -He heard in reply a narrative as appalling as ever smote the ear of a -king in a besieged city. Among the curses denounced upon apostate Israel -in the Pentateuch, we read, "Ye shall eat the flesh of your sons, and -the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat";[119] or, as it is expressed -more fully in the Book of Deuteronomy, "He shall besiege thee in all -thy gates throughout all thy land.... And thou shalt eat the fruit of -thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and thy daughters, which the Lord -thy God hath given thee, in the siege, and in the straitness wherewith -thine enemies shall distress thee: so that the man that is tender among -you, and very delicate, his eye shall be evil towards his brother, and -towards the wife of his bosom, and towards the remnant of his children -which he shall leave; so that he shall not give to any of them of the -flesh of his children whom he shall eat, because he hath nothing left -him in the siege.... The tender and delicate woman, which would not -adventure to set the sole of her foot upon the ground for delicateness -and tenderness, her eye shall be evil towards the husband of her bosom, -and towards her son, and towards her daughter, and towards her children: -for she shall eat them for want of all things secretly in the siege and -the straitness, if thou wilt not observe to do all the words of the law, -... that thou mayest fear the glorious and fearful name, _The Lord thy -God_."[120] We find almost the same words in the prophet Jeremiah;[121] -and in Lamentations we read: "The hands of the pitiful women have sodden -their own children: they were their meat in the destruction of the -daughter of My people."[122] - -Isaiah asks, "Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not -have compassion on the son of her womb?" Alas! it has always been so in -those awful scenes of famine, whether after shipwreck or in beleaguered -cities, when man becomes degraded to an animal, with all an animal's -primitive instincts, and when the wild beast appears under the thin -veneer of civilisation. So it was at the siege of Jerusalem, and at the -siege of Magdeburg, and at the wreck of the _Medusa_, and on many -another occasion when the pangs of hunger have corroded away every -vestige of the tender affections and of the moral sense. - -And this had occurred at Samaria: her women had become cannibals and -devoured their own little ones. - -"This woman," screamed the suppliant, pointing her lean finger at a -wretch like herself--"this woman said unto me, 'Give thy son, that we -may eat him to-day, and we will afterwards eat my son.' I yielded to -her suggestion. We killed my little son, and ate his flesh when we had -sodden it. Next day I said to her, 'Now give thy son, that we may eat -him'; and she hath hid her son!" - -How could the king answer such a horrible appeal? Injustice had been -done; but was he to order and to sanction by way of redress fresh -cannibalism, and the murder by its mother of another babe? In that -foul obliteration of every natural instinct, what could he do, what -could any man do? Can there be equity among raging wild beasts, when -they roar for their prey and are unfed? - -All that the miserable king could do was to rend his clothes in horror -and to pass on, and as his starving subjects passed by him on the wall -they saw that he wore sackcloth beneath his purple, in sign, if not of -repentance, yet of anguish, if not of prayer, yet of uttermost -humiliation.[123] - -But if indeed he had, in his misery, donned that sackcloth in order -that at least the semblance of self-mortification might move Jehovah -to pity, as it had done in the case of his father Ahab, the external -sign of his humility had done nothing to change his heart. The -gruesome appeal to which he had just been forced to listen only -kindled him to a burst of fury[124].The man who had warned, who had -prophesied, who so far during this siege had not raised his finger to -help--the man who was believed to be able to wield the powers of -heaven, and had wrought no deliverance for his people, but suffered -them to sink unaided into these depths of abjectness--should he be -permitted to live? If Jehovah would not help, of what use was Elisha? -"God do so to me, and more also," exclaimed Jehoram--using his -mother's oath to Elijah[125]--"if the head of Elisha, the son of -Shaphat, shall stand on him this day." - -Was this the king who had come to Elisha with such humble entreaty, -when three armies were perishing of thirst before the eyes of Moab? -Was this the king who had called Elisha "my father," when the prophet -had led the deluded host of Syrians into Samaria, and bidden Jehoram -to set large provision before them? It was the same king, but now -transported with fury and reduced to despair. His threat against God's -prophet was in reality a defiance of God, as when our unhappy -Plantagenet, Henry II., maddened by the loss of Le Mans, exclaimed -that, since God had robbed him of the town he loved, he would pay God -out by robbing Him of that which He most loved in him--his soul. - -Jehoram's threat was meant in grim earnest, and he sent an executioner -to carry it out. Elisha was sitting in his house with the elders of -the city, who had come to him for counsel at this hour of supreme -need. He knew what was intended for him, and it had also been revealed -to him that the king would follow his messenger to cancel his -sanguinary threat. "See ye," he said to the elders, "how this son of a -murderer"--for again he indicates his contempt and indignation for the -son of Ahab and Jezebel--"hath sent to behead me! When he comes, shut -the door, and hold it fast against him. His master is following hard -at his heels." - -The messenger came, and was refused admittance. The king followed -him,[126] and entering the room where the prophet and elders sat, he -gave up his wicked design of slaying Elisha with the sword, but he -overwhelmed him with reproaches, and in despair renounced all further -trust in Jehovah. Elisha, as the king's words imply, must have refused -all permission to capitulate: he must have held out from the first a -promise that God would send deliverance. But no deliverance had come. -The people were starving. Women were devouring their babes. Nothing -worse could happen if they flung open their gates to the Syrian host. -"Behold," the king said, "this evil is Jehovah's doing. You have -deceived us. Jehovah does not intend to deliver us. Why should I wait -for Him any longer?" Perhaps the king meant to imply that his mother's -Baal was better worth serving, and would never have left his votaries -to sink into these straits. - -And now man's extremity had come, and it was God's opportunity. Elisha -at last was permitted to announce that the worst was over, that the -next day plenty should smile on the besieged city. "Thus saith the -Lord," he exclaimed to the exhausted and despondent king, "To-morrow -about this time, instead of an ass's head being sold for eighty -shekels, and a thimbleful of pulse for five shekels, a peck of fine -flour shall be sold for a shekel, and two pecks of barley for a -shekel, in the gate of Samaria." - -The king was leaning on the hand of his chief officer, and to this -soldier the promise seemed not only incredible, but silly: for at the -best he could only suppose that the Syrian host would raise the siege; -and though to hope for that looked an absurdity, yet even that would -not in the least fulfil the immense prediction. He answered, -therefore, in utter scorn: "Yes! Jehovah is making windows in heaven! -But even thus could this be?" It is much as if he should have answered -some solemn pledge with a derisive proverb such as, "Yes! if the sky -should fall, we should catch larks!" - -Such contemptuous repudiation of a Divine promise was a blasphemy; and -answering scorn with scorn, and riddle with riddling, Elisha answers -the mocker, "Yes! and _you_ shall see this, but shall not enjoy it." - -The word of the Lord was the word of a true prophet, and the miracle -was wrought. Not only was the siege raised, but the wholly unforeseen -spoil of the entire Syrian camp, with all its accumulated rapine, -brought about the predicted plenty. - -There were four lepers[127] outside the gate of Samaria, like the -leprous mendicants who gather there to this day. They were cut off -from all human society, except their own. Leprosy was treated as -contagious, and if "houses of the unfortunate" (_Biut-el-Masakin_) -were provided for them, as seems to have been the case at Jerusalem, -they were built outside the city walls.[128] They could only live by -beggary, and this was an aggravation of their miserable condition. And -how could any one fling food to these beggars over the walls, when -food of any kind was barely to be had within them? - -So taking counsel of their despair, they decided that they would -desert to the Syrians: among them they would at least find food, if -their lives were spared; and if not, death would be a happy release -from their present misery. - -So in the evening twilight, when they could not be seen or shot at -from the city wall as deserters, they stole down to the Syrian camp. - -When they reached its outermost circle, to their amazement all was -silence. They crept into one of the tents in fear and astonishment. -There was food and drink there, and they satisfied the cravings of -their hunger. It was also stored with booty from the plundered cities -and villages of Israel. To this they helped themselves, and took it -away and hid it. Having spoiled this tent, they entered a second. It -was likewise deserted, and they carried a fresh store of treasures to -their hiding-place. And then they began to feel uneasy at not -divulging to their starving fellow-citizens the strange and golden -tidings of a deserted camp. The night was wearing on; day would reveal -the secret. If they carried the good news, they would doubtless earn a -rich guerdon. If they waited till morning, they might be put to death -for their selfish reticence and theft. It was safest to return to the -city, and rouse the warder, and send a message to the palace. So the -lepers hurried back through the night, and shouted to the sentinel at -the gate, "We went to the Syrian camp, and it was deserted! Not a man -was there, not a sound was to be heard. The horses were tethered -there, and the asses, and the tents were left just as they were." - -The sentinel called the other watchmen to hear the wonderful news, and -instantly ran with it to the palace. The slumbering house was roused; -and though it was still night, the king himself arose. But he could not -shake off his despondency, and made no reference to Elisha's prediction. -News sometimes sounds too good to be true. "It is only a decoy," he -said. "They can only have left their camp to lure us into an ambuscade, -that they may return, and slaughter us, and capture our city." - -"Send to see," answered one of his courtiers. "Send five horsemen to -test the truth, and to look out. If they perish, their fate is but the -fate of us all." - -So two chariots with horses were despatched, with instructions not -only to visit the camp, but track the movements of the host. - -They went, and found that it was as the lepers had said. The camp was -deserted, and lay there as an immense booty; and for some reason the -Syrians had fled towards the Jordan to make good their escape to -Damascus by the eastern bank. The whole road was strewn with the traces -of their headlong flight; it was full of scattered garments and vessels. - -Probably, too, the messengers came across some disabled fugitive, and -learnt the secret of this amazing stampede. It was the result of one of -those sudden unaccountable panics to which the huge, unwieldy, -heterogeneous Eastern armies, which have no organised system of -sentries, and no trained discipline, are constantly liable. We have -already met with several instances in the history of Israel. Such was -the panic which seized the Midianites when Gideon's three hundred blew -their trumpets; and the panic of the Syrians before Ahab's pages of the -provinces; and of the combined armies in the Valley of Salt; and of the -Moabites at Wady-el-Ahsy; and afterwards of the Assyrians before the -walls of Jerusalem. Fear is physically contagious, and, when once it has -set in, it swells with such unaccountable violence, that the Greeks -called these terrors "panic," because they believed them to be directly -inspired by the god Pan. Well-disciplined as was the army of the Ten -Thousand Greeks in their famous retreat, they nearly fell victims to a -sudden panic, had not Clearchus, with prompt resource, published by the -herald the proclamation of a reward for the arrest of the man who had -let the ass loose. Such an unaccountable terror--caused by a noise as of -chariots and of horses which reverberated among the hills--had seized -the Syrian host. They thought that Jehoram had secretly hired an army of -the princes of the Khetas[129] and of the Egyptians to march suddenly -upon them. In wild confusion, not stopping to reason or to inquire, they -took to flight, increasing their panic by the noise and rush of their -own precipitance. - -No sooner had the messengers delivered their glad tidings, than the -people of Samaria began to pour tumultuously out of the gates, to -fling themselves on the food and on the spoil. It was like the rush of -the dirty, starving, emaciated wretches which horrified the keepers -of the reserved stores at Smolensk in Napoleon's retreat from Moscow, -and forced them to shut the gates, and fling food and grain to the -struggling soldiers out of the windows of the granaries. To secure -order and prevent disaster, the king appointed his attendant lord to -keep the gate. But the torrent of people flung him down, and they -trampled on his body in their eagerness for relief. He died after -having seen that the promise of Elisha was fulfilled, and that the -cheapness and abundance had been granted, the prophecy of which he -thought only fit for his sceptical derision. - -"The sudden panic which delivered the city," says Dean Stanley, "is -the one marked intervention on behalf of the northern capital. No -other incident could be found in the sacred annals so appropriately to -express, in the Church of Gouda, the pious gratitude of the citizens -of Leyden, for their deliverance from the Spanish army, as the -miraculous raising of the siege of Samaria."[130] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[117] So _asafoetida_ is called "devil's dung" in Germany; and the -_Herba alcali_, "sparrow's dung" by Arabs. The _Q'ri_, however, supports -the _literal_ meaning; and compare 2 Kings xviii. 27; Jos., _B. J._, V. -xiii. 7. Analogies for these prices are quoted from classic authors. -Plutarch (_Artax._, xxiv.) mentions a siege in which an ass's head could -hardly be got for sixty drachmas (L2 10_s._), though usually the whole -animal only cost L1. Pliny (_H. N._, viii. 57) says that during -Hannibal's siege of Casilinum a mouse sold for L6 5_s._ - -[118] So Clericus. Comp. Jos. [Greek: eperasato aute]. - -[119] Lev. xxvi. 29. - -[120] Deut. xxviii. 52-58. - -[121] Jer. xix. 9. - -[122] Lam. iv. 10: comp. ii. 20; Ezek. v. 10; Jos., _B. J._, VI. iii. 4. - -[123] 1 Kings xxi. 27; Isa. xx. 2, 3. - -[124] Compare the wrath of Pashur the priest in consequence of the -denunciation of Jeremiah (Jer. xx. 2). - -[125] 1 Kings xix. 2. - -[126] In 2 Kings vi. 33 we should read _melek_ (king) for _maleak_ -(messenger). Jehoram repented of his hasty order. - -[127] The Jews say Gehazi, and his three sons (Jarchi). - -[128] Lev. xiii. 46; Num. v. 2, 3. - -[129] The capitals of the ancient Hittites--a nation whose fame had -been almost entirely obliterated till a few years ago--were -Karchemish, Kadesh, Hamath, and Helbon (Aleppo). - -[130] _Lectures_, ii. 345. - - - - - CHAPTER IX - - _THE SHUNAMMITE AND HAZAEL_ - - 2 KINGS viii. 1-6, 7-15. (Circ. B.C. 886.) - - "Our acts still follow with us from afar, - And what we have been makes us what we are." - GEORGE ELIOT. - - -The next anecdote of Elisha brings us once more into contact with the -Lady of Shunem. Famines, or dearths, were unhappily of very frequent -occurrence in a country which is so wholly dependent, as Palestine is, -upon the early and latter rain. On some former occasion Elisha had -foreseen that "Jehovah had called for a famine"; for the sword, the -famine, and the pestilence are represented as ministers who wait His -bidding.[131] He had also foreseen that it would be of long duration, -and in kindness to the Shunammite had warned her that she had better -remove for a time into a land in which there was greater plenty. It -was under similar circumstances that Elimelech and Naomi, ancestors of -David's line, had taken their sons Mahlon and Chilion, and gone to -live in the land of Moab; and, indeed, the famine which decided the -migration of Jacob and his children into Egypt had been a -turning-point in the history of the Chosen People. - -The Lady of Shunem had learnt by experience the weight of Elisha's -words. Her husband is not mentioned, and was probably dead; so she -arose with her household, and went for seven years to live in the -plain of Philistia. At the end of that time the dearth had ceased, and -she returned to Shunem, but only to find that during her absence her -house and land were in possession of other owners, and had probably -escheated to the Crown. The king was the ultimate, and to a great -extent the only, source of justice in his little kingdom, and she went -to lay her claim before him and demand the restitution of her -property. By a providential circumstance she came exactly at the most -favourable moment. The king--it must have been Jehoram--was at the -very time talking to Gehazi about the great works of Elisha. As it is -unlikely that he would converse long with a leper, and as Gehazi is -still called "the servant of the man of God," the incident may here be -narrated out of order. It is pleasant to find Jehoram taking so deep -an interest in the prophet's story. Already on many occasions during -his wars with Moab and Syria, as well as on the occasion of Naaman's -visit, if that had already occurred, he had received the completest -proof of the reality of Elisha's mission, but he might be naturally -unaware of the many private incidents in which he had exhibited a -supernatural power. Among other stories Gehazi was telling him that of -the Shunammite, and how Elisha had given life to her dead son. At that -juncture she came before the king, and Gehazi said, "My lord, O king, -this is the very woman, and this is her son whom Elisha recalled to -life." In answer to Jehoram's questions she confirmed the story, and -he was so much impressed by the narrative that he not only ordered -the immediate restitution of her land, but also of the value of its -products during the seven years of her exile. - -We now come to the fulfilment of the second of the commands which -Elijah had received so long before at Horeb. To complete the -retribution which was yet to fall on Israel, he had been bidden to -anoint Hazael to be king of Syria in the room of Benhadad. Hitherto -the mandate had remained unfulfilled, because no opportunity had -occurred; but the appointed time had now arrived. Elisha, for some -purpose, and during an interval of peace, visited Damascus, where the -visit of Naaman and the events of the Syrian wars had made his name -very famous. Benhadad II., grandson or great-grandson of Rezin, after -a stormy reign of some thirty years, marked by some successes, but -also by the terrible reverses already recorded, lay dangerously ill. -Hearing the news that the wonder-working prophet of Israel was in his -capital, he sent to ask of him the question, "Shall I recover?" It had -been the custom from the earliest days to propitiate the favour of -prophets by presents, without which even the humblest suppliant hardly -ventured to approach them.[132] The gift sent by Benhadad was truly -royal, for he thought perhaps that he could purchase the intercession -or the miraculous intervention of this mighty thaumaturge. He sent -Hazael with a selection "of every good thing of Damascus," and, like -an Eastern, he endeavoured to make his offering seem more -magnificent[133] by distributing it on the backs of forty camels. - -At the head of this imposing procession of camels walked Hazael, the -commander of the forces, and stood in Elisha's presence with the -humble appeal, "Thy son Benhadad, King of Syria, hath sent me to thee, -saying, Shall I recover of this disease?" - -About the king's munificence we are told no more, but we cannot doubt -that it was refused. If Naaman's still costlier blessing had been -rejected, though he was about to receive through Elisha's ministration -an inestimable boon, it is unlikely that Elisha would accept a gift -for which he could offer no return, and which, in fact, directly or -indirectly, involved the death of the sender. But the historian does -not think it necessary to pause and tell us that Elisha sent back the -forty camels unladen of their treasures. It was not worth while to -narrate what was a matter of course. If it had been no time, a few -years earlier, to receive money and garments, and olive-yards and -vineyards, and men-servants and maid-servants, still less was it a -time to do so now. The days were darker now than they had been, and -Elisha himself stood near the Great White Throne. The protection of -these fearless prophets lay in their utter simplicity of soul. They -rose above human fears because they stood above human desires. What -Elisha possessed was more than sufficient for the needs of the plain -and humble life of one whose communing was with God. It was not -wonderful that prophets should rise to an elevation whence they could -look down with indifference upon the superfluities of the lust of the -eyes and the pride of life, when even sages of the heathen have -attained to a similar independence of earthly luxuries. One who can -climb such mountain-heights can look with silent contempt on gold. - -But there is a serious difficulty about Elisha's answer to the -embassage. "Go, say unto him"--so it is rendered in our Authorised -Version--"Thou mayest certainly recover: howbeit the Lord hath showed -me that he shall surely die." - -It is evident that the translators of 1611 meant the emphasis to be -laid on the "_mayest_," and understood the answer of Elisha to mean, -"Thy recovery is quite possible; and yet"--he adds to Hazael, and not -as part of his answer to the king--"Jehovah has shown me that dying he -shall die,"--not indeed of this disease, but by other means before he -has recovered from it. - -Unfortunately, however, the Hebrew will not bear this meaning. Elisha -bids Hazael to go back with the distinct message, "Thou shalt surely -recover," as it is rightly rendered in the Revised Version. - -This, however, is the rendering, not of the _written_ text as it stands, -but of the margin. Every one knows that in the Masoretic original the -text itself is called the K'thib, or "what is written," whereas the -margin is called _Q'ri_, "read." Now, our translators, both those of -1611 and those of the Revision Committee, all but invariably follow the -Kethib as the most authentic reading. In this instance, however, they -abandon the rule and translate the marginal reading. - -What, then, is the written text? - -It is the reverse of the marginal reading, for it has: "Go, say, Thou -shalt _not_ recover." - -The reader may naturally ask the cause of this startling discrepancy. - -It seems to be twofold. - -(I.) Both the Hebrew word _lo_, "not" ([Hebrew: lo]), and the word -_lo_, "to him" ([Hebrew: lo]), have precisely the same pronunciation. -Hence this text might mean either "Go, say _to him_, Thou shalt -certainly recover," or "Go, say, Thou shalt _not_ recover." The same -identity of the negative and the dative of the preposition has made -nonsense of another passage of the Authorised Version, where "Thou -hast multiplied the nation, and _not_ increased the joy: they joy -before Thee according to the joy of harvest," should be "Thou hast -multiplied the nation, and increased _its_ joy." So, too, the verse -"It is He that hath made us, and _not_ we ourselves," may mean "It is -He that hath made us, and _to Him_ we belong." In the present case the -adoption of the negative (which would have conveyed to Benhadad the -exact truth) is not possible; for it makes the next clause and its -introduction by the word "Howbeit" entirely meaningless. - -But (II.) this confusion in the text might not have arisen in the -present instance but for the difficulty of Elisha's appearing to send -a deliberately false message to Benhadad, and a message which he tells -Hazael at the time is false. - -Can this be deemed impossible? - -With the views prevalent in "those times of ignorance," I think not. -Abraham and Isaac, saints and patriarchs as they were, both told -practical falsehoods about their wives. They, indeed, were reproved -for this, though not severely; but, on the other hand, Jael is not -reproved for her treachery to Sisera; and Samuel, under the semblance -of a Divine permission, used a diplomatic ruse when he visited the -household of Jesse; and in the apologue of Micaiah a lying spirit is -represented as sent forth to do service to Jehovah; and Elisha himself -tells a deliberate falsehood to the Syrians at Dothan. The -sensitiveness to the duty of always speaking the exact truth is not -felt in the East with anything like the intensity that it is in -Christian lands; and reluctant as we should be to find in the message -of Elisha another instance of that _falsitas dispensativa_ which has -been so fatally patronised by some of the Fathers and by many Romish -theologians, the love of truth itself would compel us to accept this -view of the case, if there were no other possible interpretation. - -I think, however, that another view is possible. I think that Elisha -may have said to Hazael, "Go, say unto him, Thou shalt surely -recover," with the same accent of irony in which Micaiah said at first -to the two kings, "Go up to Ramoth-Gilead, and prosper; for the Lord -shall deliver it into the hand of the king." I think that his whole -manner and the tone of his voice may have shown to Hazael, and may -have been meant to show him, that this was not Elisha's real message -to Benhadad. Or, to adopt the same line of explanation with an -unimportant difference, Elisha may have meant to imply, "Go, follow -the bent which I know you _will_ follow; go, carry back to your master -the lying message that I said he would recover. But that is not _my_ -message. My message, whether it suits your courtier instincts or not, -is that Jehovah has warned me that he shall surely die." - -That some such meaning as this attaches to the verse seems to be shown -by the context. For not only was some reproof involved in Elisha's -words, but he showed his grief still more by his manner. It was as -though he had said, "Take back what message you choose, but Benhadad -will certainly die"; and then he fastened his steady gaze on the -soldier's countenance, till Hazael blushed and became uneasy. Only -when he noted that Hazael's conscience was troubled by the glittering -eyes which seemed to read the inmost secrets of his heart did Elisha -drop his glance, and burst into tears. "Why weepeth, my lord?" asked -Hazael, in still deeper uneasiness. Whereupon Elisha revealed to him -the future. "I weep," he said, "because I see in thee the curse and -the avenger of the sins of my native land. Thou wilt become to them a -sword of God; thou wilt set their fortresses on fire; thou wilt -slaughter their youths; thou wilt dash their little ones to pieces -against the stones; thou wilt rip up their women with child." That he -actually inflicted these savageries of warfare on the miserable -Israelites we are not told, but we are told that he smote them in all -their coasts; that Jehovah delivered them into his hands; that he -oppressed Israel all the days of Jehoahaz.[134] That being so, there -can be no question that he carried out the same laws of atrocious -warfare which belonged to those times and continued long afterwards. -Such atrocities were not only inflicted on the Israelites again and -again by the Assyrians and others,[135] but they themselves had often -inflicted them, and inflicted them with what they believed to be -Divine approval, on their own enemies.[136] Centuries after, one of -their own poets accounted it a beatitude to him who should dash the -children of the Babylonians against the stones.[137] - -As the answer of Hazael is usually read and interpreted, we are taught -to regard it as an indignant declaration that he could never be guilty -of such vile deeds. It is regarded as though it were "an abhorrent -repudiation of his future self." The lesson often drawn from it in -sermons is that a man may live to do, and to delight in, crimes which -he once hated and deemed it impossible that he should ever commit. - -The lesson is a most true one, and is capable of a thousand -illustrations. It conveys the deeply needed warning that those who, -even in thought, dabble with wrong courses, which they only regard as -venial peccadilloes, may live to commit, without any sense of horror, -the most enormous offences. It is the explanation of the terrible fact -that youths who once seemed innocent and holy-minded may grow up, step -by step, into colossal criminals. "Men," says Scherer, "advance -unconsciously from errors to faults, and from faults to crimes, till -sensibility is destroyed by the habitual spectacle of guilt, and the -most savage atrocities come to be dignified by the name of State -policy." - - "Lui-meme a son portrait force de rendre hommage, - Il fremira d'horreur devant sa propre image." - -But true and needful as these lessons are, they are entirely beside the -mark as deduced from the story of Hazael. What he said was not, as in -our Authorised Version, "But what, is thy servant a dog, that he should -do this great thing?" nor by "great thing" does he mean "so deadly a -crime." His words, more accurately rendered in our Revision, are, "But -what is thy servant, which is but a dog, that he should do this great -thing?" or, "But what is the dog, thy servant?" It was a hypocritic -deprecation of the future importance and eminence which Elisha had -prophesied for him. There is not the least sense of horror either in his -words or in his thoughts. He merely means "A mere dog, such as I am, can -never accomplish such great designs." A dog in the East is utterly -despised;[138] and Hazael, with Oriental irony, calls himself a dog, -though he was the Syrian Commander-in-chief--just as a Chinaman, in -speaking of himself, adopts the periphrasis "this little thief." - -Elisha did not notice his sham humility, but told him, "The Lord hath -showed me that thou shalt be King over Syria." The date of the event -was B.C. 886. - -The scene has sometimes been misrepresented to Elisha's discredit, as -though he suggested to the general the crimes of murder and rebellion. -The accusation is entirely untenable. Elisha was, indeed, in one -sense, commissioned to anoint Hazael King of Syria, because the cruel -soldier had been predestined by God to that position; but, in another -sense, he had no power whatever to give to Hazael the mighty kingdom -of Aram, nor to wrest it from the dynasty which had now held it for -many generations. All this was brought about by the Divine purpose, in -a course of events entirely out of the sphere of the humble man of -God. In the transferring of this crown he was in no sense the agent or -the suggester. The thought of usurpation must, without doubt, have -been already in Hazael's mind. Benhadad, as far as we know, was -childless. At any rate he had no natural heirs, and seems to have been -a drunken king, whose reckless undertakings and immense failures had -so completely alienated the affections of his subjects from himself -and his dynasty, that he died undesired and unlamented, and no hand -was uplifted to strike a blow in his defence. It hardly needed a -prophet to foresee that the sceptre would be snatched by so strong a -hand as that of Hazael from a grasp so feeble as that of Benhadad II. -The utmost that Elisha had done was, under Divine guidance, to read -his character and his designs, and to tell him that the accomplishment -of these designs was near at hand. - -So Hazael went back to Benhadad, and in answer to the eager inquiry, -"What said Elisha to thee?" he gave the answer which Elisha had -foreseen that he meant to give, and which was in any case a falsehood, -for it suppressed half of what Elisha had really said. "He told me," -said Hazael, "that thou shouldest surely recover." - -Was the sequel of the interview the murder of Benhadad by Hazael? - -The story has usually been so read, but Elisha had neither prophesied -this nor suggested it. The sequel is thus described. "And it came to -pass on the morrow, that _he_ took the coverlet,[139] and dipped it in -water, and spread it on his face, so that he died: and Hazael reigned -in his stead." The repetition of the name Hazael in the last clause is -superfluous if he was the subject of the previous clause, and it has -been consequently conjectured that "he took" is merely the impersonal -idiom "one took." Some suppose that, as Benhadad was in the bath, his -servant took the bath-cloth, wetted it, and laid its thick folds over -the mouth of the helpless king; others, that he soaked the thick -quilt, which the king was too weak to lift away.[140] In either case -it is hardly likely that a great officer like Hazael would have been -in the bath-room or the bed-room of the dying king. Yet we must -remember that the Praetorian Praefect Macro is said to have suffocated -Tiberius with his bed-clothes. Josephus says that Hazael strangled his -master with a net; and, indeed, he has generally been held guilty of -the perpetration of the murder. But it is fair to give him the benefit -of the doubt. Be that as it may, he seems to have reigned for some -forty-six years (B.C. 886-840), and to have bequeathed the sceptre to -a son on whom he had bestowed the old dynastic name of Benhadad. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[131] Jer. xxv. 29; Ezek. xxxviii. 21. - -[132] See the cases of Samuel (1 Sam. ix. 7), of Ahijah (1 Kings xiv. -3), and of Elisha himself (2 Kings iv. 42). - -[133] As Jacob did in sending forward his present to Esau. Comp. -Chardin, _Voyages_, iii. 217. - -[134] 2 Kings x. 32, xiii. 3, 22. - -[135] Isa. xiii. 15, 16; Hos. x. 14, xiii. 16; Nah. iii. 10. - -[136] See Josh. vi. 17, 21; 1 Sam. xv. 3; Lev. xxvii. 28, 29. - -[137] Psalm cxxxvii. 9. - -[138] 1 Sam. xxiv. 14; 2 Sam. ix. 8. - -[139] [Hebrew: machber] Jos., _Antt._, IX. iv. 6, [Greek: diktuon -diabrochon]. Aquila, Symmachus, [Greek: to stroma]. Michaelis supposed -it to be the mosquito-net ([Greek: konopeion]). Comp. 1 Sam. xix. 13. -Ewald suggested "bath-mattress" (iii. 523). Sir G. Grove (_s.v._ -"Elisha," _Bibl. Dict._, ii. 923) mentions that Abbas Pasha is said to -have been murdered in the same manner. Some, however, think that the -measure was taken by way of cure (Bruce, _Travels_, iii. 33. -Klostermann, _ad loc._, alters the text at his pleasure). - -[140] 2 Kings viii. 15; LXX., [Greek: to machbar]; Vulg., _stragulum_; -lit., "woven cloth." - - - - - CHAPTER X - - (1) _JEHORAM BEN-JEHOSHAPHAT OF JUDAH_ - - B.C. 851-843 - - (2) _AHAZIAH BEN-JEHORAM OF JUDAH_ - - B.C. 843-842 - - 2 KINGS viii. 16-24, 25-29 - - "Bear like the Turk, no brother near the throne."--POPE. - - -The narrative now reverts to the kingdom of Judah, of which the -historian, mainly occupied with the great deeds of the prophet in -Israel, takes at this period but little notice. - -He tells us that in the fifth year of Jehoram of Israel, son of Ahab, -his namesake and brother-in-law, Jehoram of Judah, began to reign in -Judah, though his father, Jehoshaphat, was then king.[141] - -The statement is full of difficulties, especially as we have been -already told (i. 17) that Jehoram ben-Ahab of Israel began to reign in -the _second_ year of Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat of Judah, and (iii. 1) -in the eighteenth year of Jehoshaphat. It is hardly worth while to -pause here to disentangle these complexities in a writer who, like -most Eastern historians, is content with loose chronological -references. By the current mode of reckoning, the twenty-five years of -Jehoshaphat's reign may merely mean twenty-three and a month or two of -two other years; and some suppose that, when Jehoram of Judah was -about sixteen, his father went on the expedition against Moab, and -associated his son with him in the throne. This is only conjecture. -Jehoshaphat, of all kings, least needed a coadjutor, particularly so -weak and worthless a one as his son; and though the association of -colleagues with themselves has been common in some realms, there is -not a single instance of it in the history of Israel and Judah--the -case of Uzziah, who was a leper, not being to the point.[142] - -The kings both of Israel and of Judah at this period, with the single -exception of the brave and good Jehoshaphat, were unworthy and -miserable. The blight of the Jezebel-marriage and the curse of -Baal-worship lay upon both kingdoms. It is scarcely possible to find -such wretched monarchs as the two sons of Jezebel--Ahaziah and Jehoram -in Israel, and the son-in-law and grandson of Jezebel, Jehoram and -Ahaziah, in Judah. Their respective reigns are annals of shameful -apostasy, and almost unbroken disaster. - -Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat of Judah was thirty-two years old when he -began his independent reign, and reigned for eight deplorable years. -The fact that his mother's name is (exceptionally) omitted seems to -imply that his father Jehoshaphat set the good example of -monogamy.[143] Jehoram was wholly under the influence of Athaliah, his -wife, and of Jezebel, his mother-in-law, and he introduced into Judah -their alien abominations. He "walked in their way, and did evil in the -sight of the Lord." The Chronicler fills up the general remark by -saying that he did his utmost to foster idolatry by erecting _bamoth_ -in the mountains of Judah, and compelled his people to worship there, -in order to decentralise the religious services of the kingdom, and so -to diminish the glory of the Temple. He introduced Baal-worship into -Judah, and either he or his son was the guilty builder of a temple to -Baalim, not only on the "opprobrious mount" on which stood the -idolatrous chapels of Solomon, but on the Hill of the House itself. -This temple had its own high priest, and was actually adorned with -treasures torn from the Temple of Jehovah.[144] So bad was Jehoram's -conduct that the historian can only attribute his non-destruction to -the "covenant of salt" which God had made with David, "to give him a -lamp for his children always." - -But if actual destruction did not come upon him and his race, he came -very near such a fate, and he certainly experienced that "the path of -transgressors is hard." There is nothing to record about him but crime -and catastrophe. First Edom revolted. Jehoshaphat had subdued the -Edomites, and only allowed them to be governed by a vassal; now they -threw off the yoke. The Jewish King advanced against them to "Zair"--by -which must be meant apparently either Zoar (through which the road to -Edom lay), or their capital, Mount Seir.[145] There he was surrounded by -the Edomite hosts; and though by a desperate act of valour he cut his -way through them at night in spite of their reserve of chariots, yet his -army left him in the lurch.[146] Edom succeeded in establishing its -final independence, to which we see an allusion in the one hope held out -to Esau by Isaac in that "blessing" which was practically a curse. - -The loss of so powerful a subject-territory, which now constituted a -source of danger on the eastern frontier of Judah, was succeeded by -another disaster on the south-west, in the Shephelah or lowland plain. -Here Libnah revolted,[147] and by gaining its autonomy contracted yet -farther the narrow limits of the southern kingdom. - -The Book of Kings tells us no more about the Jewish Jehoram, only -adding that he died and was buried with his fathers, and was succeeded -by his son Ahaziah. But the Book of Chronicles, which adds far darker -touches to his character, also heightens to an extraordinary degree -the intensity of his punishment. It tells us that he began his reign -by the atrocious murder of his six younger brothers, for whom, -following the old precedent of Rehoboam, Jehoshaphat had provided by -establishing them as governors of various cities. As his throne was -secure, we cannot imagine any motive for this brutal massacre except -the greed of gain, and we can only suppose that, as Jehoram -ben-Jehoshaphat became little more than a friendly vassal of his -kinsmen in Israel, so he fell under the deadly influence of his wife -Athaliah, as completely as his father-in-law had done under the spell -of her mother Jezebel. With his brothers he also swept away a number -of the chief nobles, who perhaps embraced the cause of his murdered -kinsmen. Such conduct breathes the known spirit of Jezebel and of -Athaliah. To rebuke him for this wickedness, he received the menace of -a tremendous judgment upon his home and people in a writing from -_Elijah_, whom we should certainly have assumed to be dead long before -that time. The judgment itself followed. The Philistines and Arabians -invaded Judah, captured Jerusalem, and murdered all Jehoram's own -children, except Ahaziah, who was the youngest. Then Jehoram, at the -age of thirty-eight, was smitten with an incurable disease of the -bowels, of which he died two years later, and not only died -unlamented, but was refused burial in the sepulchres of the kings. In -any case his reign and that of his son and successor were the most -miserable in the annals of Judah, as the reigns of their namesakes and -kinsmen, Ahaziah ben-Ahab and Jehoram ben-Ahab, were also the most -miserable in the annals of Israel. - -Jehoram was succeeded on the throne of Judah by his son Ahaziah. If -the chronology and the facts be correct, Ahaziah ben-Jehoram of Judah -must have been born when his father was only eighteen, though he was -the youngest of the king's sons, and so escaped from being massacred -in the Philistine invasion. He succeeded at the age of twenty-two, -and only reigned a single year. During this year his mother, the -Gebirah Athaliah, the daughter of Ahab and Jezebel, and granddaughter -of the Tyrian Ethbaal, was all-supreme. She bent the weak nature of -her son to still further apostasies. She was "his counsellor to do -wickedly," and her Baal-priest Mattan was more important than the -Aaronic high priest of the despised and desecrated Temple. Never did -Judah sink to so low a level, and it was well that the days of Ahaziah -of Judah were cut short. - -The only event in his reign was the share he took with his uncle -Jehoram of Israel in his campaign to protect Ramoth-Gilead from -Hazael. The expedition seems to have been successful in its main -purpose. Ramoth-Gilead, the key to the districts of Argob and Bashan, -was of immense importance for commanding the country beyond Jordan. It -seems to be the same as Ramath-Mizpeh (Josh. xiii. 26); and if so, it -was the spot where Jacob made his covenant with Laban. Ahab, or his -successors, in spite of the disastrous end of the expedition to Ahab -personally, had evidently recovered the frontier fortress from the -Syrian king.[148] Its position upon a hill made its possession vital -to the interests of Gilead; for the master of Ramah was the master of -that Trans-Jordanic district. But Hazael had succeeded his murdered -master, and was already beginning to fulfil the ruthless mission which -Elisha had foreseen with tears. Jehoram ben-Ahab seems to have held -his own against Hazael for a time; but in the course of the campaign -at Ramoth he was so severely wounded that he was compelled to leave -his army under the command of Jehu, and to return to Jezreel, to be -healed of his wounds. Thither his nephew Ahaziah of Judah went to -visit him; and there, as we shall hear, he too met his doom. That -fate, the Chronicler tells us, was the penalty of his iniquities. "The -destruction of Ahaziah was of God by coming to Joram." - -We have no ground for accusing either king of any want of courage; yet -it was obviously impolitic of Jehoram to linger unnecessarily in his -luxurious capital, while the army of Israel was engaged in service on -a dangerous frontier. The wounds inflicted by the Syrian archers may -have been originally severe. Their arrows at this time played as -momentous a part in history as the cloth-yard shafts of our English -bowmen which "sewed the French ranks together" at Poictiers, Crecy, -and Azincour. But Jehoram had at any rate so far recovered that he -could ride in his chariot; and if he had been wise and bravely -vigorous, he would not have left his army under a subordinate at so -perilous an epoch, and menaced by so resolute a foe. Or if he were -indeed compelled to consult the better physicians at Jezreel, he -should have persuaded his nephew Ahaziah of Judah--who seems to have -been more or less of a vassal as well as a kinsman--to keep an eye on -the beleaguered fort. Both kings, however, deserted their -post,--Jehoram to recover perfect health; and Ahaziah, who had been -his comrade--as their father and grandfather had gone together to the -same war--to pay a state visit of condolence to the royal invalid. The -army was left under a popular, resolute, and wholly unscrupulous -commander, and the results powerfully affected the immediate and the -ultimate destiny of both kingdoms. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[141] The following genealogy may help to elucidate the troublesome -identity of names:-- - - OMRI - ____|____ - | | JEHOSHAPHAT - Ahab = Jezebel | - _______|__________________ | - | | | | - Ahaziah Jehoram Athaliah = Jehoram - (of Israel). (of Israel). | (of Judah). - | - Ahaziah - (of Judah). - - -[142] Jotham ben-Uzziah was not the colleague of his father, but his -public representative. - -[143] The only other king of Judah whose mother's name is not -mentioned (perhaps because his father Jotham had but one wife) is -Ahaz. - -[144] 2 Kings xi. 18; 2 Chron. xxi. 11, xxiv. 7. - -[145] Vulg., _Seira_; Arab., _Sa'ir_ (but the historian never uses the -name Mount Seir); LXX., [Greek: Sior]. There is perhaps some -corruption in the text, and the reading of the Chronicler "with his -princes" shows that it may have once been [Hebrew: tzam-sarav]. - -[146] 2 Kings viii. 21. "The people" (_i.e._, the army of Judah) "fled -to their tents." Apparently this means that they slunk away home. The -word "tents" is a reminiscence of their nomad days, like the -treasonable cry, "To your tents, O Israel." - -[147] Josh. x. 29-39. - -[148] Jos., _Antt._, IX. vi. 1. - - - - - CHAPTER XI - - _THE REVOLT OF JEHU_ - - B.C. 842 - - 2 KINGS ix. 1-37 - - "Te semper anteit saeva Necessitas - Clavos trabales et cuneos manu, - Gestans ahena." - HORAT., _Od._, I. xxxv. 17. - - -A long period had elapsed since Elijah had received the triple -commission which was to mark the close of his career. Two of those -Divine behests had now been accomplished. He had anointed Elisha, son -of Shaphat, of Abel-Meholah, to be prophet in his room;[149] and -Elisha had anointed Hazael to be king over Syria;[150] the third and -more dangerous commission, involving nothing less than the overthrow -of the mighty dynasty of Omri, remained still unaccomplished. - -If the name of Jehu ("Jehovah is He")[151] had been actually mentioned -to Elijah, the dreadful secret must have remained buried in the breast -of the prophet and in that of his successor for many years. Further, -Jehu was yet a very young man, and to have marked him out as the -founder of a dynasty would have been to doom him to certain -destruction. An Eastern king, whose family has once securely seated -itself on the throne, is hedged round with an awful divinity, and -demands an unquestioning obedience. Elijah had been removed from earth -before this task had been fulfilled, and Elisha had to wait for his -opportunity. But the doom was passed, though the judgment was belated. -The sons of Ahab were left a space to repent, or to fill to the brim -the cup of their father's iniquities. - - "The sword of Heaven is not in haste to smite, - Nor yet doth linger." - -Ahaziah, Ahab's eldest son, after a reign of one year, marked only by -crimes and misfortunes, had ended in overwhelming disaster his -deplorable career. His brother Jehoram had succeeded him, and had now -been on the throne for at least twelve years, which had been chiefly -signalised by that unsuccessful attempt to recover the territory of -revolted Moab, to which we owe the celebrated Stone of Mesha. We have -already narrated the result of the campaign which had so many -vicissitudes. The combined armies of Israel, Judah, and Edom had been -delivered by the interposition of Elisha from perishing of thirst -beside the scorched-up bed of the Wady-el-Ahsy; and availing -themselves of the rash assault of the Moabites, had swept everything -before them. But Moab stood at bay at Kir-Haraseth (Kerak), his -strongest fortress, six miles from Ar or Rabbah, and ten miles east of -the southern end of the Dead Sea. It stood three thousand feet above -the level of the sea, and is defended by a network of steep valleys. -Nevertheless, Israel would have subdued it, but for the act of -horrible despair to which the King of Moab resorted in his extremity, -by offering up his eldest son as a burnt-offering to Chemosh upon the -wall of the city. Horror-stricken by the catastrophe, and terrified -with the dread that the vengeance of Chemosh could not but be aroused -by so tremendous a sacrifice, the besieging host had retired. From -that moment Moab had not only been free, but assumed the _role_ of an -aggressor, and sent her marauding bands to harry and carry the farms -and homesteads of her former conqueror.[152] - -Then followed the aggressions of Benhadad which had been frustrated by -the insight of Elisha, and which owed their temporary cessation to his -generosity.[153] The reappearance of the Syrians in the field had -reduced Samaria to the lowest depths of ghastly famine. But the day of -the guilty city had not yet come, and a sudden panic, caused among the -invaders by a rumoured assault of Hittites and Egyptians, had saved -her from destruction.[154] Taking advantage of the respite caused by -the change of the Syrian dynasty, and pressing on his advantage, -Jehoram, with the aid of his Judaean nephew, had once more got -possession of Ramoth-Gilead before Hazael was secure on the throne -which he had usurped. - -This then was the situation:--The allied and kindred kings of Israel -and Judah were idling in the pomp of hospitality at Jezreel; their -armies were encamped about Ramoth-Gilead; and at the head of the host -of Israel was the crafty and vehement grandson of Nimshi. - -Elisha saw and seized his opportunity. The day of vengeance from the -Lord had dawned. Things had not materially altered since the days of -Ahab. If Jehovah was nominally worshipped, if the very names of the -kings of Israel bore witness to His supremacy,[155] Baal was -worshipped too. The curse which Elijah had pronounced against Ahab and -his house remained unfulfilled. The credit of prophecy was at stake. -The blood of Naboth and his slaughtered sons cried to the Lord from -the ground; and hitherto it seemed to have cried in vain. If the -_Nebiim_ (the prophetic class) were to have their due weight in -Israel, the hour had come, and the man was ready. - -The light which falls on Elisha is dim and intermittent. His name is -surrounded by a halo of nebulous wonders, of which many are of a -private and personal character. But he was a known enemy of Ahab and -his house. He had, indeed, more than once interposed to snatch them -from ruin, as in the expedition against Moab, and in the awful straits -of the siege of Samaria by the Syrians. But his person had none the -less been hateful to the sons of Jezebel, and his life had been -endangered by their bursts of sudden fury. He could hardly again have -a chance so favourable as that which now offered itself, when the -armed host was at one place and the king at another. Perhaps, too, he -may have been made aware that the soldiers were not well pleased to -find at their head a king who was so far a _faineant_ as to leave them -exposed to a powerful enemy, and show no eagerness to return. His -"urgent private affairs" were not so urgent as to entitle him to take -his ease at luxurious Jezreel. - -Where Elisha was at the time we do not know--perhaps at Dothan, -perhaps at Samaria. Suddenly he called to him a youth--one of the Sons -of the Prophets, on whose speed and courage he could rely--placed in -his hands a vial of the consecrated anointing oil,[156] told him to -gird up his loins,[157] and to speed across the Jordan to -Ramoth-Gilead. When he arrived, he was to bid Jehu rise up from the -company of his fellow-captains to hurry him into "a chamber within a -chamber,"[158] to shut the door for secrecy, to pour the consecrating -oil upon his head, to anoint him King of Israel in the name of -Jehovah, and then to fly without a moment's delay.[159] - -The messenger--the Rabbis guess that he was Jonah, the son of -Amittai[160]--knew well that his was a service of immense peril, in -which his life might easily pay the forfeit of his temerity. How was -he to guess that at once, without striking a blow, the host of Israel -would fling to the winds its sworn allegiance to the son of the -warrior Ahab, the fourth monarch of the powerful dynasty of Omri? -Might not any one of a thousand possible accidents thwart a conspiracy -of which the success depended on the unflinching courage and -promptitude of his single hand? - -He was but a youth, but he was the trained pupil of a master who had, -again and again, stood before kings, and not been afraid. He sprang -from a community which inherited the splendid traditions of the -Prophet of Flame. - -He did not hesitate a moment. He tightened the camel's hide round his -naked limbs, flung back the long dark locks of the Nazarite, and sped -upon his way. A true son of the schools of Jehovah's prophets has, and -can have, no fear of man. The armies of Israel and Judah saw the wild, -flying figure of a young man, with his hairy garment and streaming -locks, rush through the camp. Whatever might be their surmisings, he -brooked no questions. Availing himself of the awe with which the -shadow of Elijah had covered the sacrosanct person of a prophetic -messenger, he made his way straight to the war-council of the -captains; and brushing aside every attempt to impede his progress with -the plea that he was the bearer of Jehovah's message, he burst into -the council of the astonished warriors, who were assembled in the -private courtyard of a house in the fortress-town.[161] - -He knew the fame of Jehu, but did not know his person, and dared not -waste time. "I have an errand to thee, O captain," he said to the -assembly generally. The message had been addressed to no one in -particular, and Jehu naturally asked, "Unto which of all of us?" With -the same swift intuition which has often enabled men in similar -circumstances to recognise a leader--as Josephus recognised Vespasian, -and St. Severinus recognised Odoacer, and Joan of Arc recognised -Charles VI. of France--he at once replied, "To thee, O captain." Jehu -did not hesitate a moment. Prophets had shown, many a time, that their -messages might not be neglected or despised. He rose, and followed the -youth, who led him into the most secret recess of the house, and -there, emptying on his head the fragrant oil of consecration, said, -"Thus saith Jehovah, God of Israel, I have anointed thee king over -the people of Jehovah, even over Israel."[162] He was to smite the -house of his master Ahab in vengeance for the blood of Jehovah's -prophets and servants whom Jezebel had murdered. Ahab's house, every -male of it, young and old, bond and free,[163] is doomed to perish, as -the houses of Jeroboam and of Baasha had perished before them, by a -bloody end. Further, the dogs should eat Jezebel by the rampart of -Jezreel,[164] and there should be none to bury her. - -One moment sufficed for his daring deed, for his burning message; the -next he had flung open the door and fled. The soldiers of the camp must -have whispered still more anxiously together as they saw the same -agitated youth rushing through their lines with the same impetuosity -which had marked his entrance. In those dark days the sudden appearance -of a prophet was usually the herald of some terrific storm.[165] - -Jehu was utterly taken by surprise; but according to the reading -preserved by Ephraem Syrus in 2 Kings ix. 26, he had on the previous -night seen in a dream the blood of Naboth and his sons. If the thought -of revolt had ever passed for a moment through his mind, it had never -assumed a definite shape. True, he had been a warrior from his youth. -True, he had been one of Ahab's bodyguard, and had ridden before him -in a chariot at least twenty years earlier, and had now risen by -valour and capacity to the high station of captain of the host. True, -also, that he had heard the great curse which Elijah had pronounced on -Ahab at the door of Naboth's vineyard; but he heard it while he was -yet an obscure youth, and he had little dreamed that his was the hand -which should carry it into execution. Who was he? And had not the -house of Omri been, in some sense, sanctioned by Heaven? And were not -the words of the prophet "wild and wandering cries," of which the -issues might be averted by such a repentance as that of Ahab? - -And he felt another misgiving. Might not this scene be the plot of -some secret enemy? Might it not at any rate be a reckless jest palmed -upon him by his comrades? If any jealous member of the confederacy of -captains betrayed the fact that Jehu had tampered with their -allegiance, would his head be safe for a single hour? He would act -warily. He came back to his fellow-captains and said nothing. - -But they were burning with curiosity. Something must be impending. -Prophets did not rush in thus tumultuously for no purpose. Must not -the youth's mantle of hair be some standard of war? - -"Is all right?" they shouted. "Why did this frantic fellow come to -thee?"[166] - -"You know all about it," answered Jehu, with wary coolness. "You know -more about it than I do. You know the man, and what his talk was." - -"Lies!" bluntly answered the rough soldiers.[167] "Tell us now." - -Then Jehu's eye took measure of them and their feelings. A judge of -men and of men's countenances, he saw conspiracy flashing in their -faces. He saw that they suspected the true state of things, and were -on fire to carry it out. Perhaps they had caught sight of the vial of -oil under the youth's scant dress. Could any quickened observation at -least fail to notice that the soldier's dark locks were shining and -fragrant, as they had not been a moment ago, with consecrated oil? - -Then Jehu frankly told them the perilous secret. Thus and thus had the -young prophet spoken, and had said, "Thus saith Jehovah, I have -anointed thee king over Israel." - -The message was met with a shout of answering approbation. That shout -was the death-knell of the house of Omri. It showed that the reigning -dynasty had utterly forfeited its popularity. No luck had followed the -sons of Naboth's murderer. Israel was weary of their mother Jezebel. -Why was this king Jehoram, this king of evil auspices, who had been -repudiated by Moab and harried by Syria--why, in the first gleam of -possible prosperity, was he being detained at Jezreel by wounds which -rumour said were already sufficiently healed to allow him to return to -his post? Down with the seed of the murderer and the sorceress! Let -brave Jehu be king, as Jehovah has said! - -So the captains sprang to their feet, and then and there seized Jehu, -and carried him in triumph to the top of the stairs which ran round -the inside of the courtyard, and stripped off their mantles to -extemporise for him the semblance of a cushioned throne.[168] Then in -the presence of such soldiers as they could trust they blew a sudden -blast of the ram's horn, and shouted, "Jehu is king!" - -Jehu was not the man to let the grass grow under his feet. Nothing -tries a man's vigour and nerve so surely as a sudden crisis. It is -this swift resolution which has raised many a man to the throne, as it -raised Otho, and Napoleon I. and Napoleon III. The history of Israel -is specially full of _coups d'etat_, but no one of them is half so -decisive or overwhelming as this. Jehu instantly accepted the office -of Jehovah's avenger on the house of Ahab.[169] Everything, as Jehu -saw, depended on the suddenness and fury with which the blow was -delivered. "If you want me to be your king,"[170] he said, "keep the -lines secure, and guard the fortress walls. I will be my own messenger -to Jehoram. Let no deserter go forth to give him warning."[171] - -It was agreed; and Jehu, only taking with him Bidkar, his -fellow-officer, and a small band of followers, set forth at full speed -from Ramoth-Gilead. - -The fortress of Ramoth, now the important town of Es-Salt, a place -which must always have been the key of Gilead, was built on the -summit of a rocky headland, fortified by nature as well as by art. It -is south of the river Jabbok, and lies at the head of the only easy -road which runs down westward to the Jordan and eastward to the rich -plateau of the interior.[172] Crossing the fords of the Jordan, Jehu -would soon be able to join the main road, which, passing Tirzah, -Zaretan, and Beth-shean, and sweeping eastward of Mount Gilboa, gives -ready access to Jezreel. - -The watchman on the lofty watchtower of the summer palace caught sight -of a storm of dust careering along from the eastward up the valley -towards the city.[173] The times were wild and troublous. What could -it be? He shouted his alarm, "I see a troop!" The tidings were -startling, and the king was instantly informed that chariots and -horsemen were approaching the royal city. "Send a horseman to meet -them," he said, "with the message, 'Is all well?'" - -Forth flew the rider, and cried to the rushing escort, "The king asks, -'Is all well? Is it peace?'" For probably the anxious city hoped that -there might have been some victory of the army against Hazael, which -would fill them with joy. - -"What hast thou to do with peace? Turn thee behind me," answered Jehu; -and perforce the horseman, whatever may have been his conjectures, had -to follow in the rear. - -"He reached them," cried the sentry on the watchtower, "but he does -not return." - -The news was enigmatical and alarming; and the troubled king sent -another horseman. Again the same colloquy occurred, and again the -watchman gave the ominous message, adding to it the yet more -perplexing news that, in the mad and headlong driving[174] of the -charioteer, he recognises the driving of Jehu, the son of Nimshi.[175] - -What had happened to his army? Why should the captain of the host be -driving thus furiously to Jezreel? - -Matters were evidently very critical, whatever the swift approach of -chariots and horsemen might portend. "Yoke my chariot," said Jehoram; -and his nephew Ahaziah, who had shared his campaign, and was no less -consumed with anxiety to learn tidings which could not but be -pressing, rode by him in another chariot to meet Jehu. They took with -them no escort worth mentioning. The rebellion was not only sudden, -but wholly unexpected. - -The two kings met Jehu in a spot of the darkest omen. It was the plot -of ground which had once been the vineyard of Naboth, at the door of -which Ahab had heard from Elijah the awful message of his doom. As the -New Forest was ominous to our early Norman kings as the witness of -their cruelties and encroachments, so was this spot to the house of -Omri, though it was adjacent to their ivory palace, and had been -transformed from a vineyard into a garden or pleasance. - -"Is it peace, Jehu?" shouted the agitated king; by which probably he -only meant to ask, "Is all going well in the army at Ramoth?" - -The fierce answer which burst from the lips of his general fatally -undeceived him. "What peace," brutally answered the rebel, "so long as -the whoredoms of thy mother Jezebel and her witchcrafts are so many?" -She, after all, was the _fons et origo mali_ to the house of Jehoram. -Hers was the dark spirit of murder and idolatry which had walked in that -house. She was the instigator and the executer of the crime against -Naboth. She had been the foundress of Baal- and Asherah-worship; she was -the murderess of the prophets; she had been specially marked out for -vengeance in the doom pronounced both by Elijah and Elisha. - -The answer was unmistakable. This was a revolt, a revolution. -"Treachery, Ahaziah!" shouted the terrified king, and instantly wheeled -round his chariot to flee.[176] But not so swiftly as to escape the -Nemesis which had been stealing upon him with leaden feet, but now smote -him irretrievably with iron hand. Without an instant's hesitation, Jehu -snatched his bow from his attendant charioteer, "filled his hands with -it," and from its full stretch and resonant string sped the arrow, which -smote Jehoram in the back with fatal force, and passed through his -heart.[177] Without a word the unhappy king sank down upon his -knees[178] in his chariot, and fell face forward, dead. - -"Take him up," cried Jehu to Bidkar,[179] "and fling him down where he -is,--here in this portion of the field of Naboth the Jezreelite. Here, -years ago, you and I, as we rode behind Ahab,[180] heard Elijah utter -his oracle on this man's father, that vengeance should meet him here. -Where the dogs licked the blood of Naboth and his sons, let dogs lick -the blood of the son of Ahab."[181] - -But Jehu was not the man to let the king's murder stay his -chariot-wheels when more work had yet to be done. Ahaziah of Judah, -too, belonged to Ahab's house, for he was Ahab's grandson, and -Jehoram's nephew and ally. Without stopping to mourn or avenge the -tragedy of his uncle's murder, Ahaziah fled towards Bethgan or -Engannim,[182] the fountain of gardens, south of Jezreel, on the road -to Samaria and Jerusalem. Jehu gave the laconic order, "Smite him -also";[183] but fright added wings to the speed of the hapless King of -Judah. His chariot-steeds were royal steeds, and were fresh; those of -Jehu were spent with the long, fierce drive from Ramoth. He got as far -as the ascent of Gur before he was overtaken.[184] There, not far from -Ibleam, the rocky hill impeded his flight, and he was wounded by the -pursuers. But he managed to struggle onwards to Megiddo, on the south -of the plain of Jezreel, and there he hid himself.[185] He was -discovered, dragged out, and slain. Even Jehu's fierce emissaries did -not make war on dead bodies, any more than Hannibal did, or Charles V. -They left such meanness to Jehu himself, and to our Charles II. They -did not interfere with the dead king's remains. His servants carried -them to Jerusalem, and there he was buried with his fathers in the -sepulchre of the kings, in the city of David. As there was nothing -more to tell about him, the historian omits the usual formula about -the rest of the acts of Ahaziah, and all that he did. His death -illustrates the proverb _Mitgegangen mitgefangen_: he was the comrade -of evil men, and he perished with them. - -Jehu speedily reached Jezreel, but the interposition of Jehoram and -the orders for the pursuit of Ahaziah had caused a brief delay, and -Jezebel had already been made aware that her doom was imminent. - -Not even the sudden and dreadful death of her son, and the nearness of -her own fate, daunted the steely heart of the Tyrian sorceress. If she -was to die, she would meet death like a queen. As though for some -Court banquet, she painted her eyelashes and eyebrows with antimony, -to make her eyes look large and lustrous,[186] and put on her jewelled -head-dress.[187] Then she mounted the palace tower, and, looking down -through the lattice above the city gate, watched the thundering -advance of Jehu's chariot, and hailed the triumphant usurper with the -bitterest insult she could devise. She knew that Omri, her husband's -father, had taken swift vengeance on the guilt of the usurper Zimri, -who had been forced to burn himself in the harem at Tirzah after one -month's troubled reign. Her shrill voice was heard above the roar of -the chariot-wheels in the ominous taunt,-- - -"Is it peace, thou Zimri, thou murderer of thy master?"[188] - -No!--She meant, "There is no peace for thee nor thine, any more than for -me or mine! Thou mayest murder us; but thee too, thy doom awaiteth!" - -Stung by the ill-omened words, Jehu looked up at her and shouted,-- - -"Who is on my side? Who?" - -The palace was apparently rife with traitors. Ahab had been the first -polygamist among the kings of Israel, and therefore the first also to -introduce the odious atrocity of eunuchs. Those hapless wretches, the -portents of Eastern seraglios, the disgrace of humanity, are almost -always the retributive enemies of the societies of which they are the -helpless victims. Fidelity or gratitude are rarely to be looked for -from natures warped into malignity by the ruthless misdoing of men. -Nor was the nature of Jezebel one to inspire affection. One or two -eunuchs[189] immediately thrust out of the windows their bloated and -beardless faces. "Fling her down!" Jehu shouted. Down they flung the -wretched queen (has any queen ever died a death so shamelessly -ignominious?), and her blood spirted upon the wall, and on the horses. -Jehu, who had only stopped for an instant in his headlong rush, drove -his horses over her corpse,[190] and entered the gate of her capital -with his wheels crimson with her blood. History records scarcely -another instance of such a scene, except when Tullia, a century later, -drove her chariot over the dead body of her father Servius Tullius in -the _Vicus Sceleratus_ of ancient Rome.[191] - -But what cared Jehu? Many a conqueror ere now has sat down to the -dinner prepared for his enemy; and the obsequious household of the -dead tyrants, ready to do the bidding of their new lord, ushered the -hungry man to the banquet provided for the kings whom he had slain. No -man dreamt of uttering a wail; no man thought of raising a finger for -dead Jehoram or for dead Jezebel, though they had all been under _her_ -sway for at least five-and-thirty years. "The wicked perish, and no -man regardeth." "When the wicked perish, there is shouting."[192] - -We may be startled at a revolution so sudden and so complete; yet it -is true to history. A tyrant or a cabal may oppress a nation for long -years. Their word may be thought absolute, their power irresistible. -Tyranny seems to paralyse the courage of resistance, like the fabled -head of Medusa. Remove its fascination of corruption, and men become -men, and not machines, once more. Jehu's daring woke Israel from the -lethargy which had made her tolerate the murders and enchantments of -this Baal-worshipping alien. In the same way in one week Robespierre -seemed to be an invincible autocrat; the next week his power had -crumbled into dust and ashes at a touch. - -It was not until Jehu had sated his thirst and hunger after that wild -drive, which had ended in the murder of two kings and a queen and in -his sudden elevation to a throne, that it even occurred to this new -tiger-king to ask what had become of Jezebel. But when he had eaten -and drunk, he said, "Go, see now to this cursed woman, and bury her: -for she is a king's daughter." That she had been first Princess, then -Queen, then Gebirah in Israel for nearly a full lifetime was nothing: -it was nothing to Jehu that she was a wife, and mother, and -grandmother of kings and queens both of Israel and Judah;--but she was -also the daughter of Ethbaal, the priest-king of Tyre and Sidon, and -therefore any shameful treatment of her remains might kindle trouble -from the region of Phoenicia.[193] - -But no one had taken the trouble so much as to look after the corpse -of Jezebel. The populace of Jezreel were occupied with their new king. -Where Jezebel fell, there she had been suffered to lie; and no one, -apparently, cared even to despoil her of the royal robes, now -saturated with bloodshed. Flung from the palace-tower, her body had -fallen in the open space just outside the walls--what is called "the -mounds" of an Eastern city. In the strange carelessness of sanitation -which describes as "fate" even the visitation of an avoidable -pestilence, all sorts of offal are shot into this vacant space to -fester in the tropic heat. I myself have seen the pariah dogs and the -vultures feeding on a ghastly dead horse in a ruined space within the -street of Beit-Dejun; and the dogs and the vultures--"those national -undertakers"--had done their work unbidden on the corpse of the Tyrian -queen. When men went to bury her, they only found a few dog-mumbled -bones--the skull, and the feet, and the palms of the hands.[194] They -brought the news to Jehu as he rested after his feast. It did not by -any means discompose him. He at once recognised that another -levin-bolt had fallen from the thunder-crash of Elijah's prophecy, and -he troubled himself about the matter no further. Her carcase, as the -man of God had prophesied, had become as dung upon the face of the -field, so that none could say, "This is Jezebel."[195] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[149] 1 Kings xix. 15, 16. - -[150] 2 Kings viii. 12, 13. - -[151] The name was not uncommon, 1 Chron. ii. 38, iv. 35, xii. 3. - -[152] 2 Kings xiii. 20, xxiv. 2; Jer. xlviii. - -[153] 2 Kings vi. 8-23. - -[154] 2 Kings vii. 6. - -[155] Jehoram = Jehovah is exalted. Ahaziah = Jehovah holds. - -[156] Vial (_pak_) only here and in 1 Sam. x. 1. "_The_ oil" (LXX., -[Greek: ton phakon tou elaiou]). - -[157] "His habit fit for speed _succinct_" (Milton). - -[158] Inner chamber, 1 Kings xx. 30. - -[159] Perhaps, if Elisha had gone in person, suspicion might have been -aroused. He was not more than fifty at this time, and lived -forty-three years more. - -[160] _Seder Olam_, c. 18. - -[161] It seems as though they were _inside_ the town to defend it, not -a beleaguring host outside. - -[162] The expression is remarkable, as showing how completely the -prerogative of the Chosen People was supposed to rest with the Ten -Tribes, as the most important representatives of the seed of Abraham. - -[163] "Him that is shut up, and him that is left at large in Israel" -(2 Kings ix. 8; 1 Kings xiv. 10, xvi. 3, 4). - -[164] The A.V. has, less accurately, "in the _portion_ of Jezreel." -See 1 Kings xxi. 23. Heb., [Hebrew: chelek]. The [Hebrew: cheil] of an -Eastern town is the ditch and empty space--a sort of external -_pomoerium_ around it. It is the place of offal, and the haunt of -vultures and pariah dogs. - -[165] 1 Sam. xvi. 4: "Comest thou peaceably?" - -[166] 2 Kings ix. 11, [Hebrew: hammoshunnatz] LXX., [Greek: ho -hepileptos]. Comp. ver. 20, "he driveth _furiously_" ([Hebrew: -veshinnatzvn]). - -[167] Ver. 12, a lie! ([Hebrew: sheker]). - -[168] What is meant by the _gerem_ of the staircase is uncertain. The -word means "a bone" (Aquila, [Greek: ostodes]), and is, in this -connection, an [Greek: hapax legomenon]. The Targum explains it as the -top vane of a stair-dial. The margin of the R.V. renders it "on the bare -steps." The Vulgate renders it _in similitudinem tribunalis_, as though -_gerem_ meant _tselem_. The LXX. conceal their perplexity by simply -translating the word [Greek: epi to garem]. Grotius and Clericus, _in -fastigio graduum_. Symmachus, [Greek: epi mian ton anabathmidon]. - -[169] 2 Kings ix. 14: "So Jehu _conspired_ against Joram." The same -word is used in 2 Chron. xxiv. 25, 26. - -[170] 2 Kings ix. 15, R.V.: "If this be your mind." - -[171] So far as we know, he never returned to Ramoth-Gilead, of which -indeed we hear no more. - -[172] Tristram, _Land of Moab_. - -[173] Heb., _Shiph'hath_, "a dust-storm" (LXX., [Greek: koniorton, ai. -ochlon]; Vulg., _globum_), not as in A.V. and R.V., "a company." Comp. -Isa. lx. 6; Ezek. xxvi. 10. - -[174] Clearly the rendering "he driveth furiously" is right. The word -"furiously" is _beshigga'on_ (Vulg., _praeceps_), and is connected with -"mad," ver. 11. LXX., [Greek: en parallage]. Arab. Chald., "quietly." -Josephus, "leisurely, and in good order." Such an approach would not, -however, have been at all in accordance with the perilous urgency of -his intent. - -[175] Jehu, the son of Jehoshaphat, is named from his grandfather -Nimshi, who seems to have been the founder of the greatness of his -house. - -[176] 2 Kings ix. 23: "Turned his hands." Comp. 1 Kings xxii. 34. - -[177] Ver. 24. Vulg., _inter scapulas_. - -[178] LXX., reading [Hebrew: brkav tzal]. - -[179] Bidkar, perhaps Bar-dekar, "Son of stabbing." Comp. 1 Kings iv. 9. - -[180] Heb., _ts'madim_, "in pairs"; LXX., [Greek: epibebekotes epi -zeuge]. It is uncertain whether Jehu and Bidkar were in the same -chariot as Ahab, as Josephus says ([Greek: kathezomenous opisthen tou -harmatos]), or in a separate chariot. - -[181] 2 Kings ix. 26: "Saith the Lord." Ephraem Syrus omits these -words. He says that the night before Jehu had seen the blood of Naboth -and his sons in a dream. Comp. Hom., _Od._, iii. 258: [Greek: To ke -hoi oude thanonti chyten epi gaian echeuan 'All' ara tonge kynes te -kai oionoi katedapsan Keimenon en pedio]. - -[182] A.V., "By the way of the garden-house." LXX., [Greek: Baithgan]. - -[183] The text is a little uncertain. - -[184] Thenius supposes "Gur" to mean "a caravanserai." Comp. 2 Chron. -xxvi. 7, _Gur-Baal_; Vulg., _Hospitium Baalis_. - -[185] The account of the Chronicler (2 Chron. xxii. 9) differs from -that of the earlier historian. It may, however, be (uncertainly) -reconciled with it as in the text, if we suppose the words "he was hid -in Samaria" to mean in Megiddo, in the territory of Samaria. -Obviously, however, the traditions varied. There are difficulties -about the story, for Ibleam is on the west towards Megiddo, and not -between Jezreel and Samaria. - -[186] [Hebrew: puch], "Lead-glance." A mixture of pulverised antimony -(_stibium_) and zinc is still used by women in the East for this -purpose. _In calliblepharis dilatat oculos_ (Plin., _H. N._, xxxiii.). -Keren-Happuk, the name given by Job to one of his daughters, means -"horn of stibium." The object could hardly have been to _attract_ Jehu -(as Ephraem Syrus thinks), for Jezebel had already a _grandson_ -twenty-three years old (viii. 26). - -[187] A.V., "_Tired_ her head." Comp. _tiara_. Lit., "made good"; -LXX., [Greek: egathune]. - -[188] Josephus gives the sense very well: [Greek: Kalos doulos ho -apokteinas ton despoten] (_Antt._, IX. vi. 4). The same question might -have been addressed to Baasha, Shallum, Menahem, Pekah, and Hoshea; -but at least Jehu might plead a prophet's call. - -[189] "Two or three." Lit., "two three," like the old English "two -three" for "several." - -[190] Ver. 33. Heb., "He trod her underfoot." LXX., [Greek: -Synepatesan auten]; Vulg., _Conculcaverunt eam_. - -[191] Liv., i. 46-48. - -[192] Prov. xi. 10. Compare the remark of Voltaire, who saw "le peuple -ivre de vin et de joie de la mort de Louis XIV." - -[193] 1 Kings xvi. 31. At this time Ethbaal was dead. He reigned -probably from B.C. 940-908, and died at the age of sixty-eight (Jos., -_Antt._, VIII. xiii. 1, IX. vi. 6; _c. Ap._, i. 18). - -[194] 1 Kings xxi. 23. - -[195] Comp. Psalm lxxxiii. 10. Her name remained a by-word till the -latest days (Rev. ii. 20), and the Spanish Jews called their -persecutress Isabella the Catholic "Jezebel." - - - - - CHAPTER XII - - _JEHU ESTABLISHED ON THE THRONE_ - - B.C. 842-814 - - 2 KINGS x. 1-17 - - "The devil can quote Scripture for his purpose." - SHAKESPEARE. - - -But the work of Jehu was not yet over. He was established at Jezreel; -he was lord of the palace and seraglio of his master; the army of -Israel was with him. But who could be sure that no civil war would -arise, as between the partisans of Zimri and Omri, as between Omri and -Tibni? Ahab, first of the kings of Israel, had left many sons. There -were no less than seventy of these princes at Samaria. Might there not -be among them some youth of greater courage and capacity than the -murdered Jehoram? And could it be anticipated that the late dynasty -was so utterly unfortunate and execrated as to have none left to do -them reverence, or to strike one blow on their behalf, after more than -half a century of undisputed sway?[196] Jehu's _coup de main_ had been -brilliantly successful. In one day he had leapt into the throne. But -Samaria was strong upon its watch-tower hill. It was full of Ahab's -sons, and had not yet declared on Jehu's side. It might be expected -to feel some gratitude to the dynasty which Jehu had supplanted, -seeing that it owed to the grandfather of the king whom he had just -slain its very existence as the capital of Israel. - -He would put a bold face on his usurpation, and strike while the iron -was hot. He would not rouse opposition by seeming to assume that -Samaria would accept his rebellion. He therefore wrote a letter to the -rulers of Samaria[197]--which was but a journey of nine hours' -distance from Jezreel--and to the guardians of the young princes, -reminding them that they were masters in a strong city, protected with -its own contingent of chariots and horses, and well supplied with -armour. He suggested that they should select the most promising of -Ahab's sons, make him king, and begin a civil war on his behalf. - -The event showed how prudent was this line of conduct. As yet Jehu had -not transferred the army from Ramoth-Gilead. He had doubtless taken -good care to prevent intelligence of his plans from reaching the -adherents of Jehoram in Samaria. To them the unknown was the terrible. -All they knew was that "Behold, two kings stood not before him!" The -army must have sanctioned his revolt: what chance had they? As for -loyalty and affection, if ever they had existed towards this hapless -dynasty, they had vanished like a dream. The people of Samaria and -Jezreel had once been obedient as sheep to the iron dominance of -Jezebel. They had tolerated her idol-abominations, and the insolence -of her army of dark-browed priests. They had not risen to defend the -prophets of Jehovah, and had suffered even Elijah, twice over, to be -forced to flee for his life. They had borne, hitherto without a -murmur, the tragedies, the sieges, the famines, the humiliations, with -which during these reigns they had been familiar. And was not Jehovah -against the waning fortunes of the Beni-Omri? Elijah had undoubtedly -cursed them, and now the curse was falling. Jehu must doubtless have -let it be known that he was only carrying out the behest of their own -citizen the great Elisha, who had sent to him the anointing oil. They -could find abundant excuses to justify their defection from the old -house, and they sent to the terrible man a message of almost abject -submission:--Let him do as he would; they would make no king: they -were his servants, and would do his bidding. - -Jehu was not likely to be content with verbal or even written -promises. He determined, with cynical subtlety, to make them put a -very bloody sign-manual to their treaty, by implicating them -irrevocably in his rebellion. He wrote them a second mandate. - -"If," he said, "ye accept my rule, prove it by your obedience. Cut off -the heads of your master's sons, and see that they are brought to me -here to-morrow by yourselves before the evening." - -The ruthless order was fulfilled to the letter by the terrified -traitors. The king's sons were with their tutors, the lords of the city. -On the very morning that Jehu's second missive arrived, every one of -these poor guiltless youths was unceremoniously beheaded. The hideous, -bleeding trophies were packed in fig-baskets and sent to Jezreel.[198] - -When Jehu was informed of this revolting present it was evening, and he -was sitting at a meal with his friends.[199] He did not trouble himself -to rise from his feast or to look at "death made proud by pure and -princely beauty." He knew that those seventy heads could only be the -heads of the royal youths. He issued a cool and brutal order that they -should be piled in two heaps[200] until the morning on either side the -entrance of the city gates. Were they watched? or were the dogs and -vultures and hyaenas again left to do their work upon them? We do not -know. In any case it was a scene of brutal barbarism such as might have -been witnessed in living memory in Khiva or Bokhara;[201] nor must we -forget that even in the last century the heads of the brave and the -noble rotted on Westminster Hall and Temple Bar, and over the Gate of -York, and over the Tolbooth at Edinburgh, and on Wexford Bridge. - -The day dawned, and all the people were gathered at the gate, which -was the scene of justice. With the calmest air imaginable the warrior -came out to them, and stood between the mangled heads of those who but -yesterday had been the pampered minions of fortune and luxury. His -speech was short and politic in its brutality. "Be yourselves the -judges," he said. "Ye are righteous. Jezebel called me a Zimri. Yes! I -conspired against my master and slew him: but"--and here he casually -pointed to the horrible, bleeding heaps--"who smote all these?" The -people of Jezreel and the lords of Samaria were not only passive -witnesses of his rebellion; they were active sharers in it. They had -dabbled their hands in the same blood. Now they could not choose but -accept his dynasty: for who was there besides himself? And then, -changing his tone, he does not offer "the tyrant's devilish plea, -necessity," to cloak his atrocities, but--like a Romish inquisitor of -Seville or Granada--claims Divine sanction for his sanguinary -violence. This was not _his_ doing. He was but an instrument in the -hands of fate. Jehovah is alone responsible. He is doing what He spake -by His servant Elijah. Yes! and there was yet more to do; for no word -of Jehovah's shall fall to the ground. - -With the same cynical ruthlessness, and cold indifference to smearing -his robes in the blood of the slain, he carried out to the bitter end -his task of policy which he gilded with the name of Divine justice. -Not content with slaying Ahab's sons, he set himself to extirpate his -race, and slew all who remained to him in Jezreel, not only his kith -and kin, but every lord and every Baal-priest who favoured his house, -until he left him none remaining. - -But what a frightful picture do these scenes furnish us of the state -of religion and even of civilisation in Jezreel! There was this -man-eating tiger of a king wallowing in the blood of princes, and -enacting scenes which remind us of Dahomey and Ashantee, or of some -Tartary khanate where human hands are told out in the market-place -after some avenging raid. And amid all this savagery, squalor, and -Turkish atrocity, the man pleads the sanction of Jehovah, and claims, -unrebuked, that he is only carrying out the behests of Jehovah's -prophets! It is not until long afterwards that the voice of a prophet -is heard repudiating his plea and denouncing his bloodthirstiness. - - "An evil soul producing holy witness - Is like a villain with a smiling cheek-- - A goodly apple rotten at the core." - - -FOOTNOTES: - -[196] Omri, 12 years; Ahab, 22; Ahaziah, 18; Jehoram, 12. - -[197] The reading of 2 Kings x. 1, "Unto the rulers of _Jezreel_," is -clearly wrong. The LXX. reads, "Unto the rulers of Samaria." Unless -"Jezreel" be a clerical error for Israel, we must read, "He sent -letters from Jezreel unto the rulers of Samaria." - -[198] Fig-baskets, Jer. xxiv. 2. The word _dudim_ is rendered "pots" -in 1 Sam. ii. 14. LXX., [Greek: en kartallois]; Vulg., _in cophinis_. -In Psalm lxxxi. 6 the LXX. has [Greek: en to kophino]. - -[199] Jos., _Antt._, IX. vi. 5. - -[200] Heb., _Tsibourim_; LXX., [Greek: bounous]. - -[201] Comp. 1 Sam. xvii. 54; 2 Macc. xv. 30. - -[202] Hos. i. 4. - - - - - CHAPTER XIII - - _FRESH MURDERS--THE EXTIRPATION OF BAAL-WORSHIP_ - (B.C. 842) - - 2 KINGS x. 12-28 - - "Jehu, sur les hauts lieux, enfin osant offrir - Un temeraire encens que Dieu ne peut souffrir, - N'a pour servir sa cause et venger ses injures - Ni le coeur assez droit, ni les mains assez pures." - RACINE. - - -After such abject subservience had been shown him by the lords of -Samaria and Jezreel, Jehu evidently had no further shadow of -apprehension. He seems to have loved blood for its own sake--to have -been seized by a vertigo of blood-poisoning. Having waded through -slaughter to a throne, he loved to wash his footsteps in the blood of -the slain, and to stretch to the very uttermost--to stretch until it -cracked all its ravelled threads--the Divine sanction claimed by his -fanaticism or his hypocrisy. - -When he had finished his massacres at Jezreel, he went to Samaria. It -was only a journey of a few hours. On the high road he met a company -of travellers, whose escort and rich apparel showed that they were -persons of importance. They were about to halt, perhaps for -refreshment, at the shearing-house of the shepherds--the place in -which the sheep were gathered before they were shorn.[203] - -"Who are ye?" he asked. - -They answered that they were princes of the house of Judah, the brethren -of Ahaziah,[204] on their way to see the two kings at Jezreel, and to -salute their cousins, the children of Jehoram, and their kinsfolk the -children of Jezebel the Gebirah.[205] The answer sealed their fate. Jehu -ordered his followers to take them alive. At first he had not decided -what he would do with them. But half measures had now become impossible. -This cavalcade of princes little knew that they were on their way to -greet the dead children of a dead king and a dead queen. Jehu felt that -the possibilities of an endless _vendetta_ must be quenched in blood. He -gave orders to slay them, and there in one hour forty-two more scions of -the royal houses of Judah and Israel were done to death.[206] With the -usual reckless insouciance of the East, where any tank or well is made -the natural receptacle for corpses regardless of ultimate consequences, -their bodies were flung into the cistern of the shearing-house, in which -the sheep were washed before shearing, just as the bodies of Gedaliah's -followers were flung by Ishmael into the well at Mizpah, and the bodies -of our own murdered countrymen were flung into the well of Cawnpore. He -did not leave one of them alive. - -Thus Jehu "murdered two kings, and one hundred and twelve princes, and -gave Queen Jezebel to dogs to eat; and if priests had but noticed how -even Hosea condemns and denounces his savagery, they would have -abstained from some of their glorifications of assassins and butchers, -nor would they have appealed to this man's hideous example, as they -have done, to excuse some of their own revolting atrocities."[207] But - - "Crime was ne'er so black - As ghostly cheer and pious thanks to lack. - Satan is modest. At heaven's door he lays - His evil offspring, and in Scriptural phrase - And saintly posture gives to God the praise - And honour of his monstrous progeny."[208] - -One cruel deed more or less was nothing to Jehu. Leaving this tank -choked with death and incarnadined with royal blood, he went on his way -as if nothing particular had happened. He had not proceeded far when he -saw a man well known to him, and of a spirit kindred to his own. It was -the Arab ascetic and Nazarite Jehonadab, the son of Rechab (or "The -Rider"), the chief of the tribe of Kenites who had flung in their lot -with the children of Israel since the days of Moses.[209] It was the -tribe which had produced a Jael; and Jehonadab had something of the -fierce, fanatical spirit of the ancient chieftainess, who, in her own -tent, had dashed out with the tent-peg the brains of Sisera. His very -name, "The Lord is noble," indicated that he was a worshipper of -Jehovah, and his fierce zeal showed him to be a genuine Kenite. -Disgusted with the wickedness of cities, disgusted above all with the -loathly vice of drunkenness, which, as we see from the contemporary -prophets, had begun in this age to acquire fresh prominence in luxurious -and wealthy communities, he exacted of his sons a solemn oath that -neither they nor their successors would drink wine nor strong drink, and -that, shunning the squalor and corruption of cities, they would live in -tents, as their nomad ancestors had done in the days when Jethro and -Hobab were princes of pastoral Midian. We learn from Jeremiah, nearly -two and a half centuries later, how faithfully that oath had been -observed; and how, in spite of all temptation, the vow of abstinence was -maintained, even when the strain of foreign invasion had driven the -Rechabites into Jerusalem from their desolated pastures.[210] - -Jehu knew that the stern fanaticism of the Kenite Emir would rejoice -in his exterminating zeal, and he recognised that the friendship and -countenance of this "good man and just," as Josephus calls him, would -add strength to his cause, and enable him to carry out his dark -design. He therefore blessed him.[211] - -"Is thine heart right with my heart, as my heart is with thy heart?" -he asked, after he had returned the greeting of Jehonadab. - -"It is, it is!" answered the vehement Rechabite.[212] - -"Then give me thy hand," he said; and grasping the Arab by the -hand,[213] he pulled him up into his chariot--the highest distinction -he could bestow upon him--and bade him come and witness his zeal for -Jehovah. - -His first task on arriving at Samaria was to tear up the last fibres of -Ahab's kith and destroy all his partisans. This was indeed to push to a -self-interested extreme the denunciation which had been pronounced upon -Ahab; but the crime helped to secure his fiercely founded throne. - -One deep-seated plot was yet unaccomplished. It was the total -extermination of Baal-worship. To drive out for ever this orgiastic, -corrupt, and alien idolatry was right; but there is nothing to show -that Jehu would have been unable to effect this purpose by one stern -decree, together with the destruction of Baal's images and temple. A -method so simply righteous did not suit this Nero-Torquemada, who -seemed to be never happy unless he united Jesuitical cunning with the -pouring out of rivers of massacre. - -He summoned the people together; and as though he now threw off all -pretence of zeal for orthodoxy, he proclaimed that Ahab had served -Baal a little, but Jehu would serve him much. The Samaritans must have -been endowed with infinite gullibility if they could suppose that the -king who had ridden into the city side by side with such a man as -Jehonadab--"the warrior in his coat of mail, the ascetic in his shirt -of hair"--who had already exhibited an unfathomable cunning, and had -swept away the Baal-priests of Jezreel, was indeed sincere in this new -conversion.[214] Perhaps they felt it dangerous to question the -sincerity of kings. The Baal-worshippers of former days were known, -and Jehu proclaimed that if any one of them was missing at the great -sacrifice which he intended to offer to Baal he should be put to -death. A solemn assembly to Baal was proclaimed, and every apostate -from God to nature-worship from all Israel was present, till the -idol's temple was thronged from end to end.[215] To add splendour to -the solemnity, Jehu bade the wardrobe-keeper to bring out all the rich -vestments of Tyrian dye and Sidonian broidery, and clothe the -worshippers.[216] Solemnly advancing to the altar with the Rechabite -by his side, he warned the assembly to see that their gathering was -not polluted by the presence of a single known worshipper of Jehovah. -Then, apparently, he still further disarmed suspicion by taking a -personal part in offering the burnt-offering. Meanwhile, he had -surrounded the temple and blocked every exit with eighty armed -warriors, and had threatened that any one of them should be put to -death if he let a single Baal-worshipper escape. When he had finished -the offering,[217] he went forth, and bade his soldiers enter, and -slay, and slay, and slay till none were left. Then flinging the -corpses in a heap, they made their way to the fortress of the Temple, -where some of the priests may have taken refuge. They dragged out and -burnt the _matstseboth_ of Baal,[218] broke down the great central -idol, and utterly dismantled the whole building. To complete the -pollution of the dishallowed shrine, he made it a common midden for -Samaria, which it continued to be for centuries afterwards.[219] It -was his last voluntary massacre. The House of Ahab was no more. -Baal-worship in Israel never survived that exterminating blow. - -Happily for the human race, such atrocities committed in the name of -religion have not been common. In Pagan history we have but few -instances, except the slaughter of the Magians at the beginning of the -reign of Darius, son of Hystaspes. Alas that other parallels should be -furnished by the abominable tyranny of a false Christianity, blessed -and incited by popes and priests! The persecutions and massacres of -the Albigenses, preached by Arnold of Citeaux, and instigated by Pope -Innocent III.; the expulsion of the Jews from Spain; the deadly work -of Torquemada; the murderous furies of Alva among the hapless -Netherlanders, urged and approved by Pope Pius V.; the massacre of -St. Bartholomew, for which Pope Gregory and his cardinals sang their -horrible Te Deum in their desecrated shrines,--these are the parallels -to the deeds of Jehu. He has found his chief imitators among the -votaries of a blood-stained and usurping sacerdotalism, which has -committed so many crimes and inflicted so many horrors on mankind. - -And did God approve all this detestable mixture of zealous enthusiasm -with lying deceit and the insatiate thirst of blood? - -If right be right, and wrong be wrong, the answer must not be an -elaborate subterfuge, but an uncompromising "No!" We need be under no -doubt on that subject. Christ Himself reproved His Apostles for savage -zealotry, and taught them that the Elijah-spirit was not the -Christ-spirit. Nor is the Elisha-spirit the Christian spirit any the -more if these deeds of hypocrisy and blood were in any sense approved -by him who is sometimes regarded as the mild and gentle Elisha. Where -was he? Why was he silent? Could he possibly approve of this -murderer's fury? We do not, indeed, know how far Elisha lent his -sanction to anything more than the general end. Ahab's house had been -doomed to vengeance by the voice which gave utterance to the verdict -of the national conscience. The doom was just; Jehu was ordained to be -the executioner. In no other way could the judgment be carried out. -The times were not sentimental. The murder of Jehoram was not regarded -as an act of tyrannicide, but of divinely commissioned justice. Elisha -_may_ have shrunk from the unreined furies of the man whom he had sent -his emissary to anoint. On the other hand, we have not the least proof -that he did so. He partook, probably, of the wild spirit of the -times, when such deeds were regarded with feelings very different from -the abhorrence with which we, better taught by the spirit of love, and -more enlightened by the widening dawn of history, now justly regard -them. No remonstrance of _contemporary_ prophecy, however faint, is -recorded as having been uttered against the doings of Jehu. The fact -that, several centuries later, they could be recorded by the historian -without a syllable of reprobation shows that the education of nations -in the lessons of righteousness is slow, and that we are still amid -the annals of the deep night of moral imperfection. But the nation was -on the eve of purer teaching, and in the prophets Amos and Hosea we -read the clear condemnation of deeds of cruelty in general, and -specially of the king who felt no pity. Amos condemns even the -idolatrous King of Edom, "because he did pursue his brother with the -sword, and did cast off all pity, and his anger did tear perpetually, -and he kept his wrath for ever."[220] He condemns no less severely the -Chemosh-worshipping King of Moab even for an insult done to the dead: -"Because he burned the bones of the King of Edom into lime."[221] Jehu -had warred pitilessly upon the living, and had shamelessly insulted -the dead. He had flung the heads of seventy princes in two bleeding -heaps on the common road for all eyes to stare upon, and he had -polluted the cistern of Beth-equed-haroim with the dead bodies of -forty-two youths of the royal house of Judah. He might plead that he -was but carrying out to the full the commission of Jehovah, imposed -upon him by Elisha; but Hosea, a century later, gives God's message -against his house: "Yet a little while, and I will avenge the blood -of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu, and will cause to cease the kingdom -of the house of Israel."[222] - -Nay, more! If, as is possible, the ghastly story of the siege of -Samaria, narrated in the memoirs of Elisha, is displaced, and if it -really belongs to the reign of Jehoahaz ben-Jehu, then Elisha himself -brands the cruelty of the rushing thunderbolt of vengeance which his -own hand had launched. For he calls the unnamed "King of Israel" "the -son of a murderer." - -Men who are swords of God, and human executioners of Divine justice, -may easily deceive themselves. God works the ends of His own -providence, and He uses their ministry. "The fierceness of man shall -turn to Thy praise, and the fierceness of them shalt Thou -refrain."[223] But they can never make their plea of prophetic -sanction a cloak of maliciousness. Cromwell had stern work to do. -Rightly or wrongly, he deemed it inevitable, and did not shrink from -it. But he hated it. Over and over again, he tells us, he had prayed -to God that He would not put him to this work. To the best of his -power he avoided, he minimised, every act of vengeance, even when the -sternness of his Puritan sense of righteousness made him look on it as -duty. Far different was the case of Jehu. He loved murder and cunning -for their own sakes, and, like Joab, he dyed the garments of peace -with the blood of war. - -How little was his gain! It had been happier for him if he had never -mounted higher than the captaincy of the host, or even so high. He -reigned for twenty-eight years (842-814)--longer than any king except -his great-grandson Jeroboam II.; and in recognition of any element of -righteousness which had actuated his revolt, his children, even to the -fourth generation, were suffered to sit upon the throne. His dynasty -lasted for one hundred and thirteen years.[224] But his own reign was -only memorable for defeat, trouble, and irreparable disaster. - -For Hazael, who had seized the throne of his murdered lord Benhadad, -was a fierce and able warrior. He held his own against the overweening -might of his northern neighbour Assyria; and whenever he obtained a -respite from this desperate warfare, he indemnified himself for all -losses by enlarging his dominion out of the territories of the Ten -Tribes. "In those days the Lord began to cut Israel short, and Hazael -smote them in all the borders of Israel." Jehu had the mortification -of seeing the fairest and most fruitful regions of his dominion, those -which had belonged to Israel from the most ancient times, wrenched out -of his grasp. From this time forwards Israel lost half the fair -Promised Land which God had given to their fathers. It was the -beginning of the end. Henceforth the tribal inheritance of Reuben, -Gad, and the half tribe of Manasseh was an oppressed dependency of -Aram. Hazael overran and annexed the land of Bashan from the spurs of -Mount Hermon to the Lake of Gennezareth; Gaulan, and volcanic Argob, -and Hauran the entire ancient kingdom of Og, King of Bashan, with all -the herds and pasture-lands. Southward of this he seized the whole -forest-clad plateau of Gilead, with its lovely ravines, north of the -Jabbok, the territory of Gad; and pushing still southward, -established his sway over the district, of the Ammonites and the tribe -of Reuben, as far as the city of Aroer, on the other side of the great -chasm of Arnon (Wady Mojib). All the fatness of Bashan and Rabbah with -her watery plain of the Beni-Ammon, and the grass-covered uplands -which fed the enormous flocks of Mesha, the great Emir and -sheep-master of Moab, passed from Israel to Syria, never to be -recovered. What made the humiliation more terrible was that the -invasion and conquest were accompanied with acts of unwonted cruelty. -Elisha had wept to think what evil Hazael would do the children of -Israel[225]--how he would set their strongholds on fire, and slay -their young men with the sword, and dash in pieces their little ones, -and rip up their women with child. These atrocities were in those -horrible days the ordinary incidents of warfare;[226] but Hazael seems -to have been pre-eminent in brutal fierceness. It was this which -called down on him and his people the "burdens" of Amos. "Thus saith -the Lord; For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four, I will -not turn away the punishment thereof; because they have threshed -Gilead with threshing instruments of iron: but I will send a fire into -the house of Hazael, which shall devour the palaces of Benhadad."[227] - -We can imagine rather than describe the anguish of Jehu when he was -compelled to look impotently on, while his powerful Syrian neighbour -laid waste his dominion with fire and sword, and the cry of his -despoiled and slaughtered subjects was uplifted to him in vain. Nor -was this all. Emboldened by these reverses, a host of other enemies, -once subjugated and despised, began to wreak their revenge and -insolence on humbled Israel. The Philistines eagerly undertook the -sale of the wretched captives who were brought to them in gangs from -the burnt Trans-Jordanic towns.[228] The old "brotherly covenant" with -the Tyrian, which had once been formed by Solomon, and had been -cemented by the marriage of Jezebel with Ahab, was cancelled by Jehu's -insults, and the Tyrians emulously outbad the Philistines in the -purchase of Israelitish slaves. The Edomites and the Ammonites also -helped Hazael in his marauding raids, and enlarged their own domains -at the expense of Samaria. Such insults and humiliations might well go -far to break the heart of an impetuous and warrior-king. - -Of Jehu the Books of Kings and Chronicles have no more to tell us, but -we gain fresh insight into his degradation from the Black Obelisk of -Shalmaneser II. (860-824), now in the British Museum. From the -inscription we find that, in 842, Jehu--"the son of Omri," as he is -erroneously called--was one of the vassal kings who subjected -themselves to the Assyrian conqueror,[229] and sent him tribute, which -may have euphemistically passed under the name of presents. The -despot of Nineveh twice speaks of it as a tribute. On this obelisk we -see a picture of Jehu's ambassadors--perhaps of Jehu himself. On the -left stands the Assyrian King with the winged circle over his head. He -holds a beaker of wine in his hand, and two eunuchs stand behind him, -one of whom covers him with a sunshade. Before him kneels and grovels -in adoration the Jewish King, with his beard sweeping the ground. In -long array behind him come his servants--first two eunuchs, then a -number of bearded figures, who carry the tribute. They are dressed in -long richly fringed robes, exactly resembling those of the Assyrians -themselves, and they wear shoes which turn up at the toes. They are -carrying figures of gold and silver, goblets, golden vessels, ingots -of precious metals, spear-shafts, a kingly sceptre, baskets, bags, and -trays of treasure, the contribution of which must have fallen with -crushing weight on the impoverished kingdom.[230] - -This tribute must have been sent in 842, the eighteenth year of -Shalmaneser II.'s reign. Doubtless Jehu thought he might be delivered -from his furious neighbour Hazael by propitiating the Northern tyrant, -who at the same time received the submission of the Tyrians and -Sidonians. But if so, Jehu's hopes were dashed to the ground. -Shalmaneser was the enemy of Hazael (Ha-sa-ilu), who had gone out to -meet him at Antilibanus, and there had fought a desperate battle. The -Syrian King was routed, and driven back, and Shalmaneser had besieged -Damascus. But he had failed to take it, and indeed had not troubled -Syria again till 832, when he made an excursion of minor importance. -His troubles on the north and east of Assyria had diverted his -attention from Damascus; and this, together with the inferiority of -his son Samsiniras (_d._ 811), had given Hazael a free hand to avenge -himself on Israel as the ally of Assyria. Of Jehu we hear no more. -After his long reign of twenty-eight years he slept with his fathers, -and was buried in Samaria, and Jehoahaz his son reigned in his stead. -Savage as had been his measures, his victory over alien idolatries was -by no means complete. What Micah calls "the statutes of Omri, and the -works of the House of Ahab,"[231] were still kept; and men, both in -Israel and Judah, walked in their old sins. Even in the reign of -Jehu's own son Jehoahaz there still remained in Samaria the Asherah, -or tree consecrated to the nature-goddess, which Jehu seems to have -put away, but not to have destroyed.[232] As he grovelled in the dust -before Shalmaneser, did no memory of his own ferocities darken his -humiliated soul? Must not he, like our Henry II., have been inclined -to utter the wailing cry, "Shame, shame on a conquered king!" - -FOOTNOTES: - -[203] 2 Kings x. 12. The shepherds House of Meeting -(_Beth-equed-haroim_). LXX., [Greek: en Baithakath]; Vulg., _ad -cameram pastorum_; Aquila, [Greek: oikos kampseos]. It has been -conjectured by Klostermann that it belonged to the Rechabites, that -they had been persecuted by Jezebel, and that they were glad to help -in taking vengeance on her descendants. - -[204] The Chronicler (2 Chron. xxii. 8) says "_sons_ of the brethren -of Ahaziah." - -[205] LXX., [Greek: he dynasteuousa]. - -[206] 2 Kings x. 14, A.V., "at the pit." Lit., "in" or "into the -cistern." - -[207] See Martin, _Hist. de France_, ix. 114. - -[208] Whittier. - -[209] Jer. xxxv. 1-19. Josephus (_Antt._, IX. vi. 6) calls him "a good -man and a just, who had long been a friend of Jehu." "He was," says -Ewald (_Gesch._, iii. 543), "of a society of those who despaired of -being able to observe true religion undisturbedly in the midst of the -nation with the stringency with which they understood it, and -therefore withdrew into the desert." - -[210] Jer. xxxv. (written about B.C. 604). Communities of Nazarites -seem to have sprung up at this epoch, perhaps as a protest against the -prevailing luxury (Amos ii. 11). - -[211] In Josephus it is Jehonadab who blesses the king. - -[212] Heb., [Hebrew: yesh vayesh]. - -[213] Striking hands was a sign of good faith (Job xvii. 3; Prov. -xxii. 26). - -[214] He did it "in subtilty" ([Hebrew: vetzakevah]). This substantive -occurs nowhere else, but is connected with the name Jacob. LXX., -[Greek: en pternismo], "in taking by the heel," with reference to the -name Jacob, "supplanter." - -[215] Lit., "mouth to mouth." LXX., [Greek: stoma eis stoma]. - -[216] Ver. 22, [Hebrew: melhahah], _Vestiarum_, occurs here only. The -LXX. omits it or puts it in Greek letters. Targum, [Greek: kamptrai], -"chests" Sil. Italicus (iii. 23) describes the robes of the priests of -the Gaditanian Hercules,-- - - "_Nec discolor ulli, - Ante aras cultus; velantur corpora lino - Et Pelusiaco praefulget stamine vertex._" - KEIL, _ad loc._ - -It was a mixture of "the rich dye of Tyre and the rich web of Nile." - -[217] The phrase may be impersonal, "when one [_i.e._, they] had -finished the sacrifice"; but the narrative seems to imply that Jehu -offered it himself (LXX., [Greek: hos synetelesan poiountes ten -holokautosin] Vulg., _cum completum esset holocaustum_). - -[218] A.V., images; R.V., pillars. - -[219] Comp. Ezra vi. 11; Dan. ii. 5. - -[220] Amos i. 11. - -[221] Amos ii. 1. - -[222] Hos. i. 4. - -[223] Psalm lxxvi. 10. - -[224] - - Jehu 842-814. - Jehoahaz 814-797. - Joash 797-781. - Jeroboam II. 781-740. - Zechariah 740. - -[225] 2 Kings viii. 12. - -[226] Isa. xiii. 11-16; Hos. x. 14, xiii. 16; Nah. iii. 10. - -[227] Amos i. 3, 4. - -[228] Amos i. 6-15. - -[229] See Appendix I., Schrader, _Keilinschriften u. das Alte Test._, -208 ff.; Sayce, _Records of the Past_, v. 41; Layard, _Nineveh_, p. -613; Rawlinson, _Herodotus_, i. 469. He is twice mentioned in -inscriptions of Shalmaneser II. (861-825). He is called Ja-hu-a, son -of Omri. The name of Omri was familiar in Nineveh; for Ahab had fought -as a vassal of Assyria at the battle of Karkar, and Samaria was called -Beth-Khumri. Shalmaneser would not trouble himself with the fact that -Jehu had extirpated the old dynasty. His black stele was found by -Layard, and is figured in _Monuments of Nineveh_, i., pl. 53. The name -of Jehu was first deciphered by Dr. Hincks in 1851. - -[230] Schrader (E. T.), ii. 199. - -[231] Mic. vi. 16. - -[232] 2 Kings xiii. 6. - - - - - CHAPTER XIV - - _ATHALIAH_ (B.C. 842-836)--_JOASH BEN-AHAZIAH OF - JUDAH_ (B.C. 836-796) - - 2 KINGS xi. 1-xii. 21 - - "Par cette fin terrible, et due a ses forfaits, - Apprenez, Roi des Juifs, et n'oubliez jamais, - Que les rois dans le ciel ont un juge severe, - L'innocence un vengeur, et les orphelins un pere!" - RACINE, _Athalie_. - - "Regardless of the sweeping whirlwind's sway, - That, hushed in grim repose, expects its evening prey." - GRAY. - - -Before we follow the destinies of the House of Jehu we must revert to -Judah, and watch the final consequences of ruin which came in the -train of Ahab's Tyrian marriage, and brought murder and idolatry into -Judah, as well as into Israel. - -Athaliah, who, as queen-mother, was more powerful than the queen-consort -(_malekkah_), was the true daughter of Jezebel. She exhibits the same -undaunted fierceness, the same idolatrous fanaticism, the same swift -resolution, the same cruel and unscrupulous wickedness. - -It might have been supposed that the miserable disease of her husband -Jehoram, followed so speedily by the murder, after one year's reign, -of her son Ahaziah, might have exercised over her character the -softening influence of misfortune. On the contrary, she only saw in -these events a short path to the consummation of her ambition. - -Under Jehoram she had been queen: under Ahaziah she had exercised -still more powerful influence as Gebirah, and had asserted her sway -alike over her husband and over her son, whose counsellor she was to -do wickedly. It was far from her intention tamely to sink from her -commanding position into the abject nullity of an aged and despised -dowager in a dull provincial seraglio. She even thought that - - "To reign is worth ambition, though in hell; - Better to reign in hell than serve in heaven." - -The royal family of the House of David, numerous and flourishing as it -once was, had recently been decimated by cruel catastrophes. Jehoram, -instigated probably by his heathen wife, had killed his six younger -brothers.[233] Later on, the Arabs and Philistines, in their insulting -invasion, had not only plundered his palace, but had carried away his -sons; so that, according to the Chronicler, "there was never a son -left him, save Jehoahaz [_i.e._, Ahaziah], the youngest of his -sons."[234] He may have had other sons after that invasion; and -Ahaziah had left children, who must all, however, have been very -young, since he was only twenty-two or twenty-three when Jehu's -servants murdered him. Athaliah might naturally have hoped for the -regency; but this did not content her. When she saw that her son -Ahaziah was dead, "she arose and destroyed all the seed royal." In -those days the life of a child was but little thought of; and it -weighed less than nothing with Athaliah that these innocents were her -grandchildren. She killed all of whose existence she was aware, and -boldly seized the crown. No queen had ever reigned alone either in -Israel or in Judah. Judah must have sunk very low, and the talents of -Athaliah must have been commanding, or she could never have -established a precedent hitherto undreamed of, by imposing on the -people of David for six years the yoke of a woman, and that woman a -half-Phoenician idolatress. Yet so it was! Athaliah, like her cousin -Dido, felt herself strong enough to rule. - -But a woman's ruthlessness was outwitted by a woman's cunning. Ahaziah -had a half-sister on the father's side,[235] the princess Jehosheba, -or Jehoshabeath, who was then or afterwards (we are told) married to -Jehoiada, the high priest.[236] The secrets of harems are hidden deep, -and Athaliah may have been purposely kept in ignorance of the birth to -Ahaziah of a little babe whose mother was Zibiah of Beersheba, and who -had received the name of Joash. If she knew of his existence, some -ruse must have been palmed off upon her, and she must have been led to -believe that he too had been killed. But he had not been killed. -Jehosheba "stole him from among the king's sons that were slain," and, -with the connivance of his nurse, hid him from the murderers sent by -Athaliah in the palace store-room in which beds and couches were -kept.[237] Thence, at the first favourable moment, she transferred the -child and nurse to one of the chambers in the three storeys of -chambers which ran round the Temple, and were variously used as -wardrobes or as dwelling-rooms. - -The hiding-place was safe; for under Athaliah the Temple of Jehovah -fell into neglect and disrepute, and its resident ministers would not -be numerous. It would not have been difficult, in the seclusion of -Eastern life, for Jehosheba to pass off the babe as her own child to -all but the handful who knew the secret. - -Six years passed away, and the iron hand of Athaliah still kept the -people in subjection. She had boldly set up in Judah her mother's -Baal-worship. Baal had his temple not far from that of Jehovah; and -though Athaliah did not imitate Jezebel in persecuting the worshippers -of Jehovah, she made her own high priest, Mattan, a much more -important person than Jehoiada for all who desired to propitiate the -favours of the Court. - -Joash had now reached his seventh year, and a Jewish prince in his -seventh year is regarded as something more than a mere child. Jehoiada -thought that it was time to strike a blow in his favour, and to -deliver him from the dreadful confinement which made it impossible for -him to leave the Temple precincts. - -He began secretly to tamper with the guards both of the Temple and of -the palace. Upon the Levitic guards, indignant at the intrusion of -Baal-worship, he might securely count, and the Carites and queen's -runners were not likely to be very much devoted to the rule of the -manlike and idolatrous alien-queen. Taking an oath of them in secrecy, -he bound them to allegiance to the little boy whom he produced from the -Temple chamber as their lawful lord, and the son of their late king. - -The plot was well laid. There were five captains of the five hundred -royal body-guards, and the priest secretly enlisted them all in the -service.[238] The Chronicler says that he also sent round to all the -chief Levites, and collected them in Jerusalem for the emergency. The -arrangements of the Sabbath gave special facility to his plans; for on -that day only one of the five divisions of guards mounted watch at the -palace, and the others were set free for the service of the Temple.[239] -It had evidently been announced that some great ceremony would be held -in the shrine of Jehovah; for all the people, we are told, were -assembled in the courts of the house of the Lord. Jehoiada ordered one -of the companies to guard the palace; another to be at the "gate Sur," -or the gate "of the Foundation";[240] another at the gate behind the -barracks(?) of the palace-runners, to be a barrier[241] against any -incursion from the palace. Two more were to ensure the safety of the -little king by watching the precincts of the Temple. The Levitic -officers were to protect the king's person with serried ranks. Jehoiada -armed them with spears and shields, which David had placed as trophies -in the porch; and if any one tried to force his way within their lines -he was to be slain. The only danger to be apprehended was from any -Carite mercenaries, or palace-servants of the queen: among all others -Jehoiada found a widespread defection. The people, the Levites, even the -soldiers, all hated the Baal-worshipping usurper.[242] - -At the fateful moment the guards were arranged in two dense lines, -beginning from either side of the porch, till their ranks met beyond the -altar, so as to form a hedge round the royal boy. Into this triangular -space the young prince was led by the high priest, and placed beside the -_Matstsebah_--some prominent pillar in the Temple court, either one of -Solomon's pillars Jachin and Boaz, or some special erection of later -days.[243] Round him stood the princes of Judah, and there, in the midst -of them, Jehoiada placed the crown upon his head, and in significant -symbol also laid lightly upon it for a moment "The Testimony"--perhaps -the Ten Commandments and the Book of the Covenant--the most ancient -fragment of the Pentateuch[244]--which was treasured up with the pot of -manna inside or in front of the Ark. Then he poured on the child's head -the consecrated oil, and said, "Let the king live!" - -The completion of the ceremony was marked by the blare of the rams' -horns, the softer blast of the silver trumpets, and the answering shouts -of the soldiers and the people. The tumult, or the news of it, reached -the ears of Athaliah in the neighbouring palace, and, with all the -undaunted courage of her mother, she instantly summoned her escort, and -went into the Temple to see for herself what was taking place.[245] She -probably mounted the ascent which Solomon had made from the palace to -the Temple court, though it had long been robbed of its precious metals -and scented woods. She led the way, and thought to overawe by her -personal ascendency any irregularity which might be going on; for in the -deathful hush to which she had reduced her subjects she does not seem to -have dreamt of rebellion. No sooner had she entered than the guards -closed behind her, excluding and menacing her escort.[246] - -A glance was sufficient to reveal to her the significance of the whole -scene. There, in royal robes, and crowned with the royal crown, stood -her little unknown grandson beside the _Matstsebah_,[247] while round -him were the leaders of the people and the trumpeters, and the -multitudes were still rolling their tumult of acclamation from the court -below. In that sight she read her doom. Rending her clothes, she turned -to fly, shrieking, "Treason! treason!" Then the commands of the priest -rang out: "Keep her between the ranks,[248] till you have got her -outside the area of the Temple; and if any of her guards follow or try -to rescue her, kill him with the sword. But let not the sacred courts be -polluted with her blood." So they made way for her,[249] and as she -could not escape she passed between the rows of Levites and soldiers -till she had reached the private chariot-road by which the kings drove -to the precincts.[250] There the sword of vengeance fell. Athaliah -disappears from history, and with her the dark race of Jezebel. But her -story lives in the music of Handel and the verse of Racine. - -This is the only recorded revolution in the history of Judah. In two -later cases a king of Judah was murdered, but in both instances "the -people of the land" restored the Davidic heir. Life in Judah was less -dramatic and exciting than in Israel, but far more stable;[251] and -this, together with comparative immunity from foreign invasions, -constituted an immense advantage. - -Jehoiada, of course, became regent for the young king, and continued -to be his guide for many years, so that even the king's two wives were -selected by his advice. As the nation had been distracted with -idolatries, he made the covenant between the king and the people that -they should be loyal to each other, and between Jehoiada and the king -and the people that they should be Jehovah's people. Such covenants -were not infrequent in Jewish history. Such a covenant had been made -by Asa[252] after Abijam's apostasy, as it was afterwards made by -Hezekiah[253] and by Josiah.[254] The new covenant, and the sense of -awakenment from the dream of guilty apostasy, evoked an outburst of -spontaneous enthusiasm in the hearts of the populace. Of their own -impulse they rushed to the temple of Baal which Athaliah had reared, -dismantled it, and smashed to pieces his altars and images. The riot -was only stained by a single murder. They slew Mattan, Athaliah's -Baal-priest, before the altars of his god.[255] - -With Jehoiada begins the title of "high priest." Hitherto no higher -name than "the priest" had been given even to Aaron, or Eli, or Zadok; -but thenceforth the title of "chief priest" is given to his -successors, among whom he inaugurated a new epoch.[256] - -It was now Jehoiada's object to restore such splendour and solemnity -as he could to the neglected worship of the Temple, which had suffered -in every way from Baal's encroachments. He did this before the king's -second solemn inauguration. Even the porters had been done away with, -so that the Temple could at any time be polluted by the presence of -the unclean, and the whole service of priests and Levites had fallen -into desuetude. - -Then he took the captains, and the Carians, and the princes, and -conducted the boy-king, amid throngs of his shouting and rejoicing -people, from the Temple to his own palace. There he seated him on the -lion-throne of Solomon his father, in the great hall of justice, and -the city was quiet and the land had rest. According to the historian, -"Joash did right _all his days_, because Jehoiada the priest -instructed him."[257] The stock addition that "howbeit the _bamoth_ -were not removed, and the people still sacrificed and offered incense -there," is no derogation from the merits of Joash, and perhaps not -even of Jehoiada, since if the law against the _bamoth_ then existed, -it had become absolutely unknown, and these local sanctuaries were -held to be conducive to true religion.[258] - -It was natural that the child of the Temple should have at heart the -interests of the Temple in which he had spent his early days, and to -the shelter of which he owed his life and throne. The sacred house had -been insulted and plundered by persons whom the Chronicler calls "the -sons of Athaliah, that wicked woman,"[259] meaning, probably, her -adherents. Not only had its treasures been robbed to enrich the house -of Baal, but it had been suffered to fall into complete disrepair. -Breaches gaped in the outer walls, and the very foundations were -insecure. The necessity for restoring it occurred, not, as we should -have expected, to the priests who lived at its altar, but to the -boy-king. He issued an order to the priests that they should take -charge of all the money presented to the Temple for the hallowed -things, all the money paid in current coin, and all the assessments -for various fines and vows,[260] together with every freewill -contribution. They were to have this revenue entirely at their -disposal, and to make themselves responsible for the necessary -repairs. According to the Chronicler, they were further to raise a -subscription throughout the country from all their personal friends. - -The king's command had been urgent. Money had at first come in, but -nothing was done. Joash had reached the twenty-third year of his -reign, and was thirty years old; but the Temple remained in its old -sordid condition. The matter is passed over by the king as lightly, -courteously, and considerately as he could; but if he does not charge -the priests with downright embezzlement, he does reproach them for -most reprehensible neglect. They were the appointed guardians of the -house: why did they suffer its dilapidations to remain untouched year -after year, while they continued to receive the golden stream which -poured--but now, owing to the disgust of the people, in diminished -volume--into their coffers? "Take no more money, therefore," he said, -"from your acquaintances, but deliver it for the breaches of the -house." For what they had already received he does not call them to -account, but henceforth takes the whole matter into his own hands. The -neglectful priests were to receive no more contributions, and not to -be responsible for the repairs. Joash, however, ordered Jehoiada to -take a chest and put it beside the altar on the right.[261] All -contributions were to be dropped into this chest. When it was full, it -was carried by the Levites unopened into the palace,[262] and there -the king's chancellor and the high priest had the ingots weighed and -the money counted; its value was added up, and it was handed over -immediately to the architects, who paid it to the carpenters and -masons. The priests were left in possession of the money for the -guilt-offerings[263] and for the sin-offerings, but with the rest of -the funds they had nothing to do. In this way was restored the -confidence which the management of the hierarchy had evidently -forfeited, and with renewed confidence in the administration fresh -gifts poured in. Even in the cautious narrative of the Chronicler it -is clear that the priests hardly came out of these transactions with -flying colours. If their honesty is not formally impugned, at least -their torpor is obvious, as is the fact that they had wholly failed to -inspire the zeal of the people till the young king took the affair -into his own hands.[264] - -The long reign of Joash ended in eclipse and murder. If the later -tradition be correct, it was also darkened with atrocious ingratitude -and crime. - -For, according to the Chronicler, Jehoiada died at the advanced age of -one hundred and thirty, and was buried, as an unwonted honour, in the -sepulchres of the kings.[265] When he was dead, the princes of Judah -came to Joash, who had now been king for many years, and with a -strange suddenness tempted the zealous repairer of the Temple of -Jehovah into idolatrous apostasy. With soft speech they seduced him -into the worship of Asherim. It was marvellous indeed if the child of -the Temple became its foe, and he who had made a covenant with Jehovah -fell away to Baalim. But worse followed. Prophets reproved him, and he -paid them no heed, in spite of "the greatness of the burdens"--_i.e._, -the multitude of the menaces--laid upon him.[266] The stern, -denunciative harangues were despised. At last Zechariah, the son of -his benefactor Jehoiada, rebuked king and people. He cried aloud from -some eminence in the court of the Temple, that "since they had -transgressed the commandments of Jehovah they could not prosper: they -had forsaken Him, and He would forsake them." Infuriated by this -prophecy of woe, the guilty people, at the command of their guiltier -king, stoned him to death.[267] As he lay dying, he exclaimed, "The -Lord look upon it, and require it!"[268] - -The entire silence of the elder and better authority might lead us to -hope that there may be room for doubt as to the accuracy of the much -later tradition. Yet there certainly was a persistent belief that -Zechariah had been thus martyred. A wild legend, related in the -Talmud,[269] tells us that when Nebuzaradan conquered Jerusalem and -entered the Temple he saw blood bubbling up from the floor of the -court, and slaughtered ninety-four myriads, so that the blood flowed -till it touched the blood of Zechariah, that it might be fulfilled -which is said (Hos. iv. 2), "Blood toucheth blood." When he saw the -blood of Zechariah, and noticed that it was boiling and agitated, he -asked, "What is this?" and was told that it was the spilled blood of -the sacrifices. Finding this to be false, he threatened to comb the -flesh of the priests with iron curry-combs if they did not tell the -truth. Then they confessed that it was the blood of the murdered -Zechariah. "Well," he said, "I will pacify him." First he slaughtered -the greater and lesser Sanhedrin: but the blood did not rest. Then he -sacrificed young men and maidens: but the blood still bubbled. At -last he cried, "Zechariah, Zechariah, must I then slay them all?" Then -the blood was still, and Nebuzaradan, thinking how much blood he had -shed, fled, repented, and became a Jewish proselyte! - -Perhaps the worst feature of the story against Joash might have been -susceptible of a less shocking colouring. He had naturally all his life -been under the influence of priestly domination. The ascendency which -Jehoiada had acquired as priest-regent had been maintained till long -after the young king had arrived at full manhood. At last, however, he -had come into collision with the priestly body. He was in the right; -they were transparently in the wrong. The Chronicler, and even the older -historian, soften the story against the priests as much as they can; but -in both their narratives it is plain that Jehoiada and the whole -hierarchy had been more careful of their own interests than of those of -the Temple, of which they were the appointed guardians. Even if they can -be acquitted of potential malfeasance, they had been guilty of -reprehensible carelessness. It is clear that in this matter they did not -command the confidence of the people; for so long as they had the -management of affairs the sources of munificence were either dried up or -only flowed in scanty streams, whereas they were poured forth with glad -abundance when the administration of the funds was placed mainly in the -hands of laymen under the king's chancellor. It is probable that when -Jehoiada was dead Joash thought it right to assert his royal authority -in greater independence of the priestly party; and that party was headed -by Zechariah, the son of Jehoiada. The Chronicler says that he -prophesied: that, however, would not necessarily constitute him a -prophet, any more than it constituted Caiaphas. If he was a prophet, and -was yet at the head of the priests, he furnishes an all-but solitary -instance of such a position. The position of a prophet, occupied in the -great work of moral reformation, was so essentially antithetic to that -of priests, absorbed in ritual ceremonies, that there is no body of men -in Scripture of whom, as a whole, we have a more pitiful record than of -the Jewish priests. From Aaron, who made the golden calf, to Urijah, who -sanctioned the idolatrous altar of Ahaz, and so down to Annas and -Caiaphas, who crucified the Lord of glory, they rendered few signal -services to true religion. They opposed Uzziah when he invaded their -functions, but they acquiesced in all the idolatries and abominations of -Rehoboam, Abijah, Ahaziah, Ahaz, and many other kings, without a -syllable of recorded protest. When a prophet did spring from their -ranks, they set their faces with one consent, and were confederate -against him. They mocked and ridiculed Isaiah. When Jeremiah rose among -them, the priest Pashur smote him on the cheek, and the whole body -persecuted him to death, leaving him to be protected only by the pity of -eunuchs and courtiers. Ezekiel was the priestliest of the prophets, and -yet he was forced to denounce the apostasies which they permitted in the -very Temple. The pages of the prophets ring with denunciations of their -priestly contemporaries.[270] - -We do not know enough of Zechariah to say much about his character; -but priests in every age have shown themselves the most unscrupulous -and the most implacable of enemies. Joash probably stood to him in -the same relation that Henry II. stood to Thomas a Becket. The -priest's murder may have been due to an outburst of passion on the -part of the king's friends, or of the king himself--gentle as his -character seems to have been--without being the act of black -ingratitude which late traditions represented it to be. The legend -about Zechariah's blood represents the priest's spirit as so -ruthlessly unforgiving as to awaken the astonishment and even the -rebukes of the Babylonian idolater. Such a legend could hardly have -arisen in the case of a man who was other than a most formidable -opponent. The murder of Joash may have been, in its turn, a final -outcome of the revenge of the priestly party. The details of the story -must be left to inference and conjecture, especially as they are not -even mentioned in the earlier and more impartial annalists. - -It is at least singular that while Joash, the king, is blamed for -continuing the worship at the _bamoth_, Jehoiada, the high priest, is -_not_ blamed, though they continued throughout his long and powerful -regency. Further, we have an instance of the priest-regent's autocracy -which can hardly be regarded as redounding to his credit. It is -preserved in an accidental allusion on the page of Jeremiah. In Jer. -xxix. 26 we read his reproof and doom of the lying prophecy of the -priest Shemaiah the Nehelamite, because as a priest he had sent a -letter to the chief priest Zephaniah and all the priests, urging them -as the successors of Jehoiada to follow the ruling of Jehoiada, which -was to put Jeremiah in a collar. For Jehoiada, he said, "had ordered -the priests, as officers [_pakidim_] in the house of Jehovah, to put -in the stocks every one that is mad and maketh himself a -prophet."[271] If, then, the Jehoiada referred to is the -priest-regent, as seems undoubtedly to be the case, we see that he -hated all interference of Jehovah's prophets with his rule. That the -prophets were usually regarded by the world and by priests as "mad," -we see from the fact that the title is given by Jehu's captains to -Elisha's emissary;[272] and that this continued to be the case we see -from the fact that the priests and Pharisees of Jerusalem said of John -the Baptist that he had a devil, and of Christ that He was a -Samaritan, and that He, too, had a devil. If Joash was in opposition -to the priestly party, he was in the same position as all God's -greatest saints and reformers have ever been from the days of Moses to -the days of John Wesley. The dominance of priestcraft is the -invariable and inevitable death of true, as apart from functional, -religion. Priests are always apt to concentrate their attention upon -their temples, altars, religious practices and rites--in a word, upon -the externals of religion. If they gain a complete ascendency over -their fellow-believers, the faithful become their absolute slaves, -religion degenerates into formalism, "and the life of the soul is -choked by the observance of the ceremonial law." It was a misfortune -for the Chosen People that, except among the prophets and the wise -men, the external worship was thought much more of than the moral law. -"To the ordinary man," says Wellhausen, "it was not moral but -liturgical acts which seemed to be religious." This accounts for the -monotonous iteration of judgments on the character of kings, based -primarily, not upon their essential character, but on their relation -to the _bamoth_ and the calves. - -Although the historian of the Kings gives no hint of this dark story of -Zechariah's murder, or of the apostasy of Joash, and indeed narrates no -other event of the long reign of forty years, he tells us of the -deplorable close. Hazael's ambition had been fatal to Israel; and now, -in the cessation of Assyrian inroads upon Aram, he extended his arms -towards Judah. He went up against Gath and took it, and cherished -designs against Jerusalem. Apparently he did not head the expedition in -person, and the historian implies that Joash bought off the attack of -his "general." But the Chronicler makes things far worse. He says that -the Syrian host marched to Jerusalem, destroyed all the princes of the -people, plundered the city, and sent the spoil to Hazael, who was at -Damascus. Judah, he says, had assembled a vast army to resist the small -force of the Syrian raid; but Joash was ignominiously defeated, and was -driven to pay blackmail to the invader. As to this defeat in battle the -historian is silent; but he mentions what the Chronicler omits--namely, -that the only way in which Joash could raise the requisite bribe was by -once more stripping the Temple and the palace, and sending to Damascus -all the treasures which his three predecessors had consecrated,--though -we are surprised to learn that after so many strippings and plunderings -any of them could still be left. - -The anguish and mortification of mind caused by these disasters, and -perhaps the wounds he had received in the defeat of his army, threw -Joash into "great diseases." But he was not suffered to die of -these.[273] His servants--perhaps, if that story be authentic, to -avenge the slain son of Jehoiada, but doubtless also in disgust at -the national humiliation--rose in conspiracy against him, and smote -him at Beth-Millo,[274] where he was lying sick. The Septuagint, in 2 -Chron. xxiv. 27, adds the dark fact that _all his sons_ joined in the -conspiracy.[275] This cannot be true of Amaziah, who put the murderer -to death. Such, however, was the deplorable end of the king who had -stood by the Temple pillar in his fair childhood, amid the shouts and -trumpet-blasts of a rejoicing people. At that time all things seemed -full of promise and of hope. Who could have anticipated that the boy -whose head had been touched with the sacred oil and over-shadowed with -the Testimony--the young king who had made a covenant with Jehovah, -and had initiated the task of restoring the ruined Temple to its -pristine beauty--would end his reign in earthquake and eclipse? If -indeed he had been guilty of the black ingratitude and murderous -apostasy which tradition laid to his charge, we see in his end the -Nemesis of his ill-doing; yet we cannot but pity one who, after so -long a reign, perished amid the spoliation of his people, and was not -even allowed to end his days by the sore sickness into which he had -fallen, but was hurried into the next world by the assassin's knife. - -It is impossible not to hope that his deeds were less black than the -Chronicler painted. He had made the priests feel his power and -resentment, and their Levitic recorder was not likely to take a -lenient view of his offences. He says that though Joash was buried in -the City of David, he was not buried in the sepulchres of his fathers. -The historian of the Kings, however, expressly says that "they buried -him with his fathers in the City of David," and he was peaceably -succeeded by Amaziah his son. - -There is a curious, though it may be an accidental, circumstance about -the name of the two conspirators who slew him. They are called -"Jozacar, the son of Shimeath, and Jehozabad, the son of Shomer, his -servants." The names mean "Jehovah remembers," the son of "Hearer," -and "Jehovah awards," the son of "Watcher"; and this strangely recalls -the last words attributed in the Book of Chronicles to the martyred -Zechariah. "Jehovah look upon it, and require it!" The Chronicler -turns the names into "Zabad, the son of Shimeath, an Ammonitess, and -Jehozabad, the son of Shimrith, a Moabitess." Does he record this to -account for their murderous deed by the blood of hated nations which -ran in their veins? - -FOOTNOTES: - -[233] 2 Chron. xxi. 2-4. - -[234] 2 Chron. xxi. 17. - -[235] [Greek: homopatrios adelphe] (Jos.). - -[236] 2 Chron. xxii. 11. There are undoubted difficulties about the -statement (see _infra_). There is no other instance of the marriage of -a princess with a priest. - -[237] Jos., _Antt._, IX. vii. 1: [Greek: to tamieion ton klinon]. The -chamber of beds was a sort of unoccupied wardrobe-room. - -[238] 2 Kings xi. 4: "The centurions of the Carians and of the runners." - -[239] This is the second time that the word "Sabbath" occurs, or that -the institution is alluded to, in the history of either monarchy. - -[240] Nothing is known of [Hebrew: sur], Sur, or [Hebrew: yesod] -_y'sod_, the Foundation (2 Chron. xxiii. 5). They are not mentioned -elsewhere. LXX., [Greek: en te pule ton hodon], and (in Chronicles) -[Greek: en te pyle te mese]. - -[241] Not as in A.V., "that it be not broken down." - -[242] In reading side by side the narratives in the Books of Kings and -Chronicles (2 Chron. xxiii.), it is difficult to avoid the conclusion -that the main anxiety of the Chronicler is to leave the impression -that the work in the Temple was chiefly done by the Levites, and that -the sacred precincts were not polluted by the presence of alien -troops. He evidently stumbled at the notion, conveyed by the older -narrative, that Carians and suchlike semi-heathen mercenaries should -have stood by the altar at a high priest's command; so he substitutes -Levites for guardsmen, and the profane laymen are relegated outside. -In details the two accounts are only reconcilable by a special -pleading which would reconcile _any_ discrepancy. - -[243] 1 Kings vii. 21. Comp., however, 2 Kings xxiii. 3. - -[244] See Exod. xxv. 16, 21, xvi. 34. [Hebrew: hatzedut] (see 2 Chron. -xxiii. 11). Kimchi takes it to mean "a royal robe," and other Rabbis a -phylactery on the coronet (Deut. vi. 8). In the Targum to Chronicles -it is explained to mean the costly jewel (2 Sam. xii. 30), of which -none but a descendant of David could bear the weight. For _ha'edoth_ -Klostermann therefore suggests _hats'adoth_, "the royal bracelets." - -[245] So says Josephus ([Greek: meta tes idias stratias]), and it is -certain that she would hardly go unattended. - -[246] Jos., _Antt._, IX. vii. 3: [Greek: Tous de hepomenous hoplitas -eirxan eiselthein]. - -[247] The meaning of _al-ha'amod_ is uncertain (A.V., "by a pillar"; -Vulg., "on the tribunal"). Comp. 2 Kings xxiii. 3; 2 Chron. xxiii. 13; -1 Kings viii. 22; 2 Chron. vi. 13. - -[248] 2 Kings xi. 15. Not as in A.V., "without the ranges." Heb., -_lash'deroth_; LXX., [Greek: esothen ton saderoth]. - -[249] A.V., "And they laid hands on her"; LXX., [Greek: epebalon aute -cheiras]; Vulg., _imposuerunt ci manus_. But R.V. as in the text, -following the Targum, and the Jewish commentators, "They made for her -two sides." - -[250] This is usually understood to be the "horse gate" of the city -(Neh. iii. 28), and so Josephus seems to have taken it, for he says -that Athaliah was killed in "the Kedron Valley." Canon Rawlinson says -that it was more probably in the Tyropoeon Valley. But there could -have been no object in dragging the wretched queen all this way. -Jehoiada was only anxious that she should not stain the Temple with -her blood, and "the way by which the horses came into the king's -house" seems to be some private palace-gate. We are expressly told -(ver. 16) that Athaliah was slain "at the king's house," probably in -"the king's garden" (2 Kings xxv. 4). - -[251] Wellhausen, _Isr. and Jud._, p. 96. - -[252] 2 Chron. xv. 9-15. - -[253] 2 Chron. xxix. 10. - -[254] 2 Chron. xxxiv. 31. - -[255] The name is perhaps an abbreviation from Mattan-Baal, "gift of -Baal." Comp. "Methumballes" (Plaut.). The names of Tyrian kings, -Mitinna, Mattun, occur in inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser II. See -Herod., vii. 98 (Bahr, _ad loc._). "Methumbaal of Arvad" is mentioned -on a monument of Tiglath-Pileser II. (Schrader, ii. 249). - -[256] 2 Kings xii. 10; Jer. xxix. 26; 2 Chron. xxiv. 6. Stanley, -_Lectures_, ii. 399. - -[257] 2 Kings xii. 2. After "all his days," the R.V. and A.V. add -"_wherein_ Jehoiada instructed him." This, however, is not accurate. -There is a stop at days, and "wherein" should be "_because_." There -seems, however, from the LXX., to be some variation in the text, and -according to the Chronicler Joash became an apostate. LXX., [Greek: -Pasas tas hemeras has ephotizen auton ho hiereus]; Vulg., _Cunctis -diebus quibus docuit eum Jojadas sacerdos_. - -[258] The Chronicler (2 Chron. xxiv. 1, 2) _more suo_ copies 2 Kings -xii. 1, 2, but omits 3, because he dislikes the fact that not even his -hero Jehoiada had anything to say against the _bamoth_. But it appears -from 2 Kings xxiii. 9 that the _bamoth_ had regular priests of their -own, who "eat the priestly portions" (according to an old MS.) among -their brethren. - -[259] 2 Chron. xxiv. 7. - -[260] 2 Kings xii. 4: "The money that every man is set at." Lit., -"Each the money of the souls of his valuation." Comp. Numb. xviii. 16; -Lev. xxvii. 2. - -[261] The Chronicler says "at the gate." - -[262] 2 Chron. xxiv. 11. - -[263] Lev. v. 1-6, xiv. 13. "Trespass-money" is here first mentioned. - -[264] 2 Chron. xxiv. 8-10. There is a difference between the historian -and the Chronicler respecting the vessels of the house. - -[265] 2 Chron. xxiv. 15, 16. The statement of the Chronicler is (as so -often) surrounded by difficulties and improbabilities. If Jehoiada was -one hundred and thirty years old when he died, he must have been -ninety when Ahaziah was murdered, at the age of twenty-three. But as -Ahaziah was (apparently) born when his father Jehoram was eighteen, -Jehosheba must have been under eighteen, and must have been married to -a man seventy years older than herself! See Lord Arthur Hervey, _On -the Genealogies_, p. 113. - -[266] 2 Chron. xxiv. 27. - -[267] Stanley charitably thinks that Joash may have only burst into -hasty words like those of Henry II. against Becket. - -[268] The Chronicler says that "the _sons_ of Jehoiada" had helped to -crown him, and that he put "the _sons_ of Jehoiada" to death (2 Chron. -xxiii. 11, xxiv. 25). - -[269] Gittin, f. 57, 2; Sanhedrin, f. 96, 2; Hershon, _Treasures of -the Talmud_, p. 276; Lightfoot on Matt. xxiii. 35. There can be little -doubt that the reading "Berechiah" is a later correction of some one -who remembered the murder narrated in Jos., _B. J._, IV. v. 4, and -that the true reading is "son of Jehoiada." This is the last murder of -a prophet mentioned in the Old Testament, and we learn from the Gospel -the fact that he was slain "between the Temple and the altar." - -[270] Isa. xxiv. 2; Jer. v. 31, xxiii. 11; Ezek. vii. 26, xxii. 26; -Hos. iv. 9; Mic. iii. 11, etc. - -[271] Jer. xxix. 24-32. - -[272] 2 Kings ix. 11. - -[273] But from the Book of Kings we should not infer that there had been -any fighting at all. The Syrian commander had been bribed to retire. - -[274] We cannot understand the addition "on the way that goeth down to -Silla." Silla is nowhere else referred to. - -[275] LXX., 2 Chron. xxiv. 27, [Greek: kai hoi hyioi autou pantes]. - - - - - CHAPTER XV - - _AMAZIAH OF JUDAH_ - - B.C. 796-783 (?) - - 2 KINGS xiv. 1-22 - - "All they that take the sword shall perish with the sword."--MATT. - xxvi. 52. - - -The fate of Amaziah ("Jehovah is strong"), son of Joash of Judah, -resembles in some respects that of his father. Both began to reign -prosperously: the happiness of both ended in disaster. Amaziah at his -accession was twenty-five years old. He was the son of a lady of -Jerusalem named Jehoaddin. He reigned twenty-nine years, of which the -later ones were passed in misery, peril, and degradation, and, like -the unhappy Joash, and at about the same age, he fell the victim of -domestic conspiracy. - -The hereditary principle was too strongly established to enable the -murderers of Joash to set it aside, but Amaziah was not at first -strong enough to make any head against them. In time he became -established in his kingdom, and then his earliest act was to bring the -head conspirators, Jozacar and Jehozabad, to justice. It was noted as -a most remarkable circumstance that he did not put to death their -children, and extirpate their houses. In acting thus, if he were -influenced by a spirit of mercy, he showed himself before his time; -but such mercy was completely contrary to the universal custom, and -was also regarded as most impolitic. Even the comparatively merciful -Greeks had the proverb, "Fool, who has murdered the sire, and left his -sons to avenge him!"[276] - -In epochs of the wild justice of revenge, when blood-feuds are an -established and approved institution, the policy of letting vengeance -only fall on the actual offender was regarded as fatal. Perhaps Amaziah -felt it beyond his power to do more than bring the actual murderers to -justice, and it is possible that their children may have been among the -conspirators who, in his hour of shame, intimately destroyed him. - -The historian, it is true, attributes his conduct to magnanimity, or -rather to his obedience to the law, "The fathers shall not be put to -death for the children, nor the children for the fathers; but every -man shall die for his own sin." This is a reference to Deut. xxiv. 16, -and is probably the independent comment of the writer who recorded the -event two centuries later. In the gradual growth of a milder -civilisation, and the more common dominance of legal justice, such a -law may have come into force, as expressive of that voice of -conscience which is to sincere nations the voice of God. That the book -of Deuteronomy, as a book, was not in existence in its present form -till four reigns later we shall hereafter see strong reasons to -believe. But even if any part of that book was in existence, it is not -easy to understand how Amaziah would have been able to decide that the -law which forbade the punishment of the children with the offending -parents was the law which he was bound to follow, when Moses and -Joshua and other heroes of his race had acted on the olden principle. -The innocent families of Korah, Dathan, and Abiram were represented as -having been swallowed up with the ambitious heads of their houses. -Joshua and all Israel had not only stoned Achan, but with him all his -unoffending house. What, too, was the meaning of the law which -established the five Cities of Refuge as the best way to protect the -accidental homicide from the recognised and unrebuked actions of the -Goel--the avenger of blood? The vengeance of a Goel was regarded, as -it is in the East and South to this day, not as an implacable -fierceness, but as a sacred duty, the neglect of which would cover him -with infamy. Judging of our documents by the impartial light of honest -criticism, it seems impossible to deny that the law of Deuteronomy was -the law of an advancing civilisation, which became more mild as -justice became firmer and more available. If Deuteronomy represents -the legislation of Moses, we can only say that in this respect Amaziah -was the first person who paid the slightest attention to it. Such -exceptional obedience may well excite the notice of the historian, in -whose pages we see that prophets like Ahijah, Elijah, and Elisha had, -again and again, in accordance with the spirit of their times, -contemplated the total excision, not only of erring kings, but even of -their little children and their most distant kinsfolk. - -Further:--We are told that Amaziah "did that which was right in the -sight of Jehovah: he did according to all things _as Joash his father -did_." The Chronicler also bestows his eulogy on Amaziah; but having -told such dark stories of the apostasy of Joash to Asherah-worship -and his murder of the prophets, he could hardly add "as Joash his -father did"; so he omits those words. The reservation that Amaziah did -right, "yet not like David his father" (2 Kings xiv. 3), "but not with -a perfect heart" (2 Chron. xxv. 2), is followed by the stock abatement -about the _bamoth_, and the sacrifices and incense burnt in them. This -was a crime in the eyes of writers in B.C. 540, but certainly not in -the eyes of any king before the discovery of the "Book of the Law" in -the reign of Josiah, B.C. 621. We are compelled, therefore, by simple -truth, to ask, How came it that Amaziah should be so scrupulous as to -observe the Deuteronomic law by not slaying the sons of his father's -murderers, while he does not seem to be aware, any more than the best -of his predecessors, that while he obeyed one precept he was violating -the essence and spirit of the entire code in which the precept occurs? -The one main object, the constantly repeated law of Deuteronomy, is -the centralisation of all worship, and the rigid prohibition of every -local place of sacrifice. Strange that Amaziah should have selected -for attention a single precept, while he is profoundly unconscious of, -or indifferent to, the fact that he is setting aside the regulation -with which the law, as Deuteronomy represents it, begins and ends, and -on which it incessantly insists! - -Joash had been something of a weakling, as though the gloom of his -early concealment in the Temple and the shadow of priestly dominance -had paralysed his independence. Amaziah, on the other hand, born in -the purple, was vigorous and restless. When he was secure upon the -throne, and had done his duty to his father's memory, he bent his -efforts to recover Edom. The Edomites had revolted in the days of his -great-grandfather Jehoram,[277] and since then "did tear -perpetually,"[278] harassing with incessant raids the miserable -fellahin of Southern Judah. They reaped the crops of the settled -inhabitants, cut down their fruit-trees, burnt their farmsteads, and -carried their children into cruel and hopeless slavery. One verse -tells us all that the historian knew, or cared to relate, of Amaziah's -campaign. He only says that it was eminently successful. Amaziah -confronted the Edomites in the Valley of Salt,[279] on the border of -Edom, to the south of the Dead Sea, and inflicted upon them a signal -defeat. He not only slaughtered ten thousand of them, but, advancing -southwards, he stormed and captured Selah or Petra, their rocky -capital, two days' journey north of Ezion-Geber, on the gulf of -Akabah.[280] Considering the natural strength of Petra, amid its -mountain-fastnesses, this was a victory of which he might well be -proud, and he marked his prowess by changing the name of the city to -Joktheel, "subdued by God." The historian, copying the ancient record -before him, says that Selah continued to be so called "to this -day."[281] This is a curious instance of close transcription, for it -is certain that Selah can only have retained the name of Joktheel for -a very short period, and had lost it long before the days of the -Exile. Even in the reign of Ahaz (B.C. 735-715) the Edomites had so -completely recovered lost ground that they were able to make -predatory excursions into Judah, and to threaten Hebron, which would -have been obviously impossible if they were not masters of their own -chief capital.[282] The district which Amaziah seems to have conquered -was mainly west of the Arabah. He wished to restore Elath, and perhaps -to carry out the old commerce with the Red Sea which Solomon began, -and which had fired the ambition of Jehoshaphat. The conquest of Selah -secured the road for his commercial caravans. - -So far the older and better authorities. The Chronicler expands the -story in his usual fashion, in which historical and critical verity is -so often compelled, if not to suspect the disease of exaggeration and -the bias of Levitism, at least to feel uncertainty as to the details. -He says that Amaziah collected an army of three hundred thousand men -of Judah, trained them to a high state of discipline, and armed them -with spear and shield. He hired in addition one hundred thousand -Israelitish mercenaries, mighty men of valour, at the heavy cost of -one hundred talents of silver. He was rebuked by a prophet for -employing Israelites, "because the Lord was not with them," so that if -he used their aid he would certainly be defeated. Amaziah asked what -he was to do for the hundred talents, and the prophet told him that -Jehovah could give him much more than this.[283] So he dismissed his -Ephraimites who, returning home in great fury, "fell upon the cities -of Judah," from Samaria even unto Beth-horon, killed three thousand of -their inhabitants, and took much spoil. Amaziah, however, defeated the -Edomites without their aid, and not only slew ten thousand, but took -captive ten thousand more, all of whom he dashed to pieces by hurling -them from the top of the rock of Petra.[284] - -Then, by an apostasy much more astounding than even that of his father -Joash, he took home with him the idols of Mount Seir, worshipped them, -and burnt incense before them. Jehovah sends a prophet to rebuke him -for his senseless infatuation in worshipping the gods of the Edomites -whom he had just so utterly defeated; but Amaziah returns him the -insolent answer, "Who made thee of the king's council? Be silent, or I -will put thee to death." The prophet met his ironical sneer with words -of deeper meaning: "If I am not on _your_ council, I am on God's. -Because thou hast not hearkened to my counsel, I know that God has -counselled to destroy thee." - -The later writer thus accounts for the folly and overthrow of this -valorous and hitherto eminently pious king. Certain it is, as we shall -narrate in the next chapter, that, in spite of warning, he had the -temerity to challenge to battle the warlike Joash ben-Jehoahaz of -Israel, grandson of Jehu. The kings met at Beth-Shemesh, and Amaziah -was utterly routed, with consequences so shameful to himself and to -Jerusalem that he was never able to hold up his head again. He could -but eat away his own heart in despair, a ruined man. After this he -"lived" rather than reigned fifteen years longer.[285] The wall of -Jerusalem, broken down near the Damascus Gate, on the side towards -Israel, for a space of four hundred cubits, was a standing witness of -the king's infatuated folly. His people were ashamed of him, and weary -of him; and at last, seeing that nothing more could be expected of one -whose spirit had evidently been broken from impetuosity into -abjectness, they formed a conspiracy against him. To save his life he -fled to the strong fort of Lachish, a royal Canaanite city, in the -hills to the south-west of Judah.[286] But they pursued him thither, -and even Lachish would not protect him. He was murdered. They threw -the corpse upon a chariot, conveyed it to Jerusalem, and buried it in -the sepulchres of his fathers. The people quietly elevated to the -throne his son Azariah, then sixteen years old, who had been born the -year before his father's crowning disgrace. What became of the -conspirators we do not know. They were probably too strong to be -brought to justice, and we are not told that Azariah even attempted to -visit their crime upon their heads. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[276] [Greek: Nepios hos patera kteinas hyious kataleipei]. Comp. Q. -Curtius, vi. 11: "Lege cautum erat ut propinqui eorum qui regi -insidiati cum ipsis necarentur." Cic., _Ad Brut._, 15. - -[277] 2 Kings viii. 20-22. - -[278] Amos i. 11. - -[279] The Valley (_Ge_) of Salt is "the plain of the Sabkah," about -two miles broad, between the southern end of the Dead Sea and the -hills which separate the Ghor from the Arabah (Seetzen, _Reisen_, ii. -356; Robinson, _Researches_, ii. 450, 488). David had won a great -victory there (2 Sam. viii. 13; Psalm lx., _title_). - -[280] Selah, "a rock" ([Greek: Petra]). Eusebius calls it Rekem. - -[281] It is the name also of a city of Judah (Josh. xv. 38). - -[282] 2 Chron. xxviii. 17; Jos., _Antt._, XII. viii. 6. - -[283] 2 Chron. xxv. 5-10, 13. - -[284] [Greek: Katakremnismos]. This mode of execution prevailed till -quite recent times in the little republic of Andorra. - -[285] 2 Kings xiv. 17. The phrase that "he _lived_ fifteen years" is -unusual, and seems to imply that the historian saw,-- - - "In more of life true life no more." - - -[286] Josh. x. 6, 31, xv. 39; 2 Kings xviii. 17; 2 Chron. xi. 9. - - - - - CHAPTER XVI - - _THE DYNASTY OF JEHU_ - - B.C. - Jehoahaz 814-797 2 Kings xiii. 1-9 - Joash 797-781 " xiii. 10-21, xiv. 8-16 - Jeroboam II. 781-740 " xiv. 23-29 - Zechariah 740 " xv. 8-12 - - "Them that honour Me I will honour, and they that despise Me shall - be lightly esteemed."--1 SAM. ii. 30. - - -Israel had scarcely ever sunk to so low a nadir of degradation as she -did in the reign of the son of Jehu. We have already mentioned that -some assign to his reign the ghastly story which we have narrated in -our sketch of the work of Elisha. It is told in the sixth chapter of -the Second Book of Kings, and seems to belong to the reign of Jehoram -ben-Ahab; but it may have got displaced from this epoch of yet deeper -wretchedness. The accounts of Jehoahaz in 2 Kings xiii. are evidently -fragmentary and abrupt. - -Jehoahaz reigned seventeen years.[287] Naturally, he did not disturb -the calf-worship, which, like all his predecessors and successors, he -regarded as a perfectly innocent symbolic adoration of Jehovah, whose -name he bore and whose service he professed. Why should he do so? It -had been established now for more than two centuries. His father, in -spite of his passionate and ruthless zeal for Jehovah, had never -attempted to disturb it. No prophet--not even Elijah nor Elisha, the -practical establishers of his dynasty--had said one word to condemn -it. It in no way rested on his conscience as an offence; and the -formal condemnation of it by the historian only reflects the more -enlightened judgment of the Southern Kingdom and of a later age. But -according to the parenthesis which breaks the thread of this king's -story (2 Kings xiii. 5, 6), he was guilty of a far more culpable -defection from orthodox worship; for in his reign, the Asherah--the -tree or pillar of the Tyrian nature-goddess--still remained in -Samaria, and therefore must have had its worshippers. How it came -there we cannot tell. Jezebel had set it up (1 Kings xvi. 33), with -the connivance of Ahab. Jehu apparently had "put it away" with the -great stele of Baal (2 Kings iii. 2), but, for some reason or other, -he had not destroyed it. It now apparently occupied some public place, -a symbol of decadence, and provocative of the wrath of Heaven. - -Jehoahaz sank very low. Hazael's savage sword, not content with the -devastation of Bashan and Gilead, wasted the west of Israel also in -all its borders. The king became a mere vassal of his brutal neighbour -at Damascus. So little of the barest semblance of power was left him, -that whereas, in the reign of David, Israel could muster an army of -eight hundred thousand, and in the reign of Joash, the son and -successor of Jehoahaz, Amaziah could hire from Israel one hundred -thousand mighty men of valour as mercenaries, Jehoahaz was only -allowed to maintain an army of ten chariots, fifty horsemen, and ten -thousand infantry! In the picturesque phrase of the historian, "the -King of Syria had threshed down Israel to the dust," in spite of all -that Jehoahaz did, or tried to do, and "all his might." How completely -helpless the Israelites were is shown by the fact that their armies -could offer no opposition to the free passage of the Syrian troops -through their land. Hazael did not regard them as threatening his -rear; for, in the reign of Jehoahaz, he marched southwards, took the -Philistine city of Gath, and threatened Jerusalem. Joash of Judah -could only buy them off with the bribe of all his treasures, and -according to the Chronicler they "destroyed all the princes of the -people," and took great spoil to Damascus.[288] - -Where was Elisha? After the anointing of Jehu he vanishes from the -scene. Unless the narrative of the siege of Samaria has been displaced, -we do not so much as once hear of him for nearly half a century. - -The fearful depth of humiliation to which the king was reduced drove -him to repentance. Wearied to death of the Syrian oppression of which -he was the daily witness, and of the utter misery caused by prowling -bands of Ammonites and Moabites--jackals who waited on the Syrian -lion--Jehoahaz "besought the Lord,[289] and the Lord hearkened unto -him, and gave Israel a saviour, so that they went out from under the -hand of the Syrians: and the children of Israel dwelt in their tents, -as beforetime." If this indeed refers to events which come out of -place in the memoirs of Elisha; and if Jehoahaz ben-Jehu, not Jehoram -ben-Ahab, was the king in whose reign the siege of Samaria was so -marvellously raised, then Elisha may possibly be the temporary -deliverer who is here alluded to.[290] On this supposition we may see -a sign of the repentance of Jehoahaz in the shirt of sackcloth which -he wore under his robes, as it became visible to his starving people -when he rent his clothes on hearing the cannibal instincts which had -driven mothers to devour their own children. But the respite must have -been brief, since Hazael (ver. 22) oppressed Israel all the days of -Jehoahaz. If this rearrangement of events be untenable, we must -suppose that the repentance of Jehoahaz was only so far accepted, and -his prayer so far heard, that the deliverance, which did not come in -his own days, came in those of his son and of his grandson. - -Of him and of his wretched reign we hear no more; but a very different -epoch dawned with the accession of his son Joash, named after the -contemporary King of Judah, Joash ben-Ahaziah. - -In the Books of Kings and Chronicles Joash of Israel is condemned with -the usual refrains about the sins of Jeroboam. No other sin is laid to -his charge; and breaking the monotony of reprobation which tells us of -every king of Israel without exception that "he did that which was -evil in the sight of the Lord," Josephus boldly ventures to call him -"a good man, and the antithesis to his father." - -He reigned sixteen years. At the beginning of his reign he found his -country the despised prey, not only of Syria, but of the paltry -neighbouring bandit-sheykhs who infested the east of the Jordan; he -left it comparatively strong, prosperous, and independent. - -In his reign we hear again of Elisha, now a very old man of past eighty -years. Nearly half a century had elapsed since the grandfather of Joash -had destroyed the house of Ahab at the prophet's command. News came to -the king that Elisha was sick of a mortal sickness, and he naturally -went to visit the death-bed of one who had called his dynasty to the -throne, and had in earlier years played so memorable a part in the -history of his country. He found the old man dying, and he wept over -him, crying, "My father, my father! the chariot of Israel, and the -horsemen thereof."[291] The address strikes us with some surprise. -Elisha had indeed delivered Samaria more than once when the city had -been reduced to direst extremity; but in spite of his prayers and of his -presence, the sins of Israel and her kings had rendered this chariot of -Israel of very small avail. The names of Ahab, Jehu, Jehoahaz, call up -memories of a series of miseries and humiliations which had reduced -Israel to the very verge of extinction. For sixty-three years Elisha had -been the prophet of Israel; and though his public interpositions had -been signal on several occasions, they had not been availing to prevent -Ahab from becoming the vassal of Assyria, nor Israel from becoming the -appanage of the dominion of that Hazael whom Elisha himself had anointed -King of Syria, and who had become of all the enemies of his country the -most persistent and the most implacable. - -The narrative which follows is very singular. We must give it as it -occurs, with but little apprehension of its exact significance. - -Elisha, though Joash "did that which was evil in the sight of the -Lord," seems to have regarded him with affection. He bade the youth -take his bow,[292] and laid his feeble, trembling hands on the strong -hands of the king. Then he ordered an attendant to fling open the -lattice, and told the king to shoot eastward towards Gilead, the -region whence the bands of Syria made their way over the Jordan. The -king shot, and the fire came back into the old prophet's eye as he -heard the arrow whistle eastward. He cried, "The arrow of Jehovah's -deliverance, even the arrow of victory over Syria: for thou shalt -smite the Syrians in Aphek, till thou have consumed them."[293] Then -he bade the young king to take the sheaf of arrows, and smite towards -the ground, as if he was striking down an enemy. Not understanding the -significance of the act, the king made the sign of thrice striking the -arrows downwards, and then naturally stopped.[294] But Elisha was -angry--or at any rate grieved.[295] "You should have smitten five or -six times," he said, "and then you would have smitten Syria to -destruction. Now you shall only smite Syria thrice." The king's fault -seems to have been lack of energy and faith. - -There are in this story some peculiar elements which it is impossible -to explain, but it has one beautiful and striking feature. It tells -us of the death-bed of a prophet. Most of God's greatest prophets have -perished amid the hatred of priests and worldlings. The progress of -the truth they taught has been "from scaffold to scaffold, and from -stake to stake." - - "Careless seems the Great Avenger. History's pages but record - One death-grapple in the darkness 'twixt old systems and the - Word-- - Truth for ever on the scaffold, wrong for ever on the throne; - Yet that scaffold sways the Future, and behind the dim - unknown - Standeth God within the shadow, keeping watch above His own!" - -Now and then, however, as an exception, a great prophetic teacher or -reformer escapes the hatred of the priests and of the world, and dies in -peace. Savonarola is burnt, Huss is burnt, but Wiclif dies in his bed at -Lutterworth, and Luther died in peace at Eisleben. Elijah passed away in -storm, and was seen no more. A king comes to weep by the death-bed of -the aged Elisha. "For us," it has been said, "the scene at his bedside -contains a lesson of comfort and even encouragement. Let us try to -realise it. A man with no material power is dying in the capital of -Israel. He is not rich: he holds no office which gives him any immediate -control over the actions of men; he has but one weapon--the power of his -word. Yet Israel's king stands weeping at his bedside--weeping because -this inspired messenger of Jehovah is to be taken from him. In him both -king and people will lose a mighty support, for this man is a greater -strength to Israel than chariots and horsemen are. Joash does well to -mourn for him, for he has had courage to wake the nation's conscience; -the might of his personality has sufficed to turn them in the true -direction, and rouse their moral and religious life. Such men as Elisha -everywhere and always give a strength to their people above the strength -of armies, for the true blessings of a nation are reared on the -foundations of its moral force." - -The annals are here interrupted to introduce a posthumous -miracle--unlike any other in the whole Bible--wrought by the bones of -Elisha. He died, and they buried him, "giving him," as Josephus says, -"a magnificent burial." As usual, the spring brought with it the -marauding bands of Moabites. Some Israelites who were burying a man -caught sight of them, and, anxious to escape, thrust the man into the -sepulchre of Elisha, which happened to be nearest at hand. But when he -was placed in the rocky tomb, and touched the bones of Elisha, he -revived, and stood up on his feet. Doubtless the story rests on some -real circumstance. There is, however, something singular in the turn -of the original, which says (literally) that the man _went and -touched_ the bones of Elisha;[296] and there is proof that the story -was told in varying forms, for Josephus says that it was the Moabite -plunderers who had killed the man, and that he was thrown by them into -Elisha's tomb.[297] It is easy to invent moral and spiritual lessons -out of this incident, but not so easy to see what lesson is intended -by it. Certainly there is not throughout Scripture any other passage -which even _seems_ to sanction any suspicions of magic potency in the -relics of the dead.[298] - -But Elisha's symbolic prophecy of deliverance from Syria was amply -fulfilled. About this time Hazael had died, and had left his power in -the feebler hands of his son Benhadad III. Jehoahaz had not been able -to make any way against him (2 Kings xiii. 3), but Joash his son -thrice met and thrice defeated him at Aphek. As a consequence of these -victories, he won back all the cities which Hazael had taken from his -father on the west of Jordan. The east of Jordan was never recovered. -It fell under the shadow of Assyria, and was practically lost for ever -to the tribes of Israel. - -Whether Assyria lent her help to Joash under certain conditions we do -not know. Certain it is that from this time the terror of Syria -vanishes. The Assyrian king Rammanirari III. about this time -subjugated all Syria and its king, whom the tablets call Mari, perhaps -the same as Benhadad III. In the next reign Damascus itself fell into -the power of Jeroboam II., the son of Joash. - -One more event, to which we have already alluded, is narrated in the -reign of this prosperous and valiant king. - -Amity had reigned for a century between Judah and Israel, the result -of the politic-impolitic alliance which Jehoshaphat had sanctioned -between his son Jehoram and the daughter of Jezebel. It was obviously -most desirable that the two small kingdoms should be united as closely -as possible by an offensive and defensive alliance. But the bond -between them was broken by the overweening vanity of Amaziah ben-Joash -of Judah. His victory over the Edomites, and his conquest of Petra, -had puffed him up with the mistaken notion that he was a very great -man and an invincible warrior. He had the wicked infatuation to kindle -an unprovoked war against the Northern Tribes. It was the most wanton -of the many instances in which, if Ephraim did not envy Judah, at -least Judah vexed Ephraim, Amaziah challenged Joash to come out to -battle, that they might look one another in the face. He had not -recognised the difference between fighting with and without the -sanction of the God of battles. - -Joash had on his hands enough of necessary and internecine war to make -him more than indifferent to that bloody game. Moreover, as the superior -of Amaziah in every way, he saw through his inflated emptiness. He knew -that it was the worst possible policy for Judah and Israel to weaken -each other in fratricidal war, while Syria threatened their northern and -eastern frontiers, and while the tread of the mighty march of Assyria -was echoing ominously in the ears of the nations from afar. Better and -kinder feelings may have mingled with these wise convictions. He had no -wish to destroy the poor fool who so vaingloriously provoked his -superior might. His answer was one of the most crushingly contemptuous -pieces of irony which history records, and yet it was eminently kindly -and good-humoured. It was meant to save the King of Judah from advancing -any further on the path of certain ruin. - -"The thistle that was in Lebanon" (such was the apologue which he -addressed to his would-be rival) "sent to the cedar that was in -Lebanon, saying: Give thy daughter to my son to wife.[299] The cedar -took no sort of notice of the thistle's ludicrous presumption, but a -wild beast that was in Lebanon passed by, and trod down the thistle." - -It was the answer of a giant to a dwarf;[300] and to make it quite -clear to the humblest comprehension, Joash good-naturedly added: "You -are puffed up with your victory over Edom: glory in this, and stay at -home. Why by your vain meddling should you ruin yourself and Judah with -you? Keep quiet: I have something else to do than to attend to you." - -Happy had it been for Amaziah if he had taken warning! But vanity is a -bad counsellor, and folly and self-deception--ill-matched pair--were -whirling him to his doom. Seeing that he was bent on his own -perdition, Joash took the initiative and marched to Beth-Shemesh, in -the territory of Judah.[301] There the kings met, and there Amaziah -was hopelessly defeated. His troops fled to their scattered homes, and -he fell into the hands of his conqueror. Joash did not care to take -any sanguinary revenge; but much as he despised his enemy, he thought -it necessary to teach him and Judah the permanent lesson of not again -meddling to their own hurt. He took the captive king with him to -Jerusalem, which opened its gates without a blow.[302] We do not know -whether, like a Roman conqueror, he entered it through the breach of -four hundred cubits which he ordered them to make in the walls,[303] -but otherwise he contented himself with spoil which would swell his -treasure, and amply compensate for the expenses of the expedition -which had been forced upon him. He ransacked Jerusalem for silver and -gold; he made Obed-Edom, the treasurer, give up to him all the sacred -vessels of the Temple, and all that was worth taking from the palace. -He also took hostages--probably from among the number of the king's -sons--to secure immunity from further intrusions. It is the first time -in Scripture that hostages are mentioned. It is to his credit that he -shed no blood, and was even content to leave his defeated challenger -with the disgraced phantom of his kingly power, till, fifteen years -later, he followed his father to the grave through the red path of -murder at the hand of his own subjects.[304] - -After this we hear no further records of this vigorous and able king, -in whom the characteristics of his grandfather Jehu are reflected in -softer outline. He left his son Jeroboam II. to continue his career of -prosperity, and to advance Israel to a pitch of greatness which she -had never yet attained, in which she rivalled the grandeur of the -united kingdom in the earlier days of Solomon's dominion. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[287] I have not thought it worth while to unravel by a series of -uncertain conjectures the careless, and often self-contradictory, -synchronism of the reigns of the kings in the two kingdoms. The compiler -of these books evidently attached little or no importance to accurate -chronology. For instance, the data of 2 Kings xiii. 1, 10, do not -coincide; and instead of entering into tedious, doubtful, and confusing -guesses, I have contented myself throughout with giving for the reigns -of the kings such dates, or approximate dates, as seem to result from -the several notices compared with the contemporary annals of Assyria. - -[288] 2 Chron. xxiv. 23. - -[289] 2 Kings xiii. 4; "besought," literally "_stroked the face of_" -(1 Sam. xiii. 12; 1 Kings xiii. 6). - -[290] The reference is usually explained of Jeroboam II. - -[291] Comp. 2 Kings ii. 12. - -[292] Lit., "Make thine hand to ride upon thy bow." There is not the -slightest taint of belomancy in the story (comp. Ezek. xxi. 21), nor -does it allude to shooting an arrow into an enemy's country as a -declaration of war (Virg., _AEn._, ix. 57). - -[293] Aphek, a name of good omen (1 Kings xx. 26-30). - -[294] Thrice. Comp. Num. xxii. 28; Exod. xxiii. 17, etc. - -[295] LXX., [Greek: elypethe]. - -[296] See R.V., margin. - -[297] _Antt._, IX. viii. 6. - -[298] See Ecclus. xlviii. 13: "When he was dead, he prophesied in the -tomb." (But the clause may be spurious.) - -[299] Possibly some matrimonial proposal may have lain behind the -interchange of messages. - -[300] Stade. For similar parables see Judg. ix. 8; Herod., i. 141; -Rawlinson, _Anc. Mon._, iii. 226. - -[301] Beth-Shemesh, "the house of the sun." It is mentioned in 1 Sam. -vi. 9, 12, and was a priestly city, and one of Solomon's store-cities -(1 Kings iv. 9). It ultimately fell into the hands of the Philistines -(2 Chron. xxviii. 18). It is not the Beth-Shemesh of Josh. xix. 22. - -[302] Josephus says that this was the fault of Amaziah, whom Joash of -Israel threatened with death if Jerusalem resisted. - -[303] This implies that at least half the northern wall was -dismantled--the wall towards Ephraim. - -[304] Some have conjectured that Amaziah of Judah became more or less -the vassal of Joash of Israel, and that the vassalage continued till -after the death of Jeroboam II. (1) For Jeroboam II. held Elath till -his death, when Uzziah recovered it (2 Kings xiv. 22), and he -certainly could not have held this southern Judaean port if Judah was -entirely independent; and (2) we read that Uzziah did not become king -at all till the _twenty-seventh_ year of Jeroboam II. But if Amaziah -only survived Joash of Israel fifteen years (2 Kings xiv. 17), Uzziah -must have succeeded in the _fifteenth_ year of Jeroboam. Is the -explanation to be found in the fact that up to that time--for twelve -years--Jeroboam did not allow the Judaeans to elect a king? or are -these among the hopeless confusion of synchronism which cannot be -reconciled at all with our present data? - - - - - CHAPTER XVII - - _THE DYNASTY OF JEHU (continued)--JEROBOAM II_ - - B.C. 781-740 - - 2 KINGS xiv. 23-29 - - -If we had only the history of the kings to depend upon, we should -scarcely form an adequate conception either of the greatness of -Jeroboam II. or of the condition of society which prevailed in Israel -during his long and most prosperous reign of forty-one years (B.C. -781-740). In the Books of Chronicles he is merely mentioned -accidentally in a genealogy. The Second Book of Kings only devotes one -verse to him (xiv. 25) beyond the stock formulae of connection so often -repeated. That verse, however, gives us at least a glimpse of his -great importance, for it tells us that "he restored the coast of -Israel from the entering of Hamath unto the sea of the plain." Those -two lines sufficiently prove to us that he was by far the greatest and -most powerful of all the kings of Israel, as he was also the -longest-lived and had the longest reign. His victories flung a broad -gleam of sunset over the afflicted kingdom, and, for a time, they -might have beguiled the Israelites into lofty hopes for the future; -but with the death of Jeroboam the light instantly faded away, and -there was no after-glow. - -And this sudden brightness, if it deceived others, did not deceive the -prophets of the Lord. It happened in accordance with the promise of -Jehovah given by Jonah, the son of Amittai, of Gath-Hepher;[305] but -Amos and Hosea saw that the glory of the reign was hollow and -delusive, and that the outward prosperity did but "skin and film the -ulcerous place" below. - -In truth, the possibility of this sudden outburst of success was due to -the very enemy who, within a few years, was to grind Israel to powder. -God pitied the deplorable overthrow of His chosen people: He saw that -there was neither slave nor freeman--"neither any shut up, nor any left -at large, nor any helper for Israel"; and in Jeroboam He gave them the -saviour who had been granted to the penitence of Jehoahaz.[306] It was, -so to speak, a last pledge to them of the love and mercy of Jehovah, -which gave them a respite, and would fain have saved them altogether, if -they had turned with their whole heart to Him. And, personally, Jeroboam -II. seems to have been one of the better kings. Not a single crime is -laid to his charge; for under the circumstances of its deep-rooted -continuance through the reigns of all his predecessors, it cannot be -deemed a heinous crime that he did not put down the symbolic cult of -Jehovah by the cherubic emblems at Dan and Bethel. The fact that he had -been named after the founder of the kingdom of Israel shows that the -kingdom was proud of the valiant and Heaven-commissioned rebel who had -thrown off the yoke of the house of Solomon. The house of Jehu admired -his policy and his institutions. The son of Nebat did not by any means -appear in the eyes of his people as only worthy of the monotonous -epitaph, "who made Israel to sin." It is true that now the voice of -prophecy in Israel itself began to denounce the concomitants of the -"calf-worship"; but the voices of the Jewish herdsman of Tekoa and of -the Israelite Hosea probably raised but faint murmurs in the ears of the -warrior-king, with whom they do not seem to have come into personal -contact. In no case would he rank them as equal in importance with the -fiery Elijah or the king-making Elisha, who had been for four -generations the counsellor of his race. Neither of those great prophets -had insisted on the Deuteronomic law of a centralised worship, nor had -they denounced the revered local sanctuaries with which Israel had been -so long familiar. Jonah, indeed--who, if legend be correct, had been the -boy of Zarephath, and the personal attendant of Elijah--had predicted -the king's unbroken success, and had neither made it conditional on a -religious revolution, nor, so far as we know, had in any way censured -the existing institutions. - -What rendered Jeroboam's glory possible was the immediate paralysis -and imminent ruin of the power of Syria. The Israelitish king was -probably on good terms with Assyria, and, during this epoch, three -Assyrian monarchs had struck blow after blow against the house of -Hazael. Damascus and its dependencies had received shattering defeats -at the hands of Rammanirari III., Shalmaneser III. (782-772), and -Assurdan III. (772-754). Rammanirari had made expeditions against -Damascus (773) and Hazael (772), and Assurdan had invaded the Syrian -domains in 767, 755, and 754. Syria had more than enough to do to hold -her own in a struggle for life and death against her atrocious -neighbour. With Uzziah in Judah, Jeroboam II. seems to have been on -the friendliest terms; and probably Uzziah acted as a half-independent -vassal, united with him by common interests. The day for Assyria to -threaten Israel had not yet come. Syria lay in the path; and Assurdan -III. had been succeeded by Assurnirari, who gave the world the unusual -spectacle of a peaceful Assyrian king. - -Jeroboam II., therefore, was free to enlarge his domains; and unless -there be a little patriotic exaggeration in the extent and reality of -his prowess, he exercised at least a nominal suzerainty over a realm -nearly as extensive as that of David. He first advanced against -Damascus, and so far "recovered" it as to make it acknowledge his -rule.[307] His father Joash had won back all the Israelite cities -which Benhadad III. had taken from Jehoahaz; and Jeroboam, if he did -not absolutely reconquer the district east of Jordan, yet kept it in -check and repressed the predatory incursions of the Emirs of Moab and -Ammon.[308] He thus extended the border of Israel to the sea of the -Arabah and "the brook of willows" which divides Edom from Moab.[309] -But this was not all. He pushed his conquests two hundred miles -northwards of Samaria, and became lord of Hamath the Great. Ascending -the gorge of the Litany between the chains of Libanus and Antilibanus, -which formed the northern limit of Israel, and following the river to -its source near Baalbek, he then descended the Valley of the Orontes, -which constitutes the "pass" or "entering in" of Hamath. Hamath was a -town of the Hittites, the most powerful race of ancient Canaan. They -were not of Semitic origin, but spoke a separate language. They were -the last great branch of the once famous and dominant Khetas, whose -former importance has only recently been revealed by their deciphered -inscriptions. A century and a half earlier the Hamathites had thrown -off the yoke of Solomon, and they governed nearly a hundred dependent -cities. In alliance with the Phoenicians and Syrians, they had been -valuable members of a league, which, though defeated, had long formed -a barrier against the southward movement of the Assyrians. How -striking was the conquest of this city by Jeroboam is shown by the -title of "Hamath the Great," bestowed upon it by the contemporary -prophets,[310] with whom literary prophecy begins. - -The result of these conquests was unwonted peace. Agriculture once -more became possible, when the farmers of Israel were secure that -their crops would not be reaped by plundering Bedouin. Intercourse -with neighbouring nations was revived, as in the golden days of -Solomon, though it was regarded with suspicion.[311] Civilisation -softened something of the old brutality. Prophecy assumed a different -type, and literature began to dawn. - -But to this state of things there was, as we learn from the -contemporary prophets Amos and Hosea, a darker side. Of Jonah we know -nothing more; for it is impossible to see in the Book of Jonah much -more than a beautiful and edifying story, which may or may not rest on -some surviving legends. It differs from every other prophetic book by -beginning with the word "And," and its late origin and legendary -character cannot any longer be reasonably disputed.[312] We may hope, -therefore, that the Northern prophet, whose home was not far from -Nazareth, was not quite the morose and ruthless grumbler so strikingly -portrayed in the book which bears his name. Of any historical -intervention of his in the affairs of Jeroboam we know nothing further -than the recorded promise of the king's prosperity. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[305] 2 Kings xiv. 25-27. There are other allusions to the historic -events in 2 Kings x. 32, 33, xiii. 3-7, 22-25. Hitzig conjectures that -Isa. xv., xvi., are "a burden of Moab" quoted from Jonah. - -[306] 2 Kings xiii. 5, "The Lord gave Israel a saviour"; xiv. 27, "And -He saved them by the hand of Jeroboam, the son of Joash." Some suppose -the saviour to be the Assyrian King. - -[307] It had owned the feudal supremacy of David (2 Sam. viii. 6), and -Ahab had extorted the privilege of having bazaars there (1 Kings xx. -34). Considering how immense had been the resources of Damascus (2 -Kings vi. 14), which had once been able to send to battle twelve -thousand war-chariots (_Eponym Canon_, p. 108) under Benhadad, we see -how fearfully the Syrian capital must have been weakened. - -[308] If Isa. xv. 1, 2, refers to this invasion of Jeroboam II., as -Hitzig first conjectured, we infer that he had taken both Ar of Moab -(Rabbath) and Kir of Moab, a strong fortress on a hill, by night -assaults; and that he had also captured Dibon, Nebo, and Medeba, and -inflicted on them summary chastisement. It appears that the Moabites -had advanced northwards from the Arnon, while Hazael occupied -Ramoth-Gilead, and had seized part of the tribe of Reuben. Jeroboam -II. first expelled them, and then invaded their own proper country. -Hitzig conjectures that Isa. xv., xvi., are really an old -prophecy--perhaps by Jonah, son of Amittai--which Isaiah quotes, and -to which he adds two verses (Isa. xvi. 12, 13). In such overthrow Moab -must have learnt to be ashamed of Chemosh (Jer. xlviii. 13). - -[309] Isa. xv. 7; Amos vi. 14. - -[310] Amos vi. 2. - -[311] Merchandise had hitherto been considered discreditable for a -pure Jew, so that a trader is called a Canaanite (Hos. xii. 7, 8). - -[312] See the writer's _Minor Prophets_ ("Men of the Bible" Series), -pp. 231-243. - - - - - CHAPTER XVIII - - _AMOS, HOSEA, AND THE KINGDOM OF ISRAEL_ - - 2 KINGS xiv. 23-29; xv. 8-12 - - "In them is plainest taught and easiest learnt - What makes a nation happy and keeps it so, - What ruins kingdoms and lays cities flat." - MILTON, _Paradise Regained_. - - "We see dimly in the Present what is small and what is great, - Slow of faith how weak an arm may turn the iron helm of Fate: - But the soul is still oracular: amid the market's din - List the ominous stern whisper from the Delphic cave within, - 'They enslave their children's children who make compromise with - sin.'" - LOWELL. - - -Amos and Hosea are the two earliest prophets whose "burdens" have come -down to us. From them we gain a near insight into the internal -condition of Israel in this day of her prosperity. - -We see, first, that the prosperity was not unbroken. Though peace -reigned, the people were not left to lapse unwarned into sloth and -godlessness. The land had suffered from the horrible scourge of locusts, -until every _carmel_--every garden of God on hill and plain--withered -before them.[313] There had been widespread conflagrations;[314] there -had been a visitation of pestilence; and, finally, there had been an -earthquake so violent that it constituted an epoch from which dates -were reckoned.[315] There were also two eclipses of the sun, which -darkened with fear the minds of the superstitious.[316] - -Nor was this the worst. Civilisation and commerce had brought luxury in -their train, and all the bonds of morality had been relaxed. The country -began to be comparatively depleted, and the innocent regularity of -agricultural pursuits palled upon the young, who were seduced by the -glittering excitement of the growing towns. All zeal for religion was -looked on as archaic, and the splendour of formal services was regarded -as a sufficient recognition of such gods as there were. As a natural -consequence, the nobles and the wealthy classes were more and more -infected with a gross materialism, which displayed itself in -ostentatious furniture, and sumptuous palaces of precious marbles inlaid -with ivory. The desire for such vanities increased the thirst for gold, -and avarice replenished its exhausted coffers by grinding the faces of -the poor, by defrauding the hireling of his wages, by selling the -righteous for silver, the needy for handfuls of barley, and the poor for -a pair of shoes. The degrading vice of intoxication acquired fresh -vogue, and the gorgeous gluttonies of the rich were further disgraced by -the shameful spectacle of drunkards, who lolled for hours over the -revelries which were inflamed by voluptuous music. Worst of all, the -purity of family life was invaded and broken down. Throwing aside the -old veiled seclusion of women in Oriental life, the ladies of Israel -showed themselves in the streets in all "the bravery of their tinkling -ornaments of gold," and sank into the adulterous courses stimulated by -their pampered effrontery. - -Such is the picture which we draw from the burning denunciations of the -peasant-prophet of Tekoa. He was no prophet nor prophet's son, but a -humble gatherer of sycomore-fruit, a toil which only fell to the -humblest of the people.[317] Who is not afraid, he asks, when a lion -roars? and how can a prophet be silent when the Lord God has spoken? -Indignation had transformed and dilated him from a labourer into a seer, -and had summoned him from the pastoral shades of his native -village--whether in Judah or in Israel is uncertain--to denounce the -more flagrant iniquities of the Northern capital.[318] First he -proclaims the vengeance of Jehovah upon the transgressions of the -Philistines, of Tyre, of Edom, of Ammon, of Moab, and even of Judah; and -then he turns with a crash upon apostatising Israel.[319] He speaks with -unsparing plainness of their pitiless greed, their shameless debauchery, -their exacting usury, their attempts to pervert even the abstinent -Nazarites into intemperance, and to silence the prophets by opposition -and obloquy. Jehovah was crushed under their violence.[320] And did they -think to go unscathed after such black ingratitude? Nay! their mightiest -should flee away naked in the day of defeat. Robbery was in their houses -of ivory, and the few of them who should escape the spoiler should only -be as when a shepherd tears out of the mouth of a lion two legs and a -piece of an ear?[321] As for Bethel, their shrine--which he calls -Bethaven, "House of Vanity," not Bethel, "House of God"--the horns of -its altars should be cut off. Should oppression and licentiousness -flourish? Jehovah would take them with hooks, and their children with -fish-hooks, and their sacrifices at Bethel and Gilgal should be utterly -unavailing. Drought, and blasting, and mildew, and wasting plague, and -earth-convulsions like those which had swallowed Sodom and Gomorrha, -from which they should only be plucked as a "firebrand out of the -burning," should warn them that they must prepare to meet their -God.[322] It was lamentable; but lamentation was vain, unless they would -return to Jehovah, Lord of hosts,[323] and abandon the false worship of -Bethel, Beersheba, and Gilgal, and listen to the voice of the righteous, -whom they now abhorred for his rebukes. They talked hypocritically about -"the day of the Lord," but to them it should be blackness. They relied -on feast days, and services, and sacrifices; but since they would not -give the sacrifice of judgment and righteousness, for which alone God -cared, they should be carried into captivity beyond Damascus: yes! even -to that terrible Assyria with whose king they now were on friendly -terms. They lay at ease on their carved couches at their delicate -feasts, draining the wine-bowls, and glistering with fragrant oils, -heedless of the impending doom which would smite the great house with -breaches and the little house with clefts, and which should bring upon -them an avenger who should afflict them from their conquered Hamath -southwards even to the wady of the wilderness.[324] The threatened -judgments of locusts and fire had been mitigated at the prophet's -prayer, but nothing could avert the plumb-line of destruction which -Jehovah held over them, and He would rise against the House of Jeroboam -with His sword.[325] We infer from all that Amos and Hosea say that the -calf-worship at Bethel (for Dan is not mentioned in this connexion[326]) -had degenerated into an idolatry far more abject than it originally -was. The familiarity of such multitudes of the people with Baal-worship -and Asherah-worship had tended to obliterate the sense that the "calves" -were cherubic emblems of Jehovah; and were it not for some confusions of -this kind, it is inconceivable that Jehoram ben-Jehu should have -restored the Asherah which his father had removed. Be that as it may, -Bethel and Gilgal seem to have become centres of corruption. Dan is -scarcely once alluded to as a scene of the calf-worship. - -Others, then, might be deceived by the surface-glitter of extended -empire in the days of Jeroboam II. Not so the true prophets. It has -often happened--as to Persia, when, in B.C. 388, she dictated the -Peace of Antalcidas, and to Papal Rome in the days of the Jubilee of -1300, and to Philip II. of Spain in the year of the Armada, and to -Louis XIV. in 1667--that a nation has seemed to be at its zenith of -pomp and power on the very eve of some tremendous catastrophe. Amos -and Hosea saw that such a catastrophe was at hand for Israel, because -they knew that Divine punishment inevitably dogs the heels of -insolence and crime. The loftiness of Israel's privilege involved the -utterness of her ruin. "You only have I known of all the families of -the earth: therefore I will visit upon you all your iniquities."[327] - -Such prophecies, so eloquent, so uncompromising, so varied, and so -constantly disseminated among the people, first by public harangues, -then in writing, could no longer be neglected. Amos, with his natural -culture, his rhythmic utterances, and his inextinguishable fire, was far -different from the wild fanatics, with their hairy garments, and sudden -movements, and long locks, and cries, and self-inflicted wounds, with -whom Israel had been familiar since the days of Elijah whom they all -imitated. So long as this inspired peasant confined himself to moral -denunciations the aristocracy and priesthood of Samaria could afford -comfortably to despise him. What were moral denunciations to them? What -harm was there in ivory palaces and refined feasts? This man was a mere -red socialist who tried to undermine the customs of society. The hold of -the upper classes on the people, whom their exactions had burdened with -hopeless debt, and whom they could with impunity crush into slavery, was -too strong to be shaken by the "hysteric gush" of a philanthropic -faddist and temperance fanatic like this. But when he had the enormous -presumption to mention publicly the name of their victorious king, and -to say that Jehovah would rise against him with the sword, it was time -for the clergy to interfere, and to send the intruder back to his native -obscurity. - -So Amaziah, the priest of Bethel,[328] invoked the king's authority. -"Amos," he said to the king, "hath conspired against thee in the midst -of the house of Israel." The charge was grossly false, but it did well -enough to serve the priest's purpose. "The land is not able to bear -all his words." - -That was true; for when nations have chosen to abide by their own -vicious courses, and refuse to listen to the voice of warning, they -are impatient of rebuke. They refuse to hear when God calls to them. - - "For when we in our viciousness grow hard, - Oh misery on it! the wise gods seal our eyes; - In our own filth drop our clear judgments; make us - Adore our errors; laugh at us while we strut - To our confusion." - -The priest tried further to inflame the king's anger by telling him -two more of Amos's supposed predictions. He had prophesied (which was -a false inference) that Israel should be led away captive out of their -own land,[329] and had also prophesied (which was a perversion of the -fact) "that Jeroboam _should die_ by the sword." - -At the first prophecy Jeroboam probably smiled. It might indeed come -true in the long-run. If he was a man of prescience as well as of -prowess, he probably foresaw that the elements of ruin lurked in his -transient success, and that though, for the present, Assyria was -occupied in other directions, it was unlikely that the weaker Israel -would escape the fate of the far more powerful Syria. As for the -personal prophecy, he was strong, and was honoured, and had his army -and his guards. He would take his chance. Nor does it seem to have -troubled any one that Amos looked for the ultimate union of Israel -with Judah. Since the time of Joash the inheritance of David had been -but as "a ruined booth" (ix. 11); but Amos prophesied its restoration. -This touch may have been added later, when he wrote and published his -"burdens"; but he did not hesitate to speak as if the two kingdoms -were really and properly one.[330] - -We are not told that Jeroboam II. interfered with the prophet in any -way.[331] Had he done so, he would have been rebuked and denounced for -it. He probably went no further than to allow the priest and the -prophet to settle the matter between themselves. Perhaps he gave a -contemptuous permission that, if Amaziah thought it worth while to -send the prophet back into Judah, he might do so. - -Armed with this nonchalant mandate, Amaziah, with more mildness and -good-humour than might have been expected from one of his class, said -to Amos, "O Seer,[332] go home, and eat thy bread, and prophesy to thy -heart's content at home; but do not prophesy any more at Bethel, for -it is the king's sanctuary and the king's court." - -Amos obeyed perforce, but stopped to say that he had not prophesied -out of his own mouth, but by Jehovah's bidding. He then hurled at the -priest a message of doom as frightful as that which Jeremiah -pronounced upon Pashur, when that priest smote him on the face. His -wife should be a harlot in the city; his sons and daughters should be -slain; his inheritance should be divided; he should die in a polluted -land; and Israel should go into captivity. And as for his mission, he -justified it by the fact that he was not one of an hereditary or a -professional community; he was no prophet or prophet's son. Such men -might--like Zedekiah, the son of Chenaanah, and his four hundred -abettors--be led into mere function and professionalism, into -manufactured enthusiasm and simulated inspiration. From such -communities freshness, unconventionality, courage, were hardly to be -expected. They would philippise at times; they would get to love their -order and their privileges better than their message, and themselves -best of all. It is the tendency of organised bodies to be tempted into -conventionality, and to sink into banded unions chiefly concerned in -the protection of their own prestige. Not such was Amos. He was a -peasant herdsman in whose heart had burned the inspiration of Jehovah -and the wrath against moral misdoing till they had burst into flame. -It was indignation against iniquity which had called Amos from the -flocks and the sycomores to launch against an apostatising people the -menace of doom. In that grief and indignation he heard the voice and -received the mandate of the Lord of hosts. He heads the long line of -literary prophets whose priceless utterances are preserved in the Old -Testament. The inestimable value of their teaching lies most of all in -the fact that they were--like Moses--preachers of the moral law; and -that, like the Book of the Covenant, which is the most ancient and the -most valuable part of the Laws of the Pentateuch, they count external -service as no better than the small dust of the balance in comparison -with righteousness and true holiness. - -The rest of the predictions of Amos were added at a later date. They -dwelt on the certainty and the awful details of the coming overthrow; -the doom of the idolaters of Gilgal and Beersheba; the inevitable -swiftness of the catastrophe in which Samaria should be sifted like -corn in a sieve in spite of her incorrigible security.[333] Yet the -ruin should not be absolute. "Thus saith Jehovah: As the shepherd -teareth out of the mouth of the lion two legs and the piece of an ear, -so shall the children of Israel be rescued, that sit in Samaria on the -corner of a couch, and on the damask of a bed." - -The Hebrew Prophets almost invariably weave together the triple strands -of warning, exhortation, and hope. Hitherto Amos has not had a word of -hope to utter. At last, however, he lets a glimpse of the rainbow -irradiate the gloom. The overthrow of Israel should be accompanied by -the restoration of the fallen booth of David, and, under the rule of a -scion of that house, Israel should return from captivity to enjoy days -of peaceful happiness, and to be rooted up no more.[334] - - * * * * * - -Hosea, the son of Beeri, was of a somewhat later date than Amos. He, -too, "became electric," to flash into meaner and corrupted minds the -conviction that formalism is nothing, and that moral sincerity is all -in all. That which God requires is not ritual service, but truth in -the inward parts. He is one of the saddest of the prophets; but -though he mingles prophecies of mercy with his menaces of wrath, the -general tenor of his oracles is the same. He pictures the crimes of -Ephraim by the image of domestic unfaithfulness, and bids Judah to -take warning from the curse involved in her apostasy.[335] Many of his -allusions touch upon the days of that deluge of anarchy which followed -the death of Jeroboam II. (iv.-vi. 3). That he was a Northerner -appears from the fact that he speaks of the King of Israel as "our -king" (vii. 5). Yet he seems to blame the revolt of Jeroboam I. (i. -11, viii. 4), although a prophet had originated it, and he openly -aspires after the reunion of the Twelve Tribes under a king of the -House of David (iii. 5). He points more distinctly to Assyria, which -he frequently names as the scourge of the Divine vengeance, and -indicates how vain is the hope of the party which relied on the -alliance of Egypt.[336] He speaks with far more distinct contempt of -the cherub at Bethel and the shrine at Gilgal, and says scornfully, -"Thy calf, O Samaria, has cast thee off."[337] Shalmaneser had taken -Beth-Arbel, and dashed to pieces mother and children. Such would be -the fate of the cities of Israel.[338] Yet Hosea, like Amos, cannot -conclude with words of wrath and woe, and he ends with a lovely song -of the days when Ephraim should be restored, after her true -repentance, by the loving tenderness of God. - -Jeroboam II. must have been aware of some at least of these prophecies. -Those of Hosea must have impressed him all the more because Hosea was a -prophet of his own kingdom, and all of his allusions were to such -ancient and famous shrines of Ephraim as Mizpeh, Tabor, Bethel, Gilgal, -Shechem,[339] Jezreel, and Lebanon. He was the Jeremiah of the North, -and a passionate patriotism breathes through his melancholy strains. Yet -in the powerful rule of Jeroboam II. he can only see a godless -militarism founded upon massacre (i. 4), and he felt himself to be the -prophet of decadence. Page after page rings with wailing, and with -denunciations of drunkenness, robbery, and whoredom--"swearing, lying, -killing, stealing, and adultery" (iv. 2). - -If Jeroboam was as wise and great as he seemed to have been, he must -have seen with his own eyes the ominous clouds on the far horizon, and -the deep-seated corruption which was eating like a cancer into the -heart of his people. Probably, like many another great sovereign--like -Marcus Aurelius when he noted the worthlessness of his son Commodus, -like Charlemagne when he burst into tears at the sight of the ships of -the Vikings--his thoughts were like those of the ancient and modern -proverbs--"When I am dead, let earth be mixed with fire." We have no -trace that Jeroboam treated Hosea as did those guilty priests to whom -he was a rebuke, and who called him "a fool" and "mad" (ix. 7, 8, iv. -6-8, v. 2). Yet the aged king--he must have reached the unusual age -of seventy-three at least, before he ended the longest and most -successful reign in the annals of Israel--could hardly have -anticipated that within half a year of his death his secure throne -would be shaken to its foundation, his dynasty be hurled into -oblivion, and that Israel, to whom, as long as he lived, mighty -kingdoms had curtsied, should, - - "Like a forlorn and desperate castaway, - Do shameful execution on herself." - -Yet so it was. Jeroboam II. was succeeded by no less than six other -kings, but he was the last who died a natural death. Every one of his -successors fell a victim to the assassin or the conqueror. His son -Zachariah ("Remembered by Jehovah") succeeded him (B.C. 740), the -fourth in descent from Jehu. Considering the long reign of his father, -he must have ascended the throne at a mature age. But he was the child -of evil times. That he should not interrupt the "calf"-worship was a -matter of course; but if he be the king of whom we catch a glimpse in -Hos. vii. 2-7, we see that he partook deeply of the depravity of his -day. We are there presented with a deplorable picture. There was -thievishness at home, and bands of marauding bandits began to appear -from abroad. The king was surrounded by a desperate knot of wicked -counsellors, who fooled him to the top of his bent, and corrupted him -to the utmost of his capacity. They were all scorners and adulterers, -whose furious passions the prophet compares to the glowing heat of an -oven heated by the baker. They made the king glad with their -wickedness, and the princes with lying flatteries. On the royal -birthday, apparently at some public feast, this band of infamous -revellers, who were the boon companions of Zachariah, first made him -sick with bottles of wine, and then having set an ambush in waiting, -murdered the effeminate and self-indulgent debauchee before all the -people.[340] The scene reads like the assassination of a Commodus or -an Elagabalus. No one was likely to raise a hand in his favour. Like -our Edward II., he was a weakling who followed a great and warlike -father. It was evident that troublous times were near at hand, and -nothing but the worst disasters could ensue if there was no one better -than such a drunkard as Zachariah to stand at the helm of state. - -So did the dynasty of the mighty Jehu expire like a torch blown out in -stench and smoke. - -Its close is memorable most of all because it evoked the magnificent -moral and spiritual teaching of Hebrew prophecy. The ideal prophet and -the ordinary priest are as necessarily opposed to each other as the -saint and the formalist. The glory of prophecy lies in its recognition -that right is always right, and wrong always wrong, apart from all -expediency and all casuistry, apart from "all prejudices, private -interests, and partial affections." "What Jehovah demands," they -taught, "is righteousness--neither more nor less; what He hates is -injustice. Sin or offence to the Deity is a thing of purely moral -character. Morality is that for the sake of which all other things -exist; it is the most essential element of all sincere religion. It is -no postulate, no idea, but a necessity and a fact; the most intensely -living of human powers--Jehovah, the God of hosts. In wrath, in ruin, -this holy reality makes its existence known; it annihilates all that -is hollow and false."[341] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[313] Amos vii. 1. Famine (iv. 6); drought (iv. 7, 8); yellow blight and -locusts (iv. 9); pestilence (iv. 10); earthquake and burning (iv. 11). - -[314] Amos vii. 4. - -[315] Amos i. 1, iii. 14, iv. 11, viii 8; Zech. xiv. 5: "Ye shall flee -like as ye fled before the earthquake in the days of Uzziah." Josephus -says that in an earthquake a little before the birth of Christ ten -thousand were buried under the ruined houses (_Antt._, XV. v. 2), and -he has many Rabbinic haggadoth to tell us about the earthquake, which, -he says, happened at the moment when Uzziah burnt incense in the -Temple (_Antt._, IX. x. 4). - -[316] According to Hind, they took place on June 15th, B.C. 763, and -February 9th, B.C. 784. Amos alludes to the capture of Gath by Uzziah, -of Calneh (_Ktesiphon_), and of Hamath (vi. 2; 2 Chron. xxvi. 6). Gath -henceforth disappears from the Philistian Pentapolis (Amos i. 7, 8; -Zeph. ii. 4; Zech. ix. 5). - -[317] Or "dresser of sycomore-trees" (R.V.). LXX., [Greek: knizon -sykamina]; Vulg., _vellicans sycomoros_. The sycomore-fruit (fruit of -the _Ficus sycomorus_, or wild fig) is ripened by puncturing it -(Theoph., _H. Plant._, iv. 2; Pliny, _H. N._, xiii. 14). - -[318] The well-known town of Tekoa had been Solomon's horse-fair, and -had been fortified by Rehoboam (2 Chron. xi. 6). It lay in a wild -country six miles south of Bethlehem (2 Chron. xx. 20; 1 Macc. ix. 33; -Robinson, _Bibl. Res._, i. 486). For a fuller account of these -prophets, I must refer to my book on _The Minor Prophets_ in the "Men -of the Bible" Series. It has always been assumed that Amos belonged to -the well-known Tekoa, and was therefore a subject of the Southern -Kingdom. In recent days this has become uncertain. No sycomores grow -or can grow on the bleak uplands of Tekoa (Tristram, _Nat. Hist. of -the Bible_, p. 397); so that Jerome, in his preface to Amos, thinks -that "brambles" are intended. Even Kimchi conjectured that Tekoa was -an unknown town in the tribe of Asher. Amos's allusions to scenery are -all applicable to the Northern landscape. - -[319] Amos i. 1-ii. 5. - -[320] Amos ii. 6-13. - -[321] Amos iii. 9-15. - -[322] Amos iv. 1-13. - -[323] This title, "Jehovah-Tsebaoth," now begins to occur. It is not -found in the Hexateuch. It probably means "Lord of the _starry hosts_." -Contact with Assyria first made the Israelites acquainted with -star-worship. Amos alludes to the Pleiades and Orion (v. 8: comp. Job -ix. 9, xxxviii. 31). Star-worship is forbidden in Deuteronomy. In Amos -v. 26 the true meaning is that the Israelites _would take with them, on -their road to exile_, Sakkuth (Moloch?) and Kewan (the god-star Saturn). - -[324] Amos vi. 1-14. - -[325] Amos vii. 1-9. - -[326] Strange as it may seem, the early authority for the existence of -any calf at Dan is very slight, and the extreme uncertainty of the -reading and interpretation in one main passage (1 Kings xii. 32) makes -it at least possible that there were _two calves at Bethel_, and that -at Dan there was no calf, but only the old idolatrous ephod of Micah, -still served by the servant of Moses. See additional note at the end -of the volume. - -[327] Amos iii. 2. - -[328] That the chief priest of Bethel bore the name "Jehovah is -strong" shows once more that "calf-worship" was in no sense a -_substitute_ for the worship of Jehovah. - -[329] This was not quite accurate; he had rather prophesied the -devastation of the high places (vii. 9). In fact, his words had often -been very vague. "_Thus_ will I do unto thee" (iv. 12). - -[330] Amos ix. 11-15. Comp. Hos. iii. 5. - -[331] The exaggerated haggadoth of later days say that Amaziah had -Amos beaten with leaded thongs, and that he was carried home in a -dying state (Epiphan., _Opp._, ii. 145), to which there is a supposed -allusion in Heb. xi. 35: [Greek: alloi de etumpanisthesan]. - -[332] We cannot be sure that the term "Seer" was meant to be -contemptuous, although from 1 Sam. ix. 9 we should infer that the -title had become somewhat obsolete. Further, we must bear in mind that -it may not have been always easy for worldlings to distinguish between -true prophets and the unprincipled pretenders who, about this time, -succeeded in making the name and aspect of a prophet so complete a -disgrace that men had carefully to disclaim it (Zech. xiii. 2-6). It -is true that the heading of Amos (i. 1), which may not, however, be by -the prophet himself, tells us of "the words which he _saw_" (_i.e._, -spoke as a seer), and he also disclaims the name of prophet (vii. 14). - -[333] Amos viii. 1-ix. 9, 10. - -[334] Amos ix. 11-15. - -[335] Hos. iv. 15-19. - -[336] Hos. v. 13, vii. 11, viii. 9, ix. 3-6, xi. 5, xii. 1, xiv. 3. It -must be borne in mind that the cuneiform inscriptions prove that -Assyria had burst into sight like a lurid comet on the horizon far -earlier than we had supposed. Jehu had paid tribute to Shalmaneser as -far back as B.C. 842, more than a century before Menahem's tribute in -738. The destruction which Hosea prophesied took place within -thirty-one years of his prophecies--probably in B.C. 722, when Sargon -finished the siege of Samaria begun by Shalmaneser. The king Hoshea -was perhaps taken captive before the siege. - -[337] Hos. viii. 5, ix. 15. - -[338] Hos. x. 13, 14. - -[339] Hos. vi. 9: for "by consent" read "towards Shechem." - -[340] Hos. vii. 3-7. The allusions are vague, but we see a drunken -king among his drunken princes, surrounded by wicked plotters who have -flattered his vices. He is ignorant of his peril. The subjects aid the -rulers in these abominations. All are blazing, like an oven, with -passion and infamy, and only rest (as the baker does) to acquire new -strength for inflaming their burning desires. At the dawn their -treachery blazes into the crime of murder, and in the wine-sick -fever-heat of the banquet the king is murdered by his corrupt -intimates (see my _Minor Prophets_, p. 78). - -[341] Wellhausen, _Isr. and Jud._, 85. - - - - - CHAPTER XIX - - _AZARIAH-UZZIAH_ (B.C. 783(?)-737) - - _JOTHAM_ (B.C. 737-735) - - 2 KINGS xv. 1-7, 32-38 - - "This is vanity, and it is a sore sickness."--ECCLES. vi. 2. - - -Before we watch the last "glimmerings and decays" of the Northern -Kingdom, we must once more revert to the fortunes of the House of David. -Judah partook of the better fortunes of Israel. She, too, enjoyed the -respite caused by the crippling of the power of Syria, and the cessation -from aggression of the Assyrian kings, who, for a century, were either -unambitious monarchs like Assurdan, or were engaged in fighting on their -own northern and eastern frontiers. Judah, too, like Israel, was happy -in the long and wise governance of a faithful king. - -This king was Azariah ("My strength is Jehovah"), the son of Amaziah. He -is called Uzziah by the Chronicler, and in some verses of the brief -references to his long reign in the Book of Kings. It is not certain -that he was the eldest son of Amaziah;[342] but he was so distinctly the -ablest, that, at the age of sixteen, he was chosen king by "all the -people." His official title to the world must have been Azariah, for in -that form his name occurs in the Assyrian records. Uzziah seems to have -been the more familiar title which he bore among his people.[343] There -seems to be an allusion to both names--Jehovah-his-helper, and -Jehovah-his-strength--in the Chronicles: "God _helped him_, and made him -to prosper; and his name spread far abroad, and he was marvellously -helped, _till he was strong_." - -The Book of Kings only devotes a few verses to him; but from the -Chronicler we learn much more about his prosperous activity. His first -achievement was to recover and fortify the port of Elath, on the Red -Sea,[344] and to reduce the Edomites to the position they had held in -the earlier days of his father's reign. This gave security to his -commerce, and at once "his name spread far abroad, even to the -entering in of Egypt." - -He next subdued the Philistines; took Gath, Jabneh, and Ashdod; -dismantled their fortifications, filled them with Hebrew colonists, -and "smote all Palestine with a rod."[345] - -He then chastised the roving Arabs of the Negeb or south country in -Gur-Baal and Maon, and suppressed their plundering incursions. - -His next achievement was to reduce the Ammonite Emirs to the position -of tributaries, and to enforce from them rights of pasturage for his -large flocks, not only in the low country (_shephelah_), but in the -southern wilderness (_midbar_), and in the _carmels_ or fertile -grounds among the Trans-Jordanic hills. - -Having thus subdued his enemies on all sides, he turned his attention -to home affairs--built towers, strengthened the walls of Jerusalem at -its most assailable points, provided catapults and other instruments -of war, and rendered a permanent benefit to Jerusalem by irrigation -and the storing of rain-water in tanks. - -All these improvements so greatly increased his wealth and importance -that he was able to renew David's old force of heroes (Gibborim), and to -increase their number from six hundred to two thousand six hundred, whom -he carefully enrolled, equipped with armour, and trained in the use of -engines of war. And he not only extended his boundaries southwards and -eastwards, but appears to have been strong enough, after the death of -Jeroboam II., to make an expedition northwards, and to have headed a -Syrian coalition against Tiglath-Pileser III., in B.C. 738. He is -mentioned in two notable fragments of the annals of the eighth year of -this Assyrian king. He is there called Azrijahu, and both his forces and -those of Hamath seem to have suffered a defeat.[346] - -It is distressing to find that a king so good and so great ended his -days in overwhelming and irretrievable misfortune. The glorious reign -had a ghastly conclusion. All that the historian tells us is that "the -Lord smote the king, so that he was a leper, and dwelt in a several -[_i.e._, a separate] house." The word rendered "a several house" may -perhaps mean (as in the margin of the A.V.) "a lazar house," like the -_Beit el Massakin_ or "house of the unfortunate," the hospital or -abode of lepers, outside the walls of Jerusalem.[347] The rendering is -uncertain, but it is by no means impossible that the prevalence of the -affliction had, even in those early days, created a retreat for those -thus smitten, especially as they formed a numerous class. Obviously -the king could no more fulfil his royal duties. A leper becomes a -horrible object, and no one would have been more anxious than the -unhappy Azariah himself to conceal his aspect from the eyes of his -people.[348] His son Jotham was set over the household; and though he -is not called a regent or joint-king--for this institution does not -seem to have existed among the ancient Hebrews--he acted as judge over -the people of the land. - -We are told that Isaiah wrote the annals of this king's reign, but we -do not know whether it was from Isaiah's biography that the Chronicler -took the story of the manner in which Uzziah was smitten with leprosy. -The Chronicler says that his heart was puffed up with his successes -and his prosperity, and that he was consequently led to thrust himself -into the priest's office by burning incense in the Temple.[349] -Solomon appears to have done the same without the least question of -opposition; but now the times were changed, and Azariah, the high -priest,[350] and eighty of his colleagues went in a body to prevent -Uzziah, to rebuke him, and to order him out of the Holy Place.[351] -The opposition kindled him into the fiercest anger, and at this moment -of hot altercation the red spot of leprosy suddenly rose and burned -upon his forehead. The priests looked with horror on the fatal sign; -and the stricken king, himself horrified at this awful visitation of -God, ceased to resist the priests, and rushed forth to relieve the -Temple of his unclean presence, and to linger out the sad remnant of -his days in the living death of that most dishonouring disease. Surely -no man was ever smitten down from the summits of splendour to a lower -abyss of unspeakable calamity! We can but trust that the misery only -laid waste the few last years of his reign; for Jotham was twenty-five -when he began to reign, and he must have been more than a mere boy -when he was set to perform his father's duties. - -So the glory of Uzziah faded into dust and darkness. At the age of -sixty-eight death came as the welcome release from his miseries, and -"they buried him with his fathers in the City of David." The -Levitically scrupulous Chronicler adds that he was not laid in the -actual sepulchre of his fathers, but in a field of burial which -belonged to them--"for they said, He is a leper." The general outline -of his reign resembled that of his father's. It began well; it fell by -pride; it closed in misery. - -The annals of his son Jotham were not eventful, and he died at the age -of forty-one or earlier. He is said to have reigned sixteen years, but -there are insuperable difficulties about the chronology of his reign, -which can only be solved by hazardous conjectures.[352] He was a good -king, "howbeit the high places were not removed." The Chronicler -speaks of him chiefly as a builder. He built or restored the northern -gate of the Temple, and defended Judah with fortresses and towns. But -the glory and strength of his father's reign faded away under his -rule. He did indeed suppress a revolt of the Ammonites, and exacted -from them a heavy indemnity; but shortly afterwards the inaction of -Assyria led to an alliance between Pekah, King of Israel, and Rezin, -King of Damascus; and these kings harassed Jotham--perhaps because he -refused to become a member of their coalition. The good king must also -have been pained by the signs of moral degeneracy all around him in -the customs of his own people. It was "in the year that King Uzziah -died" that Isaiah saw his first vision, and he gives us a deplorable -picture of contemporary laxity. Whatever the king may have been, the -princes were no better than "rulers of Sodom," and the people were -"people of Gomorrha." There was abundance of lip-worship, but little -sincerity; plentiful religionism, but no godliness. Superstition went -hand in hand with formalism, and the scrupulosity of outward service -was made a substitute for righteousness and true holiness. This was -the deadliest characteristic of this epoch, as we find it portrayed in -the first chapter of Isaiah. The faithful city had become a -harlot--but not in outward semblance. She "reflected heaven on her -surface, and hid Gomorrha in her heart." Righteousness had dwelt in -her--but now murderers; but the murderers wore phylacteries, and for a -pretence made long prayers. It was this deep-seated hypocrisy, this -pretence of religion without the reality, which called forth the -loudest crashes of Isaiah's thunder. There is more hope for a country -avowedly guilty and irreligious than for one which makes its -scrupulous ceremonialism a cloak of maliciousness. And thus there lay -at the heart of Isaiah's message that protest for bare morality, as -constituting the end and the essence of religion, which we find in all -the earliest and greatest prophets:-- - - "Hear the word of the Lord, ye rulers of Sodom; - Give ear unto the Law of our God, ye people of Gomorrha! - To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith - the Lord. - I am full of the burnt-offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; - And I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of - he-goats. - When ye come to see My face, who hath required this at your hands, to - trample My courts? - Bring no more vain oblations! - Incense is an abomination unto Me: - New moon and sabbath, the calling of assemblies-- - I cannot away with iniquity and the solemn meeting... - Wash you! make you clean!"[353] - -Of Jotham we hear nothing more. He died a natural death at an early -age. If the years of his reign are counted from the time when his -father's affliction devolved on him the responsibilities of office, it -is probable that he did not long survive the illustrious leper, but -was buried soon after him in the City of David his father. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[342] Hence, perhaps, the expression that the people "took him." If -Amaziah died at fifty-nine, he probably had other sons. - -[343] Compare the interchange of the names Azariel and Uzziel (Exod. -vi. 18) in 1 Chron. vi. 2, 18. Azariah means "Jehovah hath helped," -and Uzziah "Strength of Jehovah." It is just possible that his name -was changed at his accession, as the chief priest also was named -Azariah, and confusion might otherwise have arisen. - -[344] 2 Chron. xxvi. 2-15. - -[345] Isa. xiv. 29. A mixed language arose in this district in -consequence (Neh. xiii. 24; Zech. ix. 6). The word Palestine only -applies strictly to the district of Philistia. Milton uses it, with -his usual accuracy, in the description of Dagon as - - "That twice-battered god of Palestine." - -[346] Uzziah's opposition to Assyria--of which there seems to be no -doubt, for he must be the Azrijahu of the _Eponym Canon_--took place -about 738, and was a coalition movement. But it gives rise to great -chronological and other difficulties. As the solution of these is at -present only conjectural, I refer to Schrader (E. Tr.), ii. 211-219. -He is called Azrijahu Jahudai. - -[347] 2 Kings xv. 5 (2 Chron. xxvi. 21, "a house of sickness"). LXX., -[Greek: en oiko aphphousoth]; Vulg., _in domo libera seorsim_. Comp -Lev. xiii. 46. Theodoret understands it that he was shut up privately -in his own palace: [Greek: endon en thalamo hyp' oudenos horomenos]. -Symmachus, [Greek: egkekleismenos]. - -[348] His misfortune must have made a deep impression, and is possibly -alluded to in Hos. iv. 4: "For thy people are as they that strive with -the priest." - -[349] The Chronicler attributes the good part of his reign to the -influence of an unknown Zechariah, "who had understanding in the visions -of God"; and says that when Zechariah died Uzziah altered for the worse. - -[350] This high priest, Azariah, is only mentioned elsewhere in 2 -Chron. xxvi. 17, 20. - -[351] Josephus says that he had put on a priestly robe, and that a -great feast was going on, and that the earthquake (Amos i. 1; Zech. -xiv. 5) happened at the moment, which broke the Temple roof, so that a -sunbeam smote his head and produced the leprosy. We here see the -growth of the Haggadah. - -[352] For instance, two verses earlier (2 Kings xv. 30) we read of the -twentieth year of Jotham. - -[353] Isa. i. 10-17. - - - - - CHAPTER XX. - - _THE AGONY OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM._ - - B.C. - Shallum 740 - Menahem 740-737 - Pekahiah 737-735 - Pekah 735-734 - - 2 KINGS xv. 8-31 - - "Blood toucheth blood."--HOS. iv. 2. - - "The revolters are profuse in murders."--HOS. v. 2. - - "They have set up kings, but not by Me: they have made princes, - and I knew it not."--HOS. viii. 4. - - "Non tam reges fuere quam fures, latrones, et tyranni."--WITSIUS, - _Decaph._, 326. - - -With the death of Zachariah begins the acute agony of Israel's -dissolution. Four kings were murdered in forty years. Indeed, within -two centuries, at least nine kings--Nadab, Elah, Zimri, Tibni, -Jehoram, Zachariah, Shallum, Pekahiah, Pekah--had made the steps of -the throne slippery with blood. Except in the house of Omri, all the -kings of Israel either left no sons or left them to be slain. Amos, by -his vision of the basket of summer fruit, had intimated that the sins -of Israel were ripe for punishment, and the lesson had been emphasised -by the paronomasia of _quits_, "summer," and _queets_, "end."[354] The -prophet had singled four out of many crimes as the cause of her ruin. -They were (1) greedy oppression of the poor; (2) land-grabbing; (3) -licentious and idolatrous revelries; (4) cruelty to poor debtors, and -rioting on the proceeds of unjust gains. In their drunkenness they -even tempted God's Nazarites to break their vows. "Behold," saith -Jehovah, "I am pressed under you, as a cart is pressed that is full of -sheaves." Even women shared in the common intoxication, and showed -themselves utterly shameless, so that Amos contemptuously calls them -"fat cows of Bashan upon the mountain of Samaria," whom in punishment -the brutal conqueror should drag by the hair out of their ivory -palaces, as a fisherman drags his prey out of the water by hooks.[355] - -Shallum, son of Jabesh, the unknown murderer of Zachariah and the -usurper of his throne, suffered the fate of Zimri, and only reigned for -one month. If his conspiracy was marked by the odious circumstances of -treachery and corruption, which we infer from the allusions of Hosea, -Shallum richly deserved the swift retribution which fell upon him. He -seems to have destroyed Zachariah by means of his best affections--under -the guise of friendship, in the midst of boon companionship. But the -slayer of his master had no peace, and from the moment of his fruitless -crime the unhappy country seems to have been plunged in the horrors of -civil war. Some dim glimpses of the evils of the day are gained from the -earlier Zechariah,[356] just as some dim glimpses of the horrors of Rome -in the days of the later Caesars may be seen in the Apocalypse. The -prophet speaks of three shepherds cut off in one month, who abhorred -God, and His soul was impatient at them.[357] - -Just as Galba, Otho, and Vitellius flit across the stage of the Empire -amid war and assassinations, so Zachariah and Shallum are swept away by -"dagger-thrusts through the purple." Was there a third? Ewald and others -think that they detect a shadowy outline of him and of his name in 2 -Kings xv. 10. If so, his name was Kobolam, but we know no more of him -beyond the fact that "he was, and is not." For the sacred annals are but -little concerned with this bloody phantasmagoria of feeble kings, who -ruled amid usurpation, anarchy, hostile attacks from without, and civil -war within. "Israel," said Hosea, "hath cast off the thing that is good: -the enemy shall pursue him. They have set up kings, but not by Me: they -have made princes, and I knew it not." "They are all as hot as an oven, -and have devoured their judges; all their kings have fallen; there is -none among them that calleth upon Me."[358] - -It was perhaps during this distracted epoch that for one moment there -was an attempt to place the ruling authority of the nation in the -hands of the prophet himself. So it would appear from Zech. xi. 7-14. -Of course these chapters may be allegorical throughout, as, in any -case, they are in great part. But if so, it becomes more difficult to -understand the meaning. What the prophet says is as follows:-- - -First, as though he saw the terrible conflagration of the Assyrian -tyranny rolling southwards, and felt it to be irresistible, he bids -Lebanon open her doors, that the fire may devour her cedars. There is -perhaps an allusion to the death of Jeroboam II. in the words, "Howl -fir tree, for the cedar is fallen." He sees in vision the forces of -devastation raging among the oaks of Bashan, the forest and the -vintage, while the shepherds cry, and the ousted lions roar in vain. -Then Jehovah bids him feed "the flock of the slaughter"--the flock -sold remorselessly by its rich possessors, and slain, and left -unpitied, as the people were despoiled by its nobles and its kings. -The prophet undertakes the charge of the miserable flock, and takes -two staves, one of which he calls "Prosperity," and the other "Union." -While he was thus engaged three shepherds were cut off in one -month,[359] whom he loathed, and who abhorred him. But he finds his -task hopeless, and flings it up; and in sign that his covenant with -the people is broken, he breaks his staff "Prosperity." The nation -refused to pay him anything for his services, except a paltry sum of -thirty pieces of silver, and these he disdainfully flung into the -sacred treasury.[360] Then seeing that all hope of union between -Israel and Judah was at an end, he broke his staff "Union." Lastly, -Jehovah says He will raise up a foolish, neglectful, cruel shepherd -who would care for nothing but to eat the flesh of the fat and break -the hoofs of the flock. And as for this worthless shepherd, the sword -should be upon his arm and in his right eye; his arm shall be dried -up, and his right eye utterly darkened. - -By this cruel and self-seeking shepherd is probably meant Menahem. He -had been, according to Josephus, the captain of the guard, and was -living at Tirzah, the old beautiful capital of the land. From Tirzah, -where he occupied the position of the captain of the chariots, he -marched on the ill-supported Shallum. Samaria apparently offered no -protection to the usurper. Menahem defeated him and put him to death. -Then he proceeded to enforce the allegiance of the rest of the -country. An otherwise unknown town of the name of Tiphsach[361] -ventured to resist him. Menahem conquered it, and perhaps thinking, as -Machiavelli thought, that princes had better exhibit their utmost -cruelty at first, to deter any further opposition, he let loose his -ferocity on the town in a way which created a shuddering remembrance. -As though he had been one of the ferocious heathen, who had never been -restrained by the knowledge of God, he exhibited the extreme of -callous brutality by ripping up all the women that were with -child.[362] In this he followed the remorseless example of Hazael. -Hosea had prophesied that this should be the fate of Samaria;[363] -Amos had denounced the Ammonites for acting thus in the cities of -Gilead;[364] Shalmaneser III. had, in B.C. 732, thus avenged himself -on the resistance of Beth-Arbel,[365] and Assyria was ultimately to -meet an analogous retribution,[366] as also was Babylon.[367] But that -a king of Ephraim, of God's chosen people, should act thus to his own -brethren was a horrible portent, ominous of swift destruction. - -And the vengeance came. Menahem reigned, at least in name, for ten -years; for the sword which had slain mothers with their unborn infants -reduced the stricken people to terrified silence. But at this epoch -Assyria woke once more from her lethargy, and became the scourge of God -to the guilty people and their guiltier kings. For a whole century the -Assyrians had either been governed by kings who had abjured the lust of -blood and conquest, or had been too seriously occupied on their own -eastern and northern frontiers to intermeddle with the southern -kingdoms, or break down the barriers erected by the confederacy of -Hamath and Damascus between Nineveh and the weaker principalities of -Palestine. But now (B.C. 745) there came to the throne a king who, in -Chaldaea, was known by the name of Pul, and in Assyria by the name of -Tiglath-Pileser;[368] and being too formidable for any power to stay his -path, he marched against Menahem. Already he was lord of the world from -the Caspian to the Gulf of Persia; already he had subdued Babylonia, -Elam, Media, Armenia, eastward--Mesopotamia and Syria westward. Who was -Menahem, the petty usurper of a tenth-rate kingdom, that he should -withstand his power or even retard his advance? - -The cruel usurper was in no condition to resist him. The brand of Cain -was on him and his kingdom. How could the weak, impoverished, harassed -troops of Israel stand up in battle against those numberless serried -ranks, or withstand their tremendous discipline? If the very name of -Persia once struck terror into the brave Greeks before the spell of -Persian ascendency was broken at Marathon, Thermopylae, and Salamis, -much more did the name of Assyria make the hearts of the wretched -Israelites melt like water. They now for the first time saw those -bearded warriors with their broad swords, their tremendous bows, their -fierce, sensual faces, their thickset figures. In the language of the -prophets we still hear the echo of the fears which they excited by -their swift, unfaltering marches, their sleepless vigilance, their -girded loins, stout sandals, and barbed arrows.[369] - -"Their horses' hoofs," says Isaiah, "shall be like flint, and their -wheels like a whirlwind: their roaring shall be like a lion, they -shall roar like young lions; yea, they shall roar, and lay hold of the -prey, and carry it away safe, and there shall be none to deliver. And -they shall roar against them in that day like the roaring of the sea; -and if one look unto the land, behold darkness and distress, and the -light is darkened in the clouds thereof." - -Ancient Assyria lay beneath the Snowy Mountains of Kurdistan; and its -capital, Nineveh--near Mosul, Kouyunjik, and Neby-Junus--lay six -hundred miles from the Gulf of Persia. The people spoke, as their -descendants still speak, a dialect of Syriac, akin both grammatically -and structurally to Hebrew. Assyria was constantly at war with -Babylonia; but for the most part the kings of Assyria held Babylon in -subjection, and Tiglath-Pileser was a king of the Chaldaeans under the -name Pul, as well as a king of Nineveh. - -Menahem was warrior enough to know how hopeless it was to struggle -against these trained forces. He was not even secure on his own -throne. He thought it best to offer himself without resistance as a -feudatory, if the Assyrian King would confirm his sovereignty. -Tiglath-Pileser did not think Menahem worth more trouble, and was -graciously pleased to accept by way of bribe a tribute of a thousand -talents of silver, or about L125,000. This, however, as we learn from -the _Eponym Canon_, was not all. Menahem had to pay a further tribute -year by year. Later on, in 738, Shalmaneser mentions Minik-himmi -(Menahem), as well as Rasunnu (Rezin), among his tributaries. - -The Assyrian withdrew, and Menahem had to exact this vast sum of money -from his miserable subjects. To tax the poor was hopeless. He found that -there were some sixty thousand persons who might be reckoned among the -wealthier farmers and proprietors,[370] and from them he at once exacted -fifty shekels of silver (more than L3) apiece. Probably they thought -that to pay the sum demanded was not too heavy a price for the -retirement of these frightful Assyrians, whose forces Tiglath-Pileser -did not withdraw until he had the money in hand. The event took place in -738, and Tiglath-Pileser continued to reign till 727. How bitterly the -burden of foreign tribute was felt appears from Hos. viii. 9, 10, which -should perhaps be rendered, "They are gone up to Assyria like a wild ass -alone by himself. Ephraim hath hired lovers. And they begin to be -minished by reason of the burden of the king of princes." "The king of -princes" was the haughty title usurped by Tiglath-Pileser, who said, -"Are not my princes all of them kings?" (Isa. x. 8). - -All this was a fulfilment of what Hosea had foreseen:-- - -"Ephraim is oppressed, he is crushed in judgment, because he was content -to walk after vanity. Therefore am I unto Ephraim as a moth, and to the -house of Judah as rottenness. When Ephraim saw his sickness, and the -house of Judah his wound, then went Ephraim to Assyria, and sent unto an -avenging king:[371] yet could he not heal you, nor cure you of your -wound. For I will be unto Ephraim as a lion, and as a young lion to the -House of Judah: I, even I, will tear and go away; I will take away, and -none shall rescue him." The Assyrian was irresistible, because he was -the destined instrument of the wrath of God. The "mixing with the -heathens" was a sin, and Israel in cooing to Assyria was like a foolish -dove; but the day sometimes comes to doomed nations when no course can -save them from the fate which they have provoked.[372] - -Not long afterwards Menahem died, and he had sufficiently established -his rule to be succeeded as a matter of course by his son Pekahiah. But - - "Revenge and wrong bring forth their kind; - The foul cubs like their parents are." - -Samaria had fearful object-lessons in the apparently immediate success -of murder and rebellion. The prize looked near and splendid: the -vengeance might be belated or might not come. Of Pekahiah we are told -absolutely nothing but that he reigned two years, with this -stereotyped addition, that "he did that which was evil in the sight of -Jehovah" by continuing the calf-worship.[373] After this brief and -uneventful reign, his captain Pekah got together fifty fierce -Gileadites, and with the aid of two otherwise unknown friends, Argob -and Arieh, murdered Pekahiah in his own harem.[374] Argob was probably -so named from the district in Bashan, and Arieh was a fit name for a -lion-faced Gadite (1 Chron. xii. 8). - -The sacred historian troubles himself but little about these kings. -His annals of them are brief to extreme meagreness. Like the prophet, -he viewed them as God-abandoned phantoms of guilty royalty. - - "They that cry unto me, My God, we, Israel, know thee. - Israel hath cast off that which is good: - The enemy shall pursue him. - They have set up kings, but not by Me; - They have removed them, and I knew it not: - Of their silver and their gold have they made them idols, - That they may be cut off. - He hath cast on thy calf, O Samaria." - -Probably Pekahiah was, as so often happens, the weak son of a -vigorous father. The times could not tolerate incapable sovereigns; -and the fact that Pekah not only maintained himself on the throne for -twenty years,[375] but was able to take active steps of aggression -against Jerusalem, seems to show that he was a man of some -administrative capacity. If he had not achieved political and military -importance, it would hardly have been worth while for a fierce and -powerful king like Rezin, the last king of Syria, to form so close an -alliance with him. Probably Rezin saw that his throne and his very -existence were in danger, and Pekah wished with Rezin's aid to resist -to the uttermost the encroachments of Assyria, and escape the -burdensome tribute which Menahem had paid. Indeed, it may well be that -Pekahiah's passive continuance of this tribute may have been -distasteful to the people of the land, and that they condoned or even -tacitly aided Pekah's rebellion in order to get rid of it, and to find -protection in an abler monarch. It was the last, perhaps the only, -chance for the kings of Syria and of Israel. As we hear no more of -Hamath as a member of the alliance, we must suppose that it had now -been reduced to impotence and vassalage by the all-powerful Assyrian. -If, however, there was to be any overbalance to the colossal menace -of Nineveh, it could only be by a large confederacy; and it may have -been the refusal of Jotham to join that confederacy, on the death of -his father Uzziah, which caused the joint invasion of Rezin and Pekah -to force him to accept their alliance or to suppress him altogether. -In that case they might have formed a close alliance with Egypt, and -the forces of the united South might, they fancied, prove to be a -match for the forces of the North.[376] - -Whatever designs they may have formed against Jotham, or to whatever -extent they may have annoyed him, it was not till the reign of his son -Ahaz that they became formidable and ruinous. Of this we shall say -more in recounting the reign of Ahaz. All that we need now remark is -that their bold aggression on Judah became the cause of utter -destruction to them both. They advanced against Ahaz, and overran his -helpless country. It was their object to depose the descendant of -David, and to crown in his place a certain unnamed "son of _Tabeal_," -whom Ewald supposed to have been a Syrian, but whose name may possibly -furnish a specimen of the later Jewish device of Gematria.[377] - -It is not impossible that behind these events we may find the efforts -and yearnings of a party which cared more for Israel's unity than for -David's throne. Such a party may easily have sprung up during the -splendid, prosperous reign of Jeroboam II. It has been conjectured by -some that the election of Uzziah by the people--delayed, according to -one reckoning, for twelve years--was in reality the triumph of the party -which felt an unquenchable allegiance to David's house. In Deut. -xxxiii. Reuben is put before Judah; Jeshurun (_i.e._, Israel) is -magnified far more than Judah; and some Northern shrine in Zebulon, as -well as the Temple, is celebrated as a sanctuary.[378] That there were -men in Jerusalem who preferred Rezin and Pekahiah to their own king is -clearly stated in Isaiah. He compares them to those who prefer a turbid -torrent to a soft, sweet stream. "Because," he says, "this people -despise the waters of Shiloah that flow softly, and take delight in -Rezin and Remaliah's son; now, therefore, the Lord bringeth upon them -the waters of the river, strong and many, even the King of Assyria, and -all his glory."[379] Isaiah seems to have had a contempt for the whole -attack. He told Ahaz not to fear for the stumps of those two smoking -firebrands Rezin, King of Syria, and the Israelitish usurper, whom he -only condescends to call "Remaliah's son." He promises the trembling -Ahaz that, since he had faithlessly _refused_ a sign, God would give him -a sign. The sign was that the young woman who accompanied -Isaiah--perhaps his youthful wife--should bear a son, whose name should -be called Immanuel; and that before the child Immanuel--whose -designation, "God with us," was an omen of the loftiest hope--should be -of an age to distinguish evil from good, the Northern land, which Ahaz -abhorred, should be forsaken of both her kings. - -The prophecy came true in every particular. Rezin and Pekah swept all -before them, and besieged Jerusalem; but they wasted their time in -vain before the fortifications which Jotham had strengthened and -repaired. Obliged to raise the siege, Rezin carried his army -southward, and indemnified himself by seizing Elath, by driving out -the Judaean garrison, and replacing them with Syrians.[380] It was the -last gleam of Syrian success, before the final overthrow of Damascus -which prophecy had often and emphatically foretold. - -Pekah also withdrew his forces--no doubt compelled to do so by the -step which Ahaz took in his desperation. For now the King of Judah -invoked the protection and invited the active interference of -Tiglath-Pileser against his enemies--"to save him out of the hand of -the King of Syria, and out of the hand of the King of Israel, who were -risen up against him." - -Rezin and Damascus first felt the might of the Assyrian's conquering -arm. The account of his decisive conquest is preserved in the _Eponym -Canon_, and the passages which refer to the defeat of the Syrians will -be found in the First Appendix at the end of the volume. It appears -from the monuments that Rezin (Rasannu) lost not only his kingdom, but -his life. - -It is the death-knell of Aramaean greatness, as Amos had foretold. - - "Thus saith Jehovah: - For three transgressions of Damascus, and for four, - I will not turn away the punishment thereof; - Because they have threshed Gilead with threshing instruments of iron: - But I will send a fire into the house of Hazael, - Which shall devour the palaces of Benhadad. - And I will break the bar of Damascus,[381] - And cut off him that sitteth [on the throne] in the Valley of - Aven,[382] - And him that holdeth the sceptre from Beth-Eden:[383] - And the people of Syria shall go into captivity unto Kir,[384] - Saith Jehovah." - -Rezin was slain--how we know not; very probably by one of the horrible -methods of torture--by being flayed alive, or decapitated, or having -his lips and nose cut off--which were practised by these demon-kings -of Nineveh. - -Nor did Pekah escape. Tiglath-Pileser advanced against the northern part -of his dominions, and afflicted the land of Zebulon and Naphtali. Ijon; -Abel-beth-Maachah, the city of Elisha; Zanoah, the ancient sanctuary of -Kedesh-Naphtali, the home of the hero Barak; Hazor, the former capital -of the Canaanitish king Jabin; Gilead; Galilee,--all submitted to him, -apparently without striking a serious blow. He dealt with the miserable -inhabitants in the way familiar to kings of Assyria. He deported them -_en masse_ into a strange country of which they did not understand the -language, and in which they were reduced to hopeless subjection, while -he supplied their places by aliens from various parts of his own -dominions. There could be no securer method of reducing to paralysis all -their national aspirations. Strangers in a strange land, they forgot -their nationality, forgot their religion, forgot their language, forgot -their traditions. Their sole resource was to plunge into material -pursuits, and to melt away into indistinguishable obliteration among -the neighbouring heathen. It was the beginning of the Northern -Captivity--of the loss of the Ten Tribes. - -As Tiglath-Pileser thus permanently subdued and depopulated the land -of the Northern Tribes, it is a Jewish tradition that at this time he -carried away the golden "calf" from Dan among his spoils.[385] -Scripture does not record the fact, though in Hosea (viii. 5) there -may be an allusion to the fate of that at Bethel, whether the right -version be "He hath cast off thy calf, O Samaria," or "Thy calf, O -Samaria, hath cast thee off."[386] "The workman made it," he -continues; "therefore it is not God: for the calf of Samaria shall be -broken in pieces." And again (x. 5): "The people of Samaria shall fear -because of the heifer of the House of Vanity: for the people thereof -shall mourn over it, and the _chemarim_ [_i.e._, the black-robed false -priests thereof] shall tremble for it, for the glory thereof, because -it is departed. It [the idol] shall also be carried to Assyria for a -present to King Combat." - -For a time Pekah escaped; but unsuccess is fatal to a murderous usurper, -weakened by the loss and plunder of dominions which he is unable to -defend. Instead of wasting time in the siege of a strong city like -Samaria, Tiglath-Pileser in all probability stirred up Hoshea, the son -of Elah, to rise in conspiracy against his master and slay him. For -Pekah and Israel seem to have made light of the Northern raid. They said -in their pride and stoutness of heart, "The bricks are fallen down, but -we will build with new stones: the sycomores are cut down, but we will -change them into cedars." Such pretence of security was ill-timed and -senseless, and Isaiah denounced it. "Therefore," he said, "Jehovah hath -set up against Israel the adversaries of Rezin [_i.e._, the Assyrians], -and hath stirred up his enemies; the Syrians on the east, and the -Philistines on the west; and they have devoured Israel with open mouth. -For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out -still. Yet the people have not turned unto Him that smote them, neither -have they sought the Lord of hosts. Therefore Jehovah hath cut off from -Israel palm-branch and rush in one day. The elder and the honourable -man, he is the head; and the prophet that speaketh lies, he is the tail. -For they that lead this people cause them to err, and they that are led -of them are swallowed up."[387] - -The following verses furnish one of the numerous pictures of the anarchy -and abounding misery of these evil days. "For wickedness burneth as the -fire: it devoureth the briers and thorns; yea, it kindleth in the -thickets of the forest, and they roll upwards in thick clouds of smoke. -Through the wrath of the Lord of hosts is the land burnt up; the people -also are the fuel of fire: _no man spareth his brother_. And one shall -snatch on the right, and be hungry; and he shall eat on the left hand, -and they shall not be satisfied: they shall _eat every man the flesh of -his own arm_: Manasseh, Ephraim; and Ephraim, Manasseh: and they -together shall be against Judah. For all this His anger is not turned -away, but His hand is stretched out still." - -We are told in the Book of Kings that Pekah reigned for twenty years; -but some of these later reigns must be shortened to suit the -exigencies of known chronological data. It seems probable that he -occupied the throne for a much shorter time.[388] - -Such was the weakened, harassed, vassal kingdom--the gaunt spectre of -itself--to the throne of which, after a period of anarchy and chaos, -Hoshea, by conspiracy and murder, succeeded as the miserable feudatory -of Assyria. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[354] Amos viii. 2. - -[355] Amos iv. 1-3. - -[356] It is probable that our present Book of Zechariah is composed of -the works of three prophets of different dates, each of whom may have -borne that name. See my _Minor Prophets_ ("Men of the Bible" Series). - -[357] Zech. xi. 8. In 2 Kings xv. 10 the LXX. read [Greek: kai -epataxen auton en keblaam]; and Ewald thinks that "before the people" -([Hebrew: kavol-tzam]) is really a proper name of the third king in -one month--"and _Kobolam_ slew him." There is insufficient ground for -this; though a similar name is found in Assyrian records. - -[358] Hos. viii. 3, vii. 7. - -[359] Zachariah, Shallum, Kobolam (?). - -[360] Zech. xi. 1-17 (Heb. 13). - -[361] That this was Thapsacus on the Euphrates (1 Kings iv. 24), and -that Menahem was in a position to march northward three hundred miles, -and offer so deadly and wanton an insult to the might of Assyria, is -out of the question. The name means "a ford," and might apply to any -town on a river. Thenius thinks the name is a clerical error for -_Tappuach_, between Ephraim and Manasseh (Josh. xvii. 7, 8). - -[362] Josephus says, [Greek: omotetos hyperbolen ou katalipon oude -agriotetos]. It is said that the same crime was committed in 1861 by a -Mexican bandit. Machiavelli says, "He who violently and without just -right usurps a crown must use cruelty, if cruelty becomes necessary, -once for all" (_De princ._, 8). - -[363] 2 Kings viii. 12; Hos. xiii. 16. - -[364] Amos i. 13. - -[365] Hos. x. 14. This allusion is, however, uncertain. Shalmaneser III. -is not elsewhere found abbreviated into Shalman. Some suppose him to be -a Moabitish king, Salamannu, who was a vassal of Tiglath-Pileser. The -LXX., Vulg., etc., identify him with the Zalmunna of Judg. viii. 18. -Psalm lxxxiii. 11 renders the word _ex domo ejus qui judicavit Baal_ -(_i.e._, Gideon). Beth-Arbel is either Arbela in Galilee, or Irbid, -north-east of Pella. - -[366] Nah. iii. 10. - -[367] Isa. xiii. 16. - -[368] The two predecessors of Tiglath-Pileser (_Tuklat-abal-isarra_) -were Assurdayan and Assurnirari. - -[369] Isa. v. 26-29. - -[370] Comp. Job xx. 15; Ruth ii. 1. - -[371] Hos. v. 11-13. Comp. x. 6: "It [Samaria] shall be carried to -Assyria for a present unto King Jareb." Sayce (_Bab. and Orient. -Records_, December 1887) thinks that Jareb may have been the original -name of Sargon, and so too Neubauer, _Zeitschr. fuer Assyr._, 1886. The -Vulg. renders King Jareb _ad regem ultorem_, and so too Symmachus. -Aquila and Theodotion have [Greek: dikazomenon]. It may be the name of -an unknown king of Assyria, or of Pul, or of Sargon--R.V., margin, "a -king that should contend." - -[372] Hos. vii. 8-12. - -[373] Josephus says, [Greek: te tou patros akolouthesas omoteti]. - -[374] 2 Kings xv. 25, A.V., "in the palace of the king's house" -(_armon_), rather "fortress." For the character of the Gileadites see -1 Chron. xii. 8, xxvi. 31. - -[375] The length of Pekah's reign is most doubtful. If the periods -assigned to the reigns in the Northern and Southern Kingdoms be added -together up to the Fall of Samaria in the sixth year of Hezekiah (2 -Kings xviii. 9, 10), it will be found that the Southern chronology is -twenty years longer than the Northern. G. Smith would alter the text, -and make Jeroboam II. reign fifty-one years and Pekah thirty years; -others invent an interregnum of eleven years between Jeroboam II. and -Zachariah, and an anarchy of nine years before Hoshea's accession; -others shorten Pekah's reign to _one_ year. - -[376] 2 Kings xv. 37. - -[377] Vide _infra_. - -[378] Deut. xxxiii. 19: "They [Zebulon] shall call the peoples unto -the mountain: there shall they offer the sacrifices of righteousness." - -[379] Isa. viii. 6, 7. - -[380] Perhaps we should read Edomites (2 Kings xvi. 6). - -[381] The bar of its city gate. - -[382] Bikath-Aven--"The cleft of Aven"--Coele Syria, or Hollow Syria, -still called by the Arabs El-Bukaa. Comp. Josh. xi. 17, xii. 7. Aven--or -"Vanity"--is perhaps Heliopolis or Baalbek. Comp. Ezek. xxx. 17. - -[383] Perhaps Beit el Jame, "House of Paradise"--about eight hours -from Damascus (Porter, _Five Years in Syria_, i. 313). - -[384] Kir, in Armenia--the land of their origin (Amos ix. 7). - -[385] But, after all, was there a golden calf at Dan? It is scarcely -ever alluded to, and the notion that there was one may have arisen (1) -from a corruption or mistaken rendering of the text in 1 Kings xii. -29, and (2) from the existence there of the idolatrous ephod. See -Klostermann, _ad loc._; Isa. ix. 8-17. - -[386] LXX., [Greek: Apotripsai ton moschon sou, Samareia]; Vulg., -_Projectus est vitulus tuus, Samaria_. Orelli renders it, "Abscheulich -ist dein Kalb, O Samaria." In Jer. xlvi. 15 we read (of Egypt), "Why is -thy strong one swept away?" where the true reading may be, "Hath Khaph -[_i.e._, Apis], thy chosen one, fled?" LXX., [Greek: Apis ho moschos -sou, ho eklektos]. So Amos had prophesied that the "god of Dan" and the -"way of Beersheba" should fall for evermore (Amos viii. 14). - -[387] Isa. ix. 11-16. With this passage comp. 2 Kings xxiii. 5; Zeph. -i. 4; Hos. vii. 9, 10. - -[388] Tiglath-Pileser says: "Pakaha, their king, I killed: Ausi -[Hoshea] I placed over them. The distant land of Bit-Khumri [the -"house of Omri"]--_the whole of its inhabitants_, with their goods--I -carried away to Asshur" (B.C. 734). In this year he mentions Ahaz -among his tributaries. - - - - - CHAPTER XXI - - _HOSHEA, AND THE FALL OF THE NORTHERN KINGDOM_ - - B.C. 734-725 - - 2 KINGS xvii. 1-41 - - "As for Samaria, her king is cut off as the foam upon the - water."--HOS. x. 7. - - -As a matter of convenience, we follow our English Bible in calling the -prophet by the name Ho_sea_, and the nineteenth, last, and best king of -Israel Ho_shea_. The names, however, are identical ([Hebrew: -hovoshetza]), and mean "Salvation"--the name borne by Joshua also in his -earlier days. In the irony of history the name of the last king of -Ephraim was thus identical with that of her earliest and greatest hero, -just as the last of Roman emperors bore the double name of the Founder -of Rome and the Founder of the Empire--Romulus Augustulus. By a yet -deeper irony of events the king in whose reign came the final -precipitation of ruin wore the name which signified deliverance from it. - -And more and more, as time went on, the prophet Hosea felt that he had -no word of present hope or comfort for the king his namesake. It was -the more brilliant lot of Isaiah, in the Southern Kingdom, to kindle -the ardour of a generous courage. Like Tyrtaeus, who roused the -Spartans to feel their own greatness--like Demosthenes, who hurled -the might of Athens against Philip of Macedon--like Chatham, "bidding -England be of good cheer, and hurl defiance at her foes"--like Pitt, -pouring forth, in the days of the Napoleonic terror, "the indomitable -language of courage and of hope,"--Isaiah was missioned to encourage -Judah to despise first the mighty Syrian, and then the mightier -Assyrian. Far different was the lot of Hosea, who could only be the -denouncer of an inevitable doom. His sad function was like that of -Phocion after Chaeroneia, of Hannibal after Zama, of Thiers after -Sedan: he had to utter the Cassandra-voices of prophecy, which his -besotted and demented contemporaries--among whom the priests were the -worst of all[389]--despised and flouted until the time for repentance -had gone by for ever. - -True it is that Hosea could not be content--what true heart could?--to -breathe nothing but the language of reprobation and despair. Israel -had been "yoked to his two transgressions,"[390] but Jehovah could not -give up His love for His chosen people:-- - - "How shall I give thee up, Ephraim? - How shall I surrender thee, Israel? - How shall I make thee as Admah? - How shall I treat thee as Zeboim? - Mine heart is turned within Me; - I am wholly filled with compassion! - I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger; - I will not again destroy Ephraim: - For I am God, and not man. - The Holy One in the midst of thee! - I will not come to exterminate! - They shall come after Jehovah as after a lion that roars! - For he shall roar, and his sons shall come hurrying from the - west, - They shall come hurrying as a bird out of Egypt, - And as a dove out of the land of Assyria; - And I will cause them to dwell in their houses, Saith - Jehovah."[391] - -Alas! the gleam of alleviation was imaginary rather than actual. The -prophet's wish was father to his thought. He had prophesied that -Israel should be scattered in all lands (ix. 3, 12, 17, xiii. 3-16). -This was true; and it did not prove true, except in some higher ideal -sense, that "Israel shall again dwell in his own land" (xiv. 4-7) in -prosperity and joy. - -The date of Hoshea's accession is uncertain, and we cannot tell in -what sense we are to understand his reign as having lasted "nine -years."[392] We have no grounds for accepting the statement of -Josephus (_Antt._, IX. xiii. 1), that Hoshea had been a friend of -Pekah and plotted against him. Tiglath-Pileser expressly says that he -himself slew Pekah and appointed Hoshea.[393] His must have been, at -the best, a pitiful and humiliating reign. He owed his purely vassal -sovereignty to Assyrian patronage. He probably did as well for Israel -as was in his power. Singular to relate, he is the only one of all the -kings of Israel of whom the historian has a word of commendation; for -while we are told that "he did that which was evil in the sight of -the Lord," it is added that it was "not as the kings of Israel that -were before him." But we do not know wherein either his evil-doing or -his superiority consisted. The Rabbis guess that he did not replace -the golden calf at Dan which Tiglath-Pileser had taken away (Hos. x. -6); or that he did not prevent his subjects from going to Hezekiah's -passover.[394] "It seems like a harsh jest," says Ewald, "that this -Hoshea, who was better than all his predecessors, was to be the last -king." But so it has often been in history. The vengeance of the -French Revolution smote the innocent and harmless Louis XVI. and Marie -Antoinette--not Louis XIV., or Louis XV. and Madame du Pompadour. - -His patron Tiglath-Pileser ended his magnificent reign of conquest in -727, soon after he had seated Hoshea on the throne. The removal of his -strong grasp on the helm caused immediate revolt. Phoenicia especially -asserted her independence against Shalmaneser IV. He seems to have -spent five years in an unavailing attempt to capture Island-Tyre. -Meanwhile, the internal troubles which had harassed and weakened Egypt -ceased, and a strong Ethiopian king named Sabaco established his rule -over the whole country.[395] It was perhaps the hope that Phoenicia -might hold out against the Assyrian, and that the Egyptian might -protect Samaria, which kindled in the mind of Hoshea the delusive plan -of freeing himself and his impoverished land from the grinding tribute -imposed by Nineveh. While Shalmaneser[396] was trying to quell Tyre, -Hoshea, having received promises of assistance from Sabaco, withheld -the "presents"--the _minchah_, as the tribute is euphemistically -called--which he had hitherto paid. Seeing the danger of a powerful -coalition, Shalmaneser swept down on Samaria in 724. Possibly he -defeated the army of Israel in the plain of Jezreel (Hos. i. 5), and -got hold of the person of Hoshea. Josephus says that he "besieged -him"; but the sacred historian only tells us that "he shut him up, and -bound him in prison." Whether Hoshea was taken in battle, or betrayed -by the Assyrian party in Samaria, or whether he went in person to see -if he could pacify the ruthless conqueror, he henceforth disappears -from history "like foam"--or like a chip or a bubble--"upon the -water." We do not know whether he was put to death, but we infer from -an allusion in Micah that he was subjected to the cruel indignities in -which the Assyrians delighted; for the prophet says, "They shall smite -the Judge of Israel with a rod upon the cheek."[397] Perhaps in the -title "Judge" (Shophet, _suffes_) we may see a sign that Hoshea's -royalty was little more than the shadow of a name. - -Having thus got rid of the king, Shalmaneser proceeded to invest the -capital. But Samaria was strongly fortified upon its hill, and the -Jewish race has again and again shown--as it showed so conspicuously -in the final crisis of its destiny, when Jerusalem defied the terrible -armies of Rome--that with walls to protect them they could pluck up a -terrible courage and endurance from despair. Strong as Assyria was, -the capital of Ephraim for three years resisted her beleaguering host -and her crashing battering-rams. About all the anguish which prevailed -within the city, and the wild vicissitudes of orgy and starvation, -history is silent. But prophecy tells us that the sorrows of a -travailing woman came upon the now kingless city. They drank to the -dregs the cup of fury.[398] The saddest Northern prophet, "the -Jeremiah of Israel," sings the dirge of Israel's saddest king.[399] - - "I am become to them as a lion; - As a leopard will I watch by the way; - I will meet them as a bear bereaved of her whelps, - And rend the caul of their heart, - And there will I devour them like a lioness: - The beast of the field shall tear them.... - Where now is thy king, that he may save thee in all thy cities - And thy judges, of whom thou saidst, 'Give me a king and - prince'? - I give thee a king in Mine anger, - And take him away in My wrath." - -For three years Samaria held out. During the siege Shalmaneser died, -and was succeeded by Sargon, who--though he vaguely talks of "the -kings his ancestors," and says that he had been preceded by three -hundred and thirty Assyrian dynasts--never names his father, and seems -to have been a usurping general.[400] - -Sabaco remained inactive, and basely deserted the miserable people -which had relied on his protection. In this conduct Egypt was true to -its historic character of untrustworthiness and inertness. Both in -Israel and in Judah there were two political parties. One relied on -the strength of Egypt; the other counselled submission to Assyria, -or--in the hour when it became necessary to defy Assyria--confidence -in God. Egypt was as frail a support as one of her own paper-reeds, -which bent under the weight, and broke and ran into the hand of every -one who leaned on it. - -Sargon did not raze the city, and we see from the _Eponym Canon_ that -its inhabitants were still strong enough some years later to take part -in a futile revolt. But we have one dreadful glimpse of the horrors -which he inflicted upon it. They were the inevitable punishment of -every conquered city which had dared to resist the Assyrian arm. - - "Samaria shall bear her guilt, - For she hath rebelled against her God. - They shall fall by the sword: - Their infants shall be dashed in pieces, - And their women in child shall be ripped up."[401] - -Sargon's own record of the matter on the tablets at Khorsabad is: "I -besieged, took, and occupied the city of Samaria, and carried into -captivity twenty-seven thousand two hundred and eighty of its -inhabitants. I changed the former government of this country, and -placed over it lieutenants of my own. And Sebeh, Sultan of Egypt, came -to Raphia to fight against me. They met me, and I routed them. Sebeh -fled."[402] The Assyrians were occupied in the unsuccessful siege of -Tyre between 720-715, during which years Sargon put down Yahubid of -Hamath, whose revolt had been aided by Damascus and Samaria. In 710 he -marched against Ashdod (Isa. xx. 1). In 709 he defeated -Merodach-Baladan at Dur-Yakin, and reconquered Chaldaea, deporting some -of the population into Samaria. In 704, in the fifteenth year of his -reign, he was assassinated, after a career of victory. He inscribes on -his palace at Khorsabad a prayer to his god Assur, that, after his -toils and conquests, "I may be preserved for the long years of a long -life, for the happiness of my body, for the satisfaction of my heart. -May I accumulate in this palace immense treasures, the booties of all -countries, the products of mountains and valleys." Assur and the gods -of Chaldaea were invoked in vain; the prayer was scattered to the -winds, and the murderer's dagger was the comment on Sargon's happy -anticipations of peace and splendour. - -Israel fell unpitied by her southern neighbour, for Judah was still -smarting under memories of the old contempt and injury of Joash -ben-Jehoahaz, and the more recent wrongs inflicted by Pekah and Rezin. -Isaiah exults over the fate of Samaria, while he points the moral of her -fall to the drunken priests and prophets of Jerusalem. "Woe," he says, -"to the crown of pride of the drunkards of Ephraim, and to the fading -flower of his glorious beauty, which is on the head of the fat valley of -them that are smitten down with wine! Behold, the Lord hath a mighty and -strong one [_i.e._, the Assyrian]; as a tempest of hail, a destroying -storm, as a tempest of mighty water overflowing, shall he cast down to -the earth with violence. The crown of pride, the drunkards of Ephraim, -shall be trodden underfoot: and the fading flower of his glorious -beauty, which is on the head of the fat valley, shall be as the first -ripe fig before the summer; which when he that looketh upon it seeth, -while it is yet in his hand he eateth it up."[403] Israel had begun in -hostility to Judah, and perished by it at last. - -Such, then, was the end of the once brilliant kingdom of Israel--the -kingdom which, even so late as the reign of Jeroboam II., seemed to -have a great future before it. No one could have foreseen beforehand -that, when, with the prophetic encouragement of Ahijah, Jeroboam I. -established his sovereignty over the greater, richer, and more -flourishing part of the land assigned to the sons of Jacob, the new -kingdom should fall into utter ruin and destruction after only two and -a half centuries of existence, and its tribes melt away amid the -surrounding nations, and sink into a mixed and semi-heathen race -without any further nationality or distinctive history. It seemed far -less probable that the mere fragment of the Southern Kingdom, after -retaining its separate existence for more than one hundred and sixty -years longer than its more powerful brother, should continue to endure -as a nation till the end of time. Such was the design of God's -providence, and we know no more. The Northern Kingdom had, up to this -time, produced the greatest and most numerous prophets--Ahijah, -Elijah, Elisha, Micaiah, Jonah, Amos, Hosea, Nahum, and many -more.[404] It had also produced the loveliest and most enduring poetry -in the Song of Songs, the Song of Deborah, and other contributions to -the Books of Jashar, and of the Wars of Jehovah. It had also brought -into vigour the earliest and best historic literature, the narratives -of the Elohist and the Jehovist. These immortal legacies of the -religious spirit of the Northern Kingdom were incomparably superior in -moral and enduring value to the Levitic jejuneness of the Priestly -Code, with its hierarchic interests and ineffectual rules, which, in -the exaggerated supremacy attached to rites, proved to be the final -blight of an unspiritual Judaism. Israel had also been superior in -prowess and in deeds of war, and in the days of Joash ben-Jehoahaz -ben-Jehu had barely conceded to Judah a right to separate existence. -More than all this, the apostasies of Judah, from the days of Solomon -downwards, were quite as heinous as Jezebel's Baal-worship, and far -more deadly than the irregular but not at first idolatrous cultus of -Bethel. The prophets are careful to teach Judah that if she was -spared it was not because of any good deservings.[405] Yet now the -cedar was scathed and smitten down, and its boughs were rent and -scattered; and the thistle had escaped the wild beast's tread! - -In the former volume we glanced at some of the causes of this, and the -blessings which resulted from it. The central and chiefest blessing -was, first, the preservation of a purer form of monotheism, and a -loftier ideal of religion--though only realised by a few in -Judah--than had ever prevailed in the Northern Tribes; secondly, and -above all, the development of that inspiring Messianic prophecy which -was to be fulfilled seven centuries later, when He who was David's Son -and David's Lord came to our lost race from the bosom of the Father, -and brought life and immortality to light. - -And it was the work purely of "God's unseen providence, by men nicknamed -'Chance,'" which, dealing with nations as the potter with his clay, -chooses some to honour and some to dishonour. For, as all the prophets -are anxious to remind the Judaean Kingdom, their success, the -procrastination of their downfall, their restoration from captivity, -were not due to any merits of their own. The Jews were and ever had been -a stiff-necked nation; and though some of their kings had been faithful -servants of Jehovah, yet many of them--like Rehoboam, and Ahaz, and -Manasseh--exceeded in wickedness and inexcusable apostasy the least -faithful of the worshippers at Gilgal and Bethel. They were plainly -reminded of their nothingness: "And thou shalt speak and say before the -Lord thy God, A Syrian ready to perish was my father, and he went down -into Egypt, and sojourned there with a few, and became there a -nation."[406] "Fear not, thou worm Jacob: I will help thee."[407] - -But this was the end of the Ten Tribes. Nor must we say that Hosea's -prediction of mercy was laughed to scorn by the irony of events, when -he had given it as God's promise that-- - - "I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger, - I will not again destroy Israel; - For I am God, and not man."[408] - -The words mean that mercy is God's chiefest and most essential -attribute; and, after all, a nation is composed of families and -individuals, and in political extinction there may have been many -families and individuals in Israel, like that of Tobias, and like that -of Anna, the prophetess of the tribe of Asher, who found, either in -their far exile, or among the scattered Jews who still peopled the old -territories, a peace which was impossible during the distracted -anarchy and deepening corruption of the whole period which had elapsed -since the founding of the house of Omri. In any case God knows and -loves His own. The words, - - "I will not execute the fierceness of Mine anger; - For I am God, and not man," - -might stand for an epitome of much that is most precious in Holy Writ. -God's orthodoxy is the truth; and the truth remaineth, though man's -orthodoxy exercises all its fury and all its baseness to overwhelm it. -What hope has any man, even a St. Paul--what hope had even the Lord -Himself--before the harsh, self-interested tribunals of human -judgment, or of that purely external religionism which has always -shown itself more brutal and more blundering than secular cruelty? -What chance has there been, humanly speaking, for God's best saints, -prophets, and reformers, when priests, popes, or inquisitors have been -their judges? If God resembled those generations of unresisted -ecclesiastics, whose chief resort has been the syllogism of violence, -and whose main arguments have been the torture-chamber and the stake, -what hope could there possibly be for the vast majority of mankind but -those endless torments by the terrors of which corrupt Churches have -forced their tyranny upon the crushed liberties and the paralysed -conscience of mankind? The Indian sage was right who said that "God -can only be truly described by the words No! No!"--that is, by -repudiating multitudes of the ignoble and cruel basenesses which -religious teachers have imagined or invented respecting Him. Because -God is God, and not man--God, not a tyrant or an inquisitor--God, with -the great compassionate heart of unfathomable tenderness,--therefore, -in all who truly love Him, perfect love casteth out fear, because fear -hath torment. Sin means ruin; yet God is love.[409] - - * * * * * - -The historian of the Kings here digresses, in a manner unusual to the -Old Testament, to give us a most interesting glimpse of the fate of -the conquered people, and the origin of the race which was known to -after-ages by the name "Samaritan." - -Sargon, when he had sacked the capital, carried out the policy of -deportation which had now been established by the Assyrian kings. He -achieved the double purpose of populating the capital and province of -Nineveh, while he reduced subject nations to inanition, by sweeping -away all the chief of the inhabitants from conquered states, and -settling them in his own more immediate dominions. There they would be -reduced to impotence, and mingle with the races among whom their lot -would henceforth be cast. He therefore "carried Israel away" into -Assyria, and placed them in Halah, north of Thapsacus, on the -Euphrates, and in Habor, the river of Gozan[410]--_i.e._, on the river -in Northern Assyria which still bears the name of Khabour, and flows -into the Euphrates--and in the cities of the Medes.[411] He replaced -the old population by Dinaites, Tarplites, Apharsathchites, -Susanchites, Elamites, Dehavites, and Babylonians, after carrying away -the great bulk of the better-class population.[412] - -After this the historian pauses to sum up and emphasise once more the -main lesson of his narrative. It is that "righteousness exalteth a -nation, and sin is the reproach of any people." God had called His son -Israel out of Egypt, delivered His chosen from Pharaoh, given them a -pleasant land; but "Israel had sinned against Jehovah their God, and -had feared other gods, and walked in the statutes of the heathen." -They had failed therefore in fulfilling the very purpose for which -they had been set apart. They had been intended "to uplift among the -nations the banner of righteousness" and the banner of the One True -God. Instead of this, they were seduced by the heathen ritual of - - "Gay religions full of pomp and gold." - -They decked out alien institutions,[413] and alike in frequented and -populous places--"from the tower of the watchmen to the fenced -city"--set up _matstseboth_ (A.V., "pillars") and _Asherim_ on every -high hill. The green trees became _obumbratrices scelerum_, the secret -bowers of their iniquities. They burnt incense on the _bamoth_, and -served idols, and wrought wickedness. Useless had been the voices of -all the prophets and the seers. They went after vain things, and -became vain. Beginning with the two "calves," they proceeded to lewd -and orgiastic idolatries. Ahab and Jezebel seduced them into Tyrian -Baal-worship. From the Assyrians they learnt and practised the -adoration of the host of heaven.[414] From Moab and Ammon they -borrowed the abominable rites of Moloch, and used divination and -enchantments by means of belomancy (Ezek. xxi. 21, 22) and necromancy, -and sold themselves to do wickedness. - -Nor was this all. These idolatries, with their guilty ritualism, were -not confined to Israel, but also - - "Infected Zion's daughters with like heat, - Whose wanton passions in the sacred porch - Ezekiel saw, when, by the vision led, - His eye surveyed the dark idolatries - Of alienated Judah." - -And thus, when Jehovah afflicted the seed of Israel and cast them out -of His sight, Judah also had to feel the stroke of retribution.[415] - -And it is idle to object that even if Israel had been faithful she must -have inevitably perished before the superior might of Damascus, or -Nineveh, or Babylon. How can we tell? It is not possible for us thus to -write unwritten history, and there is absolutely nothing to show that -the surmise is correct. In the days of David, of Uzziah, of Jeroboam -II., Judah and Israel had shown what they could achieve. Had they been -strong in faithfulness to Jehovah, and in the righteousness which that -faith required, they would have shown an invincible strength amid the -moral enervation of the surrounding people. They might have held their -own by welding into one strong kingdom the whole of Palestine, including -Philistia, Phoenicia, the Negeb, and the Trans-Jordanic region. They -might have consolidated the sway which they at various times attained -southwards, as far as the Red Sea port of Elath; northwards over Aram -and Damascus, as far as the Hamath on the Orontes; eastwards to -Thapsacus on the Euphrates; westward to the Isles of the Gentiles. -There is nothing improbable, still less impossible, in the view that, if -the Israelites had truly served Jehovah and obeyed His laws, they might -then have permanently established the monarchy which was ideally -regarded as their inheritance, and which for brief and fitful periods -they partially maintained. And such a monarchy, held together by warrior -statesmen, strong and righteous, and above all secure in the blessing of -God, would have been a thoroughly adequate counterpoise, not only to -dilatory and distracted Egypt, which had long ceased to be aggressive, -but even to brutal Assyria, which prevailed in no small measure because -of the isolation and mutual dissension of these southern principalities. - -But, as it was, "Assyria and Egypt--the two world-powers in the dawn -of history, the two chief sources of ancient civilisation, the twin -giant-empires which bounded the Israelite people on the right hand and -on the left--were cruel neighbours, between whom the ill-fated nation -was tossed to and fro in wanton sport like a shuttlecock. They were -cruel friends before whom it must cringe in turns, praying sometimes -for help, suing sometimes for very life--alternate scourges in the -hand of the Divine wrath. Now it is the fly of Egypt, and now it is -the bee of Assyria, whose ruthless swarms issue forth at the word of -Jehovah, settling in the holes of the rocks, and upon all thorns, and -upon all bushes, with deadly sting, fatal to man and beast, -devastating the land far and wide. Holding the poor Israelite in their -relentless embrace, they threatened ever and again to crush him by -their grip. Like the fabled rocks which frowned over the narrow -straits of the Bosporus, they would crash together and annihilate the -helpless craft which the storms of destiny had placed at their mercy. -Israel reeled under their successive blows. As was the beginning, so -was the end. As the captivity of Egypt had been the cradle of the -nation, so was the captivity of Assyria to be its tomb."[416] - -In any case the principle of the historian remains unshaken. Sin is -weakness; idolatry is folly and rebellion; uncleanness is decrepitude. -St. Paul was not thinking of this ancient Philosophy of History when -he wrote his Epistle to the Romans; yet the intense and masterly -sketch which he gives of that moral corruption which brought about the -long, slow, agonising dissolution of the beauty that was Greece, and -the grandeur that was Rome, is one of its strongest justifications. -His view only differs from the summary before us in the power of its -eloquence and the profoundness of its psychologic insight. He says the -same thing as the historian of the Kings, only in words of greater -power and wider reach, when he writes: "For the wrath of God is -revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of -men, who hold down the truth in unrighteousness. Knowing God, they -glorified Him not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in -their reasonings" ([Greek: emataiothesan], the very word used in the -LXX. in 2 Kings xvii. 15), "and their senseless heart was darkened. -Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools" (words which -might describe the expediency-policy of Jeroboam I., and its fatal -consequences), "and changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the -likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four-footed -beasts, and creeping things. For this cause God gave them up to -passions of dishonour, and unto a reprobate mind, to do those things -which are not fitting, being filled with all unrighteousness, -wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, strife, -deceit, malignity,"--and so on, through a long catalogue of iniquities -which are identical with those which we find so burningly denounced on -the pages of the prophets of Israel and Judah. - -Even a Machiavelli, cool and cynical and audacious as was his -scepticism, could see and admit that faithfulness to religion is the -secret of the happiness and prosperity of states.[417] An irreligious -society tends inevitably and always to be a dissolute society; and a -"dissolute society is the most tragic spectacle which history has ever -to present--a nest of disease, of jealousy, of dissensions, of ruin, -and despair, whose last hope is to be washed off the world and -disappear. Such societies must die sooner or later of their own -gangrene, of their own corruption, because the infection of evil, -spreading into unbounded selfishness, ever intensifying and -reproducing passions which defeat their own aim, can never end in -anything but moral dissolution." We need not look further than the -collapse of France after the battle of Sedan, and the cause to which -that collapse was attributed, not only by Christians, but by her own -most worldly and sceptical writers, to see that the same causes ever -issue and will issue in the same ruinous effects. - - * * * * * - -In order to complete the history of the Northern Kingdom, the -historian here anticipates the order of time by telling us what -happened to the mongrel population whom Sargon transplanted into -central Ephraim in place of the old inhabitants. - -The king, we are told, brought them from Babylon--which was at this -time under the rule of Assyria; from Cuthah--by which seems to be -meant some part of Mesopotamia near Babylon;[418] from Avva, or -Ivah--probably the same as Ahavah or Hit, on the Euphrates, north-west -of Babylon; from Sepharvaim, or Sippara, also on the Euphrates;[419] -and from Hamath, on the Orontes, which had not long remained under -Jeroboam II.[420] It must not be supposed that the whole population of -Ephraim was deported; that was a physical impossibility. Although we -are told in Assyrian annals that Sargon carried away with him so vast -a number of captives, it is, of course, clear that the lowest and -poorest part of the population was left.[421] We can imagine the wild -confusion which arose when they found themselves compelled to share -the dismantled palaces and abandoned estates of the wealthy with the -horde of new colonists, whose language, in all probability, they but -imperfectly understood. There must have been many a tumult, many a -scene of horror, such as took place in the long antagonism of Normans -and Saxons in England, before the immigrants and the relics of the -former populace settled down to amalgamation and mutual tolerance. - -Sargon is said to have carried away with him the golden calf or calves -of Bethel, as Tiglath-Pileser is said by the Rabbis to have carried away -that of Dan.[422] He also took away with him all the educated classes, -and all the teachers of religion.[423] No one was left to instruct the -ignorant inhabitants; and, as Hosea had prophesied, there was neither a -sacrifice, nor a pillar, nor an ephod, and not even teraphim to which -they could resort.[424] Naturally enough, the disunited dregs of an old -and of a new population had no clear knowledge of religion. They "feared -not Jehovah." The sparseness of inhabitants, with its consequent neglect -of agriculture, caused the increase of wild beasts among them. There had -always been lions and bears in "the swellings of Jordan,"[425] and in -all the lonelier parts of the land; and to this day there are leopards -in the woods of Carmel, and hyaenas and jackals in many regions. -Conscious of their miserable and godless condition, and afflicted by the -lions, which they regarded as a sign of Jehovah's anger, the Ephraimites -sent a message to the King of Assyria. They only claimed Jehovah as -their local god, and complained that the new colonists had provoked the -wrath of "the God of the land" by not knowing His "manner"--that is, -the way in which He should be worshipped. The consequence was that they -were in danger of being exterminated by lions. The kings of Assyria were -devoted worshippers of Assur and Merodach, but they held the common -belief of ancient polytheists that each country had its own potent -divinities. Sargon, therefore, gave orders that one of the priests of -his captivity should be sent back to Samaria, "to teach them the manner -of the god of the land." The priest selected for the purpose returned, -took up his residence at the old shrine of Bethel, and "taught them how -they should fear Jehovah." His success was, however, extremely limited, -except among the former followers of Jeroboam's dishonoured cult. The -old religious shrines still continued, and the immigrants used them for -the glorification of their former deities. Samaria, therefore, witnessed -the establishment of a singularly hybrid form of religionism. The -Babylonians worshipped Succoth-Benoth,[426] perhaps Zirbanit, wife of -Merodach or Bel; the Cuthites worshipped Nergal, the Assyrian war-god, -the lion-god;[427] the Hittites, from Hamath, worshipped Ashima or -Esmun, the god of air and thunder, under the form of a goat;[428] the -Avites preferred Nibhaz and Tartak, perhaps Saturn--unless these names -be Jewish jeers, implying that one of these deities had the head of a -dog, and the other of an ass.[429] More dreadful, if less ridiculous, -was the worship of the Sepharvites, who adored Adrammelech and -Anammelech, the sun-god under male and female forms, to whom, as to -Moloch, they burnt their children in the fire. As for ministers, "they -made unto them priests from among themselves,[430] who offered -sacrifices for them in the shrines of the bamoth." Thus the whole -mongrel population "feared the Lord, and served their own gods," as they -continued to do in the days of the annalist whose record the historian -quotes. He ends his interesting sketch with the words, that, in spite of -the Divine teaching, "these nations"--so he calls them, and so -completely does he refuse to them the dignity of being Israel's -children--feared the Lord, and served their graven images, their -children likewise, and their children's children,--"as did their -fathers, so do they unto this day."[431] - -The "unto this day" refers, no doubt, to the document from which the -historian of the Kings was quoting--perhaps about B.C. 560, in the -third generation after the fall of Samaria. A very brief glance will -suffice to indicate the future history of the Samaritans. We hear but -little of them between the present reference and the days of Ezra and -Nehemiah. By that time they had purged themselves of these grosser -idolatries, and held themselves fit in all respects to co-operate -with the returned exiles in the work of building the Temple. Such was -not the opinion of the Jews. Ezra regarded them as "the adversaries of -Judah and Israel."[432] The exiles rejected their overtures. In B.C. -409 Manasseh, a grandson of the high priest expelled by Nehemiah for -an unlawful marriage with a daughter of Sanballat, of the Samaritan -city of Beth-horon, built the schismatic temple on Mount Gerizim.[433] -The relations of the Samaritans to the Jews became thenceforth deadly. -In B.C. 175 they seconded the profane attempt of Antiochus Epiphanes -to paganise the Jews, and in B.C. 130 John Hyrcanus, the Maccabee, -destroyed their temple. They were accused of waylaying Jews on their -way to the Feasts, and of polluting the Temple with dead bones.[434] -They claimed Jewish descent (John iv. 12), but our Lord called them -"aliens" ([Greek: allogenes], Luke xvii. 18), and Josephus describes -them as "residents from other nations" ([Greek: metoikoi, -alloethneis]). They are now a rapidly dwindling community of fewer -than a hundred souls--"the oldest and smallest sect in the -world"--equally despised by Jews and Mohammedans. The Jews, as in the -days of Christ, have no dealings with them. When Dr. Frankl, on his -philanthropic visit to the Jews of the East, went to see their -celebrated Pentateuch, and mentioned the fact to a Jewish -lady--"What!" she exclaimed: "have you been among the worshippers of -the pigeon? Take a purifying bath!" Regarding Gerizim as the place -which God had chosen (John iv. 20), they alone can keep up the old -tradition of the _sacrificial_ passover. For long centuries, since the -Fall of Jerusalem, it is only on Gerizim that the Paschal lambs and -kids have been actually slain and eaten, as they are to this day, and -will be, till, not long hence, the whole tribe disappears. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[389] Hos. iv. 4; v. 1, "Hear ye this, O priests ... ye have been a -snare on Mizpah," etc.; vi. 9, "The company of the priests murder by -the way to Shechem." - -[390] Hos. x. 10 (so R.V., and in the main the versions after the Hebrew -margin). LXX., [Greek: en to paideuesthai autous en tais dysin adikiais -auton]; Vulg., "_cum corripientur propter duas iniquitates suas_"; A.V., -"When they shall bind themselves in their two furrows." I believe that -the "_two_ iniquities" may mean _two_ cherubs at Bethel. See x. 15: "So -shall Bethel do unto you because of the evil of your evil." - -[391] Hos. xi. 8-11. - -[392] 2 Kings xvii. 1 is inconsistent with xv. 30, 33, and it is -wholly useless for our purpose to enter into complicated chronological -hypotheses, every one of which may be erroneous. - -[393] Schrader, _K. A. T._, p. 255. - -[394] _Seder Olam_, xxii. 2; 2 Chron. xxx. 6-11. - -[395] See Herod., ii. 137; called So (Heb., So or Seve) in 2 Kings -xvii. 4. Perhaps Shebek, the founder of the twenty-fifth dynasty. -LXX., [Greek: Segor]; Vulg., _Sua_; Manetho, _Sabachon_. In the -_Eponym Canon_ he is called an Egyptian general, _Sibakhi_, who helped -Gaza against Assyria, and was defeated. The _ka_ appended at the end -of his name (Egyptian Shaba-ka) is thought by some to be the Cushite -article. The race of the priest Hirhor died out with Piankhi, and the -Ethiopians elected a noble named Kashta. Shabak was his son. He -conquered Sais, and burnt his rival Bek-en-raut alive (B.C. 724). His -dynasty ruled for fifty years; he was succeeded by Sevechus -(Shabatok), and he by Tehrak (Tirhakah). - -[396] His name means "Salman, pardon." We have no monuments or -inscriptions of this king; only an imperial weight. - -[397] Mic. v. 1. - -[398] Hos. xiii. 13. - -[399] Hos. xiii. 7-11. The prophecy is rhythmic, though not written in -actual poetry. - -[400] Till the discovery of the Assyrian records, Sargon (Sharru-kenu, -'the faithful king') was but a name. The Jews knew but little of him. He -is but once mentioned in Scripture (Isa. xx. 1), and was probably -confused by some Jews with other kings. Yet he reigned sixteen years -(722-705), and his records give the annals of fifteen campaigns. In 720 -he crushed a confederacy headed by Yahubid of Hamath, and reduced that -city to a "heap of ruins." He then advanced against Hanno, King of Gaza, -who was in alliance with Sabaco, and defeated the combined forces of the -Philistines and Egyptians at Raphia, half-way between Gaza and the -Wady-el-Arish, "the torrent [_nachal_] of Egypt." Sargon was at the time -too much occupied with other enemies to pursue his advantage over Egypt; -for Armenia, Media, and other countries needed his attention. This -encouraged Ashdod to rebel, and its king, Azuri, refused his tribute -(see Isa. xx. 1). Sargon deposed him, and put his brother Ahimit in his -place. Relying on Egyptian promises, Philistia joined Judah, Edom, and -Moab in defying Assyria. They deposed Ahimit as an Assyrian nominee, and -put Yaman in his place. Egypt, as usual, failed to help, and in 711 the -Assyrian Turtan, or Commander-in-chief, took Ashdod after three years' -resistance, and carried its people into captivity. The punishment of -Egypt was reserved for the subsequent reigns of Esarhaddon (681-668) and -Assurbanipal. See Driver's _Isaiah xlv._ (Isa. xx.). Isa. xiv. 29-32 is -an ode of triumph for the Fall of Philistia. - -[401] Hos. xiii. 16. - -[402] See De Hincks in _Journ. of Sacr. Lit._, October 1858; Layard, -_Nin. and Bab._, i. 148. - -[403] Isa. xxviii. 1-4. - -[404] 2 Kings xvii. 13, "by all the prophets, and all the _seers_," -(_choseh_). Havernick thinks that the _nebi'im_ were such _officially_. - -[405] See Amos ii. 4, 5; Isa. xxviii. 15; Jer. xvi. 19, 20; Ezek. xx. -13-30, etc. - -[406] Deut. xxvi. 5. - -[407] Isa. xli. 14. - -[408] Hos. xi. 9. - -[409] See my _Minor Prophets_, 6-97. - -[410] Not as in A.V., "Habor, _by_ the river of Gozan." - -[411] 2 Kings xvii. 6. The LXX. has "rivers" and "mountains": [Greek: -en Alae kai en Abor potamois Gozan kai hore Medon]. The river is not -Ezekiel's Chebar. These deportations _en masse_ of a whole population, -with their women and children, their waggons and flocks, are depicted -on Sargon's series of tablets in his splendid palace at Khorsabad. - -[412] Ezra iv. 10. "The great and noble Asnapper" of the passage is -either some Assyrian general, or a confusion of the name Assurbanipal. - -[413] 2 Kings xvii. 9. Heb., "covered"; A.V. and R.V., "did secretly," -rather "perfidiously"; LXX., [Greek: emphiesanto logous adikous kata -kyrion]; Vulg., _Et offenderunt verbis non rectis dominum suum_. - -[414] Star-worship is not mentioned in the Book of the Covenant (Exod. -xx.-xxiii.) or the oldest sections of the Mosaic Law. It is first -forbidden in Deut. iv. 19, xvii. 3, when contact with Syrians and -Assyrians made it known (comp. Job xxxi. 26-28; Jer. viii. 2, xix. 13; -Zeph. i. 5). The language of 2 Kings vii.-xxiii. frequently reflects -the prohibitions of Deuteronomy (see Deut. xii. 2, 30, 31, iv. 19, v. -7, 8, xvi. 21, xviii. 10, xxxi. 16, etc.) - -[415] In 2 Kings xvii. 11, for "they did wicked things," the LXX. has -[Greek: koinonous] (_i.e._, _qedeshim_) [Greek: echaraxan kai -hetairidas] (_qedeshoth_); _i.e._, they had depraved _hieroduli_ of -both sexes. Comp. Hos. iv. 14; Gen. xxxviii. 21 (where the allusion is -to one of the votaries of Asherah). - -[416] Bishop Lightfoot, _Sermons_, p. 267. - -[417] "La quale Religione se ne Principi della Republica Christiana si -fusse mantenuta, secondo che dal dottore d'essa ne fu ordinato, -sarebbero gli State e le Republiche Christiane piu unite e piu felici -assai ch' elle non sono" (_Discorsi_, i. 12). - -[418] 2 Kings xvii. 24. Comp. xviii. 34. Hence the later Jews -comprehensively called the Samaritans Cuthites. Comp. 2 Kings xix. 13; -Isa. xxxvii. 13. - -[419] Heliopolis, Ptolemy, v. 18, Sec. 7; Isa. xxxvi. 19. Here, according -to the Chaldaean legends, Xisuthrus buried his tablets about the -Creation, etc. - -[420] From Ezra iv. 2 some infer that the main immigrants were -introduced by Esarhaddon, who did not succeed till B.C. 681. He claims -to have colonised Syria. - -[421] So we see from 2 Kings xix. 13, which applies to the reign of -Hezekiah. - -[422] See Appendix, "The Golden Calves." - -[423] He uses the agency of "the great and noble Asnapper" (Ezra iv. -10) for the deportation (see Botta, 145; Layard, _Nin. and Bab._, i. -148; Dr. Hincks, _Jour. of Sacr. Lit._, October 1858), unless Asnapper -be a confusion for Assurbanipal (Sardanapalus). - -[424] Hos. iii. 4. - -[425] See Jer. xlix. 19, l. 44; Prov. xxii. 13, etc. - -[426] Lit., "Daughter-huts" (Selden, _De Dis Syr._, ii. 7), but probably -a transliteration. Zarpanit--"She who gives seed"--was Aphrodite -Pandemos (Mylitta--Herod., i. 199). The Rabbis--who only guess--say she -represented "the Clucking Hen"--_i.e._, the Pleiades. There does not -seem to be any connection between Succoth and "Sakkuth," the various -reading in Amos v. 26, which seems to be the Assyrian Moloch. - -[427] Said to be worshipped under the form of a cock. - -[428] LXX., [Greek: Eblazer]. Jarchi says these deities were -worshipped under base animal forms--but it is more than doubtful. - -[429] The Rabbis, from Exod. xxiii. 13; Josh. xxiii. 7, thought they -were bound to give scornful nicknames to heathen deities. Hence such -changes as Kir-Heres for Kir-Cheres, Beelzebub for Beelzebul, Bethaven -for Bethel, Bosheth for Baal, etc. - -[430] Not as in A.V., "of the lowest of them," but "of all classes." -Comp. 1 Kings xii. 31. - -[431] In 2 Kings xvii. 31-38 we again find repeated references to -Deuteronomy (iv. 23, v. 32, x. 20, etc.). - -[432] Ezra iv. 1. The actual word "Samaritans" occurs only once in the -Old Testament, in 2 Kings xvii. 29. - -[433] See Neh. xiii. 4-9, 28, 29; Jos., _Antt._, XI. vii. 2. Josephus -makes Manasseh a brother of the high priest Jaddua (B.C. 333). - -[434] Jos., _Antt._, IX. xiv. 3, XII. v. 5, XIII. ix. 1, XX. vi., -XVIII. ii. 2. The bitterly hostile relations between Jews and -Samaritans in the time of Christ are illustrated by Luke ix. 52-54. - - - - - CHAPTER XXII - - _THE REIGN OF AHAZ_ - - B.C. 735-715 - - 2 KINGS xvi. 1-20 - - "Rimmon, whose delightful seat - Was fair Damascus, on the fertile banks - Of Abbana and Pharphar, lucid streams. - He also against the House of God was bold: - A leper once he lost, and gained a king-- - Ahaz, his sottish conqueror, whom he drew - God's altar to disparage and displace - For one of Syrian mode, whereon to burn - His odious offerings, and adore the gods - Whom he had vanquished." - _Paradise Lost_, i. 467-476. - - -According to our authorities, Ahaz ("Possessor")[435] began his reign -of sixteen years at the age of twenty. Of the exactitude of these -references we cannot be certain, because they also state (2 Kings -xviii. 2) that Hezekiah was twenty-five years old when he began to -reign, and this reduces us to the absurdity of supposing that Hezekiah -was born when his father was only eleven years old.[436] We might -infer from Isa. iii. 4 that Ahaz was not so old as twenty when he -succeeded Jotham; for there--in a terrible prophecy which can only -refer to the beginning of this reign--we read, "And I will give -children to be their princes, and babes shall rule over them"; or, as -it should be perhaps rendered, "And with childishness, or wilfulness, -shall they rule over them." - -Whatever may have been the king's age, surely never king succeeded to -a more distracted kingdom, or reigned over a more terrified people! If -he could have had any choice in the matter, he might well have -declined the fearful burden. Describing the state of things, the great -prophet Isaiah, who now began his career, exclaims,-- - -"For, behold, the Lord, the Lord of hosts, doth take away from Jerusalem -and from Judah stay and staff, the whole stay of bread, and the whole -stay of water; the mighty man, and the man of war, the judge, and the -prophet, and the diviner, and the elder; the captain of fifty, and the -honourable man, and the counsellor, and the cunning charmer, and the -skilful enchanter. And the people shall be oppressed every one by -another, and every one by his neighbour: the child shall behave himself -proudly against the elder, and the base against the honourable. Then a -man shall take hold of his brother in the house of his father, saying, -'Thou hast clothing, be _thou our judge, and let this ruin be under thy -hand_': in that day shall he lift his voice, saying, 'I will not be a -builder-up; for in my house is neither bread nor clothing: ye shall not -make me a ruler of the people.' For Jerusalem is ruined and Judah is -fallen. The show of their countenance is against them; and they declare -their sin as Sodom, and hide it not. As for My people, children are -their oppressors, and women rule over them."[437] - -This is a frightful picture of famine--the dearth of intellect, the -dearth of statesmen, of all genius, of all insight. It describes the -prevalence of oppression and of ghastly destitution, accompanied by -such utter despair that no one cared to exert himself for the arrest -of the ruin which seemed imminent over that which was already no -better than itself a ruin. - -The Book of Isaiah is arranged in a most confused and unchronological -manner, and it is probable that the first five chapters should be -placed after the sixth, which describes the prophet's call in the year -that King Uzziah died. They paint a picture of moral collapse. His -first chapter is called by Ewald "the great arraignment," and by its -references describes the awful period of alarm during the war of Syria -and Ephraim against Judah. It might seem as if the combined host was -even then in the country, or had only just retired from it; for we -read,-- - -"Your country is desolate, your cities are burned with fire: your land, -strangers devour it in your presence, and it is desolate, as overthrown -by strangers. And the daughter of Zion is left as a booth in a -wilderness, as a lodge in a garden of cucumbers, as a besieged city." - -But even in the midst of this afflictive dispensation there were no -signs of repentance. The children of Israel were rebels who despised -the Holy One of Israel,--"Ah, sinful nation, a people laden with -iniquity, a seed of evil-doers, children that deal corruptly!" (i. -7-9). They had all the externals of religion: they offered vain -sacrifices, and kept a multitude of idle feasts, and offered many -formal prayers; but all this was but a cumbrance to Him who desired -clean hands and a pure heart as conditions of forgiveness (10-20). -What hope could there be for a city of murderers, who loved bribes -and perverted judgment (21-24)? The land was full of pride, full of -idols, full of the luxury of the rich amid the starvation of the poor -(ii. 1-22).[438] Women partook of the general corruption. They walked -mincingly with stretched-forth necks and wanton eyes,[439] thinking of -nothing but their anklets, and crescents, and bracelets, and mufflers, -ear-drops, head-tires, perfumes, mirrors, armlets, and nose-jewels: -therefore they should have sackcloth for stomachers, ropes for -girdles, and burning instead of beauty, and only a remnant should -escape (iii. 16-iv. 1). Judah was like a vineyard,--rich in -advantages, blessed with fondest care; but when God looked for grapes, -it only brought forth wild grapes--a semblance, but only a poisoned -semblance, of the true vintage: therefore it should be left neglected -and rainless. Woe to the greedy land-grabbing, and drunkenness, and -revelry of the rich! Woe to their mockery of God and their devotion to -vanity! Woe to their insane pride and wanton injustice! Could they -escape vengeance? No! Jehovah had looked for judgment (_mishpat_), but -behold oppression (_mishpach_); for righteousness (_tse'dakah_), but -behold a cry (_tse'akah_) (v. 1-24).[440] They might escape--they -would escape--the Syrian and the Ephraimite; but behind these lay a -more terrible and a more portentous foe, even the Assyrian, the -scourge of God's wrath (25-30). - -"It was told the house of David, saying, Syria is confederate with -Ephraim." Is it strange that in such a condition of things the heart -of Ahaz and of his people "was moved as the trees of the wood are -moved with the wind"? - -Such was the terrible crisis at which Isaiah began his ministry. He -was the son of Amoz,[441] who has been (much too precariously) -identified with a brother of Amaziah. It is probable that he was a man -of distinguished, if not princely, birth, and he exercised a more -powerful influence over the politics of his country than any other -prophet--not even excepting Jeremiah. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[435] Probably a shortened form for Jehoahaz ("The Lord taketh hold"). -He is called Jahuhazi in Tiglath-Pileser's inscription (Schrader, -_Keilinschr._, p. 163). - -[436] For twenty-five it is not improbable that we should read fifteen. - -[437] Isa. iii. 1-12. - -[438] In Isa. ii. 2-4 we find, as so often in the prophetic books in -their present too-often-haphazard arrangement, a glowing promise of -universal peace placed before unsparing denunciations. The verses are -also found in Micah (iv. 1, 2), and it has been conjectured that in -both prophets they are a quotation from some older source--perhaps -from Jonah, son of Amittai. - -[439] Heb., "deceiving with their eyes." - -[440] Isa. v. 7. The paronomasia of the original is striking. Van Oort -renders it, "He looked for _reason_, but behold _treason_; and for -_right_, but behold _affright_." - -[441] His name means "Jehovah saves," and is perhaps alluded to in Isa. -viii. 18. Amos ("One who bears a burden"), needless to say, is a totally -different name from that of Amoz ("Vigorous"), the father of Isaiah. - - - - - CHAPTER XXIII - - _ISAIAH AND AHAZ_ - - 2 KINGS xvi - - "Expediency is man's wisdom; doing right is God's." - GEORGE MEREDITH. - - -Isaiah was one of those men whom God provides for the need of -kingdoms. He was not only a prophet, but a statesman, a reformer, a -poet, a man of invincible faith and unequalled insight. If Ahaz had -accepted his counsels and followed his moral guidance, the whole -history of Judah might have been different. - -But the position of things was indeed disastrous. Judah was attacked -from every side. On the south-east the Edomites renewed their -devastating raids, and swept off multitudes of captives, who were sold -as slaves in the Western slave-markets. On the south-west the -Philistines once more rose in revolt, and acquired permanent -repossession of many parts of the Shephelah, mastering Beth-Shemesh, -Ajalon, Gederoth, Shocho, Timnath, Gimzo, and all the adjacent -districts. But this was nothing compared with the humiliation and -destruction inflicted by Rezin and Pekah. They shut up Ahaz in -Jerusalem; and though they could not storm its almost impregnable -defences, which had recently been fortified by Uzziah and Jotham, they -were undisputed masters of the rest of the land, so that Judah was -"brought low and made naked."[442] Rezin, indeed, weary of a tedious -siege, swept southwards to Elath, on the gulf of Akabah, seized it, and -peopled it with an Edomite garrison, thereby destroying the commerce in -which Solomon and Jehoshaphat had taken pride, and which Uzziah had -recently re-established. Having thus left an effectual annoyance to -Judah in his rear, he gave up the design of dethroning Ahaz and -substituting in his place "_the son of Tabeal_," who would have been a -tool in the hands of the confederate kings. He seized, however, a -multitude of captives, and with them and with much booty he returned to -Damascus. "The son of Tabeal"--a name which occurs nowhere else--has -been found very puzzling.[443] I believe it to be simply an instance of -the Rabbinic process of transposition, called _Themourah_. Some identify -it with Itibi'alu of an inscription of Tiglath-Pileser. Others suppose -that he was a Syrian, and that Tabeal stands for Tabrimnon. But by the -application of Themourah (called the _Albam_) Tabeal simply gives us -"Remaliah," and is either a scornful variation of the name of Pekah's -father, or has arisen from the watchword of a secret conspiracy. Since -in the text of Jeremiah (li. 41, xxv. 26) (by _Atbash_, another form of -the secret transposition of letters of which the generic name was -_Gematria_) we read _Sheshach_ for Babel, the name Tabeal may have been -dealt with in a similar method.[444] Pekah, according to the Chronicler, -inflicted far deadlier injuries than Rezin. In one day he slew one -hundred and twenty thousand "sons of valour," because they had forsaken -Jehovah, God of their fathers. His general Zichri, a mighty Ephraimite, -slew Maaseiah, the king's son;[445] and Azrikam, the chancellor; and -Elkanah, "the second to the king." The army carried away two hundred -thousand captives and much spoil to Samaria. But on their arrival, a -prophet named Oded[446] reproved the Israelites for having massacred the -Judaeans "in a rage that reacheth to heaven." Aided by various princes, -he succeeded in inducing the people to refuse to harbour the captives, -and clothed, fed, and sent them back unharmed to Jericho, mounting the -feeble on horses and asses. The story bears on the face of it the signs -of enormous exaggeration. - -In the crisis of their miseries, but just before the siege, Ahaz had -gone outside the city walls "at the end of the conduit of the upper -pool, in the causeway of the fuller's field," probably to look after -the water-supply, which had always been a difficulty for Jerusalem, -and on which depended her capacity to withstand a siege. Here he was -met by the prophet Isaiah, who was leading by the hand the little son -to whom he had given the name of "Shear-jashub" ("A remnant shall -return"),[447] as a witness to the truth of the prophecy which he had -heard on the occasion of his call,-- - -"And if there should yet be a tenth in it, this shall be again consumed; -yet as the terebinth and the oak, though cut down, have their stock -remaining, even so a sacred seed shall be the stock thereof."[448] - -The object of the prophet was to cheer up the fainting heart of the -king, and to say to him first,-- - -"Take heed, and be quiet." - -This mandate probably refers to rumours--which Isaiah must have -heard--of the king's intention to follow the counsels of the party which -urged him to seek foreign assistance. One of these parties advised him -to throw himself into the arms of Egypt, and rely on her protection; the -other gave the more perilous counsel of invoking the aid of Assyria. -Isaiah's mandate to the king and to the nation was to take neither step, -but to trust in the Lord, and to repent of individual and national -misdoing. He summed up his message in the rule,-- - -"In returning and rest shall ye be saved; in quietness and confidence -shall be your strength." - -The advice was emphasised by a promise of the most decisive and -encouraging kind. When all looked so helpless, the prophet was bidden -to say,-- - -"Fear not, neither be faint-hearted, for these two stumps of smoking -torches, for the fierce anger of Rezin with Syria, and of Remaliah's -son. They have taken evil counsel against thee. But thus saith the -Lord God, 'It shall not stand, neither shall it come to pass. For the -head of Syria is only Rezin, and the head of Samaria is a mere -Remaliah's son.'"[449] - -And then, to confirm the lesson of confidence in God, the brief -assurance,-- - - "If ye will not confide, - Surely ye shall not abide." - -Convinced of the certainty of this immediate deliverance, Isaiah bade -the king to ask for a sign from Jehovah, either in the height above, -or in the depth beneath. - -But the timid and hypocritical king was not so to be influenced. He -had on his side "the scornful men, who ruled Judah"; the mocking -priests, who sneered and jeered at Isaiah's teaching as repetitive and -commonplace, and only fit for children; and the princes and nobles, -who formed the Court party, headed by Shebna the scribe. He probably -looked on Isaiah as a mere unpractical faddist, an excited -fanatic--all very well as a prophet, but not a man who ought to thrust -himself into the plans of politicians. Ahaz had his own plans, and he -had not the smallest intention of altering them in consequence of -anything which Isaiah might say. He was far too timid and unfaithful -to rely on anything so vague as Divine assurance. He was convinced -that his only chance lay in the horses of Egypt or the fierce infantry -of Assyria. So he said with sham piety, merely intended to put the -prophet off, "I will not ask, neither will I tempt Jehovah." - -That moment marks what may be called the birth-throe of Messianic -prophecy in its most specific character. For then the prophet, after -reproving the king for wearying Jehovah as well as His servants, adds, -in words of far wider and deeper significance than their immediate -bearing, that Jehovah Himself should give a sign; for the maiden -should conceive and bear a Son, and call His name Immanuel ("God with -us"). The child should grow up in a time of scarcity; for owing to the -devastation of the land, he would only be able to be nurtured on -curdled milk and honey. But before he had reached years of -discretion--before he had arrived at the power of moral choice--the -land whose two kings Ahaz abhorred should be a desert. Yet let not -Ahaz exult too much in the immediate deliverance! Days of unexampled -misery were at hand. Jehovah should hiss for the fly from the farthest -canals of Egypt, and for the bee of Assyria, and they should settle in -swarms in the valleys and pastures. Ahaz--he had not alluded to the -design, but Isaiah knew it well--was about to hire a razor from beyond -the Euphrates, but that razor should sweep away the hair and beard of -Judah. Agriculture should languish, and the people should only be able -to live in privation on whey and honey; and the vineyards should be -full of briers and thorns, and should be mere places for hunting.[450] - -This event, therefore, as Caspari says, stands at the turning-point of -Old Testament History. It marks the beginning of that second period of -the History of the Chosen People in which their hopes were granted as -a counterpoise to their anguish and their humiliation. "It stood, -therefore, at the point where a prospect offered itself to the eye of -the prophet which reached out over the whole development of the people -of God." - -To all such prophecies Ahaz was utterly deaf: they did not for a -moment induce him to swerve from his purpose. But to call still -further attention to his promise as the Syrian Ephraimitish host -pressed forward, Isaiah took a great piece of vellum, and inscribed on -it, in the ordinary characters,-- - - "SPEED-PLUNDER-HASTE-SPOIL." - -He put it up in some conspicuous place, before his own house or in the -Temple, and took the priest Urijah and Zechariah, the son of -Jeberechiah, into his confidence as faithful witnesses. He told them the -explanation of his sign, and they would satisfy the curiosity of the -people on the subject. It meant that in nine months' time his wife -should bear a son, and that he and his wife, the prophetess, would call -the boy's name "Speed-plunder-haste-spoil," as a sign that before the -child was able to say "Father" or "Mother" Rezin and Pekah should be -extinguished. For the Assyrian should speed to the plunder and haste to -the spoil, and the riches of Damascus and the spoil of Samaria should be -carried away by the King of Assyria. Since Judah despised "the soft -flowing waters of Shiloah,"[451] and preferred Rezin and Pekah,[452] -they should be deluged by the Euphrates of Assyria, and Assyria's -outspread wings should overshadow thy land, O Immanuel (viii. 1-8). How -vain, then, of the people to try and meet the confederacy of Syria and -Ephraim by new confederacy of Judah with Assyria! This, after all, is -Immanuel's land. God is with us. We have but to fear God, we have but to -be faithful to duty, and Jehovah shall be our sanctuary, though He be a -stumbling-block to many in Israel, and a snare to many in -Jerusalem.[453] This is God's teaching and God's testimony, and Isaiah -and his children are signs of it. For does not Isaiah mean "Salvation of -Jehovah"; and Shear-jashub, "A remnant shall return"; and -Maher-shalal-hash-baz, "Swift-spoil-speedy-prey"; and Immanuel, "God is -with us"? What need, then, to seek wizards and necromancers? Seek God; -confide, abide![454] Trouble and darkness there should be; but all was -not utterly hopeless. Northern Israel had been bedimmed and afflicted; -but soon they should be exalted, and see light, and their yoke be broken -as in the day of Midian, and the trampling boot and blood-stained mantle -of the warrior shall be burned in the fire: for a Child is born, a Son -is given unto us of David's line, who shall be a Mighty Deliverer, a -Prince of Peace,--and Israel shall perish. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[442] 2 Chron. xxviii. 19. - -[443] It may mean "God is good" (Tabeel). - -[444] For further explanations I must refer to my paper on Rabbinic -Exegesis (_Expositor_, First Series, v. 373). - -[445] 2 Chron. xxviii. 7. - -[446] Of Oded nothing else is known. - -[447] Some, however, interpret the name "A remnant repents" (LXX., -[Greek: ho kataleiphtheis Iasoub]; Vulg., _Qui derelictus est Jaseb_). - -[448] Isa. vi. 13. - -[449] The words "And within threescore and five years shall Ephraim be -broken, that it be not a people" (Isa. vii. 8), are almost certainly -an interpolation: for (1) the overthrow came within far less than -sixty years; (2) the clause awkwardly breaks the context; (3) the -"sixty years" is inconsistent with the promise (vii. 16) that it -should be within very few years. - -[450] Isa. vii. 1-25. - -[451] Not improbably the water which afterwards flowed through -Hezekiah's new tunnel between the Virgin's Tomb and the Pool of -Siloam. It is referred to in 2 Chron. xxxii. 3, 30 (Isa. xxii. 9-11). -See Appendix II. - -[452] This, if it be correct, can only mean that the son of Tabeal had -a party in Jerusalem; but Hitzig renders it "_dreadeth_," not -"rejoiceth in." - -[453] The meaning is by no means clear. - -[454] See Driver, _Isaiah_, p. 34. - - - - - CHAPTER XXIV - - _THE APOSTASIES OF AHAZ_ - - 2 KINGS xvi. 1-18 - - "For when we in our wickedness grow hard, - Oh misery on't! the wise gods seal our eyes; - In our own filth drop our clear judgments; make us - Adore our errors; laugh at us while we strut - To our confusion." - - -Ahaz was indifferent to these prophecies because his heart was -otherwhere. It is clear from our authorities that this king had excited -an unusually deep antipathy in the hearts of those later writers who -judged religion not only from the earlier standpoint, but from the stern -and inexorable requirements of the Deuteronomic and the Priestly Codes. -The historian, adopting an unusual phrase, says that "he did not that -which was right in the sight of the Lord, but he walked in the ways of -the kings of Israel." He not only continued the high places, as the best -of his predecessors had done, but he increased their popularity and -importance by personally offering sacrifices and burning incense "on the -hills and under every green tree." It is probable, too, that he -introduced into Judah horses and chariots dedicated to the sun.[455] "He -made molten images for the Baalim," says the Chronicler, "and burnt -incense in the valley of the son of Himmon." - -This last was his crowning atrocity: he actually sanctioned the -revolting worship of the abomination of the children of Ammon, which -Solomon had tolerated on the mount of offence. "He made his son to -pass through the fire." The Chronicler expresses it still more -dreadfully by saying that "he _burnt his children_ in the fire."[456] - -In the Valley of Ben-Hinnom, or of the Beni-Hinnom, of which the name -is perpetuated in Gehenna, the place of torture for lost souls, there -stood a frightful image of the king--Moloch, Melek, Malcham. It -represented the sun-god, worshipped, not only as Baal under the -emblems of prolific nature, but, like the Egyptian Typhon, as the -emblem of the sun's scorching and blighting force. It was perhaps a -human figure with the head of an ox. The arms of the brazen image -sloped downwards over a cistern, which was filled with fuel; and when -a human sacrifice was to be offered to him, the child was probably -first killed, and then placed on these brazen arms as a gift to the -idol. It rolled down into the flaming tank, and was consumed amid the -strains of music. Recourse was only had to the most frightful form of -human sacrifice--the burning of grown-up victims--in extremities of -disaster, as when Mesha of Moab offered up his eldest son to Chemosh -on the wall of Kir-Hareseth in the sight of his people and of the -three invading armies. But the sacrifice of children was public, and -perhaps annual. Hence Milton, following the learned researches of -Selden in his Syntagma _De Dis Syriis_, writes:-- - - "First, Moloch, horrid king, besmeared with blood - Of human sacrifice, and parents' tears; - Though, for the noise of drums and timbrels loud, - Their children's cries unheard that pass'd through fire - To his grim idol. Him the Ammonite - Worshipp'd in Rabba and her watery plain, - In Argob and in Basan, to the stream - Of utmost Arnon. Nor content with such - Audacious neighbourhood, the wisest heart - Of Solomon he led by fraud to build - His temple right against the Temple of God - On that opprobrious hill, and made his grove - The pleasant Valley of Hinnom, Tophet thence - And black Gehenna call'd, the type of hell."[457] - -But it may be doubted whether Ahaz, in spite of his frightful -position, or, in later days, the less excusable Manasseh, really -destroyed the lives of their young sons.[458] The ancients had a -notion that they could easily cheat their devil-deities. If a white ox -of Clitumnus became unfitted for a victim to Jupiter of the Capitol by -having on its body a few black spots, it was quite sufficient to make -it pass with the _Di faciles_ by chalking the black spots over -it.[459] If human victims had to be thrown into the Tiber to Hercules, -Numa taught the people that little wickerwork images (_scirpea_) would -suit the purpose just as well.[460] Figures of dough were sometimes -offered instead of human beings on the altar of Artemis of Tauris. -Thus it became the custom, it is believed, merely to throw or to pass -children through or over the flames, and conventionally to _regard -them_ as having been sacrificed, though they might escape the ordeal -with little or no hurt. This was called _februatio_, or "lustration by -fire."[461] We may hope that this device was adopted by the two Judaean -kings, and, if so, they did not add to their horrible apostasy the -crime of infanticide. If, however, Ahaz was even to the smallest -extent implicated in such foul idolatries, it is not surprising that -he was in no mood to listen to Isaiah. What is profoundly surprising, -and is indeed a circumstance for which we cannot account, is that no -word of fierce indignation was addressed to him on this account by -Urijah, the high priest, whom Isaiah seems to describe as faithful, or -by Zechariah, the son of Jeberechiah, or by Micah, or by Isaiah, who -feared man so little and God so much. - -The Assyrian party at the Court of Ahaz prevailed over the Egyptian. -Until the accession of the Ethiopian Sabaco[462] in 725, Egypt was -indeed in so weak, harassed, and divided a condition under feeble -native Pharaohs, that her help was obviously unavailable. The King of -Judah, seeing no extrication from his calamities except in the way of -worldly expediency, appealed to Tiglath-Pileser. In this he followed -the precedent of his ancestor Asa, who had diverted the attack of -Baasha by invoking the assistance of Syria. Ahaz sent to the Assyrian -potentate the humble message, "I am thy servant and thy son: come up -and save me from the Kings of Syria and Israel." If he had not faith -to accept Isaiah's promises, what else could he do, when Syria, -Israel, the Philistines, Edom, and Moab were all arrayed against him? -The ambassadors probably made their way, not without peril, along the -east of Jordan, or else by sea from Joppa, and so inland. Whether they -took with them the enormous bribe without which the appeal of the -helpless king might have been in vain, or whether this was sent -subsequently under Assyrian escort, we do not know. It was -euphemistically described as "a present" or "a blessing," but must be -regarded either as a tribute or a bribe. - -Tiglath-Pileser II. saw his opportunity, and at once invaded Damascus. -In B.C. 733 he failed, but the next year he entirely subjugated the -kingdom, and put an end to the dynasty. Rezin was probably put to death -with the horrible barbarities which were normal among the brutal -Ninevites; and as the Assyrians had no conception of colonisation or the -wise government of dependencies, the Syrian population was deported _en -masse_ to Elam and an unknown Kir.[463] For a time Damascus was made "a -ruinous heap," and the cities of Aroer were the desolated lairs of -pasturing flocks. Israel, as we have seen, was next overwhelmed by the -same irremediable catastrophe, none of her people being left except such -as might be compared to the mere gleanings of a vintage, and the few -berries on the topmost boughs of the olive tree.[464] - -Tiglath-Pileser meant to make Ahaz feel his yoke. He summoned him to -do homage at Damascus, and there Ahaz once more displayed his -cosmopolitan aestheticism at the expense of every pure tradition of the -religion of his fathers. - -His visit to Damascus was no doubt compulsory. His worldly policy, -which looked so expedient, and which--apart from the defiance which it -involved to the voice of God by His prophets--seemed to be so -pardonable, had for the time succeeded. Isaiah's promises had been -fulfilled to the letter. There was nothing more to fear either from -Rezin or from Remaliah's son. Their kingdoms were a desolation. In his -own annals Tiglath-Pileser[465] does not exaggerate his -achievements.[466] He wrote as follows:-- - - "Rezin's warriors I captured, and with the sword I destroyed. - Of his charioteers and [his horsemen] the arms I broke: - Their bow-bearing warriors, [their footmen] armed with spear and - shield, - With my hand I captured them, and those that fought in their - battle-line. - He to save his life fled away alone; - Like a deer [he ran], and entered into the great gate of his city. - His generals, whom I had taken alive, on crosses I hung; - His country I subdued; - Damascus, his city, I subdued, and like a caged bird I shut him in. - I cut down the unnumbered trees of his forest; I left not one. - Hadara, the palace of the father of Rezin of Syria, [I burnt]. - The city of Samaria I besieged, I captured; eight hundred of its - people and children I took; - Their oxen and their sheep I carried away. - I took five hundred and ninety-one cities; - Over sixteen districts of Syria like a flood I swept." - -But the more complete destruction of Israel was due to Shalmaneser -IV., who says,-- - - "The city of Samaria I besieged, I took, - I carried away twenty-seven thousand two hundred of its inhabitants; - I seized fifty of their chariots. - I gave up to plunder the rest of their possessions. - I appointed officers over them; - I laid on them the tribute of the former king. - In their place I settled the men of conquered countries." - -The immediate service to Judah looked immense. The Assyrian might safely -claim, and Ahaz might truthfully confess, that the intervention of -Tiglath-Pileser had rescued him from the apparent imminence of -destruction. But the Assyrian kings served no one for nothing. The price -which had to be paid for Tiglath-Pileser's intervention was vassalage -and tribute. Ahaz, or, as the Assyrians call him, Jehoahaz,[467] had -styled himself Tiglath-Pileser's "servant and his son," and the Assyrian -chose to have substantial proof of this parental suzerainty. The great -king therefore summoned the poor subject-potentate to Damascus, where he -was holding his victorious court. - -So far Ahaz had no reason to complain of his "dreadful patron"; and if -he had returned when he paid his homage, no immediate harm would have -happened. But during his visit he saw "the altar" (_Heb._) at the -conquered city. Was it the altar of the defeated Syrian god Rimmon? or -did the Assyrian persuade his willing vassal to sacrifice at the -portable altar of his god Assur? We may, perhaps, infer the former -from 2 Chron. xxviii. 23, where Ahaz says: "Because the gods of the -kings of Syria help them, therefore will I sacrifice to them, that -they may help me." There is room to suspect some error here, because -Rezin had fallen, and Damascus was in ruins, and Rimmon had -conspicuously failed to help or to avenge his votaries.[468] Ahaz -admired the altar, to whatever god it had been erected; and unmindful, -or perhaps unconscious, that the altar of the Temple of Jerusalem was -declared in the Pentateuch to have been divinely ordained--a fact to -which the historian does not himself refer--he sent to the head priest -Urijah a pattern of the altar which had struck his fancy at Damascus. -The subservient priest, without a murmur or a remonstrance, undertook -to have a similar altar ready for Ahaz in the Temple by the time of -his return--a crime, if crime it were, which the Chronicler conceals. -"Never any prince was so foully idolatrous," says Bishop Hall, "as -that he wanted a priest to second him. A Urijah is fit to humour an -Ahaz.[469] Greatness could never command anything which some servile -wits were not ready both to applaud and justify." Certainly we should -have hoped for more fidelity to ancient tradition from a man who -earned the approving word of Isaiah; but it is only fair and just to -admit that Urijah, in the universal ignorance which prevailed about -the codes which were afterwards collected and published as the total -legislation of the wilderness, may have viewed his obedience to the -king's commands with very different eyes from those by which it was -regarded in the sixth and fifth centuries before Christ. He may have -been frankly unaware that he was guilty of an act which would -afterwards be denounced as an apostatising enormity.[470] - -When Ahaz returned, he was so much pleased with his new plaything that -he at once acted as priest at his own new altar. Without the least -opposition from the priests--who had so sternly resisted Uzziah--he -offered burnt-offerings and meat-offerings and drink-offerings, and -sprinkled the blood of peace-offerings on his altar.[471] Not content -with this, he did not hesitate to order the removal of the huge brazen -altar from the position, in front of the Temple porch, which it had -held since the days of Solomon. He did this in order that his own -favourite altar might be in the line of vision from the court, and not -be overshadowed by the old one, which he shifted from the place of -honour to the north side. He proceeded to call his own altar "the -great altar," and ordered that the morning burnt-offering, and the -evening _minchah_, and all the principal sacrifices should henceforth -be offered upon it.[472] He did not wholly supersede the old brazen -altar, which, he said, "shall be for me to inquire by," or, as the -Hebrew may perhaps mean, "it should await"--_i.e._, "I will hereafter -consider what to do with it." - -Ahaz is charged with the additional crime of removing the ornamental -festoons of bronze pomegranates from the lavers, and the brazen oxen -from under the molten sea, which henceforth lay dishonoured, without its -proper and splendid supports, on the pavement of the court.[473] He -also took away the balustrade of the royal "ascent" from the palace to -the Temple, and made a new entrance of a less gorgeous character than -that which, in the days of Solomon, the Queen of Sheba had admired.[474] - -No doubt these proceedings helped to heighten the unpopularity of -Ahaz. But what could he do? He could, indeed, if he had had sufficient -faith, have "trusted in Jehovah," as Isaiah bade him do. But he was -under the terrific pressure of hostile circumstances, and, being a -weak and timid man, felt himself unable to resist the influence of the -haughty politicians and worldly priests by whom he was surrounded--men -who openly made Isaiah their scoff. When he invited the interposition -of Tiglath-Pileser,[475] all the other consequences of humiliation -would naturally follow. He probably disliked as much as any one to see -the great molten laver taken off the backs of the oxen which showed -the skill of the ancient Hiram, and did not admire the despoiled -aspect of the shrine of his capital. But if the King of Assyria or his -emissaries had (as the historian implies) cast greedy eyes on these -splendid objects of antiquity, the poor vassal could not refuse them. -Better, he may have thought, that these material ornaments should go -to Nineveh than that he should be forced to exact yet heavier burdens -from an impoverished people. His expedient is mentioned among his -crimes, yet no one blamed the pious Hezekiah when, under similar -circumstances, he acted in precisely the same manner.[476] - -The Chronicler gives a darker aspect to his misdoings by saying that -he cut to pieces the vessels of the house of God, and made him altars -in every corner of Jerusalem, and _bamoth_ to burn incense unto other -gods in every several city of Judah. He says, further, that he closed -the great gates of the Temple; put an end to the kindling of the -lamps, the burning of incense, and the daily offerings; and left the -whole Temple to fall into ruin and neglect.[477] We know no more of -him. He lived through an epoch marked by the final crisis in the -existence of the kingdom of Israel. Dark omens of every kind were -around him, and he seems to have been too frivolous to see them. If he -plumed himself on the removal of the two relentless invaders Rezin and -Pekah, he must have lived to feel that the terror of Assyria had come -appreciably nearer. Tiglath-Pileser had only helped Judah in -furtherance of his own designs, and his exactions came like a chronic -distress after the acuter crisis. Nor was there any improvement when -he died in 727. He was succeeded by Shalmaneser IV., and Shalmaneser -IV. by Sargon in 722, the year of the fall of Samaria. We know no more -of Ahaz. The historian says that he was buried with his fathers, and -the Chronicler adds, as in the case of Uzziah and other kings, that -he was not permitted to rest in the sepulchres of the kings.[478] He -had sown the wind; his son Hezekiah had to reap the whirlwind.[479] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[455] See 2 Kings xxiii. 11, which shows that this was not an innovation -of Manasseh's. They were common in Persia. See Q. Curtius, iii. 3. - -[456] 2 Kings xvii. 31; Ezek. xvi. 21, xxiii. 37, xxxiii. 6; Deut. -xii. 31; Jer. xix. 5. See 2 Chron. xxviii. 3; for "his son," [Hebrew: -beno], it uses [Hebrew: banav] "his sons," but perhaps generically. -Moloch-worship may have been stimulated by accounts of the Assyrian -fire-god Adrammelech (Movers, _Phoeniz._, ii. 101). On this sacrifice -of children to Moloch, which the Phoenicians referred back to the god -El or Il, once King of Byblos, who in a crisis of danger sacrificed -his eldest son Icond, see Plut., _De Superst._, Sec. 13; Diod. Sic., xx. -12-14; 2 Kings iii. 27, xvi. 3, xxi. 6; Mic. vi. 7; Doellinger, -_Judenthum u. Heidenthum_ (E. T.), i. 427-429. - -[457] This worship was to be punished by stoning (Lev. xviii. 21, xx. -2-5; Deut. xviii. 10). On the whole subject see Movers, _Phoeniz._, 64; -Jarchi _on Jer. vii._ 31; Euseb., _Praep. Ev._, iv. 16. - -[458] Josephus says that Ahaz made "a whole burnt-offering" of his -son; but his authority is very small ([Greek: kai idion holokautosen -paida]). Comp. Psalm cvi. 37. - -[459] Ignorant Romanists have often cherished the same notions about -the saints. For centuries in Spain the people bought the old gowns and -cowls of the monks, and buried their dead in them, to deceive St. -Peter into the notion that they were Dominicans or Franciscans! - -[460] See Ovid, _Fasti_, v. 659: "Scripea pro domino Tiberi jactatur -imago." They were also called _Argei_, _id._ 621; Varro, _L. L._, vi. 3. - -[461] Varro, _L. L._, v. 3. - -[462] Herod., ii. 137. Egypt., _Sebek_; Heb., _So_ (2 Kings xvii. 4), -or perhaps _Seve_; Arab., _Shab'i_. Rawlinson, _Hist. of Anct. Egypt_, -ii. 433-450. - -[463] Kir (see Amos ix. 7) is omitted in the LXX. Elam is added in Isa. -xxii. 6. Tiglath-Pileser calls the king Rasunnu Sarimirisu--_i.e._, of -Aram. See Smith, _Assyr. Discoveries_, p. 274; _Eponym Canon_, 68; -Schrader, _K. A. T._, 152 ff. - -[464] Isa. xvii. 1-11. - -[465] The name seems to be Tuklat-abal-isarra,--according to Oppert -worshipper of the son of the Zodiac--_i.e._, of Nin or Hercules. -According to Polyhistor, he was a usurper who had been a vine-dresser -in the royal gardens. He never mentions his ancestry. But see -Schrader, _K. A. T._, 217 ff., 240 ff., and in Riehm. - -[466] _Eponym Canon_, p. 121, lines 1-15. On this fall of Damascus and -Samaria, see Isa. xvii. - -[467] Jahuhazi (Schrader, _Keilinschr._, p. 263). He probably bore -both names; but, as in the case of Jeconiah, who is called Coniah, the -omission of the element "Jehovah" from his name may have been intended -as a mark of reprobation. - -[468] The remark may refer to some earlier period in the reign of -Ahaz, before the capture of Damascus. It is more probable that the -altar was used for some Assyrian deity, and the adoption of it may -have flattered Tiglath-Pileser. - -[469] 2 Kings xvi. 11, which records the zealous subservience of Urijah, -is wanting in some MSS. of the LXX. But that the altar was made, and -without his opposition, is clear from the narrative. Asa (2 Chron. xv. -8) had repaired Solomon's great altar; Hezekiah subsequently cleansed it -(_id._ xxix. 18); Manasseh rebuilt it (_Q'ri_). The brass of it -ultimately went to Babylon (Jer. lii. 17-20). - -[470] Baehr says: "It seems that Urijah, like his companion, was only -anxious for his revenues. At any rate, his conduct is a sign of the -character and standing of the priests of that time. They were 'dumb -dogs who could not bark.' They all followed their own ways, every one -for his own gain" (Isa. lvi. 10, 11). "We have in this high priest," -says the _Wuertemberg Summary_, "a specimen of those hypocrites and -belly-servants who say, 'Whose bread I eat, his song I sing'; who veer -about with the wind, and seek to be pleasant to all men; who wish to -hurt no one's feelings, but teach just what any one wants to hear." - -[471] 1 Kings viii. 64; 2 Chron. iv. 1. In this and similar instances -commentators, biassed by _a priori_ considerations, have imagined that -Ahaz did not in person offer sacrifices. But this is what the text says, -and it was the custom of kings to regard themselves as invested with -Divine attributes. Ahaz may have had this lesson impressed on his mind -by his visit to Tiglath-Pileser. See Graetz, _Gesch. der Juden._, ii. -150. Layard, _Nin. and Bab._, 472 ff., gives us pictures of Assyrian -kings ministering at their altars, which are of various shapes. - -[472] 2 Kings xvi. 15. Vulg., _paratum erit ad voluntatem meam_. The -LXX. followed another reading: [Greek: estai moi eis to proi]. Graetz -(ii. 150), for [Hebrew: lchkr], "to inquire," reads [Hebrew: lkrv] "to -draw near to." - -[473] 1 Kings vii. 23-39. - -[474] 2 Kings xvi. 18. The allusions are obscure. R.V., "the covered -way"; A.V., "the covert for the Sabbath." See 2 Chron. ix. 4. Here the -Hebr. _Q'ri_ has _Musak_, and the Vulg. _Musach Sabbati_. The LXX. -evidently did not understand it ([Greek: kai ton themelion tes -kathedras okodomesen]). For "covert for the Sabbath," Geiger suggests -"molten images for the Shame" (Bosheth-Baal, by transposition of -_Shabbath_). Comp. 2 Chron. xxviii. 2. - -[475] 2 Chron. xxviii. 20: "Tiglath-Pileser came unto him, and -distressed him, but helped him not." - -[476] 2 Kings xviii. 15, 16. - -[477] In justice to Ahaz, we should observe that (1) in every instance -the later account multiplies and magnifies and gives a darker -colouring to his offences; (2) that neither Isaiah, Micah, nor any -other prophet has a word of reproach for such enormities in Ahaz. - -[478] It is a Jewish tradition that Hezekiah would not bury his father -Ahaz in a sarcophagus, but on a bier (_Pesachin_, f. 56, 1; -_Sanhedrin_, f. 47, 1; Graetz, _Gesch. d. Juden._, ii, 224). - -[479] His name, _Chizquiyyah_, is shortened from _Yechizquiyyahoo_ -(Isa. i. 1; 2 Kings xx. 10; Hos. i. 1). It means "Jehovah's strength" -(_Gesen._), or "Yah is might" (_Furst_). - - - - - PROBABLE DATES. - - - B.C. - - 745. Accession of Tiglath-Pileser. - - 746. Death of Uzziah. Accession of Jotham. First vision of Isaiah - (Isa. vi.). - - 735. Accession of Ahaz. Syro-Ephraimitish war. - - 734-732. Siege and capture of Damascus, and ravage of Northern - Israel by Tiglath-Pileser. Visit of Ahaz to Damascus. - - 727. Accession of Shalmaneser IV. - - 722. Accession of Sargon. Capture of Samaria, and captivity of the - Ten Tribes. - - 720. Defeat of Sabaco by Sargon at Raphia. - - 715(?). Accession of Hezekiah. - - 711. Sargon captures Ashdod. - - 707. Sargon defeats Merodach-Baladan, and captures Babylon. - - 705. Murder of Sargon. Accession of Sennacherib. - - 701. Sennacherib besieges Ekron. Defeats Egypt at Altaqu. Invades - Judah, and spares Hezekiah. Invades Egypt, and sends the Rabshakeh - to Jerusalem. Disaster of Assyrians at Pelusium, and disappearance - from before Jerusalem. - - 697. Death of Hezekiah. Accession of Manasseh. - - 681. Death of Sennacherib. - - 608. Battle of Megiddo. Death of Josiah. - - 607. Fall of Nineveh and Assyria. Triumph of Babylon. - - 605. Battle of Carchemish. Defeat of Pharaoh Necho by - Nebuchadrezzar. - - 599. First deportation of Jews to Babylon by Nebuchadrezzar. - - 588. Destruction of Jerusalem. Second deportation. - - 538. Cyrus captures Babylon. - - 536. Decree of Cyrus. Return of Zerubbabel and the first Jewish - exiles. - - 458. Return of Ezra. - - - - - CHAPTER XXV - - _HEZEKIAH_ - - B.C. 715-686[480] - - 2 KINGS xviii - - "For Ezekias had done the thing that pleased the Lord, and was - strong in the ways of David his father, as Esay the prophet, who - was great and faithful in his vision, had commanded him,"--ECCLUS. - xlviii. 22. - - -The reign of Hezekiah was epoch-making in many respects, but especially -for its religious reformation, and the relations of Judah with Assyria -and with Babylon. It is also most closely interwoven with the annals of -Hebrew prophecy, and acquires unwonted lustre from the magnificent -activity and impassioned eloquence of the great prophet Isaiah, who -merits in many ways the title of "the Evangelical Prophet," and who was -the greatest of the prophets of the Old Dispensation. - -According to the notice in 2 Kings xviii. 2, Hezekiah was twenty-five -years old when he began to reign in the third year of Hoshea of -Israel. This, however, is practically impossible consistently with the -dates that Ahaz reigned sixteen years and became king at the age of -twenty, for it would then follow that Hezekiah was born when his -father was a mere boy--and this, although Hezekiah does not seem to -have been the eldest son; for Ahaz had burnt "his son," and, according -to the Chronicler, more than one son, to propitiate Moloch. Probably -Hezekiah was a boy of fifteen when he began to reign. The chronology -of his reign of twenty-nine years is, unhappily, much confused. - -The historian of the Kings agrees with the Chronicler, and the son of -Sirach, in pronouncing upon him a high eulogy, and making him equal -even to David in faithfulness. There is, however, much difference in -the method of their descriptions of his doings. The historian devotes -but one verse to his reformation--which probably began early in his -reign, though it occupied many years. The Chronicler, on the other -hand, in his three chapters manages to overlook, if not to suppress, -the one incident of the reformation which is of the deepest interest. -It is exactly one of those suppressions which help to create the deep -misgiving as to the historic exactness of this biassed and late -historian. It must be regarded as doubtful whether many of the Levitic -details in which he revels are or are not intended to be literally -historic. Imaginative additions to literal history became common among -the Jews after the Exile, and leaders of that day instinctively drew -the line between moral homiletics and literal history. It may be -perfectly historical that, as the Chronicler says, Hezekiah opened and -repaired the Temple; gathered the priests and the Levites together, -and made them cleanse themselves; offered a solemn sacrifice; -reappointed the musical services; and--though this can hardly have -been till after the Fall of Samaria in 722--invited all the Israelites -to a solemn, but in some respects irregular, passover of fourteen -days. It may be true also that he broke up the idolatrous altars in -Jerusalem, and tossed their _debris_ into the Kidron; and (again after -the deportation of Israel) destroyed some of the _bamoth_ in Israel as -well as in Judah. If he reinstituted the courses of the priests, the -collection of tithes, and all else that he is said to have done,[481] -he accomplished quite as much as was effected in the reign of his -great-grandson Josiah. But while the Chronicler dwells on all this at -such length, what induces him to omit the most significant fact of -all--the destruction of the brazen serpent? - -The historian tells us that Hezekiah "removed the _bamoth_"--the -chapels on the high places, with their ephods and teraphim--whether -dedicated to the worship of Jehovah or profaned by alien idolatry. -That he did, or attempted, something of this kind seems certain; for -the Rabshakeh, if we regard his speech as historical in its details, -actually taunted him with impiety, and threatened him with the wrath -of Jehovah on this very account. Yet here we are at once met with the -many difficulties with which the history of Israel abounds, and which -remind us at every turn that we know much less about the inner life -and religious conditions of the Hebrews than we might infer from a -superficial study of the historians who wrote so many centuries after -the events which they describe. Over and over again their incidental -notices reveal a condition of society and worship which violently -collides with what seems to be their general estimate. Who, for -instance, would not infer from this notice that in Judah, at any rate, -the king's suppression of the "high places," and above all of those -which were idolatrous, had been tolerably thorough? How much, then, -are we amazed to find that Hezekiah had not effectually desecrated -even the old shrines which Solomon had erected to Ashtoreth, Chemosh, -and Milcom[482] "at the right hand of the mount of corruption"--in -other words, on one of the peaks of the Mount of Olives, in full view -of the walls of Jerusalem and of the Temple Hill! - -"And he brake the images," or, as the R.V. more correctly renders it, -"the pillars," the _matstseboth_. Originally--that is, before the -appearance of the Deuteronomic and the Priestly Codes--no objection -seems to have been felt to the erection of a _matstsebah_. Jacob erected -one of these _baitulia_ or anointed stones at Bethel, with every sign of -Divine approval.[483] Moses erected twelve round his altar at -Sinai.[484] Joshua erected them in Shechem and on Mount Ebal. Hosea, in -one passage (iii. 4), seems to mention pillars, ephods, and teraphim as -legitimate objects of desire. Whether they have any relation to -obelisks, and what is their exact significance, is uncertain; but they -had become objects of just suspicion in the universal tendency to -idolatry, and in the deepening conviction that the second commandment -required a far more rigid adherence than it had hitherto received. - -"And cut down the groves"--or rather the Asherim, the wooden, and -probably in some instances phallic, emblems of the nature-goddess -Asherah, the goddess of fertility.[485] She is sometimes identified with -Astarte, the goddess of the moon and of love; but there is no -sufficient ground for the identification. Some, indeed, doubt whether -Asherah is the name of a goddess at all. They suppose that the word only -means a consecrated pole or pillar, emblematic of the sacred tree.[486] - -Then comes the startling addition, "And brake in pieces the brazen -serpent that Moses had made: _for unto those days the children of -Israel did burn incense to it_." This addition is all the more -singular because the Hebrew tense implies habitual worship. The story -of the brazen serpent of the wilderness is told in Num. xxi. 9; but -not an allusion to it occurs anywhere, till now--some eight centuries -later--we are told that up to this time the children of Israel had -been in the habit of burning incense to it! Comparing Num. xxi. 4, -with xxxiii. 42, we find that the scene of the serpent-plague of the -Exodus was either Zalmonah ("the place of the image") or Punon, which -Bochart connects with Phainoi, a place mentioned as famous for -copper-mines.[487] Moses, for unknown reasons, chose it as an innocent -and potent symbol; but obviously in later days it subserved, or was -mingled with, the tendency to ophiolatry, which has been fatally -common in all ages in many heathen lands. It is indeed most difficult -to understand a state of things in which the children of Israel -habitually _burned incense_ to this venerable relic, nor can we -imagine that this was done without the cognisance and connivance of -the priests. Ewald makes the conjecture that the brazen _Saraph_ had -been left at Zalmonah, and was an occasional object of Israelite -adoration in pilgrimage for the purpose. There is, however, nothing -more extraordinary in the prevalence of serpent-worship among the Jews -than in the fact that, "in the cities of Judah and the streets of -Jerusalem, we" (the Jews), "and our fathers, our kings, and our -princes, burnt incense unto the Queen of Heaven."[488] If this were -the case, the serpent may have been brought to Jerusalem in the -idolatrous reign of Ahaz. It shows an intensity of reforming zeal, and -an inspired insight into the reality of things, that Hezekiah should -not have hesitated to smash to pieces so interesting a relic of the -oldest history of his people, rather than see it abused to idolatrous -purposes.[489] Certainly, in conduct so heroic, and hatred of idolatry -so strong, the Puritans might well find sufficient authority for -removing from Westminster Abbey the images of the Virgin, which, in -their opinion, had been worshipped, and before which lamps had been -perpetually burned. If we can imagine an English king breaking to -pieces the shrine of the Confessor in the Abbey, or a French king -destroying the sacred ampulla of Rheims or the _goupillon_ of St. -Eligius, on the ground that many regarded them with superstitious -reverence, we may measure the effect produced by this startling act of -Puritan zeal on the part of Hezekiah. - -"And he called it _Nehushtan_." If this rendering--in which our A.V. and -R.V. follow the LXX. and the Vulgate--be correct, Hezekiah justified the -iconoclasm by a brilliant play of words.[490] The Hebrew words for "a -serpent" (_nachash_) and for brass (_nechosheth_) are closely akin to -each other; and the king showed his just estimate of the relic which had -been so shamefully abused by contemptuously designating it--as it was in -itself and apart from its sacred historic associations--"nehushtan," a -thing of brass. The rendering, however, is uncertain, for the phrase may -be impersonal--"one" or "they" called it Nehushtan[491]--in which case -the assonance had lost any ironic connotation.[492] - -For this act of purity of worship, and for other reasons, the -historian calls Hezekiah the best of all the kings of Judah, superior -alike to all his predecessors and all his successors. He regarded him -as coming up to the Deuteronomic ideal, and says that therefore "the -Lord was with him, and he prospered whithersoever he went forth." - -The date of this great reformation is rendered uncertain by the -impossibility of ascertaining the exact order of Isaiah's prophecies. -The most probable view is that it was gradual, and some of the king's -most effective measures may not have been carried out till after the -deliverance from Assyria. It is clear, however, that the wisdom of -Hezekiah and his counsellors began from the first to uplift Judah from -the degradation and decrepitude to which it had sunk under the reign of -Ahaz. The boy-king found a wretched state of affairs at his accession. -His father had bequeathed to him "an empty treasury, a ruined peasantry, -an unprotected frontier, and a shattered army";[493] but although he was -still the vassal of Assyria, he reverted to the ideas of his -great-grandfather Uzziah. He strengthened the city, and enabled it to -stand a siege by improving the water-supply. Of these labours we have, -in all probability, a most interesting confirmation in the inscription -by Hezekiah's engineers, discovered in 1880, on the rocky walls of the -subterranean tunnel (_siloh_) between the spring of Gihon and the Pool -of Siloam.[494] He encouraged agriculture, the storage of produce, and -the proper tendance of flocks and herds, so that he acquired wealth -which dimly reminded men of the days of Solomon. - -There is little doubt that he early meditated revolt from Assyria; for -renewed faithfulness to Jehovah had elevated the moral tone, and -therefore the courage and hopefulness, of the whole people. The -Forty-Sixth Psalm, whatever may be its date, expresses the invincible -spirit of a nation which in its penitence and self-purification began -to feel itself irresistible, and could sing:-- - - "God is our hope and strength, - A very present help in trouble. - Therefore will we not fear, though the earth be moved, - Though the hills be carried into the midst of the sea. - There is a river, the streams whereof make glad the city of - God, - The Holy City where dwells the Most High. - God is in the midst of her; therefore shall she not be - shaken: - God shall help her, and that right early. - Heathens raged and kingdoms trembled: - He lifted His voice--the earth melted away. - Jehovah of Hosts is with us; - Elohim of Jacob is our refuge."[495] - -It was no doubt the spirit of renewed confidence which led Hezekiah to -undertake his one military enterprise--the chastisement of the -long-troublesome Philistines. He was entirely successful. He not only -won back the cities which his father had lost,[496] but he also -dispossessed them of their own cities, even unto Gaza, which was their -southernmost possession--"from the tower of the watchman to the fenced -city."[497] There can be no doubt that this act involved an almost open -defiance of the Assyrian King; but if Hezekiah dreamed of independence, -it was essential for him to be free from the raids and the menace of a -neighbour so dangerous as Philistia, and so inveterately hostile. It is -not improbable that he may have devoted to this war the money which -would otherwise have gone to pay the tribute to Shalmaneser or Sargon, -which had been continued since the date of the appeal of Ahaz to -Tiglath-Pileser II. When Sargon applied for the tribute Hezekiah refused -it, and even omitted to send the customary present. - -It is clear that in this line of conduct the king was following the -exhortations of Isaiah. It showed no small firmness of character that -he was able to choose a decided course amid the chaos of contending -counsels. Nothing but a most heroic courage could have enabled him, at -any period of his reign, to defy that dark cloud of Assyrian war which -ever loomed on the horizon, and from which but little sufficed to -elicit the destructive lightning-flash. - -There were three permanent parties in the Court of Hezekiah, each -incessantly trying to sway the king to its own counsels, and each -representing those counsels as indispensable to the happiness, and -even to the existence, of the State. - -I. There was the Assyrian party, urging with natural vehemence that -the fierce northern king was as irresistible in power as he was -terrible in vengeance. The fearful cruelties which had been committed -at Beth-Arbel, the devastation and misery of the Trans-Jordanic -tribes, the obliteration and deportation of the heavily afflicted -districts of Zebulon, Naphtali, and the way of the sea in Galilee of -the nations, the already inevitable and imminent destruction of -Samaria and her king and the whole Northern Kingdom, together with -that certain deportation of its inhabitants of which the fatal policy -had been established by Tiglath-Pileser, would constitute weighty -arguments against resistance. Such considerations would appeal -powerfully to the panic of the despondent section of the community, -which was only actuated, as most men are, by considerations of -ordinary political expediency. The foul apparition of the Ninevites, -which for five centuries afflicted the nations, is now only visible to -us in the bas-reliefs and inscriptions unearthed from their burnt -palaces. There they live before us in their own sculptures, with their -"thickset, sensual figures," and the expression of calm and settled -ferocity on their faces, exhibiting a frightful nonchalance as they -look on at the infliction of diabolical atrocities upon their -vanquished enemies. But in the eighth century before Christ they were -visible to all the eastern world in the exuberance of the most brutal -parts of the nature of man. Men had heard how, a century earlier, -Assurnazipal boasted that he had "dyed the mountains of the Nairi with -blood like wool"; how he had flayed captive kings alive, and dressed -pillars with their skins; how he had walled up others alive, or -impaled them on stakes; how he had burnt boys and girls alive, put out -eyes, cut off hands, feet, ears, and noses, pulled out the tongues of -his enemies, and "at the command of Assur his god" had flung their -limbs to vultures and eagles, to dogs and bears. The Jews, too, must -have realised with a vividness which is to us impossible the cruel -nature of the usurper Sargon. He is represented on his monuments as -putting out with his own hands the eyes of his miserable captives; -while, to prevent them from flinching when the spear which he holds in -his hand is plunged into their eye-sockets, a hook is inserted -through their nose and lips and held fast with a bridle. Can we not -imagine the pathos with which this party would depict such horrors to -the tremblers of Judah? Would they not bewail the fanaticism which led -the prophets to seduce their king into the suicidal policy of defying -such a power? To these men the sole path of national safety lay in -continuing to be quiet vassals and faithful tributaries of these -destroyers of cities and treaders-down of foes. - -II. Then there was the Egyptian party, headed probably by the powerful -Shebna, the chancellor.[498] His foreign name, the fact that his -father is not mentioned, and the question of Isaiah--"What hast thou -here? and whom hast thou here, that thou hast hewed thee out a -sepulchre here?"--seem to indicate that he was by birth a foreigner, -perhaps a Syrian.[499] The prophet, indignant at his powerful -interference with domestic politics, threatens him, in words of -tremendous energy, with exile and degradation.[500] He lost his place -of chancellor, and we next find him in the inferior, though still -honourable, office of secretary (_sopher_, 2 Kings xviii. 18), while -Eliakim had been promoted to his vacant place (Isa. xxii. 21). Perhaps -he may have afterwards repented, and the doom have been -lightened.[501] Circumstances at any rate reduced him from the -scornful spirit which seems to have marked his earlier opposition to -the prophetic counsels, and perhaps the powerful warning and menace of -Isaiah may have exercised an influence on his mind. - -III. The third party, if it could even be called a party, was that of -Isaiah and a few of the faithful, aided no doubt by the influence of -the prophecies of Micah. Their attitude to both the other parties was -antagonistic. - -i. As regards the Assyrian, they did not attempt to minimise the -danger. They represented the peril from the kingdom of Nineveh as -God's appointed scourge for the transgressions of Judah, as it had -been for the transgressions of Israel. - -Thus Micah sees in imagination the terrible march of the invader by -Gath, Akko, Beth-le-Aphrah, Maroth, Lachish, and Adullam. He plays with -bitter anguish on the name of each town as an omen of humiliation and -ruin, and calls on Zion to make herself bald for the children of her -delight, and to enlarge her baldness as the vultures, because they are -gone into captivity.[502] He turns fiercely on the greedy grandees, the -false prophets, the blood-stained princes, the hireling priests, the -bribe-taking soothsayers, who were responsible for the guilt which -should draw down the vengeance. He ends with the fearful prophecy--which -struck a chill into men's hearts a century later, and had an important -influence on Jewish history--"Therefore, because of you shall Zion be -ploughed as a field, and Jerusalem become ruins, and the hill of the -Temple as heights in the wood";--though there should be an ultimate -deliverance from Migdal-Eder, and a remnant should be saved.[503] - -Similar to Micah's, and possibly not uninfluenced by it, is Isaiah's -imaginary picture of the march of Assyria, which must have been full -of terror to the poor inhabitants of Jerusalem.[504] - - "He is come to Aiath! - He is passed through Migron! - At Michmash he layeth up his baggage: - They are gone over the pass: - 'Geba,' they cry, 'is our lodging.' - Ramah trembleth: - Gibeah of Saul is fled! - Raise thy shrill cries, O daughter of Gallim! - Hearken, O Laishah! Answer her, O Anathoth! - Madmenah is in wild flight (?). - The inhabitants of Gebim gather their stuff to flee. - This very day shall he halt at Nob. - He shaketh his hand at the mount of the daughter of Zion, - The hill of Jerusalem." - -Yet Isaiah, and the little band of prophets, in spite of their perils, -did _not_ share the views of the Assyrian party or counsel submission. -On the contrary, even as they contemplate in imagination this terrific -march of Sargon, they threaten Assyria. The Assyrian might smite Judah, -but God should smite the Assyrians. He boasts that he will rifle the -riches of the people as one robs the eggs of a trembling bird, which -does not dare to cheep or move the wing.[505] But Isaiah tells him that -he is but the axe boasting against the hewer, and the wooden staff -lifting itself up against its wielder. Burning should be scattered over -his glory. The Lord of hosts should lop his boughs with terror, and a -mighty one should hew down the crashing forest of his haughty Lebanon. - -ii. Still more indignant were the true prophets against those who -trusted in an alliance with Egypt. From first to last Isaiah warned -Ahaz, and warned Hezekiah, that no reliance was to be placed on -Egyptian promises--that Egypt was but like the reed of his own Nile. -He mocked the hopes placed on Egyptian intervention as being no less -sure of disannulment than a covenant with death and an agreement with -Sheol. This rebellious reliance on the shadow of Egypt was but the -weaving of an unrighteous web, and the adding of sin to sin. It should -lead to nothing but shame and confusion, and the Jewish ambassadors to -Zoan and Egypt should only have to blush for a people that could -neither help nor profit. And then branding Egypt with the old -insulting name of Rahab, or "Blusterer," he says,-- - - "Egypt helpeth in vain, and to no purpose. - Therefore have I called her 'Rahab, that sitteth still.'" - -Indolent braggart--that was the only designation which she deserved! -Intrigue and braggadocio--smoke and lukewarm water,--this was all -which could be expected from _her_![506] - -Such teaching was eminently distasteful to the worldly politicians, -who regarded faith in Jehovah's intervention as no better than -ridiculous fanaticism, and forgot God's wisdom in the inflated -self-satisfaction of their own. The priests--luxurious, drunken, -scornful--were naturally with them. Men were fine and stylish, and in -their religious criticisms could not express too lofty a contempt for -any one who, like Isaiah, was too sincere to care for the mere -polishing of phrases, and too much in earnest to shrink from -reiteration. In their self-indulgent banquets these sleek, smug -euphemists made themselves very merry over Isaiah's simplicity, -reiteration, and directness of expression. With hiccoughing insolence -they asked whether they were to be treated like weaned babes; and then -wagging their heads, as their successors did at Christ upon the cross, -they indulged themselves in a mimicry, which they regarded as witty, -of Isaiah's style and manner. With him they said it is all,-- - - "Tsav-la-tsav, tsav-la-tsav, - Quav-la-quav, quav-la-quav, - Z'eir sham, Z'eir sham!"-- - -which may be imitated thus:--With him it is always "Bit and bit, bid -and bid, for-bid and for-bid, for_bid_ and for_bid_, a lit-tle bit -here, a lit-tle bit there."[507] Monosyllable is heaped on -monosyllable; and no doubt the speakers tipsily adopted the tones of -fond mothers addressing their babes and weanlings. Using the Hebrew -words, one of these shameless roysterers would say, "_Tsav-la-tsav, -tsav-la-tsav, quav-la-quav, quav-la-quav, Z'eir sham, Z'eir -sham_,--that is how that simpleton Isaiah speaks." And then doubtless -a drunken laugh would go round the table, and half a dozen of them -would be saying thus, "_Tsav-la-tsav, tsav-la-tsav_," at once. They -derided Isaiah just as the philosophers of Athens derided St. Paul--as -a mere _spermologos_, "a seed-pecker!"[508] or "picker-up of -learning's crumbs." Is all this petty monosyllabism fit teaching for -persons like us? Are we to be taught by copybooks? Do we need the -censorship of this Old Morality? - -On whom, full of the fire of God, Isaiah turned, and told these -scornful tipsters, who lorded it over God's heritage in Jerusalem, -that, since they disdained his stammerings, God would teach them by -men of strange lips and alien tongue. They might mimic the style of -the Assyrians also if they liked; but they should fall backward, and -be broken, and snared, and taken.[509] - -It must not be forgotten that the struggle of the prophets against these -parties was far more severe than we might suppose. The politicians of -expediency had supporters among the leading princes. The priests--whom -the prophets so constantly and sternly denounce--adhered to them; and, -as usual, the women were all of the priestly party (comp. Isa. xxxii. -9-20). The king, indeed, was inclined to side with his prophet, but the -king was terribly overshadowed by a powerful and worldly aristocracy, of -which the influence was almost always on the side of luxury, idolatry, -and oppression. - -iii. But what had Isaiah to offer in the place of the policy of these -worldly and sacerdotal advisers of the king? It was the simple command -"Trust in the Lord." It was the threefold message "God is high; God -is near; God is Love."[510] Had he not told Ahaz not to fear the -"stumps of two smouldering torches," when Rezin and Pekah seemed -awfully dangerous to Judah? So he tells them now that, though their -sins had necessitated the rushing stroke of Assyrian judgment, Zion -should not be utterly destroyed. In Isaiah "the calmness requisite for -sagacity rose from faith." Mr. Bagehot might have appealed to Isaiah's -whole policy in illustration of what he has so well described as the -military and political benefits of religion. Monotheism is of -advantage to men not only "by reason of the high concentration of -steady feeling which it produces, but also for the mental calmness and -sagacity which surely springs from a pure and vivid conviction that -the Lord reigneth."[511] Isaiah's whole conviction might have been -summed up in the name of the king himself: "Jehovah maketh strong." - -King Hezekiah, apparently not a man of much personal force, though of -sincere piety, was naturally distracted by the counsels of these three -parties: and who can judge him severely if, beset with such terrific -dangers, he occasionally wavered, now to one side, now to the other? -On the whole, it is clear that he was wise and faithful, and deserves -the high eulogy that his faith failed not. Naturally he had not within -his soul that burning light of inspiration which made Isaiah so sure -that, even though clouds and darkness might lower on every side, God -was an eternal Sun, which flamed for ever in the zenith, even when not -visible to any eye save that of Faith. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[480] The first of these dates is highly uncertain, as is the entire -chronology of this reign. I follow Kittel. - -[481] 2 Chron. xxxi. 2-21. - -[482] Josiah did this many years later (2 Kings xxiii. 13). - -[483] Gen. xxxv. 14. See Spencer, _De legg. Hebr._, i. 444; Bochart, -_Canaan_, ii. 2. - -[484] Exod. xxiv. 4. Comp. Deut. vii. 5, xii. 3, xvi. 22; Lev. xxvi. -1; 2 Chron. xiv. 3, xxxi. 1; Jer. xliii. 13; Hos. x. 2; Mic. v. 13 -(where the A.V. often has "statue" or "image"). Comp. Clem. Alex., -_Strom._, i. 24; Arnob., _c. Gent._, i. 39. - -[485] The rendering "grove" in the A.V. is borrowed from the [Greek: -alsos] of the LXX., and the _lucus_ of the Vulgate. On the connection -of the Asherah with the sacred tree of the Assyrian, see my article on -"Grove" in Smith's _Dict. of the Bible_; and Fergusson, _Nineveh and -Persepolis Restored_, 299-304. On the worship of Asherah, see 1 Kings -xv. 13; 2 Kings xxi. 3-7, xxiii. 4; 2 Chron. xv. 16; Judg. iii. 5-7, -vi. 25, xviii. 18. Baudissin in _Herzog Realencykl._, _s.v._ We may -well be startled by the prevalence of idolatry in Jerusalem revealed -in Isa. x. 11, xxvii. 9, xxix. 11, xxx. 9, 22, etc. - -[486] See Wellhausen, _Hist._, 235; Stade, _Gesch. d. V. I._, 460; W. -R. Smith, _Religion of the Semites_, 171; Cheyne, _Isaiah_, ii. 303; -Renan, _Hist. du Peuple d'Israel_, i. 230 (Prof. Driver, _Bibl. -Dict._, i. 258, 2nd edition). - -[487] _Hierozoicon_, ii. 3, Sec. 13. - -[488] Jer. xliv. 17. In the collection of antiquities of Baron -Ustinoff at Jaffa are five or six dragon-headed serpents, with ears of -copper and hollow inside. They are ancient, and were perhaps used as -talismanic copies of Nehushtan. - -[489] If this was a genuine relic, it must have been nearly eight -hundred years old. It is never mentioned elsewhere. - -[490] [Hebrew: nechushtan], "a brazen thing." The king certainly showed -a horror of sacerdotal imposture and religious materialism. Yet Renan -argues, from Isa. x. 11, xxvii. 9, xxx. 9, 22, that he must have had a -certain amount of tolerance. See _Hist. du Peuple d'Israel_, iii. 30. - -[491] 2 Kings xviii. 4. _Vayyikra_ is like the English indefinite -plural. The impersonal rendering (as in other passages) is adopted in -the Targum of Jonathan, the Peshito, etc., and by Luther, Bunsen, -Ewald, and most moderns. - -[492] This relic is still shown in the Church of St. Ambrose at Milan. -It used to be the popular notion that it would hiss at the end of the -world. The history of the Milan "relic" is that a Milanese envoy to -the court of the Emperor John Zimisces at Constantinople chose it from -the imperial treasures, being assured that it was made of the same -metal that Hezekiah had broken up (Sigonius, _Hist. Regn. Ital._, -vii.). It is probably a symbol used by some ophite sect. See Dean -Plumptre, _Dict. of Bibl._, _s.v._ "Serpent." - -[493] 2 Kings xvi. 8; Driver, _Isaiah_, 68. - -[494] The diverting of the water-courses enabled him to bring the water -into the city by a subterranean tunnel. The Saracens took a similar -precaution (Gul. Tyr., viii. 7). See Appendix II., where the inscription -is given; and compare 2 Chron. xxxii. 30. Apparently it carried the -water of Gihon to the south-east gate, where were the king's gardens. -Ecclus. xlviii. 17: "Ezekias fortified his city, and brought in water -into the midst thereof: he digged the hard rock with iron, and made -wells for water." For "water" the MSS. read "Gog," a corruption probably -for [Greek: agogon], "a conduit" (Geiger) or "Gihon" (Fritzsche). - -[495] Psalm xlvi. 1-11. - -[496] 2 Chron. xxviii. 18. - -[497] 2 Kings xviii. 8: comp. xvii. 9. Josephus says that he failed to -take Gath (_Antt._, IX. xiii. 3). - -[498] A.V., "treasurer" (_soken_; lit., "deputy" or "associate": Isa. -xxii. 15). He was "over the household." The Egyptian alliance had for -Judah, as Renan points out, some of the fascination that a Russian -alliance has often had for troubled spirits in France (_Hist. du -Peuple d'Israel_, iii. 12). - -[499] Renan says that he may have been a Sebennyite, and his name -Sebent. - -[500] Isa. xxii. 17, 18: "Behold, the Lord shall sling and sling, and -pack and pack, and toss and toss thee away like a ball into a distant -land; and there thou shalt die" (Stanley). The versions vary -considerably. - -[501] Isa. xxxvii. 2. There can be little doubt that there were not -_two_ Shebnas. - -[502] Mic. i. 10-16. See the writer's _Minor Prophets_ ("Men of the -Bible" Series), pp. 130-133, for an explanation of this enigmatic -prophecy. - -[503] Jer. xxvi. 8-24. He tells us that the prophecy was delivered in -the reign of Hezekiah. See my _Minor Prophets_, pp. 123-140. - -[504] Isa. x. 28-32. It would involve a cross-country route over -several deep ravines--_e.g._, the Wady Suweinit, near Michmash. In 1 -Sam. xiv. 2, Thenius, for "Migron," reads "the Precipice." Some take -Aiath for Ai, three miles south of Bethel. Renan says (_Hist. du -Peuple d'Israel_, iii.): "Nom d'Anathoth, arrange symboliquement." - -[505] Isa. x. 14. The metaphor of a bird's nest occurs more than once -in the boastful Assyrian records. - -[506] Isa. xxx. 1-7. Rahab means "fierceness," "insolence." For the -various uses of the word, see Job xxvi. 12; Isa. li. 9, 10, 15; Psalm -lxxxix. 9, 10, lxxxvii. 4, 5. - -[507] See Dr. S. Cox (_Expositor_, i. 98-104) on Isa. xxviii. 7-13. - -[508] Acts xvii. 18. - -[509] Isa. xxviii. 7-22. - -[510] Professor Smith, _Isaiah_, i. 12. - -[511] Bagehot, _Physics and Politics_, p. 73; Smith, _Isaiah_, 109. - - - - - CHAPTER XXVI - - _HEZEKIAH'S SICKNESS, AND THE EMBASSY FROM - BABYLON_ - - 2 KINGS xx. 1-19 - - "Thou hast loved me out of the pit of nothingness."--ISA. xxxviii. - 17 (A.V., margin). - - "See the shadow of the dial - In the lot of every one - Marks the passing of the trial, - Proves the presence of the Sun." - E. B. BROWNING. - - -In the chaos of uncertainties which surrounds the chronology of King -Hezekiah's reign, it is impossible to fix a precise date to the -sickness which almost brought him to the grave. It has, however, been -conjectured by some Assyriologists that the story of this episode has -been displaced, because it seemed to break the continuity of the -narrative of the Assyrian invasion; and that, though it is placed in -the Book of Kings after the deliverance from Sennacherib, it really -followed the earlier incursion of Sargon. This is rendered more -probable by Isaiah's promise (2 Kings xx. 6), "I will deliver thee and -this city out of the hand of the King of Assyria," and by the fact -that Hezekiah still possessed such numerous and splendid treasures to -display to the ambassadors of Merodach-Baladan. This could hardly have -been the case after he had been forced to pay a fine to the King of -Assyria of all the silver that was found in the house of the Lord, and -in the treasures of the king's house, to cut off the gold from the -doors and pillars of the Temple, and even to send as captives to -Nineveh some of his wives, and of the eunuchs of his palace.[512] The -date "in those days" (2 Kings xx. 1) is vague and elastic, and may -apply to any time before or after the great invasion. - -He was sick unto death. The only indication which we have of the -nature of his illness is that it took the form of a carbuncle or -imposthume,[513] which could be locally treated, but which, in days of -very imperfect therapeutic knowledge, might easily end in death, -especially if it were on the back of the neck. The conjecture of -Witsius and others that it was a form of the plague which they suppose -to have caused the disaster to the Assyrian army has nothing whatever -to recommend it. - -Seeing the fatal character of his illness, Isaiah came to the king -with the dark message, "Set thine house in order; for thou shalt die, -and not live." - -The message is interesting as furnishing yet another proof that even -the most positive announcements of the prophets were, and were always -meant to be, to some extent hypothetical and dependent on unexpressed -conditions. This was the case with the famous prophecy of Micah that -Zion should be ploughed down into a heap of ruins. It was never -fulfilled; yet the prophet lost none of his authority, for it was well -understood that the doom which would otherwise have been carried out -had been averted by timely penitence. - -But the message of Isaiah fell with terrible anguish on the heart of -the suffering king. He had hoped for a better fate. He had begun a -great religious reformation. He had uplifted his people, at least in -part, out of the moral slough into which they had fallen in the days -of his predecessor. He had inspired into his threatened capital -something of his own faith and courage. Surely he, if any man, might -claim the old promises which Jehovah in His loving-kindness and truth -had sworn to his father David and his father Abraham, that he being -delivered out of the hand of his enemies should serve God without -fear, walking in holiness and righteousness before Him all the days of -his life. He was but a young man still--perhaps not yet thirty years -old; further, not only would he leave behind him an unfinished work, -but he was childless,[514] and therefore it seemed as if with him -would end the direct line of the house of David, heir to so many -precious promises. He has left us--it is preserved in the Book of -Isaiah--the poem which he wrote on his recovery, but which enshrines -the emotion of his agonising anticipations[515]:-- - - "I said, In the noontide of my days I shall go into the gates of - Sheol. - I am deprived of the residue of my years. - I said, I shall not see Yah, Yah, in the land of the living, - I shall behold no man more, when I am among them that cease to be. - Mine habitation is removed, and is carried away from me like a - shepherd's tent. - Like a weaver I have rolled up my life; he will cut me from the - thrum. - - * * * * * - - Like a swallow or a crane, so did I chatter; - I did mourn as a dove; mine eyes fail with looking upward. - O Lord, I am oppressed; be Thou my surety." - -We must remember, as we contemplate his utter prostration of soul, -that he was not blessed, as we are, with the sure and certain hope of -the resurrection to eternal life. All was dim and dark, to him in the -shadowy world of _eidola_ beyond the grave, and many a century was to -elapse before Christ brought life and immortality to light. To enter -Sheol meant to Hezekiah to pass beyond the cheerful sunshine of earth -and the felt presence of God. No more worship, no more gladness there! - - "For Sheol cannot praise Thee, Death cannot celebrate Thee; - They that go down into the pit cannot hope for Thy truth." - -On every ground, therefore, the feelings of Hezekiah, had he not been a -worshipper of God, might have been like those of Mycerinus, and, like -that legendary Egyptian king, he might have cursed God before he died. - - "My father loved injustice, and lived long; - I loved the good he scorned and hated wrong-- - The gods declare my recompense to-day. - I looked for life more lasting, rule more high; - And when six years are measured, lo, I die! - Yet surely, O my people, did I ween - Man's justice from the all-just gods was given, - A light that from some upper point did beam, - Some better archetype whose seat was heaven: - A light that, shining from the blest abodes, - Did shadow somewhat of the life of gods." - -The indignation of Mycerinus often finds an echo on Pagan tombstones, -as in the famous epitaph on the grave of the girl Procope:-- - - "I, Procope, lift up my hands against the gods, - Who took me hence undeserving, - Aged nineteen years." - -It was far otherwise with Hezekiah. There was anguish in his heart, -but no rebellion or defiance. He wept sore; he turned his face to the -wall and wept;[516] but as he wept he also prayed, and said,-- - -"O Lord, remember now how I have walked before Thee in truth, and with -a perfect heart, and have done that which is good in Thy sight." - -Isaiah, after delivering his dark message, and doubtless adding to it -such words of human consolation as were possible--if under such -circumstances any were possible--had left the king's chamber. On every -ground his feelings must have been almost as overwhelmed with sorrow as -those of the king. Hezekiah was personally his friend, and the hope of -his nation. Doubtless the prophet's prayers rose as fervently and as -effectually as those of Luther, which snatched his friend Melanchthon -back from the very gates of death. By the time that he had reached the -middle of the court,[517] he felt borne in upon him, by that Divine -intuition which constituted his prophetic call, the certainty that God -would withdraw the immediate doom which he had been commissioned to -announce. It has been conjectured by some that the conviction was -deepened in his mind by observing on the steps of Ahaz one of those -remarkable but rare effects of refraction--or, as some have conjectured, -of a solar eclipse, involving an obscuration of the upper limb of the -sun--which had seemed to take the advancing shadow ten steps backwards; -and that this was to him a sign from heaven of the promise of God and -the prolongation of the king's life. Awestruck and glad, he hastened -back into the presence of the dying king with the life-giving message -that God had heard his prayer, and seen his tears, and would add fifteen -years to his life, and would defend him, and deliver him and Jerusalem -out of the hand of the King of Assyria. And this should be the sign to -him from Jehovah--Jehovah would bring again the shadow ten steps up the -stairs of Ahaz. To this sign--if it was visible from the -chamber-window--he called the attention of the astonished king.[518] - -We here naturally follow the narrative of Isaiah himself, as more -authoritative than that of the historian of the Kings as to details in -which they differ.[519] Not only is it quite in accordance with all -that we know of history that slight variations should occur in the -traditions of long-past times, but the text of the Book of Kings -suggests some difficulty. There we read that Hezekiah asked Isaiah -what should be the sign of the promise--not mentioned in Isaiah--that -he should go up to the House of the Lord the third day. Isaiah then -asked him whether the sign should be that the shadow should advance -ten steps, or recede ten steps. But there is no interrogation in the -Hebrew, which rather means, "The shadow hath advanced ten steps ... if -it shall recede ten steps?" or if we insert the interrogation in the -first clause, "Hath the shadow advanced ten steps?"[520] The king's -natural answer to so strange an alternative would be that for the -shadow to advance ten steps was nothing; whereas its retrogression -would be a sign indeed. Then Isaiah cried unto Jehovah, and the shadow -went backward. In the obvious divergence of details we naturally -follow Isaiah himself; and if it be a true and understood rule of all -theology, "_Miracula non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem_," the -miracle in this case--in the opportuneness of its occurrence, and the -issues which it inspired--was none the less a miracle because it was -carried out in direct accordance with God's unseen, perpetual, -miraculous Providence, which none but unbelievers will nickname -Chance. That we are here dealing with an historic incident is certain; -and they who see and acknowledge God in all history find no difficulty -at all in seeing His dealings with men in striking interpositions. But -these, by the analogy of His whole Divine economy, would naturally be -out in accordance with natural laws. - -The words rendered "the sun-dial of Ahaz" mean no more than "the steps -[_ma'aloth_] of Ahaz." Ahaz evidently was a king of aesthetic tastes, -who was fond of introducing foreign novelties and curiosities into -Jerusalem.[521] Steps, with a staff on the top of them as a gnomon, to -serve as sun-dials had been invented at Babylon, and Ahaz may probably -have become acquainted with their form and use when he paid his visit to -Tiglath-Pileser at Damascus. No one could blame him--it was indeed a -meritorious act--to introduce to his people so useful an invention. The -word "hour" first occurs in Dan. iii. 6, and it was doubtless from -Babylon that the Hebrews borrowed the division of days into hours. This -is the earliest instance in the Bible of the mention of any instrument -to measure time. That the recession of the shadow could be caused by -refraction is certain, for it has been observed in modern days. Thus, as -is mentioned by Rosenmueller, on March 27th, 1703, Pere Romauld, prior of -the monastery at Metz, noticed that the shadow on his dial deviated an -hour and a half, owing to refraction in the higher regions of the -atmosphere.[522] Or again, according to Mr. Bosanquet, the same effect -might have been produced by the darkening shadow of an eclipse. But -while he appealed to Divine indications the great prophet did not -neglect natural remedies. He ordered that a cake of figs should be laid -on the imposthume. It was a recognised and an efficient remedy, still -recommended, centuries later, by Dioscorides, by Pliny, and by St. -Jerome. By God's blessing on man's therapeutic care, the king was -speedily rescued from the gates of death. Constantly in Scripture what -we call the miraculous and what we call the providential are mingled -together. To those who regard the providential as a constant miracle, -the question of the miraculous becomes subordinate.[523] - -With intense joy and gratitude the king hailed the respite which God -had granted him. In fifteen years much might be done, much might be -hoped for. All this he acknowledged with deep feeling in the song -which he wrote on his recovery. - - "I shall go as in solemn procession[524] all my years because of the - bitterness of my soul. - O Lord, by these things men live, - And wholly therein is the life of my spirit. - Behold, it was for my peace that I had great bitterness; - But Thou hast loved my soul from the pit of nothingness: - For Thou hast cast all my sins behind Thy back. - - * * * * * - - The Lord is ready to save me; - Therefore will we sing my songs to the stringed instruments - All the days of our life in the house of the Lord."[525] - -"The wonder done in the land" was, according to the Chronicler, one of -the grounds for the embassy which, after his recovery, Hezekiah -received from Merodach-Baladan, the patriot prince of Babylon. The -other ostensible object of the embassy was to send letters and a -present in congratulation for the king's restoration to health. But -the real object lay deeper, out of sight. It was to secure a southern -alliance for Babylon against the incessant tyranny of Nineveh. - -Merodach-Baladan is mentioned in the inscriptions of Sargon.[526] He -is described as "Merodach-Baladan, son of Baladan, King of Sumir and -Accad, king of the four countries, and conqueror of all his enemies." -There had been long struggles, lasting indeed for centuries, between -the city on the Euphrates and the city on the Tigris. Sometimes one, -sometimes the other, had been victorious. Babylon--on the monuments -Kur-Dunyash--had its original Accadian name of Ca-dinirra, which, like -its Semitic equivalent Bal-el, means "Gate of God." Kalah (Larissa and -Birs Nimroud) had been built by Shalmaneser I. before B.C. 1300. His -son conquered Babylon, but not permanently; for in some later raid the -Babylonians got possession of his signet-ring, with its proud -inscription, "Conqueror of Kur-Dunyash," and it was not recovered by -the Assyrians till six centuries later, when it fell into the hands of -Sennacherib. About 1150 Nebuchadrezzar I. of Babylon thrice invaded -Assyria, but there was again peace and alliance in 1100. -Merodach-Baladan I. reigned before 900. The king who now sought the -friendship of Hezekiah was the second of the name. He seized or -recovered the throne of Babylon in 721, after the death of -Shalmaneser, perhaps because Sargon was a usurper of dubious descent. -He helped the Elamites against Assyria. Sargon was compelled to -retreat to Assyria, but returned in 712, and drove Merodach-Baladan to -flight. He was captured and taken to Assyria. But on the murder of -Sargon in 705, he again managed to seize the throne of Babylon, killed -the viceroy who had been set up, and became king for six months. After -this, Sennacherib invaded his country, defeated him, and drove him -once more to flight. He was perhaps killed by his successor. - -Whether his overtures to Hezekiah took place before his defeat by -Sargon, or after his escape, is uncertain. In either case he doubtless -sent a splendid embassy, for Babylon was far-famed for its golden -magnificence as "the glory of kingdoms" and "the beauty of the -Chaldees' excellency."[527] At that time the Jews knew but little of -the far-off city which was destined to be so closely interwoven with -their future fortunes, as it was mingled with their oldest and dimmest -traditions.[528] Apart from the magnificence of the presents brought -to him, it was not unnatural that Hezekiah should regard this embassy -with intense satisfaction. It was flattering to the power of his -little kingdom that its alliance should be sought by the far-off and -powerful capital on the great river;[529] it was still more -encouraging to know that the frightful Nineveh had a strong enemy not -far from her own frontier. Merodach-Baladan's ambassadors would be -sure to inform Hezekiah that their lord had flung off the authority of -Sargon, had kept him at bay for many years, and was still the -undisputed king of the dominions snatched from the common enemy. It -might have seemed reasonable that Hezekiah, for his part, should -desire to leave the most favourable impression of his wealth and power -on the mind of his distant and magnificent ally. He "hearkened unto" -the ambassadors, or, more properly, "he was glad of them" (R.V.),[530] -and "showed them all the house of his spicery and other treasures, his -precious unguents, his armoury, his bullion, plate, and the whole -resources of his kingdom." The Chronicler regards this as ingratitude -to God. He says that "Hezekiah rendered not again according unto the -benefits done unto him; for his heart was lifted up: therefore there -was wrath upon him, and upon Judah and Jerusalem." It is a severe -judgment of later times, and the historian of the Kings pronounces no -such censure. Nevertheless, he records the stern sentence pronounced -by Isaiah. The prophet had seen through the secret diplomacy of the -Babylonian ambassadors, and knew that the real object of their mission -was to induce his king to revolt against Assyria in reliance on an arm -of flesh. He came to ask Hezekiah whose these men were, whence they -came, and what they had said. The king told him who they were, and how -he had received them; but he did not think it wise to reveal their -secret proposals. If Isaiah had so vehemently reproved all -negotiations with Egypt, there was little probability that he would -sanction the overtures of Babylon. He saw in Hezekiah's conduct a vein -of ostentatious elation, a swerving from theocratic faith; and with -remarkable prophetic insight convinced the king of the error and -impolicy of his proceedings, by announcing that the final and, in -fact, irrevocable captivity of Judah would ultimately come, not from -Nineveh, the fierce enemy, whose cloud of war was lurid on the -horizon, but from Babylon, the apparently weaker friend, who was now -making overtures of amity. With what heartrending grief must the king -have heard the doom that the display of his treasures would prove to -be in the future an incentive to the cupidity of the kings of Babylon, -and that they would sweep away all those precious things to the banks -of the Euphrates with such final overthrow that even the descendants -of David should be sunk to the infinite degradation of being eunuchs -in the palace of the King of Babylon.[531] The doom seems to have been -fulfilled in part in the reign of Hezekiah's son, and more fearfully -in the days of his great-grandchildren.[532] - -The king's pride was humbled to the dust. In the spirit of Job--"The -Lord gave, and the Lord hath taken away; blessed be the name of the -Lord"[533]--he resigned himself without a murmur to the will of -Heaven, and exclaimed that all which God did must be well done. At -least God granted him a respite. Peace and truth would be in his own -days; for that let him be thankful. They were words of humble -resignation, uttered by one who had learnt to believe that whatever -God decreed was just and right. - -It would be unjust to measure the feelings of those far centuries by -those of our own day, and there was none of the gross selfishness in -the words of Hezekiah which led Nero to quote the line-- - - "When I am dead, let earth be mixed with fire"; - -or which led Louis XIV. to say-- - - "Apres moi le deluge." - -We may perhaps trace in his exclamation something of the fatalism -which gives a touch of apathy to the submissiveness of the Oriental. -Some, too, have imagined that his distress was tinged by a gleam of -happiness at the implicit promise that he should have a son. His -wife's name was Hephzibah ("My delight is in her"), and within two -years she brought forth the firstborn son, whose career, indeed, was -dark and evil, but who became in due time an ancestor of the promised -Messiah. The name "Manasseh" given him by his parents recalled the -child born to Joseph in the land of his exile who had caused him to -forget his sorrows.[534] Hezekiah had the spirit which says,-- - - "That which Thou blessest is most good, - And unblest good is ill; - And all is right which seems most wrong, - So it be Thy sweet will." - - -FOOTNOTES: - -[512] One of the first to point out the _necessary_ rearrangement of -the events of Hezekiah's reign was Dr. Hincks, in his paper on "A -Rectification of Chronology which the newly discovered Apis-steles -render necessary" (_Journ. of Sacred Lit._, October 1858). See my -article on Hezekiah, Smith, _Dict. of the Bible_, 2nd ed., ii. 1251. - -[513] Heb., _sh'chin_; LXX., [Greek: helkos]; Vulg., _ulcus_. - -[514] The Rabbis even make his sickness the punishment for his having -neglected to secure an heir. He pleads that he foresaw the wickedness -of his son. Isaiah tells him not to try to forestall God (_Berachoth_, -f. 10, 1). - -[515] Isa. xxxviii. 10-20. - -[516] Comp. 1 Kings xxi. 4 (Ahab). - -[517] 2 Kings xx. 4. The _Q'ri_ or "read" text is, as here rendered, -_chatsee_ (comp. 1 Kings vii. 8), and is followed by the LXX. ([Greek: -en te aule te mese]), by the Vulgate (_mediam partem atrii_), and by the -A.V. The R.V., which adopts the Kethib or written text, _ha'ir_, renders -it "the middle part of the city." If this be the true reading, it would -mean that Isaiah had gone some distance from the palace, and was now -perhaps in the Valley between the Upper and the Lower City. But it seems -not improbable that (1) "the steps of Ahaz" would be in the royal court, -and (2) the answer of God, like the mercy of Christ to the suffering, -may have come promptly as an echo to the appealing cry. - -[518] The LXX. calls "the stairs" [Greek: anabathmous tou oikou tou -patros sou], and so, too, Josephus (_Antt._, X. ii. 1). The Targum -calls them "an hour-stone." Symmachus has, [Greek: strepso ten skian -ton grammon he katebe en horologio Achaz]. - -[519] It should, however, be observed that on the question of priority -critics are divided. Grotius, Vitringa, Paulus, Drechsler, etc., -thought that the account in the Book of Isaiah is the original; De -Wette, Maurer, Koster, Winer, Driver, etc., regard that account as a -later abbreviation, perhaps from a common source. - -[520] See Professor Lumby, _ad loc._ - -[521] There is an exactly similar sun-dial not far from Delhi. - -[522] _Journ. of Asiatic Soc._, xv. 286-293. - -[523] Figs have a recognised use for imposthumes. See Dioscorides and -Pliny quoted in Celsius, _Hierobot._, ii. 373. In the passage of -_Berachoth_ quoted above, Hezekiah in his sickness asks Isaiah to give -him his daughter in marriage, that he may have an heir. Isaiah replies -that the decree of his death is irrevocable. The king bids Isaiah -depart, and says (quoting Job xiii. 15) that a man must not despair, -even if a sword is laid on his neck. - -[524] Comp. Psalm xlii. 4. - -[525] Isa. xxxviii. 10-20. - -[526] The Babylonian form of his name is Marduk-habal-iddi-na--_i.e._, -"Merodach gave a son." He is the Mardokempados of the _Ptolemaic -Canon_, and the second fragment of his reign (six months) is mentioned -by Polyhistor (_ap._ Euseb.). Josephus calls him Baladan (_Antt._, X. -ii. 2). He was originally the prince of the Chaldaean _Bit Yakim_. -Sargon calls him "Merodach-Baladan, the foe, the perverse, who, -contrary to the will of the great gods, ruled as king at Babylon." He -displaced him for a time by "Belibus, the son of a wise man, whom one -had reared like a little dog" (as we might say "like a tame cat") "in -my palace" (Schrader, ii. 32). In the Assyrian records he is often -called (by mistake?) "the son of Yakim." For the adventures of the -Babylonian hero, see Schrader, _K. A. T._, 213 ff., 224 ff., 227, and -in Riehm, _Handwoerterbuch_, ii. 982. - -[527] Isa. xiv. 4, xiii. 19. - -[528] Gen. x. 10, 11, xi. 1-9. - -[529] Jos., _Antt._, X. ii. 2: [Greek: Symmachon te auton einai -parekalei kai philon.] - -[530] 2 Kings xx. 13. LXX., [Greek: echare]. - -[531] See Dan. i. 6. - -[532] 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11. - -[533] Job i. 21. - -[534] Manasseh seems to mean "one who forgets." See Gen. xli. 51. It -was the name of the husband of Judith (Judith viii. 2), and is found -in Ezra x. 30, 33. - - - - - CHAPTER XXVII - - _HEZEKIAH AND ASSYRIA_ - - B.C. 701 - - 2 KINGS xviii. 13--xix. 37. - - [Greek: All' ho sophotatos basileus ouch hopla tais ekeinon - blasphemiais, alla proseuchen kai dakrya kai sakkon - antetaxen.]--THEODORET. - - "When, sudden--how think ye the end? - Did I say 'without friend'? - Say rather from marge to blue marge - The whole sky grew his targe, - With the sun's self for visible boss, - While an Arm ran across - Which the earth heaved beneath like a breast, - Where the wretch was safe pressed." - BROWNING. - - -Although during a few memorable scenes the relations of Judah with -Assyria in the reign of Hezekiah leap into fierce light, many previous -details are unfortunately left in the deepest obscurity--an obscurity -all the more impenetrable from the lack of certain dates. It will -perhaps help to simplify our conceptions if we first sketch what is -known of Assyria from the cuneiform inscriptions, and then fill up the -sketch of those scenes which are more minutely delineated in the Book -of Kings and in the prophecies of Isaiah. - -Sargon--perhaps a successful general of royal blood, though he never -calls himself the son of any one[535]--seems to have usurped the -throne on the death of Shalmaneser IV., during the siege of Samaria in -B.C. 722. He took Samaria, deported its inhabitants, and repeopled it -from the Assyrian dominions. "In their place," he says, in his tablets -in the halls of his palace at Khorsabad, "I settled the men of -countries conquered [by my hand]."[536] In 720 he suppressed a futile -attempt at revolt, headed by a pretender named Yahubid, in Hamath, -which he reduced to "a heap of ruins." For some years after this he -was occupied mainly on his northern frontiers, but he tells us that -until 711 tribute continued to come in from Judah and Philistia. -Meanwhile, these terrified and oppressed feudatories, writhing under -the remorseless dominion of Nineveh, naturally began to listen to the -intrigues of Egypt, whose interest it was to create a bulwark between -herself and the invasion of the armies which were the abhorrence of -the world. Under the influence of Sabaco, which gave new strength and -unity to Egypt, she succeeded in seducing Ashdod from its allegiance -to Sargon. Sargon at once deposed Azuri, King of Ashdod, and put his -brother Ahimit in his place. The Ashdodites soon after deposed Ahimit, -and elected in his place Jaman, who was in alliance with Sabaco.[537] -This revolt was evidently favoured by Judah, Edom, and Moab; for -Sargon says that they, as well as the people of Philistia, "were -speaking treason." The rebellion was crushed by Sargon's -promptitude.[538] He tells his own tale thus:-- - -"In the wrath of my heart I did not divide my army, and I did not -diminish the ranks, but I marched against Ashdod with my warriors, -who did not separate themselves from the traces of my sandals. I -besieged, I took Ashdod and Gunt-Asdodim. I then re-established these -towns. I placed [in them] the people whom my arms had conquered, I put -over them my lieutenant as governor. I regarded them as Assyrians, and -they practised obedience."[539] - -Sargon does not, however, seem to have conducted this campaign in -person; for we read in Isa. xx. 1 that he sent his Turtan--_i.e._, his -commander-in-chief,[540] whose name seems to have been Zir-bani--to -Ashdod, who fought against it and took it. The wretched Philistines -had put their trust in Sabaco. "The people," says Sargon, "and their -evil chiefs sent their presents to Pharaoh, King of Egypt, a prince -who could not save them, and besought his alliance." Isaiah had for -three years been indicating how vain this policy was by one of those -acted parables which so powerfully affect the Eastern mind. He had, by -the word of the Lord, stripped the shoes from on his feet and the -upper robe of sackcloth from his loins, and walked, "naked and -barefoot, for a sign and portent against Egypt and Ethiopia," to -indicate that even thus should the people of Egypt and Ethiopia be -carried away as captives, naked and barefoot, by the kings of Assyria. -Egypt was the boast of one party at Jerusalem, and Ethiopia, which had -now become master of Egypt under Sabaco, was their expectation; but -Isaiah's public self-humiliation showed how utterly their hopes -should come to nought.[541] Before the outbreak at Ashdod, Sargon had -suppressed a revolt of Hanun, or Hanno, King of Gaza, and Egypt and -Assyria first met face to face at Raphia (about B.C. 720), where -Sabaco fought in person with an Egyptian contingent, at a spot -half-way between Gaza and the "river of Egypt."[542] Sabaco, whom -Sargon calls "the Sultan of Egypt" (Siltannu Muzri), had been -defeated, and fled precipitately, but Sargon was not then sufficiently -free from other complications to advance to the Nile. The hoarded -vengeance of Assyria was inflicted upon Egypt nearly a century later -by Esarhaddon and Assurbanipal. - -In the two suppressions of revolt at Ashdod, Sargon or his Turtan must -have come perilously near Jerusalem, and perhaps he may have inflicted -sufficient damage to admit of the boast that he had "conquered" Judaea. -If so, his military vanity made him guilty of an exaggeration. - -Far more serious to Sargon was the revolt of Merodach-Baladan, King of -Chaldaea. Babylon had always been a rival of Nineveh in the competition -for world-wide dominion, and for twelve years, as Sargon says, -Merodach-Baladan had been "sending ambassadors"[543]--to Hezekiah among -others--in the patient effort to consolidate a formidable league. Elam -and Media were with him; and at a solemn banquet, for which they had -"spread the carpets,"[544] and eaten and drank, the cry had risen, -"Arise, ye princes! anoint the shield." Standing in ideal vision on his -watch-tower, Isaiah saw the sweeping rush of the Assyrian troops on -their horses and camels on their way to Babylon. What should come of it? -The answer is in the words, "Fallen, fallen is Babylon, and all the -images of her gods he [Sargon] hath broken to the ground." Alas! there -is no hope from Babylon or its embassy! Would that Isaiah could have -held out a hope! But no, "O my threshed one, son of my threshing-floor, -that which I have heard from the Lord of hosts, the God of Israel, that -have I declared unto you."[545] And so it came to pass. The brave -Babylonian was defeated. In 709 Sargon occupied his palace, took -Dur-yakin, to which he had fled for refuge, and made himself Lord -Paramount as far as the Persian Gulf. It was his last great enterprise. -He built and adorned his palaces, and looked forward to long years of -peace and splendour; but in 705 the dagger-thrust of an assassin--a -malcontent of the town of Kullum--found its way to his heart; and -Sennacherib reigned in his stead. - -Sennacherib--Sin-ahi-irba ("Sin, the moon-god, has multiplied -brothers")[546]--was one of the haughtiest, most splendid, and most -powerful of all the kings of Assyria, though the petty state of Judah, -relying on her God, defied and flouted him. The son of a mighty -conqueror, at the head of a magnificent army, he regarded himself as -the undisputed lord of the world.[547] Born in the purple, and bred up -as crown prince, his primary characteristic was an overweening pride -and arrogance, which shows itself in all his inscriptions. He calls -himself "the Great King, the Powerful King, the King of the Assyrians, -of the nations of the four regions, the diligent ruler, the favourite -of the Great Gods, the observer of sworn faith, the guardian of law, -the establisher of monuments, the noble hero, the strong warrior, the -first of kings, the punisher of unbelievers, the destroyer of wicked -men."[548] He was mighty both in war and peace. His warlike glories -are attested by Herodotus, by Polyhistor, by Abydenus, by Demetrius, -and by his own annals. His peaceful triumphs are attested by the great -palace which he erected at Nineveh, and the magnificent series of -sculptured slabs with which he adorned it; by his canals and -aqueducts, his gateways and embankments, his Bavian sculpture, and his -_stele_ at the Nahr-el-Kelb. He was a worthy successor of his father -Sargon, and of the second Tiglath-Pileser--active in his military -enterprises, indefatigable, persevering, full of resource.[549] - -On one of his bas-reliefs we see this magnificent potentate seated on -his throne, holding two arrows in his right hand, while his left -grasps the bow. A rich bracelet clasps each of his brawny arms. On his -head is the jewelled pyramidal crown of Assyria, with its embroidered -lappets. His dark locks stream down over his shoulders, and the long, -curled beard flows over his breast. His strongly marked, sensual -features wear an aspect of unearthly haughtiness. He is clad in -superbly broidered robes, and his throne is covered with rich -tapestries, and bas-reliefs of Assyrians or captives, who, like the -Greek caryatides, uphold its divisions with their heads and arms. - -Yet all this glory faded into darkness, and all this colossal pride -crumbled into dust. Sennacherib not only died, like his father, by -murder, but by the murderous hands of his own sons, and after the -shattering of all his immense pretensions--a defeated and dishonoured -man. - -One of his invasions of Judaea occupies a large part of the Scripture -narrative.[550] It was the fourth time of that terrible contact -between the great world-power which symbolised all that was tyrannic -and idolatrous, and the insignificant tribe which God had chosen for -His own inheritance. - -In the reign of Ahaz, about B.C. 732, Judah had come into collision -with Tiglath-Pileser II. - -Under Shalmaneser IV. and Sargon, the Northern Kingdom had ceased to -exist in 722. - -Under Sargon, Judah had been harassed and humbled, and had witnessed -the suppression of the Philistian revolt, and of the defeat of the -powerful Sabaco at Raphia about 720. - -Now came the fourth and most overwhelming calamity. If the patriots of -Jerusalem had placed any hopes in the disappearance of the ferocious -Sargon, they must speedily have recognised that he had left behind him -a no less terrible successor. - -Sennacherib reigned apparently twenty-four years (B.C. 705-681). On -his accession he placed a brother, whose name is unknown, on the -vice-regal throne of Babylon, and contented himself with the title of -King of the Assyrians. This brother was speedily dethroned by a -usurper named Hagisa, who only reigned thirty days, and was then slain -by the indefatigable Merodach-Baladan, who held the throne for six -months. He was driven out by Belibus, who had been trained "like a -little dog" in the palace of Nineveh,[551] but was now made King of -Sumir and Accad--_i.e._, of Babylonia. Sennacherib entered the palace -of Babylon and carried off the wife of Merodach and endless spoil in -triumph, while Merodach fled into the land of Guzumman, and (like the -Duke of Monmouth) hid himself "among the marshes and reeds," where the -Assyrians searched for him for five days, but found no trace of him. -After three years (702-699) Belibus proved faithless, and Sennacherib -made his son Assur-nadin-sum viceroy of Babylon. - -His second campaign was against the Medes in Northern Elam. - -His third (701) was against the Khatti (the Hittites)--_i.e._, against -Phoenicia and Palestine.[552] He drove King Luli from Sidon "by the mere -terror of the splendour of my sovereignty," and placed Tubalu (_i.e._, -Ithbaal) in his place, and subdued into tributary districts Arpad, -Byblos, Ashdod, Ammon, Moab, and Edom, suppressing at the same time a -very abortive rising in Samaria. "All these brought rich presents and -kissed my feet." He also subdued Zidka, King of Askelon, from whom he -took Beth-Dagon, Joppa, and other towns. Padi, the King of Ekron, was a -faithful vassal of Assyria; he was therefore deposed by the revolting -Ekronites, and sent in chains into the safe custody of Hezekiah, who -"imprisoned him in darkness." The rebel states all relied on the -Egyptians and Ethiopians. Sennacherib fought against Egyptians and -Ethiopians, "in reliance upon Assur my God," at Altaqu (B.C. 701), and -claims to have defeated them, and carried off the sons and charioteers -of the King of Egypt, and the charioteers of the kings of Ethiopia.[553] -He then tells us that he punished Altaqu and Timnath.[554] He impaled -the rebels of Ekron on stakes all round the city. He restored Padi, and -made him a vassal. "Hezekiah [Chazaqiahu] of Judah, who had not -submitted to my yoke, the terror of the splendour of my sovereignty -overwhelmed. Himself as a bird in a cage, in the midst of Jerusalem, his -royal city, I shut up. The Arabians and his dependants, whom he had -introduced for the defence of Jerusalem, his royal city, together with -thirty talents of gold, eight hundred of silver, bullion, precious -stones, ivory couches and thrones, an abundant treasure, with his -daughters, his harem, and his attendants, I caused to be brought after -me to Nineveh. He sent his envoy to pay tribute and render homage." At -the same time, he overran Judaea, took forty-six fenced cities and many -smaller towns, "with laying down of walls, hewing about, and trampling -down," and carried off more than two hundred thousand captives with -their spoil. Part of Hezekiah's domains was divided among three -Philistine vassals who had remained faithful to Assyria. - -It was in the midst of this terrible crisis that Hezekiah had sent to -Sennacherib at Lachish his offer of submission, saying, "I have -offended; return from me; that which thou puttest upon me I will -bear."[555] The spoiling of the palace and Temple was rendered necessary -to raise the vast mulct which the Assyrian King required.[556] - -It is at Lachish--now Um-Lakis, a fortified hill in the Shephelah, -south of Jerusalem, between Gaza and Eleutheropolis--that we catch -another personal glimpse of the mighty oppressor. We see him depicted, -on his triumphal tablets, in the palace-chambers of Kouyunjik, -engaged in the siege; for the town offered a determined -resistance,[557] and required all the energies and all the trained -heroism of his forces. We see him next, carefully painted, seated on -his royal throne in magnificent apparel, with his tiara and bracelets, -receiving the spoils and captives of the city. The inscription says: -"Sennacherib, the mighty king, the king of the country of Assyria, -sitting on the throne of judgment at the entrance of the city of -Lakisha. I give permission for its slaughter." He certainly implied -that he took the city, but a doubt is thrown on this by 2 Chron. -xxxii. 1, which only says that "he _thought_ to win these cities"; and -the historian says (2 Kings xix. 8) that he "departed from Lachish." -Lachish was evidently a very strong city, and it is so depicted in the -palace-tablets at Kouyunjik. It had been fortified by Rehoboam, and -had furnished a refuge to the wretched Amaziah.[558] - -If Judah and Jerusalem had listened to the messages of Isaiah,[559] -they might have been saved the humiliating affliction which seemed to -have plunged the brief sun of their prosperity into seas of blood. He -had warned them incessantly and in vain. He had foretold their -present desolation, in which Zion should be like a woman seated on the -ground, wailing in her despair. He had taught them that formalism was -no religion, and that external rites did not win Jehovah's approval. -He had told them how foolish it was to put trust in the shadow of -Egypt, and had not shrunk from revealing the fearful consequences -which should follow the setting up of their own false wisdom against -the wisdom of Jehovah. Yet, intermingled with pictures of suffering, -and threats of a harvestless year, designed to punish the vanity and -display of their women, and the intimation--never actually -fulfilled--that even the palace and Temple should become "the joy of -wild asses, a pasture of flocks," he constantly implies that the -disaster would be followed by a mysterious, divine, complete -deliverance, and ultimately by a Messianic reign of joy and peace. -Night is at hand, he said, and darkness; but after the darkness will -come a brighter dawn. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[535] One legend of his birth resembles the finding of Moses in the -bulrushes. - -[536] Schrader, _K. A. T._, pp. 272-274; _Records of the Past_, vii. 28. - -[537] Smith, _Eponym Canon_, p. 130. - -[538] See Prof. Smith, _Isaiah_, p. 198. - -[539] _Records of the Past_, vii. 40. Sargon's words are, "The people -of Philistia, Judah, Edom, and Moab were speaking treason. The people -and their evil chiefs, to fight against me, unto _Pharaoh, the King of -Egypt, a monarch who could not save them_, their presents carried, and -besought his alliance" (G. Smith, _Assyrian Discoveries_, 290). - -[540] On the monuments called _Turtanu_, "Holder of power." See -Schrader in Riehm, _s.v._ - -[541] Raphia, or Ropeh, is on the borders of the desert. Asia beat -Africa in every encounter--at Raphia, at Altaqu, at Carchemish. The -impression of the seal of Shabak, attached to his capitulations with -Sargon, was found at Nineveh by Sir A. H. Layard, and is now in the -British Museum. Shabak died in 712. His son Shabatoh succeeded him in -Egypt, and his nephew(?) Tirhakah in Ethiopia. Sabaco's name assumes -many forms (LXX., [Greek: Segor]; Herod., ii. 137; [Greek: Sabakos]; -Vulg., _Sua_). The Egyptians called him Shaba(ka). - -[542] Isa. xx. 1-6. - -[543] Lenormant, _Les Premieres Civilisations_, ii. 203; _Records of -the Past_, vii. 41-46. - -[544] Isa. xxi. 6, A.V., "Watch in the watch-tower." Hitzig, Cheyne, -"They spread the carpets." Much in this short oracle (xxi. 1-10) is -obscure. Isaiah seems, in denouncing the fate of Babylon, to mourn for -the ruin of the smaller states of which it was the prelude (G. Smith, -_Soc. of Bibl. Arch._, ii. 320 Kleinert, _Stud. u. Krit._, 1877 W. R. -Smith in _Enc. Brit._, _s.v._ "Isaiah"). - -[545] Isa. xxi. 10--_i.e._, "My people threshed and trodden"; LXX., -[Greek: ho kataleleimmenos kai hoi odynomenoi] _Records of the Past_, -vii. 47. - -[546] Herod., [Greek: Sanacharibos]; Jos., [Greek: Senacheribos]. See -Appendix I. Sin was the moon-god; Merodach, the planet Jupiter; Adar, -Saturn; Ishtai, Venus; Nebo, Mercury; Nergal, Mars (Schrader, ii. 117). - -[547] Sargon seems to have been murdered in the palace of unparalleled -splendour which he built at Dur-Sharrukin ("The City of Sargon"). It -took him five years to build it with armies of workmen. Its halls, -opened by Botta, were the first Assyrian halls ever entered by a -modern's foot. It is strange that this greatest of Assyrian kings is -only mentioned once in the Bible (Isa. xx. 1). We owe to Assyriology -his restoration to his proper place in the annals of mankind. See -Ragozin, _Assyria_, 247-254. - -[548] Rawlinson, _Ancient Monarchies_, ii. 178. - -[549] Canon Rawlinson, _Kings of Israel and Judah_, 187. - -[550] On his own monuments this campaign, except its final catastrophe, -is narrated in four sections: (1) The subjugation of Phoenicia, and of -Philistine towns; (2) the conquest of King Zidka of Askelon; (3) the -defeat of Ekron, the restoration of their vassal king Padi to his -throne, and the defeat of Egypt at Altaqu; (4) the expedition against -Jerusalem (Schrader, E. Tr., i. 298). See Appendix I. - -[551] This allusion is said to be the only instance of humour--"_grim_ -humour, or it would not be Assyrian"--which occurs in the Assyrian -annals. - -[552] Schrader, pp. 234-279. The account of the memorable campaign is -narrated in duplicate on the Taylor Cylinder in the British Museum, -and on the Bull Inscription at Kouyunjik. - -[553] Sennacherib calls Tirhakah's army "a host that no man could -number"; but it was defeated by the better discipline, the heavier -armour, and the superior physical strength of the Assyrians. - -[554] See Josh. xix. 43. - -[555] This very phrase "I imposed on them" is found on Sennacherib's -monument (Schrader, ii. 1). The references, when not otherwise -specified, are to Whitehouse's English translation. - -[556] In 2 Kings xviii. 16 the word "pillars" or "doorposts" is -uncertain. LXX., [Greek: esterigmena]; Vulg., _laminas auri_. - -[557] 2 Chron. xxxii. 9. He had to besiege it "with all his power." He -seems to have thought it even more important than Jerusalem, for he -superintended the siege in person (Layard, _Nineveh and Babylon_, 150; -_Monuments of Nineveh_, 2nd series, pl. 21). The ruined Tel of -Umm-el-Lakis lies between the Wady Simsim and the Wady-el-Ahsy (Riehm). - -[558] See 2 Chron. xi. 9, xxv. 27; Jer. xxxiv. 7. The allusion to this -city in Micah (i. 13) is obscure: "O thou inhabitant of Lachish [swift -steed], bind the chariot to the swift steed: she is the beginning of -sin to the daughter of Zion: for the transgressions of Israel were -found in thee." This seems to imply that some form of idolatry had -come from Israel to Lachish, and from Lachish to Jerusalem. In -Sennacherib's picture of the city, foreign worship is represented as -going on in it (Layard, _Monuments of Nineveh_, Pls. 21 and 24; -Rawlinson, _Herodotus_, i. 477). - -[559] Isa. xxix., xxx., xxxi. - - - - - CHAPTER XXVIII - - _THE GREAT DELIVERANCE_ - - B.C. 701 - - 2 _Kings_ xix. 1-37 - - "There brake He the lightnings of the bow, the shield, the sword, - and the battle."--PSALM lxxvi. 3. - - "[Greek: ode pros ton Assurion.]"--LXX. - - "And the might of the Gentile, unsmote by the sword, - Hath melted like snow at the glance of the Lord." - BYRON. - - "Vuolsi cosi cola dove si puote - Cio che si vuole: e piu non dimandare." - DANTE. - - "Through love, through hope, through faith's transcendent dower, - We feel that we are greater than we know." - WORDSWORTH. - - "God shall help her, and that when the morning dawns."--PSALM - xlvi. 5. - - -In spite of the humble submission of Hezekiah, it is a surprise to learn -from Isaiah that Sennacherib--after he had accepted the huge fine and -fixed the tribute, and departed to subdue Lachish--broke his -covenant.[560] He sent his three chief officers--the Turtan, or -commander-in-chief, whose name seems to have been Belemurani;[561] the -Rabsaris, or chief eunuch;[562] and the Rabshakeh, or chief -captain[563]--from Lachish to Hezekiah, with a command of absolute, -unconditional surrender, to be followed by deportation. By this conduct -Sennacherib violated his own boast that he was "a keeper of treaties." -Yet it is not difficult to conjecture the reason for his change of plan. -He had found it no easy matter to subdue even the very minor fortress of -Lachish; how unwise, then, would it be for him to leave in his rear an -uncaptured city so well fortified as Jerusalem! He was advancing towards -Egypt. It was obviously a strategic error to spare on his route a -hostile and almost impregnable stronghold as a nucleus for the plans of -his enemies. Moreover, he had heard rumours that Tirhakah, the third and -last Ethiopian king of Egypt, was advancing against him, and it was most -important to prevent any junction between his forces and those of -Hezekiah.[564] He could not come in person to Jerusalem, for the siege -of Lachish was on his hands; but he detached from his army a large -contingent under his Turtan, to win the Jews by seductive promises, or -to subdue Jerusalem by force. Once more, therefore, the Holy City saw -beneath her often-captured walls the vast beleaguering host, and -"governors and rulers clothed most gorgeously, horsemen riding upon -horses, all of them desirable young men." Isaiah describes to us how the -people crowded to the house-tops, half dead with fear, weeping and -despairing, and crying to the hills to cover them, and bereft of their -rulers, who had been bound by the archers of the enemy in their attempt -to escape. They gazed on the quiver-bearing warriors of Elam in their -chariots, and the serried ranks of the shields of Kir, and the cavalry -round the gates. And he tells us how, as so often occurs at moments of -mad hopelessness, many who ought to have been crying to God in sackcloth -and ashes, gave themselves up, on the contrary, to riot and revelry, -eating flesh, and drinking wine, and saying: "Let us eat and drink; for -to-morrow we die."[565] The king alone had shown patience, calmness, and -active foresight; and he alone, by his energy and faith, had restored -some confidence to the spirits of his fainting people. - -Although the city had been refortified by the king, and supplied with -water, the hearts of the inhabitants must have sunk within them when -they saw the Assyrian army investing the walls, and when the three -commissioners--taking their station "by the conduit of the upper pool -which is in the highway of the fuller's field"--summoned the king to -hear the ultimatum of Sennacherib. - -The king did not in person obey the summons; but he, too, sent out his -three chief officers. They were Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah, who, as -the chamberlain (_al-hab-baith_), was a great prince (_nagid_); -Shebna, who had been degraded, perhaps at the instance of Isaiah, from -the higher post, and was now secretary (_sopher_); and Joah, son of -Asaph, the chronicler (_mazkir_), to whom we probably owe the minute -report of the memorable scene. No doubt they went forth in the pomp of -office--Eliakim with his robe, and girdle, and key.[566] The -Rabshakeh proved himself, indeed, "an affluent orator," and evinced -such familiarity with the religious politics of Judah and Jerusalem, -that this, in conjunction with his perfect mastery of Hebrew, gives -colour to the belief that he was an apostate Jew. He began by -challenging the idle confidence of Hezekiah, and his vain words[567] -that he had counsel and strength for the war. Upon what did he rely? -On the broken and dangerous bulrush of Egypt?[568] It would but pierce -his hand! On Jehovah? But Hezekiah had forfeited his protection by -sweeping away His _bamoth_ and His altars! Why, let Hezekiah make a -wager;[569] and if Sennacherib furnished him with two thousand horses, -he would be unable to find riders for them! How, then, could he drive -back even the lowest of the Assyrian captains? And was not Jehovah on -their side? It was He who had bidden them destroy Jerusalem! - -That last bold assertion, appealing as it did to all that was -erroneous and abject in the minds of the superstitious, and backed, as -it was, by the undeniable force of the envoy's argument, smote so -bitterly on the ear of Hezekiah's courtiers, that they feared it would -render negotiation impossible. They humbly entreated the orator to -speak to "his servants" in the Aramaic language of Assyria, which they -understood,[570] and not in Hebrew, which was the language of all the -Jews who stood in crowds on the walls. Surely this was a diplomatic -embassy to their king, not an incitement to popular sedition? - -The answer of the Rabshakeh was truly Assyrian in its utterly brutal -and ruthless coarseness. Taking up his position directly in front of -the wall,[571] and ostentatiously addressing the multitude, he ignored -the representatives of Hezekiah. Who were they? asked he. His master -had not sent him to speak to them, or to their poor little puppet of a -king, but to the people on the wall, the foul garbage of whose -sufferings of thirst and famine they should share.[572] And to all the -multitude the great king's[573] message was:--Do not be deceived. -Hezekiah cannot save you. Jehovah will not save you. Come to terms -with me, and give me hostages and pledges and a present, and then live -in happy peace and plenty until I come and deport you to a land as -fair and fruitful as this. How should Jehovah deliver them? Had any of -the gods of the nations delivered them out of the hands of the King of -Assyria? "Where are the gods of Hamath, and of Arpad? Where are the -gods of Sepharvaim, Hena, and Ivvah? Have the gods of Samaria -delivered Samaria out of my hand, that Jehovah should deliver -Jerusalem out of my hand?"[574] - -It was a very powerful oration, but the orator must have been a little -disconcerted to find that it was listened to in absolute silence. He -had disgracefully violated the comity of international intercourse by -appealing to subjects against their lawful king; yet from the starving -people there came not a murmur of reply. Faithful to the behest of -their king in the midst of their misery and terror, they answered not -a word. Agamemnon is silent before the coarse jeers of Thersites. "The -sulphurous flash dies in its own smoke, only leaving a hateful stench -behind it!" And in this attitude of the people there was something -very sublime and very instructive. Dumb, stricken, starving, the -wretched Jews did not answer the envoy's taunts or menaces, because -they would not. They were not even in those extremities to be seduced -from their allegiance to the king whom they honoured, though the -speaker had contemptuously ignored his existence. And though the -Rabshakeh had cut them to the heart with his specious appeals and -braggart vaunts, yet "this clever, self-confident, persuasive -personage, with two languages on his tongue, and an army at his back," -could not shake the confidence in God, which, however unreasonable it -might seem, had been elevated into a conviction by their king and -their prophet. The Rabsak had tried to seduce the people into -rebellion, but he had failed.[575] They were ready to die for Hezekiah -with the fidelity of despair. The mirage of sensual comfort in exiled -servitude should not tempt them from the scorched wilderness from -which they could still cry out for the living God. - -Yet the Assyrian's words had struck home into the hearts of his -greatest hearers, and therefore how much more into those of the -ignorant multitudes! Eliakim and Shebna and Joah came to Hezekiah -with their clothes rent, and told him the words of the Rabshakeh. And -when the king heard it, when he found that even his submission had -been utterly in vain, he too rent his clothes, and put on -sackcloth,[576] and went into the only place where he could hope to -find comfort, even into the house of the Lord, which he had cleansed -and restored to beauty, although afterwards he had been driven to -despoil it. Needing an earthly counsellor, he sent Eliakim and Shebna -and the elders of the priests to Isaiah. They were to tell him the -outcome of this day of trouble, rebuke, and contumely; and since the -Rabshakeh had insulted and despised Jehovah, they were to urge the -prophet to make his appeal to Him, and to pray for the remnant which -the Assyrians had left.[577] - -The answer of Isaiah was a dauntless defiance. If others were in -despair, he was not in the least dismayed. "Be not afraid"--such was -his message--"of the mere words with which the boastful boys of the -King of Assyria have blasphemed Me.[578] Behold, I will put a spirit -in him, and he shall hear a rumour,[579] and shall return to his own -land; and I will cause him to fall by the sword in his own land." - -Much crestfallen at the total and unexpected failure of the embassy, and -of his own heart-shaking appeals, the Rabshakeh returned. But meanwhile -Sennacherib had taken Lachish, and marched to Libnah (Tel-es-Safia), -which he was now besieging.[580] There it was that he heard the "rumour" -of which Isaiah had spoken--the report, namely, that Tirhakah, the third -king of the Ethiopian dynasty of Pharaohs,[581] was advancing in person -to meet him. This was B.C. 701, and it is perhaps only by anticipation -that Tirhakah is called "King" of Ethiopia. He was only the general and -representative of his father Shabatok, if (as some think) he did not -succeed to the throne till 698. - -It was impossible for Sennacherib under these circumstances to return -northwards to Jerusalem, of which the siege would inevitably occupy -some time. But he sent a menacing letter,[582] reminding Hezekiah that -neither king nor god had ever yet saved any city from the hands of the -Assyrian destroyers. Where were the kings, he asked again, of Hamath, -Arpad, Sepharvaim, Hena, Ivvah? What had the gods of Gozan, Haran, -Rezeph, and the children of Eden in Telassar done to save their -countries from Sennacherib's ancestors, when they had laid them under -the ban?[583] - -Again the pious king found comfort in God's Temple. Taking with him the -scornful and blasphemous letter, he spread it out before Jehovah in the -Temple with childlike simplicity, that Jehovah might read its insults -and be moved by this dumb appeal.[584] Then both he and Isaiah cried -mightily to God, "who sitteth above the cherubim," admitting the truth -of what Sennacherib had said, and that the kings of Assyria had -destroyed the nations, and burnt their vain gods in the fire. But of -what significance was that? Those were but gods of wood and stone, the -works of men's hands.[585] But Jehovah was the One, the True, the Living -God. Would He not manifest among the nations His eternal supremacy? - -And as the king prayed the word of Jehovah came to Isaiah, and he sent -to Hezekiah this glorious message about Sennacherib:-- - -"The virgin, the daughter of Zion, hath despised thee, and laughed thee -to scorn. The daughter of Jerusalem hath shaken her head at thee."[586] - -The blasphemies, the vaunts, the menacing self-confidence of -Sennacherib, were his surest condemnation. Did he count God a cypher? -It was to God alone that he owed the fearful power which had made the -nations like grass upon the housetops, like blasted corn, before him. -And because God knew his rage and tumult, God would treat him as -Sargon his father had treated conquered kings:-- - -"I will put My hook in thy nose, and My bridle in thy lips.[587] And I -will turn thee back by the way by which thou camest." He had thought -to conquer Egypt:[588] instead of that he should be driven back in -confusion to Assyria. - -It was but a plainer enunciation of the truths which Isaiah had again -and again intimated in enigma and parable. It was the fearless -security of Judah's lion; the safety of the rock amid the deluge; the -safety of the poor brood under the wings of the Divine protection from -"the great Birds'-nester of the world"; the crashing downfall of the -lopped Lebanonian cedar, while the green shoot and tender branch out -of the withered stump of Jesse should take root downward and bear -fruit upward.[589] - -And the sign was given to Hezekiah that this should be so.[590] This -year there should be no harvest, except such as was spontaneous; for -in the stress of Assyrian invasion sowing and reaping had been -impossible. The next year the harvest should only be from this -accidental produce. But in the third year, secure at last, they should -sow and reap, and plant vineyards and eat the fruit thereof.[591] And -though but a remnant of the people was left out of the recent -captivity, they should grow and flourish, and Jerusalem should see the -besieging host of Assyria no more for ever; for Jehovah would defend -the city for His own sake, and for His servant David's sake. - -Thereafter occurred the great deliverance.[592] In some way--we know -not and never shall know how--by a blast of the simoom, or sudden -outburst of plague, or furious panic, or sudden assault, or by some -other calamity,[593] the host of Assyria was smitten in the camp, and -one hundred and eighty-five thousand, including their chief leaders, -perished. The historian, in a manner habitual to pious Semitic -writers, attributes the devastation to the direct action of the "angel -of the Lord";[594] but as Dr. Johnson said long ago, "We are certainly -not to suppose that the angel went about with a sword in his hand, -striking them one by one, but that some powerful natural agent was -employed."[595] - -The Forty-Sixth Psalm is generally regarded as the _Te Deum_ sung in -the Temple over this deliverance, and its opening words, "God is our -refuge and strength," are inscribed over the cathedral of St. Sophia -at Constantinople. - -It is usually supposed that this overwhelming disaster happened to the -host of Assyria _before Jerusalem_. This, however, is not stated; and -as the capture of Lachish was an urgent necessity, it is probable that -the Turtan led back the forces which had accompanied him, and took -them afterwards to Libnah.[596] Yet, since Libnah was but ten miles -from Jerusalem, the Jews could not feel safe for a day until the -mighty news came that the - - "Angel of God spread his wings on the blast, - And breathed in the face of the foe as he passed, - And the eyes of the sleepers waxed heavy and chill, - And their breasts but once heaved, and for ever grew still." - -When the catastrophe which had happened to the main army and the flight -of Sennacherib became known, the scattered forces would melt away. - -All the Assyrians who escaped were now hurrying back[597] to Nineveh -with their foiled king. Sennacherib seems to have occupied himself in -the north, except so far as he was forced to fight fiercely against -his own rebel subjects. He never recovered this complete humiliation. -He never again came southwards. He survived the catastrophe for -seventeen or twenty years,[598] and fought five or six campaigns; but -at the end of that period, while he was worshipping in the house of -Nisroch or Assarac (Assur), his god,[599] he was murdered by his two -sons Adrammelech (Adar-malik--"Adar is king") and Sharezer -(Nergal-sarussar--"Nergal protect the king"),[600] who envied him his -throne. They escaped into the land of Ararat, but were defeated and -killed by their younger brother Esarhaddon (Assur-akh-iddin--"Assur -bestowed a 'brother'") at the battle of Hani-Rabbat, on the Upper -Euphrates. He succeeded Sennacherib, and ultimately avenged on Egypt -his father's overwhelming disaster. He is perhaps the "cruel lord" of -Isa. xix. 4, and it is not unnatural that he should have prevailed -against his parricidal brothers, for we are told that in a previous -battle at Melitene he had shown such prowess that the troops then and -there proclaimed him King of Assyria with shouts of "This is our -king."[601] He reigned from B.C. 681-668, and in his reign Assyria -culminated before her last decline.[602] He was the builder of the -temple at Nimrud, and erected thirty other temples. Babylon and -Nineveh were both his capitals,[603] and he had previously been -viceroy of the former. - -The glorious deliverance in which the faith and courage of the King of -Judah had had their share naturally increased the prosperity and -prestige of Hezekiah, and lifted the authority of Isaiah to an -unprecedented height. Hezekiah probably did not long survive the -uplifting of this dark cloud, but during the remainder of his life "he -was magnified in the sight of all nations."[604] When he died, all -Judah and Jerusalem did him honour, and gave him a splendid burial. -Apparently the old tombs of the kings--the catacomb constructed by -David and Solomon--had in the course of two and a half centuries -become full, so that he had to be buried "in the ascent of the -sepulchres," perhaps some niche higher than the other graves of the -catacomb, which was henceforth disused for the burial of the kings of -Judah. We have had occasion to observe the many particulars in which -his reign was memorable, and to his other services must be added the -literary activity to which we owe the collection and editing, by his -scribes, of the Proverbs of Solomon. His reign had practically -witnessed the institution of the faithful Jewish Church under the -influence of his great prophetic guide.[605] - -The question whether the portent of the destruction of the Assyrian -was identical with that related by Herodotus has never been finally -answered. Herodotus places the scene of the disaster at Pelusium,[606] -and tells this story:--Sennacherib, King of the Arabs and Assyrians, -invaded Egypt. Its king, Sethos, of the Tanite dynasty, in despair -entered the temple of his god Pthah (or Vulcan), and wept.[607] The -god appeared to him with promises of deliverance, and Sethos marched -to meet Sennacherib with an army of poor artisans, since he was a -priest, and the caste of warriors was ill-affected to him. In the -night the god Pthah sent hosts of field-mice, which gnawed the -quivers, bow-strings, and shield-straps of the Assyrians, who -consequently fled, and were massacred. An image of the priest-king -with a mouse in his hand stood in the temple of Pthah, and on its -pedestal the inscription, which might also point the moral of the -Biblical narrative, [Greek: Es eme tis horeon eusebes esto] ("Let him -who looks on me be pious"). Josephus seems so far to accept this -version that he refers to Herodotus, and says that Sennacherib's -failure was the result of a frustration in Egypt.[608] The _mouse_ in -the hand of the statue probably originated the details of the legend; -but according to Horapollion it was the hieroglyphic sign of -destruction by plague.[609] Baehr says that it was also the symbol of -Mars. Readers of Homer will remember the title Apollo _Smintheus_ -("the destroyer of mice"), and the story that mice were worshipped in -the Troas because they gnawed the bow-strings of the enemy. - -But whatever may have been the mode of the retribution, or the scene in -which it took place, it is certainly historical. The outlines of the -narrative in the sacred historian are identical with those in the -Assyrian records. The annals of Sennacherib tell us the four initial -stages of the great campaign in the conquest of Phoenicia, of Askelon, -and of Ekron, the defeat of the Egyptians at Altaqu, and the earlier -hostilities against Hezekiah. The Book of Kings concentrates our -attention on the details of the close of the invasion. On this point, -whether from accident, or because Sennacherib did not choose to register -his own calamity, and the frustration of the gods of whose protection he -boasted, the Assyrian records are silent. Baffled conquerors rarely -dwell on their own disasters. It is not in the despatches of Napoleon -that we shall find the true story of his abandonment of Syria, of the -defeats of his forces in Spain, or of his retreat from Moscow.[610] - -The great lesson of the whole story is the reward and the triumph of -indomitable faith. Faith may still burn with a steady flame when the -difficulties around it seem insuperable, when all refutation of the -attacks of its enemies seems to be impossible, when Hope itself has -sunk into white ashes in which scarcely a gleam of heat remains. -Isaiah had nothing to rely upon; he had no argument wherewith to -furnish Hezekiah beyond the bare and apparently unmeaning promise, -"Jehovah is our Judge; Jehovah is our Lawgiver; Jehovah is our King. -He will save us." It was a magnificent vindication of his inspired -conviction, when all turned out--not indeed in minute details, but in -every essential fact--exactly as he had prophesied from the first. -Even in B.C. 740 he had declared that the sins of Judah deserved and -would receive condign punishment, though a remnant should be -saved.[611] That the retribution would come from some foreign -enemy--Assyria or Egypt, or both--he felt sure. Jehovah would hiss for -the fly in the uttermost canals of Egypt, and for the bee that is in -the land of Assyria, and both should swarm in the crevices of the -rocks, and over the pastures.[612] Later on in 732, in the reign of -Ahaz, he pointed to Assyria,[613] as the destined scourge, and he -realised this still more clearly in 725 and 721, when Shalmaneser and -Sargon were tearing Samaria to pieces.[614] Contrary, indeed, to his -expectation, the Assyrians did not then destroy Jerusalem, or even -formally besiege it. The revolt from Assyria, the reliance on Egypt, -did not for a moment blind his judgment or alter his conviction; and -in 701 it came true when Sennacherib was on the march for -Palestine.[615] Yet he never wavered in the apparently impossible -conclusion, that, in spite of all, in spite even of his own darker -prophecies (xxxii. 14), Jerusalem shall in some Divine manner be -saved.[616] The deliverance would be, as he declared from first to -last, the work of Jehovah, not the work of man,[617] and because of it -Sennacherib would return to his own land and perish there.[618] The -details might be dim and wavering; the result was certain. Isaiah was -no thaumaturge, no peeping wizard, no muttering necromancer, no -monthly prognosticator.[619] He was a prophet--that is, an inspired -moral and spiritual teacher who was able to foresee and to foretell, -not in their details, but in their broad outlines, the events yet -future, because he was enabled to read them by the eye of faith ere -they had yet occurred. His faith convinced him that predictions -founded on eternal principles have all the certainty of a law, and -that God's dealings with men and nations in the future can be seen in -the light of experience derived from the history of the past. Courage, -zeal, unquenchable hope, indomitable resolution, spring from that -perfect confidence in God which is the natural reward of innocence and -faithfulness. Isaiah trusted in God, and he knew that they who put -their trust in Him can never be confounded. - -No event produced a deeper impression on the minds of the Jews, though -that impression was soon afterwards, for a time, obliterated. -Naturally, it elevated the authority of Isaiah into unquestioned -pre-eminence during the reign of Hezekiah. It has left its echo, not -only in his own triumphant paeans, but also in the Forty-Sixth Psalm, -which the Septuagint calls "An ode to the Assyrian," and perhaps also -in the Seventy-Fifth and Seventy-Sixth Psalms. In the minds of all -faithful Israelites it established for ever the conviction that God -had chosen Judah for Himself, and Israel for His own possession; that -God was in the midst of Zion, and she should not be confounded: "God -shall help her, and that right early." And it contains a noble and -inspiring lesson for all time. "It is not without reason," says Dean -Stanley, "that in the Churches of Moscow the exultation over the fall -of Sennacherib is still read on the anniversary of the retreat of the -French from Russia, or that Arnold, in his lectures on Modern History, -in the impressive passage in which he dwells on that great -catastrophe, declared that for the memorable night of the frost in -which twenty thousand horses perished, and the strength of the French -army was utterly broken, he knew of no language so well fitted to -describe it as the words in which Isaiah described the advance and -destruction of the hosts of Sennacherib."[620] - -They had been brought face to face, the two kings--Sennacherib and -Hezekiah. One was the impious boaster who relied on his own strength, -and on the mighty host which dried up rivers with their trampling -march--the worldling who thought to lord it over the affrighted globe; -the other was the poor kinglet of the Chosen People, with his one city -and his enfeebled people, and his dominion not so large as one of the -smallest English counties. But "one with God is irresistible," "one -with God is always in a majority." The poor, weak prince triumphs over -the terrific conqueror, because he trusts in Him to whom -world-desolating tyrants are but as the small dust of the balance, -and who "taketh up the isles as a very little thing."[621] - -As Assyria now vanishes almost entirely from the history of the Chosen -People, we may here recall with delight one large and loving prophecy, -to show that the Hebrews were sometimes uplifted by the power of -inspiration above the narrowness of a bigoted and exclusive spirit. -Desperately as Israel had suffered, both from Egypt and Assyria, Isaiah -could still utter the glowing Messianic Prophecy which included the -Gentiles in the privileges of the Golden Age to come. He foretold that-- - -"In that day shall Israel be the third with Egypt and Assyria, as a -blessing in the midst of the land: whom the Lord of hosts shall bless, -saying, Blessed be Egypt My people, and Assyria the work of My hands, -and Israel Mine inheritance."[622] - - "That strain I heard was of a higher mood!" - - * * * * * - -King Hezekiah can have no finer panegyric than that of the son of -Sirach: "Even the kings of Judah failed, for they forsook the law of -the Most High: all except David, and Ezekias, and Josias failed."[623] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[560] Isa. xxxiii. 8. - -[561] Isa. xx. 1. - -[562] Jer. xxxix. 3. The meaning of the name is not certain. _Saris_, -in Hebrew, is "eunuch"; but the word is not known in Assyrian records, -and we should expect _Rabsarisim_, as in Dan. i. 3. - -[563] Rabsak perhaps means _chief officer_ or vizier, and is Hebraised -into Rabshakeh. Prof. G. A. Smith (_Isaiah_, p. 345) calls him -"Sennacherib's Bismarck." Rabshakeh, usually rendered "chief cupbearer," -is an Aramaised form of Rabsak (great chief); but we know of no chief -cupbearer at the Assyrian court (Schrader, _K. A. T._, 199 f.). - -[564] From an Apis-stele he seems to have reigned twenty-six years -(B.C. 694-668?). - -[565] Isa. xxii. 1-13. - -[566] Eliakim. See Isa. xxii. 21, 22. - -[567] "Vain words"; lit., "a word of the lips." LXX., [Greek: logoi -cheileon]. - -[568] Comp. Isa. xxx. 1-7; Ezek. xxix. 6. It seems to be an -over-refinement to suppose that Sennacherib refers to the divisions -between Egypt and Ethiopia. - -[569] 2 Kings xviii. 23, A.V.: "Let Hezekiah give pledges." - -[570] Heb., _Aramith_. - -[571] 2 Kings xviii. 28, where _stood_ should be rendered _came -forward_. - -[572] The coarse expression is softened down by the Chronicler (2 -Chron. xxxii. 18). - -[573] The kings of Assyria usually called themselves "great king, -mighty king, king of the multitude, king of the land Assur." - -[574] Every one must notice the glaring inconsistency between this -_defiance_ of Jehovah and the previous claim to the possession of His -sanction. On Hamath, Arpad, etc., see Schrader, ii. 7-10. - -[575] Isa. xxxiii. 8: "He hath broken the covenant, he hath despised -the cities, he regardeth no man." - -[576] 1 Kings xx. 32; 2 Kings vi. 30. - -[577] Sennacherib had already carried off vast numbers. See Isa. xxiv. -1-12; Demetrius _ap._ Clem. Alex., _Strom._, i. 403. - -[578] Isaiah's phrase, _na'ari melek_, "lads of the king," is -contemptuous. LXX., [Greek: paidaria]. - -[579] Heb., _ruach_; LXX., [Greek: didomi en auto pneuma]. Theodoret -calls this "spirit" _cowardice_ ([Greek: ten deilian oimai deloun]). - -[580] Libnah means "whiteness." Dean Stanley (_S. and P._, 207, 258) -identifies it with a white-faced hill, the Blanchegarde of the -Crusaders. - -[581] The dates usually given are Sabaco, B.C. 725-712; Shabatok, -712-698; Tirhakah, 698-672. Manetho, [Greek: Tarachos]; Strabo, -[Greek: Terakon, ho Aithiops]. He was third king of the twenty-fifth -dynasty, and the greatest of the Egyptian sovereigns who came from -Ethiopia. He reigned gloriously for many years. We see his figure at -Medinet Abou, smiting ten captive princes with an iron mace; but he -was finally defeated by Esarhaddon, and in 668 by Assurbanipal at -Karbanit (Canopus). He is called by his conqueror "Tar-ku-u, King of -Egypt and Cush" (Schrader, _K. A. T._, 336 ff.). - -[582] Heb., _Sepharim_; Vulg., _litterae_; 2 Chron. xxxii. 17. The more -ordinary term for a letter is _iggereth_. - -[583] 2 Kings xix. 12 (Heb.); Ezek. xxvii. 23. On these places see -Schrader, ii. 11, 12. It had been indeed Sennacherib's work "to reduce -fenced cities to ruinous heaps." He boasts on the Bellino Cylinder, -"Their smaller towns without number I overthrew, and reduced them to -heaps of rubbish" (_Records of the Past_, i. 27). - -[584] "It is a prayer without words, a prayer in action, which then -passes into a spoken prayer" (Delitzsch). - -[585] The Assyrians are sometimes represented in their monuments as -hewing idols to pieces in honour of their god Assur (Botta, _Monum._, -pl. 140). - -[586] LXX., [Greek: kinein ten kephalen], "a gesture of scorn" (Psalm -xxii. 7, cix. 25; Lam. ii. 15). With the vaunts of Sennacherib compare -Claudian, _De bell. Geth._, 526-532. - - "Cum cesserit omnis - Obsequiis natura meis? Subsidere nostris - Sub pedibus montes, _arescere vidimus amnes_ ... - Fregi Alpes, _galeis Padum victricibus hausi_." - KEIL, _ad loc._ - - -[587] Comp. 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11 (Heb.); Psalm xxxix. 1; Isa. xxx. 28; -Ezek. xxxviii. 4, xxix. 4. The Assyrians drove a ring through the -lower lip, the Babylonians through the nose. See Rawlinson, _Ancient -Monarchies_, ii. 314, iii. 436. - -[588] 2 Kings xix. 33. "The river of Egypt" (_Nachal-ha-Mizraim_) is -the Wady-el-Arish. - -[589] Isa. x. 33, 34, xi. 1, xiv. 8; Stanley, _Lectures_, ii. 410. - -[590] [Hebrew: 'ot]. A sign "is a thing, an event, or an action -intended as a pledge of the Divine certainty of another. Sometimes it -is a miracle (Gen. iv. 15, Heb.), or a permanent symbol (Isa. viii. -18, xx. 3, xxxvii. 30; Jer. xliv. 29)" (Delitzsch). - -[591] The first year they should eat _saphiach_ (LXX., [Greek: -automata]; Vulg., _quae repereris_); the second year, _sachish_ (LXX., -[Greek: ta anatellonta]; Vulg., _quae sponte nascuntur_). - -[592] 2 Kings xix. 35: "It came to pass that night." Isaiah only has -"then"; Josephus, [Greek: kata ten proten tes poliorkias nykta]. -Menochius understands it "_in celebri illa nocte_." The LXX. omits -"that," and simply says "in the night" ([Greek: nyktos]). Comp. Psalm -xlvi. 5 (Heb.); Isa. xvii. 14. - -[593] Josephus, followed by many moderns, and even by Keil, suggests a -plague. The malaria of the Pelusiotic marshes easily breeds pestilence. -The "_maleak Jehovah_" is "the destroyer" (_mashchith_) (Exod. xii. 23; -2 Sam. xxiv. 16.) Comp. Justin., xix. 11; Diod. Sic., xix. 434. - -[594] Comp. 2 Sam. xxiv. 15, 16. - -[595] The Babyl. Talmud and some Targums, followed by Vitringa, etc., -attribute to it storms of lightning; Prideaux, Heine, and Faber, to -the simoom; R. Jose, Ussher, etc., to a nocturnal attack of Tirhakah. - -[596] It is, however, perfectly possible that a contingent was left on -guard. "Where is the [past] terror? Where is he that rated the -tribute? Where is he that received it?" (Isa. xxxiii. 18). "At the -noise of the tumult the people flee" (Isa. xxxiii. 3); "At Thy rebuke, -O God of Jacob, both chariot and horse are cast into a dead sleep" -(Psalm lxxvi. 6). Comp. Psalm xlviii. 4-6. - -[597] This is the meaning of "he departed, and went, and returned." - -[598] Not, only fifty-five days, as we read in Tobit i. 21. - -[599] Jos., _Antt._, X. i. 5: "In his own temple to Araske"; LXX., -[Greek: Asarach]; Isa. xxxvii. 38. One guess connects the word with -Nesher, "the eagle-god," often seen on the Assyrian bas-reliefs. -Lenormant calls him "the god of human destiny." - -[600] Alex. Polyhistor _ap._ Euseb., i. 27; Kimchi _ad_ 2 Kings xix. -37. Buxtorf (_Bibl. Rabbinic._) says that Sennacherib entered the -temple to ask his counsellors why Jehovah favoured Israel. Being told -that it was because of Abraham's willingness to offer Isaac, he said, -"Then I will offer my two sons." Rashi adds that they slew him to save -their own lives. (See Schenkel and Riehm, _s.v._ "Sanherib"--both -articles by Schrader). - -[601] See Schrader in Riehm's _Handwoerterbuch_, _s.vv._ "Sanherib," -"Asarhaddon." Esarhaddon, judging from what is called "Sennacherib's -will," in which the king leaves him splendid presents, seems to have -been a favourite of his father (_Records of the Past_, i. 136). He -says that on hearing of his father's murder, "I was wrathful as a -lion, and my soul raged within me, and I lifted my hands to the great -gods to assume the sovereignty of my father's house." See Appendix I. - -[602] The Book of Tobit (i. 21) calls him Sarchedonas. - -[603] 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11. - -[604] 2 Chron. xxxii. 23. - -[605] Wellhausen, p. 116. - -[606] Herod., ii. 14. "Sin" (Tanis?), Ezek. xxx. 15. It lay in the -midst of morasses, and some attribute the catastrophe to the malaria. - -[607] The deliverance is really connected with Tirhakah, whose deeds -are recorded in a temple at Medinet Habou, but the jealousy of the -Memphites attributed it to the piety of Sethos. See G. W. Wilkinson, -_Ancient Egyptians_, i. 141; Rawlinson, _Herodotus_, i. 394. - -[608] _Antt._, X. i. 1-5. - -[609] Comp. 1 Sam. v., vi., where, after a plague, the Philistines -sent an expiation of five golden mice. - -[610] We may add that even the Chronicler drops a veil over -Sennacherib's actual capture of fortresses in Judah ("he _thought_ to -win them for himself," 2 Chron. xxxii. 1: comp. 2 Kings xviii. 13; -Isa. xxxvi. 1). - -[611] Isa. vi. 11-13. - -[612] Isa. v. 26-30. - -[613] Isa. vii. 18. - -[614] Isa. viii., xxviii. 1-15, x. 28-34. - -[615] Isa. xiv. 29-32, xxix., xxx. - -[616] Isa. i. 19, 20. - -[617] Isa. x. 33, xxix. 5-8, xxx. 20-26, 30-33. - -[618] Isa. xxxviii. 6. See for this paragraph an admirable chapter in -Prof. Smith's _Isaiah_, pp. 368-374. - -[619] Isa. xlvii. 13. - -[620] Stanley, _Lectures_, ii. 531. - -[621] Isa. xl. 15. - -[622] Isa. xix. 24, 25. - -[623] Ecclus. xlix. 4. - - - - - CHAPTER XXIX - - _MANASSEH_ - - B.C. 686-641 - - 2 KINGS xxi. 1-16 - - "Shall the throne of wickedness have fellowship with Thee, - That frameth mischief by statute? - They gather themselves in troops against the soul of the righteous, - And condemn the innocent blood."--PSALM xciv. 20, 21. - - "Though the mills of God grind slowly, yet they grind - exceeding small; - Though with patience long He waiteth, with exactness grinds - He all." - - -Manasseh was born after Hezekiah's recovery from his terrible illness. -He was but twelve years old when he began to reign. Of his mother -Hephzibah we know nothing, nor of the Zechariah who was her father; -but perhaps Isaiah in one passage (lxii. 4) may refer to her name, "My -delight is in her."[624] The son of Hezekiah and Hephzibah was the -worst of all the kings of Judah, and had the longest reign. - -The tender age of Manasseh when he came to the throne may perhaps -account for the fact that the "forgetfulness" which his name -implied[625] was not a forgetting of other sorrows, but of all that -was noble and righteous in the attempted reformation which had been -the main religious work of his father's life. In Judah, as in England, -a king was not supposed to be of age until he was eighteen.[626] For -six years Manasseh must have been to a great extent under the -influence of his regents and counsellors. - -There always existed in Jerusalem, even in the best times, a -heathenising party, and it was, unfortunately, composed of princes and -aristocrats who could bring strong influence to bear upon the -king.[627] They did not deny Jehovah, but they did not recognise Him -as the sole or the supreme God of heaven and earth. To them He was the -local deity of Israel and Judah. But there were other gods, the gods -of the nations, and their aim always was to recognise the existence of -these deities and to pay homage to their power. If their favour could -not be purchased except by their immediate votaries, at least their -anger might be averted. These politicians advocated a fatal and -incongruous syncretism, or at least an unlimited tolerance for heathen -idols, for which they could, unhappily, quote the precepts and example -of the Wise King, Solomon. If any one questioned their views as a -dangerous idolatry, and an insult to - - "Jehovah thundering out of Zion, throned - Between the cherubim," - -they had but to point from the walls of Jerusalem to the confronting -summit of Olivet, where still remained the shrines which the son of -David had erected three centuries earlier to Chemosh, and Milcom, and -Ashtoreth, who, since his day, had always found, even in Jerusalem, -some worshippers, open or secret, to acknowledge their divinity. - -And these worldlings, in their tolerance for the intolerable, could -always appeal to two powerful instincts of man's fallen -nature--sensuality and fear--"lust hard by hate." There was something -in the worship of Baal-Peor and of Moloch which appealed to the -undying ape and tiger in the unregenerate human heart. - -The true worship of Jehovah is exactly that form of religion which man -finds it least easy to render to Him--the religion of pure morality. -Services, rites, functions, look like religious diligence, and readily -secure a reverent outward devotion. Even self-maceration, fasts, and -flagellation are a cheap way of escaping the "endless torments" which -always loom so hugely in terrifying superstition. - -Such superstitions are children of the fear and faithlessness which hath -torment. They are the corruptions with which every form of false -religion, and with which also a corrupt and perverted Christianity, are -always tainted. And they demand the easy expiation of physical ritual. -But all the best and most spiritual teachers of Scripture--alike the -Hebrew Prophets and the Christian Apostles--are at one with the Lord -Christ in perpetual insistence on the truth that "mercy is better than -sacrifice," and that true religion consists in that good mind and good -life which are the sole proof of genuine sincerity. - -If Jehovah would but be contented with gifts, men would gladly offer -Him thousands of rams and tens of thousands of rivers of oil. But the -prophets taught that He was above all mean bribes, and that such -offerings never could be anything to One whose were all the beasts of -the forests and the cattle upon a thousand hills. It was not easy, -then, to bribe such a God, or to make Him a respecter of persons. - -How easy, again, would it be, if He would even accept human -sacrifices! A child was but a child. How easy to kill a child, and -place it in the brazen arms which sloped over the fiery cistern! -Moloch and Chemosh were supremely to be won by such holocausts; and -surely Moloch and Chemosh must be lords of power! But here again the -prophets of Jehovah stepped in, and said that it was of no avail with -the High, the Holy, the Merciful, to give even our firstborn for our -transgressions, or the fruit of the body for the sin of the soul. - -Asceticism, then--occasional fasting, severe self-deprivations--surely -the gods would accept these? And they were as nothing compared to the -burden of sin and the agony of conscience! Baal and Asherah could -command agonised devotees, and could approve of them. By Jehovah and -His prophets such bodily service is discouraged and forbidden. - -Pleasure, then?--the consecration of the natural impulses, the -devotion in religious cultus of the passions and appetites of the -flesh--why should that be so abhorrent to Jehovah? Other deities -exulted in licentiousness. Was not the temple of Astarte full of her -women-worshippers and of her eunuchs? Was there no fascination in the -voluptuous allurements, the orgiastic dances, the stolen waters, the -bread eaten in secret, when not only was the conscience lulled by the -removal therefrom of all sense of guilt and degradation, but such -orgies were even crowned with merit, as part of an acceptable worship? -After all, there was "a fascination of corruption" in these idols of -gold and jewels, of lust and blood! - -How stern, how cold, how bare, by comparison, was the moral law which -only said, "Thou shalt not," and emphasised its prohibition with the -unalterable sanctions, "This do, and thou shalt live"; "Do it not, and -thou shalt die"! What could they make of a religion which was so -eloquently silent as to the meritoriousness of ritual? - -And how chill and simple and dreary was that which--according to -Micah--Jehovah had shown to be good, and which He required of every -man,--which was nothing more than to do justly, and to love mercy, and -to walk humbly with God! - -And what right had the prophets--so asked these apostates--to lord it -over God's heritage in this way? Solomon was the greatest king of -Israel and Judah; and Solomon had never been so exclusive in his -religionism, though he had built the Temple of the Lord; nor Rehoboam; -nor the great Phoenician Queen Athaliah; nor the cultivated and -aesthetic Ahaz; nor, in the kingdom of Israel, the lordly warrior Ahab; -nor the splendid and long-lived victor Jeroboam II. Had not Manasseh -plenty of examples of religious syncretism, to which he might appeal -in the joy of his youthful age? - -Not impossibly there lay in the background another reason why the -young king might be inclined to listen to these evil counsellors. -Micah may still have been living; but of Isaiah we hear no more. -Probably he was dead. It is not recorded that he delivered any -prophecy during the reign of Manasseh, nor is it certain that he -outlived the former king. Tradition, indeed, in later days, asserted -that he had confronted Manasseh, and been doomed to death; that he had -taken refuge in a cedar tree, and in that cedar had been sawn asunder; -but the tradition is wholly without a vestige of authority. One of -Micah's sternest oracles was perhaps uttered in the days of -Manasseh.[628] But Micah was only a provincial prophet of -Moresheth-Gath. He never moved in the midst of princes as Isaiah had -done, or possessed a tithe of the authority which had rested for so -many years on the shoulders of his mighty contemporary. - -Moreover--so the heathen party might suggest--had not Isaiah's -prophecies been falsified by the result? Had he not distinctly -promised and pledged his credit to two things? and had not both turned -out to be unworthy of reliance? - -i. Surely he had prophesied the utter downfall of the Assyrians. And it -was true that after his disaster on the confines of Egypt, Sennacherib -had fled in haste to Nineveh, and his occupations with rebels on his own -frontiers had left Judah unmolested, and he had been murdered by his -sons. But, on the other hand, in no sense of the word had Assyria -fallen. On the contrary, she had never been more powerful. Not one of -his predecessors had seemed more irresistible than Esarhaddon. He was -undisputed king of Babylon and of Nineveh. There would be no more -embassies from Merodach-Baladan, or any revolted viceroy! And rumour -would early begin to narrate that Esarhaddon had not forgotten the -catastrophe at Pelusium, but intended to avenge it, and to teach Egypt -the forgotten lessons of Raphia (B.C. 720) and Altaqu (B.C. 701). - -ii. And as for Judah, where was the golden Messianic age which Isaiah -had promised? Where did they see the Divine Prince whom he had -foretold, or the lion lying down with the lamb, and the child laying -his hand on the cockatrice's den? - -All this, they would argue, had greatly shaken Isaiah's prophetic -authority. Judah was a mere vassal--safe only in so far as she -remained a vassal, and did not join Tyre or any other rebellious -power, but abode safe under the shadow of Assyria's mighty wings. - -Was it not, then, as well to look facts in the face? to accept things -as they were? And--so they would argue, with false plausibility--since -the triumph, after all, had remained with the gods of the nations, -might it not be as well to dethrone Jehovah from His exclusive -dominion, and at least to propitiate the potent and less-exacting -deities, the charming _Di faciles_ who smiled at lewd aberrations, and -even flung over them the glamour of devotion? - -With these bolder renegades would be the whole body of the priests of -the _bamoth_. Those old sanctuaries had been repressed by Hezekiah -without any compensation; for in those days life-interests were -little, or not at all, regarded. Multitudes of priests and Levites -must have been flung out of employment and reduced to poverty by the -recent religious revolution. It is not likely that they bore without a -murmur the obliteration of forms of worship sanctioned by immemorial -custom, or that they made no efforts to procure the re-establishment -of what the people loved. - -Thus a vast weight of evil influence was brought to bear upon the -boy-king; and it was also the more powerful because repeated -indications exist that, while the king was nominally a despot, and was -surrounded with external observance, the real control of affairs was, -to a large extent, in the hands of an aristocracy of priests and -princes, except when the king was a man of great personal force. - -Manasseh went over to these retrogressionists heart and soul, and he -contentedly remained a tributary of Assyria. Even when Esarhaddon's -forces marched to the chastisement of Egypt, he felt secure in his -allegiance to the dominant tyrant of Babylon and Nineveh, whose -interest it would be not to disturb a faithful subject. - -There followed a reaction, an absolute rebound from the old -monotheistic strictness and righteousness. The nation emancipated -itself from the moral law as with a shout of relief, and plunged into -superstition and licentiousness. The reign of Manasseh resembled at -once the recrudescence of Popery in the reign of Mary Tudor, with its -rekindling of the fires of Smithfield, and the foul orgies of -debauchery at the Restoration of 1660, when human nature, loving -degraded licence better than strenuous liberty, flung away the noble -freedom of Puritanism for the loathly mysteries of Cotytto. The age of -Manasseh resembled that of Charles II., in the famous description of -Lord Macaulay. "Then came days never to be recalled without a blush, -the days of servitude without loyalty, and sensuality without love, of -dwarfish talents and gigantic vices, the paradise of cold hearts and -narrow minds, the golden age of the coward, the bigot, and the slave. -In every high place worship was paid to Belial and Moloch, and England -propitiated these obscene and cruel idols with the blood of her best -and bravest children." Sensuous intoxication is in all cases closely -connected with fiendish cruelty, and the introducer of voluptuous -idolatries naturally became the first persecutor of the true religion. - -1. The first step of the king, and probably the one which the people -welcomed most, was the restoration of the chapelries under the trees -and on the hills, which, more strenuously than any of his -predecessors, Hezekiah had at least attempted to put down. For this -step Manasseh might have pleaded the sanction of ages to which the -Book of Deuteronomy had either been wholly unknown, or during which -its laws had become as utterly forgotten as though they had never -existed. To many worshippers these old shrines had become extremely -precious. They felt it to be either an actual impossibility, or at the -best intolerably burdensome, to make their way by long, dreary, and -difficult journeys to Jerusalem, when they desired to pay the most -ordinary rites of worship. They knew no reason, and had never known of -any reason, why Jehovah should be worshipped in one Temple only. All -their religious instincts led them the other way. They could point to -the example of all the highly honoured saints who had worshipped God -at Gilgal, Shechem, Bethel, Hebron, Beersheba, Kedesh, Gibeah, and -many another shrine; and of all the saintly kings who had not dreamt -of interfering with such free worship. Why should Jerusalem monopolise -all sanctity? It might be a politic view for kings to maintain, and -highly profitable for priests to establish; but none of their great -prophets, not even the princely Isaiah, had said one syllable against -the innocent high places of Jehovah. In those days there were no -synagogues. The extinction of the high places doubtless seemed to many -of the people an extinction of religion in daily life, and they were -more than half disposed to agree with the Rabshakeh that Jehovah was -offended by what they regarded as a burdensome, unwise, and sweeping -innovation.--If it be necessary to answer arguments which might have -seemed natural, against a custom which might have seemed innocent, it -must suffice to say that it was the chief mission of Israel to keep -alive among the nations of the world the knowledge of the One True -God, and that, amid the constant temptations to accept the gods of the -heathen as they were adored in groves and on high places, the faith of -Israel could no longer be kept pure except by the Deuteronomic -institution of one central and exclusive shrine. - -2. But Manasseh did far worse than rehabilitate the worship at the high -places which his father had discouraged. "He reared up altars for -Baal,[629] and made an Asherah, as did Ahab, King of Israel." This was -the first bad element of the new cosmopolitan eclecticism. It involved -the acceptance of the Phoenician nature-worship with its manifold -abominations. The people had grown familiar with it under Athaliah (2 -Kings xi. 18), and under Ahaz (2 Chron. xxviii. 2); but Manasseh, as we -infer from the account given of Josiah's reformation, had gone further -than either. He had actually ventured to introduce the image of Baal -into the Temple, and to set up the Asherah-pillar in front of it (2 -Kings xxiii. 4). Worse even than this, he had erected in the very -Temple (_id._ 7) houses devoted to the execrable _Qedeshim_ (Vulg., -_effeminati_), in which also the women wove broidered hangings to adorn -the shrines of the idol image, as in the worship of the Assyrian -Mylitta.[630] He, at the same time, displaced the altar and removed the -Ark. To the latter circumstances is perhaps due the Rabbinic legend that -Hezekiah hid the Ark till the coming of the Messiah. - -3. To this Phoenician worship he added Sabaism, the worship of the -stars, "all the host of heaven, whom he served." This was an entirely -new phase of idolatry, unknown to the Hebrews till they came in -contact with Assyria.[631] It came rapidly into vogue, and exercised -over their imaginations the spell of a seductive novelty, as we see -from the strong testimony of the prophet Jeremiah.[632] This is why it -is so emphatically forbidden in the Book of Deuteronomy.[633] The king -built altars to the stars of the Zodiac (_Mazzaroth_), both in the -outer court of the Temple, and in the court of the priests, and on -these altars incense or victims were continually burned. He also -introduced or encouraged the introduction into the Temple precincts of -the horses and chariots dedicated to the sun.[634] - -When we read of the actual invasion of the Temple-precincts in this as -in preceding and subsequent reigns, we cannot but ask, Were these -atrocities committed with the sanction or with the connivance of the -priests? We are not told. Yet how can it have been otherwise? If the -high priest Azariah could muster eighty priests to oppose King Uzziah, -when he merely wished to burn incense in the Temple, as Solomon had -done before him, and as Ahaz did after him--if Jehoiada could, -according to the Chronicler, muster a perfect army of priests and -Levites to dethrone Athaliah, and could so stir up the people that -they rose _en masse_ to tear down the temple of Baal, and slay Mattan, -his high priest,--how was it possible for Manasseh to perpetrate these -flagrant acts of idolatrous apostasy, if the priests were all ranged -in opposition to his power? Was their authority suddenly paralysed? -Did their influence with the people shrivel into nothing when Hezekiah -had been carried to his tomb? Or did these priests follow the easy and -profitable course which they seem to have followed throughout the -whole history of the kings without an exception?--did they simply -answer the kings according to their idols? - -4. Another, and the most hideous, element of the new mixture of cults -was the reintroduction of the ancient Canaanite worship of Moloch with -its human sacrifices. Manasseh, like Ahaz, made his son or, according -to the Chronicler and the Septuagint, "his sons"--pass through the -fire to this grim Ammonite idol in Tophet of the Valley of Hinnom, so -as to leave no chance untried. And herein he was far more inexcusable -than his grandfather; for Ahaz had at least been driven by desperate -extremity to this last expedient, but Manasseh was living, if not in -prosperity, at least in unbroken peace. Moreover, he not only did this -himself, but did his utmost to make a popular institution of -children-sacrifice, so that many practised it in the dreadful valley -and amid the rocks outside Jerusalem.[635] - -5. Even this did not suffice him. To these Assyrian, Phoenician, and -Canaanite elements of idolatry he added Babylonian novelties. He -practised augury, and used enchantments, and he dealt with familiar -spirits and wizards, as though without Egyptian necromancy and -Mesopotamian shamanism his eclectic worship would be incomplete.[636] - -6. Thus "he wrought much wickedness in the sight of the Lord to -provoke Him to anger." He placed a graven image of his Asherah inside -the Temple, and utterly profaned the sacred house, and seduced his -people "to do more evil than did the nations whom the Lord destroyed -before the children of Israel." - -Whatever was the conduct of the priests, the prophets were not silent. -They denounced Manasseh for having done worse than even the ancient -Amorites, and declared that, in consequence of his crimes, God would -bring upon Jerusalem such evil as would cause both the ears of him -that heard it to tingle;[637] that he would stretch over Jerusalem for -ruin the line and the level of Ahab;[638] that He would cast off even -the remnant, and deliver them to their enemies; that He would wipe out -Jerusalem "as a man wipeth a dish, wiping and turning it upside -down."[639] - -The finest oracles of Micah (vi. 1-vii. 7) were probably uttered in the -reign of Manasseh, and give the simplest and purest expression to the -supremacy of morality as the one true end and test of religion. Micah is -as indifferent as the Decalogue to all claims of rites, ceremonies, and -outward worship. "Jehovah demands nothing for Himself; all that He asks -is for man: this is the fundamental law of the theocracy." - -The apostasies of the king and the denunciation of the prophets thus -came into fierce collision, and led naturally to persecution and -bloodshed. Perhaps in Mic. vii. 1-7 we catch the echoes of the Reign -of Terror. The king resorted to violence, using, no doubt, the -tyrant's devilish plea of necessity. He made blood run like water in -the streets of Jerusalem from end to end,[640] and in the exaggerated -phrase of Josephus, was _daily_ slaying the prophets.[641] It was -during this persecution, according to Rabbinic tradition, that Isaiah -received the martyr's crown.[642] - -And no miracles were wrought to save the martyrs. Elijah and Elisha -had been surrounded with a blaze of miracles, but in Judah no prophet -arose who could so wield the power of Heaven. - -At this point the narrative of the historian about Manasseh ends. If -he shared the current opinion of his day, which connected individual -and national prosperity with well-doing, and regarded length of days -as a sign of the favour of Heaven, while, on the other hand, -misfortune and misery invariably resulted from the wrath of Jehovah, -he could not have been otherwise than surprised, and perhaps even -pained, to have to relate that Manasseh reigned fifty-five years. Not -only was his reign longer than that of any other king of Israel or -Judah; not only did he attain a greater age than any of them; but, -further, no calamity seems to have marked his rule. A contented and -protected vassal of Esarhaddon, secure from his attacks, and also -unmolested by the weakened and subjugated nations around him, he would -seem, in the story of the Kings, to have enjoyed an enviable external -lot, and to have presided over a people who were happy, in that, -during his rule, they had no history. But whatever the writer may have -felt, he tells us no more, and lets us see Manasseh sink peacefully -into his grave "in the garden of his own house, in the garden of -Uzza," and leave to his son Amon a peaceful realm and an undisputed -crown. Such a career would undoubtedly perplex and confound all the -preconceived opinions of Jewish orthodoxy. The prosperity of Manasseh -would have presented as great a problem to them as the miseries of -Job. They looked to temporal prosperity as the reward of -righteousness, and to acute misery as the retribution of apostasy and -sin. They had little or no conception of a future which should redress -the balance of apparent earthly inequalities. Alike the sight of -Manasseh's long reign and Josiah's undeserved death in battle would -give a powerful shock to their fixed convictions. - -Far different is the end of the story in the Book of Chronicles. The -records of Esarhaddon tell us that in 680 he made an expedition into -Palestine to restore the shaken influence of his father,[643] and -about 647 he mentions among his submissive tributaries the kings of -Tyre, Edom, Moab, Gaza, Ekron, Askelon, Gebal, Ammon, Ashdod, and -Manasseh, King of Judah ("Minasi-sar-Yahudi"), as well as ten princes -of Cyprus. Whether the King of Judah rebelled later on, and intrigued -with Tirhakah, we do not know; but in 2 Chron. xxxiii. 11 we read that -Esarhaddon sent his generals to Jerusalem, took Manasseh by stratagem, -drove rings through his lips, bound him in chains, and brought him to -Babylon, where Esarhaddon was holding his court.[644] We find from the -_Eponym Canon_ that Tyre revolted from Assyria in the tenth year of -Esarhaddon, and Manasseh may have been drawn away to join in the -revolt; or he may have joined Shamash-shum-ukin, the Viceroy of -Babylon, in his revolt against his brother Assurbanipal. As a rule, -the lot of a conquered vassal at the Assyrian Court was horrible, and -in his utter misery Manasseh repented, humbled himself, and -prayed.[645] His prayer was heard. The despots of Nineveh were -capricious alike in their insults and in their favours, and -Esarhaddon not only pardoned Manasseh, but sent him back to -Jerusalem,[646] thinking that he would be more useful to him there -than in a Babylonian dungeon. After this reprieve he lived like a -penitent and a patriot. Esarhaddon was preparing for his expedition -against Tirhakah, and would not attack a king who was now bound to him -by gratitude as well as fear. But the times were very troublous. -Manasseh prepared for eventualities by building an outer wall on the -west of the city of David, unto Gihon in the Valley, by surrounding -Ophel with a high wall, and by garrisoning the fenced cities.[647] All -this was necessary and patriotic work, considering that Judah might be -attacked by other enemies as well as the Assyrians. She was like a -grain of corn amid the grinding mills of the nations. Media and Lydia -were rising into strong kingdoms. Babylon was becoming daily more -formidable. Dim rumours reached the East of movements among vast hosts -of Cimmerian and Scythian barbarians. Jerusalem had no human strength -for war. She could only rely upon her battlements, on the natural -strength of her position, and on the protection of her God. Almost in -the last year of Manasseh, the powerful Psammetichus I., king of a now -united Egypt, made an assault on Ashdod; but he did not venture on the -difficult task of besieging Jerusalem. - -The religious reformation of Manasseh attested the sincerity of his -amendment. He flung out the Asherah from the Temple, put away the -strange gods, destroyed the altars, burnt sacrifices to God, and used -all his power to restore the worship of Jehovah. He did not, however, -destroy the high places. For this story the Chronicler refers to "the -words of Chozai,"[648] according to the present text, which some -suppose to have meant "the story of the Seers." He also refers to a -prayer of Manasseh, which cannot of course be the Greek forgery of the -second or third century which goes by that name in the Apocrypha.[649] -His repentance doubtless secured his own salvation. "Whoso saith -'Manasseh hath no part in the world to come,'" said Rabbi Johanan, -"discourageth the penitent";--but the partial reformation was too late -to save his land. - -Is this a literal history, or an edifying Haggadah? The non-historical -character of the story is maintained by De Wette, Graf, Noeldeke, and -many others. Both views have been taken. This we can, at any rate, -assert--that there seems to be nothing in the story which is -inconsistent with probability. The Chronicler may have derived it from -genuine documents or traditions, though it is difficult to account for -the silence of the elder and more trustworthy historian. Nor is it -only his silence for which we have to account; it is the continuance -of his positive statements. It would be, in any case, a strange -conception of history which, after narrating a man's crimes, omitted -alike the retribution which befell him on account of them, the -heartfelt penitence for the sake of which they were forgiven, and the -seriously earnest endeavour to undo at least something of the evil -which he had done. Not only does the historian make these omissions, -but in no subsequent allusion to Manasseh does he so much as indicate -that he is aware of his amendment.[650] He says that Amon "did evil in -the sight of the Lord, as his father Manasseh did."[651] He speaks of -the altars to the hosts of heaven which Manasseh had made in the two -courts of the Temple as still standing in the reign of Josiah, though -the Chronicler tells us that Manasseh had cast them all out of the -city.[652] He says that, notwithstanding all that Josiah did, "the -Lord turned not from the fierceness of His great wrath, because of all -the provocations that Manasseh had provoked Him withal,"[653] and that -on this account God cast off Jerusalem. Never, even by the most -distant allusions, does he refer to Manasseh's captivity, his prayer, -his penitence, or his counter-efforts. Had he been aware of these, his -silence would have been neither generous nor just. Nay, he even leaves -apparent facts at conflict with the Chronicler's story, for he makes -Josiah do all that the Chronicler tells us that Manasseh himself had -done in the removal of his worst abominations. - -Even now we have not exhausted the historic difficulties which -surround the repentance of Manasseh. During his reign Jeremiah -received his call, and while still a young boy began his work. Neither -he, nor Zephaniah, nor Habakkuk drop the slightest hint that the -wicked, idolatrous king had ever turned over a new leaf. Jeremiah's -silence is specially difficult to account for. He, too, records -Jehovah's final and irrevocable decree, that He would give up Judah to -death, to exile, and to famine, to the sword to slay, to the dogs to -tear, to the fowls of the heaven and the beasts of the earth to devour -and to destroy.[654] And the cause of the pitiless doom pronounced by -a Judge weary of repenting is "because of Manasseh, the son of -Hezekiah, King of Judah, for that which he did in Jerusalem."[655] - -The judgment was not long delayed. - -It was the vast movement of the Scythians in Media and Western Asia, -and the rumours of it, which gave to Manasseh and Amon such respite as -they had; and even this respite was full of misery and fear.[656] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[624] One legend says that Hephzibah was a daughter of Isaiah. Not so -Josephus (_Antt._, X. iii. 1). - -[625] See Gen. xli. 51. His name may have referred to the new union -between the Northern and Southern Kingdoms. Comp. 2 Chron. xxx. 6, -xxxi. 1. - -[626] Chron. xxxiv. 1-3. - -[627] See Zeph. i. 8. Comp. 2 Chron. xxiv. 17; Isa. xxviii. 14; Jer. -v. 5, etc. - -[628] Mic. vii. 1-20. - -[629] LXX., [Greek: te Baal]. The feminine, however, does not imply -that Baal was here worshipped as a female deity, but is probably due -to the fact that later Jews always avoided using the _names_ of idols -(from a misapprehension or too literal view of Exod. xxiii. 13), and -therefore called Baal _Bosheth_ ("shame"), which is feminine. Hence -the names Mephibosheth, Jerubbesheth, Ishbosheth. In Suidas (_s.v._ -[Greek: Manasses]) he is charged with having set up in the Temple "a -four-faced image of Zeus." - -[630] For [Hebrew: battim], in 2 Kings xxiii. 7, the LXX. read [Greek: -chettim] (?). Graetz, (_Gesch. d. Juden._, ii. 277) suggests [Hebrew: -benadim], "broidered robes." Ezek. xvi. 16. See Herod., i. 199; -Strabo, xvi. 1058; Luc., _De Dea. Syr._, Sec. 6; Libanius, _Opp._, xi. -456, 557; _Ep. of Jeremy_, 43; Doellinger, _Judenthum u. Heidenthum_, -i. 431; Rawlinson, _Phoenicia_, 431. - -[631] Chron. xxxiii. 3; 2 Kings xxiii. 5. Movers, _Rel. d. Phoeniz._, i. -65 "In all the books of the Old Testament written before the Assyrian -period no trace of star-worship is to be to found." 2 Kings xvii. 16. - -[632] Jer. vii. 18, viii. 2, xix. 13; Zeph. i, 5. - -[633] See Deut. iv. 19, xvii. 3. - -[634] 2 Kings xxiii. 11, 12. - -[635] See Jer. vii, 31, 32, xix. 2-6, xxxii. 35; Psalm cvi. 37, 38. - -[636] Ewald infers from Isa. lvii. 5-9; Jer. ii. 5-13, that he actually -_sought_ for all foreign kinds of worship, in order to introduce them. - -[637] 1 Sam. iii. 11; Jer. xix. 3. - -[638] Comp. Isa. xxxiv. 11; Lam. ii. 8. - -[639] 2 Kings xxi. 13. LXX., [Greek: alabastros], _al._ [Greek: -pyxion]. The Vulgate also takes it to mean the obliteration of writing -on a tablet: "Delebo Jerusalem sicut deleri solent tabulae; et ducam -crebrius stylum super faciem ejus." - -[640] 2 Kings xxi. 16; Heb., "from mouth to mouth"; LXX., [Greek: -stoma eis stoma]; Vulg., _donec impleret Jerusalem usque ad os_. Comp. -2 Kings x. 21. - -[641] _Antt._, X. iii, 1: "He butchered alike all the just among the -Hebrews." To this reign of terror some refer Psalm xii. 1; Isa. lvii. -1-4. - -[642] This (as I have said) cannot be regarded as certain. Isaiah -began to prophesy in the year that King Uzziah died, sixty years -before Manasseh. It is a Jewish Haggadah. See Gesen on Isa. i., p. 9, -and the Apocryphal "Ascension of Isaiah." - -[643] Esarhaddon reigned only eight years, till 668, and then resigned -in favour of his son Assurbanipal. In his reign Psammetichus recovered -Egypt, and put an end to the Dodecarchy. In the reign of his -successor, Assuredililani, Assyria began to decline (647-625). - -[644] Comp. Isa. xxxix. 6; Jos., _Antt._, X. iii. 2. The phrase "among -the thorns" means "_with rings_" (comp. Isa. xxx. 28, xxxvii. 29; -Ezek. xxxviii. 4; Amos iv. 2). Assurbanipal says similarly that he -seized Necho, "bound him with bonds and iron chains, hands and feet," -but afterwards allowed him to return to Egypt (Schrader, ii. 59). - -[645] Late and worthless Haggadoth, echoed by still later writers -(Suidas and Syncellus), say he was kept in a brazen cage, fed on bran -bread dipped in vinegar, etc. See _Apost. Constt._, ii. 22: "And the -Lord hearkened to his voice, and there became about him a flame of -fire, and all the irons about him melted." John Damasc., _Parall._, -ii. 15, quotes from Julius Africanus, that while Manasseh was saying a -psalm his iron bonds burst, and he escaped. See _Speakers Commentary_, -on Apocrypha, ii. 363. - -[646] Such pardon from a king of Assyria was rare, but not -unparalleled. Pharaoh Necho I. was taken in chains to Nineveh, and -afterwards set free (Schrader, _K. A. T._, p. 371). - -[647] See 2 Chron. xxvii. 3. The "fish gate" was, perhaps, a weak -point (Zeph. i. 10). - -[648] 2 Chron. xxxiii. 19. Heb., _dibhri Chozai_; A.V., "the story of -the Seers"; R.V., "in the history of Hozai"; LXX., [Greek: epi ton -logon ton ouranion]; Vulg., _in sermonibus Hozai_. The elements of -doubt suggested by the name "Babylon," and by the liberation of -Manasseh, have been removed by further knowledge. See Budge, _Hist. of -Esarhaddon_, p. 78; Schrader, _K. A. T._, 369 ff. - -[649] Since the Council of Trent this prayer has been relegated to the -end of the Vulgate with 3, 4, Esdras. Verse 8 (the supposed sinlessness -of the Patriarchs) at once shows it to be a mere composition. - -[650] 2 Kings xxiii. 12. - -[651] 2 Kings xxi. 20. - -[652] 2 Chron. xxxiii. 15. - -[653] 2 Kings xxiii. 26. - -[654] Jer. xv. 1-9. - -[655] The later Jews certainly took no account of his repentance. His -name was execrated (see the substitution of Manasseh for Moses in -Judg. xviii. 30), and he was denied all part in the world to come. The -Apocryphal "Prayer of Manasses" has no authority, though it is -interesting (Butler, _Analogy_, pt. ii., ch. v.). - -[656] In estimating the Chronicler's story, we cannot wholly forget the -fact that a number of Haggadic legends clustered thickly round the name -of Manasseh in the literature of the later Jews. He is charged with -incest, with the murder of Isaiah, the distortion of Scripture, etc., -and is represented as having got to heaven, not by real repentance, but -by challenging God on His superiority to idols. The Targum, after 2 -Chron. xxxiii. 11, adds, "And the Chaldees made a copper mule, and -pierced it all over with little holes, and put him therein. And when he -was in straits, he cried in vain to all his idols. Then he prayed to -Jehovah and humbled himself; but the angels shut every window and -lattice of heaven, that his prayer might not enter. But forthwith the -pity of the Lord of the world rolled forth, and He made an aperture in -heaven, and the mule burst asunder, and the Spirit breathed on him, and -he forsook all his idols." "No books," says Dr. Neubauer, "are more -subject to additions and various adaptations than popular histories." -See Mr. Ball's commentary (_Speaker's Commentary_, ii. 309, and -_Sanhedrin_, f. 99, 2; 101, 1; 103, 2). - - - - - _AMON_[657] - - B.C. 641-639 - - 2 KINGS xxi. 19-26 - -The brief reign of Amon is only a sort of unimportant and miserable -annex to that of his father. As he was twenty-two years old when he -began to reign, he must have witnessed the repentance and reforming zeal -of his father, if, in spite of all difficulties, we assume that -narrative to be historical. In that case, however, the young man was -wholly untouched by the latter phase of Manasseh's life, and flung -himself headlong into the career of the king's earlier idolatries. "He -walked in all the way that his father walked in, and served the idols -that his father served, and worshipped them"--which was the more -extraordinary if Manasseh's last acts had been to dethrone and destroy -these strange gods. He even "multiplied trespass," so that in his son's -reign we find every form of abomination as triumphant as though Manasseh -had never attempted to check the tide of evil. We know nothing more of -Amon. Apparently he only reigned two years.[658] He is the only Jewish -king who bears the name of a foreign--an Egyptian--deity. - -For pictures of the state of things in this reign we may look to the -prophets Zephaniah and Jeremiah, and they are forced to use the -darkest colours. - -This is Zephaniah's picture:-- - - "Woe to her that is rebellious and polluted, to the oppressing city! - She obeyed not the voice; she received not instruction; - She trusted not in the Lord; she drew not near to her God. - Her princes in the midst of her are roaring lions; - Her judges are evening wolves; they gnaw not the bones on the morrow. - Her prophets are light and treacherous persons: - Her priests have profaned the sanctuary, they have done violence to - the law."[659] - -He tells us that Baal and his black-robed _chemarim_[660] are still -prevalent--that men worshipped on their house-tops the host of heaven, -and swore by "Moloch their king." Therefore would God search Jerusalem -with candles, and would visit the men who had sunk, like thick wine on -the lees, and who said in their infidel hearts, "Jehovah will not do -good, neither will He do evil." He is an Epicurean God, a cypher, a -_faineant_. "Men make all kinds of fine calculations," says Luther, -"but the Lord God says to them, 'For whom, then, do you hold Me? For a -cypher? Do I sit here in vain, and to no purpose? You shall know that -I will turn their accounts about finely, and make them all false -reckonings.'" - -Not less dark is the view of Jeremiah.[661] Like Diogenes in Athens, -Jeremiah in vain searches Jerusalem for a faithful man. Among the poor -he finds brutish obstinacy, among the rich insolent defiance. They -were like fed horses in the morning--lecherous and unruly. They are -slanderers, adulterers, corrupters, murderers. They worship Baal and -strange gods. "They set a trap, they catch men. As a cage is full of -birds, so are their houses full of deceit. They are waxen fat, they -shine; yea, they overpass in deeds of wickedness."[662] "An -astonishment and horror is done in the land; the prophets prophesy -falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means; and My people love -to have it so: and what will ye do in the end thereof?"[663] - -"From the least of them even unto the greatest of them every one is -given to covetousness; and from the prophet even unto the priest every -one dealeth falsely. They have treated also the hurt of My people -lightly, saying, 'Peace, peace,' when there is no peace. Were they -ashamed when they had committed abominations? Nay, they were not at -all ashamed, neither could they blush: therefore shall they fall among -them that fall."[664] - -The wretched reign ended wretchedly. Amon met the fate of Amaziah and -of Joash. He was murdered by conspirators--by some of his own -courtiers--in his own palace. He was not the victim of any general -rebellion. The people of the land were apparently content with the -existent idolatry, which left them free for lives of lust and luxury, -of greed and gain. They resented the disorder introduced by an -intrigue of eunuchs or court officials. They rose and slew the whole -band of conspirators. Amon was buried with his father in the new -burial-place of the Kings in the garden of Uzza, and the people placed -his son Josiah--a child of eight years old--upon the throne. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[657] The name Amon is unusual. Some identify it with the name of the -Egyptian sun-god (Nah. iii. 8). If so, we see yet another element of -Manasseh's syncretism, and (as some fancy) an attempt to open -relations with Psammetichus of Egypt. But perhaps the name may be -Hebrew for "Architect" (1 Kings xxii. 26; Neh. vii. 59). - -[658] 2 Kings xxi. 19. The LXX. reads "twelve years," but not so -Josephus (_Antt._, X. iv. 1), or 2 Chron. xxxiii. 21. - -[659] Zeph. iii. 1-11. Comp. i. 4. - -[660] _Chemarim_, 2 Kings xxiii. 5; Hos. x. 5. The root in Syriac -means "to be sad," but Kimchi derives it from a root "to be black." -The Vulgate renders it _aeditui_ and _aruspices_. - -[661] We are told in the titles of their books that both these -prophets prophesied in the days of Josiah; but such pictures can only -apply to the earliest years of his reign. - -[662] See Jer. v., vi., vii., _passim_. - -[663] Jer. vi. 13-15. - -[664] Jer. v. 30, 31. - - - - - CHAPTER XXX - - _JOSIAH_ - - B.C. 639-608[665] - - 2 KINGS xii., xxiii - - [Greek: "Ten de physin autos aristos hyperche kai pros areten heu - gegonos."]--Jos., _Antt._, iv. 1. - - "In outline dim and vast - Their fearful shadows cast - The giant forms of Empires, on their way - To ruin: one by one - They tower, and they are gone." - KEBLE. - - -If we are to understand the reign of Josiah as a whole, we must preface -it by some allusion to the great epoch-marking circumstances of his age, -which explain the references of contemporary prophets, and which, in -great measure, determined the foreign policy of the pious king. - -The three memorable events of this brief epoch were, (I.) the movement -of the Scythians, (II.) the rise of Babylon, and (III.) the -humiliation of Nineveh, followed by her total destruction. - -I. Many of Jeremiah's earlier prophecies belong to this period, and we -see that both he and Zephaniah--who was probably a great-great-grandson -of King Hezekiah himself,[666] and prophesied in this reign[667]--are -greatly occupied with a danger from the North which seems to threaten -universal ruin. - -So overwhelming is the peril that Zephaniah begins with the -tremendously sweeping menace, "_I will utterly consume all things off -the earth_, saith the Lord." - -Then the curse rushes down specifically upon Judah and Jerusalem; and -the state of things which the prophet describes shows that, if Josiah -began himself to seek the Lord at eight years old, he did not -take--and was, perhaps, unable to take--any active steps towards the -extinction of idolatry till he was old enough to hold in his own hand -the reins of power. - -For Zephaniah denounces the wrath of Jehovah on three classes of -idolaters--viz., (1) the remnant of Baal-worshippers with their -_chemarim_, or unlawful priests, and the syncretising priests -(_kohanim_) of Jehovah, who combine His worship with that of the stars, -to whom they burn incense upon the housetops; (2) the waverers, who -swear at once by Jehovah and by Malcham, their king; and (3) the open -despisers and apostates. For all these the day of Jehovah is near; He -has prepared them for sacrifice, and the sacrificers are at hand.[668] -Gaza, Ashdod, Askelon, Ekron, the Cherethites, Canaan, Philistia, are -all threatened by the same impending ruin, as well as Moab and Ammon, -who shall lose their lands. Ethiopia, too, and Assyria shall be smitten, -and Nineveh shall become so complete a desolation that "pelicans and -hedgehogs shall bivouac upon her chapiters, the owl shall hoot in her -windows, and the crow croak upon the threshold, 'Crushed! desolated!' -and all that pass by shall hiss and wag their hands."[669] - -The pictures of the state of society drawn by Jeremiah do not, as we -have seen, differ from those drawn by his contemporary.[670] Jeremiah, -too, writing perhaps before Josiah's reformation, complains that God's -people have forsaken the fountains of living water, to hew out for -themselves broken cisterns. He complains of empty formalism in the place -of true righteousness, and even goes so far as to say that backsliding -Israel has shown herself more righteous than treacherous Judah (iii. -1-11). He, too, prophesies speedy and terrific chastisement. Let Judah -gather herself into fenced cities, and save her goods by flight, for God -is bringing evil from the North, and a great destruction.[671] - -"The lion is come up from his thicket, and the destroyer of the -nations is on his way; he is gone forth from his place to make thy -land desolate; and thy cities shall be laid waste, without an -inhabitant. Behold, he cometh as clouds, and his chariots shall be as -the whirlwind." Besiegers come from a far country, and give out their -voice against the cities of Judah. The heart of the kings shall -perish, and the heart of the princes; and the priests shall be -astonished, and the prophets shall wonder. - -"For thus hath the Lord said, The whole land shall be desolate; yet -will I not make a full end"--and, "O Jerusalem, wash thine heart from -wickedness, that thou mayest be saved!"[672] - -"I will bring a nation upon you from far, O House of Israel, saith the -Lord: it is a mighty nation, it is an ancient nation, a nation whose -language"--unlike that of the Assyrians--"thou knowest not, neither -understandest what they say. Their quiver is an open sepulchre, they -are all mighty men. They shall batter thy fenced cities, in which thou -trustest with weapons of war."[673] - -"O ye children of Benjamin, save your goods by flight: for evil is -imminent from the North, and a great destruction. Behold, a people -cometh from the North Country, and a great nation shall be raised from -the farthest part of the earth. They lay hold on bow and spear; they are -cruel, and have no mercy; their voice roareth like the sea; and they -ride upon horses, set in array as men for war against thee, O daughter -of Zion. We have heard the fame thereof: our hands wax feeble."[674] - -And the judgment is close at hand. The early blossoming bud of the -almond tree is the type of its imminence. The seething caldron, with -its front turned from the North, typifies an invasion which shall soon -boil over and flood the land.[675] - -What was the fierce people thus vaguely indicated as coming from the -North? The foes indicated in these passages are not the long-familiar -Assyrians, but the Scythians and Cimmerians.[676] - -As yet the Hebrews had only heard of them by dim and distant rumour. -When Ezekiel prophesied they were still an object of terror, but he -foresees their defeat and annihilation. They should be gathered into -the confines of Israel, but only for their destruction.[677] The -prophet is bidden to set his face towards Gog, of the land of Magog, -the Prince of Rosh,[678] Meshech, and Tubal, and prophesy against him -that God would turn him about, and put hooks in his jaws, and drive -forth all his army of bucklered and sworded horsemen, the hordes of -the uttermost part of the North. They should come like a storm upon -the mountains of Israel, and spoil the defenceless villages; but they -should come simply for their own destruction by blood and by -pestilence. God should smite their bows out of their left hands, and -their arrows out of the right, and the ravenous birds of Israel should -feed upon the carcases of their warriors. There should be endless -bonfires of all the instruments of war, and the place of their burial -should be called "the valley of the multitude of Gog." - -Much of this is doubtless an ideal picture, and Ezekiel may be -thinking of the fall of the Chaldaeans. But the terms he uses remind us -of the dim Northern nomads, and the names Rosh and Meshech in -juxtaposition involuntarily recall those of Russia and Moscow.[679] - -Our chief historical authority respecting this influx of Northern -barbarians is Herodotus.[680] He tells us that the nomad Scythians, -apparently a Turanian race, who may have been subjected to the pressure -of population, swarmed over the Caucasus, dispossessed the Cimmerians -(Gomer), and settled themselves in Saccasene, a province of Northern -Armenia. From this province the Scythians gained the name of the Saqui. -The name of Gog seems to be taken from Gugu, a Scythian prince, who was -taken captive by Assurbanipal from the land of the Saqui.[681] Magog is -perhaps Mat-gugu, "land of Gog." These rude, coarse warriors, like the -hordes of Attila, or Zenghis Khan, or Tamerlane--who were descended from -them--magnetised the imagination of civilised people, as the Huns did -in the fourth century.[682] They overthrew the kingdom of Urartis -(Armenia), and drove the all-but exterminated remnant of the Moschi and -Tabali to the mountain-fortresses by the Black Sea, turning them, as it -were, into a nation of ghosts in Sheol.[683] Then they burst like a -thunder-cloud on Mesopotamia, desolating the villages with their -arrow-flights, but too unskilled to take fenced towns. They swept down -the Shephelah of Palestine, and plundered the rich temple of Aphrodite -(Astarte Ourania) at Askelon, thereby incurring the curse of the goddess -in the form of a strange disease. But on the borders of Egypt they were -diplomatically met by Psammetichus (_d._ 611) with gifts and prayers. -Judah seems only to have suffered indirectly from this invasion. The -main army of Scyths poured down the maritime plain, and there was no -sufficient booty to tempt any but their straggling bands to the barren -hills of Judah.[684] It was the report of this over-flooding from the -North which probably evoked the alarming prophecies of Zephaniah and -Jeremiah, though they found their clearer fulfilment in the invasion of -the Chaldees. - -II. This rush of wild nomads averted for a time the fate of Nineveh. - -The Medes, an Aryan people, had settled south of the Caspian, B.C. -790; and in the same century one of these tribes--the Persians--had -settled south-east of Elam the northern coast of the Persian Gulf. -Cyaxares founded the Median Empire, and attacked Nineveh. The Scythian -invasion forced him to abandon the siege, and the Scythians burnt the -Assyrian palace and plundered the ruins. But Cyaxares succeeded in -intoxicating and murdering the Scythian leaders at a banquet, and -bribed the army to withdraw. Then Cyaxares, with the aid of the -Babylonians under Nabopolassar their rebel viceroy, besieged and took -Nineveh--probably about B.C. 608--while its last king and his captains -were revelling at a banquet.[685] - -The fall of Nineveh was not astonishing. The empire had long been -"slowly bleeding to death" in consequence of its incessant wars. The -city deemed itself impregnable behind walls a hundred feet high, on -which three chariots could drive abreast, and mantled with twelve -hundred towers; but she perished, and all the nations--whom she had -known how to crush, but had with "her stupid and cruel tyranny" never -known how to govern--shouted for joy. That joy finds its triumphant -expression in more than one of the prophets, but specially in the -vivid paean of Nahum. His date is approximately fixed at about B.C. -660, by his reference to the atrocities inflicted by Assurbanipal on -the Egyptian city of No-Amon. "Art thou [Nineveh] better," he asks, -"than No-Amon, that was situate among the canals, that had the water -round about her, whose rampart was the Nile, and her wall was the -waters? Yet she went into captivity! Her young children were dashed to -pieces at the head of all the streets: they cast lots for her -honourable men, and all her great men were bound in chains. Thou also -shalt be drunken: thou shalt faint away, thou shalt seek a stronghold -because of the enemy."[686] - -All the details of her fall are dim; but Nineveh was, in the language -of the prophets, swept with the besom of destruction. Her ruins became -stones of emptiness, and the line of confusion was stretched over her. -Nahum ends with the cry,-- - - "There is no assuaging of thy hurt; thy wound is grievous: - All that hear the bruit of this, clap the hands over thee: - For upon whom hath thy wickedness not passed continually?" - -In truth, Assyria, the ferocious foe of Israel, of Judah, and all the -world, vanished suddenly, like a dream when one awaketh;[687] and those -who passed over its ruins, like Xenophon and his Ten Thousand in B.C. -401, knew not what they were.[688] Her very name had become forgotten in -two centuries. "_Etiam periere ruinae!_" The burnt relics and cracked -tablets of her former splendour began to be revealed to the world once -more in 1842, and it is only during the last quarter of a century that -the fragments of her history have been laboriously deciphered. - -III. Such were the events witnessed in their germs or in their -completion by the contemporaries of Josiah and the prophets who -adorned his reign. It was during this period, also, that the power to -whom the ultimate ruin and captivity of Jerusalem was due sprang into -formidable proportions. The ultimate scourge of God to the guilty -people and the guilty city was not to be the Assyrian, nor the -Scythian, nor the Egyptian, nor any of the old Canaanite or Semitic -foes of Israel, nor the Phoenician, nor the Philistine. With all these -she had long contended, and held her own. It was before the Chaldee -that she was doomed to fall, and the Chaldee was a new phenomenon of -which the existence had hardly been recognised as a danger till the -warning prophecy of Isaiah to Hezekiah after the embassy of the rebel -viceroy Merodach-Baladan.[689] - -It is to Habakkuk, in prophecies written very shortly after the death -of Josiah, that we must look for the impression of terror caused by -the Chaldees. - -Nabopolassar,[690] sent by the successor of Assurbanipal to quell a -Chaldaean revolt, seized the viceroyalty of Babylon, and joined Cyaxares -in the overthrow of Nineveh. From that time Babylon became greater and -more terrible than Nineveh, whose power it inherited. Habakkuk (ii. -1-19) paints the rapacity, the selfishness, the inflated ambition, the -cruelty, the drunkenness, the idolatry of the Chaldaeans. He calls them -(i. 5-11) a rough and restless nation, frightful and terrible, whose -horsemen were swifter than leopards, fiercer than evening wolves, flying -to gorge on prey like the vultures, mocking at kings and princes, and -flinging dust over strongholds. Nor has he the least comfort in looking -on their resistless fury, except the deeply significant oracle--an -oracle which contains the secret of their ultimate doom-- - - "Behold, his soul is puffed up; it is not upright in him: - But the righteous man shall live by his fidelity." - -The prophet places absolute reliance on the general principle that -"pride and violence dig their own grave."[691] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[665] Kamphausen (_Die Chronologie der hebraeischer Koenige_) makes -Josiah succeed to the throne in 638. - -[666] Otherwise his genealogy would not be mentioned for four -generations (Hitzig). - -[667] Zeph. i. 1. Jeremiah also was highly connected. He was a priest -and his father Hilkiah may be the high priest who found the book; "for -his uncle Shallum, father of his cousin Hanameel, was the husband of -Huldah the prophetess" (2 Kings xxii. 14; Jer. xxxii. 7). The fact -that Jeremiah's property was at Anathoth, where lived the descendants -of Ithamar (1 Kings ii. 26), whereas Hilkiah was of the family of -Eleazar (1 Chron. vi. 4-13), does not seem fatal to the view that his -father was the high priest. - -[668] Zeph. ii. 4-7. - -[669] Zeph. ii. 12-15. - -[670] Jer. ii. 1-35. Considering the very great part played by -Jeremiah for nearly half a century of the last history of Judah, the -non-mention of his name in the Book of Kings is a circumstance far -from easy to explain. - -[671] Jer. iv. 6, A. V., "retire, stay not." Comp. Isa. x. 24-31. - -[672] Jer. iv. 7-27. - -[673] Jer. v. 15-17. - -[674] Jer. vi. 1, 22, 23, 24. - -[675] The almond tree (_shaqad_) "seems to be awake (_shaqad_), -whatsoever trees are still sleeping in the torpor of winter" (Tristram -_Nat. Hist. of the Bible_, 332; Jer. i. 11-14). - -[676] The name Kimmerii (on the Assyrian inscriptions Gimirrai) is -connected with Gomer. The Persians call them Sakai or Scyths. The -nomad Scyths had driven the Kimmerii from the Dniester while -Psammetichus was King of Egypt. For allusions to this see Jer. vi. 22 -_seq._, viii. 16, ix. 10. The first notice of them is in an -inscription of Esarhaddon, B.C. 677, who says that he defeated -"Tiushpa, _the Gimirrai, a roving warrior_, whose own country was -remote." Zephaniah and Jeremiah were certainly thinking of the -Scythians (Eichhorn, Hitzig, Ewald; and more recently Kuenen, -_Onderzoek_, ii. 123; Wellhausen, _Skizzen_, 150). In B.C. 626 they -could not have consciously had the Chaldaeans in view, though, -twenty-three years later, Jeremiah may have had. - -[677] See Ezek. xxxviii., xxxix. - -[678] Ezek. xxxviii. 2. So Gesenius, Haevernick, etc., and R.V. - -[679] The form in the Vulgate and the Alexandrian MS. of the LXX. is -Mosech; in the Assyrian inscription, Muski. As far back as 1120 -Tiglath-Pileser I. had overrun Tubal (the Tublai, Tabareni) and -Moschi, between the Black Sea and the Taurus. They were neither Aryans -nor Semites. In Gen. x. 2; 1 Chron. i. 5, Gog, Magog, Meshech, and -Gomer are sons of Japheth. They are referred to in Rev. xx. 8. - -[680] Herod., i. 74, 103-106, iv. 1-22, vii. 64; Pliny, _H. N._, v. -16; Jos., _Antt._, I. vi. 1; Syncellus, _Chronogl._, i. 405. - -[681] Sayce, _Ethnology of the Bible; Records of the Past_, ix. 40; -Schrader, _K. A. T._, 159. Some identify Gog with Gyges, King of -Lydia, who was killed in battle _against_ the Scythians, but whose -name stood for a geographical symbol of Asia Minor, sometimes called -Lud. It is said that in 665 Gyges (Gugu) sent two Scythian chiefs as a -present to Nineveh. - -[682] Hence, in 2 Macc. iv. 47, 3 Macc. vii. 5, Scythian is used with -the modern connotation of "Barbarian." - -[683] Ezek. xxxii. 26, 27; Cheyne, _Jeremiah_ ("Men of the Bible") p. -31. - -[684] _Expositor_, 2nd series, iv. 263; Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, 31. Hitzig -and Ewald (erroneously?) refer Psalms lv., lix., to these events, and -it seems also to be an error to suppose that the later name of -Bethshan--Scythopolis--has anything to do with this incursion. Like -the names of Pella, Philadelphia, etc., it is later than the age of -Alexander the Great. See 2 Macc. xii. 30; Jos., _B. J._, II. xviii., -_Vit._ vi. Perhaps Scythopolis is a corruption of Sikytopolis, the -city of Sikkuth; or Scythian may merely stand for "Barbarian," as in 3 -Macc. vii. 5; Col. iii. 11 (Cheyne, _l.c._). - -[685] Nah. i. 10, ii. 5, iii. 12; Diod. Sic., ii. 26. - -[686] Nah. iii. 8-11. - -[687] Strabo, xvi. 1, 3: [Greek: ephanisthe paoachrema]. - -[688] Xen., _Anab._, III. iv. 7. - -[689] Chaldees, Kardim, Kasdim, Kurds. - -[690] Nabu-pal-ussur, "Nebo protect the son" B.C. 625-7. Jos., _Antt._ -X. xi. 1: comp. _Ap._, i. 19. - -[691] Newman, _Hebrew Monarchy_, p. 315. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXI - - _JOSIAH'S REFORMATION_ - - 2 KINGS xxii. 8-20, xxiii. 1-25 - - "And the works of Josias were upright before his Lord with a heart - full of godliness."--1 ESDRAS i. 23. - - "From Zion shall go forth the Law, and the Word of the Lord from - Jerusalem."--ISA. ii. 3. - - -It is from the Prophets--Zephaniah, Jeremiah, Nahum, Habakkuk, -Ezekiel--that we catch almost our sole glimpses of the vast -world-movements of the nations which must have loomed large on the -minds of the King of Judah and of all earnest politicians in that day. -As they did not directly affect the destiny of Judah till the end of -the reign, they do not interest the historian of the Kings or the -later Chronicler. The things which rendered the reign memorable in -their eyes were chiefly two--the finding of "the Book of the Law" in -the House of the Lord, and the consequent religious reformation. - -It is with the first of these two events that we must deal in the -present chapter. - -Josiah began to reign as a child of eight, and it may be that the -emphatic and honourable mention of his mother--Jedidah ("Beloved"), -daughter of Adaiah of Boscath--may be due to the fact that he owed to -her training that early proclivity to faithfulness which earns for him -the unique testimony, that he not only "walked in the way of David -his father," but that "he turned not aside to the right hand or to the -left." - -At first, of course, as a mere child, he could take no very active -steps. The Chronicler says that at sixteen he began to show his -devotion, and at twenty set himself the task of purging Judah and -Jerusalem from the taint of idols. Things were in a bad condition, as we -see from the bitter complaints and denunciations of Zephaniah and -Jeremiah. Idolatry of the worst description was still openly tolerated. -But Josiah was supported by a band of able and faithful advisers. -Shaphan, grandfather of the unhappy Gedaliah--afterwards the Chaldaean -viceroy over conquered Judah--was scribe; Hilkiah, the son of Shallum -and the ancestor of Ezra, was the high priest.[692] By them the king was -assisted, fist in the obliteration of the prevalent emblems of idolatry, -and then in the purification of the Temple. Two centuries and a half had -elapsed since it had been last repaired by Joash, and it must have -needed serious restoration during long years of neglect in the reigns of -Ahaz, of Manasseh, and of Amon. Subscriptions were collected from the -people by "the keepers of the door," and were freely entrusted to the -workmen and their overseers, who employed them faithfully in the objects -for which they were designed.[693] - -The repairs led to an event of momentous influence on all future time. -During the cleansing of the Temple Hilkiah came to Shaphan, and said, "I -have found the Book of the Law in the House of the Lord." Perhaps the -copy of the book had been placed by some priest's hand beside the Ark, -and had been discovered during the removal of the rubbish which neglect -had there accumulated. Shaphan read the book; and when next he had to -see the king to tell him about the progress of the repairs, he said to -him, "Hilkiah the priest hath handed me a book." Josiah bade him read -some of it aloud. It is evident that he read the curses contained in -Deut. xxviii. They horrified the pious monarch; for all that they -contained, and the laws to which they were appended, were wholly new to -him. He might well be amazed that a code so solemn, and purporting to -have emanated from Moses, should, in spite of maledictions so fearful, -have become an absolute dead letter. In deep alarm he sent the priest, -the scribe Shaphan, with his son Ahikam, and Abdon, the son of Micaiah, -and Asahiah, a court official, to inquire of Jehovah, whose great anger -could not but be kindled against king and people by the obliteration and -nullity of His law. They consulted Huldah, the only prophetess mentioned -in the Old Testament, except Miriam and Deborah.[694] She was the wife -of Shallum and keeper of the priests' robes,[695] and she lived in the -suburbs of the city.[696] Her answer was an uncompromising menace. All -the curses which the king had heard against the place and people should -be pitilessly fulfilled,--only, as the king had showed a tender heart, -and had humbled himself before Jehovah, he should go to his own grave in -peace.[697] - -Thereupon the king summoned to the Temple a great assembly of priests, -prophets, and all the people, and, standing by the pillar (or "on the -platform")[698] in the entrance of the inner court, read "all the -words of the Book of the Covenant which had been found in the House of -the Lord" in their ears, and joined with them in "the covenant" to -obey the hitherto unknown or totally forgotten laws which were -inculcated in the newly discovered volume. - -Immediate action followed. The priests were ordered to bring out of the -Temple all the vessels made for Baal, for the Asherah, and for the host -of heaven; they were burnt outside Jerusalem in the Valley of Kedron, -and their ashes taken to Bethel.[699] The _chemarim_ of the high places -were suppressed, as well as all other idolatrous priests who burnt -incense to the signs of the Zodiac, the Hyades, and the heavenly -bodies.[700] The Asherah itself was taken out of the Temple, and it is -truly amazing that we should find it there so late in Josiah's reign. He -burnt it in the Kedron, stamped it to powder, and scattered the powder -"on the graves of the common people." The Chronicler says "on the graves -of them that had sacrificed" to the idols[701];--but this is an -inexplicable statement, since it is (as Professor Lumby says) very -improbable that idolaters had a separate burial-place. It is equally -shocking, and to us incomprehensible, to read that the houses of the -degraded _Qedeshim_ still stood, not "by the Temple" (A.V.), but "_in_ -the Temple,"[702] and that in these houses, or chambers, the women still -"wove embroideries[703] for the Asherah." What was Hilkiah doing? If the -priests of the _high places_ were so guilty from Geba to Beersheba, did -no responsibility attach to the high priest and other priests of the -Temple who permitted the existence of these enormities, not only in the -_bamoth_ at the city gates,[704] but in the very courts of the mountain -of the Lord's House? If the priests of the immemorial shrines were -degraded from their prerogatives, and were not allowed to come up to the -altar of Jehovah in Jerusalem, by what law of justice were they to be -regarded as so immeasurably inferior to the highest members of their own -order, who, for years together, had permitted the worship of a wooden -phallic emblem, and the existence of the worst heathen abominations -within the very Temple of the Lord? Every honest reader must admit that -there are inexplicable difficulties and uncertainties in these ancient -histories, and that our knowledge of the exact circumstances--especially -in all that regards the priests and Levites, who, in the Chronicles, are -their own ecclesiastical historians--must remain extremely imperfect. - -And what can be meant by the clause that the degraded priests of the -old high places, though they were not allowed to serve at the great -altar, yet "did eat of the _unleavened bread_ among their brethren"? -Unleavened bread was only eaten at the Passover; and when there _was_ -a Passover, was eaten by all alike. Perhaps the reading for -"unleavened bread" should be (priestly) "portions"--a reading found by -Geiger in an old manuscript. - -Continuing his work, Josiah defiled Tophet;[705] took away the horses -given by the kings of Judah to the sun, which were stabled beside the -chamber of the eunuch Nathan-Melech in the precincts;[706] and burnt -the sun-chariots in the fire. He removed the altars to the stars on -the roof of the upper chamber of Ahaz,[707] and ground them to powder. -He also destroyed those of his grandfather Manasseh in the two Temple -courts--which we supposed to have been removed by Manasseh in his -repentance--and threw the dust into the Kedron. He defiled the -idolatrous shrines reared by Solomon to the deities of Sidon, Ammon, -and Moloch, broke the pillars, cut down the Asherim, and filled their -places with dead men's bones.[708] Travelling northwards, he burnt, -destroyed, and stamped to powder the altars and the Asherim at Bethel, -and burnt upon the altars the remains found in the sepulchres,[709] -only leaving undisturbed the remains of the old prophet from Judah, -and of the prophet of Samaria.[710] He then destroyed the other -Samaritan shrines, exercising an undisputed authority over the -Northern Kingdom. The mixed inhabitants did not interfere with his -proceedings; and in the declining fortunes of Nineveh, the Assyrian -viceroy--if there was one--did not dispute his authority. Lastly, in -accordance with the fierce injunction of Deut. xvii. 2-5, "he slew all -the priests of the high places" on their own altars, burnt men's bones -upon them, and returned to Jerusalem. - -It is very difficult, with the milder notions which we have learnt -from the spirit of the Gospel, to look with approval on the -recrudescence of the Elijah-spirit displayed by the last proceeding. -But many centuries were to elapse, even under the Gospel Dispensation, -before men learnt the sacred principle of the early Christians that -"violence is hateful to God." Josiah must be judged by a more lenient -judgment, and he was obeying a mandate found in the new Book of the -Law. But the question arises whether the fierce commands of -Deuteronomy were ever intended to be taken _au pied de la lettre_. May -not Deut. xiii. 6-18 have been intended to express in a concrete but -ideal form the spirit of execration to be entertained towards -idolatry? Perhaps in thinking so we are only guilty of an anachronism, -and are applying to the seventh century before Christ the feelings of -the nineteenth century after Christ. - -After this Josiah ordered the people to keep a Deuteronomic Passover, -such as we are told--and as all the circumstances prove--had not been -kept from the days of the Judges. The Chronicler revels in the details -of this Passover, and tells us that Josiah gave the people thirty -thousand lambs and kids, and three thousand bullocks; and his priests -gave two thousand six hundred small cattle, and three hundred oxen; -and the chief of the Levites gave the Levites five thousand small -cattle, and five hundred oxen. He goes on to describe the slaying, -sprinkling of blood, flaying, roasting, boiling in pots, pans, and -caldrons, and attention paid to the burnt-offerings and the fat;[711] -but neither the historians nor the chroniclers, either here or -anywhere else, say one word about the Day of Atonement, or seem aware -of its existence. It belongs to the Post-Exilic Priestly Code, and is -not alluded to in the Book of Deuteronomy. - -Continuing his task, he put away them that had familiar spirits -(_oboth_), and the wizards, and the _teraphim_, with a zeal shown by -no king before or after him; but Jehovah "turned not from the -fierceness of His anger, because of all the provocations which -Manasseh had provoked Him withal." Evil, alas! is more diffusive, and -in some senses more permanent, than good, because of the perverted -bias of human nature. Judah and Jerusalem had been radically -corrupted by the apostate son of Hezekiah, and it may be that the -sudden and high-handed reformation enforced by his grandson depended -too exclusively on the external impulse given to it by the king to -produce deep effects in the hearts of the people. Certain it is that -even Jeremiah--though he was closely connected with the finders of the -book, had perhaps been present when the solemn league and covenant was -taken in the Temple, and lived through the reformation in which he -probably took a considerable part--was profoundly dissatisfied with -the results. It is sad and singular that such should have been the -case; for in the first flush of the new enthusiasm he had written, -"Cursed be the man that heareth not the words of this covenant, which -I commanded your fathers in the day that I brought them forth out of -the land of Egypt, saying, 'Obey My voice.'"[712] Nay, it has been -inferred that he was even an itinerant preacher of the newly found -law; for he writes: "And the Lord said unto me, 'Proclaim all these -words in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem, saying, -Hear ye the words of this covenant, and do them.'"[713] - -The style of Deuteronomy, as is well known, shows remarkable -affinities with the style of Jeremiah. Yet it is clear that after the -death of Josiah the prophet became utterly disillusioned with the -outcome of the whole movement. It proved itself to be at once -evanescent and unreal. The people would not give up their beloved -local shrines.[714] The law, as Habakkuk says (i. 4), became torpid; -judgment went not forth to victory; the wicked compassed about the -righteous, and judgment was perverted. It was easy to obey the -external regulations of Deuteronomy; it was far more difficult to be -true to its noble moral precepts. The reformation of Josiah, so -violent and radical, proved to be only skin-deep; and Jeremiah, with -bitter disappointment, found it to be so. External decency might be -improved, but rites and forms are nothing to Him who searcheth the -heart.[715] There was, in fact, an inherent danger in the place -assumed by the newly discovered book. "Since it was regarded as a -State authority, there early arose a kind of book-science, with its -pedantic pride and erroneous learned endeavours to interpret and apply -the Scriptures. At the same time there arose also a new kind of -hypocrisy and idolatry of the letter, through the new protection which -the State gave to the religion of the book acknowledged by the law. -Thus scholastic wisdom came into conflict with genuine prophecy."[716] - -How entirely the improvement of outward worship failed to improve men's -hearts the prophet testifies.[717] "The sin of Judah," he says, "is -written with a pen of iron, and with the point of a diamond: it is -graven upon the tablets of their hearts, and upon the horns of their -altars, and their Asherim by the green trees[718] upon the high hills. O -My mountain in the field, I will cause thee to serve thine enemies in -the land thou knowest not: for ye have kindled a fire in Mine eyes, -which shall burn for ever." While Josiah lived this apostasy was secret; -but as soon as he died the people "turned again to folly,"[719] and -committed all the old idolatries except the worship of Moloch. There -arose a danger lest even the moderate ritualism of Deuteronomy should be -perverted and exaggerated into mere formality. In the energy of his -indignation against this abuse, Jeremiah has to uplift his voice against -any trust even in the most decided injunctions of this newly discovered -law. He was "a second Amos upon a higher platform." The Deuteronomic Law -did not as yet exhibit the concentrated sacerdotalism and ritualism -which mark the Priestly Code, to which it is far superior in every way. -It is still prophetic in its tone. It places social interests above -rubrics of worship. It expresses the fundamental religious thought "that -Jehovah is in no sense inaccessible; that He can be approached -immediately by all, and without sacerdotal intervention; that He asks -nothing for Himself, but asks it as a religious duty that man should -render unto man what is right; that His Will lies not in any known -height, but in the moral sphere which is known and understood by -all."[720] The book ordained certain sacrifices; yet Jeremiah says with -startling emphasis, "To what purpose cometh there to Me frankincense -from Sheba, and the sweet calamus from a far country? Your -burnt-offerings are not acceptable, nor your sacrifices pleasant unto -Me."[721] Therefore He bids them, "Put your burnt-offerings to your -sacrifices, and eat them as flesh"--_i.e._, "Throw all your offerings -into a mass, and eat them at your pleasure (regardless of sacerdotal -rules): they have neither any inherent sanctity nor any secondary -importance from the characters of the offerers."[722] And in a still -more remarkable passage, "_For I spake not unto your fathers, nor -commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, -concerning burnt-offerings and sacrifices_: but this thing I commanded -them, saying, 'Obey My voice.'"[723] - -Nay, in the most emphatic ordinances of Deuteronomy he found that the -people had created a new peril. They were putting a particularistic -trust in Jehovah, as though He were a respecter of persons, and they His -favourites. They fancied, as in the days of Micah, that it was enough -for them to claim His name, and bribe Him with sacrifices.[724] Above -all, they boasted of and relied upon the possession of His Temple, and -placed their trust on the punctual observance of external ceremonies. -All these sources of vain confidence it was the duty of Jeremiah rudely -to shatter to pieces. Standing at the gates of the Lord's House, he -cried: "Trust ye not in lying words, saying, 'The Temple of the Lord! -the Temple of the Lord! the Temple of the Lord, are these!' Behold, ye -trust in lying words, that cannot profit. Will ye steal, murder, commit -adultery, swear falsely, burn incense unto Baal, and walk after other -gods; and come and stand before Me in this house, whereupon My name is -called, and say, 'We are delivered,' that ye may do all these -abominations? Is this house become a den of robbers in your eyes? But go -ye now to My place which was in Shiloh, where I caused My name to dwell -at the first, and see what I did to it for the wickedness of My people. -I will do unto this house as I have done to Shiloh; and I will cast you -out of My sight, as I have cast out the whole house of -Ephraim."[725]--Yet all hope was not extinguished for ever. The Scythian -might disappear; the Babylonian might come in his place; but one day -there should be a new covenant of pardon and restitution; and as had -been promised in Deuteronomy, "_all_ should know Jehovah, from the least -to the greatest." - -At last he even prophesies the entire future annulment of the solemn -covenant made on the basis of Deuteronomy, and says that Jehovah will -make a new covenant with His people, not according to the covenant -which He made with their fathers.[726] And in his final estimate of -King Josiah after his death, he does not so much as mention his -reformation, his iconoclasm, his sweeping zeal, or his enforcement of -the Deuteronomic Law, but only says to Jehoiakim:-- - -"'Did not thy father eat and drink, and do judgment and justice?--then -it was well with him. He judged the cause of the poor and needy; then -it was well. _Was not this to know Me?' saith the Lord_."[727] - -Whether because its methods were too violent, or because it only -affected the surface of men's lives, or because the people were not -really ripe for it, or because no reformation can ever succeed which -is enforced by autocracy, not spread by persuasion and conviction, it -is certain that the first glamour of Josiah's movement ended in -disillusionment. A religion violently imposed from without as a -state-religion naturally tends to hypocrisy and externalism. What -Jehovah required was, not a changed method of worship, but a changed -heart; and this the reformation of Josiah did not produce. It has -often been so in human history. Failure seems to be written on many of -the most laudable human efforts. Nevertheless, truth ultimately -prevails. Isaiah was murdered, and Urijah, and Jeremiah. Savonarola -was burnt, and Huss, and many a martyr more; but the might of -priestcraft was at last crippled, to be revived, we hope, no more, -either by open violence or secret apostasy. - - "Then to side with Truth is noble, when we share her wretched - crust, - Ere her cause bring fame and profit, and 'tis prosperous to - be just; - Then it is the brave man chooses, while the coward stands - aside, - Doubting in his abject spirit till his Lord is crucified, - And the multitude make virtue of the faith they have denied." - - -FOOTNOTES: - -[692] 2 Kings xxiii. 4. We have here the first mention of "the second -priest" (if, with Graetz, we read _Cohen mishneh_, as in 2 Kings xxv. -18; Jer. lii. 24). In later days he was called "the Sagan." At this -time he probably acted as "Captain of the Temple" (Graetz, ii. 319). - -[693] Comp. 2 Kings xii. 15, where we find the same remark. - -[694] Exod. xv. 20; Judg. iv. 4; Isa. viii. 3. "The prophetess" seems -to mean "prophet's wife." Noadiah was a false prophetess. - -[695] Exod. xxviii. 2, etc. - -[696] 2 Kings xxii. 14. Heb., _mishneh_, lit. "second"; A.V., "the -college"; R.V., "the second quarter." Perhaps it means "the lower -city" (Neh. xi. 9; Zeph. i. 10). It puzzled the LXX.: [Greek: en te -masena]. Vulg., _in secunda_. Jerome says, "_Haud dubium quin urbis -partem significet quae interiori muro vallabatur_." Comp. Zeph. i. 10, -"an howling from the _second_" (_i.e._, quarter of the city); Neh. xi. -9, where, for "_second over the city_" (A. and R.V.), read "over the -second part of the city." - -[697] Another reading is "in Jerusalem," which gets over an historic -difficulty. - -[698] Comp. 2 Kings xi. 14; LXX., [Greek: epi tou stulou]; Heb., -_al-ha-ammud_; Vulg., _super gradum_. - -[699] 2 Kings xxiii. 4; for "in the fields of Kedron" one version has -[Greek: en to empurismo tou cheimarrhou], "in the burning-place of the -wady,"--perhaps reading _bemisrephoth_ for _bishedamoth_, and alluding -to lime-kilns in the wady. It is surprising that they should carry the -ashes "to Bethel." Thenius suggests the reading [Hebrew: beit-'al], -"place of execution" (lit., "house of nothingness"). - -[700] Hos. x. 5; Zeph. i. 4 (the only other places where the word -occurs). The _delevit_ of the Vulgate (2 Kings xxiii. 5) only means -that he put them down, and the [Greek: katekause] of the LXX. should -be [Greek: katepause]. - -[701] Comp. Jer. ii. 23, where the LXX. has [Greek: en to polyandrio]. -In 2 Chron. xxxiv. 4, perhaps the true reading is, not _Beni-ha-'am_, -but _Beni-hinnom_--which would mean that he scattered the dust in the -gehenna of Jerusalem. Comp. 1 Kings xv. 13. - -[702] For these Galli, see Seneca, _De Vit. Beat._, 27; Pliny, _H. -N._, xi. 49. - -[703] Heb., _bathim_, lit. "tents" or "houses"; Vulg., _quasi -domunculas_. - -[704] In 2 Kings xxiii. 8, Geiger would read "the high places of the -_satyrs_" ([Hebrew: stzrm]). - -[705] Usually derived (as by Selden and Milton) from _toph_, "drum," -but perhaps from _tuph_ (to _spit_ in sign of abhorrence). - -[706] _Parvar_--perhaps "open portico." Renan connects the word with -the Greek [Greek: peribolos]. On horses dedicated to the sun, see Xen. -_Cyrop._, viii. 3, 5, 12; _Anab._, iv. 5. - -[707] See Zeph. i. 5; Jer. xix. 13, xxxii. 29. - -[708] 2 Kings xxiii. 13: "The Mount of Corruption"; Vulg., _Mons -offensionis_; LXX., [Greek: tou orous tou Mosthath]. Some conjecture -that _Maschith_ may be a derisive change for some word which meant -"anointing" (from being the _Oil_ Mountain, _Har ham-mischchah_). - -[709] In burning the bones of the dead, he violated all Jewish -feeling. Amos (ii. 1) had severely rebuked this form of revenge and -insult even in the case of the heathen King of Moab. Bones defiled the -touch (Num. xix. 16; Herod., iv. 73). Josiah's question at Bethel was, -"What _pillar_ is that?" (_tsiyun_). LXX., [Greek: skopelon]. Comp. -Gen. xxxv. 20. - -[710] 1 Kings xiii. 29-31. - -[711] 2 Chron. xxxv. 1-19. - -[712] Jer. xi. 3, 4. Since, in this part of my subject, I make -frequent reference to the prophecies of Jeremiah which are -indispensable to the right understanding of the history, I may here -say that modern critics (Cheyne and others) arrange them as follows:-- - -In the reign of _Josiah_, Jer. ii. 1-iii. 5, iii. 6-vi. 30, vii. 1-ix. -25, xi. 1-17. - -In the reign of _Jehoiakim_, xxvi. 2-6, xlvi. 2-12, xxv., xxxv., and -possibly xvi. 1, xviii. 19-27, xiv., xv., xviii., xi. 18-xii. 17. - -In the reign of _Jehoiachin_, x. 17-23, xiii. - -In the reign of _Zedekiah_, xxii.-xxiv., xxvii.-xxix. 1-11 (?), lii. - -In the _Exile_, xxxix.-xliv. - -[713] See Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, p. 56, _id._ 6. - -[714] Canon Cheyne shows that even Mohammed could not persuade the -Qurashites wholly to give up their black stone at the Kaaba, and their -dolmens and sacred trees (_id._ 103). He left the _aucab_, or -sacrificial stones (_matstseboth_), though he warns his followers -against them (_Quran_, v. 92). - -[715] Jer. xvii. 9-11. - -[716] Ewald, _The Prophets_, iii. 63, 64. - -[717] Jer. xvii. 1-4. - -[718] The Qurashites and other heathen Arabs accounted holy a large -green tree, and every year had a sacrifice in its honour. "On the way to -Hunain we called to God's Messenger (Mohammed) that he should appoint -for us such trees. But he was terrified, and said, 'Lord God, Lord God! -Ye speak even as the Israelites ... ye are still in ignorance,--thus are -heathen enslaved'" (Vakidi, _Book of the Campaigns of God's Messenger_, -quoted by Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, p. 103, from Wellhausen). - -[719] Psalm lxxxv. 8. - -[720] Deut. xxx. 11-14. See Wellhausen, p. 165. - -[721] Jer. vi. 20. The passages of Jeremiah which seem of a different -spirit may have been added by later hands--_e.g._, xxxiii. 18, which -is not in the LXX. - -[722] Jer. vii. 21; Ewald; and Cheyne, _l.c._ 120. So the Jews seem to -have understood it, for they appoint this passage to be read on the -_Haphtara_ after the _Parashah_ about sacrifices from Leviticus. - -[723] Jer, vii. 22, 23. This alone would show that Jeremiah did not -(as earlier critics thought) _write_ "Deuteronomy," in spite of the -numerous close resemblances in phraseology. Thus, Jeremiah often -denounces the priests (i. 18, ii. 8-26, iv. 9, v. 31, viii. 1, xiii. -13, xxxii. 32). Cheyne, p. 82. - -[724] Mic. iii. 11. - -[725] Jer. vii. 4, 8-15. - -[726] Jer. xxxi. 31, 32. - -[727] Jer. xxii. 15, 16. - - - - - NOTE TO CHAPTER XXXI. - - "Jehovah is our Lawgiver."--ISA. xxxiii. 22. - - -What was the Book of the Law which Hilkiah found in the Temple? - -The great majority of eminent modern critics have now come to the -conclusion that it was the kernel of the Book of Deuteronomy. Nor is -this in any sense a mere modern notion. It occurs as far back as St. -Jerome (_Adv. Jovin._, i. 5) and St. Chrysostom (_Hom. in Matt._, ix., -p. 135, B. See W. Rob. Smith, p. 258). - -It is no part of my immediate duty to argue this question, but I may -state that the arguments for this conclusion are partly historical, -partly literary, and partly depend on internal evidence. - -I. As regards the _literary_ argument, it is maintained that-- - -1. The full, rounded, rhetorical style of Deuteronomy, so widely -different from the extreme dryness of other parts of the Torah, could -not have been as yet developed in the days of Moses, and required the -slow training of centuries for its perfection. It is a new phenomenon, -and differs widely from earlier prophetic writings, such as those of -Amos and Hosea. - -2. The style and language of the Deuteronomist are so marked, that -they can scarcely escape an intelligent reader of the English Version. -Riehm enumerates sixty-four characteristic words or phrases. Their -significance lies in the fact that they express obvious ideas, and are -not names for special objects, which force a writer to use peculiar -words. The style closely resembles in many phrases and particulars the -style of Jeremiah, and of him alone among the prophets. "Even -supposing that no historic text," it has been said, "taught us that -the articles of Smalkald were the work of Luther, we should still have -the right to affirm that these articles closely resemble the ideas of -Luther, and could hardly have been published without his cognisance." - -II. As regards _historical_ evidence, we observe that-- - -1. No author earlier than Josiah shows any acquaintance with -Deuteronomy: after that date, proofs of such knowledge abound. - -2. The Book of Deuteronomy insisted with reiterated emphasis on the -centralisation of worship. All its ordinances are framed with a view -to promote this end. But we have seen that there is not a trace of -any belief that local shrines were prohibited earlier than the reign -of Hezekiah, who certainly would have defended his boldness by appeal -to a written law if he had known of such as existing. - -III. As regards _internal_ evidence, we see that-- - -1. Many passages and injunctions of the Book of Deuteronomy differ -entirely from those found in the old Book of the Covenant which forms -the most ancient nucleus of Exodus (Exod. xx. 22-xxiii. 33). - -2. Even the most conservative English critics--even those who, with any -pretence to competent knowledge, argue against the more advanced -conclusions of the Higher Criticism--cannot help admitting that at least -three codes, which in many, and in some fundamental, respects differ -widely from each other, and which make no reference to each other, are -found in our present Pentateuch--viz., that of the Book of the Covenant, -that of the Deuteronomist (D.), and that of the Priestly writer (P.). -All three may contain elements as old as the days of Moses; but most -critics (with scarcely an exception in Germany) now believe that the -Deuteronomic Code, in its present form, is not earlier than the date of -Josiah's reformation (_circ._ B.C. 621); and the Priestly Codex -(whatever older documents may exist in it) not older, in its present -form, than about the time of Ezra (B.C. 444). Dillmann, Kittel, and in -his later days Delitzsch, have been of necessity compelled to give up -the views that, in their present form, D. and P. are as ancient as the -days of Moses. The last German critic who held that Moses wrote our -present Pentateuch was Keil (_d._ 1888). Canon Cheyne argues for the -late date of this misnamed "Deuteronomy," on the grounds that the -authors (1) used documents manifestly later than Moses; (2) alluded to -events which only occurred long after Moses; and (3) expressed ideas -which, in the age of Moses, are not psychologically possible. - -The Book of Deuteronomy consists mainly of an historical introduction, -probably added later (i. 1-5); Moses' _first_ discourse (i. 6-iv. 40); -Moses' _second_ discourse (iv. 44-xxvi.); a section marked specially by -blessings and curses (xxvii.-xxix.); a _third_ discourse of Moses (xxix. -2-xxx. 20); his farewell (xxxi. 1-13); his song (xxxi. 14-xxxii. 47); -conclusion, narrating his blessing and death (xxxii. 48-xxxiv. 12). - -I have no space here to enter fully into the arguments which seem -decisive as to the date of the main part of Deuteronomy. Those who -desire to see them must study Colenso, _The Pentateuch_, pt. iii.; -Reuss, _Hist. Sainte et la Loi_, i. 154-211; W. Robertson Smith, _Old -Test. in the Jewish Church_, lect. xvi.; Kuenen, _The Hexateuch_, E. -T., 1886; Kittel, _Gesch. d. Hebraeer_, pp. 43-59; Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, -pp. 48-86; S. R. Driver, _s.v._ "Deuteronomy" (Smith's _Dict. of the -Bible_, new ed.); W. Aldis Wright, _The Documents of the Hexateuch_, -pp. lvii.-lxxix. The name "Deuteronomy" (or "second law") arises from -the mistaken rendering of the LXX. and Vulgate in Deut. xvii. 18. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXII - - _THE DEATH OF JOSIAH_ - - B.C. 608 - - 2 KINGS xxiii. 29, 30 - - "Howl, O fir tree; for the cedar is fallen."--ZECH. xi. 2. - - -Josiah survived by thirteen years the reformation and covenant which -are the chief events of his reign. He lived in prosperity and peace. -He did justice and judgment; the poor and needy flourished under his -royal protection; and it was well with him. It seemed as if the -Deuteronomic blessings on faithfulness to its law were about to be -abundantly fulfilled, when "the azure calm of heaven" was suddenly -shattered, and "down came the thunderbolt." The great and victorious -Assurbanipal of Assyria had died, and left his power to weaker -successors. Meanwhile, Egypt was growing in power and splendour under -Pharaoh Necho II. (B.C. 612-596), the sixth king of the twenty-fifth -or Saitic dynasty. He nearly anticipated M. de Lesseps in making the -Suez Canal,[728] and perhaps actually anticipated Vasco de Gama in -rounding the Cabo Tormentoso, or Cape of Good Hope, in a three years' -voyage. He was fired by the ambitious dream of succeeding the -Assyrians as the chief power in the world, or at any rate of seizing -part of the dominions which they had conquered.[729] Accordingly, in -B.C. 608, he went up against the King of Assyria to the river -Euphrates. The Chronicler says that his destination was Carchemish, on -the Euphrates, and some have conjectured that the vague phrase -"against the King of Assyria" is incorrect, and that, as Josephus -states, he was really marching against the Medes and Babylonians after -the fall of Nineveh.[730] - -With this expedition Josiah was not greatly concerned. He may have -begun his reign as the vassal of Assurbanipal; but if so, it is -probable that he had long since ceased to pay tribute to a power which -was tottering to its fall under the attacks of Scythians and -Babylonians. He had availed himself of the disorganisation of the -Assyrian power to re-establish some, at least, of the old authority of -the House of David over the Northern Kingdom, and perhaps he only -undertook the desperate expedient of withstanding the northward march -of the Egyptian host under the notion that either on the march or on -his return the Pharaoh intended to subjugate Palestine to Egypt. - -Pharaoh Necho II., among his other achievements, had created a -powerful fleet,[731] and it is nearly certain that he did not advance -along the coast of Palestine, but made his way by sea to Acco or -Dor.[732] Here he received the news that Josiah meant to block his -path at Megiddo, on the plain of Jezreel. That plain has been the -great and only possible battle-field of Palestine, from the revolt in -which Barak destroyed the host of Jabin,[733] to that in which Tryphon -met Jonathan the Maccabee,[734] and Kleber in 1799 defeated -twenty-five thousand Turks with three thousand French. - -The Chronicler here adds a very remarkable incident.[735] Necho, like -Joash of Israel in former days, did not care to fight with the poor -little King of Judah--or at any rate did not wish to do so at present, -when he was on his way to the greater encounter. He therefore sent an -embassy to Josiah, saying, "What have I to do with thee, King of -Judah? I come not against thee this day, but against the house -wherewith I have war.[736] For God [Elohim] commanded me [in a dream] -to make haste.[737] Forbear, then, from meddling with God, who is with -me, that He destroy thee not." - -The conjecture "in a dream" is not unlikely, nor is it in disaccord -with other events in the annals of the Pharaohs and the Sargonidae of -Assyria.[738] We may indeed be surprised that an Egyptian Pharaoh -should profess to deliver to a Jewish king the messages of Elohim, -though we have seen something like this in the case of the -Rabshakeh.[739] The variation in 1 Esdras i. 26-28 is curious and -interesting. We are there told that the message was sent to Josiah, -not only by Pharaoh Necho, who had sent to say "The Lord is with me -hastening me forward: depart from me, and be not against the Lord," -but also by "the prophet Jeremy." Josephus frankly ascribes the error -of Josiah to destiny, as though he had been infatuated by the -dementation which the Greeks attributed to Ate.[740] - -This, however, is not likely; for it is clear that Jeremiah, though -not mentioned in the Book of Kings, must have had a strong influence -over the mind of Josiah, whom he loved, whose views he shared, in -whose religious revolution he had taken part. Further, we do not read -of any warning recorded by the prophet himself; and had he uttered -one, it would certainly have been mentioned, when he committed his -prophecies to writing twenty-three years after their commencement. A -warning of which the neglect had led to fatal issues would have been -so decisive a confirmation of Jeremiah's prophetic insight that it -could not have been passed over in silence. - -Indeed, Jeremiah may have shared the conviction which, founded on -imperfect generalisation, perhaps dazzled the unfortunate king to his -ruin. Josiah had accepted the Book of Deuteronomy with the whole -strength of his belief, and the Book of Deuteronomy had proclaimed to -Israel as the reward of faithfulness this promise: "And it shall come -to pass that Jehovah, thy God, shall set thee on high above all the -nations of the earth.... Jehovah shall cause thine enemies which rise -up against thee to be smitten before thy face: they shall come out -against thee one way, and flee before thee seven ways."[741] In the -strength of that promise, Josiah was perhaps saying to himself, in -the language of the Psalms, that Jehovah could not fail to save His -anointed, and dash His enemies to pieces under His feet;[742] in the -language, perhaps, of later days, that the sound of a shaken leaf -should chase them, and they should flee when none pursued.[743] - -Alas! such passages do not apply invariably to our worldly fortunes! -God's promises are general. The individual must be considered apart -from the universal in the region of spiritual and eternal blessings. -In the affairs of earth the wicked often seem to be in prosperity, -while the righteous are overwhelmed by all God's waves and storms. -Further, Josiah evidently received a warning--a warning which -professed to come, and really came, from God[744]--whether uttered by -Pharaoh or by Jeremiah. And in this instance Josiah had sought war; he -had not been forced into it. It was not for him to go out of his way -to champion the cause either of cruel Assyria or vaunting Babylon. - -The result was entire disenchantment. No more disheartening and -disastrous calamity could have happened to the kingdom, which had just -begun to struggle out of the slough of idolatry and humiliation. - -Heedless of the message he had received, strong in mistaken hopes, -Josiah opposed his poor, weak forces to the powerful host of renovated -Egypt. The result was instantaneous ruin.[745] Judah was defeated and -scattered without a blow,--Necho came, saw, conquered. Josiah, -according to the present record of the Chronicles, like Ahab, -"disguised himself"[746] and went into the battle; and as he drove -from rank to rank an Egyptian archer drew a bow at a venture, and -smote him while he was putting his forces in array. The arrow-point -brought conviction too late. Josiah saw his error; he knew that his -own death involved the rout of his army. He sounded a retreat, and -said to his servants, "Bear me away to my travelling chariot, for I am -sore wounded."[747] He died at Megiddo, where his ancestor Ahaziah had -died before him from the arrow-wounds of Jehu's pursuers. His servants -carried him in a chariot dead from Megiddo. The famous plain of -Esdraelon had already witnessed two great victories--that of Barak -over Sisera, and that of Gideon over the Midianites; and one -deplorable defeat--that of Saul by the Philistines. It was now -darkened by a catastrophe even more sad.[748] - -When that chariot, accompanied by its wailing escort, entered the -gates of Jerusalem, with the routed army of Judah behind it, the -feeling of the people must have resembled that of the Athenians when -the news reached them that Lysander had destroyed their whole fleet at -AEgospotami, and the long wail went thrilling up through that sleepless -night from the Peiraeus all along the Makra Teiche to the Parthenon and -the Acropolis. And there followed such a mourning as the land had -never known before. It had begun at Megiddo and Hadadrimmon, leaving -the sad memory of its hopeless intensity. It was renewed at Jerusalem -when they buried the king in his own sepulchre. "The land mourned, -every family apart; the family of the House of David apart, and their -wives apart; the family of the House of Nathan apart, and their wives -apart; the family of the House of Levi apart, and their wives apart; -the family of Shimei apart, and their wives apart; all the families -that remained, every family apart, and their wives apart."[749] "And -all Judah and Jerusalem mourned for Josiah. And Jeremiah lamented for -Josiah: and all the singing men and the singing women spake of Josiah -in their lamentations unto this day, and they were made an institution -in Israel: and, behold, they are written in the Lamentations."[750] -Not even for heroic David, or royal Solomon, or pious Asa, or -prosperous Jehoshaphat had there been so loud a dirge. - -But, alas! there was cause for far deeper sorrow than the loss of a -prince, however able, however beloved. The dead was dead. Natural sorrow -for the bereavement of the people would soon be healed by time, but -behind the passing affliction lay a great fear and a great reaction. - -A great fear,--for now a southern foe was added to the northern. -Jeremiah and other prophets had warned Israel of the peril from the -North. When the Scythian wave "rolled shoreward, struck and was -dissipated," when the source of Assyrian terror seemed to be drying up, -worldlings may have felt inclined to laugh at Jeremiah. But now it was -evident that, sooner or later, the Chaldaeans would be as formidable as -their predecessors, and out of the serpent's egg was breaking forth a -cockatrice. The uncalled-for attempt of Josiah to bar the path of the -new and mighty Pharaoh had also added Egypt to the list of formidable -enemies. For the present the Pharaoh had passed on to the Euphrates; but -whether he returned victorious or defeated, his troops could not but be -a source of danger to the little kingdom, which would henceforth be -helpless between the overwhelming forces of its foes. - -If such were the fears of the timid and the pessimistic, still deeper -was the disheartenment of the faithful. Josiah had been the most -obedient, the most religious, of all the kings of Judah from childhood -upwards. Where, then, were Jehovah's old loving-kindnesses which He -sware unto David in His truth? Had God forgotten to be gracious? Had -He hidden away His mercy in displeasure? Where were the blessings of -the newly discovered Book of the Law, if the curse fell on its most -earnest votary? Where was Huldah's promise that he should be gathered -to his fathers in peace, if he was carried back dead from the field of -fruitless battle? There can be little doubt that the apparent blight -which had fallen on unavailing righteousness hastened the reaction of -the subsequent reigns. Many might be inclined to cry out with even -Jeremiah in his moments of overwhelming despondency, "Ah, Lord God! -surely Thou hast greatly deceived this people and Jerusalem, saying, -'Ye shall have peace'; whereas the sword reacheth unto the soul."[751] -"O Lord, Thou has deceived me, and I was deceived: Thou art stronger -than I, and hast prevailed: I am a derision daily, every one mocketh -me. Whenever I speak, I must shout, I must cry violence and spoil; for -the word of the Lord is made a reproach unto me, and a derision, -daily."[752] - -But man judges partially and judges amiss. God's ways are not as man's -ways. God sees the whole; He sees the future; He sees things as they -are. Through defeat, through captivity, through multiform affliction, -lay the path to the final deliverance of the nation from the grosser -forms of idolatry. When they wept as they remembered Zion, when they -took down their harps from the willows by the water-courses of Babylon -to sing the Lord's song in a strange land, they turned again--and at -last with their whole heart--to God their Saviour, who had done so -great things for them;--until the grey secret lingering in the East -was brightened by the Morning Star, and there was revealed to the -world a True Israel, and a New Jerusalem, wherein the Lord should be -King for evermore. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[728] He was forced to desist by a fearful mortality among the -labourers. - -[729] _Circ._ B.C. 611-605. Herod., ii. 158, 159, iv. 42. Psamatik, -the father of Necho, was perhaps a Lybian. He established his sway -over all Egypt displacing the Assyrians. - -[730] _Antt._, X. v. 1. - -[731] Herod., ii. 158. His father Psamatik had left him an adequate -army of natives and mercenaries. - -[732] Herodotus says of his ships: [Greek: Hai men epi te boreie -thalasse epoiethesan]. - -[733] Judg. iv. 23; 1 Sam. xxix. 1-11; 1 Kings xx. 26; 2 Kings xxiii. -29; 2 Chron. xxxv. 22; Rev. xvi. 16 (Armageddon). Herodotus confuses -it with Migdol ([Greek: Magdolon]). - -[734] 1 Macc. xii. 49; Jos., _Antt._, XIII. vi. 2. - -[735] 2 Chron. xxxv. 20-22. - -[736] According to 1 Esdras i. 25-32, "for upon Euphrates is my war." - -[737] Klostermann, in 2 Chron. xxxv. 21, reads _bachalom_, "in a -dream," instead of "to make haste." - -[738] Gen. xli. 1; Herod., ii. 188; _Records of the Past_, ix. 52. - -[739] 2 Kings xviii. 25. - -[740] _Antt._, X. v. 1: [Greek: Tes pepromenes oimai eis tout' auton -parormesases]. - -[741] Deut. xxviii. 1-8. - -[742] Psalm xx. 6, xviii. 29-50. - -[743] Lev. xxvi. 36. - -[744] 2 Chron. xxxv. 22: "hearkened not _to the words of Necho from -the mouth of God_." - -[745] "When he had _seen_ him." Comp. 2 Kings xiv. 8. - -[746] 1 Esdras i. 25; and LXX., "firmly resolved," "strengthened -himself," as in 2 Chron. xxv. 11. - -[747] Jos., _Antt._, X. v. 1; and 2 Chron. xxxv. 23; 1 Esdras i. 30. - -[748] The fortunes of the Jews again prevailed in this plain in the -days of Holofernes (Judith vii. 3); but they were defeated there by -Placidus (Jos., _B. J._, IV. i. 8). - -[749] Zech. xii. 11-13 (comp. Jer. xxii. 10, 18). No such place as -Hadadrimmon is known, though there is a Rummane not far from Megiddo. -Jerome (_Comm. in Zach._) identifies it with a place which he calls -Maximianopolis. Wellhausen (_Skizzen_, 192) thinks that the mourning -is compared to some wail over the god Hadadrimmon, like the wailing -for Tammuz. Jonathan and Jarchi say that Hadadrimmon was the son of -Tabrimmon, who opposed Ahab at Ramoth-Gilead. - -[750] 2 Chron. xxxv. 24, 25. Jeremiah's elegy has probably perished. -It would have been most interesting had it been preserved. Lam. iv. is -too vague to have been this lost poem. - -[751] Jer. iv. 10. - -[752] Jer. xx. 7, 8. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXIII - - _JEHOAHAZ_ - - B.C. 608 - - 2 KINGS xxiii. 31-33 - - "I went by, and, lo! he was gone: I sought him, but his place - could nowhere be found."--PSALM xxxvii. 36. - -It was under the disastrous circumstances which attended his father's -death at Megiddo that Jehoahaz began to reign. There is some confusion -about the four sons of Josiah, whom the Chronicler calls Johanan, -Jehoiakim, Zedekiah, and Shallum.[753] From Jer. xxii. 11, it appears -that Jehoahaz was the royal name taken on his anointing by Shallum, the -third son.[754] If so, he cannot be identified with Johanan, the -firstborn, as in the margin of our version. Further, it appears from our -historians that Jehoahaz was twenty-three at his succession, and was -therefore younger than Jehoiakim who (three months later) succeeded him -at the age of twenty-five. Jehoahaz was the own brother of Zedekiah, -Jehoiakim being his half-brother by another mother (Zebudah). - -We do not know for what reason he was preferred by "the people of the -land" to his elder brother Eliakim or Jehoiakim. It was probably -because they regarded him as a prince of eminent courage and ability. -The high hopes which the nation conceived of him may be seen in the -pathetic elegy of Ezek. xix.:-- - - "Moreover take thou up a lamentation for the princes of Israel, and - say,-- - What was thy mother? A lioness! - Amidst lions she couched, - In the midst of the young lions she nourished her whelps. - She brought up one of her whelps: he became a young lion; - He learned to catch the prey; he devoured men. - The nations heard of him; - In their pit was he taken,[755] - And they brought him with hooks into the land of Egypt."[756] - -We see, too, that he was to an eminent degree the darling of the -nation in the still more plaintive wail of Jeremiah which will be -quoted later. - -The fact that Shallum solemnly changed his name to Jehoahaz ("Jehovah -taketh hold"),[757] and that the people of the land not only "made him -king in his father's stead," but also "anointed him," points to a -disputed succession.[758] High hopes were conceived of him; but he -hardly had a chance of fulfilling them, for he was only permitted to -reign three months. What were the events of those months we do not -know. Jehoahaz must have disappointed any hopes which may have been -formed of him by the religious party; for dear as he was to them, the -historians record of him that "he did that which was evil in the sight -of the Lord, according to all that his fathers had done," although -they specify no particular offence. The same sad verdict is passed on -all his four successors; but Josephus says even more emphatically of -Jehoahaz that he was impious and impure.[759] - -He must have shown some activity in other respects, or else Ezekiel -would hardly have said that "the nations heard of him," and that "he -learned to catch the prey; he devoured men." Over all his deeds, -whatever they may have been, "the iniquity of oblivion has blindly -scattered her poppy," and he fell a victim to the great -world-movements of those troublous times. - -For Pharaoh, after his defeat of Josiah at Megiddo, proceeded to make -himself master of Syria and Palestine. He took Cadytis, which -Herodotus calls "a large city of Syria,"[760] and which--since it -cannot here mean Gaza, as in Herod., iii. 5--has been identified by -some with Kadesh. Thence he marched to Carchemish, on the right bank -of the Euphrates,[761] none venturing to check him, till "once more, -after the lapse of nine centuries, Egyptian garrisons looked down on -that historic stream."[762] On his return he stopped at Riblah, on -the Orontes,[763] to consolidate his Syrian conquests; and there he -learnt that, without consulting him, the people of Jerusalem had made -Jehoahaz their king. Perhaps he heard enough of the warlike prowess of -Jehoahaz to make him resent this act of independence. After his three -months' campaign he sent for Jehoahaz to Riblah, and the unhappy -prince had no choice but to obey. Possibly the Egyptian party in -Jerusalem, headed by his disappointed elder brother Eliakim, may have -intrigued against him with Pharaoh Necho. When he reached Riblah, he -was unceremoniously deposed; and though we may hope that the -expression of Ezekiel, that "they brought him with _hooks_ into the -land of Egypt," belongs to the metaphor of the captured lion's whelp, -it is certain that he was taken to the banks of the Nile as a fettered -captive, never to return. How long his miserable life was protracted, -or how he was treated in Egypt, we do not know. The sun of the young -prince went down in darkness while it was yet day. No king of Judah -before him had died in prison and in exile, and the calamity smote -heavily the heart of his people. Egypt was not to escape--shortly -thereafter--the doom of violence and pride; but whether the young -Jewish king had died meanwhile of a broken heart, or whether he -dragged on to hoar hairs his maimed life, or whether he was murdered -in his dungeon, no man knew. One thing only was clear to the sad -prophet--that he would never return. - -"Weep ye not for the dead, neither bemoan him: but weep ye sore for -him that is gone away: for he shall return no more, nor see his native -country. For thus saith Jehovah concerning Shallum, the son of Josiah, -King of Judah, which reigned instead of Josiah his father, which went -forth out of this place: 'He shall not return thither any more: but in -the place whither they have led him captive there shall he die, and he -shall see this land no more.'"[764] - -To show his absolute power over Judah and Jerusalem, Pharaoh Necho not -only deposed and fettered their king, but put the whole land under a -yearly tribute of one hundred talents of silver (about L40,000) and a -talent of gold (about L4,000).[765] - -Even this comparatively small sum was a heavy burden for so greatly -afflicted and impoverished a country, and Pharaoh further imposed on -them a vassal to see that it was duly extorted. This was Eliakim, the -eldest living son of Josiah. There was nothing left to plunder in the -Temple or the palace, and therefore the exaction had to be borne by -the taxed and suffering people. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[753] Chron. iii. 15. - -[754] He is named "fourth," but he was older than his brothers -Jehoiakim and Zedekiah (2 Kings xxiii. 31, xxiv. 18). The genealogy is -as follows:-- - - Zebudah = JOSIAH = Hamutal. - | | - ----- |------------------- - | | | - Nehushta = ELIAKIM ZEDEKIAH JEHOAHAZ - | or Jehoiakim. or Mattaniah. or Shallum. - | - JEHOIACHIN. - - -[755] An allusion to the Syrian mode of hunting the lion by driving it -with cries into a concealed pit (Tristram, _Nat. Hist. of the Bible_, -118; Cheyne, 140). - -[756] Ezek. xix. 1-4. - -[757] The name Shallum means "recompense." It may have been regarded -as ill-omened, since the King of Israel who bore this rare name had -only reigned a month. - -[758] The Talmud says that kings were only anointed in special cases -(_Keritoth_, f. 5, 2; Graetz, ii. 328). - -[759] Jos., _Antt._, X. v. 2: [Greek: Asebes kai miaros ton tropon]. - -[760] Herod., ii. 159. - -[761] Mr. G. Smith identifies Carchemish with Jerablus. - -[762] Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, p. 127. - -[763] Comp. 2 Kings xxv. 20, 21. The old Hittite capital of Riblah was -a convenient halting-place on the road between Babylon and Jerusalem. -It was on the northernmost boundary of Palestine towards Damascus -(Amos vi. 14). - -[764] Jer. xxii. 10-12. - -[765] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 3; 1 Esdras i. 36. The smallness of the tribute -proves the impoverishment of the land. Sennacherib demanded from -Hezekiah three hundred talents of silver, and thirty of gold; and -Menahem paid one thousand talents of silver to Tiglath-Pileser. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXIV - - _JEHOIAKIM_ - - B.C. 608-597 - - 2 KINGS xxiii. 36-xxiv. 7 - - "But those things that are recorded of him, and of his uncleanness - and impiety, are written in the Chronicles of the Kings."--1 - ESDRAS i. 42. - - "When Jehoiakim succeeded to the throne, he said, 'My predecessors - knew not how to provoke God.'"--_Sanhedrin_, f. 103, 2. - - "There is no strange handwriting on the wall, - Through all the midnight hum no threatening call, - Nor on the marble floor the stealthy fall - Of fatal footsteps. All is safe.--Thou fool, - The avenging deities are shod with wool!" - W. ALLEN BUTLER. - - -Eliakim succeeded to the throne at the age of twenty-five under very -unenviable circumstances--as a nominal king, a helpless nominee and -tributary of the Pharaoh. He seems to have been thoroughly distasteful -to the people; and if we may judge from the fact that Ezekiel frankly -ignores him and passes from Jehoahaz to Jehoachin, he was regarded as -a tax-gathering usurper nominated by an alien tyrant. For after -speaking of Jehoahaz, Ezekiel says,-- - - "Now when she [Judah] saw that she had waited [for the restoration of - Jehoahaz], and her hope was lost, - Then she took another of her whelps;[766] - A young lion she made him. - He went up and down among the lions; - He became a young lion."[767] - -The historian says that Necho turned the name of Eliakim ("God will -establish") to Jehoiakim ("Jehovah will establish"); but by this can -hardly be meant more than that he sanctioned the change of El into -Jehovah on Eliakim's installation upon the throne. - -Jehoiakim is condemned in the same terms as all the other sons of -Josiah. His misdoings are far more definitely recorded in the -Prophets, who furnish us with details which are passed over by the -historians. Some of his sins may have been due to the influence of his -wife Nehushta, who was a daughter of Elnathan of Achbor, one of the -princes of the heathen party. It was this Elnathan whom the king chose -as a fitting ambassador to demand the extradition of the prophet -Urijah from Egypt. One of the crimes with which Jehoiakim is charged -is the building for himself of a sumptuous palace, and thus vainly -trying to emulate the splendours of Assyrian, Babylonian, and Egyptian -kings. In itself the act would not have been more wicked than it was -in Solomon, whose architectural parade is dwelt upon with enthusiasm. -But the circumstances were now wholly different. Solomon was at that -time in all his glory, the possessor of boundless wealth, the ruler of -an immense and united territory, the head of a powerful and prosperous -people, the successor of an unconquered hero who had gone to his grave -in peace; Jehoiakim, on the other hand, had succeeded a father who -had died in defeat on the field of battle, and a brother who was -hopelessly pining in an Egyptian prison. The Tribes had been carried -into captivity by Assyria; the nation was beaten, oppressed, and poor; -the king himself possessed but a shadow of royalty. In such a -condition of things it would have been his glory to maintain a -watchful and strenuous activity, and to devote himself in simplicity -and self-denial to the good of his people. It showed a perverted and -sensuous mind to insult the misery of his subjects at such a time by -feeble attempts to rival heathen potentates in costly aestheticism. But -this was not all; he carried out his ignoble selfishness at the cost -of oppression and wrong.[768] - -It is possible that the prophet Habakkuk alludes to him in the words:-- - -"Woe to him that getteth an evil gain for his house, that he may set -his nest on high, that he may be delivered from the hand of evil![769] -Thou hast consulted shame to thy house by cutting off many peoples, -and hast sinned against thy soul. For the stone shall cry out of the -wall, and the beam out of the timber shall answer it."[770] - -The thought of the Jewish king's selfish expensiveness may have crossed -the mind of Habakkuk, though the taunt is addressed directly to the -Chaldaeans, and especially to Nebuchadrezzar, who was at that time -revelling in the beautifying of Babylon, and especially of his own -royal palace. On the other hand, the rebuke, or rather the denunciation, -uttered by Jeremiah against the king for this line of conduct, and for -the forced labour which it required, is terribly direct. - - "'Woe unto him that buildeth his house by unrighteousness, - And his chambers by wrong; - That useth his neighbour's service without wages, - And giveth him not his hire; - That saith, "I will build me a wide house and spacious chambers," - And cutteth out windows; - And it is ceiled with cedar, and painted with vermilion. - Shalt thou reign because thou viest with the cedar?[771] - Did not thy father eat and drink, and do judgment and justice? - Then it was well with him! - Was not this to know Me?' saith the Lord. - 'But thine heart is not but for thy dishonest gain, - And for to shed innocent blood, - And for oppression and for violence to do it.'"[772] - -Then follows the stern message of doom which we shall quote hereafter. -The king's bad example stimulated or perhaps emulated similar folly -and want of patriotism on the part of his nobles. They were shepherds -who destroyed and scattered the sheep of Jehovah's pastures. But vain -was their imagined security, and their ostentation. The judgment was -imminent.[773] - -"O inhabitress of Lebanon, that makest thy nest in the cedars," -exclaims the prophet in bitter mockery, "how greatly wilt thou groan -when pangs come upon thee, the pain as of a woman in travail!"[774] - -But Jehoiakim's offences were deadlier than this. The Chronicler -speaks of "the abominations which he did"; and some have therefore -supposed that the evil state of things described by Jeremiah (xix.) -refers to this reign. If so, he plunged into the idolatry which caused -Judah to be shivered like a potter's vessel. Certainly he sinned -grievously against God in the person of His prophets. - -Jeremiah was not the only prophet who disdained the easy and -traitorous popularity which was to be won by prophesying "peace, -peace," when there was no peace. He had for his contemporary another -messenger of God, no less boldly explicit than himself--Urijah, the -son of Shemaiah of Kirjath-Jearim. Jeremiah had as yet only prophesied -in his humble native village of Anathoth; he had not been called upon -to face "the swellings" or "the pride of Jordan."[775] Urijah had been -in the fuller glare of publicity in the capital, and his bold -declaration that Jerusalem should fall before Nebuchadrezzar and the -Chaldaeans had excited such a fury of indignation that he escaped into -Egypt for his life. Surely this should have appeased the rulers, even -if they chose to pay no attention to the Divine menace. For the -prophets were recognised deliverers of the messages of Jehovah; and -with scarcely an exception, even in the most wicked reigns, their -persons had been regarded as sacrosanct. But Jehoiakim would not let -Urijah escape. He sent an embassy to Necho, headed by his -father-in-law Elnathan, son of Achbor, requesting his extradition. -Urijah had been dragged back from Egypt, and, to the horror of the -people, the king had slain him with the sword, and flung his body into -the graves of the common people.[776] What made this conduct more -monstrous was the precedent of Micah the Morasthite. He, in the days -of Hezekiah, had prophesied,-- - - "Zion shall be ploughed as a field, - And Jerusalem shall become heaps, - And the Mountain of the House as the wooded heights."[777] - -Yet so far from putting him to death, or even stirring a finger -against him, the pious king had only been moved to repentance by the -Divine threatenings. Thus the blood of the first martyr-prophet, if we -except the case of Zechariah, had been shed by the son of Judah's most -pious king. Jeremiah himself only narrowly escaped martyrdom. The -precedent of Micah helped to save him, though it had not saved Urijah. -He was far more powerfully protected by the patronage of the princes -and the people. Standing in the Temple court, he had declared that, -unless the nation repented, that house should be like Shiloh, and the -city a curse to all the nations of the earth. Maddened by such words -of bold rebuke, the priests and the prophets and the people had -threatened him with death. But the princes took his part, and some of -the people came over to them. His most powerful protector was Ahikam, -the son of Shaphan, a member of a family of the utmost distinction. - -Meanwhile, we must follow for a time the outward fortunes of the king -and of the world. - -Necho, after his successful advance, had retired to Egypt, and -Jehoiakim continued to be for three years his obsequious servant. An -event of tremendous importance for the world changed the entire -fortunes of Egypt and of Judah. Nineveh fell with a crash which -terrified the nations. We might apply to her the language which Isaiah -applies to her successor, Babylon:-- - -"Sheol from beneath is moved for thee to meet thee at thy coming: it -stirreth up the shades for thee, even the Rephaim of the earth; it -hath raised up from their thrones all the kings of the nations. All -they shall answer and say unto thee, 'Art thou also become weak as we? -art thou become like unto us?' ... All the kings of the nations, all -of them, sleep in glory, every one in his own house. But thou art cast -forth away from thy sepulchre like an abominable branch, as the -raiment of those that are slain, that are thrust through with the -sword, that go down to the stones of the pit.... They that see thee -shall narrowly look upon thee ... and say, 'Is this the man that made -the earth to tremble? that did shake kingdoms? that made the world as -a wilderness, and overthrew the cities thereof? that let not loose his -prisoners to their home?'"[778] - -Yes, Assyria had fallen like some mighty cedar in Libanus, and the -nations gazed without pity and with exultation on his torn and -scattered branches. - -And coincident with the fate of Nineveh had been the rise of the -Chaldaean power. - -Nabupalussur[779] had been a general of one of the last Assyrian kings, -and had been sent by him with an army to quell a Babylonian revolt. -Instead of this, he seized the city and made himself king. When the -final overthrow and obliteration of Nineveh had secured his power, he -sent his brave and brilliant son Nebuchadrezzar[780] (B.C. 605) to -secure the provinces which he had wrested from Assyria, and especially -to regain possession of Carchemish, which commanded the river. - -Necho marched to protect his conquests, and at Carchemish the hostile -forces encountered each other in a tremendous battle,--immemorial -Egypt under the representative of its age-long Pharaohs; Babylon, with -her independence of yesterday, under a prince hitherto unknown, whose -name was to become one of the most famous in the world. The result is -described by Jeremiah (xlvi. 1-12). Egypt was hopelessly defeated. Her -splendidly arrayed warriors were panic-stricken and routed; her chief -heroes were dashed to pieces by the heavy maces of the Babylonians, or -fled without so much as looking back. The scene was one of -"Magor-missabib"--terror on every side.[781] Pharaoh's host came up -like the Nile in flood with its Ethiopian hoplites and Asiatic -archers; but they were driven back. The daughter of Egypt received a -wound which no balm of Gilead could cure. The nations heard of her -shame, and the prophet pronounced her further chastisement by the -hands of Nebuchadrezzar. - -Then, in the fourth year of Jehoiakim, the young Babylonian conqueror -swept down upon Syria and Palestine like a bounding leopard, like an -avenging eagle (Hab. i. 7, 8). Jehoiakim had no choice but to change -his vassalhood to Necho for a vassalage to Nebuchadrezzar.[782] He -might have suffered severe consequences, but tidings came to the young -Chaldaean that his father had ended his reign of twenty-one years and -was dead. For fear lest disturbances might arise in his capital, he at -once dashed home across the desert with some light troops by way of -Tadmor, while he told his general to follow him home through Syria by -the longer route. He seems, however, to have carried away with him -some captives, among whom were Daniel, Ananias, Azarias, and -Misael,[783] destined hereafter for such memorable fortunes. Jehoiakim -himself was thrown into fetters to be carried into Babylon; but the -conqueror changed his mind, and probably thought that it would be -safer for the present to accept his pledges and assurances, and leave -him as his viceroy. "He took an oath of him," says Ezekiel (xvii. 13); -"he took also the mighty of the land."[784] - -For three years this frivolous egotist who occupied the throne of -Judah remained faithful to his covenant with the King of Babylon, but -at the end of that time he rebelled. In this rebellion he was again -deluded by the glamour of Egypt, and reliance on the empty promise of -"horses and much people." Ezekiel openly disapproved of this -policy,[785] and reproached the king for his faithlessness to his -oath. Jeremiah went further, and declared in the plainest language -that "Nebuchadrezzar would certainly come up and destroy this land, -and cause to cease from thence both man and beast."[786] - -Nearer and nearer the danger came. At first the King of Babylon was too -busy to do more than send against the Jewish rebel marauding bands of -Chaldaeans, who acted in concert with the hereditary depredators of -Judah--Syrians, Moabites, and Ammonites. But the prophet knew that the -danger would not end there, believing that God would yet "remove Judah -out of His sight" for the unforgiven sins of Manasseh and the innocent -blood with which he had filled Jerusalem.[787] At last Nebuchadrezzar -had time to turn closer attention to the affairs of Judah, and this -became necessary because of the revolt of Tyre under its King Ithobalus. -In the stress of the peril Jehoiakim proclaimed a fast and a day of -humiliation in the Temple. Jeremiah was at this time "shut up"--either -in hiding, or in some sort of custody. As he could not go and preach in -person, he dictated his prophecy to Baruch, who wrote it on a scroll, -and went in the prophet's place to read it in the Lord's House to the -people there assembled from Jerusalem and all Judah in the chamber of -Gemariah, the son of Shaphan, in the inner court, by the new gate.[788] -Gemariah was the brother of Ahikam, the protector of the prophet. - -No one was more painfully alarmed by Jeremiah's prophecy than Micaiah, -the son of Gemariah, and he thought it his duty to go and tell his -father and the other princes what he had heard. They were assembled in -the scribe's chamber, and sent a courtier of Ethiopian race--Jehudi, -the son of Cushi--bidding him to bring the scroll with him, and to -come to them.[789] - -Baruch was a person of distinction. He was the brother of Seraiah, who -is called in our A.V. "a quiet prince," and in the margin "prince of -Menucha" or "chief chamberlain," literally "master of the -resting-place"; and he was the grandson of Maaseiah, "the governor" of -the city.[790] The office imposed on him by Jeremiah was so perilous -and painful that it nearly broke his heart. He exclaimed to Jeremiah, -"Woe is me now! the Lord hath added grief to my sorrow. I am weary -with my sighing, and I find no rest." The answer which the prophet was -commissioned to give him was very remarkable. It confirmed the -terrible doom on his native land, but added, "'And seekest thou great -things for thyself? Seek them not. For, behold, I will bring evil upon -all flesh,' saith the Lord: 'but thy life will I give unto thee for a -prey in all places whither thou goest.'"[791] - -Baruch obeyed the summons of the princes, and at their request sat -down with them and read the scroll in their ears. When they had heard -the portentous prophecy, they turned shuddering to one another, and -said, "We must tell the king of all these words." They asked Baruch -how he had written them, and he said he had taken them down at the -prophet's dictation. Then, knowing the storm which would burst over -the bold offenders, they said, "Go, hide thee, thou and Jeremiah, and -let no man know where ye be." - -Not daring to imperil the awful document, they laid it up in the -chamber of Elishama, the scribe, but went to the king and told him its -contents. He sent Jehudi to fetch it, and to read it in their hearing. -Jehoiakim and the illustrious company were seated in the -winter-chamber; for it was October, and a fire was burning in the -brazier, where Jehoiakim sat warming himself in the chilly weather. - -As he listened, he was filled not only with fury, but with contempt. -Such a message might well have caused him and his worst counsellors to -rend their clothes; but instead of this they adopted a tone of defiance. -By the time that Jehudi had read three or four columns, Jehoiakim -snatched the scribe's knife which hung at his girdle, and began to cut -up the scroll, with the intention of burning it. Seeing his purpose, -Gemariah, Elnathan, and Seraiah entreated him not to destroy it. But he -would not listen. He flung the fragments into the brazier, and they were -consumed. He ordered his son Jerahmeel,[792] with Seraiah and Shelemiah, -to seize both Baruch and Jeremiah, and bring them before him for -punishment. Doubtless they would have suffered the fate of Urijah, but -"the Lord hid them." There were enough persons of power on their side to -render their hiding-place secure. - -But the king's impious indifference, so far from making any difference -in the things that were, only brought down upon his guilt a fearful -doom. Truth cannot be cut to pieces, or burnt, or mechanically -suppressed. - - "Truth, crushed to earth, shall rise again; - The eternal years of God are hers: - But error, vanquished, writhes in pain, - And dies amid her worshippers." - -All the former denunciations, and new ones added to them, were -rewritten by Jeremiah and his faithful friend in their hiding-place, -and among them these words[793]:-- - -"Thus saith the Lord of Jehoiakim, King of Judah, 'He shall have none -to sit upon the throne of David; and his dead body shall be cast out -in the day to the heat, and in the night to the frost.'" - -A frightful drought added to the misery of this reign, but failed to -bring the wretched king to his senses. Jeremiah describes it[794]:-- - -"Judah mourneth, and the gates thereof languish; they bow down -mourning unto the ground; and the cry of Jerusalem is gone up. And the -nobles send their menials to the waters: they come to the pits, and -find no water; they return with their vessels empty; they are ashamed -and confounded, and cover their heads, because of the ground which is -chapped, for that no rain hath been in the land.... Yea, the hind also -in the field calveth, and forsaketh her young, because there is no -grass. And the wild asses stand on the bare heights, they pant for -air like jackals; their eyes fail, because there is no herbage." - -Even this affliction, so vividly and pathetically described, failed to -waken any repentance. And then the doom fell. Nebuchadrezzar advanced -in person against Jerusalem.[795] Even the hardy nomad Rechabites had -to fly before the Chaldaeans, and to take refuge in the cities which -they hated. The sacred historian tells us nothing as to the manner of -the death of Jehoiakim, only saying that he "slept with his fathers": -his narrative of this period is exceedingly meagre. Josephus says that -Nebuchadrezzar slew him and the flower of the citizens, and sent three -thousand captives to Babylon.[796] Some imagine that he was killed by -the Babylonians in a raid outside the walls of Jerusalem, or "murdered -by his own people, and his body thrown for a time outside the walls." -If so, the Babylonians did not war with the dead. His remains, after -this "burial of an ass,"[797] may have been finally suffered to rest -in a tomb. The Septuagint says (2 Chron. xxxvi. 8) that he was buried -"in Ganosan," by which may be meant the sepulchre of Manasseh in the -garden of Uzza.[798] Not for him was the wailing cry "_Hoi, adon! -Hoi, hodo!_" ("Ah, Lord! Ah, his glory!"). - -"The memory of the wicked shall rot." Certainly this was the case with -Jehoiakim. The Chronicler mysteriously alludes to "his abominations -which he did, _and that which was found in him_."[799] The Rabbis, -interpreting this after their manner, say that "the thing found" was -the name of the demon Codonazor, to whom he had sold himself, which -after his death was discovered legibly written in Hebrew letters on -his skin. "Rabbi Johanan and Rabbi Eleazar debated what was meant by -'that which was found on him.' One said that he tattooed the name of -an idol upon his body ([Hebrew: mtv]), and the other said that he had -tattooed the name of the god Recreon."[800] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[766] Not Jehoiakim, but Jehoiachin, as the sequel shows. - -[767] Ezek. xix. 5-9. The allusions to Jehoiakim by Jeremiah are -numerous, and all unfavourable (xxii. 13-19, xxvi. 20-23, xxxvi. -20-31, etc.) - -[768] Josephus (_Antt._, X. v. 2) is very severe on this king. He says -that "he was unjust in disposition, an evil-doer, neither pious -towards God nor just towards men." - -[769] Perhaps an allusion to a sort of fortified palace on Ophel. - -[770] Hab. ii. 9-11. - -[771] The text is perhaps corrupt. Two MSS. of the LXX. read "because -thou viest _with Ahab_," and the Vatican MSS. has "_with Ahaz_." -Cheyne adopts the former reading. - -[772] Jer. xxii. 13-17. - -[773] Jer. xxiii. 1. - -[774] Jer. xxii. 23. - -[775] Jer. xii. 5. - -[776] Jer. xxvi. 20-23. So far as I am aware, Bunsen stands alone in -identifying Urijah with the "Zechariah" who wrote Zech. xii.-xiv. -Others refer Zech. xii. 10 to the murder of Urijah. - -[777] Jer. xxvi. 18. - -[778] Isa. xiv., _passim_. - -[779] Nabu-pal-ussur, "Nebo protect the son." - -[780] Nabu-kudur-ussur, "Nebo protect the crown" (Schrader, ii. 48), or -"the youth" (Oppert). The portrait of Nebuchadrezzar--this is the proper -spelling, as generally in Jeremiah--is preserved for us on a black cameo -which he presented to the god Merodach. It is now in the Berlin Museum, -and shows strong but not cruel or ignoble characteristics. It is copied -in Riehm's _Handwoerterbuch_, ii. 1067. The Jews, as they were fond of -doing to their enemies, made insulting puns on his name. Thus in the -_Vayyikra Rabba_ (Wuensche, _Bibl. Rabb._) the Three Children are -represented as saying to him, "You are Neboo-cad-netser: bark [_nabach_] -like a dog; swell like a water-jar [_kad_], and chirp like a cricket -[_tsertser_],"--in allusion to his madness. - -[781] Jer. xlvi. 5 (vi. 25). - -[782] Jos., _Antt._, X. xi.; Berosus, p. 11. The Chronicler and -Josephus show some confusion, caused by the similarity of the names -Jehoiakim and Jehoiachin. - -[783] Dan. i. 6. - -[784] We might infer from Ezek. xvii. 12 that Nebuchadrezzar actually -took Jehoiakim with him to Babylon. - -[785] Ezek. xvii. 15. - -[786] Jer. xxxvi. 29, xxv. 9, xxvi. 6. - -[787] 2 Kings xxiv. 2-4. - -[788] Graetz thinks that Jeremiah's roll was substantially Jer. xxv. - -[789] Jos., _Antt._, IX. ix. 1. - -[790] Jer. li. 59. Ewald, Hitzig, and others take the title to mean -"quartermaster" (2 Chron. xxxiv. 8). - -[791] Jer. xlv. 1-5. - -[792] Zeph. i. 8; 1 Kings xxii. 26; Jer. xxxvi. 26, A.V., "The son of -Hammelech." Comp. xxxviii. 6. _Hammelech_ may be a proper name, or a -prince of the blood-royal may be intended. - -[793] "The 'Book,' now as afterwards, was to be the death-blow of the -old regal, aristocratic, sacerdotal exclusiveness. The 'Scribe,' now -first rising into importance in the person of Baruch to supply the -defects of the living Prophet, was, as the printing-press in later -ages, handing on the words of truth, which else might have -irretrievably perished" (Stanley). - -[794] Cheyne, _Jeremiah_, p. 149; Jer. xiv. 1-xv. 9. - -[795] Nebuchadrezzar occupies a larger space in the Bible than any -heathen king, being spoken of in 2 Kings, 2 Chronicles, Ezra, -Nehemiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, and Daniel. - -[796] For further details of Jehoiakim see 1 Esdras i. 38: "He bound -Joakim and the nobles; _but Zaraces_ his brother he apprehended, and -brought him out of Egypt." The allusion is entirely obscure, and -probably arises from some corruption of the text. The literal -rendering is: "And _Joakim_ bound the nobles; but Zaraces his brother -he apprehended, and brought him out of Egypt." Zaraces might be a -corruption for Zedekiah, who was Jehoiakim's half-brother. Some think -that Zaraces is a corruption for Urijah, and "his brother" a clerical -error. - -[797] Jer. xxxvi. 30, xxii. 19. - -[798] LXX., [Greek: kai ekoimethe Ioakeim en Ganozan meta ton pateron -heautou]. - -[799] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 8. - -[800] _Sanhedrin_, f. 104, 2. For another allusion see _id._ 49, 1; -Hershon, _Treasures of the Talmud_, p. 232. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXV - - _JEHOIACHIN_ - - B.C. 597 - - 2 KINGS xxiv. 8-16 - - "There are times when ancient truths become modern falsehoods, - when the signs of God's dispensations are made so clear by the - course of natural events as to supersede the revelations of even - their most sacred past."--STANLEY, _Lectures_, ii. 521. - - -Jehoiachin--"Jehovah maketh steadfast"--who is also called Jeconiah, -and--perhaps with intentional slight--Coniah, succeeded, at the age of -eighteen, to the miserable and distracted heritage of the throne of -Judah. The "eight years old" of the Chronicler must be a clerical -error, for he had a harem. He only reigned for three months; and the -historian pronounces over him, as over all the four kings of the House -of Josiah, the stereotyped condemnation of evil-doing. Was there -anything in the manner in which Josiah had trained his family which -could account for their unsatisfactoriness? In Jehoiachin's case we do -not know what his transgressions were, but perhaps his mother's -influence rendered him as little favourable to the prophetic party as -his brother Jehoiakim had been. For the _Gebirah_ was Nehushta, the -daughter of Elnathan of Jerusalem. Her name means apparently "Brass," -and nothing can be deduced from it; but her father Elnathan was (as -we have seen) the envoy who, by order of Jehoiakim, had dragged back -from Egypt the martyr-prophet Urijah.[801] - -Brief as was his reign of three months and ten days[802]--a hundred -days, like that of his unhappy uncle Jehoahaz--he is largely alluded -to by the contemporary prophets. - -Indignant at the sins and apostasies of Judah, and convinced that her -retribution was nigh at hand, Jeremiah took with him an earthen pot to -the Valley of Hinnom, and there shivered it to pieces at Tophet in the -presence of certain elders of the people and of the priests, -explaining that his symbolic action indicated the destruction of -Jerusalem. On hearing the tenor of these prophecies, the priest -Pashur, who was officer of the Temple, smote Jeremiah in the face, and -put him in the stocks in a prominent place by the Temple gate.[803] -Jeremiah in return prophesied that Pashur and all his family should be -carried into captivity, so that his name should be changed from Pashur -to Magor-Missabib, "Terror on every side." - -Against the king himself he pronounced the doom: "'As I live,' saith the -Lord, 'though Coniah, the son of Jehoiakim, King of Judah, were the -signet on My right hand, yet will I pluck thee thence; and I will give -thee into the hands of them that seek thy life, ... even into the hand -of Nebuchadrezzar.... And I will hurl thee, and thy mother that bare -thee, into another country;[804] ... and there shall ye die.' ... Is -this man Coniah a despised broken piece of work? is he a vessel wherein -is no pleasure? wherefore are they hurled, he and his seed, and cast -into a land which they know not? O land, land, land! hear the word of -the Lord. Thus saith the Lord, 'Write ye this man childless, a man that -shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, -sitting upon the throne of David, or ruling any more in Judah.'" - -Yet there must have been something in Jeconiah which impressed -favourably the minds of men. Brief as was his reign, his memory was -never forgotten. We learn from the _Mishna_ that one of the gates of -Jerusalem--probably that by which he left the city--for ever bore his -name.[805] Josephus says that his captivity was annually commemorated. -Jeremiah writes in the Lamentations:-- - -"Our pursuers are swifter than the eagles of heaven: they have pursued -us upon the mountains, they have laid wait for us in the wilderness. -The breath of our nostrils, the anointed of the Lord, was taken in -their pits, of whom we said, 'Under his shadow we shall live among the -heathen.'" - -Ezekiel compares him to a young lion:-- - -"He went up and down among the lions, he became a young lion, and -learned to catch the prey. And he knew their palaces, and laid waste -their cities; and the land was desolate, and the fulness thereof, by -the noise of his roaring. Then the nations set against him on every -side from the provinces, and spread their net over him: he was taken -in their pit. And they put him in ward in hooks, and brought him to -the King of Babylon: they brought him into holds, that his voice -should no more be heard upon the mountains of Israel."[806] - -A prince of whom a contemporary prophet could thus write was obviously -no _faineant_. Indeed, the energetic measures which Nebuchadrezzar -adopted against him may have been due to the fact that he had -endeavoured to rouse his discouraged people. But what could he do -against such a power as that of the Chaldaeans? Nebuchadrezzar sent his -generals against Jerusalem; and when it was ripe for capture, advanced -in person to take possession of it. Resistance had become hopeless; -there lay no chance in anything but that complete submission which -might possibly avert the worst effects of the destruction of the city. -Accordingly, Jeconiah, accompanied by his mother, his court, his -princes, and his officers, went out in procession, and threw -themselves on the mercy of the King of Babylon. Nebuchadrezzar was far -less brutal than the Sargons and Assurbanipals of Assyria; but Judah -had twice revolted, and the defection of Tyre showed him that the -affairs of Palestine could no longer be neglected. He thoroughly -despoiled the Temple and the palace, and carried the spoils to -Babylon, as Isaiah had forewarned Hezekiah should be the case.[807] -That he might further weaken and humiliate the city, he stripped it -of its king, its royal house, its court, its nobles, its soldiers, -even its craftsmen and smiths, and carried ten thousand eight hundred -and thirty-two captives to Babylon (Jos., _Antt._, X. vii. 1), among -whom was the prophet Ezekiel. He naturally spared Jeremiah, who -regarded him as "the sword of Jehovah" (Jer. xlvii. 6), and as -"Jehovah's servant, to do His pleasure" (Jer. xxv. 9, xxvii. 6, xliii. -10). On the whole, Nebuchadrezzar is not treated with abhorrence by -the Jews. There was something in his character which inspired respect; -and the Jews deal with him leniently, both in their records and -generally in their traditions. "Nebuchadnezzar," we read in the Talmud -(_Taanith_ f. 18, 2), "was a worthy king, and deserved that a miracle -should be performed through him." - -From the allusion of Ezekiel we might infer that Jehoiachin was -violent and self-willed; but Josephus speaks of his kindness and -gentleness.[808] Was he, as Jeremiah had prophesied, literally -"childless"?[809] It is true that in 1 Chron. iii. 17, 18, eight sons -are ascribed to him, and among them Shealtiel, in whom the royal line -was continued. But it is far from certain that these sons were not the -sons of his brother Neri, of the House of Nathan,[810] and it seems -that they were only adopted by the unhappy captive. The Book of Baruch -describes him weeping by the Euphrates.[811] But if we may trust the -story of Susannah, his outward fortunes were peaceful, and he was -allowed to live in his own house and gardens in peace, and in a -certain degree of splendour.[812] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[801] Jer. xxvi. 22. - -[802] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 9. - -[803] Jer. xx. 2. There seem to have been special "stocks" and "collars" -in the Temple, reserved, by order of the priest Jehoiada, for those whom -the priests regarded as unruly prophets (Jer. xxix. 26). - -[804] Jer. xxii. 24-30. The captivity of the queen-mother struck men's -imaginations (Jer. xxix. 2). - -[805] _Middoth_, ii. 6, quoted by Cheyne, p. 163; Jos., _B. J._, VI. -ii. 1. Comp. Ezek. i. 2. - -[806] Ezek. xix. 6-9. The special allusions are no longer certain. - -[807] 2 Kings xx. 17. The expression "_he cut to pieces_ all the -vessels of gold which Solomon had made" is hardly consistent with Ezra -i. 7-11, unless we understand the word in a loose sense. - -[808] He says that he nobly gave himself up to save the city (_Antt._, -X. vii. 1). His captivity was made an era from which to date Ezek. i. -2, viii. 1, xxiv. 1, xxvi. 1, etc. Comp. Susannah 1-4. - -[809] Jer. xxii. 30, '_ariri_. His "son" Assir (1 Chron. iii. 17) may -have been made an eunuch (Isa. xxxix. 7). - -[810] Luke iii. 27, 31; Matt. i. 12. - -[811] Baruch i. 3, 4. - -[812] The favourable notice of Nebuchadrezzar in _Taanith_ (quoted -above) is not found in _Berachoth_, f. 57, 2, where he is called "the -wicked." There are many wild legends about him. In _Nedarim_ (f. 65, -2), R. Yitzchak says: "May melted gold be poured into the mouth of the -wicked Nebuchadrezzar! Had not an angel struck him on the mouth, he -would have outshone all David's songs and praises." With reference to -Isa. xxii. 1, 2, the Rabbis say that Jeconiah went to the Temple roof, -and flung up the keys into the air, when Nebuchadrezzar required them: -"a hand took them, and they were seen no more" (_Shekalim_, vi. 5). In -_Nedarim_ (f. 65, 2) we are told that Zedekiah's rebellion consisted -in divulging, contrary to his oath, that he had seen Nebuchadrezzar -eating a live hare (Hershon, _Treasures of the Talmud_). - - - - - CHAPTER XXXVI - - _ZEDEKIAH, THE LAST KING OF JUDAH_ - - B.C. 597-586 - - 2 KINGS xxiv. 18-xxv. 7 - - "Quand ce grand Dieu a choisi quelqu'un pour etre l'instrument de - ses desseins rien n'arrete le cours, ou il enchaine, ou il - aveugle, ou il dompte tout ce qui est capable de resistance." - BOSSUET, _Oraison funebre de Henriette Marie_. - - -When Jehoiachin was carried captive to Babylon, never to return, his -uncle Mattaniah ("Jehovah's gift"), the third son of Josiah, was put -by Nebuchadrezzar in his place. In solemn ratification of the new -king's authority, the Babylonian conqueror sanctioned the change of -his name to Zedekiah ("Jehovah's righteousness").[813] He was -twenty-one at his accession, and he reigned eleven years. - -"Behold," writes Ezekiel, "the King of Babylon came to Jerusalem, and -took the king thereof, and the princes thereof, and brought them to -him to Babylon; and he took of the seed royal" (_i.e._, Zedekiah), -"_and made a covenant with him; he also brought him under an oath: and -took away the mighty of the land, that the kingdom might be base, that -it might not lift itself up, but that by keeping of his covenant it -might stand_."[814] - -Perhaps by this covenant Zechariah meant to emphasise the meaning of -his name, and to show that he would reign in righteousness. - -The prophet at the beginning of the chapter describes Nebuchadrezzar -and Jehoiachin in "a riddle." - -"A great eagle," he says, "with great wings and long pinions, full of -feathers, which had divers colours, came unto Lebanon, and took the -top of the cedar" (Jehoiachin): "he cropped off the topmost of the -young twigs thereof, and carried it into a land of traffic; he set it -in a city of merchants. He took also of the seed of the land" -(Zedekiah), "and planted it in a fruitful soil; he placed it beside -great waters, he set it as a willow tree. And it grew, and became a -spreading vine of low stature, whose branches turned towards him, and -the roots thereof were under him: so it became a vine, and brought -forth branches, and shot forth sprigs."[815] - -The words refer to the first three years of Zedekiah's reign, and they -imply, consistently with the views of the prophets, that, if the weak -king had been content with the lowly eminence to which God had called -him, and if he had kept his oath and covenant with Babylon, all might -yet have been well with him and his land. At first it seemed likely to -be so; for Zedekiah wished to be faithful to Jehovah. He made a -covenant with all the people to set free their Hebrew slaves. Alas! it -was very shortlived. Self-sacrifice cost something, and the princes -soon took back the discarded bondservants.[816] What made this conduct -the more shocking was that their covenant to obey the law had been -made in the most solemn manner by "cutting a calf in twain, and -passing between the severed halves."[817] But the weak king was -perfectly powerless in the hands of his tyrannous aristocracy.[818] - -The exiles in Babylon were now the best and most important section of -the nation. Jeremiah compares them to good figs; while the remnant at -Jerusalem were bad and withered. He and Ezekiel raised their voices, -as in strophe and antistrophe, for the teaching alike of the exiles -and of the remnant left at Jerusalem, for whom the exiles were bidden -to entreat God in prayer. Zedekiah himself made at least one journey -northward, either voluntarily or under summons, to renew his oath and -reassure Nebuchadrezzar of his fidelity.[819] He was accompanied by -Seraiah, the brother of Baruch, who was privately entrusted by -Jeremiah with a prophecy of the fall of Babylon, which he was to fling -into the midst of the Euphrates.[820] - -The last King of Judah seems to have been weak rather than wicked. He -was a reed shaken by the wind. He yielded to the influence of the last -person who argued with him; and he seems to have dreaded above all -things the personal ridicule, danger, and opposition which it was his -duty to have defied. Yet we cannot withhold from him our deep -sympathy; for he was born in terrible times--to witness the -death-throes of his country's agony, and to share in them. It was no -longer a question of independence, but only of the choice of -servitudes. Judah was like a silly and trembling sheep between two -huge beasts of prey.[821] - -Only thus can we account for the strange apostasies--"the abominations -of the heathen"--with which he permitted the Temple to be polluted; and -for the ill-treatment which he allowed to be inflicted on Jeremiah and -other prophets, to whom in his heart he felt inclined to listen. - -What these abominations were we read with amazement in the eighth -chapter of Ezekiel. The prophet is carried in vision to Jerusalem, and -there he sees the Asherah--"the image which provoketh to -jealousy"--which had so often been erected and destroyed and re-erected. -Then through a secret door he sees creeping things, and abominable -beasts, and the idol-blocks of the House of Israel portrayed upon the -wall, while several elders of Israel stood before them and adored, with -censers in their hands--among whom he must specially have grieved to see -Jaazaneiah, the son of Shaphan,[822] flattering himself, as did his -followers, that in that dark chamber Jehovah saw them not. Next at the -northern gate he sees Zion's daughters weeping for Tammuz, or Adonis. -Once more, in the inner court of the Temple, between the porch and the -altar, he sees about twenty-five men with their backs to the altar, and -their faces to the east; and they worshipped the sun towards the east; -and, lo! they put the vine branch to their nose.[823] Were not these -crimes sufficient to evoke the wrath of Jehovah, and to alienate His ear -from prayers offered by such polluted worshippers? Egypt, Assyria, -Syria, Chaldaea, all contributed their idolatrous elements to the -detestable syncretism; and the king and the priests ignored, permitted, -or connived at it.[824] This must surely be answered for. How could it -have been otherwise? The king and the priests were the official -guardians of the Temple, and these aberrations could not have gone on -without their cognisance. There was another party of sheer formalists, -headed by men like the priest Pashur, who thought to make talismans of -rites and shibboleths, but had no sincerity of heart-religion.[825] To -these, too, Jeremiah was utterly opposed. In his opinion Josiah's -reformation had failed. Neither Ark, nor Temple, nor sacrifice were -anything in the world to him in comparison with true religion. All the -prophets with scarcely one exception are anti-ritualists; but none more -decidedly so than the prophet-priest. His name is associated in -tradition with the hiding of the Ark, and a belief in its ultimate -restoration; yet to Jeremiah, apart from the moral and spiritual truths -of which it was the material symbol, the Ark was no better than a wooden -chest. His message from Jehovah is, "I will give you pastors according -to My heart, ... and they shall say no more, 'The Ark of the Covenant of -the Lord': neither shall it come to mind; neither shall they remember -it; neither shall they miss it; neither shall it be made any more."[826] - -Doom followed the guilt and folly of king, priests, and people. If -political wisdom were insufficient to show Zedekiah that the necessities -of the case were an indication of God's will, he had the warnings of the -prophets constantly ringing in his ears, and the assurance that he must -remain faithful to Nebuchadrezzar. But he was in fear of his own princes -and courtiers. A combined embassy reached him from the kings of Edom, -Ammon, Moab, Tyre and Sidon, urging him to join in a league against -Babylon.[827] This embassy was supported by a powerful party in -Jerusalem. Their solicitations were rendered more plausible by the -recent accession (B.C. 590) of the young and vigorous Pharaoh -Hophrah--the Apries of Herodotus[828]--to the throne of Egypt, and by -the recrudescence of that incurable disease of Hebrew politics, a -confidence in the idle promises of Egypt to supply the confederacy with -men and horses.[829] In vain did Jeremiah and Ezekiel uplift their -warning voices. The blind confidence of the king and of the nobles was -sustained by the flattering visions and promises of false prophets, -prominent among whom was a certain Hananiah, the son of Azur, of Gibeon, -"the prophet."[830] To indicate the futility of the contemplated -rebellion, Jeremiah had made "throngs and poles" with yokes, and had -sent them to the kings, whose embassy had reached Jerusalem, with a -message of the most emphatic distinctness, that Nebuchadrezzar was God's -appointed servant, and that they must serve him till God's own appointed -time. If they obeyed this intimation, they would be left undisturbed in -their own lands; if they disobeyed it, they would be scourged into -absolute submission by the sword, the famine, and the pestilence. -Jeremiah delivered the same oracle to his own king.[831] - -The warning was rendered unavailing by the conduct of Hananiah. He -prophesied that within two full years God would break the yoke of the -King of Babylon; and that the captive Jeconiah, and the nobles, and -the vessels of the House of the Lord would be brought back. Jeremiah, -by way of an acted parable, had worn round his neck one of his own -yokes. Hananiah, in the Temple, snatched it off, broke it to pieces, -and said, "So will I break the yoke of Nebuchadrezzar from the neck of -all nations within the space of two full years."[832] - -We can imagine the delight, the applause, the enthusiasm with which -the assembled people listened to these bold predictions. Hananiah -argued with them, to speak, in shorthand, for he appealed to their -desires and to their prejudices. It is always the tendency of nations -to say to their prophets, "Say not unto us hard things: speak smooth -things; prophesy deceits." - -Against Hananiah personally there seems to have been no charge, except -that in listening to the lying spirit of his own desires he could not -hear the true message of God. But he did not stand alone.[833] Among -the children of the captivity, his promises were echoed by two -downright false prophets, Ahab and Zedekiah, the son of Maaseiah, who -prophesied lies in God's name. They were men of evil life, and a -fearful fate overtook them. Their words against Babylon came to the -ears of Nebuchadrezzar, and they were "roasted in the fire," so that -the horror of their end passed into a proverb and a curse.[834] Truly -God fed these false prophets with wormwood, and gave them poisonous -water to drink.[835] - -After the action of Hananiah, Jeremiah went home stricken and ashamed: -apparently he never again uttered a public discourse in the Temple. It -took him by surprise; and he was for the moment, perhaps, daunted by -the plausive echo of the multitude to the lying prophet. But when he -got home the answer of Jehovah came: "Go and tell Hananiah, Thou hast -broken the yokes of wood; but thou hast made for them yokes of iron. I -have put a yoke of iron on the necks of all these nations, that they -may serve Nebuchadrezzar. Hear now, Hananiah, The Lord hath not sent -thee: thou makest this people to trust in a lie. Behold, this year -thou shalt die, because thou hast spoken revolt against the Lord. What -hath the chaff to do with the wheat? saith the Lord."[836] - -Two months after Hananiah lay dead, and men's minds were filled with -fear. They saw that God's word was indeed as a fire to burn, and as a -hammer to dash in pieces.[837] But meanwhile Zedekiah had been -over-persuaded to take the course which the true prophets had -forbidden. Misled by the false prophets and mincing prophetesses whom -Ezekiel denounced,[838] who daubed men's walls with whitened plaster, -he had sent an embassy to Pharaoh Hophrah, asking for an army of -infantry and cavalry to support his rebellion from Assyria.[839] In -the eyes of Jeremiah and Ezekiel the crime did not only consist in -defying the exhortations of those whom Zedekiah knew to be Jehovah's -accredited messengers. In mitigation of this offence he might have -pleaded the extreme difficulty of discriminating the truth amid the -ceaseless babble of false pretenders.[840] But, on the other hand, he -had broken the solemn oath which he had taken to Nebuchadrezzar in the -name of God, and the sacred covenant which he seems to have twice -ratified with him.[841] This it was which raised the indignation of -the faithful, and led Ezekiel to prophesy:-- - - "Shall he prosper? - Shall he escape that doeth such things? - Or shall he break the covenant and be believed? - 'As I live,' saith the Lord God, 'surely in the place where the king - dwelleth that made him king, - Whose oath he despised and whose covenant he broke, - Even with him in the midst of Babylon, shall he die.'"[842] - -Sad close for a dynasty which had now lasted for nearly five centuries! - -As for Pharaoh, he too was an eagle, as Nebuchadrezzar was--a great -eagle with great wings and many feathers, but not so great. The -trailing vine of Judah bent her roots towards him, but it should -wither in the furrows when the east wind touched it.[843] - -The result of Zedekiah's alliance with Egypt was the intermission of -his yearly tribute to Assyria; and at last, in the ninth year of -Zedekiah, Nebuchadrezzar was aroused to put down this Palestinian -revolt, supported as it was by the vague magnificence of Egypt. -Jeremiah had said, "Pharaoh, the King of Egypt, is but a noise [or -desolation]: he hath passed the time appointed."[844] - -This was about the year 589. In 598 Nebuchadrezzar had carried -Jehoachin into captivity, and ever since then some of his forces had -been engaged in the vain effort to capture Tyre, which still, after a -ten years' siege, drew its supplies from the sea, and remained -impregnable on her island rock. He did not choose to raise this -long-continued siege by diverting the troops to beleaguer so strong a -fortress as Jerusalem, and therefore he came in person from Babylon. - -In Ezek. xxi. 20-24 we have a singular and vivid glimpse of his march. -On his way he came to a spot where two roads branched off before him. -One led to Rabbath, the capital of Ammon, on the east of Jordan; the -other to Jerusalem, on the west. Which road should he take? Personally, -it was a matter of indifference; so he threw the burden of -responsibility upon his gods by leaving the decision to the result of -belomancy.[845] Taking in his hand a sheaf of brightened arrows, he held -them upright, and decided to take the route indicated by the fall of the -greater number of arrows. He confirmed his uncertainty by consulting -teraphim, and by hepatoscopy--_i.e._, by examining the liver of slain -victims. Rabbath and the Ammonites were not to be spared, but it was -upon the covenant-breaking king and city that the first vengeance was -to fall.[846] And this is what the prophet has to say to Zedekiah:-- - -"And thou, O deadly-wounded wicked one, the prince of Israel, whose -day is come in the time of the iniquity of the end; thus saith the -Lord God, 'Remove the mitre, and take off the crown. This shall be not -thus. Exalt the low, and abase that which is high. An overthrow, -overthrow, overthrow, will I make it: this also shall be no more, -until He come whose right it is: and I will give it Him."[847] - -So (B.C. 587) Jerusalem was delivered over to siege, even as Ezekiel -had sketched upon a tile.[848] It was to be assailed in the old -Assyrian manner--as we see it represented in the British Museum -bas-relief, where Sennacherib is portrayed in the act of besieging -Lachish--with forts, mounds, and battering-rams; and Ezekiel had also -been bidden to put up an iron plate between him and his pictured city, -to represent the mantelet from behind which the archers shot. - -In this dread crisis Zedekiah sent Zephaniah, the son of Maaseiah, the -priest, and Jehucal, to Jeremiah, entreating his prayers for the -city,[849] for he had not yet been put in prison. Doubtless he prayed, -and at first it looked as if deliverance would come. Pharaoh Hophrah -put in motion the Egyptian army with its Carian mercenaries and -Soudanese negroes, and Nebuchadrezzar was sufficiently alarmed to -raise the siege and go to meet the Egyptians. The hopes of the people -probably rose high, though multitudes seized the opportunity to fly -to the mountains.[850] The circumstances closely resembled those under -which Sennacherib had raised the siege of Jerusalem to go to meet -Tirhakah the Ethiopian; and perhaps there were some, and the king -among them, who looked that such a wonder might be vouchsafed to him -through the prayers of Jeremiah as had been vouchsafed to Hezekiah -through the prayers of Isaiah. Not for a moment did Jeremiah encourage -these vain hopes. To Zephaniah, as to an earlier deputation from the -king, when he sent Pashur with him to inquire of the prophet, Jeremiah -returned a remorseless answer. It is too late. Pharaoh shall be -defeated; even if the Chaldaean army were smitten, its wounded soldiers -would suffice to besiege and burn Jerusalem, and take into captivity -the miserable inhabitants after they had suffered the worst horrors of -a besieged city.[851] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[813] Comp. Jer. xxiii. 6: Jehovah-Tsidkenu. - -[814] Ezek. xvii. 12-14. - -[815] Ezek. xvii. 1-6. - -[816] Jer. xxxiv. 8-11. - -[817] Jer. xxxiv. 19. Comp. Gen. xv. 17. - -[818] This is strikingly shown by his piteous remark to them in Jer. -xxxviii. 5. - -[819] He first sent two of Jeremiah's friends, Elasah and Gemariah, -the son of Shaphan. - -[820] Some critics have doubted the authenticity of Jer. li., lii. - -[821] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 14-21; Stanley, ii. 528; Milman, i. 394. - -[822] Shaphan's other sons, Gemariah, Ahikam, Elasah, and his grandson -Gedaliah, were friends of Jeremiah. - -[823] Ezek. viii. 17. The allusion seems to be to a custom like that -of the Parsees, who hold a branch of tamarisk or pomegranate twigs -(called _barsom_) before their mouths when they adore the sacred fire. -Strabo, xv. 732; Spiegel, _Zendavesta_, ii., p. lxviii; _Eran. -Alterthumsk._, iii. 571 (Orelli, _ad loc._). Lightfoot explains it, -"add fuel to their wrath." - -[824] Ezek. xvi. 15-34. - -[825] Jer. vii. 4, 21-28, viii. 8, xxiii. 31-33, xxxi. 33, 34. - -[826] Jer. iii. 15, 16. - -[827] Jer. xxvii. 3. - -[828] Herod., ii. 161. - -[829] Psammis, the son of Necho, only reigned six years; Hophrah (B.C. -594) was his son. - -[830] The LXX. calls him "the false prophet." - -[831] Jer. xxvii. 1-8, 12-18. On vv. 16-22 see the LXX. - -[832] Here (Jer. xxviii. 11, and in xxxiv. 1, xxxix. 5) the name is -written "Nebuchadnezzar"; everywhere else in Jeremiah it is -"Nebuchadrezzar." - -[833] Part of his dispute with Jeremiah turned on the recovery or -non-recovery of the Temple vessels. Zedekiah is said to have given a -set of silver vessels to replace the old ones (Baruch i. 8). - -[834] Jer. xxix. 21-23. - -[835] Jer. xxiii. 9-32. - -[836] Jer. xxviii. 13-16, xxiii. 28. - -[837] Jer. xxiii. 29. - -[838] Ezek. xiii. 1-23. - -[839] Ezek. xvii. 25. - -[840] Josephus rightly attributes the unfortunate career of Zedekiah -to the weakness with which he listened to evil counsellors, and to the -insolent multitude. - -[841] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 13; Jer. lii. 3. - -[842] Ezek. xvii. 15, 16, 18, 19. - -[843] Ezek. xvii. 7-10. - -[844] Jer. xlvi. 17. - -[845] Another form of belomancy is still commonly practised among the -Arabs. Three arrows are placed in a vessel: on one of them is written, -"My God permits me"; on another, "My God forbids me"; the third is -blank. They are then shaken, and the decision is guided by the one -which falls out first. Comp. Homer, _Iliad_, iii. 316; _Speaker's -Commentary_, _ad loc._ - -[846] Ezek. xxi. 28-32. - -[847] An allusion to the restoration of Jeconiah or his descendants, -and to the far-off Messiah, meek and lowly. - -[848] Ezek. iv. 1-3. - -[849] Jer. xxxvii. 3. - -[850] Ezek. vii. 16. - -[851] Jer. xxi. 1-10, xxxvii. 1-17. Josephus says that Pharaoh was -defeated (_Antt._, X. vii. 3). Jeremiah merely says that he and his -army returned to their own land. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXVII - - _JEREMIAH AND HIS PROPHECIES_ - - JER. i. 1-v. 31 - - "Count me o'er earth's chosen heroes--they were souls that - stood alone, - While the men they agonised for hurled the contumelious - stone; - Stood serene, and down the future saw the golden beam incline - To the side of perfect justice, mastered by their faith - divine, - By one man's plain truth to manhood and to God's supreme - design." - LOWELL. - - -Truly Jeremiah was a prophet of evil. The king might have addressed -him in the words with which Agamemnon reproaches Kalchas.[852] - - "Augur accursed! denouncing mischief still: - Prophet of plagues, for ever boding ill! - Still must that tongue some wounding message bring, - And still thy priestly pride provoke thy king." - -Never was there a sadder man.[853] Like Phocion, he believed in the -enemies of his country more than he believed in his own people. He saw -"Too late" written upon everything. He saw himself all but universally -execrated as a coward, as a traitor, as one who weakened the nerves -and damped the courage of those who were fighting against fearful -odds for their wives and children, the ashes of their fathers, their -altars, and their hearths. It had become his fixed conviction that any -prophets--and there were a multitude of them--who prophesied peace -were false prophets, and _ipso facto_ proved themselves conspirators -against the true well-being of the land.[854] In point of fact, -Jeremiah lived to witness the death-struggle of the idea of religion -in its predominantly national character (vii. 8-16, vi. 8). "The -continuity of the national faith refused to be bound up with the -continuance of the nation. When the nation is dissolved into -individual elements, the continuity and ultimate victory of the true -faith depends on the relations of Jehovah to individual souls out of -which the nation shall be bound up."[855] - -And now a sad misfortune happened to Jeremiah. His home was not at -Jerusalem, but at Anathoth, though he had long been driven from his -native village by the murderous plots of his own kindred, and of those -who had been infuriated by his incessant prophecies of doom. When the -Chaldaeans retired from Jerusalem to encounter Pharaoh, he left the -distressed city for the land of Benjamin, "to receive his portion from -thence in the midst of the people"--apparently, for the sense is -doubtful, to claim his dues of maintenance as a priest. But at the -city gate he was arrested by Irijah, the son of Shelemiah, the captain -of the watch, who charged him with the intention of deserting to the -Chaldaeans. Jeremiah pronounced the charge to be a lie; but Irijah took -him before the princes, who hated him, and consigned him to dreary and -dangerous imprisonment in the house of Jonathan the scribe. In the -vaults of this "house of the pit" he continued many days.[856] The -king sympathised with him: he would gladly have delivered him, if he -could, from the rage of the princes; but he did not dare.[857] - -Meanwhile, the siege went on, and the people never forgot the anguish -of despair with which they waited the reinvestiture of the city. Ever -since that day it has been kept as a fast--the fast of Tebeth. -Zedekiah, yearning for some advice, or comfort--if comfort were to be -had--from the only man whom he really trusted, sent for Jeremiah to -the palace, and asked him in despicable secrecy, "Is there any word -from the Lord?" The answer was the old one: "Yes! Thou shalt be -delivered into the hands of the King of Babylon." Jeremiah gave it -without quailing, but seized the opportunity to ask on what plea he -was imprisoned. Was he not a prophet? Had he not prophesied the return -of the Chaldaean host? Where now were all the prophets who had -prophesied peace? Would not the king at least save him from the -detestable prison in which he was dying by inches? - -The king heard his petition, and he was removed to a better prison in -the court of the watch, where he received his daily piece of bread out -of the bakers' street until all the bread in the city was spent. - -For now utter famine came upon the wretched Jews, to add to the -horrors and accidents of the siege. If we would know what that famine -was in its appalling intensity, we must turn to the Book of -Lamentations. Those elegies, so unutterably plaintive, may not be by -the prophet himself, but only by his school; but they show us what was -the frightful condition of the people of Jerusalem before and during -the last six months of the siege. "The sword of the wilderness"--the -roving and plundering Bedouin--made it impossible to get out of the -city in any direction. Things were as dreadfully hopeless as they had -been in Samaria when it was besieged by Benhadad.[858] Hunger and -thirst reduce human nature to its most animal conditions. They -obliterate the merest elements of morality. They make men like beasts, -and reveal the ferocity which is never quite dead in any but the -purest and loftiest souls. They arouse the least human instincts of -the aboriginal animal. The day came when there was no more bread left -in Jerusalem.[859] The fair and ruddy Nazarites, who had been purer -than snow, whiter than milk, more ruddy than corals, lovely as -sapphires, became like withered boughs,[860] and even their friends -did not recognise them in those ghastly and emaciated figures which -crept about the streets. The daughters of Zion, more cruel in their -hunger than the very jackals, lost the instincts of pity and -motherhood. Mothers and fathers devoured their own little unweaned -children.[861] There was parricide as well as infanticide in the -horrible houses. They seemed to plead that none could blame them, -since the lives of many had become an intolerable anguish, and no man -had bread for his little ones, and their tongues cleaved to the roof -of their mouth. All that happened six centuries later, during the -siege of Jerusalem by Titus, happened now. Then Martha the daughter of -Nicodemus ben-Gorion, once a lady of enormous wealth, was seen picking -the grains of corn from the offal of the streets; now the women who -had fed delicately and been brought up in scarlet were seen sitting -desolate on heaps of dung.[862] And Jehovah did not raise His hand to -save His guilty and dying people. It was too late! - -And as is always the case in such extremities, there were men who stood -defiant and selfish amid the universal misery. Murder, oppression, and -luxury continued to prevail. The godless nobles did not intermit the -building of their luxurious houses, asserting to themselves and others -that, after all, the final catastrophe was not near at hand. The sudden -death of one of them--Pelatiah, the son of Benaiah--while Ezekiel was -prophesying, terrified the prophet so much that he flung himself on his -face and cried with a loud voice, "Ah, Lord God! wilt Thou make a full -end of the remnant of Israel?" But on the others this death by the -visitation of God seems to have produced no effect; and the glory of God -left the city, borne away upon its cherubim-chariot.[863] - -Even under the stress of these dreadful circumstances the Jews held -out with that desperate tenacity which has often been shown by nations -fighting behind strong walls for their very existence, but by no -nation more decidedly than by the Jews. And if the rebel-party, and -the lying prophets who had brought the city to this pass, still -entertained any hopes either of a diversion caused by Pharaoh -Hophrah, or of some miraculous deliverance such as that which had -saved the city from Sennacherib years earlier, it is not unnatural -that they should have regarded Jeremiah with positive fury. For he -still continued to prophesy the captivity. What specially angered them -was his message to the people that all who remained in Jerusalem -should die by the sword, the famine, and the pestilence, but that -those who deserted to the Chaldaeans should live. It was on the ground -of his having said this that they had imprisoned him as a deserter; -and when Pashur and his son Gedaliah heard that he was still saying -this, they and the other princes entreated Zedekiah to put him to -death as a pernicious traitor, who weakened the hands of the patriot -soldiers. Jeremiah was not guilty of the lack of patriotism with which -they charged him. The day of independence had passed for ever, and -Babylon, not Egypt, was the appointed suzerain. The counselling of -submission--as many a victorious chieftain has been forced at last to -counsel it, from the days of Hannibal to those of Thiers--is often the -true and the only possible patriotism in doomed and decadent nations. -Zedekiah timidly abandoned the prophet to the rage of his enemies; but -being afraid to murder him openly as Urijah had been murdered, they -flung him into a well in the dungeon of Malchiah, the king's son. Into -the mire of this pit he sank up to the arms, and there they purposely -left him to starve and rot.[864] But if no Israelite pitied him, his -condition moved the compassion of Ebed-Melech, an Ethiopian, one of -the king's eunuch-chamberlains. He hurried to the king in a storm of -pity and indignation. He found him sitting, as a king should do, at -the post of danger in the gate of Benjamin; for Zedekiah was not a -physical, though he was a moral, coward. Ebed-Melech told the king -that Jeremiah was dying of starvation, and Zedekiah bade him take -three[865] men with him and rescue the dying man. The faithful -Ethiopian hurried to a cellar under the treasury, took with him some -old, worn fragments of robes, and, letting them down by cords, called -to Jeremiah to put them under his arm-pits. He did so, and they drew -him up into the light of day, though he still remained in prison. - -It seems to have been at this time that, in spite of his grim -vaticination of immediate retribution, Jeremiah showed his serene -confidence in the ultimate future by accepting the proposal of his -cousin Hanameel to buy some of the paternal fields at Anathoth, though -at that very moment they were in the hands of the Chaldaeans. Such an -act publicly performed must have caused some consolation to the -besieged, just as did the courage of the Roman senator who gave a good -price for the estate outside the walls of Rome on which Hannibal was -actually encamped. - -Then Zedekiah once more secretly sent for him, and implored him to tell -the unvarnished truth. "If I do," said the prophet, "will you not kill -me? and will you in any case hearken to me?" Zedekiah swore not to -betray him to his enemies; and Jeremiah told him that, even at that -eleventh hour, if he would go out and make submission to the -Babylonians, the city should not be burnt, and he should save the lives -of himself and of his family. Zedekiah believed him, but pleaded that -he was afraid of the mockery of the deserters to whom he might be -delivered. Jeremiah assured him that he should not be so delivered, and -that, if he refused to obey, nothing remained for the city, and for him -and his wives and children, but final ruin. The king was too weak to -follow what he must now have felt to be the last chance which God had -opened out for him. He could only "attain to half-believe." He entrusted -the result to chance, with miserable vacillation of purpose; and the -door of hope was closed upon him. His one desire was to conceal the -interview; and if it came to the ears of the princes--of whom he was -shamefully afraid--he begged Jeremiah to say that he had only entreated -the king not to send him back to die in Jonathan's prison. - -As he had suspected, it became known that Jeremiah had been summoned -to an interview with the king. They questioned the prophet in prison. -He told them the story which the king had suggested to him, and the -truth remained undiscovered. For this deflection from exact truth it -is tolerably certain that, in the state of men's consciences upon the -subject of veracity in those days, the prophet's moral sense did not -for a moment reproach him. He remained in his prison, guarded probably -by the faithful Ebed-Melech, until Jerusalem was taken. - -Let us pity the dreadful plight of Zedekiah, aggravated as it was by -his weak temperament. "He stands at the head of a people determined to -defend itself, but is himself without either hope or courage."[866] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[852] Homer, _Iliad_, i. 106-109. - -[853] But it must not be forgotten that Jer. xxxi. 1-34 is so hopeful -that it has been called "the Gospel before Christ." - -[854] Jer. vi. 14, viii. 11; Ezek. xiii. 10. - -[855] W. R. Smith, "Prophets" (_Enc. Brit._). - -[856] Jer. xxxvii, 11-15. - -[857] Jer xxxviii. 5. The Jewish aristocracy consisted, says Graetz, of -three classes: the _beni hammelech_, or "king's sons"--_i.e._, princes -of the blood-royal; the _roshi aboth_, "heads of the fathers," or -_zekenim_, "elders"; and the _abhodi hammelech_, "king's servants," or -"courtiers" (ii. 446). - -[858] Lam. v. 4. - -[859] Jer. xxxvii. 21, xxxviii. 9, lii. 6. - -[860] Lam. iv. 7, 8. - -[861] Lam. iv. 10, ii. 20; Ezek. v. 10; Baruch ii. 3. - -[862] Lam. iv. 5. See Stanley, _Lectures_, ii. 470. - -[863] Ezek. xi. 22. - -[864] This may possibly be alluded to in Psalm lxix. 2. - -[865] Jer. xxxviii. 10, A.V., "thirty." - -[866] Van Oort, iv. 52. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXVIII - - _THE FALL OF JERUSALEM_ - - B.C. 586 - - 2 KINGS xxv. 1-21 - - "In that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all - nations."--ZECH. xii. 3. - - "An end is come, the end is come; it awaketh against thee: behold - the end is come."--EZEK. vii. 6. - - "Behold yon sterile spot - Where now the wandering Arab's tent - Flaps in the desert blast; - There once old Salem's haughty fane - Reared high to heaven its thousand golden domes, - And in the blushing face of day - Exposed its shameful glory." - SHELLEY. - - -After the siege had lasted for a year and a half, all but one day, at -midnight the besiegers made a breach in the northern city wall.[867] -It was a day of terrible remembrance, and throughout the exile it was -observed as a solemn fast.[868] - -Nebuchadrezzar was no longer in person before the walls. He had other -war-like operations and other sieges on hand--the sieges of Tyre, -Asekah, and Lachish--as well as Jerusalem. He had therefore -established his headquarters at Lachish, and did not superintend the -final operations against the city.[869] But now that all had become -practically hopeless, and the capture of the rest of Jerusalem was -only a matter of a few days more, Zedekiah and his few best surviving -princes and soldiers fled by night through the opposite quarter of the -city. There was a little unwatched postern between two walls near the -king's garden, and through this he and his escort fled, hoping to -reach the Arabah, and make good his escape, perhaps to the -Wady-el-Arish, which he could reach in five hours, through the wilds -beyond the Jordan.[870] The heads of the king and his followers were -muffled, and they carried on their shoulders their choicest -possessions.[871] But he was betrayed by some of the mean -deserters,[872] and pursued by the Chaldaeans. His movements were -doubtless impeded by the presence of his harem and his children. His -little band of warriors could offer no resistance, and fled in all -directions. Zedekiah, his family, and attendants were taken prisoners, -and carried to Riblah to appear before the mighty conqueror.[873] -Nebuchadrezzar showed no pity towards one whom he had elevated to the -throne, and who had violated his most solemn assurances by intriguing -with his enemies. He brought him to trial, and doomed him to witness -with his own eyes the massacre of his two sons and of his attendants. -After he had endured this anguish, worse than death, his eyes were put -out, and, bound in double fetters,[874] he was sent to Babylon, where -he ended his miserable days. To blind a king deprived him of all hope -of recovering the throne, and was therefore in ancient days a common -punishment.[875] The LXX. adds that he was sent by the Babylonians to -grind a mill--[Greek: eis oikion mylonos]. This is probably a -reminiscence of the blinded Samson. But thus were fulfilled with -startling literalness two prophecies which might well have seemed to -be contradictory.[876] For Jeremiah had said (xxxiv. 3),-- - -"Thine eyes shall behold the eyes of the King of Babylon, and he shall -speak with thee mouth to mouth, and thou shalt go to Babylon." - -Whereas Ezekiel had said (xii. 13),-- - -"I will bring him to Babylon, the land of the Chaldaeans; yet shall he -not see it, though he shall die there." - -Henceforth Zedekiah was forgotten, and his place knew him no more. We -can only hope that in his blindness and solitude he was happier than -he had been on the throne of Judah, and that before death came to end -his miseries he found peace with God. - -The conqueror did not come to spoil the city. He left that task to three -great officers,--Nebuzaradan, the captain of the guard, or chief -executioner;[877] Nebushasban, the Rabsaris, or chief of the eunuchs; -and Nergalshareser, the Rabmag, or chief of the magicians. They took -their station by the Middle Gate, and first gave up the city to pillage -and massacre. No horror was spared.[878] The sepulchres were rifled for -treasure; the young Levites were slain in the house of their Sanctuary; -women were violated; maidens and hoary-headed men were slain. "Princes -were hanged up by the hand, and the faces of elders were dishonoured; -priest and prophet were slain in the Sanctuary of the Lord,"[879] till -the blood flowed like red wine from the winepress over the desecrated -floor.[880] The guilty city drank at the hand of God the dregs of the -cup of His fury.[881] It was the final vengeance. "The punishment of -thine iniquity is accomplished, O daughter of Zion. He will no more -carry thee away into captivity."[882] And, meanwhile, the little Bedouin -principalities were full of savage exultation at the fate of their -hereditary foe.[883] This was felt by the Jews as a culmination of their -misery, that they became a derision to their enemies. The callous -insults hurled at them by the neighbouring tribes in their hour of shame -awoke that implacable wrath against Gebal and Ammon and Amalek which -finds its echo in the Prophets and in the Psalms.[884] - -After this the devoted capital was given up to destruction. The Temple -was plundered. All that remained of its often-rifled splendours was -carried away, such as the ancient pillars Jachin and Boaz, the -masterpieces of Hiram's art, the caldron, the brazen sea, and all the -vessels of gold, of silver, and of brass. Then the walls of the city -were dismantled and broken down. The Temple, and the palace, and all the -houses of the princes were committed to the flames. As for the principal -remaining inhabitants, Seraiah the chief priest, perhaps the grandson of -Hilkiah and the grandfather of Ezra, Zephaniah the second priest, the -three Levitic doorkeepers, the secretary of war, five of the greatest -nobles who "saw the king's face,"[885] and sixty of the common people -who had been marked out for special punishment, were taken to Riblah, -and there massacred by order of Nebuchadrezzar.[886] With these -Nebuchadrezzar took away as his prisoners a multitude of the wealthier -inhabitants, leaving behind him but the humblest artisans. As the -craftsmen and smiths had been deported,[887] these poor people busied -themselves in agriculture, as vine-dressers and husbandmen. The existing -estates were divided among them; and being few in number, they found the -amplest sustenance in treasures of wheat and barley, and oil and honey, -and summer fruits, which they kept concealed for safety, as the -fellaheen of Palestine do to this day.[888] - -According to the historic chapters added to the prophecies of -Jeremiah, the whole number of captives carried away from Jerusalem by -Nebuchadrezzar in the seventh, the eighteenth, and the twenty-third -years of his reign were 4,600.[889] The completeness of the desolation -might well have caused the heart-rending outcry of Psalm lxxix.: "O -God, the heathen are come into Thine inheritance; Thy holy Temple have -they defiled; they have made Jerusalem a heap of stones. The dead -bodies of Thy servants have they given to be meat unto the fowls of -heaven, and the flesh of Thy saints unto the beasts of the land. Their -blood have they shed like water round about Jerusalem; and there was -no man to bury them." - -Among the remnant of the people was Jeremiah. Nebuzaradan had received -from his king the strictest injunctions to treat him honourably; for he -had heard from the deserters that he had always opposed the rebellion, -and had prophesied the issue of the siege. He was indeed sent in -manacles to Ramah;[890] but there Nebuchadrezzar gave him free choice to -do exactly as he liked--either to accompany him to Babylon, where he -should be well treated and cared for, or to return to Jerusalem, and -live where he liked. This was his desire. Nebuchadrezzar therefore -dismissed him with food and a present;[891] and he returned. The LXX. -and Vulgate represent him as sitting weeping over the ruins of -Jerusalem, and tradition says that he sought for his lamentations a cave -still existing near the Damascus Gate. Of this Scripture knows nothing. -But the melancholy prophet was only reserved for further tragedies. He -had lived one of the most afflicted of human lives. A man of tender -heart and shrinking disposition, he had been called to set his face like -a flint against kings, and nobles, and mobs. Worse than this, being -himself a prophet and priest, naturally led to sympathise with both, he -was the doomed antagonist of both--victim of "one of the strongest of -human passions, the hatred of priests against a priest who attacks his -own order, the hatred of prophets against a prophet who ventures to have -a voice and a will of his own." Even his own family had plotted against -his life at humble Anathoth;[892] and when he retreated to Jerusalem, he -found himself at the centre of the storm. Now perhaps he hoped for a -gleam of sunset peace. But his hopes were disappointed. He had to tread -the path of anguish and hatred to the bitter end, as he had trodden it -for nearly fifty years of the troubled life which had followed his call -in early boyhood. - -"But, in the case of Jerusalem," says Dean Stanley, "both its first -and second destruction have the peculiar interest of involving the -dissolution of a religious dispensation, combined with the agony of an -expiring nation, such as no other people has survived, and, by -surviving, carried on the living recollection, first of one, and then -of the other, for centuries after the first shock was over."[893] - -FOOTNOTES: - -[867] Jos., _Antt._, X. viii. 2; 2 Chron. xxxii. 5, xxxiii. 14. First -and last, the siege seems to have lasted one year, five months, and -twenty-seven days. - -[868] Zech. viii. 19. - -[869] The inscriptions of Nebuchadrezzar which have been as yet -deciphered speak of his sumptuous buildings and of his worship of the -gods rather than of his conquests. See _Records of the Past_, vii. -69-78. - -[870] Robinson, _Bibl. Res._, ii. 536. Some suppose that "the king's -garden" was near the mouth of the Tyropoeon Valley. - -[871] Ezek. xii. 12. Perhaps the gate alluded to is the fountain gate -of Neh. iii. 15. Ezekiel seems to speak of "digging through the wall." -Robinson says that a trace of the outermost wall still exists in the -rude pathway which crosses the mouth of the Tyropoeon on a mound hard -by the old mulberry tree which marks the traditional site of Isaiah's -martyrdom. - -[872] Jos., _Antt._, X. viii. 2. - -[873] Traces of his presence are found in inscriptions in the Wady of -the Dog near Beyrout, and in Wady Brissa. See Sayce, _Proceedings of -the Bibl. Arch. Soc._, November 1881. - -[874] 2 Kings xxv. 7. See Layard, _Nineveh_, ii. 376. - -[875] The blinding was sometimes done by passing a red-hot rod of -silver or brass over the open eyes; sometimes by plucking out the eyes -(Jer. lii. 11, Vulg. _oculos eruit_; 2 Kings xxv. 7, _effodit_). See a -hideous illustration of a yet more brutal process in Botta (_Monum. de -Nineve_, Pl. cxviii.), where Sargon with his own hand is thrusting a -lance into the eyes of a captive prince, whose head is kept steady by -a bridle fastened to a hook through his lips. See also Judg. xvi. 21; -Xen., _Anab._, i. 9, Sec. 13; Procopius, _Bel. Pers._, i. 1; Ammianus, -xxvii. 12; Rawlinson, _Ancient Monarchies_, i. 307. - -[876] Jos., _Antt._, X. viii. 2, 3. - -[877] Nebur-zir-iddina, "Nebo bestowed seed." Jer. xxxix. 9, 13, is in -some way corrupt. Ezekiel (ix. 2), however, and Josephus (_Antt._, X. -viii. 2) mention _six_ officers. Nebuzaradan was "chief of the -executioners" (Gen. xxxvii. 36; 1 Kings ii. 25, 35, 46). - -[878] Psalm lxxix. 2, 3. - -[879] 2 Chron. xxxvi. 17; Lam. ii. 21, v. 11, 12. - -[880] To the reminiscences of these scenes are partly due the Talmudic -legend about the blood of Zechariah, the son of Jehoiada, bubbling up -to demand vengeance. Nebudchadrezzar slew a holocaust of human victims -to appease the shade of the wrathful prophet, until the king himself -was terrified, and asked if he wished his whole people to be -slaughtered. Then the blood ceased to bubble. - -[881] See Rawlinson, _Kings of Israel and Judah_, p. 236. - -[882] Lam. iv. 22. - -[883] Psalm lxxix, 1. - -[884] Obad. 14-16; Psalm cxxxvii. 7; 1 Esdras iv. 45. - -[885] Comp. Esther i. 14. - -[886] On these personages see 1 Chron. vi. 13, 14; 2 Kings xxii. 4; -Ezra vii. 1; Jer. xxi. 1, xxxvii. 3, etc. - -[887] Nebuchadrezzar had no doubt needed them for his great buildings -at Babylon, and their deportation would render more difficult any -attempt to refortify Jerusalem. - -[888] Jer. xli. 8, xl. 12. - -[889] Jer. lii. 28-30. In his seventh year, 3,023; in his eighteenth, -832 in his thirty-third, 745 = 4,600. - -[890] Ramah was but five miles from Jerusalem, and at first Jeremiah -may not have been identified (Jer. xl. 1-6). - -[891] The present, if accepted, could only be regarded, under the -circumstances, as part of the necessity of life. It does not fall -under the head of the presents often offered to prophets (1 Sam. ix. -7; 2 Kings iv. 42; Mic. iii. 5, 11; Amos vii. 12). - -[892] Jer. xi. 19-21, xii. 6. - -[893] Stanley, _Lectures_, ii. 515. - - - - - CHAPTER XXXIX - - _GEDALIAH_ - - B.C. 586 - - 2 KINGS xxv. 22-30 - - "Vedi che son un che piango."--DANTE, _Inferno_. - - "No, rather steel thy melting heart - To act the martyr's sternest part, - To watch with firm, unshrinking eye - Thy darling visions as they die, - Till all bright hopes and hues of day - Have faded into twilight grey." - KEBLE. - - -In deciding that he would not accompany Nebuchadrezzar to Babylon, -Jeremiah made the choice of duty. In Chaldaea he would have lived at -ease, in plenty, in security, amid universal respect. He might have -helped his younger contemporary Ezekiel in his struggle to keep the -exiles in Babylon faithful to their duty and their God. He regarded the -exiles as representing all that was best and noblest in the nation; and -he would have been safe and honoured in the midst of them, under the -immediate protection of the great Babylonian king. On the other hand, to -return to Judaea was to return to a defenceless and a distracted people, -the mere dregs of the true nation, the mere phantom of what they once -had been. Surely his life had earned the blessing of repose? But no! The -hopes of the Chosen People, the seed of Abraham, God's servant, could -not be dissevered from the Holy Land. Rest was not for him on this side -of the grave. His only prayer must be, like that which Senancour had -inscribed over his grave, "Eternite, deviens mon asile!" The decision -cost him a terrible struggle; but duty called him, and he obeyed. It has -been supposed by some critics[894] that the wild cry of Jer. xv. 10-21 -expresses his anguish at the necessity of casting in his lot with the -remnant; the sense that they needed his protecting influence and -prophetic guidance; and the promise of God that his sacrifice should not -be ineffectual for good to the miserable fragment of his nation, even -though they should continue to struggle against him. - -So with breaking heart he saw Nebuzaradan at Ramah marshalling the -throng of captives for their long journey to the waters of Babylon. -Before them, and before the little band which returned with him to the -burnt Temple, the dismantled city, the desolate house, there lay an -unknown future; but in spite of the exiles' doom it looked brighter -for them than for him, as with tears and sobs they parted from each -other. Then it was that-- - -"A voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, and bitter weeping; Rachel -weeping for her children refuseth to be comforted, because they are -not. Thus saith the Lord, 'Refrain thy voice from weeping, and thine -eyes from tears: for thy work shall be rewarded,' saith the Lord; 'and -they shall come again from the land of the enemy. And there is hope -for thy time to come,' saith the Lord, 'that thy children shall come -again to their own border.'"[895] - -Disappointed in the fidelity of the royal house of Judah, -Nebuchadrezzar had not attempted to place another of them on the throne. -He appointed Gedaliah, the son of Ahikam, the son of Shaphan, his satrap -(_pakid_) over the poor remnant who were left in the land. In this -appointment we probably trace the influence of Jeremiah. There is no one -whom Nebuchadrezzar would have been so likely to consult. Gedaliah was -the son of the prophet's old protector,[896] and his grandfather Shaphan -had been a trusted minister of Josiah. He thoroughly justified the -confidence reposed in him, and under his wise and prosperous rule there -seemed to be every prospect that there would be at least some pale gleam -of returning prosperity. The Jews, who during the period of the siege -had fled into all the neighbouring countries, no sooner heard of his -viceroyalty than they came flocking back from Moab, and Ammon, and Edom. -They found themselves, perhaps for the first time in their lives, in -possession of large estates, from which the exiles of Babylon had been -dispossessed; and favoured by an abundant harvest, "they gathered wine -and summer fruits very much."[897] - -Jerusalem--dismantled, defenceless, burnt--was no longer habitable. It -was all but deserted, so that jackals and hyaenas prowled even over the -mountain of the Lord's House. All attempt to refortify it would have -been regarded as rebellion, and such a mere "lodge in a garden of -cucumbers" would have been useless to repress the marauding incursions -of the envious Moabites and Edomites, who had looked on with shouts at -the destruction of the city, and exulted when her carved work was -broken down with axes and hammers. Gedaliah therefore fixed his -headquarters at Mizpah, about six miles north of Jerusalem, of which -the lofty eminence could be easily secured.[898] It was the watchtower -from which Titus caught his first glimpses of the Holy City, as many a -traveller does to this day, and the point at which Richard I. averted -his eyes with tears, saying that he was unworthy to look upon the city -which he was unable to save. Here, then, Gedaliah lived, urging upon -his subjects the policy which his friend and adviser Jeremiah had -always supported, and promising them quietness and peace if they would -but accept the logic of circumstances--if they would bow to the -inevitable, and frankly acknowledge the suzerainty of Nebuchadrezzar. -It was perhaps as a pledge of more independence in better days to come -that Nebuzaradan had left Gedaliah in charge of the young daughters of -King Zedekiah, who had with them some of their eunuch-attendants. As -that unfortunate monarch was only thirty-two years old when he was -blinded and carried away, the princesses were probably young girls; -and it has been conjectured that it was part of the Chaldaean king's -plan for the future that in time Gedaliah should be permitted to marry -one of them, and re-establish at least a collateral branch of the old -royal house of David. - -How long this respite continued we do not know. The language of -Jeremiah xxxix 2, xli. 1, compared with 2 Kings xxv. 8, might seem to -imply that it only lasted two months. But since Jeremiah does not -mention the year in xli. 1, and as there seems to have been yet -another deportation of Jews by Nebuchadrezzar five years latter (Jer. -lii. 30), which may have been in revenge for the murder of his satrap, -some have supposed that Gedaliah's rule lasted four years. All is -uncertain, and the latter passage is of doubtful authenticity; but it -is at least possible that the vengeful atrocity committed by Ishmael -followed almost immediately after the Chaldaean forces were well out of -sight. Respecting these last days of Jewish independence, "History, -leaning semisomnous on her pyramid, muttereth something, but we know -not what it is." - -However this may be, there seem to have been guerilla bands wandering -through the country, partly to get what they could, and partly to -watch against Bedouin marauders. Johanan, the son of Kareah, who was -one of the chief captains among them,[899] came with others to -Gedaliah, and warned him that Baalis, King of Ammon, was intriguing -against him, and trying to induce a certain Ishmael, the son of -Nethaniah, the son of Elishama--who, in some way unknown to us, -represented, perhaps on the female side, the seed royal[900]--to come -and murder him. Gedaliah was of a fine, unsuspicious temperament, and -with rash generosity he refused to believe in the existence of a plot -so ruinous and so useless. Astonished at his noble incredulity, -Johanan then had a secret interview with him, and offered to murder -Ishmael so secretly that no one should know of it. "Why," he asked, -"should this man be suffered to ruin everything, and cause the final -scattering of even the struggling handful of colonists at Mizpah and -in Judah?" Gedaliah forbad his intervention. "Thou shalt not do this," -he said: "thou speakest falsely of Ishmael." - -But Johanan's story was only too true. Shortly afterwards, Ishmael, -with ten confederates,[901] came to visit Gedaliah at Mizpah, perhaps -on the pretext of seeing his kinswomen, the daughters of Zedekiah. -Gedaliah welcomed this ambitious villain and his murderous accomplices -with open-handed hospitality. He invited them all to a banquet in the -fort of Mizpah; and after eating salt with him, Ishmael and his -bravoes first murdered him, and then put promiscuously to the sword -his soldiers, and the Chaldaeans who had been left to look after -him.[902] The gates of the fort were closed, and the bodies were flung -into a deep well or tank,[903] which had been constructed by Asa in -the middle of the courtyard, when he was fortifying Mizpah against the -attacks of Baasha, King of Israel. - -For two days there was an unbroken silence, and the peasants at Mizpah -remained unaware of the dreadful tragedy. On the third day a sad -procession was seen wending its way up the heights. There were scattered -Jews in Shiloh and Samaria who still remembered Zion; and eighty -pilgrims, weeping as they went, came with shaven beards and rent -garments to bring a _minchah_ and incense to the ruined shrine at -Jerusalem. In the depth of their woe they had even violated a law (Lev. -xix. 28, xxi. 5), of which they were perhaps unaware, by cutting -themselves in sign of their misery. Mizpah would be their last -halting-place on the way to Jerusalem; and the hypocrite Ishmael came -out to them with an invitation to share the hospitality of the murdered -satrap. No sooner had the gate of the charnel-house closed upon -them,[904] than Ishmael and his ten ruffians began to murder this -unoffending company. Crimes more aimless and more brutal than those -committed by this infinitely degenerate scion of the royal house it is -impossible to conceive. The place swam with blood. The story "reads -almost like a page from the annals of the Indian Mutiny." Seventy of the -wretched pilgrims had been butchered and flung into the tank, which must -have been choked with corpses, like the fatal well at Cawnpore,[905] -when the ten survivors pleaded for their lives by telling Ishmael that -they had large treasures of country produce stored in hidden places, -which should be at his disposal if he would spare them.[906] - -As it was useless to make any further attempt to conceal his -atrocities, Ishmael now took the young princesses and the inhabitants -of Mizpah with him, and tried to make good his escape to his patron -the King of Ammon. But the watchful eye of Johanan, the son of Kareah, -had been upon him, and assembling his band he went in swift pursuit. -Ishmael had got no farther than the Pool of Gibeon, when Johanan -overtook him, to the intense joy of the prisoners. A scuffle ensued; -but Ishmael and eight of his blood-stained desperadoes unhappily -managed to make good their escape to the Ammonites. The wretch -vanishes into the darkness, and we hear of him no more. - -Even now the circumstances were desperate. Nebuchadrezzar could not in -honour overlook the frustration of all his plans, and the murder, not -only of his viceroy, but even of his Chaldaean commissioners. He would -not be likely to accept any excuses. No course seemed open but that of -flight. There was no temptation to return to Mizpah with its frightful -memories and its corpse-choked tank. From Gibeon the survivors made -their way to Bethlehem, which lay on the road to Egypt, and where they -could be sheltered in the caravanserai of Chimham. Many Jews had -already taken refuge in Egypt. Colonies of them were living in -Pathros, and at Migdol and Noph, under the kindly protection of -Pharaoh Hophrah. Would it not be well to join them? - -In utter perplexity Johanan and the other captains and all the people -came to Jeremiah. How he had escaped the massacre at Mizpah we do not -know; but now he seemed to be the only man left in whose prophetic -guidance they could confide. They entreated him with pathetic -earnestness to show them the will of Jehovah; and he promised to pray -for insight, while they pledged themselves to obey implicitly his -directions. - -The anguish and vacillation of the prophet's mind is shown by the fact -that for ten whole days no light came to him. It seemed as if Judah -was under an irrevocable curse. Whither could they return? What -temptation was there to return? Did not return mean fresh intolerable -miseries? Would they not be torn to pieces by the robber bands from -across the Jordan? And what could be the end of it but another -deportation to Babylon, with perhaps further massacre and starvation? - -All the arguments seemed against this course; and he could see very -clearly that it would be against all the wishes of the down-trodden -fugitives who longed for Egypt, "where we shall see no war, nor hear -the sound of the trumpet, nor have hunger of bread." - -Yet Jeremiah could only give them the message which he believed to -represent the will of God. He bade them return. He assured them that -they need have no fear of the King of Babylon, and that God would -bless them; whereas if they went to Egypt, they would die by the -sword, the famine, and the pestilence. At the same time--doomed always -to thwart the hopes of the multitude--he reproved the hypocrisy which -had sent them to ask God's will when they never intended to do -anything but follow their own. - -Then their anger broke out against him. He was, as always, the prophet -of evil, and they held him more than half responsible for being the -_cause_ of the ruin which he invariably predicted. Johanan and "all -the proud men" (_zedim_) gave him the lie. They told him that the -source of his prophesy was not Jehovah, but the meddling and -pernicious Baruch. Perhaps some of them may have remembered the words -of Isaiah, that a day should come when five cities, of which one -should be called Kir-Cheres ("the City of Destruction")--a play on the -name Kir-Heres, "the City of the Sun," On or Heliopolis should--speak -the language of Canaan and swear by the Lord of hosts, and there -should be an altar in the land of Egypt and a _matstsebah_ at its -border in witness to Jehovah, and that though Egypt should be smitten -she should also be healed.[907] - -So they settled to go to Egypt; and taking with them Jeremiah, and -Baruch, and the king's daughters, and all the remnant, they made their -way to Tahpanhes or Daphne,[908] an advanced post to guard the road to -Syria. Mr. Flinders Petrie in 1886 discovered the site of the city at -Tel Defenneh, and the ruins of the very palace which Pharaoh Hophrah -placed at the disposal of the daughters of his ally Zedekiah. It is -still known by the name of "The Castle of the Jew's Daughters"--_El -Kasr el Bint el Jehudi_.[909] - -In front of this palace was an elevated platform (_mastaba_) of brick, -which still remains. In this brickwork Jeremiah was bidden by the word -of Jehovah to place great stones, and to declare that on that very -platform, over those very stones, Nebuchadrezzar should pitch his -royal tent, when he came to wrap himself in the land of Egypt, as a -shepherd wraps himself in his garment, and to burn the pillars of -Heliopolis with fire.[910] - -Jeremiah still had to face stormy times. At some great festival -assembly at Tahpanhes he bitterly reproached the exiled Jews for their -idolatries. He was extremely indignant with the women who burned -incense to the Queen of Heaven. The multitude, and especially the -women, openly defied him. "We will not hearken to thee," they said. -"We will continue to burn incense, and offer offerings to the Queen of -Heaven, _as we have done, we, and our fathers, our kings, and our -princes, in the cities of Judah, and in the streets of Jerusalem_; for -then had we plenty of victuals, and were well, and saw no evil. It is -only since we have left off making cakes for her and honouring her -that we have suffered hunger and desolation; and our husbands were -always well aware of our proceedings." - -Never was there a more defiantly ostentatious revolt against God and -against His prophet! Remonstrance seemed hopeless. What could Jeremiah -do but menace them with the wrath of Heaven, and tell them that in -sign of the truth of his words the fate of Pharaoh Hophrah should be -the same as the fate of Zedekiah, King of Judah, and should be -inflicted by the hand of Nebuchadrezzar.[911] - -So on the colony of fugitives the curtain of revelation rushes down in -storm. The prophet went on the troubled path which, if tradition be -true, led him at last to martyrdom. He is said to have been stoned by -his infuriated fellow-exiles. But his name lived in the memory of his -people. It was he (they believed) who had hidden from the Chaldaeans -the Ark and the sacred fire, and some day he should return to reveal -the place of their concealment.[912] When Christ asked His disciples -six hundred years later, "Whom say the people that I am?" one of the -answers was, "Some say Jeremiah or one of the prophets." He became, -so to speak, the guardian saint of the land in which he had suffered -such cruel persecutions. - -But the historian of the Kings does not like to leave the close of his -story in unbroken gloom. He wrote during the Exile. He has narrated -with tears the sad fate of Jehoiachin; and though he does not care to -dwell on the Exile itself, he is glad to narrate one touch of kindness -on the part of the King of Babylon, which he doubtless regarded as a -pledge of mercies yet to come. Twenty-six years had elapsed since the -capture of Jerusalem, and thirty-seven since the captivity of the -exiled king, when Evil-Merodach, the son and successor of -Nebuchadrezzar, took pity on the imprisoned heir of the House of -David.[913] He took Jehoiachin from his dungeon, changed his garments, -spoke words of encouragement to him, gave him a place at his own -table,[914] assigned to him a regular allowance from his own -banquet,[915] and set his throne above the throne of all the other -captive kings who were with him in Babylon. It might seem a trivial -act of mercy, yet the Jews remembered in their records the very day of -the month on which it had taken place, because they regarded it as a -break in the clouds which overshadowed them--as "the first gleam of -heaven's amber in the Eastern grey." - -FOOTNOTES: - -[894] So Graetz and Cheyne. - -[895] Jer. xxxi. 15-17. - -[896] Jer. xxvi. 24. - -[897] Jer. xl. 12. - -[898] Some identify it with _Shaphat_, a mile from Jerusalem. - -[899] They are called _sari_ ("princes"). - -[900] There is no Elishama in the royal genealogy, except a son of -David. Ishmael may have been the son or grandson of some Ammonite -princess. An Elishama was scribe of Jehoiakim (Jer. xxxvi. 12). - -[901] The Hebrew text calls these ten ruffians _rabbi hammelech_, -"chief officers of the king" of Ammon. - -[902] Josephus records or conjectures that the governor was -overpowered by wine, and had sunk into slumber (_Antt._, X. ix. 2). - -[903] In Jer. xli. 9, for "because of Gedaliah," the better reading is -"was a great pit" (LXX., [Greek: phrear mega]). - -[904] Ishmael--a marvel of craft and villainy--put into practice the -same stratagem which on a larger scale was employed by Mohammed Ali in -his massacre of the Mamelukes at Cairo in 1806 (Grove, _s.v._ _Bibl. -Dict._). For "the midst of the city" (Jer. xli. 7), we ought to read -"courtyard," as in Josephus. - -[905] Comp. Jehu's treatment of the family of Ahaziah (2 Kings x. 14). - -[906] The dark deed is still commemorated by a Jewish fast, as in the -days of Zechariah (Zech. vii. 3-5, viii. 19). - -[907] Isa. xix. 18-22. - -[908] Jer. ii. 16, xliv. 1; Ezek. xxx. 18; Jer. xliii. 7, xlvi. 14; -Herod., ii. 30. - -[909] Fl. Petrie, _Memoir on Tanis_ (Egypt. Explor. Fund, 4th memoir), -1888. - -[910] Jer. xliii. 13, Beth-shemesh. Only one pillar of the Temple of -the Sun is now standing. It is said to be four thousand years old. It -is certain that Nebuchadrezzar invaded Egypt and defeated Amasis, the -son of Hophrah, B.C. 565, reducing Egypt to "the basest of kingdoms" -(Ezek. xxix. 14, 15). Three of Nebuchadrezzar's terra-cotta cylinders -have been found at Tahpanhes. - -[911] How far the prophecy was fulfilled we do not know. Assyrian and -Egyptian fragments of record show that in the thirty-seventh year of -his reign Nebuchadrezzar invaded Egypt and advanced to Syene (Ezek. -xxix. 10). - -[912] 2 Macc. ii. 1-8; comp. xv. 13-16. The tradition is singular when -we recall the small store which Jeremiah set by the Ark (Jer. iii. 16). - -[913] Evil-Merodach (Avil-Marduk, "Man of Merodach") only reigned two -years, and was then murdered by his brother-in-law Neriglissar -(Berosus _ap._ Jos.: comp. _Ap._, i. 20). The Rabbis have a -story--perhaps founded on that of Gaius and Agrippa I.--that -Evil-Merodach had been imprisoned by his father for wishing his death, -and in prison formed a friendship for Jehoiachin. - -[914] "Lifted up his head." Comp. Gen. xl. 13, 20. - -[915] To be thus [Greek: homotrapezos], or [Greek: syssitos], of the -king was a high honour (Herod., iii. 13, v. 24. Comp. Judg. i. 7; 2 -Sam. ix. 13, etc.). - - - - - EPILOGUE - - "On Jordan's banks the Arab's camels stray, - On Zion's hills the False One's votaries pray, - The Baal-adorer bows on Sinai's steep; - Yet there--e'en there--O God, Thy thunders sleep." - BYRON. - - "God, Thou art Love: I build my faith on that." - BROWNING. - - -Before concluding I should like to add a few words (1) on what some may -regard as the too favourable attitude towards what is called the "Higher -Criticism" adopted in this book; and (2) on the deep, essential, eternal -lessons which we have found in chapter after chapter of it. - -1. As regards the first, I need only say that the one thing I seek, -the sole thing I care for, is Truth,--truth, not tradition. Even St. -Cyprian, devoted as he was to custom and tradition, warns us that -"Custom without Truth is only antiquated error," and that what we -believe must be established by reason, not prescribed by tradition. - -And it cannot be laid down too clearly that the old view of -Inspiration--which defined it as consisting in verbal dictation, which -made the sacred writers "not only the penmen but the pens of the Holy -Spirit," and which spoke of every sentence, word, syllable, and every -letter of Scripture as Divine and infallible--was a dangerous and -absolute falsity, and that any attempt in these days to enforce it as -binding on the intellect and conscience of mankind could only lead to -the utter shipwreck of all sincere and reasonable religion. "Not -needlessly," says the learned author of _Italy and her -Invaders_--himself an able opponent of many modern conclusions on the -subject--"should I wish to shake even that faith which practically -believes that the whole Bible, exactly in its present shape, yes, almost -the English Bible just as we have it, came straight down from heaven. -But we do want to get away from all mere theories as to the way in which -God _might_ have revealed Himself, and to learn as much as we can of the -way in which He _has_ revealed Himself in actual fact, and in real human -lives."[916] - -To do this has been one of my objects in this volume, and in the -preceding volume on the First Book of Kings. - -2. We have now only to cast one last glance on this book, and on the -lessons which it is meant to teach. - -Consider, first, its deep and varied interest. It has the combined -value of History and of Biography; and, in dealing with both, its aim -is to pass over all minor and earthly details, and to show the method -of God's dealings both with nations and with the individual soul. - -If we look at the book only as a History, it shows us in the briefest -possible compass a series of national events of the greatest -importance in the annals of mankind. We become witnesses of the fierce -occasional struggles between Israel and Judah, and of the constant -warfare of both with those wild surrounding nations--the people of -Moab, and of Edom, Gebal, and Ammon, and Amalek, the Philistines also, -and them that dwell at Tyre. We watch the indomitable resistance of -Tyre to Assyria and Babylon. We see the Northern Kingdom of Israel -rise into wealth, power, and luxury, only to sink into deep moral -corruption, until, at last, the patience of God is exhausted, and He -obliterates its very existence in an apparently final and irremediable -overthrow. We witness the rise, culmination, and fall of Syria; the -culmination and the crashing overthrow of Nineveh; the rise and the -splendour of Babylon. We see the surging tide of the nomad Scythians -and Cimmerians rise into flood and ebb away with spent and shallow -waves. We see the petty fortress of Zion triumph in its defiance of -the mighty hosts of Sennacherib because it is strong in reliance upon -God, and we see it grow faithless to God until it succumbs to the -captains of Nebuchadrezzar. Again and again we observe that the -Almighty stills the raging of the sea, the noise of his waves, and the -madness of the people. - -The conviction is borne upon our soul with overwhelming power, as we -read the pages of Amos, of Isaiah, and of Jeremiah, that, in spite of -all their rage and tumult, and apparently irresistible dominance, God -still sitteth above the water-floods, and God remaineth a King for ever. - -Side by side with this spectacle of the dealing of God with nations, in -which we see written in large letters, in characters of blood and of -fire, His dealing with guilty nations, we have abundantly in these -chapters the narrower yet more intense interest which arises from the -contemplation of human nature--one and the same in its general elements, -but infinitely varied in its conditions--in the lives of individual men. -It is revealed to us as in a picture--it is brought home to us, not by -didactic inferences, but with the silent conviction which springs from -the evidence of facts--that wealth is nothing, and rank nothing, and -power nothing, but that the only thing of essential importance in human -lives is whether a man does that which is good or that which is evil in -the sight of the Lord. Good and bad kings pass before us; and though the -best kings, like Hezekiah and Josiah, were no more free from earthly -misfortune than are any of the saints of God--though Hezekiah had to -suffer anguish and humiliation, and Josiah died in defeat on the -battle-field,--yet we are irresistibly led to the belief: "Say ye of the -righteous that it shall be well with him; for they shall eat the fruit -of their doings. Woe unto the wicked! It shall be ill with him; for the -work of his hands shall be done to him." - -We all have a guide in life. "We are not left to steer our course even -by the stars, which the clouds of earth may dim. The ship has something -on board which points towards the spiritual pole of the universe. I will -not venture to call it an _infallible_ guide. It wavers with tremulous -sensitiveness; it may be deflected by disturbing influences; but still -in the main it points with mysterious fidelity towards the pole of our -spirits, even God. And what is this compass which we have for our -guidance? Some would call it Conscience; but we call it by a holier -name, and say that even as the needle is acted on by the magnetic -current, so our spiritual compass is the spirit of man acted on by the -Spirit of the living and infinite God." The lesson of this book--of -every book of biography or of history--is that men are noble and useful -in proportion as they are true to that law of an enlightened conscience -which represents to them the will and the voice of God. - -Ahaziah and Jehoram of Judah, tainted with the blood of Jezebel, and -perverted by the example of Ahab, live wretchedly, reign contemptibly, -and perish miserably; while good Jehoshaphat and pious Josiah are -richly blessed. In the vaunting elation of Amaziah, in the -blood-stained ferocity of Jehu, in the ruthless examples of usurpation -and murder set by king after king in Israel, and in the consequences -which befell them, we see that "fruit is seed." Shallum, Menahem, -Pekah, Athaliah, have to pay a terrible price for brief spells of -troubled royalty; and the slow corruption and disintegration of the -people reflects the vile example of their rulers. Like king, like -people; like people, like priest. We look on at a succession of -thrilling scenes--the horrors of beleaguered cities, the raptures of -unexpected deliverance, the insulting vanities of triumph; we hear the -wail that rises from long lines of fettered captives as they turn -their backs weeping upon their native land. And we are told "strange -stories of the deaths of kings." We see the King of Moab sacrificing -his eldest son to Chemosh upon the wall of Kir-Haraseth in the sight -of three invading hosts. We shudder to think of Ahaz and Manasseh -passing their children through the fire before the grim bull-headed -monster in the valley of the children of Hinnom. We see the two -ghastly piles of the heads of young princes on either side the gates -of Jezreel. We see Jehu driving his fierce chariot over the body of -the painted Tyrian Queen. We catch a glimpse of the sackcloth under -the purple of the King of Israel as he rends his clothes at the -horrible cry of mothers who have devoured their babes. We see the -child Joash standing with the high priest in the Temple amid the blast -of trumpets, while the alien murderess is pushed out and hewn to the -ground. We see Manasseh dragged with hooks to Babylon. We watch the -haggard face of the miserable Zedekiah as his sons are slaughtered -before the eyes which thenceforth are blinded for evermore. We burn -with indignation to see the villain Ishmael close with corpses the -well of Mizpah. But even when the phantasmagoria seems most appalling -and most bloody, we watch the Day-star from on high begin to shed its -glory over the grey east. In due time that Day-star was to rise in -men's hearts and on the world, with healing in His wings; and we feel -that somehow, beyond the smoke and stir of earth's anguish, - - "God's in His heaven, - All's right with the world." - -And like a Greek chorus amid the agonies of destiny stand the -prophets, those clearest and greatest of moral teachers. They, in -spite of their holiness and faithfulness, are not exempt from the -calamities of life. Amos was insulted and expelled by the high priest -of Bethel; Urijah was martyred; Hosea's prophecy is one long and -almost unbroken wail; Isaiah was mocked and slandered by the priests -of Jerusalem, and, if the tradition be true, sawn asunder; Micah, -though spared, prophesied under imminent peril; Jeremiah, saddest of -mankind, type of the suffering servant of Jehovah, was smitten in the -face by the priest Pashur, thrust into the stocks for the general -derision, flung into a deathful prison, let down into a miry well, -hurried into exile, defied, denounced, insulted, at last in all -probability martyred. Prophets in general were hated and disbelieved. -They were the eternal antagonists of priests and mobs. With priests -they had so little affinity, that when a prophet was born a priest, -like Jeremiah and Ezekiel, he might count on the undying hatred and -antagonism of his order. Priests, with scarcely an exception, under -every erring or apostatising king, from Rehoboam to Ahaz, from Ahaz to -Zedekiah, with a monotony of meanness, did nothing but acquiesce, -careful mainly for their own rights and revenues; prophets did little -but raise, against them and their party, an unavailing protest. When, -in the days of the priest-regent Jehoiada, the priests had power, he -had made a special ordinance that there should be overseers in the -Temple whose function it should be to put in the stocks and the collar -"every man that is mad, and that maketh himself a prophet";[917] and -Shemaiah was quite indignant that there should be any delay in putting -this convenient ordinance into force. Priests were chiefly absorbed in -functions and futilities in the exact spirit of their guilty -successors in the days of Christ. There could be little sympathy -between them and the inspired messengers who spoke of such reliance on -observances with almost passionate scorn, and to whom religion meant -righteousness towards men and faith in the Living God. - -This high lesson of Prophecy came into greater prominence with each -succeeding generation. It had been taught by Amos, the first of the -literary prophets, with emphatic distinctness. It was summarised by -Hosea in words which our Saviour loved to quote: "Go ye and learn what -that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice." It had been -uttered by Micah in an outburst of splendid poetry which summed up all -that God requires. It was reiterated in many forms by Isaiah and by -Jeremiah in words of richer moral value than all that came from the -teaching of the priestly functionaries from the days when Aaron -seduced Israel with his golden calf till the days when Caiaphas and -Annas goaded the multitude to prefer Barabbas to Jesus, and to shout -of their Messiah, "Let Him be crucified." - -It was the richest fruit which sprang from the long Divine discipline of -the nation,--the knowledge that outward things are of no avail to save -any man; that God requires righteousness, that God looketh at the heart. - -And the prophets themselves had to learn by the irony of events that -no suppression of local sanctuaries under Hezekiah, no multiplication -of ceremonies and acceptance of Deuteronomic Codes under Josiah, were -deep enough to change men's hearts. Isaiah, like Amos, dwells with -anger on the reliance upon vain ritual, which is so cheap a substitute -for genuine holiness; and Jeremiah, despairing utterly of that -reformation under Josiah of which he had once felt hopeful, had to -denounce the new reliance on the Temple and its sacrifices. He -ultimately felt no confidence in anything except in a new covenant in -which God Himself would write His law upon men's hearts, and all -should know Him from the least even to the greatest. - -But the History of Prophecy also in this epoch is marked by events of -world-wide importance. In the days of Isaiah we see the change of -Israel from a nation into a church of the faithful, for which alone he -has any permanent hope. In him, too, we hear the first distinct -utterances of the final form in which should be fulfilled the -Messianic hope. Under Jeremiah there was still further advance. He -points, as Joel does, to the epoch of the gift of the Holy Spirit, and -shows that God does not only deal with men as nations, or as churches, -or even as families, but as beings with individual souls. - -This and much besides we have seen in the foregoing pages, in which we -have endeavoured to point the lessons of the Books of Kings. The one -main lesson which the narrative is meant to teach is absolute faith -and trust in God, as an anchor which holds amid the wildest storms of -ruin, and of apparently final failure. Not until we have realised that -truth can we hear the words of God, or see the vision of the Almighty. -When we have learnt it, we shall not fear, though the hills be moved -and carried into the midst of the sea. It is the lesson which gets -behind the meaning of failure, and raises us to a height from which we -can look down on prosperity as a thing which--except in fatally -delusive semblance--cannot exist apart from righteousness and faith. -This is the lesson of life, the lesson of lessons. If it does not -solve all problems on their intellectual side, it scatters all -perplexities in the spiritual sphere. It shows us that duty is the -reward of duty, and that there can be no happiness save for those who -have learnt that duty and blessedness are one. And thus even by this -book of annals--annals of wild deeds and troubled times--we may be -taught the truths which find their perfect illustration and proof in -the life and teaching of the Son of God. When those truths are our -real possession, the work of life is done. Then - - "Vigour may fail the towering fantasy, - But yet the Will rolls onward, like a wheel - In even motion by the love impelled - That moves the sun in heaven and all the stars." - -FOOTNOTES: - -[916] T. Hodgkin, _Friends' Quarterly_, September 1893, p. 401. - -[917] Jer. xxix. 25-27. - - - - - APPENDIX I - - _THE KINGS OF ASSYRIA, AND SOME OF THEIR - INSCRIPTIONS._ - - -Dates from the _Eponym Canon_ and the Assyrian Monuments; Schrader, -_Cuneiform Inscriptions, and the Old Testament_, E. Tr., 1888, pp. -167-187. - - B.C. - - 860.--Shalmaneser II. - - 854.--Battle of Karkar. War with _Ahab_ and _Benhadad_. - - 842.--War with Hazael. Tribute of _Jehu_. - - 825.--Samsi-Ramman.[918] - - 812.--Ramman-Nirari. - - 783.--Shalmaneser III. - - 773.--Assur-dan III. - - 763.--June 15th. Eclipse of the sun. - - 755.--Assur-Nirari. - - 745.--Tiglath-Pileser II. - - 742.--Azariah (Uzziah) heads a league of nineteen Hamathite - districts against Assyria (?). - - 740.--Death of Uzziah (?). - - 738.--Tribute of Menahem, Rezin, and Hiram. - - 734.--Expedition to Palestine against Pekah. Tribute of Ahaz. - - 732.--Capture of Damascus. Death of Rezin. First actual - collision between Israel and Assyria. - - 728.--Hoshea refuses tribute. - - 727.--Shalmaneser IV. - - 724.--Siege of Samaria begun. - - 722.--Sargon. Fall of Samaria. - - 721.--Defeat of Merodach-Baladan. - - 720.--Battle of Raphia. Defeat of Sabaco, King of Egypt. - - 715.--Subjugated people deported to Samaria. Accession of - Hezekiah. - - 711.--Capture of Ashdod. - - 707.--Building of great palace of Dur-Sarrukin. - - 709.--Sargon expels Merodach-Baladan, and becomes King of - Babylon. - - 705.--Assassination (?) of Sargon. - - 705.--Sennacherib. - - 704.--Embassy of Merodach-Baladan to Hezekiah. - - 703.--Belibus made King of Babylon. - - 702.--Construction of the Bellino Cylinder. - - 721.--Siege of Ekron. Defeat of Egypt at Altaqu. Siege of - Jerusalem. Campaign against Hezekiah and Tirhakah - disastrously concluded at Pelusium and Jerusalem. - - 681.--Murder of Sennacherib. - - 681.--Esar-haddon. - - 676.--Manasseh pays tribute. - - 668.--Assur-bani-pal (Sardanapalus). - - 608.--Death of Josiah in the battle of Megiddo against Pharaoh - Necho. - -The dates and names of Assyrian kings as given in _Records of the -Past_ (ii. 207, 208) do not exactly accord with these in all cases. - - B.C. - - Tiglath-Pileser II. 950 - Assur-dan II. 930 - Rimmon-Nirari II. 911 - Tiglath-Uras II. 889 - Assur-natzu-pal 883 - Shalmaneser II. 858 - Assur-dain-pal (a rebel) 825 - Samsi-Rimmon II. 823 - Rimmon-Nirari III. 810 - Shalmaneser III. 781 - Assur-dan III. 771 - Assur-Nirari 753 - Tiglath-Pileser III. (Pul) 745 - Shalmaneser IV. (an usurper) 727 - Sargon (Jareb?) (usurper) 722 - Sennacherib 705 - Esar-haddon I. 681 - Assur-bani-pal 668 - * * * * * * - Destruction of Nineveh under Esar-haddon - II., or Sarakos 606 - - - INSCRIPTION OF SHALMANESER II. ON THE BLACK OBELISK - IN THE BRITISH MUSEUM[919] - -It begins with an invocation to the gods Rimmon, Adar, Merodach, -Nergal, Beltis, Istar, and proceeds:-- - -"I am Shalmaneser, the strong king, king of all the four Zones of the -Sun, the marcher over the whole world, ... who has laid his yoke upon -all lands hostile to him, and has swept them like a whirlwind." - -It tells of his campaigns against the Hittites etc., etc. - -The allusion to Jehu runs as follows:-- - -"The tribute of Yahua, son of Khumri, silver, gold, bowls of gold, -vessels of gold, goblets of gold, pitchers of gold, lead, sceptres for -the king's hand, staves, I received." - -This inscription is supplemented by another on a monolith found at -Karkh, twenty miles from Diarbekr (_Records_, iii 81-100), which -mentions the battle of Karkar, with its slaughter of fourteen thousand -of the enemy, among whom was Sirlai--_i.e._, Ahab of Israel. - - - II - - TIGLATH-PILESER II. (CIRC. B.C. 739) - -In his Records he mentions no less than five Hebrew kings--Azariah, -Jehoahaz (Ahaz), Menahem, Pekah, Hoshea--as well as Rezin of Damascus, -Hiram of Tyre, etc. His name perhaps means "He who puts his trust in -Adar." See _Records of the_ _Past_, v. 45-52; Schrader, _Keilinschr._, -pp. 149-151; G. Smith, _Assyrian Discoveries_, pp. 254-287. - -Unfortunately the inscriptions are very mutilated and fragmentary. - - - III - -Our chief knowledge of SARGON is from the great inscription in the -Palace of Khorsabad. It is translated by Prof. Dr. Jules Oppert, -_Records of the Past_, ix. 1-21. The king's inscription at Bavian, -north-east of Mosul, is in the same volume, pp. 21-28, translated by -Dr. T. G. Pinches. See, too, _id._, vii. 21-56, xi. 15-40. - -The Khorsabad inscription has these passages:-- - -"The great gods have made me happy by the constancy of their affection; -they have granted me the exercise of my sovereignty over all kings." - -He says:-- - -"I besieged and occupied the town of Samaria; I took twenty-seven -thousand two hundred and eighty of its inhabitants captive. I took -from them fifty chariots, but left them the rest of their belongings. -I placed my lieutenants over them; I renewed the obligations imposed -upon them _by one of the kings who preceded me_." [Tiglath-Pileser, -whom Sargon does not choose to name.] - -"Hanun, King of Gaza, and Sabaco, Sultan of Egypt, allied themselves -at _Raphia_ to oppose me. I put them to flight. Sabaco fled, and no -one has seen any trace of him since. I imposed a tribute on Pharaoh, -King of Egypt." - -He tells us that he defeated the usurper Ilubid of Hamath, who had -been a smith; burnt Karkar; and flayed Ilubid alive. - -He defeated Azuri and Jaman of Ashdod, and his most persistent enemy, -Merodach-Baladan, son of Jakin, King of Chaldaea. - -He ends with a prayer that Assur may bless him. - - - IV - -Bellino's Cylinder comprises the first two years of SENNACHERIB. It is -translated by Mr. H. F. Talbot, _Records of the Past_, i. 22-32. It -was published by Layard in the first volume of _British Museum -Inscriptions_, pl. 63. The facsimile of it was made by Bellino. - -It begins:-- - -"SENNACHERIB, the great king, the powerful king, the king of Assyria, -the king unrivalled, the pious monarch, the worshipper of the great -gods, ... the noble warrior, the valiant hero, the first of all kings, -the great punisher of unbelievers who are breakers of the holy -festivals. - -"Assur, my lord, has given me an unrivalled monarchy. Over all princes -he has raised triumphantly my arms. - -"In the beginning of my reign I defeated Marduk-Baladan, King of -Babylon, and his allies the Elamites, in the plains near the city of -Kish. He fled alone; he got into the marshes full of reeds and rushes, -and so saved his life." - -(He proceeds to narrate the spoiling of Marduk's camp, and his palace -in Babylon, and how he carried off his wife, his harem, his nobles.) - -We see here an illustration of the vaunting tones of this king which -are so faithfully reproduced in 2 Kings xviii. - -His Bull Inscription, chiefly relating to his defeats of -Merodach-Baladan, is translated by Rev. J. M. Rodwell (_Records of the -Past_, vii. 57-64). - - - V - -The Taylor Cylinder, so called from its former possessor, is a hexagonal -clay prism found at Nineveh in 1830, and now in the British Museum -(translated by Mr. H. F. Talbot, _Records of the Past_, i. 33-53). - -The first two campaigns of Sennacherib are related as on the Bellino -Cylinder. The Taylor Cylinder narrates campaigns of his first eight -years. - -The story of the third campaign narrates the defeat of Elulaeus, King -of Sidon; the tribute of Menahem, King of Samaria; the defeat of -Zidka, King of Askelon; the revolt of Ekron, which deposed the -Assyrian vassal Padi, and sent him in iron chains to Hezekiah; the -battle of Egypt and Ethiopia at Altaqu (Eltekon, Josh. xv. 59), and -the capture of Timnath. Of Hezekiah the king says:-- - -"And Hezekiah, King of Judah, who had not bowed down at my feet, -forty-six of his strong cities, castles, and smaller towns, with -warlike engines, I captured; 200,500 people, small and great, male and -female, horses, sheep, etc., without number, I carried off. Himself I -shut up like a bird in a cage inside Jerusalem. Siege-towers against -him I constructed. I gave his plundered cities to the kings of Ashdod, -Ekron, and Gaza. I diminished his kingdom; I augmented his tribute. -The fearful splendour of my majesty had overwhelmed him. The -horsemen, soldiers, etc., which he had collected for the fortification -of Jerusalem his royal city, now carried tribute, thirty talents of -gold, eight hundred of silver, scarlet, embroidered woven cloth, large -precious stones, ivory couches and thrones, skins, precious woods; his -daughters, his harem, his male and female slaves, unto Nineveh, my -royal city, after me he sent; and to pay tribute he sent his envoy." - -He then narrates his fourth, fifth, sixth, and seventh campaigns -against Elam, etc. His eighth was against "the children of Babylon, -wicked devils," etc. He ends by describing the splendour of the palace -which he built. - - - VI - -An inscription of ESAR-HADDON, found at Kouyunjik, now in the British -Museum, mentions his receipt of the intelligence of his father's -murder by his unnatural brothers, while he was commanding his fathers -army on the northern confines. - -"From my heart I made a vow. My liver was inflamed with rage. -Immediately I wrote letters, saying I assumed the sovereignty of my -Father's House." He prayed to the gods and goddesses; they encouraged -him, and in spite of a great snowstorm he reached Nineveh, and defeated -his brother, because Istar stood by his side and said to their army, "An -unsparing deity am I" (_Records of the Past_, iii, 100-108). - - - VII - -A terra-cotta cylinder of ASSUR-BANI-PAL (the Sardanapalus of the -Greeks) is now in the British Museum. It is translated by Mr. G. -Smith, _Records of the Past_, i. 55-106, ix. 37-64; Oppert, _Memoire -sur les Rapports de l'Egypte et l'Assyrie_; and G. Smith, _Annals of -Assur-bani-pal_. - -Its most interesting parts relate to the campaign of his father -Esar-haddon against Egypt, and how Tirhakah, King of Egypt and -Ethiopia, reoccupied Memphis. He defeated the army of Tirhakah, who, -to save his life, fled from Memphis to Thebes. The Assyrians then took -Thebes, and restored Necho's father, Psamatik I., to Memphis and Sais, -and other Egyptian kings, friends of Assyria, who had fled before -Tirhakah. The kings, however, proved ungrateful, and made a league -against him. He therefore threw them into fetters, and had them -brought to Nineveh, but subsequently released Necho with splendid -presents. Tirhakah fled to Ethiopia, where he "went to his place of -night"--_i.e._, died. - -FOOTNOTES: - -[918] Up to the time of Tiglath-Pileser II., the Eponym Year (which is -not here given) marks the second complete year of each king's reign. - -[919] This Shalmaneser died about B.C. 825, after a reign of -thirty-five years (Sayce in _Records of the Past_, v. 27-42; Oppert, -_Hist. des Empires de Chaldee et d'Assyrie_; Menant, _Annales des Rois -d'Assyrie_, 1874). - - - - - APPENDIX II - - _INSCRIPTION IN THE TUNNEL OF SILOAM_ - - -The inscription of Siloam is the oldest known Hebrew inscription. "It is -engraved on the rocky wall of the subterranean channel which conveys the -water of the Virgin's Spring at Jerusalem into the Pool of Siloam. In -the summer of 1880 one of the native pupils of Dr. Schick, a German -architect, was playing with other lads in the Pool, and while wading up -the subterranean channel slipped and fell into the water. On rising to -the surface he noticed, in spite of the darkness, what looked like -letters on the rock which formed the southern wall of the channel. Dr. -Schick visited the spot, and found that an ancient inscription, -concealed for the most part by the water, actually existed there." The -level of the water was lowered, but the inscription had been partly -filled up with a deposit of lime, and the first intelligible copy was -made by Professor Sayce in February 1881, and six weeks later by Dr. -Guthe. Professor Sayce had to sit for hours in the mud and water, -working under masonry or earth. There can be little doubt that this work -is alluded to in 2 Kings xx. 20; 2 Chron. xxxii. 30; Isa. viii. 6 ("the -waters of Shiloah ["the tunnel"?] which flow softly"). - -The alphabet is that used by the prophets before the exile, somewhat -like that on the Moabite Stone, and on early Israelitish and Jewish -seals. The language is pure Hebrew, with only one unknown -word--_zadah_, in line three: perhaps "excess" or "obstacle." - -Professor Sayce thinks that it proves that "the City of David" (Zion) -must have been on the southern hill, the so-called Ophel. If so, the -Valley of the Sons of Hinnom must be the rubbish-choked Tyropoeon, -under which must be the tombs of the kings, and the relics of the -Temple and Palace destroyed by Nebuchadrezzar. - -The inscription is:-- - -"The excavation! Now this is the history of the excavation. While the -excavators were lifting up the pick each towards his neighbour, and -while there were yet three cubits [to excavate], there was heard the -voice of one man calling to his neighbour, for there was an excess in -the rock on the right hand [and on the left?]. And after that on the -day of excavating, the excavators had struck pick against pick, one -against another, the water flowed from the spring [_motsa_, "exit," 2 -Chron. xxxii. 30] to the Pool" (that of Siloam, which therefore was -the only one which then existed) "for twelve hundred cubits. And -[part] of a cubit was the height of the rock over the head of the -excavators" (Sayce, _Records of the Past_, i. 169-175). - -The letters are on an artificial tablet cut in the wall of rock, -nineteen feet from where the subterranean conduit opens on the Pool of -Siloam, and on the right-hand side. The conduit is at first sixteen -feet high, but lessens in one place to no more than two feet. It is, -according to Captain Conder, seventeen hundred and eight yards long, -but not in a straight line, as there are two _culs-de-sac_, caused by -faulty engineering. The engineers, beginning, as at Mount Cenis, from -opposite ends, intended to meet in the middle, but failed. The floor -has been rounded to allow the water to flow more easily. It is a -splendid piece of engineering for that age. - -The Pool of Siloam is at the south-east end of a hill which lies to -the south of the Temple hill: the Virgin's Fountain is on the opposite -side of the hill, more to the north, and is the only natural spring or -"Gihon" near Jerusalem, so that its water was of supreme importance. -Being outside the city wall, a conduit was necessary. Hezekiah -"stopped all the fountains" (2 Chron. xxxii. 4)--_i.e._, concealed -them. By providing a subterranean channel for them, he saved them from -the enemy and secured the water-supply of the besieged city. - - - - - APPENDIX III - - _WAS THERE A GOLDEN CALF AT DAN?_ - - -The question might seem absurd, but for its solution I must refer to -my paper on the subject in the _Expositor_ for October 1893. - -The _sole_ authorities for a calf at Dan are 1 Kings xii. 28-30; 2 Kings -x. 29. If in the former passage we alter _one letter_, and read [Hebrew: -hfd] (the "ephod") for [Hebrew: hchd] (the "one")--as Klostermann -suggests--we throw light on an obscure and perhaps corrupt passage. The -allusion then would be to Micah's old idolatrous image (which _may_ have -been a calf) at Dan. The two words "and in Dan" in 2 Kings x. 29 may -easily have been (as Klostermann thinks) an exegetical gloss added from -the error of one letter in 1 Kings xii. 30. - -Dan was a most unlikely place to select: for (1) It was a remote -frontier town; and (2) there was no room, and no necessity there, for -a new cultus beside the ancient one established some centuries -earlier, and still served by priests who were direct lineal -descendants of Moses (Judg. xviii. 30, 31). - -This would further account for the absolute silence of prophets and -historians about any golden calf at Dan; and it adds to the inherent -probability, also supported by some evidence, that there were _two_ -cherubic calves at Bethel. - -For further arguments I must refer to my paper. - - - - - APPENDIX IV - - _DATES OF THE KINGS OF ISRAEL AND JUDAH, AS - GIVEN BY KITTEL AND OTHER MODERN CRITICS[920]_ - - - ISRAEL - - B.C. - - Ahaziah 855-854 - Jehoram 854-842 - Jehu 842-814 - Jehoahaz 814-797 - Joash 797-781 - Jeroboam II. 781-740 - Zachariah 740 - Shallum 740 - Menahem 740-737 - Pekahiah 737-735 - Pekah 735-734 - Hoshea 734-725 - - - JUDAH - - B.C. - - Jehoram ben-Jehoshaphat 851-843 - Ahaziah ben-Jehoram 843-842 - Athaliah 842-836 - Joash ben-Ahaziah 836-796 - Amaziah 796-783 - Amaziah-Uzziah 783-737 - Jotham 737-735 - Ahaz 735-715 - Hezekiah 715-686 - - Manasseh 686-641 - Amon 641-639 - Josiah 639-608 - Jehoahaz 608 - Jehoiakim 608-597 - Jehoiachin 597 - Zedekiah 597-586 - -FOOTNOTE: - -[920] Many of these dates can only be regarded as uncertain and -approximate. Kamphausen dates the commencement of all the latter kings -a year later (_Die Chronologie der hebraeischen Koenige_, Bonn, 1883). - - - - -Transcriber's Notes: - - -Obvious punctuation and spelling errors have been fixed throughout. - -Non-Latin characters have been replaced with the nearest Latin -equivalent for example oe (the oe ligature), was replaced with oe. - -Inconsistent hyphenation left as in the original text. - -Missing footnote anchors have been placed, when possible to determine -placement. - -Footnote 198: Greek has been corrected to add accents. - -Footnote 215: Greek has been corrected. - - - - - - -End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The Expositor's Bible, by F. W. Farrar - -*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE EXPOSITOR'S BIBLE *** - -***** This file should be named 42027.txt or 42027.zip ***** -This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: - http://www.gutenberg.org/4/2/0/2/42027/ - -Produced by Douglas L. Alley, III, Colin Bell and the -Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net -(This file was produced from images generously made -available by The Internet Archive) - - -Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions -will be renamed. - -Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no -one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation -(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without -permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, -set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to -copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to -protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project -Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you -charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you -do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the -rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose -such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and -research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do -practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is -subject to the trademark license, especially commercial -redistribution. - - - -*** START: FULL LICENSE *** - -THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE -PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK - -To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free -distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work -(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project -Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project -Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at - www.gutenberg.org/license. - - -Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic works - -1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to -and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property -(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all -the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy -all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. -If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the -terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or -entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. - -1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be -used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who -agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few -things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works -even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See -paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement -and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. See paragraph 1.E below. - -1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" -or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the -collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an -individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are -located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from -copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative -works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg -are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project -Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by -freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of -this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with -the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by -keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project -Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. - -1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern -what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in -a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check -the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement -before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or -creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project -Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning -the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United -States. - -1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: - -1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate -access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently -whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the -phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project -Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, -copied or distributed: - -This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with -almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or -re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included -with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org - -1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived -from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is -posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied -and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees -or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work -with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the -work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 -through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the -Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or -1.E.9. - -1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted -with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution -must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional -terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked -to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the -permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. - -1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this -work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. - -1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this -electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without -prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with -active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project -Gutenberg-tm License. - -1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, -compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any -word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or -distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than -"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version -posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), -you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a -copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon -request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other -form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm -License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. - -1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, -performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works -unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. - -1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing -access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided -that - -- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from - the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method - you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is - owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he - has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the - Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments - must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you - prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax - returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and - sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the - address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to - the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." - -- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies - you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he - does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm - License. You must require such a user to return or - destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium - and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of - Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any - money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the - electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days - of receipt of the work. - -- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free - distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. - -1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm -electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set -forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from -both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael -Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the -Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. - -1.F. - -1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable -effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread -public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm -collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain -"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or -corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual -property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a -computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by -your equipment. - -1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right -of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project -Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project -Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all -liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal -fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT -LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE -PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE -TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE -LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR -INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH -DAMAGE. - -1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a -defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can -receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a -written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you -received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with -your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with -the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a -refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity -providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to -receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy -is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further -opportunities to fix the problem. - -1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth -in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER -WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO -WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. - -1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied -warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. -If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the -law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be -interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by -the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any -provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. - -1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the -trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone -providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance -with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, -promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, -harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, -that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do -or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm -work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any -Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. - - -Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm - -Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of -electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers -including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists -because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from -people in all walks of life. - -Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the -assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's -goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will -remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project -Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure -and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. -To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation -and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 -and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org - - -Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive -Foundation - -The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit -501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the -state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal -Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification -number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent -permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. - -The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. -Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered -throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 -North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email -contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the -Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact - -For additional contact information: - Dr. Gregory B. Newby - Chief Executive and Director - gbnewby@pglaf.org - -Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg -Literary Archive Foundation - -Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide -spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of -increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be -freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest -array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations -($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt -status with the IRS. - -The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating -charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United -States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a -considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up -with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations -where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To -SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any -particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate - -While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we -have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition -against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who -approach us with offers to donate. - -International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make -any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from -outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. - -Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation -methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other -ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. -To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate - - -Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic -works. - -Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm -concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared -with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project -Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. - -Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed -editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. -unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily -keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. - -Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: - - www.gutenberg.org - -This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, -including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary -Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to -subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. diff --git a/old/42027.zip b/old/42027.zip Binary files differdeleted file mode 100644 index 2199676..0000000 --- a/old/42027.zip +++ /dev/null diff --git a/old/readme.htm b/old/readme.htm deleted file mode 100644 index 33c1959..0000000 --- a/old/readme.htm +++ /dev/null @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ -<!DOCTYPE html> -<html lang="en"> -<head> - <meta charset="utf-8"> -</head> -<body> -<div> -Versions of this book's files up to October 2024 are here.<br> -More recent changes, if any, are reflected in the GitHub repository: -<a href="https://github.com/gutenbergbooks/42027">https://github.com/gutenbergbooks/42027</a> -</div> -</body> -</html> |
