diff options
| author | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:32:31 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Roger Frank <rfrank@pglaf.org> | 2025-10-15 05:32:31 -0700 |
| commit | bf928fa454a188f1364148358f568453f2ba93c8 (patch) | |
| tree | 99b01d991f78bff1bfa794d7a265bc9cd99cf326 /8910-h | |
Diffstat (limited to '8910-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 8910-h/8910-h.htm | 13523 |
1 files changed, 13523 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/8910-h/8910-h.htm b/8910-h/8910-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4921ba0 --- /dev/null +++ b/8910-h/8910-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,13523 @@ +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?> + +<!DOCTYPE html + PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" + "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd" > + +<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" lang="en"> + <head> + <title> + The System of Nature, Volume Ii,, by Paul Henri Thiery (baron D'holbach) + </title> + <style type="text/css" xml:space="preserve"> + + body { margin:5%; background:#faebd0; text-align:justify} + P { text-indent: 1em; margin-top: .25em; margin-bottom: .25em; } + H1,H2,H3,H4,H5,H6 { text-align: center; margin-left: 15%; margin-right: 15%; } + hr { width: 50%; text-align: center;} + .foot { margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 20%; text-align: justify; text-indent: -3em; font-size: 90%; } + blockquote {font-size: 97%; font-style: italic; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%;} + .mynote {background-color: #DDE; color: #000; padding: .5em; margin-left: 10%; margin-right: 10%; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 95%;} + .toc { margin-left: 10%; margin-bottom: .75em;} + .toc2 { margin-left: 20%;} + div.fig { display:block; margin:0 auto; text-align:center; } + div.middle { margin-left: 20%; margin-right: 10%; text-align: justify; } + .figleft {float: left; margin-left: 0%; margin-right: 1%;} + .figright {float: right; margin-right: 0%; margin-left: 1%;} + .pagenum {display:inline; font-size: 70%; font-style:normal; + margin: 0; padding: 0; position: absolute; right: 1%; + text-align: right;} + .side { float: right; font-size: 75%; width: 25%; padding-left: 0.8em; + border-left: dashed thin; margin-left: 0.8em; text-align: left; + text-indent: 0; font-weight: bold; font-style: italic; + font-weight: bold; color: black; background: #eeeeee; border: solid 1px;} + pre { font-style: italic; font-size: 90%; margin-left: 10%;} + +</style> + </head> + <body> + + +<pre> + +The Project Gutenberg EBook of The System of Nature, Volume 2, by +Paul Henri Thiery (Baron D'Holbach) + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + + +Title: The System of Nature, Volume 2 + +Author: Paul Henri Thiery (Baron D'Holbach) + +Commentator: Samuel Wilkinson + +Translator: Samuel Wilkinson + + +Release Date: September, 2005 [EBook #8910] +This file was first posted on August 23, 2003 +Last Updated: June 8, 2013 + +Language: English + +Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 + +*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE SYSTEM OF NATURE, VOLUME 2 *** + + + + +Text file produced by Freethought Archives and Distributed Proofreaders + +HTML file produced by David Widger + + + +</pre> + + <div style="height: 8em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h1> + THE SYSTEM OF NATURE, VOLUME II, + </h1> + <h4> + or, + </h4> + <h2> + <i>THE LAWS</i> of the MORAL AND PHYSICAL WORLD. + </h2> + <p> + <br /> + </p> + <h2> + By Paul Henri Thiery (Baron D'Holbach) + </h2> + <p> + <br /> + </p> + <h4> + Translated from the Original French of M. De Mirabaud + </h4> + <p> + <br /> + </p> + <div class="middle"> + <p> + PRODUCTION NOTES: First published in French in 1770 under the pseudonym + of Mirabaud. This e-book based on a facsimile reprint of an English + translation originally published 1820-21. This e-text covers the second + of the original two volumes. + </p> + </div> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <p> + <b>CONTENTS</b> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_TOC"> DETAILED CONTENTS </a> + </p> + <p> + <br /> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0001"> <b>MIRABAUD'S SYSTEM OF NATURE</b> </a> + </p> + <p> + <br /> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_PART"> <b>PART II.</b> </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0003"> CHAP. I. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0004"> CHAP. II. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0005"> CHAP. III. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0006"> CHAP. IV. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0007"> CHAP. V. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0008"> CHAP. VI. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0009"> CHAP. VII. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0010"> CHAP. VIII. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0011"> CHAP. IX. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0012"> CHAP. X. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0013"> CHAP. XI. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0014"> CHAP. XII. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0015"> CHAP. XIII. </a> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0016"> CHAP. XIV. </a> + </p> + <p> + <br /> + </p> + <p class="toc"> + <a href="#link2H_4_0017"> [TRANSLATOR'S APPENDIX] </a> + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_TOC" id="link2H_TOC"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <div class="middle"> + <p> + <b>DETAILED CONTENTS</b> + </p> + PART II. Of the Divinity.—Proofs of his existence.— <br /> Of + his attributes.—Of his influence over the happiness of man. <br /> + CHAP. I. The origin of man's ideas upon the Divinity. <br /> CHAP. II. Of + mythology.—Of theology <br /> CHAP. III. Of the confused and + contradictory ideas of theology. <br /> CHAP. IV. Examination of the proofs + of the existence of the Divinity, as <br /> given by Clarke. <br /> CHAP. V. + Examination of the proofs offered by Descartes, Malebranche, <br /> Newton, + &c. <br /> CHAP. VI. Of Pantheism; or of the natural ideas of the + Divinity. <br /> CHAP. VII. Of Theism—Of the System of Optimism—Of + Final Causes <br /> CHAP. VIII. Examination of the Advantages which result + from Man's <br /> Notions on the Divinity;—of their Influence upon + Morals;—upon <br /> Politics;—upon Science;—upon the + Happiness of Nations, and that of <br /> individuals. <br /> CHAP. IX. + Theological Notions cannot be the Basis of <br /> Morality.—Comparison + between Theological Ethics and Natural <br /> Morality—Theology + prejudicial to the Human Mind. <br /> CHAP. X. Man can form no Conclusion + from the Ideas which are offered him <br /> of the Divinity.—Of their + want of just Inference.—Of the Inutility of <br /> his Conduct. <br /> + CHAP. XI Defence of the Sentiments contained in this Work.—Of <br /> + Impiety.—Do there exist Atheists? <br /> CHAP. XII. Is what is termed + Atheism, compatible with Morality? <br /> CHAP. XIII. Of the motives which + lead to what is falsely called <br /> Atheism.—Can this System be + dangerous?—Can it be embraced by the <br /> Illiterate? <br /> CHAP. + XIV. A summary of the Code of Nature. <br /> A Brief Sketch of the Life and + Writings of M. de Mirabaud <br /> + </div> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0001" id="link2H_4_0001"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h1> + MIRABAUD'S SYSTEM OF NATURE + </h1> + <h3> + Translated from the Original By Samuel Wilkinson + </h3> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_PART" id="link2H_PART"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + PART II. + </h2> + <h3> + ON THE DIVINITY:—PROOFS OF HIS EXISTENCE:—OF HIS ATTRIBUTES: + OF HIS INFLUENCE OVER THE HAPPINESS OF MAN. + </h3> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0003" id="link2H_4_0003"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. I. + </h2> + <h3> + <i>The Origin of Man's Ideas upon the Divinity.</i> + </h3> + <p> + If man possessed the courage, if he had the requisite industry to recur to + the source of those opinions which are most deeply engraven on his brain; + if he rendered to himself a faithful account of the reasons which make him + hold these opinions as sacred; if he coolly examined the basis of his + hopes, the foundation of his fears, he would find that it very frequently + happens, those objects, or those ideas which move him most powerfully, + either have no real existence, or are words devoid of meaning, which + terror has conjured up to explain some sudden disaster; that they are + often phantoms engendered by a disordered imagination, modified by + ignorance; the effect of an ardent mind distracted by contending passions, + which prevent him from either reasoning justly, or consulting experience + in his judgment; that this mind often labours with a precipitancy that + throws his intellectual faculties into confusion; that bewilders his + ideas; that consequently he gives a substance and a form to chimeras, to + airy nothings, which he afterwards idolizes from sloth, reverences from + prejudice. + </p> + <p> + A sensible being placed in a nature where every part is in motion, has + various feelings, in consequence of either the agreeable or disagreeable + effects which he is obliged to experience from this continued action and + re-action; in consequence he either finds himself happy or miserable; + according to the quality of the sensations excited in him, he will love or + fear, seek after or fly from, the real or supposed causes of such marked + effects operated on his machine. But if he is ignorant of nature, if he is + destitute of experience, he will frequently deceive himself as to these + causes; for want of either capability or inclination to recur back to + them, he will neither have a true knowledge of their energy, nor a clear + idea of their mode of acting: thus until reiterated experience shall have + formed his ideas, until the mirror of truth shall have shewn him the + judgment he ought to make, he will be involved in trouble, a prey to + incertitude, a victim to credulity. + </p> + <p> + Man is a being who brings with him nothing into the world save an aptitude + to feeling in a manner more or less lively according to his individual + organization: he has no innate knowledge of any of the causes that act + upon him: by degrees his faculty of feeling discovers to him their various + qualities; he learns to judge of them; time familiarizes him with their + properties; he attaches ideas to them, according to the manner in which + they have affected him; these ideas are correct or otherwise, in a ratio + to the soundness of his organic structure: his judgment is faulty or not, + as these organs are either well or ill-constituted; in proportion as they + are competent to afford him sure and reiterated experience. + </p> + <p> + The first moments of man are marked by his wants; that is to say, the + first impulse he receives is to conserve his existence; this he would not + be able to maintain without the concurrence of many analogous causes: + these wants in a sensible being, manifest themselves by a general languor, + a sinking, a confusion in his machine, which gives him the consciousness + of a painful sensation: this derangement subsists, is even augmented, + until the cause suitable to remove it re-establishes the harmony so + necessary to the existence of the human frame. Want, therefore, is the + first evil man experiences; nevertheless it is requisite to the + maintenance of his existence. Was it not for this derangement of his body, + which obliges him to furnish its remedy, he would not be warned of the + necessity of preserving the existence he has received. Without wants man + would be an insensible machine, similar to a vegetable; like that he would + be incapable of preserving himself; he would not be competent to using the + means required to conserve his being. To his wants are to be ascribed his + passions; his desires; the exercise of his corporeal functions; the play + of his intellectual faculties: they are his wants that oblige him to + think; that determine his will, that induce him to act; it is to satisfy + them or rather to put an end to the painful sensations excited by their + presence, that according to his capacity, to the natural sensibility of + his soul, to the energies which are peculiar to himself, he gives play to + his faculties, exerts the activity of his bodily strength, or displays the + extensive powers of his mind. His wants being perpetual, he is obliged to + labour without relaxation, to procure objects competent to satisfy them. + In a word, it is owing to his multiplied wants that man's energy is kept + in a state of continual activity: as soon as he ceases to have wants, he + falls into inaction—becomes listless—declines into apathy—sinks + into a languor that is incommodious to his feelings or prejudicial to his + existence: this lethargic state of weariness lasts until new wants, by + giving him fresh activity, rouse his dormant faculties—throw off his + stupor—re-animate his vigour, and destroy the sluggishness to which + he had become a prey. + </p> + <p> + From hence it will be obvious that evil is necessary to man; without it he + would neither be in a condition to know that which injures him; to avoid + its presence; or to seek his own welfare: without this stimulus, he would + differ in nothing from insensible, unorganized beings: if those evanescent + evils which he calls <i>wants</i>, did not oblige him to call forth his + faculties, to set his energies in motion, to cull experience, to compare + objects, to discriminate them, to separate those which have the + capabilities to injure him, from those which possess the means to benefit + him, he would be insensible to happiness—inadequate to enjoyment. In + short, <i>without evil man would be ignorant of good</i>; he would be + continually exposed to perish like the leaf on a tree. He would resemble + an infant, who, destitute of experience, runs the risque of meeting his + destruction at every step he takes, unguarded by his nurse. What the nurse + is to the child, experience is to the adult; when either are wanting, + these children of different lustres generally go astray: frequently + encounter disaster. Without evil he would be unable to judge of any thing; + he would have no preference; his will would be without volition, he would + be destitute of passions; desire would find no place in his heart; he + would not revolt at the most disgusting objects; he would not strive to + put them away; he would neither have stimuli to love, nor motives to fear + any thing; he would be an insensible automaton; he would no longer be a + man. + </p> + <p> + If no evil had existed in this world, man would never have dreamt of those + numerous divinities, to whom he has rendered such various modes of + worship. If nature had permitted him easily to satisfy all his + regenerating wants, if she had given him none but agreeable sensations, + his days would have uninterruptedly rolled on in one perpetual uniformity; + he would never have discovered his own nakedness; he would never have had + motives to search after the unknown causes of things—to meditate in + pain. Therefore man, always contented, would only have occupied himself + with satisfying his wants; with enjoying the present, with feeling the + influence of objects, that would unceasingly warn him of his existence in + a mode that he must necessarily approve; nothing would alarm his heart; + every thing would be analogous to his existence: he would neither know + fear, experience distrust, nor have inquietude for the future: these + feelings can only be the consequence of some troublesome sensation, which + must have anteriorly affected him, or which by disturbing the harmony of + his machine, has interrupted the course of his happiness; which has shewn + him he is naked. + </p> + <p> + Independent of those wants which in man renew themselves every instant; + which he frequently finds it impossible to satisfy; every individual + experiences a multiplicity of evils—he suffers from the inclemency + of the seasons—he pines in penury—he is infected with plague—he + is scourged by war—he is the victim of famine—he is afflicted + with disease—he is the sport of a thousand accidents, &c. This + is the reason why all men are fearful; why the whole human race are + diffident. The knowledge he has of pain alarms him upon all unknown + causes, that is to say, upon all those of which he has not yet experienced + the effect; this experience made with precipitation, or if it be + preferred, by instinct, places him on his guard against all those objects + from the operation of which he is ignorant what consequences may result to + himself. + </p> + <p> + His inquietude is in proportion; his fears keep pace with the extent of + the disorder which these objects produce in him; they are measured by + their rarity, that is to say, by the inexperience he has of them; by the + natural sensibility of the soul; and by the ardour of his imagination. The + wore ignorant man is, the less experience he has, the more he is + susceptible of fear; solitude, the obscurity of a forest, silence, and the + darkness of night, desolate ruins, the roaring of the wind, sudden, + confused noises, are objects of terror to all who are unaccustomed to + these things. The uninformed man is a child whom every thing astonishes; + who trembles at every thing he encounters: his alarms disappear, his fears + diminish, his mind becomes calm, in proportion as experience familiarizes + him, more or less, with natural effects; his fears cease entirely, as soon + as he understands, or believes he understands, the causes that act; or + when he knows how to avoid their effects. But if he cannot penetrate the + causes which disturb him, if he cannot discover the agents by whom he + suffers, if he cannot find to what account to place the confusion he + experiences, his inquietude augments; his fears redouble; his imagination + leads him astray; it exaggerates his evil; paints in a disorderly manner + these unknown objects of his terror; magnifies their powers; then making + an analogy between them and those terrific objects, with whom he is + already acquainted, he suggests to himself the means he usually takes to + mitigate their anger; to conciliate their kindness; he employs similar + measures to soften the anger, to disarm the power, to avert the effects of + the concealed cause which gives birth to his inquietudes, which fills him + with anxiety, which alarms his fears. It is thus his weakness, aided by + ignorance, renders him superstitious. + </p> + <p> + There are very few men, even in our own day, who have sufficiently studied + nature, who are fully apprised of physical causes, or with the effects + they must necessarily produce. This ignorance, without doubt, was much + greater in the more remote ages of the world, when the human mind, yet in + its infancy, had not collected that experience, taken that expansion, made + those strides towards improvement, which distinguishes the present from + the past. Savages dispersed, erratic, thinly scattered up and down, knew + the course of nature either very imperfectly or not at all; society alone + perfects human knowledge: it requires not only multiplied but combined + efforts to unravel the secrets of nature. This granted, all natural causes + were mysteries to our wandering ancestors; the entire of nature was an + enigma to them; all its phenomena was marvellous, every event inspired + terror to beings who were destitute of experience; almost every thing, + they saw must have appeared to them strange, unusual, contrary to their + idea of the order of things. + </p> + <p> + It cannot then furnish matter for surprise, if we behold men in the + present day trembling at the sight of those objects which have formerly + filled their fathers with dismay. <i>Eclipse, comets, meteors</i>, were, + in ancient days, subjects of alarm to all the people of the earth: these + effects, so natural in the eyes of the sound philosopher, who has by + degrees fathomed their true causes, have yet the right, possess the power, + to alarm the most numerous, to excite the fears of the least instructed + part of modern nations. The people of the present day, as well as their + ignorant ancestors, find something marvellous, believe there is a + supernatural agency in all those objects to which their eyes are + unaccustomed; they consider all those unknown causes as wonderful, that + act with a force of which their mind has no idea it is possible the known + agents are capable. The ignorant see wonders <i>prodigies, miracles</i>, + in all those striking effects of which they are unable to render + themselves a satisfactory account; all the causes which produce them they + think <i>supernatural</i>; this, however, really implies nothing more than + that they are not familiar to them, or that they have not hitherto + witnessed natural agents, whose energy was equal to the production of + effects so rare, so astonishing, as those with which their sight has been + appalled. + </p> + <p> + Besides the ordinary phenomena to which nations were witnesses without + being competent to unravel the causes, they have in times very remote from + ours, experienced calamities, whether general or local, which filled them + with the most cruel inquietude; which plunged them into an abyss of + consternation. The traditions of all people, the annals of all nations, + recal, even at this day, melancholy events, physical disasters, dreadful + catastrophes, which had the effect of spreading universal terror among our + forefathers, But when history should be silent on these stupendous + revolutions, would not our own reflection on what passes under our eyes be + sufficient to convince us, that all parts of our globe have been, and + following the course of things, will necessarily be again violently + agitated, overturned, changed, overflowed, in a state of conflagration? + Vast continents have been inundated, seas breaking their limits have + usurped the dominion of the earth; at length retiring, these waters have + left striking, proofs of their presence, by the marine vestiges of shells, + skeletons of sea fish, &c. which the attentive observer meets with at + every step, in the bowels of those fertile countries we now inhabit—subterraneous + fires have opened to themselves the most frightful volcanoes, whose + craters frequently issue destruction on every side. In short, the elements + unloosed, have at various times, disputed among themselves the empire of + our globe; this exhibits evidence of the fact, by those vast heaps of + wreck, those stupendous ruins spread over its surface. What, then, must + have been the fears of mankind, who in those countries believed he beheld + the entire of nature armed against his peace, menacing with destruction + his very abode? What must have been the inquietude of a people taken thus + unprovided, who fancied they saw nature cruelly labouring to their + annihilation? Who beheld a world ready to be dashed into atoms; who + witnessed the earth suddenly rent asunder; whose yawning chasm was the + grave of large cities, whole provinces, entire nations? What ideas must + mortals, thus overwhelmed with terror, form to themselves of the + irresistible cause that could produce such extended effects? Without doubt + they did not attribute these wide spreading calamities to nature; neither + did they conceive they were mere physical causes; they could not suspect + she was the author, the accomplice of the confusion she herself + experienced; they did not see that these tremendous revolutions, these + overpowering disorders, were the necessary result of her immutable laws; + that they contributed to the general order by which she subsists; that, in + point of fact, there was nothing more surprising in the inundation of + large portions of the earth, in the swallowing up an entire nation, in a + volcanic conflagration spreading destruction over whole provinces, than + there is in a stone falling to the earth, or the death of a fly; that each + equally has its spring in the necessity of things. + </p> + <p> + It was under these astounding circumstances, that nations, bathed in the + most bitter tears, perplexed with the most frightful visions, electrified + with terror, not believing there existed on this mundane ball, causes + sufficiently powerful to operate the gigantic phenomena that filled their + minds with dismay, carried their streaming eyes towards heaven, where + their tremulous fears led them to suppose these unknown agents, whose + unprovoked enmity destroyed, their earthly felicity, could alone reside. + </p> + <p> + It was in the lap of ignorance, in the season of alarm, in the bosom of + calamity, that mankind ever formed his first notions of the <i>Divinity</i>. + From hence it is obvious that his ideas on this subject are to be + suspected, that his notions are in a great measure false, that they are + always afflicting. Indeed, upon whatever part of our sphere we cast our + eyes, whether it be upon the frozen climates of the north, upon the + parching regions of the south, or under the more temperate zones, we every + where behold the people when assailed by misfortunes, have either made to + themselves national gods, or else have adopted those which have been given + them by their conquerors; before these beings, either of their own + creation or adoption, they have tremblingly prostrated themselves in the + hour of calamity, soliciting relief; have ignorantly attributed to blocks + of stone, or to men like themselves, those natural effects which were + above their comprehension; the inhabitants of many nations, not contented + with the national gods, made each to himself one or more gods, which he + supposed presided exclusively over his own household, from whom he + supposed he derived his own peculiar happiness, to whom he attributed all + his domestic misfortunes. The idea of these powerful agents, these + supposed distributors of good and evil, was always associated with that of + terror; their name was never pronounced without recalling to man's wind + either his own particular calamities or those of his fathers. In many + places man trembles at this day, because his progenitors have trembled for + thousands of years past. The thought of his gods always awakened in man + the most afflicting ideas. If he recurred to the source of his actual + fears, to the commencement of those melancholy impressions that stamp + themselves in his mind when their name is announced, he would find it in + the conflagrations, in the revolutions, in those extended disasters, that + have at various times destroyed large portions of the human race; that + overwhelmed with dismay those miserable beings who escaped the destruction + of the earth; these in transmitting to posterity, the tradition of such + afflicting events, have also transmitted to him their fears; have + delivered down to their successors, those gloomy ideas which their + bewildered imaginations, coupled with their barbarous ignorance of natural + causes, had formed to them of the anger of their irritated gods, to which + their alarm falsely attributed these sweeping disasters. + </p> + <p> + If the gods of nations had their birth in the bosom of alarm, it was again + in that of despair that each individual formed the unknown power that he + made exclusively for himself. Ignorant of physical causes, unpractised in + their mode of action, unaccustomed to their effects, whenever he + experienced any serious misfortune, whenever he was afflicted with any + grievous sensation, he was at a loss how to account for it; he therefore + attributed it to his household gods, to whom he made an immediate + supplication for assistance, or rather for forbearance of further + affliction: this disposition in man has been finely pourtrayed by Aesop in + his fable of "the Waggoner and Hercules." The motion which in despight of + himself was excited in his machine, his diseases, his troubles, his + passions, his inquietude, the painful alterations his frame underwent, + without his being able to fathom the true causes; at length death, of + which the aspect in so formidable to a being strongly attached to + existence, were effects he looked upon either as supernatural, or else he + conceived they were repugnant to his actual nature; he attributed them to + some mighty cause, which maugre all his efforts, disposed of him at each, + moment. Thus palsied with alarm, benumbed with terror, he pensively + meditated upon his sorrows; agitated with fear, he sought for means to + avert the calamities that threatened him with destruction; his + imagination, thus rendered desperate by his endurance of evils which he + found inevitable, formed to him those phantoms which he called gods; + before whom he trembled from a consciousness of his own weakness; thus + disposed, he endeavoured by prostration, by sacrifices, by prayers, to + disarm the anger of these imaginary beings to which his trepidation had + given birth; whom he ignorantly imagined to be the cause of his misery, + whom his fancy painted to him as endowed with the power of alleviating his + sufferings: it was thus in the extremity of his grief, in the exacerbation + of his mind, weighed down with misfortune, that unhappy man fashioned + those chimeras which filled him with the most gloomy ideas, which he + transmitted to his posterity, as the surest means of avoiding the evils to + which he had been himself subjected. + </p> + <p> + Man never judges of those objects of which he is ignorant, but through the + medium of those which come within his knowledge: thus man, taking himself + for the model, ascribed will, intelligence, design, projects, passions; in + a word, qualities analogous to his own, to all those unknown causes of + which he experienced the action. As soon as a visible or supposed cause + affects him in an agreeable manner, or in a mode favourable to his + existence, he concludes it to be good, to be well intentioned towards him: + on the contrary, he judges all those to be bad in their nature, evilly + disposed, to have the intention of injuring him, which cause him any + painful sensations. He attributes views, plans, a system of conduct like + his own, to every thing which to his limited ideas appears of itself to + produce connected effects; to act with regularity; to constantly operate + in the same manner; that uniformly produces the same sensations in his own + person. According to these notions, which he always borrows from himself, + from his own peculiar mode of action, he either loves or fears those + objects which have affected him; he in consequence approaches them with + confidence or timidity; seeks after them or flies from them in proportion + as the feelings they have excited are either pleasant or painful. Having + travelled thus far, he presently addresses them; he invokes their aid; + prays to them for succour; conjures them to cease his afflictions; to + forbear tormenting him; as he finds himself sensible to presents, pleased + with submission, he tries to win them to his interests by humiliation, by + sacrifices; he exercises towards them the hospitality he himself loves; he + gives them an asylum; he builds them a dwelling; he furnishes them with + costly raiment; he makes their altars smoke with delicious food; he + proffers to their acceptance the earliest flowers of spring; the finest + fruits of autumn; the rich grain of summer; in short he sets before them + all those things which he thinks will please them the most, because he + himself places the highest value on them. These dispositions enable us to + account for the formation of tutelary gods, of lares, of larvae, which + every man makes to himself in savage and unpolished nations. Thus we + perceive that weak superstitious mortals, ignorant of truth, devoid of + experience, regard as the arbiters of their fate, as the dispensers of + good and evil, animals, stones, unformed inanimate substances, which the + effort of their heated imaginations transform into gods, whom they invest + with intelligence, whom they clothe with desires, to whom they give + volition. + </p> + <p> + Another disposition which serves to deceive the savage man, which will + equally deceive those whom reason shall not enlighten on these subjects, + is his attachment to omens; or the fortuitous concurrence of certain + effects, with causes which have not produced them; the co-existence of + these effects with certain causes, which have not the slightest connection + with them, has frequently led astray very intelligent beings; nations who + considered themselves very enlightened; who have either been disinclined + or unable to disentangle the one from the other: thus the savage + attributes bounty or the will to render him service, to any object whether + animate or inanimate, such as a stone of a certain form, a rock, a + mountain, a tree, a serpent, an owl, &c. if every time he encounters + these objects in a certain position, it should so happen that he is more + than ordinarily successful in hunting, that he should take an unusual + quantity of fish, that he should be victorious in war, or that he should + compass any enterprize whatever that he may at that moment undertake: the + same savage will be quite as gratuitous in attaching malice, wickedness, + the determination to injure him, to either the same object in a different + position, or any others in a given posture, which way have met his eyes on + those days when he shall have suffered some grievous accident, have been + very unsuccessful in his undertakings, unfortunate in the chace, + disappointed in his draught of fish: incapable of reasoning he connects + these effects with causes, that reflection would convince him have nothing + in common with each other; that are entirely due to physical causes, to + necessary circumstances, over which neither himself nor his omens have the + least controul: nevertheless he finds it much easier to attribute them to + these imaginary causes; he therefore <i>deifies</i> them; looks upon them + as either his guardian angels, or else as his most inveterate enemies. + Having invested them with supernatural powers, he becomes anxious to + explain to himself their mode of action; his self-love prevents his + seeking elsewhere for the model: thus he assigns them all those motives + that actuate himself; he endows them with passions; he gives them design—intelligence—will—imagines + they can either injure him or benefit him, as he may render them + propitious or otherwise to his views: he ends with worshipping them; with + paying them divine honours; he appoints them priests; or at least always + consults them before he undertakes any object of moment: such is their + influence, that if they put on the evil position, he will lay aside the + most important undertaking. The savage in this is never more than an + infant, that is angry with the object that displeases him; just like the + dog who gnaws the stone by which he has been wounded, without recurring to + the hand by which it was thrown. + </p> + <p> + Such is the foundation of man's faith, in either happy or unhappy omens: + devoid of experience, unaccustomed to reason with precision, fearing to + call in the evidence of truth, he looks upon them either as gods + themselves, or else as warnings given him by his other gods, to whom he + attributes the faculties of sagacity and foresight, of which he is himself + miserably deficient. Ignorance, when involved in disaster, when immersed + in trouble, believes a stone, a reptile, a bird, much better instructed + than himself. The slender observation of the ignorant only serves to + render him more superstitious; he sees certain birds announce by their + flight, by their cries, certain changes in the weather, such as cold, + heat, rain, storms; he beholds at certain periods, vapours arise from the + bottom of some particular caverns? there needs nothing further to impress + upon him the belief, that these beings possess the knowledge of future + events; enjoy the gifts of prophecy: he looks upon them as supernatural + agents, employed by his gods: it is thus he becomes the dupe to his own + credulity. + </p> + <p> + If by degrees the truth flashing occasionally on his mind, experience and + reflection arrive at undeceiving him, with respect to the power, the + intelligence, the virtues actually residing in these objects; he at least + supposes them put in activity by some secret, some hidden cause; that they + are the instruments, employed by some invisible agent, who is either + friendly or inimical to his welfare. To this concealed agent, therefore, + he addresses himself; pays him his vows; emplores his assistance; + deprecates his wrath; seeks to propitiate him to his interests; is willing + to soften his anger; for this purpose he employs the same means, of which + he avails himself, either to appease or gain over the beings of his own + species. + </p> + <p> + Societies in their origin, seeing themselves frequently afflicted by + nature, supposed either the elements, or the concealed powers who + regulated them, possessed a will, views, wants, desires, similar to their + own. From hence, the sacrifices imagined to nourish them; the libations + poured out to them; the steams, the incense to gratify their olfactory + nerves. Their superstition led them to believe these elements or their + irritated movers were to be appeased like irritated man, by prayers, by + humiliation, by presents. Their imagination was ransacked to discover the + presents that would be most acceptable in their eyes; to ascertain the + oblations that would be most agreeable, the sacrifices that would most + surely propitiate their kindness: as these did not make known their + inclinations, man differed with his fellow on those most suitable; each + followed his own disposition; or rather each offered what was most + estimable in his own eyes; hence arose differences never to be reconciled + the bitterest animosities; the most unconquerable aversions; the most, + destructive jealousies! Thus some brought the fruits of the earth, others + offered sheaves of corn: some strewed flowers over their fanes; some + decorated them with the most costly jewels; some served them with meats; + others sacrificed lambs, heifers, bulls; at length such was their + delirium, such the wildness of their imaginations, that they stained their + altars with human gore, made oblations of young children immolated + virgins, to appease the anger of these supposed deities. + </p> + <p> + The old men, as having the most experience, were usually charged with the + conduct of these peace-offerings, from whence, the name PRIEST; [Greek + letters], <i>presbos</i>, in the Greek meaning an old man. These + accompanied them with ceremonies, instituted rites, used precautions by + consulting omens; adopted formalities, retraced to their fellow citizens + the notions transmitted to them by their forefathers; collected the + observations made by their ancestors; repeated the fables they had + received; added commentaries of their own; subjoined supplications to the + idols at whose shrine they were sacrificing. It is thus the sacerdotal + order was established; thus that public worship was established; by + degrees each community formed a body of tenets to be observed by the + citizens; these were transmitted from race to race; held sacred out of + reverence for their fathers; at length it was deemed sacrilege to doubt + these pandects in any one particular; even the errors, that had crept into + them with time, were beheld with reverential awe; he that ventured to + reason upon them, was looked upon as an enemy to the commonwealth; as one + whose impiety drew down upon them the vengeance of these adored beings, to + which alone imagination had given birth; not contented with adopting the + rituals, with following the ceremonies invented by themselves, one + community waged war against another, to oblige it to receive their + particular creeds; which the old men who regulated them, declared would + infallibly win them the favor of their tutelary deities: thus very often + to conciliate their favor, the victorious party immolated on the altars of + their gods, the bodies of their unhappy captives; frequently they carried + their savage barbarity the length of exterminating whole nations, who + happened to worship gods different from their own: thus it frequently + happened, that the friends of the serpent, when victorious, covered his + altars with the mangled carcases of the worshippers of the stone, whom the + fortune of war had placed in their hands: such were the unformed, the + precarious elements of which rude nations every where availed themselves + to compose their superstitions: they were always a system of conduct + invented by imagination: conceived in ignorance, organized in misfortune, + to render the unknown powers, to whom they believed nature was submitted, + either favorable to their views, or to, induce them to cease those + afflictions, which natural causes, for the wisest purposes, were + continually heaping upon them; thus some irascible, at the same time + placable being, was always chosen for the basis of the adopted + superstition; it was upon these puerile tenets, upon these absurd notions, + that the old men or the priests rested their doctrines; founded their + rights; established their authority: it was to render these fanciful + beings friendly to the race of man, that they erected, temples, raised + altars, loaded them with wealth; in short, it was from such rude + foundations, that arose the magnificent structure of superstition; under + which man trembled for thousands of years: which governed the condition of + society, which determined the actions of the people, gave the tone to the + character, deluged the earth with blood, for such a long series of ages. + But although these superstitions were originally invented by savages, they + still have the power of regulating the fate of many civilized nations, who + are not less tenacious of their chimeras, than their rude progenitors. + These systems, so ruinous in their principles, have been variously + modified by the human mind, of which it is the essence, to labour + incessantly on unknown objects; it always, commences by attaching to + these, a very first-rate importance, which it afterwards never dares + coolly to examine. + </p> + <p> + Such was the course of man's imagination, in the successive ideas which he + either formed to himself, or which he received from his fathers, upon the + divinity. The first theology of man was grounded on fear, modelled by + ignorance: either afflicted or benefitted by the elements, he adored these + elements themselves; by a parity of reasoning, if reasoning it can be + called, he extended his reverence to every material, coarse object; he + afterwards rendered his homage to the agents he supposed presiding over + these elements; to powerful genii; to inferior genii; to heroes; to men + endowed with either great or striking qualities. Time, aided by + reflection, with here and there a slight corruscation of truth, induced + him in some places to relinquish his original ideas; he believed he + simplified the thing by lessening the number of his gods, but he achieved + nothing by this towards attaining to the truth; in recurring from cause to + cause man finished by losing sight of every thing; in this obscurity, in + this dark abyss, his mind still laboured, he formed new chimeras, he made + new gods, or rather he formed a very complex machinery; still, as before, + whenever he could not account for any phenomenon that struck his sight, he + was unwilling to ascribe it to physical causes; and the name of his + Divinity, whatever that might happen to be, was always brought in to + supply his own ignorance of natural causes. + </p> + <p> + If a faithful account was rendered of man's ideas upon the Divinity, he + would be obliged to acknowledge, that for the most part the word <i>Gods</i> + has been used to express the concealed, remote, unknown causes of the + effects he witnessed; that he applies this term when the spring of + natural, the source of known causes ceases to be visible: as soon as he + loses the thread of these causes, or as soon as his mind can no longer + follow the chain, he solves the difficulty, terminates his research, by + ascribing it to his gods; thus giving a vague definition to an unknown + cause, at which either his idleness, or his limited knowledge, obliges him + to stop. When, therefore, he ascribes to his gods the production of some + phenomenon, the novelty or the extent of which strikes him with wonder, + but of which his ignorance precludes him from unravelling the true cause, + or which he believes the natural powers with which he is acquainted are + inadequate to bring forth; does he, in fact, do any thing more than + substitute for the darkness of his own mind, a sound to which he has been + accustomed to listen with reverential awe? Ignorance may be said to be the + inheritance of the generality of men; these attribute to their gods not + only those uncommon effects that burst upon their senses with an + astounding force, but also the most simple events, the causes of which are + the most easy to be known to whoever shall be willing to meditate upon + them. In short, man has always respected those unknown causes, those + surprising effects which his ignorance prevented him from fathoming. + </p> + <p> + But does this afford us one single, correct idea of the <i>Divinity</i>? + Can it be possible we are acting rationally, thus eternally to make him + the agent of our stupidity, of our sloth, of our want of information on + natural causes? Do we, in fact, pay any kind of adoration to this being, + by thus bringing him forth on every trifling occasion, to solve the + difficulties ignorance throws in our way? Of whatever nature this great + cause of causes may be, it is evident to the slightest reflection that he + has been sedulous to conceal himself from our view; that he has rendered + it impossible for us to have the least acquaintance with him, except + through the medium of nature, which he has unquestionably rendered + competent to every thing: this is the rich banquet spread before man; he + is invited to partake, with a welcome he has no right to dispute; to enjoy + therefore is to obey; to be happy is to render that worship which must + make him most acceptable; <i>to be happy himself is to make others happy; + to make others happy is to be virtuous; to be virtuous he must revere + truth: to know what truth is, he must examine with caution, scrutinize + with severity, every opinion he adopts:</i> this granted, is it at all + consistent with the majesty of the Divinity, is it not insulting to such a + being to clothe him with our wayward passions; to ascribe to him designs + similar to our narrow view of things; to give him our filthy desires; to + suppose he can be guided by our finite conceptions; to bring him on a + level with frail humanity, by investing him with our qualities, however + much we may exaggerate them; to indulge an opinion that he can either act + or think as we do; to imagine he can in any manner resemble such a feeble + play-thing, as is the greatest, the most distinguished man? No! it is to + degrade him in the eye of reason; to violate every regard for truth; to + set moral decency at defiance; to fall back into the depth of cimmerian + darkness. Let man therefore sit down cheerfully to the feast; let him + contentedly partake of what he finds; but let him not worry the Divinity + with his useless prayers, with his shallow-sighted requests, to solicit at + his hands that which, if granted, would in all probability be the most + injurious for himself; these supplications are, in fact, at once to say, + that with our limited experience, with our slender knowledge, we better + understand what is suitable to our condition, what is convenient to our + welfare, than the mighty <i>Cause of all causes</i> who has left us in the + hands of nature: it is to be presumptuous in the highest degree of + presumption; it is impiously to endeavour to lift up a veil which it is + evidently forbidden man to touch; that even his most strenuous efforts + attempt in vain. + </p> + <p> + It remains, then, to inquire, if man can reasonably flatter himself with + obtaining a perfect knowledge of the power of nature; of the properties of + the beings she contains; of the effects which may result from their + various combinations? Do we know why the magnet attracts iron? Are we + better acquainted with the cause of polar attraction? Are we in a + condition to explain the phenomena of light, electricity, elasticity? Do + we understand the mechanism by which that modification of our brain, which + we tall volition, puts our arm or our legs into motion? Can we render to + ourselves an account of the manner in which our eyes behold objects, in + which our ears receive sounds, in which our mind conceives ideas? All we + know upon these subjects is, that they are so. If then we are incapable of + accounting for the most ordinary phenomena, which nature daily exhibits to + us, by what chain of reasoning do we refuse to her the power of producing + other effects equally incomprehensible to us? Shall we be more instructed, + when every time we behold an effect of which we are not in a capacity to + develope the cause, we may idly say, this effect is produced by the power, + by the will of God? Undoubtedly it is the great <i>Cause of causes</i> + must have produced every thing; but is it not lessening the true dignity + of the Divinity, to introduce him as interfering in every operation of + nature; nay, in every action of so insignificant a creature as man? As a + mere agent executing his own eternal, immutable laws; when experience, + when reflection, when the evidence of all we contemplate, warrants the + idea, that this ineffable being has rendered nature competent to every + effect, by giving her those irrevocable laws, that eternal, unchangeable + system, according to which all the beings she contains must eternally act? + Is it not more worthy the exalted mind of the GREAT PARENT OF PARENTS, <i>ens + entium</i>, more consistent with truth, to suppose that his wisdom in + giving these immutable, these eternal laws to the macrocosm, foresaw every + thing that could possibly be requisite for the happiness of the beings + contained in it; that therefore he left it to the invariable operation of + a system, which never can produce any effect that is not the best possible + that circumstances however viewed will admit: that consequently the + natural activity of the human mind, which is itself the result of this + eternal action, was purposely given to man, that he might endeavour to + fathom, that he might strive to unravel, that he might seek out the + concatenation of these laws, in order to furnish remedies against the + evils produced by ignorance. How many discoveries in the great science of + natural philosophy has mankind progressively made, which the ignorant + prejudices of our forefathers on their first announcement considered as + impious, as displeasing to the Divinity, as heretical profanations, which + could only be expiated by the sacrifice of the enquiring individuals; to + whose labour their posterity owes such an infinity of gratitude? Even in + modern days we have seen a SOCRATES destroyed, a GALLILEO condemned, + whilst multitudes of other benefactors to mankind have been held in + contempt by their uninformed cotemporaries, for those very researches into + nature which the present generation hold in the highest veneration. <i>Whenever + ignorant priests are permitted to guide the opinions of nations, science + can make but a very slender progress:</i> natural discoveries will be + always held inimical to the interest of bigotted superstitious men. It + may, to the minds of infatuated mortals, to the shallow comprehension of + prejudiced beings, appear very pious to reply on every occasion our gods + do this, our gods do that; but to the contemplative philosopher, to the + man of reason, to the real adorers of the great <i>Cause of causes</i>, it + will never be convincing, that a sound, a mere word, can attach the reason + of things; can have more than a fixed sense; can suffice to explain + problems. The word GOD is for the most part used to denote the + impenetrable cause of those effects which astonish mankind; which man is + not competent to explain. But is not this wilful idleness? Is it not + inconsistent with our nature? Is it not being truly impious, to sit down + with those fine faculties we have received, and give the answer of a child + to every thing we do not understand; or rather which our own sloth, or our + own want of industry has prevented us from knowing? Ought we not rather to + redouble our efforts to penetrate the cause of those phenomena which + strike our mind? Is not this, in fact, the duty we owe to the great, the + universal Parent? When we have given this answer, what have we said? + nothing but what every one knows. Could the great <i>Cause of causes</i> + make the whole, without also making its part? But does it of necessity + follow that he executes every trifling operation, when he has so noble an + agent as his own nature, whose laws he has rendered unchangeable, whose + scale of operations can never deviate from the eternal routine he has + marked out for her and all the beings she embraces? Whose secrets, if + sought out, contain the true balsam of life—the sovereign remedy for + all the diseases of man. + </p> + <p> + When we shall be ingenuous with ourselves, we shall be obliged to agree + that it was uniformly the ignorance in which our ancestors were involved, + their want of knowledge of natural causes, their unenlightened ideas on + the powers of nature, which gave birth to the gods they worshipped; that + it is, again, the impossibility which the greater part of mankind find to + withdraw, themselves out of this ignorance, the difficulty they + consequently find to form to themselves simple ideas of the formation of + things, the labour that is required to discover the true sources of those + events, which they either admire or fear, that makes them believe these + ideas are necessary to enable them to render an account of those + phenomena, to which their own sluggishness renders them incompetent to + recur. Here, without doubt, is the reason they treat all those as + irrational who do not see the necessity of admitting an unknown agent, or + some secret energy, which for want of being acquainted with Nature, they + have placed out of herself. + </p> + <p> + The phenomena of nature necessarily breed various sentiments in man: some + he thinks favorable to him, some prejudicial, while the whole is only what + it can be. Some excite his love, his admiration, his gratitude; others + fill him with trouble, cause aversion, drive him to despair. According to + the various sensations he experiences, he either loves or fears the causes + to which he attributes the effects, which produce in him these different + passions: these sentiments are commensurate with the effects he + experiences; his admiration is enhanced, his fears are augmented, in the + same ratio as the phenomena which strikes his senses are more or less + extensive, more or less irresistible or interesting to him. Man + necessarily makes himself the centre of nature; indeed he can only judge + of things, as he is himself affected by them; he can only love that which + he thinks favorable to his being; he hates, he fears every thing which + causes him to suffer: in short, as we have seen in the former volume, he + calls confusion every thing that deranges the economy of his machine; he + believes all is in order, as soon as he experiences nothing but what is + suitable to his peculiar mode of existence. By a necessary consequence of + these ideas, man firmly believes that the entire of nature was made for + him alone; that it was only himself which she had in view in all her + works; or rather that the powerful cause to which this nature was + subordinate, had only for object man and his convenience, in all the + stupendous effects which are produced in the universe. + </p> + <p> + If there existed on this earth other thinking beings besides man, they + would fall exactly into similar prejudices with himself; it is a sentiment + founded upon that predilection which each individual necessarily has for + himself; a predilection that will subsist until reason, aided by + experience, in pointing out the truth, shall have rectified his errors. + </p> + <p> + Thus, whenever man is contented, whenever every thing is in order with + respect to himself, he either admires or loves the causes to which he + believes he is indebted for his welfare; when he becomes discontented with + his mode of existence, he either fears or hates the cause which he + supposes has produced these afflicting effects. But his welfare confounds + itself with his existence; it ceases to make itself felt when it has + become habitual, when it has been of long continuance; he then thinks it + is inherrent to his essence; he concludes from it that he is formed to be + always happy; he finds it natural that every thing should concur to the + maintenance of his being. It is by no means the same when he experiences a + mode of existence that is displeasing to himself: the man who suffers is + quite astonished at the change which his taken place in his machine; he + judges it to be contrary to the entire of nature, because it is + incommodious to his own particular nature; he, imagines those events by + which he is wounded, to be contrary to the order of things; he believes + that nature is deranged every time she does not procure for him that mode + of feeling which is suitable to his ideas: he concludes from these + suppositions that nature, or rather that the agent who moves her; is + irritated against him. + </p> + <p> + It is thus that man, almost insensible to good, feels evil in a very + lively manner; the first he believes natural, the other he thinks opposed + to nature. He is either ignorant, or forgets, that he constitutes part of + a whole, formed by the assemblage of substances, of which some are + analogous, others heterogeneous; that the various beings of which nature + is composed, are endowed with a variety of properties, by virtue of which + they act diversely on the bodies who find themselves within the sphere of + their action; that some have an aptitude to attraction, whilst it is of + the essence of others to repel; that even those bodies that attract at one + distance, repel at another; that the peculiar attractions and repulsions + of the particles of bodies perpetually oppose, invariably counteract the + general ones of the masses of matter: he does not perceive that these + beings, as destitute of goodness, as devoid of malice, act only according + to their respective essences; follow the laws their properties impose upon + them; without being in capacity to act otherwise than they do. It is, + therefore, for want of being acquainted with these things, that he looks + upon the great Author of nature, the great <i>Cause of causes</i>, as the + immediate cause of those evils to which he is submitted; that he judges + erroneously when he imagines that the Divinity is exasperated against him. + </p> + <p> + The fact is, man believes that his welfare is a debt due to him from + nature; that when he suffers evil she does him an injustice; fully + persuaded that this nature was made solely for himself, he cannot conceive + she would make him, who is her lord paramount, suffer, if she was not + moved thereto by a power who is inimical to his happiness; who has reasons + with which he is unacquainted for afflicting, who has motives which he + wishes to discover, for punishing him. From hence it will be obvious, that + evil, much more than good, is the true motive of those researches which + man has made concerning the Divinity—of those ideas which he has + formed to himself—of the conduct he has held towards him. The + admiration of the works of nature, or the acknowledgement of its goodness, + seem never alone to have determined the human species to recur painfully + by thought to the source of these things; familiarized at once with all + those effects which are favourable to his existence, he does not by any + means give himself the same trouble to seek the causes, that he does to + discover those which disquiet him, or by which he is afflicted. Thus, in + reflecting upon the Divinity, it was generally upon the cause of his evils + that man meditated; his meditations were fruitless, because the evil he + experiences, as well as the good he partakes, are equally necessary + effects of natural causes, to which his mind ought rather to have bent its + force, than to have invented fictitious causes of which he never could + form to himself any but false ideas; seeing that he always borrowed them, + from his own peculiar mariner of existing, acting, and feeling. + Obstinately refusing to see any thing, but himself, he never became + acquainted with that universal nature of which he constitutes such a very + feeble part. + </p> + <p> + The slightest reflection, however, would have been sufficient to undeceive + him on these erroneous ideas. Everything tends to prove that good and evil + are modes of existence that depend upon causes by which a man is moved; + that a sensible being is obliged to experience them. In a nature composed + of a multitude of beings infinitely varied, the shock occasioned by the + collision of discordant matter must necessarily disturb the order, derange + the mode of existence of those beings who have no analogy with them: these + act in every thing they do after certain laws, which are in themselves + immutable; the good or evil, therefore, which man experiences, are + necessary consequences of the qualities inherent to the beings, within + whose sphere of action he is found. Our birth, which we call a benefit, is + an effect as necessary as our death, which we contemplate as an injustice + of fate: it is of the nature of all analogous beings to unite themselves + to form a whole: it is of the nature of all compound beings to be + destroyed, or to dissolve themselves; some maintain their union for a + longer period than others; some disperse very quickly, as the ephemeron; + some endure for ages, as the planets; every being in dissolving itself + gives birth to new beings; these are destroyed in their turn; to execute + the eternal, the immutable laws of a nature that only exists by the + continual changes that all its parts undergo. Thus nature cannot be + accused of malice, since every thing that takes place in it is necessary—is + produced by an invariable system, to which every other being, as well as + herself, is eternally subjected. The same igneous matter that in man is + the principle of life, frequently becomes the principle of his + destruction, either by the conflagration of a city, the explosion of a + volcano, or his mad passion for war. The aqueous fluid that circulates + through his machine, so essentially necessary to his actual existence, + frequently becomes too abundant, and terminates him by suffocation; is the + cause of those inundations which sometimes swallow up both the earth and + its inhabitants. The air, without which he is not able to respire, is the + cause of those hurricanes, of those tempests, which frequently render + useless the labour of mortals. These elements are obliged to burst their + bonds, when they are combined in a certain manner; their necessary but + fatal consequences are those ravages, those contagions, those famines, + those diseases, those various scourges, against which man, with streaming + eyes and violent emotions, vainly implores the aid of those powers who are + deaf to his cries: his prayers are never granted; but the same necessity + which afflicted him, the same immutable laws which overwhelmed him with + trouble, replaces things in the order he finds suitable to his species: a + relative order of things which was, is, and always will be the only + standard of his judgment. + </p> + <p> + Man, however, made no such simple reflections: he either did not or would + not perceive that every thing in nature acted by invariable laws; he + continued stedfast in contemplating the good of which he was partaker, as + a favor; in considering the evil he experienced, as a sign of anger in + this nature, which he supposed to be animated by the same passions as + himself or at least that it was governed by secret agents, who acted after + his own manner, who obliged it to execute their will, that was sometimes + favourable, sometimes inimical to the human species. It was to these + supposed agents, with whom in the sunshine of his prosperity he was but + little occupied, that in the bosom of his calamity he addressed his + prayers; he thanked them, however, for their favours, fearing lest their + ingratitude might farther provoke their fury: thus when assailed by + disaster, when afflicted with disease, he invoked them with fervor: he + required them to change in his favor the mode of acting which was the very + essence of beings; he was willing that to make the slightest evil he + experienced cease, that the eternal chain of things might be broken; and + the unerring, undeviating course of nature might he arrested. + </p> + <p> + It was upon such ridiculous pretensions, that were founded those + supplications, those fervent prayers, which mortals, almost always + discontented with their fate, never in accord in their respective desires, + addressed to their gods. They were unceasingly upon their knees before the + altars, were ever prostrate before the power of the beings, whom they + judged had the right of commanding nature; who they supposed to have + sufficient energy to divert her course; who they considered to possess the + means to make her subservient to their particular views; thus each hoped + by presents, by humiliation, to induce them to oblige this nature, to + satisfy the discordant desires of their race. The sick man, expiring in + his bed, asks that the humours accumulated in his body should in an + instant lose those properties which renders them injurious to his + existence; that by an act of their puissance, his gods should renew or + recreate the springs of a machine worn out by infirmities. The cultivator + of a low swampy country, makes complaint of the abundance of rain with + which his fields are inundated; whilst the inhabitant of the hill, raises + his thanks for the favors he receives, solicits a continuance of that + which causes the despair of his neighbour. In this, each is willing to + have a god for himself, and asks according to his momentary caprices, to + his fluctuating wants, that the invariable essence of things, should be + continually changed in his favour. + </p> + <p> + From this it must be obvious, that man every moment asks a <i>miracle</i> + to be wrought in his support. It is not, therefore, at all surprising that + he displayed such ready credulity, that he adopted with such facility the + relation of the marvellous deeds which were universally announced to him + as the acts of the power, or the effects of the benevolence, of the + various gods which presided over the nations of the earth: these wonderful + tales, which were offered to his acceptance, as the most indubitable + proofs of the empire of these gods over nature, which man always found + deaf to his entreaties, were readily accredited by him; in the + expectation, that if he could gain them over to his interest, this nature, + which he found so sullen, so little disposed to lend herself to his views, + would then be controuled in his own favor. + </p> + <p> + By a necessary consequence of these ideas, nature was despoiled of all + power; she was contemplated only as a passive instrument, who acted at the + will, under the influence of the numerous, all-powerful agents to whom the + various superstitions had rendered her subordinate. It was thus for want + of contemplating nature under her true point of view, that man has + mistaken her entirely, that he believed her incapable of producing any + thing by herself; that he ascribed the honor of all those productions, + whether advantageous or disadvantageous to the human species, to + fictitious powers, whom he always clothed with his own peculiar + dispositions, only he aggrandized their force. In short, it was upon the + ruins of nature, that man erected the imaginary colossus of superstition, + that he reared the <i>altars of a Jupiter, the temples of an Apollo</i>. + </p> + <p> + If the ignorance of nature gave birth to such a variety of gods, the + knowledge of this nature is calculated to destroy them. As soon as man + becomes enlightened, his powers augment, his resources increase in a ratio + with his knowledge; the sciences, the protecting arts, industrious + application, furnish him assistance; experience encourages his progress, + truth procures for him the means of resisting the efforts of many causes, + which cease to alarm him as soon as he obtains a correct knowledge of + them. In a word, his terrors dissipate in proportion as his mind becomes + enlightened, because his trepidation is ever commensurate with his + ignorance, and furnishes this great lesson, that <i>man, instructed by + truth, ceases to be superstitious</i>. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0004" id="link2H_4_0004"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. II. + </h2> + <h3> + <i>Of Mythology, and Theology</i>. + </h3> + <p> + The elements of nature were, as we have shewn, the first divinities of + man; he has generally commenced with adoring material beings; each + individual, as we have already said, as may be still seen in savage + nations, made to himself a particular god, of some physical object, which + he supposed to be the cause of those events, in which he was himself + interested; he never wandered to seek out of visible nature, the source + either of what happened to himself, or of those phenomena to which he was + a witness. As he every where saw only material effects, he attributed them + to causes of the same genus; incapable in his infancy of those profound + reveries, of those subtle speculations, which are the fruit of time, the + result of leisure, he did not imagine any cause distinguished from the + objects that met his sight, nor of any essence totally different from + every thing he beheld. + </p> + <p> + The observation of nature was the first study of those who had leisure to + meditate: they could not avoid being struck with the phenomena of the + visible world. The rising and setting of the sun, the periodical return of + the seasons, the variations of the atmosphere, the fertility and sterility + of the earth, the advantages of irrigation, the damage caused by floods, + the useful effects of fire, the terrible consequences of conflagration, + were proper and suitable objects to occupy their thoughts. It was natural + for them to believe that those beings they saw move of themselves, acted + by their own peculiar energies; according as their influence over the + inhabitants of the earth was either favorable or otherwise, they concluded + them to have either the power to injure them, or the disposition to confer + benefits. Those who first acquired the knowledge of gaining an ascendancy + over man, then savage, wandering, unpolished, or dispersed in woods, with + but little attachment to the soil, of which he had not yet learned to reap + the advantage, were always more practised observers—individuals more + instructed in the ways of nature, than the people, or rather the scattered + hordes, whom they found ignorant and destitute of experience: their + superior knowledge placed them in a capacity to render these services—to + discover to them useful inventions, which attracted the confidence of the + unhappy beings to whom they came to offer an assisting hand; savages who + were naked, half famished, exposed to the injuries of the weather, + obnoxious to the attacks of ferocious beasts, dispersed in caverns, + scattered in forests, occupied with hunting, painfully labouring to + procure themselves a very precarious subsistence, had not sufficient + leisure to make discoveries calculated to facilitate their labour, or to + render it less incessant. These discoveries are generally the fruit of + society: isolated beings, detached families, hardly ever make any + discoveries—scarcely ever think of making any. The savage is a being + who lives in a perpetual state of infancy, who never reaches maturity + unless some one comes to draw him out of his misery. At first repulsive, + unsociable, intractable, he by degrees familiarizes himself with those who + render him service; once gained by their kindness, he readily lends them + his confidence; in the end he goes the length of sacrificing to them his + liberty. + </p> + <p> + It was commonly from the bosom of civilized nations that have issued those + personages who have carried sociability, agriculture, art, laws, gods, + superstition, forms of worship, to those families or hordes as yet + scattered; who united them either to the body of some other nations, or + formed them into new nations, of which they themselves became the leaders, + sometimes the king, frequently the high priest, and often their god. These + softened their manners—gathered them together—taught them to + reap the advantages of their own powers—to render each other + reciprocal assistance—to satisfy their wants with greater facility. + In thus rendering their existence more comfortable, thus augmenting their + happiness, they attracted their love; obtained their veneration, acquired + the right of prescribing opinions to them, made them adopt such as they + had either invented themselves, or else drawn up in the civilized + countries from whence they came. History points out to us the most famous + legislators as men, who, enriched with useful knowledge they had gleaned + in the bosom of polished nations, carried to savages without industry, + needing assistance, those arts, of which, until then, these rude people + were ignorant: such were the Bacchus's, the Orpheus's, the Triptolemus's, + the Numa's, the Zamolixis's; in short, all those who first gave to nations + their gods—their worship—the rudiments of agriculture, of + science, of superstition, of jurisprudence, of religion, &c. + </p> + <p> + It will perhaps be enquired, If those nations which at the present day we + see assembled, were all originally dispersed? We reply, that this + dispersion may have been produced at various times, by those terrible + revolutions, of which it has before been remarked our globe has more than + once been the theatre; in times so remote, that history has not been able + to transmit us the detail. Perhaps the approach of more than one comet may + have produced on our earth several universal ravages, which have at each + time annihilated the greater portion of the human species. + </p> + <p> + These hypotheses will unquestionably appear bold to those who have not + sufficiently meditated on nature, but to the philosophic enquirer they are + by no means inconsistent. There may not only have been one general deluge, + but even a great number since the existence of our planet; this globe + itself may have been a new production in nature; it may not always have + occupied the place it does at present. Whatever idea may be adopted on + this subject, if it is very certain that, independent of those exterior + causes, which are competent to totally change its face, as the impulse of + a comet may do, this globe contains within itself, a cause adequate to + alter it entirely, since, besides the diurnal and sensible motion of the + earth, it has one extremely slow, almost imperceptible, by which every + thing must eventually be changed in it: this is the motion from whence + depends the <i>precession</i> of the <i>equinoctial points</i>, observed + by <i>Hipparchus</i> and other mathematicians, now well understood by + astronomers; by this motion, the earth must at the end of several thousand + years change totally: this motion will at length cause the ocean to occupy + that space which at present forms the lands or continents. From this it + will be obvious that our globe, as well as all the beings in nature, has a + continual disposition to change. This motion was known to the ancients, + and was what gave rise to what they called their great year, which the + Egyptians fixed at thirty-six thousand five hundred and twenty-five years: + the Sabines at thirty-six thousand four hundred and twenty-five, whilst + others have extended it to one hundred thousand, some even to seven + hundred and fifty-three thousand years. Again, to those general + revolutions which our planet has at different times experienced, way he + added those that have been partial, such as inundations of the sea, + earthquakes, subterraneous conflagrations, which have sometimes had the + effect of dispersing particular nations, and to make them forget all those + sciences with which they were, before acquainted. It is also probable that + the first volcanic fires, having had no previous vent, were more central, + and greater in quantity, before they burst the crust of earth; as the sea + washed the whole, it must have rapidly sunk down into every opening, + where, falling on the boiling lava, it was instantly expanded into steam, + producing irresistible explosion: whence it is reasonable to conclude, + that the primaeval earthquakes wore more widely extended, and of much + greater force, than those which occur in our days. Other vapours may be + produced by intense heat, possessing a much greater elasticity, from + substances that evaporate, such as mercury, diamonds, &c.; the + expansive force of these vapours would be much greater than the steam of + water, even at red hot heat consequently they, way have had sufficient + energy to raise islands, continents, or even to have detached the moon + from the earth; if the moon, as has been supposed by some philosophers, + was thrown out of the great cavity which now contains the South Sea; the + immense quantity of water flowing in from the original ocean, and which + then covered the earth, would much contribute to leave the continents and + islands, which might be raised at the same time, above the surface of the + water. In later days we have accounts of huge stones falling, from the + firmament, which may have been thrown by explosion from some distant + earthquake, without having been impelled with a force sufficient to cause + them to circulate round the earth, and thus produce numerous small moons + or satellites. + </p> + <p> + Those who were able to escape from the ruin of the world, filled with + consternation, plunged in misery, were but little conditioned to preserve + to their posterity a knowledge, effaced by those misfortunes, of which + they had been both the victims and the witnesses: overwhelmed with dismay, + trembling with fear, they were not able to hand down the history of their + frightful adventures, except by obscure traditions; much less to transmit + to us the opinions, the systems, the arts, the sciences, anterior to these + petrifying revolutions of our sphere. There have been perhaps men upon the + earth from all eternity; but at different periods they may have been + nearly annihilated, together with their monuments, their sciences, and + their arts; those who outlived these periodical revolutions, each time + formed a new race of men, who by dint of time, labour, and experience, + have by degrees withdrawn from oblivion the inventions of the primitive + races. It is, perhaps, to these periodical revolutions of the human + species, that is to be ascribed the profound ignorance in which we see man + yet plunged, upon those objects that are the most interesting to him. This + is, perhaps, the true source of the imperfection of his knowledge—of + the vices of his political institutions—of the defect in his + religion—of the growth of superstition, over which terror has always + presided; here, in all probability, is the cause of that puerile + inexperience, of those jejune prejudices, which almost every where keep + man in a state of infancy, and which render him so little capable of + either listening to reason or of consulting truth. To judge by the + slowness of his progress, by the feebleness of his advance, in a number of + respects, we should be inclined to say, the human race has either just + quitted its cradle, or that he was never destined to attain the age of + virility—to corroborate his reason. + </p> + <p> + However it may be with these conjectures, whether the human race may + always have existed upon the earth, whether it may have been a recent + production of nature, whether the larger animals we now behold were + originally derived from the smallest microscopic ones, who have increased + in bulk with the progression of time, or whether, as the Egyptian + philosophers thought, mankind were originally hermaphrodites, who like the + <i>aphis</i> produced the sexual distinction after some generations, which + was also the opinion of Plato, and seems to have been that of Moses, who + was educated amongst these Egyptians, as may be gathered from the 27th and + 28th verses of the first chapter of GENESIS: "So God created man in his + own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he + them—And GOD blessed them, and GOD said unto them, be fruitful, and + multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over + the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living + thing that moveth upon the earth:" it is not therefore presuming too much + to suppose, as the Egyptians were a nation very fond of explaining their + opinions by hieroglyphics, that that part which describes Eve as taken out + of Adam's rib, was an hieroglyphic emblem: showing that mankind was in the + primitive state of both sexes, united, who was afterwards divided into + males and females. However, I say, this may be, it is extremely easy to + recur to the origin of many existing nations: we shall find them always in + the savage state; that is, to say, dispersed; composed of families + detached from each other; of wandering, hordes; these were collected + together, approximated at the voice of some missionary or legislator, from + whom they received great benefits, who gave them gods, opinions, and laws. + These personages, of whom the people newly congregated readily + acknowledged the superiority, fixed the national gods, leaving to each + individual, those which he had formed to himself, according to his own + peculiar ideas, or else substituting others brought from those regions, + from whence they themselves had emigrated. + </p> + <p> + The better to imprint their lessons on the minds of their new subjects, + these men became the guides, the priests, the sovereigns, the masters of + these infant societies; they formed discourses by which they spoke to the + imagination of their willing auditors. POETRY seem best adapted to strike + the mind of these rude people, to engrave on their memory those ideas with + which they were willing to imbue them: its images, its fictions, its + numbers, its rhyme its harmony, all conspired to please their fancy, to + render permanent the impressions it made: thus, the entire of nature, as + well as all its parts, was personified, by its beautiful allegories: at + its soothing voice, trees, stones, rocks, earth, air, fire, water, by + imagination took intelligence, held conversation with man, and with + themselves; the elements were deified by its songs, every thing was + figuratively detailed in harmonious lays. The sky, which according to the + then philosophy, was an arched concave, spreading over the earth, which + was supposed to be a level plain; (for the doctrine of <i>antipodes</i> is + of rather modern date) was itself made a god; was considered a more + suitable residence, as making a greater distinction for these imaginary + deities than the earth on which man himself resided. Thus the firmament + was filled with deities. + </p> + <p> + Time, under the name of Saturn, was pictured as the son of heaven; or + Coelus by earth, called Terra, or Thea; he was represented as an + inexorable divinity—naturally artful, who devoured his own children—who + revenged the anger of his mother upon his father; for which purpose she + armed him with a scythe, formed of metals drawn from her own bowels, with + which he struck Coelus, in the act of uniting himself to Thea, and so + mutilated him, that he was ever after incapacitated to increase the number + of his children: he was said to have divided the throne with Janus king of + Italy, his reign seems to have been so mild, so beneficent, that it was + called the <i>golden age</i>; human victims were sacrificed on his altars, + until abolished by Hercules, who substituted small images of clay. + Festivals in honor of this god, called Saturnalia, were instituted long + antecedent to the foundation of Rome they were celebrated about the middle + of December, either on the 16th, 17th, or 18th; they lasted in latter + times several days, originally but one. Universal liberty prevailed at the + celebration, slaves were permitted to ridicule their masters—to + speak freely on every subject—no criminals were executed—war + never declared; the priests made their human offerings with their heads + uncovered; a circumstance peculiar to the Saturnalia, not adopted at other + festivals. + </p> + <p> + The igneous matter, the etherial electric fluid, that invisible fire which + vivifies nature, that penetrates all beings, that fertilizes the earth, + which is the great principle of motion, the source of heat, was deified + under the name of Jupiter: his combination with every being in nature was + expressed by his metamorphoses—by the frequent adulteries imputed to + him. He was armed with thunder, to indicate he produced meteors, to typify + the electric fluid that is called lightning. He married the winds, which + were designated under the name of Juno, therefore called the Goddess of + the Winds, their nuptials were celebrated with great solemnity; all the + gods, the entire brute creation, the whole of mankind attended, except one + young woman named Chelone, who laughed at the ceremonies, for which + impiety she was changed by Mercury into a tortoise, and condemned to + perpetual silence. He was the most powerful of all the gods, and + considered as the king and father both of gods and men: his worship was + very extended, performed with greater solemnity, than that of any other + god. Upon his altars smoked goats, sheep, and white bulls, in which he is + said to have particularly delighted; the oak was rendered sacred to him, + because he taught mankind to live upon acorns; he had many oracles where + his precepts were delivered, the most celebrated of these were at Dodona + and Ammon in Lybia; he was supposed to be invisible to the inhabitants of + the earth; the Lacedemonians erected his statue with four heads, thereby + indicating, that he listened readily to the solicitations of every quarter + of the earth. Minerva is represented as having no mother, but to have come + completely armed from his brains, when his head was opened by Vulcan; by + which it is meant to infer that wisdom is the result of this ethereal + fluid. Thus, following the same fictions, the sun, that beneficent star + which has such a marked influence over the earth, became an Osiris, a + Belus, a Mithras, an Adonis, an Apollo. Nature, rendered sorrowful by his + periodical absence, was an Isis, an Astarte, a Venus, a Cybele. Astarte + had a magnificent temple at Hieropolis served by three hundred priests, + who were always employed in offering sacrifices. The priests of Cybele, + called Corybantes, also Galli, were not admitted to their sacred functions + without previous mutilation. In the celebration of their festivals these + priests used all kinds of indecent expressions, beat drums, cymbals, and + behaved just like madmen: his worship extended all over Phrygia, and was + established in Greece under the name of <i>Eleusinian mysteries</i>. In + short, every thing was personified: the sea was under the empire of + Neptune; fire was adored by the Egyptians under the name of Serapis; by + the Persians, under that of Ormus or Oromaze; and by the Romans, under + that of Vesta and Vulcan. + </p> + <p> + Such was the origin of mythology: it may be said to be the daughter of + natural philosophy, embellished by poetry; only destined to describe + nature and its parts. If antiquity is consulted, it will be perceived + without much trouble, that these famous sages, those legislators, those + priests, those conquerors, who were the instructors of infant nations, + themselves adored active nature, or the great whole considered relatively + to its different operations or qualities; that this was what they caused + the ignorant savages whom they had gathered together to adore. It was the + great whole they deified; it was its various parts which they made their + inferior gods; it was from the necessity of her laws they made fate. The + Greeks called it Nature, a divinity who had a thousand names. Varro says, + "I believe that God is the soul of the universe, and that the universe is + God." Cicero says "that in the mysteries of Samothracia, of Lemnos, of + Eleusis, it was nature much more than the gods, they explained to the + initiated." Pliny says, "we must believe that the world, or that which is + contained under the vast extent of the heavens, is the Divinity; even + eternal, infinite, without beginning or end." It was these different modes + of considering nature that gave birth to Polytheism, to idolatry. Allegory + masqued its mode of action: it was at length parts of this great whole, + that idolatry represented by statues and symbols. + </p> + <p> + To complete the proofs of what has been said; to shew distinctly that it + was the great whole, the universe, the nature of things, which was the + real object of the worship of Pagan antiquity, hardly any thing can be + more decisive than the beginning of the hymn of Orpheus addressed to the + god Pan. + </p> + <p> + "O Pan! I invoke thee, O powerful god! O universal nature! the heavens, + the sea, the earth, who nourish all, and the eternal fire, because these + are thy members, O all powerful Pan," &c. Nothing can be more suitable + to confirm these ideas, than the ingenious explanation which is given of + the fable of Pan, as well as of the figure under which he is represented. + It is said, "Pan, according to the signification of his name, is the + emblem by which the ancients have designated the great assemblage of + things or beings: he represents the universe; and, in the mind of the + wisest philosophers of antiquity, he passed for the greatest and most + ancient of the gods. The features under which he is delineated form the + portrait of nature, and of the savage state in which she was found in the + beginning. The spotted skin of the leopard, which serves him for a mantle, + imagined the heavens filled with stars and constellations. His person was + compounded of parts, some of which were suitable to a reasonable animal, + that is to say, to man; and others to the animal destitute of reason, such + as the goat. It is thus," says he, "that the universe is composed of an + intelligence that governs the whole, and of the prolific, fruitful + elements of fire, water, earth, air. Pan, loved to drink and to follow the + nymphs; this announces the occasion nature has for humidity in all her + productions, and that this god, like nature, is strongly inclined to + propagation. According to the Egyptians, and the most ancient Grecian + philosophers, Pan had neither father nor mother; he came out of Demogorgon + at the same moment with the Destinies, his fatal sisters; a fine method of + expressing that the universe was the work of an unknown power, and that it + was formed after the invariable relations, the eternal laws of necessity; + but his most significant symbol, that most suitable to express the harmony + of the universe, is his mysterious pipe, composed of seven unequal tubes, + but calculated to produce the nicest, the most perfect concord. The orbs + which compose the seven planets of our solar system, are of different + diameters; being bodies of unequal mass, they describe their revolutions + round the sun in various periods; nevertheless it is from the order of + their motion that results the harmony of the spheres," &c. + </p> + <p> + Here then is the great macrocosm, the mighty whole, the assemblage of + things adored and deified by the philosophers of antiquity; whilst the + uninformed stopped at the emblem under which this nature was depicted; at + the symbols under which its various parts, its numerous functions were + personified; his narrow mind, his barbarous ignorance, never permitted him + to mount higher; they alone were deemed worthy of being, initiated into + the mysteries, who knew the realities masqued under these emblems. Indeed, + it is not to be doubted for an instant, that the wisest among the Pagans + adored nature; which ethnic theology designated under a great variety of + nomenclature, under an immense number of different emblems. Apuleius, + although a decided Platonist, accustomed to the mysterious, unintelligible + notions of his master, calls "Nature the parent of all; the mother of the + elements, the first offspring of the world;" again, "the mother of the + stars, the parent of the seasons, and the governess of the whole world."—She + was worshipped by many under the appellation of the <i>mother of the gods</i>. + Indeed, the first institutors of nations, and their immediate successors + in authority, only spoke to the people by fables, allegories, enigmas, of + which they reserved to themselves the right of giving an explanation: + this, in fact, constituted the mysteries of the various worship paid to + the Pagan divinities. This mysterious tone they considered necessary, + whether it was to mask their own ignorance, or whether it was to preserve + their power over the uninformed, who for the most part only respect that + which is above their comprehension. Their explications were generally + dictated either by interest, or by a delirious imagination, frequently by + imposture; thus from age to age, they did no more than render nature and + its parts, which they had originally depicted, more unknown, until they + completely lost sight of the primitive ideas; these were replaced by a + multitude of fictitious personages, under whose features this nature had + primarily been represented to them. The people, either unaccustomed to + think, or deeply steeped in ignorance, adored these personages, without + penetrating into the true sense of the emblematical fables recounted to + them. These ideal beings, with material figures, in whom they believed + there resided a mysterious virtue, a divine power, were the objects of + their worship, the source of their fears, the fountain of their hopes. The + wonderful, the incredible actions ascribed to these fancied divinities, + were an inexhaustible fund of admiration, which gave perpetual play to the + fancy; which delighted not only the people of those days, but even the + children of latter ages. Thus were transmitted from age to age, those + marvellous accounts, which, although necessary to the existence of the + power usurped by the ministers of these gods, did, in fact, nothing more + than confirm the blindness of the ignorant: these never supposed that it + was nature, its various operations, its numerous component parts—that + it was the passions of man and his diverse faculties that lay buried under + an heap of allegories; they did not perceive that the passions and + faculties of human nature were used as emblems, because man was ignorant + of the true cause of the phenomena he beheld. As strong passions seemed to + hurry man along, in despite of himself, they either attributed these + passions to a god, or deified them; frequently they did both: it was thus + love became a deity; that eloquence, poetry, industry, were transformed + into gods, under the names of Hermes, Mercury, Apollo; the stings of + conscience were called the Furies: the people, bowed down in stupid + ignorance, had no eyes but for these emblematical persons, under which + nature was masked: they attributed to their influence the good, to their + displeasure the evil, which they experienced: they entered into every kind + of folly, into the most delirious acts of madness, to render them + propitious to their views; thus, for want of being acquainted with the + reality of things, their worship frequently degenerated into the most + cruel extravagance, into the most ridiculous folly. + </p> + <p> + Thus it is obvious, that every thing proves nature and its various parts + to have every where been the first divinities of man. Natural philosophers + studied these deities, either superficially or profoundly,—explained + some of their properties, detailed some of their modes of action. Poets + painted them to the imagination of mortals, either in the most fascinating + colours, or under the most hideous deformities; embodied them—furnished + them with reasoning faculties—recounted their exploits—recorded + their will. The statuary executed sometimes with the most enrapturing art, + the ideas of the poets,—gave substance to their shadows—form + to their airy nothings. The priest decorated these united works with a + thousand marvellous qualities—with the most terrible passions—with + the most inconceivable attributes; gave them, "a local habitation and a + name." The people adored them; prostrated themselves before these gods, + who were neither susceptible of love or hatred, goodness, or malice; they + became persecuting, malevolent, cruel, unjust, in order to render + themselves acceptable to powers generally described to them under the most + odious features. + </p> + <p> + By dint of reasoning upon these emblems, by meditating upon nature, thus + decorated, or rather disfigured, subsequent speculators no longer + recollected the source from whence their predecessors had drawn their + gods, nor the fantastic ornaments with which they had embellished them. + Natural philosophers and poets were transformed by leisure into + metaphysicians and theologians; tired with contemplating what they could + have understood, they believed they had made an important discovery by + subtilly distinguishing nature from herself—from her own peculiar + energies—from her faculty of action. By degrees they made an + incomprehensible being of this energy, which as before they personified, + this they called the mover of nature, divided it into two, one congenial + to man's happiness, the other inimical to his welfare; these they deified + in the same manner as they had before done nature with her various parts. + These abstract, metaphysical beings, became the sole object of their + thoughts; were the subject of their continual contemplation; they looked + upon them as realities of the highest importance: thus nature quite + disappeared; she was despoiled of her rights; she was considered as + nothing more than an unwieldy mass, destitute of power; devoid of energy, + as an heap of ignoble matter purely passive: who, incapable of acting by + herself, was not competent to any of the operations they beheld, without + the direct, the immediate agency of the moving powers they had associated + with her: which they had made the fulcrum necessary to the action of the + lever. They either did not or would not perceive, that the <i>great Cause + of causes, ens entium, Parent of parents</i>, had, in unravelling chaotic + matter, with a wisdom for which man can never be sufficiently grateful, + with a sagacity which he can never sufficiently admire, foreseen every + thing that could contribute not only to his own individual happiness, but + also to that of all the beings in nature; that he had given this nature + immutable laws, according to which she is for ever regulated; after which + she is obliged invariably to act; that he has described for her an eternal + course, from which it is not permitted her to deviate, even for an + instant; that she is therefore, rendered competent to the production of + every phenomena, not only that he beholds, but of an infinity that he has + never yet contemplated; that she needs not any exterior energy for this + purpose, having received her powers from a hand far superior to any the + feeble weak imagination of man is able to form; that when this nature + appears to afflict him, it is only from the contraction of his own views, + from the narrowness of his own ideas, that he judges; that, in fact, what + he considers the evils of nature, are the greatest possible benefits he + can receive, if he was but in a condition to be acquainted with previous + causes, with subsequent effects. That the evils resulting to him from his + own vices, have equally their remedies in this nature, which it is his + duty to study; which if he does he will find, that the same omnipotent + goodness, who gave her irrefragable laws, also planted in her bosom, + balsams for all his maladies, whether physical or moral: but that it is + not given him to know what this great, this universal cause is, for + purposes of which he ought not to dispute the wisdom, when he contemplates + the mighty wonders that surround him. + </p> + <p> + Thus man ever preferred an unknown power, to that of which he was enabled + to have some knowledge, if he had only deigned to consult his experience; + but he presently ceases to respect that which he understands; to estimate + those objects which are familiar to him: he figures to himself something + marvellous in every thing he does not comprehend; his mind, above all, + labours to seize upon that which appears to escape his consideration; in + default of experience, he no longer consults any thing, but his + imagination, which feeds him with chimeras. In consequence, those + speculators who have subtilly distinguished nature from her own powers, + have successively laboured to clothe the powers thus separated with, a + thousand incomprehensible qualities: as they did not see this power, which + is only a mode, they made it a spirit—an intelligence—an + incorporeal being; that is to say, of a substance totally different from + every thing of which we have a knowledge. They never perceived that all + their inventions, that all the words which they imagined, only served to + mask their real ignorance; that all their pretended science was limited to + saying, in what manner nature acted, by a thousand subterfuges which they + themselves found it impossible to comprehend. Man always deceives himself + for want of studying nature; he leads himself astray, every time he is + disposed to go out of it; he is always quickly necessitated to return; he + is even in error when he substitutes words which he does not himself + understand, for things which he would much better comprehend if he was + willing to look at them without prejudice. + </p> + <p> + Can a theologian ingenuously believe himself more enlightened, for having + substituted the vague words spirit, incorporeal substance, &c. to the + more intelligible terms nature, matter, mobility, necessity? However this + may be, these obscure words once imagined, it was necessary to attach + ideas to them; in doing this, he has not been able to draw them from any + other source than the beings of this despised nature, which are ever the + only beings of which he is enabled to have any knowledge. Man, + consequently, drew them up in himself; his own soul served for the model + of the universal soul, of which indeed according to some it only formed a + portion; his own mind was the standard of the mind that regulated nature; + his own passions, his own desires, were the prototypes of those by which + he actuated this being; his own intelligence was that from which he formed + that of the mover of nature; that which was suitable to himself, he called + the order of nature; this pretended order was the scale by which he + measured the wisdom of this being; in short, those qualities which he + calls perfections in himself, were the archetypes in miniature, of the + perfections of the being, he thus gratuitously supposed to be the agent, + who operated the phenomena of nature. It was thus, that in despite of all + their efforts, the theologians were, perhaps always will be, true + Anthropomorphites. A sect of this denomination appeared in 359, in Egypt, + they held the doctrine that their god had a bodily shape. Indeed it is + very difficult, if not impossible to prevent man from making himself the + sole model of his divinity. Montaigne says "man is not able to be other + than he is, nor imagine but after his capacity; let him take what pains he + may, he will never have a knowledge of any soul but his own." Xenophanes + said, "if the ox or the elephant understood either sculpture or painting, + they would not fail to represent the divinity under their own peculiar + figure that in this, they would have as much reason as Polyclitus or + Phidias, who gave him the human form." It was said to a very celebrated + man that "God made man after his own image;" "man has returned the + compliment," replied the philosopher. Indeed, man generally sees in his + God, nothing but a man. Let him subtilize as he will, let him extend his + own powers as he may, let him swell his own perfections to the utmost, he + will have done nothing more than make a gigantic, exaggerated man, whom he + will render illusory by dint of heaping together incompatible qualities. + He will never see in such a god, but a being of the human species, in whom + he will strive to aggrandize the proportions, until he has formed a being + totally inconceivable. It is according to these dispositions that he + attributes intelligence, wisdom, goodness, justice, science, power, to his + divinity, because he is himself intelligent; because he has the idea of + wisdom in some beings of his own species; because he loves to find in them + ideas favourable to himself: because he esteems those who display equity; + because he has a knowledge, which he holds more extensive in some + individuals than himself; in short, because he enjoys certain faculties + which depend on his own organization. He presently extends or exaggerates + all these qualities in forming his god; the sight of the phenomena of + nature, which he feels he is himself incapable of either producing or + imitating, obliges him to make this difference between the being he + pourtrays and himself; but he knows not at what point to stop; he fears + lest he should deceive himself, if he should see any limits to the + qualities he assigns, the word infinite, therefore, is the abstract, the + vague term which he uses to characterize them. He says that his power is + infinite, which signifies that when he beholds those stupendous effects + which nature produces, he has no conception at what point his power can + rest; that his goodness, his wisdom, his knowledge are infinite: this + announces that he is ignorant how far these perfections ma be carried in a + being whose power so much surpasses his own; that he is of infinite + duration, because he is not capable of conceiving he could have had a + beginning or can ever cease to be; because of this he considers a defect + in those transitory beings of whom he beholds the dissolution, whom he + sees are subjected to death. He presumes the cause of those effects to + which he is a witness, of those striking phenomena that assail his sight, + is immutable, permanent, not subjected to change, like all the evanescent + beings whom he knows are submitted to dissolution, to destruction, to + change of form. This mover of nature being always invisible to man, his + mode of action being, impenetrable, he believes that, like his soul or the + concealed principle which animates his own body, which he calls spiritual, + a spirit, is the moving power of the universe; in consequence he makes a + spirit the soul, the life, the principle of motion in nature. Thus when by + dint of subtilizing, he has arrived at believing the principle by which + his body is moved is a spiritual, immaterial substance, he makes the + spirit of the universe immaterial in like manner: he makes it immense, + although without extent; immoveable, although capable of moving nature: + immutable, although he supposes him to be the author of all the changes, + operated in the universe. + </p> + <p> + The idea of the unity of God, which cost Socrates his life, because the + Athenians considered those Atheists who believed but in one, was the tardy + fruit of human meditation. Plato himself did not dare to break entirely + the doctrine of <i>Polytheism</i>; he preserved Venus, an all-powerful + Jupiter, and a Pallas, who was the goddess of the country. The sight of + those opposite, frequently contradictory effects, which man saw take place + in the world, had a tendency to persuade him there must be a number of + distinct powers or causes independent of each other. He was unable to + conceive that the various phenomena he beheld, sprung from a single, from + an unique cause; he therefore admitted many causes or gods, acting upon + different principles; some of which he considered friendly, others as + inimical to his race. Such is the origin of that doctrine, so ancient, so + universal, which supposed two principles in nature, or two powers of + opposite interests, who were perpetually at war with each other; by the + assistance of which he explained, that constant mixture of good and evil, + that blending of prosperity with misfortune, in a word, those eternal + vicissitudes to which in this world the human being, is subjected. This is + the source of those combats which all antiquity has supposed to exist + between good and wicked gods, between an Osiris and a Typhoeus; between an + Orosmadis and an Arimanis; between a Jupiter and the Titanes; in these + rencounters man for his own peculiar interest always gave the palm of + victory to the beneficent deity; this, according to all the traditions + handed down, ever remained in possession of the field of battle; it was so + far right, as it is evidently for the benefit of mankind that the good + should prevail over the wicked. + </p> + <p> + When, however, man acknowledged only one God, he generally supposed the + different departments of nature were confided to powers subordinate to his + supreme orders, under whom the sovereign of the gods discharged his care + in the administration of the world. These subaltern gods were prodigiously + multiplied; each man, each town, each country, had their local, their + tutelary gods; every event, whether fortunate or unfortunate, had a divine + cause; was the consequence of a sovereign decree; each natural effect, + every operation of nature, each passion, depended upon a divinity, which a + theological imagination, disposed to see gods every where, mistaking + nature, either embellished or disfigured. Poetry tuned its harmonious + lays, on these occasions, exaggerated the details, animated its pictures; + credulous ignorance received the portraits with eagerness—heard the + doctrines with submission. + </p> + <p> + Such is the origin of Polytheism: indeed the Greek word <i>Theos</i>, + [Greek letters], is derived from <i>Theaomai</i>, [Greek letters], which + implies to contemplate, or take a view of secret or hidden things. Such + are the foundations, such the titles of the hierarchy, which man + established between himself and his gods, because he generally believed he + was incapable of the exalted privilege of immediately addressing himself + to the incomprehensible Being whom he had acknowledged for the only + sovereign of nature, without even having any distinct idea on the subject: + such is the true genealogy of those inferior gods whom the uninformed + place as, a proportional means between themselves and the first of all + other causes. In consequence, among the Greeks and the Romans, we see the + deities divided into two classes, the one were called great gods, because + the whole world were nearly in accord in deifying the most striking parts + of nature, such as the sun, fire; the sea, time, &c. these formed a + kind of aristocratic order, who were distinguished from the minor gods, or + from the multitude of ethnic divinities, who were entirely local; that is + to say, were reverenced only in particular countries, or by individuals; + as in Rome, where every citizen had his familiar spirit, called lares; and + household god, called penates. Nevertheless, the first rank of these Pagan + divinities, like the latter, were submitted to Fate, that is, to destiny, + which obviously is nothing more than nature acting by immutable, rigorous, + necessary laws; this destiny was looked upon as the god of gods; it is + evident, that this was nothing more than necessity personified; that + therefore it was a weakness in the heathens to fatigue with their + sacrifices, to solicit with their prayers, those divinities whom they + themselves believed were submitted to the decrees of an inexorable + destiny, of which it was never possible for them to alter the mandates. <i>But + man</i>, generally, <i>ceases to reason, whenever his theological notions + are either brought into question, or are the subject of his inquiry</i>. + </p> + <p> + What has been already said, serves to show the common source of that + multitude of intermediate powers, subordinate to the gods, but superior to + man, with which he filled the universe: they were venerated under the + names of nymphs, demi-gods, angels, daemons, good and evil genii, spirits, + heroes, saints, &c. Among the Romans they were called <i>Dei medioxumi</i>, + intermediate angels; they were looked upon as intercessors, as mediators, + as powers whom it was necessary to reverence, in order either to obtain + their favour, appease their anger, or divert their malignant intentions; + these constitute different classes of intermediate divinities, who became + either the foundation of their hopes, the object of their fears, the means + of consolation, or the source of dread to those very mortals who only + invented them when they found it impossible to form to themselves + distinct, perspicuous ideas of the incomprehensible Being who governed the + world in chief; or when they despaired of being able to hold communication + with him directly. + </p> + <p> + Meditation and reflection diminished the number of those deities which + composed the ethnic polytheism: some who gave the subject more + consideration than others, reduced the whole to one all-powerful Jupiter; + but still they painted this being in the most hideous colours, gave him + the most revolting features, because they were still obstinately bent on + making man, his action and his passions, the model: this folly led them + into continual perplexities, because it heaped together contradictory, + incompatible, extravagant qualities; it was quite natural it should do so: + the limited views, the superficial knowledge, the irregular desires of + frail, feeble mortals, were but little calculated to typify the mind of + the real Divinity; of that great <i>Cause of causes</i>, that <i>Parent of + parents</i>, from whom every thing must have emanated. Although they + persuaded themselves it was sinning to give him rivals, yet they described + him as a jealous monarch who could not bear a division of empire; thus + taking the vanity of earthly princes for their emblem, as if it was + possible such a being could have a competitor like a terrestrial monarch. + Not having contemplated the immutable laws with which he has invested + nature, to which every thing it contains is subjected, which are the + result of the most perfect wisdom, they were puzzled to account for the + contrariety of those effects which their weak minds led them to suppose as + evils; seeing that sometimes those who fulfilled in the most faithful + manner their duties in this life, were involved in the same ruin with the + boldest, the most inconsiderate violaters: thus in making him the + immediate agent, instead of the first author, the executive instead of the + formative power, they caused him to appear capricious, as unreasonably + vindictive against his creatures, when they ought to have known that his + wisdom was unlimited, his kindness without bounds, when he infused into + nature that power which produces these apparently contradictory effects; + which, although they seem injurious to man's interests, are, if he was but + capacitated to judge fairly, the most beneficial advantages that he can + possibly derive. Thus they made the Divinity appear improvident, by + continually employing him to destroy the work of his own hands: they, in + fact, taxed him with impotence, by the perpetual non-performance of those + projects of which their own imbecillity, their own erring judgment, had + vainly supposed him to be the contriver. + </p> + <p> + To solve these difficulties, man created enemies to the Divinity, who + although subordinate to the supreme God, were nevertheless competent to + disturb his empire, to frustrate his views. Can any thing be worse + conceived, can any thing be more truly derogatory to the great <i>Parent + of parents</i>, than thus to make him resemble a king, who is surrounded + with adversaries, willing to dispute with him his diadem? Such, however, + is the origin of the <i>Fable of the Titanes</i>, or of the <i>rebellious + angels</i>, whose presumption caused them to be plunged into the abyss of + misery—who were changed into <i>demons</i>, or into evil genii: + these according to their mythology, had no other functions, than to render + abortive the projects of the Divinity; to seduce, to raise to rebellion, + those who were his subjects. Miserable invention, feeble subterfuge, for + the vices of mankind, although decorated with all the beauty of language. + Can then sublimity of versification, the harmony of numbers, reconcile man + to the idea that the puny offspring of natural causes is adequate for a + single instant to dispute the commands, to thwart the desires, to render + nugatory the decrees of a Being whose wisdom is of the most polished + perfection; whose goodness is boundless; whose power must be more + capacious than the human mind can possibly conceive? + </p> + <p> + In consequence of this <i>Fable of the Titanes</i>, the monarch of nature + was represented as perpetually in a scuffle with the enemies he had + himself created; as unwilling totally to subdue those with whom these + fabulists have described him as dividing his authority—partaking his + supreme power. This again was borrowed from the conduct of earthly + monarchs, who, when they find a potent enemy, make a treaty with him; but + this was quite unnecessary for the great <i>Cause of causes</i>; and only + shows that man is utterly incapable of forming any other ideas than those + which he derives from the situation of those of his own race, or of the + beings by whom he is surrounded. According to this fable the subjects of + the universal Monarch were never properly submitted to his authority; like + an earthly king, he was in a continual state of hostility, and punished + those who had the misfortune to enter into the conspiracies of the enemies + of his glory: seeing that human legislators put forth laws, issued + decrees, they established similar institutions for the Divinity; + established oracles; his ministers pretended, through these mysterious + mediums, to convey to the people his heavenly mandates, to unveil his + concealed intentions: the ignorant multitude received these without + examination, they did not perceive that it was man, and not the Divinity, + who thus spoke to them; they did not feel that it must be impossible for + weak creatures to act contrary to the will of God. + </p> + <p> + The <i>Fable of the Titanes, or rebellious angels</i>, is extremely + ancient; very generally diffused over the world; it serves for the + foundation of the theology of the Brachmins of Hindostan: according to + these, all living bodies are animated by <i>fallen angels</i>, who under + these forms expiate their rebellion. These contradictory notions were the + basis of nearly all the superstitions of the world; by these means they + imagined they accounted for the origin of evil—demonstrated the + cause why the human species experience misery. In short, the conduct of + the most arbitrary tyrants of the earth was but too frequently brought + forth, too often acted upon, in forming the character of the Divinity, + held forth to the worship of man: their imperfect jurisprudence was the + source from whence they drew that which they ascribed to their god. Pagan + theology was remarkable for displaying in the character of their + divinities the most dissolute vices; for making them vindictive; for + causing them to punish with extreme rigour those, crimes which the oracles + predicted; to doom to the most lasting torments those who sinned without + knowing their transgression; to hurl vengeance on those who were ignorant + of their obscure will, delivered in language which set comprehension at + defiance; unless it was by the priest who both made and fulminated it. It + was upon these unreasonable notions, that the theologians founded the + worship which man ought to render to the Divinity. Do not then let us be + at all surprised if the superstitious man was in a state of continual + alarm: if he experienced trances—if his mind was ever in the most + tormenting dread; the idea of his gods recalled to him unceasingly, that + of a pitiless tyrant who sported with the miseries of his subjects; who, + without being conscious of their own wrong, might at each moment incur his + displeasure: he could not avoid feeling that although they had formed the + universe entirely for man, yet justice did not regulate the actions of + these powerful beings, or rather those of the priests; but he also + believed that their elevated rank placed them infinitely above the human + species, that therefore they might afflict him at their pleasure. + </p> + <p> + It is then for want of considering good and evil as equally necessary; it + is for want of attributing them to their true causes, that man has created + to himself fictitious powers, malicious divinities, respecting whom it is + found so difficult to undeceive him. Nevertheless, in contemplating + nature, he would have been able to have perceived, that <i>physical evil</i> + is a necessary consequence of the peculiar properties of some beings; he + would have acknowledged that plague, contagion, disease, are due to + physical causes under particular circumstances; to combinations, which, + although extremely natural, are fatal to his species; he would have sought—in + the bosom of nature herself the remedies suitable to diminish these evils, + or to have caused the cessation of those effects under which he suffered: + he would have seen in like manner that <i>moral evil</i> was the necessary + consequence of defective institutions; that it was not to the Divinity, + but to the injustice of his fellows he ought to ascribe those wars, that + poverty, those famines, those reverses of fortune, those multitudinous + calamities, those vices, those crimes, under which he so frequently + groans. Thus to rid himself of these evils he would not have uselessly + extended his trembling hands towards shadows incapable of relieving him; + towards beings who were not the authors of his sorrows; he would have + sought remedies for these misfortunes in a more rational administration of + justice—in more equitable laws—in more I reasonable + institutions—in a greater degree of benevolence towards his fellow + man—in a more punctual performance of his own duties. + </p> + <p> + As these gods were generally depicted to man as implacable to his + frailties as they denounced nothing but the most dreadful punishments + against those who involuntarily offended, it is not at all surprising that + the sentiment of fear prevailed over that of love: the gloomy ideas + presented to his mind were calculated to make him tremble, without making + him better; an attention to this truth will serve to explain the + foundation of that fantastical, irrational, frequently cruel worship, + which was paid to these divinities; he often committed the most cruel + extravagancies against his own person, the most hideous crimes against the + person of others, under the idea that in so doing, he disarmed the anger, + appeased the justice, recalled the clemency, deserved the mercy of his + gods. + </p> + <p> + In general, the superstitious systems of man, his human and other + sacrifices, his prayers, his ceremonies, his customs; have had only for + their object either to divert the fury of his gods, whom he believed he + had offended; to render them propitious to his own selfish views; or to + excite in them that good disposition towards himself, which his own + perverse mode of thinking made him imagine they bestowed exclusively on + others: on the other hand, the efforts, the subtilties of theology, have + seldom had any other end, than to reconcile in the divinities it has + pourtrayed, those discordant ideas which its own dogmas has raised in the + minds of mortals. From what has preceded, it may fairly be concluded that + ethnic theology undermined itself by its own inconsistencies; that the art + of composing chimeras may therefore with great justice be defined to be + that of combining those qualities which are impossible to be reconciled + with each other. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0005" id="link2H_4_0005"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. III. + </h2> + <h3> + <i>Of the confused and contradictory Ideas of Theology.</i> + </h3> + <p> + Every thing that has been said, proves pretty clearly, that, in despite of + all his efforts, man has never been able to prevent himself from drawing + together from his own peculiar nature, the qualities he has assigned to + the Being who governs the universe. The contradictions necessarily + resulting from the incompatible assemblage of these human qualities, which + cannot become suitable to the same subject, seeing that the existence of + one destroys the existence of the other, have been shewn:—the + theologians themselves have felt the insurmountable difficulties which + their divinities presented to reason: they were so substantive, that as + they felt the impossibility of withdrawing themselves out of the dilemma, + they endeavoured to prevent man from reasoning, by throwing his mind into + confusion—by continually augmenting the perplexity of those ideas, + already so discordant, which they offered him of the gods. By these means + they enveloped them in mystery, covered them with dense clouds, rendered + them inaccessible to mankind: thus they themselves became the + interpreters, the masters of explaining, according either to their fancy + or their interest, the ways of those enigmatical beings they made him + adore. For this purpose they exaggerated them more and more—neither + time nor space, nor the entire of nature could contain their immensity—every + thing became an impenetrable mystery. Although man has originally borrowed + from himself the traits, the colours, the primitive lineaments of which he + composed his gods; although he has made them jealous, powerful, vindictive + monarchs, yet his theology, by force of dreaming, entirely lost sight of + human nature. In order to render his divinities still more different from + their creatures, it assigned them, over and above the usual qualities of + man, properties so marvellous, so uncommon, so far removed from every + thing of which his mind could form a conception, that he lost sight of + them himself. From thence he persuaded himself these qualities were + divine, because he could no longer comprehend them; he believed them + worthy of his gods, because no man could figure to himself any one + distinct idea of them. Thus theology obtained the point of persuading man + he must believe that which he could not conceive; that he must receive + with submission improbable systems; that he must adopt, with pious + deference, conjectures contrary to his reason; that this reason itself was + the most agreeable sacrifice he could make on the altars of his gods, who + were unwilling he should use the gift they had bestowed upon him. In + short, it had made mortals implicitly believe that they were not formed to + comprehend the thing of all others the most important to themselves. Thus + it is evident that superstition founded its basis upon the absurd + principle that man is obliged to accredit firmly that which he is in the + most complete impossibility of comprehending. On the other hand, man + persuaded himself that the gigantic, the truly incomprehensible attributes + which were assigned to these celestial monarchs, placed between them and + their slaves a distance so immense, that these could not be by any means + offended with the comparison; that these distinctions rendered them still + greater; made them more powerful, more marvellous, more inaccessible to + observation. Man always entertains the idea, that what he is not in a + condition to conceive, is much more noble, much wore respectable, than + that which he has the capacity to comprehend. The more a thing is removed + from his reach, the more valuable it always appears. + </p> + <p> + These prejudices in man for the marvellous, appear to have been the source + that gave birth to those wonderful, unintelligible qualities with which + superstition clothed these divinities. The invincible ignorance of the + human mind, whose fears reduced him to despair, engendered those obscure, + vague notions, with which mythology decorated its gods. He believed he + could never displease them, provided he rendered them incommensurable; + impossible to be compared with any thing, of which he had a knowledge; + either with that which was most sublime, or that which possessed the + greatest magnitude, From hence the multitude of negative attributes with + which ingenious dreamers have successively embellished their phantoms, to + the end that they might more surely form a being distinguished from all + others, or which possessed nothing in common with that which the human + mind had the faculty of being acquainted with: they did not perceive that + after all their endeavours, it was nothing wore than exaggerated human + qualities, which they thus heaped together, with no more skill than a + painter would display who should delineate all the members of the body of + the same size, taking a giant for dimension. + </p> + <p> + The theological attributes with which metaphysicians decorated these + divinities, were in fact nothing but pure negations of the qualities found + in man, or in those beings of which he has a knowledge; by these + attributes their gods were supposed exempted from every thing which they + considered weakness or imperfection in him, or in the beings by whom he is + surrounded: they called every quality infinite, which has been shewn is + only to affirm, that unlike man, or the beings with whom he is acquainted, + it is not circumscribed by the limits of space; this, however, is what he + can never in any manner comprehend, because he is himself finite. Hobbes + in his <i>Leviathan</i>, says, "whatsoever we imagine is finite. Therefore + there is no idea, or conception of any thing we call infinite. No man can + have in his mind an image of infinite magnitude, nor conceive infinite + swiftness, infinite time, infinite force, or infinite power. When we say + any thing is infinite, we signify only, that we are not able to conceive + the ends and bound of the thing named, having no conception of the thing, + but of our own inability." Sherlock says, "the word infinite is only a + negation, which signifies that which has neither end, nor limits, nor + extent, and, consequently, that which has no positive and determinate + nature, and is therefore nothing;" he adds, "that nothing but custom has + caused this word to be adopted, which without that, would appear devoid of + sense, and a contradiction." + </p> + <p> + When it is said these gods are eternal, it signifies they have not had, + like man or like every thing that exists, a beginning, and that they will + never have an end: to say they are immutable, is to say, that unlike + himself or every thing which he sees, they are not subject to change: to + say they are immaterial, is to advance, that their substance or essence is + of a nature not conceivable by himself, but which must from that very + circumstance be totally different from every thing of which he has + cognizance. + </p> + <p> + It is from the confused collection of these negative qualities, that has + resulted the theological gods; those metaphysical wholes of which it is + impossible for man to form to himself any correct idea. In these abstract + beings every thing is infinity,—immensity,— spirituality,—omniscience,—order,—wisdom,—intelligence,— + omnipotence. In combining these vague terms, or these modifications, the + ethnic priests believed they formed something, they extended these + qualities by thought, and they imagined they made gods, whilst they only + composed chimeras. They imagined that these perfections or these qualities + must be suitable to their gods, because they were not suitable to any + thing of which they had a knowledge; they believed that incomprehensible + beings must have inconceivable qualities. These were the materials of + which theology availed itself to compose those inexplicable shadows before + which they commanded the human race to bend the knee. + </p> + <p> + Nevertheless, experience soon proved that beings so vague, so impossible + to be conceived, so incapable of definition, so far removed from every + thing of which man could have any knowledge, were but little calculated to + fix his restless views; his mind requires to be arrested by qualities + which he is capacitated to ascertain; of which he is in a condition to + form a judgment. Thus after it had subtilized these metaphysical gods, + after it had rendered them so different in idea, from every thing that + acts upon the senses, theology found itself under the necessity of again + assimilating them to man, from whom it had so far removed them: it + therefore again made them human by the moral qualities which it assigned + them; it felt that without this it would not be able to persuade mankind + there could possibly exist any relation between him and such vague, + ethereal, fugitive, incommensurable beings; that it would never be + competent to secure for them his adoration. + </p> + <p> + It began to perceive that these marvellous gods were only calculated to + exercise the imagination of some few thinkers, whose minds were accustomed + to labour upon chimerical subjects, or to take words for realities; in + short it found, that for the greater number of the material children of + the earth it was necessary to have gods more analogous to themselves, more + sensible, more known to them. In consequence these divinities were + re-clothed with human qualities; theology never felt the incompatibility + of these qualities with beings it had made essentially different from man, + who consequently could neither have his properties, nor be modified like + himself. It did not see that gods who were immaterial, destitute of + corporeal organs, were neither able to think nor to act as material + beings, whose peculiar organizations render them susceptible of the + qualities, the feelings the will, the virtues, that are found in them. The + necessity it felt to assimilate the gods to their worshippers, to make an + affinity between them, made it pass over without consideration these + palpable contradictions—this want of keeping in their portrait: thus + ethnic theology obstinately continued to unite those incompatible + qualities, that discrepancy of character, which the human mind attempted + in vain either to conceive or to reconcile: according to it, pure spirits + were the movers of the material world; immense beings were enabled to + occupy space, without however excluding nature; immutable deities were the + causes of those continual changes operated in the world: omnipotent beings + did not prevent those evils which were displeasing to them; the sources of + order submitted to confusion: in short, the wonderful properties of these + theological beings every moment contradicted themselves. + </p> + <p> + There is not less discrepancy, less incompatibility, less discordance in + the human perfections, less contradiction in the moral qualities + attributed to them, to the end that man might be enabled to form to + himself some idea of these beings. These were all said to be <i>eminently</i> + possessed by the gods, although they every moment contradicted each other: + by this means they formed a kind of patch-work character, heterogeneous + beings, discrepant phenomena, entirely inconceivable to man, because + nature had never constructed any thing like them, whereby he was enabled + to form a judgment. Man was assured they were eminently good—that it + was visible in all their actions. Now goodness is a known quality, + recognizable in some beings of the human species; this is, above every + other, a property he is desirous to find in all those upon whom he is in a + state of dependence; but he is unable to bestow the title of good on any + among his fellows, except their actions produce on him those effects which + he approves—that he finds in unison with his existence—in + conformity with his own peculiar modes of thinking. It was evident, + according to this reasoning, these ethnic gods did not impress him with + this idea; they were said to be equally the authors of his pleasures, as + of his pains, which were to be either secured or averted by sacrifices: + thus when man suffered by contagion, when he was the victim of shipwreck, + when his country was desolated by war, when he saw whole nations devoured + by rapacious earthquakes, when he was a prey to the keenest sorrows, he at + least was unable to conceive the bounty of those beings. How could he + perceive the beautiful order which they had introduced into the world, + while he groaned under such a multitude of calamities? How was he able to + discern the beneficence of men whom he beheld sporting as it were with his + species? How could he conceive the consistency of those who destroyed that + which he was assured they had taken such pains to establish, solely for + his own peculiar happiness? But had his mind been properly enlightened, + had he been taught to know, that nature, acting by unerring laws, produces + all the phenomena he beholds as a necessary consequence of her primitive + impulse—that like the rest of nature he was himself subjected to the + general operation—that no peculiar exemption had been made in his + behalf—that sacrifices were useless—that the great <i>Parent + of parents</i>, equally mindful of all his creatures, had set in action + with the most consummate wisdom an invariable system, the apparent, casual + evils of which were ever counterbalanced by the resulting good; that + without repining, it was his duty, his interest, to submit; at the same + time to examine with sedulity, to search with earnestness, into the + recesses of this nature for remedies to the sorrows he endured. If he had + been thus instructed, we should never behold him arraigning either the + kindness, the wisdom, or the consistency of the gods; he would neither + have ascribed his sufferings to the malicious interference of inferior + deities, so derogatory to the divine majesty of the <i>Great Cause of + causes</i>, nor would he have taxed with either inconsistency or + unkindness, that nature which cannot act otherwise than she does. Perhaps + of all the ideas that can be infused into the mind of man, none is more + really subversive of his true happiness, none more incompatible with the + reality of things, than that which persuades him he is himself a + privileged being, the king of a nature where every thing is submitted to + laws, the extent of which his finite mind cannot possibly conceive. Even + admitting it should ultimately turn out to be a fact, he has yet no one + positive evidence to justify the assumption; experience, which after all + must always prove the best criterion for his judgment, daily proves, that + in every thing he is subjected, like every other part of nature, to those + invariable decrees from which nothing that he beholds is exempted. + </p> + <p> + Feeble monarch! of whom a grain of sand, some atoms of bile, some + misplaced humours, destroy at once the existence and the reign: yet thou + pretendest every thing was made for thee! Thou desirest that the entire of + nature should be thy domain, and thou canst not even defend thyself from + the slightest of her shocks! Thou makest to thyself a god for thyself + alone; thou supposest that he unceasingly occupieth himself only for thy + peculiar happiness; thou imaginest every thing was made solely for thy + pleasure; and, following up thy presumptuous ideas, thou hast the audacity + to call nature good or bad as thy weak intellect inclines: thou darest to + think that the kindness exhibited towards thee, in common with other + beings, is contradicted by the evil genii thy fancy has created! Dost thou + not see that those beasts which thou supposest submitted to thine empire, + frequently devour thy fellow-creatures; that fire consumeth them; that the + ocean swalloweth them up; that those elements of which thou sometimes + admirest the order, which sometimes thou accusest of confusion, frequently + sweep them off the face of the earth; dost thou not see that all this is + necessarily what it must be; that thou art not in any manner consulted in + any of this phenomena? Indeed, according to thine own ideas, if thou wast + to examine them with care, dost thou not admit that thy gods are the + universal cause of all; that they maintain the whole by the destruction of + its parts. Are they not then according to thyself, the gods of nature—of + the ocean—of rivers—of mountains—of the earth, in which + they occupiest, so very small a space—of all those other globes that + thou seest roll in the regions of space—of those orbs that revolve + round the sun that enlighteneth thee?—Cease, then, obstinately to + persist in beholding nothing but thy sickly self in nature; do not flatter + thyself that the human race, which reneweth itself, which disappeareth + like the leaves on the trees, can absorb all the care, can ingross all the + tenderness of that universal being, who, according to thyself, properly + understood, ruleth the destiny of all things. Submit thyself in silence to + mandates which thy unavailing prayers; can never change; to a wisdom which + thy imbecility cannot fathom; to the unerring shafts of a fate, which + nothing but thine own vanity, aided by thy perverse ignorance, could ever + question, being the best possible good that can befall thee! which if thou + couldst alter, thou wouldst with thy defective judgment render worse! What + is the human race compared to the earth? What is this earth compared to + the sun? What is our sun compared to those myriads of suns which at + immense distances occupy the regions of space? not for the purpose of + diverting thy weak eyes; not with a view to excite thy stupid admiration, + as thou vainly imaginest; since multitudes of them are placed out of the + range of thy visual organs: but to occupy the place which necessity hath + assigned them. Mortal, feeble and vain! restore thyself to thy proper + sphere; acknowledge every where the effect of necessity; recognize in thy + benefits, behold in thy sorrows, the different modes of action of those + various beings endowed with such a variety of properties, which surround + thee; of which the macrocosm is the assemblage; and do not any longer + suppose that this nature, much less its great cause, can possess such + incompatible qualities as would be the result of human views or of + visionary ideas, which have no existence but in thyself. + </p> + <p> + As long as theologians shall continue obstinately bent to make man the + model of their gods; as long ask they shall pertinaciously undertake to + explain the nature of these gods, which they will never be able to do, but + after human ideas, although they may associate the most heterogeneous + properties, the most discrepant functions; so long, I say, experience will + contradict at every moment the beneficent views they, attach to their + divinities; it will be in vain that they call them good: man, reasoning + thus, will never be able to find good but in those objects which impel him + in a manner favourable to his actual mode of existence; he always finds + confusion in that which fills him with grievous sensations; he calls evil + every thing that painfully affects him, even cursorily; those beings that + produce in him two modes of feeling, so very opposite to each other, he + will naturally conclude are sometimes favourable, sometimes unfavourable + to him; at least, if he will not allow that they act necessarily, + consequently are neither one nor the other, he will say that a world where + he experiences so much evil cannot be submitted to men who are perfectly + good; on the other hand, he will also assume that a world in which man + receives so many benefits, cannot be governed by those who are without + kindness. Thus he is obliged to admit of two principles equally powerful, + who are in hostility with each other; or rather, he must agree that the + same persons are alternately kind and unkind; this after all is nothing + more than avowing they cannot be otherwise than they are; in this case it + would be useless to sacrifice to them—to make solicitation; seeing + it would be nothing but <i>destiny</i>—the necessity of things + submitted invariable rules. + </p> + <p> + In order to justify these beings, constructed upon mortal principles, from + injustice, in consequence of the evils the human species experience, the + theologian is reduced to the necessity of calling them punishments + inflicted for the transgressions of man. But then these general calamities + include all men. Some, at least, may be supposed not to have offended. + Thus he involves contradictions he finds it difficult to reconcile; to + effectuate this he makes his <i>anthropomorphites</i> immaterial—incorporeal; + that is, he says they are the negation of every thing of which he has a + knowledge; consequently, beings who can have no relation with corporeal + beings: and this avails him no better, as will be evident by reasoning on + the subject. To offend any one, is to diminish the sum of his happiness; + it is to afflict him, to deprive him of something, to make him experience + a painful sensation. How is it possible man can operate on such beings; + how can the physical actions of a material substance have any influence + over an immaterial substance, devoid of parts, having no point of contact. + How can a corporeal being make an incorporeal being experience + incommodious sensations? On the other hand, <i>justice</i>, according to + the only ideas man can ever form of it, supposes, a permanent disposition + to render to each what is due to him; the theologian will not admit that + the beings he has jumbled together owe any thing to man; he insists that + the benefits they bestow are all the gratuitous effects of their own + goodness; that they have the right to dispose of the work of their hands + according to their own pleasure; to plunge it if they please into the + abyss of misery; in short, that their volition is the only guide of their + conduct. It is easy to see, that according to man's idea of justice, this + does not even contain the shadow of it; that it is, in fact, the mode of + action adopted by what he calls the most frightful tyrants. How then can + he be induced to call men just who act after this manner? Indeed, while he + sees innocence suffering, virtue in tears, crime triumphant, vice + recompensed, and at the same time, is told the beings whom theology has + invented are the authors, he will never be able to acknowledge them to + have <i>justice</i>. But he will find no such contradictory qualities in + nature, where every thing is the result of immutable laws: he will at once + perceive that these transient evils produce more permanent good; that they + are necessary to the conservation of the whole, or else result from + modifications of matter, which it is competent for him to change, by + altering his own mode of action; a lesson that nature herself teaches him + when he is willing to receive her instructions. But to form gods with + human passions, is to make them appear unjust; to say that such beings + chastise their friends for their own I good, is at once to upset all the + ideas he has either of kindness or unkindness: thus the incompatible human + qualities ascribed to these beings, do in fact destroy their existence. If + it be insisted they have the knowledge and power of man, only that they + are more extended, then it becomes a very natural reply, to say, since + they know every thing, they ought at least to restrain mischief; because + this would be the observation of man upon the action of his fellows;—if + it be urged these qualities are similar to the same qualities possessed by + man, then it may be fairly asked in what do they differ? To this, if any + answer be given, be what it may, it will still be only changing the + language: it will be invariably another method of expressing the same + thing; seeing that man with all his ingenuity, will never be able to + describe properties but after himself or those of the beings by whom he is + surrounded. + </p> + <p> + Where is the man filled with kindness, endowed with humanity, who does not + desire with all his heart to render his fellow creatures happy? If these + beings, as the theologians assert, really have man's qualities augmented, + would they not, by the same reasoning, exercise their infinite power to + render them all happy? Nevertheless, in despite of these theologists, we + scarcely find any one who is perfectly satisfied with his condition on + earth: for one mortal that enjoys, we behold a thousand who suffer; for + one rich man who lives in the midst of abundance, there are thousands of + poor who want common necessaries: whole nations groan in indigence, to + satisfy the passions of some avaricious princes, of some few nobles, who + are not thereby rendered more contented—who do not acknowledge + themselves more fortunate on that account. In short, under the dominion of + these beings, the earth is drenched with the tears of the miserable. What + must be the inference from all this? That they are either negligent of, or + incompetent to, his happiness. But the mythologists will tell you coolly, + that the judgments of his gods are impenetrable! How do we understand this + term? Not to be taught—not to be informed—impervious—not + to be pierced: in this case it would be an unreasonable question to + inquire by what authority do you reason upon them? How do you become + acquainted with these impenetrable mysteries? Upon what foundation do you + attribute virtues which you cannot penetrate? What idea do you form to + yourself of a justice that never resembles that of man? Or is it a truth + that you yourself are not a man, but one of those impenetrable beings whom + you say you represent? + </p> + <p> + To withdraw themselves from this, they will affirm that the justice of + these idols are tempered with mercy, with compassion, with goodness: these + again are human qualities: what, therefore, shall we understand by them? + What idea do we attach to mercy? Is it not a derogation from the severe + rules of an exact, a rigorous justice, which causes a remission of some + part of a merited punishment? Here hinges the great incompatibility, the + incongruity of those qualities, especially when augmented by the word <i>omni</i>; + which shews how little suitable human properties are to the formation of + divinities. In a prince, clemency is either a violation of justice, or the + exemption from a too severe law: nevertheless, man approves of clemency in + a sovereign, when its too great facility does not become prejudicial to + society; he esteems it, because it announces humanity, mildness, a + compassionate, noble soul; qualities he prefers in his governors to + rigour, cruelty, inflexibility: besides, human laws are defective; they + are frequently too severe; they are not competent to foresee all the + circumstances of every case: the punishments they decree are not always + commensurate with the offence: he therefore does not always think them + just: but he feels very well, he understands distinctly, that when the + sovereign extends his mercy, he relaxes from his justice—that if + mercy he merited, the punishment ought not to take place—that then + its exercise is no longer clemency, but justice: thus he feels, that in + his fellow creatures these two qualities cannot exist at the same moment. + How then is he to form his judgment of beings who are represented to + possess both in the extremest degree? Is it not, in fact, announcing these + beings to be men like ourselves, who act with our imperfections on an + enlarged scale? + </p> + <p> + They then say, well, but in the next world these idols will reward you for + all the evils you suffer in this: this, indeed, is something to look to, + if it could be contemplated alone; unmixed with all they have formerly + asserted: if we could also find that there was an unison of thinking on + this point—if there was a reasonable comprehensible view of it held + forth: but alas! here again human pleasures, human feelings, are the basis + on which these rewards are rested; only they are promised in a way we + cannot comprehend them; houris, or females who are to remain for ever + virgins, notwithstanding the knowledge of man, are so opposed to all human + comprehension, so opposite to all experience, are such mystic assertions, + that the human mind cannot possibly embrace an idea of them: besides this + is only promised by one class of these beings; others affirm it will be + altogether different: in short, the number of modes in which this + hereafter reward is promised to him, obliges man to ask himself one plain + question, Which is the real history of these blissful abodes? At this + question he staggers—he seeks for advice: each assures him that the + other is in error—that his peculiar mode is that which will really + have place; that to believe the other is a crime. How is he to judge now? + Take what course he will, he runs the chance of being wrong; he has no + standard whereby to measure the correctness of these contradictory + assurances; his mind is held suspended; he feels the impossibility of the + whole being right; he knows not that which he ought to elect! Again, they + have positively asserted these beings owe nothing to man: how then is he + to expect in a future life, a more real happiness than he enjoys in the + present? This they parry, by assuring him it is founded upon their + promises, contained in their revealed oracles. Granted: but is he quite + certain these oracles have emanated from themselves? If they are so + different in their detail, may there not be reasonable ground for + suspecting some of them are not authentic? If there is, which are the + spurious, which are the genuine? By what rule is he to guide himself in + the choice; how, with his frail methods of judging, is he to scrutinize + oracles delivered by such powerful beings—to discriminate the true + from the false? The ministers of each will give you an infallible method, + one that, is according to their own asseveration, cannot err; that is, by + an implicit belief in the particular doctrine each promulgates. + </p> + <p> + Thus will be perceived the multitude of contradictions, the extravagant + hypotheses which these human attributes, with which theology clothes its + divinities, must necessarily produce. Beings embracing at one time so many + discordant qualities will always be undefinable—can only present a + train of ideas calculated to displace each other; they will consequently + ever remain beings of the imagination. These beings, say their ministers, + created the heavens, the earth, the creatures who inhabit it, to manifest + their own peculiar glory; they have neither rivals, nor equals in nature; + nothing which can be compared with them. Glory is, again, a human passion: + it is in man the desire of giving his fellow-creatures an high opinion of + him; this, passion is laudable when it stimulates him to undertake great + projects—when it determines him to perform useful actions—but + it is very frequently a weakness attached to his nature; it is nothing + more than a desire to be distinguished from those beings with whom he + compares himself, without exciting him to one noble, one generous act. It + is easy to perceive that beings who are so much elevated above men, cannot + be actuated by such a defective passion. They say these beings are jealous + of their prerogatives. Jealousy is another human passion, not always of + the most respectable kind: but it is rather difficult to conceive the + existence of jealousy with profound wisdom, unlimited power, and the + perfection of justice. Thus the theologians by dint of heaping quality on + quality, aggrandizing each as is added, seem to have reduced themselves to + the situation of a painter, who spreading all his colours upon his canvas + together, after thus blending them into an unique mass, loses sight of the + whole in the composition. + </p> + <p> + They will, nevertheless, reply to these difficulties, that goodness, + wisdom, justice, are in these beings qualities so pre-eminent, so + distinct, have so little affinity with these same qualities in man, that + they are totally dissimilar—have not the least relation. Admit this + to be the case, How then can he form to himself any idea of these + perfections, seeing they are totally unlike those with which he is + acquainted? They surely cannot mean to insinuate that they are the reverse + of every thing he understands; because that would, in effect, bring them + to a precise point which would not need any explanation; it is therefore a + matter of certainty this cannot be the case: then if these qualities, when + exercised by the beings they have described, are only human actions so + obscured, so hidden, as not to be recognizable by man, How can weak + mortals pretend to announce them, to have a knowledge of them, to explain + them to others? Does then theology impart to the mind the ineffable boon + of enabling it to conceive that which no man is competent to understand? + Does it procure for its agents the marvellous faculty of having distinct + ideas of beings composed of so many contradictory properties? Does it, in + fact, make the theologian himself one of these incomprehensible beings. + </p> + <p> + They will impose silence, by saying the oracles have spoken; that through + these mystical means they have made themselves known to mortals. The next + question would naturally be, When, where, or to whom have these oracles + spoken? Where are these oracles? An hundred voices raise themselves in the + same moment; hands of Briaraeus are immediately stretched forth to shew + them in a number of discordant collections, which each maintains, with an + equal degree of vehemence, is the true code—the only doctrine man + ought to believe: he runs them over, finds they scarcely agree in any one + particular; but that in all the heaviest penalties are denounced against + those who doubt the smallest part of any one of them. These beings of + consummate wisdom are made to speak an obscure, irrational language; some + of them, although their goodness is proclaimed, have been cruel and + sanguinary; others, although their justice is held forth, have been + partial, unjust, capricious; some, who are represented as all merciful, + destine to the most hideous punishments the unhappy victims to their + wrath: examine any one of them more closely, he will find that they have + never in any two countries held literally the same language: that although + they are said to have spoken in many places, that they have always spoken + variously: What is the necessary result? The human mind, incapable of + reconciling such manifest contradictions, unable to obtain from their + ministers any corroborative evidence, that is not disputed by the others, + falls into the strangest perplexity; is involved in doubts, entangled in a + labyrinth to which no clue is to be found. + </p> + <p> + Thus the relations, which are supposed to exist between man and these + theological idols, can only be founded on the moral qualities of these + beings: if these are not known to him, if he cannot in any manner + comprehend them, they cannot by any ingenuity of argument serve him for + models. In order that they may be imitated, it is needful that these + qualities were cognizable by the being who is to imitate them. How can he + imitate that goodness, that justice, that mercy, which does not resemble + either his own, or any thing he can conceive? If these beings partake in + nothing of that which forms man—if the properties they do possess, + although different, are not within the reach of his comprehension—if, + he cannot embrace the most distant idea of them, which the theologian + assures him he cannot, How is it possible he can set about imitating them? + How follow a conduct suitable to please them—to render himself + acceptable in their sight? What can in effect be the motive of that + worship, of that homage, of that obedience, which these beings are said to + exact—which he is informed he should offer at their altars, if he + does not establish it upon their goodness—their veracity—their + justice: in short, upon qualities which he is competent to understand? How + can he have clear, distinct ideas of those qualities, if they are no + longer of the same nature as those which he has learned to reverence in + the beings of his own species? + </p> + <p> + To this they will reply, because none of them ever admit the least doubt + of the rectitude of their own individual creed, that there can be no + proportion between these idols and mortals, who are the work of their + hands; that it is not permitted to the clay to demand of the potter who + has formed it, "why ye have fashioned me thus;"—but if there can be + no common measure between the workman and his work—if there can be + no analogy between them, because the one is immaterial, the other + corporeal, How do they reciprocally act upon each other? How can the gross + organs of the one, comprehend the subtile quality of the other? Reasoning + in the only way he is capable, and it surely will never be seriously + argued that he is not to reason, will he not perceive that the earthen + vase could only have received the form which it pleased the potter to + give; that if it is formed badly, if it is rendered inadequate to the use + for which it was designed, the vase is not in this instance to be blamed; + the potter certainly has the power to break it; the vase cannot prevent + him; it will neither have motives nor means to soften his anger; it will + be obliged to submit to its destiny; but he will not be able to prevent + his mind from thinking the potter harsh in thus punishing the vase, rather + than by forming it anew, by giving it another figure, render it competent + to the purposes he intended. + </p> + <p> + According to these notions the relations between man and these theological + beings have no existence, they owe nothing to him, are dispensed from + shewing him either goodness or justice; that man, on the contrary, owes + them every thing: but contradictions appear at every step. If these have + promised by their oracles any thing to man, it is rather difficult for him + to believe, that what is so solemnly promised does not belong to him if he + fulfils the condition of the promise. The difference a theologian may + choose to find in these relations will hardly be convincing to a + reasonable mind. The duties of man towards these beings can, according to + their own shewing, have no other foundation than the happiness he expects + from them: thus the relation has a reciprocity, it is founded upon their + goodness, upon their justice, it demands obedience on his part, a conduct + suitable to the benefits he receives. Thus, in whatever manner the + theological system is viewed, it destroys itself. Will theology never feel + that the more it endeavours to exaggerate the human qualities, the less it + exalts the beings it pictures; the more incomprehensible it renders them, + the more it contributes to swell its own ocean of contradictions; that to + take human passions, mortal faculties at all, is perhaps the worst means + it can pursue to form a perfect being; but that if it must persist in this + method, then the further they remove them from man, the more they debase + him, the more they weaken the relations subsisting between them: that in + thus aggregating human properties, it should carefully abstain from + associating in these pictures those qualities which man finds detestable + in his fellows. Thus, despotism in man is looked upon as an unjust, + unreasonable power; if it introduces such a quality into its portraits, it + cannot rationally suppose them suitable to cultivate the esteem, to + attract the voluntary homage of the human race: if, however, the canvas be + examined, we shall frequently be struck, with perceiving this the leading + feature; we shall equally find a want of keeping through the whole; that + shadows are introduced, where lights ought to prevail; that the colouring + is incongruous—the design without harmony. + </p> + <p> + The discrepancy of conduct which theology imputes to these idols, is not + less remarkable than the contrariety of qualities it ascribes to them, or + the inconsistency of the passions with which it invests them; sometimes, + according to this, they are the friends to reason, desirous of the + happiness of society; sometimes they are inimical to virtue; interdict the + use of reason; flattered with seeing society disturbed, they sometimes + afflict man without his being able to guess the cause of their + displeasure; sometimes they are favourable to mankind—at others, + indisposed towards the human species: sometimes they are represented as + permitting crimes for the pleasure of punishing them—at others, they + exert all their power to arrest crime in its birth; sometimes they elect a + small number to receive eternal happiness, predestinating the rest to + perpetual misery—to everlasting torments; at others, they throw open + the gates of mercy to all who choose to enter them; sometimes they are + pourtrayed as destroying the universe—at others, as establishing the + most beautiful order in the planet we inhabit; sometimes they are held + forth as countenancing deception—at others, as having the highest + reverence for truth—as holding deceit in abomination. This, again, + is the necessary result of the human faculties, the mortal passions, the + frail qualities of which they compose the beings they hold forth to the + admiration, to the worship, to the homage of the world. + </p> + <p> + Perhaps the most fatal consequences have arisen from founding the moral + character of these divinities upon that of man. Those who first had the + confidence to tell man that in these matters it was not permitted him to + consult his reason, that the interests of society demanded its sacrifice, + evidently proposed to themselves to make him the sport of their own + wantonness—to make him the blind instrument of their own + unworthiness. It is from this radical error that has sprung all those + extravagances which the various superstitions have introduced upon the + earth: from hence has flowed that sacred fury which has frequently deluged + it with blood: here is the cause of those inhuman persecutions which have + so often desolated nations: in short, all those horrid tragedies which + have been acted on the vast theatre of the world, by command of the + different ministers of the various systems, whose gods they have said + ordained these shocking spectacles. + </p> + <p> + The theologians themselves have thus been the means, of calumniating the + gods they pretended to serve, under the pretext of exalting their name—of + covering them with glory; in this they may have been said to be true + atheists, since they seem only to have been anxious to destroy the idols + they themselves had raised, by the actions they have attributed to them—which + has debased them in the eye of reason—rendered their existence more + than doubtful to the man of humanity. Indeed, it would require more than + human credulity to accredit the assertion that these beings ever could + order the atrocities committed in their name. Every time they have been + willing to disturb the harmony of mankind—whenever they have been + desirous to render him unsociable, they have cried out that their gods + ordained that he should be so. Thus they render mortals uncertain, make + the ethical system fluctuate by founding it upon changeable, capricious + idols, whom they represent much more frequently cruel and unjust, than + filled with bounty and benevolence. + </p> + <p> + However it may be, admitting if they will for a moment that their idols + possess all the human virtues in an infinite degree of perfection, we + shall quickly be obliged to acknowledge that they cannot connect them with + those metaphysical, theological, negative attributes, of which we have + already spoken. If these beings are spirits that are immaterial, how can + they be able to act like man, who is a corporeal being? Pure spirits, + according to the only idea man can form of them, having no organs, no + parts, cannot see any thing; can neither hear our prayers, attend to our + solicitations, nor have compassion for our miseries. They cannot be + immutable, if their dispositions can suffer change: they cannot be + infinite, if the totality of nature, without being them, can exist + conjointly with them: they cannot be omnipotent, if they either permit or + do not prevent evil: they cannot be omnipresent, if they are not every + where: they must therefore be in the evil as well as in the good. Thus in + whatever manner they are contemplated, under whatever point of view they + are considered, the human qualities which are assigned to them, + necessarily destroy each other; neither can these same properties in any + possible manner combine themselves with the supernatural attributes given + to them by theology. + </p> + <p> + With respect to the revealed will of these idols, by means of their + oracles, far from being a proof of their good will, of their + commisseration for man, it would rather seem evidence of their ill-will. + It supposes them capable of leaving mankind for a considerable season + unacquainted with truths highly important to their interests; these + oracles communicated to a small number of chosen men, are indicative of + partiality, of predilections, that are but little compatible with the + common Father of the human race. These oracles were ill imagined, since + they tend to injure the immutability ascribed to these idols, by supposing + that they permitted man to be ignorant at one time of their will, whilst + at another time they were willing he should be instructed on the subject. + Moreover, these oracles frequently predicted offences for which afterwards + severe punishments were inflicted on those who did no more than fulfil + them. This, according to the reasoning of man, would be unjust. The + ambiguous language in which they were delivered, the almost impossibility + of comprehending them, the inexplicable mysteries they contained, seemed + to render them doubtful; at least they are not consistent with the ideas + man is capable of forming of infinite perfection: but the fact clearly is, + they were thus rendered capable of application to the contingency of + events—could be made to suit almost any circumstances: this would + render it not a very improbable conjecture, that these oracles were solely + delivered by the priests themselves. It these were tried by the only test + of which he has any knowledge—HIS REASON, it would naturally occur + to the mind of man, that mystery could never, on any occasion, be used in + the promulgation of substantive decrees meant to operate on the obedience, + to actuate the moral conduct of man: it is quite usual with most + legislators to render their laws as explicit as possible, to adapt them to + the meanest understanding; in short, it would be reckoned want of good + faith in a government, to throw a thick, mysterious veil over the + announcement of that conduct which it wished its citizens to adopt; they + would be apt to think such a procedure was either meant to cover its own + peculiar ignorance, or else to entrap them into a snare; at best, it would + be considered as furnishing a never-failing source of dispute, which a + wise government would endeavour to avoid. + </p> + <p> + It will thus be obvious, that the ideas which theology has at various + times, under various systems, held forth to man, have for the most part + been confused, discordant, incompatible, and have had a general tendency + to disturb the repose of mankind. The obscure notions, the vague + speculations of these multiplied creeds, would be matter of great + indifference, if man was not taught to hold them as highly important to + his welfare—if he did not draw from them conclusions pernicious to + himself—if he did not learn from these theologians that he must + sharpen his asperity against those who do not contemplate them in the same + point of view with himself: as he perhaps, then, will never have a common + standard, a fixed rule, a regular graduated scale, whereby to form his + judgment on these points—as all efforts of the imagination must + necessarily assume divers shapes, undergo a variety of modifications, + which can never be assimilated to each other, it was little likely that + mankind would at all times be able to understand each other on this + subject; much less that they would be in accord in the opinions they + should adopt. From hence that diversity of superstitions which in all ages + have given rise to the most irrational disputes; which have engendered the + most sanguinary wars; which have caused the most barbarous massacres; + which have divided man from his fellow by the most rancorous animosities, + that will perhaps never be healed; because he has been impelled to + consider the peculiar tenets he adopted, not only as immediately essential + to his individual welfare, but also as intimately connected with the + happiness, closely interwoven with the tranquillity of the nation of which + he was a citizen. That such contrariety of sentiment, such discrepancy of + opinion should exist, is not in the least surprising; it is, in fact, the + natural result of those physical causes to which, as long as he exists, he + is at all times submitted. The man of a heated imagination cannot + accommodate himself to the god of a phlegmatic, tranquil being: the + infirm, bilious, discontented, angry mortal, cannot view him under the + same aspect as he who enjoys a sounder constitution,—as the + individual of a gay turn, who enjoys the blessing of content, who wishes + to live in peace. An equitable, kind, compassionate, tender-hearted man, + will not delineate to himself the same portrait of his god, as the man who + is of an harsh, unjust, inflexible, wicked character. Each individual will + modify his god after his own peculiar manner of existing, after his own + mode of thinking, according to his particular mode of feeling. A wise, + honest, rational man will always figure to himself his god as humane and + just. + </p> + <p> + Nevertheless, as fear usually presided at the formation of those idols man + set up for the object of his worship; as the ideas of these beings were + generally associated with that of terror as the recollections of + sufferings, which he attributed to them, often made him tremble; + frequently awakened in his mind the most afflicting, reminiscence; as it + sometimes filled him with inquietude, sometimes inflamed his imagination, + sometimes overwhelmed him with dismay, the experience of all ages proves, + that these vague idols became the most important of all considerations—was + the affair which most seriously occupied the human race: that they every + where spread consternation—produced the most frightful ravages, by + the delirious inebriation resulting from the opinions with which they + intoxicated the mind. Indeed, it is extremely difficult to prevent + habitual fear, which of all human passions is the most incommodious, from + becoming a dangerous leaven; which in the long run will sour, exasperate, + and give malignancy to the most moderate temperament. + </p> + <p> + If a misanthrope, in hatred of his race, had formed the project of + throwing man into the greatest perplexity,—if a tyrant, in the + plenitude of his unruly desire to punish, had sought out the most + efficacious means; could either the one or the other have imagined that + which was so well calculated to gratify their revenge, as thus to occupy + him unceasingly with objects not only unknown to him, but which no two of + them should ever see with precisely the same eyes; which notwithstanding + they should be obliged to contemplate as the centre of all their thoughts—as + the only model of their conduct—as the end of all their actions—as + the subject of all their research—as a thing of more importance to + them than life itself; upon which all their present felicity, all their + future happiness, must necessarily depend? Could the gods themselves, in + their solicitude to punish the impious Prometheus, for having stolen fire + from the sun, have imagined a more certain method of executing their + wishes? Was not Pandora's box, though stuffed with evils, trifling when + compared with this? That at least left hope, to the unfortunate + Epimetheus; this effectually cut it off. + </p> + <p> + If man was subjected to an absolute monarch, to a sultan who should keep + himself secluded from his subjects; who followed no rule but his own + desires; who did not feel himself bound by any duty; who could for ever + punish the offences committed against him; whose fury it was easy to + provoke; who was irritated even by the ideas, the thoughts of his + subjects; whose displeasure might be incurred without even their own + knowledge; the name of such a sovereign would assuredly be sufficient to + carry trouble, to spread terror, to diffuse consternation into the very + souls of those who should hear it pronounced; his idea would haunt them + every where—would unceasingly afflict them—would plunge them + into despair. What tortures would not their mind endure to discover this + formidable being, to ascertain the secret of pleasing him! What labour + would not their imagination bestow, to discover what mode of conduct might + be able to disarm his anger! What fears would assail them, lest they might + not have justly hit upon the means of assuaging his wrath! What disputes + would they not enter into upon the nature, the qualities of a ruler, + equally unknown to them all! What a variety of means would not be adopted, + to find favour in his eyes; to avert his chastisement! + </p> + <p> + Such is the history of the effects superstition has produced upon the + earth. Man has always been panic-struck, because the systems adopted never + enable him to form any correct opinion, any fixed ideas, upon a subject so + material to his happiness; because every thing conspired either to give + his ideas a fallacious turn, or else to keep his mind in the most profound + ignorance; when he was willing to set himself right, when he was sedulous + to examine the path which conducted to his felicity, when he was desirous + of probing opinions so consequential to his peace, involving so much + mystery, yet combining both his hopes and his fears, he was forbidden to + employ the only proper method,—HIS REASON, guided by his experience; + he was assured this would be an offence the most indelible. If he asked, + Wherefore his reason had then been given him, since he was not to use it + in matters of such high behest? he was answered, those were mysteries of + which none but the initiated could be informed; that it sufficed for him + to know, that the reason which he seemed so highly to prize, which he held + in so much esteem, was his most dangerous enemy—his most inveterate, + most determined foe. Where can be the propriety of such an argument? Can + it really be that reason is dangerous? If so, the Turks are justified in + their predilection for madmen: but to proceed, he is told that he must + believe in the gods, not question the mission of their priests; in short, + that he had nothing to do with the laws they imposed, but to obey them: + when he then required that these laws might at least be made + comprehensible to him; that he might be placed in a capacity to understand + them; the old answer was returned, that they were <i>mysteries</i>; he + must not inquire into them. But where is the necessity for mystery in + points of such vast importance? He might, indeed, from time to time + consult these oracles, when he was able to make the sacrifices demanded; + he would then receive precepts for his conduct: these were always, + however, given in such vague, indeterminate terms, that he had scarcely + the chance of acting right. At different times the same oracles delivered + different opinions: thus he had nothing, steady; nothing permanent, + whereby to guide his steps; like a blind man left to himself in the + streets, he was obliged to grope his way at the peril of his existence. + This will serve to shew the urgent necessity there is for truth to throw + its radiant lustre on systems big with so much importance; that are so + calculated to corroborate the animosities, to confirm the bitterness of + soul, between those whom nature intended should always act as brothers. + </p> + <p> + By the magical charms with which these idols were surrounded, the human + species has remained either as if it was benumbed, in a state of stupid + apathy, or else he has become furious with fanaticism: sometimes, + desponding with fear, man cringed like a slave who bends under the scourge + of an inexorable master, always ready to strike him; he trembled under a + yoke made too ponderous for his strength: he lived in continual dread of a + vengeance he was unceasingly striving to appease, without ever knowing + when he had succeeded: as he was always bathed in tears, continually + enveloped in misery—as he was never permitted to lose sight of his + fears—as he was continually exhorted to nourish his alarm, he could + neither labour for his own happiness nor contribute to that of others; + nothing could exhilirate him; he became the enemy of himself, the + persecutor of his fellow-creatures, because his felicity here below was + interdicted; he passed his time in heaving the most bitter sighs; his + reason being forbidden him, he fell into either a state of infancy or + delirium, which submitted him to authority; he was destined to this + servitude from the hour he quitted his mother's womb, until that in which + he was returned to his kindred dust; tyrannical opinion bound him fast in + her massive fetters; a prey to the terrors with which he was inspired, he + appeared to have come upon the earth for no other purpose than to dream—with + no other desire than to groan—with no other motives than to sigh; + his only view seemed to be to injure himself; to deprive himself of every + rational pleasure, to embitter his own existence; to disturb the felicity + of others. Thus, abject, slothful, irrational, he frequently became + wicked, under the idea of doing honour to his gods; because they instilled + into his mind that it was his duty to avenge their cause, to sustain their + honour, to propagate their worship. + </p> + <p> + Mortals were prostrate from race to race, before vain idols to which fear + had given birth in the bosom of ignorance, during the calamities of the + earth; they tremblingly adored phantoms which credulity had placed in the + recesses of their own brain, where they found a sanctuary which time only + served to strengthen; nothing could undeceive them; nothing was competent + to make them feel, it was themselves they adored—that they bent the + knee before their own work—that they terrified themselves with the + extravagant pictures they had themselves delineated; they obstinately + persisted in prostrating themselves, in perplexing themselves, in + trembling; they even made a crime of endeavouring to dissipate their + fears; they mistook the production of their own folly; their conduct + resembled that of children, who having disfigured their own features, + become afraid of themselves when a mirror reflects the extravagance they + have committed. These notions so afflicting for themselves, so grievous to + others, have their epoch from the calamities of man; they will continue, + perhaps augment, until their mind, enlightened by discarded reason, + illumined by truth, shall set in their true colours these various systems; + until reflection guided by experience, shall attach no more importance to + them, than is consistent with the happiness of society; until man, + bursting the chains of superstition—recalling to mind the great end + of his existence—taking a rational view of that which surrounds him, + shall no longer refuse to contemplate nature under her true character; + shall no longer persist in refusing to acknowledge she contains within + herself the cause of that wonderful phenomena which strikes on the dazzled + optics of man: until thoroughly persuaded of the weakness of their claim + to the homage of mankind, he shall make one pious, simultaneous, mighty + effort, and <i>overthrow the altars of Moloch and his priests</i>. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0006" id="link2H_4_0006"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. IV. + </h2> + <p> + <i>Examination of the Proofs of the Existence of the Divinity, as given by + CLARKE.</i> + </p> + <p> + The unanimity of man in acknowledging the Divinity, is commonly looked + upon as the strongest proof of his existence. There is not, it is said, + any people on the earth who have not some ideas, whether true or false, of + an all-powerful agent who governs the world. The rudest savages as well as + the most polished nations, are equally obliged to recur by thought to the + first cause of every thing that exists; thus it is affirmed, the cry of + Nature herself ought to convince us of the existence of the Godhead, of + which she has taken pains to engrave the notion in the minds of men: they + therefore conclude, that the idea of God is innate. + </p> + <p> + Perhaps there is nothing of which man should be more sedulously careful + than permitting a promiscuous assemblage of right with wrong—of + suffering false conclusions to be drawn from true propositions; this will + not improbably be found to be pretty much the case in this instance; the + existence of the great <i>Cause of causes</i>, the <i>Parent of parents</i>, + does not, I think, admit of any doubt in the mind of any one who has + reasoned: but, if this existence did not rest upon better foundations than + the unanimity of man on this subject, I am fearful it would not be placed + upon so solid a rock as those who make this asseveration may imagine: the + fact is, man is not generally agreed upon this point; if he was, + superstition could have no existence; the idea of God cannot be <i>innate</i>, + because, independent of the proofs offered on every side of the almost + impossibility of innate ideas, one simple fact will set such an opinion + for ever at rest, except with those who are obstinately determined not to + be convinced by even their own arguments: if this idea was innate, it must + be every where the same; seeing that that which is antecedent to man's + being, cannot have experienced the modifications of his existence, which + are posterior. Even if it were waived, that the same idea should be + expected from all mankind, but that only every nation should have their + ideas alike on this subject, experience will not warrant the assertion, + since nothing can be better established than that the idea is not uniform + even in the same town; now this would be an insuperable quality in an + innate idea. It not unfrequently happens, that in the endeavour to prove + too much, that which stood firm before the attempt, is weakened; thus a + bad advocate frequently injures a good cause, although he may not be able + to overturn the rights on which it is rested. It would, therefore, + perhaps, come nearer to the point if it was said, "that the natural + curiosity of mankind have in all ages, and in all nations, led him to seek + after the primary cause of the phenomena he beholds; that owing to the + variations of his climate, to the difference of his organization, the + greater or less calamity he has experienced, the variety of his + intellectual faculties, and the circumstances under which he has been + placed, man has had the most opposite, contradictory, extravagant notions + of the Divinity, but that he has uniformly been in accord in acknowledging + both the existence, and the wisdom of his work—NATURE." + </p> + <p> + If disengaged from prejudice, we analyze this proof, we shall see that the + universal consent of man, so diffused over the earth, actually proves + little more than that he has been in all countries exposed to frightful + revolutions, experienced disasters, been sensible to sorrows of which he + has mistaken the physical causes; that those events to which he has been + either the victim or the witness, have called forth his admiration or + excited his fear; that for want of being acquainted with the powers of + nature, for want of understanding her laws, for want of comprehending her + infinite resources, for want of knowing the effects she must necessarily + produce under given circumstances, he has believed these phenomena were + due to some secret agent of which he has had vague ideas—to beings + whom he has supposed conducted themselves after his own manner; who were + operated upon by similar motives with himself. + </p> + <p> + The consent then of man in acknowledging a variety of gods, proves + nothing, except that in the bosom of ignorance he has either admired the + phenomena of nature, or trembled under their influence; that his + imagination was disturbed by what he beheld or suffered; that he has + sought in vain to relieve his perplexity, upon the unknown cause of the + phenomena he witnessed, which frequently obliged him to quake with terror: + the imagination of the human race has laboured variously upon these + causes, which have almost always been incomprehensible to him; although + every thing confessed his ignorance, his inability to define these causes, + yet he maintained that he was assured of their existence; when pressed, he + spoke of a spirit, (a word to which it was impossible to attach any + determinate idea) which taught nothing but the sloth, which evidenced + nothing but the stupidity of those who pronounced it. + </p> + <p> + It ought, however, not to excite any surprise that man is incapable of + forming any substantive ideas, save of those things which act, or which + have heretofore acted upon his senses; it is very evident that the only + objects competent to move his organs are material,—that none but + physical beings can furnish him with ideas,—a truth which has been + rendered sufficiently clear in the commencement of this work, not to need + any further proof. It will suffice therefore to say that the idea of God + is not an innate, but an acquired notion; that it is the very nature of + this notion to vary from age to age; to differ in one country from + another; to be viewed variously by individuals. What do I say? It is, in + fact, an idea hardly ever constant in the same mortal. This diversity, + this fluctuation, this change, stamps it with the true character of an + acquired opinion. On the other hand, the strongest proof that can be + adduced that these ideas are founded in error, is, that man by degrees has + arrived at perfectioning all the sciences which have any known objects for + their basis, whilst the science of theology has not advanced; it is almost + every where at the same point; men seem equally undecided on this subject; + those who have most occupied themselves with it, have effected but little; + they seem, indeed, rather to have rendered the primitive ideas man formed + to himself on this head more obscure,—to have involved in greater + mystery all his original opinions. + </p> + <p> + As soon as it is asked of man, what are the gods before whom he prostrates + himself, forthwith his sentiments are divided. In order that his opinions + should be in accord, it would be requisite that uniform ideas, analogous + sensations, unvaried perceptions, should every where have given birth to + his notions upon this subject: but this would suppose organs perfectly + similar, modified by sensations which have a perfect affinity: this is + what could not happen: because man, essentially different by his + temperament, who is found under circumstances completely dissimilar, must + necessarily have a great diversity of ideas upon objects which each + individual contemplates so variously. Agreed in some general points, each + made himself a god after his own manner; he feared him, he served him, + after his own mode. Thus the god of one man, or of one nation, was hardly + ever that of another man, or of another nation. The god of a savage, + unpolished people, is commonly some material object, upon which the mind + has exercised itself but little; this god appears very ridiculous in the + eyes of a more polished community, whose minds have laboured more + intensely upon the subject. A spiritual god, whose adorers despise the + worship paid by the savage to a coarse, material object, is the subtle + production of the brain of thinkers, who, lolling in the lap of polished + society quite at their leisure, have deeply meditated, have long occupied + themselves with the subject. The theological god, although for the most + part incomprehensible, is the last effort of the human imagination; it is + to the god of the savage, what an inhabitant of the city of Sybaris, where + effiminacy and luxury reigned, where pomp and pageantry had reached their + climax, clothed with a curiously embroidered purple habit of silk, was to + a man either quite naked, or simply covered with the skin of a beast + perhaps newly slain. It is only in civilized societies, that leisure + affords the opportunity of dreaming—that ease procures the facility + of reasoning; in these associations, idle speculators meditate, dispute, + form metaphysics: the faculty of thought is almost void in the savage, who + is occupied either with hunting, with fishing, or with the means of + procuring a very precarious subsistence by dint of almost incessant + labour. The generality of men, however, have not more elevated notions of + the divinity, have not analyzed him more than the savage. A spiritual, + immaterial God, is formed only to occupy the leisure of some subtle men, + who have no occasion to labour for a subsistence. Theology, although a + science so much vaunted, considered so important to the interests of man, + is only useful to those who live at the expense of others; or of those who + arrogate to themselves the privilege of thinking for all those who labour. + This science becomes, in some polished societies, who are not on that + account more enlightened, a branch of commerce extremely advantageous to + its professors; equally unprofitable to the citizens; above all when these + have the folly to take a very decided interest in their unintelligible + system—in their discordant opinions. + </p> + <p> + What an infinite distance between an unformed stone, an animal, a star, a + statue, and the abstracted Deity, which theology hath clothed with + attributes under which it loses sight of him itself! The savage without + doubt deceives himself in the object to which he addresses his vows; like + a child he is smitten with the first object that strikes his sight—that + operates upon him in a lively manner; like the infant, his fears are + alarmed by that from which he conceives he has either received an injury + or suffered disgrace; still his ideas are fixed by a substantive being, by + an object which he can examine by his senses. The Laplander who adores a + rock,—the negro who prostrates himself before a monstrous serpent, + at least see the objects they adore. The idolater falls upon his knees + before a statue, in which he believes there resides some concealed virtue, + some powerful quality, which he judges may be either useful or prejudicial + to himself; but that subtle reasoner, called a metaphysician, who in + consequence of his unintelligible science, believes he has a right to + laugh at the savage, to deride the Laplander, to scoff at the negro, to + ridicule the idolater, doth not perceive that he is himself prostrate + before a being of his own imagination, of which it is impossible he should + form to himself any correct idea, unless, like the savage, he re-enters + into visible nature, to clothe him with qualities capable of being brought + within the range of his comprehension. + </p> + <p> + For the most part the notions on the Divinity, which obtain credit even at + the present day, are nothing more than a general terror diversely + acquired, variously modified in the mind of nations, which do not tend to + prove any thing, save that they have received them from their trembling, + ignorant ancestors. These gods have been successively altered, decorated, + subtilized, by those thinkers, those legislators, those priests, who have + meditated deeply upon them; who have prescribed systems of worship to the + uninformed; who have availed themselves of their existing prejudices, to + submit them to their yoke; who have obtained a dominion over their mind, + by seizing on their credulity,—by making them participate in their + errors,—by working on their fears; these dispositions will always be + a necessary consequence of man's ignorance, when steeped in the sorrows of + his heart. + </p> + <p> + If it be true, as asserted, that the earth has never witnessed any nation + so unsociable, so savage, to be without some form of religious worship—who + did not adore some god—but little will result from it respecting the + Divinity. The word GOD, will rarely be found to designate more than the + unknown cause of those effects which man has either admired or dreaded. + Thus, this notion so generally diffused, upon which so much stress is + laid; will prove little more than that man in all generations has been + ignorant of natural causes,—that he has been incompetent, from some + cause or other, to account for those phenomena which either excited his + surprise or roused his fears. If at the present day a people cannot be + found destitute of some kind of worship, entirely without superstition, + who do not acknowledge a God, who have not adopted a theology more or less + subtle, it is because the uninformed ancestors of these people have all + endured misfortunes—have been alarmed by terrifying effects, which + they have attributed to unknown causes—have beheld strange sights, + which they have ascribed to powerful agents, whose existence they could + not fathom; the details of which, together with their own bewildered + notions, they have handed down to their posterity who have not given them + any kind of examination. + </p> + <p> + It will readily be allowed, that the universality of an opinion by no + means proves its truth. Do we not see a great number of ignorant + prejudices, a multitude of barbarous errors, even at the present day, + receive the almost universal sanction of the human race? Are not nearly + all the inhabitants of the earth imbued with the idea of magic—in + the habit of acknowledging occult powers—given to divination—believers + in enchantment—the slaves to omens—supporters of witchcraft—thoroughly + persuaded of the existence of ghosts? If some of the most enlightened + persons are cured of these follies, they still find very zealous partizans + in the greater number of mankind, who accredit them with the firmest + confidence. It would not, however, be concluded by men of sound sense, in + many instances not by the theologian himself, that therefore these + chimeras actually have existence, although sanctioned with the credence of + the multitude. Before Copernicus, there was no one who did not believe + that the earth was stationary, that the sun described his annual + revolution round it. Was, however, this universal consent of man upon a + principle of astronomical science, which endured for so many thousand + years, less an error on that account? Yet to have doubted the truth of + such a generally-diffused opinion, one that had received the sanction of + so many learned men—that was clothed with the sacred vestments of so + many ages of credulity—that had been adopted by Moses, acknowledged + by Solomon, accredited by the Persian magi—that Elijah himself had + not refuted—that had obtained the fiat of the most respectable + universities, the most enlightened legislators, the wisest kings, the most + eloquent ministers; in short, a principle that embraced all the stability + that could be derived from the universal consent of all ranks: to have + doubted, I say, of this, would at one period have been held as the highest + degree of profanation, as the most presumptuous scepticism, as an impious + blasphemy, that would have threatened the very existence of that unhappy + country from whose unfortunate bosom such a venomous, sacrilegious mortal + could have arisen. It is well known what opinion was entertained of + Gallileo for maintaining the existence of the antipodes. Pope Gregory + excommunicated as atheists all those who gave it credit. Thus each man has + his God: But do all these gods exist? In reply it will be said, somewhat + triumphantly, each man hath his ideas of the sun, do all these suns exist? + However narrow may be the pass by which superstition imagines it has thus + guarded its favourite hypothesis, nothing will perhaps be more easy than + the answer: the existence of the sun is a fact verified by the daily use + of the senses; all the world see the sun; no one bath ever said there is + no sun; nearly all mankind have acknowledged it to be both luminous and + hot: however various may be the opinions of man, upon this luminary, no + one has ever yet pretended there was more than one attached to our + planetary system. But we may perhaps be told, there is a wide difference + between that which can be contemplated by the visual organs, which can be + understood by the sense of feeling, and that which does not come under the + cognizance of any part of the organic structure of man. We must confess + theology here has the advantage; that we are unable to follow it through + its devious sinuosities; amidst its meandering labyrinths: but then it is + the advantage of those who see sounds, over those who only hear them; of + those who hear colours, over those who only see them; of the professors of + a science, where every thing is built upon laws inverted from those common + to the globe we inhabit; over those common understandings, who cannot be + sensible to any thing that does not give an impulse to some of their + organs. + </p> + <p> + If man, therefore, had the courage to throw aside his prejudices, which + every thing conspires to render as durable as himself—if divested of + fear he would examine coolly—if guided by reason he would + dispassionately view the nature of things, the evidence adduced in support + of any given doctrine; he would, at least, be under the necessity to + acknowledge, that the idea of the Divinity is not innate—that it is + not anterior to his existence—that it is the production of time, + acquired by communication with his own species—that, consequently, + there was a period when it did not actually exist in him: he would see + clearly, that he holds it by tradition from those who reared him: that + these themselves received it from their ancestors: that thus tracing it + up, it will be found to have been derived in the last resort, from + ignorant savages, who were our first fathers. The history of the world + will shew that crafty legislators, ambitious tyrants, blood-stained + conquerors, have availed themselves of the ignorance, the fears, the + credulity of his progenitors, to turn to their own profit an idea to which + they rarely attached any other substantive meaning than that of submitting + them to the yoke of their own domination. + </p> + <p> + Without doubt there have been mortals who have dreamed they have seen the + Divinity. Mahomet, I believe, boasted he had a long conversation with the + Deity, who promulgated to him the system of the Mussulmans. But are there + not thousands, even of the theologians, who will exhaust their breath, and + fatigue their lungs with vociferating this man was a liar; whose object + was to take advantage of the simplicity, to profit by the enthusiasm, to + impose on the credulity of the Arabs; who promulgated for truths, the + crazy reveries of his own distempered imagination? Nevertheless, is it not + a truth, that this doctrine of the crafty Arab, is at this day the creed + of millions, transmitted to them by their ancestors, rendered sacred by + time, read to them in their mosques, adorned with all the ceremonies of + superstitious worship; of which the inhabitants of a vast portion of the + earth do not permit themselves for an instant to doubt the veracity; who, + on the contrary, hold those who do not accredit it as dogs, as infidels, + as beings of an inferior rank, of meaner capacities than themselves? + Indeed that man, even if he were a theologian, would not experience the + most gentle treatment from the infuriated Mahometan, who should to his + face venture to dispute the divine mission of his prophet. Thus the + ancestors of the Turk have transmitted to their posterity, those ideas of + the Divinity which they manifestly received from those who deceived them; + whose impositions, modified from age to age, subtilized by the priests, + clothed with the reverential awe inspired by fear, have by degrees + acquired that solidity, received that corroboration, attained that veteran + stability, which is the natural result of public sanction, backed by + theological parade. + </p> + <p> + The word God is, perhaps, among the first that vibrate on the ear of man; + it is reiterated to him incessantly; he is taught to lisp it with respect; + to listen to it with fear; to bend the knee when it is reverberated: by + dint of repetition, by listening to the fables of antiquity, by hearing it + pronounced by all ranks and persuasions, he seriously believes all men + bring the idea with them into the world; he thus confounds a mechanical + habit with instinct; whilst it is for want of being able to recal to + himself the first circumstances under which his imagination was awakened + by this name; for want of recollecting all the recitals made to him during + the course of his infancy; for want of accurately defining what was + instilled into him by his education; in short, because his memory does not + furnish him with the succession of causes that have engraven it on his + brain, that he believes this idea is really inherent to his being; innate + in all his species. Iamblicus, indeed, who was a Pythagorean philosopher + not in the highest repute with the learned world, although one of those + visionary priests in some estimation with theologians, (at least if we may + venture to judge by the unlimited draughts they have made on the bank of + his doctrines) who was unquestionably a favourite with the emperor Julian, + says, "that anteriorly to all use of reason, the notion of the gods is + inspired by nature, and that we have even a sort of feeling of the + Divinity, preferable to the knowledge of him." It is, however, uniformly + by habit, that man admires, that he fears a being, whose name he has + attended to from his earliest infancy. As soon as he hears it uttered, he + without reflection mechanically associates it with those ideas with which + his imagination has been filled by the recitals of others; with those + sensations which he has been instructed to accompany it. Thus, if for a + season man would be ingenuous with himself, he would concede that in the + greater number of his race, the ideas of the gods, and of those attributes + with which they are clothed, have their foundation, take their rise in, + are the fruit of the opinions of his fathers, traditionally infused into + him by education—confirmed by habit—corroborated by example—enforced + by authority. That it very rarely happens he examines these ideas; that + they are for the most part adopted by inexperience, propagated by tuition, + rendered sacred by time, inviolable from respect to his progenitors, + reverenced as forming part of those institutions he has most learned to + value. He thinks he has always had them, because he has had them from his + infancy; he considers them indubitable, because he is never permitted to + question them—because he never has the intrepidity to examine their + basis. + </p> + <p> + If it had been the destiny of a Brachman, or a Mussulman, to have drawn + his first breath on the shores of Africa, he would adore, with as much + simplicity, with as much fervour, the serpent reverenced by the Negroes, + as he does the God his own metaphysicians have offered to his reverence. + He would be equally indignant if any one should presumptuously dispute the + divinity of this reptile, which he would have learned to venerate from the + moment he quitted the womb of his mother, as the most zealous, + enthusiastic fakir, when the marvellous wonders of his prophet should be + brought into question; or as the most subtile theologian when the inquiry + turned upon the incongruous qualities with which he has decorated his + gods. Nevertheless, if this serpent god of the Negro should be contested, + they could not at least dispute his existence. Simple as may be the mind + of this dark son of nature, uncommon as may be the qualities with which he + has clothed his reptile, he still may be evidenced by all who choose to + exercise their organs of sight; not so with the theologian; he absolutely + questions the existence of every other god but that which he himself has + formed; which is questioned in its turn by his brother metaphysician. They + are by no means disposed to admit the proofs offered by each other. + Descartes, Paschal, and Doctor Samuel Clarke himself, have been accused of + atheism by the theologians of their time. Subsequent reasoners have made + use of their proofs, and even given them as extremely valid. Doctor Bowman + published a work, in which he pretends all the proofs hitherto brought + forward are crazy and fragile: he of course substitutes his own; which in + their turn have been the subject of animadversion. Thus it would appear + these theologians are not more in accord with themselves than they are + with Turks or Pagans. They cannot even agree as to their proofs of + existence: from age to age new champions arise, new evidence is adduced, + the old discarded, or treated with contempt; profound philosophers, subtle + metaphysicians, are continually attacking each other for their ignorance + on a point of the very first importance. Amidst this variety of + discussion, it is very difficult for simple winds, for those who steadily + search after truth, who only wish to understand what they believe, to find + a point upon which they can fix with reliance—a standard round which + they may rally without fear of danger—a common measure that way + serve them for a beacon to avoid the quicksands of delusion—the + sophistry of polemics. + </p> + <p> + Men of very great genius have successively miscarried in their + demonstrations; have been held to have betrayed their cause by the + weakness of the arguments by which they have supported it; by the manner + in which they have attempted to establish their positions. Thus many of + them, when they believed they had surmounted a difficulty, had the + mortification to find they had only given birth to an hundred others. They + seem, indeed, not to be in a capacity to understand each other, or to + agree among themselves, when they reason upon the nature and qualities of + beings created by such a variety of imaginations, which each contemplates + diversely, upon which the natural self-love of each disputant induces him + to reject with vehement indignation every thing that does not fall in with + his own peculiar mode of thinking—that does not quadrate either with + his superstition or his ignorance, or sometimes with both. + </p> + <p> + The opponents of Clarke charge him with begging the question in his work + on <i>The Being and Attributes of God</i>. They say he has pretended to + prove this existence <i>a priori</i>, which they deem impossible, seeing + there is nothing anterior to the first of causes; that therefore it can + only be proved <i>a posteriori</i>, that is to say, by its effects. Law, + in his <i>Inquiry into the Ideas of Space, Time, Immensity, &c</i>. + has attacked him very triumphantly, for this manner of proof, which is + stated to be so very repugnant to the school-men. His arguments have been + treated with no more ceremony by Thomas D'Aquinas, John Scott, and others + of the schools. At the present day I believe he is held in more respect—that + his authority outweighs that of all his antagonists together. Be that as + it may, those who have followed him have done nothing more than either + repeat his ideas, or present his evidence under a new form. Tillotson + argues at great length, but it would be rather difficult to understand + which side of the question he adopts on this momentous subject; whether he + is a Necessitarian, or among the opposers of Fatalism. Speaking of man, he + says, "he is liable to many evils and miseries, which he can neither + prevent or redress; he is full of wants, which he cannot supply, and + compassed about with infirmities which he cannot remove, and obnoxious to + dangers which he can never sufficiently provide against: he is apt to + grieve for what he cannot help, and eagerly to desire what he is never + able to obtain." If the proofs of Clarke, who has drawn them up in twelve + propositions, are examined with attention, I think they may be fairly + shielded from the reproach with which they have been loaded; it does not + appear that he has proved his positions <i>a priori,</i> but <i>a + posteriori,</i> according to rule. It seems clear, however, that he has + mistaken the proof of the existence of the effects, for the proof of the + existence of the cause: but here he seems to have more reason than his + critics, who in their eagerness to prove that Clarke has not conformed to + the rules of the schools, would entirely overlook the best, the surest + foundation whereon to rest the existence of the <i>Great Cause of causes,</i> + that <i>Parent of Parents</i>, whose wisdom shines so manifestly in + nature, of which Clarke's work may be said to be such a masterly evidence. + We shall follow, step by step, the different propositions in which this + learned divine developes the received opinions upon the Divinity; which, + when applied to nature, will be found to be so accurate, so correct, as to + leave no further room to doubt either the existence or the wisdom of her + great author, thus proved through her own existence. Dr. Clarke sets out + with saying: + </p> + <p> + "<i>1st. Something has existed from all eternity</i>." + </p> + <p> + This proposition is evident—hath no occasion for proofs. Matter has + existed from all eternity, its forms alone are evanescent; matter is the + great engine used by nature to produce all her phenomena, or rather it is + nature herself. We have some idea of matter, sufficient to warrant the + conclusion that this has always existed. First, that which exists, + supposes existence essential to its being. That which cannot, annihilate + itself, exists necessarily; it is impossible to conceive that that which + cannot cease to exist, or that which cannot annihilate itself, could ever + have had a beginning. If matter cannot be annihilated, it could not + commence to be. Thus we say to Dr. Clarke, that it is matter, it is + nature, acting by her own peculiar energy, of which no particle is ever in + an absolute state of rest, which hath always existed. The various material + bodies which this nature contains often change their form, their + combination, their properties, their mode of action: but their principles + or elements are indestructible—have never been able to commence. + What this great scholar actually understands, when he makes the assertion + "that an eternal duration is now actually past," is not quite so clear; + yet he affirms, "that not to believe it would be a real and express + contradiction." We may, however, safely admit his argument, "that when + once any proposition is clearly demonstrated to, be true, it ought not to + disturb us that there be perhaps some perplexing difficulties on the other + side, which merely for want of adequate ideas of the manner of the + existence of the things demonstrated, are not easily to be cleared." + </p> + <p> + <i>2nd, "There has existed from eternity some one unchangeable and + independent Being."</i> + </p> + <p> + We may fairly inquire what is this Being? Is it independent of its own + peculiar essence, or of those properties which constitute it such as it + is? We shall further inquire, if this Being, whatever it may be, can make + the other beings which it produces, or which it moves, act otherwise than + they do, according to the properties which it has given them? And in this + case we shall ask, if this Being, such as it way be supposed to be, does + not act necessarily; if it is not obliged to employ indispensible means to + fulfil its designs, to arrive at the end which it either has, or may be + supposed to have in view? Then we shall say, that nature is obliged to act + after her essence; that every thing which takes place in her is necessary; + but that she is independent of her forms. + </p> + <p> + A man is said to be independent, when he is determined in his actions only + by the general causes which are accustomed to move him; he is equally said + to be dependent on another, when he cannot act but in consequence of the + determination which this last gives him. A body is dependent on another + body when it owes to it its existence, and its mode of action. A being + existing from eternity cannot owe his existence to any other being; he + cannot then be dependent upon him, except he owes his action to him; but + it is evident that an eternal or self-existent Being contains in his own + nature every thing that is necessary for him to act: then, matter being + eternal, is necessarily independent in the sense we have explained; of + course it hath no occasion for a mover upon which it ought to depend. + </p> + <p> + This eternal Being is also immutable, if by this attribute be understood + that he cannot change his nature; but if it be intended to infer by it + that he cannot change his mode of action or existence, it is without doubt + deceiving themselves, since even in supposing an immaterial being, they + would be obliged to acknowledge in him different modes of being, different + volitions, different ways of acting; particularly if he was not supposed + totally deprived of action, in which case he would be perfectly useless. + Indeed it follows of course that to change his mode of action he must + necessarily change his manner of being. From hence it will be obvious, + that the theologians, in making their gods immutable, render them + immoveable, consequently they cannot act. An immutable being, could + evidently neither have successive volition, nor produce successive action; + if this being hath created matter, or given birth to the universe, there + must have been a time in which he was willing that this matter, this + universe, should exist; and this time must have been preceded by another + time, in which he was willing that it might not yet exist. If God be the + author of all things, as well as of the motion and of the combinations of + matter, he is unceasingly occupied in producing and destroying; in + consequence, he cannot be called immutable, touching his mode of existing. + The material world always maintains itself by motion, and the continual + change of its parts; the sum of the beings who compose it, or of the + elements which act in it, is invariably the same; in this sense the + immutability of the universe is much more easy of comprehension, much more + demonstrable than that of an other being to whom, they would attribute all + the effects, all the mutations which take place. Nature is not more to be + accused of mutability, on account of the succession of its forms, than the + eternal Being is by the theologians, by the diversity of his decrees. Here + we shall be able to perceive that, supposing the laws by which nature acts + to be immutable, it does not require tiny of these logical distinctions to + account for the changes that take place: the mutation which results, is, + on the contrary, a striking proof of the immutability of the system which + produces them; and completely brings mature under the range of this second + proposition as stated by Dr. Clarke. + </p> + <p> + <i>3dly, "That unchangeable and independent Being which has existed from + eternity without any eternal cause of its existence, must be + self-existent, that is, necessarily existing."</i> + </p> + <p> + This proposition is merely a repetition of the first; we reply to it by + inquiring, Why matter, which is indestructible, should not be + self-existent? It is evident that a being who had no beginning, must be + self-existent; if he had existed by another, he would have commenced to + be; consequently he would not be eternal. + </p> + <p> + <i>4thly, "What the substance or essence of that Being which is + self-existent, or necessarily existing, is, we have no idea; neither is it + at all possible for us to comprehend it."</i> + </p> + <p> + Dr. Clarke would perhaps have spoken more correctly if he had said his + essence is impossible to be known: nevertheless, we shall readily concede + that the essence of matter is incomprehensible, or at least that we + conceive it very feebly by the manner in which we are affected by it; but + without this we should be less able to conceive the Divinity, who would + then be impervious on any side. Thus it must necessarily be concluded, + that it is folly to argue upon it, since it is by matter alone we can have + any knowledge of him; that is to say, by which we can assure ourselves of + his existence,—by which we can at all guess at his qualities. In + short we must conclude, that every thing related of the Divinity, either + proves him material, or else proves the impossibility in which the human + mind will always find itself, of conceiving any being different from + matter; without extent, yet omnipresent; immaterial, yet acting upon + matter; spiritual, yet producing matter; immutable, yet putting every + thing in activity, &c. + </p> + <p> + Indeed it must be allowed that the incomprehensibility of the Divinity + does not distinguish him from matter; this will not be more easy of + comprehension when we shall associate it with a being much less + comprehensible than itself; we have some slender knowledge of it through + some of its parts. We do not certainly know the essence of any being, if + by that word we are to understand that which constitutes its peculiar + nature. We only know matter by the sensations, the perceptions, the ideas + which it furnishes; it is according to these that we judge it to be either + favorable or unfavourable, following the particular disposition of our + organs. But when a being does not act upon any part of our organic + structure, it does not exist for us; we cannot, without exhibiting folly, + without betraying our ignorance, without falling into obscurity, either + speak of its nature, or assign its qualities; our senses are the only + channel by which we could have formed the slightest idea of it; these not + having received any impulse, we are, in point of fact, unacquainted with + its existence. The incomprehensibility of the Divinity ought to convince + man that it is a point at which he is bound to stop; indeed he is placed + in a state of utter incapacity to proceed: this, however, would not suit + with those speculators who are willing to reason upon him continually, to + shew the depth of their learning,—to persuade the uninformed they + understand that which is incomprehensible to all men; by which they expect + to be able to submit him to their own views. Nevertheless, if the Divinity + be incomprehensible, It would not be straining a point beyond its tension, + to conclude that a priest, or metaphysician, did not comprehend him better + than other men: it is not, perhaps, either the wisest or the surest way to + become acquainted with him, to represent him to ourselves, by the + imagination of a theologian. + </p> + <p> + <i>5thly, "Though the substance, or essence of the self-existent Being, is + in itself absolutely incomprehensible to us, yet many of the essential + attributes of his nature are strictly demonstrable, as well as his + existence. Thus, in the first place, the self-existent Being must of + necessity be eternal."</i> + </p> + <p> + This proposition differs in nothing from the first, except Dr. Clarke does + not here understand that as the self-existent Being had no beginning, he + can have no end. However this may be, we must ever inquire, Why this + should not be matter? We shall further observe, that matter not being + capable of annihilation, exists necessarily, consequently will never cease + to exist; that the human mind has no means of conceiving how matter should + originate from that which is not itself matter: is it not obvious, that + matter is necessary; that there is nothing, except its powers, its + arrangement, its combinations, which are contingent or evanescent? The + general motion is necessary, but the given motion is not so; only during + the season that the particular combinations subsist, of which this motion + is the consequence, or the effect: we may be competent to change the + direction, to either accelerate or retard, to suspend or arrest, a + particular motion, but the general motion can never possibly be + annihilated. Man, in dying, ceases to live; that is to say, he no longer + either walks, thinks, or acts in the mode which is peculiar to human + organization: but the matter which composed his body, the matter which + formed his mind, does not cease to move on that account: it simply becomes + susceptible of another species of motion. + </p> + <p> + <i>6thly, "The self-existent Being must of necessity be infinite and + omnipresent."</i> + </p> + <p> + The word infinite presents only a negative idea—which excludes all + bounds: it is evident that a being who exists necessarily, who is + independent, cannot be limited by any thing which is out of himself; he + must consequently be his own limits; in this sense we may say he is + infinite. + </p> + <p> + Touching what is said of his omnipresence, it is equally evident that if + there be nothing exterior to this being, either there is no place in which + he must not be present, or that there will be only himself and the vacuum. + This granted, I shall inquire if matter exists; if it does not at least + occupy a portion of space? In this case, matter, or the universe, must + exclude every other being who is not matter, from that place which the + material beings occupy in space. In asking whether the gods of the + theologians be by chance the abstract being which they call the vacuum or + space, they will reply, no! They will further insist, that their gods, who + are not matter, penetrate that which is matter. But it must be obvious, + that to penetrate matter, it is necessary to have some correspondence with + matter, consequently to have extent; now to have extent, is to have one of + the properties of matter. If the Divinity penetrates matter, then he is + material; by a necessary deduction he is inseparable from matter; then if + he is omnipresent, he will be in every thing. This the theologian will not + allow: he will say it is a mystery; by which I shall understand that he is + himself ignorant how to account for his own positions; this will not be + the case with making nature act after immutable laws; she will of + necessity be every where, in my body, in my arm, in every other material + being, because matter composes them all. The Divinity who has given this + invariable system, will without any incongruous reasoning, without any + subterfuge, be also present every where, inasmuch as the laws he has + prescribed will unchangeably act through the whole; this does not seem + inconsistent with reason to suppose. + </p> + <p> + <i>7th, "The Self-existent Being must of necessity be but one."</i> + </p> + <p> + If there he nothing exterior to a being who exists necessarily, it must + follow that he is unique. It will be obvious that this proposition is the + same with the preceding one; at least, if they are not willing to deny the + existence of the material world. + </p> + <p> + <i>8th, "The self-existent and original Cause of all things, must be an + intelligent being."</i> + </p> + <p> + Here Dr. Clarke most unquestionably assigneth a human quality: + intelligence is a faculty appertaining to organized or animated beings, of + which we have no knowledge out of these beings. To have intelligence, it + is necessary to think; to think, it is requisite to have ideas; to have ideas, + supposes senses; when senses exist they are material; when they are + material, they cannot be a pure spirit, in the language of the theologian. + </p> + <p> + The necessary Being who comprehends, who contains, who produces animated + beings, contains, includes, and produceth intelligence. But has the great + whole a peculiar intelligence, which moveth it, which maketh it act, which + determineth it in the mode that intelligence moves and determines animated + bodies; or rather, is not this intelligence the consequence of immutable + laws, a certain modification resulting from certain combinations of + matter, which exists under one form of these combinations, but is wanting + under another form? This is assuredly what nothing is competent + absolutely, and demonstrably to prove. Man having placed himself in the + first rank in the universe, has been desirous to judge of every thing + after what he saw within himself, because he hath pretended that in order + to be perfect it was necessary to be like himself. Here is the source of + all his erroneous reasoning upon nature—the foundation of his ideas + upon his gods. He has therefore concluded, perhaps not with the most + polished wisdom, that it would be indecorous in himself, injurious to the + Divinity, not to invest him with a quality which is found estimable in man—which + he prizes highly—to which he attaches the idea of perfection—which + he considers as a manifest proof of superiority. He sees his + fellow-creature is offended when he is thought to lack intelligence; he + therefore judges it to be the same with the Divinity. He denies this + quality to nature, because he considers her a mass of ignoble matter, + incapable of self-action; although she contains and produces intelligent + beings. But this is rather a personification of an abstract quality, than + an attribute of the Deity, with whose perfections, with whose mode of + existence, he cannot by any possible means become acquainted according to + the fifth proposition of Dr. Clarke himself. It is in the earth that is + engendered those living animals called worms; yet we do not say the earth + is a living creature. The bread which man eats, the wine that he drinks, + are not themselves thinking substances; yet they nourish, sustain, and + cause those beings to think, who are susceptible of this modification of + their existence. It is likewise in nature, that is formed intelligent, + feeling, thinking beings; yet it cannot be rationally said, that nature + feels, thinks, and is intelligent after the manner of these beings, who + nevertheless spring out of her bosom. + </p> + <p> + How! cries the metaphysician, the subtilizing philosopher, what! refuse to + the Divinity, those qualities we discover in his creatures? Must, then, + the work be more perfect than the workman? Shall God, who made the eye, + not himself see? Shall God, who formed the ear, not himself hear! This at + a superficial view appears insuperable: but are the questioners, however + triumphantly they may make the inquiry, themselves aware of the length + this would carry them, even if their queries were answered with the most + unqualified affirmative? Have they sufficiently reflected on the tendency + of this mode of reasoning? If this be admitted as a postulatum, are they + prepared to follow it in all its extent? Suppose their argument granted, + what is to be done with all those other qualities upon which man does not + set so high a value? Are they also to be ascribed to the Divinity, because + we do not refuse him qualities possessed by his creatures? By a parity of + reasoning we should attach faculties that would be degrading to the + Divinity. Thus it ever happens with those who travel out of the limits of + their own knowledge; they involve themselves in perpetual contradictions + which they can never reconcile; which only serve to prove that in arguing + upon points, on which universal ignorance prevails, the result is + constantly that all the deductions made from such unsteady principles, + must of necessity be at war with each other, in hostility with themselves. + Thus, although we cannot help feeling the profound wisdom, that must have + dictated the system we see act with such uniformity, with such constancy, + with such astonishing power, we cannot form the most slender idea of the + particular nature of that wisdom; because if we were for an instant to + assimilate it to our own, weak and feeble as it is, we should from that + instant be in a state of contradiction; seeing we could not then avoid + considering the evil we witness, the sorrow we experience, as a + dereliction of this wisdom, which at least proves one great truth, <i>that + we are utterly incapable of forming an idea of the Divinity</i>. But in + contemplating things as our own experience warrants in whatever we do + understand, in considering nature as acting by unchangeable laws, we find + good and evil necessarily existing, without at all involving the wisdom of + the great <i>Cause of causes</i>; who thus has no need to remedy that, + which the further progress of the eternal system will regulate of itself, + or which industry and patient research on our parts will enable us to + discover the means of futurely avoiding. + </p> + <p> + <i>9th, "The self-existent and original Cause of all things, is not a + necessary agent, but a being endued with liberty and choice.</i>" + </p> + <p> + Man is called free, when he finds within himself motives that determine + him to action, or when his will meets no obstacle to the performance of + that to which his motives have determined him. The necessary Being of + which question is here made, doth he find no obstacles to the execution of + the projects which are attributed to him? Is he willing, adopting their + own hypothesis, that evil should be committed, or can he not prevent it? + In this latter case he is not free; if his will does meet with obstacles, + if he is willing to permit evil; then he suffers man to restrain his + liberty, by deranging his projects; if he has not these projects, then + they are themselves in error who ascribe them to him. How will the + metaphysicians draw themselves out of this perplexing intricacy? + </p> + <p> + The further a theologian goes, whilst considering his gods as possessed of + human qualities, as acting by mortal motives, the more he flounders—the + greater the mass of contradiction he heaps together: thus if it be asked + of him, can God reward crime, punish virtue, he will immediately answer, + no! In this answer he will have truth: but then this truth, and the + freedom which is ascribed to him, cannot, according to human ideas, exist + together; because if this being cannot love vice, cannot hate virtue, and + it is evident he cannot, he is in fact not more free than man himself. + Again, God is said to have made a covenant with his creatures; now it is + the very essence of a covenant to restrict choice; and that being must be + considered a necessary agent who is under the necessity of fulfilling any + given act. As it is impossible to suppose the Divinity can act + irrationally, it must be conceded that as he made these laws, he is + himself obliged to follow them: because if he was not, as we must again + suppose he does nothing without a good reason, he would thereby imply, + that the mode of action he adopted would be wiser; which would again + involve a contradiction. The theologians fearing, without doubt, to + restrain the liberty of the Divinity, have supposed it was necessary that + he should not be bound by his own laws, in which they have shewn somewhat + more ignorance of their subject than they imagined. + </p> + <p> + <i>10th, "The self-existent Being, the supreme Cause of all things, must + of necessity have infinite power."</i> + </p> + <p> + As nature is adequate to produce every thing we see—as she contains + the whole united power of the universe, her power has consequently no + limits: the being who conferred this power cannot have less. But if the + ideas of the theologians were adopted, this power would not appear quite + so unlimited; since, according to them, man is a free agent, consequently + has the means of acting contrary to this power, which at once sets a + boundary to it. An equitable monarch is perhaps nothing less than he is a + free agent; when he believes himself bound to act conformably to the laws, + which he has sworn to observe, or which he cannot violate without wounding + his justice. The theologian is a man who may be very fairly estimated + neuter; because he destroys with one hand what he establishes with the + other. + </p> + <p> + <i>11th, "The Supreme Cause and Author of all things, must of necessity be + infinitely wise."</i> + </p> + <p> + As nature produces all things by certain immutable laws, it will require + no great difficulty to allow that she may be infinitely wise: indeed, + whatever side of the argument may be taken, this fact will result as a + necessary consequence. It will hardly admit of a question that all things + are produced by nature: if, therefore, we do not allow her wisdom to be + first rate, it would be an insult to the Divinity, who gave her her + system. If the theologian himself is to take the lead, he also admits that + nature operates under the immediate auspices of his gods; whatever she + does, must then, according to his own shewing, be executed with the most + polished wisdom. But the theologian is not satisfied with going thus far: + he will insist, not only that he knows what these things are, but also + that he knows the end they have in view: this, unfortunately, is the rock + he splits upon. According to his own admission, the ways of God are + impenetrable to man. If we grant his position, what is the result? Why, + that it is at random he speaks. If these ways are impenetrable, by what + means did he acquire his knowledge of them? How did he discover the end + proposed by the Deity? If they are not impenetrable, they then can be + equally known to other men as to himself. The theologian would be puzzled + to shew he has any more privileges in nature than his fellow mortals. + Again, if he has asserted these things to be impenetrable, when they are + not so, he is then in the situation that he has himself placed Mahomet: he + is no longer worthy of being attended to, because he has swerved from + veracity. It certainly is not very consistent with the sublime idea of the + Divinity that he should be clothed with that weak, vain passion of man, + called glory: the being who had the faculty of producing such a system as + it operated in nature, could hardly be supposed to have such a frivolous + passion as we know this to be in our fellows: and as we can never reason + but after what we do know, it would appear nothing can be more + inconsistent than thus continually heaping together our own feeble, + inconsistent views, and then supposing the great <i>Cause of causes</i> + acts by such futile rules. + </p> + <p> + <i>12th, "The supreme Cause and Author of all things must of necessity be + a being of infinite goodness, justice, and truth, and all other moral + perfections, such as become the supreme governor and judge of the world."</i> + </p> + <p> + We must again repeat that these are human qualities drawn from the model + of man himself; they only suppose a being of the human species, who should + be divested of what we call imperfections: this is certainly the highest + point of view in which our finite minds are capable of contemplating the + Divinity: but as this being has neither species nor cause, consequently no + fellow creatures, he must necessarily be of an order so different to man, + that human faculties can in no wise be appropriately assigned to him. The + idea of perfection, as man understands it, is an abstract, metaphysical, + negative idea, of which he has no archetype whereby to form a judgment: he + would call that a perfect being, who, similar to himself, was wanting in + those qualities which he finds prejudicial to him; but such a being would + after all be no wore than a man. It is always relatively to himself, to + his own mode of feeling and of thinking, that a thing is either perfect or + imperfect; it is according to this, that in his eyes a thing is more or + less useful or prejudicial; agreeable or disagreeable. Justice includes + all moral perfections. One of the most prominent features of justice, in + the ideas of man, is the equity of the relations subsisting between + beings, founded upon their mutual wants. According to the theologian, his + gods owe nothing to man. How then does he measure out his ideas of + justice? For a monarch to say he owed nothing to his subjects, would be + considered, even by this theologian himself, as rank injustice; because he + would expect the fulfilment of duties on their part, without exercising + those which devolved upon himself. Duties, according to the only idea man + can form of them, must be reciprocal. It is rather stretching the human + capabilities, to understand the relations between a pure spirit and + material beings—between finity and infinity—between eternal + beings and those which are transitory: thus it is, that metaphysics hold + forth an inconceivable being by the very attributes with which they clothe + him; for either he has these attributes, or he has them not: whether he + has them or has them not, man can only understand them after his own + powers of comprehension. If he does at all understand them, he cannot have + the slightest idea of justice unaccompanied by duties, which are the very + basis, the superstructure, the pillars upon which this virtue rests. + Whether we are to view it as self-love or ignorance in the theologian, + that he thus dresses up his gods after himself, it certainly was not the + happiest effort of his imagination to work by an inverse rule: for, + according to himself, the qualities he describes are all the negation of + what he calls them. Doctor Clarke himself stumbles a little upon these + points; he insists upon free agency, and uses this extraordinary method to + support his argument; he says, "God is, by necessity, a free agent: and he + can no more possibly cease to be so, than he can cease to exist. He must + of necessity, every moment choose to act, or choose to forbear acting; + because two contradictories cannot possibly be true at once. Man also is + by necessity, not in the nature of things, but through God's appointment, + a free agent. And it is no otherwise in his power to cease to be such, + than by depriving himself of life." Will Doctor Clarke permit us to put + one simple question: If to be obligated to do a certain given thing, is to + be free, what is it to be coerced? Or if two contradictories cannot be + true at once, by what rule of logic are we to measure the idea of that + freedom which arises out of necessity. Supposing necessity to be what Dr. + Johnson, (using Milton as his authority) says it is, "compulsion," + "fatality," would it be considered a man was less restrained in his + actions because he was only compelled to do what was right? The restraint + would undoubtedly he beneficial to him, but it would not therefore render + him more a free agent. If the Divinity cannot love wickedness, cannot hate + goodness, (and surely the theologians themselves will not pretend he can,) + then the power of choice has no existence as far as these two things are + concerned; and this upon Clarke's own principle, because two + contradictories cannot be true at once. Nothing could, I think, appear a + greater contradiction, than the idea that the <i>Great Cause of causes</i> + could by any possibility love vice: if such a monstrous principle could + for a moment have existence, there would be an end of all the foundations + of religion. + </p> + <p> + The Doctor is very little happier in reasoning upon <i>immateriality</i>. + He says, by way of illustrating his argument, "that it is possible to + infinite power to create an immaterial cogitative substance, endued with a + power of beginning motion, and with a liberty of will or choice." Again, + "that immaterial substances are not impossible; or, that a substance + immaterial is not a contradictory notion. Now, whoever asserts that it is + contradictory, must affirm that whatever is not matter is nothing; and + that, to say any thing exists which is not matter, is saying that there + exists something which is nothing, which in other words is plainly this,—that + whatever we have not an idea of, is nothing, and impossible to be." It + could, I am apt to believe, never have entered into any reasonable mind + that a thing was impossible because he could have no idea of it:—many + things, on the contrary, are possible, of which we have not the most + slender notion: but it does not, I presume, flow consecutively out of this + admission, that therefore every thing is, which is not impossible. Doctor + Clarke then, rather begs the question on this occasion. In the schools it + is never considered requisite to prove a negative; indeed, this is ranked + by logicians amongst those things impossible to be, but it is considered + of the highest importance to soundness of argument, to establish the + affirmative by the most conclusive reasoning. Taking this for granted, we + will apply the doctor's own reasoning. He says, "Nothing is that of which + every thing, can truly be affirmed. So that the idea of nothing, if I may + so speak, is absolutely the negative of all ideas; the idea, therefore, + either of a finite or infinite nothing is a contradiction in terms." To + affirm, of a thing with truth, it must be necessary to be acquainted with + that thing. To have ideas, as we have already proved, it is necessary to + have perceptions; to have perceptions, it is requisite to have sensations; + to have sensations, requires organs. An idea cannot be, and not be, at the + same moment: the idea of substance, it will scarcely be denied, is that of + a thing solid, real, according to Dryden; capable of supporting accidents, + according to Watts; something of which we can say that it is, according to + Davies; body, corporeal nature, according to Newton; the idea of + immaterial, according to Hooker, is incorporeal. How then am I to + understand immaterial substance? Is it not, according to these + definitions, that which cannot couple together? If a thing be immaterial, + it cannot be a substance; if a substance, it cannot be immaterial: those I + apprehend will not have many ideas, who do not see this is a complete + negative of all ideas. If, therefore, on the outset, the doctor cannot + find words, by which he can convey the idea of that of which he is so + desirous to prove the existence, by what chain of reasoning does he + flatter himself that he is to be understood? He will endeavour to draw out + of this dilemma, by assuring as there are things which we can neither see + nor touch, but which do not the less exist on that account. Granted: but + from thence we can neither reason upon them, nor assign them qualities; we + must at least either feel them or something like them, before we can have + any idea of them: this, however, would not prove they were not substances, + nor that substances can be immaterial. A thing may with great possibility + exist of which we have no knowledge, and yet be material; but I maintain + until we have a knowledge of it, it exists not for us, any more than + colours exist for a man born blind; the man who has sight knows they do + exist, can describe them to his dark neighbour; from this description the + blind man may form some idea of them by analogy with what he himself + already knows; or, perhaps, having a finer tact than his neighbour, he may + be enabled to distinguish them by their surfaces; it would, therefore, be + bad reasoning in the man born blind, to deny the existence of colours; + because although these colours may have no relation with the senses in the + absence of sight, they have with those who have it in their power to see + and to know them: this blind man, however, would-appear a little + ridiculous if he undertook to define them with all their gradations of + shade; with all their variations under different masses of light. Again, + if those who were competent to discriminate these modifications of matter + called colours, were to define them to this blind man, as those + modifications of matter called sound, would the blind man be able to have + any conception of them? It certainly would not be wise in him to aver, + that such a thing as colorific sound had no existence, was impossible; but + at least he would be very justifiable in saying, they appeared + contradictions, because he had some ideas of sound which did not at all + aid him in forming those of colour; he would not, perhaps, be very + inconclusive if he suspected the competency of his informer to the + definition attempted, from his inability to convey to him in any distinct, + understood terms, his own ideas of colours. The theologian is a blind man, + who would explain to others who are also blind, the shades and colours of + a portrait whose original he has not even stumbled upon in the dark. There + is nothing incongruous in supposing that every thing which has existence + is matter; but it requires the complete inversion of all our ideas, to + conceive that which is immaterial; because, in point of fact, this would + be a quality of which "nothing can with truth be affirmed." + </p> + <p> + It is, indeed true, that Plato, who was a great creator of chimeras, says, + "those who admit nothing but what they can see and feel, are stupid + ignorant beings, who refuse to admit the reality of the existence of + invisible things." With all due deference to such an authority, we may + still venture to ask, is there then no difference, no shade, no gradation, + between an admission of possibilities and the proof of realities. Theology + would then be the only science in which it is permitted to conclude that a + thing is, as soon as it is possible to be. Will the assertion of either + Clarke or Plato stand absolutely in place of all evidence? Would they + themselves permit such to be convincing if used against them? The + theologians evidently hold this Platonic, this dogmatical language; they + have dreamed the dreams of their master; perhaps if they were examined a + little, they would be found nothing more than the result of those obscure + notions, those unintelligible metaphysics, adopted by the Egyptian, + Chaldean, and Assyrian priests, among whom Plato drew up his philosophy. + If, however, philosophy means that which we are led to suppose it does, by + the great John Locke, it is "a system by which natural effects are + explained." Taken in this sense we shall be under the necessity of + agreeing, that the Platonic doctrines in no wise merit this distinction, + seeing he has only drawn the human mind from the contemplation of visible + nature, to plunge it into the unfathomable depths of invisibility—of + intangibility—of suppositious speculation, where it can find little + other food except chimeras or conjecture. Such a philosophy is rather + fantastical, yet it would seem we are required to subscribe to its + positions without being allowed to compare them with reason, to examine + them through the medium of experience, to try the gold by the action of + fire: thus we have in abundance the terms spirits, incorporeal substances, + invisible powers, supernatural effects, innate ideas, mysterious virtues, + possessed by demons, &c. &c. which render our senses entirely + useless, which put to flight every thing like experience; while we are + gravely told that "nothing is that, of which no thing can truly be + affirmed." Whoever may be willing to take the trouble of reading the works + of Plato and his disciples, such as Proclus, Iamblicus, Plotinus, and + others, will not fail to find in them almost every doctrine, every + metaphysical subject of the theologian; in fact, the theurgy of many of + the modern superstitions, which for the most part seems to be little more + than a slight variation of that adopted by the ethnic priests. Dreamers + have not had that variety in their follies, that has generally been + imagined. That some of these things should be extensively admitted, by no + means affords proof of their existence. Nothing appears more facile than + to make mankind admit the greatest absurdities, under the imposing name of + mysteries; after having imbued him from his infancy with maxims calculated + to hoodwink his reason—to lead him astray—to prevent him from + examining that which he is told he must believe. Of this there cannot well + exist a more decisive proof than the great extent of country, the millions + of human beings who faithfully and without examination have adopted the + idle dreams, the rank absurdities, of that arch impostor Mahomet. However + this may be, we shall be obliged again to reply to Plato, and to those of + his followers who impose upon us the necessity of believing that which we + cannot comprehend, that, in order to know that a thing exists, it is at + least necessary to have some idea of it; that this idea can only come to + us by the medium of our senses; that consequently every thing of which our + senses do not give us a knowledge, is in fact nothing for us; and can only + rest upon our faith; upon that admission which is pretty generally, even + by the theologian himself, considered as rather a sandy foundation whereon + to erect the altar of truth: that if there be an absurdity in not + accrediting the existence of that which we do not know, there is no less + extravagance in assigning it qualities; in reasoning upon its properties; + in clothing it with faculties, which may or may not be suitable to its + mode of existence; in substituting idols of our own creation; in combining + incompatible attributes, which will neither bear the test of experience + nor the scrutiny of reason; and then endeavouring to make the whole pass + current by dint of the word infinite, which we will now examine. + </p> + <p> + Infinite, according to Dennis, means "boundless, unlimited." Doctor Clarke + thus describes it:—he says, "The self-existent being must be a most + simple, unchangeable incorruptible being; without parts, figure, motion, + divisibility, or any other such properties as we find in matter. For all + these things do plainly and necessarily imply finiteness in their very + notion, and are utterly inconsistent with complete infinity." Ingenuously, + is it possible for man to form any true notion of such a quality? The + theologians themselves acknowledge he cannot. Further, the Doctor allows, + "That as to the particular manner of his being infinite, or every where + present, in opposition to the manner of created things being present in + such or such finite places, this is as impossible for our finite + understandings to comprehend or explain, as it is for us to form an + adequate idea of infinity." What is this, then, but that which no man can + explain or comprehend? If it cannot be comprehended, it cannot be + detailed; if it cannot be detailed, it is precisely "that of which nothing + can with truth be affirmed;" and this is Dr. Clarke's own explanation of + nothing. Indeed, is not the human mind obliged by its very nature to join + limited quantities to other quantities, which it can only conceive as + limited, in order to form to itself a sort of confused idea of something + beyond its own grasp, without ever reaching the point of infinity, which + eludes every attempt at definition? Then it would appear that it is an + abstraction, a mere negation of limitation. + </p> + <p> + Our learned adversary seems to think it strange that the existence of + incorporeal, immaterial substances, the essence of which we are not able + to comprehend, should not be generally accredited. To enforce this belief, + he says, "There is not so mean and contemptible a plant or animal, that + does not confound the most enlarged understanding, upon earth: nay, even + the simplest and plainest of all inanimate beings have their essence or + substance hidden from us in the deepest and most impenetrable obscurity." + </p> + <p> + We shall reply to him, + </p> + <p> + <i>First</i>, That the idea of an immaterial substance; or being without + extent, is only an absence of ideas, a negation of extent, as we have + already shewn; that when we are told a being is not matter, they speak to + us of that which is not, and do not teach us that which is; because by + insisting that a being is such, that it cannot act upon any of our senses, + they, in fact, inform us that we have no means of assuring ourselves + whether such being exists or not. + </p> + <p> + <i>Secondly</i>, We shall avow without the least hesitation, that men of + the greatest genius, of the most indefatigable research, are not + acquainted with the essence of stones, plants, animals, nor with the + secret springs which constitute some, which make others vegetate or act: + but then at least we either feel them or see them; our senses have a + knowledge of them in some respects; we can perceive some of their effects; + we have something whereby to judge of them, either accurately or + inaccurately; we can conceive that which is matter, however varied, + however subtle, however minute, by analogy with other matter; but our + senses cannot compass that which is immaterial on any side; we cannot by + any possible means understand it; we have no means whatever of + ascertaining its existence; consequently we cannot even form an idea of + it; such a being is to us an occult principle, or rather a being which + imagination has composed, by deducting from it every known quality. If we + are ignorant of the intimate combination of the most material beings, we + at least discover, with the aid of experience, some of their relations + with ourselves: we have a knowledge of their surface, their extent, their + form, their colour, their softness, their density; by the impressions they + make on our senses, we are capable of discriminating them—of + comparing them—of judging of them in some manner—of seeing + them—of either avoiding or courting them, according to the different + modes in which we are affected by them; we cannot apply any of these tests + to immaterial beings; to spirits; neither can those men who are + unceasingly talking to mankind of these inconceivable things. + </p> + <p> + <i>Thirdly</i>, We have a consciousness of certain modifications in + ourselves, which we call sentiment, thought, will, passions: for want of + being acquainted with our own peculiar essence; for want of precisely + understanding the energy of our own particular organization, we attribute + these effects to a concealed cause, distinguished from ourselves; which + the theologians call a spiritual cause, inasmuch as it appears to act + differently from our body. Nevertheless, reflection, experience, every + thing by which we are enabled to form any kind of judgment, proves that + material effects can only emanate from material causes. We see nothing in + the universe but physical, material effects, these can only be produced by + analogous causes; it is, then certainly more rational to attribute them to + nature herself, of which we may know something, if we will but deign to + meditate her with attention, rather than to spiritual causes, of which we + must for ever remain ignorant, let us study them as long as we please. + </p> + <p> + If incomprehensibility be not a sufficient reason for absolutely denying + the possibility of immateriality, it certainly is not of a cogency to + establish its existence; we shall always be less in a capacity to + comprehend a spiritual cause, than one that is material; because + materiality is a known quality; spirituality is an occult, an unknown + quality; or rather it is a mode of speech of which we avail ourselves to + throw a veil over our own ignorance. We are repeatedly told that our + senses only bring us acquainted with the external of things; that our + limited ideas are not capable of conceiving immaterial beings: we agree + frankly to this position; but then our senses do not even shew us the + external of these immaterial substances, Which the theologians will + nevertheless attempt to define to us; upon which they unceasingly dispute + among themselves; upon which even until this day they are not in perfect + unison with each other. The great John Locke in his familiar letters, + says, "I greatly esteem all those who faithfully defend their opinions; + but there are so few persons who, according to the manner they do defend + them, appear fully convinced of the opinions they profess, that I am + tempted to believe there are more sceptics in the world than are generally + imagined." + </p> + <p> + Abady, one of the most strenuous supporters of immaterialism, says, "The + question is not what incorporeity is, but whether it be." To settle this + disputable point, it were necessary to have some data whereon to form our + judgment; but how assure ourselves of the existence of that, of which we + shall never be competent to have a knowledge? If we are not told what this + is; if some tangible evidence be not offered to the human mind; how shall + we feel ourselves capacitated to judge whether or not its existence be + even possible? How form an estimate of that picture whose colours elude + our sight, whose design we cannot perceive, whose features have no means + of becoming familiar to our mind, whose very canvas refuses itself to our + all research, of which the artist himself can afford no other idea, no + other description, but that it is, although he himself can neither shew us + how or where! We have seen the ruinous foundations upon which men have + hitherto erected this fanciful idea of immateriality; we have examined the + proofs which they have offered, if proofs they can be called, in support + of their hypothesis; we have sifted the evidence they have been willing to + have accredited, in order to establish their position; we have pointed out + the numberless contradictions that result from their want of union on this + subject, from the irreconcileable qualities with which they clothe their + imaginary system. What conclusion, then, ought fairly, rationally, + consistently, to be drawn from the whole? Can we, or can we not admit + their argument to be conclusive, such as ought to be received by beings + who think themselves sane? Will it allow any other inference than that it + has no existence; that immateriality is a quality hitherto unproved; the + idea of which the mind of man has no means of compassing? Still they will + insist, "there are no contradictions between the qualities which they + attribute to these immaterial substances; but there is a difference + between the understanding of man and the nature of these substances." This + granted, are they nearer the point at which they labour? What standard is + it necessary man should possess, to enable him to judge of these + substances? Can they shew the test that will lead to an acquaintance with + them? Are not those who have thus given loose to their imagination, who + have given birth to this system, themselves men? Does not the + disproportion, of which they speak with such amazing confidence, attach to + themselves as well as to others? If it needs an infinite mind to + comprehend infinity—to form an idea of incorporeity—can the + theologian himself boast he is in a capacity to understand it? To what + purpose then is it they speak of these things to others? Why do they + attempt descriptions of that which they allow to be indescribable? Man, + who will never be an infinite being, will never be able to conceive + infinity; if, then, he has hitherto been incompetent to this perfection of + knowledge, can he reasonably flatter himself he will ever obtain it; can + he hope under any circumstances to conquer that which according to the + shewing of all is unconquerable? + </p> + <p> + Nevertheless it is pretended, that it is absolutely necessary to know + these substances: but how prove the necessity of having a knowledge of + that which is impossible to be known? We are then told that good sense and + reason are sufficient to convince us of its existence: this is taking new + ground, when the old has been found untenable: for we are also told that + reason is a treacherous guide; one that frequently leads us astray; that + in religious matters it ought not to prevail: at least then they ought to + shew us the precise time when we must resume this reason. Shall we consult + it again, when the question is, whether what they relate is probable; + whether the discordant qualities which they unite are consistently + combined; whether their own arguments have all that solidity which they + would themselves wish them to possess? But we have strangely mistaken them + if they are willing that we should recur to it upon these points; they + will instead, insist we ought blindly to be directed by that which they + vouchsafe to inform us; that the most certain road to happiness is to + submit in all things to that which they have thought proper to decide on + the nature of things, of which they avow their own ignorance, when they + assert them to be beyond the reach of mortals. Thus it would appear that + when we should consent to accredit these mysteries, it would never arise + of our own knowledge; seeing this can no otherwise obtain but by the + effect of demonstrable evidence; it would never arise from any intimate + conviction of our minds; but it would be entirely on the word of the + theologian himself, that we should ground our faith; that we should yield + our belief. If these things are to the human species what colours are to + the man born blind, they have at least no existence with relation to + ourselves. It will avail the blind man nothing to tell him these colours + have no less existence, because he cannot see them. But what shall we say + of that portrait whose colours the blind man attempts to explain, whose + features he is willing we should receive upon his authority, whose + proportions are to be taken from his description, merely because we know + he cannot behold them? + </p> + <p> + The Doctor, although unwilling to relinquish his subject, removes none of + the difficulty when he asks, "Are our five senses, by an absolute + necessity in the nature of the thing, all and the only possible ways of + perception? And is it impossible and contradictory there should be any + being in the universe, indued with ways of perception different from these + that are the result of our present composition? Or are these things, on + the contrary, purely arbitrary; and the same power that gave us these, may + have given others to other beings, and might, if he had pleased have given + to us others in this present state?" It seems perfectly unnecessary to the + true point of the argument to reason upon what can or cannot be done: I + therefore reply, that the fact is, we have but five senses: by the aid of + these man is not competent to form any idea whatever of immateriality; but + he is also in as absolute a state of ignorance, upon what might be his + capabilities of conception, if he had more senses. It is rather + acknowledging a weakness in his evidence, on the part of the Doctor, to be + thus obliged to rest it upon the supposition of what might be the case, if + man was a being different to what he is; in other words, that they would + be convincing to mankind if the human race were not human beings. + Therefore to demand what the Divinity could have done in such a case, is + to suppose the thing in question, seeing we cannot form an idea how far + the power of the Divinity extends: but we may be reasonably allowed to use + the theological argument in elucidation; these men very gravely insist, + upon what authority must be best known to themselves, "that God cannot + communicate to his works that perfection which he himself possesses;" at + the same moment they do not fail to announce his omnipotence. Will it + require any capacity, more than is the common lot of a child, to + comprehend the absurd contradiction of the two assertions? As beings + possessing but five senses, we must then, of necessity, regulate our + judgment by the information they are capable of affording us: we cannot, + by any possibility, have a knowledge of those, which confer the capacity + to comprehend beings, of an order entirely distinguished from that in + which we occupy a place. We are ignorant of the mode in which even plants + vegetate, how then be acquainted with that which has no affinity with + ourselves? A man born blind, has only the use of four senses; he has not + the right, however, of assuming it as a fact, there does not exist an + extra sense for others; but he may very reasonably, and with great truth + aver, that he has no idea of the effects which would be produced in him, + by the sense which he lacks: notwithstanding, if this blind man was + surrounded by other men, whose birth had also left them devoid or sight, + might he not without any very unwarrantable presumption, be authorized to + inquire of them by what right, upon what authority, they spoke to him of a + sense they did not themselves possess; how they were enabled to reason, to + detail the minutiae of that sensation upon which their own peculiar + experience taught them nothing? + </p> + <p> + In short, we can again reply to Dr. Clarke, and to the theologians, that + following up their own systems, the supposition is impossible, and ought + not to be made, seeing that the Divinity, who according to their own + shewing, made man, was not willing that he should have more than five + senses; in other words, that he should be nothing but what he actually is; + they all found the existence of these immaterial substances upon the + necessity of a power that has the faculty to give a commencement to + motion. But if matter has always existed, of which there does not seem to + exist a doubt, it has always had motion, which is as essential to it as + its extent, and flows from its primitive properties. Indeed the human + mind, with its five senses, is not more competent to comprehend matter + devoid of motion, than it is to understand the peculiar quality of + immateriality: motion therefore exists only in and by matter; mobility is + a consequence of its existence; not that the great whole can occupy other + parts of space than it actually does; the impossibility of that needs no + argument, but all its parts can change their respective situations—do + continually change them; it is from thence results the preservation, the + life of nature, which is always as a whole immutable: but in supposing, as + is done every day, that matter is inert, that is to say, incapable of + producing any thing by itself, without the assistance of a moving power, + which sets it in motion, are we by any means enabled to conceive that + material nature receives this activity from an agent, who partakes in + nothing of material substance? Can man really figure to himself, even in + idea, that that which has no one property of matter, can create matter, + draw it from its own peculiar source, arrange it, penetrate it, give it + play, guide its course? Is it not, on the contrary, more rational to the + mind, more consistent with truth, more congenial to experience, to suppose + that the being who made matter is himself material: is there the smallest + necessity to suppose otherwise? Can it make man either better or worse, + that he should consider the whole that exists as material? Will it in any + manner make him a worse subject to his sovereign; a worse father to his + children; a more unkind husband; a more faithless friend? + </p> + <p> + Motion, then, is co-eternal with matter: from all eternity the particles + of the universe have acted and reacted upon each other, by virtue of their + respective energies; of their peculiar essences; of their primitive + elements; of their various combinations. These particles must have + combined in consequence of their affinity; they must have been either + attracted or repelled by their respective relations with each other; in + virtue of these various essences, they must have gravitated one upon the + other; united when they were analagous; separated when that analogy was + dissolved, by the approach of heterogeneous matter; they must have + received their forms, undergone a change of figure, by the continual + collision of bodies. In a material world the acting powers must be + material: in a whole every part of which is essentially in motion, there + is no occasion for a power distinguished from itself; the whole must be in + perpetual motion by its own peculiar energy. The general motion, as we + have elsewhere proved, has its birth from the individual motion, which + beings ever active must uninterruptedly communicate to each other. Thus + every cause produces its effect; this effect in its turn becomes a cause, + which in like manner produces an effect; this constitutes the eternal + chain of things, which although perpetually changing in its detail, + suffers no change in its whole. + </p> + <p> + Theology, after all, has seldom done more than personify this eternal + series of motion; the principle of mobility inherent to matter: it has + clothed this principle with human qualities, by which it has rendered it + unintelligible: in applying these properties, they have taken no means of + understanding how far they were suitable or not: in their eagerness to + make them assimilate, they have extended them beyond their own conception; + they have heaped them together without any judgment; and they have been + surprised when these qualities, contradictory in themselves, did not + enable them satisfactorily to account for all the phenomena they beheld; + from thence they have wrangled; accused each other of imbecility; yet + infuriated themselves against whoever had the temerity to question that + which they did not themselves understand; in short, they have acted like a + man who should insist that all other men should have precisely the same + vision that he himself had dreamed. + </p> + <p> + Be this as it may, the greater portion of what either Dr. Clarke or the + theologians tell us, becomes, in some respects, sufficiently intelligible + as soon as applied to nature—to matter: it is eternal, that is to + say, it cannot have had a commencement, it never will have an end; it is + infinite, that is to say, we have no conception of its limits. + Nevertheless, human qualities, which must be always borrowed from + ourselves, and with others we have a very slender acquaintance, cannot be + well suitable to the entire of nature; seeing that these qualities are in + themselves modes of being, or modes which appertain only to particular + beings: not to the great whole which contains them. + </p> + <p> + Thus, to resume the answers which have been given to Dr. Clarke, we shall + say: <i>First</i>, we can conceive that matter has existed from all + eternity, seeing that we cannot conceive it to have been capable of + beginning. <i>Secondly</i>, that matter is independent, seeing there is + nothing exterior to itself; that it is immutable, seeing it cannot change + its nature, although it is unceasingly changing its form and its + combinations. <i>Thirdly</i>, that matter is self-existent, since not + being able to conceive it can be annihilated, we cannot possibly conceive + it can have commenced to exist. <i>Fourthly</i>, that we do not know the + essence, or the true nature of matter, although we have a knowledge of + some of its properties; of some of its qualities: according to the mode in + which they act upon us. <i>Fifthly</i>, that matter not having had a + beginning, will never have an end, although its numerous combinations, its + various forms, have necessarily a commencement and a period. <i>Sixthly</i>, + that if all that exists, or every thing our mind can conceive is matter, + this matter is infinite; that is to say, cannot be limited by any thing; + that it is omnipresent, seeing there is no place exterior to itself, + indeed, if there was a place exterior to it, that would be a vacuum. <i>Seventhly</i>, + that nature is unique, although its elements or its parts may be varied to + infinity, indued with properties extremely opposite; with qualities + essentially different. <i>Eighthly</i>, that matter, arranged, modified, + and combined in a certain mode, produces in some beings what we call + intelligence, which is one of its modes of being, not one of its essential + properties, <i>Ninthly</i>, that matter is not a free agent, since it + cannot act otherwise than it does, in virtue of the laws of its nature, or + of its existence; that consequently, heavy bodies must necessarily fall; + light bodies by the same necessity rise; fire must burn; man must + experience good and evil, according to the quality of the beings whose + action he experiences. <i>Tenthly</i>, that the power or the energy of + matter, has no other bounds than those which are prescribed by its own + existence. <i>Eleventhly</i>, that wisdom, justice, goodness, &c. are + qualities peculiar to matter combined and modified, as it is found in some + beings of the human species; that the idea of perfection is an abstract, + negative, metaphysical idea, or mode of considering objects, which + supposes nothing real to be exterior to itself. <i>Twelfthly</i>, that + matter is the principle of motion, which it contains within itself: since + matter alone is capable of either giving or receiving motion: this is what + cannot be conceived of immateriality or simple beings destitute of parts, + devoid of extent, without mass, having no ponderosity, which consequently + cannot either move itself or other bodies. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0007" id="link2H_4_0007"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. V. + </h2> + <p> + <i>Examination of the Proofs offered by DESCARTES, MALEBRANCHE, NEWTON, + &c</i>. + </p> + <p> + If the evidence of Clarke did not prove satisfactory—if the + theologians of his day disputed the manner in which he handled his subject—if + they were disposed to think he had not established his argument upon + proper foundations, it did not seem probable that either the system of + Descartes, the sublime reveries of Malebranche, or the more methodical + mode adopted by Newton, were at all likely to meet with a better + reception; the same objections will lie against them all, that they have + not demonstrated the existence of their immaterial substances; although + they have incessantly spoken of them, as if they were things of which they + had the most intimate knowledge. Unfortunately this is a rock which the + most sublime geniuses have not been competent to avoid: the most + enlightened men have done little more than stammer upon a subject which + they have all concurred in considering of the highest importance; which + they unceasingly hold forth as the most necessary for man to know; without + at the same time considering he is not in a condition to occupy himself + with objects inaccessible to his senses—which his mind, + consequently, can never grasp—which his utmost research cannot bring + into that tangible shape by which alone he can be enabled to form a + judgment. + </p> + <p> + To the end that we may be convinced of that want of solidity which the + greatest men have not known how to give to the proofs they have offered, + but which they have successively imagined has established their positions, + let us briefly examine what the most celebrated philosophers, what the + most subtile metaphysicians have said. For this purpose we will begin with + Descartes, the restorer of philosophy among the moderns, to whose sublime + errors we are indebted for the effulgent truths of the Newtonian system. + This great man himself tells us, "All the strength of argument which I + have hitherto used to prove the existence of immaterial substances, + consists in this, that I acknowledge it would not be possible, my nature + was such as it is, that is to say, that I should have in me the idea of + immateriality, if this incorporeity did not truly exist; this same + immateriality, of which the idea is in me, possesses all those high + perfections of which our mind can have some slight idea, without however + being able to comprehend them." In another place he says, "We must + necessarily conclude from this alone, that because I exist, and have the + idea of immateriality, that is to say, of a most perfect being, the + existence is therefore most evidently demonstrated." There are not, + perhaps, many except Descartes himself, to whom this would appear quite so + conclusive; who would be impressed with the conviction which he seems to + imagine is so very substantive. + </p> + <p> + <i>First</i>, We shall reply to Descartes, it is not a warrantable + deduction, that because we have an idea of a thing, we must therefore + conclude it exists; to give validity to such a mode of reasoning would be + productive of the greatest mischief; would, in fact, tend to subvert all + human institutions. Our imagination presents us with the idea of a sphinx, + or of an hippogriff, besides a thousand other fantastical beings; are we, + on that authority, to insist that these things really exist? Is the mere + circumstance of our having an idea of various parts of nature, + discrepantly jumbled together, without any other evidence as to the + assemblage, a sufficient warrantry for calling upon mankind to accredit + the existence of such heterogeneous masses? If a philosopher of the most + consummate experience, of the greatest celebrity, one who enjoyed the + confidence of mankind above every other, was to detail the faculties and + perfections of these visionary beings, although he should hold them forth + as the perfection of all natural combinations, would, I say, any + reasonable being lend himself to the asseveration? + </p> + <p> + <i>Secondly</i>, It is obvious that the mere circumstance of existence, + does not prove the absolute existence of any thing anterior to itself; + although in man, as well as the other beings of nature, it is evidence + that something has existed before him. If this argument was to be + admitted, are they aware how far it, would carry them? To maintain that + the existence of one being demonstrably proves the existence of an + anterior being, would be, in fact, denying that any thing was + self-existent. The fallacy of such a position is too glaring to need + refutation. + </p> + <p> + <i>Thirdly</i>, It is not possible he should have a distinct, positive + idea of immateriality, of which be, as well as the theologian, labours to + prove the existence. It is impossible for man, for a material being, to + form to himself a correct idea, or indeed any idea, of incorporeity; of a + substance without extent, acting upon nature, which is corporeal; a truth + which it may not be presuming too much to say we have already sufficiently + proved. + </p> + <p> + <i>Fourthly</i>, It is equally impossible for man to have any clear, + decided idea of perfection, of infinity, of immensity, and other + theological attributes. To Descartes we must therefore reply as we have + done to Dr. Clarke on his twelfth proposition. + </p> + <p> + Thus nothing can well be less conclusive than the proofs upon which + Descartes rests the existence of immateriality. He gives it thought and + intelligence, but how conceive these qualities without a subject to which + they may adhere? He pretends that we cannot conceive it but "as a power + which applies itself successively to the parts of the universe." Again, he + says, "that an immaterial substance cannot be said to have extent, but as + we say of fire contained in a piece of iron, which has not, properly + speaking, any other extension than that of the iron itself." According to + these notions we shall be justified in taxing him with having announced in + a very clear, in a most unequivocal manner, that this is nature herself: + this indeed is a pure Spinosism; it was decidedly on the principles of + Descartes that Spinosa drew up his system; in fact it flows out of it + consecutively. + </p> + <p> + We might, therefore, with great reason, accuse Descartes of atheism, + seeing that he very effectually destroys the feeble proofs he adduces in + support of his own hypothesis; we have solid foundation for insisting that + his system overturns the idea of the creation, because if from the + modification we subtract the subject, the modification itself disappears: + and if, according to the Cartesians, this immateriality is nothing without + nature, they are complete Spinosians, with another name. If incorporeity + is the motive-power of this nature, it no longer exists independently; it, + in fact, exists no longer than the subject to which it is inherent + subsists. Thus no longer existing independently, it will exist only while + the nature which it moves shall endure; without matter, without a subject + to move, to preserve, what is to become of it, according to this doctrine, + or rather according to this elucidation of a system which is in itself + untenable? + </p> + <p> + It will be obvious from this, that Descartes, far from establishing on a + rocky foundation the existence of this immateriality, totally destroys his + own system. The same thing will necessarily happen to all those who reason + upon his principles; they will always finish by confuting him, and by + contradicting themselves. The same want of just inference, the same + discrepancy, will obtrude themselves in the principles of the celebrated + Father Malebranche; which, if considered with the slightest attention, + appear to conduct directly to Spinosism; in fact, can any thing be more in + unison with the language of Spinosa himself, than to say, as does + Malebranche, "that the universe is only an emanation from God; that we see + every thing in God, that every thing we see is only God; that God alone + does every thing that is done; that all the action, with every operation + that takes place in nature, is God himself; in a word, that God is every + being and the only being." Is not this formally asserting that nature + herself is God? Moreover, at the same time Malebranche assures us we see + every thing in God, he pretends that it is not yet clearly demonstrated + that matter and bodies have existence; that faith alone teaches us these + mysteries, of which, without it, we should not have any knowledge + whatever. In reply, it might be a very fair question, how the existence of + the being who created matter can be demonstrated, if the existence of this + matter itself be yet a problem? He himself acknowledges "that we can have + no distinct demonstration of the existence of any other being than of that + which is necessary;" he further adds, "that if it be closely examined, it + will be seen, that it is not even possible to know with certitude, if God + be or be not truly the creator of a material, of a sensible world." + According to these notions, it is evident, that, following up the system + of Malebranche, man has only his faith to guarantee the existence of the + world; yet faith itself supposes its existence; if it be not, however, + certain that it does exist, and the Bishop of Cloyne, Dr. Berkeley, has + also held this in doubt, how shall we be persuaded that we must believe + the oracles which have been delivered to a visionary world? + </p> + <p> + On the other hand, these notions of Malebranche completely overturns all + the theological doctrines of free agency. How can the liberty of man's + action be reconciled with the idea that it is the Divinity who is the + immediate mover of nature; who actually gives impulse to matter and + bodies, without whose immediate interference nothing takes place; who + pre-determines his creatures to every thing they do? How can it be + pretended, if this doctrine is to be accredited, that human souls have the + faculty of forming thoughts—have the power of volition—are in + a condition to move themselves—have the capacity to modify their + existence? If it be supposed with the theologians, that the conservation + of the creatures in the universe is a continued creation, must it not + appear, that being thus perpetually recreated, they are enabled to commit + evil? It will then be a self-evident fact, that, admitting the system of + Malebranche, God does every thing, and that his creatures are no more than + passive instruments in his hands. Under this idea they could not be + answerable for their sins, because they would have no means of avoiding + them. Under this notion they could neither have merit or demerit; they + would be like a sharp instrument in their own hands, which whether it was + applied to a good or to an evil purpose, it would attach to themselves, + not to the instrument: this would annihilate all religion: it is thus that + theology is continually occupied with committing suicide. + </p> + <p> + Let us now see, if the immortal Newton, the great luminary of science, the + champion of astronomical truth, will afford us clearer notions, more + distinct ideas, more certain evidence of the existence of immaterial + substances. This great man, whose comprehensive genius unravelled nature, + whose capacious mind developed her laws, seems to have bewildered himself, + the instant he lost sight of them. A slave to the prejudices of his + infancy, he had not the courage to hold the lamp of his own enlightened + understanding to the agent theology has so gratuitously associated with + nature; he has not been able to allow that her own peculiar powers were + adequate to the production of that beautiful phenomena, he has with such + masterly talents so luminously explained. In short, the sublime Newton + himself becomes an infant when he quits physics, when he lays aside + demonstration, to lose himself in the devious sinuosities, in the + inextricable labyrinths, in the delusive regions of theology. This is the + manner in which he speaks of the Divinity: + </p> + <p> + "This God," says he, "governs all, not as the soul of the world, but as + the lord and sovereign of all things. It is in consequence of his + sovereignty that he is called the Lord God, [Greek letters], <i>pantokrator</i>, + the universal emperor. Indeed the word God is relative and relates itself + with slaves; the Deity is the dominion or the sovereignty of God, not over + his own body, as those think who look upon God as the soul of the world, + but over slaves." + </p> + <p> + From this it will be seen that Newton, as well as the theologians, makes + the Divinity a pure spirit, who presides over the universe as a monarch, + as a lord paramount; that is to say, what man defines in earthly + governors, despot, absolute princes, powerful monarchs, whose governments + have no model but their own will, who exercise an unlimited power over + their subjects, transformed into slaves; whom they usually compel to feel + in a very grievous manner the weight of their authority. But according to + the ideas of Newton, the world has not existed from eternity, the staves + of God have been formed in the course of time; from this it would be a + just inference, that before the creation of the world the god of Newton + was a sovereign without subjects. Let us see if this truly great + philosopher is more in unison with himself in the subsequent ideas which + he delivers on this subject. + </p> + <p> + "The supreme God," he says, "is an eternal, infinite, and absolutely + perfect being; but however perfect a being may be, if he has no + sovereignty he is not the supreme God. The word God signifies Lord, but + every lord is not god; it is the sovereignty of the spiritual Being which + constitutes God; it is the true sovereignty which constitutes the true + God; it is the supreme sovereignty which constitutes the supreme God; it + is a false sovereignty which constitutes a false god. From true + sovereignty, it follows, that the true God is living, intelligent, and + powerful; and from his other perfections, it follows, that he is supremely + or sovereignly perfect. He is eternal, infinite, omniscient; that is to + say, he exists from eternity, and will never have an end; he governs all, + and he knows every thing that is done, or that can be done. He is neither + eternity nor infinity, but he is eternal and infinite; he is not space or + duration, but he exists and is present." The term here used is <i>adest</i>, + which appears to have been placed there to avoid saying that God is + contained in space. + </p> + <p> + In all this unintelligible series, nothing is to be found but incredible + efforts to reconcile the theological attributes, the abstract with the + human qualities, which have been ascribed to the Divinity; we see in it + negative qualities, which can no longer be suitable to man, given, + however, to the Sovereign of nature, whom he has supposed a king. However + it may be, this picture always supposes the Supreme God to have occasion + for subjects to establish his sovereignty. It makes God stand in need of + man for the exercise of his empire; without these, according to the text, + he would not be a king; he could have had no empire when there was + nothing: but if this description of Newton was just, if it really + represented the Divinity, we might be very fairly permitted to ask, Does + not this Spiritual King exercise his spiritual empire in vain, upon + refractory beings, who do not at all times do that which he is willing + they should; who are continually struggling against his power; who spread + disorder in his states? This Spiritual Monarch, who is master of the + minds, of the souls, of the wills, of the passions of his slaves, does he + leave them the freedom of revolting against him? This infinite Monarch, + who fills every thing with his immensity, who governs all, does he also + govern the man who sins; does he direct his actions; is he in him when he + offends his God? The devil, the false god, the evil principle, hath he + not, according to this, a more extensive empire than the true God, whose + projects, if we are to believe the theologians, he is unceasingly + overturning? In earthly governments the true sovereign is generally + considered to be him whose power in a state influences the greater number + of his subjects. If, then, we could suppose him to be omnipresent, that + is, present in all places, should we not say he was the sad witness to all + the outrages committed against his authority, and we should not entertain + a very exalted opinion of his power if he permitted them to continue. + This, it is true, would be arguing upon a monarch of this world, still it + would be the language held by observers. + </p> + <p> + Is the spirituality of the Divinity well supported by those who say he + fills all space, who from that instant give him extent, ascribe to him + volume, make him correspond with the various points of space? This is the + very reverse of an immaterial substance. + </p> + <p> + "God is one," continues Newton, "and he is the same for ever, and every + where, not only by his virtue alone, or by his energy, but also by his + substance." But how are we to conceive that a being who is in continual + activity, who produces all the changes which beings undergo, can always be + himself the same? What is to be understood by either this virtue or this + energy? These are relative terms, which do not present any clear, distinct + idea to our mind, except as they apply to man: what are we, however, to + understand by the divine substance? If this substance be spiritual, that + is, devoid of extent, how can there exist in it any parts? How can it give + impulse to matter, how set it in motion? How can it even be conceived by + mortals? + </p> + <p> + Nevertheless Newton informs us, "that all things are contained in him, and + are moved in him, but without reciprocity of action: God experiences + nothing by the motion of bodies; these experience no resistance whatever + by his omnipresence." It would here appear that he clothes the Divinity + with that which bears the character of vacuum—of nothing; without + that, it would be almost impossible not to have a reciprocal action or + relation between these substances, which are either penetrated or + encompassed on all sides. It must be obvious, that in this instance our + scientific author does not distinctly understand himself. + </p> + <p> + He proceeds, "It is an incontestible truth, that God exists necessarily, + and the same necessity obliges to exist always and every where: from + whence it follows, that he is in every thing similar to itself; he is all + eyes, all ears, all brains, all arms, all feeling, all intelligence, all + action; but in a mode by no means human, by no means corporeal, and which + is totally unknown to us. In the same manner as a blind man has no idea of + colours, it is that we have no idea of the mode in which God feels and + understands." The necessary existence of the Divinity is precisely the + thing in question; it is this existence that it was needful to have + verified by proofs as clear, by evidence as distinct, by demonstration as + strong, as gravitation and attraction. One would have hardly thought it + possible the expansive capabilities of Newton would not have compassed it. + But oh, unrivalled genius! so mighty, so powerful, so colossal, while yet + you was a geometrician; so insignificant, so weak, so inconsistent; when + you became a theologian; that is to say, when you reasoned upon that which + can neither be calculated, nor submitted to experience; how could you + think of speaking to us on a subject which, by your own confession is to + you just what a picture is to a man born blind? Wherefore quit nature, + which had already explained to you so much? Why seek in imaginary spaces + those causes, those powers, that energy, which she would have distinctly + pointed out to you, had you been willing to have consulted her with your + usual sagacity? The gigantic, the intelligent Newton, suffers himself to + be hoodwinked—to be blinded by prejudice; he has not courage to look + a question fairly in the face, when that question involves notions which + habit has rendered sacred to him; he turns his eyes from truth, he casts + behind him his experience, he lulls to sleep his reason, when it becomes + necessary to probe opinions full of contradictions, yet fraught with the + best interests of humanity. + </p> + <p> + Let us, however, continue to examine how far the most transcendent genius + is capable of leading himself astray, when once he abandons experience, + when once he chains up his reason, when once he suffers himself to be + guided by his imagination. + </p> + <p> + "God," continues the father of modern philosophy, "is totally destitute of + body and of corporeal figure; here is the reason why he cannot be either + seen, touched, or understood; and ought not to be adored under any + corporeal form." What idea, however, can be formed of a being who is + resembled by nothing of which we have any knowledge? What are the + relations that can be supposed to exist between such very dissimilar + beings? When man renders this being his adoration, does he not, in fact, + in despite of himself, make him a being similar to his own species; does + he not suppose that, like himself, he is sensible to homage—to be + won by presents—gained by flattery; in short, he is treated like a + king of the earth, who exacts the respect, demands the fealty, requires + the obedience of all who are submitted to him. Newton adds, "we have ideas + of his attributes, but we do not know that it is any one substance; we + only see the figures and the colours of bodies; we only hear sounds; we + only touch the exterior surfaces; we only scent odours; we only taste + flavours: no one of our senses, no one of our reflections, can shew us the + intimate nature of substances: we have still less ideas of God." + </p> + <p> + If we have an idea of the attributes of God, it is only because we clothe + him with those which belong to ourselves; which we never do more than + aggrandize, which we only augment or exaggerate; we then mistake them for + those qualities with which we were at first acquainted. If in all those + substances which are pervious to our senses, we only know them by the + effects they produce on us, after which we assign them qualities, at least + these qualities are something tangible, they give birth to clear and + distinct ideas. This superficial knowledge, however slender it may be, + with which our senses furnish us, is the only one we can possibly have; + constituted as we are, we find ourselves under the necessity of resting + contented with it, and we discover that it is sufficient for our wants; + but we have not even the most superficial idea of immateriality, or a + substance distinguished from all those with which we have the slightest + acquaintance. Nevertheless, we hear men hourly reasoning upon it, + disputing about its properties, advancing its faculties, as if they had + the most demonstrable evidence of the fact; tearing each other in pieces, + because the one does not readily admit what the other asserts, upon a + subject which no man is competent to understand. + </p> + <p> + Our author goes on "We only have a knowledge of God by his attributes, by + his properties, by the excellent and wise arrangement which he has given + to all things, and by their FINAL CAUSES: we admire him in consequence of + his perfections." I repeat, that we have no real knowledge of the + Divinity; that we borrow his attributes from ourselves; but it is evident + these cannot be suitable to the Universal Being, who neither can have the + same nature nor the same properties as particular beings; it is + nevertheless after ourselves that we assign him intelligence, wisdom, + perfection, in subtracting from them what we call defects. As to the + order, or the arrangement of the universe, man finds it excellent, esteems + it the perfection of wisdom, as long as it is favorable to his species; or + when the causes which are co-existent with himself do not disturb his own + peculiar existence; otherwise he is apt to complain of confusion, and + final causes vanish: he then attributes to an immutable God, motives + equally borrowed from his own peculiar mode of action, for deranging the + beautiful order he so much admires in the universe. Thus it is always in + himself, that is, in his own individual mode of feeling, that he draws up + the ideas of the order, the wisdom, the excellence, the perfection which + he ascribes to the Deity; whilst the good as well as the evil which take + place in the world, are the necessary consequence of the essence of + things; of the general, immutable laws of nature; in short, of the + gravitation, of the repulsion of matter; of those unchangeable laws of + motion, which Newton himself has so ably thrown into light; but which he + has by a strange fatuity forborne to apply when the question was + concerning the cause of these phenomena, which prejudice has refused to + the capabilities of nature. He goes on, "We revere, and we adore God, on + account of his sovereignty: we worship him like his slaves; a God + destitute of sovereignty, of providence, and of final causes, would be no + more than nature and destiny." It is true that superstition enjoins man to + adore its gods like ignorant slaves, who tremble under a master whom they + know not; he certainly prays to them on all occasions, sometimes + requesting nothing less than an entire change in the essence of things, to + gratify his capricious desires, and it is perhaps well for him they are + not competent to grant his request: in the origin, as we have shewn, these + gods were nothing more than nature acting by necessary laws, clothed under + a variety of fables; or necessity personified under a multitude of names. + However this may be, we do not believe that true religion, that sterling + worship which renders man grateful, whilst it exalts the majesty of the + Divinity, requires any such meanness from man that he should act like a + slave; he is rather expected to sit down to the banquet prepared for him, + with all the dignity of an invited guest; under the cheering consciousness + of a welcome that is never accorded to slaves; nothing is required at his + hands, but that he should conduct himself temperately in the + banquetting-house; that he should be grateful for the good cheer he + receives; that he should have virtue; (which we have already sufficiently + explained is to render himself useful, by making others happy); that he + should not by pertinaciously setting up whimsical opinions, and insisting + on their adoption by his neighbour, disturb the harmony of the feast; that + he should be sufficiently intelligent to know when he is really + felicitous, and not seek to put down the gaiety of his fellow guests; but + that he should rise from the board satisfied with himself, contented with + others; in short, to comprise the whole in a trite axiom of one of the + Greek philosophers, he should learn the invaluable secret, "to <i>bear</i> + and <i>forbear</i>." + </p> + <p> + But to proceed. Newton tells us, "that from a physical and blind + necessity, which should preside every where, and be always the same, there + could not emanate any variety in the beings; the diversity which we + behold, could only have its origin in the ideas and in the will of a being + which exists necessarily;" but wherefore should not this diversity spring + out of natural causes, from matter acting upon matter; the action of which + either attracts and combines various yet analogous elements, or else + separates beings by the intervention of those substances which have not a + disposition to unite? Is not bread the result of the combination of flour, + yeast and water? As for the blind necessity, as it is elsewhere said, we + must acknowledge it is that of which we are ignorant, either of its + properties or its energies; of which being blind ourselves we have no + knowledge of its mode of action. Philosophers explain all the phenomena + that occur by the properties of matter; and though they feel the want of a + more intimate acquaintance with natural causes, they do not therefore the + less believe them deducible from these properties or these causes. Are, + therefore, the philosophers atheists, because they do not reply, it is God + who is the author of these effects? Is the industrious workman, who makes + gunpowder, to be challenged as an atheist, because he says the terrible + effects of this destructive material, which inspired the native Americans + with such awe, which raised in their winds such wonder, are to be ascribed + to the junction of the apparently harmless substances of nitre, charcoal + and sulpher, set in activity by the accession of trivial scintillations, + produced from the collision of steel with flint, merely because some + bigoted <i>Priest of the Sun</i>, who is ignorant of the composition, + chooses to think it is not possible such a striking phenomenon could be + the work of any thing short of the secret agents, whom he has himself + appointed to govern the world? + </p> + <p> + "It is allegorically said that God sees, hears, speaks, smiles, loves, + hates, desires, gives, receives, rejoices, grows angry, fights, makes, or + fashions, &c. because all that is said of God, is borrowed from the + conduct of man, by an imperfect analogy." Man has not been able to act + otherwise, for want of being acquainted with nature and her eternal + course: whenever he has imagined a peculiar energy which he has not been + able to fathom, he has given it the name of God; and he has then made him + act upon the self-same principles, as he himself would adopt, according to + which he would act if he was the master. It is from this proneness to <i>Theanthropy</i>, + that has flowed all those absurd, and frequently dangerous ideas, upon + which are founded the superstitions of the world; who all adore in their + gods either natural causes of which they are ignorant, or else powerful + mortals of whose malice they stand in awe. The sequel will shew the fatal + effects that have resulted to mankind from the absurd ideas they have very + frequently formed to themselves of the Divinity; that nothing could be + more degrading to him, more injurious to themselves, than the idea of + comparing him to an absolute sovereign, to a despot, to a tyrant. For the + present let us continue to examine the proofs offered in support of their + various systems. + </p> + <p> + It is unceasingly repeated that the regular action, the invariable order, + which reigns in the universe, the benefits heaped upon mortals, announce a + wisdom, an intelligence, a goodness, which we cannot refuse to + acknowledge, in the cause which produces these marvellous effects. To this + we must reply, that it is unquestionably true that not only these things, + but all the phenomena he beholds, indicate the existence of something + gifted very superiorly to erring man; the great question, however, is one + that perhaps will never be solved, what is this being? Is this question + answered by heaping together the estimable qualities of man? Speaking with + relation to ourselves, which is all that the theologian really does, + although in such numerous regions he pretends to do a great deal more, we + can apply the terms goodness, wisdom, intelligence, the best with which we + are acquainted, to this being for the want of having those that may be + appropriate; but I maintain, this does not, in point of fact, afford us + one single idea of the <i>Great Cause of causes</i>; we admire his works; + and knowing that what we approve highly in our own species, we attribute + to their being wise, we say the Divinity displays wisdom. So far it is + well; but this, after all, is a human quality. If we consult experience, + we shall presently be convinced that our wisdom does not bear the least + affinity to the actions attributed to the Divinity. To get at this a + little closer, we must endeavour to find out what we do not call wisdom in + man; this will help us to form an estimate, how very incompetent we are to + describe the qualities of a being that differs so very materially from + ourselves. We most certainly should not call him a wise man, who having + built a beautiful residence, should himself set it on fire; and thus + destroy what he had laboured so much to bring to perfection: yet this + happens every day in nature, without its being in any manner a warrantry + for us to charge her with folly. If therefore we were to form our + judgments after our own puny ideas of wisdom, what should we say? Why, in + point of fact, just what the man does, who, thinking he has had too much + rain, implores fine weather? Which, properly translated, is neither more + nor less than giving the Divinity to understand he best knows what is + proper for himself. The just, the only fair inference to be drawn from + this, is, that we positively know nothing about the matter; that those who + pretend they do, would, if it was upon any other subject, he suspected of + having an unsound mind. We do not mean to insist that we are in the right, + but we mean to aver that the object of this work is not so much either to + build up new systems, or to put down old ones, as by shewing man the + inconclusiveness of his reasonings upon matters not accessible to his + comprehension—to induce him to be more tolerant to his neighbour—to + invite him to be less rancorous against those who do not see with his eyes—to + hold forth to him motives for forbearance, against those whose system of + faith may not exactly harmonize with his own—to render him less + ferocious in support of opinions, which, if he will but discard his + prejudices, he may find not so solidly bottomed as he imagines. All we + know is scarcely more than that the motion we witness in the universe is + the necessary consequence of the laws of matter; that the uniformity of + this motion is evidence of their immutability; that it is not too much to + say it cannot cease to act in the manner it does, as long as the same + causes operate, governed by the same circumstances. We evidently see that + motion, however regular in our mind, that order, however beautiful to our + admiring optics, yields to what we term disorder, to that which we + designate frightful confusion, as soon as new causes, not analogous to the + preceding, either disturb or suspend their action. We further know that a + better knowledge of nature, the consequence of time, the result of + patient, laborious, physical researches, with the comparison of facts and + the application of experience, has enabled man in many instances to divert + from himself the evil effects of inevitable causes, which anterior to + these discoveries overwhelmed his unhappy progenitors with ruin. How far + these salutary developements are to be carried by industry, what may be + achieved by honesty, what light is to be gathered from the recession of + prejudice, the wisest among men is not competent to decide. Certain it is, + that phenomena which for ages were supposed to denounce the anger of the + Deity against mankind, are now well understood to be common effects of + natural causes. + </p> + <p> + Order, as we have elsewhere shewn, is only the effects which result to + ourselves from a series of motion; there cannot be any disorder relatively + to the great whole; in which all that takes place is necessary; in which + every thing is determined by laws which nothing can change. The order of + nature may be damaged or destroyed relatively to ourselves, but it is + never contradicted relatively to herself, since she cannot act otherwise + than she does: if we attribute to her the evils we sustain, we are equally + obliged to acknowledge we owe to her the good we experience. + </p> + <p> + It in said, that animals furnish a convincing proof of the powerful cause + of their existence; that the admirable harmony of their parts, the mutual + assistance they lend each other, the regularity with which they fulfill + their functions, the preservation of these parts, the conservation of such + complicated wholes, announce a workman who unites wisdom with power; in + short, whole tracts of anatomy and botany have been copied to prove + nothing more than that these things exist, for of the power that produced + them there cannot remain a doubt. We shall never learn more from these + erudite tracts, save that there exists in nature certain elements with an + aptitude to attraction; a disposition to unite, suitable to form wholes, + to induce combinations capable of producing very striking effects. To be + surprised that the brain, the heart, the arteries, the veins, the eyes, + the ears of an animal, act as we see them—that the roots of plants + attract juices, or that trees produce fruit, is to be surprised that a + tree, a plant, or an animal exists at all. These beings would not exist, + or would no longer be that which we know they are, if they ceased to act + as they do: this is what happens when they die. If the formation, the + combination, the modes of action, variously possessed by these beings, if + their conservation for a season, followed by their destruction or + dissolution, prove any thing, it is the immutability of those laws which + operate in nature: we cannot doubt the power of nature; she produces all + the animals we behold, by the combination, of matter, continually in + motion; the harmony that subsists between the component parts of these + beings, is a consequence of the necessary laws of their nature, and of + that which results from their combination. As soon as this accord ceases, + the animal is necessarily destroyed: from this we must conclude that every + mutation in nature is necessary; is only a consequence of its laws; that + it could not be otherwise than it is, under the circumstances in which it + is placed. + </p> + <p> + Man, who looks upon himself as the <i>chef d'oeuvre</i>, furnishes more + than any other production a proof of the immutability of the laws of + nature: in this sensible, intelligent, thinking being, whose vanity leads + him to believe himself the sole object of the divine predilection, who + forms his God after his own peculiar model, we see only a more inconstant, + a more brittle machine; one more subject to be deranged by its extreme + complication, than the grosser beings: beasts destitute of our knowledge, + plants that vegetate, stones devoid of feeling, are in many respects + beings more highly favored than man: they are at least exempted from the + sorrows of the mind—from the torments of reflection—from that + devouring, chagrin to which he is so frequently a prey. Who is he who + would not be a plant or a stone, every time reminiscence forces upon his + imagination the irreparable loss of a beloved object? Would it not be + better to be an inanimate mass, than a restless, turbulent, superstitious + being, who does nothing but tremble under the imaginary displeasure of + beings of his own creation; who to support his own gloomy opinions, + immolates his fellow creatures at the shrine of his idol; who ravages the + country, and deluges the earth with the blood of those who happen to + differ from him on a speculative point of an unintelligible creed? Beings + destitute of life, bereft of feeling, without memory, not having the + faculties of thought, at least are not afflicted by the idea of either the + past, the present, or the future; they do not at any rate believe + themselves in danger of becoming eternally unhappy, because they way have + reasoned badly; or because they happened to be born in a land where truth + has never yet shed its refulgent beams on the darkened mind of perplexed + mortals. + </p> + <p> + Let it not then be said that we cannot have an idea of a work, without + also having an idea of the workman, as distinguished from his work: the + savage, when he first beheld the terrible operation of gunpowder, did not + form the most distant idea that it was the work of a man like himself. + Nature is not to be contemplated as a work of this kind; she is + self-existent. In her bosom every thing is produced: she is an immense + elaboratory, provided with materials, who makes the instruments of which + she avails herself in her operations. All her works are the effects of her + own energies; of those agents which she herself produces; of those + immutable laws by which she sets every thing in activity. Eternal, + indestructible elements, ever in motion, combine themselves variously, and + thus give birth to all beings, to all the phenomena which fill the weak + eyes of erring mortals with wonder and dismay; to all the effects, whether + good or bad, of which man experiences the influence; to all the + vicissitudes he undergoes, from the moment of his birth until that of his + death; to order and to confusion, which he never discriminates but by the + various modes in which he is affected: in short, to all those miraculous + spectacles with which he occupies his meditation—upon which he + exercises his reason—which frequently spread consternation over the + surface of the earth. These elements need nothing when circumstances + favour their junction, save their own peculiar properties, whether + individual or united, with the motion that is essential to them, to + produce all those phenomena which powerfully striking the senses of + mankind, either fill him with admiration, or stagger him with alarm. + </p> + <p> + But supposing for a moment that it was impossible to conceive the work, + without also conceiving the workman, who watches over his work, where must + we place this workman? Shall it be interior or exterior to his production? + Is he matter and motion, or is he only space or the vacuum? In all these + cases either he would be nothing, or he would be contained in nature: as + nature contains only matter and motion, it must be concluded that the + agent who moves it is material; that he is corporeal; if this agent be + exterior to nature, then we can no longer form any idea of the place which + he occupieth: neither can we better conceive an immaterial being; nor the + mode in which a spirit without extent can act upon matter from which it is + separated. These unknown spaces, which imagination has placed beyond the + visible world, can have no existence for a being, who with difficulty sees + down to his feet; he cannot paint to his mind any image of the power which + inhabit them; but if he is compelled to form some kind of a picture, he + must combine at random the fantastical colours which he is ever obliged to + draw from the world he inhabits: in this case he will really do no more + than reproduce in idea, part or parcels of that which he has actually + seen; he will form a whole which perhaps has no existence in nature, but + which it will be in vain he strives to distinguish from her; to place out + of her bosom. When he shall be ingenuous with himself, When he shall be no + longer willing to delude others, he will be obliged to acknowledge, that + the portrait he has painted, although in its combination it resembles + nothing in the universe, is nevertheless in all its constituent members an + exact delineation of that which nature presents to our view. Hobbes in his + <i>Leviathan</i> says, "The universe, the whole mass of things, is + corporeal, that is to say, body; and hath the dimensions of magnitude, + namely, length, breadth, and depth: also every part of body is likewise + body, and hath the like dimensions; and consequently every part of the + universe is body; and that which is not body, is no part of the universe; + and because the universe is all, that which is no part of it is nothing; + and consequently no where: nor does it follow from hence, that spirits are + nothing, for they have dimensions, and are therefore really bodies; though + that name in common speech be given to such bodies only as are visible, or + palpable, that is, that have some degree of opacity: but for spirits they + call them incorporeal; which is a name of more honour, and may therefore + with more piety be attributed to God himself, in whom we consider not what + attribute expresseth best his nature, which is incomprehensible; but what + best expresseth our desire to honour him." + </p> + <p> + It will be insisted that if a statue or a watch were shewn to a savage, + who had never before seen either, he would not be able to prevent himself + from acknowledging that these things were the works of some intelligent + agent of greater ability, possessing more industry than himself: it will + be concluded from thence, that we are in like manner obliged to + acknowledge that the universe, that man, that the various phenomena, are + the works of an agent, whose intelligence is more comprehensive, whose + power far surpasses our own. Granted: who has ever doubted it? the + proposition is self-evident; it cannot admit of even a cavil. Nevertheless + we reply, in the <i>first place</i>, that it is not to be doubted that + nature is extremely powerful; diligently industrious: we admire her + activity every time we are surprised by the extent, every time we + contemplate the variety, every time we behold those complicated effects + which are displayed in her works; or whenever we take the pains to + meditate upon them: nevertheless, she is not really more industrious in + one of her works than she is in another; she is not fathomed with more + ease in those we call her most contemptible productions, than she is in + her most sublime efforts: we no more understand how she has been capable + of producing a stone or a metal, than the means by which she organized a + head like that of the illustrious Newton. We call that man industrious who + can accomplish things which we cannot; nature is competent to every thing: + as soon therefore as a thing exists, it is a proof she has been capable of + producing it: but it is never more than relatively to ourselves that we + judge beings to be industrious: we then compare them to ourselves; and as + we enjoy a quality which we call intelligence, by the assistance of which + we accomplish things, by which we display our diligence, we naturally + conclude from it, that those works which most astonish us, do not belong + to her, but are to be ascribed to an intelligent being like ourselves, but + in whom we make the intelligence commensurate with the astonishment these + phenomena excite in us; that is to say, in other words, to our own + peculiar ignorance, and the weakness incident to our nature. + </p> + <p> + In the <i>second place</i>, we must observe, that the savage, to whom + either the statue or the watch is brought, will or will not have ideas of + human industry: if he has ideas of it, he will feel that this watch or + this statue, way be the work of a being of his own species, enjoying + faculties of which he is himself deficient: if he has no idea of it, if he + has no comprehension of the resources of human art, when he beholds the + spontaneous motion of the watch, he will be impressed with the belief that + it is an animal, which cannot be the work of man. Multiplied experience + confirms this mode of thinking which is ascribed to the savage. The + Peruvians mistook the Spaniards for gods, because they made use of + gunpowder, rode on horseback, and came in vessels which sailed quite + alone. The inhabitants of the island of Tenian being ignorant of fire + before the arrival of Europeans, the first time they saw it, conceived it + to be an animal who devoured the wood. Thus it is, that the savage, in the + same manner as many great and learned men, who believe themselves much + more acute, will attribute the strange effects that strike his organs, to + a genius or to a spirit; that is to say, to an unknown power; to whom he + will ascribe capabilities of which he believes the beings of his own + species are entirely destitute: by this he will prove nothing, except that + he is himself ignorant of what man is capable of producing. It is thus + that a raw unpolished people raise their eyes to heaven, every time they + witness some unusual phenomenon. It is thus that the people denominate all + those strange effects, with the natural causes of which they are ignorant, + miraculous, supernatural, divine; but these are not by reasonable persons + therefore considered proofs of what they assert: as the multitude are + generally unacquainted with the cause of any thing, every object becomes a + miracle in their eyes; at least they imagine God is the immediate cause of + the good they enjoy—of the evil they suffer. In short, it is thus + that the theologians themselves solve every difficulty that starts in + their road; they ascribe to God all those phenomena, of the causes of + which either they are themselves ignorant, or else unwilling that man + should be acquainted with the source. + </p> + <p> + In the <i>third place</i>, the savage, in opening the watch, and examining + its parts, will perhaps feel, that this machinery announces a work which + can only be the result of human labour. He will perhaps perceive, that + they very obviously differ from the immediate productions of nature, whom + he has not observed to produce wheels made of polished metal. He will + further notice, perhaps, that these parts when separated, no longer act as + they did when they were combined; that the motion he so much admired, + ceases when their union is broken. After these observations, he will + attribute the watch to the ingenuity of man; that is to say, to a being + like himself, of whom he has some ideas, but whom he judges capable to + construct machines to which he is himself utterly incompetent. In short, + he will ascribe the honour of his watch to a being known to him in some + respects, provided with faculties very far superior to his own; but he + will be at an immense distance from the belief, that this material work, + whose ingenuity pleases him so much, can be the effect of an immaterial + cause; or of an agent destitute of organs, without extent; whose action + upon material beings cannot be within, the sphere of his comprehension. + Nevertheless, man, when he cannot embrace the causes of things, does not + scruple to insist that they are impossible to be the production of nature, + although he is entirely ignorant how far the powers of this nature extend; + to what her capabilities are equal. In viewing the world, we must + acknowledge material causes for many of those phenomena which take place + in it; those who study nature are continually adding fresh discoveries to + this list of physical causes; science, as she enriches the intellectual + stores of human enjoyment, every day throws a broader light on the + energies of nature, which <i>prejudice</i>, aided by its almost + inseparable companion, <i>ignorance</i>, would for ever bind down in the + fetters of impotence. + </p> + <p> + Let us not, however, be told, that pursuing this hypothesis, we attribute + every thing to a blind cause—to the fortuitous concurrence of atoms—to + chance. Those only are called blind causes of which we know not either the + combination, the laws, or the power. Those effects are called fortuitous, + with whose causes man is unacquainted; to which his experience affords him + no clue; which his ignorance prevents him from foreseeing. All those + effects, of which he does not see the necessary connection with their + causes, he attributes to chance. Nature is not a blind cause; she never + acts by chance; nothing that she does would ever be considered fortuitous, + by him who should understand her mode of action—who had a knowledge + of her resources—who was intelligent in her ways. Every thing that + she produces is strictly necessary—is never more than a consequence + of her eternal, immutable laws; all is connected in her by invisible + bonds; every effect we witness flows necessarily from its cause, whether + we are in a condition to fathom it, or whether we are obliged to let it + remain hidden from our view. It is very possible there should be ignorance + on our part; but the words spirit, intelligence, will not remedy this + ignorance; they will rather redouble it, by arresting our research; by + preventing us from conquering those impediments which obstruct us in + probing the natural causes of the effects, with which our visual faculties + bring us acquainted. + </p> + <p> + This may serve for an answer to the clamour of those who raise perpetual + objections to the partizans of nature, by unceasingly accusing them with + attributing every thing to chance. Chance is a word devoid of sense, which + furnishes no substantive idea; at least it indicates only the ignorance of + its employers. Nevertheless, we are triumphantly told, it is reiterated + continually, that a regular work cannot be ascribed to the concurrence of + chance. Never, we are informed, will it be possible to arrive at the + formation of a poem such as the Iliad, by means of letters thrown together + promiscuously or combined at random. We agree to it without hesitation; + but, ingenuously, are the letters which compose a poem thrown with the + hand in the manner of dice? It would avail as much to say, we could not + pronounce a discourse with the feet. It is nature, who combines according + to necessary laws, under given circumstances, a head organized in a mode + suitable to bring forth a poem: it is nature who assembles the elements, + which furnish man with a brain competent to give birth to such a work: it + is nature, who, through the medium of the imagination, by means of the + passions, in consequence of the temperament which she bestows upon man, + capacitates him to produce such a masterpiece of fancy; such a + never-fading effort of the mind: it is his brain modified in a certain + manner, crowded with ideas, decorated with images, made fruitful by + circumstances, that alone can become the matrix in which a poem can be + conceived—in which the matter of it can be digested: this is the + only womb whose activity could usher to an admiring world, the sublime + stanzas which develope the story of the unfortunate Priam, and immortalize + their author. A head organized like that of Homer, furnished with the same + vigour, glowing with the same vivid imagination, enriched with the same + erudition, placed under the same circumstances, would necessarily, and not + by chance, produce the poem of the Iliad; at least, unless it be denied + that causes similar in every thing must produce effects perfectly + identical. We should without doubt be surprised, if there were in a + dice-box a hundred thousand dice, to see a hundred thousand sixes follow + in succession; but if these dice were all cogged or loaded, our surprise + would cease: the particles of matter may be compared to cogged dice, that + is to say, always producing certain determinate effects under certain + given circumstances; these particles being essentially varied in + themselves, countless in their combinations, they are cogged in myriads of + different modes. The head of Homer, or of Virgil, was no more than an + assemblage of particles, possessing peculiar properties; or if they will, + of dice cogged by nature; that is to say, of beings so combined, of matter + so wrought, as to produce the beautiful poems of the Iliad or the Aeneid. + As much may be said of all other productions: indeed, what are men + themselves but cogged dice—machines into which nature has infused + the bias requisite to produce effects of a certain description? A man of + genius produces a good work, in the same manner as a tree of a good + species, placed in a prolific soil, cultivated with care, grafted with + judgment, produces excellent fruit. + </p> + <p> + Then is it not either knavery or puerility, to talk of composing a work by + scattering letters with the hand; by promiscuously mingling characters; or + gathering together by chance, that which can only result from a human + brain, with a peculiar organization, modified after a certain manner? The + principle of human generation does not develope itself by chance; it + cannot be nourished with effect, expanded into life, but in the womb of a + woman: a confused heap of characters, a jumble of symbols, is nothing more + than an assemblage of signs, whose proper arrangement is adequate to paint + human ideas; but in order that these ideas may be correctly delineated, it + is previously requisite that they should have been conceived, combined, + nourished, connected, and developed in the brain of a poet; where + circumstances make them fructify, mature them, and bring them forth in + perfection, by reason of the fecundity, generated by the genial warmth and + the peculiar energy of the matrix, in which these intellectual seeds shall + have been placed. Ideas in combining, expanding, connecting, and + associating themselves, form a whole, like all the other bodies of nature: + this whole affords us pleasure, becomes a source of enjoyment, when it + gives birth to agreeable sensations in the mind; when it offers to our + examination pictures calculated to move us in a lively manner. It is thus + that the history of the Trojan war, as digested in the head of Homer, + ushered into the world with all the fascinating harmony of numbers + peculiar to himself, has the power of giving a pleasurable impulse to + heads, who by their analogy with that of this incomparable Grecian, are in + a capacity to feel its beauties. + </p> + <p> + From this it will be obvious, that nothing can be produced by chance; that + no effect can exist without an adequate cause for its existence; that the + one must ever be commensurate with the other. All the works of nature grow + out of the uniform action of invariable laws, whether our mind can with + facility follow the concatenation of the successive causes which operate; + or whether, as in her more complicated productions, we find ourselves in + the impossibility of distinguishing the various springs which she sets in + motion to give birth to her phenomena. To nature, the difficulty is not + more to produce a great poet, capable of writing an admirable poem, than + to form a glittering stone or a shining metal which gravitates towards a + centre. The mode she adopts to give birth to these various beings, is + equally unknown to us, when we have not meditated upon it; frequently the + most sedulous attention, the most patient investigation affords us no + information; sometimes, however, the unwearied industry of the philosopher + is rewarded, by throwing into light the most mysterious operations. Thus + the keen penetration of a Newton, aided by uncommon diligence, developed + the starry system, which, for so many thousand years, had eluded the + research of all the astronomers by whom he was preceded. Thus the sagacity + of a Harvey giving vigour to his application, brought out of the obscurity + in which for almost countless centuries it had been buried, the true + course pursued by the sanguinary fluid, when circulating through the veins + and arteries of man, giving activity to his machine, diffusing life + through his system, and enabling him to perform those actions which so + frequently strike an astonished world with wonder and regret. Thus + Gallileo, by a quickness of perception, a depth of reasoning peculiar to + himself, held up to an admiring world, the actual form and situation of + the planet we inhabit; which until then had escaped the observation of the + most profound geniuses—the most subtle metaphysicians—the + whole host of priests; which when first promulgated was considered so + extraordinary, so contradictory to all the then received opinions, either + sacred or profane, that he was ranked as an atheist, as an impious + blasphemer, to hold communion with whom, would secure to the communers a + place in the regions of everlasting torment; in short, it was held an + heresy of such an indelible dye, that notwithstanding the infallibility of + his sacred function, Pope Gregory, who then filled the papal chair, + excommunicated all those who had the temerity to accredit so abominable a + doctrine. + </p> + <p> + Man is born by the necessary concurrence of those elements suitable to his + construction; he increases in bulk, corroborates his system, expands his + powers, in the same manner as a plant or a stone; which as well as + himself, are augmented in their volume, invigorated in their capabilities, + by the addition of homogeneous matter, that exists within the sphere of + their attraction. Man feels, thinks, receives ideas, acts after a certain + manner, that is to say, according to his organic structure, which is + peculiar to himself; that renders him susceptible of modifications, of + which the stone and the plant are utterly incapable. On the other hand, + the organization of these beings is of a nature to enable them to receive + other modifications, which man is not more capacitated to experience, than + the stone or the plant are those which constitute him what he is. In + consequence of this peculiar arrangement, the man of genius produces works + of merit; the plant when it is healthy yields delicious fruits the stone + when it is placed in a suitable matrix possesses a glittering brilliance + which dazzles the eyes of mortals; each in their sphere of action both + surprise and delight us; because we feel that they excite in us + sensations, that harmonize with what we call order; in consequence of the + pleasure they infuse, by the rarity, by the magnitude, and by the variety + of the effects which they occasion us to experience. Nevertheless, that + which is found most admirable in the productions of nature, that which is + most esteemed in the actions of man, most highly valued in animals, most + sought after in vegetation, most in request among fossils, is never more + than the natural effects of the different particles of matter, diversely + arranged, variously combined, submitted to numerous modifications; from + matter thus united result organs, brains, temperament, taste, talents, all + the multifarious properties, all the multitudinous qualities, which + discriminate the beings whose multiplied activity make up the sum of what + is designated animated nature. + </p> + <p> + Nature then produces nothing but what is necessary; it is not by + fortuitous combinations, by chance throws, that she exhibits to our view + the beings we behold; all her throws are sure, all the causes she employs + have infallibly their effects. Whenever she gives birth to extraordinary, + marvellous, rare beings, it is, that the requisite order of things the + concurrence of the necessary productive causes, happens but seldom. As + soon as those beings exist, they are to be ascribed to nature, equally + with the most familiar of her productions; to nature every thing is + equally possible, equally facile, when she assembles together the + instruments or the causes necessary to act. Thus it seems presumption in + man to set limits to the powers of nature, which he so very imperfectly + understands. The combinations, or if they will, the throws that she makes + in an eternity of existence, can easily produce all the beings that have + existed: her eternal march must necessarily bring forth, again and again, + the most astonishing circumstances; the most rare occurrences; those most + calculated to rouse the wonder, to elicit the admiration of beings, who + are only in a condition to give them a momentary consideration; who can + get nothing more than a glimpse, without ever having either the leisure or + the means to search into causes, which lie hid from their weak eyes, in + the depths of Cimmerian obscurity. Countless throws during eternity, with + elements and combinations varied almost to infinity, quite with relation + to man, suffice to produce every thing of which he has a knowledge, with + multitudes of other effects, of which he will never have the least + conception. + </p> + <p> + Thus, we cannot too often repeat to the metaphysicians, to the supporters + of immateriality, to the inconsistent theologians, who commonly ascribe to + their adversaries the most ridiculous opinions, in order to obtain an + easy, short-lived triumph in the prejudiced eyes of the multitude; or in + the stagnant minds of those who never examine deeply; that chance is + nothing but a word, as well as many other words, imagined solely to cover + the ignorance of those to whom the course of nature is inexplicable—to + shield the idleness of others who are too slothful to seek into the + properties of acting causes. It is not chance that has produced the + universe, it is self-existent; nature exists necessarily from all + eternity: she is omnipotent because every thing is produced by her + energies; she is omnipresent, because she fills all space; she is + omniscient, because every thing can only be what it actually is; she is + immovable, because as a whole she cannot be displaced; she is immutable, + because her essence cannot change, although her forms may vary; she is + infinite, because she cannot have any bounds; she is all perfect, because + she contains every thing: in short, she has all the abstract qualities of + the metaphysician, all the moral faculties of the theologian, without + involving any contradiction, since that which is the assemblage of all, + must of necessity contain the properties of all. + </p> + <p> + However concealed may be her ways, the existence of nature is indubitable; + her mode of action is in some respects known to us. Experience amply + demonstrates we might, if we were more industrious, become better + acquainted with her secrets; but with an immaterial substance, with a pure + spirit, the mind of man can never become familiar: he has no means by + which he can picture to himself this incomprehensible, this inconceivable + quality: in despite therefore of the roundness of assertion adopted by the + theologian, notwithstanding all the subtilties of the metaphysician, it + will always be for man, while he remains such as he now is, in the + language of Doctor Samuel Clarke, that, <i>of which nothing can with truth + be affirmed</i>. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0008" id="link2H_4_0008"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. VI. + </h2> + <h3> + <i>Of Pantheism; or of the Natural Ideas of the Divinity.</i> + </h3> + <p> + The false principle that matter is not self-existent; that by its nature + it is in an impossibility to move itself; consequently incompetent to the + production of those striking phenomena which arrest our wondering eyes in + the wide expanse of the universe; it will be obvious, to all who seriously + attend to what has preceded, is the origin of the proofs upon which + theology rests the existence of immateriality. After these suppositions, + as gratuitous as they are erroneous, the fallacy of which we have exposed + elsewhere, it has been believed that matter did not always exist, but that + its existence, as well as its motion, is a production of time; due to a + cause distinguished from itself; to an unknown agent to whom it is + subordinate. As man finds in his own species a quality which he calls + intelligence, which presides over all his actions, by the aid of which he + arrives at the end he proposes to himself; he has clothed this invisible + agent with this quality, which he has extended beyond the limits of his + own conception: he magnified it thus, because, having made him the author + of effects of which he found himself incapable, he did not conceive it + possible that the intelligence he himself possessed, unless it was + prodigiously amplified, would be sufficient to account for those + productions, to which his erring judgment led him to conclude the natural + energy of physical causes were not adequate. + </p> + <p> + As this agent was invisible, as his mode of action was inconceivable, he + made him a spirit, a word that really means nothing more than that he is + ignorant of his essence, or that he acts like the breath of which he + cannot trace the motion. Thus, in speaking of spirituality, he designated + an occult quality, which he deemed suitable to a concealed being, whose + mode of action was always imperceptible to the senses. It would appear, + however, that originally the word spirit was not meant to designate + immateriality; but a matter of a more subtile nature than that which acted + coarsely on the organs: still of a nature capable of penetrating the + grosser matter—of communicating to it motion—of instilling + into it active life—of giving birth to those combinations—of + imparting to them those modifications, which his organic structure + rendered him competent to discover. Such was, as has been shewn, that + all-powerful Jupiter, who in the theology of the ancients, was originally + destined to represent the etherial, subtile matter that penetrates, + vivifies, and gives activity to all the bodies of which nature is the + common assemblage. + </p> + <p> + It would be grossly deceiving ourselves to believe that the idea of + spirituality, such as the subtilty of dreaming metaphysicians present it + in these days, was that which offered itself to our forefathers in the + early stages of the human mind. This immateriality, which excludes all + analogy with any thing but itself—which bears no resemblance to any + thing of which man is capacitated to have a knowledge, was, as we have + already observed, the slow, the tardy fruit of his imagination, after he + had quitted experience, and renounced his reason. Men reared in luxurious + leisure, unceasingly meditating, without the assistance of those natural + helps with which attentive observation would have furnished them, by + degrees arrived at the formation of this incomprehensible quality, which + is so fugitive, that although man has been compelled to reverence it, to + accredit it against all the evidence of his senses, they have never yet + been enabled to give any other explanation of its nature, than by using a + term to which it is impossible to attach any intelligible idea. Seraphis + said, with tears in his eyes, "that in making him adopt the opinion of + spirituality, they had deprived him of his God." Many fathers of the + church have given a human form to the Divinity, and treated all those as + heretics who made him spiritual. Thus by dint of reasoning, by force of + subtilizing, the word spirit no longer presents any one image upon which + the mind can fix itself; when they are desirous to speak of it, it becomes + impossible to understand them, seeing that each visionary paints it after + his own manner; and in the portrait he forms, consults only his own + temperament, follows nothing but his own imagination, adopts nothing but + his own peculiar reveries; the only point in which they are at all in + unison, is in assigning to it inconceivable qualities, which they + naturally enough believe are best suited to the incomprehensible beings + they have delineated: from the incompatible heap of these qualities, + generally resulted a whole, whose existence they thus rendered impossible. + In short, this word, which has occupied the research of so many learned + and intelligent men; which is considered of such importance to mankind, + has been, in consequence of theological reveries, always fluctuating: + these never bearing the least resemblance to each other, it has become + destitute of any fixed sense, a mere sound, to which each who echoes it + affixes his own peculiar ideas, which are never in harmony with those of + his neighbour; which indeed are not even steady in himself, but like the + camelion, assume the colour of every differing circumstance. This + unintelligible word has been substituted for the more intelligible one of + matter; man, when clothed with power, has entertained the most rancorous + antipathies, pursued the most barbarous persecutions, against those who + have not been enabled to contemplate this changeable idea under the same + point of view with himself. + </p> + <p> + There have, however, been men who had sufficient courage to resist this + torrent of opinion—to oppose themselves to this delirium; who have + believed, that the object which was announced as the most important for + mortals, as the sole object worthy of their thoughts, demanded an + attentive examination; who apprehended that if experience could be of any + utility, if judgment could afford any advantage, if reason was of any use + whatever, it must, most unquestionably be, to consider this quality so + opposed to every thing in nature, which was said to regulate all the + beings which she contains. These quickly saw they could not subscribe to + the general opinion of the uninformed, who never examine any thing, who + take every thing upon the credit of others; much less was it consistent + with sound sense to agree with their guides, who, either deceivers or + deceived, forbade others to submit it to the scrutiny of reason; who were + themselves frequently in an utter incapacity to pass it under such an + ordeal. Thus some thinkers, disgusted with the obscure and contradictory + notions which others had through habit mechanically attached to this + incomprehensible property, had the temerity to shake off the yoke which + had been imposed upon them from their infancy: calling reason to their aid + against those terrors with which they alarmed the ignorant, revolting at + the hideous descriptions under which they attempted to defend their + hypothesis, they had the intrepidity to tear the veil of delusion; to rend + asunder the barriers of imposture; they considered with calm resolution, + this formidable prejudice, contemplated with a serene eye this unsupported + opinion, examined with cool deliberation this fluctuating notion, which + had become the object of all the hopes, the source of all the fears, the + spring of all the quarrels which distracted the mind, and disturbed the + harmony of blind, confiding mortals. + </p> + <p> + The result of these inquiries has uniformly been, a conviction that no + rational proof has ever been adduced in support of this hypothesis; that + from the nature of the thing itself, none can be offered; that an + incorporeity is inconceivable to corporeal beings; that these only behold + nature acting after invariable laws, in which every thing is material; + that all the phenomena of which the world is the theatre, spring out of + natural causes; that man as well as all the other beings is the work or + this nature, is only an instrument in her hand, obliged to accomplish the + eternal decrees of an imperious necessity. + </p> + <p> + Whatever efforts the philosopher makes to penetrate the secrets of nature, + he never finds more, as we have many times repeated, than matter; various + in itself, diversely modified in consequence of the motion it undergoes. + Its whole, as well as its parts, displays only necessary causes producing + necessary effects, which flow necessarily one out of the other: of which + the mind, aided by experience, is more or less competent to discover the + concatenation. In virtue of their specific properties, all the beings that + come under our review, gravitate towards a centre—attract analogous + matter—repel that which is unsuitable to combination—mutually + receive and give impulse—acquire qualities—undergo + modifications which maintain them in existence for a season—are born + and dissolved by the operation of an inexorable decree, that obliges every + thing, we behold to pass into a new mode of existence. It is to these + continued vicissitudes that are to be ascribed all the phenomena, whether + trivial or of magnitude; ordinary or extraordinary; known or unknown; + simple or complicated; which are operated in the universe. It is by these + mutations alone that we have any knowledge of nature: she is only + mysterious to those who contemplate her through the veil of prejudice: her + course is always simple to those who look at her without prepossession. + </p> + <p> + To attribute the effects to which we are witnesses, to nature, to matter, + variously combined with the motion that is inherent to it, is to give them + an intelligible and known cause; to attempt to penetrate deeper, is to + plunge ourselves into imaginary regions, where we find only a chaos of + obscurities—where we are lost in an unfathomable abyss of + incertitude. Let us then be content with contemplating nature, who, being + self-existent, must in her essence possess motion; which cannot be + conceived without properties, from which result perpetual action and + re-action; or those continual efforts which give birth to such a numerous + train of circumstances; in which a single molecule cannot be found, that + does not necessarily occupy the place assigned to it, by immutable and + necessary laws—that is for an instant in an absolute state of + repose. What necessity can there exist to seek out of matter for a power + to give it play, since its motion flows as necessarily out of its + existence as its bulk, its form, its gravity, &c. since nature in + inaction would no longer be nature? + </p> + <p> + If it be demanded, How can we figure to ourselves, that matter by its own + peculiar energy can produce all the effects we witness? I shall reply, + that if by matter it is obstinately determined to understand nothing but a + dead, inert mass, destitute of every property, incapable of moving itself, + we shall no longer have a single idea of matter; we shall no longer be + able to account for any thing. As soon, however, as it exists, it must + have properties; as soon as it has properties, without which it could not + exist, it must act by virtue of those properties; since it is only by its + action we can have a knowledge of its existence, be conscious of its + properties. It is evident that if by matter be understood that which it is + not, or if its existence be denied, those phenomena which strike our + visual organs cannot be attributed to it. But if by nature be understood + (that which she really is), an heap of existing matter, possessing various + properties, we shall be obliged to acknowledge that nature must be + competent to move herself; by the diversity of her motion, must have the + capability, independent of foreign aid, to produce the effects we behold; + we shall find that nothing can be made from nothing; that nothing is made + by chance; that the mode of action of every particle of matter, however + minute, is necessarily determined by its own peculiar, or by its + individual properties. + </p> + <p> + We have elsewhere said, that that which cannot be annihilated—that + which in its nature is indestructible—cannot have been inchoate, + cannot have had a beginning to its existence, but exists necessarily from + all eternity; contains within itself a sufficient cause for its own + peculiar existence. It becomes then perfectly useless to seek out of + nature a cause for her action which is in some respects known to us; with + which indefatigable research may, judging of the future by the past, + render us more familiar. As we know some of the general properties of + matter; as we can discover some of its qualities, wherefore should we seek + its motion in an unintelligible cause, of which we are not in a condition + to become acquainted with any one of its properties? Can we conceive that + immateriality could ever draw matter from its own source? Impossible; it + is not within the grasp of human intellect. If creation is an eduction + from nothing, there must have been a time when matter had not existence; + there must consequently be a time when it will cease to be: this latter is + acknowledged by many theologians themselves to be impossible. Do those who + are continually talking of this mysterious act of omnipotence, by which a + mass of matter has been, all at once, substituted to nothing, perfectly + understand what they tell us? Is there a man on earth who conceives that a + being devoid of extent can exist, become the cause of the existence of + beings who have extent—act upon matter—draw it from his own + peculiar essence—set it in motion? In truth, the more we consider + theology, the more we must be convinced that it has invented words + destitute of sense; substituted sounds to intelligible realities. + </p> + <p> + For want of consulting experience, for want or studying nature, for want + of examining the material world, we have plunged ourselves into an + intellectual vacuum, which we have peopled with chimeras, We have not + stooped to consider matter, to study its different periods, to follow it + through its numerous, changes. We have either ridiculously or knavishly + confounded dissolution, decomposition, the separation of the elementary + particles of bodies, with their radical destruction; we have been + unwilling to see that the elements are indestructible; although the forms + are fleeting, and depend upon transitory combination. We have not + distinguished the change of figure, the alteration of position, the + mutation of texture, to which matter is liable, from its annihilation, + which is impossible; we have falsely concluded, that matter Was not a + necessary being—that it commenced to exist—that this existence + was derived from that which possessed nothing in common with itself—that + that which was not substance, could give birth to that which is. Thus an + unintelligible name has been substituted for matter, which furnishes us + with true ideas of nature; of which at each instant we experience the + influence, of which we undergo the action, of which we feel the power, and + of which we should have a much better knowledge, if our abstract opinions + did not continually fasten a bandage over our eyes. + </p> + <p> + Indeed the most simple notions of philosophy shew us, that, although + bodies change and disappear, nothing is however lost in nature; the + various produce of the decomposition of a body serves for elements, + supplies materials, forms the basis, lays the foundation for accretions, + contributes to the maintenance of other bodies. The whole of nature + subsists, and is conserved only by the circulation, the transmigration, + the exchange, the perpetual displacement of insensible atoms—the + continual mutation of the sensible combinations of matter. It is by this + palingenesia, this regeneration, that the great whole, the mighty + macrocosm subsists; who, like the Saturn of the ancients, is perpetually + occupied with devouring her own children. + </p> + <p> + It will not then be inconsistent with observation, repugnant to reason, + contrary to good sense, to acknowledge that matter is self-existent; that + it acts by an energy peculiar to itself; that it will never be + annihilated. Let us then say, that matter is eternal; that nature has + been, is, and ever will be occupied with producing and destroying; with + doing and undoing; with combining and separating; in short, with following + a system of laws resulting from its necessary existence. For every thing + that she doth, she needs only to combine the elements of matter; these, + essentially diverse, necessarily either attract or repel each other; come + into collision, from whence results either their union or dissolution; by + the same laws that one approximates, the other recedes from their + respective spheres of action. It is thus that she brings forth plants, + fossils, animals, men; thus she gives existence to organized, sensible, + thinking beings, as well as to those who are destitute of either feeling + or thought. All these act for the season of their respective duration, + according to immutable laws, determined by their various properties; + arising out of their configuration; depending on their masses; resulting + from their ponderosity, &c. Here is the true origin of every thing + which is presented to our view; this indicates the mode by which nature, + according to her own peculiar powers, is in a state to produce all those + astonishing effects which assail our wondering eyes; all that phenomena to + which mankind is the witness; as well as all the bodies who act diversely + upon the organs with which he is furnished, of which he can only judge + according to the manner in which these organs are affected. He says they + are good, when they are analogous to his own mode of existence—when + they contribute to the maintenance of the harmony of his machine: he says + they are bad, when they disturb this harmony. It is thus he ascribes + views, ideas, designs, to the being he supposes to be the power by which + nature is moved; although all the experience we are able to collect, + unequivocally proves, that she acts after an invariable, eternal code of + laws. + </p> + <p> + Nature is destitute of those views which actuate man; she acts + necessarily, because she exists: her system is immutable, and founded upon + the essence of things. It is the essence of the seed of the male, composed + of primitive elements, which serve for the basis of an organized being, to + unite itself with that of the female; to fructify it; to produce, by this + combination, a new organized being; who, feeble in his origin, not having + yet acquired a sufficient quantity of material particles to give him + consistence, corroborates himself by degrees; strengthens himself by the + daily accretion of analogous matter; is nourished by the modifications + appropriate to his existence: matured by the continuation of circumstances + calculated to give vigour to his frame; thus he lives, thinks, acts, + engenders in his turn other organized beings similar to himself. By a + consequence of his temperament and of physical laws, this generation does + not take place, except when the circumstances necessary to its production + find themselves united. Thus this procreation is not operated by chance; + the animal does not fructify, but with an animal of his own species, + because this is the only one analogous to himself, who unites the + qualities, who combines the circumstances, suitable to produce a being + resembling himself; without this he would not produce any thing, or he + would only give birth to a being who would be denominated a monster, + because it would be dissimilar to himself. It is of the essence of the + grain of plants, to be impregnated by the pollen or seed of the stygma of + the flower; in this state of copulation they in consequence develope + themselves in the bowels of the earth; expand by the aid of water; shoot + forth by the accession of heat; attract analogous particles to corroborate + their system: thus by degrees they form a plant, a shrub, a tree, + susceptible of that life, filled with that motion, capable of that action + which is suitable to vegetable existence. It is of the essence of + particular particles of earth, homogeneous in their nature, when separated + by circumstances, attenuated by water, elaborated by heat, to unite + themselves in the bosom of mountains, with other atoms which are + analogous; to form by their aggregation, according to their various + affinities, those bodies possessing more or less solidity; having more or + less purity, which are called diamonds, chrystals, stones, metals, + minerals. It is of the essence of exhalations raised by the heat of the + atmosphere, to combine, to collect themselves, to dash against each other, + and either by their union or their collision to produce meteors, to + generate thunder. It is of the essence of some inflammable matter to + gather itself together, to ferment in the caverns of the earth, to + increase its active force by augmenting its heat, and then explode, by the + accession of other matter suitable to the operation, with that tremendous + force which we call earthquakes; by which mountains are destroyed; cities + overturned; the inhabitants of the plains thrown into a state of + consternation; these full of alarm, unused to meditate on natural effects, + unconscious of the extent of physical powers, stretch forth their hands in + dismay, heave the most desponding sighs, utter aloud their complaints, and + earnestly implore a cessation of those evils, which nature, acting by + necessary laws, obliges them to experience as necessarily as she does + those benefits by which she fills them with the most extravagant joy. In + short, it is of the essence of certain climates to produce men so + organized, whose temperament is so modified, that they become either + extremely useful or very prejudicial to their species, in the same manner + as it is the property of certain portions of the land, to bring forth + either delicious fruits or dangerous poisons. + </p> + <p> + In all this nature acts necessarily; she pursues an undeviating course, + which we are bound to consider the perfection of wisdom; because she + exists necessarily, has her modes of action determined by certain, + invariable laws, which themselves flow out of the constituent properties + of the various beings she contains, and those circumstances, which the + eternal motion she is in must necessarily bring about. It is ourselves who + have a necessary aim, which is our own conservation; it is by this that we + regulate all the ideas we form to ourselves of the causes acting in + nature; it is according to this standard we judge of every thing we see or + feel. Animated ourselves, existing after a certain manner, possessing a + soul endowed with rare and peculiar qualities, we, like the savage, + ascribe a soul and animated life to every thing that acts upon us. + Thinking and intelligent ourselves, we give these, faculties to those + beings whom we suppose to be more powerful than mortals; but as we see the + generality of matter incapable of modifying itself, we suppose it must + receive its impulse from some concealed agent, some external cause, which + our imagination pictures as similar to ourselves. Necessarily attracted by + that which is advantageous to us, repelling by an equal necessity that + which is prejudicial to our manner of existence; we cease to reflect that + our modes of feeling are due to our peculiar organization, modified by + physical causes: in this state, either of inattention or ignorance, we + mistake the natural results of our own peculiar structure, for instruments + employed by a being whom we clothe with our own passions—whom we + suppose actuated by our own views—who, possessing our ideas, + embraces a mode of thinking and acting similar to ourselves. + </p> + <p> + If after this it be asked, What is the end of nature? We shall reply that + on this head we are ignorant; that it is more than probable no man will + ever fathom the secret; but we shall also say, it is evidently to exist, + to act, to conserve her whole. If then it be demanded, Wherefore she + exists? We shall again reply, of this we know nothing at present, possibly + never shall; but we shall also say, she exists necessarily, that her + operations, her motion, her phenomena, are the necessary consequences of + her necessary existence. There necessarily exists something; this is + nature or the universe, this nature necessarily acts as she does. If it be + wished to substitute any other word for nature, the question will still + remain as it did, as to the cause of her existence; the end she has in + view. It is not by changing of terms that a geometrician can solve + problems; one word will throw no more light on a subject than another, + unless that word carries a certain degree of conviction in the ideas which + it generates. As long as we speak of matter, if we cannot develope all its + properties, we shall at least have fixed, determinate ideas; something + tangible, of which we have a slight knowledge, that we can submit to the + examination of our senses: but from the moment we begin to talk of + immateriality, of incorporeity, from thence our ideas become confused; we + are lost in a labyrinth of conjecture—we have no one means of + seizing the subject on any side—we are, after the most elaborate + arguments, after the most subtle reasoning, obliged to acknowledge we + cannot form the most slender opinion respecting it, that has any thing + substantive for its support. In short, that it is precisely that thing "of + which every thing may be denied, but of which nothing can with truth be + affirmed." Let us clothe this incomprehensible being with whatever + qualities we may, it will be always in ourselves we seek the model; they + will be our own faculties that we delineate, our own passions that we + describe. In like manner man, as long as he is ignorant, will always + conjecture that it is for himself alone the universe was formed; not + withstanding, he has nothing more to do, than to open his eyes in order to + be undeceived. He will then see, that he undergoes a common destiny, + equally partakes with all other beings of the benefits, shares with them + without exception the evils of life; like them he is submitted to an + imperious necessity, inexorable in its decrees; which is itself nothing + more than the sum total of those laws which nature herself is obliged to + follow. + </p> + <p> + Thus every thing proves that nature, or matter, exists necessarily; that + it cannot in any moment swerve from those laws imposed upon it by its + existence. If it cannot be annihilated, it cannot have been inchoate. The + theologian himself agrees that it requires a miracle to annihilate an + atom. But is it possible to derogate from the necessary laws of existence? + Can that which exists necessarily, act but according to the laws peculiar + to itself? Miracle is another word invented to shield our own sloth, to + cover our own ignorance; it is that by which we wish to designate those + rare occurrences, those solitary effects of natural causes, whose + infrequency do not afford us means of diving into their springs. It is + only saying by another expression, that an unknown cause hath by modes + which we cannot trace, produced an uncommon effect which we did not + expect, which therefore appears strange to us. This granted, the + intervention of words, far from removing the ignorance in which we found + ourselves with respect to the power and capabilities of nature, only + serves to augment it, to give it more durability. The creation of matter + becomes to our mind as incomprehensible, and appears as impossible as its + annihilation. + </p> + <p> + Let us then conclude that all those words which do not present to the mind + any determinate idea, ought to be banished the language of those who are + desirous of speaking so as to be understood; that abstract terms, invented + by ignorance, are only calculated to satisfy men destitute of experience; + who are too slothful to study nature, too timid to search into her ways; + that they are suitable only to content those enthusiasts, whose curious + imagination pleases itself with making fruitless endeavours to spring + beyond the visible world; who occupy themselves with chimeras of their own + creation: in short, that these words are useful only to those whose sole + profession it is to feed the ears of the uninformed with pompous sounds, + that are not comprehended by themselves—upon the sense of which they + are in a state of perpetual hostility with each other—upon the true + meaning of which they have never yet been able to come to a common + agreement; which each sees after his own peculiar manner of contemplating + objects, in which there never was, nor probably never will be, the least + harmony of feeling. + </p> + <p> + Man is a material being; he cannot consequently have any ideas, but of + that which like himself is material; that is to say, of that which is in a + capacity to act upon his organs, which has some qualities analogous with + his own. In despite of himself, he always assigns material properties to + his gods; the impossibility he finds in compassing them, has made him + suppose them to be spiritual; distinguished from the material world. + Indeed he, must be content, either not to understand himself, or he must + have material ideas of the Divinity; the human mind may torture itself as + long as it pleases, it will never, after all its efforts, be enabled to + comprehend, that material effects can emanate from immaterial causes; or + that such causes can have any relation with material beings. Here is the + reason why man, as we have seen, believes himself obliged to give to his + gods, these morals which he so much so highly esteems, in those beings of + his race, who are fortunate enough to possess them: he forgets that a + being who is spiritual, adopting the theological hypothesis, cannot from + thence either have his organization, or his ideas; that it cannot think in + his mode, nor act after his manner; that consequently it cannot possess + what he calls intelligence, wisdom, goodness, anger, justice, &c. as + he himself understands those terms. Thus, in truth, the moral qualities + with which he has clothed the Divinity, supposes him material, and the + most abstract theological notions, are, after all, founded upon a direct, + undeniable <i>Anthropomorphism</i>. + </p> + <p> + In despite of all their subtilties, the theologians cannot do otherwise; + like all the beings of the human species, they have a knowledge of matter + alone: they have no real idea of a pure spirit. When they speak of the + intelligence, of the wisdom, of the designs of their gods, they are always + those of men which they describe, that they obstinately persist in giving + to beings, of which, according to their own shewing, to the evidence they + themselves adduce, their essence does not render them susceptible; who if + they had those qualities with which they clothe them, would from that very + moment cease to be incorporeal; would be in the truest sense of the word, + substantive matter. How shall we reconcile the assertion, that beings who + have not occasion for any thing—who are sufficient to them selves—whose + projects must be executed as soon as they are formed; can have volition, + passions, desires? How shall we attribute anger to beings without either + blood or bile? How can we conceive an omnipotent being (whose wisdom we + admire in the striking order he has himself established in the universe,) + can permit that this beautiful arrangement should be continually + disturbed, either by the elements in discord, or by the crimes of human + beings? In short, this being cannot have any one of the human qualities, + which always depend upon the peculiar organization of man—upon his + wants—upon his institutions, which are themselves always relative to + the society in which he lives. The theologian vainly strives to + aggrandize, to exaggerate in idea, to carry to perfection by dint of + abstraction, the moral qualities of man; they are unsuitable to the + Divinity; in vain it is asserted they are in him of a different nature + from what they are in his creatures; that they are perfect; infinite; + supreme; eminent; in holding this language, they no longer understand + themselves; they can have no one idea of the qualities they are + describing, seeing that man can never have a conception of them, but + inasmuch as they bear an analogy to the same qualities in himself. + </p> + <p> + It is thus that by force of metaphysical subtilty, mortals have no longer + any fixed, any determinate idea of the beings to which they have given + birth. But little contented with understanding physical causes, with + contemplating active nature; weary of examining matter, which experience + proves is competent to the production of every thing, man has been + desirous to despoil it of the energy which it is its essence to possess, + in order to invest it in a pure spirit; in an immaterial substance; which + he is under the necessity of re-making a material being, whenever he has + an inclination either to form an idea of it to himself, or make it + understood by others. In assembling the parts of man, which he does no + more than enlarge, which he swells out to infinity, he believes he forms + an immaterial being, who, for that reason, acquires the capability of + performing all those phenomena, with the true causes of which he is + ignorant; nevertheless those operations of which he does comprehend the + spring, he as sedulously denies to be due to the powers of this being; + time, therefore, according to these ideas, as he advances the progress of + science, as he further developes the secrets of nature, is continually + diminishing the number of actions ascribed to this being—is + constantly circumscribing his sphere of action. It is upon the model of + the human soul that he forms the soul of nature, or that secret agent from + which she receives impulse. After having made himself double, he makes + nature in like manner twofold, and then he supposes she is vivified by an + intelligence, which he borrows from himself, Placed in an impossibility of + becoming acquainted with this agent, as well as with that which he has + gratuitously distinguished from his own body; he has invented the word + spiritual to cover up his ignorance; which is only in other words avowing + it is a substance entirely unknown to him. From that moment, however, he + has no ideas whatever of what he himself has done; because he first + clothes it with all the qualities he esteems in his fellows, and then + destroys them by an assurance, that they in no wise resemble the qualities + he has been so anxious to bestow. To remedy this inconvenience, he + concludes this spiritual substance much more noble than matter; that its + prodigious subtilty, which he calls simplicity, but which is only the + effect of metaphysical abstraction, secures it from decomposition, from + dissolution, from all those revolutions, to which material bodies, as + produced by nature, are evidently exposed. + </p> + <p> + It is thus, that man always prefers the marvellous to the simple; the + unintelligible to the intelligible; that which he cannot comprehend, to + that which is within the range of his understanding; he despises those + objects which are familiar to him; he estimates those alone with which he + is incapable of having any intercourse: that of which he has only confused + vague ideas, he concludes must contain something important for him to know—must + have something supernatural in its construction. In short, he needs + mystery to move his imagination—to exercise his mind—to feed + his curiosity; which never labours harder, than when it is occupied with + enigmas impossible to be guessed at; which from that very circumstance, he + judges to be extremely worthy of his research. This, without doubt, is the + reason he looks upon matter, which he has continually under his eyes, + which he sees perpetually in action, eternally changing its form, as a + contemptible thing—as a contingent being, that does not exist + necessarily; consequently, that cannot exist independently: this is the + reason why he has imagined a spirit, which he will never be able to + conceive; which on that account he declares to be superior to matter; + which he roundly asserts to be anterior to nature, and the only + self-existent being. The human wind found food in these mystical ideas, + they unceasingly occupied it; the imagination had play, it embellished + them after its own manner: ignorance fed itself with the fables to which + these mysteries gave rise; habit identified them with the existence of man + himself: when each could ask the other concerning these ideas, without any + one being in a capacity to return a direct answer, he felt himself + gratified, he immediately concluded that the general impossibility of + reply stamped them with the wondrous faculty of immediately interesting + his welfare; of involving his most prominent interests, more than all the + things put together, with which he had any possible means of becoming + intimately acquainted. Thus they became necessary to his happiness; he + believed he fell into a vacuum without them; he became the decided enemy + to all those who endeavoured to lead him back to nature, which he had + learned to despise; to consider only as an impotent mass, an heap of inert + matter, not possessing any energy but what it received from causes + exterior to itself; as a contemptible assemblage of fragile combinations, + whose forms were continually subject to perish. + </p> + <p> + In distinguishing nature from her mover, man has fallen into the same + absurdity as when he separated his soul from his body; life from the + living being; the faculty of thought from the thinking being: deceived on + his own peculiar nature, having taken up an erroneous opinion upon the + energy of his own organs, he has in like manner been deceived upon the + organization of the universe; he has distinguished nature from herself; + the life of nature from living nature; the action of nature from active + nature. It was this soul of the world—this energy of nature—this + principle of activity, which man first personified, then separated by + abstraction; sometimes decorated with imaginary attributes; sometimes with + qualities borrowed from his own peculiar essence. Such were the aerial + materials of which man availed himself to construct the incomprehensible, + immaterial substances, which have filled the world with disputes—which + have divided man from his fellow—which to this day he has never been + able to define, even to his own satisfaction. His own soul was the model. + Deceived upon the nature of this, he never had any just ideas of the + Divinity, who was, in his mind, nothing more than a copy exaggerated or + disfigured to that degree, as to make him mistake the prototype upon which + it had been originally formed. + </p> + <p> + If, because man has distinguished himself from his own existence, it has + been impossible for him ever to form to himself any true idea of his own + nature; it is also because he has distinguished nature from herself, that + both herself and her ways have been mistaken. Man has ceased to study + nature, that he might, recur by thought to a substance which possesses + nothing in common with her; this substance he has made the mover of + nature, without which she would not be capable of any thing; to whom every + thing that takes place in her system, must be attributed; the conduct of + this being has appeared mysterious, has been held up as marvellous, + because he seemed to be a continual contradiction: when if man had but + recurred to the immutability of the laws of nature, to the invariable + system she pursues, all would have appeared intelligible; every thing + would have been reconciled; the apparent contrariety would have vanished. + By thus taking a wrong view of things, wisdom and intelligence appeared to + be opposed by confusion and disorder; goodness to be rendered nugatory by + evil; while all is only just what it must inevitably be, under the given + circumstances. In consequence of these erroneous opinions, in the place of + applying himself to the study of nature, to discover the method of + obtaining her favors, or to seek the means of throwing aside his + misfortunes; in the room of consulting his experience; in lieu of + labouring usefully to his own happiness; he has been only occupied with + expecting these things by channels through which they do not flow; he has + been disputing upon objects be never can understand, while he has totally + neglected that which was within the compass of his own powers; which he + might have rendered propitious to his views, by a more industrious + application of his own talent; by a patient investigation, for the purpose + of drawing at the fountain of truth, the limpid balsam that alone can heal + the sorrows or his heart. + </p> + <p> + Nothing could be well more prejudicial to his race, than this extravagant + theory; which, as we shall prove, has become the source of innumerable + evils. Man has been for thousands of years trembling before idols of his + own creation—bowing down before them with the most servile homage—occupied + with disarming their wrath—sedulously employed in propitiating their + kindness, without ever advancing a single step on the road he so much + desires to travel. He will perhaps continue the same course for centuries + to come, unless by some unlooked for exertion on his part, he shall happen + to discard the prejudices which blind him; to lay aside his enthusiasm for + the marvellous; to quit his fondness for the enigmatical; rally round the + standard of his reason: unless, taking experience for his guide, he march + undauntedly forward under the banner of truth, and put to the rout that + host of unintelligible jargon, under the cumbrous load of which he has + lost sight of his own happiness; which has but too frequently prevented + him from seeking the only means adequate either to satisfy his wants, or + to ameliorate the evils which he is necessarily obliged to experience. + </p> + <p> + Let us then re-conduct bewildered mortals to the altar of nature; let us + endeavour to destroy that delusion which the ignorance of man, aided by a + disordered imagination, has induced him to elevate to her throne; let us + strive to dissipate that heavy mist which obscures to him the paths of + truth; let us seek to banish from his mind those visionary ideas which + prevent him from giving activity to his experience; let us teach him if + possible not to seek out of nature herself, the causes of the phenomena he + admires—to rest satisfied that she contains remedies for all his + evils—that she has manifold benefits in store for those, who, + rallying their industry, are willingly patiently to investigate her laws—that + she rarely withholds her secrets from the researches of those who + diligently labour to unravel them. Let us assure him that reason alone can + render him happy; that reason is nothing more than the science of nature, + applied to the conduct of man in society; that this reason teaches that + every thing is necessary; that his pleasures as well as his sorrows are + the effects of nature, who in all her works follows only laws which + nothing can make her revoke; that his interest demands he should learn to + support with equanimity of mind, all those evils which natural means do + not enable him to put aside. In short, let us unceasingly repeat to him, + it is in rendering his fellow creature happy, that he will himself arrive + at a felicity he will in vain expect from others, when his own conduct + refuses it to him. + </p> + <p> + Nature is self-existent; she will always exist; she produces every thing; + contains within herself the cause of every thing; her motion is a + necessary consequence of her existence; without motion we could form no + conception of nature; under this collective name we designate the + assemblage of matter acting by virtue of its peculiar energies. Every + thing proves to us, that it is not out of nature man ought to seek the + Divinity. If we have only an incomplete knowledge of nature and her ways—if + we have only superficial, imperfect ideas of matter, how shall we be able + to flatter ourselves with understanding or having any certain notions of + immateriality, of beings so much more fugitive, so much more difficult to + compass, even by thought, than the material elements; so much more shy of + access than either the constituent principles of bodies, their primitive + properties, their various modes of acting, or their different manner of + existing? If we cannot recur to first causes, let its content ourselves + with second causes, with those effects which we can submit to experience, + let us collect the facts with which we have an acquaintance; they will + enable us to judge of what we do not know: let us at least confine + ourselves to the feeble glimmerings of truth with which our senses furnish + us, since we do not possess means whereby to acquire broader masses of + light. + </p> + <p> + Do not let us mistake for real sciences, those which have no other basis + than our imagination; we shall find that such can at most be but + visionary: let us cling close to nature which we see, which we feel, of + which we experience the action; of which at least we understand the + general laws. If we are ignorant of her detail, if we cannot fathom the + secret principles she employs in her most complicated productions, we are + at least certain she acts in a permanent, uniform, analogous, necessary + manner. Let us then observe this nature; let us watch her movements; but + never let us endeavour to quit the routine she prescribes for the beings + of our species: if we do, we shall not only be obliged to return, but we + shall also infallibly be punished with numberless errors, which will + darken our mind, estrange us from reason; the necessary consequence will + be countless sorrows, which we may otherwise avoid. Let us consider we are + sensible parts of a whole, in which the forms are only produced to be + destroyed; in which combinations are ushered into life, that they may + again quit it, after having subsisted for a longer or a shorter season. + Let us look upon nature as an immense elaboratory which contains every + thing necessary for her action; who lacks nothing requisite for the + production of all the phenomena she displays to our sight. Let us + acknowledge her power to be inherent in her essence; amply commensurate to + her eternal march; fully adequate to the happiness of all the beings she + contains. Let us consider her as a whole, who can only maintain herself by + what we call the discord of the elements; that she exists by the continual + dissolution and re-union of her parts; that from this springs the + universal harmony; that from this the general stability has its birth. Let + us then re-establish omnipotent nature, so long mistaken by man, in her + legitimate rights. Let us place her on that adamantine throne, which it is + for the felicity of the human race she should occupy. Let us surround her + with those ministers who can never deceive, who can never forfeit our + confidence—<i>Justice and Practical Knowledge</i>. Let us listen to + her eternal voice; she neither speaks ambiguously, nor in an + unintelligible language; she may be easily comprehended by the people of + all nations; because <i>Reason</i> is her faithful interpreter. She offers + nothing to our contemplation but immutable truths. Let us then for ever + impose silence on that enthusiasm which leads us astray; let us put to the + blush that imposture which would riot on our credulity; let us discard + that gloomy superstition, which has drawn us aside from the only worship + suitable to intelligent beings. Above all, never let us forget that the + temple of happiness can only be reached through the groves of virtue, + which surround it on every side; that the paths which lead to these + beautiful walks can only be entered by the road of experience, the portals + of which are alone opened to those who apply to them the key of truth: + this key is of very simple structure, has no complicated intricacy of + wards, and is easily formed on the anvil of social intercourse, merely by + <i>not doing unto others that which you would not wish they should do unto + you.</i> + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0009" id="link2H_4_0009"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. VII. + </h2> + <h3> + <i>Of Theism.—Of the System of Optimism.—Of final Causes</i>. + </h3> + <p> + Very few men have either the courage or the industry to examine opinions, + which every one is in agreement to acknowledge; there is scarcely any one + who ventures to doubt their truth, even when no solid arguments have been + adduced in their support. The natural supineness of man readily receives + them without examination upon the authority of others—communicates + them to his successors in the season of their infancy; thus is transmitted + from race to race, notions which once having obtained the sanction of + time, are contemplated as clothed with a sacred character, although + perhaps to an unprejudiced mind, who should be bent on searching into + their foundation, no proofs will appear, that they ever were verified. It + is thus with immateriality: it has passed current from father to son for + many ages, without these having done any thing more than habitually + consign to their brain those obscure ideas which were at first attached to + it, which it is evident, from the admission even of its advocates, can + never be removed, to admit others of a more enlightened nature. Indeed how + can it possibly be, that light can be thrown upon an incomprehensible + subject: each therefore modifies it after his own manner; each gives it + that colouring that most harmonizes with his own peculiar existence; each + contemplates it under that perspective which is the issue of his own + particular vision: this from the nature of things cannot be the same in + every individual: there must then of necessity be a great contrariety in + the opinions resulting. It is thus also that each man forms to himself a + God in particular, after his own peculiar temperament—according to + his own natural dispositions: the individual circumstances under which he + is found, the warmth of his imagination, the prejudices he has received, + the mode in which he is at different times affected, have all their + influence in the picture he forms. The contented, healthy man, does not + see him with the same eyes as the man who is chagrined and sick; the man + with a heated blood, who has an ardent imagination, or is subject to bile, + does not pourtray him under the same traits as he who enjoys a more + peaceable soul, who has a cooler fancy, who is of a more phlegmatic habit. + This is not all; even the same individual does not view him in the same + manner at different periods of his life: he undergoes all the variations + of his machine—all the revolutions of his temperament—all + those continual vicissitudes which his existence experiences. The idea of + the Divinity is said to be innate; on the contrary, it is perpetually + fluctuating in the mind of each individual; varies every moment in all the + beings of the human species; so much so, that there are not two who admit + precisely the same Deity; there is not a single one, who, under different + circumstances, does not see him variously. + </p> + <p> + Do not then let us be surprised at the variety of systems adopted by + mankind on this subject; it ought not to astonish us that there is so + little harmony existing among men upon a point of such consequence; it + ought not to appear strange that so much contradiction should prevail in + the various doctrines held forth; that they should have such little + consistency, such slender connection with each other; that the professors + should dispute continually upon the rectitude of the opinions adopted by + each: they must necessarily wrangle upon that which each contemplates so + variously—upon which there is hardly a single mortal who is + constantly in accord with himself. + </p> + <p> + All men are pretty well agreed upon those objects which they are enabled + to submit to the test of experience; we do not hear any disputes upon the + principles of geometry; those truths that are evident, that are easily + demonstrable, never vary in our mind; we never doubt that the part is less + than the whole; that two and two make four; that benevolence is an amiable + quality; that equity is necessary to man in society. But we find nothing + but perpetual controversy upon all those systems which have the Divinity + for their object; they are full of incertitude; subject to continual + variations: we do not see any harmony either in the principles of + theology, or in the principles of its graduates. Even the proofs offered + of his existence have been the subject of cavil; they have either been + thought too feeble, have been brought forward against rule, or else have + not been taken up with sufficient zeal to please the various reasoners who + advocate the cause; the corollaries drawn from the premises laid down, are + not the same in any two nations, scarcely in two individuals; the thinkers + of all ages, in all countries, are perpetually in rivalry with each other; + unceasingly quarrel upon all the points of religion; can never agree + either upon their theological hypotheses, or upon the fundamental truths + which should serve for their basis; even the attributes, the very + qualities ascribed, are as warmly contested by some, as they are zealously + defended by others. + </p> + <p> + These never-ending disputes, these perpetual variations, ought, at least, + to convince the unprejudiced, that the ideas of the Divinity have neither + the generally-admitted evidence, nor the certitude which are attributed to + them; on the contrary, these contrarieties in the opinions of the + theologians, if submitted to the logic of the schools, might be fatal to + the whole of them: according to that mode of reasoning, which at least has + the sanction of our universities, all the probabilities in the world + cannot acquire the force of a demonstration; a truth is not made evident + but when constant experience, reiterated reflection, exhibits it always + under the same point of view; the evidence of a proposition cannot be + admitted unless it carries with it a substantive demonstration; from the + constant relation which is made by well constituted senses, results that + evidence, that certitude, which alone can produce full conviction: if the + major proposition of a syllogism should be overturned by the minor, the + whole falls to the ground. Cicero, who is no mean authority on such a + subject, says expressly, "No reasoning can render that false, which + experience has demonstrated as evident." Wolff, in his Ontology, says; + "That which is repugnant in itself, cannot possibly be understood; that + those things which are in themselves contradictions, must always be + deficient of evidence." St. Thomas says, "Being, is all that which is not + repugnant to existence." + </p> + <p> + However it may be with these qualities, which the theologians assign to + their immaterial beings, whether they may be irreconcileable, or whether + they are totally incomprehensible, what can result to the human species in + supposing them to have intelligence and views? Can an universal + intelligence, whose care must be equally extended to every thing that + exists, have more direct, more intimate relations with man, who only forms + an insensible portion of the great whole? Can we seriously believe that it + is to make joyful the insects, to gratify the ants of his garden, that the + Monarch of the universe has constructed and embellished his habitation? + Would our feeble eyes, therefore, become stronger—would our narrow + views of things be enlarged—should we be better capacitated to + understand his projects—could we with more certitude divine his + plans, enter into his designs—would our exility of judgment be + competent to measure his wisdom, to follow the eternal order he has + established? Will those effects, which flow from his omnipotence, emanate + from his providence—whether we estimate them as good, or whether we + tax them as evil—whether we consider them beneficial, or view them + as prejudicial—be less the necessary results of his wisdom, of his + justice, of his eternal decrees? In this case can we reasonably suppose + that a Being, so wise, so just, so intelligent, will derange his system, + change his plan, for such weak beings as ourselves? Can we rationally + believe we have the capacity to address worthy prayers, to make suitable + requests, to point out proper modes of conduct to such a Being? Can we at + all flatter ourselves that to please us, to gratify our discordant wishes, + he will alter his immutable laws? Can we imagine that at our entreaty he + will take from the beings who surround us their essences, their + properties, their various modes of action? Have we any right to expect he + will abrogate in our behalf the eternal laws of nature, that he will + disturb her eternal march, arrest her ever-lasting course, which his + wisdom has planned; which his goodness has conferred; which are, in fact, + the admiration of mankind? Can we hope that in our favour fire will cease + to burn, when we approximate it too closely; that fever shall not consume + our habit, when contagion has penetrated our system; that gout shall not + torment us, when an intemperate mode of life shall have amassed the + humours that necessarily result from such conduct; that an edifice + tumbling in ruins shall not crush us by its fall, when we are within the + vortex of its action? Will our vain cries, our most fervent supplications, + prevent a country from being unhappy, when it shall be devastated by an + ambitious conqueror; when it shall be submitted to the capricious will of + unfeeling tyrants, who bend it beneath the iron rod of their oppression? + </p> + <p> + If this infinite intelligence gives a free course to those events which + his wisdom has prepared; if nothing happens in this world but after his + impenetrable designs; we ought silently to submit; we have in fact nothing + to ask; we should be madmen to oppose our own weak intellect to such + capacious wisdom; we should offer an insult to his prudence if we were + desirous to regulate them. Man must not flatter himself that he is wiser + than his God; that he is in a capacity to make him change his will; with + having power to determine him to take other means than those which he has + chosen to accomplish his decrees. An intelligent Divinity can only have + taken those measures which embrace complete justice; can only have availed + himself of those means which are best calculated to arrive at his end; if + he was capable of changing them, he could neither be called wise, + immutable, nor provident. If it was to be granted, that the Divinity did + for a single instant suspend those laws which he himself has given, if he + was to change any thing in his plan, it would be supposing he had not + foreseen the motives of this suspension; that he had not calculated the + causes of this change; if he did not make these motives enter into his + plan, it would be saying he had not foreseen the causes that render them + necessary: if he has foreseen them without making them part of his system, + it would be arraigning the perfection of the whole. Thus in whatever + manner these things are contemplated, under whatever point of view they + are examined, it is evident that the prayers which man addresses to the + Divinity, which are sanctioned by the different modes of worship, always + suppose he is supplicating a being whose wisdom and providence are + defective; in fact, that his own is more appropriate to his situation. To + suppose he is capable of change in his conduct, is to bring his + omniscience into question; to vitally attack his omnipotence; to arraign + his goodness; at once to say, that he either is not willing or not + competent to judge what would be most expedient for man; for whose sole + advantage and pleasure they will, notwithstanding, insist he created the + universe: such are the inconsistent doctrines of theology; such the + imbecile efforts of metaphysics. + </p> + <p> + It is, however, upon these notions, extravagant as they may appear, ill + directed as they assuredly are, inconclusive as they must be acknowledged + by unprejudiced minds, that are founded all the superstitions and many of + the religions of the earth. It is by no means an uncommon sight, to see + man upon his knees before an all-wise God, whose conduct he is + endeavouring to regulate; whose decrees he wishes to avert; whose plan he + is desirous to reform. These inconsistent objects he is occupied with + gaining, by means equally repugnant to sound sense; equally injurious to + the dignity of the Divinity: adopting his own sensations as the criterion + of the feelings of the Deity; in some places he tries to win him to his + interests by presents; sometimes we behold even the princes of the earth + attempting to direct his views, by offering him splendid garments, upon + which their own fatuity sets an inordinate value, merely because they have + laboured at them themselves; some strive to disarm his justice by the most + splendid pageantry; others by practices the most revolting to humanity; + some think his immutability will yield to idle ceremonies; others to the + most discordant prayers; it not unfrequently happens that to induce him to + change in their favour his eternal decrees, those who have opposite + interests to promote, each returns him thanks for that which the others + consider as the greatest curse that can befal them. In short, man is + almost every where prostrate before an omnipotent God, who, if we were to + judge by the discrepancy of their requests, never has rendered his + creatures such as they ought to be; who to accomplish his divine views has + never taken the proper measures, who to fulfil his wisdom has continual + need of the admonitions of man, conveyed either in the form of thanks or + prayers. + </p> + <p> + We see, then, that superstition is founded upon manifest contradictions, + which man must always fall into when he mistakes the natural causes of + things—when he shall attribute the good or evil which he experiences + to an intelligent cause, distinguished from nature, of which he will never + be competent to form to himself any certain ideas. Indeed, man will always + be reduced, as we have so frequently repeated, to the necessity of + clothing his gods with his own imbecile qualities: as he is himself a + changeable being, whose intelligence is limited; who, placed in divers + circumstances, appears to be frequently in contradiction with himself; + although he thinks he honours his gods in giving them his own peculiar + qualities, he in fact does nothing more than lend them his own + inconstancy, cover them with his own weakness, invest them with his own + vices. It is thus that in reasoning, he is unable to account for the + necessity of things—that he imagines there is a confusion which his + prayers will have a tendency to remove—that he thinks the evils of + life more than commensurate with the good: he does not perceive that an + undeviating system, by operating upon beings diversely organized, whose + circumstances are different, whose modes of action are at variance, must + of necessity sometimes appear to be inimical to the interests of the + individual, while it embraces the general good of the whole. The + theologian may subtilize, exaggerate, render as unintelligible as he + pleases, the attributes with which he clothes his divinities, he will + never be able to remove the contradictions which arise from the discordant + qualities which he thus heaps together; neither will he be able to give + man any other mode of judging than what arises from the exercise of his + senses, such as they are actually found. He will never be able to furnish + the idea of an immutable being, while he shall represent this being as + capable of being irritated and appeased by the prayers of mortals. He will + never delineate the features of omnipotence under the portrait of a being + who cannot restrain the actions of his inferiors. He will never hold up a + standard of justice, while he shall mingle it with mercy, however amiable + the quality; or while he shall represent it as punishing those actions, + which the perpetrators were under the necessity of committing. Neither + will he be able, under any circumstances, to make a finite mind comprehend + infinity; much less when he shall represent this infinity as bounded by + finity itself. + </p> + <p> + From this it will be obvious, that immaterial substances, such as are + depicted by the theologians, can only be looked upon as the offspring of a + metaphysical brain, unsupported by any of those proofs which are usually + required to establish the propositions laid down among men; all the + qualities which they ascribe to them, are only those which are suitable to + material substances; all the abstract properties with which they invest + them, are incomprehensible by material beings; the whole taken together, + is one confused mass of contradictions: they have held forth to man, that + it highly imported to his interests to know, to understand these + substances; he has consequently set his intellect in action to discover + some means of compassing an end, said to be so consequential to his + welfare; he has, however, been unable to make any progress, because no + clue could be offered to him of the road he must pursue; all was mere + assertion unsupported by evidence; the whole was enveloped in complete + darkness, into which the least scintillation of light could never + penetrate. Notwithstanding, as soon as man believes himself greatly + interested in knowing a thing, he labors to form to himself an idea of + that, the knowledge of which he thinks so important; if insuperable + obstacles impede his inquiries—if difficulties of a magnitude to + alarm his industry intervene—if with immense labour he makes but + little progress, then the slender success that attends his research, aided + by a slothful disposition, while it wearies his diligence disposes him to + credulity. It was thus, that a crafty ambitious Arab, subtle and knavish + in his manners, insinuating in his address, profiting by this credulous + inclination, made his countrymen adopt his own fanciful reveries as + permanent truths, of which it was not permitted them for an instant to + doubt; following up these opinions with enthusiasm, he stimulated them on + to become conquerors; obliging the conquered to lend themselves to his + system, he gave currency to a creed, invented solely for the purpose of + enslaving mankind, which now spreads over immense regions inhabited by a + numerous population, although like other systems it does not escape + sectarianism, having above seventy branches. Thus ignorance, despair, + sloth, the want of reflecting habits, place the human race in a state of + dependance upon those who build up systems, while upon the objects which + are the foundations, they have no one settled idea: once adopted, however, + whenever these systems are brought into question, man either reasons in a + very strange manner, or else is the dupe of very deceitful arguments: when + they are agitated, and he finds it impossible to understand what is said + concerning them when his mind cannot embrace the ambiguity of these + doctrines, he imagines those who speak to him are better acquainted with + the objects of their discourse than himself; these seizing the favourable + opportunity, do not let it slip, they reiterate to him with Stentorian + lungs, "That the most certain way is to agree with what they tell him; to + allow himself to be guided by them;" in short, they persuade him to shut + his eyes, that he may with greater perspicuity distinguish the road he is + to travel: once arrived at this influence, they indelibly fix their + lessons; irrevocably chain him to the oar; by holding up to his view the + punishments intended for him by these imaginary beings, in case he refuses + to accredit, in the most liberal manner, their marvellous inventions; this + argument, although it only supposes the thing in question, serves to close + his mouth—to put an end to his research; alarmed, confused, + bewildered, he seems convinced by this victorious reasoning—attaches + to it a sacredness that fills him with awe—blindly conceives that + they have much clearer ideas of the subject than himself—fears to + perceive the palpable contradictions of the doctrines announced to him, + until, perhaps, some being, more subtle than those who have enslaved him, + by labouring the point incessantly, attacking him on the weak side of his + interest, arrives at throwing the absurdity of his system into light, and + finally succeeds by inducing him to adopt that of another set of + speculators. The uninformed man generally believes his priests have more + senses than himself; he takes them for superior beings; for divine men. He + only sees that which these priests inform him he must contemplate; to + every thing else his eyes are completely hoodwinked; thus the authority of + the priests frequently decides, without appeal, that which is useful + perhaps only to the priesthood. + </p> + <p> + When we shall be disposed to recur to the origin of things, we shall ever + find that it has been man's imagination, guided by his ignorance, under + the influence of fear, which gave birth to his gods; that enthusiasm or + imposture have generally either embellished or disfigured them; that + credulity readily adopted the fabulous accounts which interested duplicity + promulgated respecting them; that these dispositions, sanctioned by time, + became habitual. Tyrants finding their advantage in sustaining them, have + usually established their power upon the blindness of mankind, and the + superstitious fears with which it is always accompanied. Thus, under + whatever point of view it is considered, it will always be found that <i>error + cannot be useful to the human species.</i> + </p> + <p> + Nevertheless, the happy enthusiast, when his soul is sensible of its + enjoyments, when his softened imagination has occasion to paint to itself + a seducing object, to which he can render thanks for the kindness he + experiences, will ask, "Wherefore deprive me of a being that I see under + the character of a sovereign, filled with wisdom, abounding in goodness? + What comfort do I not find in figuring to myself a powerful, intelligent, + indulgent monarch, of whom I am the favorite; who continually occupies + himself with my welfare—unceasingly watches over my safety—who + perpetually administers to my wants—who always consents that under + him I shall command the whole of nature? I believe I behold him constantly + showering his benefits on man; I see his Providence labouring for his + advantage without relaxation; he covers the earth with verdure to delight + him; he loads the trees with delicious fruits to gratify his palate; he + fills the forests with animals suitable to his nourishment; he suspends + over his head planets with innumerable stars, to enlighten him by day, to + guide his erring steps by night; he extends around him the azure firmament + to gladden his sight; he decorates the meadows with flowers to please his + fancy; he causes crystal fountains to flow with limpid streams to slake + his thirst; he makes rivulets meander through his lands to fructify the + earth; he washes his residence with noble rivers, that yield him fish in + abundance. Ah! suffer me to thank thee, Author of so many benefits: do not + deprive me of my charming sensations. I shall not find my illusions so + sweet, so consolatory in a severe destiny—in a rigid necessity—in + a blind inanimate matter—in a nature destitute of intelligence, + devoid of feeling." + </p> + <p> + "Wherefore," will say the unfortunate, from whom his destiny has + rigorously withheld those benefits which have been lavished on so many + others; "wherefore ravish from me an error that is dear to me? Wherefore + annihilate to me a being, whose consoling idea dries up the source of my + tears—who serves to calm my sorrows? Wherefore deprive me of an + object which I represent to myself as a compassionate, tender father; who + reproves me in this world, but into whose arms I throw myself with + confidence, when the whole of nature appears to have abandoned me? + Supposing it no more than a chimera, the unhappy have occasion for it, to + guarantee them against frightful despair: is it not cruel, is it not + inhuman, to be desirous of plunging them into a vacuum, by seeking to + undeceive them? Is it not an useful error, preferable to those truths + which deprive the mind of every consolation, which do not hold forth any + relief from its sorrows?" + </p> + <p> + Thus will equally reason the Negro, the Mussulman, the Brachman, and + others. We shall reply to these enthusiasts, no! truth can never render + you unhappy; it is this which really consoles us; it is a concealed + treasure, much superior to all the superstitions ever invented by fear; it + can cheer the heart; give it courage to support the burthens of life; make + us smile under adversity; elevate the soul; render it active; furnishes it + with means to resist the attacks of fate; to combat misfortunes with + success. This will shew clearly that the good and evil of life are + distributed with an equal hand, without respect to man's peculiar + comforts; that all beings are equally regarded in the universe; that every + thing is submitted to necessary laws; that man has no right whatever to + think himself a being peculiarly favoured—who is exempted from the + common operations of the eternal routine; that it is folly to think he is + the only being considered—one for whose enjoyment alone every thing + is produced; an attention to facts will suffice to put an end to this + delusion, however pleasant may be the indulgence of such a notion; the + most superficial glance of the eye will be sufficient to undeceive us in + the idea, that he is the <i>final cause</i> of the creation—the + constant object of the labours of nature, or of its Author. Let us + seriously ask him, if he does not witness good constantly blended with + evil? If he does not equally partake of them with the other beings in + nature? To be obstinately bent to see only the evil, is as irrational as + to be willing only to notice the good. Providence seems to be just as much + occupied for one class of beings as for another. We see the calm succeed + the storm; sickness give place to health; the blessings of peace follow + the calamities of war; the earth in every country bring forth roots + necessary for the nourishment of man, produce others suitable to his + destruction. Each individual of the human species is a compound of good + and bad qualities; all nations present a varied spectacle of virtues, + growing up beside vices; that which gladdens one being, plunges another + into sadness—no event takes place that does not give birth to + advantages for some, to disadvantages for others. Insects find a safe + retreat in the ruin of the palace, which crushes man in its fall; man by + his death furnishes food for myriads of contemptible insects; animals are + destroyed by thousands that he may increase his bulk; linger out for a + season a feverish existence. We see beings engaged in perpetual hostility, + each living at his neighbour's expence; the one banquetting upon that + which causes the desolation of the other; some luxuriously growing into + flesh upon the misery which wears others into skeletons—profiting by + misfortunes, rioting upon disasters, which ultimately, reciprocally + destroy them. The most deadly poisons spring up beside the most wholesome + fruits the earth equally nourishes the fatal steel which terminates man's + career, and the fruitful corn that prolongs his existence; the bane and + its antidote are near neighbours, repose on the same bosom, ripen under + the same sun, equally court the hand of the incautious stranger. The + rivers which man believes flow for no other purpose than to irrigate his + residence, sometimes swell their waters, overtop their banks, inundate his + fields, overturn his dwelling, and sweep away the flock and shepherd. The + ocean, which he vainly imagines was only collected together to facilitate + his commerce supply him with fish, and wash his shores; often wrecks his + ships, frequently bursts its boundaries, lays waste his lands, destroys + the produce of his industry, and commits the most frightful ravages. The + halcyon, delighted with the tempest, voluntarily mingles with the storm; + rides contentedly upon the surge; rejoiced by the fearful howlings of the + northern blast, plays with happy buoyancy upon the foaming billows, that + have ruthlessly dashed in pieces the vessel of the unfortunate mariner; + who, plunged into an abyss of misery, with tremulous emotion clings to the + wreck; views with horrific despair, the premature destruction of his + indulged hopes; sighs deeply at the thoughts of home; with aching heart, + thinks of the cherished friends his streaming eyes will never more behold + in an agony of soul dwells upon the faithful affection of an adored wife, + who will never again repose her drooping head upon his manly bosom; grows + wild with the appalling remembrance of beloved children, his wearied arms + will never more encircle with parental fondness; then sinks for ever, the + unhappy victim of circumstances that fill with glee the fluttering bird, + who sees him yield to the overwhelming force of the infuriate waves. The + conqueror displays his military skill, fights a sanguinary battle, puts + his enemy to the rout, lays waste his country, slaughters thousands of his + fellows, plunges whole districts into tears, fills the land with the moans + of the fatherless, the wailings of the widow, in order that the crows may + have a banquet—that ferocious beasts may gluttonously gorge + themselves with human gore—that worms may riot in luxury. + </p> + <p> + Thus when there is a question concerning an agent we see act so variously; + whose motives seem sometimes to be advantageous, sometimes disadvantageous + for the human race; at least each individual will judge after the peculiar + mode in which he is himself affected; there will consequently be no fixed + point, no general standard in the opinions men will form to themselves. + Indeed our mode of judging will always be governed by our manner of + seeing, by our way of feeling. This will depend upon our temperament, + which itself springs out of our organization, and the peculiarity of the + circumstances in which we are placed; these can never be the same for all + the beings of our species. These individual modes of being affected, then, + will always furnish the colours of the portrait which man may paint to + himself of the Divinity; it must therefore be obvious they can never be + determinate—can have no fixity—can never be reduced to any + graduated scale; the inductions which they may draw from them, can never + be either constant or uniform; each will always judge after himself, will + never see any thing but himself or his own peculiar situation in the + picture he delineates. + </p> + <p> + This granted, the man who has a contented, sensible soul, with a lively + imagination, will paint the Divinity under the most charming traits; he + will believe that he sees in the whole of nature nothing but proofs of + benevolence, evidence of goodness, because it will unceasingly cause him + agreeable sensations. In his poetical extacy he will imagine he every + where perceives the impression of a perfect intelligence—of an + infinite wisdom—of a providence tenderly occupied with the welfare + of man; self-love joining itself to these exalted qualities, will put the + finishing hand to his persuasion, that the universe is made solely for the + human race; he will strive in imagination to kiss with transport the hand + from which he believes he receives so many benefits; touched with his + kindness, gratified with the perfume of roses whose thorns he does not + perceive, or which his extatic delirium prevents him from feeling, he will + think he can never sufficiently acknowledge the necessary effects, which + he will look upon as indubitable testimony of the divine predilection for + man. Completely inebriated with these feelings, this enthusiast will not + behold those sorrows, will not notice that confusion of which the universe + is the theatre: or if it so happens, he cannot prevent himself from being + a witness, he will be persuaded that in the views of an indulgent + providence, these calamities are necessary to conduct man to a higher + state of felicity; the reliance which he has in the Divinity, upon whom he + imagines they depend, induces him to believe, that man only suffers for + his good; that this being, who is fruitful in resources, will know how to + make him reap advantage from the evils which he experiences in this world: + his mind thus pre-occupied, from thence sees nothing that does not elicit + his admiration call forth his gratitude; excite his confidence; even those + effects which are the most natural, the most necessary, appear in his eyes + miracles of benevolence; prodigies of goodness: he shuts his eyes to the + disorders which could bring these amiable qualities into question: the + most cruel calamities, the most afflicting events, the most heart-rending + circumstances, cease to be disorders in his eyes, and do nothing, more + than furnish him with new proofs of the divine perfections; he persuades + himself that what appears defective or imperfect, is only so in + appearance; he admires the wisdom, acknowledges the bounty of the + Divinity, even in those effects which are the most terrible for his race—most + suitable to discourage his species—most fraught with misery for his + fellow. + </p> + <p> + It is, without doubt, to this happy disposition of the human mind, in some + beings of his order, that is to be ascribed the system of <i>Optimism</i>, + by which enthusiasts, furnished with a romantic imagination, seem to have + renounced the evidence of their senses: to find that even for man every + thing is good in nature, where the good has constantly its concomitant + evil, and where minds less prejudiced, less poetical, would judge that + every thing is only that which it can be—that the good and the evil + are equally necessary—that they have their source in the nature of + things; moreover, in order to attribute any particular character to the + events that take place, it would be needful to know the aim of the whole: + now the whole cannot have an aim, because if it had a tendency, an aim, or + end, it would no longer be the whole, seeing that that to which it tended + would be a part not included. + </p> + <p> + It will be asserted by some, that the evils which we behold in this world + are only relative, merely apparent; that they prove nothing against the + good: but does not man almost uniformly judge after his own mode of + feeling; after his manner of co-existing with those causes by which he is + encompassed; which constitute the order of nature with relation to + himself; consequently, he ascribes wisdom and goodness to all that which + affects him pleasantly, disorder to that state of things by which he is + injured. Nevertheless every thing which we witness in the world conspires + to prove to us, that whatever is, is necessary; that nothing is done by + chance; that all the events, good or bad, whether for us or for beings of + a different order, are brought about by causes acting after certain and + determinate laws; that nothing can he a sufficient warrantry in us to + clothe with any one of our human qualities, either nature or the + motive-power which has been given to her. + </p> + <p> + With respect to those who pretend that supreme wisdom will know how to + draw the greatest benefits for us, even out of the bosom of those + calamities which it is permitted we shall experience in this world; we + shall ask them, if they are themselves the confidents of the Divinity; or + upon what they found these assertions so flattering to their hopes? They + will, without doubt, tell us they judge by analogy; that from the actual + proofs of goodness and wisdom, they have a just right to conclude in + favour of future bounty. Would it not be a fair reply to ask, If they + reason by analogy, and man has not been rendered completely happy in this + world, what analogy informs them he will be so in another? If, according + to their own shewing, man is sometimes made the victim of evil in his + present existence, in order that he may attain a greater good, does not + analogical reasoning, which they say they adopt, clearly warrant a + deduction, that the same afflictions, for the same purposes, will be + equally proper, equally requisite in the world to come? + </p> + <p> + Thus this language founds itself upon ruinous hypotheses, which have for + their bases only a prejudiced imagination. It, in fact, signifies nothing + more than that man once persuaded, without any evidence, of his future + happiness, will not believe it possible he can be permitted to be unhappy: + but might it not be inquired what testimony does he find, what substantive + knowledge has he obtained of the peculiar good that results to the human + species from those sterilities, from those famines, from those contagions, + from those sanguinary conflicts, which cause so many millions of men to + perish; which unceasingly depopulate the earth, and desolate the world we + inhabit? Is there any one who has sufficient compass of comprehension to + ascertain the advantages that result from the evils that besiege us on all + sides? Do we not daily witness beings consecrated to misfortune, from the + moment they quitted the womb of the parent who brought them into + existence, until that which re-committed them to the earth, to sleep in + peace with their fathers; who with great difficulty found time to respire; + lived the constant sport of fortune; overwhelmed with affliction, immersed + in grief, enduring the most cruel reverses? Who is to measure the precise + quantity of misery required to derive a certain portion of good? Who is to + say when the measure of evil will be full which it is necessary to suffer? + </p> + <p> + The most enthusiastic Optimists, the <i>Theists</i> themselves, the + partizans of <i>Natural Religion</i>, as well as the most credulous and + superstitious, are obliged to recur to the system of another life, to + remedy the evils man is decreed to suffer in the present; but have they + really any just foundation to suppose the next world will afford him a + happiness denied him in this? If it is necessary to recur to a doctrine so + little probable as that of a future existence, by what chain of reasoning + do they establish their opinion, that when he shall no longer have organs, + by the aid of which he is at present alone enabled either to enjoy or to + suffer, he shall be able to compensate the evils he has endured; to enjoy + a felicity, to partake of a pleasure this organic structure has refused + him while on his pilgrimage through the land of his fathers. + </p> + <p> + From this it will be seen, that the proofs of a sovereign intelligence, or + of a magnified human quality drawn from the order, from the harmony, from + the beauty of the universe, are never more than those which are derived + from men who are organized and modified after a certain mode; or whose + cheerful imagination is so constructed as to give birth to agreeable + chimeras which they embellish according to their fancy: these illusions, + however, must be frequently dissipated even in themselves, whenever their + machine becomes deranged; when sorrows assail them, when misfortune + corrodes their mind; the spectacle of nature, which under certain + circumstances has appeared to them so delightful, so seducing, must then + give place to disorder, must yield to confusion. A man of melancholy + temperament, soured by misfortunes, made irritable by infirmities, cannot + view nature and her author under the same perspective, as the healthy man + of a sprightly humour, who is contented with every thing. Deprived of + happiness, the fretful man can only find disorder, can see nothing but + deformity, can find nothing but subjects to afflict himself with; he only + contemplates the universe as the theatre of malice, as the stage for + tyrants to execute their vengeance; he grows superstitious, he gives way + to credulity, and not unfrequently becomes cruel, in order to serve a + master whom he believes he has offended. + </p> + <p> + In consequence of these ideas, which have their growth in an unhappy + temperament, which originate in a peevish humour, which are the offspring + of a disturbed imagination, the superstitious are constantly infected with + terror, are the slaves to mistrust, the creatures of discontent, + continually in a state of fearful alarm. Nature cannot have charms for + them; her countless beauties pass by unheeded; they do not participate in + her cheerful scenes; they look upon this world, so marvellous to the happy + man, so good to the contented enthusiast, as a <i>valley of tears</i>, in + which a vindictive fate has placed them only to expiate crimes committed + either by themselves or by their fathers; they consider themselves as sent + here for no other purpose than to be the sharers of calamity; the sport of + a capricious fortune; that they are the children of sorrow, destined to + undergo the severest trials, to the end that they may everlastingly arrive + at a new existence, in which they shall be either happy or miserable, + according to their conduct towards the ministers of a being who holds + their destiny in his hands. These dismal notions have been the source of + all the irrational systems that have ever prevailed; they have given birth + to the most revolting practices, currency to the most absurd customs. + History abounds with details of the most atrocious cruelties, under the + imposing name of public worship; nothing has been considered either too + fantastical or too flagitious by the votaries of superstition. Parents + have immolated their children; lovers have sacrificed the objects of their + affection; friends have destroyed each other: the most bloody disputes + have been fomented; the most interminable animosities have been + engendered, to gratify the whim of implacable priests, who by crafty + inventions have obtained an influence over the people; to please blind + zealots, who have never been able either to give fixity to their ideas, or + to define their own feelings. Idle dreamers nourished with bile, + intoxicated with theologic fury—atrabilarians, whose melancholic + humour frequently disposes them to wickedness—visionaries, whose + devious imaginations, heated with intemperate zeal, generally leads them + to the extremes of fanaticism, working upon ignorance, whose usual bias is + credulity, have incessantly disturbed the harmony of mankind, kindled the + inextinguishable flame of discord, and in an almost uninterrupted + succession, strewed the earth with the mangled carcasses of the + multitudinous victims to mad-brained error, whose only crime has been + their incapacity to dream according to the rules prescribed by these + infuriate maniacs; although these have never been uniform—never + assimilated in any two countries—never borne the same features in + any two ages, nor even had the united concurrence of the persecuting + contemporaries. + </p> + <p> + It is then in the diversity of temperament, arising from variety of + organization—in the contrariety of passions, springing out of this + miscellany, modified by the most opposite circumstances, that must be + sought the difference we find in the opinions of the theist, the optimist, + the happy enthusiast, the zealot, the devotee, the superstitious of all + denominations; they are all equally irrational—the dupes of their + imagination—the blind children of error. What one contemplates under + a favorable point of view, the other never looks upon but on the dark + side; that which is the object of the most sedulous research to one set, + is that which the others most seek to avoid: each insists he is right; no + one offers the least shadow of substantive proof of what he asserts; each + points out the great importance of his mission, yet cannot even agree with + his colleagues in the embassy, either upon the nature of their + instructions, or the means to be adopted. It is thus whenever man sets + forth a false supposition, all the reasonings he makes on it are only a + long tissue of errors, which entail on him an endless series of + misfortunes; every time he renounces the evidence of his senses, it is + impossible to calculate the bounds at which his imagination will stop; + when he once quits the road of experience, when he travels out of nature, + when he loses sight of his reason, to strike into the labyrinths of + conjecture, it is difficult to ascertain where his folly will lead him—into + what mischievous swamps this <i>ignis fatuus</i> of the mind may beguile + his wandering steps. It is certainly true, the ideas of the happy + enthusiast will be less dangerous to himself, less baneful to others, than + those of the atrabilarious fanatic, whose temperament may render him both + cowardly and cruel; nevertheless the opinions of the one and of the other + will not be less chimerical; the only difference will be, that of the + first will produce agreeable, cheerful dreams; while that of the second + will present the most appalling visions, terrific spectres, the fruit of a + peevish transport of the brain: there will, however, never be more than a + step between them all; the smallest revolution in the machine, a slight + infirmity, an unforeseen affliction, suffices to change the course of the + humours—to vitiate the temperament—to endanger the + organization—to overturn the whole system of opinions of the + happiest. As soon as the portrait is found disfigured, the beautiful order + of things is overthrown relatively to himself; melancholy grapples him—pusillanimity + benumbs his faculties—by degrees plunges, him into the rankest + depths of gloomy superstition; he then degenerates into all those + irregularities which are the dismal harvest of fanatic ignorance ploughed + with credulity. + </p> + <p> + Those ideas, which have no archetype but in the imagination of man, must + necessarily take their complexion from his own character; must be clothed + with his own passions; must constantly follow the revolutions of his + machine; be lively or gloomy; favourable or prejudicial; friendly or + inimical; sociable or savage; humane or cruel; according as he whose brain + they inhabit shall himself be disposed; in fact, they can never be more + than the shadow of the substance he himself interposes between the light + and the ground on which they are thrown. A mortal plunged from a state of + happiness into misery, whose health merges into sickness, whose joy is + changed into affliction, cannot in these vicissitudes preserve the same + ideas; these naturally depend every instant upon the variations, which + physical sensations oblige his organs to undergo. It will not therefore + appear strange that these opinions should be fluctuating, when they depend + upon the state of the nervous fluid, upon the greater or less portion of + igneous matter floating in the sanguinary vessels. + </p> + <p> + <i>Theism</i>, or what is called <i>Natural Religion</i>, cannot have + certain principles; those who profess it must necessarily be subject to + vary in their opinions—to fluctuate in their conduct, which flows + out of them. A system founded upon wisdom and intelligence, which can + never contradict itself, when circumstances change will presently be + converted into fanaticism; rapidly degenerate into superstition; such a + system, successively meditated by enthusiasts of very distinct characters, + must of necessity experience vicissitudes, and quickly depart from its + primitive simplicity. The greater part of those philosophers who have been + disposed to substitute theism for superstition, have not felt that it was + formed to corrupt itself—to degenerate. Striking examples, however, + prove this fatal truth. Theism is almost every where corrupted; it has by + degrees given way to those superstitions, to those extravagant sects, to + those prejudicial opinions with which the human species is degraded. As + soon as man consents to acknowledge invisible powers out of nature, upon + which his restless mind will never be able invariably to fix his ideas—which + his imagination alone will be capable of painting to him; whenever he + shall not dare to consult his reason relatively to those powers, it must + necessarily be, that the first false step leads him astray, that his + conduct as well as his opinions becomes in the long run perfectly absurd. + </p> + <p> + Those are usually called Theists, who, undeceived upon the greater number + of grosser errors to which the uninformed, the superstitiously ignorant, + tend the most determined support, simply hold the notion of unknown agents + endowed with intelligence, wisdom, power and goodness, in short, full of + infinite perfections, whom they distinguish from nature, but whom they + clothe after their own fashion; to whom they ascribe their own limited + views; whom they make act according to their own absurd passions. The + religion of Abraham appears to have originally been a kind of theism, + imagined to reform the superstition of the Chaldeans; Moses modified it, + and gave it the Judaical form. Socrates was a theist, who lost his life in + his attack on polytheism; his disciple Aristocles, or Plato, as he was + afterwards called from his large shoulders, embellished the theism of his + master, with the mystical colours which he borrowed from the Egyptian and + Chaldean priests, which he modified in his own poetical brain, and + preserved a remnant of polytheism. The disciples of Plato, such as + Proclus, Ammonius, Jamblicus. Plotinus, Longinus, Porphyrus, and others, + dressed it up still more fantastically, added a great deal of + superstitious mummery, blended it with magic, and other unintelligible + doctrines. The first doctors of Christianity were Platonists, who combined + the reformed Judaism with the philosophy taught in Academia. Mahomet, in + combating the polytheism of his country, seems to have been desirous of + restoring the primitive theism of Abraham, and his son Ishmael; yet this + has now seventy-two sects. Thus it will be obvious, that theism has no + fixed point, no standard, no common measure more than other systems: that + it runs from one supposition to another, to find in what manner evil has + crept into the world. Indeed it has been for this purpose, which perhaps + after all will never be satisfactorily explained, that the doctrine of + free-agency was introduced; that the fable of Prometheus and the box of + Pandora was imagined; that the history of the Titanes was invented; + notwithstanding, it must be evident that these things as well as all the + other trappings of superstition, are not more difficult of comprehension + than the immaterial substances of the theists; the mind who can admit that + beings devoid of parts, destitute of organs, without bulk, can move + matter, think like man, have the moral qualities of human nature, need not + hesitate to allow that ceremonies, certain motions of the body, words, + rites, temples, statues, can equally contain secret virtues; has no + occasion to withhold its faith from the concealed powers of magic, + theurgy, enchantments, charms, talismans, &c.; can shew no good reason + why it should not accredit inspirations, dreams, visions, omens, + soothsayers, metamorphoses, and all the host of occult sciences: when + things so contradictory to the dictates of reason, so completely opposed + to good sense are freely admitted, there can no longer be an thing which + ought to possess the right to make credulity revolt; those who give + sanction to the one, may without much hesitation believe whatever else is + offered to their credence. It would be impossible to mark the precise + point at which imagination ought to arrest itself—the exact boundary + that should circumscribe belief—the true dose of folly that may be + permitted them; or the degree of indulgence that can with safety be + extended to those priests who are in the habit of teaching so variously, + so contradictorily, what man ought to think on the subjects they handle so + advantageously to themselves; who when it becomes a question what + remuneration is due from mankind for their unwearied exertions in his + favour, are, in spite of all their other differences, in the most perfect + union; except perhaps when they come to the division of the spoil: in + this, indeed, the apple of discord sometimes takes a tremendous roll. Thus + it will be clear that there can be no substantive grounds for separating + the theists from the most superstitious; that it becomes impossible to fix + the line of demarcation, which divides them from the most credulous of + men; to shew the land-marks by which they can be discriminated from those + who reason with the least conclusive persuasion. If the theist refuses to + follow up the fanatic in every step of his cullibility, he is at least + more inconsequent than the last, who having admitted upon hearsay an + inconsistent, whimsical doctrine, also adopts upon report the ridiculous, + strange means which it furnishes him. The first sets forth with an absurd + supposition, of which he rejects the necessary consequences; the other + admits both the principle and the conclusion. There are no degrees in + fiction any more than in truth. If we admit the superstition, we are bound + to receive every thing which its ministers promulgate, as emanating from + its principle. None of the reveries of superstition embrace any thing more + incredible than immateriality; these reveries are only corollaries drawn + with more or less subtilty from unintelligible subjects, by those who have + an interest in supporting the system. The inductions which dreamers have + made, by dint of meditating on impenetrable materials, are nothing more + than ingenious conclusions, which have been drawn with wonderful accuracy, + from unknown premises, that are modestly offered to the sanction of + mankind by enthusiasts, who claim an unconditional assent, because they + assure us no one of the human race is in a capacity either to see, feel, + or comprehend the object of their contemplation. Does not this somewhat + remind us of what Rabelais describes as the employment of Queen Whim's + officers, in his fifth book and twenty-second chapter? + </p> + <p> + Let us then acknowledge, that the man who is this most credulously + superstitious, reasons in a more conclusive manner, or is at least more + consistent in his credulity, than those, who, after having admitted a + certain position of which they have no one idea, stop short all at once, + and refuse to accredit that system of conduct which is the immediate, the + necessary result of a radical and primitive error. As soon as they + subscribe to a principle fatally opposed to reason, by what right do they + dispute its consequences, however absurd they may be found? We cannot too + often repeat, for the happiness of mankind, that the human mind, let it + torture itself as much as it will, when it quits visible nature leads + itself astray; for want of an intelligent guide it wanders in tracks that + bewilder its powers, and is quickly obliged, to return into that with + which it has at least some, acquaintance. If man mistakes nature and her + energies, it is because he does not sufficiently study her—because + he does not submit to the test of experience the phenomena he beholds; if + he will obstinately deprive her of motion, he can no longer have any ideas + of her. Does, he, however, elucidate his embarrassments, by submitting her + action to the agency of a being of which he makes himself the model? Does + he think he forms a god, when he assembles into one heterogeneous mass, + his own discrepant qualities, magnified until his optics are no longer + competent to recognize them, and then unites to them certain abstract + properties of which he cannot form to himself any one conception? Does he, + in fact, do more than collect together that which becomes, in consequence + of its association, perfectly unintelligible? Yet, strange as it may + appear, when he no longer understands himself—when his mind, lost in + its own fictions, becomes inadequate to decipher the characters he has + thus promiscuously assembled—when he has huddled together a heap of + incomprehensible, abstract qualities, which he is obliged to acknowledge + are the mere creatures of imagination, not within the reach of human + intellect, he firmly persuades himself he has made a most accurate and + beautiful portrait of the Divinity; he ostentatiously displays his + picture, demands the eulogy of the spectator, and quarrels with all those + who do not agree to adulate his creative powers, by adopting the + inconceivable being he holds forth to their worship; in short, to question + the existence of his extravaganza, rouses his most bitter reproaches; + elicits his everlasting scorn; entails on the incredulous his eternal + hatred. + </p> + <p> + On the other hand, what could we expect from such a being, as they have + supposed him to be? What could we consistently ask of him? How make an + immaterial being, who has neither organs, space, point, or contact, + understand that modification of matter called voice? Admit that this is + the being who moves nature—who establishes her laws—who gives + to beings their various essences—who endows them with their + respective properties; if every thing that takes place is the fruit of his + infinite providence—the proof of his profound wisdom, to what end + shall we address our prayers to him? Shall we solicit him to acknowledge + that the wisdom and providence with which we have clothed him, are in fact + erroneous, by entreating him to alter in our favour his eternal laws? + Shall we give him to understand our wisdom exceeds his own, by asking, him + for our pleasure to change the properties of bodies—to annihilate + his immutable decrees—to trace back the invariable course of things—to + make beings act in opposition to the essences with which he has thought it + right to invest them? Will he at our intercession prevent a body ponderous + and hard by its nature, such as a stone, for example, from wounding, in + its fall a sensitive being such as the human frame? Again, should we not, + in fact, challenge impossibilities, if the discordant attributes brought + into union by the theologians were correct; would not immutability oppose + itself to omnipotence; mercy to the exercise of rigid justice; + omniscience, to the changes that might be required in foreseen plans? In + physics, in consequence of the general research after a perpetual motion, + science has drawn forth the discovery, that by amalgamating metals of + contrary properties, the contractile powers of one kind, under given + circumstances which cause the dilation of the other, by their opposite + tendencies neutralize the actual effects of each, taken separately, and + thus produce an equality in the oscillations, that, neither possessed + individually. + </p> + <p> + It will perhaps, be insisted, that the infinite science of the Creator of + all things, is acquainted with resources in the beings he has formed, + which are concealed from imbecile mortals; that consequently without + changing any thing, either in the laws of nature, or in the essence of + things, he is competent to produce effects which surpass the comprehension + of our feeble understanding; that these, effects will in no wise be + contrary to that order which he himself has established in nature. + Granted: but then I reply, <i>first</i>, that every thing which is + conformable to the nature of things, can neither be called supernatural + nor miraculous: many things are, unquestionably, above our comprehension; + but then all that is operated in the world is natural—grows out of + those immutable laws by which nature is regulated. In the <i>second</i> + place, it will be requisite to observe, that by the word miracle an effect + is designed, of which, for want of understanding nature, she is believed + incapable. In the <i>third</i> place, it is worthy of remark, that the + theologians, almost universally, insist that by miracle is meant not an + extraordinary effort of nature, but an effect directly opposite to her + laws, which nevertheless they equally challenge to have been prescribed by + the Divinity. Buddaeus says, "a miracle is an operation by which the laws + of nature, upon which depend the order and the preservation of the + universe, are suspended." If, however, the Deity, in those phenomena that + most excite our surprise, does nothing more than give play to springs + unknown to mortals, there is, then, nothing in nature, which, in this + sense, may not be looked upon as a miracle; because the cause by which a + stone falls is as unknown to us, as that which makes our globe turn on its + own axis. Thus, to explain the phenomena of nature by a miracle, is, in + other words, to say we are ignorant of the actuating causes; to attribute + them to the Divinity, is to agree we do not comprehend the resources of + nature: it is little better than accrediting magic. To attribute to a + sovereignly intelligent, immutable, provident, wise being, those miracles + by which he derogates from his own laws, is at one blow to annihilate all + these qualities: it is an inconsistency that would shame a child. It + cannot be supposed that omnipotence has need of miracles to govern the + universe, nor to convince his creatures, whose minds and hearts must be in + his own hands. The last refuge of the theologian, when driven off all + other ground, is the possibility of every thing he asserts, couched in the + dogma, "that nothing is impossible to the Divinity." He makes this + asseveration with a degree of self-complacency, with an air of triumph, + that would almost persuade one he could not be mistaken; most assuredly, + with those who dip no further than the surface, he carries complete + conviction. But we must take leave to examine a little the nature of this + proposition, and we do apprehend that a very slight degree of + consideration will shew that it is untenable. In the <i>first</i> place, + as we have before observed, the possibility of a thing by no means proves + its absolute existence: a thing may be extremely possible, and yet not be. + <i>Secondly</i>, if this was once to become an admitted argument, there + would be, in fact, an end of all morality and religion. The Bishop of + Chester, Doctor John Wilkins, says, "would not such men be generally + accounted out of their wits, who could please themselves by entertaining + actual hopes of any thing, merely upon account of the possibility of it, + or torment themselves with actual fears of all such evils as are possible? + Is there any thing imaginable wore wild and extravagant amongst those in + bedlam than this would be?" <i>Thirdly</i>, the impossibility would + reasonably appear to be on the other side, so far from nothing being + impossible, every thing that is erroneous would seem to be actually so; + the Divinity could not possibly either love vice, cherish crime, be + pleased with depravity, or commit wrong; this decidedly turns the argument + against them; they must either admit the most monstrous of all + suppositions, or retire from behind the shield with which they have + imagined they rendered themselves invulnerable. + </p> + <p> + To those who may be inclined to inquire, whether it would not be better + that all things were operated by a good, wise, intelligent Being, than by + a blind nature, in which not one consoling quality is found; by a fatal + necessity always inexorable to human intreaty? It may be replied, <i>first</i>, + that our interest does not decide the reality of things, and that when + this should be even wore advantageous than it is pointed out, it would + prove nothing. <i>Secondly</i>, that as we are obliged to admit some + things are operated by nature, it is certainly on the side of probability + that she performs the others; especially as her capabilities are more + substantively proved by every age as it advances. <i>Thirdly</i>, that + nature duly studied furnishes every thing necessary to render us as, happy + as our essence admits. When, guided by experience, we shall consult her, + with cultivated reason; she will discover to us our duties, that is to + say, the indispensable means to which her eternal and necessary laws have + attached our preservation, our own happiness, and that of society. It is + decidedly in her bosom that we shall find wherewith to satisfy our + physical wants; whatever is out of nature, can have no existence + relatively to ourselves. + </p> + <p> + Nature, then, is not a step-mother to us; we do not depend upon an + inexorable destiny. Let us therefore endeavour to become more familiar + with her resources; she will procure us a multitude of benefits when we + shall pay her the attention she deserves: when we shall feel disposed to + consult her, she will supply us with the requisites to alleviate both our + physical and moral evils: she only punishes us with rigour, when, + regardless of her admonitions, we plunge into excesses that disgrace us. + Has the voluptuary any reason to complain of the sharp pains inflicted by + the gout, when experience, if he had but attended to its counsels, has so + often warned him, that the grossness of sensual indulgence must inevitably + amass in his machine those humours which give birth to the agony he so + acutely feels? Has the superstitious bigot any cause for repining at the + misery of his uncertain ideas, when an attentive examination of that + nature, he holds of such small account, would have convinced him that the + idols under whom he trembles, are nothing but personifications of herself, + disguised under some other name? It is evidently by incertitude, discord, + blindness, delirium, she chastises those who refuse to, acknowledge the + justice of her claims. + </p> + <p> + In the mean time, it cannot be denied, that a pure Theism, or what is + called Natural Religion, may not be preferable to superstition, in the + same manner as reform has banished many of the abuses of those countries + who have embraced it; but there is nothing short of an unlimited and + inviolable liberty of thought, that can permanently assure the repose of + the mind. The opinions of men are only dangerous when they are restrained, + or when it is imagined necessary to make others think as we ourselves + think. No opinions, not even those of superstition itself, would be + dangerous, if the superstitious did not think themselves obliged to + enforce their adoption, or had not the power to persecute those who + refused. It is this prejudice, which, for the benefit of mankind, it is + essential to annihilate; and if the thing be not achievable, then the next + object which philosophy may reasonably propose to itself, will be to make + the depositaries of power feel that they never ought to permit their + subjects to commit evil for either superstitious or religious opinions. In + this case, wars would be almost unheard of amongst men: instead of + beholding the melancholy spectacle of man cutting the throat of his fellow + man, because this cannot see with his eyes, we shall witness him + essentially labouring to his own happiness by promoting that of his + neighbour; cultivating the earth in peace; quietly bringing forth the + productions of nature, instead of puzzling his brain with theological + disputes, which can never be of the smallest advantage, except to the + priests. It must be a self-evident truth, that an argument by men, upon + that which is not accessible to man, <i>could only have been invented by + knaves, who, like the professors of legerdemain, were determined to riot + luxuriously on the ignorance and credulity of mankind.</i> + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0010" id="link2H_4_0010"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. VIII. + </h2> + <p> + <i>Examination of the Advantages which result from Man's Notions on the + Divinity.—Of their Influence upon Mortals;—upon Politics;—upon + Science;—upon the Happiness of Nations, and that of Individuals.</i> + </p> + <p> + The slender foundation of those ideas which men form to themselves of + their gods, must have appeared obvious in what has preceded; the proofs + which have been offered in support of the existence of immaterial + substances, have been examined; the want of harmony that exists in the + opinions upon this subject, which all concur in agreeing to be equally + impossible to be known to the inhabitants of the earth, has been shewn; + the incompatibility of the attributes with which, theology has clothed + incorporeity, has been explained. It has been proved, that the idols which + man sets up for adoration, have usually had their birth, either in the + bosom of misfortune, when ignorance was at a loss to account for the + calamities of the earth upon natural principles, or else have been the + shapeless fruit of melancholy, working upon an alarmed mind, coupled with + enthusiasm and an unbridled imagination. It has been pointed out how these + prejudices, transmitted by tradition from father to son, grafting + themselves upon infant minds, cultivated by education, nourished by fear, + corroborated by habit, have been maintained by authority; perpetuated by + example. In short, every thing must have distinctly evidenced to us, that + the ideas of the gods, so generally diffused over the earth, has been + little more than an universal delusion of the human race. It remains now + to examine if this error has been useful. + </p> + <p> + It needs little to prove error can never be advantageous for mankind; it + is ever founded upon his ignorance, which is itself an acknowledged evil; + it springs out of the blindness of his mind to acknowledged truths, and + his want of experience, which it must be admitted are prejudicial to his + interests: the more importance, therefore, he shall attach to these + errors, the more fatal will be the consequences resulting from their + adoption. Bacon, the illustrious sophist, who first brought philosophy out + of the schools, had great reason when he said, "The worst of all things is + deified error." Indeed, the mischiefs springing from superstition or + religious errors, have been, and always will be, the most terrible in + their consequences—the most extensive in their devastation. The more + these errors are respected, the more play they give to the passions; the + more value is attached to them, the more the mind is disturbed; the more + they are insisted upon, the more irrational they render those, who are + seized with the rage for proselytism; the more they are cherished, the + greater influence they have on the whole conduct of our lives. Indeed, + there can he but little likelihood that he who renounces his reason, in + the thing which he considers as most essential to his happiness, will + listen to it on any other occasion. + </p> + <p> + The slightest reflection will afford ample proof to this sad truth: in + those fatal notions which man has cherished on this subject, are to be + traced the true sources of all those prejudices, the fountain of all those + sorrows, to which he is the victim. Nevertheless, as we have elsewhere + said, utility ought to be the only standard, the uniform scale, by which + to form a judgment on either the opinions, the institutions, the systems, + or the actions of intelligent beings; it is according to the measure of + happiness which these things procure for us, that we ought either to cover + them with our esteem, or expose them to our contempt. Whenever they are + useless it is our duty to despise them; as soon as they become pernicious, + it is imperative to reject them; reason imperiously prescribes that our + detestation should be commensurate with the evils which they cause. + </p> + <p> + Taking these principles for a land-mark, which are founded on our nature, + which must appear incontestible to every reasonable being, with experience + for a beacon, let us coolly examine the effects which these notions have + produced on the earth. We have already, in more than one part of the work, + given a glimpse of the doctrine of that morals, which having only for + object the preservation of man, and his conduct in society, can have + nothing, in common with imaginary systems: it has been shewn, that the + essence of a sensitive, intelligent, rational being, properly meditated, + would discover motives competent to moderate the fury of his passions—to + induce him to resist his vicious propensities—to make him fly + criminal habits—to invite him to render himself useful to those + beings for whom his own necessities have a continual occasion; thus, to + endear himself to his, fellow mortals, to become respectable in his own + esteem. These motives will unquestionably be admitted to possess more + solidity, to embrace greater, potency, to involve more truth, than those + which are borrowed from systems that want stability; that assume more + shapes than there are languages; that are not tangible to the tact of + humanity; that must of necessity present a different perspective to all + who shall view them through the medium of prejudice. From what has been + advanced, it will be felt that education, which should make man in early + life contract good habits, adopt favorable dispositions, fortified by a + respect for public opinion, invigorated by ideas of decency, strengthened + by wholesome laws, corroborated by the desire of meriting the friendship + of others, stimulated by the fear of losing his own esteem, would be fully + adequate to accustom him to a laudable conduct, amply sufficient to divert + him from even those secret crimes, from which he is obliged to punish + himself by remorse; which costs him the most incessant labour to keep + concealed, by the dread of that shame, which must always follow their + publicity. Experience demonstrates in the clearest manner, that the + success of a first crime disposes him to commit a second; impunity leads + on to the third, this to a lamentable sequel that frequently closes a + wretched career with the most ignominious exhibition; thus the first + delinquency is the commencement of a habit: there is much less distance + from this to the hundredth, than from innocence to criminality: the man, + however, who lends himself to a series of bad actions, under even the + assurance of impunity, is most woefully deceived, because he cannot avoid + castigating himself: moreover, he cannot know at what point of iniquity he + shall stop. It has been shewn, that those punishments which society, for + its own preservation, has the right to inflict on those who disturb its + harmony, are more substantive, more efficacious, more salutary in their + effects, than all the distant torments held forth by the priests; they + intervene a more immediate obstacle to the stubborn propensities of those + obdurate wretches, who, insensible to the charms of virtue, are deaf to + the advantages that spring from its practice, than can be opposed by the + denunciations, held forth in an hereafter existence, which he is at the + same moment taught may be avoided by repentance, that shall only take + place when the ability to commit further wrong has ceased. In short, one + would be led to think it obvious to the slightest reflection, that + politics, founded upon the nature of man, upon the principles of society, + armed with equitable laws, vigilant over morals, faithful in rewarding + virtue, constant in visiting crime, would be more suitable to clothe + ethics with respectability, to throw a sacred mantle over moral goodness, + to lend stability to public virtue, than any authority that can be derived + from contested systems, the conduct of whose professors frequently + disgrace the doctrines they lay down, which after all seldom do more than + restrain those whose mildness of temperament effectually prevents them + from running into excess; those who, already given to justice, require no + coercion. On the other hand, we have endeavoured to prove that nothing can + be more absurd, nothing actually more dangerous, than attributing human + qualities to the Divinity which cannot but choose to find themselves in a + perpetual contradiction. + </p> + <p> + Plato has said "that virtue consists in resembling God." But how is man to + resemble a being, who, it is acknowledged, is incomprehensible to mankind—who + cannot be conceived by any of those means, by which he is alone capable of + having perceptions? If this being, who is shewn to man under such various + aspects, who is said to owe nothing to his creatures, is the author of all + the good, as well as all the evil that takes place, how can he be the + model for the conduct of the human race living together in society? At + most he can only follow one side of the character, because among his + fellows, he alone is reputed virtuous who does not deviate in his conduct + from justice; who abstains from evil; who performs with punctuality those + duties he owes to his fellows. If it be taken up, and insisted he is not + the author of the evil, only of the good, I say very well: that is + precisely what I wanted to know; you thereby acknowledge he is not the + author of every thing; we are no longer at issue; you are inconclusive to + your own premises, consequently ought not to demand an implicit reliance + on what you choose to assert. + </p> + <p> + But, replies the subtle theologian, that is not the affair; you must seek + it in the creed I have set forth—in the religion of which I am a + pillar. Very good: Is it then actually in the system of fanatics, that man + should draw up his ideas of virtue? Is it in the doctrines which these + codes hold forth, that he is to seek for a model? Alas! do they not + pourtray their idols: under the most unwholesome colours; do they not + represent them as following their caprice in every thing, who love or + hate, who choose or reject, who approve or condemn according to their + whim, who delight in carnage, who send discord amongst men, who act + irrationally, who commit wantonness, who sport with their feeble subjects, + who lay continual snares for them, who rigorously interdict the use of + their reason? What, let us seriously ask, would become of morality, if men + proposed to themselves such portraits for models! + </p> + <p> + It was, however, for the most part, systems of this temper that nations + adopted. At was in consequence of these principles that what has been + called religion in most countries, was far removed from being favourable + to morality; on the contrary, it often shook it to its foundation—frequently + left no vestige of its existence. It divided man, instead of drawing + closer the bonds of union; in the place of that mutual love, that + reciprocity of succour, which ought ever to distinguish human society, it + introduced hatred and persecution; it made them seize every opportunity to + cut each other's throat for speculative opinions, equally irrational; it + engendered the most violent heart-burnings—the most rancorous + animosities—the most sovereign contempt. The slightest difference in + their received opinions rendered them the most mortal enemies; separated + their interests for ever; made them despise each other; and seek every + means to render their existence miserable. For these theological + conjectures, nations become opposed to nations; the sovereign frequently + armed himself against his subjects; subjects waged war with their + sovereign; citizens gave activity to the most sanguinary hostility against + each other; parents detested their offspring; children plunged the pointed + steel, the barbed arrow, into the bosoms of those who gave them existence; + husbands and wives disunited, became the scourges of each other; relations + forgetting the ties of consanguinity, tore each other to pieces, or else + reciprocally consigned them to oblivion; all the bonds of society were + rent asunder; the social compact was broken up; society committed suicide: + whilst in the midst of this fearful wreck—regardless of the horrid + shrieks called forth by this dreadful confusion—unmindful of the + havock going forward on all sides—each pretended that he conformed + to the views of his idol, detailed to him by his priest—fulminated + by the oracles. Far from making himself any reproach, for the misery he + spread abroad, each lauded his own individual conduct; gloried in the + crimes he committed in support of his sacred cause. + </p> + <p> + The same spirit of maniacal fury pervaded the rites, the ceremonies, the + customs, which the worship, adopted by superstition, placed so much above + all the social virtues. In one country, tender mothers delivered up their + children to moisten with their innocent blood the altars of their idols; + in another, the people assembled, performed the ceremony of consolation to + their deities, for the outrages they committed against them, and finished + by immolating to their anger human victims; in another, a frantic + enthusiast lacerated his body, condemned himself for life to the most + rigorous tortures, to appease the wrath of his gods. The Jupiter of the + Pagans was a lascivious monster; the Moloch of the Phenicians was a + cannibal; the savage idol of the Mexican requires thousands of mortals to + bleed on his shrine, in order to satisfy his sanguinary appetite. + </p> + <p> + Such are the models superstition holds out to the imitation of man; is it + then surprising that the name of these despots became the signal for + mad-brained enthusiasm to exercise its outrageous fury; the standard under + which cowardice wreaked its cruelty; the watchword for the inhumanity of + nations to muster their barbarous strength; a sound which spreads terror + wherever its echo could reach; a continual pretext for the most barefaced + breaches of public decorum; for the most shameless violation of the moral + duties? It was the frightful character men gave of their gods, that + banished kindness from their hearts—virtue from their conduct—felicity + from their habitations—reason from their mind: almost every where it + was some idol, who was disturbed by the mode in which unhappy mortals + thought; this armed them with poignards against each other; made them + stifle the cries of nature; rendered them barbarous to themselves; + atrocious to their fellow creatures: in short, they became irrational, + breathed forth vengeance, outraged humanity, every time that, instigated + by the priest, they were inclined to imitate the gods of their idolatry, + to display their zeal, to render themselves acceptable in their temples. + </p> + <p> + It is not, then, in such systems, man ought to seek either for models of + virtue, or rules of conduct suitable to live in society. He needs human + morality, founded upon his own nature; built upon invariable experience; + submitted to reason. The ethics of superstition will always he prejudicial + to the earth; cruel masters cannot be well served, but by those who + resemble them: what then becomes of the great advantages which have been + imagined resulted to man, from the notions which have been unceasingly + infused into him of his gods? We see that almost all nations acknowledge + them; yet, to conform themselves to their views, they trampled under foot + the clearest rights of nature—the most evident duties of humanity; + they appeared to act as if it was only by madness the most incurable—by + folly the most preposterous—by the most flagitious crimes, committed + with an unsparing hand, that they hoped to draw down upon themselves the + favor of heaven—the blessings of the sovereign intelligence they so + much boast of serving with unabated zeal; with the most devotional fervor; + with the most unlimited obedience. As soon, therefore, as the priests give + them to understand their deities command the commission of crime, or + whenever there is a question of their respective creeds, although they are + wrapt in the most impenetrable obscurity, they make it a duty with + themselves to unbridle their rancour—to give loose to the most + furious passions; they mistake the clearest precepts of morality; they + credulously believe the remission of their own sins will be the reward of + their transgressions against their neighbour. Would it not be better to be + an inhabitant of Soldania in Africa, where never yet form of worship + entered, or the name of God resounded, than thus to pollute the land with + superstitious castigation—with the enmity of priests against each + other? + </p> + <p> + Indeed, it is not generally in those revered mortals, spread over the + earth to announce the oracles of the gods, that will be found the most + sterling virtues. These men, who think themselves so enlightened, who call + themselves the ministers of heaven, frequently preach nothing but hatred, + discord, and fury in its name: the fear of the gods, far from having a + salutary influence over their own morals, far from submitting them to a + wholesome discipline, frequently do nothing more than increase their + avarice, augment their ambition, inflate their pride, extend their + covetousness, render them obstinately stubborn, and harden their hearts. + We may see them unceasingly occupied in giving birth to the most lasting + animosities, by their unintelligible disputes. We see them hostilely + wrestling with the sovereign power, which they contend is subordinate to + their own. We see them arm the chiefs of nations against the legitimate + magistrates; distribute to the credulous multitude the most mortal + weapons, to massacre each other in the prosecution of those futile + controversies, which sacerdotal vanity clothes with the most interesting + importance. Do these men, who advance the beauty of their theories, who + menace the people with eternal vengeance, avail themselves of their own + marvellous notions to moderate their pride—to abate their vanity—to + lessen their cupidity—to restrain their turbulence—to bring + their vindictive humours under control? Are they, even in those countries + where their empire is established upon pillars of brass, fixed on + adamantine rocks, decorated with the most curious efforts of human + ingenuity—where the sacred mantle of public opinion shields them + with impunity—where credulity, planted in the hot-bed of ignorance, + strikes the roots of their authority into the very centre of the earth; + are they, I would ask, the enemies to debauchery, the foes to + intemperance, the haters of those excesses which they insist a severe God + interdicts to his adorers? On the contrary, are they not seen to be + emboldened in crime; intrepid in iniquity; committing the most shameful + atrocities; giving free scope to their irregularities; indulging their + hatred; glutting their vengeance; exercising the most savage cruelties on + the miserable victims to their cowardly suspicion? In short, it may be + safely advanced, without fear of contradiction, that scarcely any thing is + more frequent, than that those men who announce these terrible creeds—who + make men tremble under their yoke—who are unceasingly haranguing + upon the eternity and dreadful nature of their punishments—who + declare themselves the chosen ministers of their oracular laws—who + make all the duties of morality centre in themselves; are those whom + superstition least contributes to render virtuous; are men who possess the + least milk of human kindness; the fewest feelings of tenderness; who are + the most intolerant to their neighbours; the most indulgent to themselves; + the most unsociable in their habits; the most licentious in their manners; + the most unforgiving in their disposition. In contemplating their conduct, + we should be tempted to accredit, that they were perfectly undeceived with + respect to the idols whom they serve; that no one was less the dupe to + those menaces which they so solemnly pronounce in their name, than + themselves. In the hands of the priests of almost all countries, their + divinities resembled the head of Medusa, which, without injuring him who + shewed it, petrified all others. The priests are generally the most crafty + of men, and many among them are substantively wicked. + </p> + <p> + Does the idea of these avenging, these remunerating systems, impose upon + some princes of the earth, who found their titles, who rest their power + upon them; who avail themselves of their terrific power to intimidate + their subjects; to make the people, often rendered unhappy by their + caprice, hold them in reverence? Alas! the theological, the supernatural + ideas, adopted by the pride of some sovereigns, have done nothing more + than corrupt politics—than metamorphose, them into an abject + tyranny. The ministers of these idols, always tyrants themselves, or the + cherishers of despots, are unceasingly crying out to monarchs that they + are the images of the Divinity. Do they not inform the credulous multitude + that heaven is willing they should groan under the most cruel bondage; + writhe under the most multifarious injustice; that to suffer is their + inheritance; that their princes have the indubitable right to appropriate + the goods, dispose of the persons, coerce the liberty; command the lives + of their subjects? Do not some of these chiefs of nations, thus poisoned + in the name of deified idols, imagine that every indulgence of their + wayward humour is freely permitted to them? At once competitors, + representatives, and rivals of the celestial powers, do they not, in some + instances, exercise after their example the most arbitrary despotism? Do + they not, in the intoxication into which sacerdotal flattery has plunged + them, think that like their idols, they are not accountable to man for + their actions, that they owe nothing to the rest of mortals, that they are + bound by no bonds but their own unruly will, to their miserable subjects? + </p> + <p> + Then it is evident that it is to theological notions, to the loose + flattery of its ministers, that are to be ascribed the despotism, the + tyrannical injustice, the corruption, the licentiousness of some princes, + and the blindness of those people, to whom in heaven's name they interdict + the love of liberty; who are forbid to labour effectually to their own + happiness; to oppose themselves to violence, however flagrant; to exercise + their natural rights, however conducive to their welfare. These + intoxicated rulers, even while adoring their avenging gods, in the act of + bending others to their worship, do not scruple to outrage them by their + irregularities—by their want of moral virtue. What morality is this, + but that of men who offer themselves as living images, as animated + representatives of the Divinity? Are those monarchs, then, who are + habitually unjust, who wrest without remorse the bread from the hands of a + famished people, to administer to the profligacy of their insatiable + courtiers—to pamper the luxury of the vile instruments of their + enormities, atheists? Are, then, those ambitious conquerors, who not + contented with oppressing their own slaves, carry desolation, spread + misery, deal out death among the subjects of others, atheists? Do we not + witness in some of those potentates who rule over nations by <i>divine + right</i>, (a patent of power, which every usurper claims as his own) + ambitious mortals, whose exterminating fury nothing can arrest; with + hearts perfectly insensible to the sorrows of mankind; with minds without + energy; with souls without virtue; who neglect their most evident duties, + with which they do not even deign to become acquainted; powerful men, who + insolently set themselves above the rules of equity; knaves who make a + sport of honesty? Generally speaking, is there the least sincerity in the + alliances which these rulers form among themselves? Do they ever last + longer than for the season of their convenience? Do we find substantive + virtues adorn those who most abjectly submit themselves to all the follies + of superstition? Do they not tax each other as violators of property—as + faithlessly aggrandizing themselves at the expence of their neighbour; in + fact, do we not see them endeavouring to surprise, anxious to over-reach, + ready to injure each other, without being arrested by the menaces of their + creeds, or at all yielding to the calls of humanity? In general, they are + too haughty to be humane; too inflated with ambition to be virtuous; they + make a code for themselves, which they cannot help violating. Charles the + Fifth used to say, "that being a warrior, it was impossible for him to + have either conscience or religion." His general, the Marquis de Piscaire, + observed, that "nothing was more difficult, than to serve at one and the + same time, the god <i>Mars</i> and <i>Jesus Christ</i>." Indeed, nothing + can be more opposed to the true spirit of Christianity than the profession + of arms; notwithstanding the Christian princes have the most numerous + armies, and are in perpetual hostility with each other: perhaps the clergy + themselves do not hold forth the most peaceable examples of the doctrine + they teach; they sometimes wrangle for tithes, dispute for trifling + enjoyments, quarrel for worldly opinion, with as much determined + obstinacy, with as, much settled rancour, with as little charity, as could + possibly inhabit the bosom of the most unenlightened Pagan, whose + ignorance they despise—whose superstition they rank as the grossest + effort of idolatrous debasement. It might almost admit of doubt whether + they would be quite pleased to see the mild maxims of the Evangelists, the + true Christian meekness, rigidly followed—whether they might not + think the complete working of their own system would clash with their own + immediate interests? Is it a demonstrable axiom that the ministers of the + Christian faith do not think soldiers are beings extremely well calculated + to give efficacy to their doctrine—solidity to their advantages—durability + to their claims? Be this as it may, priests as well as monarchs have + occasionally waged war for the most futile interests; impoverished a + people from the anti-christian motives; wrested from each other with all + the venom of furies, the bloody remnant of the nations they have laid + waste; in fact, to judge by their conduct on certain occasions, it might + have been a question if they were not disputing who should have the credit + of making the greater number of miserable beings upon earth. At length, + either wearied with their own fury, exhausted by their own devouring + passions, or compelled by the stern hand of necessity, they have permitted + suffering humanity to take breath; they have allowed the miseries + concomitant on war, to cease for an instant their devastating havoc; they + have made peace in the name of that God, whose decrees, as attested by + themselves, they have been so wantonly outraging,—still ready, + however, to violate their most solemn pledges, when the smallest interest + could offer them a pretext. + </p> + <p> + Thus it will be obvious, in what manner the idea of the Divinity operates + on the priest, as well as upon those who are called his images; who insist + they have no account to render but to him alone. Among these + representatives of the Divine Majesty, it is with difficulty during + thousands of years we find some few who have equity, sensibility, virtue, + or even the most ordinary talent. History points out some of these + vicegerents of the Deity, who in the exacerbation of their delirious rage, + have insisted upon displacing him, by exalting themselves into gods; and + exacting the most obsequious worship; who have inflicted the most cruel + torments on those who have opposed themselves to their madness, and + refused to acknowledge the Divinity of their persons. These men, whose + licentiousness knew no limits, from the impunity which attended their + actions, notwithstanding they had learned to despise public opinion, to + set decency at defiance, to indulge in the most shameless vice: in spite + of the power they possessed; of the homage they received; of the terror + they inspired: although they had learned to counterfeit, with great + effect, the whole catalogue of human virtues; found it impossible, even + with the addition of their enormous wealth, wrenched from the necessities + of laborious honesty, to counterfeit the animating blush, which modest + merit brings forth, when eulogized by some happy being whose felicity he + has occasioned, by following the great law of nature—which says, "<i>love + thy neighbour as thyself</i>." On the contrary, we see them grow listless + with satiety; disgusted with their own inordinate indulgences; obliged to + recur to strange pleasures, to awaken their benumbed faculties; to run + headlong into the most costly follies, in the fruitless attempt to keep up + the activity of their souls, the spring of which they had for ever + relaxed, by the profligacy of their enjoyment. + </p> + <p> + History, although it describes a multitude of vicious rulers, whose + irregular propensities were of the most mischievous consequence to the + human race, nevertheless, shews us but few who have been atheists. The + annals of nations, on the contrary, offer to our view great numbers of + superstitious princes, governed by their mistresses, led by unworthy + favorites, leagued with priests, who passed their lives plunged in luxury; + indulging the most effeminate pursuits; following the most childish + pleasures; pleased with ostentatious show; slaves even to the fashion of + the vestments that covered them; but strangers to every manly virtue; + insensible to the sorrows of their subjects; although uniformly good to + their hungry courtiers, invariably kind to those cringing sycophants who + surrounded their persons, and poisoned their ears with the most fulsome + flattery: in short, superstitious persecutors, who, to render themselves + acceptable to their priests, to expiate their own shameful irregularities, + added to all their other vices that of tyrannizing over the mind, of + fettering the conscience, of destroying their subjects for their opinions, + when they were in hostility with their own received doctrines. Indeed, + superstition in princes frequently allied itself with the most horrid + crimes; they have almost all professed religion, although very few of them + have had a just knowledge of morality—have practiced any useful + substantive virtue. Superstitious notions, on the contrary, often serve to + render them more blind, to augment their evil inclinations; to set them at + a greater distance from moral goodness. They for the most part believe + themselves assured of the favor of heaven; they think they faithfully + serve their gods, that the anger of their divinities is appeased, if for a + short season they shew themselves attached to futile customs—lend + themselves to absurd rites—perform some ridiculous duties, which + superstition imposes on them, with a view to obtain their assistance in + the prosecution of its own plans, very rarely in strict unison with their + immediate interest. Nero, the cruel, sanguinary, matricidal Nero, his + hands yet reeking with the blood of that unfortunate being who had borne + him in her womb, who had, with agonizing pains, given the monster to the + world that plunged the dagger in her heart, was desirous to be initiated + into the <i>Eleusinian Mysteries</i>. The odious Constantine himself, + found in the priests, accomplices disposed to expiate his crimes. The + infamous Philip, whose ungovernable ambition caused him to be called the + daemon of the south, whilst he assassinated his wife and son, caused the + throats of the wretched Batavians to be cut for their religious opinions. + It is thus, that the priests of superstition sometimes persuade sovereigns + they can atone for crimes, by committing others of a more atrocious kind—of + an increased magnitude. + </p> + <p> + It would be fair to conclude, from the conduct of so many princes, who had + so much superstition, but so slender a portion of virtue, that the notion + of their gods, far from being useful to them, only served to render them + wore corrupt—to make them more abominable than they already were; + that the idea of an avenging power, placed in the perspective of futurity, + imposed but little restraint on the turbulence of deified tyrants, who + were sufficiently powerful not to fear the reproaches of their subjects—who + had the insensibility to be deaf to the censure of their fellows—who + were gifted with an obduracy of soul, that prevented their having + compassion for the miseries of mankind, from whom they fancied themselves + so pre-eminently distinguished; which, in fact, they were, if crime can be + allowed for the standard of distinction. Neither heaven nor earth + furnishes a balsam of sufficient efficacy to heal the inveterate wounds of + beings cankered to this degree: for such chronic diseases, there is "no + balm in Gilead:" there is no curb sufficiently coercive to rein in the + passions, to which superstition itself gives activity; which only makes + them more unruly; renders them more inveterately rash. Whenever men + flatter themselves with easily expiating their sins—when they soothe + themselves with the consolitary idea of appeasing the anger of the gods by + a show of earnestness, they then deliver themselves up, with the most + unrestrained freedom, to the bent of their criminal pursuits. The most + dissolute men are frequently in appearance extremely attached to + superstition: it furnishes them with a means of compensating by + ceremonies, that of which they are deficient in morals: it is much easier + for them to adopt a faith, to believe in a doctrine, to conform themselves + to certain rituals, than to renounce their habits, resist their passions, + or relinquish the pursuit of that pleasure, which results to unprincipled + minds from the prosecution of the most diabolical schemes. + </p> + <p> + Under chiefs, depraved even by superstition, nations continued necessarily + to be corrupted. The great conformed themselves to the vices of their + masters; the example of these distinguished men, whom the uninformed + erroneously believe to be happy, was followed by the people; courts thus + became the sinks from whence issued the epidemic contagion of licentious + indulgence. The law only held forth pictures of honesty; the dispensers of + jurisprudence were partial, partook of the mania of the times, were + labouring under the general disease; Justice suffered her balance to rust, + occasionally removed her bandage, although she always wore it in the + presence of the poor; genuine ideas of equity had grown into disuse; + distinct notions of right and wrong became troublesome and unfashionable; + education was neglected; it served only to produce prejudiced beings, + grounded in ignorance—devotees, always ready to injure themselves—fanatics, + eager to shew their zeal ever willing to annoy their unfortunate + neighbours. Superstition, sustained by tyranny, ousted every other + feeling, hoodwinked its destined victims, rendered those tractable whom it + had the intention to despoil. Whoever doubts of these truisms, has only to + turn over the pages of history, he will find myriads of evidence to much + more than is here stated. Machiavel, in his <i>Political Discourses upon + Titus Livius</i>, labours the point hard, to shew the utility of + superstition to the Roman Republic: unfortunately, however, the examples + he brings forward in its support, incontestibly prove that none but the + senate profited by the infatuation of the people, who availed itself of + their blindness more effectually to bend them to its yoke. + </p> + <p> + Thus it was that nations, destitute of equitable laws, deficient in the + administration of justice, submitted to irrational government, continued + in slavery by the monarch, chained up in ignorance by the priest, for want + of enlightened institutions, deprived of reasonable education, became + corrupt, superstitious, and flagitious. The nature of man, the just + interests of society, the real advantage of the sovereign, the true + happiness of the people, once mistaken, were completely lost sight of; the + morality of nature, founded upon the essence of man living in society, was + equally unknown; lay buried under an enormous load of prejudice, that no + common efforts were competent to remove. It was entirely forgotten that + man has wants; that society was formed that he might, with greater + security, facilitate the means of satisfying them; that government, to be + legitimate, ought to have for object, the happiness—for end, the + means of maintaining the indivisibility of the community; that + consequently it ought to give activity to springs, full play to motives + suitable to have a favorable influence over sensible beings. It was quite + overlooked, that virtue faithfully rewarded, vice as regularly visited, + had an elastic force, of which the public authorities could efficaciously + avail themselves, to determine their citizens to blend their interests; to + work out their own felicity, by labouring to the happiness of the body of + which they were members. The social virtues were unknown, the <i>amor + patriae</i> became a chimera. Men thus associated, thus blinded by their + superstitious bias, credulously believed their own immediate interest + consisted in injuring each other; they were solely occupied with meriting + the favor of those men, who fatally accreditted the doctrine of clerical + flatterers, of silver-toned courtiers, which taught that they wore + distinctly interested in injuring the whole. + </p> + <p> + This is the mode in which the human heart has become perverted; here is + the genuine source of moral evil; the hot-bed of that epidemical + depravity, the cause of that hereditary corruption, the fountain of that + inveterate delinquency, which pervaded the earth; rendering the abundance + of nature nothing better than a curse; blasting the fairest prospects of + humanity; degrading man below the beast of the forest; sinking his + intellectual faculties in the most savage barbarity; rendering him the + vile instrument of lawless ambition; the wretched tool by which the + fetters of his species were firmly rivetted; obliging him to moisten his + harvest with the bitter tears of the most abject slavery. For the purpose + of remedying so many crying evils, grown insupportable, recourse was had + to new superstitions. Notwithstanding this alone had produced them, it was + still imagined, that the menaces of heaven would restrain passions which + every thing conspired to rouse in all hearts; fatuity persuaded monarchs + that ideal, metaphysical barriers, terrible fables, distant phantoms, + would be competent to curb those inordinate desires, to rein in that + impetuous propensity to crime, that rendered society incommodious to + itself; credulity fancied that invisible powers would be more efficacious, + than those visible motives that evidently invited mortals to the + commission of mischief. Every thing was understood to be achieved, by + occupying man's mind with gloomy chimeras, with vague, undefinable + terrors, with avenging angels; and politics madly believed that its own + interests grew out of the blind submission of its subjects, to the + ministers of these delusive doctrines. + </p> + <p> + What was the result? Nations had only sacerdotal laws; theological + morality; accommodated to the interests of the hierarchy—suitable to + the views of subtle priests: who substituted reveries for realities, + opinions for reason, rank fallacies for sterling truths; who made + ceremonies supply the place of virtue; a pious blindness supersede the + necessity of an enlightened understanding; undermined the sacredness of + oaths, and placed fanaticism on the altars of sociability. By a necessary + consequence of that confidence which the people were compelled to give to + the ministers of superstition, two distinct authorities were established + in each state, who were substantially at variance, in continual hostility + with each other. The priest fought the sovereign with the formidable + weapon of opinion; it generally proved sufficiently powerful to shake the + most established thrones. Thus, although the hierarchy was unceasingly + admonishing the people to submit themselves to the divine authority of + their sovereigns, because it was derived immediately from heaven, yet, + whenever it so happened that the monarch did not repay their advocacy, by + blindly yielding his own authority to the supervisance of the priests, + these made no scruple of threatening him with loss of his temporalities; + fulminated their anathemas, interdicted his dominions, and sometimes went + the length of absolving his subjects from allegiance. Superstition, in + general, only upholds despotism, that it may with greater certainty direct + its blows against its enemies; it overthrows it whenever it is found to + clash with its interests. The ministers of invisible powers preach up + obedience to visible powers, only when they find these humbly devoted to + themselves. Thus the sovereign was never at rest, but when abjectly + cringing to his priest, he tractably received his lessons—lent + himself to his frantic zeal—and piously enabled him to carry on the + furious occupation of proselytism. These priests, always restless, full of + ambition, burning with intolerance, frequently excited the sovereign to + ravage his own states—encouraged him to tyranny: when, pursuing this + sacerdotal mania, he feared to have outraged humanity, to have incurred + the displeasure of heaven, he was quickly reconciled to himself, upon + promise of undertaking some distant expedition, for the purpose of + bringing some unfortunate nation within the pale of their own particular + creed. When the two rival powers united themselves, morality gained + nothing by the junction; the people were neither more happy, nor more + virtuous; their morals, their welfare, their liberty, were equally + overwhelmed by the combined powers. Thus, superstitious princes always + felt interested in the maintenance of theological opinions, which were + rendered flattering to their vanity, favorable to their power. Like the + grateful perfumes of Arabia, that are used to cover the ill scent of a + deadly poison, the priest lulled them into security by administering to + their sensualities; these, in return, made common cause with him: fully + persuaded that the superstition which they themselves adopted, must be the + most wholesome for their subjects, most conducive to their interests, + those who refused to receive the boon, thus gratuitously forced upon them, + were treated as enemies, held up to public scorn, and rendered the victims + of punishment. The most superstitious sovereign became, either politically + or through piety, the executioner of one part of his slaves; he was taught + to believe it a sacred duty to tyrannize over the mind—to overwhelm + the refractory—to crush the enemy of his priest, under an idea that + he was therefore hostile to his own authority. In cutting the throats of + these unfortunate sceptics, he imagined he at once discharged his + obligations to heaven, and gave security to his own power. He did, not + perceive, that by immolating victims to his priest, he in fact + strengthened the arm of his most formidable foe—the real enemy to + his authority—the rival of his greatness—the least subjected + of his subjects. + </p> + <p> + But the prevalence of these false notions, with which both the minds of + the sovereign and the people were prepossessed, it was found that every + thing in society concurred to gratify the avidity, to bolster the pride, + to glut the vengeance of the sacerdotal order: every where, it was to be + observed, that the most turbulent, the most dangerous, the most useless + men, were those who were the most amply rewarded. The strange spectacle + presented itself, of beholding those who were born the bitterest enemies + to sovereign power, cherished by its fostering care—honoured at its + hands: the most rebellious subjects were looked upon as the pillars of the + throne; the corrupters of the people were rendered the exclusive masters + of education; the least laborious of the citizens were richly rewarded for + their idleness—munificently remunerated for the most futile + speculations—held in respect for their fatal discord—gorged + with benefits for their inefficacious prayers: they swept off the fat of + the land for their expiations, so destructive to morals, so calculated to + give permanency to crime. Thus, by a strange fatuity, the viper that + could, and frequently did, inflict the most deadly sting on the bosom of + confiding credulity, was pampered and nourished by the unsuspecting hand + of its destined victim. + </p> + <p> + For thousands of years, nations as well as sovereigns were emulously + despoiling themselves to enrich the expounders of superstition; to enable + them to wallow in abundance: they loaded them with honors, decorated them + with titles, invested them with privileges, granted them immunities, for + no other purpose than to make them bad citizens, unruly subjects, + mischievous beings, who revenged upon society the advantages they had + received. What was the fruit that kings and people gathered from their + imprudent kindness? What was the harvest these men yielded to their + labour? Did princes really become more powerful; were nations rendered + more happy; did they grow more flourishing; did men become more rational? + No! Unquestionably, the sovereign lost the greater portion of his + authority; he was the slave of his priest; and when he wished to preserve + the remnant that was left, or to recover some part of what had been + wrested from him, he was obliged to be continually wrestling against the + men his own indulgence, his own weakness, had furnished with means, to set + his authority at defiance: the riches of society were lavished to support + the idleness, maintain the splendour, satiate the luxury of the most + useless, the most arrogant, the most dangerous of its members. + </p> + <p> + Did the morals of the people improve under the pastoral care of these + guides, who were so liberally rewarded? Alas! the superstitious never knew + them, their fanatic creed had usurped the place of every virtue; its + ministers, satisfied with upholding the doctrines, with preserving the + ceremonies so useful to their own interests, only invented fictitious + crimes—multiplied painful penances—instituted absurd customs; + to the end, that they might turn even the transgressions of their slaves + to their own immediate profit. Every where they exercised a monopoly of + expiatory indulgences; they made a lucrative traffic of pretended pardons + from above; they established a tariff, according to which crime was no + longer contraband, but freely admitted upon paying the customs. Those + subjected to the heaviest impost, were always such as the hierarchy judged + most inimical to its own stability; you might at a very easy rate obtain + permission to attack the dignity of the sovereign, to undermine the + temporal power, but it was enormously dear to be allowed to touch even the + hem of the sacerdotal garments. Thus heresy, sacrilege, &c. were + considered crimes of a much deeper dye, that fixed an indelible stain on + the perpetrator, alarmed the mind of the priestly order, much more + seriously than the most inveterate villainy, the most determined + delinquency, which more immediately involved the true interests of + society. Thence the ideas of the people were completely overturned, + imaginary crimes terrified them, while real crimes had no effect upon + their obdurate hearts. A man, whose opinions were at variance with the + received doctrines, whose abstract systems did not harmonize with those of + his priest, was more loathed than a corrupter of youth; more abhorred than + an assassin; more hated than an oppressor; was held in greater contempt + than a robber; was punished with greater rigor than the seducer of + innocence. The acme of all wickedness, was to despise that which the + priest was desirous should be looked upon as sacred. The celebrated Gordon + says, "the most abominable of heresies, is to believe there is any other + god than the clergy." The civil laws concurred to aid this confusion of + ideas; they inflicted the most serious penalties, punished in the most + atrocious manner those unknown crimes which imagination had magnified into + the most flagitious actions; heretics, infidels, were brought to the + stake, and publicly burnt with the utmost refinement of cruelty; the brain + was tortured to find means of augmenting the sufferings of the unhappy + victims to sacerdotal fury; whilst calumniators of innocence, adulterers, + depredators of every description, knaves of all kinds, were at a trifling + cost absolved from their past iniquity, and opened a new account of future + delinquency. + </p> + <p> + Under such instructors what could become of youth? The period of + juvenility was shamefully sacrificed to superstition. Man, from his + earliest infancy, was poisoned with unintelligible notions; fed with + mysteries; crammed with fables; drenched with doctrines, in which he was + compelled to acquiesce without being able to comprehend. His brain was + disturbed with phantoms, alarmed with chimeras, rendered frantic by + visions. His genius was cramped with puerile pursuits, mechanical + devotions, sacred trifles. Superstition at length so fascinated the human + mind, made such mere automata of mankind, that the people consented to + address their gods in a dialect they did not themselves understand: women + occupied their whole lives in singing Latin, without comprehending a word + of the language; the people assisted very punctually, without being + competent to explain any part of the worship, under an idea that it was + taken kindly they should thus weary themselves; that it was sufficient to + shew their persons in the sacred temples, which were beautifully decorated + to fascinate their senses. Thus man wasted his most precious moments in + absurd customs; spent his life in idle ceremonies; his bead was crowded + with sophisms, his mind was loaded with errors; intoxicated with + fanaticism, he was the declared enemy to reason; for ever prepossessed + against truth, the energy of his soul was resisted by shackles too + ponderous for its elasticity; the spring gave way, and he sunk into sloth + and wretchedness: from this humiliating state he could never again soar; + he could no longer become useful either to himself or to his associates: + the importance he attached to his imaginary science, or rather the + systematic ignorance which served for its basis, rendered it impossible + for the most fertile soil to produce any thing but thorns; for the best + proportioned tree to yield any thing but crabs. + </p> + <p> + Does a superstitious, sacerdotal education, form intrepid citizens, + intelligent fathers of families, kind husbands, just masters, faithful + servants, loyal subjects, pacific associates? No! it either makes peevish + enthusiasts or morose devotees, who are incommodious to themselves, + vexatious to others: men without principle, who quickly pour the waters of + Lethe over the terrors with which they have been disturbed; who know no + moral obligation, who respect no virtue. Thus superstition, elevated above + every thing else, held forth the fanatical dogma, "Better to obey the gods + than men;" in consequence, man believed he must revolt against his prince, + detach himself from his wife, detest his children, estrange himself from + his friends, cut the throats of his fellow-citizens, every time they + questioned the veracity of his faith: in short, a superstitious education, + when it had its effect, only served to corrupt the juvenile heart—to + fascinate youthful winds with its pageantry—to degrade the human + soul—to make man mistake the duties he owed to himself, his + obligations to society, his relations with the beings by whom he was + surrounded. + </p> + <p> + What advantages might not nations have reaped, if they would have employed + on useful objects, those riches, which ignorance has so shamefully + lavished on the expounders of superstition; which fatuity has bestowed on + the most useless ceremonies? What might not have been the progress of + genius, if it had enjoyed those ample remunerations, granted during so + many ages to those priests who at all times opposed its elevation? What + perfection might not science have attained, what height might not the arts + have reached, if they had had the same succours that were held forth with + a prodigal hand to enthusiasm and futility? Upon what rocks might not + morality have been rested, what solid foundations might not politics have + found, with what majestic grandeur might not truth have illumined the + human horizon, if they had experienced the same fostering cares, the same + animating countenance, the same public sanction, which accompanied + imposture—which was showered upon fanaticism—which shielded + falsehood from the rude attack of investigation—which gave impunity + to its ministers? + </p> + <p> + It is then obvious, that superstitious, theological notions, have not + produced any of those solid advantages that have been held forth; if may + be doubted whether they were not always, and ever will remain, contrary to + healthy politics, opposed to sound morality; they frequently change + sovereigns into restless, jealous, mischievous, divinities; they transform + their subjects into envious, wicked slaves, who by idle pageantry, by + futile ceremonies, by an exterior acquiescence in unintelligible opinions, + imagine themselves amply compensated for the evil they commit against each + other. Those who have never had the confidence to examine these sublimated + opinions; those who feel persuaded that their duties spring out of these + abstruse doctrines; those who are actually commanded to live in peace, to + cherish each other, to lend mutual assistance, to abstain from evil, and + to do good, presently lose sight of these sterile speculations, as soon as + present interests, ungovernable passions, inveterate habits, or + irresistible whims, hurry them away. Where are we to look for that equity, + that union of interest, that peace, that concord, which these unsettled + notions, supported by superstition, backed with the full force of + authority, promise to the societies placed under their surveillance? Under + the influence of corrupt courts, of time-serving priests, who, either + impostors or fanatics, are never in harmony with each other, are only to + be discerned vicious men, degraded by ignorance—enslaved by criminal + habits—swayed by transient interests—guided by shameful + pleasures—sunk in a vortex of dissipation; who do not even think of + the Divinity. In despite of his theological ideas, the subtle courtier + continues to weave his dark plots, labours to gratify his ambition, seeks + to satisfy his avidity, to indulge his hatred, to wreak his vengeance, to + give full swing to all the passions inherent to the perversity of his + being: maugre that frightful hell, of which the idea alone makes her + tremble, the woman of intrigue persists in her amours; continues her + harlotry, revels in her adulteries. Notwithstanding their dissipated + conduct, their dissolute manners, their entire want of moral principle, + the greater part of those who swarm in courts, who crowd in cities, would + recoil with horror, if the smallest doubt was exhibited of the truth of + that creed which they outrage every moment, of their lives. What + advantage, then, has resulted to the human race from those opinions, so + universal, at the same time so barren? They seem rarely to have had any + other kind of influence than to serve as a pretext for the most dangerous + passions—as a mantle of security for the most criminal indulgences. + Does not the superstitious despot, who would scruple to omit the least + part of the ceremonies of his persuasion, on quitting the altars at which + he has been sacrificing, on leaving the temple where they have been + delivering the oracles and terrifying crime in the name of heaven, return + to his vices, reiterate his injustice, increase his political crimes, + augment his transgressions against society? Issuing from the sacred fane, + their ears still ringing with the doctrines they have heard, the minister + returns to his vexations, the courtier to his intrigues, the courtezan to + her prostitution, the publican to his extortions, the merchant to his + frauds, the trader to his tricks. + </p> + <p> + Will it be pretended that those cowardly assassins, those dastardly + robbers, those miserable criminals, whom evil institutions, the negligence + of government, the laxity of morals, continually multiply; from whom the + laws, in many instances too sanguinary, frequently wrest their existence; + will it, I say, be pretended that the malefactors who regularly furnish + the gibbets, who daily crowd the scaffolds, are either incredulous or + atheists? No! Unquestionably, these unfortunate beings, these wretched + outcasts, these children of turpitude, firmly believe in God; his name has + been repeated to them from their infancy; they have been informed of the + punishment destined for sinners: they have been habituated in early life + to tremble at his judgments; nevertheless they have outraged society; + their unruly passions, stronger than their fears, not having been coerced + by visible motives, have not, for much more cogent reasons, been + restrained by those which are invisible: distant, concealed punishments + will never be competent to arrest those excesses which present and assured + torments are incapable of preventing. + </p> + <p> + In short, does not every day's experience furnish us the lesson, that men, + persuaded that an all-seeing Deity views them, hears them, encompasses + them, do not on that account arrest their progress when the furor exists, + either for gratifying their licentious passions, or committing the most + dishonest actions? The same individual who would fear the inspection of + the meanest of his fellows, whom the presence of another man would prevent + from committing a bad action, from delivering himself up to some + scandalous vice, freely sins, cheerfully lends himself to crime, when he + believes no eyes beholds him but those of his God. What purpose, then, + does the conviction of the omniscience, the ubiquity, the omnipotence of + the Divinity answer, if it imposes much less on the conduct of the human + being, than the idea of being overlooked by the least of his fellow men? + He who would not have the temerity to commit a crime, even in the presence + of a child, will make no scruple of boldly committing it, when he shall + have only his God for a witness. These facts, which are indubitable, ill + serve for a reply to those who insist that the fear of God is more + suitable to restrain the actions of men, than wholesome laws, with strict + discipline. When man believes he has only his God to dread, he commonly + permits nothing to interrupt his course. + </p> + <p> + Those persons who do not in the least suspect the power of superstitious + notions, who have the most perfect reliance on their efficacy, very + rarely, however, employ them, when they are desirous to influence the + conduct of those who are subordinate to them; when they are disposed to + re-conduct them to the paths of reason. In the advice which a father gives + to his vicious, criminal son, he rather represents to him the present + temporal inconveniencies to which his conduct exposes him, than the danger + he encounters in offending an avenging God; he points out to him the + natural consequences of his irregularities, his health damaged by + debaucheries; the loss of his reputation by criminal pursuits; the ruin of + his fortune by gambling; the punishments of society, &c. Thus the + DEICOLIST himself, on the most important occasions of life, reckons more + stedfastly upon the force of natural motives, than upon those supernatural + inducements furnished by superstition: the same man, who vilifies the + motives that an atheist can have to do good and abstain from evil, makes + use of them himself on this occasion, because he feels they are the most + substantive he can employ. + </p> + <p> + Almost all men believe in an avenging and remunerating God; yet nearly in + all countries the number of the wicked bears a larger proportion than that + of the good. If the true cause of this general corruption be traced, it + will be more frequently found in the superstitious notions inculcated by + theology, than in those imaginary sources which the various superstitions + have invented to account for human depravity. Man is always corrupt + wherever he is badly governed; wherever superstition deifies the + sovereign, his government becomes unworthy: this perverted and assured of + impunity, necessarily render his people miserable; misery, when it exceeds + the point of endurance, as necessarily renders them wicked. When the + people are submitted to irrational masters, they are never guided by + reason. If they are blinded by priests, who are either deceived or + impostors, their reason become useless. Tyrants, when combined with + priests, have generally been successful in their efforts to prevent + nations from becoming enlightened—from seeking after truth—from + ameliorating their condition—from perfectioning their morals; and + never has the union smiled upon liberty: the people, unable to resist the + mighty torrent produced by the confluence of two such rivers, have usually + sunk into the most abject slavery. It is only by enlightening the mass of + mankind, by demonstrating truth, that we can promise to render him better; + that we can indulge the hope of making him happy. It is by causing both + sovereigns and subjects to feel their true relations with each other, that + their actual interests will be improved; that their politics will be + perfectioned: it will then be felt and accredited, that the true art of + governing mortals, the sure method of gaining their affections, is not the + art of blinding them, of deceiving them, or of tyrannizing over them. Let + us, then, good humouredly consult reason, avail ourselves of experience, + interrogate nature; we shall, perhaps, find what is requisite to be done, + in order to labour efficaciously to the happiness of the human race. We + shall most assuredly perceive, that error is the true source of the evils + which embitter our existence; that it is in cheering the hearts, in + dissipating those vain phantoms which alarm the ignorant, in laying the + axe to the root of superstition, that we can peaceably seek after truth; + that it is only in the conflagration of this baneful tree, we can ever + expect to light the torch which shall illumine the road to felicity. Then + let man study nature; observe her immutable laws; let him dive into his + own essence; let him cure himself of his prejudices: these means will + conduct him by a gentle declivity to that virtue, without which he must + feel he can never be permanently happy in the world he inhabits. + </p> + <p> + If man could once cease to fear, from that moment he would be truly happy. + Superstition is a domestic enemy which he always carries within himself: + those who will seriously occupy themselves with this formidable phantom, + must be content to endure continual agonies, to live in perpetual + inquietude: if they will neglect the objects most worthy of interesting + them, to run after chimeras, they will commonly pass a melancholy + existence, in groaning, in praying, in sacrificing, in expiating faults, + either real or imaginary, which they believe calculated to offend their + priests; frequently in their irrational fury they will torment themselves, + they will make it a duty to inflict on their own persons the most + barbarous punishments: but society will reap no benefit from these + mournful opinions—from the tortures of these pious irrationals; + because their mind, completely absorbed by their gloomy reveries, their + time dissipated in the most absurd ceremonies, will leave them no + opportunity of being really advantageous to the community of which they + are members. The most superstitions men are commonly misanthropists, quite + useless to the world, and very injurious to themselves: if ever they + display energy, it is only to devise means by which they can increase + their own affliction; to discover new methods to torture their mind; to + find out the most efficacious means to deprive themselves of those objects + which their nature renders desirable. It is common in the world to behold + penitents, who are intimately persuaded that by dint of barbarous + inflictions on their own persons, by means of a lingering suicide, they + shall merit the favor of heaven. Madmen of this species are to be seen + every where; superstition has in all ages, in all places, given birth to + the most cruel extravagances, to the most injurious follies. + </p> + <p> + If, indeed, these irrational devotees only injure themselves, and deprive + society of that assistance which they owe to it, they without doubt do + less mischief than those turbulent, zealous fanatics, who, infuriated with + their superstitious ideas, believe themselves bound to disturb the world, + to commit actual crimes, to sustain the cause of what they denominate the + true faith. It not unfrequently happens that in outraging morality, the + zealous enthusiast supposes he renders himself agreeable to his God. He + makes perfection consist either in tormenting himself, or in rending + asunder, in favour of his fanatical ideas, the most sacred ties that + connect mortals with each other. + </p> + <p> + Let us, then, acknowledge, that the notions of superstition, are not more + suitable to procure the welfare, to establish the content, to confirm the + peace of individuals, than they are of the society of which they are + members. If some peaceable, honest, inconclusive enthusiasts, find either + comfort or consolation in them, there are millions who, more conclusive to + their principles, are unhappy during their whole life; who are perpetually + assailed by the most melancholy ideas; to whom their disordered + imagination shews these notions, as every instant involving them in the + most cruel punishments. Under such formidable systems, a tranquil, + sociable devotee, is a man who has not reasoned upon them. + </p> + <p> + In short, every thing serves to prove, that superstitious opinions have + the strongest influence over men; that they torment them unceasingly, + divide them from their dearest connections, inflame their minds, envenom + their passions, render them miserable without ever restraining their + actions, except when their own temperament proves too feeble to propel + them forward: all this holds forth one great lesson, that <i>superstition + is incompatible with liberty, and can never furnish good citizens</i>. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0011" id="link2H_4_0011"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. IX. + </h2> + <p> + <i>Theological Notions cannot be the Basis of Morality.—Comparison + between Theological Ethics and Natural Morality.—Theology + prejudicial to the human Mind.</i> + </p> + <p> + Felicity is the great end of human existence; a supposition therefore, to + be actually useful to man, should render him happy. By what parity of + reasoning can he flatter himself that an hypothesis, which does not + facilitate his happiness in his present duration, may one day conduct him + to permanent bliss? If mortals only sigh, tremble, and groan in this + world, of which they have a knowledge, upon what foundation is it they + expect a more felicitous existence hereafter, in a world of which they + know nothing? If man is every where the child of calamity, the victim to + necessary evil, the unhappy sufferer under an immutable system, ought he + reasonably to indulge a greater confidence in future happiness? + </p> + <p> + On the other hand, a supposition which should throw light on every thing, + which should supply an easy solution to all the questions to which it + could be applied, when even it should not be competent to demonstrate the + certitude, would probably be true: but that system which should only + obscure the clearest notions, render more insoluble the problems desired + to be resolved by its means, would most assuredly be looked upon as + fallacious; as either useless or dangerous. To be convinced of this + principle, let us examine, without prejudice, if the theological ideas of + the Divinity have ever given the solution to any one difficulty. Has the + human understanding progressed a single step by the assistance of this + metaphysical science? Has it not, on the contrary, had a tendency to + obscure the wore certain science of morals? Has it not, in many instances, + rendered the most essential duties of our nature problematical? Has it not + in a great measure confounded the notions of virtue and vice, of justice + and injustice? Indeed, what is virtue, in the eyes of the generality of + theologians? They will instantly reply, "that which is conformable to the + will of the incomprehensible beings who govern nature." But way it not be + asked, without offence to the individual opinions of any one, what are + these beings, of whom they are unceasingly talking, without having the + capacity to comprehend them? How can we acquire a knowledge of their will? + They will forthwith reply, with a confidence that is meant to strike + conviction on uninformed minds, by recounting what they are not, without + even attempting to inform us what they are. If they do undertake to + furnish an idea of them, they will heap upon their hypothetical beings a + multitude, of contradictory, incompatible attributes, with which they will + form a whole, at once impossible for the human mind to conceive or else + they will refer to oracles, by which they insist their intentions have + been promulgated to mankind. If, however, they are requested to prove the + authenticity of these oracles, which are at such variance with each other, + they will refer to miracles in support of what they assert: these + miracles, independent of the difficulty there must exist to repose in them + our faith, when, as we have seen, they are admitted even by the + theologians themselves, to be contrary to the intelligence, the + immutability, to the omnipotency of their immaterial substances, are, + moreover, warmly disputed by each particular sect, as being impositions, + practised by the others for their own individual advantage. As a last + resource, then, it will be necessary to accredit the integrity, to rely on + the veracity, to rest on the good faith of the priests, who announce these + oracles. On this again, there arises two almost insuperable difficulties, + in the <i>first</i> place, who shall assure us of their actual mission? + are we quite certain none of them may be mistaken? how shall we be + justified in giving credence to their powers? are they not these priests + themselves, who announce to us that they are the infallible interpreters + of a being whom they acknowledge they do not at all know? In the <i>second</i> + place, which set of these oracular developements are we to adopt? For to + give currency to the whole, would, in point of fact, annihilate them + entirely; seeing, that no two of them run in unison with each other. This + granted, the priests, that is to say, men extremely suspicious, but little + in harmony with each other, will be the arbiters of morality; they will + decide (according to their own uncertain knowledge, after their various + passions, in conformity to the different perspectives under which they + view these things,) on the whole system of ethics; upon which absolutely + rests the repose of the world—the sterling happiness of each + individual. Would this be a desirable state? would it be that from which + humanity has the best founded prospect of that felicity, which is the + desired object of his research? Again; do we not see that either + enthusiasm or interest is the only standard of their decisions? that their + morals are as variable as their caprice? those who listen to them, very + rarely discover to what line they will adhere. In their various writings, + we have evidence of the most bitter animosities; we find continual + contradictions; endless disputes upon what they themselves acknowledge to + be the most essential points; upon those premises, in the substantive + proof of which their whole system depends; the very beings they depict as + their source of their various creeds, are pourtrayed as variable as + themselves; as frequently changing their plans as these are their + arguments. What results from all this to a rational man? It will be + natural for him to conclude, that neither inconstant gods, nor vacillating + priests, whose opinions are more fluctuating than the seasons, can be the + proper models of a moral system, which should be as regular, as + determinate, as invariable as the laws of nature herself; as that eternal + march, from which we never see her derogate. + </p> + <p> + No! Arbitrary, inconclusive, contradictory notions, abstract, + unintelligible speculations, can never be the sterling bases of the + ethical science! They must be evident, demonstrable principles, deduced + from the nature of man, founded upon his wants, inspired by rational + education, rendered familiar by habit, made sacred by wholesome laws, that + will flash conviction on our mind, render systems useful to mankind, make + virtue dear to us—that will people nations with honest men—fill + up the ranks with faithful subjects—crowd them with intrepid + citizens. Incomprehensible beings can present nothing to our imagination, + save vague ideas, which will never embrace any common point of union + amongst those who shall contemplate them. If these beings are painted as + terrible, the mind is led astray; if changeable, it always precludes us + from ascertaining the road we ought to pursue. The menaces held forth by + those, who, in despite of their own assertions, say they are acquainted + with the views, with the determination of these beings, will seldom do + more than render virtue unpleasant; fear alone will then make us practise + with reluctance, that which reason, which our own immediate interest, + ought to make us execute with pleasure. The inculcation of terrible ideas + will only serve to disturb honest persons, without in the least arresting + the progress of the profligate, or diverting the course of the flagitious: + the greater number of men, when they shall be disposed to sin, to deliver + themselves up to vicious propensities, will cease to contemplate these + terrific ideas, will only behold a merciful God, who is filled with + goodness, who will pardon the transgressions of their weakness. Man never + views things but on that side which is most conformable to his desires. + </p> + <p> + The goodness of God cheers the wicked; his rigour disturbs the honest man. + Thus, the qualities with which theology clothes its immaterial substances, + themselves turn out disadvantageous to sound morality. It is upon this + infinite goodness that the most corrupt men will have the audacity to + reckon, when they are either hurried along by crime, or given up to + habitual vice. If, then, they are reminded of their criminal courses, they + reply, "God is good, his mercy is infinite, his clemency boundless:" thus + it may be said that religion itself is pressed into the service of vice, + by the children of turpitude. Superstition, above all, rather abets crime + than represses it, by holding forth to mortals that by the assistance of + certain ceremonies, the performance of certain rites, the repetition of + certain prayers, aided by the payment of certain sums of money, they can + appease the anger of their gods, assuage the wrath of heaven, wash out the + stains of their sins, and be received with open arms into the happy number + of the elect—be placed in the blissful abodes of eternity. In short, + do not the priests of superstition universally affirm, that they possess + infallible secrets, for reconciling the most perverse to the pale of their + respective systems? + </p> + <p> + It must be concluded from this, that however these systems are viewed, in + whatever manner they are considered, they cannot serve for the basis of + morality, which in its very nature is formed to be invariably the same. + Irascible systems are only useful to those who find an interest in + terrifying the ignorance of mankind, that they may advantage themselves of + his fears—profit by his expiations. The nobles of the earth, who are + frequently men not gifted with the most exemplary morals—who do not + on all occasions exhibit the most perfect specimens of self-denial—who + would not, perhaps, be at all times held up as mirrors of virtue, will not + see these formidable systems, when they shall be inclined to listen to + their passions; to lend themselves to the indulgence of their unruly + desires: they will, however, feel no repugnance to make use of them to + frighten others, to the end that they may preserve unimpaired their + superiority; that they may keep entire their prerogatives; that they may + more effectually bind them to servitude. Like the rest of mankind, they + will see their God under the traits of his benevolence; they will always + believe him indulgent to those outrages they may commit against their + fellows, provided they shew due respect for him themselves: superstition + will furnish them with easy means to turn aside his Wrath; its ministers + seldom omit a profitable opportunity, to expiate the crimes of human + nature. + </p> + <p> + Morality is not made to follow the caprices of the imagination, the fury + of the passions, the fluctuating interests of men: it ought to possess + stability; to be at all times the same, for all the individuals of the + human race; it ought neither to vary in one country, nor in one race from + another: neither superstition nor religion, has a privilege to make its + immutability subservient to the changeable laws of their systems. There is + but one method to give ethics this solidity; it has been more than once + pointed out in the course of this work: it is only to be founded upon the + nature of man, bottomed upon his duties, rested upon the relations + subsisting between intelligent beings, who are in love, with their + happiness, who are occupied with their own preservation, who live together + in society that they may With greater facility ascertain these ends. In + short we must take for the basis of morality the necessity of things. + </p> + <p> + In weighing these principles, which are self evident, confirmed by + constant experience, approved by reason, drawn from nature herself, we + shall have an undeviating tone of conduct; a sure system of morality, that + will never be in contradiction with itself. Man will have no occasion to + recur to theological speculations to regulate his conduct in the visible + world. We shall then be capacitated to reply to those who pretend that + without them there can be no morality. If we reflect upon the long tissue + of errors, upon the immense chain of wanderings, that flow from the + obscure notions these various systems hold forth—of the sinister + ideas which superstition in all countries inculcates; it would be much + more conformable to truth to say, that all sound ethics, all morality, + either useful to individuals or beneficial to society, is totally + incompatible with systems which never represent their gods but under the + form of absolute monarchs, whose good qualities are continually eclipsed + by dangerous caprices. Consequently, we shall be obliged to acknowledge, + that to establish morality upon a steady foundation, we must necessarily + commence by at least quitting those chimerical systems upon which the + ruinous edifice of supernatural morality has hitherto been constructed, + which during such a number of ages, has been so uselessly preached up to a + great portion of the inhabitants of the earth. + </p> + <p> + Whatever may have been the cause that placed man in his present abode, + that gave him the faculties he possesses; whether the human species be + considered as the work of nature, or whether it be supposed that he owes + his existence to an intelligent being, distinguished from nature; the + existence of man, such as he is, is a fact; we behold in him a being who + thinks, who feels, who has intelligence, who loves himself, who tends to + his own conservation, who in every moment of his duration strives to + render his existence agreeable; who, the more easily to satisfy his wants + and to procure himself pleasure, congregates in society with beings + similar to himself; of whom his conduct can either conciliate the favour, + or draw upon him the disaffection. It is, then, upon these general + sentiments, inherent in his nature, which will subsist as long as his race + shall endure, that we ought to found morality; which is only a science + embracing, the duties of men living together in society. + </p> + <p> + These duties have their spring in our nature, they are founded upon our + necessities, because we cannot reach the goal of happiness, if we do not + employ the requisite means: these means constitute the moral science. To + be permanently felicitous, we must so comport ourselves as to merit the + affection, so act as to secure the assistance of those, beings with whom + we are associated; these will only accord us their love, lend us their + esteem, aid us in our projects, labour to our peculiar happiness, but in + proportion as our own exertions shall be employed for their advantage. It + is this necessity, flowing naturally out of the relations of mankind, that + is called MORAL OBLIGATION. It is founded upon reflection, rested upon + those motives competent to determine sensible, intelligent beings, to + pursue that line of conduct, which in best calculated to achieve that + happiness towards which they are continually verging. These motives in the + human species, never can be other than the desire, always regenerating, of + procuring good and avoiding evil. Pleasure and pain, the hope of + happiness, or the fear of misery, are the only motives suitable to have an + efficacious influence on the volition of sensible beings. To impel them + towards this end, it is sufficient these motives exist and be understood + to have a knowledge of them, it is only requisite to consider our own + constitution: according to this, we shall find we can only love those + actions, approve that conduct, from whence result actual and reciprocal + utility; this constitutes VIRTUE. In consequence, to conserve ourselves, + to make our own happiness, to enjoy security, we are compelled to follow + the routine which conducts to this end; to interest others in our own + preservation, we are obliged to display an interest in theirs; we must do + nothing that can have a tendency to interrupt that mutual co-operation + which alone can lead to the felicity desired. Such is the true + establishment of moral obligation. + </p> + <p> + Whenever it is attempted to give any other basis to morality than the + nature of man, we shall always deceive ourselves; none other can have the + least stability; none can be more solid. Some authors, even of great + integrity, have thought, that to give ethics more respectability in the + eyes of man, to render more inviolable those duties which his nature + imposes on him, it was needful to clothe them with the authority of a + being whom they have made superior to nature—whom they have rendered + more powerful than necessity. Theology, seizing on these ideas, with its + own general want of just inference, has in consequence invaded morality; + has endeavoured to connect it with its various systems. By some it has + been imagined, this union would render virtue more sacred; that the fear + attached to invisible powers, who govern nature, would lend more weight, + would give more efficacy to its laws; in short, it has been believed that + man, persuaded, of the necessity of the moral system, seeing it united + with superstition, would contemplate superstition itself as necessary to + his happiness. Indeed it is the supposition that these systems are + essential to morality, that sustains the theological ideas—that + gives permanency to the greater part of all the creeds on earth; it is + erroneously imagined that without them man would neither understand nor + practise the duties he owes to others. This prejudice once established, + gives currency to the opinion that the vague ideas growing out of these + systems are in such a manner connected with morality, are so linked with + the actual welfare of society, that they cannot be attacked without + overturning the social duties that bind man to his fellow. It is thought + that the reciprocity of wants, the desire of happiness, the evident + interests of the community, would be mere skeleton motives, devoid of all + active energy, if they did not borrow their substance from these various + systems; if they were not invested with the force derived from these + numerous creeds; if they were not clothed with the sanction of those ideas + which have been made the arbiters of all things. + </p> + <p> + Nothing, however, is more borne out by the evidence of experience, nothing + has more thoroughly impressed itself on the minds of reflecting men, than + the danger always arising from connecting truth with fiction; the known + with the unknown; the delirium of enthusiasm, with the tranquillity of + reason. Indeed what has resulted from the confused alliance, from the + marvellous speculations, which theology has made with the most substantive + realities? of mixing up its evanescent conjectures with the confirmed + aphorisms of time? The imagination bewildered, has mistaken truth: + superstition, by aid of its gratuitous suppositions, has commanded nature—made + reason bow, under its bulky yoke,—submitted man to its own peculiar + caprices; very frequently in the name of its gods obliged him to stifle + his nature, to piously violate the most sacred duties of morality. When + these superstitions have been desirous of restraining mortals whom they + had previously hood-winked, whom they had rendered irrational, it gave + them only ideal curbs, imaginary motives; it substituted unsubstantial + causes, for those which were substantive; marvellous supernatural powers, + for those which were natural, and well understood; it supplied actual + realities, by ideal romances and visionary fables. By this inversion of + principle, morality had no longer any fixed basis: nature, reason, virtue, + demonstration, were laid prostrate before the most undefinable systems; + were made to depend upon oracular promulgations, which never spake + distinctly; indeed, they generally silenced reason, were often delivered + by fanatics, which time proved to be impostors; by those who, always + adopting the appellation of inspired beings, gave forth nothing but the + wanderings of their own delirium, or else were desirous of profiting by + the errors which they themselves instilled into mankind. Thus these men + became deeply interested in preaching abject submission, non-resistance, + passive-obedience, factitious virtues, frivolous ceremonies; in short, an + arbitrary morality, conformable to their own reigning passions; frequently + prejudicial to the rest of the human race. + </p> + <p> + It was thus, in making ethics flow from these various systems, they in + point of fact submitted it to the dominant passions of men, who had a + direct interest in moulding it to their own advantage. In being disposed + to found it upon undemonstrated theories, they founded it upon nothing; in + deriving it from imaginary sources, of which each individual forms to + himself his own notion, generally adverse to that of his neighbour; in + resting it upon obscure oracles, always delivered ambiguously, frequently + interpreted by men in the height of delirium, sometimes by knaves, who had + immediate interests to promote, they rendered it unsteady—devoid of + fixed principle,—too frequently left it to the mercy of the most + crafty of mankind. In proposing to man the changeable creeds of the + theologians for a model, they weakened the moral system of human actions; + frequently annihilated that which was furnished by nature; often + substituted in its place nothing but the most perplexing incertitude; the + most ruinous inconsistency. These systems, by the qualities which are + ascribed, to them, become inexplicable enigmas, which each expounds as + best suits himself; which each explains after his own peculiar mode of + thinking; in which the theologian ever finds that which most harmonizes + with his designs; which he can bend to his own sinister purposes; which he + offers as irrefragible evidence of the rectitude of those actions, which + at bottom have nothing but his own advantage in view. If they exhort the + gentle, indulgent, equitable man, to be good, compassionate, benevolent; + they equally excite the furious, who is destitute of these qualities, to + be intolerant, inhuman, pitiless. The morality of these systems varies in + each individual; differs in one country from another; in fact, those + actions which some men look upon as sacred, which they have learned to + consider meritorious, make others shudder with horror—fill them with + the most painful recollections. Some see the Divinity filled with + gentleness and mercy; others behold him as full of wrath and fury, whose + anger is to be assuaged by the commission of the most shocking cruelties. + </p> + <p> + The morality of nature is clear, it is evident even to those who outrage + it. It is not thus with superstitious morality; this is as obscure as the + systems which prescribe it; or rather as fluctuating as the passions, as + changeable as the temperaments, of those who expound them; if it was left + to the theologians, ethics ought to be considered as the science of all + others the most problematical, the most unsteady, the most difficult to + bring to a point; it would require the most profound, penetrating genius, + the most active, vigorous mind, to discover the principles of those duties + man owes to himself, that he ought to exercise towards others; this would + render the sources of the moral system attainable by a very small number + of individuals; would effectually lock them up in the cabinets of the + metaphysicians; place them under the treacherous guardianship of priests: + to derive it from those systems, which are in themselves undefinable, with + the foundations of which no one is actually acquainted, which each + contemplates after his own mode, modifies after his own peculiar ideas, is + at once to submit it to the caprice of every individual; it is completely + to acknowledge, we know not from whence it is derived, nor whence it has + its principles. Whatever may be the agent upon whom they make nature, or + the beings she contains, to depend; with whatever power they way suppose + him invested, it is very certain that man either does, or does not exist; + but as soon as his existence is acknowledged, as soon as it is admitted to + be what it actually is, when he shall be allowed to be a sensible being + living in society, in love with his own felicity, they cannot without + either annihilating him, or new modelling him, cause him to exist + otherwise than he does. Therefore, according to his actual essence, + agreeable to his absolute qualities, conformable to those modifications + which constitute him a being, of the human species, morality becomes + necessary to him, and the desire of conserving himself will make him + prefer virtue to vice, by the same necessity that he prefers pleasure to + pain. If, following up the doctrine of the theologians, "that man hath + occasion for supernatural grace to enable him to do good," it must be very + injurious to sound principles of morality; because he will always wait for + "the call from above," to exercise that virtue, which is indispensable to + his welfare. Tertullian, nevertheless says expressly, "wherefore will ye + trouble yourselves, seeking after the law of God, whilst ye have that + which is common to all the world, and which is written on the tablets of + nature?" + </p> + <p> + To say, that man cannot possess any moral sentiments without embracing the + discordant systems offered to his acceptance, is, in point of fact, + saying, that he cannot distinguish virtue from vice; it is to pretend that + without these systems, man would not feel the necessity of eating to live, + would not make the least distinction, would be absolutely without choice + in his food: it is to pretend, that unless he is fully acquainted with the + name, character, and qualities of the individual who prepares a mess for + him, he is not competent to discriminate whether this mess be agreeable or + disagreeable, good or bad. He who does not feel himself satisfied what + opinions to adopt, upon the foundation and moral attributes of these + systems, or who even formally denies them, cannot at least doubt his own + existence-his own functions—his own qualities—his own mode of + feeling—his own method of judging; neither can he doubt the + existence of other organized beings similar to himself; in whom every + thing discovers to him qualities analogous with his own; of whom he can, + by certain actions, either gain the love or incur the hatred—secure + the assistance or attract the ill-will—merit the esteem or elicit + the contempt; this knowledge is sufficient to enable him to distinguish + moral good and evil. In short, every man enjoying a well-ordered + organization, possessing the faculty of making true experience, will only + need to contemplate himself in order to discover what he owes to others: + his own nature will enlighten him much more effectually upon his duties, + than those systems in which he will consult either his own unruly + passions, those of some enthusiast, or those of an impostor. He will + allow, that to conserve himself, to secure his own permanent welfare, he + is frequently obliged to resist the blind impulse of his own desires; that + to conciliate the benevolence of others, he must act in a mode conformable + to their advantage; in reasoning thus, he will find out what virtue + actually is; if he puts his theory into practice, he will be virtuous; he + will be rewarded for his conduct by the harmony of his own machine; by the + legitimate esteem of himself, confirmed by the good opinion of others, + whose kindness he will have secured: if he acts in a contrary mode, the + trouble that will ensue, the disorder of his frame, will quickly warn him + that nature, thwarted by his actions, disapproves his conduct, which is + injurious to himself; to which he will be obliged to add the condemnation + of others, who will hate him. If the wanderings of his mind prevent him + from seeing the more immediate consequences of his irregularities, neither + will he perceive the distant rewards, the remote punishments, which these + systems hold forth; because they will never speak to him so distinctly as + his conscience, which will either reward or punish him on the spot. + Theology has never yet known how to give a true definition of virtue: + according to it, it is an effort of grace, that disposes man to do that + which is agreeable to the Divinity. But what is this grace? How doth it + act upon man? How shall we know what is agreeable to a Divinity who is + incomprehensible to all men? + </p> + <p> + Every thing that has been advanced evidently proves, that superstitious + morality is an infinite loser when compared with the morality of nature, + with which, indeed, it is found in perpetual contradiction. Nature invites + man to love himself, to preserve his existence, to incessantly augment the + sum of his happiness: superstition teaches him to be in love only with + formidable doctrines, calculated to generate his dislike; to detest + himself; to sacrifice to his idols his most pleasing sensations—the + most legitimate pleasures of his heart. Nature counsels man to consult + reason, to adopt it for his guide; superstition pourtrays this reason as + corrupted, as a treacherous director, that will infallibly lead him + astray. Nature warns him to enlighten his understanding, to search after + truth, to inform himself of his duties; superstition enjoins him not to + examine any thing, to remain in ignorance, to fear truth; it persuades him + there are no relations so important to his interest, as those which + subsist between himself and systems which he can never understand. Nature + tells the being who is in love with his welfare, to moderate his passions, + to resist them when they are found destructive to himself, to counteract + them by substantive motives collected from experience; superstition + desires a sensible being to have no passions, to be an insensible mass, or + else to combat his propensities by motives borrowed from the imagination, + which are as variable as itself. Nature exhorts man to be sociable, to + love his fellow creatures, to be just, peaceable, indulgent, benevolent, + to permit his associates to freely enjoy their opinions; superstition + admonishes him to fly society, to detach himself from his fellow mortals, + to hate them when their imagination does not procure them dreams + conformable to his own; to break through the most sacred bonds, to + maintain his own opinions, or to frustrate those of his neighbour; to + torment, to persecute, to massacre, those who will not be mad after his + own peculiar manner. Nature exacts that man in society should cherish + glory, labour to render himself estimable, endeavour to establish an + imperishable name, to be active, courageous, industrious; superstition + tells him to be abject, pusillanimous, to live in obscurity, to occupy + himself with ceremonies; it says to him, be useless to thyself, and do + nothing for others. Nature proposes to the citizen, for his model, men + endued with honest, noble, energetic souls, who have usefully served their + fellow citizens; superstition recommends to his imitation mean, cringing + sycophants; extols pious enthusiasts, frantic penitents, zealous fanatics, + who for the most ridiculous opinions have disturbed the tranquility of + empires. Nature urges the husband to be tender, to attach himself to the + company of his mate, to cherish her in his bosom; superstition makes a + crime of his susceptibility, frequently obliges him to look upon the + conjugal bonds as a state of pollution, as the offspring of imperfection. + Nature calls to the father to nurture his children, to cherish their + affection, to make them useful members of society; superstition advises + him to rear them in fear of its systems, to hoodwink them, to make them + superstitious, which renders them incapable of actually serving society, + but extremely well calculated to disturb its repose. Nature cries out to + children to honor their parents, to listen to their admonitions, to be the + support of their old age; superstition says, prefer the oracles; in + support of the systems of which you are an admitted member, trample father + and mother under your feet. Nature holds out to the philosopher that he + should occupy himself with useful objects, consecrate his cares to his + country, make advantageous discoveries, suitable to perfect the condition + of mankind; superstition saith, occupy thyself with useless reveries; + employ thy time in endless dispute; scatter about with a lavish hand the + seeds of discord, calculated to induce the carnage of thy fellows; + obstinately maintain opinions which thou thyself canst never understand. + Nature points out to the perverse man, that he should blush for his vices, + that he should feel sorrow for his disgraceful propensities, that he + should be ashamed of crime; it shews him, that his most secret + irregularities will necessarily have an influence over his own felicity; + superstition crieth to the most corrupt men, to the most flagitious + mortals, "do not irritate the gods, whom thou knowest not; but if, + peradventure, against their express command, thou dost deliver thyself up + to crime, remember that their mercy is infinite, that their compassion + endureth for ever, that therefore they may be easily appeased; thou hast + nothing more to do than to go into their temples, prostrate thyself before + their altars, humiliate thyself at the feet of their ministers; expiate + thy transgressions by largesses, by sacrifices, by offerings, by + ceremonies, and by prayer; these things done with a willing spirit, and a + contrite heart, will pacify thine own conscience, and cleanse thee in the + eyes of heaven." + </p> + <p> + The rights of the citizen, or the man in society, are not less injured by + superstition, which is always in contradiction with sound politics. Nature + says distinctly to man, "thou art free; no power on earth can justly + deprive thee of thy rights, without thine own consent; and even then, thou + canst not legitimately make thyself a slave to thy like." Superstition + tells him he is a slave, condemned to groan all his life under the iron + rod of the representatives of its system. Nature commands man to love the + country which gave him birth, to serve it faithfully, to blend his + interests with it, to unite against all those who shall attempt to injure + it; superstition generally orders him to obey without murmur the tyrants + who oppress it, to serve them against its best interests, to merit their + favors by contributing to enslave their fellow citizens to their + ungovernable caprices: notwithstanding these general orders, if the + sovereign be not sufficiently devoted to the priest, superstition quickly + changes its language, it then calls upon subjects to become rebels; it + makes it a duty in them to resist their masters; it cries out to them, "it + is better to obey the gods than men." Nature acquaints princes that they + are men: that it is not by their capricious whims that they can decide + what is just; that it is not their wayward humours that can mark what is + unjust; that the public will maketh the law. Superstition often insinuates + to them that they are gods, to whom nothing in this world ought to offer + resistance; sometimes, indeed, it transforms them into tyrants, whom + enraged heaven is desirous should be immolated to its wrath. + </p> + <p> + Superstition corrupts princes; these corrupt the law, which, like + themselves, becomes unjust; from thence institutions are perverted; + education only forms men who are worthless, blinded with prejudice, + smitten with vain objects, enamoured of wealth, devoted to pleasures, + which they must obtain by iniquitous means: thus nature, mistaken, is + disdained; virtue is only a shadow quickly sacrificed to the slightest + interest, while superstition, far from remedying these evils to which it + has given birth, does nothing more than render them still more inveterate; + or else engenders sterile regrets which it presently effaces: thus, by its + operation, man is obliged to yield to the force of habit, to the general + example, to the stream of those propensities, to those causes of + confusion, which conspire to hurry all his species, who are not willing to + renounce their own welfare, on to the commission of crime. + </p> + <p> + Here is the mode by which superstition, united with politics, exert their + efforts to pervert, abuse, and poison the heart of man; the generality of + human institutions appear to have only for their object to abase the human + character, to render it more flagitiously wicked. Do not then let us be at + all astonished if morality is almost every where a barren speculation, + from which every one is obliged to deviate in practice, if he will not + risk the rendering himself unhappy. Men can only have sound morals, when, + renouncing his prejudices, he consults his nature; but the continued + impulse which his soul is every moment receiving, on the part of more + powerful motives, quickly compels him to forget those ethical rules which + nature points out to him. He is continually floating between vice and + virtue; we behold him unceasingly in contradiction with himself; if, + sometimes, he justly appreciates the value of an honest, upright conduct, + experience very soon shews him, that this cannot lead him to any thing, + which he has been taught to desire, on the contrary, that it may be an + invincible obstacle to the happiness which his heart never ceases for an + instant to search after. In corrupt societies it is necessary to become + corrupt, in order to become happy. + </p> + <p> + Citizens, led astray at the same time both by their spiritual and temporal + guides, neither knew reason nor virtue. The slaves both of their + superstitious systems, and of men like themselves, they had all the vices + attached to slavery; kept in a perpetual state of infancy, they had + neither knowledge nor principles; those who preached virtue to them, knew + nothing of it themselves, and could not undeceive them with respect to + those baubles in which they had learned to make their happiness consist. + In vain they cried out to them to stifle those passions which every thing + conspired to unloose: in vain they made the thunder of the gods roll to + intimidate men whose tumultuous passions rendered them deaf. It was soon + discovered that the gods of the heavens were much less feared than those + of the earth; that the favour of the latter procured a much more + substantive welfare than the promises of the former; that the riches of + this world were more tangible than the treasures reserved for favorites in + the next; that it was much more advantageous for men to conform themselves + to the views of visible powers than to those of powers who were not within + the compass of their visual faculties. + </p> + <p> + Thus society, corrupted by its priests, guided by their caprice, could + only bring forth a corrupt offspring. It gave birth to avaricious, + ambitious, jealous, dissolute citizens, who never saw any thing happy but + crime; who beheld meanness rewarded; incapacity honoured; wealth adored; + debauchery held in esteem; who almost every where found talents + discouraged; virtue neglected; truth proscribed; elevation of soul + crushed; justice trodden under foot; moderation languishing in misery; + liberality of mind obligated to groan under the ponderous bulk of haughty + injustice. + </p> + <p> + In the midst of this disorder, in this confusion of ideas, the precepts of + morality could only be vague declamations, incapable of convincing any + one. What barrier could superstition, with its imaginary motives, oppose + to the general corruption? When it spake reason, it could not be heard; + its gods themselves were not sufficiently powerful to resist the torrent; + its menaces failed of effect, on those hearts which every thing hurried + along to crime; its distant promises could not counterbalance present + advantages; its expiations, always ready to cleanse mortals from their + sins, emboldened them to persevere in their criminal pursuits; its + frivolous ceremonies calmed their consciences; its zeal, its disputes, its + caprices, only multiplied the evils, with which society found itself + afflicted; only gave them an inveteracy that rendered them more widely + mischievous; in short, in the most vitiated nations there was a multitude + of devotees, and but very few honest men. Great and small listened to the + doctrines of superstition, when they appeared favorable to their dominant + passions; when they were desirous to counteract them, they listened no + longer. Whenever superstition was conformable to morality, it appeared + incommodious, it was only followed when it either combatted ethics or + destroyed them. The despot himself found it marvellous, when it assured + him he was a god upon earth; that his subjects were born to adore him + alone, to administer to his phantasms. He neglected it when it told him to + be just; from thence he saw it was in contradiction with itself, that it + was useless to preach equity to a deified mortal; besides, he was assured + the gods would pardon every thing, as soon as he should consent to recur + to his priests, always ready to reconcile them; the most wicked of their + subjects reckoned in the same manner upon their divine assistance: thus + superstition, far from restraining vice, assured its impunity; its menaces + could not destroy the effects which its unworthy flattery had produced in + princes; these same menaces could not annihilate the hope which its + expiations had furnished to all. Sovereigns, either inflated with pride, + or always confident of washing out their crimes by timely sacrifices, no + longer actually feared their gods; become gods themselves, they believed + they were permitted any thing against poor pitiful mortals, whom they no + longer considered under any other light than as playthings destined for + their earthly amusement. + </p> + <p> + If the nature of man was consulted in his politics which supernatural + ideas have so woefully depraved, it would completely rectify those false + notions that are entertained equally by sovereigns and by subjects; it + would contribute more amply than all the superstitions existing, to render + society happy, powerful, and flourishing under rational authority. Nature + would teach man, it is for the purpose of enjoying a greater portion of + happiness, that mortals live together in society; that it is its own + preservation, its own immediate felicity, that society should have for its + determinate, unchangeable object: that without equity, a nation only + resembles a congregation of enemies; that his most cruel foe, is the man + who deceives him in order that he may enslave him; that the scourges most + to be feared, are those priests who corrupt his chiefs, who, in the name + of the gods assure them of impunity for their crimes: she would prove to + him that association is a misfortune under unjust, negligent, destructive + governments. + </p> + <p> + This nature, interrogated by princes, would teach them they are men and + not gods; that their power is only derived from the consent of other men; + that they themselves are citizens, charged by other citizens, with the + care of watching over the safety of the whole; that the law ought to be + only the expression of the public will; that it is never permitted them to + counteract nature, or to thwart the invariable end of society. This nature + would make monarchs feel, that to be truly great, to be decidedly + powerful, they ought to command elevated, virtuous souls; not minds + degraded by despotism, vitiated by superstition. This nature would teach + sovereigns, that in order to be cherished by their subjects, they ought to + afford them succour; to cause them to enjoy those benefits which their + wants render imperative, that they should at all times maintain them, + inviolably, in the possession of their rights, of which they are the + appointed defenders—of which they are the constituted guardians. + This nature would prove to all those princes who should deign to consult + her, that it is only by good actions, by kindness, they can either merit + the love, or secure the attachment of the people; that oppression does + nothing more than raise up enemies against them; that violence only makes + their power unsteady; that force, however brutally used, cannot confer on + them any legitimate right; that beings essentially in love with happiness, + must sooner or later finish by revolting against an authority that + establishes itself by injustice; that only makes itself felt by the + outrage it commits: this is the manner in which nature, the sovereign of + all beings, in whose system all are equal, would speak to one of these + superb monarchs, whom flattery has deified:—"Untoward, headstrong + child! Pigmy, so proud of commanding pigmies! Have they then assured thee + that thou art a god? Have they flattered thee that thou art something + supernatural? Know there is nothing superior to myself. Contemplate thine + own insignificance, acknowledge thine impotence against the slightest of + my blows. I can break thy sceptre; I can take away thine existence; I can + level thy throne with the dust; I can scatter thy people; I can destroy + even the earth which thou inhabitest; and yet thou hast the folly to + believe thou art a god. Be then, again, thyself; honestly avow that thou + art a man, formed to submit to my laws equally with the meanest of thy + subjects. Learn then, and never let it escape thy memory, that thou art + the man of thy people; the minister of thy nation; the interpreter of its + laws; the executer of its will; the fellow-citizen of those whom thou hast + the right of commanding, only because they consent to obey thee, in view + of that well being which thou promisest to procure for them. Reign, then, + on these conditions; fulfil thy sacred engagements. Be benevolent: above + all, equitable. If thou art willing to have thy power assured to thee, + never abuse it; let it be circumscribed by the immovable limits of eternal + justice. Be the father of thy people, and they will cherish thee as thy + children. But, if unmindful of thy duties, thou neglectest them; if + negligent of thine own interest, thou separatest them from those of thy + great family, if thou refusest to thy subjects that happiness which thou + owest them; if, heedless of thy own security, thou armest thyself against + them; thou shall be like all tyrants, the slave to gloomy care, the + bondman of alarm, the vassal of cruel suspicion: thou wilt become the + victim to thine own folly. Thy people, reduced to despair, shorn of their + felicity, will no longer acknowledge thy divine rights. In vain, then, + thou wouldst sue for aid to that superstition which hath deified thee; it + can avail nothing with thy people, whom sharp misery had rendered deaf; + heaven will abandon thee to the fury of those enemies to which thy frenzy + shall have given birth. Superstitious systems can effect nothing against + my irrevocable decrees, which will that man shall ever irritate himself + against the cause of his sorrows." + </p> + <p> + In short, every thing would make known to rational princes, that they have + no occasion for superstition to be faithfully obeyed on earth; that all + the powers contained in these systems will not sustain them when they + shall act the tyrant; that their true friends are those who undeceive the + people in their delusions; that their real enemies are those who + intoxicate them with flattery—who harden them in crime—who + make the road to heaven too easy for them—who feed them with + fanciful, chimerical doctrines, calculated to make them swerve from those + cares, to divert them from those sentiments, which they justly owe to + their nations. + </p> + <p> + It is then, I repeat it, only by re-conducting man to nature, that we can + procure him distinct notions, evident opinions, certain knowledge; it is + only by shewing him his true relations with his fellows, that we can place + him on the road to happiness. The human mind, blinded by theology, has + scarcely advanced a single step. Man's superstitious systems have rendered + him sceptical on the most demonstrable truths. Superstition, while it + pervaded every thing, while it had an universal influence, served to + corrupt the whole: philosophy, dragged in its train, although it swelled + its triumphant procession, was no longer any thing but an imaginary + science: it quitted the real world to plunge into the sinuosities of the + ideal, inconceivable labyrinths of metaphysics; it neglected nature, who + spontaneously opened her book to its examination, to occupy itself with + systems filled with spirits, with invisible powers, which only served to + render all questions more obscure; which, the more they were probed, the + more inexplicable they became; which took delight in promulgating that + which no one was competent to understand. In all difficulties it + introduced the Divinity; from thence things only became more and more + perplexed, until nothing could be explained. Theological notions appear + only to have been invented to put man's reason to flight; to confound his + judgment; to deceive his mind; to overturn his clearest ideas in every + science. In the hands of the theologian, logic, or the art of reasoning, + was nothing more than an unintelligible jargon, calculated to support + sophism, to countenance falsehood, to attempt to prove the most palpable + contradictions. Morality, as we have seen, became wavering and uncertain, + because it was founded on ideal systems, never in harmony with themselves, + which, on the contrary, were continually contradicting their own most + positive assertions. Politics, as we have elsewhere said, were cruelly + perverted by the fallacious ideas given to sovereigns of their actual + rights. Jurisprudence was determinately submitted to the caprices of + superstition, which shackled labour, chained down human industry, + controuled activity, and fettered the commerce of nations. Every thing, in + short, was sacrificed to the immediate interests of these theologians: in + the place of every rational science, they taught nothing but an obscure, + quarrelsome metaphysics, which but too often caused the blood of those + unhappy people to flow copiously who were incapable of understanding its + hallucinations. + </p> + <p> + Born an enemy to experience, theology, that supernatural science, was an + invincible obstacle to the progress of the natural sciences, as it almost + always threw itself in their way. It was not permitted to experimental + philosophy, to natural history, to anatomy, to see any thing but through + the jaundiced eye of superstition. The most evident facts were rejected + with disdain, proscribed with horror, when ever they could not be made to + quadrate with the idle hypotheses of superstition. Virgil, the Bishop of + Saltzburg, was condemned by the church, for having dared to maintain the + existence of the antipodes; Gallileo suffered the most cruel persecutions, + for asserting that the sun did not make its revolution round the earth. + Descartes was obliged to die in a foreign land. Priests, indeed, have a + right to be the enemies to the sciences; the progress of reason must, + sooner or later, annihilate superstitious ideas. Nothing that is founded + upon nature, that is bottomed upon truth, can ever be lost; while the + systems of imaginations, the creeds of imposture, must be overturned. + Theology unceasingly opposed itself to the happiness of nations—to + the progress of the human mind—to useful researches—to the + freedom of thought; it kept man in ignorance; all his steps being guided + by it, he was no more than a tissue of errors. Indeed, is it resolving a + question in natural philosophy, to say that an effect which excites our + surprise, that an unusual phenomenon, that a volcano, a deluge, a + hurricane, a comet, &c. are either signs of divine wrath, or works + contrary to the laws of nature? In persuading nations, as it has done, + that the calamities, whether physical or moral, which they experience, are + the effects of the divine anger, or chastisements which his power inflicts + on them, has it not, in fact, prevented them from seeking after remedies + for these evils? Would it not have been more useful to have studied the + nature of things, to have sought in nature herself, or in human industry, + for succours against those sorrows with which mortals are afflicted, than + to attribute the evil which man experiences to an unknown power, against + whose will it cannot be supposed there exists any relief? The study of + nature, the search after truth, elevates the soul, expands the genius, is + calculated to render man active, to make him courageous. Theological + notions appear to have been made to debase him, to contract his mind, to + plunge him into despondence. In the place of attributing to the divine + vengeance those wars, those famines, those sterilities, those contagions, + that multitude of calamities, which desolate the earth; would it not have + been more useful, more consistent with truth, to have shewn man that these + evils were to be ascribed to his own folly, or rather to the unruly + passions, to the want of energy, to the tyranny of some princes, who + sacrifice nations to their frightful delirium? The irrational people, + instead of amusing themselves with expiations for their pretended crimes, + seeking to render themselves acceptable to imaginary powers; should they + not rather have sought in a more healthy administration, the true means of + avoiding those scourges, to which they were the victims? Natural evils + demand natural remedies: ought not experience then long since to have + convinced mortals of the inefficacy of supernatural remedies, of expiatory + sacrifices, of fastings, of processions, &c. which almost all the + people of the earth have vainly opposed to the disasters which they + experienced? + </p> + <p> + Let us then conclude, that theology with its notions, far from being + useful to the human species, is the true source of all those sorrows which + afflict the earth of all those errors by which man is blinded; of those + prejudices which benumb mankind; of that ignorance which renders him + credulous; of those vices which torment him; of those governments which + oppress him. Let us be fully persuaded that those theological, + supernatural ideas, with which man is inspired from his infancy, are the + actual causes of his habitual folly; are the springs of his superstitious + quarrels; of his sacred dissensions; of his inhuman persecutions. Let us, + at length, acknowledge, that they are these fatal ideas which have + obscured morality; corrupted polities; retarded the progress of the + sciences; annihilated happiness; banished peace from the bosom of mankind, + Then let it be no longer dissimulated, that all those calamities, for + which man turns his eyes towards heaven, bathed in tears, have their + spring in the imaginary systems he has adopted: let him, therefore, cease + to expect relief from them; let him seek in nature, let him search in his + own energies, those resources, which superstition, deaf to his cries, will + never procure for him. Let him consult the legitimate desires of his + heart, and he will find that which he oweth to himself, also that which he + oweth to others; let him examine his own essence, let him dive into the + aim of society, from thence he will no longer be a slave; let him consult + experience, he will find truth, and he will discover, that <i>error can + never possible render him happy.</i> + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0012" id="link2H_4_0012"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. X. + </h2> + <p> + <i>Man can form no Conclusion from the Ideas which are offered him of the + Divinity.—Of their want of just Inference.—Of the Inutility of + his Conduct.</i> + </p> + <p> + It has been already stated, that ideas to be useful, must be founded upon + truth; that experience must at all times demonstrate their justice: if, + therefore, as we have proved, the erroneous ideas which man has in almost + all ages formed to himself of the Divinity, far from being of utility, are + prejudicial to morality, to politics, to the happiness of society, to the + welfare of the individuals who compose it, in short, to the progress of + the human understanding; reason, and our interest, ought to make us feel + the necessity of banishing from our mind these illusive, futile opinions, + which can never do more than confound it—which can only disturb the + tranquillity of our hearts. In vain should we flatter ourselves with + arriving at the correction of theological notions; erroneous in their + principles, they are not susceptible of reform. Under whatever shape an + error presents itself, as soon as man shall attach an undue importance to + it, it will, sooner or later, finish by producing consequences dangerous + in proportion to their extent. Besides, the inutility of those researches, + which in all ages have been made after the true nature of the Divinity, + the notions that have hitherto been entertained, have done little more + than throw it into greater obscurity, even to those who have most + profoundly meditated on the subject; then, ought not this very inutility + to convince us that this subject is not within the reach of our capacity + that this being will not be better known to us, or by our descendants, + than it hath been to our ancestors, either the most savage or the most + ignorant? The object, which of all others man has at all times reasoned + upon the most, written upon the most, nevertheless remains the least + known; far from progressing in his research, time, with the aid of + theological ideas, has only rendered it more impossible to be conceived. + If the Divinity be such as dreaming theology depicts, he must himself be a + Divinity who is competent to form an idea of him. We know little of man, + we hardly know ourselves, or our own faculties, yet we are disposed to + reason upon a being inaccessible to our senses. Let us, then, travel in + peace over the line described for us by nature, without having a wish to + diverge from it, to hunt after vague systems; let us occupy ourselves with + our true happiness; let us profit of the benefits spread before us; let us + labour to multiply them, by diminishing the number of our errors; let us + quietly submit to those evils we cannot avoid, and not augment them by + filling our mind with prejudices calculated to lead us astray. When we + shall give it serious reflection, every thing will clearly prove that the + pretended science of theology is, in truth, nothing but presumptuous + ignorance, masked under pompous, unintelligible words. In short, let us + terminate unfruitful researches; be content at least to acknowledge our + invincible ignorance; it will clearly be more substantively advantageous, + than an arrogant science, which has hitherto done little more than sow + discord on the earth—affliction in the heart of man. + </p> + <p> + In supposing a sovereign intelligence who governs the world; in supposing + a Divinity who exacts from his creatures that they should have a knowledge + of him, that they should understand his attributes, his wisdom, his power; + who is desirous they should render him homage; it must be allowed, that no + man on earth in this respect completely fulfils the views of providence. + Indeed, nothing is more demonstrable than the impossibility in which the + theologians find themselves, to form to their mind any idea whatever of + the Divinity. Procopius, the first bishop of the Goths, says in the most + solemn manner: "I esteem it a very foolish temerity to be disposed to + penetrate into the knowledge of the nature of God;" and further on he + acknowledges, "that he has nothing more to say of him, except that he is + perfectly good. He who knoweth more, whether he be ecclesiastic or layman, + has only to tell it." The weakness, the obscurity of the proofs offered, + of the systems attributed to him, the manifest contradictions into which + they fall, the sophisms, the begging of the question, which are employed, + evidently prove they are themselves in the greatest incertitude upon the + nature of that being with whom it is their profession to occupy their + thoughts: even the author of <i>A New View of Society</i> acknowledges, + "that up to this moment it is, not possible yet to say which is right or + which is wrong: that had any one of the various opposing systems which + until this day have governed the world, and disunited man from man, been + true, without any mixture of error; that system, very speedily after its + public promulgation, would have pervaded society, and compelled all men to + have acknowledged its truth." But granting that they have a knowledge of + this being, that his essence, his attributes, his systems, were so fully + demonstrated to them, as no longer to leave any doubt in their mind, do + the rest of the human race enjoy the same advantages? Are they, in fact, + in a condition to be charged with this knowledge? Ingenuously, how many + persons are to be found in the world, who have the leisure, the capacity, + the penetration, necessary to understand what is meant to be designated + under the name of an immaterial being—of a pure spirit, who moveth + matter without being himself matter; who is the motive of all the powers + of nature, without being contained in nature—without being able to + touch it? Are there, in the most religious societies, many persons who are + competent to follow their spiritual guides, in the subtle proofs which + they adduce in evidence of their creeds, upon which they bottom their + systems of theology? + </p> + <p> + Without question very few men are capable of profound, connected + meditation; the exercise of intense thought is, for the greater number, a + species of labour as painful as it is unusual. The people, obliged to toil + hard, in order to obtain subsistence, are commonly incapable of + reflection; nobles, men of the world, women, young people, occupied with + their own immediate affairs, taken up with gratifying their passions, + employed in procuring themselves pleasure, as rarely think deeply as the + uninformed. There are not, perhaps, two men in an hundred thousand, who + have seriously asked themselves the question, <i>What it is they + understand by the word God?</i> Whilst it is extremely rare to find + persons to whom the nature of God is a problem. Nevertheless, as we have + said, conviction supposes that evidence alone has banished doubt from the + mind. Where, then, are the web who are convinced of the rectitude of these + systems? Who are those in whom we shall find the complete certitude of + these truths, so important to all? Who are the persons, who have given + themselves an accurate account of the ideas they have formed upon the + Divinity, upon his attributes, upon his essence? Alas! throughout the + whole world, are only to be seen some speculators, who, by dint of + occupying themselves with the idea, have, with great fatuity, believed + they have discovered something decisive in the confused, unconnected + wanderings of their own imagination; they have, in consequence, + endeavoured to form a whole, which, chimerical as it is, they have + accustomed themselves to consider as actually existing: by force of musing + upon it, they have sometimes persuaded themselves they, saw it distinctly; + these have not unfrequently succeeded in making others believe, their + reveries, although they may not have mused upon it quite so much as + themselves. + </p> + <p> + It is seldom more than hearsay, that the mass of the people adopt either + the systems of their fathers, or of their priests: authority, confidence, + submission, habit, take place of conviction—supersede proof; they + prostrate themselves before idols, lend themselves to different creeds, + because their ancestors have taught them to fall down, and worship; but + never do they inquire wherefore they bend the knee: it is only because, in + times far distant, their legislators, their guides, have imposed it upon + them as a duty; these have said, "adore and believe those gods, whom ye + cannot comprehend; yield yourselves in this instance to our profound + wisdom; we know more than ye do respecting the Divinity." But wherefore, + it might be inquired, should I take this system upon your authority? It + is, they will reply, because the gods will have it thus; because they will + punish you, if you dare to resist. But are not these gods the thing in + question? Nevertheless, man has always been satisfied with this circle of + errors; the idleness of his mind made him find it most easy to yield to + the judgment of others. All superstitions are uniformly founded upon + error, established by authority; equally forbid examination; are equally + indisposed to permit that man should reason upon them; it is power that + wills he should unconditionally accredit them: they are rested solely upon + the influence of some few men, who pretend to a knowledge of things, which + they admit are incomprehensible for all their species; who, at the same + time, affirm they are sent as missionaries to announce them to the + inhabitants of the earth: these inconceivable systems, formed in the brain + of some enthusiastic persons, have most unquestionably occasion for men to + expound them to their fellows. Man is generally credulous as a child upon + those objects which relate to superstition; he is told he must believe + them; as he generally understands nothing of the matter, he imagines he + runs no risk in joining sentiments with his priest, whom he supposes has + been competent to discover what he himself is not able to comprehend. The + most rational people argue thus: "What shall I do? What interest can so + many persons have to deceive?" But, seriously, does this prove that they + do not deceive? They may do it from two motives: either because they are + themselves deceived, or because they have a great interest in deceiving. + By the confession of the theologians themselves, man is, for the greater + part, without <i>religion</i>: he has only <i>superstition</i>. + Superstition, according to them, "is a worship of the Divinity, either + badly understood or irrational," or else, "worship rendered to a false + Divinity." But where are the people or the clergy who will allow, either + that their Divinity is false, or their worship irrational? How shall it be + decided who is right, or who is wrong? It is evident that in this affair + great numbers must be wrong. Indeed, Buddaeus, in his <i>Treatise on + Atheism</i>, tells us, "in order that a religion may be true, not only the + object of the worship must be true, but we must also have a just idea of + it. He, then, who adoreth God without knowing him, adoreth him in a + perverse and corrupt manner, and is generally guilty of superstition." + This granted, would it not be fair to demand of the theologians, if they + themselves can boast of having a <i>just idea</i> or real knowledge of the + Divinity? + </p> + <p> + Admit for a moment they have, would it not then be evident, that it is for + the priest, for the inspired, for the metaphysician, that this idea, which + is said to be so necessary for the whole human race, is exclusively + reserved? If we examine, however, we shall not find any harmony among the + theological notions of these various inspired men, or of that hierarchy + which is scattered over the earth: even those who make a profession of the + same system, are not in unison upon the leading points. Are they ever + contented with the proofs offered by their colleagues? Do they unanimously + subscribe to each other's ideas? Are they agreed upon the conduct to be + adopted; upon the manner of explaining their texts; upon the + interpretation of the various oracles? Does there exist one country upon + the whole earth, where the science of theology is actually perfectioned?—where + the ideas of the Divinity are rendered so clear, as not to admit of cavil? + Has this science obtained any of that steadiness, any of that consistency, + any of that uniformity, which is found attached to other branches of human + knowledge; even to the most futile arts, or to those trades which are most + despised? Has the multitude of subtle distinctions, with which theology in + some countries is filled throughout; have the words spirit, immateriality, + incorporeity, predestination, grace, with other ingenious inventions, + imagined by sublime thinkers, who during so many ages have succeeded each + other, actually had any other effect than to perplex things; to render the + whole obscure; decidedly unintelligible? Alas! do, they not offer + practical demonstration, that the science held forth as the most necessary + to man, has not, hitherto, been able to acquire the least degree of + stability; has remained in the most determined state of indecision; has + entirely failed in obtaining solidity? For thousands of years the most + idle dreamers have been relieving each other, meditating on systems, + diving into concealed ways, inventing hypothesis suitable to develope this + important enigma. Their slender success has not at all discouraged + theological vanity; the priests have always spoken of it as of a thing + with which they were most intimately acquainted; they have disputed with + all the pertinancy of demonstrated argument; they have destroyed each + other with the most savage barbarity; yet, notwithstanding, to this + moment, this sublime science remains entirely unauthenticated; almost + unexamined. Indeed, if things were coolly contemplated, it would be + obvious that these theories are not formed for the generality of mankind, + who for the most part are utterly incompetent to comprehend the aerial + subtilities upon which they rest. Who is the man, that understandeth any + thing of the fundamental principles of these systems? Whose capacity + embraces spirituality, immateriality, incorporeity, or the mysteries of + which he is every day informed? Are there many persons who can boast of + perfectly understanding the state of the question, in those theological + disputations, which have frequently had the potency to disturb the repose + of mankind? Nevertheless, even women believe themselves obliged to take + part in the quarrels excited by these idle speculators, who are of less + actual utility, to society, than the meanest artizan. + </p> + <p> + Man would, perhaps, have been too happy, if confining himself to those + visible objects which interest him, he had employed half that energy which + he has wasted in researches after incomprehensible systems, upon + perfectioning the real sciences; in giving consistency to his laws; in + establishing his morals upon solid foundations; in spreading a wholesome + education among his fellows. He would, unquestionably, have been much + wiser, more fortunate, if he had agreed to let his idle, unemployed guides + quarrel among themselves unheeded; if he had permitted them to fathom + those depths calculated to astound the mind, to amaze the intellect, + without intermeddling with their irrational disputes. But it is the + essence of ignorance, to attach great importance to every thing which it + doth not understand. Human vanity makes the mind bear up against + difficulties. The more an object eludes our inquiry, the more efforts we + make to compass it; because from thence our pride is spurred on, our + curiosity is set afloat, our passions are irritated, and it assumes the + character of being highly interesting to us. On the other hand, the more + continued, the more laborious our researches have been, the more + importance we attach to either our real or our pretended discoveries; the + more we are desirous not to have wasted our time; besides, we are always + ready warmly to defend the soundness of our own judgment. Do not let us + then be surprised at the interest that ignorant persons have at all times + taken in the discoveries of their priests; nor at the obstinate + pertinacity which they have ever manifested in their disputes. Indeed, in + combating for his own peculiar system, each only fought for the interests + of his own vanity, which of all human passions is the most quickly + alarmed, the most calculated to lead man on to the commission of great + follies. + </p> + <p> + Theology is truly the vessel of the Danaides. By dint of contradictory + qualities, by means of bold assertions, it has so shackled its own systems + as to render it impossible they should act. Indeed, when even we should + suppose the existence of these theological systems, the reality of codes + so discordant with each other and with themselves, we can conclude nothing + from them to authorize the conduct, or sanction the mode of worship which + they prescribe. If their gods are infinitely good, wherefore should we + dread them? If they are infinitely wise, what reason have we to disturb + ourselves with our condition? If they are omniscient, wherefore inform + them of our wants, why fatigue them with our requests? If they are + omnipresent, of what use can it be to erect temples to them? If they are + lords of all, why make sacrifices to them; why bring them offerings of + what already belongs to them? If they are just, upon what foundation + believe that they will punish those creatures whom they have filled with + imbecility? If their grace works every thing in man, what reason can there + be why he should be rewarded? If they are omnipotent, how can they be + offended; how can we resist them? If they are rational, how can the enrage + themselves against blind mortals, to whom they have left the liberty of + acting irrationally? If they are immutable, by what right shall we pretend + to make them change their decrees? If they are inconceivable, wherefore + should we occupy ourselves with them? If the knowledge of these systems be + the most necessary thing, wherefore are they not more evident, more + consistent, more manifest? + </p> + <p> + This granted, he who can undeceive himself on the afflicting notions of + these theories, hath this advantage over the credulous, trembling, + superstitious mortal—that he establishes in his heart a momentary + tranquility, which, at least, rendereth him happy in this life. If the + study of nature hath banished from his mind, those chimeras with which the + superstitions man is infested, he, at least, enjoys a security of which + this sees himself deprived. In consulting this nature, his fears are + dissipated, his opinions, whether true or false, acquire a steadiness of + character; a calm succeeds the storm, which panic terror, the result of + wavering notions, excite in the hearts of all men who occupy themselves + with these systems. If the human soul, cheered by philosophy, had the + boldness to consider things coolly; it would no longer behold the universe + submitted to implacable systems, under which man is continually trembling. + If he was rational, he would perceive that in committing evil he did not + disturb nature; that he either injureth himself alone, or injures other + beings capable of feeling the effects of his conduct, from thence he would + know the line of his duties; he would prefer virtue to vice, for his own + permanent repose: he would, for his own satisfaction, for his own felicity + in this world, find himself deeply interested in the practice of moral + goodness; in rendering virtue habitual; in making it dear to the feeling + of his heart: his own immediate welfare would be concerned in avoiding + vice, in detesting crime, during the short season of his abode among + intelligent, sensible beings, from whom he expects his happiness. By + attaching himself to these rules, he would live contented with his own + conduct; he would be cherished by those who are capable of feeling the + influence of his actions; he would expect without inquietude the term when + his existence should have a period; he would have no reason to dread the + existence which <i>might</i> follow the one he at present enjoys: he would + not fear to be deceived in his reasonings. Guided by demonstration, led + gently along by honesty, he would perceive, that he could have nothing to + dread from a beneficent Divinity, who would not punish him for those + involuntary errors which depend upon the organization, which without his + own consent he has received. + </p> + <p> + Such a man so conducting himself, would have nothing to apprehend, whether + at the moment of his death, he falls asleep for ever; or whether that + sleep is only a prelude to another existence, in which he shall find + himself in the presence of his God. Addressing himself to the Divinity, he + might with confidence say, + </p> + <p> + "O God! Father, who hath rendered thyself invisible to thy child! + Inconceivable, hidden Author of all, whom I could not discover! Pardon me, + if my limited understanding hath not been able to know thee, in a nature, + where every thing hath appeared to me to be necessary! Excuse me, if my + sensible heart hath not discerned thine august traits among those numerous + systems which superstitious mortals tremblingly adore: if, in that + assemblage of irreconcileable qualities, with which the imagination hath + clothed thee, I could only see a phantom. How could my coarse eyes + perceive thee in nature, in which all my senses have never been able to + bring me acquainted but with material beings, with, perishable forms? + Could I, by the aid of these senses, discover thy spiritual essence, of + which no one could furnish me any idea? Could my feeble brain, obliged to + form its judgments after its own capacity, discern thy plans, measure thy + wisdom, conceive thine intelligence, whilst the universe presented to my + view a continued mixture of order and confusion—of good and evil—of + formation and destruction? Have I been able to render homage to the + justice of thy priests, whilst I so frequently beheld crime triumphant, + virtue in tears? Could I possibly acknowledge the voice of a being filled + with wisdom, in those ambiguous, puerile, contradictory oracles, published + in thy name in the different countries of the earth I have quitted? If I + have not known thy peculiar existence, it is because I have not known + either what thou couldst be, where thou couldst be placed, or the + qualities which could be assigned thee. My ignorance is excusable, because + it was invincible: my mind could not bend itself under the authority of + men, who acknowledged they were as little enlightened upon thine essence + as myself; who were for ever disputing among themselves; who were in + harmony only in imperiously crying out to me, to sacrifice to them that + reason which thou hadst given to me; But, oh God! If thou cherishest thy + creatures, I also, like thee, have cherished them; I have endeavoured to + render them happy, in the sphere in which I have lived. If thou art the + author of reason, I have always listened to it—have ever endeavoured + to follow it; if virtue pleaseth thee, my heart hath always honoured it; I + have never willingly outraged it: when my powers have permitted me, I have + myself practised it; I was an affectionate husband, a tender father, a + sincere friend, a faithful subject, a zealous citizen; I have held out + consolation to the afflicted; and if the foibles of my nature have been + either injurious to myself or incommodious to others, I have not at least + made the unfortunate groan under the weight of my injustice. I have not + devoured the substance of the poor—I have not seen without pity the + widow's tears; I have not heard without commiseration the cries of the + orphan. If thou didst render man sociable, if thou was disposed that + society should subsist, if thou wast desirous the community might be + happy, I have been the enemy to all who oppressed him, the decided foe to + all those who deceived him, in order that they might advantage themselves + of his misfortunes. + </p> + <p> + "If I have not thought properly of thee, it is because my understanding + could not conceive thee; if I have spoken ill of thy systems, it is + because my heart, partaking too much of human nature, revolted against the + odious portrait under which they depicted thee. My wanderings have been + the effect of the temperament which thou hast given me; of the + circumstances in which, without my consent, thou hast placed me; of those + ideas, which in despite of me, have entered into my mind. As thou art + good, as thou art just, (as we are assured thou art) thou wilt not punish + me for the wanderings of mine imagination; for faults caused by my + passions, which are the necessary consequence of the organization which I + have received from thee. Thus I cannot doubt thy justice, I cannot dread + the condition which thou preparest for me. Thy goodness cannot have + permitted that I should incur punishment for inevitable errors. Thou + wouldst rather prevent my being born, than have called me into the rank of + intelligent beings, there to enjoy the fatal liberty of rendering myself + eternally unhappy." + </p> + <p> + It is thus that a disciple of nature, who, transported all at once into + the regions of space, should find himself in the presence of his God, + would be able to speak, although he should not have been in a condition to + lend himself to all the abstract systems of theology which appear to have + been invented for no other purpose than to overturn in his mind all + natural ideas. This illusory science seems bent an forming its systems in + a manner the most contradictory to human reason; notwithstanding we are + obliged to judge in this world according to its dictates; if, however, in + the succeeding world, there is nothing conformable to this, what can be of + more inutility, than to think of it or reason upon it? Besides, wherefore + should we leave it to the judgment of men, who are, themselves, only + enabled to act after our manner? + </p> + <p> + Without a very marked derangement of our organs, our sentiments hardly + ever vary upon those objects which either our senses experience, or which + reason has clearly demonstrated, In whatever circumstances we are found, + we have no doubt either upon the whiteness of snow, the light of day, or + the utility of virtue. It is not so with those objects which depend solely + upon our imagination—which are not proved to us by the constant + evidence of our senses; we judge of them variously, according to the + dispositions in which we find ourselves. These dispositions fluctuate by + reason of the involuntary impulse which our organs every instant receive, + on the part of an infinity of causes, either exterior to ourselves, or + else contained within our own frame. These organs are, without our + knowledge, perpetually modified, either relaxed or braced by the density, + more or less, of the atmosphere; by heat and by cold; by dryness and by + humidity; by health and by sickness; by the heat of the blood; by the + abundance of bile; by the state of the nervous system, &c. These + various causes have necessarily an influence upon the momentary ideas, + upon the instantaneous thoughts, upon the fleeting opinions of man, He is, + consequently, obliged to see under a great variety of hues, those objects + which his imagination presents to him; without it all times having the + capacity to correct them by experience: to compare them by memory. This, + without doubt, is the reason why man is continually obliged to view his + gods, to contemplate his superstitious systems, under such a diversity of + aspects, in different periods of his existence. In the moment, when his + fibres find themselves disposed to he tremulous, he will be cowardly, + pusillanimous; he will think of these systems only with fear and + trembling. In the moment, when these same fibres shall have more tension, + he will possess more firmness, he will then view these systems with + greater coolness. The theologian will call his pusillanimity, "inward + feeling;" "warning from heaven;" "secret inspiration;" but he who knoweth + man, will say that this is nothing more than a mechanical motion, produced + by a physical or natural cause. Indeed, it is by a pure physical + mechanism, that we can explain all the revolutions that take place in the + system, frequently from one minute to another; all the fluctuations in the + opinions of mankind; all the variations of his judgment: in consequence of + which we sometimes see him reasoning justly, sometimes in the most + irrational manner. + </p> + <p> + This is the mode by which, without recurring to grace, to inspirations, to + visions, to supernatural notions, we can render ourselves an account of + that uncertain, that wavering state into which we sometimes behold persons + fall, when there is a question respecting their superstition, who are + otherwise extremely enlightened. Frequently, in despite of all reasoning, + momentary dispositions re-conduct them to the prejudices of their infancy, + upon which on other occasions they appear to be entirely undeceived. These + changes are very apparent, especially under infirmities, in sickness, or + at approach of death. The barometer of the understanding is then + frequently obliged to fall. Those chimeras which he despised, or which in + a state of health, he set down at their true value, are then realized. He + trembles, because his machine is enfeebled; he is irrational because his + brain is incapable of fulfilling its functions with exactitude. It is + evident these are the actual causes of those changes which the priests + well know how to make use of against what they call incredulity; from + which they draw proofs of the reality of their sublimated opinions. Those + conversions, or those alterations, which take place, in the ideas of man, + have always their origin in some derangement of his machine; brought on + either by chagrin or by some other natural or known cause. + </p> + <p> + Submitted to the continual influence of physical causes, our systems + invariably follow the variations of the body; we reason well when the body + is healthy—when it is soundly constituted; we reason badly when the + corporeal faculties are deranged; from thence our ideas become + disconnected, we are no longer equal to the task of associating them with + precision; we are incapable of finding principles, or to draw from them + just inferences; the brain, in fact, is shaken; we no longer contemplate + any thing under its actual point of view. It is a man of this kind, who + does not see things in frosty weather, under the same traits as when the + season is cloudy, or when it is rainy; he does not view them in the same + manner in sorrow as in gaiety; when in company as when alone. Good sense + suggests to us, that it is when the body is sound, when the mind is + undisturbed by any mist, that we can reason with accuracy; this state can + furnish us with a general standard, calculated to regulate our judgment; + even to rectify our ideas, when unexpected causes shall make them waver. + </p> + <p> + If the opinions even of the same individual, are fluctuating, subject to + vaccillate, how many changes must they experience in the various beings + who compose the human race? If there do not, perhaps, exist two persons + who see a physical object under the same exact form or colour, what much + greater variety must they not have in their mode of contemplating those + things which have existence only in their imagination? What an infinity of + combinations, what a multitude of ideas, must not minds essentially + different, form to themselves when they endeavour to compose an ideal + being, which each moment of their existence must present to them under a + different aspect? It would, then, be a most irrational enterprise, to + attempt to prescribe to man what he ought to think of superstition, which + is entirely under the cognizance of his imagination; for the admeasurement + of which, as we have very frequently repeated, mortals will never have any + common standard. To oppugn the superstitious opinions of man, is to + commence hostilities with his imagination—to attack his fancy—to + be at war with his organization—to enter the lists with his habits, + which are of themselves sufficient to identify with his existence, the + most absurd, the most unfounded ideas. The more imagination man has, the + greater enthusiast he will be in matters of superstition; reason will have + the less ability to undeceive him in his chimeras. In proportion as his + fancy is powerful, these chimeras themselves will become food necessary to + its ardency. In fine, to battle with the superstitious notions of man, is + to combat the passions he usually indulges for the marvellous; it is to + assail him on that side where he is least vulnerable; to force him in that + position where he unites all his strength—where he keeps the most + vigilant guard. In despite of reason, those persons who have a lively + imagination, are perpetually re-conducted to those chimeras which habit + renders dear to them, even when they are found troublesome; although they + should prove fatal. Thus a tender soul hath occasion for a God that loveth + him; the happy enthusiast needeth a God who rewardeth him; the unfortunate + visionary wants a God who taketh part in his sorrows; the melancholy + devotee requireth a God who chastiseth him, who maintaineth him in that + trouble which has become necessary to his diseased organization; the + frantic penitent exacteth a God, who imposes upon him an obligation to be + inhuman towards himself; whilst the furious fanatic would believe himself + unhappy, if he was deprived of a God who commanded him to make others + experience the effect of his inflamed humours, of his unruly passions. + </p> + <p> + He is, without question, a less dangerous enthusiast who feeds himself + with agreeable illusions, than he whose soul is tormented with odious + spectres. If a placid, tender soul, does not commit ravages in society, a + mind agitated by incommodious passions, cannot fall to become, sooner or + later, troublesome to his fellow creatures. The God of a Socrates, or a + Fenelon, may be suitable to souls as gentle as theirs; but he cannot be + that of a whole nation, in which it is extremely rare men of their temper + are found: if honest men only view their gods as fitted with benefits; + vicious, restless, inflexible individuals, will give them their own + peculiar character, from thence will authorize themselves to indulge, a + free course to their passions. Each will view his deities with eyes only + open to his own reigning prejudice; the number of those who will paint + them as afflicting will always be greater, much more to be feared, than + those who shall delineate them under seducing colors: for one mortal that + those ideas will render happy, there will be thousands who will be made + miserable; they will, sooner or later, become an inexhaustible source of + contention; a never failing spring of extravagant folly; they will disturb + the mind of the ignorant, over whom impostors will always gain ascendancy—over + whom fanatics will ever have an influence: they will frighten the + cowardly, terrify the pussillanimous, whose imbecility will incline them + to perfidy, whose weakness will render them cruel; they will cause the + most upright to tremble, who, even while practising virtue, will fear + incurring the divine displeasure; but they will not arrest the progress of + the wicked, who will easily cast them aside, that they may the more + commodiously deliver themselves up to crime; or who will even take + advantage of these principles, to justify their transgression. In short, + in the hands of tyrants, these systems will only serve to crush the + liberty of the people; will be the pretext for violating, with impunity, + all equitable rights. In the hands of priests they will become talismans, + suitable to intoxicate the mind; calculated to hoodwink the people; + competent to subjugate equally the sovereign as the subject; in the hands + of the multitude, they will be a two-edged sword, with which they will + inflict, at the same moment, the most dreadful wounds on themselves—the + most serious injuries on their associates. + </p> + <p> + On the other hand, these theological systems, as we have seen, being only + an heap of contradictions, which represent the Divinity under the most + incompatible characters, seem to doubt his wisdom, when they invite + mortals to address their prayers to him, for the gratification of their + desires; to pray to him to grant that which he has not thought it proper + to accord to them. Is it not, in other words, to accuse him with + neglecting his creatures? Is it not to ask him to alter the eternal + decrees of his justice; to change the invariable laws which he hath + himself determined? Is it not to say to him, "O, my God! I acknowledge thy + wisdom, thine omniscience, thine infinite goodness; nevertheless, thou + forgettest thy servant; thou losest sight of thy creature; thou art + ignorant, or thou feignest ignorance, of that which he wanteth: dost thou + not see that I suffer from the marvellous arrangement, which thy wise laws + have made in the universe? Nature, against thy commands, actually renders + my existence painful: change then, I beseech thee, the essence which thy + will has given to all beings. Grant that the elements, at this moment, + lose in my favor their distinguishing properties; so order it, that heavy + bodies shall not fall, that fire shall not burn, that the brittle frame + which I have received at thine hands, shall not suffer those shocks which + it every instant experiences. Rectify, I pray thee, for my happiness, the + plan which thine infinite prudence hath marked out from all eternity." + Such is very nearly the euchology which man adopts; such are the + discordant, absurd requests which he continually puts up to the Divinity, + whose wisdom he extols; whose intelligence he holds forth to admiration; + whose providence he eulogizes; whose equity he applauds; whilst he is + hardly ever contented with the effects of the divine perfections. + </p> + <p> + Man is not more consequent in those thanksgivings which he believes + himself obliged to offer to the throne of grace. Is it not just, he + exclaims, to thank the Divinity for his kindness? Would it not be the + height of ingratitude to refuse our homage to the Author of our existence; + to withhold our acknowledgements from the Giver of every thing that + contributes to render it agreeable? But does he not frequently offer up + his thanksgivings for actions that overwhelm his neighbour with misery? + Does not the husbandman on the hill, return thanks for the rain that + irrigates his lands parched with drought, whilst the cultivator of the + valley is imploring a cessation of those showers which deluge his fields—that + render useless the labour of his hands? Thus each becomes thankful for + that which his own limited views points out to him as his immediate + interest, regardless of the general effect produced by those circumstances + on the welfare of his fellows. Each believes that it is either a peculiar + dispensation of providence in his own favor, or a signal of the heavenly + wrath directed against himself; whilst the slightest reflection would + clearly evince it to be nothing more than the inevitable order of things, + which take place without the least regard to his individual comforts. From + this it will be obvious, that these systems do not teach their votaries, + practically, to love their neighbour as themselves. But in matters of + superstition, mortals never reason; they only follow the impulse of their + fears; the direction of their imagination; the force of their temperament; + the bent of their own peculiar passions; or those of the guides, who have + acquired the right of controling their understanding. Fear has generally + created these systems; terror unceasingly accompanies them; it is + impossible to reason while we tremble. + </p> + <p> + We do not, however, flatter ourselves that reason will be capable, all at + once, to deliver the human race from those errors with which so many + causes united have contributed to poison him. The vainest of all projects + would be the expectation of curing, in an instant, those epidemical + follies, those hereditary fallacies, rooted during so many ages; + continually fed by ignorance; corroborated by custom; borne along by the + passions made inveterate by interest; grounded upon the fears, established + upon the ever regenerating calamities of nations. The ancient disasters of + the earth gave birth to the first systems of theology, new revolutions + would equally produce others; even if the old ones should chance to be + forgotton. Ignorant, miserable, trembling beings, will always either form + to themselves systems, or else adopt those which imposture shall announce—which + fanaticism shall be disposed to give them. + </p> + <p> + It would therefore be useless to propose more than to hold out reason to + those who are competent to understand it; to present truth to those who + can sustain its lustre; who can with serenity contemplate its refulgent + beauty; to undeceive those who shall not be inclined to oppose obstacles + to demonstration; to enlighten those who shall not desire pertinaciously + to persist in error. Let us, then, infuse courage into those who want + power to break with their illusions; let us cheer up the honest man, who + is much more alarmed by his fears than the wicked, who, in despite of his + opinions, always follows the rule of his passions: let us console the + unfortunate, who groans under a load of prejudices which he has not + examined: let us dissipate the incertitude of those whose doubts render + them unhappy; who ingenuously seek after truth, but who find in philosophy + itself only wavering opinions little calculated to determine their + fluctuating minds. Let us banish from the man of genius those chimerical + speculations which cause him to waste his time; let us wrest his gloomy + superstition from the intimidated mortal, who, duped by his vain fears, + becomes useless to society; let us remove from the atrabilarious being + those systems that afflict him, that exasperate his mind, that do nothing + more than kindle his anger against his incredulous neighbour; let us tear + from the fanatic those terrible ideas which arm him with poniards against + the happiness of his fellows; let us pluck from tyrants, let us snatch + from impostors, those opinions which enable them to terrify, to enslave, + and to despoil the human species. In removing from honest men their + formidable notions let us not encourage those of the wicked, who are the + enemies of society; let us deprive the latter of those illegitimate + sources, upon which they reckon to expiate their transgressions; let us + substitute actual, present terrors, to those which are distant and + uncertain to those which do not arrest the most licentious excesses; let + us make the profligate blush at beholding themselves what they really are; + let the ministers of superstition tremble at finding their conspiracies + discovered; let them dread the arrival of the day, when mortals, cured of + those errors with which they have abused them, will no longer be enslaved + by their artifice. + </p> + <p> + If we cannot induce nations to lay aside their inveterate prejudices, let + us, at least, endeavour to prevent them from relapsing into those + excesses, to the commission of which superstition has so frequently + hurried them; let mankind form to himself chimeras, if he cannot do + without them; let him think as he may feel inclined, provided his reveries + do not make him forget that he is a man; that he does not cease to + remember that a sociable being is not formed to resemble the most + ferocious animals. Let us try to balance the fictitious interests of + superstition, by the more immediate advantages of the earth. Let + sovereigns, as well as their subjects, at length acknowledge that the + benefits resulting from truth, the happiness arising from justice, the + tranquillity springing out of wholesome laws, the blessings to be derived + from a rational education, the superiority to be obtained from a physical, + peaceable morality, are much more substantive than those they vainly + expect from their respective superstitious systems, Let them feel, that + advantages so tangible, benefits so precious, ought not to be sacrificed + to uncertain hopes, so frequently contradicted by experience. In order to + convince themselves of these truths, let every rational man consider the + numberless crimes which superstition has caused upon our globe; let them + study the frightful history of theology: let them read over the biography + of its more odious ministers, who have too often fanned the spirit of + discord—kindled the flame of fury—stirred up the raging fire + of madness: let the prince and the people, at least, sometimes learn to + resist the demoniacal passions of these interpreters of unintelligible + systems, which they acknowledge they do not themselves at all understand, + especially when they shall invoke them to be inhuman; when they shall + preach up intolerance; when they invite them to barbarity; above all, when + they shall command them, in the name of their gods, to stifle the cries of + nature; to put down the voice of equity; to be deaf to the remonstrances + of reason; to be blind to the interest of society. + </p> + <p> + Feeble mortals! led astray by error, how long will ye permit your + imagination, so active, so prompt to seize on the marvellous, to continue + to seek out of the universe pretexts to render you baneful to yourselves, + injurious to the beings with whom ye live in society? Wherefore do ye not + follow in peace, the simple, easy route marked out for ye by nature? To + what purpose do ye scatter thorns on the road of life? What avails it, + that ye multiply those sorrows to which your destiny exposes ye? What + advantages can ye derive from systems with which the united efforts of the + whole human species have not been competent to bring ye acquainted? Be + content, then, to remain ignorant of that, which the human mind is not + formed to comprehend; which human intellect is not adequate to embrace: + occupy yourselves with truth; learn the invaluable art of living happy; + perfection your morals; give rationality to your governments; simplify + your laws, and rest them on the pillars of justice; watch over education, + and see that it is of an invigorating quality; give attention to + agriculture, and encourage beneficial improvements; foster those sciences + which are actually useful, and place their professors in the most + honorable stations; labor with ardour, and munificently reward those whose + assiduity promotes the general welfare; oblige nature by your industry to + open her immense stores, to become propitious to your exertions; do these + things, and the gods will oppose nothing to your felicity. Leave to idle + thinkers, to soporific dreamers, to waking visionaries, to useless + enthusiasts, the unproductive task, the unfruitful occupation, of + fathoming depths, from which ye ought sedulously to divert your attention; + enjoy with moderation, the benefits attached to your present existence; + augment their number when reason sanctions the multiplication; but never + attempt to spring yourselves forward, beyond the sphere destined for your + action. If you must have chimeras, permit your fellow creatures to have + theirs also; but never cut the throats of your brethren, when, they cannot + rave in your own manner. If ye will have unintelligible systems, if ye + cannot be contented without marvellous doctrines, if the infirmities of + your nature require an invisible crutch, adopt such as may best suit with + your humour; select those which you may think most calculated to support + your tottering frame; if ye can, let your own imagination give birth to + them; but do not insist on your neighbours making the same choice with + yourself: do not suffer these imaginary theories to infuriate your mind: + let them not so far intoxicate your understandings, as to make ye mistake + the duties ye owe to the real beings with whom ye are associated. Always + remember, that amongst these duties, the foremost, the most consequential, + the most immediate in its bearing upon the felicity of the human race, + stands, <i>a reasonable indulgence for the foibles of others</i>. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0013" id="link2H_4_0013"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. XI. + </h2> + <p> + <i>Defence of the Sentiments contained in this Work.—Of Impiety.—Do + there exist Atheists?</i> + </p> + <p> + What has been said in the course of this work, ought sufficiently to + undeceive those who are capable of reasoning on the prejudices to which + they attached so much importance. But the most evident truths frequently + crouch under fear; are kept at bay by habit; prove abortive against the + force of enthusiasm. Nothing is more difficult to remove from its resting + place than error, especially when long prescription has given it full + possession of the human mind. It is almost unassailable when supported by + general consent; when it is propagated by education; when it has acquired + inveteracy by custom: it commonly resists every effort to disturb it, when + it is either fortified by example, maintained by authority, nourished by + the hopes, or cherished by the fears of a people, who have learned to look + upon these delusions as the most potent remedies for their sorrows. Such + are the united forces which sustain the empire of unintelligible systems + over the inhabitants of this world; they appear to give stability to their + throne; to render their power immoveable; to make their reign as lasting + as the human race. + </p> + <p> + We need not, then, be surprised at seeing the multitude cherish their own + blindness; encourage their superstitious notions; exhibit the most + sensitive fear of truth. Every where we behold mortals obstinately + attached to phantoms from which they expect their happiness; + notwithstanding these fallacies are evidently the source of all their + sorrows. Deeply smitten with the marvellous, disdaining the simple, + despising that which is easy of comprehension, but little instructed in + the ways of nature, accustomed to neglect the use of their reason, the + uninformed, from age to age, prostrate themselves before those invisible + powers which they have been taught to adore. To these they address their + most fervent prayers; implore them in their misfortunes, offer them the + fruits of their labour; they are unceasingly occupied either with thanking + their vain idols for benefits they have not received at their bands, or + else in requesting from them favors which they can never obtain. Neither + experience nor reflection can undeceive them; they do not perceive these + idols, the work of their own hands, have always been deaf to their + intreaties; they ascribe it to their own conduct; believe them to be + violently irritated: they tremble, groan out the most dismal lamentations; + sigh bitterly in their temples; strew their altars with presents; load + their priests with their largesses; it never strikes their attention that + these beings, whom they imagine so powerful, are themselves submitted to + nature; are never propitious to their wishes, but when nature herself is + favourable. It is thus that nations are the accomplices of those who + deceive them; are themselves as much opposed to truth as those who lead + them astray. + </p> + <p> + In matters of superstition, there are very few persons who do not partake, + more or less, of the opinions of the illiterate. Every man who throws + aside the received ideas, is generally considered a madman; is looked upon + as a presumptuous being, who insolently believes himself much wiser than + his associates. At the magical sound of superstition, a sudden panic, a + tremulous terror takes possession of the human species: whenever it is + attacked, society is alarmed; each individual imagines he already sees the + celestial monarch lift his avenging arm against the country in which + rebellious nature has produced a monster with sufficient temerity to brave + these sacred opinions. Even the most moderate persons tax with folly, + brand with sedition, whoever dares combat with these imaginary systems, + the rights of which good sense has never yet examined. In consequence, the + man who undertakes to tear the bandeau of prejudice, appears an irrational + being—a dangerous citizen; his sentence is pronounced with a voice + almost unanimous; the public indignation, roused by fanaticism, stirred up + by imposture, renders it impossible for him to be heard in his defence; + every one believes himself culpable, if he does not exhibit his fury + against him; if he does not display his zeal in hunting him down; it is by + such means man seeks to gain the favor of the angry gods, whose wrath is + supposed to be provoked. Thus the individual who consults his reason, the + disciple of nature, is looked upon as a public pest; the enemy to + superstition is regarded as the enemy to the human race; he who would + establish a lasting peace amongst men, is treated as the disturber of + society; the man who would be disposed to cheer affrighted mortals by + breaking those idols, before whom prejudice has obliged them to tremble, + is unanimously proscribed as an atheist. At the bare name of atheist the + superstitious man quakes; the deist himself is alarmed; the priest enters + the judgement chair with fury glaring in his eyes; tyranny prepares his + funeral pile, the vulgar applaud the punishments which irrational, partial + laws, decree against the true friend of the human species. + </p> + <p> + Such are the sentiments which every man must expect to excite, who shall + dare to present his fellow creatures with that truth which all appear to + be in search of, but which all either fear to find, or else mistake what + we are disposed to shew it to them. But what is this man, who is so foully + calumniated as an atheist? He is one who destroyeth chimeras prejudicial + to the human race; who endeavours to re-conduct wandering mortals back to + nature; who is desirous to place them upon the road of experience; who is + anxious that they should actively employ their reason. He is a thinker, + who, having meditated upon matter, its energies, its properties, its modes + of acting, hath no occasion to invent ideal powers, to recur to imaginary + systems, in order to explain the phenomena of the universe—to + develope the operations of nature; who needs not creatures of the + imagination, which far from making him better understand nature, do no + more than render it wholly inexplicable, an unintelligible mass, useless + to the happiness of mankind. + </p> + <p> + Thus, the only men who can have pure, simple, actual ideas of nature, are + considered either as absurd or knavish speculators. Those who form to + themselves distinct, intelligible notions of the powers of the universe, + are accused of denying the existence of this power: those who found every + thing that is operated in this world, upon determinate, immutable laws, + are accused with attributing every thing to chance; are taxed with + blindness, branded with delirium, by those very enthusiasts themselves, + whose imagination, always wandering in a vacuum, regularly attribute the + effects of nature to fictitious causes, which have no existence but in + their own heated brain; to fanciful beings of their own creation; to + chimerical powers, which they obstinately persist in preferring to actual, + demonstrable causes. No man in his proper senses can deny the energy of + nature, or the existence of a power by virtue of which matter acts; by + which it puts itself in motion; but no man can, without renouncing his + reason, attribute this power to an immaterial substance; to a power placed + out of nature; distinguished from matter; having nothing in common with + it. Is it not saying, this power does not exist, to pretend that it + resides in an unknown being, formed by an heap of unintelligible + qualities, of incompatible attributes, from whence necessarily results a + whole, impossible to have existence? Indestructible elements, the atoms of + Epicurus, of which it is said the motion, the collision, the combination, + have produced all beings, are, unquestionably, much more tangible than the + numerous theological systems, broached in various parts of the earth. + Thus, to speak precisely, they are the partizans of imaginary theories, + the advocates of contradictory beings, the defenders of creeds, impossible + to be conceived, the contrivers of substances which the human mind cannot + embrace on any side, who are either absurd or knavish; those enthusiasts, + who offer us nothing but vague names, of which every thing is denied, of + which nothing is affirmed, are the real <i>Atheists</i>; those, I say, who + make such beings the authors of motion, the preservers of the universe, + are either blind or irrational. Are not those dreamers, who are incapable + of attaching any one positive idea to the causes of which they unceasingly + speak, true deniers? Are not those visionaries, who make a pure nothing + the source of all beings, men really groping in the dark? Is it not the + height of folly to personify abstractions, to organize negative ideas, and + then to prostrate ourselves before the figments of our own brain? + </p> + <p> + Nevertheless, they are men of this temper who regulate the opinions of the + world; who hold up to public scorn, those who are consistent to principle; + who expose to the most infuriate vengeance, those who are more rational + than themselves. If you will but accredit those profound dreamers, there + is nothing short of madness, nothing on this side the most complete + derangement of intellect, that can reject a totally incomprehensible + motive-power in nature. Is it, then, delirium to prefer the known to the + unknown? Is it a crime to consult experience, to call in the evidence of + our senses, in the examination of that which we are informed is the most + important to be understood? Is it a horrid outrage to address ourselves to + reason; to prefer its oracles to the sublime decisions of some sophists, + who themselves acknowledge they do not comprehend any thing of the systems + they announce? Nevertheless, according to these men, there is no crime + more worthy of punishment—there is no enterprize more dangerous to + morals—no treason more substantive against society, than to despoil + these immaterial substances, which they know nothing about, of those + inconceivable qualities which these learned doctors ascribe to them—of + that equipage with which a fanatical imagination has furnished them—of + those miraculous properties with which ignorance, fear, and imposture have + emulated each other in surrounding them: there is nothing more impious + than to call forth man's reason upon superstitious creeds; nothing more + heretical than to cheer up mortals against systems, of which the idea + alone is the source of all their sorrows; there is nothing more pious, + nothing more orthodox, than to exterminate those audacious beings who have + had sufficient temerity to attempt to break an invisible charm that keeps + the human species benumbed in error: if we are to put faith in the + asseverations of the hierarchy, to be disposed to break man's chains is to + rend asunder his most sacred bonds. + </p> + <p> + In consequence of these clamours, perpetually renovated by the disciples + of imposture, kept constantly afloat by the theologians, reiterated by + ignorance, those nations, which reason, in all ages, has sought to + undeceive, have never dared to hearken to its benevolent lessons: they + have stood aghast at the very name of physical truth. The friends of + mankind were never listened to, because they were the enemies to his + superstition—the examiners of the doctrines of his priest. Thus the + people continued to tremble; very few philosophers had the courage to + cheer them; scarcely any one dared brave public opinion; completely + inoculated by superstition, they dreaded the power of imposture, the + menaces of tyranny, which always sought to uphold themselves by delusion. + The yell of triumphant ignorance, the rant of haughty fanaticism, at all + time stifled the feeble voice of the disciple of nature; his lessons were + quickly forgotten; he was obliged to keep silence; when he even dared to + speak, it was frequently only in an enigmatical language, perfectly + unintelligible to the great mass of mankind. How should the uninformed, + who with difficulty compass the most evident truths, those that are the + most distinctly announced, be able to comprehend the mysteries of nature, + presented under half words, couched under intricate emblems. + </p> + <p> + In contemplating the outrageous language which is excited among + theologians, by the opinions of those whom they choose to call atheists; + in looking at the punishments which at their instigation were frequently + decreed against them, should we not be authorized to conclude, that these + doctors either are not so certain as they say they are, of the + infallibility of their respective systems; or else that they do not + consider the opinions of their adversaries so absurd as they pretend? It + is always either distrust, weakness, or fear, frequently the whole united, + that render men cruel; they have no anger against those whom they despise; + they do not look upon folly as a punishable crime. We should be content + with laughing at an irrational mortal, who should deny the existence of + the sun; we should not think of punishing him, unless we had, ourselves, + taken leave of our senses. Theological fury never proves more than the + imbecility of its cause. Lucian describes Jupiter, who disputing with + Menippus, is disposed to strike him to the earth with his thunder; upon + which the philosopher says to him, "Ah! thou vexest thyself, thou usest + thy thunder! then thou art in the wrong." The inhumanity of these + men-monsters, whose profession it was to announce chimerical systems to + nations, incontestibly proves, that they alone have an interest in the + invisible powers they describe; of which they successfully avail + themselves to terrify, mortals: they are these tyrants of the mind, + however, who, but little consequent to their own principles, undo with one + hand that which they rear up with the other: they are these profound + logicians who, after having formed a deity filled with goodness, wisdom + and equity, traduce, disgrace, and completely annihilate him, by saving he + is cruel, capricious, unjust, and despotic: this granted, these men are + truly impious; decidedly heretical. + </p> + <p> + He who knoweth not this system, cannot do it any injury, consequently + cannot be called impious. "To be impious," says Epicurus, "is not to take + away from the illiterate the gods which they have; it is to attribute to + these gods the opinions of the vulgar." To be impious is to insult systems + which we believe; it is knowingly to outrage them. To be impious, is to + admit a benevolent, just God, at the same time we preach up persecution + and carnage. To be impious, is to deceive men in the name of a Deity, whom + we make use of as a pretext for our own unworthy passions. To be impious, + is to speak falsely on the part of a God, whom we suppose to be the enemy + of falsehood. In fine, to be impious, is to make use of the name of the + Divinity in order to disturb society—to enslave it to tyrants—to + persuade man that the cause of imposture is the cause of God; it is to + impute to God those crimes which would annihilate his divine perfections. + To be impious, and irrational, at the same time, is to make, by the + aggregation of discrepant qualities, a mere chimera of the God we adore. + </p> + <p> + On the other hand, to be pious, is to serve our country with fidelity; it + is to be useful to our fellow creatures; to labour to the welfare of + society. Every one can put in his claim to this piety, according to his + faculties; he who meditates can render himself useful, when he has the + courage to announce truth—to attack error—to battle those + prejudices which everywhere oppose themselves to the happiness of mankind; + it is to be truly useful, it is even a duty, to wrest from the hands of + mortals those homicidal weapons which wretched fanatics so profusely + distribute among them; it is highly praiseworthy to deprive imposture of + its influence; it is loving our neighbour as ourself to despoil tyranny of + its fatal empire over opinion, which at all times it so successfully + employs to elevate knaves at the expence of public happiness; to erect its + power upon the ruins of liberty; to establish unruly passions upon the + wreck of public security. To be truly pious, is religiously to observe the + wholesome laws of nature; to follow up faithfully those duties which she + prescribes to us; in short, to be pious is to be humane, equitable, + benevolent: it is to respect the rights of mankind. To be pious and + rational at the same time, is to reject those reveries which would be + competent to make us mistake the sober counsels of reason. + </p> + <p> + Thus, whatever fanaticism, whatever imposture may say, he who denieth the + solidity of systems which have no other foundation than an alarmed + imagination; he who rejecteth creeds continually in contradiction with + themselves; he who banisheth from his heart, doctrines perpetually + wrestling with nature, always in hostility with reason, ever at war with + the happiness of man; he, I repeat, who undeceiveth himself on such + dangerous chimeras, when his conduct shall not deviate from those + invariable rules which sound morality dictates, which nature approves, + which reason prescribes, may be fairly reputed pious, honest, and + virtuous. Because a man refuseth to admit contradictory systems, as well + as the obscure oracles, which are issued in the name of the gods, does it + then follow, that such a man refuses to acknowledge the evident, the + demonstrable laws of nature, upon which he depends, of which he in obliged + to fulfil the necessary duties, under pain of being punished in this + world; whatever he may be in the in the next? It is true, that if virtue + could by any chance consist in an ignominious renunciation of reason, in a + destructive fanaticism, in useless customs, the atheist, as he is called, + could not pass for a virtuous being: but if virtue actually consists in + doing to society all the good of which we are capable, this miscalled + atheist may fairly lay claim to its practice: his courageous, tender soul, + will not be found guilty, for hurling his legitimate indignation against + prejudices, fatal to the happiness of the human species. + </p> + <p> + Let us listen, however, to the imputations which the theologians lay upon + those men they falsely denominate atheists; let us coolly, without any + peevish humour, examine the calumnies which they vomit forth against them: + it appears to them that atheism, (as they call differing in opinion from + themselves,) is the highest degree of delirium that can assail the human + mind; the greatest stretch of perversity that can infect the human heart; + interested in blackening their adversaries, they make incredulity the + undeniable offspring of folly; the absolute effect of crime. "We do not," + say they to us, "see those men fall into the horrors of atheism, who have + reason to hope the future state will be for them a state of happiness." In + short, according to these metaphysical doctors, it is the interest of + their passions which makes them seek to doubt systems, at whose tribunals + they are accountable for the abuses of this life; it is the fear of + punishment which is alone known to atheists; they are unceasingly + repeating the words of a Hebrew prophet, who pretends that nothing but + folly makes men deny these systems; perhaps, however, if he had suppressed + his negation, he would have more closely aproximated the truth. Doctor + Bentley, in his <i>Folly of Atheism</i>, has let loose the whole + Billingsgate of theological spleen, which he has scattered about with all + the venom of the most filthy reptiles: if he and other expounders are to + be believed, "nothing is blacker than the heart of an atheist; nothing is + more false than his mind. Atheism," according to them, "can only be the + offspring of a tortured conscience, that seeks to disengage itself from + the cause of its trouble. We have a right", says Derham, "to look upon an + atheist as a monster among rational beings; as one of those extraordinary + productions which we hardly ever meet with in the whole human species; and + who, opposing himself to all other men, revolts not only against reason + and human nature, but against the Divinity himself." + </p> + <p> + We shall simply reply to all these calumnies by saying, it is for the + reader to judge if the system which these men call atheism, be as absurd + as these profound speculators (who are perpetually in dispute on the + uninformed, ill organized, contradictory, whimsical productions of their + own brain) would have it believed to be! It is true, perhaps, that the + system of naturalism hitherto has not been developed in all its extent: + unprejudiced persons however, will, at least, be enabled to know whether + the author has reasoned well or ill; whether or not he has attempted to + disguise the most important difficulties; distinctly to see if he has been + disingenuous; they will be competent to observe if, like unto the enemies + of human reason, he has recourse to subterfuges, to sophisms, to subtle + discriminations, which ought always to make it suspected of those who use + them, either that they do not understand or else that they fear the truth. + It belongs then to candour, it is the province of disinterestedness, it is + the duty of reason to judge, if the natural principles which have been + here ushered to the world be destitute of foundation; it is to these + upright jurisconsults that a disciple of nature submits his opinions: he + has a right to except against the judgment of enthusiasm; he has the + prescription to enter his caveat against the decision of presumptuous + ignorance; above all, he is entitled to challenge the verdict of + interested knavery. Those persons who are accustomed to think, will, at + least find reasons to doubt many of those marvellous notions, which appear + as incontestable truths only to those, who have never assayed them by the + standard of good sense. + </p> + <p> + We agree with Derham, that atheists are rare; but then we also say, that + superstition has so disfigured nature, so entangled her rights—enthusiasm + has so dazzled the human mind-terror has so disturbed the heart of man—imposture + has so bewildered his imagination—tyranny has so enslaved his + thoughts: in fine, error, ignorance, and delirium have so perplexed and + confused the clearest ideas, that nothing is more uncommon than to find + men who have sufficient courage to undeceive themselves on notions which + every thing conspires to identify with their very existence. Indeed, many + theologians in despite of those bitter invectives with which they attempt + to overwhelm the men they choose to call atheists, appear frequently to + have doubted whether any ever existed in the world. Tertullian, who, + according to modern systems, would be ranked as an atheist, because he + admitted a corporeal God, says, "Christianity has dissipated the ignorance + in which the Pagans were immersed respecting the divine essence, and there + is not an artizan among the Christians who does not see God, and who does + not know him." This uncertainty of the theologic professors was, + unquestionably, founded upon those absurd ideas, which they ascribe to + their adversaries, whom they have unceasingly accused with attributing + every thing to chance—to blind causes—to dead, inert matter, + incapable of self-action. We have, I think, sufficiently justified the + partizans of nature against these ridiculous accusations; we have + throughout the whole proved, and we repeat it, that chance is a word + devoid of sense, which as well as all other unintelligible words, + announces nothing but ignorance of actual causes. We have demonstrated + that matter is not dead; that nature, essentially active and + self-existent, has sufficient energy to produce all the beings which she + contains—all the phenomena we behold. We have, throughout, made it + evident that this cause is much more tangible, more easy of comprehension, + than the inconceivable theory to which theology assigns these stupendous + effects. We have represented, that the incomprehensibility of natural + effects was not a sufficient reason for assigning to them a system still + more incomprehensible than any of those of which, at least, we have a + slight knowledge. In fine, if the incomprehensibility of a system does not + authorize the denial of its existence, it is at least certain that the + incompatibility of the attributes with which it is clothed, authorizes the + assertion, that those which unite them cannot be any thing more than + chimeras, of which the existence is impossible. + </p> + <p> + This granted, we shall be competent to fix the sense that ought to be + attached to the name of atheist; which, notwithstanding, the theologians + lavish on all those who deviate in any thing from their opinions. If, by + atheist, be designated a man who denieth the existence of a power inherent + in matter, without which we cannot conceive nature, and if it be to this + power that the name of God is given, then there do not exist any atheists, + and the word under which they are denominated would only announce fools. + But if by atheists be understood men without enthusiasm; who are guided by + experience; who follow the evidence of their senses; who see nothing in + nature but what they actually find to have existence, or that which they + are capacitated to know; who neither do, nor can perceive any thing but + matter essentially active, moveable, diversely combined, in the full + enjoyment of various properties, capable of producing all the beings who + display themselves to our visual faculties, if by atheists be understood + natural philosophers, who are convinced that without recurring to + chimerical causes, they can explain every thing, simply by the laws of + motion; by the relation subsisting between beings; by their affinities; by + their analogies; by their aptitude to attraction; by their repulsive + powers; by their proportions; by their combinations; by their + decomposition: if by atheists be meant these persons who do not understand + what <i>Pneumatology</i> is, who do not perceive the necessity of + spiritualizing, or of rendering incomprehensible, those corporeal, + sensible, natural causes, which they see act uniformly; who do not find it + requisite to separate the motive-power from the universe; who do not see, + that to ascribe this power to an immaterial substance, to that whose + essence is from thenceforth totally inconceivable, is a means of becoming + more familiar with it: if by atheists are to be pourtrayed those men who + ingenuously admit that their mind can neither receive nor reconcile the + union of the negative attributes and the theological abstractions, with + the human and moral qualities which are given to the Divinity; or those + men who pretend that from such an incompatible alliance, there could only + result an imaginary being; seeing that a pure spirit is destitute of the + organs necessary to exercise the qualities, to give play to the faculties + of human nature: if by atheists are described those men who reject + systems, whose odious and discrepant qualities are solely calculated to + disturb the human species—to plunge it into very prejudicial + follies: if, I repeat it, thinkers of this description are those who are + called atheists, it is not possible to doubt their existence; and their + number would be considerable, if the light of sound natural philosophy was + more generally diffused; if the torch of reason burnt more distinctly; or + if it was not obscured by the theological bushel: from thence, however, + they would be considered neither as irrational; nor as furious beings, but + as men devoid of prejudice, of whose opinions, or if they prefer it, whose + ignorance, would be much more useful to the human race, than those ideal + sciences, those vain hypotheses, which for so many ages have been the + actual causes of all man's tribulation. + </p> + <p> + Doctor Cudworth, in his <i>Intellectual System</i>, reckons four species + of atheists among the ancients. + </p> + <p> + First.—The disciples of Anaximander, called <i>Hylopathians</i>, who + attributed every thing to matter destitute of feeling. His doctrine was, + that men were born of earth united with water, and vivified by the beams + of the sun; his crime seems to have been, that he made the first + geographical maps and sun-dials; declared the earth moveable and of a + cylindrical form. + </p> + <p> + Secondly.—The <i>Atomists</i>, or the disciples of Democritus, who + attribute every thing, to the concurrence of atoms. His crime was, having + first taught that the milky way was occasioned by the confused light from + a multitude of stars. + </p> + <p> + Thirdly.—The <i>Stoics</i>, or the disciples of Zeno, who admitted a + blind nature acting after certain laws. His crime appears to be, that he + practised virtue with unwearied perseverance, and taught that this quality + alone would render mankind happy. + </p> + <p> + Fourthly.—The <i>Hylozoists</i>, or the disciples of Strato, who + attributed life to matter. His crime consisted in being one of the most + acute natural philosophers of his day, enjoying high favour with Ptolemy + Philadelphus, an intelligent prince, whose preceptor be was. + </p> + <p> + If, however, by atheists, are meant those men, who are obliged to avow, + that they have not one idea of the system they adore, or which they + announce to others; who cannot give any satisfactory account, either of + the nature or of the essence of their immaterial substances; who can never + agree amongst themselves on the proofs which they adduce in support of + their System; on the qualities or on the modes of action of their + incorporeities, which by dint of negations they render a mere nothing; who + either prostrate themselves, or cause others to bow down, before the + absurd fictions of their own delirium: if, I say, by atheists, be + denominated men of this stamp, we shall be under the necessity of + allowing, that the world is filled with them: we shall even be obliged to + place in this number some of the most active theologians, who are + unceasingly reasoning upon that Which they do not understand; who are + eternally disputing upon points which they cannot demonstrate; who by + their contradictions very efficaciously undermine their own systems; who + annihilate all their own assertions of perfection, by the numberless + imperfections with which they clothe them; who rebel against their gods by + the atrocious character under which they depict them. In short, we shall + be able to consider as true atheists, those credulous, weak persons, who + upon hearsay and from tradition, bend the knee before idols, of whom they + have no other ideas, than those which are furnished them by their + spiritual guides, who themselves acknowledge that they comprehend nothing + about the matter. + </p> + <p> + What has been said amply proves that the theologians themselves have not + always known the sense they could affix to the word atheist; they have + vaguely attacked, in an indistinct manner, calumniated with it, those + persons whose sentiments and principles were opposed to their own. Indeed, + we find that these sublime professors, always infatuated with their own + particular opinions, have frequently been extremely lavish in their + accusations of atheism, against all those whom they felt a desire to + injure; whose characters it was their pleasure to paint in unfavourable + colours; whose doctrines they wished to blacken; whose systems they sought + to render odious: they were certain of alarming the illiterate, of rousing + the antipathies of the silly, by a loose imputation, or by a word, to + which ignorance attaches the idea of horror, merely because it is + unacquainted with its true sense. In consequence of this policy, it has + been no uncommon spectacle to see the partizans of the same sect, the + adorers of the same gods, reciprocally treat each other as atheists, in + the fervour of their theological quarrels; to be an atheist, in this + sense, is not to have, in every point, exactly the same opinions as those + with whom we dispute, either on superstitious or religious subjects. In + all times the uninformed have considered those as atheists, who did not + think upon the Divinity precisely in the same manner as the guides whom + they were accustomed to follow. Socrates, the adorer of a unique God, was + no more than an atheist in the eyes of the Athenian people. + </p> + <p> + Still more, as we have already observed, those persons have frequently + been accused of atheism, who have taken the greatest pains to establish + the existence of the gods, but who have not produced satisfactory proofs: + when their enemies wished to take advantage of them, it was easy to make + them pass for atheists, who had wickedly betrayed their cause, by + defending it too feebly. The theologians have frequently been very highly + incensed against those who believed they had discovered the most forcible + proof of the existence of their gods, because they were obliged to + discover that their adversaries could make very contrary inductions from + their propositions; they did not perceive that it was next to impossible + not to lay themselves open to attack, in establishing principles visibly + founded upon that which each man sees variously. Thus Paschal says, "I + have examined if this God, of whom all the world speaks, might not have + left some marks of himself. I look every where, and every where I see + nothing but obscurity. Nature offers one nothing, that may not be a matter + of doubt and inquietude. If I saw nothing in nature which indicated a + Divinity, I should determine with myself, to believe nothing about it. If + every where I saw the sign of a creator, I should repose myself in peace, + in the belief of one. But seeing too much to deny, and too little to + assure me of his existence, I am in a situation that I lament, and in + which I have an hundred times wished, that if a God doth sustain nature, + he would give unequivocal marks of it, and that if the signs which he hath + given be deceitful, that he would suppress them entirely; that he said all + or nothing, to the end that I might see which side I ought to follow." + </p> + <p> + In a word, those who have most vigorously taken up the cause of the + theological systems, have been taxed with atheism and irreligion; the most + zealous partizans have been looked upon as deserters, have been + contemplated as traitors; the most orthodox theologians have not been able + to guarantee themselves from this reproach; they have mutually bespatered + each other; prodigally lavished, with malignant reciprocity, the most + abusive terms: nearly all have, without doubt, merited these invectives, + if in the term atheist be included those men who have not any idea of + their various systems, that does not destroy itself, whenever they are + willing to submit it to the touchstone of reason. From whence we may + conclude, without subjecting ourselves to the reproach of being hasty, + that error will not stand the test of investigation; that it will not pass + the ordeal of comparison; that it is in its hues a perfect chamelion; that + consequently it can never do more than lead to the most absurd deductions: + that the most ingenious systems, when they have their foundations in + hallucination, crumble like dust under the rude band of the assayer; that + the most sublimated doctrines, when they lack the substantive quality of + rectitude, evaporate under the scrutiny of the sturdy examiner, who tries + them in the crucible; that it is not by levelling abusive language against + those who investigate sophisticated theories, they will either be purged + of their absurdities, acquire solidity, or find an establishment to give + them perpetuity; that moral obliquities, can never be made rectilinear by + the mere application of unintelligible terms, or by the inconsiderate + jumble of discrepant properties, however gaudy the assemblage: in short, + that the only criterion of truth is, <i>that it is ever consistent with + itself</i>. + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0014" id="link2H_4_0014"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. XII. + </h2> + <h3> + <i>Is what is termed Atheism compatible with Morality?</i> + </h3> + <p> + After having proved the existence of those whom the superstitious bigot, + the heated theologian, the inconsequent theist, calls <i>atheists</i>, let + us return to the calumnies which are so profusely showered upon them by + the deicolists. According to Abady, in his <i>Treatise on the Truth of the + Christian Religion</i>, "an atheist cannot be virtuous: to him virtue is + only a chimera; probity no more than a vain scruple; honesty nothing but + foolishness;—he knoweth no other law than his interest: where this + sentiment prevails, conscience is only a prejudice; the law of nature only + an illusion; right no more than an error; benevolence hath no longer any + foundation; the bonds of society are loosened; the ties of fidelity are + removed; friend is ready to betray friend; the citizen to deliver up his + country; the son to assassinate his father, in order to enjoy his + inheritance, whenever they shall find occasion, and that authority or + silence shall shield them from the arm of the secular power, which alone + is to be feared. The most inviolable rights, and most sacred laws, must no + longer be considered, except as dreams and visions." Such, perhaps, would + be the conduct, not of a feeling, thinking, reflecting being, susceptible + of reason; but of a ferocious brute, of an irrational wretch, who should + not have any idea of the natural relations which subsist between beings, + reciprocally necessary to each other's happiness. Can it actually be + supposed, that a man capable of experience, furnished with the faintest + glimmerings of sound sense, would lend himself to the conduct which is + here ascribed to the atheist; that is to say, to a man who is conversant + with the evidence of facts; who ardently seeks after truth; who is + sufficiently susceptible of reflection, to undeceive himself by reasoning + upon those prejudices which every one strives to shew him as important; + which all voices endeavour to announce to him as sacred? Can it, I repeat, + be supposed, that any enlightened, any polished society, contains a + citizen so completely blind, not to acknowledge his most natural duties; + so very absurd, not to admit his dearest interests; so completely besotted + not to perceive the danger he incurs in incessantly disturbing his fellow + creatures; or in following no other rule, than his momentary appetites? Is + not every human being who reasons in the least possible manner, obliged to + feel that society is advantageous to him; that he hath need of assistance; + that the esteem of his fellows is necessary to his own individual + happiness; provoked, that he has every thing to fear from the wrath of his + associates; that the laws menace whoever shall dare to infringe them? + Every man who has received a virtuous education, who has in his infancy + experienced the tender cares of a parent; who has in consequence tasted + the sweets of friendship; who has received kindness; who knows the worth + of benevolence; who sets a just value upon equity; who feels the pleasure + which the affection of our fellow creatures procures for us; who endures + the inconveniences which result from their aversion who smarts under the + sting which is inflicted by their scorn, is obliged to tremble at losing, + by his measures, such manifest advantages—at incurring such, + imminent danger. Will not the hatred of others, the fear of punishment, + his own contempt of himself, disturb his repose every time that, turning, + inwardly upon his own conduct, he shall contemplate it under the same + perspective as does his neighbour? Is there then no remorse but for those + who believe in incomprehensible systems? Is the idea that we are tinder + the eye of beings of whom we have but vague notions, more forcible than + the thought that we are viewed by our fellow men; than the fear of being + detected by ourselves; than the dread of exposure; than the cruel + necessity of becoming despicable in our own eyes; than the wretched + alternative, to be constrained to blush guiltily, when we reflect on our + wild career, and the sentiments which it must infallibly inspire? + </p> + <p> + This granted, we shall reply deliberately to this Abady, that an atheist + is a man who understands nature, who studies her laws; who knows his own + nature; who feels what it imposes upon him. An atheist hath experience; + this experience proves to him every moment that vice can injure him; that + his most concealed faults, his most secret dispositions, may be detected—may + display his character in open day; this experience proves to him that + society is useful to his happiness; that his interest authoritatively + demands he should attach himself to the country that protects him, which + enables him to enjoy in security the benefits of nature; every thing shews + him that in order to be happy he must make himself beloved; that his + parent is for him the most certain of friends; that ingratitude would + remove him from his benefactor; that justice is necessary to the + maintenance of every association; that no man, whatever way he his power, + can be content with himself, when he knows he is an object of public + hatred. He who has maturely reflected upon himself, upon his own nature, + upon that of his associates, upon his own wants, upon the means of + procuring them, cannot prevent himself from becoming acquainted with his + duties—from discovering the obligations he owes to himself, as well + as those which he owes to others; from thence he has morality, he has + actual motives to confirm himself to its dictates; he is obliged to feel, + that these duties are imperious: if his reason be not disturbed by blind + passions, if his mind be not contaminated by vicious habits, he will find + that virtue is the surest road to felicity. The atheists, as they are + styled, or the fatalists, build their system upon necessity: thus, their + moral speculations, founded upon the nature of things, are at least much + more permanent, much more invariable, than those which only rest upon + systems that alter their aspect according to the various dispositions of + their adherents—in conformity with the wayward passions of those who + contemplate, them. The essence of things, and the immutable laws of + nature, are not subject to fluctuate; it is imperative with the atheist, + as he is facetiously called by the theologian, to call whatever injures + himself either vice or folly; to designate that which injures others, + crime; to describe all that is advantageous to society, every thing which + contributes to its permanent happiness, virtue. + </p> + <p> + It will be obvious, then, that the principles of the miscalled atheist are + much less liable to be shaken, than those of the enthusiast, who shall + have studied a baby from his earliest Infancy; who should have devoted not + only his days, but his nights, to gleaning the scanty portion of actual + information that he scatters through his volumes; they will have a much + more substantive foundation than those of the theologian, who shall + construct his morality upon the harlequin scenery of systems that so + frequently change, even in his own distempered brain. If the atheist, as + they please to call those who differ in opinion with themselves, objects + to the correctness, of—their systems, he cannot deny his own + existence, nor that of beings similar to himself, by whom he is + surrounded; he cannot doubt the reciprocity of the relations that subsist + between them; he cannot question the duties which spring out of these + relations; Pyrrhonism, then, cannot enter his mind upon the actual + principles of morality; which is nothing more than the science of the + relations of beings living together in society. + </p> + <p> + If, however, satisfied with a barren, speculative knowledge of his duties, + the atheist of the theologian should not apply them in his conduct—if, + hurried along by the current of his ungovernable passions—if, borne + forward by criminal habits—if, abandoned to shameful vices-if, + possessing a vicious temperament, which he has not been sedulous to + correct—if, lending himself to the stream of outrageous desires, he + appears to forget his moral obligations, it by no means follows, either + that he hath no principles, or that his principles are false: it can only + be concluded from such conduct, that in the intoxication of his passions, + in the delirium of his habits, in the confusion of his reason, he does not + give activity to doctrines grounded upon truth; that he forgets to give + currency to ascertained principles; that he may follow those propensities + which lead him astray. In this, indeed, he will have dreadfully descended + to the miserable level of the theologian, but he will nevertheless find + him the partner of his folly—the partaker of his insanity—the + companion of his crime. + </p> + <p> + Nothing is, perhaps, more common among men, than a very marked discrepancy + between the mind and the heart; that is to say, between the temperament, + the passions, the habits the caprices, the imagination, and the judgment, + assisted by reflection. Nothing is, in fact, more rare, than to find these + harmoniously running upon all fours with each other; it is, however, only + when they do, that we see speculation influence practice. The most certain + virtues are those which are founded upon the temperament of man. Indeed, + do we not every day behold mortals in contradiction with themselves? Does + not their more sober judgment unceasingly condemn the extravagancies to + which their undisciplined passions deliver them up? In short, doth not + every thing prove to us hourly, that men, with the very best theory, have + sometimes the very worst practice; that others with the most vicious + theory, frequently adopt the most amiable line of conduct? In the blindest + systems, in the most atrocious superstitions, in those which are most + contrary to reason, we meet with virtuous men, the mildness of whose + character, the sensibility of whose hearts, the excellence of whose + temperament, re conducts them to humanity, makes them fall back upon the + laws of nature, in despite of their furious theories. Among the adorers of + the most cruel, vindictive, jealous gods, are found peaceable, souls, who + are enemies to persecution; who set their faces against violence; who are + decidedly opposed to cruelty: among the disciples of a God filled with + mercy, abounding in clemency, are seen barbarous monsters; inhuman + cannibals: nevertheless, both the one and the other acknowledge, that + their gods ought to serve them for a model. Wherefore, then, do they not + in all things conform themselves? It is because the most wicked systems + cannot always corrupt a virtuous soul; that those which are most bland, + most gentle in their precepts, cannot always restrain hearts driven along + by the impetuosity of vice. The organization will, perhaps, be always more + potential than either superstition or religion. Present objects, momentary + interests, rooted habits, public opinion, have much more efficacy than + unintelligible theories, than imaginary systems, which themselves depend + upon the organic structure of the human frame. + </p> + <p> + The point in question then is, to examine if the principles of the + atheist, as he is erroneously called, be true, and not whether his conduct + be commendable? An atheist, having an excellent theory, founded upon + nature, grafted upon experience, constructed upon reason, who delivers + himself up to excesses, dangerous to himself, injurious to society, is, + without doubt, an inconsistent man. But he is not more to be feared than a + superstitious bigot; than a zealous enthusiast; or than even a religious + man who, believing in a good, confiding in an equitable, relying on a + perfect God, does not scruple to commit the most frightful devastations in + his name. An atheistical tyrant would assuredly not be more to be dreaded + than a fanatical despot. An incredulous philosopher, however, is not so + mischievous a being as an enthusiastic priest, who either fans the flame + of discord among his fellow subjects, or rises in rebellion against his + legitimate monarch. Would, then, an atheist clothed with power, be equally + dangerous as a persecuting priest-ridden king; as a savage inquisitor; as + a whimsical devotee; or, as a morose bigot? These are assuredly more + numerous in the world than atheists, as they are ludicrously termed, whose + opinions, or whose vices are far from being in a condition to have an + influence upon society; which is ever too much hoodwinked by the priest, + too much blinded by prejudice, too much the slave of superstition, to be + disposed to give them a patient hearing. + </p> + <p> + An intemperate, voluptuous atheist, is not more dangerous to society than + a superstitions bigot, who knows how to connect licentiousness, punic + faith, ingratitude, libertinism, corruption of morals, with his + theological notions. Can it, however, be ingeniously imagined, that a man, + because he is falsely termed an atheist, or because he does not subscribe + to the vengeance of the most contradictory systems, will therefore be a + profligate debaucheé, malicious, and persecuting; that he will corrupt the + wife of his friend; will turn his own wife adrift; will consume both his + time and his money in the most frivolous gratifications; will be the slave + to the most childish amusements; the companion of the most dissolute men; + that he will discard all his old friends; that he will select his bosom + confidents from the brazen betrayers of their native land—from among + the hoary despoilers of connubial happiness—from out of the ranks of + veteran gamblers; that he will either break into his neighbour's dwelling, + or cut his throat; in short, that he will lend himself to all those + excesses, the most injurious to society, the most prejudicial to himself, + the most deserving public castigation? The blemishes of an atheist, then, + as the theologian styles him, have not any thing more extraordinary in + them than those of the superstitious man; they possess nothing with which + his doctrine can be fairly reproached. A tyrant, who should be + incredulous, would not be a more incommodious scourge to his subjects, + than a theological autocrat, who should wield his sceptre to the misery of + his people. Would the nation of the latter feel more happy, from the mere + circumstance that the tyger who governed it believed in the most abstract + systems, heaped the most sumptuous presents on the priests, and humiliated + himself at their shrine? At least it must be acknowledged, according to + the shewing of the theologian himself, that under the dominion of the + atheist, a nation would not have to apprehend superstitious vexations; to + dread persecutions for opinion; to fear proscriptions for ill-digested + systems; neither would it witness those strange outrages that have + sometimes been Committed for the interests of heaven, even under the + mildest monarchs. If it was the victim to the turbulent passions of an + unbelieving prince, the sacrifice to the folly of a sovereign who should + be an infidel, it would not, at least, suffer from his blind infatuation, + for theological systems which he does not understand; nor from his + fanatical zeal, which of all the passions that infest monarchs, is ever + the most destructive, always the most dangerous. An atheistical tyrant, + who should persecute for opinions, would be a man not consistent with his + own principles; he could not exist; he would not, indeed, according to the + theologian, be an atheist at most, he would only furnish one more example, + that mortals much more frequently follow the blind impulse of their + passions, the more immediate stimulus of their interest, the irresistible + torrent of their temperament, than their speculations, however grave, + however wise. It is, at least, evident, that an atheist has one pretext + less than a credulous prince, for exercising his natural wickedness. + </p> + <p> + Indeed, if men condescended to examine things coolly, they would find that + on this earth the name of God is but too frequently made use of as a + motive to indulge the worst of human passions. Ambition, imposture, and + tyranny, have often formed a league to avail themselves of its influence, + to the end that they might blind the people, and bend them beneath a + galling yoke: the monarch sometimes employs it to give a divine lustre to + his person—the sanction of heaven to his rights—the confidence + of its votaries to his most unjust, most extravagant whims. The priest + frequently uses it to give currency to his pretensions, to the end that he + may with impunity gratify his avarice, minister to his pride, secure his + independence. The vindictive, enraged, superstitious being, introduces the + cause of his gods, that he may give free scope to his fury, which he + qualifies with zeal. In short, superstition becomes dangerous, because it + justifies those passions, lends legitimacy to those crimes, holds forth as + commendable those excesses, of which it does not fail to gather the fruit: + according to its ministers, every thing is permitted to revenge the most + high: thus the name of the Divinity is made use of to authorize the most + baneful actions, to palliate the most injurious transgressions. The + atheist, as he is called, when he commits crimes, cannot, at least, + pretend that it is his gods who command them, or who clothe them with the + mantle of their approval, this is the excuse the superstitious being + offers for his perversity; the tyrant for his persecutions; the priest for + his cruelty, and for his sedition; the fanatic for the ebullition of his + boiling passions; the penitent for his inutility. + </p> + <p> + "They are not," says Bayle, "the general opinions of the mind, but the + passions, which determine us to act." Atheism, as it is called, is a + system which will not make a good man wicked but it may, perhaps, make a + wicked man good. "Those," says the same author, "who embraced the sect of + Epicurus, did not become debaucheés because they had adopted the doctrine + of Epicurus; they only lent themselves to the system, then badly + understood, because they were debaucheés." In the same manner, a perverse + man may embrace atheism, because he will flatter himself, that this system + will give full scope to his passions: he will nevertheless be deceived. + Atheism, as it is called, if well understood, is founded upon nature and + upon reason, which never can, like superstition, either justify or expiate + the crimes of the profligate. + </p> + <p> + From the diffusion of doctrines which make morality depend upon + unintelligible, incomprehensible systems, that are proposed to man for a + model, there has unquestionably resulted very great inconvenience. Corrupt + souls, in discovering, how much each of these suppositions are erroneous + or doubtful, give loose to the rein of their vices, and conclude there are + not more substantive motives for acting well; they imagine that virtue, + like these fragile systems, is merely chimerical; that there is not any + cogent solid reason for practising it in this world. Nevertheless, it must + be evident, that it is not as the disciples of any particular tenet, that + we are bound to fulfil the duties of morality; it is as men, living + together in society, as sensible beings seeking to secure to ourselves a + happy existence, that we should feel the moral obligation. Whether these + systems maintain their ground, or whether the do not, our duties will + remain the same; our nature, if consulted, will incontestibly prove, that + <i>vice is a decided evil, that virtue is an actual, a substantial good</i>. + </p> + <p> + If, then, there be found atheists who have denied the distinction of good + and evil, or who have dared to strike at the foundations of morality; we + ought to conclude, that upon this point they have reasoned badly; that + they have neither been acquainted with the nature of man, nor known the + true source of his duties; that they have falsely imagined that ethics, as + well as theology, was only an ideal science; that the fleeting systems + once destroyed, there no longer remained any bonds to connect mortals. + Nevertheless, the slightest reflection would have incontestibly proved, + that morality is founded upon immutable relations subsisting between + sensible, intelligent, sociable beings; that without virtue, no society + can maintain itself; that without putting the curb on his desires, no + mortal can conserve himself: man is constrained from his nature to love + virtue, to dread crime, by the same necessity that obliges him to seek + happiness, and fly from sorrow: thus nature compels him to place a + distinction between those objects which please, and those objects Which + injure him. Ask a man, who is sufficiently irrational to deny the + difference between virtue and vice, if it would be indifferent to him to + be beaten, robbed, calumniated, treated with ingratitude, dishonoured by + his wife, insulted by his children, betrayed by his friend? His answer + will prove to you, that whatever he may say, he discriminates the actions + of mankind; that the distinction between good and evil, does not depend + either upon the conventions of men, or upon the ideas which they may have + of particular systems; upon the punishments or upon the recompenses which + attend mortals in a future existence. + </p> + <p> + On the contrary, an atheist, as he is denominated, who should reason with + justness, would feel himself more interested than another in practising + those virtues to which he finds his happiness attached in this world. If + his views do not extend themselves beyond the limits of his present + existence, he must, at least, desire to see his days roll on in happiness + and in peace. Every man, who during the calm of his passions, falls back + upon himself, will feel that his interest invites him to his own + preservation; that his felicity rigorously demands he should take the + necessary means to enjoy life peaceably that it becomes an imperative duty + to himself to keep his actual abode free from alarm; his mind untainted by + remorse. Man oweth something to man, not merely because he would offend + any particular system, if he was to injure his fellow creature; but + because in doing him an injury he would offend a man; would violate the + laws of equity; in the maintenance of which every human being finds + himself interested. + </p> + <p> + We every day see persons who are possessed of great talents, who have very + extensive knowledge, who enjoy very keen penetration, join to these + advantages a very corrupt heart; who lend, themselves to the most hideous + vices: their opinions may be true in some respects, false in a great many + others; their principles may be just, but their inductions are frequently + defective; very often precipitate. A man may embrace sufficient knowledge + to detect some of his errors, yet command too little energy to divest + himself of his vicious propensities. Man is a being whose character + depends upon his organization, modified by habit—upon his + temperament, regulated by education—upon his propensities, + marshalled by example—upon his; passions, guided by his government; + in short, he is only what transitory or permanent circumstances make him: + his superstitious ideas are obliged to yield to this temperament; his + imaginary systems feel a necessity to accommodate themselves to his + propensities; his theories give way to his interests. If the system which + constitutes man an atheist in the eyes of this theologic friend, does not + remove him from the vices with which he was anteriorly tainted, neither + does it tincture him with any new ones; whereas, superstition furnishes + its disciples with a thousand pretexts for committing evil without + repugnance; induces them even to applaud themselves for the commission of + crime. Atheism, at least, leaves men such as they are; it will neither + increase a man's intemperance, nor add to his debaucheries, it will not + render him more cruel than his temperament before invited him to be: + whereas superstition either lacks the rein to the most terrible passions, + gives loose to the most abominable suggestions, or else procures easy + expiations for the most dishonourable vices. "Atheism," says Chancellor + Bacon, "leaves to man reason, philosophy, natural piety, laws, reputation, + and every thing that can serve to conduct him to virtue; but superstition + destroys all these things, and erects itself into a tyranny over the + understandings of men: this is the reason why atheism never disturbs the + government, but renders man more clear-sighted, as seeing nothing beyond + the bounds of this life." The same author adds, "that the times in which + men have turned towards atheism, have been the most tranquil; whereas + superstition has always inflamed their minds, and carried them on to the + greatest disorders; because it infatuates the people with novelties, which + wrest from and carry with them all the authority of government." + </p> + <p> + Men, habituated to meditate, accustomed to make study a pleasure, are not + commonly dangerous citizens: whatever may be their speculations, they + never produce sudden revolutions upon the earth. The winds of the people, + at all times susceptible to be inflamed by the marvellous, their dormant + passions liable to be aroused by enthusiasm, obstinately resist the light + of simple truths; never heat themselves for systems that demand a long + train of reflection—that require the depth of the most acute + reasoning. The system of atheism, as the priests choose to denominate it, + can only be the result of long meditation; the fruit of connected study; + the produce of an imagination cooled by experience: it is the child of + reason. The peaceable Epicurus never disturbed Greece; his philosophy was + publicly taught in Athens during many centuries; he was in incredible + favour with his countrymen, who caused statues to be erected to him; he + had a prodigious number of friends, and his school subsisted for a very + long period. Cicero, although a decided enemy to the Epicureans, gives a + brilliant testimony to the probity both of Epicurus and his disciples, who + were remarkable for the inviolable friendship they bore each other. In the + time of Marcus Aurelius, there was at Athens a public professor of the + philosophy of Epicurus, paid by that emperor, who was himself a stoic. + Hobbes did not cause blood to flow in England, although in his time, + religious fanaticism made a king perish on the scaffold. The poem of + Lucretius caused no civil wars in Rome; the writings of Spinosa did not + excite the same troubles in Holland as the disputes of Gomar and + D'Arminius. In short, we can defy the enemies to human reason to cite a + single example, which proves in a decisive manner that opinions purely + philosophical, or directly contrary to superstition, have ever excited + disturbances in the state. Tumults have generally arisen from theological + notions, because both princes and people have always foolishly believed + they ought to take a part in them. There is nothing so dangerous as that + empty philosophy, which the theologians have combined with their systems. + It is to philosophy, corrupted by priests, that it peculiarly belongs to + blow up the embers of discord; to invite the people to rebellion; to + drench the earth with human blood. There is, perhaps, no theological + question, which has not been the source of immense mischief to man; whilst + all the writings of those denominated atheists, whether ancient or modern, + have never caused any evil but to their authors; whom dominant imposture + has frequently immolated at his deceptive shrine. + </p> + <p> + The principles of atheism are not formed for the mass of the people, who + are commonly under the tutelage of their priests; they are not calculated + for those frivolous capacities, not suited to those dissipated minds, who + fill society with their vices, who hourly afford evidence of their own + inutility; they will not gratify the ambitious; neither are they adapted + to intriguers, nor fitted for those restless beings who find their + immediate interest in disturbing the harmony of the social compact: much + less are they made for a great number of persons, who, enlightened in + other respects, have not sufficient courage to divorce themselves from the + received prejudices. + </p> + <p> + So many causes unite themselves to confirm man in those errors which he + draws in with his mother's milk, that every step that removes him from + these endeared fallacies, costs him uncommon pain. Those persons who are + most enlightened, frequently cling on some side to the general + prepossession. By giving up these revered ideas, we feel ourselves, as it + were, isolated in society: whenever we stand alone in our opinions, we no + longer seem to speak the language of our associates; we are apt to fancy + ourselves placed on a barren, desert island, in sight of a populous, + fruitful country, which we can never reach: it therefore requires great + courage to adopt a mode of thinking that has but few approvers. In those + countries where human knowledge has made some progress; where, besides, a + certain freedom of thinking is enjoyed, may easily be found a great number + of deicolists, theists, or incredulous beings, who, contented with having + trampled under foot the grosser prejudices of the illiterate, have not + dared to go back to the source—to cite the more subtle systems + before the tribunal of reason. If these thinkers did not stop on the road, + reflection would quickly prove to them that those systems which they have + not the fortitude to examine, are equally injurious to sound + ratiocination, fully as revolting to good sense, quite as repugnant to the + evidence of experience, as any of those doctrines, mysteries, fables, or + superstitious customs, of which they have already acknowledged the + futility; they would feel, as we have already proved, that all these + things are nothing more than the necessary consequences of those primitive + errors which man has indulged for so many ages in succession; that in + admitting these errors, they no longer have any rational cause to reject + the deductions which the imagination has drawn from them. A little + attention would distinctly shew them, that it is precisely these errors + that are the true cause of all the evils of society; that those endless + disputes, those sanguinary quarrels, to which superstition and the spirit + of party every instant give birth, are the inevitable effects of the + importance they attach to errors which possess all the means of + distraction, that scarcely ever fail to put the mind of man into a state + of combustion. In short, nothing is more easy than to convince ourselves + that imaginary systems, not reducible to comprehension, which are always + painted under terrific aspects, must act upon the imagination in a very + lively manner, must sooner or later produce disputes—engender + enthusiasm—give birth to fanaticism—end in delirium. + </p> + <p> + Many persons acknowledge, that the extravagances to which superstition + lends activity, are real evils; many complain of the abuse of + superstition, but there are very few who feel that this abuse, together + with the evils, are the necessary consequences of the fundamental + principles of all superstition; which are founded upon the most grievous + notions, which rest themselves on the most tormenting opinions. We daily + see persons undeceived upon superstitious ideas, who nevertheless pretend + that this superstition "is salutary for the people;" that without its + supernatural magic, they could not be kept within due bounds; in other + words, could not be made the voluntary slaves of the priest. But, to + reason thus, is it not to say, poison is beneficial to mankind, that + therefore it is proper to poison them, to prevent them from making an + improper use of their power? Is it not in fact to pretend it is + advantageous to render them absurd; that it is a profitable course to make + them extravagant; wholesome to give them an irrational bias; that they + have need of hobgoblins to blind them; require the most incomprehensible + systems to make them giddy; that it is imperative to submit them either to + impostors or to fanatics, who will avail themselves of their follies to + disturb the repose of the world? Again, is it an ascertained fact, does + experience warrant the conclusion, that superstition has a useful + influence over the morals of the people? It appears much more evident, is + much better borne out by observation, falls more in with the evidence of + the senses, that it enslaves them without rendering them better; that it + constitutes an herd of ignorant beings, whom panic terrors keep under the + yoke of their task-masters; whom their useless fears render the wretched + instruments of towering ambition—of rapacious tyrants; of the subtle + craft of designing priests: that it forms stupid slaves, who are + acquainted with no other virtue, save a blind submission to the most + futile customs, to which they attach a much more substantive value than to + the actual virtues springing out of the duties of morality; or issuing + from the social compact which has never been made known to them. If by any + chance, superstition does restrain some few individuals, it has no effect + on the greater number, who suffer themselves to be hurried along by the + epidemical vices with which they are infected: they are placed by it upon + the stream of corruption, and the tide either sweeps them away, or else, + swelling the waters, breaks through its feeble mounds, and involves the + whole in one undistinguished mass of ruin. It is in those countries where + superstition has the greatest power, that will always be found the least + morality. Virtue is incompatible with ignorance; it cannot coalesce with + superstition; it cannot exist with slavery: slaves can only be kept in + subordination by the fear of punishment; ignorant children are for a + moment intimidated by imaginary terrors. But freemen, the children of + truth, have no fears but of themselves; are neither to be lulled into + submission by visionary duties, nor coerced by fanciful systems; they + yield ready obedience to the evident demonstrations of virtue; are the + faithful, the invulnerable supporters of solid systems; cling with ardour + to the dictates of reason; form impenetrable ramparts round their + legitimate sovereigns; and fix their thrones on an immoveable basis, + unknown to the theologian; that cannot be touched with unhallowed hands; + whose duration will be commensurate with the existence of time itself. To + form freemen, however, to have virtuous citizens, it is necessary to + enlighten them; it is incumbent to exhibit truth to them; it is imperative + to reason with them; it is indispensable to make them feel their + interests; it is paramount to learn them to respect themselves; they must + be instructed to fear shame; they must be excited to have a just idea of + honour; they must be made familiar with the value of virtue, they must be + shewn substantive motives for following its lessons. How can these happy + effects ever be expected from the polluted fountains of superstition, + whose waters do nothing more than degrade mankind? Or how are they to be + obtained from the ponderous, bulky yoke of tyranny, which proposes nothing + more to itself, than to vanquish them by dividing them; to keep them in + the most abject condition by means of lascivious vices, and the most + detestable crimes? + </p> + <p> + The false idea, which so many persons have of the utility of superstition, + which they, at least, judge to be calculated to restrain the + licentiousness of the illiterate, arise from the fatal prejudice that it + is a useful error; that truth may be dangerous. This principle has + complete efficacy to eternize the sorrows of the earth: whoever shall have + the requisite courage to examine these things, will without hesitation + acknowledge, that all the miseries of the human race are to be ascribed to + his errors; that of these, superstitious error must he the most + prejudicial, from the importance which is usually attached to it; from the + haughtiness with which it inspires sovereigns; from the worthless + condition which it prescribes to subjects; from the phrenzy which it + excites among the vulgar. We shall, therefore, be obliged to conclude, + that the superstitious errors of man, rendered sacred by time, are exactly + those which for the permanent interest of mankind, for the well-being of + society, for the security of the monarch himself, demand the most complete + destruction; that it is principally to their annihilation, the efforts of + a sound philosophy ought to be directed. It is not to be feared, that this + attempt will produce either disorders or revolutions: the more freedom + shall accompany the voice of truth, the more convincing it will appear; + although the more simple it shall be, the less it will influence men, who + are only smitten with the marvellous; even those individuals who most + sedulously seek after truth, who pursue it with the greatest ardour, have + frequently an irresistible inclination, that urges them on, and + incessantly disposes them to reconcile error with its antipode. That great + master of the art of thinking, who holds forth to his disciples such able + advice, says, with abundant reason, "that there is nothing but a good and + solid philosophy, which can, like another Hercules, exterminate those + monsters called popular errors: it is that alone which can give freedom to + the human mind." + </p> + <p> + Here is, unquestionably, the true reason why atheism, as it is called, of + which hitherto the principles have not been sufficiently developed, + appears to alarm even those persons who are the most destitute of + prejudice. They find the interval too great between vulgar superstition + and an absolute renunciation of it; they imagine they take a wise medium + in compounding with error; they therefore reject the consequences, while + they admit the principle; they preserve the shadow and throw away the + substance, without foreseeing that, sooner or later, it must, by its + obstetric art, usher into the world, one after another, the same follies + which now fill the heads of bewildered human beings, lost in the + labyrinths of incomprehensible systems. The major part of the incredulous, + the greater number of reformers, do no more than prune a cankered tree, to + whose root they dare not apply the axe; they do not perceive that this + tree will in the end produce the same fruit. Theology, or superstition, + will always be an heap of combustible matter: brooded in the imagination + of mankind, it will always finish by causing the most terrible explosions. + As long as the sacerdotal order shall have the privilege of infecting + youth—of habituating their minds to tremble before unmeaning words—of + alarming nations with the most terrific systems, so long will fanaticism + be master of the human mind; imposture will, at its pleasure, cast the + apple of discord among the members of the state. The most simple error, + perpetually fed, unceasingly modified, continually exaggerated by the + imagination of man, will by degrees assume a collossal figure, + sufficiently powerful to upset every institution; amply competent to the + overthrow of empires. Theism is a system at which the human mind cannot + make a long sojourn; founded upon error, it will, sooner or later, + degenerate into the most absurd, the most dangerous superstition. + </p> + <p> + Many incredulous beings, many theists, are to be met with in those + countries where freedom of opinion reigns; that is to say, where the civil + power has known how to balance superstition. But, above all, atheists as + they are termed, will be found in those nations where, superstition, + backed by the sovereign authority, most enforces the ponderosity of its + yoke; most impresses the volume of its severity; imprudently abuses its + unlimited power. Indeed, when in these kind of countries, science, + talents, the seeds of reflection, are not entirely stifled, the greater + part of the men who think, revolt at the crying abuses of superstition; + are ashamed of its multifarious follies; are shocked at the corruption of + its professors; scandalized at the tyranny of its priests: are struck with + horror at those massive chains which it imposes on the credulous. + Believing with great reason, that they can never remove themselves too far + from its savage principles, the system that serves for the basis of such a + creed, becomes as odious as the superstition itself; they feel that + terrific systems can only be detailed by cruel ministers; these become + detestable objects to every enlightened, to every honest mind, in which + either the love of equity, or the sacred fire of freedom resides; to every + one who is the advocate of humanity—the indignant spurner of + tyranny. Oppression gives a spring to the soul; it obliges man to examine + closely into the cause of his sorrows; misfortune is a powerful incentive, + that turns the mind to the side of truth. How formidable a foe must not + outraged reason be to falsehood? It at least throws it into confusion, + when it tears away its mask; when it follows it into its last + entrenchment; when it proves, beyond contradiction, that <i>nothing is so + dastardly as delusion detected, or tyrannic power held at bay.</i> + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0015" id="link2H_4_0015"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. XIII. + </h2> + <p> + <i>Of the motives which lead to what is falsely called Atheism.—Can + this System be dangerous?—Can it be embraced by the Illiterate?</i> + </p> + <p> + The reflections, as well as the facts which have preceded, will furnish a + reply to those who inquire what interest man has in not admitting + unintelligible systems? The tyrannies, the persecutions, the numberless + outrages committed under these systems; the stupidity, the slavery, into + which their ministers almost every where plunge the people; the sanguinary + disputes to which they give birth; the multitude of unhappy beings with + which their fatal notions fill the world; are surely abundantly sufficient + to create the most powerful, the most interesting motives, to determine + all sensible men, who possess the faculty of thought, to examine into the + authenticity of doctrines, which cause so many serious evils to the + inhabitants of the earth. + </p> + <p> + A theist, very estimable for his talents, asks, "if there can be any other + cause than an evil disposition, which can make men atheists?" I reply to + him, yes, there are other causes. There is the desire, a very laudable + one, of having a knowledge of interesting truths; there is the powerful + interest of knowing what opinions we ought to hold upon the object which + is announced to us as the most important; there is the fear of deceiving + ourselves upon systems which are occupied with the opinions of mankind, + which do not permit he should deceive himself respecting them with + impunity. But when these motives, these causes, should not subsist, is not + indignation, or if they will, an evil disposition, a legitimate cause, a + good and powerful motive, for closely examining the pretensions, for + searching into the rights of systems, in whose name so many crimes are + perpetrated? Can any man who feels, who thinks, who has any elasticity in + his soul, avoid being incensed against austere theories, which are visibly + the pretext, undeniably the source, of all those evils, which on every + side assail the human race? Are they not these fatal systems which are at + once the cause and the ostensible reason of that iron yoke that oppresses + mankind; of that wretched slavery in which he lives; of that blindness + which hides from him his happiness; of that superstition, which disgraces + him; of those irrational customs which torment him; of those sanguinary + quarrels which divide him; of all the outrages which he experiences? Must + not every breast in which humanity is not extinguished, irritate itself + against that theoretical speculation, which in almost every country is + made to speak the language of capricious, inhuman, irrational tyrants? + </p> + <p> + To motives so natural, so substantive, we shall join those which are still + more urgent, more personal to every reflecting man: namely, that benumbing + terror, that incommodious fear, which must be unceasingly nourished by the + idea of capricious theories, which lay man open to the most severe + penalties, even for secret thoughts, over which he himself has not any + controul; that dreadful anxiety arising out of inexorable systems, against + which he may sin without even his own knowledge; of morose doctrines, the + measure of which he can never be certain of having fulfilled; which so far + from being equitable, make all the obligations lay on one side; which with + the most ample means of enforcing restraint, freely permit evil, although + they hold out the most excruciating punishments for the delinquents? Does + it not then, embrace the best interests of humanity, become of the highest + importance to the welfare of mankind, of the greatest consequence to the + quiet of his existence, to verify the correctness of these systems? Can + any thing be more rational than to probe to the core these astounding + theories? Is it possible that any thing can be more just, than to inquire + rigorously into the rights, sedulously to examine the foundations, to try + by every known test, the stability of doctrines, that involve in their + operations, consequences of such colossal magnitude; that embrace, in + their dictatory mandates, matters of such high behest; that implicate the + eternal felicity of such countless millions in the vortex of their action? + Would it not be the height of folly to wear such a tremendous yoke without + inquiry; to let such overwhelming notions pass current unauthenticated; to + permit the soi-disant ministers of these terrific systems to establish + their power, without the most ample verification of their patents of + mission? Would it, I repeat, be at all wonderful, if the frightful + qualities of some of these systems, as exhibited by their official + expounders, whom the accredited functionaries of similar systems, do not + scruple, in the face of day, to brand as impostors, should induce rational + beings to drive them entirely from their hearts; to shake off such an + intolerable burden of misery; to even deny the existence of such appalling + doctrines, of such petrifying systems, which the superstitious themselves, + whilst paying them their homage, frequently curse from the very bottom of + their hearts? + </p> + <p> + The theist, however, will not fail to tell the atheist, as he calls him, + that these systems are not such as superstition paints them; that the + colours are coarse, too glaring, ill assorted, the perspective out of all + keeping; he will then exhibit his own picture, in which the tints are + certainly blended with more mellowness, the colouring of a more pleasing + hue, the whole more harmonious, but the distances equally indistinct: the + atheist, in reply, will say, that superstition itself, with all the absurd + prejudices, all the mischievous notions to which it gives birth, are only + corollaries drawn from the fallacious ideas, from those obscure + principles, which the deicolist himself indulges. That his own + incomprehensible system authorizes the incomprehensible absurdities, the + inconceivable mysteries, with which superstition abounds; that they flow + consecutively from his own premises; that when once the mind of mortals is + bewildered in the dark, inextricable mazes of an ill-directed imagination, + it will incessantly multiply its chimeras. To assure the repose of + mankind, fundamental errors must be annihilated; that he may understand + his true relations, be acquainted with his imperative duties, primary + delusions must be rectified; to procure him that serenity of soul, without + which there can be no substantive happiness, original fallacies must be + undermined. If the systems of the superstitious be revolting, if their + theories be gloomy, if their dogmas are unintelligible, those of the + theist will always be contradictory; will prove fatal, when he shall be + disposed to meditate upon them; will become the source of illusions, with + which, sooner or later, imposture will not omit to abuse his credulity. + Nature alone, with the truths she discovers, is capable of lending to the + human mind that firmness which falsehood will never be able to shake; to + the human heart that self-possession, against which imposture will in vain + direct its attacks. + </p> + <p> + Let us again reply to those who unceasingly repeat that the interest of + the passions alone conduct man to what is termed atheism: that it is the + dread of future punishment that determines corrupt individuals to make the + most strenuous efforts to break up a system they have reason to dread. We + shall, without hesitation, agree that it is the interest of man's passions + which excites him to make inquiries; without interest, no man is tempted + to seek; without passion, no man will seek vigorously. The question, then, + to be examined, is, if the passions and interests, which determine some + thinkers to dive into the stability or the systems held forth to their + adoption, are or are not legitimate? These interests have, already been + exposed, from which it has been proved, that every rational man finds in + his inquietudes, in his fears, reasonable motives to ascertain, whether or + not it be necessary to pass his life in perpetual dread; in never ceasing + agonies? Will it be said, that an unhappy being, unjustly condemned to + groan in chains, has not the right of being willing to render them + asunder; to take some means to liberate himself from his prison; to adopt + some plan to escape from those punishments, which every instant threaten + him? Will it be pretended that his passion for liberty has no legitimate + foundation, that he does an injury to the companions of his misery, in + withdrawing himself from the shafts of tyrannical infliction; or in + furnishing, them also with means to escape from its cruel strokes? Is, + then, an incredulous man, any thing more than one who has taken flight + from the general prison, in which despotic superstition detains nearly all + mankind? Is not an atheist, as he is called, who writes, one who has + broken his fetters, who supplies to those of his associates who have + sufficient courage to follow him, the means of setting themselves free + from the terrors that menace them? The priests unceasingly repeat that it + is pride, vanity, the desire of distinguishing himself from the generality + of mankind, that determines man to incredulity. In this they are like some + of those wealthy mortals, who treat all those as insolent who refuse to + cringe before them. Would not every rational man have a right to ask the + priest, where is thy superiority in matters of reasoning? What motives can + I have to submit my reason to thy delirium? On the other hand, way it not + be said to the hierarchy, that it is interest which makes them priests; + that it is interest which renders them theologians; that it is for the + interest of their passions, to inflate their pride, to gratify their + avarice, to minister to their ambition, &c. that they attach + themselves to systems, of which they alone reap the benefits? Whatever it + may be, the priesthood, contented with exercising their power over the + illiterate, ought to permit those men who do think, to be excused from + bending the knee before their vain, illusive idols. + </p> + <p> + We also agree, that frequently the corruption of morals, a life of + debauchery, a licentiousness of conduct, even levity of mind, may conduct + man to incredulity; but is it not possible to be a libertine, to be + irreligious, to make a parade of incredulity, without being on that + account an atheist? There is unquestionably a difference between those who + are led to renounce belief in unintelligible systems by dint of reasoning, + and those who reject or despise superstition, only because they look upon + it as a melancholy object, or an incommodious restraint. Many persons, no + doubt, renounce received prejudices, through vanity or upon hearsay; these + pretended strong minds have not examined any thing for themselves; they + act upon the authority of others, whom they suppose to have weighed things + more maturely. This kind of incredulous beings, have not, then, any + distinct ideas, any substantive opinions, and are but little capacitated + to reason for themselves; they are indeed hardly in a state to follow the + reasoning of others. They are irreligious in the same manner as the + majority of mankind are superstitious, that is to say, by credulity like + the people; or through interest like the priest. A voluptuary devoted to + his appetites; a debaucheé drowned in drunkenness; an ambitious mortal + given up to his own schemes of aggrandizement; an intriguer surrounded by + his plots; a frivolous, dissipated mortal, absorbed by his gewgaws, + addicted to his puerile pursuits, buried in his filthy enjoyments; a loose + woman abandoned to her irregular desires; a choice spirit of the day: are + these I say, personages, actually competent to form a sound judgment of + superstition, which they have never examined? Are they in a condition to + maturely weigh theories that require the utmost depth of thought? Have + they the capabilities to feel the force of a subtle argument; to compass + the whole of a system: to embrace the various ramifications of an extended + doctrine? If some feeble scintillations occasionally break in upon the + cimmerian darkness of their minds; if by any accident they discover some + faint glimmerings of truth amidst the tumult of their passions; if + occasionally a sudden calm, suspending, for a short season, the tempest of + their contending vices, permits the bandeau of their unruly desires by + which they are blinded, to drop for an instant from their hoodwinked eyes, + these leave on them only evanescent traces; scarcely sooner received than + obliterated. Corrupt men only attack the gods when they conceive them to + be the enemies to their vile passions. Arrian says, "that when men imagine + the gods are in opposition to their passions, they abuse them, and + overturn their altars." The Chinese, I believe, do the same. The honest + man makes war against systems which he finds are inimical to virtue—injurious + to his own happiness—baneful to that of his fellow mortals—contradictory + to the repose, fatal to the interests of the human species. The bolder, + therefore, the sentiments of the honest atheist, the more strange his + ideas, the more suspicious they appear to other men, the more strictly he + ought to observe his own obligations; the more scrupulously he should + perform his duties; especially if he be not desirous that his morals shall + calumniate his system; which duly weighed, will make the necessity of + sound ethics, the certitude of morality, felt in all its force; but which + every species of superstition tends to render problematical, or to + corrupt. + </p> + <p> + Whenever our will is moved by concealed and complicated motives, it is + extremely difficult to decide what determines it; a wicked man may be + conducted to incredulity or to scepticism by those motives which he dare + not avow, even to himself; in believing he seeks after truth, he may form + an illusion to his mind, only to follow the interest of his passions; the + fear of an avenging system will perhaps determine him to deny their + existence without examination; uniformly because he feels them + incommodious. Nevertheless, the passions sometimes happen to be just; a + great interest carries us on to examine things more minutely; it may + frequently make a discovery of the truth, even to him who seeks after it + the least, or who is only desirous to be lulled to sleep, who is only + solicitous to deceive himself. It is the same with a perverse man who + stumbles upon truth, as it is with him, who flying from an imaginary + danger, should encounter in his road a dangerous serpent, which in his + haste he should destroy; he does that by accident, without design, which a + man, less disturbed in his mind, would have done with premeditated + deliberation. + </p> + <p> + To judge properly of things, it is necessary to be disinterested; it is + requisite to have an enlightened mind, to have connected ideas to compass + a great system. It belongs, in fact, only to the honest man to examine the + proofs of systems—to scrutinize the principles of superstition; it + belongs only to the man acquainted with nature, conversant with her ways, + to embrace with intelligence the cause of the SYSTEM OF NATURE. The wicked + are incapable of judging with temper; the ignorant are inadequate to + reason with accuracy; the honest, the virtuous, are alone competent judges + in so weighty an affair. What do I say? Is not the virtuous man, from + thence in a condition to ardently desire the existence of a system that + remunerates the goodness of men? If he renounces those advantages, which + his virtue confers upon him the right to hope, it is, undoubtedly, because + he finds them imaginary. Indeed, every man who reflects will quickly + perceive, that for one timid mortal, of whom these systems restrain the + feeble passions, there are millions whose voice they cannot curb, of whom, + on the contrary, they excite the fury; for one that they console, there + are millions whom they affright, whom they afflict; whom they make + unhappy: in short, he finds, that against one inconsistent enthusiast, + which these systems, which are thought so excellent, render happy, they + carry discord, carnage, wretchedness into vast countries; plunge whole + nations into misery; deluge them with tears. + </p> + <p> + However this may be, do not let us inquire into motives which may + determine a man to embrace a system; let us rather examine the system + itself; let us convince ourselves of its rectitude; if we shall find that + it is founded upon truth, we shall never, be able to esteem it dangerous. + It is always falsehood that is injurious to man; if error be visibly the + source of his sorrows, reason is the true remedy for them; this is the + panacea that can alone carry consolation to his afflictions. Do not let us + farther examine the conduct of a man who presents us with a system; his + ideas, as we have already said, may be extremely sound, when even his + actions are highly deserving of censure. If the system of atheism cannot + make him perverse, who is not so by his temperament, it cannot render him + good, who does not otherwise know the motives that should conduct him to + virtue. At least we have proved, that the superstitious man, when he has + strong passions, when he possesses a depraved heart, finds even in his + creed a thousand pretexts more than the atheist, for injuring the human + species. The atheist has not, at least, the mantle of zeal to cover his + vengeance; he has not the command of his priest to palliate his + transports; he has not the glory of his gods to countenance his fury; the + atheist does not enjoy the faculty of expiating, at the expence of a sum + of money, the transgressions of his life; of availing himself of certain + ceremonies, by the aid of which he may atone for the outrages he may have + committed against society; he has not the advantage of being able to + reconcile himself with heaven, by some easy custom; to quiet the remorse + of his disturbed conscience, by an attention to outward forms: if crime + has not deadened every feeling of his heart, he is obliged continually to + carry within himself an inexorable judge, who unceasingly reproaches him + for his odious conduct; who forces him to blush for his own folly; who + compels him to hate himself; who imperiously obliges him to fear + examination, to dread the resentment of others. The superstitious man, if + he be wicked, gives himself up to crime, which is followed by remorse; but + his superstition quickly furnishes him with the means a getting rid of it; + his life is generally no more than a long series of error and grief, of + sin and expiation, following each other in alternate succession; still + more, he frequently, as we have seen, perpetrates crimes of greater + magnitude, in order to wash away the first. Destitute of any permanent + ideas on morality, he accustoms himself to look upon nothing as criminal, + but that which the ministers, the official expounders of his system, + forbid him to commit: he considers actions of the blackest dye as virtues, + or as the means of effacing those transgressions, which are frequently + held out to him as faithfully executing the duties of his creed. It is + thus we have seen fanatics expiate their adulteries by the most atrocious + persecutions; cleanse their souls from infamy by the most unrelenting + cruelty; make atonement for unjust wars by the foulest means; qualify + their usurpations by outraging every principle of virtue; in order to wash + away their iniquities, bathe themselves in the blood of those + superstitious victims, whose infatuation made them martyrs. + </p> + <p> + An atheist, as he is falsely called, if he has reasoned justly, if he has + consulted nature, hath principles more determinate, more humane, than the + superstitious; his system, whether gloomy or enthusiastic, always conducts + the latter either to folly or cruelty; the imagination of the former will + never be intoxicated to that degree, to make him believe that violence, + injustice, persecution, or assassination are either virtuous or legitimate + actions. We every day see that superstition, or the cause of heaven, as it + is called, hoodwinks even those persons who on every other occasion are + humane, equitable, and rational; so much so, that they make it a paramount + duty to treat with determined barbarity, those men who happen to step + aside from their mode of thinking. An heretic, an incredulous being, + ceases to be a man, in the eyes of the superstitious. Every society, + infected with the venom of bigotry, offers innumerable examples of + juridical assassination, which the tribunals commit without scruple, even + without remorse. Judges who are equitable on every other occasion, are no + longer so when there is a question of theological opinions; in steeping + their hands in the blood of their victims, they believe, on the authority + of the priests, they conform themselves to the views of the Divinity. + Almost every where the laws are subordinate to superstition; make + themselves accomplices in its fanatical fury; they legitimate those + actions most opposed to the gentle voice of humanity; they even transform + into imperative duties, the most barbarous cruelties. The president + Grammont relates, with a satisfaction truly worthy of a cannibal, the + particulars of the punishment of Vanini, who was burned at Thoulouse, + although he had disavowed the opinions with which he was accused; this + president carries his demoniac prejudices so far, as to find wickedness in + the piercing cries, in the dreadful howlings, which torment wrested from + this unhappy victim to superstitious vengeance. Are not all these avengers + of the gods miserable men, blinded by their piety, who, under the + impression of duty, wantonly immolate at the shrine of superstition, those + wretched victims whom the priests deliver over to them? Are they not + savage tyrants, who have the rank injustice to violate thought; who have + the folly to believe they can enslave it? Are they not delirious fanatics, + on whom the law, dictated by the most inhuman prejudices, imposes the + necessity of acting like ferocious brutes? Are not all those sovereigns, + who to gratify the vanity of the priesthood, torment and persecute their + subjects, who sacrifice to their anthropophagite gods human victims, men + whom superstitious zeal has converted into tygers? Are not those priests, + so careful of the soul's health, who insolently break into the sacred + sanctuary of man's mind, to the end that they may find in his opinions + motives for doing him an injury, abominable knaves, disturbers of the + public repose, whom superstition honours, but whom virtue detests? What + villains are more odious in the eyes of humanity, what depredators more + hateful to the eye of reason, than those infamous inquisitors, who by the + blindness of princes, by the delirium of monarchs, enjoy the advantage of + passing judgment on their own enemies; who ruthlessly commit them to the + charity of the flames? Nevertheless, the fatuity of the people makes even + these monsters respected; the favour of kings covers them with kindness; + the mantle of superstitious opinion shields them from the effect of the + just execration of every honest man. Do not a thousand examples prove, + that superstition has every where produced the most frightful ravages: + that it has continually justified the most unaccountable horrors? Has it + not a thousand times armed its votaries with the dagger of the homicide; + let loose passions much wore terrible than those which it pretended to + restrain; broken up the most sacred bonds by which mortals are connected + with each other? Has it not, under the pretext of duty, under the colour + of faith, under the semblance of zeal, under the sacred name of piety, + favoured cupidity, lent wings to ambition, countenanced cruelty, given a + spring to tyranny? Has it not legitimatized murder; given a system to + perfidy; organized rebellion; made a virtue of regicide? Have not those + princes who have been foremost as the avengers of heaven, who have been + the lictors of superstition, frequently themselves become its victims? In + short, has it not been the signal for the most dismal follies, the most + wicked outrages, the most horrible massacres? Has not its altars been + drenched with human gore? Under whatever form it has been exhibited, has + it not always been the ostensible cause of the most bare-faced violation—of + the sacred rights of humanity? + </p> + <p> + Never will an atheist, as he is called, as called, as he enjoys his proper + senses, persuade himself that similar actions can be justifiable; never + will he believe that he who commits them can be an estimable man; there is + no one but the superstitious, whose blindness makes him forget the most + evident principles of morality, whose callous soul renders him deaf to the + voice of nature, whose zeal causes him to overlook the dictates of reason, + who can by any possibility imagine the most destructive crimes are the + most prominent features of virtue. If the atheist be perverse, he, at + least, knows that he acts wrong; neither these systems, nor their priests, + will be able to persuade him that he does right: one thing, however, is + certain, whatever crimes he may allow himself to commit, he will never be + capable of exceeding those which superstition perpetrates without scruple; + that it encourages in those whom it intoxicates with its fury; to whom it + frequently holds forth wickedness itself, either as expiations for + offences, or else as orthodox, meritorious actions. + </p> + <p> + Thus the atheist, however wicked he may be supposed, will at most be upon + a level with the devotee, whose superstition encourages him to commit + crimes, which it transforms into virtue. As to conduct, if he be + debauched, voluptuous, intemperate, adulterous, the atheist in this + differs in nothing from the most credulously superstitious, who frequently + knows how to connect these vices with his credulity, to blend with his + superstition certain atrocities, for which his priests, provided he + renders due homage to their power, especially if he augments their + exchequer, will always find means to pardon him. If he be in Hindoostan, + his brahmins will wash him in the sacred waters of the Ganges, while + reciting a prayer. If he be a Jew, upon making an offering, his sins will + be effaced. If he be in Japan, he will be cleansed by performing a + pilgrimage. If he be a Mahometan, he will be reputed a saint, for having + visited the tomb of his prophet; the Roman pontiff himself will sell him + indulgences; but none of them will ever censure him for those crimes he + may have committed in the support of their several faiths. + </p> + <p> + We are constantly told, that the indecent behaviour of the official + expounders of superstition, the criminal conduct of the priests, or of + their sectaries, proves nothing against the goodness of their systems. + Admitted: but wherefore do they not say the same thing of the conduct of + those whom they call atheists, who, as we have already proved, way have a + very substantive, a very correct system of morality, even while leading a + very dissolute life? If it be necessary to judge the opinions of mankind + according to their conduct, which is the theory that would bear the + scrutiny? Let us, then, examine the opinion of the atheist, without + approving his conduct; let us adopt his mode of thinking, if we find it + marked by the truth; if it shall appear useful; if it shall be proved + rational; but let us reject his mode of action, if that should be found + blameable. At the sight of a work performed with truth, we do not + embarrass ourselves with the morals of the workman: of what importance is + it to the universe, whether the illustrious Newton was a sober, discreet + citizen, or a debauched intemperate man? It only remains for us to examine + his theory; we want nothing more than to know whether he has reasoned + acutely; if his principles be steady; if the parts of his system are + connected; if his work contains more demonstrable truths, than bold ideas? + Let us judge in the same manner of the principles of the atheist; if they + appear strange, if they are unusual, that is a solid reason for probing + them more strictly; if he has spoken truth, if he has demonstrated his + positions, let us yield to the weight of evidence; if he be deceived in + some parts, let us distinguish the true from the false; but do not let us + fall into the hacknied prejudice, which on account of one error in the + detail, rejects a multitude of incontestible truisms. Doctor Johnson, I + think, says in his preface to his Dictionary, "when a man shall have + executed his task with all the accuracy possible, he will only be allowed + to have done his duty; but if he commits the slightest error, a thousand + snarlers are ready to point it out." The atheist, when he is deceived, has + unquestionably as much right to throw his faults on the fragility of his + nature, as the superstitious man. An atheist may have vices, may be + defective, he may reason badly; but his errors will never have the + consequences of superstitious novelties; they will not, like these, kindle + up the fire of discord in the bosom of nations; the atheist will not + justify his vices, defend his wanderings by superstition; he will not + pretend to infallibility, like those self-conceited theologians who attach + the Divine sanction to their follies; who initiate that heaven authorizes + those sophisms, gives currency to those falsehoods, approves those errors, + which they believe themselves warranted to distribute over the face of the + earth. + </p> + <p> + It will perhaps be said, that the refusal to believe in these systems, + will rend asunder one of the most powerful bonds of society, by making the + sacredness of an oath vanish. I reply, that perjury is by no means rare, + even in the most superstitious nations, nor even among the most religious, + or among those who boast of being the most thoroughly convinced of the + rectitude of their theories. Diagoras, superstitious as he was, and it was + not well possible to be more so, it is said became an atheist, on seeing + that the gods did not thunder their vengeance on a man who had taken them + as evidence to a falsity. Upon this principle, how many atheists ought + there to be? From the systems that have made invisible unknown beings the + depositaries of man's engagements, we do not always see it result that + they are better observed; or that the most solemn contracts have acquired + a greater solidity. If history was consulted, it would now and then be in + evidence, that even the conductors of nations, those who have said they + were the images of the Divinity, who have declared that they held their + right of governing immediately from his hands, have sometimes taken the + Deity as the witness to their oaths, have made him the guarantee of their + treaties, without its having had all the effect that might have been + expected, when very trifling interests have intervened; it would appear, + unless historians are incorrect, that they did not always religiously + observe those sacred engagements they made with their allies, much less + with their subjects. To form a judgment from these historic documents, we + should be inclined to say, there have been those who had much + superstition, joined with very little probity; who made a mockery both of + gods and men; who perhaps blushed when they reviewed their own conduct: + nor can this be at all surprising, when it not unfrequently happened that + superstition itself absolved them from their oaths. In fact, does not + superstition sometimes inculcate perfidy; prescribe violation of plighted + faith? Above all, when there is a question of its own interests, does it + not dispense with engagements, however solemn, made with those whom it + condemns? It is, I believe, a maxim in the Romish church, that <i>"no + faith is to be held with heretics."</i> The general council of Constance + decided thus, when, notwithstanding the emperor's passport, it decreed + John Hus and Jerome of Prague to be burnt. The Roman pontiff has, it is + well known, the right of relieving his sectaries from their oaths; of + annulling their vows: this same pontiff has frequently arrogated to + himself the right of deposing kings; of absolving their subjects from + their oaths of fidelity. Indeed, it is rather extraordinary that oaths + should be prescribed, by the laws of those nations which profess + Christianity, seeing that Christ has expressly forbidden the use of them. + If things were considered attentively, it would be obvious that under such + management, superstition and politics are schools of perjury. They render + it common: thus knaves of every description never recoil, when it is + necessary to attest the name of the Divinity to the most manifest frauds, + for the vilest interests. What end, then, do oaths answer? They are + snares, in which simplicity alone can suffer itself to be caught: oaths, + almost every where, are vain formalities, that impose nothing upon + villains; nor do they add any thing to the sacredness of the engagements + of honest men; who would neither have the temerity nor the wish to violate + them; who would not think themselves less bound without an oath. A + perfidious, perjured, superstitious being, has not any advantage over an + atheist, who should fail in his promises: neither the one nor the other + any longer deserves the confidence of their fellow citizens nor the esteem + of good men; if one does not respect his gods, in whom he believes, the + other neither respects his reason, his reputation, nor public opinion, in + which all rational men cannot refuse to believe. Hobbes says, "an oath + adds nothing to the obligation. For a covenant, if lawful, binds in the + sight of God, without the oath, as much as with it: if unlawful, bindeth + not at all: though it be confirmed with an oath." The heathen form was, + "let Jupiter kill me else, as I kill this beast." Adjuration only + augments, in the imagination of him who swears, the fear of violating an + engagement, which he would have been obliged to keep, even without the + ceremony of an oath. + </p> + <p> + It has frequently been asked, if there ever was a nation that had no idea + of the Divinity: and if a people, uniformly composed of atheists, would be + able to subsist? Whatever some speculators may say, it does not appear + likely that there ever has been upon our globe, a numerous people who have + not had an idea of some invisible power, to whom they have shewn marks of + respect and submission: it has been sometimes believed that the Chinese + were atheists: but this is an error, due to the Christian missionaries, + who are accustomed to treat all those as atheists, who do not hold + opinions similar with their own upon Divinity. It always appears that the + Chinese are a people extremely addicted to superstition, but that they are + governed by chiefs who are not so, without however their being atheists + for that reason. If the empire of China be as flourishing as it is said to + be, it at least furnishes a very forcible proof that those who govern have + no occasion to be themselves superstitious, in order to govern with + propriety a people who are so. It is pretended that the Greenlanders have + no idea of the Divinity. Nevertheless, it is difficult to believe it of a + nation so savage. Man, inasmuch as he is a fearful, ignorant animal, + necessarily becomes superstitious in his misfortunes: either he forms gods + for himself, or he admits the gods which others are disposed to give him; + it does not then appear, that we can rationally suppose there may have + been, or that there actually is, a people on the earth a total stranger to + some Divinity. One will shew us the sun, the moon, or the stars; the other + will shew us the sea, the lakes, the rivers, which furnish him his + subsistence, the trees which afford him an asylum against the inclemency + of the weather; another will shew us a rock of an odd form; a lofty + mountain; or a volcano that frequently astonishes him by its emission of + lava; another will present you with his crocodile, whose malignity he + fears; his dangerous serpent, the reptile to which he attributes his good + or bad fortune. In short, each individual will make you behold his + phantasm or his tutelary or domestic gods with respect. + </p> + <p> + But from the existence of his gods, the savage does not draw the same + inductions as the civilized, polished man: the savage does not believe it + a duty to reason continually upon their qualities; he does not imagine + that they ought to influence his morals, nor entirely occupy his thoughts: + content with a gross, simple, exterior worship, he does not believe that + these invisible powers trouble themselves with his conduct towards his + fellow creatures; in short, he does not connect his morality with his + superstition. This morality is coarse, as must be that of all ignorant + people; it is proportioned to his wants, which are few; it is frequently + irrational, because it is the fruit of ignorance; of inexperience; of the + passions of men but slightly restrained, or to say thus, in their infancy. + It is only numerous, stationary, civilized societies, where man's wants + are multiplied, where his interests clash, that he is obliged to have + recourse to government, to laws, to public worship, in order to maintain + concord. It is then, that men approximating, reason together, combine + their ideas, refine their notions, subtilize their theories; it is then + also, that those who govern them avail themselves of invisible powers, to + keep them within bounds, to render them docile, to enforce their + obedience, to oblige them to live peaceably. It was thus, that by degrees, + morals and politics found themselves associated with superstitious + systems. The chiefs of nations, frequently, themselves, the children of + superstition, but little enlightened upon their actual interests; + slenderly versed in sound morality; with an extreme exilty of knowledge on + the actuating motives of the human heart; believed they had effected every + thing requisite for the stability of their own authority; as well as + achieved all that could guarantee the repose of society, that could + consolidate the happiness of the people, in rendering their subjects + superstitious like themselves; by menacing them with the wrath of + invisible powers; in treating them like infants who are appeased with + fables, like children who are terrified by shadows. By the assistance of + these marvellous inventions, to which even the chiefs, the conductors of + nations, are themselves frequently the dupes; which are transmitted as + heirlooms from race to race; sovereigns were dispensed from the trouble of + instructing themselves in their duties; they in consequence neglected the + laws, enervated themselves in luxurious ease, rusted in sloth; followed + nothing but their caprice: the care of restraining their subjects was + reposed in their deities; the instruction of the people was confided to + their priests, who were commissioned to train them to obedience, to make + them submissive, to render them devout, to teach them at an early age to + tremble under the yoke of both the visible and invisible gods. + </p> + <p> + It was thus that nations, kept by their tutors in a perpetual state of + infancy, were only restrained by vain, chimerical theories. It was thus + that politics, jurisprudence, education, morality, were almost every where + infected with superstition; that man no longer knew any duties, save those + which grew out of its precepts: the ideas of virtue were thus falsely + associated with those of imaginary systems, to which imposture generally + gave that language which was most conducive to its own immediate + interests: mankind thus fully persuaded, that without these marvellous + systems, there could not exist any sound morality, princes, as well as + subjects, equally blind to their actual interests, to the duties of + nature, to their reciprocal rights, habituated themselves to consider + superstition as necessary to mortals—as indispensibly requisite to + govern men—as the most effectual method of preserving power—as + the most certain means of attaining happiness. + </p> + <p> + It is from these dispositions, of which we have so frequently demonstrated + the fallacy, that so many persons, otherwise extremely enlightened, look + upon it as an impossibility that a society formed of atheists, as they are + termed, could subsist for any length of time. It does not admit a + question, that a numerous society, who should neither have religion, + morality, government, laws, education, nor principles, could not maintain + itself; that it would simply congregate beings disposed to injure each + other, or children who would follow nothing but the blindest impulse; but + then is it not a lamentable fact, that with all the superstition that + floats in the world, the greater number of human societies are nearly in + this state? Are not the sovereigns of almost every country in a continual + state of warfare with their subjects? Are not the people, in despite of + their superstition, not withstanding the terrific notions which it holds + forth, unceasingly occupied with reciprocally injuring each other; with + rendering themselves mutually unhappy? Does not superstition itself, with + its supernatural notions, unremittingly flatter the vanity of monarchs, + unbridle the passions of princes, throw oil into the fire of discord, + which it kindles between those citizens who are divided in their opinion? + Could those infernal powers, who are supposed to be ever on the alert to + mischief mankind, be capable of inflicting greater evils upon the human + race than spring from fanaticism, than arise out of the fury to which + theology gives birth? Could atheists, however irrational they may be + supposed, if assembled together in society, conduct themselves in a more + criminal manner? In short, is it possible they could act worse than the + superstitious, who, saturated with the most pernicious vices, guided by + the most extravagant systems, during so many successive ages, have done + nothing more than torment themselves with the most cruel inflictions; + savagely cut each other's throats, without a shadow of reason; make a + merit of mutual extermination? It cannot be pretended they would. On the + contrary, we boldly assert, that a community of atheists, as the + theologian calls them, because they cannot fall in with his mysteries, + destitute of all superstition, governed by wholesome laws, formed by a + salutary education, invited to the practice of virtue by instantaneous + recompences, deterred from crime by immediate punishments, disentangled + from illusive theories, unsophisticated by falsehood, would be decidedly + more honest, incalculably more virtuous, than those superstitious + societies, in which every thing contributes to intoxicate the mind; where + every thing conspires to corrupt the heart. + </p> + <p> + When we shall be disposed usefully to occupy ourselves with the happiness + of mankind, it is with superstition that the reform must commence; it is + by abstracting these imaginary theories, destined to affright the + ignorant, who are completely in a state of infancy, that we shall be able + to promise ourselves the desirable harvest of conducting man to a state of + maturity. It cannot be too often repeated, there can be no morality + without consulting the nature of man, without studying his actual + relations with the beings of his own species; there can be no fixed + principle for man's conduct, while it is regulated upon unjust theories; + upon capricious doctrines; upon corrupt systems; there can be no sound + politics without attending to human temperament, without contemplating him + as a being associated for the purpose of satisfying his wants, + consolidating his happiness, and assuring its enjoyment. No wise + government can found itself upon despotic systems; they will always make + tyrants of their representatives. No laws can be wholesome, that do not + bottom themselves upon the strictest equity; which have not for their + object the great end of human society. No jurisprudence can be + advantageous for nations, if its administration be regulated by capricious + systems, or by human passions deified. No education can be salutary, + unless it be founded upon reason; to be efficacious to its proposed end, + it must neither be construed upon chimerical theories, nor upon received + prejudices. In short, there can be no probity, no talents, no virtue, + either under corrupt masters, or under the conduct of those priests who + render man the enemy to himself—the determined foe to others; who + seek to stifle in his bosom the germ of reason; who endeavour to smother + science, or who try to damp his courage. + </p> + <p> + It will, perhaps, be asked, if we can reasonably flatter ourselves with + ever reaching the point to make a whole people entirely forget their + superstitious opinions; or abandon the ideas which they have of their + gods? I reply, that the thing appears utterly impossible; that this is not + the end we can propose to ourselves. These ideas, inculcated from the + earliest ages, do not appear of a nature to admit eradication from the + mind of the majority of mankind: it would, perhaps be equally arduous to + give them to those persons, who, arrived at a certain time of life, should + never have heard them spoken of, as to banish them from the minds of + those, who have been imbued with them from their tenderest infancy. Thus, + it cannot be reckoned possible to make a whole nation pass from the abyss + of superstition, that is to say, from the bosom of ignorance, from the + ravings of delirium, into absolute naturalism, or as the priests of + superstition would denominate it, into atheism; which supposes reflection—requires + intense study—demands extensive knowledge—exacts a long series + of experience—includes the habit of contemplating nature—the + faculty of observing her laws; which, in short, embraces the expansive + science of the causes producing her various phenomena; her multiplied + combinations, together with the diversified actions of the beings she + contains, as well as their numerous properties. In order to be an atheist, + or to be assured of the capabilities of nature, it is imperative to have + meditated her profoundly: a superficial glance of the eye will not bring + man acquainted with her resources; optics but little practised on her + powers, will unceasingly be deceived; the ignorance of actual causes will + always induce the supposition of those which are imaginary; credulity + will, thus re-conduct the natural philosopher himself to the feet of + superstitious phantoms, in which either his limited vision, or his + habitual sloth, will make him believe he shall find the solution to every + difficulty. + </p> + <p> + Atheism, then, as well as philosophy, like all profound abstruse sciences, + is not calculated for the vulgar; neither is it suitable to the great mass + of mankind. There are, in all populous, civilized nations, persons whose + circumstances enable them to devote their time to meditation, whose easy + finances afford them leisure to make deep researches into the nature of + things, who frequently make useful discoveries, which, sooner or later, + after they have been submitted to the infallible test of experience, when + they have passed the fiery ordeal of truth, extend widely their salutary + effects, become extremely beneficial to society, highly advantageous to + individuals. The geometrician, the chemist, the mechanic, the natural + philosopher, the civilian, the artizan himself, are industriously + employed, either in their closets, or in their workshops, seeking the + means to serve society, each in his sphere: nevertheless, not one of their + sciences or professions are familiar to the illiterate; not one of the + arts with which they are respectively occupied, are known to the + uninitiated: these, however, do not fail, in the long run, to profit by + them, to reap substantive advantages from those labours, of which they + themselves have no idea. It is for the mariner, that the astronomer + explores his arduous science; it is for him the geometrician calculates; + for his use the mechanic plies his craft: it is for the mason, for the + carpenter, for the labourer, that the skilful architect studies his + orders, lays down well-proportioned elaborate plans. Whatever may be the + pretended utility of Pneumatology, whatever may be the vaunted advantages + of superstitious opinions, the wrangling polemic, the subtle theologian, + cannot boast either of toiling, of writing, or of disputing for the + advantage of the people, whom, notwithstanding, he contrives to tax, very + exorbitantly, for those systems they can never understand; from whom he + levies the most oppressive contributions, as a remuneration for the detail + of those mysteries, which under any possible circumstances, cannot, at any + time whatever, be of the slightest benefit to them. It is not, then, for + the multitude that a philosopher should propose to himself, either to + write or to meditate: the Code of Nature, or the principles of atheism, as + the priest calls it, are not, as we have shewn, even calculated for the + meridian of a great number of persons, who are frequently too much + prepossessed in favour of the received prejudices, although extremely + enlightened on other points. It is extremely rare to find men, who, to an + enlarged mind, extensive knowledge, great talents, join either a well + regulated imagination, or the courage necessary to successfully oppugn + habitual errors; triumphantly to attack those chimerical systems, with + which the brain has been inoculated from the first hour of its birth. A + secret bias, an invincible inclination, frequently, in despite of all + reasoning, re-conducts the most comprehensive, the best fortified, the + most liberal minds, to those prejudices which have a wide-spreading + establishment; of which they have themselves taken copious draughts during + the early stages of life. Nevertheless, those principles, which at first + appear strange, which by their boldness seem revolting, from which + timidity flies with trepidation, when they have the sanction of truth, + gradually insinuate themselves into the human mind, become familiar to its + exercise, extend their happy influence on every side, and finally produce + the most substantive advantages to society. In time, men habituate + themselves to ideas which originally they looked upon as absurd; which on + a superficial glance they contemplated as either noxious or irrational: at + least, they cease to consider those as odious, who profess opinions upon + subjects on which experience makes it evident they may be permitted to + have doubts, without imminent danger to public tranquillity. + </p> + <p> + Then the diffusion of ideas among mankind is not an event to be dreaded: + if they are truths, they will of necessity be useful: by degrees they will + fructify. The man who writes, must neither fix his eyes upon the time in + which he lives, upon his actual fellow citizens, nor upon the country he + inhabits. He must speak to the human race; he must instruct future + generations; he must extend his views into the bosom of futurity; in vain + he will expect the eulogies of his contemporaries; in vain will he flatter + himself with seeing his reasoning adopted; in vain he will soothe himself + with the pleasing reflection, that his precocious principles will be + received with kindness; if he has exhibited truisms, the ages that shall + follow will do justice to his efforts; unborn nations shall applaud his + exertions; his future countrymen shall crown his sturdy attempts with + those laurels, which interested prejudice withholds from him in his own + days; it must therefore be from posterity, he is to expect the need of + applause due to his services; the present race is hermetically sealed + against him: meantime let him content himself with having done well; with + the secret suffrages of those few friends to veracity who are so thinly + spread over the surface of the earth. It is after his death, that the + trusty reasoner, the faithful writer, the promulgator of sterling + principles, the child of simplicity, triumphs; it is then that the stings + of hatred, the shafts of envy, the arrows of malice, either exhausted or + blunted, enable mankind to judge with impartiality; to yield to + conviction; to establish eternal truth upon its own imperishable altars, + which from its essence must survive all the error of the earth. It is then + that calumny, crushed like the devouring snail by the careful gardener, + ceases to besmear the character of an honest man, while its venomous + slime, glazed by the sun, enables the observant spectator to trace the + filthy progress it had made. + </p> + <p> + It is a problem with many people, <i>if truth may not be injurious?</i> + The best intentioned persons are frequently in great doubt upon this + important point. The fact is, <i>it never injures any but those who + deceive mankind</i>: this has, however, the greatest interest in being + undeceived. Truth may be injurious to the individual who announces it, but + it can never by any possibility harm the human species; never can it be + too distinctly presented to beings, always either little disposed to + listen to its dictates, or too slothful to comprehend its efficacy. If all + those who write to publish important truths, which, of all others, are + ever considered the most dangerous, were sufficiently ardent for the + public welfare to speak freely, even at the risk of displeasing their + readers, the human race would be much more enlightened, much happier than + it now is. To write in ambiguous terms, is very frequently to write to + nobody. The human mind is idle; we must spare it, as much as possible, the + trouble of reflection; we must relieve it from the embarrassment of + intense thinking. What time does it not consume, what study does it not + require, at the present day, to unravel the amphibological oracles of the + ancient philosophers, whose actual sentiments are almost entirely lost to + the present race of men? If truth be useful to human beings, it is an + injustice to deprive them of its advantages; if truth ought to be + admitted, we must admit its consequences, which are also truths. Man, + taken generally, is fond of truth, but its consequences often inspire him + with so much dread, so alarm his imbecility, that, frequently, he prefers + remaining in error, of which a confirmed habit prevents him from feeling + the deplorable effects. Besides, we shall say with Hobbes, "that we cannot + do men any harm by proposing truth to them; the worst mode is to leave + them in doubt, to let them remain in dispute." If an author who writes be + deceived, it is because he may have reasoned badly. Has he laid down false + principles? It remains to examine them. Is his system fallacious? Is it + ridiculous? It will serve to make truth appear with the greatest splendor: + his work will fall into contempt; the writer, if he be witness to its + fall, will be sufficiently punished for his temerity; if he be defunct, + the living cannot disturb his ashes. No man writes with a design to injure + his fellow creatures; he always proposes to himself to merit their + suffrages, either by amusing them, by exciting their curiosity, or by + communicating to them discoveries, which he believes useful. Above all, no + work can be really dangerous, if it contains truth. It would not be so, + even if it contained principles evidently contrary to experience—opposed + to good sense. Indeed, what would result from a work that should now tell + us the sun is not luminous; that parricide is legitimate; that robbery is + allowable; that adultery is not a crime? The smallest reflection would + make us feet the falsity of these principles; the whole human race would + protest against them. Men would laugh at the folly of the author; + presently his book, together with his name, would be known only by its + ridiculous extravagancies. There is nothing but superstitious follies that + are pernicious to mortals; and wherefore? It is because authority always + pretends to establish them by violence; to make them pass for substantive + virtues; rigorously punishes those who shall be disposed to smile at their + inconsistency, or examine into their pretensions. If man was more + rational, he would examine superstitious opinions as he examines every + thing else; he would look upon theological theories with the same eyes + that he contemplates systems of natural philosophy, or problems in + geometry: the latter never disturbs the repose of society, although they + sometimes excite very warm disputes in the learned world. Theological + quarrels would never be attended with any evil consequences, if man could + gain the desirable point of making those who exercise power, feel that the + disputes of persons, who do not themselves understand the marvellous + questions upon which they never cease wrangling, ought not to give birth + to any other sensations than those of indifference; to rouse no other + passion than that of contempt. + </p> + <p> + It is, at least, this indifference not speculative theories, so just, so + rational, so advantageous for states, that sound philosophy may propose to + introduce, gradually, upon the earth. Would not the human race be much + happier—if the sovereigns of the world, occupied with the welfare of + their subjects, leaving to superstitious theologians their futile + contests, making their various systems yield to healthy politics; obliged + these haughty ministers to become citizens; carefully prevented their + disputes from interrupting the public tranquillity? What advantage might + there not result to science; what a start would be given to the progress + of the human mind, to the cause of sound morality, to the advancement of + equitable jurisprudence, to the improvement of legislation, to the + diffusion of education, from an unlimited freedom of thought? At present, + genius every where finds trammels; superstition invariably opposes itself + to its course; man, straitened with bandages, scarcely enjoys the free use + of any one of his faculties; his mind itself is cramped; it appears + continually wrapped up in the swaddling clothes of infancy. The civil + power, leagued with spiritual domination, appears only disposed to rule + over brutalized slaves, shut up in a dark prison, where they reciprocally + goad each other with the efferverscence of their mutual ill humour. + Sovereigns, in general, detest liberty of thought, because they fear + truth; this appears formidable to them, because it would condemn their + excesses; these irregularities are dear to them, because they do not, + better than their subjects, understand their true interests; properly + considered, these ought to blend themselves into one uniform mass. + </p> + <p> + Let not the courage of the philosopher, however, be abated by so many + united obstacles, which would appear for ever to exclude truth from its + proper dominion; to banish reason from the mind of man; to spoil nature of + her imprescriptible rights. The thousandth part of those cares which are + bestowed to infect the human mind, would be amply sufficient to make it + whole. Let us not, then, despair of the case: do not let us do man the + injury to believe that truth is not made for him; his mind seeks after it + incessantly; his heart desires it faithfully; his happiness demands it + with an imperious voice; he only either fears it, or mistakes it, because + superstition, which has thrown all his ideas into confusion, perpetually + keeps the bandeau of delusion fast bound over his eyes; strives, with an + almost irresistible force, to render him an entire stranger to virtue. + </p> + <p> + Maugre the prodigious exertions that are made to drive truth from the + earth; in spite of the extraordinary pains used to exile reason—of + the uninterrupted efforts to expel true science from the residence of + mortals; time, assisted by the progressive knowledge of ages, may one day + be able to enlighten even those princes who are the most outrageous in + their opposition to the illumination of the human mind; who appear such + decided enemies to justice, so very determined against the liberties of + mankind. Destiny will, perhaps, when least expected, conduct these + wandering outcasts to the throne of some enlightened, equitable, + courageous, generous, benevolent sovereign, who, smitten with the charms + of virtue, shall throw aside duplicity, frankly acknowledge the true + source of human misery, and apply to it those remedies with which wisdom + has furnished him: perhaps he may feel, that those systems, from whence it + is pretended he derives his power, are the true scourges of his people; + the actual cause of his own weakness: that the official expounders of + these systems are his most substantial enemies—his most formidable + rivals; he may find that superstition, which he has been taught to look + upon as the main support to his authority, in point of fact only enfeebles + it—renders it tottering: that superstitious morality, false in its + principles, is only calculated to pervert his subjects; to break down + their intrepidity; to render them perfidious; in short, to give them the + vices of slaves, in lieu of the virtues of citizens. A prince thus + disentangled from prejudice, will perhaps behold, in superstitious errors, + the fruitful source of human sorrows, and commiserations, the condition of + his race, it may be, will generously declare, that they are incompatible + with every equitable administration. + </p> + <p> + Until this epoch, so desirable for humanity, shall arrive, the principles + of naturalism will be adopted only by a small number of liberal-minded + men, who shall dive below the surface; these cannot flatter themselves + either with making proselytes, or having a great number of approvers: on + the contrary, they will meet with zealous adversaries, with ardent + contemners, even in those persons who upon every other subject discover + the most acute minds; display the most consummate knowledge. Those men who + possess the greatest share of ability, as we have already observed, cannot + always resolve to divorce themselves completely from their superstitious + ideas; imagination, so necessary to splendid talents, frequently forms in + them an insurmountable obstacle to the total extinction of prejudice; this + depends much more upon the judgment than upon the mind. To this + disposition, already so prompt to form illusions to them, is also to be + joined the force of habit; to a great number of men, it would he wresting + from them a portion of themselves to take away their superstitious + notions; it would be depriving them of an accustomed aliment; plunging + them into a dreadful vacuum: obliging their distempered minds to perish + for want of exercise. Menage remarks, "that history speaks of very few + incredulous women, or female atheists:" this is not surprising; their + organization renders them fearful; their nervous system undergoes + periodical variations; the education they receive disposes them to + credulity. Those among them who have a sound constitution, who have a well + ordered imagination, have occasion for chimeras suitable to occupy their + leisure; above all, when the world abandons them, then superstitious + devotion, with its attractive ceremonies, becomes either a business or an + amusement. + </p> + <p> + Let us not be surprised, if very intelligent, extremely learned men, + either obstinately shut their eyes, or run counter to their ordinary + sagacity, every time there is a question respecting an object which they + have not the courage to examine with that attention they lend to many + others. Lord Chancellor Bacon pretends, "that a little philosophy disposes + men to atheism, but that great depth re-conducts them to religion." If we + analyze this proposition, we shall find it signifies, that even moderate, + indifferent thinkers, are quickly enabled to perceive the gross + absurdities of superstition; but that very little accustomed to meditate, + or else destitute of those fixed principles which could serve them for a + guide, their imagination presently replaces them in the theological + labyrinth, from whence reason, too weak for the purpose, appeared disposed + to withdraw them: these timid souls, who fear to take courage, with minds + disciplined to be satisfied with theological solutions, no longer see in + nature any thing but an inexplicable enigma; an abyss which it is + impossible for them to fathom: these, habituated to fix their eyes upon an + ideal, mathematical point, which they have made the centre of every thing, + whenever they lose sight of it, find the universe becomes an + unintelligible jumble to them; then the confusion in which they feel + themselves involved, makes them rather prefer returning to the prejudices + of their infancy, which appear to explain every thing, than to float in + the vacuum, or quit a foundation which they judge to be immoveable. Thus + the proposition of Bacon should seem, to indicate nothing, except it be + that the most experienced persons cannot at all times defend themselves + against the illusions of their imagination; the impetuosity of which + resists the strongest reasoning. + </p> + <p> + Nevertheless, a deliberate study of nature is sufficient to undeceive + every man who will calmly consider things: he will discover that the + phenomena of the world is connected by links, invisible to superficial + notice, equally concealed from the too impetuous observer, but extremely + intelligible to him who views her with serenity. He will find that the + most unusual, the most marvellous, as well as the most trifling, or + ordinary effects, are equally inexplicable, but that they all equally flow + from natural causes; that supernatural causes, under whatever name they + way be designated, with whatever qualities they may be decorated, will + never do more than increase difficulties; will only make chimeras + multiply. The simplest observation will incontestibly prove to him that + every thing is necessary; that all the effects he perceives are material; + that they can only originate in causes of the same nature, when he even + shall not be able to recur to them by the assistance of his senses. Thus + his mind, properly directed, every where show him nothing but matter, + sometimes acting in a manner which his organs permit him to follow, at + others in a mode imperceptible by the faculties he possesses: he will see + that all beings follow constant invariable laws, by which all combinations + are united and destroyed; he will find that all forms change, but that, + nevertheless, the great whole ever remains the same. Thus, cured of the + idle notions with which he was imbued, undeceived in those erroneous + ideas, which from habit be attached to imaginary systems, he will + cheerfully consent to be ignorant of whatever his organs do not enable him + to compass; he will know that obscure terms, devoid of sense, are not + calculated to explain difficulties; guided by reason, he will throw aside + all hypothesis of the imagination; the champion of rectitude, he will + attach himself to realities, which are confirmed by experience, which are + evidenced by truth. + </p> + <p> + The greater number of those who study nature, frequently do not consider, + that prejudiced eyes will never discover more than that which they have + previously determined to find: as soon as they perceive facts contrary to + their own ideas, they quickly turn aside, and believe their visual organs + have deceived them; if they return to the task, it is in hopes to find + means by which they may reconcile the facts to the notions with which + their own mind is previously tinctured. Thus we find enthusiastic + philosophers, whose determined prepossession shews them what they + denominate incontestible evidences of the systems with which they are + pre-occupied, even in those things, that most openly contradict their + hypothesis: hence those pretended demonstrations of the existence of + theories, which are drawn from final causes—from the order of nature—from + the kindness evinced to man, &c. Do these same enthusiasts perceive + disorder, witness calamities? They induct new proofs of the wisdom, fresh + evidence of the intelligence, additional testimony to the bounty of their + system, whilst all these occurrences as visibly contradict these + qualities, as the first seem to confirm or to establish them. These + prejudiced observers are in an ecstacy at the sight of the periodical + motions of the planets; at the order of the stars; at the various + productions of the earth; at the astonishing harmony in the component + parts of animals: in that moment, however, they forget the laws of motion; + the powers of gravitation; the force of attraction and repulsion; they + assign all these striking phenomena to unknown causes, of which they have + no one substantive idea. In short, in the fervor of their imagination they + place man in the centre of nature; they believe him to be the object, the + end, of all that exists; that it is for his convenience every thing is + made; that it is to rejoice his mind, to pleasure his senses, that the + whole was created; whilst they do not perceive, that very frequently the + entire of nature appears to be loosed against his weakness; that the + elements themselves overwhelm him with calamity; that destiny obstinately + persists in rendering him the most miserable of beings. The progress of + sound philosophy will always be fatal to superstition, whose notions will + be continually contradicted by nature. + </p> + <p> + Astronomy has caused judiciary astrology to vanish; experimental + philosophy, the study of natural history and chemistry, have rendered it + impossible for jugglers, priests or sorcerers, any longer to perform + miracles. Nature, profoundly studied, must necessarily cause the overthrow + of those chimerical theories, which ignorance has substituted to her + powers. + </p> + <p> + Atheism, as it is termed, is only so rare, because every thing conspires + to intoxicate man with a dazzling enthusiasm, from his most tender age; to + inflate him from his earliest infancy, with systematic error, with + organized ignorance, which of all others is the most difficult to + vanquish, the most arduous to root out. Theology is nothing more than a + science of words, which by dint of repetition we accustom ourselves to + substitute for things: as soon as we feel disposed to analyze them, we are + astonished to find they do not present us with any actual sense. There + are, in the whole world, very few men who think deeply: who render to + themselves a faithful account of their own ideas; who have keen + penetrating minds. Justness of intellect is one of the rarest gifts which + nature bestows on the human species. It is not, however, to be understood + by this, that nature has any choice in the formation of her beings; it is + merely to be considered, that the circumstances very rarely occur which + enable the junction of a certain quantity of those atoms or parts, + necessary to form the human machine in such due proportions, that one + disposition shall not overbalance the others; and thus render the judgment + erroneous, by giving it a particular bias. We know the general process of + making gunpowder; nevertheless, it will sometimes happen that the + ingredients have been so happily blended, that this destructive article is + of a superior quality to the general produce of the manufactory, without, + however, the chemist being on that account entitled to any particular + commendation; circumstances have been decidedly favorable, and these + seldom occur. Too lively an imagination, an over eager curiosity, are as + powerful obstacles to the discovery of truth, as too much phlegm, a slow + conception, indolence of mind, or the want of a thinking habit: all men + have more or less imagination, curiosity, phlegm, bile, indolence, + activity: it is from the happy equilibrium which nature has observed in + their organization, that depends that invaluable blessing, correctness of + mind. Nevertheless, as we have heretofore said, the organic structure of + man is subject to change; the accuracy of his mind varies with the + mutations of his machine: from hence may be traced those almost perpetual + revolutions that take place in the ideas of mortals; above all when there + is a question concerning those objects, upon which experience does not + furnish any fixed basis whereon to rest their merits. + </p> + <p> + To search after right, to discover truth, requires a keen, penetrating, + just, active mind; because every thing strives to conceal from us its + beauties: it needs an upright heart, one in good faith with itself, joined + to an imagination tempered with reason, because our habitual fears make us + frequently dread its radiance, sometimes bursting like a meteor on our + darkened faculties; besides, it not unfrequently happens, that we are + actually the accomplices of those who lead us astray, by an inclination we + too often manifest to dissimilate with ourselves on this important + measure. Truth never reveals itself either to the enthusiast smitten with + his own reveries; to the fellifluous fanatic enslaved by his prejudices; + to the vain glorious mortal puffed up with his own presumptuous ignorance; + to the voluptuary devoted to his pleasures; or to the wily reasoner, who, + disingenuous with himself, has a peculiar spontaneity to form illusions to + his mind. Blessed, however, with a heart, gifted with a mind such as + described, man will surely discover this <i>rara avis:</i> thus + constituted, the attentive philosopher, the geometrician, the moralist, + the politician, the theologian himself, when he shall sincerely seek + truth, will find that the corner-stone which serves for the foundation of + all superstitious systems, is evidently rested upon fiction. The + philosopher will discover in matter a sufficient cause for its existence; + he will perceive that its motion, its combination, its modes of acting, + are always regulated by general laws, incapable of variation. The + geometrician, without quiting nature, will calculate the active force of + matter; it will then become obvious to him, that to explain its phenomena, + it is by no means necessary to have recourse to that which is + incommensurable with all known powers. The politician, instructed in the + true spring which can act upon the mind of nations, will feel distinctly, + that it is not imperative to recur to imaginary theories, whilst there are + actual motives to give play to the volition of the citizens; to induce + them to labour efficaciously to the maintenance of their association; he + will readily acknowledge that fictitious systems are calculated either to + slaken the exertions, or to disturb the motion of so complicated a machine + an human society. He who shall more honor truth than the vain subtilities + of theology, will quickly perceive that this pompous science is nothing + more than an unintelligible jumble of false hypothesis; that it + continually begs its principles; is full of sophisms; contains only + vitiated circles; embraces the most subdolous distinctions; is ushered to + mankind by the most disingenuous arguments, from which it is not possible, + under any given circumstances, there should result any thing but + puerilities—the most endless disputes. In short, all men who have + sound ideas of morality, whose notions of virtue are correct, who + understand what is useful to the human being in society, whether it be to + conserve himself individually, or the body of which he is a member, will + acknowledge, that in order to discover his relations, to ascertain his + duties, he has only to consult his own nature; that he ought to be + particularly careful neither to found them upon discrepant systems, nor to + borrow them from models that never can do more than disturb his mind; that + will only render his conduct fluctuating; that will leave him for ever + uncertain of its proper character. + </p> + <p> + Thus, every rational thinker, who renounces his prejudices, will be + enabled to feel the inutility, to comprehend the fallacy of so many + abstract systems; he will perceive that they have hitherto answered no + other purpose than to confound the notions of mankind; to render doubtful + the clearest truths. In quitting the regions of the empyreum, where his + mind can only bewilder itself, in re-entering his proper sphere, in + consulting reason, man will discover that of which he needs the knowledge; + he will be able to undeceive himself upon those chimerical theories, which + enthusiasm has substituted for actual natural causes; to detect those + figments, by which imposture has almost every where superseded the real + motives that can give activity in nature; out of which the human mind + never rambles, without going woefully astray; without laying the + foundation of future misery. + </p> + <p> + The Deicolists, as well as the theologians, continually reproach their + adversaries with their taste for paradoxes—with their attachment to + systems; whilst they themselves found all their reasoning upon imaginary + hypothesis—upon visionary theories; make a principle of submitting + their understanding to the yoke of authority; of renouncing experience; of + setting down as nothing the evidence of their senses. Would it not be + justifiable in the disciples of nature, to say to these men, who thus + despise her, "We only assure ourselves of that which we see; we yield to + nothing but evidence; if we have a system, it is one founded upon facts; + we perceive in ourselves, we behold every where else, nothing but matter; + we therefore conclude from it that matter can both feel and think: we see + that the motion of the universe is operated after mechanical laws; that + the whole results from the properties, is the effect of the combination, + the immediate consequence of the modification of matter; thus, we are + content, we seek no other explication of the phenomena which nature + presents. We conceive only an unique world, in which every thing is + connected; where each effect is linked to a natural cause, either known or + unknown, which it produces according to necessary laws; we affirm nothing + that is not demonstrable; nothing that you are not obliged to admit as + well as ourselves: the principles we lay down are distinct: they are + self-evident: they are facts. If we find some things unintelligible, if + causes frequently become arduous, we ingenuously agree to their obscurity; + that is to say, to the limits of our own knowledge. But in order to + explain these effects, we do not imagine an hypothesis; we either consent + to be for ever ignorant of them, or else we wait patiently until time, + experience, with the progress of the human mind, shall throw them into + light: is not, then, our manner of philosophizing consistent with truth? + Indeed, in whatever we advance upon the subject of nature, we proceed + precisely in the same manner as our opponents themselves pursue in all the + other sciences, such as natural history, experimental philosophy, + mathematics, chemistry, &c. We scrupulously confine ourselves to what + comes to our knowledge through the medium of our senses; the only + instruments with which nature has furnished us to discover truth. What is + the conduct of our adversaries? In order to expound things of which they + are ignorant, they imagine theories still more incomprehensible than what + they are desirous to explain; theories of which they themselves are + obliged to acknowledge they have not the most slender notion. Thus they + invert the true principles of logic, which require we should proceed + gradually from that which is most known, to that with which we are least + acquainted. Again, upon what do they found the existence of these + theories, by whose aid they pretend to solve all difficulties? It is upon + the universal ignorance of mankind; upon the inexperience of man; upon his + fears; upon his disordered imagination; upon a pretended <i>intimate sense</i>, + which in reality is nothing more than the effect of vulgar prejudice; the + result of dread; the consequence of the want of a reflecting habit, which + induces them to crouch to the opinions of others; to be guided by the + mandates of authority, rather than take the trouble to examine for their + own information. Such, O theologians! are the ruinous foundations upon + which you erect the superstructure of your doctrine. Accordingly, you find + it impossible to form to yourselves any distinct idea of those theories + which serve for the basis of your systems; you are unable to comprehend + either their attributes, their existence, the nature of their localities, + or their mode of action. Thus, even by your own confession, ye are in a + state of profound ignorance, on the primary elements of that which ye + constitute the cause of all that exists: of which, according to your own + account, it is imperative to have a correct knowledge. Under whatever + point of view, therefore, ye are contemplated, it must be admitted ye are + the founders of aerial systems; of fanciful theories: of all + systematizers, ye are consequently the most absurd; because in challenging + your imagination to create a cause, this cause, at least, ought to diffuse + light over the whole; it would be upon this condition alone that its + incomprehensibility could be pardonable; but to speak ingenuously, does + this cause serve to explain any thing? Does it make us conceive more + clearly the origin of the world; bring us more distinctly acquainted with + the actual nature of man; does it more intelligibly elucidate the + faculties of the soul; or point out with more perspicuity the source of + good and evil? No! unquestionably: these subtle theories explain nothing, + although they multiply to infinity their own difficulties; they, in fact, + embarrass elucidation, by plunging into greater obscurity those matters in + which they are interposed. Whatever may be the question agitated, it + becomes complicated: as soon as these theories are introduced, they + envelope the most demonstrable sciences with a thick, impenetrable mist; + render the most simple notions complex; give opacity to the most + diaphanous ideas; turn the most evident opinions into insolvable enigmas. + What exposition of morality does the theories, upon which ye found all the + virtue, present to man? Do not all your oracles breathe inconsistency? + Does not your doctrines embrace every gradation of character, however + discrepant: every known property, however opposed. All your ingenious + systems, all your mysteries, all the subtilties which ye have invented, + are they capable of reconciling that discordant assemblage of amiable and + unamiable qualities, with which ye have dressed up your figments? In + short, is it not by these theories that ye disturb the harmony of the + universe; is it not in their name ye follow up your barbarous + proscriptions; in their support, that ye so inhumanly exterminate all who + refuse to subscribe to your organized reveries; who withhold assent to + those efforts of the imagination which ye have collectively decorated with + the pompous name of religion; but which, individually, ye brand as + superstition, always excepting that to which ye lend yourselves. Agree, + then, O Theologians! Acknowledge, then, ye subtle metaphysicians! Consent, + then, ye organizers of fanciful theories! that not only are ye + systematically absurd, but also that ye finish by being atrocious; because + whenever ye obtain the ascendancy one over the other, your unfortunate + pre-eminence is distinguished by the most malevolent persecution; your + domination is ushered in with cruelty; your career is described with + blood: from the importance which your own interest attaches to your + ruinous dogmas; from the pride with which ye tumble down the less + fortunate systems of those who started with you for the prize of plunder; + <i>from that savage ferocity, under which ye equally overwhelm human + reason, the happiness of the individual, and the felicity of nations.</i>" + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0016" id="link2H_4_0016"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + CHAP. XIV. + </h2> + <h3> + <i>A Summary of the Code of Nature</i>. + </h3> + <p> + Truth is the only object worthy the research of every wise man; since that + which is false cannot be useful to him: whatever constantly injures him + cannot be founded upon truth; consequently, ought to be for ever + proscribed. It is, then, to assist the human mind, truly to labour for his + happiness, to point out to him the clew by which he may extricate himself + from those frightful labyrinths in which his imagination wanders; from + those sinuosities whose devious course makes him err, without ever finding + a termination to his incertitude. Nature alone, known through experience, + can furnish him with this desirable thread; her eternal energies can alone + supply the means of attacking the Minotaur; of exterminating the figments + of hypocrisy; of destroying those monsters, who during so many ages, have + devoured the unhappy victims, which the tyranny of the ministers of Moloch + have exacted as a cruel tribute from affrighted mortals. By steadily + grasping this inestimable clew, rendered still more precious by the beauty + of the donor, man can never be led astray—will never ramble out of + his course; but if, careless of its invaluable properties, for a single + instant he suffers it to drop from his hand; if, like another Theseus, + ungrateful for the favour, he abandons the fair bestower, he will + infallibly fall again into his ancient wanderings; most assuredly become + the prey to the cannibal offspring of the White Bull. In vain shall he + carry his views above his head, to find resources which are at his feet; + so long as man, infatuated with his superstitious notions, shall seek in + an imaginary world the rule of his earthly conduct, he will be without + principles; while he shall pertinaciously contemplate the regions of a + distempered fancy, so long he will grope in those where he actually finds + himself; his uncertain steps will never encounter the welfare he desires; + never lead him to that repose after which he so ardently sighs, nor + conduct him to that surety which is so decidedly requisite to consolidate + his happiness. + </p> + <p> + But man, blinded by his prejudices; rendered obstinate in injuring his + fellow, by his enthusiasm; ranges himself in hostility even against those + who are sincerely desirous of procuring for him the most substantive + benefits. Accustomed to be deceived, he is in a state of continual + suspicion; habituated to mistrust himself, to view his reason with + diffidence, to look upon truth as dangerous, he treats as enemies even + those who most eagerly strive to encourage him; forewarned in early life + against delusion, by the subtilty of imposture, he believes himself + imperatively called upon to guard with the most sedulous activity the + bandeau with which they have hoodwinked him; he thinks his eternal welfare + involved in keeping it for ever over his eyes; he therefore wrestles with + all those who attempt to tear it from his obscured optics. If his visual + organs, accustomed to darkness, are for a moment opened, the light offends + them; he is distressed by its effulgence; he thinks it criminal to be + enlightened; he darts with fury upon those who hold the flambeau by which + he is dazzled. In consequence, the atheist, as the arch rogue from whom he + differs ludicrously calls him, is looked upon as a malignant pest, as a + public poison, which like another Upas, destroys every thing within the + vortex of its influence; he who dares to arouse mortals from the lethargic + habit which the narcotic doses administered by the theologians have + induced passes for a perturbator; he who attempts to calm their frantic + transports, to moderate the fury of their maniacal paroxysms, is himself + viewed as a madman, who ought to be closely chained down in the dungeons + appropriated to lunatics; he who invites his associates to rend their + chains asunder, to break their galling fetters, appears only like an + irrational, inconsiderate being, even to the wretched captives themselves: + who have been taught to believe that nature formed them for no other + purpose than to tremble: only called them into existence that they might + be loaded with shackles. In consequence of these fatal prepossessions, the + <i>Disciple of Nature</i> is generally treated as an assassin; is commonly + received by his fellow citizens in the same manner as the feathered race + receive the doleful bird of night, which as soon as it quits its retreat, + all the other birds follow with a common hatred, uttering a variety of + doleful cries. + </p> + <p> + No, mortals blended by terror! The friend of nature is not your enemy; its + interpreter is not the minister of falsehood; the destroyer of your vain + phantoms is not the devastator of those truths necessary to your + happiness; the disciple of reason is not an irrational being, who either + seeks to poison you, or to infect you with a dangerous delirium. If he is + desirous to wrest the thunder from those terrible theories that affright + ye, it is that ye way discontinue your march, in the midst of storms, over + roads that ye can only distinguish by the sudden, but evanescent + glimmerings of the electric fluid. If he breaks those idols, which fear + has served with myrrh and frankencense—which superstition has + surrounded by gloomy despondency—which fanaticism has imbrued with + blood; it is to substitute in their place those consoling truths that are + calculated to heal the desperate wounds ye have received; that are + suitable to inspire you with courage, sturdily to oppose yourselves to + such dangerous errors; that have power to enable you to resist such + formidable enemies. If he throws down the temples, overturns the altars, + so frequently bathed with the bitter tears of the unfortunate, blackened + by the most cruel sacrifices, smoked with servile incense, it is that he + may erect a fane sacred to peace; a hall dedicated to reason; a durable + monument to virtue, in which ye may at all times find an asylum against + your own phrenzy; a refuge from your own ungovernable passions; a + sanctuary against those powerful dogmatists, by whom ye are oppressed. If + he attacks the haughty pretensions of deified tyrants, who crush ye with + an iron sceptre, it is that ye may enjoy the rights of your nature; it is + to the end that ye may be substantively freemen, in mind as well as in + body; that ye may not be slaves, eternally chained to the oar of misery; + it is that ye may at length be governed by men who are citizens, who may + cherish their own semblances, who way protect mortals like themselves, who + may actually consult the interests of those from whom they hold their + power. If he battles with imposture, it is to re-establish truth in those + rights which have been so long usurped by fiction. If he undermines the + base of that unsteady, fanatical morality, which has hitherto done nothing + more than perplex your minds, without correcting your hearts; it is to + give to ethics an immovable basis, a solid foundation, secured upon your + own nature; upon the reciprocity of those wants which are continually + regenerating in sensible beings: dare, then, to listen to his voice; you + will find it much more intelligible than those ambiguous oracles, which + are announced to you as the offspring of capricious theories; as imperious + decrees that are unceasingly at variance with themselves. Listen then to + nature, she never contradicts her own eternal laws. + </p> + <p> + "O thou!" cries this nature to man, "who, following the impulse I have + given you, during your whole existence, incessantly tend towards + happiness, do not strive to resist my sovereign law. Labour to your own + felicity; partake without fear of the banquet which is spread before you, + with the most hearty welcome; you will find the means legibly written on + your own heart. Vainly dost thou, O superstitious being! seek after thine + happiness beyond the limits of the universe, in which my hand hath placed + thee: vainly shalt thou search it in those inexorable theories, which + thine imagination, ever prone to wander, would establish upon my eternal + throne: vainly dost thou expect it in those fanciful regions, to which + thine own delirium hath given a locality and a shame: vainly dost thou + reckon upon capricious systems, with whose advantages thou art in such + ecstasies; whilst they only fill thine abode with calamity—thine + heart with dread—thy mind with illusions—thy bosom with + groans. Know that when thou neglectest my counsels, the gods will refuse + their aid. Dare, then, to affranchise thyself from the trammels of + superstition, my self-conceited, pragmatic rival, who mistakes my rights; + renounce those empty theories, which are usurpers of my privileges; return + under the dominion of my laws, which, however severe, are mild in + comparison with those of bigotry. It is in my empire alone that true + liberty reigns. Tyranny is unknown to its soil; equity unceasingly watches + over the rights of all my subjects, maintains them in the possession of + their just claims; benevolence, grafted upon humanity, connects them by + amicable bonds; truth enlightens them; never can imposture blind them with + his obscuring mists. Return, then, my child, to thy fostering mother's + arms! Deserter, trace back thy wandering steps to nature! She will console + thee for thine evils; she will drive from thine heart those appalling + fears which overwhelm thee; those inquietudes that distract thee; those + transports which agitate thee; those hatreds that separate thee from thy + fellow man, whom thou shouldst love as thyself. Return to nature, to + humanity, to thyself! Strew flowers over the road of life: cease to + contemplate the future; live to thine own happiness; exist for thy fellow + creatures; retire into thyself, examine thine own heart, then consider the + sensitive beings by whom thou art surrounded: leave to their inventors + those systems which can effect nothing towards thy felicity. Enjoy + thyself, and cause others also to enjoy, those comforts which I have + placed with a liberal hand, for all the children of the earth; who all + equally emanate from my bosom: assist them to support the sorrows to which + necessity has submitted them in common with thyself. Know, that I approve + thy pleasures, when without injuring thyself, they are not fatal to thy + brethren, whom I have rendered indispensably necessary to thine own + individual happiness. These pleasures are freely permitted thee, if thou + indulgest them with moderation; with that discretion which I myself have + fixed. Be happy, then, O man! Nature invites thee to participate in it; + but always remember, thou canst not be so alone; because I invite all + mortals to happiness as well as thyself; thou will find it is only in + securing their felicity that thou canst consolidate thine own. Such is the + decree of thy destiny: if thou shalt attempt to withdraw thyself from its + operation, recollect that hatred will pursue thee; vengeance overtake thy + steps; and remorse be ever ready at hand to punish the infractions of its + irrevocable mandates. + </p> + <p> + "Follow then, O man! in whatever station thou findest thyself, the routine + I have described for thee, to obtain that happiness to which thou hast an + indispensable right to challenge pretension. Let the sensations of + humanity interest thee for the condition of other men, who are thy fellow + creatures; let thine heart have commisseration for their misfortunes: let + thy generous hand spontaneously stretch forth to lend succour to the + unhappy mortal who is overwhelmed by his destiny; always bearing in thy + recollection, that it may fall heavy upon thyself, as it now does upon + him. Acknowledge, then, without guile, that every unfortunate has an + inalienable right to thy kindness. Above all, wipe from the eyes of + oppressed innocence the trickling crystals of agonized feeling; let the + tears of virtue in distress, fall upon thy sympathizing bosom; let the + genial glow of sincere friendship animate thine honest heart; let the fond + attachment of a mate, cherished by thy warmest affection, make thee forget + the sorrows of life: be faithful to her love, responsible to her + tenderness, that she may reward thee by a reciprocity of feeling; that + under the eyes of parents united in virtuous esteem, thy offspring may + learn to set a proper value on practical virtue; that after having + occupied thy riper years, they may comfort thy declining age, gild with + content thy setting sun, cheer the evening of thine existence, by a + dutiful return of that care which thou shalt have bestowed on their + imbecile infancy. + </p> + <p> + "Be just, because equity is the support of human society! Be good, because + goodness connects all hearts in adamantine bonds! Be indulgent, because + feeble thyself, thou livest with beings who partake of thy weakness! Be + gentle, because mildness attracts attention! Be thankful, because + gratitude feeds benevolence, nourishes generosity! Be modest, because + haughtiness is disgusting to beings at all times well with themselves. + Forgive injuries, because revenge perpetuates hatred! Do good to him who + injureth thee, in order to shew thyself more noble than he is; to make a + friend of him, who was once thine enemy! Be reserved in thy demeanor, + temperate in thine enjoyment, chaste in thy pleasures, because + voluptuousness begets weariness, intemperance engenders disease; forward + manners are revolting: excess at all times relaxes the springs of thy + machine, will ultimately destroy thy being, and render thee hateful to + thyself, contemptible to others. + </p> + <p> + "Be a faithful citizen; because the community is necessary to thine own + security; to the enjoyment of thine own existence; to the furtherance of + thine own happiness. Be loyal, but be brave; submit to legitimate + authority; because it is requisite to the maintenance of that society + which is necessary to thyself. Be obedient to the laws; because they <i>are</i>, + or <i>ought to be</i>, the expression of the public will, to which thine + own particular will ought ever to be subordinate. Defend thy country with + zeal; because it is that which renders thee happy, which contains thy + property, as well as those beings dearest to thine heart: do not permit + this common parent of thyself, as well as of thy fellow citizens, to fall + under the shackles of tyranny; because from thence it will be no more than + thy common prison. If thy country, deaf to the equity of thy claims, + refuses thee happiness—if, submitted to an unjust power, it suffers + thee to be oppressed, withdraw thyself from its bosom in silence, but + never disturb its peace. + </p> + <p> + "In short, be a man; be a sensible, rational being; be a faithful husband; + a tender father; an equitable master; a zealous citizen; labour to serve + thy country by thy prowess; by thy talents; by thine industry; above all, + by thy virtues. Participate with thine associates those gifts which nature + has bestowed upon thee; diffuse happiness, among thy fellow mortals; + inspire thy fellow citizens with content; spread joy over all those who + approach thee, that the sphere of thine actions, enlivened by thy + kindness, illumined by thy benevolence, may re-act upon thyself; be + assured that the man who makes others happy cannot himself be miserable. + In thus conducting thyself, whatever may be the injustice of others, + whatever may be the blindness of those beings with whom it is thy destiny + to live, thou wilt never be totally bereft of the recompense which is thy + due; no power on earth be able to ravish from thee that never failing + source of the purest felicity, inward content; at each moment thou wilt + fall back with pleasure upon thyself; thou wilt neither feel the rankling + of shame, the terror of internal alarm, nor find thy heart corroded by + remorse. Thou wilt esteem thyself; thou wilt be cherished by the virtuous, + applauded and loved by all good men, whose suffrages are much more + valuable than those of the bewildered multitude. Nevertheless, if + externals occupy thy contemplation, smiling countenances will greet thy + presence; happy faces will express the interest they have in thy welfare; + jocund beings will make thee participate in their placid feelings. A life + so spent, will each moment be marked by the serenity of thine own soul, by + the affection of the beings who environ thee; will be made cheerful by the + friendship of thy fellows; will enable thee to rise a contented, satisfied + guest from the general feast; conduct thee gently down the declivity of + life, lead thee peaceably to the period of thy days; for die thou must: + but already thou wilt survive thyself in thought; thou wilt always live in + the remembrance of thy friends; in the grateful recollection of those + beings whose comforts have been augmented by thy friendly attentions; thy + virtues will, beforehand have erected to thy fame an imperishable + monument: if heaven occupies itself with thee, it will feel satisfied with + thy conduct, when it shall thus have contented the earth. + </p> + <p> + "Beware, then, how thou complainest of thy condition; be just, be kind, be + virtuous, and thou canst never be wholly destitute of felicity. Take heed + how thou enviest the transient pleasure of seductive crime; the deceitful + power of victorious tyranny; the specious tranquillity of interested + imposture; the plausible manners of venal justice; the shewy, ostentatious + parade of hardened opulence. Never be tempted to increase the number of + sycophants to an ambitious despot; to swell the catalogue of slaves to an + unjust tyrant; never suffer thyself to be allured to infamy, to the + practice of extortion, to the commission of outrage, by the fatal + privilege of oppressing thy fellows; always recollect it will be at the + expence of the most bitter remorse thou wilt acquire this baneful + advantage. Never be the mercenary accomplice of the spoilers of thy + country; they are obliged to blush secretly whenever they meet the public + eye. + </p> + <p> + "For, do not deceive thyself, it is I who punish, with an unerring hand, + all the crimes of the earth; the wicked may escape the laws of man, but + they never escape mine. It is I who have formed the hearts, as well an the + bodies of mortals; it is I who have fixed the laws which govern them. If + thou deliverest thyself up to voluptuous enjoyment, the companions of thy + debaucheries may applaud thee; but I shall punish thee with the most cruel + infirmities; these will terminate a life of shame with deserved contempt. + If thou givest, thyself up to intemperate indulgences, human laws may not + correct thee, but I shall castigate thee severely by abridging thy days. + If thou art vicious, thy fatal habits will recoil on thine own head. + Princes, those terrestrial divinities, whose power places them above the + laws of mankind, are nevertheless obliged to tremble under the silent + operation of my decrees. It is I who chastise them; it is I who fill their + breasts with suspicion; it is I who inspire them with terror; it is I who + make them writhe under inquietude; it is I who make them shudder with + horror, at the very name of august truth; it is I who, amidst the crowd of + nobles who surround them, make them feel the inward workings of shame; the + keen anguish of guilt; the poisoned arrows of regret; the cruel stings of + remorse; it is I who, when they abuse my bounty, diffuse weariness over + their benumbed souls; it is I who follow uncreated, eternal justice; it is + I who, without distinction of persons, know how to make the balance even; + to adjust the chastisement to the fault; to make the misery bear its due + proportion to the depravity; to inflict punishment commensurate with the + crime. The laws of man are just, only when they are in conformity with + mine; his judgements are rational, only when I have dictated them: my laws + alone are immutable, universal, irrefragable; formed to regulate the + condition of the human race, in all ages, in all places, under all + circumstances. + </p> + <p> + "If thou doubtest mine authority, if thou questionest the irresistible + power I possess over mortals, contemplate the vengeance I wreak on all + those who resist my decrees. Dive into the recesses of the hearts of those + various criminals, whose countenances, assuming a forced smile, cover + souls torn with anguish. Dost thou not behold ambition tormented day and + night, with an ardour which nothing can extinguish? Dost not thou see the + mighty conquerer become the lord of devastated solitudes; his victorious + career, marked by a blasted cultivation, reign sorrowfully over smoking + ruins; govern unhappy wretches who curse him in their hearts; while his + soul, gnawed by remorse, sickens at the gloomy aspect of his own triumphs? + Dost thou believe that the tyrant, encircled with his flatterers, who stun + him with their praise, is unconscious of the hatred which his oppression + excites; of the contempt which his vices draw upon him; of the sneers + which his inutility call forth; of the scorn which his debaucheries entail + upon his name? Dost thou think that the haughty courtier does not inwardly + blush at the galling insults he brooks; despise, from the bottom of his + soul, those meannesses by which he is compelled to purchase favours; feel + at his heart's core the wretched dependence in which his cupidity places + him. + </p> + <p> + "Contemplate the indolent child of wealth, behold him a prey to the + lassitude of unmeasured enjoyment, corroded by the satiety which always + follows his exhausted pleasures. View the miser with an emaciated + countenance, the consequence of his own penurious disposition, whose + callous heart is inaccessible to the calls of misery, groaning over the + accumulating load of useless treasure, which at the expense of himself, he + has laboured to amass. Behold the gay voluptuary, the smiling debaucheé, + secretly lament the health they have so inconsiderately damaged so + prodigally thrown away: see disdain, joined to hatred, reign between those + adulterous married couples, who have reciprocally violated the sacred vows + they mutually pledged at the altar of Hymen; whose appetencies have + rendered them the scorn of the world; the jest of their acquaintance; + polluted tributaries to the surgeon. See the liar deprived of all + confidence; the knave stript of all trust; the hypocrite fearfully + avoiding the penetrating looks of his inquisitive neighbour; the impostor + trembling at the very name of formidable truth. Bring under your review + the heart of the envious, uselessly dishonored; that withers at the sight + of his neighbour's prosperity. Cast your eyes on the frozen soul of the + ungrateful wretch, whom no kindness can warm, no benevolence thaw, no + beneficence convert into a genial fluid. Survey the iron feelings of that + monster whom the sighs of the unfortunate cannot mollify. Behold the + revengeful being nourished with venemous gall, whose very thoughts are + serpents; who in his rage consumes himself. Envy, if thou canst, the + waking slumbers of the homicide; the startings of the iniquitous judge; + the restlessness of the oppressor of innocence; the fearful visions of the + extortioner; whose couches are infested with the torches of the furies. + Thou tremblest without doubt at the sight of that distraction which, + amidst their splendid luxuries, agitates those farmers of the revenue, who + fatten upon public calamnity—who devour the substance of the orphan—who + consume the means of the widow—who grind the hard earnings of the + poor: thou shudderest at witnessing the remorse which rends the souls of + those reverend criminals, whom the uninformed believe to be happy, whilst + the contempt which they have for themselves, the unerring shafts of secret + upbraidings, are incessantly revenging an outraged nation. Thou seest, + that content is for ever banished the heart; quiet for ever driven from + the habitations of those miserable wretches on whose minds I have + indelibly engraved the scorn, the infamy, the chastisement which they + deserve. But, no! thine eyes cannot sustain the tragic spectacle of my + vengeance. Humanity obliges thee to partake of their merited sufferings; + thou art moved to pity for these unhappy people, to whom consecrated + errors renders vice necessary; whose fatal habits make them familiar with + crime. Yes; thou shunnest them without hating them; thou wouldst succour + them, if their contumacious perversity had left thee the means. When thou + comparest thine own condition, when thou examinest thine own soul, thou + wilt have just cause to felicitate thyself, if thou shalt find that peace + has taken up her abode with thee; that contentment dwells at the bottom of + thine own heart. In short, thou seest accomplished upon them, as well as, + upon thyself, the unalterable decrees of destiny, which imperiously + demand, that crime shall punish itself, that virtue never shall be + destitute Of remuneration." + </p> + <p> + Such is the sum of those truths which are contained in the <i>Code of + Nature</i>; such are the doctrines, which its disciples can announce. They + are unquestionably preferable to that supernatural superstition which + never does any thing but mischief to the human species. Such is the + worship that is taught by that sacred reason, which is the object of + contempt with the theologian; which meets the insult of the fanatic; who + only estimates that which man can neither conceive nor practise; who make + his morality consist in fictitious duties; his virtue in actions generally + useless, frequently pernicious to the welfare of society; who for want of + being acquainted with nature, which is before their eyes, believe + themselves obliged to seek in ideal worlds imaginary motives, of which + every thing proves the inefficacy. The motive which the morality of nature + employs, is the self-evident interest of each individual, of each + community, of the whole human species, in all times, in every country, + under all circumstances. Its worship is the sacrifice of vice, the + practise of real virtues; its object is the conservation of the human + race, the happiness of the individual, the peace of mankind; its + recompences are affection, esteem, and glory; or in their default, + contentment of mind, with merited self-esteem, of which no power will ever + be able to deprive virtuous mortals; its punishments, are hatred, + contempt, and indignation; which society always reserves for those who + outrage its interests; from which even the most powerful can never + effectually shield themselves. + </p> + <p> + Those nations who shall be disposed to practise a morality so wise, who + shall inculcate it in infancy, whose laws shall unceasingly confirm it, + will neither have occasion for superstition, nor for chimeras. Those who + shall obstinately prefer figments to their dearest interests, will + certainly march forward to ruin. If they maintain themselves for a season, + it is because the power of nature sometimes drives them back to reason, in + despite of those prejudices which appear to lead them on to certain + destruction. Superstition, leagued with tyranny, for the waste of the + human species, are themselves frequently obliged to implore the assistance + of a reason which they contemn; of a nature which they disdain; which they + debase; which they endeavour to crush under the ponderous bulk of + artificial theories. Superstition, in all times so fatal to mortals, when + attacked by reason, assumes the sacred mantle of public utility; rests its + importance on false grounds, founds its rights upon the indissoluble + alliance which it pretends subsists between morality and itself; + notwithstanding it never ceases for a single instant to wage against it + the most cruel hostility. It is, unquestionably, by this artifice, that it + has seduced so many sages. In the honesty of their hearts, they believe it + useful to politics; necessary to restrain the ungovernable fury of the + passions; thus hypocritical superstition, in order to mask to superficial + observers, its own hideous character, like the ass with the lion's skin, + always knows how to cover itself with the sacred armour of utility; to + buckle on the invulnerable shield of virtue; it has therefore, been + believed imperative to respect it, notwithstanding it felt awkward under + these incumbrances; it consequently has become a duty to favor imposture, + because it has artfully entrenched itself behind the altars of truth; its + ears, however, discover its worthlessness; its natural cowardice betrays + itself; it is from this intrenchment we ought to drive it; it should be + dragged forth to public view; stripped of its surreptitious panoply; + exposed in its native deformity; in order that the human race may become + acquainted with its dissimulation; that mankind may have a knowledge of + its crimes; that the universe may behold its sacrilegious hands, armed + with homicidal poniards, stained with the blood of nations, whom it either + intoxicates with its fury, or immolates without pity to the violence of + its passions. + </p> + <p> + The MORALITY OF NATURE is the only creed which her interpreter offers to + his fellow citizens; to nations; to the human species; to future races, + weaned from those prejudices which have so frequently disturbed the + felicity of their ancestors. The friend of mankind cannot be the friend of + delusion, which at all times has been a real scourge to the earth. The + APOSTLE OF NATURE will not be the instrument of deceitful chimeras, by + which this world is made only an abode of illusions; the adorer of truth + will not compromise with falsehood; he will make no covenant with error; + conscious it must always be fatal to mortals. He knows that the happiness + of the human race imperiously exacts that the dark unsteady edifice of + superstition should be razed to its foundations; in order to elevate on + its ruins a temple suitable to peace—a fane sacred to virtue. He + feels it is only by extirpating, even to the most slender fibres, the + poisonous tree, that during so many ages has overshadowed the universe, + that the inhabitants of this world will be able to use their own optics—to + bear with steadiness that light which is competent to illumine their + understanding—to guide their wayward steps—to give the + necessary ardency to their souls. If his efforts should be vain; if he + cannot inspire with courage, beings too much accustomed to tremble; he + will, at least, applaud himself for having dared the attempt. + Nevertheless, he will not judge his exertions fruitless, if he has only + been enabled to make a single mortal happy: if his principles have calmed + the conflicting transports of one honest soul; if his reasonings have + cheered up some few virtuous hearts. At least he will have the advantage + of having banished from his own mind the importunate terror of + superstition; of having expelled from his own heart the gall which + exasperates zeal; of having trodden under foot those chimeras with which + the uninformed are tormented. Thus, escaped from the peril of the storm, + he will calmly contemplate from the summit of his rock, those tremendous + hurricanes which superstition excites; he will hold forth a succouring + hand to those who shall be willing to accept it; he will encourage them + with his voice; he will second them with his best exertions, and in the + warmth of his own compassionate heart, he will exclaim: + </p> + <p> + O NATURE; sovereign of all beings! and ye, her adorable daughters, VIRTUE, + REASON, and TRUTH! remain for ever our revered protectors: it is to you + that belong the praises of the human race; to you appertains the homage of + the earth. Shew, us then, O NATURE! that which man ought to do, in order + to obtain the happiness which thou makest him desire. VIRTUE! Animate him + with thy beneficent fire. REASON! Conduct his uncertain steps through the + paths of life. TRUTH! Let thy torch illumine his intellect, dissipate the + darkness of his road. Unite, O assisting deities! your powers, in order to + submit the hearts of mankind to your dominion. Banish error from our mind; + wickedness from our hearts; confusion from our footsteps; cause knowledge + to extend its salubrious reign; goodness to occupy our souls; serenity to + dwell in our bosoms. Let imposture, confounded, never again dare to shew + its head. Let our eyes, so long, either dazzled or blindfolded, be at + length fixed upon those objects we ought to seek. Dispel for ever those + mists of ignorance, those hideous phantoms, together with those seducing + chimeras, which only serve to lead us astray. Extricate us from that dark + abyss into which we are plunged by superstition; overthrow the fatal + empire of delusion; crumble the throne of falsehood; wrest from their + polluted hands the power they have usurped. Command men, without sharing + your authority with mortals: break the chains that bind them down in + slavery: tear away the bandeau by which they are hoodwinked; allay the + fury that intoxicates them; break in the hands of sanguinary, lawless + tyrants, that iron sceptre with which they are crushed to exile; the + imaginary regions, from whence fear has imported them, those theories by + which they are afflicted. Inspire the intelligent being with courage; + infuse energy into his system, that, at length, he may feel his own + dignity; that he may dare to love himself; to esteem his own actions when + they are worthy; that a slave only to your eternal laws, he may no longer + fear to enfranchise himself from all other trammels; that blest with + freedom, he may have the wisdom to cherish his fellow creature; and become + happy by learning to perfection his own condition; instruct him in the + great lesson, that the high road to felicity, is prudently to partake + himself, and also to cause others to enjoy, the rich banquet which thou, O + Nature! hast so bountifully set before him. Console thy children for those + sorrows to which their destiny submits them, by those pleasures which + wisdom allows them to partake; teach them to be contented with their + condition; to banish envy from their mind; to yield silently to necessity. + Conduct them without alarm to that period which all beings must find; <i>let + them learn that time changes all things, that consequently they are made + neither to avoid its scythe nor to fear its arrival.</i> + </p> + <p> + <br /><br /> + </p> + <hr /> + <p> + <a name="link2H_4_0017" id="link2H_4_0017"> </a> + </p> + <div style="height: 4em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + <h2> + [TRANSLATOR'S APPENDIX] + </h2> + <h3> + A BRIEF SKETCH + </h3> + <h3> + OF THE + </h3> + <h3> + LIFE AND WRITINGS + </h3> + <h3> + OF + </h3> + <h3> + M. DE. MIRABAUD. + </h3> + <p> + At a time when we are on the eve of an important change in our political + affairs, which must evidently lead either to the recovery and + re-establishment of our liberties, or to a military despotism, those who + are connected with the press ought to use every exertion to enlighten + their fellow-citizens, and to assert their right of canvassing, in the + most free and unrestrained manner, every subject connected with the + happiness of man. + </p> + <p> + The priesthood have ever been convenient tools in the hands of tyrants, to + keep the bulk of the people in a degraded servility. By the superstitious + and slavish doctrines which they infuse into their minds, they prevent + them from thinking for themselves and asserting their own independence. At + a moment when national schools are erecting in every quarter of the + country, not with a sincere desire of enlightening the rising generation, + but with the insidious design of instilling into their minds the doctrines + of "Church and King," in order to bolster up a little longer the present + rotten, tottering, and corrupt system: at a moment, too, when thousands of + fanatic preachers are traversing the country, with a view to subjugate the + human mind to the baleful empire of visonary enthusiasm and sectarian + bigotry to the utter extinction of every noble, manly, liberal, and + pilanthropic principle;—at such a moment as this, we thought that + the "SYSTEM OF NATURE" could not fail to render essential service to the + cause both of civil and religious liberty. No work, ancient or modern, has + surpassed it, in the eloquence and sublimity of its language, or in the + facility with which it treats the most abtruse and difficult subjects. It + is, without exception, the boldest effort the human mind has yet produced, + in the investigation of morals and theology—in the destruction of + priestcraft and superstition—and in developing the sources of all + those passions and prejudices which have proved so fatal to the + tranquillity of the world. + </p> + <p> + The republic of letters has never produced an author whose pen was so well + calculated to emancipate mankind from all those trammels with which the + nurse, the schoolmaster and the priest have successively locked up their + noblest faculties, before they were capable of reasoning and judging for + themselves. The frightful apprehensions of the gloomy bigot, and all the + appalling terrors of superstition, are here utterly annihilated, to the + complete satisfaction of every unbiassed and impartial person.—These + we considered as necessary observations to make, previous to any attempt + at the biography of the author. + </p> + <p> + Biography may be reckoned among the most interesting of literary + productions. Its intrinsic value is such, that, though capable of + extraordinary embellishment from the hand of genius, yet no inferiority of + execution can so degrade it, as to deprive it of utility. Whatever relates + even to man in general, considered only as an aggregate of active and + intelligent beings, has a strong claim upon our notice; but that which + relates to our author, as distinguished from the rest of his species, + moving in a more exalted sphere, and towering above them by the + resplendent excellencies of his mind, seems to me to be peculiarly + calculated for our contemplation, and ought to form the highest pleasure + of our lives. There is a principle of curiosity implanted in us, which + leads us, in an especial manner, to investigate our fellow creatures; the + eager inquisitiveness with which the mechanic seeks to know the history of + his fellow-workmen and the ardour with which the philosopher, the poet, or + the historian hunts for details that may familiarize him with, a Descartes + or a Newton, with a Milton, a Hume, or a Gibbon—spring from the same + source. Their object, however, may perhaps vary; for, in the former, it + may be for the sake of detraction, invidious cavil, or malice; in the + latter, it is a sweet homage paid by the human heart to the memory of + departed genius. + </p> + <p> + It has been repeatedly observed that the life of a scholar affords few + materials for biography. This is only negatively true;—could every + scholar have a Boswell, the remark would vanish; or were every scholar a + Rousseau, a Gibbon, or a Cumberland it would be equally nugatory. What can + present higher objects of contemplation—what can claim more forcibly + our attention—where can we seek for subjects of a more precious + nature, than in the elucidation of the operations of mind, the acquisition + of knowledge, the gradual expansion of genius; its application, its + felicities, its sorrows, its wreaths of fame, its cold, undeserved + neglect? Such scenes, painted by, the artist himself, are a rich bequest + to mankind: even when traced by the hand of friendship or the pencil of + admiration, they possess a permanent interest in our hearts. I cannot + conceive a life more worthy of public notice, more important, more + interesting to human nature, than the life of a literary man, were it + executed according to the ideas I have formed of it: did it exhibit a + faithful delineation of the progress of intellect, from the cradle + upwards; did it portray, in accurate colors, the production of what we + call genius: by what accident it was first awakened; what were its first + tendencies; how directed to a particular object; by what means it was + nourished and unfolded; the gradual progress of its operation in the + production of a work; its hopes and fears; its delights; its miseries; its + inspirations; and all the thousand fleeting joys that so often invest its + path but for a moment, and then fade like the dews of the morning. Let it + contain too a transcript of the many nameless transports that float round + the heart, that dance in the gay circle before the ardent gazing eye, when + the first conception of some future effort strikes the mind; how it + pictures undefined delights of fame and popular applause; how it + anticipates the bright moments of invention, and dwells with prophetic + ecstasy on the felicitous execution of particular parts, that already + start into existence by the magic touch of a heated imagination. Let it + depict the tender feelings of solitude, the breathings of midnight + silence, the scenes of mimic life, of imaged trial, that often occupy the + musing mind; let it be such a work, so drawn, so coloured, and who shall + pronounce it inferior? Who rather will not confess that it presents a + picture of human nature, where every heart may find some corresponding + harmony? When, therefore, it is said, that the life of a scholar is + barren, it is so only because it has never been properly delineated; + because those parts only have been selected which are common, and fail to + distinguish him from the common man; because we have never penetrated into + his closet, or into his heart; because we have drawn him only as an + outward figure, and left unnoticed that internal structure that would + delight, astonish, and improve. And then, when we compare the life of such + a man with the more active one of a soldier, a statesman, or a lawyer, we + pronounce it insipid, uninteresting. True;—the man of study has not + fought for hire—he has not slaughtered at the command of a master: + he would disdain to do so. Though unaccompanied with the glaring actions + of public men, which confound and dazzle by their publicity, but shrink + from the estimation of moral truth, it would present a far nobler picture; + yes, and a more instructive one:—the calm disciple of reason + meditates in silence; he walks his road with innoxious humility; he is + poor, but his mind is his treasure; he cultivates his reason, and she + lifts him to the pinnacle of truth; he learns to tear away the veil of + self-love, folly, pride, and prejudice, and bares the human heart to his + inspection; he corrects and amends; he repairs the breaches made by + passion; the proud man passes him by, and looks upon him with scorn; but + he feels his own worth, that ennobling consciousness which swells in every + vein, and inspires him with true pride—with manly independence: to + such a man I could sooner bow in reverence, than to the haughtiest, most + successful candidate for the world's ambition. But of such men, for the + reason I have already mentioned, our information is scanty. While of + others, who have commanded a greater share of public notoriety, venal or + mistaken admiration has given more than we wished to know. Among these + respected individuals of human nature, may be placed Mirabaud. Had + Mirabaud been an Englishman, who doubts but that we should have possessed + at least ample details of the usual subjects of biographical notice; while + all that has been collected among his own countrymen, is a scanty memoir + in a common dictionary. That we are doomed to remain ignorant of the life + of such men, speaks a loud disgrace.—I lament it. + </p> + <p> + JOHN BAPTISTE MIRABAUD, was born at Paris in the year 1674. He prosecuted + his infantile studies under the direction of his parents, and was + afterwards entered a member of the <i>Congregation of the Priests of the + Oratory</i>, where he passed several years, and produced some very bold + writings, which were never intended for publication. + </p> + <p> + He was subsequently appointed tutor to the princesses of the House of + Orleans, and then took the resolution of destroying the greater part of + the manuscripts that he produced while a member of the <i>Congregation</i>; + but the treachery of some of his friends, to whom he had confided his + manuscripts, rendered this precaution useless, for some of his works were + published during the time he remained the preceptor to his royal pupils; + among which number may be reckoned his "New Liberties of Thought," a work + but little calculated for gaining him friends in the purlieus of the Court + of Orleans. The "Origin and Antiquity of the World," in three parts, was + also published at this period, and from the publication of this work, may + be dated the resolution of M. de Mirabaud to quit his office of preceptor, + which he relinquished, having become more independent; he now gave himself + up entirely to his philosophical studies, and produced the "System of + Nature," with which he was assisted by Diderot, D'Alembert, Baron D'Olbac, + and others. + </p> + <p> + The profound metaphysical knowledge displayed throughout the System of + Nature, and the doctrines which are therein advanced, warrants the + conclusion, that it is at once the most decisive, boldest, and most + extraordinary work, that the human understanding ever had the courage to + produce. The study of metaphysics his generally been considered the most + terrific to the indolent mind; but the clear and perspicuous reasoning of + a Mirabaud, who has united the most profound argument, with the most + fascinating eloquence, charm and instruct us at the same time. But it was + not, to be expected that such doctrines as are contained in the System of + Nature, would be advanced without meeting with some opposition from the + superficial and bigoted metaphysicians, who feel an interest in upholding + a system of delusion and superstition. No! certainly not, Their interest + was threatened, and their <i>craft</i> in danger, and the consequence was, + that the <i>Atheist</i> or <i>Disciple of Nature</i>, has been abused with + every scurrilous epithet, "full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." + </p> + <p> + Atheism is stigmatized with having "opened a wide door for libertinism, + destroying the social and moral compact; and striking a deadly blow at + religion. It is asserted that the atheist, who by his opinions has + deprived himself of the hope and consolation of a future life, has no + motive for the practise of virtue, or to contribute to the well being of + society. Deprived of a chimera which religion every where presents him, he + wanders through the cheerless gloom of scepticism, regardless of the + consequences of an abandoned life. Without a God, he acknowledges no + benefactor; without divine laws, he knows no rule for the conduct of life, + and submits to no law but his passions. An enemy to all social order, he + spurns at human laws, and breaks through every barrier opposed to his + wickedness." Under such colours is an atheist painted: a short digression + must be suffered to examine this picture, and to disprove the assertions + so sweepingly made. + </p> + <p> + I admit that atheism strikes a deadly blow at religion; because under the + cloak of religion, mankind have been oppressed in all ages; but that it + encourages libertinism, or destroys the "social and moral compact," I have + yet to learn. In all organized governments, men are restrained from crime + and compelled to submission by laws supposed to be made for the general + benefit. These laws are the effect of the first formation of society for + mutual preservation. Here then is a sufficient motive for the one as well + as the other, to contribute to the well-being of society. The laws of + Nature are the same in effect on the atheist and the religionist. If man + be led captive by his passions, and gives himself to debauchery and + voluptuousness, nature will punish him with bodily infirmities and a + debilitated mind. If he be intemperate, she will shorten his days and + bring him to the grave with the most poignant remorse. The fatal effects + of his vicious propensities will fall upon his own head. A disturber of + social order will live in continual fear of the vengeance of society, and + that very fear is a more dreadful punishment than the just vengeance which + perhaps he escapes. It renders life burdensome, and makes a man hateful to + himself. Can men have stronger motives for the practise of virtue? The + atheist is in full possession of these motives, and the religionist is + most completely swayed by them, whatever may be his pretensions to others + derived from religion. But we are assured he has other motives; more + powerful incentives, in the promise of future rewards and punishments. + This, like all other chimerical doctrines, cannot be maintained if we look + at the general practise of mankind. Let us trace the effects of this + doctrine, or rather let us examine the actions, conduct, and character of + men professing it, and we shall see how little influence it has over them. + The bulk of society believe they shall answer in a future life for the + deeds done in the present. Nay, I hardly think one in a hundred thousand + will say they doubt it. What then is its effect? With this dreadful + sentence, <i>"Thou shalt go into everlasting punishment,"</i> continually + sounded in their ears, do we not daily see the greatest enormities + committed? Are not the most horrid crimes perpetrated in all parts of the + world? The most vicious propensities and the most extravagant follies are + almost indiscriminately gratified. Is not vice frequently triumphant, and + virtue compelled to seek her own reward in retirement? The laws of society + are broken by the most flagrant injustice, and the laws of nature outraged + by the most shocking depravity. All this evil exists in nations believing + themselves to be accountable beings after death. Where then are the + beneficial effects arising, to mankind from the promulgation of this + doctrine? Men who cannot be restrained from doing evil by human laws, have + no dread of any other. Their whole lives and conduct confirm this. Others + who live in submission to the laws of society, give themselves up to those + vicious habits, (without fear of divine laws) which the law does not take + cognizance of. Men, not wholly depraved, or not without the pale of + society, generally respect the laws, and fear the bad opinion of others. + Hence we observe, when interest or passion leads them into secret vices, + they invariably play the hypocrite; and although they are aware of the + denunciations of their God, whom they acknowledge is a witness to all + their actions, while they preserve their fair fame they still persevere. + In fact, they live as if they disbelieved in his existence; and yet the + greatest criminal, the most depraved wretch, would shudder at being told + there is no God. The atheist, as a man, is liable to commit the same + crimes, and fall into the same vices as the believer; but because he is an + atheist, is he a worse criminal than the other? In one respect, I conceive + he is not so bad. He only acts in defiance of <i>human</i> laws,—he + only offends men; the other infringes <i>both divine</i> and <i>human</i>;—he + defies both God and man. Both are injurious to society and themselves, and + both are actuated by the came motives. + </p> + <p> + Again we are told, that the well disposed part of mankind are rendered + more virtuous, and the vicious less vicious by this doctrine. How are we + to know that? If the virtuous man acts uprightly, does good to his fellow + creatures, restrains his passions, and returns good for evil, experience + teaches him it is his interest so to do. Those who are viciously disposed + are only deterred from crime by penal laws. Societies cannot long exist, + where evil has the ascendency. Without social laws, this would really be + the case, notwithstanding the threats of an avenging God. If men were told + they would not be answerable for the evil committed in this life to human + laws, but that God would punish them after death, it is evident the human + race would soon be exterminated. On the other hand, tell them their crimes + will never be punished by God, or, in other words, there is no other God + than NATURE, but that the laws of men will avenge the offences against + society; so long as those laws are administered with justice and + impartiality, so long will such society continue to improve. Hence it is + evident that the system which will maintain order in society by itself, + must be the best and most rational. A good government without religion + would be more solid and lasting, and tend more to the preservation of + mankind, than all the theocratical or ecclesiastical governments that ever + the world was subject to.—Thus much for the opponents of atheism. + </p> + <p> + It has been asserted with a perverse obstinacy, by the advocates for the + existence of a deity, that the SYSTEM OF NATURE was never written by the + author whose name it bears.—It is granted that it was not published + during his life: but that circumstance forms no reason why such a + conclusion should be drawn. The persecutions which the atheists have + endured, were a sufficient excuse for the work not appearing in any form + during the life time of its venerable author. The Athenians sought to try + Diagoras the Melian, for atheism; but he fled from Athens, and a price was + offered for his head. Protagoras was banished from Athens, and his books + burnt, because he ventured to assert, that he knew nothing of the gods. + Stephen Dolet was burnt at Paris for atheism. Giordano Bruno was burnt by + the Inquisitors in Italy. Lucilio Vanini was burnt at Thoulouse, through + the kind offices of an Attorney-General. Bayle was under the necessity of + fleeing to Holland. Casimio Liszynski was executed at Grodno;—and + Akenhead at Edinborough. And the body of the eloquent and erudite Hume, + was obliged to be watched many nights by his friends, lest it should be + taken up by the fanatics, who considered him one of the greatest monsters + of iniquity, because he did not happen to believe as they believed.—With + these pictures of Christian persecution before his eyes, is it surprising + that M. de Mirabaud should adopt the resolution of suffering the SYSTEM OF + NATURE to appear as a posthumous work? That the same fate would have + attended him, the most devout Christian will not undertake to deny. + </p> + <p> + However the sentiments of M. de Mirabaud may be condemned by the fanatics, + all those who knew him bear the most brilliant testimony of his integrity, + candour, and the soundness of his understanding; in a word, to his social + virtues, and the innocence of his manners. He died universally regretted, + at Paris, the twenty-fourth of June, 1760, in the eighty-sixth year of his + age. + </p> + <p> + The following works, written by him at different periods, were never + published:—<i>The Life of Jesus Christ. Impartial Reflections on the + Gospel. The Morality of Nature. An Abridged History of the Priesthood; + Ancient and Modern. The Opinions of the Ancients concerning the Jews.</i> + A wretched mutilated edition of this last work was published at Amsterdam, + in 1740, in two small volumes, under the title of <i>Miscellaneous + Dissertations</i>. + </p> + <h3> + FINIS. + </h3> + <div style="height: 6em;"> + <br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> + </div> + + + + + + + +<pre> + + + + + +End of the Project Gutenberg EBook of The System of Nature, Volume 2, by +Paul Henri Thiery (Baron D'Holbach) + +*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE SYSTEM OF NATURE, VOLUME 2 *** + +***** This file should be named 8910-h.htm or 8910-h.zip ***** +This and all associated files of various formats will be found in: + http://www.gutenberg.org/8/9/1/8910/ + + +Text file produced by Freethought Archives and Distributed Proofreaders + +HTML file produced by David Widger + + +Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions +will be renamed. + +Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no +one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation +(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without +permission and without paying copyright royalties. Special rules, +set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to +copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to +protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark. Project +Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you +charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission. If you +do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the +rules is very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose +such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and +research. They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do +practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks. Redistribution is +subject to the trademark license, especially commercial +redistribution. + + + +*** START: FULL LICENSE *** + +THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE +PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK + +To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free +distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work +(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project +Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project +Gutenberg-tm License available with this file or online at + www.gutenberg.org/license. + + +Section 1. General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic works + +1.A. By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to +and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property +(trademark/copyright) agreement. If you do not agree to abide by all +the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy +all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession. +If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the +terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or +entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8. + +1.B. "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark. It may only be +used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who +agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement. There are a few +things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works +even without complying with the full terms of this agreement. See +paragraph 1.C below. There are a lot of things you can do with Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement +and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. See paragraph 1.E below. + +1.C. The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation" +or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic works. Nearly all the individual works in the +collection are in the public domain in the United States. If an +individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are +located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from +copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative +works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg +are removed. Of course, we hope that you will support the Project +Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by +freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of +this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with +the work. You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by +keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project +Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others. + +1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern +what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most countries are in +a constant state of change. If you are outside the United States, check +the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement +before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or +creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project +Gutenberg-tm work. The Foundation makes no representations concerning +the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United +States. + +1.E. Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg: + +1.E.1. The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate +access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently +whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the +phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project +Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed, +copied or distributed: + +This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with +almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or +re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included +with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org + +1.E.2. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived +from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is +posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied +and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees +or charges. If you are redistributing or providing access to a work +with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the +work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1 +through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the +Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or +1.E.9. + +1.E.3. If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted +with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution +must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional +terms imposed by the copyright holder. Additional terms will be linked +to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the +permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work. + +1.E.4. Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this +work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm. + +1.E.5. Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this +electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without +prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with +active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project +Gutenberg-tm License. + +1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary, +compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any +word processing or hypertext form. However, if you provide access to or +distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than +"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version +posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org), +you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a +copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon +request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other +form. Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm +License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1. + +1.E.7. Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying, +performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works +unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9. + +1.E.8. You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing +access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided +that + +- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from + the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method + you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The fee is + owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he + has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the + Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty payments + must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you + prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax + returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and + sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the + address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to + the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation." + +- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies + you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he + does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm + License. You must require such a user to return or + destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium + and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of + Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any + money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the + electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days + of receipt of the work. + +- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free + distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works. + +1.E.9. If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm +electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set +forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from +both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael +Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark. Contact the +Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below. + +1.F. + +1.F.1. Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable +effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread +public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm +collection. Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain +"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or +corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual +property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a +computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by +your equipment. + +1.F.2. LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right +of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project +Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project +Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all +liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal +fees. YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT +LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE +PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3. YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE +TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE +LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR +INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH +DAMAGE. + +1.F.3. LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a +defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can +receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a +written explanation to the person you received the work from. If you +received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with +your written explanation. The person or entity that provided you with +the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a +refund. If you received the work electronically, the person or entity +providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to +receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund. If the second copy +is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further +opportunities to fix the problem. + +1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth +in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS', WITH NO OTHER +WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO +WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE. + +1.F.5. Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied +warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages. +If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the +law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be +interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by +the applicable state law. The invalidity or unenforceability of any +provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions. + +1.F.6. INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the +trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone +providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance +with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production, +promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works, +harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees, +that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do +or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm +work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any +Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause. + + +Section 2. Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm + +Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of +electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers +including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers. It exists +because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from +people in all walks of life. + +Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the +assistance they need are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's +goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will +remain freely available for generations to come. In 2001, the Project +Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure +and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations. +To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation +and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4 +and the Foundation information page at www.gutenberg.org + + +Section 3. Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive +Foundation + +The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit +501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the +state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal +Revenue Service. The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification +number is 64-6221541. Contributions to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent +permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws. + +The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S. +Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered +throughout numerous locations. Its business office is located at 809 +North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887. Email +contact links and up to date contact information can be found at the +Foundation's web site and official page at www.gutenberg.org/contact + +For additional contact information: + Dr. Gregory B. Newby + Chief Executive and Director + gbnewby@pglaf.org + +Section 4. Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg +Literary Archive Foundation + +Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide +spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of +increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be +freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest +array of equipment including outdated equipment. Many small donations +($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt +status with the IRS. + +The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating +charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United +States. Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a +considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up +with these requirements. We do not solicit donations in locations +where we have not received written confirmation of compliance. To +SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any +particular state visit www.gutenberg.org/donate + +While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we +have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition +against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who +approach us with offers to donate. + +International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make +any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from +outside the United States. U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff. + +Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation +methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of other +ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations. +To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate + + +Section 5. General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic +works. + +Professor Michael S. Hart was the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm +concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared +with anyone. For forty years, he produced and distributed Project +Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support. + +Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed +editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S. +unless a copyright notice is included. Thus, we do not necessarily +keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition. + +Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility: + + www.gutenberg.org + +This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm, +including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary +Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to +subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks. + + + +</pre> + + </body> +</html> |