diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:33:56 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:33:56 -0700 |
| commit | 6ca49d4a2e8e7473c50c8a78b6aa8434005caa16 (patch) | |
| tree | 632edd065f396fe9669c4aae117a4fad24554249 /9887-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '9887-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 9887-h/9887-h.htm | 6817 |
1 files changed, 6817 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/9887-h/9887-h.htm b/9887-h/9887-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..df0b279 --- /dev/null +++ b/9887-h/9887-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,6817 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> + +<!DOCTYPE html + PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd" > + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> + <head> + <meta content="pg2html (binary v0.17)" name="linkgenerator" /> + <title> + Essays in War-time, by Havelock Ellis + </title> + <style type="text/css" xml:space="preserve"> + body { margin:5%; background:#faebd0; text-align:justify} + P { text-indent: 1em; margin-top: .75em; margin-bottom: .75em; } + H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { text-align: center; margin-left: 15%; margin-right: 15%; } + hr { width: 50%; text-align: center;} + .foot { margin-left: 5%; margin-right: 5%; text-align: justify; font-size: 80%; font-style: italic;} + blockquote {font-size: 97%; font-style: italic; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;} + .mynote {background-color: #DDE; color: #000; padding: .5em; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 95%;} + .toc { margin-left: 10%; margin-bottom: .75em;} + .toc2 { margin-left: 20%;} + .xx-small {font-size: 60%;} + .x-small {font-size: 75%;} + .small {font-size: 85%;} + .large {font-size: 115%;} + .x-large {font-size: 130%;} + .indent5 { margin-left: 5%;} + .indent10 { margin-left: 10%;} + .indent15 { margin-left: 15%;} + .indent20 { margin-left: 20%;} + .indent25 { margin-left: 25%;} + .indent30 { margin-left: 30%;} + .indent35 { margin-left: 35%;} + .indent40 { margin-left: 40%;} + div.fig { display:block; margin:0 auto; text-align:center; } + div.middle { margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 20%; text-align: justify; } + .figleft {float: left; margin-left: 0%; margin-right: 1%;} + .figright {float: right; margin-right: 0%; margin-left: 1%;} + .pagenum {position: absolute; right: 1%; font-size: 0.6em; + font-variant: normal; font-style: normal; + text-align: right; background-color: #FFFACD; + border: 1px solid; padding: 0.3em;text-indent: 0em;} + .side { float: left; font-size: 75%; width: 15%; padding-left: 0.8em; + border-left: dashed thin; text-align: left; + text-indent: 0; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; + font-weight: bold; color: black; background: #eeeeee; border: solid 1px;} + .head { float: left; font-size: 90%; width: 98%; padding-left: 0.8em; + border-left: dashed thin; text-align: center; + text-indent: 0; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; + font-weight: bold; color: black; background: #eeeeee; border: solid 1px;} + p.pfirst, p.noindent {text-indent: 0} + span.dropcap { float: left; margin: 0 0.1em 0 0; line-height: 0.8 } + pre { font-style: italic; font-size: 90%; margin-left: 10%;} +</style> + </head> + <body> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> +The Project Gutenberg EBook of Essays in War-Time, by Havelock Ellis + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: Essays in War-Time + Further Studies In The Task Of Social Hygiene + +Author: Havelock Ellis + + +Release Date: February, 2006 [EBook #9887] +First Posted: October 28, 2003 +Last Updated: April 22, 2019 + + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ESSAYS IN WAR-TIME *** + + + +Etext produced by Eric Eldred, Beth Trapaga and PG Distributed Proofreaders + +HTML file produced by David Widger + + + + +</pre> + <div style="height: 8em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h1> + ESSAYS IN WAR-TIME + </h1> + <h3> + Further Studies In The Task Of Social Hygiene + </h3> + <h2> + By Havelock Ellis + </h2> + <p> + <br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <br /> + </p> + <p> + <b>CONTENTS</b> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0001"> I — INTRODUCTION </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0002"> II — EVOLUTION AND WAR </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0003"> III — WAR AND EUGENICS </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0004"> IV — MORALITY IN WARFARE </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0005"> V — IS WAR DIMINISHING? </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0006"> VI — WAR AND THE BIRTH-RATE </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0007"> VII — WAR AND DEMOCRACY </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0008"> VIII — FEMINISM AND MASCULINISM </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0009"> IX — THE MENTAL DIFFERENCES OF MEN AND + WOMEN </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0010"> X — THE WHITE SLAVE CRUSADE </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0011"> XI — THE CONQUEST OF VENEREAL DISEASE </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0012"> XII — THE NATIONALISATION OF HEALTH </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0013"> XIII — EUGENICS AND GENIUS </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0014"> XIV — THE PRODUCTION OF ABILITY </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0015"> XV — MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0016"> XVI — THE MEANING OF THE BIRTH-RATE </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0017"> XVII — CIVILISATION AND THE BIRTH-RATE + </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0018"> XVIII — BIRTH CONTROL </a> + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0001" id="link2H_4_0001"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + I — INTRODUCTION + </h2> + <p> + From the point of view of literature, the Great War of to-day has brought + us into a new and closer sympathy with the England of the past. Dr. Woods + and Mr. Baltzly in their recent careful study of European Warfare, <i>Is + War Diminishing?</i> come to the conclusion that England during the period + of her great activity in the world has been "fighting about half the + time." We had begun to look on war as belonging to the past and insensibly + fallen into the view of Buckle that in England "a love of war is, as a + national taste, utterly extinct." Now we have awakened to realise that we + belong to a people who have been "fighting about half the time." + </p> + <p> + Thus it is, for instance, that we witness a revival of interest in + Wordsworth, not that Wordsworth, the high-priest of Nature among the + solitary Lakes, whom we have never forsaken, but the Wordsworth who sang + exultantly of Carnage as God's Daughter. To-day we turn to the war-like + Wordsworth, the stern patriot hurling defiance at the enemies who + threatened our island fortress, as the authentic voice of England. + </p> + <p> + But this new sense of community with the past comes to us again and again + on every hand when to-day we look back to the records of the past. I + chance to take down the <i>Epistles</i> of Erasmus, and turn to the + letters which the great Humanist of Rotterdam wrote from Cambridge and + London four hundred years ago when young Henry VIII had just suddenly (in + 1514) plunged into war. One reads them to-day with vivid interest, for + here in the supple and sensitive brain of the old scholar we see mirrored + precisely the same thoughts and the same problems which exercise the more + scholarly brains of to-day. Erasmus, as his Pan-German friends liked to + remind him, was a sort of German, but he was, nevertheless, what we should + now call a Pacifist. He can see nothing good in war and he eloquently sets + forth what he regards as its evils. It is interesting to observe, how, + even in its small details as well as in its great calamities, war brought + precisely the same experiences four centuries ago as to-day. Prices are + rising every day, Erasmus declares, taxation has become so heavy that no + one can afford to be liberal, imports are hampered and wine is scarce, it + is difficult even to get one's foreign letters. In fact the preparations + of war are rapidly changing "the genius of the Island." Thereupon Erasmus + launches into more general considerations on war. Even animals, he points + out, do not fight, save rarely, and then with only those of other species, + and, moreover, not, like us, "with machines upon which we expend the + ingenuity of devils." In every war also it is the non-combatants who + suffer most, the people build cities and the folly of their rulers + destroys them, the most righteous, the most victorious war brings more + evil than good, and even when a real issue is in dispute, it could better + have been settled by arbitration. The moral contagion of a war, moreover, + lasts long after the war is over, and Erasmus proceeds to express himself + freely on the crimes of fighters and fighting. + </p> + <p> + Erasmus was a cosmopolitan scholar who habitually dwelt in the world of + the spirit and in no wise expressed the general feelings either of his own + time or ours. It is interesting to turn to a very ordinary, it may be + typical, Englishman who lived a century later, again in a period of war + and also of quite ordinary and but moderately glorious war. John Rous, a + Cambridge graduate of old Suffolk family, was in 1623 appointed incumbent + of Santon Downham, then called a town, though now it has dwindled away + almost to nothing. Here, or rather at Weeting or at Brandon where he + lived, Rous began two years later, on the accession of Charles I, a + private diary which was printed by the Camden Society sixty years ago, and + has probably remained unread ever since, unless, as in the present case, + by some person of antiquarian tastes interested in this remote corner of + East Anglia. But to-day one detects a new streak of interest in this + ancient series of miscellaneous entries where we find that war brought to + the front the very same problems which confront us to-day. + </p> + <p> + Santon Downham lies in a remote and desolate and salubrious region, not + without its attractions to-day, nor, for all its isolation, devoid of + ancient and modern associations. For here in Weeting parish we have the + great prehistoric centre of the flint implement industry, still lingering + on at Brandon after untold ages, a shrine of the archaeologist. And here + also, or at all events near by, at Lackenheath, doubtless a shrine also + for all men in khaki, the villager proudly points out the unpretentious + little house which is the ancestral home of the Kitcheners, who lie in + orderly rank in the churchyard beside the old church notable for its + rarely quaint mediaeval carvings. + </p> + <p> + Rous was an ordinary respectable type of country parson, a solid + Englishman, cautious and temperate in his opinions, even in the privacy of + his diary, something of a country gentleman as well as a scholar, and + interested in everything that went on, in the season's crops, in the + rising price of produce, in the execution of a youth for burglary or the + burning of a woman for murdering her husband. He frequently refers to the + outbreak of plague in various parts of the country, and notes, for + instance, that "Cambridge is wondrously reformed since the plague there; + scholars frequent not the streets and taverns as before; but," he adds + later on better information, "do worse." And at the same time he is full + of interest in the small incidents of Nature around him, and notes, for + instance, how a crow had built a nest and laid an egg in the poke of the + topsail of the windmill. + </p> + <p> + But Rous's Diary is not concerned only with matters of local interest. All + the rumours of the world reached the Vicar of Downham and were by him + faithfully set down from day to day. Europe was seething with war; these + were the days of that famous Thirty Years' War of which we have so often + heard of late, and from time to time England was joining in the general + disturbance, whether in France, Spain, or the Netherlands. As usual the + English attack was mostly from the basis of the Fleet, and never before, + Rous notes, had England possessed so great and powerful a fleet. Soon + after the Diary begins the English Expedition to Rochelle took place, and + a version of its history is here embodied. Rous was kept in touch with the + outside world not only by the proclamations constantly set up at Thetford + on the corner post of the Bell Inn—still the centre of that ancient + town—but by as numerous and as varied a crop of reports as we find + floating among us to-day, often indeed of very similar character. The + vicar sets them down, not committing himself to belief but with a patient + confidence that "time may tell us what we may safely think." In the + meanwhile measures with which we are familiar to-day were actively in + progress: recruits or "voluntaries" were being "gathered up by the drum," + many soldiers, mostly Irish, were billeted, sometimes not without + friction, all over East Anglia, the coasts were being fortified, the price + of corn was rising, and even the problem of international exchange is + discussed with precise data by Rous. + </p> + <p> + On one occasion, in 1627, Rous reports a discussion concerning the + Rochelle Expedition which exactly counterparts our experience to-day. He + was at Brandon with two gentlemen named Paine and Howlet, when the former + began to criticise the management of the expedition, disputing the + possibility of its success and then "fell in general to speak + distrustfully of the voyage, and then of our war with France, which he + would make our King the cause of"; and so went on to topics of old popular + discontent, of the great cost, the hazard to ships, etc. Rous, like a good + patriot, thought it "foul for any man to lay the blame upon our own King + and State. I told them I would always speak the best of what our King and + State did, and think the best too, till I had good grounds." And then in + his Diary he comments that he saw hereby, what he had often seen before, + that men be disposed to speak the worst of State business, as though it + were always being mismanaged, and so nourish a discontent which is itself + a worse mischief and can only give joy to false hearts. That is a + reflection which comes home to us to-day when we find the descendants of + Mr. Paine following so vigorously the example which the parson of Downham + reprobated. + </p> + <p> + That little incident at Brandon, however, and indeed the whole picture of + the ordinary English life of his time which Rous sets forth, suggest a + wider reflection. We realise what has always been the English temper. It + is the temper of a vigorous, independent, opinionated, free-spoken yet + sometimes suspicious people among whom every individual feels in himself + the impulse to rule. It is also the temper of a people always prepared in + the face of danger to subordinate these native impulses. The one tendency + and the other opposing tendency are alike based on the history and + traditions of the race. Fifteen centuries ago, Sidonius Apollinaris gazed + inquisitively at the Saxon barbarians, most ferocious of all foes, who + came to Aquitania, with faces daubed with blue paint and hair pushed back + over their foreheads; shy and awkward among the courtiers, free and + turbulent when back again in their ships, they were all teaching and + learning at once, and counted even shipwreck as good training. One would + think, the Bishop remarks, that each oarsman was himself the + arch-pirate.[1] These were the men who so largely went to the making of + the "Anglo-Saxon," and Sidonius might doubtless still utter the same + comment could he observe their descendants in England to-day. Every + Englishman believes in his heart, however modestly he may conceal the + conviction, that he could himself organise as large an army as Kitchener + and organise it better. But there is not only the instinct to order and to + teach but also to learn and to obey. For every Englishman is the + descendant of sailors, and even this island of Britain seemed to men of + old like a great ship anchored in the sea. Nothing can overcome the + impulse of the sailor to stand by his post at the moment of danger, and to + play his sailorly part, whatever his individual convictions may be + concerning the expedition to Rochelle or the expedition to the + Dardanelles, or even concerning his right to play no part at all. That has + ever been the Englishman's impulse in the hour of peril of his island Ship + of State, as to-day we see illustrated in an almost miraculous degree. It + is the saving grace of an obstinately independent and indisciplinable + people. + </p> + <p> + Yet let us not forget that this same English temper is shown not only in + warfare, not only in adventure in the physical world, but also in the + greater, and—may we not say?—equally arduous tasks of peace. + For to build up is even yet more difficult than to pull down, to create + new life a still more difficult and complex task than to destroy it. Our + English habits of restless adventure, of latent revolt subdued to the ends + of law and order, of uncontrollable freedom and independence, are even + more fruitful here, in the organisation of the progressive tasks of life, + than they are in the organisation of the tasks of war. + </p> + <p> + That is the spirit in which these essays have been written by an + Englishman of English stock in the narrowest sense, whose national and + family instincts of independence and warfare have been transmuted into a + preoccupation with the more constructive tasks of life. It is a spirit + which may give to these little essays—mostly produced while war was + in progress—a certain unity which was not designed when I wrote + them. + </p> + <p> + [1] O'Dalton, <i>Letters of Sidonius</i>, Vol. II., p. 149. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0002" id="link2H_4_0002"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + II — EVOLUTION AND WAR + </h2> + <p> + The Great War of to-day has rendered acute the question of the place of + warfare in Nature and the effect of war on the human race. These have long + been debated problems concerning which there is no complete agreement. But + until we make up our minds on these fundamental questions we can gain no + solid ground from which to face serenely, or at all events firmly, the + crisis through which mankind is now passing. + </p> + <p> + It has been widely held that war has played an essential part in the + evolutionary struggle for survival among our animal ancestors, that war + has been a factor of the first importance in the social development of + primitive human races, and that war always will be an essential method of + preserving the human virtues even in the highest civilisation. It must be + observed that these are three separate and quite distinct propositions. It + is possible to accept one, or even two, of them without affirming them + all. If we wish to clear our minds of confusion on this matter, so vital + to our civilisation, we must face each of the questions by itself. + </p> + <p> + It has sometimes been maintained—never more energetically than + to-day, especially among the nations which most eagerly entered the + present conflict—that war is a biological necessity. War, we are + told, is a manifestation of the "Struggle for Life"; it is the inevitable + application to mankind of the Darwinian "law" of natural selection. There + are, however, two capital and final objections to this view. On the one + hand it is not supported by anything that Darwin himself said, and on the + other hand it is denied as a fact by those authorities on natural history + who speak with most knowledge. That Darwin regarded war as an + insignificant or even non-existent part of natural selection must be clear + to all who have read his books. He was careful to state that he used the + term "struggle for existence" in a "metaphorical sense," and the dominant + factors in the struggle for existence, as Darwin understood it, were + natural suitability to the organic and inorganic environment and the + capacity for adaptation to circumstances; one species flourishes while a + less efficient species living alongside it languishes, yet they may never + come in actual contact and there is nothing in the least approaching human + warfare. The conditions much more resemble what, among ourselves, we may + see in business, where the better equipped species, that is to say, the + big capitalist, flourishes, while the less well equipped species, the + small capitalist, succumbs. Mr. Chalmers Mitchell, Secretary of the London + Zoological Society and familiar with the habits of animals, has lately + emphasised the contention of Darwin and shown that even the most widely + current notions of the extermination of one species by another have no + foundation in fact.[1] Thus the thylacine or Tasmanian wolf, the fiercest + of the marsupials, has been entirely driven out of Australia and its place + taken by a later and higher animal, of the dog family, the dingo. But + there is not the slightest reason to believe that the dingo ever made war + on the thylacine. If there was any struggle at all it was a common + struggle against the environment, in which the dingo, by superior + intelligence in finding food and rearing young, and by greater resisting + power to climate and disease, was able to succeed where the thylacine + failed. Again, the supposed war of extermination waged in Europe by the + brown rat against the black rat is (as Chalmers Mitchell points out) pure + fiction. In England, where this war is said to have been ferociously + waged, both rats exist and flourish, and under conditions which do not + usually even bring them into competition with each other. The black rat (<i>Mus + rattus</i>) is smaller than the other, but more active and a better + climber; he is the rat of the barn and the granary. The brown or Norway + rat (<i>Mus decumanus</i>) is larger but less active, a burrower rather + than a climber, and though both rats are omnivorous the brown rat is more + especially a scavenger; he is the rat of sewers and drains. The black rat + came to Northern Europe first—both of them probably being Asiatic + animals—and has no doubt been to some extent replaced by the brown + rat, who has been specially favoured by the modern extension of drains and + sewers, which exactly suit his peculiar tastes. But each flourishes in his + own environment; neither of them is adapted to the other's environment; + there is no war between them, nor any occasion for war, for they do not + really come into competition with each other. The cockroaches, or + "blackbeetles," furnish another example. These pests are comparatively + modern and their great migrations in recent times are largely due to the + activity of human commerce. There are three main species of cockroach—the + Oriental, the American, and the German (or Croton bug)—and they + flourish near together in many countries, though not with equal success, + for while in England the Oriental is most prosperous, in America the + German cockroach is most abundant. They are seldom found in actual + association, each is best adapted to a particular environment; there is no + reason to suppose that they fight. It is so throughout Nature. Animals may + utilise other species as food; but that is true of even, the most + peaceable and civilised human races. The struggle for existence means that + one species is more favoured by circumstances than another species; there + is not the remotest resemblance anywhere to human warfare. + </p> + <p> + We may pass on to the second claim for war: that it is an essential factor + in the social development of primitive human races. War has no part, + though competition has a very large part, in what we call "Nature." But, + when we come to primitive man the conditions are somewhat changed; men, + unlike the lower animals, are able to form large communities—"tribes," + as we call them—with common interests, and two primitive tribes can + come into a competition which is acute to the point of warfare because + being of the same, and not of two different, species, the conditions of + life which they both demand are identical; they are impelled to fight for + the possession of these conditions as animals of different species are not + impelled to fight. We are often told that animals are more "moral" than + human beings, and it is largely to the fact that, except under the + immediate stress of hunger, they are better able to live in peace with + each other, that the greater morality of animals is due. Yet, we have to + recognise, this mischievous tendency to warfare, so often (though by no + means always, and in the earliest stages probably never) found in + primitive man, was bound up with his superior and progressive qualities. + His intelligence, his quickness of sense, his muscular skill, his courage + and endurance, his aptitude for discipline and for organisation—all + of them qualities on which civilisation is based—were fostered by + warfare. With warfare in primitive life was closely associated the still + more fundamental art, older than humanity, of dancing. The dance was the + training school for all the activities which man developed in a supreme + degree—for love, for religion, for art, for organised labour—and + in primitive days dancing was the chief military school, a perpetual + exercise in mimic warfare during times of peace, and in times of war the + most powerful stimulus to military prowess by the excitement it aroused. + Not only was war a formative and developmental social force of the first + importance among early men, but it was comparatively free from the + disadvantages which warfare later on developed; the hardness of their life + and the obtuseness of their sensibility reduced to a minimum the bad + results of wounds and shocks, while their warfare, being free from the + awful devices due to the devilry of modern man, was comparatively + innocuous; even if very destructive, its destruction was necessarily + limited by the fact that those accumulated treasures of the past which + largely make civilisation had not come into existence. We may admire the + beautiful humanity, the finely developed social organisation, and the + skill in the arts attained by such people as the Eskimo tribes, which know + nothing of war, but we must also recognise that warfare among primitive + peoples has often been a progressive and developmental force of the first + importance, creating virtues apt for use in quite other than military + spheres.[2] + </p> + <p> + The case is altered when we turn from savagery to civilisation. The new + and more complex social order while, on the one hand, it presents + substitutes for war in so far as war is a source of virtues, on the other + hand, renders war a much more dangerous performance both to the individual + and to the community, becoming indeed, progressively more dangerous to + both, until it reaches such a climax of world-wide injury as we witness + to-day. The claim made in primitive societies that warfare is necessary to + the maintenance of virility and courage, a claim so fully admitted that + only the youth furnished with trophies of heads or scalps can hope to + become an accepted lover, is out of date in civilisation. For under + civilised conditions there are hundreds of avocations which furnish + exactly the same conditions as warfare for the cultivation of all the + manly virtues of enterprise and courage and endurance, physical or moral. + Not only are these new avocations equally potent for the cultivation of + virility, but far more useful for the social ends of civilisation. For + these ends warfare is altogether less adapted than it is for the social + ends of savagery. It is much less congenial to the tastes and aptitudes of + the individual, while at the same time it is incomparably more injurious + to Society. In savagery little is risked by war, for the precious + heirlooms of humanity have not yet been created, and war can destroy + nothing which cannot easily be remade by the people who first made it. But + civilisation possesses—and in that possession, indeed, civilisation + largely consists—the precious traditions of past ages that can never + live again, embodied in part in exquisite productions of varied beauty + which are a continual joy and inspiration to mankind, and in part in + slowly evolved habits and laws of social amenity, and reasonable freedom, + and mutual independence, which under civilised conditions war, whether + between nations or between classes, tends to destroy, and in so destroying + to inflict a permanent loss in the material heirlooms of Mankind and a + serious injury to the spiritual traditions of civilisation. + </p> + <p> + It is possible to go further and to declare that warfare is in + contradiction with the whole of the influences which build up and organise + civilisation. A tribe is a small but very closely knit unity, so closely + knit that the individual is entirely subordinated to the whole and has + little independence of action or even of thought. The tendency of + civilisation is to create webs of social organisation which grow ever + larger, but at the same time looser, so that the individual gains a + continually growing freedom and independence. The tribe becomes merged in + the nation, and beyond even this great unit, bonds of international + relationship are progressively formed. War, which at first favoured this + movement, becomes an ever greater impediment to its ultimate progress. + This is recognised at the threshold of civilisation, and the large + community, or nation, abolishes warfare between the units of which it is + composed by the device of establishing law courts to dispense impartial + justice. As soon as civilised society realised that it was necessary to + forbid two persons to settle their disputes by individual fighting, or by + initiating blood-feuds, or by arming friends and followers, setting up + courts of justice for the peaceable settlement of disputes, the death-blow + of all war was struck. For all the arguments that proved strong enough to + condemn war between two individuals are infinitely stronger to condemn war + between the populations of two-thirds of the earth. But, while it was a + comparatively easy task for a State to abolish war and impose peace within + its own boundaries—and nearly all over Europe the process was begun + and for the most part ended centuries ago—it is a vastly more + difficult task to abolish war and impose peace between powerful States. + Yet at the point at which we stand to-day civilisation can make no further + progress until this is done. Solitary thinkers, like the Abbé de + Saint-Pierre, and even great practical statesmen like Sully and Penn, have + from time to time realised this fact during the past four centuries, and + attempted to convert it into actuality. But it cannot be done until the + great democracies are won over to a conviction of its inevitable + necessity. We need an international organisation of law courts which shall + dispense justice as between nation and nation in the same way as the + existing law courts of all civilised countries now dispense justice as + between man and man; and we further need, behind this international + organisation of justice, an international organisation of police strong + enough to carry out the decisions of these courts, not to exercise tyranny + but to ensure to every nation, even the smallest, that measure of + reasonable freedom and security to go about its own business which every + civilised nation now, in some small degree at all events, already ensures + to the humblest of its individual citizens. The task may take centuries to + complete, but there is no more urgent task before mankind to-day.[3] + </p> + <p> + These considerations are very elementary, and a year or two ago they might + have seemed to many—though not to all of us—merely academic, + chiefly suitable to put before schoolchildren. But now they have ceased to + be merely academic; they have indeed acquired a vital actuality almost + agonisingly intense. For one realises to-day that the considerations here + set forth, widely accepted as they are, yet are not generally accepted by + the rulers and leaders of the greatest and foremost nations of the world. + Thus Germany, in its present Prussianised state, through the mouths as + well as through the actions of those rulers and leaders, denies most of + the conclusions here set forth. In Germany it is a commonplace to declare + that war is the law of Nature, that the "struggle for existence" means the + arbitration of warfare, that it is by war that all evolution proceeds, + that not only in savagery but in the highest civilisation the same rule + holds good, that human war is the source of all virtues, the divinely + inspired method of regenerating and purifying mankind, and every war may + properly be regarded as a holy war. These beliefs have been implicit in + the Prussian spirit ever since the Goths and Vandals issued from the + forests of the Vistula in the dawn of European history. But they have now + become a sort of religious dogma, preached from pulpits, taught in + Universities, acted out by statesmen. From this Prussian point of view, + whether right or wrong, civilisation, as it has hitherto been understood + in the world, is of little consequence compared to German militaristic + Kultur. Therefore the German quite logically regards the Russians as + barbarians, and the French as decadents, and the English as contemptibly + negligible, although the Russians, however yet dominated by a military + bureaucracy (moulded by Teutonic influences, as some maliciously point + out), are the most humane people of Europe, and the French the natural + leaders of civilisation as commonly understood, and the English, however + much they may rely on amateurish methods of organisation by emergency, + have scattered the seeds of progress over a large part of the earth's + surface. It is equally logical that the Germans should feel peculiar + admiration and sympathy for the Turks, and find in Turkey, a State founded + on military ideals, their own ally in the present war. That war, from our + present point of view, is a war of States which use military methods for + special ends (often indeed ends that have been thoroughly evil) against a + State which still cherishes the primitive ideal of warfare as an end in + itself. And while such a State must enjoy immense advantages in the + struggle, it is difficult, when we survey the whole course of human + development, to believe that there can be any doubt about the final issue. + </p> + <p> + For one who writes as an Englishman, it may be necessary to point out + clearly that that final issue by no means involves the destruction, or + even the subjugation, of Germany. It is indeed an almost pathetic fact + that Germany, which idealises warfare, stands to gain more than any + country by an assured rule of international peace which would save her + from warfare. Placed in a position which renders militaristic organisation + indispensable, the Germans are more highly endowed than almost any people + with the high qualities of intelligence, of receptiveness, of + adaptability, of thoroughness, of capacity for organisation, which ensure + success in the arts and sciences of peace, in the whole work of + civilisation. This is amply demonstrated by the immense progress and the + manifold achievements of Germany during forty years of peace, which have + enabled her to establish a prosperity and a good name in the world which + are now both in peril. Germany must be built up again, and the interests + of civilisation itself, which Germany has trampled under foot, demand that + Germany shall be built up again, under conditions, let us hope, which will + render her old ideals useless and out of date. We shall then be able to + assert as the mere truisms they are, and not as a defiance flung in the + face of one of the world's greatest nations, the elementary propositions I + have here set forth. War is not a permanent factor of national evolution, + but for the most part has no place in Nature at all; it has played a part + in the early development of primitive human society, but, as savagery + passes into civilisation, its beneficial effects are lost, and, on the + highest stages of human progress, mankind once more tends to be enfolded, + this time consciously and deliberately, in the general harmony of Nature. + </p> + <p> + [1] P. Chalmers Mitchell, <i>Evolution and the War</i>, 1915. + </p> + <p> + [2] On the advantages of war in primitive society, see W. MacDougal's <i>Social + Psychology</i>, Ch. XI. + </p> + <p> + [3] It is doubtless a task beset by difficulties, some of which are set + forth, in no hostile spirit, by Lord Cromer, "Thinking Internationally," + <i>Nineteenth Century</i>, July, 1916; but the statement of most of these + difficulties is enough to suggest the solution. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0003" id="link2H_4_0003"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + III — WAR AND EUGENICS + </h2> + <p> + In dealing with war it is not enough to discuss the place of warfare in + Nature or its effects on primitive peoples. Even if we decide that the + general tendency of civilisation is unfavourable to war we have scarcely + settled matters. It is necessary to push the question further home. + Primitive warfare among savages, when it fails to kill, may be a + stimulating and invigorating exercise, simply a more dangerous form of + dancing. But civilised warfare is a different kind of thing, to a very + limited extent depending on, or encouraging, the prowess of the individual + fighting men, and to be judged by other standards. <i>What precisely is + the measurable effect of war, if any, on the civilised human breed?</i> If + we want to know what to do about war in the future, that is the question + we have to answer. + </p> + <p> + "Wars are not paid for in war-time," said Benjamin Franklin, "the bill + comes later." Franklin, who was a pioneer in many so fields, seems to have + been a pioneer in eugenics also by arguing that a standing army diminishes + the size and breed of the human species. He had, however, no definite + facts wherewith to demonstrate conclusively that proposition. Even to-day, + it cannot be said that there is complete agreement among biologists as to + the effect of war on the race. Thus we find a distinguished American + zoologist, Chancellor Starr Jordan, constantly proclaiming that the effect + of war in reversing selection is a great overshadowing truth of history; + warlike nations, he declares, become effeminate, while peaceful nations + generate a fiercely militant spirit.[1] Another distinguished American + scientist, Professor Ripley, in his great work, <i>The Races of Europe</i>, + likewise concludes that "standing armies tend to overload succeeding + generations with inferior types of men." A cautious English biologist, + Professor J. Arthur Thomson, is equally decided in this opinion, and in + his recent Galton Lecture[2] sets forth the view that the influence of war + on the race, both directly and indirectly, is injurious; he admits that + there may be beneficial as well as deteriorative influences, but the + former merely affect the moral atmosphere, not the hereditary germ plasm; + biologically, war means wastage and a reversal of rational selection, + since it prunes off a disproportionally large number of those whom the + race can least afford to lose. On the other hand, another biologist, Dr. + Chalmers Mitchell, equally opposed to war, cannot feel certain that the + total effect of even a great modern war is to deteriorate the stock, while + in Germany, as we know, it is the generally current opinion, scientific + and unscientific, equally among philosophers, militarists, and + journalists, that not only is war "a biological necessity," but that it is + peace, and not war, which effeminates and degenerates a nation. In + Germany, indeed, this doctrine is so generally accepted that it is not + regarded as a scientific thesis to be proved, but as a religious dogma to + be preached. It is evident that we cannot decide this question, so vital + to human progress, except on a foundation of cold and hard fact. + </p> + <p> + Whatever may be the result of war on the quality of the breed, there can + be little doubt of its temporary effect on the quantity. The reaction + after war may create a stimulating influence on the birth-rate, leading to + a more or less satisfactory recovery, but it seems clear that the drafting + away of a large proportion of the manhood of a nation necessarily + diminishes births. At the present time English Schools are sending out an + unusually small number of pupils into life, and this is directly due to + the South-African War fifteen years ago. Still more obvious is the direct + effect of war, apart from diminishing the number of births, in actually + pouring out the blood of the young manhood of the race. In the very + earliest stage of primitive humanity it seems probable that man was as + untouched by warfare as his animal ancestors, and it is satisfactory to + think that war had no part in the first birth of man into the world. Even + the long Early Stone Age has left no distinguishable sign of the existence + of warfare.[3] It was not until the transition to the Late Stone Age, the + age of polished flint implements, that we discern evidences of the + homicidal attacks of man on man. Even then we are concerned more with + quarrels than with battles, for one of the earliest cases of wounding + known in human records, is that of a pregnant young woman found in the + Cro-magnon Cave whose skull had been cut open by a flint several weeks + before death, an indication that she had been cared for and nursed. But, + again at the beginning of the New Stone Age, in the caverns of the + Beaumes-Chaudes people, who still used implements of the Old Stone type, + we find skulls in which are weapons of the New Stone type. Evidently these + people had come in contact with a more "civilised" race which had + discovered war. Yet the old pacific race still lingered on, as in the + Belgian people of the Furfooz type who occupied themselves mainly with + hunting and fishing, and have their modern representatives, if not their + actual descendants, in the peaceful Lapps and Eskimo.[4] + </p> + <p> + It was thus at a late stage of human history, though still so primitive as + to be prehistoric, that organised warfare developed. At the dawn of + history war abounded. The earliest literature of the Aryans—whether + Greeks, Germans, or Hindus—is nothing but a record of systematic + massacres, and the early history of the Hebrews, leaders in the world's + religion and morality, is complacently bloodthirsty. Lapouge considers + that in modern times, though wars are fewer in number, the total number of + victims is still about the same, so that the stream of bloodshed + throughout the ages remains unaffected. He attempted to estimate the + victims of war for each civilised country during half a century, and found + that the total amounted to nine and a half millions, while, by including + the Napoleonic and other wars of the beginning of the nineteenth century, + he considered that that total would be doubled. Put in another form, + Lapouge says, the wars of a century spill 120,000,000 gallons of blood, + enough to fill three million forty-gallon casks, or to create a perpetual + fountain sending up a jet of 150 gallons per hour, a fountain which has + been flowing unceasingly ever since the dawn of history. It is to be + noted, also, that those slain on the battlefield by no means represent the + total victims of a war, but only about half of them; more than half of + those who, from one cause or another, perished in the Franco-Prussian war, + it is said, were not belligerents. Lapouge wrote some ten years ago and + considered that the victims of war, though remaining about absolutely the + same in number through the ages, were becoming relatively fewer. The Great + War of to-day would perhaps have disturbed his calculations, unless we may + assume that it will be followed by a tremendous reaction against war. For + when the war had lasted only nine months, it was estimated that if it + should continue at the present rate (and as a matter of fact its scale has + been much enlarged) for another twelve months, the total loss to Europe in + lives destroyed or maimed would be ten millions, about equal to + five-sixths of the whole young manhood of the German Empire, and nearly + the same number of victims as Lapouge reckoned as the normal war toll of a + whole half-century of European "civilisation." It is scarcely necessary to + add that all these bald estimates of the number of direct victims to war + give no clue to the moral and material damage—apart from all + question of injury to the race—done by the sudden or slow + destruction of so large a proportion of the young manhood of the world, + the ever widening circles of anguish and misery and destitution which + every fatal bullet imposes on humanity, for it is probable that for every + ten million soldiers who fall on the field, fifty million other persons at + home are plunged into grief or poverty, or some form of life-diminishing + trouble. + </p> + <p> + The foregoing considerations have not, however, brought us strictly within + the field of eugenics. They indicate the great extent to which war affects + the human breed, but they do not show that war affects the quality of the + breed, and until that is shown the eugenist remains undisturbed. + </p> + <p> + There are various circumstances which, at the outset, and even in the + absence of experimental verification, make it difficult, or impossible, + that even the bare mortality of war (for the eugenical bearings of war are + not confined to its mortality) should leave the eugenist indifferent. For + war never hits men at random. It only hits a carefully selected percentage + of "fit" men. It tends, in other words, to strike out, temporarily, or in + a fatal event, permanently, from the class of fathers, precisely that + percentage of the population which the eugenist wishes to see in that + class. This is equally the case in countries with some form of compulsory + service, and in countries which rely on a voluntary military system. For, + however an army is recruited, it is only those men reaching a fairly high + standard of fitness who are accepted, and these, even in times of peace + are hampered in the task of carrying on the race, which the less fit and + the unfit are free to do at their own good pleasure. Nearly all the ways + in which war and armies disturb the normal course of affairs seem likely + to interfere with eugenical breeding, and none to favour it. Thus at one + time, in the Napoleonic wars, the French age of conscription fell to + eighteen, while marriage was a cause of exemption, with the result of a + vast increase of hasty and ill-advised marriages among boys, certainly + injurious to the race. Armies, again, are highly favourable to the spread + of racial poisons, especially of syphilis, the most dangerous of all, and + this cannot fail to be, in a marked manner, dysgenic rather than eugenic. + </p> + <p> + The Napoleonic wars furnished the first opportunity of testing the truth + of Franklin's assertion concerning the disastrous effect of armies on the + race, by the collection of actual and precise data. But the significance + of the data proved unexpectedly difficult to unravel, and most writers on + the subject have been largely occupied in correcting the mistakes of their + predecessors. Villermé in 1829 remarked that the long series of French + wars up to 1815 must probably reduce the height of the French people, + though he was unable to prove that this was so. Dufau in 1840 was in a + better position to judge, and he pointed out in his <i>Traité de + Statistique</i> that, comparing 1816 and 1835, the number of young men + exempted from the army had doubled in the interval, even though the + regulation height had been lowered. This result, however, he held, was not + so alarming as it might appear, and probably only temporary, for it was + seemingly due to the fact that, in 1806 and the following years, the male + population was called to arms in masses, even youths being accepted, so + that a vast number of precocious marriages of often defective men took + place. The result would only be terrible, Dufau believed, if prolonged; + his results, however, were not altogether reliable, for he failed to note + the proportion of men exempted to those examined. The question was + investigated more thoroughly by Tschuriloff in 1876.[5] He came to the + conclusion that the Napoleonic wars had no great influence on stature, + since the regulation height was lowered in 1805, and abolished altogether + for healthy men in 1811, and any defect of height in the next generation + is speedily repaired. Tschuriloff agreed, however, that, though the + influence of war in diminishing the height of the race is unimportant, the + influence of war in increasing physical defects and infirmities in + subsequent generations is a very different matter. He found that the + physical deterioration of war manifested itself chiefly in the children + born eight years afterwards, and therefore in the recruits twenty-eight + years after the war. He regarded it as an undoubted fact that the French + army of half a million men in 1809 increased by 3 per cent. the proportion + of hereditarily infirm persons. He found, moreover, that the new-born of + 1814, that is to say the military class of 1834, showed that infirmities + had risen from 30 per cent. to 45.8 per cent., an increase of 50 per cent. + Nor is the <i>status quo</i> entirely brought back later on, for the bad + heredity of the increased number of defectives tends to be still further + propagated, even though in an attenuated form. As a matter of fact, + Tschuriloff found that the proportion of exemptions from the army for + infirmity increased enormously from 26 per cent. in 1816-17, to 38 per + cent. in 1826-27, declining later to 34 per cent. in 1860-64, though he is + careful to point out that this result must not be entirely ascribed to the + reversed selection of wars. There could, however, be no doubt that most + kinds of infirmities became more frequent as a result of military + selection. Lapouge's more recent investigation into the results of the + Franco-Prussian war of 1870 were of similar character; when examining the + recruits of 1892-93 he found that these "children of the war" were + inferior to those born earlier, and that there was probably an undue + proportion of defective individuals among their fathers. It cannot be said + that these investigations finally demonstrate the evil results of war on + the race. The subject is complicated, and some authorities, like Collignon + in France and Ammon in Germany,—both, it may be well to note, army + surgeons,—have sought to smooth down and explain away the dysgenic + effects of war. But, on the whole, the facts seem to support those + probabilities which the insight of Franklin first clearly set forth. + </p> + <p> + It is interesting in the light of these considerations on the eugenic + bearings of warfare to turn for a moment to those who proclaim the high + moral virtues of war as a national regenerator. + </p> + <p> + It is chiefly in Germany that, for more than a century past, this doctrine + has been preached.[6] "War invigorates humanity," said Hegel, "as storms + preserve the sea from putrescence." "War is an integral part of God's + Universe," said Moltke, "developing man's noblest attributes." "The + condemnation of war," said Treitschke, "is not only absurd, it is + immoral."[7] These brave sayings scarcely bear calm and searching + examination at the best, but, putting aside all loftier appeals to + humanity or civilisation, a "national regenerator" which we have good + reason to suppose enfeebles and deteriorates the race, cannot plausibly be + put before us as a method of ennobling humanity or as a part of God's + Universe, only to be condemned on pain of seeing a company of German + professors pointing the finger to our appalling "Immorality," on their + drill-sergeant's word of command. + </p> + <p> + At the same time, this glorification of the regenerating powers of war + quite overlooks the consideration that the fighting spirit tends to + destroy itself, so that the best way to breed good fighters is not to + preach war, but to cultivate peace, which is what the Germans have, in + actual practice, done for over forty years past. France, the most + military, and the most gloriously military, nation of the Napoleonic era, + is now the leader in anti-militarism, altogether indifferent to the lure + of military glory, though behind no nation in courage or skill. Belgium + has not fought for generations, and had only just introduced compulsory + military service, yet the Belgians, from their King and their + Cardinal-Archbishop downwards, threw themselves into the war with a high + spirit scarcely paralleled in the world's history, and Belgian commercial + travellers developed a rare military skill and audacity. All the world + admires the bravery with which the Germans face death and the elaborate + detail with which they organise battle, yet for all their perpetual + glorification of war there is no sign that they fight with any more spirit + than their enemies. Even if we were to feel ourselves bound to accept war + as "an integral part of God's Universe," we need not trouble ourselves to + glorify war, for, when once war presents itself as a terrible necessity, + even the most peaceable of men are equal to the task. + </p> + <p> + This consideration brings us to those "moral equivalents of war" which + William James was once concerned over, when he advocated, in place of + military conscription, "a conscription of the whole youthful population to + form for a certain number of years a part of the army enlisted against <i>Nature</i>."[8] + Such a method of formally organising in the cause of civilisation, instead + of in the cause of savagery, the old military traditions of hardihood and + discipline may well have its value. But the present war has shown us that + in no case need we fear that these high qualities will perish in any + vitally progressive civilisation. For they are qualities that lie in the + heart of humanity itself. They are not created by the drill-sergeant; he + merely utilises them for his own, as we may perhaps think, disastrous + ends. This present war has shown us that on every hand, even in the + unlikeliest places, all the virtues of war have been fostered by the + cultivation of the arts and sciences of peace, ready to be transformed to + warlike ends by men who never dreamed of war. In France we find many of + the most promising young scientists, poets, and novelists cheerfully going + forth to meet their death. On the other side, we find a Kreisler, created + to be the joy of the world, ready to be trampled to death beneath the + hoofs of Cossack horses. The friends of Gordon Mathison, the best student + ever turned out from the Medical Faculty of the Melbourne University and a + distinguished young physiologist who seemed to be destined to become one + of the first physicians of his time, viewed with foreboding his resolve to + go to the front, for "Wherever he was he had to be in the game," they + said; and a few weeks later he was killed at Gallipoli on the threshold of + his career. The qualities that count in peace are the qualities that count + in war, and the high-spirited man who throws himself bravely into the + dangerous adventures of peace is fully the equal of the hero of the + battlefield, and himself prepared to become that hero.[9] + </p> + <p> + It would seem, therefore, on the whole, that when the eugenist takes a + wide survey of this question, he need not qualify his disapproval of war + by any regrets over the loss of such virtues as warfare fosters. In every + progressive civilisation the moral equivalents of war are already in full + play. Peace, as well as war, "develops the noblest attributes of man"; + peace, rather than war, preserves the human sea from putrescence; it is + the condemnation of peace, rather than the condemnation of war, which is + not only absurd but immoral. We are not called upon to choose between the + manly virtues of war and the effeminate degeneracy of peace. The Great War + of to-day may perhaps help us to realise that the choice placed before us + is of another sort. The virtues of daring and endurance will never fail in + any vitally progressive community of men, alike in the causes of war and + of peace.[10] But on the one hand we find those virtues at work in the + service of humanity, creating ever new marvels of science and of art, + adding to the store of the precious heirlooms of the race which are a joy + to all mankind. On the other hand, we see these same virtues in the + service of savagery, extinguishing those marvels, killing their creators, + and destroying every precious treasure of mankind within reach. That—it + seems to be one of the chief lessons of this war—is the choice + placed before us who are to-day called upon to build the world of the + future on a firmer foundation than our own world has been set. + </p> + <p> + [1] D.S. Jordan, <i>War and the Breed</i>, 1915; also articles on "War and + Manhood" in the <i>Eugenics Review</i>, July, 1910, and on "The Eugenics + of War" in the same Review for Oct., 1913. + </p> + <p> + [2] J. Arthur Thomson, "Eugenics and War," <i>Eugenics Review</i>, April, + 1915. Major Leonard Darwin (<i>Journal Royal Statistical Society</i>, + March, 1916) sets forth a similar view. + </p> + <p> + [3] It is true that in the Gourdon cavern, in the Pyrenees, representing a + very late and highly developed stage of Magdalenian culture, there are + indications that human brains were eaten (Zaborowski, <i>L'Homme + Préhistorique</i>, p. 86). It is surmised that they were the brains of + enemies killed in battle, but this remains a surmise. + </p> + <p> + [4] Zaborowski, <i>L'Homme Préhistorique</i>, pp. 121, 139; Lapouge, <i>Les + Sélections Sociales</i>, p. 209. + </p> + <p> + [5] <i>Revue d'Anthropologie</i>, 1876, pp. 608 and 655. + </p> + <p> + [6] In France it is almost unknown except as preached by the Syndicalist + philosopher, Georges Sorel, who insists, quite in the German manner, on + the purifying and invigorating effects of "a great foreign war," although, + very unlike the German professors, he holds that "a great extension of + proletarian violence" will do just as well as war. + </p> + <p> + [7] The recent expressions of the same doctrine in Germany are far too + numerous to deal with. I may, however, refer to Professor Fritz Wilke's <i>Ist + der Krieg sittlich berechtigt?</i> (1915) as being the work of a + theologian and Biblical scholar of Vienna who has written a book on the + politics of Isaiah and discussed the germs of historical veridity in the + history of Abraham. "A world-history without war," he declares, "would be + a history of materialism and degeneration"; and again: "The solution is + not 'Weapons down!' but 'Weapons up!' With pure hands and calm conscience + let us grasp the sword." He dwells, of course, on the supposed purifying + and ennobling effects of war and insists that, in spite of its horrors, + and when necessary, "War is a divine institution and a work of love." The + leaders of the world's peace movement are, thank God! not Germans, but + merely English and Americans, and he sums up, with Moltke, that war is a + part of the moral order of the world. + </p> + <p> + [8] William James, <i>Popular Science Monthly</i>, Oct., 1910. + </p> + <p> + [9] We still often fall into the fallacy of over-estimating the advantages + of military training—with its fine air of set-up manliness and + restrained yet vitalised discipline—because we are mostly compelled + to compare such training with the lack of training fostered by that tame, + dull sedentary routine of which there is far too much in our present phase + of civilisation. The remedy lies in stimulating the heroic and strenuous + sides of civilisation rather than in letting loose the ravages of war. As + Nietzsche long since pointed out (<i>Human, All-too-Human</i>, section + 442), the vaunted national armies of modern times are merely a method of + squandering the most highly civilised men, whose delicately organised + brains have been slowly produced through long generations; "in our day + greater and higher tasks are assigned to men than <i>patria</i> and <i>honor</i>, + and the rough old Roman patriotism has become dishonourable, at the best + behind the times." + </p> + <p> + [10] The Border of Scotland and England was in ancient times, it has been + said, "a very Paradise for murderers and robbers." The war-like spirit was + there very keen and deeds of daring were not too scrupulously effected, + for the culprit knew that nothing was easier and safer than to become an + outlaw on the other side of the Border. Yet these were the conditions that + eventually made the Border one of the great British centres of genius (the + Welsh Border was another) and the home of a peculiarly capable and + vigorous race. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0004" id="link2H_4_0004"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + IV — MORALITY IN WARFARE + </h2> + <p> + There are some idealistic persons who believe that morality and war are + incompatible. War is bestial, they hold, war is devilish; in its presence + it is absurd, almost farcical, to talk about morality. That would be so if + morality meant the code, for ever unattained, of the Sermon on the Mount. + But there is not only the morality of Jesus, there is the morality of + Mumbo Jumbo. In other words, and limiting ourselves to the narrower range + of the civilised world, there is the morality of Machiavelli and Bismarck, + and the morality of St. Francis and Tolstoy. + </p> + <p> + The fact is, as we so often forget, and sometimes do not even know, + morality is fundamentally custom, the <i>mores</i>, as it has been called, + of a people. It is a body of conduct which is in constant motion, with an + exalted advance-guard, which few can keep up with, and a debased + rearguard, once called the black-guard, a name that has since acquired an + appropriate significance. But in the substantial and central sense + morality means the conduct of the main body of the community. Thus + understood, it is clear that in our time war still comes into contact with + morality. The pioneers may be ahead; the main body is in the thick of it. + </p> + <p> + That there really is a morality of war, and that the majority of civilised + people have more or less in common a certain conventional code concerning + the things which may or may not be done in war, has been very clearly seen + during the present conflict. This moral code is often said to be based on + international regulations and understandings. It certainly on the whole + coincides with them. But it is the popular moral code which is + fundamental, and international law is merely an attempt to enforce that + morality. + </p> + <p> + The use of expanding bullets and poison gases, the poisoning of wells, the + abuse of the Red Cross and the White Flag, the destruction of churches and + works of art, the infliction of cruel penalties on civilians who have not + taken up arms—all such methods of warfare as these shock popular + morality. They are on each side usually attributed to the enemy, they are + seldom avowed, and only adopted in imitation of the enemy, with hesitation + and some offence to the popular conscience, as we see in the case of + poison gas, which was only used by the English after long delay, while the + French still hesitated. The general feeling about such methods, even when + involving scientific skill, is that they are "barbarous." + </p> + <p> + As a matter of fact, this charge of "barbarism" against those methods of + warfare which shock our moral sense must not be taken too literally. The + methods of real barbarians in war are not especially "barbarous." They + have sometimes committed acts of cruelty which are revolting to us to-day, + but for the most part the excesses of barbarous warfare have been looting + and burning, together with more or less raping of women, and these + excesses have been so frequent within the last century, and still to-day, + that they may as well be called "civilised" as "barbarous." The sack of + Rome by the Goths at the beginning of the fifth century made an immense + impression on the ancient world, as an unparalleled outrage. St. Augustine + in his <i>City of God</i>, written shortly afterwards, eloquently + described the horrors of that time. Yet to-day, in the new light of our + own knowledge of what war may involve, the ways of the ancient Goths seem + very innocent. We are expressly told that they spared the sacred Christian + places, and the chief offences brought against them seem to be looting and + burning; yet the treasure they left untouched was vast and incalculable + and we should be thankful indeed if any belligerent in the war of to-day + inflicted as little injury on a conquered city as the Goths on Rome. The + vague rhetoric which this invasion inspired scarcely seems to be supported + by definitely recorded facts, and there can be very little doubt that the + devastation wrought in many old wars exists chiefly in the writings of + rhetorical chroniclers whose imaginations were excited, as we may so often + see among the journalists of to-day, by the rumour of atrocities which + have never been committed. This is not to say that no devastation and + cruelty have been perpetrated in ancient wars. It seems to be generally + agreed that in the famous Thirty Years' War, which the Germans fought + against each other, atrocities were the order of the day. We are + constantly being told, in respect of some episode or other of the war of + to-day, that "nothing like it has been seen since the Thirty Years' War." + But the writers who make this statement, with an off-hand air of familiar + scholarship, never by any chance bring forward the evidence for this + greater atrociousness of the Thirty Years' War,[1] and one is inclined to + suspect that this oft-repeated allusion to the Thirty Years' War as the + acme of military atrocity is merely a rhetorical flourish. + </p> + <p> + In any case we know that, not so many years after the Thirty Years' War, + Frederick the Great, who combined supreme military gifts with freedom from + scruple in policy, and was at the same time a great representative German, + declared that the ordinary citizen ought never to be aware that his + country is at war.[2] Nothing could show more clearly the military ideal, + however imperfectly it may sometimes have been attained, of the old + European world. Atrocities, whether regarded as permissible or as + inevitable, certainly occurred. But for the most part wars were the + concern of the privileged upper class; they were rendered necessary by the + dynastic quarrels of monarchs and were carried out by a professional class + with aristocratic traditions and a more or less scrupulous regard to + ancient military etiquette. There are many stories of the sufferings of + the soldiery in old times, in the midst of abundance, on account of + military respect for civilian property. Von der Goltz remarks that "there + was a time when the troops camped in the cornfields and yet starved," and + states that in 1806 the Prussian main army camped close to huge piles of + wood and yet had no fires to warm themselves or cook their food.[3] + </p> + <p> + The legend, if legend it is, of the French officer who politely requested + the English officer opposite him to "fire first" shows how something of + the ancient spirit of chivalry was still regarded as the accompaniment of + warfare. It was an occupation which only incidentally concerned the + ordinary citizen. The English, especially, protected by the sea and always + living in open undefended cities, have usually been able to preserve this + indifference to the continental wars in which their kings have constantly + been engaged, and, as we see, even in the most unprotected European + countries, and the most profoundly warlike, the Great Frederick set forth + precisely the same ideal of war. + </p> + <p> + The fact seems to be that while war is nowadays less chronic than of old, + less prolonged, and less easily provoked, it is a serious fallacy to + suppose that it is also less barbarous. We imagine that it must be so + simply because we believe, on more or less plausible grounds, that our + life generally is growing less barbarous and more civilised. But war, by + its very nature, always means a relapse from civilisation into barbarism, + if not savagery.[4] We may sympathise with the endeavour of the European + soldiers of old to civilise warfare, and we may admire the remarkable + extent to which they succeeded in doing so. But we cannot help feeling + that their romantic and chivalrous notions of warfare were absurdly + incongruous. + </p> + <p> + The world in general might have been content with that incongruity. But + Germany, or more precisely Prussia, with its ancient genius for warfare, + has in the present war taken the decisive step in initiating the abolition + of that incongruity by placing warfare definitely on the basis of + scientific barbarism. To do this is, in a sense, we must remember, not a + step backwards, but a step forward. It involved the recognition of the + fact that War is not a game to be played for its own sake, by a + professional caste, in accordance with fixed rules which it would be + dishonourable to break, but a method, carried out by the whole organised + manhood of the nation, of effectively attaining an end desired by the + State, in accordance with the famous statement of Clausewitz that war is + State policy continued by a different method. If by the chivalrous method + of old, which was indeed in large part still their own method in the + previous Franco-German war, the Germans had resisted the temptation to + violate the neutrality of Luxemburg and Belgium in order to rush behind + the French defences, and had battered instead at the Gap of Belfort, they + would have won the sympathy of the world, but they certainly would not + have won the possession of the greater part of Belgium and a third part of + France. It has not alone been military instinct which has impelled Germany + on the new course thus inaugurated. We see here the final outcome of a + reaction against ancient Teutonic sentimentality which the insight of + Goldwin Smith clearly discerned forty years ago.[5] Humane sentiments and + civilised traditions, under the moulding hand of Prussian leaders of + Kultur, have been slowly but firmly subordinated to a political realism + which, in the military sphere, means a masterly efficiency in the aim of + crushing the foe by overwhelming force combined with panic-striking + "frightfulness." In this conception, that only is moral which served these + ends. The horror which this "frightfulness" may be expected to arouse, + even among neutral nations, is from the German point of view a tribute of + homage. + </p> + <p> + The military reputation of Germany is so great in the world, and likely to + remain so, whatever the issue of the present war, that we are here faced + by a grave critical issue which concerns the future of the whole world. + The conduct of wars has been transformed before our eyes. In any future + war the example of Germany will be held to consecrate the new methods, and + the belligerents who are not inclined to accept the supreme authority of + Germany may yet be forced in their own interests to act in accordance with + it. The mitigating influence of religion over warfare has long ceased to + be exercised, for the international Catholic Church no longer possesses + the power to exert such influence, while the national Protestant churches + are just as bellicose as their flacks. Now we see the influence of + morality over warfare similarly tending to disappear. Henceforth, it + seems, we have to reckon with a conception of war which accounts it a + function of the supreme State, standing above morality and therefore able + to wage war independently of morality. Necessity—the necessity of + scientific effectiveness—becomes the sole criterion of right and + wrong. + </p> + <p> + When we look back from the standpoint of knowledge which we have reached + in the present war to the notions which prevailed in the past, they seem + to us hollow and even childish. Seventy years ago, Buckle, in his <i>History + of Civilisation</i>, stated complacently that only ignorant and + unintellectual nations any longer cherished ideals of war. His statement + was part of the truth. It is true, for instance, that France is now the + most anti-military of nations, though once the most military of all. But, + we see, it is only part of the truth. The very fact, which Buckle himself + pointed out, that efficiency has in modern times taken the place of + morality in the conduct of affairs, offers a new foundation for war when + war is urged on scientific principle for the purpose of rendering + effective the claims of State policy. To-day we see that it is not + sufficient for a nation to cultivate knowledge and become intellectual, in + the expectation that war will automatically go out of fashion. It is quite + possible to become very scientific, most relentlessly intellectual, and on + that foundation to build up ideals of warfare much more barbarous than + those of Assyria. + </p> + <p> + The conclusion seems to be that we are to-day entering on an era in which + war will not only flourish as vigorously as in the past, although not in + so chronic a form, but with an altogether new ferocity and ruthlessness, + with a vastly increased power of destruction, and on a scale of extent and + intensity involving an injury to civilisation and humanity which no wars + of the past ever perpetrated. Moreover, this state of things imposes on + the nations which have hitherto, by their temper, their position, or their + small size, regarded themselves as nationally neutral, a new burden of + armament in order to ensure that neutrality. It has been proclaimed on + both sides that this war is a war to destroy militarism. But the + disappearance of a militarism that is only destroyed by a greater + militarism offers no guarantee at all for any triumph of Civilisation or + Humanity. + </p> + <p> + What then are we to do? It seems clear that we have to recognise that our + intellectual leaders of old who declared that to ensure the disappearance + of war we have but to sit still and fold our hands while we watch the + beneficent growth of science and intellect were grievously mistaken. War + is still one of the active factors of modern life, though by no means the + only factor which it is in our power to grasp and direct. By our energetic + effort the world can be moulded. It is the concern of all of us, and + especially of those nations which are strong enough and enlightened enough + to take a leading part in human affairs, to work towards the initiation + and the organisation of this immense effort. In so far as the Great War of + to-day acts as a spur to such effort it will not have been an unmixed + calamity. + </p> + <p> + [1] In so far as it may have been so, that seems merely due to its great + length, to the fact that the absence of commissariat arrangements involved + a more thorough method of pillage, and to epidemics. + </p> + <p> + [2] Treitschke, <i>History of Germany</i> (English translation by E. and + C. Paul), Vol. I., p. 87. + </p> + <p> + [3] Von der Goltz, <i>The Nation in Arms</i>, pp. 14 <i>et seq.</i> This + attitude was a final echo of the ancient Truce of God. That institution, + which was first definitely formulated in the early eleventh century in + Roussillon and was soon confirmed by the Pope in agreement with nobles and + barons, was extended to the whole of Christendom before the end of the + century. It ordained peace for several days a week and on many festivals, + and it guaranteed the rights and liberties of all those following peaceful + avocations, at the same time protecting crops, live-stock, and farm + implements. + </p> + <p> + [4] It is interesting to observe how St. Augustine, who was as familiar + with classic as with Christian life and thought, perpetually dwells on the + boundless misery of war and the supreme desirability of peace as a point + at which pagan and Christian are at one; "Nihil gratius soleat audiri, + nihil desiderabilius concupisci, nihil postremo possit melius inveniri ... + Sicut nemo est qui gaudere nolit, ita nemo est qui pacem habere nolit" (<i>City + of God</i>, Bk. XIX., Chs. 11-12). + </p> + <p> + [5] <i>Contemporary Review</i>, 1878. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0005" id="link2H_4_0005"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + V — IS WAR DIMINISHING? + </h2> + <p> + The cheerful optimism of those pacifists who looked for the speedy + extinction of war has lately aroused much scorn. There really seem to have + been people who believed that new virtues of loving-kindness are springing + up in the human breast to bring about the universal reign of peace + spontaneously, while we all still continued to cultivate our old vices of + international greed, suspicion, and jealousy. Dr. Frederick Adams Woods, + in the challenging and stimulating study of the prevalence of war in + Europe from 1450 to the present day which he has lately written in + conjunction with Mr. Alexander Baltzly, easily throws contempt upon such + pacifists. All their beautiful arguments, he tells us in effect, count for + nothing. War is to-day raging more furiously than ever in the world, and + it is even doubtful whether it is diminishing. That is the subject of the + book Dr. Woods and Mr. Baltzly have written: <i>Is War Diminishing?</i> + </p> + <p> + The method adopted by these authors is to count up the years of war since + 1450 for each of the eleven chief nations of Europe possessing an ancient + history, and to represent the results by the aid of charts. These charts + show that certainly there has been a great falling off in war during the + period in question. Wars, as there presented to us, seem to have risen to + a climax in the century 1550-1650 and to have been declining ever since. + The authors, themselves, however, are not quite in sympathy with their own + conclusion. "There is only," Dr. Woods declares, "a moderate amount of + probability in favour of declining war." He insists on the fact that the + period under investigation represents but a very small fraction of the + life of man. He finds that if we take England several centuries further + back, and compare its number of war-years during the last four centuries + with those during the preceding four centuries, the first period shows 212 + years of war, the second shows 207 years, a negligible difference, while + for France the corresponding number of war-years are 181 and 192, an + actual and rather considerable increase. There is the further + consideration that if we regard not frequency but intensity of war—if + we could, for instance, measure a war by its total number of casualties—we + should doubtless find that wars are showing a tendency to ever-increasing + gravity. On the whole, Dr. Woods is clearly rather discontented with the + tendency of his own and his collaborator's work to show a diminution of + war, and modestly casts doubt on all those who believe that the tendency + of the world's history is in the direction of such a diminution. + </p> + <p> + An honest and careful record of facts, however, is always valuable. Dr. + Woods' investigation will be found useful even by those who are by no + means anxious to throw cold water over the too facile optimism of some + pacifists, and this little book suggests lines of thought which may prove + fruitful in various directions, not always foreseen by the authors. + </p> + <p> + Dr. Woods emphasises the long period in the history of the human race + during which war has flourished. He seems to suggest that war, after all, + may be an essential and beneficial element in human affairs, destined to + endure to the end, just as it has been present from the beginning. But has + it been present from the beginning? Even though war may have flourished + for many thousands of years—and it was certainly flourishing at the + dawn of history—we are still very far indeed from the dawn of human + life or even of human civilisation, for the more our knowledge of the past + grows the more remote that dawn is seen to be. It is not only seen to be + very remote, it is seen to be very important. Darwin said that it was + during the first three years of life that a man learnt most. That saying + is equally true of humanity as a whole, though here one must translate + years into hundreds of thousands of years. But neither infant man nor + infant mankind could establish themselves firmly on the path that leads so + far if they had at the very outset, in accordance with Dr. Woods' formula + for more recent ages, "fought about half the time." An activity of this + kind which may be harmless, or even in some degree beneficial at a later + stage, would be fatally disastrous at an early stage. War, as Mankind + understands war, seems to have no place among animals living in Nature. It + seems equally to have had no place, so far as investigation has yet been + able to reveal, in the life of early man. Men were far too busy in the + great fight against Nature to fight against each other, far too absorbed + in the task of inventing methods of self-preservation to have much energy + left for inventing methods of self-destruction. It was once supposed that + the Homeric stories of war presented a picture of life near the beginning + of the world. The Homeric picture in fact corresponds to a stage in human + barbarism, certainly in its European manifestation, a stage also passed + through in Northern Europe, where, nearly fifteen hundred years ago, the + Greek traveller, Posidonius, found the Celtic chieftains in Britain living + much like the people in Homer. But we now know that Homer, so far from + bringing before us a primitive age, really represents the end of a long + stage of human development, marked by a slow and steady growth in + civilisation and a vast accumulation of luxury. War is a luxury, in other + words a manifestation of superfluous energy, not possible in those early + stages when all the energies of men are taken up in the primary business + of preserving and maintaining life. So it was that war had a beginning in + human history. Is it unreasonable to suppose that it will also have an + end? + </p> + <p> + There is another way, besides that of counting the world's war-years, to + determine the probability of the diminution and eventual disappearance of + war. We may consider the causes of war, and the extent to which these + causes are, or are not, ceasing to operate. Dr. Woods passingly realises + the importance of this test and even enumerates what he considers to be + the causes of war, without, however, following up his clue. As he reckons + them, they are four in number: racial, economic, religious, and personal. + There is frequently a considerable amount of doubt concerning the cause of + a particular war, and no doubt the causes are usually mixed and slowly + accumulative, just as in disease a number of factors may have gradually + combined to bring on the sudden overthrow of health. There can be no doubt + that the four causes enumerated have been very influential in producing + war. There can, however, be equally little doubt that nearly all of them + are diminishing in their war-producing power. Religion, which after the + Reformation seemed to foment so many wars, is now practically almost + extinct as a cause of war in Europe. Economic causes which were once + regarded as good and sound motives for war have been discredited, though + they cannot be said to be abolished; in the Middle Ages fighting was + undoubtedly a most profitable business, not only by the booty which might + thus be obtained, but by the high ransoms which even down to the + seventeenth century might be legitimately demanded for prisoners. So that + war with France was regarded as an English gentleman's best method of + growing rich. Later it was believed that a country could capture the + "wealth" of another country by destroying that country's commerce, and in + the eighteenth century that doctrine was openly asserted even by + responsible statesmen; later, the growth of political economy made clear + that every nation flourishes by the prosperity of other nations, and that + by impoverishing the nation with which it traded a nation impoverishes + itself, for a tradesman cannot grow rich by killing his customers. So it + came about that, as Mill put it, the commercial spirit, which during one + period of European history was the principal cause of war, became one of + its strongest obstacles, though, since Mill wrote, the old fallacy that it + is a legitimate and advantageous method to fight for markets, has + frequently reappeared.[1] Again, the personal causes of war, although in a + large measure incalculable, have much smaller scope under modern + conditions than formerly. Under ancient conditions, with power centred in + despotic monarchs or autocratic ministers, the personal causes of war + counted for much. In more recent times it has been said, truly or falsely, + that the Crimean War was due to the wounded feelings of a diplomatist. + Under modern conditions, however, the checks on individual initiative are + so many that personal causes must play an ever-diminishing part in war. + </p> + <p> + The same can scarcely be said as regards Dr. Woods' remaining cause of + war. If by racialism we are to understand nationalism, this has of late + been a serious and ever-growing provocative of war. Internationalism of + feeling is much less marked now than it was four centuries ago. + Nationalities have developed a new self-consciousness, a new impulse to + regain their old territories or to acquire new territories. Not only + Pan-Germanism, Pan-Slavism, and British Imperialism, like all other + imperialisms, but even the national ambitions of some smaller Powers have + acquired a new and dangerous energy. They are not the less dangerous when, + as is indeed most frequently the case, they merely represent the ambition, + not of the people as a whole, but merely of a military or bureaucratic + clique, of a small chauvinistic group, yet noisy and energetic enough to + win over unscrupulous politicians. A German soldier, a young journalist of + ability, recently wrote home from the trenches: "I have often dreamed of a + new Europe in which all the nations would be fraternally united and live + together as one people; it was an end which democratic feeling seemed to + be slowly preparing. Now this terrible war has been unchained, fomented by + a few men who are sending their subjects, their slaves rather, to the + battlefield, to slay each other like wild beasts. I should like to go + towards these men they call our enemies and say, 'Brothers, let us fight + together. The enemy is behind us.' Yes, since I have been wearing this + uniform I feel no hatred for those who are in front, but my hatred has + grown for those in power who are behind." That is a sentiment which must + grow mightily with the growth of democracy, and as it grows the danger of + nationalism as a cause of war must necessarily decrease. + </p> + <p> + There is, however, one group of causes of war, of the first importance, + which Dr. Woods has surprisingly omitted, and that is the group of + political causes. It is by overlooking the political aspects of war that + Dr. Woods' discussion is most defective. Supposed political necessity has + been in modern times perhaps the very chief cause of war. That is to say + that wars are largely waged for what has been supposed to be the + protection, or the furtherance, of the civilised organisation which orders + the temporal benefits of a nation. This is admirably illustrated by all + three of the great European wars in which England has taken part during + the past four centuries: the war against Spain, the war against France, + and the present war against Germany. The fundamental motive of England's + participation in all these wars has been what was conceived to be the need + of England's safety, it was essentially political. A small island Power, + dependent on its fleet, and yet very closely adjoining the continental + mainland, is vitally concerned in the naval developments of possibly + hostile Powers and in the military movements which affect the opposite + coast. Spain, France, and Germany all successively threatened England by a + formidable fleet, and they all sought to gain possession of the coast + opposite England. To England, therefore, it seemed a measure of political + self-defence to strike a blow as each fresh menace arose. In every case + Belgium has been the battlefield on land. The neutrality of Belgium is + felt to be politically vital to England. Therefore, the invasion of + Belgium by a Great Power is to England an immediate signal of war. It is + not only England's wars that have been mainly political; the same is true + of Germany's wars ever since Prussia has had the leadership of Germany. + The political condition of a country without natural frontiers and + surrounded by powerful neighbours is a perpetual source of wars which, in + Germany's case, have been, by deliberate policy, offensively defensive. + </p> + <p> + When we realise the fundamental importance of the political causation of + warfare, the whole problem of the ultimate fate of war becomes at once + more hopeful. The orderly growth and stability of nations has in the past + seemed to demand war. But war is not the only method of securing these + ends, and to most people nowadays it scarcely seems the best method. + England and France have fought against each other for many centuries. They + are now convinced that they really have nothing to fight about, and that + the growth and stability of each country are better ensured by friendship + than by enmity. There cannot be a doubt of it. But where is the limit to + the extension of that same principle? France and Germany, England and + Germany, have just as much to lose by enmity, just as much to gain by + friendship, and alike on both sides. + </p> + <p> + The history of Europe and the charts of Mr. Baltzly clearly show that this + consideration has really been influential. We find that there is a + progressive tendency for the nations of Europe to abandon warfare. Sweden, + Denmark, and Holland, all vigorous and warlike peoples, have long ceased + to fight. They have found their advantage in the abandonment of war, but + that abandonment has been greatly stimulated by awe of their mightier + neighbours. And therein, again, we have a clue to the probable course of + the future. + </p> + <p> + For when we realise that the fundamental political need of + self-preservation and good order has been a main cause of warfare, and + when we further realise that the same ends may be more satisfactorily + attained without war under the influence of a sufficiently firm external + pressure working in harmony with the growth of internal civilisation, we + see that the problem of fighting among nations is the same as that of + fighting among individuals. Once upon a time good order and social + stability were maintained in a community by the method of fighting among + the individuals constituting the community. No doubt all sorts of precious + virtues were thus generated, and no doubt in the general opinion no better + method seemed possible or even conceivable. But, as we know, with the + development of a strong central Power, and with the growth of + enlightenment, it was realised that political stability and good order + were more satisfactorily maintained by a tribunal, having a strong police + force behind it, than by the method of allowing the individuals concerned + to fight out their quarrels between themselves. + </p> + <p> + Fighting between national groups of individuals stands on precisely the + same footing as fighting between individuals. The political stability and + good order of nations, it is beginning to be seen, can be more + satisfactorily maintained by a tribunal, having a strong police force + behind it, than by the method of allowing the individual nations concerned + to fight out quarrels between themselves. The stronger nations have for a + large part imposed this peace upon the smaller nations of Europe to the + great benefit of the latter. How can we impose a similar peace upon the + stronger nations, for their own benefit and for the benefit of the whole + world? To that task all our energies must be directed. + </p> + <p> + A long series of eminent thinkers and investigators, from Comte and Buckle + a century ago to Dr. Woods and Mr. Baltzly to-day, have assured us that + war is diminishing and even that the war-like spirit is extinct. It is + certainly not true that the war-like spirit is extinct, even in the most + civilised and peaceful peoples, and we need not desire its extinction, for + it is capable of transformation into shapes of the finest use for + humanity. But the vast conflagration of to-day must not conceal from our + eyes the great central fact that war is diminishing, and will one day + disappear as completely as the mediaeval scourge of the Black Death. To + reach this consummation all the best humanising and civilising energies of + mankind will be needed. + </p> + <p> + [1] It has been argued (as by Filippi Carli, <i>La Ricchezza e la Guerra</i>, + 1916) that the Germans are especially unable to understand that the + prosperity of other countries is beneficial to them, whether or not under + German control, and that they differ from the English and French in + believing that economic conquests should involve political conquests. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0006" id="link2H_4_0006"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + VI — WAR AND THE BIRTH-RATE + </h2> + <p> + During recent years the faith had grown among progressive persons in + various countries, not excluding Germany, that civilisation was building + up almost impassable barriers against any great war. These barriers were + thought to be of various kinds, even apart from the merely sentimental and + humanitarian developments of pacific feeling. They were especially of an + economic kind, and that on a double basis, that of Capital and that of + Labour. It was believed, on the one hand, that the international + ramifications of Capital, and the complicated commercial and financial + webs which bind nations together, would cause so vivid a realisation of + the disasters of war as to erect a wholesomely steadying effect whenever + the danger of war loomed in sight. On the other hand, it was felt that the + international unity of interest among the workers, the growth of Labour's + favourite doctrine that there is no conflict between nations, but only + between classes, and even the actual international organisation and bonds + of the workers' associations, would interpose a serious menace to the + plans of war-makers. These influences were real and important. But, as we + know, when the decisive moment came, the diplomatists and the militarists + were found to be at the helm, to steer the ship of State in each country + concerned, and those on board had no voice in determining the course. In + England only can there be said to have been any show of consulting + Parliament, but at that moment the situation had already so far developed + that there was little left but to accept it. The Great War of to-day has + shown that such barriers against war as we at present possess may crumble + away in a moment at the shock of the war-making machine. + </p> + <p> + We are to-day forced to undertake a more searching inquiry into the forces + which, in civilisation, operate against war. I wish to call attention here + to one such influence of fundamental character, which has not been + unrecognised, but possesses an importance we are often apt to overlook. + </p> + <p> + "A French gentleman, well acquainted with the constitution of his + country," wrote Thicknesse in 1776,[1] "told me above eight years since + that France increased so rapidly in peace that they must necessarily have + a war every twelve or fourteen years to carry off the refuse of the + people." Recently a well-known German Socialist, Dr. Eduard David, member + of the Reichstag and a student of the population question, setting forth + the same great truth (in <i>Die Neue Generation</i> for November, 1914) + states that it would have been impossible for Germany to wage the present + war if it had not been for the high German birth-rate during the past + half-century. And the impossibility of this war would, for Dr. David, have + been indeed tragic. + </p> + <p> + A more distinguished social hygienist, Professor Max Gruber, of Munich, + who took a leading part in organising that marvellous Exposition of + Hygiene at Dresden which has been Germany's greatest service to real + civilisation in recent years, lately set forth an identical opinion. The + war, he declares, was inevitable and unavoidable, and Germany was + responsible for it, not, he hastens to add, in any moral sense, but in a + biological sense, because in forty-four years Germans have increased in + numbers from forty millions to eighty millions. The war was, therefore, a + "biological necessity." + </p> + <p> + If we survey the belligerent nations in the war we may say that those + which took the initiative in drawing it on, or at all events were most + prepared to welcome it, were Russia, Austria, Germany, and Serbia. We may + also note that these include nearly all the nations in Europe with a high + birth-rate. We may further note that they are all nations which—putting + aside their cultural summits and taking them in the mass—are among + the most backward in Europe; the fall in the birth-rate has not yet had + time to permeate them. On the other hand, of the belligerent peoples of + to-day, all indications point to the French as the people most intolerant, + silently but deeply, of the war they are so ably and heroically waging. + Yet the France of the present, with the lowest birth-rate and the highest + civilisation, was a century ago the France of a birth-rate higher than + that of Germany to-day, the most militarist and aggressive of nations, a + perpetual menace to Europe. For all those among us who have faith in + civilisation and humanity, and are unable to believe that war can ever be + a civilising or humanising method of progress, it must be a daily prayer + that the fall of the birth-rate may be hastened. + </p> + <p> + It seems too elementary a point to insist on, yet the mists of ignorance + and prejudice are so dense, the cataract of false patriotism is so thick, + that for many even the most elementary truths cannot be discerned. In most + of the smaller nations, indeed, an intelligent view prevails. Their + smallness has, on the one hand, rendered them more open to international + culture, and, on the other hand, enabled them to outgrow the illusions of + militarism; there is a higher standard of education among them; their + birth-rates are low and they accept that fact as a condition of + progressive civilisation. That is the case in Switzerland, as in Norway, + and notably in Holland. It is not so in the larger nations. Here we + constantly find, even in those lands where the bulk of the population are + civilised and reasonably level-headed, a small minority who publicly tear + their hair and rage at the steady decline in the birth-rate. It is, of + course, only the declining birth-rate of their own country that they have + in view; for they are "patriots," which means that the fall of the + birth-rate in all other countries but their own is a source of much + gratification. "Woe to us," they exclaim in effect, "if we follow the + example of these wicked and degenerate peoples! Our nation needs men. We + have to populate the earth and to carry the blessings of our civilised + culture all over the world. In executing that high mission we cannot have + too much cannon-fodder in defending ourselves against the jealousy and + aggression of other nations. Let us promote parentage by law; let us + repress by law every influence which may encourage a falling birth-rate; + otherwise there is nothing left to us but speedy national disaster, + complete and irremediable." This is not caricature,[2] though these + apostles of "race-suicide" may easily arouse a smile by the verbal ardour + of their procreative energy. But we have to recognise that in Germany for + years past it has been difficult to take up a serious periodical without + finding some anxiously statistical article about the falling birth-rate + and some wild recommendations for its arrest, for it is the militaristic + German who of all Europeans is most worried by this fall; indeed Germans + often even refuse to recognise it. Thus to-day we find Professor Gruber + declaring that if the population of the German Empire continues to grow at + the rate of the first five years of the present century, at the end of the + century it will have reached 250,000,000. By such a vast increase in + population, the Professor complacently concludes, "Germany will be + rendered invulnerable." We know what that means. The presence of an + "invulnerable" nation among nations that are "vulnerable" means inevitable + aggression and war, a perpetual menace to civilisation and humanity. It is + not along that line that hope can be found for the world's future, or even + Germany's future, and Gruber conveniently neglects to estimate what, on + his basis, the population of Russia will be at the end of the century. But + Gruber's estimate is altogether fallacious. German births have fallen, + roughly speaking, about one per thousand of the population, every year + since the beginning of the century, and it would be equally reasonable to + estimate that if they continue to fall at the present rate (which we + cannot, of course, anticipate) births will altogether have ceased in + Germany long before the end of the century. The German birth-rate reached + its climax forty years ago (1871-1880) with 40.7 per 1,000; in 1906 it was + 34 per 1,000; in 1909, 31 per 1,000; in 1912, 28 per 1,000; in an almost + measurable period of time, in all probability long before the end of the + century, it will have reached the same low level as that of France, when + there will be little difference between the "invulnerability" of France + and of Germany, a consummation which, for the world's sake, is far more + devoutly to be wished than that anticipated by Gruber. + </p> + <p> + We have to remember, moreover, that this tendency is by no means, as we + are sometimes tempted to suppose, a sign of degeneration or of decay; but, + on the contrary, a sign of progress. When we survey broadly that course of + zoological evolution of which we are pleased to regard Man as the final + outcome, we note that on the whole the mighty stream has become the less + productive as it has advanced. We note the same of the various lines taken + separately. We note, also, that intelligence and all the qualities we + admire have usually been most marked in the less prolific species. + Progress, roughly speaking, has proved incompatible with high fertility. + And the reason is not far to seek. If the creature produced is more + evolved, it is more complex and more highly organised, and that means the + need for much time and much energy. To attain this, the offspring must be + few and widely spaced; it cannot be attained at all under conditions that + are highly destructive. The humble herring, which evokes the despairing + envy of our human apostles of fertility, is largely composed of spawn, and + produces a vast number of offspring, of which few reach maturity. The + higher mammals spend their lives in the production of a small number of + offspring, most of whom survive. Thus, even before Man began, we see a + fundamental principle established, and the relationship between the + birth-rate and the death-rate in working order. All progressive evolution + may be regarded as a mechanism for concentrating an ever greater amount of + energy in the production of ever fewer and ever more splendid individuals. + Nature is perpetually striving to replace the crude ideal of quantity by + the higher ideal of quality. + </p> + <p> + In human history these same tendencies have continually been illustrated. + The Greeks, our pioneers in all insight and knowledge, grappled (as + Professor Myres has lately set forth[3]), and realised that they were + grappling, with this same problem. Even in the Minoan Age their population + would appear to have been full to overflowing; "there were too many people + in the world," and to the old Greeks the Trojan War was the earliest + divinely-appointed remedy. Wars, famines, pestilences, colonisation, + wide-spread infanticide were the methods, voluntary and involuntary, by + which this excessive birth-rate was combated, while the greatest of Greek + philosophers, a Plato or an Aristotle, clearly saw that a regulated and + limited birth-rate, a eugenically improved race, is the road to higher + civilisation. We may even see in Greek antiquity how a sudden rise in + industrialism leads to a crowded and fertile urban population, the + extension of slavery, and all the resultant evils. It was a foretaste of + what was seen during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, when a + sudden industrial expansion led to an enormously high birth-rate, a + servile urban proletariat (that very word indicates, as Roscher has + pointed out, that a large family means inferiority), and a consequent + outburst of misery and degradation from which we are only now emerging. + </p> + <p> + As we are now able to realise, the sudden expansion of the population + accompanying the industrial revolution was an abnormal and, from the point + of view of society, a morbid phenomenon. All the evidence goes to show + that previously the population tended to increase very slowly, and social + evolution was thus able to take place equably and harmoniously. It is only + gradually that the birth-rate has begun to right itself again. The + movement, as is well known, began in France, always the most advanced + outpost of European civilisation. It has now spread to England, to + Germany, to all Europe, to the whole world indeed, in so far as the world + is in touch with European civilisation, and has long been well marked in + the United States. + </p> + <p> + When we realise this we are also enabled to realise how futile, how + misplaced, and how mischievous it is to raise the cry of "Race-suicide." + It is futile because no outcry can affect a world-wide movement of + civilisation. It is misplaced because the rise and fall of the population + is not a matter of the birth-rate alone, but of the birth-rate combined + with the death-rate, and while we cannot expect to touch the former we can + influence the latter. It is mischievous because by fighting against a + tendency which is not only inevitable but altogether beneficial, we blind + ourselves to the advance of civilisation and risk the misdirection of all + our energies. How far this blindness may be carried we see in the false + patriotism of those who in the decline of the birth-rate fancy they see + the ruin of their own particular country, oblivious of the fact that we + are concerned with a phenomenon of world-wide extension. + </p> + <p> + The whole tendency of civilisation is to reduce the birth-rate, as + Leroy-Beaulieu concludes in his comprehensive work on the population + question. We may go further, and assert with the distinguished German + economist, Roscher, that the chief cause of the superiority of a highly + civilised State over lower stages of civilisation is precisely a greater + degree of forethought and self-control in marriage and child-bearing.[4] + Instead of talking about race-suicide, we should do well to observe at + what an appalling rate, even yet, the population is increasing, and we + should note that it is everywhere the poorest and most primitive + countries, and in every country (as in Germany) the poorest regions, which + show the highest birth-rate. On every hand, however, are hopeful signs. + Thus, in Russia, where a very high birth-rate is to some extent + compensated by a very high death-rate—the highest infantile + death-rate in Europe—the birth-rate is falling, and we may + anticipate that it will fall very rapidly with the extension of education + and social enlightenment among the masses. Driven out of Europe, the + alarmist falls back on the "Yellow Peril." But in Japan we find amid + confused variations of the birth-rate and the death-rate nothing to + indicate any alarming expansion of the population, while as to China we + are in the dark. We only know that in China there is a high birth-rate + largely compensated by a very high death-rate. We also know, however, that + as Lowes Dickinson has lately reminded us, "the fundamental attitude of + the Chinese towards life is that of the most modern West,"[5] and we shall + probably find that with the growth of enlightenment the Chinese will deal + with their high birth-rate in a far more radical and thorough manner than + we have ever ventured on. + </p> + <p> + One last resort the would-be patriotic alarmist seeks when all others + fail. He is good enough to admit that a general decline in the birth-rate + might be beneficial. But, he points out, it affects social classes + unequally. It is initiated, not by the degenerate and the unfit, whom we + could well dispense with, but by the very best classes in the community, + the well-to-do and the educated. One is inclined to remark, at once, that + a social change initiated by its best social classes is scarcely likely to + be pernicious. Where, it may be asked, if not among the most educated + classes, is any process of amelioration to be initiated? We cannot make + the world topsy-turvy to suit the convenience of topsy-turvy minds. All + social movements tend to begin at the top and to permeate downwards. This + has been the case with the decline in the birth-rate, but it is already + well marked among the working classes, and has only failed to touch the + lowest social stratum of all, too weak-minded and too reckless to be + amenable to ordinary social motives. The rational method of meeting this + situation is not a propaganda in favour of procreation—a truly + imbecile propaganda, since it is only carried out and only likely to be + carried out, by the very class which we wish to sterilise—but by a + wise policy of regulative eugenics. We have to create the motives, and it + is not an impossible task, which will act even upon the weak-minded and + reckless lowest social stratum. + </p> + <p> + These facts have a significance which many of us have failed to realise. + The Great War has brought home the gravity of that significance. It has + been the perpetual refrain of the Pan-Germanists for many years that the + vast and sudden expansion of the German peoples makes necessary a new + movement of the German nations into the world and a new enlargement of + frontiers, in other words, War. It is not only among the Germans, though + among them it may have been more conscious, that a similar cause has led + to the like result. It has ever been so. The expanding nation has always + been a menace to the world and to itself. The arrest of the falling + birth-rate, it cannot be too often repeated, would be the arrest of all + civilisation and of all humanity. + </p> + <p> + [1] Ralph Thicknesse, <i>A Year's Journey Through France and Spain</i>, + 1777, p. 298. + </p> + <p> + [2] The last twelve words quoted are by Miss Ethel Elderton in an + otherwise sober memoir (<i>Report on the English Birth-rate</i>, 1914, p. + 237) which shows that the birth control movement has begun, just where we + should expect it to begin, among the better instructed classes. + </p> + <p> + [3] J.L. Myres, "The Causes of Rise and Fall in the Population of the + Ancient World," Eugenics Review, April, 1915. + </p> + <p> + [4] Roscher, <i>Grundlagen der Nationalkonomie</i>, 23rd ed., 1900, Bk. + VI. + </p> + <p> + [5] G. Lowes Dickinson, <i>The Civilisation of India, China, and Japan</i>, + 1914, p. 47. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0007" id="link2H_4_0007"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + VII — WAR AND DEMOCRACY + </h2> + <p> + When we read our newspapers to-day we are constantly met by ingenious + plans for bringing to an end the activities of Germany after the War. + German military activity, it is universally agreed, must be brought to an + end; Germany will have no further need of a military system save on the + most modest scale. Germany must also be deprived of any colonial empire + and shut out from eastward expansion. That being the case, Germany no + longer needs a fleet, and must be brought back to Bismarck's naval + attitude. Moreover, the industrial activities of Germany must also be + destroyed; the Allied opponents of Germany will henceforth manufacture for + themselves or for one another the goods they have hitherto been so foolish + as to obtain from Germany, and though this may mean cutting themselves + aloof from the country which has hitherto been their own best customer, + that is a sacrifice to be cheerfully borne for the sake of principle. It + is further argued that the world has no need of German activities in + science; they are, it appears, much less valuable than we had been led to + believe, and in any case no self-respecting people would encourage a + science tainted by Kultur. The puzzled reader of these arguments, + overlooking the fallacies they contain, may perhaps sometimes be tempted + to ask: But what are Germans to be allowed to do? The implied answer is + clear: Nothing. + </p> + <p> + The writers who urge these arguments with such conviction may be supposed + to have an elementary knowledge of the history of the Germans. We are + concerned, that is to say, with a people which has displayed an + irrepressible energy, in one field or another, ever since the time, more + than fifteen hundred years ago, when it excited the horror of the + civilised world by sacking Rome. The same energy was manifested, a + thousand years later, when the Germans again knocked at the door of Rome + and drew away half the world from its allegiance to the Church. Still more + recently, in yet other fields of industry and commerce and colonisation, + these same Germans have displayed their energy by entering into more or + less successful competition with that "Modern Rome," as some have termed + it, which has its seat in the British Islands. Here is a people,—still + youthful as we count age in our European world, for even the Celts had + preceded them by nearly a thousand years,—which has successfully + displayed its explosive or methodical force in the most diverse fields, + military, religious, economic. From henceforth it is invited, by an allied + army of terrified journalists, to expend these stupendous and irresistible + energies on just Nothing. + </p> + <p> + We know, of course, what would happen were it possible to subject Germany + to any such process of attempted repression. Whenever an individual or a + mass of individuals is bidden to do nothing, it merely comes about that + the activities aimed at, far from being suppressed, are turned into + precisely the direction most unpleasant for the would-be suppressors. When + in 1870 the Germans tried to "crush" France, the result was the reverse of + that intended. The effects of "crushing" had been even more startingly + reverse, on the other side—and this may furnish us with a precedent—when + Napoleon trampled down Germany. Two centuries ago, after the brilliant + victories of Marlborough, it was proposed to crush permanently the + Militarism of France. But, as Swift wrote to Archbishop King just before + the Peace of Utrecht, "limiting France to a certain number of ships and + troops was, I doubt, not to be compassed." In spite of the exhaustion of + France it was not even attempted. In the present case, when the war is + over it is probable that Germany will still hold sufficiently great + pledges to bargain with in safeguarding her own vital interests. If it + were not so, if it were possible to inflict permanent injury on Germany, + that would be the greatest misfortune that could happen to us; for it is + clear that we should then be faced by a yet more united and yet more + aggressively military Germany than the world has seen.[1] In Germany + itself there is no doubt on this point. Germans are well aware that German + activities cannot be brought to a sudden full stop, and they are also + aware that even among Germany's present enemies there are those who after + the War will be glad to become her friends. Any doubt or anxiety in the + minds of thoughtful Germans is not concerning the continued existence of + German energy in the world, but concerning the directions in which that + energy will be exerted. + </p> + <p> + What is Germany's greatest danger? That is the subject of a pamphlet by + Rudolf Goldscheid, of Vienna, now published in Switzerland, with a preface + by Professor Forel, as originally written a year earlier, because it is + believed that in the interval its conclusions have been confirmed by + events.[2] Goldscheid is an independent and penetrating thinker in the + economic field, and the author of a book on the principles of Social + Biology (<i>Höherentwicklung und Menschenökonomie</i>) which has been + described by an English critic as the ablest defence of Socialism yet + written. By the nature of his studies he is concerned with problems of + human rather than merely national development, but he ardently desires the + welfare of Germany, and is anxious that that welfare shall be on the + soundest and most democratic basis. After the War, he says, there must + necessarily be a tendency to approximate between the Central Powers and + one or other of their present foes. It is clear (though this point is not + discussed) that Italy, whose presence in the Triple Alliance was + artificial, will not return, while French resentment at German devastation + is far too great to be appeased for a long period to come. There remain, + therefore, Russia and England. After the War German interests and German + sympathies must gravitate either eastwards towards Russia or westwards + towards England. Which is it to be? + </p> + <p> + There are many reasons why Germany should gravitate towards Russia. Such a + movement was indeed already in active progress before the war, + notwithstanding Russia's alliance with France, and may easily become yet + more active after the war, when it is likely that the bonds between Russia + and France may grow weaker, and when it is possible that the Germans, with + their immense industry, economy and recuperative power, may prove to be in + the best position—unless America cuts in—to finance Russia. + Industrially Russia offers a vast field for German enterprise which no + other country can well snatch away, and German is already to some extent + the commercial language of Russia.[3] + </p> + <p> + Politically, moreover, a close understanding between the two supreme + autocratic and anti-democratic powers of Europe is of the greatest mutual + benefit, for any democratic movement within the borders of either Power is + highly inconvenient to the other, so that it is to the advantage of both + to stimulate each other in the task of repression.[4] It is this aspect of + the approximation which arouses Goldscheid's alarm. It is mainly on this + ground that he advocates a counter-balancing approximation between Germany + and England which would lay Germany open to the West and serve to develop + her latent democratic tendencies. He admits that at some points the + interests of Germany and England run counter to each other, but at yet a + greater number of points their interests are common. It is only by the + development of these common interests, and the consequent permeation of + Germany by democratic English ideas, that Goldscheid sees any salvation + from Czarism, for that is "Germany's greatest danger," and at the same + time the greatest danger to Europe. + </p> + <p> + That is Goldscheid's point of view. Our English point of view is + necessarily somewhat different. With our politically democratic tendencies + we see very little difference between Russia and Prussia. As they are at + present constituted, we have no wish to be in very close political + intimacy with either. It so happens, indeed, that, for the moment, the + chances of fellowship in War have brought us into a condition of almost + sentimental sympathy with the Russian people, such as has never existed + among us before. But this sympathy, amply justified, as all who know + Russia agree, is exclusively with the Russian people. It leaves the + Russian Government, the Russian bureaucracy, the Russian political system, + all that Goldscheid concentrates into the term "Czarism," severely alone. + Our hostility to these may be for the moment latent, but it is as profound + as it ever was. Czarism is even more remote from our sympathies than + Kaiserism. All that has happened is that we cherish the pious hope that + Russia is becoming converted to our own ideas on these points, although + there is not the smallest item of solid fact to support that hope. + Otherwise, Russian oppression of the Finns is just as odious to us as + Prussian oppression of the Poles, and Russian persecution of Liberals as + alien as German persecution of War-prisoners.[5] Our future policy, in the + opinion of many, should, however, be to isolate Germany as completely as + possible from English influence and to cultivate closer relations with + Russia.[6] Such a policy, Goldscheid argues, will defeat its own ends. The + more stringently England holds aloof from Germany the more anxiously will + Germany cultivate good relationships with Russia. Such relationships, as + we know, are easy to cultivate, because they are much in the interests of + both countries which possess so large an extent of common frontier and so + admirably supply each other's needs; it may be added also that the Russian + commercial world is showing no keen desire to enter into close relations + with England. Moreover, after the War, we may expect a weakening of French + influence in Russia, for that influence was largely based on French gold, + and a France no longer able or willing to finance Russia would no longer + possess a strong hold over Russia. A Russo-German understanding, difficult + to prevent in any case, is inimical to the interests of England, but it + would be rendered inevitable by an attempt on the part of England to + isolate Germany.[7] + </p> + <p> + Such an attempt could not be carried out completely and would break down + on its weakest side, which is the East. So that the way lies open to a + League of the Three Kaisers, the Dreikaiserbündnis which would form a + great island fortress of militarism and reaction amid the surrounding sea + of democracy, able to repress those immense possibilities of progress + within its own walls which would have been liberated by contact with the + vital currents outside. + </p> + <p> + So long as the War lasts it is the interest of England to strike Germany + and to strike hard. That is here assumed as certain. But when the War is + over, it will no longer be in the interests of England, it will indeed be + directly contrary to those interests, to continue cultivating hostility, + provided, that is, that no rankling wounds are left. The fatal mistake of + Bismarck in annexing Alsace-Lorraine introduced a poison into the European + organism which is working still. But the Russo-Japanese War produced a + more amicable understanding than had existed before, and the Boer War led + to still more intimate relationships between the belligerents. It may be + thought that the impression in England of German "frightfulness," and in + Germany of English "treachery," may prove ineffaceable. But the Germans + have been considered atrocious and the English perfidious for a long time + past, yet that has not prevented English and Germans fighting side by side + at Waterloo and on many another field; nor has it stood in the way of + German worship of the quintessential Englishman, Shakespeare, nor English + homage to the quintessential German Goethe. + </p> + <p> + The question of the future relations of England and Germany may, indeed, + be said to lie on a higher plane than that of interest and policy, vitally + urgent as their claims may be. It is the merit of Goldscheid's little book + that—with faith in a future United States of Europe in which every + country would develop its own peculiar aptitudes freely and harmoniously—he + is able to look at the War from that European standpoint which is so + rarely attained in England. He sees that more is at stake than a mere + question of national rivalries; that democracy is at stake, and the whole + future direction of civilisation. He looks beyond the enmities of the + moment, and he knows that, unless we look beyond them, we not only condemn + Europe to the prospect of unending war, we do more: we ensure the triumph + of Reaction and the destruction of Democracy. "War and Reaction are + brethren"; on that point Goldscheid is very sure, and he foretells and + laments the temporary "demolition of Democracy" in England. We have only + too much reason to believe his prophetic words, for since he wrote we have + had a Coalition Government which is predominantly democratic, Liberal and + Labour, and yet has been fatally impelled towards reaction and + autocracy.[8] That the impulse is really fatal and inevitable we cannot + doubt, for we see exactly the same movement in France, and even in Russia, + where it might seem that reaction has so few triumphs to achieve. "The + blood of the battlefield is the stream that drives the mills of Reaction." + The elementary and fundamental fact that in Democracy the officers obey + the men, while in Militarism the men obey the officers, is the key to the + whole situation. We see at once why all reactionaries are on the side of + war and a military basis of society. The fate of democracy in Europe hangs + on this question of adequate pacification. "Democratisation and + Pacification march side by side."[9] Unless we realise that fact we are + not competent to decide on a sound European policy. For there is an + intimate connection between a country's external policy and its internal + policy. An internal reactionary policy means an external aggressive + policy. To shut out English influence from Germany, to fortify German + Junkerism and Militarism, to drive Germany into the arms of a yet more + reactionary Russia, is to create a perpetual menace, alike to peace and to + democracy, which involves the arrest of civilisation. However magnanimous + the task may seem to some, it is not only the interest of England, but + England's duty to Europe, to take the initiative in preparing the ground + for a clear and good understanding with Germany. It is, moreover, only + through England that France can be brought into harmonious relations with + Germany, and when Russia then approaches her neighbour it will be in + sympathy with her more progressive Western Allies and not in reactionary + response to a reactionary Germany. It is along such lines as these that + amid the confusion of the present we may catch a glimpse of the Europe of + the future. + </p> + <p> + We have to remember that, as Goldscheid reminds us, this War is making all + of us into citizens of the world. A world-wide outlook can no longer be + reserved merely for philosophers. Some of the old bridges, it is true, + have been washed away, but on every side walls are falling, and the petty + fears and rivalries of European nations begin to look worse than trivial + in the face of greater dangers. As our eyes begin to be opened we see + Europe lying between the nether millstone of Asia and the upper millstone + of America. It is not by constituting themselves a Mutual Suicide Club + that the nations of Europe will avoid that peril.[10] A wise and + far-seeing world-policy can alone avail, and the enemies of to-day will + see themselves compelled, even by the mere logic of events, to join hands + to-morrow lest a worse fate befall them. In so doing they may not only + escape possible destruction, but they will be taking the greatest step + ever taken in the organisation of the world. Which nation is to assume the + initiative in such combined organisation? That remains the fateful + question for Democracy. + </p> + <p> + [1] Treitschke in his <i>History</i> (Bk. I., Ch. III.) has well described + "the elemental hatred which foreign injury pours into the veins of our + good-natured people, for ever pursued by the question: 'Art thou yet on + thy feet, Germania? Is the day of thy revenge at hand!'" + </p> + <p> + [2] Rudolf Goldscheid, <i>Deutschlands Grösste Gefahr</i>, Institut Orell + Füssli, Zürich, 1916. + </p> + <p> + [3] One may remark that up to the outbreak of war fifty per cent. of the + import trade of Russia has been with Germany. To suppose that that immense + volume of trade can suddenly be transferred after the war from a + neighbouring country which has intelligently and systematically adapted + itself to its requirements to a remote country which has never shown the + slightest aptitude to meet those requirements argues a simplicity of mind + which in itself may be charming, but when translated into practical + affairs it is stupendous folly. + </p> + <p> + [4] Sir Valentine Chirol remarks of Bismarck, in an Oxford Pamphlet on + "Germany and the Fear of Russia":—"Friendship with Russia was one of + the cardinal principles of his foreign policy, and one thing he always + relied upon to make Russia amenable to German influence was that she + should never succeed in healing the Polish sore." + </p> + <p> + [5] In making these observations on the Russians and the Prussians, I do + not, of course, overlook the fact that all nations, like individuals, + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + "Compound for sins they are inclined to + By damning those they have no mind to," +</pre> + <p> + and the English treatment of the conscientious objector in the Great War + has been just as odious as Russian treatment of the Finns or Prussian + treatment of war prisoners, and even more foolish, since it strikes at our + own most cherished principles. + </p> + <p> + [6] There is, indeed, another school which would like to shut off all + foreign countries by a tariff wall and make the British Empire mutually + self-supporting, on the economic basis adopted by those three old ladies + in decayed circumstances who subsisted by taking tea in one another's + houses. + </p> + <p> + [7] Even if partially successful, as has lately been pointed out, the + greater the financial depression of Germany the greater would be the + advantage to Russia of doing business with Germany. + </p> + <p> + [8] It may be proper to point out that I by no means wish to imply that + democracy is necessarily the ultimate and most desirable form of political + society, but merely that it is a necessary stage for those peoples that + have not yet reached it. Even Treitschke in his famous <i>History</i>, + while idealising the Prussian State, always assumes that movement towards + democracy is beneficial progress. For the larger question of the + comparative merits of the different forms of political society, see an + admirable little book by C. Delisle Burns, <i>Political Ideals</i> (1915). + And see also the searching study, <i>Political Parties</i> (English + translation, 1915), by Robert Michels, who, while accepting democracy as + the highest political form, argues that practically it always works out as + oligarchy. + </p> + <p> + [9] Professor D.S. Jordan has quoted the letter of a German officer to a + friend in Roumania (published in the Bucharest <i>Adverul</i>, 21 Aug., + 1915): "How difficult it was to convince our Emperor that the moment had + arrived for letting loose the war, otherwise Pacifism, Internationalism, + Anti-Militarism, and so many other noxious weeds would have infected our + stupid people. That would have been the end of our dazzling nobility. We + have everything to gain by the war, and all the chimeras and stupidities + of democracy will be chased from the world for an infinite time." + </p> + <p> + [10] "Let us be patient," a Japanese is reported to have said lately, + "until Europe has completed her <i>hara-kiri</i>." + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0008" id="link2H_4_0008"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + VIII — FEMINISM AND MASCULINISM + </h2> + <p> + During more than a century we have seen the slow but steady growth of the + great Women's movement, of the movement of Feminism in the wide sense of + that term. The conquests of this movement have sometimes been described by + rhetorical feminists as triumphs over "Man." That is scarcely true. The + champions of Feminism have nearly as often been men as women, and the + forces of Anti-feminism have been the vague massive inert forces of an + order which had indeed made the world in an undue degree "a man's world," + but unconsciously and involuntarily, and by an instrumentation which was + feminine as well as masculine. The advocates of Woman's Rights have seldom + been met by the charge that they were unjustly encroaching on the Rights + of Man. Feminism has never encountered an aggressive and self-conscious + Masculinism. + </p> + <p> + Now, however, when the claims of Feminism are becoming practically + recognised in our social life, and some of its largest demands are being + granted, it is interesting to observe the appearance of a new attitude. We + are, for the first time, beginning to hear of "Masculinism." Just as + Feminism represents the affirmation of neglected rights and functions of + Womanhood, so Masculinism represents the assertion of the rights and + functions of Manhood which, it is supposed, the rising tide of Feminism + threatens to submerge. + </p> + <p> + Those who proclaim the necessity of an assertion of the rights of + Masculinism usually hold up America as an awful example of the triumph of + Feminism. Thus Fritz Voechting in a book published in Germany, "On the + American Cult of Woman," is appalled by what he sees in the United States. + To him it is "the American danger," and he thinks it may be traced partly + to the influence of the matriarchal system of the American Indians on the + early European invaders and partly to the effects of co-education in + undermining the fundamental conceptions of feminine subordination. This + state of things is so terrible to the German mind, which has a + constitutional bias to masculinism, that to Herr Voechting America seems a + land where all the privileges have been captured by Woman and nothing is + left to Man, but, like a good little boy, to be seen and not heard. That + is a slight exaggeration, as other Germans, even since the War, have + pointed out in German periodicals. Even if it were true, however, as a + German Feminist has remarked, it would still be a pleasant variation from + a rule we are so familiar with in the Old World. That it should be put + forward at all indicates the growing perception of a cleavage between the + claims of Masculinism and the claims of Feminism. + </p> + <p> + It is not altogether easy at present to ascertain whom we are to recognise + as the champions and representatives of Masculinism. Various notable + figures are mentioned, from Nietzsche to Mr. Theodore Dreiser. Nietzsche, + however, can scarcely be regarded as in all respects an opponent to + Feminism, and some prominent feminists even count themselves his + disciples. One may also feel doubtful whether Mr. Dreiser feels himself + called upon to put on the armour of masculinism and play the part assigned + to him. Another distinguished novelist, Mr. Robert Herrick, whose name has + been mentioned in this connection, is probably too well-balanced, too + comprehensive in his outlook, to be fairly claimed as a banner-bearer of + masculinism. The name of Strindberg is most often mentioned, but surely + very unfortunately. However great Strindberg's genius, and however acute + and virulent his analysis of woman, Strindberg with his pronounced + morbidity and sensitive fragility seems a very unhappy figure to put + forward as the ideal representative of the virtues of masculinity. Much + the same may be said of Weininger. The name of Mr. Belfort Bax, once + associated with William Morris in the Socialistic campaign, may fairly be + mentioned as a pioneer in this field. For many years he has protested + vigorously against the encroachment of Feminism, and pointed out the + various privileges, social and legal, which are possessed by women to the + disadvantage of men. But although he is a distinguished student of + philosophy, it can scarcely be said that Mr. Bax has clearly presented in + any wide philosophic manner the demands of the masculinistic spirit or + definitely grasped the contest between Feminism and Masculinism. The name + of William Morris would be an inspiring battle-cry if it could be fairly + raised on the side of Masculinism. Unfortunately, however, the masculine + figures scarcely seem eager to put on the armour of Masculinism. They are + far too sensitive to the charm of Womanhood ever to rank themselves + actively in any anti-feministic party. At the most they remain neutral. + </p> + <p> + Thus it is that the new movement cannot yet be regarded as organised. + There is, however, a temptation for those among us who have all their + lives been working in the cause of Feminism to belittle the future + possibilities of Masculinism. There can be no doubt that all civilisation + is now, and always has been to some extent, on the side of Feminism. + Wherever a great development of civilisation has occurred—whether in + ancient Egypt, or in later Rome, or in eighteenth-century France—there + the influence of woman has prevailed, while laws and social institutions + have taken on a character favourable to women. The whole current of + civilisation tends to deprive men of the privileges which belong to brute + force, and to confer on them the qualities which in ruder societies are + especially associated with women. Whenever, as in the present great + European War, brute force becomes temporarily predominant, the causes + associated with Feminism are roughly pushed into the background. It is, + indeed, the War which gives a new actuality to this question. War has + always been regarded as the special and peculiar province of Man, indeed, + the sacred refuge of the masculine spirit and the ultimate appeal in human + affairs. That is not the view of Feminism, nor yet the standpoint of + Eugenics. Yet, to-day, in spite of all our homage to Feminism and + Eugenics, we witness the greatest war of the world. It is an instructive + spectacle from our present point of view. We realise, for one thing, how + futile it is for Feminism to adopt the garb of masculine militancy. The + militancy of the Suffragettes, which looked so brave and imposing in times + of peace, disappeared like child's play at the first touch of real + militancy. That was patriotic of the Suffragettes, no doubt; but it was + also a necessary measure of self-preservation, for non-combatants who + carry bombs about in time of war, when armed sentries are swarming + everywhere, are not likely to have much time for hunger-striking. + </p> + <p> + We witness another feature of war which has a bearing on Eugenics. It is + sometimes said that war is necessary for the preservation of heroic and + virile qualities which, without war and the cultivation of military + ideals, would be lost to the race, and that so the race would degenerate. + To-day France, which is the chief seat of anti-Militarism, and Belgium, a + land of peaceful industrialism which had no military service until a few + years ago, and England, which has always been content to possess a + contemptible little army, and Russia whose popular ideals are humane and + mystical, have sent to the front swarms of professional men and clerks and + artisans and peasants who had never occupied themselves with war at all. + Yet these men have proved as heroic and even as skilful in the game of war + as the men of Germany, where war is idolised and where the practice of + military virtues and military exercises is regarded as the highest + function alike of the individual and of the State. We see that we need not + any longer worry over the possible extinction of these heroic qualities. + What we may more profitably worry over is the question whether there is + not some higher and nobler way of employing them than in the destruction + of the finest fruits of civilisation and the slaughter of those very + stocks on which Eugenics mainly relies for its materials. + </p> + <p> + We can also realise to-day that war is not only an opportunity for the + exercise of virtues. It is also an opportunity for the exercise of vices. + "War is Hell" said Sherman, and that is the opinion of most great + reflective soldiers. We see that there is nothing too brutal, too cruel, + too cowardly, too mean, and too filthy for some, at all events, of modern + civilised troops to commit, whether by, or against, the orders of their + officers. In France, a few months before the present War, I found myself + in a railway train at Laon with two or three soldiers; a young woman came + to the carriage door, but, seeing the soldiers, she passed on; they were + decent, well-behaved men, and one of them remarked, with a smile, on the + suspicion which the military costume arouses in women. Perhaps, however, + it is a suspicion that is firmly based on ancient traditions. There is the + fatally seamy side of be-praised Militarism, and there Feminism has a + triumphant argument. + </p> + <p> + In this connection I may allude in passing to a little conflict between + Masculinism and Feminism which has lately taken place in Germany. Germany, + as we know, is the country where the claims of Masculinism are most loudly + asserted, and those of Feminism treated with most contempt. It is the + country where the ideals of men and of women are in sharpest conflict. + There has been a great outcry among men in Germany against the "treachery" + and "unworthiness" of German women in bestowing chocolates and flowers on + the prisoners, as well as doing other little services for them. The + attitude towards prisoners approved by the men—one trusts it is not + to be regarded as a characteristic outcome of Masculinism—is that of + petty insults, of spiteful cruelty, and mean deprivations. Dr. Helene + Stöcker, a prominent leader of the more advanced band of German Feminists, + has lately published a protest against this treatment of enemies who are + helpless, unarmed, and often wounded—based, not on sentiment, but on + the highest and most rational grounds—which is an honour to German + women and to their Feminist leaders.[1] + </p> + <p> + Taken altogether, it seems probable that when this most stupendous of wars + is ended, it will be felt—not only from the side of Feminism, but + even of Masculinism,—that War is merely an eruption of ancient + barbarism which in its present virulent forms would not have been + tolerated even by savages. Such methods are hopelessly out of date in days + when wars may be engineered by a small clique of ambitious politicians and + self-interested capitalists, while whole nations fight, with or without + enthusiasm, merely because they have no choice in the matter. All the + powers of civilisation are working towards the elimination of wars. In the + future, it seems evident, militarism will not furnish the basis for the + masculinistic spirit. It must seek other supports. + </p> + <p> + That is what will probably happen. We must expect that the increasing + power of women and of the feminine influence will be met by a more + emphatic and a more rational assertion of the qualities of men and the + masculine spirit in life. It was unjust and unreasonable to subject women + to conditions that were primarily made by men and for men. It would be + equally unjust and unreasonable to expect men to confine their activities + within limits which are more and more becoming adjusted to feminine + preferences and feminine capacities. We are now learning to realise that + the <i>tertiary</i> physical, and psychic sexual differences—those + distinctions which are only found on the average, but on the average are + constant[2]—are very profound and very subtle. A man is a man + throughout, a woman is a woman throughout, and that difference is manifest + in all the energies of body and soul. The modern doctrine of the internal + secretions—the hormones which are the intimate stimulants to + physical and psychic activity in the organism—makes clear to us one + of the deepest and most all-pervading sources of this difference between + men and women. The hormonic balance in men and women is unlike; the + generative ferments of the ductless glands work to different ends.[3] + Masculine qualities and feminine qualities are fundamentally and eternally + distinct and incommensurate. Energy, struggle, daring, initiative, + originality, and independence, even though sometimes combined with + rashness, extravagance, and defect, seem likely to remain qualities in + which men—<i>on the average</i>, it must be remembered—will be + more conspicuous than women. Their manifestation will resist the efforts + put forth to constrain them by the feminising influences of life. + </p> + <p> + Such considerations have a real bearing on the problem of Eugenics. As I + view that problem, it is first of all concerned, in part with the + acquisition of scientific knowledge concerning heredity and the influences + which affect heredity; in part with the establishment of sound ideals of + the types which the society of the future demands for its great tasks; and + in part—perhaps even in chief part—with the acquisition of a + sense of personal responsibility. Eugenic legislation is a secondary + matter which cannot come at the beginning. It cannot come before our + knowledge is firmly based and widely diffused; it cannot come until we are + clear as to the ideals which we wish to see embodied in human character + and human action; it cannot come until the sense of personal + responsibility towards the race is so widely spread throughout the + community that its absence is universally felt to be either a crime or a + disease. + </p> + <p> + I fear that point of view is not always accepted in England and still less + in America. It is widely held throughout the world that America is not + only the land of Feminism, but the land in which laws are passed on every + possible subject, and with considerable indifference as to whether they + are carried out, or even whether they could be carried out. This tendency + is certainly well illustrated by eugenic legislation in the United States. + In the single point of sterilisation for eugenic ends—and I select a + point which is admirable in itself and for which legislation is perhaps + desirable—at least twelve States have passed laws. Yet most of these + laws are a dead letter; every one of them is by the best experts + considered at some point unwise; and the remarkable fact remains that the + total number of eugenical sterilising operations performed in the States + <i>without any law at all</i> is greater than the total of those performed + under the laws. So that the laws really seem to have themselves a + sterilising effect on a most useful eugenic operation.[4] + </p> + <p> + I refrain from mentioning the muddles and undesigned evils produced by + other legislation of a much less admirable nature.[5] But I may perhaps be + allowed to mention that it has seemed to some observers that there is a + connection between the Feminism of America and the American mania for + hasty laws which will not, and often cannot, be carried out in practice. + Certainly there is no reason to suppose that women are firmly antagonistic + to such legislation. Nice, pretty, virtuous little laws, complete in every + detail, seem to appeal irresistibly to the feminine mind. (And, of course, + many men have feminine minds.) It is true that such laws are only meant + for show. But then women are so accustomed to things that are only meant + for show, and are well aware that if one attempted to use such things they + would fall to pieces at once. + </p> + <p> + However that may be, we shall probably find at last that we must fall back + on the ancient truth that no external regulation, however pretty and + plausible, will suffice to lead men and women to the goal of any higher + social end. We must realise that there can be no sure guide to fine living + save that which comes from within, and is supported by the firmly + cultivated sense of personal responsibility. Our prayer must still be the + simple, old-fashioned prayer of the Psalmist: "Create in me a clean heart, + O God"—and to Hell with your laws! + </p> + <p> + In other words, our aim must be to evolve a social order in which the + sense of freedom and the sense of responsibility are both carried to the + highest point, and that is impossible by the aid of measures which are + only beneficial for the children of Perdition. That there are such beings, + incapable alike either of freedom or of responsibility, we have to + recognise. It is our business to care for them—until with the help + of eugenics we can in some degree extinguish their stocks—in such + refuges and reformatories as may be found desirable. But it is not our + business to treat the whole world as a refuge and a reformatory. That is + fatal to human freedom and fatal to human responsibility. By all means + provide the halt and the lame with crutches. But do not insist that the + sound and the robust shall never stir abroad without crutches. The result + will only be that we shall all become more or less halt and lame. + </p> + <p> + It is only by such a method as this—by segregating the hopelessly + feeble members of society and by allowing the others to take all the risks + of their freedom and responsibility even though we strongly disapprove—that + we can look for the coming of a better world. It is only by such a method + as this that we can afford to give scope to all those varying and + ever-contradictory activities which go to the making of any world worth + living in. For Conflict, even the conflict of ideals, is a part of all + vital progress, and each party to the conflict needs free play if that + conflict is to yield us any profit. That is why Masculinists have no right + to impede the play of Feminism, and Feminists no right to impede the play + of Masculinism. The fundamental qualities of Man, equally with the + fundamental qualities of Woman, are for ever needed in any harmonious + civilisation. There is a place for Masculinism as well as a place for + Feminism. From the highest standpoint there is not really any conflict at + all. They alike serve the large cause of Humanity, which equally includes + them both. + </p> + <p> + [1] "Würdelose Weiber," <i>Die Neue Generation</i>, Aug.-Sept., 1914. + </p> + <p> + [2] Havelock Ellis, <i>Man and Woman</i>, fifth ed., 1914, p. 21. + </p> + <p> + [3] The conception of sexuality as dependent on the combined operation of + various internal ductless glands, and not on the sexual glands proper + alone, has been especially worked out by Professor W. Blair Bell, <i>The + Sex Complex</i>, 1916. + </p> + <p> + [4] H.H. Laughlin, <i>The Legal, Legislative, and Administrative Aspects + of Sterilisation</i>, Eugenics Record Office Bulletin, No. 1, OB, 1914. + </p> + <p> + [5] I have discussed these already in a chapter of my book, <i>The Task of + Social Hygiene</i>. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0009" id="link2H_4_0009"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + IX — THE MENTAL DIFFERENCES OF MEN AND WOMEN + </h2> + <p> + The Great War, which has changed so many things, has nowhere effected a + greater change than in the sphere of women's activities. In all the + belligerent countries women have been called upon to undertake work which + they had never been offered before. Europe has thus become a great + experimental laboratory for testing the aptitudes of women. The results of + these tests, as they are slowly realised, cannot fail to have permanent + effects on the sexual division of labour. It is still too early to speak + confidently as to what those effects will be. But we may be certain that, + whatever they are, they can only spring from deep-lying natural + distinctions. + </p> + <p> + The differences between the minds of men and the minds of women are, + indeed, presented to all of us every day. It should, therefore, we might + imagine, be one of the easiest of tasks to ascertain what they are. And + yet there are few matters on which such contradictory and often + extravagant opinions are maintained. For many people the question has not + arisen; there are no mental differences, they seem to take for granted, + between men and women. For others the mental superiority of man at every + point is an unquestionable article of faith, though they may not always go + so far as to agree with the German doctor, Mobius, who boldly wrote a book + on "The Physiological Weak-mindedness of Women." For others, again, the + predominance of men is an accident, due to the influences of brute force; + let the intelligence of women have freer play and the world generally will + be straightened out. + </p> + <p> + In these conflicting attitudes we may trace not only the confidence we are + all apt to feel in our intimate knowledge of a familiar subject we have + never studied, but also the inevitable influence of sexual bias. Of such + bias there is more than one kind. There is the egoistic bias by which we + are led to regard our own sex as naturally better than any other could be, + and there is the altruistic bias by which we are led to find a charming + and mysterious superiority in the opposite sex. These different kinds of + sexual bias act with varying force in particular cases; it is usually + necessary to allow for them. + </p> + <p> + Notwithstanding the fantastic divergencies of opinion on this matter, it + seems not impossible to place the question on a fairly sound and rational + base. In so complex a question there must always be room for some + variations of individual opinion, for no two persons can approach the + consideration of it with quite the same prepossessions, or with quite the + same experience. + </p> + <p> + At the outset there is one great fundamental fact always to be borne in + mind: the difference of the sexes in physical organisation. That we may + term the <i>biological</i> factor in determining the sexual mental + differences. A strong body does not involve a strong brain nor a weak body + a weak brain; but there is still an intimate connection between the + organisation of the body generally and the organisation of the brain, + which may be regarded as an executive assemblage of delegates from all + parts of the body. Fundamental differences in the organisation of the body + cannot fail to involve differences in the nervous system generally, and + especially in that supreme collection of nervous ganglia which we term the + brain. In this way the special adaptation of woman's body to the exercise + of maternity, with the presence of special organs and glands subservient + to that object, and without any important equivalents in man's body, + cannot fail to affect the brain. We now know that the organism is largely + under the control of a number of internal secretions or hormones, which + work together harmoniously in normal persons, influencing body and mind, + but are liable to disturbance, and are differently balanced and with a + different action in the two sexes.[1] It is not, we must remember, by any + means altogether the exercise of the maternal function which causes the + difference; the organs and aptitudes are equally present even if the + function is not exercised, so that a woman cannot make herself a man by + refraining from childbearing. + </p> + <p> + In another way this biological factor makes itself felt, and that is in + the differences in the muscular systems of men and women. These we must + also consider fundamental. Although the extreme muscular weakness of + average civilised women as compared to civilised men is certainly + artificial and easily possible to remove by training, yet even in savages, + among whom the women do most of the muscular work, they seldom equal or + exceed the men in strength; any superiority, when it exists, being mainly + shown in such passive forms of exertion as bearing burdens. In + civilisation, even under the influence of careful athletic training, women + are unable to compete muscularly with men; and it is a significant fact + that on the variety stage there are very few "strong women." It would seem + that the difficulty in developing great muscular strength in women is + connected with the special adaptation of woman's form and organisation to + the maternal function. But whatever the cause may be, the resulting + difference is one which has a very real bearing on the mental distinctions + of men and women. It is well ascertained that what we call "mental" + fatigue expresses itself physiologically in the same bodily manifestation + as muscular fatigue. The avocations which we commonly consider mental are + at the same time muscular; and even the sensory organs, like the eye, are + largely muscular. It is commonly found in various great business + departments where men and women may be said to work more or less side by + side that the work of women is less valuable, largely because they are not + able to bear additional strain; under pressure of extra work they give in + before men do. It is noteworthy that the claims for sick benefit made by + women under the National Insurance System in England have proved much + greater (even three times greater) than the actuaries anticipated + beforehand; while the Sick Insurance Societies of Germany, France, + Austria, and Switzerland also report that women are ill oftener and for + longer periods than men. Largely, no doubt, that is due to the special + strain and the rigid monotony of our modern industrial system, but not + entirely. Nearly two hundred years ago (in 1729) Swift wrote of women to + Bolingbroke: "I protest I never knew a very deserving person of that sex + who had not too much reason to complain of ill-health." The regulations of + the world have been mainly made by men on the instinctive basis of their + own needs, and until women have a large part in making them on the basis + of their needs, women are not likely to be so healthy as men. + </p> + <p> + This by no means necessarily implies any mental inferiority; it is much + more the result of muscular inferiority. Even in the arts muscular + qualities count for much and are often essential, since a solid muscular + system is needed even for very delicate actions; the arts of design demand + muscular qualities; to play the violin is a muscular strain, and only a + robust woman can become a famous singer. + </p> + <p> + The greater precocity of girls is another aspect of the biological factor + in sexual mental differences. It is a psychic as well as a physical fact. + This has been shown conclusively by careful investigation in many parts of + the civilised world and notably in America, where the school system + renders such sexual comparison easy and reliable at all ages. There can + now be no doubt that a girl at, let us say, the age of fourteen is on the + average taller and heavier than a boy at the same age, though the degrees + of this difference and the precise age at which it occurs vary with the + individual and the race. Corresponding to this is a mental difference; in + many branches of study, though not all, the girl of fourteen is superior + to the boy, quicker, more intelligent, gifted with a better memory. + Precocity, however, is a quality of dubious virtue. It is frequently + found, indeed, in men of the highest genius; but, on the other hand, it is + found among animals and among savages, and is here of no good augury. Many + observers of the lower races have noted how the child is highly + intelligent and well disposed, but seems to degenerate as he grows older; + In the comparison of girls and boys, both as regards physical and mental + qualities, it is constantly found that while the girls hold their own, and + in many respects more than hold their own, with boys up to the age of + fifteen or sixteen, after that the girls remain almost or quite + stationary, while in the boys the curve of progress is continued without + interruption. Some people have argued, hypothetically, that the greater + precocity of girls is an artificial product of civilisation, due to the + confined life of girls, produced, as it were, by the artificial + overheating of the system in the hothouse of the home. This is a mistake. + The same precocity of girls appears to exist even among the uncivilised, + and independently of the special circumstances of life. It is even found + among animals also, and is said to be notably obvious in giraffes. It will + hardly be argued that the female giraffe leads a more confined and + domestic life than her brother. + </p> + <p> + Yet another aspect of the biological factor is to be found in the bearing + of heredity on this question. To judge by the statements that one + sometimes sees, men and women might be two distinct species, separately + propagated. The conviction of some men that women are not fitted to + exercise various social and political duties, and the conviction of some + women that men are a morally inferior sex, are both alike absurd, for they + both rest on the assumption that women do not inherit from their fathers, + nor men from their mothers. Nothing is more certain than that—when, + of course, we put aside the sexual characters and the special qualities + associated with those characters—men and women, on the average, + inherit equally from both of their parents, allowing for the fact that + that heredity is controlled and modified by the special organisation of + each sex. There are, indeed, various laws of heredity which qualify this + statement, and notably the tendency whereby extremes of variation are more + common in the male sex—so that genius and idiocy are alike more + prevalent in men. But, on the whole, there can be no doubt that the + qualities of a man or of a woman are a more or less varied mixture of + those of both parents; and, even when there is no blending, both parents + are almost equally likely to be influential in heredity. The good + qualities of the one parent will therefore benefit the child of the + opposite sex, and the bad qualities will equally be transmitted to the + offspring of opposite sex. + </p> + <p> + There is another element in the settlement of this question which may also + be fairly called objective, and that is the <i>historical</i> factor. We + are prone to believe that the particular status of the sexes that prevails + among ourselves corresponds to a universal and unchangeable order of + things. In reality this is far from being the case. It may, indeed, be + truly said that there is no kind of social position, no sort of avocation, + public or domestic, among ourselves exclusively appertaining to one sex, + which has not at some time or in some part of the world belonged to the + opposite sex, and with the most excellent results. We regard it as alone + right and proper for a man to take the initiative in courtship, yet among + the Papuans of New Guinea a man would think it indecorous and ridiculous + to court a girl; it was the girl's privilege to take the initiative in + this matter, and she exercised it with delicacy and skill and the best + moral results, until the shocked missionaries upset the native system and + unintentionally introduced looser ways. There is, again, no implement + which we regard as so peculiarly and exclusively feminine as the needle. + Yet in some parts of Africa a woman never touches a needle; that is man's + work, and a wife who can show a neglected rent in her petticoat is even + considered to have a fair claim for a divorce. Innumerable similar + examples appear when we consider the human species in time and space. The + historical aspect of this matter may thus be said in some degree to + counterbalance the biological aspect. If the fundamental constitution of + the sexes renders their mental characters necessarily different, the + difference is still not so pronounced as to prevent one sex sometimes + playing effectively the parts which are generally played by the other sex. + </p> + <p> + It is not necessary to go outside the white European race to find + evidences of the reality of this historical factor of the question before + us. It would appear that at the dawn of European civilisation women were + taking a leading part in the evolution of human progress. Various + survivals which are enshrined in the myths and legends of classic + antiquity show us the most ancient deities as goddesses; and, moreover, we + encounter the significant fact that at the origin nearly all the arts and + industries were presided over by female, not by male, deities. In Greece, + as well as in Asia Minor, India, and Egypt, as Paul Lafargue has pointed + out, woman seems to have taken divine rank before men; all the first + inventions of the more useful arts and crafts, except in metals, are + ascribed to goddesses; the Muses presided over poetry and music long + before Apollo; Isis was "the lady of bread," and Demeter taught men to sow + barley and corn instead of eating each other. Thus even among our own + forefathers we may catch a glimpse of a state of things which, as various + anthropologists have shown (notably Otis Mason in his <i>Woman's Share in + Primitive Culture</i>), we may witness in the most widely separated parts + of the world. Thus among the Xosa Kaffirs, as well as other A-bantu + stocks, Fritsch states that "the man claims for himself war, hunting, + occupation with cattle; all household cares, even the building of the + house, as well as the cultivation of the ground, are woman's affair; + hardly in the most laborious work will a man lend a hand."[2] So that when + to-day we see women entering the most various avocations, that is not a + dangerous innovation, but perhaps merely a return to ancient and natural + conditions. + </p> + <p> + It is not until specialisation becomes necessary and until men are + relieved from the constant burden of battle and the chase that the + frequent superiority of woman is lost. The modern industrial activities + are dangerous, when they are dangerous, not because the work is too hard—for + the work of primitive women is harder—but because it is an + unnaturally and artificially dreary and monotonous work which stifles the + mind, depresses the spirits, and injures the body, so that, it is said, 40 + per cent. of married women who have been factory girls are treated for + pelvic disorders before they are thirty. It is the conditions of women's + work which need changing in order that they may become, like those of + primitive women, so various that they develop the mind and fortify the + body. This, however, is an evil which will be righted by the development + of the mechanical side of industry, for machines tend constantly to become + larger, heavier, speedier, more numerous and more automatic, requiring + fewer workers to tend them, and these more frequently men.[3] + </p> + <p> + It may be added that the early predominance of woman in the work of + civilisation is altogether independent of that conception of a primitive + matriarchate, or government of women, which was set forth some fifty years + ago by Bachofen, and has since caused so much controversy. Descent in the + female line, not uncommonly found among primitive peoples, undoubtedly + tended to place women in a position of great influence; but it by no means + necessarily involved any gynecocracy, or rule of women, and such rule is + merely a hypothesis which by some enthusiasts has been carried to absurd + lengths. + </p> + <p> + We see, therefore, that when we are approaching the question of the mental + differences of the sexes among ourselves to-day, it is not impossible to + find certain guiding clues which will save us from running into + extravagance in either direction. + </p> + <p> + Without doubt the only way in which we can obtain a satisfactory answer to + the numerous problems which meet us when we approach the question is by + experiment. I have, indeed, insisted on the importance of these + preliminary biological and historical considerations mainly because they + indicate with what safety and freedom from risk we may trust to + experiment. The sexes are far too securely poised by organic constitution + and ancient tradition for any permanently injurious results to occur from + the attempt to attain a better social readjustment in this matter. When + the experiment fails, individuals may to some extent suffer, but social + equilibrium swiftly and automatically rights itself. Practically, however, + nearly every social experiment of this kind means that certain + restrictions limiting the duties or privileges of women are removed, and + when artificial coercions are thus taken away it can merely happen, as + Mary Wollstonecraft long ago put it, that by the common law of gravity the + sexes fall into their proper places. That, we may be sure, will be the + final result of the interesting experiments for which the laboratory + to-day is furnished by all the belligerent countries. + </p> + <p> + Definitely formulated statistical data of these results are scarcely yet + available. But we may study the action of this natural process on one + great practical experiment in mental sexual differences which has been + going on for some time past. At one time in the various administrations of + the International Postal Union there was a sudden resolve to introduce + female labour to a very large extent; it was thought that this would be + cheaper than male labour and equally efficient. There was consequently a + great outcry at the ousting of male labour, the introduction of the thin + end of a wedge which would break up society. We can now see that that + outcry was foolish. Within recent years nearly all the countries which + previously introduced women freely into their postal and telegraph + services are now doing so only under certain conditions, and some are + ceasing to admit them at all. This great practical experiment, carried out + on an immense scale in thirty-five different countries, has, on the whole, + shown that while women are not inferior to men, at all events within the + ordinary range of work, the substitution of a female for a male staff + always means a considerable increase of numbers, that women are less rapid + than men, less able to undertake the higher grade work, less able to exert + authority over others, more lacking both in initiative and in endurance, + while they require more sick leave and lose interest and energy on + marriage. The advantages of female labour are thus to some extent + neutralised, and in the opinions of the administrations of some countries + more than neutralised, by certain disadvantages. The general result is + that men are found more fitted for some branches of work and women more + fitted for other branches; the result is compensation without any tendency + for one sex to oust the other. + </p> + <p> + It may, indeed, be objected that in practical life no perfectly + satisfactory experiments exist as to the respective mental qualities of + men and women, since men and women are never found working under + conditions that are exactly the same for both sexes. If, however, we turn + to the psychological laboratory, where it is possible to carry on + experiments under precisely identical conditions, the results are still + the same. There are nearly always differences between men and women, but + these differences are complex and manifold; they do not always agree; they + never show any general piling up of the advantages on the side of one sex + or of the other. In reaction-time, in delicacy of sensory perception, in + accuracy of estimation and precision of movement, there are nearly always + sexual differences, a few that are fairly constant, many that differ at + different ages, in various countries, or even in different groups of + individuals. We cannot usually explain these differences or attach any + precise significance to them, any more than we can say why it is that (at + all events in America) blue is most often the favourite colour of men and + red of women. We may be sure that these things have a meaning, and often a + really fundamental significance, but at present, for the most part, they + remain mysterious to us. + </p> + <p> + When we attempt to survey and sum up all the variegated facts which + science and practical life are slowly accumulating with reference to the + mental differences between men and women[4] we reach two main conclusions. + On the one hand there is a fundamental equality of the sexes. It would + certainly appear that women vary within a narrower range than men—that + is to say, that the two extremes of genius and of idiocy are both more + likely to show themselves in men. This implies that the pioneers in + progress are most likely to be men. That, indeed, may be said to be a + biological fact. "In all that concerns the evolution of ornamental + characters the male leads; in him we see the trend which evolution is + taking; the female and young afford us the measure of their advance along + the new line which has to be taken."[5] In the human sphere of the arts + and sciences, similarly, men, not women, take the lead. That men were the + first decorative artists, rather than women, is indicated by the fact that + the natural objects designed by early pre-historic artists were mainly + women and wild beasts, that is to say, they were the work of masculine + hunters, executed in idle intervals of the chase. But within the range in + which nearly all of us move, there are always many men who in mental + respects can do what most women can do, many women who can do what most + men can do. We are not justified in excluding a whole sex absolutely from + any field. In so doing we should certainly be depriving the world of some + portion of its executive ability. The sexes may always safely be left to + find their own levels. + </p> + <p> + On the other hand, the mental diversity of men and women is equally + fundamental. It is rooted in organisation. The well-intentioned efforts of + many pioneers in women's movements to treat men and women as identical, + and, as it were, to force women into masculine moulds, were both + mischievous and useless. Women will always be different from men, mentally + as well as physically. It is well for both sexes that it should be so. It + is owing to these differences that each sex can bring to the world's work + various aptitudes that the other lacks. It is owing to these differences + also that men and women have their undying charm for each other. We cannot + change them, and we need not wish to. + </p> + <p> + [1] See, for instance, Blair Bell's <i>The Sex Complex</i>, 1916, though + the deductions drawn in this book must not always be accepted without + qualifications. + </p> + <p> + [2] G. Fritsch, <i>Die Eingeborene Süd-Afrikas</i>, 1892, p. 79. + </p> + <p> + [3] 1 D.R. Malcolm Keir, "Women in Industry," <i>Popular Science Monthly</i>, + October, 1913. + </p> + <p> + [4] See, for many of the chief of these, Havelock Ellis, <i>Man and Woman</i>, + 5th Edition, 1914. + </p> + <p> + [5] W.P. Pycraft, <i>The Courtship of Animal</i>, p. 9. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0010" id="link2H_4_0010"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + X — THE WHITE SLAVE CRUSADE + </h2> + <p> + During recent years we have witnessed a remarkable attempt—more + popular and more international in character than any before—to deal + with that ancient sexual evil which has for some time been picturesquely + described as the White Slave Traffic. Less than forty years ago Professor + Sheldon Amos wrote that this subject can scarcely be touched upon by + journalists, and "can never form a topic of common conversation." Nowadays + Churches, societies, journalists, legislators have all joined the ranks of + the agitators. Not only has there been no voice on the opposite side, + which was scarcely to be expected—for there has never been any + anxiety to cry aloud the defence of "White Slavery" from the house-tops—but + there has been a new and noteworthy conquest over indifference and over + that sacred silence which was supposed to encompass all sexual topics with + suitable darkness. The banishment of that silence in the cause of social + hygiene is, indeed, not the least significant feature of this agitation. + </p> + <p> + It is inevitable, however, that these periodical fits of virtuous + indignation by which Society is overtaken should speedily be spent. The + victim of the moral fever finds himself exhausted by the struggle, + scarcely able to cope with the complications of the disease, and, at the + best, only too anxious to forget what he has passed through. He has an + uneasy feeling that in the course of his delirium he has said and done + many foolish things which it would now be unpleasant to recall too + precisely. + </p> + <p> + There is no use in attempting to disguise the fact that this is what + happened in the White Slave Traffic agitation. It became clear that we had + been largely misled in regard to the evils to be combated, and that we + were seduced into sanctioning various remedies for these evils which in + cold blood it is impossible to approve of, even if we could believe them + to be effective. + </p> + <p> + It is not even clear that all those who have talked about the "White Slave + Traffic" have been quite sure what they meant by the term. Some people, + indeed, have seemed to think that it meant prostitution in general. That + is, of course, an absurd misapprehension. We are concerned with a trade + which flourishes on prostitution, but that trade is not itself the trade + or (as some prefer to call it) the profession of prostitutes. Indeed, the + prostitute, under ordinary conditions and unharassed by persecution, is in + many respects anything but a slave. She is much less a slave than the + ordinary married woman. She is not fettered in humble dependence on the + will of a husband from whom it is the most difficult thing in the world to + escape; she is bound to no man and free to make her own terms in life; + while if she should have a child, that child is absolutely her own, and + she is not liable to have it torn from her arms by the hands of the law. + Apart from arbitrary and accidental circumstances, due to the condition of + social feeling, the prostitute enjoys a position of independence which the + married woman is still struggling to obtain. + </p> + <p> + The White Slave Traffic, therefore, is not prostitution; it is the <i>commercialised + exploitation of prostitutes</i>. The independent prostitute, living alone, + scarcely lends herself to the White Slave trader. It is on houses of + prostitution, where the less independent and usually weaker-minded + prostitutes are segregated, that the traffic is based. Such houses cannot + even exist without such traffic. There is little inducement for a girl to + enter such a house, in full knowledge of what it involves, on her own + initiative. The proprietors of such houses must therefore give orders for + the "goods" they desire, and it is the business of procurers, by + persuasion, misrepresentation, deceit, intoxication, to supply them. "The + White Slave Traffic," as Kneeland states, "is thus not only a hideous + reality, but a reality almost wholly dependent on the existence of houses + of prostitution," and as the authors of <i>The Social Evil</i> state, it + is "the most shameful species of business enterprise in modern times."[1] + </p> + <p> + In this intimate dependence of the White Slave Traffic on houses of + prostitution, there lies, it may be pointed out, a hope for the future. We + are concerned, for the most part, with the more coarse-grained part of the + masculine population and with the more ignorant, degraded, and weak-minded + part of the army of prostitutes. Although much has been said of the + enormous extension of the White Slave Traffic during recent years, it is + important to remember that that extension is chiefly marked in connection + with the great new centres of population in the younger countries. It is + fostered by the conditions prevailing in crude, youthful, prosperous, but + incompletely blended, communities, which have too swiftly attained luxury, + but have not yet attained the more humane and refined developments of + civilisation, and among whom women are often scarce.[2] Although there are + not yet any very clear signs of the decay of prostitution in civilisation, + there can hardly be a doubt that civilisation is unfavourable to houses of + prostitution. They offer no inducements to the more intelligent and + independent prostitutes, and their inmates usually present little + attraction to any men save those whose demands are of the humblest + character. There is, therefore, a tendency to the natural and spontaneous + decay of organised houses of prostitution under modern civilised + conditions; the prostitute and her clients alike shun such houses. Along + this line we may foresee the disappearance of the White Slave Traffic, + apart altogether from any social or legal attempts at its direct + suppression.[3] + </p> + <p> + It is sometimes said that the relation of the isolated prostitute to her + <i>souteneur</i> constitutes a form of "white slavery." Undoubtedly that + may sometimes be the case. We are here in a confused field where the facts + are complicated by a number of considerations, and where circumstances may + very widely differ, for the "fancy boy"—selected from affection by + the prostitute herself—may easily become the <i>souteneur</i>, or + "cadet" as he is termed in New York, who seduces and trains to + prostitution a large number of girls. The prostitute is so often a little + weak in character and a little defective in intelligence; she is so often + regarded as a legitimate prey by the world in which she moves, and a + legitimate object of contempt and oppression by the social world above her + and its legal officers, that she easily becomes abjectly dependent on the + man who in some degree protects her from this extortion, contempt, and + oppression, even though he sometimes trains her to his own ends and + exploits her professional activities for his own advantage. These + circumstances so often occur that some investigators consider that they + represent the general rule. No doubt they are the most conspicuous cases. + But they can scarcely be regarded as representing the normal relations of + the prostitute to the man she is attracted to. She is earning her own + living, and if she possesses a little modicum of character and + intelligence, she knows that she can choose her own lover and dismiss him + when she so pleases. He may beat her occasionally, but all over the world + this is not always displeasing to the primitively feminine woman. "It is + indeed true," as Kneeland remarks, "that many prostitutes do not believe + their lovers care for them unless they 'beat them up' occasionally." The + woman in this position is not more of a "white slave" than many wives, and + some husbands, who submit to the whims and tyrannies of their conjugal + partners, with, indeed, the additional hardship and misfortune that they + are legally bound to them. And the <i>souteneur</i>, although from the + respectable point of view he has put himself into a low-down moral + position, is, after all, not so very unlike those parasitic wives who, on + a higher social level, live lazily on their husbands' professional + earnings, and sometimes give much less than the <i>souteneur</i> in + return. + </p> + <p> + When, however, we put aside the complicated question of the prostitute's + relationship to the man who is her lover, protector, and "bully," we have + to recognise that there really is a "White Slave Traffic," carried on in a + ruthlessly business-like manner and on an international scale, with + watchful agents, men and women, ever ready to detect and lure the victims. + But even this too amply demonstrated fact was not found sufficiently + highly spiced by the White Slave Traffic agitators. It was necessary to + excite the public mind by sensational incidents. Everyone was told + stories, as of incidents that had lately occurred in the next street, of + innocent, refined, and well-bred girls who were snatched away by infamous + brigands beneath the eyes of their friends, to be immured in dungeons of + vice and never more heard of. Such incidents, if they ever occurred, would + be too bizarre to be justifiably taken into account in great social + movements. But it is even doubtful whether they ever occur. The White + Slave traders are not heroes of romance, even of infamous romance; less + so, indeed, than many more ordinary criminals; they are engaged in a very + definite and very profitable business. They have no need to run serious + risks. The world is full of girls who are over-worked, ill-paid, ignorant, + weak, vain, greedy, lazy, or even only afflicted with a little innocent + love of adventure, and it is among these that White Slave traders may + easily find what their business demands, while experience enables them to + detect the most likely subjects. + </p> + <p> + Careful inquiry, even among those who have made it their special business + to collect all the evidence that can be brought together to prove the + infamous character of the White Slave Traffic, has apparently failed to + furnish any reliable evidence of these sensational stories. It is easy to + find prostitutes who are often dissatisfied with the life (in what + occupation is it not easy?), but it is not easy to find prostitutes who + cannot escape from that life when they sufficiently wish to do so, and are + willing to face the difficulty of finding some other occupation. The very + fact that the whole object of their exploitation is to bring them in + contact with men belonging to the outside world is itself a guarantee that + they are kept in touch with that world. Mrs. Billington-Grieg, a + well-known pioneer in social movements, has carefully investigated the + alleged cases of forcible abduction which were so freely talked about when + the White Slave Bill was passed into law in England, but even the + Vigilance Societies actively engaged in advocating the bill could not + enable her to discover a single case in which a girl had been entrapped + against her will.[4] No other result could reasonably have been expected. + When so many girls are willing, and even eager, to be persuaded, there is + little need for the risky adventure of capturing the unwilling. The uneasy + realisation of these facts cannot fail to leave many honest Vice-Crusaders + with unpleasant memories of their past. + </p> + <p> + It is not only in regard to alleged facts, but also in regard to proposed + remedies, that the White Slave Agitation may properly be criticised. In + England it distinguished itself by the ferocity with which the lash was + advocated, and finally legalised. Benevolent bishops joined with genteel + old maids in calling loudly for whips, and even in desiring to lay them + personally on the backs of the offenders, notwithstanding that these + Crusaders were nominally Christians, the followers of a Master who + conspicuously reserved His indignation, not for sinners and law-breakers, + but for self-satisfied saints and scrupulous law-keepers—just the + same kind of excellent people, in fact, who are most prone to become + Vice-Crusaders. Here again, it is probable, many unpleasant memories have + been stored up. + </p> + <p> + It is well recognised by criminologists that the lash is both a barbarous + and an ineffective method of punishment. "The history of flagellation," as + Collas states in his great work on this subject, "is the history of a + moral bankruptcy."[5] The survival of barbarous punishments from barbarous + days, when ferocious punishments were a matter of course and the death + penalty was inflicted for horse-stealing without in the least diminishing + that offence, may be intelligible. But the re-enactment of such measures + in so-called civilised days is an everlasting discredit to those who + advocate it, and a disgrace to the community which permits it. This was + pointed out at the time by a large body of social reformers, and will no + doubt be realised at leisure by the persons concerned in the agitation. + </p> + <p> + Apart altogether from its barbarity, the lash is peculiarly unsuited for + use in the White Slave trade, because it will never descend on the back of + the real trader. The whip has no terrors for those engaged in illegitimate + financial transactions, for in such transactions the principal can always + afford to arrange that it shall fall on a subordinate who finds it worth + while to run the risks. This method has long been practised by those who + exploit prostitution for profit. To increase the risks merely means that + the subordinate must be more heavily paid. That means that the whole + business must be carried on more actively to cover the increased risks and + expenses. It is a very ancient fact that moral legislation increases the + evil it is designed to combat.[6] + </p> + <p> + It is necessary to point out some of the unhappy features of this + agitation, not in order to minimise the evils it was directed against, nor + to insinuate that they cannot be lessened, but as a warning against the + reaction which follows such ill-considered efforts. The fiery zealot in a + fury of blind rage strikes wildly at the evil he has just discovered, and + then flings down his weapon, glad to forget all about his momentary rage + and the errors it led him into. It is not so that ancient evils are + destroyed, evils, it must be remembered, that derive their vitality in + part from human nature and in part from the structure of our society. By + ensuring that our workers, and especially our women workers, are decently + paid, so that they can live comfortably on their wages, we shall not + indeed have abolished prostitution, which is more than an economic + phenomenon,[7] but we shall more effectually check the White Slave trader + than by the most draconic legislation the most imaginative Vice-Crusader + ever devised. And when we ensure that these same workers have ample time + and opportunity for free and joyous recreation, we shall have done more to + kill the fascination of the White Slave Traffic than by endless police + regulations for the moral supervision of the young. + </p> + <p> + No doubt the element of human nature in the manifestations we are + concerned with will still be at work, an obscure instinct often acting + differently in each sex, but tending to drive both into the same risks. + Here we need even more fundamental social changes. It is sheer foolishness + to suppose that when we raise our little dams in the path of a great + stream of human impulse that stream will forthwith flow calmly back to its + source. We must make our new channels concurrently with our dams. If we + wish to influence prostitution we must re-make our marriage laws and + modify our whole conception of the sexual relationships. In the meanwhile, + we can at least begin to-day a task of education which must slowly though + surely undermine the White Slave trader's stronghold. Such an education + needs to be not merely instruction in the facts of sex and wise guidance + concerning all the dangers and risks of the sexual life; it must also + involve a training of the will, a development of the sense of + responsibility, such as can never be secured by shutting our young people + up in a hot-house, sheltered from every fortifying breath of the outside + world. Certainly there are many among us—and precisely the most + hopeless persons from our present point of view—who can never grow + into really responsible persons.[8] Neither should they ever have been + born. It is our business to see that they are not born; and that, if they + are, they are at least placed under due social guardianship, so that we + may not be tempted to make laws for society in general which are only + needed by this feeble and infirm folk. Thus it is that when we seek to + deal with the White Slave Trader and his victims and his patrons we have + to realise that they are all very much, as we have made them, moulded by + their parents before birth, nourished on their mothers' knees. The task of + making them over again next time, and making them better, is a + revolutionary task, but it begins at home, and there is no home in which + some part of the task cannot be carried out. + </p> + <p> + It is possible that at some period in the world's history, not only will + the White Slave Traffic disappear, but even prostitution itself, and it is + for us to work towards that day. But we may be quite sure that the social + state which sees the last of the "social evil" will be a social state very + unlike ours. + </p> + <p> + [1] The nature of prostitution and of the White Slave Traffic and their + relation to each other may clearly be studied in such valuable first-hand + investigations of the subject as <i>The Social Evil: With Special + Reference to Conditions Existing in the City of New York</i>, 2nd edition, + edited by E.R.A. Seligman, Putnam's, 1912; <i>Commercialised Prostitution + in New York City</i>, by G.J. Kneeland, New York Century Co., 1913; <i>Prostitution + in Europe</i>, by Abraham Flexner, New York Century Co., 1914; <i>The + Social Evil in Chicago</i>, by the Vice-Commission of Chicago, 1911. As + regards prostitution in England and its causes I should like to call + attention to an admirable little book, <i>Downward Paths</i>, published by + Bell & Sons, 1916. The literature of the subject is, however, + extensive, and a useful bibliography will be found in the first-named + volume. + </p> + <p> + [2] This is especially true of many regions in America, both North and + South, where a hideous mixture of disparate nationalities furnishes + conditions peculiarly favourable to the "White Slave Traffic," when + prosperity increases. See, for instance, the well-informed and temperately + written book by Miss Jane Addams, <i>A New Conscience and an Ancient Evil</i>, + 1912. + </p> + <p> + [3] See Havelock Ellis: <i>Sex in Relation to Society (Studies in the + Psychology of Sex)</i>, Vol. VI., Ch. VII. + </p> + <p> + [4] "The White Slave Traffic," <i>English Review</i>, June, 1913. It is + just just the same in America. Mr. Brand-Whitlock, when Mayor of Toledo, + thoroughly investigated a sensational story of this kind brought to him in + great detail by a social worker and found that it possessed not the + slightest basis of truth. "It was," he remarks in an able paper on "The + White Slave" (<i>Forum</i>, Feb., 1914), "simply another variant of the + story that had gone the rounds of the continents, a story which had been + somehow psychologically timed to meet the hysteria which the pulpit, the + Press, and the legislature had displayed." + </p> + <p> + [5] G.F. Collas, <i>Geschichte des Flagellantismus</i>, 1913, Vol. I., p. + 16. + </p> + <p> + [6] I have brought together some of the evidence on this point in the + chapter on "Immorality and the Law" in my book, <i>The Task of Social + Hygiene</i>. + </p> + <p> + [7] The idea is cherished by many, especially among socialists, that + prostitution is mainly an economic question, and that to raise wages is to + dry up the stream of prostitution. That is certainly a fallacy, + unsupported by careful investigators, though all are agreed that the + economic condition of the wage-earner is one factor in the problem. Thus + Commissioner Adelaide Cox, at the head of the Women's Social Wing of the + Salvation Army, speaking from a very long and extensive acquaintance with + prostitutes, while not denying that women are often "wickedly underpaid," + finds that the cause of prostitution is "essentially a moral one, and + cannot be successfully fought by other than moral weapons."—(<i>Westminster + Gazette</i>, Dec. 2nd, 1912). In a yet wider sense, it may be said that + the question of the causes of prostitution is essentially social. + </p> + <p> + [8] This is a very important clue indeed in dealing with the problem of + prostitution. "It is the weak-minded, unintelligent girl," Goddard states + in his valuable work on <i>Feeblemindedness</i>, "who makes the White + Slave Traffic possible." Dr. Hickson found that over 85 per cent. of the + women brought before the Morals Court in Chicago were distinctly + feeble-minded, and Dr. Olga Bridgeman states that among the girls + committed for sexual delinquency to the Training School of Geneva, + Illinois, 97 per cent. were feeble-minded by the Binet tests, and to be + regarded as "helpless victims." (Walter Clarke, <i>Social Hygiene</i>, + June, 1915, and <i>Journal of Mental Science</i>, Jan., 1916, p. 222.) + There are fallacies in these figures, but it would appear that about half + of the prostitutes in institutions are to be regarded as mentally + defective. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0011" id="link2H_4_0011"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + XI — THE CONQUEST OF VENEREAL DISEASE + </h2> + <p> + The final Report of the Royal Commission on Venereal Diseases has brought + to an end an important and laborious investigation at what many may regard + as an unfavourable moment. Perhaps, however, the moment is not so + unfavourable as it seems. There is no period when venereal diseases + flourish so exuberantly as in war time, and we shall have a sad harvest to + gather here when the War is over.[1] Moreover, the War is teaching us to + face the real facts of life more frankly and more courageously than ever + before, and there is no field, scarcely even a battlefield, where a + training in frankness and courage is so necessary as in this of Venereal + Disease. It is difficult even to say that there is any larger field, for + it has been found possible to doubt whether the great War of to-day, when + all is summed up, will have produced more death, disease, and misery than + is produced in the ordinary course of events, during a single generation, + by venereal disease. + </p> + <p> + There are, as every man and woman ought to know, two main and quite + distinct diseases (any other being unimportant) poetically termed + "Venereal" because chiefly, though not by any means only, propagated in + the intercourse over which the Roman goddess Venus once presided. These + two diseases are syphilis and gonorrhoea. Both these diseases are very + serious, often terrible, in their effects on the individual attacked, and + both liable to be poisonous to the race. There has long been a popular + notion that, while syphilis is indeed an awful disease, gonorrhoea may be + accepted with a light heart. That, we now know, is a grave mistake. + Gonorrhoea may seem trivial at the outset, but its results, especially for + a woman and her children (when it allows her to have any), are anything + but trivial; while its greater frequency, and the indifference with which + it is regarded, still further increase its dangers. + </p> + <p> + About the serious nature of syphilis there is no doubt. It is a + comparatively modern disease, not clearly known in Europe before the + discovery of America at the end of the fifteenth century, and by some + authorities[2] to-day supposed to have been imported from America. But it + soon ravaged the whole of our world, and has continued to do so ever + since. During recent years it has perhaps shown a slight tendency to + decrease, though nothing to what could be achieved by systematic methods; + but its evils are still sufficiently alarming. Exactly how common it is + cannot be ascertained with certainty. At least 10 per cent., probably + more, of the population in our large cities have been infected by + syphilis, some before birth. In 1912 for an average strength of 120,000 + men in the English Navy, nearly 300,000 days were lost as a result of + venereal disease, while among 100,000 soldiers in the Home Army for the + same year, an average of nearly 600 men were constantly sick from the same + cause. We may estimate from this small example how vast must be the total + loss of working power due to venereal disease. Moreover, in Sir William + Osler's words, "of the killing diseases syphilis comes third or fourth." + Its prevalence varies in different regions and different social classes. + The mortality rate from syphilis for males above fifteen is highest for + unskilled labour, then for the group intermediate between unskilled and + skilled labour, then for the upper and middle class, followed by the group + intermediate between this class and skilled labour, while skilled labour, + textile workers, and miners follow, and agricultural labourers come out + most favourably of all. These differences do not represent any ascending + grade in virtue or sexual abstinence, but are dependent upon differences + in social condition; thus syphilis is comparatively rare among + agricultural labourers because they associate only with women they know + and are not exposed to the temptation of strange women, while it is high + among the upper class because they are shut out from sexual intimacy with + women of their own class and so resort to prostitutes. On the whole, + however, it will be seen, the poison of syphilis is fairly diffused among + all classes. This poison may work through many years or even the whole of + life, and its early manifestations are the least important. It may begin + before birth: thus, one recent investigation shows that in 150 syphilitic + families there were only 390 seemingly healthy children to 401 infant + deaths, stillbirths, and miscarriages (as against 172 in 180 healthy + families), the great majority of these failures being infant deaths and + thus representing a large amount of wasted energy and expense.[3] Syphilis + is, again, the most serious single cause of the most severe forms of brain + disease and insanity, this often coming on many years after the infection, + and when the early symptoms were but slight. Blindness and deafness from + the beginning of life are in a large proportion of cases due to syphilis. + There is, indeed, no organ of the body which is not liable to break down, + often with fatal results, through syphilis, so that it has been well said + that a doctor who knows syphilis thoroughly is familiar with every branch + of his profession. + </p> + <p> + Gonorrhoea is a still commoner disease than syphilis; how common it is + very difficult to say. It is also an older disease, for the ancient + Egyptians knew it, and the Biblical King Esarhaddon of Assyria, as the + records of his court show, once caught it. It seems to some people no more + serious than a common cold, yet it is able to inflict much prolonged + misery on its victims, while on the race its influence in the long run is + even more deadly than that of syphilis, for gonorrhoea is the chief cause + of sterility in women, that is to say, in from 30 to 50 per cent. of such + cases, while of cases of sterility in men (which form a quarter to a third + of the whole) gonorrhoea is the cause in from 70 to 90 per cent. The + inflammation of the eyes of the new-born leading to blindness is also in + 70 per cent. cases due to gonorrhoea in the mother, and this occurs in + over six per 1,000 births. + </p> + <p> + Three years ago a Royal Commission was appointed to investigate the best + methods of controlling venereal disease, as small-pox, typhus, and to a + large extent typhoid, have already been controlled. The Commission was + well composed, not merely of officials and doctors, but of experienced men + and women in various fields, and the final Report is signed by all the + members, any difference of opinion being confined to minor points (which + it is unnecessary to touch on here) and to two members only. The + recommendations are conceived in the most practical and broad-minded + spirit. They are neither faddy nor goody-goody. Some indeed may wish that + they had gone further. The Commission leave over for later consideration + the question of notifying venereal disease as other infectious diseases + are notified, and there is no recommendation for the provision of + preventive methods against infection for use before intercourse, such as + are officially favoured in Germany. But at both these points the + Commissioners have been wise, for they are points to which sections of + public opinion are still strongly hostile.[4] As they stand, the + recommendations should carry conviction to all serious and reasonable + persons. Already, indeed, the Government, without opposition, has + expressed its willingness to undertake the financial burden which the + Commission would impose on it. + </p> + <p> + The main Recommendations made by the Commission, if we put aside the + suggestions for obtaining a more exact statistical knowledge, may be + placed under the heads of Treatment and Prevention. As regards the first, + it is insisted that measures should be taken to render the best modern + treatment, which should be free to all, readily available for the whole + community, in such a way that those affected will have no hesitation in + taking advantage of the facilities thus offered. The means of treatment + should be organised by County Councils and Boroughs, under the Local + Government Board, which should have power to make independent arrangements + when the local authorities fail in their duties. Institutional treatment + should be provided at all general hospitals, special arrangements made for + the treatment of out-patients in the evenings, and no objection offered to + patients seeking treatment outside their own neighbourhoods. The + expenditure should be assisted by grants from Imperial Funds to the extent + of 75 per cent. It may be added that, however heavy such expenditure may + be, an economy can scarcely fail to be effected. The financial cost of + venereal disease to-day is so vast as to be beyond calculation. It enters + into every field of life. It is enough merely to consider the significant + little fact that the cost of educating a deaf child is ten times as great + as that of educating an ordinary child. + </p> + <p> + Under the head of Prevention we may place such a suggestion as that the + existence of infective venereal disease should constitute legal incapacity + for marriage, even when unknown, and be a sufficient cause for annulling + the marriage at the discretion of the court. But by far the chief + importance under this head is assigned by the Commission to education and + instruction. We see here the vindication of those who for years have been + teaching that the first essential in dealing with venereal disease is + popular enlightenment. There must be more careful instruction—"through + all types and grades of education"—on the sexual relations in regard + to conduct, while further instruction should be provided in evening + continuation schools, as well as factories and works, with the aid of + properly constituted voluntary associations. + </p> + <p> + These are sound and practical recommendations which, as the Government has + realised, can be put in action at once. A few years ago any attempt to + control venereal disease was considered by many to be almost impious. Such + disease was held to be the just visitation of God upon sin and to + interfere would be wicked. We know better now. A large proportion of those + who are most severely struck by venereal disease are new-born children and + trustful wives, while a simple kiss or the use of towels and cups in + common has constantly served to spread venereal disease in a family. Even + when we turn to the commonest method of infection, we have still to + remember that we are dealing largely with inexperienced youths, with + loving and trustful girls, who have yielded to the deepest and most + volcanic impulse of their natures, and have not yet learnt that that + impulse is a thing to be held sacred for their own sakes and the sake of + the race. In so far as there is sin, it is sin which must be shared by + those who have failed to train and enlighten the young. A Pharisaic + attitude is not only highly mischievous in its results, but is here + altogether out of place. Much harm has been done in the past by the action + of Benefit Societies in withholding recognition and treatment from + venereal disease. + </p> + <p> + It is evident that this thought was at the back of the minds of those who + framed these wise recommendations. We cannot expect to do away all at once + with the feeling that venereal disease is "shameful." It may not even be + desirable. But we can at least make clear that, in so far as there is any + shame, it must be a question between the individual and his own + conscience. From the point of view of science, syphilis and gonorrhoea are + just diseases, like cancer and consumption, the only diseases with which + they can be compared in the magnitude and extent of their results, and + therefore it is best to speak of them by their scientific names, instead + of trying to invent vague and awkward circumlocutions. From the point of + view of society, any attitude of shame is unfortunate, because it is + absolutely essential that these diseases should be met in the open and + grappled with methodically and thoroughly. Otherwise, as the Commission + recognises, the sufferer is apt to become the prey of ignorant quacks + whose inefficient treatment is largely responsible for the development of + the latest and worst afflictions these diseases produce when not + effectually nipped in the bud. That they can be thus cut short—far + more easily than consumption, to say nothing of cancer—is the fact + which makes it possible to hope for a conquest over venereal disease. It + is a conquest that would make the whole world more beautiful and deliver + love from its ugliest shadow. But the victory cannot be won by science + alone, not even in alliance with officialdom. It can only be won through + the enlightened co-operation of the whole nation. + </p> + <p> + [1] The increase of venereal disease during the Great War has been noted + alike in Germany, France, and England. Thus, as regards France, Gaucher + has stated at the Paris Academy of Medicine (<i>Journal de Medicine</i>, + May 10th, 1916) that since mobilisation syphilis had increased by nearly + one half, alike among soldiers and civilians; it had much increased in + quite young people and in elderly men. In Germany, Neisser, a leading + authority, states (<i>Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift</i>, 14th Jan., + 1915) that the prevalence of venereal disease is much greater than in the + war of 1870, and that "every day many thousands, not to say tens of + thousands, of otherwise able-bodied men are withdrawn from the service on + this account." + </p> + <p> + [2] The chief is Iwan Bloch who, in his elaborate work, <i>Der Ursprung + der Syphilis</i> (2 vols., 1901, 1911), has fully investigated the + evidence. + </p> + <p> + [3] N. Bishop Harman, "The Influence of Syphilis on the Chances of + Progeny," <i>British Medical Journal</i>, Feb. 5th, 1916. + </p> + <p> + [4] It is true that in my book, <i>Sex in Relation to Society</i> (Ch. + VIII.) I have stated my belief that notification, as in the case of other + serious infectious diseases, is the first step in the conquest of venereal + disease. I still think it ought to be so. But a yet more preliminary step + is popular enlightenment as to the need for such notification. The + recommendations seem to me to go as far as it is possible to go at the + moment in English-speaking countries without producing friction and + opposition. In so far as they are carried out the recommendations will + ensure the necessary popular enlightenment. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0012" id="link2H_4_0012"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + XII — THE NATIONALISATION OF HEALTH + </h2> + <p> + It was inevitable that we should some day have to face the problem of + medical reorganisation on a social basis. Along many lines social progress + has led to the initiation of movements for the improvement of public + health. But they are still incomplete and imperfectly co-ordinated. We + have never realised that the great questions of health cannot safely be + left to municipal tinkering and the patronage of Bumbledom. The result is + chaos and a terrible waste, not only of what we call "hard cash," but also + of sensitive flesh and blood. Health, there cannot be the slightest doubt, + is a vastly more fundamental and important matter than education, to say + nothing of such minor matters as the post office or the telephone system. + Yet we have nationalised these before even giving a thought to the + Nationalisation of Health. + </p> + <p> + At the present day medicine is mainly in the hands, as it was two thousand + years ago, of the "private practitioner." His mental status has, indeed, + changed. To-day he is submitted to a long and arduous training in + magnificently equipped institutions; all the laboriously acquired + processes and results of modern medicine and hygiene are brought within + the student's reach. And when he leaves the hospital, often with the + largest and noblest conception of the physician's place in life, what do + we do with him? He becomes a "private practitioner," which means, as + Duclaux, the late distinguished Director of the Pasteur Institute, put it, + that we place him on the level of a retail grocer who must patiently stand + behind his counter (without the privilege of advertising himself) until + the public are pleased to come and buy advice or drugs which are usually + applied for too late to be of much use, and may be thrown away at the + buyer's good pleasure, without the possibility of any protest by the + seller. It is little wonder that in many cases the doctor's work and aims + suffer under such conditions; his nature is subdued to what it works in; + he clings convulsively to his counter and its retail methods. + </p> + <p> + The fact is—and it is a fact that is slowly becoming apparent to all—that + the private practice of medicine is out of date. It fails to answer the + needs of our time. There are various reasons why this should be the case, + but two are fundamental. In the first place, medicine has outgrown the + capacity of any individual doctor; the only adequate private practitioner + must have a sound general knowledge of medicine with an expert knowledge + of a dozen specialties; that is to say, he must give place to a staff of + doctors acting co-ordinately, for the present system, or lack of system, + by which a patient wanders at random from private practitioner to + specialist, from specialist to specialist <i>ad infinitum</i>, is + altogether mischievous. Moreover, not only is it impossible for the + private practitioner to possess the knowledge required to treat his + patients adequately: he cannot possess the scientific mechanical equipment + nowadays required alike for diagnosis and treatment, and every day + becoming more elaborate, more expensive, more difficult to manipulate. It + is installed in our great hospitals for the benefit of the poorest + patient; it could, perhaps, be set up in a millionaire's palace, but it is + hopelessly beyond the private practitioner, though without it his work + must remain unsatisfactory and inadequate.[1] In the second place, the + whole direction of modern medicine is being changed and to an end away + from private practice; our thoughts are not now mainly bent on the cure of + disease but on its prevention. Medicine is becoming more and more + transformed into hygiene, and in this transformation, though the tasks + presented are larger and more systematic, they are also easier and more + economical. These two fundamental tendencies of modern medicine—greater + complexity of its methods and the predominantly preventive character of + its aims—alone suffice to render the position of the private + practitioner untenable. He cannot cope with the complexity of modern + medicine; he has no authority to enforce its hygiene. + </p> + <p> + The medical system of the future must be a national system co-ordinating + all the conditions of health. At the centre we should expect to find a + Minister of Health, and every doctor of the State would give his whole + time to his work and be paid by salary which in the case of the higher + posts would be equal to that now fixed for the higher legal offices, for + the chief doctor in the State ought to be at least as important an + official as the Lord Chancellor. Hospitals and infirmaries would be alike + nationalised, and, in place of the present antagonism between hospitals + and the bulk of the medical profession, every doctor would be in touch + with a hospital, thus having behind him a fully equipped and staffed + institution for all purposes of diagnosis, consultation, treatment, and + research, also serving for a centre of notification, registration, + preventive and hygienic measures. In every district the citizen would have + a certain amount of choice as regards the medical man to whom he may go + for advice, but no one would be allowed to escape the medical supervision + and registration of his district, for it is essential that the central + Health Authority of every district should know the health conditions of + all the inhabitants of the district. Only by some such organised and + co-ordinated system as this can the primary conditions of Health, and + preventive measures against disease, be genuinely socialised. + </p> + <p> + These views were put forward by the present writer twenty years ago in a + little book on <i>The Nationalisation of Health</i>, which, though it met + with wide approval, was probably regarded by most people as Utopian. Since + then the times have moved, a new generation has sprung up, and ideas + which, twenty years ago, were brooded over by isolated thinkers are now + seen to be in the direct line of progress; they have become the property + of parties and matters of active propaganda. Even before the introduction + of State Insurance Professor Benjamin Moore, in his able book, <i>The Dawn + of the Health Age</i>, anticipating the actual march of events, formulated + a State Insurance Scheme which would lead on, as he pointed out, to a + genuinely National Medical Service, and later, Dr. Macilwaine, in a little + book entitled <i>Medical Revolution</i>, again advocated the same changes: + the establishment of a Ministry of Health, a medical service on a + preventive basis, and the reform of the hospitals which must constitute + the nucleus of such a service. It may be said that for medical men no + longer engaged in private practice it is easy to view the disappearance of + private practice with serenity; but it must be added that it is precisely + that disinterested serenity which makes possible also a clear insight into + the problems and a wider view of the new horizons of medicine. Thus it is + that to-day the dreamers of yesterday are justified. + </p> + <p> + The great scheme of State Insurance was certainly an important step + towards the socialisation of medicine. It came short, indeed, of the + complete Nationalisation of Health as an affair of State. But that could + not possibly be introduced at one move. Apart even from the difficulty of + complete reorganisation, the two great vested interests of private medical + practice on the one hand and Friendly Societies on the other would stand + in the way. A complicated transitional period is necessary, during which + those two interests are conciliated and gradually absorbed. It is this + transitional period which State Insurance has inaugurated. To compare + small things to great—as we may, for the same laws run all through + Nature and Society—this scheme corresponds to the ancient Ptolomaean + system of astronomy, with its painfully elaborate epicycles, which + preceded and led on to the sublime simplicity of the Copernican system. We + need not anticipate that the transitional stage of national insurance will + endure as long as the ancient astronomy. Professor Moore estimated that it + would lead to a completely national medical service in twenty-five years, + and since the introduction of that method he has, too optimistically, + reduced the period to ten years. We cannot reach simplicity at a bound; we + must first attempt to systematise the recognised and established + activities and adjust them harmoniously. + </p> + <p> + The organised refusal of the medical profession at the outset to carry on, + under the conditions offered, the part assigned to it in the great + National Insurance scheme opened out prospects not clearly realised by the + organisers. No doubt its immediate aspects were unfortunate. It not only + threatened to impede the working of a very complex machine, but it + dismayed many who were not prepared to see doctors apparently taking up + the position of the syndicalists, and arguing that a profession which is + essential to the national welfare need not be carried out on national + lines, but can be run exclusively by itself in its own interests. Such an + attitude, however, usefully served to make clear how necessary it is + becoming that the extension of medicine and hygiene in the national life + should be accompanied by a corresponding extension in the national + government. If we had had a Council of National Health, as well as of + National Defence, or a Board of Health as well as a Board of Trade, a + Minister of Health with a seat in the Cabinet, any scheme of Insurance + would have been framed from the outset in close consultation with the + profession which would have the duty of carrying it out. No subsequent + friction would have been possible. + </p> + <p> + Had the Insurance scheme been so framed, it is perhaps doubtful whether it + would have been so largely based on the old contract system. Club medical + practice has long been in discredit, alike from the point of view of + patient and doctor. It furnishes the least satisfactory form of medical + relief for the patient, less adequate than that he could obtain either as + a private patient or as a hospital patient. The doctor, on his side, + though he may find it a very welcome addition to his income, regards Club + practice as semi-charitable, and, moreover, a form of charity in which he + is often imposed on; he seldom views his club patients with much + satisfaction, and unless he is a self-sacrificing enthusiast, it is not to + them that his best attention, his best time, his most expensive drugs, are + devoted. To perpetuate and enlarge the club system of practice and to + glorify it by affixing to it a national seal of approval, was, therefore, + a somewhat risky experiment, not wisely to be attempted without careful + consultation with those most concerned. + </p> + <p> + Another point might then also have become clear: the whole tendency of + medicine is towards a recognition of the predominance of Hygiene. The + modern aim is to prevent disease. The whole national system of medicine is + being slowly though steadily built up in recognition of the great fact + that the interests of Health come before the interests of Disease. It has + been an unfortunate flaw in the magnificent scheme of Insurance that this + vital fact was not allowed for, that the old-fashioned notion that + treatment rather than prevention is the object of medicine was still + perpetuated, and that nothing was done to co-ordinate the Insurance scheme + with the existing Health Services. + </p> + <p> + It seems probable that in a Service of State medical officers the solution + may ultimately be found. Such a solution would, indeed, immensely increase + the value of the Insurance scheme, and, in the end, confer far greater + benefits than at present on the millions of people who would come under + its operation. For there can be no doubt the Club system is not only + unscientific; it is also undemocratic. It perpetuates what was originally + a semi-charitable and second-rate method of treatment of the poorer + classes. A State medical officer, devoting his whole time and attention to + his State patients, has no occasion to make invidious distinctions between + public and private patients. + </p> + <p> + A further advantage of a State Medical Service is that it will facilitate + the inevitable task of nationalising the hospitals, whether charitable or + Poor-law. The Insurance Act, as it stands, opens no definite path in this + direction. But nowadays, so vast and complicated has medicine become, even + the most skilful doctor cannot adequately treat his patient unless he has + a great hospital at his back, with a vast army of specialists and + research-workers, and a manifold instrumental instalment. + </p> + <p> + A third, and even more fundamental, advantage of a State Medical Service + is that it would help to bring Treatment into touch with Prevention. The + private practitioner, as such, inside or outside the Insurance scheme, + cannot conveniently go behind his patient's illness. But the State doctor + would be entitled to ask: <i>Why</i> has this man broken down? The State's + guardianship of the health of its citizens now begins at birth (is tending + to be carried back before birth) and covers the school life. If a man + falls ill, it is, nowadays, legitimate to inquire where the responsibility + lies. It is all very well to patch up the diseased man with drugs or what + not. But at best that is a makeshift method. The Consumptive Sanatoriums + have aroused enthusiasm, and they also are all very well. But the Charity + Organisation Society has shown that only about 50 per cent. of those who + pass through such institutions become fit for work. It is not more + treatment of disease that we want, it is less need for treatment. And a + State Medical Service is the only method by which Medicine can be brought + into close touch with Hygiene. + </p> + <p> + The present attitude of the medical profession sometimes strikes people as + narrow, unpatriotic, and merely self-interested. But the Insurance Act has + brought a powerful ferment of intellectual activity into the medical + profession which in the end will work to finer issues. A significant sign + of the times is the establishment of the State Medical Service + Association, having for its aim the organisation of the medical profession + as a State Service, the nationalisation of hospitals, and the unification + of preventive and curative medicine. To many in the medical profession + such schemes still seem "Utopian"; they are blind to a process which has + been in ever increasing action for more than half a century and which they + are themselves taking part in every day. + </p> + <p> + [1] The result sometimes is that the ambitious doctor seeks to become a + specialist in at least one subject, and instals a single expensive method + of treatment to which he enthusiastically subjects all his patients. This + would be comic if it were not sometimes rather tragic. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0013" id="link2H_4_0013"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + XIII — EUGENICS AND GENIUS + </h2> + <p> + The cry is often heard to-day from those who watch with disapproval the + efforts made to discourage the reckless procreation of the degenerate and + the unfit: You are stamping out the germs of genius! It is widely held + that genius is a kind of flower, unknown to the horticulturist, which only + springs from diseased roots; make the plant healthily sound and your hope + of blossoms is gone, you will see nothing but leaves. Or, according to the + happier metaphor of Lombroso, the work of genius is an exquisite pearl, + and pearls are the product of an obscure disease. To the medical mind, + especially, it has sometimes been, naturally and properly no doubt, a + source of satisfaction to imagine that the loveliest creations of human + intellect may perhaps be employed to shed radiance on the shelves of the + pathological museum. Thus we find eminent physicians warning us against + any effort to decrease the vigour of pathological processes, and + influential medical journals making solemn statements in the same sense. + "Already," I read in a recent able and interesting editorial article in + the <i>British Medical Journal</i>, "eugenists in their kind enthusiasm + are threatening to stamp out the germs of possible genius." + </p> + <p> + Now it is quite easy to maintain that the health, happiness, and sanity of + the whole community are more precious even than genius. It is so easy, + indeed, that if the question of eugenics were submitted to the Referendum + on this sole ground there can be little doubt what the result would be. + There are not many people, even in the most highly educated communities, + who value the possibility of a new poem, symphony, or mathematical law so + highly that they would sacrifice their own health, happiness, and sanity + to retain that possibility for their offspring. Of course we may declare + that a majority which made such a decision must be composed of very + low-minded uncultured people, altogether lacking in appreciation of + pathology, and reflecting no credit on the eugenic cause they supported; + but there can be little doubt that we should have to admit their + existence. + </p> + <p> + We need not hasten, however, to place the question on this ground. It is + first necessary to ascertain what reason there is to suppose that a regard + for eugenic considerations in mating would tend to stamp out the germs of + genius. Is there any reason at all? That is the question I am here + concerned with. + </p> + <p> + The anti-eugenic argument on this point, whenever any argument is brought + forward, consists in pointing to all sorts of men of genius and of talent + who, it is alleged, were poor citizens, physical degenerates the prey of + all manner of constitutional diseases, sometimes candidates for the + lunatic asylum which they occasionally reached. The miscellaneous data + which may thus be piled up are seldom critically sifted, and often very + questionable, for it is difficult enough to obtain any positive biological + knowledge concerning great men who died yesterday, and practically + impossible in most cases to reach an unquestionable conclusion as regards + those who died a century or more ago. Many of the most positive statements + commonly made concerning the diseases even of modern genius are without + any sure basis. The case of Nietzsche, who was seen by some of the chief + specialists of the day, is still really quite obscure. So is that of Guy + de Maupassant. Rousseau wrote the fullest and frankest account of his + ailments, and the doctors made a <i>post-mortem</i> examination. Yet + nearly all the medical experts—and they are many—who have + investigated Rousseau's case reach different conclusions. It would be easy + to multiply indefinitely the instances of great men of the past concerning + whose condition of health or disease we are in hopeless perplexity. + </p> + <p> + This fact is, however, one that, as an argument, works both ways, and the + important point is to make clear that it cannot concern us. No eugenic + considerations can annihilate the man of genius when he is once born and + bred. If eugenics is to stamp out the man of genius it must do so before + he is born, by acting on his parents. + </p> + <p> + Nor is it possible to assume that if the man of genius, apart from his + genius, is an unfit person to procreate the race, therefore his parents, + not possessing any genius, were likewise unfit to propagate. It is easy to + find persons of high ability who in other respects are unfit for the ends + of life, ill-balanced in mental or physical development, neurasthenic, + valetudinarian, the victims in varying degrees of all sorts of diseases. + Yet their parents, without any high ability, were, to all appearance, + robust, healthy, hard-working, commonplace people who would easily pass + any ordinary eugenic tests. We know nothing as to the action of two + seemingly ordinary persons on each other in constituting heredity, how + hypertrophied intellectual aptitude comes about, what accidents, normal or + pathological, may occur to the germ before birth, nor even how strenuous + intellectual activity may affect the organism generally. We cannot argue + that since these persons, apart from their genius, were not seemingly the + best people to carry on the race, therefore a like judgment should be + passed on their parents and the germs of genius thus be stamped out. + </p> + <p> + We only arrive at the crucial question when we ask: Have the characters of + the parents of men of genius been of such an obviously unfavourable kind + that eugenically they would nowadays be dissuaded from propagation, or + under a severe <i>régime</i> of compulsory certificates (the desirability + of which I am far indeed from assuming) be forbidden to marry? Have the + parents of genius belonged to the "unfit"? That is a question which must + be answered in the affirmative if this objection to eugenics has any + weight. Yet so far as I know, none of those who have brought forward the + objection have supported it by any evidence of the kind whatever. Thirty + years ago Dr. Maudsley dogmatically wrote: "There is hardly ever a man of + genius who has not insanity or nervous disorder of some form in his + family." But he never brought forward any evidence in support of that + pronouncement. Nor has anyone else, if we put aside the efforts of more or + less competent writers—like Lombroso in his <i>Man of Genius</i> and + Nisbet in his <i>Insanity of Genius</i>—to rake in statements from + all quarters regarding the morbidities of genius, often without any + attempt to authenticate, criticise, or sift them, and never with any + effort to place them in due perspective.[1] + </p> + <p> + It so happens that, some years ago, with no relation to eugenic + considerations, I devoted a considerable amount of attention to the + biological characters of British men of genius, considered, so far as + possible, on an objective and impartial basis.[2] The selection, that is + to say, was made, so far as possible, without regard to personal + predilections, in accordance with certain rules, from the <i>Dictionary of + National Biography</i>. In this way one thousand and thirty names were + obtained of men and women who represent the flower of British genius + during historical times, only excluding those persons who were alive at + the end of the last century. What proportion of these were the offspring + of parents who were insane or mentally defective to a serious extent? + </p> + <p> + If the view of Maudsley—that there is "hardly ever" a man of genius + who is not the product of an insane or nervously-disordered stock—had + a basis of truth, we should expect that in one or other parents of the man + of genius actual insanity had occurred in a very large proportion of + cases; 25 per cent. would be a moderate estimate. But what do we find? In + not 1 per cent. can definite insanity be traced among the parents of + British men and women of genius. No doubt this result is below the truth; + the insanity of the parents must sometimes have escaped the biographer's + notice. But even if we double the percentage to escape this source of + error, the proportion still remains insignificant. + </p> + <p> + There is more to be said. If the insanity of the parent occurred early in + life, we should expect it to attract attention more easily than if it + occurred late in life. Those parents of men of genius falling into + insanity late in life, the critic may argue, escape notice. But it is + precisely to this group to which all the ascertainably insane parents of + British men of genius belong. There is not a single recorded instance, so + far as I have been able to ascertain, in which the parent had been + definitely and recognisably insane before the birth of the distinguished + child; so that any prohibition of the marriage of persons who had + previously been insane would have left British genius untouched. In all + cases the insanity came on late in life, and it was usually, without + doubt, of the kind known as senile dementia. This was so in the case of + the mother of Bacon, the most distinguished person in the list of those + with an insane parent. Charles Lamb's father, we are told, eventually + became "imbecile." Turner's mother became insane. The same is recorded of + Archbishop Tillotson's mother and of Archbishop Leighton's father. This + brief list includes all the parents of British men of genius who are + recorded (and not then always very definitely) as having finally died + insane. In the description given of others of the parents of our men of + genius it is not, however, difficult to detect that, though they were not + recognised as insane, their mental condition was so highly abnormal as to + be not far removed from insanity. This was the case with Gray's father and + with the mothers of Arthur Young and Andrew Bell. Even when we allow for + all the doubtful cases, the proportion of persons of genius with an insane + parent remains very low, less than 2 per cent. + </p> + <p> + Senile dementia, though it is one of the least important and significant + of the forms of insanity, and is entirely compatible with a long and + useful life, must not, however, be regarded, when present in a marked + degree, as the mere result of old age. Entirely normal people of sound + heredity do not tend to manifest signs of pronounced mental weakness or + abnormality even in extreme old age. We are justified in suspecting a + neurotic strain, though it may not be of severe degree. This is, indeed, + illustrated by our records of British genius. Some of the eminent men of + genius on my list (at least twelve) suffered before death from insanity + which may probably be described as senile dementia. But several of these + were somewhat abnormal during earlier life (like Swift) or had a child who + became insane (like Bishop Marsh). In these and in other cases there has + doubtless been some hereditary neurotic strain. + </p> + <p> + It is clearly, however, not due to any intensity of this strain that we + find the incidence of insanity in men of genius, as illustrated, for + example, by senile dementia, so much more marked than its incidence on + their parents. There is another factor to be invoked here: convergent + morbid heredity. If a man and a woman, each with a slight tendency to + nervous abnormality, marry each other, there is a much greater chance of + the offspring manifesting a severe degree of nervous abnormality than if + they had married entirely sound partners. Now both among normal and + abnormal people there is a tendency for like to mate with like. The + attraction of the unlike for each other, which was once supposed to + prevail, is not predominant, except within the sphere of the secondary + sexual characters, where it clearly prevails, so that the ultra-masculine + man is attracted to the ultra-feminine woman, and the feminine man to the + boyish or mannish woman. Apart from this, people tend to marry those who + are both psychically and physically of the same type as themselves. It + thus happens that nervously abnormal people become mated to the nervously + abnormal. This is well illustrated by the British men of genius + themselves. Although insanity is more prevalent among them than among + their parents, the same can scarcely be said of them in regard to their + wives. It is notable that the insane wives of these men of genius are + almost as numerous as the insane men of genius, though it rarely happens + (as in the case of Southey) that both husband and wife go out of their + minds. But in all these cases there has probably been a mutual attraction + of mentally abnormal people. + </p> + <p> + It is to this tendency in the parents of men of genius, leading to a + convergent heredity, that we must probably attribute the undue tendency of + the men of genius themselves to manifest insanity. Each of the parents + separately may have displayed but a minor degree of neuropathic + abnormality, but the two strains were fortified by union and the tendency + to insanity became more manifest. This was, for instance, the case as + regards Charles Lamb. The nervous abnormality of the parents in this case + was less profound than that of the children, but it was present in both. + Under such circumstances what is called the law of anticipation comes into + play; the neurotic tendency of the parents, increased by union, is also + antedated, so that definite insanity occurs earlier in the life of the + child than, if it had appeared at all, it occurred in the life of the + parent. Lamb's father only became weak-minded in old age, but since the + mother also had a mentally abnormal strain, Lamb himself had an attack of + insanity early in life, and his sister was liable to recurrent insanity + during a great part of her life. Notwithstanding, however, the influence + of this convergent heredity, it is found that the total insanity of + British men and women of genius is not more, so far as can be ascertained—even + when slight and dubious cases are included—than 4.2 per cent. That + ascertainable proportion must be somewhat below the real proportion, but + in any case it scarcely suggests that insanity is an essential factor of + genius. + </p> + <p> + Let us, however, go beyond the limits of British genius, and consider the + evidence more freely. There is, for instance, Tasso, who was undoubtedly + insane for a good part of his life, and has been much studied by the + pathologists. De-Gaudenzi, who has written one of the best + psychopathological studies of Tasso, shows clearly that his father, + Bernardo, was a man of high intelligence, of great emotional sensibility, + with a tendency to melancholy as well as a mystical idealism, of somewhat + weak character, and prone to invoke Divine aid in the slightest + difficulty. It was a temperament that might be considered a little morbid, + outside a monastery, but it was not insane, nor is there any known + insanity among his near relations. This man's wife, Porzia, Tasso's + mother, arouses the enthusiasm of all who ever mention her, as a creature + of angelic perfection. No insanity here either, but something of the same + undue sensitiveness and melancholy as in the father, the same absence of + the coarser and more robust virtues. Moreover, she belonged to a family by + no means so angelic as herself, not insane, but abnormal—malevolent, + cruel, avaricious, almost criminal. The most scrupulous modern alienist + would hesitate to deprive either Bernardo or Porzia of the right to + parenthood. Yet, as we know, the son born of this union was not only a + world-famous poet, but an exceedingly unhappy, abnormal, and insane man. + </p> + <p> + Let us take the case of another still greater and more famous man, + Rousseau. It cannot reasonably be doubted that, at some moments in his + life at all events, and perhaps during a considerable period, Rousseau was + definitely insane. We are intimately acquainted with the details of the + life and character of his relations and of his ancestry. We not only + possess the full account he set forth at the beginning of his <i>Confessions</i>, + but we know very much more than Rousseau knew. Geneva was paternal—paternal + in the most severe sense—in scrutinising every unusual act of its + children, and castigating every slightest deviation from the straight + path. The whole life of the citizens of old Geneva may be read in Genevan + archives, and not a scrap of information concerning the conduct of + Rousseau's ancestors and relatives as set down in these archives but has + been brought to the light of day. If there is any great man of genius whom + the activities of these fanatical eugenists would have rendered + impossible, it must surely have been Rousseau. Let us briefly examine his + parentage. Rousseau's father was the outcome of a fine stock which for two + generations had been losing something of its fine qualities, though + without sinking anywhere near insanity, criminality, or pauperism. The + Rousseaus still exercised their craft with success; they were on the whole + esteemed; Jean-Jacques's father was generally liked, but he was somewhat + unstable, romantic, with no strong sense of duty, hot-tempered, easily + taking offence. The mother, from a modern standpoint, was an attractive, + highly accomplished, and admirable woman. In her neighbours' eyes she was + not quite Puritanical enough, high-spirited, independent, adventurous, + fond of innocent gaiety, but a devoted wife when, at last, at the age of + thirty, she married. More than once before marriage she was formally + censured by the ecclesiastical authorities for her little + insubordinations, and these may be seen to have a certain significance + when we turn to her father; he was a thorough <i>mauvais sujet</i>, with + an incorrigible love of pleasure, and constantly falling into + well-deserved trouble for some escapade with the young women of Geneva. + Thus on both sides there was a certain nervous instability, an + uncontrollable wayward emotionality. But of actual insanity, of nervous + disorder, of any decided abnormality or downright unfitness in either + father or mother, not a sign. Isaac Rousseau and Susanne Bernard would + have been passed by the most ferocious eugenist. It is again a case in + which the chances of convergent heredity have produced a result which in + its magnitude, in its heights and in its depths, none could foresee. It is + one of the most famous and most accurately known examples of insane genius + in history, and we see what amount of support it offers to the ponderous + dictum concerning the insane heredity of genius. + </p> + <p> + Let us turn from insanity to grave nervous disease. Epilepsy at once comes + before us, all the more significantly since it has been considered, more + especially by Lombroso, to be the special disease through which genius + peculiarly manifests itself. It is true that much importance here is + attached to those minor forms of epilepsy which involve no gross and + obvious convulsive fit. The existence of these minor attacks is, in the + case of men of genius, usually difficult to disprove and equally difficult + to prove. It certainly should not be so as regards the major form of + epilepsy. Yet among the thousand and thirty persons of British genius I + was only able to find epilepsy mentioned twice, and in both cases + incorrectly, for the National Biographer had attributed it to Lord Herbert + of Cherbury through misreading a passage in Herbert's <i>Autobiography</i>, + while the epileptic fits of Sir W.R. Hamilton in old age were most + certainly not true epilepsy. Without doubt, no eugenist could recommend an + epileptic to become a parent. But if epilepsy has no existence in British + men of genius it is improbable that it has often occurred among their + parents. The loss to British genius through eugenic activity in this + sphere would probably, therefore, have been <i>nil</i>. + </p> + <p> + Putting aside British genius, however, one finds that it has been almost a + commonplace of alienists and neurologists, even up to the present day, to + present glibly a formidable list of mighty men of genius as victims of + epilepsy. Thus I find a well-known American alienist lately making the + unqualified and positive statement that "Mahomet, Napoleon, Moličre, + Handel, Paganini, Mozart, Schiller, Richelieu, Newton and Flaubert" were + epileptics, while still more recently a distinguished English neurologist, + declaring that "the world's history has been made by men who were either + epileptics, insane, or of neuropathic stock," brings forward a similar and + still larger list to illustrate that statement, with Alexander the Great, + Julius Caesar, the Apostle Paul, Luther, Frederick the Great and many + others thrown in, though unfortunately he fails to tell us which members + of the group he desires us to regard as epileptic. Julius Caesar was + certainly one of them, but the statement of Suetonius (not an + unimpeachable authority in any case) that Caesar had epileptic fits + towards the close of his life is disproof rather than proof of true + epilepsy. Of Mahomet, and St. Paul also, epilepsy is alleged. As regards + the first, the most competent authorities regard the convulsive seizures + attributed to the Prophet as perhaps merely a legendary attempt to + increase the awe he inspired by unmistakable evidence of divine authority. + The narrative of St. Paul's experience on the road to Damascus is very + unsatisfactory evidence on which to base a medical diagnosis, and it may + be mentioned that, in the course of a discussion in the columns of the <i>British + Medical Journal</i> during 1910, as many as six different views were put + forward as to the nature of the Apostle's "thorn in the flesh." The + evidence on which Richelieu, who was undoubtedly a man of very fragile + constitution is declared to be epileptic, is of the very slenderest + character. For the statement that Newton was epileptic there is absolutely + no reliable evidence at all, and I am quite ignorant of the grounds on + which Mozart, Handel and Schiller are declared epileptics. The evidence + for epilepsy in Napoleon may seem to carry slightly more weight, for there + is that in the moral character of Napoleon which we might very well + associate with the epileptic temperament. It seems clear that Napoleon + really had at times convulsive seizures which were at least epileptoid. + Thus Talleyrand describes how one day, just after dinner (it may be + recalled that Napoleon was a copious and exceedingly rapid eater), passing + for a few minutes into Josephine's room, the Emperor came out, took + Talleyrand into his own room, ordered the door to be closed, and then fell + down in a fit. Bourrienne, however, who was Napoleon's private secretary + for eleven years, knew nothing about any fits. It is not usual, in a true + epileptic fit, to be able to control the circumstances of the seizure to + this extent, and if Napoleon, who lived so public a life, furnished so + little evidence of epilepsy to his environment, it may be regarded as very + doubtful whether any true epilepsy existed, and on other grounds it seems + highly improbable.[3] + </p> + <p> + Of all these distinguished persons in the list of alleged epileptics, it + is naturally most profitable to investigate the case of the latest, + Flaubert, for here it is easiest to get at the facts. Maxime du Camp, a + friend in early life, though later incompatibility of temperament led to + estrangement, announced to the world in his <i>Souvenirs</i> that Flaubert + was an epileptic, and Goncourt mentions in his <i>Journal</i> that he was + in the habit of taking much bromide. But the "fits" never began until the + age of twenty-eight, which alone should suggest to a neurologist that they + are not likely to have been epileptic; they never occurred in public; he + could feel the fit coming on and would go and lie down; he never lost + consciousness; his intellect and moral character remained intact until + death. It is quite clear that there was no true epilepsy here, nor + anything like it.[4] Flaubert was of fairly sound nervous heredity on both + sides, and his father, a distinguished surgeon, was a man of keen + intellect and high character. The novelist, who was of robust physical and + mental constitution, devoted himself strenuously and exclusively to + intellectual work; it is not surprising that he was somewhat neurasthenic, + if not hysterical, and Dumesnil, who discusses this question in his book + on Flaubert, concludes that the "fits" may be called hysterical attacks of + epileptoid form. + </p> + <p> + It may well be that we have in Flaubert's case a clue to the "epilepsy" of + the other great men who in this matter are coupled with him. They were + nearly all persons of immense intellectual force, highly charged with + nervous energy; they passionately concentrated their energy on the + achievement of life tasks of enormous magnitude, involving the highest + tension of the organism. Under such conditions, even in the absence of all + bad heredity or of actual disease, convulsive discharges may occur. We may + see even in healthy and sound women that occasionally some physiological + and unrelieved overcharging of the organism with nervous energy may result + in what is closely like a hysterical fit, while even a violent fit of + crying is a minor manifestation of the same tendency. The feminine element + in genius has often been emphasised, and it may well be that under the + conditions of the genius-life when working at high pressure we have + somewhat similar states of nervous overcharging, and that from time to + time the tension is relieved, naturally and spontaneously, by a convulsive + discharge. This, at all events, seems a possible explanation. + </p> + <p> + It is rather strange that in these recklessly confident lists of eminent + "epileptics" we fail to find the one man of distinguished genius whom + perhaps we are justified in regarding as a true epileptic. Dostoievsky + appears to have been an epileptic from an early age; he remained liable to + epileptic fits throughout life, and they plunged him into mental dejection + and confusion. In many of his novels we find pictures of the epileptic + temperament, evidently based on personal experience, showing the most + exact knowledge and insight into all the phases of the disease. Moreover, + Dostoievsky in his own person appears to have displayed the perversions + and the tendency to mental deterioration which we should expect to find in + a true epileptic. So far as our knowledge goes, he really seems to stand + alone as a manifestation of supreme genius combined with epilepsy. Yet, as + Dr. Loygue remarks in his medico-psychological study of the great Russian + novelist, epilepsy only accounts for half of the man, and leaves + unexplained his passion for work; "the dualism of epilepsy and genius is + irreducible." + </p> + <p> + There is one other still more recent man of true genius, though not of the + highest rank, who may possibly be counted as epileptic: Vincent van Gogh, + the painter.[5] A brilliant and highly original artist, he was a + definitely abnormal man who cannot be said to have escaped mental + deterioration. Simple and humble and suffering, recklessly sacrificing + himself to help others, always in trouble, van Gogh had many points of + resemblance to Dostoievsky. He has, indeed, been compared to the "Idiot" + immortalised by Dostoievsky, in some aspects an imbecile, in some aspects + a saint. Yet epilepsy no more explains the genius of van Gogh than it + explains the genius of Dostoievsky. + </p> + <p> + Thus the impression we gain when, laying aside prejudice, we take a fairly + wide and impartial survey of the facts, or even when we investigate in + detail the isolated facts to which significance is most often attached, by + no means supports the notion that genius springs entirely, or even mainly, + from insane and degenerate stocks. In some cases, undoubtedly, it is found + in such stocks, but the ability displayed in these cases is rarely, + perhaps never, of any degree near the highest. It is quite easy to point + to persons of a certain significance, especially in literature and art, + who, though themselves sane, possess many near relatives who are highly + neurotic and sometimes insane. Such cases, however, are far from + justifying any confident generalisations concerning the intimate + dependence of genius on insanity. + </p> + <p> + We see, moreover, that to conclude that men of genius are rarely or never + the offspring of a radically insane parentage is not to assume that the + parents of men of genius are usually of average normal constitution. That + would in any case be improbable. Apart from the tendency to convergent + heredity already emphasised, there is a wider tendency to slight + abnormality, a minor degree of inaptness for ordinary life in the + parentage of genius. I found that in 5 per cent. cases (certainly much + below the real mark) of the British people of genius, one parent, + generally the father, had shown abnormality from a social or parental + point of view. He had been idle, or extravagant, or restless, or cruel, or + intemperate, or unbusinesslike, in the great majority of these cases + "unsuccessful." The father of Dickens (represented by his son in + Micawber), who was always vainly expecting something to turn up, is a good + type of these fathers of genius. Shakespeare's father may have been of + much the same sort. George Meredith's father, again, who was too superior + a person for the outfitting business he inherited, but never succeeded in + being anything else, is another example of this group of fathers of + genius. The father in these cases is a link of transition between the + normal stock and its brilliantly abnormal offshoot. In this transitional + stage we see, as it were, the stock <i>reculer pour mieux sauter</i>, but + it is in the son that the great leap is made manifest. + </p> + <p> + This peculiarity will serve to indicate that in a large proportion of + cases the parentage of genius is not entirely sound and normal. We must + dismiss absolutely the notion that the parents of persons of genius tend + to exhibit traits of a grossly insane or nervously degenerate character. + The evidence for such a view is confined to a minute proportion of cases, + and even then is usually doubtful. But it is another matter to assume that + the parentage of genius is absolutely normal, and still less can we assert + that genius always springs from entirely sound stocks. The statement is + sometimes made that all families contain an insane element. That statement + cannot be accepted. There are many people, including people of a high + degree of ability, who can trace no gross mental or nervous disease in + their families, unless remote branches are taken into account. Not many + statistics bearing on this point are yet available. But Jenny Roller, in a + very thorough investigation, found at Zurich in 1895 that "healthy" people + had in 28 per cent. cases directly, and in 59 per cent. cases indirectly + and altogether, a neuropathic heredity, while Otto Diem in 1905 found that + the corresponding percentages were still higher—33 and 69. It should + not, therefore, be matter for surprise if careful investigation revealed a + traceable neuropathic element at least as frequent as this in the families + which produce a man of genius. + </p> + <p> + It may further, I believe, be argued that the presence of a neuropathic + element of this kind in the ancestry of genius is frequently not without a + real significance. Aristotle said in his <i>Poetics</i> that poetry + demanded a man with "a touch of madness," though the ancients, who + frequently made a similar statement to this, had not our modern ideas of + neuropathic heredity in their minds, but merely meant that inspiration + simulated insanity. Yet "a touch of madness," a slight morbid strain, + usually neurotic or gouty, in a preponderantly robust and energetic stock, + seems to be often of some significance in the evolution of genius; it + appears to act, one is inclined to think, as a kind of ferment, leading to + a process out of all relation to its own magnitude. In the sphere of + literary genius, Milton, Flaubert, and William Morris may help to + illustrate this precious fermentative influence of a minor morbid element + in vitally powerful stocks. Without some such ferment as this the energy + of the stock, one may well suppose, might have been confined within normal + limits; the rare and exquisite flower of genius, we know, required an + abnormal stimulation; only in this sense is there any truth at all in + Lombroso's statement that the pearl of genius develops around a germ of + disease. But this is the utmost length to which the facts allow us to go + in assuming the presence of a morbid element as a frequent constituent of + genius. Even then we only have one of the factors of genius, to which, + moreover, undue importance cannot be attached when we remember how often + this ferment is present without any resultant process of genius. And we + are in any case far removed from any of those gross nervous lesions which + all careful guardianship of the race must tend to eliminate. + </p> + <p> + Thus we are brought back to the point from which we started. Would + eugenics stamp out genius? There is no need to minimise the fact that a + certain small proportion of men of genius have displayed highly morbid + characters, nor to deny that in a large proportion of cases a slightly + morbid strain may with care be detected in the ancestry of genius. But the + influence of eugenic considerations can properly be brought to bear only + in the case of grossly degenerate stocks. Here, so far as our knowledge + extends, the parentage of genius nearly always escapes. The destruction of + genius and its creation alike elude the eugenist. If there is a tendency + in modern civilisation towards a diminution in the manifestations of + genius—which may admit of question—-it can scarcely be due to + any threatened elimination of corrupt stocks. It may perhaps more + reasonably be sought in the haste and superficiality which our present + phase of urbanisation fosters, and only the most robust genius can + adequately withstand. + </p> + <p> + [1] A Danish alienist, Lange, has, however, made an attempt on a + statistical basis to show a connection between mental ability and mental + degeneracy. (F. Lange, <i>Degeneration in Families</i>, translated from + the Danish, 1907). He deals with 44 families which have provided 428 + insane or neuropathic persons within a few generations, and during the + same period a large number also of highly distinguished members, Cabinet + ministers, bishops, artists, poets, etc. But Lange admits that the forms + of insanity found in these families are of a slight and not severe + character, while it is clear that the forms of ability are also in most + cases equally slight; they are mostly "old" families, such as naturally + produce highly-trained and highly placed individuals. Moreover, Lange's + methods and style of writing are not scientifically exact, and he fails to + define precisely what he means by a "family." His investigation indicates + that there is a frequent tendency for men of ability to belong to families + which are not entirely sound, and that is a conclusion which is not + seriously disputed. + </p> + <p> + [2] Havelock Ellis, <i>A Study of British Genius</i>, 1904. + </p> + <p> + [3] Dr. Cabančs (<i>Indiscrétions de l'Histoire</i>, 3rd series) similarly + concludes that, while in temperament Napoleon may be said to belong to the + epileptic class, he was by no means an epileptic in the ordinary sense. + Kanngiesser (<i>Prager Medizinische Wochenschrift</i>, 1912, No. 27) + suggests that from his slow pulse (40 to 60) Napoleon's attacks may have + originated in the heart and vessels. + </p> + <p> + [4] Genuine epilepsy usually comes on before the age of twenty-five; it + very rarely begins after twenty-five, and never after thirty. (L.W. Weber, + <i>Münchener Medizinische Wochenschrift</i>, July 30th and Aug. 6th, + 1912.) In genuine epilepsy, also, loss of consciousness accompanies the + fits; the exceptions to this rule are rare, though Audenino, a pupil of + Lombroso, who sought to extend the sphere of epilepsy, believes that the + exceptions are not so rare as is commonly supposed (<i>Archivio di + Psichiatria</i>, fasc. VI., 1906). Moreover, true epilepsy is accompanied + by a progressive mental deterioration which terminates in dementia; in the + Craig Colony for Epileptics of New York, among 3,000 epileptics this + progressive deterioration is very rarely absent (<i>Lancet</i>, March 1st, + 1913); but it is not found in the distinguished men of genius who are + alleged to be epileptic. Epileptic deterioration has been elaborately + studied by MacCurdy, <i>Psychiatric Bulletin</i>, New York, April, 1916. + </p> + <p> + [5] See, <i>e.g.</i>, Elizabeth du Quesne van Gogh, <i>Personal + Recollections of Vincent van Gogh</i>, p. 46. These epileptic attacks are, + however, but vaguely mentioned, and it would seem that they only appeared + during the last years of the artist's life. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0014" id="link2H_4_0014"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + XIV — THE PRODUCTION OF ABILITY + </h2> + <p> + The growing interest in eugenics, and the world-wide decline in the + birth-rate, have drawn attention to the study of the factors which + determine the production of genius in particular and high ability in + general. The interest in this question, thus freshly revived and made more + acute by the results of the Great War, is not indeed new. It is nearly + half a century since Galton wrote his famous book on the heredity of + genius, or, as he might better have described the object of his + investigation, the heredity of ability. At a later date my own <i>Study of + British Genius</i> collectively summarised all the biological data + available concerning the parentage and birth of the most notable persons + born in England, while numerous other studies might also be named. + </p> + <p> + Such investigations are to-day acquiring a fresh importance, because, + while it is becoming realised that we are gaining a new control over the + conditions of birth, the production of children has itself gained in + importance. The world is no longer bombarded by an exuberant stream of + babies, good, bad, and indifferent in quality, with Mankind to look on + calmly at the struggle for existence among them. Whether we like it or + not, the quantity is relatively diminishing, and the question of quality + is beginning to assume a supreme significance. What are the conditions + which assure the finest quality in our children? + </p> + <p> + A German scientist, Dr. Vaerting, of Berlin, published on the eve of the + War a little book on the most favourable age in parents for the production + of children of ability (<i>Das günstigste elterliche Zeugungsalter</i>).[1] + He approaches the question entirely in this new spirit, not as a merely + academic topic of discussion, but as a practical matter of vital + importance to the welfare of society. He starts with the assertion that + "our century has been called the century of the child,"[2] and for the + child all manner of rights are now being claimed. But the prime right of + all, the right of the child to the best ability that his parents are able + to transmit to him, is never even so much as considered. Yet this right is + the root of all children's rights. And when the mysteries of procreation + have been so far revealed as to enable this right to be won, we shall, at + the same time, Dr. Vaerting adds, renew the spiritual aspect of the + nations. + </p> + <p> + The most easily ascertainable and measurable factor in the production of + ability, and certainly a factor which cannot be without significance, is + the age of the parents at the child's birth. It is this factor with which + Vaerting is mainly concerned, as illustrated by over one hundred German + men of genius concerning whom he has been able to obtain the required + data. Later on, he proposes to extend the inquiry to other nations. + </p> + <p> + Vaerting finds—and this is probably the most original, though, as we + shall see, not the most unquestionable of his findings—that the + fathers who are themselves of no notable intellectual distinction have a + decidedly more prolonged power of procreating distinguished children than + is possessed by distinguished fathers. The former, that is to say, may + become the fathers of eminent children from the period of sexual maturity + up to the age of forty-three or beyond. When, however, the father is + himself of high intellectual distinction, Vaerting finds that he was + nearly always under thirty, and usually under twenty-five years of age at + his distinguished son's birth, although the proportion of youthful fathers + in the general population is relatively small. The eleven youngest fathers + on Vaerting's list, from twenty-one to twenty-five years of age, were + (with one exception) themselves more or less distinguished, while the + fifteen oldest, from thirty-nine to sixty years of age, were all without + exception undistinguished. Among these sons are to be found much greater + names (Goethe, Bach, Kant, Bismarck, Wagner, etc.) than are to be found + among the sons of young and more distinguished fathers, for here there is + only one name (Frederick the Great) of the same calibre. The elderly + fathers belonged to large cities and were mostly married to wives very + much younger than themselves. Vaerting notes that the most eminent + geniuses have most frequently been the sons of fathers who were not + engaged in intellectual avocations at all, but earned their livings as + simple craftsmen. He draws the conclusion from these data that strenuous + intellectual energy is much more unfavourable than hard physical labour to + the production of ability in the offspring. Intellectual workers, + therefore, he argues, must have their children when young, and we must so + modify our social ideals and economic conditions as to render this + possible. That the mother should be equally young is not, he holds, + necessary; he finds some superiority, indeed, provided the father is + young, in somewhat elderly mothers, and there were no mothers under + twenty-three. The rarity of genius among the offspring of distinguished + parents is attributed to the unfortunate tendency to marry too late, and + Vaerting finds that the distinguished men who marry late rarely have any + children at all. Speaking generally, and apart from the production of + genius, he holds that women have children too early, before their psychic + development is completed, while men have children too late, when they have + already "in the years of their highest psychic generative fitness planted + their most precious seed in the mud of the street." + </p> + <p> + The eldest child was found to have by far the best chance of turning out + distinguished, and in this fact Vaerting finds further proof of his + argument. The third son has the next best chance, and then the second, the + comparatively bad position of the second being attributed to the too brief + interval which often follows the birth of the first child. He also notes + that of all the professions the clergy come beyond comparison first as the + parents of distinguished sons (who are, however, rarely of the highest + degree of eminence), lawyers following, while officers in the army and + physicians scarcely figure at all. Vaerting is inclined to see in this + order, especially in the predominance of the clergy, the favourable + influence of an unexhausted reserve of energy and a habit of chastity on + intellectual procreativeness. This is one of his main conclusions. + </p> + <p> + It so happens that in my own <i>Study of British Genius</i>, with which + Dr. Vaerting was unacquainted when he made his first investigation, I + dealt on a larger scale, and perhaps with somewhat more precise method, + with many of these same questions as they are illustrated by English + genius. Vaerting's results have induced me to re-examine and to some + extent to manipulate afresh the English data. My results, like Dr. + Vaerting's, showed a special tendency for genius to appear in the eldest + child, though there was no indication of notably early marriage in the + parents.[3] I also found a similar predominance of the clergy among the + fathers and a similar deficiency of army officers and physicians. The most + frequent age of the father was thirty-two years, but the average age of + the father at the distinguished child's birth was 36.6 years, and when the + fathers were themselves distinguished their age was not, as Vaerting found + in Germany, notably low at the birth of their distinguished sons, but + higher than the general average, being 37.5 years. There have been fifteen + distinguished English sons of distinguished fathers, but instead of being + nearly always under thirty and usually under twenty-five, as Vaerting + found in Germany, the English distinguished father has only five times + been under thirty and among these five only twice under twenty-five. + Moreover, precisely the most distinguished of the sons (Francis Bacon and + William Pitt) had the oldest fathers and the least distinguished sons the + youngest fathers. + </p> + <p> + I made some attempt to ascertain whether different kinds of genius tend to + be produced by fathers who were at different periods of life. I refrained + from publishing the results as I doubted whether the numbers dealt with + were sufficiently large to carry any weight. It may, however, be worth + while to record them, as possibly they are significant. I made four + classes of men of genius: (1) Men of Religion, (2) Poets, (3) Practical + Men, and (4) Scientific Men and Sceptics. (It must not, of course, be + supposed that in this last group all the scientific men were sceptics, or + all the sceptics scientific.) The average age of the fathers at the + distinguished son's birth was, in the first group, 35 years, in the second + and third groups 37 years, and in the last group 40 years. (It may be + noted, however, that the youngest father of all in the history of British + genius, aged sixteen, produced Napier, who introduced logarithms.) It is + difficult not to believe that as regards, at all events, the two most + discrepant groups, the first and last, we here come on a significant + indication. It is not unreasonable to suppose that in the production of + men of religion, in whose activity emotion is so potent a factor, the + youthful age of the father should prove favourable, while for the + production of genius of a more coldly intellectual and analytic type more + elderly fathers are demanded. If that should prove to be so, it would + become a source of happiness to religious parents to have their children + early, while irreligious persons should be advised to delay parentage. It + is scarcely necessary to remark that the age of the mothers is probably + quite as influential as that of the fathers. Concerning the mothers, + however, we always have less precise information. My records, so far as + they go, agree with Vaerting's for German genius, in indicating that an + elderly mother is more likely to produce a child of genius than a very + youthful mother. There were only fifteen mothers recorded under + twenty-five years of age, while thirteen were over thirty-nine years; the + most frequent age of the mothers was twenty-seven. On all these points we + certainly need controlling evidence from other countries. Thus, before we + insist with Vaerting that an elderly mother is a factor in the production + of genius, we may recall that even in Germany the mothers of Goethe and + Nietzsche were both eighteen at their distinguished sons' birth. A rule + which permits of such tremendous exceptions scarcely seems to bear the + strain of emphasis. + </p> + <p> + It must always be remembered that while the study of genius is highly + interesting, and even, it is probable, not without significance for the + general laws of heredity, we must not too hastily draw conclusions from it + to bear on practical questions of eugenics. Genius is rare and abnormal; + laws meant to apply to the general population must be based on a study of + the general population. Vaerting, who is alive to the practical character + which such problems are to-day assuming, realises how inadequate it is to + confine our study to genius. Marro, in his valuable book on puberty, some + years ago brought forward interesting data showing the result of the age + of the parents on the moral and intellectual characters of school-children + in North Italy. He found that children with fathers below twenty-six at + their birth showed the maximum of bad conduct and the minimum of good; + they also yielded the greatest proportion of children of irregular, + troublesome, or lazy character, but not of really perverse children who + were equally distributed among fathers of all ages. The largest number of + cheerful children belonged to young fathers, while the children tended to + become more melancholy with ascending age of the fathers. Young fathers + produced the largest proportion of intelligent, as well as of troublesome + children, but when the very exceptionally intelligent children were + considered separately they were found to be more usually the offspring of + elderly fathers. As regards the mothers, Marro found that the children of + young mothers (under twenty-one) are superior, both as regards conduct and + intelligence, though the more exceptionally intelligent children tended to + belong to more mature mothers. When the parents were both in the same + age-group the immature and the elderly groups tended to produce more + children who were unsatisfactory, both as regards conduct and + intelligence, than the intermediate group.[4] + </p> + <p> + But we need to have such inquiries made on a more wholesale and systematic + scale. They are no longer of a merely speculative character. We no longer + regard children as the "gifts of God," flung into our helpless hands; we + are beginning to realise that the responsibility is ours to see that they + come into the world under the best conditions, and at the moments when + their parents are best fitted to produce them. Vaerting proposes that it + should be the business of all school authorities to register the ages of + the pupils' parents. This is scarcely a provision to which even the most + susceptible parent could reasonably object, though there is no cause to + make the declaration compulsory where a "conscientious" objection existed, + and in any case the declaration would not be public. It would be an + advantage—though this might be more difficult to obtain—to + have the date of the parents' marriage, and of the birth of previous + children, as well as some record of the father's standing in his + occupation. But even the ages of the parents alone would teach us much + when correlated with the school position of the pupil in intelligence and + in conduct. It is quite true that there are unavoidable fallacies. We are + not, as in the case of genius, dealing with people whose life-work is + complete and open to the whole world's examination. The good and clever + child is not necessarily the forerunner of the first-class man or woman; + and many capable and successful men have been careless in attendance at + lectures and rebellious to discipline. Moreover, the prejudice and + limitations of the teachers have also to be recognised. Yet when we are + dealing with millions most of these fallacies would be smoothed out. We + should be, once for all, in a position to determine authoritatively the + exact bearing of one of the simplest and most vital factors of the + betterment of the race. We should be in possession of a new clue to guide + us in the creation of the man of the coming world. Why not begin to-day? + </p> + <p> + [1] He has further discussed the subject in <i>Die Neue Generation</i>, + Aug.-Nov., 1914, and in a more recent (1916) pamphlet which I have not + seen. + </p> + <p> + [2] The reference is to <i>The Century of the Child</i>, by Ellen Key, who + writes (English translation, p. 2): "My conviction is that the + transformation of human nature will take place, not when the whole of + humanity becomes Christian, but when the whole of humanity awakens to the + consciousness of the 'holiness of generation.' This consciousness will + make the central work of Society the new race, its origin, its management, + and its education; about these all morals, all laws, all social + arrangements will be grouped." + </p> + <p> + [3] It is not only ability, but idiocy, criminality and many other + abnormalities which specially tend to appear in the first-born. The + eldest-born represents the point of greatest variation in the family, and + the variation thus yielded may be in either direction, useful or useless, + good or bad. See, <i>e.g.</i>, Havelock Ellis, <i>A Study of British + Genius</i>, pp. 117-120. Sören Hansen, "The Inferior Quality of the + First-born Children," <i>Eugenics Review</i>, Oct., 1913. + </p> + <p> + [4] Marro, <i>La Pubertŕ</i> (French translation <i>La Puberté</i>), Ch. + XI. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0015" id="link2H_4_0015"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + XV — MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE + </h2> + <p> + We contemplate our marriage system with satisfaction. We remember the many + unquestionable evidences in favour of it, and we marvel that it so often + proves a failure. For while we remember the evidence in favour of it, we + forget the evidence against it, and we overlook the important fact that + our favourable evidence is largely based on the vision of an abstract or + idealised monogamy which fails to correspond to the detailed and ever + varying system which in practice we cherish. We point to the fact that + monogamic marriage has probably flourished throughout the history of the + world, that it exists among savages, even among animals, but we fail to + observe how far that monogamy differs from ours, even assuming that our + monogamy is a real monogamy and not a disguised polygamy, especially in + the fact that it is a free union and only subject to the inherent + penalties that follow its infraction, not to external penalties. Ours is + not free; our faith in its natural virtues is not quite so firm as we + assert; we are always meddling with it and worrying over its health and + anxiously trying to bolster it up. We are not by any means willing to let + it rest on the sanction of its own natural or divine laws. Our feeling is, + as James Hinton used ironically to express it: "Poor God with no one to + help Him!" + </p> + <p> + The fact is that when we compare our civilised marriage system with + marriage as it exists in Nature, we fail to realise a fundamental + distinction. Our marriage system is made up of two absolutely different + elements which cannot blend. On the one hand, it is the manifestation of + our deepest and most volcanic impulses. On the other hand, it is an + elaborate web of regulations—legal, ecclesiastical, economic—which + is to-day quite out of relation to our impulses. On the one hand, it is a + force which springs from within; on the other hand, it is a force which + presses on us from without.[1] One says broadly that these two elements of + marriage, as we understand it, are out of relation to each other. But + there is an important saving qualification to be made. The inner impulse + is not without law, and the external pressure is not without an ultimate + basis of nature. That is to say, that under free and natural conditions + the inner impulse tends to develop itself, not licentiously but with its + own order and restraints, while, on the other hand, our inherited + regulations are largely the tradition of ancient attempts to fix and + register that natural order and restraint. The disharmony comes in with + the fact that our regulations are traditional and ancient, not our own + attempts to fix and register the natural order but inextricably mixed up + with elements that are entirely alien to our civilised habits of life. + Whatever our attitude towards mediaeval Canon Law may be—whether + reverence or indifference or disgust—it yet holds us and is + ingrained into our marriage system to-day. Canon Law was a good and vital + thing under the conditions which produced it. The survival of Canon Law + to-day, with the antiquated and ascetic conception of the subordination of + women associated with it, is the chief reason why we in the twentieth + century have not yet progressed so far towards a reasonable system of + marriage as the Romans had reached on the basis of their law, nearly two + thousand years ago.[2] Marriage is conditioned both by inner impulse and + outward pressure. But a healthy impulse bears within it an order and + restraint of its own, while a truly moral outward pressure is based, not + on the demands of mediaeval days, but on the demands of our own day. + </p> + <p> + How far this is from being the case yet we find well illustrated by our + divorce methods. All our modern culture favour a sense of the sacredness + of the sexual relations; we cherish a delicate reserve concerning all the + intimacies of personal relationship. But when the magic word "Divorce" is + uttered we fling all our civilisation to the winds, and in the desecrated + name of Law we proceed to an inquisition which scarcely differs at all + from those public tests of mediaeval law-courts which now we dare not + venture even to put into words. + </p> + <p> + It is true that we are not bound to be consistent when it is an advantage + to be inconsistent. And if there were a method in our madness it would be + justified. But there is no method. From first to last the history of + divorce (read it, for instance, in Howard's <i>Matrimonial Institutions</i>) + is an ever shifting record of cruel blunders and ridiculous absurdities. + Divorce began in modern times in flagrant injustice to one of the two + partners, the wife, and it has ended—if we may hope that the end is + approaching—in imbecilities that to future ages will be incredible. + For no legal jargon has ever been invented that will express the + sympathies and the antipathies of human relationship; they even escape the + subtlest expression. Law-makers have tortured their brains to devise + formulas which will cover the legitimate grounds for divorce. How vain + their efforts are is sufficiently shown by the fact that by no chance can + they ever agree on their formulas, and that they are changing them + constantly with feverish haste, dimly realising that they are but the + antiquated representatives of mediaevalism, and that soon their occupation + will be gone for ever. + </p> + <p> + The reasons for the making or the breaking of human relationships can + never be formulated. The only result of such legal formulas is that they + bring law into contempt because they have to be ingeniously and + methodically cheated in order to adapt them in any degree to civilised + human needs. Thus such laws not only degrade the name of Law, but they + degrade the whole community which tolerates them. There is only one + ultimate reason for either marriage or divorce, and that is that the two + persons concerned consent to the marriage or consent to the divorce. Why + they consent is no concern of any third party, and, maybe, they cannot + even put it into words. + </p> + <p> + At the same time, let us not forget, marriage and divorce are a very real + concern of the State, and law cannot ignore either. It is the business of + the State to see to it that no interests are injured. The contract of + marriage and the contract of divorce are private matters, but it is + necessary to guard that no injury is thereby done to either of the + contracting persons, or to third parties, or to the community as a whole. + The State may have a right to say what persons are unfit for marriage, or + at all events for procreation; the State must take care that the weaker + party is not injured; the State is especially bound to watch over the + interests of children, and this involves, in the best issue, that each + child shall have two effective parents, whether or not those parents are + living together. A large scope—we are beginning to recognise—must + be left alike to freedom of marriage and freedom of divorce, but the State + must mark out the limits within which that freedom is exercised. + </p> + <p> + The loosening hold of the State on marriage is by no means connected with + any growing sense of the value of divorce. At the best, it is probable + that divorce is merely a necessary evil. One of the chief reasons why we + should seek to promote education in relation to sexual relationships and + to inculcate the responsibilities of such relationships, so making the + approach to marriage more circumspect, is in order to obviate the need for + divorce. For divorce is always a confession of failure. Very often, + indeed, it involves not only a confession of failure in one particular + marriage but of failure for marriage generally. One notes how often the + people who fail in a first marriage fail even more hopelessly in the + second. They have chosen the wrong partners; but one suspects that for + them all partners will prove the wrong partners. One sometimes hears + nowadays that a succession of marriage relationships is desirable in order + to develop character. But that depends on many things. It very much + depends on what character there is to develop. A man may have + relationships with a hundred women and develop much less character out of + his experience, and even acquire a much less intimate knowledge of women, + than the man who has spent his life in an endless series of adventures + with one woman. It depends a good deal on the man and not a little on the + woman. + </p> + <p> + Thus the work of marriage in the world must depend entirely on the nature + of that world. A fine marriage system can only be produced by a fine + civilisation of which it is the exquisite flower. Laws cannot better + marriage; even education, by itself, is powerless, necessary as it is in + conjunction with other influences. The love-relationships of men and women + must develop freely, and with due allowance for the variations which the + complexities of civilisation demand. But these relationships touch the + whole of life at so infinite a number of points that they cannot even + develop at all save in a society that is itself developing graciously and + harmoniously. Do not expect to pluck figs from thistles. As a society is, + so will its marriages be. + </p> + <p> + [1] It is this artificial and external pressure which often produces a + revolt against marriage. The author of a remarkable paper entitled, "Our + Incestuous Marriage," in the <i>Forum</i> (Dec., 1915), advocates a reform + of social marriage customs "in conformance with the freedom-loving modern + nature," and the introduction of "a fresh atmosphere for married life in + which personality can be made to appear so sacred and free that marriage + will be undertaken and borne as lightly and gracefully as a secret sin." + </p> + <p> + [2] See Sir James Donaldson, <i>Woman: Her Position and Influence in + Ancient Greece and Rome, 1907</i>; also S.B. Kitchin's excellent <i>History + of Divorce</i>, 1912; this author believes that the tendency in modern + civilisation is to return to the simple principles of Roman law involving + divorce by consent. See also Havelock Ellis, <i>Sex in Relation to Society</i>, + Ch. X. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0016" id="link2H_4_0016"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + XVI — THE MEANING OF THE BIRTH-RATE + </h2> + <p> + The history of educated opinion concerning the birth-rate and its + interpretation during the past seventy years is full of interest. The + actual operative factors—natural, pathological, economic, social, + and educational—in raising or lowering the birth-rate, are numerous + and complicated, and it is difficult to determine exactly how large a part + each factor plays. But without determining that at all, it is still very + instructive to observe the evolution of popular intelligent opinion + concerning the significance of a high and a low birth-rate. + </p> + <p> + Popular opinion on this matter may be said to have passed through three + stages. I am referring to Western Europe and more particularly to England + and Germany, for it must be remembered that, in this matter, England and + Germany are running a parallel course. England happens to be, on the + whole, a little ahead, having reached its period of full expansion at a + somewhat earlier period than Germany, but each people is pursuing the same + course. + </p> + <p> + In the first stage—let us say about the middle of the last century + and the succeeding thirty years—the popular attitude was one of + jubilant satisfaction in a high and rising birth-rate. There had been an + immense expansion of industry. The whole world seemed nothing but a great + field for the energetic and industrial nations to exploit. Workers were + needed to keep up with the expansion and to keep down wages to a rate + which would make industrial expansion easy; soldiers and armaments were + needed to protect the movements of expansion. It seemed to the more + exuberant spirits that a vast British Empire, or a mighty Pan-Germany, + might be expected to cover the whole world. France, with its low and + falling birth-rate, was looked down at with contempt as a decadent country + inhabited by a degenerate population. No attempts to analyse the + birth-rate, to ascertain what are really the biological, social, and + economic accompaniments of a high birth-rate, made any impression on the + popular mind. They were drowned in the general shout of exultation. + </p> + <p> + That era of optimism was followed by a swift reaction. Towards 1880 the + upward movement of the birth-rate began to be arrested; it soon began + steadily to fall, as it is continuing to do to-day. In France it is + falling slowly, in Italy more rapidly, in England and Prussia still more + rapidly. As, however, the fall began earliest in France, the birth-rate is + lower there than in the other countries named; for the same reason it is + lower in England than in Prussia, although England stands in this respect + at almost exactly the same distance from Prussia to-day as thirty years + ago, the fall having occurred at the same rate in both countries. It is + quite possible that in the future it may become more rapid in Prussia than + in England, for the birth-rate of Berlin is lower than the birth-rate of + London, and urbanisation is proceeding at a more rapid rate in Germany + than in England. + </p> + <p> + The realisation of such facts as these produced a period of pessimism + which marks the second stage in this evolution. The great movement of + expansion, which seemed to promise so much to ambitious nations anxious + for world-power, was being arrested. Moreover, it began to be realised + that the rapid growth of a community was accompanied by phenomena which + had not been foreseen by the enthusiasts of the first period of optimism. + They had argued—not indeed verbally but in effect—that the + higher the birth-rate the cheaper labour and lives would become, and the + cheaper labour and lives were, the easier it would be for a nation with + its industrial armies and its military armies to get ahead of other rival + nations. But they had not realised that, with the growth of popular + education in modern democratic states, cheap labour is no longer willing + to play without protest this humble and suffering part in national + progress. The workers of the nations began to declare, clearly or + obscurely, as they were able, that they no longer intended to sell their + labour and their lives so cheaply. The rising birth-rate of the middle of + the nineteenth century coincided with, and to a large extent doubtless + produced, the organisation of labour, trades unions, the political + activity of the working classes, Socialism, as well as the extreme forms + of Anarchism and Syndicalism. It was when these movements began to attain + a high degree of organisation and power that the birth-rate began to + decline. Thus the pessimists of the second period were faced by horrors on + both sides. On the one hand, they saw that the ever-increasing rate of + human production which seemed to them the essential condition of national, + social, even moral progress, had not only stopped but was steadily + diminishing. On the other hand, they saw that, even in so far as it was + maintained, it involved, under modern conditions, nothing but social + commotion and economic disturbance. + </p> + <p> + There are still many pessimists of this second period alive among us, and + actively proclaiming their gospel of despair, alike in England and in + Germany. But a new generation is growing up, and this question is now + entering a third period. The new generation rejects alike the passive + optimism of the first period and the passive pessimism of the second + period. Its attitude is hopeful but it realises that mere hope is vain + unless there is clear intellectual vision and unless there is individual + and social action in accordance with that vision. + </p> + <p> + It is to-day beginning to be seen that the old notion of progress by means + of reckless multiplication is vain. It can only be effected at a ruinous + cost of death, disease, poverty, and misery. We see this in the past + history of Western Europe, as we still see it in the history of Russia. + Any progress effected along that line—if "progress" it can be called—is + now barred, for it is absolutely opposed to those democratic conceptions + which are ever gaining greater influence among us. + </p> + <p> + Moreover, we are now better able to analyse demographic phenomena and we + are no longer satisfied with any crude statements regarding the + birth-rate. We realise that they need interpretation. They have to be + considered in relation to the sex-constitution and the age-constitution of + the population, and, above all, they must be viewed in relation to the + infant mortality-rate. The bad aspect of the French birth-rate is not so + much its lowness as that it is accompanied by a high infantile mortality. + The fact that the German birth-rate is higher than the English ceases to + be a matter of satisfaction when it is realised that German infantile + mortality is vastly greater than English. A high birth-rate is no sign of + a high civilisation. But we are beginning to feel that a high infantile + death-rate is a sign of a very inferior civilisation. A low birth-rate + with a low infant death-rate not only produces the same increase in the + population as a high birth-rate with the high death-rate, which always + accompanies it (for there are no examples of, a high birth-rate with a low + death-rate), but it produces it in a way which is far more worthy of our + admiration in this matter than the way of Russia and China where opposite + conditions prevail.[1] + </p> + <p> + It used to be thought that small families were immoral. We now begin to + see that it was the large families of old which were immoral. The + excessive birth-rate of the early industrial period was directly + stimulated by selfishness. There were no laws against child-labour; + children were produced that they might be sent out, when little more than + babies, to the factories and the mines to increase their parents' incomes. + The diminished birth-rate has accompanied higher moral transformation. It + has introduced a finer economy into life, diminished death, disease, and + misery. It is indirectly, and even directly, improving the quality of the + race. The very fact that children are born at longer intervals is not only + beneficial to the mother's health, and therefore to the children's general + welfare, but it has been proved to have a marked and prolonged influence + on the physical development of children. + </p> + <p> + Social progress, and a higher civilisation, we thus see, involve a reduced + birth-rate and a reduced death-rate; the fewer the children born, the + fewer the risks of death, disease, and misery to the children that are + born. The fact that civilisation involves small families is clearly shown + by the tendency of the educated and upper social classes to have small + families. As the proletariat class becomes educated and elevated, + disciplined to refinement and to foresight—as it were aristocratised—it + also has small families. Civilisational progress is here in a line with + biological progress. The lower organisms spawn their progeny in thousands, + the higher mammals produce but one or two at a time. The higher the race + the fewer the offspring. + </p> + <p> + Thus diminution in quantity is throughout associated with augmentation in + quality. Quality rather than quantity is the racial ideal now set before + us, and it is an ideal which, as we are beginning to learn, it is possible + to cultivate, both individually and socially. The day is coming, as Engel + remarks in his useful book on <i>The Elements of Child Protection</i>, + when fatherhood and motherhood will only be permitted to the strong. That + is why the new science of eugenics or racial hygiene is acquiring so + immense an importance. In the past racial selection has been carried out + crudely by the destructive, wasteful, and expensive method of elimination, + through death. In the future it will be carried out far more effectively + by conscious and deliberate selection, exercised not merely before birth, + but before conception and even before mating. It is idle to suppose that + such a change can be exerted by mere legislation, for which, besides, our + scientific knowledge is still inadequate. We cannot, indeed, desire any + compulsory elimination of the unfit or any regulated breeding of the fit. + Such notions are idle. Man can only be bred from within, through the + medium of his intelligence and will, working together under the control of + a high sense of responsibility. Galton, who recognised the futility of + mere legislation to elevate the race, believed that the hope of the future + lay in eugenics becoming a part of religion. The good of the race lies, + not in the production of a super-man, but of a super-humanity. This can + only be attained through personal individual development, the increase of + knowledge, the sense of responsibility towards the race, enabling men to + act in accordance with responsibility. The leadership in civilisation + belongs not to the nation with the highest birth-rate but to the nation + which has thus learnt to produce the finest men and women. + </p> + <p> + [1] For a more detailed discussion of these points see the author's <i>Task + of Social Hygiene</i>. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0017" id="link2H_4_0017"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + XVII — CIVILISATION AND THE BIRTH-RATE + </h2> + <p> + It was inevitable that the Great War of to-day should lead to an outcry, + in all the countries engaged, for more children and larger families. In + Germany and in Austria, in France and in England, panic-stricken fanatics + are found who preach to the people that the birth-rate is falling and the + nation is decaying. No scheme is too wild for the supposed benefit of the + country in a fierce coming fight for commercial supremacy, as well as with + due regard to the requirements in cannon fodder of another Great War + twenty years hence. + </p> + <p> + It may be well, however, to pause before we listen to these Quixotic + plans.[1] We may then find reason to think, not only that any attempt to + arrest the falling birth-rate is scarcely likely to be effective in view + of the fact that it affects not one country only but all the countries + that count, but that even if it could be successful it would be + mischievous. Whatever the results of the War may be, one result is fairly + certain and that is that, under the most favourable circumstances, every + country will emerge laden with misery and debt; whatever prosperity may + follow, living will be expensive for a long time to come and the incomes + of all classes heavily burdened. A Bounty on Babies would hardly make up + for these difficulties. The happy family, under the conditions that seem + to be immediately ahead of us, is likely to be the small family. The large + family—as indeed has been the case in the past—is likely to be + visited by disease and death. + </p> + <p> + But there is more to be said than this. We must dismiss altogether the + statement so often made that a falling birth-rate means "an old and dying + community." The Germans have for years been making this remark + contemptuously regarding the French. But to-day they have to recognise a + vitality in the French which they had not expected, while in recent years, + also, their own birth-rate has been falling more rapidly than that of + France. Nor is it true that a falling birth-rate means a falling + population; the French birth-rate has long been steadily falling, yet the + French population has been steadily increasing all the time, though less + rapidly than it would had not the death-rate been abnormally high. It is + not the number of babies born that counts, but the net result in surviving + children. An enormous number of babies are born in China; but an enormous + number die while still babies. So that it is better to have a few babies + of good quality than a large number of indifferent quality, for the + falling birth-rate is more than compensated by the falling death-rate. + That is what we are attaining in England, and, as we know, our steadily + falling birth-rate results in a steadily growing population. + </p> + <p> + There is still more to be said. Small families and a falling birth-rate + are not merely no evil, they are a positive good. They are a gain for + humanity. They represent an evolutionary rise in Nature and a higher stage + in civilisation. We are here in the presence of great fundamental + principles of progress which have been working through life from the + beginning. + </p> + <p> + At the beginning of life on the earth reproduction ran riot. Of one minute + organism it is estimated that, if its reproduction were not checked by + death or destruction, in thirty days it would form a mass a million times + larger than the sun. The conger-eel lays fifteen million eggs, and if they + all grew up, and reproduced themselves on the same scale, in two years the + whole sea would become a wriggling mass of fish. As we approach the higher + forms of life reproduction gradually dies down. The animals nearest to man + produce few offspring, but they surround them with parental care, until + they are able to lead independent lives with a fair chance of surviving. + The whole process may be regarded as a mechanism for slowly subordinating + quantity to quality, and so promoting the evolution of life to ever higher + stages. + </p> + <p> + This process, which is plain to see on the largest scale throughout living + nature, may be more minutely studied, as it acts within a narrower range, + in the human species. Here we statistically formulate it in the terms of + birth-rate and death-rate; by the mutual relationship of the two courses + of the birth-rate and the death-rate we are able to estimate the + evolutionary rank of a nation, and the degree in which it has succeeded in + subordinating the primitive standard of quantity to the higher and later + standard of quality. + </p> + <p> + It is especially in Europe that we can investigate this relationship by + the help of statistics which in some cases extend for nearly a century + back. We can trace the various phases through which each nation passes, + the effects of prosperity, the influence of education and sanitary + improvement, the general complex development of civilisation, in each case + moving forward, though not regularly and steadily, to higher stages by + means of a falling birth-rate, which is to some extent compensated by a + falling death-rate, the two rates nearly always running parallel, so that + a temporary rise in the birth-rate is usually accompanied by a rise in the + death-rate, by a return, that is to say, towards the conditions which we + find at the beginning of animal life, and a steady fall in the birth-rate + is always accompanied by a fall in the death-rate. + </p> + <p> + The modern phase of this movement, soon after which our precise knowledge + begins, may be said to date from the industrial expansion, due to the + introduction of machinery, which Professor Marshall places in England + about the year 1760. That represents the beginning of an era in which all + civilised and semi-civilised countries are still living. For the earlier + centuries we lack precise data, but we are able to form certain probable + conclusions. The population of a country in those ages seems to have grown + very slowly and sometimes even to have retrograded. At the end of the + sixteenth century the population of England and Wales is estimated at five + millions and at the end of the seventeenth at six millions—only 20 + per cent. increase during the century—although during the nineteenth + century the population nearly quadrupled. This very gradual increase of + the population seems to have been by no means due to a very low + birth-rate, but to a very high death-rate. Throughout the Middle Ages a + succession of virulent plagues and pestilences devastated Europe. + Small-pox, which may be considered the latest of these, used to sweep off + large masses of the youthful population in the eighteenth century. The + result was a certain stability and a certain well-being in the population + as a whole, these conditions being, however, maintained in a manner that + was terribly wasteful and distressing. + </p> + <p> + The industrial revolution introduced a new era which began to show its + features clearly in the early nineteenth century. On the one hand, a new + motive had arisen to favour a more rapid increase of population. Small + children could tend machinery and thereby earn wages to increase the + family takings. This led to an immediate result in increased population + and increased prosperity. But, on the other hand, the rapid increase of + population always tended to outrun the rapid increase of prosperity, and + the more so since the rise of sanitary science began to drive back the + invasions of the grosser and more destructive infectious diseases which + had hitherto kept the population down. The result was that new forms of + disease, distress, and destitution arose; the old stability was lost, and + the new prosperity produced unrest in place of well-being. The social + consciousness was still too immature to deal collectively with the + difficulties and frictions which the industrial era introduced, and the + individualism which under former conditions had operated wholesomely now + acted perniciously to crush the souls and bodies of the workers, whether + men, women, or children. + </p> + <p> + As we know, the increase of knowledge and the growth of the social + consciousness have slowly acted wholesomely during the past century to + remedy the first evil results of the industrial revolution. The artificial + and abnormal increase of the population has been checked because it is no + longer permissible in most countries to stunt the minds and bodies of + small children by placing them in factories. An elaborate system of + factory legislation was devised, and is still ever drawing fresh groups of + workers within its protective meshes. Sanitary science began to develop + and to exert an enormous influence on the health of nations. At the same + time the supreme importance of popular education was realised. The total + result was that the nature of "prosperity" began to be transformed; + instead of being, as it had been at the beginning of the industrial era, a + direct appeal to the gratification of gross appetites and reckless lusts, + it became an indirect stimulus to higher gratifications and more remote + aspirations. Foresight became a dominating motive even in the general + population, and a man's anxiety for the welfare of his family was no + longer forgotten in the pleasure of the moment. The social state again + became more stable, and mere "prosperity" was transformed into + civilisation. This is the state of things now in progress in all + industrial countries, though it has reached varying levels of development + among different peoples. + </p> + <p> + It is thus clear that the birth-rate combined with the death-rate + constitutes a delicate instrument for the measurement of civilisation, and + that the record of their combined curves registers the upward or downward + course of every nation. The curves, as we know, tend to be parallel, and + when they are not parallel we are in the presence of a rare and abnormal + state of things which is usually temporary or transitional. + </p> + <p> + It is instructive from this point of view to study the various nations of + Europe, for here we find a large number of small nations, each with its + own statistical system, confined within a small space and living under + fairly uniform conditions. Let us take the latest official figures (which + are usually for 1913) and attempt to measure the civilisation of European + countries on this basis. Beginning with the lowest birth-rate, and + therefore in gradually descending rank of superiority, we find that the + European countries stand in the following order: France, Belgium, Ireland, + Sweden, the United Kingdom, Switzerland, Norway, Scotland, Denmark, + Holland, the German Empire, Prussia, Finland, Spain, Austria, Italy, + Hungary, Serbia, Bulgaria, Roumania, Russia. If we take the death-rate + similarly, beginning with the lowest rate and gradually proceeding to the + highest, we find the following order: Holland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, + Switzerland, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Scotland, Prussia, the German + Empire, Finland, Ireland, France, Italy, Austria, Serbia, Spain, Bulgaria, + Hungary, Roumania, Russia. + </p> + <p> + Now we cannot accept the birth-rates and death-rates of the various + countries exactly at their face value. Temporary conditions, as well as + the special composition of a population, not to mention peculiarities of + registration, exert a disturbing effect. Roughly and on the whole, + however, the figures are acceptable. It is instructive to find how closely + the two rates agree. The agreement is, indeed, greater at the bottom than + at the top; the eight countries which constitute the lowest group as + regards birth-rate are the identical eight countries which furnish the + heaviest death-rates. That was to be expected; a very high birth-rate + seems fatally to involve a very high death-rate. But a very low birth-rate + (as we see in the cases of France and Ireland) is not invariably + associated with a very low death-rate, though it is never associated with + a high death-rate. This seems to indicate that those qualities in a highly + civilised nation which restrain the production of offspring do not always + or at once produce the eugenic racial qualities possessed by hardier + peoples living under simpler conditions. But with these reservations it is + not difficult to combine the two lists in a fairly concordant order of + descending rank. Most readers will agree, that taking the European + populations in bulk, without regard to the production of genius (for men + of genius are always a very minute fraction of a nation), the European + populations which they are accustomed to regard as standing at the head in + the general diffusion of character, intelligence, education, and + well-being, are all included in the first twelve or thirteen nations, + which are the same in both lists though they do not follow the same order. + These peoples, as peoples—that is, without regard to their size, + their political importance, or their production of genius—represent + the highest level of democratic civilisation in Europe. + </p> + <p> + It is scarcely necessary to add that various countries outside Europe + equal or excel them; the death-rate of the United States, so far as + statistics show, is the same as that of Sweden; that of Ontario, still + better, is the same as Denmark; while the death-rate of the Australian + Commonwealth, with a medium birth-rate, is lower than that of any European + country, and New Zealand holds the world's championship in this field with + the lowest death-rate of all. On the other hand, some extra-European + countries compare less favourably with Europe; Japan, with a rather high + birth-rate, has the same high death-rate as Spain, and Chile, with a still + higher birth-rate, has a higher death-rate than Russia. So it is that + among human peoples we find the same laws prevailing as among animals, and + the higher nations of the world differ from those which are less highly + evolved precisely as the elephant differs from the herring, though within + a narrower range, that is to say, by producing fewer offspring and taking + better care of them. + </p> + <p> + The whole of this evolutionary process, we have to remember, is a natural + process. It has been going on from the beginning of the living world. But + at a certain stage in the higher development of man, without ceasing to be + natural, it becomes conscious and deliberate. It is then that we have what + may properly be termed <i>Birth Control</i>. That is to say, that a + process which had before been working slowly through the ages, attaining + every new forward step with waste and pain, is henceforth carried out + voluntarily, in the light of the high human qualities of reason and + foresight and self-restraint. The rise of birth control may be said to + correspond with the rise of social and sanitary science in the first half + of the nineteenth century, and to be indeed an essential part of that + movement. It is firmly established in all the most progressive and + enlightened countries of Europe, notably in France and in England; in + Germany, where formerly the birth-rate was very high, birth control has + developed with extraordinary rapidity during the present century. In + Holland its principle and practice are freely taught by physicians and + nurses to the mothers of the people, with the result that there is in + Holland no longer any necessity for unwanted babies, and this small + country possesses the proud privilege of the lowest death-rate in Europe. + In the free and enlightened democratic communities on the other side of + the globe, in Australia and New Zealand, the same principles and practice + are generally accepted, with the same beneficent results. On the other + hand, in the more backward and ignorant countries of Europe, birth control + is still little known, and death and disease flourish. This is the case in + those eight countries which come at the bottom of both our lists. + </p> + <p> + Even in the more progressive countries, however, birth control has not + been established without a struggle, which has frequently ended in a + hypocritical compromise, its principles being publicly ignored or denied + and its practice privately accepted. For, at the great and vitally + important point in human progress which birth control represents, we + really see the conflict of two moralities. The morality of the ancient + world is here confronted by the morality of the new world. The old + morality, knowing nothing of science and the process of Nature as worked + out in the evolution of life, based itself on the early chapters of + Genesis, in which the children of Noah are represented as entering an + empty earth which it is their business to populate diligently. So it came + about that for this morality, still innocent of eugenics, recklessness was + almost a virtue. Children were given by God; if they died or were + afflicted by congenital disease, it was the dispensation of God, and, + whatever imprudence the parents might commit, the pathetic faith still + ruled that "God will provide." But in the new morality it is realised that + in these matters Divine action can only be made manifest in human action, + that is to say through the operation of our own enlightened reason and + resolved will. Prudence, foresight, self-restraint—virtues which the + old morality looked down on with benevolent contempt—assume a + position of the first importance. In the eyes of the new morality the + ideal woman is no longer the meek drudge condemned to endless and often + ineffectual child-bearing, but the free and instructed woman, able to look + before and after, trained in a sense of responsibility alike to herself + and to the race, and determined to have no children but the best. Such + were the two moralities which came into conflict during the nineteenth + century. They were irreconcilable and each firmly rooted, one in ancient + religion and tradition, the other in progressive science and reason. + Nothing was possible in such a clash of opposing ideas but a feeble and + confused compromise such as we still find prevailing in various countries + of Old Europe. It was not a satisfactory solution, however inevitable, and + especially unsatisfactory by the consequent obscurantism which placed + difficulties in the way of spreading a knowledge of the methods of birth + control among the masses of the population. For the result has been that + while the more enlightened and educated have exercised a control over the + size of their families, the poorer and more ignorant—who should have + been offered every facility and encouragement to follow in the same path—have + been left, through a conspiracy of secrecy, to carry on helplessly the bad + customs of their forefathers. This social neglect has had the result that + the superior family stocks have been hampered by the recklessness of the + inferior stocks. + </p> + <p> + We may see these two moralities in conflict to-day in America. Up till + recently America had meekly accepted at Old Europe's hands the traditional + prescription of our Mediterranean book of Genesis, with its fascinating + old-world fragrance of Mount Ararat. On the surface, the ancient morality + had been complacently, almost unquestionably, accepted in America, even to + the extent of permitting a vast extension of abortion—a criminal + practice which ever flourishes where birth-control is neglected. But + to-day we suddenly see a new movement in the United States. In a flash, + America has awakened to the true significance of the issue. With that + direct vision of hers, that swift practicality of action, and, above all, + that sense of the democratic nature of all social progress, we see her + resolutely beginning to face this great problem. In her own vigorous + native tongue we hear her demanding: "What in the thunder is all the + secrecy about, anyhow?" And we cannot doubt that America's own answer to + that demand will be of immense significance to the whole world. + </p> + <p> + Thus it is that as we get to the root of the matter the whole question + becomes clear. We see that there is really no standing ground in any + country for the panic-monger who bemoans the fall of the birth-rate and + storms against small families. The falling birth-rate is a world-wide + phenomenon in all countries that are striving toward a higher civilisation + along lines which Nature laid down from the beginning. We cannot stop it + if we would, and if we could we should merely be impeding civilisation. It + is a movement that rights itself and tends to reach a just balance. It has + not yet reached that balance with us in this country. That may be seen by + anyone who has read the letters from mothers lately published under the + title of <i>Maternity</i> by the Women's Co-operative Guild; there is + still far more misery caused by having too many babies than by having too + few; a bonus on babies would be a misfortune, alike for the parents and + the State—whether bestowed at birth as proposed in New Zealand, or + at the age of twelve months as proposed in France, or fourteen years as + proposed in England—unless it were confined to children who were not + merely alive at the appointed age, but able to pass examination as having + reached a definitely high standard. The falling birth-rate, which, it must + be remembered, is affecting all civilised countries, should be a matter + for joy rather than for grief. + </p> + <p> + But we need not therefore fold our hands and do nothing. There is still + much to be effected for the protection of Motherhood and the better care + of children. We cannot, and should not, attempt to increase the number of + children. But we may well attempt to work for their better quality. There + we shall be on very safe ground. More knowledge is necessary so that all + would-be parents may know how they may best become parents and how they + may, if necessary, best avoid it. Procreation by the unfit should be, if + not prohibited by law, at all events so discouraged by public opinion that + to attempt it would be counted disgraceful. Much greater public provision + is necessary for the care of mothers during the months before, as well as + during the period after, the child's birth. The system of Schools for + Mothers needs to be universalised and systematically carried out. Along + such lines as these we may hope to increase the happiness of the people + and the strength of the State. We need not worry over the falling + birth-rate. + </p> + <p> + [1] Those who wish to study the latest restatements of opinions in England + may be recommended to read the Report of the Commission of Inquiry into + Great Britain's falling birth-rate, appointed in 1913 by the National + Council of Public Morals, under the title of <i>The Declining Birth-rate: + Its Causes and Effects</i>, 1916. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0018" id="link2H_4_0018"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + XVIII — BIRTH CONTROL + </h2> + <h3> + I. + </h3> + <h3> + REPRODUCTION AND THE BIRTH-RATE + </h3> + <p> + The study of the questions relating to sex, so actively carried on during + recent years, has become more and more concentrated on to the practical + problems of marriage and the family. That was inevitable. It is only + reasonable that, with our growing scientific knowledge of the mysteries of + sex, we should seek to apply that knowledge to those questions of life + which we must ever regard as central. How can we add to the stability or + to the flexibility of marriage? How can we most judiciously regulate the + size of our families? + </p> + <p> + At the outset, however, we cannot too deeply impress upon our minds the + fact that these questions are not new in the world. If we try to find an + answer to them by confining our attention to the phenomena presented by + our own species, at our own particular moment of civilisation, it is very + likely indeed that we may fall into crude, superficial, even mischievous + conclusions. + </p> + <p> + The fact is that these questions, which are agitating us to-day, have + agitated the world ever since it has been a world of life at all. The + difference is that whereas we seek to deal with them consciously, + voluntarily, and deliberately, throughout by far the greater part of the + world's life they have been dealt with unconsciously, by methods of trial + and error, of perpetual experiment, which has often proved costly, but has + all the more clearly brought out the real course of natural progress. We + cannot solve problems so ancient and deeply rooted as those of sex by + merely rational methods which are only of yesterday. To be of value our + rational methods must be the revelation in deliberate consciousness of + unconscious methods which go far back into the remote past. Our conscious, + deliberate, and purposive methods, carried out on the plane of reason, + will not be sound unless they are a continuation of those methods which + have already, in the slow evolution of life, been found sound and + progressive on the plane of instinct. This must be borne in mind by those + people—always to be found among us, though not always on the side of + social advance—who desire their own line of conduct in matters of + sex to be so closely in accord with natural and Divine law that to + question it would be impious. + </p> + <p> + A medical friend of my own, when once in the dentist's chair under the + influence of nitrous oxide anaesthesia (a condition, as William James + showed, which frequently leads us to believe we are solving the problems + of the universe), imagined himself facing the Almighty and insistently + demanding the real object of the existence of the world. And the + Almighty's answer came in one word: "Reproduction." My friend is a man of + philosophic mind, and the solution of the mystery of the world's purpose + thus presented to him in vision may perhaps serve as a simple and ultimate + statement of the object of life. From the very outset the great object of + Nature to our human eyes seems to be primarily reproduction, in the long + run, indeed, an effort after economy of method in the attainment of an + ever greater perfection, but primarily reproduction. This tendency to + reproduction is indeed so fundamental, it is impressed on vital + organisation with so great a violence of emphasis, that we may regard the + course of evolution as much more an effort to slow down reproduction than + to furnish it with any new facilities. + </p> + <p> + We must remember that reproduction appears in the history of life before + sex appears. The lower forms of animal and plant life often reproduce + themselves without the aid of sex, and it has even been argued that + reproduction and sex are directly antagonistic, that active propagation is + always checked when sexual differentiation is established. "The impression + one gains of sexuality," remarks Professor Coulter, foremost of American + botanists, "is that it represents reproduction under peculiar + difficulties."[1] Bacteria among primitive plants and protozoa among + primitive animals are patterns of rapid and prolific reproduction, though + sex begins to appear in a rudimentary form in very lowly forms of life, + even among the protozoa, and is at first compatible with a high degree of + reproduction. A single infusorian becomes in a week the ancestor of + millions, that is to say, of far more individuals than could proceed under + the most favourable conditions from a pair of elephants in five centuries, + while Huxley calculated that the progeny of a single parthenogenetic + aphis, under favouring circumstances, would in a few months outweigh the + whole population of China.[2] That proviso—"under favouring + conditions"—is of great importance, for it reveals the weak point in + this early method of Nature's for conducting evolution by enormously rapid + multiplication. Creatures so easily produced could be, and were, easily + destroyed; no time had been spent on imparting to them the qualities that + would enable them to lead, what we should call in our own case, long and + useful lives. + </p> + <p> + Yet the method of rapid multiplication was not readily or speedily + abandoned by Nature. Still speaking in our human way, we may say that she + tried to give it every chance. Among insects that have advanced so far as + the white ants, we find that the queen lays eggs at an enormous rate + during the whole of her active life, according to some estimates at the + rate of 80,000 a day. Even in the more primitive members of the great + vertebrate group, to which we ourselves belong, reproduction is sometimes + still on almost as vast a scale as among lower organisms. Thus, among + herrings, nearly 70,000 eggs have been found in a single female; but the + herring, nevertheless, does not tend to increase in the seas, for it is + everywhere preyed upon by whales and seals and sharks and birds, and, not + least, by man. Thus early we see the connection between a high death-rate + and a high birth-rate. + </p> + <p> + The evidence against reckless reproduction at last, however, proved + overwhelming. With whatever hesitation, Nature finally decided, once and + for all, that it was better, from every point of view, to produce a few + superior beings than a vast number of inferior beings. For while the + primary end of Nature may be said to be reproduction, there is a secondary + end of scarcely less equal urgency, and that is evolution. In other words, + while Nature seems to our human eyes to be seeking after quantity, she is + also seeking, and with ever greater eagerness, after quality. Now the + method of rapid and easy reproduction, it had become clear, not only + failed of its own end, for the inferior creatures thus produced were + unable to maintain their position in life, but it was distinctly + unfavourable to any advance in quality. The method of sexual reproduction, + which had existed in a germinal form more or less from the beginning, + asserted itself ever more emphatically, and a method like that of + parthenogenesis, or reproduction by the female unaided by the male + (illustrated by the aphis), which had lingered on even beside sexual + reproduction, absolutely died out in higher evolution. Now the + fertilisation involved by the existence of two sexes is, as Weismann + insisted, simply an arrangement which renders possible the intermingling + of two different hereditary tendencies. The object of sex, that is to say, + is by no means to aid reproduction, but rather to subordinate and check + reproduction in order to evolve higher and more complex beings. Here we + come to the great principle, which Herbert Spencer developed at length in + his <i>Principles of Biology</i>, that, as he put it, Individuation and + Genesis vary inversely, whence it followed that advancing evolution must + be accompanied by declining fertility. Individuation, which means + complexity of structure, has advanced, as Genesis, the unrestricted + tendency to mere multiplication, has receded. This involves a diminished + number of offspring, but an increased amount of time and care in the + creation and breeding of each; it involves also that the reproductive life + of the organism is shortened and more or less confined to special periods; + it begins much later, it usually ends earlier, and even in its period of + activity it tends to fall into cycles. Nature, we see, who, at the outset, + had endowed her children so lavishly with the aptitude for multiplication, + grown wiser now, expends her fertile imagination in devising preventive + checks on reproduction for her children's use. + </p> + <p> + The result is that, though reproduction is greatly slackened, evolution is + greatly accelerated. The significance of sex, as Coulter puts it, "lies in + the fact that it makes organic evolution more rapid and far more varied." + It is scarcely necessary to emphasise that a highly important, and, + indeed, essential aspect of this greater individuation is a higher + survival value. The more complex and better equipped creature can meet and + subdue difficulties and dangers to which the more lowly organised creature + that came before—produced wholesale in a way which Nature seems now + to look back on as cheap and nasty—succumbed helplessly without an + effort. The idea of economy begins to assert itself in the world. It + became clear in the course of evolution that it is better to produce + really good and highly efficient organisms, at whatever cost, than to be + content with cheap production on a wholesale scale. They allowed greater + developmental progress to be made, and they lasted better. Even before man + began it was proved in the animal world that the death-rate falls as the + birth-rate falls. + </p> + <p> + If we wish to realise the vast progress in method which has been made, + even within the limits of the vertebrates to which we ourselves belong, we + have but to compare with the lowly herring, already cited, the highly + evolved elephant. The herring multiplies with enormous rapidity and on a + vast scale, and it possesses a very small brain, and is almost totally + unequipped to grapple with the special difficulties of its life, to which + it succumbs on a wholesale scale. A single elephant is carried for about + two years in his mother's womb, and is carefully guarded by her for many + years after birth; he possesses a large brain; his muscular system is as + remarkable for its delicacy as for its power and is guided by the most + sensitive perceptions. He is fully equipped for all the dangers of his + life, save for those which have been introduced by the subtle devilry of + modern man, and though a single pair of elephants produces so few + offspring, yet their high cost is justified, for each of them has a + reasonable chance of surviving to old age. The contrast from the point of + view of reproduction of the herring and the elephant, the low vertebrate + and the high vertebrate, well illustrates the tendency of evolution. It + clearly brings before us the difference between Nature's earlier and later + methods, the ever growing preference for quality of offspring over + quantity. + </p> + <p> + It has been necessary to touch on the wider aspects of reproduction in + Nature, even when our main concern is with particular aspects of + reproduction in man, for unless we understand the progressive tendency of + reproduction in Nature, we shall probably fail to understand it in man. + With these preliminary observations, we may now take up the question as it + affects man. + </p> + <p> + It is not easy to ascertain the exact tendencies of reproduction in our + own historical past or among the lower races of to-day. On the whole, it + seems fairly clear that, under ordinary savage and barbarous conditions, + rather more children are produced and rather more children die than among + ourselves; there is, in other words, a higher birth-rate and a higher + infantile death-rate.[3] A high birth-rate with a low death-rate seems to + have been even more exceptional than among ourselves, for under inelastic + social conditions the community cannot adjust itself to the rapid + expansion that would thus be rendered necessary. The community contracts, + as it were, on this expanding portion and largely crushes it out of life + by the forces of neglect, poverty, and disease.[4] The only part of Europe + in which we can to-day see how this works out on a large scale is Russia, + for here we find in an exaggerated form conditions, which once tended to + rule all over Europe, side by side with the beginnings of better things, + with scientific progress and statistical observation. Yet in Russia, up + till recently, if not even still, there has only been about one doctor to + every twelve thousand inhabitants, and the witch-doctor has flourished. + Small-pox, scarlet fever, diphtheria, typhoid, and syphilis also flourish, + and not only flourish, but show an enormously higher mortality than in + other European countries. More significant still, famine and typhus, the + special disease of filth and overcrowding and misery—both of them + banished, save in the most abnormal times, from the rest of Europe—have + in modern times ravaged Russia on a vast scale. Ignorance, superstition, + insanitation, filth, bad food, impure water, lead to a vast mortality + among children which has sometimes destroyed more than half of them before + they reach the age of five; so that, enormously high as the Russian + birth-rate is, the death-rate has sometimes exceeded it.[5] Nor is it + found, as some would-be sagacious persons confidently assert, that the + high birth-rate is justified by the better quality of the survivors. On + the contrary, there is a very large proportion of chronic and incurable + diseases among the survivors; blindness and other defects abound; and + though there are many very large and fine people in Russia, the average + stature of the Russians is lower than that of most European peoples.[6] + </p> + <p> + Russia is in the era of expanding industrialism—a fateful period for + any people, as we shall see directly—and the results resemble those + which followed, and to some extent exist still, further west. The workers, + whose hours often extended to twelve or fourteen, frequently had no homes + but slept in the factory itself, in the midst of the machinery, or in a + sort of dormitory above it, with a minimum of space and fresh air, men and + women promiscuously, on wooden shelves, one above the other, under the eye + of Government inspectors whose protests were powerless to effect any + change. This is, always and everywhere, even among so humane a people as + the Russians, the natural and inevitable result of a high birth-rate in an + era of expanding industrialism. Here is the goal of unrestricted + reproduction, the same among men as among herrings. This is the ideal of + those persons, whether they know it or not, who in their criminal rashness + would dare to arrest that fall in the birth-rate which is now beginning to + spread its beneficent influence in every civilised land. + </p> + <p> + We have no means of ascertaining precisely the birth-rate in Western + Europe before the nineteenth century, but the estimates of the population + which have been made by the help of various data indicate that the + increase during a century was very moderate. In England, for instance, + families scarcely seem to have been very large, and, even apart from wars, + many plagues and pestilences, during the eighteenth century more + especially small-pox, constantly devastated the population, so that, with + these checks on the results of reproduction, the population was able to + adjust itself to its very gradual expansion. The mortality fell heavily on + young children, as we observe in old family records, where we frequently + find two or even three children of the same Christian name, the first + child having died and its name been given to a successor. + </p> + <p> + During the last quarter of the eighteenth century, a new phase of social + life, profoundly affecting the reproductive habits of the community, made + its appearance in Western Europe, at first in England. This was the new + industrial era, due to the introduction of machinery. All the social + methods of gradual though awkward adaptation to a slow expansion were + dislocated. Easy expansion of population became a possibility, for + factories were constantly springing up, and "hands" were always in demand. + Moreover, these "hands" could be children for it was possible to tend + machinery at a very early age. The richest family was the family with most + children. The population began to expand rapidly. + </p> + <p> + It was an era of prosperity. But when it began to be realised what this + meant it was seen that such "prosperity" was far from an enviable + condition. A community cannot suddenly adjust itself to a sudden + expansion, still less can it adjust itself to a continuous rapid + expansion. Disease, misery, and poverty flourished in this prosperous new + industrial era. Filth and insanitation, immorality and crime, were + fostered by overcrowding in ill-built urban areas. Ignorance and stupidity + abounded, for the child, placed in the monotonous routine of the factory + when little more than an infant, was deprived alike of the education of + the school and of the world. Higher wages brought no higher refinement and + were squandered on food and drink, on the lowest vulgar tastes. Such + "prosperity" was merely a brutalising influence; it meant nothing for the + growth of civilisation and humanity. + </p> + <p> + Then a wholesome movement of reaction set in. The betterment of the + environment—that was the great task that social pioneers and + reformers saw before them. They courageously set about the herculean task + of cleansing this Augean stable of "Prosperity." The era of sanitation + began. The endless and highly beneficent course of factory legislature was + inaugurated.[7] + </p> + <p> + That is the era which, in every progressive country of the world, we are + living in still. The final tendency of it, however, was not foreseen by + its great pioneers, or even its humble day-labourers of the present time. + For they were not attacking reproduction; they were fighting against bad + conditions, and may even have thought that they were enabling reproduction + to expand more freely. They had not realised that to improve the + environment is to check reproduction, being indeed the one and only way in + which undue reproduction can be checked. That may be said to be an aspect + of the opposition between Genesis and Individuation, on which Herbert + Spencer insisted, for by improving the environment we necessarily improve + the individual who is rooted in that environment. It is not, we must + remember, a matter of conscious and voluntary action. That is clearly + manifest by the fact that it occurs even among the most primitive + micro-organisms; when placed under unfavourable conditions as to food and + environment they tend to pass into a reproductive phase and by sporulation + or otherwise begin to produce new individuals rapidly. It is the same in + Man. Improve the environment and reproduction is checked.[8] That is, as + Professor Benjamin Moore has said, "the simple biological reply to good + economic conditions." It is only among the poor, the ignorant, and the + wretched that reproduction flourishes. "The tendency of civilisation," as + Leroy-Beaulieu concludes, "is to reduce the birth-rate." Those who desire + a high birth-rate are desiring, whether they know it or not, the increase + of poverty, ignorance, and wretchedness. + </p> + <p> + So far we have been dealing with fundamental laws and tendencies, which + were established long before Man appeared on the earth, although Man has + often illustrated, and still illustrates, their inevitable character. We + have not been brought in contact with the influence of conscious design + and deliberate intention. At this point we reach a totally new aspect of + reproduction. + </p> + <h3> + II. + </h3> + <h3> + THE ORIGIN AND RESULTS OF BIRTH CONTROL + </h3> + <p> + In tracing the course of reproduction we have so far been concerned with + what are commonly considered the blind operations of Nature in the absence + of conscious and deliberate volition. We have seen that while at the + outset Nature seems to have impressed an immense reproductive impetus on + her creatures, all her energy since has been directed to the imposition of + preventive checks on that reproductive impetus. The end attained by these + checks has been an extreme diminution in the number of offspring, a + prolongation of the time devoted to the breeding and care of each new + member of the family, in harmony with its greatly prolonged life, a + spacing out of the intervals between the offspring, and, as a result, a + vastly greater development of each individual and an ever better equipment + for the task of living. All this was slowly attained automatically, + without any conscious volition on the part of the individuals, even when + they were human beings, who were the agents. Now occurred a change which + we may regard as, in some respects, the most momentous sudden advance in + the whole history of reproduction: the process of reproductive progress + became conscious and deliberately volitional. + </p> + <p> + We often fancy that when natural progress becomes manifested in the mind + and will of man it is somehow unnatural. It is one of the wisest of + Shakespeare's utterances in one of the most mature of his plays that + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + "Nature is made better by no mean + But Nature makes that mean ... + This is an art + Which does mend Nature, change it rather, but + The art itself is Nature." +</pre> + <p> + Birth control, when it ceases to be automatic and becomes conscious, is an + art. But it is an art directed precisely to the attainment of ends which + Nature has been struggling after for millions of years, and, being + consciously and deliberately an art, it is enabled to avoid many of the + pitfalls which the unconscious method falls into. It is an art, but + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + "The art itself is Nature." +</pre> + <p> + It is always possible for the narrow-eyed fanatic to object to the + employment of birth control, precisely as he might object to the use of + clothes, as "unnatural." But, if we look more deeply into the matter, we + see that even clothes are not truly unnatural. A vast number of creatures + may be said to be born in clothes, clothes so naturally such that, when + stripped from the animals they belong to, we are proud to wear them + ourselves. Even our own ancestors were born in clothes, which they lost by + the combined or separate action of natural selection, sexual selection, + and the environment, which action, however, has not sufficed to abolish + the desirability of clothes.[9] So that the impulse by which we make for + ourselves clothes is merely a conscious and volitional form of an impulse + which, in the absence of consciousness and will, had acted automatically. + It is just the same with the control and limitation of reproductive + activity. It is an attempt by open-eyed intelligence and foresight to + attain those ends which Nature through untold generations has been + painfully yet tirelessly struggling for. The deliberate co-operation of + Man in the natural task of birth-control represents an identification of + the human will with what we may, if we choose, regard as the divinely + appointed law of the world. We can well believe that the great pioneers + who, a century ago, acted in the spirit of this faith may have echoed the + thought of Kepler when, on discovering his great planetary law, he + exclaimed in rapture: "O God! I think Thy thoughts after Thee." + </p> + <p> + As a matter of fact, however, it was in no such spirit of ecstasy that the + pioneers of the movement for birth control acted. The Divine command is + less likely to be heard in the whirlwind than in the still small voice. + These great pioneers were thoughtful, cautious, hard-headed men, who spoke + scarcely above a whisper, and were far too modest to realise that a great + forward movement in natural evolution had in them begun to be manifested. + Early man could not have taken this step because it is even doubtful + whether he knew that the conjunction of the sexes had anything to do with + the production of offspring, which he was inclined to attribute to magical + causes. Later, although intelligence grew, the uncontrolled rule of the + sexual impulse obtained so firm a grip on men that they laughed at the + idea that it was possible to exercise forethought and prudence in this + sphere; at the same time religion and superstition came into action to + preserve the established tradition and to persuade people that it would be + wicked to do anything different from what they had always done. But a + saner feeling was awakening here and there, in various parts of the world. + At last, under the stress of the devastation and misery caused by the + reproductive relapse of the industrial era, this feeling, voiced by a few + distinguished men, began to take shape in action. + </p> + <p> + The pioneers were English. Among them Malthus occupies the first place. + That distinguished man, in his great and influential work, <i>The + Principle of Population</i>, in 1798, emphasised the immense importance of + foresight and self-control in procreation, and the profound significance + of birth limitation for human welfare. Malthus relied, however, on ascetic + self-restraint, a method which could only appeal to the few; he had + nothing to say for the prevention of conception in intercourse. That was + suggested, twenty years later, very cautiously by James Mill, the father + of John Stuart Mill, in the <i>Encyclopedia Britannica</i>. Four years + afterwards, Mill's friend, the Radical reformer, Francis Place, advocated + this method more clearly. Finally, in 1831, Robert Dale Owen, the son of + the great Robert Owen, published his <i>Moral Physiology</i>, in which he + set forth the ways of preventing conception; while a little later the + Drysdale brothers, ardent and unwearying philanthropists, devoted their + energies to a propaganda which has been spreading ever since and has now + conquered the whole civilised world. + </p> + <p> + It was not, however, in England but in France, so often at the head of an + advance in civilisation, that birth control first became firmly + established, and that the extravagantly high birth-rate of earlier times + began to fall; this happened in the first half of the nineteenth century, + whether or not it was mainly due to voluntary control.[10] In England the + movement came later, and the steady decline in the English birth-rate, + which is still proceeding, began in 1877. In the previous year there had + been a famous prosecution of Bradlaugh and Mrs. Besant for disseminating + pamphlets describing the methods of preventing conception; the charge was + described by the Lord Chief Justice, who tried the case, as one of the + most ill-advised and injudicious ever made in a court of justice. But it + served an undesigned end by giving enormous publicity to the subject and + advertising the methods it sought to suppress. There can be no doubt, + however, that even apart from this trial the movement would have proceeded + on the same lines. The times were ripe, the great industrial expansion had + passed its first feverish phase, social conditions were improving, + education was spreading. The inevitable character of the movement is + indicated by the fact that at the very same time it began to be manifested + all over Europe, indeed in every civilised country of the world. At the + present time the birth-rate (as well as usually the death-rate) is falling + in every country of the world sufficiently civilised to possess statistics + of its own vital movement. The fall varies in rapidity. It has been + considerable in the more progressive countries; it has lingered in the + more backward countries. If we examine the latest statistics for Europe + (usually those for 1913) we find that every country, without exception, + with a progressive and educated population, and a fairly high state of + social well-being, presents a birth-rate below 30 per 1,000. We also find + that every country in Europe in which the mass of the people are + primitive, ignorant, or in a socially unsatisfactory condition (even + although the governing classes may be progressive or ambitious) shows a + birth-rate above 30 per 1,000. France, Great Britain, Belgium, Holland, + the Scandinavian countries and Switzerland are in the first group. Russia, + Austro-Hungary, Italy, Spain and the Balkan countries are in the second + group. The German Empire was formerly in this second group but now comes + within the first group, and has carried on the movement so energetically + that the birth-rate of Berlin is already below that of London, and that at + the present rate of decline the birth-rate of the German Empire will + before long sink to that of France. Outside Europe, in the United States + just as much as in Australia and New Zealand, the same great progressive + movement is proceeding with equal activity. + </p> + <p> + The wide survey of the question of birth limitation here taken may seem to + some readers unnecessary. Why not get at once to matters of practical + detail? But, if we think of it, our wide survey has been of the greatest + practical help to us. It has, for instance, settled the question of the + desirability of the adoption of methods of preventing conception and + finally silenced those who would waste our time with their fears lest it + is not right to control conception. We know now on whose side are the laws + of God and Nature. We realise that in exercising control over the entrance + gate of life we are not only performing, consciously and deliberately, a + great human duty, but carrying on rationally a beneficial process which + has, more blindly and wastefully, been carried on since the beginning of + the world. There are still a few persons ignorant enough or foolish enough + to fight against the advance of civilisation in this matter; we can well + afford to leave them severely alone, knowing that in a few years all of + them will have passed away. It is not our business to defend the control + of birth, but simply to discuss how we may most wisely exercise that + control. + </p> + <p> + Many ways of preventing conception have been devised since the method + which is still the commonest was first introduced, so far as our certainly + imperfect knowledge extends, by a clever Jew, Onan (<i>Genesis</i>, Chap. + XXXVIII), whose name has since been wrongly attached to another practice + with which the Mosaic record in no way associates him. There are now many + contraceptive methods, some dependent on precautions adopted by the man, + others dependent on the woman, others again which take the form of an + operation permanently preventing conception, and, therefore, not to be + adopted save by couples who already have as many children as they desire, + or else who ought never to have children at all and thus wisely adopt a + method of sterilisation. It is unnecessary here, even if it were otherwise + desirable, to discuss these various methods in detail. It is even useless + to do so, for we must bear in mind that no method can be absolutely + approved or absolutely condemned. Each may be suitable under certain + conditions and for certain couples, and it is not easy to recommend any + method indiscriminately. We need to know the intimate circumstances of + individual cases. For the most part, experience is the final test. Forel + compared the use of contraceptive devices to the use of eyeglasses, and it + is obvious that, without expert advice, the results in either case may + sometimes be mischievous or at all events ineffective. Personal advice and + instruction are always desirable. In Holland nurses are medically trained + in a practical knowledge of contraceptive methods, and are thus enabled to + enlighten the women of the community. This is an admirable plan. + Considering that the use of contraceptive measures is now almost + universal, it is astonishing that there are yet so many so-called + "civilised" countries in which this method of enlightenment is not + everywhere adopted. Until it is adopted, and a necessary knowledge of the + most fundamental facts of the sexual life brought into every home, the + physician must be regarded as the proper adviser. It is true that until + recently he was generally in these matters a blind leader of the blind. + Nowadays it is beginning to be recognised that the physician has no more + serious and responsible duty than that of giving help in the difficult + path of the sexual life. Very frequently, indeed, even yet, he has not + risen to a sense of his responsibilities in this matter. It is as well to + remember, however, that a physician who is unable or unwilling to give + frank and sound advice in this most important department of life, is + unlikely to be reliable in any other department. If he is not up to date + here he is probably not up to date anywhere. + </p> + <p> + Whatever the method adopted, there are certain conditions which it must + fulfil, even apart from its effectiveness as a contraceptive, in order to + be satisfactory. Most of these conditions may be summed up in one: the + most satisfactory method is that which least interferes with the normal + process of the act of intercourse. Every sexual act is, or should be, a + miniature courtship, however long marriage may have lasted.[11] No outside + mental tension or nervous apprehension must be allowed to intrude. Any + contraceptive proceeding which hastily enters the atmosphere of love + immediately before or immediately after the moment of union is + unsatisfactory and may be injurious. It even risks the total loss of the + contraceptive result, for at such moments the intended method may be + ineffectively carried out, or neglected altogether. No method can be + regarded as desirable which interferes with the sense of satisfaction and + relief which should follow the supreme act of loving union. No method + which produces a nervous jar in one of the parties, even though it may be + satisfactory to the other, should be tolerated. Such considerations must + for some couples rule out certain methods. We cannot, however, lay down + absolute rules, because methods which some couples may find satisfactory + prove unsatisfactory in other cases. Experience, aided by expert advice, + is the only final criterion. + </p> + <p> + When a contraceptive method is adopted under satisfactory conditions, with + a due regard to the requirements of the individual couple, there is little + room to fear that any injurious results will be occasioned. It is quite + true that many physicians speak emphatically concerning the injurious + results to husband or to wife of contraceptive devices. Although there has + been exaggeration, and prejudice has often been imported into this + question, and although most of the injurious results could have been + avoided had trained medical help been at hand to advise better methods, + there can be no doubt that much that has been said under this head is + true. Considering how widespread is the use of these methods, and how + ignorantly they have often been carried out, it would be surprising indeed + if it were not true. But even supposing that the nervously injurious + effects which have been traced to contraceptive practices were a + thousandfold greater than they have been reported to be—instead of, + as we are justified in believing, considerably less than they are reported—shall + we therefore condemn contraceptive methods? To do so would be to ignore + all the vastly greater evils which have followed in the past from + unchecked reproduction. It would be a condemnation which, if we exercised + it consistently, would destroy the whole of civilisation and place us back + in savagery. For what device of man, since man had any history at all, has + not proved sometimes injurious? + </p> + <p> + Every one of even the most useful and beneficent of human inventions has + either exercised subtle injuries or produced appalling catastrophes. This + is not only true of man's devices, it is true of Nature's in general. Let + us take, for instance, the elevation of man's ancestors from the + quadrupedal to the bipedal position. The experiment of making a series of + four-footed animals walk on their hind-legs was very revolutionary and + risky; it was far, far more beset by dangers than is the introduction of + contraceptives; we are still suffering all sorts of serious evils in + consequence of Nature's action in placing our remote ancestors in the + erect position. Yet we feel that it was worth while; even those physicians + who most emphasise the evil results of the erect position do not advise + that we should go on all-fours. It is just the same with a great human + device, the introduction of clothes. They have led to all sorts of new + susceptibilities to disease and even tendencies to direct injury of many + kinds. Yet no one advocates the complete disuse of all clothing on the + ground that corsets have sometimes proved harmful. It would be just as + absurd to advocate the complete abandonment of contraceptives on the + ground that some of them have sometimes been misused. If it were not, + indeed, that we are familiar with the lengths to which ignorance and + prejudice may go we should question the sanity of anyone who put forward + so foolish a proposition. Every great step which Nature and man have taken + in the path of progress has been beset by dangers which are gladly risked + because of the advantages involved. We have still to enumerate some of the + immense advantages which Man has gained in acquiring a conscious and + deliberate control of reproduction. + </p> + <h3> + III. + </h3> + <h3> + BIRTH CONTROL IN RELATION TO MORALITY AND EUGENICS + </h3> + <p> + Anyone who has followed this discussion so far will not easily believe + that a tendency so deeply rooted in Nature as Birth Control can ever be in + opposition to Morality. It can only seem to be so when we confuse the + eternal principles of Morality, whatever they may be, with their temporary + applications, which are always becoming modified in adaptation to changing + circumstances. + </p> + <p> + We are often in danger of doing injustice to the morality of the past, and + it is important, even in order to understand the morality of the present, + that we should be able to put ourselves in the place of those for whom + birth control was immoral. To speak of birth control as having been + immoral in the past is, indeed, to underestimate the case; it was not only + immoral, it was unnatural, it was even irreligious, it was almost + criminal. We must remember that throughout the Christian world the Divine + Command, "Increase and Multiply," has seemed to echo down the ages from + the beginning of the world. It was the authoritative command of a tribal + God who was, according to the scriptural narrative, addressing a world + inhabited by eight people. From such a point of view a world's population + of several thousand persons would have seemed inconceivably vast, though + to-day by even the most austere advocate of birth limitation it would be + allowed with a smile. But the old religious command has become a tradition + which has survived amid conditions totally unlike those under which it + arose. In comparatively modern times it has been reinforced from + unexpected quarters, on the one hand by all the forces that are opposed to + democracy and on the other by all the forces of would-be patriotic + militarism, both alike clamouring for plentiful and cheap men. + </p> + <p> + Even science, under primitive conditions, was opposed to Birth Control. + Creation was regarded as a direct process in which man's will had no part, + and knowledge of nature was still too imperfect for the recognition of the + fact that the whole course of the world's natural history has been an + erection of barriers against wholesale and indiscriminate reproduction. + Thus it came about that under the old dispensation, which is now for ever + passing away, to have as many children as possible and to have them as + often as possible—provided certain ritual prescriptions were + fulfilled—seemed to be a religious, moral, natural, scientific, and + patriotic duty. + </p> + <p> + To-day the conditions have altogether altered, and even our own feelings + have altered. We no longer feel with the ancient Hebrew who has bequeathed + his ideals though not his practices to Christendom, that to have as many + wives and concubines and as large a family as possible is both natural and + virtuous, as well as profitable. We realise, moreover, that the Divine + Commands, so far as we recognise any such commands, are not external to + us, but are manifested in our own deliberate reason and will. We know that + to primitive men, who lacked foresight and lived mainly in the present, + only that Divine Command could be recognisable which sanctified the + impulse of the moment, while to us, who live largely in the future, and + have learnt foresight, the Divine Command involves restraint on the + impulse of the moment. We no longer believe that we are divinely ordered + to be reckless or that God commands us to have children who, as we + ourselves know, are fatally condemned to disease or premature death. + Providence, which was once regarded as the attribute of God, we regard as + the attribute of men; providence, prudence, self-restraint—these are + to us the characteristics of moral men, and those persons who lack these + characteristics are condemned by our social order to be reckoned among the + dregs of mankind. It is a social order which in the sphere of procreation + could not be reached or maintained except by the systematic control of + offspring. + </p> + <p> + We may realise the difference between the morality of to-day and the + morality of the past when we come to details. We may consider, for + instance, the question of the chastity of women. According to the ideas of + the old morality, which placed the whole question of procreation under the + authority (after God) of men, women were in subjection to men, and had no + right to freedom, no right to responsibility, no right to knowledge, for, + it was believed, if entrusted with any of these they would abuse them at + once. That view prevails even to-day in some civilised countries, and + middle-class Italian parents, for instance, will not allow their daughter + to be conducted by a man even to Mass, for they believe that as soon as + she is out of their sight she will be unchaste. That is their morality. + Our morality to-day, however, is inspired by different ideas, and aims at + a different practice. We are by no means disposed to rate highly the + morality of a girl who is only chaste so long as she is under her parents' + eyes; for us, indeed, that is much more like immorality than morality. We + are to-day vigorously pursuing a totally different line of action. We wish + women to be reasonably free, we wish them to be trained in the sense of + responsibility for their own actions, we wish them to possess knowledge, + more especially in that sphere of sex, once theoretically closed to them, + which we now recognise as peculiarly their own domain. Nowadays, moreover, + we are sufficiently well acquainted with human nature to know, not only + that at best the "chastity" merely due to compulsion or to ignorance is a + poor thing, but that at worst it is really the most degraded and injurious + form of unchastity. For there are many ways of avoiding pregnancy besides + the use of contraceptives, and such ways can often only be called vicious, + destructive to purity, and harmful to health. Our ideal woman to-day is + not she who is deprived of freedom and knowledge in the cloister, even + though only the cloister of her home, but the woman who, being instructed + from early life in the facts of sexual physiology and sexual hygiene, is + also trained in the exercise of freedom and self-responsibility, and able + to be trusted to choose and to follow the path which seems to her right. + That is the only kind of morality which seems to us real and worth while. + And, in any case, we have now grown wise enough to know that no degree of + compulsion and no depth of ignorance will suffice to make a girl good if + she doesn't want to be good. So that, even as a matter of policy, it is + better to put her in a position to know what is good and to act in + accordance with that knowledge. + </p> + <p> + The relation of birth control to morality is, however, by no means a + question which concerns women alone. It equally concerns men. Here we have + to recognise, not only that the exercise of control over procreation + enables a man to form a union of faithful devotion with the woman of his + choice at an earlier age than would otherwise be possible, but it further + enables him, throughout the whole of married life, to continue such + relationship under circumstances which might otherwise render them + injurious or else undesirable to his wife. That the influence thus exerted + by preventive methods would suffice to abolish prostitution it would be + foolish to maintain, for prostitution has other grounds of support. But + even within the sphere of merely prostitutional relationships the use of + contraceptives, and the precautions and cleanliness they involve, have an + influence of their own in diminishing the risks of venereal disease, and + while the interests of those who engage in prostitution are by some + persons regarded as negligible, we must always remember that venereal + disease spreads far beyond the patrons of prostitution and is a perpetual + menace to others who may become altogether innocent victims. So that any + influence which tends to diminish venereal disease increases the + well-being of the whole community. + </p> + <p> + Apart from the relationship to morality, although the two are intimately + combined, we are thus led to the relationship of birth control to + eugenics, or to the sound breeding of the race. Here we touch the highest + ground, and are concerned with our best hopes for the future of the world. + For there can be no doubt that birth control is not only a precious but an + indispensable instrument in moulding the coming man to the measure of our + developing ideals. Without it we are powerless in the face of the awful + evils which flow from random and reckless reproduction. With it we possess + a power so great that some persons have professed to see in it a menace to + the propagation of the race, amusing themselves with the idea that if + people possess the means to prevent the conception of children they will + never have children at all. It is not necessary to discuss such a + grotesque notion seriously. The desire for children is far too deeply + implanted in mankind and womankind alike ever to be rooted out. If there + are to-day many parents whose lives are rendered wretched by large + families and the miseries of excessive child-bearing, there are an equal + number whose lives are wretched because they have no children at all, and + who snatch eagerly at any straw which offers the smallest promise of + relief to this craving. Certainly there are people who desire marriage, + but—some for very sound and estimable reasons and others for reasons + which may less well bear examination—do not desire any children at + all. So far as these are concerned, contraceptive methods, far from being + a social evil, are a social blessing. For nothing is so certain as that it + is an unmixed evil for a community to possess unwilling, undesirable, or + incompetent parents. Birth control would be an unmixed blessing if it + merely enabled us to exclude such persons from the ranks of parenthood. We + desire no parents who are not both competent and willing parents. Only + such parents are fit to father and to mother a future race worthy to rule + the world. + </p> + <p> + It is sometimes said that the control of conception, since it is + frequently carried out immediately on marriage, will tend to delay + parenthood until an unduly late age. Birth control has, however, no + necessary result of this kind, and might even act in the reverse + direction. A chief cause of delay in marriage is the prospect of the + burden and expense of an unrestricted flow of children into the family, + and in Great Britain, since 1911, with the extension of the use of + contraceptives, there has been a slight but regular increase not only in + the general marriage rate but in the proportion of early marriages, + although the <i>general</i> mean age at marriage has increased. The + ability to control the number of children not only enables marriage to + take place at an early age but also makes it possible for the couple to + have at least one child soon after marriage. The total number of children + are thus spaced out, instead of following in rapid succession. + </p> + <p> + It is only of recent years that the eugenic importance of a considerable + interval between births has been fully recognised, as regards not only the + mother—this has long been realised—but also the children. The + very high mortality of large families has long been known, and their + association with degenerate conditions and with criminality. The children + of small families in Toronto, Canada, are taller than those of larger + families, as is also the case in Oakland, California, where the average + size of the family is smaller than in Toronto.[12] Of recent years, + moreover, evidence has been obtained that families in which the children + are separated from each other by intervals of more than two years are both + mentally and physically superior to those in which the interval is + shorter. Thus Ewart found in a northern English manufacturing town that + children born at an interval of less than two years after the birth of the + previous child remain notably defective, even at the age of six, both as + regards intelligence and physical development. When compared with children + born at a longer interval and with first-born children, they are, on the + average, three inches shorter and three pounds lighter than first-born + children.[13] Such observations need to be repeated in various countries, + but if confirmed it is obvious that they represent a fact of the most + vital significance. + </p> + <p> + Thus when we calmly survey, in however summary a manner, the great field + of life affected by the establishment of voluntary human control over the + production of the race, we can see no cause for anything but hope. It is + satisfactory that it should be so, for there can be no doubt that we are + here facing a great and permanent fact in civilised life. With every rise + in civilisation, indeed with all evolutionary progress whatever, there is + what seems to be an automatic fall in the birth-rate. That fall is always + normally accompanied by a fall in the death-rate, so that a low birth-rate + frequently means a high rate of natural increase, since most of the + children born survive.[14] Thus in the civilised world of to-day, + notwithstanding the low birth-rate which prevails as compared with earlier + times, the rate of increase in the population is still, as Leroy-Beaulieu + points out, appalling, nearly half a million a year in Great Britain, over + half a million in Austro-Hungary, and three-quarters of a million in + Germany. When we examine this excess of births in detail we find among + them a large proportion of undesired and undesirable children. There are + two opposed alternative methods working to diminish this proportion: the + method of preventing conception, with which we have here been concerned, + and the method of preventing live birth by producing abortion. There can + be no doubt about the enormous extension of this latter practice in all + civilised countries, even although some of the estimates of its frequency + in the United States, where it seems especially to flourish, may be + extravagant. The burden of excessive children on the overworked underfed + mothers of the working classes becomes at last so intolerable that + anything seems better than another child. "I'd rather swallow the + druggist's shop and the man in it than have another kid," as, Miss + Elderton reports, a woman in Yorkshire said.[15] + </p> + <p> + Now there has of late years arisen a movement, especially among German + women, for bringing abortion into honour and repute, so that it may be + carried out openly and with the aid of the best physicians. This movement + has been supported by lawyers and social reformers of high position. It + may be admitted that women have an abstract right to abortion and that in + exceptional cases that right should be exerted. Yet there can be very + little doubt to most people that abortion is a wasteful, injurious, and + almost degrading method of dealing with the birth-rate, a feeble apology + for recklessness and improvidence. A society in which abortion flourishes + cannot be regarded as a healthy society. Therefore, a community which + takes upon itself to encourage abortion is incurring a heavy + responsibility. I am referring more especially to the United States, where + this condition of things is most marked. For, there cannot be any doubt + about it, just as all those who work for birth control are diminishing the + frequency of abortion, so <i>every attempt to discourage birth control + promotes abortion</i>. We have to approach this problem calmly, in the + light of Nature and reason. We have each of us to decide on which side we + shall range ourselves. For it is a vital social problem concerning which + we cannot afford to be indifferent. + </p> + <p> + There is here no desire to exaggerate the importance of birth control. It + is not a royal road to the millennium, and, as I have already pointed out, + like all other measures which the course of progress forces us to adopt, + it has its disadvantages. Yet at the present moment its real and vital + significance is acutely brought home to us. + </p> + <p> + Flinders Petrie, discussing those great migrations due to the unrestricted + expansion of barbarous races which have devastated Europe from the dawn of + history, remarks: "We deal lightly and coldly with the abstract facts, but + they represent the most terrible tragedies of all humanity—the wreck + of the whole system of civilisation, protracted starvation, wholesale + massacre. Can it be avoided? That is the question, before all others, to + the statesman who looks beyond the present time."[16] Since Petrie wrote, + only ten years ago, we have had occasion to realise that the vast + expansions which he described are not confined to the remote past, but are + at work and producing the same awful results, even at the very present + hour. The great and only legitimate apology which has been put forward for + the aggressive attitude of Germany in the present war has been that it was + the inevitable expansive outcome of the abnormally high birth-rate of + Germany in recent times; as Dr. Dernburg, not long ago, put it: "The + expansion of the German nation has been so extraordinary during the last + twenty-five years that the conditions existing before the war had become + insupportable." In other words, there was no outlet but a devastating war. + So we are called upon to repeat, with fresh emphasis, Petrie's question: + <i>Can it be avoided</i>? All humanity, all civilisation, call upon us to + take up our stand on this vital question of birth control. In so doing we + shall each of us be contributing, however humbly, to + </p> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + "one far-off divine event, + To which the whole creation moves." +</pre> + <p> + [1] J.M. Coulter, <i>The Evolution of Sex in Plants</i>, 1915; Geoffrey + Smith, "The Biology of Sex," <i>Eugenics Review</i>, April, 1914. + </p> + <p> + [2] See, <i>e.g.</i>, Geddes and Thomson, <i>The Evolution of Sex</i>, Ch. + XX.; and T.H. Morgan, <i>Heredity and Sex</i>, Ch. I. + </p> + <p> + [3] To quote one of the most careful investigators of this point, + Northcote Thomas, among the Edo-speaking people of Nigeria, found that the + average number of living children per husband was 2.7; including all + children, alive and dead, the average number was per husband 4.5, and per + wife 2.7. "Infant mortality is heavy" (Northcote Thomas, <i>Anthropological + Report of Edo-speaking People of Nigeria</i>, 1910, Part I., pp. 15, 63). + </p> + <p> + [4] The same end has been rather more mercifully achieved in earlier + periods by infanticide (see Westermarck, <i>Origin and Development of the + Moral Ideas</i>, Vol. I., Ch. 17). It must not be supposed that + infanticide was opposed to tenderness to children. Thus the Australian + Dieyerie, who practised infanticide, were kind to children, and a mother + found beating her child was herself beaten by her husband. + </p> + <p> + [5] See Havelock Ellis, <i>The Nationalisation of Health</i>. + </p> + <p> + [6] Similar results appear to follow in China where also the birth-rate is + very high and the mortality very great. It is stated that physical + development is much inferior and pathological defects more numerous among + Chinese as compared with American students. (<i>New York Medical Journal</i>, + Nov. 14th, 1914, p. 978.) The bad conditions which produce death in the + weakest produce deterioration in the survivors. + </p> + <p> + [7] The law is thus laid down by P. Leroy-Beaulieu (<i>La Question de la + Population</i>, 1913, p. 233): "The first degree of prosperity in a rude + population with few needs develops prolificness; a later degree of + prosperity, accompanied by all the feelings and ideas stimulated by the + development of education and a democratic environment, leads to a gradual + reduction of prolificness." + </p> + <p> + [8] This is too often forgotten. Birth control is a natural process, and + though in civilised men, endowed with high intelligence, it necessarily + works in some measure voluntarily and deliberately, it is probable that it + still also works, as in the evolution of the lower animals, to some extent + automatically. Sir Shirley Murphy (<i>Lancet</i>, Aug. 10th, 1912), while + admitting that intentional restriction has been operative, remarks: "It + does not appear to me that there is any more reason for ignoring the + likelihood that Nature has been largely concerned in the reduction of + births than for ignoring the effects of Nature in reducing the death-rate. + The decline in both has points of resemblance. Both have been widely + manifest over Europe, both have in the main declined in the period of + 1871-1880, and indeed both appear to be behaving in like manner." + </p> + <p> + [9] I do not overlook the fact that the artificial clothing of primitive + man is in its origin mainly ornament, having myself insisted on that fact + in discussing this point in "The Evolution of Modesty" (<i>Studies in the + Psychology of Sex</i>, Vol. I.). It is to be remembered that, in animals—and + very conspicuously, for instance, in birds—natural clothing is also + largely ornament of secondary sexual significance. + </p> + <p> + [10] At the end of the eighteenth century there were in France four + children on the average to a family; a movement of rapid increase in the + population reached its climax in 1846; by 1860 the average number of + children to a family had slowly fallen to but little over three. Broca, + writing in 1867 ("Sur la Prétendue Dégénérescence de la Population + Francaise"), mentioned that the slow fall in the birth-rate was only + slightly due to prudent calculation and mainly to more general causes such + as delay in marriage. + </p> + <p> + [11] Havelock Ellis, <i>Studies in the Psychology of Sex</i>, Vol. VI., + "Sex in Relation to Society," Ch. XI., The Art of Love. + </p> + <p> + [12] The exact results are presented by F. Boas (abstract of Report on <i>Changes + in Bodily Form of Descendants of Immigrants</i>, Washington, 1911, p. 57), + who concludes that "the physical development of children, as measured by + stature, is the better the smaller the family." + </p> + <p> + [13] R.J. Ewart, "The Influence of Parental Age on Offspring," <i>Eugenics + Review</i>, Oct., 1911. + </p> + <p> + [14] In New Zealand the birth-rate is very low; but the death-rate of + children in the first year is only 58 per thousand as against 130 in + England. + </p> + <p> + [15] E.M. Elderton, <i>Report on the English Birth-rate</i>, Part I., + 1914. See also the collection of narratives of their experiences by + working-class mothers, published under the title of <i>Maternity</i> + (Women's Co-operative Guild, 1915). + </p> + <p> + [16] Flinders Petrie, <i>Journal of the Anthropological Institute</i>, + 1906, p. 220. + </p> + <div style="height: 6em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> +<pre xml:space="preserve"> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Essays in War-Time, by Havelock Ellis + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ESSAYS IN WAR-TIME *** + +***** This file should be named 9887-h.htm or 9887-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + https://www.gutenberg.org/9/8/8/9887/ + +Etext produced by Eric Eldred, Beth Trapaga and PG Distributed Proofreaders + +HTML file produced by David Widger + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at +https://gutenberg.org/license). + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTIBILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation web page at https://www.pglaf.org. + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at +https://pglaf.org/fundraising. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at +809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email +business@pglaf.org. Email contact links and up to date contact +information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official +page at https://pglaf.org + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit https://pglaf.org + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including including checks, online payments and credit card +donations. To donate, please visit: https://pglaf.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + https://www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + +</pre> + </body> +</html> |