1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1006
1007
1008
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1021
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1029
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1046
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1052
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
1060
1061
1062
1063
1064
1065
1066
1067
1068
1069
1070
1071
1072
1073
1074
1075
1076
1077
1078
1079
1080
1081
1082
1083
1084
1085
1086
1087
1088
1089
1090
1091
1092
1093
1094
1095
1096
1097
1098
1099
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1160
1161
1162
1163
1164
1165
1166
1167
1168
1169
1170
1171
1172
1173
1174
1175
1176
1177
1178
1179
1180
1181
1182
1183
1184
1185
1186
1187
1188
1189
1190
1191
1192
1193
1194
1195
1196
1197
1198
1199
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1260
1261
1262
1263
1264
1265
1266
1267
1268
1269
1270
1271
1272
1273
1274
1275
1276
1277
1278
1279
1280
1281
1282
1283
1284
1285
1286
1287
1288
1289
1290
1291
1292
1293
1294
1295
1296
1297
1298
1299
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1360
1361
1362
1363
1364
1365
1366
1367
1368
1369
1370
1371
1372
1373
1374
1375
1376
1377
1378
1379
1380
1381
1382
1383
1384
1385
1386
1387
1388
1389
1390
1391
1392
1393
1394
1395
1396
1397
1398
1399
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
1441
1442
1443
1444
1445
1446
1447
1448
1449
1450
1451
1452
1453
1454
1455
1456
1457
1458
1459
1460
1461
1462
1463
1464
1465
1466
1467
1468
1469
1470
1471
1472
1473
1474
1475
1476
1477
1478
1479
1480
1481
1482
1483
1484
1485
1486
1487
1488
1489
1490
1491
1492
1493
1494
1495
1496
1497
1498
1499
1500
1501
1502
1503
1504
1505
1506
1507
1508
1509
1510
1511
1512
1513
1514
1515
1516
1517
1518
1519
1520
1521
1522
1523
1524
1525
1526
1527
1528
1529
1530
1531
1532
1533
1534
1535
1536
1537
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1560
1561
1562
1563
1564
1565
1566
1567
1568
1569
1570
1571
1572
1573
1574
1575
1576
1577
1578
1579
1580
1581
1582
1583
1584
1585
1586
1587
1588
1589
1590
1591
1592
1593
1594
1595
1596
1597
1598
1599
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1660
1661
1662
1663
1664
1665
1666
1667
1668
1669
1670
1671
1672
1673
1674
1675
1676
1677
1678
1679
1680
1681
1682
1683
1684
1685
1686
1687
1688
1689
1690
1691
1692
1693
1694
1695
1696
1697
1698
1699
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1760
1761
1762
1763
1764
1765
1766
1767
1768
1769
1770
1771
1772
1773
1774
1775
1776
1777
1778
1779
1780
1781
1782
1783
1784
1785
1786
1787
1788
1789
1790
1791
1792
1793
1794
1795
1796
1797
1798
1799
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1860
1861
1862
1863
1864
1865
1866
1867
1868
1869
1870
1871
1872
1873
1874
1875
1876
1877
1878
1879
1880
1881
1882
1883
1884
1885
1886
1887
1888
1889
1890
1891
1892
1893
1894
1895
1896
1897
1898
1899
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
1966
1967
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2052
2053
2054
2055
2056
2057
2058
2059
2060
2061
2062
2063
2064
2065
2066
2067
2068
2069
2070
2071
2072
2073
2074
2075
2076
2077
2078
2079
2080
2081
2082
2083
2084
2085
2086
2087
2088
2089
2090
2091
2092
2093
2094
2095
2096
2097
2098
2099
2100
2101
2102
2103
2104
2105
2106
2107
2108
2109
2110
2111
2112
2113
2114
2115
2116
2117
2118
2119
2120
2121
2122
2123
2124
2125
2126
2127
2128
2129
2130
2131
2132
2133
2134
2135
2136
2137
2138
2139
2140
2141
2142
2143
2144
2145
2146
2147
2148
2149
2150
2151
2152
2153
2154
2155
2156
2157
2158
2159
2160
2161
2162
2163
2164
2165
2166
2167
2168
2169
2170
2171
2172
2173
2174
2175
2176
2177
2178
2179
2180
2181
2182
2183
2184
2185
2186
2187
2188
2189
2190
2191
2192
2193
2194
2195
2196
2197
2198
2199
2200
2201
2202
2203
2204
2205
2206
2207
2208
2209
2210
2211
2212
2213
2214
2215
2216
2217
2218
2219
2220
2221
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2230
2231
2232
2233
2234
2235
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
2253
2254
2255
2256
2257
2258
2259
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272
2273
2274
2275
2276
2277
2278
2279
2280
2281
2282
2283
2284
2285
2286
2287
2288
2289
2290
2291
2292
2293
2294
2295
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2312
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2319
2320
2321
2322
2323
2324
2325
2326
2327
2328
2329
2330
2331
2332
2333
2334
2335
2336
2337
2338
2339
2340
2341
2342
2343
2344
2345
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
2353
2354
2355
2356
2357
2358
2359
2360
2361
2362
2363
2364
2365
2366
2367
2368
2369
2370
2371
2372
2373
2374
2375
2376
2377
2378
2379
2380
2381
2382
2383
2384
2385
2386
2387
2388
2389
2390
2391
2392
2393
2394
2395
2396
2397
2398
2399
2400
2401
2402
2403
2404
2405
2406
2407
2408
2409
2410
2411
2412
2413
2414
2415
2416
2417
2418
2419
2420
2421
2422
2423
2424
2425
2426
2427
2428
2429
2430
2431
2432
2433
2434
2435
2436
2437
2438
2439
2440
2441
2442
2443
2444
2445
2446
2447
2448
2449
2450
2451
2452
2453
2454
2455
2456
2457
2458
2459
2460
2461
2462
2463
2464
2465
2466
2467
2468
2469
2470
2471
2472
2473
2474
2475
2476
2477
2478
2479
2480
2481
2482
2483
2484
2485
2486
2487
2488
2489
2490
2491
2492
2493
2494
2495
2496
2497
2498
2499
2500
2501
2502
2503
2504
2505
2506
2507
2508
2509
2510
2511
2512
2513
2514
2515
2516
2517
2518
2519
2520
2521
2522
2523
2524
2525
2526
2527
2528
2529
2530
2531
2532
2533
2534
2535
2536
2537
2538
2539
2540
2541
2542
2543
2544
2545
2546
2547
2548
2549
2550
2551
2552
2553
2554
2555
2556
2557
2558
2559
2560
2561
2562
2563
2564
2565
2566
2567
2568
2569
2570
2571
2572
2573
2574
2575
2576
2577
2578
2579
2580
2581
2582
2583
2584
2585
2586
2587
2588
2589
2590
2591
2592
2593
2594
2595
2596
2597
2598
2599
2600
2601
2602
2603
2604
2605
2606
2607
2608
2609
2610
2611
2612
2613
2614
2615
2616
2617
2618
2619
2620
2621
2622
2623
2624
2625
2626
2627
2628
2629
2630
2631
2632
2633
2634
2635
2636
2637
2638
2639
2640
2641
2642
2643
2644
2645
2646
2647
2648
2649
2650
2651
2652
2653
2654
2655
2656
2657
2658
2659
2660
2661
2662
2663
2664
2665
2666
2667
2668
2669
2670
2671
2672
2673
2674
2675
2676
2677
2678
2679
2680
2681
2682
2683
2684
2685
2686
2687
2688
2689
2690
2691
2692
2693
2694
2695
2696
2697
2698
2699
2700
2701
2702
2703
2704
2705
2706
2707
2708
2709
2710
2711
2712
2713
2714
2715
2716
2717
2718
2719
2720
2721
2722
2723
2724
2725
2726
2727
2728
2729
2730
2731
2732
2733
2734
2735
2736
2737
2738
2739
2740
2741
2742
2743
2744
2745
2746
2747
2748
2749
2750
2751
2752
2753
2754
2755
2756
2757
2758
2759
2760
2761
2762
2763
2764
2765
2766
2767
2768
2769
2770
2771
2772
2773
2774
2775
2776
2777
2778
2779
2780
2781
2782
2783
2784
2785
2786
2787
2788
2789
2790
2791
2792
2793
2794
2795
2796
2797
2798
2799
2800
2801
2802
2803
2804
2805
2806
2807
2808
2809
2810
2811
2812
2813
2814
2815
2816
2817
2818
2819
2820
2821
2822
2823
2824
2825
2826
2827
2828
2829
2830
2831
2832
2833
2834
2835
2836
2837
2838
2839
2840
2841
2842
2843
2844
2845
2846
2847
2848
2849
2850
2851
2852
2853
2854
2855
2856
2857
2858
2859
2860
2861
2862
2863
2864
2865
2866
2867
2868
2869
2870
2871
2872
2873
2874
2875
2876
2877
2878
2879
2880
2881
2882
2883
2884
2885
2886
2887
2888
2889
2890
2891
2892
2893
2894
2895
2896
2897
2898
2899
2900
2901
2902
2903
2904
2905
2906
2907
2908
2909
2910
2911
2912
2913
2914
2915
2916
2917
2918
2919
2920
2921
2922
2923
2924
2925
2926
2927
2928
2929
2930
2931
2932
2933
2934
2935
2936
2937
2938
2939
2940
2941
2942
2943
2944
2945
2946
2947
2948
2949
2950
2951
2952
2953
2954
2955
2956
2957
2958
2959
2960
2961
2962
2963
2964
2965
2966
2967
2968
2969
2970
2971
2972
2973
2974
2975
2976
2977
2978
2979
2980
2981
2982
2983
2984
2985
2986
2987
2988
2989
2990
2991
2992
2993
2994
2995
2996
2997
2998
2999
3000
3001
3002
3003
3004
3005
3006
3007
3008
3009
3010
3011
3012
3013
3014
3015
3016
3017
3018
3019
3020
3021
3022
3023
3024
3025
3026
3027
3028
3029
3030
3031
3032
3033
3034
3035
3036
3037
3038
3039
3040
3041
3042
3043
3044
3045
3046
3047
3048
3049
3050
3051
3052
3053
3054
3055
3056
3057
3058
3059
3060
3061
3062
3063
3064
3065
3066
3067
3068
3069
3070
3071
3072
3073
3074
3075
3076
3077
3078
3079
3080
3081
3082
3083
3084
3085
3086
3087
3088
3089
3090
3091
3092
3093
3094
3095
3096
3097
3098
3099
3100
3101
3102
3103
3104
3105
3106
3107
3108
3109
3110
3111
3112
3113
3114
3115
3116
3117
3118
3119
3120
3121
3122
3123
3124
3125
3126
3127
3128
3129
3130
3131
3132
3133
3134
3135
3136
3137
3138
3139
3140
3141
3142
3143
3144
3145
3146
3147
3148
3149
3150
3151
3152
3153
3154
3155
3156
3157
3158
3159
3160
3161
3162
3163
3164
3165
3166
3167
3168
3169
3170
3171
3172
3173
3174
3175
3176
3177
3178
3179
3180
3181
3182
3183
3184
3185
3186
3187
3188
3189
3190
3191
3192
3193
3194
3195
3196
3197
3198
3199
3200
3201
3202
3203
3204
3205
3206
3207
3208
3209
3210
3211
3212
3213
3214
3215
3216
3217
3218
3219
3220
3221
3222
3223
3224
3225
3226
3227
3228
3229
3230
3231
3232
3233
3234
3235
3236
3237
3238
3239
3240
3241
3242
3243
3244
3245
3246
3247
3248
3249
3250
3251
3252
3253
3254
3255
3256
3257
3258
3259
3260
3261
3262
3263
3264
3265
3266
3267
3268
3269
3270
3271
3272
3273
3274
3275
3276
3277
3278
3279
3280
3281
3282
3283
3284
3285
3286
3287
3288
3289
3290
3291
3292
3293
3294
3295
3296
3297
3298
3299
3300
3301
3302
3303
3304
3305
3306
3307
3308
3309
3310
3311
3312
3313
3314
3315
3316
3317
3318
3319
3320
3321
3322
3323
3324
3325
3326
3327
3328
3329
3330
3331
3332
3333
3334
3335
3336
3337
3338
3339
3340
3341
3342
3343
3344
3345
3346
3347
3348
3349
3350
3351
3352
3353
3354
3355
3356
3357
3358
3359
3360
3361
3362
3363
3364
3365
3366
3367
3368
3369
3370
3371
3372
3373
3374
3375
3376
3377
3378
3379
3380
3381
3382
3383
3384
3385
3386
3387
3388
3389
3390
3391
3392
3393
3394
3395
3396
3397
3398
3399
3400
3401
3402
3403
3404
3405
3406
3407
3408
3409
3410
3411
3412
3413
3414
3415
3416
3417
3418
3419
3420
3421
3422
3423
3424
3425
3426
3427
3428
3429
3430
3431
3432
3433
3434
3435
3436
3437
3438
3439
3440
3441
3442
3443
3444
3445
3446
3447
3448
3449
3450
3451
3452
3453
3454
3455
3456
3457
3458
3459
3460
3461
3462
3463
3464
3465
3466
3467
3468
3469
3470
3471
3472
3473
3474
3475
3476
3477
3478
3479
3480
3481
3482
3483
3484
3485
3486
3487
3488
3489
3490
3491
3492
3493
3494
3495
3496
3497
3498
3499
3500
3501
3502
3503
3504
3505
3506
3507
3508
3509
3510
3511
3512
3513
3514
3515
3516
3517
3518
3519
3520
3521
3522
3523
3524
3525
3526
3527
3528
3529
3530
3531
3532
3533
3534
3535
3536
3537
3538
3539
3540
3541
3542
3543
3544
3545
3546
3547
3548
3549
3550
3551
3552
3553
3554
3555
3556
3557
3558
3559
3560
3561
3562
3563
3564
3565
3566
3567
3568
3569
3570
3571
3572
3573
3574
3575
3576
3577
3578
3579
3580
3581
3582
3583
3584
3585
3586
3587
3588
3589
3590
3591
3592
3593
3594
3595
3596
3597
3598
3599
3600
3601
3602
3603
3604
3605
3606
3607
3608
3609
3610
3611
3612
3613
3614
3615
3616
3617
3618
3619
3620
3621
3622
3623
3624
3625
3626
3627
3628
3629
3630
3631
3632
3633
3634
3635
3636
3637
3638
3639
3640
3641
3642
3643
3644
3645
3646
3647
3648
3649
3650
3651
3652
3653
3654
3655
3656
3657
3658
3659
3660
3661
3662
3663
3664
3665
3666
3667
3668
3669
3670
3671
3672
3673
3674
3675
3676
3677
3678
3679
3680
3681
3682
3683
3684
3685
3686
3687
3688
3689
3690
3691
3692
3693
3694
3695
3696
3697
3698
3699
3700
3701
3702
3703
3704
3705
3706
3707
3708
3709
3710
3711
3712
3713
3714
3715
3716
3717
3718
3719
3720
3721
3722
3723
3724
3725
3726
3727
3728
3729
3730
3731
3732
3733
3734
3735
3736
3737
3738
3739
3740
3741
3742
3743
3744
3745
3746
3747
3748
3749
3750
3751
3752
3753
3754
3755
3756
3757
3758
3759
3760
3761
3762
3763
3764
3765
3766
3767
3768
3769
3770
3771
3772
3773
3774
3775
3776
3777
3778
3779
3780
3781
3782
3783
3784
3785
3786
3787
3788
3789
3790
3791
3792
3793
3794
3795
3796
3797
3798
3799
3800
3801
3802
3803
3804
3805
3806
3807
3808
3809
3810
3811
3812
3813
3814
3815
3816
3817
3818
3819
3820
3821
3822
3823
3824
3825
3826
3827
3828
3829
3830
3831
3832
3833
3834
3835
3836
3837
3838
3839
3840
3841
3842
3843
3844
3845
3846
3847
3848
3849
3850
3851
3852
3853
3854
3855
3856
3857
3858
3859
3860
3861
3862
3863
3864
3865
3866
3867
3868
3869
3870
3871
3872
3873
3874
3875
3876
3877
3878
3879
3880
3881
3882
3883
3884
3885
3886
3887
3888
3889
3890
3891
3892
3893
3894
3895
3896
3897
3898
3899
3900
3901
3902
3903
3904
3905
3906
3907
3908
3909
3910
3911
3912
3913
3914
3915
3916
3917
3918
3919
3920
3921
3922
3923
3924
3925
3926
3927
3928
3929
3930
3931
3932
3933
3934
3935
3936
3937
3938
3939
3940
3941
3942
3943
3944
3945
3946
3947
3948
3949
3950
3951
3952
3953
3954
3955
3956
3957
3958
3959
3960
3961
3962
3963
3964
3965
3966
3967
3968
3969
3970
3971
3972
3973
3974
3975
3976
3977
3978
3979
3980
3981
3982
3983
3984
3985
3986
3987
3988
3989
3990
3991
3992
3993
3994
3995
3996
3997
3998
3999
4000
4001
4002
4003
4004
4005
4006
4007
4008
4009
4010
4011
4012
4013
4014
4015
4016
4017
4018
4019
4020
4021
4022
4023
4024
4025
4026
4027
4028
4029
4030
4031
4032
4033
4034
4035
4036
4037
4038
4039
4040
4041
4042
4043
4044
4045
4046
4047
4048
4049
4050
4051
4052
4053
4054
4055
4056
4057
4058
4059
4060
4061
4062
4063
4064
4065
4066
4067
4068
4069
4070
4071
4072
4073
4074
4075
4076
4077
4078
4079
4080
4081
4082
4083
4084
4085
4086
4087
4088
4089
4090
4091
4092
4093
4094
4095
4096
4097
4098
4099
4100
4101
4102
4103
4104
4105
4106
4107
4108
4109
4110
4111
4112
4113
4114
4115
4116
4117
4118
4119
4120
4121
4122
4123
4124
4125
4126
4127
4128
4129
4130
4131
4132
4133
4134
4135
4136
4137
4138
4139
4140
4141
4142
4143
4144
4145
4146
4147
4148
4149
4150
4151
4152
4153
4154
4155
4156
4157
4158
4159
4160
4161
4162
4163
4164
4165
4166
4167
4168
4169
4170
4171
4172
4173
4174
4175
4176
4177
4178
4179
4180
4181
4182
4183
4184
4185
4186
4187
4188
4189
4190
4191
4192
4193
4194
4195
4196
4197
4198
4199
4200
4201
4202
4203
4204
4205
4206
4207
4208
4209
4210
4211
4212
4213
4214
4215
4216
4217
4218
4219
4220
4221
4222
4223
4224
4225
4226
4227
4228
4229
4230
4231
4232
4233
4234
4235
4236
4237
4238
4239
4240
4241
4242
4243
4244
4245
4246
4247
4248
4249
4250
4251
4252
4253
4254
4255
4256
4257
4258
4259
4260
4261
4262
4263
4264
4265
4266
4267
4268
4269
4270
4271
4272
4273
4274
4275
4276
4277
4278
4279
4280
4281
4282
4283
4284
4285
4286
4287
4288
4289
4290
4291
4292
4293
4294
4295
4296
4297
4298
4299
4300
4301
4302
4303
4304
4305
4306
4307
4308
4309
4310
4311
4312
4313
4314
4315
4316
4317
4318
4319
4320
4321
4322
4323
4324
4325
4326
4327
4328
4329
4330
4331
4332
4333
4334
4335
4336
4337
4338
4339
4340
4341
4342
4343
4344
4345
4346
4347
4348
4349
4350
4351
4352
4353
4354
4355
4356
4357
4358
4359
4360
4361
4362
4363
4364
4365
4366
4367
4368
4369
4370
4371
4372
4373
4374
4375
4376
4377
4378
4379
4380
4381
4382
4383
4384
4385
4386
4387
4388
4389
4390
4391
4392
4393
4394
4395
4396
4397
4398
4399
4400
4401
4402
4403
4404
4405
4406
4407
4408
4409
4410
4411
4412
4413
4414
4415
4416
4417
4418
4419
4420
4421
4422
4423
4424
4425
4426
4427
4428
4429
4430
4431
4432
4433
4434
4435
4436
4437
4438
4439
4440
4441
4442
4443
4444
4445
4446
4447
4448
4449
4450
4451
4452
4453
4454
4455
4456
4457
4458
4459
4460
4461
4462
4463
4464
4465
4466
4467
4468
4469
4470
4471
4472
4473
4474
4475
4476
4477
4478
4479
4480
4481
4482
4483
4484
4485
4486
4487
4488
4489
4490
4491
4492
4493
4494
4495
4496
4497
4498
4499
4500
4501
4502
4503
4504
4505
4506
4507
4508
4509
4510
4511
4512
4513
4514
4515
4516
4517
4518
4519
4520
4521
4522
4523
4524
4525
4526
4527
4528
4529
4530
4531
4532
4533
4534
4535
4536
4537
4538
4539
4540
4541
4542
4543
4544
4545
4546
4547
4548
4549
4550
4551
4552
4553
4554
4555
4556
4557
4558
4559
4560
4561
4562
4563
4564
4565
4566
4567
4568
4569
4570
4571
4572
4573
4574
4575
4576
4577
4578
4579
4580
4581
4582
4583
4584
4585
4586
4587
4588
4589
4590
4591
4592
4593
4594
4595
4596
4597
4598
4599
4600
4601
4602
4603
4604
4605
4606
4607
4608
4609
4610
4611
4612
4613
4614
4615
4616
4617
4618
4619
4620
4621
4622
4623
4624
4625
4626
4627
4628
4629
4630
4631
4632
4633
4634
4635
4636
4637
4638
4639
4640
4641
4642
4643
4644
4645
4646
4647
4648
4649
4650
4651
4652
4653
4654
4655
4656
4657
4658
4659
4660
4661
4662
4663
4664
4665
4666
4667
4668
4669
4670
4671
4672
4673
4674
4675
4676
4677
4678
4679
4680
4681
4682
4683
4684
4685
4686
4687
4688
4689
4690
4691
4692
4693
4694
4695
4696
4697
4698
4699
4700
4701
4702
4703
4704
4705
4706
4707
4708
4709
4710
4711
4712
4713
4714
4715
4716
4717
4718
4719
4720
4721
4722
4723
4724
4725
4726
4727
4728
4729
4730
4731
4732
4733
4734
4735
4736
4737
4738
4739
4740
4741
4742
4743
4744
4745
4746
4747
4748
4749
4750
4751
4752
4753
4754
4755
4756
4757
4758
4759
4760
4761
4762
4763
4764
4765
4766
4767
4768
4769
4770
4771
4772
4773
4774
4775
4776
4777
4778
4779
4780
4781
4782
4783
4784
4785
4786
4787
4788
4789
4790
4791
4792
4793
4794
4795
4796
4797
4798
4799
4800
4801
4802
4803
4804
4805
4806
4807
4808
4809
4810
4811
4812
4813
4814
4815
4816
4817
4818
4819
4820
4821
4822
4823
4824
4825
4826
4827
4828
4829
4830
4831
4832
4833
4834
4835
4836
4837
4838
4839
4840
4841
4842
4843
4844
4845
4846
4847
4848
4849
4850
4851
4852
4853
4854
4855
4856
4857
4858
4859
4860
4861
4862
4863
4864
4865
4866
4867
4868
4869
4870
4871
4872
4873
4874
4875
4876
4877
4878
4879
4880
4881
4882
4883
4884
4885
4886
4887
4888
4889
4890
4891
4892
4893
4894
4895
4896
4897
4898
4899
4900
4901
4902
4903
4904
4905
4906
4907
4908
4909
4910
4911
4912
4913
4914
4915
4916
4917
4918
4919
4920
4921
4922
4923
4924
4925
4926
4927
4928
4929
4930
4931
4932
4933
4934
4935
4936
4937
4938
4939
4940
4941
4942
4943
4944
4945
4946
4947
4948
4949
4950
4951
4952
4953
4954
4955
4956
4957
4958
4959
4960
4961
4962
4963
4964
4965
4966
4967
4968
4969
4970
4971
4972
4973
4974
4975
4976
4977
4978
4979
4980
4981
4982
4983
4984
4985
4986
4987
4988
4989
4990
4991
4992
4993
4994
4995
4996
4997
4998
4999
5000
5001
5002
5003
5004
5005
5006
5007
5008
5009
5010
5011
5012
5013
5014
5015
5016
5017
5018
5019
5020
5021
5022
5023
5024
5025
5026
5027
5028
5029
5030
5031
5032
5033
5034
5035
5036
5037
5038
5039
5040
5041
5042
5043
5044
5045
5046
5047
5048
5049
5050
5051
5052
5053
5054
5055
5056
5057
5058
5059
5060
5061
5062
5063
5064
5065
5066
5067
5068
5069
5070
5071
5072
5073
5074
5075
5076
5077
5078
5079
5080
5081
5082
5083
5084
5085
5086
5087
5088
5089
5090
5091
5092
5093
5094
5095
5096
5097
5098
5099
5100
5101
5102
5103
5104
5105
5106
5107
5108
5109
5110
5111
5112
5113
5114
5115
5116
5117
5118
5119
5120
5121
5122
5123
5124
5125
5126
5127
5128
5129
5130
5131
5132
5133
5134
5135
5136
5137
5138
5139
5140
5141
5142
5143
5144
5145
5146
5147
5148
5149
5150
5151
5152
5153
5154
5155
5156
5157
5158
5159
5160
5161
5162
5163
5164
5165
5166
5167
5168
5169
5170
5171
5172
5173
5174
5175
5176
5177
5178
5179
5180
5181
5182
5183
5184
5185
5186
5187
5188
5189
5190
5191
5192
5193
5194
5195
5196
5197
5198
5199
5200
5201
5202
5203
5204
5205
5206
5207
5208
5209
5210
5211
5212
5213
5214
5215
5216
5217
5218
5219
5220
5221
5222
5223
5224
5225
5226
5227
5228
5229
5230
5231
5232
5233
5234
5235
5236
5237
5238
5239
5240
5241
5242
5243
5244
5245
5246
5247
5248
5249
5250
5251
5252
5253
5254
5255
5256
5257
5258
5259
5260
5261
5262
5263
5264
5265
5266
5267
5268
5269
5270
5271
5272
5273
5274
5275
5276
5277
5278
5279
5280
5281
5282
5283
5284
5285
5286
5287
5288
5289
5290
5291
5292
5293
5294
5295
5296
5297
5298
5299
5300
5301
5302
5303
5304
5305
5306
5307
5308
5309
5310
5311
5312
5313
5314
5315
5316
5317
5318
5319
5320
5321
5322
5323
5324
5325
5326
5327
5328
5329
5330
5331
5332
5333
5334
5335
5336
5337
5338
5339
5340
5341
5342
5343
5344
5345
5346
5347
5348
5349
5350
5351
5352
5353
5354
5355
5356
5357
5358
5359
5360
5361
5362
5363
5364
5365
5366
5367
5368
5369
5370
5371
5372
5373
5374
5375
5376
5377
5378
5379
5380
5381
5382
5383
5384
5385
5386
5387
5388
5389
5390
5391
5392
5393
5394
5395
5396
5397
5398
5399
5400
5401
5402
5403
5404
5405
5406
5407
5408
5409
5410
5411
5412
5413
5414
5415
5416
5417
5418
5419
5420
5421
5422
5423
5424
5425
5426
5427
5428
5429
5430
5431
5432
5433
5434
5435
5436
5437
5438
5439
5440
5441
5442
5443
5444
5445
5446
5447
5448
5449
5450
5451
5452
5453
5454
5455
5456
5457
5458
5459
5460
5461
5462
5463
5464
5465
5466
5467
5468
5469
5470
5471
5472
5473
5474
5475
5476
5477
5478
5479
5480
5481
5482
5483
5484
5485
5486
5487
5488
5489
5490
5491
5492
5493
5494
5495
5496
5497
5498
5499
5500
5501
5502
5503
5504
5505
5506
5507
5508
5509
5510
5511
5512
5513
5514
5515
5516
5517
5518
5519
5520
5521
5522
5523
5524
5525
5526
5527
5528
5529
5530
5531
5532
5533
5534
5535
5536
5537
5538
5539
5540
5541
5542
5543
5544
5545
5546
5547
5548
5549
5550
5551
5552
5553
5554
5555
5556
5557
5558
5559
5560
5561
5562
5563
5564
5565
5566
5567
5568
5569
5570
5571
5572
5573
5574
5575
5576
5577
5578
5579
5580
5581
5582
5583
5584
5585
5586
5587
5588
5589
5590
5591
5592
5593
5594
5595
5596
5597
5598
5599
5600
5601
5602
5603
5604
5605
5606
5607
5608
5609
5610
5611
5612
5613
5614
5615
5616
5617
5618
5619
5620
5621
5622
5623
5624
5625
5626
5627
5628
5629
5630
5631
5632
5633
5634
5635
5636
5637
5638
5639
5640
5641
5642
5643
5644
5645
5646
5647
5648
5649
5650
5651
5652
5653
5654
5655
5656
5657
5658
5659
5660
5661
5662
5663
5664
5665
5666
5667
5668
5669
5670
5671
5672
5673
5674
5675
5676
5677
5678
5679
5680
5681
5682
5683
5684
5685
5686
5687
5688
5689
5690
5691
5692
5693
5694
5695
5696
5697
5698
5699
5700
5701
5702
5703
5704
5705
5706
5707
5708
5709
5710
5711
5712
5713
5714
5715
5716
5717
5718
5719
5720
5721
5722
5723
5724
5725
5726
5727
5728
5729
5730
5731
5732
5733
5734
5735
5736
5737
5738
5739
5740
5741
5742
5743
5744
5745
5746
5747
5748
5749
5750
5751
5752
5753
5754
5755
5756
5757
5758
5759
5760
5761
5762
5763
5764
5765
5766
5767
5768
5769
5770
5771
5772
5773
5774
5775
5776
5777
5778
5779
5780
5781
5782
5783
5784
5785
5786
5787
5788
5789
5790
5791
5792
5793
5794
5795
5796
5797
5798
5799
5800
5801
5802
5803
5804
5805
5806
5807
5808
5809
5810
5811
5812
5813
5814
5815
5816
5817
5818
5819
5820
5821
5822
5823
5824
5825
5826
5827
5828
5829
5830
5831
5832
5833
5834
5835
5836
5837
5838
5839
5840
5841
5842
5843
5844
5845
5846
5847
5848
5849
5850
5851
5852
5853
5854
5855
5856
5857
5858
5859
5860
5861
5862
5863
5864
5865
5866
5867
5868
5869
5870
5871
5872
5873
5874
5875
5876
5877
5878
5879
5880
5881
5882
5883
5884
5885
5886
5887
5888
5889
5890
5891
5892
5893
5894
5895
5896
5897
5898
5899
5900
5901
5902
5903
5904
5905
5906
5907
5908
5909
5910
5911
5912
5913
5914
5915
5916
5917
5918
5919
5920
5921
5922
5923
5924
5925
5926
5927
5928
5929
5930
5931
5932
5933
5934
5935
5936
5937
5938
5939
5940
5941
5942
5943
5944
5945
5946
5947
5948
5949
5950
5951
5952
5953
5954
5955
5956
5957
5958
5959
5960
5961
5962
5963
5964
5965
5966
5967
5968
5969
5970
5971
5972
5973
5974
5975
5976
5977
5978
5979
5980
5981
5982
5983
5984
5985
5986
5987
5988
5989
5990
5991
5992
5993
5994
5995
5996
5997
5998
5999
6000
6001
6002
6003
6004
6005
6006
6007
6008
6009
6010
6011
6012
6013
6014
6015
6016
6017
6018
6019
6020
6021
6022
6023
6024
6025
6026
6027
6028
6029
6030
6031
6032
6033
6034
6035
6036
6037
6038
6039
6040
6041
6042
6043
6044
6045
6046
6047
6048
6049
6050
6051
6052
6053
6054
6055
6056
6057
6058
6059
6060
6061
6062
6063
6064
6065
6066
6067
6068
6069
6070
6071
6072
6073
6074
6075
6076
6077
6078
6079
6080
6081
6082
6083
6084
6085
6086
6087
6088
6089
6090
6091
6092
6093
6094
6095
6096
6097
6098
6099
6100
6101
6102
6103
6104
6105
6106
6107
6108
6109
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 10 (filtered)">
<title>Independent Bohemia by Vladimir Nosek</title>
<style type="text/css">
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"MS Mincho";
panose-1:2 2 6 9 4 2 5 8 3 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"\@MS Mincho";}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin-top:6.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.MsoList, li.MsoList, div.MsoList
{margin-top:6.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.25in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.MsoList2, li.MsoList2, div.MsoList2
{margin-top:6.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.5in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-indent:-.25in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText
{margin-top:6.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
span.EmailStyle15
{font-family:Arial;
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle16
{font-family:Arial;
color:windowtext;}
p.BlockQuote, li.BlockQuote, div.BlockQuote
{margin-top:6.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.3in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.ImageNum, li.ImageNum, div.ImageNum
{margin-top:6.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
p.TablePlainText, li.TablePlainText, div.TablePlainText
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Courier New";}
p.BlockQuoteLevel2, li.BlockQuoteLevel2, div.BlockQuoteLevel2
{margin-top:6.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:.6in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.Chapter, li.Chapter, div.Chapter
{margin-top:48.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.ChapterDescription, li.ChapterDescription, div.ChapterDescription
{margin-top:24.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
p.Section, li.Section, div.Section
{margin-top:24.0pt;
margin-right:0in;
margin-bottom:0in;
margin-left:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 65.95pt 1.0in 65.95pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
/* List Definitions */
ol
{margin-bottom:0in;}
ul
{margin-bottom:0in;}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=EN-US >
<pre>
The Project Gutenberg EBook of Independent Bohemia, by Vladimir Nosek
Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the
copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing
this or any other Project Gutenberg eBook.
This header should be the first thing seen when viewing this Project
Gutenberg file. Please do not remove it. Do not change or edit the
header without written permission.
Please read the "legal small print," and other information about the
eBook and Project Gutenberg at the bottom of this file. Included is
important information about your specific rights and restrictions in
how the file may be used. You can also find out about how to make a
donation to Project Gutenberg, and how to get involved.
**Welcome To The World of Free Plain Vanilla Electronic Texts**
**eBooks Readable By Both Humans and By Computers, Since 1971**
*****These eBooks Were Prepared By Thousands of Volunteers!*****
Title: Independent Bohemia
Author: Vladimir Nosek
Release Date: January, 2006 [EBook #9650]
[Yes, we are more than one year ahead of schedule]
[This file was first posted on October 13, 2003]
Edition: 10
Language: English
Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1
*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK INDEPENDENT BOHEMIA ***
Produced by Juliet Sutherland, David Kline and PG Distributed Proofreaders
</pre>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><img width=585 height=863
src="webimages/image001.gif" alt="Professor Thomas G. Masaryk"> </p>
<p class=MsoNormal> [Illustration:
Professor Thomas G. Masaryk]</p>
<p class=Chapter>INDEPENDENT BOHEMIA</p>
<p class=Section>AN ACCOUNT OF THE CZECHO-SLOVAK STRUGGLE FOR LIBERTY</p>
<p class=Section>By VLADIMIR NOSEK</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Secretary to the Czecho-Slovak Legation in LONDON</p>
<p class=Section>1918</p>
<p class=Chapter>PREFACE</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In the following pages I have attempted to outline the story
of our movement for independence. The manuscript of this book was completed
over four months ago. Since then many important changes have occurred in the
international situation. Chapters in which we dealt with the then still
existing Dual Monarchy must of course be read in the past tense, since Austria
exists no more. And again, many things which we anticipated and hoped for in
the future have already become accomplished facts. However, I trust that the
story itself has not only lost none of its value thereby, but has acquired an
additional interest from a historical point of view. Our aim of national
independence, only quite recently declared by our adversaries to be "an
empty dream of moonstruck idealists," has become to-day not only a practical
proposition, but an accomplished fact. We have our own army, which is by no
means the smallest Allied army, and we also have our own Provisional Government
in Paris, recognised not only by the Allies and by all Czecho-Slovaks abroad,
but even by Czech leaders in Bohemia, with whom we have since the beginning of
the war worked in complete harmony and understanding. The organisation of our
independent State is rapidly proceeding. Austria-Hungary, exhausted
economically and bankrupt politically, has fallen to pieces by the free-will of
her own subject peoples, who, in anticipation of their early victory, broke
their fetters and openly renounced their allegiance to the hated Habsburg and
Hohenzollern rule, even before Austria had actually surrendered to the Allies.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Events have moved rapidly in Austria, especially since the
momentous British declaration of August 9, 1918, recognising the
Czecho-Slovaks--those resident in the Allied countries as much as those in
Bohemia--as an Allied nation, and the Czecho-Slovak National Council--in Paris
as well as in Prague--as the Provisional Government of Bohemia. British
statesmen already then foresaw the coming collapse of Austria and acted
accordingly. It is also no more a secret to-day that because of the
promulgation of the British and United States declarations our Council was able
to conclude special conventions with all the Allied Governments during
September last, whereby all the powers exercised by a real government have been
granted to it.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In the meantime Germany had been losing more and more
control over her allies, being herself hard pressed on the Western front, and
the consequence of this was a growing boldness on the part of the Austrian
Slavs. On October 2 deputy Staněk declared in the name of the whole Czech
deputation that the National Council in Paris were their true spokesmen and
representatives with whom Austria would have to negotiate. Soon afterwards the
Austrian Poles went to Warsaw, where they formed a new all-Polish Government,
and the Southern Slavs entrusted the government of their territorities to their
National Council in Zagreb. Similar councils were formed also by the Ruthenes
and Rumanians. On October 14 the Czecho-Slovak National Council in Paris
constituted itself as a Government of which the Council in Prague acts as an
integral part. The latter took over the reins of government in Bohemia a
fortnight later. On October 19 the Czecho-Slovak Council issued a Declaration
of Independence which we publish in the Appendix, and from which it will be
seen that Bohemia will be progressive and democratic both in her domestic and
foreign policy. A glorious future is no doubt awaiting her. She will be specially
able to render an immense service to the League of Nations as a bulwark of
peace and conciliation among the various peoples of Central Europe.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The break-up of Austria will, of course, affect enormously
the constitution of the future Europe, and in our last chapter we have tried to
give an outline of these impending changes of conditions and international relations.
The break-up of Austria was bound to come sooner or later, whether some
misinformed critics or prejudiced pro-Austrian politicians liked it or not. We
ourselves were always convinced, and we declared openly, that Austria could not
survive this war, because she was at war with the majority of her own subjects,
who wished for nothing more than for her destruction. Unfortunately the fact
that the sympathies of the thirty million of Austrian Slavs and Latins were on
the side of the Entente, constituting such an incontestable moral asset for the
Allies as it does, has not always been fully appreciated by Allied public
opinion. We ourselves, however, never doubted for a moment that the Allied
cause would ultimately triumph and that we would achieve our independence,
because we knew that in struggling for this aim we were only carrying out the
unanimous will of our whole nation. Without waiting for any pledges, without
regard as to which side would be victorious, our nation has from the beginning
staked its all on the Allied victory and has contributed with all its powers to
hasten it. Despite all adverse circumstances, our people, at first completely
at the mercy of their enemies, ruthlessly persecuted and tortured by them,
nevertheless remained firm and resolute. Their attitude was most outspoken and
courageous at all times, and they have also rendered the Allies active
assistance, which is being duly appreciated by them. It is chiefly due to the
efforts of the subject peoples themselves, of whom the Czechs have certainly
been the most outspoken, that the collapse of Austria has occurred, which
finally sealed the fate of Kaiserism and of the Pan-German plans of
Mitteleuropa.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>To-day our hopes for a better future are at last being
fulfilled as a result of the Allies' complete victory, assuring the creation of
a new and just international order. Our much-afflicted yet undaunted people
already consider themselves as independent. The Peace Conference, at which the
Czecho-Slovak Government will be represented, will only confirm the existence
of an independent Czecho-Slovak State.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In conclusion, we should like to express our deep gratitude
to all our English friends for their valuable assistance in our struggle for
the realisation of our ideals. We especially wish to thank once more the
British Government for the generous step taken by them in recognising us as an
Allied and belligerent nation. It was chiefly because of this recognition and
of the gallant deeds of our army that we achieved all our subsequent diplomatic
and political successes. We may assure Great Britain that the Czecho-Slovaks
will never forget what they owe to her, and that they will endeavour to do
their best to merit the trust so generously placed in them.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>VLADIMIR NOSEK.</p>
<p class=TablePlainText style='margin-top:12.0pt'>9, GROSVENOR PLACE, LONDON,</p>
<p class=TablePlainText><i>November</i>, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal> </p>
<p class=MsoNormal><img width=640 height=793
src="webimages/image002.gif"
alt="The International Position Of The Czecho Slovak Republic In Future Europe"> </p>
<p class=MsoNormal> [Illustration: The International Position Of The Czecho Slovak
Republic In Future Europe]</p>
<p class=Chapter>CONTENTS</p>
<p class=MsoList>I. <a href="#WhatIs">WHAT is AUSTRIA-HUNGARY?</a></p>
<p class=MsoList>II. <a href="#PresentWar">AUSTRIA-HUNGARY AND THE PRESENT WAR</a></p>
<p class=MsoList>III. <a href="#PoliticalParties">CZECH POLITICAL PARTIES
BEFORE AND DURING THE WAR</a></p>
<p class=MsoList>IV. <a href="#Terrorism">TERRORISM IN BOHEMIA DURING THE WAR</a><a
name="_Hlt53332808"></a></p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(a)</i> <a href="#LeadersImprisoned">Czech Deputies and
Leaders imprisoned and sentenced to Death;</a></p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(b)</i> <a href="#MonsterTrials">Monster Trials, Arbitrary
Executions, Internment of Civilians, etc.;</a></p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(c)</i> <a href="#PressPersecution">Persecution of the
Press;</a></p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(d)</i> <a href="#Interpellations">Reichsrat
Interpellations</a>.</p>
<p class=MsoList>V. <a href="#AssistedAllies">HOW THE CZECHO SLOVAKS AT HOME
ASSISTED THE ALLIES</a></p>
<p class=MsoList>VI. <a href="#ActionsAbroad">THE MILITARY AND POLITICAL ACTION
OF THE CZECHO-SLOVAKS ABROAD</a></p>
<p class=MsoList>VII. <a href="#SpeakAtHome">THE CZECHS AT HOME BEGIN TO SPEAK</a></p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(a)</i> <a href="#MayDeclaration">Czech Declaration of May
30, 1917</a>;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(b)</i> <a href="#ReichsratSpeeches">Courageous Speeches
delivered by Czech Deputies in the Reichsrat</a>;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(c)</i> <a href="#AfterAmnesty">After the Amnesty</a>;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(d)</i> <a href="#PeaceWithRussia">During Peace
Negotiations with Russia</a>;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(e)</i> <a href="#ConstituentAssembly">The Constituent
Assembly of Prague on January 6, 1918</a>;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(f)</i> <a href="#OathoftheNation">The Oath of the Czecho
Slovak Nation</a>;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(g)</i> <a href="#SlovakAttitude">The Slovaks' Attitude</a>;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(h)</i> <a href="#NationalCouncil">The Czecho-Slovak
National Council in Prague</a>.</p>
<p class=MsoList>VIII. <a href="#Cooperation">CZECHO-SLOVAK CO-OPERATION WITH
OTHER NON-GERMAN NATIONS OF CENTRAL EUROPE</a></p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(a)</i> <a href="#CongressOfRome">The Congress of Rome</a>;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(b)</i> <a href="#MayManifestations">The May
Manifestations in Prague</a>.</p>
<p class=MsoList>IX. <a href="#Bulwark">BOHEMIA AS A BULWARK AGAINST
PAN-GERMANISM</a></p>
<p class=MsoList><a href="#Appendix">APPENDIX OF SOME RECENT DOCUMENTS</a></p>
<p class=MsoList><a href="#Bibliography">BIBLIOGRAPHY</a></p>
<p class=Chapter><a name=WhatIs>I</a></p>
<p class=ChapterDescription>WHAT IS AUSTRIA-HUNGARY?</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>1. The Habsburg Empire is built upon centuries-old
traditions of reaction and violence. Its present power is chiefly based on the
alliance which Bohemia and Hungary concluded with Austria against the Turkish
peril in 1526. The Czechs freely elected the Habsburgs to the throne of Bohemia
which remained a fully independent state, its alliance with Austria and Hungary
being purely dynastic. But soon the Habsburgs began to violate the liberties of
Bohemia which they were bound by oath to observe, and this led finally to the
fateful Czech revolution of 1618. At the battle of the White Mountain in 1620
the Czechs suffered a defeat and were cruelly punished for their rebellion. All
their nobility were either executed or sent into exile, and their property
confiscated. The country was devastated by the imperial hordes, and its
population was reduced from 3,000,000 to 800,000 during the Thirty Years' War.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In 1627 Ferdinand II. greatly curtailed the administrative
rights of Bohemia, yet he did not dare to deprive her entirely of her
independence. In his "Renewed Ordinance of the Land" Ferdinand
declared the Bohemian crown to be hereditary in the House of Habsburg, and
reserved legislative power to the sovereign. But otherwise the historical
rights of Bohemia remained valid, notwithstanding all subsequent arbitrary
centralising measures taken by the Habsburgs. Bohemia's rights were repeatedly
recognised by each succeeding Habsburg. Legally Bohemia is an independent state
to-day.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The heavy persecutions inflicted upon Bohemia had a
disastrous effect upon her intellectual life and national development which
were completely paralysed until the end of the eighteenth century, when owing to
the humanitarian ideals of those times, and as a reaction against the
Germanising centralistic efforts of Joseph II., the Czechs again began to
recover their national consciousness. This revival marked the beginning of the
Czecho-Slovak struggle for the re-establishment of their independence. The
movement was at first literary, and only in the forties became political. It
was a continuous struggle against reaction and absolutism, and if the Czecho-Slovaks
to-day can boast of an advanced civilisation, it is only owing to their
perseverance and hard endeavours, and not because of any good-will on the part
of the Austrian Government which put every possible obstacle in their way.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>2. <i>The present </i><i>Austria-Hungary</i> is primarily a
dynastic estate, for the crown was always its supreme political driving force,
although at present the Habsburgs are mere slaves of their masters, the
Hohenzollerns. It is this characteristic which justifies us in concluding that Austria
is an autocratic state <i>par excellence</i>. If there were no other reason,
this should be sufficient to make every true democrat an enemy of Austria.
Furthermore, it is this characteristic which makes us comprehend why the
Habsburg monarchy is fighting side by side with German autocracy and
imperialism against the allied democracies of the world.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Notwithstanding the so-called constitution which is a mere
cloak for absolutism, the monarch in Austria is emperor by "Divine
Right" alone, and is the absolute master of his subject peoples in virtue
of his privileged position which confers on him an inexhaustible amount of
power and influence. The internal as well as the foreign policy of the monarchy
is directed in the real or supposed interests of the dynasty. The principle <i>divide
et impera</i> is its leading idea in internal politics, and the increase of
dynastic power in foreign policy. The question of war and peace is decided by
the emperor, to whom it also appertains to order matters concerning the
management, leadership and organisation of the whole army. And though in Hungary
the power of the monarch largely depends on the Budapest Parliament, yet even
here the constitutional power of the dynasty is enormous, the King of Hungary
being a governing and legislative factor by no means inferior to that of the
parliament.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Even when attempts were made at enfranchising the masses (as
in 1896 and finally in 1905), the motive again was purely dynastic. Such
constitutional measures as were taken, only strengthened racial dissensions and
were equally insincere and inefficient. The present constitution of 1867, as
well as the previous constitutions of 1849, 1860 and 1861, was granted by the
crown, to whom it was reserved to reverse or modify the same. The parliament is
absolutely powerless in Austria. It is a mere cloak for absolutism, since the
famous Paragraph 14 provides for absolutist government by means of imperial
decrees without parliament in case of emergency. The dynasty took ample
advantage of this clause during the first three years of this war when
absolutism and terrorism reigned supreme in the Dual Monarchy. While since 1861
up to the beginning of the war 156 imperial decrees had been issued, fully 161
have been passed during the first three years of the present war.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The arbitrary power of the dynasty is based: upon the organisation
of the army, the leadership of which is entrusted to the Germans; upon the
feudal aristocracy who are the only real Austrians, since they have no
nationality, though they invariably side with the dominant Germans and Magyars;
upon the power of the police who form the chief instrument of the autocratic
government and who spy upon and terrorise the population; upon the German
bureaucrats who do not consider themselves the servants of the public, but look
upon the public as their servant, and whose spirit of meanness and corruption
is so characteristic of the Austrian body politic; finally, the dynasty relies
upon the Catholic hierarchy who hold vast landed property in Austria and regard
it as the bulwark of Catholicism, and who through Clericalism strive for
political power rather than for the religious welfare of their denomination. In
alliance with them are the powerful Jewish financiers who also control the
press in Vienna and Budapest. Clearly Austria is the very negation of
democracy. It stands for reaction, autocracy, falsehood and hypocrisy, and it
is therefore no exaggeration to say that nobody professing democratic views can
reasonably plead for the preservation of this system of political violence.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>When we remember the enormous power of the dynasty and the
political system which supports it, we understand why in the past Austria has
always played the part of the most reactionary, autocratic and tyrannic state
in Europe. Hopes have indeed been expressed by some Austrophils in the
good-will of the new Austrian Emperor on account of his amiable character. The
Slavs have ample reason to distrust the Habsburgs who have proved to be
treacherous autocrats in the past, and whose records show them as an incapable
and degenerate family. As a political power Kaiser Karl is the same menace to
his subject Slavs as his predecessors. Above all, however, he is of necessity a
blind tool in the hands of Germany, and he cannot possibly extricate himself
from her firm grip. The Habsburgs have had their chance, but they missed it. By
systematic and continuous misgovernment they created a gulf between the Slavs
and themselves which nothing on earth can remove. Every Habsburg believes he
has a "mission" to fulfil. The only mission left for Kaiser Karl is to
abdicate and dissolve his empire into its component parts. There is no reason
whatever why Austria should be saved for the sake of the degenerate and
autocratic Habsburg dynasty.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>3. Let us now examine the much misunderstood racial problems
of the Dual Monarchy. There is no Austrian nation, since there is no Austrian
language. Austria is a mere geographical expression. In fact the Slavs,
constituting the majority of Austrian subjects, would think it an insult to be
called Austrians. During the war they have been treated as subjects of an enemy
state, and to-day they have no part or lot with Austria. The Czech statesman
Rieger once declared that when the Slavs no longer desired the existence of Austria,
no one would be able to save her. And indeed, the claims raised by the majority
of Austria's population to-day mean the death warrant of the Dual Monarchy.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>To get a clear idea of the racial issue, we will quote the
official Austrian statistics, which tell us that in Austria-Hungary there are:</p>
<p class=TablePlainText style='margin-top:12.0pt'> AUSTRIA. HUNGARY.
BOSNIA. TOTAL.</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> </p>
<p class=TablePlainText>SLAVS: Million. Million. Million. Million.
Million.</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>Czecho-Slovaks 6.4 2 -- 8.4</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>Yugoslavs 2 3 1.8 6.8</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>Poles 5 -- -- 5</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>Ruthenes 3.5 0.5 -- 4</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>
-- 24.2</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>LATINS:</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>Italians 0.8 -- -- 0.8</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>Rumanians 0.3 2.9 -- 3.2</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> --
4</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>GERMANS 10 2
-- 12</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>MAGYARS -- 10
-- 10</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>OTHERS 0.6 0.4
-- 1</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> 28.6 20.8
1.8 51.2</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Thus it appears that the Slavs alone (without Italians and
Rumanians) form about 48 per cent. of the total population. The Germans form
only 24 per cent. of the population of Austria-Hungary, while in Hungary proper
the dominant Magyars do not form quite 50 per cent. of the population. The
predominance of the German and Magyar minorities is apparent not only from the
fact that they hold the reins of government, but also from their unfair
proportional representation in both parliaments. Thus instead of 310 seats out
of 516 in the Reichsrat the Slavs hold only 259, while the Germans hold 232
instead of 160. By gaining 83 Polish votes in return for temporary concessions,
the Germans have thus always been in the majority in the Reichsrat in the past.
In Hungary the proportion is still more unjust. The Magyars hold 405 seats
instead of 210 in the parliament of Budapest out of the total number of 413,
while the non-Magyars, entitled according to their numbers to 203 seats, have
in reality only five representatives in the "democratic" parliament
of Budapest.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>All the above calculations are based upon official
statistics which are grossly exaggerated in favour of the Germans and Magyars.
The picture would be still more appalling if we took into consideration the
actual number of the Slavs. The Austrian census is not based upon the
declaration of nationality or of the native language, but upon the statement of
the "language of communication" ("Umgangsprache"). In mixed
districts economic pressure is brought against the Slavs, who are often workmen
dependent upon German masters and bound to declare their nationality as German
for fear they should lose their employment. From private statistics it has been
found that the percentage of Germans in Bohemia can hardly exceed 20 per cent,
as against 37 per cent, given by the official census. Still greater pressure is
brought to bear against the Slavs by the Magyars in Hungary, who are famous for
the brutal methods in which they indulge for the purpose of shameless
falsification of their official statistics. Thus the actual strength of the
rival races of Austria-Hungary may with every justification be estimated as
follows:</p>
<p class=TablePlainText style='margin-top:12.0pt'>SLAVS:</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> Czecho-Slovaks 10 million \</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> Yugoslavs 7-1/2
" |</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>
> 27 million</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> Poles 5
" |</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> Ruthenes 4-1/2
" /</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>LATINS:</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> Italians 1 million \</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> >
5 "</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> Rumanians 4
" /</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>GERMANS 10
" \</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> >
18 "</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>MAGYARS 8
" /</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>OTHERS
1 "</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>
__________________________</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> 51
million</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>4. The rule of the German-Magyar minority over the Slav and
Latin majority, finally established by the introduction of dualism in 1867, was
made possible only by the demoralising system of violence described above. One
race was pitted against the other in Austria and this enabled the Germans to
rule them better, while the Magyars in Hungary, by keeping their subject races
in the darkness of ignorance and by using the most abominable methods of
violence, succeeded in securing for themselves the entire monopoly of
government. The Magyars, who are a race of Asiatic origin, are truly the
faithful descendants of the ancient Huns, and true allies of the Huns of
to-day.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>When Kossuth came to England in 1848, he was hailed as the
champion of freedom and liberty, and entranced his audiences in London and
other English cities by his remarkable oratory. As a matter of fact Kossuth,
though called "the father of the Magyars," was himself a
denationalised Slovak; instead of a "champion of liberty," he might
with much greater justification have been called the champion of the greatest
racial tyranny in Europe. For even then, while fighting for their own liberty
and for the independence of Hungary, the Magyars denied the most elementary
political and national rights to the other peoples living in Hungary.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In 1910 there were 2,202,165 Slovaks in Hungary according to
the official census. These two million Slovaks had only two deputies (Dr. Blaho
and Juriga), while the 8,651,520 Magyars had 405 seats, so that every Slovak
deputy represented one million electors, every Magyar deputy, however, 21,000.
As regards administration, all civil service officials in Hungary have to be of
Magyar nationality. The cases of persecution for political offences are innumerable:
Slovak candidates were prevented from being elected by being imprisoned.
Corruption and violence are the two main characteristics of all elections in
"democratic" Hungary. Even to-day when some Radicals in Budapest talk
of electoral reform, they want suffrage to be extended to Magyar electors only,
and also stipulate that the candidates shall be of Magyar nationality. No
Magyar politicians will ever abandon the programme of the territorial integrity
of Hungary, their aims being expressed in the words of Koloman Tisza: "For
the sake of the future of the Magyar State it is necessary for Hungary to
become a state where only Magyar is spoken. To gain the Slovaks or to come to a
compromise with them is out of the question. There is only one means which is
effective--Extirpation!" And this aim the Magyars have faithfully kept
before them for at least the last hundred years.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In the same way also the economic development of the
non-Magyar nationalities has been systematically hampered, because the Magyars
know that economic dependence means also political subservience. The Slovaks
and Rumanians are not allowed to found co-operative societies or banks on the
ground that such institutions "are opposed to the interests of the
elements which hold the Magyar State together."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>But it is not only the non-Magyars who suffer. The Magyar
working classes and the majority of the Magyar country people themselves are
deprived of political rights, for Hungary is ruled by an oligarchy and scarcely
5 per cent. of the population has the suffrage right.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>We may say, therefore, without exaggeration that to-day Hungary
is the most reactionary country of Europe. Nowhere else (not even in Prussia)
have the people so little power as in Hungary, where the Socialists have not a
single seat in parliament. The "politics" in Hungary are the
privilege of a few aristocrats. Hungary is a typical oligarchic and theocratic
state.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>When the Magyars plead to-day for "peace without
annexations" and for the integrity of Hungary, they want to be allowed to
continue to oppress and systematically magyarise the Slavs and Rumanians of
Hungary. The triumphant allied democracies will not, however, stoop before
autocratic Hungary. The dismemberment of Hungary, according to the principle of
nationality, is a <i>sine qua non</i> of a permanent and just peace in Europe.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>5. The four strongest races in Austria-Hungary, then, are
the Germans, Magyars, Czecho-Slovaks and Yugoslavs, numbering from eight to ten
million each. The Austrian Germans and the Magyars occupy the centre, while the
Czecho-Slovaks inhabit the north (Bohemia, Moravia, Silesia and Slovakia), and
the Yugoslavs ten provinces in the southern part of the monarchy. In order to
facilitate German penetration and domination and to destroy the last remnants
of Bohemia's autonomous constitution, the Austrian Government attempted, by the
imperial decree of May 19, 1918, to dismember Bohemia into twelve
administrative districts with German officials at the head, who were to possess
the same power to rule their respective districts as had hitherto appertained
only to the Governor (Statthalter) of Bohemia, legally responsible to the
Bohemian Diet.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>But not only are the Czecho-Slovaks and Yugoslavs divided
between both halves of the monarchy and among numerous administrative districts
which facilitate German penetration. Dissensions were fomented among the
different parties of these two nations and religious differences exploited. The
Yugoslavs, for instance, consist of three peoples: the Serbs and Croats, who
speak the same language and differ only in religion and orthography, the former
being Orthodox and the latter Catholic; and the Slovenes, who speak a dialect
of Serbo-Croatian and form the most western outpost of the Yugoslav (or
Southern Slav) compact territory. It was the object of the Austrian Government
to exploit these petty differences among Yugoslavs so as to prevent them from
realising that they form one and the same nation entitled to independence. At
the same time Austria has done all in her power to create misunderstandings
between the Slavs and Italians, just as she tried to create dissensions between
Poles and Ruthenes in Galicia, and between Poles and Czechs in Silesia, well
knowing that the dominant races, the Germans and Magyars, would profit thereby.
Fortunately the war has opened the eyes of the subject peoples, and, as we
shall show later on, to-day they all go hand in hand together against their
common enemies in Berlin, Vienna and Budapest.</p>
<p class=Chapter><a name=PresentWar>II</a></p>
<p class=ChapterDescription>AUSTRIA-HUNGARY AND THE PRESENT WAR</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In order to understand fully what is at stake in this war
and why the Slavs are so bitterly opposed to the further existence of Austria-Hungary,
it is necessary to study the foreign policy of the Central Powers during the
past century. The "deepened alliance" concluded between Germany and Austria-Hungary
in May, 1918, resulting in the complete surrender of Austria's independence, is
in fact the natural outcome of a long development and the realisation of the
hopes of Mitteleuropa cherished by the Germans for years past. The scares about
the dangers of "Pan-slavism" were spread by the Germans only in order
to conceal the real danger of Pan-Germanism.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>1. The original theory of Pan-Germanism was the
consolidation and unity of the whole German nation corresponding to the
movement of the Italians for national unity. In fact it was a German, Herder,
who first proclaimed the principle of nationality and declared the nation to be
the natural organ of humanity, as opposed to the idea of the state as an
artificial organisation: "Nothing seems to be so opposed to the purpose of
government as an unnatural extension of territory of a state and a wild
confusion of holding different races and nations under the sway of a single
sceptre." It was this humanitarian philosophy recognising the natural rights
of all nations, great or small, to freedom which inspired the first Czech
regenerators such as Dobrovský, Jungman and Kollár.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The legitimate claims of the Germans to national unity
became unjust and dangerous for Europe when the Germans began to think of
subduing the whole of Central Europe to their hegemony, which meant the
subjugation of some 100 million Slavs and Latins. At first it was Austria
which, as the head of the former Holy Roman Empire, and the traditional bulwark
of Germany in the east (Osterreich--an eastern march), aspired to be the head
of the Pan-German Empire. At the Congress of Vienna in 1815, the Austrian
Emperor became the head of the German Confederation. Prussia at that time
entirely gave way and left the leadership to Metternich's system of absolutism.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>By and by, it became obvious that Austria was, on account of
her non-German population, internally weak, condemned to constant employment of
violence and reaction, and therefore unfit to stand at the head of a strong
modern Pan-Germany. Prussia therefore, as the greatest of the homogeneous
German states, became Austria's rival and was accepted by the Frankfurt
Assembly as the leader of the Confederation. The rivalry between Austria and Prussia
ended in 1866, when after Austria's defeat the clever diplomacy of Bismarck
turned the rivalry between Austria and Prussia into friendship. Since the
Germans in Austria began to feel their impotence in the face of the growing
Slav power, a year later the centralising efforts of the Habsburgs were finally
embodied in the system of dualism which gave over the Slavs and Italians in Austria
to German hegemony and the Slavs and Rumanians in Hungary to Magyar tyranny.
For the support of this hegemony the Austrian Germans and Magyars, whose
ambitions are identical with those of Germany, were entirely dependent on Berlin.
Thus Austria-Hungary became inevitably Germany's partner and vanguard in the
south-east. Finally, the present war was started by the Germans and Magyars
with the object of achieving the ambitious plans preached and expounded by
Pan-German writers for years past. The Germans wanted at all costs to become
the masters of Central Europe, to build an empire from Berlin to Bagdad, and
finally to strike for world domination.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>2. In this turn of events Magyar influence played a greater
part than might be thought. Already in 1848 Kossuth defined the Hungarian
foreign policy as follows:--</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Magyar nation is bound to maintain the most
cordial relations with the free German nation and help it in safeguarding
Western civilisation."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>And while the Hungarian Slavs were prohibited from attending
the Pan-Slav Congress held in Prague in 1848, the Magyars sent two delegates to
Frankfurt in order to give practical expression to the above Magyar policy.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The value of Hungary for the Pan-German plans has been
expressed by Friedrich List who, in 1862, dreamt of "a powerful oriental
German-Magyar Empire," and declared:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The way towards the realisation of this plan runs
through Hungary, and while without Hungary we can do nothing, with her aid we
can do everything. Hungary is for Germany the clue to Turkey and the Near East,
and at the same time a bulwark against a superior power from the north."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Magyars realised from the beginning the importance of an
understanding between themselves and Prussia, and they directed their foreign
policy accordingly. The setting up of dualism in 1867, which finally
established the German-Magyar hegemony in Austria-Hungary in the interests of Prussia,
was the work of two Magyars--Julius Andrassy and Francis Deak, who took
advantage of Austria's defeat at Sadova to further their interests. In 1870,
when Vienna contemplated revenge against Prussia, the Magyars again intervened
in favour of Prussia. When questioned as to Hungary's attitude, Andrassy, then
Premier, declared in the Hungarian Parliament that under no circumstances would
he allow any action against Prussia, and exerted all his influence in Vienna to
that effect. It was also due mainly to Magyar influence that all attempts of
the Czechs to weaken German influence in Austria were frustrated. Francis
Joseph always promised to be crowned King of Bohemia when he wished to placate
the Czechs in times of stress for Austria: in 1861, 1865, 1870 and 1871. But he
never carried out his promises. In this he was guided not only by
considerations of dynastic interest, but also by the advice of the Magyars.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>But the most decisive and fateful exercise of Magyar
influence upon Austria's foreign policy occurred in 1879, when the
Austro-German Alliance was finally concluded. This was equally the work of
Bismarck, who spared the defeated Austria in order to make an ally of her, and
of a Magyar--Count Andrassy--who from 1871 to 1879 was the Austro-Hungarian
Foreign Minister. It was this Magyar help which made Bismarck utter words of
gratitude and declare in 1883:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Our political judgment leads us to the conviction
that German and Magyar interests are inseparable."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>It is true that there always was a Magyar opposition against
Austria (though never against Prussia). But this opposition was used as a
weapon to extort concessions from Austria. At the bottom of their hearts,
however, the Austrian Germans were always at one with the Magyars in their
common desire to oppress the Slavs. And the responsibility of Count Tisza for
the present world catastrophe is just as great as that of the Kaiser himself.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>3. The Czechs saw clearly the progress of events. Bismarck
was well aware of the importance of Bohemia, for he declared that the master of
Bohemia would become the master of Europe. He did not desire to annex any
Austrian territory, since he knew that sooner or later Germany would swallow
the whole of Austria, as she has done in this war. Indeed, at the Congress of
Berlin in 1878, Bismarck did not conceal his intention of using Austria-Hungary
in Germany's interests. At the bottom of his heart he was at one with the
radical Pan-German writers, like Lagarde, Treitschke, Mommsen, Naumann and
others, who openly declared that the Slavs should be subjugated and the Czechs,
as the most courageous and therefore the most dangerous of them, crushed.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Slavs always bitterly opposed the encroachments of
Germanism, and saw in it their chief enemy. The Czech leader Palacký rejected
the invitation to Frankfurt in 1848 and summoned a Slav Congress to Prague. It
is true that Palacký at that time dreamt of an Austria just to all her nations.
He advocated a strong Austria as a federation of nations to counterbalance
Pan-Germanism. Yet at the same time Palacký has proved through his history and
work that Bohemia has full right to independence. He was well aware that a
federalistic and just Austria would have to grant independence to the Czecho-Slovaks.
But later on he gave up his illusions about the possibility of a just Austria,
when he saw that she abandoned the Slavs entirely to German-Magyar hegemony,
and declared that Bohemia existed before Austria and would also exist after
her. In 1866 he wrote:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"I myself now give up all hope of a long preservation
of the Austrian Empire; not because it is not desirable or has no mission to
fulfil, but because it allowed the Germans and Magyars to grasp the reins of
government and to found in it their racial tyranny."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Exasperated by the pact of dualism which the Czechs never
recognised, Palacký went to Moscow and on his return declared:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"I have already said that I do not cherish any hopes
of the preservation of Austria, especially since the Germans and Magyars made
it the home of their racial despotism; the question therefore as to what will
happen to the Slavs hitherto living in Austria is not without significance.
Without attempting to prophesy future events which for a mortal man it is
difficult to foreshadow, I may say from my inner conviction that the Czechs as
a nation, if they fell under the subjection of either Russia or Prussia, would
never rest contented. It would never fade from their memory that according to
right or justice they should be ruled by themselves, that is by their own
government and by their own sovereign. They would regard the Prussians as their
deadly enemies on account of their germanising rage. But as to the Russians,
the Czechs would regard them as their racial brothers and friends; they would
not become their faithful subjects, but their true allies and, if need be, vanguards
in Europe."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Moreover, modern Czech politicians always clearly saw what
the Germans were aiming at. Dr. Kramář, for instance, foresaw the present
situation with remarkable perspicacity. In the <i>Revue de Paris</i> for
February, 1899, he wrote on "The Future of Austria," declaring that
her subject nationalities should be on guard lest she should become a vassal of
Germany and a bridge for German expansion into Asia:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Austrian Germans wish to see Austria subordinated
to German policy, and with the help of a subordinated Austria, the sphere of
German political and economic activity would extend from Hamburg to Asia Minor."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Similarly also he warned Great Britain in the <i>National
Review</i> for October, 1902, that if Pan-German plans were realised,</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Austria would become an appanage of Germany as
regards international relations, and the policy of Europe would be obliged to
reckon, not with a free and independent Austria, but, owing to Austria's
unconditional self-surrender, with a mighty, almost invincible Germany.... The
Pan-Germans are right, the Czechs are an arrow in the side of Germany, and such
they wish to and must and will remain. Their firm and unchangeable hope is that
they will succeed in making of themselves an impenetrable breakwater. They hope
for no foreign help; they neither wish for it nor ask for it. They have only
one desire, namely, that non-German Europe may also at last show that it
understands the meaning of the Bohemian question."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In 1906 Dr. Kramář wrote again in detail on the plans
of German domination in Central Europe, in the Adriatic and in the Near East.
In a book on Czech policy he declared that to prevent the realisation of these
plans was the vital interest of the Czech nation: "A far-seeing Austrian
policy should see in the Czech nation the safeguard of the independence of the
State." And then followed the famous passage which formed part of the
"evidence" quoted against him during his trial for high treason:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"If Austria-Hungary continues her internal policy by
centralising in order to be better able to germanise and preserve the German
character of the State, if she does not resist all efforts for the creation of
a customs and economic union with Germany, the Pan-German movement will prove
fatal for her. To preserve and maintain a state the sole ambition of which was
to be a second German State after Germany, would be superfluous not only for
the European Powers, but also for the non-German nations of Europe. <i>And if,
therefore, a conflict should break out between the German and the non-German
world and the definite fate of Austria should be at stake, the conflict would
surely not end with the preservation of Austria</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>And on November 10, 1911, he admitted that his former hopes
for the destruction of the Austro-German Alliance and a rapprochement between Austria
and Russia proved to be in vain:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"... <i>I had an aim in life and a leading idea. The
events of the annexation crisis have proved calamitous for the policy which I
followed all my life</i>. I wished to do everything which lay within the
compass of my small powers, to render my own nation happy and great in a free,
powerful and generally respected Austria ... <i>I have always resented the fact
that when they talked about Austria people really meant only the Germans and
Magyars, as if the great majority of Slavs upon whom rest the biggest burdens
did not exist</i>. But now--and no beautiful words can make me change my
opinion on that point--an entirely independent policy has become unthinkable,
because the only path which remains open to Vienna leads by way of Berlin. Berlin
will henceforward direct our policy."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>4. To offer any proofs that the present war was deliberately
planned and provoked by the Governments of Berlin, Vienna and Budapest seems to
me superfluous. Who can to-day have any doubt that Austria wilfully provoked
the war in a mad desire to crush Serbia? Who can doubt that Austria for a long
time entertained imperialist ambitions with respect to the Balkans which were
supported by Berlin which wished to use Austria as a "bridge to the
East"?</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>No more damning document for Austria can be imagined than
Prince Lichnowsky's Memorandum. He denounces Austria's hypocritical support of
the independence of Albania. In this respect he holds similar views to those
expressed in the Austrian delegations of 1913 by Professor Masaryk, who rightly
denounced the Austrian plan of setting up an independent Albania on the plea of
"the right of nationalities" which Austria denied her own Slavs.
Professor Masaryk rightly pointed out at that time that an outlet to the sea is
a vital necessity for Serbia, that the Albanians were divided into so many
racial, linguistic and religious groups and so uncivilised that they could not
form an independent nation, and that the whole project was part and parcel of
Austria's anti-Serbian policy and her plans for the conquest of the Balkans.
Prince Lichnowsky admits that an independent Albania "had no prospect of
surviving," and that it was merely an Austrian plan for preventing Serbia
from obtaining an access to the sea.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>He apparently disagrees with the idea of "the power of
a Ruling House, the dynastic idea," but stands up for "a National State,
the democratic idea." That in itself seems to indicate that he is in
favour of the destruction of Austria and its substitution by new states, built
according to the principle of nationality. He admittedly disagrees with the
views of Vienna and Budapest, and criticises Germany's alliance with Austria,
probably knowing, as a far-sighted and well-informed politician, that Austria-Hungary
cannot possibly survive this war.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Prince Lichnowsky frankly admits that the murder of the
Archduke Francis Ferdinand was a mere pretext for Vienna, which in fact had
resolved on an expedition against Serbia soon after the second Balkan war by
which she felt herself humiliated. In scathing terms he denounces the Triple
Alliance policy and thinks it a great mistake that Germany allied herself with
the "Turkish and Magyar oppressors." And though he says that it was Germany
which "persisted that Serbia must be massacred," he makes it quite
clear that it was Vienna that led the conspiracy against Europe, since on all
questions Germany "took up the position prescribed to her by Vienna."
The policy of espousing Austria's quarrels, the development of the
Austro-German Alliance into a pooling of interests in all spheres, was
"the best way of producing war." The Balkan policy of conquest and
strangulation "was not the German policy, but that of the Austrian
Imperial House." What better testimony is required to prove that Austria
was not the blind tool, but the willing and wilful accomplice of Germany?</p>
<p class=Chapter><a name=PoliticalParties>III</a></p>
<p class=ChapterDescription>CZECH POLITICAL PARTIES BEFORE AND DURING THE WAR</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czech policy during the past seventy years has always
had but one ultimate aim in view: the re-establishment of the ancient kingdom
of Bohemia and the full independence of the Czecho-Slovak nation. From the
very beginning of their political activity Czech politicians resisted the
Pan-German scheme of Central Europe. They preached the necessity of the
realisation of liberty and equality for all nations, and of a federation of the
non-Germans of Central Europe as a barrier against German expansion.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The chief reason for the failure of their efforts was the
fact that they sometimes had illusions that the Habsburgs might favour the plan
of such an anti-German federation, although the Habsburgs always mainly relied
on the Germans and Magyars and could not and would not satisfy the Czech
aspirations. The Czechs were greatly handicapped in their political struggle,
because they had only just begun to live as a nation and had to face the
powerful German-Magyar predominance, with the dynasty and the whole state
machinery behind them. Moreover, the Czechs had no national aristocracy like
the Poles or Magyars, and their leaders lacked all political experience and all
sense of reality in politics which was so marked in a state built on deceit and
hypocrisy. They continually defended themselves with declarations about the
justice of their claims, satisfied themselves with empty promises which Austria
has never kept, and cherished vain illusions of obtaining justice in Austria,
while Austria was <i>via facti</i> steadily depriving them of all their rights.
On the other hand, it should be remembered that they were faced with a
government that had the whole powerful German Empire behind it, and that they
had to struggle for freedom in a state where genuine constitutional government
and democracy were unknown. The Czech efforts to obtain some measure of freedom
by struggling for democratic reforms were consistently opposed by the dominant
Germans. To-day, of course, the situation has greatly improved as compared with
the situation seventy years ago. The Czecho-Slovak nation, through its own work
and energy, is a highly advanced and economically self-supporting and rich nation,
and in its struggle for a just resettlement of Central Europe it has the
support not only of all the other non-German nations of Central Europe, but
also of the Entente on whose victory it has staked its all. The Czecho-Slovaks
are resolved not to let themselves be fooled by Austria any longer and claim
full independence from Berlin, Vienna and Budapest, which alone will safeguard
them against the possibility of being again exploited militarily, economically
and politically against their own interests for a cause which they detest.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>1. Although as early as 1812 the Bohemian Diet (then a close
aristocratic body) demanded the restitution of the rights of the kingdom of
Bohemia, the political activity of the Czechs did not really begin until 1848
when, on April 8, the emperor issued the famous Bohemian Charter recognising
the rights of Bohemia to independence. It was that year which marked the end of
Metternich's absolutism and in which revolution broke out in Western and Central
Europe, including Hungary and Bohemia. Already at that time the Czechs counted
on the break-up of Austria. Havlíček, who in 1846 began to publish the
first national Czech newspaper, wrote on May 7, 1848, when inviting the Poles
to attend the Pan-Slav Congress in Prague:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"An understanding between us--the Czecho-Slovaks and
the Poles--would be to the mutual advantage of both nations, especially under
the present circumstances when everything, even the break-up of Austria, may be
anticipated. I am sure that if the government continues to pursue its present
policy, Austria will fall to pieces before next winter and the Czechs are not
going to save her. The Czecho-Slovaks, Poles and Yugoslavs, united politically
and supporting each other, will surely sooner or later attain their object, which
is to obtain full independence, national unity and political liberty."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>It is characteristic of Austria that during the present war
she has prohibited the circulation of this article written seventy years ago.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Similarly, also, Palacký in his letter to Frankfurt,
explaining why the Czechs would not attend the Pan-German Parliament, made it
clear that he had no illusions about the good-will of Austria to adopt a just
policy towards her nationalities:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"In critical times we always saw this state, destined
to be the bulwark against Asiatic invasions, helpless and hesitating. In an
unfortunate blindness this state has never understood its true interests,
always suppressing its moral duty to accord to all races justice and equality
of rights."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>At the Pan-Slav Congress presided over by Palacký, Bakunin,
the Russian revolutionary, openly advocated the dismemberment of Austria in the
interests of justice and democracy, and proposed a free Slav federation in Central
Europe.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Pan-Slav Congress, in which also the Poles and Yugoslavs
participated, issued a manifesto to Europe on June 12, 1848, proclaiming the "liberty, equality and fraternity of nations." It ended prematurely by
the outbreak of an abortive revolt in Prague, provoked by the military, which
resulted in bloodshed and in the re-establishment of reaction and absolutism.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>2. In the first Austrian Parliament of 1848, eighty-eight
Czech deputies formed a united <i>Nationalist Party</i> (later on called the <i>Old
Czech Party</i>), led by Palacký, Rieger and Brauner. They formed the Right
wing which stood for democratic and federalist ideals. The Left was formed by
the Germans who stood for centralism and a close union with Germany. Only an
insignificant number of Germans formed the Centre which stood for the
preservation of Austria.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In October, 1848, fresh troubles broke out in Vienna, partly
directed against the presence of the Czechs. On November 15, the parliament was
summoned to Kremsier, in which the Czechs, Ruthenes, Yugoslavs and some Poles
formed a Slav <i>bloc</i> of 120 members. On December 2, Francis Joseph
ascended the throne, and a constitution was proposed by a parliamentary
committee of which Rieger was a member. The proposal was opposed by the
government, because it defined "the people's sovereignty as the foundation
of the power of the State," and not the dynasty. On March 6, 1849, the parliament was dissolved and a constitution imposed by an imperial decree.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The <i>Czech Radical Democrats</i>, led by Frič, Sabina
and Sladkovský, who already in 1848 stood for a more radical policy than that
of the Liberal Nationalists led by Palacký, now again thought of organising an
armed revolt against Austria. But the leaders of the conspiracy were arrested
and sentenced to many years' imprisonment. After the Austrian victories in Italy
and the collapse of the Hungarian revolution, absolutism again reigned supreme.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>During the ten years that followed, Bach tried, relying upon
the army and the hierarchy, to centralise and germanise the empire. In January,
1850, Havlíček's <i>Národní Noviny</i> was suppressed and later, also,
three of the other remaining Czech journals. Palacký openly declared that he
abandoned political activity and Rieger went abroad. Havlíček continued to
work for the national cause under great difficulties, until he was arrested in
December, 1851, and interned without a trial in Tyrol where he contracted an
incurable illness to which he succumbed in 1856. Even as late as 1859 the
Czechs were not allowed to publish a political newspaper.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>3. After the defeats at Magenta and Solferino in 1859, Austria
began to see the impossibility of a continued rule of terrorism and absolutism.
Bach was obliged to resign, and on March 5, 1860, a state council was summoned
to Vienna. Bohemia was represented only by the nobility who had no sympathy
with the Czech national cause, and on September 24 the Rumanian delegate,
Mosconyi, openly deplored the fact that "the brotherly Czech nation was
not represented."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The era of absolutism was theoretically ended by the
so-called "October Diploma" of 1860, conferring on Austria a
constitution which in many respects granted self-government to Hungary, but
ignored Bohemia, although formally admitting her historical rights. This
"lasting and irrevocable Constitution of the Empire" was revoked on February 26, 1861, when Schmerling succeeded Goluchowski, and the so-called "February
Constitution" was introduced by an arbitrary decree which in essence was
still more dualistic than the October Diploma and gave undue representation to
the nobility. The Czechs strongly opposed it and sent a delegation on April 14
to the emperor, who assured them on his royal honour of his desire to be
crowned King of Bohemia.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In the meantime Dr. Gregr founded the <i>Národní Listy</i>
in Prague in November, 1860, to support the policy of Rieger, and in January,
1861, the latter, with the knowledge of Palacký, concluded an agreement with
Clam-Martinic on behalf of the Bohemian nobility, by which the latter,
recognising the rights of the Bohemian State to independence, undertook to
support the Czech policy directed against the centralism of Vienna. The
Bohemian nobility, who were always indifferent in national matters and who had
strong conservative and clerical leanings, concluded this pact with the Czech
democrats purely for their own class interests This unnatural alliance had a
demoralising influence on the Old Czech Party and finally brought about its
downfall.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czechs elected two delegates to the parliament summoned
for April 29, 1861, while Hungary and Dalmatia sent none, so that the
parliament had 203 instead of 343 deputies. In the Upper House the Czechs were
represented by Palacký. In the Lower House the Slavs, forming a united body,
again found themselves in a hopeless minority which was absolutely powerless
against the government. In June, 1863, the Czechs decided not to attend the
chamber again, seeing that all hopes of a modification of the constitution in
the sense of the October Diploma were in vain. The government replied by
depriving them of their mandates and by suspending the constitution in 1865. A
period of "Sistierung," that is of veiled absolutism, then set in.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>4. In the meantime, a new political group came to the front
in Bohemia, called the Young Czechs. The party was led by Sladkovský, and had
more democratic leanings than the Old Czechs. In the diet, however, the Czechs
remained united in a single body. The Young Czechs opposed the policy of
passive resistance which the Old Czechs pursued for fully sixteen years, that
is up to 1879. The Young Czechs clearly saw that it enabled Vienna to rule
without the Czechs and against them. The Czechs, of course, still reckoned upon
the break-up of Austria, although, as we shall see later on, they failed entirely
to profit from Austria's difficulties in that period. In 1865 Rieger openly
warned Austria:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Those who direct the destinies of Austria should
remember that institutions based on injustice and violence have no duration. If
you desire to save Austria, the whole of Austria, you must make justice the
basis of your policy towards the Slavs. Do not then say that we did not warn
you. <i>Discite justitiam moniti</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In the same sense also Palacký warned the government against
dualism, pointing out that if it were introduced it would inevitably lead to
the break-up of Austria. Seeing that Austria did not listen to his warning, he
later on declared that he no longer believed in the future of Austria, and
added: "We existed before Austria, we shall also exist after her."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The greatest mistake the Czechs made was when in 1866, after
the battle of Sadova, they thought that Austria would cease to be the bulwark
of Pan-Germanism and would do justice to her subject Slavs, and thus become a
protection against Germany. It is true that Austria did cease to be the head of
the Pan-German Confederation, but instead of becoming a bulwark against Prussia,
she became her faithful ally and obedient tool. The Czechs, who feared lest
they should be annexed by Prussia, failed to grasp the subtle plans of Bismarck
who in a short time succeeded in converting Austria into Germany's bridge to
the East.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>When the victorious Prussians entered Prague in 1866, they
issued a proclamation to the Czechs recognising their right to independence.
This proclamation was probably drafted by the Czech exile J.V. Frič, an
ardent democrat who fled abroad after the abortive revolution of 1848.
Frič, who was a man of keen sense for political reality and a great friend
of the Poles, exerted all his influence with the Czech leaders to proclaim Bohemia
independent, without an armed revolt, simply by means of a plebiscite, as he
was aware that the masses were always thoroughly anti-Austrian and desired
nothing more than independence. He proposed to his fellow-countrymen to
establish a monarchy, with some other dynasty than the Habsburgs on the throne,
preferably the youngest son of the Italian king, Victor Emmanuel. Even while
peace negotiations between Prussia and Austria were going on, he conducted an
active propaganda and distributed a proclamation all over Bohemia in which he
declared himself as "the deadly enemy of the Habsburg dynasty and of
Austrian militarism and bureaucracy":</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Hungarians are preparing, the Yugoslavs are
ready. Let us come to a common agreement with them and we shall succeed. And
when all the Austrian nations have been freed they may form a great federation
on the basis of international law which will be an example to Europe. <i>A
federation without the freedom and independence of the nations who form part of
it is an empty dream. Let him who desires a federation work for the
independence of his nation first</i>. It is not a question of a revolution, it
is a question of a public proclamation of the Czech nation so that Europe may
realise that we live and what we want. Europe will surely lend us a helping
hand, but she expects us to ask for it. Let us therefore, my brother Czecho-Slovaks,
proclaim aloud, so that the whole world may hear us: '<i>We do not want </i><i>Austria</i><i>
because we realise that she not only does no good to us, but directly threatens
our very existence. We are able to and want to maintain an independent state
existence without Austria</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Unfortunately, however, the Czech leaders at that time did
not follow Frič's advice and, as we have already pointed out, they fell
into Bismarck's trap.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In November, 1866, the Bohemian Diet uttered a warning
against the danger of dualism, pointing out that Bohemia had the same right to
independence as Hungary. Relying upon the support of the other Slav races of Austria,
the Czechs declared they would never enter the Reichsrat.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In February, 1867, Beust concluded an agreement with Hungary,
and on December 21 the "December Constitution" was introduced. Thus <i>dualism</i>
became a <i>fait accompli</i>.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>5. Exasperated by this step, the Czech leaders visited Moscow
in the same year and fraternised with the Russians, thus showing their
hostility to Austria. In 1868 they published an eloquent declaration, written
by Rieger, declaring that they would never recognise dualism and emphasising Bohemia's
right to independence. When Francis Joseph visited Prague in the same year,
people left the city in crowds, anti-Austrian demonstrations were held
throughout the country, and flowers were laid on the spot where prominent
members of the Bohemian nobility had been executed by the Austrians in 1621.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Vienna answered by fierce reprisals. Baron Koller was sent
to Prague where a state of siege was proclaimed. Czech papers were suppressed,
and their editors imprisoned. This only strengthened Czech opposition. The
passive policy of the Old Czechs gained popularity and the Czechs did not even
attend the Bohemian Diet. Finally, when the Franco-Prussian War was imminent,
the dynasty was forced to yield, and Potocki began to negotiate with the
Czechs.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Meanwhile the Czechs again entered the Bohemian Diet on the
day of the battle of Sedan, August 30, 1870, and issued a declaration of rights
with which also the Bohemian nobility for the first time publicly identified themselves.
On December 8, 1870, the Czechs (without the nobility) presented the Imperial
Chancellor, Beust, with a memorandum on Austrian foreign policy, declaring
their sympathy with France and Russia and protesting against the annexation of
Alsace-Lorraine and against an alliance of Austria with Germany.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In February, 1871, Hohenwart was appointed Minister
President with the object of conciliating the Czechs, and Francis Joseph
addressed to them an imperial proclamation, called the "September
Rescript," in which he declared:--</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Remembering the constitutional ('Staatsrechtliche')
position of the Crown of Bohemia and the glory and power which the same has
lent to Us and Our ancestors, remembering further the unswerving loyalty with
which the population of Bohemia at all times supported Our throne, We gladly
recognise the rights of this Kingdom and We are ready to acknowledge this
recognition by Our solemn Royal Oath."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>It is well known, of course, that Francis Joseph did not
keep his word and was never crowned King of Bohemia.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>6. In answer to the rescript, the Czechs formulated their
demands in the so-called "fundamental articles," the main point of
which was that the Bohemian Diet should directly elect deputies to the
delegations. The <i>Národní Listy</i> declared that the "fundamental
articles" meant minimum demands, and that the Czechs would in any case work
"for the attainment of an independent Czecho-Slovak state, as desired by
the whole nation."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>At this stage Berlin and Budapest intervened. The emperor
yielded to the advice of William I. and Andrassy, and signed an unfavourable
reply to the Czech address on October 30, 1871. Czech opposition was now openly
directed against the dynasty. Hohenwart resigned on October 27. In November,
Baron Koller was again appointed Governor of Bohemia and repressive methods of
administration were once more introduced.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In 1873 elections were held, marked by violence and
corruption. Notwithstanding the passive resistance of Czech deputies, the
parliament continued to meet in Vienna. In 1878 Austria occupied Bosnia and
thus inaugurated the conquest of the Balkans for Germany. In 1879 Count Taaffe
at last induced the Czechs to abandon their policy of "passive
resistance" and to enter the parliament in return for some administrative
and other concessions, including a Czech university. On September 9, the
Czechs, united in a party of fifty-two members, entered the Reichsrat to
maintain their protest against the dual system.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>7. In parliament it became clear that the Old Czech Party,
now led by Rieger, was inclined to be too conservative and too opportunist. In
1887 the Young Czechs left the national party and entered into opposition.
Their party grew steadily, and during the elections in 1889 gained a decided
victory in the country districts. The Old Czechs finally sealed their fate
when, in 1890, they concluded an unfavourable agreement with the Germans,
called the <i>punctations</i>, to the detriment of Czech interests and of the
integrity of Bohemia. This roused popular indignation throughout Bohemia and
brought about the complete collapse of the Old Czech Party.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>At the same time the so-called <i>"Realist"
movement</i> originated in Bohemia, led by Professor Masaryk, Professor Kaizl
and Dr. Kramář. It was not a separate party movement, but a philosophic
effort for a regenerated democratic national policy. The Realists demanded a
practical, forward movement, such as would at last secure independence for the
Czechs. In 1890 the Realists published their programme and joined the Young
Czechs. This meant the end of the political career of Rieger and the Old
Czechs.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>8. In parliament the Young Czechs inaugurated a radical
anti-German policy. In 1891 they openly attacked the Triple Alliance, and in
1892 Dr. Menger called Masaryk a traitor for his outspoken defence of the right
of Bohemia to independence.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>A <i>Radical movement</i> was also started at this time in Bohemia,
mainly by students and advanced workers of the Young Czech Party, which called
itself "Omladina" (Czech word for "youth"). Its object was
to rouse the young generation against Austria. In 1893 anti-dynastic
demonstrations were organised by the "Omladina." A state of siege was
proclaimed in Prague and seventy-seven members of this "secret
society" were arrested; sixty-eight of them, including Dr. Rašín,
were condemned for high treason, and sentenced to long terms of imprisonment.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In 1893 Professor Masaryk, realising the futility of his
efforts against the encroachments of Germanism, resigned his mandate and
devoted his energies to scientific and philosophical work. In 1900, however, he
founded a party of his own, with a progressive democratic programme.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In the elections to the Bohemian Diet in 1895, the Young
Czechs gained eighty-nine seats out of ninety-five; in the Moravian Diet
seventeen seats were held by the <i>People's Party</i>, corresponding to the
Young Czech Party in Bohemia, thirteen by the Old Czechs and five by the Clericals.
In 1896 Badeni made an attempt at enfranchising the masses; seventy-two
additional deputies were to be elected by universal suffrage. In these
elections the Young Czechs again won in Bohemia. In Moravia the People's Party
concluded a compromise with the Old Czechs and gained fifteen seats, the
Socialists gained three seats and the Clericals one. On entering the parliament
the Czechs again made a declaration of state right. In 1897 Badeni, a Pole,
issued his famous Language Ordinances, asserting the equality of the Czech and
German languages in Bohemia and Moravia. The Germans raised a fierce
opposition, supported by the Socialists, and the Reichsrat became the scene of
violent attempts on the part of the Germans to obstruct sittings by throwing
inkstands at the leader of the House and using whistles and bugles to make all
proceedings impossible. Badeni lost his head and resigned, and his decrees were
rescinded. The dynasty, afraid of a repetition of German obstruction, gave the
Germans a completely free hand in all matters of government.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>9. Owing to the rapid cultural, economic and industrial
development of Bohemia, the Czech party system began to expand. The <i>Czecho-Slav
Social Democratic Party</i>, founded in 1878, began to acquire increasing
influence. At first it was based on purely international socialism, and in 1897
it even opposed the national Czech demands. Later, seeing the duplicity of
their German comrades who recognised the state right of Finland and Hungary,
but not that of Bohemia, and who openly preached the necessity of assimilating
the Slavs, the Czech Socialists began to identify themselves more and more with
the national struggle for independence. They organised their own trade unions,
which brought them into open conflict with the Austrian Socialists. This
question was discussed at the Socialist International Conference at Copenhagen
in 1910. It is, moreover, on account of these differences on nationality
questions that the various Socialist parties of Austria have not met since
1905.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In April, 1898, the <i>Czech National Social Party</i>, led
by Klofáč, was formed in opposition to the Socialists. It was radically
nationalist, and consisted mainly of workmen, as it was evolved from the
workers' organisation in the Young Czech Party.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On January 6, 1899, the <i>Agrarian Party</i> was formed. It
was chiefly composed of farmers and peasants. It defended the interests of
their class and acquired considerable influence among them. In national matters
it subscribed to the programme of Bohemian independence, and its organs have
during the present war adopted a courageous anti-Austrian attitude.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In 1900 the so-called <i>State Right Party</i> was founded
by some of the members of the former "Omladina." It had a radical
programme and stood uncompromisingly against Austria, demanding independence
for Bohemia chiefly on the ground of her historic rights.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In the elections of 1901 the United Czech Club gained
fifty-three seats, the National Socialists four and the Agrarians five. But the
real influence of the various new parties began to appear only in 1907, after
the introduction of the universal suffrage which deprived the Young Czechs of
their predominance. The Reichsrat elected in 1907 consisted of 257 non-Slav and
259 Slav members, of whom 108 were Czechs. The result of the election in Bohemia,
Moravia and Austrian Silesia was as follows:--</p>
<p class=TablePlainText style='margin-top:12.0pt'>28 Agrarians</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>24 Social Democrats</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>23 Young Czechs</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>17 National Catholics</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>9 Radicals</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>4 Moravian People's Party</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>2 Realists</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>1 Independent Candidate.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>This result showed that the Young Czechs, owing to their
deficient organisation, had lost ground, especially among the country
population, which formed the bulk of the nation. Among the workers Socialist
doctrines were spreading with remarkable rapidity.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The parliamentary activity of the Czechs soon revealed to
them how vain were their hopes that a new era of democracy was dawning in Austria.
They soon found out that in Austria parliamentary institutions were a mere
cloak for absolutism and that all their efforts were doomed to failure.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czechs were strongly opposed to the annexation of Bosnia.
In 1909 Professor Masaryk gained a world reputation by his courageous defence
of the Yugoslav leaders, who were accused of high treason at Zagreb (Agram).
During the Friedjung trial it was again chiefly due to Professor Masaryk's
efforts that forgeries of the Vienna Foreign Office, intended to discredit the
Yugoslav movement, were exposed and the responsibility for them fixed on Count
Forgach, the Austro-Hungarian minister in Belgrade. Professor Masaryk clearly
saw that Austria aimed at the conquest of the Balkans and intended at all costs
to crush Serbia.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>10. In 1911 new elections to the Reichsrat took place with
the following result for the Czechs:--</p>
<p class=TablePlainText style='margin-top:12.0pt'>40 Agrarians</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>25 Social Democrats</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>14 Young Czechs</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>13 National Socialists</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>7 Radicals</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>7 Clericals</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>1 Old Czech</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>1 Socialist (Centralist).</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Radicals (four Moravian People's Party, two State Right
Party, one Realist) formed a party of independent deputies with Professor
Masaryk at their head. They demanded full independence for Bohemia, some of
them laying greater stress on her historical rights, some on the natural right
of Czecho-Slovaks to liberty.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The whole group of Czech deputies stood in opposition
against Vienna with the exception of Kramář, who tried to imitate the
Polish positivist policy in the hope of obtaining concessions in return. But,
as we have already shown in a previous chapter, Dr. Kramář abandoned this
policy even before the war, when he saw how completely Austria was tied to Germany.
The bulk of the Czech people were, of course, always solidly anti-Austrian.
During the Balkan War the Czechs openly showed their sympathies with their
brother Slavs who were struggling for liberty.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The <i>Clerical Party</i> had comparatively little influence
and prestige. All their deputies (seven) were elected in country districts of Moravia,
where civilisation is comparatively less developed than in Bohemia. In Bohemia
and in the more developed districts of Moravia, people resist the efforts of
the clergy to mix religion with politics. The three million Slovaks in Hungary,
who speak a dialect of Czech and who form with the Czechs a single
Czecho-Slovak nation, had only two deputies (Dr. Blaho and Father Juriga), and
were without any influence in the Budapest Parliament.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>11. Although many Czech politicians foresaw that Austria's
anti-Serbian policy in the Balkans and her increasing dependence on Germany
must lead to war, yet on the whole the Czechs were not prepared for this
contingency. The Reichsrat was closed when war broke out, and the Diet of
Bohemia had been replaced by an Imperial Commission in 1913. War was declared
by Austria against the will of the Slavs, and yet they did not dare to protest,
as an organised revolution was impossible in view of the presence of German
troops and of the perfect police spy system in Austria. Two German divisions
would have been sufficient to suppress the best organised revolutionary
movement in Bohemia.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The immediate effect of the declaration of war was the unity
of the whole Czech nation. One of the leaders, Professor Masaryk, escaped
abroad, and is at the head of the Czecho-Slovak Government, recognised by the
Allies as the trustee and representative of the Czecho-Slovak nation.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Political activity was of course out of the question until
the Reichsrat reopened on May 30, 1917. Before that date there was an absolute
reign of terror in Bohemia. Some of the leading Czech newspapers were suspended
soon after the outbreak of the war. The few Slovak papers published in Hungary
were suppressed at the same time.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Those newspapers which survived were subject to strict
censorship and were compelled to publish leading articles written by government
officials and supplied to them by the police. Dr. Kramář, one of the most
prominent Czech leaders, his colleague Dr. Rašín, and five National
Socialist deputies were thrown into prison, and some of them even sentenced to
death.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The effect of these persecutions was that all the
Czecho-Slovaks became unanimous in their desire to obtain full independence of Austria-Hungary.
Old party differences were forgotten and some of the Czech deputies who had
formerly been opportunist in tendency, such as Dr. Kramář and the Agrarian
ex-minister Prášek, now at last became convinced that all hopes of an
anti-German Austria were futile, that Austria was doomed, as she was a blind
tool in the hands of Germany, and that the only way to prevent the ten million
Czecho-Slovaks from being again exploited in the interests of German
imperialism was to secure their complete independence. On entering the
Reichsrat on May 30, 1917, all the Czech deputies, united in a single
"Bohemian Union," made a unanimous declaration that it was their aim
to work for the union of all Czechs and Slovaks in an independent, democratic
state. To-day Dr. Kramář is in complete agreement with the Radicals who
formerly were his most bitter opponents. In fact four Czech nationalist parties
(the Young Czech, Realist, State Right and Moravian People's Parties) united in
February, 1918, as a single body under the name of "The Czech State-Right
Democracy." The president of its executive is the former Young Czech
leader Dr. Kramář, who was sentenced to death in 1916, but released in
July, 1917. The executive committee of the new party included all the leaders
of the four former parties, namely, Dr. Stránský, Dr. Herben, M. Dyk, Professor
Drtina, and others.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In their proclamation published in the <i>Národní Listy</i>
of February 10, 1918, the executive declared that:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The chief aim of the new party will be to engage in a
common national effort for the creation of an independent Bohemian State, the
fundamental territory of which will be composed of the historical and
indivisible crown-lands of Bohemia and of Slovakia. The Bohemian State will be
a democratic state. All its power will come from the people. And as it will
come from the Czech people, it will be just towards all nationalities, towards
all citizens and classes."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In a speech to the Young Czech Party before its dissolution,
Dr. Kramář openly declared that "at the moment of the outbreak of the
war it became quite clear that, despite all tactics of opportunism, our party
remained true to the programme of Czech independence. It became at once evident
to all of us that <i>the chapter of our former policy was forever closed for us</i>.
We felt with our whole soul that the Czech nation would not go through the
sufferings of the world war only to renew the pre-war tactics of a slow
progress towards that position to which we have full historical rights as well
as the natural rights of a living and strong nation...." And again, in an
article in the <i>Národní Listy</i> of December 25, 1917, Kramář wrote
under the heading "By Order of the Nation":</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We have sought with utmost sacrifice to find a
compromise between our just claims and the international situation which was
unfavourable to us. The war has completely changed all our policy, removing the
possibility of a compromise to which we might have been disposed, and we cannot
once more roll up our flag now so proudly unfurled, and put it aside for the
next occasion."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>As we shall show also later on, there is not the least doubt
that the necessity for the independence of Bohemia was proclaimed not by a few
extremists, but by all the Czech parties with the approval of the entire
nation.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>When Kramář in 1917 again took over the leadership of
the Young Czech Party, which led to the amalgamation of four nationalist
parties, a change took place also in the leadership of the Czech Social
Democratic Party which hitherto was in the hands of a few demagogues and
defeatists, such as Šmeral, who dominated the majority of the members. The
return of the Socialist Party to its revolutionary traditions and its entire
approval of the Bohemian state right and the national policy of Czecho-Slovak
independence means a complete and absolute consolidation of the whole Czech
nation.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>As the Social Democrats became quite loyal to the Czech
cause, the National Socialist Party lost its <i>raison d'être</i>. Owing to the
great sufferings of the working class during the war, it became imbued with
Socialist ideas.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On April 1, 1918, the Czech National Socialist Party held
its eighth annual conference in Prague, at which it adopted a resolution
endorsing international Socialism and changing its name to "The Czech
Socialist Party." The conference was attended also by two representatives
of the Czecho-Slav Social Democratic Party, J. Stivin and deputy Němec.
The National Socialist leader, deputy Klofáč, welcomed the representatives
of the Social Democrats "whom we have for years past been struggling
against, but with whom the trials of this war have united us." He declared
that his party accepted the Socialist programme and would join the new
Socialist International. On September 6, 1918, the executive committees of the
two parties elected a joint council. Its object is to work for the
consolidation of the Czech working classes and for the formation of a united
Czech Labour Party, composed of Social Democrats as well as of the former
National Socialists. A similar process of consolidation is taking place also
among the other parties, so that soon there will probably be only three Czech
parties, on the basis of class difference, viz. Socialists, Agrarians and
Democratic Nationalists (<i>bourgeoisie</i>), all of whom will stand behind the
programme of full Czecho-Slovak independence.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The most significant demonstration of the Czech national
sentiment took place at Prague on January 6, 1918, at a meeting of all the
Czech deputies of the Reichsrat and of the diets of Bohemia, Moravia and
Austrian Silesia, with which we deal in another chapter, and at which a
resolution was unanimously carried demanding full independence and
representation at the peace conference.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Finally, on July 13, 1918, a National Council or Committee
was formed in Prague on which all the parties are represented and which may
rightly be described as part of the Provisional Government of Bohemia.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The whole Czech nation to-day is unanimously awaiting the
victory of the Entente, from which it expects its long-cherished independence.
The Czecho-Slovaks are only waiting for a favorable opportunity to strike the
death-blow at the Dual Monarchy.</p>
<p class=Chapter><a name=Terrorism>IV</a></p>
<p class=ChapterDescription>TERRORISM IN BOHEMIA DURING THE WAR</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Austria-Hungary declared war not only on her enemies outside
her frontiers, but also on her internal enemies, on her own Slav and Latin
subjects. From the very first day of war terrorism reigned supreme in Bohemia,
where the Austrian Government behaved as in an enemy country. Three political
parties (the National Socialist, Radical and Realist Parties) were dissolved
and their organs suppressed. Fully three-quarters of all Czech journals and all
Slovak journals were suspended. Political leaders were arrested, imprisoned,
and some of them even sentenced to death. Many leaders have been imprisoned as
hostages in case an insurrection should break out. Over 20,000 Czech civilians
have been interned merely for being "politically suspect," and about
5000 were hanged in an arbitrary way by military tribunals, since juries had
been abolished by an imperial decree. Other Slav districts were no better off:
the Polish Socialist deputy Daszynski stated in the Reichsrat that 30,000
persons were hanged in Galicia alone, and another deputy stated that the number
of Slavs (Austrian subjects) who were executed by Austria exceeded 80,000.
Czech troops were marched to the trains watched by German soldiers like
prisoners of war. Thousands of them were massacred at the front. The property
of those who surrendered was confiscated, while the families of those Czech
leaders who escaped abroad were brutally persecuted. It is impossible for us to
give a detailed description of all the persecutions committed by Austria on the
Czecho-Slovaks, but the following is a brief summary of them:--</p>
<p class=Section><a name=LeadersImprisoned><i>(a) Czech Deputies and Leaders
imprisoned and sentenced to Death</i></a></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The most important perhaps was <i>the case of Dr.
Kramář,</i> one of the most moderate of the Czech leaders. Dr. Kramář
was arrested on May 21, 1915, on a charge of high treason as the leader of the
Young Czechs; together with him were also arrested his colleague, deputy Dr.
Rašín, Mr. Červinka, an editor of the <i>Národní Listy</i>, and
Zamazal, an accountant. On June 3, 1916, all four of them were sentenced to
death, although no substantial proofs were produced against them. Subsequently,
however, the sentence was commuted to long terms of imprisonment, but after the
general amnesty of July, 1917, they were released. Among the reasons for which
they were imprisoned and sentenced to death were the following, as given in the
official announcement, published in the Austrian press on January 4, 1917:</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Dr. Kramář before the war was "the leader of
Pan-Slav propaganda and of the Russophil movement in Bohemia." He was also
alleged to have kept up a connection with the pro-Ally propaganda conducted by
the Czecho-Slovaks and their friends abroad during the war, and the Czech
military action against Austria on the side of the Entente. Dr. Kramář was
further blamed for the "treasonable" behaviour of Czech regiments who
voluntarily surrendered to Russia and Serbia, and for the anti-German
sentiments cherished by the Czecho-Slovaks for centuries past. Obviously in
striking Dr. Kramář Austria meant to strike at the Czech nation. The
"proofs" for the high treasonable activity of Dr. Kramář before
and during the war were the following:[1]</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>(1) Dr. Kramář was (before the war) in communication
with Brancianov, Bobrinski, Denis, Masaryk, Pavlů and others, who now
preach the dismemberment of Austria-Hungary.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>(2) In his articles in the <i>Národní Listy</i>, published
during the war, Dr. Kramář advocated the liberation of small nations as
proclaimed by the Entente. His organ, "the <i>Národní Listy</i>, laid
special stress on news favourable to our enemies and on the state of disruption
of Austria, and indirectly invited Czechs to passive resistance."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>(3) A copy of <i>La Nation Tchèque</i> was found in Dr.
Kramář's pocket at the time of his arrest.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>(4) Dr. Kramář had a conversation with the Italian
consul in April, 1915, which is "an important cause of suspicion."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>(5) In a letter to the Governor of Bohemia, Prince Thun, Dr.
Kramář admitted that, always faithful to his political principles, he
refrained from everything that might appear as approval of the war.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>This was the evidence brought up against Kramář, on the
ground of which he was to be hanged. These are the "proofs" of his
responsibility for the distribution of treasonable Russian proclamations in Bohemia,
repeated manifestations of sympathy with the enemy, and the refusal of Czech
deputies to take part in any declarations or manifestations of loyalty.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Equally characteristic is also <i>the case of the National
Socialist leader, deputy Klofáč</i>, who was arrested in September, 1914.
Owing to lack of proofs the trial was repeatedly postponed, while Klofáč
was left in prison. A formal charge was brought against him only when the
Reichsrat was about to open in May, 1917, so as to prevent him from attending
the meeting. Nevertheless he was released after the amnesty of July, 1917.
Writing in the <i>Národní Politika</i> about his experience in prison, deputy
Klofáč says:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Many educated and aged political prisoners were not
allowed out to walk in the yard for five months or more, which is contrary to
all regulations. They were also not allowed to read books given to them by the
judge, and they had to do the lowest work. One student who refused to wash the
floor was beaten and confined to a dark cell. No wonder that many committed
suicide. Dr. Vrbenský could tell how he used to get excited by the cry of the
ill-treated prisoners. Even his nerves could not stand it. It is quite comprehensible,
therefore, that Dr. Scheiner (the president of the 'Sokol' Union) in such an
atmosphere was physically and mentally broken down in two months. Dr.
Kramář and Dr. Rašín also had an opportunity of feeling the brutality
of Polatchek and Teszinski. In the winter we suffered from frosts, for there
was no heating. Some of my friends had frozen hands. We resisted the cold by
drilling according to the Müller system. This kept us fit and saved us from
going to the prison doctor, Dr. A. Prinz, who was a Magyar and formerly a
doctor in Karlsbad. If a prisoner went to this 'gentleman,' he did not ask
after his illness, but after his nationality, and for the reason of his remand
imprisonment. On hearing that a prisoner was Czech and on remand for Par. 58<i>c</i>
(high treason), he only hissed: 'You do not want any medicine. It would be
wasted, for in any case you will be hanged.'"</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Besides Klofáč, the following four National Socialist
deputies were also imprisoned: Choc, Buřival, Vojna and Netolický. The
accused were condemned on July 30, 1916, for "failing to denounce
Professor Masaryk's revolutionary propaganda."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>Professor Masaryk</i>, who escaped abroad in 1915, was
sentenced to death in Austria in December, 1916. Unable to reach him, the
Austrian Government revenged themselves on his daughter, Dr. Alice Masaryk,
whom they imprisoned. Only after an energetic press campaign abroad was she
released. A similar fate also met the wife of another Czech leader, Dr.
Beneš, who escaped abroad in the autumn of 1915 and became secretary
general of the Czecho-Slovak National Council.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>Dr. Scheiner</i>, president of the "Sokol"
Gymnastic Association, was imprisoned, but was again released owing to lack of
proofs. A similar fate also met the Czech Social Democratic leader <i>Dr.
Soukup</i>, who was for some time kept in prison.</p>
<p class=Section><a name=MonsterTrials><i>(b) Monster Trials, Arbitrary
Executions, Internment of Civilians, etc</i>.</a></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>A notorious reason for imprisonment, and even execution, was
the possession of the so-called Russian Manifesto dropped by Russian
aeroplanes, being a proclamation of the Tsar to the people of Bohemia promising
them the restoration of their independence. Mr. Matějovský, of the Prague
City Council, and fifteen municipal clerks were sentenced to many years'
imprisonment for this offence in February, 1915. In May, 1915, six persons,
among them two girls, were condemned to death in Kyjov, Moravia, for the same
offence. On the same charge also sixty-nine other persons from Moravia were
brought to Vienna and fifteen of them sentenced to death. One of the Czech
girls who were executed for this offence was a Miss Kotíková, aged twenty-one,
who, according to the <i>Arbeiter Zeitung</i> of September 8, 1917, refused to say from whom she had received the manifesto, and through her heroic attitude
saved the lives of others.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Without a fair trial and without evidence, the editor of the
National Socialist organ <i>Pokrok</i> in Prostějov, Mr. Joseph Kotek, was
sentenced to death on Christmas Eve of 1914. The sentence was passed at noon,
confirmed at half-past four and carried out at half-past six. As no one could
be found to act as hangman, Kotek was shot. The reason given for the verdict
was that the accused editor of the <i>Pokrok</i>, which was suppressed as being
dangerous to the State, delivered a speech at a meeting of a co-operative
society in which he said that all Czechs were unanimous that they knew that
Austria was losing the war and that they prayed to God that her downfall might
be soon. He was further alleged to have said that it was doubtful how Europe
would be divided after the war, but that in any case the Czecho-Slovak
countries would be made independent as a wedge between Germany and Austria, and
that if Germany won the Czechs would be germanised, like the Poles in Germany.
The accused admitted that he did speak about the reorganisation of Europe, but
not in the words used by the prosecution. But, as the <i>Arbeiter Zeitung</i>
said, even if he did say what the prosecution alleged, as a civilian he should
never have been sentenced to death by a military tribunal. According to Czech
papers, Kotek was buried among ordinary criminals outside the cemetery. The
grave of the innocent martyr was not even marked with his name, and his wife
was not allowed to visit it, because the military authorities forbade the
sexton of the church to allow any one to see the graves of those executed for
high treason.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>Dr. Preiss</i>, the manager of the Czech bank,
Živnostenská Banka, which has its branches in Galicia, Rumania, Serbia and
elsewhere, and four of his colleagues were imprisoned, because the Czechs would
not subscribe to Austrian war loans and Dr. Preiss had done nothing to induce
them to do so.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>As regards the horrors of the internment camps, in which
over 20,000 innocent Czechs, men, women and children, were confined, we will
only quote the revelations of the Czech National Socialist deputy
Stříbrný, who declared in the Reichsrat on June 14, 1917:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"This war was begun by the Austrian Government without
the consent of the Austrian Parliament, against the will of the Czech people.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"In Bohemia, the most brutal cruelties have been
perpetrated by the Austrian authorities against the Czech population. An
anonymous denunciation suffices to bring about the arrest and imprisonment of
any Czech man, woman or child. Thousands of Czech citizens have simply been
seized and placed in internment camps on the ground that their political opinions
are dangerous to the existence of Austria.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Such prisoners were led away from their homes
handcuffed and in chains. They included women, girls and old grey-haired men.
They were conveyed from their homes to internment camps in filthy cattle trucks
and were cruelly ill-treated with a strange persistence. On one occasion
forty-three Czechs, who were being conveyed to a camp of internment, were
killed on the way by a detachment of Honveds (Hungarian militia) which was
escorting them to their place of imprisonment.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The conditions under which the Czechs were interned
at the Talerhof Camp, near Graz, were absolutely outrageous. They were beaten
and tortured on their way there. Immediately after their arrival many were tied
to stakes and kept thus day and night in absolutely indescribable sanitary
conditions. Many were done to death by their guards. When the thermometer
showed 20 degrees of frost, old men, women and girls were left to sleep in the
open air, and mortality increased amongst them to a frightful extent. Two
thousand unhappy victims of Austria's brutal tyranny lie buried in the cemetery
attached to the Talerhof Camp of internment. Of these, 1200 died of
epidemics."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Other information concerning the same camp of Talerhof fully
corroborates this statement. In a letter to his friends, a Czech interned at
Talerhof wrote as follows:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Many of my friends died from bayonet wounds; out of
12,000 at least, 2000 have so perished. The majority of us did not know why we
were interned. Many were hanged without a trial on mere denunciation. Human
life had no value for them. The soldiers had orders to strike us with bayonets
for the slightest movement....</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We were covered with insects. One day an order was
given that everybody should undress to be rubbed with paraffin. Some ladies who
objected were undressed by force before our eyes, since men and women slept
together, and the soldiers rubbed them with paraffin.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"A Ruthene who protested against the ill-treatment of
women, who were forced to do the lowest work, was bayonetted. He was lying for
five days between two barracks more dead than alive. His face and body were all
green and covered with lice and his hands were bound. Then the Austrian
officers and soldiers ill-treated him till he died."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In consequence of the general political amnesty, over
100,000 political prisoners in Austria were released. Thousands of them emerged
from prison or internment camps reduced to mere skeletons by the systematic
lack of food.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>According to reports published in the Austrian press, one of
the Ukrainian prisoners, named Karpinka, was left in solitary confinement
without any fire in winter, so that his feet were frost-bitten and had to be
amputated.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>A Czech named Jarý, who was condemned to twelve years' hard
labour, came out with consumption contracted through the rigour of his
imprisonment. Many others were reduced to such weakness through starvation that
they had to be carried out of the prison.</p>
<p class=Section><a name=PressPersecution>(c) <i>Persecution of the Press</i></a></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Among the Czech journals suppressed in Bohemia at the
beginning of the war, the following deserve to be especially mentioned:</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>České Slovo</i>, organ of the National Socialist
Party; the editors have been imprisoned. <i>Čas</i> ("Times"),
organ of Professor Masaryk (Realist Party); the editors Dušek and Hájek
were imprisoned. <i>Samostatnost</i>, organ of the State Right (Radical) Party;
the editors were imprisoned or sent to the front.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The <i>Národní Listy</i> (Kramář's organ) was twice
suspended, and in May, 1918, suppressed altogether because it "fostered
sympathies for the Entente."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The <i>Lidové Noviny</i>, organ of Dr. Stránský (Moravian
People's Party), was also several times suspended during the war.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>All Socialist journals were suppressed except <i>Právo Lidu</i>
and <i>Rovnost</i>.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>According to the <i>Wiener Zeitung</i>, seventy-eight Czech
journals were suspended during the months of April, May and June, 1916, alone.
All Slovak newspapers were also suppressed.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>As regards censorship, we need only mention that even
speeches delivered in the Austrian Parliament were censored in the press. The
sense of the speeches delivered by Allied statesmen was invariably distorted
and declarations in favour of Czecho-Slovak independence were suppressed.
Foreign newspapers were not allowed to be quoted; and the journals were forced
to publish unsigned articles supplied to them by the police....</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Union of Czech Journalists declared on April 25, 1917</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We protest against the practice prevailing in Prague
as against means quite contradictory to the moral principles of modern
journalism, as in Prague the newspapers are forced to publish articles supplied
by the Official Press Bureau, as though written by the editor, without being
allowed to mark them as inspired. Thus the journals are not in reality edited
by the editors themselves, but by the Press institution of the state."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The same union again protested on November 16, 1917</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"After the victorious Russian Revolution which brought
about also the opening of the Reichsrat, the fetters binding the Czech press
were a little relaxed, but only for a short time, and to-day we see the same
conditions prevailing in which we lived for the first three years of war. Every
free reflection in the Czech journals is confiscated. They are even prohibited
to publish articles which appeared in the German and Austrian press.
Furthermore, they are again compelled to publish articles written by officials
without marking them as such. They cannot even inform their readers correctly
about parliamentary debates, <i>as speeches and interpellations delivered in
parliament are suppressed</i>. We ask the Union of Czech Deputies to protest
again against this violation of parliamentary immunity, and to obtain a
guarantee that in future the Czech papers will not be compelled to print
articles not written by the editorial staff and that the Czech press shall
enjoy at least the same freedom as the press in Berlin, Vienna and Budapest."</p>
<p class=Section><a name=Interpellations><i>(d) Reichsrat Interpellations</i></a></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>To complete the picture of Austrian terrorism, we will quote
some of the interpellations addressed to the Austrian Government by Czech
deputies in the summer of 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czech deputies<i> Prokeš, Jaroš and Charvát</i>
(Socialists) have demanded an explanation from the Minister for Home Defence
respecting 300 Czech teachers from Moravia who were interned in 1915, being
suspected of disloyalty, although there was no charge made against them either
by the civil or by the military authorities. They were first interned in Lower
Austria and then in Hungary, and had to do the hardest work. Though the
educational authorities reclaimed them they were not set free even to attend to
the burials of their relatives. The only exception made was when one teacher
was allowed to be married in Vienna, and even then he was followed by the guard
with fixed bayonets. In Hungary the conditions were still worse, and many of
these teachers died and many of them are still in hospitals.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>A long interpellation was addressed to the government by the
Czech deputies<i> Biňovec, Filipinský and Stejskal</i> (Socialists)
regarding the outrageous and inhuman treatment of the Czech political
prisoners. They mentioned a vast number of appalling instances of deliberate
torturing and starving of the prisoners. All rights of the prisoners were
suspended and they depended entirely on the will of the commander: many of
these political prisoners were imprisoned together with ordinary murderers;
they were not allowed to read books or to write letters; their families were
not permitted to visit them or even to send them provisions from home, so they
starved in prison. Such cruel treatment did not affect only political prisoners
but even people on remand, and it was nothing extraordinary for them to be
imprisoned for years on remand only. The deputies asked whether the authorities
wanted these prisoners to die from starvation.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The most interesting document is the interpellation of
deputies <i>Staněk, Tobolka and Co</i>. on the persecutions against the
Czech nation during the war. The interpellation has been published as a book of
200 pages which has been prohibited by Austria to be sent abroad, but a copy of
which we have nevertheless been able to secure. The following are short
extracts from the volume:</p>
<p class=ChapterDescription>The Behaviour of the Austrian Government towards
the Czech Nation during the War</p>
<p class=MsoNormal> </p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"YOUR EXCELLENCY,--At a time when it proved impossible
to continue to rule in an absolute way in this empire and when after more than
three years the Reichsrat is sitting again, we address to you the following
interpellation in order to call your attention to the persecutions which during
the past three years have been perpetrated on our nation, and to demand
emphatically that these persecutions shall be discontinued. They were not done
unintentionally or accidentally, but, as will be shown from the following
survey, this violence was committed deliberately and systematically by the
Austrian Government on our nation, which took the abominable view that the
present war is the most suitable period for realising the plans and aims of
German centralism in the Habsburg Monarchy by curing the Czechs forever of all
hallucinations about equality among nations, and about the glorious past of
Bohemia and her relationship with other Slav nations. A general attack was made
upon the Czech nation during the critical situation created by the war: our
participation in civil service was curtailed, German was made the official
language of the state, the press was muzzled, schools persecuted, the Sokol
idea declared to be high treason, men distinguished for service in the state
arrested, imprisoned, persecuted and sentenced to death, everything reminding
the population of the famous past of Bohemia removed, the ancient Czech
aspirations for political independence or even aims for a mere reorganisation
of the Habsburg Monarchy on a federal basis were not allowed and were
suppressed, even the name of the ancient kingdom of Bohemia, which was the
foundation stone to the Habsburg Monarchy in 1526, was to disappear for ever.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The persecutions against our nation were very cruel
indeed.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"In the first place, <i>Dr. Kramář</i> was
attacked as the veritable leader of the Czech nation. In return for his
valuable services for this state and for his nation, in return for his
endeavours to educate the Czech nation towards realism in politics, he was
recompensed by being arrested, imprisoned and sentenced to death, although a
member of the delegations and therefore enjoying immunity. He was not brought
up before the ordinary tribunal, but before a judge who was absolutely ignorant
of Czech or foreign politics, so that his condemnation might be assured.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The same fate also met his political friends, deputy
Dr. Rašín and the editor of <i>Národní Listy</i>, V. Červinka.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Incredible proceedings were taken against the deputy
Klofáč. Although being a member of the delegations and therefore enjoying
immunity, he was arrested on September 7, 1914, and has been imprisoned ever
since. A charge was hurriedly prepared against him on May 24, 1917, that is when the Reichsrat was to be opened. Both Dr. Kramář and Klofáč were
prosecuted by the Vienna court-martial under the direction of Colonel Gliwitzki
and Dr. Preminger in such a way that no ordinary judge would dare to act.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The way in which the military tribunals treated the
ordinary uneducated people is apparent from the following examples:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The tailor Šmejkal in Vienna was sentenced to
six months' hard labour for saying, 'The government does not want to give us
Czech schools in Vienna.'</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"For saying, 'I do not know whether the Emperor
Francis Joseph was ever crowned King of Bohemia or not,' a boy gardener named
Tesař was sentenced to six months' hard labour, which sentence was altered
to sixteen months by the High Court of Justice (the poor boy died in prison).</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The shoemaker's assistant Hamouz, of Vienna,
sixty-seven years of age, ill and mentally stunted, served in his youth with
the 28th Regiment. He defended this regiment, therefore, by saying, 'It is a
good regiment.' He was sentenced to six months' imprisonment.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Private Čepera from Moravia was sentenced to
three years' hard labour for saying, 'The German Kaiser is responsible for the
war.'</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"For saying that 'those of the 28th Regiment are our
"boys,"' gunner Purs, of Benatky, was sentenced to four years'
imprisonment. He was sent in chains to the military prison in Möllersdorf.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The wilfulness of military tribunals, culminating in
many cases in apparent hatred against everything that is Czech, is shown by the
following, out of many examples:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The editor of <i>České Slovo</i>, E.
Špatny, of Prague, was arrested on September 26, 1914, and interned in Prague,
without being told the reason. In March, 1915, he was transferred to the
internment camp at Göllersdorf, in Lower Austria. The Czechs interned there
arranged on July 5 a Hus anniversary at which the editor E. Špatny and Dr.
Vrbenský spoke about the life and importance of Hus. Being accused by a certain
fellow-prisoner, Davidovský, that they had been speaking against the Germans
and that 'the speakers expected deliverance by a certain state but were
disappointed,' they were transferred to the military prison in Vienna, and
charged with high treason according to Par. 58<i>c</i>. The latter was
discharged for want of proofs, but the editor Špatny was sentenced to
fourteen years' hard labour.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Sarajevo prisoners were not allowed to be visited
by their relatives in contravention of the orders of the official statutes D 6.
Out of five of those prisoners, three have already died, the fourth is dying,
and the last one, a student Cubulič, was allowed a visit after two years
when it became certain that the Reichsrat would meet.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The extent to which starvation and inhuman treatment
is raging in the state prisons is best shown by the conditions prevailing in
the prison of Möllersdorf. In the years 1915-16, 61 prisoners died there out of
350 to 450 prisoners on the roll. Between January 1, 1917, and May, 1917, 101 prisoners were doomed to death. The majority belong to the sixth category
of prisoners. The thieves, criminals and impostors, if they had served
previously in the army, enjoy special treatment in Möllersdorf prison. They
wear civilian clothes, and are treated with consideration and well fed. On the
other hand, political prisoners, especially those classed as second category,
are dying from ill-treatment and insufficient nourishment. The judge, auditor
A. König, famous for his arbitrary verdicts against the Czech people, was a
solicitor's clerk in civil life, and now recommends to his wealthy defendants
his Vienna lawyer friends as splendid specialists and advocates in political
matters. Thus, for instance, he forced Dr. Glaser upon Mr. Kotik as the
counsel. Kotik was sentenced to death by König, and Glaser sent him a bill for
10,000 kronen (£400) for the 'successful defence.'</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>The Persecutions of the Sokols</i></p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Terrible persecutions were inflicted on the Sokol
Gymnastic Association during the war. The sphere of the Sokols' activity does
not touch political affairs at all, being reserved to gymnastics and spiritual
education. Their activity was public, open to official inquiries and
supervision. But this did not save them from persecutions. The first
persecution was already committed in 1914 in Moravia, when some branches of the
Sokol Association were dissolved for various reasons. Numerous societies were
afterwards dissolved throughout Bohemia and Moravia.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>On </i><i>November</i> 23, 1915, <i>the Central
Czech Sokol Association (Česká Obec Sokolska) was dissolved</i> as the
centre of the Czech Sokol movement, which before the war kept up lively
relations with foreign countries and manifested brotherly feelings of sympathy
towards Serbia and Russia. It was alleged that the Central Sokol Association
had had relations with the American Sokol branches during the war through its
president, Dr. J. Scheiner, and conducted an active propaganda against Austria.
The alleged relations were founded on a communication of the American branches
to the president, Dr. Scheiner, asking him whether he would be willing to
distribute money collected in America to people in Bohemia afflicted by the
war. Dr. Scheiner was arrested and kept in prison for two months.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Very characteristic was the way in which the military
authorities treated the members of Sokol societies. In many cases soldiers,
especially recruits, were questioned whether they belonged to the Sokol
Association. The authorities searched for Sokol badges or membership cards, and
those who were found to have these in their possession were severely punished.
The members of the Sokol societies as long as they were in the army were
invariably subjected to ill-treatment and persecution. They were transferred to
do heavy work, and not recommended for promotion, and in every way treated more
brutally than other soldiers. In the case of both civil and military trials,
one of the most important questions asked, was whether the accused belonged to
any Sokol society, and if the accused did belong to a society this always went
against him.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>Bohemian History</i></p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Every possible means was employed to wipe out the
memory of important events in Bohemian history. Not only were historical books
(like Lützow's <i>Bohemia</i> and others) confiscated, but even scientific
lectures on John Hus and the Hussite movement were prohibited. The metal
memorial plate with the names of Bohemian lords executed in 1621 inscribed upon
it was removed from the Town Hall, and that part of the square which showed the
spot on which they were executed was ordered to be repaved.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"In order to destroy the idea that the Czechs are of
Slav origin, any use of red, blue and white colours was prohibited. Varnishes
in these colours were not allowed to be used. The street plates of pre-war
times had to be repainted in black and yellow. Newspaper posters, match-boxes
and other articles were not allowed to be sold or exhibited, if they were painted
in the Slav tricolours.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>The Suppression of Czech Literature</i></p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"More than two hundred books published before the war
were confiscated. The tendency of this action was clear. The government wanted
to destroy the memory of the glorious past of Bohemia, of John Hus and the
Hussite movement, of the suffering of the Czech nation after the defeat of the
White Mountain, to restrict all progressive and liberal movements and to kill
the 'Sokol' idea, and further to destroy the consciousness that Czechs and Slovaks
are the same nation and belong to the great Slav family. The apostles of this
idea were proclaimed traitors, especially Dr. Kramář, J.S. Machar and
others. These persecutions cover a great period before the war, and the
following is a list of the books suppressed (follows a list comprising eleven
foolscap columns). The government treated the Czech nation with special
brutality. The persecutions in Bohemia were opposed not only to the liberal
ideas of Czechs, but especially to their national feelings. The anxiety of the
censor for the safety of the monarchy often bordered on absurdity. The word
'shocking' was deleted from a play, for instance, because it was English. <i>Henry
IV</i>. was not allowed to be played 'until we reach a settlement with England,'
and it was only when it was reported by the Vienna and Berlin papers that the
prohibition was withdrawn.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>Persecution of the Czech Press</i></p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Czech press was persecuted in a peculiar manner.
Its editors were not allowed to receive papers from neutral countries and to
express their own opinions as regards the propaganda of the Czechs abroad.
Under threats of suppression of the journals and imprisonment of the editors,
the journals were obliged to print and publish articles supplied to them by the
police, without mentioning the source from whence they came. The articles had
to be put in in such a way that they appeared as if they were the editors'
views. The articles betrayed the low intellectual level of the authors who
lacked any knowledge of Czech affairs. Such articles which the Czech journals
were compelled to publish were, for instance: 'In Foreign Pay,' published March 25, 1916; 'The Czechs in America against Masaryk's Agents,' published in all Czech
papers on April 8, 1916; on January 16, 1917, the article 'Our Answer to the
Quadruple Entente.'</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Police Directorate ordered first that such
articles should appear on the same day in all papers and in the same wording,
but recognising the stupidity of such an action, they compelled only one
journal to publish them and the others had to 'quote' from them.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Preventive censorship was established and a number of
articles were passed by the censor for publication in Czech papers only when
proofs were supplied that the articles had already appeared in some other
journal in Austria. <i>Independent articles or reports were not allowed to be
published</i>. The <i>Národní Listy</i> was treated with special spite by the
censorship.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>Almost ninety important journals were suppressed
by the government</i>, the majority of them without any apparent reason or
justification.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>The Suppression of </i><i>Czech</i><i> </i><i>School</i><i>
and National Literature</i></p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Words, sentences or whole paragraphs in school books
were found objectionable, since they were alleged to propagate Pan-Slavism and
to encourage in the pupils hostile feelings against Austria's allies. According
to the official ideas about Austrian patriotism, purely educational paragraphs
were considered as wanting in patriotic feeling; not only literary but also
historical paragraphs were 'corrected,' and official advice was issued as to
how to write handbooks on patriotic lines on special subjects, as for instance
on natural history, physics, geometry, etc. The foundations of all knowledge to
be supplied to the pupils in the public schools had to reflect the spirit of
the world war.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Numerous folk-songs with absolutely no political
tendency in them were confiscated, merely because they expressed the Czech
national spirit. All songs were suppressed which mentioned the word Slav--'The
Slav Linden Tree'--the army or the Allies. Even if the publishers offered to
publish new editions without the objectionable songs they were not allowed to
do so, and were asked to put in more 'loyal songs' and to replace melancholy
songs with cheerful ones.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"In every secondary school a zealous library revision
was started and many books were removed, so that these libraries lost all their
value for the students. The Czech youth must not know the principal works
either of their own or foreign literature. Certain libraries had to be deprived
of some hundreds of books. All this happened at a time when the discussions
here and abroad were taking place about the importance of raising the standard
of knowledge of the educated classes.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The opening of Czech minority schools has been
postponed since the beginning of 1914. Consequently the Czech School Society
must keep them up and pay the expenses in connection with them, amounting to a
loss of more than two million kronen up till now. On the other hand, many
German schools have been established in Bohemia.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The steps which are being taken against Czech schools
in Lower Austria, especially in Vienna, are not only contrary to the standing
laws but also to the decisions of the ministry concerned.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We conclude by asking:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Are the above facts of systematic persecution of the
Czech nation during the war known to your Excellency?</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Is your Excellency prepared to investigate them
thoroughly?</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Is your Excellency prepared to stop the persecution
of the Czech nation and the wrongs suffered by us through these proceedings?</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>In </i><i>Vienna</i><i>, </i><i>June</i> 6, 1917."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>[Footnote 1: For the full text of this document see Dr.
Beneš' <i>Bohemia's Case for Independence</i>.]</p>
<p class=Chapter><a name=AssistedAllies>V</a></p>
<p class=ChapterDescription>HOW THE CZECHO-SLOVAKS AT HOME ASSISTED THE ALLIES</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>From the foregoing chapters it is clear that by continuous
misrule and by the attempt to reduce the Czecho-Slovak nation to impotence
through terrorism and extermination during this war, the Habsburgs have created
a gulf between themselves and their Czecho-Slovak subjects which can never
again be bridged over. Realising this, and seeing that since Austria has
voluntarily sold herself to Berlin their only hope for a better future lies in
the destruction of the political system called Austria-Hungary, the
Czecho-Slovaks have from the beginning staked their all on the victory of the
Entente, towards which they have contributed with all possible means at their
disposal.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>1. Since they could not think of revolting, the
Czecho-Slovaks at home tried to paralyse the power of Austria in every way. Not
only individuals but also Czech banks and other institutions refused to
subscribe to the war loans. Their newspapers published official reports with
reluctance, and between the lines laid stress on news unfavourable to Austria
so as to keep up the spirit of the people. Czech peasants refused to give up
provisions, and thus the Czechs, who already before the war boycotted German
goods, accelerated the present economic and financial ruin of Austria.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>2. Politically, too, they contributed to the internal
confusion of the Dual Monarchy, and to-day their opposition forms a real menace
to the existence of Austria. Czech political leaders unanimously refused to
sign any declaration of loyalty to Austria, and they never issued a single
protest against Professor Masaryk and his political and military action abroad.
On several occasions they even publicly expressed their sympathies and approval
of this action. For nearly three years they prevented the opening of the
Austrian Parliament which would have been to their prejudice. Only after the
Russian Revolution, when Austria began to totter and her rulers were
apprehensive lest events in Russia should have a repercussion in the Dual
Monarchy, did the Czechs decide to speak out and exerted pressure to bring
about the opening of the Reichsrat, where they boldly declared their programme,
revealed Austria's rule of terror during the first three years of war, and by
their firm opposition, which they by and by induced the Poles and Yugoslavs to
imitate, they brought about a permanent political deadlock, menacing Austria's
very existence internally and weakening her resistance externally.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>3. But the most important assistance the Czechs rendered to
the Allies was their refusal to fight for Austria.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Out of 70,000 prisoners taken by Serbia during the first
months of the war, 35,000 were Czechs. Of these, 24,000 perished during the
Serbian retreat, and 8000 died of typhoid fever and cholera at Asinara. The
remaining 3000 were transferred to France and voluntarily joined the
Czecho-Slovak army.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Over 300,000 Czecho-Slovaks surrendered voluntarily to Russia
whom they regarded as their liberator. Unfortunately the old régime in Russia
did not always show much understanding of their aspirations. They were
scattered over Siberia, cut off from the outer world, and often abandoned to
the ill-treatment of German and Magyar officers. It is estimated that over
thirty thousand of them perished from starvation. It was only after great
efforts, after the Russian Revolution, and especially when Professor Masaryk
himself went to Russia, that the Czecho-Slovak National Council succeeded in
organising a great part of them into an army. Finally, when Austria desired to
strike a death-blow at Italy in 1918, and began again to employ Slav troops,
she failed again, and this failure was once more to a large extent caused by
the disaffection of her Slav troops, as is proved by the Austrian official
statements. Indeed, whenever Austria relied solely on her own troops she was
always beaten, even by the "contemptible" Serbians. The Czechs and
other Slavs have greatly contributed to these defeats by their passive
resistance. It was only the intervention of German troops which saved Austria
from an utter collapse in 1915, and which prevented the Czechs from completing
their aim of entirely disorganising the military power of Austria. Slav
regiments have since then been intermixed with German and Magyar troops. The
Slavs receive their ammunition only at the front, where they are placed in the
foremost ranks with Germans or Magyars behind them, so that they are exposed to
a double fire if they attempt to surrender. Nevertheless, up to 1916 some
350,000 Czechs out of a total of 600,000 in the Austrian army surrendered to
the Allies.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>4. From the very beginning of the war Czech soldiers showed
their real feelings. They were driven to fight against the Russians and Serbs
who were their brothers by race and their sincere and devoted friends. They
were driven to fight for that hated Austria which had trampled their liberties
underfoot for centuries past, and for a cause which they detested from the
bottom of their hearts. They were driven to fight in the interests of their
German and Magyar enemies against their Slav brothers and friends under
terrible circumstances.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In September, 1914, the 8th Czech Regiment refused to go to
the front until threatened by the German troops. The 11th Czech Regiment of
Pisek refused to march against Serbia and was decimated. The 36th Regiment
revolted in the barracks and was massacred by German troops. The 88th Regiment,
which made an unsuccessful attempt to surrender to Russia, was shot down by the
Magyar Honveds. A similar fate befell the 13th and 72nd Slovak Regiments.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On the other hand, many Czech troops succeeded in
surrendering. The 35th Regiment of Pilsen went over to the Russians in a body
half-an-hour after arriving at the front. Soon after, the 28th Regiment of
Prague surrendered <i>en masse</i>, having been "fetched" by the
Czechs fighting on the Russian side. Immediately afterwards the Austrian
commander-in-chief issued an order of the day in which he declared.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"On April 3, 1915, almost the whole of the 28th
Regiment surrendered without fighting to a single enemy battalion.... This
disgraceful act not only destroys the reputation of this regiment, but
necessitates its name being struck off the list of our army corps, until new
deeds of heroism retrieve its character. His Apostolic Majesty has accordingly
ordered the dissolution of this regiment, and the deposition of its banners in
the army museum."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>And indeed "new deeds of heroism" did follow. A
fresh battalion was founded composed of Czech youths who were sent to the
Isonzo front and exposed in a dangerous position to deadly artillery fire.
Almost the whole battalion was thus unscrupulously wiped out. Only eighteen of
them survived. This was followed by a new imperial order saying that the
disgrace of the 28th Regiment was "atoned for" by the
"sacrifice" of this regiment on the Isonzo.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>As regards Italy, over 20,000 Czechs surrendered voluntarily
on the Italian front up to 1917, and 7000 during the last offensive on the
Piave in June, 1918. Of recent cases we need mention only the "treachery
of Carzano," where, on September 18, 1917, some Czech officers went over
to the Italians, communicated to them the Austrian plans of campaign and led
them against the Austrians whose front was thus successfully broken through.
This incident was not the only one of its kind. It has been repeated several
times by Czech officers whenever they found an opportunity of going over to the
Italians. During the offensive of June, 1918, the Austrian press openly
attributed the Austrian failure to "Czech treachery," asserting that
the plan of the offensive was communicated to the Italian headquarters staff by
Czecho-Slovak officers. This the Austrian military authorities themselves
admitted later, when they published the following official statement, which
appeared in the German press on July 28:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"On the morning of June 15, we started a vigorous
offensive on the whole front between the Tyrolese mountains and the Adriatic,
with a power that can be attained only by complete co-operation of all the
units and with an accurate execution and a common and uniform action. But, just
at the beginning of the attack, it became apparent that the enemy were making a
counter-attack according to a well-defined plan, as in the case of a projected
vigorous offensive. It was also found out that the enemy was perfectly aware of
the extent, the day and the hour of our attack. The intended surprise, so
important for the success of an offensive, has thus failed. In due course Italy
also obtained, from documents which some deserters handed to the Italian high
command, information which gave her a sufficiently precise idea of our
dispositions. English, French and Italian officers and men captured by us
declare unanimously that their regiments were advised on the evening of June 14
that the Austrian offensive would start at two o'clock on the following
morning.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The exact time of the beginning of our offensive must
have been betrayed by <i>Yugoslav and Czech deserters</i>. The enemy took steps
against the bombardment by means of gas, which was expected. These steps later
proved insufficient. As an example we may mention only the following facts: The
battalion of bersaglieri received, at 3.20 on June 14, a quantity of ammunition
at 72 to 240 cartridges per man. The Pinerolo Brigade took up fighting position
at 2 o'clock at night. An order, captured late on July 14, said: 'According to
reports received, the enemy will commence early on June 15 their bombardment
preparations for attack. At midnight hot coffee and meat conserves will be
distributed. The troops will remain awake, armed and prepared to use their
gas-masks.'</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"For some time now the Italian command have tried to
disorganise our troops by high treasonable propaganda. In the Italian
prisoners-of-war camps the Slavs are persuaded by promises and corruption to
enlist in the Czecho-Slovak army. This is done in a way prohibited by law.
Their ignorance of the international situation and their lack of news from
home, partly caused by Italian censorship, are exploited by means of propaganda
without scruples. An order of the 5th Italian Army Corps (1658 Prot. R. J.) of May 14, 1918, refers to active propaganda by Czecho-Slovak volunteers with the object of
disorganising the Austro-Hungarian army. The Italian military authorities on
their part deceive the Czecho-Slovaks by telling them of the continuous
disorders and insurrections in Bohemia. In the above-mentioned order it is
asserted that in the corps to which it is addressed, as well as in other corps,
some attempts of the Czecho-Slovak elements have been successful in causing
confusion among enemy ranks. <i>Some of our Czecho-Slovak soldiers deserted and
went over to the Italians</i>. Others remained in touch with them and declared themselves
ready to stay in our positions as a source of ferment for future insurrections.
Although the high treason miscarried owing to the heroic resistance which our
troops, without distinction of nationality, offered to the enemy, it is
nevertheless true that some elements succumbed to the treacherous enemy
propaganda.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The gunner Rudolf Paprikar, of the machine gun
section, according to reports of the 8th Army Corps jumped off the river bank
into the Piave below Villa Jacur and swam across under danger of being drowned.
He betrayed the position, strength and composition of his sector, and through
observation and spying, he acquired some valuable information by which our
projected attack against Montello was disclosed. Further, he revealed to the
enemy some very secret preparations for the crossing of the river Piave, and
also supplied him with plans of the organisation of troops, battery positions,
etc.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The principal part in the treachery is attributed by
the Italian high command, not without reason, to Lieutenant Karel Stiny of an
infantry regiment, who deserted near Narenta. It appears from the detailed
Italian official report in which his statements are embodied, that he betrayed
all our preparations on the Piave and provided the enemy with a great deal of
most important information. Let us mention further that Stiny in his mendacious
statements to the Italian command about the Austro-Hungarian situation at the
front and in the interior, followed the line of all traitors in order to appear
in a favourable light. It is characteristic that in his declaration about our
offensive he said that many Austro-Hungarian troops would have surrendered if
it had not been for the German and Bulgarian bayonets behind their backs.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>It is proved by various documents to what extent
the Czechs have forgotten their honour and duty</i>. By breaking their oath to Austria
and her emperor and king, they have also forgotten all those who were with them
at the front, and they are responsible for the blood of our patriots and the
sufferings of our prisoners in Italy. The false glory which is attributed to
them by the Italian command, who have lost all sense of the immorality of these
proceedings, cannot efface the eternal crime which history always attaches to
the names of traitors."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>5. We could give many proofs of the great service the
Czecho-Slovaks rendered the Allies by their surrenders. But for our purpose it
will be sufficient to quote only some more admissions of the Germans and
Magyars themselves.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Count Tisza admitted that Czech troops could not be relied
upon, and Count Windischgrätz stated that the chief of staff dare not use them
except when mixed with Magyars and Germans.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Deputy Urmanczy declared in the Budapest Parliament on September 5, 1916, that during the first encounters with Rumania, a Czech regiment retired
without the slightest resistance, provided themselves with provisions, entered
a train and disappeared. The men went over to Rumania. He blamed the Czechs for
the Austrian reverse in Transylvania.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On June 22, 1917, when the case of deputy Klofáč was
discussed by the Immunity Committee of the Reichsrat, General von Georgi,
Austrian Minister for Home Defence, according to the Czech organ <i>Pozor</i>
of June 24, described</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"... the conditions prevailing in the army, especially
the behaviour of certain Czech regiments, and brought forward all the material
which had been collected against the Czechs since the outbreak of the war, and
which had been used against them. He referred to the 28th and 36th Regiments as
well as to eight other Czech regiments which had voluntarily surrendered to the
Russians. He mentioned also that Czech officers, not only those in reserve but
also those on active service, including some of the highest ranks of the staff,
surrendered to the enemy; in one instance fourteen officers with a staff
officer thus surrendered. Czech soldiers in the Russian and French armies, as
well as in other enemy armies, are fighting for the Entente and constitute
legions and battalions of their own. The total number of Czechs in the enemy
armies exceeds 60,000. In the prisoners' camps in the enemy countries,
non-German prisoners were invited to join the enemy's ranks. Czech legions and
battalions are composed almost entirely of former prisoners of war. The minister
further went on to describe the propaganda of the Czechs abroad, the activity
of Czech committees in enemy and neutral countries, especially in Russia and Switzerland.
He also mentioned the case of Pavlu, a Czech soldier, who in a Russian
newspaper described how he penetrated the Austrian trenches in the uniform of
an Austrian officer, annihilated the occupants and after a successful scouting
reconnaissance returned to the Russian ranks. The minister described the
attitude of the 'Sokols' and the Czech teachers. The tenor of his speech was
that Klofáč is responsible for the anti-Austrian feeling of the Czech
nation and that therefore he should not be released."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>When the Russian offensive of July, 1917, started, Herr
Hummer, member of the Austrian Reichsrat, addressed the following
interpellation to the Austrian Minister for Home Defence:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Is the Austrian Minister for Home Defence aware that
in one of the early engagements of the new Russian offensive, the 19th Austrian
Infantry Division, which consists almost entirely of Czecho-Slovaks and other
Slavs, openly sided with the enemies of Austria by refusing to fight against
the Russians and by surrendering as soon as an opportunity offered
itself?"</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The most interesting document in regard to the attitude of Czecho-Slovaks
during the war is the interpellation of ninety German Nationalist deputies
(Schurf, Langenhahn, Wedra, Richter, Kittinger and others), of which we possess
a copy. It contains 420 large-size printed pages, and it is therefore
impossible for us to give a detailed account of it. The chapters of this
interpellation have the following headings:</p>
<p class=MsoList>1. The dangers of Pan-Slavistic propaganda.</p>
<p class=MsoList>2. The situation at the outbreak of the war.</p>
<p class=MsoList>3. Motives for the arrest of Kramář.</p>
<p class=MsoList>4. The behaviour of Czechs in Austria:</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(a)</i> Demonstrations of Czech national spirit in Prague;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(b)</i> Czech school-books;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(c)</i> Czech officials;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(d)</i> The activities of the "Sokols";</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(e)</i> What happened at Litomeřice and elsewhere;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(f)</i> The Czech attitude towards war loans;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(g)</i> The Živnostenská Banka and the war loans;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(h)</i> The financial policy of the Živnostenská Banka;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(i)</i> The Czechs and war emergency affairs;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(k)</i> The Czechs and the question of food supplies.</p>
<p class=MsoList>5. The anti-Austrian attitude of Czechs abroad:</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(a)</i> In France;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(b)</i> In England;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(c)</i> In Russia;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(d)</i> In America;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(e)</i> In Switzerland;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(f)</i> The campaign of Professor Masaryk;</p>
<p class=MsoList2><i>(g)</i> The Czech secret intelligence service.</p>
<p class=MsoList>6. The conduct of Czech soldiers on the battlefield.</p>
<p class=MsoList>7. Military consequences.</p>
<p class=MsoList>8. Some recent documents.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>According to the <i>Neue Freie Presse</i> of June 6, 1918, the Austrian Minister for Home Defence made the following important
admissions in reply to the part of this interpellation concerning the Czech
contribution to the defeats of Austria:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The 36th Regiment, according to unanimous reports of
the high command, failed to do its duty in May, 1915, on the Russian front, and
thereby caused a heavy defeat of other detachments. This regiment was dissolved
by the imperial decree of July 16, 1915.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The unsuccessful fighting and heavy losses of the
19th Division in the battle north of Tarnopol between September 9 and 11, 1915,
were caused by the weak resistance of the 35th Regiment.... During the battles
of June 29 to July 2, 1917, near Zloczow the resistance offered by this
regiment was weak.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"As regards Regiment No. 28 of Prague, according to
the statement of regimental commanders, it appears that the whole detachment,
without firing a single shot, was taken prisoner by a single enemy battalion,
or rather was brought by that battalion from its position."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>And in this policy Czech soldiers continue by surrendering
voluntarily to the Entente troops whenever they have the opportunity.</p>
<p class=Chapter><a name=ActionsAbroad>VI</a></p>
<p class=ChapterDescription>THE MILITARY AND POLITICAL ACTION OF THE CZECHO-SLOVAKS
ABROAD</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>When war broke out, the Czecho-Slovaks all over the world
felt it their duty to prove by deeds that their place was on the side of the
Entente. The Czecho-Slovaks in Great Britain, France and Russia volunteered to
fight for the Allies, while in the United States of America, where there are
some one and a half million Czecho-Slovaks, they have counteracted German
propaganda and revealed German plots intended to weaken the American assistance
to the Allies.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>1. In France 471 Czechs, <i>i.e.</i> over 60 per cent.,
entered the Foreign Legion and greatly distinguished themselves by their
bravery. The majority of them have been mentioned in dispatches and received
the Military Cross. They have also won five crosses and twenty medals of the
Russian Order of St. George. Their losses amount to more than 70 per cent.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Further, many Czechs living in Great Britain at the outbreak
of the war joined the French Foreign Legion in France, and after His Majesty's
Government allowed Czechs to volunteer for service in the British army in the
autumn of 1916, practically all Czechs of military age resident in Great
Britain enrolled so far as they were not engaged on munitions. In Canada, too,
the Czechs joined the army in order to fight for the British Empire.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The most important part was taken, however, by the
Czecho-Slovak colonies in Russia and America. In Russia, where there are large
Czecho-Slovak settlements, numbering several thousand, a Czecho-Slovak legion
was formed at the outbreak of the war which has rendered valuable services,
especially in scouting and reconnoitring. This legion grew gradually larger,
especially when Czech prisoners began to be allowed to join it, and finally,
under the direction of the Czecho-Slovak National Council, it was formed into a
regular army. In September, 1917, it had already two divisions, and in 1918
fresh prisoners joined it, so that it counted some 100,000.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In order to be able fully to appreciate this achievement, we
must remember that this was an army of volunteers, organised by the Czecho-Slovak
Council without the powers of a real government. At the beginning of the war
the Czecho-Slovaks not only had no government of their own, but not even any
united organisation. And if we realise that to-day, after three and a half
years of strenuous effort, the National Council are recognised by the Allies as
the Provisional Government of Bohemia with the right of exercising all powers
appertaining to a real government, including the control of an army as large as
Great Britain had at the outbreak of the war, it must be admitted that the
action of the Czecho-Slovaks abroad was crowned with wonderful success.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In Russia the difficulties with which the National Council
had to cope were especially grave, and mainly for two reasons. In the first
place, the Czecho-Slovak prisoners who voluntarily surrendered were scattered
all over Russia. It was extremely difficult even to get into touch with them.
In addition there was a lack of good-will on the part of the old Russian
Government. Thus very often these prisoners, who regarded Russia as Bohemia's
elder brother and liberator, were sadly disillusioned when they were left under
the supervision of some German officers, and thousands of them died from
starvation. Nevertheless they never despaired. Eager to fight for the Allies,
many of them entered the Yugoslav Division which fought so gallantly in the
Dobrudja. Nearly all the Czech officers in this division were decorated with
the highest Russian, Serbian and Rumanian orders. Half of them committed
suicide, however, during the retreat rather than fall into the hands of the
enemy.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>It was not until after the Russian Revolution, and
especially after the arrival of Professor Masaryk in Russia in May, 1917, that
the Czecho-Slovak army in Russia became a reality.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czecho-Slovaks have been mentioned in Russian official <i>communiqués</i>
of February 2, 1916, and March 29, 1917. The most glorious part was taken by
the Czecho-Slovak Brigade during the last Russian offensive in July, 1917, in
which the Czechs showed manifestly the indomitable spirit that animates them.
Since every Czech fighting on the side of the Entente is shot, if he is
captured by the Austrians, the Czechs everywhere fight to the bitter end, and
rather commit suicide than be captured by their enemies. For this reason they
are justly feared by the Germans. As in the Hussite wars, the sight of their
caps and the sound of their songs struck terror in the hearts of the Germans
and Magyars. At the battle of Zborov on July 2, 1917, the Czechs gave the whole
world proof of their bravery. Determined to win or fall, they launched an
attack almost without ammunition, with bayonets and hand-grenades--and they
gained a victory over an enemy vastly superior in numbers.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>According to the official Russian <i>communiqué</i>:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"On July 2, at about three o'clock in the afternoon,
after a severe and stubborn battle, the gallant troops of the Czecho-Slovak
Brigade occupied the strongly fortified enemy position on the heights to the
west and south-west of the village of Zborov and the fortified village of Koroszylow.
Three lines of enemy trenches were penetrated. The enemy has retired across the
Little Strypa. The Czecho-Slovak Brigade captured sixty-two officers and 3150
soldiers, fifteen guns and many machine guns. Many of the captured guns were
turned against the enemy."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Finally, however, when the Russians refused to fight, the
Czechs had to retire as well. General Brussiloff declared:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Czecho-Slovaks, perfidiously abandoned at
Tarnopol by our infantry, fought in such a way that the world ought to fall on
its knees before them."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>2. The spontaneous and unanimous political action of the
Czecho-Slovaks abroad became co-ordinated when Professor Masaryk escaped from Austria
and placed himself at the head of the movement.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>Professor Masaryk</i>, the distinguished Czech leader and
scholar, whose name we have already mentioned in the preceding chapters, went
to Italy in December, 1914, and although he desired once more to return to Austria
before leaving finally for France, he found it too dangerous, as the reign of
terror had already been established in Bohemia. He accordingly went to Switzerland
and afterwards on to France and England. In October, 1915, he was appointed
lecturer at the newly founded School of Slavonic Studies at King's College, University
of London. Mr. Asquith, then Prime Minister, who was prevented through
indisposition from presiding at Professor Masaryk's inaugural lecture on October 19, 1915, sent the following message to the meeting:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"I congratulate King's College on Professor Masaryk's
appointment, and I can assure him that we welcome his advent to London both as
a teacher--the influence of whose power and learning is felt throughout the
Slav world--and as a man to whose personal qualities of candour, courage and
strength we are all glad to pay a tribute. We believe that his presence here
will be a link to strengthen the sympathy which unites the people of Russia and
Great Britain."</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"First and foremost the Allies are fighting for the
liberties of small nations, to the end that they may be left in future free
from the tyranny of their more powerful neighbours to develop their own
national life and institutions. Above all, to-day our thoughts and our
sympathies are moved towards Serbia, whose undaunted courage wins day by day our
unbounded sympathy and admiration."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>During the lecture on the Problem of Small Nations in the
European Crisis, Professor Masaryk outlined his political programme which he
has ever since insisted the Allies should adopt, to destroy the German plans of
Mitteleuropa. He declared:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Great Britain came into this war to protect little Belgium,
and now with her Allies she is faced by the task of protecting Serbia. This
evolution of the war is almost logical, for Germany's aim is and was Berlin--Bagdad,
the employment of the nations of Austria-Hungary as helpless instruments, and
the subjection of the smaller nations which form that peculiar zone between the
west and east of Europe. <i>Poland, Bohemia, Serbo-Croatia (the South Slavs)
are the natural adversaries of Germany</i>, of her <i>Drang nach Osten</i>; to
liberate and strengthen these smaller nations is the only real check upon
Prussia. Free Poland, Bohemia and Serbo-Croatia would be so-called buffer states,
their organisation would facilitate and promote the formation of a Magyar
state, of Greater Rumania, of Bulgaria, Greece and the rest of the smaller
nations. If this horrible war, with its countless victims, has any meaning, it
can only be found in the liberation of the small nations who are menaced by Germany's
eagerness for conquest and her thirst for the dominion of Asia. The Oriental
question is to be solved on the Rhine, Moldau and Vistula, not only on the Danube,
Vardar and Maritza."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Soon afterwards Professor Masaryk issued a proclamation
signed by representatives of all Czecho-Slovaks abroad, the full text of which
reads as follows:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We come before the political public at a moment when
the retreat of the victorious Russian army is exploited against Russia and her
Allies. We take the side of the struggling Slav nations and their Allies
without regard to which party will be victorious, simply because the Allies'
cause is just. The decision as to which party in this fatal struggle is
defending the right, is a question of principle and political morality which
to-day cannot be evaded by any honest and clear-thinking politician nor by any
self-conscious nation. But we are prompted to step forward also by our vivid
sense of Slav solidarity: we express our ardent sympathies to our brother Serbs
and Russians, as well as to our brother Poles, so heavily struck by the war. We
believe in the ultimate victory of the Slavs and their Allies, and we are
convinced that this victory will contribute towards the welfare of the whole of
Europe and humanity. The spiteful anti-Slav attitude of Ferdinand the Koburg
and his government cannot retard the victory of a just cause.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Czech nation made an alliance with Hungary and
the Austrian Germans by a free election of a Habsburg to the throne of the kingdom
of Bohemia in 1526; but the dynasty created through a systematic
centralisation and germanisation a unitary absolutist state, thus violating
their treaty guaranteeing the independence of the Bohemian State within and
without. The Czech nation, exhausted by the European and Habsburg anti-reformation,
has only since the Czech regeneration at the end of the eighteenth century been
able to resist this violence. It was especially the revolution of 1848 which
challenged it.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The revolution was crushed, and the secured rights of
nations, especially of the Czechs, were again sacrificed to absolutism which,
however, was shattered by the war of 1859, and replaced by an incomplete
constitutionalism. Then Vienna gave way to the Magyars. But the Czechs had to
content themselves with solemn promises that were never kept. The Czech nation
started a struggle of passive opposition. Later on it also took an active part
in the new parliament, but whether in parliament or in the diets, it always
claimed its historic right of independence and struggled against the
German-Magyar dualism. The attempts made to come to an understanding were
frustrated by the obstinate spirit of domination of the Germans and Magyars.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The present war has only accentuated the
Czecho-Slovak opposition to Austria-Hungary. War was declared without the
parliament being consulted: all other states presented the declaration of war
to their parliaments for ratification, only the Viennese Government was afraid
to consult its peoples, because the majority of them would have declared
against the war. The representatives of the Czech nation would have certainly
protested with the greatest emphasis. That is why the government did not
consult a single Czech deputy or politician with regard to taking so momentous
a step.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Czech nation has always in modern times defended
a thoroughly Slav programme. Also during this war, which has found our nation
unprepared like all other peaceful nations, the Czechs have since the very
beginning expressed their sympathies for Russia, Serbia and their Allies, notwithstanding
the unprecedented Austrian terrorism, suppressing every manifestation of the
real feelings of the people. The pro-Austrian declarations are enforced by the
government. To-day the leading Czech politicians are in prison, the gallows
have become the favourite support of the incapable administration, and Czech
regiments have been decimated for acting spontaneously up to our national Czech
programme. The rights of the Czech language have been ruthlessly violated
during the war, and the absolutist military rule has reigned throughout Bohemia
and other non-German and non-Magyar parts of the monarchy as in enemy
countries. Every declaration in the Czech journals is suppressed, while our
national adversaries are not only allowed to make propaganda against the Czech
nation, but even the pan-German orgies in the spirit of Lagarde, von Hartmann,
Mommsen, and Treitschke are supported by Vienna and Budapest.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Under these circumstances the Czech nation cannot
continue to keep silence. That is why the Czech and Slovak emigrants abroad
deem it their duty to inform foreign opinion about the true situation of Bohemia,
to interpret the aspirations of the Czecho-Slovak nation to the Allied
statesmen, politicians and journalists, and to defend the Czecho-Slovak
programme.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Czech parties have hitherto striven for the
independence of their nation inside Austria-Hungary. <i>The course which this
fratricidal war has taken and the ruthless violence of </i><i>Vienna</i><i>
make it necessary for all of us to strive for independence without regard to </i><i>Austria-Hungary</i><i>.
We are struggling for an absolutely independent Czecho-Slovak State</i>.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Czech nation has come to the conclusion that it
must take its destiny into its own hands. Austria was defeated not only by Russia,
but also by the small and despised Serbia, and became a dependency of Germany.
To-day it has recovered a little under the direction of Berlin, but that
desperate strain of forces does not deceive us: it is only a proof of the
abdication of Austria-Hungary. We have lost all confidence in the vitality of Austria-Hungary,
and we no more recognise its right to existence. Through its incapability and
dependence it has proved to the whole world that the assumption of the
necessity of Austria has passed, and has through this war been proved to be
wrong. Those who have defended the possibility and necessity of
Austria-Hungary--and at one time it was Palacký himself--demanded a
confederated state of equal nations and lands. But the dualist Austria-Hungary
became the oppressor of non-German and non-Magyar nationalities. It is the
obstacle to peace in Europe and it has degenerated into a mere tool for Germany's
expansion to the East, without a positive mission of its own, unable to create
a state organisation of equal nations, free and progressive in civilisation.
The dynasty, living in its absolutist traditions, maintains itself a phantom of
its former world empire, assisted in government by its undemocratic partners,
the barren aristocracy, the anti-national bureaucracy, and the anti-national
military staff.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"To-day there is no doubt that Austria-Hungary wrongly
used the assassination at Sarajevo as a pretext against Serbia. Vienna and Budapest
did not hesitate to use forged documents manufactured by their own embassy
against the Yugoslavs, and in this policy of deceit Vienna and Budapest have
persisted during this war. To this deceit they have now added revengeful
spitefulness and cruelty truly barbarian against the non-Germans and
non-Magyars.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Germany shares the guilt with Austria-Hungary; it was
in Germany's power and it was her duty towards civilisation and humanity to
prevent the war and not to take advantage of the imperialist lust of Vienna and
Budapest.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Austria-Hungary and Germany are fighting with their
Turkish and Bulgarian Allies for a cause which is unjust and doomed."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Later on, when <i>Dr. Edward Beneš</i>, lecturer at the
Czech University of Prague and author of several well-known studies in
sociology, also escaped abroad, the Czecho-Slovak National Council was formed,
of which Professor Masaryk became the president, <i>Dr. Štefanik</i>, a
distinguished airman and scientist, Hungarian Slovak by birth, the
vice-president, and Dr. E. Beneš the general secretary. A French review
was started in Paris (<i>La Nation Tchèque</i>) in May, 1915, which became the
official organ of the Czecho-Slovak movement. Up to May, 1917, it was published
under the editorship of Professor Denis, and since then its editor has been Dr.
Beneš. A Central Czech organ is also published in Paris called <i>Samostatnost</i>
("Independence"), edited by Dr. Sychrava, an eminent Czech
journalist.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The undisputed authority enjoyed by Professor Masaryk among
all the Czecho-Slovaks is undoubtedly the secret of the great strength and
unity of the movement. It is also the reason for the great diplomatic successes
achieved by the Czechs. The chief lieutenants of Professor Masaryk were Dr.
Beneš, an untiring worker with rare political instinct and perspicacity,
and Dr. Milan Štefanik, who entered the French army as a private at the
beginning of the war, was gradually promoted, and in May, 1918, rose to the
rank of brigadier-general. He rendered valuable service to France as an
astronomist before the war, and as an airman during the war. He has rendered
still greater service to the Czecho-Slovak cause as a diplomat. These three
men, unanimously recognised by the two million Czecho-Slovaks in the Allied
countries as their leaders, were finally, in the summer of 1918, recognised
also by the Allies as the <i>de facto</i> provisional government of the Czecho-Slovak
State, with all rights and powers of a real government. The central seat of
the Czecho-Slovak Government is in Paris, and official Czecho-Slovak
representatives and legations are in all the Allied capitals.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>3. The first political success of the National Council was
the Allies' Note to President Wilson of January 10, 1917. The Czechs are
especially grateful to France for this first recognition of their claims.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In this Note, in which the Allies for the first time stated
publicly and explicitly their war aims, the Allies declared that these include:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The reorganisation of Europe guaranteed by a stable
settlement, based upon the principle of nationality, upon the right which all
peoples, whether small or great, have to the enjoyment of full security and
free economic development, and also upon territorial agreements and
international arrangements so framed as to guarantee land and sea frontiers
against unjust attacks; the restitution of provinces or territories formerly
torn from the Allies by force or contrary to the wishes of their inhabitants; <i>the
liberation of Italians, Slavs, Rumanians and Czecho-Slovaks from foreign
domination</i>; the liberation of the peoples who now lie beneath the murderous
tyranny of the Turks, and the expulsion from Europe of the Ottoman Empire,
which has proved itself so radically alien to Western civilisation."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The greatest success of the Czecho-Slovak National Council,
however, has been the formal recognition by France of the formation of an
autonomous Czecho-Slovak army in France with the National Council at its head.
By this act France recognised:</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>(1) That the Czecho-Slovaks have a right to form an army of
their own, which right appertains only to a sovereign and independent nation;</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>(2) That the Czecho-Slovaks have a right to fight on the side
of the Entente, and therefore are to be considered as one of the Allies;</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>(3) That the political direction of the army is reserved to
the Czecho-Slovak National Council, which right is usually accorded only to the
government of an independent state.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The full text of this historic document, signed by the
President of the French Republic, M. Poincaré, the French Premier, M.
Clémenceau, and the Foreign Secretary, M. Pichon, and dated December 19, 1917, reads as follows:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"1. The Czecho-Slovaks organised in an autonomous army
and recognising, from the military point of view, the superior authority of the
French high command, will fight under their own flag against the Central
Powers.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"2. This national army is placed, from the political
point of view, under the direction of the Czecho-Slovak National Council whose
headquarters are in Paris.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"3. The formation of the Czecho-Slovak army as well as
its further work are assured by the French Government.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"4. The Czecho-Slovak army will be subject to the same
dispositions as regards organisation, hierarchy, administration and military
discipline as those in force in the French army.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"5. The Czecho-Slovak army will be recruited from
among:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>(<i>a</i>) Czecho-Slovaks at present serving with the
French army;</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>(<i>b</i>) Czecho-Slovaks from other countries admitted to
be transferred into the Czecho-Slovak army or to contract a voluntary
engagement with this army for the duration of war.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"6. Further ministerial instructions will settle the
application of this decree.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"7. The President of the War Cabinet, the Secretary of
War, and the Foreign Secretary are charged each in his own sphere to bring into
effect the present decree, which will be published in the <i>Bulletin des Lois</i>
and inserted in the <i>Journal Officiel de la République Française</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In a covering letter, dated December 16, 1917, and addressed to M. Poincaré, the French Premier and the Foreign Secretary declared:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"France has always supported by all means in her power
the national aspirations of the Czecho-Slovaks. The number of volunteers of
this nationality who at the outbreak of the war enlisted to fight under the
French flag was considerable; the gaps created in their ranks prove
unquestionably the ardour with which they fought against our enemies.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Certain Allied governments, especially the Russian
Provisional Government, did not hesitate to authorise the formation on our
front of units composed of Czecho-Slovaks who had escaped from the oppression
of their enemy.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"It is only just that this nationality should be given
means of defending, under their own flag and side by side with us, the cause of
right and liberty of peoples, and it will be in accord with French traditions
to assist the organisation of an autonomous Czecho-Slovak army."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Needless to say, the joy over this recognition was very
great in Bohemia, while the German papers were furious. The <i>Neue Freie
Presse</i> of December 28 devoted its leading article to the Czecho-Slovak army
on the Western front, and concluded with the following remarks:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Although the strength of this new army is estimated
at 120,000 men, the Czecho-Slovak army will not have a decisive influence on
the military operations. Nevertheless, it may do us considerable harm in case
we should transfer troops to the Western front. However, the greatest harm is
in the moral effect which this act of wholesale treachery of the Czechs will
have on the military power of the monarchy. In any case the co-operation of the
Czecho-Slovak army on the side of the Entente will only strengthen the Allies'
belief that right is on their side."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Soon afterwards Italy also generously allowed an
expeditionary corps of the Czecho-Slovak army to be formed from the
Czecho-Slovak prisoners of war who surrendered to her. On May 23, 1918, the Czecho-Slovak troops welcomed the Prince of Wales to Rome, and soon afterwards they
distinguished themselves on the Piave and were mentioned in one of General
Diaz's dispatches and also in the official Italian <i>communiqué</i> of September 22, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>From the recognition of the Czecho-Slovak army followed the
full recognition which the National Council obtained from the Allies.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>4. While the general secretariat was actively working for
these concessions in the West, Professor Masaryk, after devoting his attention
to the education of public opinion in Great Britain on the importance of Bohemia,
by means of private memoranda and various articles in the <i>New </i><i>Europe</i><i>,
Weekly Dispatch</i> and elsewhere, decided in May, 1917, to go to Russia.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In Russia, Professor Masaryk succeeded admirably in uniting
and strengthening all Czecho-Slovak forces, and in organising a regular army of
the many thousands of Czecho-Slovak prisoners there. As we have already pointed
out elsewhere, before the Revolution these efforts of the National Council and
the Czech prisoners, who were always eager to fight for the Allies, were
rendered immensely difficult by the obstacles inherent in the geographic
conditions of Russia and by obstacles placed in their way by the old Russian
régime.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Unfortunately now, when the Czecho-Slovaks had at last
succeeded after much work in realising their plans, the Czecho-Slovak army
became powerless owing to the collapse of Russia. Without ammunition, without
support from anywhere, the Czecho-Slovaks thought they could no more render
very effective service to the Allies in the East. They decided, therefore, to
go over to join their compatriots in France.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The position of our army was as follows: After the offensive
of July, 1917, the Czechs retreated to Kieff where they continued to
concentrate fresh forces. At that time they numbered about 60,000, and this
number had gradually increased to 80,000 by the end of 1917. They always
observed strict neutrality in Russia's internal affairs on the advice of their
venerable leader, Professor Masaryk. It was necessary to counsel this neutrality
for the sake of our army itself, since it contained partisans of different
creeds and parties disagreement among whom might have led to its dissolution.
On the whole, the Czecho-Slovaks, who are an advanced nation, fully conscious
of their national aspirations, remained unaffected by the misleading Bolshevist
theories. The Czechs abstained throughout from interfering with Russian
affairs, yet they did not wish to leave Russia as long as there was any chance
for them to assist her. It was not until the shameful peace of Brest-Litovsk in
February, 1918, that Professor Masaryk decided that the Czecho-Slovak army
should leave Russia <i>via</i> Siberia and join the Czecho-Slovak army in France.
The Bolsheviks granted them free passage to Vladivostok.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>This journey of some 5000 miles was not, however, an easy
task for an army to accomplish. The troops had to move in small échelons or
detachments, and concentration at the stations was prohibited. They had to
procure their trains and their provisions, and they had constant trouble with
the Bolsheviks, because in every district there was a practically independent
Soviet Government with whom the Czechs had to negotiate. The first detachments
with the generalissimo of the army, General Diderichs, at the head arrived in Vladivostok
at the end of April, 1918. But the other detachments were constantly held up by
the Bolsheviks and had great trouble in passing through.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>They moved from Kieff <i>via</i> Kursk, Tambov, Penza and
Samara. The two last-named towns lie on the line between Moscow and
Tcheliabinsk at the foot of the Urals, whence a direct line runs across Siberia
to Vladivostok.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>As we have already pointed out, the Bolsheviks agreed in
principle to allow our troops to leave Russia. Their commander-in-chief,
General Muraviev, allowed the Czechs free passage to France on February 16. The
same concession had been granted by the Moscow Soviet. On the whole the Czechs
were on tolerably good terms with the Bolsheviks. Professor Masaryk rejected
every plan directed against the Bolsheviks submitted to him even by such of
their political adversaries as could not justly be called
counter-revolutionaries. The Czecho-Slovak troops went still further; they
actually complied with the request of the Bolsheviks and partially disarmed.
The trouble only began in May, 1918, when the Bolsheviks yielded to German
intrigues and resolved to destroy our army.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Already at the beginning of May the Czechs had begun to feel
embittered against the Bolsheviks, because in defiance of the agreement their
troops were constantly being held up by local Soviets. At Tambov, for instance,
they were held up for a whole month. At Tcheliabinsk the Czechs had a serious
scuffle with Magyar ex-prisoners on May 26, and the Bolsheviks sided entirely
with the Magyars, even arresting some Czecho-Slovak delegates. The Czechs
simply occupied the city, liberated their comrades, and at a congress held by
them at Tcheliabinsk on May 28 it was decided to refuse to surrender any more
arms and ammunition and to continue transports to Vladivostok, if necessary
with arms in their hands. This was a reply to Trotsky's telegram that the
Czecho-Slovaks should be completely disarmed, which the Czecho-Slovaks defied
as they knew that another order had been issued by Trotsky simultaneously, no
doubt on the instigation of Count Mirbach, saying that the Czecho-Slovak troops
must be dissolved at all costs and interned as prisoners of war. The Bolsheviks
now arrested prominent members of the Moscow branch of the Czecho-Slovak
National Council on the ground that they were "anti-revolutionaries."
They alleged also that they had no guarantee that ships would be provided for
the Czechs to be transported to France, and that the Czechs were holding up
food supplies from Siberia. The Bolsheviks deliberately broke their word, and
Trotsky issued an order to "all troops fighting against the
anti-revolutionary Czecho-Slovak brigades" in which he said:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The concentration of our troops is complete. Our army
being aware that the Czecho-Slovaks are direct allies of the anti-revolution
and of the capitalists, fights them well. The Czecho-Slovaks are retreating
along the railway. Obviously they would like to enter into negotiations with
the Soviets. We issued an order that their delegates should be received. We
demand in the first place that they should be disarmed. <i>Those who do not do
so voluntarily will be shot on the spot.</i> Warlike operations on the railway
line hinder food transports. Energetic steps must be taken to do away with this
state of affairs."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czecho-Slovaks were greatly handicapped, since they were
not only almost unarmed, but were also dispersed along the trans-Siberian line
in small detachments which had considerable difficulty in keeping in touch with
each other. Nevertheless the fates were favourable to them. They were
victorious almost everywhere, thanks to their wonderful spirit and discipline.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The first victories gained by the Czecho-Slovaks over the
Bolsheviks were at Penza and Samara. Penza was captured by them after three
days' fighting at the end of May. Later the Czecho-Slovaks also took Sysran on
the Volga, Kazan with its large arsenal, Simbirsk and Yekaterinburg, connecting
Tcheliabinsk with Petrograd, and occupied practically the whole Volga region.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In Siberia they defeated a considerable force of
German-Magyar ex-prisoners in Krasnoyarsk and Omsk and established themselves
firmly in Udinsk. On June 29, 15,000 Czecho-Slovaks under General Diderichs,
after handing an ultimatum to the Bolsheviks at Vladivostok, occupied the city
without much resistance. Only at one spot fighting took place and some 160
Bolsheviks were killed. The Czecho-Slovaks, assisted by Japanese and Allied
troops, then proceeded to the north and north-west, while the Bolsheviks and
German prisoners retreated to Chabarovsk. In September the Czech and Allied
troops from Vladivostok joined hands with the Czecho-Slovaks from Irkutsk and Western
Siberia, and thus gained control over practically the whole trans-Siberian
railway. By this means they have done great service to the Allies, especially
to Great Britain, by defending the East against the German invaders.
Furthermore, it was the Czecho-Slovaks' bold action which induced Japan and
America at last to intervene in Russia and for the sake of Russia, and it was
their control of the Siberian railway which made such intervention possible.
Let us hope that their action will lead to the regeneration and salvation of
the Russian nation.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The service rendered by Czecho-Slovak troops to the Allied
cause was, of course, justly appreciated by the Allies. Mr. Lloyd George sent
the following telegram to Professor Masaryk on September 9:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"On behalf of the British War Cabinet I send you our
heartiest congratulations on the striking successes won by the Czecho-Slovak
forces against the armies of German and Austrian troops in Siberia. The story
of the adventures and triumphs of this small army is, indeed, one of the
greatest epics of history. It has filled us all with admiration for the
courage, persistence and self-control of your countrymen, and shows what can be
done to triumph over time, distance and lack of material resources by those
holding the spirit of freedom in their hearts. Your nation has rendered
inestimable service to Russia and to the Allies in their struggle to free the
world from despotism. We shall never forget it."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The deeds of our army met with equal admiration and
gratitude also in Bohemia. This is clearly shown by the speech of the Czech
deputy Stříbrný, delivered in the Austrian Reichsrat on July 17, and
entirely suppressed in the Austrian and German press. Despite the vigilance on
the part of the Austrian authorities, however, we have been able to secure the
full text of this remarkable speech which reads as follows:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"GENTLEMEN,--Let me first of all emphasise that my
speech is not a defence of the Czech nation and of the Czech soldiers. There
are no judges in this parliament competent to judge us.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"You call us traitors. We accept your declaration as
the view of our enemy. Nothing more--nothing less.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"You gentlemen on the German benches, you dared,
however, to touch the honour of our soldiers--you called them cowards. And in
this respect we are not going to keep silent. We shall always protest against
such injustice! We shall never permit these heroes to be abused by being called
'cowards.' If there is a single gentleman among you he ought for a moment to
reflect on the soul of a Czech soldier--a soldier who has been compelled by
force to fight in a war which the German Imperial Chancellor has openly called
'a war of Germans against the Slavs'; a soldier who was compelled under the
threat of immediate execution to take up arms against the interests of the
Slavs, against the interests of his brothers, against the interests of his own
country--Bohemia. Well then, was it cowardice on the part of this soldier when he,
exposed to the fire of Austrian and German guns and machine guns from behind,
went over to the other side? Was he a coward when, while free to remain in his
captivity as a prisoner of war safely waiting until the end of the war, he
volunteered to fight again and was ready to risk his life and health once more?
Is that Czech soldier a coward who went once more into the trenches, although
aware that if he were captured he would not be treated as an ordinary prisoner
of war but as a deserter, and hanged accordingly? Is that man a coward who
sacrifices his family which he has left behind and his soil and property
inherited from his ancestors? Is that man a coward who sacrifices himself, his
father and mother, his wife and children for the sake of his nation and country?</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Is that Czech soldier not a hero who to-day is
voluntarily fighting from the Ural Mountains to Vladivostok, on the Piave and
in France?</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"If there is a single gentleman, a real gentleman
among you, let him stand up and answer these questions.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"And if there is not such a gentleman among you,
remember the words of our bitter enemy the late Minister for Home Defence,
Baron Georgi, who related to this House in a secret sitting all that our
regiments have accomplished. He could not as a soldier suppress a sigh and say,
'We regret all those treacheries of Czech soldiers, still more because from
their deeds committed on the side of our enemy we can realise what a splendid
military material we have lost.' And if this is not sufficient, I will remind
you of the opinion of those who are in your eyes the best judges--the Prussian
officers. In an Austrian officers' canteen where Czech soldiers had been abused
the whole evening by being called cowards, the Prussian officers present were
asked to give their opinion on this point. They answered, 'We shall only be
able to judge as to whether the Czechs are cowards or not when they begin to
fight against us.'</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"You should at least be gentlemanly enough not to
slander your enemies who have proved themselves to be greater heroes than any
other soldiers, because they are voluntary heroes, whereas the others are
heroes under compulsion!</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"This question of cowardice is therefore, I hope,
settled forever.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"And now with regard to the title of 'traitors.' <i>We
are traitors to </i><i>Austria</i><i>--every one of us admits it honestly</i>.
Not one of you, however, has the right to reproach us for this. All of you are
patriots by order, and it cannot be otherwise in a dynastic state like Austria.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"With regard to the patriotism of the Magyars, we have
proofs of this dating from 1866. They have done the same as we are doing
to-day. They surrendered and organised Klapka's legions against Austria. The
fact that they were punished for their treachery by being given their own
independence does not speak against us.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Yes, gentlemen, we are traitors as much as you
Magyars, or as you Germans were, or would be under similar circumstances. And <i>we
want the same as you want</i>, i.e. <i>to be free citizens of our own state</i>.
Our own state--that does not mean to have a few officials or one more
university. To have a state of our own--that means to be able to decide freely
if our soldiers shall go to war again, and if they do, to see that they go only
for the interests of their own nation, and not for the interests of their enemies.
An independent state--that means for us no longer to die by order of
foreigners, and no longer to live under foreign domination.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Let me remind the gentlemen on the German benches of
a lesson in history. Up till 1866 Germany was nominally under the sceptre of
the Habsburg dynasty--a German dynasty, mind you. Prussia and Northern Germany
felt the indignity of the 'foreign' rule of the Habsburgs--and they started the
fratricidal war in 1866 in order to get rid of this rule....</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"It is for you gentlemen on the German benches to
speak! Let him who regrets the blood then spilt stand up and speak. Let him
stand up and condemn Bismarck and William I. who started the war in order to
deliver Germany from the same yoke from which we are trying to free ourselves
to-day. If there is a single man among the Germans who would be prepared to say
that the war against Austria should never have happened, let him stand up. That
war was carried on to free Germany from the incapable rule of Vienna and it had
the same aim in view which you reproach us with to-day and call high treason!</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"You are silent, gentlemen! We are satisfied with your
silence. And now go and continue to stone and abuse us."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>5. In the meantime, Professor Masaryk arrived in the United
States <i>via</i> Japan in May, 1918. He was accorded a splendid reception at
Chicago where some 200,000 Czecho-Slovaks, as well as various Allied
representatives, greeted him. His presence in the United States not only
stimulated recruiting among Czecho-Slovaks there, but had also political
results, especially when the Central Powers launched their peace offensive.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>At the end of May, Mr. Lansing issued the following
statement:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Secretary of State desires to announce that the
proceedings of the Congress of Oppressed Nationalities of Austria-Hungary which
was held in Rome in April have been followed with great interest by the
Government of the United States, and that the nationalist aspirations of the
Czecho-Slovaks and Jugoslavs have the earnest sympathy of this
government."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>This declaration was endorsed by the representatives of Great
Britain, France and Italy at Versailles on June 3, 1918. On June 29, Mr. Lansing completed and explained his statement as follows:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Since the issuance by this government on May 29 of a
statement regarding the nationalist aspirations for freedom of the
Czecho-Slovaks and Jugoslavs, German and Austrian officials have sought to
misinterpret and distort its manifest interpretation. In order, therefore, that
there may be no misunderstanding concerning the meaning of this statement, the
Secretary of State to-day further announces the position of the United States
Government to be that <i>all branches of the Slav race should be completely
freed from German and Austrian rule</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On the following day, that is on June 30, 1918, President Poincaré presented the Czecho-Slovak army with a flag and delivered an
inspiring speech to them.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On the occasion of the handing of this flag by President
Pioncaré to the Czecho-Slovak army, M. Pichon, the Minister for Foreign
Affairs, on behalf of the government of the French Republic, addressed the
following letter to Dr. Edouard Beneš, the general secretary of the
Czecho-Slovak National Council in Paris:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"At the moment when the 21st Regiment of Chasseurs,
the first unit of the autonomous Czecho-Slovak army in France, after receiving
its flag, is leaving its quarters to take up its position in a sector amongst
its French brothers-in-arms, the Republican Government, in recognition of your
efforts and your attachment to the Allied cause, considers it just and
necessary to proclaim <i>the right of your nation to its independence and to
recognise publicly and officially the National Council as the supreme organ of
its general interests and the first step towards a future Czecho-Slovak
Government</i>.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"During many centuries the Czecho-Slovak nation has
enjoyed the incomparable benefit of independence. It has been deprived of this
independence through the violence of the Habsburgs allied to the German
princes. The historic rights of nations are imperishable. It is for the defence
of these rights that France, attacked, is fighting to-day together with her
Allies. The cause of the Czechs is especially dear to her.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"France will never forget the Prague manifestation of December 8, 1870. Neither will she forget the resistance of its population and the refusal
of Czech soldiers to fight for Austria-Hungary, for which heroism thousands of
these patriots paid with their lives. France has also heard the appeals of the
Czech deputies of January 6, April 13, and May 16, 1918.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Faithful to the principles of respect for
nationalities and the liberation of oppressed nations, <i>the Government of the
Republic considers the claims of the Czecho-Slovak nation as just and well
founded, and will, at the right moment, support with all its solicitude the
realisation of your aspirations to independence within the historic boundaries
of your territories</i> at present suffering under the oppressive yoke of
Austria and Hungary.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"It is very pleasant for me, Monsieur le Secrétaire
Général, to make this declaration. Your sentiments, reflecting those of your
compatriots, are for me the measure of the high degree of the future happiness
of your country.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"In the name of the Government of the French Republic
I tender <i>my warmest and most sincere wishes that the Czecho-Slovak State may
speedily become, through the common efforts of all the Allies and in close
union with Poland and the Jugoslav State, an insurmountable barrier to Teutonic
aggression</i> and a factor for peace in a reconstituted Europe in accordance
with the principles of justice and rights of nationalities."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>It is unnecessary to add long comments to this clear and
explicit state paper which forms a veritable pledge on the part of France to
secure Czecho-Slovak independence. It is a recognition of Bohemia's right to
independence and of the National Council as the supreme organ of the
Czecho-Slovak nation abroad. At the same time it is also an acceptance of our
programme of the reorganisation of Central Europe, necessitating the break-up
of Austria, and in this respect it is also a success and a pledge for the Poles
and Yugoslavs.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>6. If France and Italy showed such deep understanding of the
cause of Bohemia's liberty, exhibited in practice by special military
conventions concluded with our National Council, Great Britain may be proud of
no less generosity. Although having no direct interests in seeing Bohemia
independent, Great Britain, true to her traditions as a champion of the
liberties of small nations, did not hesitate to give us a declaration which not
only fully endorses all pledges of France and Italy, but which goes still
further and practically recognises our full national sovereignty.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On August 9, 1918, His Majesty's Government issued the
following declaration:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Since the beginning of the war the Czecho-Slovak
nation has resisted the common enemy by every means in its power. The
Czecho-Slovaks have constituted a considerable army, fighting on three
different battlefields and attempting, in Russia and Siberia, to arrest the
Germanic invasion.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>In consideration of their efforts to achieve
independence, Great Britain regards the Czecho-Slovaks as an Allied nation and
recognises the unity of the three Czecho-Slovak armies as an Allied and
belligerent army waging a regular warfare against Austria-Hungary and Germany</i>.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Great Britain also recognises <i>the right of the
Czecho-Slovak National Council as the supreme organ of the Czecho-Slovak
national interests, and as the present trustee of the future Czecho-Slovak
Government to exercise supreme authority over this Allied and belligerent army</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>It will be readily seen of what a tremendous significance
this declaration is from an international point of view. Apart from the fact
that it recognises our efforts towards independence, the declaration says explicitly
that the Czecho-Slovaks, abroad and at home, are an Allied nation, which
implies that the Allies will treat them henceforward as such, and will allow
their government to establish consular service and to send representatives to
Allied conferences. The sovereignty both of the Czecho-Slovak army and of the
National Council is fully recognised in this declaration which proclaims
"the unity of the three Czecho-Slovak armies (in Russia, France and Italy)
as an <i>Allied and belligerent army</i> waging <i>regular warfare</i> against Austria."
Only a sovereign army is a belligerent army waging regular warfare. Thus the
Czecho-Slovaks, according to international law, are no more rebels but regular
soldiers whom, when captured, Austria has no more the right to execute. Similarly
also the recognition of the National Council as the "trustee" of the
Czecho-Slovak Government is clear and explicit; in fact a "trustee"
is the word applied to a provisional government of a state. As a matter of
fact, the National Council, on the ground of this recognition of full
sovereignty, was constituted as a Provisional Government on October 14, 1918, and has the power to exercise all rights appertaining to a sovereign and
independent government.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Thus implicitly Great Britain considers Czecho-Slovak
independence already a <i>fait accompli</i>. It speaks of and considers a Czecho-Slovak
State no more as a probability, but as a certainty. As with the Czecho-Slovaks
so with Great Britain, Austria exists no more.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The recognition is of additional importance because it comes
from Great Britain who has always been considered a traditional friend of Austria,
and who is known for conservatism in foreign politics. The decision to issue a
declaration of such far-reaching importance was surely arrived at only after
due and careful deliberation. The step which Great Britain has taken thereby
once more proves the deep sense of justice and the far-sightedness of British
statesmen. Needless to say that the Czecho-Slovaks will always remain grateful
to Great Britain for this bold and generous act. Its immediate effect has been
consternation in Vienna and encouragement both to the Czecho-Slovak soldiers
fighting on the side of the Entente and to the Czech leaders courageously
defending Bohemia's rights in Vienna. As deputy Klofáč put it at a meeting
in Laibach on August 15:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Henceforward the Czechs will refuse to hold any
negotiations with Vienna, with whom any compromise is now out of the question.
The Czecho-Slovaks will firmly continue the struggle for complete national
independence, strengthened by the support of other Slavs, and by the knowledge
that the British and other Allied governments had formally acknowledged and
were working for the establishment of an independent Czecho-Slovak State."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>This chapter would not be complete if we did not quote the
subsequent declarations of the United States of America and Japan, practically
endorsing the British declaration.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On September 3, Mr. Lansing issued the following statement:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Czecho-Slovak peoples having taken up arms
against the German and Austro-Hungarian empires, and having placed in the field
organised armies, which are waging war against those empires under officers of
their own nationality and in accordance with the rules and practices of
civilised nations, and Czecho-Slovaks having in the prosecution of their
independence in the present war confided the supreme political authority to the
Czecho-Slovak National Council, the Government of the United States recognises
that a state of belligerency exists between the Czecho-Slovaks thus organised
and the German and Austro-Hungarian empires.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"It also recognises <i>the Czecho-Slovak National
Council as a</i> de facto <i>belligerent government</i>, clothed with proper
authority to direct the military and political affairs of the Czecho-Slovaks.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Government of the United States further declares
that it is prepared to enter formally into relations with the <i>de facto</i>
government thus recognised for the purpose of prosecuting the war against the
common enemy, the empires of Germany and Austria-Hungary."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>A week later the Japanese Government, through the medium of
its ambassador in London, communicated the following declaration to the
Czecho-Slovak National Council:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Japanese Government have noted with deep and
sympathetic interest the just aspirations of the Czecho-Slovak people for a
free and independent national existence. These aspirations have conspicuously
been made manifest in their determined and well-organised efforts to arrest the
progress of the Germanic aggression.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"In these circumstances, the Japanese Government are
happy to regard the Czecho-Slovak army as an Allied and belligerent army waging
regular warfare against Austria-Hungary and Germany, and to recognise the
rights of the Czecho-Slovak National Council to exercise the supreme control
over that army. They are further prepared to enter into communication with the
duly authorised representatives of the Czecho-Slovak National Council, whenever
necessary, on all matters of mutual interest to the Japanese and the Czecho-Slovak
forces in Siberia."</p>
<p class=Chapter><a name=SpeakAtHome>VII</a></p>
<p class=ChapterDescription>THE CZECHS AT HOME BEGIN TO SPEAK</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The opening of the Reichsrat in May, 1917, was intended to
give Austria the appearance of a "democratic" country in which
diverse nationalities live in peace and happiness. Democratic indeed! A parliament,
subject to censorship, lacking the freedom of speech and all influence on the
government, with 463 members instead of 516, many of whom were still in prison
and in exile! And if there was still any person in the Allied countries having
any doubts concerning the attitude of the Czechs and Yugoslavs, these doubts
were certainly dispelled after the courageous indictment against Austria made
by the Slav deputies, representing practically all the Czech and Yugoslav
political parties. The declaration of the Poles in favour of a united and
independent Poland, the statement of Messrs. Staněk and Korošec in
the name of <i>all</i> Czechs and Yugoslavs in favour of a Czecho-Slovak and
Yugoslav State, the speech of deputy Kalina denying all responsibility of the
Czechs for the war, and expressing Czech sympathies with the Entente Powers, and
the terrible story of persecutions which the Czechs had to suffer from Austria
during the war, told by deputy Stříbrný, formed a veritable "Mene
Tekel," a death sentence pronounced by the Austrian Slavs on their tyrants
in Vienna and Budapest.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The revelation in the Reichsrat of the hopeless state of
decay prevailing in Austria-Hungary was, of course, due to the Russian
Revolution. If it was not for the Russian Revolution, the Austrian Emperor and
Clam-Martinic would perhaps have continued their reign of absolutism by way of
imperial decrees, and they would never have dreamt of convoking the Reichsrat.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>However, the desperate economic and political situation
forced Austria to find some way out of her difficulties, and to plead for peace
as she began to realise that otherwise she was doomed. The change of order and
the situation in Russia and the uncertain attitude of some Allied statesmen
seemed favourable for the Austrian calculations respecting a separate peace.
But Austria could not possibly hope to deceive free Russia or the Allies and
lure them into concluding a premature peace if the reign of terrorism and
absolutism still prevailed in the Dual Monarchy. For this reason Tisza, with
his sinister reputation, was forced to go, and the Reichsrat was convened. Austria
based her plans on the ignorance of some Allied politicians who really believed
in the "new orientation" of the Vienna Government because of the
Bohemian <i>names</i> (not sympathies) of Clam-Martinic and Czernin. In the
same way Austria wanted to make outsiders believe that a change in the name of
the Hungarian Premier meant a change of system, and that the convocation of the
Reichsrat meant a new era of "democracy" in Austria.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Neither of these assumptions was, of course, correct. If the
Magyars talk of introducing universal suffrage, they want to extend it to
Magyar electors, and on one condition only, viz. that all the candidates shall
be of <i>Magyar</i> nationality, or, as the Hungarian Premier, Count Esterhazy,
put it, "democracy in Hungary can only be a Magyar democracy"--that
is, a system utterly at variance with the principles of justice.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>But far from averting the doom of Austria and bringing her
peace and consolation, the opening of the Reichsrat only hastened Austria's
downfall, for it enabled the Austrian Slavs, who now felt that the moment had
come for them to speak, to declare before the whole world their aspirations,
and their determination to destroy the monarchy.</p>
<p class=Section><a name=MayDeclaration><i>(a) The Czech Declaration of </i></a><i>May</i> 30, 1917</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Before entering the Reichsrat, the Czechs made it clear that
they no longer desired any compromise with Austria. In a manifesto signed by
150 Czech authors and subsequently endorsed by professors, teachers and various
societies and corporations, the Czech deputies were reminded that the fate of
their nation was at stake:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The doors of the Austrian Parliament are opening and
the political representatives of the nations have for the first time the
opportunity of speaking and acting freely. Whatever they may say and decide
will be heard not only at home, but also throughout Europe and overseas.... The
programme of our nation is founded on its history and racial unity, on its
modern political life and rights. The present time emphasises the necessity for
carrying out this programme completely.... To-day you are forced to develop
this programme, to defend it to the last breath before the forum of Europe, and
to demand its realisation without limitations.... Democratic Europe, the Europe
of free and independent nations, is the Europe of the future. The nation asks
you to be equal to this historic occasion, to devote to it all your abilities
and to sacrifice to it all other considerations...."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>And to this appeal of their nation the Czech, deputies did
not turn a deaf ear.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On entering the Reichsrat on May 30, 1917, Mr. Staněk, president of the Union of Czech Deputies, made the following memorable
declaration in the name of all the Czech deputies:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"While taking our stand at this historic moment on the
natural right of peoples to self-determination and free development--a right
which in our case is further strengthened by inalienable historic rights fully
recognised by this state--we shall, at the head of our people, work for <i>the
union of all branches of the Czecho-Slovak nation in a single democratic
Bohemian State</i>, comprising also the Slovak branch of our nation which lives
in the lands adjoining our Bohemian Fatherland."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Both the Yugoslav and the Polish press greeted this
declaration with undisguised joy and sympathy.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The <i>Glos Naroda</i> welcomed the Czech declaration, and
added: "Those who to-day are asking for an independent national existence
do not claim anything but the minimum of their rights. Nothing less could
satisfy them (<i>i.e.</i> the Czechs and Yugo-slavs), seeing that even smaller
and less historic nations claim the same." The <i>Nowa Reforma</i> also
said that the Czechs were quite right to ask for full independence. "They
are entitled to it by their position in which they can lose nothing more than
they have lost already, but gain a great deal. Among the Entente Powers there
is nobody who would have an open or disguised interest in opposing even the
boldest claims of the Czecho-Slovak nation."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The declaration of deputy Staněk was completed by a
statement of deputy Kalina who made it quite clear that the Czechs refuse
responsibility for the war, and that their sympathies are with the Entente.
Kalina, a prominent leader of the State Right Party, said:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"As deputies elected by the Czech nation, <i>we
absolutely reject every responsibility for this war</i>.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"After three years, the government has summoned the <i>Reichsrat,
which the Czechs never recognised</i>, and against which, as well as against
the so-called constitution, they again make a formal protest. The great Russian
Revolution forced the government to a plausible restoration of constitutional
life.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>The Czech nation hails with unbounded joy and
enthusiasm the liberation of Eastern Europe</i>. The main principles of that
memorable Revolution are closely related to our own traditions, <i>i.e.</i> to
the principle of <i>liberty, equality and fraternity of all nations</i>. Bohemia
is a free country. Never in her history did she accept laws from aliens, not
even from her powerful neighbours in Europe. Liberty of individuals, liberty of
nations is again our motto which the nation of Hussites is bringing before the
world. In these historic moments, when from the blood-deluged battlefields a
new Europe is arising, and the idea of the sovereignty of nations and
nationalities is triumphantly marching throughout the Continent, <i>the Czech
nation solemnly declares before the world its firm will for liberty and
independence</i> on the ground of the ancient historic rights of the Bohemian
Crown. In demanding independence, the Czech nation asks, in the sense of the
new democracy, for the extension of the right of self-determination to the
whole Czecho-Slovak nation."</p>
<p class=Section><a name=ReichsratSpeeches><i>(b) Courageous Speeches delivered
by Czech Deputies in the Reichsrat</i></a></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>During the subsequent session of the Reichsrat, various
Czech deputies, representing all the Czech parties, made declarations, some of
which we will quote in order to show the remarkable unanimity of the Czechs in
their opposition to Austria and in their demand for independence. <i>It was
chiefly this unanimity of all Czech parties and classes in </i><i>Bohemia</i><i>
and the absolute harmony between their action and the Czecho-Slovak action
abroad which formed the real strength of the movement</i>.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>Dr. Stránský</i>, leader of the Moravian People's Party,
delivered a long speech in the Reichsrat on June 12, 1917, from which we quote the following significant passages:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Germans say that germanisation is not carried out
except where it is in the interests of the state. We do not think that the
interests of the state should go first. If the interests of a state are not
identical with the liberties and interests of a nation, then <i>such a state
has for that nation no right to exist</i>.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"If Clam-Martinic thinks that we will enter the
Reichsrat which the Polish deputies would not attend in their present strength,
then he is greatly mistaken. We heartily wish the Poles to achieve their
national independence, but should we be denied an equal right, then it would
mean an end to this Reichsrat. We want to enjoy the same happiness as the rest,
<i>we want to be free from all oppression, from all foreign domination. We want
to decide for ourselves the form of our political existence</i>. We want to
choose our own laws, we want to govern ourselves. <i>We claim the restitution
of our political independence and of the supreme historic right of the Czech
nation in the lands of the Bohemian Crown. The time is ripe also when the
Austrian fortresses of St. Peter and </i><i>St. Paul</i><i> will open, and when
their prisoners will change places with their persecutors. The state and
dynasty have lately taken away the rights and liberties of our nation and
trampled them underfoot</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On June 15, the National Socialist deputy <i>Stříbrný</i>,
openly demanded the creation of a Czecho-Slovak Republic:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The German annexationist plans are doomed. The Czechs
greet with joy the new era of equality and fraternity, an era in which a <i>democratic
republic</i> is considered as the best form of government. The Czechs demand
the creation of a Bohemia in which they will possess their own independent
government. <i>Too long have they been oppressed by </i><i>Austria</i><i>, and
now they are determined to achieve their national liberty</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On June 26, <i>Dr. Soukup</i>, the leader of the Czecho-Slav
Social Democratic Party, made an equally remarkable statement:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"As a Social Democrat I say that we, the Czecho-Slovak
nation, have also a right to a place in the sun, and we want to be seen. Do you
consider that a nation numbering over ten million and boasting of a highly
developed civilisation can continue to breathe under such oppressive
conditions, seeing what an important role is being played by four million
Bulgars, two million Greeks, two million Danes and other small nations? <i>We
welcome the resurrection of the great and united </i><i>Polish</i><i> </i><i>State</i><i>,
we witness the great Yugoslav nation shaping its boundaries along the </i><i>Adriatic</i><i>,
and we also see Ukrainia arising. At such moments we want to live as well, and
we will live</i>!"</p>
<p class=Section><a name=AfterAmnesty><i>(c) After the Amnesty</i></a></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The political amnesty of July, 1917, intended to appease the
Slavs, had just the opposite effect: it only strengthened the Slav resistance
which acquired fresh strength and impetus by the return of the old leaders.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Kramář was hailed like a sovereign when he entered Prague
again. He now became the recognised leader of the whole nation. The <i>Národní
Listy</i> became the mouthpiece of all the most eminent leaders of the nation
without party distinction. Its issue of October 31, 1917, contained a map of the future independent Czecho-Slovak State and a series of articles. We
will quote only a few passages from an article written by deputy Rašín
which read as follows:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The war has brought our problem home not only to us
but to the whole world. Nothing could have better expressed our situation than
the propaganda of Mitteleuropa. Austria-Hungary and Bulgaria had to form a
bridge for the imperialistic march of Germany to the Persian Gulf <i>via</i> Constantinople
and Bagdad. The Czechs and Yugoslavs were to be crushed and become the victims
of those plans. This was the ideal that the German nation considered as its war
aim and as a war aim of Austria-Hungary. They could not have obtained a better
reply than was given to them by the Czechs and Yugoslavs in their demand for
their own independent states, which would be able to form a permanent bulwark
against the <i>Drang nach Osten</i> as planned by the Germans and Magyars. Even
if Herr Naumann ceases to promote the idea of Central Europe, in reality <i>a
new programme which would do away with the old evils and assign a new mission
to </i><i>Austria-Hungary</i><i> is inconceivable</i>. All the declarations of
the government are only destined to conceal their real intentions. The
German-Magyar hegemony is as strong as ever, and the Polish question is to be
solved only according to the Pan-German programme. During this war Austria's
real face has been unmasked before the whole world by her persecutions,
arbitrary decrees and the Pan-German propaganda.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Czechs, who in their policy always went hand in
hand with the Yugoslavs, saw all this, and consequently the only thing left for
them to do is to insist on their attitude, constantly to reveal Austria's
insincerity, to reject all pretty phrases without any meaning in them, and all
compromises, which we know would never be kept. <i>We also must reject a
compromise peace which would lead to fresh wars</i>.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>The policy of the Czechs cannot but aim at the
absolute independence of the whole Czecho-Slovak nation</i>, and all our action
at home and abroad must tend towards persuading the world that only thus can a
stable peace in Europe be achieved."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>It was about this time also when Seidler made desperate
attempts to induce the Slav leaders to participate in a special commission for
the revision of the Austrian Constitution. Dr. Stránský, speaking in the name
of the Czechs, openly refused the proposal, declaring that the Czech problem
could not be solved by Austria, but only by the Peace Conference, that is after
the victory of the Entente. A joint committee of representatives of the Young
Czech, National Socialist, Progressive Independence and Moravian Progressive
Parties issued a proclamation protesting against any participation of Czechs in
Austrian politics, and declaring that since the Czech question is an
international one and can therefore be decided only at the Peace Conference,
the duty of the Czech deputies is not to assist in the revision of the Austrian
Constitution, but to insist upon the creation of an "<i>independent
Czecho-Slovak State with all the attributes of sovereignty</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Simultaneously also the Czech Agrarian deputy, <i>Zahradník</i>,
made the following remarkable declaration in the Reichsrat on September 26:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"In view of the prevailing policy directed against the
Czech people, can any one wonder that <i>they have lost all confidence in </i><i>Vienna</i>
and that they refuse to let this parliament decide their fate? <i>It is
necessary to secure for all peoples, great or small, the right to decide their
own destinies</i>. This applies also to the ten million Czecho-Slovaks who,
moreover, cannot rightly be considered merely as a 'small' nation: the Czechs,
too, do not desire anything more than peace, but it must not be forgotten <i>that
our men did not shed their blood merely for imperialism or for Pan-Germanism. We
do not want anything but an honourable peace which would bring equality to all
peoples</i>, a peace assuring liberty and equality to all, and not a peace
which would leave our fetters unbroken. We regret that the Pope omitted to
mention the Czechs in his peace offer although he mentioned the Poles. <i>But
we shall obtain our right without alien support. The Czechs will never swerve
from their demand for an independent </i><i>Slovak</i><i> </i><i>State</i><i>
with all the attributes of sovereignty. The Czechs are convinced that the
question of </i><i>Bohemia</i><i> is too great to be solved in </i><i>Vienna</i><i>.
It must be decided at the Peace Conference</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On November 9, deputy Staněk made it clear that the
Czecho-Slovaks expect the resurrection of their independence only from the
break-up of Austria:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We cannot conceive of peace or of the transformation
of Europe except when <i>on the ruins of the Dual Monarchy</i> new national
states shall arise. The German-Magyar misrule must be destroyed."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>And when on November 21 Seidler talked about the peace
conditions of the "enemy," Dr. Stránský interrupted him by
exclaiming, "Our enemies are here, in Vienna and in Budapest!"</p>
<p class=Section><a name=PeaceWithRussia><i>(d) During Peace Negotiations with </i></a><i>Russia</i></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>When peace negotiations were opened with the Bolsheviks, the
Austro-Hungarian delegations were also summoned, for the first time during the
war, on December 3, 1917. During the speech from the throne the Czechs demonstratively
left the hall. On the same day the Bohemian Union, the Yugoslav Club and the
Ruthenes issued a protest against the government having published a distorted
version of the Russian peace offer. In this protest the Slav deputies asked:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"How can the government answer for having purposely
distorted such a highly important document as the Russian Note of November 28,
and why did the government suppress just the paragraph out of it containing
guarantees for national self-determination?"</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Their declaration naturally exasperated the Germans and the
government. The organ of the Austrian Foreign Office, the <i>Fremdenblatt</i>,
expressed regret that the Slav parties in the Reichsrat "place obstacles
in the way of peace." It also regretted that "some parties in the
Austrian Parliament should take up an attitude incompatible with our state's
self-preservation." On the next day, M. Staněk made a declaration in
the delegations in the name of Czechs and Yugoslavs, saying:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We Czech and Yugoslav delegates declare that it is
our deep conviction as well as the firm will of our respective nations that a
lasting peace is possible only on the ground of the full right of
self-determination. <i>The Imperial Government deliberately and wilfully
distorted the most important part of the Russian peace offer</i>, viz. the
demand for the self-determination of nations. It is still more surprising that
the prime ministers in both halves of the monarchy should try to deceive the
public opinion of the world by a false interpretation of the right of
self-determination. The Austrian Premier, Dr. Seidler, declared that the
Viennese Parliament is a forum through which the nations could obtain
self-determination, while the <i>Hungarian Premier had the impudence to
describe the conditions in </i><i>Hungary</i><i>, which are a mockery of all civilisation,
as the ideal of national liberty.</i> We, therefore, declare in regard to any
peace negotiations: <i>Our national development can only then be secured when
the right of self-determination of all nations shall be fully, clearly and
unreservedly recognised</i> with binding guarantees of its immediate
realisation."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>At the same time the Slavs made a proposal in the
Austro-Hungarian Delegations, insisting that the peace negotiations with Russia
should be conducted by a committee selected from both parliaments on the basis
of nationality, and consisting of twelve Germans, ten Magyars, ten
Czecho-Slovaks, seven Yugoslavs, five Poles, four Ruthenes, three Rumanians and
one Italian.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Finally, on December 5, the Czech Socialist deputy Tusar declared
in the Reichsrat:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We want to be our own masters, and if it is high
treason to ask for liberty and independence, then let us say at once that <i>each
of us is a traitor, but such high treason is an honour, and not a dishonour</i>.
As regards the negotiations with Russia, we declare that <i>Count Czernin does
not represent the nations of </i><i>Austria</i> and has no right to speak in
our name; he is merely the plenipotentiary of the dynasty. <i>The old </i><i>Austria</i><i>,
based on police, bureaucracy, militarism and racial tyranny, cannot survive
this war</i>. We also want peace, but it must be a just peace. The
Czecho-Slovaks will under all circumstances defend their rights."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In conjunction with this declaration we may quote two other
Czech Socialists showing the opinion of the Czechs on the Russian Revolution.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On November 29, deputy Modráček declared in the
Reichsrat:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Revolution of the Bolsheviks is a misfortune for
the Russian Revolution, the Russian Republic and all the oppressed nations of Europe.
<i>So long as the German Social Democracy permits the working masses to be
brought to the battlefield in the interests of Imperialism, the action of the
Bolsheviks is not the work for Socialism but for German Tsarism</i>. I do not
undervalue the significance and the greatness of the Russian Revolution: it is
the German Social Democrats who fail to perform their moral duty in this war
and do not comprehend the Russian Revolution."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Still more outspoken is the declaration of deputy Winter,
who said in the Reichsrat on February 21, 1918:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The workers of the whole world will never forget that
the Russian Revolution was the first social revolution on a large scale. And on
this revolutionary movement Germany has directly and Austria-Hungary indirectly
declared war. <i>Perhaps </i><i>Austria-Hungary</i><i> wants to repay the
Romanoffs in</i> 1918 <i>for the aid which they rendered to the Habsburgs in</i>
1848.... Austria-Hungary once before engaged in the European reaction by
crushing revolution in Italy. She gathered the fruits of this act in 1848,
1859, 1866, and in the present war. Formerly France and Russia participated in
the Holy Alliance, but <i>to-day the Central Powers are the only refuge of
reaction in </i><i>Europe</i>."</p>
<p class=Section><a name=ConstituentAssembly><i>(e) The Constituent Assembly of
</i></a><i>Prague</i><i> on </i><i>January</i> 6, 1918</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The most important manifestation of Czecho-Slovak national
will took place in Prague on January 6, 1918, when all the Czech deputies
assembled in order to give expression to their deep gratitude for the French
recognition of the constitution of a Czecho-Slovak army on the side of the
Entente. At the same time it was a protest against Austria-Hungary and a demand
for representation at the Peace Conference.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>As to the resolution unanimously adopted by this constituent
assembly, there is no doubt about its meaning: in it the Czecho-Slovaks no more
act with Austria but demand full liberty. This even the Austrian Premier, Dr.
Seidler, had to admit, when he declared in the Reichsrat on January 22:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"This resolution, in which we in vain look for a
distant echo of dynastic or state allegiance, adopts to a certain extent an
international standpoint, and shows that this people is ready, at any rate on
the conclusion of peace, to accept international support with a view to
obtaining the recognition of foreign states. Such a standpoint is calculated to
encourage our enemies and to prolong the war.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The resolution demands the right of
self-determination in order to dissolve the existing unity of the state, and to
assure full independence and sovereignty. <i>The resolution gives the
impression of having been conceived in a sense absolutely hostile to the state</i>,
and must be indignantly rejected by every Austrian and resisted by every
Austrian Government with all the means in its power."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czech declaration of January 6, which is the most
important of all declarations of the Czechs and which has been suppressed in
the Austrian press, reads as follows:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"In the fourth year of this terrible war, which has
already cost the nations numberless sacrifices in blood and treasure, the first
peace efforts have been inaugurated. We Czech deputies recognise the
declarations in the Reichsrat, and deem it our duty emphatically to declare, in
the name of the Czech nation and of its oppressed and forcibly-silenced Slovak
branch of Hungary, our attitude towards the reconstruction of the international
situation.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"When the Czech deputies of our regenerated nation
expressed themselves, during the Franco-Prussian War, on the international
European problems, they solemnly declared in the memorandum of December 8,
1870, that 'only from the recognition of the equality of all nations and from
natural respect of the right of self-determination could come true equality and
fraternity, a general peace and true humanity.'</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We, deputies of the Czech nation, true even to-day to
these principles of our ancestors, have therefore greeted with joy the fact
that all states, based upon democratic principles, whether belligerent or
neutral, now accept with us the right of nations to free self-determination as
a guarantee of a general and lasting peace.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The new Russia also accepted the principle of
self-determination of nations during its attempts for a general settlement and
as a fundamental condition of peace. The nations were freely to determine their
fate and decide whether they want to live in an independent state of their own
or whether they choose to form one state in common with other nations.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"On the other hand, the Austro-Hungarian delegate
declared, in the name of the Quadruple Alliance, that the question of the
self-determination of those nations which have not hitherto enjoyed political
independence should be solved in a constitutional manner within the existing
state. This point of view of the Austro-Hungarian representative is not our
point of view, because we know, from our own numberless bitter experiences,
that it means nothing but the negation of the principle of self-determination.
We indignantly express our regret that our nation was deprived of its political
independence and of the right of self-determination, and that by means of
artificial electoral statutes we were left to the mercy of the German minority
and of the government of the centralised German bureaucracy.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Our brother Slovaks became the victims of Magyar
brutality and of unspeakable violence in a state which, notwithstanding all its
apparent constitutional liberties, remains the darkest corner of Europe, and in
which the non-Magyars who form the majority of the population are ruthlessly
oppressed by the ruling minority, extirpated, and denationalised from
childhood, unrepresented in parliament and the civil service, and deprived of
public schools as well as of all private educational institutions.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The constitution to which the Austro-Hungarian
representative refers, nullified even the right of general suffrage by an
artificial creation of an over-representation of the German minority in the
Reichsrat, and its utter uselessness for the liberty of nations was clearly
demonstrated during the three years of unscrupulous military absolutism during
this war. Every reference to this constitution, therefore, means in reality
only a repudiation of the right of self-determination for the non-German
nations of Austria who are at the mercy of the Germans: and it means an
especially cruel insult and injury to the non-Magyar nations <i>in Hungary,
where the constitution is nothing but a means of shameful domination by the oligarchy
of a few Magyar aristocratic families</i>, as was again proved by the recent
electoral reform proposal.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Our nation longs with all the democracies of the
world for a general and lasting peace. But our nation is fully aware that <i>no
peace can be permanent except a peace which will abolish old injustice</i>,
brutal force and the predominance of arms, as well as the predominance of
states and nations over other nations, which will assure a free development to
all nations, great or small, and which will liberate especially those nations
which are still suffering under foreign domination. That is why it is necessary
that this right of free national development and of self-determination of
nations, great or small, to whatever state they may belong, should become the
foundation of future international rights, a guarantee of peace, and of a
friendly co-operation of nations, as well as a great ideal which will liberate
humanity from the terrible horrors of a world war.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>We deputies of the Czech nation declare that a peace
which would not bring our nation full liberty could not be and would not mean a
peace to us</i>, but would only be the beginning of a new, desperate and
continuous struggle for our political independence, in which our nation would
strain to the utmost its material and moral forces. And in that uncompromising
struggle it would never relax until its aim had been achieved. <i>Our nation
asks for independence</i> on the ground of its historic rights, and is imbued
with the fervent desire to contribute towards the new development of humanity
on the basis of liberty and fraternity in a free competition with other free
nations, which our nation hopes to accomplish in a sovereign, equal, democratic
and socially just state of its own, built upon the equality of all its citizens
within the historic boundaries of the Bohemian lands and of Slovakia,
guaranteeing full and equal national rights to all minorities.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Guided by these principles, we solemnly protest
against the rejection of the right of self-determination at the peace
negotiations, and <i>demand that, in the sense of this right, all nations,
including, therefore, also the Czecho-Slovaks, be guaranteed participation and
full freedom of defending their rights at the Peace Conference</i>."</p>
<p class=Section><a name=OathoftheNation>(f) <i>The Oath of the Czecho-Slovak
Nation</i></a></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>It will be remembered that Count Czernin delivered a speech
to the Vienna Municipal Council on April 2, 1918, which caused his downfall. In
this pronouncement he also attacked Czech leaders and blamed them for the
failure of his peace efforts. This interesting passage of his speech reads as
follows:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"What terrible irony it is that, while our brothers
and sons are fighting like lions on the battlefield and millions of men and
women at home are heroically bearing their losses and are sending up urgent prayers
to the Almighty for the speedy termination of the war, certain leaders of the
people and the people's representatives agitate against the German Alliance,
which has so splendidly stood the test, <i>pass resolutions which no longer
have the slightest connection with the state idea, find no word of blame for
the Czech troops which criminally fight against their own country</i> and their
brothers-in-arms, would tear parts out of the Hungarian State, under the
protection of their parliamentary immunity <i>make speeches which cannot be
considered otherwise than as a call to enemy countries to continue the struggle</i>
solely in order to support their own political efforts, and ever anew kindle
the expiring war spirit in London, Rome and Paris. <i>The wretched and
miserable Masaryk is not the only one of his kind. There are also Masaryks
within the borders of the monarchy.</i> I would much rather have spoken on this
sad matter in the delegations, but, as I have already mentioned, the convoking
of the committee has at present proved to be impossible and I cannot
wait."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Thereupon he attempted to absolve the Czech
"people" from the charge of high treason.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czech leaders did not resent his charge that they were
"traitors" like Masaryk. Indeed, the <i>Lidové Noviny</i> openly
declared: "We are proud to be called traitors." But they resented his
subsequent allegation that the Czech people do not stand behind their leaders.
In order to refute this allegation and to assure the Czech soldiers fighting on
the side of the Entente of their solidarity, the Czechs summoned a meeting at Prague
in which some 6000 <i>delegates of all Czech parties and classes took part</i>,
as well as twenty-three delegates of the Yugoslavs. The meeting was most solemn
and impressive. It was a new manifestation by the whole nation of its unanimity
in the struggle for independence. The Czecho-Yugoslav solidarity was again
emphasised. Finally, a solemn oath was unanimously taken by the whole assembly.
The following are some of its passages:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"To the Czecho-Slovak Nation!</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The terrible world war is approaching its
culmination. In awe and sorrow a great number of Czecho-Slovak men and women
are standing here.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Czecho-Slovak blood has been and is still being
shed in torrents.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Unbroken, united in suffering, our nation believed
and believes that the storm of the world war will ultimately result in a better
future and that its humanitarian ideals will be sanctioned by a universal peace
which will forever guard humanity against a repetition of the present
catastrophe.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We never asked for anything but to be able to live a
free life, to govern our own destinies free from foreign domination, and to
erect our own state after the manner of all other civilised nations. That is
our sacred right. It is the national and international right of a nation which
has done great service to civilisation and can proudly range itself among the
most civilised and democratic nations of Europe.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"This is the firm and unanimous will of the nation:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>We have assembled here to-day as the legitimate
representatives of the Czecho-Slovak nation in order to manifest unmistakably
that the whole nation is united as it never was before, and that it stands like
a rock behind the memorable and historic declarations of its deputies</i>.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>So we are standing here, firmly convinced of the
ultimate victory of Justice, of the victory of Right over Might, of Liberty
over Tyranny, of Democracy over Privilege and of Truth over Falsehood and
Deceit</i>.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"At the cross-roads of history, we swear by the
glorious memory of our ancestors, before the eyes of the sorrow-stricken
nation, over the graves of those who have fallen for the cause of liberty,
to-day and for all eternity:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>We will hold on and will never give way!</i></p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>We will be faithful in all our work, struggles and
sufferings, faithful unto death!</i></p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>We will hold on unto victory!</i></p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>We will hold on until our nation obtains
independence</i>.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>Long live the Czecho-Slovak nation!</i></p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Let our nation grow and flourish freely in the great
family of nations, for its own welfare as well as for the welfare of the future
liberated humanity!"</p>
<p class=Section><a name=SlovakAttitude><i>(g) The Slovaks' Attitude</i></a></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The appalling terrorism prevailing in Hungary made it
impossible for the Slovaks to manifest their feelings as they would have liked
to do. The Slovaks abroad, of course, work hand in hand with the Czechs for
their common cause.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Nevertheless, even in Hungary the Slovaks showed their
unanimity with the Czechs.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>According to the <i>Národní Listy</i> of July 24, 1917, the
Slovak political leaders, especially their two deputies, Father P. Juriga and
Dr. P. Blaho, and the veteran leader of the Slovak National Party, M. Dula,
have been subjected to all sorts of persuasions and threats on the part of the
Magyars who were anxious that the Slovaks should disavow the declaration of the
Bohemian Club in favour of the union of all Czechs and Slovaks in an
independent state. The Slovak leaders, however, refused to become the dupes of
the Magyar Government.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>According to the <i>Národní Listy</i> of May 5, 1918, a great manifestation was arranged by Slovak Socialists in St. Miklos on May
1 in favour of the union of the Hungarian Slovaks with the Czechs of Bohemia, Moravia
and Silesia. Several thousand Slovaks took part in the manifestation despite
the obstacles put in the way by the Magyar gendarmerie and police spies. A
resolution was carried unanimously demanding amongst other things a just and
lasting peace which would prevent the outbreak of fresh conflagrations and
assure liberty to all nations in Europe, and "<i>self-determination for
all nations</i>, including also that branch of the Czecho-Slovak nation which
lives in Hungary." Besides this manifestation, the Slovaks sent
representative delegates to the National Theatre celebrations in Prague, with
which we deal in our next chapter.</p>
<p class=Section><a name=NationalCouncil><i>(h) The Czecho-Slovak National
Council in </i></a><i>Prague</i></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On July 13, 1918, an important event took place in Prague.
The Czecho-Slovaks established an inter-party council which may well be
described as part of the <i>Provisional Government of Bohemia</i>, whose
programme is identical with that of the Czecho-Slovak Provisional Government in
Paris.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The inaugural meeting of the council in Prague was opened by
the president of the Agrarian Party, Mr. Švehla, who gave a report about
the preparatory work and principles which led to the constitution of the
council. On the proposal of M. Staněk, president of the Union of Czech
Deputies, <i>Dr. Karel Kramář</i>, the leader of the Independent
Democratic Party, was elected president of the council, <i>M. Klofáč</i>,
leader of the National Socialists, and <i>M. Švehla</i> vice-presidents,
and <i>Dr. Soukup</i>, leader of the Socialists, secretary. Dr. Kramář
greeted the assembly in the name of the presidency. Afterwards deputy
Klofáč delivered a speech in the name of the Socialists, and the
vice-president of the Czech Union, supported by deputy Habermann, proposed that
the presidency should itself select members of the council. The proposal was
unanimously accepted. Deputy Staněk greeted the National Council in the
name of the Czech Union as the supreme representative of the whole
Czecho-Slovak nation, of all its classes and parties. Thereupon Dr. Soukup
proposed a resolution which was carried unanimously and the chief passages of
which read as follows:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"To the Czecho-Slovak Nation!</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"On the decision of all political parties,
representing the united will of our whole nation, the Czecho-Slovak National
Council has been formed to-day. The immense gravity of the present times and
our common concern for the future fate of the Czecho-Slovak nation have united
us in a national organisation.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The ultimate aim of the Czecho-Slovak National
Council in Prague is postulated by the demand of these times: <i>to enlist for
systematic work, to organise and lead the great spiritual, moral and national
resources of the nation</i> to that end which is the most sacred and
inalienable right of every nation and which cannot and will not be denied also
to our nation:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>The right of self-determination in a fully
independent </i><i>Czecho-Slovak</i><i> </i><i>State</i><i> with its own
administration within its own borders and under its own sovereignty</i>.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Czecho-Slovak National Council wish to interpret
this will of the nation and to be the executive organ of all the common
declarations of its delegates which culminated in the solemn oath of April 13, 1918.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Our work will not be easy. We shall have to suffer
much more opposition and <i>we shall have to undergo another great test.</i>
But no obstacles are able to arrest our nation's progress. In full mutual
agreement with our delegates and with the whole cultural and economic Czech
world, the Czecho-Slovak National Council will faithfully fulfil its difficult
and responsible task, so that it may be truly said before the conscience of the
nation that we did everything that was in our human power.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>We know that our whole nation stands behind the
Czecho-Slovak National Council</i> as one united rampart. Full of joy at the
great political act which the constitution of the National Council represents,
and full of confidence in the victory of our common cause, we address to-day to
the whole Czecho-Slovak nation an urgent appeal to support our work with all
its strength, to obey all orders of common discipline and to follow firmly our
common national aim."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>It is significant that the presidency of this council is
composed of four of the most eminent leaders of the four greatest parties in Bohemia:
Dr. Kramář, Klofáč, Švehla and Soukup. All of these have been in
prison during this war, as well as the following members of the council: Dr.
Rašín and Červinka, friends of Kramář; Cyril Dušek, former
editor of Masaryk's organ <i>The Times</i>; Dr. Scheiner, president of the
"Sokol" Gymnastic Association; and Machar, the eminent Czech poet.
Besides these the members of the council include: the Socialist leaders
Bechyně, Habermann, Krejčí, Němec, Stivín, Meissner, Tusar and
Vaněk; the Clerical leaders Hruban, Šrámek and Kordáč; the
author Jirásek; Agrarians Staněk (president of the Czech Union),
Udržal and Zahradník, Dr. Herben, of Professor Masaryk's party, and
others. <i>All Czech parties are represented on the council without exception,</i>
from the Socialists on the extreme Left to the Clericals on the extreme Right.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The council is the supreme organ of the Czecho-Slovak
nation, and represents all its classes and parties. It is a national organ and
its sole aim is to work for the welfare of Bohemia, without any regard to Austria.
It stands above all party politics and is the supreme organ to which all
disputes are referred that may arise affecting Czecho-Slovak national
interests. Its aim is, in the words of its proclamation, "to enlist for
systematic work, to organise and lead the great spiritual, moral and national
resources of the Czecho-Slovak nation." Its ultimate object is to realise
"the right of self-determination in a fully independent Czecho-Slovak State
with its own administration within its own borders and under its own
sovereignty." Its aims are obviously identical with those of the
Czecho-Slovak Government in Paris, who alone, of course, are able to exercise
the executive power as a government, especially to organise armies fighting on
the side of the Entente. On the other hand, the National Council in Prague is
organising the nation for the final blow which the Slavs will, no doubt at an
opportune moment, strike at the Dual Monarchy.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Immediately after this important event most significant
declarations were made by Czech deputies in the Reichsrat of Vienna. The Czech
deputy <i>Tusar</i> declared that "<i>the war must end with the creation
of a </i><i>Czecho-Slovak</i><i> </i><i>State</i>, with the victory of
democratic ideas and with the defeat of militarism and despotism. We will
obtain freedom, cost what it may." Thereupon the Czech deputies sang the
Czech national anthem.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The next day deputy <i>Stříbrný</i> delivered a speech
which we have quoted in a previous chapter.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The most significant speech, however, was that of <i>Dr.
Stránský</i> in the Austrian Reichsrat on July 23, which surpasses any of those
we have quoted hitherto in its frank anti-Austrian spirit and expression:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We want to expose and show up before the whole world
the <i>intolerable state of foreign domination over us</i>. You cannot prevent
us, not only before a helpless curtailed parliament, not only before an
illusory high court, but before the whole world, raising our voice against the
Premier who is a typical representative of that <i>Austria whose mere existence
is a constant and automatic prolongation of the war. One of the obstacles to
peace is the oppression of nationalities in Austria</i> and their domination by
the Germans. <i>In this war the Germans, even if they do not openly admit it,
have come to the conclusion that the German hegemony in </i><i>Central Europe</i><i>,
and especially in </i><i>Austria</i><i>, is standing on its last legs</i>.
Since they see that their predominance can no longer be maintained, they
endeavour to translate all that they have acquired into reality, so as to
secure the spoils for themselves. Thus the Germans conceived the idea of
establishing a province 'Deutschböhmen' which must be prepared by the
establishment of district governments. From this a very interesting conclusion
may be drawn--<i>that the Germans themselves lost faith in the further
existence of </i><i>Austria</i>, otherwise they would not be in a hurry to save
their province Deutschböhmen in the present Austria. Because they rather wish
for no Austria than for an Austria where they would not be able to rule, <i>they
are already counting upon the break-up of </i><i>Austria</i><i>:</i> since the
Germans do not want to accept the solution of a free Danubian confederation of
nations, they prepare already their union with the Hohenzollerns.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"But then we must ask the Germans to take nothing with
them that does not belong to them. It is more than questionable whether
Deutschböhmen really is German.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"There is another reason which speaks against the
creation of a Deutschböhmen. I am convinced that <i>if a plebiscite were
carried out among German people in </i><i>Northern Bohemia</i><i>, they would
declare against separation from </i><i>Bohemia</i>. Why? Because the Germans
are too clever not to know that Bohemia forms not only a historical and
geographical unity, but that this unity has besides a historical basis, also a
practical foundation. The relation between the Czech part of Bohemia and Northern
Bohemia is to a large degree the relation of the consumer and the producer.
Where do you want to export your articles if not to your Czech hinterland? How
could the German manufacturers otherwise exist? When after the war a Czecho-Slovak
State is erected, <i>the Germans of Bohemia will much rather remain in Bohemia
and live on good terms with the Czech peasant than be identified with Germany,
boycotted, opposed and hated by the whole world</i>, especially if we
guarantee, not only by promises, but by deeds and laws, full autonomy to the
German population within the Bohemian State.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"<i>The real question which puzzles us to-day is: How
can </i><i>Austria</i><i> exist at all?</i> That is the question. And I again
repeat solemnly Palacký's word that <i>Austria</i><i> may exist only so long as
her nations wish for it</i>, and that <i>she will cease to exist</i> as soon as
her nations do not want her to exist. The Slav nations of Austria declared
clearly and emphatically their wishes and desires in their proclamations. If
instead of working for the conversion of the ruling factor in favour of these
wishes Dr. Seidler shows us Gessler's hat of Austria with a German head and
backbone, then let him remember that <i>we shall hate this Austria for all
eternity</i> (loud cheers and applause) <i>and we shall fight her, and God
willing, we shall in the end smash her to pieces so completely that nothing
will remain of her</i>."</p>
<p class=BlockQuote><i>The President:</i> "I cannot admit such an
expression about this state and I call the deputy to order."</p>
<p class=BlockQuote><i>Dr. Stránský</i>: "Excellency, I really do not
deserve such a rebuke. It would be sad if we could not speak freely and with
proper emphasis against a state form which has been imposed upon us.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Let Dr. Seidler remember that <i>we regard </i><i>Austria</i><i>,
whose integrity according to him must not be questioned, as a centuries-old
crime on the liberties of humanity. Let him remember that it is not only our
political intention, not only our instinct of self-preservation, but our
highest duty and--do not hesitate to say so--our national religion and our greatest
moral mission to damage Austria wherever and whenever possible, and that our
loyalty to our own nation, to our native country, to our history, to our future
and to the Bohemian Crown, prompts us to betray Austria which is backed up by
Germany. We are therefore determined faithfully to betray her whenever and
wherever we can</i>. I tell you further, gentlemen, that this state, this Austria
which Seidler talks about, is not a state at all. <i>It is a hideous,
centuries-old dream, a nightmare, a beast, and nothing else</i>. It is a state
without a name, it is <i>a constitutional monarchy without a crown and without
a constitution</i>. For what kind of a constitution is it if it has not the
necessary confirmation by oath and won the general approval of nations because
it was found to be untenable? <i>It is a state without patriots and without
patriotism</i>, it is a state which arose by the amalgamation of eight
irredents--the German one included--it is a state which had no future and in
which the dynasty ... (suppressed) ... in a word, it is a state which is no
state at all. <i>As a matter of fact, </i><i>Austria</i><i> no longer exists</i>,
it is an absurdity and an impossibility. If I spoke about Czech regiments which
went to embrace their 'enemies,' I must admit that personally I know nothing
about them except what I heard from my German colleagues who persist in making
complaints against us. We believe every word of what they say to be true, but
... (suppressed by censor). Did you ever hear that a husband conscious of his
honour and respectability told the whole world about the infidelity of his wife
who left him because he ill-treated her? No, because the husband knows that it
is his shame and not hers. <i>And if Czecho-Slovak brigades are to-day fighting
against </i><i>Austria-Hungary</i><i> it is only a proof that there is
something very wrong with </i><i>Austria</i><i>, that </i><i>Austria</i><i> is
more rotten than Shakespeare's </i><i>Denmark</i><i>.</i> For what other state
has soldiers who ran over voluntarily to the enemy? You keep on saying that England
has the Irish problem. <i>Did you ever hear of Irish brigades, did you ever
hear that any French legions were fighting for the Central Powers against
France</i>, or Russian legions against Russia when we were at war with Russia?
Indeed, gentlemen, not even Turkey has any legions fighting with the enemy
against her. <i>There must therefore be some deep reason for Czecho-Slovak,
Polish and Yugoslav legions fighting on the side of the Entente</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>We think that any comments on this explicit declaration, in
which a Czech deputy representing his whole nation openly expressed hope for
the dismemberment of Austria and praised the Czecho-Slovak troops fighting for
the Allies, are superfluous.</p>
<p class=Chapter><a name=Cooperation>VIII</a></p>
<p class=ChapterDescription>CZECHO-SLOVAK CO-OPERATION WITH OTHER NON-GERMAN
NATIONS OF CENTRAL EUROPE</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czechs have always clearly seen that one of the chief reasons
which enable the German-Magyar minority to rule over the Slav majority is the
lack of co-operation amongst the subject peoples. Already before the war the
Czechs were pioneers of Slav solidarity and reciprocity, wrongly called
Pan-Slavism. Thanks to their geographic position, they have no claims
conflicting with any nations except the Germans and Magyars who are their only
enemies.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In these efforts for promoting Slav solidarity the Czechs
met serious obstacles. In the case of some of their Slav friends it was lack of
internal unity which prevented co-operation. In other cases it was the quarrels
artificially fomented by Austria between her subject nations, notably between
the Poles and Ruthenes and between the Yugoslavs and Italians. Finally, the Poles
lacked a definite international point of view. They were justly sceptical of
Slav solidarity seeing that they were oppressed by a government which claimed
to represent a great Slav nation.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>All these obstacles, however, have one by one disappeared as
the war has gone on. All the subject peoples of Central Europe saw that they
were persecuted and driven to be slaughtered by the same enemies in Berlin, Vienna
and Budapest. The oppressed races found at last that they have common
aspirations and interests, and the collapse of Russia to-day makes even the
Poles realise where their real enemies are. The Polish people may to-day have
only one orientation: against the Central Powers. It is an inspiriting sign
that even some Polish "Realpoliticians" begin to realise that Austria
is doomed and that it is bad politics to count upon Vienna, to say nothing of Berlin.</p>
<p class=Section><a name=CongressOfRome><i>(a) The Congress of </i></a><i>Rome</i></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In order to give practical expression to the growing sense
of co-operation amongst the oppressed nations of Austria-Hungary, their
representatives assembled in Rome at the beginning of April, 1918. In those
days the great spirit of Mazzini revived again in Rome, and from that moment Italy
definitely became the champion of the movement of the oppressed nations of Austria-Hungary
towards independence.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The congress was attended by numerous Italian senators,
deputies, ministers and other leading men. The Yugoslav Committee was
represented by its president, Dr. Trumbić, the Dalmatian sculptor
Mestrović, the Bosnian deputy Stojanović and others; the
Czecho-Slovak Council by Dr. Beneš and Colonel Štefanik; the Poles by
the Galician deputy Mr. Zamorski, and by Messrs. Seyda, Skirmunt, Loret and
others; the Rumanians by the senators Draghicescu and Minorescu, the deputy
Lupu and the Transylvanians Mandrescu and De Luca. The Serbian Skupština
sent a deputation of twelve deputies and a delegation of officers from the
Yugoslav division at Salonica. Among the foreign visitors invited to the
congress were M. Franklin-Bouillon, President of the Foreign Affairs Committee
of the French Chamber of Deputies, the ex-minister M. Albert Thomas, M.
Fournol, M. Pierre de Quirielle, Mr. H.W. Steed, Mr. Seton-Watson, and Mr.
Nelson Gay.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The congress unanimously adopted the following general
resolutions agreed upon between the various nationalities and the special
Italo-Yugoslav Convention concluded between Messrs. Torre and Trumbić:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The representatives of the nationalities subjected in
whole or in part to the rule of Austria-Hungary--the Italians, Poles, Rumanians,
Czechs and Yugoslavs--join in affirming their principles of common action as
follows:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"1. Each of these peoples proclaims its right to
constitute its own nationality and state unity or to complete it and to attain
full political and economic independence.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"2. Each of these peoples recognises in the
Austro-Hungarian Monarchy the instrument of German domination and the
fundamental obstacle to the realisation of its aspirations and rights.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"3. The assembly recognises the necessity of a common
struggle against the common oppressors, in order that each of these peoples may
attain complete liberation and national unity within a free state.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The representatives of the Italian people and of the
Yugoslav people in particular agree as follows:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"1. In the relations between the Italian nation and
the nation of the Serbs, Croats, and Slovenes--known also under the name of the
Yugoslav nation--the representatives of the two peoples recognise that the
unity and independence of the Yugoslav nation is of vital interest to Italy,
just as the completion of Italian national unity is of vital interest to the
Yugoslav nation, and therefore pledge themselves to employ every effort in
order that at the moment of the peace these decisions <i>(finalita)</i> of the
two nations may be completely attained.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"2. They declare that the liberation of the Adriatic
Sea and its defence against every present and future enemy is of vital
interest to the two peoples.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"3. They pledge themselves also in the interest of
good and sincere relations between the two peoples in the future, to solve
amicably the various territorial controversies on the basis of the principles
of nationality and of the right of peoples to decide their own fate, and in
such a way as not to injure the vital interests of the two nations, as they
shall be defined at the moment of peace.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"4. To such racial groups <i>(nuclei)</i> of one
people as it may be found necessary to include within the frontiers of the
other there shall be recognised and guaranteed the right of preserving their
own language, culture, and moral and economic interests."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Polish delegates laid before the congress a special
memorandum of their own from which we quote the following:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The Polish question admits of no cut-and-dried
solution and of no compromise. Poland will either be saved by the Allies or she
will become dependent upon Germany, whether the latter is associated with Austria
or not; above all, upon all-powerful Prussia.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"There is only one way of avoiding this latter
alternative, and that is by countering the plans of the Central Powers with
regard to Poland by the proclamation of the Polish programme, which is that of
the Allies. This programme is the restitution to Poland of the mouth of the Vistula,
of Dantzig and of the Polish portion of the Baltic coastline. This programme
will prevent Lithuania and the Ukraine from becoming instruments of
Prusso-German oppression and Austrian intrigue. It is only such a Poland as
this which will be able to fulfil its historic mission as a rampart against the
Germans.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Its resistance will be still more effectual when
united with that of an independent Czecho-Slovak State, and of a strong Rumania,
healed of all the wounds inflicted by the war, and if, at the same time, the
Yugoslav peoples achieve their unity and independence. The Poles, in claiming
the Polish districts of Austria, declare themselves categorically for the
complete liberation of Bohemia, which would otherwise be left at the mercy of
the German-Austrians. <i>The independence of neighbouring </i><i>Bohemia</i><i>
is as necessary to an independent </i><i>Poland</i><i> as a great independent </i><i>Poland</i><i>
is necessary to the very existence of </i><i>Bohemia</i><i>.</i> The united
forces of the Polish, Czecho-Slovak and Rumanian nations, forming a great belt
from the Baltic to the Black Sea, will prove a barrier against the German
'Drang nach Osten.' For, since the collapse of Russia, these are the only real
forces upon which the Allies can depend."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On the day following the congress its leaders were
officially received by the Italian Premier, Signer Orlando, who conveyed to them
the warm greetings of the government:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We have seen with keen satisfaction this assembly
here in Rome, where for centuries the representative spirits of all peoples and
races have always found refuge, and where hard facts seem to assume a prophetic
form and ideal meaning.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"These neighbouring nationalities are, in their turn,
subjected to Austria, and it has only been the traditional astuteness of this
state which has unchained the ethnic passions of the oppressed races, inciting
one against the other in order more easily to rule them. Hence, it seems
natural and necessary to follow the opposite policy from that which has so
greatly helped the enemy, <i>and to establish a solidarity sprung from common
suffering</i>. There is no substantial reason for a quarrel, if we sincerely
examine the conditions of mutual existence, remember the mutual sacrifices and
agree in our determination to grant just guarantees to those racial minorities
which necessity may assign to one or the other of the different state groups.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Italy should be able to understand better than any
other country the aspirations of the nationalities, since the history of Italy,
now completed, is simply your history now awaiting completion.... No other
people, before forming itself into a free and independent state, had to undergo
so long an apprenticeship, so methodical an oppression, such varied forms of
violence. Like generous Poland, Italy was shattered, partitioned by strangers,
and treated for centuries as a <i>res nullius. The firm resolve of the Bohemian
people to revive the glorious kingdom which has so valiantly stemmed the onset
of the Germans is the same resolve which moved our ancestors and our fathers to
conspiracy and revolt, that </i><i>Italy</i><i> might become a united state</i>.
The impetuous and vigorous character of the Southern Slavs and the Rumanians of
Transylvania already has led to the making of heroes and martyrs; and here they
are met by the endless stream of our heroes and martyrs; who across time and
space fraternise on the scaffold erected by their common enemy.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"For your nations 'To be or not to be' is the
inexorable choice at this moment. Here cautious subtleties are of no avail, nor
the adroit reservations borrowed from diplomacy, nor discussions more or less
Byzantine, 'while the Turk is at the gates.' The necessities are Faith and
Work; it is thus that nations are formed."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>We have already mentioned that the U.S. Government
identified themselves with the resolutions adopted by the Rome Conference. As
regards Great Britain, Lord Robert Cecil made the following declaration on May 23, 1918:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Above all <i>I welcome especially the recent congress
at </i><i>Rome</i>, which has done so much to strengthen the Alliance of which Italy
is a part. I believe that the congress was valuable for its wisdom and its
moderation. I believe that it was valuable for the spirit of brotherhood which
it displayed. But above all I welcome it because it showed that the Italian
Government, as expressed by the speech of the Italian Prime Minister (Signor
Orlando), recognise to the full that the principles on which the kingdom of
Italy was founded were not only of local application, but extend to
international relations. (Cheers) <i>Italy has shown herself ready to extend to
the Poles, to those gallant Czecho-Slovaks, to the Rumanians, and last, but not
least, to the Yugoslavs, the principles on which her own 'Risorgimento' was
founded</i>, and on which she may still go forward to a greater future than she
has ever seen in the past. (Cheers.) <i>That is a great work, and those who
have borne any part in it may well be proud of their accomplishment</i>.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"People talk sometimes about the dismemberment of Austria.
I have no weakness for Austria; but I venture to think that that is the wrong
point of view. The way to regard this problem is not the dismemberment of Austria,
<i>but the liberation of the population subject to her rule. We are anxious to
see all these peoples in the enjoyment of full liberty and independence; able
by some great federation to hold up in Central Europe the principles upon which
European policy must be founded,</i> unless we are to face disasters too
horrible to contemplate. The old days of arbitrary allotment of this population
or that to this sovereignty or that are gone--and, I trust, gone forever. We
must look for any future settlement, to a settlement not of courts or cabinets,
but of nations and populations. <i>On that alone depends the whole conception
of the </i><i>League of Nations</i><i>,</i> of which we have heard so much; and
unless that can be secured as the foundation for that great idea, I myself despair
of its successful establishment."</p>
<p class=Section><a name=MayManifestations><i>(b) The May Manifestations in </i></a><i>Prague</i></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>A direct re-percussion of the Rome Conference was the great
meeting which took place in Prague on May 16, on the occasion of the jubilee
celebration of the foundation of the Czech National Theatre.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The manifestations took pre-eminently a political character,
especially as they were attended by numerous distinguished foreign guests.
These included delegates from all parts of the Southern Slav territories,
Poles, Rumanians and Italians. The Russians, although invited, could not take
part, because of the obstacles placed in the way by the Austrian Government. As
regards the Yugoslavs, there were over 100 delegates from the Slovene districts
alone, including Dr. Pogačnik, deputies Ravničar and Rybář, the
Mayor of Lublanja, Dr. Tavčar, President of the Chamber of Commerce, J.
Kněz and others. The Yugoslavs were further represented by Count
Vojnovitch and M. Hribar, by delegates of the Croatian Starčević
Party, the Serbian Dissidents, Dr. Budisavljević, Mr. Val
Pribičević, Dr. Sunarić, Mr. Sola from Bosnia, representatives
of the national, cultural, economic institutions, and representatives of the
city of Zagreb, with the mayor, Dr. Srpulje, at the head.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>There were seventeen Italians with deputies Conci and De
Caspari at the head. The Rumanians from Hungary and Bukovina also arrived. The
Slovaks of Hungary met with the most hearty welcome. They were led by the poet
Hviezdoslav. An inspiring feature was the presence of the Poles, of whom about
sixty took part in the manifestations, the majority of them from Galicia, three
from Silesia and one from Posen.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The delegation from Galicia included prominent
representatives of the Polish Democratic Party, Count Dr. A. Skarbek, deputy
and ex-minister Glombínski and deputy Witoš, the Socialist leader
Moraczewski whose father took part in the Pan-Slav Congress of Prague in 1848,
deputy Tetmajer, representatives of the cities of Lvoff and Cracow and of the
University of Cracow, members of municipal and county councils, journalists,
artists, painters, sculptors, authors and others.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>At a meeting arranged in honour of the Slav guests, Dr.
Kramář declared that "the Czech nation is stronger to-day than ever
before. There is no worse policy than that which gives in before danger. I am
sure that our people will not give way. We have suffered so much that there is
no horror which could divert us from the path we follow. Happily enough, we see
that what we want is also desired by the whole world. We see that we are not
alone. To-day the representatives of other nations, which have suffered in the
same way as ourselves, have come to us. Of course, they did not come to us only
to take part in our festivals, but also to express on the Bohemian soil their
determination that their nations want to live freely. We are united by the same
interests. Our victory is theirs and theirs is ours."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Yugoslav deputy Radič thanked the Czechs, in the
name of the Yugoslavs, for unity and solidarity. The Polish deputy Moraczewski
expressed his thanks not only for the welcome accorded to the Poles in Prague,
but also for the proclamation of the watchword: "For your liberty and
ours!"</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The main celebrations took place in the Bohemian Museum on
May 16. Since the speeches delivered on that occasion were of such significance
and are sure to prove of great international importance in the near future, we
propose to quote at least the chief passages from them.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The first speaker was Dr. Kramář who declared:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"You know that they are in vain trying to crush us.
Every wrong will come back to the authors. That is our firm belief, and
therefore you will find no despondency in Bohemia, but only <i>firm
determination not only to defend to the last the integrity of our kingdom, but
also to accomplish the unity of the whole Czecho-Slovak nation. We firmly
believe in the ultimate victory of the right of nations to liberty and
self-determination.</i> And we therefore welcome you in our beautiful golden
city of Prague, because we know that your presence here to-day is the best
proof that our faith is the faith of all nations who have hitherto been
clamouring in vain for right and justice.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Allow me to make a personal remark. We were far away
from public life, confined in prison, and only very little news reached us.
Various events filled us with anxiety and despondency. Bohemia seemed to be
like a large, silent and dead churchyard. And all of a sudden we heard that
underneath the shroud with which they tried to cover our nation there still was
some life. Czech books were read more than ever, and the life of the national
soul expressed itself in the performances in the National Theatre. When we
heard about the storm of enthusiasm which greeted the prophecy in Smetana's
opera <i>Libusha</i>, we felt suddenly relieved, and we knew that our
sufferings were not in vain.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We placed everything that we want into the prophecy
of Libusha--a new life, free, not constrained by disfavour or misunderstanding.
<i>We do not want to remain within the limits prescribed to us by </i><i>Vienna</i>
(applause), we want to be entire masters of our national life as a whole. We do
not need foreign spirit and foreign advice; our best guide is our past, the
great democratic traditions of our nation. We have enough strength and
perseverance not to be afraid of anything that threatens us, because <i>we want
the full freedom for the whole nation, including the millions of our oppressed
brothers beneath the </i><i>Tatra Mountains</i>. (A stormy applause.)</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"That does not depend on any circumstances outside our
scope; it depends entirely upon ourselves, upon our will. <i>We must show that
we are worthy of liberty and of the great future which we are striving for</i>.
It must not be left to the generosity of individuals to support our peoples who
under oppressive conditions are awakening national consciousness in their
countrymen. <i>We must mobilise our whole nation</i>. All of us will be
required to assist in the great tasks which are awaiting us.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"I think we may confidently look into the future. The
war has united us internally, and it has taught us that all party politics
which for a long time past have poisoned our life, are insignificant in view of
the great issues of our national future which are at stake. We have lived long
enough to see our whole people united in the demand for an independent Czecho-Slovak
State, although the modern times have deepened class differences.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We recollect our past to-day with a firm hope for a
better future. The hearts of all are to-day filled with joyous confidence and
expectation that we shall live to see the day when in our National Theatre we
shall rejoice over the victory of liberty, justice and self-determination of
nations. <i>Our golden Slav </i><i>Prague</i><i> will again become a royal
city, and our Czech nation will again be free, strong and glorious</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>After Dr. Kramář had finished, the aged Czech author
Jirásek described the history of the National Theatre during the past fifty
years, and concluded:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"To-day as fifty years ago our nation is united
without party distinction. <i>We form a single front, and follow a single
policy. We all demand our natural and historic rights, and strengthened by the
co-operation of the Yugoslavs, we firmly believe that as we succeeded in
erecting our National Theatre, so shall we also obtain our rights and be able
to rejoice with a song of a full and free life</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>When the enthusiasm which followed Jirásek's speech
subsided, the great Slovak poet Hviezdoslav "conveyed the greeting from
that branch of the Czecho-Slovak nation which lives in Hungary," and
assured the assembly that after going back he would spread everywhere the news
of the enthusiasm animating the Czechs so as to cheer up his sorely suffering
fellow-countrymen, the Slovaks of Hungary.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Professor Kasprovicz from Lemberg, who followed, declared in
the name of the Poles:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We are united with you not only by blood affinity,
but by our united will, and we can reach the goal only by co-operation and by
joint efforts.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"This co-operation is perplexing to our enemies who,
therefore, do all in their power to disrupt this union. Their endeavours are in
vain. <i>All of us believe that neither the Czech nor the Polish nation will
perish</i>, that even a great war cannot bring about their extirpation; that
besides the war there is something greater than all human efforts, that the day
of justice will also come, and that the <i>Czech and Polish nations not only
must be but already are victorious</i>."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>A tremendous applause ensued, and the people sang
"Jeszcie Polska niezgynela" ("Poland has not perished
yet"). And when the chairman announced that the next speaker was to be the
Italian Irredentist deputy, Signer Conci, another storm of applause and cries
of "Eviva!" burst out. Signor Conci declared:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"I convey to you the expression of the heartiest
greetings from all Italians who are participating in this brilliant
manifestation, and from all those who, like myself, follow with great sympathy
everything that concerns the fate of the noble Czech nation.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"An old verse speaks about 'Socii dolorum' ('Friends
in suffering'), and I must say that this consolation for the different nations
of this state has been amply provided for. <i>But nothing helps the union and
brotherhood better than the common misfortune and common persecutions</i> which
strengthen the character of the nation. In defence against this menace, we and
you have written on our shield: 'Fanger, non flector' ('I can be broken but not
bent').</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"When I saw with what indomitable firmness you
withstood all unjust persecutions, and with what a fervent devotion and
enthusiasm the whole nation supported your best and unjustly persecuted
leaders, I realised that <i>this nation cannot die</i>, and that when the time
comes its just cause will triumph. And I bring you our sincere wish that this
may be as soon as possible. <i>It is a wish from one oppressed nation to
another</i>, from a representative of an afflicted nation which has suffered
and still is suffering intolerable oppression. May the roaring Bohemian lion
soon be able to repose in peace and fully enjoy his own triumph."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Dr. Tavčar, representing the Slovenes, declared:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We Yugoslavs are deeply feeling how much the Czech
culture is helping us and how great is its influence upon us. <i>We are the
most faithful allies of our brother Czechs</i>, and at the same time their
assiduous and I dare say very gifted pupils. At a moment when our oppressors
want to build a German bridge over our bodies to the Slav Adriatic, we come to
you as your allies. We shall fall if you fall, but our victory is
certain."</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Two other Yugoslav leaders, Dr. Srpulje, Mayor of Zagreb,
for the Croats, and V. Šola, President of the Bosnian Sabor, for the
Serbs, expressed the same sentiments.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>After the speech of the Czech author Krejčí, M.
Staněk, President of the Bohemian Parliamentary Union, concluded the
meeting.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Stormy demonstrations then took place in the streets of Prague,
where the people loudly cheered Professor Masaryk and the Entente.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On the same day also the Socialists had a meeting in which
prominent Czech, Polish and Yugoslav Socialists took part.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Polish Socialist deputy Moraczewski, from Cracow,
declared that "the Poles, like the Czechs, are fighting for
self-determination of nations." Comrade Kristan, speaking for the Slovene
workers, emphasised the idea of Yugoslav unity. The spokesman of the Social
Democrats from Bosnia, comrade Smitran, hailed the Czecho-Yugoslav
understanding, and said that, although living under intolerable conditions, his
nation hopes for deliverance, and like the Czecho-Slovak nation, demands
liberty and independence. After the Polish comrade Stanczyk, the leaders of the
two Czech Socialist parties, Dr. Soukup and Klofáč, delivered long
speeches in which they emphasised the solidarity of the three Western Slav
nations, the Poles, Czecho-Slovaks and Yugoslavs, and their identical claims
for liberty and independence. Dr. Soukup declared that "Socialism is
to-day a great factor not only in Bohemia, but in the whole world." The
manifestation was concluded by the Czech Socialist deputy Němec, and by
the singing of the Czech national anthem.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On the day following, fresh manifestations were held in Prague,
and a meeting was arranged, described by the Czech press as the Congress of
Oppressed Nations of Austria-Hungary. Among those who supported the resolutions
were representatives of Czecho-Slovaks, Yugoslavs, Rumanians and Italians, as
well as Poles. The resolution carried unanimously by the assembly reads as
follows:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The representatives of Slav and Latin nations who for
centuries past have been suffering under foreign oppression, assembled in
Prague this seventeenth day of May, 1918, have united in a common desire to do
all in their power in order to assure full liberty and independence to their
respective nations after this terrible war. They are agreed that a better
future for their nations will be founded and assured by the world democracy, by
a real and sovereign national people's government, and by a universal League of
Nations, endowed with the necessary authorities.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"They reject emphatically all steps of the government
taken without the consent of the people. They are convinced that the peace
which they, together with all other democratic parties and nations, are
striving for, will only be a just and lasting peace if it liberates the world
from the predominance of one nation over another and thus enables all nations
to defend themselves against aggressive imperialism by means of liberty and
equality of nations. All nations represented are determined to help each other,
since the victory of one is also the victory of the other, and is not only in
the interests of the nations concerned, but in the interests of civilisation,
of fraternity and equality of nations, as well as of true humanity."</p>
<p class=Chapter><a name=Bulwark>IX</a></p>
<p class=ChapterDescription>BOHEMIA AS A BULWARK AGAINST PAN-GERMANISM</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>From the foregoing chapters it is clear that:</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>(a)</i> The Austro-Hungarian Government represents only
the Habsburgs, and the Austrian Germans and the Magyars, who form a minority of
the total population of the monarchy. The majority, consisting of Slavs and
Latins, is opposed to the further existence of Austria-Hungary.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>(b)</i> The Austrian Germans and Magyars, who exercised
their hegemony in Austria and Hungary respectively, will always be bound to
look to Germany for the support of their predominance as long as Austria-Hungary
in whatever form exists. The collapse of the Habsburg Empire in October, 1918,
practically put an end to this possibility.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>(c)</i> The Habsburgs, Austro-Germans and Magyars, just
like the Bulgars, became the willing and wilful partners of Prussia in this
war, while the Austrian Slavs, especially the Czecho-Slovaks, have done all in
their power to assist the Allies at the price of tremendous sacrifices. Under
these circumstances, the only possible policy for the Allies is to support the
claims of those peoples who are heart and soul with them. Any policy which
would not satisfy the just Slav aspirations would play into the hands of Germany.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>(d)</i> The restoration of the <i>status quo ante bellum</i>
of Austria or Hungary is out of the question. The Allies have pledged
themselves to unite the Italian and Rumanian territories of Austria with Italy
and Rumania respectively. The aim of Serbia is to unite all the Yugoslavs.
Deprived of her Italian, Rumanian and Yugoslav provinces, Austria-Hungary would
lose some twelve million Slavs and Latins. The problem of Poland also cannot be
solved in a satisfactory way without the incorporation in Poland of the Polish
territories of Galicia. If the <i>status quo</i> were re-established, the
Czecho-Slovaks, whom Great Britain has recognised as an Allied nation, would be
placed in a decisive minority and would be powerless in face of the
German-Magyar majority. This the Allies in their own interests cannot allow.
They must insist upon the restoration of Bohemia's full independence.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>(e)</i> The disappearance of Austria-Hungary therefore
appears to be the only solution if a permanent peace in Europe is to be
achieved. Moreover, as we have already pointed out, her dissolution is a political
necessity for Europe, and is to-day already an accomplished fact.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The dismemberment of Austria does not mean a destructive
policy. On the contrary, it means only the destruction of oppression and racial
tyranny. It is fundamentally different from the dismemberment of Poland, which
was a living nation, while Austria is not. The dismemberment of Austria will,
on the contrary, unite nations at present dismembered, and will reconstruct
Europe so as to prevent further German aggressive attempts towards the East and
South-East. A close alliance between Poland, Czecho-Slovak Bohemia, Greater
Rumania, Greater Serbia (or Yugoslavia) and Italy would assure a stable peace
in Central Europe.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The issue really at stake was: Central Europe either
Pan-German or anti-German. If Germany succeeded in preserving Austria-Hungary,
the Pan-German plans of Mitteleuropa would be a <i>fait accompli</i>, and Germany
would have won the war: the Germans would, with the aid of the Magyars and
Bulgars, directly and indirectly control and exploit over one hundred million
Slavs in Central Europe. On the other hand, now that Austria has fallen to
pieces the German plans have been frustrated. The Germans will not only be
unable to use the Austrian Slavs again as cannon-fodder, but even the economic
exploitation of Central Europe will be barred to them.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>From the international point of view, Bohemia will form the
very centre of the anti-German barrier, and with the assistance of a new Poland
in the north, and Italy, Yugoslavia and Rumania in the south, she will
successfully prevent German penetration to the East, Near East and the Adriatic.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Austria and Hungary, reduced to their proper racial
boundaries, will be states of about eight million each. The Magyars, being
situated in the Lowlands, which are mainly agricultural, hemmed in between Bohemia,
Rumania and Yugoslavia, will be in a hopeless strategic and economic
position. They will be unable to attack any of their neighbours, and they will
be wholly dependent on them for industrial products. Hungary will thus be
forced to come to an understanding with her neighbours. Austria will be in a
similar position: deprived of her richest provinces, she will no longer be of
any great economic or military value to Germany.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Let us now examine the probable future relations between Bohemia
and her neighbours.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>1. The formation of a strong <i>Polish-Czech block</i> is
the only means of arresting the German expansion towards the East. To-day, when
Russia has collapsed, the liberation of the non-Germans of Central Europe can
alone save Europe from the hegemony of the German Herrenvolk. The creation of a
strong and united Poland with access to the sea at Gdansk (Dantzig) and an
independent Czecho-Slovak State has become a necessity for Europe.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The understanding between the Poles and Czechs is of vital
interest to both peoples concerned, and to Europe as a whole. It is by no means
hypothetical, considering that geographically the Poles and Czechs are
neighbours, that they speak almost the same language, and that their national
spirit, history and traditions bear a close resemblance. The history of Poland
offers many strange parallels to that of Bohemia. It is specially interesting
to note that in the fifteenth century, as to-day, the Poles and Czechs together
resisted the German "Drang nach Osten." The Czech with their famous
leader Zižka participated in the splendid Polish victory over the Teutonic
knights at Grünwald in 1410, while on the other hand, there were many Poles in
the Hussite regiments who so gloriously defended the Czech religious and
national liberties in the fifteenth century. Poland and Bohemia were also
united several times under a common dynasty.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>After Bohemia lost her independence at the battle of the White
Mountain in 1620, she became the prey of Austrian barbarity. The Habsburgs
have done their best to extirpate the Czech heretics and abolish and destroy
the Bohemian Constitution. With Bohemia's loss of independence her contact with
Poland also ceased. And Poland herself became the prey of Prussia, Russia and
Austria some 170 years later, notwithstanding the constitution of May 3 and
the heroic resistance of Kosciuszko.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The regeneration of the Czechs at the end of the eighteenth
century meant the resumption of friendly relations between Czechs and Poles.
The Czechs desired to come to an agreement with the Poles because the latter
are their nearest kinsmen in race and language, and like themselves have
suffered terribly from alien oppression. There were many Polonophils amongst
the first Czech regenerators, and the Polish revolutions always evoked sincere
sympathy in Bohemia. The modern Czech writers were all sincere friends of the
Poles. Thanks to their efforts, Sienkiewicz and Mickiewicz are read in every
household in Bohemia, and the dramas of Slowacki, Krasinski, Wyspianski and
others are frequently played on the stage of our National Theatre in Prague.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The present interests and aspirations of Poles and Czechs
are identical. Like the Czechs, the Poles are threatened by the Pan-German
schemes of Mitteleuropa and "Drang nach Osten," to which they are
bitterly opposed. These plans can be checked effectively only by the
establishment of a strong and united Poland with access to the sea, a strong
Czecho-Slovak State, and a united and independent Yugoslavia and Rumania.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>It was proved by events that Russian imperialism and
oppression was never so dangerous to Europe as Pan-Germanism, since the former
was built upon sand and opposed by the Russian people themselves; while
Pan-Germanism rests upon effective organisation, and its brutal principles of
domination are supported by the bulk of the German people. The Central Powers
are to-day Poland's only enemies, and are a danger to her as to all Europe. Poland's
interests lie only in one orientation: in absolute opposition to Pan-Germany.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The alliance between Poland and Bohemia will provide the
latter with an outlet to the sea (Gdansk). This will draw the two countries
still closer together. Economically such an alliance would be to the mutual
interests of both countries. Since Bohemia has not, like Poland, been
devastated during this war, she could greatly assist Poland in rebuilding her
trade and industries, and this would prevent German economic penetration to the
East. On the other hand, Poland could supply her with oil and salt from Galicia.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czecho-Polish block would prevent German penetration in Russia,
which would thus be able to set her own affairs in order. The Czecho-Polish
block would also frustrate the German plans of creating a Polish-German-Magyar
combination by means of a small Poland, completely dependent on the Central
Powers, or by means of the so-called Austro-Polish solution. The
Czecho-Slovaks, owing to their geographic position and past traditions, and
owing to their advanced civilisation, may be fully relied upon as the pioneers
of peace and stability in Central Europe.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>2. The Czecho-Slovak State will probably have a common
frontier with <i>Rumania</i>. The Rumanians-and Czecho-Slovaks will have common
interests, and their mutual political and economic relations will be of great
importance. Economically, agricultural Rumania and industrial Bohemia will
complete each other. Prague will have direct railway connection with Bukarest
and Jassy, while the Danube will connect the Czecho-Slovaks both with the
Yugoslavs and the Rumanians, under the protection of the League of Nations.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Politically the alliance between a united Poland, Bohemia
and Greater Rumania is of paramount importance, because if Poland and Rumania
remain as small as they are at present, and if the Czecho-Slovaks and Yugoslavs
are left at the mercy of Vienna and Budapest, the Germans will be masters of Central
Europe.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>3. The relations between <i>Czechs and Yugoslavs</i> have
always been cordial, since both of them have always had the same anti-German
and anti-Magyar orientation. By way of the Danube the Czecho-Slovaks would be
in direct communication with Belgrade. The Czechs could further also be
accorded an international railway connecting Pressburg with the Adriatic. The
Czechs, being well developed industrially and commercially, could greatly
assist the Yugoslavs in organising a state sufficiently strong to arrest German
and Magyar penetration in the Balkans.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czechs, being good friends of the Yugoslavs and
Italians, will at the same time exert their efforts to prevent all
misunderstandings between these two Adriatic nations from which only the
Germans would profit. A close alliance between Bohemia, Italy, Yugoslavia and Rumania
will form an effective safeguard against German penetration in the Near East.
Since Rumania will border both on Bohemia and Yugoslavia, the Germans will be
completely encircled by a strong Latin-Slav barrier, of which Bohemia will form
the centre, working for stability in Central Europe and safeguarding Europe
from a repetition of the German attempts at world domination.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>4. The Czecho-Slovak State itself will be strong both
strategically and economically. It will number over twelve million, and its
territory, comprising Bohemia, Moravia, Austrian-Silesia and Slovakia, will be
about 50,000 square miles, that is a territory as large as England (without
Scotland, Ireland and Wales).</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Surrounded by high mountains, Bohemia forms a veritable
fortress in the heart of Europe. Economically, too, she will be strong and
self-supporting.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In the past Bohemia was the richest part of the Habsburg
Empire, with well-developed agriculture and industries. Bohemia produced 829
lbs. of grain per inhabitant, the rest of Austria 277 lbs. The Bohemian lands
are responsible for 93 per cent. of Austria's, production of sugar, most of
which has been exported to England. Hops of remarkable quality are produced in Bohemia,
and Pilsen beer is known all over the world. Bohemia manufactures over 50 per
cent. of all the beer produced in Austria. Bohemia has also abundant wealth in
minerals, the only mineral which is not found there being salt. Bohemia
produces 60 per cent. of Austria's iron and 83 per cent. (26 million tons) of
her coal. As regards trade, almost all the business between Bohemia and Western
Europe has always passed through Vienna, which of course greatly profited
thereby. This will cease when Bohemia becomes independent.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Two-thirds of the total Austrian exports, the value of which
was over £63,000,000 in 1912, come from the Bohemian lands. To England alone Austria
exported £9,000,000 worth of Bohemian sugar annually. Bohemian beer, malt and
hops were exported especially to France, textiles and machines to Italy. On the
other hand, Germany and German-Austria imported from the Bohemian lands
especially agricultural products (butter, eggs, cheese, cereals, fruit), also
coal and wood manufactures.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In 1905 Austria exported 425,000 metric tons of wheat and
186,000 metric tons of malt, which were mostly produced in Bohemia. The export
of Bohemian beer brings Austria 15,000,000 kronen annually (£625,000), of malt
55,000,000 kronen (£2,290,000). The Bohemian lands further export 130,000,000
kronen (£5,430,000) worth of textiles annually.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Austrian import trade is also largely dependent on Bohemia.
All French articles bought by Bohemia come through Vienna, two-thirds of the
whole French export being destined for that country.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>As regards England, in 1914 £2,676,000 worth of goods were
exported to Austria-Hungary, the greater part of which again was destined for Bohemia,
the chief articles being printing and agricultural machines and textile
manufactures. England will after the war find a good market in Bohemia, and
valuable assistants in Czech banks and business men in the economic competition
against the Germans in the Near East, since the Czechs boycotted German goods
even before the war. Prague is a railway centre of European importance, being
situated just midway between the Adriatic and the Baltic Sea. An agreement with
her neighbours (Poland, Yugoslavia and Rumania) and the League of Nations
arrangement would secure her an outlet to the sea by means of international
railways, while the Elbe and Danube would also form important trade routes. Bohemia
would become an intermediary between the Baltic and Adriatic as well as between
East and West.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Also the future relations of Bohemia with the British
colonies are not without importance. More than half the trade of Austria with
the British colonies was transacted by the Czechs, and Austria-Hungary exported
to British colonies £3,500,000 and imported from them £10,500,000 worth of
goods annually.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>5. One of the most important reasons why the Czecho-Slovaks,
when independent, will be able to render such valuable services to the Allies,
is the high degree of their civilisation. Despite all efforts of the Austrian
Government to the contrary, the Czechs have nevertheless been able to attain a
high standard of education, and they also excel in literature, music and the
arts.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czechs are not only the most advanced of all Slavs, but
they are even the most advanced of all nations of Austria-Hungary. In Austria
as a whole 6.7 per cent. of the children do not attend school; in Bohemia only
1-1/2 per cent. The standard of education of the Czechs compares with that of
the Austrian-Germans and Magyars, according to the <i>Monatschrift für
Statistik</i> of 1913, as follows:</p>
<p class=TablePlainText style='margin-top:12.0pt'>
Czechs. Austrian Magyars.</p>
<p class=TablePlainText> Germans.</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>Persons knowing how to write</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>and read 95-1/2%
92% 40%</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>Persons knowing how to read</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>only 3%
1% 4%</p>
<p class=TablePlainText>Illiterates 1-1/2%
7% 56%</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Czechs have accomplished this by their own efforts, as
is shown by the fact that 151 Czech schools are kept up by a private Czech
society. These 151 schools have altogether 287 classes and 522 teachers, and
are attended by more than 15,000 children. The unjust treatment of the Czechs
in regard to schools is further shown by the fact that 9,000,000 Germans in Austria
had five universities, 5,000,000 Poles two universities, while 7,000,000 Czechs
had only one. The German University in Prague had 878 students in 1912, the Czech
University 4713. The Germans in Prague number some 10,000 (<i>i.e.</i> 1-1/2
per cent.), yet they have their public schools and even a university; while the
Czechs in Vienna, numbering at least some 300,000 (<i>i.e.</i> over 15 per
cent.), are deprived even of elementary schools, to say nothing of secondary
schools and universities.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The Slovaks of Hungary were, of course, in an absolutely
hopeless position in view of the terrible system of Magyar oppression. The
Magyars consider the schools as the most effective means for magyarisation. In
the 16 counties inhabited by the Slovaks there are only 240 Slovak schools, and
even in those schools Magyar is taught sometimes fully 18 hours a week. The
number of Slovak schools has been systematically reduced from 1921 in 1869 to
440 in 1911, and 240 in 1912, and these are attended by some 18,000 children
out of 246,000, <i>i.e.</i> 8 per cent. The Slovaks opened three secondary
schools in the early seventies, but all three were arbitrarily closed in 1874.
They have, of course, no university. Thus they were deprived of intellectual
leaders and are doomed to complete denationalisation, unless liberated and
united with the Czechs in an independent Bohemia.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In literature the Czechs may rightly range themselves side
by side with the great nations of Western Europe. Practically all the most
important works of foreign literature have been translated into Czech. The
Czechs have many good dramas, novels, and much excellent poetry which can be
fully appreciated only by those knowing their language. They are also very
musical, and their composers such as Dvořák, Smetana, Novák or Suk,
singers such as Emmy Destinn, and violinists such as Kubelík, are known all
over the world. They are also developed in all other arts, and their
folk-songs, peasant arts and industries, especially those of the Slovaks, bear
ample testimony to their natural talents and sense for beauty and art.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>6. It is obvious that the cause of Bohemia is of very great
importance to the very existence of the British Empire. If Germany succeeded in
preserving her grip on Austria-Hungary, the Balkans and Turkey, she would soon
strike at Egypt and India, and thus endanger the safety of the British Empire. Germany
would control vast resources in man-power and material which would enable her
to plunge into another attempt at world-domination in a very short time. On the
other hand, when the non-German nations of Central Europe are liberated, Germany
will be absolutely prevented from repeating her present exploits, Great Britain
will be no more menaced by her, and a permanent peace in Europe will be
assured. Thus with the cause of Bohemia the cause of Great Britain will either
triumph or fall. Bismarck truly said that the master of Bohemia would be the
master of Europe.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Bohemia has many traditions in common with England, and she
will become her natural ally and friend. In the Czecho-Slovaks, the most
democratic, homogeneous and advanced nation of Central Europe, Great Britain
will find a true ally and fellow-pioneer in the cause of justice, freedom and
democracy.</p>
<p class=Chapter><a name=Appendix>APPENDIX OF SOME RECENT DOCUMENTS</a></p>
<p class=Section>THE CZECHO-SLOVAK RESOLUTION OF SEPTEMBER 29, 1918</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The following is the text of the resolution passed by the
Czecho-Slovak National Council in Prague, in conjunction with the Union of
Czech Deputies, on September 29, 1918, and suppressed by the Austrian censor:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Our nation once more and with all possible emphasis
lays stress on the fact that it firmly and unswervedly stands by the historical
manifestations of its freely elected representatives, firmly convinced of the
ultimate success of its highest ideals of full independence and liberty. <i>Our
silenced and oppressed nation has no other answer to all attempts at a change
of the constitution than a cool and categorical refusal</i>, because we know
that these attempts are nothing except products of an ever-increasing strain,
helplessness and ruin. <i>We do not believe to-day in any more promises given
and not kept</i>, for experience has taught us to judge them on their merits.
The most far-reaching promises cannot blind us and turn us away from our aims.
The hard experiences of our nation order us imperatively to hold firm in
matters where reality is stronger than all promises. <i>The </i><i>Vienna</i><i>
Government is unable to give us anything we ask for</i>. Our nation can never
expect to get its liberty from those who at all times regarded it only as a
subject of ruthless exploitations; and who even in the last moment do not
shrink from any means to humiliate, starve and wipe out our nation and by cruel
oppression to hurt us in our most sacred feelings. <i>Our nation has nothing in
common with those who are responsible for the horrors of this war</i>.
Therefore there will not be a single person who would, contrary to the
unanimous wish of the nation, deal with those who have not justice for the
Czech nation at heart and who have also no sympathy with the Polish and
Yugoslav nations, but who are only striving for the salvation of their present
privileged position of misrule and injustice. <i>The Czech nation will follow
its anti-German policy, whatever may happen, assured that its just cause will
finally triumph, especially to-day when it becomes a part of the great ideals
of the Entente, whose victory will be the only good produced by this terrible
war</i>."</p>
<p class=Section>CZECH LEADERS REFER THE AUSTRIAN GOVERNMENT TO THE
CZECHO-SLOVAK GOVERNMENT AS THEIR AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVES</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Speaking in the Reichsrat, deputy Staněk declared in
the name of the Union of Czech Deputies on October 2, 1918:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"This terrible war, started against the will and
despite the warnings of the Czecho-Slovaks, has now reached the culminating
point. Two worlds have been struggling in this war. One of them stood for the Middle
Ages and has with daring impudence inscribed upon its banner 'Might is Right.'
Inspired by this watchword, the spirit of German Imperialism believed it had a
mission to rule the whole world, and it was voluntarily joined by the rulers of
Austria-Hungary in the mad desire of enslaving the whole world.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"It was not difficult to guess which side would win
unless civilisation were to be thrown back for centuries. On one side stood the
mediaeval spirit of autocracy; on the other, pure love of liberty and
democracy. And we who have been oppressed by Austria for centuries and who have
tasted Austrian 'education' have naturally not formed voluntary legions on the
side of Austria. In fact <i>the Czecho-Slovaks have not voluntarily shed a
single drop of blood for the Central Powers</i>. But our compatriots abroad,
remembering the centuries-old Austrian oppression, have <i>formed voluntary
legions in all the Allied armies</i>. They are shedding their blood for the
most sacred rights of humanity and at a moment of the greatest danger for the
Allies they saved the situation. In Russia, too, they are fighting for
democracy. Nobody will succeed in arresting the triumphant progress of true
democracy, not even the Austrian and German Governments, nor any diplomacy, nor
any peace notes or crown councils. The world will not be deceived again and
nobody takes the Central Powers and their governments seriously any more.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Your peace offensives will avail nothing to you,
nobody will speak with you again. <i>Even the Austrian peoples refuse to
negotiate with you, knowing the value of your words. We have no intention of
saving you from destruction</i>. Your aim is still the German-Magyar hegemony
and the oppression of Slavs and Latins. You must look elsewhere for support.
The fateful hour for you and the Magyars has come sooner than we expected.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"And the dynasty? Look at the electoral reform in Hungary
sanctioned by the emperor! This reform is intended to destroy completely the
political and national existence of the non-Magyars in Hungary. This is how the
emperor keeps his word.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"In view of these events we must ask ourselves: Are
there any moral guarantees in this empire? We do not see them and therefore we
declare that we <i>reject all community with the political system of this
empire. We want a single front of three Slav States extending from </i><i>Gdansk</i><i>
(Dantzig) via </i><i>Prague</i><i> to the </i><i>Adriatic</i><i>.</i> We
protest against any partial solution of the Czecho-Slovak question. The Czecho-Slovak
State which must also include the Slovaks of Hungary is our minimum programme.
We again emphasise our solidarity with our Yugoslav brethren, whether they live
in Belgrade, Sarajevo, Mostar or Lubljana, and we ask for the removal of those
statesmen who wish to subjugate the remainder of the Bosnian population. <i>A
free Yugoslavia, an independent Greater Poland and the Czecho-Slovak State</i>
are already in process of formation, closely allied to each other, not only by
the knowledge of common economic interests, but also on the ground of the moral
prerogatives of international right.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Peace is in sight. We wanted to be admitted to peace
negotiations with representatives of other nations. The Germans refused and
replied: 'If you insist you will be hanged.' Of course the Germans never kept
their word except when they promised to hang some one! But the Entente replied
by deeds recognising the Czecho-Slovak army as an Allied and belligerent army.
Thereupon <i>the Austrian Government asked us, Czech leaders in </i><i>Austria</i><i>,
to protest against it. But of course we refused.</i> I said so openly to the
Premier, and if you like, I will tell it to the Austrian Emperor himself. <i>You
would not admit us to the peace negotiations with </i><i>Russia</i><i>, and now
you will have to negotiate with Czech leaders after all</i>, whether you like
it or not. <i>These leaders will be representatives of the same Czecho-Slovak
brigades which Count Hertling called rascals</i> ('<i>Gesindel</i>'). <i>You
will have to negotiate with them, and not with us</i>, and therefore we will
not speak with you. Our question will not be solved in Vienna. If you accept
President Wilson's terms, if the German people, and not the German bureaucrats,
accept them, then you can have peace at once and save humanity from further
bloodshed. There is no other way out, and <i>we therefore advise you honestly
and frankly to surrender to the Allies unconditionally</i>, because in the end
nothing else will be left to you.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"In agreement with the whole Yugoslav nation, in
agreement with Polish representatives, voicing the will of the Polish people,
the Czecho-Slovaks declare before the whole world:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>'Forward in our struggle for liberty and for a new life in
our own liberated, restored state!'"</p>
<p class=Section>PRESIDENT WILSON'S REPLY TO THE AUSTRIAN PEACE OFFER</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>In reply to the Austro-Hungarian proposal for an armistice
of October 7, 1918, Mr. Robert Lansing addressed the following communication
from President Wilson to the Austrian Government through the medium of the
Swedish Legation in Washington on October 18, 1918:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The President deems it his duty to say to the
Austro-Hungarian Government that he cannot entertain the present suggestion of
that government because of certain events of the utmost importance which,
occurring since the delivery of his address of January 8 last, have necessarily
altered the attitude and responsibility of the Government of the United States.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Among the fourteen terms of peace which the President
formulated at that time occurred the following:</p>
<p class=BlockQuoteLevel2>"'The peoples of Austria-Hungary, whose place
among the nations we wish to see safeguarded and assured, should be accorded
the freest opportunity of autonomous development.'</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Since that sentence was written and uttered to the
Congress of the United States, the Government of the United States has
recognised that a state of belligerency exists between the Czecho-Slovaks and
the German and Austro-Hungarian Empires, and that the Czecho-Slovak National
Council is a <i>de facto</i> belligerent government, clothed with proper
authority to direct the military and political affairs of the Czecho-Slovaks.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"It has also recognised in the fullest manner the
justice of the nationalistic aspirations of the Yugo-Slavs for freedom.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The President therefore is no longer at liberty to
accept a mere 'autonomy' of these peoples as a basis of peace, but is obliged
to insist that they, and not he, shall be the judges of what action on the part
of the Austro-Hungarian Government will satisfy their aspirations and their
conception of their rights and destiny as members of the family of
nations."</p>
<p class=Section>THE CONSTITUTION OF THE CZECHO-SLOVAK PROVISIONAL GOVERNMENT</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>On October 14, Dr. E. Beneš addressed the following
letter to all the Allied Governments:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"By the declaration of the Government of the United
States of September 3, 1918, the Czecho-Slovak National Council, whose seat
is in Paris, has been recognised as a <i>de facto</i> Czecho-Slovak Government.
This recognition has been confirmed by the following Allied Governments: by
Great Britain in her agreement with the National Council of September 3, 1918;
by France in her agreement of September 28, 1918, and by Italy in the
declaration of her Premier on October 3,1918. I have the honour to inform you
that in view of these successive recognitions a Provisional Czecho-Slovak
Government has been constituted by the decision of September 26, 1918, with its
provisional seat in Paris and consisting of the following members:</p>
<p class=BlockQuoteLevel2>"<i>Professor Thomas G. Masaryk</i>, President
of the Provisional Government and of the Cabinet of Ministers, and Minister of
Finance.</p>
<p class=BlockQuoteLevel2>"<i>Dr. Edward Beneš</i>, Minister for
Foreign Affairs and of the Interior.</p>
<p class=BlockQuoteLevel2>"General Milan R. Štefanik, Minister of
War.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The undersigned ministry has subsequently decided to
accredit the following representatives with the Allied Powers:</p>
<p class=BlockQuoteLevel2>"<i>Dr. Stephan Osuský</i>. Chargé d'Affaires of
the Czecho-Slovak Legation in London, accredited with His Majesty's Government
in Great Britain.</p>
<p class=BlockQuoteLevel2>"<i>Dr. Leo Sychrava</i>, Chargé d'Affaires of
the Czecho-Slovak Legation in Paris, accredited with the French Government.</p>
<p class=BlockQuoteLevel2>"<i>Dr. Leo Borský</i>, Chargé d'Affaires of the
Czecho-Slovak Legation in Rome, accredited with the Royal Government of Italy.</p>
<p class=BlockQuoteLevel2>"<i>Dr. Charles Pergler</i>, Chargé d'Affaires
of the Czecho-Slovak Legation in Washington, accredited with the Government of
the United States.</p>
<p class=BlockQuoteLevel2>"<i>Bohdan Pavlu</i>, at present at Omsk, is to
represent our Government in Russia.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Our representatives in Japan and Serbia will be
appointed later.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We have the honour to inform you that we have taken
these decisions in agreement with the political leaders at home. During the
past three years our whole political and military action has been conducted in
complete agreement with them. Finally, on October 2, 1918, the Czecho-Slovak
deputy Staněk, President of the Union of Czech Deputies to the Parliament
in Vienna, solemnly announced that the Czecho-Slovak National Council in Paris
is to be considered as the supreme organ of the Czecho-Slovak armies and that
it is entitled to represent the Czecho-Slovak nation in the Allied countries
and at the Peace Conference. On October 9, his colleague, deputy Zahradník,
speaking in the name of the same union, declared that the Czecho-Slovaks are
definitely leaving the Parliament in Vienna, thereby breaking for ever all
their ties with Austria-Hungary.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Following the decision of our nation and of our
armies, we are henceforth taking charge as a Provisional National Government
for the direction of the political destinies of the Czecho-Slovak State, and as
such we are entering officially into relations with the Allied Governments,
relying both upon our mutual agreement with them and upon their solemn
declarations.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We make this declaration in a specially solemn manner
at a moment when great political events call upon all the nations to take part
in decisions which will perhaps give Europe a new political régime for
centuries to come.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Assuring you of my devoted sentiments, believe me to
remain, in the name of the Czecho-Slovak Government,</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>(Signed)</i> "DR. EDWARD BENEŠ,</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Minister for Foreign Affairs."</p>
<p class=Section>CZECHO-SLOVAK DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"At this grave moment when the Hohenzollerns are
offering peace in order to stop the victorious advance of the Allied armies and
to prevent the dismemberment of Austria-Hungary and Turkey, and when the
Habsburgs are promising the federalisation of the empire and autonomy to the
dissatisfied nationalities committed to their rule, we, the Czecho-Slovak
National Council, recognised by the Allied and American Governments as the
Provisional Government of the Czecho-Slovak State and nation, in complete
accord with the declaration of the Czech deputies in Prague on January 6, 1918,
and realising that federalisation and, still more, autonomy mean nothing under
a Habsburg dynasty, do hereby make and declare this our Declaration of
Independence:</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Because of our belief that no people should be forced
to live under a sovereignty they do not recognise and because of our knowledge
and firm conviction that our nation cannot freely develop in a Habsburg
confederation which is only a new form of the denationalising oppression which
we have suffered for the past three centuries, we consider freedom to be the
first pre-requisite for federalisation and believe that the free nations of
Central and Eastern Europe may easily federate should they find it necessary.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We make this declaration on the basis of our historic
and natural right: we have been an independent state since the seventh century,
and in 1526 as an independent state, consisting of Bohemia, Moravia and Silesia,
we joined with Austria and Hungary in a defensive union against the Turkish
danger. We have never voluntarily surrendered our rights as an independent
state in this confederation. The Habsburgs broke their compact with our nation
by illegally transgressing our rights and violating the constitution of our
state, which they had pledged themselves to uphold, and we therefore refuse any
longer to remain a part of Austria-Hungary in any form.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We claim the right of Bohemia to be reunited with her
Slovak brethren of Slovakia, which once formed part of our national state, but
later was torn from our national body and fifty years ago was incorporated in
the Hungarian State of the Magyars, who by their unspeakable violence and
ruthless oppression of their subject races have lost all moral and human right
to rule anybody but themselves.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The world knows the history of our struggle against
the Habsburg oppression, intensified and systematised by the Austro-Hungarian
dualistic compromise of 1867. This dualism is only a shameless organisation of
brute force and exploitation of the majority by the minority. It is a political
conspiracy of the Germans and Magyars against our own as well as the other Slav
and Latin nations of the monarchy.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"The world knows the justice of our claims, which the
Habsburgs themselves dare not deny. Francis Joseph in the most solemn manner
repeatedly recognised the sovereign rights of our nation. The Germans and
Magyars opposed this recognition, and Austria-Hungary, bowing before the
Pan-Germans, became a colony of Germany and as her vanguard to the East
provoked the last Balkan conflict as well as the present world war, which was
begun by the Habsburgs alone without the consent of the representatives of the
people.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We cannot and will not continue to live under the
direct or indirect rule of the violators of Belgium, France and Serbia, the
would-be murderers of Russia and Rumania, the murderers of tens of thousands of
civilians and soldiers of our blood, and the accomplices in numberless
unspeakable crimes committed in this war against humanity by the two degenerate
and irresponsible dynasties of Habsburgs and Hohenzollerns. We will not remain
a part of a state which has no justification for existence and which, refusing
to accept the fundamental principles of modern world organisation, remains only
an artificial and immoral political structure, hindering every movement towards
democratic and social progress. The Habsburg dynasty, weighed down by a huge
inheritance of error and crime, is a perpetual menace to the peace of the
world, and we deem it our duty towards humanity and civilisation to aid in
bringing about its downfall and destruction.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We reject the sacrilegious assertion that the power
of the Habsburg and Hohenzollern dynasties is of divine origin. We refuse to
recognise the divine right of kings. Our nation elected the Habsburgs to the
throne of Bohemia of its own free will and by the same right deposes them. We
hereby declare the Habsburg dynasty unworthy of leading our nation and deny all
their claims to rule in the Czecho-Slovak land, which we here and now declare
shall henceforth be a free and independent people and nation.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We accept and shall adhere to the ideals of modern
democracy as they have been ideals of our nation for centuries. We accept the
American principles as laid down by President Wilson, the principles of
liberated mankind of the actual equality of nations and of governments,
deriving all their just power from the consent of the governed. We, the nation
of Comenius, cannot but accept those principles expressed in the American
Declaration of Independence, the principles of Lincoln and of the Declaration
of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. For these principles our nation shed
its blood in the memorable Hussite wars five hundred years ago. For these same
principles beside her Allies our nation is shedding its blood to-day in Russia,
Italy and France.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"We shall outline only the main principles of the
constitution of the Czecho-Slovak nation. The final decision as to the
constitution itself falls to the legally chosen representatives of the
liberated and united people. The Czecho-Slovak State shall be a republic in
constant endeavour for progress. It will guarantee complete freedom of
conscience, religion and science, literature and art, speech, the press and the
right of assembly and petition. The Church shall be separated from the State. Our
democracy shall rest on universal suffrage; women shall be placed on an equal
footing with men politically, socially and culturally, while the right of the
minority shall be safeguarded by proportional representation. National
minorities shall enjoy equal rights. The government shall be parliamentary in
form and shall recognise the principles of initiative and referendum. The
standing army will be replaced by militia. The Czecho-Slovak nation will carry
out far-reaching social and economic reforms. The large estates will be
redeemed for home colonisation, and patents of nobility will be abolished. Our
nation will assume responsibility for its part of the Austro-Hungarian pre-war
public debt. The debts for this war we leave to those who incurred them.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"In its foreign policy the Czecho-Slovak nation will
accept its full share of responsibility in the reorganisation of Eastern Europe.
It accepts fully the democratic and social principle of nationality and
subscribes to the doctrine that all covenants and treaties shall be entered
into openly and frankly without secret diplomacy. Our constitution shall
provide an efficient, national and just government which will exclude all
special privileges and prohibit class legislation.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Democracy has defeated theocratic autocracy,
militarism is overcome, democracy is victorious. On the basis of democracy
mankind will be reorganised. The forces of darkness have served the victory of light,
the longed-for age of humanity is dawning. We believe in democracy, we believe
in liberty and liberty for evermore.</p>
<p class=BlockQuote>"Given in Paris on the 18th October, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>(Signed)</i> "PROFESSOR THOMAS G. MASARYK,</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Prime Minister and Minister of Finance.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>GENERAL DR. MILAN ŠTEFANIK,</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Minister of National Defence.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>DR. EDWARD BENEŠ,</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Minister for Foreign Affairs and of the Interior."</p>
<p class=Chapter><a name=Bibliography>BIBLIOGRAPHY</a></p>
<p class=Section>PAN-GERMANISM</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>CHÉRADAME, A.: <i>The Pan-German Plot Unmasked</i>. John
Murray, London, 1916.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>NAUMANN, F.: <i>Central Europe</i>. King & Son, London,
1916.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>For complete survey of Pan-Germanism and Pan-German
literature, see Prof. Masaryk's articles in the first volume of the <i>New
Europe</i>, as well as various articles in <i>La Nation Tchèque</i>.</p>
<p class=Section>THE SLAVS</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>BAILEY, V.F.: <i>The Slavs of the War Zone</i>. Chapman
& Hall, London, 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>LEGER, Louis: <i>Etudes slaves</i>. <span lang=FR>Leroux,
Paris, 1875, </span>1880 and 1886<span lang=FR>.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>----<i>Le monde slave</i>. </span>Hachette,
Paris, 1910.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>MASARYK, T.G.: <i>The Slavs amongst Nations</i>. <span
lang=FR>London, 1915.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>NIEDERLE, L.: <i>La race slave</i>. Hachette,
Paris, 1910.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>TUČIĆ, S.: <i>The Slav Nations. Daily Telegraph</i>
War Books, London, 1914.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>See also <i>Le Monde Slave</i>, a monthly review published
in Paris by Prof. Ernest Denis at 19-21 rue Cassette.</p>
<p class=Section><span lang=FR>THE AUSTRIAN PROBLEM</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>BENEŠ, EDWARD: <i>Le problème autrichien
et la question tchèque</i>. Girard-Brière, Paris, 1908.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>----<i>Détruisez l'Autriche-Hongrie.</i> </span>Delagrave,
Paris, 1915.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>COLQUHOUN, A.R.: <i>The Whirlpool of </i><i>Europe</i>. <span
lang=FR>Harpers, London, 1907.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>CHÉRADAME, A.: <i>L'Europe et la question
d'Autriche-Hongrie</i>. </span>Paris, 1900.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>DRAGE, GEOFFREY: <i>Austria-Hungary</i><i>.</i> <span
lang=FR>John Murray, London, 1909.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>EISENMANN, L.: <i>Le compromis
austro-hongrois.</i> Paris, 1904.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>FOURNOL, E.: <i>Sur la succession de
l'Autriche-Hongrie.</i> </span>Paris, 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>GAYDA, V.: <i>Modern </i><i>Austria</i>. Fisher Unwin, London,
1914.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>GRIBBLE, F.J.: <i>The Emperor Francis Joseph</i>. <span
lang=FR>Eveleigh Nash, London, 1914.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>LEGER, Louis: <i>Histoire de
l'Autriche-Hongrie.</i> Hachette, Paris, 1888.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>----<i>La liquidation de l'Autriche-Hongrie.</i></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>MITTON, G.E.: <i>Austria-Hungary</i><i>.</i> A. & C.
Black, London, 1915.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>McCURDY, C.A., M.P.: <i>The Terms of the Coming Peace</i>. W.H.
Smith & Son, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>STEED, HENRY WICKHAM: <i>The Habsburg Monarchy</i>. Constable,
1914 and 1916.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>SETON-WATSON, R.W.: <i>The Future of </i><i>Austria-Hungary</i><i>.</i>
Constable, London, 1907.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>SETON-WATSON, R.W., and others: <i>War and Democracy.</i>
Macmillan & Co., 1914.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>TOYNBEE, A.: <i>Nationality and the War.</i> Dent &
Sons, London, 1915.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>The New </i><i>Europe</i><i>.</i> Dent & Sons.</p>
<p class=Section>HUNGARY AND THE SLOVAKS</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>ČAPEK, THOMAS: <i>The Slovaks of </i><i>Hungary</i><i>.</i>
Knickerbocker Press, New York, 1906.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>DENIS, ERNEST: <i>Les Slovaques.</i> Delagrave, Paris, 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>SCOTUS-VIATOR: <i>Racial Problems in </i><i>Hungary</i><i>.</i>
Constable, 1908.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>SETON-WATSON, R.W.: <i>German, Slav and Magyar.</i> <span
lang=FR>Williams & Norgate, London, 1916.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>BOHEMIAN HISTORY</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>DENIS, ERNEST: <i>Huss et la Guerre des
Hussites.</i> Leroux, Paris, 1878.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>----<i>Les origines de l'unité des frères
bohèmes.</i> Angers, Burdin, 1881.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>----<i>Fin de l'indépendance bohème.</i>
Colin, Paris, 1890.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>----<i>La Bohème depuis la Montagne Blanche.</i>
Leroux, Paris, 1903.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>FRICZ: <i>Table de l'histoire de la Bohème.</i></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>GINDELY, A.: <i>History of the Thirty Years' War.</i> Translation
from Czech. Putnam's Sons, New York, 1884.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>GREGOR, F.: <i>Story of </i><i>Bohemia</i><i>.</i> <span
lang=FR>Hunt & Eaton, New York, 1895.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>HANTICH, H.: <i>La révolution de</i> 1848 <i>en
Bohème.</i> Schneider, Lyon, 1910.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>----<i>Le droit historique de la Bohème.</i>
Chevalier, Paris, 1910.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>LEGER, LOUIS: <i>La renaissance tchèque en</i>
XIX<sup>e</sup> <i>siècle.</i> </span>Paris, 1911.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>LÜTZOW, COUNT FRANCIS: <i>Bohemia</i><i>.</i> A historical
sketch. Everyman's Library. Dent & Sons, London, 1907.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>The Story of </i><i>Prague</i><i>.</i> Dent &
Sons, London, 1902.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>Life and Times of John Hus.</i> Dent & Sons,
1909.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>MAURICE, C.E.: <i>The Story of </i><i>Bohemia</i><i>.</i>
Fisher Unwin, 1896.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>SCHWARZE, REV. J.: <i>John Hus.</i> The Revel Co., New York,
1915.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>SCHAFF, DAVID: <i>John Huss.</i> George Allen & Unwin, London,
1915.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>WRATISLAW, A.H.: <i>John Hus.</i> Young & Co., London,
1882.</p>
<p class=Section>BOHEMIAN LITERATURE</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>BOWRING, SIR JOHN: <i>Cheskian Anthology.</i> Rowland
Hunter, London, 1832.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>BAUDIŠ, PROF. JOSEPH: <i>Czech Folk Tales.</i> George
Allen & Unwin, London, 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>FRICZ: <i>L'idée nationale dans la poésie et
la tradition</i> bohème.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>GAMBERT, E.: <i>Poésie tchèque contemporaine.</i>
Paris, 1903.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>JELINEK, H.: <i>La littérature tchèque
contemporaine</i>. </span>Paris, 1912.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>KOMENSKY, J.A.: <i>Labyrinth of the World</i>. Translated
from Czech by Count Lützow. Dent & Sons, London, 1900.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>LÜTZOW, COUNT FRANCIS: <i>Bohemian Literature</i>.
Heinemann, London, 1907.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>MARCHANT, F.P.: <i>Outline of Bohemian Literature</i>. London,
1911.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>MORFILL, W.R.: <i>A Grammar of the Bohemian (Čech)
Language.</i> With translations from Bohemian literature. Clarendon Press, Oxford,
1899.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>Slavonic Literature</i>. London, 1883.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>NĚMCOVÁ, B.: <i>The Grandmother</i>. A novel translated
from Czech. McClurg, Chicago, 1892.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>SELVER, PAUL: <i>Anthology of Modern Bohemian Poetry.</i>
Drane, London, 1912.</p>
<p class=Section>BOHEMIAN CIVILISATION</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>BAKER, JAMES: <i>Pictures from </i><i>Bohemia</i>. Chapman
& Hall, London, 1904.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>HANTICH, H.: <i>La musique tchèque</i>. Nilsson, Paris,
1910.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>MONROE, W.S.: <i>Bohemia</i><i> and the Čechs</i>. Bell
& Sons, London, 1910.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>PROCHAZKA, J.: <i>Bohemia</i><i>'s Claim for Freedom</i>. Chatto
& Windus, London, 1915.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>TYRŠOVA, R., and HANTICH, H.: <i>Le paysan tchèque</i>.
Nilsson, Paris.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>ZMRHAL, J.J., and BENEŠ, V.: <i>Bohemia</i>. Bohemian
National Alliance, Chicago, 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>Les pays tchèques</i>, published by the Ligue
Franco-Tchèque, Paris, 1917.</p>
<p class=Section>BOHEMIAN POLITICS</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>BENEŠ, EDWARD: <i>Bohemia</i><i>'s Case for </i><i>Independence</i>.
<span lang=FR>George Allen & Unwin, London, 1917.</span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=FR>BOURLIER, JEAN: <i>Les Tchèques et la Bohème</i>.
</span>F. Alcan, Paris, 1897.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>ČAPEK, THOMAS: <i>Bohemia</i><i> under Habsburg Misrule</i>.
Chicago, 1915.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>For reference <i>re</i> the Czecho-Slovak movement, see its
official organ <i>La Nation Tchèque</i>, published at 18, rue Bonaparte, Paris.
First two volumes edited by E. Denis, the following by Dr. E. Beneš.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>Numerous useful articles on Bohemia and the Austrian problem
from the pen of H.W. Steed, R.W. Seton-Watson, L.B. Namier, Professor Masaryk,
Dr. Beneš, V. Nosek and others will be found in the weekly review of
foreign politics, the <i>New Europe</i>, published by Messrs. Constable &
Co., 10, Orange Street, London, W.C.2.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>The following list of some recent articles in the English
(not American) monthly and quarterly reviews is also recommended:</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>BARRY, The Very Rev. Canon WILLIAM: <i>Break </i><i>Austria</i><i>.
Nineteenth Century</i>, September, 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>How to Break </i><i>Austria</i><i>. Nineteenth
Century</i>, November, 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>Shall </i><i>England</i><i> save </i><i>Austria</i><i>?
Nineteenth Century</i>, June, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>CHÉRADAME, A.: <i>How to Destroy Pan-Germany. National
Review</i>, January, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>The Western Front and Political Strategy</i>. <i>National
Review</i>, July, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>FORMAN, JOSEPH: <i>The Liberation of the Czecho-Slovaks.
Nineteenth Century</i>, March, 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>GRIBBLE, FRANCIS: <i>Czech Claims and Magyar Intrigues.
Nineteenth Century</i>, March, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>The Passing of a Legend. Nineteenth Century</i>,
October, 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>LANDA, M.J.: <i>Bohemia</i><i> and the War. Contemporary</i>,
July, 1915.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>AN OLD MAZZINIAN: <i>Italy</i><i> and the Nationalities of </i><i>Austria-Hungary</i><i>.
Contemporary</i>, June, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>NOSEK, VLADIMIR: <i>The New Spirit in </i><i>Austria</i>. A
Reply to Mr. Brailsford. <i>Contemporary</i>, October, 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>Bohemia</i><i> as a Bulwark against Pan-Germanism.
National Review</i>, July, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>POLITICUS: <i>Austria</i><i>'s Hour of Destiny. Fortnightly</i>,
August, 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal><i>Round Table</i>, Quarterly Review of the Politics of the
Empire: No. 16 (September, 1914): <i>Origins of the War.</i></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----No. 17 (December, 1914): <i>Racial Problems in </i><i>Austria-Hungary</i><i>.</i></p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----No. 26 (March, 1917): <i>Methods of Ascendancy: </i><i>Bohemia</i>.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>SELVER, PAUL: <i>Březina's Poetry. The Quest</i>,
January, 1916.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>Modern Czech Poetry. Poetry Review</i>, May, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>SETON-WATSON, R.W.: <i>Pan-Slavism. Contemporary</i>,
October, 1916.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>Austria-Hungary</i><i> and the Federal System.
Contemporary</i>, March, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>STEED, HENRY WICKHAM: <i>The Quintessence of </i><i>Austria</i><i>.
</i><i>Edinburgh</i><i> Review</i>, October, 1915.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>The Programme for Peace. </i><i>Edinburgh</i><i>
Review</i>, April, 1916.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>----<i>What is </i><i>Austria</i><i>? </i><i>Edinburgh</i><i>
Review</i>, October, 1917.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>TAYLOR, A.H.E.: <i>The Entente and </i><i>Austria</i><i>.
Fortnightly</i>, May, 1918.</p>
<p class=MsoNormal>For a detailed and exhaustive list of all writings in the
English language on Bohemia and the Czecho-Slovaks, see <i>Bohemian
Bibliography</i>, by Thomas Čapek and Anna Vostrovsky Čapek,
published by the Fleming H. Revell Co., Chicago, New York, Edinburgh and London,
1918.</p>
</div>
<pre>
End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of Independent Bohemia, by Vladimir Nosek
*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK INDEPENDENT BOHEMIA ***
This file should be named 8iboh10h.htm or 8iboh10h.zip
Corrected EDITIONS of our eBooks get a new NUMBER, 8iboh11h.htm
VERSIONS based on separate sources get new LETTER, 8iboh10ah.htm
Produced by Juliet Sutherland, David Kline and PG Distributed Proofreaders
Project Gutenberg eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the US
unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we usually do not
keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.
We are now trying to release all our eBooks one year in advance
of the official release dates, leaving time for better editing.
Please be encouraged to tell us about any error or corrections,
even years after the official publication date.
Please note neither this listing nor its contents are final til
midnight of the last day of the month of any such announcement.
The official release date of all Project Gutenberg eBooks is at
Midnight, Central Time, of the last day of the stated month. A
preliminary version may often be posted for suggestion, comment
and editing by those who wish to do so.
Most people start at our Web sites at:
http://gutenberg.net or
http://promo.net/pg
These Web sites include award-winning information about Project
Gutenberg, including how to donate, how to help produce our new
eBooks, and how to subscribe to our email newsletter (free!).
Those of you who want to download any eBook before announcement
can get to them as follows, and just download by date. This is
also a good way to get them instantly upon announcement, as the
indexes our cataloguers produce obviously take a while after an
announcement goes out in the Project Gutenberg Newsletter.
http://www.ibiblio.org/gutenberg/etext03 or
ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/etext03
Or /etext02, 01, 00, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 92, 91 or 90
Just search by the first five letters of the filename you want,
as it appears in our Newsletters.
Information about Project Gutenberg (one page)
We produce about two million dollars for each hour we work. The
time it takes us, a rather conservative estimate, is fifty hours
to get any eBook selected, entered, proofread, edited, copyright
searched and analyzed, the copyright letters written, etc. Our
projected audience is one hundred million readers. If the value
per text is nominally estimated at one dollar then we produce $2
million dollars per hour in 2002 as we release over 100 new text
files per month: 1240 more eBooks in 2001 for a total of 4000+
We are already on our way to trying for 2000 more eBooks in 2002
If they reach just 1-2% of the world's population then the total
will reach over half a trillion eBooks given away by year's end.
The Goal of Project Gutenberg is to Give Away 1 Trillion eBooks!
This is ten thousand titles each to one hundred million readers,
which is only about 4% of the present number of computer users.
Here is the briefest record of our progress (* means estimated):
eBooks Year Month
1 1971 July
10 1991 January
100 1994 January
1000 1997 August
1500 1998 October
2000 1999 December
2500 2000 December
3000 2001 November
4000 2001 October/November
6000 2002 December*
9000 2003 November*
10000 2004 January*
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been created
to secure a future for Project Gutenberg into the next millennium.
We need your donations more than ever!
As of February, 2002, contributions are being solicited from people
and organizations in: Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Connecticut,
Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois,
Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts,
Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New
Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio,
Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South
Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West
Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming.
We have filed in all 50 states now, but these are the only ones
that have responded.
As the requirements for other states are met, additions to this list
will be made and fund raising will begin in the additional states.
Please feel free to ask to check the status of your state.
In answer to various questions we have received on this:
We are constantly working on finishing the paperwork to legally
request donations in all 50 states. If your state is not listed and
you would like to know if we have added it since the list you have,
just ask.
While we cannot solicit donations from people in states where we are
not yet registered, we know of no prohibition against accepting
donations from donors in these states who approach us with an offer to
donate.
International donations are accepted, but we don't know ANYTHING about
how to make them tax-deductible, or even if they CAN be made
deductible, and don't have the staff to handle it even if there are
ways.
Donations by check or money order may be sent to:
Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
PMB 113
1739 University Ave.
Oxford, MS 38655-4109
Contact us if you want to arrange for a wire transfer or payment
method other than by check or money order.
The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation has been approved by
the US Internal Revenue Service as a 501(c)(3) organization with EIN
[Employee Identification Number] 64-622154. Donations are
tax-deductible to the maximum extent permitted by law. As fund-raising
requirements for other states are met, additions to this list will be
made and fund-raising will begin in the additional states.
We need your donations more than ever!
You can get up to date donation information online at:
http://www.gutenberg.net/donation.html
***
If you can't reach Project Gutenberg,
you can always email directly to:
Michael S. Hart hart@pobox.com
Prof. Hart will answer or forward your message.
We would prefer to send you information by email.
**The Legal Small Print**
(Three Pages)
***START**THE SMALL PRINT!**FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS**START***
Why is this "Small Print!" statement here? You know: lawyers.
They tell us you might sue us if there is something wrong with
your copy of this eBook, even if you got it for free from
someone other than us, and even if what's wrong is not our
fault. So, among other things, this "Small Print!" statement
disclaims most of our liability to you. It also tells you how
you may distribute copies of this eBook if you want to.
*BEFORE!* YOU USE OR READ THIS EBOOK
By using or reading any part of this PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm
eBook, you indicate that you understand, agree to and accept
this "Small Print!" statement. If you do not, you can receive
a refund of the money (if any) you paid for this eBook by
sending a request within 30 days of receiving it to the person
you got it from. If you received this eBook on a physical
medium (such as a disk), you must return it with your request.
ABOUT PROJECT GUTENBERG-TM EBOOKS
This PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook, like most PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBooks,
is a "public domain" work distributed by Professor Michael S. Hart
through the Project Gutenberg Association (the "Project").
Among other things, this means that no one owns a United States copyright
on or for this work, so the Project (and you!) can copy and
distribute it in the United States without permission and
without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth
below, apply if you wish to copy and distribute this eBook
under the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark.
Please do not use the "PROJECT GUTENBERG" trademark to market
any commercial products without permission.
To create these eBooks, the Project expends considerable
efforts to identify, transcribe and proofread public domain
works. Despite these efforts, the Project's eBooks and any
medium they may be on may contain "Defects". Among other
things, Defects may take the form of incomplete, inaccurate or
corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other
intellectual property infringement, a defective or damaged
disk or other eBook medium, a computer virus, or computer
codes that damage or cannot be read by your equipment.
LIMITED WARRANTY; DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES
But for the "Right of Replacement or Refund" described below,
[1] Michael Hart and the Foundation (and any other party you may
receive this eBook from as a PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm eBook) disclaims
all liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including
legal fees, and [2] YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE OR
UNDER STRICT LIABILITY, OR FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY OR CONTRACT,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE
OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
If you discover a Defect in this eBook within 90 days of
receiving it, you can receive a refund of the money (if any)
you paid for it by sending an explanatory note within that
time to the person you received it from. If you received it
on a physical medium, you must return it with your note, and
such person may choose to alternatively give you a replacement
copy. If you received it electronically, such person may
choose to alternatively give you a second opportunity to
receive it electronically.
THIS EBOOK IS OTHERWISE PROVIDED TO YOU "AS-IS". NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, ARE MADE TO YOU AS
TO THE EBOOK OR ANY MEDIUM IT MAY BE ON, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Some states do not allow disclaimers of implied warranties or
the exclusion or limitation of consequential damages, so the
above disclaimers and exclusions may not apply to you, and you
may have other legal rights.
INDEMNITY
You will indemnify and hold Michael Hart, the Foundation,
and its trustees and agents, and any volunteers associated
with the production and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm
texts harmless, from all liability, cost and expense, including
legal fees, that arise directly or indirectly from any of the
following that you do or cause: [1] distribution of this eBook,
[2] alteration, modification, or addition to the eBook,
or [3] any Defect.
DISTRIBUTION UNDER "PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm"
You may distribute copies of this eBook electronically, or by
disk, book or any other medium if you either delete this
"Small Print!" and all other references to Project Gutenberg,
or:
[1] Only give exact copies of it. Among other things, this
requires that you do not remove, alter or modify the
eBook or this "small print!" statement. You may however,
if you wish, distribute this eBook in machine readable
binary, compressed, mark-up, or proprietary form,
including any form resulting from conversion by word
processing or hypertext software, but only so long as
*EITHER*:
[*] The eBook, when displayed, is clearly readable, and
does *not* contain characters other than those
intended by the author of the work, although tilde
(~), asterisk (*) and underline (_) characters may
be used to convey punctuation intended by the
author, and additional characters may be used to
indicate hypertext links; OR
[*] The eBook may be readily converted by the reader at
no expense into plain ASCII, EBCDIC or equivalent
form by the program that displays the eBook (as is
the case, for instance, with most word processors);
OR
[*] You provide, or agree to also provide on request at
no additional cost, fee or expense, a copy of the
eBook in its original plain ASCII form (or in EBCDIC
or other equivalent proprietary form).
[2] Honor the eBook refund and replacement provisions of this
"Small Print!" statement.
[3] Pay a trademark license fee to the Foundation of 20% of the
gross profits you derive calculated using the method you
already use to calculate your applicable taxes. If you
don't derive profits, no royalty is due. Royalties are
payable to "Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation"
the 60 days following each date you prepare (or were
legally required to prepare) your annual (or equivalent
periodic) tax return. Please contact us beforehand to
let us know your plans and to work out the details.
WHAT IF YOU *WANT* TO SEND MONEY EVEN IF YOU DON'T HAVE TO?
Project Gutenberg is dedicated to increasing the number of
public domain and licensed works that can be freely distributed
in machine readable form.
The Project gratefully accepts contributions of money, time,
public domain materials, or royalty free copyright licenses.
Money should be paid to the:
"Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."
If you are interested in contributing scanning equipment or
software or other items, please contact Michael Hart at:
hart@pobox.com
[Portions of this eBook's header and trailer may be reprinted only
when distributed free of all fees. Copyright (C) 2001, 2002 by
Michael S. Hart. Project Gutenberg is a TradeMark and may not be
used in any sales of Project Gutenberg eBooks or other materials be
they hardware or software or any other related product without
express permission.]
*END THE SMALL PRINT! FOR PUBLIC DOMAIN EBOOKS*Ver.02/11/02*END*
</pre>
</body>
</html>
|
