summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/26319-h/26319-h.htm
blob: d8a1b002bd08b06e37d86a9e4db0dc997603b036 (plain) 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
1885
1886
1887
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
2073
2074
2075
2076
2077
2078
2079
2080
2081
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090
2091
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2110
2111
2112
2113
2114
2115
2116
2117
2118
2119
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
2127
2128
2129
2130
2131
2132
2133
2134
2135
2136
2137
2138
2139
2140
2141
2142
2143
2144
2145
2146
2147
2148
2149
2150
2151
2152
2153
2154
2155
2156
2157
2158
2159
2160
2161
2162
2163
2164
2165
2166
2167
2168
2169
2170
2171
2172
2173
2174
2175
2176
2177
2178
2179
2180
2181
2182
2183
2184
2185
2186
2187
2188
2189
2190
2191
2192
2193
2194
2195
2196
2197
2198
2199
2200
2201
2202
2203
2204
2205
2206
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2230
2231
2232
2233
2234
2235
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
2253
2254
2255
2256
2257
2258
2259
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272
2273
2274
2275
2276
2277
2278
2279
2280
2281
2282
2283
2284
2285
2286
2287
2288
2289
2290
2291
2292
2293
2294
2295
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2319
2320
2321
2322
2323
2324
2325
2326
2327
2328
2329
2330
2331
2332
2333
2334
2335
2336
2337
2338
2339
2340
2341
2342
2343
2344
2345
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
2353
2354
2355
2356
2357
2358
2359
2360
2361
2362
2363
2364
2365
2366
2367
2368
2369
2370
2371
2372
2373
2374
2375
2376
2377
2378
2379
2380
2381
2382
2383
2384
2385
2386
2387
2388
2389
2390
2391
2392
2393
2394
2395
2396
2397
2398
2399
2400
2401
2402
2403
2404
2405
2406
2407
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413
2414
2415
2416
2417
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425
2426
2427
2428
2429
2430
2431
2432
2433
2434
2435
2436
2437
2438
2439
2440
2441
2442
2443
2444
2445
2446
2447
2448
2449
2450
2451
2452
2453
2454
2455
2456
2457
2458
2459
2460
2461
2462
2463
2464
2465
2466
2467
2468
2469
2470
2471
2472
2473
2474
2475
2476
2477
2478
2479
2480
2481
2482
2483
2484
2485
2486
2487
2488
2489
2490
2491
2492
2493
2494
2495
2496
2497
2498
2499
2500
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506
2507
2508
2509
2510
2511
2512
2513
2514
2515
2516
2517
2518
2519
2520
2521
2522
2523
2524
2525
2526
2527
2528
2529
2530
2531
2532
2533
2534
2535
2536
2537
2538
2539
2540
2541
2542
2543
2544
2545
2546
2547
2548
2549
2550
2551
2552
2553
2554
2555
2556
2557
2558
2559
2560
2561
2562
2563
2564
2565
2566
2567
2568
2569
2570
2571
2572
2573
2574
2575
2576
2577
2578
2579
2580
2581
2582
2583
2584
2585
2586
2587
2588
2589
2590
2591
2592
2593
2594
2595
2596
2597
2598
2599
2600
2601
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2611
2612
2613
2614
2615
2616
2617
2618
2619
2620
2621
2622
2623
2624
2625
2626
2627
2628
2629
2630
2631
2632
2633
2634
2635
2636
2637
2638
2639
2640
2641
2642
2643
2644
2645
2646
2647
2648
2649
2650
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
2656
2657
2658
2659
2660
2661
2662
2663
2664
2665
2666
2667
2668
2669
2670
2671
2672
2673
2674
2675
2676
2677
2678
2679
2680
2681
2682
2683
2684
2685
2686
2687
2688
2689
2690
2691
2692
2693
2694
2695
2696
2697
2698
2699
2700
2701
2702
2703
2704
2705
2706
2707
2708
2709
2710
2711
2712
2713
2714
2715
2716
2717
2718
2719
2720
2721
2722
2723
2724
2725
2726
2727
2728
2729
2730
2731
2732
2733
2734
2735
2736
2737
2738
2739
2740
2741
2742
2743
2744
2745
2746
2747
2748
2749
2750
2751
2752
2753
2754
2755
2756
2757
2758
2759
2760
2761
2762
2763
2764
2765
2766
2767
2768
2769
2770
2771
2772
2773
2774
2775
2776
2777
2778
2779
2780
2781
2782
2783
2784
2785
2786
2787
2788
2789
2790
2791
2792
2793
2794
2795
2796
2797
2798
2799
2800
2801
2802
2803
2804
2805
2806
2807
2808
2809
2810
2811
2812
2813
2814
2815
2816
2817
2818
2819
2820
2821
2822
2823
2824
2825
2826
2827
2828
2829
2830
2831
2832
2833
2834
2835
2836
2837
2838
2839
2840
2841
2842
2843
2844
2845
2846
2847
2848
2849
2850
2851
2852
2853
2854
2855
2856
2857
2858
2859
2860
2861
2862
2863
2864
2865
2866
2867
2868
2869
2870
2871
2872
2873
2874
2875
2876
2877
2878
2879
2880
2881
2882
2883
2884
2885
2886
2887
2888
2889
2890
2891
2892
2893
2894
2895
2896
2897
2898
2899
2900
2901
2902
2903
2904
2905
2906
2907
2908
2909
2910
2911
2912
2913
2914
2915
2916
2917
2918
2919
2920
2921
2922
2923
2924
2925
2926
2927
2928
2929
2930
2931
2932
2933
2934
2935
2936
2937
2938
2939
2940
2941
2942
2943
2944
2945
2946
2947
2948
2949
2950
2951
2952
2953
2954
2955
2956
2957
2958
2959
2960
2961
2962
2963
2964
2965
2966
2967
2968
2969
2970
2971
2972
2973
2974
2975
2976
2977
2978
2979
2980
2981
2982
2983
2984
2985
2986
2987
2988
2989
2990
2991
2992
2993
2994
2995
2996
2997
2998
2999
3000
3001
3002
3003
3004
3005
3006
3007
3008
3009
3010
3011
3012
3013
3014
3015
3016
3017
3018
3019
3020
3021
3022
3023
3024
3025
3026
3027
3028
3029
3030
3031
3032
3033
3034
3035
3036
3037
3038
3039
3040
3041
3042
3043
3044
3045
3046
3047
3048
3049
3050
3051
3052
3053
3054
3055
3056
3057
3058
3059
3060
3061
3062
3063
3064
3065
3066
3067
3068
3069
3070
3071
3072
3073
3074
3075
3076
3077
3078
3079
3080
3081
3082
3083
3084
3085
3086
3087
3088
3089
3090
3091
3092
3093
3094
3095
3096
3097
3098
3099
3100
3101
3102
3103
3104
3105
3106
3107
3108
3109
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
3116
3117
3118
3119
3120
3121
3122
3123
3124
3125
3126
3127
3128
3129
3130
3131
3132
3133
3134
3135
3136
3137
3138
3139
3140
3141
3142
3143
3144
3145
3146
3147
3148
3149
3150
3151
3152
3153
3154
3155
3156
3157
3158
3159
3160
3161
3162
3163
3164
3165
3166
3167
3168
3169
3170
3171
3172
3173
3174
3175
3176
3177
3178
3179
3180
3181
3182
3183
3184
3185
3186
3187
3188
3189
3190
3191
3192
3193
3194
3195
3196
3197
3198
3199
3200
3201
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
3207
3208
3209
3210
3211
3212
3213
3214
3215
3216
3217
3218
3219
3220
3221
3222
3223
3224
3225
3226
3227
3228
3229
3230
3231
3232
3233
3234
3235
3236
3237
3238
3239
3240
3241
3242
3243
3244
3245
3246
3247
3248
3249
3250
3251
3252
3253
3254
3255
3256
3257
3258
3259
3260
3261
3262
3263
3264
3265
3266
3267
3268
3269
3270
3271
3272
3273
3274
3275
3276
3277
3278
3279
3280
3281
3282
3283
3284
3285
3286
3287
3288
3289
3290
3291
3292
3293
3294
3295
3296
3297
3298
3299
3300
3301
3302
3303
3304
3305
3306
3307
3308
3309
3310
3311
3312
3313
3314
3315
3316
3317
3318
3319
3320
3321
3322
3323
3324
3325
3326
3327
3328
3329
3330
3331
3332
3333
3334
3335
3336
3337
3338
3339
3340
3341
3342
3343
3344
3345
3346
3347
3348
3349
3350
3351
3352
3353
3354
3355
3356
3357
3358
3359
3360
3361
3362
3363
3364
3365
3366
3367
3368
3369
3370
3371
3372
3373
3374
3375
3376
3377
3378
3379
3380
3381
3382
3383
3384
3385
3386
3387
3388
3389
3390
3391
3392
3393
3394
3395
3396
3397
3398
3399
3400
3401
3402
3403
3404
3405
3406
3407
3408
3409
3410
3411
3412
3413
3414
3415
3416
3417
3418
3419
3420
3421
3422
3423
3424
3425
3426
3427
3428
3429
3430
3431
3432
3433
3434
3435
3436
3437
3438
3439
3440
3441
3442
3443
3444
3445
3446
3447
3448
3449
3450
3451
3452
3453
3454
3455
3456
3457
3458
3459
3460
3461
3462
3463
3464
3465
3466
3467
3468
3469
3470
3471
3472
3473
3474
3475
3476
3477
3478
3479
3480
3481
3482
3483
3484
3485
3486
3487
3488
3489
3490
3491
3492
3493
3494
3495
3496
3497
3498
3499
3500
3501
3502
3503
3504
3505
3506
3507
3508
3509
3510
3511
3512
3513
3514
3515
3516
3517
3518
3519
3520
3521
3522
3523
3524
3525
3526
3527
3528
3529
3530
3531
3532
3533
3534
3535
3536
3537
3538
3539
3540
3541
3542
3543
3544
3545
3546
3547
3548
3549
3550
3551
3552
3553
3554
3555
3556
3557
3558
3559
3560
3561
3562
3563
3564
3565
3566
3567
3568
3569
3570
3571
3572
3573
3574
3575
3576
3577
3578
3579
3580
3581
3582
3583
3584
3585
3586
3587
3588
3589
3590
3591
3592
3593
3594
3595
3596
3597
3598
3599
3600
3601
3602
3603
3604
3605
3606
3607
3608
3609
3610
3611
3612
3613
3614
3615
3616
3617
3618
3619
3620
3621
3622
3623
3624
3625
3626
3627
3628
3629
3630
3631
3632
3633
3634
3635
3636
3637
3638
3639
3640
3641
3642
3643
3644
3645
3646
3647
3648
3649
3650
3651
3652
3653
3654
3655
3656
3657
3658
3659
3660
3661
3662
3663
3664
3665
3666
3667
3668
3669
3670
3671
3672
3673
3674
3675
3676
3677
3678
3679
3680
3681
3682
3683
3684
3685
3686
3687
3688
3689
3690
3691
3692
3693
3694
3695
3696
3697
3698
3699
3700
3701
3702
3703
3704
3705
3706
3707
3708
3709
3710
3711
3712
3713
3714
3715
3716
3717
3718
3719
3720
3721
3722
3723
3724
3725
3726
3727
3728
3729
3730
3731
3732
3733
3734
3735
3736
3737
3738
3739
3740
3741
3742
3743
3744
3745
3746
3747
3748
3749
3750
3751
3752
3753
3754
3755
3756
3757
3758
3759
3760
3761
3762
3763
3764
3765
3766
3767
3768
3769
3770
3771
3772
3773
3774
3775
3776
3777
3778
3779
3780
3781
3782
3783
3784
3785
3786
3787
3788
3789
3790
3791
3792
3793
3794
3795
3796
3797
3798
3799
3800
3801
3802
3803
3804
3805
3806
3807
3808
3809
3810
3811
3812
3813
3814
3815
3816
3817
3818
3819
3820
3821
3822
3823
3824
3825
3826
3827
3828
3829
3830
3831
3832
3833
3834
3835
3836
3837
3838
3839
3840
3841
3842
3843
3844
3845
3846
3847
3848
3849
3850
3851
3852
3853
3854
3855
3856
3857
3858
3859
3860
3861
3862
3863
3864
3865
3866
3867
3868
3869
3870
3871
3872
3873
3874
3875
3876
3877
3878
3879
3880
3881
3882
3883
3884
3885
3886
3887
3888
3889
3890
3891
3892
3893
3894
3895
3896
3897
3898
3899
3900
3901
3902
3903
3904
3905
3906
3907
3908
3909
3910
3911
3912
3913
3914
3915
3916
3917
3918
3919
3920
3921
3922
3923
3924
3925
3926
3927
3928
3929
3930
3931
3932
3933
3934
3935
3936
3937
3938
3939
3940
3941
3942
3943
3944
3945
3946
3947
3948
3949
3950
3951
3952
3953
3954
3955
3956
3957
3958
3959
3960
3961
3962
3963
3964
3965
3966
3967
3968
3969
3970
3971
3972
3973
3974
3975
3976
3977
3978
3979
3980
3981
3982
3983
3984
3985
3986
3987
3988
3989
3990
3991
3992
3993
3994
3995
3996
3997
3998
3999
4000
4001
4002
4003
4004
4005
4006
4007
4008
4009
4010
4011
4012
4013
4014
4015
4016
4017
4018
4019
4020
4021
4022
4023
4024
4025
4026
4027
4028
4029
4030
4031
4032
4033
4034
4035
4036
4037
4038
4039
4040
4041
4042
4043
4044
4045
4046
4047
4048
4049
4050
4051
4052
4053
4054
4055
4056
4057
4058
4059
4060
4061
4062
4063
4064
4065
4066
4067
4068
4069
4070
4071
4072
4073
4074
4075
4076
4077
4078
4079
4080
4081
4082
4083
4084
4085
4086
4087
4088
4089
4090
4091
4092
4093
4094
4095
4096
4097
4098
4099
4100
4101
4102
4103
4104
4105
4106
4107
4108
4109
4110
4111
4112
4113
4114
4115
4116
4117
4118
4119
4120
4121
4122
4123
4124
4125
4126
4127
4128
4129
4130
4131
4132
4133
4134
4135
4136
4137
4138
4139
4140
4141
4142
4143
4144
4145
4146
4147
4148
4149
4150
4151
4152
4153
4154
4155
4156
4157
4158
4159
4160
4161
4162
4163
4164
4165
4166
4167
4168
4169
4170
4171
4172
4173
4174
4175
4176
4177
4178
4179
4180
4181
4182
4183
4184
4185
4186
4187
4188
4189
4190
4191
4192
4193
4194
4195
4196
4197
4198
4199
4200
4201
4202
4203
4204
4205
4206
4207
4208
4209
4210
4211
4212
4213
4214
4215
4216
4217
4218
4219
4220
4221
4222
4223
4224
4225
4226
4227
4228
4229
4230
4231
4232
4233
4234
4235
4236
4237
4238
4239
4240
4241
4242
4243
4244
4245
4246
4247
4248
4249
4250
4251
4252
4253
4254
4255
4256
4257
4258
4259
4260
4261
4262
4263
4264
4265
4266
4267
4268
4269
4270
4271
4272
4273
4274
4275
4276
4277
4278
4279
4280
4281
4282
4283
4284
4285
4286
4287
4288
4289
4290
4291
4292
4293
4294
4295
4296
4297
4298
4299
4300
4301
4302
4303
4304
4305
4306
4307
4308
4309
4310
4311
4312
4313
4314
4315
4316
4317
4318
4319
4320
4321
4322
4323
4324
4325
4326
4327
4328
4329
4330
4331
4332
4333
4334
4335
4336
4337
4338
4339
4340
4341
4342
4343
4344
4345
4346
4347
4348
4349
4350
4351
4352
4353
4354
4355
4356
4357
4358
4359
4360
4361
4362
4363
4364
4365
4366
4367
4368
4369
4370
4371
4372
4373
4374
4375
4376
4377
4378
4379
4380
4381
4382
4383
4384
4385
4386
4387
4388
4389
4390
4391
4392
4393
4394
4395
4396
4397
4398
4399
4400
4401
4402
4403
4404
4405
4406
4407
4408
4409
4410
4411
4412
4413
4414
4415
4416
4417
4418
4419
4420
4421
4422
4423
4424
4425
4426
4427
4428
4429
4430
4431
4432
4433
4434
4435
4436
4437
4438
4439
4440
4441
4442
4443
4444
4445
4446
4447
4448
4449
4450
4451
4452
4453
4454
4455
4456
4457
4458
4459
4460
4461
4462
4463
4464
4465
4466
4467
4468
4469
4470
4471
4472
4473
4474
4475
4476
4477
4478
4479
4480
4481
4482
4483
4484
4485
4486
4487
4488
4489
4490
4491
4492
4493
4494
4495
4496
4497
4498
4499
4500
4501
4502
4503
4504
4505
4506
4507
4508
4509
4510
4511
4512
4513
4514
4515
4516
4517
4518
4519
4520
4521
4522
4523
4524
4525
4526
4527
4528
4529
4530
4531
4532
4533
4534
4535
4536
4537
4538
4539
4540
4541
4542
4543
4544
4545
4546
4547
4548
4549
4550
4551
4552
4553
4554
4555
4556
4557
4558
4559
4560
4561
4562
4563
4564
4565
4566
4567
4568
4569
4570
4571
4572
4573
4574
4575
4576
4577
4578
4579
4580
4581
4582
4583
4584
4585
4586
4587
4588
4589
4590
4591
4592
4593
4594
4595
4596
4597
4598
4599
4600
4601
4602
4603
4604
4605
4606
4607
4608
4609
4610
4611
4612
4613
4614
4615
4616
4617
4618
4619
4620
4621
4622
4623
4624
4625
4626
4627
4628
4629
4630
4631
4632
4633
4634
4635
4636
4637
4638
4639
4640
4641
4642
4643
4644
4645
4646
4647
4648
4649
4650
4651
4652
4653
4654
4655
4656
4657
4658
4659
4660
4661
4662
4663
4664
4665
4666
4667
4668
4669
4670
4671
4672
4673
4674
4675
4676
4677
4678
4679
4680
4681
4682
4683
4684
4685
4686
4687
4688
4689
4690
4691
4692
4693
4694
4695
4696
4697
4698
4699
4700
4701
4702
4703
4704
4705
4706
4707
4708
4709
4710
4711
4712
4713
4714
4715
4716
4717
4718
4719
4720
4721
4722
4723
4724
4725
4726
4727
4728
4729
4730
4731
4732
4733
4734
4735
4736
4737
4738
4739
4740
4741
4742
4743
4744
4745
4746
4747
4748
4749
4750
4751
4752
4753
4754
4755
4756
4757
4758
4759
4760
4761
4762
4763
4764
4765
4766
4767
4768
4769
4770
4771
4772
4773
4774
4775
4776
4777
4778
4779
4780
4781
4782
4783
4784
4785
4786
4787
4788
4789
4790
4791
4792
4793
4794
4795
4796
4797
4798
4799
4800
4801
4802
4803
4804
4805
4806
4807
4808
4809
4810
4811
4812
4813
4814
4815
4816
4817
4818
4819
4820
4821
4822
4823
4824
4825
4826
4827
4828
4829
4830
4831
4832
4833
4834
4835
4836
4837
4838
4839
4840
4841
4842
4843
4844
4845
4846
4847
4848
4849
4850
4851
4852
4853
4854
4855
4856
4857
4858
4859
4860
4861
4862
4863
4864
4865
4866
4867
4868
4869
4870
4871
4872
4873
4874
4875
4876
4877
4878
4879
4880
4881
4882
4883
4884
4885
4886
4887
4888
4889
4890
4891
4892
4893
4894
4895
4896
4897
4898
4899
4900
4901
4902
4903
4904
4905
4906
4907
4908
4909
4910
4911
4912
4913
4914
4915
4916
4917
4918
4919
4920
4921
4922
4923
4924
4925
4926
4927
4928
4929
4930
4931
4932
4933
4934
4935
4936
4937
4938
4939
4940
4941
4942
4943
4944
4945
4946
4947
4948
4949
4950
4951
4952
4953
4954
4955
4956
4957
4958
4959
4960
4961
4962
4963
4964
4965
4966
4967
4968
4969
4970
4971
4972
4973
4974
4975
4976
4977
4978
4979
4980
4981
4982
4983
4984
4985
4986
4987
4988
4989
4990
4991
4992
4993
4994
4995
4996
4997
4998
4999
5000
5001
5002
5003
5004
5005
5006
5007
5008
5009
5010
5011
5012
5013
5014
5015
5016
5017
5018
5019
5020
5021
5022
5023
5024
5025
5026
5027
5028
5029
5030
5031
5032
5033
5034
5035
5036
5037
5038
5039
5040
5041
5042
5043
5044
5045
5046
5047
5048
5049
5050
5051
5052
5053
5054
5055
5056
5057
5058
5059
5060
5061
5062
5063
5064
5065
5066
5067
5068
5069
5070
5071
5072
5073
5074
5075
5076
5077
5078
5079
5080
5081
5082
5083
5084
5085
5086
5087
5088
5089
5090
5091
5092
5093
5094
5095
5096
5097
5098
5099
5100
5101
5102
5103
5104
5105
5106
5107
5108
5109
5110
5111
5112
5113
5114
5115
5116
5117
5118
5119
5120
5121
5122
5123
5124
5125
5126
5127
5128
5129
5130
5131
5132
5133
5134
5135
5136
5137
5138
5139
5140
5141
5142
5143
5144
5145
5146
5147
5148
5149
5150
5151
5152
5153
5154
5155
5156
5157
5158
5159
5160
5161
5162
5163
5164
5165
5166
5167
5168
5169
5170
5171
5172
5173
5174
5175
5176
5177
5178
5179
5180
5181
5182
5183
5184
5185
5186
5187
5188
5189
5190
5191
5192
5193
5194
5195
5196
5197
5198
5199
5200
5201
5202
5203
5204
5205
5206
5207
5208
5209
5210
5211
5212
5213
5214
5215
5216
5217
5218
5219
5220
5221
5222
5223
5224
5225
5226
5227
5228
5229
5230
5231
5232
5233
5234
5235
5236
5237
5238
5239
5240
5241
5242
5243
5244
5245
5246
5247
5248
5249
5250
5251
5252
5253
5254
5255
5256
5257
5258
5259
5260
5261
5262
5263
5264
5265
5266
5267
5268
5269
5270
5271
5272
5273
5274
5275
5276
5277
5278
5279
5280
5281
5282
5283
5284
5285
5286
5287
5288
5289
5290
5291
5292
5293
5294
5295
5296
5297
5298
5299
5300
5301
5302
5303
5304
5305
5306
5307
5308
5309
5310
5311
5312
5313
5314
5315
5316
5317
5318
5319
5320
5321
5322
5323
5324
5325
5326
5327
5328
5329
5330
5331
5332
5333
5334
5335
5336
5337
5338
5339
5340
5341
5342
5343
5344
5345
5346
5347
5348
5349
5350
5351
5352
5353
5354
5355
5356
5357
5358
5359
5360
5361
5362
5363
5364
5365
5366
5367
5368
5369
5370
5371
5372
5373
5374
5375
5376
5377
5378
5379
5380
5381
5382
5383
5384
5385
5386
5387
5388
5389
5390
5391
5392
5393
5394
5395
5396
5397
5398
5399
5400
5401
5402
5403
5404
5405
5406
5407
5408
5409
5410
5411
5412
5413
5414
5415
5416
5417
5418
5419
5420
5421
5422
5423
5424
5425
5426
5427
5428
5429
5430
5431
5432
5433
5434
5435
5436
5437
5438
5439
5440
5441
5442
5443
5444
5445
5446
5447
5448
5449
5450
5451
5452
5453
5454
5455
5456
5457
5458
5459
5460
5461
5462
5463
5464
5465
5466
5467
5468
5469
5470
5471
5472
5473
5474
5475
5476
5477
5478
5479
5480
5481
5482
5483
5484
5485
5486
5487
5488
5489
5490
5491
5492
5493
5494
5495
5496
5497
5498
5499
5500
5501
5502
5503
5504
5505
5506
5507
5508
5509
5510
5511
5512
5513
5514
5515
5516
5517
5518
5519
5520
5521
5522
5523
5524
5525
5526
5527
5528
5529
5530
5531
5532
5533
5534
5535
5536
5537
5538
5539
5540
5541
5542
5543
5544
5545
5546
5547
5548
5549
5550
5551
5552
5553
5554
5555
5556
5557
5558
5559
5560
5561
5562
5563
5564
5565
5566
5567
5568
5569
5570
5571
5572
5573
5574
5575
5576
5577
5578
5579
5580
5581
5582
5583
5584
5585
5586
5587
5588
5589
5590
5591
5592
5593
5594
5595
5596
5597
5598
5599
5600
5601
5602
5603
5604
5605
5606
5607
5608
5609
5610
5611
5612
5613
5614
5615
5616
5617
5618
5619
5620
5621
5622
5623
5624
5625
5626
5627
5628
5629
5630
5631
5632
5633
5634
5635
5636
5637
5638
5639
5640
5641
5642
5643
5644
5645
5646
5647
5648
5649
5650
5651
5652
5653
5654
5655
5656
5657
5658
5659
5660
5661
5662
5663
5664
5665
5666
5667
5668
5669
5670
5671
5672
5673
5674
5675
5676
5677
5678
5679
5680
5681
5682
5683
5684
5685
5686
5687
5688
5689
5690
5691
5692
5693
5694
5695
5696
5697
5698
5699
5700
5701
5702
5703
5704
5705
5706
5707
5708
5709
5710
5711
5712
5713
5714
5715
5716
5717
5718
5719
5720
5721
5722
5723
5724
5725
5726
5727
5728
5729
5730
5731
5732
5733
5734
5735
5736
5737
5738
5739
5740
5741
5742
5743
5744
5745
5746
5747
5748
5749
5750
5751
5752
5753
5754
5755
5756
5757
5758
5759
5760
5761
5762
5763
5764
5765
5766
5767
5768
5769
5770
5771
5772
5773
5774
5775
5776
5777
5778
5779
5780
5781
5782
5783
5784
5785
5786
5787
5788
5789
5790
5791
5792
5793
5794
5795
5796
5797
5798
5799
5800
5801
5802
5803
5804
5805
5806
5807
5808
5809
5810
5811
5812
5813
5814
5815
5816
5817
5818
5819
5820
5821
5822
5823
5824
5825
5826
5827
5828
5829
5830
5831
5832
5833
5834
5835
5836
5837
5838
5839
5840
5841
5842
5843
5844
5845
5846
5847
5848
5849
5850
5851
5852
5853
5854
5855
5856
5857
5858
5859
5860
5861
5862
5863
5864
5865
5866
5867
5868
5869
5870
5871
5872
5873
5874
5875
5876
5877
5878
5879
5880
5881
5882
5883
5884
5885
5886
5887
5888
5889
5890
5891
5892
5893
5894
5895
5896
5897
5898
5899
5900
5901
5902
5903
5904
5905
5906
5907
5908
5909
5910
5911
5912
5913
5914
5915
5916
5917
5918
5919
5920
5921
5922
5923
5924
5925
5926
5927
5928
5929
5930
5931
5932
5933
5934
5935
5936
5937
5938
5939
5940
5941
5942
5943
5944
5945
5946
5947
5948
5949
5950
5951
5952
5953
5954
5955
5956
5957
5958
5959
5960
5961
5962
5963
5964
5965
5966
5967
5968
5969
5970
5971
5972
5973
5974
5975
5976
5977
5978
5979
5980
5981
5982
5983
5984
5985
5986
5987
5988
5989
5990
5991
5992
5993
5994
5995
5996
5997
5998
5999
6000
6001
6002
6003
6004
6005
6006
6007
6008
6009
6010
6011
6012
6013
6014
6015
6016
6017
6018
6019
6020
6021
6022
6023
6024
6025
6026
6027
6028
6029
6030
6031
6032
6033
6034
6035
6036
6037
6038
6039
6040
6041
6042
6043
6044
6045
6046
6047
6048
6049
6050
6051
6052
6053
6054
6055
6056
6057
6058
6059
6060
6061
6062
6063
6064
6065
6066
6067
6068
6069
6070
6071
6072
6073
6074
6075
6076
6077
6078
6079
6080
6081
6082
6083
6084
6085
6086
6087
6088
6089
6090
6091
6092
6093
6094
6095
6096
6097
6098
6099
6100
6101
6102
6103
6104
6105
6106
6107
6108
6109
6110
6111
6112
6113
6114
6115
6116
6117
6118
6119
6120
6121
6122
6123
6124
6125
6126
6127
6128
6129
6130
6131
6132
6133
6134
6135
6136
6137
6138
6139
6140
6141
6142
6143
6144
6145
6146
6147
6148
6149
6150
6151
6152
6153
6154
6155
6156
6157
6158
6159
6160
6161
6162
6163
6164
6165
6166
6167
6168
6169
6170
6171
6172
6173
6174
6175
6176
6177
6178
6179
6180
6181
6182
6183
6184
6185
6186
6187
6188
6189
6190
6191
6192
6193
6194
6195
6196
6197
6198
6199
6200
6201
6202
6203
6204
6205
6206
6207
6208
6209
6210
6211
6212
6213
6214
6215
6216
6217
6218
6219
6220
6221
6222
6223
6224
6225
6226
6227
6228
6229
6230
6231
6232
6233
6234
6235
6236
6237
6238
6239
6240
6241
6242
6243
6244
6245
6246
6247
6248
6249
6250
6251
6252
6253
6254
6255
6256
6257
6258
6259
6260
6261
6262
6263
6264
6265
6266
6267
6268
6269
6270
6271
6272
6273
6274
6275
6276
6277
6278
6279
6280
6281
6282
6283
6284
6285
6286
6287
6288
6289
6290
6291
6292
6293
6294
6295
6296
6297
6298
6299
6300
6301
6302
6303
6304
6305
6306
6307
6308
6309
6310
6311
6312
6313
6314
6315
6316
6317
6318
6319
6320
6321
6322
6323
6324
6325
6326
6327
6328
6329
6330
6331
6332
6333
6334
6335
6336
6337
6338
6339
6340
6341
6342
6343
6344
6345
6346
6347
6348
6349
6350
6351
6352
6353
6354
6355
6356
6357
6358
6359
6360
6361
6362
6363
6364
6365
6366
6367
6368
6369
6370
6371
6372
6373
6374
6375
6376
6377
6378
6379
6380
6381
6382
6383
6384
6385
6386
6387
6388
6389
6390
6391
6392
6393
6394
6395
6396
6397
6398
6399
6400
6401
6402
6403
6404
6405
6406
6407
6408
6409
6410
6411
6412
6413
6414
6415
6416
6417
6418
6419
6420
6421
6422
6423
6424
6425
6426
6427
6428
6429
6430
6431
6432
6433
6434
6435
6436
6437
6438
6439
6440
6441
6442
6443
6444
6445
6446
6447
6448
6449
6450
6451
6452
6453
6454
6455
6456
6457
6458
6459
6460
6461
6462
6463
6464
6465
6466
6467
6468
6469
6470
6471
6472
6473
6474
6475
6476
6477
6478
6479
6480
6481
6482
6483
6484
6485
6486
6487
6488
6489
6490
6491
6492
6493
6494
6495
6496
6497
6498
6499
6500
6501
6502
6503
6504
6505
6506
6507
6508
6509
6510
6511
6512
6513
6514
6515
6516
6517
6518
6519
6520
6521
6522
6523
6524
6525
6526
6527
6528
6529
6530
6531
6532
6533
6534
6535
6536
6537
6538
6539
6540
6541
6542
6543
6544
6545
6546
6547
6548
6549
6550
6551
6552
6553
6554
6555
6556
6557
6558
6559
6560
6561
6562
6563
6564
6565
6566
6567
6568
6569
6570
6571
6572
6573
6574
6575
6576
6577
6578
6579
6580
6581
6582
6583
6584
6585
6586
6587
6588
6589
6590
6591
6592
6593
6594
6595
6596
6597
6598
6599
6600
6601
6602
6603
6604
6605
6606
6607
6608
6609
6610
6611
6612
6613
6614
6615
6616
6617
6618
6619
6620
6621
6622
6623
6624
6625
6626
6627
6628
6629
6630
6631
6632
6633
6634
6635
6636
6637
6638
6639
6640
6641
6642
6643
6644
6645
6646
6647
6648
6649
6650
6651
6652
6653
6654
6655
6656
6657
6658
6659
6660
6661
6662
6663
6664
6665
6666
6667
6668
6669
6670
6671
6672
6673
6674
6675
6676
6677
6678
6679
6680
6681
6682
6683
6684
6685
6686
6687
6688
6689
6690
6691
6692
6693
6694
6695
6696
6697
6698
6699
6700
6701
6702
6703
6704
6705
6706
6707
6708
6709
6710
6711
6712
6713
6714
6715
6716
6717
6718
6719
6720
6721
6722
6723
6724
6725
6726
6727
6728
6729
6730
6731
6732
6733
6734
6735
6736
6737
6738
6739
6740
6741
6742
6743
6744
6745
6746
6747
6748
6749
6750
6751
6752
6753
6754
6755
6756
6757
6758
6759
6760
6761
6762
6763
6764
6765
6766
6767
6768
6769
6770
6771
6772
6773
6774
6775
6776
6777
6778
6779
6780
6781
6782
6783
6784
6785
6786
6787
6788
6789
6790
6791
6792
6793
6794
6795
6796
6797
6798
6799
6800
6801
6802
6803
6804
6805
6806
6807
6808
6809
6810
6811
6812
6813
6814
6815
6816
6817
6818
6819
6820
6821
6822
6823
6824
6825
6826
6827
6828
6829
6830
6831
6832
6833
6834
6835
6836
6837
6838
6839
6840
6841
6842
6843
6844
6845
6846
6847
6848
6849
6850
6851
6852
6853
6854
6855
6856
6857
6858
6859
6860
6861
6862
6863
6864
6865
6866
6867
6868
6869
6870
6871
6872
6873
6874
6875
6876
6877
6878
6879
6880
6881
6882
6883
6884
6885
6886
6887
6888
6889
6890
6891
6892
6893
6894
6895
6896
6897
6898
6899
6900
6901
6902
6903
6904
6905
6906
6907
6908
6909
6910
6911
6912
6913
6914
6915
6916
6917
6918
6919
6920
6921
6922
6923
6924
6925
6926
6927
6928
6929
6930
6931
6932
6933
6934
6935
6936
6937
6938
6939
6940
6941
6942
6943
6944
6945
6946
6947
6948
6949
6950
6951
6952
6953
6954
6955
6956
6957
6958
6959
6960
6961
6962
6963
6964
6965
6966
6967
6968
6969
6970
6971
6972
6973
6974
6975
6976
6977
6978
6979
6980
6981
6982
6983
6984
6985
6986
6987
6988
6989
6990
6991
6992
6993
6994
6995
6996
6997
6998
6999
7000
7001
7002
7003
7004
7005
7006
7007
7008
7009
7010
7011
7012
7013
7014
7015
7016
7017
7018
7019
7020
7021
7022
7023
7024
7025
7026
7027
7028
7029
7030
7031
7032
7033
7034
7035
7036
7037
7038
7039
7040
7041
7042
7043
7044
7045
7046
7047
7048
7049
7050
7051
7052
7053
7054
7055
7056
7057
7058
7059
7060
7061
7062
7063
7064
7065
7066
7067
7068
7069
7070
7071
7072
7073
7074
7075
7076
7077
7078
7079
7080
7081
7082
7083
7084
7085
7086
7087
7088
7089
7090
7091
7092
7093
7094
7095
7096
7097
7098
7099
7100
7101
7102
7103
7104
7105
7106
7107
7108
7109
7110
7111
7112
7113
7114
7115
7116
7117
7118
7119
7120
7121
7122
7123
7124
7125
7126
7127
7128
7129
7130
7131
7132
7133
7134
7135
7136
7137
7138
7139
7140
7141
7142
7143
7144
7145
7146
7147
7148
7149
7150
7151
7152
7153
7154
7155
7156
7157
7158
7159
7160
7161
7162
7163
7164
7165
7166
7167
7168
7169
7170
7171
7172
7173
7174
7175
7176
7177
7178
7179
7180
7181
7182
7183
7184
7185
7186
7187
7188
7189
7190
7191
7192
7193
7194
7195
7196
7197
7198
7199
7200
7201
7202
7203
7204
7205
7206
7207
7208
7209
7210
7211
7212
7213
7214
7215
7216
7217
7218
7219
7220
7221
7222
7223
7224
7225
7226
7227
7228
7229
7230
7231
7232
7233
7234
7235
7236
7237
7238
7239
7240
7241
7242
7243
7244
7245
7246
7247
7248
7249
7250
7251
7252
7253
7254
7255
7256
7257
7258
7259
7260
7261
7262
7263
7264
7265
7266
7267
7268
7269
7270
7271
7272
7273
7274
7275
7276
7277
7278
7279
7280
7281
7282
7283
7284
7285
7286
7287
7288
7289
7290
7291
7292
7293
7294
7295
7296
7297
7298
7299
7300
7301
7302
7303
7304
7305
7306
7307
7308
7309
7310
7311
7312
7313
7314
7315
7316
7317
7318
7319
7320
7321
7322
7323
7324
7325
7326
7327
7328
7329
7330
7331
7332
7333
7334
7335
7336
7337
7338
7339
7340
7341
7342
7343
7344
7345
7346
7347
7348
7349
7350
7351
7352
7353
7354
7355
7356
7357
7358
7359
7360
7361
7362
7363
7364
7365
7366
7367
7368
7369
7370
7371
7372
7373
7374
7375
7376
7377
7378
7379
7380
7381
7382
7383
7384
7385
7386
7387
7388
7389
7390
7391
7392
7393
7394
7395
7396
7397
7398
7399
7400
7401
7402
7403
7404
7405
7406
7407
7408
7409
7410
7411
7412
7413
7414
7415
7416
7417
7418
7419
7420
7421
7422
7423
7424
7425
7426
7427
7428
7429
7430
7431
7432
7433
7434
7435
7436
7437
7438
7439
7440
7441
7442
7443
7444
7445
7446
7447
7448
7449
7450
7451
7452
7453
7454
7455
7456
7457
7458
7459
7460
7461
7462
7463
7464
7465
7466
7467
7468
7469
7470
7471
7472
7473
7474
7475
7476
7477
7478
7479
7480
7481
7482
7483
7484
7485
7486
7487
7488
7489
7490
7491
7492
7493
7494
7495
7496
7497
7498
7499
7500
7501
7502
7503
7504
7505
7506
7507
7508
7509
7510
7511
7512
7513
7514
7515
7516
7517
7518
7519
7520
7521
7522
7523
7524
7525
7526
7527
7528
7529
7530
7531
7532
7533
7534
7535
7536
7537
7538
7539
7540
7541
7542
7543
7544
7545
7546
7547
7548
7549
7550
7551
7552
7553
7554
7555
7556
7557
7558
7559
7560
7561
7562
7563
7564
7565
7566
7567
7568
7569
7570
7571
7572
7573
7574
7575
7576
7577
7578
7579
7580
7581
7582
7583
7584
7585
7586
7587
7588
7589
7590
7591
7592
7593
7594
7595
7596
7597
7598
7599
7600
7601
7602
7603
7604
7605
7606
7607
7608
7609
7610
7611
7612
7613
7614
7615
7616
7617
7618
7619
7620
7621
7622
7623
7624
7625
7626
7627
7628
7629
7630
7631
7632
7633
7634
7635
7636
7637
7638
7639
7640
7641
7642
7643
7644
7645
7646
7647
7648
7649
7650
7651
7652
7653
7654
7655
7656
7657
7658
7659
7660
7661
7662
7663
7664
7665
7666
7667
7668
7669
7670
7671
7672
7673
7674
7675
7676
7677
7678
7679
7680
7681
7682
7683
7684
7685
7686
7687
7688
7689
7690
7691
7692
7693
7694
7695
7696
7697
7698
7699
7700
7701
7702
7703
7704
7705
7706
7707
7708
7709
7710
7711
7712
7713
7714
7715
7716
7717
7718
7719
7720
7721
7722
7723
7724
7725
7726
7727
7728
7729
7730
7731
7732
7733
7734
7735
7736
7737
7738
7739
7740
7741
7742
7743
7744
7745
7746
7747
7748
7749
7750
7751
7752
7753
7754
7755
7756
7757
7758
7759
7760
7761
7762
7763
7764
7765
7766
7767
7768
7769
7770
7771
7772
7773
7774
7775
7776
7777
7778
7779
7780
7781
7782
7783
7784
7785
7786
7787
7788
7789
7790
7791
7792
7793
7794
7795
7796
7797
7798
7799
7800
7801
7802
7803
7804
7805
7806
7807
7808
7809
7810
7811
7812
7813
7814
7815
7816
7817
7818
7819
7820
7821
7822
7823
7824
7825
7826
7827
7828
7829
7830
7831
7832
7833
7834
7835
7836
7837
7838
7839
7840
7841
7842
7843
7844
7845
7846
7847
7848
7849
7850
7851
7852
7853
7854
7855
7856
7857
7858
7859
7860
7861
7862
7863
7864
7865
7866
7867
7868
7869
7870
7871
7872
7873
7874
7875
7876
7877
7878
7879
7880
7881
7882
7883
7884
7885
7886
7887
7888
7889
7890
7891
7892
7893
7894
7895
7896
7897
7898
7899
7900
7901
7902
7903
7904
7905
7906
7907
7908
7909
7910
7911
7912
7913
7914
7915
7916
7917
7918
7919
7920
7921
7922
7923
7924
7925
7926
7927
7928
7929
7930
7931
7932
7933
7934
7935
7936
7937
7938
7939
7940
7941
7942
7943
7944
7945
7946
7947
7948
7949
7950
7951
7952
7953
7954
7955
7956
7957
7958
7959
7960
7961
7962
7963
7964
7965
7966
7967
7968
7969
7970
7971
7972
7973
7974
7975
7976
7977
7978
7979
7980
7981
7982
7983
7984
7985
7986
7987
7988
7989
7990
7991
7992
7993
7994
7995
7996
7997
7998
7999
8000
8001
8002
8003
8004
8005
8006
8007
8008
8009
8010
8011
8012
8013
8014
8015
8016
8017
8018
8019
8020
8021
8022
8023
8024
8025
8026
8027
8028
8029
8030
8031
8032
8033
8034
8035
8036
8037
8038
8039
8040
8041
8042
8043
8044
8045
8046
8047
8048
8049
8050
8051
8052
8053
8054
8055
8056
8057
8058
8059
8060
8061
8062
8063
8064
8065
8066
8067
8068
8069
8070
8071
8072
8073
8074
8075
8076
8077
8078
8079
8080
8081
8082
8083
8084
8085
8086
8087
8088
8089
8090
8091
8092
8093
8094
8095
8096
8097
8098
8099
8100
8101
8102
8103
8104
8105
8106
8107
8108
8109
8110
8111
8112
8113
8114
8115
8116
8117
8118
8119
8120
8121
8122
8123
8124
8125
8126
8127
8128
8129
8130
8131
8132
8133
8134
8135
8136
8137
8138
8139
8140
8141
8142
8143
8144
8145
8146
8147
8148
8149
8150
8151
8152
8153
8154
8155
8156
8157
8158
8159
8160
8161
8162
8163
8164
8165
8166
8167
8168
8169
8170
8171
8172
8173
8174
8175
8176
8177
8178
8179
8180
8181
8182
8183
8184
8185
8186
8187
8188
8189
8190
8191
8192
8193
8194
8195
8196
8197
8198
8199
8200
8201
8202
8203
8204
8205
8206
8207
8208
8209
8210
8211
8212
8213
8214
8215
8216
8217
8218
8219
8220
8221
8222
8223
8224
8225
8226
8227
8228
8229
8230
8231
8232
8233
8234
8235
8236
8237
8238
8239
8240
8241
8242
8243
8244
8245
8246
8247
8248
8249
8250
8251
8252
8253
8254
8255
8256
8257
8258
8259
8260
8261
8262
8263
8264
8265
8266
8267
8268
8269
8270
8271
8272
8273
8274
8275
8276
8277
8278
8279
8280
8281
8282
8283
8284
8285
8286
8287
8288
8289
8290
8291
8292
8293
8294
8295
8296
8297
8298
8299
8300
8301
8302
8303
8304
8305
8306
8307
8308
8309
8310
8311
8312
8313
8314
8315
8316
8317
8318
8319
8320
8321
8322
8323
8324
8325
8326
8327
8328
8329
8330
8331
8332
8333
8334
8335
8336
8337
8338
8339
8340
8341
8342
8343
8344
8345
8346
8347
8348
8349
8350
8351
8352
8353
8354
8355
8356
8357
8358
8359
8360
8361
8362
8363
8364
8365
8366
8367
8368
8369
8370
8371
8372
8373
8374
8375
8376
8377
8378
8379
8380
8381
8382
8383
8384
8385
8386
8387
8388
8389
8390
8391
8392
8393
8394
8395
8396
8397
8398
8399
8400
8401
8402
8403
8404
8405
8406
8407
8408
8409
8410
8411
8412
8413
8414
8415
8416
8417
8418
8419
8420
8421
8422
8423
8424
8425
8426
8427
8428
8429
8430
8431
8432
8433
8434
8435
8436
8437
8438
8439
8440
8441
8442
8443
8444
8445
8446
8447
8448
8449
8450
8451
8452
8453
8454
8455
8456
8457
8458
8459
8460
8461
8462
8463
8464
8465
8466
8467
8468
8469
8470
8471
8472
8473
8474
8475
8476
8477
8478
8479
8480
8481
8482
8483
8484
8485
8486
8487
8488
8489
8490
8491
8492
8493
8494
8495
8496
8497
8498
8499
8500
8501
8502
8503
8504
8505
8506
8507
8508
8509
8510
8511
8512
8513
8514
8515
8516
8517
8518
8519
8520
8521
8522
8523
8524
8525
8526
8527
8528
8529
8530
8531
8532
8533
8534
8535
8536
8537
8538
8539
8540
8541
8542
8543
8544
8545
8546
8547
8548
8549
8550
8551
8552
8553
8554
8555
8556
8557
8558
8559
8560
8561
8562
8563
8564
8565
8566
8567
8568
8569
8570
8571
8572
8573
8574
8575
8576
8577
8578
8579
8580
8581
8582
8583
8584
8585
8586
8587
8588
8589
8590
8591
8592
8593
8594
8595
8596
8597
8598
8599
8600
8601
8602
8603
8604
8605
8606
8607
8608
8609
8610
8611
8612
8613
8614
8615
8616
8617
8618
8619
8620
8621
8622
8623
8624
8625
8626
8627
8628
8629
8630
8631
8632
8633
8634
8635
8636
8637
8638
8639
8640
8641
8642
8643
8644
8645
8646
8647
8648
8649
8650
8651
8652
8653
8654
8655
8656
8657
8658
8659
8660
8661
8662
8663
8664
8665
8666
8667
8668
8669
8670
8671
8672
8673
8674
8675
8676
8677
8678
8679
8680
8681
8682
8683
8684
8685
8686
8687
8688
8689
8690
8691
8692
8693
8694
8695
8696
8697
8698
8699
8700
8701
8702
8703
8704
8705
8706
8707
8708
8709
8710
8711
8712
8713
8714
8715
8716
8717
8718
8719
8720
8721
8722
8723
8724
8725
8726
8727
8728
8729
8730
8731
8732
8733
8734
8735
8736
8737
8738
8739
8740
8741
8742
8743
8744
8745
8746
8747
8748
8749
8750
8751
8752
8753
8754
8755
8756
8757
8758
8759
8760
8761
8762
8763
8764
8765
8766
8767
8768
8769
8770
8771
8772
8773
8774
8775
8776
8777
8778
8779
8780
8781
8782
8783
8784
8785
8786
8787
8788
8789
8790
8791
8792
8793
8794
8795
8796
8797
8798
8799
8800
8801
8802
8803
8804
8805
8806
8807
8808
8809
8810
8811
8812
8813
8814
8815
8816
8817
8818
8819
8820
8821
8822
8823
8824
8825
8826
8827
8828
8829
8830
8831
8832
8833
8834
8835
8836
8837
8838
8839
8840
8841
8842
8843
8844
8845
8846
8847
8848
8849
8850
8851
8852
8853
8854
8855
8856
8857
8858
8859
8860
8861
8862
8863
8864
8865
8866
8867
8868
8869
8870
8871
8872
8873
8874
8875
8876
8877
8878
8879
8880
8881
8882
8883
8884
8885
8886
8887
8888
8889
8890
8891
8892
8893
8894
8895
8896
8897
8898
8899
8900
8901
8902
8903
8904
8905
8906
8907
8908
8909
8910
8911
8912
8913
8914
8915
8916
8917
8918
8919
8920
8921
8922
8923
8924
8925
8926
8927
8928
8929
8930
8931
8932
8933
8934
8935
8936
8937
8938
8939
8940
8941
8942
8943
8944
8945
8946
8947
8948
8949
8950
8951
8952
8953
8954
8955
8956
8957
8958
8959
8960
8961
8962
8963
8964
8965
8966
8967
8968
8969
8970
8971
8972
8973
8974
8975
8976
8977
8978
8979
8980
8981
8982
8983
8984
8985
8986
8987
8988
8989
8990
8991
8992
8993
8994
8995
8996
8997
8998
8999
9000
9001
9002
9003
9004
9005
9006
9007
9008
9009
9010
9011
9012
9013
9014
9015
9016
9017
9018
9019
9020
9021
9022
9023
9024
9025
9026
9027
9028
9029
9030
9031
9032
9033
9034
9035
9036
9037
9038
9039
9040
9041
9042
9043
9044
9045
9046
9047
9048
9049
9050
9051
9052
9053
9054
9055
9056
9057
9058
9059
9060
9061
9062
9063
9064
9065
9066
9067
9068
9069
9070
9071
9072
9073
9074
9075
9076
9077
9078
9079
9080
9081
9082
9083
9084
9085
9086
9087
9088
9089
9090
9091
9092
9093
9094
9095
9096
9097
9098
9099
9100
9101
9102
9103
9104
9105
9106
9107
9108
9109
9110
9111
9112
9113
9114
9115
9116
9117
9118
9119
9120
9121
9122
9123
9124
9125
9126
9127
9128
9129
9130
9131
9132
9133
9134
9135
9136
9137
9138
9139
9140
9141
9142
9143
9144
9145
9146
9147
9148
9149
9150
9151
9152
9153
9154
9155
9156
9157
9158
9159
9160
9161
9162
9163
9164
9165
9166
9167
9168
9169
9170
9171
9172
9173
9174
9175
9176
9177
9178
9179
9180
9181
9182
9183
9184
9185
9186
9187
9188
9189
9190
9191
9192
9193
9194
9195
9196
9197
9198
9199
9200
9201
9202
9203
9204
9205
9206
9207
9208
9209
9210
9211
9212
9213
9214
9215
9216
9217
9218
9219
9220
9221
9222
9223
9224
9225
9226
9227
9228
9229
9230
9231
9232
9233
9234
9235
9236
9237
9238
9239
9240
9241
9242
9243
9244
9245
9246
9247
9248
9249
9250
9251
9252
9253
9254
9255
9256
9257
9258
9259
9260
9261
9262
9263
9264
9265
9266
9267
9268
9269
9270
9271
9272
9273
9274
9275
9276
9277
9278
9279
9280
9281
9282
9283
9284
9285
9286
9287
9288
9289
9290
9291
9292
9293
9294
9295
9296
9297
9298
9299
9300
9301
9302
9303
9304
9305
9306
9307
9308
9309
9310
9311
9312
9313
9314
9315
9316
9317
9318
9319
9320
9321
9322
9323
9324
9325
9326
9327
9328
9329
9330
9331
9332
9333
9334
9335
9336
9337
9338
9339
9340
9341
9342
9343
9344
9345
9346
9347
9348
9349
9350
9351
9352
9353
9354
9355
9356
9357
9358
9359
9360
9361
9362
9363
9364
9365
9366
9367
9368
9369
9370
9371
9372
9373
9374
9375
9376
9377
9378
9379
9380
9381
9382
9383
9384
9385
9386
9387
9388
9389
9390
9391
9392
9393
9394
9395
9396
9397
9398
9399
9400
9401
9402
9403
9404
9405
9406
9407
9408
9409
9410
9411
9412
9413
9414
9415
9416
9417
9418
9419
9420
9421
9422
9423
9424
9425
9426
9427
9428
9429
9430
9431
9432
9433
9434
9435
9436
9437
9438
9439
9440
9441
9442
9443
9444
9445
9446
9447
9448
9449
9450
9451
9452
9453
9454
9455
9456
9457
9458
9459
9460
9461
9462
9463
9464
9465
9466
9467
9468
9469
9470
9471
9472
9473
9474
9475
9476
9477
9478
9479
9480
9481
9482
9483
9484
9485
9486
9487
9488
9489
9490
9491
9492
9493
9494
9495
9496
9497
9498
9499
9500
9501
9502
9503
9504
9505
9506
9507
9508
9509
9510
9511
9512
9513
9514
9515
9516
9517
9518
9519
9520
9521
9522
9523
9524
9525
9526
9527
9528
9529
9530
9531
9532
9533
9534
9535
9536
9537
9538
9539
9540
9541
9542
9543
9544
9545
9546
9547
9548
9549
9550
9551
9552
9553
9554
9555
9556
9557
9558
9559
9560
9561
9562
9563
9564
9565
9566
9567
9568
9569
9570
9571
9572
9573
9574
9575
9576
9577
9578
9579
9580
9581
9582
9583
9584
9585
9586
9587
9588
9589
9590
9591
9592
9593
9594
9595
9596
9597
9598
9599
9600
9601
9602
9603
9604
9605
9606
9607
9608
9609
9610
9611
9612
9613
9614
9615
9616
9617
9618
9619
9620
9621
9622
9623
9624
9625
9626
9627
9628
9629
9630
9631
9632
9633
9634
9635
9636
9637
9638
9639
9640
9641
9642
9643
9644
9645
9646
9647
9648
9649
9650
9651
9652
9653
9654
9655
9656
9657
9658
9659
9660
9661
9662
9663
9664
9665
9666
9667
9668
9669
9670
9671
9672
9673
9674
9675
9676
9677
9678
9679
9680
9681
9682
9683
9684
9685
9686
9687
9688
9689
9690
9691
9692
9693
9694
9695
9696
9697
9698
9699
9700
9701
9702
9703
9704
9705
9706
9707
9708
9709
9710
9711
9712
9713
9714
9715
9716
9717
9718
9719
9720
9721
9722
9723
9724
9725
9726
9727
9728
9729
9730
9731
9732
9733
9734
9735
9736
9737
9738
9739
9740
9741
9742
9743
9744
9745
9746
9747
9748
9749
9750
9751
9752
9753
9754
9755
9756
9757
9758
9759
9760
9761
9762
9763
9764
9765
9766
9767
9768
9769
9770
9771
9772
9773
9774
9775
9776
9777
9778
9779
9780
9781
9782
9783
9784
9785
9786
9787
9788
9789
9790
9791
9792
9793
9794
9795
9796
9797
9798
9799
9800
9801
9802
9803
9804
9805
9806
9807
9808
9809
9810
9811
9812
9813
9814
9815
9816
9817
9818
9819
9820
9821
9822
9823
9824
9825
9826
9827
9828
9829
9830
9831
9832
9833
9834
9835
9836
9837
9838
9839
9840
9841
9842
9843
9844
9845
9846
9847
9848
9849
9850
9851
9852
9853
9854
9855
9856
9857
9858
9859
9860
9861
9862
9863
9864
9865
9866
9867
9868
9869
9870
9871
9872
9873
9874
9875
9876
9877
9878
9879
9880
9881
9882
9883
9884
9885
9886
9887
9888
9889
9890
9891
9892
9893
9894
9895
9896
9897
9898
9899
9900
9901
9902
9903
9904
9905
9906
9907
9908
9909
9910
9911
9912
9913
9914
9915
9916
9917
9918
9919
9920
9921
9922
9923
9924
9925
9926
9927
9928
9929
9930
9931
9932
9933
9934
9935
9936
9937
9938
9939
9940
9941
9942
9943
9944
9945
9946
9947
9948
9949
9950
9951
9952
9953
9954
9955
9956
9957
9958
9959
9960
9961
9962
9963
9964
9965
9966
9967
9968
9969
9970
9971
9972
9973
9974
9975
9976
9977
9978
9979
9980
9981
9982
9983
9984
9985
9986
9987
9988
9989
9990
9991
9992
9993
9994
9995
9996
9997
9998
9999
10000
10001
10002
10003
10004
10005
10006
10007
10008
10009
10010
10011
10012
10013
10014
10015
10016
10017
10018
10019
10020
10021
10022
10023
10024
10025
10026
10027
10028
10029
10030
10031
10032
10033
10034
10035
10036
10037
10038
10039
10040
10041
10042
10043
10044
10045
10046
10047
10048
10049
10050
10051
10052
10053
10054
10055
10056
10057
10058
10059
10060
10061
10062
10063
10064
10065
10066
10067
10068
10069
10070
10071
10072
10073
10074
10075
10076
10077
10078
10079
10080
10081
10082
10083
10084
10085
10086
10087
10088
10089
10090
10091
10092
10093
10094
10095
10096
10097
10098
10099
10100
10101
10102
10103
10104
10105
10106
10107
10108
10109
10110
10111
10112
10113
10114
10115
10116
10117
10118
10119
10120
10121
10122
10123
10124
10125
10126
10127
10128
10129
10130
10131
10132
10133
10134
10135
10136
10137
10138
10139
10140
10141
10142
10143
10144
10145
10146
10147
10148
10149
10150
10151
10152
10153
10154
10155
10156
10157
10158
10159
10160
10161
10162
10163
10164
10165
10166
10167
10168
10169
10170
10171
10172
10173
10174
10175
10176
10177
10178
10179
10180
10181
10182
10183
10184
10185
10186
10187
10188
10189
10190
10191
10192
10193
10194
10195
10196
10197
10198
10199
10200
10201
10202
10203
10204
10205
10206
10207
10208
10209
10210
10211
10212
10213
10214
10215
10216
10217
10218
10219
10220
10221
10222
10223
10224
10225
10226
10227
10228
10229
10230
10231
10232
10233
10234
10235
10236
10237
10238
10239
10240
10241
10242
10243
10244
10245
10246
10247
10248
10249
10250
10251
10252
10253
10254
10255
10256
10257
10258
10259
10260
10261
10262
10263
10264
10265
10266
10267
10268
10269
10270
10271
10272
10273
10274
10275
10276
10277
10278
10279
10280
10281
10282
10283
10284
10285
10286
10287
10288
10289
10290
10291
10292
10293
10294
10295
10296
10297
10298
10299
10300
10301
10302
10303
10304
10305
10306
10307
10308
10309
10310
10311
10312
10313
10314
10315
10316
10317
10318
10319
10320
10321
10322
10323
10324
10325
10326
10327
10328
10329
10330
10331
10332
10333
10334
10335
10336
10337
10338
10339
10340
10341
10342
10343
10344
10345
10346
10347
10348
10349
10350
10351
10352
10353
10354
10355
10356
10357
10358
10359
10360
10361
10362
10363
10364
10365
10366
10367
10368
10369
10370
10371
10372
10373
10374
10375
10376
10377
10378
10379
10380
10381
10382
10383
10384
10385
10386
10387
10388
10389
10390
10391
10392
10393
10394
10395
10396
10397
10398
10399
10400
10401
10402
10403
10404
10405
10406
10407
10408
10409
10410
10411
10412
10413
10414
10415
10416
10417
10418
10419
10420
10421
10422
10423
10424
10425
10426
10427
10428
10429
10430
10431
10432
10433
10434
10435
10436
10437
10438
10439
10440
10441
10442
10443
10444
10445
10446
10447
10448
10449
10450
10451
10452
10453
10454
10455
10456
10457
10458
10459
10460
10461
10462
10463
10464
10465
10466
10467
10468
10469
10470
10471
10472
10473
10474
10475
10476
10477
10478
10479
10480
10481
10482
10483
10484
10485
10486
10487
10488
10489
10490
10491
10492
10493
10494
10495
10496
10497
10498
10499
10500
10501
10502
10503
10504
10505
10506
10507
10508
10509
10510
10511
10512
10513
10514
10515
10516
10517
10518
10519
10520
10521
10522
10523
10524
10525
10526
10527
10528
10529
10530
10531
10532
10533
10534
10535
10536
10537
10538
10539
10540
10541
10542
10543
10544
10545
10546
10547
10548
10549
10550
10551
10552
10553
10554
10555
10556
10557
10558
10559
10560
10561
10562
10563
10564
10565
10566
10567
10568
10569
10570
10571
10572
10573
10574
10575
10576
10577
10578
10579
10580
10581
10582
10583
10584
10585
10586
10587
10588
10589
10590
10591
10592
10593
10594
10595
10596
10597
10598
10599
10600
10601
10602
10603
10604
10605
10606
10607
10608
10609
10610
10611
10612
10613
10614
10615
10616
10617
10618
10619
10620
10621
10622
10623
10624
10625
10626
10627
10628
10629
10630
10631
10632
10633
10634
10635
10636
10637
10638
10639
10640
10641
10642
10643
10644
10645
10646
10647
10648
10649
10650
10651
10652
10653
10654
10655
10656
10657
10658
10659
10660
10661
10662
10663
10664
10665
10666
10667
10668
10669
10670
10671
10672
10673
10674
10675
10676
10677
10678
10679
10680
10681
10682
10683
10684
10685
10686
10687
10688
10689
10690
10691
10692
10693
10694
10695
10696
10697
10698
10699
10700
10701
10702
10703
10704
10705
10706
10707
10708
10709
10710
10711
10712
10713
10714
10715
10716
10717
10718
10719
10720
10721
10722
10723
10724
10725
10726
10727
10728
10729
10730
10731
10732
10733
10734
10735
10736
10737
10738
10739
10740
10741
10742
10743
10744
10745
10746
10747
10748
10749
10750
10751
10752
10753
10754
10755
10756
10757
10758
10759
10760
10761
10762
10763
10764
10765
10766
10767
10768
10769
10770
10771
10772
10773
10774
10775
10776
10777
10778
10779
10780
10781
10782
10783
10784
10785
10786
10787
10788
10789
10790
10791
10792
10793
10794
10795
10796
10797
10798
10799
10800
10801
10802
10803
10804
10805
10806
10807
10808
10809
10810
10811
10812
10813
10814
10815
10816
10817
10818
10819
10820
10821
10822
10823
10824
10825
10826
10827
10828
10829
10830
10831
10832
10833
10834
10835
10836
10837
10838
10839
10840
10841
10842
10843
10844
10845
10846
10847
10848
10849
10850
10851
10852
10853
10854
10855
10856
10857
10858
10859
10860
10861
10862
10863
10864
10865
10866
10867
10868
10869
10870
10871
10872
10873
10874
10875
10876
10877
10878
10879
10880
10881
10882
10883
10884
10885
10886
10887
10888
10889
10890
10891
10892
10893
10894
10895
10896
10897
10898
10899
10900
10901
10902
10903
10904
10905
10906
10907
10908
10909
10910
10911
10912
10913
10914
10915
10916
10917
10918
10919
10920
10921
10922
10923
10924
10925
10926
10927
10928
10929
10930
10931
10932
10933
10934
10935
10936
10937
10938
10939
10940
10941
10942
10943
10944
10945
10946
10947
10948
10949
10950
10951
10952
10953
10954
10955
10956
10957
10958
10959
10960
10961
10962
10963
10964
10965
10966
10967
10968
10969
10970
10971
10972
10973
10974
10975
10976
10977
10978
10979
10980
10981
10982
10983
10984
10985
10986
10987
10988
10989
10990
10991
10992
10993
10994
10995
10996
10997
10998
10999
11000
11001
11002
11003
11004
11005
11006
11007
11008
11009
11010
11011
11012
11013
11014
11015
11016
11017
11018
11019
11020
11021
11022
11023
11024
11025
11026
11027
11028
11029
11030
11031
11032
11033
11034
11035
11036
11037
11038
11039
11040
11041
11042
11043
11044
11045
11046
11047
11048
11049
11050
11051
11052
11053
11054
11055
11056
11057
11058
11059
11060
11061
11062
11063
11064
11065
11066
11067
11068
11069
11070
11071
11072
11073
11074
11075
11076
11077
11078
11079
11080
11081
11082
11083
11084
11085
11086
11087
11088
11089
11090
11091
11092
11093
11094
11095
11096
11097
11098
11099
11100
11101
11102
11103
11104
11105
11106
11107
11108
11109
11110
11111
11112
11113
11114
11115
11116
11117
11118
11119
11120
11121
11122
11123
11124
11125
11126
11127
11128
11129
11130
11131
11132
11133
11134
11135
11136
11137
11138
11139
11140
11141
11142
11143
11144
11145
11146
11147
11148
11149
11150
11151
11152
11153
11154
11155
11156
11157
11158
11159
11160
11161
11162
11163
11164
11165
11166
11167
11168
11169
11170
11171
11172
11173
11174
11175
11176
11177
11178
11179
11180
11181
11182
11183
11184
11185
11186
11187
11188
11189
11190
11191
11192
11193
11194
11195
11196
11197
11198
11199
11200
11201
11202
11203
11204
11205
11206
11207
11208
11209
11210
11211
11212
11213
11214
11215
11216
11217
11218
11219
11220
11221
11222
11223
11224
11225
11226
11227
11228
11229
11230
11231
11232
11233
11234
11235
11236
11237
11238
11239
11240
11241
11242
11243
11244
11245
11246
11247
11248
11249
11250
11251
11252
11253
11254
11255
11256
11257
11258
11259
11260
11261
11262
11263
11264
11265
11266
11267
11268
11269
11270
11271
11272
11273
11274
11275
11276
11277
11278
11279
11280
11281
11282
11283
11284
11285
11286
11287
11288
11289
11290
11291
11292
11293
11294
11295
11296
11297
11298
11299
11300
11301
11302
11303
11304
11305
11306
11307
11308
11309
11310
11311
11312
11313
11314
11315
11316
11317
11318
11319
11320
11321
11322
11323
11324
11325
11326
11327
11328
11329
11330
11331
11332
11333
11334
11335
11336
11337
11338
11339
11340
11341
11342
11343
11344
11345
11346
11347
11348
11349
11350
11351
11352
11353
11354
11355
11356
11357
11358
11359
11360
11361
11362
11363
11364
11365
11366
11367
11368
11369
11370
11371
11372
11373
11374
11375
11376
11377
11378
11379
11380
11381
11382
11383
11384
11385
11386
11387
11388
11389
11390
11391
11392
11393
11394
11395
11396
11397
11398
11399
11400
11401
11402
11403
11404
11405
11406
11407
11408
11409
11410
11411
11412
11413
11414
11415
11416
11417
11418
11419
11420
11421
11422
11423
11424
11425
11426
11427
11428
11429
11430
11431
11432
11433
11434
11435
11436
11437
11438
11439
11440
11441
11442
11443
11444
11445
11446
11447
11448
11449
11450
11451
11452
11453
11454
11455
11456
11457
11458
11459
11460
11461
11462
11463
11464
11465
11466
11467
11468
11469
11470
11471
11472
11473
11474
11475
11476
11477
11478
11479
11480
11481
11482
11483
11484
11485
11486
11487
11488
11489
11490
11491
11492
11493
11494
11495
11496
11497
11498
11499
11500
11501
11502
11503
11504
11505
11506
11507
11508
11509
11510
11511
11512
11513
11514
11515
11516
11517
11518
11519
11520
11521
11522
11523
11524
11525
11526
11527
11528
11529
11530
11531
11532
11533
11534
11535
11536
11537
11538
11539
11540
11541
11542
11543
11544
11545
11546
11547
11548
11549
11550
11551
11552
11553
11554
11555
11556
11557
11558
11559
11560
11561
11562
11563
11564
11565
11566
11567
11568
11569
11570
11571
11572
11573
11574
11575
11576
11577
11578
11579
11580
11581
11582
11583
11584
11585
11586
11587
11588
11589
11590
11591
11592
11593
11594
11595
11596
11597
11598
11599
11600
11601
11602
11603
11604
11605
11606
11607
11608
11609
11610
11611
11612
11613
11614
11615
11616
11617
11618
11619
11620
11621
11622
11623
11624
11625
11626
11627
11628
11629
11630
11631
11632
11633
11634
11635
11636
11637
11638
11639
11640
11641
11642
11643
11644
11645
11646
11647
11648
11649
11650
11651
11652
11653
11654
11655
11656
11657
11658
11659
11660
11661
11662
11663
11664
11665
11666
11667
11668
11669
11670
11671
11672
11673
11674
11675
11676
11677
11678
11679
11680
11681
11682
11683
11684
11685
11686
11687
11688
11689
11690
11691
11692
11693
11694
11695
11696
11697
11698
11699
11700
11701
11702
11703
11704
11705
11706
11707
11708
11709
11710
11711
11712
11713
11714
11715
11716
11717
11718
11719
11720
11721
11722
11723
11724
11725
11726
11727
11728
11729
11730
11731
11732
11733
11734
11735
11736
11737
11738
11739
11740
11741
11742
11743
11744
11745
11746
11747
11748
11749
11750
11751
11752
11753
11754
11755
11756
11757
11758
11759
11760
11761
11762
11763
11764
11765
11766
11767
11768
11769
11770
11771
11772
11773
11774
11775
11776
11777
11778
11779
11780
11781
11782
11783
11784
11785
11786
11787
11788
11789
11790
11791
11792
11793
11794
11795
11796
11797
11798
11799
11800
11801
11802
11803
11804
11805
11806
11807
11808
11809
11810
11811
11812
11813
11814
11815
11816
11817
11818
11819
11820
11821
11822
11823
11824
11825
11826
11827
11828
11829
11830
11831
11832
11833
11834
11835
11836
11837
11838
11839
11840
11841
11842
11843
11844
11845
11846
11847
11848
11849
11850
11851
11852
11853
11854
11855
11856
11857
11858
11859
11860
11861
11862
11863
11864
11865
11866
11867
11868
11869
11870
11871
11872
11873
11874
11875
11876
11877
11878
11879
11880
11881
11882
11883
11884
11885
11886
11887
11888
11889
11890
11891
11892
11893
11894
11895
11896
11897
11898
11899
11900
11901
11902
11903
11904
11905
11906
11907
11908
11909
11910
11911
11912
11913
11914
11915
11916
11917
11918
11919
11920
11921
11922
11923
11924
11925
11926
11927
11928
11929
11930
11931
11932
11933
11934
11935
11936
11937
11938
11939
11940
11941
11942
11943
11944
11945
11946
11947
11948
11949
11950
11951
11952
11953
11954
11955
11956
11957
11958
11959
11960
11961
11962
11963
11964
11965
11966
11967
11968
11969
11970
11971
11972
11973
11974
11975
11976
11977
11978
11979
11980
11981
11982
11983
11984
11985
11986
11987
11988
11989
11990
11991
11992
11993
11994
11995
11996
11997
11998
11999
12000
12001
12002
12003
12004
12005
12006
12007
12008
12009
12010
12011
12012
12013
12014
12015
12016
12017
12018
12019
12020
12021
12022
12023
12024
12025
12026
12027
12028
12029
12030
12031
12032
12033
12034
12035
12036
12037
12038
12039
12040
12041
12042
12043
12044
12045
12046
12047
12048
12049
12050
12051
12052
12053
12054
12055
12056
12057
12058
12059
12060
12061
12062
12063
12064
12065
12066
12067
12068
12069
12070
12071
12072
12073
12074
12075
12076
12077
12078
12079
12080
12081
12082
12083
12084
12085
12086
12087
12088
12089
12090
12091
12092
12093
12094
12095
12096
12097
12098
12099
12100
12101
12102
12103
12104
12105
12106
12107
12108
12109
12110
12111
12112
12113
12114
12115
12116
12117
12118
12119
12120
12121
12122
12123
12124
12125
12126
12127
12128
12129
12130
12131
12132
12133
12134
12135
12136
12137
12138
12139
12140
12141
12142
12143
12144
12145
12146
12147
12148
12149
12150
12151
12152
12153
12154
12155
12156
12157
12158
12159
12160
12161
12162
12163
12164
12165
12166
12167
12168
12169
12170
12171
12172
12173
12174
12175
12176
12177
12178
12179
12180
12181
12182
12183
12184
12185
12186
12187
12188
12189
12190
12191
12192
12193
12194
12195
12196
12197
12198
12199
12200
12201
12202
12203
12204
12205
12206
12207
12208
12209
12210
12211
12212
12213
12214
12215
12216
12217
12218
12219
12220
12221
12222
12223
12224
12225
12226
12227
12228
12229
12230
12231
12232
12233
12234
12235
12236
12237
12238
12239
12240
12241
12242
12243
12244
12245
12246
12247
12248
12249
12250
12251
12252
12253
12254
12255
12256
12257
12258
12259
12260
12261
12262
12263
12264
12265
12266
12267
12268
12269
12270
12271
12272
12273
12274
12275
12276
12277
12278
12279
12280
12281
12282
12283
12284
12285
12286
12287
12288
12289
12290
12291
12292
12293
12294
12295
12296
12297
12298
12299
12300
12301
12302
12303
12304
12305
12306
12307
12308
12309
12310
12311
12312
12313
12314
12315
12316
12317
12318
12319
12320
12321
12322
12323
12324
12325
12326
12327
12328
12329
12330
12331
12332
12333
12334
12335
12336
12337
12338
12339
12340
12341
12342
12343
12344
12345
12346
12347
12348
12349
12350
12351
12352
12353
12354
12355
12356
12357
12358
12359
12360
12361
12362
12363
12364
12365
12366
12367
12368
12369
12370
12371
12372
12373
12374
12375
12376
12377
12378
12379
12380
12381
12382
12383
12384
12385
12386
12387
12388
12389
12390
12391
12392
12393
12394
12395
12396
12397
12398
12399
12400
12401
12402
12403
12404
12405
12406
12407
12408
12409
12410
12411
12412
12413
12414
12415
12416
12417
12418
12419
12420
12421
12422
12423
12424
12425
12426
12427
12428
12429
12430
12431
12432
12433
12434
12435
12436
12437
12438
12439
12440
12441
12442
12443
12444
12445
12446
12447
12448
12449
12450
12451
12452
12453
12454
12455
12456
12457
12458
12459
12460
12461
12462
12463
12464
12465
12466
12467
12468
12469
12470
12471
12472
12473
12474
12475
12476
12477
12478
12479
12480
12481
12482
12483
12484
12485
12486
12487
12488
12489
12490
12491
12492
12493
12494
12495
12496
12497
12498
12499
12500
12501
12502
12503
12504
12505
12506
12507
12508
12509
12510
12511
12512
12513
12514
12515
12516
12517
12518
12519
12520
12521
12522
12523
12524
12525
12526
12527
12528
12529
12530
12531
12532
12533
12534
12535
12536
12537
12538
12539
12540
12541
12542
12543
12544
12545
12546
12547
12548
12549
12550
12551
12552
12553
12554
12555
12556
12557
12558
12559
12560
12561
12562
12563
12564
12565
12566
12567
12568
12569
12570
12571
12572
12573
12574
12575
12576
12577
12578
12579
12580
12581
12582
12583
12584
12585
12586
12587
12588
12589
12590
12591
12592
12593
12594
12595
12596
12597
12598
12599
12600
12601
12602
12603
12604
12605
12606
12607
12608
12609
12610
12611
12612
12613
12614
12615
12616
12617
12618
12619
12620
12621
12622
12623
12624
12625
12626
12627
12628
12629
12630
12631
12632
12633
12634
12635
12636
12637
12638
12639
12640
12641
12642
12643
12644
12645
12646
12647
12648
12649
12650
12651
12652
12653
12654
12655
12656
12657
12658
12659
12660
12661
12662
12663
12664
12665
12666
12667
12668
12669
12670
12671
12672
12673
12674
12675
12676
12677
12678
12679
12680
12681
12682
12683
12684
12685
12686
12687
12688
12689
12690
12691
12692
12693
12694
12695
12696
12697
12698
12699
12700
12701
12702
12703
12704
12705
12706
12707
12708
12709
12710
12711
12712
12713
12714
12715
12716
12717
12718
12719
12720
12721
12722
12723
12724
12725
12726
12727
12728
12729
12730
12731
12732
12733
12734
12735
12736
12737
12738
12739
12740
12741
12742
12743
12744
12745
12746
12747
12748
12749
12750
12751
12752
12753
12754
12755
12756
12757
12758
12759
12760
12761
12762
12763
12764
12765
12766
12767
12768
12769
12770
12771
12772
12773
12774
12775
12776
12777
12778
12779
12780
12781
12782
12783
12784
12785
12786
12787
12788
12789
12790
12791
12792
12793
12794
12795
12796
12797
12798
12799
12800
12801
12802
12803
12804
12805
12806
12807
12808
12809
12810
12811
12812
12813
12814
12815
12816
12817
12818
12819
12820
12821
12822
12823
12824
12825
12826
12827
12828
12829
12830
12831
12832
12833
12834
12835
12836
12837
12838
12839
12840
12841
12842
12843
12844
12845
12846
12847
12848
12849
12850
12851
12852
12853
12854
12855
12856
12857
12858
12859
12860
12861
12862
12863
12864
12865
12866
12867
12868
12869
12870
12871
12872
12873
12874
12875
12876
12877
12878
12879
12880
12881
12882
12883
12884
12885
12886
12887
12888
12889
12890
12891
12892
12893
12894
12895
12896
12897
12898
12899
12900
12901
12902
12903
12904
12905
12906
12907
12908
12909
12910
12911
12912
12913
12914
12915
12916
12917
12918
12919
12920
12921
12922
12923
12924
12925
12926
12927
12928
12929
12930
12931
12932
12933
12934
12935
12936
12937
12938
12939
12940
12941
12942
12943
12944
12945
12946
12947
12948
12949
12950
12951
12952
12953
12954
12955
12956
12957
12958
12959
12960
12961
12962
12963
12964
12965
12966
12967
12968
12969
12970
12971
12972
12973
12974
12975
12976
12977
12978
12979
12980
12981
12982
12983
12984
12985
12986
12987
12988
12989
12990
12991
12992
12993
12994
12995
12996
12997
12998
12999
13000
13001
13002
13003
13004
13005
13006
13007
13008
13009
13010
13011
13012
13013
13014
13015
13016
13017
13018
13019
13020
13021
13022
13023
13024
13025
13026
13027
13028
13029
13030
13031
13032
13033
13034
13035
13036
13037
13038
13039
13040
13041
13042
13043
13044
13045
13046
13047
13048
13049
13050
13051
13052
13053
13054
13055
13056
13057
13058
13059
13060
13061
13062
13063
13064
13065
13066
13067
13068
13069
13070
13071
13072
13073
13074
13075
13076
13077
13078
13079
13080
13081
13082
13083
13084
13085
13086
13087
13088
13089
13090
13091
13092
13093
13094
13095
13096
13097
13098
13099
13100
13101
13102
13103
13104
13105
13106
13107
13108
13109
13110
13111
13112
13113
13114
13115
13116
13117
13118
13119
13120
13121
13122
13123
13124
13125
13126
13127
13128
13129
13130
13131
13132
13133
13134
13135
13136
13137
13138
13139
13140
13141
13142
13143
13144
13145
13146
13147
13148
13149
13150
13151
13152
13153
13154
13155
13156
13157
13158
13159
13160
13161
13162
13163
13164
13165
13166
13167
13168
13169
13170
13171
13172
13173
13174
13175
13176
13177
13178
13179
13180
13181
13182
13183
13184
13185
13186
13187
13188
13189
13190
13191
13192
13193
13194
13195
13196
13197
13198
13199
13200
13201
13202
13203
13204
13205
13206
13207
13208
13209
13210
13211
13212
13213
13214
13215
13216
13217
13218
13219
13220
13221
13222
13223
13224
13225
13226
13227
13228
13229
13230
13231
13232
13233
13234
13235
13236
13237
13238
13239
13240
13241
13242
13243
13244
13245
13246
13247
13248
13249
13250
13251
13252
13253
13254
13255
13256
13257
13258
13259
13260
13261
13262
13263
13264
13265
13266
13267
13268
13269
13270
13271
13272
13273
13274
13275
13276
13277
13278
13279
13280
13281
13282
13283
13284
13285
13286
13287
13288
13289
13290
13291
13292
13293
13294
13295
13296
13297
13298
13299
13300
13301
13302
13303
13304
13305
13306
13307
13308
13309
13310
13311
13312
13313
13314
13315
13316
13317
13318
13319
13320
13321
13322
13323
13324
13325
13326
13327
13328
13329
13330
13331
13332
13333
13334
13335
13336
13337
13338
13339
13340
13341
13342
13343
13344
13345
13346
13347
13348
13349
13350
13351
13352
13353
13354
13355
13356
13357
13358
13359
13360
13361
13362
13363
13364
13365
13366
13367
13368
13369
13370
13371
13372
13373
13374
13375
13376
13377
13378
13379
13380
13381
13382
13383
13384
13385
13386
13387
13388
13389
13390
13391
13392
13393
13394
13395
13396
13397
13398
13399
13400
13401
13402
13403
13404
13405
13406
13407
13408
13409
13410
13411
13412
13413
13414
13415
13416
13417
13418
13419
13420
13421
13422
13423
13424
13425
13426
13427
13428
13429
13430
13431
13432
13433
13434
13435
13436
13437
13438
13439
13440
13441
13442
13443
13444
13445
13446
13447
13448
13449
13450
13451
13452
13453
13454
13455
13456
13457
13458
13459
13460
13461
13462
13463
13464
13465
13466
13467
13468
13469
13470
13471
13472
13473
13474
13475
13476
13477
13478
13479
13480
13481
13482
13483
13484
13485
13486
13487
13488
13489
13490
13491
13492
13493
13494
13495
13496
13497
13498
13499
13500
13501
13502
13503
13504
13505
13506
13507
13508
13509
13510
13511
13512
13513
13514
13515
13516
13517
13518
13519
13520
13521
13522
13523
13524
13525
13526
13527
13528
13529
13530
13531
13532
13533
13534
13535
13536
13537
13538
13539
13540
13541
13542
13543
13544
13545
13546
13547
13548
13549
13550
13551
13552
13553
13554
13555
13556
13557
13558
13559
13560
13561
13562
13563
13564
13565
13566
13567
13568
13569
13570
13571
13572
13573
13574
13575
13576
13577
13578
13579
13580
13581
13582
13583
13584
13585
13586
13587
13588
13589
13590
13591
13592
13593
13594
13595
13596
13597
13598
13599
13600
13601
13602
13603
13604
13605
13606
13607
13608
13609
13610
13611
13612
13613
13614
13615
13616
13617
13618
13619
13620
13621
13622
13623
13624
13625
13626
13627
13628
13629
13630
13631
13632
13633
13634
13635
13636
13637
13638
13639
13640
13641
13642
13643
13644
13645
13646
13647
13648
13649
13650
13651
13652
13653
13654
13655
13656
13657
13658
13659
13660
13661
13662
13663
13664
13665
13666
13667
13668
13669
13670
13671
13672
13673
13674
13675
13676
13677
13678
13679
13680
13681
13682
13683
13684
13685
13686
13687
13688
13689
13690
13691
13692
13693
13694
13695
13696
13697
13698
13699
13700
13701
13702
13703
13704
13705
13706
13707
13708
13709
13710
13711
13712
13713
13714
13715
13716
13717
13718
13719
13720
13721
13722
13723
13724
13725
13726
13727
13728
13729
13730
13731
13732
13733
13734
13735
13736
13737
13738
13739
13740
13741
13742
13743
13744
13745
13746
13747
13748
13749
13750
13751
13752
13753
13754
13755
13756
13757
13758
13759
13760
13761
13762
13763
13764
13765
13766
13767
13768
13769
13770
13771
13772
13773
13774
13775
13776
13777
13778
13779
13780
13781
13782
13783
13784
13785
13786
13787
13788
13789
13790
13791
13792
13793
13794
13795
13796
13797
13798
13799
13800
13801
13802
13803
13804
13805
13806
13807
13808
13809
13810
13811
13812
13813
13814
13815
13816
13817
13818
13819
13820
13821
13822
13823
13824
13825
13826
13827
13828
13829
13830
13831
13832
13833
13834
13835
13836
13837
13838
13839
13840
13841
13842
13843
13844
13845
13846
13847
13848
13849
13850
13851
13852
13853
13854
13855
13856
13857
13858
13859
13860
13861
13862
13863
13864
13865
13866
13867
13868
13869
13870
13871
13872
13873
13874
13875
13876
13877
13878
13879
13880
13881
13882
13883
13884
13885
13886
13887
13888
13889
13890
13891
13892
13893
13894
13895
13896
13897
13898
13899
13900
13901
13902
13903
13904
13905
13906
13907
13908
13909
13910
13911
13912
13913
13914
13915
13916
13917
13918
13919
13920
13921
13922
13923
13924
13925
13926
13927
13928
13929
13930
13931
13932
13933
13934
13935
13936
13937
13938
13939
13940
13941
13942
13943
13944
13945
13946
13947
13948
13949
13950
13951
13952
13953
13954
13955
13956
13957
13958
13959
13960
13961
13962
13963
13964
13965
13966
13967
13968
13969
13970
13971
13972
13973
13974
13975
13976
13977
13978
13979
13980
13981
13982
13983
13984
13985
13986
13987
13988
13989
13990
13991
13992
13993
13994
13995
13996
13997
13998
13999
14000
14001
14002
14003
14004
14005
14006
14007
14008
14009
14010
14011
14012
14013
14014
14015
14016
14017
14018
14019
14020
14021
14022
14023
14024
14025
14026
14027
14028
14029
14030
14031
14032
14033
14034
14035
14036
14037
14038
14039
14040
14041
14042
14043
14044
14045
14046
14047
14048
14049
14050
14051
14052
14053
14054
14055
14056
14057
14058
14059
14060
14061
14062
14063
14064
14065
14066
14067
14068
14069
14070
14071
14072
14073
14074
14075
14076
14077
14078
14079
14080
14081
14082
14083
14084
14085
14086
14087
14088
14089
14090
14091
14092
14093
14094
14095
14096
14097
14098
14099
14100
14101
14102
14103
14104
14105
14106
14107
14108
14109
14110
14111
14112
14113
14114
14115
14116
14117
14118
14119
14120
14121
14122
14123
14124
14125
14126
14127
14128
14129
14130
14131
14132
14133
14134
14135
14136
14137
14138
14139
14140
14141
14142
14143
14144
14145
14146
14147
14148
14149
14150
14151
14152
14153
14154
14155
14156
14157
14158
14159
14160
14161
14162
14163
14164
14165
14166
14167
14168
14169
14170
14171
14172
14173
14174
14175
14176
14177
14178
14179
14180
14181
14182
14183
14184
14185
14186
14187
14188
14189
14190
14191
14192
14193
14194
14195
14196
14197
14198
14199
14200
14201
14202
14203
14204
14205
14206
14207
14208
14209
14210
14211
14212
14213
14214
14215
14216
14217
14218
14219
14220
14221
14222
14223
14224
14225
14226
14227
14228
14229
14230
14231
14232
14233
14234
14235
14236
14237
14238
14239
14240
14241
14242
14243
14244
14245
14246
14247
14248
14249
14250
14251
14252
14253
14254
14255
14256
14257
14258
14259
14260
14261
14262
14263
14264
14265
14266
14267
14268
14269
14270
14271
14272
14273
14274
14275
14276
14277
14278
14279
14280
14281
14282
14283
14284
14285
14286
14287
14288
14289
14290
14291
14292
14293
14294
14295
14296
14297
14298
14299
14300
14301
14302
14303
14304
14305
14306
14307
14308
14309
14310
14311
14312
14313
14314
14315
14316
14317
14318
14319
14320
14321
14322
14323
14324
14325
14326
14327
14328
14329
14330
14331
14332
14333
14334
14335
14336
14337
14338
14339
14340
14341
14342
14343
14344
14345
14346
14347
14348
14349
14350
14351
14352
14353
14354
14355
14356
14357
14358
14359
14360
14361
14362
14363
14364
14365
14366
14367
14368
14369
14370
14371
14372
14373
14374
14375
14376
14377
14378
14379
14380
14381
14382
14383
14384
14385
14386
14387
14388
14389
14390
14391
14392
14393
14394
14395
14396
14397
14398
14399
14400
14401
14402
14403
14404
14405
14406
14407
14408
14409
14410
14411
14412
14413
14414
14415
14416
14417
14418
14419
14420
14421
14422
14423
14424
14425
14426
14427
14428
14429
14430
14431
14432
14433
14434
14435
14436
14437
14438
14439
14440
14441
14442
14443
14444
14445
14446
14447
14448
14449
14450
14451
14452
14453
14454
14455
14456
14457
14458
14459
14460
14461
14462
14463
14464
14465
14466
14467
14468
14469
14470
14471
14472
14473
14474
14475
14476
14477
14478
14479
14480
14481
14482
14483
14484
14485
14486
14487
14488
14489
14490
14491
14492
14493
14494
14495
14496
14497
14498
14499
14500
14501
14502
14503
14504
14505
14506
14507
14508
14509
14510
14511
14512
14513
14514
14515
14516
14517
14518
14519
14520
14521
14522
14523
14524
14525
14526
14527
14528
14529
14530
14531
14532
14533
14534
14535
14536
14537
14538
14539
14540
14541
14542
14543
14544
14545
14546
14547
14548
14549
14550
14551
14552
14553
14554
14555
14556
14557
14558
14559
14560
14561
14562
14563
14564
14565
14566
14567
14568
14569
14570
14571
14572
14573
14574
14575
14576
14577
14578
14579
14580
14581
14582
14583
14584
14585
14586
14587
14588
14589
14590
14591
14592
14593
14594
14595
14596
14597
14598
14599
14600
14601
14602
14603
14604
14605
14606
14607
14608
14609
14610
14611
14612
14613
14614
14615
14616
14617
14618
14619
14620
14621
14622
14623
14624
14625
14626
14627
14628
14629
14630
14631
14632
14633
14634
14635
14636
14637
14638
14639
14640
14641
14642
14643
14644
14645
14646
14647
14648
14649
14650
14651
14652
14653
14654
14655
14656
14657
14658
14659
14660
14661
14662
14663
14664
14665
14666
14667
14668
14669
14670
14671
14672
14673
14674
14675
14676
14677
14678
14679
14680
14681
14682
14683
14684
14685
14686
14687
14688
14689
14690
14691
14692
14693
14694
14695
14696
14697
14698
14699
14700
14701
14702
14703
14704
14705
14706
14707
14708
14709
14710
14711
14712
14713
14714
14715
14716
14717
14718
14719
14720
14721
14722
14723
14724
14725
14726
14727
14728
14729
14730
14731
14732
14733
14734
14735
14736
14737
14738
14739
14740
14741
14742
14743
14744
14745
14746
14747
14748
14749
14750
14751
14752
14753
14754
14755
14756
14757
14758
14759
14760
14761
14762
14763
14764
14765
14766
14767
14768
14769
14770
14771
14772
14773
14774
14775
14776
14777
14778
14779
14780
14781
14782
14783
14784
14785
14786
14787
14788
14789
14790
14791
14792
14793
14794
14795
14796
14797
14798
14799
14800
14801
14802
14803
14804
14805
14806
14807
14808
14809
14810
14811
14812
14813
14814
14815
14816
14817
14818
14819
14820
14821
14822
14823
14824
14825
14826
14827
14828
14829
14830
14831
14832
14833
14834
14835
14836
14837
14838
14839
14840
14841
14842
14843
14844
14845
14846
14847
14848
14849
14850
14851
14852
14853
14854
14855
14856
14857
14858
14859
14860
14861
14862
14863
14864
14865
14866
14867
14868
14869
14870
14871
14872
14873
14874
14875
14876
14877
14878
14879
14880
14881
14882
14883
14884
14885
14886
14887
14888
14889
14890
14891
14892
14893
14894
14895
14896
14897
14898
14899
14900
14901
14902
14903
14904
14905
14906
14907
14908
14909
14910
14911
14912
14913
14914
14915
14916
14917
14918
14919
14920
14921
14922
14923
14924
14925
14926
14927
14928
14929
14930
14931
14932
14933
14934
14935
14936
14937
14938
14939
14940
14941
14942
14943
14944
14945
14946
14947
14948
14949
14950
14951
14952
14953
14954
14955
14956
14957
14958
14959
14960
14961
14962
14963
14964
14965
14966
14967
14968
14969
14970
14971
14972
14973
14974
14975
14976
14977
14978
14979
14980
14981
14982
14983
14984
14985
14986
14987
14988
14989
14990
14991
14992
14993
14994
14995
14996
14997
14998
14999
15000
15001
15002
15003
15004
15005
15006
15007
15008
15009
15010
15011
15012
15013
15014
15015
15016
15017
15018
15019
15020
15021
15022
15023
15024
15025
15026
15027
15028
15029
15030
15031
15032
15033
15034
15035
15036
15037
15038
15039
15040
15041
15042
15043
15044
15045
15046
15047
15048
15049
15050
15051
15052
15053
15054
15055
15056
15057
15058
15059
15060
15061
15062
15063
15064
15065
15066
15067
15068
15069
15070
15071
15072
15073
15074
15075
15076
15077
15078
15079
15080
15081
15082
15083
15084
15085
15086
15087
15088
15089
15090
15091
15092
15093
15094
15095
15096
15097
15098
15099
15100
15101
15102
15103
15104
15105
15106
15107
15108
15109
15110
15111
15112
15113
15114
15115
15116
15117
15118
15119
15120
15121
15122
15123
15124
15125
15126
15127
15128
15129
15130
15131
15132
15133
15134
15135
15136
15137
15138
15139
15140
15141
15142
15143
15144
15145
15146
15147
15148
15149
15150
15151
15152
15153
15154
15155
15156
15157
15158
15159
15160
15161
15162
15163
15164
15165
15166
15167
15168
15169
15170
15171
15172
15173
15174
15175
15176
15177
15178
15179
15180
15181
15182
15183
15184
15185
15186
15187
15188
15189
15190
15191
15192
15193
15194
15195
15196
15197
15198
15199
15200
15201
15202
15203
15204
15205
15206
15207
15208
15209
15210
15211
15212
15213
15214
15215
15216
15217
15218
15219
15220
15221
15222
15223
15224
15225
15226
15227
15228
15229
15230
15231
15232
15233
15234
15235
15236
15237
15238
15239
15240
15241
15242
15243
15244
15245
15246
15247
15248
15249
15250
15251
15252
15253
15254
15255
15256
15257
15258
15259
15260
15261
15262
15263
15264
15265
15266
15267
15268
15269
15270
15271
15272
15273
15274
15275
15276
15277
15278
15279
15280
15281
15282
15283
15284
15285
15286
15287
15288
15289
15290
15291
15292
15293
15294
15295
15296
15297
15298
15299
15300
15301
15302
15303
15304
15305
15306
15307
15308
15309
15310
15311
15312
15313
15314
15315
15316
15317
15318
15319
15320
15321
15322
15323
15324
15325
15326
15327
15328
15329
15330
15331
15332
15333
15334
15335
15336
15337
15338
15339
15340
15341
15342
15343
15344
15345
15346
15347
15348
15349
15350
15351
15352
15353
15354
15355
15356
15357
15358
15359
15360
15361
15362
15363
15364
15365
15366
15367
15368
15369
15370
15371
15372
15373
15374
15375
15376
15377
15378
15379
15380
15381
15382
15383
15384
15385
15386
15387
15388
15389
15390
15391
15392
15393
15394
15395
15396
15397
15398
15399
15400
15401
15402
15403
15404
15405
15406
15407
15408
15409
15410
15411
15412
15413
15414
15415
15416
15417
15418
15419
15420
15421
15422
15423
15424
15425
15426
15427
15428
15429
15430
15431
15432
15433
15434
15435
15436
15437
15438
15439
15440
15441
15442
15443
15444
15445
15446
15447
15448
15449
15450
15451
15452
15453
15454
15455
15456
15457
15458
15459
15460
15461
15462
15463
15464
15465
15466
15467
15468
15469
15470
15471
15472
15473
15474
15475
15476
15477
15478
15479
15480
15481
15482
15483
15484
15485
15486
15487
15488
15489
15490
15491
15492
15493
15494
15495
15496
15497
15498
15499
15500
15501
15502
15503
15504
15505
15506
15507
15508
15509
15510
15511
15512
15513
15514
15515
15516
15517
15518
15519
15520
15521
15522
15523
15524
15525
15526
15527
15528
15529
15530
15531
15532
15533
15534
15535
15536
15537
15538
15539
15540
15541
15542
15543
15544
15545
15546
15547
15548
15549
15550
15551
15552
15553
15554
15555
15556
15557
15558
15559
15560
15561
15562
15563
15564
15565
15566
15567
15568
15569
15570
15571
15572
15573
15574
15575
15576
15577
15578
15579
15580
15581
15582
15583
15584
15585
15586
15587
15588
15589
15590
15591
15592
15593
15594
15595
15596
15597
15598
15599
15600
15601
15602
15603
15604
15605
15606
15607
15608
15609
15610
15611
15612
15613
15614
15615
15616
15617
15618
15619
15620
15621
15622
15623
15624
15625
15626
15627
15628
15629
15630
15631
15632
15633
15634
15635
15636
15637
15638
15639
15640
15641
15642
15643
15644
15645
15646
15647
15648
15649
15650
15651
15652
15653
15654
15655
15656
15657
15658
15659
15660
15661
15662
15663
15664
15665
15666
15667
15668
15669
15670
15671
15672
15673
15674
15675
15676
15677
15678
15679
15680
15681
15682
15683
15684
15685
15686
15687
15688
15689
15690
15691
15692
15693
15694
15695
15696
15697
15698
15699
15700
15701
15702
15703
15704
15705
15706
15707
15708
15709
15710
15711
15712
15713
15714
15715
15716
15717
15718
15719
15720
15721
15722
15723
15724
15725
15726
15727
15728
15729
15730
15731
15732
15733
15734
15735
15736
15737
15738
15739
15740
15741
15742
15743
15744
15745
15746
15747
15748
15749
15750
15751
15752
15753
15754
15755
15756
15757
15758
15759
15760
15761
15762
15763
15764
15765
15766
15767
15768
15769
15770
15771
15772
15773
15774
15775
15776
15777
15778
15779
15780
15781
15782
15783
15784
15785
15786
15787
15788
15789
15790
15791
15792
15793
15794
15795
15796
15797
15798
15799
15800
15801
15802
15803
15804
15805
15806
15807
15808
15809
15810
15811
15812
15813
15814
15815
15816
15817
15818
15819
15820
15821
15822
15823
15824
15825
15826
15827
15828
15829
15830
15831
15832
15833
15834
15835
15836
15837
15838
15839
15840
15841
15842
15843
15844
15845
15846
15847
15848
15849
15850
15851
15852
15853
15854
15855
15856
15857
15858
15859
15860
15861
15862
15863
15864
15865
15866
15867
15868
15869
15870
15871
15872
15873
15874
15875
15876
15877
15878
15879
15880
15881
15882
15883
15884
15885
15886
15887
15888
15889
15890
15891
15892
15893
15894
15895
15896
15897
15898
15899
15900
15901
15902
15903
15904
15905
15906
15907
15908
15909
15910
15911
15912
15913
15914
15915
15916
15917
15918
15919
15920
15921
15922
15923
15924
15925
15926
15927
15928
15929
15930
15931
15932
15933
15934
15935
15936
15937
15938
15939
15940
15941
15942
15943
15944
15945
15946
15947
15948
15949
15950
15951
15952
15953
15954
15955
15956
15957
15958
15959
15960
15961
15962
15963
15964
15965
15966
15967
15968
15969
15970
15971
15972
15973
15974
15975
15976
15977
15978
15979
15980
15981
15982
15983
15984
15985
15986
15987
15988
15989
15990
15991
15992
15993
15994
15995
15996
15997
15998
15999
16000
16001
16002
16003
16004
16005
16006
16007
16008
16009
16010
16011
16012
16013
16014
16015
16016
16017
16018
16019
16020
16021
16022
16023
16024
16025
16026
16027
16028
16029
16030
16031
16032
16033
16034
16035
16036
16037
16038
16039
16040
16041
16042
16043
16044
16045
16046
16047
16048
16049
16050
16051
16052
16053
16054
16055
16056
16057
16058
16059
16060
16061
16062
16063
16064
16065
16066
16067
16068
16069
16070
16071
16072
16073
16074
16075
16076
16077
16078
16079
16080
16081
16082
16083
16084
16085
16086
16087
16088
16089
16090
16091
16092
16093
16094
16095
16096
16097
16098
16099
16100
16101
16102
16103
16104
16105
16106
16107
16108
16109
16110
16111
16112
16113
16114
16115
16116
16117
16118
16119
16120
16121
16122
16123
16124
16125
16126
16127
16128
16129
16130
16131
16132
16133
16134
16135
16136
16137
16138
16139
16140
16141
16142
16143
16144
16145
16146
16147
16148
16149
16150
16151
16152
16153
16154
16155
16156
16157
16158
16159
16160
16161
16162
16163
16164
16165
16166
16167
16168
16169
16170
16171
16172
16173
16174
16175
16176
16177
16178
16179
16180
16181
16182
16183
16184
16185
16186
16187
16188
16189
16190
16191
16192
16193
16194
16195
16196
16197
16198
16199
16200
16201
16202
16203
16204
16205
16206
16207
16208
16209
16210
16211
16212
16213
16214
16215
16216
16217
16218
16219
16220
16221
16222
16223
16224
16225
16226
16227
16228
16229
16230
16231
16232
16233
16234
16235
16236
16237
16238
16239
16240
16241
16242
16243
16244
16245
16246
16247
16248
16249
16250
16251
16252
16253
16254
16255
16256
16257
16258
16259
16260
16261
16262
16263
16264
16265
16266
16267
16268
16269
16270
16271
16272
16273
16274
16275
16276
16277
16278
16279
16280
16281
16282
16283
16284
16285
16286
16287
16288
16289
16290
16291
16292
16293
16294
16295
16296
16297
16298
16299
16300
16301
16302
16303
16304
16305
16306
16307
16308
16309
16310
16311
16312
16313
16314
16315
16316
16317
16318
16319
16320
16321
16322
16323
16324
16325
16326
16327
16328
16329
16330
16331
16332
16333
16334
16335
16336
16337
16338
16339
16340
16341
16342
16343
16344
16345
16346
16347
16348
16349
16350
16351
16352
16353
16354
16355
16356
16357
16358
16359
16360
16361
16362
16363
16364
16365
16366
16367
16368
16369
16370
16371
16372
16373
16374
16375
16376
16377
16378
16379
16380
16381
16382
16383
16384
16385
16386
16387
16388
16389
16390
16391
16392
16393
16394
16395
16396
16397
16398
16399
16400
16401
16402
16403
16404
16405
16406
16407
16408
16409
16410
16411
16412
16413
16414
16415
16416
16417
16418
16419
16420
16421
16422
16423
16424
16425
16426
16427
16428
16429
16430
16431
16432
16433
16434
16435
16436
16437
16438
16439
16440
16441
16442
16443
16444
16445
16446
16447
16448
16449
16450
16451
16452
16453
16454
16455
16456
16457
16458
16459
16460
16461
16462
16463
16464
16465
16466
16467
16468
16469
16470
16471
16472
16473
16474
16475
16476
16477
16478
16479
16480
16481
16482
16483
16484
16485
16486
16487
16488
16489
16490
16491
16492
16493
16494
16495
16496
16497
16498
16499
16500
16501
16502
16503
16504
16505
16506
16507
16508
16509
16510
16511
16512
16513
16514
16515
16516
16517
16518
16519
16520
16521
16522
16523
16524
16525
16526
16527
16528
16529
16530
16531
16532
16533
16534
16535
16536
16537
16538
16539
16540
16541
16542
16543
16544
16545
16546
16547
16548
16549
16550
16551
16552
16553
16554
16555
16556
16557
16558
16559
16560
16561
16562
16563
16564
16565
16566
16567
16568
16569
16570
16571
16572
16573
16574
16575
16576
16577
16578
16579
16580
16581
16582
16583
16584
16585
16586
16587
16588
16589
16590
16591
16592
16593
16594
16595
16596
16597
16598
16599
16600
16601
16602
16603
16604
16605
16606
16607
16608
16609
16610
16611
16612
16613
16614
16615
16616
16617
16618
16619
16620
16621
16622
16623
16624
16625
16626
16627
16628
16629
16630
16631
16632
16633
16634
16635
16636
16637
16638
16639
16640
16641
16642
16643
16644
16645
16646
16647
16648
16649
16650
16651
16652
16653
16654
16655
16656
16657
16658
16659
16660
16661
16662
16663
16664
16665
16666
16667
16668
16669
16670
16671
16672
16673
16674
16675
16676
16677
16678
16679
16680
16681
16682
16683
16684
16685
16686
16687
16688
16689
16690
16691
16692
16693
16694
16695
16696
16697
16698
16699
16700
16701
16702
16703
16704
16705
16706
16707
16708
16709
16710
16711
16712
16713
16714
16715
16716
16717
16718
16719
16720
16721
16722
16723
16724
16725
16726
16727
16728
16729
16730
16731
16732
16733
16734
16735
16736
16737
16738
16739
16740
16741
16742
16743
16744
16745
16746
16747
16748
16749
16750
16751
16752
16753
16754
16755
16756
16757
16758
16759
16760
16761
16762
16763
16764
16765
16766
16767
16768
16769
16770
16771
16772
16773
16774
16775
16776
16777
16778
16779
16780
16781
16782
16783
16784
16785
16786
16787
16788
16789
16790
16791
16792
16793
16794
16795
16796
16797
16798
16799
16800
16801
16802
16803
16804
16805
16806
16807
16808
16809
16810
16811
16812
16813
16814
16815
16816
16817
16818
16819
16820
16821
16822
16823
16824
16825
16826
16827
16828
16829
16830
16831
16832
16833
16834
16835
16836
16837
16838
16839
16840
16841
16842
16843
16844
16845
16846
16847
16848
16849
16850
16851
16852
16853
16854
16855
16856
16857
16858
16859
16860
16861
16862
16863
16864
16865
16866
16867
16868
16869
16870
16871
16872
16873
16874
16875
16876
16877
16878
16879
16880
16881
16882
16883
16884
16885
16886
16887
16888
16889
16890
16891
16892
16893
16894
16895
16896
16897
16898
16899
16900
16901
16902
16903
16904
16905
16906
16907
16908
16909
16910
16911
16912
16913
16914
16915
16916
16917
16918
16919
16920
16921
16922
16923
16924
16925
16926
16927
16928
16929
16930
16931
16932
16933
16934
16935
16936
16937
16938
16939
16940
16941
16942
16943
16944
16945
16946
16947
16948
16949
16950
16951
16952
16953
16954
16955
16956
16957
16958
16959
16960
16961
16962
16963
16964
16965
16966
16967
16968
16969
16970
16971
16972
16973
16974
16975
16976
16977
16978
16979
16980
16981
16982
16983
16984
16985
16986
16987
16988
16989
16990
16991
16992
16993
16994
16995
16996
16997
16998
16999
17000
17001
17002
17003
17004
17005
17006
17007
17008
17009
17010
17011
17012
17013
17014
17015
17016
17017
17018
17019
17020
17021
17022
17023
17024
17025
17026
17027
17028
17029
17030
17031
17032
17033
17034
17035
17036
17037
17038
17039
17040
17041
17042
17043
17044
17045
17046
17047
17048
17049
17050
17051
17052
17053
17054
17055
17056
17057
17058
17059
17060
17061
17062
17063
17064
17065
17066
17067
17068
17069
17070
17071
17072
17073
17074
17075
17076
17077
17078
17079
17080
17081
17082
17083
17084
17085
17086
17087
17088
17089
17090
17091
17092
17093
17094
17095
17096
17097
17098
17099
17100
17101
17102
17103
17104
17105
17106
17107
17108
17109
17110
17111
17112
17113
17114
17115
17116
17117
17118
17119
17120
17121
17122
17123
17124
17125
17126
17127
17128
17129
17130
17131
17132
17133
17134
17135
17136
17137
17138
17139
17140
17141
17142
17143
17144
17145
17146
17147
17148
17149
17150
17151
17152
17153
17154
17155
17156
17157
17158
17159
17160
17161
17162
17163
17164
17165
17166
17167
17168
17169
17170
17171
17172
17173
17174
17175
17176
17177
17178
17179
17180
17181
17182
17183
17184
17185
17186
17187
17188
17189
17190
17191
17192
17193
17194
17195
17196
17197
17198
17199
17200
17201
17202
17203
17204
17205
17206
17207
17208
17209
17210
17211
17212
17213
17214
17215
17216
17217
17218
17219
17220
17221
17222
17223
17224
17225
17226
17227
17228
17229
17230
17231
17232
17233
17234
17235
17236
17237
17238
17239
17240
17241
17242
17243
17244
17245
17246
17247
17248
17249
17250
17251
17252
17253
17254
17255
17256
17257
17258
17259
17260
17261
17262
17263
17264
17265
17266
17267
17268
17269
17270
17271
17272
17273
17274
17275
17276
17277
17278
17279
17280
17281
17282
17283
17284
17285
17286
17287
17288
17289
17290
17291
17292
17293
17294
17295
17296
17297
17298
17299
17300
17301
17302
17303
17304
17305
17306
17307
17308
17309
17310
17311
17312
17313
17314
17315
17316
17317
17318
17319
17320
17321
17322
17323
17324
17325
17326
17327
17328
17329
17330
17331
17332
17333
17334
17335
17336
17337
17338
17339
17340
17341
17342
17343
17344
17345
17346
17347
17348
17349
17350
17351
17352
17353
17354
17355
17356
17357
17358
17359
17360
17361
17362
17363
17364
17365
17366
17367
17368
17369
17370
17371
17372
17373
17374
17375
17376
17377
17378
17379
17380
17381
17382
17383
17384
17385
17386
17387
17388
17389
17390
17391
17392
17393
17394
17395
17396
17397
17398
17399
17400
17401
17402
17403
17404
17405
17406
17407
17408
17409
17410
17411
17412
17413
17414
17415
17416
17417
17418
17419
17420
17421
17422
17423
17424
17425
17426
17427
17428
17429
17430
17431
17432
17433
17434
17435
17436
17437
17438
17439
17440
17441
17442
17443
17444
17445
17446
17447
17448
17449
17450
17451
17452
17453
17454
17455
17456
17457
17458
17459
17460
17461
17462
17463
17464
17465
17466
17467
17468
17469
17470
17471
17472
17473
17474
17475
17476
17477
17478
17479
17480
17481
17482
17483
17484
17485
17486
17487
17488
17489
17490
17491
17492
17493
17494
17495
17496
17497
17498
17499
17500
17501
17502
17503
17504
17505
17506
17507
17508
17509
17510
17511
17512
17513
17514
17515
17516
17517
17518
17519
17520
17521
17522
17523
17524
17525
17526
17527
17528
17529
17530
17531
17532
17533
17534
17535
17536
17537
17538
17539
17540
17541
17542
17543
17544
17545
17546
17547
17548
17549
17550
17551
17552
17553
17554
17555
17556
17557
17558
17559
17560
17561
17562
17563
17564
17565
17566
17567
17568
17569
17570
17571
17572
17573
17574
17575
17576
17577
17578
17579
17580
17581
17582
17583
17584
17585
17586
17587
17588
17589
17590
17591
17592
17593
17594
17595
17596
17597
17598
17599
17600
17601
17602
17603
17604
17605
17606
17607
17608
17609
17610
17611
17612
17613
17614
17615
17616
17617
17618
17619
17620
17621
17622
17623
17624
17625
17626
17627
17628
17629
17630
17631
17632
17633
17634
17635
17636
17637
17638
17639
17640
17641
17642
17643
17644
17645
17646
17647
17648
17649
17650
17651
17652
17653
17654
17655
17656
17657
17658
17659
17660
17661
17662
17663
17664
17665
17666
17667
17668
17669
17670
17671
17672
17673
17674
17675
17676
17677
17678
17679
17680
17681
17682
17683
17684
17685
17686
17687
17688
17689
17690
17691
17692
17693
17694
17695
17696
17697
17698
17699
17700
17701
17702
17703
17704
17705
17706
17707
17708
17709
17710
17711
17712
17713
17714
17715
17716
17717
17718
17719
17720
17721
17722
17723
17724
17725
17726
17727
17728
17729
17730
17731
17732
17733
17734
17735
17736
17737
17738
17739
17740
17741
17742
17743
17744
17745
17746
17747
17748
17749
17750
17751
17752
17753
17754
17755
17756
17757
17758
17759
17760
17761
17762
17763
17764
17765
17766
17767
17768
17769
17770
17771
17772
17773
17774
17775
17776
17777
17778
17779
17780
17781
17782
17783
17784
17785
17786
17787
17788
17789
17790
17791
17792
17793
17794
17795
17796
17797
17798
17799
17800
17801
17802
17803
17804
17805
17806
17807
17808
17809
17810
17811
17812
17813
17814
17815
17816
17817
17818
17819
17820
17821
17822
17823
17824
17825
17826
17827
17828
17829
17830
17831
17832
17833
17834
17835
17836
17837
17838
17839
17840
17841
17842
17843
17844
17845
17846
17847
17848
17849
17850
17851
17852
17853
17854
17855
17856
17857
17858
17859
17860
17861
17862
17863
17864
17865
17866
17867
17868
17869
17870
17871
17872
17873
17874
17875
17876
17877
17878
17879
17880
17881
17882
17883
17884
17885
17886
17887
17888
17889
17890
17891
17892
17893
17894
17895
17896
17897
17898
17899
17900
17901
17902
17903
17904
17905
17906
17907
17908
17909
17910
17911
17912
17913
17914
17915
17916
17917
17918
17919
17920
17921
17922
17923
17924
17925
17926
17927
17928
17929
17930
17931
17932
17933
17934
17935
17936
17937
17938
17939
17940
17941
17942
17943
17944
17945
17946
17947
17948
17949
17950
17951
17952
17953
17954
17955
17956
17957
17958
17959
17960
17961
17962
17963
17964
17965
17966
17967
17968
17969
17970
17971
17972
17973
17974
17975
17976
17977
17978
17979
17980
17981
17982
17983
17984
17985
17986
17987
17988
17989
17990
17991
17992
17993
17994
17995
17996
17997
17998
17999
18000
18001
18002
18003
18004
18005
18006
18007
18008
18009
18010
18011
18012
18013
18014
18015
18016
18017
18018
18019
18020
18021
18022
18023
18024
18025
18026
18027
18028
18029
18030
18031
18032
18033
18034
18035
18036
18037
18038
18039
18040
18041
18042
18043
18044
18045
18046
18047
18048
18049
18050
18051
18052
18053
18054
18055
18056
18057
18058
18059
18060
18061
18062
18063
18064
18065
18066
18067
18068
18069
18070
18071
18072
18073
18074
18075
18076
18077
18078
18079
18080
18081
18082
18083
18084
18085
18086
18087
18088
18089
18090
18091
18092
18093
18094
18095
18096
18097
18098
18099
18100
18101
18102
18103
18104
18105
18106
18107
18108
18109
18110
18111
18112
18113
18114
18115
18116
18117
18118
18119
18120
18121
18122
18123
18124
18125
18126
18127
18128
18129
18130
18131
18132
18133
18134
18135
18136
18137
18138
18139
18140
18141
18142
18143
18144
18145
18146
18147
18148
18149
18150
18151
18152
18153
18154
18155
18156
18157
18158
18159
18160
18161
18162
18163
18164
18165
18166
18167
18168
18169
18170
18171
18172
18173
18174
18175
18176
18177
18178
18179
18180
18181
18182
18183
18184
18185
18186
18187
18188
18189
18190
18191
18192
18193
18194
18195
18196
18197
18198
18199
18200
18201
18202
18203
18204
18205
18206
18207
18208
18209
18210
18211
18212
18213
18214
18215
18216
18217
18218
18219
18220
18221
18222
18223
18224
18225
18226
18227
18228
18229
18230
18231
18232
18233
18234
18235
18236
18237
18238
18239
18240
18241
18242
18243
18244
18245
18246
18247
18248
18249
18250
18251
18252
18253
18254
18255
18256
18257
18258
18259
18260
18261
18262
18263
18264
18265
18266
18267
18268
18269
18270
18271
18272
18273
18274
18275
18276
18277
18278
18279
18280
18281
18282
18283
18284
18285
18286
18287
18288
18289
18290
18291
18292
18293
18294
18295
18296
18297
18298
18299
18300
18301
18302
18303
18304
18305
18306
18307
18308
18309
18310
18311
18312
18313
18314
18315
18316
18317
18318
18319
18320
18321
18322
18323
18324
18325
18326
18327
18328
18329
18330
18331
18332
18333
18334
18335
18336
18337
18338
18339
18340
18341
18342
18343
18344
18345
18346
18347
18348
18349
18350
18351
18352
18353
18354
18355
18356
18357
18358
18359
18360
18361
18362
18363
18364
18365
18366
18367
18368
18369
18370
18371
18372
18373
18374
18375
18376
18377
18378
18379
18380
18381
18382
18383
18384
18385
18386
18387
18388
18389
18390
18391
18392
18393
18394
18395
18396
18397
18398
18399
18400
18401
18402
18403
18404
18405
18406
18407
18408
18409
18410
18411
18412
18413
18414
18415
18416
18417
18418
18419
18420
18421
18422
18423
18424
18425
18426
18427
18428
18429
18430
18431
18432
18433
18434
18435
18436
18437
18438
18439
18440
18441
18442
18443
18444
18445
18446
18447
18448
18449
18450
18451
18452
18453
18454
18455
18456
18457
18458
18459
18460
18461
18462
18463
18464
18465
18466
18467
18468
18469
18470
18471
18472
18473
18474
18475
18476
18477
18478
18479
18480
18481
18482
18483
18484
18485
18486
18487
18488
18489
18490
18491
18492
18493
18494
18495
18496
18497
18498
18499
18500
18501
18502
18503
18504
18505
18506
18507
18508
18509
18510
18511
18512
18513
18514
18515
18516
18517
18518
18519
18520
18521
18522
18523
18524
18525
18526
18527
18528
18529
18530
18531
18532
18533
18534
18535
18536
18537
18538
18539
18540
18541
18542
18543
18544
18545
18546
18547
18548
18549
18550
18551
18552
18553
18554
18555
18556
18557
18558
18559
18560
18561
18562
18563
18564
18565
18566
18567
18568
18569
18570
18571
18572
18573
18574
18575
18576
18577
18578
18579
18580
18581
18582
18583
18584
18585
18586
18587
18588
18589
18590
18591
18592
18593
18594
18595
18596
18597
18598
18599
18600
18601
18602
18603
18604
18605
18606
18607
18608
18609
18610
18611
18612
18613
18614
18615
18616
18617
18618
18619
18620
18621
18622
18623
18624
18625
18626
18627
18628
18629
18630
18631
18632
18633
18634
18635
18636
18637
18638
18639
18640
18641
18642
18643
18644
18645
18646
18647
18648
18649
18650
18651
18652
18653
18654
18655
18656
18657
18658
18659
18660
18661
18662
18663
18664
18665
18666
18667
18668
18669
18670
18671
18672
18673
18674
18675
18676
18677
18678
18679
18680
18681
18682
18683
18684
18685
18686
18687
18688
18689
18690
18691
18692
18693
18694
18695
18696
18697
18698
18699
18700
18701
18702
18703
18704
18705
18706
18707
18708
18709
18710
18711
18712
18713
18714
18715
18716
18717
18718
18719
18720
18721
18722
18723
18724
18725
18726
18727
18728
18729
18730
18731
18732
18733
18734
18735
18736
18737
18738
18739
18740
18741
18742
18743
18744
18745
18746
18747
18748
18749
18750
18751
18752
18753
18754
18755
18756
18757
18758
18759
18760
18761
18762
18763
18764
18765
18766
18767
18768
18769
18770
18771
18772
18773
18774
18775
18776
18777
18778
18779
18780
18781
18782
18783
18784
18785
18786
18787
18788
18789
18790
18791
18792
18793
18794
18795
18796
18797
18798
18799
18800
18801
18802
18803
18804
18805
18806
18807
18808
18809
18810
18811
18812
18813
18814
18815
18816
18817
18818
18819
18820
18821
18822
18823
18824
18825
18826
18827
18828
18829
18830
18831
18832
18833
18834
18835
18836
18837
18838
18839
18840
18841
18842
18843
18844
18845
18846
18847
18848
18849
18850
18851
18852
18853
18854
18855
18856
18857
18858
18859
18860
18861
18862
18863
18864
18865
18866
18867
18868
18869
18870
18871
18872
18873
18874
18875
18876
18877
18878
18879
18880
18881
18882
18883
18884
18885
18886
18887
18888
18889
18890
18891
18892
18893
18894
18895
18896
18897
18898
18899
18900
18901
18902
18903
18904
18905
18906
18907
18908
18909
18910
18911
18912
18913
18914
18915
18916
18917
18918
18919
18920
18921
18922
18923
18924
18925
18926
18927
18928
18929
18930
18931
18932
18933
18934
18935
18936
18937
18938
18939
18940
18941
18942
18943
18944
18945
18946
18947
18948
18949
18950
18951
18952
18953
18954
18955
18956
18957
18958
18959
18960
18961
18962
18963
18964
18965
18966
18967
18968
18969
18970
18971
18972
18973
18974
18975
18976
18977
18978
18979
18980
18981
18982
18983
18984
18985
18986
18987
18988
18989
18990
18991
18992
18993
18994
18995
18996
18997
18998
18999
19000
19001
19002
19003
19004
19005
19006
19007
19008
19009
19010
19011
19012
19013
19014
19015
19016
19017
19018
19019
19020
19021
19022
19023
19024
19025
19026
19027
19028
19029
19030
19031
19032
19033
19034
19035
19036
19037
19038
19039
19040
19041
19042
19043
19044
19045
19046
19047
19048
19049
19050
19051
19052
19053
19054
19055
19056
19057
19058
19059
19060
19061
19062
19063
19064
19065
19066
19067
19068
19069
19070
19071
19072
19073
19074
19075
19076
19077
19078
19079
19080
19081
19082
19083
19084
19085
19086
19087
19088
19089
19090
19091
19092
19093
19094
19095
19096
19097
19098
19099
19100
19101
19102
19103
19104
19105
19106
19107
19108
19109
19110
19111
19112
19113
19114
19115
19116
19117
19118
19119
19120
19121
19122
19123
19124
19125
19126
19127
19128
19129
19130
19131
19132
19133
19134
19135
19136
19137
19138
19139
19140
19141
19142
19143
19144
19145
19146
19147
19148
19149
19150
19151
19152
19153
19154
19155
19156
19157
19158
19159
19160
19161
19162
19163
19164
19165
19166
19167
19168
19169
19170
19171
19172
19173
19174
19175
19176
19177
19178
19179
19180
19181
19182
19183
19184
19185
19186
19187
19188
19189
19190
19191
19192
19193
19194
19195
19196
19197
19198
19199
19200
19201
19202
19203
19204
19205
19206
19207
19208
19209
19210
19211
19212
19213
19214
19215
19216
19217
19218
19219
19220
19221
19222
19223
19224
19225
19226
19227
19228
19229
19230
19231
19232
19233
19234
19235
19236
19237
19238
19239
19240
19241
19242
19243
19244
19245
19246
19247
19248
19249
19250
19251
19252
19253
19254
19255
19256
19257
19258
19259
19260
19261
19262
19263
19264
19265
19266
19267
19268
19269
19270
19271
19272
19273
19274
19275
19276
19277
19278
19279
19280
19281
19282
19283
19284
19285
19286
19287
19288
19289
19290
19291
19292
19293
19294
19295
19296
19297
19298
19299
19300
19301
19302
19303
19304
19305
19306
19307
19308
19309
19310
19311
19312
19313
19314
19315
19316
19317
19318
19319
19320
19321
19322
19323
19324
19325
19326
19327
19328
19329
19330
19331
19332
19333
19334
19335
19336
19337
19338
19339
19340
19341
19342
19343
19344
19345
19346
19347
19348
19349
19350
19351
19352
19353
19354
19355
19356
19357
19358
19359
19360
19361
19362
19363
19364
19365
19366
19367
19368
19369
19370
19371
19372
19373
19374
19375
19376
19377
19378
19379
19380
19381
19382
19383
19384
19385
19386
19387
19388
19389
19390
19391
19392
19393
19394
19395
19396
19397
19398
19399
19400
19401
19402
19403
19404
19405
19406
19407
19408
19409
19410
19411
19412
19413
19414
19415
19416
19417
19418
19419
19420
19421
19422
19423
19424
19425
19426
19427
19428
19429
19430
19431
19432
19433
19434
19435
19436
19437
19438
19439
19440
19441
19442
19443
19444
19445
19446
19447
19448
19449
19450
19451
19452
19453
19454
19455
19456
19457
19458
19459
19460
19461
19462
19463
19464
19465
19466
19467
19468
19469
19470
19471
19472
19473
19474
19475
19476
19477
19478
19479
19480
19481
19482
19483
19484
19485
19486
19487
19488
19489
19490
19491
19492
19493
19494
19495
19496
19497
19498
19499
19500
19501
19502
19503
19504
19505
19506
19507
19508
19509
19510
19511
19512
19513
19514
19515
19516
19517
19518
19519
19520
19521
19522
19523
19524
19525
19526
19527
19528
19529
19530
19531
19532
19533
19534
19535
19536
19537
19538
19539
19540
19541
19542
19543
19544
19545
19546
19547
19548
19549
19550
19551
19552
19553
19554
19555
19556
19557
19558
19559
19560
19561
19562
19563
19564
19565
19566
19567
19568
19569
19570
19571
19572
19573
19574
19575
19576
19577
19578
19579
19580
19581
19582
19583
19584
19585
19586
19587
19588
19589
19590
19591
19592
19593
19594
19595
19596
19597
19598
19599
19600
19601
19602
19603
19604
19605
19606
19607
19608
19609
19610
19611
19612
19613
19614
19615
19616
19617
19618
19619
19620
19621
19622
19623
19624
19625
19626
19627
19628
19629
19630
19631
19632
19633
19634
19635
19636
19637
19638
19639
19640
19641
19642
19643
19644
19645
19646
19647
19648
19649
19650
19651
19652
19653
19654
19655
19656
19657
19658
19659
19660
19661
19662
19663
19664
19665
19666
19667
19668
19669
19670
19671
19672
19673
19674
19675
19676
19677
19678
19679
19680
19681
19682
19683
19684
19685
19686
19687
19688
19689
19690
19691
19692
19693
19694
19695
19696
19697
19698
19699
19700
19701
19702
19703
19704
19705
19706
19707
19708
19709
19710
19711
19712
19713
19714
19715
19716
19717
19718
19719
19720
19721
19722
19723
19724
19725
19726
19727
19728
19729
19730
19731
19732
19733
19734
19735
19736
19737
19738
19739
19740
19741
19742
19743
19744
19745
19746
19747
19748
19749
19750
19751
19752
19753
19754
19755
19756
19757
19758
19759
19760
19761
19762
19763
19764
19765
19766
19767
19768
19769
19770
19771
19772
19773
19774
19775
19776
19777
19778
19779
19780
19781
19782
19783
19784
19785
19786
19787
19788
19789
19790
19791
19792
19793
19794
19795
19796
19797
19798
19799
19800
19801
19802
19803
19804
19805
19806
19807
19808
19809
19810
19811
19812
19813
19814
19815
19816
19817
19818
19819
19820
19821
19822
19823
19824
19825
19826
19827
19828
19829
19830
19831
19832
19833
19834
19835
19836
19837
19838
19839
19840
19841
19842
19843
19844
19845
19846
19847
19848
19849
19850
19851
19852
19853
19854
19855
19856
19857
19858
19859
19860
19861
19862
19863
19864
19865
19866
19867
19868
19869
19870
19871
19872
19873
19874
19875
19876
19877
19878
19879
19880
19881
19882
19883
19884
19885
19886
19887
19888
19889
19890
19891
19892
19893
19894
19895
19896
19897
19898
19899
19900
19901
19902
19903
19904
19905
19906
19907
19908
19909
19910
19911
19912
19913
19914
19915
19916
19917
19918
19919
19920
19921
19922
19923
19924
19925
19926
19927
19928
19929
19930
19931
19932
19933
19934
19935
19936
19937
19938
19939
19940
19941
19942
19943
19944
19945
19946
19947
19948
19949
19950
19951
19952
19953
19954
19955
19956
19957
19958
19959
19960
19961
19962
19963
19964
19965
19966
19967
19968
19969
19970
19971
19972
19973
19974
19975
19976
19977
19978
19979
19980
19981
19982
19983
19984
19985
19986
19987
19988
19989
19990
19991
19992
19993
19994
19995
19996
19997
19998
19999
20000
20001
20002
20003
20004
20005
20006
20007
20008
20009
20010
20011
20012
20013
20014
20015
20016
20017
20018
20019
20020
20021
20022
20023
20024
20025
20026
20027
20028
20029
20030
20031
20032
20033
20034
20035
20036
20037
20038
20039
20040
20041
20042
20043
20044
20045
20046
20047
20048
20049
20050
20051
20052
20053
20054
20055
20056
20057
20058
20059
20060
20061
20062
20063
20064
20065
20066
20067
20068
20069
20070
20071
20072
20073
20074
20075
20076
20077
20078
20079
20080
20081
20082
20083
20084
20085
20086
20087
20088
20089
20090
20091
20092
20093
20094
20095
20096
20097
20098
20099
20100
20101
20102
20103
20104
20105
20106
20107
20108
20109
20110
20111
20112
20113
20114
20115
20116
20117
20118
20119
20120
20121
20122
20123
20124
20125
20126
20127
20128
20129
20130
20131
20132
20133
20134
20135
20136
20137
20138
20139
20140
20141
20142
20143
20144
20145
20146
20147
20148
20149
20150
20151
20152
20153
20154
20155
20156
20157
20158
20159
20160
20161
20162
20163
20164
20165
20166
20167
20168
20169
20170
20171
20172
20173
20174
20175
20176
20177
20178
20179
20180
20181
20182
20183
20184
20185
20186
20187
20188
20189
20190
20191
20192
20193
20194
20195
20196
20197
20198
20199
20200
20201
20202
20203
20204
20205
20206
20207
20208
20209
20210
20211
20212
20213
20214
20215
20216
20217
20218
20219
20220
20221
20222
20223
20224
20225
20226
20227
20228
20229
20230
20231
20232
20233
20234
20235
20236
20237
20238
20239
20240
20241
20242
20243
20244
20245
20246
20247
20248
20249
20250
20251
20252
20253
20254
20255
20256
20257
20258
20259
20260
20261
20262
20263
20264
20265
20266
20267
20268
20269
20270
20271
20272
20273
20274
20275
20276
20277
20278
20279
20280
20281
20282
20283
20284
20285
20286
20287
20288
20289
20290
20291
20292
20293
20294
20295
20296
20297
20298
20299
20300
20301
20302
20303
20304
20305
20306
20307
20308
20309
20310
20311
20312
20313
20314
20315
20316
20317
20318
20319
20320
20321
20322
20323
20324
20325
20326
20327
20328
20329
20330
20331
20332
20333
20334
20335
20336
20337
20338
20339
20340
20341
20342
20343
20344
20345
20346
20347
20348
20349
20350
20351
20352
20353
20354
20355
20356
20357
20358
20359
20360
20361
20362
20363
20364
20365
20366
20367
20368
20369
20370
20371
20372
20373
20374
20375
20376
20377
20378
20379
20380
20381
20382
20383
20384
20385
20386
20387
20388
20389
20390
20391
20392
20393
20394
20395
20396
20397
20398
20399
20400
20401
20402
20403
20404
20405
20406
20407
20408
20409
20410
20411
20412
20413
20414
20415
20416
20417
20418
20419
20420
20421
20422
20423
20424
20425
20426
20427
20428
20429
20430
20431
20432
20433
20434
20435
20436
20437
20438
20439
20440
20441
20442
20443
20444
20445
20446
20447
20448
20449
20450
20451
20452
20453
20454
20455
20456
20457
20458
20459
20460
20461
20462
20463
20464
20465
20466
20467
20468
20469
20470
20471
20472
20473
20474
20475
20476
20477
20478
20479
20480
20481
20482
20483
20484
20485
20486
20487
20488
20489
20490
20491
20492
20493
20494
20495
20496
20497
20498
20499
20500
20501
20502
20503
20504
20505
20506
20507
20508
20509
20510
20511
20512
20513
20514
20515
20516
20517
20518
20519
20520
20521
20522
20523
20524
20525
20526
20527
20528
20529
20530
20531
20532
20533
20534
20535
20536
20537
20538
20539
20540
20541
20542
20543
20544
20545
20546
20547
20548
20549
20550
20551
20552
20553
20554
20555
20556
20557
20558
20559
20560
20561
20562
20563
20564
20565
20566
20567
20568
20569
20570
20571
20572
20573
20574
20575
20576
20577
20578
20579
20580
20581
20582
20583
20584
20585
20586
20587
20588
20589
20590
20591
20592
20593
20594
20595
20596
20597
20598
20599
20600
20601
20602
20603
20604
20605
20606
20607
20608
20609
20610
20611
20612
20613
20614
20615
20616
20617
20618
20619
20620
20621
20622
20623
20624
20625
20626
20627
20628
20629
20630
20631
20632
20633
20634
20635
20636
20637
20638
20639
20640
20641
20642
20643
20644
20645
20646
20647
20648
20649
20650
20651
20652
20653
20654
20655
20656
20657
20658
20659
20660
20661
20662
20663
20664
20665
20666
20667
20668
20669
20670
20671
20672
20673
20674
20675
20676
20677
20678
20679
20680
20681
20682
20683
20684
20685
20686
20687
20688
20689
20690
20691
20692
20693
20694
20695
20696
20697
20698
20699
20700
20701
20702
20703
20704
20705
20706
20707
20708
20709
20710
20711
20712
20713
20714
20715
20716
20717
20718
20719
20720
20721
20722
20723
20724
20725
20726
20727
20728
20729
20730
20731
20732
20733
20734
20735
20736
20737
20738
20739
20740
20741
20742
20743
20744
20745
20746
20747
20748
20749
20750
20751
20752
20753
20754
20755
20756
20757
20758
20759
20760
20761
20762
20763
20764
20765
20766
20767
20768
20769
20770
20771
20772
20773
20774
20775
20776
20777
20778
20779
20780
20781
20782
20783
20784
20785
20786
20787
20788
20789
20790
20791
20792
20793
20794
20795
20796
20797
20798
20799
20800
20801
20802
20803
20804
20805
20806
20807
20808
20809
20810
20811
20812
20813
20814
20815
20816
20817
20818
20819
20820
20821
20822
20823
20824
20825
20826
20827
20828
20829
20830
20831
20832
20833
20834
20835
20836
20837
20838
20839
20840
20841
20842
20843
20844
20845
20846
20847
20848
20849
20850
20851
20852
20853
20854
20855
20856
20857
20858
20859
20860
20861
20862
20863
20864
20865
20866
20867
20868
20869
20870
20871
20872
20873
20874
20875
20876
20877
20878
20879
20880
20881
20882
20883
20884
20885
20886
20887
20888
20889
20890
20891
20892
20893
20894
20895
20896
20897
20898
20899
20900
20901
20902
20903
20904
20905
20906
20907
20908
20909
20910
20911
20912
20913
20914
20915
20916
20917
20918
20919
20920
20921
20922
20923
20924
20925
20926
20927
20928
20929
20930
20931
20932
20933
20934
20935
20936
20937
20938
20939
20940
20941
20942
20943
20944
20945
20946
20947
20948
20949
20950
20951
20952
20953
20954
20955
20956
20957
20958
20959
20960
20961
20962
20963
20964
20965
20966
20967
20968
20969
20970
20971
20972
20973
20974
20975
20976
20977
20978
20979
20980
20981
20982
20983
20984
20985
20986
20987
20988
20989
20990
20991
20992
20993
20994
20995
20996
20997
20998
20999
21000
21001
21002
21003
21004
21005
21006
21007
21008
21009
21010
21011
21012
21013
21014
21015
21016
21017
21018
21019
21020
21021
21022
21023
21024
21025
21026
21027
21028
21029
21030
21031
21032
21033
21034
21035
21036
21037
21038
21039
21040
21041
21042
21043
21044
21045
21046
21047
21048
21049
21050
21051
21052
21053
21054
21055
21056
21057
21058
21059
21060
21061
21062
21063
21064
21065
21066
21067
21068
21069
21070
21071
21072
21073
21074
21075
21076
21077
21078
21079
21080
21081
21082
21083
21084
21085
21086
21087
21088
21089
21090
21091
21092
21093
21094
21095
21096
21097
21098
21099
21100
21101
21102
21103
21104
21105
21106
21107
21108
21109
21110
21111
21112
21113
21114
21115
21116
21117
21118
21119
21120
21121
21122
21123
21124
21125
21126
21127
21128
21129
21130
21131
21132
21133
21134
21135
21136
21137
21138
21139
21140
21141
21142
21143
21144
21145
21146
21147
21148
21149
21150
21151
21152
21153
21154
21155
21156
21157
21158
21159
21160
21161
21162
21163
21164
21165
21166
21167
21168
21169
21170
21171
21172
21173
21174
21175
21176
21177
21178
21179
21180
21181
21182
21183
21184
21185
21186
21187
21188
21189
21190
21191
21192
21193
21194
21195
21196
21197
21198
21199
21200
21201
21202
21203
21204
21205
21206
21207
21208
21209
21210
21211
21212
21213
21214
21215
21216
21217
21218
21219
21220
21221
21222
21223
21224
21225
21226
21227
21228
21229
21230
21231
21232
21233
21234
21235
21236
21237
21238
21239
21240
21241
21242
21243
21244
21245
21246
21247
21248
21249
21250
21251
21252
21253
21254
21255
21256
21257
21258
21259
21260
21261
21262
21263
21264
21265
21266
21267
21268
21269
21270
21271
21272
21273
21274
21275
21276
21277
21278
21279
21280
21281
21282
21283
21284
21285
21286
21287
21288
21289
21290
21291
21292
21293
21294
21295
21296
21297
21298
21299
21300
21301
21302
21303
21304
21305
21306
21307
21308
21309
21310
21311
21312
21313
21314
21315
21316
21317
21318
21319
21320
21321
21322
21323
21324
21325
21326
21327
21328
21329
21330
21331
21332
21333
21334
21335
21336
21337
21338
21339
21340
21341
21342
21343
21344
21345
21346
21347
21348
21349
21350
21351
21352
21353
21354
21355
21356
21357
21358
21359
21360
21361
21362
21363
21364
21365
21366
21367
21368
21369
21370
21371
21372
21373
21374
21375
21376
21377
21378
21379
21380
21381
21382
21383
21384
21385
21386
21387
21388
21389
21390
21391
21392
21393
21394
21395
21396
21397
21398
21399
21400
21401
21402
21403
21404
21405
21406
21407
21408
21409
21410
21411
21412
21413
21414
21415
21416
21417
21418
21419
21420
21421
21422
21423
21424
21425
21426
21427
21428
21429
21430
21431
21432
21433
21434
21435
21436
21437
21438
21439
21440
21441
21442
21443
21444
21445
21446
21447
21448
21449
21450
21451
21452
21453
21454
21455
21456
21457
21458
21459
21460
21461
21462
21463
21464
21465
21466
21467
21468
21469
21470
21471
21472
21473
21474
21475
21476
21477
21478
21479
21480
21481
21482
21483
21484
21485
21486
21487
21488
21489
21490
21491
21492
21493
21494
21495
21496
21497
21498
21499
21500
21501
21502
21503
21504
21505
21506
21507
21508
21509
21510
21511
21512
21513
21514
21515
21516
21517
21518
21519
21520
21521
21522
21523
21524
21525
21526
21527
21528
21529
21530
21531
21532
21533
21534
21535
21536
21537
21538
21539
21540
21541
21542
21543
21544
21545
21546
21547
21548
21549
21550
21551
21552
21553
21554
21555
21556
21557
21558
21559
21560
21561
21562
21563
21564
21565
21566
21567
21568
21569
21570
21571
21572
21573
21574
21575
21576
21577
21578
21579
21580
21581
21582
21583
21584
21585
21586
21587
21588
21589
21590
21591
21592
21593
21594
21595
21596
21597
21598
21599
21600
21601
21602
21603
21604
21605
21606
21607
21608
21609
21610
21611
21612
21613
21614
21615
21616
21617
21618
21619
21620
21621
21622
21623
21624
21625
21626
21627
21628
21629
21630
21631
21632
21633
21634
21635
21636
21637
21638
21639
21640
21641
21642
21643
21644
21645
21646
21647
21648
21649
21650
21651
21652
21653
21654
21655
21656
21657
21658
21659
21660
21661
21662
21663
21664
21665
21666
21667
21668
21669
21670
21671
21672
21673
21674
21675
21676
21677
21678
21679
21680
21681
21682
21683
21684
21685
21686
21687
21688
21689
21690
21691
21692
21693
21694
21695
21696
21697
21698
21699
21700
21701
21702
21703
21704
21705
21706
21707
21708
21709
21710
21711
21712
21713
21714
21715
21716
21717
21718
21719
21720
21721
21722
21723
21724
21725
21726
21727
21728
21729
21730
21731
21732
21733
21734
21735
21736
21737
21738
21739
21740
21741
21742
21743
21744
21745
21746
21747
21748
21749
21750
21751
21752
21753
21754
21755
21756
21757
21758
21759
21760
21761
21762
21763
21764
21765
21766
21767
21768
21769
21770
21771
21772
21773
21774
21775
21776
21777
21778
21779
21780
21781
21782
21783
21784
21785
21786
21787
21788
21789
21790
21791
21792
21793
21794
21795
21796
21797
21798
21799
21800
21801
21802
21803
21804
21805
21806
21807
21808
21809
21810
21811
21812
21813
21814
21815
21816
21817
21818
21819
21820
21821
21822
21823
21824
21825
21826
21827
21828
21829
21830
21831
21832
21833
21834
21835
21836
21837
21838
21839
21840
21841
21842
21843
21844
21845
21846
21847
21848
21849
21850
21851
21852
21853
21854
21855
21856
21857
21858
21859
21860
21861
21862
21863
21864
21865
21866
21867
21868
21869
21870
21871
21872
21873
21874
21875
21876
21877
21878
21879
21880
21881
21882
21883
21884
21885
21886
21887
21888
21889
21890
21891
21892
21893
21894
21895
21896
21897
21898
21899
21900
21901
21902
21903
21904
21905
21906
21907
21908
21909
21910
21911
21912
21913
21914
21915
21916
21917
21918
21919
21920
21921
21922
21923
21924
21925
21926
21927
21928
21929
21930
21931
21932
21933
21934
21935
21936
21937
21938
21939
21940
21941
21942
21943
21944
21945
21946
21947
21948
21949
21950
21951
21952
21953
21954
21955
21956
21957
21958
21959
21960
21961
21962
21963
21964
21965
21966
21967
21968
21969
21970
21971
21972
21973
21974
21975
21976
21977
21978
21979
21980
21981
21982
21983
21984
21985
21986
21987
21988
21989
21990
21991
21992
21993
21994
21995
21996
21997
21998
21999
22000
22001
22002
22003
22004
22005
22006
22007
22008
22009
22010
22011
22012
22013
22014
22015
22016
22017
22018
22019
22020
22021
22022
22023
22024
22025
22026
22027
22028
22029
22030
22031
22032
22033
22034
22035
22036
22037
22038
22039
22040
22041
22042
22043
22044
22045
22046
22047
22048
22049
22050
22051
22052
22053
22054
22055
22056
22057
22058
22059
22060
22061
22062
22063
22064
22065
22066
22067
22068
22069
22070
22071
22072
22073
22074
22075
22076
22077
22078
22079
22080
22081
22082
22083
22084
22085
22086
22087
22088
22089
22090
22091
22092
22093
22094
22095
22096
22097
22098
22099
22100
22101
22102
22103
22104
22105
22106
22107
22108
22109
22110
22111
22112
22113
22114
22115
22116
22117
22118
22119
22120
22121
22122
22123
22124
22125
22126
22127
22128
22129
22130
22131
22132
22133
22134
22135
22136
22137
22138
22139
22140
22141
22142
22143
22144
22145
22146
22147
22148
22149
22150
22151
22152
22153
22154
22155
22156
22157
22158
22159
22160
22161
22162
22163
22164
22165
22166
22167
22168
22169
22170
22171
22172
22173
22174
22175
22176
22177
22178
22179
22180
22181
22182
22183
22184
22185
22186
22187
22188
22189
22190
22191
22192
22193
22194
22195
22196
22197
22198
22199
22200
22201
22202
22203
22204
22205
22206
22207
22208
22209
22210
22211
22212
22213
22214
22215
22216
22217
22218
22219
22220
22221
22222
22223
22224
22225
22226
22227
22228
22229
22230
22231
22232
22233
22234
22235
22236
22237
22238
22239
22240
22241
22242
22243
22244
22245
22246
22247
22248
22249
22250
22251
22252
22253
22254
22255
22256
22257
22258
22259
22260
22261
22262
22263
22264
22265
22266
22267
22268
22269
22270
22271
22272
22273
22274
22275
22276
22277
22278
22279
22280
22281
22282
22283
22284
22285
22286
22287
22288
22289
22290
22291
22292
22293
22294
22295
22296
22297
22298
22299
22300
22301
22302
22303
22304
22305
22306
22307
22308
22309
22310
22311
22312
22313
22314
22315
22316
22317
22318
22319
22320
22321
22322
22323
22324
22325
22326
22327
22328
22329
22330
22331
22332
22333
22334
22335
22336
22337
22338
22339
22340
22341
22342
22343
22344
22345
22346
22347
22348
22349
22350
22351
22352
22353
22354
22355
22356
22357
22358
22359
22360
22361
22362
22363
22364
22365
22366
22367
22368
22369
22370
22371
22372
22373
22374
22375
22376
22377
22378
22379
22380
22381
22382
22383
22384
22385
22386
22387
22388
22389
22390
22391
22392
22393
22394
22395
22396
22397
22398
22399
22400
22401
22402
22403
22404
22405
22406
22407
22408
22409
22410
22411
22412
22413
22414
22415
22416
22417
22418
22419
22420
22421
22422
22423
22424
22425
22426
22427
22428
22429
22430
22431
22432
22433
22434
22435
22436
22437
22438
22439
22440
22441
22442
22443
22444
22445
22446
22447
22448
22449
22450
22451
22452
22453
22454
22455
22456
22457
22458
22459
22460
22461
22462
22463
22464
22465
22466
22467
22468
22469
22470
22471
22472
22473
22474
22475
22476
22477
22478
22479
22480
22481
22482
22483
22484
22485
22486
22487
22488
22489
22490
22491
22492
22493
22494
22495
22496
22497
22498
22499
22500
22501
22502
22503
22504
22505
22506
22507
22508
22509
22510
22511
22512
22513
22514
22515
22516
22517
22518
22519
22520
22521
22522
22523
22524
22525
22526
22527
22528
22529
22530
22531
22532
22533
22534
22535
22536
22537
22538
22539
22540
22541
22542
22543
22544
22545
22546
22547
22548
22549
22550
22551
22552
22553
22554
22555
22556
22557
22558
22559
22560
22561
22562
22563
22564
22565
22566
22567
22568
22569
22570
22571
22572
22573
22574
22575
22576
22577
22578
22579
22580
22581
22582
22583
22584
22585
22586
22587
22588
22589
22590
22591
22592
22593
22594
22595
22596
22597
22598
22599
22600
22601
22602
22603
22604
22605
22606
22607
22608
22609
22610
22611
22612
22613
22614
22615
22616
22617
22618
22619
22620
22621
22622
22623
22624
22625
22626
22627
22628
22629
22630
22631
22632
22633
22634
22635
22636
22637
22638
22639
22640
22641
22642
22643
22644
22645
22646
22647
22648
22649
22650
22651
22652
22653
22654
22655
22656
22657
22658
22659
22660
22661
22662
22663
22664
22665
22666
22667
22668
22669
22670
22671
22672
22673
22674
22675
22676
22677
22678
22679
22680
22681
22682
22683
22684
22685
22686
22687
22688
22689
22690
22691
22692
22693
22694
22695
22696
22697
22698
22699
22700
22701
22702
22703
22704
22705
22706
22707
22708
22709
22710
22711
22712
22713
22714
22715
22716
22717
22718
22719
22720
22721
22722
22723
22724
22725
22726
22727
22728
22729
22730
22731
22732
22733
22734
22735
22736
22737
22738
22739
22740
22741
22742
22743
22744
22745
22746
22747
22748
22749
22750
22751
22752
22753
22754
22755
22756
22757
22758
22759
22760
22761
22762
22763
22764
22765
22766
22767
22768
22769
22770
22771
22772
22773
22774
22775
22776
22777
22778
22779
22780
22781
22782
22783
22784
22785
22786
22787
22788
22789
22790
22791
22792
22793
22794
22795
22796
22797
22798
22799
22800
22801
22802
22803
22804
22805
22806
22807
22808
22809
22810
22811
22812
22813
22814
22815
22816
22817
22818
22819
22820
22821
22822
22823
22824
22825
22826
22827
22828
22829
22830
22831
22832
22833
22834
22835
22836
22837
22838
22839
22840
22841
22842
22843
22844
22845
22846
22847
22848
22849
22850
22851
22852
22853
22854
22855
22856
22857
22858
22859
22860
22861
22862
22863
22864
22865
22866
22867
22868
22869
22870
22871
22872
22873
22874
22875
22876
22877
22878
22879
22880
22881
22882
22883
22884
22885
22886
22887
22888
22889
22890
22891
22892
22893
22894
22895
22896
22897
22898
22899
22900
22901
22902
22903
22904
22905
22906
22907
22908
22909
22910
22911
22912
22913
22914
22915
22916
22917
22918
22919
22920
22921
22922
22923
22924
22925
22926
22927
22928
22929
22930
22931
22932
22933
22934
22935
22936
22937
22938
22939
22940
22941
22942
22943
22944
22945
22946
22947
22948
22949
22950
22951
22952
22953
22954
22955
22956
22957
22958
22959
22960
22961
22962
22963
22964
22965
22966
22967
22968
22969
22970
22971
22972
22973
22974
22975
22976
22977
22978
22979
22980
22981
22982
22983
22984
22985
22986
22987
22988
22989
22990
22991
22992
22993
22994
22995
22996
22997
22998
22999
23000
23001
23002
23003
23004
23005
23006
23007
23008
23009
23010
23011
23012
23013
23014
23015
23016
23017
23018
23019
23020
23021
23022
23023
23024
23025
23026
23027
23028
23029
23030
23031
23032
23033
23034
23035
23036
23037
23038
23039
23040
23041
23042
23043
23044
23045
23046
23047
23048
23049
23050
23051
23052
23053
23054
23055
23056
23057
23058
23059
23060
23061
23062
23063
23064
23065
23066
23067
23068
23069
23070
23071
23072
23073
23074
23075
23076
23077
23078
23079
23080
23081
23082
23083
23084
23085
23086
23087
23088
23089
23090
23091
23092
23093
23094
23095
23096
23097
23098
23099
23100
23101
23102
23103
23104
23105
23106
23107
23108
23109
23110
23111
23112
23113
23114
23115
23116
23117
23118
23119
23120
23121
23122
23123
23124
23125
23126
23127
23128
23129
23130
23131
23132
23133
23134
23135
23136
23137
23138
23139
23140
23141
23142
23143
23144
23145
23146
23147
23148
23149
23150
23151
23152
23153
23154
23155
23156
23157
23158
23159
23160
23161
23162
23163
23164
23165
23166
23167
23168
23169
23170
23171
23172
23173
23174
23175
23176
23177
23178
23179
23180
23181
23182
23183
23184
23185
23186
23187
23188
23189
23190
23191
23192
23193
23194
23195
23196
23197
23198
23199
23200
23201
23202
23203
23204
23205
23206
23207
23208
23209
23210
23211
23212
23213
23214
23215
23216
23217
23218
23219
23220
23221
23222
23223
23224
23225
23226
23227
23228
23229
23230
23231
23232
23233
23234
23235
23236
23237
23238
23239
23240
23241
23242
23243
23244
23245
23246
23247
23248
23249
23250
23251
23252
23253
23254
23255
23256
23257
23258
23259
23260
23261
23262
23263
23264
23265
23266
23267
23268
23269
23270
23271
23272
23273
23274
23275
23276
23277
23278
23279
23280
23281
23282
23283
23284
23285
23286
23287
23288
23289
23290
23291
23292
23293
23294
23295
23296
23297
23298
23299
23300
23301
23302
23303
23304
23305
23306
23307
23308
23309
23310
23311
23312
23313
23314
23315
23316
23317
23318
23319
23320
23321
23322
23323
23324
23325
23326
23327
23328
23329
23330
23331
23332
23333
23334
23335
23336
23337
23338
23339
23340
23341
23342
23343
23344
23345
23346
23347
23348
23349
23350
23351
23352
23353
23354
23355
23356
23357
23358
23359
23360
23361
23362
23363
23364
23365
23366
23367
23368
23369
23370
23371
23372
23373
23374
23375
23376
23377
23378
23379
23380
23381
23382
23383
23384
23385
23386
23387
23388
23389
23390
23391
23392
23393
23394
23395
23396
23397
23398
23399
23400
23401
23402
23403
23404
23405
23406
23407
23408
23409
23410
23411
23412
23413
23414
23415
23416
23417
23418
23419
23420
23421
23422
23423
23424
23425
23426
23427
23428
23429
23430
23431
23432
23433
23434
23435
23436
23437
23438
23439
23440
23441
23442
23443
23444
23445
23446
23447
23448
23449
23450
23451
23452
23453
23454
23455
23456
23457
23458
23459
23460
23461
23462
23463
23464
23465
23466
23467
23468
23469
23470
23471
23472
23473
23474
23475
23476
23477
23478
23479
23480
23481
23482
23483
23484
23485
23486
23487
23488
23489
23490
23491
23492
23493
23494
23495
23496
23497
23498
23499
23500
23501
23502
23503
23504
23505
23506
23507
23508
23509
23510
23511
23512
23513
23514

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-html40-19980424/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<title>The Project Gutenberg eBook of History of Architecture, by Alfred D. F. Hamlin</title>
<link rel="coverpage" href="images/cover.jpg">
<style type="text/css">

body {margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;}

div.titlepage, div.maintext, div.index
{padding-top: 1em; padding-bottom: 1em;
margin-top: 3em; margin-bottom: 3em;}

hr {width: 80%; margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; text-align: center;}
hr.mid {width: 40%;}

img {margin-bottom: 1em;}
img.null {margin-bottom: 0;}

a.tag {text-decoration: none; vertical-align: .3em; font-size: 80%;
padding-left: .25em; line-height: .1em;}
a.plain {text-decoration: none;}

h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, h6 {text-align: center; font-style: normal;
font-weight: normal; line-height: 1.5; margin-top: .5em;
margin-bottom: .5em;}

h1 {font-size: 200%;}
h2 {font-size: 150%;}
div.titlepage h2 {font-size: 175%;}
h2.chapter {margin-top: 3em;}

h3 {font-size: 125%; margin-bottom: .75em;}
div.titlepage h3 {font-size: 150%; margin-top: .5em;
margin-bottom: .5em;}
h3.chapter {margin-top: 3em; margin-bottom: 1em;}
h3.subhead {font-size: 95%; margin-bottom: 1.3em; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;}
h3.subsub {font-size: 80%; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;}

h4 {font-size: 115%; margin-top: 1em;}
div.titlepage h4 {font-size: 120%; margin-top: .5em;}
h5 {font-size: 100%;}
div.endnote h5 {margin-top: 1em; font-weight: bold;}
h6 {font-size: 85%;}
div.titlepage h6 {font-size: 75%;}

p, blockquote {margin-top: .5em; margin-bottom: 0em; line-height: 1.2;}
p.space {margin-top: 1em;}

p.w90 {width: 90px;}
p.w120 {width: 120px;}
p.w150 {width: 150px;}
p.w180 {width: 180px;}
p.w210 {width: 210px;}
p.w240 {width: 240px;}
p.w270 {width: 270px;}


/* illustrations */

p.illustration {text-align: center; clear: both; margin-top: 1em;
margin-bottom: 1em; font-size: 75%; line-height: 1.6;} /* includes title */

p.illustration.float {float: right; clear: right;
margin: 1em 0 .33em 1.33em;}
p.illustration.floatleft {float: left; clear: left;
margin: 1em 1.33em .33em 0;}

p.illustration.float.null, p.illustration.floatleft.null
{margin-bottom: 0;}

p.illustration.float + p.illustration.float,
p.illustration.floatleft + p.illustration.floatleft {margin-top: 0;}

span.illustration {margin: 1em 0 .33em 1.33em; font-size: 75%;
float: right; clear: right;} /* float by default */
span.illustration.floatleft
{float: left; clear: left; margin: 1em 1.33em .33em 0;}

p.caption {text-align: left; margin: 0 1em 1em; font-size: 92%;}

p.illustration.float + p.caption {float: right; clear: right;
margin: 0 0 .5em 1em;} /* long float */
p.illustration.floatleft + p.caption {float: left; clear: left;
margin: 0 1em .5em 0;} /* long floatleft */

span.caption {margin-bottom: 1em; font-size: 125%; line-height: 1.2;}
/* font size relative to 75% in illustration */

a.closeup {margin-bottom: 1em; font-size: 133%;
line-height: 1.2; font-style: italic;}
p.closeup {float: right; clear: right; margin: 0 0 .5em 1em;
text-align: center; font-style: italic;}


p.note {margin-top: 1em; font-size: 92%;}
p.books {font-size: 92%; margin: 0 2em 1em 1em;}

div.monuments, p.monuments {margin: 1.5em 2em 0 1em; font-size: 88%;
clear: both;}
div.monuments p + p {margin-top: .3em;}

/* used in glossary */
div.hanging p {margin-left: 1em; text-indent: -1em; margin-top: 0;}
div.hanging p.space {margin-top: 1em;}

div.index p {margin-left: 1em; text-indent: -1em; margin-top: 0;
font-size: 92%;}
div.index p.first {margin-top: 1em;}
div.index.arch p.first {font-variant: small-caps;}

div.index p.inset1 {margin-left: 2em;}
div.index p.inset2 {margin-left: 3em;}
div.index p.inset3 {margin-left: 4em;}

p.hanging {margin-left: 1em; text-indent: -1em;}
p.center {text-align: center;}
p.right {text-align: right; margin-right: 2em;}
p.lefthalf {margin-right: 50%; text-align: center;}

/* footnotes */

p.footnote, div.footnote {margin: 2em; font-size: 92%;
padding-top: .5em; border-top: 1px solid #999;}


/* tables */

table {margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; margin-top: 1em;
margin-bottom: 1em;}
table.names {font-size: inherit;}

td {vertical-align: top; text-align: left; padding: .1em;}
table.names td {padding: .1em 1em .1em 0;}

tr.space td {padding-top: 1em;}

td.number {text-align: right;}

table.bracket {margin-top: 0; margin-left: 0; margin-bottom: 0;
border-collapse: collapse;}
table.bracket td {padding: 0;}

table.bracket td.bracket {vertical-align: middle;
background-repeat: no-repeat;
background-position: center left; padding-left: 1em;
background-image: url("images/bracket.jpg");}

/* two-line TOC */

table.toc {margin-top: 0;}
table.toc td {padding: .25em .5em 0 0;}
table.toc td.chapnum {text-align: center; padding-top: 1em;}
table.toc tr.space td {padding-top: 1em;}
td.chapname {font-variant: small-caps;}
td.chapname i {font-variant: normal;}

/* conditional */

table p {margin-top: 0em; margin-left: 2em; text-indent: -2em;
line-height: normal;}
table.bracket p {line-height: 1.2; margin-left: 0; text-indent: 0;}
table.names p {margin-left: 1em; text-indent: -1em;}


/* text formatting */

span.firstword {font-variant: small-caps;}

.smallroman {text-transform: lowercase; font-variant: small-caps;}

.smallcaps {font-variant: small-caps;}
.smaller {font-size: 88%;}
.extended {letter-spacing: 0.2em; padding-left: .2em;}
.sans {font-family: sans-serif;} /* by preference */

/* greek original or translit */

span.greek {border-bottom: 1px dotted #666;}

/* my additions */

/* correction popup */

ins.correction {text-decoration: none; border-bottom: thin dotted red;}

/* page number */

span.pagenum {position: absolute; right: 2%; font-size: 95%;
font-weight: normal; font-style: normal; text-align: right;
text-indent: 0em;}

/* Transcriber's Note */

.mynote {background-color: #DDE; color: #000;
font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 90%;}

div.mynote {margin: 1em 5%; padding: .5em 1em 1em;}
p.mynote {margin: 1em 5%; padding: 1em;}
div.mynote a {text-decoration: none;}

div.endnote {padding: 0 1em 1em; margin: 2em 1em;
font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 90%; border: 3px ridge #A9F;}

</style>
</head>

<body>

<div style='text-align:center; font-size:1.2em; font-weight:bold'>The Project Gutenberg eBook of A Text-Book of the History of Architecture, by Alfred D. F. Hamlin</div>
<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and
most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws of the
country where you are located before using this eBook.
</div>
<div style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Title: A Text-Book of the History of Architecture<br>
  Seventh Edition, revised</div>
<div style='display:block; margin-top:1em; margin-bottom:1em; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Author: Alfred D. F. Hamlin</div>
<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>Release Date: August 15, 2008 [eBook #26319]<br>
[Most recently updated: October 28, 2023]</div>
<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>Language: English</div>
<div style='display:block; margin-left:2em; text-indent:-2em'>Produced by: Louise Hope, Joseph R. Hauser and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team</div>
<div style='margin-top:2em; margin-bottom:4em'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE ***</div>

<div class="mynote">

<p><a name="start" id="start">This text</a> uses utf-8 (unicode)
file encoding. If the apostrophes and quotation marks in this paragraph
appear as garbage, you may have an incompatible browser or unavailable
fonts. First, make sure that your browser’s “character set” or “file
encoding” is set to Unicode (UTF-8). You may also need to change the
default font.</p>

<p><b>Technical Note:</b> The illustrations were scanned at 500dpi and
resized to 25% (125dpi). They will therefore display slightly
<i>larger</i> than their original size; the exact value depends on your
monitor settings. The Frontispiece and Figures 78 and 171 were printed
as full-page plates and resized to 1/6, so they will be a little smaller
proportionally. The quality of the photographs reflects the quality of
the printed book.</p>

<p>Errors are shown with mouse-hover <ins class="correction" title="like this">popups</ins>. Spelling variations are generally unchanged.
Details about some types of inconsistencies, including names, are given
at the <a href="#errors">end of this file</a>.</p>

</div>

<div class="titlepage">

<h3>COLLEGE HISTORIES OF ART</h3>

<h6>EDITED BY</h6>

<h5>JOHN C. VAN DYKE, L.H.D.</h5>

<hr class="mid">

<h4>HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE</h4>

<h6>A. D. F. HAMLIN</h6>

</div>


<div class="titlepage">

<h4><b>COLLEGE HISTORIES OF ART</b></h4>

<h6>EDITED BY</h6>

<h5><span class="sans">JOHN C. VAN DYKE, L.H.D.</span></h5>

<h5 class="smallcaps">Professor of the History of Art<br>
in Rutgers College</h5>

<hr class="mid">

<h5>HISTORY OF PAINTING</h5>

<p class="hanging">
By <span class="smallcaps">John C. Van Dyke</span>, the Editor of the
Series. With Frontispiece and 110 Illustrations, Bibliographies, and
Index. Crown 8vo, $1.50.</p>

<h5>HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE</h5>

<p class="hanging">
By <span class="smallcaps">Alfred D. F. Hamlin</span>, A.M. Adjunct
Professor of Architecture, Columbia College, New York. With Frontispiece
and 229 Illustrations and Diagrams, Bibliographies, Glossary, Index of
Architects, and a General Index. Crown 8vo, $2.00.</p>

<h5>HISTORY OF SCULPTURE</h5>

<p class="hanging">
By <span class="smallcaps">Allan Marquand</span>, Ph.D., L.H.D. and
<span class="smallcaps">Arthur L. Frothingham</span>, Jr., Ph.D.,
Professors of Archæology and the History of Art in Princeton University.
With Frontispiece and 112 Illustrations. Crown 8vo, $1.50.</p>

</div>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="frontis"></a>
<img src="images/frontis.jpg" width="472" height="281" alt="see caption"><br>
THE PARTHENON, ATHENS, AS RESTORED BY CH. CHIPIEZ.<br>
<span class="caption">
(From model in Metropolitan Museum, New York.)</span></p>


<div class="titlepage">

<h4>A TEXT-BOOK</h4>

<h5>&nbsp;<br>
OF THE</h5>

<h1 class="smallcaps">History of Architecture</h1>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h5>BY</h5>

<h4>A. D. F. HAMLIN, A.M.</h4>

<h6>PROFESSOR OF THE HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE<br>
IN THE SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE,<br>
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY</h6>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h5>SEVENTH EDITION</h5>

<h6>REVISED</h6>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h5><span class="extended">
LONGMANS, GREEN, AND C</span>O.<br>
<span class="smallcaps">
91 and 93 FIFTH AVENUE, NEW YORK</span><br>
<span class="smaller">
LONDON, BOMBAY, AND CALCUTTA</span><br>
1909</h5>

</div>

<h6><span class="smallcaps">Copyright, 1895, by</span><br>
LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO.</h6>

<h6><i>All rights reserved.</i></h6>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h6 class="smallcaps">
First Edition, March, 1896<br>
Printed and Revised, December, 1896.<br>
December, 1898 (Revised)<br>
October, 1900 (Revised)<br>
October, 1902 (Revised)<br>
September, 1904, June, 1906 (Revised).<br>
November, 1907 (Revised)<br>
January, 1909</h6>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h6>Press of J. J. Little &amp; Ives Co.<br>
425&ndash;435 East 24th Street, New York</h6>

<hr>

<div class="maintext">

<span class="pagenum">v</span>
<a name="pagev" id="pagev"> </a>

<h3><a name="preface">
PREFACE.</a></h3>

<p><span class="firstword">The</span> aim of this work has been to
sketch the various periods and styles of architecture with the broadest
possible strokes, and to mention, with such brief characterization as
seemed permissible or necessary, the most important works of each period
or style. Extreme condensation in presenting the leading facts of
architectural history has been necessary, and much that would rightly
claim place in a larger work has been omitted here. The danger was felt
to be rather in the direction of too much detail than of too little.
While the book is intended primarily to meet the special requirements of
the college student, those of the general reader have not been lost
sight of. The majority of the technical terms used are defined or
explained in the context, and the small remainder in a glossary at the
end of the work. Extended criticism and minute description were out of
the question, and discussion of controverted points has been in
consequence as far as possible avoided.</p>

<p>The illustrations have been carefully prepared with a view to
elucidating the text, rather than for pictorial effect. With the
exception of some fifteen cuts reproduced from Lübke’s <i>Geschichte der
Architektur</i> (by kind permission of Messrs. Seemann, of Leipzig), the
illustrations are almost all entirely new. A&nbsp;large number are from
<span class="pagenum">vi</span>
<a name="pagevi" id="pagevi"> </a>
original drawings made by myself, or under my direction, and the
remainder are, with a few exceptions, half-tone reproductions prepared
specially for this work from photographs in my possession.
Acknowledgments are due to Messrs. H.&nbsp;W. Buemming, H.&nbsp;D.
Bultman, and A.&nbsp;E. Weidinger for valued assistance in preparing
original drawings; and to Professor W.&nbsp;R. Ware, to Professor
W.&nbsp;H. Thomson, M.D., and to the Editor of the Series for much
helpful criticism and suggestion.</p>

<p>It is hoped that the lists of monuments appended to the history of
each period down to the present century may prove useful for reference,
both to the student and the general reader, as a supplement to the body
of the text.</p>

<p class="right">
<span class="smallcaps">A. D. F. Hamlin.</span></p>

<p class="lefthalf"><span class="smaller smallcaps">
Columbia College, New York,</span><br>
January 20, 1896.</p>

<p class="note">
The author desires to express his further acknowledgments to the friends
who have at various times since the first appearance of this book called
his attention to errors in the text or illustrations, and to recent
advances in the art or in its archæology deserving of mention in
subsequent editions. As far as possible these suggestions have been
incorporated in the various revisions and reprints which have appeared
since the first publication.</p>

<p class="right">
A. D. F. H.</p>

<p class="lefthalf"><span class="smaller smallcaps">
Columbia University,</span><br>
October 28, 1907.</p>


<span class="pagenum">xix</span>
<a name="pagexix" id="pagexix"> </a>
<h3 class="chapter"><a name="biblio" id="biblio">
GENERAL BIBLIOGRAPHY.</a></h3>


<p class="note">
(This includes the leading architectural works treating of more than one
period or style. The reader should consult also the special references
at the head of each chapter. Valuable material is also contained in the
leading architectural periodicals and in monographs too numerous to
mention.)</p>


<h4 class="smallcaps">Dictionaries and Encyclopedias.</h4>

<p>Agincourt, <i>History of Art by its Monuments</i>; London.</p>

<p>Architectural Publication Society, <i>Dictionary of Architecture</i>;
London.</p>

<p>Bosc, <i>Dictionnaire raisonné d’architecture</i>; Paris.</p>

<p>Durm and others, <i>Handbuch der Architektur</i>; Stuttgart. (This is
an encyclopedic compendium of architectural knowledge in many volumes;
the series not yet complete. It is referred to as the <i>Hdbuch. d.
Arch.</i>)</p>

<p>Gwilt, <i>Encyclopedia of Architecture</i>; London.</p>

<p>Longfellow and Frothingham, <i>Cyclopedia of Architecture in Italy
and the Levant</i>; New York.</p>

<p>Planat, <i>Encyclopédie d’architecture</i>; Paris.</p>

<p>Sturgis, <i>Dictionary of Architecture and Building</i>; New
York.</p>


<h4 class="smallcaps">General Handbooks and Histories.</h4>

<p>Bühlmann, <i>Die Architektur des klassischen Alterthums und der
Renaissance</i>; Stuttgart. (Also in English, published in New
York.)</p>

<p>Choisy, <i>Histoire de l’architecture</i>; Paris.</p>

<p>Durand, <i>Recueil et parallèle d’édifices de tous genres</i>;
Paris.</p>

<p>Fergusson, <i>History of Architecture in All Countries</i>;
London.</p>

<p>Fletcher and Fletcher, <i>A History of Architecture</i>; London.</p>

<span class="pagenum">xx</span>
<a name="pagexx" id="pagexx"> </a>

<p>Gailhabaud, <i>L’Architecture du Vme. au XVIIIme. siècle</i>;
Paris.&mdash;<i>Monuments anciens et modernes</i>; Paris.</p>

<p>Kugler, <i>Geschichte der Baukunst</i>; Stuttgart.</p>

<p>Longfellow, <i>The Column and the Arch</i>; New York.</p>

<p>Lübke, <i>Geschichte der Architektur</i>; Leipzig.&mdash;<i>History
of Art</i>, tr. and rev. by R. Sturgis; New York.</p>

<p>Perry, <i>Chronology of Mediæval and Renaissance Architecture</i>;
London.</p>

<p>Reynaud, <i>Traité d’architecture</i>; Paris.</p>

<p>Rosengarten, <i>Handbook of Architectural Styles</i>; London and New
York.</p>

<p>Simpson, <i>A History of Architectural Development</i>; London.</p>

<p>Spiers, <i>Architecture East and West</i>; London.</p>

<p>Stratham, <i>Architecture for General Readers</i>; London.</p>

<p>Sturgis, <i>European Architecture</i>; New York.</p>

<p><i>Transactions of the Royal Institute of British Architects</i>;
London.</p>

<p>Viollet-le-Duc, <i>Discourses on Architecture</i>; Boston.</p>


<h4 class="smallcaps">Theory, the Orders, etc.</h4>

<p>Chambers, <i>A Treatise on Civil Architecture</i>; London.</p>

<p>Daviler, <i>Cours d’architecture de Vignole</i>; Paris.</p>

<p>Esquié, <i>Traité élémentaire d’architecture</i>; Paris.</p>

<p>Guadet, <i>Théorie de l’architecture</i>; Paris.</p>

<p>Robinson, <i>Principles of Architectural Composition</i>; New
York.</p>

<p>Ruskin, <i>The Seven Lamps of Architecture</i>; London.</p>

<p>Sturgis, <i>How to Judge Architecture</i>; New York.</p>

<p>Tuckerman, <i>Vignola, the Five Orders of Architecture</i>; New
York.</p>

<p>Van Brunt, <i>Greek Lines and Other Essays</i>; Boston.</p>

<p>Van Pelt, <i>A Discussion of Composition</i>.</p>

<p>Ware, <i>The American Vignola</i>; Scranton.</p>




<span class="pagenum">xxi</span>
<a name="pagexxi" id="pagexxi"> </a>

<h2 class="chapter">HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE.</h2>

<hr class="mid">

<h3><a name="intro" id="intro">
INTRODUCTION.</a></h3>


<p><span class="firstword">A history</span> of architecture is a
record of man’s efforts to build beautifully. The erection of structures
devoid of beauty is mere building, a&nbsp;trade and not an art. Edifices
in which strength and stability alone are sought, and in designing which
only utilitarian considerations have been followed, are properly works
of engineering. Only when the idea of beauty is added to that of use
does a structure take its place among works of architecture. We may,
then, define architecture as the art which seeks to harmonize in a
building the requirements of utility and of beauty. It is the most
useful of the fine arts and the noblest of the useful arts. It touches
the life of man at every point. It is concerned not only in sheltering
his person and ministering to his comfort, but also in providing him
with places for worship, amusement, and business; with tombs, memorials,
embellishments for his cities, and other structures for the varied needs
of a complex civilization. It engages the services of a larger portion
of the community and involves greater outlays of money than any other
occupation except agriculture. Everyone at some point comes in contact
with the work of the architect, and from this universal contact
architecture derives its significance as an index of the civilization of
an age, a&nbsp;race, or a people.</p>

<span class="pagenum">xxii</span>
<a name="pagexxii" id="pagexxii"> </a>
<p>It is the function of the historian of architecture to trace the
origin, growth, and decline of the architectural styles which have
prevailed in different lands and ages, and to show how they have
reflected the great movements of civilization. The migrations, the
conquests, the commercial, social, and religious changes among different
peoples have all manifested themselves in the changes of their
architecture, and it is the historian’s function to show this. It is
also his function to explain the principles of the styles, their
characteristic forms and decoration, and to describe the great
masterpieces of each style and period.</p>

<p><b>STYLE</b> is a quality; the “historic styles” are phases of
development. <i>Style</i> is character expressive of definite
conceptions, as of grandeur, gaiety, or solemnity. An <i>historic
style</i> is the particular phase, the characteristic manner of design,
which prevails at a given time and place. It is not the result of mere
accident or caprice, but of intellectual, moral, social, religious, and
even political conditions. Gothic architecture could never have been
invented by the Greeks, nor could the Egyptian styles have grown up in
Italy. Each style is based upon some fundamental principle springing
from its surrounding civilization, which undergoes successive
developments until it either reaches perfection or its possibilities are
exhausted, after which a period of decline usually sets in. This is
followed either by a reaction and the introduction of some radically new
principle leading to the evolution of a new style, or by the final decay
and extinction of the civilization and its replacement by some younger
and more virile element. Thus the history of architecture appears as a
connected chain of causes and effects succeeding each other without
break, each style growing out of that which preceded it, or springing
out of the fecundating contact of a higher with a lower civilization. To
study architectural styles is therefore to study a branch of the history
of civilization.</p>

<span class="pagenum">xxiii</span>
<a name="pagexxiii"> </a>
<p>Technically, architectural styles are identified by the means they
employ to cover enclosed spaces, by the characteristic forms of the
supports and other members (piers, <!-- invisible comma --> columns,
arches, mouldings, traceries, etc.), and by their decoration. The
<b>plan</b> should receive special attention, since it shows the
arrangement of the points of support, and hence the nature of the
structural design. A&nbsp;comparison, for example, of the plans of the
Hypostyle Hall at Karnak (<a href="#fig11">Fig.
11,&nbsp;<i>h</i></a>) and of the Basilica of Constantine (<a href="#fig58">Fig.&nbsp;58</a>) shows at once a radical
difference in constructive principle between the two edifices, and hence
a difference of style.</p>

<p><b>STRUCTURAL PRINCIPLES.</b> All architecture is based on one or
more of three fundamental structural principles; that of the
<i>lintel</i>, of the <i>arch</i> or <i>vault</i>, and of the
<i>truss</i>. The principle of the <b>lintel</b> is that of resistance
to transverse strains, and appears in all construction in which a
cross-piece or beam rests on two or more vertical supports. The
<b>arch</b> or <b>vault</b> makes use of several pieces to span an
opening between two supports. These pieces are in compression and exert
lateral pressures or <i>thrusts</i> which are transmitted to the
supports or abutments. The thrust must be resisted either by the
massiveness of the abutments or by the opposition to it of
counter-thrusts from other arches or vaults. Roman builders used the
first, Gothic builders the second of these means of resistance. The
<b>truss</b> is a framework so composed of several pieces of wood or
metal that each shall best resist the particular strain, whether of
tension or compression, to which it is subjected, the whole forming a
compound beam or arch. It is especially applicable to very wide spans,
and is the most characteristic feature of modern construction. How the
adoption of one or another of these principles affected the forms and
even the decoration of the various styles, will be shown in the
succeeding chapters.</p>

<p><b>HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT.</b> Geographically and chronologically,
architecture appears to have originated in the Nile
<span class="pagenum">xxiv</span>
<a name="pagexxiv" id="pagexxiv"> </a>
valley. A&nbsp;second centre of development is found in the valley of
the Tigris and Euphrates, not uninfluenced by the older Egyptian art.
Through various channels the Greeks inherited from both Egyptian and
Assyrian art, the two influences being discernible even through the
strongly original aspect of Greek architecture. The Romans in turn,
adopting the external details of Greek architecture, transformed its
substance by substituting the Etruscan arch for the Greek construction
of columns and lintels. They developed a complete and original system of
construction and decoration and spread it over the civilized world,
which has never wholly outgrown or abandoned&nbsp;it.</p>

<p>With the fall of Rome and the rise of Constantinople these forms
underwent in the East another transformation, called the Byzantine, in
the development of Christian domical church architecture. In the North
and West, meanwhile, under the growing institutions of the papacy and of
the monastic orders and the emergence of a feudal civilization out of
the chaos of the Dark Ages, the constant preoccupation of architecture
was to evolve from the basilica type of church a vaulted structure, and
to adorn it throughout with an appropriate dress of constructive and
symbolic ornament. Gothic architecture was the outcome of this
preoccupation, and it prevailed throughout northern and western Europe
until nearly or quite the close of the fifteenth century.</p>

<p>During this fifteenth century the Renaissance style matured in Italy,
where it speedily triumphed over Gothic fashions and produced a
marvellous series of civic monuments, palaces, and churches, adorned
with forms borrowed or imitated from classic Roman art. This influence
spread through Europe in the sixteenth century, and ran a course of two
centuries, after which a period of servile classicism was followed by a
rapid decline in taste. To this succeeded the eclecticism and confusion
of the nineteenth century, to
<span class="pagenum">xxv</span>
<a name="pagexxv" id="pagexxv"> </a>
which the rapid growth of new requirements and development of new
resources have largely contributed.</p>

<p>In Eastern lands three great schools of architecture have grown up
contemporaneously with the above phases of Western art; one under the
influence of Mohammedan civilization, another in the Brahman and
Buddhist architecture of India, and the third in China and Japan. The
first of these is the richest and most important. Primarily inspired
from Byzantine art, always stronger on the decorative than on the
constructive side, it has given to the world the mosques and palaces of
Northern Africa, Moorish Spain, Persia, Turkey, and India. The other two
schools seem to be wholly unrelated to the first, and have no affinity
with the architecture of Western lands.</p>

<p>Of Mexican, Central American, and South American architecture so
little is known, and that little is so remote in history and spirit from
the styles above enumerated, that it belongs rather to archæology than
to architectural history, and will not be considered in this work.</p>


<p class="note">
<span class="smallcaps">Note.</span>&mdash;The reader’s attention is
called to the <a href="#appendix">Appendix</a> to
this volume, in which are gathered some of the results of recent
investigations and of the architectural progress of the last few years
which could not readily be introduced into the text of this edition. The
General Bibliography and the lists of books recommended have been
revised and brought up to date.</p>

</div> <!-- end div maintext -->

<hr class="mid">

<hr>

<hr class="mid">

<div class="titlepage">

<h4><a name="ads" id="ads">
<b>College Histories of Art.</b></a></h4>

<h2><b>A HISTORY OF PAINTING.</b></h2>

<h6>BY</h6>

<h5>JOHN C. VAN DYKE, L.H.D.</h5>

<p class="center smaller">
Professor of the History of Art in Rutgers College, and Author of
“Principles of Art,” “Art for Art’s Sake,” etc.</p>

<p><b>With Frontispiece and 110 Illustrations in the text, reproduced in
half-tone from the most celebrated paintings. Crown 8vo, 307 pages,
$1.50.</b></p>

<hr class="mid">

<p>“... The initial volume of a promising series ... seems a model of
pith, lucidity, and practical convenience; and that it is sound and
accurate the author’s name is a sufficient guarantee. Essential
historical and biographical facts, together with brief critical
estimates and characterizations of leading schools and painters, are
given in a few well-chosen words; and for students who wish to pursue
the subject in detail, a&nbsp;list of selected authorities at the head
of each chapter points the way. Serviceable lists are also provided of
principal extant works, together with the places where they are to be
found. The text is liberally sprinkled with illustrations in
half-tone.”&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Dial, Chicago</span>.</p>

<p>“Prof. Van Dyke has performed his task with great thoroughness and
good success.... He seems to us singularly happy in his characterization
of various artists, and amazingly just in proportion. We have hardly
found an instance in which the relative importance accorded a given
artist seemed to us manifestly wrong, and hardly one in which the
special characteristics of a style were not adequately presented.”<!--
invisible . -->&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Nation, N.Y.</span></p>

<p>“... Gives a good general view of the subject, avoiding as a rule all
elaborate theories and disputed points, and aiming to distinguish the
various historical schools from one another by their differences of
subject and technique ... we do not know of anybody who has, on the
whole, accomplished the task with as much success as has Mr. Van Dyke.
The book is modern in spirit and thoroughly up-to-date in point of
information.”&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Art Amateur</span>.</p>

<p>“Professor Van Dyke has made a radical departure in one respect, in
purposely omitting the biographical details with which text-books on art
are usually encumbered, and substituting short critical estimates of
artists and of their rank among the painters of their time. This feature
of the work is highly to be commended, as it affords means for
comparative study that cannot fail to be beneficial.... Altogether
Professor Van Dyke’s text-book is worthy of general adoption, and as a
volume of ready reference for the family library it will have a distinct
usefulness. It is compact, comprehensive, and admirably
arranged.”&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Beacon, Boston</span>.</p>

<hr class="mid">

<h4><b>LONGMANS, GREEN, &amp; CO.,</b></h4>

<h5><b>91 &amp; 93 Fifth Avenue, NEW YORK.</b></h5>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<hr>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<h2><b>A History of Sculpture.</b></h2>

<h5>BY</h5>

<h5><b>ALLAN MARQUAND, Ph.D., L.H.D.</b></h5>

<h6>AND</h6>

<h5><b>ARTHUR L. FROTHINGHAM, Jr., Ph.D.</b></h5>

<p class="center smaller">
Professors of Archæology and the History of Art in Princeton
University.</p>

<p><b>With Frontispiece and 113 Illustrations in half-tone in the text,
Bibliographies, Addresses for Photographs and Casts, etc.<!-- invisible
.--> Crown 8vo, 313 pages, $1.50.</b></p>

<hr class="mid">

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Henry W. Kent</span>, <i>Curator of the Seater
Museum, Watkins, N.Y.</i></p>

<p>“Like the other works in this series of yours, it is simply
invaluable, filling a long-felt want. The bibliographies and lists will
be keenly appreciated by all who work with a class of students.”</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Charles H. Moore</span>, <i>Harvard
University</i>.</p>

<p>“The illustrations are especially good, avoiding the excessively
black background which produce harsh contrasts and injure the outlines
of so many half-tone prints.”</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">J. M. Hoppin</span>, <i>Yale
University</i>.</p>

<p>“These names are sufficient guarantee for the excellence of the book
and its fitness for the object it was designed for. I&nbsp;was
especially interested in the chapter on <i>Renaissance Sculpture in
Italy</i>.”</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Critic</span>, <i>New York</i>.</p>

<p>“This history is a model of condensation.... Each period is treated
in full, with descriptions of its general characteristics and its
individual developments under various conditions, physical, political,
religious and the like.... A&nbsp;general history of sculpture has never
before been written in English&mdash;never in any language in convenient
textbook form. This publication, then, should meet with an enthusiastic
reception among students and amateurs of art, not so much, however,
because it is the only book of its kind, as for its intrinsic merit and
attractive form.”</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Outlook</span>, <i>New York</i>.</p>

<p>“A concise survey of the history of sculpture is something needed
everywhere.... A&nbsp;good feature of this book&mdash;and one which
should be imitated&mdash;is the list indicating where casts and
photographs may best be obtained. Of course such a volume is amply
indexed.”</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Notre Dame Scholastic</span>, <i>Notre Dame,
Ind.</i></p>

<p>“The work is orderly, the style lucid and easy. The illustrations,
numbering over a hundred, are sharply cut and well selected. Besides a
general bibliography, there is placed at the end of each period of style
a special list to which the student may refer, should he wish to pursue
more fully any particular school.”</p>

<hr class="mid">

<h4><b>LONGMANS, GREEN, &amp; CO., Publishers,</b></h4>

<h5><b>91 &amp; 93 Fifth Avenue, NEW YORK.</b></h5>

</div> <!-- end div titlepage again -->

<span class="pagenum">vii</span>
<a name="pagevii" id="pagevii"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter"><a name="contents">
TABLE OF CONTENTS.</a></h3>

<table class="toc" summary="contents">
<tr>
<td></td>
<td class="number smallroman">
PAGE</td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapname">
<p><a href="#preface">Preface</a></p></td>
<td></td>
</tr>

<tr class="space">
<td class="chapname">
List of Illustrations (<i>Figures 1&ndash;157</i>)</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#illus">xi</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER I.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Primitive and Prehistoric Architecture</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapI">1</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER II.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Egyptian Architecture</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapII">6</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER III.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Egyptian Architecture, <i>Continued</i></td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapIII">16</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER IV.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Chaldæan and Assyrian Architecture</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapIV">28</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER V.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Persian, Lycian, and Jewish Architecture</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapV">35</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER VI.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Greek Architecture</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapVI">43</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
<span class="pagenum">viii</span>
<a name="pageviii" id="pageviii"> </a>
CHAPTER VII.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Greek Architecture, <i>Continued</i></td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapVII">60</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER VIII.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Roman Architecture</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapVIII">74</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER IX.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Roman Architecture, <i>Continued</i></td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapIX">88</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER X.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Early Christian Architecture</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapX">110</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XI.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Byzantine Architecture</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXI">120</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XII.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
<p>Sassanian and Mohammedan Architecture&mdash;Arabian, Moresque,
Persian, Indian, and Turkish</p></td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXII">135</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XIII.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
<p>Early Mediæval Architecture in Italy and France</p></td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXIII">155</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XIV.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
<p>Early Mediæval Architecture in Germany, Great Britain, and
Spain</p></td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXIV">172</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XV.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Gothic Architecture</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXV">182</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XVI.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Gothic Architecture in France</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXVI">196</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
<span class="pagenum">ix</span>
<a name="pageix" id="pageix"> </a>
CHAPTER XVII.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Gothic Architecture in Great Britain</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXVII">218</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XVIII.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
<p>Gothic Architecture in Germany, the Netherlands, and Spain</p></td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXVIII">237</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XIX.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Gothic Architecture in Italy</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXIX">254</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XX.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Early Renaissance Architecture in Italy</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXX">270</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XXI.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
<p>Renaissance Architecture in Italy&mdash;The Advanced Renaissance and
Decline</p></td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXXI">288</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XXII.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Renaissance Architecture in France</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXXII">308</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XXIII.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
<p>Renaissance Architecture in Great Britain and the
Netherlands</p></td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXXIII">326</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XXIV.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
<p>Renaissance Architecture in Germany, Spain, and Portugal</p></td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXXIV">338</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XXV.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
The Classic Revivals in Europe</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXXV">354</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
<span class="pagenum">x</span>
<a name="pagex" id="pagex"> </a>
CHAPTER XXVI.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Recent Architecture in Europe</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXXVI">368</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XXVII.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Architecture in the United States</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXXVII">383</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapnum" colspan="2">
CHAPTER XXVIII.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="chapname">
<p>Oriental Architecture&mdash;India, China, and Japan</p></td>
<td class="number"><a href="#chapXXVIII">401</a></td>
</tr>

<tr class="space">
<td class="chapname">
Appendix</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#appendix">417</a></td>
</tr>

<tr class="space">
<td class="chapname">
Glossary</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#glossary">429</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Index of Architects</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#index_arch">431</a></td>
</tr>

<tr>
<td class="chapname">
Index</td>
<td class="number"><a href="#index">435</a></td>
</tr>
</table>

<span class="pagenum">xi</span>
<a name="pagexi" id="pagexi"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter"><a name="illus" id="illus">
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS.</a></h3>

<div class="mynote">
<p>A few illustrations include links to larger versions. Figure 24 has
been reformatted for this e-text; it was printed vertically, with the
Plan below the Section. Figure 138 is shown as printed.</p>
</div>

<p class="note">
<span class="firstword">The</span> authorship of the original drawings
is indicated by the initials affixed: A.&nbsp;= drawings by the author;
B.&nbsp;= H.&nbsp;W. Buemming; Bn.&nbsp;= H.&nbsp;D. Bultman; Ch.&nbsp;=
Château, <i>L’Architecture en France</i>; G.&nbsp;= drawings adapted
from Gwilt’s <i>Encyclopædia of Architecture</i>; L.&nbsp;= Lübke’s
<i>Geschichte der Architektur</i>; W.&nbsp;= A.&nbsp;E. Weidinger. All
other illustrations are from photographs.</p>

<table class="toc" summary="illustrations">
<tr>
<td></td>
<td class="number smallroman" colspan="2">
PAGE</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2">
<p><a href="#frontis">
<span class="smallcaps">Frontispiece.</span></a>
The Parthenon Restored (from model in Metropolitan Museum, New York)</p>
</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig1">1</a></td>
<td><p>Section of Great Pyramid (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig2">2</a></td>
<td><p>Section of King’s Chamber (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig3">3</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Sphinx Temple (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig4">4</a></td>
<td><p>Ruins of Sphinx Temple (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig5">5</a></td>
<td><p>Tomb at Abydos (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig6">6</a></td>
<td><p>Tomb at Beni-Hassan (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig7">7</a></td>
<td><p>Section and Half-plan of same (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig8">8</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of the Ramesseum (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig9">9</a></td>
<td><p>Temple of Edfou. Plan (B.)</p></td>
<td class="number">17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig10">10</a></td>
<td><p>Temple of Edfou. Section (B.)</p></td>
<td class="number">17</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig11">11</a></td>
<td><p>Temple of Karnak. Plan (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig12">12</a></td>
<td><p>Central Portion of Hypostyle Hall at Karnak (from model in
Metropolitan Museum, New York)</p></td>
<td class="number">20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig13">13</a></td>
<td><p>Great Temple of Ipsamboul</p></td>
<td class="number">21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig14">14</a></td>
<td><p>Edfou. Front of Hypostyle Hall</p></td>
<td class="number">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig15">15</a></td>
<td><p>Osirid Pier (Medinet Abou) (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig16">16</a></td>
<td><p>Types of Column (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig17">17</a></td>
<td><p>Egyptian Floral Ornament-Forms (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig18">18</a></td>
<td><p>Palace of Sargon at Khorsabad. Plan (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig19">19</a></td>
<td><p>Gate, Khorsabad (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig20">20</a></td>
<td><p>Assyrian Ornament (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig21">21</a></td>
<td><p>Column from Persepolis (B.)</p></td>
<td class="number">37</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig22">22</a></td>
<td><p>Lion Gate at Mycenæ (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number">
<span class="pagenum">xii</span>
<a name="pagexii" id="pagexii"> </a>
<a href="#fig23">23</a></td>
<td><p>Polygonal Masonry, Mycenæ (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">45</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig24">24</a></td>
<td><p>Tholos of Atreus; Plan and Section (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig25">25</a></td>
<td><p>Tholos of Atreus, Doorway (after Clarke) (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig26">26</a></td>
<td><p>Greek Doric Order (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">48</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig27">27</a></td>
<td><p>Doric Order of the Parthenon. (From cast in Metropolitan Museum,
New York)</p></td>
<td class="number">49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig28">28</a></td>
<td><p>Greek Ionic Order, Miletus (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig29">29</a></td>
<td><p>Side View of Ionic Capital (B.)</p></td>
<td class="number">52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig30">30</a></td>
<td><p>Greek Corinthian Order (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig31">31</a></td>
<td><p>Types of Greek Temple Plans (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">54</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig32">32</a></td>
<td><p>Carved Anthemion Ornament, Athens</p></td>
<td class="number">57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig33">33</a></td>
<td><p>Temple of Zeus, Agrigentum; Plan (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">61</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig34">34</a></td>
<td><p>Ruins of the Parthenon</p></td>
<td class="number">63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig35">35</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of the Erechtheum (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">64</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig36">36</a></td>
<td><p>West End of the Erechtheum (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">64</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig37">37</a></td>
<td><p>Propylæa at Athens. Plan (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">65</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig38">38</a></td>
<td><p>Choragic Monument of Lysicrates. (From model in Metropolitan
Museum, New York)</p></td>
<td class="number">67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig39">39</a></td>
<td><p>Temple of Olympian Zeus, Athens. Plan (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">68</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig40">40</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Greek Theatre (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig41">41</a></td>
<td><p>Mausoleum at Halicarnassus (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">72</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig42">42</a></td>
<td><p>Roman Doric Order from Theatre of Marcellus. (Model in
Metropolitan Museum, New York)</p></td>
<td class="number">77</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig43">43</a></td>
<td><p>Roman Ionic Order (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig44">44</a></td>
<td><p>Roman Corinthian Order. (From model in Metropolitan Museum, New
York)</p></td>
<td class="number">79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig45">45</a></td>
<td><p>Roman Arcade with Engaged Columns (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig46">46</a></td>
<td><p>Barrel Vault (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig47">47</a></td>
<td><p>Groined Vault (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">81</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig48">48</a></td>
<td><p>Roman Wall Masonry (B.)</p></td>
<td class="number">83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig49">49</a></td>
<td><p>Roman Carved Ornament. (Lateran Museum)</p></td>
<td class="number">85</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig50">50</a></td>
<td><p>Roman Ceiling Panels (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig51">51</a></td>
<td><p>Temple of Fortuna Virilis. Plan</p></td>
<td class="number">89</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig52">52</a></td>
<td><p>Circular Temple, Tivoli (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">90</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig53">53</a></td>
<td><p>Temple of Venus and Rome. Plan (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">93</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig54">54</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of the Pantheon (B.)</p></td>
<td class="number">94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig55">55</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of the Pantheon</p></td>
<td class="number">95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig56">56</a></td>
<td><p>Exterior of the Pantheon. (Model in Metropolitan Museum, New
York)</p></td>
<td class="number">96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig57">57</a></td>
<td><p>Forum and Basilica of Trajan (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number">
<span class="pagenum">xiii</span>
<a name="pagexiii" id="pagexiii"> </a>
<a href="#fig58">58</a></td>
<td><p>Basilica of Constantine. Plan (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">98</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig59">59</a></td>
<td><p>Ruins of Basilica of Constantine</p></td>
<td class="number">99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig60">60</a></td>
<td><p>Central Block, Thermæ of Caracalla. Plan (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig61">61</a></td>
<td><p>Roman Theatre, Herculanum</p></td>
<td class="number">101</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig62">62</a></td>
<td><p>Colosseum at Rome. Half Plan (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">102</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig63">63</a></td>
<td><p>Arch of Constantine. (Model in Metropolitan Museum, New
York)</p></td>
<td class="number">104</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig64">64</a></td>
<td><p>Palace of Diocletian, Spalato. Plan (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">106</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig65">65</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of House of Pansa, Pompeii (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">107</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig66">66</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Santa Costanza, Rome (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">111</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig67">67</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of the Basilica of St. Paul-beyond-the-Walls, Rome
(A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig68">68</a></td>
<td><p>St. Paul-beyond-the-Walls. Interior</p></td>
<td class="number">114</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig69">69</a></td>
<td><p>Church at Kalb Louzeh (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">116</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig70">70</a></td>
<td><p>Cathedral at Bozrah. Plan (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">117</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig71">71</a></td>
<td><p>Diagram of Pendentives (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig72">72</a></td>
<td><p>Spandril, Hagia Sophia</p></td>
<td class="number">125</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig73">73</a></td>
<td><p>Capital with Impost Block, S. Vitale</p></td>
<td class="number">126</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig74">74</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of St. Sergius, Constantinople (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">127</td>
</tr>
<!-- 8th edn. add Plan of San Vitale, Ravenna (S.) -->

<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig75">75</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Hagia Sophia, Constantinople (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig76">76</a></td>
<td><p>Section of Hagia Sophia (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig77">77</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of Hagia Sophia (full page)</p></td>
<td class="number">129</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig78">78</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of St. Mark’s, Venice (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">132</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig79">79</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of St. Mark’s</p></td>
<td class="number">133</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig80">80</a></td>
<td><p>Mosque of Sultan Hassan, Cairo. Sanctuary</p></td>
<td class="number">137</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig81">81</a></td>
<td><p>Mosque of Kaîd Bey, Cairo</p></td>
<td class="number">139</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig82">82</a></td>
<td><p>Moorish Detail, Alhambra</p></td>
<td class="number">141</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig83">83</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of Great Mosque, Cordova</p></td>
<td class="number">142</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig84">84</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of the Alhambra (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">144</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig85">85</a></td>
<td><p>Tomb of Mahmûd, <!-- missing accent--> Bijapur. Section
(A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">147</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig86">86</a></td>
<td><p>The Taj Mahal, Agra</p></td>
<td class="number">149</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig87">87</a></td>
<td><p>Mosque of Mehmet II., Constantinople. Plan (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">151</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig88">88</a></td>
<td><p>Exterior of Ahmediyeh Mosque, Constantinople</p></td>
<td class="number">152</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig89">89</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of Suleimaniyeh Mosque, Constantinople</p></td>
<td class="number">153</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig90">90</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of San Ambrogio, Milan</p></td>
<td class="number">157</td>
</tr>

<!-- 8th edn. add Plan of San Michele, Pavia (A.) -->

<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig91">91</a></td>
<td><p>West Front and Campanile, Cathedral of Piacenza</p></td>
<td class="number">158</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig92">92</a></td>
<td><p>Baptistery, Cathedral, and Leaning Tower, Pisa</p></td>
<td class="number">160</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig93">93</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of Pisa Cathedral</p></td>
<td class="number">161</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig94">94</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of St. Front, Perigueux (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">164</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig95">95</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of St. Front (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">165</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig96">96</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Notre Dame du Port, Clermont (Ch.)</p></td>
<td class="number">166</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number">
<span class="pagenum">xiv</span>
<a name="pagexiv" id="pagexiv"> </a>
<a href="#fig97">97</a></td>
<td><p>Section of same (Ch.)</p></td>
<td class="number">166</td>
</tr>

<!-- 8th edn. add Plan of St. Sernin, Toulouse (A.) -->

<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig98">98</a></td>
<td><p>A Six-part Ribbed Vault (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">167</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig99">99</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Minster at Worms (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">173</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig100">100</a></td>
<td><p>One Bay, Cathedral of Spires (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">174</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig101">101</a></td>
<td><p>East End, Church of the Apostles, Cologne</p></td>
<td class="number">175</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig102">102</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Durham Cathedral (Bn.)</p></td>
<td class="number">177</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig103">103</a></td>
<td><p>One Bay, Transept of Winchester Cathedral (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">178</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig104">104</a></td>
<td><p>Front of Iffley Church (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">179</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig105">105</a></td>
<td><p>Constructive System of Gothic Church (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">183</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig106">106</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Sainte Chapelle, Paris (Bn.)</p></td>
<td class="number">184</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig107">107</a></td>
<td><p>Early Gothic Flying Buttress (Bn.)</p></td>
<td class="number">185</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig108">108</a></td>
<td><p>Ribbed Vault, English Type (Bn. after Babcock)</p></td>
<td class="number">186</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig109">109</a></td>
<td><p>Penetrations and Intersections of Vaults (Bn.)</p></td>
<td class="number">187</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig110">110</a></td>
<td><p>Plate Tracery, Charlton-on-Oxmore</p></td>
<td class="number">188</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig111">111</a></td>
<td><p>Bar Tracery, St. Michael’s, Warfield (W.)</p></td>
<td class="number">189</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig112">112</a></td>
<td><p>Rose Window from St. Ouen, Rouen (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">190</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig113">113</a></td>
<td><p>Flamboyant Detail, Strasburg</p></td>
<td class="number">191</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig114">114</a></td>
<td><p>Early Gothic Carving (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">192</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig115">115</a></td>
<td><p>Carving, Decorated Period, from Southwell Minster</p></td>
<td class="number">193</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig116">116</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Notre Dame, Paris (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">198</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig117">117</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of Notre Dame</p></td>
<td class="number">199</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig118">118</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of Le Mans Cathedral</p></td>
<td class="number">200</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig119">119</a></td>
<td><p>Vaulting with Zigzag Ridge Joints (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">201</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig120">120</a></td>
<td><p>One Bay, Abbey of St. Denis (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">203</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig121">121</a></td>
<td><p>The Sainte Chapelle, Paris. Exterior</p></td>
<td class="number">204</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig122">122</a></td>
<td><p>Amiens Cathedral; Plan (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">205</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig123">123</a></td>
<td><p>Alby Cathedral. Plan (A. after Lübke)</p></td>
<td class="number">206</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig124">124</a></td>
<td><p>West Front of Notre Dame, Paris</p></td>
<td class="number">207</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig125">125</a></td>
<td><p>West Front of St. Maclou, Rouen</p></td>
<td class="number">208</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig126">126</a></td>
<td><p>French Gothic Capitals (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">210</td>
</tr>

<!-- 8th edn. add Openwork Gable, Rouen Cathedral -->
<!-- 8th edn. add North Porch, Chartres Cathedral -->

<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig127">127</a></td>
<td><p>House of Jacques Cœur, Bourges (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">215</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig128">128</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Salisbury Cathedral (Bn.)</p></td>
<td class="number">219</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig129">129</a></td>
<td><p>Ribbed Vaulting, Choir of Exeter Cathedral</p></td>
<td class="number">221</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig130">130</a></td>
<td><p>Lierne Vaulting, Tewkesbury Abbey</p></td>
<td class="number">222</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig131">131</a></td>
<td><p>Vault of Chapter House, Wells</p></td>
<td class="number">223</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig132">132</a></td>
<td><p>Cloisters of Salisbury Cathedral</p></td>
<td class="number">225</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig133">133</a></td>
<td><p>Perpendicular Tracery, St. George’s, Windsor</p></td>
<td class="number">226</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig134">134</a></td>
<td><p>West Front, Lichfield Cathedral</p></td>
<td class="number">228</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig135">135</a></td>
<td><p>One Bay of Choir, Lichfield Cathedral (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">229</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig136">136</a></td>
<td><p>Fan Vaulting, Henry VII.’s Chapel</p></td>
<td class="number">231</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number">
<span class="pagenum">xv</span>
<a name="pagexv" id="pagexv"> </a>
<a href="#fig137">137</a></td>
<td><p>Eastern Part, Westminster Abbey. Plan (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">232</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig138">138</a></td>
<td><p>Roof of Nave, St. Mary’s, Westonzoyland (W.)</p></td>
<td class="number">233</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig139">139</a></td>
<td><p>One Bay, Cathedral of St. George, Limburg (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">239</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig140">140</a></td>
<td><p>Section of St. Elizabeth, Marburg (Bn.)</p></td>
<td class="number">240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig141">141</a></td>
<td><p>Cologne Cathedral, Plan (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">242</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig142">142</a></td>
<td><p>Church of Our Lady, Treves (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">243</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig143">143</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Ulm Cathedral (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">244</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig144">144</a></td>
<td><p>Town Hall, Louvain</p></td>
<td class="number">247</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig145">145</a></td>
<td><p>Façade of Burgos Cathedral</p></td>
<td class="number">249</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig146">146</a></td>
<td><p>Detail from S. Gregorio, Valladolid</p></td>
<td class="number">251</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig147">147</a></td>
<td><p>Duomo at Florence, Plan (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">256</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig148">148</a></td>
<td><p>Duomo at Florence, Nave</p></td>
<td class="number">257</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig149">149</a></td>
<td><p>One Bay, Cathedral of S. Martino, Lucca (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">258</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig150">150</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of Sienna Cathedral</p></td>
<td class="number">259</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig151">151</a></td>
<td><p>Façade of Sienna Cathedral</p></td>
<td class="number">261</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig152">152</a></td>
<td><p>Exterior of the Certosa, Pavia</p></td>
<td class="number">262</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig153">153</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of the Certosa, Pavia</p></td>
<td class="number">263</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig154">154</a></td>
<td><p>Upper Part of Campanile, Florence</p></td>
<td class="number">265</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig155">155</a></td>
<td><p>Upper Part of Palazzo Vecchio, Florence</p></td>
<td class="number">266</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig156">156</a></td>
<td><p>Loggia dei Lanzi, Florence</p></td>
<td class="number">267</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig157">157</a></td>
<td><p>West Front of Doge’s Palace, Venice</p></td>
<td class="number">268</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig158">158</a></td>
<td><p>Capital, Palazzo Zorzi, Venice</p></td>
<td class="number">275</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig159">159</a></td>
<td><p>Section of Dome, Duomo of Florence (Bn.)</p></td>
<td class="number">276</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig160">160</a></td>
<td><p>Exterior of Dome, Duomo of Florence</p></td>
<td class="number">277</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig161">161</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of S. Spirito, Florence</p></td>
<td class="number">278</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig162">162</a></td>
<td><p>Court of Riccardi Palace, Florence</p></td>
<td class="number">279</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig163">163</a></td>
<td><p>Façade of Strozzi Palace, Florence</p></td>
<td class="number">280</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig164">164</a></td>
<td><p>Tomb of Pietro di Noceto, Lucca</p></td>
<td class="number">282</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig165">165</a></td>
<td><p>Vendramini Palace, Venice</p></td>
<td class="number">285</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig166">166</a></td>
<td><p>Façade of Giraud Palace, Rome (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">290</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig167">167</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Farnese Palace, Rome (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">292</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig168">168</a></td>
<td><p>Court of Farnese Palace, Rome</p></td>
<td class="number">293</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig169">169</a></td>
<td><p>Bramante’s Plan for St. Peter’s, Rome (L.)</p></td>
<td class="number">294</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig170">170</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of St. Peter’s, Rome, as now standing (Bn. after
G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">295</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig171">171</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of St. Peter’s (full page)</p></td>
<td class="number">297</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig172">172</a></td>
<td><p>Library of St. Mark, Venice</p></td>
<td class="number">301</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig173">173</a></td>
<td><p>Interior of San Severo, Naples</p></td>
<td class="number">302</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig174">174</a></td>
<td><p>Church of Santa Maria della Salute, Naples</p></td>
<td class="number">303</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig175">175</a></td>
<td><p>Court Façade, East Wing of Blois</p></td>
<td class="number">311</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig176">176</a></td>
<td><p>Staircase Tower, Blois</p></td>
<td class="number">313</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number">
<span class="pagenum">xvi</span>
<a name="pagexvi" id="pagexvi"> </a>
<a href="#fig177">177</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Château of Chambord (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">314</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig178">178</a></td>
<td><p>Upper Part of Château of Chambord</p></td>
<td class="number">314</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig179">179</a></td>
<td><p>Detail of Court of Louvre, southwest portion</p></td>
<td class="number">315</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig180">180</a></td>
<td><p>The Luxemburg Palace, Paris</p></td>
<td class="number">318</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig181">181</a></td>
<td><p>Colonnade of the Louvre</p></td>
<td class="number">321</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig182">182</a></td>
<td><p>Dome of the Invalides, Paris</p></td>
<td class="number">322</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig183">183</a></td>
<td><p>Façade of St. Sulpice, Paris</p></td>
<td class="number">323</td>
</tr>

<!-- 8th edn. MOVED FROM BELOW Plan of Panthéon, Paris (G.) -->
<!-- 8th edn. MOVED FROM BELOW Exterior of Panthéon, Paris -->

<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig184">184</a></td>
<td><p>Burghley House</p></td>
<td class="number">327</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig185">185</a></td>
<td><p>Whitehall Palace. The Banqueting Hall</p></td>
<td class="number">329</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig186">186</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of St. Paul’s Cathedral, London (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">330</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig187">187</a></td>
<td><p>Exterior of St. Paul’s Cathedral</p></td>
<td class="number">331</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig188">188</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Blenheim (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">332</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig189">189</a></td>
<td><p>St. Martin’s-in-the-Fields, London</p></td>
<td class="number">333</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig190">190</a></td>
<td><p>Renaissance Houses, Brussels</p></td>
<td class="number">335</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig191">191</a></td>
<td><p>The Castle, Hämelschenburg <!-- missing umlaut --></p></td>
<td class="number">341</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig192">192</a></td>
<td><p>The Friedrichsbau, Heidelberg Castle</p></td>
<td class="number">344</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig193">193</a></td>
<td><p>Pavilion of Zwinger Palace, Dresden</p></td>
<td class="number">345</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig194">194</a></td>
<td><p>Marienkirche, Dresden</p></td>
<td class="number">346</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig195">195</a></td>
<td><p>Portal of University, Salamanca</p></td>
<td class="number">349</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig196">196</a></td>
<td><p>Court (Patio) of Casa de Zaporta</p></td>
<td class="number">350</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig197">197</a></td>
<td><p>Palace of Charles V., Granada</p></td>
<td class="number">351</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig198">198</a></td>
<td><p>Façade of British Museum, London</p></td>
<td class="number">357</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig199">199</a></td>
<td><p>St. George’s Hall, Liverpool</p></td>
<td class="number">358</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig200">200</a></td>
<td><p>The Old Museum, Berlin</p></td>
<td class="number">359</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig201">201</a></td>
<td><p>The Propylæa, Munich</p></td>
<td class="number">360</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig202">202</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of the Panthéon, Paris (G.)</p></td>
<td class="number">361</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig203">203</a></td>
<td><p>Exterior of the Panthéon</p></td>
<td class="number">362</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig204">204</a></td>
<td><p>Arch of Triumph of l’Étoile, Paris</p></td>
<td class="number">363</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig205">205</a></td>
<td><p>The Madeleine, Paris</p></td>
<td class="number">364</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig206">206</a></td>
<td><p>Door of École des Beaux-Arts, Paris</p></td>
<td class="number">365</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig207">207</a></td>
<td><p>St. Isaac’s Cathedral, St. Petersburg</p></td>
<td class="number">366</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig208">208</a></td>
<td><p>Plan of Louvre and Tuileries (A.)</p></td>
<td class="number">371</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig209">209</a></td>
<td><p>Pavilion Richelieu, Louvre</p></td>
<td class="number">372</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig210">210</a></td>
<td><p>Grand Staircase, Paris Opera House</p></td>
<td class="number">373</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig211">211</a></td>
<td><p>Fountain of Longchamps, Marseilles</p></td>
<td class="number">374</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig212">212</a></td>
<td><p>Galliéra Museum, Paris</p></td>
<td class="number">375</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig213">213</a></td>
<td><p>Royal Theatre, Dresden</p></td>
<td class="number">376</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig214">214</a></td>
<td><p>Maria-Theresienhof, Vienna</p></td>
<td class="number">377</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig215">215</a></td>
<td><p>Houses of Parliament, London</p></td>
<td class="number">379</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig216">216</a></td>
<td><p>Assize Courts, Manchester</p></td>
<td class="number">380</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number">
<span class="pagenum">xvii</span>
<a name="pagexvii" id="pagexvii"> </a>
<a href="#fig217">217</a></td>
<td><p>Natural History Museum, South Kensington</p></td>
<td class="number">381</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig218">218</a></td>
<td><p>Christ Church, Philadelphia</p></td>
<td class="number">386</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig219">219</a></td>
<td><p>Craigie House, Cambridge (Mass.)</p></td>
<td class="number">387</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig220">220</a></td>
<td><p>National Capitol, Washington</p></td>
<td class="number">389</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig221">221</a></td>
<td><p>Custom House, New York</p></td>
<td class="number">390</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig222">222</a></td>
<td><p>Trinity Church, Boston</p></td>
<td class="number">394</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig223">223</a></td>
<td><p>Public Library, Woburn (Mass.)</p></td>
<td class="number">395</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig224">224</a></td>
<td><p>Times Building, New York</p></td>
<td class="number">396</td>
</tr>

<!-- 8th edn. delete following, add Country House at Nyack, N.Y. and
Country House in Colonial Style -->

<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig225">225</a></td>
<td><p>Country House (Mass.)</p></td>
<td class="number">398</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig226">226</a></td>
<td><p>Porch of Temple of Vimalah Sah, Mount Abu.</p></td>
<td class="number">406</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig227">227</a></td>
<td><p>Tower of Victory, Chittore</p></td>
<td class="number">407</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig228">228</a></td>
<td><p>Double Temple at Hullabîd: Detail</p></td>
<td class="number">410</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="number"><a href="#fig229">229</a></td>
<td><p>Shrine of Soubramanya, Tanjore</p></td>
<td class="number">412</td>
</tr>
</table>

<div class="maintext">

<span class="pagenum">1</span>
<a name="page1" id="page1"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapI" id="chapI">CHAPTER I.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
PRIMITIVE AND PREHISTORIC ARCHITECTURE.</h3>

<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: Desor, <i>Les
constructions lacustres du lac de Neufchatel</i>. Fergusson, <i>Rude
Stone Monuments</i>. R.&nbsp;C. Hoare, <i>Ancients Wiltshire</i>. Lyell,
<i>The Antiquity of Man</i>. Lubbock, <i>Prehistoric Times</i>.
Nadaillac, <i>Prehistoric America</i>. Rougemont, <i>L’age du
Bronze</i>. Tylor, <i>Primitive Culture</i>.</p>

<p><b>EARLY BEGINNINGS.</b> It is impossible to trace the early stages
of the process by which true architecture grew out of the first rude
attempts of man at building. The oldest existing monuments of
architecture&mdash;those of Chaldæa and Egypt&mdash;belong to an
advanced civilization. The rude and elementary structures built by
savage and barbarous peoples, like the Hottentots or the tribes of
Central Africa, are not in themselves works of architecture, nor is any
instance known of the evolution of a civilized art from such beginnings.
So far as the monuments testify, no savage people ever raised itself to
civilization, and no primitive method of building was ever developed
into genuine architecture, except by contact with some existing
civilization of which it appropriated the spirit, the processes, and the
forms. How the earliest architecture came into existence is as yet an
unsolved problem.</p>

<p><b>PRIMITIVE ARCHITECTURE</b> is therefore a subject for the
archæologist rather than the historian of art, and needs here only the
briefest mention. If we may judge of the condition of the primitive
races of antiquity by that of the savage and barbarous peoples of our
own time, they required
<span class="pagenum">2</span>
<a name="page2" id="page2"> </a>
only the simplest kinds of buildings, though the purposes which they
served were the same as those of later times in civilized communities.
A&nbsp;hut or house for shelter, a&nbsp;shrine of some sort for worship,
a&nbsp;stockade for defence, a&nbsp;cairn or mound over the grave of the
chief or hero, were provided out of the simplest materials, and these
often of a perishable nature. Poles supplied the framework; wattles,
skins, or mud the walls; thatching or stamped earth the roof. Only the
simplest tools were needed for such elementary construction. There was
ingenuity and patient labor in work of this kind; but there was no
planning, no fitting together into a complex organism of varied
materials shaped with art and handled with science. Above all, there was
no progression toward higher ideals of fitness and beauty. Rudimentary
art displayed itself mainly in objects of worship, or in carvings on
canoes and weapons, executed as talismans to ward off misfortune or to
charm the unseen powers; but even this art was sterile and never grew of
itself into civilized and progressive art.</p>

<p>Yet there must have been at some point in the remote past an
exception to this rule. Somewhere and somehow the people of Egypt must
have developed from crude beginnings the architectural knowledge and
resource which meet us in the oldest monuments, though every vestige of
that early age has apparently perished. But although nothing has come
down to us of the actual work of the builders who wrought in the
primitive ages of mankind, there exist throughout Europe and Asia almost
countless monuments of a primitive character belonging to relatively
recent times, but executed before the advent of historic civilization to
the regions where they are found. A&nbsp;general resemblance among them
suggests a common heritage of traditions from the hoariest antiquity,
and throws light on the probable character of the transition from
barbaric to civilized architecture.</p>

<span class="pagenum">3</span>
<a name="page3" id="page3"> </a>
<p><b>PREHISTORIC MONUMENTS.</b> These monuments vary widely as well as
in excellence; some of them belong to Roman or even Christian times;
others to a much remoter period. They are divided into two principal
classes, the megalithic structures and lake dwellings. The latter class
may be dismissed with the briefest mention. It comprises a considerable
number of very primitive houses or huts built on wooden piles in the
lakes of Switzerland and several other countries in both hemispheres,
and forming in some cases villages of no mean size. Such villages, built
over the water for protection from attack, are mentioned by the writers
of antiquity and portrayed on Assyrian reliefs. The objects found in
them reveal an incipient but almost stationary civilization, extending
back from three thousand to five thousand years or more, and lasting
through the ages of stone and bronze down into historic times.</p>

<p>The <b>megalithic</b> remains of Europe and Asia are far more
important. They are very widely distributed, and consist in most cases
of great blocks of stone arranged in rows, circles, or avenues,
sometimes with huge lintels resting upon them. Upright stones without
lintels are called <i>menhirs</i>; standing in pairs with lintels they
are known as <i>dolmens</i>; the circles are called <i>cromlechs</i>.
Some of the stones are of gigantic size, some roughly hewn into shape;
others left as when quarried. Their age and purpose have been much
discussed without reaching positive results. It is probable that, like
the lake dwellings, they cover a long range of time, reaching from the
dawn of recorded history some thousands of years back into the unknown
past, and that they were erected by races which have disappeared before
the migrations to which Europe owes her present populations. That most
of them were in some way connected with the worship of these prehistoric
peoples is generally admitted; but whether as temples, tombs, or
memorials
<span class="pagenum">4</span>
<a name="page4" id="page4"> </a>
of historical or mythical events cannot, in all cases, be positively
asserted. They were not dwellings or palaces, and very few were even
enclosed buildings. They are imposing by the size and number of their
immense stones, but show no sign of advanced art, or of conscious
striving after beauty of design. The small number of “carved stones,”
bearing singular ornamental patterns, symbolic or mystical rather than
decorative in intention, really tends to prove this statement rather
than to controvert it. It is not impossible that the dolmens were
generally intended to be covered by mounds of earth. This would group
them with the tumuli referred to below, and point to a sepulchral
purpose in their erection. Some antiquaries, Fergusson among them,
contend that many of the European circles and avenues were intended as
battle-monuments or trophies.</p>

<p>There are also <b>walls</b> of great antiquity in various parts of
Europe, intended for fortification; the most important of these in
Greece and Italy will be referred to in later chapters. They belong to a
more advanced art, some of them even deserving to be classed among works
of archaic architecture.</p>

<p>The <b>tumuli</b>, or burial mounds, which form so large a part of
the prehistoric remains of both continents, are interesting to the
architect only as revealing the prototypes of the pyramids of Egypt and
the subterranean tombs of Mycenæ and other early Greek centres. The
piling of huge cairns or commemorative heaps of stone is known from the
Scriptures and other ancient writings to have been a custom of the
greatest antiquity. The pyramids and the Mausoleum at Halicarnassus are
the most imposing and elaborate outgrowths of this practice, of which
the prehistoric tumuli are the simpler manifestations.</p>

<p>These crude and elementary products of undeveloped civilizations have
no place, however, in any list of genuine architectural works. They
belong rather to the domain of
<span class="pagenum">5</span>
<a name="page5" id="page5"> </a>
archæology and ethnology, and have received this brief mention only as
revealing the beginnings of the builder’s art, and the wide gap that
separates them from that genuine architecture which forms the subject of
the following chapters.</p>

<p class="monuments">
<b>MONUMENTS</b>: The most celebrated in England are at Avebury, an
avenue, large and small circles, barrows, and the great tumuli of
Bartlow and Silbury “Hills;” at Stonehenge, on Salisbury Plain, great
megalithic circles and many barrows; “Sarsen stones” at Ashdown; tumuli,
dolmens, chambers, and circles in Derbyshire. In Ireland, many cairns
and circles. In Scotland, circles and barrows in the Orkney Islands. In
France, Carnac and Lokmariaker in Brittany are especially rich in
dolmens, circles, and avenues. In Scandinavia, Germany, and Italy, in
India and in Africa, are many similar remains.</p>




<span class="pagenum">6</span>
<a name="page6" id="page6"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapII" id="chapII">CHAPTER II.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
EGYPTIAN ARCHITECTURE.</h3>

<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: Champollion,
<i>Monuments de l’Egypte et de la Nubie</i>. Choisy, <i>L’art de bâtir
chez les Egyptiens</i>. Flinders-Petrie, <i>History of Egypt; Ten Years
Digging in Egypt, 1881&ndash;91</i>. Jomard, <i>Description de l’Egypte,
Antiquités</i>. Lepsius, <i>Denkmäler aus Aegypten und Aethiopien</i>.
Mariette, <i>Monuments of Upper Egypt</i>. Maspero, <i>Egyptian
Archæology</i>. Perrot and Chipiez, <i>History of Art in Ancient
Egypt</i>. Prisse d’Avennes, <i>Histoire de l’art égyptien</i>. Reber,
<i>History of Ancient Art</i>. Rossellini, <i>Monumenti del Egitto</i>.
Wilkinson, <i>Manners and Customs of Ancient Egyptians</i>.</p>


<p><b>LAND AND PEOPLE.</b> As long ago as 5000 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, the Egyptians were a people already highly
civilized, and skilled in the arts of peace and war. The narrow valley
of the Nile, fertilized by the periodic overflow of the river, was
flanked by rocky heights, nearly vertical in many places, which afforded
abundance of excellent building stone, while they both isolated the
Egyptians and protected them from foreign aggression. At the Delta,
however, the valley widened out, with the falling away of these heights,
into broad lowlands, from which there was access to the outer world.</p>

<p>The art history of Egypt may be divided into five periods as
follows:</p>

<p>I. <span class="smallcaps">The Ancient Empire</span> (cir.
4500?-3000 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), comprising the first
ten dynasties, with Memphis as the capital.</p>

<p>II. <span class="smallcaps">The First Theban Monarchy</span> or
<span class="smallcaps">Middle Empire</span> (3000&ndash;2100 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) comprising the eleventh, twelfth, and
thirteenth dynasties reigning at Thebes.<!-- invisible . --></p>

<span class="pagenum">7</span>
<a name="page7" id="page7"> </a>
<p>The Hyksos invasion, or incursion of the Shepherd Kings, interrupted
the current of Egyptian art history for a period of unknown length,
probably not less than four or five centuries.</p>

<p>III. <span class="smallcaps">The Second Theban Monarchy</span>
(1700?-1000 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), comprising the
eighteenth to twentieth dynasties inclusive, was the great period of
Egyptian history; the age of conquests and of vast edifices.</p>

<p>IV. <span class="smallcaps">The Decadence</span> or <span class="smallcaps">Saitic Period</span> (1000&ndash;324 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), comprising the dynasties twenty-one to thirty
(Saitic, Bubastid, Ethiopic, etc.), reigning at Sais, Tanis, and
Bubastis, and the Persian conquest; a&nbsp;period almost barren of
important monuments.</p>

<p>(Periods III. and IV. constitute together the period of the <span
class="smallcaps">New Empire</span>, if we omit the Persian
dominion.)</p>

<p>V. <span class="smallcaps">The Revival</span> (from 324 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span> to cir. 330 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>) comprises the Ptolemaic or Macedonian and
Roman dominations.</p>


<p><b>THE ANCIENT EMPIRE: THE PYRAMIDS.</b> The great works of this
period are almost exclusively sepulchral, and include the most ancient
buildings of which we have any remains. While there is little of
strictly architectural art, the overwhelming size and majesty of the
Pyramids, and the audacity and skill shown in their construction,
entitle them to the first place in any sketch of this period. They
number over a hundred, scattered in six groups, from Abu-Roash in the
north to Meidoum in the south, and are of various shapes and sizes. They
are all royal tombs and belong to the first twelve dynasties; each
contains a sepulchral chamber, and each at one time possessed a small
chapel adjacent to it, but this has, in almost every case, perished.</p>

<p>Three pyramids surpass all the rest by their prodigious size; these
are at Ghizeh and belong to the fourth dynasty. They are known by the
names of their builders; the oldest and greatest being that of
<b>Cheops</b>, or Khufu;<a class="tag" name="tag1" id="tag1" href="#note1">1</a> the second,
<span class="pagenum">8</span>
<a name="page8" id="page8"> </a>
that of <b>Chephren</b>, or Khafra; and the third, that of
<b>Mycerinus</b>, or Menkhara. Other smaller ones stand at the feet of
these giants.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig1" id="fig1"> </a>
<img src="images/fig1.png" width="342" height="217"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 1.&mdash;SECTION OF GREAT PYRAMID.<br>
<span class="caption">
<i>a, King’s Chamber; b, Queen’s Chamber; c, Chamber cut in
Rock.</i></span></p>

<p>The base of the “Great Pyramid” measures 764 feet on a side; its
height is 482 feet, and its volume must have originally been nearly
three and one-half million cubic yards (Fig.&nbsp;1). It is constructed
of limestone upon a plateau of rock levelled to receive it, and was
finished externally, like its two neighbors, with a coating of polished
stone, supposed by some to have been disposed in bands of different
colored granites, but of which it was long ago despoiled. It contained
three principal chambers and an elaborate system of inclined passages,
all executed in finely cut granite and limestone. The sarcophagus was in
the uppermost chamber, above which the superincumbent weight was
relieved by open spaces and a species of rudimentary arch of <span class="sans">Λ</span>-shape (Fig.&nbsp;2). The other two pyramids differ
from that of Cheops in the details of their arrangement and in size, not
in the principle of their construction. Chephren is 454 feet high, with
a base 717
<span class="pagenum">9</span>
<a name="page9" id="page9"> </a>
feet square. Mycerinus, which still retains its casing of pink granite,
is but 218 feet in height, with a base 253 feet on a side.</p>

<p class="illustration floatleft w180">
<a name="fig2" id="fig2"> </a>
<img src="images/fig2.png" width="159" height="228"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 2.&mdash;SECTION OF KING’S CHAMBER.</p>

<p>Among the other pyramids there is considerable variety both of type
and material. At Sakkarah is one 190 feet high, constructed in six
unequal steps on a slightly oblong base measuring nearly 400 × 357 feet.
It was attributed by Mariette to Ouenephes, of the first dynasty, though
now more generally ascribed to Senefrou of the third. At Abu-Seir and
Meidoum are other stepped pyramids; at Dashour is one having a broken
slope, the lower part steeper than the upper. Several at Meroë with
unusually steep slopes belong to the Ethiopian dynasties of the
Decadence. A&nbsp;number of pyramids are built of brick.</p>


<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig3" id="fig3"> </a>
<img src="images/fig3.png" width="204" height="209"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 3.&mdash;PLAN OF SPHINX TEMPLE.</p>

<p><b>TOMBS.</b> The Ancient Empire has also left us a great number of
tombs of the type known as <i>Mastabas</i>. These are oblong rectangular
structures of stone or brick with slightly inclined sides and flat
ceilings. They uniformly face the east, and are internally divided into
three parts; the chamber or chapel, the <i>serdab</i>, and the well. In
the first of these, next the entrance, were placed the offerings made to
the <i>Ka</i> or “double,” for whom
<span class="pagenum">10</span>
<a name="page10" id="page10"> </a>
also scenes of festivity or worship were carved and painted on its walls
to minister to his happiness in his incorporeal life. The serdabs, or
secret inner chambers, of which there were several in each mastaba,
contained statues of the defunct, by which the existence and identity of
the Ka were preserved. Finally came the well, leading to the mummy
chamber, deep underground, which contained the sarcophagus. The
sarcophagi, both of this and later ages, are good examples of the minor
architecture of Egypt; many of them are panelled in imitation of wooden
construction and richly decorated with color, symbols, and
hieroglyphs.</p>


<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig4" id="fig4"> </a>
<img src="images/fig4.png" width="236" height="122"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 4.&mdash;RUINS OF SPHINX TEMPLE.</p>

<p><b>OTHER MONUMENTS.</b> Two other monuments of the Ancient Empire
also claim attention: the <b>Sphinx</b> and the adjacent so-called
“<b>Sphinx temple</b>” at Ghizeh. The first of these, a&nbsp;huge
sculpture carved from the rock, represents Harmachis in the form of a
human-headed lion. It is ordinarily partly buried in the sand; is 70
feet long by 66 feet high, and forms one of the most striking monuments
of Egyptian art. Close to it lie the nearly buried ruins of the temple
once supposed to be that of the Sphinx, but now proved by Petrie to have
been erected in connection with the second pyramid. The plan and present
aspect of this venerable edifice are shown in Figs. 3 and&nbsp;4. The
hall was roofed with stone lintels carried on sixteen square monolithic
piers of alabaster. The whole was buried in a rectangular mass of
masonry and revetted internally with alabaster, but was wholly destitute
internally as well as externally of decoration or even of mouldings.
With the exception of scanty remains of a few of the pyramid-temples or
chapels, and the
<span class="pagenum">11</span>
<a name="page11" id="page11"> </a>
temple discovered by Petrie in Meidoum, it is the only survival from the
temple architecture of that early age.</p>


<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig5" id="fig5"> </a>
<img src="images/fig5.png" width="243" height="176"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 5.&mdash;TOMB AT ABYDOS.</p>

<p><b>THE MIDDLE EMPIRE: TOMBS.</b> The monuments of this period, as of
the preceding, are almost wholly sepulchral. We now encounter two types
of tombs. One, structural and pyramidal, is represented by many examples
at Abydos, the most venerated of all the burial grounds of Egypt
(Fig.&nbsp;5). All of these are built of brick, and are of moderate size
and little artistic interest. The second type is that of tombs cut in
the vertical cliffs of the west bank of the Nile Valley. The entrance to
these faces eastward as required by tradition; the remoter end of the
excavation pointing toward the land of the Sun of Night. But such
tunnels only become works of architecture when, in addition to the
customary mural paintings, they receive a decorative treatment in the
design of their structural forms.
<span class="illustration floatleft">
<a name="fig6" id="fig6"> </a>
<img src="images/fig6.png" width="252" height="187"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 6.&mdash;TOMB AT BENI-HASSAN.</span>
Such a treatment appears in several tombs at Beni-Hassan, in which
columns are reserved in cutting away the rock, both in the
chapel-chambers and in the vestibules or porches which precede them.
These columns are polygonal in some cases, clustered
<span class="pagenum">12</span>
<a name="page12" id="page12"> </a>
in others. The former type, with eight, sixteen, or thirty-two sides (in
these last the <i>arrises</i> or edges are emphasized by a slight
concavity in each face, like embryonic fluting), have a square abacus,
suggesting the Greek Doric order, and giving rise to the name
<i>proto-Doric</i> (Fig.&nbsp;6). Columns of this type are also found at
Karnak, Kalabshé, Amada, and Abydos. A&nbsp;reminiscence of primitive
wood construction is seen in the dentils over the plain architrave of
the entrance, which in other respects recalls the triple entrances to
certain mastabas of the Old Empire. These dentils are imitations of the
ends of rafters, and to some archæologists suggest a wooden origin for
the whole system of columnar design. But these rock-cut shafts and heavy
architraves in no respect resemble wooden prototypes, but point rather
to an imitation cut in the rock of a well-developed, pre-existing system
of stone construction, some of whose details, however, were undoubtedly
derived from early methods of building in wood. The vault was below the
chapel and reached by a separate entrance. The serdab was replaced by a
niche in which was the figure of the defunct carved from the native
rock. Some of the
<span class="pagenum">13</span>
<a name="page13" id="page13"> </a>
tombs employed in the chapel-chamber columns of quatrefoil section with
capitals like clustered buds (Fig.&nbsp;7), and this type became in the
next period one of the most characteristic forms of Egyptian
architecture.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig7" id="fig7"> </a>
<img src="images/fig7.png" width="291" height="214"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 7.&mdash;SECTION AND HALF-PLAN OF A TOMB AT BENI-HASSAN.</p>


<p><b>TEMPLES.</b> Of the temples of this period only two have left any
remains of importance. Both belong to the twelfth dynasty (cir. 2200
<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>). Of one of these many badly
shattered fragments have been found in the ruins of Bubastis; these show
the clustered type of lotus-bud column mentioned above. The other, of
which a few columns have been identified among the ruins of the Great
Temple at Karnak, constituted the oldest part of that vast agglomeration
of religious edifices, and employed columns of the so-called proto-Doric
type. From these remains it appears that structural stone columns as
well as those cut in the rock were used at this early period (2200 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span>). Indeed, it is probable that the whole
architectural system of the New Empire was based on models developed in
the age we are considering; that the use of multiplied columns of
various types and the building of temples of complex plan adorned with
colossal statues, obelisks, and painted reliefs, were perfectly
understood and practised in this period. But the works it produced have
perished, having been most probably demolished to make way for the more
sumptuous edifices of later times.</p>


<p><b>THE NEW EMPIRE.</b> This was the grand age of Egyptian
architecture and history. An extraordinary series of mighty men ruled
the empire during a long period following the expulsion of the Hyksos
usurpers. The names of Thothmes, Amenophis, Hatasu, Seti, and Rameses
made glorious the eighteenth and nineteenth dynasties. Foreign conquests
in Ethiopia, Syria, and Assyria enlarged the territory and increased the
splendor of the empire. The majority of the most impressive ruins of
Egypt belong to this period, and it was in these buildings that the
characteristic
<span class="pagenum">14</span>
<a name="page14" id="page14"> </a>
elements of Egyptian architecture were brought to perfection and carried
out on the grandest scale.</p>


<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig8" id="fig8"> </a>
<img src="images/fig8.png" width="169" height="362"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 8.&mdash;PLAN OF THE RAMESSEUM.</p>

<p class="caption w180">
<i>a, Sanctuary; b, Hypostyle Hall; c, Second court; d, Entrance court;
e, Pylons.</i></p>

<p><b>TOMBS OF THE NEW EMPIRE.</b> Some of these are structural, others
excavated; both types displaying considerable variety in arrangement and
detail. The rock-cut tombs of Bab-el-Molouk, among which are twenty-five
royal sepulchres, are striking both by the simplicity of their openings
and the depth and complexity of their shafts, tunnels, and chambers.
From the pipe-like length of their tunnels they have since the time of
Herodotus been known by the name <i>syrinx</i>. Every precaution was
taken to lead astray and baffle the intending violator of their
sanctity. They penetrated hundreds of feet into the rock; their
chambers, often formed with columns and vault-like roofs, were
resplendent with colored reliefs and ornament destined to solace and
sustain the shadowy Ka until the soul itself, the Ba, should arrive
before the tribunal of Osiris, the Sun of Night. Most impressively do
these brilliant pictures,<a class="tag" name="tag2" id="tag2" href="#note2">2</a> intended to be forever shut away from human eyes,
attest the sincerity of the Egyptian belief and the conscientiousness of
the art which it inspired.</p>

<p>While the tomb of the private citizen was complete in itself,
containing the Ka-statues and often the chapel, as well as the mummy,
the royal tomb demanded something more elaborate in scale and
arrangement. In some cases
<span class="pagenum">15</span>
<a name="page15" id="page15"> </a>
external structures of temple-form took the place of the underground
chapel and serdab. The royal effigy, many times repeated in painting and
sculpture throughout this temple-like edifice, and flanking its gateways
with colossal seated figures, made buried Ka-statues unnecessary. Of
these sepulchral temples three are of the first magnitude. They are that
of <b>Queen Hatasu</b> (XVIIIth dynasty) at Deir-el-Bahari; that of
<b>Rameses II.</b> (XIXth dynasty), the <b>Ramesseum</b>, near by to the
southwest; and that of <b>Rameses III.</b> (XXth dynasty) at Medinet
Abou still further to the southwest. Like the tombs, these were all on
the west side of the Nile; so also was the sepulchral temple of
Amenophis III.<!-- invisible . --> (XVIIIth dynasty), the
<b>Amenopheum</b>, of which hardly a trace remains except the two seated
colossi which, rising from the Theban plain, have astonished travellers
from the times of Pausanias and Strabo down to our own. These mutilated
figures, one of which has been known ever since classic times as the
“vocal Memnon,” are 56 feet high, and once flanked the entrance to the
forecourt of the temple of Amenophis. The plan of the Ramesseum, with
its sanctuary, hypostyle hall, and forecourts, its pylons and obelisks,
is shown in Figure&nbsp;8, and may be compared with those of other
temples given on pp. 17 and 18. That of Medinet Abou resembles it
closely. The Ramesseum occupies a rectangle of 590 × 182 feet; the
temple of Medinet Abou measures 500 × 160 feet, not counting the extreme
width of the entrance pylons. The temple of Hatasu at Deir-el-Bahari is
partly excavated and partly structural, a&nbsp;model which is also
followed on a smaller scale in several lesser tombs. Such an edifice is
called a <i>hemispeos</i>.</p>

<div class="footnote">

<p><a name="note1" id="note1" href="#tag1">1.</a>
The Egyptian names known to antiquity are given here first in the more
familiar classic form, and then in the Egyptian form.</p>

<p><a name="note2" id="note2" href="#tag2">2.</a>
See Van Dyke’s <i>History of Painting</i>, Figure 1.</p>

</div>



<span class="pagenum">16</span>
<a name="page16" id="page16"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapIII" id="chapIII">CHAPTER III.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
EGYPTIAN ARCHITECTURE&mdash;<i>Continued</i>.</h3>

<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: Same as for
Chapter&nbsp;II.</p>


<p><b>TEMPLES.</b> The surpassing glory of the New Empire was its great
temples. Some of them were among the most stupendous creations of
structural art. To temples rather than palaces were the resources and
energies of the kings devoted, and successive monarchs found no more
splendid outlet for their piety and ambition than the founding of new
temples or the extension and adornment of those already existing. By the
forced labor of thousands of fellaheen (the system is in force to this
day and is known as the <i>corvée</i>) architectural piles of vast
extent could be erected within the lifetime of a monarch. As in the
tombs the internal walls bore pictures for the contemplation of the Ka,
so in the temples the external walls, for the glory of the king and the
delectation of the people, were covered with colored reliefs reciting
the monarch’s glorious deeds. Internally the worship and attributes of
the gods were represented in a similar manner, in endless iteration.</p>


<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig9" id="fig9"> </a>
<img src="images/fig9.png" width="180" height="377"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 9.&mdash;TEMPLE OF EDFOU. PLAN.</p>

<p><b>THE TEMPLE SCHEME.</b> This is admirably shown in the temple of
Khonsu, at Karnak, built by Rameses III. (XXth dynasty), and in the
temple of Edfou (Figs. 9 and 10), though this belongs to the Roman
period. It comprised a sanctuary or <i>sekos</i>, a&nbsp;hypostyle
(columnar) hall, known as the “hall of assembly,” and a forecourt
preceded by a double pylon or
<span class="pagenum">17</span>
<a name="page17" id="page17"> </a>
gateway. Each of these parts might be made more or less complex in
different temples, but the essential features are encountered everywhere
under all changes of form. The building of a temple began with the
sanctuary, which contained the sacred chamber and the shrine of the god,
with subordinate rooms for the priests and for various rites and
functions. These chambers were low, dark, mysterious, accessible only to
the priests and king. They were given a certain dignity by being raised
upon a sort of platform above the general level, and reached by a few
steps. They were sumptuously decorated internally with ritual pictures
in relief. The hall was sometimes loftier, but set on a slightly lower
level; its massive columns supported a roof of stone lintels, and light
was admitted either through clearstory windows under the roof of a
central portion higher than the sides, as at Karnak, or over a low
screen-wall built between the columns of the front row, as at Edfou and
Denderah. This method was peculiar to the Ptolemaic and Roman periods.
The court was usually surrounded
<span class="pagenum">18</span>
<a name="page18" id="page18"> </a>
by a single or double colonnade; sometimes, however, this colonnade only
flanked the sides or fronted the hall, or again was wholly wanting. The
<i>pylons</i> were twin buttress-like masses flanking the entrance gate
of the court. They were shaped like oblong truncated pyramids, crowned
by flaring cornices, and were decorated on the outer face with masts
carrying banners, with obelisks, or with seated colossal figures of the
royal builder. An avenue of sphinxes formed the approach to the
entrance, and the whole temple precinct was surrounded by a wall,
usually of crude brick, pierced by one or more gates with or without
pylons. The piety of successive monarchs was displayed in the addition
of new hypostyle halls, courts, pylons, or obelisks, by which the temple
was successively extended in length, and sometimes also in width, by the
increased dimensions of the new courts. The great Temple of Karnak most
strikingly illustrates this growth. Begun by Osourtesen (XIIth dynasty)
more than 2000 years <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, it was not
completed in its present form until the time of the Ptolemies, when the
last of the pylons and external gates were erected.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig10" id="fig10"> </a>
<img src="images/fig10.png" width="441" height="99"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 10.&mdash;TEMPLE OF EDFOU. SECTION.</p>

<p>The variations in the details of this general type were numerous.
Thus, at El Kab, the temple of Amenophis III.
<span class="pagenum">19</span>
<a name="page19" id="page19"> </a>
has the sekos and hall but no forecourt. At Deir-el-Medineh the hall of
the Ptolemaic Hathor-temple is a mere porch in two parts, while the
enclosure within the circuit wall takes the place of the forecourt. At
Karnak all the parts were repeated several times, and under Amenophis
III. (XVIIIth dynasty) a&nbsp;wing was built at a nearly right angle to
the main structure. At Luxor, to a complete typical temple were added
three aisles of an unfinished hypostyle hall, and an elaborate
forecourt, whose axis is inclined to that of the other buildings, owing
to a bend of the river at that point. At Abydos a complex sanctuary of
many chambers extends southeast at right angles to the general mass, and
the first court is without columns. But in all these structures a
certain unity of effect is produced by the lofty pylons, the flat roofs
diminishing in height over successive portions from the front to the
sanctuary, the sloping windowless walls covered with carved and painted
pictures, and the dim and massive interiors of the columnar halls.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig11" id="fig11"> </a>
<img src="images/fig11.png" width="445" height="203"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 11.&mdash;TEMPLE OF KARNAK. PLAN.<br>
<a class="closeup" href="images/fig11_large.png" target="_blank">
Larger View</a></p>


<p><b>TEMPLES OF KARNAK.</b> Of these various temples that of
<b>Amen-Ra</b> is incomparably the largest and most imposing. Its
construction extended through the whole duration of the New Empire, of
whose architecture it is a splendid <i>résumé</i> (Fig. 11). Its extreme
length is 1,215 feet, and its greatest width 376 feet. The sanctuary and
its accessories, mainly built by Thothmes&nbsp;I. and Thothmes III.,
cover an area nearly 456 × 290 feet in extent, and comprise two
hypostyle halls and countless smaller halls and chambers. It is preceded
by a narrow columnar vestibule and two pylons enclosing a columnar
atrium and two obelisks. This is entered from the <b>Great Hypostyle
Hall</b> (<i>h</i> in Fig. 11; Fig. 12), the noblest single work of
Egyptian architecture, measuring 340 × 170 feet, and containing 134
columns in sixteen rows, supporting a massive stone roof. The central
columns with bell-capitals are 70 feet high and nearly 12 feet in
diameter; the others are smaller and lower, with lotus-bud capitals,
supporting
<span class="pagenum">20</span>
<a name="page20" id="page20"> </a>
a&nbsp;roof lower than that over the three central aisles.
A&nbsp;clearstory of stone-grated windows makes up the difference in
height between these two roofs. The interior, thus lighted, was splendid
with painted reliefs, which helped not only to adorn the hall but to
give scale to its massive parts. The whole stupendous creation was the
work of three kings&mdash;Rameses&nbsp;I., Seti&nbsp;I., and Rameses II.
(XIXth dynasty).</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig12" id="fig12"> </a>
<img src="images/fig12.jpg" width="415" height="202"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 12.&mdash;CENTRAL PORTION OF HYPOSTYLE HALL AT KARNAK.<br>
<span class="caption">
(From model in Metropolitan Museum, New York.)</span></p>

<p>In front of it was the great court, flanked by columns, and still
showing the ruins of a central avenue of colossal pillars begun, but
never completed, by the Bubastid kings of the XXIId dynasty. One or two
smaller structures and the curious lateral wing built by Amenophis III.,
interrupt the otherwise orderly and symmetrical advance of this plan
from the sanctuary to the huge first pylon (last in point of date)
erected by the Ptolemies.</p>

<p>The smaller temple of Khonsu, south of that of Amen-Ra, has already
been alluded to as a typical example of templar design. Next to Karnak
in importance comes the <b>Temple of Luxor</b> in its immediate
neighborhood. It has two forecourts adorned with double-aisled
colonnades and
<span class="pagenum">21</span>
<a name="page21" id="page21"> </a>
connected by what seems to be an unfinished hypostyle hall. The
<b>Ramesseum</b> and the temples of <b>Medinet Abou</b> and
<b>Deir-El-Bahari</b> have already been mentioned (<a href="#page15">p.&nbsp;15</a>). At Gournah and Abydos are the next most
celebrated temples of this period; the first famous for its rich
clustered lotus-columns, the latter for its beautiful sanctuary
chambers, dedicated each to a different deity, and covered with delicate
painted reliefs of the time of Seti&nbsp;I.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig13" id="fig13"> </a>
<img src="images/fig13.jpg" width="434" height="333"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 13.&mdash;GREAT TEMPLE OF IPSAMBOUL.</p>

<p><b>GROTTO TEMPLES.</b> Two other styles of temple remain to be
noticed. The first is the subterranean or grotto temple, of which the
two most famous, at Ipsamboul (Abou-simbel), were excavated by Rameses
II. They are truly colossal conceptions, reproducing in the native rock
the main features of structural temples, the court being represented by
the larger of two chambers in the Greater Temple (Fig. 13)
<span class="pagenum">22</span>
<a name="page22" id="page22"> </a>
Their façades are adorned with colossal seated figures of the builder;
the smaller has also two effigies of Nefert-Ari, his consort. Nothing
more striking and boldly impressive is to be met with in Egypt than
these singular rock-cut façades. Other rock-cut temples of more modest
dimensions are at Addeh, Feraig, Beni-Hassan (the “Speos Artemidos”),
Beit-el-Wali, and Silsileh. At Gherf-Hossein, Asseboua, and Derri are
temples partly excavated and partly structural.</p>


<p><b>PERIPTERAL TEMPLES.</b> The last type of temple to be noticed is
represented by only three or four structures of moderate size; it is the
<i>peripteral</i>, in which a small chamber is surrounded by columns,
usually mounted on a terrace with vertical walls. They were mere
chapels, but are among the most graceful of existing ruins. At Philæ are
two structures, one by Nectanebo, the other Ptolemaic, resembling
peripteral temples, but without cella-chambers or roofs. They may have
been waiting-courts for the adjoining temples. That at Elephantine
(Amenophis III.) has square piers at the sides, and columns only at the
ends. Another by Thothmes II., at Medinet Abou, formed only a part (the
sekos?) of a larger plan. At Edfou is another, belonging to the
Ptolemaic period.</p>


<p><b>LATER TEMPLES.</b> After the architectural inaction of the
Decadence came a marvellous recrudescence of splendor under the
Ptolemies, whose Hellenic origin and sympathies did not lead them into
the mistaken effort to impose Greek models upon Egyptian art. The
temples erected under their dominion, and later under Roman rule, vied
with the grandest works of the Ramessidæ, and surpassed them in the rich
elaboration and variety of their architectural details. The temple at
Edfou (Figs. <a href="#fig9">9</a>, <a href="#fig10">10</a>, 14) is
the most perfectly preserved, and conforms most closely to the typical
plan; that of Isis, at Philæ, is the most elaborate and ornate. Denderah
also possesses a group of admirably
<span class="pagenum">23</span>
<a name="page23" id="page23"> </a>
preserved temples of the same period. At Esneh, and at Kalabshé and
Kardassy or Ghertashi in Nubia are others.<!-- invisible . --> In all
these one notes innovations of detail and a striving for effect quite
different from the simpler majesty of the preceding age (Fig. 14). One
peculiar feature is the use of screen walls built into the front rows of
columns of the hypostyle hall. Light was admitted above these walls,
which measured about half the height of the columns and were interrupted
at the centre by a curious doorway cut through their whole height and
without any lintel. Long disused types of capital were revived and
others greatly elaborated; and the wall-reliefs were arranged in bands
and panels with a regularity and symmetry rather Greek than
Egyptian.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig14" id="fig14"> </a>
<img src="images/fig14.jpg" width="432" height="248"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 14.&mdash;EDFOU. FRONT OF HYPOSTYLE HALL.</p>

<p><b>ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS.</b> With the exception of a few purely
utilitarian vaulted structures, all Egyptian architecture was based on
the principle of the lintel. Artistic splendor depended upon the use of
painted and carved pictures, and the decorative treatment of the very
simple supports
<span class="pagenum">24</span>
<a name="page24" id="page24"> </a>
employed. Piers and columns sustained the roofs of such chambers as were
too wide for single lintels, and produced, in halls like those of
Karnak, of the Ramesseum, or of Denderah, a&nbsp;stupendous effect by
their height, massiveness, number, and colored decoration. The simplest
piers were plain square shafts; others, more elaborate, had lotus stalks
and flowers or heads of Hathor carved upon them. The most striking were
those against whose front faces were carved colossal figures of Osiris,
as at Luxor, Medmet Abou, and Karnak (Fig. 15). The columns, which were
seldom over six diameters in height, were treated with greater variety;
the shafts, slightly tapering upward, were either round or clustered in
section, and usually contracted at the base. The capitals with which
they were crowned were usually of one of the five chief types described
below. Besides round and clustered shafts, the Middle Empire and a few
of the earlier monuments of the New Empire employed polygonal or
slightly fluted shafts (see <a href="#page11">p.&nbsp;11</a>), as at
Beni Hassan and Karnak; these had a plain square abacus, with sometimes
a cushion-like echinus beneath it. A&nbsp;round plinth served as a base
for most of the columns.</p>


<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig15" id="fig15"> </a>
<img src="images/fig15.png" width="154" height="258"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 15.&mdash;OSIRID PIER (MEDINET ABOU).</p>

<p><b>CAPITALS.</b> The five chief types of capital were:
<i>a</i>,&nbsp;the plain lotus bud, as at Karnak (Great Hall);
<i>b</i>,&nbsp;the clustered lotus bud (Beni-Hassan, Karnak, Luxor,
Gournah, etc.); <i>c</i>,&nbsp;the <i>campaniform</i> or inverted bell
(central aisles at Karnak, Luxor, the Ramesseum); <i>d</i>,&nbsp;the
palm-capital, frequent in the later temples; and <i>e</i>,&nbsp;the
Hathor-headed, in which heads of Hathor adorn the four faces of a
cubical mass surmounted by a model of a shrine (Sedinga, Edfou,
Denderah,
<span class="pagenum">25</span>
<a name="page25" id="page25"> </a>
Esneh). These types were richly embellished and varied by the Ptolemaic
architects, who gave a clustered or quatrefoil plan to the bell-capital,
or adorned its surface with palm leaves. A&nbsp;few other forms are met
with as exceptions. The first four are shown in Fig.&nbsp;16.</p>

<p>Every part of the column was richly decorated in color. Lotus-leaves
or petals swathed the swelling lower part of the shaft, which was
elsewhere covered with successive bands of carved pictures and of
hieroglyphics. The capital was similarly covered with carved and painted
ornament, usually of lotus-flowers or leaves, or alternate stalks of
lotus and papyrus.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig16" id="fig16"> </a>
<img src="images/fig16.png" width="246" height="175"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 16.&mdash;TYPES OF COLUMN.<br>
<span class="caption">
<i>a, Campaniform; b, Clustered Lotus-Column;<br>
c, Simple Lotus-Column; d, Palm-Column.</i></span></p>

<p>The lintels were plain and square in section, and often of prodigious
size. Where they appeared externally they were crowned with a simple
cavetto cornice, its curved surface covered with colored flutings
alternating with <i>cartouches</i> of hieroglyphics. Sometimes,
especially on the screen walls of the Ptolemaic age, this was surmounted
by a cresting of adders or uræi in closely serried rank. No other form
of cornice or cresting is met with. Mouldings as a means of
architectural effect were singularly lacking in Egyptian architecture.
The only moulding known is the clustered torus (<i>torus</i> = a convex
moulding of semicircular profile), which resembles a bundle of reeds
tied together with cords or ribbons. It forms an astragal under the
cavetto cornice and runs down the angles of the pylons and walls.</p>

<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig17" id="fig17"> </a>
<img src="images/fig17.png" width="136" height="156"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 17.&mdash;EGYPTIAN FLORAL<br>
ORNAMENT-FORMS.</p>

<p><b>POLYCHROMY AND ORNAMENT.</b> Color was absolutely
<span class="pagenum">26</span>
<a name="page26" id="page26"> </a>
essential to the decorative scheme. In the vast and dim interiors, as
well as in the blinding glare of the sun, mere sculpture or relief would
have been wasted. The application of brilliant color to pictorial forms
cut in low relief, or outlined by deep incision with the edges of the
figures delicately rounded (<i>intaglio rilievo</i>) was the most
appropriate treatment possible. The walls and columns were covered with
pictures treated in this way, and the ceilings and lintels were
embellished with symbolic forms in the same manner. All the ornaments,
as distinguished from the paintings, were symbolical, at least in their
origin. Over the gateway was the solar disk or globe with wide-spread
wings, the symbol of the sun winging its way to the conquest of night;
upon the ceiling were sacred vultures, zodiacs, or stars spangled on a
blue ground. Externally the temples presented only masses of unbroken
wall; but these, as well as the pylons, were covered with huge pictures
of a historical character. Only in the tombs do we find painted ornament
of a purely conventional sort (Fig. 17). Rosettes, diaper patterns,
spirals, and checkers are to be met with in them; but many of these can
be traced to symbolic origins.<a class="tag" name="tag3" id="tag3"
href="#note3">3</a></p>


<p><b>DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURE.</b> The only remains of palaces are the
pavilion of Rameses III. at Medinet Abou, and another at Semneh. The
Royal Labyrinth has so completely perished that even its site is
uncertain. The Egyptians lived so much out of doors that the house was a
less important edifice than in colder climates. Egyptian dwellings were
probably in most cases built of wood or crude
<span class="pagenum">27</span>
<a name="page27" id="page27"> </a>
brick, and their disappearance is thus easily explained. Relief pictures
on the monuments indicate the use of wooden framing for the walls, which
were probably filled in with crude brick or panels of wood. The
architecture was extremely simple. Gateways like those of the temples on
a smaller scale, the cavetto cornice on the walls, and here and there a
porch with carved columns of wood or stone, were the only details
pretending to elegance. The ground-plans of many houses in ruined
cities, as at Tel-el-Amarna and a nameless city of Amenophis IV., are
discernible in the ruins; but the superstructures are wholly wanting. It
was in religious and sepulchral architecture that the constructive and
artistic genius of the Egyptians was most fully manifested.</p>

<div class="monuments">

<p><b>MONUMENTS</b>: The principal necropolis regions of Egypt are
centred about Ghizeh and ancient Memphis for the Old Empire (pyramids
and mastabas), Thebes for the Middle Empire (Silsileh, Beni Hassan), and
Thebes (Vale of the Kings, Vale of the Queens) and Abydos for the New
Empire.</p>

<p>The Old Empire has also left us the Sphinx, Sphinx temple, and the
temple at Meidoum.</p>

<p>The most important temples of the New Empire were those of Karnak
(the great temple, the southern or temple of Khonsu), of Luxor, Medinet
Abou (great temple of Rameses III., lesser temples of Thothmes II. and
III. with peripteral sekos; also Pavilion of Rameses III.); of Abydos;
of Gournah; of Eilithyia (Amenophis III.); of Soleb and Sesebi in Nubia;
of Elephantine (peripteral); the tomb temple of Deir-el-Bahari, the
Ramesseum, the Amenopheum; hemispeos at Gherf Hossein; two grotto
temples at Ipsamboul.</p>

<p>At Meroë are pyramids of the Ethiopic kings of the Decadence.</p>

<p>Temples of the Ptolemaic period<ins class="correction" title="text has ; for :">: </ins>Philæ, Denderah.</p>

<p>Temples of the Roman period: Koum Ombos, Edfou; Kalabshé,<!--
invisible , --> Kardassy and Dandour in Nubia; Esneh.</p>

</div>

<p class="footnote">
<a name="note3" id="note3" href="#tag3">3.</a>
See Goodyear’s <i>Grammar of the Lotus</i> for an elaborate and
ingenious presentation of the theory of a common lotus-origin for all
the conventional forms occurring in Egyptian ornament.</p>




<span class="pagenum">28</span>
<a name="page28" id="page28"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapIV" id="chapIV">CHAPTER IV.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
CHALDÆAN AND ASSYRIAN ARCHITECTURE.</h3>

<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before, Reber.
Also, Babelon, <i>Manual of Oriental Antiquities</i>. Botta and Flandin,
<i>Monuments de Ninive</i>. Layard, <i>Discoveries in Nineveh</i>;
<i>Nineveh and its Remains</i>. Loftus, <i>Travels and Researches in
Chaldæa and Susiana</i>. Perrot and Chipiez, <i>History of Art in
Chaldæa and Assyria</i>. Peters, <i>Nippur</i>. Place, <i>Ninive et
l’Assyrie</i>.</p>


<p><b>SITUATION; HISTORIC PERIODS.</b> The Tigro-Euphrates valley was
the seat of a civilization nearly or quite as old as that of the Nile,
though inferior in its monumental art. The kingdoms of Chaldæa and
Assyria which ruled in this valley, sometimes as rivals and sometimes as
subjects one of the other, differed considerably in character and
culture. But the scarcity of timber and the lack of good building-stone
except in the limestone table-lands and more distant mountains of upper
Mesopotamia, the abundance of clay, and the flatness of the country,
imposed upon the builders of both nations similar restrictions of
conception, form, and material. Both peoples, moreover, were probably,
in part at least, of Semitic race.<a class="tag" name="tag4" id="tag4" href="#note4">4</a> The Chaldæans attained civilization as
early as 4000 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, and had for
centuries maintained fixed institutions and practised the arts and
sciences when the Assyrians began their career as a nation of conquerors
by reducing Chaldæa to subjection.</p>

<span class="pagenum">29</span>
<a name="page29" id="page29"> </a>
<p>The history of Chaldæo-Assyrian art may be divided into three main
periods, as follows:</p>

<p>1. The <span class="smallcaps">Early Chaldæan</span>, 4000 to 1250
<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span></p>

<p>2. The <span class="smallcaps">Assyrian</span>, 1250 to 606 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span></p>

<p>3. The <span class="smallcaps">Babylonian</span>, 606 to 538 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span></p>

<p>In 538 the empire fell before the Persians.</p>


<p><b>GENERAL CHARACTER OF MONUMENTS.</b> Recent excavations at Nippur
(Niffer), the sacred city of Chaldæa, have uncovered ruins older than
the Pyramids. Though of slight importance architecturally, they reveal
the early knowledge of the arch and the possession of an advanced
culture. The poverty of the building materials of this region afforded
only the most limited resources for architectural effect. Owing to the
flatness of the country and the impracticability of building lofty
structures with sun-dried bricks, elevation above the plain could be
secured only by erecting buildings of moderate height upon enormous
mounds or terraces, built of crude brick and faced with hard brick or
stone. This led to the development of the stepped pyramid as the typical
form of Chaldæo-Assyrian architecture. Thick walls were necessary both
for stability and for protection from the burning heat of that climate.
The lack of stone for columns and the difficulty of procuring heavy
beams for long spans made broad halls and chambers impossible. The plans
of Assyrian palaces look like assemblages of long corridors and small
cells (Fig. 18). Neither the wooden post nor the column played any part
in this architecture except for window-mullions and subordinate
members.<a class="tag" name="tag5" id="tag5" href="#note5">5</a><!-- invisible . --> It is probable that the vault was
used for roofing many of the halls; the arch was certainly employed for
doors and the barrel-vault for the drainage-tunnels
<span class="pagenum">30</span>
<a name="page30" id="page30"> </a>
under the terraces, made necessary by the heavy rainfall. What these
structures lacked in durability and height was made up in decorative
magnificence. The interior walls were wainscoted to a height of eight or
nine feet with alabaster slabs covered with those low-relief pictures of
hunting scenes, battles, and gods, which now enrich the museums of
London, Paris, and other modern cities. Elsewhere painted plaster or
more durable enamelled tile in brilliant colors embellished the walls,
and, doubtless, rugs and tapestries added their richness to this
architectural splendor.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig18" id="fig18"> </a>
<img src="images/fig18.png" width="357" height="375"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 18.&mdash;PALACE OF SARGON AT KHORSABAD.</p>


<p><b>CHALDÆAN ARCHITECTURE.</b> The ruins at Mugheir (the Biblical Ur),
dating, perhaps, from 2200 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>,
belong to the two-storied terrace or platform of a temple to Sin or
Hurki.
<span class="pagenum">31</span>
<a name="page31" id="page31"> </a>
The wall of sun-dried brick is faced with enamelled tile. The shrine,
which was probably small, has wholly disappeared from the summit of the
mound. At Warka (the ancient Erech) are two terrace-walls of palaces,
one of which is ornamented with convex flutings and with a species of
mosaic in checker patterns and zigzags, formed by terra-cotta cones or
spikes driven into the clay, their exposed bases being enamelled in the
desired colors. The other shows a system of long, narrow panels, in a
style suggesting the influence of Egyptian models through some as yet
unknown channel. This panelling became a common feature of the later
Assyrian art (see Fig. 19). At Birs-Nimroud are the ruins of a stepped
pyramid surmounted by a small shrine. Its seven stages are said to have
been originally faced with glazed tile of the seven planetary colors,
gold, silver, yellow, red, blue, white, and black. The ruins at Nippur,
which comprise temples, altars, and dwellings dating from 4000 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, have been alluded to. Babylon, the
later capital of Chaldæa, to which the shapeless mounds of Mujehbeh and
Kasr seem to have belonged, has left no other recognizable vestige of
its ancient magnificence.</p>


<p><b>ASSYRIAN ARCHITECTURE.</b> Abundant ruins exist of Nineveh, the
Assyrian capital, and its adjacent palace-sites. Excavations at
Koyunjik, Khorsabad, and Nimroud have laid bare a number of these royal
dwellings. Among them are the palace of Assur-nazir-pal (885 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) and two palaces of Shalmaneser II.<!--
invisible . --> (850 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span><!-- missing
second . -->) at Nimroud; the great palace of Sargon at Khorsabad (721
<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span><!-- invisible first . -->); that
of Sennacherib at Koyunjik (704 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>);
of Esarhaddon at Nimroud (650 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>);
and of Assur-bani-pal at Koyunjik (660 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>). All of these palaces are designed on the same
general principle, best shown by the plan (Fig. 18) of the palace of
Sargon at Khorsabad, excavated by Botta and Place.</p>

<p>In this palace two large and several smaller courts are surrounded by
a complex series of long, narrow halls and
<span class="pagenum">32</span>
<a name="page32" id="page32"> </a>
small, square chambers. One court probably belonged to the harem,
another to the king’s apartments, others to dependents and to the
service of the palace. The crude brick walls are immensely thick and
without windows, the only openings being for doors. The absence of
columns made wide halls impossible, and great size could only be
attained in the direction of length. A&nbsp;terraced pyramid supported
an altar or shrine to the southwest of the palace; at the west corner
was a temple, the substructure of which was crowned by a cavetto cornice
showing plainly the influence of Egyptian models. The whole palace stood
upon a stupendous platform faced with cut stone, an unaccustomed
extravagance in Assyria.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig19" id="fig19"> </a>
<img src="images/fig19.png" width="315" height="227"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 19.&mdash;GATE, KHORSABAD.</p>

<p><b>ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS.</b> There is no evidence that the Assyrians
ever used columnar supports except in minor or accessory details. There
are few halls in any of the ruins too wide to be spanned by good Syrian
cedar beams or palm timbers, and these few cases seem to have had
vaulted ceilings. So clumsy a feature as the central wall in the great
hall of Esarhaddon’s palace at Nimroud would never have been resorted to
for the support of the ceiling, had
<span class="pagenum">33</span>
<a name="page33" id="page33"> </a>
the Assyrians been familiar with the use of columns. That they
understood the arch and vault is proved by their admirable
terrace-drains and the fine arched gate in the walls of Khorsabad (Fig.
19), as well as by bas-reliefs representing dwellings with domes of
various forms. Moreover, a&nbsp;few vaulted chambers of moderate size,
and fallen fragments of crude brick vaulting of larger span, have been
found in several of the Assyrian ruins.</p>

<p>The construction was extremely simple. The heavy clay walls were
faced with alabaster, burned brick, or enamelled tiles. The roofs were
probably covered with stamped earth, and sometimes paved on top with
tiles or slabs of alabaster to form terraces. Light was introduced most
probably through windows immediately under the roof and divided by small
columns forming mullions, as suggested by certain relief pictures. No
other system seems consistent with the windowless walls of the ruins. It
is possible that many rooms depended wholly on artificial light or on
the scant rays coming through open doors. To this day, in the hot season
the population of Mosul takes refuge from the torrid heats of summer in
windowless basements lighted only by lamps.</p>


<p><b>ORNAMENT.</b> The only structural decorations seem to have been
the panelling of exterior walls in a manner resembling the Chaldæan
terrace-walls, and a form of parapet like a stepped cresting. There were
no characteristic mouldings, architraves, capitals, or cornices. Nearly
all the ornament was of the sort called <i>applied</i>, <i>i.e.</i>,
added after the completion of the structure itself. Pictures in low
relief covered the alabaster revetment. They depicted hunting-scenes,
battles, deities, and other mythological subjects, and are interesting
to the architect mainly for their occasional representations of
buildings and details of construction. Above this wainscot were friezes
of enamelled brick ornamented with symbolic forms used as decorative
<span class="pagenum">34</span>
<a name="page34" id="page34"> </a>
motives; winged bulls, the “sacred tree” and mythological monsters, with
rosettes, palmettes, lotus-flowers, and <i>guilloches</i> (ornaments of
interlacing bands winding about regularly spaced buttons or eyes). These
ornaments were also used on the archivolts around the great arches of
palace gates. The most singular adornments of these gates were the
carved “portal guardians” set into the deep jambs&mdash;colossal
monsters with the bodies of bulls, the wings of eagles, and human heads
of terrible countenance. Of mighty bulk, they were yet minutely wrought
in every detail of head-dress, beard, feathers, curly hair, and
anatomy.</p>

<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig20" id="fig20"> </a>
<img src="images/fig20.png" width="183" height="143"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 20.&mdash;ASSYRIAN ORNAMENT.</p>

<p>The purely conventional ornaments mentioned above&mdash;the rosette,
guilloche, and lotus-flower, and probably also the palmette, were
derived from Egyptian originals. They were treated, however, in a quite
new spirit and adapted to the special materials and uses of their
environment. Thus the form of the palmette, even if derived, as is not
unlikely, from the Egyptian lotus-motive, was assimilated to the more
familiar palm-forms of Assyria (Fig. 20).</p>

<p>Assyrian architecture never rivalled the Egyptian in grandeur or
constructive power, in seriousness, or the higher artistic qualities. It
did, however, produce imposing results with the poorest resources, and
in its use of the arch and its development of ornamental forms it
furnished prototypes for some of the most characteristic features of
later Asiatic art, which profoundly influenced both Greek and Byzantine
architecture.</p>

<p class="monuments">
<b>MONUMENTS</b>: The most important Chaldæan and Assyrian monuments of
which there are extant remains, have already been enumerated in the
text. It is therefore unnecessary to duplicate the list here.</p>

<div class="footnote">

<p><a name="note4" id="note4" href="#tag4">4.</a>
This is denied by some recent writers, so far as the Chaldæans are
concerned, and is not intended here to apply to the Accadians and
Summerians of primitive Chaldæa.</p>

<p><a name="note5" id="note5" href="#tag5">5.</a>
See Fergusson, <i>Palaces of Nineveh and Persepolis</i>, for an
ingenious but unsubstantiated argument for the use of columns in
Assyrian palaces.</p>

</div>




<span class="pagenum">35</span>
<a name="page35" id="page35"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapV" id="chapV">CHAPTER V.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
PERSIAN, LYCIAN AND JEWISH ARCHITECTURE.</h3>

<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before, Babelon;
Bliss, <i>Excavations at Jerusalem</i>. Reber. Also Dieulafoy, <i>L’Art
antique de la Perse</i>. Fellows, <i>Account of Discoveries in
Lycia</i>. Fergusson, <i>The Temple at Jerusalem</i>. Flandin et Coste,
<i>Perse ancienne</i>. Perrot and Chipiez, <i>History of Art in
Persia</i>; <i>History of Art in Phrygia, Lydia, Caria, and Lycia</i>;
<i>History of Art in Sardinia and Judæa</i>. Texier, <i>L’Arménie et la
Perse</i>; <i>L’Asie Mineure</i>. De Vogüé, <i>Le Temple de
Jérusalem</i>.</p>


<p><b>PERSIAN ARCHITECTURE.</b> With the Persians, who under Cyrus (536
<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) and Cambyses (525 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) became the masters of the Orient, the Aryan
race superseded the Semitic, and assimilated in new combinations the
forms it borrowed from the Assyrian civilization. Under the Achæmenidæ
(536 to 330 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) palaces were built
in Persepolis and Susa of a splendor and majesty impossible in
Mesopotamia, and rivalling the marvels in the Nile Valley. The
conquering nation of warriors who had overthrown the Egyptians and
Assyrians was in turn conquered by the arts of its vanquished foes, and
speedily became the most luxurious of all nations. The Persians were not
great innovators in art; but inhabiting a land of excellent building
resources, they were able to combine the Egyptian system of interior
columns with details borrowed from Assyrian art, and suggestions,
derived most probably from the general use in Persia and Central Asia,
of wooden posts or columns as intermediate supports. Out of these
elements they evolved an architecture which
<span class="pagenum">36</span>
<a name="page36" id="page36"> </a>
has only become fully known to us since the excavations of M. and Mme.
Dieulafoy at Susa in 1882.</p>


<p><b>ELEMENTS OF PERSIAN ARCHITECTURE.</b> The Persians used both crude
and baked bricks, the latter far more freely than was practicable in
Assyria, owing to the greater abundance of fuel. Walls when built of the
weaker material were faced with baked brick enamelled in brilliant
colors, or both moulded and enamelled, to form colored pictures in
relief. Stone was employed for walls and columns, and, in conjunction
with brick, for the jambs and lintels of doors and windows. Architraves
and ceiling-beams were of wood. The palaces were erected, as in Assyria,
upon broad platforms, partly cut in the rock and partly structural,
approached by imposing flights of steps. These palaces were composed of
detached buildings, propylæa or gates of honor, vast audience-halls open
on one or two sides, and chambers or dwellings partly enclosing or
flanking these halls, or grouped in separate buildings. Temples appear
to have been of small importance, perhaps owing to habits of out-of-door
worship of fire and sun. There are few structural tombs, but there are a
number of imposing royal sepulchres cut in the rock at
Naksh-i-Roustam.</p>


<p><b>ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS.</b> The Persians, like the Egyptians, used
the column as an internal feature in hypostyle halls of great size, and
externally to form porches, and perhaps, also, open kiosks without
walls. The great <b>Hall of Xerxes</b> at Persepolis covers 100,000
square feet&mdash;more than double the area of the Hypostyle Hall at
Karnak. But the Persian column was derived from wooden prototypes and
used with wooden architraves, permitting a wider spacing than is
possible with stone. In the present instance thirty-six columns sufficed
for an area which in the Karnak hall contained one hundred and
thirty-four. The shafts being slender and finely fluted instead of
painted or carved, the effect produced was totally different from that
<span class="pagenum">37</span>
<a name="page37" id="page37"> </a>
sought by the Egyptians. The most striking peculiarity of the column was
the capital, which was forked (Fig. 21).<!-- invisible . --> In one of
the two principal types the fork, formed by the coupled fore-parts of
bulls or symbolic monsters, rested directly on the top of the shaft. In
the other, two singular members were interposed between the fork and the
shaft; the lower, a&nbsp;sort of double bell or bell-and-palm capital,
and above it, just beneath the fork, a&nbsp;curious combination of
vertical scrolls or volutes, resembling certain ornaments seen in
Assyrian furniture. The transverse architrave rested in the fork; the
longitudinal architrave was supported on the heads of the monsters.
A&nbsp;rich moulded base, rather high and in some cases adorned with
carved leaves or flutings, supported the columns, which in the Hall of
Xerxes were over 66 feet high and 6 feet in diameter. The architraves
have perished, but the rock-cut tomb of Darius at Naksh-i-Roustam
reproduces in its façade a palace-front, showing a banded architrave
with dentils&mdash;an obvious imitation of the ends of wooden rafters on
a lintel built up of several beams.</p>

<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig21" id="fig21"> </a>
<img src="images/fig21.png" width="158" height="374"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 21.&mdash;COLUMN FROM PERSEPOLIS.</p>

<p>These features of the architrave, as well as the fine flutings and
moulded bases of the columns, are found in Ionic architecture, and in
part, at least, in Lycian tombs. As all these examples date from nearly
the same period, the origin of these forms and their mutual relations
have not been fully determined. The Persian capitals, however, are
<span class="pagenum">38</span>
<a name="page38" id="page38"> </a>
unique, and so far as known, without direct prototypes or derivatives.
Their constituent elements may have been borrowed from various sources.
One can hardly help seeing the Egyptian palm-capital in the lower member
of the compound type (Fig. 21).</p>

<p>The doors and windows had banded architraves or trims and cavetto
cornices very Egyptian in character. The portals were flanked, as in
Assyria, by winged monsters; but these were built up in several courses
of stone, not carved from single blocks like their prototypes. Plaster
or, as at Susa, enamelled bricks, replaced as a wall-finish the Assyrian
alabaster wainscot. These bricks, splendid in color, and moulded into
relief pictures covering large surfaces, are the oldest examples of the
skill of the Persians in a branch of ceramic art in which they have
always excelled down to our own day.</p>


<p><b>LYCIAN ARCHITECTURE.</b> The architecture of those Asiatic peoples
which served as intermediaries between the ancient civilizations of
Egypt and Assyria on the one hand and of the Greeks on the other, need
occupy us only a moment in passing. None of them developed a complete
and independent style or produced monuments of the first rank. Those
chiefly concerned in the transmission of ideas were the Cypriotes,
Phœnicians, and Lycians. The part played by other Asiatic nations is too
slight to be considered here. From Cyprus the Greeks could have learned
little beyond a few elementary notions regarding sculpture and pottery,
although it is possible that the volute-form in Ionic architecture was
originally derived from patterns on Cypriote pottery and from certain
Cypriote steles, where it appears as a modified lotus motive. The
Phœnicians were the world’s traders from a very early age down to the
Persian conquest. They not only distributed through the Mediterranean
lands the manufactures of Egypt and Assyria, but also counterfeited them
and adopted their forms in decorating
<span class="pagenum">39</span>
<a name="page39" id="page39"> </a>
their own wares. But they have bequeathed us not a single architectural
ruin of importance, either of temples or palaces, nor are the few tombs
still extant of sufficient artistic interest to deserve even brief
mention in a work of this scope.</p>

<p>In Lycia, however, there arose a system of tomb-design which came
near creating a new architectural style, and which doubtless influenced
both Persia and the Ionian colonies. The tombs were mostly cut in the
rock, though a few are free-standing monolithic monuments, resembling
sarcophagi or small shrines mounted on a high base or pedestal.</p>

<p>In all of these tombs we recognize a manifest copying in stone of
framed wooden structures. The walls are panelled, or imitate open
structures framed of squared timbers. The roofs are often gabled,
sometimes in the form of a pointed arch; they generally show a banded
architrave, dentils, and a raking cornice, or else an imitation of
broadly projecting eaves with small round rafters. There are several
with porches of Ionic columns; of these, some are of late date and
evidently copied from Asiatic Greek models. Others, and notably one at
Telmissus, seem to be examples of a primitive Ionic, and may indeed have
been early steps in the development of that splendid style which the
Ionic Greeks, both in Asia Minor and in Attica, carried to such
perfection.</p>


<p><b>JEWISH ARCHITECTURE.</b> The Hebrews borrowed from the art of
every people with whom they had relations, so that we encounter in the
few extant remains of their architecture Egyptian, Assyrian, Phœnician,
Greek, Roman, and Syro-Byzantine features, but nothing like an
independent national style. Among the most interesting of these remains
are tombs of various periods, principally occurring in the valleys near
Jerusalem, and erroneously ascribed by popular tradition to the judges,
prophets, and kings of
<span class="pagenum">40</span>
<a name="page40" id="page40"> </a>
Israel. Some of them are structural, some cut in the rock; the former
(tomb of Absalom, of Zechariah) decorated with Doric and Ionic engaged
orders, were once supposed to be primitive types of these orders and of
great antiquity. They are now recognized to be debased imitations of
late Greek work of the third or second century <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span> They have Egyptian cavetto cornices and
pyramidal roofs, like many Asiatic tombs. The openings of the rock-cut
tombs have frames or pediments carved with rich surface ornament showing
a similar mixture of types&mdash;Roman triglyphs and garlands,
Syrian-Greek acanthus leaves, conventional foliage of Byzantine
character, and naturalistic carvings of grapes and local plant-life. The
carved arches of two of the ancient city gates (one the so-called Golden
Gate) in Jerusalem display rich acanthus foliage somewhat like that of
the tombs, but more vigorous and artistic. If of the time of Herod or
even of Constantine, as claimed by some, they would indicate that Greek
artists in Syria created the prototypes of Byzantine ornament. They are
more probably, however, Byzantine restorations of the 6th
century&nbsp;<span class="smallroman">A.D.</span></p>

<p>The one great achievement of Jewish architecture was the national
<b>Temple of Jehovah</b>, represented by three successive edifices on
Mount Moriah, the site of the present so-called “Mosque of Omar.” The
first, built by Solomon (1012 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>)
appears from the Biblical description<a class="tag" name="tag6" id="tag6" href="#note6">6</a> to have combined Egyptian conceptions
(successive courts, lofty entrance-pylons, the Sanctuary and the sekos
or “Holy of Holies”) with Phœnician and Assyrian details and workmanship
(cedar woodwork, empaistic decoration or overlaying with <i>repoussé</i>
metal work, the isolated brazen columns Jachin and Boaz). The whole
stood on a mighty platform built up with stupendous masonry and vaulted
chambers from the valley surrounding the rock on three
<span class="pagenum">41</span>
<a name="page41" id="page41"> </a>
sides. This precinct was nearly doubled in size by Herod (18 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) who extended it southward by a terrace-wall
of still more colossal masonry. Some of the stones are twenty-two feet
long; one reaches the prodigious length of forty feet. The “Wall of
Lamentations” is a part of this terrace, upon which stood the Temple on
a raised platform. As rebuilt by Herod, the Temple reproduced in part
the antique design, and retained the porch of Solomon along the east
side; but the whole was superbly reconstructed in white marble with
abundance of gilding. Defended by the Castle of Antonia on the
northwest, and embellished with a new and imposing triple colonnade on
the south, the whole edifice, a&nbsp;conglomerate of Egyptian, Assyrian,
and Roman conceptions and forms, was one of the most singular and yet
magnificent creations of ancient art.</p>

<p>The temple of Zerubbabel (515 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), intermediate between those above described,
was probably less a re-edification of the first, than a new design.
While based on the scheme of the first temple, it appears to have
followed more closely the pattern described in the vision of Ezekiel
(chapters xl.-xlii.). It was far inferior to its predecessor in splendor
and costliness. No vestiges of it remain.</p>


<div class="monuments">
<p><b>MONUMENTS.</b> <span class="smallcaps">Persian</span>: at
Murghab, the tomb of Cyrus, known as
Gabré-Madré-Soleiman&mdash;a&nbsp;gabled structure on a seven-stepped
pyramidal basement (525 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>). At
Persepolis the palace of Darius (521 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>); the Propylæa of Xerxes, his palace and his
harem (?) or throne-hall (480 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>).
These splendid structures, several of them of vast size, resplendent
with color and majestic with their singular and colossal columns, must
have formed one of the most imposing architectural groups in the world.
At various points, tower-like tombs, supposed erroneously by Fergusson
to have been fire altars. At Naksh-i-Roustam, the tomb of Darius, cut in
the rock. Other tombs near by at Persepolis proper and at Pasargadæ. At
the latter place remains of the palace of Cyrus. At Susa the palace of
Xerxes and Artaxerxes (480&ndash;405 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>).</p>

<p>There are no remains of private houses or temples.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Lycian</span>: the principal Lycian
monuments are found in Myra, Antiphellus,
<span class="pagenum">42</span>
<a name="page42" id="page42"> </a>
and Telmissus. Some of the monolithic tombs have been removed to the
British and other European museums.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Jewish</span>: the temples have been
mentioned above. The palace of Solomon. The rock-cut monolithic tomb of
Siloam. So-called tombs of Absalom and Zechariah, structural; probably
of Herod’s time or later. Rock-cut Tombs of the Kings; of the Prophets,
etc. City gates (Herodian or early Christian period).</p>
</div>

<p class="footnote">
<a name="note6" id="note6" href="#tag6">6.</a>
1 Kings vi.-vii.; 2 Chronicles iii.-iv.</p>




<span class="pagenum">43</span>
<a name="page43" id="page43"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapVI" id="chapVI">CHAPTER VI.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
GREEK ARCHITECTURE.</h3>

<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before, Reber.
Also, Anderson and Spiers, <i>Architecture of Greece and Rome</i>.
Baumeister, <i>Denkmäler <!-- invisible umlaut --> der Klassischen
Alterthums</i>. Bötticher, <i>Tektonik der Hellenen</i>. Chipiez,
<i>Histoire critique des ordres grecs</i>. Curtius, Adler and Treu,
<i>Die Ausgrabungen zu Olympia</i>. Durm, <i>Antike Baukunst</i> (in
<i>Handbuch d. Arch.</i><!-- missing .-->). Frazer, <i>Pausanias’
Description of Greece</i>. Hitorff, <i>L’architecture polychrome chez
les Grecs</i>. Michaelis, <i>Der Parthenon</i>. Penrose, <i>An
Investigation, etc., of Athenian Architecture</i>. Perrot and Chipiez,
<i>History of Art in Primitive Greece</i>; <i>La Grèce de l’Epopée</i>;
<i>La Grèce archaïque</i>. Stuart and Revett, <i>Antiquities of
Athens</i>. Tarbell, <i>History of Greek Art</i>. Texier, <i>L’Asie
Mineure</i>. Wilkins, <i>Antiquities of Magna Græcia</i>.</p>


<p><b>GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS.</b> Greek art marks the beginning of
European civilization. The Hellenic race gathered up influences and
suggestions from both Asia and Africa and fused them with others, whose
sources are unknown, into an art intensely national and original, which
was to influence the arts of many races and nations long centuries after
the decay of the Hellenic states. The Greek mind, compared with the
Egyptian or Assyrian, was more highly intellectual, more logical, more
symmetrical, and above all more inquiring and analytic. Living nowhere
remote from the sea, the Greeks became sailors, merchants, and
colonizers. The Ionian kinsmen of the European Greeks, speaking a
dialect of the same language, populated the coasts of Asia Minor and
many of the islands, so that through them the
<span class="pagenum">44</span>
<a name="page44" id="page44"> </a>
Greeks were open to the influences of the Assyrian, Phœnician, Persian,
and Lycian civilizations. In Cyprus they encountered Egyptian
influences, and finally, under Psammetichus, they established in Egypt
itself the Greek city of Naukratis. They were thus by geographical
situation, by character, and by circumstances, peculiarly fitted to
receive, develop, and transmit the mingled influences of the East and
the South.</p>


<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig22" id="fig22"> </a>
<img src="images/fig22.png" width="232" height="233"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 22.&mdash;LION GATE AT MYCENÆ.</p>

<p><b>PREHISTORIC MONUMENTS.</b><a class="tag" name="tag7" id="tag7" href="#note7">7</a> Authentic Greek history begins with the
first Olympiad, 776 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span> The earliest
monuments of that historic architecture which developed into the
masterpieces of the Periclean and Alexandrian ages, date from the middle
of the following century. But there are a number of older buildings,
belonging presumably to the so-called Heroic Age, which, though
seemingly unconnected with the later historic development of Greek
architecture, are still worthy of note. They are the work of a people
somewhat advanced in civilization, probably the Pelasgi, who preceded
the Dorians on Greek soil, and consist mainly of fortifications, walls,
gates, and tombs, the most important of which are at <b>Mycenæ</b> and
<b>Tiryns</b>. At the latter place is a well-defined acropolis, with
massive walls in which are passages covered by stones successively
overhanging or corbelled until they meet. The masonry is of huge stones
piled without cement. At Mycenæ the city wall is pierced by the
remarkable <b>Lion Gate</b> (Fig. 22), consisting of two jambs and a
huge lintel,
<span class="pagenum">45</span>
<a name="page45" id="page45"> </a>
over which the weight is relieved by a triangular opening. This is
filled with a sculptured group, now much defaced, representing two
rampant lions flanking a singular column which tapers downward. This
symbolic group has relations with Hittite and Phrygian sculptures, and
with the symbolism of the worship of Rhea Cybele. The masonry of the
wall is carefully dressed but not regularly coursed. Other primitive
walls and gates showing openings and embryonic arches of various forms,
are found widely scattered, at Samos and Delos, at Phigaleia, Thoricus,
Argos and many other points.
<span class="illustration floatleft">
<a name="fig23" id="fig23"> </a>
<img src="images/fig23.png" width="192" height="93"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 23.&mdash;POLYGONAL MASONRY.</span>
The very earliest are hardly more than random piles of rough stone.
Those which may fairly claim notice for their artistic masonry are of a
later date and of two kinds: the coursed, and the polygonal or
Cyclopean, so called from the tradition that they were built by the
Cyclopes. These Cyclopean walls were composed of large, irregular
polygonal blocks carefully fitted together and dressed to a fairly
smooth face (Fig. 23). Both kinds were used contemporaneously, though in
the course of time the regular coursed masonry finally superseded the
polygonal.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig24" id="fig24"> </a>
<img src="images/fig24.png" width="441" height="174"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 24.&mdash;THOLOS OF ATREUS. PLAN AND SECTION.</p>

<p><b>THOLOS OF ATREUS.</b> All these structures present, however, only
the rudiments of architectural art. The so-called <b>Tholos</b> (or
Treasury) of <b>Atreus</b>, at Mycenæ, on the other hand, shows the
germs of truly artistic design (Fig. 24). It is in reality a tomb, and
is one of a large class of prehistoric tombs found in almost every part
of the globe, consisting of a circular stone-walled and stone-roofed
chamber buried under a tumulus of earth. This one is a beehive-shaped
construction of horizontal courses of masonry, with a stone-walled
passage, the <i>dromos</i>, leading to the entrance door.
<span class="pagenum">46</span>
<a name="page46" id="page46"> </a>
Though internally of domical form, its construction with horizontal beds
in the masonry proves that the idea of the true dome with the beds of
each course pitched at an angle always normal to the curve of the vault,
was not yet grasped. A&nbsp;small sepulchral chamber opens from the
great one, by a door with the customary relieving triangle
over&nbsp;it.</p>

<p class="illustration float w120">
<a name="fig25" id="fig25"> </a>
<img src="images/fig25.png" width="128" height="180"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 25.&mdash;THOLOS OF ATREUS. DOORWAY.</p>

<p>Traces of a metal lining have been found on the inner surface of the
dome and on the jambs of the entrance door. This entrance is the most
artistic and elaborate part of the edifice (Fig. 25). The main opening
is enclosed in a three-banded frame, and was once flanked by columns
which, as shown by fragments still existing and by marks on either side
the door, tapered downward as in the sculptured column over the Lion
Gate. Shafts, bases, and capitals were covered with zig-zag bands or
chevrons of fine spirals. This well-studied decoration, the banded
jambs, and the curiously inverted columns (of which several other
examples exist in or near Mycenæ), all point to a fairly developed art,
derived partly from Egyptian and partly from Asiatic sources. That
Egyptian influences had affected this early art is further
<span class="pagenum">47</span>
<a name="page47" id="page47"> </a>
proved by a fragment of carved and painted ornament on a ceiling in
Orchomenos, imitating with remarkable closeness certain ceiling
decorations in Egyptian tombs.</p>


<p><b>HISTORIC MONUMENTS; THE ORDERS.</b> It was the Dorians and Ionians
who developed the architecture of classic Greece. This fact is
perpetuated in the traditional names, Doric and Ionic, given to the two
systems of columnar design which formed the most striking feature of
that architecture. While in Egypt the column was used almost exclusively
as an internal support and decoration, in Greece it was chiefly employed
to produce an imposing exterior effect. It was the most important
element in the temple architecture of the Greeks, and an almost
indispensable adornment of their gateways, public squares, and temple
enclosures. To the column the two races named above gave each a special
and radically distinct development, and it was not until the Periclean
age that the two forms came to be used in conjunction, even by the mixed
Doric-Ionic people of Attica. Each of the two types had its own special
shaft, capital, entablature, mouldings, and ornaments, although
considerable variation was allowed in the proportions and minor details.
The general type, however, remained substantially unchanged from first
to last. The earliest examples known to us of either order show it
complete in all its parts, its later development being restricted to the
refining and perfecting of its proportions and details. The probable
origin of these orders will be separately considered later&nbsp;on.</p>


<p class="illustration floatleft">
<a name="fig26" id="fig26"> </a>
<img src="images/fig26.png" width="173" height="266"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 26.&mdash;GREEK DORIC ORDER.</p>

<p class="caption w180">
<i>A, Crepidoma, or stylobate; b, Column; c, Architrave; d, Tænia; e,
Frieze; f, Horizontal cornice; g, Raking cornice; h, Tympanum of
pediment; k, Metope</i>.</p>

<p><b>THE DORIC.</b> The column of the Doric order (Figs. 26, 27)
consists of a tapering shaft rising directly from the stylobate or
platform and surmounted by a capital of great simplicity and beauty. The
shaft is fluted with sixteen to twenty shallow channellings of segmental
or elliptical section, meeting in sharp edges or <i>arrises</i>. The
capital is made up of a circular cushion or <i>echinus</i> adorned with
fine
<span class="pagenum">48</span>
<a name="page48" id="page48"> </a>
grooves called <i>annulæ</i>, and a plain square <i>abacus</i> or cap
Upon this rests a plain architrave or <i>epistyle</i>, with a narrow
fillet, the <i>tænia</i>, running along its upper edge. The frieze above
it is divided into square panels, called the <i>metopes</i>, separated
by vertical <i>triglyphs</i> having each two vertical grooves and
chamfered edges. There is a triglyph over each column and one over each
intercolumniation, or two in rare instances where the columns are widely
spaced. The cornice consists of a broadly projecting <i>corona</i>
resting on a <i>bed-mould</i> of one or two simple mouldings. Its under
surface, called the <i>soffit</i>, is adorned with <i>mutules</i>,
square, flat projections having each eighteen <i>guttæ</i> depending
from its under side. Two or three small mouldings run along the upper
edge of the corona, which has in addition, over each slope of the gable,
a&nbsp;gutter-moulding or <i>cymatium</i>. The cornices along the
horizontal edges of the roof have instead of the cymatium a row of
<i>antefixæ</i>, ornaments of terra-cotta or marble placed opposite the
foot of each tile-ridge of the roofing. The enclosed triangular field of
the gable, called the <i>tympanum</i>, was in the larger monuments
adorned with sculptured groups resting on the shelf formed by the
horizontal cornice below. Carved ornaments called <i>acroteria</i>
commonly embellished the three angles of the gable or pediment.</p>


<p><b>POLYCHROMY.</b> It has been fully proved, after a century of
debate, that all this elaborate system of parts, severe
<span class="pagenum">49</span>
<a name="page49" id="page49"> </a>
and dignified in their simplicity of form, received a rich decoration of
color. While the precise shades and tones employed cannot be predicated
with certainty, it is well established that the triglyphs were painted
blue and the metopes red, and that all the mouldings were decorated with
leaf-ornaments, “eggs-and-darts,” and frets, in red, green, blue, and
gold. The walls and columns were also colored, probably with pale tints
of yellow or buff, to reduce the glare of the fresh marble or the
whiteness of the fine stucco with which the surfaces of masonry of
coarser stone were primed. In the clear Greek atmosphere and outlined
against the brilliant sky, the Greek temple must have presented an
aspect of rich, sparkling gayety.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig27" id="fig27"> </a>
<img src="images/fig27.jpg" width="243" height="227"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 27.&mdash;DORIC ORDER OF THE PARTHENON.</p>

<p><b>ORIGIN OF THE ORDER.</b> It is generally believed that the details
of the Doric frieze and cornice were reminiscences of a primitive wood
construction. The triglyph suggests the chamfered ends of cross-beams
made up of three planks each; the mutules, the sheathing of the eaves;
and the guttæ, the heads of the spikes or trenails by which the
sheathing was secured. It is known that in early astylar temples the
metopes were left open like the spaces between the ends of
ceiling-rafters. In the earlier peripteral temples, as at Selinus, the
triglyph-frieze is retained around the cella-wall under the ceiling of
the colonnade, where it has no functional significance, as a survival
from times antedating the adoption of the colonnade, when
<span class="pagenum">50</span>
<a name="page50" id="page50"> </a>
the tradition of a wooden roof-construction showing externally had not
yet been forgotten.</p>

<p>A similar wooden origin for the Doric column has been advocated by
some, who point to the assertion of Pausanias that in the Doric Heraion
at Olympia the original wooden columns had with one exception been
replaced by stone columns as fast as they decayed. (See <a href="#page62">p.&nbsp;62</a>.) This, however, only proves that wooden
columns were sometimes used in early buildings, not that the Doric
column was derived from them. Others would derive it from the Egyptian
columns of Beni Hassan (<a href="#page12">p.&nbsp;12</a>), which it
certainly resembles. But they do not explain how the Greeks could have
been familiar with the Beni Hassan column long before the opening of
Egypt to them under Psammetichus; nor why, granting them some knowledge
of Egyptian architecture, they should have passed over the splendors of
Karnak and Luxor to copy these inconspicuous tombs perched high up on
the cliffs of the Nile. It would seem that the Greeks invented this form
independently, developing it in buildings which have perished; unless,
indeed, they brought the idea with them from their primitive Aryan home
in Asia.</p>


<p><b>THE IONIC ORDER</b> was characterized by greater slenderness of
proportion and elegance of detail than the Doric, and depended more on
carving than on color for the decoration of its members (Fig. 28). It
was adopted in the fifth century <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>
by the people of Attica, and used both for civic and religious
buildings, sometimes alone and sometimes in conjunction with the Doric.
The column was from eight to ten diameters in height, against four and
one-third to seven for the Doric. It stood on a base which was usually
composed of two tori (see <a href="#page25">p.&nbsp;25</a> for
definition) separated by a <i>scotia</i> (a&nbsp;concave moulding of
semicircular or semi-elliptical profile), and was sometimes provided
also with a square flat base-block, the <i>plinth</i>. There was much
variety in the proportions and details of these mouldings, which were
often
<span class="pagenum">51</span>
<a name="page51" id="page51"> </a>
enriched by flutings or carved guilloches. The tall shaft bore
twenty-four deep narrow flutings separated by narrow fillets. The
capital was the most peculiar feature of the order. It consisted of a
bead or <i>astragal</i> and echinus, over which was a horizontal band
ending on either side in a scroll or volute, the sides of which
presented the aspect shown in Fig. 29. A&nbsp;thin moulded abacus was
interposed between this member and the architrave.</p>

<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig28" id="fig28"> </a>
<img src="images/fig28.png" width="144" height="192"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 28.&mdash;GREEK IONIC ORDER. (MILETUS.)</p>

<p>The Ionic capital was marked by two awkward features which all its
richness could not conceal. One was the protrusion of the echinus beyond
the face of the band above it, the other was the disparity between the
side and front views of the capital, especially noticeable at the
corners of a colonnade. To obviate this, various contrivances were
tried, none wholly successful. Ordinarily the two adjacent exterior
sides of the corner capital were treated alike, the scrolls at their
meeting being bent out at an angle of 45°, while the two inner faces
simply intersected, cutting each other in halves.</p>

<p>The entablature comprised an architrave of two or three flat bands
crowned by fine mouldings; an uninterrupted frieze, frequently
sculptured in relief; and a simple cornice of great beauty. In addition
to the ordinary bed-mouldings there was in most examples a row of narrow
blocks or <i>dentils</i> under the corona, which was itself crowned by a
high cymatium of extremely graceful profile, carved with the rich
“honeysuckle” (<i>anthemion</i>) ornament. All the mouldings were carved
with the “egg-and-dart,” heart-leaf and anthemion ornaments, so designed
as to recall by their outline
<span class="pagenum">52</span>
<a name="page52" id="page52"> </a>
the profile of the moulding itself. The details of this order were
treated with much more freedom and variety than those of the Doric. The
pediments of Ionic buildings were rarely or never adorned with groups of
sculpture. The volutes and echinus of the capital, the fluting of the
shaft, the use of a moulded circular base, and in the cornice the high
corona and cymatium, these were constant elements in every Ionic order,
but all other details varied widely in the different examples.</p>


<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig29" id="fig29"> </a>
<img src="images/fig29.png" width="172" height="156"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 29.&mdash;SIDE VIEW OF IONIC CAPITAL.</p>

<p><b>ORIGIN OF THE IONIC ORDER.</b> The origin of the Ionic order has
given rise to almost as much controversy as that of the Doric. Its
different elements were apparently derived from various sources. The
Lycian tombs may have contributed the denticular cornice and perhaps
also the general form of the column and capital. In the Persian
architecture of the sixth century <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, the high moulded base, the narrow flutings of
the shaft, the carved bead-moulding and the use of scrolls in the
capital are characteristic features, which may have been borrowed by the
Ionians during the same century, unless, indeed, they were themselves
the work of Ionic or Lycian workmen in Persian employ. The banded
architrave and the use of the volute in the decoration of stele-caps
(from <span class="greek" title="stêlê">στηλη</span> = a memorial
stone or column standing isolated and upright), furniture, and minor
structures are common features in Assyrian, Lycian, and other Asiatic
architecture of early date. The volute or scroll itself as an
independent decorative
<span class="pagenum">53</span>
<a name="page53" id="page53"> </a>
motive may have originated in successive variations of Egyptian
lotus-patterns.<a class="tag" name="tag8" id="tag8" href="#note8">8</a> But the combination of these diverse elements and their
development into the final form of the order was the work of the Ionian
Greeks, and it was in the Ionian provinces of Asia Minor that the most
splendid examples of its use are to be found (Halicarnassus, Miletus,
Priene, Ephesus), while the most graceful and perfect are those of
Doric-Ionic Attica.</p>


<p class="illustration floatleft w180">
<a name="fig30" id="fig30"> </a>
<img src="images/fig30.png" width="147" height="347"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 30.&mdash;GREEK CORINTHIAN ORDER.<br>
<span class="caption">
(From the monument of Lysicrates.)</span></p>

<p><b>THE CORINTHIAN ORDER.</b> This was a late outgrowth of the Ionic
rather than a new order, and up to the time of the Roman conquest was
only used for monuments of small size (see <a href="#fig38">Fig.&nbsp;38</a>). Its entablature in pure Greek examples was
identical with the Ionic; the shaft and base were only slightly changed
in proportion and detail. The capital, however, was a new departure,
based probably on metallic embellishments of altars, pedestals, etc., of
Ionic style. It consisted in the best examples of a high bell-shaped
core surrounded by one or two rows of acanthus leaves, above which were
pairs of branching scrolls meeting at the corners in spiral volutes.
These served to support the angles of a moulded abacus with concave
sides (Fig. 30). One example, from the Tower of the Winds (the clepsydra
of Andronicus Cyrrhestes) at Athens, has only smooth pointed palm-leaves
and no scrolls above a single row of acanthus leaves. Indeed, the
variety and disparity among the different
<span class="pagenum">54</span>
<a name="page54" id="page54"> </a>
examples prove that we have here only the first steps toward the
evolution of an independent order, which it was reserved for the Romans
to fully develop.</p>


<p><b>GREEK TEMPLES; THE TYPE.</b> With the orders as their chief
decorative element the Greeks built up a splendid architecture of
religious and secular monuments. Their noblest works were temples, which
they designed with the utmost simplicity of general scheme, but carried
out with a mastery of proportion and detail which has never been
surpassed. Of moderate size in most cases, they were intended primarily
to enshrine the simulacrum of the deity, and not, like Christian
churches, to accommodate great throngs of worshippers. Nor were they, on
the other hand, sanctuaries designed, like those of Egypt, to exclude
all but a privileged few from secret rites performed only by the priests
and king. The statue of the deity was enshrined in a chamber, the
<i>naos</i> (see plan, Fig. 31), often of considerable size, and
accessible to the public through a columnar porch the <i>pronaos</i>.
A&nbsp;smaller chamber, the <i>opisthodomus</i>, was sometimes added in
the rear of the main sanctuary, to serve as a treasury or depository for
votive offerings. Together these formed a windowless structure called
the <i>cella</i>, beyond which was the rear porch, the <i>posticum</i>
or <i>epinaos</i>. This whole structure was in the larger temples
surrounded by a colonnade, the <i>peristyle</i>, which formed the most
splendid feature of Greek architecture. The external aisle on either
side of the cella was called the <i>pteroma</i>. A&nbsp;single gabled
roof covered the entire building.</p>

<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig31" id="fig31"> </a>
<img src="images/fig31.png" width="164" height="172"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 31.&mdash;TYPES OF GREEK TEMPLE PLANS.</p>

<p class="caption w180">
<i>a, In Antis; b, Prostyle; c, Amphiprostyle; d, Peripteral (The
Parthenon); N, Naos; O, Opisthodomus; S, Statue.</i></p>

<p class="closeup w180">
<a href="images/fig31d_large.png" target="_blank">
Larger View of plan <b>d</b></a></p>

<p>The Greek colonnade was thus an exterior feature, surrounding
<span class="pagenum">55</span>
<a name="page55" id="page55"> </a>
the solid cella-wall instead of being enclosed by it as in Egypt. The
temple was a public, not a royal monument; and its builders aimed, not
as in Egypt at size and overwhelming sombre majesty, but rather at sunny
beauty and the highest perfection of proportion, execution, and detail
(<a href="#fig34">Fig.&nbsp;34</a>).</p>

<p>There were of course many variations of the general type just
described. Each of these has received a special name, which is given
below with explanations and is illustrated in Fig.&nbsp;31.</p>

<p><i>In antis</i>; with a porch having two or more columns enclosed
between the projecting side-walls of the cella.</p>

<p><i>Prostylar</i> (or prostyle); with a columnar porch in front and no
peristyle.</p>

<p><i>Amphiprostylar</i> (or -style); with columnar porches at both ends
but no peristyle.</p>

<p><i>Peripteral</i>; surrounded by columns.</p>

<p><i>Pseudoperipteral</i>; with false or engaged columns built into the
walls of the cella, leaving no pteroma.</p>

<p><i>Dipteral</i>; with double lateral ranges of columns (see <a href="#fig39">Fig.&nbsp;39</a>).</p>

<p><i>Pseudodipteral</i>; with a single row of columns on each side,
whose distance from the wall is equal to two intercolumniations of the
front.</p>

<p><i>Tetrastyle</i>, <i>hexastyle</i>, <i>octastyle</i>,
<i>decastyle</i>, etc.; with four, six, eight, or ten columns in the end
rows.</p>


<p><b>CONSTRUCTION.</b> All the temples known to us are of stone, though
it is evident from allusions in the ancient writers that wood was
sometimes used in early times. (See <a href="#page62">p.&nbsp;62</a>.)
The finest temples, especially those of Attica, Olympia, and Asia Minor,
were of marble. In Magna Græcia, at Assos, and in other places where
marble was wanting, limestone, sandstone, or lava was employed and
finished with a thin, fine stucco. The roof was almost invariably of
wood and gabled, forming at the ends pediments decorated in most cases
with sculpture. The disappearance of these inflammable
<span class="pagenum">56</span>
<a name="page56" id="page56"> </a>
and perishable roofs has given rise to endless speculations as to the
lighting of the cellas, which in all known ruins, except one at
Agrigentum, are destitute of windows. It has been conjectured that light
was admitted through openings in the roof, and even that the central
part of the cella was wholly open to the sky. Such an arrangement is
termed <i>hypæthral</i>, from an expression used in a description by
Vitruvius;<a class="tag" name="tag9" id="tag9" href="#note9">9</a> but this description corresponds to no known structure,
and the weight of opinion now inclines against the use of the hypæthral
opening, except possibly in one or two of the largest temples, in which
a part of the cella in front of the statue may have been thus left open.
But even this partial <i>hypæthros</i> is not substantiated by direct
evidence. It hardly seems probable that the magnificent chryselephantine
statues of such temples were ever thus left exposed to the extremes of
the climate, which are often severe even in Greece. In the model of the
Parthenon designed by Ch. Chipiez for the Metropolitan Museum in New
York, a&nbsp;small clerestory opening through the roof admits a moderate
amount of light to the cella; but this ingenious device rests on no
positive evidence (see <a href="#frontis">Frontispiece</a>).
It seems on the whole most probable that the cella was lighted entirely
by artificial illumination; but the controversy in its present state is
and must be wholly speculative.</p>

<p>The wooden roof was covered with tiles of terra-cotta or marble. It
was probably ceiled and panelled on the under side, and richly decorated
with color and gold. The pteroma had under the exterior roof a ceiling
of stone or marble, deeply panelled between transverse architraves.</p>

<p>The naos and opisthodomus being in the larger temples too wide to be
spanned by single beams, were furnished with interior columns to afford
intermediate support. To avoid the extremes of too great massiveness and
excessive slenderness in these columns, they were built in two stages,
<span class="pagenum">57</span>
<a name="page57" id="page57"> </a>
and advantage was taken of this arrangement, in some cases, at least, to
introduce lateral galleries into the naos.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig32" id="fig32"> </a>
<img src="images/fig32.jpg" width="246" height="372"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 32.&mdash;CARVED ANTHEMION ORNAMENT. ATHENS.</p>

<p><b>SCULPTURE AND CARVING.</b> All the architectural membering was
treated with the greatest refinement of design and execution, and the
aid of sculpture, both in relief and in the round, was invoked to give
splendor and significance to the monument. The statue of the deity was
the focus of internal interest, while externally, groups of statues
representing the Olympian deities or the mythical exploits of gods,
demigods, and heroes, adorned the gables. Relief carvings in the friezes
and metopes commemorated the favorite national myths. In these
sculptures we have the finest known adaptations of pure
sculpture&mdash;<i>i.e.</i>, sculpture treated as such and complete in
itself&mdash;to an architectural framework. The noblest examples of this
decorative sculpture are those of the Parthenon, consisting of figures
in the full round from the pediments, groups in high relief from the
metopes, and the beautiful frieze of the Panathenaic procession from the
cella-wall under the pteroma ceiling. The greater part of these splendid
works are now in the British Museum, whither they were removed by Lord
Elgin in 1801. From Olympia, <ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘Aegina’">Ægina</ins>, and
<span class="pagenum">58</span>
<a name="page58" id="page58"> </a>
Phigaleia, other master-works of the same kind have been transferred to
the museums of Europe. In the Doric style there was little carving other
than the sculpture, the ornament being mainly polychromatic. Greek Ionic
and Corinthian monuments, however, as well as minor works such as
steles, altars, etc., were richly adorned with carved mouldings and
friezes, festoons, acroteria, and other embellishments executed with the
chisel. The anthemion ornament, a&nbsp;form related to the Egyptian
lotus and Assyrian palmette, most frequently figures in these. It was
made into designs of wonderful vigor and beauty (Fig. 32).</p>


<p><b>DETAIL AND EXECUTION.</b> In the handling and cutting of stone the
Greeks displayed a surpassing skill and delicacy. While ordinarily they
were content to use stones of moderate size, they never hesitated at any
dimension necessary for proper effect or solid construction. The lower
drums of the Parthenon peristyle are 6&nbsp;feet 6½ inches in diameter,
and 2&nbsp;feet 10 inches high, cut from single blocks of Pentelic
marble. The architraves of the Propylæa at Athens are each made up of
two lintels placed side by side, the longest 17 feet 7&nbsp;inches long,
3&nbsp;feet 10 inches high, and 2&nbsp;feet 4&nbsp;inches thick. In the
colossal temples of Asia Minor, where the taste for the vast and
grandiose was more pronounced, blocks of much greater size were used.
These enormous stones were cut and fitted with the most scrupulous
exactness. The walls of all important structures were built in regular
courses throughout, every stone carefully bedded with extremely close
joints. The masonry was usually laid up without cement and clamped with
metal; there is no filling in with rubble and concrete between mere
facings of cut stone, as in most modern work. When the only available
stone was of coarse texture it was finished with a coating of fine
stucco, in which sharp edges and minute detail could be worked.</p>

<p>The details were, in the best period, executed with the
<span class="pagenum">59</span>
<a name="page59" id="page59"> </a>
most extraordinary refinement and care. The profiles of capitals and
mouldings, the carved ornament, the arrises of the flutings, were cut
with marvellous precision and delicacy. It has been rightly said that
the Greeks “built like Titans and finished like jewellers.” But this
perfect finish was never petty nor wasted on unworthy or vulgar design.
The just relation of scale between the building and all its parts was
admirably maintained; the ornament was distributed with rare judgment,
and the vigor of its design saved it from all appearance of
triviality.</p>

<p>The sensitive taste of the Greeks led them into other refinements
than those of mere mechanical perfection. In the Parthenon especially,
but also in lesser degree in other temples, the seemingly straight lines
of the building were all slightly curved, and the vertical faces
inclined. This was done to correct the monotony and stiffness of
absolutely straight lines and right angles, and certain optical
illusions which their acute observation had detected. The long
horizontal lines of the stylobate and cornice were made convex upward;
a&nbsp;similar convexity in the horizontal corona of the pediment
counteracted the seeming concavity otherwise resulting from its meeting
with the multiplied inclined lines of the raking cornice. The columns
were almost imperceptibly inclined toward the cella, and the corner
intercolumniations made a trifle narrower than the rest; while the
vertical lines of the arrises of the flutings were made convex outward
with a curve of the utmost beauty and delicacy. By these and other like
refinements there was imparted to the monument an elasticity and vigor
of aspect, an elusive and surprising beauty impossible to describe and
not to be explained by the mere composition and general proportions, yet
manifest to every cultivated eye.<a class="tag" name="tag10" id="tag10" href="#note10">10</a></p>

<div class="footnote">

<p><a name="note7" id="note7" href="#tag7">7.</a>
For enlargement on this topic see <a href="#appA">Appendix&nbsp;A</a>.</p>

<p><a name="note8" id="note8" href="#tag8">8.</a>
As contended by W. H. Goodyear in his <i>Grammar of the Lotus</i>.</p>

<p><a name="note9" id="note9" href="#tag9">9.</a>
Lib.<!-- missing . --> III., Cap. I.</p>

<p><a name="note10" id="note10" href="#tag10">10.</a>
These refinements, first noticed by Allason in 1814, and later confirmed
by Cockerell and Haller as to the columns, were published to the world
in 1838 by Hoffer, verified by Penrose in 1846, and further developed by
the investigations of Ziller and later observers.</p>

</div>




<span class="pagenum">60</span>
<a name="page60" id="page60"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapVII" id="chapVII">CHAPTER VII.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
GREEK ARCHITECTURE&mdash;<i>Continued</i>.</h3>

<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: Same as for Chapter
VI. Also, Bacon and Clarke, <i>Investigations at Assos</i>. Espouy,
<i>Fragments d’architecture antique</i>. Harrison and Verrall,
<i>Mythology and Monuments of Ancient Athens</i>. Hitorff et Zanth,
<i>Recueil des Monuments de Ségeste et Sélinonte</i>. Magne, <i>Le
Parthénon</i>. Koldewey and Puchstein, <i>Die griechischen Tempel in
Unteritalien und Sicilien</i>. Waldstein, <i>The Argive Heræum</i>.</p>


<p><b>HISTORIC DEVELOPMENT.</b> The history of Greek architecture,
subsequent to the Heroic or Primitive Age, may be divided into periods
as follows:</p>

<p>The <span class="smallcaps">Archaic</span>; from 650 to 500 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span></p>

<p>The <span class="smallcaps">Transitional</span>; from 500 to 460
<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, or to the revival of prosperity
after the Persian wars.</p>

<p>The <span class="smallcaps">Periclean</span>; from 460 to 400 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span></p>

<p>The <span class="smallcaps">Florid</span> or <span class="smallcaps">Alexandrian</span>; from 400 to 300 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span></p>

<p>The <span class="smallcaps">Decadent</span>; 300 to 100 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span></p>

<p>The <span class="smallcaps">Roman</span>; 100 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span> to 200 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span></p>

<p>These dates are, of course, somewhat arbitrary; it is impossible to
set exact bounds to style-periods, which must inevitably overlap at
certain points, but the dates, as given above, will assist in
distinguishing the successive phases of the history.</p>

<p><b>ARCHAIC PERIOD.</b> The archaic period is characterized by the
exclusive use of the Doric order, which appears in the earliest
monuments complete in all its parts, but heavy in its proportions and
coarse in its execution. The oldest known temples of this period are the
<b>Apollo Temple</b> at Corinth (650 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>?), and the <b>Northern Temple</b> on the
acropolis at <b>Selinus</b> in Sicily (cir. 610&ndash;590 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>). They are both of a coarse limestone covered
with stucco. The columns are low and massive (4⅓ to 4⅔ diameters in
height), widely spaced, and
<span class="pagenum">61</span>
<a name="page61" id="page61"> </a>
carry a very high entablature. The triglyphs still appear around the
cella wall under the pteroma ceiling, an illogical detail destined to
disappear in later buildings. Other temples at Selinus date from the
middle or latter part of the sixth century; they have higher columns and
finer profiles than those just mentioned. The great <b>Temple of
Zeus</b> at <b>Selinus</b> was the earliest of five colossal Greek
temples of very nearly identical dimensions; it measured 360 feet by 167
feet in plan, but was never completed. During the second half of the
sixth century important Doric temples were built at Pæstum in South
Italy, and Agrigentum in Sicily; the somewhat primitive temple at Assos
in Asia Minor, with uncouth carvings of centaurs and monsters on its
architrave, belongs to this same period. The <b>Temple of Zeus</b> at
<b>Agrigentum</b> (Fig. 33) is another singular and exceptional design,
and was the second of the five colossal temples mentioned above. The
pteroma was entirely enclosed by walls with engaged columns showing
externally, and was of extraordinary width. The walls of the narrow
cella were interrupted by heavy piers supporting atlantes, or applied
statues under the ceiling. There seem to have been windows between these
figures, but it is not clear whence they borrowed their light, unless it
was admitted by the omission of the metopes between the external
triglyphs.</p>

<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig33" id="fig33"> </a>
<img src="images/fig33.png" width="205" height="120"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 33.&mdash;TEMPLE OF ZEUS. AGRIGENTUM.</p>


<p><b>THE TRANSITION.</b> During the transitional period there was a
marked improvement in the proportions, detail, and workmanship of the
temples. The cella was made broader, the columns more slender, the
entablature lighter. The triglyphs disappeared from the cella wall, and
sculpture of a higher order enhanced the architectural effect. The
profiles
<span class="pagenum">62</span>
<a name="page62" id="page62"> </a>
of the mouldings and especially of the capitals became more subtle and
refined in their curves, while the development of the Ionic order in
important monuments in Asia Minor was preparing the way for the
splendors of the Periclean age. Three temples especially deserve notice:
the <b>Athena Temple</b> on the island of <b>Ægina</b>, the <b>Temple of
Zeus</b> at <b>Olympia</b>, and the so-called
<b>Theseum</b>&mdash;perhaps a temple of Heracles&mdash;in Athens. They
belong to the period 470&ndash;450 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; they are all hexastyle and peripteral, and
without triglyphs on the cella wall. Of the three the second in the list
is interesting as the scene of those rites which preceded and
accompanied the Panhellenic Olympian games, and as the central feature
of the Altis, the most complete temple-group and enclosure among all
Greek remains. It was built of a coarse conglomerate, finished with fine
stucco, and embellished with sculpture by the greatest masters of the
time. The adjacent <b>Heraion</b> (temple of Hera) was a highly
venerated and ancient shrine, originally built with wooden columns
which, according to Pausanias, were replaced one by one, as they
decayed, by stone columns. The truth of this statement is attested by
the discovery of a singular variety of capitals among its ruins,
corresponding to the various periods at which they were added. The
Theseum is the most perfectly preserved of all Greek temples, and in the
refinement of its forms is only surpassed by those of the Periclean
age.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig34" id="fig34"> </a>
<img src="images/fig34.jpg" width="425" height="322"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 34.&mdash;RUINS OF THE PARTHENON.</p>

<p><b>THE PERICLEAN AGE.</b> The Persian wars may be taken as the
dividing line between the Transition period and the Periclean age. The
<i>élan</i> of national enthusiasm that followed the expulsion of the
invader, and the glory and wealth which accrued to Athens as the
champion of all Hellas, resulted in a splendid reconstruction of the
Attic monuments as well as a revival of building activity in Asia Minor.
By the wise administration of Pericles and by the genius of Ictinus,
Phidias, and other artists of surpassing
<span class="pagenum">63</span>
<a name="page63" id="page63"> </a>
skill, the Acropolis at Athens was crowned with a group of buildings and
statues absolutely unrivalled. Chief among them was the
<b>Parthenon</b>, the shrine of Athena Parthenos, which the critics of
all schools have agreed in considering the most faultless in design and
execution of all buildings erected by man (Figs. <a href="#fig31">31</a>, 34, and <a href="#frontis">Frontispiece</a>). It was an octastyle peripteral
temple, with seventeen columns on the side, and measured 220 by 100 feet
on the top of the stylobate. It was the work of Ictinus and Callicrates,
built to enshrine the noble statue of the goddess by Phidias,
a&nbsp;standing chryselephantine figure forty feet high. It was the
masterpiece of Greek architecture not only by reason of its refinements
of detail, but also on account of the beauty of its sculptural
adornments. The frieze about the cella wall under the pteroma ceiling,
representing in low relief
<span class="pagenum">64</span>
<a name="page64" id="page64"> </a>
with masterly skill the Panathenaic procession; the sculptured groups in
the metopes, and the superb assemblages of Olympic and symbolic figures
of colossal size in the pediments, added their majesty to the perfection
of the architecture.
<span class="illustration">
<a name="fig35" id="fig35"> </a>
<img src="images/fig35.png" width="173" height="150"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 35.&mdash;PLAN OF ERECHTHEUM.</span>
<span class="illustration">
<a name="fig36" id="fig36"> </a>
<img src="images/fig36.png" width="280" height="183"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 36.&mdash;WEST END OF ERECHTHEUM,<br>
RESTORED.</span>
Here also the horizontal curvatures and other refinements are found in
their highest development. Northward from it, upon the Acropolis, stood
the <b>Erechtheum</b>, an excellent example of the Attic-Ionic style
(Figs. 35, 36). Its singular irregularities of plan and level, and the
variety of its detail, exhibit in a striking way the Greek indifference
to mere formal symmetry when confronted by practical considerations. The
motive in this case was the desire to include in one design several
existing and venerated shrines to Attic deities and heroes&mdash;Athena
Polias, Poseidon, Pandrosus, Erechtheus, Boutes, etc. Begun by unknown
architects in 479 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, and not
completed until 408 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, it remains
in its ruin still one of the most interesting and attractive of ancient
buildings. Its two colonnades of differing design, its beautiful north
doorway, and the unique and noble caryatid porch or balcony on the south
side are unsurpassed in delicate beauty combined with vigor of design.<a
class="tag" name="tag11" id="tag11" href="#note11">11</a>
A&nbsp;smaller monument of the Ionic order, the amphiprostyle temple to
<b>Nike Apteros</b>&mdash;the
<span class="pagenum">65</span>
<a name="page65" id="page65"> </a>
Wingless Victory&mdash;stands on a projecting spur of the Acropolis to
the southwest. It measures only 27 feet by 18 feet in plan; the cella is
nearly square; the columns are sturdier than those of the Erechtheum,
and the execution of the monument is admirable. It was the first
completed of the extant buildings of the group of the Acropolis and
dates from 466&nbsp;<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span></p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig37" id="fig37"> </a>
<img src="images/fig37.png" width="237" height="213"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 37.&mdash;PROPYLÆA AT ATHENS. PLAN.</p>

<p>In the <b>Propylæa</b> (Fig. 37), the monumental gateway to the
Acropolis, the Doric and Ionic orders appear to have been combined for
the first time (437 to 432 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>). It
was the master work of Mnesicles. The front and rear façades were Doric
hexastyles; adjoining the front porch were two projecting lateral wings
employing a smaller Doric order. The central passageway led between two
rows of Ionic columns to the rear porch, entered by five doorways and
crowned, like the front, with a pediment. The whole was executed with
the same splendor and perfection as the other buildings of the
Acropolis, and was a worthy gateway to the group of noble monuments
which crowned that citadel of the Attic capital. The two orders were
also combined in the temple of <b>Apollo Epicurius</b> at
<b>Phigalæa</b> (Bassæ). This temple was erected in 430 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span> by Ictinus, who used the Ionic order internally
to decorate a row of projecting piers instead of free-standing columns
in the naos, in which there was also a single Corinthian column of
rather archaic design, which may have been used as a support for a
statue or votive offering.</p>


<span class="pagenum">66</span>
<a name="page66" id="page66"> </a>
<p><b>ALEXANDRIAN AGE.</b> A period of reaction followed the splendid
architectural activity of the Periclean age. A&nbsp;succession of
disastrous wars&mdash;the Sicilian, Peloponnesian, and
Corinthian&mdash;drained the energies and destroyed the peace of
European Greece for seventy-five years, robbing Athens of her supremacy
and inflicting wounds from which she never recovered. In the latter part
of the fourth century, however, the triumph of the Macedonian empire
over all the Mediterranean lands inaugurated a new era of architectural
magnificence, especially in Asia Minor. The keynote of the art of this
time was splendor, as that of the preceding age was artistic perfection.
The Corinthian order came into use, as though the Ionic were not rich
enough for the sumptuous taste of the time, and capitals and bases of
novel and elaborate design embellished the Ionic temples of Asia Minor.
In the temple of <b>Apollo Didymæus</b> at Miletus, the plinths of the
bases were made octagonal and panelled with rich scroll-carvings; and
the piers which buttressed the interior faces of the cella-walls were
given capitals of singular but elegant form, midway between the Ionic
and Corinthian types. This temple belongs to the list of colossal
edifices already referred to; its dimensions were 366 by 163 feet,
making it the largest of them all. The famous <b>Artemisium</b> (temple
of Artemis or Diana) measured 342 by 163 feet. Several of the columns of
the latter were enriched with sculptured figures encircling the lower
drums of the colossal shafts.
<span class="illustration">
<a name="fig38" id="fig38"> </a>
<img src="images/fig38.jpg" width="179" height="286"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 38.&mdash;CHORAGIC<br>
MONUMENT OF LYSICRATES.<br>
<span class="caption">
(Restored model, N.Y.)</span></span>
The most lavish expenditure was bestowed upon small structures, shrines,
and sarcophagi. The graceful monument still visible in Athens, erected
by the <ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘choraegus’">choragus</ins> Lysicrates in token of his victory in the
choral competitions, belongs to this period (330 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span><!-- invisible second . -->). It is circular,
with a slightly domical imbricated roof, and is decorated with elegant
engaged Corinthian columns (Fig. 38). In the Imperial Museum at
Constantinople are several sarcophagi of this period found at Sidon, but
<span class="pagenum">67</span>
<a name="page67" id="page67"> </a>
executed by Greek artists, and of exceptional beauty. They are in the
form of temples or shrines; the finest of them, supposed by some to have
been made for Alexander’s favorite general Perdiccas, and by others for
the Persian satrap who figures prominently on its sculptured reliefs, is
the most sumptuous work of the kind in existence. The exquisite
polychromy of its beautiful reliefs and the perfection of its rich
details of cornice, pediment, tiling, and crestings, make it an
exceedingly interesting and instructive example of the minor
architecture of the period.</p>


<p><b>THE DECADENCE.</b> After the decline of Alexandrian magnificence
Greek art never recovered its ancient glory, but the flame was not
suddenly extinguished. While in Greece proper the works of the second
and third centuries <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, are for the
most part weak and lifeless, like the <b>Stoa of Attalus</b> (175 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) and the <b>Tower of the Winds</b> (the
Clepsydra of Andronicus Cyrrhestes, 100 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) at Athens or the Portico of Philip in Delos,
there were still a few worthy works built in Asia Minor. The splendid
<b>Altar</b> erected at <b>Pergamon</b> by Eumenes II. (circ. 180 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) in the Ionic order, combined sculpture
of extraordinary vigor with imposing architecture in masterly fashion.
At <b>Aizanoi</b> an Ionic <b>Temple to Zeus</b>, by some attributed to
the Roman period, but showing rather the character of good late Greek
work, deserves mention for its elegant details, and especially for its
frieze-decoration of acanthus leaves and scrolls resembling those of a
Corinthian capital.</p>


<span class="pagenum">68</span>
<a name="page68" id="page68"> </a>

<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig39" id="fig39"> </a>
<img src="images/fig39.png" width="220" height="112"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 39.&mdash;TEMPLE OF OLYMPIAN ZEUS. ATHENS.<br>
<a class="closeup" href="images/fig39_large.png" target="_blank">
Larger View</a></p>

<p><b>ROMAN PERIOD.</b> During this period, <i>i.e.</i>, throughout the
second and first centuries <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, the
Roman dominion was spreading over Greek territory, and the structures
erected subsequent to the conquest partake of the Roman character and
mingle Roman conceptions with Greek details and <i>vice versâ</i>. The
temple of the <b>Olympian Zeus</b> at Athens (Fig. 39), a&nbsp;mighty
dipteral Corinthian edifice measuring 354 by 171 feet, standing on a
vast terrace or temenos surrounded by a buttressed wall, was begun by
Antiochus Epiphanes (170 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) on the
site of an earlier unfinished Doric temple of the time of Pisistratus,
and carried out under the direction of the Roman architect, Cossutius.
It was not, however, finally completed until the time of Hadrian, 130
<span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> Meanwhile Sulla had despoiled it
of several columns<a class="tag" name="tag12" id="tag12" href="#note12">12</a> which he carried to Rome (86 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), to use in the rebuilding of the temple of
Jupiter on the Capitol, where they undoubtedly served as models in the
development of the Roman Corinthian order. The columns were 57 feet
high, with capitals of the most perfect Corinthian type; fifteen are now
standing, and one lies prostrate near by. To the Roman period also
belong the <b>Agora Gate</b> (circ. 35 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), the <b>Arch of Hadrian</b> (117 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>), the <b>Odeon of Regilla</b> or of Herodes
Atticus (143 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>), at Athens, and
many temples and tombs, theatres, arches, etc., in the Greek
provinces.</p>


<span class="pagenum">69</span>
<a name="page69" id="page69"> </a>
<p><b>SECULAR MONUMENTS; PROPYLÆA.</b> The stately gateway by which the
Acropolis was entered has already been described. It was the noblest and
most perfect of a class of buildings whose prototype is found in the
monumental columnar porches of the palace-group at Persepolis. The
Greeks never used the arch in these structures, nor did they attach to
them the same importance as did most of the other nations of antiquity.
The Altis of Olympia, the national shrine of Hellenism, appears to have
had no central gateway of imposing size, but a number of insignificant
entrances disposed at random. The <b>Propylæa</b> of <b>Sunium</b>,
<b>Priene</b> and <b>Eleusis</b> are the most conspicuous, after those
of the Athenian Acropolis. Of these the Ionic gateway at Priene is the
finest, although the later of the two at Eleusis is interesting for its
anta-capitals. (<i>Anta</i> = a flat pilaster decorating the end of a
wing-wall and treated with a base and capital usually differing from
those of the adjacent columns.) These are of Corinthian type, adorned
with winged horses, scrolls, and anthemions of an exuberant richness of
design, characteristic of this late period.</p>


<p><b>COLONNADES, STOÆ.</b> These were built to connect public monuments
(as the Dionysiac theatre and Odeon at Athens); or along the sides of
great public squares, as at Assos and Olympia (the so-called <b>Echo
Hall</b>); or as independent open public halls, as the <b>Stoa Diple</b>
at Thoricus. They afforded shelter from sun and rain, places for
promenading, meetings with friends, public gatherings, and similar
purposes. They were rarely of great size, and most of them are of rather
late date, though the archaic structure at Pæstum, known as the
<b>Basilica</b>, was probably in reality an open hall of this kind.</p>


<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig40" id="fig40"> </a>
<img src="images/fig40.png" width="222" height="178"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 40.&mdash;PLAN OF GREEK THEATRE.</p>

<p class="caption w210">
<i>o, Orchestra; l, Logeion; p, Paraskenai; s,&nbsp;s, Stoa.</i></p>

<p class="closeup w210">
<a href="images/fig40_large.png" target="_blank">
Larger View</a></p>

<p><b>THEATRES, ODEONS.</b> These were invariably cut out of the rocky
hillsides, though in a few cases (Mantinæa, Myra, Antiphellus)
a&nbsp;part of the seats were sustained by a built-up substructure and
walls to eke out the deficiency of the hill-slope
<span class="pagenum">70</span>
<a name="page70" id="page70"> </a>
under them. The front of the excavation was enclosed by a stage and a
set scene or background, built up so as to leave somewhat over a
semicircle for the <i>orchestra</i> or space enclosed by the lower tier
of seats (Fig. 40). An altar to Dionysus (Bacchus) was the essential
feature in the foreground of the orchestra, where the Dionysiac choral
dance was performed. The seats formed successive steps of stone or
marble sweeping around the sloping excavation, with carved marble
thrones for the priests, archons, and other dignitaries. The only
architectural decoration of the theatre was that of the set scene or
<i>skene</i>, which with its wing-walls (<i>paraskenai</i>) enclosing
the stage (<i>logeion</i>) was a permanent structure of stone or marble
adorned with doors, cornices, pilasters, etc. This has perished in
nearly every case; but at Aspendus, in Asia Minor, there is one still
fairly well preserved, with a rich architectural decoration on its inner
face. The extreme diameter of the theatres varied greatly; thus at
Aizanoi it is 187 feet, and at Syracuse 495 feet. The theatre of
Dionysus at Athens (finished 325 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>)
could accommodate thirty thousand spectators.</p>

<p>The odeon differed from the theatre principally in being smaller and
entirely covered in by a wooden roof. The <b>Odeon of Regilla</b>, built
by Herodes Atticus in Athens (143 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>), is a well-preserved specimen of this class,
but all traces of its cedar ceiling and of its intermediate supports
have disappeared.</p>


<p><b>BUILDINGS FOR ATHLETIC CONTESTS.</b> These comprised stadia and
hippodromes for races, and gymnasia and
<span class="pagenum">71</span>
<a name="page71" id="page71"> </a>
palæstræ for individual exercise, bathing, and amusement. The
<i>stadia</i> and <i>hippodromes</i> were oblong enclosures surrounded
by tiers of seats and without conspicuous architectural features. The
<i>palæstra</i> or <i>gymnasium</i>&mdash;for the terms are not clearly
distinguished&mdash;was a combination of courts, chambers, tanks
(<i>piscinæ</i>) for bathers and <i>exedræ</i> or semicircular recesses
provided with tiers of seats for spectators and auditors, destined not
merely for the exercises of athletes preparing for the stadium, but also
for the instruction and diversion of the public by recitations,
lectures, and discussions. It was the prototype of the Roman thermæ, but
less imposing, more simple in plan and adornment. Every Greek city had
one or more of them, but they have almost wholly disappeared, and the
brief description by Vitruvius and scanty remains at Alexandria Troas
and Ephesus furnish almost the only information we possess regarding
their form and arrangement.</p>


<p><b>TOMBS.</b> These are not numerous, and the most important are
found in Asia Minor. The greatest of these is the famed <b>Mausoleum</b>
at Halicarnassus in Caria, the monument erected to the king Mausolus by
his widow Artemisia (354 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; Fig.
41). It was designed by Satyrus and Pythius in the Ionic style, and
comprised a podium or base 50 feet high and measuring 80 feet by 100
feet, in which was the sepulchre. Upon this base stood a cella
surrounded by thirty-six Ionic columns; and crowned by a pyramidal roof,
on the peak of which was a colossal marble quadriga at a height of 130
feet. It was superbly decorated by Scopas and other great sculptors with
statues, marble lions, and a magnificent frieze. The British Museum
possesses fragments of this most imposing monument. At Xanthus the
<b>Nereid Monument</b>, so called from its sculptured figures of
Nereides, was a somewhat similar design on a smaller scale, with sixteen
Ionic columns. At Mylassa was another tomb with an open Corinthian
colonnade supporting a roof formed
<span class="pagenum">72</span>
<a name="page72" id="page72"> </a>
in a stepped pyramid. Some of the later rock-cut tombs of Lycia at Myra
and Antiphellus may also be counted as Hellenic works.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig41" id="fig41"> </a>
<img src="images/fig41.png" width="328" height="318"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 41.&mdash;MAUSOLEUM AT HALICARNASSUS.<br>
<span class="caption">
(As restored by the author.)</span></p>


<p><b>DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURE.</b> This never attained great importance in
Greece, and our knowledge of the typical Greek house is principally
derived from literary sources. Very few remains of Greek houses have
been found sufficiently well preserved to permit of restoring even the
plan. It is probable that they resembled in general arrangement the
houses of Pompeii (see <a href="#page107">p.&nbsp;107</a>); but that
they were generally insignificant in size and decoration. The exterior
walls were pierced only by the entrance doors, all light being derived
from one or more interior courts. In the Macedonian epoch there must
have been greater display and luxury in domestic architecture, but no
remains have
<span class="pagenum">73</span>
<a name="page73" id="page73"> </a>
come down to us of sufficient importance or completeness to warrant
further discussion.</p>


<div class="monuments">

<p><b>MONUMENTS.</b> In addition to those already mentioned in the text
the following should be enumerated:</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Prehistoric Period.</span> In the Islands
about Santorin, remains of houses antedating 1500 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; at Tiryns the Acropolis, walls, and
miscellaneous ruins; the like also at Mycenæ, besides various tombs;
walls and gates at Samos, Thoricus, Menidi, Athens, etc.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Archaic Period.</span> Doric Temples at
Metapontium (by Durm assigned to 610 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), Selinus, Agrigentum, <ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘Paestum’">Pæstum</ins>; at Athens the
first Parthenon; in Asia Minor the primitive Ionic Artemisium at Ephesus
and the Heraion at Samos, the latter the oldest of colossal Greek
temples.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Transitional Period.</span> At Agrigentum,
temples of Concord, Castor and Pollux, Demeter, <ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘Aesculapius’">Æsculapius</ins>, all
circ. 480 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; temples at Selinus and
Segesta.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Periclean Period.</span> In Athens the
Ionic temple on the Illissus, destroyed during the present century; on
Cape Sunium the temple of Athena, 430 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, partly standing; at Nemea, the temple of Zeus;
at Tegea, the temple of Athena Elea (400? <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>); at Rhamnus, the temples of Themis and of
Nemesis; at Argos, two temples, stoa, and other buildings; all these
were Doric.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Alexandrian Period.</span> The temple of
Dionysus at Teos; temple of Artemis Leucophryne at Magnesia, both about
330 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span> and of the Ionic order.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Decadence and Roman Period.</span> At
Athens the Stoa of Eumenes, circ. 170 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; the monument of Philopappus on the Museum
hill, 110 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; the Gymnasium of
Hadrian, 114 to 137 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; the last two
of the Corinthian order.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Theatres.</span> Besides those already
mentioned there are important remains of theatres at Epidaurus, Argos,
Segesta, Iassus (400? <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), Delos,
Sicyon, and Thoricus; at Aizanoi, Myra, Telmissus, and Patara, besides
many others of less importance scattered through the Hellenic world. At
Taormina are extensive ruins of a large Greek theatre rebuilt in the
Roman period.</p>

</div>

<div class="footnote">

<p><a name="note11" id="note11" href="#tag11">11.</a>
See <a href="#appF">Appendix</a>, p. 427.</p>

<p><a name="note12" id="note12" href="#tag12">12.</a>
L. Bevier, in <i>Papers of the American Classical School at Athens</i>
(vol. i., pp. 195, 196), contends that these were columns left from the
old Doric temple. This is untenable, for Sulla would certainly not have
taken the trouble to carry away archaic Doric columns, with such
splendid Corinthian columns before him.</p>

</div>

<span class="pagenum">74</span>
<a name="page74" id="page74"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapVIII" id="chapVIII">CHAPTER VIII.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
ROMAN ARCHITECTURE.</h3>

<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended:</span> As before, Anderson
and Spiers, Baumeister, Reber. Choisy, <i>L’Art de bâtir chez les
Romains</i>. Desgodetz, <i>Rome in her Ancient Grandeur</i>. Durm,
<i>Die Baukunst der Etrusker</i>; <i>Die Baukunst der Romer</i>.
Lanciani, <i>Ancient Rome in the Light of Modern Discovery</i>; <i>New
Tales of Old Rome</i>; <i>Ruins and Excavations of Ancient Rome</i>. De
Martha, <i>Archéologie étrusque et romaine</i>. Middleton, <i>Ancient
Rome in 1888</i>.</p>


<p><b>LAND AND PEOPLE.</b> The geographical position of Italy conferred
upon her special and obvious advantages for taking up and carrying
northward and westward the arts of civilization. A&nbsp;scarcity of good
harbors was the only drawback amid the blessings of a glorious climate,
fertile soil, varied scenery, and rich material resources. From a remote
antiquity Dorian colonists had occupied the southern portion and the
island of Sicily, enriching them with splendid monuments of Doric art;
and Phœnician commerce had brought thither the products of Oriental art
and industry. The foundation of Rome in 753 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span> established the nucleus about which the sundry
populations of Italy were to crystallize into the Roman nation, under
the dominating influence of the Latin element. Later on, the absorption
of the conquered Etruscans added to this composite people a race of
builders and engineers, as yet rude and uncouth in their art, but
destined to become a powerful factor in developing the new architecture
that was to spring from the contact of the practical Romans with the
noble art of the Greek centres.</p>


<span class="pagenum">75</span>
<a name="page75" id="page75"> </a>
<p><b>GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS.</b> While the Greeks bequeathed to
posterity the most perfect models of form in literary and plastic art,
it was reserved for the Romans to work out the applications of these to
every-day material life. The Romans were above all things a practical
people. Their consummate skill as organizers is manifest in the
marvellous administrative institutions of their government, under which
they united the most distant and diverse nationalities. Seemingly
deficient in culture, they were yet able to recast the forms of Greek
architecture in new moulds, and to evolve therefrom a mighty
architecture adapted to wholly novel conditions. They brought
engineering into the service of architecture, which they fitted to the
varied requirements of government, public amusement, private luxury, and
the common comfort. They covered the antique world with arches and
amphitheatres, with villas, baths, basilicas, and temples, all bearing
the unmistakable impress of Rome, though wrought by artists and artisans
of divers races. Only an extraordinary genius for organization could
have accomplished such results.</p>

<p>The architects of Rome marvellously extended the range of their art,
and gave it a flexibility by which it accommodated itself to the widest
variety of materials and conditions. They made the arch and vault the
basis of their system of design, employing them on a scale previously
undreamed of, and in combinations of surpassing richness and majesty.
They systematized their methods of construction so that soldiers and
barbarians could execute the rough mass of their buildings, and
formulated the designing of the decorative details so that artisans of
moderate skill could execute them with good effect. They carried the
principle of repetition of motives to its utmost limit, and sought to
counteract any resulting monotony by the scale and splendor of the
design. Above all they developed planning into a fine art, displaying
their genius in a wonderful
<span class="pagenum">76</span>
<a name="page76" id="page76"> </a>
variety of combinations and in an unfailing sense of the demands of
constructive propriety, practical convenience, and artistic effect.
Where Egyptian or Greek architecture shows one type of plan, the Roman
shows a score.</p>


<p><b>GREEK INFLUENCE.</b> Previous to the closing years of the Republic
the Romans had no art but the Etruscan. The few buildings of importance
they possessed were of Etruscan design and workmanship, excepting a
small number built by Greek hands. It was not until the Empire that
Roman architecture took on a truly national form. True Roman
architecture is essentially imperial. The change from the primitive
Etruscan style to the splendors of the imperial age was due to the
conquest of the Greek states. Not only did the Greek campaigns enrich
Rome with an unprecedented wealth of artistic spoils; they also brought
into Italy hosts of Greek artists, and filled the minds of the
campaigners with the ambition to realize in their own dominions the
marble colonnades, the temples, theatres, and propylæa of the Greek
cities they had pillaged. The Greek orders were adopted, altered, and
applied to arcaded designs as well as to peristyles and other open
colonnades. The marriage of the column and arch gave birth to a system
of forms as characteristic of Roman architecture as the Doric or Ionic
colonnade is of the Greek.</p>


<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig42" id="fig42"> </a>
<img src="images/fig42.jpg" width="154" height="370"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 42.&mdash;ROMAN DORIC ORDER. (THEATRE OF MARCELLUS).</p>

<p><b>THE ROMAN ORDERS.</b> To meet the demands of Roman taste the
Etruscan column was retained with its simple entablature; the Doric and
Ionic were adopted in a modified form; the Corinthian was developed into
a complete and independent order, and the Composite was added to the
list. A&nbsp;regular system of proportions for all these five orders was
gradually evolved, and the mouldings were profiled with arcs of circles
instead of the subtler Greek curves. In the building of many-storied
structures the
<span class="pagenum">77</span>
<a name="page77" id="page77"> </a>
orders were superposed, the more slender over the sturdier, in an
orderly and graded succession. The immense extent and number of the
Roman buildings, the coarse materials often used, the relative scarcity
of highly trained artisans, and above all, the necessity of making a
given amount of artistic design serve for the largest possible amount of
architecture, combined to direct the designing of detail into uniform
channels. Thus in time was established a sort of canon of proportions,
which was reduced to rules by Vitruvius, and revived in much more
detailed and precise form by Vignola in the sixteenth century.</p>

<p class="illustration floatleft">
<a name="fig43" id="fig43"> </a>
<img src="images/fig43.png" width="165" height="330"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 43.&mdash;ROMAN IONIC ORDER.</p>

<p>In each of the orders, including the Doric, the column was given a
base one half of a diameter in height (the unit of measurement being the
diameter of the lower part of the shaft, the <i>crassitudo</i> of
Vitruvius). The shaft was made to contract about one-sixth in diameter
toward the capital, under which it was terminated by an <i>astragal</i>
or collar of small mouldings; at the base it ended in a slight flare and
fillet called the <i>cincture</i>. The entablature was in all cases
given not far from one quarter the height of the whole column. The
<b>Tuscan</b> order was a rudimentary or Etruscan Doric with a column
seven diameters high and a simple entablature without triglyphs,
mutules, or dentils. But few examples of its use are known. The
<b>Doric</b> (Fig. 42) retained the triglyphs and metopes, the mutules
and guttæ of the Greek; but the column was made eight diameters high,
<span class="pagenum">78</span>
<a name="page78" id="page78"> </a>
the shaft was smooth or had deep flutings separated by narrow fillets,
and was usually provided with a simple moulded base on a square plinth.
Mutules were used only over the triglyphs, and were even replaced in
some cases by dentils; the corona was made lighter than the Greek, and a
cymatium replaced the antefixæ on the lateral cornices. The Ionic
underwent fewer changes, and these principally in the smaller mouldings
and details of the capital. The column was nine diameters high (Fig.
43). The <b>Corinthian</b> was made into an independent order by the
designing of a special base of small <i>tori</i> and <i>scotiæ</i>, and
by sumptuously carved <i>modillions</i> or brackets enriching the
cornice and supporting the corona above a denticulated bed-mould (Fig.
44). Though the first designers of the modillion were probably Greeks,
it must, nevertheless, be taken as really a Roman device, worthily
completing the essentially Roman Corinthian order. The <b>Composite</b>
was formed by combining into one capital portions of the Ionic and
Corinthian, and giving to it a simplified form of the Corinthian
cornice. The Corinthian order remained, however, the favorite order of
Roman architecture.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig44" id="fig44"> </a>
<img src="images/fig44.jpg" width="247" height="405"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 44.&mdash;CORINTHIAN ORDER (TEMPLE OF CASTOR AND POLLUX).</p>

<p><b>USE OF THE ORDERS.</b> The Romans introduced many innovations in
the general use and treatment of the orders. Monolithic shafts were
preferred to those built up of superposed drums. The fluting was omitted
on these, and when hard and semi-precious stone like porphyry or
verd-antique was the material, it was highly polished to bring out its
color. These polished monoliths were often
<span class="pagenum">79</span>
<a name="page79" id="page79"> </a>
of great size, and they were used in almost incredible numbers.</p>

<p>Another radical departure from Greek usage was the mounting of
columns on pedestals to secure greater height without increasing the
size of the column and its entablature. The Greek <i>anta</i> was
developed into the Roman pilaster or flattened wall-column, and every
free column, or range of columns perpendicular to the façade, had its
corresponding pilaster to support the wall-end of the architrave. But
the most radical innovation was the general use of engaged columns as
wall-decorations or buttresses. The engaged column projected from the
wall by more than half its diameter, and was built up with the wall as a
part of its substance (Fig. 45). The entablature was in many cases
advanced only over the columns, between which it was set back almost to
the plane of the wall. This practice is open to the obvious criticism
that it makes the column appear superfluous by depriving it of its
function of supporting the continuous entablature. The objection has
less weight when the projecting entablature over the column serves as a
pedestal for a statue or
<span class="pagenum">80</span>
<a name="page80" id="page80"> </a>
similar object, which restores to the column its function as a support
(see the Arch of Constantine, <a href="#fig63">Fig. 63</a>).</p>

<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig45" id="fig45"> </a>
<img src="images/fig45.png" width="205" height="335"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 45.&mdash;ROMAN ARCADE WITH ENGAGED COLUMNS<br>
<span class="caption">
(From the Colosseum.)</span></p>

<p><b>ARCADES.</b> The orders, though probably at first used only as
free supports in porticos and colonnades, were early applied as
decorations to arcaded structures. This practice became general with the
multiplication of many-storied arcades like those of the amphitheatres,
the engaged columns being set between the arches as buttresses,
supporting entablatures which marked the divisions into stories (Fig.
45). This combination has been assailed as a false and illogical device,
but the criticism proceeds from a too narrow conception of architectural
propriety. It is defensible upon both artistic and logical grounds; for
it not only furnishes a most desirable play of light and shade and a
pleasing contrast of rectangular and curved lines, but by emphasizing
the constructive divisions and elements of the building and the vertical
support of the piers, it also contributes to the expressiveness and
vigor of the design.</p>


<p><b>VAULTING.</b> The Romans substituted vaulting in brick, concrete,
or masonry for wooden ceilings wherever possible, both in public and
private edifices. The Etruscans were
<span class="pagenum">81</span>
<a name="page81" id="page81"> </a>
the first vault-builders, and the Cloaca Maxima, the great sewer of
Republican Rome (about 500 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) still
remains as a monument of their engineering skill. Probably not only
Etruscan engineers (whose traditions were perhaps derived from Asiatic
sources in the remote past), but Asiatic builders also from conquered
eastern provinces, were engaged together in the development of the
wonderful system of vaulted construction to which Roman architecture so
largely owed its grandeur. Three types of vault were commonly used: the
barrel-vault, the groined or four-part vault, and the dome.</p>

<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig46" id="fig46"> </a>
<img src="images/fig46.png" width="154" height="141"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 46.&mdash;BARREL VAULT.</p>

<p>The barrel vault (Fig. 46) was generally semi-cylindrical in section,
and was used to cover corridors and oblong halls, like the
temple-cellas, or was bent around a curve, as in amphitheatre
passages.</p>

<p class="illustration floatleft">
<a name="fig47" id="fig47"> </a>
<img src="images/fig47.png" width="152" height="157"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 47.&mdash;GROINED VAULT.<br>
<span class="caption">
<i>g, g, Groins.</i></span></p>

<p>The groined vault is formed by the intersection of two barrel-vaults
(Fig. 47). When several compartments of groined vaulting are placed
together over an oblong plan, a&nbsp;double advantage is secured.
Lateral windows can be carried up to the full height of the vaulting
instead of being stopped below its springing; and the weight and thrust
of the vaulting are concentrated upon a number of isolated points
instead of being exerted along the whole extent of the side walls, as
with the barrel-vault. The Romans saw that it was sufficient to dispose
the masonry at these points in masses at right angles to the length of
the hall, to best resist the lateral
<span class="pagenum">82</span>
<a name="page82" id="page82"> </a>
thrust of the vault. This appears clearly in the plan of the Basilica of
Constantine (<a href="#fig58">Fig.&nbsp;58</a>).</p>

<p>The dome was in almost all Roman examples supported on a circular
wall built up from the ground, as in the Pantheon (<a href="#fig54">Fig.&nbsp;54</a>). The pendentive dome, sustained by four or
eight arches over a square or octagonal plan, is not found in true Roman
buildings.</p>

<p>The Romans made of the vault something more than a mere constructive
device. It became in their hands an element of interior effect at least
equally important with the arch and column. No style of architecture has
ever evolved nobler forms of ceiling than the groined vault and the
dome. Moreover, the use of vaulting made possible effects of
unencumbered spaciousness and amplitude which could never be compassed
by any combination of piers and columns. It also assured to the Roman
monuments a duration and a freedom from danger of destruction by fire
impossible with any wooden-roofed architecture, however noble its form
or careful its execution.</p>


<p><b>CONSTRUCTION.</b> The constructive methods of the Romans varied
with the conditions and resources of different provinces, but were
everywhere dominated by the same practical spirit. Their vaulted
architecture demanded for the support of its enormous weights and for
resistance to its disruptive thrusts, piers and buttresses of great
mass. To construct these wholly of cut stone appeared preposterous and
wasteful to the Roman. Italy abounds in clay, lime, and a volcanic
product, <i>pozzolana</i> (from Puteoli or Pozzuoli, where it has always
been obtained in large quantities), which makes an admirable hydraulic
cement. With these materials it was possible to employ unskilled labor
for the great bulk of this massive masonry, and to erect with the
greatest rapidity and in the most economical manner those stupendous
piles which, even in their ruin, excite the admiration of every
beholder.</p>


<span class="pagenum">83</span>
<a name="page83" id="page83"> </a>

<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig48" id="fig48"> </a>
<img src="images/fig48.png" width="133" height="117"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 48.&mdash;ROMAN WALL MASONRY.</p>

<p class="caption w150">
<i>a, Brickwork; b, Tufa ashlar; r, Opus reticulatum; i, Opus
incertum.</i></p>

<p><b>STONE, CONCRETE, AND BRICK MASONRY.</b> For buildings of an
externally decorative character such as temples, arches of triumph, and
amphitheatres, as well as in all places where brick and concrete were
not easily obtained, stone was employed. The walls were built by laying
up the inner and outer faces in <i>ashlar</i> or cut stone, and filling
in the intermediate space with rubble (random masonry of uncut stone)
laid up in cement, or with concrete of broken stone and cement dumped
into the space in successive layers. The cement converted the whole into
a conglomerate closely united with the face-masonry. In Syria and Egypt
the local preference for stones of enormous size was gratified, and even
surpassed, as in Herod’s terrace-walls for the temple at Jerusalem (<a
href="#page41">p.&nbsp;41</a>), and in the splendid structures of
Palmyra and Baalbec. In Italy, however, stones of moderate size were
preferred, and when blocks of unusual dimensions occur, they are in many
cases marked with false joints, dividing them into apparently smaller
blocks, lest they should dwarf the building by their large scale. The
general use in the Augustan period of marble for a decorative lining or
wainscot in interiors led in time to the objectionable practice of
coating buildings of concrete with an apparel of sham marble masonry, by
carving false joints upon an external veneer of thin slabs of that
material. Ordinary concrete walls were frequently faced with small
blocks of tufa, called, according to the manner of its application,
<i>opus reticulatum</i>, <i>opus incertum</i>, <i>opus spicatum</i>,
etc. (Fig. 48). In most cases, however, the facing was of carefully
executed brickwork, covered sometimes by a coating of stucco. The bricks
were large, measuring from one to two feet square where used for quoins
or arches, but triangular
<span class="pagenum">84</span>
<a name="page84" id="page84"> </a>
where they served only as facings. Bricks were also used in the
construction of skeleton ribs for concrete vaults of large span.</p>


<p><b>VAULTING.</b> Here, as in the wall-masonry, economy and common
sense devised methods extremely simple for accomplishing vast designs.
While the smaller vaults were, so to speak, cast in concrete upon moulds
made of rough boards, the enormous weight of the larger vaults precluded
their being supported, while drying or “setting,” upon timber centrings
built up from the ground. Accordingly, a&nbsp;skeleton of light ribs was
first built on wooden centrings, and these ribs, when firmly “set,”
became themselves supports for intermediate centrings on which to cast
the concrete fillings between the ribs. The whole vault, once hardened,
formed really a monolithic curved lintel, exerting no thrust whatever,
so that the extraordinary precautions against lateral disruption
practised by the Romans were, in fact, in many cases quite
superfluous.</p>


<p><b>DECORATION.</b> The temple of Castor and Pollux in the Forum (long
miscalled the temple of <ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘Jupitor’">Jupiter</ins> Stator), is a typical example of Roman
architectural decoration, in which richness was preferred to the subtler
refinements of design (see <a href="#fig44">Fig.&nbsp;44</a>). The
splendid figure-sculpture which adorned the Greek monuments would have
been inappropriate on the theatres and thermæ of Rome or the provinces,
even had there been the taste or the skill to produce it. Conventional
carved ornament was substituted in its place, and developed into a
splendid system of highly decorative forms. Two principal elements
appear in this decoration&mdash;the acanthus-leaf, as the basis of a
whole series of wonderfully varied motives; and symbolism, represented
principally by what are technically termed
<i>grotesques</i>&mdash;incongruous combinations of natural forms, as
when an infant’s body terminates in a bunch of foliage (Fig. 49). Only
to a limited extent do we find true sculpture employed as
<span class="pagenum">85</span>
<a name="page85" id="page85"> </a>
decoration, and that mainly for triumphal arches or memorial
columns.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig49" id="fig49"> </a>
<img src="images/fig49.jpg" width="422" height="230"
alt="see caption"><br>
FIG. 49&mdash;ROMAN CARVED ORNAMENT.<br>
<span class="caption">
(Lateran Museum.)</span></p>

<p>The architectural mouldings were nearly always carved, the Greek
water-leaf and egg-and-dart forming the basis of most of the
enrichments; but these were greatly elaborated and treated with more
minute detail than the Greek prototypes. Friezes and bands were commonly
ornamented with the foliated scroll or <i>rinceau</i> (a&nbsp;convenient
French term for which we have no equivalent). This motive was as
characteristic of Roman art as the anthemion was of the Greek. It
consists of a continuous stem throwing out alternately on either side
branches which curl into spirals and are richly adorned with rosettes,
acanthus-leaves, scrolls, tendrils, and blossoms. In the best examples
the detail was modelled with great care and minuteness, and the motive
itself was treated with extraordinary variety and fertility of
invention. A&nbsp;derived and enriched form of the anthemion was
sometimes used for bands and friezes; and grotesques, dolphins,
griffins, infant genii, wreaths,
<span class="pagenum">86</span>
<a name="page86" id="page86"> </a>
festoons, ribbons, eagles, and masks are also common features in Roman
relief carving.</p>

<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig50" id="fig50"> </a>
<img src="images/fig50.png" width="187" height="260"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 50.&mdash;ROMAN CEILING PANELS.<br>
<span class="caption">
(<i>a</i>, From Palmyra; <i>b</i>, Basilica of Constantine.)</span></p>

<p>The Romans made great use of panelling and of moulded plaster in
their interior decoration, especially for ceilings. The panelling of
domes and vaults was usually roughly shaped in their first construction
and finished afterward in stucco with rich moulding and rosettes. The
panels were not always square or rectangular, as in Greek ceilings, but
of various geometric forms in pleasing combinations (Fig. 50). In works
of a small scale the panels and decorations were wrought in relief in a
heavy coating of plaster applied to the finished structure, and these
stucco reliefs are among the most refined and charming products of Roman
art. (Baths of Titus; Baths at Pompeii; Palace of the Cæsars and tombs
at Rome.)</p>

<p>
<b>COLOR DECORATION.</b> Plaster was also used as a ground for painting,
executed in distemper or by the encaustic process, wax liquefied by a hot iron
being the medium for applying the color in the latter case. Pompeii and
Herculaneum furnish countless examples of brilliant wall-painting in which
strong primary colors form the ground, and a semi-naturalistic, semi-fantastic
representation of figures, architecture and landscape is mingled with festoons,
vines, and purely conventional ornament. Mosaic was also employed to decorate
floors and wall-spaces, and sometimes for ceilings.<a class="tag" name="tag13"
href="#note13">13</a> The later imperial baths and palaces were especially
<span class="pagenum">87</span>
<a name="page87" id="page87"> </a>
rich in mosaic of the kind called opus Grecanicum, executed with
numberless minute cubes of stone or glass, as in the Baths of Caracalla
and the Villa of Hadrian at Tivoli.</p>

<p>To the walls of monumental interiors, such as temples, basilicas, and
thermæ, splendor of color was given by veneering them with thin slabs of
rare and richly colored marble. No limit seems to have been placed upon
the costliness or amount of these precious materials. Byzantine
architecture borrowed from this practice its system of interior color
decoration.</p>

<p class="footnote">
<a name="note13" id="note13" href="#tag13">13.</a>
See Van Dyke’s <i>History of Paintings</i>, p.&nbsp;33.</p>




<span class="pagenum">88</span>
<a name="page88" id="page88"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapIX" id="chapIX">CHAPTER IX.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
ROMAN ARCHITECTURE&mdash;<i>Continued</i>.</h3>

<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: Same as for Chapter
VIII. Also, Guhl and Kohner, <i>Life of the Ancient Greeks and
Romans</i>. Adams, <i>Ruins of the Palace of <ins class="correction"
title="text reads ‘Spalatro’">Spalato</ins></i>. Burn, <i>Rome and the
Campagna</i>. Cameron, <i>Roman Baths</i>. Mau, tr. by Kelcey,
<i>Pompeii, its Life and Art</i>. Mazois, <i>Ruines de Pompeii</i>. Von
Presuhn, <i>Die neueste Ausgrabungen zu Pompeii</i>. Wood, <i>Ruins of
Palmyra and Baalbec</i>.</p>


<p><b>THE ETRUSCAN STYLE.</b> Although the first Greek architects were
employed in Rome as early as 493 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>,
the architecture of the Republic was practically Etruscan until nearly
100 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span> Its monuments, consisting
mainly of city walls, tombs, and temples, are all marked by a general
uncouthness of detail, denoting a lack of artistic refinement, but they
display considerable constructive skill. In the Etruscan walls we meet
with both polygonal and regularly coursed masonry; in both kinds the
true arch appears as the almost universal form for gates and openings.
A&nbsp;famous example is the Augustan Gate at Perugia, a&nbsp;late work
rebuilt about 40 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, but thoroughly
Etruscan in style. At Volaterræ (Volterra) is another arched gate, and
in Perugia fragments of still another appear built into the modern
walls.</p>

<p>The Etruscans built both structural and excavated tombs; they
consisted in general of a single chamber with a slightly arched or
gabled roof, supported in the larger tombs on heavy square piers. The
interiors were covered with pictures; externally there was little
ornament except about the gable and doorway. The latter
<span class="pagenum">89</span>
<a name="page89" id="page89"> </a>
had a stepped or moulded frame with curious <i>crossettes</i> or ears
projecting laterally at the top. The gable recalled the wooden roofs of
Etruscan temples, but was coarse in detail, especially in its mouldings.
Sepulchral monuments of other types are also met with, such as
<i>cippi</i> or memorial pillars, sometimes in groups of five on a
single pedestal (tomb at Albano).</p>

<p>Among the temples of Etruscan style that of <b>Jupiter
Capitolinus</b> on the Capitol at Rome, destroyed by fire in 80 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, was the chief. Three narrow chambers
side by side formed a cella nearly square in plan, preceded by a
hexastyle porch of huge Doric, or rather Tuscan, columns arranged in
three aisles, widely spaced and carrying ponderous wooden architraves.
The roof was of wood; the cymatium and ornaments, as well as the statues
in the pediment, were of terra-cotta, painted and gilded. The details in
general showed acquaintance with Greek models, which appeared in debased
and awkward imitations of triglyphs, cornices, antefixæ, etc.</p>


<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig51" id="fig51"> </a>
<img src="images/fig51.png" width="154" height="283"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 51.&mdash;TEMPLE FORTUNA VIRILIS. PLAN.</p>

<p><b>GREEK STYLE.</b> The victories of Marcellus at Syracuse, 212 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, Fabius Maximus at Tarentum (209 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), Flaminius (196 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), Mummius (146 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), Sulla (86 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), and others in the various Greek provinces,
steadily increased the vogue of Greek architecture and the number of
Greek artists in Rome. The temples of the last two centuries <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, and some of earlier date, though still
Etruscan in plan, were in many cases strongly Greek in the character of
their details. A&nbsp;few have remained to our time in tolerable
preservation. The temple of <b>Fortuna
<span class="pagenum">90</span>
<a name="page90" id="page90"> </a>
Virilis</b> (really of Fors Fortuna), of the second century (?) <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, is a tetrastyle prostyle
pseudoperipteral temple with a high <i>podium</i> or base,
a&nbsp;typical Etruscan cella, and a deep porch, now walled up, but
thoroughly Greek in the elegant details of its Ionic order (Fig. 51).
Two circular temples, both called erroneously <b>Temples of Vesta</b>,
one at Rome near the Cloaca Maxima, the other at Tivoli, belong among
the monuments of Greek style. The first was probably dedicated to
Hercules, the second probably to the Sibyls; the latter being much the
better preserved of the two. Both were surrounded by peristyles of
eighteen Corinthian columns, and probably covered by domical roofs with
gilded bronze tiles. The Corinthian order appears here complete with its
modillion cornice, but the crispness of the detail and the fineness of
the execution are Greek and not Roman. These temples date from about 72
<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, though the one at Rome was
probably rebuilt in the first century <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> (Fig. 52).</p>

<p class="illustration floatleft w210">
<a name="fig52" id="fig52"> </a>
<img src="images/fig52.png" width="208" height="398"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 52.&mdash;CIRCULAR TEMPLE. TIVOLI.</p>


<p><b>IMPERIAL ARCHITECTURE; AUGUSTAN AGE.</b> Even in the temples of
Greek style Roman conceptions of plan and composition are dominant. The
Greek architect was not free to reproduce textually Greek designs or
details, however strongly he might impress with the Greek character
whatever he touched. The demands of imperial splendor
<span class="pagenum">91</span>
<a name="page91" id="page91"> </a>
and the building of great edifices of varied form and complex structure,
like the thermæ and amphitheatres, called for new adaptations and
combinations of planning and engineering. The reign of Augustus (27
<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>-14 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>) inaugurated the imperial epoch, but many works
erected before and after his reign properly belong to the Augustan age
by right of style. In general, we find in the works of this period the
happiest combination of Greek refinement with Roman splendor. It was in
this period that Rome first assumed the aspect of an opulent and
splendid metropolis, though the way had been prepared for this by the
regularization and adornment of the Roman Forum and the erection of many
temples, basilicas, fora, arches, and theatres during the generation
preceding the accession of Augustus. His reign saw the inception or
completion of the portico of Octavia, the Augustan forum, the Septa
Julia, the first Pantheon, the adjoining Thermæ of Agrippa, the theatre
of Marcellus, the first of the imperial palaces on the Palatine, and a
long list of temples, including those of the Dioscuri (Castor and
Pollux), of Mars Ultor, of Jupiter Tonans on the Capitol, and others in
the provinces; besides colonnades, statues, arches, and other
embellishments almost without number.</p>


<p><b>LATER IMPERIAL WORKS.</b> With the successors of Augustus splendor
increased to almost fabulous limits, as, for instance, in the vast
extent and the prodigality of ivory and gold in the famous Golden House
of Nero. After the great fire in Rome, presumably kindled by the agents
of this emperor, a&nbsp;more regular and monumental system of
street-planning and building was introduced, and the first municipal
building-law was decreed by him. To the reign of Vespasian (68&ndash;79
<span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>) we owe the rebuilding in Roman
style and with the Corinthian order of the temple of Jupiter
Capitolinus, the Baths of Titus, and the beginning of the Flavian
amphitheatre or Colosseum. The two last-named
<span class="pagenum">92</span>
<a name="page92" id="page92"> </a>
edifices both stood on the site of Nero’s Golden House, of which the
greater part was demolished to make way for them. During the last years
of the first century the arch of Titus was erected, the Colosseum
finished, amphitheatres built at Verona, Pola, Reggio, Tusculum, Nîmes
(France), Constantine (Algiers), Pompeii and Herculanum (these last two
cities and Stabiæ rebuilt after the earthquake of 63 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>), and arches, bridges, and temples erected all
over the Roman world.</p>

<p>The first part of the second century was distinguished by the
splendid architectural achievements of the reign of Hadrian
(117&ndash;138 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>) in Rome and the
provinces, especially Athens. Nearly all his works were marked by great
dignity of conception as well as beauty of detail. During the latter
part of the century a very interesting series of buildings were erected
in the Hauran (Syria), in which Greek and Arab workmen under Roman
direction produced examples of vigorous stone architecture of a mingled
Roman and Syrian character.</p>

<p>The most-remarkable thermæ of Rome belong to the third
century&mdash;those of Caracalla (211&ndash;217 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>) and of Diocletian (284&ndash;305 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>)&mdash;their ruins to-day ranking among the
most imposing remains of antiquity. In Syria the temples of the Sun at
Baalbec and Palmyra (273 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>, under
Aurelian), and the great palace of Diocletian at Spalato, in Dalmatia
(300 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>), are still the wonder of
the few travellers who reach those distant spots.</p>

<p>While during the third and fourth centuries there was a marked
decline in purity and refinement of detail, many of the later works of
the period display a remarkable freedom and originality in conception.
But these works are really not Roman, they are foreign, that is,
provincial products; and the transfer of the capital to Byzantium
revealed the increasing degree in which Rome was coming to look to the
East for her strength and her art.</p>


<span class="pagenum">93</span>
<a name="page93" id="page93"> </a>
<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig53" id="fig53"> </a>
<img src="images/fig53.png" width="262" height="439"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 53.&mdash;TEMPLE OF VENUS AND ROME. PLAN.</p>

<p><b>TEMPLES.</b> The Romans built both rectangular and circular
temples, and there was much variety in their treatment. In the
rectangular temples a high <i>podium</i>, or basement, was substituted
for the Greek stepped stylobate, and the prostyle plan was more common
than the peripteral. The cella was relatively short and wide, the front
porch inordinately deep, and frequently divided by longitudinal rows of
columns into three aisles. In most cases the exterior of the cella in
prostyle temples was decorated by engaged columns. A&nbsp;barrel vault
gave the interior an aspect of spaciousness impossible with the Greek
system of a wooden ceiling supported on double ranges of columns. In the
place of these, free or engaged columns along the side-walls received
the ribs of the vaulting. Between these ribs the ceiling was richly
panelled, or coffered and sumptuously gilded. The temples of <b>Fortuna
Virilis</b> and of <b>Faustina</b> at Rome (the latter built 141 <span
class="smallroman">A.D.</span>, and its ruins incorporated into the
modern church of S.&nbsp;Lorenzo in Miranda), and the beautiful and
admirably preserved <b>Maison
<span class="pagenum">94</span>
<a name="page94" id="page94"> </a>
Carrée</b>, at Nîmes (France) (4&nbsp;<span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>) are examples of this type. The temple of
<b>Concord</b>, of which only the podium remains, and the small temple
of Julius (both of these in the Forum) illustrate another form of
prostyle temple in which the porch was on a long side of the cella. Some
of the larger temples were peripteral. The temple of the <b>Dioscuri</b>
(Castor and Pollux) in the Forum, was one of the most magnificent of
these, certainly the richest in detail (<a href="#fig44">Fig.&nbsp;44</a>). Very remarkable was the double temple of
<b>Venus and Rome</b>, east of the Forum, designed by the Emperor
Hadrian about 130 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> (Fig. 53). It
was a vast pseudodipteral edifice containing two cellas in one
structure, their statue-niches or apses meeting back to back in the
centre. The temple stood in the midst of an imposing columnar peribolus
entered by magnificent gateways. Other important temples have already
been mentioned on <a href="#page91">p.&nbsp;91</a>.</p>

<p>Besides the two circular temples already described, the temple of
Vesta, adjoining the House of the Vestals, at the east end of the Forum
should be mentioned. At Baalbec is a circular temple whose entablature
curves inward between the widely-spaced columns until it touches the
cella in the middle of each intercolumniation. It illustrates the
caprices of design which sometimes resulted from the disregard of
tradition and the striving after originality (273 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>).</p>


<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig54" id="fig54"> </a>
<img src="images/fig54.png" width="162" height="243"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 54.&mdash;PLAN OF THE PANTHEON.</p>

<p><b>THE PANTHEON.</b> The noblest of all circular temples of Rome and
of the world was the <b>Pantheon</b>. It was built by Hadrian,
117&ndash;138 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>, on the site of the
earlier rectangular temple of the same name erected by Agrippa. It
measures 142 feet in diameter
<span class="pagenum">95</span>
<a name="page95" id="page95"> </a>
internally; the wall is 20 feet thick and supports a hemispherical dome
rising to a height of 140 feet (Figs. 54, 55). Light is admitted solely
through a round opening 28 feet in diameter at the top of the dome, the
simplest and most impressive method of illumination conceivable.
The rain and snow that enter produce no appreciable effect upon the
temperature of the vast hall. There is a single entrance, with noble
bronze doors, admitting directly to the interior, around which seven
niches, alternately rectangular and semicircular in plan and fronted by
Corinthian columns, lighten, without weakening, the mass of the
encircling wall. This wall was originally incrusted with rich marbles,
and the great dome, adorned with deep coffering in rectangular panels,
was decorated with rosettes and mouldings in gilt stucco. The dome
appears to have been composed of numerous arches and ribs, filled in and
finally coated with concrete. A&nbsp;recent examination of a denuded
portion of its inner surface has convinced the writer that the interior
panelling was executed after, and not during, its construction, by
hewing the panels out of the mass of brick and concrete, without regard
to the form and position of the origin skeleton of ribs.</p>

<p class="illustration floatleft">
<a name="fig55" id="fig55"> </a>
<img src="images/fig55.jpg" width="263" height="311"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 55.&mdash;INTERIOR OF THE PANTHEON.</p>

<p>The exterior (Fig. 56) was less successful than the interior.
<span class="pagenum">96</span>
<a name="page96" id="page96"> </a>
The gabled porch of twelve superb granite columns 50 feet high,
three-aisled in plan after the Etruscan mode, and covered originally by
a ceiling of bronze, was a rebuilding with the materials and on the plan
of the original pronaos of the Pantheon of Agrippa. The circular wall
behind it is faced with fine brickwork, and displays, like the dome,
many curious arrangements of discharging arches, reminiscences of
traditional constructive precautions here wholly useless and fictitious
because only skin-deep. A&nbsp;revetment of marble below and plaster
above once concealed this brick facing. The portico, in spite of its too
steep gable (once filled with a “gigantomachia” in gilt bronze) and its
somewhat awkward association with a round building, is nevertheless a
noble work, its capitals in Pentelic marble ranking among the finest
known examples of the Roman Corinthian. Taken as a whole, the Pantheon
is one of the great masterpieces of the world’s architecture.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig56" id="fig56"> </a>
<img src="images/fig56.jpg" width="428" height="273"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 56.&mdash;EXTERIOR OF THE PANTHEON.<br>
<span class="caption">
(From model in Metropolitan Museum, New York.<!-- invisible .
-->)</span></p>


<span class="pagenum">97</span>
<a name="page97" id="page97"> </a>

<p><b>FORA AND BASILICAS.</b> The fora were the places for general
public assemblage. The chief of those in Rome, the <b>Forum Magnum</b>,
or <b>Forum Romanum</b>, was at first merely an irregular vacant space,
about and in which, as the focus of the civic life, temples, halls,
colonnades, and statues gradually accumulated. These chance aggregations
the systematic Roman mind reduced in time to orderly and monumental
form; successive emperors extended them and added new fora at enormous
cost and with great splendor of architecture. Those of Julius, Augustus,
Vespasian, and Nerva (or Domitian), adjoining the Roman Forum, were
magnificent enclosures surrounded by high walls and single or double
colonnades. Each contained a temple or basilica, besides gateways,
memorial columns or arches, and countless statues. The <b>Forum of
Trajan</b> surpassed all the rest; it covered an area of thirty-five
thousand square yards, and included, besides the main area, entered
through a triumphal arch, the Basilica Ulpia, the temple of Trajan, and
his colossal Doric column of Victory. Both in size and beauty it ranked
as the chief architectural glory of the city (Fig. 57). The six fora
together contained thirteen temples, three basilicas, eight triumphal
arches, a&nbsp;mile of porticos, and a number of other public
edifices.<a class="tag" name="tag14" id="tag14" href="#note14">14</a> Besides
<span class="pagenum">98</span>
<a name="page98" id="page98"> </a>
these, a&nbsp;net-work of colonnades covered large tracts of the city,
affording sheltered communication in every direction, and here and there
expanding into squares or gardens surrounded by peristyles.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig57" id="fig57"> </a>
<img src="images/fig57.png" width="253" height="344"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 57.&mdash;FORUM AND BASILICA OF TRAJAN.<br>
<a class="closeup" href="images/fig57_large.png" target="_blank">
Larger View</a></p>

<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig58" id="fig58"> </a>
<img src="images/fig58.png" width="148" height="131"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 58.&mdash;BASILICA OF CONSTANTINE. PLAN.</p>

<p>The public business of Rome, both judicial and commercial, was
largely transacted in the <i>basilicas</i>, large buildings consisting
usually of a wide and lofty central nave flanked by lower side-aisles,
and terminating at one or both ends in an apse or semicircular recess
called the <i>tribune</i>, in which were the seats for the magistrates.
The side-aisles were separated from the nave by columns supporting a
clearstory wall, pierced by windows above the roofs of the side-aisles.
In some cases the latter were two stories high, with galleries; in
others the central space was open to the sky, as at Pompeii, suggesting
the derivation of the basilica from the open square surrounded by
colonnades, or from the forum itself, with which we find it usually
associated. The most important basilicas in Rome were the
<b>Sempronian</b>, the <b>Æmilian</b> (about 54 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), the <b>Julian</b> in the Forum Magnum (51
<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), and the <b>Ulpian</b> in the
Forum of Trajan (113 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>). The last
two were probably open basilicas, only the side-aisles being roofed. The
Ulpian (Fig. 57) was the most magnificent of all, and in conjunction
with the Forum of Trajan formed one of the most imposing of those
monumental aggregations of columnar architecture which contributed so
largely to the splendor of the Roman capital.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig59" id="fig59"> </a>
<img src="images/fig59.jpg" width="430" height="315"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 59.&mdash;BASILICA OF CONSTANTINE.<!-- invisible . --> RUINS.</p>

<p>These monuments frequently suffered from the burning of their wooden
roofs. It was Constantine who completed the first vaulted and fireproof
basilica, begun by his predecessor and rival, Maxentius, on the site of
the former Temple of Peace (Figs. 58, 59). Its design reproduced on a
<span class="pagenum">99</span>
<a name="page99" id="page99"> </a>
grand scale the plan of the tepidarium-halls of the thermæ, the
side-recesses of which were converted into a continuous side-aisle by
piercing arches through the buttress-walls that separated them. Above
the imposing vaults of these recesses and under the cross-vaults of the
nave were windows admitting abundant light. A&nbsp;<i>narthex</i>, or
porch, preceded the hall at one end; there were also a side entrance
from the Via Sacra, and an apse or tribune for the magistrates opposite
each of these entrances. The dimensions of the main hall (325 × 85
feet), the height of its vault (117 feet), and the splendor of its
columns and incrustations excited universal admiration, and exercised a
powerful influence on later architecture.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig60" id="fig60"> </a>
<img src="images/fig60.png" width="240" height="174"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 60.&mdash;THERMÆ OF CARACALLA. PLAN OF CENTRAL BLOCK.</p>

<p class="caption w240">
<i>A, Caldarium, or Hot Bath; B, Intermediate Chamber; C, Tepidarium, or
Warm Bath; D, Frigidarium, or Cold Bath; E, Peristyles; a, Gymnastic
Rooms; b, Dressing Rooms; c, Cooling Rooms; d, Small Courts; e,
Entrances; v, Vestibules.</i></p>

<p class="closeup w240">
<a href="images/fig60_large.png" target="_blank">
Larger View</a></p>

<p><b>THERMÆ.</b> The leisure of the Roman people was largely spent in
the great baths, or <i>thermæ</i>, which took the place substantially of
the modern club. The establishments
<span class="pagenum">100</span>
<a name="page100" id="page100"> </a>
erected by the emperors for this purpose were vast and complex congeries
of large and small halls, courts, and chambers, combined with a masterly
comprehension of artistic propriety and effect in the sequence of
oblong, square, oval, and circular apartments, and in the relation of
the greater to the lesser masses. They were a combination of the Greek
<i>palæstra</i> with the Roman <i>balnea</i>, and united in one
harmonious design great public swimming-baths, private baths for
individuals and families, places for gymnastic exercises and games,
courts, peristyles, gardens, halls for literary entertainments,
lounging-rooms, and all the complex accommodation required for the
service of the whole establishment. They were built with apparent
disregard of cost, and adorned with splendid extravagance. The earliest
were the <b>Baths of Agrippa</b> (27 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) behind the Pantheon; next may be mentioned
those of <b>Titus</b>, built on the substructions of Nero’s Golden
House. The remains of the <b>Thermæ of Caracalla</b> (211 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>) form the most extensive mass of ruins in Rome,
and clearly display the admirable planning of this and similar
establishments. A&nbsp;gigantic block of buildings containing the three
great halls for cold, warm, and hot baths, stood in the centre of a vast
enclosure surrounded by private baths, <i>exedræ</i>, and halls for
lecture-audiences and other gatherings. The enclosure was adorned with
statues, flower-gardens, and places for out-door games. The <b>Baths of
Diocletian</b> (302 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>) embodied
this arrangement
<span class="pagenum">101</span>
<a name="page101" id="page101"> </a>
on a still more extensive scale; they could accommodate 3,500 bathers at
once, and their ruins cover a broad territory near the railway terminus
of the modern city. The church of S.&nbsp;Maria degli Angeli was formed
by Michael Angelo out of the <i>tepidarium</i> of these
baths&mdash;a&nbsp;colossal hall 340 × 87 feet, and 90 feet high. The
original vaulting and columns are still intact, and the whole interior
most imposing, in spite of later stucco disfigurements. The circular
<i>laconicum</i> (sweat-room) serves as the porch to the present church.
It was in the building of these great halls that Roman architecture
reached its most original and characteristic expression. Wholly
unrelated to any foreign model, they represent distinctively Roman
ideals, both as to plan and construction.</p>

<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig61" id="fig61"> </a>
<img src="images/fig61.jpg" width="250" height="178"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 61.&mdash;ROMAN THEATRE.<!-- invisible . --> (HERCULANUM.)<br>
<span class="caption">
(From model.)</span></p>


<p><b>PLACES OF AMUSEMENT.</b> The earliest Roman theatres differed from
the Greek in having a nearly semicircular plan, and in being built up
from the level ground, not excavated in a hillside (Fig. 61). The first
theatre was of wood, built by Mummius 145 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, and it was not until ninety years later that
stone was first substituted for the more perishable material, in the
theatre of Pompey. The <b>Theatre of Marcellus</b> (23&ndash;13 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span>) is in part still extant, and later
theatres in Pompeii, Orange (France), and in the Asiatic provinces are
in excellent preservation. The orchestra was not, as in the Greek
theatre, reserved for the choral dance, but was given up to spectators
of rank; the stage was adorned with a permanent architectural background
of columns and
<span class="pagenum">102</span>
<a name="page102" id="page102"> </a>
arches, and sometimes roofed with wood, and an arcade or colonnade
surrounded the upper tier of seats. The amphitheatre was a still more
distinctively Roman edifice. It was elliptical in plan, surrounding an
elliptical arena, and built up with continuous encircling tiers of
seats. The earliest stone amphitheatre was erected by Statilius Taurus
in the time of Augustus. It was practically identical in design with the
later and much larger Flavian amphitheatre, commonly known as the
<b>Colosseum</b>, begun by Vespasian and completed 82 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> (Fig. 62). This immense structure measured 607
× 506 feet in plan and was 180 feet high; it could accommodate
eighty-seven thousand spectators. Engaged columns of the Tuscan, Ionic,
and Corinthian orders decorated three stories of the exterior; the
fourth was a nearly unbroken wall with slender Corinthian pilasters.
Solidly constructed of travertine, concrete, and tufa, the Colosseum,
with its imposing but monotonous exterior, almost sublime by its scale
and seemingly endless repetition, but lacking in refinement or
originality of detail and dedicated to bloody and cruel sports, was a
characteristic product of the Roman character and civilization. At
Verona, Pola,
<span class="pagenum">103</span>
<a name="page103" id="page103"> </a>
Capua, and many cities in the foreign provinces there are well-preserved
remains of similar structures.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig62" id="fig62"> </a>
<img src="images/fig62.png" width="429" height="227"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 62.&mdash;COLOSSEUM. HALF PLAN.</p>

<p>Closely related to the amphitheatre were the circus and the stadium.
The <b>Circus Maximus</b> between the Palatine and Aventine hills was
the oldest of those in Rome. That erected by Caligula and Nero on the
site afterward partly occupied by St. Peter’s, was more splendid, and is
said to have been capable of accommodating over three hundred thousand
spectators after its enlargement in the fourth century. The long, narrow
race-course was divided into two nearly equal parts by a low parapet,
the <i>spina</i>, on which were the goals (<i>metæ</i>) and many small
decorative structures and columns. One end of the circus, as of the
stadium also, was semicircular; the other was segmental in the circus,
square in the stadium; a&nbsp;colonnade or arcade ran along the top of
the building, and the entrances and exits were adorned with monumental
arches.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig63" id="fig63"> </a>
<img src="images/fig63.jpg" width="249" height="208"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 63.&mdash;ARCH OF CONSTANTINE.<br>
<span class="caption">
(From model in Metropolitan Museum, New York.)</span></p>

<p><b>TRIUMPHAL ARCHES AND COLUMNS.</b> Rome and the provincial cities
abounded in monuments commemorative of victory, usually single or triple
arches with engaged columns and rich sculptural adornments, or single
colossal columns supporting statues. The arches were characteristic
products of Roman design, and some of them deserve high praise for the
excellence of their proportions and the elegance of their details. There
were in Rome in the second century <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>, thirty-eight of these monuments. The <b>Arch
of Titus</b> (71&ndash;82 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>) is the
simplest and most perfect of those still extant in Rome; the arch of
<b>Septimius Severus</b> in the Forum (203 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>) and that of <b>Constantine</b> (330 <span
class="smallroman">A.D.</span>) near the Colosseum, are more sumptuous
but less pure in detail. The last-named was in part enriched with
sculptures taken from the earlier arch of Trajan. The statues of Dacian
captives on the attic (<i>attic</i> = a species of subordinate story
added above the main cornice) of this arch were a fortunate addition,
furnishing a <i>raison-d’être</i>
<span class="pagenum">104</span>
<a name="page104" id="page104"> </a>
for the columns and broken entablatures on which they rest. Memorial
columns of colossal size were erected by several emperors, both in Rome
and abroad. Those of <b>Trajan</b> and of <b>Marcus Aurelius</b> are
still standing in Rome in perfect preservation. The first was 140 feet
high including the pedestal and the statue which surmounted it; its
capital marked the height of the ridge levelled by the emperor for the
forum on which the column stands. Its most striking peculiarity is the
spiral band of reliefs winding around the shaft from bottom to top and
representing the Dacian campaigns of Trajan. The other column is of
similar design and dimensions, but greatly inferior to the first in
execution. Both are really towers, with interior stair-cases leading to
the top.</p>


<p><b>TOMBS.</b> The Romans developed no special and national type of
tomb, and few of their sepulchral monuments were of large dimensions.
The most important in Rome were the pyramid of <b>Caius Cestius</b>
(late first century <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), and the
circular tombs of <b>Cecilia Metella</b> (60 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), <b>Augustus</b> (14 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>) and <b>Hadrian</b>, now the Castle of
S.&nbsp;Angelo (138 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>). The latter
was composed of a huge cone of marble supported on a cylindrical
structure 230 feet in diameter standing on a square podium 300 feet long
and wide. The cone probably once terminated in the gilt bronze pine-cone
now in the Giardino della Pigna of the Vatican. In the Mausoleum of
Augustus a mound of earth planted with trees
<span class="pagenum">105</span>
<a name="page105" id="page105"> </a>
crowned a similar circular base of marble on a podium 220 feet square,
now buried.</p>

<p>The smaller tombs varied greatly in size and form. Some were vaulted
chambers, with graceful internal painted decorations of figures and vine
patterns combined with low-relief enrichments in stucco. Others were
designed in the form of altars or sarcophagi, as at Pompeii; while
others again resembled ædiculæ, little temples, shrines, or small towers
in several stories of arches and columns, as at St. Rémy (France).</p>


<p><b>PALACES AND DWELLINGS.</b> Into their dwellings the Romans carried
all their love of ostentation and personal luxury. They anticipated in
many details the comforts of modern civilization in their furniture,
their plumbing and heating, and their utensils. Their houses may be
divided into four classes: the palace, the villa, the <i>domus</i> or
ordinary house, and the <i>insula</i> or many-storied tenement built in
compact blocks. The first three alone concern us, and will be taken up
in the above order.</p>

<p>The imperial <b>palaces</b> on the Palatine Hill comprised a wide
range in style and variety of buildings, beginning with the first simple
house of Augustus (26 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>), burnt and
rebuilt 3&nbsp;<span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> Tiberius,
Caligula, and Nero added to the Augustan group; Domitian rebuilt a
second time and enlarged the palace of Augustus, and Septimius Severus
remodelled the whole group, adding to it his own extraordinary
seven-storied palace, the Septizonium. The ruins of these successive
buildings have been carefully excavated, and reveal a remarkable
combination of dwelling-rooms, courts, temples, libraries, basilicas,
baths, gardens, peristyles, fountains, terraces, and covered passages.
These were adorned with a profusion of precious marbles, mosaics,
columns, and statues. Parts of the demolished palace of Nero were
incorporated in the substructions of the Baths of Titus. The beautiful
arabesques and plaster reliefs
<span class="pagenum">106</span>
<a name="page106" id="page106"> </a>
which adorned them were the inspiration of much of the fresco and stucco
decoration of the Italian Renaissance. At Spalato, in Dalmatia, are the
extensive ruins of the great <b>Palace of Diocletian</b>, which was laid
out on the plan of a Roman camp, with two intersecting avenues (Fig.
64). It comprised a temple, mausoleum, basilica, and other structures
besides those portions devoted to the purposes of a royal residence.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig64" id="fig64"> </a>
<img src="images/fig64.png" width="248" height="300"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 64.&mdash;PALACE OF DIOCLETIAN. SPALATO.</p>

<p>The <b>villa</b> was in reality a country palace, arranged with
special reference to the prevailing winds, exposure to the sun and
shade, and the enjoyment of a wide prospect. Baths, temples,
<i>exedræ</i>, theatres, tennis-courts, sun-rooms, and shaded porticoes
were connected with the house proper, which was built around two or
three interior courts or peristyles. Statues, fountains, and colossal
vases of marble adorned the grounds, which were laid out in terraces and
treated with all the fantastic arts of the Roman landscape-gardener. The
most elaborate and extensive villa was that of <b>Hadrian</b>, at Tibur
(Tivoli); its ruins, covering hundreds of acres, form one of the most
interesting spots to visit in the neighborhood of Rome.</p>

<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig65" id="fig65"> </a>
<img src="images/fig65.png" width="211" height="403"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 65.&mdash;HOUSE OF PANSA, POMPEII.</p>

<p class="caption w240">
<i>s, Shops; v, Vestibule; f, Family Rooms; k, Kitchen; l, Lavarium;
P,&nbsp;P,&nbsp;P, Peristyles.</i></p>

<p>There are few remains in Rome of the <b>domus</b> or private house.
Two, however, have left remarkably interesting ruins&mdash;the <b>Atrium
Vestæ</b>, or House of the Vestal Virgins,
<span class="pagenum">107</span>
<a name="page107" id="page107"> </a>
east of the Forum, a&nbsp;well-planned and extensive house surrounding a
cloister or court; and the <b>House of Livia</b>, so-called, on the
Palatine Hill, the walls and decorations of which are excellently
preserved. The typical Roman house in a provincial town is best
illustrated by the ruins of Pompeii and Herculanum, which, buried by an
eruption of Vesuvius in 79 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>, have
been partially excavated since 1721. The Pompeiian house (Fig. 65)
consisted of several courts or <i>atria</i>, some of which were
surrounded by colonnades and called <i>peristyles</i>. The front portion
was reserved for shops, or presented to the street a wall unbroken save
by the entrance; all the rooms and chambers opened upon the interior
courts, from which alone they borrowed their light. In the brilliant
climate of southern Italy windows were little needed, as sufficient
light was admitted by the door, closed only by portières for the most
part; especially as the family life was passed mainly in the shaded
courts, to which fountains, parterres of shrubbery, statues, and other
adornments lent their inviting charm. The general plan of these houses
seems to have been of Greek origin, as well as the system of decoration
used on the walls. These, when not wainscoted with
<span class="pagenum">108</span>
<a name="page108" id="page108"> </a>
marble, were covered with fantastic, but often artistic, painted
decorations, in which an imaginary architecture as of metal,
a&nbsp;fantastic and arbitrary perspective, illusory pictures, and
highly finished figures were the chief elements. These were executed in
brilliant colors with excellent effect. The houses were lightly built,
with wooden ceilings and roofs instead of vaulting, and usually with but
one story on account of the danger from earthquakes. That the
workmanship and decoration were in the capital often superior to what
was to be found in a provincial town like Pompeii, is evidenced by
beautiful wall-paintings and reliefs discovered in Rome in 1879 and now
preserved in the Museo delle Terme. More or less fragmentary remains of
Roman houses have been found in almost every corner of the Roman empire,
but nowhere exhibiting as completely as in Pompeii the typical Roman
arrangement.</p>


<p><b>WORKS OF UTILITY.</b> A word should be said about Roman
engineering works, which in many cases were designed with an artistic
sense of proportion and form which raises them into the domain of
genuine art. Such were especially the bridges, in which a remarkable
effect of monumental grandeur was often produced by the form and
proportions of the arches and piers, and an appropriate use of rough and
dressed masonry, as in the Pons Ælius (Ponte S.&nbsp;Angelo), the great
bridge at Alcantara (Spain), and the Pont du Gard, in southern France.
The aqueducts are impressive rather by their length, scale, and
simplicity, than by any special refinements of design, except where
their arches are treated with some architectural decoration to form
gates, as in the Porta Maggiore, at Rome.</p>


<p class="monuments">
<b>MONUMENTS:</b> (Those which have no important extant remains are
given in italics.) <span class="smallcaps">Temples</span>: <i>Jupiter
Capitolinus</i>, 600 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; <i>Ceres,
Liber, and Libera</i>, 494 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span> (ruins
of later rebuilding in S.&nbsp;Maria in Cosmedin); <i>first T. of
Concord</i> (rebuilt in Augustan age), 254 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; <i>first marble temple</i> in <i>portico of
Metellus</i>, by a Greek, Hermodorus, 143 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; temples of Fortune at
<span class="pagenum">109</span>
<a name="page109" id="page109"> </a>
Præneste and at Rome, and of “Vesta” at Rome, 83&ndash;78 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; of “Vesta” at Tivoli, and of Hercules at Cori,
72 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; <i>first Pantheon</i>, 27
<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span> In Augustan Age temples of
<i>Apollo</i>, Concord rebuilt, Dioscuri, <i>Julius</i>, <i>Jupiter
Stator</i>, <i>Jupiter Tonans</i>, Mars Ultor, Minerva (<i>at Rome</i>
and Assisi), Maison Carrée at Nîmes, Saturn; at Puteoli, Pola, etc.
<i>T.&nbsp;of Peace</i>; <i>T.&nbsp;Jupiter Capitolinus</i>, rebuilt 70
<span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; temple at Brescia. Temple of
Vespasian, 96 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; also <i>of
Minerva</i> in Forum of Nerva; <i>of Trajan</i>, 117 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; second Pantheon; T.&nbsp;of Venus and Rome at
Rome, and of Jupiter Olympius at Athens, 135&ndash;138 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; Faustina, 141 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; many in Syria; temples of Sun at <i>Rome</i>,
Baalbec, and Palmyra, cir. 273 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>;
of Romulus, 305 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> (porch
S.&nbsp;Cosmo and Damiano). <span class="smallcaps">Places of
Assembly</span>: <span class="smallcaps">Fora</span>&mdash;Roman,
Julian, 46 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; Augustan, 40&ndash;42
<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; <i>of Peace</i>, 75 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; Nerva, 97 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; Trajan (by Apollodorus of Damascus, 117 <ins
class="correction" title=") missing"><span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>)</ins> <span class="smallcaps">Basilicas</span>: <i>Sempronian</i>, <i>Æmilian</i>, 1st
century <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; Julian, 51 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; <i>Septa Julia</i>, 26 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; the Curia, later rebuilt by Diocletian, 300
<span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> (now Church of S.&nbsp;Adriano);
<i>at Fano</i>, 20 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> (?); Forum and
Basilica at Pompeii, 60 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; of
Trajan; of Constantine, 310&ndash;324 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> <span class="smallcaps">Theatres</span> (th.)
and <span class="smallcaps">Amphitheatres</span> (amp.): th.
<i>Pompey</i>, 55 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; of
<i>Balbus</i> and of Marcellus, 13 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; th. and amp. at Pompeii and Herculanum;
Colosseum at Rome, 78&ndash;82 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>;
th. at Orange and in Asia Minor; amp. at Albano, Constantine, Nîmes,
Petra, Pola, Reggio, Trevi, Tusculum, Verona, etc.; amp. Castrense at
Rome, 96 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> Circuses and stadia at
Rome. <span class="smallcaps">Thermæ</span>: of Agrippa, 27 <span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; <i>of Nero</i>; of Titus, 78 <span
class="smallroman">A.D.</span> <i>Domitian</i>, 90 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; Caracalla, 211 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; Diocletian, 305 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; <i>Constantine</i>, 320 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; “Minerva Medica,” 3d or 4th century <span
class="smallroman">A.D.</span> <span class="smallcaps">Arches</span>: <i>of Stertinius</i>, 196 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; <i>Scipio</i>, 190 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; <i>Augustus</i>, 30 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; Titus, 71&ndash;82 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; <i>Trajan</i>, 117 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; Severus, 203 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; Constantine, 320 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; of Drusus, Dolabella, Silversmiths, 204 <span
class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; Janus Quadrifrons, 320 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> (?); all at Rome. Others at Benevento, Ancona,
Rimini in Italy; also at Athens, and at Reims and St. Chamas in France.
Columns of Trajan, <i>Antoninus</i>, Marcus Aurelius at Rome, others at
Constantinople, Alexandria, etc. <span class="smallcaps">Tombs</span>:
along Via Appia and Via Latina, at Rome; Via Sacra at Pompeii;
tower-tombs at St. Rémy in France; rock-cut at Petra; at Rome, of Caius
Cestius and Cecilia Metella, 1st century <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>; of Augustus, 14 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; Hadrian, 138 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> <span class="smallcaps">Palaces</span> and
<span class="smallcaps">Private Houses</span>: On Palatine, of
Augustus, Tiberius, Nero, Domitian, Septimius Severus,
<i>Elagabalus</i>; Villa of Hadrian at Tivoli; palaces of Diocletian at
Spalato and <i>of Constantine</i> at Constantinople. House of Livia on
Palatine (Augustan period); of Vestals, rebuilt by Hadrian, cir. 120
<span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> Houses at Pompeii and Herculanum,
cir. 60&ndash;79 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>; Villas of
Gordianus (“Tor’ de’ Schiavi,” 240 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>), and <i>of Sallust</i> at Rome and <i>of
Pliny</i> at Laurentium.</p>

<p class="footnote">
<a name="note14" id="note14" href="#tag14">14.</a>
Lanciani: <i>Ancient Rome in the Light of Recent Discoveries</i>,
p.&nbsp;89.</p>




<span class="pagenum">110</span>
<a name="page110" id="page110"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapX" id="chapX">CHAPTER X.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
EARLY CHRISTIAN ARCHITECTURE.</h3>

<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: Bunsen, <i>Die
Basiliken christlichen Roms</i>. Butler, <i>Architecture and other Arts
in Northern Central Syria</i>. Corroyer, <i>L’architecture romane</i>.
Cummings, <i>A&nbsp;History of Architecture in Italy</i>. Essenwein
(Handbuch d. Architektur), <i>Ausgänge der klassischen Baukunst</i>.
Gutensohn u. Knapp, <i>Denkmäler <!-- missing umlaut --> der
christlichen Religion</i>. Hübsch, <i>Monuments de l’architecture
chrétienne</i>. Lanciani, <i>Pagan and Christian Rome</i>. Mothes,
<i>Die Basilikenform bei den Christen</i>, etc. Okely, <i>Development of
Christian Architecture in Italy</i>. Von Quast, <i>Die altchristlichen
Bauwerke zu Ravenna</i>. De Rossi, <i>Roma Sotterranea</i>. De Vogüé,
<i>Syrie Centrale</i>; <i>Églises de la Terre Sainte</i>.</p>


<p><b>INTRODUCTORY.</b> The official recognition of Christianity in the
year 328 by Constantine simply legalized an institution which had been
for three centuries gathering momentum for its final conquest of the
antique world. The new religion rapidly enlisted in its service for a
common purpose and under a common impulse races as wide apart in blood
and culture as those which had built up the art of imperial Rome. It was
Christianity which reduced to civilization in the West the Germanic
hordes that had overthrown Rome, bringing their fresh and hitherto
untamed vigor to the task of recreating architecture out of the decaying
fragments of classic art. So in the East its life-giving influence awoke
the slumbering Greek art-instinct to new triumphs in the arts of
building, less refined and perfect indeed, but not less sublime than
those of the Periclean age. Long before the Constantinian edict, the
Christians in the Eastern provinces had enjoyed substantial freedom of
worship. Meeting often in the private basilicas of wealthy converts, and
<span class="pagenum">111</span>
<a name="page111" id="page111"> </a>
finding these, and still more the great public basilicas, suited to the
requirements of their worship, they early began to build in imitation of
these edifices. There are many remains of these early churches in
northern Africa and central Syria.</p>


<p><b>EARLY CHRISTIAN ART IN ROME.</b> This was at first wholly
sepulchral, developing in the catacombs the symbols of the new faith.
Once liberated, however, Christianity appropriated bodily for its public
rites the basilica-type and the general substance of Roman architecture.
Shafts and capitals, architraves and rich linings of veined marble, even
the pagan Bacchic symbolism of the vine, it adapted to new uses in its
own service. Constantine led the way in architecture, endowing Bethlehem
and Jerusalem with splendid churches, and his new capital on the
Bosphorus with the first of the three historic basilicas dedicated to
the Holy Wisdom (Hagia Sophia). One of the greatest of innovators, he
seems to have had a special predilection for circular buildings, and the
tombs and baptisteries which he erected in this form, especially that
for his sister Constantia in Rome (known as Santa Costanza, Fig. 66),
furnished the prototype for numberless Italian baptisteries in later
ages.</p>

<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig66" id="fig66"> </a>
<img src="images/fig66.png" width="142" height="176"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 66.&mdash;STA. COSTANZA, ROME.</p>

<p>The Christian basilica (see Figs. 67, 68) generally comprised a broad
and lofty nave, separated by rows of columns from the single or double
side-aisles. The aisles had usually about half the width and height of
the nave, and like it were covered with wooden roofs and ceilings. Above
the columns which flanked the nave rose the lofty clearstory wall,
pierced with windows above the side-aisle roofs and supporting the
immense trusses of the roof of the nave. The timbering of
<span class="pagenum">112</span>
<a name="page112" id="page112"> </a>
the latter was sometimes bare, sometimes concealed by a richly panelled
ceiling, carved, gilded, and painted. At the further end of the nave was
the sanctuary or apse, with the seats for the clergy on a raised
platform, the <i>bema</i>, in front of which was the altar. Transepts
sometimes expanded to right and left before the altar, under which was
the <i>confessio</i> or shrine of the titular saint or martyr.</p>

<p>An <i>atrium</i> or forecourt surrounded by a covered arcade preceded
the basilica proper, the arcade at the front of the church forming a
porch or <i>narthex</i>, which, however, in some cases existed without
the atrium. The exterior was extremely plain; the interior, on the
contrary, was resplendent with incrustations of veined marble and with
sumptuous decorations in glass mosaic (called <i>opus Grecanicum</i>) on
a blue or golden ground. Especially rich were the half-dome of the apse
and the wall-space surrounding its arch and called the <i>triumphal
arch</i>; next in decorative importance came the broad band of wall
beneath the clearstory windows. Upon these surfaces the mosaic-workers
wrought with minute cubes of colored glass pictures and symbols almost
imperishable, in which the glow of color and a certain decorative
grandeur of effect in the composition went far to atone for the uncouth
drawing. With growing wealth and an increasingly elaborate ritual, the
furniture and equipments of the church assumed greater architectural
importance. A&nbsp;large rectangular space was retained for the choir in
front of the bema, and enclosed by a breast-high parapet of marble,
richly inlaid. On either side were the pulpits or <i>ambones</i> for the
Gospel and Epistle. A&nbsp;lofty canopy was built over the altar, the
<i>baldaquin</i>, supported on four marble columns. A&nbsp;few basilicas
were built with side-aisles, in two stories, as in S.&nbsp;Lorenzo and
Sta. Agnese. Adjoining the basilica in the earlier examples were the
baptistery and the tomb of the saint, circular or polygonal buildings
usually; but in later times these were replaced
<span class="pagenum">113</span>
<a name="page113" id="page113"> </a>
by the font or baptismal chapel in the church and the <i>confessio</i>
under the altar.</p>

<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig67" id="fig67"> </a>
<img src="images/fig67.png" width="234" height="116"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 67.&mdash;PLAN OF THE BASILICA OF ST.&nbsp;PAUL.</p>

<p>Of the two Constantinian basilicas in Rome, the one dedicated to
<b>St. Peter</b> was demolished in the fifteenth century; that of <b>St.
John Lateran</b> has been so disfigured by modern alterations as to be
unrecognizable. The former of the two adjoined the site of the martyrdom
of St. Peter in the circus of Caligula and Nero; it was five-aisled, 380
feet in length by 212 feet in width. The nave was 80 feet wide and 100
feet high, and the disproportionately high clearstory wall rested on
horizontal architraves carried by columns. The impressive dimensions and
simple plan of this structure gave it a majesty worthy of its rank as
the first church of Christendom. <b>St. Paul beyond the Walls</b>
(S.&nbsp;Paolo fuori le mura), built in 386 by Theodosius, resembled St.
Peter’s closely in plan (Figs. 67, 68). Destroyed by fire in 1821, it
has been rebuilt with almost its pristine splendor, and is, next to the
modern St. Peter’s and the Pantheon, the most impressive place of
worship in Rome. <b>Santa Maria Maggiore</b>,<a class="tag" name="tag15" id="tag15" href="#note15">15</a> though smaller in size, is
more interesting because it so largely retains its original aspect, its
Renaissance ceiling happily harmonizing with its simple antique lines.
Ionic columns support architraves to carry the clearstory, as in St.
Peter’s. In most other examples, St. Paul’s included, arches turned from
column to column perform this function. The first known case of such use
of classic columns as arch-bearers was in the palace of Diocletian at
Spalato; it also appears in Syrian buildings of the third and fourth
centuries&nbsp;<span class="smallroman">A.D.</span></p>

<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig68" id="fig68"> </a>
<img src="images/fig68.jpg" width="216" height="339"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 68.&mdash;ST. PAUL BEYOND THE WALLS. INTERIOR.</p>

<span class="pagenum">114</span>
<a name="page114" id="page114"> </a>
<p>The basilica remained the model for ecclesiastical architecture in
Rome, without noticeable change either of plan or detail, until the time
of the Renaissance. All the earlier examples employed columns and
capitals taken from ancient ruins, often incongruous and ill-matched in
size and order. <b>San Clemente</b> (1084) has retained almost intact
its early aspect, its choir-enclosure, baldaquin, and ambones having
been well preserved or carefully restored. Other important basilicas are
mentioned in the list of monuments on pages 118, 119.</p>


<p><b>RAVENNA.</b> The fifth and sixth centuries endowed Ravenna with a
number of notable buildings which, with the exception of the cathedral,
demolished in the last century, have been preserved to our day. Subdued
by the Byzantine emperor Justinian in 537, Ravenna became the
meeting-ground for Early Christian and Byzantine traditions and the
basilican and circular plans are both represented. The two churches
dedicated to St. Apollinaris, <b>S.&nbsp;Apollinare Nuovo</b> (520) in
the city, and <b>S.&nbsp;Apollinare in Classe</b> (538) three miles
distant from the city, in what was formerly the port, are especially
interesting for their fine mosaics, and for the impost-blocks interposed
above the capitals of their columns to receive the springing of the
pier-arches. These blocks appear to be somewhat crude modifications
<span class="pagenum">115</span>
<a name="page115" id="page115"> </a>
of the fragmentary architraves or entablatures employed in classic Roman
architecture to receive the springing of vaults sustained by columns,
and became common in Byzantine structures (<a href="#fig73">Fig.&nbsp;73</a>). The use of external arcading to give some
slight adornment to the walls of the second of the above-named churches,
and the round bell-towers of brick which adjoined both of them, were
first steps toward the development of the “wall-veil” or arcaded
decoration, and of the campaniles, which in later centuries became so
characteristic of north Italian churches (see Chapter XIII.). In Rome
the campaniles which accompany many of the mediæval basilicas are square
and pierced with many windows.</p>

<p>The basilican form of church became general in Italy, a&nbsp;large
proportion of whose churches continued to be built with wooden roofs and
with but slight deviations from the original type, long after the
appearance of the Gothic style. The chief departures from early
precedent were in the exterior, which was embellished with marble
incrustations as in S.&nbsp;Miniato (Florence); or with successive
stories of wall-arcades, as in many churches in Pisa and Lucca (see <a
href="#fig90">Fig.&nbsp;90</a>); until finally the introduction of
clustered piers, pointed arches, and vaulting, gradually transformed the
basilican into the Italian Romanesque and Gothic styles.</p>


<p><b>SYRIA AND THE EAST.</b> In Syria, particularly the central
portion, the Christian architecture of the 3d to 8th centuries produced
a number of very interesting monuments. The churches built by
Constantine in Syria&mdash;the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem
(nominally built by his mother), of the Ascension at Jerusalem, the
magnificent octagonal church on the site of the Temple, and finally the
somewhat similar church at Antioch&mdash;were the most notable Christian
monuments in Syria. The first three on the list, still extant in part at
least, have been so altered by later
<span class="pagenum">116</span>
<a name="page116" id="page116"> </a>
additions and restorations that their original forms are only
approximately known from early descriptions. They were all of large
size, and the octagonal church on the Temple platform was of exceptional
magnificence.<a class="tag" name="tag16" id="tag16" href="#note16">16</a> The columns and a part of the marble incrustations of
the early design are still visible in the “Mosque of Omar,” but most of
the old work is concealed by the decoration of tiles applied by the
Moslems, and the whole interior aspect altered by the wood-and-plaster
dome with which they replaced the simpler roof of the original.</p>

<p class="illustration floatleft w240">
<a name="fig69" id="fig69"> </a>
<img src="images/fig69.png" width="211" height="215"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 69.&mdash;CHURCH AT KALB LOUZEH.</p>

<p>Christian architecture in Syria soon, however, diverged from Roman
traditions. The abundance of hard stone, the total lack of clay or
brick, the remoteness from Rome, led to a peculiar independence and
originality in the forms and details of the ecclesiastical as well as of
the domestic architecture of central Syria. These innovations upon Roman
models resulted in the development of distinct types which, but for the
arrest of progress by the Mohammedan conquest in the seventh century,
would doubtless have inaugurated a new and independent style of
architecture. Piers of masonry came
<span class="pagenum">117</span>
<a name="page117" id="page117"> </a>
to replace the classic column, as at Tafkha (third or fourth century),
Rouheiha and Kalb Louzeh (fifth century? Fig. 69); the ceilings in the
smaller churches were often formed with stone slabs; the apse was at
first confined within the main rectangle of the plan, and was sometimes
square. The exterior assumed a striking and picturesque variety of forms
by means of turrets, porches, and gables. Singularly enough, vaulting
hardly appears at all, though the arch is used with fine effect.
Conventional and monastic groups of buildings appear early in Syria, and
that of <b>St. Simeon Stylites</b> at Kelat Seman is an impressive and
interesting monument. Four three-aisled wings form the arms of a cross,
meeting in a central octagonal open court, in the midst of which stood
the column of the saint. The eastern arm of the cross forms a complete
basilica of itself, and the whole cross measures 330 × 300 feet.
Chapels, cloisters, and cells adjoin the main edifice.</p>

<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig70" id="fig70"> </a>
<img src="images/fig70.png" width="179" height="229"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 70.&mdash;CATHEDRAL AT BOZRAH.</p>

<p>Circular and polygonal plans appear in a number of Syrian examples of
the early sixth century. Their most striking feature is the inscribing
of the circle or polygon in a square which forms the exterior outline,
and the use of four niches to fill out the corners. This occurs at Kelat
Seman in a small double church, perhaps the tomb and chapel of a martyr;
in the cathedral at <b>Bozrah</b> (Fig. 70), and in the small domical
church of <b>St. George</b> at <b>Ezra</b>. These were probably the
prototypes of many Byzantine churches like St. Sergius at
Constantinople, and San Vitale at Ravenna (<a href="#fig74">Fig.&nbsp;74</a>), though the exact dates of the Syrian
<span class="pagenum">118</span>
<a name="page118" id="page118"> </a>
churches are not known. The one at Ezra is the only one of the three
which has a dome, the others having been roofed with wood.</p>

<p>The interesting domestic architecture of this period is preserved in
whole towns and villages in the Hauran, which, deserted at the Arab
conquest, have never been reoccupied and remain almost intact but for
the decay of their wooden roofs. They are marked by dignity and
simplicity of design, and by the same picturesque massing of gables and
roofs and porches which has already been remarked of the churches. The
arches are broad, the columns rather heavy, the mouldings few and
simple, and the scanty carving vigorous and effective, often strongly
Byzantine in type.</p>

<p>Elsewhere in the Eastern world are many early churches of which even
the enumeration would exceed the limits of this work. Salonica counts a
number of basilicas and several domical churches. The church of <b>St.
George</b>, now a mosque, is of early date and thoroughly Roman in plan
and section, of the same class with the Pantheon and the tomb of Helena,
in both of which a massive circular wall is lightened by eight niches.
At Angora (Ancyra), Hierapolis, Pergamus, and other points in Asia
Minor; in Egypt, Nubia, and Algiers, are many examples of both circular
and basilican edifices of the early centuries of Christianity. In
Constantinople there remains but a single representative of the
basilican type, the church of <b>St. John Studius</b>, now the Emir
Akhor mosque.</p>

<p class="monuments">
<b>MONUMENTS</b>: <span class="smallcaps">Rome</span>: 4th century:
St. Peter’s, Sta. Costanza, 330?; Sta. Pudentiana, 335 (rebuilt 1598);
tomb of St. Helena; Baptistery of Constantine; St. Paul’s beyond the
Walls, 386; St. John Lateran (wholly remodelled in modern times). 5th
century: Baptistery of St. John Lateran; Sta. Sabina, 425; Sta. Maria
Maggiore, 432; S.&nbsp;Pietro in Vincoli, 442 (greatly altered in modern
times). 6th century: S.&nbsp;Lorenzo, 580 (the older portion in two
stories); SS. Cosmo e Damiano. 7th century: Sta. Agnese, 625;
S.&nbsp;Giorgio in Velabro, 682. 8th century: Sta. Maria in
<span class="pagenum">119</span>
<a name="page119" id="page119"> </a>
Cosmedin; S.&nbsp;Crisogono. 9th century: S.&nbsp;Nereo ed Achilleo;
Sta. Prassede; Sta. Maria in Dominica. 12th and 13th centuries:
S.&nbsp;Clemente, 1118; Sta. Maria in Trastevere; S.&nbsp;Lorenzo
(nave); Sta. Maria in Ara Coeli. <span class="smallcaps">Ravenna</span>: Baptistery of S.&nbsp;John, 400 (?);
S.&nbsp;Francesco; S.&nbsp;Giovanni Evangelista, 425; Sta. Agata, 430;
S.&nbsp;Giovanni Battista, 439; tomb of Galla Placidia, 450;
S.&nbsp;Apollinare Nuovo, 500&ndash;520; S.&nbsp;Apollinare in Classe,
538; St. Victor; Sta. Maria in Cosmedin (the Arian Baptistery); tomb of
Theodoric (Sta. Maria della Rotonda, a&nbsp;decagonal two-storied
mausoleum, with a low dome cut from a single stone 36 feet in diameter),
530&ndash;540. <span class="smallcaps">Italy in General</span>:
basilica at Parenzo, 6th century; cathedral and Sta. Fosca at Torcello,
640&ndash;700; at Naples Sta. Restituta, 7th century; others, mostly of
10th-13th centuries, at Murano near Venice, at Florence
(S.&nbsp;Miniato), Spoleto, Toscanella, etc.; baptisteries at Asti,
Florence, Nocera dei Pagani, and other places. <span class="smallcaps">In Syria and The East</span>: basilicas of the Nativity at
Bethlehem, of the Sepulchre and of the Ascension at Jerusalem; also
polygonal church on Temple platform; these all of 4th century. Basilicas
at Bakouzah, Hass, Kelat Seman, Kalb Louzeh, Rouheiha, Tourmanin, etc.;
circular churches, tombs, and baptisteries at Bozrah, Ezra, Hass, Kelat
Seman, Rouheiha, etc.; all these 4th-8th centuries. Churches at
Constantinople (Holy Wisdom, St. John Studius, etc.), Hierapolis,
Pergamus, and Thessalonica (St. Demetrius, “Eski Djuma”); in Egypt and
Nubia (Djemla, Announa, Ibreem, Siout, etc.); at Orléansville in
Algeria. (For churches, etc., of 8th-10th centuries in the West, see
Chapter XIII.)</p>

<div class="footnote">

<p><a name="note15" id="note15" href="#tag15">15.</a>
Hereafter the abbreviation S. M. will be generally used instead of the
name Santa Maria.</p>

<p><a name="note16" id="note16" href="#tag16">16.</a>
Fergusson (<i>History of Architecture</i>, vol. ii., pp. 408, 432)
contends that this was the real Constantinian church of the Holy
Sepulchre, and that the one called to-day by that name was erected by
the Crusaders in the twelfth century. The more general view is that the
latter was originally built by Constantine as the Church of the
Sepulchre, though subsequently much altered, and that the octagonal
edifice was also his work, but erected under some other name. Whether
this church was later incorporated in the “Mosque of Omar,” or merely
furnished some of the materials for its construction, is not quite
clear.</p>

</div>




<span class="pagenum">120</span>
<a name="page120" id="page120"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXI" id="chapXI">CHAPTER XI.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
BYZANTINE ARCHITECTURE.</h3>

<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before,
Essenwein, Hübsch, Von Quast. Also, Bayet, <i>L’Art Byzantin</i>.
Choisy, <i>L’Art de bâtir chez les Byzantins</i>. Lethaby and Swainson,
<i>Sancta Sophia</i>. Ongania, <i>La Basilica di San Marco</i>. Pulgher,
<i>Anciennes Églises Byzantines de Constantinople</i>. Salzenberg,
<i>Altchristliche Baudenkmäle <!--missing umlaut --> von
Constantinopel</i>. Texier and Pullan, <i>Byzantine
Architecture</i>.</p>


<p><b>ORIGIN AND CHARACTER.</b> The decline and fall of Rome arrested
the development of the basilican style in the West, as did the Arab
conquest later in Syria. It was otherwise in the new Eastern capital
founded by Constantine in the ancient Byzantium, which was rising in
power and wealth while Rome lay in ruins. Situated at the strategic
point of the natural highway of commerce between East and West,
salubrious and enchantingly beautiful in its surroundings, the new
capital grew rapidly from provincial insignificance to metropolitan
importance. Its founder had embellished it with an extraordinary wealth
of buildings, in which, owing to the scarcity of trained architects,
quantity and cost doubtless outran quality. But at least the tameness of
blindly followed precedent was avoided, and this departure from
traditional tenets contributed undoubtedly to the originality of
Byzantine architecture. A&nbsp;large part of the artisans employed in
building were then, as now, from Asia Minor and the Ægean Islands, Greek
in race if not in name. An Oriental taste for brilliant and harmonious
color and for minute decoration spread over broad
<span class="pagenum">121</span>
<a name="page121" id="page121"> </a>
surfaces must have been stimulated by trade with the Far East and by
constant contact with Oriental peoples, costumes, and arts. An Asiatic
origin may also be assigned to the methods of vaulting employed, far
more varied than the Roman, not only in form but also in materials and
processes. From Roman architecture, however, the Byzantines borrowed the
fundamental notion of their structural art; that, namely, of
distributing the weights and strains of their vaulted structures upon
isolated and massive points of support, strengthened by deep buttresses,
internal or external, as the case might be. Roman, likewise, was the use
of polished monolithic columns, and the incrustation of the piers and
walls with panels of variegated marble, as well as the decoration of
plastered surfaces by fresco and mosaic, and the use of <i>opus
sectile</i> and <i>opus Alexandrinum</i> for the production of sumptuous
marble pavements. In the first of these processes the color-figures of
the pattern are formed each of a single piece of marble cut to the shape
required; in the second the pattern is compounded of minute squares,
triangles, and curved pieces of uniform size. Under these combined
influences the artists of Constantinople wrought out new problems in
construction and decoration, giving to all that they touched a new and
striking character.</p>

<p>There is no absolute line of demarcation, chronological,
geographical, or structural, between Early Christian and Byzantine
architecture. But the former was especially characterized by the
basilica with three or five aisles, and the use of wooden roofs even in
its circular edifices; the vault and dome, though not unknown, being
exceedingly rare. Byzantine architecture, on the other hand, rarely
produced the simple three-aisled or five-aisled basilica, and nearly all
its monuments were vaulted. The dome was especially frequent, and
Byzantine architecture achieved its highest triumphs in the use of the
<i>pendentive</i>, as the triangular spherical surfaces are called, by
the aid of which a
<span class="pagenum">122</span>
<a name="page122" id="page122"> </a>
dome can be supported on the summits of four arches spanning the four
sides of a square, as explained later. There is as little uniformity in
the plans of Byzantine buildings as in the forms of the vaulting.
A&nbsp;few types of church-plan, however, predominated locally in one or
another centre; but the controlling feature of the style was the dome
and the constructive system with which it was associated. The dome, it
is true, had long been used by the Romans, but always on a circular
plan, as in the Pantheon. It is also a fact that pendentives have been
found in Syria and Asia Minor older than the oldest Byzantine examples.
But the special feature characterizing the Byzantine dome on pendentives
was its almost exclusive association with plans having piers and columns
or aisles, with the dome as the central and dominant feature of the
complex design (see plans, Figs. <a href="#fig74">74</a>, <a href="#fig75">75</a>, <a href="#fig78">78</a>). Another strictly Byzantine
practice was the piercing of the lower portion of the dome with windows
forming a circle or crown, and the final development of this feature
into a high drum.</p>


<p><b>CONSTRUCTION.</b> Still another divergence from Roman methods was
in the substitution of brick and stone masonry for concrete. Brick was
used for the mass as well as the facing of walls and piers, and for the
vaulting in many buildings mainly built of stone. Stone was used either
alone or in combination with brick, the latter appearing in bands of
four or five courses at intervals of three or four feet. In later work a
regular alternation of the two materials, course for course, was not
uncommon. In piers intended to support unusually heavy loads the stone
was very carefully cut and fitted, and sometimes tied and clamped with
iron.</p>

<p>Vaults were built sometimes of brick, sometimes of cut stone; in a
few cases even of earthenware jars fitting into each other, and laid up
in a continuous contracting spiral from the base to the crown of a dome,
as in San Vitale at
<span class="pagenum">123</span>
<a name="page123" id="page123"> </a>
Ravenna. Ingenious processes for building vaults without centrings were
made use of&mdash;processes inherited from the drain-builders of ancient
Assyria, and still in vogue in Armenia, Persia, and Asia Minor. The
groined vault was common, but always approximated the form of a dome, by
a longitudinal convexity upward in the intersecting vaults. The aisles
of Hagia Sophia<a class="tag" name="tag17" id="tag17" href="#note17">17</a> display a remarkable variety of forms in the
vaulting.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig71" id="fig71"> </a>
<img src="images/fig71.png" width="220" height="246"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 71.&mdash;DIAGRAM OF PENDENTIVES.</p>

<p><b>DOMES.</b> The dome, as we have seen, early became the most
characteristic feature of Byzantine architecture; and especially the
dome on pendentives. If a hemisphere be cut by five planes, four
perpendicular to its base and bounding a square inscribed therein, and
the fifth plane parallel to the base and tangent to the semicircular
intersections made by the first four, there will remain of the original
surface only four triangular spaces bounded by arcs of circles. These
are called <i>pendentives</i> (Fig. 71&nbsp;<i>a</i>). When these are
built up of masonry, each course forms a species of arch, by virtue of
its convexity. At the crown of the four arches on which they rest, these
courses meet and form a complete circle, perfectly stable and capable of
sustaining any superstructure that does not by excessive weight disrupt
the whole fabric by overthrowing
<span class="pagenum">124</span>
<a name="page124" id="page124"> </a>
the four arches which support it. Upon these pendentives, then,
a&nbsp;new dome may be started of any desired curvature, or even a
cylindrical drum to support a still loftier dome, as in the later
churches (Fig. 71&nbsp;<i>b</i>). This method of covering a square is
simpler than the groined vault, having no sharp edges or intersections;
it is at least as effective architecturally, by reason of its greater
height in the centre; and is equally applicable to successive bays of an
oblong, cruciform, and even columnar building. In the great cisterns at
Constantinople vast areas are covered by rows of small domes supported
on ranges of columns.</p>

<p>The earlier domes were commonly pierced with windows at the base,
this apparent weakening of the vault being compensated for by strongly
buttressing the piers between the windows, as in Hagia Sophia. Here
forty windows form a crown of light at the spring of the dome, producing
an effect almost as striking as that of the simple <i>oculus</i> of the
Pantheon, and celebrated by ancient writers in the most extravagant
terms. In later and smaller churches a high drum was introduced beneath
the dome, in order to secure, by means of longer windows, more light
than could be obtained by merely piercing the diminutive domes.</p>

<p>Buttressing was well understood by the Byzantines, whose plans were
skilfully devised to provide internal abutments, which were often
continued above the roofs of the side-aisles to prop the main vaults,
precisely as was done by the Romans in their thermæ and similar halls.
But the Byzantines, while adhering less strictly than the Romans to
traditional forms and processes, and displaying much more ready
contrivance and special adaptation of means to ends, never worked out
this pregnant structural principle to its logical conclusion as did the
Gothic architects of Western Europe a few centuries later.</p>


<p><b>DECORATION</b>. The exteriors of Byzantine buildings (except in
some of the small churches of late date) were
<span class="pagenum">125</span>
<a name="page125" id="page125"> </a>
generally bare and lacking in beauty. The interiors, on the contrary,
were richly decorated, color playing a much larger part than carving in
the designs. Painting was resorted to only in the smaller buildings, the
more durable and splendid medium of mosaic being usually preferred. This
was, as a rule, confined to the vaults and to those portions of the
wall-surfaces embraced by the vaults above their springing. The colors
were brilliant, the background being usually of gold, though sometimes
of blue or a delicate green. Biblical scenes, symbolic and allegorical
figures and groups of saints adorned the larger areas, particularly the
half-dome of the apse, as in the basilicas. The smaller vaults, the
soffits of arches, borders of pictures, and other minor surfaces,
received a more conventional decoration of crosses, monograms, and set
patterns.</p>

<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig72" id="fig72"> </a>
<img src="images/fig72.jpg" width="249" height="287"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 72.&mdash;SPANDRIL. HAGIA SOPHIA.</p>

<p>The walls throughout were sheathed with slabs of rare marble in
panels so disposed that the veining should produce symmetrical figures.
The panels were framed in billet-mouldings, derived perhaps from classic
dentils; the billets or projections on one side the moulding coming
opposite the spaces on the other. This seems to have been a purely
Byzantine feature.</p>


<p><b>CARVED DETAILS.</b> Internally the different stories were marked
by horizontal bands and cornices of white or inlaid marble richly
carved. The arch-soffits, the archivolts or
<span class="pagenum">126</span>
<a name="page126" id="page126"> </a>
bands around the arches, and the spandrils between them were covered
with minute and intricate incised carving. The motives used, though
based on the acanthus and anthemion, were given a wholly new aspect. The
relief was low and flat, the leaves sharp and crowded, and the effect
rich and lacelike, rather than vigorous. It was, however, well adapted
to the covering of large areas where general effect was more important
than detail. Even the capitals were treated in the same spirit. The
impost-block was almost universal, except where its use was rendered
unnecessary by giving to the capital itself the massive pyramidal form
required to receive properly the spring of the arch or vault. In such
cases (more frequent in Constantinople than elsewhere) the surface of
the capital was simply covered with incised carving of foliage,
basketwork, monograms, etc.; rudimentary volutes in a few cases
recalling classic traditions (Figs. 72, 73). The mouldings were weak and
poorly executed, and the vigorous profiles of classic cornices were only
remotely suggested by the characterless aggregations of mouldings which
took their place.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig73" id="fig73"> </a>
<img src="images/fig73.jpg" width="248" height="312"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 73.&mdash;CAPITAL WITH IMPOST BLOCK, S.&nbsp;VITALE.</p>


<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig74" id="fig74"> </a>
<img src="images/fig74.png" width="159" height="204"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 74.&mdash;ST. SERGIUS, CONSTANTINOPLE.</p>

<p><b>PLANS.</b> The remains of Byzantine architecture are almost
exclusively of churches and baptisteries, but the plans of these are
exceedingly varied. The first radical departure
<span class="pagenum">127</span>
<a name="page127" id="page127"> </a>
from the basilica-type seems to have been the adoption of circular or
polygonal plans, such as had usually served only for tombs and
baptisteries. The Baptistery of St. John at Ravenna (early fifth
century) is classed by many authorities as a Byzantine monument. In the
early years of the sixth century the adoption of this model had become
quite general, and with it the development of domical design began to
advance. The church of <b>St. Sergius</b> at Constantinople (Fig. 74),
originally joined to a short basilica dedicated to St. Bacchus
(afterward destroyed by the Turks), as in the double church at Kelat
Seman, was built about 520; that of <b>San Vitale</b> at Ravenna was
begun a few years later; both are domical churches on an octagonal plan,
with an exterior aisle. Semicircular niches&mdash;four in St. Sergius
and eight in San Vitale&mdash;projecting into the aisle, enlarge
somewhat the area of the central space and give variety to the internal
effect. The origin of this characteristic feature may be traced to the
eight niches of the Pantheon, through such intermediate examples as the
temple of Minerva Medica at Rome. The true pendentive does not appear in
these two churches.
<span class="illustration floatleft">
<a name="fig75" id="fig75"> </a>
<img src="images/fig75.png" width="174" height="254"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 75.&mdash;PLAN OF HAGIA SOPHIA.</span>
Timidly employed up to that time in small structures, it received a
remarkable development in the magnificent church of <b>Hagia Sophia</b>,
built by Anthemius of Tralles and Isodorus of Miletus, under Justinian,
532&ndash;538 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> In the plan of this
marvellous edifice (Fig. 75) the dome rests upon four mighty arches
bounding a square, into two of which open the half-domes of semicircular
apses. These apses are penetrated and extended each by two smaller
niches and a central arch, and the whole vast nave, measuring over 200 ×
100 feet, is flanked by
<span class="pagenum">128</span>
<a name="page128" id="page128"> </a>
enormously wide aisles connecting at the front with a majestic narthex.
Huge transverse buttresses, as in the Basilica of Constantine (with
whose structural design this building shows striking affinities), divide
the aisles each into three sections. The plan suggests that of St.
Sergius cut in two, with a lofty dome on pendentives over a square plan
inserted between the halves. Thus was secured a noble and unobstructed
hall of unrivalled proportions and great beauty, covered by a
combination of half-domes increasing in span and height as they lead up
successively to the stupendous central vault, which rises 180 feet into
the air and fitly crowns the whole. The imposing effect of this
low-curved but loftily-poised dome, resting as it does upon a crown of
windows, and so disposed that its summit is visible from every point of
the nave (as may be easily seen from an examination of the section, Fig.
76), is not surpassed in any interior ever erected.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig76" id="fig76"> </a>
<img src="images/fig76.png" width="377" height="205"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 76.&mdash;SECTION OF HAGIA SOPHIA.</p>

<a name="page131" id="page131"> </a>
<p>The two lateral arches under the dome are filled by clearstory walls
pierced by twelve windows, and resting on arcades in two stories carried
by magnificent columns taken from ancient ruins. These separate the nave
from the side-aisles, which are in two stories forming galleries, and
are vaulted with a remarkable variety of groined vaults. All the masses
are disposed with studied reference to the resistance required by the
many and complex thrusts exerted by the dome and other vaults. That the
earthquakes of one thousand three hundred and fifty years have not
destroyed the church is the best evidence of the sufficiency of these
precautions.</p>

<span class="pagenum">[129]</span>
<a name="page129" id="page129"> </a>
<a name="page130" id="page130"> </a>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig77" id="fig77"> </a>
<img src="images/fig77.jpg" width="485" height="309"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 77.&mdash;INTERIOR OF HAGIA SOPHIA, CONSTANTINOPLE.</p>

<span class="pagenum">131</span>
<p>Not less remarkable than the noble planning and construction of this
church was the treatment of scale and decoration in its interior design.
It was as conspicuously the masterpiece of Byzantine architecture as the
Parthenon was of the classic Greek. With little external beauty, it is
internally one of the most perfectly composed and beautifully decorated
halls of worship ever erected. Instead of the simplicity of the Pantheon
it displays the complexity of an organism of admirably related parts.
The division of the interior height into two stories below the spring of
the four arches, reduces the component parts of the design to moderate
dimensions, so that the scale of the whole is more easily grasped and
its vast size emphasized by the contrast. The walls are incrusted with
precious marbles up to the spring of the vaulting; the capitals,
spandrils, and soffits are richly and minutely carved with incised
ornament, and all the vaults covered with splendid mosaics. Dimmed by
the lapse of centuries and disfigured by the vandalism of the Moslems,
this noble interior, by the harmony of its coloring and its impressive
grandeur, is one of the masterpieces of all time (Fig. 77).</p>


<p><b>LATER CHURCHES.</b> After the sixth century no monuments were
built at all rivalling in scale the creations of the
<span class="pagenum">132</span>
<a name="page132" id="page132"> </a>
former period. The later churches were, with few exceptions, relatively
small and trivial. Neither the plan nor the general aspect of Hagia
Sophia seems to have been imitated in these later works. The crown of
dome-windows was replaced by a cylindrical drum under the dome, which
was usually of insignificant size. The exterior was treated more
decoratively than before, by means of bands and incrustations of colored
marble, or alternations of stone and brick; and internally mosaic
continued to be executed with great skill and of great beauty until the
tenth century, when the art rapidly declined. These later churches, of
which a number were spared by the Turks, are, therefore, generally
pleasing and elegant rather than striking or imposing.</p>


<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig78" id="fig78"> </a>
<img src="images/fig78.png" width="169" height="224"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 78.&mdash;PLAN OF ST. MARK’S, VENICE.</p>

<p><b>FOREIGN MONUMENTS.</b> The influence of Byzantine art was
wide-spread, both in Europe and Asia. The leading city of civilization
through the Dark Ages, Constantinople influenced Italy through her
political and commercial relations with Ravenna, Genoa, and Venice. The
church of <b>St. Mark</b> in the latter city was one result of this
influence (Figs. 78, 79). Begun in 1063 to replace an earlier church
destroyed by fire, it received through several centuries additions not
always Byzantine in character. Yet it was mainly the work of Byzantine
builders, who copied most probably the church of the Apostles at
Constantinople, built by Justinian. The picturesque but wholly
unstructural use of columns in the entrance porches, the upper parts of
the façade, the wooden cupolas over the five domes, and the pointed
arches in the narthex, are deviations from Byzantine traditions dating
in part from the later Middle Ages
<span class="pagenum">133</span>
<a name="page133" id="page133"> </a>
Nothing could well be conceived more irrational, from a structural point
of view, than the accumulation of columns in the entrance-arches; but
the total effect is so picturesque and so rich in color, that its
architectural defects are easily overlooked. The external veneering of
white and colored marble occurs rarely in the East, but became a
favorite practice in Venice, where it continued in use for five hundred
years. The interior of St. Mark’s, in some respects better preserved
than that of Hagia Sophia, is especially fine in color, though not equal
in scale and grandeur to the latter church. With its five domes it has
less unity of effect than Hagia Sophia, but more of the charm of
picturesqueness, and its less brilliant and simpler lighting enhances
the impressiveness of its more modest dimensions.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig79" id="fig79"> </a>
<img src="images/fig79.jpg" width="441" height="364"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 79.&mdash;INTERIOR OF ST. MARK’S.</p>

<span class="pagenum">134</span>
<a name="page134" id="page134"> </a>
<p>In Russia and Greece the Byzantine style has continued to be the
official style of the Greek Church. The Russian monuments are for the
most part of a somewhat fantastic aspect, the Muscovite taste having
introduced many innovations in the form of bulbous domes and other
eccentric details. In Greece there are few large churches, and some of
the most interesting, like the Cathedral at Athens, are almost toy-like
in their diminutiveness. On <b>Mt. Athos</b> (Hagion Oros) is an ancient
monastery which still retains its Byzantine character and traditions. In
Armenia (as at Ani, Etchmiadzin, etc.) are also interesting examples of
late Armeno-Byzantine architecture, showing applications to exterior
carved detail of elaborate interlaced ornament looking like a re-echo of
Celtic MSS. illumination, itself, no doubt, originating in Byzantine
traditions. But the greatest and most prolific offspring of Byzantine
architecture appeared after the fall of Constantinople (1453) in the new
mosque-architecture of the victorious Turks.</p>

<p class="monuments">
<b>MONUMENTS.</b> <span class="smallcaps">Constantinople</span>: St.
Sergius, 520; Hagia Sophia, 532&ndash;538; Holy Apostles by Justinian
(demolished); Holy Peace (St. Irene) originally by Constantine, rebuilt
by Justinian, and again in 8th century by Leo the Isaurian; Hagia
Theotokos, 12th century (?); Monétes Choras (“Kahiré Djami”), 10th
century; Pantokrator; “Fetiyeh Djami.” Cisterns, especially the “Bin Bir
Direk” (1,001 columns) and “Yere Batan Serai;” palaces, few vestiges
except the great hall of the Blachernæ palace. <span class="smallcaps">Salonica</span>: Churches&mdash;of Divine Wisdom (“Aya
Sofia”) St. Bardias, St. Elias. <span class="smallcaps">Ravenna</span>: San Vitale, 527&ndash;540. <span class="smallcaps">Venice</span>: St. Mark’s, 977&ndash;1071; “Fondaco dei
Turchi,” now Civic Museum, 12th century. Other churches at Athens and
Mt. Athos; at Misitra, Myra, Ancyra, Ephesus, etc.; in Armenia at Ani,
Dighour, Etchmiadzin, Kouthais, Pitzounda, Usunlar, etc.; tombs at Ani,
Varzhahan, etc.; in Russia at Kieff (St. Basil, Cathedral), Kostroma,
Moscow (Assumption, St. Basil, Vasili Blaghennoi, etc.), Novgorod,
Tchernigoff; at Kurtea Darghish in Wallachia, and many other places.</p>

<p class="footnote">
<a name="note17" id="note17" href="#tag17">17.</a>
“St. Sophia,” the common name of this church, is a misnomer. It was not
dedicated to a saint at all, but to the Divine Wisdom (Hagia Sophia),
which name the Turks have retained in the softened form “Aya Sofia.”</p>




<span class="pagenum">135</span>
<a name="page135" id="page135"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXII" id="chapXII">CHAPTER XII.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
SASSANIAN AND MOHAMMEDAN ARCHITECTURE.</h3>

<h3 class="subsub">
(ARABIAN, MORESQUE, PERSIAN, INDIAN, AND TURKISH.)</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: Bourgoin, <i>Les
Arts Arabes</i>. Coste, <i>Monuments du Caire</i>; <i>Monuments modernes
de la Perse</i>. Cunningham, <i>Archæological Survey of India</i>.
Fergusson, <i>Indian and Eastern Architecture</i>. De Forest, <i>Indian
Architecture and Ornament</i>. Flandin et Coste, <i>Voyage en Perse</i>.
Franz-Pasha, <i>Die Baukunst des Islam</i>. Gayet, <i>L’Art Arabe</i>;
<i>L’Art Persan</i>. Girault de Prangey, <i>Essai sur l’architecture des
Arabes en Espagne</i>, etc. Goury and Jones, <i>The Alhambra</i>. Jacob,
<i>Jeypore Portfolio of Architectural Details</i>. Le Bon, <i>La
civilisation des Arabes</i>; <i>Les monuments de l’Inde</i>. Owen Jones,
<i>Grammar of Ornament</i>. Parvillée, <i>L’Architecture Ottomane</i>.
Prisse d’Avennes, <i>L’Art Arabe</i>. Texier, <i>Description de
l’Arménie, la Perse</i>, etc.</p>


<p><b>GENERAL SURVEY.</b> While the Byzantine Empire was at its zenith,
the new faith of Islam was conquering Western Asia and the Mediterranean
lands with a fiery rapidity, which is one of the marvels of history. The
new architectural styles which grew up in the wake of these conquests,
though differing widely in conception and detail in the several
countries, were yet marked by common characteristics which set them
quite apart from the contemporary Christian styles. The predominance of
decorative over structural considerations, a&nbsp;predilection for
minute surface-ornament, the absence of pictures and sculpture, are
found alike in Arabic, Persian, Turkish, and Indian buildings, though in
varying degree. These new styles, however, were almost entirely the
handiwork of artisans belonging to the
<span class="pagenum">136</span>
<a name="page136" id="page136"> </a>
conquered races, and many traces of Byzantine, and even after the
Crusades, of Norman and Gothic design, are recognizable in Moslem
architecture. But the Orientalism of the conquerors and their common
faith, tinged with the poetry and philosophic mysticism of the Arab,
stamped these works of Copts, Syrians, and Greeks with an unmistakable
character of their own, neither Byzantine nor Early Christian.</p>


<p><b>ARABIC ARCHITECTURE.</b> In the building of mosques and tombs,
especially at Cairo, this architecture reached a remarkable degree of
decorative elegance, and sometimes of dignity. It developed slowly, the
Arabs not being at the outset a race of builders. The early monuments of
Syria and Egypt were insignificant, and the sacred <i>Kaabah</i> at
Mecca and the mosque at Medina hardly deserve to be called architectural
monuments at all. The most important early works were the mosques of
<b>’Amrou</b> at Cairo (642, rebuilt and enlarged early in the eighth
century), of <b>El Aksah</b> on the Temple platform at Jerusalem (691,
by Abd-el-Melek), and of <b>El Walid</b> at Damascus (705&ndash;732,
recently seriously injured by fire). All these were simple one-storied
structures, with flat wooden roofs carried on parallel ranges of columns
supporting pointed arches, the arcades either closing one side of a
square court, or surrounding it completely. The long perspectives of the
aisles and the minute decoration of the archivolts and ceilings alone
gave them architectural character. The beautiful <b>Dome of the Rock</b>
(Kubbet-es-Sakhrah, miscalled the Mosque of Omar) on the Temple platform
at Jerusalem is either a remodelled Constantinian edifice, or in large
part composed of the materials of one (see <a href="#page116">p.&nbsp;116</a>).</p>

<p>The splendid mosque of <b>Ibn Touloun</b> (876&ndash;885) was built
on the same plan as that of Amrou, but with cantoned piers instead of
columns and a corresponding increase in variety of perspective and
richness of effect. With the incoming
<span class="pagenum">137</span>
<a name="page137" id="page137"> </a>
of the Fatimite dynasty, however, and the foundation of the present city
of Cairo (971), vaulting began to take the place of wooden ceilings, and
then appeared the germs of those extraordinary applications of geometry
to decorative design which were henceforth to be the most striking
feature of Arabic ornament. Under the Ayûb dynasty, which began with
Salâh-ed-din (Saladin) in 1172, these elements, of which the great
<b>Barkouk</b> mosque (1149) is the most imposing early example,
developed slowly in the domical tombs of the <i>Karafah</i> at Cairo,
and prepared the way for the increasing richness and splendor of a long
series of mosques, among which those of <b>Kalaoun</b>
(1284&ndash;1318), <b>Sultan Hassan</b> (1356), <b>El Mu’ayyad</b>
(1415), and <b>Kaîd Bey</b> (1463), were the most conspicuous examples
(Fig. 80). They mark, indeed, successive advances in complexity of
planning, ingenuity of construction, and elegance of decoration.
Together they constitute an epoch in Arabic architecture, which
coincides closely with the development of Gothic
<span class="pagenum">138</span>
<a name="page138" id="page138"> </a>
vaulted architecture in Europe, both in the stages and the duration of
its advances.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig80" id="fig80"> </a>
<img src="images/fig80.jpg" width="265" height="440"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 80.&mdash;MOSQUE OF SULTAN HASSAN, CAIRO: SANCTUARY.<br>
<span class="caption">
<i>a, Mihrâb, b, Mimber.</i></span></p>

<p>The mosques of these three centuries are, like the mediæval
monasteries, impressive aggregations of buildings of various sorts about
a central court of ablutions. The tomb of the founder, residences for
the <i>imams</i>, or priests, schools (<i>madrassah</i>), and hospitals
(<i>mâristân</i>) rival in importance the prayer-chamber. This last is,
however, the real focus of interest and splendor; in some cases, as in
Sultan Hassan, it is a simple barrel-vaulted chamber open to the court;
in others an oblong arcaded hall with many small domes; or again,
a&nbsp;square hall covered with a high pointed dome on pendentives of
intricately beautiful stalactite-work (see below). The ceremonial
requirements of the mosque were simple. The-court must have its fountain
of ablutions in the centre. The prayer-hall, or mosque proper, must have
its <i>mihrâb</i>, or niche, to indicate the <i>kibleh</i>, the
direction of Mecca; and its <i>mimber</i>, or high, slender pulpit for
the reading of the Kôran. These were the only absolutely indispensable
features of a mosque, but as early as the ninth century the
<i>minaret</i> was added, from which the call to prayer could be sounded
over the city by the <i>mueddin</i>. Not until the Ayubite period,
however, did it begin to assume those forms of varied and picturesque
grace which lend to Cairo so much of its architectural charm.</p>


<p><b>ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS.</b> While Arabic architecture, in Syria and
Egypt alike, possesses more decorative than constructive originality,
the beautiful forms of its domes, pendentives, and minarets, the simple
majesty of the great pointed barrel-vaults of the Hassan mosque and
similar monuments, and the graceful lines of the universally used
pointed arch, prove the Coptic builders and their later Arabic
successors to have been architects of great ability. The Arabic domes,
as seen both in the mosques and in the remarkable group of tombs
commonly called “tombs of the
<span class="pagenum">139</span>
<a name="page139" id="page139"> </a>
Khalîfs,” are peculiar not only in their pointed outlines and their rich
external decoration of interlaced geometric motives, but still more in
the external and internal treatment of the pendentives, exquisitely
decorated with stalactite ornament. This ornament, derived, no doubt,
from a combination of minute corbels with rows of small niches, and
presumably of Persian origin, was finally developed into a system of
extraordinary intricacy, applicable alike to the topping of a niche or
panel, as in the great doorways of the mosques, and to the bracketing
out of minaret galleries (Figs. 81, <a href="#fig82">82</a>). Its
applications show a bewildering variety of forms and an extraordinary
aptitude for intricate geometrical design.</p>

<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig81" id="fig81"> </a>
<img src="images/fig81.jpg" width="257" height="342"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 81.&mdash;MOSQUE OF KAÎD BEY, CAIRO.</p>


<p><b>DECORATION.</b> Geometry, indeed, vied with the love of color in
its hold on the Arabic taste. Ceiling-beams were carved into highly
ornamental forms before receiving their rich color-decoration of red,
green, blue, and gold. The doors and the <i>mimber</i> were framed in
geometric patterns with slender intersecting bars forming complicated
star-panelling. The voussoirs of arches were cut into curious
interlocking forms; doorways and niches were covered with stalactite
corbelling, and pavements and wall-incrustations,
<span class="pagenum">140</span>
<a name="page140" id="page140"> </a>
whether of marble or tiling, combined brilliancy and harmony of color
with the perplexing beauty of interlaced star-and-polygon patterns of
marvellous intricacy. Stained glass added to the interior color-effect,
the patterns being perforated in plaster, with a bit of colored glass
set into each perforation&mdash;a&nbsp;device not very durable, perhaps,
but singularly decorative.</p>


<p><b>OTHER WORKS.</b> Few of the mediæval Arabic palaces have remained
to our time. That they were adorned with a splendid prodigality appears
from contemporary accounts. This splendor was internal rather than
external; the palace, like all the larger and richer dwellings in the
East, surrounded one or more courts, and presented externally an almost
unbroken wall. The fountain in the chief court, the <i>diwân</i>
(a&nbsp;great, vaulted reception-chamber opening upon the court and
raised slightly above it), the <i>dâr</i>, or men’s court, rigidly
separated from the <i>hareem</i> for the women, were and are universal
elements in these great dwellings. The more common city-houses show as
their most striking features successively corbelled-out stories and
broad wooden eaves, with lattice-screens covering single windows, or
almost a whole façade, composed of turned work (<i>mashrabiyya</i>), in
designs of great beauty.</p>

<p>The fountains, gates, and minor works of the Arabs display the same
beauty in decoration and color, the same general forms and details which
characterize the larger works, but it is impossible here to
particularize further with regard to them.</p>


<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig82" id="fig82"> </a>
<img src="images/fig82.jpg" width="249" height="487"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 82.&mdash;MOORISH DETAIL, ALHAMBRA.</p>

<p class="caption w240">
<i>Showing stalactite and perforated work, Moorish cusped arch,
Hispano-Moresque capitals, and decorative inscriptions.</i></p>

<p><b>MORESQUE.</b> Elsewhere in Northern Africa the Arabs produced no
such important works as in Egypt, nor is the architecture of the other
Moslem states so well preserved or so well known. Constructive design
would appear to have been there even more completely subordinated to
decoration; tiling and plaster-relief took the place of more
architectural elements and materials, while horseshoe and cusped
<span class="pagenum">141</span>
<a name="page141" id="page141"> </a>
arches were substituted for the simpler and more architectural pointed
arch (Fig. 82). The courts of palaces and public buildings were
surrounded by ranges of horseshoe arches on slender columns; these last
being provided with capitals of a form rarely seen in Cairo. Towers were
built of much more massive design than the Cairo minarets, usually with
a square, almost solid shaft and a more open lantern at the top,
sometimes in several diminishing stories.</p>


<p><b>HISPANO-MORESQUE.</b> The most splendid phase of this branch of
Arabic architecture is found not in Africa but in Spain, which was
overrun in 710&ndash;713 by the Moors, who established there the
independent Khalifate of Cordova. This was later split up into petty
kingdoms, of which the most important were Granada, Seville, Toledo, and
Valencia. This dismemberment of the Khalifate led in time to the loss of
these cities, which were one by one recovered by the Christians during
the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries;
<span class="pagenum">142</span>
<a name="page142" id="page142"> </a>
the capture of Granada, in 1492, finally destroying the Moorish
rule.</p>

<p>The dominion of the Moors in Spain was marked by a high civilization
and an extraordinary activity in building. The style they introduced
became the national style in the regions they occupied, and even after
the expulsion of the Moors was used in buildings erected by Christians
and by Jews. The “House of Pilate,” at Seville, is an example of this,
and the general use of the Moorish style in Jewish synagogues, down to
our own day, both in Spain and abroad, originated in the erection of
synagogues for the Jews in Spain by Moorish artisans and in Moorish
style, both during and after the period of Moslem supremacy.</p>

<p>Besides innumerable mosques, castles, bridges, aqueducts, gates, and
fountains, the Moors erected several monuments of remarkable size and
magnificence. Specially worthy of notice among them are the Great Mosque
at Cordova, the Alcazars of Seville and Malaga, the Giralda at Seville,
and the Alhambra at Granada.</p>

<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig83" id="fig83"> </a>
<img src="images/fig83.jpg" width="245" height="363"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 83.&mdash;INTERIOR OF THE GREAT MOSQUE AT CORDOVA.</p>

<p>The <b>Mosque at Cordova</b>, begun in 786 by ‘Abd-er-Rahman,
enlarged in 876, and again by El Mansour in 976, is a vast arcaded hall
375 feet × 420 feet in extent, but only 30
<span class="pagenum">143</span>
<a name="page143" id="page143"> </a>
feet high (Fig. 83). The rich wooden ceiling rests upon seventeen rows
of thirty to thirty-three columns each, and two intersecting rows of
piers, all carrying horseshoe arches in two superposed ranges,
a&nbsp;large portion of those about the sanctuary being cusped, the
others plain, except for the alternation of color in the voussoirs. The
<i>mihrâb</i> niche is particularly rich in its minutely carved
incrustations and mosaics, and a dome ingeniously formed by intersecting
ribs covers the sanctuary before it. This form of dome occurs frequently
in Spain.</p>

<p>The <b>Alcazars</b> at Seville and Malaga, which have been restored
in recent years, present to-day a fairly correct counterpart of the
castle-palaces of the thirteenth century. They display the same general
conceptions and decorative features as the Alhambra, which they
antedate. The <b>Giralda</b> at Seville is, on the other hand, unique.
It is a lofty rectangular tower, its exterior panelled and covered with
a species of quarry-ornament in relief; it terminated originally in two
or three diminishing stages or lanterns, which were replaced in the
sixteenth century by the present Renaissance belfry.</p>

<p>The <b>Alhambra</b> is universally considered to be the masterpiece
of Hispano-Moresque art, partly no doubt on account of its excellent
preservation. It is most interesting as an example of the splendid
citadel-palaces built by the Moorish conquerors, as well as for its
gorgeous color-decoration of minute quarry-ornament stamped or moulded
in the wet plaster wherever the walls are not wainscoted with tiles. It
was begun in 1248 by Mohammed-ben-Al-Hamar, enlarged in 1279 by his
successor, and again in 1306, when its mosque was built. Its plan (Fig.
84) shows two large courts and a smaller one next the mosque, with three
great square chambers and many of minor importance. Light arcades
surround the Court of the Lions with its fountain, and adorn the ends of
the other chief court; and the stalactite
<span class="pagenum">144</span>
<a name="page144" id="page144"> </a>
pendentive, rare in Moorish work, appears in the “Hall of Ambassadors”
and some other parts of the edifice. But its chief glory is its
ornamentation, less durable, less architectural than that of the Cairene
buildings, but making up for this in delicacy and richness. Minute
vine-patterns and Arabic inscriptions are interwoven with waving
intersecting lines, forming a net-like framework, to all of which deep
red, blue, black, and gold give an indescribable richness of effect.</p>

<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig84" id="fig84"> </a>
<img src="images/fig84.png" width="273" height="222"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 84.&mdash;PLAN OF THE ALHAMBRA.</p>

<p class="caption w270">
<i>A, Hall of Ambassadors; a, Mosque; b, Court of Mosque; c, Sala della
Barca; d,&nbsp;d, Baths; e, Hall of the Two Sisters; f,&nbsp;f,&nbsp;f,
Hall of the Tribunal; g, Hall of the Abencerrages.</i></p>

<p class="closeup w270">
<a href="images/fig84_large.png" target="_blank">
Larger View</a></p>

<p>The Moors also overran Sicily in the eighth century, but while their
architecture there profoundly influenced that of the Christians who
recovered Sicily in 1090, and copied the style of the conquered Moslems,
there is too little of the original Moorish architecture remaining to
claim mention here.</p>


<p><b>SASSANIAN.</b> The Sassanian empire, which during the four
centuries from 226 to 641 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> had
withstood Rome and extended its own sway almost to India, left on
Persian soil a number of interesting monuments which powerfully
influenced the Mohammedan style of that region. The Sassanian buildings
appear to have been principally palaces, and were all vaulted. With
their long barrel-vaulted halls, combined with square domical chambers,
as in Firouz-Abad and Serbistan, they exhibit reminiscences of antique
Assyrian tradition.
<span class="pagenum">145</span>
<a name="page145" id="page145"> </a>
The ancient Persian use of columns was almost entirely abandoned, but
doors and windows were still treated with the banded frames and
cavetto-cornices of Persepolis and Susa. The Sassanians employed with
these exterior details others derived perhaps from Syrian and Byzantine
sources. A&nbsp;sort of engaged buttress-column and blind arches
repeated somewhat aimlessly over a whole façade were characteristic
features; still more so the huge arches, elliptical or horse-shoe
shaped, which formed the entrances to these palaces, as in the Tâk-Kesra
at Ctesiphon. Ornamental details of a debased Roman type appear, mingled
with more gracefully flowing leaf-patterns resembling early Christian
Syrian carving. The last great monument of this style was the palace at
Mashita in Moab, begun by the last Chosroes (627), but never finished,
an imposing and richly ornamented structure about 500 × 170 feet,
occupying the centre of a great court.</p>


<p><b>PERSIAN-MOSLEM ARCHITECTURE.</b> These Sassanian palaces must have
strongly influenced Persian architecture after the Arab conquest in 641.
For although the architecture of the first six centuries after that date
suffered almost absolute extinction at the hands of the Mongols under
Genghis Khan, the traces of Sassanian influence are still perceptible in
the monuments that rose in the following centuries. The dome and vault,
the colossal portal-arches, and the use of brick and tile are evidences
of this influence, bearing no resemblance to Byzantine or Arabic types.
The Moslem monuments of Persia, so far as their dates can be
ascertained, are all subsequent to 1200, unless tradition is correct in
assigning to the time of Haroun <ins class="correction" title="spelling unchanged">Ar</ins> Rashid (786) certain curious tombs near
Bagdad with singular pyramidal roofs. The ruined mosque at Tabriz
(1300), and the beautiful domical <b>Tomb</b> at <b>Sultaniyeh</b>
(1313) belong to the Mogul period. They show all the essential features
of the later architecture of the Sufis
<span class="pagenum">146</span>
<a name="page146" id="page146"> </a>
(1499&ndash;1694), during whose dynastic period were built the still
more splendid and more celebrated <b>Meidan</b> or square, the great
mosque of Mesjid Shah, the Bazaar and the College or Medress of Hussein
Shah, all at Ispahan, and many other important monuments at Ispahan,
Bagdad, and Teheran. In these structures four elements especially claim
attention; the pointed bulbous dome, the round minaret, the portal-arch
rising above the adjacent portions of the building, and the use of
enamelled terra-cotta tiles as an external decoration. To these may be
added the ogee arch (<i>ogee</i> = double-reversed curve), as an
occasional feature. The vaulting is most ingenious and beautiful, and
its forms, whether executed in brick or in plaster, are sufficiently
varied without resort to the perplexing complications of stalactite
work. In Persian decoration the most striking qualities are the harmony
of blended color, broken up into minute patterns and more subdued in
tone than in the Hispano-Moresque, and the preference of flowing lines
and floral ornament to the geometric puzzles of Arabic design. Persian
architecture influenced both Turkish and Indo-Moslem art, which owe to
it a large part of their decorative charm.</p>


<p><b>INDO-MOSLEM.</b> The Mohammedan architecture of India is so
distinct from all the native Indian styles and so related to the art of
Persia, if not to that of the Arabs, that it properly belongs here
rather than in the later chapter on Oriental styles. It was in the
eleventh century that the states of India first began to fall before
Mohammedan invaders, but not until the end of the fifteenth century that
the great Mogul dynasty was established in Hindostan as the dominant
power. During the intervening period local schools of Moslem
architecture were developing in the Pathan country of Northern India
(1193&ndash;1554), in Jaunpore and Gujerat (1396&ndash;1572), in Scinde,
where Persian influence predominated; in Kalburgah and Bidar
(1347&ndash;1426). These
<span class="pagenum">147</span>
<a name="page147" id="page147"> </a>
schools differed considerably in spirit and detail; but under the Moguls
(1494&ndash;1706) there was less diversity, and to this dynasty we owe
many of the most magnificent mosques and tombs of India, among which
those of Bijapur retain a marked and distinct style of their own.</p>

<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig85" id="fig85"> </a>
<img src="images/fig85.png" width="240" height="239"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 85.&mdash;TOMB OF MAHMUD, BIJAPUR. SECTION.</p>

<p>The Mohammedan monuments of India are characterized by a grandeur and
amplitude of disposition, a&nbsp;symmetry and monumental dignity of
design which distinguishes them widely from the picturesque but
sometimes trivial buildings of the Arabs and Moors. Less dependent on
color than the Moorish or Persian structures, they are usually built of
marble, or of marble and sandstone, giving them an air of permanence and
solidity wanting in other Moslem styles except the Turkish. The dome,
the round minaret, the pointed arch, and the colossal portal-arch, are
universal, as in Persia, and enamelled tiles are also used, but chiefly
for interior decoration. Externally the more dignified if less
resplendent decoration of surface carving is used, in patterns of minute
and graceful scrolls, leaf forms, and Arabic inscriptions covering large
surfaces. The Arabic stalactite pendentive star-panelling and
geometrical interlace are rarely if ever seen. The dome on the square
plan is almost universal, but neither the Byzantine nor the Arabic
pendentive is used, striking and original combinations of vaulting
surfaces, of corner squinches, of corbelling and ribs, being used in its
place. Many of the Pathan
<span class="pagenum">148</span>
<a name="page148" id="page148"> </a>
domes and arches at Delhi, Ajmir, Ahmedabad, Shepree, etc., are built in
horizontal or corbelled courses supported on slender columns, and exert
no thrust at all, so that they are vaults only in form, like the dome of
the Tholos of Atreus (<a href="#fig24">Fig.&nbsp;24</a>). The most
imposing and original of all Indian domes are those of the <b>Jumma
Musjid</b> and of the <b>Tomb of Mahmud</b>, both at Bijapur, the latter
137 feet in span (Fig. 85). These two monuments, indeed, with the Mogul
Taj Mahal at Agra, not only deserve the first rank among Indian
monuments, but in constructive science combined with noble proportions
and exquisite beauty are hardly, if at all, surpassed by the greatest
triumphs of western art. The Indo-Moslem architects, moreover,
especially those of the Mogul period, excelled in providing artistic
settings for their monuments. Immense platforms, superb courts, imposing
flights of steps, noble gateways, minarets to mark the angles of
enclosures, and landscape gardening of a high order, enhance greatly the
effect of the great mosques, tombs, and palaces of Agra, Delhi,
Futtehpore Sikhri, Allahabad, Secundra, etc.</p>

<p>The most notable monuments of the Moguls are the <b>Mosque of
Akbar</b> (1556&ndash;1605) at Futtehpore Sikhri, the tomb of that
sultan at Secundra, and his palace at Allahabad; the <b>Pearl Mosque</b>
at Agra and the <b>Jumma Musjid</b> at Delhi, one of the largest and
noblest of Indian mosques, both built by Shah Jehan about 1650; his
immense but now ruined palace in the same city; and finally the
unrivalled mausoleum, the <b>Taj Mahal</b> at Agra, built during his
lifetime as a festal hall, to serve as his tomb after death (Fig. 86).
This last is the pearl of Indian architecture, though it is said to have
been designed by a European architect, French or Italian. It is a white
marble structure 185 feet square, centred in a court 313 feet square,
forming a platform 18 feet high. The corners of this court are marked by
elegant minarets, and the whole is dominated by
<span class="pagenum">149</span>
<a name="page149" id="page149"> </a>
the exquisite white marble dome, 58 feet in diameter, 80 feet high,
internally rising over four domical corner chapels, and covered
externally by a lofty marble bulb-dome on a high drum. The rich
materials, beautiful execution, and exquisite inlaying of this mausoleum
are worthy of its majestic design. On the whole, in the architecture of
the Moguls in Bijapur, Agra, and Delhi, Mohammedan architecture reaches
its highest expression in the totality and balance of its qualities of
construction, composition, detail, ornament, and settings. The later
monuments show the decline of the style, and though often rich and
imposing, are lacking in refinement and originality.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig86" id="fig86"> </a>
<img src="images/fig86.jpg" width="435" height="350"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 86.&mdash;TAJ MAHAL, AGRA.</p>


<p><b>TURKISH.</b> The Ottoman Turks, who began their conquering career
under Osman&nbsp;I. in Bithynia in 1299, had for a
<span class="pagenum">150</span>
<a name="page150" id="page150"> </a>
century been occupying the fairest portions of the Byzantine empire
when, in 1453, they became masters of Constantinople. Hagia Sophia was
at once occupied as their chief mosque, and such of the other churches
as were spared, were divided between the victors and the vanquished. The
conqueror, Mehmet II., at the same time set about the building of a new
mosque, entrusting the design to a Byzantine, Christodoulos, whom he
directed to reproduce, with some modifications, the design of the “Great
Church”&mdash;Hagia Sophia. The type thus officially adopted has ever
since remained the controlling model of Turkish mosque design, so far,
at least, as general plan and constructive principles are concerned.
Thus the conquering Turks, educated by a century of study and imitation
of Byzantine models in Brusa, Nicomedia, Smyrna, Adrianople, and other
cities earlier subjugated, did what the Byzantines had, during nine
centuries, failed to do. The noble idea first expressed by Anthemius and
Isidorus in the Church of Hagia Sophia had remained undeveloped,
unimitated by later architects. It was the Turk who first seized upon
its possibilities, and developed therefrom a style of architecture less
sumptuous in color and decoration than the sister styles of Persia,
Cairo, or India, but of great nobility and dignity, notwithstanding. The
low-curved dome with its crown of buttressed windows, the plain
spherical pendentives, the great apses at each end, covered by
half-domes and penetrated by smaller niches, the four massive piers with
their projecting buttress-masses extending across the broad lateral
aisles, the narthex and the arcaded atrium in front&mdash;all these
appear in the great Turkish mosques of Constantinople. In the
Conqueror’s mosque, however, two apses with half-domes replace the
lateral galleries and clearstory of Hagia Sophia, making a perfectly
quadripartite plan, destitute of the emphasis and significance of a plan
drawn on one main axis (Fig. 87).
<span class="pagenum">151</span>
<a name="page151" id="page151"> </a>
The same treatment occurs in the mosque of Ahmed&nbsp;I., the
<b>Ahmediyeh</b> (1608; Fig. 88), and the <b>Yeni Djami</b> (“New
Mosque”) at the port (1665). In the mosque of <b>Osman III.</b> (1755)
the reverse change was effected; the mosque has no great apses, four
clearstories filling the four arches under the dome, as also in several
of the later and smaller mosques. The greatest and noblest of the
Turkish mosques, the <b>Suleimaniyeh</b>, built in 1553 by Soliman the
Magnificent, returned to the Byzantine combination of two half-domes
with two clearstories (Fig. 89).</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig87" id="fig87"> </a>
<img src="images/fig87.png" width="274" height="197"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 87.&mdash;MOSQUE OF MEHMET II.<!-- invisible . -->, CONSTANTINOPLE.
PLAN.<br>
<span class="caption">
(The dimensions figured in metres.<!-- invisible . -->)</span></p>

<p>In none of these monuments is there the internal magnificence of
marble and mosaic of the Byzantine churches. These are only in a measure
replaced by Persian tile-wainscoting and stained-glass windows of the
Arabic type. The division into stories and the treatment of scale are
less well managed than in the Hagia Sophia; on the other hand, the
proportion of height to width is generally admirable. The exterior
treatment is unique and effective, far superior to the Byzantine
practice. The massing of domes and half-domes and roofs is more
artistically arranged; and while there is little of that minute carved
detail found in Egypt and India, the composition of the lateral arcades,
the simple but impressive domical peristyles of the courts, and the
graceful forms of the pointed arches, with alternating voussoirs of
white and black marble, are artistic in a high degree. The minarets are,
however,
<span class="pagenum">152</span>
<a name="page152" id="page152"> </a>
inferior to those of Indian, Persian, and Arabic art, though graceful in
their proportions.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig88" id="fig88"> </a>
<img src="images/fig88.jpg" width="433" height="385"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 88.&mdash;EXTERIOR AHMEDIYEH MOSQUE.<!-- invisible . --></p>

<p>Nearly all the great mosques are accompanied by the domical tombs
(<i>turbeh</i>) of their imperial founders. Some of these are of noble
size and great beauty of proportion and decoration. The <b>Tomb of
Roxelana</b> (Khourrem), the favorite wife of Soliman the Magnificent
(1553), is the most beautiful of all, and perhaps the most perfect gem
of Turkish architecture, with its elegant arcade surrounding the
octagonal domical mausoleum-chamber. The <b>monumental fountains</b> of
Constantinople also deserve mention. Of these, the one erected by Ahmet
III. (1710), near Hagia
<span class="pagenum">153</span>
<a name="page153" id="page153"> </a>
Sophia, is the most beautiful. They usually consist of a rectangular
marble reservoir with pagoda-like roof and broad eaves, the four faces
of the fountain adorned each with a niche and basin, and covered with
relief carving and gilded inscriptions.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig89" id="fig89"> </a>
<img src="images/fig89.jpg" width="267" height="361"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 89.&mdash;INTERIOR OF SULEIMANIYEH,<br>
CONSTANTINOPLE.<!-- invisible . --></p>


<p><b>PALACES.</b> In this department the Turks have done little of
importance. The buildings in the Seraglio gardens are low and
insignificant. The <b>Tchinli Kiosque</b>, now the Imperial Museum, is
however, a&nbsp;simple but graceful two-storied edifice, consisting of
four vaulted chambers in the angles of a fine cruciform hall, with domes
treated like those of Bijapur on a small scale; the tiling and the
veranda in front are particularly elegant; the design suggests Persian
handiwork. The later palaces, designed by Armenians, are picturesque
white marble and stucco buildings on the water’s edge; they possess
richly decorated halls, but the details are of a debased European rococo
style, quite unworthy of an Oriental monarch.</p>

<div class="monuments">

<p><b>MONUMENTS.</b> <span class="smallcaps">Arabian</span>: “Mosque
of Omar,” or Dome of the Rock, 638; El Aksah, by ’Abd-el-Melek, 691,
both at Jerusalem; Mosque ’Amrou at Cairo, 642; mosques at Cyrene, 665;
great mosque of El Walîd,
<span class="pagenum">154</span>
<a name="page154" id="page154"> </a>
Damascus, 705&ndash;717. Bagdad built, 755. Great mosque at Kairouân,
737. At Cairo, Ibn Touloun, 876; Gama-El-Azhar, 971; Barkouk, 1149;
“Tombs of Khalîfs” (Karafah), 1250&ndash;1400; Moristan Kalaoun, 1284;
Medresseh Sultan Hassan, 1356; El Azhar enlarged; El Mûayed, 1415; Kaïd
Bey, 1463; Sinan Pacha, 1468; “Tombs of Mamelukes,” 16th century. Also
palaces, baths, fountains, mosques, and tombs. <span class="smallcaps">Moresque</span>: Mosque at Saragossa, 713; mosque and
arsenal at Tunis, 742; great mosque at Cordova, 786, 876, 975;
sanctuary, 14th century. Mosques, baths, etc., at Cordova, Tarragona,
Segovia, Toledo, 960&ndash;980; mosque of Sobeiha at Cordova, 981.
Palaces and mosques at Fez; great mosque at Seville, 1172. Extensive
building in Morocco close of 12th century. Giralda at Seville, 1160;
Alcazars in Malaga and Seville, 1225&ndash;1300; Alhambra and Generalife
at Granada, 1248, 1279, 1306; also mosques, baths, etc. Yussuf builds
palace at Malaga, 1348; palaces at Granada. <span class="smallcaps">Persian</span>: Tombs near Bagdad, 786 (?); mosque at
Tabriz, 1300; tomb of Khodabendeh at Sultaniyeh, 1313; Meidan Shah
(square) and Mesjid Shah (mosque) at Ispahan, 17th century; Medresseh
(school) of Sultan Hussein, 18th century; palaces of Chehil Soutoun
(forty columns) and Aineh Khaneh (Palace of Mirrors). Baths, tombs,
bazaars, etc., at Cashan, Koum, Kasmin, etc. Aminabad Caravanserai
between Shiraz and Ispahan; bazaar at Ispahan.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Indian</span>: Mosque and “Kutub Minar”
(tower) <i>cir.</i> 1200; Tomb of Altumsh, 1236; mosque at Ajmir,
1211&ndash;1236; tomb at Old Delhi; Adina Mosque, Maldah, 1358. Mosques
Jumma Musjid and Lal Durwaza at Jaunpore, first half of 15th century.
Mosque and bazaar, Kalburgah, 1435 (?). <!-- invisible . --> Mosques at
Ahmedabad and Sirkedj, middle 15th century. Mosque Jumma Musjid and Tomb
of Mahmûd, Bijapur, <i>cir.</i> 1550. Tomb of Humayûn, Delhi; of
Mohammed Ghaus, Gwalior; mosque at Futtehpore Sikhri; palace at
Allahabad; tomb of Akbar at Secundra, all by Akbar, 1556&ndash;1605.
Palace and Jumma Musjid at Delhi; Muti Musjid (Pearl mosque) and Taj
Mahal at Agra, by Shah Jehan, 1628&ndash;1658.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Turkish</span>: Tomb of Osman, Brusa, 1326;
Green Mosque (Yeshil Djami) Brusa, <i>cir.</i> 1350. Mosque at Isnik
(Nicæa), 1376. Mehmediyeh (mosque Mehmet II.) Constantinople, 1453;
mosque at Eyoub; Tchinli Kiosque, by Mehmet II., 1450&ndash;60; mosque
Bayazid, 1500; Selim&nbsp;I., 1520; Suleimaniyeh, by Sinan, 1553;
Ahmediyeh by Ahmet&nbsp;I., 1608; Yeni Djami, 1665; Nouri Osman, by
Osman III.<!-- invisible . -->, 1755; mosque Mohammed Ali in Cairo,
1824. Mosque at Adrianople. <span class="smallcaps">Khans</span>,
cloistered courts for public business and commercial lodgers, various
dates, 16th and 17th centuries (Validé Khan, Vizir Khan), vaulted
bazaars, fountains, Seraskierat Tower, all at Constantinople.</p>

</div>




<span class="pagenum">155</span>
<a name="page155" id="page155"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXIII" id="chapXIII">CHAPTER XIII.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
EARLY MEDIÆVAL ARCHITECTURE</h3>

<h3 class="subsub">
IN ITALY AND FRANCE.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: Cattaneo,
<i>L’Architecture en Italie</i>. Chapuy, <i>Le moyen age monumental</i>.
Corroyer, <i>Architecture romane</i>. Cummings, <i>A&nbsp;History of
Architecture in Italy</i>. Enlart, <i>Manuel d’archéologie
française</i>. Hübsch, <i>Monuments de l’architecture chrétienne</i>.
Knight, <i>Churches of Northern Italy</i>. Lenoir, <i>Architecture
monastique</i>. Osten, <i>Bauwerke in der Lombardei</i>. Quicherat,
<i>Mélanges d’histoire et d’archéologie</i>. Reber, <i>History of
Mediæval Architecture</i>. Révoil, <i>Architecture romane du midi de la
France</i>. Rohault de Fleury, <i>Monuments de Pise</i>. Sharpe,
<i>Churches of Charente</i>. De Verneilh, <i>L’Architecture byzantine en
France</i>. Viollet-le-Duc, <i>Dictionnaire raisonné de l’architecture
française</i> (especially in Vol. I., Architecture religieuse);
<i>Discourses on Architecture</i>.</p>


<p><b>EARLY MEDIÆVAL EUROPE.</b> The fall of the Western Empire in 476
<span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> marked the beginning of a new era
in architecture outside of the Byzantine Empire. The so-called Dark Ages
which followed this event constituted the formative period of the new
Western civilization, during which the Celtic and Germanic races were
being Christianized and subjected to the authority and to the educative
influences of the Church. Under these conditions a new architecture was
developed, founded upon the traditions of the early Christian builders,
modified in different regions by Roman or Byzantine influences. For Rome
recovered early her antique prestige, and Roman monuments covering the
soil of Southern Europe, were a constant
<span class="pagenum">156</span>
<a name="page156" id="page156"> </a>
object lesson to the builders of that time. To this new architecture of
the West, which in the tenth and eleventh centuries first began to
achieve worthy and monumental results, the generic name of
<b>Romanesque</b> has been commonly given, in spite of the great
diversity of its manifestations in different countries.</p>


<p><b>CHARACTER OF THE ARCHITECTURE.</b> Romanesque architecture was
pre-eminently ecclesiastical. Civilization and culture emanated from the
Church, and her requirements and discipline gave form to the builder’s
art. But the basilican style, which had so well served her purposes in
the earlier centuries and on classic soil, was ill-suited to the new
conditions. Corinthian columns, marble incrustations, and splendid
mosaics were not to be had for the asking in the forests of Gaul or
Germany, nor could the Lombards and Ostrogoths in Italy or their
descendants reproduce them. The basilican style was complete in itself,
possessing no seeds of further growth. The priests and monks of Italy
and Western Europe sought to rear with unskilled labor churches of stone
in which the general dispositions of the basilica should reappear in
simpler, more massive dress, and, as far as possible, in a fireproof
construction with vaults of stone. This problem underlies all the varied
phases of Romanesque architecture; its final solution was not, however,
reached until the Gothic period, to which the Romanesque forms the
transition and stepping-stone.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig90" id="fig90"> </a>
<img src="images/fig90.jpg" width="432" height="263"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 90.&mdash;INTERIOR OF SAN AMBROGIO, MILAN.</p>

<p><b>MEDIÆVAL ITALY.</b> Italy in the Dark Ages stood midway between
the civilization of the Eastern Empire and the semi-barbarism of the
West. Rome, Ravenna, and Venice early became centres of culture and
maintained continuous commercial relations with the East. Architecture
did not lack either the inspiration or the means for advancing on new
lines. But its advance was by no means the same everywhere. The unifying
influence of the church was
<span class="pagenum">157</span>
<a name="page157" id="page157"> </a>
counterbalanced by the provincialism and the local diversities of the
various Italian states, resulting in a wide variety of styles. These,
however, may be broadly grouped in four divisions: the <b>Lombard</b>,
the <b>Tuscan-Romanesque</b>, the <b>Italo-Byzantine</b>, and the
unchanged <b>Basilican</b> or Early Christian, which last, as was shown
in Chapter&nbsp;X., continued to be practised in Rome throughout the
Middle Ages.</p>


<p class="illustration floatleft null">
<a name="fig91" id="fig91"> </a>
<img class="null" src="images/fig91a.jpg"
width="100" height="246" alt="see caption and text"></p>

<p class="illustration floatleft">
<img src="images/fig91b.jpg" width="269" height="332"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 91.&mdash;WEST FRONT AND CAMPANILE<br>
OF CATHEDRAL, PIACENZA.</p>

<p><b>LOMBARD STYLE.</b> Owing to the general rebuilding of ancient
churches under the more settled social conditions of the eleventh and
twelfth centuries, little remains to us of the architecture of the three
preceding centuries in Italy, except the Roman basilicas and a few
baptisteries and circular churches, already mentioned in Chapter&nbsp;X.
The so-called Lombard monuments belong mainly to the eleventh and
twelfth centuries. They are found not only in Lombardy, but also in
Venetia and the Æmilia. Milan, Pavia, Piacenza, Bologna, and Verona were
important centres of development of this style. The churches were nearly
all vaulted, but the plans were basilican, with such variations
<span class="pagenum">158</span>
<a name="page158" id="page158"> </a>
as resulted from efforts to meet the exigencies of vaulted construction.
The nave was narrowed, and instead of rows of columns carrying a thin
clearstory wall, a&nbsp;few massive piers of masonry, connected by broad
pier-arches, supported the heavy ribs of the groined vaulting, as in
S.&nbsp;Ambrogio, Milan (Fig. 90). To resist the thrust of the main
vault, the clearstory was sometimes suppressed, the side aisle carried
up in two stories forming galleries, and rows of chapels added at the
sides, their partitions forming buttresses. The piers were often of
clustered section, the better to receive the various arches and ribs
they supported. The vaulting was in square divisions or
<i>vaulting-bays</i>, each embracing two pier-arches which met upon an
intermediate pier lighter than the others. Thus the whole aspect of the
interior was revolutionized. The lightness, spaciousness, and decorative
elegance of the basilicas were here exchanged for a sombre and massive
dignity severe in its plainness. The Choir was sometimes raised a few
feet above the nave, to allow of a crypt and <i>confessio</i> beneath,
reached by broad flights of steps from the nave. Sta.<!-- invisible .
-->
<span class="pagenum">159</span>
<a name="page159" id="page159"> </a>
Maria della Pieve at Arezzo (9th-11th century), <b>S.&nbsp;Michele</b>
at Pavia (late 11th century), the <b>Cathedral of Piacenza</b> (1122),
<b>S.&nbsp;Ambrogio</b> at Milan (12th century), and <b>S.&nbsp;Zeno</b>
at Verona (1139) are notable monuments of this style.</p>


<p><b>LOMBARD EXTERIORS.</b> The few architectural embellishments
employed on the simple exteriors of the Lombard churches were usually
effective and well composed. Slender columnettes or long pilasters,
blind arcades, and open arcaded galleries under the eaves gave light and
shade to these exteriors. The façades were mere frontispieces with a
single broad gable, the three aisles of the church being merely
suggested by flat or round pilasters dividing the front (Fig 91). Gabled
porches, with columns resting on the backs of lions or monsters, adorned
the doorways. The carving was often of a fierce and grotesque character.
Detached bell-towers or <i>campaniles</i> adjoined many of these
churches; square and simple in mass, but with well-distributed openings
and well-proportioned belfries (Piacenza S.&nbsp;Zeno at Verona,
etc.).<a class="tag" name="tag18" id="tag18" href="#note18">18</a></p>


<p><b>THE TUSCAN ROMANESQUE.</b> The churches of this style (sometimes
called the <b>Pisan</b>) were less vigorous but more elegant and
artistic in design than the Lombard. They were basilicas in plan, with
timber ceilings and high clearstories on columnar arcades. In their
decoration, both internal and external, they betray the influence of
Byzantine traditions, especially in the use of white and colored marble
in alternating bands or in panelled veneering. Still more striking is
the external decorative application of wall-arcades, sometimes occupying
the whole height of the wall and carried on flat pilasters, sometimes in
superposed stages of small arches on slender columns standing free of
the wall. In general the decorative element prevailed over the
constructive in the design of these picturesquely beautiful churches,
some of which are of noble size. The <b>Duomo</b> (cathedral) of
<b>Pisa</b>, built 1063&ndash;1118, is the finest monument
<span class="pagenum">160</span>
<a name="page160" id="page160"> </a>
of the style (Figs. 92, 93). It is 312 feet long and 118 wide, with long
transepts and an elliptical dome of later date over the <i>crossing</i>
(the intersection of nave and transepts). Its richly arcaded front and
banded flanks strikingly exemplify the illogical and unconstructive but
highly decorative methods of the Tuscan Romanesque builders. The
circular <b>Baptistery</b> (1153), with its lofty domical central hall
surrounded by an aisle, an imposing development of the type established
by Constantine (<a href="#page111">p.&nbsp;111</a>), and the famous
<b>Leaning Tower</b> (1174), both designed with external arcading,
combine with the Duomo to form the most remarkable group of
ecclesiastical buildings in Italy, if not in Europe (Fig.&nbsp;92).</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig92" id="fig92"> </a>
<img src="images/fig92.jpg" width="430" height="359"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 92.&mdash;BAPTISTERY, CATHEDRAL, AND LEANING TOWER, PISA.</p>

<p>The same style appears in more flamboyant shape in
<span class="pagenum">161</span>
<a name="page161" id="page161"> </a>
some of the churches of Lucca. The cathedral <b>S.&nbsp;Martino</b>
(1060; façade, 1204; nave altered in fourteenth century) is the finest
and largest of these; <b>S.&nbsp;Michele</b> (façade, 1288) and
S.&nbsp;Frediano (twelfth century) have the most elaborately decorated
façades. The same principles of design appear in the cathedral and
several other churches in Pistoia and Prato; but these belong, for the
most part, to the Gothic period.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig93" id="fig93"> </a>
<img src="images/fig93.jpg" width="430" height="290"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 93.&mdash;INTERIOR OF PISA CATHEDRAL.</p>


<p><b>FLORENCE.</b> The church of <b>S. Miniato</b>, in the suburbs of
Florence, is a beautiful example of a modification of the Pisan style.
It is in plan a basilica with two piers interrupting the colonnade on
each side of the nave and supporting powerful transverse arches. The
interior is embellished with bands and patterns in black and white, and
the woodwork of the open-timber roof is elegantly decorated with fine
patterns in red, green, blue, and gold&mdash;a&nbsp;treatment common in
early mediæval churches, as at Messina, Orvieto, etc. The exterior is
adorned with wall-arches of
<span class="pagenum">162</span>
<a name="page162" id="page162"> </a>
classic design and with panelled veneering in white and dark marble,
instead of the horizontal bands of the Pisan churches. This system of
external decoration, a&nbsp;blending of Pisan and Italo-Byzantine
methods, became the established practice in Florence, lasting through
the whole Gothic period. The <b>Baptistery</b> of Florence, originally
the cathedral, an imposing polygonal domical edifice of the tenth
century, presents externally one of the most admirable examples of this
practice. Its marble veneering in black and white, with pilasters and
arches of excellent design, is attributed by Vasari to Arnolfo di
Cambio, but is by many considered to be much older, although restored by
that architect in 1294.</p>

<p>Suggestions of the Pisan arcade system are found in widely scattered
examples in the east and south of Italy, mingled with features of
Lombard and Byzantine design. In Apulia, as at Bari, Caserta Vecchia
(1100), Molfetta (1192), and in Sicily, the Byzantine influence is
conspicuous in the use of domes and in many of the decorative details.
Particularly is this the case at Palermo and Monreale, where the
churches erected after the Norman conquest&mdash;some of them domical,
some basilican&mdash;show a strange but picturesque and beautiful
mixture of Romanesque, Byzantine, and Arabic forms. The <b>Cathedral</b>
of <b>Monreale</b> and the churches of the <b>Eremiti</b> and <b>La
Martorana</b> at Palermo are the most important.</p>

<p>The <b>Italo-Byzantine</b> style has already found mention in the
latter part of Chapter XI. Venice and Ravenna were its chief centres;
while the influence, both of the parent style and of its Italian
offshoot was, as we have just shown, very widespread.</p>


<p><b>WESTERN ROMANESQUE ARCHITECTURE.</b> In Western Europe the unrest
and lawlessness which attended the unsettled relations of society under
the feudal system long retarded the establishment of that social order
without
<span class="pagenum">163</span>
<a name="page163" id="page163"> </a>
which architectural progress is impossible. With the eleventh century
there began, however, a&nbsp;great activity in building, principally
among the monasteries, which represented all that there was of culture
and stability amid the prevailing disorder. Undisturbed by war, the only
abodes of peaceful labor, learning, and piety, they had become rich and
powerful, both in men and land. Probably the more or less general
apprehension of the supposed impending end of the world in the year 1000
contributed to this result by driving unquiet consciences to seek refuge
in the monasteries, or to endow them richly.</p>

<p>The monastic builders, with little technical training, but with
plenty of willing hands, sought out new architectural paths to meet
their special needs. Remote from classic and Byzantine models, and
mainly dependent on their own resources, they often failed to realize
the intended results. But skill came with experience, and with advancing
civilization and a surer mastery of construction came a finer taste and
greater elegance of design. Meanwhile military architecture developed a
new science of building, and covered Europe with imposing castles,
admirably constructed and often artistic in design as far as military
exigencies would permit.</p>


<p><b>CHARACTER OF THE STYLE.</b> The Romanesque architecture of the
eleventh and twelfth centuries in Western Europe (sometimes called the
<b>Round-Arched Gothic</b>) was thus predominantly though not
exclusively monastic. This gave it a certain unity of character in spite
of national and local variations. The problem which the wealthy orders
set themselves was, like that of the Lombard church-builders in Italy,
to adapt the basilica plan to the exigencies of vaulted construction.
Massive walls, round arches stepped or recessed to lighten their
appearance, heavy mouldings richly carved, clustered piers and
jamb-shafts, capitals either of the <i>cushion</i> type or imitated from
the Corinthian,
<span class="pagenum">164</span>
<a name="page164" id="page164"> </a>
and strong and effective carving&mdash;all these are features alike of
French, German, English, and Spanish Romanesque architecture.</p>


<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig94" id="fig94"> </a>
<img src="images/fig94.png" width="185" height="288"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 94.&mdash;PLAN OF ST. FRONT.<!-- invisible . --></p>

<p><b>THE FRENCH ROMANESQUE.</b> Though monasticism produced remarkable
results in France, architecture there did not wholly depend upon the
monasteries. Southern Gaul (Provence) was full of classic remains and
classic traditions while at the same time it maintained close trade
relations with Venice and the East.<a class="tag" name="tag19" id="tag19" href="#note19">19</a> The church of <b>St. Front</b> at
Perigueux, built in 1120, reproduced the plan of St. Mark’s with
singular fidelity, but without its rich decoration, and with pointed
instead of round arches (Figs. 94, 95). The domical cathedral of
<b>Cahors</b> (1050&ndash;1100), an obvious imitation of S.&nbsp;Irene
at Constantinople, and the later and more Gothic Cathedral of
<b>Angoulême</b> display a notable advance in architectural skill
outside of the monasteries. Among the abbeys, <b>Fontevrault</b>
(1101&ndash;1119) closely resembles Angoulême, but surpasses it in the
elegance of its choir and chapels. In these and a number of other
domical churches of the same Franco-Byzantine type in Aquitania, the
substitution of the Latin cross in the plan for the Greek cross used in
St. Front, evinces the Gallic tendency to work out to their logical end
new ideas or new applications of old ones. These striking variations on
Byzantine themes might have developed into an independent local style
but for the overwhelming
<span class="pagenum">165</span>
<a name="page165" id="page165"> </a>
tide of Gothic influence which later poured in from the North.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig95" id="fig95"> </a>
<img src="images/fig95.png" width="246" height="326"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 95.&mdash;INTERIOR OF ST. FRONT, PERIGUEUX.</p>

<p>Meanwhile, farther south (at Arles, Avignon, etc.), classic models
strongly influenced the details, if not the plans, of an interesting
series of churches remarkable especially for their porches rich with
figure sculpture and for their elaborately carved details. The classic
archivolt, the Corinthian capital, the Roman forms of enriched
mouldings, are evident at a glance in the porches of Notre Dame des Doms
at Avignon, of the church of St. Gilles, and of St. Trophime at
Arles.</p>


<p class="illustration float w120">
<a name="fig96" id="fig96"> </a>
<img src="images/fig96.png" width="111" height="200"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 96.&mdash;PLAN OF NOTRE DAME DU PORT, CLERMONT.</p>

<p><b>DEVELOPMENT OF VAULTING.</b> It was in Central France, and mainly
along the Loire, that the systematic development of vaulted church
architecture began. Naves covered with barrel-vaults appear in a number
of large churches built during the eleventh and twelfth centuries, with
apsidal and transeptal chapels and aisles carried around the apse, as in
St. Etienne, Nevers, <b>Notre Dame du Port</b> at Clermont-Ferrand (Fig.
96), and <b>St. Paul</b> at Issoire. The thrust of these ponderous
vaults was clumsily resisted by half-barrel vaults over the side-aisles,
transmitting the strain to massive side-walls (Fig. 97), or by high
side-aisles with transverse barrel or groined vaults over each bay. In
either case the clearstory was suppressed&mdash;a&nbsp;fact which
mattered
<span class="pagenum">166</span>
<a name="page166" id="page166"> </a>
little in the sunny southern provinces. In the more cloudy North, in
Normandy, Picardy, and the Royal Domain, the nave-vault was raised
higher to admit of clearstory windows, and its section was in some cases
made like a pointed arch, to diminish its thrust, as at <b>Autun</b>.
But these eleventh-century vaults nearly all fell in, and had to be
reconstructed on new principles. In this work the Clunisians seem to
have led the way, as at <b>Cluny</b> (1089) and <b>Vézelay</b> (1100).
In the latter church, one of the finest and most interesting French
edifices of the twelfth century, a&nbsp;groined vault replaced the
barrel-vault, though the oblong plan of the vaulting-bays, due to the
nave being wider than the pier-arches, led to somewhat awkward twisted
surfaces in the vaulting. But even here the vaults had insufficient
lateral buttressing, and began to crack and settle; so that in the great
ante-chapel, built thirty years later, the side-aisles were made in two
stories, the better to resist the thrust, and the groined vaults
themselves were constructed of pointed section. These seem to be the
earliest pointed groined vaults in France. It was not till the second
half of that century, however (1150&ndash;1200), that the flying
buttress was combined with such vaults, so as to permit of high
clearstories for the better lighting of the nave; and
<span class="pagenum">167</span>
<a name="page167" id="page167"> </a>
the problem of satisfactorily vaulting an oblong space with a groined
vault was not solved until the following century.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig97" id="fig97"> </a>
<img src="images/fig97.png" width="232" height="230"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 97.&mdash;SECTION OF NOTRE DAME DU PORT, CLERMONT.</p>


<p><b>ONE-AISLED CHURCHES.</b> In the Franco-Byzantine churches already
described (<a href="#page164">p.&nbsp;164</a>) this difficulty of the
oblong vaulting-bay did not occur, owing to the absence of side-aisles
and pier-arches. Following this conception of church-planning,
a&nbsp;number of interesting parish churches and a few cathedrals were
built in various parts of France in which side-recesses or chapels took
the place of side-aisles. The partitions separating them served as
abutments for the groined or barrel-vaults of the nave. The cathedrals
of <b>Autun</b> (1150) and <b>Langres</b> (1160), and in the fourteenth
century that of Alby, employed this arrangement, common in many earlier
Provençal churches which have disappeared.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig98" id="fig98"> </a>
<img src="images/fig98.png" width="245" height="216"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 98.&mdash;A SIX-PART RIBBED VAULT, SHOWING TWO COMPARTMENTS WITH
THE FILLINGS COMPLETE.</p>

<p class="caption w240">
<i>a, a, Transverse ribs (doubleaux); b,&nbsp;b, Wall-ribs (formerets);
c,&nbsp;c, Groin-ribs (diagonaux).</i><br>
(All the ribs are semicircles.)</p>

<p><b>SIX-PART VAULTING.</b> In the Royal Domain great architectural
activity does not appear to have begun until the beginning of the Gothic
period in the middle of the twelfth century. But in Normandy, and
especially at Caen and Mont St. Michel, there were produced, between
1046 and 1120, some remarkable churches, in which a high clearstory was
secured in conjunction with a vaulted nave, by the use of “six-part”
vaulting (Fig. 98). This was an awkward expedient, by which a square
vaulting-bay was divided into six parts by the groins and by a middle
transverse rib, necessitating two narrow skew vaults meeting at
<span class="pagenum">168</span>
<a name="page168" id="page168"> </a>
the centre. This unsatisfactory device was retained for over a century,
and was common in early Gothic churches both in France and Great
Britain. It made it possible to resist the thrust by high side-aisles,
and yet to open windows above these under the cross-vaults. The abbey
churches of <b>St. Etienne</b> (the Abbaye aux Hommes) and <b>Ste.
Trinité</b> (Abbaye aux Dames), at Caen, built in the time of William
the Conqueror, were among the most magnificent churches of their time,
both in size and in the excellence and ingenuity of their construction.
The great abbey church of <b>Mont St. Michel</b> (much altered in later
times) should also be mentioned here. At the same time these and other
Norman churches showed a great advance in their internal composition.
A&nbsp;well-developed triforium or subordinate gallery was introduced
between the pier-arches and clearstory, and all the structural membering
of the edifice was better proportioned and more logically expressed than
in most contemporary work.</p>


<p><b>ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS.</b> The details of French Romanesque
architecture varied considerably in the several provinces, according as
classic, Byzantine, or local influences prevailed. Except in a few of
the Aquitanian churches, the round arch was universal. The walls were
heavy and built of rubble between facings of stones of moderate size
dressed with the axe. Windows and doors were widely splayed to diminish
the obstruction of the massive walls, and were treated with jamb-shafts
and recessed arches. These were usually formed with large cylindrical
mouldings, richly carved with leaf ornaments, zigzags, billets, and
grotesques. Figure-sculpture was more generally used in the South than
in the North. The interior piers were sometimes cylindrical, but more
often clustered, and where square bays of four-part or six-part vaulting
were employed, the piers were alternately lighter and heavier. Each
shaft had its independent capital either of the block type or of a form
<span class="pagenum">169</span>
<a name="page169" id="page169"> </a>
resembling somewhat that of the Corinthian order. During the eleventh
century it became customary to carry up to the main vaulting one or more
shafts of the compound pier to support the vaulting ribs. Thus the
division of the nave into <i>bays</i> was accentuated, while at the same
time the horizontal three-fold division of the height by a well-defined
triforium between the pier-arches and clearstory began to be likewise
emphasized.</p>


<p><b>VAULTING.</b> The vaulting was also divided into bays by
transverse ribs, and where it was groined the groins themselves began in
the twelfth century to be marked by groin-ribs. These were constructed
independently of the vaulting, and the four or six compartments of each
vaulting-bay were then built in, the ribs serving, in part at least, to
support the centrings for this purpose. This far-reaching principle,
already applied by the Romans in their concrete vaults (see <a href="#page84">p.&nbsp;84</a>), appears as a re-discovery, or rather an
independent invention, of the builders of Normandy at the close of the
eleventh century. The flying buttress was a later invention; in the
round-arched buildings of the eleventh and twelfth centuries the
buttressing was mainly internal, and was incomplete and timid in its
arrangement.</p>


<p><b>EXTERIORS.</b> The exteriors were on this account plain and flat.
The windows were small, the mouldings simple, and towers were rarely
combined with the body of the church until after the beginning of the
twelfth century. Then they appeared as mere belfries of moderate height,
with pyramidal roofs and effectively arranged openings, the germs of the
noble Gothic spires of later times. Externally the western porches and
portals were the most important features of the design, producing an
imposing effect by their massive arches, clustered piers, richly carved
mouldings, and deep shadows.</p>


<p><b>CLOISTERS, ETC.</b> Mention should be made of the other monastic
buildings which were grouped around the abbey
<span class="pagenum">170</span>
<a name="page170" id="page170"> </a>
churches of this period. These comprised refectories, chapter-halls,
cloistered courts surrounded by the conventual cells, and a large number
of accessory structures for kitchens, infirmaries, stores, etc. The
whole formed an elaborate and complex aggregation of connected
buildings, often of great size and beauty, especially the refectories
and cloisters. Most of these conventual buildings have disappeared, many
of them having been demolished during the Gothic period to make way for
more elegant structures in the new style. There remain, however,
a&nbsp;number of fine cloistered courts in their original form,
especially in Southern France. Among the most remarkable of these are
those of <b>Moissac</b>, <b>Elne</b>, and <b>Montmajour</b>.</p>


<div class="monuments">
<p><b>MONUMENTS.</b> <span class="smallcaps">Italy.</span> (For
basilicas and domical churches of 6th-12th centuries see pp. 118,
119.)&mdash;Before 11th century: Sta. Maria at Toscanella, altered 1206;
S.&nbsp;Donato, Zara; chapel at Friuli; baptistery at Boella. 11th
century: S.&nbsp;Giovanni, Viterbo; Sta. Maria della Pieve, Arezzo;
S.&nbsp;Antonio, Piacenza, 1014; Eremiti, 1132, and La Martorana, 1143,
both at Palermo; Duomo at Bari, 1027 (much altered); Duomo and
baptistery, Novara, 1030; Duomo at Parma, begun 1058; Duomo at Pisa,
1063&ndash;1118; S.&nbsp;Miniato, Florence, 1063&ndash;12th century;
S.&nbsp;Michele at Pavia and Duomo at Modena, late 11th
century.&mdash;12th century: in Calabria and Apulia, cathedrals of
Trani, 1100; Caserta, Vecchia, 1100&ndash;1153; Molfetta, 1162;
Benevento; churches S.&nbsp;Giovanni at Brindisi, S.&nbsp;Niccolo at
Bari, 1139. In Sicily, Duomo at Monreale, 1174&ndash;1189. In Northern
Italy, S.&nbsp;Tomaso in Limine, Bergamo, 1100 (?); Sta. Giulia,
Brescia; S.&nbsp;Lorenzo, Milan, rebuilt 1119; Duomo at Piacenza, 1122;
S.&nbsp;Zeno at Verona, 1139; S.&nbsp;Ambrogio, Milan, 1140, vaulted in
13th century; baptistery at Pisa, 1153&ndash;1278; Leaning Tower, Pisa,
1174.&mdash;14th century: S.&nbsp;Michele, Lucca, 1188; S.&nbsp;Giovanni
and S.&nbsp;Frediano, Lucca. In Dalmatia, cathedral at Zara,
1192&ndash;1204. Many castles and early town-halls, as at Bari, Brescia,
Lucca, etc.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">France</span>: Previous to 11th century:
St. Germiny-des-Prés, 806, Chapel of the Trinity, St.
Honorat-des-Lérins; Ste. Croix de Montmajour.&mdash;11th century:
Cérisy-la-Forêt and abbey church of Mont St. Michel, 1020 (the latter
altered in 12th and 16th centuries<ins class="correction" title=") missing">);</ins> Vignory; St. Genou; porch of St. Bénoit-sur-Loire,
1030; St. Sépulchre at Neuvy, 1045; Ste. Trinité
<span class="pagenum">171</span>
<a name="page171" id="page171"> </a>
(Abbaye aux Dames) at Caen, 1046, vaulted 1140; St. Etienne (Abbaye aux
Hommes) at Caen, same date; St. Front at Perigueux, 1120; Ste. Croix at
Quimperlé, 1081; cathedral, Cahors, 1050&ndash;1110; abbey churches of
Cluny (demolished) and Vézelay, 1089&ndash;1100; circular church of
Rieux-Mérinville, church of St. Savin in Auvergne, the churches of St.
Paul at Issoire and Notre-Dame-du-Port at Clermont, St. Hilaire and
Notre-Dame-la-Grande at Poitiers; also St. Sernin (Saturnin) at
Toulouse, all at close of 11th and beginning of 12th century.&mdash;12th
century: Domical churches of Aquitania and vicinity; Solignac and
Fontévrault, 1120; St. Etienne (Périgueux), St. Avit-Sénieur; Angoulême,
Souillac, Broussac, etc., early 12th century; St. Trophime at Arles,
1110, cloisters later; church of Vaison; abbeys and cloisters at
Montmajour, Tarascon, Moissac (with fragments of a 10th-century cloister
built into present arcades); St. Paul-du-Mausolée; Puy-en-Vélay, with
fine church. Many other abbeys, parish churches, and a few cathedrals in
Central and Northern France especially.<!-- invisible . --></p>
</div>

<div class="footnote">

<p><a name="note18" id="note18" href="#tag18">18.</a>
See <a href="#appB">Appendix B</a>.</p>

<p><a name="note19" id="note19" href="#tag19">19.</a>
See Viollet-le-Duc, <i>Dictionnaire raisonné</i>, article <span class="smallcaps">Architecture</span>, vol. i., pp. 66 <i>et seq.</i>; also de
Verneilh, <i>L’Architecture byzantine en France</i>.</p>

</div>

<span class="pagenum">172</span>
<a name="page172" id="page172"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXIV" id="chapXIV">CHAPTER XIV.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
EARLY MEDIÆVAL ARCHITECTURE.&mdash;<i>Continued.</i></h3>

<h3 class="subsub">
IN GERMANY, GREAT BRITAIN, AND SPAIN.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before, Hübsch
and Reber. Bond, <i>Gothic Architecture in England</i>. Also Brandon,
<i>Analysis of Gothic Architecture</i>. Boisserée, <i>Nieder Rhein</i>.
Ditchfield, <i>The Cathedrals of England</i>. Hasak, <i>Die romanische
und die gotische Baukunst</i> (in <i>Handbuch d. Arch.</i>). Lübke,
<i>Die Mittelalterliche Kunst in Westfalen</i>. Möller, <i>Denkmäler der
deutschen Baukunst</i>. Puttrich, <i>Baukunst des Mittelalters in
Sachsen</i>. Rickman, <i>An Attempt to Discriminate the Styles of
Architecture</i>. Scott, <i>English Church Architecture</i>. Van
Rensselaer, <i>English Cathedrals</i>.</p>


<p><b>MEDIÆVAL GERMANY.</b> Architecture developed less rapidly and
symmetrically in Germany than in France, notwithstanding the strong
centralized government of the empire. The early churches were of wood,
and the substitution of stone for wood proceeded slowly. During the
Carolingian epoch (800&ndash;919), however, a&nbsp;few important
buildings were erected, embodying Byzantine and classic traditions.
Among these the most notable was the <b>Minster</b> or palatine chapel
of Charlemagne at <b>Aix-la-Chapelle</b>, an obvious imitation of San
Vitale at Ravenna. It consisted of an octagonal domed hall surrounded by
a vaulted aisle in two stories, but without the eight niches of the
Ravenna plan. It was preceded by a porch flanked by turrets. The
Byzantine type thus introduced was repeated in later churches, as in the
Nuns’ Choir at Essen (947) and at Ottmarsheim (1050). In the great
monastery at Fulda a basilica with
<span class="pagenum">173</span>
<a name="page173" id="page173"> </a>
transepts and with an apsidal choir at either end was built in 803.
These choirs were raised above the level of the nave, to admit of crypts
beneath them, as in many Lombard churches; a&nbsp;practice which, with
the reduplication of the choir and apse just mentioned, became very
common in German Romanesque architecture.</p>


<p><b>EARLY CHURCHES.</b> It was in Saxony that this architecture first
entered upon a truly national development. The early churches of this
province and of Hildesheim (where architecture flourished under the
favor of the bishops, as elsewhere under the royal influence) were of
basilican plan and destitute of vaulting, except in the crypts. They
were built with massive piers, sometimes rectangular, sometimes
clustered, the two kinds often alternating in the same nave. Short
columns were, however, sometimes used instead of piers, either alone, as
at Paulinzelle and Limburg-on-the-Hardt (1024&ndash;39), or alternating
with piers, as at Hecklingen, <b>Gernrode</b> (958&ndash;1050), and
<b>St. Godehard</b> at Hildesheim (1133). A&nbsp;triple eastern apse,
with apsidal chapels projecting eastward from the transepts, were common
elements in the plans, and a second apse, choir, and crypt at the west
end were not infrequent. Externally the most striking feature was the
association of two, four, or even six square or circular towers with the
mass of the church, and the elevation of square or polygonal turrets or
cupolas over the crossing. These adjuncts gave a very picturesque aspect
to edifices otherwise somewhat wanting in artistic interest.</p>


<p class="illustration float w90">
<a name="fig99" id="fig99"> </a>
<img src="images/fig99.png" width="83" height="240"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 99.&mdash;PLAN OF MINSTER AT WORMS.</p>

<p><b>RHENISH CHURCHES.</b> It was in the Rhine provinces that vaulting
was first applied to the naves of German churches, nearly a half century
after its general adoption in France. Cologne possesses an
<span class="pagenum">174</span>
<a name="page174" id="page174"> </a>
interesting trio of churches in which the Byzantine dome on squinches or
on pendentives, with three apses or niches opening into the central
area, was associated with a long three aisled nave (<b>St.
Mary-in-the-Capitol</b>, begun in 9th century; <b>Great St.
Martin’s</b>, 1150&ndash;70; <b>Apostles’ Church</b>, 1160&ndash;99: the
naves vaulted later). The double chapel at <b>Schwarz-Rheindorf</b>,
near Bonn (1151), also has the crossing covered by a dome on
pendentives.</p>

<p class="illustration floatleft w180">
<a name="fig100" id="fig100"> </a>
<img src="images/fig100.png" width="182" height="376"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 100.&mdash;ONE BAY OF CATHEDRAL AT SPIRES.</p>

<p>The vaulting of the nave itself was developed in another series of
edifices of imposing size, the cathedrals of <b>Mayence</b> (1036),
<b>Spires</b> (Speyer), and <b>Worms</b>, and the <b>Abbey of Laach</b>,
all built in the 11th century and vaulted early in the 12th. In the
first three the main vaulting is in square bays, each covering two bays
of the nave, the piers of which are alternately lighter and heavier
(Figs. 99, 100). At Laach the vaulting-bays are oblong, both in nave and
aisles. There was no triforium gallery, and stability was secured only
by excessive thickness in the piers and clearstory walls, and by
bringing down the main vault as near to the side-aisle roofs as
possible.</p>


<p><b>RHENISH EXTERIORS.</b> These great churches, together with those
of <b>Bonn</b> and <b>Limburg-on-the-Lahn</b> and the cathedral of
<b>Treves</b> (Trier, 1047), are interesting, not only by their size and
dignity of plan and the somewhat rude massiveness of their construction,
but even more so by the picturesqueness
<span class="pagenum">175</span>
<a name="page175" id="page175"> </a>
of their external design (Fig. 101). Especially successful is the
massing of the large and small turrets with the lofty nave-roof and with
the apses at one or both ends. The systematic use of arcading to
decorate the exterior walls, and the introduction of open arcaded dwarf
galleries under the cornices of the apses, gables, and dome-turrets,
gave to these Rhenish churches an external beauty hardly equalled in
other contemporary edifices. This method of exterior design, and the
system of vaulting in square bays over double bays of the nave, were
probably derived from the Lombard churches of Northern Italy, with which
the <ins class="correction" title="spelling unchanged">Hohenstauffen</ins> emperors had many political
relations.</p>

<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig101" id="fig101"> </a>
<img src="images/fig101.jpg" width="242" height="350"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 101.&mdash;EAST END OF CHURCH OF THE APOSTLES, COLOGNE.</p>

<p>The Italian influence is also encountered in a number of circular
churches of early date, as at Fulda (9th-11th century), Drügelte, Bonn
(baptistery, demolished), and in façades like that at Rosheim, which is
a copy in little of San Zeno at Verona.</p>

<p>Elsewhere in Germany architecture was in a backward state, especially
in the southern provinces. Outside of Saxony, Franconia, and the Rhine
provinces, very few works of importance were erected until the
thirteenth century.</p>


<span class="pagenum">176</span>
<a name="page176" id="page176"> </a>
<p><b>SECULAR ARCHITECTURE.</b> Little remains to us of the secular
architecture of this period in Germany, if we except the great feudal
castles, especially those of the Rhine, which were, after all, rather
works of military engineering than of architectural art. The palace of
Charlemagne at Aix (the chapel of which was mentioned on <a href="#page172">p.&nbsp;172</a>) is known to have been a vast and splendid
group of buildings, partly, at least of marble; but hardly a vestige of
it remains. Of the extensive <b>Palace of Henry III.</b> at
<b>Goslar</b> there remain well-defined ruins of an imposing hall of
assembly in two aisles with triple-arched windows. At Brunswick the east
wing of the <b>Burg Dankwargerode</b> displays, in spite of modern
alterations, the arrangement of the chapel, great hall, two fortified
towers, and part of the residence of Henry the Lion. The <b>Wartburg</b>
palace (Ludwig III., <i>cir.</i> 1150) is more generally
known&mdash;a&nbsp;rectangular hall in three stories, with windows
effectively grouped to form arcades; while at Gelnhausen and Münzenberg
are ruins of somewhat similar buildings. A&nbsp;few of the Romanesque
monasteries of Germany have left partial remains, as at
<b>Maulbronn</b>, which was almost entirely rebuilt in the Gothic
period, and isolated buildings in Cologne and elsewhere. There remain
also in Cologne a number of Romanesque private houses with coupled
windows and stepped gables.</p>


<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig102" id="fig102"> </a>
<img src="images/fig102.png" width="184" height="388"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 102.&mdash;PLAN OF DURHAM CATHEDRAL.</p>

<p><b>GREAT BRITAIN.</b> Previous to the Norman conquest (1066) there
was in the British Isles little or no architecture worthy of mention.
The few extant remains of Saxon and Celtic buildings reveal a singular
poverty of ideas and want of technical skill. These scanty remains are
mostly of towers (those in Ireland nearly all round and tapering, with
conical tops, their use and date being the subjects of much controversy)
and crypts. The tower of Earl’s Barton is the most important and best
preserved of those in England. With the Norman conquest, however, began
an extraordinary activity in the building of churches and abbeys.
<span class="pagenum">177</span>
<a name="page177" id="page177"> </a>
William the Conqueror himself founded a number of these, and his Norman
ecclesiastics endeavored to surpass on British soil the contemporary
churches of Normandy. The new churches differed somewhat from their
French prototypes; they were narrower and lower, but much longer,
especially as to the choir and transepts. The cathedrals of
<b>Durham</b> (1096&ndash;1133) and <b>Norwich</b> (same date) are
important examples (Fig. 102). They also differed from the French
churches in two important particulars externally; a&nbsp;huge tower rose
usually over the crossing, and the western portals were small and
insignificant. Lateral entrances near the west end were given greater
importance and called <i>Galilees</i>. At Durham a Galilee chapel (not
shown in the plan), takes the place of a porch at the west end, like the
ante-churches of St. Benoît-sur-Loire and Vézelay.</p>


<p><b>THE NORMAN STYLE.</b> The Anglo-Norman builders employed the same
general features as the Romanesque builders of Normandy, but with more
of picturesqueness and less of refinement and technical elegance. Heavy
walls, recessed arches, round mouldings, cubic cushion-caps, clustered
piers, and in doorways a jamb-shaft for each stepping of the arch were
common to both styles. But in England the Corinthian form of capital is
rare, its place being taken by simpler forms.</p>


<p class="illustration floatleft w120">
<a name="fig103" id="fig103"> </a>
<img src="images/fig103.png" width="118" height="378"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 103.&mdash;ONE BAY OF TRANSEPT, WINCHESTER CATHEDRAL.</p>

<p><b>NORMAN INTERIORS.</b> The interior design of the larger churches
of this period shows a close general analogy to
<span class="pagenum">178</span>
<a name="page178" id="page178"> </a>
contemporaneous French Norman churches, as appears by comparing the nave
of Waltham or Peterboro’ with that of Cérisy-la-Forêt, in Normandy.
Although the massiveness of the Anglo-Norman piers and walls plainly
suggests the intention of vaulting the nave, this intention seems never
to have been carried out except in small churches and crypts. All the
existing abbeys and cathedrals of this period had wooden ceilings or
were, like Durham, Norwich, and Gloucester, vaulted at a later date.
Completed as they were with wooden nave-roofs, the clearstory was,
without danger, made quite lofty and furnished with windows of
considerable size. These were placed near the outside of the thick wall,
and a passage was left between them and a triple arch on the inner face
of the wall&mdash;a&nbsp;device imitated from the abbeys at Caen. The
vaulted side-aisles were low, with disproportionately wide pier-arches,
above which was a high triforium gallery under the side-roofs. Thus a
nearly equal height was assigned to each of the three stories of the
bay, disregarding that subordination of minor to major parts which gives
interest to an architectural composition. The piers were quite often
round, as at Gloucester, Hereford, and Bristol. Sometimes round piers
alternated with clustered piers, as at Durham and Waltham; and in some
cases clustered piers alone were employed, as at Peterboro’ and in the
transepts of Winchester (Fig. 103).</p>


<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig104" id="fig104"> </a>
<img src="images/fig104.png" width="212" height="306"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 104.&mdash;FRONT OF IFFLEY CHURCH.</p>

<p><b>FAÇADES AND DOORWAYS.</b> All the details were of the simplest
character, except in the doorways. These were richly adorned with
clustered jamb-shafts and elaborately carved
<span class="pagenum">179</span>
<a name="page179" id="page179"> </a>
mouldings, but there was little variety in the details of this carving.
The zigzag was the most common feature, though birds’ heads with the
beaks pointing toward the centre of the arch were not uncommon. In the
smaller churches (Fig. 104) the doorways were better proportioned to the
whole façade than in the larger ones, in which they appear as relatively
insignificant features. Very few examples remain of important Norman
façades in their original form, nearly all of these having been altered
after the round arch was displaced by the pointed arch in the latter
part of the twelfth century. Iffley church (Fig. 104) is a good example
of the style.</p>


<p><b>SPAIN.</b> During the Romanesque period a large part of Spain was
under Moorish dominion. The capture of Toledo, in 1062, by the
Christians, began the gradual emancipation of the country from Moslem
rule, and in the northern provinces a number of important churches were
erected under the influence of French Romanesque models. The use of
domical pendentives (as in the <b>Panteon</b> of <b>S.&nbsp;Isidoro</b>,
at Leon, and in the <i>cimborio</i> or dome over the choir at the
intersection of nave and transepts in old Salamanca cathedral) was
probably derived from the domical churches of Aquitania and Anjou.
Elsewhere the northern Romanesque type prevailed under various
modifications, with long nave and transepts, a&nbsp;short choir, and a
<span class="pagenum">180</span>
<a name="page180" id="page180"> </a>
complete <i>chevet</i> with apsidal chapels. The church of <b>St.
Iago</b> at Compostella (1078) is the finest example of this class.
These churches nearly all had groined vaulting over the side-aisles and
barrel-vaults over the nave, the constructive system being substantially
that of the churches of Auvergne and the Loire Valley (<a href="#page165">p.&nbsp;165</a>). They differed, however, in the treatment of
the crossing of nave and transepts, over which was usually erected a
dome or cupola or pendentives or squinches, covered externally by an
imposing square lantern or tower, as in the <b>Old Cathedral</b> at
<b>Salamanca</b>, already mentioned (1120&ndash;78) and the
<b>Collegiate Church</b> at <b>Toro</b>. Occasional exceptions to these
types are met with, as in the basilican wooden-roofed church of
S.&nbsp;Millan at Segovia; in <b>S.&nbsp;Isidoro</b> at Leon, with
chapels and a later-added square eastern end, and the circular church of
the Templars at Segovia.</p>

<p>The architectural details of these Spanish churches did not differ
radically from contemporary French work. As in France and England, the
doorways were the most ornate parts of the design, the mouldings being
carved with extreme richness and the jambs frequently adorned with
statues, as in <b>S.&nbsp;Vincente</b> at Avila. There was no such
logical and reasoned-out system of external design as in France, and
there is consequently greater variety in the façades. Perhaps the most
remarkable thing about the architecture of this period is its apparent
exemption from the influence of the Moorish monuments which abounded on
every hand. This may be explained by the hatred which was felt by the
Christians for the Moslems and all their works.</p>

<div class="monuments">

<p><b>MONUMENTS.</b> <span class="smallcaps">Germany</span>: Previous
to 11th century: Circular churches of Holy Cross at Münster, and of
Fulda; palace chapel of Charlemagne at Aix-la-Chapelle, 804; St.
Stephen, Mayence, 990; primitive nave and crypt of St. Gereon, Cologne,
10th century; Lorsch.&mdash;11th century: Churches of Gernrode, Goslar,
and Merseburg in Saxony; cathedral
<span class="pagenum">181</span>
<a name="page181" id="page181"> </a>
of Bremen; first restoration of cathedral of Treves (Trier), 1010, west
front, 1047; Limburg-on-Hardt, 1024; St. Willibrod, Echternach, 1031;
east end of Mayence Cathedral, 1036; Church of Apostles and nave St.
Mary-in-Capitol at Cologne, 1036; cathedral of Spires (Speyer) begun
1040; Cathedral Hildesheim, 1061; St. Joseph, Bamberg, 1073; Abbey of
Laach, 1093&ndash;1156; round churches of Bonn, Drügelte, Nimeguen;
cathedrals of Paderborn and Minden.&mdash;12th century: Churches of
Klus, Paulinzelle, Hamersleben, 1100&ndash;1110; Johannisberg, 1130; St.
Godehard. Hildesheim, 1133; Worms, the Minster, 1118&ndash;83; Jerichau,
1144&ndash;60; Schwarz-Rheindorf, 1151; St. Michael, Hildesheim, 1162;
Cathedral Brunswick, 1172&ndash;94; Lubeck, 1172; also churches of
Gaudersheim, Würzburg, St. Matthew at Treves, Limburg-on-Lahn, Sinzig,
St. Castor at Coblentz, Diesdorf, Rosheim; round churches of Ottmarsheim
and Rippen (Denmark); cathedral of Basle, cathedral and cloister of
Zurich (Switzerland).</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">England</span>: Previous to 11th century:
Scanty vestiges of Saxon church architecture, as tower of Earl’s Barton,
round towers and small chapels in Ireland.&mdash;11th century: Crypt of
Canterbury Cathedral, 1070; chapel St. John in Tower of London, 1070;
Winchester Cathedral, 1076&ndash;93 (nave and choir rebuilt later);
Gloucester Cathedral nave, 1089&ndash;1100 (vaulted later); Rochester
Cathedral nave, west front cloisters, and chapter-house,
1090&ndash;1130; Carlisle Cathedral nave, transepts, 1093&ndash;1130;
Durham Cathedral, 1095&ndash;1133, vaulted 1233; Galilee and
chapter-house, 1133&ndash;53; Norwich Cathedral, 1096, largely rebuilt
1118&ndash;93; Hereford Cathedral, nave and choir,
1099&ndash;1115.&mdash;12th century: Ely Cathedral, nave, 1107&ndash;33;
St. Alban’s Abbey, 1116; Peterboro’ Cathedral, 1117&ndash;45; Waltham
Abbey, early 12th century; Church of Holy Sepulchre, Cambridge,
1130&ndash;35; Worcester Cathedral chapter-house, 1140 (?); Oxford
Cathedral (Christ Church), 1150&ndash;80; Bristol Cathedral
chapter-house (square), 1155; Canterbury Cathedral, choir of present
structure by William of Sens, 1175; Chichester Cathedral,
1180&ndash;1204; Romsey Abbey, late 12th century; St. Cross Hospital
near Winchester, 1190 (?). Many more or less important parish churches
in various parts of England.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Spain.</span> For principal monuments of
9th-12th centuries, see text, latter part of this chapter.</p>

</div>




<span class="pagenum">182</span>
<a name="page182" id="page182"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXV" id="chapXV">CHAPTER XV.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: Adamy,
<i>Architektonik des gotischen Stils</i>. Corroyer, <i>L’Architecture
gothique</i>. Enlart, <i>Manuel d’archéologie française</i>. Hasak,
<i>Einzelheiten des Kirchenbaues</i> (in <i>Hdbuch d. Arch.</i>). Moore,
<i>Development and Character of Gothic Architecture</i>. Parker,
<i>Introduction to Gothic Architecture.</i> Scott, <i>Mediæval
Architecture</i>. Viollet-le-Duc, <i>Discourses on Architecture</i>;
<i>Dictionnaire raisonné de l’architecture française</i>.</p>


<p><b>INTRODUCTORY.</b> The architectural styles which were developed in
Western Europe during the period extending from about 1150 to 1450 or
1500, received in an unscientific age the wholly erroneous and inept
name of Gothic. This name has, however, become so fixed in common usage
that it is hardly possible to substitute for it any more scientific
designation. In reality the architecture to which it is applied was
nothing more than the sequel and outgrowth of the Romanesque, which we
have already studied. Its fundamental principles were the same; it was
concerned with the same problems. These it took up where the Romanesque
builders left them, and worked out their solution under new conditions,
until it had developed out of the simple and massive models of the early
twelfth century the splendid cathedrals of the thirteenth and fourteenth
centuries in England, France, Germany, the Low Countries and Spain.</p>


<p><b>THE CHURCH AND ARCHITECTURE.</b> The twelfth century was an era of
transition in society, as in architecture. The ideas of Church and State
were becoming more clearly defined in the common mind. In the conflict
between feudalism
<span class="pagenum">183</span>
<a name="page183" id="page183"> </a>
and royalty the monarchy was steadily gaining ground. The problem of
human right was beginning to present itself alongside of the problem of
human might. The relations between the crown, the feudal barons, the
pope, bishops, and abbots, differed widely in France, Germany, England,
and other countries. The struggle among them for supremacy presented
itself, therefore, in varied aspects; but the general outcome was
essentially the same. The church began to appear as something behind and
above abbots, bishops, kings, and barons. The supremacy of the papal
authority gained increasing recognition, and the episcopacy began to
overshadow the monastic institutions; the bishops appearing generally,
but especially in France, as the champions of popular rights. The
prerogatives of the crown became more firmly established, and thus the
Church and the State emerged from the social confusion as the two
institutions divinely appointed for the government of men.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig105" id="fig105"> </a>
<img src="images/fig105.png" width="278" height="284"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 105.&mdash;CONSTRUCTIVE SYSTEM OF GOTHIC CHURCH,<br>
ILLUSTRATING PRINCIPLES OF ISOLATED SUPPORTS AND BUTTRESSING.</p>

<p>Under these influences ecclesiastical architecture advanced with
rapid strides. No longer hampered by monastic restrictions, it called
into its service the laity, whose guilds of masons and builders carried
from one diocese to another their constantly increasing stores of
constructive
<span class="pagenum">184</span>
<a name="page184" id="page184"> </a>
knowledge. By a wise division of labor, each man wrought only such parts
as he was specially trained to undertake. The
master-builder&mdash;bishop, abbot, or mason&mdash;seems to have planned
only the general arrangement and scheme of the building, leaving the
precise form of each detail to be determined as the work advanced,
according to the skill and fancy of the artisan to whom it was
intrusted. Thus was produced that remarkable variety in unity of the
Gothic cathedrals; thus, also, those singular irregularities and
makeshifts, those discrepancies and alterations in the design, which are
found in every great work of mediæval architecture. Gothic architecture
was constantly changing, attacking new problems or devising new
solutions of old ones. In this character of constant flux and
development it contrasts strongly with the classic styles, in which the
scheme and the principles were easily fixed and remained substantially
unchanged for centuries.</p>


<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig106" id="fig106"> </a>
<img src="images/fig106.png" width="140" height="344"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 106.&mdash;PLAN OF SAINTE CHAPELLE, PARIS, SHOWING SUPPRESSION OF
SIDE-WALLS.</p>

<p><b>STRUCTURAL PRINCIPLES.</b> The pointed arch, so commonly regarded
as the most characteristic feature of the Gothic styles, was merely an
incidental feature of their development. What really distinguished them
most strikingly was the systematic application of two principles which
the Roman and Byzantine builders had recognized and applied, but which
seem to have been afterward forgotten until they were revived by the
later Romanesque architects. The first of these was the <i>concentration
of strains</i> upon isolated points of support, made possible by the
substitution
<span class="pagenum">185</span>
<a name="page185" id="page185"> </a>
of groined for barrel vaults. This led to a corresponding concentration
of the masses of masonry at these points; the building was constructed
as if upon legs (Fig. 105). The wall became a mere filling-in between
the piers or buttresses, and in time was, indeed, practically
suppressed, immense windows filled with stained glass taking its place.
This is well illustrated in the <b>Sainte Chapelle</b> at Paris, built
1242&ndash;47 (Figs. 106, <a href="#fig122">122</a>). In this
remarkable edifice, a&nbsp;series of groined vaults spring from slender
shafts built against deep buttresses which receive and resist all the
thrusts. The wall-spaces between them are wholly occupied by superb
windows filled with stone tracery and stained glass. It would be
impossible to combine the materials used more scientifically or
effectively. The cathedrals of Gerona (Spain) and of Alby (France; <a
href="#fig123">Fig.&nbsp;123</a>) illustrate the same principle,
though in them the buttresses are internal and serve to separate the
flanking chapels.</p>

<p class="illustration floatleft w210">
<a name="fig107" id="fig107"> </a>
<img src="images/fig107.png" width="202" height="322"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 107.&mdash;EARLY GOTHIC FLYING BUTTRESS.</p>

<p>The second distinctive principle of Gothic architecture was that of
<i>balanced thrusts</i>. In Roman buildings the thrust of the vaulting
was resisted wholly by the inertia of mass in the abutments. In Gothic
architecture thrusts were as far as possible resisted by
counter-thrusts, and the final resultant pressure was transmitted by
flying half-arches across the intervening portions of the structure to
external buttresses placed at convenient points. This combination
<span class="pagenum">186</span>
<a name="page186" id="page186"> </a>
of flying half-arches and buttresses is called the
<i>flying-buttress</i> (Fig. 107). It reached its highest development in
the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries in the cathedrals of central and
northern France.</p>


<p><b>RIBBED VAULTING.</b> These two principles formed the structural
basis of the Gothic styles. Their application led to the introduction of
two other elements, second only to them in importance, <i>ribbed
vaulting</i> and the <i>pointed arch</i>.</p>

<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig108" id="fig108"> </a>
<img src="images/fig108.png" width="146" height="158"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 108.&mdash;RIBBED VAULT, ENGLISH TYPE, WITH DIVIDED GROIN-RIBS AND
RIDGE-RIBS.</p>

<p>The first of these resulted from the effort to overcome certain
practical difficulties encountered in the building of large groined
vaults. As ordinarily constructed, a&nbsp;groined vault like that in <a
href="#fig47">Fig.&nbsp;47</a>, must be built as one structure, upon
wooden centrings supporting its whole extent. The Romanesque architects
conceived the idea of constructing an independent skeleton of ribs. Two
of these were built against the wall (<i>wall-ribs</i>), two across the
nave (transverse ribs); and two others were made to coincide with the
groins (Figs. <a href="#fig98">98</a>, 108). The <i>groin-ribs</i>,
intersecting at the centre of the vault, divided each bay into four
triangular portions, or <i>compartments</i>, each of which was really an
independent vault which could be separately constructed upon light
centrings supported by the groin-ribs themselves. This principle, though
identical in essence with the Roman system of brick skeleton-ribs for
concrete vaults, was, in application and detail, superior to it, both
from the scientific and artistic point of view. The ribs, richly
moulded, became, in the hands of the Gothic architects, important
decorative features. In practice the builder gave to each set of ribs
independently the curvature he desired. The vaulting-surfaces were then
easily twisted or warped so as to fit the
<span class="pagenum">187</span>
<a name="page187" id="page187"> </a>
various ribs, which, being already in place, served as guides for their
construction.</p>


<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig109" id="fig109"> </a>
<img src="images/fig109.png" width="203" height="225"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 109.&mdash;PENETRATIONS AND INTERSECTIONS OF VAULTS.</p>

<p class="caption w210">
<i>a, a, Penetrations by small semi-circular vaults sprung from same
level. b, Intersection by small semi-circular vault sprung from higher
level; groins form wavy lines. c, Intersection by narrow pointed vault
sprung from same level; groins are plane curves.</i></p>

<p><b>THE POINTED ARCH</b> was adopted to remedy the difficulties
encountered in the construction of oblong vaults. It is obvious that
where a narrow semi-cylindrical vault intersects a wide one, it produces
either what are called <i>penetrations</i>, as at <i>a</i> (Fig. 109),
or intersections like that at&nbsp;<i>b</i>, both of which are awkward
in aspect and hard to construct. If, however, one or both vaults be
given a pointed section, the narrow vault may be made as high as the
wide one. It is then possible, with but little warping of the vaulting
surfaces, to make them intersect in groins&nbsp;<i>c</i>, which are
vertical plane curves instead of wavy loops like <i>a</i>
and&nbsp;<i>b</i>.</p>

<p>The Gothic architects availed themselves to the full of these two
devices. They built their groin-ribs of semi-circular or pointed form,
but the wall-ribs and the transverse ribs were, without exception,
pointed arches of such curvature as would bring the apex of each nearly
or quite to the level of the groin intersection. The pointed arch, thus
introduced as the most convenient form for the vaulting-ribs, was soon
applied to other parts of the structure.<!-- invisible . --> This was a
necessity with the windows and pier-arches, which would not otherwise
fit well the wall-spaces under the wall-ribs of the nave and aisle
vaulting.</p>


<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig110" id="fig110"> </a>
<img src="images/fig110.png" width="193" height="233"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 110.&mdash;PLATE TRACERY, CHARLTON-ON-OXMORE.</p>

<p><b>TRACERY AND GLASS.</b> With the growth in the size of the windows
and the progressive suppression of the lateral walls
<span class="pagenum">188</span>
<a name="page188" id="page188"> </a>
of vaulted structures, stained glass came more and more generally into
use. Its introduction not only resulted in a notable heightening and
enriching of the colors and scheme of the interior decoration, but
reacted on the architecture, intensifying the very causes which led to
its introduction. It stimulated the increase in the size of windows, and
the suppression of the walls, and contributed greatly to the development
of <i>tracery</i>. This latter feature was an absolute necessity for the
support of the glass. Its evolution can be traced (Figs, 110, 111, 112)
from the simple coupling of twin windows under a single hood-mould, or
discharging arch, to the florid net-work of the fifteenth century. In
its earlier forms it consisted merely of decorative openings, circles,
and quatrefoils, pierced through slabs of stone (<i>plate-tracery</i>),
filling the window-heads over coupled windows. Later attention was
bestowed upon the form of the stonework, which was made lighter and
richly moulded (<i>bar-tracery</i>), rather than upon that of the
openings (Fig. 111). Then the circular and geometric patterns employed
were abandoned for more flowing and capricious designs
(<i>Flamboyant</i> tracery, Fig. 112) or (in England) for more rigid and
rectangular arrangements (<i>Perpendicular</i>, <a href="#fig134">Fig.&nbsp;134</a>). It will be shown later that the periods
and styles of Gothic architecture are more easily identified by the
tracery than by any other feature.</p>


<p><b>CHURCH PLANS.</b> The original basilica-plan underwent radical
modifications during the 12th-15th centuries. These resulted in part
from the changes in construction
<span class="pagenum">189</span>
<a name="page189" id="page189"> </a>
which have been described, and in part from altered ecclesiastical
conditions and requirements. Gothic church architecture was based on
cathedral design; and the requirements of the cathedral differed in many
respects from those of the monastic churches of the preceding
period.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig111" id="fig111"> </a>
<img src="images/fig111.jpg" width="243" height="320"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 111.&mdash;BAR TRACERY, ST. MICHAEL’S, WARFIELD.</p>

<p>The most important alterations in the plan were in the choir and
transepts. The choir was greatly lengthened, the transepts often
shortened. The choir was provided with two and often four side-aisles,
and one or both of these was commonly carried entirely around the
apsidal termination of the choir, forming a single or double
<i>ambulatory</i>. This combination of choir, apse, and ambulatory was
called, in French churches, the <i>chevet</i>.</p>

<p>Another advance upon Romanesque models was the multiplication of
chapels&mdash;a&nbsp;natural consequence of the more popular character
of the cathedral as compared with the abbey. Frequently lateral chapels
were built at each bay of the side-aisles, filling up the space between
the deep buttresses, flanking the nave as well as the choir. They were
also carried around the <i>chevet</i> in most of the French cathedrals
(Paris, Bourges, Reims, Amiens, Beauvais, and many others); in many of
those in Germany (Magdeburg, Cologne, Frauenkirche at Treves), Spain
(Toledo, Leon, Barcelona,
<span class="pagenum">190</span>
<a name="page190" id="page190"> </a>
Segovia, etc.), and Belgium (Tournay, Antwerp). In England the choir had
more commonly a square eastward termination. Secondary transepts occur
frequently, and these peculiarities, together with the narrowness and
great length of most of the plans, make of the English cathedrals a
class by themselves.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig112" id="fig112"> </a>
<img src="images/fig112.png" width="254" height="256"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 112.&mdash;ROSE WINDOW, CHURCH OF ST. OUEN, ROUEN.</p>

<p><b>PROPORTIONS AND COMPOSITION.</b> Along with these modifications of
the basilican plan should be noticed a great increase in the height and
slenderness of all parts of the structure. The lofty clearstory, the
arcaded triforium-passage or gallery beneath it, the high pointed
pier-arches, the multiplication of slender clustered shafts, and the
reduction in the area of the piers, gave to the Gothic churches an
interior aspect wholly different from that of the simpler, lower, and
more massive Romanesque edifices. The perspective effects of the plans
thus modified, especially of the complex choir and <i>chevet</i> with
their lateral and radial chapels, were remarkably enriched and
varied.</p>

<p>The exterior was even more radically transformed by these changes,
and by the addition of towers and spires to the fronts, and sometimes to
the transepts and to their intersection with the nave. The deep
buttresses, terminating in pinnacles, the rich traceries of the great
lateral windows, the triple portals profusely sculptured, rose-windows
of great size under the front and transept gables, combined to produce
<span class="pagenum">191</span>
<a name="page191" id="page191"> </a>
effects of marvellously varied light and shadow, and of complex and
elaborate structural beauty, totally unlike the broad simplicity of the
Romanesque exteriors.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig113" id="fig113"> </a>
<img src="images/fig113.jpg" width="231" height="459"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 113.&mdash;FLAMBOYANT DETAIL FROM PULPIT IN STRASBURG
CATHEDRAL.</p>

<p><b>DECORATIVE DETAIL.</b> The mediæval designers aimed to enrich
every constructive feature with the most effective play of lights and
shades, and to embody in the decorative detail the greatest possible
amount of allegory and symbolism, and sometimes of humor besides. The
deep jambs and soffits of doors and pier-arches were moulded with a rich
succession of hollow and convex members, and adorned with carvings of
saints, apostles, martyrs, and angels. Virtues and vices, allegories of
reward and punishment, and an extraordinary world of monstrous and
grotesque beasts, devils, and goblins filled the capitals and
door-arches, peeped over tower-parapets, or leered and grinned from
gargoyles and corbels. Another source of decorative detail was the
application of tracery like that of the windows to wall-panelling, to
balustrades, to open-work gables, to spires, to choir-screens, and other
features, especially in
<span class="pagenum">192</span>
<a name="page192" id="page192"> </a>
the late fourteenth and fifteenth centuries (cathedrals of York, Rouen,
Cologne; Henry VII.’s Chapel, Westminster). And finally in the carving
of capitals and the ornamentation of mouldings the artists of the
thirteenth century and their successors abandoned completely the classic
models and traditions which still survived in the early twelfth
century.<!-- invisible . --> The later monastic builders began to look
directly to nature for suggestions of decorative form. The lay builders
who sculptured the capitals and crockets and finials of the early Gothic
cathedrals adopted and followed to its finality this principle of
recourse to nature, especially to plant life. At first the budding
shoots of early spring were freely imitated or skilfully
conventionalized, as being by their thick and vigorous forms the best
adapted for translation into stone (Fig. 114). During the thirteenth
century the more advanced stages of plant growth, and leaves more
complex and detailed, furnished the models for the carver, who displayed
his skill in a closer and more literal imitation of their minute
veinings and indentations (Fig. 115).
<span class="illustration floatleft">
<a name="fig114" id="fig114"> </a>
<img src="images/fig114.png" width="256" height="160"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 114.&mdash;EARLY GOTHIC CARVING.</span>
This artistic adaptation of natural forms to architectural decoration
degenerated later into a minutely realistic copying of natural foliage,
in which cleverness of execution took the place of original invention.
The spirit of display is characteristic of all late Gothic work.
Slenderness, minuteness of detail, extreme complexity and intricacy of
design, an unrestrained profusion of decoration covering every surface,
a&nbsp;lack of largeness and vigor in the conceptions, are conspicuous
traits of Gothic design in the fifteenth century,
<span class="pagenum">193</span>
<a name="page193" id="page193"> </a>
alike in France, England, Germany, Spain, and the Low Countries. Having
worked out to their conclusion the structural principles bequeathed to
them by the preceding centuries, the authors of these later works seemed
to have devoted themselves to the elaboration of mere decorative detail,
and in technical finish surpassed all that had gone before (Fig.
113).</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig115" id="fig115"> </a>
<img src="images/fig115.jpg" width="262" height="264"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 115.&mdash;CARVING, DECORATED PERIOD, FROM SOUTHWELL MINSTER.</p>


<p><b>CHARACTERISTICS SUMMARIZED.</b> In the light of the preceding
explanations Gothic architecture may be defined as that system of
structural design and decoration which grew up out of the effort to
combine, in one harmonious and organic conception, the basilican plan
with a complete and systematic construction of groined vaulting. Its
development was controlled throughout by considerations of stability and
structural propriety, but in the application of these considerations the
artistic spirit was allowed full scope for its exercise. Refinement,
good taste, and great fertility of imagination characterize the details
and ornaments of Gothic structures. While the Greeks in harmonizing the
requirements of utility and beauty in architecture approached the
problem from the æsthetic side, the Gothic architects did the same from
the structural side. Their admirably reasoned structures express as
perfectly the idea of vastness, mystery, and complexity as do the Greek
temples that of simplicity and monumental repose.</p>

<span class="pagenum">194</span>
<a name="page194" id="page194"> </a>
<p>The excellence of Gothic architecture lay not so much in its
individual details as in its perfect adaptation to the purposes for
which it was developed&mdash;its triumphs were achieved in the building
of cathedrals and large churches. In the domain of civil and domestic
architecture it produced nothing comparable with its ecclesiastical
edifices, because it was the requirements of the cathedral and not of
the palace, town-hall, or dwelling, that gave it its form and
character.</p>


<p><b>PERIODS.</b> The history of Gothic architecture is commonly
divided into three periods, which are most readily distinguished by the
character of the window-tracery. These periods were not by any means
synchronous in the different countries; but the order of sequence was
everywhere the same. They are here given, with a summary of the
characteristics of each.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Early Pointed Period.</span> [<i>Early
French</i>; <i>Early English</i> or <i>Lancet</i> Period in England;
<i>Early German</i>, etc.] Simple groined vaults; general simplicity and
vigor of design and detail; conventionalized foliage of small plants;
plate tracery, and narrow windows coupled under pointed arch with
circular foiled openings in the window-head. (In France, 1160 to
1275.)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Middle Pointed Period.</span>
[<i>Rayonnant</i> in France; <i>Decorated</i> or <i>Geometric</i> in
England.] Vaults more perfect; in England multiple ribs and liernes;
greater slenderness and loftiness of proportions; decoration much
richer, less vigorous; more naturalistic carving of mature foliage;
walls nearly suppressed, windows of great size, bar tracery with slender
moulded or columnar mullions and geometric combinations (circles and
cusps) in window-heads, circular (rose) windows. (In France, 1275 to
1375.)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Florid Gothic Period.</span>
[<i>Flamboyant</i> in France; <i>Perpendicular</i> in England.] Vaults
of varied and richly decorated design; fan-vaulting and pendants in
England, vault-ribs
<span class="pagenum">195</span>
<a name="page195" id="page195"> </a>
curved into fanciful patterns in Germany and Spain; profuse and minute
decoration and cleverness of technical execution substituted for dignity
of design; highly realistic carving and sculpture, flowing or flamboyant
tracery in France; perpendicular bars with horizontal transoms and
four-centred arches in England; “branch-tracery” in Germany. (In France,
1375 to 1525.)</p>




<span class="pagenum">196</span>
<a name="page196" id="page196"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXVI" id="chapXVI">CHAPTER XVI.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE IN FRANCE.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before, Adamy,
Corroyer, Enlart, Hasak, Moore, Reber, Viollet-le-Duc.<a class="tag"
name="tag20" id="tag20" href="#note20">20</a> Also Chapuy, <i>Le
moyen age monumental</i>. Chateau, <i>Histoire et caractères de
l’architecture française</i>. Davies, <i>Architectural Studies in
France</i>. Ferree, <i>The Chronology of the Cathedral Churches of
France</i>. Johnson, <i>Early French Architecture</i>. King, <i>The
Study book of Mediæval Architecture and Art</i>. Lassus and
Viollet-le-Duc, <i>Notre Dame de Paris</i>. Nesfield, <i>Specimens of
Mediæval Architecture</i>. Pettit, <i>Architectural Studies in
France</i>.</p>


<p><b>CATHEDRAL-BUILDING IN FRANCE.</b> In the development of the
principles outlined in the foregoing chapter the church-builders of
France led the way. They surpassed all their contemporaries in readiness
of invention, in quickness and directness of reasoning, and in artistic
refinement. These qualities were especially manifested in the
extraordinary architectural activity which marked the second half of the
twelfth century and the first half of the thirteenth. This was the great
age of cathedral-building in France. The adhesion of the bishops to the
royal cause, and their position in popular estimation as the champions
of justice and human rights, led to the rapid advance of the episcopacy
in power and influence. The cathedral, as the throne-church of the
bishop, became a truly popular institution. New cathedrals were founded
on every side, especially in the
<span class="pagenum">197</span>
<a name="page197" id="page197"> </a>
Royal Domain and the adjoining provinces of Normandy, Burgundy, and
Champagne, and their construction was warmly seconded by the people, the
communes, and the municipalities. “Nothing to-day,” says
Viollet-le-Duc,<a class="tag" name="tag21" id="tag21" href="#note21">21</a> “unless it be the commercial movement which has covered
Europe with railway lines, can give an idea of the zeal with which the
urban populations set about building cathedrals; .&nbsp;.&nbsp;.
a&nbsp;necessity at the end of the twelfth century because it was an
energetic protest against feudalism.” The collapse of the unscientific
Romanesque vaulting of some of the earlier cathedrals and the
destruction by fire of others stimulated this movement by the necessity
for their immediate rebuilding. The entire reconstruction of the
cathedrals of Bayeux, Bayonne, Cambray, Evreux, Laon, Lisieux, Le Mans,
Noyon, Poitiers, Senlis, Soissons, and Troyes was begun between 1130 and
1200.<a class="tag" name="tag22" id="tag22" href="#note22">22</a> The cathedrals of Bourges, Chartres, Paris, and Tours,
and the abbey of St. Denis, all of the first importance, were begun
during the same period, and during the next quarter-century those of
Amiens, Auxerre, Rouen, Reims, Séez, and many others. After 1250 the
movement slackened and finally ceased. Few important cathedrals were
erected during the latter half of the thirteenth century, the chief
among them being at Beauvais (actively begun 1247), Clermont, Coutances,
Limoges, Narbonne, and Rodez. During this period, and through the
fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, French architecture was concerned
rather with the completion and remodelling of existing cathedrals than
the founding of new ones. There were, however, many important parish
churches and civil or domestic edifices erected within this period.</p>


<p><b>STRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT: VAULTING.</b> By the middle of the twelfth
century the use of barrel-vaulting over the nave had been generally
abandoned and groined vaulting with
<span class="pagenum">198</span>
<a name="page198" id="page198"> </a>
its isolated points of support and resistance had taken its place. The
timid experiments of the Clunisian architects at Vézelay in the use of
the pointed arch and vault-ribs also led, in the second half of the
twelfth century, to far-reaching results. The builders of the great
<b>Abbey Church</b> of <b>St. Denis</b>, near Paris, begun in 1140 by
the Abbot Suger, appear to have been the first to develop these
tentative devices into a system. In the original choir of this noble
church all the arches, alike of the vault-ribs (except the groin-ribs,
which were semi-circles) and of the openings, were pointed and the
vaults were throughout constructed with cross-ribs, wall-ribs, and
groin-ribs. Of this early work only the chapels remain. In other
contemporary monuments, as for instance in the cathedral of Sens, the
adoption of these devices was only partial and hesitating.</p>


<p class="illustration float w120">
<a name="fig116" id="fig116"> </a>
<img src="images/fig116.png" width="127" height="341"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 116.&mdash;PLAN OF NOTRE DAME, PARIS.</p>

<p><b>NOTRE DAME AT PARIS.</b> The next great step in advance was taken
in the cathedral of <b>Notre Dame</b><a class="tag" name="tag23" id="tag23" href="#note23">23</a> at Paris (Figs. 116, 117, <a href="#fig125">125</a>). This was begun, under Maurice de Sully in 1163, on
the site of the twin cathedrals of Ste. Marie and St. Étienne, and the
choir was, as usual, the first portion erected. By 1196 the choir,
transepts, and one or two bays of the nave were substantially finished.
The completeness, harmony, and vigor of conception of this remarkable
church contrast strikingly with the makeshifts and hesitancy displayed
in many contemporary monuments
<span class="pagenum">199</span>
<a name="page199" id="page199"> </a>
in other provinces. The difficult vaulting over the radiating bays of
the double ambulatory was here treated with great elegance. By doubling
the number of supports in the exterior circuit of each aisle (Fig. 116)
each trapezoidal bay of the vaulting was divided into three easily
managed triangular compartments. Circular shafts were used between the
central and side aisles. The side aisles were doubled and those next the
centre were built in two stories, providing ample galleries behind a
very open triforium. The nave was unusually lofty and covered with
six-part vaults of admirable execution. The vault-ribs were vigorously
moulded and each made to spring from a distinct vaulting-shaft, of which
three rested upon the cap of each of the massive piers below (Fig. 117).
The <b>Cathedral</b> of <b>Bourges</b>, begun 1190, closely resembled
that of Paris in plan. Both were designed to accommodate vast throngs in
their exceptionally broad central aisles and double side aisles, but
Bourges has no side-aisle galleries, though the inner aisles are much
loftier than the outer ones. Though
<span class="pagenum">200</span>
<a name="page200" id="page200"> </a>
later in date the vaulting of Bourges is inferior to that of Notre Dame,
especially in the treatment of the trapezoidal bays of the
ambulatory.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig117" id="fig117"> </a>
<img src="images/fig117.jpg" width="367" height="262"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 117.&mdash;INTERIOR OF NOTRE DAME, PARIS.</p>

<p>The masterly examples set by the vault-builders of St. Denis and
Notre Dame were not at once generally followed. Noyon, Senlis, and
Soissons, contemporary with these, are far less completely Gothic in
style. At <b>Le Mans</b> the groined vaulting which in 1158 was
substituted for the original barrel-vault of the cathedral is of very
primitive design, singularly heavy and awkward, although nearly
contemporary with that of Notre Dame (Fig. 118).</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig118" id="fig118"> </a>
<img src="images/fig118.jpg" width="248" height="292"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 118.&mdash;LE MANS CATHEDRAL. NAVE.</p>


<p><b>DOMICAL GROINED VAULTING.</b> The builders of the South and West,
influenced by Aquitanian models, adhered to the square plan and domical
form of vaulting-bay, even after they had begun to employ groin-ribs.
The latter, as at first used by them in imitation of Northern examples,
had no organic function in the vault, which was still built like a dome.
About 1145&ndash;1160 the cathedral of <b>St. Maurice</b> at
<b>Angers</b> was vaulted with square, groin-ribbed vaults, domical in
form but not in construction. The joints no longer described horizontal
circles as in a dome, but oblique lines perpendicular to the groins and
meeting in zigzag lines at the ridge (Fig. 119). This method became
common in the West and was afterward generally adopted
<span class="pagenum">201</span>
<a name="page201" id="page201"> </a>
by the English architects. The <b>Cathedrals</b> of <b>Poitiers</b>
(1162) and <b>Laval</b> (La Trinité, 1180&ndash;1185) are examples of
this system, which at Le Mans met with the Northern system and produced
in the cathedral the awkward compromise described above.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig119" id="fig119"> </a>
<img src="images/fig119.png" width="243" height="199"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 119.&mdash;GROINED VAULT WITH ZIG-ZAG RIDGE-JOINTS.</p>

<p class="caption w240">
<i>a</i> shows a small section of filling with courses parallel to the
ridge, for comparison with the other compartments.<!-- invisible .
--></p>

<p><b>THIRTEENTH-CENTURY VAULTING.</b> Early in the thirteenth century
the church-builders of Northern France abandoned the use of square
vaulting-bays and six-part vaults. By the adoption of groin-ribs and the
pointed arch, the building of vaults in oblong bays was greatly
simplified. Each bay of the nave could now be covered with its own
vaulting-bay, thus doing away with all necessity for alternately light
and heavy piers. It is not quite certain when and where this system was
first adopted for the complete vaulting of a church. It is, however,
probable that the <b>Cathedral</b> of <b>Chartres</b>, begun in 1194 and
completed before 1240, deserves this distinction, although it is
possible that the vaults of Soissons and Noyon may slightly antedate it.
<b>Troyes</b> (1170&ndash;1267), <b>Rouen</b> (1202&ndash;1220),
<b>Reims</b> (1212&ndash;1242), <b>Auxerre</b> (1215&ndash;1234, nave
fourteenth century), <b>Amiens</b> (1220&ndash;1288), and nearly all the
great churches and chapels begun after 1200, employ the fully developed
oblong vault.</p>


<p><b>BUTTRESSING.</b> Meanwhile the increasing height of the
clearstories and the use of double aisles compelled the bestowal of
especial attention upon the buttressing. The nave and choir of Chartres,
the choirs of Notre Dame,
<span class="pagenum">202</span>
<a name="page202" id="page202"> </a>
Bourges, Rouen, and Reims, the chevet and later the choir of St. Denis,
afford early examples of the flying-buttress (<a href="#fig107">Fig.&nbsp;107</a>). These were at first simple and of moderate
height. Single half-arches spanned the side aisles; in Notre Dame they
crossed the double aisles in a single leap. Later the buttresses were
given greater stability by the added weight of lofty pinnacles. An
intermediate range of buttresses and pinnacles was built over the
intermediate piers where double aisles flanked the nave and choir, thus
dividing the single flying arch into two arches. At the same time a
careful observation of statical defects in the earlier examples led to
the introduction of subordinate arches and of other devices to stiffen
and to beautify the whole system. At <b>Reims</b> and <b>Amiens</b>
these features received their highest development, though later examples
are frequently much more ornate.</p>


<p class="illustration float w120">
<a name="fig120" id="fig120"> </a>
<img src="images/fig120.png" width="129" height="363"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 120.&mdash;ONE BAY, ABBEY OF ST. DENIS.</p>

<p><b>INTERIOR DESIGN.</b> The progressive change outlined in the last
chapter, by which the wall was practically suppressed, the windows
correspondingly enlarged, and every part of the structure made loftier
and more slender, resulted in the evolution of a system of interior
design well represented by the nave of Amiens. The second story or
gallery over the side aisle disappeared, but the aisle itself was very
high. The triforium was no longer a gallery, but a richly arcaded
passage in the thickness of the wall, corresponding to the roofing-space
over the aisle, and generally treated like a lower stage of the
clearstory. Nearly the whole space above it was occupied in each bay by
the vast clearstory window filled with simple but effective geometric
tracery over slender mullions. The side aisles were lighted by windows
which, like those in the clearstory, occupied nearly the whole available
wall-space under the vaulting. The piers and shafts were all clustered
and remarkably slender. The whole construction of this vast edifice,
which covers nearly eighty thousand square feet, is a marvel of
<span class="pagenum">203</span>
<a name="page203" id="page203"> </a>
lightness, of scientific combinations, and of fine execution. Its great
vault rises to a height of one hundred and forty feet. The nave of St.
Denis, though less lofty, resembles it closely in style (Fig. 120).
Earlier cathedrals show less of the harmony of proportion, the perfect
working out of the relation of all parts of the composition of each bay,
so conspicuous in the Amiens type, which was followed in most of the
later churches.</p>


<p><b>WINDOWS: TRACERY.</b> The clearstory windows of Noyon, Soissons,
Sens, and the choir of Vézelay (1200) were simple arched openings
arranged singly, in pairs, or in threes. In the cathedral of Chartres
(1194&ndash;1220) they consist of two arched windows with a circle above
them, forming a sort of plate tracery under a single arch. In the chapel
windows of the choir at Reims (1215) the tracery of mullions and circles
was moulded inside and out, and the intermediate triangular spaces all
pierced and glazed. Rose windows were early used in front and transept
façades. During the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries they were made
of vast size and great lightness of tracery, as in the transepts of
Notre Dame (1257) and the west front of Amiens (1288). From the design
of these windows is derived the name <i>Rayonnant</i>, often applied to
the French Gothic style of the period 1275&ndash;1375.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig121" id="fig121"> </a>
<img src="images/fig121.jpg" width="232" height="385"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 121.&mdash;THE STE. CHAPELLE, PARIS.</p>

<p><b>THE SAINTE CHAPELLE.</b> In this beautiful royal chapel at Paris,
built 1242&ndash;47, Gothic design was admirably exemplified in the
noble windows 15 by 50 feet in size, which perhaps furnished the models
for those of Amiens and&nbsp;St.
<span class="pagenum">204</span>
<a name="page204" id="page204"> </a>
Denis. Each was divided by slender mullions into four lancet-like lights
gathered under the rich tracery of the window-head. They were filled
with stained glass of the most brilliant but harmonious hues. They
occupy the whole available wall-space, so that the ribbed vault
internally seems almost to rest on walls of glass, so slender are the
visible supports and so effaced by the glow of color in the windows.
Certainly lightness of construction and the suppression of the
wall-masonry could hardly be carried further than here (Fig. 121). Among
other chapels of the same type are those in the palace of St.
Germain-en-Laye (1240), and a later example in the château of Vincennes,
begun by Charles VI., but not finished till 1525.</p>


<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig122" id="fig122"> </a>
<img src="images/fig122.png" width="145" height="329"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 122.&mdash;PLAN OF AMIENS CATHEDRAL.</p>

<p><b>PLANS.</b> The most radical change from the primitive basilican
type was, as already explained in the last chapter, the continuation of
the side aisles around the apse to form a <i>chevet</i>; and later, the
addition of chapels between the external buttresses. Radiating chapels,
usually semi-octagons or semi-decagons in plan, early appeared as
additions to the <i>chevet</i> (Fig. 122). These may have originated in
the apsidal chapels of Romanesque churches in Auvergne and the South, as
at Issoire, Clermont-Ferrand, Le Puy, and Toulouse.<!-- invisible . -->
<span class="pagenum">205</span>
<a name="page205" id="page205"> </a>
They generally superseded the transept-chapels of earlier churches, and
added greatly to the beauty of the interior perspective, especially when
the encircling aisles of the chevet were doubled. Notre Dame, as at
first erected, had a double ambulatory, but no chapels. Bourges has only
five very small semicircular chapels. Chartres (choir 1220) and Le Mans,
as reconstructed about the same date, have double ambulatories and
radial chapels. After 1220 the second ambulatory no longer appears.
Noyon, Soissons, Reims, Amiens, Troyes, and Beauvais, Tours, Bayeux, and
Coutances, Clermont, Limoges, and Narbonne all have the single
ambulatory and radiating chevet-chapels. The Lady-chapel in the axis of
the church was often made longer and more important than the other
chapels, as at Amiens, Le Mans, Rouen, Bayeux, and Coutances. Chapels
also flanked the choir in most of the cathedrals named above, and Notre
Dame and Tours also have side chapels to the nave. The only cathedrals
with complete double side aisles alike to nave, choir, and chevet, were
Notre Dame and Bourges. It is somewhat singular that the German
cathedral of Cologne is the only one in which all these various
characteristic French features were united in one design (see <a href="#fig140">Fig.&nbsp;140</a>).</p>

<p class="illustration float null">
<a name="fig123" id="fig123"> </a>
<img class="null" src="images/fig123a.png"
width="179" height="85" alt="see caption and text"></p>

<p class="illustration float">
<img src="images/fig123b.png" width="129" height="188"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 123.&mdash;PLAN OF<br>
CATHEDRAL OF ALBY.<!-- invisible . --></p>

<p>Local considerations had full sway in France, in spite of the
tendency toward unity of type. Thus Dol, Laon, and Poitiers have square
eastward terminations; Châlons has no ambulatory; Bourges no transept.
In Notre Dame the transept was almost suppressed. At Soissons one
transept, at Noyon both, had semicircular ends. <b>Alby</b>, a&nbsp;late
cathedral of brick,
<span class="pagenum">206</span>
<a name="page206" id="page206"> </a>
founded in 1280, but mostly built during the fourteenth century, has
neither side aisles nor transepts, its wide nave being flanked by
chapels separated by internal buttresses (Fig. 123).</p>


<p><b>SCALE.</b> The French cathedrals were nearly all of imposing
dimensions. Noyon, one of the smallest, is 333 feet long; Sens measures
354. Laon, Bourges, Troyes, Notre Dame, Le Mans, Rouen, and Chartres
vary from 396 to 437 feet in extreme length; Reims measures 483, and
Amiens, the longest of all, 521 feet. Notre Dame is 124 feet wide across
the five aisles of the nave; Bourges, somewhat wider. The central aisles
of these two cathedrals, and of Laon, Amiens, and Beauvais, have a span
of not far from 40 feet from centre to centre of the piers; while the
ridge of the vaulting, which in Notre Dame is 108 feet above the
pavement, and in Bourges 125, reaches in Amiens a height of 140 feet,
and of nearly 160 in Beauvais. This emphasis of the height, from 3 to 3½
times the clear width of the nave or choir, is one of the most striking
features of the French cathedrals. It produces an impressive effect, but
tends to dwarf the great width of the central aisle.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig124" id="fig124"> </a>
<img src="images/fig124.jpg" width="257" height="390"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 124.<!-- invisible both . -->&mdash;WEST FRONT OF NOTRE DAME,
PARIS.</p>

<p><b>EXTERIOR DESIGN.</b> Here, as in the interior, every feature had
its constructive <i>raison d’être</i>, and the total effect was
determined by the fundamental structural scheme. This was especially
true of the lateral elevations, in which the pinnacled buttresses, the
flying arches, and the traceried windows of the side aisle and
clearstory, repeated uniformly at each bay, were the principal elements
of the design.
<span class="pagenum">207</span>
<a name="page207" id="page207"> </a>
The transept façades and main front allowed greater scope for invention
and fancy, but even here the interior membering gave the key to the
composition. Strong buttresses marked the division of the aisles and
resisted the thrust of the terminal pier arches, and rose windows filled
the greater part of the wall space under the end of the lofty vaulting.
The whole structure was crowned by a steep-pitched roof of wood, covered
with lead, copper, or tiles, to protect the vault from damage by snow
and moisture. This roof occasioned the steep gables which crowned the
transept and main façades. The main front was frequently adorned, above
the triple portal, with a gallery of niches or tabernacles filled with
statues of kings. Different types of composition are represented by
Chartres, Notre Dame, Amiens, Reims, and Rouen, of which Notre Dame
(Fig. 124) and Reims are perhaps the finest. Notre Dame is especially
remarkable for its stately simplicity and the even balancing of
horizontal and vertical elements.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig125" id="fig125"> </a>
<img src="images/fig125.jpg" width="431" height="324"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 125.&mdash;WEST FRONT OF ST. MACLOU, ROUEN.<!-- invisible both .
--></p>

<p><b>PORCHES.</b> In most French church façades the porches were the
most striking features, with their deep shadows and sculptured
arches.<!-- invisible . --> The Romanesque porches were
<span class="pagenum">208</span>
<a name="page208" id="page208"> </a>
usually limited in depth to the thickness of the front wall. The Gothic
builders secured increased depth by projecting the portals out beyond
the wall, and crowned them with elaborate gables. The vast central door
was divided in two by a pier adorned with a niche and statue. Over this
the tympanum of the arch was carved with scriptural reliefs; the jambs
and arches were profusely adorned with figures of saints, apostles,
martyrs, and angels, under elaborate canopies. The porches of Laon,
Bourges, Amiens, and Reims are especially deep and majestic in effect,
the last-named (built 1380) being the richest of all. Some of the
transept façades also had imposing portals. Those of <b>Chartres</b>
(1210&ndash;1245) rank among the finest works of Gothic decorative
architecture, the south porch in some respects surpassing that of the
north transept. The portals
<span class="pagenum">209</span>
<a name="page209" id="page209"> </a>
of the fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries were remarkable for the
extraordinary richness and minuteness of their tracery and sculpture, as
at Abbeville, Alençon, the cathedral and St. Maclou at Rouen (Fig. 125),
Tours, Troyes, Vendôme, etc.</p>


<p><b>TOWERS AND SPIRES.</b> The emphasizing of vertical elements
reached its fullest expression in the towers and spires of the churches.
What had been at first merely a lofty belfry roof was rapidly developed
into the spire, rising three hundred feet or more into the air. This
development had already made progress in the Romanesque period, and the
south spire of Chartres is a notable example of late twelfth-century
steeple design. The transition from the square tower to the slender
octagonal pyramid was skilfully effected by means of corner pinnacles
and dormers. During and after the thirteenth century the development was
almost wholly in the direction of richness and complexity of detail, not
of radical constructive modification. The northern spire of Chartres
(1515) and the spires of Bordeaux, Coutances, Senlis, and the Flamboyant
church of St. Maclou at Rouen, illustrate this development. In Normandy
central spires were common, rising over the crossing of nave and
transepts. In some cases the designers of cathedrals contemplated a
group of towers; this is evident at Chartres, Coutances, and Reims. This
intention was, however, never realized; it demanded resources beyond
even the enthusiasm of the thirteenth century. Only in rare instances
were the spires of any of the towers completed, and the majority of the
French towers have square terminations, with low-pitched wooden roofs,
generally invisible from below. In general, French towers are marked by
their strong buttresses, solid lower stories, twin windows in each side
of the belfry proper&mdash;these windows being usually of great
size&mdash;and a skilful management of the transition to an octagonal
plan for the belfry or the spire.</p>


<span class="pagenum">210</span>
<a name="page210" id="page210"> </a>
<p><b>CARVING AND SCULPTURE.</b> The general superiority of French
Gothic work was fully maintained in its decorative details. Especially
fine is the figure sculpture, which in the thirteenth and fourteenth
centuries attained true nobility of expression, combined with great
truthfulness and delicacy of execution. Some of its finest productions
are found in the great doorway jambs of the west portals of the
cathedrals, and in the ranks of throned and adoring angels which adorned
their deep arches. These reach their highest beauty in the portals of
Reims (1380). The <i>tabernacles</i> or carved niches in which such
statues were set were important elements in the decoration of the
exteriors of churches.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig126" id="fig126"> </a>
<img src="images/fig126.png" width="434" height="205"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 126.&mdash;FRENCH GOTHIC CAPITALS.</p>

<p class="caption">
<i>a</i>, From Sainte Chapelle, Paris, 13th century. <i>b</i>,
14th-century capital from transept of Notre Dame, Paris. <i>c</i>,
15th-century capital from north spire of Chartres.</p>

<p>Foliage forms were used for nearly all the minor carved ornaments,
though grotesque and human figures sometimes took their place. The
gargoyles through which the roof-water was discharged clear of the
building, were almost always composed in the form of hideous monsters;
and symbolic beasts, like the oxen in the towers of Laon, or monsters
like those which peer from the tower balustrades
<span class="pagenum">211</span>
<a name="page211" id="page211"> </a>
of Notre Dame, were employed with some mystical significance in various
parts of the building. But the capitals corbels, crockets, and finials
were mostly composed of floral or foliage forms. Those of the twelfth
and thirteenth centuries were for the most part simple in mass, and
crisp and vigorous in design, imitating the strong shoots of early
spring. The <b>capitals</b> were tall and slender, concave in profile,
with heavy square or octagonal abaci. With the close of the thirteenth
century this simple and forcible style of detail disappeared. The
carving became more realistic; the leaves, larger and more mature, were
treated as if applied to the capital or moulding, not as if they grew
out of it. The execution and detail were finer and more delicate, in
harmony with the increasing slenderness and lightness of the
architecture (Fig. 126 <i>a</i>,&nbsp;<i>b</i>). <b>Tracery forms</b>
now began to be profusely applied to all manner of surfaces, and
open-work gables, wholly unnecessary from the structural point of view,
but highly effective as decorations, adorned the portals and crowned the
windows.</p>


<p><b>LATE GOTHIC MONUMENTS.</b> So far our attention has been mainly
occupied with the masterpieces erected previous to 1250. Among the
cathedrals, relatively few in number, whose construction is referable to
the second half of the century, that of <b>Beauvais</b> stands first in
importance. Designed on a colossal scale, its foundations were laid in
1225, but it was never completed, and the portion built&mdash;the choir
and chapels&mdash;belonged really to the second half of the century,
having been completed in 1270. But the collapse in 1284 of the central
tower and vaulting of this incomplete cathedral, owing to the excessive
loftiness and slenderness of its supports, compelled its entire
reconstruction, the number of the piers being doubled and the span of
the pier arches correspondingly reduced. As thus rebuilt, the cathedral
aisle was 47 feet wide from centre to centre of opposite piers, and 163
feet high to the top of the vault.
<span class="pagenum">212</span>
<a name="page212" id="page212"> </a>
Transepts were added after 1500. <b>Limoges</b> and <b>Narbonne</b>,
begun in 1272 on a large scale (though not equal in size to Beauvais),
were likewise never completed. Both had choirs of admirable plan, with
well-designed chevet-chapels. Many other cathedrals begun during this
period were completed only after long delays, as, for instance, Meaux,
Rodez (1277), Toulouse (1272), and Alby (1282), finished in the
sixteenth century, and Clermont (1248), completed under Napoleon III.
But between 1260 or 1275 and 1350, work was actively prosecuted on many
still incomplete cathedrals. The choirs of Beauvais (rebuilding),
Limoges, and Narbonne were finished after 1330; and towers,
transept-façades, portals, and chapels added to many others of earlier
date.</p>

<p>The style of this period is sometimes designated as <b>Rayonnant</b>,
from the characteristic wheel tracery of the rose-windows, and the
prevalence of circular forms in the lateral arched windows, of the late
thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries. The great rose windows in the
transepts of Notre Dame, dating from 1257, are typical examples of the
style. Those of Rouen cathedral belong to the same category, though of
later date. The façade of Amiens, completed by 1288, is one of the
finest works of this style, of which an early example is the elaborate
parish church of <b>St. Urbain</b> at Troyes.</p>


<p><b>THE FLAMBOYANT STYLE.</b> The geometric treatment of the tracery
and the minute and profuse decoration of this period gradually merged
into the fantastic and unrestrained extravagances of the
<b>Flamboyant</b> style, which prevailed until the advent of the
Renaissance&mdash;say 1525. The continuous logical development of forms
ceased, and in its place caprice and display controlled the arts of
design. The finest monument of this long period is the fifteenth-century
nave and central tower of the church of <b>St. Ouen</b> at Rouen,
a&nbsp;parish church of the first rank, begun in 1318, but not finished
<span class="pagenum">213</span>
<a name="page213" id="page213"> </a>
until 1515. The tracery of the lateral windows is still chiefly
geometric, but the western rose window (<a href="#fig112">Fig.&nbsp;112</a>) and the magnificent central tower or
lantern, exhibit in their tracery the florid decoration and wavy,
flame-like lines of this style. Slenderness of supports and the
suppression of horizontal lines are here carried to an extreme; and the
church, in spite of its great elegance of detail, lacks the vital
interest and charm of the earlier Gothic churches. The cathedral of
Alençon and the church of <b>St. Maclou</b> at Rouen, have portals with
unusually elaborate detail of tracery and carving; while the façade of
Rouen cathedral (1509) surpasses all other examples in the lace-like
minuteness of its open-work and its profusion of ornament. The churches
of <b>St. Jacques</b> at Dieppe, and of <b>St. Wulfrand</b> at
Abbeville, the façades of Tours and Troyes, are among the masterpieces
of the style. The upper part of the façade of Reims (1380&ndash;1428)
belongs to the transition from the Rayonnant to the Flamboyant. While
some works of this period are conspicuous for the richness of their
ornamentation, others are noticeably bare and poor in design, like St.
Merri and St. Séverin in Paris.</p>


<p><b>SECULAR AND MONASTIC ARCHITECTURE.</b> The building of cathedrals
did not absorb all the architectural activity of the French during the
Gothic period, nor did it by any means put an end to monastic building.
While there are few Gothic cloisters to equal the Romanesque cloisters
of Puy-en-Vélay, Montmajour, Elne, and Moissac, many of the abbeys
either rebuilt their churches in the Gothic style after 1150, or
extended and remodelled their conventual buildings. The cloisters of
Fontfroide, Chaise-Dieu, and the Mont St. Michel rival those of
Romanesque times, while many new refectories and chapels were built in
the same style with the cathedrals. The most complete of these Gothic
monastic establishments, that of the <b>Mont St. Michel</b> in Normandy,
presented a remarkable aggregation
<span class="pagenum">214</span>
<a name="page214" id="page214"> </a>
of buildings clustering around the steep isolated rock on which stands
the abbey church. This was built in the eleventh century, and the choir
and chapels remodelled in the sixteenth. The great refectory and
dormitory, the cloisters, lodgings, and chapels, built in several
vaulted stories against the cliffs, are admirable examples of the
vigorous pointed-arch design of the early thirteenth century.</p>

<p><b>Hospitals</b> like that of St. Jean at Angers (late twelfth
century), or those of Chartres, Ourscamps, Tonnerre, and Beaune,
illustrate how skilfully the French could modify and adapt the details
of their architecture to the special requirements of civil architecture.
Great numbers of charitable institutions were built in the middle
ages&mdash;asylums, hospitals, refuges, and the like&mdash;but very few
of those in France are now extant. Town halls were built in the
fifteenth century in some places where a certain amount of popular
independence had been secured. The florid fifteenth-century <b>Palais de
Justice</b> at <b>Rouen</b> (1499&ndash;1508) is an example of another
branch of secular Gothic architecture. In all these monuments the
adaptation of means to ends is admirable. Wooden ceilings and roofs
replaced stone, wherever required by great width of span or economy of
construction. There was little sculpture; the wall-spaces were not
suppressed in favor of stained glass and tracery; while the roofs were
usually emphasized and adorned with elaborate crestings and finials in
lead or terra-cotta.</p>


<p><b>DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURE.</b> These same principles controlled the
designing of houses, farm buildings, barns, granaries, and the like. The
common closely-built French city house of the twelfth and thirteenth
century is illustrated by many extant examples at Cluny, Provins, and
other towns. A&nbsp;shop opening on the street by a large arch,
a&nbsp;narrow stairway, and two or three stories of rooms lighted by
clustered, pointed-arched windows, constituted the common
<span class="pagenum">215</span>
<a name="page215" id="page215"> </a>
type. The street front was usually gabled and the roof steep. In the
fourteenth or fifteenth century half-timbered construction began to
supersede stone for town houses, as it permitted of encroaching upon the
street by projecting the upper stories. Many of the half-timbered houses
of the fifteenth century were of elaborate design. The heavy oaken
uprights were carved with slender colonnettes; the horizontal sills,
bracketed out over the street, were richly moulded; picturesque dormers
broke the sky-line, and the masonry filling between the beams was
frequently faced with enamelled tiles.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig127" id="fig127"> </a>
<img src="images/fig127.png" width="358" height="308"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 127.&mdash;HOUSE OF JACQUES CŒUR, BOURGES.<br>
<span class="caption">
(After Viollet-le-Duc.)</span></p>

<p>The more considerable houses or palaces of royalty, nobles, and
wealthy citizens rivalled, and in time surpassed, the monastic buildings
in richness and splendor. The earlier examples retain the military
aspect, with moat and donjon, as in the Louvre of Charles&nbsp;V.,
demolished in
<span class="pagenum">216</span>
<a name="page216" id="page216"> </a>
the sixteenth century. The finest palaces are of late date, and the type
is well represented by the Ducal Palace at Nancy (1476), the <b>Hotel de
Cluny</b> (1485) at Paris, the <b>Hotel Jacques Cœur</b> at Bourges
(Fig. 127), and the east wing of Blois (1498&ndash;1515). These palaces
are not only excellently and liberally planned, with large halls, many
staircases, and handsome courts; they are also extremely picturesque
with their square and circular towers, slender turrets, elaborate
dormers, and rich carved detail.</p>


<p class="monuments">
<b>MONUMENTS</b>: (C. = cathedral; A. = abbey; trans. = transept; each
edifice is given under the date of its commencement; subsequent
alterations in parentheses.) Between 1130 and 1200: Vézelay&nbsp;A.,
ante-chapel, 1130; St. Germer-de-Fly&nbsp;C., 1130&ndash;1150 (chapel
later); St. Denis&nbsp;A., choir, 1140 (choir rebuilt, nave and trans.,
1240); Sens&nbsp;C., 1140&ndash;68 (W.&nbsp;front, 13th century;
chapels, spire, 14th); Senlis&nbsp;C., 1145&ndash;83 (trans., spire,
13th century); Noyon&nbsp;C., 1149&ndash;1200 (W.&nbsp;front, vaults,
13th century); St. Germain-des-Prés&nbsp;A., Paris, choir, 1150
(Romanesque nave); Angers&nbsp;C., 1150 (choir, trans., 1274); Langres,
1150&ndash;1200; Laon&nbsp;C., 1150&ndash;1200; Le Mans&nbsp;C., nave,
1150&ndash;58 (choir, 1217&ndash;54); Soissons&nbsp;C., 1160&ndash;70
(choir, 1212; nave chapels, 14th century); Poitiers&nbsp;C.,
1162&ndash;1204; Notre Dame, Paris, choir, 1163&ndash;96 (nave,
W.&nbsp;front finished, 1235; trans. fronts, and chapels,
1257&ndash;75); Chartres&nbsp;C., W.&nbsp;end, 1170; rest, mainly
1194&ndash;98 (trans. porches, W.&nbsp;rose, 1210&ndash;1260;
N.&nbsp;spire, 1506); Tours&nbsp;C., 1170 (rebuilt, 1267; trans.,
portals, 1375; W.&nbsp;portals, chapels, 15th century; towers finished,
1507&ndash;47); Laval&nbsp;C., 1180&ndash;85 (choir, 16th century);
Mantes, church Notre Dame, 1180&ndash;1200; Bourges&nbsp;C.,
1190&ndash;95 (E.&nbsp;end, 1210; W.&nbsp;end, 1275); St. Nicholas at
Caen, 1190 (vaults, 15th century); Reims, church St. Rémy, choir, end of
12th century (Romanesque nave); church St. Leu d’Esserent, choir late
12th century (nave, 13th century); Lyons&nbsp;C., choir, end of 12th
century (nave, 13th and 14th centuries); Etampes, church Notre Dame,
12th and 13th centuries.&mdash;13th century: Evreux&nbsp;C.,
1202&ndash;75 (trans., central tower, 1417; W.&nbsp;front rebuilt, 16th
century); Rouen&nbsp;C., 1202&ndash;20 (trans. portals, 1280;
W.&nbsp;front, 1507); Nevers, 1211, N.&nbsp;portal, 1280 (chapels,
S.&nbsp;portal, 15th century); Reims&nbsp;C., 1212&ndash;42
(W.&nbsp;front, 1380; W.&nbsp;towers, 1420); Bayonne&nbsp;C., 1213
(nave, vaults, W.&nbsp;portal, 14th century); Troyes&nbsp;C., choir,
1214 (central tower, nave, W.&nbsp;portal, and towers, 15th century);
Auxerre&nbsp;C., 1215&ndash;34 (nave, W.&nbsp;end, trans., 14th
century); Amiens&nbsp;C., 1220&ndash;88; St. Etienne at
Chalons-sur-Marne, 1230 (spire, 1520); Séez&nbsp;C.,
<span class="pagenum">217</span>
<a name="page217" id="page217"> </a>
1230, rebuilt 1260 (remodelled 14th century); Notre Dame de Dijon, 1230;
Reims, Lady chapel of Archbishop’s palace, 1230; Chapel Royal at St.
Germain-en-Laye, 1240; Ste. Chapelle at Paris, 1242&ndash;47
(W.&nbsp;rose, 15th century); Coutances&nbsp;C., 1254&ndash;74;
Beauvais&nbsp;C., 1247&ndash;72 (rebuilt 1337&ndash;47; trans. portals,
1500&ndash;48); Notre Dame de Grace at Clermont, 1248 (finished 1350);
Dôl&nbsp;C., 13th century; St. Martin-des-Champs at Paris, nave 13th
century (choir Romanesque); Bordeaux&nbsp;C., 1260; Narbonne&nbsp;C.,
1272&ndash;1320; Limoges, 1273 (finished 16th century); St. Urbain,
Troyes, 1264; Rodez&nbsp;C., 1277&ndash;1385 (altered, completed 16th
century); church St. Quentin, 1280&ndash;1300; St. Benigne at Dijon,
1280&ndash;91; Alby&nbsp;C., 1282 (nave, 14th; choir, 15th century;
S.&nbsp;portal, 1473&ndash;1500); Meaux&nbsp;C., mainly rebuilt 1284
(W.&nbsp;end much altered 15th, finished 16th century); Cahors&nbsp;C.,
rebuilt 1285&ndash;93 (W.&nbsp;front, 15th century); Orléans,
1287&ndash;1328 (burned, rebuilt 1601&ndash;1829).&mdash;14th century:
St. Bertrand de Comminges, 1304&ndash;50; St. Nazaire at Carcassonne,
choir and trans. on Romanesque nave; Montpellier&nbsp;C., 1364; St. Ouen
at Rouen, choir, 1318&ndash;39 (trans., 1400&ndash;39; nave,
1464&ndash;91; W.&nbsp;front, 1515); Royal Chapel at Vincennes, 1385
(?)-1525.&mdash;15th and 16th century: St. Nizier at Lyons rebuilt; St.
Séverin, St. Merri, St. Germain l’Auxerrois, all at Paris; Notre Dame de
l’Epine at Chalons-sur-Marne; choir of St. Etienne at Beauvais;
Saintes&nbsp;C., rebuilt, 1450; St. Maclou at Rouen (finished 16th
century); church at Brou; St. Wulfrand at Abbeville; abbey of St.
Riquier&mdash;these three all early 16th century.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Houses, Castles, and Palaces</span>: Bishop’s palace at
Paris, 1160 (demolished); castle of Coucy, 1220&ndash;30; Louvre at
Paris (the original château), 1225&ndash;1350; Palais de Justice at
Paris, originally the royal residence, 1225&ndash;1400; Bishop’s palace
at Laon, 1245 (addition to Romanesque hall); castle Montargis, 13th
century; castle Pierrefonds, Bishop’s palace at Narbonnne, palace of
Popes at Avignon&mdash;all 14th century; donjon of palace at Poitiers,
1395; Hôtel des Ambassadeurs at Dijon, 1420; house of Jacques Cœur at
Bourges, 1443; Palace, Dijon, 1467; Ducal palace at Nancy, 1476; Hôtel
Cluny at Paris, 1490; castle of Creil, late 15th century, finished in
16th; E.&nbsp;wing palace of Blois, 1498&ndash;1515, for Louis XII.;
Palace de Justice at Rouen, 1499&ndash;1508.</p>

<div class="footnote">

<p><a name="note20" id="note20" href="#tag20">20.</a>
Consult especially articles <span class="smallcaps">Architecture</span>, <span class="smallcaps">Cathédrale</span>, <span class="smallcaps">Chapelle</span>, <span class="smallcaps">Construction</span>, <span class="smallcaps">Église</span>, <span class="smallcaps">Maison</span>,
<span class="smallcaps">Voûte</span>.</p>

<p><a name="note21" id="note21" href="#tag21">21.</a>
<i>Dictionnaire raisonné de l’architecture française</i>, vol. ii., pp.
280, 281.</p>

<p><a name="note22" id="note22" href="#tag22">22.</a>
See Ferree, <i>Chronology of Cathedral Churches of France</i>.</p>

<p><a name="note23" id="note23" href="#tag23">23.</a>
This cathedral will be hereafter referred to, for the sake of brevity,
by the name of <i>Notre Dame</i>. Other cathedrals having the same name
will be distinguished by the addition of the name of the city, as “Notre
Dame at Clermont-Ferrand.”</p>

</div>




<span class="pagenum">218</span>
<a name="page218" id="page218"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXVII" id="chapXVII">CHAPTER XVII.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE IN GREAT BRITAIN.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before, Corroyer,
Parker, Reber. Also, Bell’s Series of <i>Handbooks of English
Cathedrals</i>. Billings, <i>The Baronial and Ecclesiastical Antiquities
of Scotland</i>. Bond, <i>Gothic Architecture in England</i>. Brandon,
<i>Analysis of Gothic Architecture</i>. Britton, <i>Cathedral
Antiquities of Great Britain</i>. Ditchfield, <i>The Cathedrals of
England</i>. Murray, <i>Handbooks of the English Cathedrals</i>. Parker,
<i>Introduction to Gothic Architecture</i>; <i>Glossary of Architectural
Terms</i>; <i>Companion to Glossary</i>, etc. Rickman, <i>An Attempt to
Discriminate the Styles of English Architecture</i>. Sharpe,
<i>Architectural Parallels</i>; <i>The Seven Periods of English
Architecture</i>. Van Rensselaer, <i>English Cathedrals</i>. Winkles and
Moule, <i>Cathedral Churches of England and Wales</i>. Willis,
<i>Architectural History of Canterbury Cathedral</i>; ditto <i>of
Winchester Cathedral</i>; <i>Treatise on Vaults</i>.</p>


<p><b>GENERAL CHARACTER.</b> Gothic architecture was developed in
England under a strongly established royal power, with an episcopate in
no sense hostile to the abbots or in arms against the barons. Many of
the cathedrals had monastic chapters, and not infrequently abbots were
invested with the episcopal rank.</p>

<p>English Gothic architecture was thus by no means predominantly an
architecture of cathedrals. If architectural activity in England was on
this account less intense and widespread in the twelfth and thirteenth
centuries than in France, it was not, on the other hand, so soon
exhausted. Fewer new cathedrals were built, but the progressive
rebuilding of those already existing seems not to have ceased until the
middle or end of the fifteenth century. Architecture
<span class="pagenum">219</span>
<a name="page219" id="page219"> </a>
in England developed more slowly, but more uniformly than in France. It
contented itself with simpler problems; and if it failed to rival Amiens
in boldness of construction and in lofty majesty, it at least never
perpetrated a folly like Beauvais. In richness of internal decoration,
especially in the mouldings and ribbed vaulting, and in the picturesque
grouping of simple masses externally, the British builders went far
toward atoning for their structural timidity.</p>

<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig128" id="fig128"> </a>
<img src="images/fig128.png" width="143" height="295"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 128.&mdash;PLAN OF SALISBURY CATHEDRAL.</p>


<p><b>EARLY GOTHIC BUILDINGS.</b> The pointed arch and ribbed vault were
importations from France. Early examples appear in the Cistercian abbeys
of Furness and Kirkstall, and in the Temple Church at London (1185). But
it was in the <b>Choir of Canterbury</b>, as rebuilt by William of Sens,
after the destruction by fire in 1170 of Anselm’s Norman choir, that
these French Gothic features were first applied in a thoroughgoing
manner. In plan this choir resembled that of the cathedral of Sens; and
its coupled round piers, with capitals carved with foliage, its pointed
arches, its six-part vaulting, and its <i>chevet</i>, were distinctly
French. The Gothic details thus introduced slowly supplanted the round
arch and other Norman features. For fifty years the styles were more or
less mingled in many buildings, though <b>Lincoln Cathedral</b>, as
rebuilt in 1185&ndash;1200, retained nothing of the earlier round-arched
style. But the first church to be designed and built from the
foundations in the new style was the cathedral of <b>Salisbury</b>
(1220&ndash;1258; Fig. 128). Contemporary with Amiens, it is a
homogeneous and typical example of the
<span class="pagenum">220</span>
<a name="page220" id="page220"> </a>
Early English style. The predilection for great length observable in the
Anglo-Norman churches (as at Norwich and Durham) still prevailed, as it
continued to do throughout the Gothic period; Salisbury is 480 feet
long. The double transepts, the long choir, the square east end, the
relatively low vault (84 feet to the ridge), the narrow grouped windows,
all are thoroughly English. Only the simple four-part vaulting recalls
French models. <b>Westminster Abbey</b> (1245&ndash;1269), on the other
hand, betrays in a marked manner the French influence in its internal
loftiness (100 feet), its polygonal <i>chevet</i> and chapels, and its
strongly accented exterior flying-buttresses (<a href="#fig137">Fig.&nbsp;137</a>).</p>


<p><b>MIXTURE OF STYLES.</b> Very few English cathedrals are as
homogeneous as the two just mentioned, nearly all having undergone
repeated remodellings in successive periods. Durham, Norwich, and Oxford
are wholly Norman but for their Gothic vaults. Ely, Rochester,
Gloucester, and Hereford have Norman naves and Gothic choirs.
Peterborough has an early Gothic façade and late Gothic retro-choir
added to an otherwise completely Norman structure. Winchester is a
Norman church remodelled with early Perpendicular details. The purely
Gothic churches and cathedrals, except parish churches&mdash;in which
England is very rich&mdash;are not nearly as numerous in England as in
France.</p>


<p><b>PERIODS.</b> The development of English Gothic architecture
followed the same general sequence as the French, and like it the
successive stages were most conspicuously characterized by the forms of
the tracery.</p>

<p>The <span class="smallcaps">Early English</span> or <span class="smallcaps">Lancet</span> period extended roundly from 1175 or 1180 to
1280, and was marked by simplicity, dignity, and purity of design.</p>

<p>The <span class="smallcaps">Decorated</span> or <span class="smallcaps">Geometric</span> period covered another century, 1280 to
1380, and was characterized by its decorative richness and greater
lightness of construction.</p>

<p>The <span class="smallcaps">Perpendicular</span> period extended
from 1380, or
<span class="pagenum">221</span>
<a name="page221" id="page221"> </a>
thereabout, well into the sixteenth century. Its salient features were
the use of fan-vaulting, four-centred arches, and tracery of
predominantly vertical and horizontal lines. The tardy introduction of
Renaissance forms finally put an end to the Gothic style in England,
after a long period of mixed and transitional architecture.</p>


<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig129" id="fig129"> </a>
<img src="images/fig129.jpg" width="210" height="305"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 129.&mdash;RIBBED VAULTING, CHOIR OF EXETER CATHEDRAL.</p>

<p><b>VAULTING.</b> The richness and variety of English vaulting
contrast strikingly with the persistent uniformity of the French.
A&nbsp;few of the early Gothic vaults, as in the aisles of Peterborough,
and later the naves of Durham, Salisbury, and Gloucester, were simple
four-part, ribbed vaults substantially like the French. But the English
disliked and avoided the twisted and dome-like surfaces of the French
vaults, preferring horizontal ridges, and, in the filling-masonry,
straight courses meeting at the ridge in zigzag lines, as in southwest
France (see <a href="#page200">p.&nbsp;200</a>). This may be seen in
Westminster Abbey. The idea of ribbed construction was then seized upon
and given a new application. By springing a large number of ribs from
each point of support, the vaulting-surfaces were divided into long,
narrow, triangles, the filling of which was comparatively easy (Fig.
129). The ridge was itself furnished with a straight rib, decorated with
carved rosettes or <i>bosses</i> at each intersection with a
vaulting-rib. The naves and choirs of Lincoln, Lichfield, Exeter, and
the nave of Westminster
<span class="pagenum">222</span>
<a name="page222" id="page222"> </a>
illustrate this method. The logical corollary of this practice was the
introduction of minor ribs called <i>liernes</i>, connecting the main
ribs and forming complex reticulated and star-shaped patterns. Vaults of
this description are among the most beautiful in England. One of the
richest is in the choir of Gloucester (1337&ndash;1377). Less correct
constructively is that over the choir of Wells, while the choir of Ely,
the nave of Tewkesbury Abbey (Fig. 130), and all the vaulting of
Winchester as rebuilt by William of Wykeham (1390), illustrate the same
system. Such vaults are called <i>lierne</i> or <i>star</i> vaults.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig130" id="fig130"> </a>
<img src="images/fig130.jpg" width="435" height="265"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 130.&mdash;NET OR LIERNE VAULTING, TEWKESBURY ABBEY.</p>


<p><b>FAN-VAULTING.</b> The next step in the process may be observed in
the vaults of the choir of Oxford Cathedral (Christ Church), of the
retro-choir of Peterborough, of the cloisters of Gloucester, and many
other examples. The diverging ribs being made of uniform curvature, the
<i>severeys</i> (the inverted pyramidal vaulting-masses springing from
each support) became a species of concave conoids, meeting at the
<span class="pagenum">223</span>
<a name="page223" id="page223"> </a>
ridge in such a way as to leave a series of flat lozenge-shaped spaces
at the summit of the vault (<a href="#fig136">Fig.&nbsp;136</a>). The
ribs were multiplied indefinitely, and losing thus in individual and
structural importance became a mere decorative pattern of tracery on the
severeys. To conceal the awkward flat lozenges at the ridge, elaborate
panelling was resorted to; or, in some cases, long stone pendents were
inserted at those points&mdash;a&nbsp;device highly decorative but
wholly unconstructive. At Cambridge, in <b>King’s College Chapel</b>, at
Windsor, in <b>St. George’s Chapel</b>, and in the <b>Chapel of Henry
VII.</b> at Westminster, this sort of vaulting received its most
elaborate development. The <i>fan-vault</i>, as it is called,
illustrates the logical evolution of a decorative element from a
structural starting&mdash;point, leading to results far removed from the
original conception. Rich and sumptuous as are these ceilings, they are
with all their ornament less satisfactory than the ribbed vaults of the
preceding period.</p>


<p class="illustration float w270">
<a name="fig131" id="fig131"> </a>
<img src="images/fig131.jpg" width="263" height="271"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 131.&mdash;VAULT OF CHAPTER-HOUSE, WELLS.</p>

<p><b>CHAPTER-HOUSES.</b> One of the most beautiful forms of ribbed
vaulting was developed in the polygonal halls erected for the
deliberations of the cathedral chapters of Lincoln (1225), Westminster
(1250), Salisbury (1250), and Wells (1292), in which the vault-ribs
radiated from a central column to the sides and angles of the polygon
(Fig. 131). If
<span class="pagenum">224</span>
<a name="page224" id="page224"> </a>
these vaults were less majestic than domes of the same diameter, they
were far more decorative and picturesque, while the chapter-houses
themselves were the most original and striking products of English
Gothic art. Every feature was designed with strict regard for the
structural system determined by the admirable vaulting, and the Sainte
Chapelle was not more logical in its exemplification of Gothic
principles. To the four above-mentioned examples should be added that of
York (1280&ndash;1330), which differs from them in having no central
column: by some critics it is esteemed the finest of them all. Its
ceiling is a Gothic dome, 57 feet in diameter, but unfortunately
executed in wood. Its geometrical window-tracery and richly canopied
stalls are admirable.</p>


<p><b>OCTAGON AT ELY.</b> The magnificent <b>Octagon</b> of Ely
Cathedral, at the intersection of the nave and transepts, belongs in the
same category with these polygonal chapter-house vaults. It was built by
Alan of Walsingham in 1337, after the fall of the central tower and the
destruction of the adjacent bays of the choir. It occupies the full
width of the three aisles, and covers the ample space thus enclosed with
a simple but beautiful groined and ribbed vault of wood reaching to a
central octagonal lantern, which rises much higher and shows externally
as well as internally. Unfortunately, this vault is of wood, and would
require important modifications of detail if carried out in stone. But
it is so noble in general design and total effect, that one wonders the
type was not universally adopted for the crossing in all cathedrals,
until one observes that no cathedral of importance was built after
Walsingham’s time, nor did any other central towers opportunely fall to
the ground.</p>


<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig132" id="fig132"> </a>
<img src="images/fig132.jpg" width="154" height="195"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 132.&mdash;CLOISTERS, SALISBURY CATHEDRAL (SHOWING UPPER PART OF
CHAPTER-HOUSE).</p>

<p><b>WINDOWS AND TRACERY.</b> In the Early English Period
(1200&ndash;1280 or 1300) the windows were tall and narrow
(<i>lancet</i> windows), and generally grouped by twos and threes,
though sometimes four and even five are seen together (as
<span class="pagenum">225</span>
<a name="page225" id="page225"> </a>
the “Five Sisters” in the N.&nbsp;transept of York). In the nave of
Salisbury and the retro-choir of Ely the side aisles are lighted by
coupled windows and the clearstory by triple windows, the central one
higher than the others&mdash;a&nbsp;surviving Norman practice.
Plate-tracery was, as in France, an intermediate step leading to the
development of bar-tracery (see <a href="#fig110">Fig.&nbsp;110</a>).
The English followed here the same reasoning as the French. At first the
openings constituted the design, the intervening stonework being of
secondary importance. Later the forms of the openings were subordinated
to the pattern of the stone framework of bars, arches, circles, and
cusps. Bar-tracery of this description prevailed in England through the
greater part of the Decorated Period (1280&ndash;1380), and somewhat
resembled the contemporary French geometric tracery, though more varied
and less rigidly constructive in design. An early example of this
tracery occurs in the cloisters of Salisbury (Fig. 132); others in the
clearstories of the choirs of Lichfield, Lincoln, and Ely, the nave of
York, and the chapter-houses mentioned above, where, indeed, it seems to
have received its earliest development. After the middle of the
fourteenth century lines of double curvature were introduced, producing
what is called <i>flowing</i> tracery, somewhat resembling the French
flamboyant, though earlier in date (<a href="#fig111">Fig.&nbsp;111</a>). Examples of this style are found in Wells,
in the side aisles and triforium of the choir of Ely, and in the
S.&nbsp;transept rose-window of Lincoln.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig133" id="fig133"> </a>
<img src="images/fig133.jpg" width="245" height="351"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 133.&mdash;PERPENDICULAR TRACERY, WEST WINDOW OF ST. GEORGE’S,
WINDSOR.<!-- invisible . --></p>

<p><b>THE PERPENDICULAR STYLE.</b> Flowing tracery was, however,
a&nbsp;transitional phase of design, and was soon superseded by
<i>Perpendicular</i> tracery, in which the mullions were
<span class="pagenum">226</span>
<a name="page226" id="page226"> </a>
carried through to the top of the arch and intersected by horizontal
transoms. This formed a very rigid and mechanically correct system of
stone framing, but lacked the grace and charm of the two preceding
periods. The earliest examples are seen in the work of Edington and of
Wykeham in the reconstructed cathedral of Winchester (1360&ndash;1394),
where the tracery was thus made to harmonize with the accentuated and
multiplied vertical lines of the interior design. It was at this late
date that the English seem first to have fully appropriated the Gothic
ideas of emphasized vertical elements and wall surfaces reduced to a
minimum. The development of fan-vaulting had led to the adoption of a
new form of arch, the four-centred or <i>Tudor arch</i> (Fig. 133), to
fit under the depressed apex of the vault. The whole design internally
and externally was thenceforward controlled by the form of the vaulting
and of the openings. The windows were made of enormous size, especially
at the east end of the choir, which was square in nearly all English
churches, and in the west windows over the entrance. These windows had
already reached, in the Decorated Period, an enormous size, as at York;
in the Perpendicular Period the two ends of the
<span class="pagenum">227</span>
<a name="page227" id="page227"> </a>
church were as nearly as possible converted into walls of glass. The
East Window of Gloucester reaches the prodigious dimensions of 38 by 72
feet. The most complete examples of the Perpendicular tracery and of the
style in general are the three chapels already mentioned (<a href="#page223">p.&nbsp;223</a>); those, namely, of <b>King’s College</b> at
Cambridge, of <b>St. George</b> at Windsor, and of <b>Henry VII.</b> in
Westminster Abbey.</p>


<p><b>CONSTRUCTIVE DESIGN.</b> The most striking peculiarity of English
Gothic design was its studious avoidance of temerity or venturesomeness
in construction. Both the height and width of the nave were kept within
very moderate bounds, and the supports were never reduced to extreme
slenderness. While much impressiveness of effect was undoubtedly lost
thereby, there was some gain in freedom of design, and there was less
obtrusion of constructive elements in the exterior composition. The
flying-buttress became a feature of minor importance where the
clearstory was kept low, as in most English churches. In many cases the
flying arches were hidden under the aisle roofs. The English cathedrals
and larger churches are long and low, depending for effect mainly upon
the projecting masses of their transepts, the imposing square central
towers which commonly crown the crossing, and the grouping of the main
structure with chapter-houses, cloisters, and Lady-chapels.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig134" id="fig134"> </a>
<img src="images/fig134.jpg" width="249" height="324"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 134.&mdash;WEST FRONT, LICHFIELD CATHEDRAL.</p>

<p><b>FRONTS.</b> The sides and east ends were, in most cases, more
successful than the west fronts. In these the English displayed a
singular indifference or lack of creative power. They produced nothing
to rival the majestic façades of Notre Dame, Amiens, or Reims, and their
portals are almost ridiculously small. The front of <b>York</b>
Cathedral is the most notable in the list for its size and elaborate
decoration. Those of <b>Lincoln</b> and <b>Peterborough</b> are,
however, more interesting in the picturesqueness and singularity of
their composition. The first-named forms a vast arcaded
<span class="pagenum">228</span>
<a name="page228" id="page228"> </a>
screen, masking the bases of the two western towers, and pierced by
three huge Norman arches, retained from the original façade. The west
front of Peterborough is likewise a mask or screen, mainly composed of
three colossal recessed arches, whose vast scale completely dwarfs the
little porches which give admittance to the church. Salisbury has a
curiously illogical and ineffective façade. Those of <b>Lichfield</b>
and <b>Wells</b> are, on the other hand, imposing and beautiful designs,
the first with its twin spires and rich arcading (Fig. 134), the second
with its unusual wealth of figure-sculpture, and massive square
towers.</p>


<p><b>CENTRAL TOWERS.</b> These are the most successful features of
English exterior design. Most of them form lanterns internally over the
crossing, giving to that point a considerable increase of dignity.
Externally they are usually massive and lofty square towers, and having
been for the most part completed during the fourteenth and fifteenth
centuries they are marked by great richness and elegance of detail.
Durham, York, Ely, Canterbury, Lincoln, and Gloucester maybe mentioned
as notable examples of such square towers; that of Canterbury is the
finest. Two or three have lofty spires over the lantern. Among these,
that of Salisbury is chief, rising 424 feet from the ground, admirably
designed in every
<span class="pagenum">229</span>
<a name="page229" id="page229"> </a>
detail. It was not completed till the middle of the fourteenth century,
but most fortunately carries out with great felicity the spirit of the
earlier style in which it was begun. Lichfield and Chichester have
somewhat similar central spires, but less happy in proportion and detail
than the beautiful Salisbury example.</p>

<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig135" id="fig135"> </a>
<img src="images/fig135.png" width="175" height="369"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 135.&mdash;ONE BAY OF CHOIR, LICHFIELD CATHEDRAL.</p>


<p><b>INTERIOR DESIGN.</b> In the Norman churches the pier-arches,
triforium, and clearstory were practically equal. In the Gothic churches
the pier-arches generally occupy the lower half of the height, the upper
half being divided nearly equally between the triforium and clearstory,
as in Lincoln, Lichfield (nave), Ely (choir). In some cases, however (as
at Salisbury, Westminster, Winchester, choir of Lichfield), the
clearstory is magnified at the expense of the triforium (Fig. 135).
Three peculiarities of design sharply distinguish the English treatment
of these features from the French. The first is the multiplicity of fine
mouldings in the pier-arches; the second is the decorative elaboration
of design in the triforium; the third, the variety in the treatment of
the clearstory.<!-- invisible . --> In general the English interiors are
much more ornate than the French. Black Purbeck marble is frequently
used for the shafts clustered around the central core of the pier,
giving a striking and somewhat singular effect of contrasted color. The
rich vaulting, the highly decorated triforium, the moulded pier-arches,
and at the
<span class="pagenum">230</span>
<a name="page230" id="page230"> </a>
end of the vista the great east window, produce an impression very
different from the more simple and lofty stateliness of the French
cathedrals. The great length and lowness of the English interiors
combine with this decorative richness to give the impression of repose
and grace, rather than of majesty and power. This tendency reached its
highest expression in the Perpendicular churches and chapels, in which
every surface was covered with minute panelling.</p>


<p><b>CARVING.</b> In the Early English Period the details were carved
with a combined delicacy and vigor deserving of the highest praise. In
the capitals and corbels, crockets and finials, the foliage was crisp
and fine, curling into convex masses and seeming to spring from the
surface which it decorated. Mouldings were frequently ornamented with
foliage of this character in the hollows, and another ornament, the
<i>dog-tooth</i> or <i>pyramid</i>, often served the same purpose,
introducing repeated points of light into the shadows of the mouldings.
These were fine and complex, deep hollows alternating with round
mouldings (<i>bowtels</i>) sometimes made pear-shaped in section by a
fillet on one side. <i>Cusping</i>&mdash;the decoration of an arch or
circle by triangular projections on its inner edge&mdash;was introduced
during this period, and became an important decorative resource,
especially in tracery design. In the Decorated Period the foliage was
less crisp; sea-weed and oak-leaves, closely and confusedly bunched,
were used in the capitals, while crockets were larger, double-curved,
with leaves swelling into convexities like oak-galls. Geometrical and
flowing tracery were developed, and the mouldings of the tracery-bars,
as of other features, lost somewhat in vigor and sharpness. The
<i>ball-flower</i> or button replaced the dog’s-tooth, and the hollows
were less frequently adorned with foliage.</p>

<p>In the Perpendicular Period nearly all flat surfaces were panelled in
designs resembling the tracery of the windows.
<span class="pagenum">231</span>
<a name="page231" id="page231"> </a>
The capitals were less important than those of the preceding periods,
and the mouldings weaker and less effective. The Tudor rose appears as
an ornament in square panels and on flat surfaces; and moulded
battlements, which first appeared in Decorated work, now become a
frequent crowning motive in place of a cornice. There is less
originality and variety in the ornament, but a great increase in its
amount (Fig. 136).</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig136" id="fig136"> </a>
<img src="images/fig136.jpg" width="402" height="258"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 136.&mdash;FAN-VAULTING, HENRY VII.’S CHAPEL, WESTMINSTER
ABBEY.</p>


<p><b>PLANS.</b> English church plans underwent, during the Gothic
Period, but little change from the general types established previous to
the thirteenth century. The Gothic cathedrals and abbeys, like the
Norman, were very long and narrow, with choirs often nearly as long as
the nave, and almost invariably with square eastward terminations. There
is no example of double side aisles and side chapels, and apsidal
chapels are very rare. Canterbury and Westminster (Fig. 137) are the
chief exceptions to this, and both show clearly the French influence.
Another striking peculiarity of the English plans is the frequent
occurrence of secondary
<span class="pagenum">232</span>
<a name="page232" id="page232"> </a>
transepts, adding greatly to the external picturesqueness. These occur
in rudimentary form in Canterbury, and at Durham the Chapel of the Nine
Altars, added 1242&ndash;1290 to the eastern end, forms in reality a
secondary transept. This feature is most perfectly developed in the
cathedral of Salisbury (<a href="#fig128">Fig.&nbsp;128</a>), and
appears also at Lincoln, Worcester, Wells, and a few other examples. The
English cathedral plans are also distinguished by the retention or
incorporation of many conventual features, such as cloisters, libraries,
and halls, and by the grouping of chapter-houses and Lady-chapels with
the main edifice. Thus the English cathedral plans and those of the
great abbey churches present a marked contrast with those of France and
the Continent generally. While Amiens, the greatest of French
cathedrals, is 521 feet long, and internally 140 feet high, Ely measures
565 feet in length, and less than 75 feet in height. Notre Dame is 148
feet wide; the English naves are usually under 80 feet in total width of
the three aisles.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig137" id="fig137"> </a>
<img src="images/fig137.png" width="248" height="388"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 137.&mdash;EASTERN HALF OF WESTMINSTER ABBEY. PLAN.<br>
<span class="caption">
<i>a, Henry VII.’s chapel.</i></span></p>


<p><b>PARISH CHURCHES.</b> Many of these were of exceptional beauty of
composition and detail. They display the greatest variety of plan,
churches with two equal-gabled naves
<span class="pagenum">233</span>
<a name="page233" id="page233"> </a>
side by side being not uncommon. A&nbsp;considerable proportion of them
date from the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, and are chiefly
interesting for their square, single, west towers and their carved
wooden ceilings (see below). The tower was usually built over the
central western porch; broad and square, with corner buttresses
terminating in pinnacles, it was usually finished without spires.
Crenelated battlements crowned the upper story. When spires were added
the transition from the square tower to the octagonal spire was effected
by <i>broaches</i> or portions of a square pyramid intersecting the base
of the spire, or by corner pinnacles and flying-buttresses.</p>


<p class="illustration float w270">
<a name="fig138" id="fig138"> </a>
<img src="images/fig138.png" width="258" height="262"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 138.&mdash;ROOF OF NAVE, ST.&nbsp;MARY’S, WESTONZOYLAND.</p>

<p><b>WOODEN CEILINGS.</b> The English treated woodwork with consummate
skill. They invented and developed a variety of forms of roof-truss in
which the proper distribution of the strains was combined with a highly
decorative treatment of the several parts by carving, moulding, and
arcading. The ceiling surfaces between the trusses were handled
decoratively, and the oaken open-timber ceilings of many of the English
churches and civic or academic halls (Christ Church Hall, Oxford;
Westminster Hall, London) are such noble and beautiful works as quite to
justify the substitution of wooden for vaulted ceilings (Fig. 138). The
<i>hammer-beam</i> truss was in its way as highly scientific, and
æsthetically as satisfactory, as any feature of French Gothic
<span class="pagenum">234</span>
<a name="page234" id="page234"> </a>
stone construction. Without the use of tie-rods to keep the rafters from
spreading, it brought the strain of the roof upon internal brackets low
down on the wall, and produced a beautiful effect by the repetition of
its graceful curves in each truss.</p>


<p><b>CHAPELS AND HALLS.</b> Many of these rival the cathedrals in
beauty and dignity of design. The royal chapels at Windsor and
Westminster have already been mentioned, as well as King’s College
Chapel at Cambridge, and Christ Church Hall at Oxford. To these college
halls should be added the chapel of Merton College at Oxford, and the
beautiful chapel of St. Stephen at Westminster, most unfortunately
demolished when the present Parliament House was erected. The
Lady-chapels of Gloucester and Ely, though connected with the
cathedrals, are really independent designs of late date, and remarkable
for the richness of their decoration, their great windows, and elaborate
ribbed vaulting. Some of the halls in mediæval castles and manor-houses
are also worthy of note, especially for their timber ceilings.</p>


<p><b>MINOR MONUMENTS.</b> The student of Gothic architecture should
also give attention to the choir-screens, tombs, and chantries which
embellish many of the abbeys and cathedrals. The rood-screen at York is
a notable example of the first; the tomb of De Gray in the same
cathedral, and tombs and chantries in Canterbury, Winchester,
Westminster Abbey, Ely, St. Alban’s Abbey, and other churches are
deservedly admired. In these the English love for ornament, for minute
carving, and for the contrast of white and colored marble, found
unrestrained expression. To these should be added the market-crosses of
Salisbury and Winchester, and Queen Eleanor’s Cross at Waltham.</p>


<p><b>DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURE.</b> The mediæval castles of Great Britain
belong to the domain of military engineering rather than of the history
of art, though occasionally presenting
<span class="pagenum">235</span>
<a name="page235" id="page235"> </a>
to view details of considerable architectural beauty. The growth of
peace and civic order is marked by the erection of manor-houses, the
residences of wealthy landowners. Some of these houses are of imposing
size, and show the application to domestic requirements, of the late
Gothic style which prevailed in the period to which most of them belong.
The windows are square or Tudor-arched, with stone mullions and transoms
of the Perpendicular style, and the walls terminate in merlons or
crenelated parapets, recalling the earlier military structures. The
palace of the bishop or archbishop, adjoining the cathedral, and the
residences of the dean, canons, and clergy, together with the libraries,
schools, and gates of the cathedral enclosure, illustrate other phases
of secular Gothic work. Few of these structures are of striking
architectural merit, but they possess a picturesque charm which is very
attractive.</p>

<p>Not many stone houses of the smaller class remain from the Gothic
period in England. But there is hardly an old town that does not retain
many of the half-timbered dwellings of the fifteenth or even fourteenth
century, some of them in excellent preservation. They are for the most
part wider and lower than the French houses of the same class, but are
built on the same principle, and, like them, the woodwork is more or
less richly carved.</p>


<div class="monuments">

<p><b>MONUMENTS</b>: (A. = abbey church; C. = cathedral; r.&nbsp;=
ruined; trans. = transept; each monument is given under the date of the
earliest extant Gothic work upon it, with additions of later periods in
parentheses.)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Early English</span>: Kirkstall A.,
1152&ndash;82, first pointed arches; Canterbury&nbsp;C., choir,
1175&ndash;84 (nave, 1378&ndash;1411; central tower, 1500);
Lincoln&nbsp;C., choir, trans., 1192&ndash;1200 (vault, 1250; nave and
E.&nbsp;end, 1260&ndash;80); Lichfield&nbsp;C., 1200&ndash;50
(W.&nbsp;front, 1275; presbytery, 1325); Worcester&nbsp;C., choir,
1203&ndash;18, nave partly Norman (W.&nbsp;end, 1375&ndash;95);
Chichester&nbsp;C., 1204&ndash;44 (spire rebuilt 17th century);
Fountains&nbsp;A., 1205&ndash;46; Salisbury&nbsp;C., 1220&ndash;58
(cloister, chapter-h., 1263&ndash;84; spire, 1331); Elgin&nbsp;C.,
1224&ndash;44; Wells&nbsp;C., 1175&ndash;1206 (W.&nbsp;front 1225, choir
later, chapter-h., 1292); Rochester&nbsp;C., 1225&ndash;39
<span class="pagenum">236</span>
<a name="page236" id="page236"> </a>
(nave Norman); York&nbsp;C., S.<!-- invisible . --> trans., 1225;
N.&nbsp;trans., 1260 (nave, chapter-h., 1291&ndash;1345; W.&nbsp;window,
1338; central tower, 1389&ndash;1407; E.&nbsp;window, 1407); Southwell
Minster, 1233&ndash;94 (nave Norman); Ripon&nbsp;C., 1233&ndash;94
(central tower, 1459); Ely&nbsp;C., choir, 1229&ndash;54 (nave Norman;
octagon and presbytery, 1323&ndash;62); Peterborough&nbsp;C.,
W.&nbsp;front, 1237 (nave Norman; retro-choir, late 14th century);
Netley&nbsp;A., 1239 (r.); Durham&nbsp;C., “Nine Altars” and E.&nbsp;end
choir, 1235&ndash;90 (nave, choir, Norman; W.&nbsp;window, 1341; central
tower finished, 1480); Glasgow&nbsp;C., (with remarkable Early English
crypt), 1242&ndash;77; Gloucester&nbsp;C., nave vaulted, 1239&ndash;42
(nave mainly Norman; choir, 1337&ndash;51; cloisters, 1375&ndash;1412;
W.&nbsp;end, 1420&ndash;37; central tower, 1450&ndash;57);
Westminster&nbsp;A., 1245&ndash;69; St. Mary’s A., York, 1272&ndash;92
(r.).</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Decorated</span>: Merton College Chapel,
Oxford, 1274&ndash;1300; Hereford&nbsp;C., N.&nbsp;trans., chapter-h.,
cloisters, vaulting, 1275&ndash;92 (nave, choir, Norman);
Exeter&nbsp;C., choir, trans., 1279&ndash;91; nave, 1331&ndash;50
(E.&nbsp;end remodelled, 1390); Lichfield&nbsp;C., Lady-chapel, 1310;
Ely&nbsp;C., Lady-chapel, 1321&ndash;49; Melrose&nbsp;A., 1327&ndash;99
(nave, 1500; r.); St. Stephen’s Chapel, Westminster, 1349&ndash;64
(demolished); Edington church, 1352&ndash;61; Carlisle&nbsp;C.,
E.&nbsp;end and upper parts, 1352&ndash;95 (nave in part and
S.&nbsp;trans. Norman; tower finished, 1419); Winchester&nbsp;C.,
W.&nbsp;end remodelled, 1360&ndash;66 (nave and aisles, 1394&ndash;1410;
trans., partly Norman); York&nbsp;C., Lady-chapel, 1362&ndash;72;
churches of Patrington and Hull, late 14th century.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Perpendicular</span>: Holy Cross Church,
Canterbury, 1380; St. Mary’s, Warwick, 1381&ndash;91;
Manchester&nbsp;C., 1422; St. Mary’s, Bury St. Edmunds, 1424&ndash;33;
Beauchamp Chapel, Warwick, 1439; King’s College Chapel, Cambridge, 1440;
vaults, 1508&ndash;15; St. Mary’s Redcliffe, Bristol, 1442; Roslyn
Chapel, Edinburgh, 1446&ndash;90; Gloucester&nbsp;C., Lady-chapel,
1457&ndash;98; St. Mary’s, Stratford-on-Avon, 1465&ndash;91;
Norwich&nbsp;C., upper part and E.&nbsp;end of choir, 1472&ndash;99 (the
rest mainly Norman); St. George’s Chapel, Windsor, 1481&ndash;1508;
choir vaulted, 1507&ndash;20; Bath&nbsp;A., 1500&ndash;39; Chapel of
Henry VII., Westminster, 1503&ndash;20.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Academic and Secular Buildings</span>:
Winchester Castle Hall, 1222&ndash;35; Merton College Chapel, Oxford,
1274&ndash;1300; Library Merton College, 1354&ndash;78; Norborough Hall,
1356; Windsor Castle, upper ward, 1359&ndash;73; Winchester College,
1387&ndash;93; Wardour Castle, 1392; Westminster Hall, rebuilt,
1397&ndash;99; St. Mary’s Hall, Coventry, 1401&ndash;14; Warkworth
Castle, 1440; St. John’s College, All <ins class="correction" title="apostrophe in original">Soul’s</ins> College, Oxford, 1437; Eton
College, 1441&ndash;1522; Divinity Schools, Oxford, 1445&ndash;54;
Magdalen College, Oxford, 1475&ndash;80, tower, 1500; Christ Church
Hall, Oxford, 1529.</p>

</div>




<span class="pagenum">237</span>
<a name="page237" id="page237"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXVIII" id="chapXVIII">CHAPTER XVIII.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE IN GERMANY, THE NETHERLANDS, AND SPAIN.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before, Corroyer,
Reber. Also, Adler, <i>Mittelalterliche Backstein-Bauwerke des
preussischen Staates</i>. Essenwein (<i>Hdbuch. d. Arch.</i>), <i>Die
romanische und die gothische Baukunst; der Wohnbau</i>. Hasak, <i>Die
romanische und die gothische Baukunst; Kirchenbau</i>; <i>Einzelheiten
des Kirchenbaues</i> (both in <i>Hdbuch. d. Arch.</i>). Hase and others,
<i>Die mittelalterlichen Baudenkmäler Niedersachsens</i>. Kallenbach,
<i>Chronologie der deutschen mittelalterlichen Baukunst</i>. Lübke,
<i>Ecclesiastical Art in Germany during the Middle Ages</i>.
Redtenbacher, <i>Leitfaden zum Studium der mittelalterlichen
Baukunst</i>. Street, <i>Gothic Architecture in Spain</i>. Uhde,
<i>Baudenkmäler in Spanien</i>. Ungewitter, <i>Lehrbuch der gothischen
Constructionen</i>. Villa Amil, <i>Hispania Artistica y
Monumental</i>.</p>


<p><b>EARLY GOTHIC WORKS.</b> The Gothic architecture of Germany is less
interesting to the general student than that of France and England, not
only because its development was less systematic and more provincial,
but also because it produced fewer works of high intrinsic merit. The
introduction into Germany of the pointed style was tardy, and its
progress slow. Romanesque architecture had created imposing types of
ecclesiastical architecture, which the conservative Teutons were slow to
abandon. The result was a half-century of transition and a mingling of
Romanesque and Gothic forms. St. Castor, at Coblentz, built as late as
1208, is wholly Romanesque. Even when the pointed arch and vault had
finally come into general use, the plan and the constructive system
still remained predominantly Romanesque. The western apse and short
sanctuary of the earlier plans were retained. There was no triforium,
the
<span class="pagenum">238</span>
<a name="page238" id="page238"> </a>
clearstory was insignificant, and the whole aspect low and massive. The
Germans avoided, at first, as did the English, the constructive
audacities and difficulties of the French Gothic, but showed less of
invention and grace than their English neighbors. When, however, through
the influence of foreign models, especially of the great French
cathedrals, and through the employment of foreign architects, the Gothic
styles were at last thoroughly domesticated, a&nbsp;spirit of
ostentation took the place of the earlier conservatism. Technical
cleverness, exaggerated ingenuity of detail, and constructive <i>tours
de force</i> characterize most of the German Gothic work of the late
fourteenth and of the fifteenth century. This is exemplified in the
slender mullions of Ulm, the lofty and complicated spire of Strasburg,
and the curious traceries of churches and houses in Nuremberg.</p>


<p><b>PERIODS.</b> The periods of German mediæval architecture
corresponded in sequence, though not in date, with the movement
elsewhere. The maturing of the true Gothic styles was preceded by more
than a half-century of transition. Chronologically the periods may be
broadly stated as follows:</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">The Transitional</span>,
1170&ndash;1225.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">The Early Pointed</span>,
1225&ndash;1275.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">The Middle or Decorated</span>,
1275&ndash;1350.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">The Florid</span>, 1350&ndash;1530.</p>

<p>These divisions are, however, far less clearly defined than in France
and England. The development of forms was less logical and
consequential, and less uniform in the different provinces, than in
those western lands.</p>


<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig139" id="fig139"> </a>
<img src="images/fig139.png" width="195" height="354"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 139.&mdash;ONE BAY OF CATHEDRAL OF ST. GEORGE, LIMBURG.</p>

<p><b>CONSTRUCTION.</b> As already remarked, a&nbsp;tenacious hold of
Romanesque methods is observable in many German Gothic monuments. Broad
wall-surfaces with small windows and a general massiveness and lowness
of proportions were long preferred to the more slender and lofty forms
of true
<span class="pagenum">239</span>
<a name="page239" id="page239"> </a>
Gothic design. Square vaulting-bays were persistently adhered to,
covering two aisle-bays. The six-part system was only rarely resorted
to, as at Schlettstadt, and in St. George at Limburg-on-the-Lahn (Fig.
139). The ribbed vault was an imported idea, and was never
systematically developed. Under the final dominance of French models in
the second half of the thirteenth century, vaulting in oblong bays
became more general, powerfully influenced by buildings like Freiburg,
Cologne, Oppenheim, and Ratisbon cathedrals. In the fourteenth century
the growing taste for elaboration and rich detail led to the
introduction of multiplied decorative ribs. These, however, did not come
into use, as in England, through a logical development of constructive
methods, but purely as decorative features. The German multiple-ribbed
vaulting is, therefore, less satisfying than the English, though often
elegant. Conspicuous examples of its application are found in the
cathedrals of Freiburg, Ulm, Prague, and Vienna; in St. Barbara at
Kuttenberg, and many other important churches. But with all the richness
and complexity of these net-like vaults the Germans developed nothing
like the fan-vaulting or chapter-house ceilings of England.</p>


<p><b>SIDE AISLES.</b> The most notable structural innovation of the
Germans was the raising of the side aisles to the same height as the
central aisle in a number of important
<span class="pagenum">240</span>
<a name="page240" id="page240"> </a>
churches. They thus created a distinctly new type, to which German
writers have given the name of <i>hall-church</i>. The result of this
innovation was to transform completely the internal perspective of the
church, as well as its structural membering. The clearstory disappeared;
the central aisle no longer dominated the interior; the pier-arches and
side-walls were greatly increased in height, and flying buttresses were
no longer required. The whole design appeared internally more spacious,
but lost greatly in variety and in interest. The cathedral of <b>St.
Stephen</b> at Vienna is the most imposing instance of this treatment,
which first appeared in the church of St. Elizabeth at Marburg
(1235&ndash;83; Fig. 140). St. Barbara at Kuttenberg, St. Martin’s at
Landshut (1404), and the cathedral of Munich are others among many
examples of this type.</p>

<p class="illustration floatleft w240">
<a name="fig140" id="fig140"> </a>
<img src="images/fig140.png" width="224" height="252"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 140.&mdash;SECTION OF ST. ELIZABETH, MARBURG.</p>


<p><b>TOWERS AND SPIRES.</b> The same fondness for spires which had been
displayed in the Rhenish Romanesque churches produced in the Gothic
period a number of strikingly beautiful church steeples, in which
openwork tracery was substituted for the solid stone pyramids of earlier
examples. The most remarkable of these spires are those of Freiburg
(1300), Strasburg, and Cologne cathedrals, of the church at Esslingen,
St. Martin’s at Landshut, and the cathedral of Vienna. In these the
transition from the simple square tower below to the octagonal belfry
and spire is generally managed with skill. In the remarkable tower of
the cathedral
<span class="pagenum">241</span>
<a name="page241" id="page241"> </a>
at Vienna (1433) the transition is too gradual, so that the spire seems
to start from the ground and lacks the vigor and accent of a simpler
square lower portion. The over-elaborate spire of <b>Strasburg</b>
(1429, by Junckher of Cologne; lower parts and façade, 1277&ndash;1365,
by <i>Erwin von Steinbach</i> and his sons) reaches a height of 468
feet; the spires of Cologne, completed in 1883 from the original
fourteenth-century drawings, long lost but recovered by a happy
accident, are 500 feet high. The spires of <b>Ratisbon</b> and
<b>Ulm</b> cathedrals have also been recently completed in the original
style.</p>


<p><b>DETAILS.</b> German window tracery was best where it most closely
followed French patterns, but it tended always towards the faults of
mechanical stiffness and of technical display in over-slenderness of
shafts and mullions. The windows, especially in the “hall-churches,”
were apt to be too narrow for their height. In the fifteenth century
ingenuity of geometrical combinations took the place of grace of line,
and later the tracery was often tortured into a stone caricature of
rustic-work of interlaced and twisted boughs and twigs, represented with
all their bark and knots (<i>branch-tracery</i>). The execution was far
superior to the design. The carving of foliage in capitals, finials,
etc., calls for no special mention for its originality or its departure
from French types.</p>


<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig141" id="fig141"> </a>
<img src="images/fig141.png" width="176" height="308"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 141.&mdash;COLOGNE CATHEDRAL. PLAN.</p>

<p><b>PLANS.</b> In these there was more variety than in any other part
of Europe except Italy. Some churches, like Naumburg, retained the
Romanesque system of a second western apse and short choir. The
Cistercian churches generally had square east ends, while the polygonal
eastern apse without ambulatory is seen in St. Elizabeth at Marburg, the
cathedrals of Ratisbon, Ulm and Vienna, and many other churches. The
introduction of French ideas in the thirteenth century led to the
adoption in a number of cases of the chevet with a single ambulatory and
a series of
<span class="pagenum">242</span>
<a name="page242" id="page242"> </a>
radiating apsidal chapels. <b>Magdeburg</b> cathedral (1208&ndash;11)
was the first erected on this plan, which was later followed at
Altenburg, Cologne, Freiburg, Lübeck, Prague and Zwettl, in St. Francis
at Salzburg and some other churches. Side chapels to nave or choir
appear in the cathedrals of Lübeck, Munich, Oppenheim, Prague and
Zwettl. <b>Cologne</b> <b>Cathedral</b>, by far the largest and most
magnificent of all, is completely French in plan, uniting in one design
the leading characteristics of the most notable French churches (Fig.
141). It has complete double aisles in both nave and choir, three-aisled
transepts, radial chevet-chapels and twin western towers. The ambulatory
is, however, single, and there are no lateral chapels. A&nbsp;typical
German treatment was the eastward termination of the church by polygonal
chapels, one in the axis of each aisle, the central one projecting
beyond its neighbors. Where there were five aisles, as at Xanten, the
effect was particularly fine. The plan of the curious polygonal church
of <b>Our Lady</b> (Liebfrauenkirche; 1227&ndash;43) built on the site
of the ancient circular baptistery at Treves, would seem to have been
produced by doubling such an arrangement on either side of the
transverse axis (Fig. 142).</p>


<p class="illustration floatleft w180">
<a name="fig142" id="fig142"> </a>
<img src="images/fig142.png" width="193" height="244"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 142.&mdash;CHURCH OF OUR LADY, TREVES.</p>

<p><b>HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT.</b> The so-called <b>Golden Portal</b> of
<b>Freiburg</b> in the Erzgebirge is perhaps the first distinctively
Gothic work in Germany, dating from 1190. From that time on, Gothic
details appeared with increasing frequency, especially in the Rhine
provinces, as shown in many
<span class="pagenum">243</span>
<a name="page243" id="page243"> </a>
transitional structures. <b>Gelnhausen</b> and Aschaffenburg are early
13th-century examples; pointed arches and vaults appear in the Apostles’
and St. Martin’s churches at Cologne; and the great church of <b>St.
Peter and St. Paul</b> at Neuweiler in Alsace has an almost purely
Gothic nave of the same period. The churches of <b>Bamberg</b>,
<b>Fritzlar</b>, and <b>Naumburg</b>, and in Westphalia those of
<b>Münster</b> and <b>Osnabrück</b>, are important examples of the
transition. The French influence, especially the Burgundian, appears as
early as 1212 in the cathedral of Magdeburg, imitating the choir of
Soissons, and in the structural design of the Liebfrauenkirche at Treves
as already mentioned; it reached complete ascendancy in Alsace at
<b>Strasburg</b> (nave 1240&ndash;75), in Baden at <b>Freiburg</b> (nave
1270) and in Prussia at <b>Cologne</b> (1248&ndash;1320). Strasburg
Cathedral is especially remarkable for its façade, the work of Erwin von
Steinbach and his sons (1277&ndash;1346), designed after French models,
and its north spire, built in the fifteenth century. Cologne Cathedral,
begun in 1248 by <i>Gerhard of Riel</i> in imitation of the newly
completed choir of Amiens, was continued by Master <i>Arnold</i> and his
son <i>John</i>, and the choir was consecrated in 1322. The nave and
W.&nbsp;front were built during the first half of the 14th century,
though the towers were not completed till 1883.
<span class="illustration">
<a name="fig143" id="fig143"> </a>
<img src="images/fig143.png" width="120" height="293"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 143.<!-- invisible . -->&mdash;PLAN OF<br>
ULM CATHEDRAL.</span>
In spite of its vast size and slow construction, it is in style the most
uniform of all great Gothic cathedrals, as it is the most lofty
(excepting the choir of Beauvais) and the largest excepting Milan and
<span class="pagenum">244</span>
<a name="page244" id="page244"> </a>
Seville. Unfortunately its details, though pure and correct, are
singularly dry and mechanical, while its very uniformity deprives it of
the picturesque and varied charm which results from a mixture of styles
recording the labors of successive generations. The same criticism may
be raised against the late cathedral of <b>Ulm</b> (choir,
1377&ndash;1449; nave, 1477; Fig. 143). The Cologne influence is
observable in the widely separated cathedrals of Utrecht in the
Netherlands, Metz in the W., Minden and <b>Halberstadt</b> (begun 1250;
mainly built after 1327) in Saxony, and in the S. in the church of
<b>St. Catherine</b> at Oppenheim. To the E. and&nbsp;S., in the
cathedrals of <b>Prague</b> (Bohemia) by <i>Matthew of Arras</i>
(1344&ndash;52) and <b>Ratisbon</b> (or Regensburg, 1275) the French
influence predominates, at least in the details and construction. The
last-named is one of the most dignified and beautiful of German Gothic
churches&mdash;German in plan, French in execution. The French influence
also manifests itself in the details of many of the peculiarly German
churches with aisles of equal height (see <a href="#page240">p.&nbsp;240</a>).</p>

<p>More peculiarly German are the brick churches of North Germany, where
stone was almost wholly lacking. In these, flat walls, square towers,
and decoration by colored tiles and bricks are characteristic, as at
Brandenburg (St. Godehard and <b>St. Catherine</b>, 1346&ndash;1400), at
<b>Prentzlau</b>, Tängermünde, Königsberg, &amp;c. Lübeck possesses
notable monuments of brick architecture in the churches of <b>St.
Mary</b> and St. Catherine, both much alike in plan and in the flat and
barren simplicity of their exteriors. <b>St. Martin’s</b> at
<b>Landshut</b> in the South is also a notable brick church.</p>


<span class="pagenum">245</span>
<a name="page245" id="page245"> </a>
<p><b>LATE GOTHIC.</b> As in France and England, the fourteenth and
fifteenth centuries were mainly occupied with the completion of existing
churches, many of which, up to that time, were still without naves. The
works of this period show the exaggerated attenuation of detail already
alluded to, though their richness and elegance sometimes atone for their
mechanical character. The complicated ribbed vaults of this period are
among its most striking features (see <a href="#page239">p.&nbsp;239</a>). Spire-building was as general as was the
erection of central square towers in England, during the same period. To
this time also belong the overloaded traceries and minute detail of the
<b>St. Sebald</b> and St. Lorenz churches and of several secular
buildings at Nuremberg, the façade of Chemnitz Cathedral, and similar
works. The nave and tower of St. Stephen at Vienna (1359&ndash;1433),
the church of Sta. Maria in Gestade in the same city, and the cathedral
of Kaschau in Hungary, are Austrian masterpieces of late Gothic
design.</p>


<p><b>SECULAR BUILDINGS.</b> Germany possesses a number of important
examples of secular Gothic work, chiefly municipal buildings (gates and
town halls) and castles. The first completely Gothic castle or palace
was not built until 1280, at <b>Marienburg</b> (Prussia), and was
completed a century later. It consists of two courts, the earlier of the
two forming a closed square and containing the chapel and chapter-house
of the Order of the German knights. The later and larger court is less
regular, its chief feature being the <b>Great Hall</b> of the Order, in
two aisles. All the vaulting is of the richest multiple-ribbed type.
Other castles are at Marienwerder, Heilsberg (1350) in E.&nbsp;Prussia,
Karlstein in Bohemia (1347), and the <b>Albrechtsburg</b> at Meissen in
Saxony (1471&ndash;83).</p>

<p>Among town halls, most of which date from the fourteenth and
fifteenth centuries may be mentioned those of Ratisbon (Regensburg),
Münster and Hildesheim, Halberstadt,
<span class="pagenum">246</span>
<a name="page246" id="page246"> </a>
<b>Brunswick</b>, Lübeck, and Bremen&mdash;the last two of brick. These,
and the city gates, such as the <b>Spahlenthor</b> at Basle
(Switzerland) and others at Lübeck and Wismar, are generally very
picturesque edifices. Many fine guildhalls were also built during the
last two centuries of the Gothic style; and dwelling-houses of the same
period, of quaint and effective design, with stepped or traceried
gables, lofty roofs, openwork balconies and corner turrets, are to be
found in many cities. Nuremberg is especially rich in these.</p>


<p><b>THE NETHERLANDS</b>, as might be expected from their position,
underwent the influences of both France and Germany. During the
thirteenth century, largely through the intimate monastic relations
between Tournay and Noyon, the French influence became paramount in what
is now Belgium, while Holland remained more strongly German in style. Of
the two countries Belgium developed by far the most interesting
architecture. Some of its cathedrals, notably those of Tournay, Antwerp,
Brussels, Malines (Mechlin), Mons and Louvain, rank high among
structures of their class, both in scale and in artistic treatment. The
Flemish town halls and guildhalls merit particular attention for their
size and richness, exemplifying in a worthy manner the wealth,
prosperity, and independence of the weavers and merchants of Antwerp,
Ypres, Ghent (Gand), Louvain, and other cities in the fifteenth
century.</p>


<p><b>CATHEDRALS AND CHURCHES.</b> The earliest purely Gothic edifice in
Belgium was the choir of <b>Ste. Gudule</b> (1225) at Brussels, followed
in 1242 by the choir and transepts of <b>Tournay</b>, designed with
pointed vaults, side chapels, and a complete <i>chevet</i>. The
transept-ends are round, as at Noyon. It was surpassed in splendor by
the <b>Cathedral</b> of <b>Antwerp</b> (1352&ndash;1422), remarkable for
its seven-aisled nave and narrow transepts. It covers some 70,000 square
feet, but its great size is not as effective internally as it should be,
owing to the poverty of the details and the lack
<span class="pagenum">247</span>
<a name="page247" id="page247"> </a>
of finely felt proportion in the various parts. The late west front
(1422&ndash;1518) displays the florid taste of the wealthy Flemish
burgher population of that period, but is so rich and elegant,
especially its lofty and slender north spire, that its over-decoration
is pardonable. The cathedral of <b>St. Rombaut</b> at Malines (choir,
1366; nave, 1454&ndash;64) is a more satisfactory church, though smaller
and with its western towers incomplete. The cathedral of <b>Louvain</b>
belongs to the same period (1373&ndash;1433). <b>St. Wandru</b> at Mons
(1450&ndash;1528) and <b>St. Jacques</b> at Liège (1522&ndash;58) are
interesting parish churches of the first rank, remarkable especially for
the use of color in their internal decoration, for their late tracery
and ribbed vaulting, and for the absence of Renaissance details at that
late period.</p>


<p><b>TOWN HALLS: GUILDHALLS.</b> These were really the most
characteristic Flemish edifices, and are in most cases the most
conspicuous monuments of their respective cities. The <b>Cloth Hall</b>
of <b>Ypres</b> (1304) is the earliest and most imposing among them;
similar halls were built not much later at <b>Bruges</b>,
<b>Louvain</b>, <b>Malines</b> and <b>Ghent</b>. The town halls were
mostly of later date, the earliest being that of <b>Bruges</b> (1377).
The town halls of <b>Brussels</b> with its imposing
<span class="pagenum">248</span>
<a name="page248" id="page248"> </a>
and graceful tower, of <b>Louvain</b> (1448&ndash;63; Fig. 144) and of
<b>Oudenärde</b> (early 16th century) are conspicuous monuments of this
class.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig144" id="fig144"> </a>
<img src="images/fig144.jpg" width="262" height="352"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 144.&mdash;TOWN HALL, LOUVAIN.</p>

<p>In general, the Gothic architecture of Belgium presents the traits of
a borrowed style, which did not undergo at the hands of its borrowers
any radically novel or fundamental development. The structural design is
usually lacking in vigor and organic significance, but the details are
often graceful and well designed, especially on the exterior. The
tendency was often towards over-elaboration, particularly in the later
works.</p>

<p>The Gothic architecture of <b>Holland</b> and of the
<b>Scandinavian</b> countries offers so little that is highly artistic
or inspiring in character, that space cannot well be given in this work,
even to an enumeration of its chief monuments.</p>


<p><b>SPAIN AND PORTUGAL.</b> The beginnings of Gothic architecture in
Spain followed close on the series of campaigns from 1217 to 1252, which
began the overthrow of the Moorish dominion. With the resulting spirit
of exultation and the wealth accruing from booty, came a rapid
development of architecture, mainly under French influence. Gothic
architecture was at this date, under St. Louis, producing in France some
of its noblest works. The great cathedrals of <b>Toledo</b> and
<b>Burgos</b>, begun between 1220 and 1230, were the earliest purely
Gothic churches in Spain. <b>San Vincente</b> at Avila and the <b>Old
Cathedral</b> at Salamanca, of somewhat earlier date, present a mixture
of round- and pointed-arched forms, with the Romanesque elements
predominant. <b>Toledo Cathedral</b>, planned in imitation of Notre Dame
and Bourges, but exceeding them in width, covers 75,000 square feet, and
thus ranks among the largest of European cathedrals. Internally it is
well proportioned and well detailed, recalling the early French
masterworks, but its exterior is less commendable.</p>

<span class="pagenum">249</span>
<a name="page249" id="page249"> </a>
<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig145" id="fig145"> </a>
<img src="images/fig145.jpg" width="261" height="334"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 145.<!-- invisible both . -->&mdash;FAÇADE OF BURGOS CATHEDRAL.</p>

<p>In the contemporary cathedral of Burgos the exterior is at least as
interesting as the interior. The west front, of German design, suggests
Cologne by its twin openwork spires (Fig. 145); while the crossing is
embellished with a sumptuous dome and lantern or <i>cimborio</i>, added
as late as 1567. The chapels at the east end, especially that of the
Condestabile (1487), are ornate to the point of overloading,
a&nbsp;fault to which late Spanish Gothic work is peculiarly prone.
Other thirteenth-century cathedrals are those of <b>Leon</b> (1260),
<b>Valencia</b> (1262), and <b>Barcelona</b> (1298), all exhibiting
strongly the French influence in the plan, vaulting, and vertical
proportions. The models of Bourges and Paris with their wide naves,
lateral chapels and semicircular chevets were followed in the cathedral
of Barcelona, in a number of fourteenth-century churches both there and
elsewhere, and in the sixteenth-century cathedral of Segovia. In Sta.
Maria del Pi at Barcelona, in the collegiate church at Manresa, and in
the imposing nave of the <b>Cathedral</b> of <b>Gerona</b> (1416, added
to choir of 1312, the latter by a Southern French architect, Henri de
Narbonne), the influence of Alby in southern France (see <a href="#page206">p.&nbsp;206</a>) is discernible. These are one-aisled
churches with internal
<span class="pagenum">250</span>
<a name="page250" id="page250"> </a>
buttresses separating the lateral chapels. The nave of Gerona is 73 feet
wide, or double the average clear width of French or English cathedral
naves. The resulting effect is not commensurate with the actual
dimensions, and shows the inappropriateness of Gothic details for
compositions so Roman in breadth and simplicity.</p>


<p><b>SEVILLE.</b> The largest single edifice in Spain, and the largest
church built during the Middle Ages in Europe, is the <b>Cathedral of
Seville</b>, begun in 1401 on the site of a Moorish mosque. It covers
124,000 square feet, measuring 415 × 298 feet, and is a simple rectangle
comprising five aisles with lateral chapels. The central aisle is 56 ft.
wide and 145 high; the side aisles and chapels diminish gradually in
height, and with the uniform piers in six rows produce an imposing
effect, in spite of the lack of transepts or chevet. The somewhat
similar <b>New Cathedral</b> of Salamanca (1510&ndash;1560) shows the
last struggles of the Gothic style against the incoming tide of the
Renaissance.</p>


<p><b>LATER MONUMENTS.</b> These all partake of the over-decoration
which characterized the fifteenth century throughout Europe. In Spain
this decoration was even less constructive in character, and more purely
fanciful and arbitrary, than in the northern lands; but this very
rejection of all constructive pretense gives it a peculiar charm and
goes far to excuse its extravagance (Fig. 146). Decorative vaulting-ribs
were made to describe geometric patterns of great elegance. Some of the
late Gothic vaults by the very exuberance of imagination shown in their
designs, almost disarm criticism. Instead of suppressing the walls as
far as possible, and emphasizing all the vertical lines, as was done in
France and England, the later Gothic architects of Spain delighted in
broad wall-surfaces and multiplied horizontal lines. Upon these surfaces
they lavished carving without restraint and without any organic relation
to the structure of the building. The arcades of
<span class="pagenum">251</span>
<a name="page251" id="page251"> </a>
cloisters and interior courts (<i>patios</i>) were formed with arches of
fantastic curves resting on twisted columns; and internal chapels in the
cathedrals were covered with minute carving of exquisite workmanship,
but wholly irrational design. Probably the influence of Moorish
decorative art accounts in part for these extravagances. The eastern
chapels in Burgos cathedral, the votive church of <b>San Juan de los
Reyes</b> at Toledo and many portals of churches, convents and hospitals
illustrate these tendencies.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig146" id="fig146"> </a>
<img src="images/fig146.jpg" width="259" height="486"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 146.&mdash;DETAIL, PORTAL S.&nbsp;GREGORIO, VALLADOLID.</p>


<p><b>PORTUGAL</b> is an almost unknown land architecturally. It seems
to have adopted the Gothic styles very late in its history. Two
monuments, however, are conspicuous, the convent churches of Batalha
(1390&ndash;1520) and <b>Belem</b>, both marked by an extreme
overloading of carved ornament. The <b>Mausoleum of King Manoel</b> in
the rear of the church at Batalha is, however, a&nbsp;noble creation,
possibly by an English master. It is a polygonal domed edifice, some 67
feet in diameter, and well
<span class="pagenum">252</span>
<a name="page252" id="page252"> </a>
designed, though covered with a too profuse and somewhat mechanical
decoration of panels, pinnacles, and carving.</p>


<div class="monuments">
<p><b>MONUMENTS</b>: <span class="smallcaps">Germany</span> (C&nbsp;=
cathedral; A&nbsp;= abbey; tr. = transepts).&mdash;13th century:
Transitional churches: Bamberg&nbsp;C.; Naumburg&nbsp;C.; Collegiate
Church, Fritzlar; St. George, Limburg-on-Lahn; St. Castor, Coblentz;
Heisterbach&nbsp;A.;&mdash;all in early years of 13th century. St.
Gereon, Cologne, choir 1212&ndash;27; Liebfrauenkirche, Treves,
1227&ndash;44; St. Elizabeth, Marburg, 1235&ndash;83; Sts. Peter and
Paul, Neuweiler, 1250; Cologne&nbsp;C., choir 1248&ndash;1322 (nave 14th
century; towers finished 1883); Strasburg&nbsp;C., 1250&ndash;75
(E.&nbsp;end Romanesque; façade 1277&ndash;1365; tower 1429&ndash;39);
Halberstadt&nbsp;C., nave 1250 (choir 1327; completed 1490);
Altenburg&nbsp;C., choir 1255&ndash;65 (finished 1379); Wimpfen-im-Thal
church 1259&ndash;78; St. Lawrence, Nuremberg, 1260 (choir
1439&ndash;77); St. Catherine, Oppenheim, 1262&ndash;1317 (choir 1439);
Xanten, Collegiate Church, 1263; Freiburg&nbsp;C., 1270 (W.&nbsp;tower
1300; choir 1354); Toul&nbsp;C., 1272; Meissen&nbsp;C., choir 1274 (nave
1312&ndash;42); Ratisbon&nbsp;C., 1275; St. Mary’s, Lübeck, 1276;
Dominican churches at Coblentz, Gebweiler; and in Switzerland at Basle,
Berne, and Zurich.<!-- invisible . -->&mdash;14th century: Wiesenkirche,
Söst, 1313; Osnabrück&nbsp;C., 1318 (choir 1420); St. Mary’s, Prentzlau,
1325; Augsburg&nbsp;C., 1321&ndash;1431; Metz&nbsp;C., 1330 rebuilt
(choir 1486); St. Stephen’s C., Vienna, 1340 (nave 15th century; tower
1433); Zwette&nbsp;C., 1343; Prague&nbsp;C., 1344; church at Thann, 1351
(tower finished 16th century); Liebfrauenkirche, Nuremberg,
1355&ndash;61; St. Sebaldus Church, Nuremberg, 1361&ndash;77 (nave
Romanesque); Minden&nbsp;C., choir 1361; Ulm&nbsp;C., 1377 (choir 1449;
nave vaulted 1471; finished 16th century); Sta. Barbara, Kuttenberg,
1386 (nave 1483); Erfurt&nbsp;C.; St. Elizabeth, Kaschau;
Schlettstadt&nbsp;C.&mdash;15th century: St. Catherine’s, Brandenburg,
1401; Frauenkirche, Esslingen, 1406 (finished 1522); Minster at Berne,
1421; Peter-Paulskirche, Görlitz, 1423&ndash;97; St. Mary’s, Stendal,
1447; Frauenkirche, Munich, 1468&ndash;88; St. Martin’s, Landshut,
1473.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Secular Monuments.</span> Schloss
Marienburg, 1341; Moldau-bridge and tower, Prague, 1344; Karlsteinburg,
1348&ndash;57; Albrechtsburg, Meissen, 1471&ndash;83; Nassau House,
Nuremberg, 1350; Council houses (Rathhaüser) at Brunswick, 1393;
Cologne, 1407&ndash;15; Basle; Breslau; Lübeck; Münster; Prague; Ulm;
City Gates of Basle, Cologne, Ingolstadt, Lucerne.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">The Netherlands.</span><!-- invisible . -->
Brussels&nbsp;C. (Ste. Gudule), 1226&ndash;80; Tournai&nbsp;C., choir
1242 (nave finished 1380); Notre Dame, Bruges, 1239&ndash;97; Notre
Dame, Tongres, 1240; Utrecht&nbsp;C., 1251; St. Martin, Ypres, 1254;
Notre Dame,<!-- invisible , --> Dinant, 1255; church at Dordrecht;
church at Aerschot,
<span class="pagenum">253</span>
<a name="page253" id="page253"> </a>
1337; Antwerp&nbsp;C., 1352&ndash;1411 (W. front 1422&ndash;1518); St.
Rombaut, Malines, 1355&ndash;66 (nave 1456&ndash;64); St. Wandru, Mons,
1450&ndash;1528; St. Lawrence, Rotterdam, 1472; other 15th century
churches&mdash;St. Bavon, Haarlem; St. Catherine, Utrecht; St.
Walpurgis, Sutphen; St. Bavon, Ghent (tower 1461); St. Jaques, Antwerp;
St. Pierre, Louvain; St. Jacques, Bruges; churches at Arnheim, Breda,
Delft; St. Jacques, Liège, 1522.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Secular</span>: Cloth-hall, Ypres, 1200&ndash;1304;
cloth-hall, Bruges, 1284; town hall, Bruges, 1377; town hall, Brussels,
1401&ndash;55; town hall, Louvain, 1448&ndash;63; town hall, Ghent,
1481; town hall, Oudenarde, 1527; Standehuis, Delft, 1528; cloth-halls
at Louvain, Ghent, Malines.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Spain.</span>&mdash;13th century: Burgos
C., 1221 (façade 1442&ndash;56; chapels 1487; cimborio 1567);
Toledo&nbsp;C., 1227&ndash;90 (chapels 14th and 15th centuries);
Tarragona&nbsp;C., 1235; Leon&nbsp;C., 1250 (façade 14th century);
Valencia&nbsp;C., 1262 (N.&nbsp;transept 1350&ndash;1404; façade
1381&ndash;1418); Avila&nbsp;C., vault and N.&nbsp;portal
1292&ndash;1353 (finished 14th century); St. Esteban, Burgos; church at
Las Huelgas.&mdash;14th century: Barcelona&nbsp;C., choir
1298&ndash;1329 (nave and transepts 1448; façade 16th century);
Gerona&nbsp;C., 1312&ndash;46 (nave added 1416); S.&nbsp;M. del Mar,
Barcelona, 1328&ndash;83; S.&nbsp;M. del Pino, Barcelona, same date;
Collegiate Church, Manresa, 1328; Oviedo&nbsp;C., 1388 (tower very
late); Pampluna&nbsp;C., 1397 (mainly 15th century).&mdash;15th century:
Seville&nbsp;C., 1403 (finished 16th century; cimborio 1517&ndash;67);
La Seo, Saragossa (finished 1505); S.&nbsp;Pablo, Burgos, 1415&ndash;35;
El Parral, Segovia, 1459; Astorga&nbsp;C., 1471; San Juan de los Reyes,
Toledo, 1476; Carthusian church, Miraflores, 1488; San Juan, and La
Merced, Burgos.&mdash;16th century: Huesca&nbsp;C., 1515; Salamanca New
Cathedral, 1510&ndash;60; Segovia&nbsp;C., 1522; S.&nbsp;Juan de la
Puerta, Zamorra.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Secular.</span>&mdash;Porta Serraños,
Valencia, 1349; Casa Consistorial, Barcelona, 1369&ndash;78; Casa de la
Disputacion, same city; Casa de las Lonjas, Valencia, 1482.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Portugal.</span> At Batalha, church and
mausoleum of King Manoel, finished 1515; at Belem, monastery, late
Gothic.</p>
</div>




<span class="pagenum">254</span>
<a name="page254" id="page254"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXIX" id="chapXIX">CHAPTER XIX.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
GOTHIC ARCHITECTURE IN ITALY.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>; As before, Corroyer,
Reber.<!-- invisible . --> Also, Cummings, <i>A&nbsp;History of
Architecture in Italy</i>. De Fleury, <i>La Toscane au moyen âge</i>.
Gruner, <i>The Terra Cotta Architecture of Northern Italy</i>. Mothes,
<i>Die Baukunst des Mittelalters in Italien</i>. Norton, <i>Historical
Studies of Church Building in the Middle Ages</i>. Osten, <i>Bauwerke
der Lombardei</i>. Street, <i>Brick and Marble Architecture of
Italy</i>. Willis, <i>Remarks on the Architecture of the Middle Ages,
especially of Italy</i>.</p>


<p><b>GENERAL CHARACTER.</b> The various Romanesque styles which had
grown up in Italy before 1200 lacked that unity of principle out of
which alone a new and homogeneous national style could have been
evolved. Each province practised its own style and methods of building,
long after the Romanesque had given place to the Gothic in Western
Europe. The Italians were better decorators than builders, and cared
little for Gothic structural principles. Mosaic and carving, sumptuous
altars and tombs, veneerings and inlays of colored marble, broad flat
surfaces to be covered with painting and ornament&mdash;to secure these
they were content to build crudely, to tie their insufficiently
buttressed vaults with unsightly iron tie-rods, and to make their church
façades mere screen-walls, in form wholly unrelated to the buildings
behind them.</p>

<p>When, therefore, under foreign influences pointed arches, tracery,
clustered shafts, crockets and finials came into use, it was merely as
an imported fashion. Even when foreign architects (usually Germans) were
employed, the
<span class="pagenum">255</span>
<a name="page255" id="page255"> </a>
composition, and in large measure the details, were still Italian and
provincial. The church of St. Francis at Assisi (1228&ndash;53, by
<i>Jacobus of Meruan</i>, a&nbsp;German, superseded later by an Italian,
Campello), and the cathedral of Milan (begun 1389, perhaps by <i>Henry
of Gmund</i>), are conspicuous illustrations of this. Rome built
basilicas all through the Middle Ages. Tuscany continued to prefer flat
walls veneered with marble to the broken surfaces and deep buttresses of
France and Germany. Venice developed a Gothic style of façade-design
wholly her own (see <a href="#page267">p.&nbsp;267</a>). Nowhere but
in Italy could two such utterly diverse structures as the Certosa at
Pavia and the cathedral at Milan have been erected at the same time.</p>


<p><b>CLIMATE AND TRADITION.</b> Two further causes militated against
the domestication of Gothic art in Italy. The first was the brilliant
atmosphere, which made the vast traceried windows of Gothic design, and
its suppression of the wall-surfaces, wholly undesirable. Cool, dim
interiors, thick walls, small windows and the exclusion of sunlight, all
necessary to Italian comfort, were incompatible with Gothic ideals and
methods. The second obstacle was the persistence of classic traditions
of form, both in construction and decoration. The spaciousness and
breadth of interior planning which characterized Roman design, and its
amplitude of scale in every feature, seem never to have lost their hold
on the Italians. The narrow lofty aisles, multiplied supports and minute
detail of the Gothic style were repugnant to the classic predilections
of the Italian builders. The Roman acanthus and Corinthian capital were
constantly imitated in their Gothic buildings, and the round arch
continued all through the Middle Ages to be used in conjunction with the
pointed arch (Figs. <a href="#fig149">149</a>, <a href="#fig150">150</a>).</p>


<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig147" id="fig147"> </a>
<img src="images/fig147.png" width="183" height="308"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 147.&mdash;DUOMO AT FLORENCE. PLAN.<!-- invisible last three .
--><br>
<span class="caption">
<i>a, Campanile.</i></span></p>

<p><b>EARLY BUILDINGS.</b> It is hard to determine how and by whom
Gothic forms were first introduced into Italy, but it was most probably
through the agency of the monastic
<span class="pagenum">256</span>
<a name="page256" id="page256"> </a>
orders. Cistercian churches like that at Chiaravalle near Milan
(1208&ndash;21), and most of those erected by the mendicant orders of
the Franciscans (founded 1210) and Dominicans (1216), were built with
ribbed vaults and pointed arches.<!-- invisible . --> The example set by
these orders contributed greatly to the general adoption of the foreign
style. <b>S.&nbsp;Francesco</b> at <b>Assisi</b>, already mentioned, was
the first completely Gothic Franciscan church, although
<b>S.&nbsp;Francesco</b> at <b>Bologna</b>, begun a few years later, was
finished a little earlier. The Dominican church of <b>SS. Giovanni e
Paolo</b> and the great Franciscan church of <b>Sta. Maria Gloriosa dei
Frari</b>, both at Venice, were built a little later. <b>Sta. Maria
Novella</b> at Florence (1278), and <b>Sta. Maria sopra Minerva</b> at
Rome (1280), both by the brothers <i>Sisto</i> and <i>Ristoro</i>, and
<b>S.&nbsp;Anastasia</b> at Verona (1261) are the masterpieces of the
Dominican builders.<!-- invisible . --> <b>S.&nbsp;Andrea</b> at
<b>Vercelli</b> in North Italy, begun in 1219 under a foreign architect,
is an isolated early example of lay Gothic work. Though somewhat English
in its plan, and (unlike most Italian churches) provided with two
western spires in the English manner, it is in all other respects
thoroughly Italian in aspect. The church at Asti, begun in 1229,
suggests German models by its high side walls and narrow windows.<!--
invisible . --></p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig148" id="fig148"> </a>
<img src="images/fig148.jpg" width="269" height="368"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 148.&mdash;NAVE OF DUOMO AT FLORENCE.<!-- invisible all . --></p>

<p><b>CATHEDRALS.</b> The greatest monuments of Italian Gothic design
are the cathedrals, in which, even more than was the case in France, the
highly developed civic pride of the
<span class="pagenum">257</span>
<a name="page257" id="page257"> </a>
municipalities expressed itself. Chief among these half civic, half
religious monuments are the cathedrals of <b>Sienna</b> (begun in 1243),
<b>Arezzo</b> (1278), <b>Orvieto</b> (1290), <b>Florence</b> (the
<b>Duomo</b>, Sta. Maria del Fiore, begun 1294 by Arnolfo di Cambio),
<b>Lucca</b> (S.&nbsp;Martino, 1350), <b>Milan</b> (1389&ndash;1418),
and <b>S.&nbsp;Petronio</b> at Bologna (1390).<!-- invisible . --> They
are all of imposing size; Milan is the largest of all Gothic cathedrals
except Seville.<!-- invisible . --> S.&nbsp;Petronio was planned to be
600 feet long, the present structure with its three broad aisles and
flanking chapels being merely the nave of the intended edifice. The
Duomo at Florence (Fig. 147) is 500 feet long and covers 82,000 square
feet, while the octagon at the crossing is 143 feet in diameter. The
effect of these colossal dimensions is, however, as in a number of these
large Italian interiors, singularly belittled by the bareness of the
walls, by the great size of the constituent parts of the composition,
and by the lack of architectural subdivisions and multiplied detail to
serve as a scale by which to gauge the scale of the <i>ensemble</i>.</p>


<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig149" id="fig149"> </a>
<img src="images/fig149.png" width="182" height="353"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 149.&mdash;ONE BAY, NAVE OF CATHEDRAL OF SAN MARTINO, LUCCA.</p>

<p><b>INTERIOR TREATMENT.</b> It was doubtless intended to cover these
large unbroken wall-surfaces and the vast expanse of the vaults over
naves of extraordinary breadth,
<span class="pagenum">258</span>
<a name="page258" id="page258"> </a>
with paintings and color decoration. This would have remedied their
present nakedness and lack of interest, but it was only in a very few
instances carried out. The double church of S.&nbsp;Francesco at Assisi,
decorated by Cimabue, Giotto, and other early Tuscan painters, the Arena
Chapel at Padua, painted by Giotto, the <b>Spanish Chapel</b> of
S.&nbsp;M. Novella, Florence, and the east end of S.&nbsp;Croce,
Florence, are illustrations of the splendor of effect possible by this
method of decoration. The bareness of effect in other, unpainted
interiors was emphasized by the plainness of the vaults destitute of
minor ribs. The transverse ribs were usually broad arches with flat
soffits, and the vaulting was often sprung from so low a point as to
leave no room for a triforium. Mere bull’s-eyes often served for
clearstory windows, as in S.&nbsp;Anastasia at Verona, S.&nbsp;Petronio
at Bologna, and the Florentine Duomo. The cathedral of
<b>S.&nbsp;Martino</b> at Lucca (Fig. 149) is one of the most complete
and elegant of Italian Gothic interiors, having a genuine triforium with
traceried arches. Even here, however, there are round arches without
mouldings, flat pilasters, broad transverse ribs recalling Roman arches,
and insignificant bull’s-eyes in the clearstory.</p>

<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig150" id="fig150"> </a>
<img src="images/fig150.jpg" width="264" height="269"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 150.&mdash;INTERIOR OF SIENNA CATHEDRAL.</p>

<p>The failure to produce adequate results of scale in the interiors of
the larger Italian churches, has been already alluded to. It is
strikingly exemplified in the Duomo at Florence, the nave of which is 72
feet wide, with four pier-arches
<span class="pagenum">259</span>
<a name="page259" id="page259"> </a>
each over 55 feet in span. The immense vault, in square bays, starts
from the level of the tops of these arches. The interior (Fig. 148) is
singularly naked and cold, giving no conception of its vast dimensions.
The colossal dome is an early work of the Renaissance (see <a href="#page276">p.&nbsp;276</a>). It is not known how <i>Fr.
Talenti</i>, who in 1357 enlarged and vaulted the nave and planned the
east end, proposed to cover the great octagon. The east end is the most
effective part of the design both internally and externally, owing to
the relatively moderate scale of the 15 chapels which surround the
apsidal arms of the cross. In S.&nbsp;Petronio at Bologna, begun 1390 by
<i>Master Antonio</i>, the scale is better handled. The nave, 300 feet
long, is divided into six bays, each embracing two side chapels. It is
46 feet wide and 132 feet high, proportions which approximate those of
the French cathedrals, and produce an impression of size somewhat
unusual in Italian churches. <b>Orvieto</b> has internally little that
suggests Gothic architecture; like many Franciscan and Dominican
churches it is really a timber-roofed basilica with a few pointed
windows. The mixed Gothic and Romanesque interior of <b>Sienna
Cathedral</b> (Fig. 150), with its round arches and six-sided dome,
unsymmetrically placed over the crossing, is one of the most impressive
creations of Italian mediæval art. Alternate courses of black and white
marble add richness but not
<span class="pagenum">260</span>
<a name="page260" id="page260"> </a>
repose to the effect of this interior: the same is true of Orvieto, and
of some other churches. The basement baptistery of
<b>S.&nbsp;Giovanni</b>, under the east end of Sienna Cathedral, is much
more purely Gothic in detail.</p>

<p>In these, and indeed in most Italian interiors, the main interest
centres less in the excellence of the composition than in the
accessories of pavements, pulpits, choir-stalls, and sepulchral
monuments. In these the decorative fancy and skill of the Italians found
unrestrained exercise, and produced works of surpassing interest and
merit.</p>


<p><b>EXTERNAL DESIGN.</b> The greatest possible disparity generally
exists between the sides and west fronts of the Italian churches. With
few exceptions the flanks present nothing like the variety of sky-line
and of light and shade customary in northern and western lands. The side
walls are high and flat, plain, or striped with black and white masonry
(Sienna, Orvieto), or veneered with marble (Duomo at Florence) or
decorated with surface-ornament of thin pilasters and arcades (Lucca).
The clearstory is low; the roof low&mdash;pitched and hardly visible
from below. Color, rather than structural richness, is generally sought
for: Milan Cathedral is almost the only exception, and goes to the other
extreme, with its seemingly countless buttresses, pinnacles and
statues.</p>

<p>The façades, on the other hand, were treated as independent
decorative compositions, and were in many cases remarkably beautiful
works, though having little or no organic relation to the main
structure. The most celebrated are those of <b>Sienna</b> (cathedral
begun 1243; façade 1284 by <i>Giovanni Pisano</i>; Fig. 151) and
<b>Orvieto</b> (begun 1290 by <i>Lorenzo Maitani</i>; façade 1310). Both
of these are sumptuous polychromatic compositions in marble, designed on
somewhat similar lines, with three high gables fronting the three
aisles, with deeply recessed portals, pinnacled turrets flanking nave
and aisles, and a central circular window. That
<span class="pagenum">261</span>
<a name="page261" id="page261"> </a>
of Orvieto is furthermore embellished with mosaic pictures, and is the
more brilliant in color of the two. The mediæval façades of the
Florentine Gothic churches were never completed; but the elegance of the
panelling and of the tracery with twisted shafts in the flanks of the
cathedral, and the florid beauty of its side doorways (late 14th
century) would doubtless if realized with equal success on the façades,
have produced strikingly beautiful results. The modern façade of the
Duomo, by the late <i>De Fabris</i> (1887) is a correct if not highly
imaginative version of the style so applied. The front of Milan
cathedral (soon to be replaced by a new façade), shows a mixture of
Gothic and Renaissance forms. <b>Ferrara Cathedral</b>, although
internally transformed in the last century, retains its fine
13th-century three-gabled and arcaded screen front; one of the most
Gothic in spirit of all Italian façades. The <b>Cathedral</b> of
<b>Genoa</b> presents Gothic windows and deeply recessed portals in a
façade built in black and white bands, like Sienna cathedral and many
churches in Pistoia and Pisa.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig151" id="fig151"> </a>
<img src="images/fig151.jpg" width="262" height="320"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 151.&mdash;FAÇADE OF SIENNA CATHEDRAL.</p>

<p>Externally the most important feature was frequently a cupola or dome
over the crossing. That of Sienna has already been mentioned; that of
Milan is a sumptuous many-pinnacled structure terminating in a spire 300
feet high.
<span class="pagenum">262</span>
<a name="page262" id="page262"> </a>
The <b>Certosa</b> at Pavia (Fig. 152) and the earlier Carthusian church
of Chiaravalle have internal cupolas or domes covered externally by
many-storied structures ending in a tower dominating the whole edifice.
These two churches, like many others in Lombardy, the Æmilia and
Venetia, are built of brick, moulded terra-cotta being effectively used
for the cornices, string-courses, jambs and ornaments of the exterior.
The Certosa at Pavia is contemporary with the cathedral of Milan, to
which it offers a surprising contrast, both in style and material. It is
wholly built of brick and terra-cotta, and, save for its ribbed
vaulting, possesses hardly a single Gothic feature or detail. Its
arches, mouldings, and cloisters suggest both the Romanesque and the
Renaissance styles by their semi-classic character.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig152" id="fig152"> </a>
<img src="images/fig152.jpg" width="372" height="307"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 152.&mdash;EXTERIOR OF THE CERTOSA, PAVIA.</p>


<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig153" id="fig153"> </a>
<img src="images/fig153.png" width="195" height="261"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 153.&mdash;PLAN OF CERTOSA AT PAVIA.</p>

<p><b>PLANS.</b> The wide diversity of local styles in Italian
architecture appears in the plans as strikingly as in the details
<span class="pagenum">263</span>
<a name="page263" id="page263"> </a>
In general one notes a love of spaciousness which expresses itself in a
sometimes disproportionate breadth, and in the wide spacing of the
piers. The polygonal chevet with its radial chapels is but rarely seen;
<b>S.&nbsp;Lorenzo</b> at Naples, Sta. Maria dei Servi and
S.&nbsp;Francesco at Bologna are among the most important examples. More
frequently the chapels form a range along the east side of the
transepts, especially in the Franciscan churches, which otherwise retain
many basilican features. A&nbsp;comparison of the plans of
S.&nbsp;Andrea at Vercelli, the Duomo at Florence, the cathedrals of
Sienna and Milan, S.&nbsp;Petronio at Bologna and the Certosa at Pavia
(Fig. 153), sufficiently illustrates the variety of Italian Gothic
plan-types.</p>


<p><b>ORNAMENT.</b> Applied decoration plays a large part in all Italian
Gothic designs. Inlaid and mosaic patterns and panelled veneering in
colored marble are essential features of the exterior decoration of most
Italian churches. Florence offers a fine example of this treatment in
the Duomo, and in its accompanying <b>Campanile</b> or bell-tower,
designed by <i>Giotto</i> (1335), and completed by <i>Gaddi</i> and
<i>Talenti</i>. This beautiful tower is an epitome of Italian Gothic
art. Its inlays, mosaics, and veneering are treated with consummate
elegance, and combined with incrusted reliefs of great beauty. The
tracery of this monument and of the side windows of the adjoining
cathedral is lighter and more graceful than is common in Italy. Its
beauty consists, however, less in movement of line than in richness and
elegance of carved and inlaid ornament. In
<span class="pagenum">264</span>
<a name="page264" id="page264"> </a>
the <b>Or San Michele</b>&mdash;a&nbsp;combined chapel and granary in
Florence dating from 1330&mdash;the tracery is far less light and open.
In general, except in churches like the Cathedral of Milan, built under
German influences, the tracery in secular monuments is more successful
than in ecclesiastical structures. Venice developed the designing of
tracery to greater perfection in her palaces than any other Italian city
(see below).</p>


<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig154" id="fig154"> </a>
<img src="images/fig154.jpg" width="208" height="520"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 154.&mdash;UPPER PART OF CAMPANILE, FLORENCE.</p>

<p><b>MINOR WORKS.</b> Italian Gothic art found freer expression in
semi-decorative works, like tombs, altars and votive chapels, than in
more monumental structures. The fourteenth century was particularly rich
in canopy tombs, mostly in churches, though some were erected in the
open air, like the celebrated <b>Tombs of the Scaligers</b> in Verona
(1329&ndash;1380). Many of those in churches in and near Rome, and
others in south Italy, are especially rich in inlay of <i>opus
Alexandrinum</i> upon their twisted columns and panelled sarcophagi. The
family of the <i>Cosmati</i> acquired great fame for work of this kind
during the thirteenth century.</p>

<p>The little marble chapel of <b>Sta. Maria della Spina</b>, on the
Arno, at Pisa, is an instance of the successful decorative use of Gothic
forms in minor buildings.</p>


<p><b>TOWERS.</b> The Italians always preferred the square tower to the
spire, and in most cases treated it as an independent campanile.
Following Early Christian and Romanesque traditions, these square towers
were usually built with plain sides unbroken by buttresses, and
terminated in a flat roof or a low and inconspicuous cone or pyramid.
The Campanile at Florence already mentioned is by far the most beautiful
of these designs (Fig. 154). The campaniles of Sienna, Lucca, and
Pistoia are built in alternate white and black courses, like the
adjoining cathedrals. Verona and Mantua have towers with octagonal
lanterns. In general, these Gothic towers differ from the earlier
Romanesque models only in the forms of their openings. Though dignified
in
<span class="pagenum">265</span>
<a name="page265" id="page265"> </a>
their simplicity and size, and usually well proportioned, they lack the
beauty and interest of the French, English, and German steeples and
towers.</p>

<p class="illustration float null">
<a name="fig155" id="fig155"> </a>
<img class="null" src="images/fig155a.jpg"
width="159" height="242" alt="see caption and text"></p>

<p class="illustration float">
<img src="images/fig155b.jpg" width="263" height="153"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 155.<!-- invisible . -->&mdash;UPPER PART OF<br>
PALAZZO VECCHIO, FLORENCE.</p>

<p><b>SECULAR MONUMENTS.</b> In their public halls, open <i>loggias</i>,
and domestic architecture the Italians were able to develop the
application of Gothic forms with greater freedom than in their
church-building, because unfettered by traditional methods of design.
The early and vigorous growth of municipal and popular institutions led,
as in the Netherlands, to the building of two classes of public
halls&mdash;the town hall proper or <i>Podestà</i>, and the council
hall, variously called <i>Palazzo Communale</i>, <i>Pubblico</i>, or
<i>del Consiglio</i>. The town halls, as the seat of authority, usually
have a severe and fortress-like character; the <b>Palazzo Vecchio</b> at
Florence is the most important example (1298, by Arnolfo di Cambio; Fig.
155). It is especially remarkable for its tower, which, rising 308 feet
in the air, overhangs the street nearly 6&nbsp;feet, its front wall
resting on the face of the powerfully corbelled cornice of the palace.
The court and most of the interior were remodelled in the sixteenth
century. At Sienna is a somewhat
<span class="pagenum">266</span>
<a name="page266" id="page266"> </a>
similar structure in brick, the <b>Palazzo Pubblico</b>. At Pistoia the
Podestà and the Communal Palace stand opposite each other; in both of
these the courtyards still retain their original aspect. At Perugia,
Bologna, and Viterbo are others of some importance; while in Lombardy,
Bergamo, Como, Cremona, Piacenza and other towns possess smaller halls
with open arcades below, of a more elegant and pleasing aspect. More
successful still are the open loggias or tribunes erected for the
gatherings of public bodies. The <b>Loggia dei Lanzi</b> at Florence
(1376, by <i>Benci di Cione</i> and <i>Simone di Talenti</i>) is the
largest and most famous of these open vaulted halls, of which several
exist in Florence and Sienna. Gothic only in their minor details, they
are Romanesque or semi-classic in their broad round arches and strong
horizontal lines and cornices (Fig. 156).</p>

<p><b>PALACES AND HOUSES: VENICE.</b> The northern cities, especially
Pisa, Florence, Sienna, Bologna, and Venice, are rich in mediæval public
and private palaces and dwellings in brick or marble, in which pointed
windows and open arcades are used with excellent effect. In Bologna and
Sienna brick is used, in conjunction with details executed in moulded
terra-cotta, in a highly artistic and effective way. Viterbo, nearer
Rome, also possesses many interesting
<span class="pagenum">267</span>
<a name="page267" id="page267"> </a>
houses with street arcades and open stairways or stoops leading to the
main entrance.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig156" id="fig156"> </a>
<img src="images/fig156.jpg" width="403" height="276"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 156.&mdash;LOGGIA DEI LANZI, FLORENCE.</p>

<p>The security and prosperity of Venice in the Middle Ages, and the
ever present influence of the sun-loving East, made the massive and
fortress-like architecture of the inland cities unnecessary. Abundant
openings, large windows full of tracery of great lightness and elegance,
projecting balconies and the freest use of marble veneering and
inlay&mdash;a&nbsp;survival of Byzantine traditions of the 12th century
(see <a href="#page133">p.&nbsp;133</a>)&mdash;give to the Venetian
houses and palaces an air of gayety and elegance found nowhere else.
While there are few Gothic churches of importance in Venice, the number
of mediæval houses and palaces is very large. Chief among these is the
<b>Doge’s Palace</b> (Fig. 157), adjoining the church of St. Mark. The
two-storied arcades of the west and south fronts date from 1354, and
originally stood out from the main edifice, which was
<span class="pagenum">268</span>
<a name="page268" id="page268"> </a>
widened in the next century, when the present somewhat heavy walls, laid
up in red, white and black marble in a species of quarry-pattern, were
built over the arcades. These arcades are beautiful designs, combining
massive strength and grace in a manner quite foreign to Western Gothic
ideas. Lighter and more ornate is the <b>Ca d’Oro</b>, on the Grand
Canal; while the Foscari, Contarini-Fasan, Cavalli, and Pisani palaces,
among many others, are admirable examples of the style. In most of these
a traceried loggia occupies the central part, flanked by walls incrusted
with marble and pierced by Gothic windows with carved mouldings,
borders, and balconies. The Venetian Gothic owes its success largely to
the absence of structural difficulties to interfere with the purely
decorative development of Gothic details.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig157" id="fig157"> </a>
<img src="images/fig157.jpg" width="262" height="319"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 157.&mdash;WEST FRONT VIEW OF DOGE’S PALACE, VENICE.</p>


<div class="monuments">

<p><b>MONUMENTS.</b> 13th Century: Cistercian abbeys Fossanova and
Casamari, <i>cir.</i> 1208; S.&nbsp;Andrea, Vercelli, 1209;
S.&nbsp;Francesco, Assisi, 1228&ndash;53; Church at Asti, 1229;
Sienna&nbsp;C., 1243&ndash;59 (cupola 1259&ndash;64; façade 1284);
S.&nbsp;M. Gloriosa dei Frari, Venice, 1250&ndash;80 (finished 1388);
Sta. Chiara, Assisi, 1250; Sta. Trinità, Florence, 1250;
S.&nbsp;Antonio, Padua, begun 1256; SS. Giovanni e Paolo, Venice, 1260
(?)-1400; Sta. Anastasia, Verona, 1261; Naples&nbsp;C., 1272&ndash;1314
(façade 1299; portal 1407; much altered later); S.&nbsp;Lorenzo, Naples,
1275; Campo Santo, Pisa, 1278&ndash;83;
<span class="pagenum">269</span>
<a name="page269" id="page269"> </a>
Arezzo&nbsp;C., 1278; S.&nbsp;M. Novella, Florence, 1278;
S.&nbsp;Eustorgio, Milan, 1278; S.&nbsp;M. sopra Minerva, Rome, 1280;
Orvieto&nbsp;C., 1290 (façade 1310; roof 1330); Sta. Croce, Florence,
1294 (façade 1863); S.&nbsp;M. del Fiore, or C., Florence,
1294&ndash;1310 (enlarged 1357; E.&nbsp;end 1366; dome 1420&ndash;64;
façade 1887); S.&nbsp;Francesco, Bologna.&mdash;14th century:
Genoa&nbsp;C., early 14th century; S.&nbsp;Francesco, Sienna, 1310; San
Domenico, Sienna, about same date; S.&nbsp;Giovanni in Fonte, Sienna,
1317; S.&nbsp;M. della Spina, Pisa, 1323; Campanile, Florence, 1335; Or
San Michele, Florence, 1337; Milan&nbsp;C., 1386 (cupola 16th century;
façade 16th-19th century; new façade building 1895); S.&nbsp;Petronio,
Bologna, 1390; Certosa, Pavia, 1396 (choir, transepts, cupola,
cloisters, 15th and 16th centuries); Como&nbsp;C., 1396 (choir and
transepts 1513); Lucca&nbsp;C. (S.&nbsp;Martino), Romanesque building
remodelled late in 14th century; Verona&nbsp;C.; S.&nbsp;Fermo,
Maggiore; S.&nbsp;Francesco, Pisa; S.&nbsp;Lorenzo, Vicenza.&mdash;15th
century: Perugia&nbsp;C.; S.&nbsp;M. delle Grazie, Milan, 1470 (cupola
and exterior E.&nbsp;part later).</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Secular Buildings:</span> Pal. Pubblico,
Cremona, 1245; Pal. Podestà (Bargello), Florence, 1255 (enlarged
1333&ndash;45); Pal. Pubblico, Sienna, 1289&ndash;1305 (many later
alterations); Pal. Giureconsulti, Cremona, 1292; Broletto, Monza, 1293;
Loggia dei Mercanti, Bologna, 1294; Pal. Vecchio, Florence, 1298;
Broletto, Como; Pal. Ducale (Doge’s Palace), Venice, 1310&ndash;40
(great windows 1404; extended 1423&ndash;38; courtyard 15th and 16th
centuries); Loggia dei Lanzi, Florence, 1335; Loggia del Bigallo, 1337;
Broletto, Bergamo, 14th century; Loggia dei Nobili, Sienna, 1407; Pal.
Pubblico, Udine, 1457; Loggia dei Mercanti, Ancona; Pal. del Governo,
Bologna; Pal. Pepoli, Bologna; Palaces Conte Bardi, Davanzati, Capponi,
all at Florence; at Sienna, Pal. Tolomei, 1205; Pal. Saracini, Pal.
Buonsignori; at Venice, Pal. Contarini-Fasan, Cavalli, Foscari, Pisani,
and many others; others in Padua and Vicenza.</p>

</div>

</div> <!-- end div maintext -->

<div class="maintext">

<span class="pagenum">270</span>
<a name="page270" id="page270"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXX" id="chapXX">CHAPTER XX.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
EARLY RENAISSANCE ARCHITECTURE IN ITALY.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: Anderson,
<i>Architecture of the Renaissance in Italy</i>. Burckhardt, <i>The
Civilization of the Renaissance</i>; <i>Geschichte der Renaissance in
Italien</i>; <i>Der Cicerone</i>. Cellesi, <i>Sei Fabbriche di
Firenze</i>. Cicognara, <i>Le Fabbriche più cospicue di Venezia</i>.
Durm, <i>Die Baukunst der Renaissance in Italien</i> (in <i>Hdbuch. d.
Arch.</i>). Fergusson, <i>History of Modern Architecture</i>. Geymüller,
<i>La Renaissance en Toscane</i>. Montigny et Famin, <i>Architecture
Toscane</i>. Moore, <i>Character of Renaissance Architecture</i>. Müntz,
<i>La Renaissance en Italie et en France à l’époque de Charles VIII.</i>
Palustre, <i>L’Architecture de la Renaissance</i>. Pater, <i>Studies in
the Renaissance</i>. Symonds, <i>The Renaissance of the Fine Arts in
Italy</i>. Tosi and Becchio, <i>Altars, Tabernacles, and Tombs</i>.</p>


<p><b>THE CLASSIC REVIVAL.</b> The abandonment of Gothic architecture in
Italy and the substitution in its place of forms derived from classic
models were occasioned by no sudden or merely local revolution. The
Renaissance was the result of a profound and universal intellectual
movement, whose roots may be traced far back into the Middle Ages, and
which manifested itself first in Italy simply because there the
conditions were most propitious. It spread through Europe just as
rapidly as similar conditions appearing in other countries prepared the
way for it. The essence of this far-reaching movement was the protest of
the individual reason against the trammels of external and arbitrary
authority&mdash;a&nbsp;protest which found its earliest organized
expression in the Humanists. In its assertion of the intellectual and
moral rights of the individual, the Renaissance laid the foundations of
modern civilization. The same spirit, in rejecting the authority and
teachings of the
<span class="pagenum">271</span>
<a name="page271" id="page271"> </a>
Church in matters of purely secular knowledge, led to the questionings
of the precursors of modern science and the discoveries of the early
navigators. But in nothing did the reaction against mediæval
scholasticism and asceticism display itself more strikingly than in the
joyful enthusiasm which marked the pursuit of classic studies. The
long-neglected treasures of classic literature were reopened, almost
rediscovered, in the fourteenth century by the immortal
trio&mdash;Dante, Petrarch, and Boccaccio. The joy of living, the
hitherto forbidden delight in beauty and pleasure for their own sakes,
the exultant awakening to the sense of personal freedom, which came with
the bursting of mediæval fetters, found in classic art and literature
their most sympathetic expression. It was in Italy, where feudalism had
never fully established itself, and where the municipalities and guilds
had developed, as nowhere else, the sense of civic and personal freedom,
that these symptoms first manifested themselves. In Italy, and above all
in the Tuscan cities, they appeared throughout the fourteenth century in
the growing enthusiasm for all that recalled the antique culture, and in
the rapid advance of luxury and refinement in both public and private
life.</p>


<p><b>THE RENAISSANCE OF THE ARTS.</b> Classic Roman architecture had
never lost its influence on the Italian taste. Gothic art, already
declining in the West, had never been in Italy more than a borrowed
garb, clothing architectural conceptions classic rather than Gothic in
spirit. The antique monuments which abounded on every hand were ever
present models for the artist, and to the Florentines of the early
fifteenth century the civilization which had created them represented
the highest ideal of human culture. They longed to revive in their own
time the glories of ancient Rome, and appropriated with uncritical and
undiscriminating enthusiasm the good and the bad, the early and the late
forms of Roman art, Naïvely unconscious of the disparity
<span class="pagenum">272</span>
<a name="page272" id="page272"> </a>
between their own architectural conceptions and those they fancied they
imitated, they were, unknown to themselves, creating a new style, in
which the details of Roman art were fitted in novel combinations to new
requirements. In proportion as the Church lost its hold on the culture
of the age, this new architecture entered increasingly into the service
of private luxury and public display. It created, it is true, striking
types of church design, and made of the dome one of the most imposing of
external features; but its most characteristic products were palaces,
villas, council halls, and monuments to the great and the powerful. The
personal element in design asserted itself as never before in the growth
of schools and the development of styles. Thenceforward the history of
Italian architecture becomes the history of the achievements of
individual artists.</p>


<p><b>EARLY BEGINNINGS.</b> Already in the 13th century the pulpits of
Niccolo Pisano at Sienna and Pisa had revealed that master’s direct
recourse to antique monuments for inspiration and suggestion. In the
frescoes of Giotto and his followers, and in the architectural details
of many nominally Gothic buildings, classic forms had appeared with
increasing frequency during the fourteenth century. This was especially
true in Florence, which was then the artistic capital of Italy. Never,
perhaps, since the days of Pericles, had there been another community so
permeated with the love of beauty in art, and so endowed with the
capacity to realize it. Nowhere else in Europe at that time was there
such strenuous life, such intense feeling, or such free course for
individual genius as in Florence. Her artists, with unexampled
versatility, addressed themselves with equal success to goldsmiths’
work, sculpture, architecture and engineering&mdash;often to painting
and poetry as well; and they were quick to catch in their art the spirit
of the classic revival. The new movement achieved its first
architectural
<span class="pagenum">273</span>
<a name="page273" id="page273"> </a>
triumph in the dome of the cathedral of Florence (1420&ndash;64); and it
was Florentine&mdash;or at least Tuscan&mdash;artists who planted in
other centres the seeds of the new art that were to spring up in the
local and provincial schools of Sienna, Milan, Pavia, Bologna, and
Venice, of Brescia, Lucca, Perugia, and Rimini, and many other North
Italian cities. The movement asserted itself late in Rome and Naples, as
an importation from Northern Italy, but it bore abundant fruit in these
cities in its later stages.</p>


<p><b>PERIODS.</b> The classic styles which grew up out of the
Renaissance may be divided for convenience into four periods.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">The Early Renaissance</span> or <span class="smallcaps">Formative Period</span>, 1420&ndash;90; characterized by
the grace and freedom of the decorative detail, suggested by Roman
prototypes and applied to compositions of great variety and
originality.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">The High Renaissance</span> or <span class="smallcaps">Formally Classic Period</span>, 1490&ndash;1550. During
this period classic details were copied with increasing fidelity, the
orders especially appearing in almost all compositions; decoration
meanwhile losing somewhat in grace and freedom.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">The Early Baroque</span> (or <span class="smallcaps">Baroco</span>), 1550&ndash;1600; a&nbsp;period of classic
formality characterized by the use of colossal orders, engaged columns
and rather scanty decoration.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">The Decline</span> or <span class="smallcaps">Later Baroque</span>, marked by poverty of invention in the
composition and a predominance of vulgar sham and display in the
decoration. Broken pediments, huge scrolls, florid stucco-work and a
general disregard of architectural propriety were universal.</p>

<p>During the eighteenth century there was a reaction from these
extravagances, which showed itself in a return to the servile copying of
classic models, sometimes not without a certain dignity of composition
and restraint in the decoration.</p>

<p>By many writers the name Renaissance is confined to the
<span class="pagenum">274</span>
<a name="page274" id="page274"> </a>
first period. This is correct from the etymological point of view; but
it is impossible to dissociate the first period historically from those
which followed it, down to the final exhaustion of the artistic movement
to which it gave birth, in the heavy extravagances of the Rococo.</p>

<p>Another division is made by the Italians, who give the name of the
<i>Quattrocento</i> to the period which closed with the end of the
fifteenth century, <i>Cinquecento</i> to the sixteenth <ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘cenury’">century</ins>, and
<i>Seicento</i> to the seventeenth century or Rococo. It has, however,
become common to confine the use of the term Cinquecento to the first
half of the sixteenth century.</p>


<p class="illustration float w270">
<a name="fig158" id="fig158"> </a>
<img src="images/fig158.jpg" width="264" height="284"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 158.&mdash;EARLY RENAISSANCE CAPITAL, PAL. ZORZI, VENICE.</p>

<p><b>CONSTRUCTION AND DETAIL.</b> The architects of the Renaissance
occupied themselves more with form than with construction, and rarely
set themselves constructive problems of great difficulty. Although the
new architecture began with the colossal dome of the cathedral of
Florence, and culminated in the stupendous church of St. Peter at Rome,
it was pre-eminently an architecture of palaces and villas, of façades
and of decorative display. Constructive difficulties were reduced to
their lowest terms, and the constructive framework was concealed, not
emphasized, by the decorative apparel of the design. Among the
masterpieces of the early Renaissance are many buildings of small
dimensions, such as gates, chapels, tombs and fountains. In these the
individual fancy had full sway, and produced surprising results by the
beauty of enriched mouldings, of carved friezes with infant genii,
wreaths of fruit, griffins, masks and scrolls; by pilasters covered with
arabesques as delicate in modelling as if wrought in silver; by inlays
of marble, panels of glazed terra-cotta, marvellously carved doors, fine
stucco-work in relief, capitals and cornices of wonderful richness and
variety. The Roman orders appeared only in free imitations, with
panelled and carved pilasters for the most part instead of columns, and
capitals
<span class="pagenum">275</span>
<a name="page275" id="page275"> </a>
of fanciful design, recalling remotely the Corinthian by their volutes
and leaves (Fig. 158). Instead of the low-pitched classic pediments,
there appears frequently an arched cornice enclosing a sculptured
lunette. Doors and windows were enclosed in richly carved frames,
sometimes arched and sometimes square. Façades were flat and unbroken,
depending mainly for effect upon the distribution and adornment of the
openings, and the design of doorways, courtyards and cornices.
Internally vaults and flat ceilings of wood and plaster were about
equally common, the barrel vault and dome occurring far more frequently
than the groined vault. Many of the ceilings of this period are of
remarkable richness and beauty.</p>


<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig159" id="fig159"> </a>
<img src="images/fig159.png" width="175" height="268"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 159.<!-- invisible . -->&mdash;SECTION OF DOME OF DUOMO,
FLORENCE.</p>

<p><b>THE EARLY RENAISSANCE IN FLORENCE: THE DUOMO.</b> In the year 1417
a public competition was held for completing the cathedral of Florence
by a dome over the immense octagon, 143 feet in diameter. <i>Filippo
Brunelleschi</i>, sculptor and architect (1377&ndash;1446), who with
Donatello had journeyed to Rome to study there the masterworks of
ancient art, after demonstrating the inadequacy of all the solutions
proposed by the competitors, was finally permitted to undertake the
gigantic task according to his own plans. These provided for an
octagonal dome in two shells, connected
<span class="pagenum">276</span>
<a name="page276"> </a>
by eight major and sixteen minor ribs, and crowned by a lantern at the
top (Fig. 159). This wholly original conception, by which for the first
time (outside of Moslem art) the dome was made an external feature fitly
terminating in the light forms and upward movement of a lantern, was
carried out between the years 1420 and 1464. Though in no wise an
imitation of Roman forms, it was classic in its spirit, in its vastness
and its simplicity of line, and was made possible solely by
Brunelleschi’s studies of Roman design and construction (Fig. 160).</p>


<p><b>OTHER CHURCHES.</b> From Brunelleschi’s designs were also erected
the <b>Pazzi Chapel</b> in Sta. Croce, a&nbsp;charming design of a Greek
cross covered with a dome at the intersection, and preceded by a
vestibule with a richly decorated vault; and the two great churches of
<b>S.&nbsp;Lorenzo</b> (1425) and <b>S.&nbsp;Spirito</b>
(1433&ndash;1476, Fig. 161). Both reproduced in a measure the plan of
the Pisa Cathedral, having a three-aisled nave and transepts, with a low
dome over the crossing. The side aisles were covered with domical vaults
and the central aisles with flat wooden or plaster ceilings. All the
details of columns, arches and mouldings were imitated from Roman
models, and yet the result was something entirely new. Consciously or
unconsciously, Brunelleschi was reviving Byzantine rather than Roman
conceptions in the planning and structural design of these domical
churches, but the garb in which he clothed them was Roman, at least in
detail. The <b>Old Sacristy</b> of S.&nbsp;Lorenzo was another domical
design of great beauty.</p>

<span class="pagenum">277</span>
<a name="page277" id="page277"> </a>

<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig160" id="fig160"> </a>
<img src="images/fig160.jpg" width="241" height="338"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 160.<!-- invisible both . -->&mdash;EXTERIOR OF DOME OF DUOMO,
FLORENCE.</p>

<p>From this time on the new style was in general use for church
designs. <i>L.&nbsp;B. Alberti</i> (1404&ndash;73), who had in Rome
mastered classic details more thoroughly than Brunelleschi, remodelled
the church of <b>S.&nbsp;Francesco</b> at <b>Rimini</b> with Roman
pilasters and arches, and with engaged orders in the façade, which,
however, was never completed. His great work was the church of
<b>S.&nbsp;Andrea</b> at <b>Mantua</b>, a&nbsp;Latin cross in plan, with
a dome at the intersection (the present high dome dating however, only
from the 18th century) and a façade to which the conception of a Roman
triumphal arch was skilfully adapted. His façade of incrusted marbles
for the church of S.&nbsp;M. Novella at Florence was a less successful
work, though its flaring consoles over the side aisles established an
unfortunate precedent frequently imitated in later churches.</p>

<p>A great activity in church-building marked the period between 1475
and 1490. The plans of the churches erected about this time throughout
north Italy display an interesting variety of arrangements, in nearly
all of which the dome is combined with the three-aisled cruciform plan,
either as a central feature at the crossing or as a domical vault over
each bay. Bologna and Ferrara possess a number of churches of this kind.
Occasionally the basilican arrangement was followed, with columnar
arcades separating
<span class="pagenum">278</span>
<a name="page278" id="page278"> </a>
the aisles. More often, however, the pier-arches were of the Roman type,
with engaged columns or pilasters between them. The interiors,
presumably intended to receive painted decorations, were in most cases
somewhat bare of ornament, pleasing rather by happy proportions and
effective vaulting or rich flat ceilings, panelled, painted and gilded,
than by elaborate architectural detail. A&nbsp;similar scantiness of
ornament is to be remarked in the exteriors, excepting the façades,
which were sometimes highly ornate; the doorways, with columns,
pediments, sculpture and carving, receiving especial attention. High
external domes did not come into general use until the next period. In
Milan, Pavia, and some other Lombard cities, the internal cupola over
the crossing was, however, covered externally by a lofty structure in
diminishing stages, like that of the Certosa at Pavia (Fig. 152), or
that erected by Bramante for the church of S.&nbsp;M. delle Grazie at
Milan. At Prato, in the church of the <b>Madonna delle Carceri</b>
(1495&ndash;1516), by <i>Giuliano da S.&nbsp;Gallo</i>, the type of the
Pazzi chapel reappears in a larger scale; the plan is cruciform, with
equal or nearly equal arms covered by barrel vaults, at whose
intersection rises a dome of
<span class="pagenum">279</span>
<a name="page279" id="page279"> </a>
moderate height on pendentives. This charming edifice, with its
unfinished exterior of white marble, its simple and dignified lines, and
internal embellishments in della-Robbia ware, is one of the masterpieces
of the period.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig161" id="fig161"> </a>
<img src="images/fig161.jpg" width="260" height="350"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 161.&mdash;INTERIOR OF S.&nbsp;SPIRITO, FLORENCE.</p>

<p>In the designing of chapels and oratories the architects of the early
Renaissance attained conspicuous success, these edifices presenting
fewer structural limitations and being more purely decorative in
character than the larger churches. Such façades as that of
<b>S.&nbsp;Bernardino</b> at Perugia and of the <b>Frati di
S.&nbsp;Spirito</b> at Bologna are among the most delightful products of
the decorative fancy of the 15th century.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig162" id="fig162"> </a>
<img src="images/fig162.jpg" width="265" height="315"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 162.&mdash;COURTYARD OF RICCARDI PALACE, FLORENCE.<!-- invisible
all . --></p>

<p><b>FLORENTINE PALACES.</b> While the architects of this period failed
to develop any new and thoroughly satisfactory ecclesiastical type, they
attained conspicuous success in palace-architecture. The <b>Riccardi</b>
palace in Florence (1430) marks the first step of the Renaissance in
this direction. It was built for the great Cosimo di Medici by
<i>Michelozzi</i> (1397&ndash;1473), a&nbsp;contemporary of Brunelleschi
and Alberti, and a man of great talent. Its imposing rectangular façade,
with widely spaced mullioned windows in two stories over a massive
basement, is crowned with a classic cornice of unusual and perhaps
excessive size. In
<span class="pagenum">280</span>
<a name="page280" id="page280"> </a>
spite of the bold and fortress-like character of the rusticated masonry
of these façades, and the mediæval look they seem to present to modern
eyes, they marked a revolution in style and established a type
frequently imitated in later years. The courtyard, in contrast with this
stern exterior, appears light and cheerful (Fig. 162). Its wall is
carried on round arches borne by columns with Corinthianesque capitals,
and the arcade is enriched with sculptured medallions. <b>The Pitti
Palace</b>, by Brunelleschi (1435), embodies the same ideas on a more
colossal scale, but lacks the grace of an adequate cornice.
A&nbsp;lighter and more ornate style appeared in 1460 in the
<b>P.&nbsp;Rucellai</b>, by Alberti, in which for the first time
classical pilasters in superposed stages were applied to a street
façade. To avoid the dilemma of either insufficiently crowning the
edifice or making the cornice too heavy for the upper range of
pilasters, Alberti made use of brackets, occupying the width of the
upper frieze, and converting the whole upper entablature into a cornice.
But this compromise was not quite successful, and it remained for later
architects in Venice, Verona, and Rome to work out more satisfactory
methods of applying the orders to many-storied palace façades. In the
great <b>P.&nbsp;Strozzi</b> (Fig. 163), erected in 1490 by <i>Benedetto
da Majano</i> and <i>Cronaca</i>, the architects reverted to the earlier
type of the P.&nbsp;Riccardi, treating it with greater refinement and
producing one of the noblest palaces of Italy.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig163" id="fig163"> </a>
<img src="images/fig163.jpg" width="261" height="205"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 163.&mdash;FAÇADE OF STROZZI PALACE, FLORENCE.</p>


<span class="pagenum">281</span>
<a name="page281" id="page281"> </a>
<p><b>COURTYARDS; ARCADES.</b> These palaces were all built around
interior courts, whose walls rested on columnar arcades, as in the
P.&nbsp;Riccardi (Fig. 162). The origin of these arcades may be found in
the arcaded cloisters of mediæval monastic churches, which often suggest
classic models, as in those of St. Paul-beyond-the-Walls and St. John
Lateran at Rome. Brunelleschi not only introduced columnar arcades into
a number of cloisters and palace courts, but also used them effectively
as exterior features in the <b>Loggia S.&nbsp;Paolo</b> and the
Foundling Hospital (<b>Ospedale degli Innocenti</b>) at Florence. The
chief drawback in these light arcades was their inability to withstand
the thrust of the vaulting over the space behind them, and the
consequent recourse to iron tie-rods where vaulting was used. The
Italians, however, seemed to care little about this disfigurement.</p>


<p><b>MINOR WORKS.</b> The details of the new style were developed quite
as rapidly in purely decorative works as in monumental buildings.
Altars, mural monuments, tabernacles, pulpits and <i>ciboria</i>
afforded scope for the genius of the most distinguished artists. Among
those who were specially celebrated in works of this kind should be
named <i>Lucca della Robbia</i> (1400&ndash;82) and his successors,
<i>Mino da Fiesole</i> (1431&ndash;84) and <i>Benedetto da Majano</i>
(1442&ndash;97). Possessed of a wonderful fertility of invention, they
and their pupils multiplied their works in extraordinary number and
variety, not only throughout north Italy, but also in Rome and Naples.
Among the most famous examples of this branch of design may be mentioned
a pulpit in Sta. Croce by B.&nbsp;da Majano; a&nbsp;terra-cotta fountain
in the sacristy of S.&nbsp;M. Novella, by the della Robbias; the
Marsupini tomb in Sta. Croce, by <i>Desiderio da Settignano</i> (all in
Florence); the della Rovere tomb in S.&nbsp;M. del Popolo, Rome, by Mino
da Fiesole, and in the Cathedral at Lucca the Noceto tomb and the
Tempietto, by <i>Matteo Civitali</i>. It was in
<span class="pagenum">282</span>
<a name="page282" id="page282"> </a>
works of this character that the Renaissance oftenest made its first
appearance in a new centre, as was the case in Sienna, Pisa, Lucca,
Naples, etc.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig164" id="fig164"> </a>
<img src="images/fig164.jpg" width="261" height="517"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 164.&mdash;TOMB OF PIETRO DI NOCETO, LUCCA.</p>


<p><b>NORTH ITALY.</b> Between 1450 and 1490 the Renaissance presented
in Sienna, in a number of important palaces, a&nbsp;sharp contrast to
the prevalent Gothic style of that city. The
<b>P.&nbsp;Piccolomini</b>&mdash;a&nbsp;somewhat crude imitation of the
P.&nbsp;Riccardi in Florence&mdash;dates from 1463; the <b>P.&nbsp;del
Governo</b> was built 1469, and the <b>Spannocchi Palace</b> in 1470. In
1463 <i>Ant. Federighi</i> built there the <b>Loggia del Papa</b>. About
the same time <i>Bernardo di Lorenzo</i> was building for Pope Pius II.
(Æneas Sylvius Piccolomini) an entirely new city, <b>Pienza</b>, with a
cathedral, archbishop’s palace, town hall and Papal residence (the
<b>P.&nbsp;Piccolomini</b>), which are interesting if not strikingly
original works. Pisa possesses few early Renaissance structures, owing
to the utter prostration of her fortunes
<span class="pagenum">283</span>
<a name="page283" id="page283"> </a>
in the 15th century, and the dominance of Pisan Gothic traditions. In
Lucca, besides a wealth of minor monuments (largely the work of Matteo
Civitali, 1435&ndash;1501) in various churches, a&nbsp;number of palaces
date from this period, the most important being the
<b>P.&nbsp;Pretorio</b> and P.&nbsp;Bernardini. To Milan the Renaissance
was carried by the Florentine masters <i>Michelozzi</i> and
<i>Filarete</i>, to whom are respectively due the <b>Portinari
Chapel</b> in S.&nbsp;Eustorgio (1462) and the earlier part of the great
<b>Ospedale Maggiore</b> (1457). In the latter, an edifice of brick with
terra-cotta enrichments, the windows were Gothic in outline&mdash;an
unusual mixture of styles, even in Italy. The munificence of the
Sforzas, the hereditary tyrants of the province, embellished the
semi-Gothic <b>Certosa</b> of Pavia with a new marble façade, begun 1476
or 1491, which in its fanciful and exuberant decoration, and the small
scale of its parts, belongs properly to the early Renaissance.
Exquisitely beautiful in detail, it resembles rather a magnified
altar-piece than a work of architecture, properly speaking. Bologna and
Ferrara developed somewhat late in the century a strong local school of
architecture, remarkable especially for the beauty of its courtyards,
its graceful street arcades, and its artistic treatment of brick and
terra-cotta (<b>P.&nbsp;Bevilacqua</b>, <b>P.&nbsp;Fava</b>, at Bologna;
<b>P.&nbsp;Scrofa</b>, <b>P.&nbsp;Roverella</b>, at Ferrara). About the
same time palaces with interior arcades and details in the new style
were erected in Verona, Vicenza, Mantua, and other cities.</p>


<p><b>VENICE.</b> In this city of merchant princes and a wealthy
<i>bourgeoisie</i>, the architecture of the Renaissance took on a new
aspect of splendor and display. It was late in appearing, the Gothic
style with its tinge of Byzantine decorative traditions having here
developed into a style well suited to the needs of a rich and relatively
tranquil community. These traditions the architects of the new style
appropriated in a measure, as in the marble incrustations of the
exquisite little church of <b>S.&nbsp;M. dei Miracoli</b>
(1480&ndash;89), and the façade
<span class="pagenum">284</span>
<a name="page284" id="page284"> </a>
of the <b>Scuola di S.&nbsp;Marco</b> (1485&ndash;1533), both by
<i>Pietro Lombardo</i>. Nowhere else, unless on the contemporary façade
of the Certosa at Pavia, were marble inlays and delicate carving,
combined with a framework of thin pilasters, finely profiled
entablatures and arched pediments, so lavishly bestowed upon the street
fronts of churches and palaces. The family of the <i>Lombardi</i>
(Martino, his sons Moro and Pietro, and grandsons Antonio and Tullio),
with <i>Ant. Bregno</i> and <i>Bart. Buon</i>, were the leaders in the
architectural Renaissance of this period, and to them Venice owes her
choicest masterpieces in the new style. Its first appearance is noted in
the later portions of the church of <b>S.&nbsp;Zaccaria</b>
(1456&ndash;1515), partly Gothic internally, with a façade whose
semicircular pediment and small decorative arcades show a somewhat timid
but interesting application of classic details. In this church, and
still more so in S.&nbsp;Giobbe (1451&ndash;93) and the Miracoli above
mentioned, the decorative element predominates throughout. It is hard to
imagine details more graceful in design, more effective in the swing of
their movement, or more delicate in execution than the mouldings,
reliefs, wreaths, scrolls, and capitals one encounters in these
buildings. Yet in structural interest, in scale and breadth of planning,
these early Renaissance Venetian buildings hold a relatively inferior
rank.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig165" id="fig165"> </a>
<img src="images/fig165.jpg" width="412" height="312"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 165.&mdash;VENDRAMINI PALACE, VENICE.</p>


<p><b>PALACES.</b> The great <b>Court</b> of the <b>Doge’s Palace</b>,
begun 1483 by <i>Ant. Rizzio</i>, belongs only in part to the first
period. It shows, however, the lack of constructive principle and of
largeness of composition just mentioned, but its decorative effect and
picturesque variety elicit almost universal admiration. Like the
neighboring façade of St. Mark’s, it violates nearly every principle of
correct composition, and yet in a measure atones for this capital defect
by its charm of detail. Far more satisfactory from the purely
architectural point of view is the façade of the
<b>P.&nbsp;Vendramini</b> (Vendramin-Calergi), by Pietro Lombardo
(1481). The simple,
<span class="pagenum">285</span>
<a name="page285" id="page285"> </a>
stately lines of its composition, the dignity of its broad arched and
mullioned windows, separated by engaged columns&mdash;the earliest
example in Venice of this feature, and one of the earliest in
Italy&mdash;its well-proportioned basement and upper stories, crowned by
an adequate but somewhat heavy entablature, make this one of the finest
palaces in Italy (Fig. 165) It established a type of large-windowed,
vigorously modelled façades which later architects developed, but hardly
surpassed. In the smaller contemporary, P.&nbsp;Dario, another type
appears, better suited for small buildings, depending for effect mainly
upon well-ordered openings and incrusted panelling of colored
marble.</p>


<p><b>ROME.</b> Internal disorders and the long exile of the popes had
by the end of the fourteenth century reduced Rome to utter
insignificance. Not until the second half of the fifteenth century did
returning prosperity and wealth afford
<span class="pagenum">286</span>
<a name="page286" id="page286"> </a>
the Renaissance its opportunity in the Eternal City. Pope
Nicholas&nbsp;V. had, indeed, begun the rebuilding of St. Peter’s from
designs by B.&nbsp;Rossellini, in 1450, but the project lapsed shortly
after with the death of the pope. The earliest Renaissance building in
Rome was the <b>P.&nbsp;di Venezia</b>, begun in 1455, together with the
adjoining porch of S.&nbsp;Marco. In this palace and the adjoining
unfinished Palazzetto we find the influence of the old Roman monuments
clearly manifested in the court arcades, built like those of the
Colosseum, with superposed stages of massive piers and engaged columns
carrying entablatures. The proportions are awkward, the details coarse;
but the spirit of Roman classicism is here seen in the germ. The
exterior of this palace is, however, still Gothic in spirit. The
architects are unknown; <i>Giuliano da Majano</i> (1452&ndash;90),
<i>Giacomo di Pietrasanta</i>, and <i>Meo del Caprino</i>
(1430&ndash;1501) are known to have worked upon it, but it is not
certain in what capacity.</p>

<p>The new style, reaching, and in time overcoming, the conservatism of
the Church, overthrew the old basilican traditions. In
<b>S.&nbsp;Agostino</b> (1479&ndash;83), by <i>Pietrasanta</i>, and
<b>S.&nbsp;M. del Popolo</b>, by Pintelli (?), piers with pilasters or
half-columns and massive arches separate the aisles, and the crossing is
crowned with a dome. To the same period belong the Sistine chapel and
parts of the Vatican palace, but the interest of these lies rather in
their later decorations than in their somewhat scanty architectural
merit.</p>

<p>The architectural renewal of Rome, thus begun, reached its
culmination in the following period.</p>


<p><b>OTHER MONUMENTS.</b> The complete enumeration of even the most
important Early Renaissance monuments of Italy is impossible within our
limits. Two or three only can here be singled out as suggesting types.
Among town halls of this period the first place belongs to the
<b>P.&nbsp;del Consiglio</b> at Verona, by <i>Fra Giocondo</i>
(1435&ndash;1515). In this beautiful edifice the façade consists of a
light and graceful
<span class="pagenum">287</span>
<a name="page287" id="page287"> </a>
arcade supporting a wall pierced with four windows, and covered with
elaborate frescoed arabesques (recently restored). Its unfortunate
division by pilasters into four bays, with a pier in the centre, is a
blemish avoided in the contemporary <b>P.&nbsp;del Consiglio</b> at
Padua. The <b>Ducal Palace</b> at Urbino, by <i>Luciano da Laurano</i>
(1468), is noteworthy for its fine arcaded court, and was highly famed
in its day. At Brescia <b>S.&nbsp;M. dei Miracoli</b> is a remarkable
example of a cruciform domical church dating from the close of this
period, and is especially celebrated for the exuberant decoration of its
porch and its elaborate detail. Few campaniles were built in this
period; the best of them are at Venice. Naples possesses several
interesting Early Renaissance monuments, chief among which are the
<b>Porta Capuana</b> (1484), by <i>Giul. da Majano</i>, the triumphal
<b>Arch of Alphonso</b> of Arragon, by <i>Pietro di Martino</i>, and the
<b>P.&nbsp;Gravina</b>, by <i>Gab. d’Agnolo</i>. Naples is also very
rich in minor works of the early Renaissance, in which it ranks with
Florence, Venice, and Rome.</p>




<span class="pagenum">288</span>
<a name="page288" id="page288"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXXI" id="chapXXI">CHAPTER XXI.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
RENAISSANCE ARCHITECTURE IN ITALY&mdash;<i>Continued</i>.</h3>

<h3 class="subsub">
THE ADVANCED RENAISSANCE AND DECLINE.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before,
Burckhardt, Cicognara, Fergusson, Palustre. Also, Gauthier, <i>Les plus
beaux edifices de Gênes</i>. Geymüller, <i>Les projets primitifs pour la
basilique de St. Pierre de Rome</i>. Gurlitt, <i>Geschichte des
Barockstiles in Italien</i>. Letarouilly, <i>Édifices de Rome
Moderne</i>; <i>Le Vatican</i>. Palladio, <i>The Works of
A.&nbsp;Palladio</i>.</p>


<p><b>CHARACTER OF THE ADVANCED RENAISSANCE.</b> It was inevitable that
the study and imitation of Roman architecture should lead to an
increasingly literal rendering of classic details and a closer copying
of antique compositions. Toward the close of the fifteenth century the
symptoms began to multiply of the approaching reign of formal
classicism. Correctness in the reproduction of old Roman forms came in
time to be esteemed as one of the chief of architectural virtues, and in
the following period the orders became the principal resource of the
architect. During the so-called Cinquecento, that is, from the close of
the fifteenth century to nearly or quite 1550, architecture still
retained much of the freedom and refinement of the Quattrocento. There
was meanwhile a notable advance in dignity and amplitude of design,
especially in the internal distribution of buildings. Externally the
orders were freely used as subordinate features in the decoration of
doors and windows, and in court arcades of the Roman type. The
lantern-crowned
<span class="pagenum">289</span>
<a name="page289" id="page289"> </a>
dome upon a high drum was developed into one of the noblest of
architectural forms. Great attention was bestowed upon all subordinate
features; doors and windows were treated with frames and pediments of
extreme elegance and refinement; all the cornices and mouldings were
proportioned and profiled with the utmost care, and the balustrade was
elaborated into a feature at once useful and highly ornate. Interior
decoration was even more splendid than before, if somewhat less delicate
and subtle; relief enrichments in stucco were used with admirable
effect, and the greatest artists exercised their talents in the painting
of vaults and ceilings, as in P.&nbsp;del Té at Mantua, by <i>Giulio
Romano</i> (1492&ndash;1546), and the Sistine Chapel at Rome, by Michael
Angelo. This period is distinguished by an exceptional number of great
architects and buildings. It was ushered in by <i>Bramante Lazzari</i>,
of Urbino (1444&ndash;1514), and closed during the career of <i>Michael
Angelo Buonarotti</i> (1475&ndash;1564); two names worthy to rank with
that of Brunelleschi. Inferior only to these in architectural genius
were <i>Raphael</i> (1483&ndash;1520), <i>Baldassare Peruzzi</i>
(1481&ndash;1536), <i>Antonio da San Gallo the Younger</i>
(1485&ndash;1546), and <i>G.&nbsp;Barozzi da Vignola</i>
(1507&ndash;1572), in Rome; <i>Giacopo Tatti Sansovino</i>
(1479&ndash;1570), in Venice, and others almost equally illustrious.
This period witnessed the erection of an extraordinary series of
palaces, villas, and churches, the beginning and much of the
construction of St. Peter’s at Rome, and a complete transformation in
the aspect of that city.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig166" id="fig166"> </a>
<img src="images/fig166.png" width="275" height="239"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 166.&mdash;FAÇADE OF THE GIRAUD PALACE, ROME.</p>

<p><b>BRAMANTE’S WORKS.</b> While precise time limits cannot be set to
architectural styles, it is not irrational to date this period from the
maturing of Bramante’s genius. While his earlier works in Milan belong
to the Quattrocento (S.&nbsp;M. delle Grazie, the sacristy of San
Satiro, the extension of the Great Hospital), his later designs show the
classic tendency very clearly. The charming <b>Tempietto</b> in the
court of
<span class="pagenum">290</span>
<a name="page290" id="page290"> </a>
S.&nbsp;Pietro in Montorio at Rome, a&nbsp;circular temple-like chapel
(1502), is composed of purely classic elements. In the
<b>P.&nbsp;Giraud</b> (Fig. 166) and the great <b>Cancelleria</b>
Palace, pilasters appear in the external composition, and all the
details of doors and windows betray the results of classic study, as
well as the refined taste of their designer.<a class="tag" name="tag24" id="tag24" href="#note24">24</a> The beautiful courtyard of
the Cancelleria combines the Florentine system of arches on columns with
the Roman system of superposed arcades independent of the court wall. In
1506 Bramante began the rebuilding of St. Peter’s for Julius II. (see <a
href="#page294">p.&nbsp;294</a>) and the construction of a new and
imposing papal palace adjoining it on the Vatican hill. Of this colossal
group of edifices, commonly known as the <b>Vatican</b>, he executed the
greater Belvedere court (afterward divided in two by the Library and the
Braccio Nuovo), the lesser octagonal court of the Belvedere, and the
court of San Damaso, with its arcades afterward frescoed by Raphael and
his school. Besides these, the cloister of S.&nbsp;M. della Pace, and
many other works in and out of Rome, reveal the impress of Bramante’s
genius, alike in their admirable plans and in the harmony and beauty of
their details.</p>


<p><b>FLORENTINE PALACES.</b> The P. Riccardi long remained the accepted
type of palace in Florence. As we have seen, it was imitated in the
Strozzi palace, as late as 1489, with
<span class="pagenum">291</span>
<a name="page291" id="page291"> </a>
greater perfection of detail, but with no radical change of conception.
In the <b>P.&nbsp;Gondi</b>, however, begun in the following year by
<i>Giuliano da San Gallo</i> (1445&ndash;1516), a&nbsp;more pronounced
classic spirit appears, especially in the court and the interior design.
Early in the 16th century classic columns and pediments began to be used
as decorations for doors and windows; the rustication was confined to
basements and corner-quoins, and niches, loggias, and porches gave
variety of light and shade to the façades (<b>P.&nbsp;Bartolini</b>, by
<i>Baccio d’Agnolo</i>; <b>P.&nbsp;Larderel</b>, 1515, by <i>Dosio</i>;
<b>P.&nbsp;Guadagni</b>, by <i>Cronaca</i>; <b>P.&nbsp;Pandolfini</b>,
1518, attributed to Raphael). In the <b>P.&nbsp;Serristori</b>, by
Baccio d’Agnolo (1510), pilasters were applied to the composition of the
façade, but this example was not often followed in Florence.</p>


<p><b>ROMAN PALACES.</b> These followed a different type. They were
usually of great size, and built around ample courts with arcades of
classic model in two or three stories. The broad street façade in three
stories with an attic or mezzanine was crowned with a rich cornice. The
orders were sparingly used externally, and effect was sought principally
in the careful proportioning of the stories, in the form and
distribution of the square-headed and arched openings, and in the design
of mouldings, string-courses, cornices, and other details. The <i>piano
nobile</i>, or first story above the basement, was given up to suites of
sumptuous reception-rooms and halls, with magnificent ceilings and
frescoes by the great painters of the day, while antique statues and
reliefs adorned the courts, vestibules, and niches of these princely
dwellings. The <b>Massimi</b> palace, by Peruzzi, is an interesting
example of this type. The Vatican, Cancelleria, and Giraud palaces have
already been mentioned; other notable palaces are the Palma (1506) and
Sacchetti (1540), by A.&nbsp;da San Gallo the Younger; the
<b>Farnesina</b>, by Peruzzi, with celebrated fresco decorations
designed by Raphael;
<span class="pagenum">292</span>
<a name="page292" id="page292"> </a>
and the Lante (1520) and Altemps (1530), by Peruzzi. But the noblest
creation of this period was the</p>

<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig167" id="fig167"> </a>
<img src="images/fig167.png" width="210" height="276"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 167.<!-- invisible both . -->&mdash;PLAN OF FARNESE PALACE.<br>
<a class="closeup" href="images/fig167_large.png" target="_blank">
Larger View</a></p>

<p><b>FARNESE PALACE</b>, by many esteemed the finest in Italy. It was
begun in 1530 for Alex. Farnese (Paul III.) by A.&nbsp;da San Gallo the
Younger, with Vignola’s collaboration. The simple but admirable plan is
shown in Fig. 167, and the courtyard, the most imposing in Italy, in
Fig. 168. The exterior is monotonous, but the noble cornice by Michael
Angelo measurably redeems this defect. The fine vaulted columnar
entrance vestibule, the court and the <i>salons</i>, make up an
<i>ensemble</i> worthy of the great architects who designed it. The
loggia toward the river was added by <i>G.&nbsp;della Porta</i> in
1580.</p>


<p><b>VILLAS.</b> The Italian villa of this pleasure-loving period
afforded full scope for the most playful fancies of the architect,
decorator, and landscape gardener. It comprised usually a dwelling,
a&nbsp;<i>casino</i> or amusement-house, and many minor edifices,
summer-houses, arcades, etc., disposed in extensive grounds laid out
with terraces, cascades, and shaded alleys. The style was graceful,
sometimes trivial, but almost always pleasing, making free use of stucco
enrichments, both internally and externally, with abundance of gilding
and frescoing. The <b>Villa Madama</b> (1516), by Raphael, with
stucco-decorations by Giulio Romano, though incomplete and now
dilapidated, is a noted example of the style. More complete, the
<b>Villa of Pope Julius</b>, by Vignola (1550), belongs by its purity of
style to this period; its façade well exemplifies the simplicity,
<span class="pagenum">293</span>
<a name="page293" id="page293"> </a>
dignity, and fine proportions of this master’s work. In addition to
these Roman villas may be mentioned the <b>V. Medici</b> (1540, by
<i>Annibale Lippi</i>; now the French Academy of Rome); the <b>Casino
del Papa</b> in the Vatican Gardens, by <i>Pirro Ligorio</i> (1560); the
<b>V. Lante</b>, near Viterbo, and the <b>V. d’Este</b>, at Tivoli, as
displaying among almost countless others the Italian skill in combining
architecture and gardening.</p>

<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig168" id="fig168"> </a>
<img src="images/fig168.jpg" width="205" height="277"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 168.<!-- invisible both . -->&mdash;ANGLE OF COURT OF FARNESE
PALACE, ROME.</p>


<p><b>CHURCHES AND CHAPELS.</b> This period witnessed the building of a
few churches of the first rank, but it was especially prolific in
memorial, votive, and sepulchral chapels added to churches already
existing, like the <b>Chigi Chapel</b> of S.&nbsp;M. del Popolo, by
Raphael. The earlier churches of this period generally followed
antecedent types, with the dome as the central feature dominating a
cruciform plan, and simple, unostentatious and sometimes uninteresting
exteriors. Among them may be mentioned: at Pistoia, S.&nbsp;M. del Letto
and <b>S.&nbsp;M. dell’ Umiltà</b>, the latter a fine domical rotunda by
<i>Ventura Vitoni</i> (1509), with an imposing vestibule; at Venice,
<b>S.&nbsp;Salvatore</b>, by <i>Tullio Lombardo</i> (1530), an admirable
edifice with alternating domical and barrel-vaulted bays;
<b>S.&nbsp;Georgio dei Grechi</b> (1536), by <i>Sansovino</i>, and
S.&nbsp;M. Formosa; at Todi, the <b>Madonna della Consolazione</b>
(1510), by <i>Cola da Caprarola</i>, a&nbsp;charming design with a high
dome and four apses; at Montefiascone, the <b>Madonna delle Grazie</b>,
by <i>Sammichele</i> (1523), besides several churches at Bologna,
Ferrara, Prato, Sienna, and Rome of almost or quite equal
<span class="pagenum">294</span>
<a name="page294" id="page294"> </a>
interest. In these churches one may trace the development of the dome as
an external feature, while in <b>S.&nbsp;Biagio</b>, at Montepulciano,
the effort was made by <i>Ant. da San Gallo the Elder</i> to combine
with it the contrasting lines of two campaniles, of which, however, but
one was completed.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig169" id="fig169"> </a>
<img src="images/fig169.png" width="241" height="240"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 169.&mdash;ORIGINAL PLAN OF ST. PETER’S, ROME.</p>

<p><b>ST. PETER’S.</b> The culmination of Renaissance church
architecture was reached in <b>St. Peter’s</b>, at Rome. The original
project of Nicholas&nbsp;V. having lapsed with his death, it was the
intention of Julius II. to erect on the same site a stupendous mausoleum
over the monument he had ordered of Michael Angelo. The design of
Bramante, who began its erection in 1506, comprised a Greek cross with
apsidal arms, the four angles occupied by domical chapels and loggias
within a square outline (Fig. 169). The too hasty execution of this
noble design led to the collapse of two of the arches under the dome,
and to long delays after Bramante’s death in 1514. Raphael, Giuliano da
San Gallo, Peruzzi, and A.&nbsp;da San Gallo the Younger successively
supervised the works under the popes from Leo&nbsp;X. to Paul III., and
devised a vast number of plans for its completion. Most of these
involved fundamental alterations of the original scheme, and were
motived by the abandonment of the proposed monument of Julius II.;
a&nbsp;church, and not a mausoleum, being in consequence required. In
1546 Michael Angelo was assigned by Paul III. to the works, and gave
final form to the general design in a simplified
<span class="pagenum">295</span>
<a name="page295" id="page295"> </a>
version of Bramante’s plan with more massive supports, a&nbsp;square
east front with a portico for the chief entrance, and the unrivalled
<b>Dome</b>, which is its most striking feature. This dome, slightly
altered and improved in curvature by della Porta after M.&nbsp;Angelo’s
death in 1564, was completed by <i>D.&nbsp;Fontana</i> in 1604. It is
the most majestic creation of the Renaissance, and one of the greatest
architectural conceptions of all history. It measures 140 feet in
internal diameter, and with its two shells rises from a lofty drum,
buttressed by coupled Corinthian columns, to a height of 405 feet to the
top of the lantern. The church, as left by Michael Angelo, was
harmonious in its proportions, though the single order used internally
and externally dwarfed by its colossal scale the vast dimensions of the
edifice. Unfortunately in 1606 <i>C.&nbsp;Maderna</i> was employed by
Paul&nbsp;V. to lengthen the nave by two bays, destroying the
proportions of the whole, and hiding the dome from view on a near
approach. The present tasteless façade was Maderna’s work. The splendid
atrium or portico added (1629&ndash;67), by <i>Bernini</i>, as an
approach, mitigates but does not cure the ugliness and pettiness of this
front.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig170" id="fig170"> </a>
<img src="images/fig170.png" width="228" height="336"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 170.&mdash;PLAN OF ST. PETER’S, ROME, AS NOW STANDING.</p>

<p class="caption">
The portion below the line <i>A</i>,&nbsp;<i>B</i>, and the side chapels
<i>C</i>,&nbsp;<i>D</i>, were added by Maderna. The remainder represents
Michael Angelo’s plan.</p>

<p>St. Peter’s as thus completed (Fig. 170) is the largest
<span class="pagenum">296</span>
<a name="page296" id="page296"> </a>
church in existence, and in many respects is architecturally worthy of
its pre-eminence. The central aisle, nearly 600 feet long, with its
stupendous panelled and gilded vault, 83 feet in span, the vast central
area and the majestic dome, belong to a conception unsurpassed in
majestic simplicity and effectiveness. The construction is almost
excessively massive, but admirably disposed. On the other hand the nave
is too long, and the details not only lack originality and interest, but
are also too large and coarse in scale, dwarfing the whole edifice. The
interior (Fig. 171) is wanting in the sobriety of color that befits so
stately a design; it suggests rather a pagan temple than a Christian
basilica. These faults reveal the decline of taste which had already set
in before Michael Angelo took charge of the work, and which appears even
in the works of that master.</p>


<p><b>THE PERIOD OF FORMAL CLASSICISM.</b> With the middle of the 16th
century the classic orders began to dominate all architectural design.
While Vignola, who wrote a treatise upon the orders, employed them with
unfailing refinement and judgment, his contemporaries showed less
discernment and taste, making of them an end rather than a means. Too
often mere classical correctness was substituted for the fundamental
qualities of original invention and intrinsic beauty of composition. The
innovation of colossal orders extending through several stories, while
it gave to exterior designs a certain grandeur of scale, tended to
coarseness and even vulgarity of detail. Sculpture and ornament began to
lose their refinement; and while street-architecture gained in
monumental scale, and public squares received a more stately adornment
than ever before, the street-façades individually were too often bare
and uninteresting in their correct formality. In the interiors of
churches and large halls there appears a struggle between a cold and
dignified simplicity and a growing tendency toward pretentious sham. But
these pernicious tendencies did
<span class="pagenum">299</span>
<a name="page299" id="page299"> </a>
not fully mature till the latter part of the century, and the
half-century after 1540 or 1550 was prolific of notable works in both
ecclesiastical and secular architecture. The names of Michael Angelo and
Vignola, whose careers began in the preceding period; of Palladio and
della Porta (1541&ndash;1604) in Rome; of Sammichele and Sansovino in
Verona and Venice, and of Galeazzo Alessi in Genoa, stand high in the
ranks of architectural merit.</p>

<span class="pagenum">[297]</span>
<a name="page297" id="page297"> </a>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig171" id="fig171"> </a>
<img src="images/fig171.jpg" width="477" height="289"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 171.&mdash;INTERIOR OF ST. PETER’S, ROME.</p>

<a name="page298" id="page298"> </a>
<!-- moved two pages -->


<p><b>CHURCHES.</b> The type established by St. Peter’s was widely
imitated throughout Italy. The churches in which a Greek or Latin cross
is dominated by a high dome rising from a drum and terminating in a
lantern, and is treated both internally and externally with Roman
Corinthian pilasters and arches, are almost numberless. Among the best
churches of this type is the <b>Gesù</b> at Rome, by Vignola (1568),
with a highly ornate interior of excellent proportions and a less
interesting exterior, the façade adorned with two stories of orders and
great flanking volutes over the sides (see <a href="#page277">p.&nbsp;277</a>). Two churches at Venice, by
<i>Palladio</i>&mdash;<b>S.&nbsp;Giorgio Maggiore</b> (1560; façade by
<i>Scamozzi</i>, 1575) and the <b>Redentore</b>&mdash;offer a strong
contrast to the Gesù, in their cold and almost bare but pure and correct
design. An imitation of Bramante’s plan for St. Peter’s appears in
<b>S.&nbsp;M. di Carignano</b>, at Genoa, by <i>Galeazzo Alessi</i>
(1500&ndash;72), begun 1552, a&nbsp;fine structure, though inferior in
scale and detail to its original. Besides these and other important
churches there were many large domical chapels of great splendor added
to earlier churches; of these the <b>Chapel of Sixtus&nbsp;V.</b> in
S.&nbsp;M. Maggiore, at Rome, by <i>D.&nbsp;Fontana</i>
(1543&ndash;1607), is an excellent example.</p>


<p><b>PALACES: ROME.</b> The palaces on the Capitoline Hill, built at
different dates (1540&ndash;1644) from designs by Michael Angelo,
illustrate the palace architecture of this period, and the imposing
effect of a single colossal order running through two stories. This
treatment, though well adapted
<span class="pagenum">300</span>
<a name="page300" id="page300"> </a>
to produce monumental effects in large squares, was dangerous in its
bareness and heaviness of scale, and was better suited for buildings of
vast dimensions than for ordinary street-façades. In other Roman palaces
of this time the traditions of the preceding period still prevailed, as
in the <b>Sapienza</b> (University), by della Porta (1575), which has a
dignified court and a façade of great refinement without columns or
pilasters. The <b>Papal palaces</b> built by Domenico Fontana on the
Lateran, Quirinal, and Vatican hills, between 1574 and 1590, externally
copying the style of the Farnese, show a similar return to earlier
models, but are less pure and refined in detail than the Sapienza. The
great pentagonal <b>Palace of Caprarola</b>, near Rome, by Vignola, is
perhaps the most successful and imposing production of the Roman classic
school.</p>


<p><b>VERONA.</b> Outside of Rome, palace-building took on various local
and provincial phases of style, of which the most important were the
closely related styles of Verona, Venice, and Vicenza. <i>Michele
Sammichele</i> (1484&ndash;1549), who built in Verona the
<b>Bevilacqua</b>, <b>Canossa</b>, <b>Pompei</b>, and <b>Verzi</b>
palaces and the four chief city gates, and in Venice the
<b>P.&nbsp;Grimani</b>, his masterpiece (1550), was a designer of great
originality and power. He introduced into his military architecture, as
in the gates of Verona, the use of rusticated orders, which he treated
with skill and taste. The idea was copied by later architects and
applied, with doubtful propriety, to palace-façades; though Ammanati’s
garden-façade for the Pitti palace, in Florence (cir. 1560), is an
impressive and successful design.</p>


<p><b>VENICE.</b> Into the development of the maturing classic style
<i>Giacopo Tatti Sansovino</i> (1477&ndash;1570) introduced in his
Venetian buildings new elements of splendor. Coupled columns between
arches themselves supported on columns, and a profusion of figure
sculpture, gave to his palace-façades a hitherto unknown magnificence of
effect, as
<span class="pagenum">301</span>
<a name="page301" id="page301"> </a>
in the <b>Library of St. Mark</b> (now the Royal Palace, Fig. 172), and
the <b>Cornaro</b> palace (P.&nbsp;Corner de Cà Grande), both dating
from about 1530&ndash;40. So strongly did he impress upon Venice these
ornate and sumptuous variations on classic themes, that later architects
adhered, in a very debased period, to the main features and spirit of
his work.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig172" id="fig172"> </a>
<img src="images/fig172.jpg" width="249" height="420"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 172.&mdash;LIBRARY OF ST. MARK, VENICE.</p>


<p><b>VICENZA.</b> Of <i>Palladio’s</i> churches in Venice we have
already spoken; his palaces are mainly to be found in his native city,
Vicenza. In these structures he displayed great fertility of invention
and a profound familiarity with the classic orders, but the degenerate
taste of the Baroque period already begins to show itself in his work.
There is far less of architectural propriety and grace in these
pretentious palaces, with their colossal orders and their affectation of
grandeur, than in the designs of Vignola or Sammichele. Wood and
plaster, used to mimic stone, indicate the approaching reign of sham in
all design (<b>P.&nbsp;Barbarano</b>, 1570; <b>Chieregati</b>, 1560;
<b>Tiene</b>, <b>Valmarano</b>, 1556; <b>Villa Capra</b>). His
masterpiece is the two-storied arcade about the mediæval
<b>Basilica</b>, in which the arches are supported on a minor order
between engaged columns serving
<span class="pagenum">302</span>
<a name="page302" id="page302"> </a>
as buttresses. This treatment has in consequence ever since been known
as the <i>Palladian Motive</i>.</p>


<p><b>GENOA.</b> During the second half of the sixteenth century a
remarkable series of palaces was erected in Genoa, especially notable
for their great courts and imposing staircases. These last were given
unusual prominence owing to differences of level in the courts, arising
from the slope of their sites on the hillside. Many of these palaces
were by Galeazzo Alessi (1502&ndash;72); others by architects of lesser
note; but nearly all characterized by their effective planning, fine
stairs and loggias, and strong and dignified, if sometimes
uninteresting, detail (<b>P.&nbsp;Balbi</b>, <b>Brignole</b>,
<b>Cambiasi</b>, <b>Doria-Tursi</b> [or Municipio], <b>Durazzo</b> [or
Reale], <b>Pallavicini</b>, and <b>University</b>).</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig173" id="fig173"> </a>
<img src="images/fig173.jpg" width="248" height="393"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 173.&mdash;INTERIOR OF SAN SEVERO, NAPLES.</p>


<p><b>THE BAROQUE STYLE.</b> A reaction from the cold <i>classicismo</i>
of the late sixteenth century showed itself in the following period, in
the lawless and vulgar extravagances of the so-called <i>Baroque</i>
style. The wealthy Jesuit order was a notorious contributor to the
debasement of architectural taste. Most of the Jesuit churches and many
others not belonging to the order, but following its <ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘pernicous’">pernicious</ins> example,
are monuments of bad taste and pretentious sham. Broken
<span class="pagenum">303</span>
<a name="page303" id="page303"> </a>
and contorted pediments, huge scrolls, heavy mouldings, ill-applied
sculpture in exaggerated attitudes, and a general disregard for
architectural propriety characterized this period, especially in its
church architecture, to whose style the name <i>Jesuit</i> is often
applied. Sham marble and heavy and excessive gilding were universal
(Fig. 173). <i>C.&nbsp;Maderna</i> (1556&ndash;1629), <i>Lorenzo
Bernini</i> (1589&ndash;1680), and <i>F.&nbsp;Borromini</i>
(1599&ndash;1667) were the worst offenders of the period, though Bernini
was an artist of undoubted ability, as proved by his colonnades or
atrium in front of St. Peter’s. There were, however, architects of purer
taste whose works even in that debased age were worthy of
admiration.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig174" id="fig174"> </a>
<img src="images/fig174.jpg" width="271" height="372"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 174.&mdash;CHURCH OF S. M. DELLA SALUTE, VENICE.</p>


<p><b>BAROQUE CHURCHES.</b> The Baroque style prevailed in church
architecture for almost two centuries. The majority of the churches
present varieties of the cruciform plan crowned by a high dome which is
usually the best part of the design. Everywhere else the vices of the
period appear in these churches, especially in their façades and
internal decoration. <b>S.&nbsp;M. della Vittoria</b>, by Maderna, and
<b>Sta. Agnese</b>, by Borromini, both at Rome, are examples of the
<span class="pagenum">304</span>
<a name="page304" id="page304"> </a>
style. Naples is particularly full of Baroque churches (Fig. 173),
a&nbsp;few of which, like the <b>Gesù Nuovo</b> (1584), are dignified
and creditable designs. The domical church of <b>S.&nbsp;M. della
Salute</b>, at Venice (1631), by Longhena, is also a majestic edifice in
excellent style (Fig. 174), and here and there other churches offer
exceptions to the prevalent baseness of architecture. Particularly
objectionable was the wholesale disfigurement of existing monuments by
ruthless remodelling, as in S.&nbsp;John Lateran, at Rome, the
cathedrals of Ferrara and Ravenna, and many others.</p>


<p><b>PALACES.</b> These were generally superior to the churches, and
not infrequently impressive and dignified structures. The two best
examples in Rome are the <b>P.&nbsp;Borghese</b>, by <i>Martino Lunghi
the Elder</i> (1590), with a fine court arcade on coupled Doric and
Ionic columns, and the <b>P.&nbsp;Barberini</b>, by Maderna and
Borromini, with an elliptical staircase by Bernini, one of the few
palaces in Italy with projecting lateral wings. In Venice, Longhena, in
the <b>Rezzonico</b> and <b>Pesaro</b> palaces (1650&ndash;80), showed
his freedom from the mannerisms of the age by reproducing successfully
the ornate but dignified style of Sansovino (see <a href="#page301">p.&nbsp;301</a>). At Naples D.&nbsp;Fontana, whose works
overlap the Baroque period, produced in the <b>Royal Palace</b> (1600)
and the <b>Royal Museum</b> (1586&ndash;1615) designs of considerable
dignity, in some respects superior to his papal residences in Rome. In
suburban villas, like the <b>Albani</b> and <b>Borghese</b> villas near
Rome, the ostentatious style of the Decline found free and congenial
expression.</p>


<p><b>LATER MONUMENTS.</b> In the few eighteenth-century buildings which
are worthy of mention there is noticeable a reaction from the
extravagances of the seventeenth century, shown in the dignified
correctness of the exteriors and the somewhat frigid splendor of the
interiors. The most notable work of this period is the <b>Royal
Palace</b> at <b>Caserta</b>, by <i>Van Vitelli</i> (1752), an architect
of considerable taste and inventiveness, considering his time. This
great palace, 800
<span class="pagenum">305</span>
<a name="page305" id="page305"> </a>
feet square, encloses four fine courts, and is especially remarkable for
the simple if monotonous dignity of the well proportioned exterior and
the effective planning of its three octagonal vestibules, its ornate
chapel and noble staircase. Staircases, indeed, were among the most
successful features of late Italian architecture, as in the <b>Scala
Regia</b> of the Vatican, and in the Corsini, Braschi, and Barberini
palaces at Rome, the Royal Palace at Naples, etc.</p>

<p>In church architecture the <b>east front</b> of <b>S.&nbsp;John
Lateran</b> in Rome, by <i>Galilei</i> (1734), and the whole
<b>exterior</b> of <b>S.&nbsp;M. Maggiore</b>, by <i>Ferd. Fuga</i>
(1743), are noteworthy designs: the former an especially powerful
conception, combining a colossal order with two smaller orders in
superposed <i>loggie</i>, but marred by the excessive scale of the
statues which crown it. The <b>Fountain</b> of <b>Trevi</b>, conceived
in much the same spirit (1735, by <i>Niccola Salvi</i>), is a striking
piece of decorative architecture. The Sacristy of St. Peter’s, by
<i>Marchionne</i> (1775), also deserves mention as a monumental and not
uninteresting work. In the early years of the present century the
<b>Braccio Nuovo</b> of the Vatican, by <i>Stern</i>, the imposing
church of <b>S.&nbsp;Francesco di Paola</b> at Naples, by
<i>Bianchi</i>, designed in partial imitation of the Pantheon, and the
great <b>S.&nbsp;Carlo Theatre</b> at Naples, show the same coldly
classical spirit, not wholly without merit, but lacking in true
originality and freedom of conception.</p>


<p><b>CAMPANILES.</b> The <b>campaniles</b> of the Renaissance and
Decline deserve at least passing reference, though they are neither
numerous nor often of conspicuous interest. That of the
<b>Campidoglio</b> (Capitol) at Rome, by Martino Lunghi, is a good
example of the classical type. Venetia possesses a number of graceful
and lofty bell-towers, generally of brick with marble bell-stages, of
which the upper part of the <b>Campanile</b> of <b>St. Mark</b> and the
tower of S.&nbsp;Giorgio Maggiore are the finest examples.</p>

<p>The Decline attained what the early Renaissance aimed
<span class="pagenum">306</span>
<a name="page306" id="page306"> </a>
at&mdash;the revival of Roman forms. But it was no longer a Renaissance;
it was a decrepit and unimaginative art, held in the fetters of a
servile imitation, copying the letter rather than the spirit of antique
design. It was the mistaken and abject worship of precedent which
started architecture upon its downward path and led to the atrocious
products of the seventeenth century.</p>


<div class="monuments">

<p><b>MONUMENTS</b> (mainly in addition to those mentioned in the text).
<span class="smallcaps">15th Century</span>&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Florence</span>: Foundling Hospital (Innocenti), 1421; Old
Sacristy and Cloister S.&nbsp;Lorenzo; P.&nbsp;Quaratesi, 1440;
cloisters at Sta. Croce and Certosa, all by Brunelleschi; façade
S.&nbsp;M. Novella, by Alberti, 1456; Badia at Fiesole, from designs of
Brunelleschi, 1462; Court of P.&nbsp;Vecchio, by Michelozzi, 1464
(altered and enriched, 1565); P.&nbsp;Guadagni, by Cronaca, 1490; Hall
of 500 in P.&nbsp;Vecchio, by same, 1495.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Venice</span>: S.&nbsp;Zaccaria, by Martino Lombardo,
1457&ndash;1515; S.&nbsp;Michele, by Moro Lombardo, 1466; S.&nbsp;M. del
Orto, 1473; S.&nbsp;Giovanni Crisostomo, by Moro Lombardo, atrium of
S.&nbsp;Giovanni Evangelista, Procurazie Vecchie, all 1481; Scuola di
S.&nbsp;Marco, by Martino Lombardo, 1490; P.&nbsp;Dario;
P.&nbsp;Corner-Spinelli.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Ferrara</span>:
P.&nbsp;Schifanoja, 1469; P.&nbsp;Scrofa or Costabili, 1485; S.&nbsp;M.
in Vado, P.&nbsp;dei Diamanti, P.&nbsp;Bevilacqua, S.&nbsp;Francesco,
S.&nbsp;Benedetto, S.&nbsp;Cristoforo, all 1490&ndash;1500.&mdash;<span
class="smallcaps">Milan</span>: Ospedale Grande (or Maggiore), begun
1457 by Filarete, extended by Bramante, cir. 1480&ndash;90 (great court
by Richini, 17th century); S.&nbsp;M. delle Grazie, E.&nbsp;end,
Sacristy of S.&nbsp;Satiro, S.&nbsp;M. presso S.&nbsp;Celso, all by
Bramante, 1477&ndash;1499.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Rome</span>:
S.&nbsp;Pietro in Montorio, 1472; S.&nbsp;M. del Popolo, 1475?; Sistine
Chapel of Vatican, 1475; S.&nbsp;Agostino, 1483.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Sienna</span>: Loggia del Papa and P.&nbsp;Nerucci, 1460;
P.&nbsp;del Governo, 1469&ndash;1500; P.&nbsp;Spannocchi, 1470; Sta.
Catarina, 1490, by di Bastiano and Federighi, church later by Peruzzi;
Library in cathedral by L.&nbsp;Marina, 1497; Oratory of
S.&nbsp;Bernardino, by Turrapili, 1496.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Pienza</span>: Cathedral, Bishop’s Palace (Vescovado),
P.&nbsp;Pubblico, all cir. 1460, by B.&nbsp;di Lorenzo (or Rosselini?).
<span class="smallcaps">Elsewhere</span> (in chronological order):
Arch of Alphonso, Naples, 1443, by P.&nbsp;di Martino; Oratory
S.&nbsp;Bernardino, Perugia, by di Duccio, 1461; Church over Casa-Santa,
Loreto, 1465&ndash;1526; P.&nbsp;del Consiglio at Verona, by Fra
Giocondo, 1476; Capella Colleoni, Bergamo, 1476; S.&nbsp;M. in Organo,
Verona, 1481; Porta Capuana, Naples, by Giul. da Majano, 1484; Madonna
della Croce, Crema, by B.&nbsp;Battagli, 1490&ndash;1556; Madonna di
Campagna and S.&nbsp;Sisto, Piacenza, both 1492&ndash;1511;
P.&nbsp;Bevilacqua, Bologna, by Nardi, 1492 (?); P.&nbsp;Gravina,
Naples; P.&nbsp;Fava, Bologna; P.&nbsp;Pretorio, Lucca; S.&nbsp;M. dei
Miracoli Brescia; all at close of 15th century.</p>

<span class="pagenum">307</span>
<a name="page307" id="page307"> </a>

<p><span class="smallcaps">16th Century</span>&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Rome</span>: P.&nbsp;Sora, 1501; S.&nbsp;M. della Pace and
cloister, 1504, both by Bramante (façade of church by P.&nbsp;da
Cortona, 17th century); S.&nbsp;M. di Loreto, 1507, by A.&nbsp;da San
Gallo the Elder; P.&nbsp;Vidoni, by Raphael; P.&nbsp;Lante, 1520; Vigna
Papa Giulio, 1534, by Peruzzi; P.&nbsp;dei Conservatori, 1540, and
P.&nbsp;del Senatore, 1563 (both on Capitol), by M.&nbsp;Angelo,
Vignola, and della Porta; Sistine Chapel in S.&nbsp;M. Maggiore, 1590;
S.&nbsp;Andrea della Valle, 1591, by Olivieri (façade, 1670, by
Rainaldi).&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Florence</span>: Medici
Chapel of S.&nbsp;Lorenzo, new <ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘sacristry’">sacristy</ins> of same, and Laurentian Library, all
by M.&nbsp;Angelo, 1529&ndash;40; Mercato Nuovo, 1547, by B.&nbsp;Tasso;
P.&nbsp;degli Uffizi, 1560&ndash;70, by Vasari; P.&nbsp;Giugni, <ins
class="correction" title="text reads ‘-1560’: corrected from 8th edition">1560&ndash;8</ins>.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Venice</span>: P.&nbsp;Camerlinghi, 1525, by Bergamasco;
S.&nbsp;Francesco della Vigna, by Sansovino, 1539, façade by Palladio,
1568; Zecca or Mint, 1536, and Loggetta of Campanile, 1540, by
Sansovino<a class="tag" name="tag25" id="tag25" href="#note25">25</a>, Procurazie Nuove, 1584, by Scamozzi.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Verona</span>: Capella Pellegrini in S.&nbsp;Bernardino,
1514; City Gates, by Sammichele, 1530&ndash;40 (Porte Nuova, Stuppa,
S.&nbsp;Zeno, S.&nbsp;Giorgio).&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Vicenza</span>: P.&nbsp;Porto, 1552; Teatro Olimpico, 1580;
both by Palladio.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Genoa</span>:
P.&nbsp;Andrea Doria, by Montorsoli, 1529; P.&nbsp;Ducale, by Pennone,
1550; P.&nbsp;Lercari, P.&nbsp;Spinola, P.&nbsp;Sauli, P.&nbsp;Marcello
Durazzo, all by Gal. Alessi, cir. 1550; Sta. Annunziata, 1587, by della
Porta; Loggia dei Banchi, end of 16th century.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Elsewhere</span> (in chronological order).
P.&nbsp;Roverella, Ferrara, 1508; P.&nbsp;del Magnifico, Sienna, 1508,
by Cozzarelli; P.&nbsp;Communale, Brescia, 1508, by Formentone;
P.&nbsp;Albergati, Bologna, 1510; P.&nbsp;Ducale, Mantua, 1520&ndash;40;
P.&nbsp;Giustiniani, Padua, by Falconetto, 1524; Ospedale del Ceppo,
Pistoia, 1525; Madonna delle Grazie, Pistoia, by Vitoni, 1535;
P.&nbsp;Buoncampagni-Ludovisi, Bologna, 1545; Cathedral, Padua, 1550, by
Righetti and della Valle, after M.&nbsp;Angelo; P.&nbsp;Bernardini,
1560, and P.&nbsp;Ducale, 1578, at Lucca, both by Ammanati.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">17th Century</span>: Chapel of the Princes
in S.&nbsp;Lorenzo, Florence, 1604, by Nigetti; S.&nbsp;Pietro, Bologna,
1605; S.&nbsp;Andrea delle Fratte, Rome, 1612; Villa Borghese, Rome,
1616, by Vasanzio; P.&nbsp;Contarini delle Scrigni, Venice, by Scamozzi;
Badia at Florence, rebuilt 1625 by Segaloni; S.&nbsp;Ignazio, Rome,
1626&ndash;85; Museum of the Capitol, Rome, 1644&ndash;50; Church of Gli
Scalzi, Venice, 1649; P.&nbsp;Pesaro, Venice, by Longhena, 1650;
S.&nbsp;Moisé, Venice, 1668; Brera Palace, Milan; S.&nbsp;M. Zobenigo,
Venice, 1680; Dogana di Mare, Venice, 1686, by Benone; Santi Apostoli,
Rome.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">18th and early 19th Century</span>:
Gesuati, at Venice, 1715&ndash;30; S.&nbsp;Geremia, Venice, 1753, by
Corbellini; P.&nbsp;Braschi, Rome, by Morelli, 1790; Nuova Fabbrica,
Venice, 1810.</p>
</div>

<div class="footnote">

<p><a name="note24" id="note24" href="#tag24">24.</a>
See <a href="#appC">Appendix C</a>.</p>

<p><a name="note25" id="note25" href="#tag25">25.</a>
See <a href="#appB">Appendix B</a>.</p>

</div>

<span class="pagenum">308</span>
<a name="page308" id="page308"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXXII" id="chapXXII">CHAPTER XXII.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
RENAISSANCE ARCHITECTURE IN FRANCE.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before,
Fergusson, Müntz, Palustre. Also Berty, <i>La Renaissance monumentale en
France</i>. Château, <i>Histoire et caractères de l’architecture en
France</i>. Daly, <i>Motifs historiques d’architecture et de
sculpture</i>. De Laborde, <i>La Renaissance des arts à la cour de
France</i>. Du Cerceau, <i>Les plus excellents bastiments de France</i>.
Lübke, <i>Geschichte der Renaissance in Frankreich</i>. Mathews, <i>The
Renaissance under the Valois Kings</i>. Palustre, <i>La Renaissance en
France</i>. Pattison, <i>The Renaissance of the Fine Arts in France</i>.
Rouyer et Darcel, <i>L’Art architectural en France</i>. Sauvageot,
<i>Choix de palais, châteaux, hôtels, et maisons de France</i>.</p>


<p><b>ORIGIN AND CHARACTER.</b> The vitality and richness of the Gothic
style in France, even in its decline in the fifteenth century, long
stood in the way of any general introduction of classic forms. When the
Renaissance appeared, it came as a foreign importation, introduced from
Italy by the king and the nobility. It underwent a protracted
transitional phase, during which the national Gothic forms and
traditions were picturesquely mingled with those of the Renaissance. The
campaigns of Charles VIII. (1489), Louis XII. (1499), and
Francis&nbsp;I. (1515), in vindication of their claims to the thrones of
Naples and Milan, brought these monarchs and their nobles into contact
with the splendid material and artistic civilization of Italy, then in
the full tide of the maturing Renaissance. They returned to France,
filled with the ambition to rival the splendid palaces and gardens of
Italy, taking with them Italian artists to teach their arts to the
French. But while these Italians successfully
<span class="pagenum">309</span>
<a name="page309" id="page309"> </a>
introduced many classic elements and details into French architecture,
they wholly failed to dominate the French master-masons and <i>tailleurs
de pierre</i> in matters of planning and general composition. The early
Renaissance architecture of France is consequently wholly unlike the
Italian, from which it derived only minor details and a certain
largeness and breadth of spirit.</p>


<p><b>PERIODS.</b> The French Renaissance and its sequent developments
may be broadly divided into three periods, with subdivisions coinciding
more or less closely with various reigns, as follows:</p>

<p>I. <span class="smallcaps">The Valois Period</span>, or Renaissance
proper, 1483&ndash;1589, subdivided into:</p>

<p><i>a.</i> <span class="smallcaps">The Transition</span>, comprising
the reigns of Charles VIII. and Louis XII. (1483&ndash;1515), and the
early years of that of Francis&nbsp;I.; characterized by a picturesque
mixture of classic details with Gothic conceptions.</p>

<p><i>b.</i> <span class="smallcaps">The Style of Francis I.</span>,
or Early Renaissance, from about 1520 to that king’s death in 1547;
distinguished by a remarkable variety and grace of composition and
beauty of detail.</p>

<p><i>c.</i> <span class="smallcaps">The Advanced Renaissance</span>,
comprising the reigns of Henry II. (1547), Francis II. (1559), Charles
IX. (1560), and Henry III. (1574&ndash;89); marked by the gradual
adoption of the classic orders and a decline in the delicacy and
richness of the ornament.</p>

<p>II. <span class="smallcaps">The Bourbon or Classic Period</span>
(1589&ndash;1715):</p>

<p><i>a.</i> <span class="smallcaps">Style of Henry IV.</span>,
covering his reign and partly that of Louis XIII. (1610&ndash;45),
employing the orders and other classic forms with a somewhat heavy,
florid style of ornament.</p>

<p><i>b.</i> <span class="smallcaps">Style of Louis XIV.</span>,
beginning in the preceding reign and extending through that of Louis
XIV. (1645&ndash;1715); the great age of classic architecture in France,
corresponding to the Palladian in Italy.</p>

<span class="pagenum">310</span>
<a name="page310" id="page310"> </a>
<p>III. <span class="smallcaps">The Decline or Rococo Period</span>,
corresponding with the reign of Louis XV. (1715&ndash;74); marked by
pompous extravagance and capriciousness.</p>

<p>During this period a reaction set in toward a severer classicism,
leading to the styles of Louis XVI. and of the Empire, to be treated of
in a later chapter.</p>


<p><b>THE TRANSITION.</b> As early as 1475 the new style made its
appearance in altars, tombs, and rood-screens wrought by French carvers
with the collaboration of Italian artificers. The tomb erected by
Charles of Anjou to his father in Le Mans cathedral (1475, by
<i>Francesco Laurana</i>), the chapel of St. Lazare in the cathedral of
Marseilles (1483), and the tomb of the children of Charles VIII. in
Tours cathedral (1506), by <i>Michel Columbe</i>, the greatest artist of
his time in France, are examples. The schools of Rouen and Tours were
especially prominent in works of this kind, marked by exuberant fancy
and great delicacy of execution. In church architecture Gothic
traditions were long dominant, in spite of the great numbers of Italian
prelates in France. It was in <i>châteaux</i>, palaces, and dwellings
that the new style achieved its most notable triumphs.</p>


<p><b>EARLY CHÂTEAUX.</b> The castle of Charles VIII., at Amboise on the
Loire, shows little trace of Italian influence. It was under Louis XII.
that the transformation of French architecture really began. The
<b>Château de Gaillon</b> (of which unfortunately only fragments remain
in the École des Beaux-Arts at Paris), built for the Cardinal George of
Amboise, between 1497 and 1509, by <i>Pierre Fain</i>, was the
masterwork of the Rouen school. It presented a curious mixture of
styles, with its irregular plan, its moat, drawbridge, and round
corner-towers, its high roofs, turrets, and dormers, which gave it, in
spite of many Renaissance details, a&nbsp;mediæval picturesqueness. The
<b>Château de Blois</b> (the east and south wings of the present group),
begun for Louis XII. about 1500, was the first of a remarkable series
<span class="pagenum">311</span>
<a name="page311" id="page311"> </a>
of royal palaces which are the glory of French architecture. It shows
the new influences in its horizontal lines and flat, unbroken façades of
brick and stone, rather than in its architectural details (Fig. 175).
The <b>Ducal Palace</b> at Nancy and the <b>Hôtel de Ville</b> at
Orléans, by <i>Viart</i>, show a similar commingling of the classic and
mediæval styles.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig175" id="fig175"> </a>
<img src="images/fig175.jpg" width="245" height="444"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 175.<!-- invisible both . -->&mdash;BLOIS, COURT FAÇADE OF WING OF
LOUIS XII.</p>


<p><b>STYLE OF FRANCIS I.</b> Early in the reign of this monarch, and
partly under the lead of Italian artists, like il Rosso, Serlio, and
Primaticcio, classic elements began to dominate the general composition
and Gothic details rapidly disappeared. A&nbsp;simple and effective
system of exterior design was adopted in the castles and palaces of this
period. Finely moulded belt-courses at the sills and heads of the
windows marked the different stories, and were crossed by a system of
almost equally important vertical lines, formed by superposed pilasters
flanking the windows continuously from basement to roof. The façade was
crowned by a slight cornice and open balustrade, above which rose a
steep and lofty roof, diversified by elaborate dormer windows which were
<span class="pagenum">312</span>
<a name="page312" id="page312"> </a>
adorned with gables and pinnacles (<a href="#fig178">Fig.&nbsp;178</a>). Slender pilasters, treated like long
panels ornamented with arabesques of great beauty, or with a species of
baluster shaft like a candelabrum, were preferred to columns, and were
provided with graceful capitals of the Corinthianesque type. The
mouldings were minute and richly carved; pediments were replaced by
steep gables, and mullioned windows with stone crossbars were used in
preference to the simpler Italian openings. In the earlier monuments
Gothic details were still used occasionally; and round corner-towers,
high dormers, and numerous turrets and pinnacles appear even in the
châteaux of later date.</p>


<p><b>CHURCHES.</b> Ecclesiastical architecture received but scant
attention under Francis&nbsp;I., and, so far as it was practised, still
clung tenaciously to Gothic principles. Among the few important churches
of this period may be mentioned <b>St. Etienne du Mont</b>, at Paris
(1517&ndash;38), in which classic and Gothic features appear in nearly
equal proportions; the east end of <b>St. Pierre</b>, at Caen, with rich
external carving; and the great parish church of <b>St. Eustache</b>, at
Paris (1532, by <i>Lemercier</i>), in which the plan and construction
are purely Gothic, while the details throughout belong to the new style,
though with little appreciation of the spirit and proportions of classic
art. New façades were also built for a number of already existing
churches, among which <b>St. Michel</b>, at Dijon, is conspicuous, with
its vast portal arch and imposing towers. The Gothic towers of Tours
cathedral were completed with Renaissance lanterns or belfries, the
northern in 1507, the southern in 1547.</p>


<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig176" id="fig176"> </a>
<img src="images/fig176.jpg" width="212" height="434"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 176.&mdash;STAIRCASE TOWER, BLOIS.</p>

<p><b>PALACES.</b> To the palace at Blois begun by his predecessor,
Francis&nbsp;I. added a northern and a western wing, completing the
court. The north wing is one of the masterpieces of the style,
presenting toward the court a simple and effective composition, with a
rich but slightly projecting cornice and a high roof with elaborate
dormers. This
<span class="pagenum">313</span>
<a name="page313" id="page313"> </a>
façade is divided into two unequal sections by the open <b>Staircase
Tower</b> (Fig. 176), a&nbsp;<i>chef-d’œuvre</i> in boldness of
construction as well as in delicacy and richness of carving. The outer
façade of this wing is a less ornate but more vigorous design, crowned
by a continuous open loggia under the roof. More extensive than Blois
was <b>Fontainebleau</b>, the favorite residence of the king and of many
of his successors. Following in parts the irregular plan of the convent
it replaced, its other portions were more symmetrically disposed, while
the whole was treated externally in a somewhat severe, semi-classic
style, singularly lacking in ornament. Internally, however, this palace,
begun in 1528 by <i>Gilles Le Breton</i>, was at that time the most
splendid in France, the gallery of Francis&nbsp;I. being especially
noted. The <b>Château</b> of <b>St. Germain</b>, near Paris (1539, by
<i>Pierre Chambiges</i>), is of a very different character. Built
largely of brick, with flat balustraded roof and deep buttresses
carrying three ranges of arches, it is neither Gothic nor classic,
neither fortress nor palace in aspect, but a wholly unique
conception.</p>

<p class="illustration floatleft">
<a name="fig177" id="fig177"> </a>
<img src="images/fig177.png" width="250" height="188"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 177.&mdash;PLAN OF CHAMBORD.<!-- invisible . --></p>

<p>The rural châteaux and hunting-lodges erected by Francis&nbsp;I.
display the greatest diversity of plan and treatment,
<span class="pagenum">314</span>
<a name="page314" id="page314"> </a>
attesting the inventiveness of the French genius, expressing itself in a
new-found language, whose formal canons it disdained. Chief among them
is the <b>Château of Chambord</b> (Figs. 177, 178)&mdash;“a Fata Morgana
in the midst of a wild, woody thicket,” to use Lübke’s language. This
extraordinary edifice, resembling in plan a feudal castle with
curtain-walls, bastions, moat, and donjon, is in its architectural
treatment a palace with arcades, open-stair towers, a&nbsp;noble double
spiral staircase terminating in a graceful lantern, and a roof of the
most bewildering complexity of towers, chimneys, and dormers (1526, by
<i>Pierre le Nepveu</i>). The hunting-lodges of La Muette and Chalvau,
and the so-called <b>Château de Madrid</b>&mdash;all three demolished
during or since the Revolution&mdash;deserve mention, especially
<span class="pagenum">315</span>
<a name="page315" id="page315"> </a>
the last. This consisted of two rectangular pavilions, connected by a
lofty banquet-hall, and adorned externally with arcades in Florentine
style, and with medallions and reliefs of della Robbia ware (1527, by
<i>Gadyer</i>).</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig178" id="fig178"> </a>
<img src="images/fig178.jpg" width="429" height="229"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 178.<!-- invisible . -->&mdash;VIEW OF CHAMBORD.</p>


<p><b>THE LOUVRE.</b> By far the most important of all the architectural
enterprises of this reign, in ultimate results, if not in original
extent, was the beginning of a new palace to replace the old Gothic
fortified palace of the Louvre. To this task Pierre Lescot was summoned
in 1542, and the work of erection actually begun in 1546. The new
palace, in a sumptuous and remarkably dignified classic style, was to
have covered precisely the area of the demolished fortress. Only the
southwest half, comprising two sides of the court, was, however,
undertaken at the outset (Fig. 179). It remained for later monarchs to
amplify the original scheme, and ultimately to complete, late in the
present century, the most extensive and beautiful of all the royal
residences of Europe. (See Figs. <a href="#fig181">181</a>, <a href="#fig208">208</a>, <a href="#fig209">209</a>.)</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig179" id="fig179"> </a>
<img src="images/fig179.jpg" width="263" height="358"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 179.&mdash;DETAIL OF COURT OF LOUVRE, PARIS.<!-- invisible last two
. --></p>

<p>Want of space forbids more than a passing reference to the rural
castles of the nobility, rivalling those of the king. Among them Bury,
La Rochefoucauld, Bournazel, and
<span class="pagenum">316</span>
<a name="page316" id="page316"> </a>
especially <b>Azay-le-Rideau</b> (1520) and <b>Chenonceaux</b>
(1515&ndash;23), may be mentioned, all displaying that love of rural
pleasure, that hatred of the city and its confinement, which so
distinguish the French from the Italian Renaissance.</p>


<p><b>OTHER BUILDINGS.</b> The <b>Hôtel-de-Ville</b> (town hall), of
Paris, begun during this reign, from plans by <i>Domenico di Cortona</i>
(?), and completed under Henry IV., was the most important edifice of a
class which in later periods numbered many interesting structures. The
town hall of <b>Beaugency</b> (1527) is one of the best of minor public
buildings in France, and in its elegant treatment of a simple
two-storied façade may be classed with the <b>Maison
François&nbsp;I.</b>, at Paris. This stood formerly at Moret, whence it
was transported to Paris and re-erected about 1830 in somewhat modified
form. The large city houses of this period are legion; we can mention
only the Hôtel Carnavalet at Paris; the Hôtel Bourgtheroude at Rouen;
the Hôtel d’Écoville at Caen; the archbishop’s palace at Sens, and a
number of houses in Orléans. The <b>Tomb of Louis XII.</b>, at St.
Denis, deserves especial mention for its fine proportions and beautiful
arabesques.</p>


<p><b>THE ADVANCED RENAISSANCE.</b> By the middle of the sixteenth
century the new style had lost much of its earlier charm. The orders,
used with increasing frequency, were more and more conformed to antique
precedents. Façades were flatter and simpler, cornices more pronounced,
arches more Roman in treatment, and a heavier style of carving took the
place of the delicate arabesques of the preceding age. The reigns of
Henry II. (1547&ndash;59) and Charles IX. (1560&ndash;74) were
especially distinguished by the labors of three celebrated architects:
<i>Pierre Lescot</i> (1515&ndash;78), who continued the work on the
southwest angle of the Louvre; <i>Jean Bullant</i> (1515&ndash;78), to
whom are due the right wing of Ecouen and the porch of colossal
Corinthian columns in the left wing of the same, built under
Francis&nbsp;I.; and, finally, <i>Philibert de l’Orme</i>
(1515&ndash;70). <i>Jean Goujon</i> (1510&ndash;72) also
<span class="pagenum">317</span>
<a name="page317" id="page317"> </a>
executed during this period most of the remarkable architectural
sculptures which have made his name one of the most illustrious in the
annals of French art. Chief among the works of de l’Orme was the palace
of the <b>Tuileries</b>, built under Charles IX. for Cathérine de
Médicis, not far from the Louvre, with which it was ultimately connected
by a long gallery. Of the vast plan conceived for this palace, and
comprising a succession of courts and wings, only a part of one side was
erected (1564&ndash;72). This consisted of a domical pavilion, flanked
by low wings only a story and a half high, to which were added two
stories under Henry IV., to the great advantage of the design. Another
masterpiece was the <b>Château d’Anet</b>, built in 1552 by Henry II.
for Diane de Poitiers, of which, unfortunately, only fragments survive.
This beautiful edifice, while retaining the semi-military moat and
bastions of feudal tradition, was planned with classic symmetry, adorned
with superposed orders, court arcades, and rectangular corner-pavilions,
and provided with a domical cruciform chapel, the earliest of its class
in France. All the details were unusually pure and correct, with just
enough of freedom and variety to lend a charm wanting in later works of
the period. To the reign of Henry II. belong also the châteaux of
Ancy-le-Franc, Verneuil, Chantilly (the “petit château,” by Bullant),
the banquet-hall over the bridge at Chenonceaux (1556), several notable
residences at Toulouse, and the tomb of Francis&nbsp;I. at St. Denis.
The châteaux of <b>Pailly</b> and <b>Sully</b>, distinguished by the
sobriety and monumental quality of their composition, in which the
orders are important elements, belong to the reign of Charles IX.,
together with the Tuileries, already mentioned.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig180" id="fig180"> </a>
<img src="images/fig180.jpg" width="414" height="277"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 180.&mdash;THE LUXEMBURG, PARIS.<!-- invisible all . --></p>

<p><b>THE CLASSIC PERIOD: HENRY IV.</b> Under this energetic but
capricious monarch (1589&ndash;1610) and his Florentine queen, Marie de
Médicis, architecture entered upon a new period of activity and a new
stage of development. Without the
<span class="pagenum">318</span>
<a name="page318" id="page318"> </a>
charm of the early Renaissance or the stateliness of the age of Louis
XIV., it has a touch of the Baroque, attributable partly to the
influence of Marie de Médicis and her Italian prelates, and partly to
the Italian training of many of the French architects. The great work of
this period was the extension of the Tuileries by <i>J.&nbsp;B. du
Cerceau</i>, and the completion, by <i>Métézeau</i> and others, of the
long gallery next the Seine, begun under Henry II., with the view of
connecting the Tuileries with the Louvre. In this part of the work
colossal orders were used with indifferent effect. Next in importance
was the addition to Fontainebleau of a great court to the eastward,
whose relatively quiet and dignified style offers less contrast than one
might expect to the other wings and courts dating from Francis&nbsp;I.
More successful architecturally than either of the above was the
<b>Luxemburg</b> palace, built for the queen by <i>Salomon De
Brosse</i>, in 1616 (Fig. 180). Its plan presents the favorite French
arrangement of a main building separated from the street
<span class="pagenum">319</span>
<a name="page319" id="page319"> </a>
by a garden or court, the latter surrounded on three sides by low wings
containing the dependencies. Externally, rusticated orders recall the
garden front of the Pitti at Florence; but the scale is smaller, and the
projecting pavilions and high roofs give it a grace and picturesqueness
wanting in the Florentine model. The <b>Place Royale</b>, at Paris, and
the château of Beaumesnil, illustrate a type of brick-and-stone
architecture much in vogue at this time, stone quoins decorating the
windows and corners, and the orders being generally omitted.</p>

<p>Under Louis XIII. the Tuileries were extended northward and the
Louvre as built by Lescot was doubled in size by the architect
<i>Lemercier</i>, the Pavillon de l’Horloge being added to form the
centre of the enlarged court façade.</p>


<p><b>CHURCHES.</b> To this reign belong also the most important
churches of the period. The church of <b>St. Paul-St. Louis</b>, at
Paris (1627, by <i>Derrand</i>), displays the worst faults of the time,
in the overloaded and meaningless decoration of its uninteresting front.
Its internal dome is the earliest in Paris. Far superior was the chapel
of the <b>Sorbonne</b>, a&nbsp;well-designed domical church by
<i>Lemercier</i>, with a sober and appropriate exterior treated with
superposed orders.</p>


<p><b>PERIOD OF LOUIS XIV.</b> This was an age of remarkable literary
and artistic activity, pompous and pedantic in many of its
manifestations, but distinguished also by productions of a very high
order. Although contemporary with the Italian Baroque&mdash;Bernini
having been the guest of Louis XIV.&mdash;the architecture of this
period was free from the wild extravagances of that style. In its often
cold and correct dignity it resembled rather that of Palladio, making
large use of the orders in exterior design, and tending rather to
monotony than to overloaded decoration. In interior design there was
more of lightness and caprice. Papier-maché and stucco were freely used
in a fanciful style of relief ornamentation by scrolls, wreaths, shells,
etc., and
<span class="pagenum">320</span>
<a name="page320" id="page320"> </a>
decorative panelling was much employed. The whole was saved from
triviality only by the controlling lines of the architecture which
framed it. But it was better suited to cabinet-work or to the
prettinesses of the boudoir than to monumental interiors. The <b>Galerie
d’Apollon</b>, built during this reign over the Petite Galerie in the
Louvre, escapes this reproach, however, by the sumptuous dignity of its
interior treatment.</p>


<p><b>VERSAILLES.</b> This immense edifice, built about an already
existing villa of Louis XIII., was the work of <i>Levau</i> and
<i>J.&nbsp;H. Mansart</i> (1647&ndash;1708). Its erection, with the
laying out of its marvellous park, almost exhausted the resources of the
realm, but with results quite incommensurate with the outlay. In spite
of its vastness, its exterior is commonplace; the orders are used with
singular monotony, which is not redeemed by the deep breaks and
projections of the main front. There is no controlling or dominant
feature; there is no adequate entrance or approach; the grand staircases
are badly placed and unworthily treated, and the different elements of
the plan are combined with singular lack of the usual French sense of
monumental and rational arrangement. The chapel is by far the best
single feature in the design.</p>

<p>Far more successful was the completion of the Louvre, in 1688, from
the designs of <i>Claude Perrault</i>, the court physician, whose plans
were fortunately adopted in preference to those of Bernini. For the east
front he designed a magnificent Corinthian colonnade nearly 600 feet
long, with coupled columns upon a plain high basement, and with a
central pediment and terminal pavilions (Fig. 181). The whole forms one
of the most imposing façades in existence; but it is a mere decoration,
having no practical relation to the building behind it. Its height
required the addition of a third story to match it on the north and
south sides of the court, which as thus completed quadrupled the
original area
<span class="pagenum">321</span>
<a name="page321" id="page321"> </a>
proposed by Lescot. Fortunately the style of Lescot’s work was retained
throughout in the court façades, while externally the colonnade was
recalled on the south front by a colossal order of pilasters. The Louvre
as completed by Louis XIV. was a stately and noble palace, as remarkable
for the surpassing excellence of the sculptures of Jean Goujon as for
the dignity and beauty of its architecture. Taken in connection with the
Tuileries, it was unrivalled by any palace in Europe except the
Vatican.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig181" id="fig181"> </a>
<img src="images/fig181.jpg" width="432" height="248"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 181.<!-- invisible . -->&mdash;COLONNADE OF LOUVRE.</p>


<p><b>OTHER BUILDINGS.</b> To Louis XIV. is also due the vast but
uninteresting <b>Hôtel des Invalides</b> or veteran’s asylum, at Paris,
by J.&nbsp;H. Mansart. To the chapel of this institution was added, in
1680&ndash;1706, the celebrated <b>Dome</b> of the Invalides,
a&nbsp;masterpiece by the same architect. In plan it somewhat resembles
Bramante’s scheme for St. Peter’s&mdash;a&nbsp;Greek cross with domical
chapels in the four angles and a dome over the centre. The exterior
(Fig. 182), with the lofty gilded dome on a high drum adorned with
engaged columns, is somewhat high for its breadth, but is a
<span class="pagenum">322</span>
<a name="page322" id="page322"> </a>
harmonious and impressive design; and the interior, if somewhat cold, is
elegant and well proportioned. The chief innovation in the design was
the wide separation of the interior stone dome from the lofty exterior
decorative cupola and lantern of wood, this separation being designed to
meet the conflicting demands of internal and external effect. To the
same architect is due the formal monotony of the <b>Place Vendôme</b>,
all the houses surrounding it being treated with a uniform architecture
of colossal pilasters, at once monumental and inappropriate. One of the
most pleasing designs of the time is the <b>Château de Maisons</b>
(1658), by <i>F.&nbsp;Mansart</i>, uncle of J.&nbsp;H. Mansart. In this
the proportions of the central and terminal pavilions, the mass and
lines of the steep roof <i>à&nbsp;la Mansarde</i>, the simple and
effective use of the orders, and the refinement of all the details
impart a grace of aspect rare in contemporary works. The same qualities
appear also in the <b>Val-de-Grâce</b>, by F.&nbsp;Mansart and
Lemercier, a&nbsp;domical church of excellent proportions begun under
Louis XIII. The want of space forbids mention of other buildings of this
period.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig182" id="fig182"> </a>
<img src="images/fig182.jpg" width="263" height="459"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 182.&mdash;DOME OF THE INVALIDES.<!-- invisible last two . --></p>


<span class="pagenum">323</span>
<a name="page323" id="page323"> </a>
<p><b>THE DECLINE.</b> Under Louis XV. the pedantry of the classic
period gave place to a protracted struggle between license and the
severest classical correctness. The exterior designs of this time were
often even more uninteresting and bare than under Louis XIV.; while, on
the other hand, interior decoration tended to the extreme of
extravagance and disregard of constructive propriety. Contorted lines
and crowded scrolls, shells, and palm-leaves adorned the mantelpieces,
cornices, and ceilings, to the almost complete suppression of straight
lines.</p>

<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig183" id="fig183"> </a>
<img src="images/fig183.jpg" width="256" height="295"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 183.&mdash;FAÇADE OF ST. SULPICE, PARIS.</p>

<p>While these tendencies prevailed in many directions,
a&nbsp;counter-current of severe classicism manifested itself in the
designs of a number of important public buildings, in which it was
sought to copy the grandeur of the old Roman colonnades and arcades. The
important church of <b>St. Sulpice</b> at Paris (Fig. 183) is an
excellent example of this. Its interior, dating from the preceding
century, is well designed, but in no wise a remarkable composition,
following Italian models. The façade, added in 1755 by
<i>Servandoni</i>, is, on the other hand, one of the most striking
architectural objects in the city. It is a correct and well proportioned
classic composition in two stories&mdash;an Ionic arcade over a Doric
colonnade, surmounted by two lateral turrets. Other monuments of this
classic revival will be noticed in Chapter XXV.</p>


<span class="pagenum">324</span>
<a name="page324" id="page324"> </a>
<p><b>PUBLIC SQUARES.</b> Much attention was given to the embellishment
of open spaces in the cities, for which the classic style was admirably
suited. The most important work of this kind was that on the north side
of the Place de la Concorde, Paris. This splendid square, perhaps, on
the whole, the finest in Europe (though many of its best features belong
to a later date), was at this time adorned with the two monumental
colonnades by <i>Gabriel</i>. These colonnades, which form the
decorative fronts for blocks of houses, deserve praise for the beauty of
their proportions, as well as for the excellent treatment of the arcade
on which they rest, and of the pavilions at the ends.</p>


<p><b>IN GENERAL.</b> French Renaissance architecture is marked by good
proportions and harmonious and appropriate detail. Its most interesting
phase was unquestionably that of Francis&nbsp;I., so far, at least, as
concerns exterior design. It steadily progressed, however, in its
mastery of planning; and in its use of projecting pavilions crowned by
dominant masses of roof, it succeeded in preserving, even in severely
classic designs, a&nbsp;picturesqueness and variety otherwise
impossible. Roofs, dormers, chimneys, and staircases it treated with
especial success; and in these matters, as well as in monumental
dispositions of plan, the French have largely retained their
pre-eminence to our own day.</p>


<div class="monuments">

<p><b>MONUMENTS.</b> (Mainly supplementary to text. Ch. = château;
P.&nbsp;= palace; C.&nbsp;= cathedral; Chu. = church; H.&nbsp;= hôtel;
T.H. = town hall.)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Transition</span>: Blois, E. wing, 1499;
Ch. Meillant; Ch. Chaumont; T.H. Amboise, 1502&ndash;05.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Francis I.</span>: Ch. Nantouillet,
1517&ndash;25; Ch. Blois, W.&nbsp;wing (afterward demolished) and
N.&nbsp;wing, 1520&ndash;30; H.&nbsp;Lallemant, Bourges, 1520; Ch.
Villers-Cotterets, 1520&ndash;59; P.&nbsp;of Archbishop, Sens,
1521&ndash;35; P.&nbsp;Fontainebleau (Cour Ovale, Cour d’Adieux, Gallery
Francis&nbsp;I., 1527&ndash;34; Peristyle, Chapel St. Saturnin,
1540&ndash;47, by <i>Gilles le Breton</i>; Cour du Cheval Blanc,
1527&ndash;31, by <i>P.&nbsp;Chambiges</i>); H.&nbsp;Bernuy, Toulouse,
1528&ndash;39; P.&nbsp;Granvelle, Besançon, 1532&ndash;40; T.H. Niort,
T.H. Loches, 1532&ndash;43: H.&nbsp;de Ligeris (Carnavalet), Paris,
1544, by <i>P.&nbsp;Lescot</i>; churches of Gisors,
<span class="pagenum">325</span>
<a name="page325" id="page325"> </a>
nave and façade, 1530; La Dalbade, Toulouse, portal, 1530; St.
Symphorien Tours, 1531; Chu. Tillières, 1534&ndash;46.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Advanced Renaissance</span>: Fontaine des
Innocents, Paris, 1547&ndash;50, by <i>P.&nbsp;Lescot</i> and
<i>J.&nbsp;Goujon</i>; tomb Francis&nbsp;I., at St. Denis, 1555, by
<i>Ph. de l’Orme</i>; H.&nbsp;Catelan, Toulouse, 1555; tomb Henry II.,
at St. Denis, 1560; portal S.&nbsp;Michel, Dijon, 1564; Ch. Sully, 1567;
T.H. Arras, 1573; P.&nbsp;Fontainebleau (Cour du Cheval Blanc
remodelled, 1564&ndash;66, by <i>P.&nbsp;Girard</i>; Cour de la
Fontaine, same date); T.H. Besançon, 1582; Ch. Charleval, 1585, by,
<i>J.&nbsp;B. du Cerceau</i>.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Style of Henry IV.</span>:
P.&nbsp;Fontainebleau (Galerie des Cerfs, Chapel of the Trinity,
Baptistery, etc.); P.&nbsp;Tuileries (Pav. de Flore, by <i>du
Cerceau</i>, 1590&ndash;1610; long gallery continued); Hôtel Vogüé, at
Dijon, 1607; Place Dauphine, Paris, 1608; P.&nbsp;de Justice, Paris,
Great Hall, by <i>S.&nbsp;de Brosse</i>, 1618; H.&nbsp;Sully, Paris,
1624&ndash;39; P.&nbsp;Royal, Paris, by <i>J.&nbsp;Lemercier</i>, for
Cardinal Richelieu, 1627&ndash;39; P.&nbsp;Louvre doubled in size, by
the same; P.&nbsp;Tuileries (N.&nbsp;wing, and Pav. Marsan, long gallery
completed); H.&nbsp;Lambert, Paris; T.H. Reims, 1627; Ch. Blois,
W.&nbsp;wing for Gaston d’Orléans, by <i>F.&nbsp;Mansart</i>, 1635;
façade St. Étienne du Mont, Paris, 1610; of St. Gervais, Paris,
1616&ndash;21, by <i>S.&nbsp;de Brosse</i>.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Style of Louis XIV.</span>: T.H. Lyons,
1646; P.&nbsp;Louvre, E.&nbsp;colonnade and court completed,
1660&ndash;70; Tuileries altered by Le Vau, 1664; observatory at Paris,
1667&ndash;72; arch of St. Denis, Paris, 1672, by <i>Blondel</i>; Arch
of St. Martin, 1674, by <i>Bullet</i>; Banque de France, H.&nbsp;de
Luyne, H.&nbsp;Soubise, all in Paris; Ch. Chantilly; Ch. de Tanlay;
P.&nbsp;St. Cloud; Place des Victoires, 1685; Chu. St. Sulpice, Paris,
by <i>Le Vau</i> (façade, 1755); Chu. St. Roch, Paris, 1653, by
<i>Lemercier</i> and <i>de Cotte</i>; Notre Dame des Victoires, Paris,
1656, by <i>Le Muet</i> and <i>Bruant</i>.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">The Decline</span>: P.&nbsp;Bourbon, 1722;
T.H. Rouen; Halle aux Blés (recently demolished), 1748; École Militaire,
1752&ndash;58, by <i>Gabriel</i>; P.&nbsp;Louvre, court completed, 1754,
by the same; Madeleine begun, 1764; H.&nbsp;des Monnaies (Mint), by
<i>Antoine</i>; École de Médecine, 1774, by <i>Gondouin</i>;
P.&nbsp;Royal, Great Court, 1784, by <i>Louis</i>; Théâtre Français,
1784 (all the above at Paris); Grand Théâtre, Bordeaux, 1785&ndash;1800,
by <i>Louis</i>; Préfecture at Bordeaux, by the same; Ch. de Compiegne,
1770, by <i>Gabriel</i>; P.&nbsp;Versailles, theatre by the same;
H.&nbsp;Montmorency, Soubise, de Varennes, and the Petit Luxembourg, all
at Paris, by <i>de Cotte</i>; public squares at Nancy, Bordeaux,
Valenciennes, Rennes, Reims.</p>

</div>




<span class="pagenum">326</span>
<a name="page326" id="page326"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXXIII" id="chapXXIII">CHAPTER XXIII.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
RENAISSANCE ARCHITECTURE IN GREAT BRITAIN AND THE NETHERLANDS.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before,
Fergusson, Palustre. Also, Belcher and Macartney, <i>Later Renaissance
Architecture in England</i>. Billings, <i>Baronial and Ecclesiastical
Antiquities of Scotland</i>. Blomfield, <i>A&nbsp;Short History of
Renaissance Architecture in England</i>. Britton, <i>Architectural
Antiquities of Great Britain</i>. Ewerbeck, <i>Die Renaissance in
Belgien und Holland</i>. Galland, <i>Geschichte der Hollandischen
Baukunst im Zeitalter der Renaissance</i>. Gotch and Brown,
<i>Architecture of the Renaissance in England</i>. Loftie, <i>Inigo
Jones and Wren</i>. Nash, <i>Mansions of England</i>. Papworth,
<i>Renaissance and Italian Styles of Architecture in Great Britain</i>.
Richardson, <i>Architectural Remains of the Reigns of Elizabeth and
James&nbsp;I.</i> Schayes, <i>Histoire de l’architecture en
Belgique</i>.</p>


<p><b>THE TRANSITION.</b> The architectural activity of the sixteenth
century in England was chiefly devoted to the erection of vast country
mansions for the nobility and wealthy <i>bourgeoisie</i>. In these
seignorial residences a degenerate form of the Gothic, known as the
Tudor style, was employed during the reigns of Henry VII. and Henry
VIII., and they still retained much of the feudal aspect of the Middle
Ages. This style, with its broad, square windows and ample halls, was
well suited to domestic architecture, as well as to collegiate
buildings, of which a considerable number were erected at this time.
Among the more important palaces and manor-houses of this period are the
earlier parts of Hampton Court, Haddon and Hengreave Halls, and the now
ruined castles of Raglan and Wolterton.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig184" id="fig184"> </a>
<img src="images/fig184.jpg" width="405" height="300"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 184.&mdash;BURGHLEY HOUSE.</p>

<p><b>ELIZABETHAN STYLE.</b> Under Elizabeth (1558&ndash;1603) the
progress of classic culture and the employment of Dutch
<span class="pagenum">327</span>
<a name="page327" id="page327"> </a>
and Italian artists led to a gradual introduction of Renaissance forms,
which, as in France, were at first mingled with others of Gothic origin.
Among the foreign artists in England were the versatile Holbein, Trevigi
and Torregiano from Italy, and Theodore Have, Bernard Jansen, and Gerard
Chrismas from Holland. The pointed arch disappeared, and the orders
began to be used as subordinate features in the decoration of doors,
windows, chimneys, and mantels. Open-work balustrades replaced
externally the heavy Tudor battlements, and a peculiar style of carving
in flat relief-patterns, resembling <i>appliqué</i> designs cut out with
the jigsaw and attached by nails or rivets, was applied with little
judgment to all possible features. Ceilings were commonly finished in
plaster, with elaborate interlacing patterns in low relief; and this,
with the increasing use of interior woodwork, gave to the mansions of
this time a more homelike but less monumental aspect internally. English
<span class="pagenum">328</span>
<a name="page328" id="page328"> </a>
architects, like Smithson and Thorpe, now began to win the patronage at
first monopolized by foreigners. In <b>Wollaton Hall</b> (1580), by
Smithson, the orders were used for the main composition with mullioned
windows, much after the fashion of <b>Longleat House</b>, completed a
year earlier by his master, John of Padua. During the following period,
however (1590&ndash;1610), there was a reaction toward the Tudor
practice, and the orders were again relegated to subordinate uses. Of
their more monumental employment, the <b>Gate of Honor</b> of Caius
College, Cambridge, is one of the earliest examples. Hardwicke and
Charlton Halls, and Burghley, Hatfield, and Holland Houses (Fig. 184),
are noteworthy monuments of the style.</p>


<p><b>JACOBEAN STYLE.</b> During the reign of James&nbsp;I.
(1603&ndash;25), details of classic origin came into more general use,
but caricatured almost beyond recognition. The orders, though much
employed, were treated without correctness or grace, and the ornament
was unmeaning and heavy. It is not worth while to dwell further upon
this style, which produced no important public buildings, and soon gave
way to a more rigid classicism.</p>


<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig185" id="fig185"> </a>
<img src="images/fig185.jpg" width="259" height="286"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 185.&mdash;BANQUETING HALL, WHITEHALL.</p>

<p><b>CLASSIC PERIOD.</b> If the classic style was late in its
appearance in England, its final sway was complete and long-lasting. It
was <i>Inigo Jones</i> (1572&ndash;1652) who first introduced the
correct and monumental style of the Italian masters of classic design.
For Palladio, indeed, he seems to have entertained a sort of veneration,
and the villa which he designed at Chiswick was a reduced copy of
Palladio’s Villa Capra, near Vicenza. This and other works of his show a
failure to appreciate the unsuitability of Italian conceptions to the
climate and tastes of Great Britain; his efforts to popularize Palladian
architecture, without the resources which Palladio controlled in the way
of decorative sculpture and painting, were consequently not always happy
in their results. His greatest work was the design
<span class="pagenum">329</span>
<a name="page329" id="page329"> </a>
for a new <b>Palace at Whitehall</b>, London. Of this colossal scheme,
which, if completed, would have ranked as the grandest palace of the
time, only the <b>Banqueting Hall</b> (now used as a museum) was ever
built (Fig. 185). It is an effective composition in two stories,
rusticated throughout and adorned with columns and pilasters, and
contains a fine vaulted hall in three aisles. The plan of the palace,
which was to have measured 1,152 × 720 feet, was excellent, largely
conceived and carefully studied in its details, but it was wholly beyond
the resources of the kingdom. The garden-front of <b>Somerset House</b>
(1632; demolished) had the same qualities of simplicity and dignity,
recalling the works of Sammichele. Wilton House, Coleshill, the Villa at
Chiswick, and St. Paul’s, Covent Garden, are the best known of his
works, showing him to have been a designer of ability, but hardly of the
consummate genius which his admirers attribute to him.</p>


<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig186" id="fig186"> </a>
<img src="images/fig186.png" width="153" height="278"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 186.&mdash;PLAN OF ST. PAUL’S, LONDON.</p>

<p><b>ST. PAUL’S CATHEDRAL.</b> The greatest of Jones’s successors was
<i>Sir Christopher Wren</i> (1632&ndash;1723), principally known as the
architect of <b>St. Paul’s Cathedral</b>, London, built to replace the
earlier Gothic cathedral destroyed in the great fire of 1666. It was
begun in 1675, and its designer had the rare good fortune to witness its
completion in 1710. The plan, as finally adopted, retained the general
<span class="pagenum">330</span>
<a name="page330" id="page330"> </a>
proportions of an English Gothic church, measuring 480 feet in length,
with transepts 250 feet long, and a grand rotunda 108 feet in diameter
at the crossing (Fig. 186). The style was strictly Italian, treated with
sobriety and dignity, if somewhat lacking in variety and inspiration.
Externally two stories of the Corinthian order appear, the upper story
being merely a screen to hide the clearstory and its buttresses. This is
an architectural deception, not atoned for by any special beauty of
detail. The dominant feature of the design is the dome over the central
area. It consists of an inner shell, reaching a height of 216 feet,
above which rises the exterior dome of wood, surmounted by a stone
lantern, the summit of which is 360 feet from the pavement (Fig. 187).
This exterior dome, springing from a high drum surrounded by a
magnificent peristyle, gives to the otherwise commonplace exterior of
the cathedral a signal majesty of effect. Next to the dome the most
successful part of the design is the west front, with its two-storied
porch and flanking bell-turrets. Internally the excessive relative
length, especially that of the choir, detracts from the effect of the
dome, and the poverty of detail gives the whole a somewhat bare aspect.
It is intended to relieve this ultimately by a systematic use of mosaic
decoration, especially in the dome. The central area itself, in spite of
the awkward treatment of the four smaller arches of the eight which
support the dome, is a noble design, occupying the whole width of the
three aisles, like the Octagon at Ely, and producing a striking effect
of amplitude
<span class="pagenum">331</span>
<a name="page331" id="page331"> </a>
and grandeur. The dome above it is constructively interesting from the
employment of a cone of brick masonry to support the stone lantern which
rises above the exterior wooden shell. The lower part of the cone forms
the drum of the inner dome, its contraction upward being intended to
produce a perspective illusion of increased height.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig187" id="fig187"> </a>
<img src="images/fig187.jpg" width="430" height="323"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 187.<!-- invisible . -->&mdash;EXTERIOR OF ST. PAUL’S
CATHEDRAL.</p>

<p>St. Paul’s ranks among the five <ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘of’">or</ins> six greatest domical buildings of Europe, and
is the most imposing modern edifice in England.</p>


<p><b>WREN’S OTHER WORKS.</b> Wren was conspicuously successful in the
designing of parish churches in London. <b>St. Stephen’s</b>, Walbrook,
is the most admired of these, with a dome resting on eight columns. Wren
may be called the inventor of the English Renaissance type of steeple,
in which a conical or pyramidal spire is harmoniously added
<span class="pagenum">332</span>
<a name="page332" id="page332"> </a>
to a belfry on a square tower with classic details. The steeple of
<b>Bow Church</b>, Cheapside, is the most successful example of the
type. In secular architecture Wren’s most important works were the plan
for rebuilding London after the Great Fire; the new courtyard of Hampton
Court, a&nbsp;quiet and dignified composition in brick and stone; the
pavilions and colonnade of <b>Greenwich Hospital</b>; the Sheldonian
Theatre at Oxford, and the Trinity College Library at Cambridge. Without
profound originality, these works testify to the sound good taste and
intelligence of their designer.</p>


<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig188" id="fig188"> </a>
<img src="images/fig188.png" width="245" height="170"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 188.&mdash;PLAN OF BLENHEIM.<!-- invisible . --><br>
<a class="closeup" href="images/fig188_large.png" target="_blank">
Larger View</a></p>

<p><b>THE 18TH CENTURY.</b> The Anglo-Italian style as used by Jones and
Wren continued in use through the eighteenth century, during the first
half of which a number of important country-seats and some churches were
erected. <i>Van Brugh</i> (1666&ndash;1726), <i>Hawksmoor</i>
(1666&ndash;1736), and <i>Gibbs</i> (1683&ndash;1751) were then the
leading architects. Van Brugh was especially skilful in his dispositions
of plan and mass, and produced in the designs of Blenheim and Castle
Howard effects of grandeur and variety of perspective hardly equalled by
any of his contemporaries in France or Italy. <b>Blenheim</b>, with its
monumental plan and the sweeping curves of its front (Fig. 188), has an
unusually palatial aspect, though the striving for picturesqueness is
carried too far. Castle Howard is simpler, depending largely for effect
on a somewhat inappropriate dome. To Hawksmoor, his pupil, are due
<b>St. Mary’s, Woolnoth</b> (1715), at London, in which by a bold
rustication of the whole exterior and by windows set in
<span class="pagenum">333</span>
<a name="page333" id="page333"> </a>
large recessed arches he was enabled to dispense wholly with the orders;
St. George’s, Bloomsbury; the new quadrangle of All Souls at Oxford, and
some minor works. The two most noted designs of James Gibbs are <b>St.
Martin’s-in-the-Fields</b>, at London (1726), and the <b>Radcliffe
Library</b>, at Oxford (1747). In the former the use of a Corinthian
portico&mdash;a&nbsp;practically uncalled-for but decorative
appendage&mdash;and of a steeple mounted on the roof, with no visible
lines of support from the ground, are open to criticism. But the
excellence of the proportions, and the dignity and appropriateness of
the composition, both internally and externally, go far to redeem these
defects (Fig. 189). The Radcliffe Library is a circular domical hall
surrounded by a lower circuit of alcoves and rooms, the whole treated
with straightforward simplicity and excellent proportions. Colin
Campbell, Flitcroft, Kent and Wood, contemporaries of Gibbs, may be
dismissed with passing mention.</p>

<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig189" id="fig189"> </a>
<img src="images/fig189.jpg" width="225" height="382"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 189.&mdash;ST. MARTIN’S-IN-THE-FIELDS, LONDON.<!-- invisible .
--></p>

<p><i>Sir William Chambers</i> (1726&ndash;96) was the greatest of the
later 18th-century architects. His fame rests chiefly on his <i>Treatise
on Civil Architecture</i>, and the extension and remodelling of
<b>Somerset House</b>, in which he retained the general
<i>ordonnance</i> of Inigo Jones’s design, adapting it to a
<span class="pagenum">334</span>
<a name="page334" id="page334"> </a>
frontage of some 600 feet. <i>Robert <ins class="correction" title="consistent error for ‘Adam’">Adams</ins></i>, the designer of
Keddlestone Hall, <i>Robert Taylor</i> (1714&ndash;88), the architect of
the Bank of England, and <i>George Dance</i>, who designed the Mansion
House and Newgate Prison, at London&mdash;the latter a vigorous and
appropriate composition without the orders&mdash;close the list of noted
architects of the eighteenth century. It was a period singularly wanting
in artistic creativeness and spontaneity; its productions were nearly
all dull and respectable, or at best dignified, but without charm.</p>


<p><b>BELGIUM.</b> As in all other countries where the late Gothic style
had been highly developed, Belgium was slow to accept the principles of
the Renaissance in art. Long after the dawn of the sixteenth century the
Flemish architects continued to employ their highly florid Gothic alike
for churches and town-halls, with which they chiefly had to do. The
earliest Renaissance buildings date from 1530&ndash;40, among them being
the Hôtel du Saumon, at Malines, at Bruges the Ancien Greffe, by <i>Jean
Wallot</i>, and at Liège the <b>Archbishop’s Palace</b>, by
<i>Borset</i>. The last named, in the singular and capricious form of
the arches and baluster-like columns of its court, reveals the taste of
the age for what was <i>outré</i> and odd; a&nbsp;taste partly due, no
doubt, to Spanish influences, as Belgium was in reality from 1506 to
1712 a Spanish province, and there was more or less interchange of
artists between the two countries. The <b>Hôtel de Ville</b>, at
Antwerp, by <i>Cornelius de Vriendt</i> or <i>Floris</i>
(1518&ndash;75), erected in 1565, is the most important monument of the
Renaissance in Belgium. Its façade, 305 feet long and 102 feet high, in
four stories, is an impressive creation in spite of its somewhat
monotonous fenestration and the inartistic repetition in the third story
of the composition and proportions of the second. The basement story
forms an open arcade, and an open colonnade or loggia runs along under
the roof, thus imparting to the composition a considerable play of light
and shade, enhanced by the picturesque
<span class="pagenum">335</span>
<a name="page335" id="page335"> </a>
central pavilion which rises to a height of six stories in diminishing
stages. The style is almost Palladian in its severity, but in general
the Flemish architects disdained the restrictions of classic canons,
preferring a more florid and fanciful effect than could be obtained by
mere combinations of Roman columns, arches, and entablatures. De
Vriendt’s other works were mostly designs for altars, tabernacles and
the like; among them the rood screen in Tournay Cathedral. His influence
may be traced in the Hôtel<!-- invisible accent --> de Ville at Flushing
(1594).</p>

<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig190" id="fig190"> </a>
<img src="images/fig190.jpg" width="230" height="312"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 190.&mdash;RENAISSANCE HOUSES, BRUSSELS.</p>

<p>The ecclesiastical architecture of the Flemish Renaissance is almost
as destitute of important monuments as is the secular. <b>Ste. Anne</b>,
at Bruges, fairly illustrates the type, which is characterized in
general by heaviness of detail and a cold and bare aspect internally.
The Renaissance in Belgium is best exemplified, after all, by minor
works and ordinary dwellings, many of which have considerable artistic
grace, though they are quaint rather than monumental (Fig. 190). Stepped
gables, high dormers, and volutes flanking each diminishing stage of the
design, give a certain piquancy to the street architecture of the
period.</p>


<p><b>HOLLAND.</b> Except in the domain of realistic painting, the Dutch
have never manifested pre-eminent artistic endowments, and the
Renaissance produced in Holland few monuments of consequence. It began
there, as in many
<span class="pagenum">336</span>
<a name="page336" id="page336"> </a>
other places, with minor works in the churches, due largely to Flemish
or Italian artists. About the middle of the 16th century two native
architects, <i>Sebastian van Noye</i> and <i>William van Noort</i>,
first popularized the use of carved pilasters and of gables or steep
pediments adorned with carved scallop-shells, in remote imitation of the
style of Francis&nbsp;I. The principal monuments of the age were
town-halls, and, after the war of independence in which the yoke of
Spain was finally broken (1566&ndash;79), local administrative
buildings&mdash;mints, exchanges and the like. The <b>Town Hall</b> of
<b>The Hague</b> (1565), with its stepped gable or great dormer, its
consoles, statues, and octagonal turrets, may be said to have
inaugurated the style generally followed after the war. Owing to the
lack of stone, brick was almost universally employed, and stone imported
by sea was only used in edifices of exceptional cost and importance. Of
these the <b>Town Hall</b> at Amsterdam holds the first place. Its
façade is of about the same dimensions as the one at Antwerp, but
compares unfavorably with it in its monotony and want of interest. The
<b>Leyden Town Hall</b>, by the Fleming, <i>Lieven de Key</i> (1597),
the Bourse or Exchange and the Hanse House at Amsterdam, by <i>Hendrik
de Keyser</i>, are also worthy of mention, though many lesser buildings,
built of brick combined with enamelled terra-cotta and stone, possess
quite as much artistic merit.</p>


<p><b>DENMARK.</b> In Denmark the monuments of the Renaissance may
almost be said to be confined to the reign of Christian IV.
(1588&ndash;1648), and do not include a single church of any importance.
The royal castles of the <b>Rosenborg</b> at Copenhagen (1610) and the
<b>Fredericksborg</b> (1580&ndash;1624), the latter by a Dutch
architect, are interesting and picturesque in mass, with their fanciful
gables, mullioned windows and numerous turrets, but can hardly lay claim
to beauty of detail or purity of style. The Exchange at Copenhagen,
built of brick and stone in the same general
<span class="pagenum">337</span>
<a name="page337" id="page337"> </a>
style (1619&ndash;40), is still less interesting both in mass and
detail.</p>

<p>The only other important Scandinavian monument deserving of special
mention in so brief a sketch as this is the <b>Royal Palace</b> at
<b>Stockholm</b>, Sweden (1698&ndash;1753), due to a foreign architect,
<i>Nicodemus de Tessin</i>. It is of imposing dimensions, and although
simple in external treatment, it merits praise for the excellent
disposition of its plan, its noble court, imposing entrances, and the
general dignity and appropriateness of its architecture.</p>


<div class="monuments">
<p><b>MONUMENTS</b> (in addition to those mentioned in text). <span
class="smallcaps">England, Tudor Style</span>: Several palaces by
Henry VIII., no longer extant; Westwood, later rebuilt; Gosfield Hall;
Harlaxton.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Elizabethan</span>:
Buckhurst, 1565; Kirby House, 1570, both by Thorpe; Caius College,
1570&ndash;75, by Theodore Have; “The Schools,” Oxford, by Thomas Holt,
1600; Beaupré Castle, 1600.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Jacobean</span>: Tombs of Mary of Scotland and of Elizabeth
in Westminster Abbey; Audsley Inn; Bolsover Castle, 1613; Heriot’s
Hospital, Edinburgh, 1628.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Classic</span> or <span class="smallcaps">Anglo-Italian</span>: St. John’s College, Oxford; Queen’s
House, Greenwich; Coleshill; all by Inigo Jones, 1620&ndash;51;
Amesbury, by Webb; Combe Abbey; Buckingham and Montague Houses; The
Monument, London, 1670, by Wren; Temple Bar, by the same; Winchester
Palace, 1683; Chelsea College; Towers of Westminster Abbey, 1696; St.
Clement Dane’s; St. James’s, Westminster; St. Peter’s, Cornhill, and
many others, all by Wren.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">18th
Century</span>: Seaton Delaval and Grimsthorpe, by Van Brugh; Wanstead
House, by Colin Campbell; Treasury Buildings, by Kent.</p>

<p>The most important Renaissance buildings of <span class="smallcaps">Belgium</span> and <span class="smallcaps">Holland</span>
have been mentioned in the text.</p>
</div>




<span class="pagenum">338</span>
<a name="page338" id="page338"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXXIV" id="chapXXIV">CHAPTER XXIV.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
RENAISSANCE ARCHITECTURE IN GERMANY, SPAIN, AND PORTUGAL.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before,
Fergusson, Palustre Also, von Bezold, <i>Die Baukunst der Renaissance in
Deutschland, Holland, Belgien und Dänemark</i> <!-- invisible umlaut -->
(in <i>Hdbuch. d. Arch.</i>). Caveda (tr. Kugler), <i>Geschichte der
Baukunst in Spanien</i>. Fritsch, <i>Denkmäler der deutschen
Renaissance</i> (plates). Junghändel, <i>Die Baukunst Spaniens</i>.
Lambert und Stahl, <i>Motive der deutschen Architektur</i>. Lübke,
<i>Geschichte der Renaissance in Deutschland</i>. Prentice,
<i>Renaissance Architecture and Ornament in Spain</i>. Uhde,
<i>Baudenkmäler in Spanien</i>. Verdier et Cattois, <i>Architecture
civile et domestique</i>. Villa Amil, <i>Hispania Artistica y
Monumental</i>.</p>


<p><b>AUSTRIA</b>; <b>BOHEMIA</b>. The earliest appearance of the
Renaissance in the architecture of the German states was in the eastern
provinces. Before the close of the fifteenth century Florentine and
Milanese architects were employed in Austria, Bohemia, and the Tyrol,
where there are a number of palaces and chapels in an unmixed Italian
style. The portal of the castle of Mahrisch-Trübau dates from 1492;
while to the early years of the 16th century belong a cruciform chapel
at Gran, the remodelling of the castle at Cracow, and the chapel of the
Jagellons in the same city&mdash;the earliest domical structure of the
German Renaissance, though of Italian design. The <b>Schloss Porzia</b>
(1510), at Spital in Carinthia, is a fine quadrangular palace,
surrounding a court with arcades on three sides, in which the open
stairs form a picturesque interruption with their rampant arches. But
for the massiveness of the details it might be a Florentine palace. In
addition to this, the famous <b>Arsenal</b> at Wiener-Neustadt (1524),
the portal of the Imperial
<span class="pagenum">339</span>
<a name="page339" id="page339"> </a>
Palace (1552), and the <b>Castle Schalaburg</b> on the Danube
(1530&ndash;1601), are attributed to Italian architects, to whom must
also be ascribed a number of important works at Prague. Chief among
these the <b>Belvedere</b> (1536, by <i>Paolo della Stella</i>),
a&nbsp;rectangular building surrounded by a graceful open arcade, above
which it rises with a second story crowned by a curved roof; the
Waldstein Palace (1621&ndash;29), by <i>Giov. Marini</i>, with its
imposing loggia; <b>Schloss Stern</b>, built on the plan of a
six-pointed star (1459&ndash;1565) and embellished by Italian artists
with stucco ornaments and frescoes; and parts of the palace on the
Hradschin, by <i>Scamozzi</i>, attest the supremacy of Italian art in
Bohemia. The same is true of Styria, Carinthia, and the Tyrol;
<i>e.g.</i> <b>Schloss Ambras</b> at Innsbrück (1570).</p>


<p><b>GERMANY: PERIODS.</b> The earliest manifestation of the
Renaissance in what is now the German Empire, appeared in the works of
painters like Dürer and Burkmair, and in occasional buildings previous
to 1525. The real transformation of German architecture, however, hardly
began until after the Peace of Augsburg, in 1555. From that time on its
progress was rapid, its achievements being almost wholly in the domain
of secular architecture&mdash;princely and ducal castles, town halls or
<i>Rathhäuser</i>, <!-- invisible umlaut --> and houses of wealthy
burghers or corporations. It is somewhat singular that the German
emperors should not have undertaken the construction of a new imperial
residence on a worthy scale, the palaces of Munich and Berlin being
aggregations of buildings of various dates about a nucleus of mediæval
origin, and with no single portion to compare with the stately châteaux
of the French kings. Church architecture was neglected, owing to the
Reformation, which turned to its own uses the existing churches, while
the Roman Catholics were too impoverished to replace the edifices they
had lost.</p>

<p>The periods of the German Renaissance are less well
<span class="pagenum">340</span>
<a name="page340" id="page340"> </a>
marked than those of the French; but its successive developments follow
the same general progression, divided into three stages:</p>

<p>I. <span class="smallcaps">The Early Renaissance</span>,
1525&ndash;1600, in which the orders were infrequently used, mainly for
porches and for gable decoration. The conceptions and spirit of most
monuments were still strongly tinged with Gothic feeling.</p>

<p>II. <span class="smallcaps">The Late Renaissance</span>,
1600&ndash;1675, characterized by a dry, heavy treatment, in which too
often neither the fanciful gayety of the previous period nor the simple
and monumental dignity of classic design appears. Broken curves, large
scrolls, obelisks, and a style of flat relief carving resembling the
Elizabethan are common. Occasional monuments exhibit a more correct and
classic treatment after Italian models.</p>

<p>III. <span class="smallcaps">The Decline or Baroque Period</span>,
1675&ndash;1800, employing the orders in a style of composition
oscillating between the extremes of bareness and of Rococo
over-decoration. The ornament partakes of the character of the Louis XV.
and Italian Jesuit styles, being most successful in interior decoration,
but externally running to the extreme of unrestrained fancy.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig191" id="fig191"> </a>
<img src="images/fig191.jpg" width="259" height="453"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 191.&mdash;SCHLOSS HÄMELSCHENBURG.<!-- invisible umlaut --></p>

<p><b>CHARACTERISTICS.</b> In none of these periods do we meet with the
sober, monumental treatment of the Florentine or Roman schools.
A&nbsp;love of picturesque variety in masses and sky-lines, inherited
from mediæval times, appears in the high roofs, stepped gables and lofty
dormers which are universal. The roofs often comprise several stories,
and are lighted by lofty gables at either end, and by dormers carried up
from the side walls through two or three stories. Gables and dormers
alike are built in diminishing stages, each step adorned with a console
or scroll, and the whole treated with pilasters or colonnettes and
entablatures breaking over each support (Fig. 191). These roofs,
dormers, and gables contribute the most noticeable element to the
general
<span class="pagenum">341</span>
<a name="page341" id="page341"> </a>
effect of most German Renaissance buildings, and are commonly the
best-designed features in them. The orders are scantily used and usually
treated with utter disregard of classic canons, being generally far too
massive and overloaded with ornament. Oriels, bay-windows, and turrets,
starting from corbels or colonnettes, or rarely from the ground,
diversify the façade, and spires of curious bulbous patterns give added
piquancy to the picturesque sky-line. The plans seldom had the
monumental symmetry and largeness of Italian and French models;
courtyards were often irregular in shape and diversified with balconies
and spiral staircase-turrets. The national leaning was always toward the
quaint and fantastic, as well in the decoration as in the composition.
Grotesques, caryatids, <i>gaînes</i> (half-figures terminating below in
sheath-like supports), fanciful rustication, and many other details give
a touch of the Baroque even to works of early date. The same principles
were applied with better success to interior decoration, especially in
the large halls of
<span class="pagenum">342</span>
<a name="page342" id="page342"> </a>
the castles and town-halls, and many of their ceilings were sumptuous
and well-considered designs, deeply panelled, painted and gilded in wood
or plaster.</p>


<p><b>CASTLES.</b> The <i>Schloss</i> or <i>Burg</i> of the German
prince or duke retained throughout the Renaissance many mediæval
characteristics in plan and aspect. A&nbsp;large proportion of these
noble residences were built upon foundations of demolished feudal
castles, reproducing in a new dress the ancient round towers and vaulted
guard-rooms and halls, as in the Hartenfels at Torgau, the Heldburg
(both in Saxony), and the castle of Trausnitz, in Bavaria, among many
others. The <b>Castle</b> at <b>Torgau</b> (1540) is one of the most
imposing of its class, with massive round and square towers showing
externally, and court façades full of picturesque irregularities. In the
great <b>Castle</b> at <b>Dresden</b> the plan is more symmetrical, and
the Renaissance appears more distinctly in the details of the
Georgenflügel (1530&ndash;50), though at that early date the classic
orders were almost ignored. The portal of the Heldburg, however, built
in 1562, is a composition quite in the contemporary French vein, with
superposed orders and a crowning pediment over a massive basement.</p>

<p>Another important series of castles or palaces are of more regular
design, in which the feudal traditions tend to disappear. The majority
belong to the end of the 16th and beginning of the 17th centuries. They
are built around large rectangular courts with arcades in two or three
stories on one or more sides, but rarely surrounding it entirely. In
these the segmental arch is more common than the semicircular, and
springs usually from short and stumpy Ionic or Corinthian columns. The
rooms and halls are arranged <i>en suite</i>, without corridors, and a
large and lofty banquet hall forms the dominant feature of the series.
The earliest of these regularly planned palaces are of Italian design.
Chief among them is the <b>Residenz</b> at <b>Landshut</b>
(1536&ndash;43),
<span class="pagenum">343</span>
<a name="page343" id="page343"> </a>
with a thoroughly Roman plan, by pupils of Giulio Romano, and exterior
and court façades of great dignity treated with the orders. More German
in its details, but equally interesting, is the <b>Fürstenhof</b> <!--
missing umlaut --> at <b>Wismar</b>, in brick and terra-cotta, by
<i>Valentino di Lira</i> and <i>Van Aken</i> (1553); while in the
<b>Piastenschloss</b> at Brieg (1547&ndash;72), by Italian architects,
the treatment in parts suggests the richest works of the style of
Francis&nbsp;I. In other castles the segmental arch and stumpy columns
or piers show the German taste, as in the <b>Plassenburg</b>, by
<i>Kaspar Vischer</i> (1554&ndash;64), the castle at Plagnitz, and the
<b>Old Castle</b> at <b>Stuttgart</b>, all dating from about
1550&ndash;55. <b>Heidelberg Castle</b>, in spite of its mediæval aspect
from the river and its irregular plan, ranks as the highest achievement
of the German Renaissance in palace design. The most interesting parts
among its various wings built at different dates&mdash;the earlier
portions still Gothic in design&mdash;are the <b>Otto Heinrichsbau</b>
(1554) and the <b>Friedrichsbau</b> (1601). The first of these appears
somewhat simpler in its lines than the second, by reason of having lost
its original dormer-gables. The orders, freely treated, are superposed
in three stories, and twin windows, niches, statues, <i>gaînes</i>,
medallions and profuse carving produce an effect of great gayety and
richness. The Friedrichsbau (Fig. 192), less quiet in its lines, and
with high scroll-gabled and stepped dormers, is on the other hand more
soberly decorated and more characteristically German. The Schloss
Hämelschenburg (<a href="#fig191">Fig.&nbsp;191</a>) is designed in
somewhat the same spirit, but with even greater simplicity of
detail.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig192" id="fig192"> </a>
<img src="images/fig192.jpg" width="247" height="457"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 192.&mdash;THE FRIEDRICHSBAU, HEIDELBERG.</p>

<p><b>TOWN HALLS.</b> These constitute the most interesting class of
Renaissance buildings in Germany, presenting a considerable variety of
types, but nearly all built in solid blocks without courts, and adorned
with towers or spires. A&nbsp;high roof crowns the building, broken by
one or more high gables or many-storied dormers. The majority of these
town
<span class="pagenum">344</span>
<a name="page344" id="page344"> </a>
halls present façades much diversified by projecting wings, as at Lemgo
and Paderborn, or by oriels and turrets, as at <b>Altenburg</b>
(1562&ndash;64); and the towers which dominate the whole terminate
usually in bell-shaped cupolas, or in more capricious forms with
successive swellings and contractions, as at Dantzic (1587). A&nbsp;few,
however, are designed with monumental simplicity of mass; of these that
at <b>Bremen</b> (1612) is perhaps the finest, with its beautiful
exterior arcade on strong Doric columns. The town hall of Nuremberg is
one of the few with a court, and presents a façade of almost Roman
simplicity (1613&ndash;19); that at <b>Augsburg</b> (1615) is equally
classic and more pleasing; while at Schweinfurt, Rothenburg (1572),
Mülhausen, etc., are others worthy of mention.</p>


<p><b>CHURCHES.</b> <b>St. Michael’s</b>, at Munich, is almost the only
important church of the first period in Germany (1582), but it is worthy
to rank with many of the most notable contemporary Italian churches.
A&nbsp;wide nave covered by a majestic barrel vault, is flanked by side
chapels, separated from each other by massive piers and
<span class="pagenum">345</span>
<a name="page345" id="page345"> </a>
forming a series of gallery bays above. There are short transepts and a
choir, all in excellent proportion and treated with details which, if
somewhat heavy, are appropriate and reasonably correct. The
<b>Marienkirche</b> at Wolfenbüttel <!-- missing umlaut --> (1608) is a
fair sample of the parish churches of the second period. In the exterior
of this church pointed arches and semi-Gothic tracery are curiously
associated with heavy rococo carving. The simple rectangular mass,
square tower, and portal with massive orders and carving are
characteristic features. Many of the church-towers are well proportioned
and graceful structures in spite of the fantastic outlines of their
spires. One of the best and purest in style is that of the University
Church at Würzburg (1587&ndash;1600).</p>


<p><b>HOUSES.</b> Many of the German houses of the sixteenth and
seventeenth centuries would merit extended notice in a larger work, as
among the most interesting lesser monuments of the Renaissance.
Nuremberg and Hildesheim are particularly rich in such houses, built
either for private citizens or for guilds and corporations. Not a few of
the half-timbered houses of the time are genuine works of art, though
interest chiefly centres in the more monumental
<span class="pagenum">346</span>
<a name="page346" id="page346"> </a>
dwellings of stone. In this domestic architecture the picturesque
quality of German design appears to better advantage than in more
monumental edifices, and their broadly stepped gables, corbelled oriels,
florid portals and want of formal symmetry imparting a peculiar and
undeniable charm. The Kaiserhaus and Wedekindsches Haus at Hildesheim;
<b>Fürstenhaus</b> at Leipzig; Peller, Hirschvogel, and Funk houses at
Nuremberg; the Salt House at Frankfurt, and Ritter House at Heidelberg,
are a few of the most noted among these examples of domestic
architecture.</p>


<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig193" id="fig193"> </a>
<img src="images/fig193.jpg" width="225" height="419"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 193.&mdash;ZWINGER PALACE, DRESDEN.</p>

<p><b>LATER MONUMENTS.</b> The <b>Zwinger Palace</b> at Dresden (Fig.
193), is the most elaborate and wayward example of the German palace
architecture of the third period. Its details are of the most
exaggerated rococo type, like confectioner’s work done in stone; and yet
the building has an air of princely splendor which partly atones for its
details. Besides this palace, Dresden possesses in the domical
<b>Marienkirche</b> (Fig. 194) a&nbsp;very meritorious example of late
design. The proportions are good, and the detail, if not interesting, is
at least inoffensive, while the whole is
<span class="pagenum">347</span>
<a name="page347" id="page347"> </a>
a&nbsp;dignified and rational piece of work. At Vienna are a number of
palaces of the third period, more interesting for their beautiful
grounds and parks than for intrinsic architectural merit. As in Italy,
this was the period of stucco, and although in Vienna this cheap and
perishable material was cleverly handled, and the ornament produced was
often quaint and effective, the results lack the permanence and dignity
of true building in stone or brick, and may be dismissed without further
mention.</p>

<p class="illustration floatleft w240">
<a name="fig194" id="fig194"> </a>
<img src="images/fig194.jpg" width="239" height="417"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 194.&mdash;CHURCH OF ST. MARY (MARIENKIRCHE), DRESDEN.</p>

<p>In minor works the Germans were far less prolific than the Italians
or Spaniards. Few of their tombs were of the first importance, though
one, the <b>Sebald Shrine</b>, in Nuremberg, by <i>Peter Vischer</i>
(1506&ndash;19), is a splendid work in bronze, in the transitional
style; a&nbsp;richly decorated canopy on slender metal colonnettes
covering and enclosing the sarcophagus of the saint. There are a large
number of fountains in the squares of German and Swiss cities which
display a high order of design, and are among the most characteristic
minor products of German art.</p>


<p><b>SPAIN.</b> The flamboyant Gothic style sufficed for a while to
meet the requirements of the arrogant and luxurious period which in
Spain followed the overthrow of the Moors and the discovery of America.
But it was inevitable that the Renaissance should in time make its
influence felt in the arts of the Iberian peninsula, largely through the
employment of Flemish artists. In jewelry and silverwork, arts which
received a great impulse from the importation of the precious metals
from the New World, the forms of the Renaissance found special
acceptance, so that the new style received the name of the
<i>Plateresque</i> (from <i>platero</i>, silversmith). This was a not
inept name for the minutely detailed and sumptuous decoration of the
early Renaissance, which lasted from 1500 to the accession of Philip II.
in 1556. It was characterized by surface-decoration spreading over broad
areas, especially around doors and windows,
<span class="pagenum">348</span>
<a name="page348" id="page348"> </a>
florid escutcheons and Gothic details mingling with delicately chiselled
arabesques. Decorative pilasters with broken entablatures and carved
baluster-shafts were employed with little reference to constructive
lines, but with great refinement of detail, in spite of the exuberant
profusion of the ornament.</p>

<p>To this style, after the artistic inaction of Philip II.’s reign,
succeeded the coldly classic style practised by <i>Berruguete</i> and
<i>Herrera</i>, and called the <i>Griego-Romano</i>. In spite of the
attempt to produce works of classical purity, the buildings of this
period are for the most part singularly devoid of originality and
interest. This style lasted until the middle of the seventeenth century,
and in the case of certain works and artists, until its close. It was
followed, at least in ecclesiastical architecture, by the so-called
<i>Churrigueresque</i>, a&nbsp;name derived from an otherwise
insignificant architect, <i>Churriguera</i>, who like Maderna and
Borromini in Italy, discarded all the proprieties of architecture, and
rejoiced in the wildest extravagances of an untrained fancy and debased
taste.</p>


<p><b>EARLY MONUMENTS.</b> The earliest ecclesiastical works of the
Renaissance period, like the cathedrals of Salamanca, Toledo, and
Segovia, were almost purely Gothic in style. Not until 1525 did the new
forms begin to dominate in cathedral design. The cathedral at
<b>Jaen</b>, by <i>Valdelvira</i> (1525), an imposing structure with
three aisles and side chapels, was treated internally with the
Corinthian order throughout. The Cathedral of <b>Granada</b> (1529, by
<i>Diego de Siloe</i>) is especially interesting for its great domical
sanctuary 70 feet in diameter, and for the largeness and dignity of its
conception and details. The cathedral of Malaga, the church of San
Domingo at Salamanca, and the monastery of San Girolamo in the same city
are either wholly or in part Plateresque, and provided with portals of
especial richness of decoration. Indeed, the portal of S.&nbsp;Domingo
practically forms the whole façade.</p>

<span class="pagenum">349</span>
<a name="page349" id="page349"> </a>
<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig195" id="fig195"> </a>
<img src="images/fig195.jpg" width="263" height="411"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 195.<!-- invisible . -->&mdash;DOOR OF THE UNIVERSITY,
SALAMANCA.</p>

<p>In secular architecture the <b>Hospital</b> of <b>Santa Cruz</b> at
Toledo, by <i>Enrique de Egaz</i> (1504&ndash;16), is one of the
earliest examples of the style. Here, as also in the <b>University</b>
at <b>Salamanca</b> (Fig. 195), the portal is the most notable feature,
suggesting both Italian and French models in its details. The great
<b>College</b> at <b>Alcala de Heñares</b> is another important early
monument of the Renaissance (1500&ndash;17, by <i>Pedro Gumiel</i>). In
most designs the preference was for long façades of moderate height,
with a basement showing few openings, and a <i>bel étage</i> lighted by
large windows widely spaced. Ornament was chiefly concentrated about the
doors and windows, except for the roof balustrades, which were often
exceedingly elaborate. Occasionally a decorative motive is spread over
the whole façade, as in the <b>Casa de las Conchas</b> at Salamanca,
adorned with cockle-shells carved at intervals all over the
front&mdash;a&nbsp;bold and effective device; or the Infantada palace
with its spangling of carved diamonds. The courtyard or <i>patio</i> was
an indispensable feature of these buildings, as in all hot countries,
and was surrounded
<span class="pagenum">350</span>
<a name="page350" id="page350"> </a>
by arcades frequently of the most fanciful design overloaded with minute
ornament, as in the <b>Infantado</b> at Guadalajara, the <b>Casa de
Zaporta</b>, formerly at Saragossa (now removed to Paris; Fig. 196), and
the Lupiana monastery. The patios in the <b>Archbishop’s Palace</b> at
Alcala de Heñares and the <b>Collegio de los Irlandeses</b> at Salamanca
are of simpler design; that of the <b>Casa de Pilatos</b> at Seville is
almost purely Moorish. Salamanca abounds in buildings of this
period.</p>

<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig196" id="fig196"> </a>
<img src="images/fig196.jpg" width="244" height="467"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 196.<!-- invisible . -->&mdash;CASA DE ZAPORTA: <!-- invisible :
--> COURTYARD.</p>


<p><b>THE GRIEGO-ROMANO.</b> The more classic treatment of architectural
designs by the use of the orders was introduced by <i>Alonzo
Berruguete</i> (1480&ndash;1560?), who studied in Italy after 1503. The
Archbishop’s Palace and the Doric <b>Gate</b> of <b>San Martino</b>,
both at Toledo, were his work, as well as the first palace at Madrid.
The Palladio of Spain was, however, by <i>Juan de Herrera</i> (died
1597), the architect of <b>Valladolid Cathedral</b>, built under
Philip&nbsp;V. This vast edifice follows the general lines of the
earlier cathedrals of Jaen and Granada, but in a style of classical
correctness almost
<span class="pagenum">351</span>
<a name="page351" id="page351"> </a>
severe in aspect, but well suited to the grand scale of the church. The
masterpiece of this period was the monastery of the <b>Escurial</b>,
begun by <i>Juan Battista</i> of Toledo, in 1563, but not completed
until nearly one hundred and fifty years later. Its final architectural
aspect was largely due to Herrera. It is a vast rectangle of 740 × 580
feet, comprising a complex of courts, halls, and cells, dominated by the
huge mass of the chapel. This last is an imposing domical church
covering 70,000 square feet, treated throughout with the Doric order,
and showing externally a lofty dome and campaniles with domical
lanterns, which serve to diversify the otherwise monotonous mass of the
monastery. What the Escurial lacks in grace or splendor is at least in a
measure redeemed by its majestic scale and varied sky-lines. The
<b>Palace of Charles&nbsp;V.</b> (Fig. 197), adjoining the Alhambra at
Granada, though begun as early as 1527 by <i>Machuca</i>, was mainly due
to Berruguete, and is an excellent example of the Spanish Palladian
style. With its circular court, admirable proportions and well-studied
details, this often maligned edifice deserves to be ranked among the
most successful examples of the style. During this period the cathedral
of Seville received many alterations, and the upper part of the
adjoining
<span class="pagenum">352</span>
<a name="page352" id="page352"> </a>
Moorish tower of the <b>Giralda</b>, burned in 1395, was rebuilt by
<i>Fernando Ruiz</i> in the prevalent style, and with considerable
elegance and appropriateness of design.</p>

<p class="illustration float w270">
<a name="fig197" id="fig197"> </a>
<img src="images/fig197.jpg" width="263" height="312"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 197.&mdash;PALACE OF CHARLES V., GRANADA.<!-- invisible last two .
--></p>

<p>Of the <b>Palace</b> at <b>Madrid</b>, rebuilt by Philip&nbsp;V.
after the burning of the earlier palace in 1734, and mainly the work of
an Italian, <i>Ivara</i>; the Aranjuez palace (1739, by <i>Francisco
Herrera</i>), and the Palace at <b>San Ildefonso</b>, it need only be
said that their chief merit lies in their size and the absence of those
glaring violations of good taste which generally characterized the
successors of Churriguera. In ecclesiastical design these violations of
taste were particularly abundant and excessive, especially in the
façades and in the sanctuary&mdash;huge aggregations of misplaced and
vulgar detail, with hardly an unbroken pediment, column, or arch in the
whole. Some extreme examples of this abominable style are to be found in
the Spanish-American churches of the 17th and 18th centuries, as at
Chihuahua (Mexico), Tucson (Arizona), and other places. The least
offensive features of the churches of this period were the towers,
usually in pairs at the west end, some of them showing excellent
proportions and good composition in spite of their execrable
details.</p>

<p>Minor architectural works, such as the rood screens in the churches
of Astorga and Medina de Rio Seco, and many tombs at Granada, Avila,
Alcala, etc., give evidence of superior skill in decorative design,
where constructive considerations did not limit the exercise of the
imagination.</p>


<p><b>PORTUGAL.</b> The Renaissance appears to have produced few notable
works in Portugal. Among the chief of these are the <b>Tower</b>, the
church, and the <b>Cloister</b>, at Belem. These display a riotous
profusion of minute carved ornament, with a free commingling of late
Gothic details, wearisome in the end in spite of the beauty of its
execution (1500&ndash;40?). The church of <b>Santa Cruz</b> at Coimbra,
and that of <b>Luz</b>, near Lisbon, are among the most noted of the
religious
<span class="pagenum">353</span>
<a name="page353" id="page353"> </a>
monuments of the Renaissance, while in secular architecture the royal
palace at <b>Mafra</b> is worthy of mention.</p>


<div class="monuments">
<p><b>MONUMENTS.</b> (Mainly supplementary to preceding text.) <span
class="smallcaps">Austria</span>, <span class="smallcaps">Bohemia</span>, etc.: At Prague, Schloss Stern,
1459&ndash;1565; Schwarzenburg Palace, 1544; Waldstein Palace, 1629;
Salvator Chapel, Vienna, 1515; Schloss Schalaburg, near Mölk,
1530&ndash;1601; Standehaus, Gratz, 1625. At Vienna: Imperial palace,
various dates; Schwarzenburg and Lichtenstein palaces, 18th century.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Germany</span>, <span class="smallcaps">First Period</span>: Schloss Baden, 1510&ndash;29 and part
1569&ndash;82; Schloss Merseburg, 1514, with late 16th-century portals;
Fuggerhaus at Augsburg, 1516; castles of Neuenstein, 1530&ndash;64;
Celle, 1532&ndash;46 (and enlarged, 1665&ndash;70); Dessau, 1533;
Leignitz, portal, 1533; Plagnitz, 1550; Schloss Gottesau, 1553&ndash;88;
castle of Güstrow, 1555&ndash;65; of Oels, 1559&ndash;1616; of Bernburg,
1565; of Heiligenburg, 1569&ndash;87; Münzhof at Munich, 1575; Lusthaus
(demolished) at Stuttgart, 1575; Wilhelmsburg Castle at Schmalkald,
1584&ndash;90; castle of Hämelschenburg, 1588&ndash;1612.&mdash;<span
class="smallcaps">Second Period</span>: Zunfthaus at Basle, 1578, in
advanced style; so also Juleum at Helmstädt, 1593&ndash;1612; gymnasium
at Brunswick, 1592&ndash;1613; Spiesshof at Basle, 1600; castle at
Berlin, 1600&ndash;1616, demolished in great part; castle Bevern, 1603;
Dantzic, Zeughaus, 1605; Wallfahrtskirche at Dettelbach, 1613; castle
Aschaffenburg, 1605&ndash;13; Schloss Weikersheim,
1600&ndash;83.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Third Period</span>:
Zeughaus at Berlin, 1695; palace at Berlin by Schlüter, 1699&ndash;1706;
Catholic church, Dresden. (For Classic Revival, see next
chapter.)&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">Town Halls</span>: At
Heilbronn, 1535; Görlitz, 1537; Posen, 1550; Mülhausen, 1552; Cologne,
porch with Corinthian columns and Gothic arches, 1569; Lübeck
(Rathhaushalle), 1570; Schweinfurt, 1570; Gotha, 1574; Emden,
1574&ndash;76; Lemgo, 1589; Neisse, 1604; Nordhausen, 1610; Paderborn,
1612&ndash;16; Gernsbach, 1617.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Spain</span>, <span class="smallcaps">16th Century</span>: Monastery San Marcos at Leon; palace of
the Infanta, Saragossa; Carcel del Corte at Baez; Cath. of Malaga,
W.&nbsp;front, 1538, by de Siloë; Tavera Hospital, Toledo, 1541, by de
Bustamente; Alcazar at Toledo, 1548; Lonja (Town Hall) at Saragossa,
1551; Casa de la Sal, Casa Monterey, and Collegio de los Irlandeses, all
at Salamanca; Town Hall, Casa de los Taveras and upper part of Giralda,
all at Seville.&mdash;<span class="smallcaps">17th Century</span>:
Cathedral del Pilar, Saragossa, 1677; Tower del Seo, 1685.&mdash;<span
class="smallcaps">18th Century</span>: palace at Madrid, 1735; at
Aranjuez, 1739; cathedral of Santiago, 1738; Lonja at Barcelona,
1772.</p>
</div>




<span class="pagenum">354</span>
<a name="page354" id="page354"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXXV" id="chapXXV">CHAPTER XXV.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
THE CLASSIC REVIVALS IN EUROPE.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before,
Fergusson. Also Chateau, <i>Histoire et caractères de l’architecture en
France</i>; and Lübke, <i>Geschichte der Architektur</i>. (For the most
part, however, recourse must be had to the general histories of
architecture, and to monographs on special cities or buildings.)</p>


<p><b>THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY.</b> By the end of the seventeenth century
the Renaissance, properly speaking, had run its course in Europe. The
increasing servility of its imitation of antique models had exhausted
its elasticity and originality. Taste rapidly declined before the growth
of the industrial and commercial spirit in the eighteenth century. The
ferment of democracy and the disquiet of far-reaching political changes
had begun to preoccupy the minds of men to the detriment of the arts. By
the middle of the eighteenth century, however, the extravagances of the
Rococo, Jesuit, and Louis XV. styles had begun to pall upon the popular
taste. The creative spirit was dead, and nothing seemed more promising
as a corrective for these extravagances than a return to classic models.
But the demand was for a literal copying of the arcades and porticos of
Rome, to serve as frontispieces for buildings in which modern
requirements should be accommodated to these antique exteriors, instead
of controlling the design. The result was a manifest gain in the
splendor of the streets and squares adorned by these highly decorative
frontispieces, but at the expense of convenience
<span class="pagenum">355</span>
<a name="page355" id="page355"> </a>
and propriety in the buildings themselves. While this academic spirit
too often sacrificed logic and originality to an arbitrary symmetry and
to the supposed canons of Roman design, it also, on the other hand, led
to a stateliness and dignity in the planning, especially in the
designing of vestibules, stairs, and halls, which render many of the
public buildings it produced well worthy of study. The architecture of
the Roman Revival was pompous and artificial, but seldom trivial, and
its somewhat affected grandeur was a welcome relief from the dull
extravagance of the styles it replaced.</p>


<p><b>THE GREEK REVIVAL.</b> The Roman revival was, however, displaced
in England and Germany by the Greek Revival, which set in near the close
of the eighteenth century. This was the result of a newly awakened
interest in the long-neglected monuments of Attic art which the
discoveries of Stuart and Revett&mdash;sent out in 1732 by the London
Society of Dilettanti&mdash;had once more made known to the world. It
led to a veritable <i>furore</i> in England for Greek Doric and Ionic
columns, which were applied indiscriminately to every class of
buildings, with utter disregard of propriety. The British taste was at
this time at its lowest ebb, and failed to perceive the poverty of Greek
architecture when deprived of its proper adornments of carving and
sculpture, which were singularly lacking in the British examples.
Nevertheless the Greek style in England had a long run of popular favor,
yielding only during the reign of the present sovereign to the so-called
Victorian Gothic, a&nbsp;revival of mediæval forms. In Germany the Greek
Revival was characterized by a more cultivated taste and a more rational
application of its forms, which were often freely modified to suit
modern needs. In France, where the Roman Revival under Louis XV. had
produced fairly satisfactory results, and where the influence of the
Royal School of Fine Arts (<i>École des Beaux-Arts</i>) tended to
perpetuate the
<span class="pagenum">356</span>
<a name="page356" id="page356"> </a>
principles of Roman design, the Greek Revival found no footing. The
Greek forms were seen to be too severe and intractable for present
requirements. About 1830, however, a&nbsp;modified style of design,
known since as the <i>Néo-Grec</i>, was introduced by the exertions of a
small coterie of talented architects; and though its own life was short,
it profoundly influenced French art in the direction of freedom and
refinement for a long time afterward. In Italy there was hardly anything
in the nature of a true revival of either Roman or Greek forms. The few
important works of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries
were conceived in the spirit of the late Renaissance, and took from the
prevalent revival of classicism elsewhere merely a greater correctness
of detail, not any radical change of form or spirit.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig198" id="fig198"> </a>
<img src="images/fig198.jpg" width="458" height="280"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 198.&mdash;BRITISH MUSEUM, LONDON.<!-- invisible . --></p>

<p><b>ENGLAND.</b> There was, strictly speaking, no Roman revival in
Great Britain. The modified Palladian style of Wren and Gibbs and their
successors continued until superseded by the Greek revival. The first
fruit of the new movement seems to have been the <b>Bank of England</b>
at London, by <i>Sir John Soane</i> (1788). In this edifice the
Greco-Roman order of the round temple at Tivoli was closely copied, and
applied to a long façade, too low for its length and with no sufficient
stylobate, but fairly effective with its recessed colonnade and
unpierced walls. The <b>British Museum</b>, by <i>Robert Smirke</i>
(Fig. 198), was a more ambitious essay in a more purely Greek style. Its
colossal Ionic colonnade was, however, a&nbsp;mere frontispiece, applied
to a badly planned and commonplace building, from which it cut off
needed light. The more modest but appropriate columnar façade to the
<b>Fitzwilliam Museum</b> at Cambridge, by <i>Bassevi</i>, was a more
successful attempt in the same direction, better proportioned and
avoiding the incongruity of modern windows in several stories. These
have always been the stumbling-block of the revived Greek style. The
<span class="pagenum">357</span>
<a name="page357" id="page357"> </a>
difficulties they raise are avoided, however, in buildings presenting
but two stories, the order being applied to the upper story, upon a high
stylobate serving as a basement. The <b>High School</b> and the Royal
Institution at Edinburgh, and the University at London, by
<i>Wilkins</i>, are for this reason, if for no other, superior to the
British Museum and other many-storied Anglo-Greek edifices. In spite of
all difficulties, however, the English extended the applications of the
style with doubtful success not only to all manner of public buildings,
but also to country residences. Carlton House, Bowden Park, and Grange
House are instances of this misapplication of Greek forms. Neither did
it prove more tractable for ecclesiastical purposes. <b>St.
Pancras’s</b> Church at London, and several churches by <i>Thomson</i>
(1817&ndash;75), in Glasgow, though interesting as experiments in such
adaptation, are not to be commended for imitation. The most successful
of all British Greek designs is perhaps <b>St. George’s
<span class="pagenum">358</span>
<a name="page358" id="page358"> </a>
Hall</b> at Liverpool (Fig. 199), whose imposing peristyle and porches
are sufficiently Greek in spirit and detail to class it among the works
of the Greek Revival. But its great hall and its interior composition
are really Roman and not Greek, emphasizing the teaching of experience
that Greek architecture does not lend itself to the exigencies of modern
civilization to nearly the same extent as the Roman.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig199" id="fig199"> </a>
<img src="images/fig199.jpg" width="429" height="173"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 199.&mdash;ST.<!-- invisible . --> GEORGE’S HALL, LIVERPOOL.</p>


<p><b>GERMANY.</b> During the eighteenth century the classic revival in
Germany, which at first followed Roman precedents (as in the columns
carved with spirally ascending reliefs in front of the church of <b>St.
Charles Borromeo</b>, at Vienna), was directed into the channel of Greek
imitation by the literary works of Winckelmann, Lessing, Goethe, and
others, as well as by the interest aroused by the discoveries of Stuart
and Revett. The <b>Brandenburg Gate</b> at Berlin (1784, by Langhans)
was an early example of this Hellenism in architecture, and one of its
most successful applications to civic purposes. Without precisely
copying any Greek structure, it was evidently inspired from the Athenian
Propylæa, and nothing in its purpose is foreign to the style employed.
The greatest activity in the style came later, however, and was greatly
stimulated by the achievements of <i>Fr. Schinkel</i> (1771&ndash;1841),
one of the greatest of modern German architects.
<span class="pagenum">359</span>
<a name="page359" id="page359"> </a>
While in the domical church of St. Nicholas at Potsdam, he employed
Roman forms in a modernized Roman conception, and followed in one or two
other buildings the principles of the Renaissance, his predilections
were for Greek architecture. His masterpiece was the <b>Museum</b> at
Berlin, with an imposing portico of 18 Ionic columns (Fig. 200). This
building with its fine rotunda was excellently planned, and forms, in
conjunction with the <b>New Museum</b> by <i>Stuhler</i>
(1843&ndash;55), a&nbsp;noble palace of art, to whose monumental
requirements and artistic purpose the Greek colonnades and pediments
were not inappropriate. Schinkel’s greatest successor was <i>Leo von
Klenze</i> (1784&ndash;1864), whose more textual reproductions of Greek
models won him great favor and wide employment. The <b>Walhalla</b> near
Ratisbon is a modernized Parthenon, internally vaulted with glass;
elegant externally, but too obvious a plagiarism to be greatly admired.
The <b>Ruhmeshalle</b> at Munich, a&nbsp;double <span class="sans">L</span> partly enclosing a colossal statue of Bavaria, and
devoted to the commemoration of Bavaria’s great men, is copied from no
Greek building, though purely Greek in design and correct to the
smallest detail. In the <b>Glyptothek</b> (Sculpture Gallery), in the
same city, the one distinctively
<span class="pagenum">360</span>
<a name="page360" id="page360"> </a>
Greek feature introduced by Klenze, an Ionic portico, is also the one
inappropriate note in the design. The <b>Propylæa</b> at Munich, by the
same (Fig. 201), and the <b>Court Theatre</b> at Berlin, by Schinkel,
are other important examples of the style. The latter is externally one
of the most beautiful theatres in Europe, though less ornate than many.
Schinkel’s genius was here remarkably successful in adapting Greek
details to the exigent difficulties of theatre design, and there is no
suggestion of copying any known Greek building.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig200" id="fig200"> </a>
<img src="images/fig200.jpg" width="427" height="182"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 200.<!-- invisible both . -->&mdash;THE OLD MUSEUM, BERLIN.</p>

<p>In Vienna the one notable monument of the Classic Revival is the
<b>Reichsrathsgebäude</b> or Parliament House, by <i>Th. Hansen</i>
(1843), an imposing two-storied composition with a lofty central
colonnade and lower side-wings, harmonious in general proportions and
pleasingly varied in outline and mass.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig201" id="fig201"> </a>
<img src="images/fig201.jpg" width="436" height="243"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 201.<!-- invisible both . -->&mdash;THE PROPYLÆA, MUNICH.</p>

<p>In general, the Greek Revival in Germany presents the aspect of a
sincere striving after beauty, on the part of a limited number of
artists of great talent, misled by the idea
<span class="pagenum">361</span>
<a name="page361" id="page361"> </a>
that the forms of a dead civilization could be galvanized into new life
in the service of modern needs. The result was disappointing, in spite
of the excellent planning, admirable construction and carefully studied
detail of these buildings, and the movement here as elsewhere was
foredoomed to failure.</p>


<p class="illustration float w180">
<a name="fig202" id="fig202"> </a>
<img src="images/fig202.png" width="170" height="249"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 202.&mdash;PLAN OF PANTHÉON, PARIS.<!-- invisible last two .
--></p>

<p><b>FRANCE.</b> In France the Classic Revival, as we have seen, had
made its appearance during the reign of Louis XV. in a number of
important monuments which expressed the protest of their authors against
the caprice of the Rococo style then in vogue. The colonnades of the
Garde-Meuble, the façade of St. Sulpice, and the coldly beautiful
<b>Panthéon</b> (Figs. 202, 203) testified to the conviction in the most
cultured minds of the time that Roman grandeur was to be attained only
by copying the forms of Roman architecture with the closest possible
approach to correctness. In the Panthéon, the greatest ecclesiastical
monument of its time in France (otherwise known as the church of Ste.
Genéviève), the spirit of correct classicism dominates the interior as
well as the exterior. It is a Greek cross, measuring 362 × 267 feet,
with a dome 265 feet high, and internally 69 feet in diameter. The four
arms have domical vaulting and narrow aisles separated by Corinthian
columns. The whole interior is a cold but extremely elegant composition.
The most notable features of the exterior are its imposing portico of
colossal Corinthian columns and the fine peristyle which surrounds the
drum of the dome, giving it great dignity and richness of effect.</p>

<span class="pagenum">362</span>
<a name="page362" id="page362"> </a>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig203" id="fig203"> </a>
<img src="images/fig203.jpg" width="252" height="363"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 203.&mdash;EXTERIOR OF PANTHÉON,<br>
PARIS.<!-- invisible all . --></p>

<p>The dome, which is of stone throughout, has three shells, the
intermediate shell serving to support the heavy stone lantern. The
architect was <i>Soufflot</i> (1713&ndash;81). The <b>Grand Théâtre</b>,
at Bordeaux (1773, by <i>Victor Louis</i>), one of the largest and
finest theatres in Europe, was another product of this movement, its
stately colonnade forming one of the chief ornaments of the city. Under
Louis XVI. there was a temporary reaction from this somewhat pompous
affectation of antique grandeur; but there were few important buildings
erected during that unhappy reign, and the reaction showed itself mainly
in a more delicate and graceful style of interior decoration. It was
reserved for the Empire to set the seal of official approval on the
Roman Revival.
<span class="illustration">
<a name="fig204" id="fig204"> </a>
<img src="images/fig204.jpg" width="286" height="325"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 204.&mdash;ARC DE L’ÉTOILE, PARIS.<!-- invisible all . --></span>
The Arch of Triumph of the Carrousel, behind the Tuileries, by
<i>Percier and Fontaine</i>, the magnificent Arc de l’Étoile, at the
summit of the Avenue of the Champs Elysées, by <i>Chalgrin</i>; the wing
begun by Napoleon to connect the Tuileries with the Louvre on the land
side, and the church of the Madeleine, by <i>Vignon</i>, erected as a
temple to the heroes of the Grande Armée, were all designed, in
accordance with the expressed will of the Emperor himself, in a style as
Roman as the requirements
<span class="pagenum">363</span>
<a name="page363" id="page363"> </a>
of each case would permit. All these monuments, begun between 1806 and
1809, were completed after the Restoration. The <b>Arch</b> of the
<b>Carrousel</b> is a close copy of Roman models; that of the
<b>Étoile</b> (Fig. 204) was a much more original design, of colossal
dimensions. Its admirable proportions, simple composition and striking
sculptures give it a place among the noblest creations of its class. The
<b>Madeleine</b> (Fig. 205), externally a Roman Corinthian temple of the
largest size, presents internally an almost Byzantine conception with
the three pendentive domes that vault its vast nave, but all the details
are Roman. However suitable for a pantheon or mausoleum, it seems
strangely inappropriate as a design for a Christian church. To these
monuments should be added the <b>Bourse</b> or Exchange, by
<i>Brongniart</i>, heavy in spite of its Corinthian peristyle, and the
river front of the <b>Corps Législatif</b> or Palais Bourbon, by
<i>Poyet</i>, the only extant example of a dodecastyle portico with a
pediment. All of these designs are characterized by great elegance of
detail and excellence of execution, and however inappropriate in style
to modern uses, they add immensely to the splendor of the French
capital. Unquestionably no feature can take the place of a Greek or
Roman
<span class="pagenum">364</span>
<a name="page364" id="page364"> </a>
colonnade as an embellishment for broad avenues and open squares, or as
the termination of an architectural vista.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig205" id="fig205"> </a>
<img src="images/fig205.jpg" width="424" height="284"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 205.<!-- invisible . -->&mdash;THE MADELEINE, PARIS.</p>

<p>The Greek revival took little hold of the Parisian imagination. Its
forms were too cold, too precise and fixed, too intractable to modern
requirements to appeal to the French taste. It counts but one notable
monument, the church of <b>St. Vincent de Paul</b>, by <i>Hittorff</i>,
who sought to apply to this design the principles of Greek external
polychromy; but the frescoes and ornaments failed to withstand the
Parisian climate, and were finally erased. The Néo-Grec movement already
referred to, initiated by Duc, Duban, and Labrouste about 1830, aimed
only to introduce into modern design the spirit and refinement, the
purity and delicacy of Greek art, not its forms (Fig. 206). Its chief
monuments were the remodelling, by <i>Duc</i>, of the <b>Palais de
Justice</b>, of which the new west façade is the most striking single
feature; the beautiful <b>Library of the École des Beaux-Arts</b>, by
<i>Duban</i>; the
<span class="pagenum">365</span>
<a name="page365" id="page365"> </a>
library of <b>Ste. Genéviève</b>, by <i>Labrouste</i>, in which a long
façade is treated without a pilaster or column, simple arches over a
massive basement forming the dominant motive, while in the interior a
system of iron construction with glazed domes controls the design; and
the commemorative <b>Colonne Juillet</b>, by Duc, the most elegant and
appropriate of all modern memorial columns. All these buildings, begun
between 1830 and 1850 and completed at various dates, are distinguished
by a remarkable purity and freedom of conception and detail, quite
unfettered by the artificial trammels of the official academic style
then prevalent.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig206" id="fig206"> </a>
<img src="images/fig206.jpg" width="262" height="422"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 206.&mdash;DOORWAY, ÉCOLE DES BEAUX-ARTS, PARIS.</p>


<p><b>THE CLASSIC REVIVAL ELSEWHERE.</b> The other countries of Europe
have little to show in the way of imitations of classic monuments or
reproductions of Roman colonnades. In Italy the church of
<b>S.&nbsp;Francesco di Paola</b>, at Naples, in quasi-imitation of the
Pantheon at Rome, with wing-colonnades, and the <b>Superga</b>, at Turin
(1706, by <i>Ivara</i>); the façade of the San Carlo Theatre, at Naples,
and the Braccio Nuovo of the Vatican (1817, by <i>Stern</i>) are the
monuments which come the nearest to the spirit and style of the Roman
<span class="pagenum">366</span>
<a name="page366" id="page366"> </a>
Revival. Yet in each of these there is a large element of originality
and freedom of treatment which renders doubtful their classification as
examples of that movement.</p>

<p>A reflection of the Munich school is seen in the modern public
buildings of Athens, designed in some cases by German architects, and in
others by native Greeks. The University, the Museum buildings, the
Academy of Art and Science, and other edifices exemplify fairly
successful efforts to adapt the severe details of classic Greek art to
modern windowed structures. They suffer somewhat from the too liberal
use of stucco in place of marble, and from the conscious affectation of
an extinct style. But they are for the most part pleasing and monumental
designs, adding greatly to the beauty of the modern city.</p>

<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig207" id="fig207"> </a>
<img src="images/fig207.jpg" width="224" height="254"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 207.&mdash;ST. ISAAC’S CATHEDRAL, ST.&nbsp;PETERSBURG.</p>

<p>In Russia, during and after the reign of Peter the Great
(1689&ndash;1725), there appeared a curious mixture of styles.
A&nbsp;style analogous to the Jesuit in Italy and the Churrigueresque in
Spain was generally prevalent, but it was in many cases modified by
Muscovite traditions into nondescript forms like those of the
<b>Kremlin</b>, at Moscow, or the less extravagant Citadel Church and
Smolnoy Monastery at St. Petersburg. Along with this heavy and barbarous
style, which prevails generally in the numerous palaces of the capital,
finished in stucco with atrocious details, a&nbsp;more severe and
classical spirit is met with. The church of the <b>Greek Rite</b> at St.
Petersburg
<span class="pagenum">367</span>
<a name="page367" id="page367"> </a>
combines a Roman domical interior with an exterior of the Greek Doric
order. The Church of <b>Our Lady of Kazan</b> has a semicircular
colonnade projecting from its transept, copying as nearly as may be the
colonnades in front of St. Peter’s. But the greatest classic monument in
Russia is the <b>Cathedral of St. Isaac</b> (Fig. 207), at St.
Petersburg, a&nbsp;vast rectangular edifice with four Roman Corinthian
pedimental colonnades projecting from its faces, and a dome with a
peristyle crowning the whole. Despite many defects of detail, and the
use of cast iron for the dome, which pretends to be of marble, this is
one of the most impressive churches of its size in Europe. Internally it
displays the costliest materials in extraordinary profusion, while
externally its noble colonnades go far to redeem its bare attic and the
material of its dome. The <b>Palace of the Grand Duke Michael</b>, which
reproduces, with improvements, Gabriel’s colonnades of the Garde Meuble
at Paris on its garden front, is a nobly planned and commendable design,
agreeably contrasting with the debased architecture of many of the
public buildings of the city. The Admiralty with its Doric pilasters,
and the <b>New Museum</b>, by von Klenze of Munich, in a skilfully
modified Greek style, with effective loggias, are the only other
monuments of the classic revival in Russia which can find mention in a
brief sketch like this. Both are notable and in many respects admirable
buildings, in part redeeming the vulgarity which is unfortunately so
prevalent in the architecture of St. Petersburg.</p>

<p>The <b>MONUMENTS</b> of the Classic Revival have been referred to in
the foregoing text at sufficient length to preclude the necessity of
further enumeration here.</p>




<span class="pagenum">368</span>
<a name="page368" id="page368"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXXVI" id="chapXXVI">CHAPTER XXVI.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
RECENT ARCHITECTURE IN EUROPE.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before, Chateau,
Fergusson. Also Barqui, <i>L’Architecture moderne en
France</i>.&mdash;<i>Berlin und seine Bauten</i> (and a series of
similar works on the modern buildings of other German cities). Daly,
<i>Architecture privée du XIXe siècle</i>. Garnier, <i>Le nouvel
Opéra</i>. Gourlier, <i>Choix d’édifices publics</i>. Licht,
<i>Architektur Deutschlands</i>. Lübke, <i>Denkmäler der Kunst</i>.
Lützow und Tischler, <i>Wiener Neubauten</i>. Narjoux, <i>Monuments
élevés par la ville de Paris, 1850&ndash;1880</i>. Rückwardt, <i>Façaden
und Details modernen Bauten</i>.&mdash;<i><ins class="correction"
title="text reads ‘Sammel mappe’">Sammelmappe</ins> hervorragenden
Concurrenz-Entwurfen.</i> Sédille, <i>L’Architecture moderne</i>.
Selfridge, <i>Modern French Architecture</i>. Statham, <i>Modern
Architecture</i>. Villars, <i>England, Scotland, and Ireland</i> (tr.
Henry Frith). Consult also <i>Transactions of the Royal Institute of
British Architects</i>, and the leading architectural journals of recent
years.</p>


<p><b>MODERN CONDITIONS.<!-- invisible . --></b> The nineteenth century
has been pre-eminently an age of industrial progress. Its most striking
advances have been along mechanical, scientific, and commercial lines.
As a result of this material progress the general conditions of mankind
in civilized countries have undoubtedly been greatly bettered. Popular
education and the printing-press have also raised the intellectual level
of society, making learning the privilege of even the poorest.
Intellectual, scientific, and commercial pursuits have thus largely
absorbed those energies which in other ages found exercise in the
creation of artistic forms and objects. The critical and sceptical
spirit, the spirit of utilitarianism and realism, has checked the free
and general development of the creative imagination, at least in the
plastic arts. While
<span class="pagenum">369</span>
<a name="page369" id="page369"> </a>
in poetry and music there have been great and noble achievements, the
plastic arts, including architecture, have only of late years attained a
position at all worthy of the intellectual advancement of the times.</p>

<p>Nevertheless the artistic spirit has never been wholly crushed out by
the untoward pressure of realism and commercialism. Unfortunately it has
repeatedly been directed in wrong channels. Modern archæology and the
publication of the forms of historic art by books and photographs have
too exclusively fastened attention upon the details of extinct styles as
a source of inspiration in design. The whole range of historic art is
brought within our survey, and while this has on the one hand tended
toward the confusion and multiplication of styles in modern work, it has
on the other led to a slavish adherence to historic precedent or a
literal copying of historic forms. Modern architecture has thus
oscillated between the extremes of archæological servitude and of an
unreasoning eclecticism. In the hands of men of inferior training the
results have been deplorable travesties of all styles, or meaningless
aggregations of ill-assorted forms.</p>

<p>An important factor in this demoralization of architectural design
has been the development of new constructive methods, especially in the
use of iron and steel. It has been impossible for modern designers, in
their treatment of style, to keep pace with the rapid changes in the
structural use of metal in architecture. The roofs of vast span, largely
composed of glass, which modern methods of trussing have made possible
for railway stations, armories, and exhibition buildings; the immense
unencumbered spaces which may be covered by them; the introduction and
development, especially in the United States, of the post-and-girder
system of construction for high buildings, in which the external walls
are a mere screen or filling-in; these have revolutionized architecture
so rapidly and completely
<span class="pagenum">370</span>
<a name="page370" id="page370"> </a>
that architects are still struggling and groping to find the solution of
many of the problems of style, scale, and composition which they have
brought forward.</p>

<p>Within the last thirty years, however, architecture has, despite
these new conditions, made notable advances. The artistic emulation of
repeated international exhibitions, the multiplication of museums and
schools of art, the general advance in intelligence and enlightenment,
have all contributed to this artistic progress. There appears to be more
of the artistic and intellectual quality in the average architecture of
the present time, on both sides of the Atlantic, than at any previous
period in this century. The futility of the archæological revival of
extinct styles is generally recognized. New conditions are gradually
procuring the solution of the very problems they raise. Historic
precedent sits more lightly on the architect than formerly, and the
essential unity of principle underlying all good design is coming to be
better understood.<a class="tag" name="tag26" id="tag26" href="#note26">26</a></p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig208" id="fig208"> </a>
<img src="images/fig208.png" width="430" height="203"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 208.&mdash;PLAN OF LOUVRE AND TUILERIES, PARIS.<br>
<span class="caption">
<i>A, A, the Old Louvre, so called; B,&nbsp;B, the New
Louvre.</i></span></p>

<p><b>FRANCE.</b> It is in France, Germany (including Austria), and
England that the architectural progress of this period in Europe has
been most marked. We have already noticed the results of the classic
revivals in these three countries. Speaking broadly, it may be said that
in France the influence of the <i>École des Beaux-Arts</i>, while it has
tended to give greater unity and consistency to the national
architecture, and has exerted a powerful influence in behalf of
refinement of taste and correctness of style, has also stood in the way
of a free development of new ideas. French architecture has throughout
adhered to the principles of the Renaissance, though the style has
during this century been modified by various influences. The first of
these was the Néo-Grec movement, alluded to in the last chapter, which
broke the grip of Roman tradition in matters of detail and gave greater
elasticity to the national style. Next should be mentioned the Gothic
movement represented by Viollet-le-Duc,
<span class="pagenum">371</span>
<a name="page371" id="page371"> </a>
Lassus, Ballu, and their followers. Beginning about 1845, it produced
comparatively few notable buildings, but gave a great impulse to the
study of mediæval archæology and the restoration of mediæval monuments.
The churches of Ste. Clothilde and of St. Jean de Belleville, at Paris,
and the reconstruction of the Château de Pierrefonds, were among its
direct results. Indirectly it led to a freer and more rational treatment
of constructive forms and materials than had prevailed with the academic
designers. The church of <b>St. Augustin</b>, by <i>Baltard</i>, at
Paris, illustrates this in its use of iron and brick for the dome and
vaulting, and the <b>College Chaptal</b>, by <i>E.&nbsp;Train</i>, in
its decorative treatment of brick and tile externally. The general
adoption of iron for roof-trusses and for the construction of markets
and similar buildings tended further in the same direction, the
<b>Halles Centrales</b> at Paris, by <i>Baltard</i>, being a notable
example.</p>


<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig209" id="fig209"> </a>
<img src="images/fig209.jpg" width="215" height="404"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 209.&mdash;PAVILION OF RICHELIEU, LOUVRE.</p>

<p><b>THE SECOND EMPIRE.</b> The reign of Napoleon III. (1852&ndash;70)
was a period of exceptional activity, especially in Paris. The greatest
monument of his reign was the completion of the <b>Louvre</b> and
<b>Tuileries</b>, under <i>Visconti</i> and
<span class="pagenum">372</span>
<a name="page372" id="page372"> </a>
<i>Lefuel</i>, including the remodelling of the pavilions de Flore and
de Marsan. The new portions constitute the most notable example of
modern French architecture, and the manner in which the two palaces were
united deserves high praise. In spite of certain defects, this work is
marked by a combination of dignity, richness, and refinement, such as
are rarely found in palace architecture (Figs. 208, 209). The <b>New
Opera</b> (1863&ndash;75), by <i>Garnier</i> (d.<!-- invisible .
-->&nbsp;1898), stands next to the Louvre in importance as a national
monument. It is by far the most sumptuous building for amusement in
existence, but in purity of detail and in the balance and restraint of
its design it is inferior to the work of Visconti and Lefuel (Fig. 210).
To this reign belong the Palais de l’Industrie, by <i>Viel</i>, built
for the exhibition of 1855, and several great railway stations (Gare du
Nord, by Hitorff, Gare de l’Est, Gare d’Orléans, etc.), in which the
modern French version of the Renaissance was applied with considerable
skill to buildings largely constructed of iron and glass. Town halls and
theatres were erected in great numbers, and in decorative works like
fountains and monuments the French were particularly successful. The
fountains of <b>St. Michel</b>, Cuvier, and Molière, at Paris, and of
<b>Longchamps</b>, at Marseilles (Fig. 211),
<span class="pagenum">373</span>
<a name="page373" id="page373"> </a>
illustrate the fertility of resource and elegance of detailed treatment
of the French in this department. Mention should also here be made of
the extensive enterprises carried out by Napoleon III., in rectifying
and embellishing the street-plan of Paris by new avenues and squares on
a vast scale, adding greatly to the monumental splendor of the city.</p>

<p class="illustration float w270">
<a name="fig210" id="fig210"> </a>
<img src="images/fig210.jpg" width="260" height="429"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 210.<!-- invisible . -->&mdash;GRAND STAIRCASE OF THE OPERA,
PARIS.</p>


<p><b>THE REPUBLIC.</b> Since the disasters of 1870 a number of
important structures have been erected, and French architecture has
shown a remarkable vitality and flexibility under new conditions. Its
productions have in general been marked by a refined taste and a
conspicuous absence of eccentricity and excess; but it has for the most
part trodden in well-worn paths. The most notable recent monuments are,
in church architecture, the <b>Sacré-Cœur</b>, at Montmartre, by
<i>Abadie</i>, a&nbsp;votive church inspired from the Franco-Byzantine
style of Aquitania; in civil architecture the new <b>Hôtel de Ville</b>,
at Paris, by <i>Ballu</i> and <i>Déperthes</i>, recalling the original
structure destroyed by the Commune, but in reality an original creation
of great merit; in scholastic
<span class="pagenum">374</span>
<a name="page374" id="page374"> </a>
architecture the new École de Médecine, and the new <b>Sorbonne</b>, by
<i>Nénot</i>, and in other branches of the art the metal-and-glass
exhibition buildings of 1878, 1889, and 1900. In the last of these the
striving for originality and the effort to discard traditional forms
reached the extreme, although accompanied by much very clever detail and
a masterly use of color-decoration.<!-- invisible . --> To these should
be added many noteworthy theatres, town-halls, court-houses, and
<i>préfectures</i> in provincial cities, and commemorative columns and
monuments almost without number. In street architecture there is now
much more variety and originality than formerly, especially in private
houses, and the reaction against the orders and against traditional
methods of design has of late been growing stronger.
<span class="pagenum">375</span>
<a name="page375" id="page375"> </a>
The chief excellence of modern French architecture lies in its rational
planning, monumental spirit, and refinement of detail (Fig. 212).</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig211" id="fig211"> </a>
<img src="images/fig211.jpg" width="348" height="357"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 211.&mdash;FOUNTAIN OF LONGCHAMPS, MARSEILLES.<!-- invisible last
two . --></p>


<p><b>GERMANY AND AUSTRIA.</b> German architecture has been more
affected during the past fifty years by the archæological spirit than
has the French. A&nbsp;pronounced mediæval revival partly accompanied,
partly followed the Greek revival in Germany, and produced a number of
churches and a few secular buildings in the basilican, Romanesque, and
Gothic styles.<!-- invisible . --> These are less interesting than those
in the Greek style, because mediæval forms are even more foreign to
modern needs than the classic, being compatible only with systems of
design and construction which are no longer practicable. At Munich the
Auekirche, by <i>Ohlmuller</i>, in an attenuated Gothic style; the
Byzantine Ludwigskirche, and <i>Ziebland’s</i> Basilica following Early
Christian models; the Basilica by <i>Hübsch<!-- invisible umlaut
--></i>, at Bulach, and the Votive Church at Vienna (1856) by
H.&nbsp;Von Ferstel (1828&ndash;1883) are notable neo-mediæval
monuments. The last-named church may be classed with Ste. Clothilde at
Paris (see <a href="#page371">p.&nbsp;371</a>), and St. Patrick’s
Cathedral at New York, all three being of approximately the same size
and general style, recalling St. Ouen at Rouen. They are correct and
elaborate, but more or less cold and artificial.</p>

<p class="illustration floatleft">
<a name="fig212" id="fig212"> </a>
<img src="images/fig212.jpg" width="262" height="197"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 212.&mdash;MUSÉE GALLIÉRA, PARIS.<!-- invisible last two . --></p>

<p>More successful are many of the German theatres and concert halls, in
which Renaissance and classic forms have been freely used. In several of
these the attempt has been
<span class="pagenum">376</span>
<a name="page376" id="page376"> </a>
made to express by the external form the curvilinear plan of the
auditorium, as in the <b>Dresden Theatre</b>, by <i>Semper</i> (1841;
Fig. 213), the theatre at Carlsruhe, by Hübsch, and the double
winter-summer <b>Victoria Theatre</b>, at Berlin, by <i>Titz</i>. But
the practical and æsthetic difficulties involved in this treatment have
caused its general abandonment. The <b>Opera House</b> at Vienna, by
<i>Siccardsburg</i> and <i>Van der Null</i> (1861&ndash;69), is
rectangular in its masses, and but for a certain triviality of detail
would rank among the most successful buildings of its kind. The new
<b>Burgtheater</b> in the same city is a more elaborately ornate
structure in Renaissance style, somewhat florid and overdone.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig213" id="fig213"> </a>
<img src="images/fig213.jpg" width="431" height="250"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 213.<!-- invisible both . -->&mdash;THEATRE AT DRESDEN.</p>

<p>Modern German architecture is at its best in academic and residential
buildings. The <b><ins class="correction" title="text has ‘Bauschüle’ with umlaut">Bauschule</ins></b>, at Berlin, by Schinkel, in
which brick is used in a rational and dignified design without the
orders; the Polytechnic School, at Zürich, by Semper; university
buildings, and especially buildings for technical instruction, at
Carlsruhe, Stuttgart, Strasburg, Vienna, and other cities, show a
monumental
<span class="pagenum">377</span>
<a name="page377" id="page377"> </a>
treatment of the exterior and of the general distribution, combined with
a careful study of practical requirements. In administrative buildings
the Germans have hardly been as successful; and the new <b>Parliament
House</b>, at Berlin, by <i>Wallot</i>, in spite of its splendor and
costliness, is heavy and unsatisfactory in detail. The larger cities,
especially Berlin, contain many excellent examples of house
architecture, mostly in the Renaissance style, sufficiently monumental
in design, though usually, like most German work, inclined to heaviness
of detail. The too free use of stucco in imitation of stone is also open
to criticism.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig214" id="fig214"> </a>
<img src="images/fig214.jpg" width="434" height="344"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 214.&mdash;BLOCK OF DWELLINGS (MARIE-THERESIENHOF), VIENNA.<!--
invisible all . --></p>

<p><b>VIENNA.</b> During the last thirty years Vienna has undergone a
transformation which has made it the rival of Paris as a stately
capital. The remodelling of the central portion, the creation of a
series of magnificent boulevards and
<span class="pagenum">378</span>
<a name="page378" id="page378"> </a>
squares, and the grouping of the chief state and municipal buildings
about these upon a monumental scheme of arrangement, have given the city
an unusual aspect of splendor. Among the most important monuments in
this group are the <b>Parliament House</b>, by Hansen (see <a href="#page360">p.&nbsp;360</a>), and the <b>Town Hall</b>, by
<i>Schmidt</i>. This latter is a Neo-Gothic edifice of great size and
pretentiousness, but strangely thin and meagre in detail, and quite out
of harmony with its surroundings. The university and museums are massive
piles in Renaissance style; and it is the Renaissance rather than the
classic or Gothic revival which prevails throughout the new city. The
great blocks of residences and apartments (Fig. 214) which line its
streets are highly ornate in their architecture, but for the most part
done in stucco, which fails after all to give the aspect of solidity and
durability which it seeks to counterfeit.</p>

<p>The city of <b>Buda-Pesth</b> has also in recent years undergone a
phenomenal transformation of a similar nature to that effected in
Vienna, but it possesses fewer monuments of conspicuous architectural
interest. The <b>Synagogue</b> is the most noted of these, a&nbsp;rich
and pleasing edifice of brick in a modified Hispano-Moresque style.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig215" id="fig215"> </a>
<img src="images/fig215.jpg" width="324" height="349"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 215.<!-- invisible . -->&mdash;HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT, WESTMINSTER,
LONDON.</p>

<p><b>GREAT BRITAIN.</b> During the closing years of the Anglo-Greek
style a coterie of enthusiastic students of British mediæval
monuments&mdash;archæologists rather than architects&mdash;initiated a
movement for the revival of the national Gothic architecture. The first
fruits of this movement, led by Pugin, Brandon, Rickman, and others
(about 1830&ndash;40), were seen in countless pseudo-Gothic structures
in which the pointed arches, buttresses, and clustered shafts of
mediæval architecture were imitated or parodied according to the
designer’s ability, with frequent misapprehension of their proper use or
significance. This unintelligent misapplication of Gothic forms was,
however, confined to the earlier stages of the movement. With increasing
light and experience
<span class="pagenum">379</span>
<a name="page379" id="page379"> </a>
came a more correct and consistent use of the mediæval styles, dominated
by the same spirit of archæological correctness which had produced the
<i>classicismo</i> of the Late Renaissance in Italy. This spirit,
stimulated by extensive enterprises in the restoration of the great
mediæval monuments of the United Kingdom, was fatal to any free and
original development of the style along new lines. But it rescued church
architecture from the utter meanness and debasement into which it had
fallen, and established a standard of taste which reacted on all other
branches of design.</p>


<p class="illustration float w210">
<a name="fig216" id="fig216"> </a>
<img src="images/fig216.jpg" width="224" height="488"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 216.&mdash;ASSIZE COURTS, MANCHESTER. DETAIL.</p>

<p><b>THE VICTORIAN GOTHIC.</b> Between 1850 and 1870 the striving after
archæological correctness gave place to the more rational effort to
adapt Gothic principles to modern
<span class="pagenum">380</span>
<a name="page380" id="page380"> </a>
requirements, instead of merely copying extinct styles. This effort,
prosecuted by a number of architects of great intelligence, culture, and
earnestness (Sir Gilbert Scott, George Edmund Street, William Burges,
and others), resulted in a number of extremely interesting buildings.
Chief among these in size and cost stand the <b>Parliament Houses</b> at
Westminster, by <i>Sir Charles Barry</i> (begun 1839), in the
Perpendicular style. This immense structure (Fig. 215), imposing in its
simple masses and refined in its carefully studied detail, is the most
successful monument of the Victorian Gothic style. It suffers, however,
from the want of proper relation of scale between its decorative
elements and the vast proportions of the edifice, which belittle its
component elements. It cannot, on the whole, be claimed as a successful
vindication of the claims of the promoters of the style as to the
adaptability of Gothic forms to structures planned and built after the
modern fashion. The <b>Assize Courts</b> at Manchester (Fig. 216), the
<b>New Museum</b> at Oxford, the gorgeous <b>Albert Memorial</b> at
London, by <i>Scott</i>, and the <b>New Law Courts</b> at London, by
<i>Street</i>, are
<span class="pagenum">381</span>
<a name="page381" id="page381"> </a>
all conspicuous illustrations of the same truth. They are conscientious,
carefully studied designs in good taste, and yet wholly unsuited in
style to their purpose. They are like labored and scholarly verse in a
foreign tongue, correct in form and language, but lacking the
naturalness and charm of true and unfettered inspiration. A&nbsp;later
essay of the same sort in a slightly different field is the <b>Natural
History Museum</b> at South Kensington, by <i>Waterhouse</i> (1879), an
imposing building in a modified Romanesque style (Fig. 217).</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig217" id="fig217"> </a>
<img src="images/fig217.jpg" width="260" height="460"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 217.&mdash;NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM, LONDON.</p>


<p><b>OTHER WORKS.</b> The Victorian Gothic style responded to no deep
and general movement of the popular taste, and, like the Anglo-Greek
style, was doomed to failure from the inherent incongruity between
modern needs and mediæval forms. Within the last twenty years there has
been a quite general return to Renaissance principles, and the result is
seen in a large number of town-halls, exchanges, museums, and colleges,
in which Renaissance forms, with and without the orders, have been
treated with increasing freedom and skilful
<span class="pagenum">382</span>
<a name="page382" id="page382"> </a>
adaptation to the materials and special requirements of each case. The
Albert Memorial Hall (1863, by General Scott) may be taken as an early
instance of this movement, and the <b>Imperial Institute</b> (Colonial
offices), by Collcutt, and Oxford Town Hall, by Aston Webb, as among its
latest manifestations. In domestic architecture the so-called Queen Anne
style has been much in vogue, as practised by Norman Shaw, Ernest
George, and others. It is really a modern style, originating in the
imitation of the modified Palladian style as used in the brick
architecture of Queen Anne’s time, but freely and often artistically
altered to meet modern tastes and needs.</p>

<p>In its emancipation from the mistaken principles of archæological
revivals, and in its evidences of improved taste and awakened
originality, contemporary British architecture shows promise of good
things to come. It is still inferior to the French in the monumental
quality, in technical resource and refinement of decorative detail.</p>


<p><b>ELSEWHERE IN EUROPE.</b> In other European countries recent
architecture shows in general increasing freedom and improved good
taste, but both its opportunities and its performance have been nowhere
else as conspicuous as in France, Germany, and England. The costly
Bourse and the vast but overloaded Palais de Justice at Brussels, by
<i>Polaert</i>, are neither of them conspicuous for refined and
cultivated taste. A&nbsp;few buildings of note in Switzerland, Russia,
and Greece might find mention in a more extended review of architecture,
but cannot here even be enumerated. In Italy, especially at Rome, Milan,
Naples, and Turin, there has been a great activity in building since
1870, but with the exception of the <b>Monument to Victor Emmanuel</b>
and the National Museum at Rome, monumental arcades and passages at
Milan and Naples, and <i>Campi Santi</i> or monumental cemeteries at
Bologna, Genoa, and one or two other places, there has been almost
nothing of real importance built in Italy of late years.<!-- invisible .
--></p>

<p class="footnote">
<a name="note26" id="note26" href="#tag26">26.</a>
See <a href="#appD">Appendix D</a>.</p>




<span class="pagenum">383</span>
<a name="page383" id="page383"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXXVII" id="chapXXVII">CHAPTER XXVII.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
ARCHITECTURE IN THE UNITED STATES.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: As before,
Fergusson, Statham. Also, Chandler, <i>The Colonial Architecture of
Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Virginia</i>. Cleaveland and Campbell,
<i>American Landmarks</i>. Corner and Soderholz, <i>Colonial
Architecture in New England</i>. Crane and Soderholz, <i>Examples of
Colonial Architecture in Charleston and Savannah</i>. Drake, <i>Historic
Fields and Mansions of Middlesex</i>. Everett, <i>Historic Churches of
America</i>. King, <i>Handbook of Boston</i>; <i>Handbook of New
York</i>. Little, <i>Early New England Interiors</i>. Schuyler,
<i>American Architecture</i>. Van Rensselaer, <i>H.&nbsp;H. Richardson
and His Works</i>. Wallis, <i>Old Colonial Architecture and
Furniture</i>.</p>


<p><b>GENERAL REMARKS.</b> The colonial architecture of modern times
presents a peculiar phenomenon. The colonizing nation, carrying into its
new <i>habitat</i> the tastes and practices of a long-established
civilization, modifies these only with the utmost reluctance, under the
absolute compulsion of new conditions. When the new home is virgin soil,
destitute of cultivation, government, or civilized inhabitants, the
accompaniments and activities of civilization introduced by the
colonists manifest themselves at first in curious contrast to the
primitive surroundings. The struggle between organized life and chaos,
the laborious subjugation of nature to the requirements of our complex
modern life, for a considerable period absorb the energies of the
colonists. The amenities of culture, the higher intellectual life, the
refinements of art can, during this period, receive little
<span class="pagenum">384</span>
<a name="page384" id="page384"> </a>
attention. Meanwhile a new national character is being formed; the
people are undergoing the moral training upon which their subsequent
achievements must depend. With the conquest of brute nature, however,
and the gradual emergence of a more cultivated class, with the growth of
commerce and wealth and the consequent increase of leisure, the
humanities find more place in the colonial life. The fine arts appear in
scattered centres determined by peculiarly favorable conditions. For a
long time they retain the impress, and seek to reproduce the forms, of
the art of the mother country. But new conditions impose a new
development. Maturing commerce with other lands brings in foreign
influences, to which the still unformed colonial art is peculiarly
susceptible. Only with political and commercial independence, fully
developed internal resources, and a high national culture do the arts
finally attain, as it were, their majority, and enter upon a truly
national growth.</p>

<p>These facts are abundantly illustrated by the architectural history
of the United States. The only one among the British colonies to attain
political independence, it is the only one among them whose architecture
has as yet entered upon an independent course of development, and this
only within the last twenty-five or thirty years. Nor has even this
development produced as yet a distinctive local style. It has, however,
originated new constructive methods, new types of buildings, and a
distinctively American treatment of the composition and the masses; the
decorative details being still, for the most part, derived from historic
precedents. The architecture of the other British colonies has retained
its provincial character, though producing from time to time individual
works of merit. In South America and Mexico the only buildings of
importance are Spanish, French, or German in style, according to the
nationality of the architects employed. The following
<span class="pagenum">385</span>
<a name="page385" id="page385"> </a>
sketch of American architecture refers, therefore, exclusively to its
development in the United States.</p>


<p><b>FORMATIVE PERIOD.</b> Buildings in stone were not undertaken by
the early English colonists. The more important structures in the
Southern and Dutch colonies were of brick imported from Europe. Wood
was, however, the material most commonly employed, especially in New
England, and its use determined in large measure the form and style of
the colonial architecture. There was little or no striving for
architectural elegance until well into the eighteenth century, when
Wren’s influence asserted itself in a modest way in the Middle and
Southern colonies. The very simple and unpretentious town-hall at
Williamsburg, Va., and St. Michael’s, Charleston, are attributed to him;
but the most that can be said for these, as for the brick churches and
manors of Virginia previous to 1725, is that they are simple in design
and pleasing in proportion, without special architectural elegance. The
same is true of the wooden houses and churches of New England of the
period, except that they are even simpler in design.</p>

<p class="illustration float w240">
<a name="fig218" id="fig218"> </a>
<img src="images/fig218.jpg" width="241" height="315"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 218.&mdash;CHRIST CHURCH, PHILADELPHIA.<!-- invisible all . --></p>

<p>From 1725 to 1775 increased population and wealth along the coast
brought about a great advance in architecture, especially in churches
and in the dwellings of the wealthy. During this period was developed
the <i>Colonial style</i>, based on that of the reigns of Anne and the
first two Georges in England, and in church architecture on the models
set by Wren and Gibbs. All the details were, however, freely modified by
the general employment of wood. The scarcity of architects trained in
Old World traditions contributed to this departure from classic
precision of form. The style, especially in interior design, reflected
the cultured taste of the colonial aristocracy in its refined treatment
of the woodwork. But there was little or no architecture of a truly
monumental character. Edifices of stone were singularly few, and
administrative buildings were small and modest,
<span class="pagenum">386</span>
<a name="page386" id="page386"> </a>
owing to insufficient grants from the Crown, as well as to the poverty
of the colonies.</p>

<p>The churches of this period include a number of interesting designs,
especially pleasing in the forms of their steeples. The “<b>Old
South</b>” at Boston (now a museum), Trinity at Newport, and <b>St.
Paul’s</b> at New York&mdash;one of the few built of stone
(1764)&mdash;are good examples of the style. <b>Christ Church</b> at
Philadelphia (1727&ndash;35, by Dr. Kearsley) is another example,
historically as well as architecturally interesting (Fig. 218); and
there are scores of other churches almost equally noteworthy, scattered
through New England, Maryland, Virginia, and the Middle States.</p>


<p><b>DWELLINGS.</b> These reflect better than the churches the varying
tastes of the different colonies. Maryland and Virginia abound in fine
brick manor-houses, set amid extensive grounds walled in and entered
through iron gates of artistic design. The interior finish of these
houses was often elaborate in conception and admirably executed.
Westover (1737), Carter’s Grove (1737) in Virginia, and the Harwood and
Hammond Houses at Annapolis, Md. (1770), are examples. The majority of
the New England houses were of wood, more compact in plan, more varied
and picturesque in design than those of the South, but wanting somewhat
of their stateliness.
<span class="pagenum">387</span>
<a name="page387" id="page387"> </a>
The interior finish of wainscot, cornices, stairs, and mantelpieces
shows, however, the same general style, in a skilful and artistic
adaptation of classic forms to the slender proportions of wood
construction. Externally the orders appear in porches and in colossal
pilasters, with well designed entablatures, and windows of Italian
model. The influence of the <ins class="correction" title="consistent error for ‘Adam’">Adams</ins> and Sheraton furniture is
doubtless to be seen in these quaint and often charming versions of
classic motives. The Hancock House, Boston (of stone, demolished); the
Sherburne House, Portsmouth (1730); Craigie House, Cambridge (1757, Fig.
219); and Rumford House, North Woburn (Mass.), are typical examples.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig219" id="fig219"> </a>
<img src="images/fig219.jpg" width="431" height="287"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 219.&mdash;CRAIGIE (LONGFELLOW) HOUSE, CAMBRIDGE.<!-- invisible .
--></p>

<p>In the Middle States architectural activity was chiefly centred in
Philadelphia and New York, and one or two other towns, where a number of
manor-houses, still
<span class="pagenum">388</span>
<a name="page388" id="page388"> </a>
extant, attest the wealth and taste of the time. It is noticeable that
the veranda or piazza was confined to the Southern States, but that the
climate seems to have had little influence on the forms of roofs. These
were gambrelled, hipped, gabled, or flat, alike in the North and South,
according to individual taste.</p>


<p><b>PUBLIC BUILDINGS.</b> Of public and monumental architecture this
period has little to show. Large cities did not exist; New York, Boston,
and Philadelphia were hardly more than overgrown villages. The public
buildings&mdash;court-houses and town-halls&mdash;were modest and
inexpensive structures. The Old State House and Faneuil Hall at Boston,
the Town Hall at Newport (R.I.), and Independence Hall at Philadelphia,
the best known of those now extant, are not striking architecturally.
Monumental design was beyond the opportunities and means of the
colonies. It was in their churches, all of moderate size, and in their
dwellings that the colonial builders achieved their greatest successes;
and these works are quaint, charming, and refined, rather than
impressive or imposing.</p>

<p>To the latter part of the colonial period belong a number of
interesting buildings which remain as monuments of Spanish rule in
California, Florida, and the Southwest. The old Fort S.&nbsp;Marco, now
Fort Marion (1656&ndash;1756), and the Catholic cathedral (1793; after
the fire of 1887 rebuilt in its original form with the original façade
uninjured), both at St. Augustine, Fla.; the picturesque buildings of
the California missions (mainly 1769&ndash;1800), the majority of them
now in ruins; scattered Spanish churches in California, Arizona, and New
Mexico, and a few unimportant secular buildings, display among their
modern and American settings a picturesque and interesting Spanish
aspect and character, though from the point of view of architectural
detail they represent merely a crude phase of the Churrigueresque
style.</p>


<span class="pagenum">389</span>
<a name="page389" id="page389"> </a>
<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig220" id="fig220"> </a>
<img src="images/fig220.jpg" width="355" height="243"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 220.&mdash;NATIONAL CAPITOL, WASHINGTON.</p>

<p><b>EARLY REPUBLICAN PERIOD.</b> Between the Revolution and the War of
1812, under the new conditions of independence and self-government,
architecture took on a more monumental character. Buildings for the
State and National administrations were erected with the rapidly
increasing resources of the country. Stone was more generally used;
colonnades, domes, and cupolas or bell-towers, were adopted as
indispensable features of civic architecture. In church-building the
Wren-Gibbs type continued to prevail, but with greater correctness of
classic forms. The gambrel roof tended to disappear from the houses of
this period, and there was some decline in the refinement and delicacy
of the details of architecture. The influence of the Louis XVI. style is
traceable in many cases, as in the New York City Hall (1803&ndash;12, by
<i>McComb</i> and <i>Mangin</i>), one of the very best designs of the
time, and in the delicate stucco-work and interior finish of many
houses, The original <b>Capitol</b> at Washington&mdash;the central
portion of the present edifice&mdash;by <i>Thornton</i>, <i>Hallet</i>,
and <i>B.&nbsp;H. Latrobe</i> (1793&ndash;1830; Fig. 220),
<span class="pagenum">390</span>
<a name="page390" id="page390"> </a>
the <b>State House</b> at Boston (1795, by <i>Bulfinch</i>), and the
University of Virginia, at Charlotteville, by <i>Thomas Jefferson</i>
(1817; recently destroyed in part by fire), are the most interesting
examples of the classic tendencies of this period. Their freedom from
the rococo vulgarities generally prevalent at the time in Europe is
noticeable.</p>


<p class="illustration float w270">
<a name="fig221" id="fig221"> </a>
<img src="images/fig221.jpg" width="264" height="327"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 221.&mdash;CUSTOM HOUSE, NEW YORK.</p>

<p><b>THE CLASSIC REVIVAL.</b> The influence of the classic revivals of
Europe began to appear before the close of this period, and reached its
culmination about 1830&ndash;40. It left its impress most strongly on
our Federal architecture, although it invaded domestic architecture,
producing countless imitations, in brick and wooden houses, of Grecian
colonnades and porticos. One of its first-fruits was the White House, or
Executive Mansion, at Washington, by <i>Hoban</i> (1792), recalling the
large English country houses of the time. The <b>Treasury</b> and
<b>Patent Office</b> buildings at Washington, the Philadelphia Mint, the
<b>Sub-treasury</b> and <b>Custom House</b> at New York (the latter
erected originally for a bank; Fig. 221), and the <b>Boston Custom
House</b> are among the important Federal buildings of this period.
Several State capitols were also erected under the same influence; and
the Marine Exchange and <b>Girard College</b> at Philadelphia should
also be mentioned
<span class="pagenum">391</span>
<a name="page391" id="page391"> </a>
as conspicuous examples of the pseudo-Greek style. The last-named
building is a Corinthian dormitory, its tiers of small windows
contrasting strangely with its white marble columns. These classic
buildings were solidly and carefully constructed, but lacked the grace,
cheerfulness, and appropriateness of earlier buildings. The Capitol at
Washington was during this period greatly enlarged by terminal wings
with fine Corinthian porticos, of Roman rather than Greek design. The
<b>Dome</b>, by <i>Walters</i>, was not added until 1858&ndash;73; it is
a successful and harmonious composition, nobly completing the building.
Unfortunately, it is an afterthought, built of iron painted to simulate
marble, the substructure being inadequate to support a dome of masonry.
The Italian or Roman style which it exemplified, in time superseded the
less tractable Greek style.</p>


<p><b>THE WAR PERIOD.</b> The period from 1850 to 1876 was one of
intense political activity and rapid industrial progress. The former
culminated in the terrible upheaval of the civil war; the latter in the
completion of the Pacific Railroad (1869) and a remarkable development
of the mining resources and manufactures of the country. It was a period
of feverish commercial activity, but of artistic stagnation, and
witnessed the erection of but few buildings of architectural importance.
A&nbsp;number of State capitols, city halls and churches, of
considerable size and cost but of inferior design, attest the decline of
public taste and architectural skill during these years. The huge
Municipal Building at Philadelphia and the still unfinished Capitol at
Albany are full of errors of planning and detail which twenty-five years
of elaboration have failed to correct. Next to the dome of the Capitol
at Washington, completed during this period, of which it is the most
signal architectural achievement, its most notable monument was the
<b>St. Patrick’s Cathedral</b> at New York, by <i>Renwick</i>;
a&nbsp;Gothic church which, if somewhat cold and mechanical in detail,
is
<span class="pagenum">392</span>
<a name="page392" id="page392"> </a>
a&nbsp;stately and well-considered design. Its west front and spires
(completed 1886) are particularly successful. Trinity Church (1843, by
<i>Upjohn</i>) and Grace Church (1840, by Renwick), though of earlier
date, should be classed with this cathedral as worthy examples of modern
Gothic design. Indeed, the churches designed in this style by a few
thoroughly trained architects during this period are the most creditable
and worthy among its lesser productions. In general an undiscriminating
eclecticism of style prevailed, unregulated by sober taste or technical
training. The Federal buildings by <i>Mullett</i> were monuments of
perverted design in a heavy and inartistic rendering of French
Renaissance motives. The New York Post Office and the State, Army and
Navy Department building at Washington are examples of this style.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig222" id="fig222"> </a>
<img src="images/fig222.jpg" width="431" height="382"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 222.&mdash;TRINITY CHURCH, BOSTON.</p>

<p><b>THE ARTISTIC AWAKENING.</b> Between 1870 and 1880 a remarkable
series of events exercised a powerful influence on the artistic life of
the United States. Two terrible conflagrations in Chicago (1871) and
Boston (1872) gave unexampled opportunities for architectural
improvement and greatly stimulated the public interest in the art. The
feverish and abnormal industrial activity which followed the war and the
rapid growth of the parvenu spirit were checked by the disastrous
“panic” of 1873. With the completion of the Pacific railways and the
settlement of new communities in the West, industrial prosperity, when
it returned, was established on a firmer basis. An extraordinary
expansion of travel to Europe began to disseminate the seeds of artistic
culture throughout the country. The successful establishment of schools
of architecture in Boston (1866) and other cities, and the opening or
enlargement of art museums in New York, Boston, Philadelphia, Baltimore,
Detroit, Milwaukee, and elsewhere, stimulated the artistic awakening
which now manifested itself. In architecture the personal influence of
two men, trained in the Paris École des Beaux-Arts,<!-- invisible hyphen
-->
<span class="pagenum">393</span>
<a name="page393" id="page393"> </a>
was especially felt&mdash;of <i>R.&nbsp;M. Hunt</i> (1827&ndash;95)
through his words and deeds quite as much as through his works; and of
<i>H.&nbsp;H. Richardson</i> (1828&ndash;86) predominantly through his
works. These two men, with others of less fame but of high ideals and
thorough culture, did much to elevate architecture as an art in the
public esteem. To all these influences new force was added by the
Centennial Exhibition at Philadelphia (1876). Here for the first time
the American people were brought into contact, in their own land, with
the products of European and Oriental art. It was to them an artistic
revelation, whose results were prompt and far-reaching. Beginning first
in the domain of industrial and decorative art, its stimulating
influence rapidly extended to painting and architecture, and with
permanent consequences. American students began to throng the centres of
Old World art, while the setting of higher standards of artistic
excellence at home, and the development of important art-industries,
were other fruits of this artistic awakening. The recent Columbian
Exhibition at Chicago (1893), its latest and most important
manifestation, has added a new impulse to the movement, especially in
architecture.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig223" id="fig223"> </a>
<img src="images/fig223.jpg" width="433" height="299"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 223.&mdash;LIBRARY AT WOBURN, MASS.</p>

<p><b>STYLE IN RECENT ARCHITECTURE.</b> The rapid increase in the number
of American architects trained in Paris or under the indirect influence
of the École des Beaux-Arts has been an important factor in recent
architectural progress. Yet it has by no means imposed the French
academic formulæ upon American architecture. The conditions, materials,
and constructive processes here prevailing, and above all the
eclecticism of the public taste, have prevented this. The French
influence is perceived rather in a growing appreciation of monumental
design in the planning, composition, and setting of buildings, than in
any direct imitation of French models. The Gothic revival which
prevailed more or less widely from 1840 to 1875, as already noticed, and
of which the <b>State Capitol</b> at Hartford
<span class="pagenum">394</span>
<a name="page394" id="page394"> </a>
(Conn.; 1875&ndash;78), and the <b>Fine Arts Museum</b> at Boston, were
among the last important products, was generally confined to church
architecture, for which Gothic forms are still largely employed, as in
the Protestant <b>Cathedral</b> of <b>All Saints</b> now building at
Albany (N.Y.), by an English architect. For the most part the works of
the last twenty years show a more or less judicious eclecticism, the
choice of style being determined partly by the person and training of
the designer, partly by the nature of the building. The powerfully
conceived works of Richardson, in a free version of the French
Romanesque, for a time exercised a wide influence, especially among the
younger architects. <b>Trinity Church</b>, Boston (<a href="#fig222">Fig. 222</a>), his earliest important work; many public
libraries and business buildings, and finally the impressive <b>County
Buildings</b> at Pittsburgh (Pa.), all
<span class="pagenum">395</span>
<a name="page395" id="page395"> </a>
treated in this style, are admirable rather for the strong individuality
of their designer, displayed in their vigorous composition, than on
account of the historic style he employed (Fig. 223). Yet it appeared in
his hands so flexible and effective that it was widely imitated. But if
easy to use, it is most difficult to use well; its forms are too massive
for ordinary purposes, and in the hands of inferior designers it was so
often travestied that it has now lost its wide popularity. While a
number of able architects have continued to use it effectively in
ecclesiastical, civic, and even commercial architecture, it is being
generally superseded by various forms of the Renaissance. Here also a
wide eclecticism prevails, the works of the same architect often varying
from the gayest Francis&nbsp;I. designs in domestic architecture, or
free adaptations of Quattrocento details for theatres and street
architecture, to the most formal classicism in colossal
exhibition-buildings, museums, libraries, and the like. Meanwhile there
are many more or less successful ventures in other historic
<span class="pagenum">396</span>
<a name="page396" id="page396"> </a>
styles applied to public and private edifices. Underlying this apparent
confusion, almost anarchy in the use of historic styles, the careful
observer may detect certain tendencies crystallizing into definite form.
New materials and methods of construction, increased attention to
detail, a&nbsp;growing sense of monumental requirements, even the
development of the elevator as a substitute for the grand staircase, are
leaving their mark on the planning, the proportions, and the artistic
composition of American buildings, irrespective of the styles used. The
art is with us in a state of transition, and open to criticism in many
respects; but it appears to be full of life and promise for the
future.</p>


<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig224" id="fig224"> </a>
<img src="images/fig224.jpg" width="157" height="283"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 224.&mdash;“TIMES” BUILDING, NEW YORK.</p>

<p><b>COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS.</b> This class of edifices has in our great
cities developed wholly new types, which have taken shape under four
imperative influences. These are the demand for fire-proof construction,
the demand for well-lighted offices, the introduction of elevators, and
the concentration of business into limited areas, within which land has
become inordinately costly. These causes have led to the erection of
buildings of excessive height (Fig. 224); the more recent among them
constructed with a framework of iron or steel columns and beams, the
visible walls being a mere filling-in. To render a building of twenty
stories attractive to the eye, especially when built on an irregular
site, is a difficult problem, of which a wholly satisfactory solution
has yet to be found. There have been, however, some notable achievements
in this line, in most of which the principle has been clearly recognized
that a lofty building should have a well-marked
<span class="pagenum">397</span>
<a name="page397" id="page397"> </a>
basement or pedestal and a somewhat ornate crowning portion or capital,
the intervening stories serving as a die or shaft and being treated with
comparative simplicity. The difficulties of scale and of handling one
hundred and fifty to three hundred windows of uniform style have been
surmounted with conspicuous skill (<b>American Surety Building</b> and
Broadway Chambers, New York; Ames Building, Boston; Carnegie Building,
Pittsburgh; Union Trust, St. Louis). In some cases, especially in
Chicago and the Middle West, the metallic framework is suggested by
slender piers between the windows, rising uninterrupted from the
basement to the top story. In others, especially in New York and the
East, the walls are treated as in ordinary masonry buildings. The
Chicago school is marked by a more utilitarian and unconventional
treatment, with results which are often extremely bold and effective,
but rarely as pleasing to the eye as those attained by the more
conservative Eastern school. In the details of American office-buildings
every variety of style is to be met with; but the Romanesque and the
Renaissance, freely modified, predominate. The tendency towards two or
three well-marked types in the external composition of these buildings,
as above suggested, promises, however, the evolution of a style in which
the historic origin of the details will be a secondary matter. Certain
Chicago architects have developed an original treatment of architectural
forms by exaggerating some of the structural lines, by suppressing the
mouldings and more familiar historic forms, and by the free use of flat
surface ornament. The Schiller, Auditorium, and Fisher Buildings, all at
Chicago, Guaranty Building, Buffalo, and Majestic Building, Detroit, are
examples of this personal style, which illustrates the untrammelled
freedom of the art in a land without traditions.<a class="tag" name="tag27" id="tag27" href="#note27">27</a></p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig225" id="fig225"> </a>
<img src="images/fig225.jpg" width="441" height="327"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 225.&mdash;COUNTRY HOUSE, MASSACHUSETTS.</p>

<p><b>DOMESTIC ARCHITECTURE.</b> It is in this field that the most
characteristic and original phases of American architecture
<span class="pagenum">398</span>
<a name="page398" id="page398"> </a>
are to be met with, particularly in rural and suburban residences. In
these the peculiar requirements of our varying climates and of American
domestic life have been studied and in large measure met with great
frankness and artistic appreciation. The broad staircase-hall, serving
often as a sort of family sitting-room, the piazza, and a picturesque
massing of steep roofs, have been the controlling factors in the
evolution of two or three general types which appear in infinite
variations. The material most used is wood, but this has had less
influence in the determination of form than might have been expected.
The artlessness of the planning, which is arranged to afford the maximum
of convenience rather than to conform to any traditional type, has been
the element of greatest artistic success. It has resulted in exteriors
which are the natural outgrowth of
<span class="pagenum">399</span>
<a name="page399" id="page399"> </a>
the interior arrangements, frankly expressed, without affectation of
style (Fig. 225). The resulting picturesqueness has, however, in many
cases been treated as an end instead of an incidental result, and the
affectation of picturesqueness has in such designs become as detrimental
as any affectation of style. In the internal treatment of American
houses there has also been a notable artistic advance, harmony of color
and domestic comfort and luxury being sought after rather than
monumental effects. A&nbsp;number of large city and country houses
designed on a palatial scale have, however, given opportunity for a more
elaborate architecture; notably the Vanderbilt, Villard, and Huntington
residences at New York, the great country-seat of <b>Biltmore</b>, near
Asheville (N.C.), in the Francis&nbsp;I. style (by R.&nbsp;M. Hunt), and
many others.</p>


<p><b>OTHER BUILDINGS.</b> American architects have generally been less
successful in public, administrative, and ecclesiastical architecture
than in commercial and domestic work. The preference for small parish
churches, treated as audience-rooms rather than as places of worship,
has interfered with the development of noble types of church-buildings.
Yet there are signs of improvement; and the new <b>Cathedral</b> of
<b>St. John the Divine</b> at New York, in a modified Romanesque style,
promises to be a worthy and monumental building. In semi-public
architecture, such as hotels, theatres, clubs, and libraries, there are
many notable examples of successful design. The <b>Ponce de Leon
Hotel</b> at St. Augustine, a&nbsp;sumptuous and imposing pile in a free
version of the Spanish Plateresco; the Auditorium Theatre at Chicago,
the Madison Square Garden and the Casino at New York, may be cited as
excellent in general conception and well carried out in detail,
externally and internally. The Century and Metropolitan Clubs at New
York, the <b>Boston Public Library</b>, the Carnegie Library at
Pittsburgh, the <b>Congressional Library</b> at Washington, and the
recently
<span class="pagenum">400</span>
<a name="page400" id="page400"> </a>
completed Minnesota <b>State Capitol</b> at St. Paul, exemplify in
varying degrees of excellence the increasing capacity of American
architects for monumental design. This was further shown in the
buildings of the <b>Columbian Exposition</b> at Chicago in 1893. These,
in spite of many faults of detail, constituted an aggregate of
architectural splendor such as had never before been seen or been
possible on this side the Atlantic. They further brought architecture
into closer union with the allied arts and formed an object lesson in
the value of appropriate landscape gardening as a setting to monumental
structures.</p>

<p>It should be said, in conclusion, that with the advances of recent
years in artistic design in the United States there has been at least as
great improvement in scientific construction. The sham and flimsiness of
the Civil War period are passing away, and solid and durable building is
becoming more general throughout the country, but especially in the
Northeast and in some of the great Western cities, notably in Chicago.
In this onward movement the Federal buildings&mdash;post-offices,
custom-houses, and other governmental edifices&mdash;have not, till
lately, taken high rank. Although solidly and carefully constructed,
those built during the period 1875&ndash;1895 were generally inferior to
the best work produced by private enterprise, or by State and municipal
governments. This was in large part due to enactments devolving upon the
supervising architect at Washington the planning of all Federal
buildings, as well as a burden of supervisory and clerical duties
incompatible with the highest artistic results. Since 1898, however,
a&nbsp;more enlightened policy has prevailed, and a number of notable
designs for Federal buildings have been secured by carefully-conducted
competitions.</p>

<p class="footnote">
<a name="note27" id="note27" href="#tag27">27.</a>
See <a href="#appD">Appendix, D</a> and <a href="#appE">E</a>.</p>




<span class="pagenum">401</span>
<a name="page401" id="page401"> </a>

<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="chapXXVIII" id="chapXXVIII">CHAPTER XXVIII.</a></h3>

<h3 class="subhead">
ORIENTAL ARCHITECTURE.</h3>

<h3 class="subsub">
INDIA, CHINA, AND JAPAN.</h3>


<p class="books">
<span class="smallcaps">Books Recommended</span>: Cole, <i>Monographs
of Ancient Monuments of India</i>. Conder, <i>Notes on Japanese
Architecture</i> (in Transactions of R.I.B.A., for 1886). Cunningham,
<i>Archæological Survey of India</i>. Fergusson, <i>Indian and Eastern
Architecture</i>; <i>Picturesque Illustrations of Indian
Architecture</i>. Le Bon, <i>Les Monuments de l’Inde</i>. Morse,
<i>Japanese Houses</i>. Stirling, <i>Asiatic Researches</i>. Consult
also the <i>Journal</i> and the <i>Transactions</i> of the Royal Asiatic
Society.</p>


<p><b>INTRODUCTORY NOTE.</b> The architecture of the non-Moslem
countries and races of Asia has been reserved for this closing chapter,
in order not to interrupt the continuity of the history of European
styles, with which it has no affinity and scarcely even a point of
contact. Among them all, India alone has produced monuments of great
architectural importance. The buildings of China and Japan, although
interesting for their style, methods, and detail, and so deserving at
least of brief mention, are for the most part of moderate size and of
perishable materials. Outside of these three countries there is little
to interest the general student of architecture.</p>


<p><b>INDIA: PERIODS.</b> It is difficult to classify the non-Mohammedan
styles of India, owing to their frequently overlapping, both
geographically and artistically; while the lack of precise dates in
Indian literature makes the chronology of many of the monuments more or
less doubtful. The
<span class="pagenum">402</span>
<a name="page402" id="page402"> </a>
divisions given below are a modification of those first established by
Fergusson, and are primarily based on the three great religions, with
geographical subdivisions, as follows:</p>

<p><span class="smallroman">THE BUDDHIST STYLE</span>, from the reign
of Asoka, <i>cir.</i> 250 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, to the
7th century <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> Its monuments occupy
mainly a broad band running northeast and southwest, between the Indian
Desert and the Dekkan. Offshoots of the style are found as far north as
Gandhara, and as far south as Ceylon.</p>

<p><span class="smallroman">THE JAINA STYLE</span>, akin to the
preceding if not derived from it, covering the same territory as well as
southern India; from 1000 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> to the
present time.</p>

<p><span class="smallroman">THE BRAHMAN</span> or <span class="smallroman">HINDU STYLES</span>, extending over the whole peninsula.
They are sub-divided geographically into the <span class="smallroman">NORTHERN BRAHMAN</span>, the <span class="smallroman">CHALUKYAN</span> in the Dekkan, and the <span class="smallroman">DRAVIDIAN</span> in the south; this last style being
coterminous with the populations speaking the Tamil and cognate
languages. The monuments of these styles are mainly subsequent to the
10th century, though a few date as far back as the 7th.</p>

<p>The great majority of Indian monuments are religious&mdash;temples,
shrines, and monasteries. Secular buildings do not appear until after
the Moslem conquests, and most of them are quite modern.</p>


<p><b>GENERAL CHARACTER.</b> All these styles possess certain traits in
common. While stone and brick are both used, sandstone predominating,
the details are in large measure derived from wooden prototypes.
Structural lines are not followed in the exterior treatment, purely
decorative considerations prevailing. Ornament is equally lavished on
all parts of the building, and is bewildering in its amount and
complexity. Realistic and grotesque sculpture is freely used, forming
multiplied horizontal bands of extraordinary richness and minuteness of
execution. Spacious and lofty
<span class="pagenum">403</span>
<a name="page403" id="page403"> </a>
interiors are rarely attempted, but wonderful effects are produced by
seemingly endless repetition of columns in halls, and corridors, and by
external emphasis of important parts of the plan by lofty tower-like
piles of masonry.</p>

<p>The source of the various Indian styles, the origin of the forms
used, the history of their development, are all wrapped in obscurity.
All the monuments show a fully developed style and great command of
technical resources from the outset. When, where, and how these were
attained is as yet an unsolved mystery. In all its phases previous to
the Moslem conquest Indian architecture appears like an indigenous art,
borrowing little from foreign styles, and having no affinities with the
arts of Occidental nations.</p>


<p><b>BUDDHIST STYLE.</b> Although Buddhism originated in the sixth
century <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, the earliest
architectural remains of the style date from its wide promulgation in
India under Asoka (272&ndash;236 <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>). Buddhist monuments comprise three chief
classes of structures: the <i>stupas</i> or <i>topes</i>, which are
mounds more or less domical in shape, enclosing relic-shrines of Buddha,
or built to mark some sacred spot; <i>chaityas</i>, or temple halls, cut
in the rock; and <i>viharas</i>, or monasteries. The style of the detail
varies considerably in these three classes, but is in general simpler
and more massive than in the other styles of India.</p>


<p><b>TOPES.</b> These are found in groups, of which the most important
are at or near Bhilsa in central India, at Manikyala in the northwest,
at Amravati in the south, and in Ceylon at Ruanwalli and Tuparamaya. The
best known among them is the <b>Sanchi Tope</b>, near Bhilsa, 120 feet
in diameter and 56 feet high. It is surrounded by a richly carved stone
rail or fence, with gateways of elaborate workmanship, having three
sculptured lintels crossing the carved uprights. The tope at Manikyala
is larger, and dates from the 7th century. It is exceeded in size by
many in Ceylon, that at Abayagiri measuring 360 feet in
<span class="pagenum">404</span>
<a name="page404" id="page404"> </a>
diameter. Few of the topes retain the <i>tee</i>, or model of a shrine,
which, like a lantern, once crowned each of them.</p>

<p>Besides the topes there are a few stupas of tower-like form, square
in plan, of which the most famous is that at <b>Buddh Gaya</b>, near the
sacred Bodhi tree, where Buddha attained divine light in 588&nbsp;<span
class="smallroman">B.C.</span></p>


<p><b>CHAITYA HALLS.</b> The Buddhist speos-temples&mdash;so far as
known the only extant halls of worship of that religion, except one at
Sanchi&mdash;are mostly in the Bombay Presidency, at Ellora, Karli,
Ajunta, Nassick, and Bhaja. The earliest, that at Karli, dates from 78
<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, the latest (at Ellora),
<i>cir.</i> 600 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span> They consist
uniformly of a broad nave ending in an apse, and covered by a roof like
a barrel vault, and two narrow side aisles. In the apse is the
<i>dagoba</i> or relic-shrine, shaped like a miniature tope. The front
of the cave was originally adorned with an open-work screen or frame of
wood, while the face of the rock about the opening was carved into the
semblance of a sumptuous structural façade. Among the finest of these
caverns is that at <b>Karli</b>, whose massive columns and impressive
scale recall Egyptian models, though the resemblance is superficial and
has no historic significance. More suggestive is the affinity of many of
the columns which stand before these caves to Persian prototypes (see <a
href="#fig21">Fig.&nbsp;21</a>). It is not improbable that
both Persian and classic forms were introduced into India through the
Bactrian kingdom 250 years <span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>
Otherwise we must seek for the origin of nearly all Buddhist forms in a
pre-existing wooden architecture, now wholly perished, though its
traditions may survive in the wooden screens in the fronts of the caves.
While some of these caverns are extremely simple, as at Bhaja, others,
especially at <b>Nassick</b> and <b>Ajunta</b>, are of great splendor
and complexity.</p>


<p><b>VIHARAS.</b> Except at Gandhara in the Punjab, the structural
monasteries of the Buddhists were probably all of wood and have long ago
perished. The Gandhara monasteries
<span class="pagenum">405</span>
<a name="page405" id="page405"> </a>
of Jamalgiri and Takht-i-Bahi present in plan three or four courts
surrounded by cells. The centre of one court is in both cases occupied
by a platform for an altar or shrine. Among the ruins there have been
found a number of capitals whose strong resemblance to the Corinthian
type is now generally attributed to Byzantine rather than Bactrian
influences. These viharas may therefore be assigned to the 6th or 7th
century&nbsp;<span class="smallroman">A.D.</span></p>

<p>The rock-cut viharas are found in the neighborhood of the chaityas
already described. Architecturally, they are far more elaborate than the
chaityas. Those at Salsette, Ajunta, and Bagh are particularly
interesting, with pillared halls or courts, cells, corridors, and
shrines. The hall of the <b>Great Vihara</b> at <b>Bagh</b> is 96 feet
square, with 36 columns. Adjoining it is the school-room, and the whole
is fronted by a sumptuous rock-cut colonnade 200 feet long. These caves
were mostly hewn between the 5th and 7th centuries, at which time
sculpture was more prevalent in Buddhist works than previously, and some
of them are richly adorned with figures.</p>


<p><b>JAINA STYLE.</b> The religion and the architecture of the Jainas
so closely resemble those of the Buddhists, that recent authorities are
disposed to treat the Jaina style as a mere variation or continuation of
the Buddhist. Chronologically they are separated by an interval of some
three centuries, <i>cir.</i> 650&ndash;950 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>, which have left us almost no monuments of
either style. The Jaina is moreover easily distinguished from the
Buddhist architecture by the great number and elaborateness of its
structural monuments. The multiplication of statues of Tirthankhar in
the cells about the temple courts, the exuberance of sculpture, the use
of domes built in horizontal courses, and the imitation in stone of
wooden braces or struts are among its distinguishing features.</p>


<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig226" id="fig226"> </a>
<img src="images/fig226.jpg" width="424" height="326"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 226.&mdash;PORCH OF TEMPLE ON MOUNT ABU.</p>

<p><b>JAINA TEMPLES.</b> The earliest examples are on <b>Mount Abu</b>
<span class="pagenum">406</span>
<a name="page406" id="page406"> </a>
in the Indian Desert. Built by Vimalah Sah in 1032, the chief of these
consists of a court measuring 140 × 90 feet, surrounded by cells and a
double colonnade. In the centre rises the shrine of the god, containing
his statue, and terminating in a lofty tower or <i>sikhra</i>. An
imposing columnar porch, cruciform in plan, precedes this cell (Fig.
226). The intersection of the arms is covered by a dome supported on
eight columns with stone brackets or struts. The dome and columns are
covered with profuse carving and sculptured figures, and the total
effect is one of remarkable dignity and splendor. The temple of
<b>Sadri</b> is much more extensive, twenty minor domes and one of
larger size forming cruciform porches on all four sides of the central
<i>sikhra</i>. The cells about the court are each covered by a small
<i>sikhra</i>, and these, with the twenty-one domes (four of which are
<span class="pagenum">407</span>
<a name="page407" id="page407"> </a>
built in three stories), all grouped about the central tower and adorned
with an astonishing variety of detail, constitute a monument of the
first importance. It was built by Khumbo Rana, about 1450. At
<b>Girnar</b> are several 12th-century temples with enclosed instead of
open vestibules. One of these, that of <b>Neminatha</b>, retains intact
its court enclosure and cells, which in most other cases have perished.
The temple at <b>Somnath</b> resembles it, but is larger; the dome of
its porch, 33 feet in diameter, is the largest Jaina dome in India.
Other notable temples are at Gwalior, Khajuraho, and Parasnatha.</p>

<p>In all the Jaina temples the salient feature is the sikhra or
<i>vimana</i>. This is a tower of approximately square plan, tapering by
a graceful curve toward a peculiar terminal ornament shaped like a
flattened melon. Its whole surface is variegated by horizontal bands and
vertical breaks, covered with sculpture and carving. Next in importance
are the domes, built wholly in horizontal courses and resting on stone
lintels carried by bracketed columns. These same traits appear in
relatively modern examples, as at Delhi.</p>


<p class="illustration float w150">
<a name="fig227" id="fig227"> </a>
<img src="images/fig227.jpg" width="148" height="497"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 227.&mdash;TOWER OF VICTORY, CHITTORE.</p>

<p><b>TOWERS.</b> A similar predilection for minutely broken surfaces
marks the towers which sometimes adjoin the temples, as at Chittore
(tower of <b>Sri Allat</b>, 13th century), or were erected as trophies
of victory, like that of <b>Khumbo Rana</b> in
<span class="pagenum">408</span>
<a name="page408" id="page408"> </a>
the same town (Fig. 227). The combination of horizontal and vertical
lines, the distribution of the openings, and the rich ornamentation of
these towers are very interesting, though lacking somewhat in structural
propriety of design.</p>


<p><b>HINDU STYLES: NORTHERN BRAHMAN.</b> The origin of this style is as
yet an unsolved problem. Its monuments were mainly built between 600 and
1200 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>, the oldest being in Orissa,
at Bhuwanesevar, Kanaruk, and Puri. In northern India the temples are
about equally divided between the two forms of Brahmanism&mdash;the
worship of Vishnu or <i>Vaishnavism</i>, and that of Siva or
<i>Shaivism</i>&mdash;and do not differ materially in style. As in the
Jaina style, the <i>vimana</i> is their most striking feature, and this
is in most cases adorned with numerous reduced copies of its own form
grouped in successive stages against its sides and angles. This curious
system of design appears in nearly all the great temples, both of Vishnu
and Siva. The Jaina melon ornament is universal, surmounted generally by
an urn-shaped finial.</p>

<p>In plan the vimana shrine is preceded by two or three chambers,
square or polygonal, some with and some without columns. The foremost of
these is covered by a roof formed like a stepped pyramid set cornerwise.
The fine porch of the ruined temple at <b>Bindrabun</b> is cruciform in
plan and forms the chief part of the building, the shrine at the further
end being relatively small and its tower unfinished or ruined. In some
modern examples the antechamber is replaced by an open porch with a
Saracenic dome, as at Benares; in others the old type is completely
abandoned, as in the temple at <b>Kantonnuggur</b> (1704&ndash;22). This
is a square hall built of terra-cotta, with four three-arched porches
and nine towers, more Saracenic than Brahman in general aspect.</p>

<p>The <b>Kandarya Mahadeo</b>, at Khajuraho, is the most noted example
of the northern Brahman style, and one of the most splendid structures
extant. A&nbsp;strong and lofty basement
<span class="pagenum">409</span>
<a name="page409" id="page409"> </a>
supports an extraordinary mass of roofs, covering the six open porches
and the antechamber and hypostyle hall, which precede the shrine, and
rising in successive pyramidal masses until the vimana is reached which
covers the shrine. This is 116 feet high, but seems much loftier, by
reason of the small scale of its constituent parts and the marvellously
minute decoration which covers the whole structure. The vigor of its
masses and the grand stairways which lead up to it give it a dignity
unusual for its size, 60 × 109 feet in plan (<i>cir.</i> 1000 <span
class="smallroman">A.D.</span>).</p>

<p>At Puri, in Orissa, the <b>Temple</b> of <b>Jugganat</b>, with its
double enclosure and numerous subordinate shrines, the Teli-ka-Mandir at
Gwalior, and temples at <b>Udaipur</b> near Bhilsa, at <b>Mukteswara</b>
in Orissa, at Chittore, Benares, and Barolli, are important examples.
The few tombs erected subsequent to the Moslem conquest, combining Jaina
bracket columns with Saracenic domes, and picturesquely situated palaces
at Chittore (1450), Oudeypore (1580), and Gwalior, should also be
mentioned.</p>


<p><b>CHALUKYAN STYLE.</b> Throughout a central zone crossing the
peninsula from sea to sea about the Dekkan, and extending south to
Mysore on the west, the Brahmans developed a distinct style during the
later centuries of the Chalukyan dynasty. Its monuments are mainly
comprised between 1050 and the Mohammedan conquest in 1310. The most
notable examples of the style are found along the southwest coast, at
Hullabid, Baillur, and Somnathpur.</p>


<p class="illustration float">
<a name="fig228" id="fig228"> </a>
<img src="images/fig228.jpg" width="259" height="407"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 228.&mdash;TEMPLE AT HULLABÎD. DETAIL.</p>

<p><b>TEMPLES.</b> Chalukyan architecture is exclusively religious and
its temples are easily recognized. The plans comprise the same elements
as those of the Jainas, but the Chalukyan shrine is always star-shaped
externally in plan, and the vimana takes the form of a stepped pyramid
instead of a curved outline. The Jaina dome is, moreover, wholly
wanting. All the details are of extraordinary richness and beauty, and
the breaking up of the surfaces by rectangular
<span class="pagenum">410</span>
<a name="page410" id="page410"> </a>
projections is skilfully managed so as to produce an effect of great
apparent size with very moderate dimensions. All the known examples
stand on raised platforms, adding materially to their dignity. Some are
double temples, as at Hullabid (Fig. 228); others are triple in plan.
A&nbsp;noticeable feature of the style is the deeply cut stratification
of the lower part of the temples, each band or stratum bearing a
distinct frieze of animals, figures or ornament, carved with masterly
skill. Pierced stone slabs filling the window openings are also not
uncommon.</p>

<p>The richest exemplars of the style are the temples at <b>Baillur</b>
and Somnathpur, and at Hullabîd the <b>Kait Iswara</b> and the
incomplete <b>Double Temple</b>. The Kurti Stambha, or gate at Worangul,
and the Great Temple at <b>Hamoncondah</b> should also be mentioned.</p>


<p><b>DRAVIDIAN STYLE.</b> The Brahman monuments of southern India
exhibit a style almost as strongly marked as the Chalukyan. This appears
less in their details than in their general plan and conception. The
Dravidian temples are not single structures, but aggregations of
buildings of varied size and form, covering extensive areas enclosed by
walls
<span class="pagenum">411</span>
<a name="page411" id="page411"> </a>
and entered through gates made imposing by lofty pylons called
<i>gopuras</i>. As if to emphasize these superficial resemblances to
Egyptian models, the sanctuary is often low and insignificant. It is
preceded by much more imposing porches (<i>mantapas</i>) and hypostyle
halls or <i>choultries</i>, the latter being sometimes of extraordinary
extent, though seldom lofty. The choultrie, sometimes called the Hall of
1,000 Columns, is in some cases replaced by pillared corridors of great
length and splendor, as at <b>Ramisseram</b> and <b>Madura.</b> The
plans are in most cases wholly irregular, and the architecture, so far
from resembling the Egyptian in its scale and massiveness, is marked by
the utmost minuteness of ornament and tenuity of detail, suggesting wood
and stucco rather than stone. The <b>Great Hall</b> at Chillambaram is
but 10 to 12 feet high, and the corridors at Ramisseram, 700 feet long,
are but 30 feet high. The effect of <i>ensemble</i> of the Dravidian
temples is disappointing. They lack the emphasis of dominant masses and
the dignity of symmetrical and logical arrangement. The very loftiness
of the gopuras makes the buildings of the group within seem low by
contrast. In nearly every temple, however, some one feature attracts
merited admiration by its splendor, extent, or beauty. Such are the
<b>Choultrie</b>, built by Tirumalla Nayak at Madura (1623&ndash;45),
measuring 333 × 105 feet; the corridors already mentioned at Ramisseram
and in the <b>Great Temple</b> at Madura; the gopuras at <b>Tarputry</b>
and Vellore, and the <b>Mantapa</b> of <b>Parvati</b> at Chillambaram
(1595&ndash;1685). Very noticeable are the compound columns of this
style, consisting of square piers with slender shafts coupled to them
and supporting brackets, as at Chillambaram, Peroor, and Vellore; the
richly banded square piers, the grotesques of rampant horses and
monsters, and the endless labor bestowed upon minute carving and
ornament in superposed bands.</p>


<p><b>OTHER MONUMENTS.</b> Other important temples are at Tiruvalur,
Seringham, Tinevelly, and Conjeveram, all alike
<span class="pagenum">412</span>
<a name="page412" id="page412"> </a>
in general scheme of design, with enclosures varying from 300 to 1,000
feet in length and width. At <b>Tanjore</b> is a magnificent temple with
two courts, in the larger of which stands a <i>pagoda</i> or shrine with
a pyramidal vimana, unusual in Dravidian temples, and beside it the
smaller <b>Shrine</b> of <b>Soubramanya</b> (Fig. 229), a&nbsp;structure
of unusual beauty of detail. In both, the vertical lower story with its
pilasters and windows is curiously suggestive of Renaissance design. The
pagoda dates from the 14th, the smaller temple from the 15th
century.</p>

<p class="illustration">
<a name="fig229" id="fig229"> </a>
<img src="images/fig229.jpg" width="431" height="429"
alt="see caption and text"><br>
FIG. 229.&mdash;SHRINE OF SOUBRAMANYA, TANJORE.</p>


<p><b>ROCK-CUT RATHS.</b> All the above temples were built subsequently
to the 12th century. The rock-cut shrines date in some cases as far back
as the 7th century; they are called <i>kylas</i> and <i>raths</i>, and
are not caves, but isolated edifices,
<span class="pagenum">413</span>
<a name="page413" id="page413"> </a>
imitating structural designs, but hewn bodily from the rock. Those at
Mahavellipore are of diminutive size; but at <b>Purudkul</b> there is an
extensive temple with shrine, choultrie, and gopura surrounded by a
court enclosure measuring 250 × 150 feet (9th century). More famous
still is the elaborate <b>Kylas</b> at <b>Ellora</b>, of about the same
size as the above, but more complex and complete in its details.</p>


<p><b>PALACES.</b> At Madura, Tanjore, and Vijayanagar are Dravidian
palaces, built after the Mohammedan conquest and in a mixed style. The
domical octagonal throne-room and the <b>Great Hall</b> at Madura (17th
century), the most famous edifices of the kind, were evidently inspired
from Gothic models, but how this came about is not known. The Great Hall
with its pointed arched barrel vault of 67 feet span, its cusped arches,
round piers, vaulting shafts, and triforium, appears strangely foreign
to its surroundings.</p>


<p><b>CAMBODIA.</b> The subject of Indian architecture cannot be
dismissed without at least brief mention of the immense temple of
<b>Nakhon Wat</b> in Cambodia. This stupendous creation covers an area
of a full square mile, with its concentric courts, its encircling moat
or lake, its causeways, porches, and shrines, dominated by a central
structure 200 feet square with nine pagoda-like towers. The corridors
around the inner court have square piers of almost classic Roman type.
The rich carving, the perfect masonry, and the admirable composition of
the whole leading up to the central mass, indicate architectural ability
of a high order.</p>


<p><b>CHINESE ARCHITECTURE.</b> No purely Mongolian nation appears ever
to have erected buildings of first-rate importance. It cannot be denied,
however, that the Chinese are possessed of considerable decorative skill
and mechanical ingenuity; and these qualities are the most prominent
elements in their buildings. Great size and splendor, massiveness and
originality of construction, they do not possess. Built in large measure
of wood, cleverly framed and decorated
<span class="pagenum">414</span>
<a name="page414" id="page414"> </a>
with a certain richness of color and ornament, with a large element of
the grotesque in the decoration, the Chinese temples, pagodas, and
palaces are interesting rather than impressive. There is not a single
architectural monument of imposing size or of great antiquity, so far as
we know. The celebrated <b>Porcelain Tower</b> of Nankin is no longer
extant, having been destroyed in the Tæping rebellion in 1850. It was a
nine-storied polygonal pagoda 236 feet high, revetted with porcelain
tiles, and was built in 1412. The largest of Chinese temples, that of
the <b>Great Dragon</b> at Pekin, is a circular structure of moderate
size, though its enclosure is nearly a mile square. Pagodas with
diminishing stories, elaborately carved entrance gates and successive
terraces are mainly relied upon for effect. They show little structural
art, but much clever ornament. Like the monasteries and the vast
<i>lamaseries</i> of Thibet, they belong to the Buddhist religion.</p>

<p>Aside from the ingenious framing and bracketing of the carpentry, the
most striking peculiarity of Chinese buildings is their broad-spreading
tiled roofs. These invariably slope downward in a curve, and the tiling,
with its hip-ridges, crestings, and finials in terra-cotta or metal,
adds materially to the picturesqueness of the general effect. Color and
gilding are freely used, and in some cases&mdash;as in a summer pavilion
at Pekin&mdash;porcelain tiling covers the walls, with brilliant effect.
The chief wonder is that this resource of the architectural decorator
has not been further developed in China, where porcelain and earthenware
are otherwise treated with such remarkable skill.</p>


<p><b>JAPANESE ARCHITECTURE.</b> Apparently associated in race with the
Chinese and Koreans, the Japanese are far more artistic in temperament
than either of their neighbors. The refinement and originality of their
decorative art have given it a wide reputation. Unfortunately the
prevalence of earthquakes has combined with the influence of the
traditional
<span class="pagenum">415</span>
<a name="page415" id="page415"> </a>
habits of the people to prevent the maturing of a truly monumental
architecture. Except for the terraces, gates, and enclosures of their
palaces and temples, wood is the predominant building material. It is
used substantially as in China, the framing, dovetailing, bracketing,
broad eaves and tiled roofs of Japan closely resembling those of China.
The chief difference is in the greater refinement and delicacy of the
Japanese details and the more monumental disposition of the temple
terraces, the beauty of which is greatly enhanced by skillful landscape
gardening. The gateways recall somewhat those of the Sanchi Tope in
India (<a href="#page403">p.&nbsp;403</a>), but are commonly of wood.
Owing to the danger from earthquakes, lofty towers and pagodas are
rarely seen.</p>

<p>The domestic architecture of Japan, though interesting for its
arrangements, and for its sensible and artistic use of the most flimsy
materials, is too trivial in scale, detail, and construction to receive
more than passing reference. Even the great palace at Tokio,<a class="tag" name="tag28" id="tag28" href="#note28">28</a> covering an
immense area, is almost entirely composed of one-storied buildings of
wood, with little of splendor or architectural dignity.</p>

<div class="monuments">
<p><b>MONUMENTS</b> (additional to those in text). <span class="smallroman">BUDDHIST</span>: Topes at Sanchi, Sonari, Satdara, Andher,
in Central India; at Sarnath, near Benares; at Jelalabad and Salsette;
in Ceylon at Anuradhapura, Tuparamaya, Lankaramaya.&mdash;Grotto temples
(chaityas), mainly in Bombay and Bengal Presidencies; at Behar,
especially the Lomash Rishi, and Cuttack; at Bhaja, Bedsa, Ajunta, and
Ellora (Wiswakarma Cave); in Salsette, the Kenheri Cave.&mdash;Viharas:
Structural at Nalanda and Sarnath, demolished; rock-cut in Bengal, at
Cuttack, Udayagiri (the Ganesa); in the west, many at Ajunta, also at
Bagh, Bedsa, Bhaja, Nassick (the Nahapana, Vadnya Sri, etc.), Salsette,
Ellora (the Dekrivaria, etc.). In Nepâl, stupas of Swayanbunath and
Bouddhama.</p>

<p><span class="smallroman">JAINA</span>: Temples at Aiwulli, Kanaruc
(Black Pagoda), and Purudkul;
<span class="pagenum">416</span>
<a name="page416" id="page416"> </a>
groups of temples at Palitana, Gimar, Mount Abu, Somnath, Parisnath; the
Sas Bahu at Gwalior, 1093; Parswanatha and Ganthai (650) at Khajuraho;
temple at Gyraspore, 7th century; modern temples at Ahmedabad
(Huttising), Delhi, and Sonaghur; in the south at Moodbidri, Sravana
Belgula; towers at Chittore.</p>

<p><span class="smallroman">NORTHERN BRAHMAN</span>: Temples,
Parasumareswara (500 <span class="smallroman">A.D.</span>),
Mukteswara, and Great Temple (600&ndash;650), all at Bhuwaneswar, among
many others; of Papanatha at Purudkul; grotto temples at Dhumnar,
Ellora, and Poonah; temples at Chandravati, Udaipur, and Amritsur (the
last modern); tombs of Singram Sing and others at Oudeypore; of Rajah
Baktawar at Ulwar, and others at Goverdhun; ghâts or landings at Benares
and elsewhere.</p>

<p><span class="smallroman">CHALUKYAN</span>: Temples at Buchropully
and Hamoncondah, 1163; ruins at Kalyani; grottoes of Hazar Khutri.</p>

<p><span class="smallroman">DRAVIDIAN</span>: Rock-cut temples (raths)
at Mahavellipore; Tiger Cave at Saluvan Kuppan; temples at Pittadkul
(Purudkul), Tiruvalur, Combaconum, Vellore, Peroor, Vijayanagar;
pavilions at Tanjore and Vijayanagar.</p>

<p>There are also many temples in the Kashmir Valley difficult of
assignment to any of the above styles and religions.</p>
</div>

<p class="footnote">
<a name="note28" id="note28" href="#tag28">28.</a>
See Transactions R.I.B.A., 52d year, 1886, article by R.&nbsp;J. Conder,
pp. 185&ndash;214.</p>




<span class="pagenum">417</span>
<a name="page417" id="page417"> </a>
<h3 class="chapter">
<a name="appendix" id="appendix">APPENDIX.</a></h3>

<p><a name="appA">A.</a> <b>PRIMITIVE GREEK
ARCHITECTURE.</b>&mdash;The researches of Schliemann commented by
Schuchardt, of Dörpfeld, Stamakis, Tsoundas, Perrot, and others, in
Troy, Mycenæ, and Tiryns, and the more recent discoveries of Evans at
Gnossus, in Crete, have greatly extended our knowledge of the
prehistoric art of Greece and the Mediterranean basin, and established
many points of contact on the one hand with ancient Egyptian and
Phœnician art, and on the other, with the art of historic Greece. They
have proved the existence of an active and flourishing commerce between
Egypt and the Mediterranean shores and Aegean islands more than 2000
<span class="smallroman">B.C.</span>, and of a flourishing material
civilization in those islands and on the mainland of Greece, borrowing
much, but not everything, from Egypt. While the origin of the Doric
order in the structural methods of the pre-Homeric architecture of
Tiryns and Mycenæ, as set forth by Dörpfeld and by Perrot and Chipiez,
can hardly be regarded as proved in all details, since much of the
argument advanced for this derivation rests on more or less conjectural
restorations of the existing remains, it seems to be fairly well
established that the Doric order, and historic Greek architecture in
general, trace their genesis in large measure back in direct line to
this prehistoric art. The remarkable feature of this early architecture
is the apparently complete absence of temples. Fortifications, houses,
palaces, and tombs make up the ruins thus far discovered, and seem to
indicate clearly the derivation of the temple-type of later Greek art
from the primitive house, consisting of a hall or <i>megaron</i> with
four columns about the central hearth (whence
<span class="pagenum">418</span>
<a name="page418" id="page418"> </a>
no doubt, the atrium and peristyle of Roman houses, through their Greek
intermediary prototypes) and a porch or <i>aithousa</i>, with or without
columns <i>in antis</i>, opening directly into the <i>megaron</i>, or
indirectly through an ante-room called the <i>prodomos</i>. Here we have
the prototypes of the Greek temple <i>in antis</i>, with its <i>naos</i>
having interior columns, whether roofed over or hypæthral (see pp. 54,
55). It is probable also that the evidently liberal use of timber for
many of the structural details led in time to many of the forms later
developed in stone in the entablature of the Doric order. But it is hard
to discover, as Dörpfeld would have it, in the slender Mycenæan columns
with their inverted taper, the prototype of the massive Doric column
with its upward taper. The Mycenæan column was evidently derived from
wooden models; the sturdy Doric column&mdash;the earliest being the most
massive&mdash;seems plainly derived from stone or rubble piers (see <a
href="#page50">p.&nbsp;50</a>), and thus to have come from a
different source from the Mycenæan forms.</p>

<p>The <i>gynecæum</i>, or women’s apartments, the men’s apartments, and
the bath were in these ancient palaces grouped in varying relations
about the <i>megaron</i>: their plan, purpose, and arrangement are
clearly revealed in the ruins of Tiryns, where they are more complete
and perfect than either at Troy or Mycenæ.</p>


<p><a name="appB">B.</a> <b>CAMPANILES IN
ITALY.</b>&mdash;Reference is made on <a href="#page264">page 264</a> to the towers or campaniles of the
Italian Gothic style and period, and six of these are specifically
mentioned; and on <a href="#page305">page 305</a> mention is also made
of those of the Renaissance in Italy. The number and importance of the
Italian campaniles and the interest attaching to their origin and
design, warrant a more extended notice than has been assigned them in
the pages cited.</p>

<p>The oldest of these bell-towers appear to be those adjoining
<span class="pagenum">419</span>
<a name="page419" id="page419"> </a>
the two churches of San Apollinare in and near Ravenna (see <a href="#page114">p.&nbsp;114</a>), and date presumably from the
sixth century. They are plain circular towers with few and small
openings, except in the uppermost story, where larger arched openings
permit the issue of the sound of the bells. This type, which might have
been developed into a very interesting form of tower, does not seem to
have been imitated. It was at Rome, and not till the ninth or tenth
century, that the campanile became a recognized feature of church
architecture. It was invariably treated as a structure distinct from the
church, and was built of brick upon a square plan, rising with little or
no architectural adornment to a height usually of a hundred feet or
more, and furnished with but a few small openings below the belfry
stage, where a pair of coupled arched windows separated by a simple
column opened from each face of the tower. Above these windows a
pyramidal roof of low pitch terminated the tower. In spite of their
simplicity of design these Roman bell-towers often possess a noticeable
grace of proportions, and furnish the prototype of many of the more
elaborate campaniles erected during the Middle Ages in other central and
north Italian cities. The towers of Sta. Maria in Cosmedin, Sta. Maria
in Trastevere, and S.&nbsp;Giorgio in Velabro are examples of this type.
Most of the Roman examples date from the eleventh and twelfth
centuries.</p>

<p>In other cities, the campanile was treated with some variety of form
and decoration, as well as of material. In Lombardy and Venetia the
square red-brick shaft of the tower is often adorned with long, narrow
pilaster strips, as at Piacenza (p.&nbsp;158, <a href="#fig91">Fig.&nbsp;91</a>) and Venice, and an arcaded cornice
not infrequently crowns the structure. The openings at the top may be
three or four in number on each face, and even the plan is sometimes
octagonal or circular. The brick octagonal campanile of
<b>S.&nbsp;Gottardo</b> at Milan is one of the finest Lombard church
towers. At Verona the
<span class="pagenum">420</span>
<a name="page420" id="page420"> </a>
brick tower on the Piazza <ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘dell ’Erbe’ with misplaced apostrophe">dell’ Erbe</ins> and
that of S.&nbsp;Zeno are conspicuous; but every important town of
northern Italy possesses one or more examples of these structures dating
from the eleventh, twelfth, or thirteenth century.</p>

<p>Undoubtedly the three most noted bell-towers in Italy are those of
Venice, Pisa, and Florence. The great <b>Campanile</b> of <b>St.
Mark</b> at Venice, first begun in 874, carried higher in the twelfth
and fourteenth centuries, and finally completed in the sixteenth century
with the marble belvedere and wooden spire so familiar in pictures of
Venice, was formerly the highest of all church campaniles in Italy,
measuring approximately 325 feet to the summit. But this superb historic
monument, weakened by causes not yet at this writing fully understood,
fell in sudden ruin on the 14th of July, 1902, to the great loss not
only of Venice, but of the world of art, though fortunately without
injuring the neighboring buildings on the Piazza and Piazzetta of St.
Mark. Since then the campanile of S.&nbsp;Stefano, in the same city, has
been demolished to forestall another like disaster. The <b>Leaning
Tower</b> of Pisa (see p.&nbsp;160, <a href="#fig92">Fig.&nbsp;92</a>) dates from 1174, and is unique in
its plan and its exterior treatment with superposed arcades. Begun
apparently as a leaning tower, it seems to have increased this lean to a
dangerous point, by the settling of its foundations during construction,
as its upper stages were made to deviate slightly towards the vertical
from the inclination of the lower portion. It has always served rather
as a watch-tower and belvedere than as a bell-tower. The
<b>Campanile</b> adjoining the Duomo at <b>Florence</b> is described on
<a href="#page263">p.&nbsp;263</a> and illustrated in <a
href="#fig154">Fig.&nbsp;154</a>, and does not require
further notice here. The black-and-white banded towers of Sienna, Lucca,
and Pistoia, and the octagonal lanterns crowning those of Verona and
Mantua, also referred to in the text on <a href="#page264">p.&nbsp;264</a>, need here only be mentioned again
as illustrating the variety of treatment of these Italian towers.</p>

<span class="pagenum">421</span>
<a name="page421" id="page421"> </a>
<p>The Renaissance architects developed new types of campanile, and in
such variety that they can only be briefly referred to. Some, like a
brick tower at Perugia, are simple square towers with pilasters; more
often engaged columns and entablatures mark the several stories, and the
upper portion is treated either with an octagonal lantern or with
diminishing stages, and sometimes with a spire. Of the latter class the
best example is that of S.&nbsp;Biagio, at Montepulciano,&mdash;one of
the two designed to flank the façade of Ant. da S.&nbsp;Gallo’s
beautiful church of that name. One or two good late examples are to be
found at Naples. Of the more massive square type there are examples in
the towers of S.&nbsp;Michele, Venice; of the cathedral at Ferrara, Sta.
Chiara at Naples, and Sta. Maria dell’ Anima&mdash;one of the
earliest&mdash;at Rome. The most complete and perfect of these square
belfries of the Renaissance is that of the <b>Campidoglio</b> at Rome,
by Martino Lunghi, dating from the end of the sixteenth century, which
groups so admirably with the palaces of the Capitol.</p>


<p><a name="appC" id="appC">C.</a> <b>BRAMANTE’S WORKS.</b>&mdash;A
more or less animated controversy has arisen regarding the authenticity
of many of the works attributed to Bramante, and the tendency has of
late been to deny him any part whatever in several of the most important
of these works. The first of these to be given a changed assignment was
the church of the Consolazione at Todi (<a href="#page293">p.&nbsp;293</a>), now believed to be by Cola di Caprarola;
and it is now denied by many investigators that either the Cancelleria
or the Giraud palace (<a href="#page290">p.&nbsp;290</a>) is his work,
or any one of two or three smaller houses in Rome showing a somewhat
similar architectural treatment. The evidence adduced in support of this
denial is rather speculative and critical than documentary, but is not
without weight. The date 1495 carved on a doorway of the Cancelleria
palace is thought to forbid its attribution to
<span class="pagenum">422</span>
<a name="page422" id="page422"> </a>
Bramante, who is not known to have come to Rome till 1503; and there is
a lack of positive evidence of his authorship of the Giraud palace and
the other houses which seem to be by the same hand as the Cancelleria.
To the advocates of this view there is not enough resemblance in style
between this group of buildings and his acknowledged work either in
Milan or in the Vatican to warrant their being attributed to him.</p>

<p>It must, however, be remarked, that this notable group of works,
stamped with the marks and even the mannerisms of a strong personality,
reveal in their unknown author gifts amounting to genius, and heretofore
deemed not unworthy of Bramante. It is almost inconceivable that they
should have been designed by a mere beginner previously utterly unknown
and forgotten soon after. It is incumbent upon those who deny the
attribution to Bramante to find another name, if possible, on which to
fasten the credit of these works. Accordingly, they have been variously
attributed to Alberti (who died in 1472) or his followers; to Bernardo
di Lorenzo, and to other later fifteenth-century artists. The difficulty
here is to discover any name that fits the conditions even as well as
Bramante’s; for the supposed author must have been in Rome between 1495
and 1505, and his other works must be at least as much like these as
were Bramante’s. No name has thus far been found satisfactory to careful
critics; and the alternative theory, that there existed in Rome, before
Bramante’s coming, a&nbsp;group of architects unknown to later fame,
working in a common style and capable of such a masterpiece as the
Cancelleria, does not harmonize with the generally accepted facts of
Renaissance art history. Moreover, the comparison of these works with
Bramante’s Milanese work on the one hand and his great Court of the
Belvedere in the Vatican on the other, yields, to some critics,
conclusions quite opposed to those of the advocates of another
authorship than Bramante’s.</p>

<span class="pagenum">423</span>
<a name="page423" id="page423"> </a>
<p>The controversy must be considered for the present as still open.
There are manifest difficulties with either of the two opposed views,
and these can hardly be eliminated, except by the discovery of documents
not now known to exist, whose testimony will be recognized as
unimpeachable.</p>


<p><a name="appD" id="appD">D.</a> <b>L’ART NOUVEAU.</b>&mdash;Since
1896, and particularly since the Paris Exposition of 1900,
a&nbsp;movement has manifested itself in France and Belgium, and spread
to Germany and Austria and even measurably to England, looking towards a
more personal and original style of decorative and architectural design,
in which the traditions and historic styles of the past shall be
ignored. This movement has received from its adherents and the public
the name of “L’Art Nouveau,” or, according to some, “L’Art Moderne”; but
this name must not be held to connote either a really new style or a
fundamentally new principle in art. Indeed, it may be questioned whether
any clearly-defined body of principles whatever underlies the movement,
or would be acknowledged equally by all its adherents. It appears to be
a reaction against a too slavish adherence to traditional forms and
methods of design (see pp. <a href="#page370">370</a>, <a href="#page375">375</a>), a&nbsp;striving to ignore or forget the past rather
than a reaching out after any well-understood, positive end; as such, it
possesses the negative strength of protest rather than the affirmative
strength of a vital principle. Its lack of cohesion is seen in the
division of its adherents into groups, some looking to nature for
inspiration, while others decry this as a mistaken quest; some seeking
to emphasize structural lines, and others to ignore them altogether.
All, however, are united in the avoidance of commonplace forms and
historic styles, and this preoccupation has developed an amazing amount
of originality and individualism of style, frequently reaching the
extreme of eccentricity. The results have therefore been, as might be
expected, extremely varied in
<span class="pagenum">424</span>
<a name="page424" id="page424"> </a>
merit, ranging from the most refined and reserved in style to the most
harshly bizarre and extravagant. As a rule, they have been most
successful in small and semi-decorative objects&mdash;jewelry,
silverware, vases, and small furniture; and one most desirable feature
of the movement has been the stimulus it has given (especially in France
and England), to the organization and activity of “arts-and-crafts”
societies which occupy themselves with the encouragement of the
decorative and industrial arts and the diffusion of an improved taste.
In the field of the larger objects of design, in which the dominance of
traditional form and of structural considerations is proportionally more
imperious, the struggle to evade these restrictions becomes more
difficult, and results usually in more obvious and disagreeable
eccentricities, which the greater size and permanence of the object tend
further to exaggerate. The least successful achievements of the movement
have accordingly been in architecture. The buildings designed by its
most fervent disciples (<i>e.g.</i> the Pavillon Bleu at the Exposition
of 1900, the Castel Béranger, Paris, by <i>H.&nbsp;Guimard</i>, the
houses of the artist colony at Darmstadt, and others) are for the most
part characterized by extreme stiffness, eccentricity, or ugliness. The
requirements of construction and of human habitation cannot easily be
met without sometimes using the forms which past experience has
developed for the same ends; and the negation of precedent is not the
surest path to beauty or even reasonableness of design. It is
interesting to notice that in the intermediate field of furniture-design
some of the best French productions recall the style of Louis XV.,
modified by Japanese ideas and spirit. This singular but not unpleasing
combination is less surprising when we reflect that the style of Louis
XV. was itself a protest against the formalism of the heavy classic
architecture of preceding reigns, and achieved its highest successes in
the domain of furniture and interior decoration.</p>

<span class="pagenum">425</span>
<a name="page425" id="page425"> </a>
<p>It may be fair to credit the new movement with one positive
characteristic in its prevalent regard for line, especially for the
effect of long and swaying lines, whether in the contours or
ornamentation of an object. This is especially noticeable in the Belgian
work, and in that of the Viennese “Secessionists,” who have, however,
carried eccentricity to a further point of extravagance than any
others.</p>

<p>Whether “L’Art Nouveau” will ever produce permanent results time
alone can show. Its present vogue is probably evanescent and it cannot
claim to have produced a style; but it seems likely to exert on European
architecture an influence, direct and indirect, not unlike that of the
Néo-Grec movement of 1830 in France (<a href="#page364">p.&nbsp;364</a>), but even more lasting and beneficial. It
has already begun to break the hold of rigid classical tradition in
design; and recent buildings, especially in Germany and Austria, like
the works of the brilliant <i>Otto Wagner</i> in Vienna, show a pleasing
freedom of personal touch without undue striving after eccentric
novelty. Doubtless in French and other European architecture the same
result will in time manifest itself.</p>

<p>The search for novelty and the desire to dispense wholly with
historic forms of design which are the chief marks of the Art <ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘Noveau’">Nouveau</ins>, were
emphatically displayed in many of the remarkable buildings of the Paris
<b>Exhibition of 1900</b>, in which a striking fertility and facility of
design in the decorative details made more conspicuous the failure to
improve upon the established precedents of architectural style in the
matters of proportion, scale, general composition, and contour. As usual
the metallic construction of these buildings was almost without
exception admirable, and the decorative details, taken by themselves,
extremely clever and often beautiful, but the combined result was not
satisfactory.</p>

<p>In the United States the movement has not found a firm foothold
because there has been no dominant, enslaving tradition to protest
against. Not a few of the ideas, not a
<span class="pagenum">426</span>
<a name="page426" id="page426"> </a>
little of the spirit of the movement may be recognized in the work of
individual architects and decorative artists in the United States,
executed years before the movement took recognizable form in Europe: and
American decorative design has generally been, at least since 1880 or
1885, sufficiently free, individual and personal, to render unnecessary
and impossible any concerted movement of artistic revolt against slavery
to precedent.</p>


<p><a name="appE" id="appE">E.</a> <b>RECENT AMERICAN
ARCHITECTURE.</b>&mdash;Architectural activity in the United States
continues to share in the general prosperity which has marked the years
since 1898, and this activity has by no means been confined to
industrial and commercial architecture. Indeed, while the erection of
“sky scrapers” or excessively lofty office-buildings has continued to be
a feature of this activity in the great commercial centres, the most
notable architectural enterprises of recent years have been in the field
of educational buildings, both in the East and West. In 1898 a great
international competition resulted in the selection of the design of Mr.
<i>E.&nbsp;Bénard</i> of Paris for a magnificent group of buildings for
the <b>University of California</b> on a scale of unexampled grandeur,
and the erection of this colossal project has been begun. An almost
equally ambitious project, by a firm of Philadelphia architects, has
been adopted for the Washington University at St. Louis; and many other
universities and colleges have either added extensively to their
existing buildings or planned an entire rebuilding on new designs. Among
these the national military and naval academies at <b>West Point</b> and
<b>Annapolis</b> take the first rank in the extent and splendor of the
projected improvements. Museums and libraries have also been erected or
begun in various cities, and the <b>New York Public Library</b>, now
building, will rank in cost and beauty with those already erected in
Boston and Washington.</p>

<span class="pagenum">427</span>
<a name="page427" id="page427"> </a>
<p>In other departments mention should be made of recent Federal
buildings (custom-houses, post-offices, and court-houses) erected under
the provisions of the Tarsney act from designs secured by competition
among the leading architects of the country; among those the <b>New York
Custom House</b> is the most important, but other buildings, at
Washington, Indianapolis, and elsewhere, are also conspicuous, and many
of them worthy of high praise. The tendency to award the designing of
important public buildings, such as State capitols, county court houses,
city halls, libraries, and hospitals, by competition instead of by
personal and political favor, has resulted in a marked improvement in
the quality of American public architecture.</p>

<p><a name="appF">F.</a> <b>THE ERECHTHEUM: RECENT
INVESTIGATIONS.</b>&mdash;During the past two years, extensive repairs
and partial restorations of the Erechtheum at Athens, undertaken by the
Greek Archæological Society, have afforded opportunities for a new and
thoroughgoing study of the existing portions of the building and of the
surrounding ruins. In these investigations a prominent part has been
borne by Mr. Gorham P.&nbsp;Stevens, representing the Archæological
Institute of America, to whom must be credited, among other things, the
demonstration of the existence, in the east wall of the original
structure, of two windows previously unknown. Other peculiarities of
design and construction were also discovered, which add greatly to the
interest of the building. These investigations are reported in the
<i>American Journal of Archæology</i>, Second Series; <i>Journal of the
Archæological Institute of America</i>, Vol.&nbsp;X., No.&nbsp;1, <i>et
seq.</i> The illustrations, Figures 35 and 36, are, by Mr. Stevens’
courtesy, based upon, though not reproductions of, his original
drawings.</p>

</div> <!-- end div maintext -->

<a name="page428" id="page428"> </a>


<hr class="mid">

<hr>

<hr class="mid">

<div class="maintext">

<span class="pagenum">429</span>
<a name="page429" id="page429"> </a>

<h3><a name="glossary" id="glossary">
GLOSSARY</a><br>
<span class="smaller">
OF TERMS NOT DEFINED IN THE TEXT.</span></h3>

<div class="hanging">

<p><span class="smallcaps">Alcazar</span> (Span., from Arabic <i>Al
Kasr</i>), a&nbsp;palace or castle, especially of a governing
official.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Archivolt</span>, a band or group of
mouldings decorating the wall-face of an arch; or a transverse arch
projecting slightly from the surface of a barrel or groined vault.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Astylar</span>, without columns.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Balnea</span>, a Roman bathing establishment,
less extensive than the <i>thermæ</i>.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bel Etage</span>, the principal story of a
building, containing the reception rooms and saloons; usually the second
story (first above the ground story).</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Broken Entablature</span>, an entablature
which projects forward over each column or pilaster, returning back to
the wall and running along with diminished projection between the
columns, as in the Arch of Constantine (<a href="#fig63">Fig.&nbsp;63</a>).</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Cantoned Piers</span>, piers adorned with
columns or pilasters at the corners or on the outer faces.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cartouche</span> (Fr.), an ornament shaped
like a shield or oval. In Egyptian hieroglyphics, the oval encircling
the name of a king.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cavetto</span>, a concave, quarter-round
moulding.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chevron</span>, a V-shaped ornament.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chryselephantine</span>, of ivory and gold;
used of statues in which the nude portions are of ivory and the
draperies of gold.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Console</span>, a large scroll-shaped
bracket or ornament, having its broadest curve at the bottom.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Corinthianesque</span>, resembling the
Corinthian; used of capitals having corner-volutes and acanthus leaves,
but combined otherwise than in the classic Corinthian type.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Empaistic</span>, made of, or overlaid with,
sheet-metal beaten or hammered into decorative patterns.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Exedræ</span>, curved seats of stone;
niches or recesses, sometimes of considerable size, provided with seats
for the public.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Fenestration</span>, the whole system or
arrangement of windows and openings in an architectural composition.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Four-part.</span> A four-part vault is a
groined vault formed by the intersection of two barrel vaults. Its
diagonal edges or <i>groins</i> divide it into four sections, triangular
in plan, each called a <i>compartment</i>.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Gigantomachia</span>, a group or composition
representing the mythical combat between the gods and the giants.</p>


<span class="pagenum">430</span>
<a name="page430" id="page430"> </a>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Half-timbered</span>, constructed with a
timber framework showing externally, and filled in with masonry or
brickwork.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Imaum</span>, imâm, a Mohammedan priest.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Kaabah</span>, the sacred shrine at Meccah,
a&nbsp;nearly cubical structure hung with black cloth.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Karafah</span>, a region in Cairo
containing the so-called tombs of the Khalifs.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Laconicum</span>, the sweat-room in a Roman
bath; usually of domical design in the larger thermæ.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Mezzanine</span>, a low, intermediate
story.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Mueddin</span>, a Mohammedan
mosque-official who calls to prayer.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Narthex</span>, a porch or vestibule running
across the front of a basilica or church.</p>

<table class="bracket" summary="paired definitions">
<tr>
<td><p class="smallcaps">Neo-Gothic,</p></td>
<td class="bracket" rowspan="2">
<p>in a style which seeks to revive and adapt or apply to modern uses
the forms of the Middle Ages.</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p class="smallcaps">Neo&#x2011;Mediæval,</p></td>
<!-- <td></td> -->
</table>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Oculus</span>, a circular opening, especially
in the crown of a dome.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Ogee Arch</span>, one composed of two
juxtaposed S-shaped or wavy curves, meeting in a point at the top.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Palæstra</span>, an establishment among the
ancient Greeks for physical training.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Pavilion</span> (Fr. <i>pavillon</i>),
ordinarily a light open structure of ornate design. As applied to
architectural composition, a&nbsp;projecting section of a façade,
usually rectangular in plan, and having its own distinct mass of
roof.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Quarry Ornament</span>, any ornament covering
a surface with two series of reticulated lines enclosing approximately
quadrangular spaces or meshes.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps"><ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘Quartrefoil’">Quatrefoil</ins></span>, with four leaves or
<i>foils</i>; composed of four arcs of circles meeting in cusps pointing
inward.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Quoins</span>, slightly projecting blocks
of stone, alternately long and short, decorating or strengthening a
corner or angle of a façade.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Revetment</span>, a veneering or
sheathing.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Rustication</span>, treatment of the
masonry with blocks having roughly broken faces, or with deeply grooved
or bevelled joints.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Soffit</span>, the under-side of an
architrave, beam, arch, or corona.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Spandril</span>, the triangular wall-space
between two contiguous arches.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Squinch</span>, a bit of conical vaulting
filling in the angles of a square so as to provide an octagonal or
circular base for a dome or lantern.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Stoa</span>, an open colonnade for public
resort.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Tepidarium</span>, the hot-water hall or
chamber of a Roman bath.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Tympanum</span>, the flat space comprised
between the horizontal and raking cornices of a pediment, or between a
lintel and the arch over&nbsp;it.</p>

<p class="space">
<span class="smallcaps">Voussoir</span>, any one of the radial stones
composing an arch.</p>

</div> <!-- end div hanging -->

</div> <!-- end div maintext -->

<div class="index arch">

<span class="pagenum">431</span>
<a name="page431" id="page431"> </a>

<h3><a name="index_arch" id="index_arch">
INDEX OF ARCHITECTS.</a></h3>

<p class="mynote note center">
<a href="#arch_A">&nbsp;A&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_B">&nbsp;B&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_C">&nbsp;C&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_D">&nbsp;D&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_E">&nbsp;E&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_F">&nbsp;F&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_G">&nbsp;G&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_H">&nbsp;H&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_I">&nbsp;I&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_J">&nbsp;J&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_K">&nbsp;K&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_L">&nbsp;L&nbsp;</a><br>
<a href="#arch_M">&nbsp;M&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_N">&nbsp;N&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_O">&nbsp;O&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_P">&nbsp;P&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_R">&nbsp;R&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_S">&nbsp;S&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_T">&nbsp;T&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_U">&nbsp;U&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_V">&nbsp;V&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_W">&nbsp;W&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#arch_Z">&nbsp;Z&nbsp;</a><br>
&nbsp;<br>
Highlighted names link back to the beginning of this Index. Page numbers
link to the referenced page.</p>

<p class="note center">
The <i>surname</i> is in all cases followed by a comma.</p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_A" id="arch_A" href="#index_arch">Abadie</a>,
<a href="#page373">373</a></p>

<p><ins class="correction" title="consistent error for ‘Adam’">Adams</ins>, Robert <a href="#page234">234</a></p>

<p>Agnolo, Baccio d’ <a href="#page291">291</a></p>

<p>Agnolo, Gabriele d’ <a href="#page287">287</a></p>

<p>Alberti, Leo Battista <a href="#page277">277</a>,
<a href="#page280">280</a></p>

<p>Alessi, Galeazzo <a href="#page299">299</a>,
<a href="#page302">302</a></p>

<p>Ammanati, Bartolomeo <a href="#page300">300</a></p>

<p>Anselm, Prior <a href="#page219">219</a></p>

<p>Anthemius of Tralles, <a href="#page127">127</a></p>

<p>Antonio, Master <a href="#page259">259</a></p>

<p>Arnold, Master <a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<p>Arnolfo di Cambio, <a href="#page162">162</a>,
<a href="#page265">265</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_B" id="arch_B" href="#index_arch">Baccio D’ Agnolo</a>,
<a href="#page291">291</a></p>

<p>Ballu, <a href="#page371">371</a>,
<a href="#page373">373</a></p>

<p>Baltard, Victor <a href="#page371">371</a></p>

<p>Barry, Sir Charles <a href="#page380">380</a></p>

<p>Bassevi, <a href="#page356">356</a></p>

<p>Battista, Juan <a href="#page351">351</a></p>

<p>Benci di Cione, <a href="#page266">266</a></p>

<p>Benedetto da Majano, <a href="#page280">280</a>,
<a href="#page281">281</a></p>

<p>Bernardo di Lorenzo, <a href="#page282">282</a></p>

<p>Bernini, Lorenzo <a href="#page295">295</a>,
<a href="#page303">303</a>,
<a href="#page319">319</a></p>

<p>Berruguete, Alonzo <a href="#page348">348</a>,
<a href="#page350">350</a></p>

<p>Bianchi, <a href="#page305">305</a></p>

<p>Bondone, Giotto di <a href="#page258">258</a>,
<a href="#page263">263</a>,
<a href="#page272">272</a></p>

<p>Boromini, Francesco <a href="#page303">303</a>,
<a href="#page304">304</a></p>

<p>Borset, <a href="#page334">334</a></p>

<p>Bramante Lazzari, <a href="#page289">289</a>,
<a href="#page290">290</a>,
<a href="#page294">294</a>,
<a href="#page295">295</a>,
<a href="#page321">321</a></p>

<p>Brandon, Richard <a href="#page378">378</a></p>

<p>Bregno, Antonio <a href="#page284">284</a></p>

<p>Brongniart, <a href="#page363">363</a></p>

<p>Brunelleschi, Filippo <a href="#page275">275</a>,
<a href="#page276">276</a>,
<a href="#page280">280</a>,
<a href="#page281">281</a>,
<a href="#page289">289</a></p>

<p>Bullant, Jean <a href="#page316">316</a>,
<a href="#page317">317</a></p>

<p>Bulfinch, Charles <a href="#page390">390</a></p>

<p>Buon, Bartolomeo <a href="#page284">284</a></p>

<p>Buonarotti, Michael Angelo <a href="#page289">289</a>,
<a href="#page292">292</a>,
<a href="#page294">294</a>,
<a href="#page295">295</a>,
<a href="#page296">296</a>,
<a href="#page299">299</a></p>

<p>Burges, William <a href="#page380">380</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_C" id="arch_C" href="#index_arch">Callicrates</a>,
<a href="#page63">63</a></p>

<p>Cambio, Arnolfo di <a href="#page162">162</a>,
<a href="#page265">265</a></p>

<p>Campbell, Colin <a href="#page333">333</a></p>

<p>Campello, <a href="#page255">255</a></p>

<p>Caprarola, Cola da <a href="#page293">293</a></p>

<p>Caprino, Meo del <a href="#page286">286</a></p>

<p>Chalgrin, <a href="#page362">362</a></p>

<p>Chambers, Sir William <a href="#page333">333</a></p>

<p>Chambiges, Pierre <a href="#page313">313</a></p>

<p>Chrismas, Gerard <a href="#page327">327</a></p>

<p>Christodoulos, <a href="#page150">150</a></p>

<p>Churriguera, <a href="#page348">348</a>,
<a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p>Cimabue, <a href="#page258">258</a></p>

<p>Civitale, Matteo <a href="#page281">281</a>,
<a href="#page283">283</a></p>

<p>Columbe, Michel <a href="#page310">310</a></p>

<p>Cortona, Domenico di <a href="#page316">316</a></p>

<p>Cossutius, <a href="#page68">68</a></p>

<p>Cronaca, <a href="#page280">280</a>,
<a href="#page291">291</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_D" id="arch_D" href="#index_arch">Dance, George</a>
<a href="#page334">334</a></p>

<p>De Brosse, Salomon <a href="#page318">318</a>,
<a href="#page319">319</a></p>

<p>De Fabris, <a href="#page261">261</a></p>

<p>De Key, Lieven <a href="#page336">336</a></p>

<p>De Keyser, Hendrik <a href="#page336">336</a></p>

<p>Della Porta, Giacomo <a href="#page292">292</a>,
<a href="#page299">299</a>,
<a href="#page300">300</a></p>

<p>Della Robbia, Luca <a href="#page281">281</a></p>

<p>De l’Orme, Philibert <a href="#page316">316</a>,
<a href="#page317">317</a></p>

<p>Déperthes, <a href="#page373">373</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">432</span>
<a name="page432" id="page432"> </a>
<p>Derrand, François <a href="#page319">319</a></p>

<p>Desiderio da Settignano, <a href="#page281">281</a></p>

<p>De Tessin, Nicodemus <a href="#page337">337</a></p>

<p>De Vriendt (or Floris), Cornelius <a href="#page334">334</a>,
<a href="#page335">335</a></p>

<p>Diego de Siloë, <a href="#page348">348</a></p>

<p>Domenico di Cortona, <a href="#page316">316</a></p>

<p>Donatello, <a href="#page275">275</a></p>

<p>Dosio, Giovanni Antonio <a href="#page291">291</a></p>

<p>Duban, Félix <a href="#page364">364</a></p>

<p>Duc, <a href="#page364">364</a>,
<a href="#page365">365</a></p>

<p>Du Cerceau, Jean Batiste <a href="#page318">318</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_E" id="arch_E" href="#index_arch">Edington</a>,
<a href="#page226">226</a></p>

<p>Emerson, William <a href="#page382">382</a></p>

<p>Enrique de Egaz, <a href="#page349">349</a></p>

<p>Erwin von Steinbach, <a href="#page241">241</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_F" id="arch_F" href="#index_arch">Fain, Pierre</a>
<a href="#page310">310</a></p>

<p>Federighi, Antonio <a href="#page282">282</a></p>

<p>Ferstel, H. von <a href="#page375">375</a></p>

<p>Fiesole, Mino da <a href="#page281">281</a></p>

<p>Filarete, Antonio <a href="#page283">283</a></p>

<p>Flitcroft, <a href="#page333">333</a></p>

<p>Floris (De Vriendt), Cornelius <a href="#page334">334</a>,
<a href="#page335">335</a></p>

<p>Fontaine, <a href="#page362">362</a></p>

<p>Fontana, Domenico <a href="#page295">295</a>,
<a href="#page299">299</a>,
<a href="#page300">300</a>,
<a href="#page304">304</a></p>

<p>Fra Giocondo, <a href="#page286">286</a></p>

<p>Fra Ristoro, <a href="#page256">256</a></p>

<p>Fra Sisto, <a href="#page256">256</a></p>

<p>Fuga, Ferdinando <a href="#page305">305</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_G" id="arch_G" href="#index_arch">Gabriel, Jacques Ange</a>
<a href="#page324">324</a>,
<a href="#page367">367</a></p>

<p>Gabriele d’Agnolo, <a href="#page287">287</a></p>

<p>Gaddi, Taddeo <a href="#page263">263</a></p>

<p>Gadyer, Pierre <a href="#page315">315</a></p>

<p>Galilei, Alessandro <a href="#page305">305</a></p>

<p>Garnier, Charles <a href="#page372">372</a></p>

<p>Gerhardt von Riel, <a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<p>Giacomo di Pietrasanta, <a href="#page286">286</a></p>

<p>Gibbs, James <a href="#page332">332</a>,
<a href="#page333">333</a>,
<a href="#page356">356</a>,
<a href="#page385">385</a></p>

<p>Giocondo, Fra <a href="#page286">286</a></p>

<p>Giotto di Bondone, <a href="#page258">258</a>,
<a href="#page263">263</a>,
<a href="#page272">272</a></p>

<p>Giuliano da Majano, <a href="#page286">286</a>,
<a href="#page287">287</a></p>

<p>Giulio Romano, <a href="#page289">289</a>,
<a href="#page292">292</a></p>

<p>Goujon, Jean <a href="#page316">316</a>,
<a href="#page321">321</a></p>

<p>Gumiel, Pedro <a href="#page349">349</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_H" id="arch_H" href="#index_arch">Hallet, Stephen (Étienne)</a>
<a href="#page389">389</a></p>

<p>Hansen, Theophil <a href="#page360">360</a></p>

<p>Have, Theodore <a href="#page327">327</a></p>

<p>Hawksmoor, <a href="#page332">332</a></p>

<p>Hendrik de Keyser, <a href="#page336">336</a></p>

<p>Henri de Narbonne, <a href="#page249">249</a></p>

<p>Henry of Gmünd, <a href="#page255">255</a></p>

<p>Herrera, Francisco <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p>Herrera, Juan d’ <a href="#page348">348</a>,
<a href="#page350">350</a>,
<a href="#page351">351</a></p>

<p>Hitorff, J. J. <a href="#page364">364</a>,
<a href="#page372">372</a></p>

<p>Hoban, Thomas <a href="#page390">390</a></p>

<p>Holbein, Hans <a href="#page327">327</a></p>

<p>Hübsch, Heinrich <a href="#page375">375</a>,
<a href="#page376">376</a></p>

<p>Hunt, Richard M. <a href="#page393">393</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_I" id="arch_I" href="#index_arch">Ictinus</a>,
<a href="#page62">62</a>,
<a href="#page63">63</a>,
<a href="#page65">65</a></p>

<p>Isodorus of Miletus, <a href="#page127">127</a></p>

<p>Ivara, Ferdinando <a href="#page352">352</a>,
<a href="#page365">365</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_J" id="arch_J" href="#index_arch">Jacobus of Meruan</a>,
<a href="#page255">255</a></p>

<p>Jansen, Bernard <a href="#page327">327</a></p>

<p>Jefferson, Thomas <a href="#page390">390</a></p>

<p>John, Master <a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<p>John of Padua, <a href="#page328">328</a></p>

<p>Jones, Inigo <a href="#page328">328</a>,
<a href="#page332">332</a>,
<a href="#page333">333</a></p>

<p>Juan Battista, <a href="#page351">351</a></p>

<p>Junckher of Cologne, <a href="#page241">241</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_K" id="arch_K" href="#index_arch">Kearsley, Dr.</a>
<a href="#page386">386</a></p>

<p>Kent, <a href="#page333">333</a></p>

<p>Klenze, Leo von <a href="#page359">359</a>,
<a href="#page360">360</a>,
<a href="#page367">367</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_L" id="arch_L" href="#index_arch">Labrouste, Henri</a>
<a href="#page364">364</a></p>

<p>Lassus, J. B. A. <a href="#page371">371</a></p>

<p>Latrobe, Benjamin H. <a href="#page389">389</a></p>

<p>Laurana, Francesco <a href="#page310">310</a></p>

<p>Laurana, Luciano <a href="#page287">287</a></p>

<p>Le Breton, Gilles <a href="#page313">313</a></p>

<p>Lefuel, Hector <a href="#page372">372</a></p>

<p>Lemercier, Jacques <a href="#page312">312</a>,
<a href="#page319">319</a>,
<a href="#page322">322</a></p>

<p>Le Nepveu, Pierre <a href="#page314">314</a></p>

<p>Lescot, Pierre <a href="#page316">316</a>,
<a href="#page321">321</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">433</span>
<a name="page433" id="page433"> </a>
<p>Le Vau (or Levau) <a href="#page320">320</a></p>

<p>Lieven de Key, <a href="#page336">336</a></p>

<p>Ligorio, Pirro <a href="#page293">293</a></p>

<p>Lippi, Annibale <a href="#page293">293</a></p>

<p>Lira, Valentino di <a href="#page343">343</a></p>

<p>Lombardi, Antonio <a href="#page284">284</a></p>

<p>Lombardi, Martino <a href="#page284">284</a></p>

<p>Lombardi, Moro <a href="#page284">284</a></p>

<p>Lombardi, Pietro <a href="#page284">284</a></p>

<p>Lombardi, Tullio <a href="#page284">284</a>,
<a href="#page293">293</a></p>

<p>Longhena, Baldassare <a href="#page304">304</a></p>

<p>Lorenzo, Bernardo di <a href="#page282">282</a></p>

<p>Louis, Victor <a href="#page362">362</a></p>

<p>Luca della Robbia, <a href="#page281">281</a></p>

<p>Lunghi, Martino (the elder) <a href="#page304">304</a>,
<a href="#page305">305</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_M" id="arch_M" href="#index_arch">Machuca</a>,
<a href="#page351">351</a></p>

<p>Maderna, Carlo <a href="#page295">295</a>,
<a href="#page303">303</a></p>

<p>Majano, Benedetto da <a href="#page280">280</a>,
<a href="#page281">281</a></p>

<p>Majano, Giuliano da <a href="#page286">286</a>,
<a href="#page287">287</a></p>

<p>Mansart, François <a href="#page322">322</a></p>

<p>Mansart, Jules Hardouin <a href="#page320">320</a>,
<a href="#page321">321</a>,
<a href="#page322">322</a></p>

<p>Marchionne, <a href="#page305">305</a></p>

<p>Marini, Giovanni <a href="#page339">339</a></p>

<p>Martino, Pietro di <a href="#page287">287</a></p>

<p>Matthew of Arras, <a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<p>Meo del Caprino, <a href="#page286">286</a></p>

<p>Meruan, Jacobus of <a href="#page255">255</a></p>

<p>Métézeau, <a href="#page318">318</a></p>

<p>Michelozzi, Michelozzo <a href="#page279">279</a>,
<a href="#page283">283</a></p>

<p>Mino da Fiesole, <a href="#page281">281</a></p>

<p>Mnesicles, <a href="#page65">65</a></p>

<p>Mullet, A. B. <a href="#page392">392</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_N" id="arch_N" href="#index_arch">Narbonne, Henri de</a>
<a href="#page249">249</a></p>

<p>Nénot, Henri P. <a href="#page374">374</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_O" id="arch_O" href="#index_arch">Ohlmüller</a>,
<a href="#page375">375</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_P" id="arch_P" href="#index_arch">Palladio, Andrea</a>
<a href="#page299">299</a>,
<a href="#page301">301</a>,
<a href="#page319">319</a>,
<a href="#page328">328</a>,
<a href="#page350">350</a></p>

<p>Percier, Charles <a href="#page362">362</a></p>

<p>Perrault, Claude <a href="#page320">320</a></p>

<p>Peruzzi, Baldassare <a href="#page289">289</a>,
<a href="#page291">291</a>,
<a href="#page292">292</a>,
<a href="#page294">294</a></p>

<p>Phidias, <a href="#page62">62</a></p>

<p>Philibert de l’Orme, <a href="#page316">316</a>,
<a href="#page317">317</a></p>

<p>Pietrasanta, Giacomo di <a href="#page286">286</a></p>

<p>Pintelli, Baccio <a href="#page286">286</a></p>

<p>Pisano, Giovanni <a href="#page260">260</a></p>

<p>Pisano, Niccolo <a href="#page272">272</a></p>

<p>Polaert, <a href="#page382">382</a></p>

<p>Poyet, <a href="#page363">363</a></p>

<p>Pugin, A. Welby <a href="#page378">378</a></p>

<p>Pythius, <a href="#page71">71</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_R" id="arch_R" href="#index_arch">Raphael Sanzio</a>,
<a href="#page289">289</a>,
<a href="#page290">290</a>,
<a href="#page291">291</a>,
<a href="#page292">292</a>,
<a href="#page293">293</a></p>

<p>Renwick, James <a href="#page391">391</a>,
<a href="#page392">392</a></p>

<p>Revett, Nicholas <a href="#page355">355</a>,
<a href="#page358">358</a></p>

<p>Richardson, Henry H. <a href="#page393">393</a>,
<a href="#page394">394</a></p>

<p>Rickman, Thomas <a href="#page378">378</a></p>

<p>Riel, Gerhardt von <a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<p>Ristoro, Fra <a href="#page256">256</a></p>

<p>Rizzio, Antonio <a href="#page284">284</a></p>

<p>Romano, Giulio <a href="#page289">289</a>,
<a href="#page292">292</a></p>

<p>Rossellini, Bernardo <a href="#page286">286</a></p>

<p>Ruiz, Fernando <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_S" id="arch_S" href="#index_arch">Salvi, Niccola</a>
<a href="#page305">305</a></p>

<p>Sammichele, Michele <a href="#page293">293</a>,
<a href="#page299">299</a>,
<a href="#page300">300</a>,
<a href="#page329">329</a></p>

<p>San Gallo, Antonio da (the Elder) <a href="#page294">294</a></p>

<p>San Gallo, Antonio da (the Younger) <a href="#page289">289</a>,
<a href="#page291">291</a>,
<a href="#page294">294</a></p>

<p>San Gallo, Giuliano da <a href="#page278">278</a>,
<a href="#page291">291</a>,
<a href="#page292">292</a>,
<a href="#page294">294</a></p>

<p>Sansovino, Giacopo Tatti <a href="#page289">289</a>,
<a href="#page293">293</a>,
<a href="#page299">299</a>,
<a href="#page300">300</a>,
<a href="#page304">304</a></p>

<p>Satyrus, <a href="#page71">71</a></p>

<p>Scamozzi, Vincenzo <a href="#page299">299</a>,
<a href="#page339">339</a></p>

<p>Schinkel, Friedrich <a href="#page358">358</a>,
<a href="#page360">360</a>,
<a href="#page376">376</a></p>

<p>Schmidt, F. <a href="#page378">378</a></p>

<p>Scott (General) <a href="#page382">382</a></p>

<p>Scott, Sir Gilbert <a href="#page380">380</a></p>

<p>Semper, Ottfried <a href="#page376">376</a></p>

<p>Sens, William of <a href="#page219">219</a></p>

<p>Servandoni, <a href="#page323">323</a></p>

<p>Settignano, Desiderio da <a href="#page281">281</a></p>

<p>Shaw, Norman <a href="#page382">382</a></p>

<p>Siccardsburg, <a href="#page376">376</a></p>

<p>Smirke, Robert <a href="#page356">356</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">434</span>
<a name="page434" id="page434"> </a>
<p>Smithson, Robert <a href="#page328">328</a></p>

<p>Soane, Sir John <a href="#page356">356</a></p>

<p>Soufflot, J. J. <a href="#page362">362</a></p>

<p>Steinbach, Erwin von <a href="#page241">241</a></p>

<p>Stella, Paolo della <a href="#page339">339</a></p>

<p>Stern, Raphael <a href="#page305">305</a>,
<a href="#page365">365</a></p>

<p>Street, George Edmund <a href="#page380">380</a></p>

<p>Stuart, James <a href="#page355">355</a>,
<a href="#page358">358</a></p>

<p>Stuhler, <a href="#page359">359</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_T" id="arch_T" href="#index_arch">Talenti, Francesco Di</a>
<a href="#page259">259</a>,
<a href="#page263">263</a></p>

<p>Talenti, Simone di <a href="#page266">266</a></p>

<p>Taylor, Robert <a href="#page334">334</a></p>

<p>Tessin, Nicodemus de <a href="#page337">337</a></p>

<p>Thomson, Alexander <a href="#page357">357</a></p>

<p>Thornton, <a href="#page389">389</a></p>

<p>Thorpe, John <a href="#page328">328</a></p>

<p>Titz, <a href="#page376">376</a></p>

<p>Torregiano, <a href="#page327">327</a></p>

<p>Trevigi, <a href="#page327">327</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_U" id="arch_U" href="#index_arch">Upjohn, Richard</a>
<a href="#page392">392</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_V" id="arch_V" href="#index_arch">Val Del Vira</a>,
<a href="#page348">348</a></p>

<p>Valentino di Lira, <a href="#page343">343</a></p>

<p>Van Aken, <a href="#page343">343</a></p>

<p>Van Brugh, Sir John <a href="#page332">332</a></p>

<p>Van Noort, William <a href="#page336">336</a></p>

<p>Van Noye, Sebastian <a href="#page336">336</a></p>

<p>Van Vitelli, <a href="#page304">304</a></p>

<p>Vasari, Giorgio <a href="#page162">162</a></p>

<p>Viart, Charles <a href="#page311">311</a></p>

<p>Viel, <a href="#page372">372</a></p>

<p>Vignola, Giacomo Barozzi da <a href="#page289">289</a>,
<a href="#page292">292</a>,
<a href="#page296">296</a>,
<a href="#page299">299</a>,
<a href="#page300">300</a>,
<a href="#page301">301</a></p>

<p>Vignon, Pierre <a href="#page362">362</a></p>

<p>Viollet-le-Duc, Eugene Emmanuel <a href="#page370">370</a>,
<a href="#page371">371</a></p>

<p>Vischer, Kaspar <a href="#page343">343</a></p>

<p>Vischer, Peter <a href="#page347">347</a></p>

<p>Visconti, Louis T. J. <a href="#page371">371</a>,
<a href="#page372">372</a></p>

<p>Vitoni, Ventura <a href="#page293">293</a></p>

<p>Vitruvius, <a href="#page56">56</a>,
<a href="#page71">71</a>,
<a href="#page77">77</a></p>

<p>Von der Null, <a href="#page376">376</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_W" id="arch_W" href="#index_arch">Wallot, Paul</a>
<a href="#page377">377</a></p>

<p>Wallot, Jean <a href="#page333">333</a></p>

<p>Walter, Thomas Ustick <a href="#page391">391</a></p>

<p>Waterhouse, Alfred <a href="#page381">381</a></p>

<p>Webb, Aston <a href="#page382">382</a></p>

<p>Wilkins, <a href="#page357">357</a></p>

<p>William of Sens, <a href="#page219">219</a></p>

<p>William of Wykeham, <a href="#page222">222</a>,
<a href="#page226">226</a></p>

<p>Wood, <a href="#page333">333</a></p>

<p>Wren, Sir Christopher <a href="#page329">329</a>,
<a href="#page331">331</a>,
<a href="#page332">332</a>,
<a href="#page356">356</a>,
<a href="#page385">385</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="arch_Z" id="arch_Z" href="#index_arch">Ziebland</a>,
<a href="#page375">375</a></p>

</div> <!-- end div index -->

<div class="index">

<span class="pagenum">435</span>
<a name="page435" id="page435"> </a>

<h3><a name="index" id="index">
INDEX.</a></h3>

<p class="mynote note center">
<a href="#index_A">&nbsp;A&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_B">&nbsp;B&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_C">&nbsp;C&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_D">&nbsp;D&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_E">&nbsp;E&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_F">&nbsp;F&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_G">&nbsp;G&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_H">&nbsp;H&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_I">&nbsp;I&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_J">&nbsp;J&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_K">&nbsp;K&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_L">&nbsp;L&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_M">&nbsp;M&nbsp;</a><br>
<a href="#index_N">&nbsp;N&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_O">&nbsp;O&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_P">&nbsp;P&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_R">&nbsp;R&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_S">&nbsp;S&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_T">&nbsp;T&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_U">&nbsp;U&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_V">&nbsp;V&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_W">&nbsp;W&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_X">&nbsp;X&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_Y">&nbsp;Y&nbsp;</a>
<a href="#index_Z">&nbsp;Z&nbsp;</a><br>
&nbsp;<br>
Highlighted names link back to the beginning of this Index. Page and
figure numbers link to the referenced page or figure.</p>

<p class="note">
The buildings are arranged according to location. Those which appear
only in the lists of monuments at the ends of chapters are omitted.
<i>Numerals in parentheses refer to illustrations.</i></p>


<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_A" id="index_A" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Abayagiri.</span></a></p>
<p class="inset1">
Tope, <a href="#page403">403</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Abbeville.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Wulfrand, <a href="#page209">209</a>,
<a href="#page213">213</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Abu-Seir.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Stepped pyramid, <a href="#page9">9</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Abydos.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Columns, <a href="#page12">12</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, <a href="#page19">19</a>,
<a href="#page21">21</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tombs, <a href="#page11">11</a>
(<a href="#fig5"><b>5</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Addeh.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Grotto-temple, <a href="#page22">22</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Æmilia.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches in, <a href="#page157">157</a>,
<a href="#page262">262</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Agra</span>,
<a href="#page149">149</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pearl Mosque, <a href="#page148">148</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Taj Mahal, <a href="#page148">148</a>
(<a href="#fig86"><b>86</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Agrigentum.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Zeus, <a href="#page56">56</a>,
<a href="#page61">61</a>
(<a href="#fig33"><b>33</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Ahmedabad</span>,
<a href="#page148">148</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Aix-la-Chapelle.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Minster (palatine Chapel),
<a href="#page172">172</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace of Charlemagne,
<a href="#page176">176</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Aizanoi.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Zeus, <a href="#page67">67</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatre, <a href="#page70">70</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Ajmir</span>,
<a href="#page148">148</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Ajunta.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Brahman Chaityas, <a href="#page404">404</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
viharas, <a href="#page405">405</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Albano.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Tomb, <a href="#page89">89</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Albany.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
All Saints’ Cathedral,
<a href="#page394">394</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Capitol, <a href="#page391">391</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Alby</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page185">185</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page206">206</a>,
<a href="#page212">212</a>,
<a href="#page249">249</a>
(<a href="#fig123"><b>123</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Alcala de Heñares</span>,
<a href="#page352">352</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Archepiscopal Palace, <a href="#page350">350</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
College, <a href="#page349">349</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Alcantara.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Bridge, <a href="#page108">108</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Alençon</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page209">209</a>,
<a href="#page213">213</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Alexandria Troas.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Palæstra, <a href="#page71">71</a>.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Allahabad.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Akbar’s Palace, <a href="#page148">148</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Altenburg</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page242">242</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page344">344</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Amada.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Columns, <a href="#page12">12</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Amboise</span> Castle,
<a href="#page310">310</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Amiens</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page189">189</a>,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page201">201</a>,
<a href="#page203">203</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page206">206</a>,
<a href="#page219">219</a>,
<a href="#page232">232</a>
(<a href="#fig122"><b>122</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset1">
west front of, <a href="#page207">207</a>,
<a href="#page208">208</a>,
<a href="#page212">212</a>,
<a href="#page227">227</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Amravati.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Topes, <a href="#page403">403</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Amsterdam.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Bourse (Exchange) Hanse House, Town hall, <a href="#page336">336</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Ancy le Franc.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page317">317</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Anet.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page317">317</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Angers.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral S. Maurice, <a href="#page200">200</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hospital, <a href="#page214">214</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Angora</span> (Ancyra),
<a href="#page118">118</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Angoulême</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page164">164</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Ani</span>,
<a href="#page134">134</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Annapolis.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Harwood and Hammond Houses, <a href="#page386">386</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Antioch</span>,
<a href="#page115">115</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Antiphellus.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatre, <a href="#page70">70</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tombs, <a href="#page72">72</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Antwerp</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral,
<a href="#page190">190</a>,
<a href="#page246">246</a>,
<a href="#page247">247</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town Hall, <a href="#page334">334</a>,
<a href="#page336">336</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Aquitania.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches of, <a href="#page164">164</a>,
<a href="#page167">167</a>,
<a href="#page168">168</a>,
<a href="#page179">179</a>,
<a href="#page373">373</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Aranjuez.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace, <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Arezzo</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page257">257</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sta. Maria della Pieve,
<a href="#page159">159</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">436</span>
<a name="page436" id="page436"> </a>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Argos.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Gates, <a href="#page45">45</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Arizona.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Spanish churches in, <a href="#page388">388</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Arles.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Trophime, <a href="#page165">165</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Aschaffenburg.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Asheville.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Biltmore House, <a href="#page399">399</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Asia Minor</span>,
<a href="#page53">53</a>,
<a href="#page55">55</a>,
<a href="#page58">58</a>,
<a href="#page62">62</a>,
<a href="#page66">66</a>,
<a href="#page122">122</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Aspendus.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatre, <a href="#page70">70</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Assisi.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Francis (S.&nbsp;Francesco), <a href="#page255">255</a>,
<a href="#page256">256</a>,
<a href="#page258">258</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Assos</span>,
<a href="#page55">55</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Public cquare, <a href="#page69">69</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, <a href="#page61">61</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Asti.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page256">256</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Astorga.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Rood-screen, <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Athens.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Academy, <a href="#page365">365</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Acropolis, <a href="#page65">65</a>,
<a href="#page69">69</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Agora Gate, <a href="#page68">68</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page134">134</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Choragic Monument of Lysicrates,
<a href="#page66">66</a>
(<a href="#fig30"><b>30</b></a>,
<a href="#fig38"><b>38</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Erechtheum, <a href="#page64">64</a>
(<a href="#fig35"><b>35</b></a>,
<a href="#fig36"><b>36</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Museum, <a href="#page365">365</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Odeion of Regilla (of Herodes Atticus),
<a href="#page68">68</a>,
<a href="#page69">69</a>,
<a href="#page70">70</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Parthenon, <a href="#page56">56</a>,
<a href="#page58">58</a>,
<a href="#page63">63</a>,
<a href="#page64">64</a>,
<a href="#page131">131</a>,
<a href="#page359">359</a>
(<a href="#frontis">Frontispiece</a>,
<a href="#fig31"><b>31</b> <i>d</i></a>,
<a href="#fig34"><b>34</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Propylæa, <a href="#page58">58</a>,
<a href="#page65">65</a>,
<a href="#page69">69</a>,
<a href="#page358">358</a>
(<a href="#fig37"><b>37</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Stoa of Attalus, <a href="#page67">67</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Nike Apteros,
<a href="#page64">64</a>,
<a href="#page65">65</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Olympian Zeus,
<a href="#page68">68</a>
(<a href="#fig39"><b>39</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatre of Dionysus, <a href="#page69">69</a>,
<a href="#page70">70</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Theseum (Temple of Theseus or Heracles),
<a href="#page62">62</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tower of Winds (Clepsydra of Cyrrhestes),
<a href="#page53">53</a>,
<a href="#page67">67</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
University, <a href="#page365">365</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Attica</span>,
<a href="#page50">50</a>,
<a href="#page55">55</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Augsburg.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page344">344</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Austria</span>,
<a href="#page330">330</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Autun</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page166">166</a>,
<a href="#page167">167</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Auvergne.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches, <a href="#page204">204</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Auxerre</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page201">201</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Avignon.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Notre Dame Des Doms, <a href="#page165">165</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Avila.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Vincente, <a href="#page180">180</a>,
<a href="#page247">247</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tombs in, <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Azay-le-rideau.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page316">316</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_B" id="index_B" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Baalbec</span></a>
(Heliopolis), <a href="#page83">83</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Circular Temple, <a href="#page94">94</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Sun, <a href="#page92">92</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bab-el-Molouk</span>,
<a href="#page14">14</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bagdad.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Tombs, etc., <a href="#page145">145</a>,
<a href="#page146">146</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bagh.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Viharas, Great Vihara, <a href="#page405">405</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Baillur.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Temples, <a href="#page409">409</a>,
<a href="#page410">410</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bamberg.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Barcelona.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page189">189</a>,
<a href="#page249">249</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sta. Maria del Pi, <a href="#page249">249</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Barolli.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Hindu Temple, <a href="#page409">409</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Basle.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Spahlenthor, <a href="#page246">246</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bassæ</span> (Phigalæa).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Apollo Epicurius,
<a href="#page65">65</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Batalha.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, mausoleum, <a href="#page251">251</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bavaria</span>,
<a href="#page342">342</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bayeux</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bayonne</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Beaugency.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page316">316</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Beaumesnil.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page319">319</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Beaune.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Hospital, <a href="#page214">214</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Beauvais</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page189">189</a>,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page211">211</a>,
<a href="#page219">219</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
chapels, <a href="#page205">205</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
size, <a href="#page206">206</a>,
<a href="#page211">211</a>,
<a href="#page212">212</a>,
<a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Beit-el-wali.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Rock-cut Temple, <a href="#page22">22</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Belem.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page251">251</a>,
<a href="#page352">352</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cloister, tower, <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Belgium</span>,
<a href="#page334">334</a>.</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Benares.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Hindu Temples, <a href="#page408">408</a>,
<a href="#page409">409</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Beni Hassan.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Columns, <a href="#page11">11</a>,
<a href="#page24">24</a>,
<a href="#page50">50</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Speos Artemidos, <a href="#page22">22</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tombs, <a href="#page11">11</a>
(<a href="#fig6"><b>6</b></a>,
<a href="#fig7"><b>7</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bergamo.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Town Hall, <a href="#page266">266</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Berlin.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
<ins class="correction" title="text has ‘Bauschüle’ with umlaut">Bauschule</ins>,
<a href="#page376">376</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Brandenburg Gate, <a href="#page358">358</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Old Museum, <a href="#page359">359</a>
(<a href="#fig200"><b>200</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
New Museum, <a href="#page359">359</a>.</p>
<p class="inset2">
<span class="mynote">
Alphabetized as shown; body text has “Museum” and “New
Museum”.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Parliament House, <a href="#page377">377</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatres, <a href="#page360">360</a>,
<a href="#page376">376</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bethlehem.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of the Nativity, <a href="#page115">115</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bhaja.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Chaityas, <a href="#page404">404</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">437</span>
<a name="page437" id="page437"> </a>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Bhilsa.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Topes, <a href="#page403">403</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bhuwaneswar.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Hindu temples, <a href="#page408">408</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bidar</span>,
<a href="#page146">146</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bijapur.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Tomb of Mahmud, <a href="#page148">148</a>,
<a href="#page153">153</a>
(<a href="#fig85"><b>85</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Jumma Musjid, <a href="#page148">148</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Mogul architecture, <a href="#page149">149</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Biltmore</span> House,
<a href="#page399">399</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bindrabun.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Ruined temple, <a href="#page408">408</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Birs Nimroud.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Stepped pyramid, <a href="#page31">31</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Blenheim</span> House,
<a href="#page332">332</a>
(<a href="#fig188"><b>188</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Blois.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Château of, <a href="#page216">216</a>,
<a href="#page310">310</a>,
<a href="#page313">313</a>
(<a href="#fig175"><b>175</b></a>,
<a href="#fig176"><b>176</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bohemia</span>,
<a href="#page338">338</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bologna</span>,
<a href="#page157">157</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Brick houses, <a href="#page266">266</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Campo Santo, <a href="#page382">382</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Frati di S. Spirito, <a href="#page279">279</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Local style, <a href="#page283">283</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pal. Bevilacqua, Pal. Fava,
<a href="#page283">283</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palazzo Communale (town Hall),
<a href="#page266">266</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Renaissance churches in,
<a href="#page277">277</a>,
<a href="#page293">293</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Francesco, <a href="#page256">256</a>,
<a href="#page263">263</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Petronio, <a href="#page257">257</a>,
<a href="#page258">258</a>,
<a href="#page259">259</a>,
<a href="#page263">263</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sta. Maria dei Servi, <a href="#page263">263</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bonn.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Minster, <a href="#page174">174</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Baptistery, <a href="#page175">175</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bordeaux.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, spires, <a href="#page209">209</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Grand Théatre, <a href="#page362">362</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Boston.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Ames Building, <a href="#page397">397</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Custom House, <a href="#page390">390</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Faneuil Hall, <a href="#page388">388</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Fine Arts Museum, <a href="#page394">394</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hancock House, <a href="#page387">387</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Old State House, <a href="#page388">388</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Old South Church, <a href="#page386">386</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Public Library, <a href="#page399">399</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
State House, <a href="#page390">390</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Trinity Church, <a href="#page394">394</a>
(<a href="#fig222"><b>222</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bourges</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page189">189</a>,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page199">199</a>,
<a href="#page202">202</a>,
<a href="#page249">249</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
chapels, <a href="#page205">205</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
size, <a href="#page206">206</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
portals, <a href="#page208">208</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
House of Jacques Cœur,
<a href="#page215">215</a>
(<a href="#fig127"><b>127</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bournazel.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page315">315</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bowden Park</span>,
<a href="#page357">357</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bozrah</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page117">117</a>
(<a href="#fig70"><b>70</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Brandenburg.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Catherine, St. Godehard, <a href="#page244">244</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bremen.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page246">246</a>,
<a href="#page344">344</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Brescia.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Sta. Maria dei Miracoli, <a href="#page287">287</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Brieg.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Piastenschloss, <a href="#page343">343</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bristol</span> Cathedral, piers,
<a href="#page178">178</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bruges.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Ancien Greffe, <a href="#page334">334</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cloth hall, <a href="#page247">247</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ste. Anne, <a href="#page334">334</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page247">247</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Brunswick.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Burg Dankwargerode, <a href="#page176">176</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page246">246</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Brusa</span>,
<a href="#page150">150</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Brussels.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Bourse, <a href="#page382">382</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral (ste. Gudule),
<a href="#page246">246</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pal. de Justice, <a href="#page382">382</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Renaissance Houses, <a href="#page335">335</a>
(<a href="#fig190"><b>190</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town Hall, <a href="#page247">247</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bubastis.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, <a href="#page13">13</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Buda-Pesth.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Synagogue, <a href="#page378">378</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Buddh Gaya.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Tope or stupa, <a href="#page404">404</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Buffalo.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Guaranty Building, <a href="#page397">397</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bulach.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Basilica, <a href="#page375">375</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Burgundy.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedrals in, <a href="#page197">197</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Burghley</span> House,
<a href="#page328">328</a>
(<a href="#fig184"><b>184</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Bury.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page315">315</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Burgos</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page248">248</a>,
<a href="#page249">249</a>,
<a href="#page251">251</a>
(<a href="#fig145"><b>145</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Byzantium</span>,
<a href="#page92">92</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
See Constantinople</p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_C" id="index_C" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Caen.</span></a></p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches, <a href="#page167">167</a>,
<a href="#page178">178</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Étienne (Abbaye aux Hommes) and Ste. Trinité (Abbaye aux Dames),
<a href="#page168">168</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Pierre, <a href="#page312">312</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hôtel D’Écoville, <a href="#page316">316</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cahors</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page164">164</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cairo.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Karafah (Tombs of Khalîfs),
<a href="#page137">137</a>,
<a href="#page138">138</a>,
<a href="#page139">139</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Mohammedan monuments (list),
<a href="#page136">136</a>,
<a href="#page153">153</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Mosque of Amrou, <a href="#page136">136</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Ibn Touloun, <a href="#page136">136</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Barkouk, <a href="#page137">137</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Kalaoun, <a href="#page137">137</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Sultan Hassan, <a href="#page137">137</a>,
<a href="#page138">138</a>
(<a href="#fig80"><b>80</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
of El Muayyad, <a href="#page137">137</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Kaîd Bey, <a href="#page137">137</a>
(<a href="#fig81"><b>81</b></a>)</p>

<span class="pagenum">438</span>
<a name="page438" id="page438"> </a>
<p><span class="smallcaps">California.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Spanish missions and churches, <a href="#page388">388</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cambodia.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Nakhon Wat, <a href="#page413">413</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cambray</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cambridge.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Caius College, Gate of Honor,
<a href="#page328">328</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Fitzwilliam Museum, <a href="#page356">356</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
King’s College Chapel,
<a href="#page223">223</a>,
<a href="#page227">227</a>,
<a href="#page234">234</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Trinity College Library,
<a href="#page332">332</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cambridge</span> (Mass.).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Craigie (Longfellow) House,
<a href="#page387">387</a>
(<a href="#fig219"><b>219</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Canterbury</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page219">219</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
central tower of, <a href="#page228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
chapels, <a href="#page231">231</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
transepts, <a href="#page232">232</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
minor works in, <a href="#page234">234</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Caprarola.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace of, <a href="#page300">300</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Capua.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Amphitheatre, <a href="#page103">103</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Caria</span>,
<a href="#page71">71</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
see Halicamassus</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Carinthia</span>,
<a href="#page338">338</a>,
<a href="#page339">339</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Carlton</span> House,
<a href="#page357">357</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Carter’s Grove</span>,
<a href="#page386">386</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Caserta.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Royal Palace, <a href="#page304">304</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Castle Howard</span>,
<a href="#page332">332</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cérisy-la-Forêt.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page178">178</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Ceylon.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Topes, <a href="#page403">403</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chaise-Dieu.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Cloister, <a href="#page213">213</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Châlons</span> (Châlons-sur-Marne)
Cathedral,
<a href="#page205">205</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chalvau.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page314">314</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chambord.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page314">314</a>
(<a href="#fig177"><b>177</b></a>,
<a href="#fig178"><b>178</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chantilly.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
“Petit Château,” <a href="#page317">317</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Charleston.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Michael’s, <a href="#page385">385</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Charlotteville.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
University of Virginia, <a href="#page390">390</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Charlton</span> Hall,
<a href="#page328">328</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Charlton-on-Oxmore.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Plate tracery (<a href="#fig110"><b>110</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chartres</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page201">201</a>,
<a href="#page203">203</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
chapels of, <a href="#page205">205</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
size of, <a href="#page206">206</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
W. front, <a href="#page207">207</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
transept porches, <a href="#page208">208</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
spires, <a href="#page209">209</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
capital from (<a href="#fig126"><b>126</b></a> C).</p>
<p class="inset1">
hospital, <a href="#page214">214</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chemnitz</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page245">245</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chenonceaux.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page316">316</a>,
<a href="#page317">317</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chiaravalle.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Certosa, <a href="#page255">255</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chicago.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Auditorium Theatre, <a href="#page399">399</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Columbian Exposition, <a href="#page393">393</a>,
<a href="#page399">399</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Masonic Building, <a href="#page396">396</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Fisher Building, Schiller Building,
<a href="#page397">397</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chichester</span> Cathedral, spire,
<a href="#page229">229</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chihuahua.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chillambaram.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Dravidian Temple, Mantapa of Parvati, <a href="#page411">411</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chiswick.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Villa, <a href="#page328">328</a>,
<a href="#page329">329</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Chittore.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Hindu temples, <a href="#page409">409</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace, <a href="#page409">409</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Towers, <a href="#page407">407</a>,
<a href="#page408">408</a>
(<a href="#fig227"><b>227</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Clermont</span> (Clermont-Ferrand)</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page197">197</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
chapels of, <a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page212">212</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Notre-Dame-du-Port, <a href="#page165">165</a>,
<a href="#page204">204</a>
(<a href="#fig96"><b>96</b></a>,
<a href="#fig97"><b>97</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cluny.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Abbey Church, <a href="#page166">166</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Houses at, <a href="#page214">214</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hôtel de (at Paris), <a href="#page216">216</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Coblentz.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Castor, <a href="#page237">237</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Coimbra.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Sta. Cruz, <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Coleshill.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
House, <a href="#page329">329</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cologne.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Apostles’ Church, <a href="#page174">174</a>,
<a href="#page243">243</a>
(<a href="#fig101"><b>101</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page189">189</a>,
<a href="#page192">192</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page243">243</a>,
<a href="#page249">249</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
vaulting of, <a href="#page239">239</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
spires, <a href="#page240">240</a>,
<a href="#page241">241</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
plan, <a href="#page189">189</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page242">242</a>
(<a href="#fig141"><b>141</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Mary-in-the-Capitol,
<a href="#page174">174</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Great St. Martin’s, <a href="#page174">174</a>,
<a href="#page243">243</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Romanesque Houses, Etc.,
<a href="#page176">176</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Como.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall (broletto), <a href="#page266">266</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Compostella.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Iago, <a href="#page180">180</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Conjeveram.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Dravidian temple, <a href="#page411">411</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">439</span>
<a name="page439" id="page439"> </a>
<p class="smallcaps">Constantine.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Amphitheatre, <a href="#page92">92</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Constantinople</span>,
<a href="#page120">120</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Byzantine monuments (list),
<a href="#page134">134</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of Hagia Sophia (Santa Sophia, Divine Wisdom),
<a href="#page111">111</a>,
<a href="#page123">123</a>,
<a href="#page124">124</a>,
<a href="#page127">127&ndash;131</a>,
<a href="#page132">132</a>,
<a href="#page133">133</a>,
<a href="#page150">150</a>,
<a href="#page151">151</a>
(<a href="#fig72"><b>72</b></a>,
<a href="#fig75"><b>75</b></a>,
<a href="#fig76"><b>76</b></a>,
<a href="#fig77"><b>77</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of the Apostles,
<a href="#page132">132</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Early Christian monuments (list),
<a href="#page119">119</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Fountains, Fountain of Ahmet III.,
<a href="#page152">152</a>,
<a href="#page153">153</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Mosque of Ahmet II. (Ahmediyeh),
<a href="#page151">151</a>
(<a href="#fig88"><b>88</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Mehmet II., <a href="#page150">150</a>,
<a href="#page151">151</a>
(<a href="#fig87"><b>87</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Osman III. (Nouri Osman),
<a href="#page151">151</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Soliman (Suleimaniyeh),
<a href="#page151">151</a>
(<a href="#fig89"><b>89</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Yeni Djami, <a href="#page151">151</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palaces, <a href="#page153">153</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Bacchus, <a href="#page127">127</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. John Studius (Emir Akhor mosque),
<a href="#page118">118</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Sergius, <a href="#page117">117</a>,
<a href="#page127">127</a>
(<a href="#fig74"><b>74</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tchinli Kiosque (Imperial Museum),
<a href="#page153">153</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
sarcophagi in, <a href="#page66">66</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tombs, <a href="#page152">152</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Turkish mosques, <a href="#page150">150</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Copenhagen.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Exchange, Fredericksborg,
<a href="#page336">336</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cordova</span>,
<a href="#page141">141</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Great Mosque, <a href="#page142">142</a>,
<a href="#page143">143</a>
(<a href="#fig83"><b>83</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Corinth.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Zeus, <a href="#page60">60</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Coutances</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
chapels of, <a href="#page205">205</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
spires, <a href="#page209">209</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Cracow</span> Castle,
<a href="#page338">338</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Chapel of Jagellons, <a href="#page338">338</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Cremona.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page266">266</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Ctesiphon.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tâk-kesra, <a href="#page145">145</a></p>
<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_D" id="index_D" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Damascus</span></a>,
Mosque of El-walîd, <a href="#page136">136</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Dantzic.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page344">344</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Dashour.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pyramid, <a href="#page9">9</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Deir-el-bahari.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tomb-temple of Hatasu,
<a href="#page15">15</a>,
<a href="#page21">21</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Deir-el-medineh.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Hathor, <a href="#page19">19</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Delhi.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Jaina Temples, <a href="#page407">407</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Jumma Musjid, <a href="#page148">148</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Mogul Architecture of,
<a href="#page149">149</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace of Shah Jehan, <a href="#page148">148</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pathan arches, Etc., <a href="#page148">148</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Delos.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gates, <a href="#page45">45</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Portico of Philip, <a href="#page67">67</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Denderah.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Hathor, <a href="#page17">17</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Group of Temples, <a href="#page22">22</a>,
<a href="#page24">24</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hathoric columns, <a href="#page24">24</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Detroit.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Majestic Building, <a href="#page397">397</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Dieppe.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Jacques,
<a href="#page213">213</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Dijon.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Michel, <a href="#page312">312</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Dol</span> Cathedral, east end,
<a href="#page205">205</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Dresden.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Castle, Georgenflügel,
<a href="#page342">342</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Mary (Marienkirche) <a href="#page346">346</a>
(<a href="#fig194"><b>194</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatre, <a href="#page376">376</a>
(<a href="#fig213"><b>213</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Zwinger Palace, <a href="#page346">346</a>
(<a href="#fig193"><b>193</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Drügelte.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Circular church, <a href="#page175">175</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Durham</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page177">177</a>,
<a href="#page178">178</a>,
<a href="#page220">220</a>,
<a href="#page221">221</a>
(<a href="#fig116"><ins class="correction" title="text has ‘116’"><b>102</b></ins></a>);</p>
<p class="inset1">
central tower of, <a href="#page228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Chapel of Nine Altars,
<a href="#page232">232</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_E" id="index_E" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Earl’s Barton</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tower, <a href="#page176">176</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Ecouen.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page316">316</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Edfou.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Great Temple, <a href="#page16">16</a>,
<a href="#page17">17</a>,
<a href="#page22">22</a>
(<a href="#fig9"><b>9</b></a>,
<a href="#fig10"><b>10</b></a>,
<a href="#fig14"><b>14</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Peripteral Temple, <a href="#page22">22</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Edinburgh.</p>
<p class="inset1">
High School, Royal Institution,
<a href="#page357">357</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Egypt.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Early Christian buildings in,
<a href="#page118">118</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Elephantine.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Amenophis III.,
<a href="#page22">22</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">El Kab.</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Amenophis III.; <a href="#page18">18</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Eleusis.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Propylæa, <a href="#page69">69</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Ellora.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Chaityas, <a href="#page404">404</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Dravidian Kylas, <a href="#page413">413</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Elne.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cloister, <a href="#page170">170</a>,
<a href="#page213">213</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Ely</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page220">220</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
choir vault, <a href="#page222">222</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
octagon, <a href="#page224">224</a>,
<a href="#page330">330</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
clearstory, <a href="#page225">225</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
towers, <a href="#page228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
interior, <a href="#page229">229</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
size, <a href="#page232">232</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Lady Chapel, <a href="#page234">234</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">440</span>
<a name="page440" id="page440"> </a>
<p class="smallcaps">Ephesus.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Artemis (Artemisium),
<a href="#page66">66</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ionic Order, <a href="#page53">53</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palæstra, <a href="#page71">71</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Erech</span>,
<a href="#page31">31</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Escurial.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Monastery, <a href="#page351">351</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Esneh.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hathoric columns, <a href="#page25">25</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, <a href="#page23">23</a>.</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Essen.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Nun’s choir, <a href="#page172">172</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Esslingen.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church spire, <a href="#page240">240</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Etchmiadzin.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Byzantine monuments, <a href="#page134">134</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Evreux</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Exeter</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page221">221</a>
(<a href="#fig129"><b>129</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Ezra.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. George, <a href="#page117">117</a></p>
<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_F" id="index_F" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Feraig</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Rock-cut Temple, <a href="#page22">22</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Ferrara</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page261">261</a>,
<a href="#page304">304</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches, <a href="#page277">277</a>,
<a href="#page293">293</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palaces Scrofa, Roverella,
<a href="#page283">283</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Firouzabad.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sassanian Buildings, <a href="#page144">144</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Florence.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Baptistery, <a href="#page162">162</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Bartolini, Guadagni, Larderel, Pandolfini, Serristori palaces,
<a href="#page291">291</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Campanile, <a href="#page263">263</a>,
<a href="#page264">264</a>
(<a href="#fig147"><b>147</b> <i>a</i></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral (Duomo, Santa Maria del Fiore),
<a href="#page257">257</a>,
<a href="#page258">258</a>,
<a href="#page263">263</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
façade, <a href="#page261">261</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
marble incrustation, <a href="#page263">263</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
dome,
<a href="#page273">273&ndash;275</a>
(<a href="#fig147"><b>147</b></a>,
<a href="#fig148"><b>148</b></a>,
<a href="#fig159"><b>159</b></a>,
<a href="#fig160"><b>160</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church</p>
<p class="inset2">
of San Miniato, <a href="#page115">115</a>,
<a href="#page161">161</a>,
<a href="#page162">162</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Or San Michele, <a href="#page264">264</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gondi Palace, <a href="#page291">291</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Loggia dei Lanzi, <a href="#page266">266</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Loggia di San Paolo, <a href="#page281">281</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Minor works, <a href="#page287">287</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ospedale degli Innocenti,
<a href="#page281">281</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palazzo Vecchio, <a href="#page265">265</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pitti Palace, <a href="#page280">280</a>,
<a href="#page300">300</a>,
<a href="#page319">319</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Riccardi Palace, <a href="#page279">279</a>,
<a href="#page280">280</a>,
<a href="#page281">281</a>,
<a href="#page290">290</a>
(<a href="#fig162"><b>162</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Rucellai Palace, <a href="#page280">280</a>,
<a href="#page282">282</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Santa Croce, <a href="#page258">258</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pazzi Chapel of, <a href="#page276">276</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
pulpit in, <a href="#page281">281</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Marsupini tomb, <a href="#page281">281</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
San Lorenzo, <a href="#page276">276</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
San Spirito, <a href="#page276">276</a>
(<a href="#fig161"><b>161</b></a>),</p>
<p class="inset1">
Santa Maria Novella, <a href="#page256">256</a>,
<a href="#page258">258</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
façade, <a href="#page277">277</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
fountain in sacristy of,
<a href="#page281">281</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Strozzi Palace, <a href="#page280">280</a>,
<a href="#page290">290</a>
(<a href="#fig163"><b>163</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Flushing.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall (Hôtel de Ville),
<a href="#page335">335</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Fontainebleau.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace, <a href="#page313">313</a>,
<a href="#page318">318</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Fontevrault.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Abbey, <a href="#page164">164</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Fontfroide.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cloister, <a href="#page213">213</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">France.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Romanesque monuments (list),
<a href="#page170">170</a>,
<a href="#page171">171</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gothic monuments (list),
<a href="#page216">216</a>,
<a href="#page217">217</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Renaissance monuments (list),
<a href="#page324">324</a>,
<a href="#page325">325</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Frankfort.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Salt House, <a href="#page346">346</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Freiburg</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page239">239</a>,
<a href="#page242">242</a>,
<a href="#page243">243</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Spire, <a href="#page240">240</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Freiberg im Erzgebirge.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Golden portal, <a href="#page242">242</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Fritzlar.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Fulda.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Monastery, <a href="#page172">172</a>,
<a href="#page173">173</a>,
<a href="#page175">175</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Furness.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Abbey, pointed arches,
<a href="#page219">219</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Futtehpore Sikhri.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Mosque of Akbar, <a href="#page148">148</a></p>
<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_G" id="index_G" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Gandhara</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Monasteries, <a href="#page404">404</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Gaillon.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page310">310</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Gelnhausen.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Abbey Church,
<a href="#page243">243</a>. Castle ruins,
<a href="#page176">176</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Genoa.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Campo Santo, <a href="#page382">382</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, west front,
<a href="#page261">261</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Palaces</span>:&mdash;
Balbi, Brignole, Cambiasi, Doria-tursi (municipio), Durazzo (reale),
Pallavicini, University,
<a href="#page302">302</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sta. Maria Di Carignano,
<a href="#page299">299</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Germany.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Mediæval, <a href="#page172">172</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Romanesque monuments (list),
<a href="#page180">180</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gothic monuments (list),
<a href="#page252">252</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Renaissance monuments (list),
<a href="#page353">353</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">441</span>
<a name="page441" id="page441"> </a>
<p class="smallcaps">Gernrode.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Romanesque church, <a href="#page173">173</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Gerona</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page185">185</a>,
<a href="#page249">249</a>,
<a href="#page250">250</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Ghent</span> (Gand).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cloth hall, <a href="#page247">247</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Gherf Hossein.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Rock-cut temple, <a href="#page22">22</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Ghertashi</span> (Kardassy).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, <a href="#page23">23</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Ghizeh.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pyramids, <a href="#page4">4</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pyramid of Cheops, <a href="#page7">7</a>
(<a href="#fig1"><b>1</b></a>,
<a href="#fig2"><b>2</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset1">
of Chephren, <a href="#page8">8</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
of Mycerinus, <a href="#page8">8</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sphinx, Sphinx temple,
<a href="#page10">10</a>
(<a href="#fig3"><b>3</b></a>,
<a href="#fig4"><b>4</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Girnar.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Jaina temples, <a href="#page407">407</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Neminatha, <a href="#page407">407</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Glasgow.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches in Greek style,
<a href="#page357">357</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Gloucester</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page178">178</a>,
<a href="#page220">220</a>,
<a href="#page222">222</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
cloisters, <a href="#page222">222</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
east window, <a href="#page227">227</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
central tower, <a href="#page228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Lady Chapel, <a href="#page234">234</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Goslar.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace of Henry III., <a href="#page176">176</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Gournah.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Columns, <a href="#page24">24</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, <a href="#page21">21</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Gran.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cruciform Chapel, <a href="#page338">338</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Granada</span>,
<a href="#page141">141</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Alhambra, <a href="#page142">142</a>,
<a href="#page143">143</a>,
<a href="#page144">144</a>,
<a href="#page351">351</a>
(<a href="#fig84"><b>84</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page348">348</a>,
<a href="#page350">350</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
minor works in, <a href="#page352">352</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace of Charles V., <a href="#page352">352</a>
(<a href="#fig197"><b>197</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Grange</span> House,
<a href="#page357">357</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Great Britain.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gothic monuments (list),
<a href="#page235">235</a>,
<a href="#page236">236</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Norman monuments (list),
<a href="#page181">181</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Renaissance monuments (list),
<a href="#page337">337</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Guadalajara.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Infantado, <a href="#page350">350</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Gujerat</span>,
<a href="#page146">146</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Gwalior.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Jaina Temples, <a href="#page407">407</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace, <a href="#page409">409</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Teli-ka-mandir, <a href="#page409">409</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_H" id="index_H" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Haddon</span></a> Hall,
<a href="#page326">326</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Hague, The.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page336">336</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Hämelschenburg</span> Castle,
<a href="#page343">343</a>
(<a href="#fig191"><b>191</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Halberstadt</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page244">244</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page245">245</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Halicarnassus.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Mausoleum, <a href="#page4">4</a>,
<a href="#page53">53</a>,
<a href="#page71">71</a>,
<a href="#page72">72</a>
(<a href="#fig41"><b>41</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Hamoncondah.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, <a href="#page410">410</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Hampton</span> Court,
<a href="#page326">326</a>,
<a href="#page332">332</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Hartford.</p>
<p class="inset1">
State Capitol, <a href="#page393">393</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Hauran.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Roman works in, <a href="#page92">92</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
domestic buildings, <a href="#page118">118</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Hardwicke</span> Hall,
<a href="#page328">328</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Hatfield</span> House,
<a href="#page328">328</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Hecklingen.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Romanesque church, <a href="#page173">173</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Heidelberg</span> Castle,
<a href="#page343">343</a>
(<a href="#fig192"><b>192</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ritter House, <a href="#page346">346</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Heilsberg</span> Castle,
<a href="#page245">245</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Heldburg</span> Castle,
<a href="#page342">342</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Hengreave</span> Hall,
<a href="#page326">326</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Herculanum</span>,
<a href="#page86">86</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Amphitheatre, <a href="#page92">92</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Houses, <a href="#page107">107</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatre, (<a href="#fig61"><b>61</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Hereford</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page220">220</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Hierapolis.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Early Christian buildings in,
<a href="#page118">118</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Hildesheim.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Kaiserhaus, <a href="#page346">346</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Renaissance houses, <a href="#page345">345</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Godehard, <a href="#page173">173</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page245">245</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Wedekindsches Haus, <a href="#page346">346</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Holland</span> House,
<a href="#page328">328</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Howard</span> Castle,
<a href="#page332">332</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Hullabîd.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temples, <a href="#page409">409</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
double temple, <a href="#page410">410</a>
(<a href="#fig228"><b>228</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset1">
Kaît Iswara, <a href="#page410">410</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_I" id="index_I" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Iffley</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page179">179</a>(<a href="#fig104"><b>104</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">India</span>,
<a href="#page146">146&ndash;149</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Moslem monuments (list),
<a href="#page154">154</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Non-moslem monuments (list),
<a href="#page415">415</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Innsbrück</span>, Schloss Ambras,
<a href="#page339">339</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Ipsamboul.</p>
<p class="inset1">
(Abou Simbel). Grotto temples,
<a href="#page21">21</a>,
<a href="#page22">22</a>
(<a href="#fig13"><b>13</b></a>)</p>

<span class="pagenum">442</span>
<a name="page442" id="page442"> </a>
<p class="smallcaps">Ireland.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Celtic Towers, <a href="#page176">176</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Ispahan.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Meidan (Meidan-Shah), Mesjid-Shah, Bazaar, Medress,
<a href="#page146">146</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Issoire.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Paul, <a href="#page165">165</a>,
<a href="#page204">204</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Italy.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Early Christian monuments (list),
<a href="#page119">119</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Romanesque monuments (list),
<a href="#page170">170</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gothic monuments (list),
<a href="#page268">268&ndash;269</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Renaissance monuments (list),
<a href="#page306">306&ndash;307</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_J" id="index_J" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Jaen</span></a> Cathedral,
<a href="#page348">348</a>,
<a href="#page350">350</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Jamalgiri.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Monastery, <a href="#page405">405</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Jerusalem.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of the Ascension, <a href="#page115">115</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Early Christian churches, <a href="#page111">111</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Herod’s temple, <a href="#page41">41</a>,
<a href="#page83">83</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Mosque of Omar (Dome of the Rock, Kubbet-es-sakhrah),
<a href="#page116">116</a>,
<a href="#page136">136</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Octagonal church on temple site,
<a href="#page115">115</a>,
<a href="#page116">116</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tombs of the Kings, Etc., <a href="#page39">39</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tomb of Absalom, of Hezekiah, Golden Gate, Solomon’s temple,
<a href="#page40">40</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Wall of Lamentations, <a href="#page41">41</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Zerubbabel’s temple, <a href="#page41">41</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Jaunpore</span>,
<a href="#page146">146</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_K" id="index_K" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Kalabshé</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Columns, <a href="#page12">12</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, <a href="#page23">23</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Kalb Louzeh.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page117">117</a>(<a href="#fig69"><b>69</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Kalburgah</span>,
<a href="#page146">146</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Kanaruk.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hindu temples, <a href="#page408">408</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Kantonnuggur.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hindu temple, <a href="#page408">408</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Kardassy</span> (Ghertashi).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, <a href="#page23">23</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Karli.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Chaityas, <a href="#page404">404</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Karlstein</span> Castle,
<a href="#page245">245</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Karnak</span>,
<a href="#page50">50</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Great Temple (of Amen Ra) and Hypostyle Hall,
<a href="#pagexxiii">xxiii.</a>,
<a href="#page17">17</a>,
<a href="#page18">18</a>,
<a href="#page19">19</a>,
<a href="#page24">24</a>,
<a href="#page36">36</a>
(<a href="#fig11"><b>11</b></a>,
<a href="#fig12"><b>12</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ancient temple, <a href="#page13">13</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Khonsu, <a href="#page16">16</a>,
<a href="#page20">20</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Kaschau</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page245">245</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Kasr.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Mound, <a href="#page31">31</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Keddlestone</span> Hall,
<a href="#page334">334</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Kelat Seman.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Simeon <!-- invisible hyphen --></p>
<p class="inset1">
Stylites, <a href="#page117">117</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Khajuraho.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Jaina temples, <a href="#page407">407</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Kandarya Mahadeo, <a href="#page408">408</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Khorsabad.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace of Sargon, <a href="#page31">31</a>,
<a href="#page32">32</a>
(<a href="#fig18"><b>18</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
City Gate, <a href="#page32">32</a>,
<a href="#page33">33</a>,
(<a href="#fig19"><b>19</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Kirkstall</span> Abbey, pointed arches,
<a href="#page219">219</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Königsberg.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church At, <a href="#page244">244</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Koyunjik.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palaces of Sennacherib and Assur-bani-pal,
<a href="#page31">31</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Kuttenberg.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Barbara,
<a href="#page239">239</a>,
<a href="#page240">240</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_L" id="index_L" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Laach</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Abbey of, <a href="#page174">174</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Labyrinth</span> (of Moeris or Fayoum in
Egypt),
<a href="#page26">26</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">La Muette.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page314">314</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Landshut.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Residenz, <a href="#page342">342</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Martin’s, <a href="#page240">240</a>,
<a href="#page244">244</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Langres</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page167">167</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Laon</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page206">206</a>,
<a href="#page210">210</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
porches, <a href="#page208">208</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">La Rochefoucauld.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page315">315</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Laval</span> Cathedral (La Trinité),
<a href="#page201">201</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Le Mans</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page200">200</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page206">206</a>
(<a href="#fig118"><b>118</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset1">
tomb in, <a href="#page310">310</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Leon.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page189">189</a>,
<a href="#page249">249</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Panteon of S. Isidore,
<a href="#page179">179</a>,
<a href="#page180">180</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Le Puy</span> (Puy-en-Vélay).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page204">204</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
cloister of same, <a href="#page213">213</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Leipzig.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Fürstenhaus<!-- invisible umlaut -->,
<a href="#page346">346</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Lemgo.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page344">344</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Leyden.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page336">336</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Lichfield</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page225">225</a>,
<a href="#page229">229</a>
(<a href="#fig135"><b>135</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset1">
west front, <a href="#page228">228</a>
(<a href="#fig134"><b>134</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset1">
spire, <a href="#page229">229</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">443</span>
<a name="page443" id="page443"> </a>
<p class="smallcaps">Liège.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Archbishop’s Palace, <a href="#page334">334</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Jacques,
<a href="#page247">247</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Limburg-on-the-Hardt.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page193">193</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Limburg-on-Lahn.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Abbey Church, <a href="#page174">174</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral of St. George,
<a href="#page239">239</a>
(<a href="#fig139"><b>139</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Limoges</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page212">212</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Lincoln</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page219">219</a>,
<a href="#page225">225</a>,
<a href="#page229">229</a>,
<a href="#page232">232</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
west front, <a href="#page227">227</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
central tower, <a href="#page228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
chapter-house, <a href="#page223">223</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Lisbon</span>,
<a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Lisieux</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Liverpool.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. George’s Hall, <a href="#page358">358</a>(<a href="#fig199"><b>199</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Loire Valley.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches of, <a href="#page165">165</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Lombardy.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Romanesque Monuments In,
<a href="#page157">157</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">London.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Albert Memorial, <a href="#page380">380</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Albert Memorial Hall, <a href="#page382">382</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Bank of England, <a href="#page334">334</a>,
<a href="#page356">356</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
British Museum, <a href="#page356">356</a>
(<a href="#fig198"><b>198</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset1">
Elgin marbles in, <a href="#page57">57</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
mausoleum fragments in,
<a href="#page71">71</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral (St. Paul’s),
<a href="#page329">329&ndash;331</a>
(<a href="#fig186"><b>186</b></a>,
<a href="#fig187"><b>187</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Chapel Royal (Banqueting Hall, Whitehall),
<a href="#page329">329</a>
(<a href="#fig185"><b>185</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Churches</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Bow Church, <a href="#page332">332</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. George’s, Bloomsbury,
<a href="#page333">333</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Martin’s-in-the-Fields,
<a href="#page333">333</a>
(<a href="#fig189"><b>189</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Mary’s, Woolnoth, <a href="#page332">332</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Pancras’s, <a href="#page357">357</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Paul’s Cathedral,
<a href="#page329">329&ndash;331</a>
(<a href="#fig186"><b>186</b></a>,
<a href="#fig187"><b>187</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Paul’s, Covent Garden,
<a href="#page329">329</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Stephen’s, Walbrook,
<a href="#page331">331</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Stephen’s Chapel, Westminster,
<a href="#page234">234</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Temple Church, pointed arches in,
<a href="#page219">219</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Westminster Abbey, <a href="#page220">220</a>
(<a href="#fig137"><b>137</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset3">
Henry VII.’s chapel in same,
<a href="#page192">192</a>,
<a href="#page223">223</a>,
<a href="#page227">227</a>,
<a href="#page229">229</a>,
<a href="#page234">234</a>
(<a href="#fig136"><b>136</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Greenwich Hospital, <a href="#page332">332</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Mansion House, <a href="#page334">334</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Natural History Museum, South Kensington,
<a href="#page381">381</a>
(<a href="#fig216"><b>216</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
New Law Courts, <a href="#page380">380</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Newgate Prison, <a href="#page334">334</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Parliament Houses, <a href="#page234">234</a>,
<a href="#page380">380</a>
(<a href="#fig215"><b>215</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Somerset House, <a href="#page329">329</a>,
<a href="#page333">333</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
South Kensington Museum, new building,
<a href="#page382">382</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
University, <a href="#page357">357</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Westminster Abbey, see above.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Westminster Hall, <a href="#page233">233</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Whitehall Palace, <a href="#page329">329</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Banqueting Hall (Chapel Royal) in same,
<a href="#page329">329</a>
(<a href="#fig185"><b>185</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Longleat</span> House,
<a href="#page328">328</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Louvain</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page246">246</a>,
<a href="#page247">247</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cloth hall, <a href="#page247">247</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page248">248</a>
(<a href="#fig144"><b>144</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Lübeck.</p>
<p class="inset1">
City Gates, <a href="#page246">246</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Mary’s, <a href="#page242">242</a>,
<a href="#page244">244</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Catharine’s, <a href="#page244">244</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page246">246</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Lucca.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Campanile, <a href="#page264">264</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral (S. Martino),
<a href="#page161">161</a>,
<a href="#page257">257</a>,
<a href="#page258">258</a>,
<a href="#page260">260</a>
(<a href="#fig149"><b>149</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
tempietto in same, <a href="#page281">281</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
tomb of P. di Noceto in same,
<a href="#page281">281</a>
(<a href="#fig164"><b>164</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
S.&nbsp;Frediano, S. Michele,
<a href="#page161">161</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Minor works, <a href="#page282">282</a>,
<a href="#page283">283</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palazzo Pretorio, Pal. Bernardini,
<a href="#page283">283</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Lupiana</span> Monastery,
<a href="#page350">350</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Luxor</span>,
<a href="#page50">50</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, <a href="#page19">19</a>,
<a href="#page20">20</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Osirid Piers, <a href="#page24">24</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Luz.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church at, <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Lycia.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tombs, <a href="#page37">37</a>,
<a href="#page39">39</a>,
<a href="#page52">52</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_M" id="index_M" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Madrid</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
First Palace, <a href="#page350">350</a>.</p>
<p> New Palace, <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Madrid</span>, Château de (at Boulogne),
<a href="#page314">314</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Madura.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Choultrie of Tirumalla Nayak,
<a href="#page411">411</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Great Temple, corridors,
<a href="#page411">411</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace, <a href="#page413">413</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mafra.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace, <a href="#page353">353</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Magdeburg</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page189">189</a>,
<a href="#page242">242</a>,
<a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">444</span>
<a name="page444" id="page444"> </a>
<p class="smallcaps">Mahrisch Trübau.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Castle portal, <a href="#page338">338</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Maisons.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page322">322</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Malaga.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Alcazar, <a href="#page142">142</a>,
<a href="#page143">143</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page348">348</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Malines</span> (Mechlin).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral of St. Rombaut,
<a href="#page246">246</a>,
<a href="#page247">247</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cloth hall, <a href="#page247">247</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hôtel du Saumon, <a href="#page324">324</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Manchester.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Assize Courts, <a href="#page380">380</a>(<a href="#fig216"><b>216</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Manikyala.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tope, <a href="#page403">403</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Manresa.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Collegiate Church, <a href="#page249">249</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mantinæa.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatre, <a href="#page69">69</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mantua.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Campanile, <a href="#page264">264</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of S. Andrea, <a href="#page279">279</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Early Renaissance palaces,
<a href="#page283">283</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palazzo del Té, <a href="#page289">289</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Marburg.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Elizabeth, <a href="#page240">240</a>,
<a href="#page242">242</a>
(<a href="#fig140"><b>140</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Marienburg</span> Castle, Great Hall,
<a href="#page245">245</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Marienwerder.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Castle, <a href="#page245">245</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Marseilles.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Chapel of St. Lazare, <a href="#page310">310</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Fountain of Longchamps,
<a href="#page372">372</a>
(<a href="#fig211"><b>211</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mashita.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace of Chosroes, <a href="#page145">145</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Massachusetts.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Country house in (<a href="#fig225"><b>225</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Maulbronn.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Monastery, <a href="#page176">176</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Mayence</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page174">174</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Meaux</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page212">212</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mecca.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Kaabah, <a href="#page136">136</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Medina de Rio Seco.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Rood-screen, <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Medinet Abou.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Osirid piers, <a href="#page24">24</a>(<a href="#fig15"><b>15</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pavilion of Rameses III.,
<a href="#page26">26</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Peripteral temple, <a href="#page22">22</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tomb-temple of Rameses III.,
<a href="#page15">15</a>,
<a href="#page21">21</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Meissen.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Albrechtsburg, <a href="#page245">245</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Meroë.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pyramids, <a href="#page9">9</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Metz</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page244">244</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Meydoum.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Stepped Pyramid, <a href="#page9">9</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Milan</span>,
<a href="#page157">157</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Arcade, <a href="#page382">382</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page243">243</a>,
<a href="#page255">255</a>,
<a href="#page257">257</a>,
<a href="#page260">260</a>,
<a href="#page261">261</a>,
<a href="#page262">262</a>,
<a href="#page263">263</a>,
<a href="#page264">264</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Domical churches, <a href="#page278">278</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ospedale Maggiore, <a href="#page283">283</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Ambrogio, <a href="#page158">158</a>,
<a href="#page159">159</a>
(<a href="#fig90"><b>90</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Eustorgio, Portinari Chapel in,
<a href="#page283">283</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Satiro, sacristy of,
<a href="#page289">289</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sta. Maria delle Grazie,
<a href="#page278">278</a>,
<a href="#page289">289</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Miletus.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Apollo Didymæus,
<a href="#page53">53</a>,
<a href="#page66">66</a>
(<a href="#fig28"><b>28</b></a>,
<a href="#fig29"><b>29</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Minden</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page244">244</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mœris.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Labyrinth of, <a href="#page26">26</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Moissac.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cloister, <a href="#page170">170</a>,
<a href="#page213">213</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Monreale.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches, cathedral, <a href="#page162">162</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mons.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, St. Wandru,
<a href="#page246">246</a>,
<a href="#page247">247</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Montepulciano.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of S. Biagio, <a href="#page294">294</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Montmajour.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cloister, <a href="#page170">170</a>,
<a href="#page213">213</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mont St. Michel.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Abbey, <a href="#page167">167</a>,
<a href="#page168">168</a>,
<a href="#page213">213</a>,
<a href="#page214">214</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
cloister of same, <a href="#page213">213</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Moret.</p>
<p class="inset1">
House of Francis I., <a href="#page316">316</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Moscow.</p>
<p class="inset1">
The Kremlin, <a href="#page366">366</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Mosul</span>,
<a href="#page33">33</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mount Abu.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Jaina temples, Temple of Vimalah Sah,
<a href="#page405">405</a>,
<a href="#page406">406</a>
(<a href="#fig226"><b>226</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mount Athos.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Monastery, <a href="#page134">134</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mugheir.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Sin Or Hurki, <a href="#page30">30</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mujelibeh.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Mound, <a href="#page31">31</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mukteswara.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hindu temples, <a href="#page409">409</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mülhausen.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town Hall, <a href="#page344">344</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Munich</span>,
<a href="#page366">366</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Auekirche, <a href="#page375">375</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Basilica, <a href="#page375">375</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page240">240</a>,
<a href="#page242">242</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Glyptothek, <a href="#page359">359</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ludwigskirche, <a href="#page375">375</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Propylæa, <a href="#page360">360</a>
(<a href="#fig201"><b>201</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ruhmeshalle, <a href="#page359">359</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Michael’s, <a href="#page344">344</a>.</p>

<span class="pagenum">445</span>
<a name="page445" id="page445"> </a>
<p class="smallcaps">Münster.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church at, <a href="#page243">243</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page245">245</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Münzenberg.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Castle ruins, <a href="#page176">176</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mycenæ.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Fortifications, <a href="#page44">44</a>(<a href="#fig23"><b>23</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Lion Gate, <a href="#page44">44</a>
(<a href="#fig22"><b>22</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tholos of Atreus, <a href="#page45">45</a>,
<a href="#page46">46</a>,
<a href="#page148">148</a>
(<a href="#fig24"><b>24</b></a>,
<a href="#fig25"><b>25</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tombs, <a href="#page4">4</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Mylassa.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tomb, <a href="#page72">72</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Myra.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatre, <a href="#page69">69</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tombs, <a href="#page72">72</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_N" id="index_N" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Nakhon Wat</span></a>,
Temple of, <a href="#page413">413</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Naksh-i-roustam</span> (persepolis),
<a href="#page36">36</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tomb of Darius, <a href="#page37">37</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Nancy.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ducal Palace, <a href="#page216">216</a>,
<a href="#page311">311</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Nankin.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Porcelain Tower, <a href="#page414">414</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Naples.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Arcade, <a href="#page382">382</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Arch of Alphonso, <a href="#page287">287</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Gesù Nuovo, <a href="#page304">304</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of S. Francesco di Paola, <a href="#page305">305</a>,
<a href="#page365">365</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of S. Lorenzo, <a href="#page263">263</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of S. Severo (<a href="#fig173"><b>173</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Minor works, <a href="#page281">281</a>,
<a href="#page282">282</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pal. Gravina, Porta Capuana,
<a href="#page287">287</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Royal Museum, <a href="#page304">304</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Royal Palace, <a href="#page304">304</a>,
<a href="#page305">305</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatre of S. Carlo, <a href="#page305">305</a>,
<a href="#page365">365</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Narbonne</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page211">211</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Nassick.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Chaityas, <a href="#page404">404</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Naukratis</span>,
<a href="#page44">44</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Naumburg.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church At, <a href="#page243">243</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Netherlands</span>,
<a href="#page146">146</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gothic monuments (list),
<a href="#page252">252&ndash;253</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Neuweiler.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Peter And St. Paul,
<a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Nevers.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Étienne, <a href="#page165">165</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">New Mexico.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Spanish churches, <a href="#page388">388</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Newport.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page388">388</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Trinity Church, <a href="#page386">386</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">New York.</p>
<p class="inset1">
American Surety Building, Broadway Chambers,
<a href="#page397">397</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Casino, <a href="#page399">399</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral</p>
<p class="inset2">
of St. John the Divine, <a href="#page399">399</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of St. Patrick, <a href="#page375">375</a>,
<a href="#page391">391</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Century Club, <a href="#page399">399</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
City Hall, <a href="#page389">389</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Custom House, <a href="#page390">390</a>
(<a href="#fig221"><b>221</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Grace Church, <a href="#page392">392</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Huntington house, <a href="#page399">399</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Madison Square Garden, Metropolitan Club,
<a href="#page399">399</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Paul’s, <a href="#page386">386</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sub-Treasury, <a href="#page390">390</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Times Building, (<a href="#fig224"><b>224</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Trinity Church, <a href="#page392">392</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Vanderbilt and Villard houses,
<a href="#page399">399</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Nîmes.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Amphitheatre, <a href="#page92">92</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Maison Carrée, <a href="#page93">93</a>,
<a href="#page94">94</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Nimroud.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palaces of Assur-nazir-pal and Shalmaneser,
<a href="#page31">31</a>,
<a href="#page32">32</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Nineveh</span>,
<a href="#page31">31</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Nippur</span> (Niffer).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ruins of, <a href="#page29">29</a>,
<a href="#page31">31</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Normandy.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Romanesque churches in,
<a href="#page167">167</a>,
<a href="#page177">177</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
cathedrals in, <a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page213">213</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">North Germany.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Brick churches in, <a href="#page244">244</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">North Woburn.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Rumford House, <a href="#page387">387</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Norwich</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page177">177</a>,
<a href="#page178">178</a>,
<a href="#page220">220</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Noyon</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page200">200</a>,
<a href="#page203">203</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page246">246</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Nubia.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Early Christian buildings,
<a href="#page118">118</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Nuremberg</span>,
<a href="#page238">238</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches of St. Sebald, St. Lorenz,
<a href="#page245">245</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Funk, Hirschvogel, and Keller houses,
<a href="#page346">346</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Renaissance houses, <a href="#page345">345</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page344">344</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Shrine of St. Sebald, <a href="#page347">347</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_O" id="index_O" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Olympia</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Altis, Echo Hall, <a href="#page69">69</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Heraion, <a href="#page50">50</a>,
<a href="#page62">62</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temples, <a href="#page55">55</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
sculptures from, <a href="#page57">57</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Zeus, <a href="#page62">62</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Oppenheim.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Catharine’s, <a href="#page239">239</a>,
<a href="#page242">242</a>,
<a href="#page244">244</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Oudeypore.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hindu temples, palace,
<a href="#page409">409</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Orange.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatre, <a href="#page101">101</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Orchomenos.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ceiling, <a href="#page47">47</a></p>
<span class="pagenum">446</span>
<a name="page446" id="page446"> </a>
<p class="smallcaps">Orléans.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Houses, <a href="#page316">316</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall (hôtel de ville),
<a href="#page311">311</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Orvieto</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page257">257</a>,
<a href="#page259">259</a>,
<a href="#page261">261</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
façade of same, <a href="#page260">260</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Osnabrück.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church at, <a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Ottmarsheim.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church at, <a href="#page172">172</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Oudenärde.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page247">247</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Ourscamp.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hospital, <a href="#page214">214</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Oxford.</p>
<p class="inset1">
All Souls’ College, <a href="#page333">333</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral (Christ Church),
<a href="#page220">220</a>,
<a href="#page222">222</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Christ Church Hall, <a href="#page233">233</a>,
<a href="#page234">234</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Merton College Chapel,
<a href="#page234">234</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Radcliffe Library, <a href="#page333">333</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sheldonian Theatre, <a href="#page332">332</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_P" id="index_P" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Paderborn</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page344">344</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Padua.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Arena chapel, <a href="#page258">258</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palazzo del Consiglio,
<a href="#page287">287</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Pæstum.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Basilica, <a href="#page69">69</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temples, <a href="#page61">61</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Pailly.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page317">317</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Palermo.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches of Eremitani, La Martorana,
<a href="#page162">162</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Palmyra</span>,
<a href="#page83">83</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of the Sun, <a href="#page92">92</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ceiling panels (<a href="#fig50"><b>50</b> <i>a</i></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Parasnatha.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Jaina temples, <a href="#page407">407</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Paris.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Arch of Triumph of the Carrousel,
<a href="#page362">362</a>,
<a href="#page363">363</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of l’Étoile, <a href="#page362">362</a>,
<a href="#page363">363</a>
(<a href="#fig204"><b>204</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Bourse (Exchange), <a href="#page363">363</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral (Notre Dame),
<a href="#page189">189</a>,
<a href="#page197">197&ndash;202</a>,
<a href="#page249">249</a>
(<a href="#fig116"><b>116</b></a>,
<a href="#fig117"><b>117</b></a>,
<a href="#fig124"><b>124</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
rose windows, <a href="#page203">203</a>,
<a href="#page212">212</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
chapels, <a href="#page205">205</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
size, <a href="#page206">206</a>,
<a href="#page232">232</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
west front, <a href="#page207">207</a>,
<a href="#page227">227</a>
(<a href="#fig124"><b>124</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
capital from (<a href="#fig126"><b>126</b>
<i>b</i></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
early carving (<a href="#fig114"><ins class="correction" title="text has ‘122’"><b>114</b></ins></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Churches</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Chapel and Dome of the Invalides, <a href="#page321">321</a>
(<a href="#fig182"><b>182</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
Madeleine, <a href="#page362">362</a>,
<a href="#page363">363</a>
(<a href="#fig205"><b>205</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
Panthéon, <a href="#page361">361</a>,
<a href="#page362">362</a>
(<a href="#fig202"><b>202</b></a>,
<a href="#fig203"><b>203</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sacré-Cœur at Montmartre,
<a href="#page373">373</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sainte Chapelle, <a href="#page185">185</a>,
<a href="#page203">203</a>,
<a href="#page224">224</a>
(<a href="#fig106"><b>106</b></a>,
<a href="#fig121"><b>121</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset3">
capital from same (<a href="#fig126"><b>126</b>
<i>a</i></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sorbonne, <a href="#page319">319</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Augustin, <a href="#page371">371</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Ste. Clothilde, <a href="#page371">371</a>,
<a href="#page375">375</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Étienne-du-Mont, St. Eustache,
<a href="#page312">312</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Jean de Belleville,
<a href="#page371">371</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Merri, St. Sévérin,
<a href="#page213">213</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Paul-St. Louis, <a href="#page319">319</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Sulpice, <a href="#page323">323</a>,
<a href="#page361">361</a>
(<a href="#fig183"><b>183</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Vincent-de-Paul, <a href="#page364">364</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Val-de-Grâce, <a href="#page322">322</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Collège Chaptal, <a href="#page371">371</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Colonnades of the Garde-Meuble,
<a href="#page361">361</a>,
<a href="#page367">367</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Column of July (Colonne Juillet),
<a href="#page365">365</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Corps Législatif (Palais Bourbon),
<a href="#page363">363</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
École des Beaux-Arts, <a href="#page355">355</a>,
<a href="#page370">370</a>,
<a href="#page392">392</a>,
<a href="#page393">393</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
library of same, <a href="#page364">364</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
door (<a href="#fig206"><b>206</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
École de Médecine, new buildings,
<a href="#page374">374</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Exhibition buildings, <a href="#page374">374</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Fountains</span>:&mdash;
of Cuvier, Molière, St. Michel, <a href="#page372">372</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Halles Centrales, <a href="#page371">371</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hôtel-de-Ville (town hall),
<a href="#page316">316</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
new building, <a href="#page373">373</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Hôtels</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Carnavalet (de Ligeris), <a href="#page316">316</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
de Cluny, <a href="#page216">216</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
des Invalides, <a href="#page321">321</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
House of Francis&nbsp;I. (Maison François I.),
<a href="#page316">316</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Library of the Beaux-Arts,
<a href="#page364">364</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Ste. Genéviève, <a href="#page365">365</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Louvre (see palaces). Museum (Musée) Galliéra (<a href="#fig212"><b>212</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Opera House (Nouvel Opéra),
<a href="#page372">372</a>
(<a href="#fig210"><b>210</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Palaces</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Palais Bourbon (Corps Législatif), <a href="#page363">363</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Palais de l’Industrie, <a href="#page364">364</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Pal. de Justice, <a href="#page364">364</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Louvre and Tuileries, <a href="#page215">215</a>,
<a href="#page315">315&ndash;319</a>,
<a href="#page321">321</a>,
<a href="#page362">362</a>,
<a href="#page371">371</a>,
<a href="#page372">372</a>
(<a href="#fig179"><b>179</b></a>,
<a href="#fig208"><b>208</b></a>,
<a href="#fig209"><b>209</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
Luxemburg Palace, <a href="#page318">318</a>
(<a href="#fig180"><b>180</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Places</span> (Squares):&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
de la Concorde, <a href="#page324">324</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Royale, <a href="#page319">319</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Vendôme, <a href="#page322">322</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Railway stations (du Nord, de l’Est, d’Orléans),
<a href="#page372">372</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sorbonne, new academic buildings,
<a href="#page374">374</a>.</p>

<span class="pagenum">447</span>
<a name="page447" id="page447"> </a>
<p class="smallcaps">Paulinzelle.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Romanesque church, <a href="#page173">173</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Pavia</span>,
<a href="#page157">157</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Certosa, <a href="#page255">255</a>,
<a href="#page262">262</a>,
<a href="#page263">263</a>,
<a href="#page278">278</a>,
<a href="#page283">283</a>,
<a href="#page284">284</a>
(<a href="#fig152"><b>152</b></a>,
<a href="#fig153"><b>153</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of S. Michele, <a href="#page159">159</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Domical churches, <a href="#page278">278</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Pekin.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Summer pavilion, Temple of Great Dragon,
<a href="#page414">414</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Pergamon</span> (Pergamus).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Altar of Eumenes II., <a href="#page67">67</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Christian buildings, <a href="#page118">118</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Perigueux.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Front, <a href="#page164">164</a>(<a href="#fig94"><b>94</b></a>,
<a href="#fig95"><b>95</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Peroor.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, <a href="#page411">411</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Persepolis</span>,
<a href="#page145">145</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Columns, <a href="#page37">37</a>,
<a href="#page38">38</a>
(<a href="#fig21"><b>21</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hall of Xerxes, <a href="#page36">36</a>,
<a href="#page37">37</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palaces, <a href="#page35">35</a>,
<a href="#page69">69</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Persia.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Moslem architecture, <a href="#page145">145</a>,
<a href="#page146">146</a>
(list <a href="#page154">154</a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sassanian buildings, <a href="#page144">144</a>,
<a href="#page145">145</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Perugia.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Oratory of San Bernardino,
<a href="#page279">279</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall (Pal. Communale),
<a href="#page266">266</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Roman Gates, <a href="#page88">88</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Peterborough</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page178">178</a>,
<a href="#page220">220</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
retro-choir, <a href="#page222">222</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
west front, <a href="#page227">227</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Phigalæa</span> (Bassæ).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gate, <a href="#page45">45</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sculptures from, <a href="#page57">57</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Apollo Epicurius,
<a href="#page65">65</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Philadelphia.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Christ Church, <a href="#page386">386</a>(<a href="#fig218"><b>218</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Girard College, <a href="#page390">390</a>,
<a href="#page391">391</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Independence Hall, <a href="#page388">388</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Marine Exchange, Mint,
<a href="#page390">390</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Municipal Building, <a href="#page391">391</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Philæ.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Great Temple, <a href="#page22">22</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Peripteral temple, <a href="#page22">22</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Piacenza</span>,
<a href="#page157">157</a>. Campanile,
<a href="#page159">159</a>
(<a href="#fig91"><b>91</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral (<a href="#fig91"><b>91</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page266">266</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Piastenschloss</span> at Brieg,
<a href="#page343">343</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Pienza.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palazzo Piccolomini, etc.,
<a href="#page282">282</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Pierrefonds.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page371">371</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Pisa.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches in, <a href="#page115">115</a>,
<a href="#page261">261</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
minor works in, <a href="#page282">282</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
early Renaissance in,
<a href="#page282">282&ndash;283</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Baptistery, <a href="#page160">160</a>
(<a href="#fig92"><b>92</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral (Duomo), <a href="#page159">159</a>,
<a href="#page160">160</a>,
<a href="#page276">276</a>
(<a href="#fig92"><b>92</b></a>,
<a href="#fig93"><b>93</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Leaning Tower, <a href="#page160">160</a>
(<a href="#fig92"><b>92</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sta. Maria della Spina,
<a href="#page264">264</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Pistoia.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Campanile, <a href="#page264">264</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches, <a href="#page161">161</a>,
<a href="#page261">261</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Podestà, Palazzo Communale,
<a href="#page266">266</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sta. Maria dell’ Umiltà,
<a href="#page293">293</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Pittsburgh.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Carnegie Building, <a href="#page397">397</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Carnegie Library, <a href="#page399">399</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
County Buildings, <a href="#page394">394</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Plagnitz.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Castle, <a href="#page343">343</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Plassenburg.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Castle, <a href="#page343">343</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Poitiers</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page201">201</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Pola.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Amphitheatre, <a href="#page92">92</a>,
<a href="#page102">102</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Pompeii.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Amphitheatre, <a href="#page92">92</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Baths, <a href="#page86">86</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Houses, <a href="#page72">72</a>,
<a href="#page107">107</a>,
<a href="#page108">108</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
House of Pansa (<a href="#fig65"><b>65</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatre, <a href="#page101">101</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tombs, <a href="#page105">105</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Pont Du Gard.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Bridge, <a href="#page108">108</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Portsmouth.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sherburne House, <a href="#page387">387</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Portugal</span>,
<a href="#page352">352</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gothic monuments (list), <a href="#page253">253</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Potsdam.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Nicholas Church, <a href="#page359">359</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Prague.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Belvedere, <a href="#page339">339</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page239">239</a>,
<a href="#page242">242</a>,
<a href="#page244">244</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace on Hradschin, Schloss Stern, Waldstein palace,
<a href="#page339">339</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Prato.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Churches in, <a href="#page161">161</a>,
<a href="#page293">293</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Madonna delle Carceri,
<a href="#page278">278</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Prentzlau.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page244">244</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Priene.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ionic order, <a href="#page53">53</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Propylæa, <a href="#page69">69</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Provence</span>,
<a href="#page164">164</a>.</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Provins.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Houses at, <a href="#page214">214</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Puri.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temples, <a href="#page408">408</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Jugganât, <a href="#page409">409</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Purudkul.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Rock-cut raths, <a href="#page413">413</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">448</span>
<a name="page448" id="page448"> </a>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_R" id="index_R" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Ramesseum</span></a>
(Thebes). Tomb-temple of Rameses II.,
<a href="#page15">15</a>,
<a href="#page21">21</a>,
<a href="#page24">24</a>
(<a href="#fig8"><b>8</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Ramisseram.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, corridors, <a href="#page411">411</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Ratisbon</span> (Regensburg) Cathedral,
<a href="#page239">239</a>,
<a href="#page241">241</a>,
<a href="#page244">244</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page245">245</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Walhalla, <a href="#page359">359</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Ravenna</span>,
<a href="#page114">114</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Baptistery of St. John,
<a href="#page119">119</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Byzantine monuments (list),
<a href="#page134">134</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page304">304</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Early Christian monuments (list),
<a href="#page119">119</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
S.&nbsp;Apollinare Nuovo, S. Apollinare in Classe,
<a href="#page114">114</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Vitale, <a href="#page117">117</a>,
<a href="#page122">122</a>,
<a href="#page127">127</a>,
<a href="#page172">172</a>
(<a href="#fig73"><b>73</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Reggio.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Amphitheatre, <a href="#page92">92</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Reims</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page189">189</a>,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page201">201</a>,
<a href="#page202">202</a>,
<a href="#page203">203</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
size, <a href="#page206">206</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
west front, <a href="#page207">207</a>,
<a href="#page213">213</a>,
<a href="#page227">227</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
towers, <a href="#page209">209</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
portals, <a href="#page208">208</a>,
<a href="#page210">210</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Rimini.</p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Francesco, <a href="#page277">277</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Rochester</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page220">220</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Rodez</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page212">212</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Rome.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ancient monuments, (list) <a href="#page108">108</a>,
<a href="#page109">109</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Amphitheatre of Statilius Taurus,
<a href="#page102">102</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Arches</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
in general, <a href="#page77">77</a>,
<a href="#page103">103</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Constantine, <a href="#page80">80</a>,
<a href="#page103">103</a>
(<a href="#fig63"><b>63</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Septimius Severus, <a href="#page103">103</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Titus, <a href="#page92">92</a>,
<a href="#page103">103</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Trajan, <a href="#page97">97</a>,
<a href="#page103">103</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Basilicas</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
in general, <a href="#page97">97</a>,
<a href="#page98">98</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Basilica Æmilia, <a href="#page98">98</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Constantine, xxiii,
<a href="#page80">80</a>,
<a href="#page82">82</a>,
<a href="#page98">98</a>,
<a href="#page99">99</a>
(<a href="#fig50"><b>50</b> <i>b</i></a>,
<a href="#fig58"><b>58</b></a>,
<a href="#fig59"><b>59</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
Julian Basilica, <a href="#page98">98</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sempronian, <a href="#page98">98</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Ulpian, <a href="#page97">97</a>,
<a href="#page98">98</a>
(<a href="#fig57"><b>57</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset2">
(For Early Christian Basilicas, see Churches.)</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Baths</span> (Thermæ):&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
in general, <a href="#page71">71</a>,
<a href="#page92">92</a>,
<a href="#page99">99</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Agrippa, <a href="#page91">91</a>,
<a href="#page100">100</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Caracalla, <a href="#page87">87</a>,
<a href="#page92">92</a>
(<a href="#fig60"><b>60</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Diocletian, <a href="#page92">92</a>,
<a href="#page100">100</a>,
<a href="#page101">101</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Titus, <a href="#page86">86</a>,
<a href="#page91">91</a>,
<a href="#page100">100</a>,
<a href="#page105">105</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Campanile of Campidoglio (Capitol),
<a href="#page305">305</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Capitol, <a href="#page91">91</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
palaces on, <a href="#page299">299</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Churches</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
in general, <a href="#page293">293</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Church of Gesù, <a href="#page299">299</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sistine Chapel of Vatican,
<a href="#page286">286</a>,
<a href="#page289">289</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sta. Agnese</p>
<p class="inset3">
(basilica), <a href="#page112">112</a></p>
<p class="inset3">
(modern church), <a href="#page303">303</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
S. Agostino, <a href="#page286">286</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
S. Clemente, <a href="#page114">114</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sta. Costanza, <a href="#page111">111</a>
(<a href="#fig66"><b>66</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. John Lateran, <a href="#page113">113</a>,
<a href="#page251">251</a>,
<a href="#page304">304</a>,
<a href="#page305">305</a>;</p>
<p class="inset3">
cloister of same, <a href="#page281">281</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
S. Lorenzo, <a href="#page112">112</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
S.&nbsp;Lorenzo in Miranda,
<a href="#page93">93</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sta. Maria degli Angeli,
<a href="#page101">101</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sta. Maria Maggiore, <a href="#page113">113</a>,
<a href="#page305">305</a>;</p>
<p class="inset3">
Chapel of Sixtus V. in same,
<a href="#page299">299</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sta. Maria del Popolo,
<a href="#page286">286</a>,
<a href="#page287">287</a>;</p>
<p class="inset3">
Chigi Chapel in same, <a href="#page293">293</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sta. Maria della Vittoria,
<a href="#page303">303</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sta. Maria sopra Minerva,
<a href="#page256">256</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Paul-beyond-the-Walls,
<a href="#page113">113</a>,
<a href="#page281">281</a>
(<a href="#fig67"><b>67</b></a>,
<a href="#fig68"><b>68</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Peter’s, original basilica,
<a href="#page113">113</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
existing church of, <a href="#page274">274</a>,
<a href="#page286">286</a>,
<a href="#page289">289</a>,
<a href="#page290">290</a>,
<a href="#page294">294&ndash;296</a>,
<a href="#page299">299</a>,
<a href="#page321">321</a>
(<a href="#fig169"><b>169</b></a>,
<a href="#fig170"><b>170</b></a>,
<a href="#fig171"><b>171</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset3">
colonnade of same, <a href="#page295">295</a>,
<a href="#page303">303</a>,
<a href="#page367">367</a>;</p>
<p class="inset3">
sacristy of same, <a href="#page305">305</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
S. Pietro in Montorio, Tempietto in court of,
<a href="#page209">209</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Circuses</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Maximus, <a href="#page103">103</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Caligula and Nero, <a href="#page103">103</a>,
<a href="#page113">113</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cloaca Maxima, <a href="#page81">81</a>,
<a href="#page90">90</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Colosseum (Flavian amphitheatre) <a href="#page91">91</a>,
<a href="#page92">92</a>,
<a href="#page102">102</a>
(<a href="#fig45"><b>45</b></a>,
<a href="#fig62"><b>62</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Columns</span>:&mdash;
<a href="#page103">103</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Marcus Aurelius, <a href="#page104">104</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Trajan, <a href="#page97">97</a>,
<a href="#page104">104</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Early Christian monuments,
<a href="#page111">111</a>; (list),
<a href="#page118">118</a>,
<a href="#page119">119</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Fora</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
in general, <a href="#page97">97</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Augustus, <a href="#page91">91</a>,
<a href="#page97">97</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Julius, Nerva, Vespasian,
<a href="#page97">97</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Forum Romanum (Magnum),
<a href="#page97">97</a>,
<a href="#page98">98</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Forum of Trajan, <a href="#page97">97</a>,
<a href="#page98">98</a>
(<a href="#fig57"><b>57</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Fountain of Trevi, <a href="#page305">305</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Houses</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
in general, <a href="#page105">105</a>,
<a href="#page106">106</a>,
<a href="#page108">108</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Vestals (Atrium Vestæ),
<a href="#page94">94</a>,
<a href="#page106">106</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Livia, <a href="#page107">107</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Lateran, carved ornament from Museum of (<a href="#fig49"><b>49</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
palace of, <a href="#page300">300</a>.</p>

<span class="pagenum">449</span>
<a name="page449" id="page449"> </a>
<p class="inset1">
Mausoleum of Augustus, of Hadrian,
<a href="#page104">104</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Minor Works in Rome, <a href="#page287">287</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Monument to Victor Emmanuel,
<a href="#page382">382</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
National Museum, <a href="#page382">382</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Palaces</span> (Ancient):&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Cæsars on Palatine Hill, <a href="#page86">86</a>,
<a href="#page91">91</a>,
<a href="#page105">105</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Nero (Golden House),
<a href="#page91">91</a>,
<a href="#page92">92</a>,
<a href="#page100">100</a>,
<a href="#page105">105</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Septizonium, <a href="#page105">105</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Palaces</span> (Renaissance):&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Altemps, <a href="#page292">292</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Barberini, <a href="#page304">304</a>,
<a href="#page305">305</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Borghese, <a href="#page304">304</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Braschi, <a href="#page305">305</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Capitol, <a href="#page299">299</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Cancelleria, <a href="#page290">290</a>,
<a href="#page291">291</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Corsini, <a href="#page305">305</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Farnese, <a href="#page292">292</a>
(<a href="#fig167"><b>167</b></a>,
<a href="#fig168"><b>168</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
Farnesina, <a href="#page291">291</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Giraud, <a href="#page290">290</a>,
<a href="#page291">291</a>
(<a href="#fig166"><b>166</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
Lante, <a href="#page292">292</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Massimi, Palma, <a href="#page291">291</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Quirinal, <a href="#page300">300</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sacchetti, <a href="#page291">291</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Vatican, Belvedere, greater and lesser court, Court of S.&nbsp;Damaso,
Loggie,
<a href="#page209">209</a>,
<a href="#page291">291</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Braccio Nuovo, <a href="#page305">305</a>,
<a href="#page365">365</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Casino del Papa in gardens,
<a href="#page293">293</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
papal residence, <a href="#page300">300</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Scala Reggia, <a href="#page305">305</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
palazzo di Venezia, <a href="#page286">286</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pantheon of Agrippa, <a href="#page82">82</a>,
<a href="#page91">91</a>,
<a href="#page94">94&ndash;96</a>,
<a href="#page100">100</a>,
<a href="#page118">118</a>,
<a href="#page122">122</a>,
<a href="#page127">127</a>,
<a href="#page365">365</a>
(<a href="#fig54"><b>54</b></a>,
<a href="#fig55"><b>55</b></a>,
<a href="#fig56"><b>56</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pons Ælius (Ponte S. Angelo),
<a href="#page108">108</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Porta Maggiore, <a href="#page108">108</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Portico of Octavia, <a href="#page91">91</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Temples</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Of Castor and Pollux (Dioscuri), <a href="#page84">84</a>,
<a href="#page91">91</a>,
<a href="#page94">94</a>
(<a href="#fig44"><b>44</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Concord, <a href="#page94">94</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Faustina, <a href="#page93">93</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Fortuna Virilis, <a href="#page89">89</a>,
<a href="#page90">90</a>,
<a href="#page93">93</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Hercules or Vesta, <a href="#page90">90</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Julius, <a href="#page94">94</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Jupiter Capitolinus,
<a href="#page68">68</a>,
<a href="#page89">89</a>,
<a href="#page91">91</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Jupiter Stator, so called (see Temple of Castor and Pollux);</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Jupiter Tonans, <a href="#page91">91</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Mars Ultor, <a href="#page91">91</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Minerva Medica, <a href="#page127">127</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Peace, <a href="#page98">98</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Trajan, <a href="#page97">97</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Venus and Rome, <a href="#page94">94</a>
(<a href="#fig53"><b>53</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Vesta, in Forum, <a href="#page94">94</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Vesta, so called, or Hercules,
<a href="#page90">90</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Theatres</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Of Marcellus, <a href="#page91">91</a>,
<a href="#page101">101</a>
(<a href="#fig42"><b>42</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Mummius, of Pompey,
<a href="#page101">101</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Tombs</span>:&mdash;
<a href="#page86">86</a>,
<a href="#page104">104</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Caius Cestius, of Cecilia Metella,
<a href="#page104">104</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Helena, <a href="#page118">118</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Rosenborg</span> Castle,
<a href="#page336">336</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Rosheim.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church façade, <a href="#page175">175</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Rothenburg.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page344">344</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Rouen</span>,
<a href="#page310">310</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page192">192</a>,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page201">201</a>,
<a href="#page202">202</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
size of, <a href="#page206">206</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
west front, <a href="#page207">207</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
rose windows, <a href="#page212">212</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hôtel Bourgtheroude, <a href="#page316">316</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palais de Justice, <a href="#page214">214</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Maclou, <a href="#page209">209</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Ouen, <a href="#page212">212</a>,
<a href="#page213">213</a>,
<a href="#page375">375</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
rose window from (<a href="#fig112"><b>112</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Rouheiha.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Early Christian church,
<a href="#page117">117</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Royal Domain</span>,
<a href="#page166">166</a>,
<a href="#page167">167</a>,
<a href="#page197">197</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Ruanwalli.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Topes, <a href="#page403">403</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Russia</span>,
<a href="#page367">367</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Byzantine monuments (list),
<a href="#page134">134</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_S" id="index_S" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Sadri</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple, <a href="#page406">406</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Sakkarah.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pyramid, <a href="#page9">9</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Salamanca.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Casa de las Conchas, <a href="#page349">349</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral (old), <a href="#page180">180</a>,
<a href="#page248">248</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
(new), <a href="#page250">250</a>,
<a href="#page348">348</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Monastery of S. Girolamo,
<a href="#page348">348</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Domingo, <a href="#page348">348</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
University, <a href="#page349">349</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
portal of (<a href="#fig195"><b>195</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Salisbury</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page219">219</a>,
<a href="#page223">223</a>,
<a href="#page225">225</a>,
<a href="#page229">229</a>,
<a href="#page232">232</a>
(<a href="#fig128"><b>128</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
west front, <a href="#page228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
spire, <a href="#page228">228</a>,
<a href="#page229">229</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Market cross, <a href="#page234">234</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Salonica.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. George, <a href="#page118">118</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Other monuments (list),
<a href="#page134">134</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Salsette.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Viharas, <a href="#page405">405</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Salzburg.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Francis,
<a href="#page242">242</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Samos.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gate, <a href="#page45">45</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Sanchi.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Brahman temple, <a href="#page404">404</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tope, <a href="#page403">403</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">450</span>
<a name="page450" id="page450"> </a>
<p class="smallcaps">San Ildefonso.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Royal Palace, <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Sabagossa.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Casa de Zaporta, <a href="#page350">350</a>(<a href="#fig196"><b>196</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Saxony</span>,
<a href="#page173">173</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Schalaburg.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Castle, <a href="#page339">339</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Schlettstadt</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page239">239</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Schloss Hämelschenburg</span>,
<a href="#page343">343</a>
(<a href="#fig191"><b>191</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Schloss Porzia</span> at Spital,
<a href="#page338">338</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Schloss Stern</span> at Prague,
<a href="#page339">339</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Schwarz-Rheindorf.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page174">174</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Schweinfürth.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page344">344</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Scinde</span>,
<a href="#page146">146</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Secundra.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tomb of Akbar, <a href="#page148">148</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Sedinga.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hathoric columns, <a href="#page24">24</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Séez</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Segovia</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page190">190</a>,
<a href="#page249">249</a>,
<a href="#page348">348</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of S. Millan, of Templars,
<a href="#page180">180</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Selinus.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temples, <a href="#page49">49</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
northern temple, <a href="#page60">60</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Temple of Zeus, <a href="#page61">61</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Semneh.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pavilion, <a href="#page26">26</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Senlis</span> Cathedral, <a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page200">200</a>,
<a href="#page209">209</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Sens.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Archbishop’s palace, <a href="#page317">317</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page203">203</a>,
<a href="#page219">219</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Serbistan.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sassanian buildings, <a href="#page144">144</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Seville.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Alcazar, <a href="#page142">142</a>,
<a href="#page143">143</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Casa de Pilato (House of Pilate),
<a href="#page142">142</a>,
<a href="#page350">350</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page244">244</a>,
<a href="#page250">250</a>,
<a href="#page257">257</a>,
<a href="#page351">351</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Giralda, <a href="#page142">142</a>,
<a href="#page143">143</a>,
<a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Sheepree.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Pathan arches, <a href="#page148">148</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Sienna.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Brick houses, <a href="#page266">266</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Campanile, <a href="#page264">264</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral (Duomo), <a href="#page257">257</a>,
<a href="#page259">259</a>,
<a href="#page263">263</a>
(<a href="#fig150"><b>150</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
west front, <a href="#page260">260</a>
(<a href="#fig151"><b>151</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Loggia del Papa, <a href="#page282">282</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Minor works, <a href="#page282">282</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Palaces</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Del Governo, Piccolomini, Spannocchi, <a href="#page282">282</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Palazzo Pubblico, <a href="#page266">266</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Renaissance churches, <a href="#page293">293</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Giovanni in Fonte, <a href="#page260">260</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Silsileh.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Grotto temple, <a href="#page22">22</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Soissons</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page200">200</a>,
<a href="#page203">203</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page243">243</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Somnath.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Jaina temple, <a href="#page407">407</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Somnathpur.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Chalukyan temples, <a href="#page409">409</a>,
<a href="#page410">410</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Southwell</span> Minster, carving from, (<a
href="#fig115"><b>115</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Spain</span>,
<a href="#page347">347</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gothic monuments (list),
<a href="#page253">253</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Romanesque churches,
<a href="#page179">179&ndash;180</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Spalato.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace of Diocletian, <a href="#page92">92</a>,
<a href="#page106">106</a>,
<a href="#page113">113</a>
(<a href="#fig64"><b>64</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Spital.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Schloss Porzia, <a href="#page338">338</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Spires</span> (Speyer) Cathedral,
<a href="#page174">174</a>
(<a href="#fig100"><b>100</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">St. Alban’s</span> Abbey, tombs, etc., in,
<a href="#page234">234</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">St. Augustine.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Fort Marion (S. Marco),
<a href="#page388">388</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ponce de Leon Hotel, <a href="#page399">399</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Roman Catholic cathedral,
<a href="#page388">388</a>.</p>

<p class="smallcaps">St. Benoît-sur-Loire.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Antechurch, <a href="#page177">177</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">St. Denis.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Abbey, <a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page198">198</a>,
<a href="#page200">200</a>,
<a href="#page202">202</a>,
<a href="#page203">203</a>
(<a href="#fig120"><b>120</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
tomb of Louis XII. in,
<a href="#page316">316</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Francis I., <a href="#page317">317</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">St. Germain-en-Laye.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Château,
<a href="#page313">313</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Royal chapel in, <a href="#page204">204</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">St. Gilles.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page165">165</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">St. Louis.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Union Trust Bdg., <a href="#page397">397</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">St. Paul.</p>
<p class="inset1">
State Capitol, <a href="#page400">400</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">St. Petersburg</span>,
<a href="#page366">366</a>,
<a href="#page367">367</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Admiralty, <a href="#page367">367</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral of St. Isaac,
<a href="#page367">367</a>
(<a href="#fig207"><b>207</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Churches</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of the Citadel, of the Greek Rite, <a href="#page366">366</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Our Lady of Kazan, <a href="#page367">367</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
New Museum, Palace of Grand Duke Michael,
<a href="#page367">367</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Smolnoy Monastery, <a href="#page366">366</a>.</p>

<p class="smallcaps">St. Rémy.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tombs, <a href="#page105">105</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Stabiæ</span>,
<a href="#page92">92</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Stockholm.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace, <a href="#page337">337</a></p>
<span class="pagenum">451</span>
<a name="page451" id="page451"> </a>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Strasburg</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page243">243</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
spire of, <a href="#page238">238</a>,
<a href="#page240">240</a>,
<a href="#page241">241</a>,
<a href="#page243">243</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
University Buildings, <a href="#page376">376</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Stuttgart.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Old Castle, <a href="#page343">343</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Technical School, <a href="#page376">376</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Styria</span>,
<a href="#page339">339</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Sully.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page317">317</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Sultaniyeh.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Tomb, <a href="#page145">145</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Sunium.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Propylæa, <a href="#page69">69</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Susa</span>,
<a href="#page145">145</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palaces, <a href="#page35">35</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Syracuse.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Theatre, <a href="#page70">70</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Syria</span>,
<a href="#page122">122</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
early Christian churches in,
<a href="#page115">115</a>,
<a href="#page116">116</a>,
<a href="#page117">117</a>; (list),
<a href="#page119">119</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_T" id="index_T" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Tabriz</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ruined Mosque, <a href="#page145">145</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Tafkhah.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Early <ins class="correction" title="text reads ‘Christain’">Christian</ins> Church,
<a href="#page117">117</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Takht-i-Bahi.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Monastery, <a href="#page405">405</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Tängermünde.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page244">244</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Tanjore.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Great temple, <a href="#page412">412</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace, <a href="#page413">413</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Shrine of Soubramanya,
<a href="#page412">412</a>
(<a href="#fig229"><b>229</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Tarputry.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gopura, <a href="#page411">411</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Teheran</span>,
<a href="#page146">146</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Tel-el-Amarna</span>,
<a href="#page27">27</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Tewkesbury</span> Abbey,
<a href="#page222">222</a>
(<a href="#fig130"><b>130</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Thebes.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Amenopheum, <a href="#page15">15</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ramesseum, <a href="#page15">15</a>
(<a href="#fig8"><b>8</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Thoricus.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gate, <a href="#page45">45</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
Stoa Diple, <a href="#page69">69</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Tinnevelly.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Dravidian temples, <a href="#page411">411</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Tiruvalur.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Dravidian temples, <a href="#page411">411</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Tiryns</span>,
<a href="#page44">44</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Tivoli.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Circular temple, <a href="#page90">90</a>,
<a href="#page356">356</a>
(<a href="#fig52"><b>52</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Villas</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
D’Este, <a href="#page293">293</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Hadrian, <a href="#page87">87</a>,
<a href="#page106">106</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Tokio.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Great Palace, <a href="#page415">415</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Toledo.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Archbishop’s Palace, <a href="#page360">360</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page189">189</a>,
<a href="#page248">248</a>,
<a href="#page348">348</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gate of S. Martino, <a href="#page350">350</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hospital of Sta. Cruz,
<a href="#page349">349</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Juan de los Reyes, <a href="#page251">251</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Tonnerre.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hospital, <a href="#page214">214</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Torgau.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Hartenfels Castle, <a href="#page342">342</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Toro.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Collegiate church, <a href="#page180">180</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Toulouse</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page212">212</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Sernin, <a href="#page204">204</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Houses, <a href="#page317">317</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Tournay</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page190">190</a>,
<a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page209">209</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
rood-screen in, <a href="#page335">335</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Tours</span>,
<a href="#page310">310</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>,
<a href="#page209">209</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
towers of, <a href="#page312">312</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
tomb of children of Charles VIII. in,
<a href="#page310">310</a>,
<a href="#page342">342</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Trausnitz</span> Castle,
<a href="#page342">342</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Treves</span> (Trier).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page174">174</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Frauenkirche (Liebfrauenkirche, Church of Our Lady),
<a href="#page189">189</a>,
<a href="#page242">242</a>,
<a href="#page243">243</a>
(<a href="#fig142"><b>142</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Troyes</span></p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page197">197</a>,
<a href="#page201">201</a>,
<a href="#page205">205</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
size, <a href="#page206">206</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
west portals, <a href="#page209">209</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Urbain, <a href="#page212">212</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Tucson.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page352">352</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Tuparamaya.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Topes, <a href="#page403">403</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Turin.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of La Superga, <a href="#page365">365</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Turkey</span>,
<a href="#page149">149</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Monuments (list), <a href="#page154">154</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Tusculum.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Amphitheatre, <a href="#page92">92</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Tyrol</span>,
<a href="#page338">338</a>,
<a href="#page339">339</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_U" id="index_U" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Udaipur</span></a>
(near Bhilsa). Hindu temples,
<a href="#page409">409</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Ulm</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page238">238</a>,
<a href="#page239">239</a>,
<a href="#page241">241</a>,
<a href="#page243">243</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
spire, <a href="#page241">241</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Ur</span>,
<a href="#page30">30</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Urbino.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ducal palace, <a href="#page287">287</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Utrecht</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page244">244</a></p>

<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_V" id="index_V" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Valencia</span></a> Cathedral,
<a href="#page249">249</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Valladolid.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral, <a href="#page350">350</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Gregorio, portal (<a href="#fig146"><b>146</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Vellore.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gopura, <a href="#page411">411</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Vendôme</span> Cathedral, portal,
<a href="#page209">209</a></p>

<span class="pagenum">452</span>
<a name="page452" id="page452"> </a>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Venetia</span>,
<a href="#page157">157</a>,
<a href="#page262">262</a>,
<a href="#page305">305</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Venice</span>,
<a href="#page300">300</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Campaniles of St. Mark, of S. Giorgio Maggiore,
<a href="#page305">305</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Churches</span>:&mdash;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Frari (S. M. Gloriosa dei Frari),
<a href="#page256">256</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Redentore, <a href="#page299">299</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
S. Giobbe, <a href="#page284">284</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
S. Giorgio dei Grechi,
<a href="#page293">293</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
S. Giorgio Maggiore, <a href="#page299">299</a>,
<a href="#page305">305</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
SS. Giovanni e Paolo, <a href="#page256">256</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Sta. Maria Formosa, <a href="#page293">293</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
S. M. dei Miracoli, <a href="#page283">283</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
S. M. della Salute, <a href="#page304">304</a>,
(<a href="#fig174"><b>174</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
St. Mark’s, <a href="#page132">132</a>,
<a href="#page164">164</a>
(<a href="#fig78"><b>78</b></a>,
<a href="#fig79"><b>79</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset3">
Library of same (Royal Palace),
<a href="#page301">301</a>
(<a href="#fig172"><b>172</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
S. Salvatore, <a href="#page293">293</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
S. Zaccaria, <a href="#page284">284</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Doge’s Palace, <a href="#page267">267</a>,
<a href="#page284">284</a>
(<a href="#fig157"><b>157</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Minor works, <a href="#page287">287</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Palaces</span>:&mdash;
<a href="#page267">267</a>,
<a href="#page283">283</a>,
<a href="#page284">284</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Cà d’Oro, Cavalli, Contarini-Fasan,
<a href="#page268">268</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Cornaro (Corner de Cà Grande) <a href="#page301">301</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Dario, <a href="#page285">285</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Ducale (Doge’s Palace),
<a href="#page267">267</a>,
<a href="#page284">284</a>
(<a href="#fig157"><b>157</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
Foscari, <a href="#page268">268</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Grimani, <a href="#page300">300</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Pesaro, <a href="#page304">304</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Pisani, <a href="#page268">268</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Rezzonico, <a href="#page304">304</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Vendramini (Vendramin-Calergi),
<a href="#page284">284</a>,
<a href="#page285">285</a>
(<a href="#fig165"><b>165</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset2">
Zorzi, capital, <a href="#page275">275</a>
(<a href="#fig158"><b>158</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Vercelli.</p>
<p class="inset1">
S. Andrea, <a href="#page256">256</a>,
<a href="#page263">263</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Verneuil.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Château, <a href="#page317">317</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Verona</span>,
<a href="#page157">157</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Amphitheatre, <a href="#page92">92</a>,
<a href="#page102">102</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Campanile, <a href="#page264">264</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church</p>
<p class="inset2">
of Sta. Anastasia, <a href="#page256">256</a>,
<a href="#page258">258</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
of S. Zeno, <a href="#page159">159</a>,
<a href="#page175">175</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Palaces</span>:&mdash;
<a href="#page283">283</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Bevilacqua, Canossa, <a href="#page300">300</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
del Consiglio, <a href="#page286">286</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Pompeii, Verzi, <a href="#page300">300</a>.</p>
<p class="inset2">
Tombs of Scaligers, <a href="#page264">264</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Versailles</span> Palace,
<a href="#page320">320</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Vézélay.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Abbey, <a href="#page166">166</a>,
<a href="#page198">198</a>,
<a href="#page203">203</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Vicenza</span>,
<a href="#page300">300</a>,
<a href="#page301">301</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Basilica, <a href="#page301">301</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
<span class="smallcaps">Palaces</span>:&mdash;
<a href="#page283">283</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Barbarano, Chieregati, Tiene, Valmarano,
<a href="#page301">301</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
Villa Capra, <a href="#page301">301</a>,
<a href="#page328">328</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Vienna</span>,
<a href="#page347">347</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Arsenal at Wiener Neustadt,
<a href="#page338">338</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Burgtheater, <a href="#page376">376</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cathedral (St. Stephen),
<a href="#page239">239</a>,
<a href="#page240">240</a>,
<a href="#page241">241</a>;</p>
<p class="inset2">
spire of, <a href="#page240">240</a>,
<a href="#page241">241</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church of St. Charles Borromeo,
<a href="#page358">358</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Imperial Palace, portal,
<a href="#page339">339</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Museums, <a href="#page378">378</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Opera House, <a href="#page376">376</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Parliament House, or Reichsrathsgebäude,
<a href="#page360">360</a>,
<a href="#page378">378</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Residence-block (Maria-Theresienhof),
<a href="#page378">378</a>
(<a href="#fig214"><b>214</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Sta. Maria in Gestade,
<a href="#page245">245</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, University,
<a href="#page378">378</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Votiv Kirche, <a href="#page375">375</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Vijayanagar.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace, <a href="#page413">413</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Vincennes.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Royal chapel, <a href="#page204">204</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Viterbo.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Houses, <a href="#page267">267</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall (Palazzo Communale),
<a href="#page266">266</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Villa Lante, <a href="#page293">293</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Volterra</span> (Volaterræ).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Gate, <a href="#page88">88</a></p>
<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_W" id="index_W" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Waltham</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Abbey, <a href="#page178">178</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Eleanor’s Cross, <a href="#page234">234</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Warfield.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. Michael’s, window
(<a href="#fig111"><b>111</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Warkah</span> (Erech).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Palace terraces, <a href="#page31">31</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Wartburg</span> Castle,
<a href="#page176">176</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Washington.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Capitol, <a href="#page389">389</a>,
<a href="#page391">391</a>
(<a href="#fig220"><b>220</b></a>).</p>
<p class="inset1">
Congressional Library,
<a href="#page399">399</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Patent Office, <a href="#page390">390</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
State, Army, and Navy Building,
<a href="#page392">392</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
White House, <a href="#page390">390</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Wells</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page222">222</a>,
<a href="#page225">225</a>,
<a href="#page232">232</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
west front, <a href="#page228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
chapter house of, <a href="#page223">223</a>
(<a href="#fig131"><b>131</b></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Westminster.</p>
<p class="inset1">
See <span class="smallcaps">London</span></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Westonzoyland.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Ceiling of St. Mary’s
(<a href="#fig138"><b>138</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Westover</span> House,
<a href="#page386">386</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Wiener-neustadt.</p>
<p class="inset1">
See <span class="smallcaps">Vienna</span></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Williamsburg.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Town hall, <a href="#page385">385</a></p>
<span class="pagenum">453</span>
<a name="page453" id="page453"> </a>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Wilton</span> House,
<a href="#page329">329</a></p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Winchester</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page178">178</a>,
<a href="#page220">220</a>,
<a href="#page222">222</a>,
<a href="#page226">226</a>,
<a href="#page229">229</a>
(<a href="#fig103"><b>103</b></a>);</p>
<p class="inset1">
tombs, etc., in, <a href="#page234">234</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Windsor.</p>
<p class="inset1">
St. George’s Chapel, <a href="#page223">223</a>,
<a href="#page227">227</a>,
<a href="#page234">234</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Wismar.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Castle (Fürstenhof), <a href="#page343">343</a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
City Gates, <a href="#page246">246</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Woburn.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Public Library (<a href="#fig223"><b>223</b></a>)</p>

<p><span class="smallcaps">Wollaton</span> Hall,
<a href="#page328">328</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Wolfenbüttel.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Marienkirche, <a href="#page345">345</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Wolterton</span> Castle,
<a href="#page326">326</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Worangul.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Kurti Stambha, <a href="#page410">410</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Worcester</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page232">232</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Worms.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Minster (cathedral), <a href="#page174">174</a>
(<a href="#fig99"><ins class="correction" title="text has ‘112’"><b>99</b></ins></a>)</p>

<p class="smallcaps">Würzburg.</p>
<p class="inset1">
University Church, <a href="#page345">345</a></p>
<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_X" id="index_X" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Xanten</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Church, <a href="#page242">242</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Xanthus.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Nereid monument, <a href="#page71">71</a></p>
<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_Y" id="index_Y" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">York</span></a> Cathedral,
<a href="#page192">192</a>,
<a href="#page225">225</a>,
<a href="#page226">226</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
west front, <a href="#page227">227</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
tower, <a href="#page228">228</a>;</p>
<p class="inset1">
minor works in, <a href="#page234">234</a></p>

<p class="smallcaps">Ypres.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Cloth hall, <a href="#page247">247</a></p>
<p class="first">
<a class="plain" name="index_Z" id="index_Z" href="#index">
<span class="smallcaps">Zurich</span></a>.</p>
<p class="inset1">
Polytechnic School, <a href="#page376">376</a></p>
<p><span class="smallcaps">Zwettl</span> Cathedral,
<a href="#page242">242</a></p>

</div> <!-- end div index -->

<div class="endnote">
<h4><a name="errors" id="errors">
Errors and Inconsistencies</a></h4>

<p>Missing or invisible punctuation has been silently supplied, as have
missing umlauts and line-end hyphens. Errors of this type were assumed
to be mechanical, introduced either in printing or scanning.</p>

<p>Hyphenization of some words was inconsistent: zigzag and zig-zag,
semicircular and semi-circular, staircase and stair-case. The plural of
“portico” is regularly “porticos”, rarely “porticoes”. Both occurrences
of “mantelpiece” are at line-break; the hyphen was omitted based on
usage in the 8th edition.</p>

<p>Alphabetization in the Index is as printed.</p>

<h5>Names</h5>

<div class="hanging">
<p>The architect Robert Adam is consistently called “Adams”; the error
was corrected in the 8th edition. The name form “Michael Angelo” is
standard for the time.</p>

<p>Columbia College changed its name to Columbia University in 1896,
presumably after the book’s original preface (dated January 20, 1896)
was
written.</p>

<p>The French palace is variously Luxembourg and Luxemburg.</p>
</div>

<h5>Place Names</h5>

<p>Spelling of place names was unchanged except when there was an
unambiguous error.</p>

<p>The form “Herculanum” (for Herculanum) was used consistently. The
English city is Peterboro’ (with apostrophe) in its first few
appearances, and then changes to Peterborough for the remainder of the
book. The Italian city was conventionally spelled “Sienna” (with
two n’s) in English.</p>

<p>Many names, especially non-European ones, differ significantly from
their modern form. Some of the following are conjectural.</p>

<table class="names" summary="place names">
<tr>
<td>Ipsamboul</td>
<td><p>Abu Simbel</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bozrah</td>
<td><p>probably modern Bouseira, Jordan (not “Bosrah”, modern
Basra)</p></td>
</tr>
<tr class="space">
<td>Tope</td>
<td><p>the form “stupa” is more common</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Indian desert</td>
<td><p>Thar desert</p></td>
</tr>
<tr class="space">
<td>Baillur</td>
<td><p>Belur</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chillambaram</td>
<td><p>probably Chidambaram; the author’s sources seem to have had
trouble with “l” in South Indian names</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Conjeveram</td>
<td><p>Kanchipuram</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><p>Futtehpore&nbsp;Sikhri</p></td>
<td><p>Fatehpur Sikri</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hullabid</td>
<td><p>Halebid</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jaunpore</td>
<td><p>Janpur</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jugganat</td>
<td><p>the name of the deity is Jagannath; the English name-form led to
the word “juggernaut”</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kantonnuggur</td>
<td><p>Kantanagar</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oudeypore</td>
<td><p>the author seems not to have realized that this is the same place
as Udaipur, cited with that spelling in the same paragraph</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Scinde</td>
<td><p>Sind</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Shepree or Sheepree</td>
<td><p>could not be identified. The author’s source is probably James
Ferguson, who describes it as “near Gualior” (Gwalior)</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tanjore</td>
<td><p>Thanjavur</p></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Worangul</td>
<td><p>Varangal</p></td>
</tr>
<tr class="space">
<td><p>Nakhon Wat</p></td>
<td><p>better known as Angkor Wat</p></td>
</tr>
</table>

</div>

<div style='display:block; margin-top:4em'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE ***</div>
<div style='text-align:left'>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
Updated editions will replace the previous one&#8212;the old editions will
be renamed.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S. copyright
law means that no one owns a United States copyright in these works,
so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United
States without permission and without paying copyright
royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of Use part
of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG&#8482;
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything for
copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is very
easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as creation
of derivative works, reports, performances and research. Project
Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given away&#8212;you may
do practically ANYTHING in the United States with eBooks not protected
by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject to the trademark
license, especially commercial redistribution.
</div>

<div style='margin-top:1em; font-size:1.1em; text-align:center'>START: FULL LICENSE</div>
<div style='text-align:center;font-size:0.9em'>THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE</div>
<div style='text-align:center;font-size:0.9em'>PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
To protect the Project Gutenberg&#8482; mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase &#8220;Project
Gutenberg&#8221;), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full
Project Gutenberg&#8482; License available with this file or online at
www.gutenberg.org/license.
</div>

<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg&#8482;
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or
destroy all copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works in your
possession. If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a
Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work and you do not agree to be bound
by the terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person
or entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.B. &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; is a registered trademark. It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See
paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works if you follow the terms of this
agreement and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg&#8482;
electronic works. See paragraph 1.E below.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation (&#8220;the
Foundation&#8221; or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection
of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works. Nearly all the individual
works in the collection are in the public domain in the United
States. If an individual work is unprotected by copyright law in the
United States and you are located in the United States, we do not
claim a right to prevent you from copying, distributing, performing,
displaying or creating derivative works based on the work as long as
all references to Project Gutenberg are removed. Of course, we hope
that you will support the Project Gutenberg&#8482; mission of promoting
free access to electronic works by freely sharing Project Gutenberg&#8482;
works in compliance with the terms of this agreement for keeping the
Project Gutenberg&#8482; name associated with the work. You can easily
comply with the terms of this agreement by keeping this work in the
same format with its attached full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License when
you share it without charge with others.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are
in a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States,
check the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this
agreement before downloading, copying, displaying, performing,
distributing or creating derivative works based on this work or any
other Project Gutenberg&#8482; work. The Foundation makes no
representations concerning the copyright status of any work in any
country other than the United States.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other
immediate access to, the full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License must appear
prominently whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg&#8482; work (any work
on which the phrase &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; appears, or with which the
phrase &#8220;Project Gutenberg&#8221; is associated) is accessed, displayed,
performed, viewed, copied or distributed:
</div>

<blockquote>
  <div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
    This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most
    other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions
    whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
    of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online
    at <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>. If you
    are not located in the United States, you will have to check the laws
    of the country where you are located before using this eBook.
  </div>
</blockquote>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work is
derived from texts not protected by U.S. copyright law (does not
contain a notice indicating that it is posted with permission of the
copyright holder), the work can be copied and distributed to anyone in
the United States without paying any fees or charges. If you are
redistributing or providing access to a work with the phrase &#8220;Project
Gutenberg&#8221; associated with or appearing on the work, you must comply
either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 or
obtain permission for the use of the work and the Project Gutenberg&#8482;
trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any
additional terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms
will be linked to the Project Gutenberg&#8482; License for all works
posted with the permission of the copyright holder found at the
beginning of this work.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg&#8482;
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg&#8482;.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg&#8482; License.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including
any word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access
to or distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg&#8482; work in a format
other than &#8220;Plain Vanilla ASCII&#8221; or other format used in the official
version posted on the official Project Gutenberg&#8482; website
(www.gutenberg.org), you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense
to the user, provide a copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means
of obtaining a copy upon request, of the work in its original &#8220;Plain
Vanilla ASCII&#8221; or other form. Any alternate format must include the
full Project Gutenberg&#8482; License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg&#8482; works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
provided that:
</div>

<div style='margin-left:0.7em;'>
    <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
        &#8226; You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
        the use of Project Gutenberg&#8482; works calculated using the method
        you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is owed
        to the owner of the Project Gutenberg&#8482; trademark, but he has
        agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments must be paid
        within 60 days following each date on which you prepare (or are
        legally required to prepare) your periodic tax returns. Royalty
        payments should be clearly marked as such and sent to the Project
        Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the address specified in
        Section 4, &#8220;Information about donations to the Project Gutenberg
        Literary Archive Foundation.&#8221;
    </div>

    <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
        &#8226; You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
        you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
        does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg&#8482;
        License. You must require such a user to return or destroy all
        copies of the works possessed in a physical medium and discontinue
        all use of and all access to other copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
        works.
    </div>

    <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
        &#8226; You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of
        any money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
        electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days of
        receipt of the work.
    </div>

    <div style='text-indent:-0.7em'>
        &#8226; You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
        distribution of Project Gutenberg&#8482; works.
    </div>
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project
Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work or group of works on different terms than
are set forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing
from the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the manager of
the Project Gutenberg&#8482; trademark. Contact the Foundation as set
forth in Section 3 below.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.F.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
works not protected by U.S. copyright law in creating the Project
Gutenberg&#8482; collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg&#8482;
electronic works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may
contain &#8220;Defects,&#8221; such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate
or corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or
other medium, a computer virus, or computer codes that damage or
cannot be read by your equipment.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the &#8220;Right
of Replacement or Refund&#8221; described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg&#8482; trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg&#8482; electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium
with your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you
with the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in
lieu of a refund. If you received the work electronically, the person
or entity providing it to you may choose to give you a second
opportunity to receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If
the second copy is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing
without further opportunities to fix the problem.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you &#8216;AS-IS&#8217;, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of
damages. If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement
violates the law of the state applicable to this agreement, the
agreement shall be interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or
limitation permitted by the applicable state law. The invalidity or
unenforceability of any provision of this agreement shall not void the
remaining provisions.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works in
accordance with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the
production, promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
electronic works, harmless from all liability, costs and expenses,
including legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of
the following which you do or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this
or any Project Gutenberg&#8482; work, (b) alteration, modification, or
additions or deletions to any Project Gutenberg&#8482; work, and (c) any
Defect you cause.
</div>

<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg&#8482;
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
Project Gutenberg&#8482; is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of
computers including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It
exists because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations
from people in all walks of life.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg&#8482;&#8217;s
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg&#8482; collection will
remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg&#8482; and future
generations. To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation and how your efforts and donations can help, see
Sections 3 and 4 and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org.
</div>

<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non-profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service. The Foundation&#8217;s EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent permitted by
U.S. federal laws and your state&#8217;s laws.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
The Foundation&#8217;s business office is located at 809 North 1500 West,
Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email contact links and up
to date contact information can be found at the Foundation&#8217;s website
and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact.
</div>

<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
Project Gutenberg&#8482; depends upon and cannot survive without widespread
public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine-readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To SEND
DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any particular state
visit <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org/donate/">www.gutenberg.org/donate</a>.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. To
donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
</div>

<div style='display:block; font-size:1.1em; margin:1em 0; font-weight:bold'>
Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg&#8482; electronic works
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project
Gutenberg&#8482; concept of a library of electronic works that could be
freely shared with anyone. For forty years, he produced and
distributed Project Gutenberg&#8482; eBooks with only a loose network of
volunteer support.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
Project Gutenberg&#8482; eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as not protected by copyright in
the U.S. unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not
necessarily keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper
edition.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: <a href="https://www.gutenberg.org">www.gutenberg.org</a>.
</div>

<div style='display:block; margin:1em 0'>
This website includes information about Project Gutenberg&#8482;,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.
</div>

</div>

</body>
</html>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2026-06-21 07:00:50 +0000