diff options
Diffstat (limited to '78995-h')
| -rw-r--r-- | 78995-h/78995-h.htm | 28216 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | 78995-h/images/cover.jpg | bin | 0 -> 236473 bytes | |||
| -rw-r--r-- | 78995-h/images/frontispiece.jpg | bin | 0 -> 53699 bytes |
3 files changed, 28216 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/78995-h/78995-h.htm b/78995-h/78995-h.htm new file mode 100644 index 0000000..109e82b --- /dev/null +++ b/78995-h/78995-h.htm @@ -0,0 +1,28216 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> +<html lang="en"> +<head> +<title>Gordon at Khartoum | Project Gutenberg</title> +<meta charset="utf-8"> +<link rel="icon" href="images/cover.jpg" type="image/x-cover"> +<style> +body { + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 10%; +} +h1 +{ + text-align: center; + font-size: 225%; + font-weight: normal; + line-height: 1.2; + margin-top: 0; + margin-bottom: 0; + letter-spacing: 0.05em; + word-spacing: 0.6em; + clear: both; +} +h2 { + font-size: 100%; + text-align: center; + font-weight: normal; + line-height: 1.1; + margin-top: 2em; + page-break-before: always; + clear: both; +} +h2.nopb { + page-break-before: avoid; +} +h3 { + font-size: 100%; + margin-top: 2em; + margin-bottom: 1em; + font-weight: normal; + text-align: center; + page-break-before: avoid; + clear: both; +} +h3.space-above1 { + margin-top: 1em; +} +hr.chap { + color: Gray; + background-color: Gray; + width: 65%; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 2em; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; +} +hr.decor { + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + clear: both; +} +.pb { + page-break-before: always; +} +.x-ebookmaker hr.chap { display: none; visibility: hidden; } +.spaced13 { + line-height: 1.3; +} +.spaced15 { + line-height: 1.5; +} +.space-above { + margin-top: 4em; +} +.space-above2 { + margin-top: 2em; +} +.space-above1 { + margin-top: 1em; +} +.space-above15 { + margin-top: 1.5em; +} +.space-below1 { + margin-bottom: 1em; +} +.space-below15 { + margin-bottom: 1.5em; +} +.letter-spaced01 { + letter-spacing: 0.1em; +} +.letter-spaced015 { + letter-spacing: 0.15em; +} +.word-spaced03 { + word-spacing: 0.3em; +} +.nind { + text-indent: 0; +} +.salut { + text-indent: 0; +} +.salut2 { + text-indent: -1em; + padding-left: 1em; +} +.ind3 { + text-indent: 3em; +} +.hang1 { + text-indent: -1em; + padding-left: 1em; + } +.hang2 { + text-indent: -1em; + padding-left: 2.5em; + } +.publisher { + line-height: 1.3; + text-align: center; + text-indent: 0; +} +p { + text-align: justify; + text-indent: 1.5em; + line-height: 1.2; + max-width: 1200px; + margin: auto; + margin-top: .51em; + margin-bottom: .49em; +} +.xlarge { + font-size: 130%; +} +.large {font-size: 110%;} +.less {font-size: 95%;} +.med {font-size: 85%;} +.small {font-size: 75%;} +p.dcap { + text-indent: 0 + } +p.dcap:first-letter { + float: left; + margin: 0 0.1em 0 0; + font-size: 200%; + line-height: 0.85em + } +.dcap2 { + float: left; + margin: 0 0.1em 0 0; + line-height: 0.85em; + font-size: 200%; + } +.dcaplarge { + font-size: 200%; + } +.sc { + font-variant: small-caps; + } +.sc2 { + font-variant: small-caps; + font-size: 80%; + } +.center { + text-align: center; + text-indent: 0; + } +.tb { + text-align: center; + text-indent: 0; + word-spacing: 2em; + } +.pad-rightch3 { + padding-right: 3ch + } +.pad-rightch4 { + padding-right: 4ch + } +.pad-rightch5 { + padding-right: 5ch + } +.pad-rightch6 { + padding-right: 6ch + } +.pad-rightch7 { + padding-right: 7ch + } +.pad-rightch8 { + padding-right: 8ch + } +.pad-rightch9 { + padding-right: 9ch + } +.pad-rightch10 { + padding-right: 10ch + } +.pad-rightch11 { + padding-right: 11ch + } +.pad-rightch12 { + padding-right: 12ch + } +.pad-rightch13 { + padding-right: 13ch + } +.pad-rightch14 { + padding-right: 14ch + } +.pad-rightch15 { + padding-right: 15ch + } +.pad-rightch16 { + padding-right: 16ch + } +.pad-rightch18 { + padding-right: 18ch + } +.pad-rightch20 { + padding-right: 20ch + } +.pad-rightch22 { + padding-right: 22ch + } +.pad-rightch27 { + padding-right: 28ch + } +.right { + text-align: right; + } +.sch1 { + text-indent: 0; + text-align: center; + font-size: 85%; + margin-bottom: 1.5em; +} +.sch2 { + text-indent: 0; + text-align: center; + font-size: 85%; +} +.footnotes { + border: dashed 1px; + max-width: 1200px; + margin: auto; +} +.footnote { + margin-top: 0.5em; + margin-left: 10%; + margin-right: 5%; + font-size: 90%; +} +.footnote .label { + float: left; + margin-left: -12%; + text-align: right; +} +.fnanchor { + vertical-align: super; + font-size: .8em; + text-decoration: none; + font-style: normal; + font-weight: normal; +} +.pagenum { + position: absolute; + left: 92%; + font-size: small; + text-align: right; + font-style: normal; + font-weight: normal; + font-variant: normal; + letter-spacing: normal; + color: silver; + text-indent: 0; +} +.linegrp-container { + text-align: center + } +.linegrp { + display: inline-block; + text-align: left; + font-size: 90%; + } +.linegrp .group { + margin: 1em 0 1em 0 + } +.linegrp2 { + display: inline-block; + text-align: left; + } +.linegrp2 .group { + margin: 3em 0 3em 0 + } +.line { + padding-left: 3em; + line-height: 1.4em; + } +.indent0 { + text-indent: -3em + } +.indent4 { + text-indent: -1em + } +ul.index { + list-style-type: none; + width: 40em; + margin: auto; + } +.x-ebookmaker ul.index { + width: 100%; + } +ul.index > li { + margin-top: 0.3em; + text-indent: -1em; + padding-left: 1em; + } +ul.index > li.ifrst { + margin-top: 1.5em; + } +ul.simple1 { + list-style-type: none; + padding: 0.5em; + text-align: left; + max-width: 20em; + margin: auto; +} +ul.simple1 > li { + padding-top: 0.1em; + text-indent: -1em; + padding-left: 1em; +} +div.margins { + width: 1200px; + max-width: 100%; + margin: auto; +} +div.corr { + margin-top: 1.5em; + margin-bottom: 1.5em; +} +div.quote { + margin-top: 1.5em; + margin-bottom: 1.5em; +} +div.quote > p { + font-size: 90%; +} +div.page { + text-align: center; + page-break-before: always; +} +div.titlepage { + text-align: center; + page-break-before: always; + page-break-inside: avoid; + margin: auto; + margin-top: 4em; +} +.transnote { + background-color: #E6E6FA; + color: black; + font-size:smaller; + padding:0.5em; + font-family:sans-serif, serif; +} +table { + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + font-size: 100%; +} +table.toc { + max-width: 40em; + font-size: 90%; +} +table.toc td { + padding-top: 0.25em; + padding-bottom: 0.25em; + padding-right: 0.4em; +} +table td.sect1 { + padding-top: 1em; + padding-bottom: 0.5em; +} +div.rdate { + margin-right: 2em; + margin-left: auto; +} +div.rdate > p { + text-indent: 0; + margin-top: 0; + margin-bottom: 0; +} +div.signright { + margin-right: 2em; + margin-left: auto; +} +div.signright > p { + text-indent: 0; + margin-top: 0; + margin-bottom: 0; +} +div.signleft { + width: 14em; + margin-left: 0; + margin-right: auto; +} +div.signleft > p { + text-align: center; + text-indent: 0; + font-size:90%; +} +td, td > p { + margin-top: 0.25em; + line-height: 1.1em; +} +.tdl-top { + text-align: left; + vertical-align: top; + } +.tdr-top { + text-align: right; + vertical-align: top; + } +.tdr-bot { + text-align: right; + vertical-align: bottom; + } +.tdr {text-align: right;} +.tdc {text-align: center;} +.width20 { + width: 20em; +} +div.figcenter { + margin: auto; + margin-top: 1em; + margin-bottom: 1em; + text-align: center; + max-width: 100%; +} +figure { + display: inline-block; + margin: 0 auto; + text-align: center; + max-width: 100%; +} +figure p { + text-indent: 0; + margin-top: 0; + margin-bottom: 0; + text-align: center; + margin-left: auto; + margin-right: auto; + } +img { + width: inherit; + max-width: 100%; +} +.iw1 { width: 500px; } +</style> +</head> + +<body> +<div style='text-align:center'>*** START OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 78995 ***</div> + +<div class="margins"> +<div class="figcenter iw1"> +<figure id="cover"><a href="images/cover.jpg"><img alt="[Cover]" +src="images/cover.jpg"></a> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="page"> +<p class="center">GORDON AT KHARTOUM</p> +</div> + +<div class="figcenter iw1 pb"> +<figure id="fronti"><a href="images/frontispiece.jpg"><img alt="" +src="images/frontispiece.jpg"></a> +<p><em>Charles George Gordon<br> +1882</em> +</p> +</figure> +</div> + +<div class="titlepage"> +<h1><span class="letter-spaced01">GORDON AT</span><br> +KHARTOUM</h1> + +<p class="center spaced15">BEING A PERSONAL NARRATIVE OF<br> +EVENTS</p> + +<p class="center med spaced13 space-above1">IN CONTINUATION OF “A +SECRET HISTORY OF THE<br> +ENGLISH OCCUPATION OF EGYPT”</p> + +<p class="center spaced15 space-above15"><span class= +"med">BY</span><br> +WILFRID SCAWEN BLUNT</p> + +<div class="linegrp-container"> +<div class="linegrp2"> +<div class="group"> +<div class="line less indent0">“<em>We are an honest nation, but +our diplomatists</em></div> + +<div class="line less indent0"><em>are conies, and not officially +honest.</em>”—<span class="sc">Gordon</span>.</div> +</div> +</div> +</div> + +<p class="publisher"><span class= +"letter-spaced015 word-spaced03">LONDON: PUBLISHED BY</span><br> +STEPHEN SWIFT AND COL., LTD.<br> +MCMXI</p> +</div> + +<div class="page"> +<p class="center small space-above spaced13">CHISWICK PRESS: +CHARLES WHITTINGHAM AND CO.<br> +TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE, LONDON.</p> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2 class="large"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_v">[v]</span><a id="pref"></a>PREFACE</h2> + +<p class="dcap space-above15">IN the present volume, which is a +continuation of my “Secret History of the Occupation of Egypt,” I +take up once more the task of chronicling the events of my time. +Lord Cromer’s recent book, “Modern Egypt,” makes this a duty to the +truth which I feel ought not to be postponed, while there is also +the hope that by insistence it may still be possible to direct +those in power with us to adopt an attitude towards the Mohammedan +World less antagonistic than in the past to its thoughts and +feelings.</p> + +<p>The period treated here, between 1882 and 1886, is the darkest +of the whole Anglo-Egyptian record, a monument indeed of perverse +unwisdom recognized by all. But I doubt if it is yet fully +understood how immense a wrong was inflicted by our English +mismanagement of affairs at Cairo, not only on Egypt and the Upper +Nile, but on all Mohammedan lands hindered by it in their work of +liberal enlightenment, and thrown back for a whole generation on +lines of fanatical reaction. This I hope to make clear. Lord Cromer +would have us believe that it was contrary to our Government’s +desire that we remained on in Egypt in spite of repeated +declarations of an intention to withdraw. It will here be shown +that there was never any such intention at the Foreign Office, and +that if it existed in Mr. Gladstone’s mind it was of that barren +kind which refuses to take the means which alone can lead to the +desired result. With regard to the Soudan and the series of +barbarous campaigns which signalized those three disastrous years, +the explanation, too, has been made that these were<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_vi">[vi]</span> forced by circumstances upon our +Government, as was also the separation of the Upper from the Lower +Nile, a separation brought about under conditions of violent +disruption, which made it a permanent injury to Egypt and absolute +ruin to the Soudan, with the depopulation of whole provinces +through famine and disease and chronic warfare. It will be shown +that European action alone was the initial cause of the trouble, +that the fanatical character of the Soudanese revolt was due solely +to the intervention of the Christian Powers at Cairo and that its +extent and violence were increased by each successive step of +English intervention, also that to the refusal to make peace with +the Mahdi, either before or after the fall of Khartoum, may fairly +be ascribed all that subsequently happened of misfortune to the +tribes of the Upper River. These were realities that needed placing +in their proper perspective, and I have endeavoured in this volume +to present them as they to my knowledge were.</p> + +<p>My personal position while the chief tragedy of the time, +Gordon’s fatal mission to Khartoum, was being enacted was one +singularly advantageous for my present purpose of accurate +narration. Occupying no official post, I nevertheless found myself +a deeply interested spectator behind the official scenes in London, +as well as behind those of the Oriental world, and from time to +time playing a small part myself in the drama, close enough to the +chief personages to observe the details of their action, and in +near view of the machinery used for their stage effects. The diary, +which with an instinct of its future importance I kept carefully +written at the time, remains with me as a sure guide on which I can +rely for each day’s happenings, and this, in spite of its many +crudities of thought and expression,<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_vii">[vii]</span> and much in it that I am conscious is to my +own disadvantage, I have decided to print almost uncensored as it +stands. It is the strongest evidence I can offer of the accuracy of +my narrative, and the best refutation of the pseudo-history which +has grown up about the mission. On many points I am very conscious +that my diary needs apology. It was written with no thought of +publication, and contains harsh judgements of men and things with +many of which I have since come to disagree, violences of language +of which I am now ashamed, and expressions of feeling softened +since by years and by that tolerance of view taken in old age of +human insanities. Much in it I would willingly not have written, or +written otherwise, and much recording my own sayings and doings I +would suppress in publishing if it were not for the feeling that to +do so would impair its entire sincerity. In telling things +disadvantageous to others I could not in fairness be sparing of my +own mistakes. Therefore I leave all unexplained to its own +justification and the indulgence of my readers.</p> + +<p>On one point only have I thought it necessary to reconsider at +any length my attitude of the time. This is in respect of the blame +laid by me on Gordon for the failure of his mission on lines of +peace. As will be seen from my diary I was one of the few +Englishmen who, with a strong feeling of esteem and affection for +Gordon, disapproved from the first of his mission, suspecting what +was indeed the fact, that there was in it a political intrigue +connected with the continued occupation of Egypt, and I was one of +the very few who rejoiced at the failure of the relief expedition +and the fall of Khartoum. My belief, however, at the time, that +Gordon was himself through his soldier’s obstinacy mainly +responsible for the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_viii">[viii]</span> failure, and that he did, as was being +pretended by Ministers, exceed his instructions, wantonly changing +the character of his mission from a peaceful one to one of war, was +unjust, and I recognize the necessity of correcting my +misjudgement. The publication of Lord Cromer’s book four years ago, +with its exaggerated attack on Gordon on these very heads, roused +my suspicion and caused me to re-examine the evidence connected +with the whole matter, and I speedily discovered that, though +Gordon made without doubt many mistakes in its discharge, the prime +responsibility of the mission as one necessarily of war was +certainly not his, but that of those who sent him; also, on further +examination, that in spite of Lord Cromer’s denial the failure of +the mission was principally due to no other than Lord Cromer’s +self.</p> + +<p>I have consequently devoted several chapters of the present +volume to clearing up this much vexed matter, and I have added to +them, for the special benefit of Egyptian readers ignorant of +Gordon’s superlative moral merit and regarding him only as a too +zealous agent of the British Government, and so their enemy, a +memoir of this great man’s life and character, gathered in part +from his published letters scattered through many works now out of +print and notably from those wonderful letters to his sister +collected by Dr. Hill, in part from my own recollection of him, and +that of others who knew him personally. In this, which has been to +me a labour of love as well as of reparation, I have been +powerfully assisted by Gordon’s nephew and literary heir, Colonel +Louis Gordon, by his sole surviving sister, Mrs. Moffitt, and by +his niece, Miss Gordon, who are the chief living authorities on all +things concerning him. These have not only put me on the track of +all published knowledge, but have been good enough<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_ix">[ix]</span> to entrust to me many important +documents not hitherto printed, which will be found either in the +text of this volume or the Appendix. One of these is of deciding +value to the case, a letter which Lord Cromer in his +<em>apologia</em> seems to have forgotten, and which fixes on +himself the responsibility of the mission as one far wider in scope +than has hitherto been admitted.</p> + +<p>If I have anything to add to these few words of preface it is +this—I have been reproached with lack of patriotism in that I have +made it my business of late years to denounce the errors and +political misdeeds of my fellow countrymen in Egypt. In answer to +this I can only say that I belong to a generation of Englishmen +holding an idea of patriotism entirely different from that now +accepted, and one that I think saner. According to the teaching of +my youth the patriotic idea was essentially connected with the love +of the land of one’s birth, the passion of courage which prompted +Thermopylae and Bannockburn and the thousand and one battles where +men have stood up in defence of their homes against invading +strangers; also with that other moral courage which strengthened a +man to oppose in speech the folly of his fellow men whom he saw +doing dishonour to that land. It had nothing whatever to do with +the modern idea, now prevalent among Englishmen, of solidarity with +the enterprises, often criminal, of the cosmopolitan finance of +London and Liverpool and Manchester, which has usurped control over +our lives and honour in its dealings with our national affairs +abroad, which controls our press, manipulates our parliament, and +uses our ancient and honourable English name for its base +un-English purposes. There is no lack of patriotism in refusing to +bow to this new leadership in evil, or in denouncing its ungodly +doings.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_x">[x]</span>I am by instinct of +birth a conservative to my inmost fibre, that is to say a believer +in tradition and the value of all that is ancient in our national +institutions and creeds and moralities. I remember the disgust of +my older Tory friends when, under Semitic influence thirty-five +years ago, the new-fangled style of Empress was proposed to be +added to the time-honoured title inherited by our Sovereign Lady +Queen Victoria, and when the British Empire first began to be +talked about as an improvement in nomenclature on our long +sufficing Kingdom of England. What was good enough for the +“spacious days of great Elizabeth” was surely, we protested, good +enough for us. We wanted none of the imperial nonsense. As to a +transfer of our patriotic loyalty from our good island realm of +England to a colonial monarchy beyond the seas, it seemed not only +a vulgarity but a contradiction in physical terms. We did not spare +our mockery and contempt for the whole “Brummagem” innovation.</p> + +<p>This is my sentimental view of British imperialism still, nor is +it a matter of sentiment alone with me. My reading of history has +taught, and practical experience has confirmed to me the fact that +the task undertaken by a nation of ruling other nations against +their will is the most certain step for it upon the road to +national ruin. It is impossible to exercise tyrannical authority +abroad and retain a proper respect for the dignity of liberty at +home. The two things are not permanently compatible. The virus of +lawlessness in foreign lands infects the body politic at home by a +gradual process of contempt for human brotherhood and equal right, +which are the basis of all law and the only guarantee of freedom in +free nations. Nor, on the other hand, can a community afford to +distribute its energies in a hundred different +directions<span class="pagenum" id="Page_xi">[xi]</span> without +injury to its mental balance and danger of intellectual decay. The +British Empire of the present day is being run on lines of +speculation which is often sheer gambling. It has lost the sense of +all economy in its finances, and all moderation in its spendthrift +ways. How can it be moderate with a thousand speculative ventures +to uphold in all four quarters of the globe? Moreover—and this is +perhaps the most dangerous feature of it all—the vanity of +imperialism, of being members of an imperial caste, is rapidly +teaching Englishmen to rely, wherever possible, for their living +upon the labour of others rather than their own. The great Crown +Colonies, the Indian Empire, and the South African federation are +all slave communities in disguise, where white men do not work +themselves but live by “native” labour. The example of their sloth +is gaining rapid ground at home, and soon all will be too proud to +do any manual service. The virile part of the community is flocking +already to lands where they can live in less laborious ways; the +feebler part remains to propagate and starve at home. Who shall say +that England is not on a perilous downward path?</p> + +<p>What moves me most to anger is to note how, just as four hundred +years ago the Spanish race, urged by the speculative lust of gold +and a belief in their own supreme imperial and Christianizing +mission, rushed out upon the innocent New World and enslaved and +slew its primitive peoples happier far than they, so we +English-speaking men enslave and slay in the name of +civilization—here, there, and everywhere—races less well armed, but +in other respects more fit for survival in the spaces they have +primitively occupied than ourselves. The work of subjugation goes +on under a score of false pretences;<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_xii">[xii]</span> and these, officially recorded, remain for +the misleading of posterity in the pages of our printed Blue Books. +History thus comes to be written in a sense suited to the +self-satisfaction of those who would like to think themselves God’s +messengers to an unenlightened heathendom, while in reality they +are only gathering in its wealth, and their crimes of conquest are +concealed. In the days of Spain’s madness there was a single honest +monk who denounced his fellow countrymen for their misdeeds, and +dared to love the Indians more than his own people, because he saw +these suffering atrocities of injustice at their conquerors’ hands. +He was not popular in Castile for his plain speaking. Yet +where—among the nations—is imperial Spain to-day? And which has the +better title now to be called a patriot, Las Casas or Pizarro?</p> + +<p>There will be found at the end of the volume an <a href= +"#app">Appendix</a> containing a selection of papers forming the +<em>pièces justificatives</em> of this portion of my history. Some +of these are of considerable intrinsic value, others of less +importance but needed for the refutation in detail of the historic +inaccuracies of Lord Cromer’s book, and in answer to certain +remarks found in it concerning myself. Such especially are the +additional evidence here brought forward of the Khedive Tewfik’s +connection with the riots at Alexandria and Tantah in 1882, which, +without reason given, Lord Cromer has pronounced to be unproved; +and my correspondence with 10, Downing Street, which he has in a +few sentences attempted to discredit. The correspondence makes my +position towards Mr. Gladstone absolutely clear, as does, in +another direction, my more generally interesting correspondence +with my Oriental friends.</p> + +<p>The pencil drawing of Gordon, reproduced as<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_xiii">[xiii]</span> frontispiece to the volume, is by +Edward Clifford, and is now in the collection of the National +Portrait Gallery. Though inadequate as displaying Gordon’s more +popularly heroic attitude, it is the only one that at all reveals +his inner and more mystic mind, or which I recognize as a true +presentment of the man as I personally remember him.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">W. S. B.</p> +</div> + +<p><em>13th September</em> 1911.</p> + +<div class="signleft"> +<p>Twenty-ninth anniversary<br> +of Tel-el-Kebir.</p> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2 class="large"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_xv">[xv]</span>CONTENTS</h2> + +<table class="toc"> +<tr> +<td> +</td> +<td> +</td> +<td class="tdr med">PAGE</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="tdl-top hang1 sc"><a href="#fronti">General +Gordon</a> +</td> +<td class="tdr-bot"><em>Frontispiece</em> +</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="tdl-top hang1 sc"><a href= +"#pref">Preface</a> +</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">v</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="tdc large sect1">CHAPTERS</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#c01">I.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">The Dufferin Settlement</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">1</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#c02">II.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Sir Evelyn Baring arrives at +Cairo</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">38</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#c03">III.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Gordon’s Work on the White Nile</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">87</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#c04">IV.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Gordon in Palestine</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">122</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#c05">V.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Gordon’s last Mission</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">144</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#c06">VI.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Was Gordon disobedient?</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">181</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#c07">VII.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Excitement about Gordon in London</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">207</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#c08">VIII.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">My Exclusion from Egypt</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">245</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#c09">IX.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Constantinople in 1884</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">284</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#c10">X.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Gordon’s death. Chaos</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">344</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#c11">XI.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Randolph Churchill and the Fourth +Party</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">412</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#c12">XII.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">The General Election of 1885—Randolph +at the India Office—Drummond Wolff’s Mission</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">471</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="tdl-top hang1 sc"><a href="#c13">Note</a> +about the Mahdi’s Death</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">505</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="3" class="tdc large sect1">APPENDICES</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#appa">A.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Unpublished Gordon Papers</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">509</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#appb">B.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Mr. Blunt’s Oriental +Correspondence</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">539</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#appc">C.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Correspondence with Downing +Street</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">568</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#appd">D.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Correspondence with Lord Randolph +Churchill</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">608</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#appe">E.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Arabi’s Programme of 1883, and +Mohammed Abdu’s Views</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">617</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#appf">F.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Extracts from Lady Anne Blunt’s +Diary</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">627</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td class="tdr-top"><a href="#appg">G.</a> +</td> +<td class="tdl-top hang1 sc">Letters to Mr. Blunt alluded to in, +and exemplifying, the Text</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">630</td> +</tr> + +<tr> +<td colspan="2" class="tdl-top hang1 sc"><a href="#ind">Index</a> +</td> +<td class="tdr-bot">645</td> +</tr> +</table> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<p class="center xlarge pb space-above"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_1">[1]</span>GORDON AT KHARTOUM</p> + +<h2 class="nopb"><a id="c01"></a>CHAPTER I</h2> + +<p class="sch1">THE DUFFERIN SETTLEMENT</p> + +<p class="dcap">I TAKE up my narrative of Egyptian events where I +left them at the end of 1882.</p> + +<p>The restoration of the Khedive Tewfik at Cairo had been +accomplished by Lord Wolseley’s army, and Egypt, prostrate and +dumb, lay like a woman betrayed waiting the fate to be allotted to +her at the hand of her despoiler. Arabi’s trial over, it became a +matter of supreme interest for all of us who had interested +ourselves in the National movement as one of progress and reform to +speculate on what was to be the ultimate fortune or ill-fortune of +the Egyptians meted out to them by Mr. Gladstone’s +Government—whether they would return to their ancient slavery under +the Circassians, or whether, as we hoped, Gladstone would make good +his promises of favouring the development of their political +institutions, and helping them on their road to self-government—or +whether, again, they would meet the fate of so many other nations +of the East, and become permanently incorporated in the British +Empire.</p> + +<p>For this last course all the Imperialists of England, headed by +“The Times,” were crying out, and it was generally believed that +Bismarck, then Lord Paramount of Europe, would consent to it, while +France, though sullen and vexed with herself for having missed an +opportunity of acquisition she had long marked out as her own, was +not prepared for effectual remonstrance. Her seizure of Tunis the +year before, under circumstances of even less legality,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_2">[2]</span> closed her mouth for any moral +preaching, as did the avowed selfishness of her attitude towards +Egypt which had been even more blatantly than ours that of advocate +there of financial and foreign commercial interests.</p> + +<p>I do not think, however, that it was really within the power of +our Liberal Government all at once and so entirely to falsify their +pledges. A protocol of disinterestedness had been signed by Lord +Dufferin at Constantinople at the meeting of the Conference the +previous summer, which in the most public manner possible engaged +England to make her intervention one for the general European good, +and not merely for British advantage. Lord Granville, too, was +bound over and over again by his declarations to the theory that +the English army had been sent to Egypt solely to restore order and +maintain the <em>status quo</em>, while both the Khedive’s +authority and the Sultan’s had been invoked to give the +intervention a colour of legality, and Sir Beauchamp Seymour in a +solemn document, published a fortnight after the bombardment of +Alexandria and before landing troops, had engaged the faith of +England not to attempt conquest or in any way injure either the +religion or the liberties of the Egyptians. To annex or proclaim a +protectorate would consequently have been a huge moral lapse +Gladstone was not prepared for, though a certain section of the +Cabinet, headed by Hartington and Chamberlain, were pushing hard in +that direction, while the Foreign Office, refusing to accept the +evidence of the new facts revealed at the trial, clung to its false +theory of the causes of the war, which it needed as an excuse, and +hardened its heart against all repentance for its past mistakes. +Moreover—and for this I think I may claim to have helped to +avert<span class="pagenum" id="Page_3">[3]</span> from Egypt the +supreme disaster of annexation—the non-conformist conscience of the +old-fashioned Liberals of England was now awake to the iniquity of +the war, and was indignant at the betrayal by Gladstone of his +Midlothian principles, and was insisting with him that liberty +should not be altogether suppressed on the Nile. This was a +consideration which could not but affect a politician of +Gladstone’s temperament; and there was yet another reason perhaps +stronger than all the rest with him, though I as yet only half +suspected it, his economic prudence as ex-Chancellor of the +Exchequer, which made him shrink from incurring full responsibility +for England for the liabilities of a country then believed to be on +the point of bankruptcy. Egypt from that point of view might be a +burden involving money expenditure for many years as well as +international trouble, and this consideration in all probability +decided him. It is certain that, in subsequent years, his scruples +about retaining Egypt became less and less imperative in almost +exact correspondence with the revival of the financial credit.</p> + +<p class="space-above15">Be this as it may, the opportunity of +English annexation was, fortunately for the Egyptians, let slip in +1882, and did not again recur in Mr. Gladstone’s lifetime; nor, let +us hope, will another be found in the still less scrupulous future +reserved for the British Empire. Egypt, though wounded almost to +death, did not die as a nation with the destruction of her national +army at Tel-el-Kebir, and still preserves her historic identity as +a legally self-governing State, technically dependent on no +European Power. The settlement of her future as such was the +outcome of the divergent ideas and<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_4">[4]</span> motives and pledges and interests just +enumerated, and, as all the world knows, was entrusted to Lord +Dufferin, already in Egypt, in the opening months of the year 1883. +Dufferin’s task, it may be admitted, was a difficult one. It was to +effect a compromise which should at the same time satisfy Europe, +keep nominal faith with the Khedive, and have at least an +appearance of giving back to the Egyptians the political liberties +they had for a moment won and were now once more deprived of. At +the time of his appointment I had considerable confidence in +Dufferin. I had known him personally for more than twenty years, +from the time indeed when, as an attaché to the Legation at Athens, +I had made his acquaintance on his return from his Nile tour in the +winter of 1859-60, and I knew that his sympathy with the fellahin +had then been great. He was in those days an interesting and very +charming young man of not much more than thirty, and he had spent +most of his time at Athens with us at the Legation, joining our +rides and excursions, and taking part in our mounted paper-chases +which took place twice a week, as well as in such social amusements +as the Corps Diplomatique at Athens afforded. His mother, herself +the most charming of women, was travelling with him, and both had +been especially kind to me in a way I did not forget, and I am glad +to think that during the whole of Lord Dufferin’s long life the +pleasant relations thus begun between us were maintained as often +as we met.</p> + +<p>In the year following he had received his first public +appointment, that of Commissioner to Syria at the time of the +Maronite massacres, and he had returned to Athens after them, and I +remembered the details of the settlement he had so successfully +arranged for the Lebanon. By this he had pledged<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_5">[5]</span> himself to the principle of +provincial autonomy under Ottoman sovereignty, while a little later +the weight of his opinion had been given to our Government when it +insisted with the French that they should withdraw their army of +occupation from Syria. It is curious how closely parallel were, in +fact, the two cases of intervention—the French intervention in +Syria in 1860 and the English intervention in Egypt in 1882. It +seemed to me, therefore, that he might be trusted to oppose +anything like a renewal of the old Turco-Circassian tyranny, and +also to respect the independent administrative rights of the +Egyptian people. His task, however, as I have said was a difficult +one, indeed almost impossible. In order to give back their liberty +to the fellahin, or indeed to introduce any of the reforms +advocated by Arabi and his friends, it would have been necessary to +reinstate, if not Arabi himself, at least a Nationalist Ministry, +for the Turco-Circassian clique, which Wolseley had put back into +power, were the enemies of all reform, while the Khedive himself, +who had betrayed his constitutional pledges, could no longer be +trusted to work honestly with a constitutional Government. He would +need to be replaced by some other prince who had not forfeited the +confidence of his people.</p> + +<p>Such a course, though difficult from the Foreign Office point of +view, would have met with little obstacle in Egypt itself. Indeed, +it would have been a quite simple affair. Tewfik, at that time, had +absolutely no friend in the country outside the circle of his own +small palace clique, and hardly a voice would have been raised for +him if his retirement had been insisted on as a political +necessity, not even in all probability his own. Pensioned, he would +not unwillingly have returned to private life, for his +experience<span class="pagenum" id="Page_6">[6]</span> of the +Khedivial dignity had not been such as to cause him to be enamoured +of it. Two courses would then have been open in regard to his +successor. Either the recognized order of succession might have +been followed, which would have placed the present Khedive Abbas, +still a child, upon the throne, under a Regency; or the older order +of succession might have been reverted to, which would have given +it to Prince Halim. In neither case would there have been +difficulty in restoring a constitutional regime. Probably the best +arrangement, if our Foreign Office could have been got to consent +to it, would have been the first, with Arabi for Regent. Arabi was +still, in spite of his defeat and the poor fight of it he had made +at Tel-el-Kebir, most widely popular, and could have been trusted +to work honestly with those plans of material and moral reform +which England professed to have at heart, not indeed as Minister, +for he lacked the administrative ability, but as exercising by +delegation the duties of a constitutional head of the State. For +that no Egyptian could have been better fitted, he being a +large-minded man as well as a good Moslem. Nor would England’s +legitimate influence have been a loser by it. Arabi, in spite of +the quarrel forced upon him by the Foreign Office, had always +refused to see an enemy in the English people. He had nursed +himself to the last in the belief that, if only the British public +could be got to know the truth, it could not fail to sympathize. +England, it must be remembered, was traditionally believed in +Egypt, prior to 1882, to be the universal patron of liberal and +national movements throughout the world, and in an especial manner +the friend of Islam. Arabi had been bred in that tradition, and had +to the last moment, in common with most<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_7">[7]</span> Egyptians, imagined that the quarrel was due to +a mistake as to facts. The rectification of it would therefore have +seemed natural to him and to all, and would have restored the +general Egyptian goodwill.</p> + +<p>For a moment we thought that Dufferin, whom the disclosures +connected with the trial had made acquainted with the true history +of the war, would have recommended this enlightened course, and it +would have saved him and his employers at the Foreign Office much +subsequent trouble had he had the courage to insist on it. He was +perfectly aware of Tewfik’s real character, and he was aware also +of Arabi’s merits. Indeed, so far had his confidence gone in the +honesty and patriotism of the defeated National leader that he had +got him at the moment of his leaving for Ceylon to draw up a +Memorandum of Reform for Egypt, the text of which, though doubtless +existing at the Foreign Office, has never been published. It will +be found at the end of this chapter, a copy of it having been +furnished to me by Arabi from Ceylon the following summer. Also I +had learned from General Charles Gordon, in a conversation I had +had with him, while Arabi was still in prison, in December 1882, +that the idea of Arabi’s rehabilitation and recall to Egypt was at +the time contemplated in Downing Street; while, as will be seen +further on, I received additional confirmation of it as being in +Gladstone’s mind in a message received from him as late as the +summer of 1883. We were therefore not without justification in the +hope we reposed in Dufferin, though it is improbable that the +Foreign Office, obstinate and deeply compromised, was ever +converted from its hostility to the National leader. Indeed it is +pretty certain that, whatever representations<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_8">[8]</span> of the truth Dufferin may have made or +whatever new suggestions offered, the policy he was instructed by +Lord Granville to pursue remained unyielding; and the publication a +few months later of Dufferin’s famous despatch of 7th February did +but register a foregone conclusion.<a id="FNanchor_1"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_1" class="fnanchor">[1]</a></p> + +<p>Nevertheless, it is worth while to put on record what evidence +we possess of a wiser and more liberal policy having been +contemplated at least for a moment by some of those in power. Not +to lay too much stress on the hopes held out to us by Dufferin at +the time of the compromise of Arabi’s trial, which may have been +dictated by an unauthorized desire to persuade us, it is certain +that Arabi’s early return to Egypt was believed in not only at +Cairo at the end of the year 1882, but also in London. Gordon’s +evidence on this head is decisive, and shows that it was +entertained in official quarters. Though looked upon in Downing +Street as “not clothed in the rightest of minds,”<a id= +"FNanchor_2"></a><a href="#Footnote_2" class="fnanchor">[2]</a> +Gordon’s opinion on Egyptian affairs was considered worth taking. +He was in occasional correspondence with Lord Northbrook, and he +was intimate<a id="FNanchor_3"></a><a href="#Footnote_3" class= +"fnanchor">[3]</a> with Reginald Brett (the present Lord Esher), +just then transferred with Lord Hartington, whose private secretary +he was, to the War Office, while Wolseley also was his friend. +There was talk,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_9">[9]</span> too, +already at the time, as we shall presently see, of Gordon’s +possible return as Governor-General to the Soudan, and he was in an +excellent position to hear and know. What therefore he told me in +the conversation referred to cannot but be convincing of the fact. +The circumstances under which it took place were these.</p> + +<p>It will be remembered by readers of my first volume, “A Secret +History of the English Occupation of Egypt,” that while the +campaign of Tel-el-Kebir was still in progress I received a letter +from General Gordon dated Cape Town, 3rd August 1882, the text of +which is there given, expressing to me the strongest sympathy with +my view of the iniquitous causes of the war, and ending with the +words, “As for Arabi, whatever may become of him individually, he +will live for centuries in the people; they will never be ‘your +obedient servants’ again.” A copy of this letter I had forwarded to +Gladstone, and it had not been without effect on him in what had +happened subsequently in Egypt. To Gordon I had sent in reply a +printed copy of my private correspondence with Downing Street, and +the article on the Egyptian Revolution, published in the September +number of the “Nineteenth Century Review,” and had received a +second letter from him which I here print.</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">“En route to England 21 <em>Oct.</em> 1882.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut">“<span class="sc">My dear Mr. Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p class="ind3">“<span class="sc">Thank</span> you for your kind +letter Sept. 7, received as I was leaving Cape Town. Sorry you have +been abused, but you are not the worse because the world does so, +neither are you better when it praises you. You are as you are. +Thanks for XIX century and pamphlet, which I read with interest. I +have a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_10">[10]</span> conviction +that things will turn out well for the Egyptian people in the long +run, and though our people may suffer, it will be for welfare of +the human race. I cannot now write on the subject, for I have an +idea that things are ruled for the best, by an overruling Power, +and that to put any say in what He does seems presumptuous on my +part; in fact if one took up the cudgels for the oppressed +every-where, one would have too much to do. I may meet you some +day, and perhaps can enlighten you on some subjects, such as why +the Joint Note 9 Jan<sup>ry</sup> was written, from <em>my</em> +point of view. As for Dilke I think he is an impostor in a great +measure. With kind regards. Believe me, Yrs. sincerely,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">“C. G. <span class="sc">Gordon</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p class="space-above15">“<em>P.S.</em>—I have seen papers up to 26 +Oct. and it seems H. M. G. have just fought to reinstate the +Parasite ring of Pachas. As for Raouf and Ismail [Eyoub] Pachas’ +being on Arabi’s trial, it means simply the condemnation of Arabi. +I know both these two men well, they would shrink at nothing, and +are the representative men of the Pacha clique.”</p> +</div> + +<p>It was therefore natural that, on his return to England in +November I should be one of the first persons upon whom the General +called. My diary, which at the time I had unfortunately +interrupted, fails me in regard to the exact details of the visit +paid me; and I have no more than a memorandum to the effect that +Gordon called at my house in James Street, Buckingham Gate, on 5th +December, and that not finding me at home he left his name with my +servant at the door characteristically thus: “General Gordon or +Gordon Pasha. I daresay you have heard of him before”; and with it +a note<span class="pagenum" id="Page_11">[11]</span> written on a +sheet of my own paper. But this I have preserved and it fixes the +date. It says: “I will call at Buckingham Gate 9 a.m. Friday, if +you could be in. I sincerely hope you can recover the £4,000 you +spent on Arabi [alluding to the costs of the trial]. I will give £5 +a year till you are repaid. It would be a pleasure to do it and no +risk, for Arabi will be back in Egypt within two years, and he will +repay it. I hope that the inferior prisoners will not be forgotten, +for Riaz and Co. will do their best to crush them, for Riaz’ fate +depends on their extinction. My address, 68, Elm Park Road, +Chelsea.”</p> + +<p>It must have been therefore on Friday the 8th December that +Gordon called again, and, as I remember well, breakfasted with us +and spent the whole forenoon in talk, mainly on Egypt and the +Soudan, but also on India and the relations generally between +Europe and the East. With regard to Egypt my recollection is +distinct that we were in entire agreement in our sympathy with the +“rebellion,” and our condemnation of Tewfik. In my “Nineteenth +Century” article I had engaged myself to write a sequel to it, but +I remember that he advised me to leave this promise for the present +unfulfilled. “You do not require it,” he said, “for your own +justification, and, as for the Government, they are resolved now to +do justice. You may have perfect faith in Mr. Gladstone, and I know +that he intends to restore Arabi as soon as public opinion shall +have cooled down, and he can do it without too sudden a reversal of +his policy. Arabi will be back in Egypt in a couple of years, and +you can then write your history far more effectively than now.”</p> + +<p>This is my recollection of the visit, and it is confirmed to me +on the point in question by a second note received from him at the +close of the year bidding<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_12">[12]</span> me farewell just before his leaving England +for Jerusalem, which letter I have also preserved.</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">“5 Rockstone Place, Southampton 2, 26, 12, 82.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut">“<span class="sc">My dear Mr. Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p class="ind3">“<span class="sc">Thank</span> you for your kind +note. I am sorry not to have seen you and Lady Blunt before I left. +I go tomorrow and will do my best about the Sheiks.<a id= +"FNanchor_4"></a><a href="#Footnote_4" class="fnanchor">[4]</a> +Above is my safe address. I will write you from Palestine.</p> + +<p>“I have to a small degree tried to use the verse: ‘If thou seest +the violent oppression of the poor, or the subversion of justice, +marvel not at it, for the Higher than the Highest regardeth it.’ +Ecc. v, 8.</p> + +<p>“Not that I am inclined to be silent on these matters if I think +I can do any good, but it comforts me to feel that one can get +access to a Higher than they.</p> + +<p>“Arabi will be back in a couple of years, say in 18 months.</p> + +<p>“I think things are very critical in Cairo, and the day I called +on you, I went to Brett and begged him to urge Government to +assemble the Notables at once. Napoleon I suffered far more from +the revolts of Cairo than from the troops. Colvin is to be +recalled.</p> + +<p>“Believe me with kindest regards to Lady Blunt and yourself, and +with hopes for the future thro’ your efforts, Yours sincerely,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">“C. G. <span class="sc">Gordon</span>.”</p> +</div> +</div> + +<p>This taken with the rest is, I think, decisive. As to the +Soudan, my recollection of Gordon’s<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_13">[13]</span> talk is that he expressed himself at the time +in entire sympathy with the Mahdi as the popular leader of a revolt +against an iniquitous Government, but that, whereas I, sharing the +views of many Egyptian Nationalists in 1882, was for giving the +Soudanese complete independence, Gordon insisted on the retention +of Khartoum as a necessity for Egypt in connection with the Nile +water-supply, and as an outpost to be held politically. On this +point alone we disagreed.</p> + +<p>Arabi’s memorandum, drawn up for Lord Dufferin, is another +important bit of evidence. It shows that at least the question of a +change of Khedive had been presented to, and must have been +considered by, him; nor is it to be supposed that the intention of +a complete pardon for the writer can have been absent from the +diplomatist to whom it was addressed. It is certain, at any rate, +that Dufferin was influenced by it in his scheme of reforms, and +was then favourably impressed, and to this I can testify of my own +knowledge, for I more than once had opportunities in after years of +learning the high opinion Dufferin entertained of the ex-National +leader. The passage in the memorandum of immediate importance to +the point we are considering is this:</p> + +<p>“The question,” says the memorandum, “of appointing a new ruler +(Waly) is an important one, and I will lay before you my own views +and those of my comrades. I say: that the family of Ibrahim Pasha, +son of Mohammed Ali, is absolutely worthless for the sovereignty; +no matter how they might be controlled by a Constitution, for they +are of notoriously corrupt principles. In my opinion there is a +choice of two courses. 1. To appoint Halim Pasha, son of Mohammed +Ali Pasha, Waly of Egypt, under the conditions before laid down +[<em>i.e.</em>,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_14">[14]</span> those +of a Constitution]. He is a man who has been tried by misfortune, +and has tasted the bitterness of injustice, and has reached the age +of about fifty-five years, and I believe that such a man might try +to win the sympathy of the people by justice and kindness. 2. The +other course is to appoint as Waly for Egypt one of her own men of +the National Party whose deeds have borne witness to their goodness +of disposition and peaceful character. But, as to any idea of +appointing a foreign ruler, I say that, as the mass of the +Egyptians are Moslems, with the exception of the Coptic section +(and these are the same as the Egyptians in their dealings and ways +of life), I believe that the appointment of a foreign Waly would +not suit the temper of the Egyptians, but would perhaps lead to +trouble among them.”</p> + +<p>This, though not conforming to strict official phraseology, goes +to the root of the matter, and is full of common sense. Let us +consider how it would have been if Dufferin had made the idea of +such a change of ruler his own, as he made other recommendations of +the memorandum his own, and had pressed it as a necessity of the +Egyptian case upon the Foreign Office if an honest settlement was +to be made and the British troops withdrawn from Egypt. As regards +Egypt proper, the appointment of Halim would have solved the whole +difficulty of popular disaffection. Halim, who was a really +estimable man, bore a good repute in Egypt. His domestic life was a +blameless one. His wife, a woman of high distinction with a good +European education, would have helped him in his relations with the +resident foreign element, and he himself was sufficiently +Europeanized to play the part needed of a modern Egyptian ruler. He +had none of the vices of the elder branch of the family of Mohammed +Ali. He was<span class="pagenum" id="Page_15">[15]</span> neither a +spendthrift nor a voluptuary, nor a coveter of his neighbour’s +goods, nor on any point a law breaker. Moreover there would have +been no difficulty in obtaining the Sultan’s consent to the +appointment. Halim was in some sort the Sultan’s own candidate, as +also the candidate of most of the European Powers. He could have +worked easily with the National Party and the Constitution, and +thus the British garrison could have been at once withdrawn. If to +this had been added, what was talked of at the time, the +appointment of Sir Charles Wilson as Malet’s successor at the +British Agency, even a preponderance of English influence in Egypt +could have been secured. Wilson was a strong sympathizer with the +Nationalists, and his advice would have been followed. The +suggestion of Halim was an entirely wise one, suited to every +necessity of the case, as would have been the other of Abbas with +Arabi for Regent.</p> + +<p>Above all it would have saved Egypt and England from those +terrible disasters which beset both countries with a pursuing curse +in regard to the Soudan during the next three years. That the +intervention in Egypt was the direct cause of the revolt in the +Soudan is certain. One of the most fatal acts of the Dual Control +had been to give to the Soudan in 1880, as Gordon’s successor, a +reactionary and wholly corrupt Circassian Governor-General, Raouf +Pasha, and it had been through his tyranny and incapacity that the +country had fallen into disorder and the Mahdi had gained his first +adherents. Two years later Arabi’s first administrative act when he +became War Minister at Cairo had been to recall Raouf,<a id= +"FNanchor_5"></a><a href="#Footnote_5" class="fnanchor">[5]</a> and +send a really competent man, Abd-el-Kader<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_16">[16]</span> Pasha, to replace him. Under Abd-el-Kader the +rebellion had been localized, Khartoum scientifically fortified, +and order restored everywhere but in the western provinces. +Moreover Arabi had put himself into epistolary communication with +the Mahdi, and had established a <em>modus vivendi</em> between him +and the National Government in view of the common menace of +European and Christian aggression in Lower Egypt. It was the +landing of English troops at Alexandria that gave its fanatical +character to the Mahdist rebellion, while it also denuded the +Soudan of its best troops recalled to Egypt to repel the menace of +invasion. But for Tel-el-Kebir, the utmost misfortune that could +have befallen Egypt in that direction would have been the loss of +the Bahr el Ghazal province and Kordofan. Even now, after the +defeat of Tel-el-Kebir, all could have been repaired had the change +of Khedive been resolved on according to Arabi’s suggestion, with a +recall of the Nationalist leaders, and an end put to the tyrannical +Circassian regime at Cairo. Terms could easily have been come to +with the Mahdi which would have secured Khartoum and the Eastern +Soudan from attack. The Christian army withdrawn from Cairo, the +Mahdi’s rebellion would have lost its fanatical <em>raison +d’être</em>. It will be seen later that Arabi, even before the +defeat of Hicks, was quite ready to abandon Kordofan and the +Equatorial provinces, while there would have been no difficulty in +retaining Khartoum, where the chief weakness of the garrison in +1883 lay in the fact that the troops composing it were Arabi’s +ex-soldiers devoted to him and wholly disaffected to Tewfik. For +the issue of bloodshed and destruction witnessed for a generation +in the Soudan, the obstinacy of our Foreign Office in retaining +Tewfik was directly responsible.<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_17">[17]</span> It was one of those fatal mistakes which +statesmen make and persist in because they are too proud to own +their error.</p> + +<p class="space-above15">Was there ever a greater tragedy of +errors? And all for what? It is probable that the real reason why +Tewfik was maintained in his place as Khedive, instead of being +pensioned and sent to join his father in an exile more or less +honourable, was neither a consideration of Egypt’s interests nor +that of England’s interests, nor yet of the interests of Europe, +nor so much as those of the bondholders. None of the upholders of +these interests had any belief or trust in Tewfik as a prince +capable of maintaining order at Cairo, or of restoring Egyptian +credit, or even of efficiently serving British interests. He was +known to have none of the qualities of a strong ruler, and he was +popular with no one, native or European. As a puppet prince he +might have his uses, but the situation demanded something more than +a puppet prince, and he was good for no other purpose, political or +financial. No. The probability is that the real reason with +Gladstone’s Cabinet was that Tewfik’s retirement would have +entailed the retirement also of Lord Granville, and Lord Granville +was too popular a member of the Cabinet to be forced into such a +step against his will; also that Lord Granville, a needy man, much +in debt, and dependent on his official salary to eke out an +insufficient income, was not prepared for the personal sacrifice. +The fiction of Tewfik’s loyalty and of Arabi’s rebellion had +therefore to be persisted in and upheld. It could not be +contemplated that a Minister should admit an error which had been +accompanied by the slaughter of thousands of peasants, and the +expenditure of millions, and a war which had been<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_18">[18]</span> boasted of as one undertaken as +a “duty of honour.” Granville must have resigned if his Cabinet had +belied him. There was no “political” way out of it, except for the +Foreign Office to harden its heart and persevere in its +accomplished wrong. This, I say, was the tragedy of the situation, +and for this Egypt was sacrificed. As for Dufferin, he doubtless +argued, being an old diplomatist with a career to maintain, that he +had been sent to Egypt by the Foreign Office to get them out of an +all but impossible scrape, but that his instructions did not +include the duty of proving them fools. He therefore made his +settlement on the lines prescribed. It may be said of him with +truth that he missed, unwillingly, an heroic opportunity, and I +think also with truth that it left him with occasional qualms of +conscience which troubled him through the rest of his long and +eminently successful life.</p> + +<p>For these reasons nothing in the way of an efficient new policy +was insisted on by Dufferin, or adopted by the Government, and all +the rest of the programme so elaborately drawn up by him of +councils and assemblies, and dignified with the name of a +Constitution, was rendered impotent from the outset by being +entrusted to hands the least desirous of its success and the least +competent to deal with it.</p> + +<p>We, who were watching, were not long in being undeceived in our +hopes. The new year 1883 began badly. Although its actual first act +at Cairo was the issuing of the decree promised us by Dufferin of a +general amnesty for all connected with the “Rebellion,” and though +I had received from him a private letter announcing to me the good +news of the release of 450 political prisoners, for which I had +duly thanked him, it soon appeared that the operation of the decree +was being evaded in practice<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_19">[19]</span> where the Khedive needed to be indulged in +acts of unsatisfied vengeance on those who had specially offended +him. But for this, I had intended that with the issue of the +amnesty my political intervention in Egypt should end. I felt that +I had done my whole duty by salvaging, as far as I could, the wreck +of the National Party; I had so far succeeded in saving the lives, +if not the liberty, of all concerned, and it was my thought to +rely, as Gordon had advised me, on Gladstone for the rest, and to +turn my energies into other channels. A very few days, however, +passed before it became evident that things were going less fairly +in Egypt than they seemed. About the 15th of January Napier,<a id= +"FNanchor_6"></a><a href="#Footnote_6" class="fnanchor">[6]</a> +having finished his work at Cairo, returned to London, and from him +I learned that, notwithstanding the amnesty and the clearing of the +prisons announced by Dufferin, a certain number of the political +prisoners had been detained while others were being arrested and +put on trial before special courts on charges connected with the +past year. The charges brought were so-called “criminal charges” +against persons implicated in the riots at Alexandria, Tantah, and +other places, before or during the war, and on this pretence +vengeance was being taken on political enemies by the Khedive and +the Court Party. What made these prosecutions the more infamous was +the fact that innocent men were being indicted for the very crimes +their accusers had been themselves guilty of, and, to make the +injustice of it the more glaring, some of them were being tried +before military courts appointed by the very man, Omar Pasha Lutfi, +now Minister of War, who with the Khedive’s connivance and +suggestion had prepared the Alexandria<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_20">[20]</span> riot not a year before. It was a “judicial +atrocity” of the most shameless kind.</p> + +<p>I therefore wrote to Dufferin a letter, the full text of which +will be found in the <a href="#appc">Appendix</a> at the end of +this volume, complaining of the exceptions that had been made to +the amnesty. “It would seem,” I said, “most unfair that the leaders +of the ‘rebellion’ having foregone their right of being publicly +defended, any of their followers or associates should be punished +for rebellion. . . . I cannot understand how it can be the wish of +our Government to make scapegoats of the rank and file of those +charged with the criminal acts of June and July, while the chief +offenders enjoy immunity. If one thing has been proved to the +satisfaction of the Government more than another, it is that Omar +Lutfi was responsible for the murderous character of the riots of +the 11th of June, yet we read still of executions at Alexandria for +crimes committed on that day by others, the chief culprit himself +being the while at large, in honour, and even holding high office +under the Khedive. I say nothing of the Khedive himself, though you +doubtless know how little his conduct on that day would have borne +investigation.”</p> + +<p>Dufferin’s answer to this, while personally amiable, was the +reverse of satisfactory. It referred me to a report drawn up by Sir +Charles Wilson about the discharge of political prisoners, but +ignored the real point of my remonstrance, the breach of the +amnesty of which I had complained. The monstrosity of the +prosecutions’ being carried on in the Khedive’s name for acts due +to the Khedive’s own instigation was too delicate ground to be +ventured on, and Dufferin was diplomatically silent. In the +meanwhile men were being hanged, and among them, on the 5th of +February, a young officer charged with<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_21">[21]</span> being responsible for the riot at Tantah in +July 1882.</p> + +<p>The riots of Tantah, which took place a few days after the +bombardment of Alexandria, were the work of the Alexandrian mob +which had fled from that city. They were permitted and encouraged +by the then governor of the province, Ibrahim Pasha Adhem, an +adherent of the Khedive, who sought to emulate the conduct of Omar +Pasha Lutfi in the Alexandrian case. The Tantah massacre would have +attained very large proportions but for the intervention of Ahmed +Bey Minshawi, a neighbouring fellah proprietor of great local +authority, aided by Yusuf Abu Diab, one of Abd-el-Aal Pasha’s +aides-de-camp, who had been sent by Arabi to protect the +Christians. The governor, Ibrahim Adhem, had then been arrested by +Arabi’s order, and sent a prisoner to the citadel, but on the +return of the Khedive to Cairo had been reinstated in his office at +Tantah and had inverted the <em>rôle</em> of guilt in the affair. +Early in the year 1883 Abu Diab had been singled out and tried for +the other’s crime, and now while I was still in correspondence with +Dufferin hanged at Tantah. His execution, where the truth of the +affair was known to every one and where Abu Diab was highly +esteemed, struck terror through the whole province. I did not hear +of the case until too late to intervene; but when, a few days +later, Dufferin’s unsatisfactory answer came, I resolved not to +allow such another injustice to go by without public remonstrance. +It is impossible that Dufferin who, though he had refused to +examine into the history of the Alexandrian riot, knew in a general +way how the case really lay as between the Khedive and the +Nationalists, should not have suspected that this and other trials +on similar charges were a perversion of justice. Also<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_22">[22]</span> it is certain that there was a +strong political interest to serve, if the Khedive was to be +rehabilitated and supported, in providing him with a scapegoat for +his own and his agents crimes. Nor can it be left out of view that +the theory of the Nationalists’ responsibility for the riot had +been made the pretext and excuse throughout by our diplomacy, and +by Dufferin himself at the Constantinople Conference, for its +intervention. Dufferin was no sentimentalist in politics, and could +at times be hard. In this case, as in others which preceded and +followed it, he contented himself with directing the formal +presence of an Englishman at the trial, one unacquainted with the +language, to watch it, and thus allowed the Khedive to have +practically his own way.</p> + +<p>The next case that occurred was that of the vengeance taken on a +number of unfortunate Bedouins charged with the murder of Professor +Palmer during the war. Palmer (see “Secret History”) had been sent +by our Government, and especially by Lord Northbrook, to bribe the +Bedouin tribes east of the Suez Canal, and with him Gill and +Charrington, two English officers, had met their deaths in its +performance. They had all three, travelling disguised, been taken +prisoners and shot in the desert by order of the Egyptian governor +of Nakhl, an act not of common murder but clearly of warfare, and +one which should certainly have been covered by the amnesty, the +business the disguised officers were on giving them the character +of spies. But our Government had special reasons for resenting +their death; and after the war was over an English officer, Colonel +Warren, was despatched to the Sinai peninsula to “do justice” on +the tribes. This duty he performed by driving in to Suez some +scores of Bedouins, men, women, and children, and +selecting<span class="pagenum" id="Page_23">[23]</span> out of them +five for hanging, while the rest were retained for many months in +prison as hostages for more important persons still at large. This +was the same Warren who afterwards figured so lugubriously at Spion +Kop in the Boer war. The true facts of the case had been brought to +my knowledge by Palmer’s widow, who came to me incensed against the +Government, and holding them, and especially Lord Northbrook who +had sent him, responsible for her husband’s death. She now laid the +whole particulars before me; and we had questions put about it in +Parliament, and eventually a debate raised on the Address, and +another in the House of Lords, in which Her Majesty’s Ministers +rose, one after the other, and, like Ananias and Sapphira, lied +valiantly in the public cause. It is a curious feature of our +parliamentary conventions that so worthy and straightforward a man +as the late Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman should have consented on +this occasion to deny absolutely facts of which there was the +clearest possible written proof, and of which he could not have +been ignorant, in Palmer’s own handwriting, while also it concerned +a sum of public money no smaller than £20,000. Lord Northbrook was +the Minister really responsible and Bannerman was his +Under-Secretary at the Admiralty, and to him the work of denial was +given by his chief. We failed to save the Bedouins but obtained for +the lady a handsome pension, and for Palmer sepulture in St. +Paul’s. The whole story is instructive but has been told in my +“Secret History,” and its sequel does not sufficiently concern +Egyptian history to detain me here.</p> + +<p>A third still more important case among the political hangings +of the year was that of Suliman Bey Sami, the Nationalist Colonel +of the Alexandria<span class="pagenum" id="Page_24">[24]</span> +garrison, who, at the time of the riots, had come down with his +regiment and put an end to the massacre in spite of the conniving +civil Governor, Omar Pasha Lutfi. Omar Lutfi was a strong partisan +of the Khedive, and the resentment of the Court party was, for this +reason, especially keen against Sami. It was a case precisely on +the same lines as that of Abu Diab, except that the charge brought +against Sami was not in regard to his conduct at the time of the +riot, but for having set fire to Alexandria during the bombardment +a month later. It is especially disgraceful to our Government that +this man should have been hanged with their connivance, and by a +court-martial appointed by this very Omar Lutfi, because the charge +brought against him concerned one of their own political fictions, +namely, that Alexandria was set fire to not at all by the guns of +the British fleet, but solely by the Egyptians, a fiction in which +they had not only a political but also a pecuniary interest, +involving responsibility for the three millions sterling indemnity +claimed by the victims of the bombardment. The hanging, moreover, +was the clearest possible breach of the amnesty, for Suliman’s act +had the perfectly legitimate excuse of warfare, as one designed to +cover the retreat of the Egyptian army. Here the case was so strong +a one against the Government that I was able to secure the help of +that really efficient fighter in the House of Commons, Lord +Randolph Churchill, an occasion memorable to me as the beginning of +a valuable political friendship long preserved.</p> + +<p>Randolph Churchill was an extraordinarily interesting young man, +the most attractive at that time in English public life, the head +of the little group of four Tories in the House of Commons which +went<span class="pagenum" id="Page_25">[25]</span> by the name of +the Fourth Party. Until the spring of 1883 I had not come across +him personally. He had been kept away from the House during the +whole earlier session of 1882 by illness, and I had not had the +good fortune of securing his help. I have often thought that but +for the accident of his illness that spring, when the Egyptian +crisis occurred, the whole trouble and discredit of the bombardment +and the war might have been prevented, for it needed nothing but a +powerful and persistent voice on the Opposition side in Parliament +to deter Mr. Gladstone from an enterprise so strangely at variance +with his life-long teaching. Unfortunately, such a voice had not +been available. The members of Mr. Gladstone’s own party did not +dare, with the single exception of Sir Wilfrid Lawson, to reproach +him with the necessary courage, and as for the Tory Opposition, not +one of them had the wisdom to take with him a humanitarian line, +the only one which could have convinced him of his folly.</p> + +<p>In the short autumn session, Churchill had reappeared and had +given courage to his followers, and they had helped us in getting a +fair trial for the vanquished “rebels,” Churchill himself +generously subscribing to the Arabi defence fund. But so far we had +not personally met. Now, however, in my anger at the barbarities +which were being committed in Egypt, and by the advice of my +friends, especially Lady Gregory and my cousin, Algernon Bourke, +who was still on the staff of the “Times” (see “Secret History”) I +turned to Churchill as the one man capable of dealing in Parliament +effectively with the case. Dufferin, his mission ended, had turned +his back on Egypt, and the small local protection given by his +presence was no more to be had. It was an urgent necessity, if +these black doings were to be stopped,<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_26">[26]</span> that the home Government should be at once +subjected to vigorous and even violent remonstrance, and that +Gladstone should be attacked individually as the responsible author +of the atrocities due to his intervention. In his younger days +Gladstone had denounced the State crimes of Bourbon rule in Naples +with its arrests, imprisonments, and sanguinary political +punishments, and it was urgent now that some one should stand up in +the House and remind him of his more reputable past, and shame him +from the countenance his agents were giving to the same State +crimes in Egypt. Churchill in his place below the gangway was the +man for this. He was “spoiling,” I was told, “for a fight,” and to +him in my new need I turned as the one knight errant on whom I +could quite rely.</p> + +<p>I like to remember Lord Randolph as I then first saw him one +afternoon in May when, by appointment, I met him to discuss the +situation at some rooms in the Strand where a chess tournament was +going on. Chess was one of his few hobbies, and he had asked me to +meet him there. At the time of which I speak he was, with no very +regular features, a distinctly good-looking young man, smartly +dressed and with a certain distinction of manner which marked him +from the common herd. He was of ordinary height—by no means the +dwarf his caricatures suggest—well built and well set up, his face +a pleasant one, eyes full of intelligence, though rather <em>à +fleur de tête</em>, while his mouth, overhung with a strong +moustache curling up above his cheeks, gave an aggressive tone to +his countenance it would not otherwise have had. In colour he was +then, as always, rather pale, with a look of ill-health which later +increased from year to year, a symptom of the constitutional +weakness of which he so prematurely<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_27">[27]</span> died. There was no lack, however, as yet of +virility in his movements or gestures. On the contrary, it was just +the vital force in him which was the chief attraction and the frank +irresponsibility in all he did and said. Indeed, it was difficult +when conversing with him, even after he had become a Cabinet +Minister, to regard him as a quite serious statesman—a glorified +schoolboy rather, ready still to rob an orchard or tie a cracker to +the head master’s coattail. This simplicity of speech and pleasant +humour, joined to a high-bred courtesy with strangers, made him a +favourite, especially with young men nor only of his own class in +England, while, as I afterwards found, it opened to him no less the +doors of confidence in the minds of the many Orientals whom I +brought to see him—minds usually suspicious of Englishmen, and slow +to reveal their thoughts. He had none of that arrogant coldness +that so much repels these, nor again of that abruptness of address +which is apt to frighten them, as birds are frightened at any too +sudden movement. Such visitors never failed after an interview with +Churchill to speak to me enthusiastically in his praise. To myself +he was invariably charming. My somewhat romantic view of politics, +so little like his own, attracted him, and my knowledge of the +East, of which he was as yet ignorant; and, being some ten years +his senior in age, I was able to inspire him almost from the +beginning of our intercourse with new ideas, enlarging his +political horizon, and as I have always been glad to think, +encouraging him in the humaner paths of public virtue. To these he +was already in a vague way inclined, and on the occasion of our +first meeting I had no difficulty in persuading him to take up the +Egyptian patriotic case, the more so because it gave him an +opportunity for immediate action in<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_28">[28]</span> Parliament most damaging to the Government. +He found it a pleasant fancy, when I suggested it to him, that he +should array himself in the Grand Old Man’s Midlothian garments, +left as it were outside a tavern door, and preach to him to his +face of “righteousness and temperance and a judgement to come.”</p> + +<p>With Churchill’s assistance I was able to enlist other strong +helpers, Drummond Wolff, who was the member of the Fourth Party +specially affected to foreign affairs, and Gorst (Sir John) its +legal adviser—both men of great ability and political courage. +Outside their radius, too, I had for friends in the House of +Commons Robert Bourke,<a id="FNanchor_7"></a><a href="#Footnote_7" +class="fnanchor">[7]</a> who represented foreign affairs on the +Opposition front bench; Sir Wilfrid Lawson, the most honest man in +Parliament; and Labouchere, whom I had known in my old diplomatic +days as a fellow attaché, and who was now leader of the extreme +Radical division below the gangway. All these were good men and +true in a parliamentary fight, and, working together, could be +counted on to force the official entrenchments of the Government, +and make the Grand Old Man the object of daily attacks which should +convince him of his shame. We had good help, too, from the Irish +party, and it had been O’Donnell who had opened the campaign for us +with the Palmer case.</p> + +<p>Thanks especially to Churchill’s energy that summer, and to the +great publicity he was able to give to the Khedive’s connection +with the riots, I have the satisfaction of remembering that we +succeeded at last in putting a stop to the worst barbarities of the +restored regime at Cairo, nor was any further political<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_29">[29]</span> hanging after that summer +permitted as long as Gladstone remained in office. The experience +of the past year, however, left me wholly sceptical of the good +faith of either our Cairo diplomacy or the London Foreign Office, +and permanently estranged me from that vast official machinery of +the British Empire which, I now came to see, maintained its power +in the East only by a system of mingled lying, force, and fraud +repellent to common honesty and equally demoralizing to the +governors and those it governed. It was in this mood that +Dufferin’s famous “Charter” of Egypt’s liberty found me when at +last I read it in the pages of a new Blue Book.</p> + +<p>I reproduce from among my papers the following interesting +letter from Lady Gregory<a id="FNanchor_8"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_8" class="fnanchor">[8]</a> which admirably describes +our common feeling about the charter at the time we read it. It was +written just when I was seeking to bring forward the charges +against the Khedive, and when Dufferin, having returned to England, +was using his influence with the press to get the charge hushed up. +It is too good and instructive a letter not to be printed here in +full.</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">(Undated but written at the beginning of May +1883.)</p> +</div> + +<p>“I am curious to hear what you think of Lord Dufferin’s +despatch. It reminds me of what someone of the ancients said of +human life, ‘a comedy to those who think, a tragedy to those who +feel.’</p> + +<p>“I am very sorry I did not know you had not seen Lord Dufferin’s +despatch. I read it, and sent it off yesterday to Sir William, but +would have sent it to you first if I had known. It would not, +however, do much to put you in good spirits. There are some good +suggestions in it, taken from Arabi’s programme, such as a National +Bank to come between<span class="pagenum" id="Page_30">[30]</span> +the people and the usurers, and a reform in the working of the +Cadastre. But for all evils his remedy is: Put in more Europeans. +Of course when the country is well stocked with English surveyors +and judges and engineers it will be necessary to keep English +troops there to protect them. I would rather they annexed at once. +There would be less hypocrisy about it. He winds up with a +panegyric on Nubar, Sherif and Riaz and alludes in terms of +admiration to Sultan Pasha and calls the Khedive amiable and +benevolent. So you may imagine the style of the document, in which +there are poetic allusions to Memnon and Pactolus and a great +flourish about putting the house-tax on Europeans, and this +ridiculous Parliament which is to have no hold on the purse strings +and will be of course useless, but sounds well. I don’t blame Lord +Dufferin so much. Of course the Government told him what was +expected of him, but he might just as well have drawn up this prose +poem at Therapia without going to Egypt at all.</p> + +<p>“I enclose copy of your statement which I am keeping for the +present. I have seen Chenery<a id="FNanchor_9"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_9" class="fnanchor">[9]</a> to-day and talked the matter +over with him, but Lord Dufferin has been beforehand with me! +having already interviewed him and, as if he knew what was coming, +persuaded him that any attack on the Khedive would add immense +difficulty to the action of the Government just now—that, whatever +his faults may be, he has promised to support English policy, and +that for the interests of the Empire it is much better to let +bygones be bygones—and that the ‘Times’ is such a very important +paper that anything that appeared in it against Tewfik would at +once be made use of by the French, and within<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_31">[31]</span> two hours be telegraphed to the Khedive, +who would believe the Government and the ‘Times’ were the same +thing—that this is a time of change in Egypt, a new man being sent +there and a new start made and the less stir made about what had +already occurred there the better. This is also Lord Granville’s +view!</p> + +<p>“Poor Chenery had then to listen to my appeal as to whether +Arabi’s character was never to be cleared from the slurs cast upon +it by Gladstone and Dilke in the House, and never withdrawn, just +to save the Khedive whom no one has any opinion of, and he became +agitated after reading your statement and said that if it were true +the Khedive ought to be hanged—but that at the same time, for the +reasons given before, he is very doubtful whether he ought to +publish it, even in a letter from you. In the end he said that, if +you would modify as far as possible the <em>personal</em> attack on +the Khedive and add a paragraph laying the crime more on the Palace +party than on him and make it as much as possible a defence of +Arabi rather than an indictment of Tewfik, he would see if he could +publish it, though not binding himself by a promise, and if he +could not would return it to you in time to publish it elsewhere, +as I told him it must be out by the 11th. He was very kind and I +think was really anxious to be amiable, and spoke most +affectionately of you, and I really don’t blame him for not wishing +to quarrel with the Government. Indeed I was hopeless from the time +I heard Lord Dufferin had taken him in hand. What are we against +him?</p> + +<div class="linegrp-container"> +<div class="linegrp"> +<div class="group"> +<div class="line indent0">Don’t seek to hinder him</div> + +<div class="line indent0">Or to bewilder him</div> + +<div class="line indent0">Sure he’s a pilgrim</div> + +<div class="line indent4">From the Blarney stone!</div> +</div> +</div> +</div> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_32">[32]</span>“I told Sir +William all this and he is pretty sure Chenery will be afraid to +print it in any form, and I should be very unwilling to take away +any of the force of the accusation against Tewfik. I thought all +the more of its importance from Chenery being so afraid of the +effect it might have. Sir William and I both think that if you +could get Lord Randolph to make the statement in the House it would +be your best course, as it would thus gain publicity, and the +Tories at all events might take it up. Do you think this will be +possible? I should not like you to publish it in any paper but the +‘Times.’ Chenery talked cheerfully of a ‘little pamphlet,’ but that +was of course to prevent the little foundling being laid on his own +doorstep.”</p> +</div> + +<p>My own impression of Dufferin’s charter, and his famous dispatch +expounding it, was little different from that here quoted. It was +obvious to all of us who knew anything of Egypt that in the present +condition of things there, under the restored regime of Tewfik and +the Turco-Circassian Pashas maintained in power by a British army +and allowed to imprison and hang whom they would, where there was +neither freedom of speech nor of the press, and where all political +society was honeycombed with spies, the talk of giving back liberty +to the Egyptians was in the nature of a sorry jest. The Queen’s +speech which had ushered it in on the opening of Parliament had +been a mere repetition of all the old Foreign Office platitudes of +the previous years. Her Majesty had been made by Gladstone’s +Cabinet to say: “The reconstitution of Egypt and the reorganization +of its affairs under the authority of the Khedive have in part been +accomplished, and will continue to receive my earnest attention. It +will be my endeavour<span class="pagenum" id="Page_33">[33]</span> +to secure that full provision shall be made for the exigencies of +order, for a just representation of the wants and wishes of the +population, and for the observance of international obligations,” a +programme more meagre than that of the previous year, in which “the +prudent development of Egyptian institutions” had been promised, +with the result of Egypt’s parliament having been crushed and +abolished six months later by a British army. What was it possible +to hope from the liberalism of a government which had restored the +absolute power of a Prince so detested by his subjects that it +needed British bayonets to keep him on his throne? Dufferin’s +charter, to be made a reality, called for a change of Khedive as a +first condition of its success, and of this no sign whatever had +been given. To talk of granting a Constitution, as a novelty, to a +people who had just been robbed of their Constitution, and whose +constitutional leaders had been ruined and driven into exile, could +be only a mockery; and as such it appeared to us. Dufferin had +indeed been a “pilgrim from the Blarney stone.”</p> + +<div class="quote"> +<p class="hang1 sc space-below15">Memorandum of Reforms for Egypt +drawn up at Lord Dufferin’s request by Ahmed Arabi Pasha, December +1882 (exact date not given)</p> + +<p>1. The Constitution granted to the Egyptian Nation of 7th +February 1882 should be confirmed.</p> + +<p>2. Rules should be laid down as to the limiting of the power of +whoever may be appointed Ruler of Egypt, so that he shall no longer +be an absolute Ruler.</p> + +<p>3. Rules should also be laid down as to the Ministers and Heads +of Departments, so that each should have conditions imposed on him +which he could not transgress.</p> + +<p>4. A Mejlis or Council of Elders should be formed as a Body of +Appeal on important questions where differences shall +have<span class="pagenum" id="Page_34">[34]</span> occurred between +the Government and the Chamber of Representatives.</p> + +<p>5. New regulations should be issued for the reorganization of +the various administrative departments, so that each Department or +Province or Office should have so many officials of assigned rank +belonging to it, at fixed salaries liable neither to increase nor +to decrease, with regulations as to promotion according as +vacancies occur through resignation or death or for any other +natural reason.</p> + +<p><em>Remark.</em>—Public offices in Egypt have hitherto been +conducted on no fixed rule, but every Minister or Governor or Chief +of Police has done with his administration as he pleased, +dismissing or promoting all under him without inquiry, and removing +officials from post to post according to his fancy, so that the +budget has always exceeded what was right, and increased from year +to year without sufficient reason; this it is which has caused +yearly deficits in the budget.</p> + +<p>6. Rules should be made to control the action of the police so +that they should cease to interfere with the judicial inquiry into +cases, as now is done, but each police station should have a small +Council to deal with cases in its own district and refer them to +the tribunals of First Instance for decision. The police should +appear in the character of prosecutors only.</p> + +<p>7. Municipalities should be formed in Cairo, Alexandria, and +other considerable Egyptian towns, as may be suited to each town, +and the funds raised by dues in each town should be kept in the +treasury of each Administration to be spent on improvements for +that town only, such as mending roads, repairing public buildings, +lighting the town with gas, supplying water, erecting +slaughter-houses, hospitals, and public markets for the sale of +whatever produce is brought in from the country, and on whatever +else may be of advantage to the town or prevent its injury.</p> + +<p>8. Rules shall be laid down to control the transactions of the +small and the large banks, and to fix the maximum rate of interest +all over Egypt.</p> + +<p><em>Remark.</em>—The banks themselves are at present the cause +of the ruin and destruction and misery which have fallen upon the +indigent fellah.</p> + +<p>9. Tribunals shall be instituted all over Egypt with the +formation of the High Courts, one of them at Cairo, the other at +Alexandria, the members of both of which shall be chosen from among +the Native and Foreign Notables; and it shall be their function to +pronounce final decisions. Rules shall be laid down for the +guidance of these Courts suitable to the country.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_35">[35]</span>10. The Consular +jurisdictions shall be abolished, and all suits concerning +foreigners inhabiting Egypt shall be tried before the +abovementioned tribunals.</p> + +<p>11. All foreigners inhabiting Egypt shall be on an equal footing +with the natives in paying taxes and customs duties, and all such +imposts as are incumbent on the natives.</p> + +<p>12. The Mixed Tribunals shall be abolished, the Courts +abovementioned being sufficient.</p> + +<p>13. The official language in all parts of the country shall be +Arabic.</p> + +<p>14. Egypt shall remain dependent on the Ottoman Porte as she is +now, inasmuch as we know that the hearts of the Egyptians are in +sympathy with the Porte. But inasmuch as the shoulders of Egypt are +burdened with debts, and as the situation demands such a diminution +of the debt, as will be mentioned below, so also it becomes +necessary to diminish and limit the yearly tribute paid to the +Porte to the amount imposed upon Egypt in the time of Mohammed Ali +Pasha, considering, too, that at that time Egypt had no debt.</p> + +<p>15. The Suez Canal shall be under the protection of the European +powers generally and jointly.</p> + +<p>16. Slavery shall be abolished absolutely and permanently.</p> + +<p>17. The Sudan ought to remain a dependency of Egypt, and that +because it has a fertile climate; and, if a railway were made to +Khartoum, it would become the great centre of commerce for the +Sudan and the East, and it would begin to be gradually +civilized.</p> + +<p>18. A rule should be made determining the conditions according +to which everyone, whether native or foreign, is employed in the +Egyptian public administration, and the term of his service and +retirement and promotion and dismissal shall be fixed.</p> + +<p>19. The assessment of taxes in general must be reformed, and the +customs duties, because they are based at present on inequitable +principles.</p> + +<p>20. All these administrations, of which the revenues are +mortgaged for the Egyptian debt, such as railways, ports, +Governorships, the Municipality in Cairo, and the Administrations +of the Domains and the Daira Sanieh, shall revert to the +Government, in order that they (the Government) may administer +these revenues as they think best, and may refund the surplus to +the Treasury of the Malieh, inasmuch as the continuance of those +administrations under present conditions is a yearly loss to the +Egyptian Treasury.</p> + +<p>21. The Caisse de la Dette shall be abolished, the Treasury of +the Malieh being sufficient.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_36">[36]</span>22. The Egyptian +Debt must be unified and diminished to 50 millions sterling, at an +interest of 3 per cent. yearly, so that the Egyptian Government +shall be itself a guarantee for the payment of the instalments when +due, and those instalments shall be paid at the dates fixed, and +those dates shall be fixed at the end of the harvest, winter and +summer.</p> + +<p>23. A commission shall be formed of eminent engineers and men of +science and art to repair ancient Arab buildings which have begun +to decay, and to restore them to their original condition, taking +care to preserve the hieroglyphics and temples and monuments of +ancient Egypt, and to examine them and put them in order, and to +build a large museum to receive the Egyptian and Arab +antiquities.</p> + +<p>24. The native schools in the towns and villages shall be put in +order and made accessible for the education of children of both +sexes and the spread of knowledge and civilization.</p> + +<p>25. A real Budget shall be drawn up each year with great +accuracy, so that the Government may know its exact revenue, as +also its expenses. These should be reckoned each year, after the +necessary reforms shall have been decided on. Three months before +the end of each financial year there shall be an inspection of the +surplus cash in the Treasury of the Malieh remaining after payment +of all expenses; and this sum shall be divided into two portions, +according to circumstances—one of them to be applied to paying off +a part of the original capital of the Debt, and the other to +reclaiming lands suitable for cultivation.</p> + +<p>26. The question of appointing a new Ruler (Waly) is an +important one, and I will lay before you my own views and those of +my comrades. I say: That the family of Ibrahim Pasha, son of +Mohammed Ali, is absolutely worthless for the sovereignty, no +matter how they might be controlled by a constitution, for they are +people of notoriously corrupt principles.</p> + +<p>In my opinion there is a choice of two courses:</p> + +<p>1. To appoint Halim Pasha, son of Mohammed Ali Pasha, as Waly +for Egypt under the conditions above laid down. He is a man who has +been tried by misfortunes, and has tasted the bitterness of +injustice, and has reached the age of about 55 years, and I believe +that such a man may try to win the sympathy of the people by +justice and kindness.</p> + +<p>2. The other to appoint as Waly for Egypt one of her own men of +the national party, whose deeds have borne witness to their +goodness of disposition and peaceful character. But as to any idea +of appointing a foreign Ruler, I say that, as the mass of the +Egyptians are Moslems, with the exception of the small section of +Copts, and these also are the same as the Egyptians in<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_37">[37]</span> their dealings and ways of life, +I believe that the appointment of a foreign Waly would not suit the +character of the Egyptians, but that it would perhaps cause trouble +among them. As to the regard to be had for the interests of +foreigners, I say that when equitable tribunals shall have been +formed, with the High Courts previously mentioned, those Courts +will themselves guarantee the interests of natives and foreigners +together, for it has hitherto been unheard of that any Egyptian +should wrong a foreigner.</p> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_38">[38]</span><a id= +"c02"></a>CHAPTER II</h2> + +<p class="sch1">SIR EVELYN BARING ARRIVES AT CAIRO</p> + +<p class="dcap">THE events briefly narrated in the last chapter +will explain the bitterness of heart with which in the late summer +of 1883 I once more prepared to leave England for Egypt on my road +to India. What little belief I may have retained in the honour or +indeed the common honesty of Mr. Gladstone’s Government in its +relations with the unfortunate people, which it had first passed +under the harrow of its arms and then mocked with the jibes of its +diplomacy, had given place in me to a resentment which seemed to +impose it as a duty henceforth of my life to take sides with the +poor Nile dwellers against their European betrayers, and to do my +utmost to counterwork the financial and Foreign Office rogues in +their design of perpetuating their subjection.</p> + +<p>In Egypt itself there seemed little for the present to +accomplish. With Churchill’s help I had succeeded in putting a stop +to the worst excesses of the restored regime. Malet and Colvin were +both being removed to less dangerous spheres of official activity, +and the appointment of Major Baring in their place at Cairo seemed +a guarantee against any violent renewal. Baring, who was afterwards +to be Lord Cromer, had a reputation at that time for +large-mindedness which imposed upon the public, in spite of his +financial connections, and caused it to be believed that he would +do his best to hasten, not delay, the evacuation of Cairo. He was +supposed to represent Mr. Gladstone’s policy of a reconstruction of +the Khedivial autonomy on a basis of free institutions as declared +in his famous speech of 9th August,<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_39">[39]</span> when he promised that “having given Egypt a +fair start England would wish her God speed.” It is worth recalling +this, and also John Morley’s testimonial to Major Baring’s sound +Liberal ideas, published at the time of his appointment in the +“Pall Mall Gazette,” if only for the contrast of his prediction +with the notorious sequel of Lord Cromer’s career. This is how +Morley announced the event:</p> + +<p class="space-above15">“Major Evelyn Baring is now +semi-officially announced to have been appointed Consul-General in +Egypt in place of Sir Edward Malet. The selection is a good one. +Major Baring is something more than an eminent Anglo-Indian; he is +an experienced Anglo-Egyptian, familiar both with men and affairs +in the Nile Valley. His appointment will help to reassure the +public both at home and abroad as to the tendency of English policy +in Egypt, for it is well understood both at Cairo and in London +that Major Baring is not an advocate of a forward policy, and that +he is free from any delusions as to the possibility of inaugurating +a millennium in Egypt by placing it under ‘the masterful hand of a +British Resident.’ It is not in that direction that Major Baring +will lead the country in which he will be the accredited +representative of England.”</p> + +<p class="space-above15">I had disburdened my mind to a certain +extent of its anger by writing my diatribe in verse (see “Secret +History”) “The Wind and the Whirlwind,” but I felt that a more +active campaign was required of me, and Egypt being, as it seemed +for the present, closed to me, I had made up my mind before +publishing what I still had in view, a true history of the Egyptian +revolution and the intrigues which had<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_40">[40]</span> ruined it, to pay a visit to Arabi and his +fellow exiles in Ceylon, and from there to go on northwards and +make good my knowledge of the Islamic situation by visiting +Mohammedan India. In this last design I had been encouraged by that +early apostle of Mohammedan reform, Seyd Jemal-ed-Din Afghani, a +sketch of whose biography has been given elsewhere, and whose +acquaintance I had made that spring in London. Since the time of +his having been expelled from Egypt in 1879 by the Anglo-French +control, Jemal-ed-Din had wandered through many lands both east and +west, in India first, whence he had been driven by the persecution +of the political police; and then in the United States, where he +had endeavoured to qualify by residence as an American citizen; and +then, after passing through London, lastly at Paris, where he had +gathered around him a group of Nationalist exiles banished from +Egypt after Tel-el-Kebir. I had talked my intended visit to India +over with him, and he had thought it might be of use; and it had +been fixed that I was to leave England at the beginning of +September for the East, when the incident occurred to which +allusion has been made in my “India under Ripon,” and which sent me +once more to Egypt. As it relates to a point which has been +challenged by Lord Cromer in his “Modern Egypt,” I will give some +further account of it here, and it will serve as yet another proof +of the half intention there was still in Downing Street to recall +Arabi.</p> + +<p>A few days before the date fixed for my departure an unexpected +message reached me from Mr. Knowles, the editor of the “Nineteenth +Century Review,” who, an old friend of Gladstone’s, had once before +been used by the Prime Minister to convey a message to me, and whom +I knew to be interested in Arabi’s case,<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_41">[41]</span> begging me to call on him before starting on +my journey; and I consequently went to breakfast with him at his +house at Clapham on the morning of the 29th August. Knowles then +informed me that he had recently seen the Prime Minister, and that +it was in Gladstone’s mind, notwithstanding all that had occurred +during the past year, to recall Arabi to Egypt, and that he only +needed an excuse of some public kind to do so. His idea was that +according to the new Constitution decreed in harmony with Lord +Dufferin’s despatch, Arabi might be elected to one of the two +consultative bodies which were to form the basis of Egyptian +self-government. Elections to the General Assembly were about to be +held, and, if it could be arranged that Arabi should be returned as +a member of it, it would serve as a reason for urging his pardon on +the Egyptian Government, and his recall from exile. It was thought, +too, that during my passage through Egypt I might usefully suggest +such a course to my friends there and so arrange the matter. This +plan, with its parliamentary device so characteristic of +Gladstone’s mind, was one which I could not refuse to fall in +with—though I knew how difficult it would be to carry out. It +would, of course, be impossible to do anything at all without our +Government’s help at Cairo. Knowles, however, told me that Malet, +already for some time appointed to Brussels, was to leave for his +new post in a few days, and that Baring, who was to succeed him at +the Agency, was expected to inaugurate the new regime in full +accordance with Liberal principles. Colvin, too, was on the point +of leaving Egypt to resume his place in India as before in the +Civil Service. The field was therefore open, and anything might be +expected. I have a record of this conversation in letters which I +wrote at the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_42">[42]</span> time to +Mrs. Howard, whose guest at Nawarth I had recently been, and to +Lady Gregory. These say:</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">“<em>30th August</em>, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p>“At James Street I found many important letters, among others a +note from Knowles, asking me to breakfast at Clapham; there he gave +me the news. He had seen Mr. Gladstone lately, and is assured he +will both stay in office, and, if he can find some way for his +pride, restore the National Party in Egypt. It appears they are +quite aware the present state of things cannot be made to go on, +and Sir Evelyn Baring has been appointed with <em>carte +blanche</em> to devise a new policy in place of Malet’s and +Dufferin’s, which have proved failures. Baring has written an +article for the ‘Nineteenth Century’ on Lord Ripon’s policy in +India, full of the most Liberal ideas, which will come out in +October, and Knowles thinks he will receive me with open arms. So +he advises me to be there soon after he arrives, and thinks the +Government will be delighted if we can get Arabi returned for +Cairo, and other Nationalists for other places.”</p> +</div> + +<p>Lord Cromer’s article here referred to, and which will be found +in the October number of the “Nineteenth Century Review” of 1883, +though not a very striking one, is of importance in connection with +the view taken of it at the time in the minds of those who +appointed him and with his later views. It is a somewhat feeble +plea for local self-government in India and a free press. He +declares himself to be on the side of those “who have established a +free press, who have promoted education, who have admitted natives +more and more largely to the public services in various forms, and +who have favoured the extension<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_43">[43]</span> of Local Self-Government.” The most forcible +passage in the article says: “No one who watches the signs of the +times in India with even moderate care can doubt that we have +entered upon a period of change. The spread of education, the +increasing influence of a free press, the substituting of legal for +discretionary administration, the progress of railways and +telegraphs, the easier communication with Europe, and the more +ready influx of European ideas, are beginning to produce a marked +effect upon the people. New ideas are springing up. New aspirations +are being called forth. The power of public opinion is growing +daily. Such a condition of affairs is one in which the task of +Government, and especially of a despotic Government, is beset with +difficulties of no light kind. To move too fast is dangerous, but +to lag behind is more dangerous still. The problem is how to deal +with this new born spirit of progress, raw and superficial as in +many respects it is, so as to direct it into a right course, and to +derive from it all the benefits which its development is capable of +ultimately conferring upon the country, and at the same time to +prevent it from becoming, through blind indifference or stupid +repression, a source of serious political danger. It is only what +ought to be expected by every thoughtful man, that after fifty +years of a free press, and thirty years of expanding education, +with European ideas flowing into the country on every side, and old +indigenous customs, habits and prejudices breaking down, changes +should be taking place in the thoughts, the desires and the aims of +the intelligent and educated men of the country, which no wise and +cautious Government can afford to disregard, and to which they must +gradually adapt their system of administration, if they do not wish +to see it shattered by<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_44">[44]</span> forces which they have themselves called into +being, but which they have failed to guide and control.”</p> + +<p>Again, in a second letter a week later, I wrote:</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">“<em>8th Sept.</em>, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p>“We have taken our places for Suez by the French steamer which +leaves Marseilles on the 16th, and so hope to arrive at Cairo about +the 25th. By that time Malet and Colvin will have gone their ways, +let us hope for <em>ever</em>, and if there is anything in +Knowles’s argument I shall find the field open for me with Baring. +At the same time I confess I am far from sanguine. In the first +place I do not trust Mr. Gladstone as you do, and then I +<em>know</em> the difficulties; these will be immense, and without +really cordial co-operation from Baring I could do nothing at all +that would be any good. I rather suspect, too, that the Foreign +Office may be trying to make use of me by encouraging just so much +opposition to the elections as to make them appear spontaneous. But +we shall see; half an hour’s talk with Baring will probably be +enough to show me whether it is worth my while staying in Egypt or +whether I should not rather go on to India. . . . I had a very +interesting talk with an Oriental yesterday who tells me . . . that +there are still strong influences about the Sultan in favour of +Arab independence in Egypt, and that, if the English Government +chooses, the party can be restored, but it all depends upon the +action of our Government.”</p> +</div> + +<p>Parliament at the date of this letter had not long been +prorogued, and all the world was out of town. Gladstone, among the +rest, was away; he had gone yachting with Sir Donald Currie, his +host on the occasion, Sir Algernon West, and a party of his +other<span class="pagenum" id="Page_45">[45]</span> friends, and +was actually, I believe, on the coast of Norway, and I could not +wait for his return, my own departure from England being fixed for +the 12th of September. Nevertheless, while I was considering the +matter I received a note from Sir Edward Hamilton, Gladstone’s +private secretary, asking to see me before I went, and the morning +before I was to start I heard again from him that he wished to see +me. I went therefore to him the same morning to Downing Street, and +talked the matter of the restoration of the National Party over +with him, as described in “India under Ripon,” and it was agreed +between us that I was to call on Baring while passing through +Cairo, and that if Baring would help I would try to get the +Nationalist leaders elected at the elections; but all depended on +the co-operation of our officials. He asked me whether I was going +to take anybody with me to Egypt, and I said I had been thinking of +taking Sabunji, my Oriental secretary,<a id= +"FNanchor_10"></a><a href="#Footnote_10" class="fnanchor">[10]</a> +but that as he was looked upon with so much suspicion by the +Foreign Office I had resolved not to do so. Later, however, I found +it necessary to take him, and I let Hamilton know my change of +plan. The next day I started with my wife for Paris, where, as I +have explained in my other volume, I saw Sheykh Jemal-ed-Din, and +arranged with him the details of my Indian journey.</p> + +<p>It was on this occasion that I first made acquaintance with +James Sanua, better known as Sheykh Abu Naddara, who was living in +a little lodging in the Avenue de Clichy, where he edited his paper +and gained a precarious livelihood as a master of languages. About +this very worthy Egyptian patriot, who has resided now in Paris for +upwards of thirty years and has gained a considerable position in +the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_46">[46]</span> French +journalistic world, I will here say a few words. James Sanua was +one of the earliest sufferers for liberty on the Nile. An Egyptian +Jew by birth, and a man of considerable wit and education, he had +become acquainted with Sheykh Jemal-ed-Din, Sheykh Mohammed Abdu, +and others of the Mohammedan reformers, who with their wide ideas +of religious tolerance received him into their circle in the Azhar, +and put him in the way of literary work. They then, seeing that he +had a pleasant wit, encouraged him in a plan he had of starting a +puppet show, which, under the guise of amusement, was to spread +political ideas among the lower class. This had an immediate +success, the butt of Sanua’s wit being, under various disguises, +always the Khedive Ismaïl. The Polichinelle of the puppet show was +a personage in spectacles, called <em>Abu Naddara</em>, Father of +Glasses, from whom Sanua took his adopted name—he was himself half +blind with a neglected ophthalmia. From this commencement he went +on to publishing a small newspaper, at first in manuscript, and +then lithographed, which was distributed by hand at Cairo and +Alexandria. In it the same tone of nonsense was kept up, and with +good political effect, among the people of the streets. It was +continued for two or three years; Ismaïl himself, who came to hear +of it, joining, it is said, in the laughter, until at last it +overstepped the bounds of what his despotism considered allowable, +when it was suppressed and its author summarily exiled. Sanua, +however, was not to be beaten so easily, and with the help of his +friends found a refuge in Paris, and there continued to print his +“Abu Naddara” as a monthly sheet, and to get it distributed as +regularly as before in Egypt. At one time it had considerable +political importance, and was of sufficient<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_47">[47]</span> interest to induce the British Museum to +desire a complete series of its numbers, which I helped them to +obtain. (See also <a href="#appe">Appendix E.</a>)</p> + +<p class="space-above15">About the actual condition of things in +Egypt Sanua told me there were two parties, the clerical, which +looked to Constantinople for help, and the lay, which was powerless +because it had no leader. He and Jemal-ed-Din were at that time on +intimate terms with each other, and we spent most of our time with +them during the few days we were at Paris. On the 17th we left for +Marseilles; and from this point I am able to take up my narrative +by transcription from my journal.</p> + +<p>“<em>16th Sept.</em>—On board the Pei Ho. Sat at dinner next a +well-known Syrian merchant of Alexandria, Naghib Zogheb, and +learned his views, which, no doubt, represent those of the +commercial class generally. He is all for continued occupation, +annexation, or anything else that shall secure commercial +stability. He looks upon the English policy as ‘<em>très fin</em>. +It says little, and does a great deal.’ All posts are being filled +up with Englishmen. The low class Europeans do not like this, as it +takes the bread out of their mouths, but he and all respectable men +are pleased. He believes Egypt to be perfectly solvent, but the +English have been persuading the fellahin not to pay their debts to +the usurers. Zogheb is too great a man to be a usurer with the +fellahin himself, so as to assist the collection of the revenue, +and thinks the English will end by being not unpopular except with +the ‘fanatics.’ The Khedive and his Ministers are only dummies. +Tewfik is <em>un homme nul</em>, disliked by the +<em>indigènes</em>, and despised by the Europeans.</p> + +<p>“<em>17th Sept.</em>—My Syrian neighbour is +amusingly<span class="pagenum" id="Page_48">[48]</span> naïve. It +appears that he does lend money, but only in hundreds and +thousands; indeed Sabunji tells me he is the greatest of all the +Alexandrian usurers, and at dinner to-day he detailed to me some of +his transactions. ‘To get money from the Arabs,’ he says, ‘<em>il +faut de la ruse</em>. They owe you £100; they have not the money; +you take produce from them worth £200, or you lend them another +£100 on the value of £200. Yet there are some of them who, when +brought before the Court, are so shameless as to deny their +signatures.’ I asked him at how much he reckoned the private debts +of the fellahin, and he told me to guess. I said, ‘Our Government +pretends they owe ten millions.’ He said, ‘Say twelve or fifteen, +but their creditors would be content with eight millions, if it was +secured or paid off and they could leave the country. The whole +thing could be well settled for ten millions.’ ‘There is no +difficulty,’ he added, ‘in Egypt except what is to be done with the +<em>indigènes</em>. All the rest is simple. Egypt should be +colonized by Europeans, by Englishmen, and made to pay all her +debts.’ But the soil was getting worked out by overcropping, losing +about 15 per cent. yearly, set off by about 15 per cent. more land +being cultivated. He was again eulogistic of English cunning in +getting hold of Egypt. ‘They spent a deal of money in buying the +Bedouins, but it was money well spent. At Port Said they had had +the face to say when they disembarked that they came as friends to +help the Khedive; but all is fair when one’s own interest is +concerned.’ For himself he was glad they came and hoped they would +remain.</p> + +<p>“<em>18th Sept.</em>—I have a new neighbour at table, another +moneylender, a Greek of Cairo. His views are not very different +from the other’s, and he thinks<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_49">[49]</span> that the English Government is really serious +about withdrawing the troops.” [<em>N.B.</em>—It was intended at +the time to withdraw the Cairo garrison at the end of the year, +leaving only 3,000 men at Alexandria as an “army of observation.”] +“‘The misfortune is,’ he says, ‘that Mr. Gladstone is too loyal. He +promised not to annex, and he thinks it necessary to keep his +promise. But you will see, the day the English troops go, there +will be another massacre of Europeans. The army under Sir Wood will +join the Arabs; they are all savages together. To know the Arabs +you must have lived with them. They are like beasts. You take an +Arab servant, you treat him well, he poisons you on the first +opportunity; you beat him, perhaps he loves you. The English have +destroyed respect for the Khedive. He will be the first person +killed. There is no government in Egypt. The Khedive hates the +English. The Arabs hate the Khedive. The poor Europeans join the +Arabs against the English. Every one who is interested in the +country prays for Mr. Gladstone’s retirement from office. Then the +country will be annexed.’ I asked him about Arabi, whether the +Arabs still talked of him. He said: ‘They talk of him only as a +vagabond. They do not love any one except a man to beat them. Lord +Dufferin was told by his Government to give them a Constitution. He +has given them one. But if you ask him what he thinks of the Arabs, +he will tell you the same as I do. Commerce is ruined in the +country because we are all waiting to see what will happen. +Business does not go on. We keep our money in our pockets for fear. +The uncertainty destroys our confidence.’ Poor usurers!</p> + +<p>“<em>19th Sept.</em>—Another talk with Zogheb. He says: ‘The +whole question in Egypt is this—to what<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_50">[50]</span> extent could the fellah be replaced by other +labour? If he alone can dig and plough Europe <em>must</em> come to +terms with him.’ I have written out my programme for the +restoration of a National Government in Egypt carefully, and have +given it to Sabunji to translate. He is also translating the ‘Wind +and the Whirlwind.’</p> + +<p>“<em>20th Sept.</em>—Sabunji has made acquaintance with a young +Circassian, a naval officer. In common with the rest of the +Egyptian navy he took no part in the war, and detests the English +cordially. The Circassians, he said, were all against Tewfik +because he was a fool, and because he had betrayed the country to +the English. If it had not been for Tewfik and Sultan Pasha, the +English would have been driven out of Egypt with the courbash. +Tewfik gave all the plans of Tel-el-Kebir and the Wady to Wolseley, +and Sultan Pasha helped them with the Bedouins. He was very wroth +with Sultan Pasha, ‘a dog, the son of a Coptic dog.’ Asked about +possible substitutes for Tewfik, he said, ‘Nobody thinks of Halim. +A few would like Hassan but he is not so popular as his father. +Ismaïl is the man we all want.’ He was with Dervish Pasha when he +was arrested on his return to Constantinople. He says Dervish was +condemned to three years imprisonment, but is now at large. He is +young and a sailor, and has probably spoken the truth as regards +the general feeling of the Circassians. They were all with Arabi in +the last days and during the war, just as the Sultan was. They hate +the Arabs, but they hate the English more.</p> + +<p>“About three o’clock we sighted the P. and O. homeward mail, +with Malet probably on board.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st Sept.</em>—I asked my moneylending friends to-day at +breakfast their opinion of our various<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_51">[51]</span> officials in Egypt. Colvin they said was a +stupid fellow, quite ignorant of finance. He had come as an officer +of the Cadastral Survey, and had been pushed on by influence into +positions he was quite unfit for. Blignières was really a +financier, but Colvin, oh no! Baring? That was quite a different +thing. He was a man in a million. He and Blignières had done +everything between them that had been done for Egypt. Baring was a +master of finance, a man who knew his mind, and was as firm as a +rock. His appointment had made Egyptian stock go up already. Malet +was a diplomatist; he knew nothing of finance, he was neither liked +nor disliked; he was neither capable nor incapable. Dufferin had +been a great success; he was charming, gave parties, went to the +theatre, played cricket with the officers, conciliated everybody, +even the foreign Consuls. His report on Egypt was founded on the +truth, but it was full of <em>plaisanteries</em>. Wood<a id= +"FNanchor_11"></a><a href="#Footnote_11" class="fnanchor">[11]</a> +was an able man; he knew how to manage the natives. The Arabs were +like machines; they obeyed their officers. Zogheb is of opinion +they will continue to obey them, even after the Army of Occupation +is withdrawn.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd Sept.</em>—Arrived at Port Said during the night, and +sent Sabunji like a raven from the Ark to get intelligence. He came +back with the news that Ibrahim Tewfik is governor of the place, +the same agent of the Khedive who got up the trouble with the +Bedouins in Boheyra. He has, of course, been promoted and rewarded. +Sabunji got hold of a fellah and went the round of the shops with +him, looking in at the windows. In one of them there was a picture +of Arabi, and the man asked him if he knew it. Sabunji feigned +ignorance, and when the man<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_52">[52]</span> told him it was Arabi, asked if the people +still thought of him. The man answered ‘Some do.’ ‘How many?’ asked +Sabunji, ‘the greater or the smaller number?’ ‘Perhaps the +greater,’ said the man.</p> + +<p>“<em>24th Sept.</em>—Landed about midday at Suez, and spent the +remainder of the day with the Wests (the British Consul and his +wife). Senior wrote about them thirty years ago that they were +‘looking forward daily to their final departure from Suez,’ and +here they still are. West is a man who knows Egypt as well as, if +not better than, any Englishman in the country. His knowledge, +however, is a little out of date, though he spent three weeks as +acting Consul at Alexandria between the riots and the bombardment +last year. I had a long discussion of the financial position with +him. He was surprised when I told him of Colvin’s opinion of its +hopelessness. Colvin was here only the day before yesterday on his +way to India, but did not talk to him about finance. With regard to +the elections, he said that people would elect the man in the +district they were most afraid of. At Suez they had chosen the +Sub-Governor. In most places they would choose the chief of the +police.</p> + +<p>“I asked him about the riots at Alexandria. He was of opinion +that they were planned. He could not say who planned them. If it +was Omar Lutfi it must have been also the Khedive, for Omar Lutfi +was, and had always been, a devoted partisan of Tewfik. But he had +been of opinion when at Alexandria that it was Arabi. If it was in +fact the Khedive, the Foreign Office did quite right not to enquire +into it. Tewfik was our king in our game of chess, and our business +was to defend him. If anybody upset him we must put him on his legs +again. It<span class="pagenum" id="Page_53">[53]</span> didn’t do +to enquire too closely into those things. He had never seen Arabi, +so could not judge of his character.</p> + +<p>“West talked a good deal about the Palmer expedition; thought +Palmer had much overrated his power of bringing the Bedouins over +to the English side. Palmer had not seen the Terrabin Arabs or the +Howeytat. He, West, had thought his second expedition with Gill and +Charrington a very foolish one. All the Bedouins believed that the +Sultan had given Arabi the sword of Islam and that he must be +victorious. Of Colonel Warren’s method of examining the ‘guilty +ones’ he gave a graphic account. He used to pretend friendliness +with them, and drink coffee and smoke cigarettes and endeavour +through his interpreters—for he knew no word of Arabic—to trip them +up in conversation, and make them contradict each other. On this +kind of evidence he satisfied himself as to the identity of five +Bedouins as the men who had been actually told off to shoot Palmer +and his companions, but they were only the executioners. Ibn +Mershid was the Sheykh who gave the order, but Ibn Shedid, the +Howeytat Sheykh at Cairo, was afraid of him, and let him go. They +had got Ibn Mershid’s wife and children still in prison at Suez, +and twelve Bedouins in all charged with the affair. This is +monstrous. I shall apply to Baring for an order to see them, and +get them released.</p> + +<p>“<em>25th Sept.</em>—To Cairo by the morning train. On the road +there are still some traces of the war, at Shaluf some human bones +and a skull or two lying about, but less than one would expect. The +principal remains are the iron hoops of packing cases, and broken +tins of preserved meat. The celebrated lines of Tel-el-Kebir are, +after all, but a low bank and a very shallow dry ditch. They would +hardly stop a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_54">[54]</span> hunting +field. Cairo looks absolutely unchanged, but by reason of the time +of year there are hardly any foreigners in the town. The hotels are +empty; we have the Hôtel du Nil almost entirely to ourselves. The +only sign of English occupation that I have seen since landing in +Egypt has been three men in English uniform.</p> + +<p>“At dinner to-day I sat next Colonel Kelly, who is working the +police and constabulary under Baker Pasha. He gives an absurd +account of their functions, which are restricted to paying and +clothing the men, and ordering their promotion. They take all their +orders from the Prefect of police, who unites the functions of +chief constable, judge, jury, and framer of the laws. The Prefect +has under him a private service of spies, and neither Baker nor +this Colonel have any right to enquire either why people are +arrested, or what becomes of them afterwards. The Englishmen are +supposed to have a right of inspecting the prisons, but out of +Cairo and Alexandria they are prevented from really doing this by +the Mudirs who refuse them all access. Amongst the constabulary are +two battalions, 500 men each, one mounted, the other on foot, +composed entirely of Turks from Turkey. [This constabulary corps +was sent three months later with Baker to Souakin, where all +composing it were routed and slain by the Mahdists under Osman +Digna.]</p> + +<p>“<em>26th Sept.</em>—Sent a note to Baring early, asking for an +interview to talk over the political situation, and got a very +amiable answer, inviting me to breakfast. Baring, who looks about +fifty [he was really forty-two], imposes on one a good deal as a +man of sense and integrity, and, without being exactly brilliant, +seems capable of original ideas. He breakfasted with his suite, +among whom I found Aranghi,<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_55">[55]</span> Malet’s Greek dragoman, still in his same +office, and from the circumstance I did not augur well of any +change of policy. We talked about India, the Rajputs, Salar Jung, +and other interesting topics. Baring said that Salar Jung was the +finest looking Oriental he had ever met, with admirable manners, +and great dignity. The present state of things at Hyderabad was +much ‘mixed’ since his death, as all had depended on his personal +character.</p> + +<p>“After breakfast we went down to his room, which I knew so well +as Malet’s, and he asked me my views about the state of things in +Egypt. I gave him a sketch of the position two years ago, of the +parties in the Azhar, and the manner in which the Liberal party +there had been alienated from England, and the triumph of the +fanatical party on the restoration of the Khedive. He seemed to +agree with me that a reform should have a religious basis, but +would not admit that the Turks and Circassians were incapable of +this. He explained that he had come to Egypt originally as +representative of the Bondholders, and that he had always held the +interests of these and of Egypt to be identical. The Control had, +in fact, done great good. While Controller he had always refused to +act in too close concert with the Consul-General, as he held +himself to be above all things one of the Khedive’s officers. He +had found that by showing the chief personages, even Riaz, that he +only wished their good he had generally succeeded in making them do +as he wanted. I objected that he had not prevented Riaz’s cruelty, +his arbitrary arrests and persecutions. He said that Riaz’s fault +was that he saw things too <em>couleur de rose</em>, he would not +believe that neglecting the just claims of the soldiers would raise +a rebellion. With regard to finance, which we next discussed, I was +glad to find that Baring held<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_56">[56]</span> sound views on the point of the fellahin’s +debts. He was for settling them down to date, and restoring the old +state of the law, making mortgage impossible. He quite understood +the evils attending the mixed tribunals, as similar to those of the +Civil Courts in India. He said that they should be his first care. +He did not, however, seem at all hopeful of Egypt’s solvency. With +the introduction of a new system of government and the abolition of +the courbash, the financial prospect was a very doubtful one. He +talked about the elections as a novel experiment, which, if it had +not succeeded this time, might another. I explained to him that +there was no such novelty in it whatever, and that two years ago +there had been elections which <em>had</em> succeeded, and if these +last had not, it was because all liberty had been crushed. How +could a man vote independently as long as there was nothing in the +nature of <em>habeas corpus</em> to secure him from arbitrary +arrest? These arbitrary arrests were, with the debts, the reason of +the rebellion, and would be again. He promised to have this +provided against though ‘perhaps <em>habeas corpus</em> was too +much to give <em>all at once</em>.’ What the country wanted above +all was order and peace. I asked him if he did not think of +restoring the National Party, at least the civilian exiles; but he +said this was quite out of the question. They could not restore the +National Party without another revolution, and another revolution +could not be. He asked me whether the Nationalists had no leader in +Egypt; I said none that I knew of, the Reign of Terror had crushed +all courage out of the few who had not been exiled or imprisoned. +In conclusion he said, that as far as he was concerned, he should +support the Khedive and the Circassians with all his power. I saw +that it was useless talking further. Whatever Gladstone may dream +of, or pretend<span class="pagenum" id="Page_57">[57]</span> to +dream, it is clear the Foreign Office has not changed its +mind.”</p> + +<p>This conversation, which I transcribe as it stands in my diary, +is extremely interesting as showing the ideas with which Lord +Cromer started on his long career as Resident in Egypt. The last +part of it had been carried on in rather a heated tone, for I had +spoken my mind strongly on the impossibility of any attempt either +at carrying out the promised constitution, or even of introducing +practical reforms for the emancipation of the fellahin, through the +instrumentality of the Circassian ruling class. At the time Baring +refused to believe me, but he afterwards acknowledged the truth of +my view, though it was not till many years later, by practically +discarding all the Circassian Pashas from active participation in +the government. I did not speak to him of the part Gladstone had +had in my coming to consult him, saying only that I had come from +Downing Street, and that I understood that something in the nature +of a restoration of the National Party was there desired. I should +have spoken more plainly had he shown any indication of sharing +that idea, but it was clear from the outset that our views on this +subject were at a hopeless disaccord, and I left him much +disappointed. “This is an end therefore,” I wrote, “to any plans we +may have had in Egypt, and I have decided that we shall sail in the +British India boat on the 3rd.”</p> + +<p>As this was the first occasion on which I met the present Lord +Cromer of the many meetings of which mention will be made in these +memoirs, I will here, for the benefit especially of Egyptian +readers, attempt a sketch of his very remarkable personality, not +merely as I saw him first, but as it revealed itself to me in after +years. A member by birth of the well-known<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_58">[58]</span> London banking family, Baring Brothers, of +Dutch, it is generally said of Jewish, origin, Lord Cromer belonged +from the beginning of his career to the inner ring of the high +finance of Europe, and owed to it the cosmopolitan character, along +with the energy for work, and the clear business head +distinguishing those who compose it. Several members of the Baring +family have in the last hundred years entered English political +life, and have been raised to the peerage, and this with their +great wealth has given the family an influence in the official +world, wider perhaps than that of any other that can be named. +Evelyn Baring himself was sixth son of the head of the firm, and +having but a younger son’s portion was given the army as a +profession. He made his education at Woolwich, and served for +fourteen years in the artillery, without however seeing any active +service, and then in 1872 when his cousin, Lord Northbrook, also a +Baring, was appointed Governor-General of India, went to India with +him as his private secretary. Thus removed to civil employment, and +having left the army with the rank of Major, he found himself more +in his true element than as a soldier, and was able for the first +time to prove his administrative worth, and he did so with such +credit that, on Northbrook’s term of office in India coming to an +end in 1876, a well-paid financial post was found for him in Egypt, +first as Commissioner of the Public Debt, and then as +Comptroller-General of Finance. This was the beginning of Lord +Cromer’s Egyptian career.</p> + +<p>In 1880, the Whigs having once more come into office, Baring got +further advancement and returned to India with Lord Ripon, as his +Finance Minister. In all these posts he showed his family aptitude, +having precisely the qualities which money-dealing<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_59">[59]</span> on a large scale demands. He was +a man of integrity and prudence, with sufficient imagination, and +no more, to foresee events likely to affect the financial +situation, and he had the promptitude of will and ready +self-reliance required to deal with each as it arose successfully. +The same qualities served him, though in a less degree, as +administrator. Incapable, as I judge him, of any very original +conceptions, and with small powers of sympathy outside the narrow +school of English or rather European political thought in which he +was bred, he spent half a life time in the East without +understanding it or attempting to understand; also his judgement of +individuals was very fallible. Like all business men of practical +ability, his views were necessarily short ones, and he judged men +rather by a rapid calculation of averages, than by any clear +individual insight. Time in his busy life was too valuable to waste +in long deliberation, or in reconsidering a course once resolved +on; a judgement pronounced, whether on men or things, was always +with him the <em>chose jugée</em>, which was not worth further +discussion. It must stand or fall on the merits assigned to it, and +could not block the way to new cases.</p> + +<p>Personally I liked Lord Cromer. He had a reputation for +rudeness, but I do not think it was justified; at least he was +never rude to me. On the contrary, I found it a pleasure to talk +with him, as I often did in later years at Cairo on public +business. He was always so concise and to the point. He did not +affect the mystery diplomatists mostly indulge in, nor care to +deceive or flatter, unless it might be a travelling journalist or a +too inquisitive M.P., whom he had an object in cajoling. In talk +with me he was generally sincere, whether in agreement or +disagreement; our views were not often the same,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_60">[60]</span> but when they differed he did +not resent speech in me as plain as his own. Above all he was quick +to understand, and as quick to decide; it was the secret of his +long success on his own lines in Egypt. His failure, when it came, +was due, I think, to what the French call the defect of his +qualities, his excessive economy of time which limited his view to +work immediately in hand, and his lack of the larger imagination +which once or twice at critical moments left him blind.</p> + +<p>Such I found him personally. With a pen in his hand, however, +and when writing with a view to publicity, Lord Cromer was by no +means the plain direct man I found him in his private talk. His +yearly reports, so far from being straightforward, are models of +insincerity, especially those written in his later years, when the +habit of political make-believe had grown upon him with the double +part he was daily called to play in the “Veiled Protectorate.” No +one knew better than he how, with a show of frankness, to conceal +an inconvenient truth, and how by the admission of a minor error of +judgement a larger mistake could be left undealt with. He +understood, too, in great perfection the art, through praise of his +subordinates, to praise, without seeming it, himself. Year after +year his reports used to be published, making an impression on the +public mind of being the simple record of great things performed by +one careless of personal fame, and at the same time so superior to +his readers in his knowledge of his subject as to have the right to +say: “This, I and those with me did; that we left undone; the +result is what you see.” To me, who knew more of Egypt than the +public knew, his reports revealed themselves as less candid, and +very much less modest. Reading them, they always +reminded<span class="pagenum" id="Page_61">[61]</span> me of those +first chapters of the Book of Genesis in which at the end of each +day of Creation “The Lord saw all the work that he had done, and +found it very good.” Yet, if we turn to the same reports now in the +light of later experience, we recognize easily enough how +vain-glorious and how fallacious most of them are. As to his value +as a historian, his book, “Modern Egypt,” is not history at all in +any sense of being a dependable record of things which actually +happened as they happened. It is a long piece of special pleading +in regard to his own administrative achievements, in which the +defects concealed at the time have latterly become very visible. +Lord Cromer never seems to have taken the trouble to consult any +native authority, or to have gone further afield than the Blue +Books for his knowledge of events unconnected with his own special +work. Even about these he is occasionally inaccurate, and seldom +quite sincere. As a diagnosis of the land he lived in for so many +years without really seeing it—for his mornings were spent at his +desk, and his evenings in the European society of Cairo—his final +judgements are fallacious through ignorance, the work of a stranger +to Egypt rather than of one so long resident there. His prediction +of the future of Islam is a fallacy already proved; and his +adoption of Lord Milner’s foolish phrase about Egypt being the +“Land of Paradox,” a confession of ignorance inexcusable in one +with such long experience, and not a trifle absurd.</p> + +<p>But to resume my journal.</p> + +<p>The few days that I still spent in Egypt before taking steamer +for Colombo showed me only too clearly how hopeless the political +position was. On the 27th I called on Sir Benson Maxwell, who had +recently been appointed Adviser to the Egyptian<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_62">[62]</span> Government in the Department of +Justice, which it was designed to reform. “He received me with +great cordiality, saying that, although rowing in a different boat +from mine, he had great sympathy with my ideas. He is a most +liberal-minded man, but, like Baring, he thinks he has discovered a +vein of liberal feeling among the Turks. Tewfik, Sherif, and Fakri, +he believes, are opposed to Constantinople and jealous of Egypt’s +independence. He thinks the Turks born to rule, the Arabs to obey. +The Turks could be taught justice under English guidance; they +wished the English to stay and help them. Ali Mubarak (but he is an +Egyptian) had besought him not to desert them till their scheme of +justice was in working order. He had a great respect for Sherif +(the then Prime Minister) as an honest and good man. I told him the +first thing he ought to do was to abolish arbitrary arrest, and he +explained that something of the sort was included in his plan, but +nothing will be so much as begun before Christmas. I told him of +the case of the Bedouin women and children in prison at Suez, which +moved his indignation. It was military law, he said, not justice. +We will see if anything comes of it. Maxwell is an honest man and +really believes what he says, which is more than most of them do, +but I am afraid the Turks are making a fool of him. He will do his +best and fail, and go home, as many another has done before him. He +goes home on leave in a couple of days; his business of reforming +justice being at a standstill. He thought very little of Dufferin’s +charter, but the odd thing is, they all imagine it to be the first +suggestion in the direction of free government ever made in +Egypt.”</p> + +<p>The prediction I have just quoted of Sir Benson Maxwell’s +failure in Egypt was amply verified the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_63">[63]</span> following year, when, failing to get his +reforms adopted by the Khedive’s Government, and being +ill-supported by Baring, he finally retired from Egypt.</p> + +<p>“Met Lionel Moore (formerly Oriental secretary at the Embassy at +Constantinople) and went shopping with him in the Bazaar. He was +very communicative, and told me amusing stories connected with the +events of June and July at Alexandria. He was staying with Cookson +on the day of the riot, and had been out driving in the direction +of Ramleh. On coming in to the Consulate at 3, Cookson asked him to +go to the Governor’s, Omar Lutfi’s, because he, Cookson, had been +wounded, and might not survive the day. He was to deliver this +message: he was to ask Omar Lutfi if he could put down the riot +with the soldiers, or whether he, Cookson, should ask help from the +ships. He had accordingly gone to the Governor’s house, and had +found him sitting with Tulba at about 3.30, and, on delivering his +message, Omar Lutfi had referred him to the officers, who rudely +answered that there would be safety for all ‘<em>Amàn li +jamia</em>’; he had accordingly gone up to Tulba and called him a +rascal, and bade him provide for the safety of the town. On this +Tulba, who had his sword across his knees, half drew it, and Moore, +who had provided himself with a heavy stick, put himself in a +defensive attitude, and defied him to come on and he would take his +sword from him, whereupon Omar Lutfi and the rest had pushed him +out of the room, and downstairs, and out of the house. Another +story was that he had gone with Beresford to help him to sketch one +of the forts, and had detained the soldiers talking while the other +made his drawing. Then he had gone away to Syria, and did not come +back till after the war. We talked about Malet. He said he was the +most incapable<span class="pagenum" id="Page_64">[64]</span> man in +diplomacy. He knew how to turn a dispatch so as to please the +Foreign Office, but he was absolutely ignorant of everything that +went on in Egypt. I reminded him of what he had told me last year +of the arrangement made at that time (January 1882) between the +English and French Governments, whereby it was agreed that in case +of intervention, a French force should land, and the English fleet +should watch the seaports. The agreement held good till Gambetta’s +fall. Going up the Mouski he told me that Tewfik had not a single +friend in the country. The Circassians and all were against him. +Halim would be a better man. He thought Arabi honest, but Tulba and +Mahmud Sami were poor scoundrels. He did not believe in the Arabs. +Baring had promised him a place, because he was the only Englishman +in Cairo, with Rogers, who knew Arabic.” [N.B.—An entire libel on +Mahmud Sami, who was a very distinguished man. But Tulba was of +small account.]</p> + +<p>This Lionel Moore was an Irishman by birth, a man of ability, +much wit, and a great knowledge of the East and Eastern languages. +He had been born in Syria, his father having been Consul at +Jerusalem, and he spoke Arabic almost as his mother tongue, so that +he was commonly known in diplomacy as the Irish Arab. He was +brother of the Colonel Moore mentioned in my “India under Ripon” as +A.D.C. to the Duke of Connaught; and he himself, as Oriental +secretary at Constantinople, had accompanied the then Prince of +Wales in his tour in Palestine, and had remained a favourite with +the Prince. He was one of the <em>habitués</em> of Marlborough +House when in England. He had, however, been obliged to leave the +diplomatic service on account of a mysterious illness which had +attacked him, and kept him, if I<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_65">[65]</span> remember rightly, for two years +semi-unconscious at the Buckingham Palace Hotel. On recovery he was +a changed man, and had never fully regained the use of his wits, +though he remained talkative and amusing. But for this weakness, he +would undoubtedly have been given the re-employment he sought, for +there was no man in Egypt who could speak Arabic as he did of the +purest kind and with a knowledge of its literature, and a power of +quotation such as he possessed. He lived on for several years after +this, and died some time in the eighties.</p> + +<p>“Anne went yesterday to see Arabi’s wife, and has gone to-day to +see some of the other ladies. They tell her that all the people +here have the idea that the exiles will soon come back, that they +are protected by a high personage in England, and that Tewfik is to +go away. The soldiers, too, think this.</p> + +<p>“<em>28th Sept.</em>—To breakfast with Moore, who told us much +what he had told me yesterday. He said most emphatically that +Tewfik had not a single friend in the country, and could not stay +when the English were gone. Then to Ali Fehmy’s house, a sad visit. +Last time I was there I sat with him and Arabi in the garden +talking about the Sultan; now all is empty. The old porter was full +of tears and thanks, and told us how happy the world would be if +his master returned. We went on to another small house to see Ali +Fehmy’s daughter, a nice little Egyptian girl with a pleasant +voice, who talked sensibly about things. She is not married yet, +and I went upstairs with Anne to see her. I have written to Eddy +Hamilton telling him of my disappointment at the state of things +here, and to Sanua. I have also applied to the Domains Commissioner +for the title-deeds of my property at Sheykh Obeyd.</p> + +<p>“<em>29th Sept.</em>—Hotter than ever. Started at +5.30<span class="pagenum" id="Page_66">[66]</span> for our garden +(Sheykh Obeyd) and stopped at Matarieh to meet Sabunji and his +friend Count Gerouais, with whom he had been staying at Ramleh. The +Gerouais are Syrians, ennobled some generations back by the Papal +Court, and, what is strange, they are ardent Nationalists. We found +Sabunji disguised in his proper dress of an Abbé, which gives him a +most respectable appearance. They brought us news, though less than +we expected, the most important being that Gerouais had sent his +black servant to Damanhur to look for Sheykh Mohammed Khalil, and +had returned with the tale that he had died a month before of +cholera. His account showed the suspicion and terror of the country +districts, for the people he enquired of besought him one and all +to depart out of their coasts, an account which exactly corresponds +with one brought me yesterday, in answer to enquiries I had made +for other friends, of the Boab (gate-keeper) of the Azhar.”</p> + +<p>The news of Khalil’s death distressed me much, as it was that of +my earliest friend at the Azhar, Mohammed Abdu’s most devoted +disciple. Poor man! as I afterwards learnt, he had been driven out +of the Azhar on the Khedive’s restoration on account of his +connection with me, and had wandered about afterwards with a heart +broken over the misfortunes of his country. He was of the salt of +the earth, and his persecution shows how relentlessly the best men +of the Liberal Party were tracked and punished by the reactionaries +whom we had replaced in power.</p> + +<p>“We found our garden undamaged, and gathered a dozen large +pomegranates to take to Arabi. During the war the Mudir of the +district had had the house broken into and had taken some of our +things, including 17 rifles, some pistols, and the small brass +cannon I had bought two years ago for Ibn Rashid<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_67">[67]</span> (the Emir of Hail), an act which +formed the basis of the French fiction of my having bought a house +and stored it as a ‘veritable arsenal’ before the war. The things +were taken to the citadel.<a id="FNanchor_12"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_12" class="fnanchor">[12]</a> We returned at half-past +twelve, entertained Moore at breakfast, and afterwards went with +him to the Boulac Museum. After dinner Gerouais came with old Salim +Basalim and his son. From the old man we learnt a good deal about +the feeling of the people at Cairo. All classes, high and low, hate +Tewfik, but are in terror of their lives. His spies are everywhere, +but, where two or three are gathered together, they long for the +return of the exiles. I asked him what the people thought about me, +and he said: ‘Out of four two would be delighted to see you, and +would say so, one would be delighted but would not say so, and one +would not care.’ At first, after the war, people said: ‘What has +Mr. Blunt been doing that we hear nothing of him,’ and they were +angry, saying he had deserted them, but when Napier and Broadley +came they knew that he was still their friend. I explained the +political situation in England as far as it affected Egypt, the +difference of ideas between the two parties, the one which would +annex, the other which would leave Egypt, Lord Granville’s +illiberal ideas, and Mr. Gladstone’s character. I bade him tell his +friends not to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_68">[68]</span> lose +heart, that it was impossible the present <em>régime</em> could +last, that with patience they would see the exiles back, and the +party of liberty restored. He promised to spread this opinion +everywhere, and said: ‘There are many in this town who, if they +knew you had passed down the street, would kiss the dust of your +footsteps.’ Then he looked about him in a frightened way, and said +he must go. They are all in terror of their lives.</p> + +<p>“<em>30th Sept.</em>—In the morning came Ali, our head gardener, +who finished his narrative of the seizure of our property. I told +him the people were donkeys, seeing I was the only friend they had +had in England during the war. He said they did not know what they +were doing. They had wanted to cut the water and take the coals of +the engine, but fortunately were prevented, or the garden would +have been ruined.</p> + +<p>“Next came a nephew of Arabi’s, who had been living on what was +left of the family estate near Zagazig. I asked him about the +elections. He said the fellahin were frightened at being put down +on the register, and understood it as a device for enlisting them +in the army, but he was afraid of talking. He was followed by +Suliman Nashaat, a brother of Abd-el-Aal’s, who was more +courageous. He confirmed what the other had told about the +elections. In the towns the Governor or the Prefect of police had +sent round privately to tell the people who they were expected to +choose, and there was no opposition possible. Dufferin’s +Constitution would be well enough if they had an honest ruler, one +who desired liberty, but under Tewfik it was quite useless. There +had never been such tyranny in Egypt before, not even under Ismaïl +Pasha. Ismaïl had taken people’s money, but they were not molested +as now by the police. They were imprisoned now, and put to death on +false<span class="pagenum" id="Page_69">[69]</span> charges, so +that there were many who wished Ismaïl back. Many of the +Circassians were now of the party of liberty, and wished a return +of the exiles. The party of liberty did not wish ill to the +Europeans, and were at one with the Copts and the Coptic Patriarch, +while Boutros<a id="FNanchor_13"></a><a href="#Footnote_13" class= +"fnanchor">[13]</a> and other rich Copts were on the side of +Tewfik. As soon as the English troops went the people would rise +against Tewfik and kill him. The soldiers would kill their English +officers—they were all ready. I told him that would be very +foolish. He reproached Arabi with having run away from +Tel-el-Kebir; Arabi, he said, used to take three hours saying his +prayers instead of attending to his business. It was not the place +of a commander to pray so much and run away so soon, and many +complained that he had thus lost his honour. Still the people liked +him because he was good, but he was more of an <em>alem</em> than a +soldier. His own brother, Abd-el-Aal, would not have run away. +Abd-el-Aal had written over and over again to ask to be sent to +Tel-el-Kebir, and he had been the last to surrender. This is quite +true. He then gave a touching picture of the death of Yusuf Abu +Diab, his brother’s aide-de-camp, who was hanged at Tantah by the +Khedive for saving the lives of Christians. Anne has written the +account down in full. He, Suliman Nashaat was in prison with Yusuf, +and afterwards went with him to the gallows, and received his last +words. Suliman Sami he had known well. It was true that Suliman had +burned Alexandria against Arabi’s orders, but he was hanged because +he would not give up certain papers. Kandil had had papers, and he +was promised<span class="pagenum" id="Page_70">[70]</span> his life +if he would hold his tongue about the riots of June. There were +plenty of people who would give witness if the case was gone into +against the Khedive. In the Azhar every one was frightened. El +Abbasi, the new Sheykh El Islam, hated liberty. El Edwi, one of the +most courageous Sheykhs, had been exiled to his village, but the +Khedive thought now of sending him to the Mahdi to find out what +his views were. Suliman evidently sympathizes with the Mahdi, and +half believes in him. He said the issue would show whether he was +sent by God. Anne has gone to see Princess Inja Hanum.</p> + +<p>“<em>1st Oct.</em>—Last night a young man looked in who +explained that he was a friend of Wahby Bey’s, and that he had been +arrested with twenty-five others on a charge of having been +connected with a Frenchman who went by the name of Mohammed Said, +and had formed or pretended to form a society against the English +called ‘Les Vengeurs.’ His only connection with him was that the +Frenchman had come to lodge in his house, and would not go away. +They had all been brought before a mixed commission, on which two +Belgians had sat, and their release was ordered. But Osman Pasha +Ghaleb, the Prefect of police, had detained most of them by +superior orders from the Palace on suspicion. The man Husseyn Bey +brought me a letter from one of them, Abd el Razak Bey, F.R.G.S., +ex-director of the Naval College, written in very good English, and +asking me to come and see him in the Zaptieh prison. Accordingly I +wrote this morning to Sir E. Baring, asking permission to pay the +visit, but as no answer came, and as we are going away to-morrow, I +went with Husseyn Bey to try and get in. The discipline of the +prison is so lax that this was easy enough. The man at the door +brought a key for the asking, but they only let us<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_71">[71]</span> stay a few minutes. I got out of +Razak, however, a most valuable piece of information. He was in +prison with Kandil, and knows he had papers connecting the Khedive +with the riots of June. Omar Lutfi got them from Kandil on a +promise of saving his life, but they meant all the same to hang +him, as they did Suliman Sami, who also had compromising documents. +I found with Abd el Razak in the prison four others, Mohammed +Effendi Fenni, late chief interpreter of the Council of Ministers, +Mustafa Bey Sidki, a brother of Husseyn Bey, a landed proprietor at +Shubra, Huseyn Sagr, and Saad-el-Zagloul, assistant editor of the +‘Wakaya’ under Mohammed Abdu.<a id="FNanchor_14"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_14" class="fnanchor">[14]</a> All these gave me messages +to Arabi, and begged me to look after their interests. Then we were +hurried away.</p> + +<p>“Went with Suliman to pay some visits to distinguished members +of the Party of Liberty as the National Party is now called. The +first house we called at was Emin Bey Shemsi’s, late deputy for +Zagazig, and chairman of a section; he had with him three friends, +one whom he introduced as a philosopher, another a tall vigorous +young fellow, and a third, an old fellah Notable from his own town. +Shemsi used to be a country neighbour and personal friend of +Arabi’s. He is a very intelligent man, and of some courage too, or +he would not have received us, for he was only let out of prison a +few months ago, and is still watched by spies. I asked him to tell +the history of the two crises in which the Notables were concerned +last year. In the first, that which resulted in Sherif’s fall, +there was, he told us, very little difference of opinion. Sultan +Pasha alone<span class="pagenum" id="Page_72">[72]</span> supported +Sherif. In the second, when Mahmud Sami summoned the Chamber, they +were more divided. They met at Sultan Pasha’s house before the +whole of their number had arrived at Cairo, and Sultan at first got +thirty to side with him, leaving forty-five in favour of the +Ministry. But on the occasion of the second meeting, when the +windows were broken by the mob and Arabi made his famous speech +after the receipt of my telegram, Sultan was left alone. There was +no doubt in the world that all Cairo, deputies, Ulema, merchants, +and mob, insisted on Arabi’s return to power.</p> + +<p>“They then asked me to explain how it had come about, that with +Mr. Gladstone and the Liberal Party in power, there had been a war +against liberty, and I explained to them the financial conditions +on which the matter hinged, and the divergence between Mr. +Gladstone and Lord Granville. They were full of gratitude to me for +the attempt I had made to get them justice, and asked me what they +were to do now to get themselves out of the hands of their tyrants. +I said it was first necessary to prove to the world that they +detested Tewfik, and desired the return of Arabi, and I asked +Shemsi about the possibility of electing Arabi for the Chamber at +Cairo. They laughed lugubriously, and explained how the elections +were managed. The voting took place in the police station, under +the superintendence of the police, and at each station there were +men in plain clothes to watch the voting and direct the election on +the part of the Government. A man who should have the courage to +write Arabi’s name on his paper would at once be hustled away, and +he and his family would be ruined. ‘You don’t understand,’ he said, +‘how these things are done with us. It would be impossible that any +one should so much as speak of Arabi.<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_73">[73]</span> If the election were free, every one in Cairo +would vote for him.’ I said: ‘If this is so, you have nothing to do +but to make a new revolt; the English troops are to be withdrawn in +the spring, and you must then get the Egyptian army on your side. +People must be ready to revolt once and twice and thrice for +liberty. Then they obtain it.’ There was a division of opinion as +to the probability of the soldiers joining. But they seemed to +think the English officers had them under their thumbs, and they +next proposed to go as a committee to London to lay their distress +before the English Government. I said I would do what I could to +help them in this. But if things are thus, their case is nearly +hopeless. The revolt, to be of any use, should be immediately on +the departure of our troops, for with Lord Salisbury in power it +would only serve as a pretext for annexation. Shemsi and the +philosopher seemed to dread the departure of the English troops. As +long as Lord Dufferin had been here there was a check, but Malet +aided and encouraged Tewfik in his vengeance. We were to have met +at their house the telegraph clerk, Mustafa Bey, who sent the +message from Tewfik to Omar Lutfi ordering the riot at Alexandria, +but he was too frightened to come.</p> + +<p>“Our next visit was to an ex-Mudir, a man of superior education +and good manners. We asked him about the reception recently given +to Tewfik in the provinces. His answer was, ‘If Riaz Pasha, who is +my worst enemy, were to come to see me, what should I do? I should +meet him with a band of music at the door. When we fear a man we +meet him with a smile; dark looks would bring endless trouble on +our heads.’ He seemed less timorous, however, than Shemsi, though +he too had been in prison, and came in the evening to repay our +visit.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_74">[74]</span>“Sabunji has got +tired of being at Matarieh, and has come into the town. This is +foolish of him as he may get into trouble, but I have told him we +must all be off back to Suez to-morrow. Husseyn Bey came again at +nightfall to say that my visit to the prison is known, and that the +sentries have been put under arrest. He wants me to write to Baring +to ask his protection. If I do, I must of course tell Baring that I +went without his permission. It is curious that of all the people I +have seen not one will hear of English annexation, even as an +escape from imprisonment and persecution. They all declare they +would then revolt against any odds.</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd Oct.</em>—This morning Baring’s answer has come. He +regrets that he ‘cannot give me the order asked for to visit the +prison, such matters being settled by the Egyptian Government, +etc.’ Rot! I shall write and tell him I have seen the prisoners, +and recommend them to his protection.” I did so in a letter dated +3rd October, with the speedy and satisfactory result that on the +6th October Sir Evelyn Baring wrote the following short dispatch to +Lord Granville:</p> + +<p>“I have the honour to inclose a copy of an important circular +issued to the Mudirs of the several provinces by the Minister of +the Interior. It is to be hoped that the issue of this circular +will have the effect of clearing the gaols of all persons who are +improperly or unnecessarily detained in prison.” And again 10th +October: “I have the honour to inclose herewith, extracted from the +‘Moniteur Egyptien’ of the 9th inst., a decree granting a general +amnesty to all offenders accused of crimes connected with the +rebellion, except to those accused of murder or rape.”</p> + +<p>Saad Zagloul and the rest of those with him in prison were +consequently released. I learned the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_75">[75]</span> news a few weeks later in Ceylon, and that it +was due to my intervention, though I cannot remember that any of +the prisoners wrote personally to thank me. My action on their +behalf was, I believe, a chief reason for my exclusion from Egypt +during the following three years, for Baring resented my +interference with what ought to have been his sole business. There +is a passage in his “Modern Egypt” which displays his displeasure +and makes complaint of my correspondence with Mr. Gladstone through +Hamilton. His representations, however, to the Foreign Office that +it should be discontinued did not have the full effect he supposes, +though it made Hamilton cautious. Gladstone’s answer to Granville, +which Cromer with somewhat puerile malice quotes, proves nothing +more than that the two Ministers were in different camps about +Egypt, and that Gladstone was anxious to minimize to his colleague +the attention he paid to my opinion. Granville never forgave my +action in Egypt in 1882, but Gladstone knew that I had been right, +though he did not dare avow it publicly. He allowed Hamilton still +to remain in touch with me, as will be seen in the course of the +present volume, as long as he was in office. All that Cromer was +able to effect when he discovered that I had told the Prime +Minister the truth, was that having shortly after assumed the +<em>rôle</em> of masterly Resident he decreed my exclusion from +Egypt, and induced the Foreign Office to support him in continuing +it till 1886. My relations, however, with the other side of Downing +Street continued on a friendly footing as long as Gladstone +remained in power, while Cromer himself some years afterwards came +round to my views and tried to get up a native Egyptian Ministry +favourable to England out of the <em>débris</em> of the Nationalist +Party, going even to the length of consulting<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_76">[76]</span> me about those capable of composing it; +but it was then too late, and English policy in Egypt has +floundered ever since in a Serbonian bog of irreconcilable native +hostility. He would have done better to have taken my advice in +1883.</p> + +<p>“The ‘Phare d’Alexandrie’ has a long article describing the +displeasure of the Khedive at my arrival, and at the visits paid me +by relations of the exiles, and there is also rather a nice +paragraph in an Arabic paper saying that I had returned to Cairo, +and that feasts would have been prepared for me, but those who +should have been my hosts were no longer there—strangers had come +to eat up the banquet. We have left Cairo for Suez. Gerouais was at +the station to see us off with Sabunji, who, thank God, has not +been arrested.”</p> + +<p>This is my last entry while in Egypt that year. From Cairo and +again from Suez I wrote two long letters to Hamilton for Mr. +Gladstone’s reading, one on 28th September, two days after I had +seen Baring, and a second on 3rd October, immediately before +embarking for Ceylon. These will be found in the <a href= +"#Page_572">Appendix</a>.</p> + +<p>The next six months, following on this brief visit to Cairo, +were spent by me in Ceylon and India, an account of which will be +found already published in my volume, “India under Ripon.” The only +thing I did that winter of importance for Egypt more than is there +recorded was to obtain from Arabi and his companions in exile at +Colombo a clear statement of the policy they would recommend, drawn +up more or less on the lines of Arabi’s memorandum of the year +before, with such additions to it as the events of the intervening +twelve months might have suggested, especially in regard to the +Soudan and Dufferin’s unworkable charter. The document, +embodied<span class="pagenum" id="Page_77">[77]</span> in a letter +I sent to the “Times” on 5th November and published 13th December, +is one of historical importance, and will be found in the <a href= +"#appe">Appendix.</a></p> + +<p>It reiterates the truth which underlay the whole Egyptian +position, namely, that the supposed necessity of maintaining Tewfik +on the Khedivial throne at Cairo must, if persisted in, vitiate any +attempt to restore self-government to the Egyptians, or to free +England from the prolonged responsibility of protecting him with an +occupying force. It suggests in what way Constitutional Government +could be restored, and enumerates a variety of reforms, most of +which have been subsequently made part of English policy. About the +Soudan, too, the affairs of which were about to become a main +subject of interest for those responsible for Egypt’s welfare, it +contains a remarkable paragraph, which may be taken as the text of +what will be found in the following few chapters of this volume. +And be it noted that at the time it was written, 3rd November, no +one at Cairo, still less in London, had begun to perceive the truth +that other than military means were necessary to deal with the +situation created by the Mahdi’s rebellion, if a great misfortune, +both for Egypt and for the Soudan, was to be avoided. Arabi, who as +Nationalist Minister of War in 1882, had been responsible for the +appointment of Abd-el-Kader Pasha to the post of Governor-General +at Khartoum, and who in the common interests of the two countries +had put himself into communication with the Mahdi, and was to a +certain point in sympathy with the cause Mohammed Ahmed represented +as being that of a revolt against the Turco-Circassian tyranny they +had alike suffered from, was in a far better position to understand +how the difficulty should be<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_78">[78]</span> dealt with than any of those in whose hands +its solution now lay, and it is certain that, had he been able to +maintain himself against Wolseley at Tel-el-Kebir, no difficulty +whatever would have arisen in regard to retaining Khartoum, or even +eventually of recovering the lost provinces, had such been in the +designs of nationalized Egypt. The passage is as follows:</p> + +<p>“Although he (Arabi) is of opinion that a certain connection +will always be necessary between the lower and upper waters of the +Nile, he holds that in the present military and financial position +of Egypt it is unwise to attempt the reconquest of all or, perhaps, +of any of the lost provinces. He believes that the movement of the +so-called Mahdi is not one merely of fanaticism, or that it is only +a revolt of the slave-dealers. He thinks that Mohammed Ahmed +commands the goodwill of the inhabitants, and that it would be far +wiser for the Egyptian Government to come to terms with him than to +continue their military operations against him. The Soudan brings +nothing into the Cairo treasury, and if Egypt is to enjoy liberty +at home she should avoid ideas of conquest abroad. The terms that +could be made with the Mahdi Arabi has been too long out of Egypt +to judge; but from the communications which reached him while in +power he does not believe a friendly arrangement admitting Egypt’s +suzerainty impossible. The suzerainty of Egypt the Soudanese would +probably be glad to admit, for it would protect them against +European aggression.”</p> + +<p>This question of the Soudan was being already much discussed +among the exiles while I was in Ceylon, though the defeat of Hicks +was not yet known. And, as it was to become a main subject of +interest to us all during the next two years, I may<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_79">[79]</span> as well here present the general +case of it as it appeared to Nationalist eyes, for it will enable +readers better to understand both my own point of view and that +prevalent at the time in Egypt. It will serve, too, as a corrective +to the false light in which it is seen and described by nearly all +European writers, who fail to understand that Europe itself was the +sole responsible cause of the trouble. This is how I, looking at +the matter, so to say, with Oriental eyes, saw and see it.</p> + +<p>The revolt in the Soudan stood in close analogy with that in +Lower Egypt. Both had a double character, beginning as the natural +rebellion of a people against long misgovernment, and taking later +a religious complexion when Christian Europe had intervened in +support of the tyrannical ruler against the people. The only +difference between the two cases lay in the fact that, whereas in +Egypt the reformers were enlightened men, representing the humaner +and more progressive side of Islam, the Soudanese reformers were +reactionary and fanatical. It cannot be too strongly insisted on +that the great, the capital wrong committed by our English +Government in 1882 was less the destruction of the hopes of free +government in Egypt as a nation, than the treacherous blow its +armed intervention struck everywhere at the aspirations of liberal +Islam. Arabi, a devout but the least fanatical of Moslems, had come +in 1882 to represent not Egypt only, but every Mohammedan land +alarmed at the encroachment of Christendom and looking to +constitutional reform as its surest safety. And it was just this +leader of reform that constitutional and Liberal England chose to +strike down. What wonder then that the defeat at Tel-el-Kebir +should have been taken through all Mohammedan lands as a set back +to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_80">[80]</span> reform, an impulse +to reaction? At Constantinople it had the immediate effect of +putting all power into the hands of the Sultan Abdul Hamid’s +fanatical following, and of enabling him to crush what remained of +the constitutional party and the party of religious liberalism. In +Persia it had consequences of much the same reactionary nature, and +throughout North Africa it determined the whole character of +religious thought on lines of fiercely bitter hatred of +Christendom. The French invasion of Tunis had been answered by the +counter-move of the fighting fraternity of the Senussia. The +English invasion of Egypt was answered by Mohammed Ahmed’s +appearance in the Soudan as Mahdi. It made it therefore imperative +in 1883, if the Soudan was not to be lost to the fanatics, that +without delay a liberal Mohammedan Government should be restored at +Cairo capable of attracting to it the humaner elements of Islam, +and pitting them against the less humane. Had this been done by the +end of the year 1882, and the English army withdrawn from Cairo, +the situation at Khartoum could have been saved without recourse to +arms. Otherwise an English occupation of Khartoum was the sole +alternative to an immediate and complete abandonment of the whole +of the Upper Nile.</p> + +<p>What was done, as we know, was to take neither one course nor +the other. It was decided that Tewfik was to be maintained at +Cairo, propped up by British bayonets; and at Khartoum that his +authority was to be restored without any military propping +whatever—the authority of Tewfik, who had come to be regarded as a +renegade to Islam, almost as a <em>Kafr</em>, the docile servant of +a Christian Power! Was it to be expected that the Soudanese, a +fiercely Mohammedan population, proud of their<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_81">[81]</span> Arab descent and of their anti-crusading +ancestry, should accept the domination of one so contemptible, +re-imposed on them by a Christian general and without a Christian +army at his back? Naturally and inevitably, no! There was, besides, +a special reason for anger against Tewfik, which I do not find +recorded in any history of the time, but which largely contributed +to the detestation in which he was held among the Soudanese. One of +the first acts of the restored regime at Cairo had been to arrest +the supreme head of the Malekite rite, which is that prevalent in +the Soudan and throughout North Africa, Sheykh El Aleysh, a +venerable and highly revered personage, who was treated with the +utmost indignity, and, as was currently reported, was done to death +in prison by the Khedive’s order. The news of this impiety was to +the Soudanese a new proof of Tewfik’s apostate character, and made +a reconciliation between him and them doubly impossible. Add to it +the folly of recalling Abd-el-Kader, and replacing him with the +corrupt and incapable Court favourite Ala-ed-Din Pasha, and giving +him Hicks, an Englishman, but without an English military backing, +as his Chief of the Staff, and we see the full madness from a +Moslem point of view of the attempt made in the spring of 1883 to +retain the Soudan; while perhaps the crowning folly of all was to +reinforce the Khedivial garrison at Khartoum with the broken +remnants of Arabi’s army disbanded after Tel-el-Kebir, and +recruited afresh for Tewfik’s service. Colonel Stewart, who was +sent by Dufferin that winter of 1882-83 to report on the condition +of things in the Soudan, describes the army Hicks was about to +command as a congregation of raw undisciplined recruits mixed with +others on the point of mutiny. “The question,” he says, +“is<span class="pagenum" id="Page_82">[82]</span> whether they will +remain faithful or desert, knowing as they will that the Mahdi will +not harm them. . . . At one of the late skirmishes they were heard +complaining, ‘O Effendina Arabi! If you knew the position Tewfik +has placed us in.’”</p> + +<p>Certain historians have laid stress on the distinction to be +drawn between the policy of sending Hicks to hold Khartoum and the +insanity of sending him, with an army so disaffected and so ready +to mutiny, against the Mahdi in Kordofan. Hicks, they say, might +have held his own at Khartoum if the Egyptian Government had been +content to leave him there. I see no warrant for believing this. +Hicks did his best and was a gallant officer, but he was from the +first a doomed man, as Gordon after him was doomed. The fact of +their Christianity, and of their holding Tewfik’s commission, made +it impossible for either of them to succeed in stemming the +rebellion; and, though both were able to hold out for a while, +nothing but a backing of European troops could have saved them from +failure. Hicks, just as Gordon did, gained at the outset an +ephemeral advantage, but only to be replied to by the revolt of the +Eastern provinces in favour of the Madhi; and, left without English +help, he would have been beleaguered at Khartoum, as Gordon was, +and compelled, as Gordon was, to surrender. His advance into +Kordofan only accelerated his ruin.</p> + +<p>As to this expedition, for which Tewfik and his Ministers and +Malet were jointly responsible, it has been the fashion to consider +it an act of reckless folly on the part of the Egyptian Government, +of lack of intelligent prescience on the part of Malet. It was in +my opinion something more criminal than this. On the part of the +Khedive and Sherif, and<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_83">[83]</span> especially of Omar Lutfi, the Minister of +War, it was a deliberate scheme to rid themselves of the last +remnant of Arabi’s rebel army and of an English officer obnoxious +to their plans. They wanted, or at least Tewfik wanted, a vengeance +on the regiments which had headed the revolt against him in 1881, a +vengeance which had been denied him by the amnesty after +Tel-el-Kebir; while none of them wanted English interference in the +affairs of the Soudan. Be it remembered that Hicks’s soldiers +included Arabi’s own regiment of the Guard, or what was left of it, +and that Omar Lutfi, who had contrived with Tewfik the Alexandria +riots, had sent them to the Soudan in chains. Hicks and his +regiments of old Arabists, we may be quite sure, were ordered +deliberately to their death at Obeid. All Tewfik’s attitude towards +Gordon later was in accordance with this reading of the Hicks +expedition, and it is the only reading that explains what otherwise +would remain an inexplicable act of madness. As to Malet, he was, +in this, as in all else, the Khedive’s too facile dupe, his +unconscious accomplice, just as he had been his dupe in the case of +the Alexandria massacre. He believed what Tewfik told him, and did +not look beyond. Nothing is more remarkable than the easy +indifference displayed by Malet in his published correspondence of +that summer as to all that was going on in the Soudan. Hicks saw +the danger and everybody else saw it. Malet saw nothing or saw only +what the Khedive told him. He did not care to see more.</p> + +<p class="space-above15">An additional proof of this, if any be +needed besides that of the Blue Books, is supplied to me, though a +negative one only, by my own talk with Baring at Cairo in +September, and the record of it already given. I remember that in +it, though our<span class="pagenum" id="Page_84">[84]</span> +discussion ranged over the whole field of his Egyptian +difficulties, he did not so much as allude to the Soudan as being +one of those he had immediately to face—a remarkable omission when +it is considered that he had just been spending ten days with Malet +at his elbow, who must have had full time to bring his knowledge of +every branch of the Egyptian question up to date. Like Malet, Lord +Cromer’s lack of foresight during the whole of the first two months +of his arrival is most noticeable in the Blue Books. These show +that his sole anxiety in those last months before the storm broke +in the Soudan was the financial difficulty. His only reference to +danger in that quarter is where he records a conversation on 26th +October with an unnamed gentleman, who described the finance of the +Soudan to him as “<em>un trou inconnu</em>.” Of other than the +financial danger there is not a word. In his “Modern Egypt,” Cromer +excuses himself from all responsibility in regard to Hicks, by +saying that Hicks had already started on his campaign three days +before his, Cromer’s, arrival. But this is not strictly true.</p> + +<p>Hicks, though he left Khartoum on the 8th September, remained on +in camp on the Nile bank at Duem till the 26th, and could have been +still recalled by telegraph had Cromer so insisted. What is true is +that Cromer did not foresee the consequences, as Malet did not +foresee them. Otherwise how is it possible to account for the +optimism of his dispatch of 6th October, where, in complete +ignorance of the perils threatening the restored regime, he wrote +his confident dispatch reporting that order having been now +completely restored “the British garrison of Cairo might with +safety be withdrawn”? A small force of 3,000 men, to be retained at +Alexandria not as an army any longer of occupation but of +observation<span class="pagenum" id="Page_85">[85]</span> only, +would, he assured Lord Granville, be “amply sufficient to maintain +the honour of Her Majesty’s arms against any force that it may be +supposed with any degree of probability it may have to encounter.” +I, as a stranger spending a week at Cairo, had found out more than +this; and Granville had hardly agreed to the evacuation before the +storm broke, and it was already too late to apply any remedy short +of the dispatch to Khartoum of a British army.</p> + +<p>To bring my narrative back to the historical date at which I +left it. The rapid sequence of events was startling. On the 1st +November news reached Cairo that Captain Moncrieff, British Consul +at Suakin, with 500 Egyptian troops in garrison there, having gone +forth to give battle to the rebels at Tokar on the Red Sea +littoral, had been surprised and slain. On the 19th November the +first rumour of Hicks’s defeat was received, and two days later, +the 21st, knowledge came of the full disaster. The whole of the +Soudan west and south of Khartoum was reported to be in +insurrection, as well as the Eastern provinces; and Colonel +Coetlogon, the English officer left by Hicks in charge of the +Khartoum garrison, was telegraphing that Khartoum itself could not +be held “unless immediately succoured.” All then was for some weeks +in confusion at the Cairo War Office, and hardly less in London. +Cromer, on the very first news, one can hardly say otherwise than +in a panic, had advised the abandonment of the whole Soudan, and by +return of telegraph Lord Granville had agreed, and the necessary +order of evacuation had been given to the Egyptian Government. Some +more weeks had then been wasted in distracted counsels, and, on the +14th January 1884, Gordon was dispatched on his mission to +Khartoum. It was in this brief order that<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_86">[86]</span> I learned the events while travelling in +India, and that the news about Gordon reached me at Delhi. It was +then that I wrote him that too prophetic letter, the text of which +is given in my “India under Ripon,” warning him of the treachery of +those who were sending him on his mission and foretelling his +defeat and death. For the convenience of my present readers, I +reprint it here in the <a href="#Page_534">Appendix.</a></p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_87">[87]</span><a id= +"c03"></a>CHAPTER III</h2> + +<p class="sch1">GORDON’S WORK ON THE WHITE NILE</p> + +<p class="dcap">AND here, before I go further, it will, I think, +make matters still clearer in regard to the history of the next +twelve months in Egypt, including, as it must, Gordon’s heroic +defence of Khartoum, if I break off my personal narrative and +devote a chapter or two to a critical examination of that truly +wonderful man’s character. I propose to do so not in the spirit of +mere hero-worship, though I hold him to have been by far the most +chivalric figure among Englishmen of our generation; and still less +of belittlement; but in the spirit of a sane historian, +reconstructing from the many records we have of his inner spiritual +life no less than of his public actions, and from some sources, +too, of private knowledge and my own recollection of him, a picture +of the living man he was.</p> + +<p>To appreciate Gordon’s character at all accurately, and thereby +to judge his career at its true value, it is essential to recognize +him as a man of many contradictions and a singularly complex +character. He himself, in one of those intimate letters which +through life he was in the habit of writing to his sister, and +which form the most complete self-revelation made in any letters +that have been published in our time, says: “Talk of two natures in +one! I have a hundred, and none think alike and all want to rule”; +and, again: “No man in the world is more changeable than I”—an +exaggeration of the truth yet no less strictly true. Gordon had at +least two distinctly antagonistic features in his nature—the one, +that of a man of action, with an imperative need of +strong<span class="pagenum" id="Page_88">[88]</span> practical +work, the instinct of a soldier who saw the thing he had it in his +mind to do with absolute clearness of vision, and as clearly the +way to do it—the other, that of a religious mystic, occupied not +with this world but with spiritual forces in a world unseen; +perplexed perpetually, and perpetually in doubt as to the precise +will of God with him, a fatalist, a disbeliever in his own free +will, and consequently liable to sudden changes of plan; a seeker +of omens and supernatural directions; at times (as he also himself +says) a “religious fanatic,” perhaps hardly on this one point sane. +Not that Gordon was in the smallest degree a fanatic in the sense +of one who hated another for his creed. His mind was large on this +as on all other matters; but he was imbued with the belief in God’s +direct dealings with man and with his own interpretation of them, +as suited to his own spiritual and temporal case, and with the +nothingness of worldly affairs or of life and death for himself and +others in view of a life to come.</p> + +<p>Entering the army early he saw service for the first time at the +siege of Sebastopol, and remained on in Turkey when the war was +over as one of the officers on the Commission of frontier +delimitation in Bessarabia and Armenia. This gave him his first +experience of the Mohammedan East. In 1860 he joined the British +forces in China, where he took part in the capture of Pekin, and +again stayed on, specially employed. Shanghai, one of the Treaty +Ports, was just then threatened by the Taiping rebellion, and for +its protection an Imperial Chinese force had been raised under +European officers, and the command of it was given to Gordon. With +the permission of his superiors he thus entered a foreign service, +and found himself, at the early age of twenty-nine, commanding an +army of Asiatics under the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_89">[89]</span> Chinese Emperor. His military authority was +practically absolute, and by a display of strategy of the highest +order and lavish personal courage he succeeded in breaking the +Taiping rebellion, and restoring one of the richest provinces of +China and some of its most populous cities to the Imperial +Government. The Emperor, in gratitude for so great a service, +loaded him with honours, and would have enriched him if Gordon had +been willing. But with a fine contempt for wealth he would take +nothing but his stipulated pay, and, the work done, returned to his +ordinary duties in England without further remark or claim on his +own Government.</p> + +<p>This stamps him as a man entirely above the rank of the common +soldier of fortune. That he was also a man of immense natural +military genius cannot be doubted, with a power of exerting +influence over the soldiers he commanded, and turning the rawest +material into good fighting stuff, and in this he compares +favourably with any of the great European leaders of Asiatics that +can be named in history. It is by no means certain, however, to my +mind that in this first brilliant episode of Gordon’s life, any +more than in his latest at Khartoum, he was fighting on what I +should consider the right side, the side that is of those who had +the better right in justice. Indeed the Taipings, though the +methods of their insurrection were barbarous in the extreme, +represented what was more probably the juster cause of the Chinese +people than that of the Man Chu Emperors, in whose service Gordon +was. Gordon, however, did not often stop to consider points like +these when he accepted foreign employment, and only discovered his +mistake when it was too late to retire from it. This was the case +with him, as he found to his cost, when serving the Khedive Ismaïl, +and so, too, he<span class="pagenum" id="Page_90">[90]</span> +discovered and would have avowed it if he had survived his last +campaign against the Mahdi. What is important about the Chinese +episode is the strong effect it had upon his character. The +terrible sights which he there witnessed in the lands laid waste by +the Taipings, the appalling incidents of an Eastern civil war, the +cruelties inflicted on the weak, the outraged women and the +starving children, famine, pestilence, and death spread over +immensely populous areas, joined with the almost miraculous +victories achieved by the army he commanded, the huge personal +risks daily run, and his unvarying success, bred in him a +conviction that he was under immediate divine direction, and had +for his special mission in life the redressing of wrongs and the +protection of the helpless. His attitude thenceforth, though he +made mistakes, was that of the Christian knight errant, seeking +service through the world wherever there were dragons of iniquity +to fight, or distressed persons to be rescued by feats of arms. It +is necessary to remember this if we are to understand rightly the +spirit of his early Egyptian service.</p> + +<p>For a while, however, Gordon’s humanitarian impulse was to be +turned into more peaceful channels. In 1865 he returned to England +and was given a command at Gravesend with the engineering task of +fortifying the entrance to the Thames. Here he had much spare time, +and devoted it to works of mercy among the poor, especially to the +rescuing of the waifs and strays of the London streets, boys for +whom he found employment, and whom he befriended with money and +advice. Gordon had, from his youth up, been deeply religious. He +belonged to no church or sect, unless it were that of what is +called Bible Christianity, a form of belief based solely on the +Old<span class="pagenum" id="Page_91">[91]</span> and New +Testaments as interpreted, each man, by the light of his own +spiritual conscience. He owed this to his mother. It is a little +difficult, now in the twentieth century, when the higher criticism +has permeated all theology and when science has accepted evolution +as its recognized basis, to realize how at the beginning of Queen +Victoria’s reign the great body of educated Englishmen were brought +up to believe with an implicit faith in the text of the authorized +English version of the Holy Scriptures as the literal word of God +containing all direction needed for the spiritual wants of man. +This was specially the case in the middle rank of society, that of +Gordon’s mother, which for the most part had nonconformist +traditions and had remained equally unaffected by the scepticism of +the eighteenth century and by the Oxford Church movement of the +nineteenth in the direction of authority. Nor was it till some +years after Gordon’s education was over, and he was well launched +on his military career, that the publication of Darwin’s “Origin of +Species” prevailed at last in dissociating scientific training from +the simpler English creeds.</p> + +<p>Gordon therefore carried with him untouched into his active life +the Biblical foundation of his childhood. He held the text of +Scripture from the first verse of Genesis to the last of +Revelations to be God’s written word, and that it was given to +every man by faith and prayer and constant study to find in it all +necessary direction both for his temporal and his eternal needs. He +spent a certain portion of every day in studying the Book, and, +being of a logical mind, in seeking counsel in its pages for each +morrow as it came. His certainty that the text was inspired induced +him by a further logic to believe that, relying on it, he, too, was +inspired. This is the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_92">[92]</span> +real key to much that otherwise would be inexplicable in his public +career.</p> + +<p>In his moral life Gordon stood on the highest possible plane. +Apart from a few boyish escapades at school—and he was all his life +high-spirited—there is no record of his ever having transgressed +the straitest rules of exemplary conduct. He seems never to have +been in love, or to have indulged even for a moment in any dream of +earthly happiness to be found in domestic joys. These he regarded +as not intended for him, and he was as far from the thought of +marriage as though he had renounced the possibility of it by vow. +“What a blessing,” he exclaims in one of his letters to his sister, +“one was never married! Marriage spoils human beings.” Even the +sentimental regard in which many women held him was distasteful to +him. “What I dislike,” he says, “in ——’s letters is the sentimental +part; it is to me quite painful; she is so impressive. I do hope +you will try and quiet her. I am torn in two with the wish not to +be unkind, and yet I wish her not to bother me.” That was his +general attitude toward women other than the old and helpless. Dr. +Barnes, who was in some measure Gordon’s spiritual adviser in the +last five years of his life, says of him: “Gordon was much less at +ease in talking to women than in talking to men. While conversing +with women he seemed to exercise even more than his usual +self-control in the expression of his thought and feeling. His +sympathy, geniality, and attractiveness became as it were veiled, +and he was ‘himself again’ only when the restraint was removed. He +was seen at his best in the society of young children, his keen +interest for whom had not been dulled either by solitude or by the +necessity—which had often been imposed on him in other +relations—for strictly-guarded<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_93">[93]</span> intercourse. With children he was quite at +home.”</p> + +<p>In all things he was abstemious. Even the poor pleasures of the +table were generally denied. He hated feasts and entertainments, +and at Greenwich allowed his uncomfortable meals to be freely +interrupted by any caller on however trifling a business. “His +meals,” says his brother of him, “were of the most frugal kind, and +his arrangements were such that no one was ever prevented seeing +him in consequence of his being engaged at any of them, for he had +a table with a deep drawer in which when drawn out, the food was +deposited, and so if any one came the drawer was shut and there +were no signs that he had been engaged otherwise than at his +ordinary work.” In his evenings, instead of enjoying rest or talk, +he would go out to ragged schools or on some other work of mercy. +His money he would give away as long as he had any available, and +he would even borrow to give, this not in small driblets, but in +considerable sums of £50 and £100 and £200 at a time. On himself he +would spend nothing. Speaking to Sir Rivers Wilson about him in +1878, the Catholic Bishop of Khartoum explained the wonderful +influence he then enjoyed among the Soudanese as due to his +alms-giving and his chastity. It astonished all men that he should +care nothing for the two things those in power mostly indulged in, +the love of money and the love of women. In all this Gordon was a +saint.</p> + +<p>Seven years of his life were passed in this way at Gravesend, +and there grew up around him a little band of religious admirers +which gradually made for him a name in the English humanitarian +world. He was willing always to talk on the things of the spirit +with the spiritually-minded, and to write to those<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_94">[94]</span> who sought his opinion or +counsel by letter, whether it was on a public or a private matter. +It was with the poor and unimportant that he preferred to +correspond rather than with those in high places, though among +these also he had friends. Thus on a foundation of general esteem +gradually acquired, the power came to him which he was to wield in +public affairs, and was steadily built up. His worth in his own +profession was acknowledged, for he had done mighty deeds in +war,—that could not be denied, though by many of his fellow +soldiers he was accounted “insubordinate,” by others mad. It seemed +enough to them to prove his insanity that he did not ask promotions +or rewards and that he was careless of his pay.</p> + +<p>The only failing I can really find in him—for that of drink with +which he has been charged was not a serious one—was a certain +tendency to court publicity, which he himself acknowledged as a +snare to his generally humble attitude. His sister seems at one +time to have pointed this out to him, and his reply shows that he +felt her reproach as true. “Newspapers,” he says in answer to her, +“feed a passion I have for giving my opinion . . . You drew a bow +at a venture with your full strength and you have done for your +brother; the arrow has gone in up to its feathers! He that speaketh +of himself seeketh his own glory! Why, you have knocked down the +work of years; what have I ever been talking of but self? . . . I +have a sort of wish that I could get rid of <em>Colonel +Gordon</em>.” He called this craving for publicity “Agag; a +catering for notice and praise; hailing the tram of the world!” a +thing which must be “hewn in pieces before the Lord”—and yet he +yields over and over again to it, while he torments himself for his +weakness,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_95">[95]</span> a point in +his character which he shares with many saints who have been +canonized by popular acclaim, and which must not be missed, for it, +too, explains much.</p> + +<p class="space-above15">Such was Gordon at the time of his first +entrance on the Egyptian scene in 1874, and it is with the Egyptian +period only of his life that we need concern ourselves in any +detail. His connection with the Khedivial service came about in +this way. In 1871 he was sent on special service once more to +Turkey, and finding himself at Constantinople in connection with +the Danube commission, to which he had been appointed, it chanced +that he met Nubar Pasha at the English Embassy and had a talk with +him, which determined his after life. The Egyptian Government was +in search of an engineer officer who would undertake, in succession +to Sir Samuel Baker, the administration of the Equatorial Province +of the Upper Nile, and Nubar consulted him as to the securing of +such an officer; and this led a year later to Gordon’s agreeing to +go there himself as the Khedive Ismaïl’s servant. What tempted him +to the work was, I think, a certain natural restlessness and a +desire for useful professional employment. English military life at +home, with its constant round of unreal duties and of social +inanities, was thoroughly distasteful to him, and the freedom of an +independent command abroad in however wild a region was always +preferred by him to ordinary employment at home. Also he had become +interested in the suppression of the slave trade on the Nile and +Congo, which was being much discussed at the time, and this was +probably what decided him. Be this as it may, he visited Cairo on +his way back from the Danube in 1873 and, having received +permission from the War Office in London,<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_96">[96]</span> was named Governor of the Equatorial Province +at the beginning of the following year, his instructions on leaving +Cairo for the seat of his new government at Gondokoro being to open +a trade route by river to the Equatorial Lakes, to establish the +Khedive’s authority on these to the Nile sources, and also to put a +stop to the slave raiding in the upper provinces, which had become +a scandal in Europe, and was injuring the Khedive’s credit. +Gordon’s idea at starting on his mission was that the first half of +his instructions would, when accomplished, bring about the second +half. “Open out the country,” he says in one of his letters of the +time, “and it [the slave trade] will fall of itself.” It was the +general idea held by English humanitarians of the day, but one +which Gordon found reason to distrust later.</p> + +<p>There are two ways of looking at this question. The slave +raiding which prevailed along the whole border line between +Equatorial Africa and the waterless northern deserts which extend +from the White Nile to the Atlantic had for many centuries been a +terrible scourge upon the indigenous black race. It was carried on +by the Bedouin tribes, more or less Arab in their origin and +Mohammedan in their religion, who had invaded and conquered North +Africa in the early centuries of Islam. These considered the Pagan +negroes their lawful booty wherever they could capture them, and +made a trade of bringing them with other equatorial produce to the +sea coasts of Morocco and the rest of the Mohammedan States +bordering the Mediterranean and Red Seas. It was a yearly tithe of +many thousands taken from the unwarlike agricultural villagers, and +may justly be likened to the depredation inflicted on the antelope +herds of the same borderland by lions living on the desert +outskirts. At first sight, and from a<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_97">[97]</span> humanitarian point of view, it would seem +that the destruction of these human lions was the beneficent duty +of any one who would undertake it, and the extirpation of the slave +raiders by force of arms the surest way of bringing prosperity to +the negro inhabitants. And such was the view taken by most of our +European explorers of the nineteenth century, Schweinfurth, Baker, +Stanley, and the rest, who were in correspondence with the +anti-slavery association in London and were constantly urging the +duty of the penetration and civilizing of Central Africa by the +states of Europe. Africa once Europeanized, they argued, +slave-raiding must necessarily be made to cease and the negroes be +freed from an immemorial misfortune. The reasoning harmonized well +with the commercial ideas of the day, which saw in Central Africa +new fields for its enterprise; and the civilized occupation of the +two lines of waterway by which the Soudan could most easily be +reached, the Nile and the Congo, was pushed on by the societies as +a duty of humanity. I remember attending a meeting of the Royal +Geographical Society under Sir Roderick Murchison, to which I had +just been elected in 1862, in which our then Consul Petherick at +Khartoum was praised for his exploration of the White Nile, as yet +an unknown region, on this very ground, that benefit must +necessarily accrue to the negroes from the opening up of their +country through Englishmen acting in conjunction with the Viceroy +of Egypt. Yet this very exploration of Petherick’s turned out to be +the beginning of far worse evils to the negroes of the White Nile +than any they had during all the centuries of their unexplored +history experienced, even to the total destruction of some of their +communities.</p> + +<p>The truth is—and this Gordon came to understand<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_98">[98]</span> at Khartoum, as we to-day are +coming to understand it on the Congo—though European civilization +is able to deal with certain evils incidental to uncivilized life, +it brings with it other evils ten times more destructive than those +it cures. It destroys the lions, but the antelopes are not found +thereby to increase. On the contrary they become a prey, all of +them, to the newcomer, their far more scientific and unsparing +friend. And so it is also with the negroes who are ten times worse +ruined by European conquest. Of the reality of this truth Gordon +gained at least occasional glimpses during the years he served the +Khedive Ismaïl in the Soudan. For myself I have never been in any +doubt, since I have had an opinion at all on the matter, that the +only true humanity towards the negroes of Equatorial Africa would +have been to leave them unvisited, uncivilized, and severely alone +with their own local troubles. The alternative policy to that of +force applied to the slave raiders was that of the encouragement of +Mohammedan reform in the Mediterranean Moslem states, and with it +to secure the abolition of slavery as a legal institution and so +the demand of slaves from the interior. This policy, however, was +never one at all popular with the anti-slave-trade associations. +Our professional humanitarians were no more anxious to abolish +slavery altogether than masters of foxhounds are anxious to abolish +foxes; and Mohammedan reformers were generally discouraged by the +societies and reminded that slavery was recognized by the Koran, +and so could not be legally condemned by any reformers professing +themselves Moslems. This was certainly the case in 1882 when Sheykh +Mohammed Abdu and Arabi included the complete abolition of slavery +in their programme of national<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_99">[99]</span> reform. Sir William Muir and Allen, the +anti-slavery secretary, at once took up the cudgels against them in +the “Times,” and their anger knew no bounds. It was an unheard-of +thing, they said, that a Mohammedan reformer should dare to strike +at the roots of a time-honoured Oriental institution to which their +English society owed its <em>raison d’être</em>.</p> + +<p>Yet the Egyptian reformers of that day were perfectly sincere in +their intention. They were poor men, representing a community too +humble to be slave owning itself, arrayed against a wealthy ruling +class possessed of slaves. Their interests did not warp their +judgement, and their judgement on this, as on other things, was +humanitarian. The Khedive and the Turkish Pashas, however, were +infinitely preferred by Allen and the agents of the society in +Egypt, whose salaries would have ceased had slavery and slave +dealing really disappeared from the Nile. As to our diplomatic +representatives, at Cairo as elsewhere, they hated the worry of the +whole slavery question and resented anything that raised its +abolition in practical form. It meant for them the tiresome duty of +presenting remonstrances to Mohammedan princes who all possessed +slaves and who wished to keep them and not to be deprived of the +means of getting new ones when required. I remember well the +disgust with which dispatches from the Slave Trade department of +the Foreign Office were regarded in our Chancelleries. All the +same, the method of dealing with them as I have just indicated +would have been the true line for our humanitarians to take if the +interests of the raided black villagers of the Upper Nile had been +alone in question. A pronouncement against slavery at Cairo by a +Nationalist Sheykh el Islam, would have been worth more to them +than a whole army of<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_100">[100]</span> civilized protectors sent to guard their +desert frontier against <em>jellabat</em>.</p> + +<p>It will be interesting to give some extracts from Gordon’s +letters to his sister and others bearing on these points, letters +written while in Ismaïl’s service, for they are infinitely +instructive, and as human documents unsurpassed in the political +history of our time. They were begun immediately on his arrival at +Cairo at the beginning of 1874, and continued without interruption +during the whole period of his Soudan service. It must be +remembered that the official world of Cairo of that day represented +a society as pecuniarily corrupt and as destitute of all public +virtue as could well be found upon the face of the globe. The +Khedive Ismaïl, who had all the vices of the East overlaid with a +veneer of Western civilization, plausible, unscrupulous, and +profoundly immoral, had gathered round him a gang of European +speculators whose one object was to extract money from his coffers +by contracts, loans, and services rendered at extravagant rates in +every branch of the administration. Among the highest paid were +those that took service in the Soudan and ministered to Ismaïl’s +ambition of conquering the Upper Nile to its sources, and on the +pretence of putting down the slave trade adding province after +province to his African empire. Gordon’s predecessor as Governor of +the Equatorial Provinces, Sir Samuel Baker, had been paid at the +extravagant rate of £10,000 a year, exclusive of all his expenses, +and had left Egypt at the close of his four years’ engagement with +a solid sum of £40,000 untouched at his banker’s. The arrival +therefore of Gordon with his unself-seeking ways was a wholly +disturbing element for the official mind, and made him enemies from +the beginning not only among his<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_101">[101]</span> fellow Europeans who considered that he was +underselling them in the administrative market, but by the +Turco-Circassian and Armenian Pashas who were amassing large +fortunes in the general reign of extravagance. The allusion made in +one of the first extracts given is to an interview between Gordon +and Sherif Pasha, then Prime Minister, in which there had been a +characteristic misunderstanding between the two, Gordon refusing +the £10,000 salary of his predecessor, and protesting that £2,000 +would be ample, Sherif imagining that his refusal was only the +coyness of a rogue who wanted a still huger sum. It was difficult, +too, for any one at Cairo to understand that Gordon had the +suppression of the slave trade really at heart or that his +acceptance of the mission to the Equatorial Nile would be followed +by any practical result in a humanitarian direction. Ismaïl, as +little as the rest, was sincere in this, but affected a zeal in +suppressing the slave trade, which at first took in the not very +discerning mind of Gordon, who with all his power of managing +Orientals <em>en masse</em> was far from being a good judge of +individual character,<a id="FNanchor_15"></a><a href="#Footnote_15" +class="fnanchor">[15]</a> thinking to gain thereby a prop in +humanitarian England to his failing commercial credit. The process +of Gordon’s undeception both as to Ismaïl and as to the reality of +the good he was doing or could possibly do in the Soudan is to me +the most interesting feature of the letters, and I will give such +extracts from them as seem to bear most directly on this feature of +his character, with others exemplifying the strange +religious<span class="pagenum" id="Page_102">[102]</span> mysticism +which was to play so important a part in the drama of his later +exploits at Khartoum. Incidentally, too, the extracts will explain +much of the official ill-will manifested towards Gordon in 1884 not +only by Nubar and the Court clique of ministerial Pashas, but by +our own English diplomatists at the British Consulate-General, +including Lord Cromer. These are my quotations:</p> + +<p>“I believe if the Soudan was settled the Khedive would prevent +the slave trade; but he does not see his way to do so till he can +move about the country. . . . My object is to show the Khedive and +his people that gold and silver idols are not worshipped by all the +world. They are very powerful gods, but not so powerful as our God; +so if I refuse a large sum you will not be angry at my doing so. +From whom does all the money come? From poor miserable creatures +who are ground down to produce it. Of course these ideas are +outrageous. ‘Pillage the Egyptians’ is still the cry. . . .</p> + +<p>“I remember that God has at all times worked by weak and small +means. All history shows this to be His mode, and so I believe if +He will He may work by me. . . . I paid a visit to Sherif Pasha, +the Minister of Justice, and let him understand that your brother +was not an hireling. I did this rather sharply. . . . I think I can +see the true motive now of the expedition, and believe it to be a +sham, to catch the attention of the English people. As Baker said: +I think the Khedive is quite innocent (or nearly so) of it, but +Nubar is the chief man. Now what has happened? There has been a +mutual disappointment. Nubar thought he had a rash fellow to deal +with, who could be persuaded to cut a dash, etc., etc., and he +found he had one of the Gordon<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_103">[103]</span> race. This latter thought the thing real, +and found it a sham and felt like a Gordon who has been humbugged. +. . . Though I do not credit myself with anything, it cannot be +denied but that your brother’s conduct [in wishing to cut down +expenses] is a silent reproach to the usual mode of doing things in +this country and is the more cutting from its silence. It is Greek +and Hebrew to them to reason that all the coin one takes is wrung +out of poor people. . . . Nubar and your brother do not hit it off, +and the other evening So-and-so said foolishly, ‘Do not make an +enemy of Nubar. He will or may do you mischief.’ It was too much, +and your brother replied, in the midst of a circle of guests, that +there was no one living who could do him the slightest injury which +he could feel, and that he would not shape his face to suit any one +beyond acting loyally. . . . I think they think me very queer, and +I am, I dare say. . . . You have no idea of the intrigues here; it +is a regular hot bed, and things cannot last long like this. They +are paying 36 per cent. for money. . . . I think the Khedive likes +me, but no one else does; and I do not like them—I mean the swells +whose corns I tread on in all manner of ways. I saw so and so at +Suez. He agrees with me in our opinion of the rottenness of Egypt: +it is all for the flesh, and in no place is human nature to be +studied with such advantage. Duke of This wants steamer—say £600. +Duke of That wants house, etc. All the time the poor people are +ground down to get money for all this. Who art thou to be afraid of +a man? If He wills, I will shake all this in some way not clear to +me now. Do not think I am an egoist. I am like Moses who despised +the riches of Egypt. We have a king mightier than these, and more +enduring riches and power in Him<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_104">[104]</span> than we can have in this world. I will not +bow to Haman.”<a id="FNanchor_16"></a><a href="#Footnote_16" class= +"fnanchor">[16]</a></p> + +<p>Arrived at the seat of his labours and engaged in the work set +him by the Khedive of opening up the White Nile to the Equatorial +Lakes, we find him speedily disgusted with the methods in use for +the spreading of civilization in those remote regions, the petty +warfare waged by the troops he was given to command against the +primitive negro tribes which were living happily without him, and +whose only wish was to be left alone. Baker had been brutal with +these poor blacks; Gordon’s heart went out towards them. He +speedily saw the fallacy of the pretence that he was sent there to +do them good.</p> + +<p>“They (the native blacks) have had no communication with the +world. They would seem to get on well without any regular laws and +to live out their span in comparative quiet. . . . No country +presents such a field for a philosopher as this country does with +its dense population quite innocent of the least civilization. I +should say that they are singularly free from vice; their wars are +generally very harmless affairs and seldom cause bloodshed. . . . +Is it not remarkable that you never find anything like ambition in +a native sheikh? They will readily agree to plunder their +neighbour, but would never think of annexing his tribe to theirs. . +. . They are in tribes of 100 or 300 families, and I expect have +been so for ages. . . . The natives suffered in their attack to-day +and I do not think they will trouble us again. . . . If they are to +be put down it<span class="pagenum" id="Page_105">[105]</span> is +better I should do it than an exterminating pasha who would have no +mercy. . . . I wish the whole of this business was over. I do not +want to hurt these people, but we must defend ourselves.” And +later, a detachment of his soldiers having been surprised by the +blacks and destroyed: “We derided the poor blacks who fought for +their independence, and now God gave them the victory. I declare, +in spite of the expressions you may note in my letters, I truly +sympathize with them. They say, ‘We do not want your cloth and +beads; you go your way and we will go ours; we do not want to see +your chief. . . . This land is ours, and you shall not have it, +neither its bread nor its flocks.’ Poor fellows! You will say I am +most inconsistent, and so I am, and so are you. We are dead against +our words when it comes to action. . . . I have a number of +Niam-Niam soldiers. . . . The Niam-Niam warriors are fearful +objects; they do look very fierce. They are thick set, sturdy +fellows, and they look brave and fearless. I declare it is rather a +trial to me to set them on the satin-skinned Baris, but these +latter will not leave me alone. . . . Did I not mention the +incantations made against us by the magicians on the other side, +and how somehow, from the earnestness that they made them with, I +had some thought of misgiving on account of them? It were odd their +repulse was so soon to follow. These prayers were earnest prayers +for celestial aid in which the prayer knew he would need help from +some unknown power to avert a danger. That the native knows not the +true God is true, but God knows him and moved him to pray and +answered his prayer. ‘The horse is prepared for the day of battle, +but the victory is of the Lord.’ . . . The tax-gatherers are out +and there is immense excitement among the natives on the other +side. Six<span class="pagenum" id="Page_106">[106]</span> or seven +hundred are collected on the hill tops. . . . We cannot see what +the tax-gatherers are doing. . . . The taxes are in sight . . . 200 +cows and 1,500 sheep. . . . The daughter of the Sheykh was taken: I +have now sent to him to say if he will submit I will leave him +alone and that he is to come for his daughter. I hope sincerely to +make friends with him and end this miserable work, for it is just +that.</p> + +<p>“I wish they would submit now and save any more of these wars or +rather miserable cattle raids; but it is no use wishing—you must +take their cows, otherwise they will never give in. . . . To-day on +a bare rock a mile off stood a man with two attendants. He held his +hands clasped together at the back of his head, and turned to all +quarters, putting them down sometimes straight to his sides. I +watched him with my glass. ‘Come, curse me this people: for they +are too mighty for me.’ I can quite enter into these poor people’s +misery at their impotency. ‘We do not want beads. We do not want +the Pasha. . . . We want our own lands and you to go away.’ Their +poor minds never conceived such a trial as this before. Rain was +their only care, now <em>civilization</em> (?) is to begin with +them. They are to be brought into the family of nations. . . . +There are a great number of natives on Balak’s hill to-day. . . . +Balaam is there with his hands in the same position; the kings and +princes of Midian are sitting like apes behind him. . . . How I +hate this country and all the work. . . . I am thoroughly +disgusted. These (the Khedive’s) people are unfit to acquire the +country . . . incapable of civilizing the natives. . . . They are +conies, a feeble race. . . . I cannot help it, but I have taken +such a dislike to these blacks that I cannot bear their sight. I do +not mean the natives, but these soldiers. They are nothing but a +set of pillagers,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_107">[107]</span> +and are about as likely to civilize these parts as to civilize the +moon. Though it tells against my operations, I am glad in my heart +that they are afraid of the natives. God permits me to open the +road to the interior, but, humanly speaking, I see nothing to +encourage the hope that this occupation of their lands will be of +any advantage towards civilizing them. In excuse for taking this +employ I can only say that I think I have accomplished a work with +the nearly minimum amount of suffering to natives and soldiery +which would have been done by an Arab Pasha with a great amount of +suffering to soldiery and natives. . . . Some philanthropic people +write to me about ‘noble work,’ ‘poor blacks,’ etc. I have I think +stopped their writings by acknowledging ourselves to be a pillaging +horde of brigands.”</p> + +<p>Such, as seen in these intimate letters, was Gordon’s own +opinion of his work down to the end of his two years as Governor of +the Equator. He reconciled it to his conscience only by the +reflection that, if another had been entrusted with it than +himself, the injury inflicted on the negro tribes would have been +greater than it was.</p> + +<p>At this time, October 1876, he was so little in love with his +exhausting and thankless work, and in so great despair of doing +real good in the Soudan, that he resolved to throw it up. “I want +to see my way clear first,” he writes. “Comfort of the body, a very +strong gentleman says, ‘What is the use of opening more country to +such a Government? There is more now under their power than they +can ever manage. Retire now.’ But Mr. (I do not know what) says, +‘Shut your eyes to what may happen in future; leave that to God, +and do what you think will open the country thoroughly to both +lakes. Do this not for His Highness or for his +Government,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_108">[108]</span> but do +it blindly and in faith.’” And a few days later, “To-day Reason +says strongly, ‘Do not stay and aid such a Government.’ But I do +not like to be beaten, which I am if I retire; and by retiring I do +not remedy anything. By staying I keep my province safe from +injustice and cruelty in some degree. . . . When a house gives +ominous cracks prior to a fall one’s desire is—the rule in ships—to +leave it. . . . But I do not like the idea, even if the cracks are +serious. Why should I fear? Is man more strong than God? Things +have come to such a pass in these Mussulman countries that a crisis +must come about soon.”</p> + +<p>He had come, too, to persuade himself that he was an instrument +in God’s hands for purposes, obscure at present, but ultimately to +be made manifest, which would more than counterbalance the +immediate evil. The idea recurs perpetually in his letters, joined +with that of a fatalism as absolute as that of any Moslem. Indeed, +it is evident that the long years spent with none but Moslems on +the Upper Nile, where he was cut off from all communication with +men of his own Christian creed, heightened, if it did not initiate, +the predestinarian tone of his religious thought. It is a point in +his character of the highest importance if we are to understand his +action when later he was called upon to rescue the Soudan +garrisons. It seems to have grown upon him that he was one +pre-ordained to do God’s work as was Joshua when leading the armies +of Israel as conquerors into the promised land. The uncompromising +logic of his mind made him accept this inference from results, and +he refused to acknowledge that the same faith which had inspired +Joshua and Moses to deeds that were miraculous should be lacking to +his own as absolute faith. All<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_109">[109]</span> were but instruments in the hands of the +same God—all were under equal direction. It will be worth while to +collect the passages in his letters which most clearly illustrate +this belief, a belief founded on Bible teaching, and intensified in +the Soudan by the solitude in which he lived. What the Koran was to +his Moslem companions, that the Bible was to him, with the Islamic +doctrine of submission to God’s providence for good and for evil, +the fatalism which believes in all things as pre-ordained. Each +year spent in the Soudan added to the illusion of his divine +instrumentality, especially in the suppression of the slave trade, +which signalized the second period of his work when he had become +Governor-General, a position to which he was promoted in 1877.</p> + +<p>“Has it ever struck you,” he writes from Kordofan to his sister, +“that if man’s birth and death are predetermined by God to happen +at certain epochs, so every intervening event must be also +predetermined? Few are atheistical enough to say either man’s birth +or death are things of chance; and how can they therefore dispute +that the intervening events are not preordained. In governing these +countries I wish I could realize this truth more than I do. . . . +The more I live in this country and the more God prospers me, the +more I despise myself and feel despicable; some of the +<em>coups</em> I have made, and which have been successful, have +been such flukes, or chances, as the world calls them, as to +astonish me quite as much as they have astonished others, and I +cannot feed myself with the thought of ‘How clever I am,’ for +impressed on my mind is the fact, ‘You know you had no idea of what +would happen on your so acting.’ . . . I have really no troops with +me, but I have the Shekinah (the Lord)<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_110">[110]</span> and I do like trusting to Him and not to +man. . . . Had I not got this Almighty Power to back me, with His +infinite wisdom, I do not know how I could even think of what is to +be done. . . . I do not believe in man’s free will; therefore, if +my actions are right they are His actions; if evil, they are the +inevitable produce of the corrupt body in which I am placed by Him. +. . . Those who hold by man’s free will must consequently be more +or less elated if they do well. Now, if you accepted what I think +the truth, namely, that man has no free will, you would never be +elated, for you would not arrogate to yourself your actions; +neither would you be depressed by your evil acts. . . . I own I +feared to trust God in this slave dealer’s business; I was tossed +up and down. Perhaps physical fatigue may have been the cause. I +hold to ‘Trust in the Lord and lean not on thine own +understanding.’ And He has brought me through. . . . You and I are +flies on the wheel; try and realize this, that you do not move the +wheel. . . . All this points to the absolute rule God has over +events, good or evil. As I said before ‘Be a fool’ in the world’s +language.”</p> + +<p>And again: “I wonder if I look ambitious in your eyes. Do you +think I sought this place? You should know more than most people, +for you have all my thoughts in my letters. Judging myself, I fear +it was so when I took the work in hand; not that I cared for the +money or the honours to come from it. I think, however, my main +idea was a quixotic one—to help the Khedive, mixed with the feeling +that I could with God’s direction accomplish this work. . . . If +God puts ten pounds on a man He will give him strength to bear +twenty pounds. And if He puts twenty tons on a man He will (if He +wills) give him power to carry sixty tons. This He has +done<span class="pagenum" id="Page_111">[111]</span> for me; and I +in saying this do not seek the praise of any man or society, or +king or power. I would have your prayers—they will be heard—but no +praise, for He is the <span class="sc">Governor-General</span>, and +I am only His useless agent, by whom He deigns to work His will. . +. . I feel I am only a straw, yet God gave the men in Darfour +courage under me. I cannot look back or forward to ever having done +or to ever doing anything worthy of commendation. . . . I do not +and cannot chew the cud of self-complacency. . . . I no more +believe in the foresight of Napoleon or the Duke. People made out +their talent as foresight after the thing was done. God gives the +thought, man carries it out, for the thought is given so strongly +as to force him to act thus.”</p> + +<p>“I am now, thank God, so far from the least thought of man’s +free will that it never enters into my calculation in these +thoughts, however it may guide me as Governor-General or as +fellow-man. . . . I feel so strongly that death is not an evil to +man that, if I thought the shooting of any number of slave dealers +would be of avail in stopping the slave trade, I would shoot them +without the least compunction, though if a slave dealer was ill and +it was in my power to cure him I would do my best to do so. . . . I +believe entirely in the Old and New Testaments as being inspired by +God. . . . I base my belief on the Scripture entirely; it is there +distinctly laid down that God rules all things. . . . To accept the +doctrine of man having no free will we must acknowledge his utter +insignificance. For my part I can give myself no credit for +anything I ever did; and further I credit no man with talents, +etc., etc., in anything he may have done. Napoleon, Luther—indeed, +all men—I consider were directly worked on and directed to work out +God’s great<span class="pagenum" id="Page_112">[112]</span> scheme. +Everything that happens to-day, good or evil, is settled and fixed. +. . . No comfort is equal to that which he has who has God for his +stay, but believes, not in words but in fact, that all things are +ordained to happen and must happen.”</p> + +<p>Again, when worn out with work and loneliness: “Long before you +get this I shall be out of my troubles; so do not pity me, for I +have the Almighty to guide me and death is no terror. I only wish +you to know how worn I am through having to lean on <span class= +"sc">God alone</span>. It seems odd but it is diametrically opposed +to our flesh to do so, and it is very trying. My flesh says, ‘I +should like 1,000 good, trustworthy soldiers, and not His promise.’ +It is utterly wrong, but a widow would prefer £15,000 in the 3 per +cent. consols to the promise that God will provide for her. After +my spirit I prefer the promise; after my flesh I prefer the 1,000 +soldiers; not having them my spirit lords it over my flesh and +conquers; but the flesh suffers all the same, and I see the deep +lines in my face getting deeper and deeper day by day. <em>Why did +you go?</em> Well, He sent me, for I went on a toss up. He is the +<span class="sc">Governor-General</span>, I am only His agent.”</p> + +<p>All these are passages from Gordon’s letters written to his +sister during his service under the Khedive Ismaïl between 1874 and +1879. They explain the man. With regard to its results from a +humanitarian point of view he was, as I have said, conscious of +failure, even when his friends in England were loudest in their +praise of his success. He knew it had no permanence.</p> + +<p>The work indeed that he had undertaken was one which could not +be achieved under the circumstances which then ruled the Soudan. At +Khartoum and throughout the whole country slavery<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_113">[113]</span> was the recognized basis of +social and industrial life. The slave was as much property as the +ox or the sheep, and though his lot was less hard than it had been +in Christian lands a few decades before—for the slave was not put +to field labour, as in the West Indies, and was admitted to a +certain filial position in the household of his master—the thought +of his having any natural right to freedom had not yet penetrated +the humanest local brain. The Egyptian officials at Khartoum were, +as a rule, the very worst section of their class, men exiled for +their misdemeanours from the lower Nile, while the army was, to a +large extent, recruited from convicted criminals. The native +Soudanese of Arab origin were wholly disaffected to the Government, +and many of them, driven from their homes by its exactions, had +formed themselves into bands of robber slave hunters, and were in +revolt against it. No real help was to be had from Cairo. Gordon +had some nine or ten Europeans with him in all, scattered through +the country, and the Christian population of Khartoum, mostly +Greeks, were hardly less interested in the slave trade than their +Moslem neighbours, many of them being themselves slave owners. +There were a few Catholic missionaries, and a bishop, but they +exercised little influence, and Gordon, as an Englishman determined +to stop the trade, was practically alone. The Soudan was an immense +territory with no natural frontiers, few means of communication, +and a population of several warlike millions, unamalgamated except +by the tie of a somewhat fanatical anti-Christian creed. He thus +describes the western regions, where the raids were chiefly +organized: “These countries are very curious; they seem to be +peopled with huge tribes of Bedouin Arabs, with a small nucleus of +more settled people<span class="pagenum" id="Page_114">[114]</span> +who congregate in the larger villages. . . . Some of them can put +from 2,000 to 6,000 horse or camel men into the field. . . . Now +these tribes raid on the negro tribes to the south, or else +exchange cloth for slaves with the Bedouin tribes beyond even the +pretended boundary of Egypt. . . . The tribes sell the slaves to +the little merchants, <em>jellabat</em>, of all kinds, who flock +into these lands. The merchants, who come from all parts of Egypt, +then come down to the more populous places . . . and sell them to +others. Even with the British Government in possession, I do not +know how this slave trade could be stopped.”</p> + +<p>Nevertheless, as a soldier, and he was a dogged one, Gordon +fought on, though conscious of its being morally a losing battle. +As a soldier he was successful and accomplished the work given him +of subduing the revolted slave dealers; though the slave trade +itself he could not stop, much less slavery in the Soudan. The +caravans were too intangible on the open western frontier, and he +had no means of setting the recaptured slaves at liberty. In order +at all to deal with the case he was obliged himself to purchase +slaves, for which he accuses himself thus to imaginary +humanitarians sitting in their easy chairs at home: “The slaves I +buy are already torn from their homes, and whether I buy them or +not they will remain slaves. . . . It is not as if I encouraged +raids for the purpose of getting slaves as soldiers. But people +will say, ‘By buying slaves you increase the demand and indirectly +encourage raids.’ I say, ‘Yes, I should do so, if after buying them +I still allowed the raids to continue.’ . . . This slave question +is most troublesome and difficult to manage. A number of slaves +taken in the last raid made near here (in Darfour) refuse to go +back, for they find they are better fed with their new masters than +they<span class="pagenum" id="Page_115">[115]</span> were with the +old. . . . Darfour is a regular cockpit. One thing troubles me. +What am I to do with the two or three thousand slaves that are now +at Shaka, if we take it? I cannot take them back into their own +country; I cannot feed them. Solve this problem for me. I must let +them be taken by my auxiliaries, or by my soldiers, or by the +merchants. There is no help for it. If I let them loose they will +be picked up in every direction, for an escaped slave is like an +escaped sheep, the property of him who finds him or her. . . . If I +let the slaves be taken by my soldiers, by the tribes, or by the +merchants, instead of there being a cessation of the slave caravans +there will be a great increase of them for two or three months and +a corresponding outcry against me. But at any rate the slaves will +go by frequented routes and will not die on the road. . . . Shall I +be cowardly for fear of what ill-informed Europe may say?”</p> + +<p>This was written in the early days of his Darfour campaign. As +it proceeded, the horrors of the midsummer warfare in a waterless +wilderness oppressed him as a nightmare, the necessity of reducing +all, tribes, slave raiders, and slaves alike, by thirst and hunger, +seizing the wells and the hidden supplies of corn. “The men find +the corn by probing the ground, and by the ‘question’ applied to +captives, which I cannot prevent. The detachment of the Leopard +tribe are without water, and have been so for a day. I am sorry for +it. Consider it as we may, war is a brutal, cruel affair. . . . You +see the people coming over the sand, like flies on a wall. The poor +fugitives cannot stand the thirst, and are coming down one by one +to water. You have not the very least idea of the fearful effect of +want of water in this scorched-up country. . . . Hunger is nothing +to thirst; the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_116">[116]</span> one +can be eased by eating grass, the other is swift and +insupportable.”</p> + +<p>And all—though he succeeded with the help of his Italian +Lieutenant, Gessi, in breaking up the chief slave trading band +under Suliman Zebehr—for almost nothing. He finds he cannot solve +the problem. “There are some 6,000 more slave dealers in the +interior who will obey me now they have heard that Zebehr’s son and +the other chiefs have given in. You can imagine what a difficulty +there is in dealing with all these armed men. I have separated them +here and there, and in course of time will rid myself of the mass. +Would you shoot them all? Have they no rights? Are they not to be +considered? Had the planters no rights? Did not our Government once +allow slave-trading? Do you know that cargoes of slaves came into +Bristol Harbour in the time of our fathers? . . . I must notice to +you one thing which is very different among the society here and +that of the planters in the Colonies. One never hears of owners of +slaves keeping gangs of them for field labour, or for cultivation. +They are kept for slave servants, or by the slave dealers as slave +troops. . . . Certain Greeks are now at Katarif on whom I have my +eye, who have gangs of slaves cultivating cotton. I mean to make a +swoop on them. In fact the condition of the negro is incomparably +better in these lands than ever it was in the West Indies, and I +therefore claim for my people a greater kindness of heart than was +possessed by the planters, with all their Christian profession and +civilization. You speak of Mohammedanism being imperilled [he means +in peril of damnation]. Not so. I find the Mussulman quite as good +a Christian as many a Christian, and do not believe he is in any +peril. All of us are more or less pagans. I like the Mussulman; he +is not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_117">[117]</span> ashamed of +his God; his life is a fairly pure one. Certainly he gives himself +a good margin in the wife line, but at any rate he never poaches on +others. Can our Christian people say the same?”</p> + +<p>It is of importance to consider these sayings of Gordon’s in +connection with his subsequent action, which so surprised and +shocked his English friends six years later.</p> + +<p>“This morning I came on a caravan of slaves which is +accompanying me—some sixty or eighty men, women and children +chained. What am I to do with them? Their homes are too far off to +send them to; so I decided to make the slave merchant take off +their chains as scandalous, and then to leave them with him. He, +looking on them as valuable cows, will look well after them. Don +Quixote would have liberated them, and made an attempt to send them +back some forty days march through hostile tribes to their +homes—which they would have never reached. The only remedy is to +stop slave raids on the frontier. . . . You must stop it at its +source. Once the slaves have left the source it is useless to try. +. . . In all previous emancipations, either there has been a strong +government to enforce obedience, or a majority of the nation wished +it. Here in this country there is not one that wishes it, or who +would aid it even by advice. . . . <em>No one</em> is uninterested +in the matter.” And he could not stop the trade. It was like the +hydra with a hundred heads. As soon as he cut off one band another +took its place. As soon as he closed one entrance to the slave +caravans another entrance was discovered. What he achieved was a +miracle, for all depended on himself and his one European +Lieutenant, Gessi. No one else either in the Soudan or Cairo cared +for or wished to see the traffic stopped.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_118">[118]</span>The last year of +Gordon’s Governor-Generalship was one of harassing disappointments. +The Khedive had failed him. He received no more support. There was +a new regime at Cairo, the Nubar-Wilson one. He was at loggerheads +with it, and talks of it in his letters as a “Hermaphrodite +government.” They did not understand him, and he had no respect for +them. It was a constant exchange of telegrams between Cairo and +Khartoum in which Cairo made impossible demands for money, and +Khartoum responded with bitter refusals. He was left quite unaided +in regard to the slave trade. “I have no belief,” he wrote, “in the +Cairo Government acting against slavery. . . . Nubar never helped +me at the equator, though I wrote to him frequently, waste of time +as it was!” It was the same with the Khedive, though he still +pitied him, for Ismaïl was now at bay surrounded by the financial +wolves that were on the point of devouring him.</p> + +<p>“I can say truly,” he writes in 1879; “that my life is one long +series of flesh-vexing telegrams, of rows, of disputes—a regular +Ishmaelite existence—I am at war with nearly every one at Cairo, +and my crest is a thistle.” “I am exceedingly weary, and wish with +a degree of bitterness that it was all over. I am cooped up here +(at Khartoum) now, and am much occupied with the finances, which +are in a very low state. . . . I am striking daily deadly blows +against the slave trade, and am establishing a sort of Government +of Terror about it.” “I am stronger than ever in my belief that if +H. H. had taken my advice he would be in a better plight than he is +now, and at any rate would have fallen with dignity. Now I see by +the paper he is offering to abdicate. This sort of thing cannot +last, and I fear for him. He cannot go straight—even his dispatches +to me are<span class="pagenum" id="Page_119">[119]</span> all +evasive. . . . The continual wars that I carry on, and cannot help, +are very wearisome; and I feel more and more daily ‘How long? how +long?’”</p> + +<p>It was in this state of despair, and weary of his life that +Gordon threw himself into the excitement of his last campaign +against the Darfour slave raiders, a campaign he was not destined +to finish, for he was recalled in the midst of it once more to +Cairo, and had to leave the final capture of the chief raider, +Suliman Zebehr, to his Lieutenant Gessi. He had lost, however, his +zest for fighting. “I no longer delight in war,” he writes, “or +fights like this one before me. I look on the accounts one reads of +wars as so much romance writing, and, somewhat like the Chinese +people, I have rather a contempt for the warrior. . . . Eminent +services, etc., are eminent nonsense.” His iron health, too, was +breaking down. “I have almost entirely given up smoking, for I am +much affected in my circulation. If I had gone on with it much +longer I believe my heart would have stopped altogether. I may +indeed say that I have lost every desire in a material way for the +things of this life, and I have no wish for eating, drinking, or +comforts. If I have a wish for anything, it would be for a +dreamless sleep.” It was a terrible oppression to him, too, to find +that in spite of all he could do the slave trade was only “scotched +not killed.” Indeed it flourished still, despite the cost. “I have +just made a calculation of the loss of life in Darfour during the +years 1875-1879. It comes to 16,000 Egyptians, and some 50,000 +natives of Darfour—add to this the loss of life on the Bahr Gazelle +some 15,000, and you will have a fine total of 81,000; and this +exclusive of the slave trade which one may put down for three years +at from 80,000 to 100,000. Upwards of 470 slave dealers have been +driven out<span class="pagenum" id="Page_120">[120]</span> of this +place since I came here two days ago. This evening we were +surprised at a caravan coming in. The slave dealers had come on +here with them, and hearing I was here, and having no water, they +abandoned their slaves and fled. The slaves were sadly distressed +by thirst, thirty had died on the road. Though the water here is +putrid, and everything is wretched enough, I am revived when I make +these captures. You must count them up. From Oomchanga to Toashia, +during, say, a week, we must have caught from 500 to 600. I suppose +we may consider that nearly that number must have been passing +every week for the last year and a half or two years along this +road!!! and this during my tenure of office!!!—which is very +creditable to me. These slaves just captured have been four to five +days without water. They were in the most terrible distress.” A few +days later, 21st July, he takes what was to be his final leave of +Khartoum, till his last fatal return to it in 1884. “I shall D.V. +leave for Cairo in ten days. . . . I am a wreck, like the portion +of the ‘Victory,’ towed into Gibraltar after Trafalgar; but God has +enabled me, or rather has used me, to do what I wished to do—that +is to break down the slave trade.”</p> + +<p>It was his last word of comfort to his sick soul. At Cairo, when +he arrived there, he found a new order of things established still +less to his mind than the old one had been. The Khedive Ismaïl had +made his exit from the scene, and his place was occupied, not +filled, by the poor dummy Tewfik, with the Anglo-French financial +control for tutor and guardian. He did not long consent to serve +it. After finding himself sent on a fool’s errand to Abyssinia, +where he nearly met his death, he folded his tent and, shaking the +dust of Egypt from his feet,<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_121">[121]</span> once more returned to England. Nothing then +was further from his mind than that he should ever see the Nile +again. Body and soul he had been overwrought. The British surgeon +who examined him at Alexandria before he left found him suffering +from “symptoms of nervous exhaustion and alteration of the blood.” +He recommended “several months of complete rest and quiet,” and +insisted strongly on his “abstaining from all exciting work, +especially such as implies business or political excitement.”</p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_122">[122]</span><a id= +"c04"></a>CHAPTER IV</h2> + +<p class="sch1">GORDON IN PALESTINE</p> + +<p class="dcap">SUCH is the history of Gordon’s first service in +the Soudan under Ismaïl Pasha, from 1874 to 1879, in its principal +features as gathered from his own letters. At this time of his +life, 1880, there is no question that to the official world in +England as in Egypt, except among his intimate friends who knew him +well, Gordon was considered mad; nor wholly, perhaps, without +excuse. He had quarrelled in his last two years with nearly every +official person at Cairo, including the new Viceroy Tewfik, Nubar +Pasha, and most of the Khedivial ministers, as well as with M. de +Lesseps and Lord Cromer. There is an interesting memorandum drawn +up by himself relating the circumstances which led to his collision +with the last of these, and, as it throws light on their later +relations, as well as giving a lively picture of the writer, it +will be worth epitomizing here.</p> + +<p>The memorandum tells us that in the spring of 1878 Ismaïl Pasha, +being in financial difficulties, sent for him (Gordon) to come from +Khartoum to Cairo, and help him in making an arrangement with the +representatives of his creditors. “I arrived,” says Gordon, “on the +7th March, at 9.30 p.m. His Highness sent his equerry to meet me at +the terminus and was waiting dinner. Dirty as I was, after a +railway journey of 350 miles, I had to obey, but before dinner His +Highness took me aside and asked me to be President of an Inquiry +into the state of the finances of the country. . . . I said I would +accept the Commission of Inquiry as President. His Highness said, +‘You will see Lesseps, who will act with<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_123">[123]</span> you.’ I said ‘Yes,’ and accepted the +mission with the agreement that the Commissioners of the Dette were +not to be on the Inquiry. I was angry with these Commissioners +because I thought they had been too hard on His Highness. The next +day I saw Mr. Vivian, the English Consul-General, and he said, ‘I +wonder you could accept the Presidency without the Commissioners of +the Dette.’ I said I was free to accept or to refuse. I then called +on the German Consul-General, and when there the French and +Austrian Consuls-General and also Vivian came in, and attacked me +for having accepted the post of President. They said I was risking +His Highness his throne, if he formed the Commission of Inquiry +without the creditors’ representatives. I said, ‘Why do you not +tell him so?’ They said, ‘You ought to do so.’ I said, ‘Well, will +you commission me to do so from you with any remarks I like to make +as to the futility of your remarks?’ They all said, ‘Yes, we +authorize you to do so in our names.’ I did so that evening, and +told His Highness just before dinner at Abdin. I said, ‘I have seen +the four Consuls-General to-day, and they told me to tell your +Highness from them that you run a serious personal risk if you have +a Commission of Inquiry without the Commissioners of the Dette +being upon it.’ His Highness did not seem to care a bit, and said +he was only afraid of England, who he was sure would not move. He +said, ‘You will see Lesseps to-morrow and arrange the Enquête with +him.’ The next day Lesseps came with Standen, now Resident +Commissioner for the British Government Suez Canal Shares at Paris, +an old friend of mine. Lesseps began, ‘We must have the +Commissioners of the Dette on the Enquête.’ I said, ‘It is a +<em>sine qua non</em> that they are not to be upon it.’ Lesseps +replied,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_124">[124]</span> ‘They must +be upon it.’ Then in came Cherif Pasha and said, ‘Are you agreed?’ +I left Lesseps to speak and he said ‘Yes,’ at which I stared and +said, ‘I fear not.’ Then Lesseps and Cherif Pasha discussed it, and +Lesseps gave in and agreed to serve on the Commission without the +Commissioners, but he must ask permission from Paris. Cherif Pasha +was pleased, but I instinctively felt old Lesseps was ratting, so I +asked Cherif Pasha to stop a moment and said to Standen, ‘Now see +that Lesseps does not make a mess of it, let him say at once will +he act without the Commissioners of Dette or not, do this for my +sake, take him into that corner and speak to him.’ Standen did so +while I took Cherif Pasha into the other corner, much against his +will, for he thought I was a bore raising obstacles. I told him +that Lesseps had declared before he came he would not act unless +with the Commissioners. Cherif was huffed with me and turned to +Lesseps, whom Standen had already dosed in his corner of the room, +and he and Lesseps had a close conversation again for some time, +and then Cherif came to me and said, ‘Lesseps has accepted without +the Commissioners of the Dette. I disgusted Cherif as I went +downstairs with him by saying, ‘He will never stick to it.’ When +downstairs in one of the many antechambers to the Palace His +Highness gave me (shall I ever lodge in palaces again? I hope not) +I found Baring. Now Baring is in the Royal Artillery, while I am in +the Royal Engineers. Baring was in the nursery while I was in the +Crimea. He has a pretentious grand patronizing way about him. We +had a few words together. I said I would do what His Highness asked +me. He said it was unfair to the creditors, and in a few moments +all was over. When oil mixes with water we will mix together! I +went upstairs.”</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_125">[125]</span>This is +interesting as a record of the incompatibility of temper and ideas +existing between Gordon and Cromer six years before 1884. It +explains indeed what would otherwise be inexplicable, the quarrel +that broke out at once between them when Gordon returned to Cairo +on his final mission.</p> + +<p>It is not necessary to continue Gordon’s story of how he was +played with on the earlier occasion by our Cairo diplomatists, but +one scene which gives us an amusing glimpse of Lesseps, and at the +same time of Gordon’s character, I will add: “The next morning,” he +continues, “the 8th March at 9 I went to Lesseps en route to His +Highness. Lesseps said, ‘See what Cherif Pasha has written to me.’ +‘Mon cher Vicomte, son Altesse le Khedive m’a chargé de vous +présenter ses grands remerciments pour avoir accepté d’être sur la +Commission d’Enquête et elle me prie d’ajouter que c’est ce qu’elle +a toujours attendu d’un si ancien ami de Mehemet Ali et ses fils.’ +This letter had been written before I saw Lesseps, and of course +His Highness thanked him for being upon the Enquête +<em>without</em> the four Commissioners of the Dette, which Lesseps +declined to do except under certain conditions, so the letter was +written to Lesseps thanking him for services which the Khedive was +furious about. Lesseps said, looking at his pretty young wife of +twenty-two, ‘I am off to Halowan and shall not be back until night. +I have telegraphed to my Government to ask permission to be on the +Enquête with you. Here is a copy of the telegram, will you give it +to His Highness?’ He gave it over to me to read. I read it, it was +thus: ‘Son Altesse le Khedive m’a prié de me joindre avec M. Gordon +et les Commissionaires de la Caisse pour faire une Enquête sur les +finances d’Egypte, je demande permission.’<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_126">[126]</span> I said, ‘Oh! my dear old fellow M. Lesseps, +this will never do.’ He said, ‘Well, anyway it is off, and I am off +to Halowan and shall not be back to-night.’ Well, off I had to go +with this telegram to Abdin. Cherif and Riaz Pasha were in the +antechamber, drowsy and happily smoking. As I went in I saw a +bald-headed ‘coot,’ the Consul-General of the Pays Bas, going in to +His Highness. Cherif drowsily said, ‘Well, any news?’ I said, ‘No, +only I have a telegram for His Highness from Lesseps.’ So Riaz and +Cherif chatted away in Turkish till I saw the ‘coot’ go out and +Cherif was called in. Suddenly Cherif came flying out, all +drowsiness gone, and said, ‘Where is the telegram of Lesseps?’ I +gave it him and then in came flying Pharaoh (the Khedive) with +Cherif. Pharaoh threw himself on the sofa and said, ‘Je suis tout à +fait bouleversé avec ce télégramme de Lesseps. C’est tout à fait +contre mes désirs. Barrat! (l’esclave écrivain de son altesse) +venez ici, dites à quelqu’un d’aller à Halowan et de dire à Lesseps +de ne pas télégraphier à Paris,’ and then turning to me His +Highness said, ‘I put the whole affair into your hands.’ Then, +calling Barrat, he said, ‘Telegraph to Goschen, Gordon is charged +with the whole affair, arrange with him.’ Consequently I +telegraphed to Goschen, ‘I have recommended His Highness to suspend +the payment of the next Coupon in order to pay the employés and +meet pressing claims. I will arrange with you for the Commission of +Inquiry into the finances.’ Goschen answered, ‘I will not look at +you, the matter is in the hands of Her Majesty’s Government.’ I +then wrote to His Highness and proposed that he should suspend the +payment of the Coupon and pay the employés and pressing claims, +that he should do it by decree and quote me. Throw all the blame +upon me, saying if<span class="pagenum" id="Page_127">[127]</span> +he did not like to do this I would myself write to Lord Derby, to +say I had recommended His Highness to do so-and-so; that I did not +ask Her Majesty’s Government to give any acquiescence to it, but +merely to tell them if the Khedive did this, it was my fault. The +Khedive hesitated and did not answer me, and shut himself up in his +harem for two days and the game was lost. (There would have been no +risk in this.) Vivian (English Consul-General), of course, was on +the <em>qui vive</em>; he knew that some strong measure was in +prospect, and telegraphed to Her Majesty’s Government, begging the +same to authorize him to join the French Consul-General, to stop +His Highness taking any sharp measures. Of course Vivian pointed +out the Red Republican nature of your humble servant. Lord Derby, +against anything abrupt, telegraphed to Vivian, who came to me and +said, ‘I have a telegram; I will read it to you; but you are not to +say anything about it until I have communicated it to His Highness, +for it would not be proper.’ The telegram ran thus: ‘You are +authorized in conjunction with your French colleague, to inform His +Highness that Her Majesty’s Government trusts His Highness will do +nothing without accordance with his creditors, and that Her +Majesty’s Government are willing to send Rivers Wilson out to help +him, and that Her Majesty’s Government think that Baring ought to +be on the Inquiry.’ Vivian then said, ‘What will you recommend His +Highness to do?’ I said, ‘I would recommend him to bow to Her +Majesty’s Government.’ Vivian said, ‘What will he do?’ I said, ‘He +might say I am sovereign and will do as I will.’ Vivian (who was a +pretty black-eyed boy, and was put by General Fox under my care at +the Royal Military Academy, and whom Ruck<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_128">[128]</span> Keene kicked on the ankle when he was +removed from that rough school) went home, and on the morrow went +in great pomp to His Highness with the French Consul-General, +saying on leaving, ‘C’est tout ce que nous avons à dire à votre +altesse pour le moment.’ Of course my tongue was tied; but before +they (the two Consuls-General) went to His Highness I wrote to +Cherif Pasha, and said, hoping to take the wind out of their sails, +‘Tell His Highness if he is troubled, to ask Her Majesty’s +Government for Rivers Wilson to come out and help me’; and I added +(for I had begun to see, with Pharaoh wavering, it was necessary +for <em>me</em> to look to <em>my retreat</em>), ‘I will not act +with any of the four Commissioners of the Dette.’ This also gave +His Highness a reason for refusing Her Majesty’s Government’s +recommendation, that Baring should be on the Commission of Inquiry, +because he could quote my objections.</p> + +<p>“Now, would you believe it? Vivian never gave His Highness the +true telegram. He and the French Consul-General gave him a paper: +‘Our Governments authorize us to inform your Highness, that they +trust you will only act in accord with your creditors.’ Unimportant +as this paper was, it sickened him for two days, during which he +only spoke of the Soudan; till at last I took an opportunity, as +the moment of secrecy was over, to tell him what the true telegram +was. He looked quite surprised and said, ‘Why, they never told me +that!’ The fact, however, was that the paper the Consuls-General +gave him was so vague, and the solemnity of their manner was so +great, that His Highness got frightened; and when I did tell him, +after these two days, he had already given in, and had agreed to +have the Commissioners of the Caisse (or Dette)<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_129">[129]</span> upon the Inquiry, and as a +sequel to call for Rivers Wilson. He never told me he had given in; +but four days after I heard of it, and on my seeing him he said +(for it was no longer a secret that he had ceded), ‘Have you any +news?’ I said, ‘Yes, I hear your Highness has agreed to the four +Commissioners of the Dette being on the Inquiry.’ He said ‘Yes’ and +the subject dropped. Five days after that I left Cairo with no +honours by the ordinary train, paying my passage. The sun which +rose with such splendour, set in the deepest obscurity. I calculate +my financial episode cost me £800. His Highness was bored with me +after my failure, and could not bear the sight of me, which his +surroundings soon knew. I dare say I may have been imprudent in +speech. I have no doubt it is better as it is. His Highness and I +would have fallen out about the composition of the Commission of +Inquiry, for I feel sure it was meant to be packed, and that I was +only to be the figure head; but the families of the Ameer of +Afghanistan will never change their natures; peace be to them.”</p> + +<p>After this things had only gone from bad to worse in Gordon’s +relations with the official world. His last act at Cairo, just +before leaving it as he thought for ever at the end of 1879, was to +have a serious quarrel with Nubar Pasha. He held Nubar responsible +for much of Ismaïl’s indebtedness to Europe, and for the +international pressure which had been put upon him, and had led to +his deposition; and at their leave-taking he had spoken his opinion +of him so strongly to his face that he considered it necessary to +offer the Armenian ex-Minister “satisfaction.” There are letters +extant referring to this and to Nubar’s answer declining the +hostile invitation.</p> + +<p>There are some curious letters, too, which Gordon<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_130">[130]</span> wrote about the time of his +arrival in London to Lady Burton, wife of Sir Richard Burton, who, +like himself, had quarrelled with the Foreign Office, giving his +opinion on the chief official personages at Cairo, and of those at +home. In one of these he says, 4th February 1880: “You write to an +orb which is setting or rather is set; I have no power to aid your +husband in any way. I went to F. O. to-day and, as you know, Lord +Hammond is very ill. Well, the people there were afraid of me, for +I have written hard things to them, and though they knew all, they +would say nought. I said, ‘Who is the personification of Foreign +Office?’ They said, ‘Currie is.’ I saw Currie, but he tried to +evade my question, <em>i.e.</em>, ‘Would F. O. do anything to +prevent the Soudan falling into chaos?’ It was no use. I cornered +him, and then he said, ‘I am merely a clerk to register letters +coming in and going out.’ So then I gave it up and marvelled. I +must say I was surprised to see such a thing, a great Government +like ours governed by men who dare not call their souls their own. +Lord Hammond rules them with a rod of iron. If your husband would +understand that F. O. is at present Lord Hammond, and he is ill, he +would see that I can do nothing. I have written letters to F. O. +that would raise a corpse; it is no good. I have threatened to go +to the French Government about the Soudan; it is no good.”</p> + +<p>Again, from Lausanne, 12th March 1880: “Of course your husband +failed with Tewfik. I scent carrion a long way off and felt that +the hour of my departure from Egypt had come, so I left quietly. +Instead of A (Ismaïl), who was a good man, you have B (Tewfik), who +may be good or bad as events will allow him. B is the true son of +A, but has the inexperience of youth and may be smarter. +The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_131">[131]</span> problem working +out in the small brains of Tewfik is this: ‘my father lost his +throne because he scouted the creditors; the Government only cared +for the creditors; they did not care for good government, so if I +look after the creditors I may govern the country as I like.’ No +doubt Tewfik is mistaken, but these are his views backed up by a +ring of Pashas.”</p> + +<p>And a month later from Paris: “I do not like or believe in +Nubar. He is my horror; for he had led the old ex-Khedive to his +fall, though Nubar owed him everything. When Ismaïl became Khedive, +Nubar had £3 a month; he now owns £1,000,000. Things will not and +cannot go straight in Egypt; and I would say, ‘Let them glide.’ +Before long time elapses things will come to a crisis. The best way +is to let all minor affairs rest, and to consider quietly how the +ruin is to fall. It must fall ere long. United Bulgaria—Austria; +Syria—France; and Egypt—England. France would then have as much +interest in repelling Russia as we have. Supposing you got out +Riaz, why you would have Riaz’s brother; and if you got rid of the +latter, you would have Riaz’s nephew. <em>Le plus on change, le +plus c’est la même chose</em>. . . . Egypt is usurped by the family +of the Sandjak of Salonique, and (by our folly) we have added a +ring of Circassian pashas. The whole lot should go.”</p> + +<p>These letters show what Gordon’s attitude was towards the +Khedive Tewfik and the regime of the Dual Control, and are useful +as explaining how impossible it seemed two and three years later at +Cairo that he should ever again be employed in the Khedivial +service, or accept such were it offered him. It was hardly better +as between him and the Foreign Office. His final quarrel with our +diplomacy will be found narrated in an entry of my diary of 1880 +quoted in my “Secret History,” which tells the story<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_132">[132]</span> of Gordon’s correspondence +with Lord Lyons at the Paris Embassy on his way home to England. It +was in regard to what he considered ought to be done in the matter +of appointing his successor at Khartoum, and this was repeated at +the Foreign Office on his arrival in London. Talking over this +episode of Gordon’s career with Sir Rivers Wilson recently (1910), +he repeated to me the story with more circumstantial details. At +that time, the spring of 1880, Wilson was in the habit of being +consulted at the Foreign Office on Egyptian matters; and he told me +that on one occasion he was sent for by Lord Salisbury, who was +then Foreign Secretary, and asked his opinion of Gordon in +connection with some proposals that had been made at the War Office +for his re-employment. Wilson, while Finance Minister at Cairo the +year before, had come into collision with Gordon, not personally +but officially, and a number of violent telegrams had passed +between the two, Gordon being at Khartoum, Wilson at Cairo. They +had never met, and now both had left Egypt, and both under an +official cloud. Wilson, in spite of their quarrel and though he +considered Gordon wrong-headed and perverse, entertained a high +personal respect for him, and hearing of his arrival in London, +left a card on him at the hotel where he was lodging, and Gordon +returned the visit next morning, as he explained, “to apologize for +the rudeness of his telegrams.” Wilson on this occasion was much +taken with “the strange little unpretending man with eyes like blue +diamonds,” and had much conversation with him about the affairs of +Egypt, in which both were interested; he knew the common talk at +the Foreign Office, where Gordon was considered mad, and when a few +days later Salisbury asked his opinion about him, he +understood<span class="pagenum" id="Page_133">[133]</span> at once +what was in question, Gordon’s sanity, and answered that though +Gordon for all ordinary Foreign Office work was officially +“impossible,” nevertheless, if there were anything exceptionally +astonishing to do in a wild country, he was the man to do it, as, +for instance, to settle matters with Cetewayo, the Zulu chieftain +who was giving trouble in South Africa.<a id= +"FNanchor_17"></a><a href="#Footnote_17" class="fnanchor">[17]</a> +Nevertheless, the idea of Gordon’s madness persisted at the Foreign +Office, and he remained unemployed either there or at the War +Office as long as the Tories were in power.</p> + +<p>Gordon’s life for the next year was a series of abortive +undertakings, accepted in haste and repented of at leisure. On the +formation of Gladstone’s ministry of May 1880, Lord Ripon, having +been appointed Viceroy of India, offered him the post, a very +important one, of going with him as his official private secretary. +The offer was made to him through the instrumentality of Lord +Northbrook, who had been in correspondence with him about various +matters during his own Viceroyalty, and Gordon, under the idea that +an entirely new departure was about to be taken in India, according +to those principles of justice and self-government of which he +approved, without well considering his own unfitness for a post +whose principal duties were essentially those of +conciliation,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_134">[134]</span> +self-effacement, and the disguising of unpleasant truths, in an +ill-considered moment accepted. An interesting memorandum will be +found in the Appendix giving the true story of Gordon’s ideas at +starting with Lord Ripon, and the reason of his resignation within +a few days of their arrival at Bombay. It has never before, I +believe, been published. He had held the post barely a month.<a id= +"FNanchor_18"></a><a href="#Footnote_18" class= +"fnanchor">[18]</a></p> + +<p>Three days later, 7th July, we find him embarked on a new +adventure in consequence of a telegram received from China, whither +he had been called by Sir Robert Hart to advise on a threatened +quarrel between the Chinese Emperor and the Emperor of Russia; and +without delay he proceeds thither, gives his advice for peace, +which is sound and good, but refuses to stay more than two days at +Pekin, and, having come into collision with our diplomacy at +Tientsin, as he had before at Cairo, he leaves once more for +England, which he reaches 21st October. His restless energy at this +period seems to have had no bounds.</p> + +<p>The same autumn saw him in the west of Ireland, whither he had +gone “to have a little shooting and satisfy himself on the state of +the lower classes.” Here again he was bent upon good work, and from +Glengariff addressed a memorandum to Lord Northbrook on the subject +of settling the land question on lines identical with those adopted +in 1886, but so far in advance of what Gladstone’s Government was +as yet prepared for that Downing Street became more than ever +convinced that, as Sir E. Hamilton wrote to me about it, “the +writer did not seem to be clothed in the rightest of minds.”<a id= +"FNanchor_19"></a><a href="#Footnote_19" class="fnanchor">[19]</a> +In February 1881 we find him offering his views (quite sound ones) +about Afghanistan to the “Times,”<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_135">[135]</span> and about the art of irregular warfare to +the “Army and Navy Gazette.” In April he offers his services to the +Cape Government to assist in terminating the Basuto war, and soon +after, in May, wishing to serve a friend, he volunteers for +Mauritius. In July and September he addresses the Government on the +question of the Suez Canal, the route to India by the Cape, and the +uselessness of Malta and Gibraltar; and on the 24th of March 1882, +having received his promotion to the rank of General, he leaves +Mauritius for the Cape, where he accepts new service in Basutoland +and does good work. But again not for long; and the 14th of October +sees him once more in England—having again quarrelled with the Cape +authorities. The year had been one of constant activity and +constant change, and of that unconscious self-advertisement he +reproached himself with later to his sister as “Agag” or “hailing +the tram of the world.”</p> + +<p>It was at this time, during his short stay in London at the +close of 1882, that I had the talk with him described at the +beginning of this volume. His personality, as I saw him then, +remains very clear with me. It is that of a little, quite +unmilitary man, not specially distinguished except for his clear +gray-blue eyes, and his singularly frank, unconventional manner. +There was nothing in the smallest degree assertive about him, or +which could give a stranger the idea of his being a leader of men, +or a man accustomed to authority and importance in the world. His +conversation was pleasant without any special grace of manner, and +he impressed me principally with an appearance of extreme natural +goodness and honesty of speech. He had, what is often the case with +men of very superior understanding, a great humility in expressing +his opinion even about those<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_136">[136]</span> things he knew the best. At the same time +he was quite able to maintain his own in argument, and had much wit +and pleasant humour in discussion. He seemed to take it for granted +that the person he was talking to was as good and honest as +himself, and with as good a right to an opinion. At that time, as +far as my recollection goes, he had no thought of ever returning to +Egypt. He had quarrelled too entirely with Tewfik and the Pashas, +who composed the Khedivial Court party under the restored regime, +to think it possible. His mind was set on a religious retreat in +the Holy Land, and, if he had any other plan beyond, it was to take +service under King Leopold on the Congo. It was one of his +aberrations of intelligence to be constantly deceived as to +character, and he looked upon Leopold as an enlightened prince, and +his Congo scheme as a humanitarian enterprise for the suppression +of the slave trade.</p> + +<p>Thus at the end of the year 1882, instead of going to Egypt he +left England for Jerusalem, and stayed on in its neighbourhood for +nearly the whole of 1883. This was the most mystical part of his +life, and has been fully dealt with in various semi-religious +works. I confess that it is difficult for any one who is not +himself a mystic to read these without a suspicion that on this one +point Gordon was at this time less than entirely sane. His great +object in visiting the Holy Land was to re-read the Bible, which +had been his constant study all his life, on the spot where so many +of the events recorded in it happened. He had convinced himself +that by prayer and study every riddle contained in the Book could +be made clear down to the smallest historical and geographical +allusions, hence his time was devoted to localizing the various +biblical events, and reconciling difficulties<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_137">[137]</span> by solutions, which he considered to be +inspired as he read. This led him sometimes into a labyrinth of +impossibilities, which he nevertheless clung to and expounded in +his letters to his friends, and not to his religious friends only, +or to his sister, though these were the chief recipients of his +confidences, but to some whom one would have thought entirely +outside the category of those to whom such could possibly be made. +One of them may be quoted as showing how far he was from the track +of ordinary reason about the physical facts of the modern world we +know. It might have been written by a recluse of the sixth century, +while it was addressed to one no less a Gallio about spiritual +things than the late Sir Richard Burton. Gordon had been trying to +identify the respective sites of the Garden of Eden and of Ararat, +where Noah’s Ark rested, with other points of biblical geography, +which he thought might interest Burton as a geographer and Oriental +scholar. “My idea,” he says, writing from Jerusalem, June 3, 1883, +“is that the Pison is the Blue Nile, and that the sons of Joktan +were at Harrar, Abyssinian Godjam, but it is not well supported. +The rock of Harrar was the platform Adam was moulded on out of clay +from the Potters’ Field. He was then put in Seychelles, Eden, and +after the Fall, brought back to Mount Moriah to till the ground in +the place he was taken from. Noah built the ark twelve miles from +Jaffa at Aïn Judeh; the Flood began, the Ark floated up and rested +on Mount Baris, afterwards Antonia; he sacrificed on the Rock (Adam +was buried on Skull Hill, hence the skull under the Cross). It was +only 776 <span class="sc2">A.D.</span> that Mount Ararat of Armenia +became the site of the Ark’s descent. Koràn says El Judi (Ararat) +is holy land. After the Flood the remnants went East to plain of +Shimar. Had they gone<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_138">[138]</span> East from El Judi, near Mosul, or from +Armenian Ararat they could never have reached Shimar. Shem was +Melchizedek.” Was ever serious letter written to so mocking a +reader?</p> + +<p>The question of Gordon’s religious monomania is a difficult one +to handle. In treating it, it is hardly possible not to do violence +to what is sacred to us all, our beliefs, avowed or unavowed, in +the supernatural. There are very few who in their hearts do not +hold and cling to beliefs quite contrary to reason, and who do not +attach to their own personalities an importance in the immensity of +things they cannot at all deserve. Who then of us has a right to +say of his fellow that he is less than reasonable because he +believes this or that doctrine of his relations with the unseen +more strongly than the rest? Gordon was not singular among +Englishmen, even in our unbelieving day, in his thought that God +had created him for a special purpose in the world—it is indeed the +foundation of all Christian doctrine—nor is it easy to argue that +the logical deduction he drew from it that God, having so created +him, was also in constant communication with him, inspiring him +with a daily knowledge how to fulfil that purpose, was other than a +sane one. Nevertheless we cannot leave out of account this feature +of the position if we are to consider the public case, which we are +now fast approaching. The truth would seem to be that his year at +Jerusalem was for him, if I may use an expression theologians would +not I think condemn, a complete religious debauch which left him +more than ever the prey of his own visions, a puppet in the hands +of his imagined duty to do this or that for God, he knew not what, +which God should presently reveal to him. He was waiting for a +call. His letters that year to his sister and to Doctor Barnes, a +friend of the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_139">[139]</span> same +school of pietism as his own, give indications of this. Under +Doctor Barnes’ influence he had during the past two years shifted +somewhat his position in regard to the Church of England, of which +he was not before a professed member. He had never been confirmed, +but he now became a regular communicant, even adopting the doctrine +of transubstantiation, or at any rate of there being supernatural +elements in the sacrament of bread and wine. His letters are full +of this. He corresponded, too, while at Jerusalem with English +Church dignitaries, and through Doctor Barnes became intimate with +Bishop Temple, and in this way the aspect of his religious mind, +which before had been extremely eclectic, became more definitely +that of orthodox English Christianity.</p> + +<p>Of what the future was to bring him he wrote little, but there +are several letters of his about Egypt which are of interest and +may be given here.</p> + +<p class="space-above15">These are to his sister:</p> + +<p>“28 <em>February</em> 1883.—Wonderful are the works of God in +the Soudan! Look at His work. He has upset the Egyptian people +thoroughly, and they will get their liberty from the oppressing +Pachas. He has permitted this revolt, which will end, I believe, in +the suppression of the slave trade and slave-holding, and He has +humbled <em>me</em>. I will speak about myself for one moment. I +foresaw the Egyptian and Soudan affair, and was not listened to. I +am glad I was humiliated, for the things of this world will pass +away. I expect Laurence Oliphant will go to the Soudan; there will +be no end of trouble to reconquer it, and I am sorely tempted to +write Lord Dufferin my ideas; but I will not, for Jesus is Lord and +He knows what to do.”</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_140">[140]</span>“3 +<em>March</em> 1883.—I have great comfort in thinking that our Lord +rules every petty and great event of life both on a small and large +scale. Therefore He governs the Soudan now through A., B., and C., +as much as he did when I was there, and neither I, nor A., B., and +C., have or had anything to do with the Government, as far as +others were concerned. With respect to the motives of our actions, +it is another matter; they are the permanent residues—the things +unseen. This comforts me, for I feel that their welfare, and the +course of events that takes place, are being conducted by the same +hand, whether I am there or not.”</p> + +<p>“13 <em>March</em>.—. . . I am quite quiet about the Cape and +the Soudan; my sympathies are with the people of those countries +and not with the Turkish Pashas whom our Government will try and +replace. Good will come of it.”</p> + +<p class="space-above15">To me he wrote: “<em>April</em> 3, 1883.—I +am living quietly enough here and do not hear anything from Egypt. +I expect Arabi will be back there in a year or so. Some of the +officers from Egypt have been here. I do not think that it will be +a favourite station for the army. I expect that the only man who +can, humanly speaking, give quiet to Egypt and some hope of our +benefiting the people is Nubar. He is the sort of man who could +work with Arabi, and I think the trials he has gone through have +benefited him. It is very quiet here, and one can live undisturbed, +which is a great comfort. Government ought to get Tewfik’s +deposition cancelled by the new House, for it has not been so at +present.”</p> + +<p class="space-above15">Again to his sister:</p> + +<p>“16 <em>April</em> 1883.—I am at work from morning +to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_141">[141]</span> night. As for +Egypt and the Cape, I no more care for them; and Lord Dufferin’s +despatch shows that, even had I gone out, it would have been +another fiasco.”</p> + +<p>“7 <em>May</em> 1883.—. . . I had a letter from Egypt which is +not very sanguine about the state of affairs, all because our +Government will not say they will stay; yet stay they must, whether +they like it or not.”</p> + +<p class="space-above15">On the 15th August, when the difficulty of +General Hicks’ position in the Soudan became known to him, he +wrote: “If they do not make Nubar Pasha prime minister or regent in +Egypt they will have trouble, as he is the only man who can rule +that country. . . . Unless Hicks is given supreme power he is lost, +it can never work putting him in a subordinate position, recent +events at Cairo show what dependence can be placed upon the Pashas. +. . . Hicks must be made Governor General, otherwise he will never +end things satisfactorily.” On 2nd September he writes to Laurence +Oliphant, then at Haifa: “Her Majesty’s Government right or wrong +will not take a decided line in re Egypt and the Soudan, they drift +but at the same time cannot avoid the onus of being the real power +in Egypt with the corresponding advantage of being so. It is +undoubtedly the fact that they maintain Tewfik and the Pashas in +power against the will of the people. This alone is insufferable +from disgusting the people, to whom also Her Majesty’s Government +have given no inducement to make themselves popular. Their present +action is a dangerous one, for without any advantage over the Canal +or to England, they keep a running sore open with France and are +acting in a way which will justify Russia to act in a similar way +in Armenia, and Austria in Salonica.<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_142">[142]</span> Further than that, Her Majesty’s Government +must eventually gain the odium which will fall upon them when the +interest of the debt fails to be paid, which will soon be the case. +Also, Her Majesty’s Government cannot possibly avoid the +responsibility for the state of affairs in the Soudan, where a +wretched war drags on in a ruined country, at a cost of half a +million per annum, at least.</p> + +<p>“I say therefore to avoid all this, if Her Majesty’s Government +will not act firmly and strongly and take the country (which, if I +were they, I would not do), let them attempt to get the Palestine +Canal made and quit Egypt to work out its own salvation. In doing +so lots of anarchy will take place. This anarchy is inseparable +from a peaceful solution; it is the travail in birth. Her Majesty’s +Government do not prevent anarchy now; therefore, better leave the +country and thus avoid a responsibility which gives no advantage +and is mean and dangerous.”</p> + +<p>“15 <em>September</em> 1883.—If the Palestine canal is made we +shall abandon Egypt, which will then get self government, and will +succeed under God’s blessing, for He has a blessing for it.”</p> + +<p>“28 <em>September</em> 1883.—. . . Graham (Sir Gerald) writes +from Egypt that he is likely to go there at the end of the year: +that looks as though we should evacuate it. I like watching how God +governs all things there; He acts to us as we act to others.”</p> + +<p>“25 <em>November</em> 1883.—. . . As for the Soudan, I am much +interested, but should feel repugnance to going back there; and +that is a great gain, for I had a sneaking desire to return there, +when I first came out here. As for the Congo, I have not much +choice left me.”</p> + +<p>The Palestine Canal, to which he alludes, was a somewhat +fanciful scheme much talked of at the time by which the Jordan +Valley and the Dead<span class="pagenum" id="Page_143">[143]</span> +Sea were to be inundated and transformed into a long narrow lake, +united at the one end with the Mediterranean by a cutting at Haifa, +and at the other end with the Red Sea at Akabah. It interested +Gordon principally because he looked upon it as the possible +fulfilment of Ezekiel’s prophecy, “Their fish [<em>i.e.</em>, of +the Dead Sea] shall be according to their kinds as the fish of the +great sea [Mediterranean] and it shall come to pass that the fishers +shall stand upon it from En-Gedi even unto En-Eglaim; they shall be +a place to spread forth nets.” He also looked upon it as a possible +alternative route to the Suez Canal, which was the excuse of our +having occupied Egypt. “Anything,” he says about the scheme, “is +better than the wretched want of sympathy between us and the +Egyptians, which is now daily increasing into a deadly hate. We +must have a nemesis unless we show more sympathy. What single good +thing have we done the people? . . . Our Government will never get +out of Egypt, for the Europeans there will thwart any reform.”</p> + +<p>These quotations are of some value as an indication of what his +policy was for Egypt as well as the Soudan, immediately previous to +his employment by the British Government there. As will be seen in +the next chapter, they must already to some extent have had their +influence at the Foreign Office. His thoughts, however, were but +little connected with Egypt. It was not to Egypt but to the Congo +that he intended to proceed, and it was in obedience to a summons +from King Leopold at the end of the year that, waking out of his +long religious trance, he returned to Europe. His first visit was +to Brussels, and only after he had arranged things there with +Leopold did he go on, on the 7th of January 1884, to his sister’s +house at Southampton.</p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_144">[144]</span><a id= +"c05"></a>CHAPTER V</h2> + +<p class="sch1">GORDON’S LAST MISSION</p> + +<p class="dcap">THE problem of how, notwithstanding Gordon’s +well-known views about the Soudan and Egypt, and the recollection +of his past conflicts with our diplomacy both at Cairo and in +Downing Street, and the belief entertained there of his madness, he +came to be once more employed by Gladstone’s Government, and sent +to Khartoum on a mission ostensibly not of his own choosing, and +then left to perish, is one of perennial interest, which history +has not yet finally solved. It has been variously dealt with by +official apologists as well as by Gordon’s friends. Morley has +given an authoritative version of it in his “Life of Gladstone,” +Fitzmaurice another in his “Life of Granville,” and Cromer yet a +third in his “Modern Egypt”; but they none of them agree; while +opposed to them we have Sir Henry Gordon’s and Egmont Hake’s +narratives, supplemented by Stead’s account of his own part in it, +and no few other annalists who each has added his contribution to +the general knowledge. Above all we have Gordon’s own diary at +Khartoum, and we have the Blue Books, a body of official +information bulkier, perhaps, than that concerning any individual +ever employed by the British Government since Blue Books were first +published. Nevertheless I doubt if the whole truth has yet been +told, or the real reasons given, or the responsibility of failure +placed quite on the right shoulders. I will endeavour to supply the +lacking evidence and reconcile the various narratives.</p> + +<p>The first official suggestion of Gordon’s +re-employment<span class="pagenum" id="Page_145">[145]</span> in +Egypt seems to have been due to Sir Charles Wilson, that excellent +engineer officer who, it will be remembered (see “Secret History”) +did such good service to Egypt and the cause of justice at the time +of Arabi’s trial. Wilson was at that time very closely in Lord +Dufferin’s confidence, having served under him as perambulating +Consul-General for some years in Asia Minor; and, being a personal +friend and fellow officer of Gordon’s and better acquainted than +any Englishman then at Cairo with Soudanese affairs, he was +consulted by Dufferin on the subject as soon as the latter arrived +in Egypt. The result was a despatch, dated 18th November 1882, in +which, after repeating Wilson’s opinion, Dufferin adds: “It can be +understood that the Khedive should be unwilling to abandon a +country with such possibilities of development; and it is probable +that, if only some person like Colonel Gordon could be found to +undertake its administration, fairly good government might be +maintained there without drawing upon Egypt either for men or +money. Colonel Gordon I believe has already broken up and +disorganized in a great measure the former centres of the slave +traffic, and the same energy and ability which has gone so near to +effecting this difficult task ought to be sufficient to keep the +country in order.”</p> + +<p>Although, as already explained, I do not believe that at that +date, and apart from a change of Khedive and a reconstruction of +the National party at Cairo, Gordon could have effected any +permanent settlement of the Soudan trouble unsupported by an +adequate military force from without, there was still a chance that +something of the sort might have succeeded.</p> + +<p>It is just possible that, if Gordon had been sent<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_146">[146]</span> at once to Khartoum, and that +if, as was being talked of at the end of the year 1882, Wilson had +succeeded Malet at Cairo, and a Nationalist Ministry been +reinstated, even under Tewfik, Gordon might have succeeded in +reconstituting an effective government at Khartoum in opposition to +the Mahdi, though I doubt it for the reasons already given. At any +rate the suggestion was not adopted—it is probable that Riaz and +the other Pashas of the restored regime opposed it<a id= +"FNanchor_20"></a><a href="#Footnote_20" class= +"fnanchor">[20]</a>—and nothing more came of it than the sending of +Colonel D. H. Stewart to Khartoum “to report,” and a little later, +January 1883, to an offer made by Dufferin to Wilson that he should +himself go to Khartoum as Governor-General. Wilson, I think, wisely +declined this, for it was already too late; and on his refusal +Hicks was entrusted with the thankless task, with the result we +have seen.</p> + +<p>Stewart’s report of affairs on arrival at Khartoum proved of the +most pessimistic kind. He placed the Mahdi’s followers at 338,000 +men, and recommended the abandonment of the southern and eastern +provinces to their own chiefs, and Darfour to its original Royal +Family. He pronounced the Egyptians “quite unfit in every way to +undertake such a trust as the government of so vast a country with +a view to its welfare”—and in opposition to Wilson, who believed in +the Soudan as a country of great prospective wealth, he pronounced +it to be a financial burden on Egypt hardly worth retaining.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_147">[147]</span>While mentioning +the names of these two distinguished officers, Wilson and Stewart, +who were destined to play each of them a tragic part in the coming +drama of Gordon’s defence of Khartoum, I will say what I remember +of them personally, for it so happened that I met them both at +Aleppo in the summer of 1881. They were travelling together at the +time, employed on special service as consuls in Asia Minor, under +the terms of the Cyprus Convention, and they were both staying, as +I was, for some days in the house of the British Consul. They were +men of very different types and characters. Wilson shared many of +Gordon’s characteristics. He was a serious man, with a large +knowledge of the East, and much sympathy with its peoples, +altogether humane and lovable. Like Gordon, he was a biblical +scholar and greatly interested in the topography of such of the +lands in which he travelled as were connected with the Old and New +Testaments. He had served with Palmer and others on the Palestine +Exploration Staff, and was full of learning on the subjects that +interested him. After our meeting at Aleppo he travelled with us to +Scanderoon, and on by sea as far as Smyrna, where we parted +company. I have always retained a very pleasant recollection of him +and a high respect for his character. Stewart, on the other hand, +though also a hard worker and a man of ability, was of a quite +different type. He was a smart young cavalry captain of Hussars, +the 11th, with all the ordinary English officer’s contempt for +“natives” and inability to deal courteously with them. Though I +found him an excellent fellow in other ways, our ideas on the East +differed entirely. He was all for the extension of English +authority, and had little sympathy with Orientals. He was desirous, +at the moment, of visiting the Anazeh tribes,<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_148">[148]</span> from some of which I had just come, and +I gave him letters to two or three of the leading Anazeh Sheykhs, +my friends. But he, after gallopping about the desert for some +weeks with a Turkish escort, gave up his attempt, having failed to +get into pleasant relations with any of them; they “were all,” he +explained to me, “such rogues and liars.” I judge his character by +this. He was a good, active, fearless young Englishman, with all +our English virtues, but too little fellow feeling with ways not +English to succeed in inspiring Eastern confidence. In one of his +dispatches from Khartoum he expresses his “contempt and disgust” +for what he holds to be the “cowardice” of the poor exiled Arabist +soldiers at Khartoum, sent to die in a cause they abhorred. He +could not understand their unwillingness as soldiers to fight.</p> + +<p>Lord Cromer’s high opinion of Stewart was justified by the fact +that both in their separate ways were typical of our English +intolerance of Oriental character, and one needs no other +explanation than this to understand how it was that Stewart and +Gordon failed to pull together. Stewart’s death by treachery at +Arab hands was one of the minor tragedies of the Nile campaign. His +report, nevertheless, of February 1883, was an able one, and had +considerable influence on Soudanese policy. Dufferin, in his own +report, written about the same time as Stewart’s, adopts more than +one of his ideas, and though Dufferin takes a far more cheerful +view of the situation, as was natural in a man of his hopeful Irish +nature, he recommends with Stewart the abandonment of the western +provinces. “Some persons,” says Dufferin, “are inclined to advise +Egypt to withdraw altogether from the Soudan and her other +acquisitions in that region. But she can hardly be expected to +acquiesce in such a policy. Possessing the lower<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_149">[149]</span> ranges of the Nile, she is +naturally inclined to claim dominion along its entire course; and +when it is remembered that the territories in question, if properly +developed, are capable of producing inexhaustible supplies of sugar +and cotton, we cannot be surprised at her unwillingness to abandon +them. Unhappily, Egyptian administration in the Soudan has been +almost uniformly unfortunate. The success of the present Mahdi . . +. is a sufficient proof of the Government’s inability either to +reconcile the inhabitants to its rule or to maintain order. The +consequences have been most disastrous.” He then goes on to say +that he places high hopes on General Hicks, who has just been +appointed Chief of the Staff at Khartoum, and to suggest the +construction of a Souakin to Berber railway, which would “change +all the elements of the problem. . . . The finances of the Soudan +once rehabilitated . . . commerce would eventually extend the +blessings of civilization for some distance through the surrounding +region. I apprehend, however,” he concludes, “that it would be wise +upon the part of Egypt to abandon Darfur, and perhaps Kordofan, and +to be content with maintaining her jurisdiction in the provinces of +Khartoum and Senaar.”</p> + +<p>This part of the report, we know from Wilson’s biographer, was +practically Wilson’s own; and we know also that Wilson and Gordon +were at one on the subject, and there can be little doubt that, if +Dufferin had had full power at the date of his report to deal with +the Soudan, and if Wilson had gone there, such would have been his +instructions. As it was, the Foreign Office resolved on doing +nothing, and Hicks was left unaided and undirected. It was not till +nine months later that the question of either Wilson or Gordon was +brought<span class="pagenum" id="Page_150">[150]</span> forward by +Lord Granville. It came about in this way.</p> + +<p>In the fortnight immediately following the news of Hicks’s +disaster, Gordon, who had powerful friends both at Cairo, in Sir +Charles Watson and Sir Evelyn Wood, and at the War Office, in Lord +Wolseley and Reginald Brett (Lord Esher), had his name brought +forward, whether consciously or unconsciously I am not sure, in +official circles as a possible saviour of what was now an almost +hopeless situation at Khartoum. At the War Office it was known that +Gordon, though he considered himself engaged to King Leopold for +the Congo, would not in his secret heart be otherwise than glad to +take the affairs of the Soudan once more in hand. He was beginning +to chafe at his long inaction in the Holy Land, and had a longing +for his old life of active employment; and, at the suggestion +probably of Hartington, and perhaps also of Northbrook, with whom +Gordon was in occasional correspondence, Lord Granville, so we are +informed by Fitzmaurice, wrote to Gladstone, 27th November: “Do you +see any objection to using Gordon in some way? He has an immense +name in Egypt, he is popular at home, he is a strong but very +sensible opponent of slavery, he has a small bee in his bonnet. If +you do not object I could consult Baring by telegraph.” To this +Gladstone consented, and the telegram, which appears in the Blue +Books, was dispatched to Cromer, 1st December: “If General Charles +Gordon were willing to go to Egypt would he be of any use to you or +to the Egyptian Government, and if so in what capacity?” Cromer, +however, without ceremony refused the offer. He explains in “Modern +Egypt” that his real reason for refusing was that he knew Gordon to +be an entirely unfit person for the task, and that the<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_151">[151]</span> reason he gave at the time of +the Egyptian Government’s being unwilling to send a Christian to +Khartoum, in view of the religious feeling there, was not the true +one; and he proceeds to give his reasons, founded on his knowledge +of Gordon’s character, for his belief in the unfitness, though he +says nothing of their personal quarrel in 1878, or of the +ill-relations in past years between Gordon and Tewfik.</p> + +<p>It is certain all the same that Gordon’s status as a Christian +was a perfectly sound reason with Sherif for refusing his +appointment, as Gordon himself discovered when it was too late, +three months afterwards. And I cannot help suspecting that the +whole plea of personal “unfitness,” put forward in “Modern Egypt,” +has been an afterthought on Cromer’s part, devised to screen his +own share in Gordon’s mission and its failure. That Cromer and +Gordon were personally antipathetic we know. But, except as a +Christian, it is nonsense to talk of Gordon as an “unfit” person +for such a duty as was then proposed. It had not at that time been +as yet decided that Khartoum was to be evacuated, and no Englishman +could have possibly been more fit than Gordon to hold it, if that +was possible, against the Mahdi, and restore the Khedive’s lost +authority. What Gordon was really unfit for, was to be the obedient +agent of a shifty and treacherous diplomacy, nominally a servant of +Egypt, but ready to execute any order of the British Agency at +Cairo, and to defend or betray his Egyptian employers at English +bidding. Cromer’s idea of loyalty and fitness for service in Egypt +was always that of loyalty to himself. Gordon’s was a quite +different idea. He held that an Englishman, accepting employment +and receiving pay from a foreign prince, was bound in honour to do +the best he could, not for his own country’s diplomatic +interests,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_152">[152]</span> but for +the advantage of the prince and people he served. If Cromer had +told us the whole of his thought in “Modern Egypt,” we should have +found it to be this, and that it was in this sense only, and of his +own personal dislike that his objection to Gordon on the ground of +“unfitness” must be understood.</p> + +<p>Still less is there any truth in what he goes on to say that at +this time, December 1883, his hand was forced about Gordon by the +London press, and especially the “Pall Mall Gazette”; for such is +the reverse of fact and easily disproved. Any one who will take the +trouble of looking through the files of the chief London newspapers +of that date will find hardly any mention in them at all of Gordon. +Indeed, the press seems to have been quite ignorant of the proposal +made regarding him. During the whole of that year, 1883, Gordon had +been all but ignored by the English public; and, with the exception +of two “headed articles” in the “Times,” written early in the year +while Dufferin was still considering the appointment of Hicks, and +one or two references to Gordon in the “St. James’s Gazette,” I can +find absolutely nothing about him. As to the “Pall Mall,” that +paper was on all matters where Egypt was concerned run strictly on +Gladstonian lines, advocating the evacuation of the country at the +earliest possible date, and with regard to the Soudan complete +abstention. All the earlier part of the year Morley had been still +its editor; and he, having experienced a revulsion of feeling in +regard to the attitude his paper had taken in bringing about the +war of 1882, was now in a mood of anti-Imperialist repentance, nor +had the “Pall Mall” changed its tone when Morley, having entered +Parliament, left his desk in Northumberland Street at the end of +August.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_153">[153]</span>William Stead, +the new editor, who four months later was to run Gordon for the +Soudan, and be the chief advocate of accepting responsibility in +Egypt, was still in October reproving the Tory press for this very +advocacy, and indignant with the “Times” for its protest against +the withdrawal of the troops. As to Gordon, the only mention of him +is one rather of depreciation, written at the time of the first +news of Hicks’ defeat, and the article might have emanated from the +pen of Lord Cromer himself; “Sir Samuel Baker,” says Stead in a +leading article, 20th November, on the disaster in Kordofan, +“fought and conquered in the same region, and it was also the scene +of the labours of Colonel Gordon, but although we should have +lamented the fate of either of these daring adventurers, no one +dreamed that their defeat and death would have entailed any +responsibility upon the English Government. The fact that since +Gordon’s resignation we have occupied the Delta makes no difference +in our relation to the officers in command of the Egyptian forces +in the Soudan. Whether Hicks falls, or whether he conquers is not +our business. <em>Not a single British soldier will be ordered to +Khartoum if the Mahdi were to rout the whole force under the orders +of the Khedive’s officers</em>. . . . The question arises whether +Sir E. Baring ought not to tell the Egyptian Government that this +kind of folly has gone on long enough, and that there would be no +chance of the re-establishment of its prestige, credit, and +independence, until its ambition in the Soudan is restricted within +a manageable compass.”</p> + +<p>This article, be it noted, was published just a week before +Granville’s proposal to send Gordon, and, while it stands in +strange contrast with Stead’s pronouncements of two and three +months later, it<span class="pagenum" id="Page_154">[154]</span> +contradicts absolutely Lord Cromer’s excuse that the sending of +Gordon was forced on the Government by Stead. It is a mere juggling +with the issue to shift the date of the pressure exercised by the +press in January and February, 1884, back to November and December +1883. I will return to this matter of the “Pall Mall” and the +London press later. What is of more historical importance is to +show, as can easily be done by a reference to the Blue Books and to +his own avowals, that Cromer, in spite of his attempt to shift the +responsibility of the Gordon mission from his own on to the back of +the London public, was himself, in all but the individual choice of +Gordon as its instrument, the responsible proposer of the mission. +The facts are these:</p> + +<p>Lord Cromer tells us that his first anxiety about Hicks and the +Soudan was in consequence of a talk with Giegler Pasha on 19th +November, the day before the article last quoted. Giegler seems to +have infected Cromer with something of the panic at that time +beginning to prevail at Khartoum; and, taking as he did a purely +financial view of the situation, he straightway telegraphed to +Granville that, if Hicks should be beaten, “the wisest course for +the Egyptian Government to adopt would be to accept defeat and fall +back on whatever point of the Nile they could hold with +confidence.” There is nothing, however, to show that at that time +he meant more by this advice than to repeat Dufferin’s +recommendation of a withdrawal from the southern and western +provinces, and a concentration on Khartoum and Suakin. Indeed I +think it is pretty clear that it was so understood at the Foreign +Office when Granville the next day replied, “If consulted, +recommend the abandonment of the Soudan <em>within certain +limits</em>.” It was then that the idea of Gordon’s<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_155">[155]</span> being sent was suggested; and +certainly if an Englishman was to go in order to carry out the +abandonment Gordon was the obvious man. There was, indeed, nobody +else to do it with anything like as good a chance of success. The +only English officer then at Khartoum was Colonel Coetlogon, an +acknowledged incapable, who had telegraphed that Khartoum could not +hold out two months against the Mahdi, while Gordon, though not +dispatched till January, and though ultimately unsuccessful, +managed by his great energy and military genius to keep the +Egyptian flag flying at Khartoum for nearly twelve months after +Coetlogon’s date. Yet Cromer in his “Modern Egypt” says he judged +Gordon for this purpose, “an unfit person.” The next stage in the +affair is that, the panic at Khartoum still continuing, Cromer on +the 3rd December writes a long dispatch, still under the influence +of the panic, recommending a withdrawal of the Egyptian garrisons, +not only to Khartoum or Berber, but even as far as to Wady Halfa, +thus abandoning the Soudan in its entirety. It was probably +Coetlogon’s continued telegrams that suggested it, and the +unwillingness of the English Government to give any material +assistance. And to this proposal Granville, on 13th December, at +once assents, explaining that all the English Government is +prepared to do is to “assist in maintaining order in Egypt proper, +and in defending it as well as the ports in the Red Sea.”</p> + +<p>By the 22nd December, however, we find Cromer in a different +mood. He had found the Egyptian Government unable to “agree to the +abandonment of the territories which they consider absolutely +necessary for the security and even for the existence itself” of +Egypt, and they were for invoking the aid of the Sultan and of +Turkish troops. Moreover, the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_156">[156]</span> reports from Khartoum had begun to be less +alarming; the Mahdi had not advanced to attack the place, and was +lingering on at El Obeyd. Although Cromer does not say so precisely +in his despatch of that date (22nd December), it is easy to read +between the lines of it that the idea had occurred to him that, +while insisting upon the abandonment of the whole Soudan by Egypt, +it might be possible not to surrender it to the Mahdi, but to build +up some other form of native self-government, under English +direction at Khartoum, which should constitute a semi-civilized +buffer state between Egypt and the Mahdi’s fanatical rule. The idea +of this is to be found in the last sentences of his despatch, +where, after recounting the difficulties attendant on the proposed +withdrawal and the objections raised by Sherif Pasha, he goes on, +in contradiction of his first alarmist dispatches: “The immediate +position is not, I think, so alarming as appears to be thought in +England. Dissensions seem to be rife among the tribes of the +Soudan, some of the most important being opposed to the Mahdi. It +is quite possible that by a judicious expenditure of money and by +good management the Government of the Khedive may succeed in +maintaining its authority northwards from Khartoum. They will not, +however, be able to hold that country except on sufferance, and I +believe them to be perfectly incapable of governing it properly.” +Therefore they must be coerced into abandoning it, and he asks for +power to coerce them. “The only way,” he says, “in which it can be +carried out, will be for me to inform the Khedive that Her +Majesty’s Government insist on the adoption of this course, and +that if his present Ministers will not carry out the policy others +must be named who will consent to do so.” Then he adds, disclosing +here his thought: “<em>It would also<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_157">[157]</span> be necessary to send an English officer of +high authority to Khartoum with full power to withdraw the +garrisons and to make the best arrangements possible for the future +government of that country</em>.”</p> + +<p>I recommend this dispatch to the renewed attention of +historians, for in it lies not only the demand for new absolute +powers to be undertaken by England in Egypt, but also in regard to +the Soudan, the germ of that claim, afterwards enforced upon the +Khedive in 1899, that Egypt should abandon the Soudan, leaving it +to England to decide what later should be its status. The Egyptian +Government was to withdraw its troops, but “an English officer of +high authority” was to be sent to Khartoum, not only to insist upon +the withdrawal, but also to provide the Soudan with a new +government. One cannot help thinking that Cromer may have already +contemplated what he afterwards carried out, the appropriation of +the great Nile provinces to England herself.</p> + +<p>At any rate it is quite certain that we see in this dispatch of +22nd December clearly set forth what was to be the Gordon mission, +though Gordon himself is not named in it. An English officer was to +go to Khartoum not only to bring away the garrison, as was +afterwards pretended, but to re-establish order and set up a new +political regime. It is characteristic of Cromer’s lack of scruple +as a historian that, in order to evade admitting his initial +responsibility for the mission and for its failure, he should have +omitted, in quoting the concluding sentence of this dispatch in +“Modern Egypt,” the essential word “English,” and should have +altered it into “an officer of high authority,” thereby enabling +him to make it appear that it was not Gordon or any Englishman, but +an Egyptian officer he had in his mind when<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_158">[158]</span> writing it. The omission can hardly have +been an accident in a passage so important. Yet none of his critics +so far have noticed the manœuvre.<a id="FNanchor_21"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_21" class="fnanchor">[21]</a></p> + +<p>This brings us to the end of the year 1883, and almost to the +date, 7th January 1884, of Gordon’s arrival from Palestine in +England; and again I beg the attention of historians to what I am +now going to say.</p> + +<p>The particular choice of Gordon for the mission Cromer had +proposed, though as we have seen his name had been more than once +talked of at the Foreign Office, would probably never have been +actually made and insisted on but for a combination of chances +closely connected with a Cabinet intrigue just then coming to a +head in London. Down to the end of the year 1883 nobody was +thinking at all of Gordon in connection with actual circumstances +in the Soudan, nor was anything known of Cromer’s proposal. Gordon +had been away close on a year in Palestine, and had kept silence, +an unusual thing with him, during the whole of it as far as the +press was concerned. Not a dozen persons in England knew of his +being on his way back to Europe, and his few friends at +head-quarters looked upon him as being engaged to King Leopold for +service on the Congo, and so out of the question for Khartoum—this +although they knew also that the idea of the Soudan was once more +present to his mind, since the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_159">[159]</span> defeat of Hicks, as a possibility and a +temptation for his ambition. He had written to Wolseley to get him +leave at the War Office to enter Leopold’s service, and on landing +at Genoa had gone straight to Brussels, there to arrange terms with +the King about the Congo. Except for a few reviews of Hake’s book +“Chinese Gordon,” which had been published at Christmas time, I can +find nothing about him in any of the London newspapers. And so +things stood at the end of the year.</p> + +<p>It would be a curious matter to speculate what might have been +the respective fates of the Nile population and those of the Congo +if Gordon’s contract, then all but signed, with Leopold had been +carried into effect. It would probably have been for the welfare, +or, let us say, the lesser suffering of both. It is difficult to +think of the Congo venture taking the inhuman shape it did had +Gordon ever had personally to do with it, and had he been left +alive to protest against a violation of human rights so monstrous; +while, on the other hand, the Egyptian Soudan might have been +spared the destruction of four-fifths of its inhabitants at the +blundering hands of our Government, and its present melancholy +subjection to European rule. Chance, however, or whatever directs +the destinies for good and evil in the world, ruled it otherwise, +and Gordon, turned aside from the Congo, was to meet his fate, not +there, but upon the Upper Nile, while the Congo was to become the +scene of still greater horrors. Whose the hands were exactly that +pulled the strings in the affair and sent him to his doom, and what +was the relative amount of responsibility assignable to each of the +chief actors, with the mystery of their secret motives, I have been +at great pains to ascertain. This is how the thing, when carefully +examined, appears to have come about.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_160">[160]</span>Gordon’s return +to Europe, as I have said, coincided very exactly with a crisis +both in London and at Cairo closely connected with the mission he +was a few days later to be entrusted with. Gladstone’s Cabinet had, +at Cromer’s suggestion, agreed that the Khedive’s Government should +be advised to evacuate the whole Soudan as far north as Wady Halfa, +and the Khedive and Sherif Pasha, his Prime Minister, had refused, +and Cromer had asked permission to add threats to advice, and to +insist upon the advice being taken. The request involved an entire +change in Gladstone’s Egyptian policy, which had, so far, been to +assume a minimum of governing responsibility in Egypt proper, and +none at all in the Soudan. On this point, however, he no longer +could count upon a clear majority in his Cabinet, and parties +within it were so evenly balanced that, as is usual in such cases, +the London press was being called in to add weight to opinion on +either side.</p> + +<p>Moreover, the press being largely in the hands of capitalists +and City financiers, it was happening, as is also usual in such +cases, that the balance of journalistic opinion, directly it came +to understand the position in the Cabinet, was as largely on the +side where money interests were involved. These lay strongly with +the continuation of the British occupation of Egypt, and with the +undertaking by England, where the chance should be given, of new +responsibilities. The house of Rothschild still held half the +Domains Loan of £9,000,000 in its own hands, and the “Times” was +its obedient organ. It needed therefore only a slight impulse from +the War Office, which was the head-quarters of the faction opposed +to Gladstone, to set the press in motion on the Soudan question; +and on the first day of the year 1884, we find the “Times” +publishing a strong letter<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_161">[161]</span> from Sir Samuel Baker protesting against +the abandonment of the Soudan by civilization, and urging the +employment of British or Indian troops for the purpose of +recovering it from the Mahdi. It was a powerful letter, and we find +it supported by a leading article, as strongly recommending the +assumption of full authority by England at Cairo and citing with +regard to the Soudan the Dufferin recommendation of the year +before, namely that, while Darfour and Kordofan might be abandoned, +Khartoum and the northern and eastern provinces should be retained, +that troops should be sent to Assouan, and that communication with +the Red Sea should be reopened by the construction of a railway +from Berber to Souakin. This was not only the Dufferin but also the +Gordon policy, as was well known both to Samuel Baker and to those +who inspired the “Times.” Baker was interested in the Soudan both +by his former connection with it and by the fact that his brother +Valentine (Baker Pasha) had just been ordered to Souakin to defend +the Red Sea coast against Osman Digna the new Mahdist leader. In +Baker’s letter to the “Times” occurs the first public suggestion I +can find of Gordon’s being employed by the Government to solve the +difficulty at Khartoum. It is not repeated in the “Times” article, +nor is it more than a question “Why should not General Gordon Pasha +be invited to assist the Government?”</p> + +<p>Two days later, a Cabinet meeting being about to be held where +the fate of the new policy of Egypt was to be decided, we find the +“Pall Mall Gazette” yielding to the same influence and announcing +its sudden conversion from the evacuationist Gladstonian view of +Egyptian policy, of which it had been so stout and consistent a +supporter, to that of Gladstone’s political opponents in the +Cabinet. It<span class="pagenum" id="Page_162">[162]</span> opened +its campaign by publishing the first of a series of leading +articles on the crisis, issued on consecutive days and headed +respectively, “Facing a Crisis,” “The Alternatives,” “Downing +Street and Cairo,” and “The Drift of Events in Egypt.” All were +sensational articles, and all in favour of the full authority in +Egypt Cromer was demanding, namely, that of enabling him to coerce +the Khedive, take the supreme power at Cairo into his own hands and +assume sole responsibility in regard to the Soudan.</p> + +<p>No one, I think, with any knowledge of journalism can doubt that +a conversion so sudden and so violent can have been due to anything +less than a Ministerial hint of the very directest kind. The +decision of the Cabinet to undertake the new responsibility at +Cairo was come to on the 3rd January, the date of the first “Pall +Mall Gazette” article, but it was not known to the general public +till the 7th, the date of the fourth article, and so must have been +the result of private information from within the Cabinet, probably +from the War Office and communicated by Brett, who was Hartington’s +private secretary and his usual intermediary with the press, +besides being an old member of the “Pall Mall” staff.<a id= +"FNanchor_22"></a><a href="#Footnote_22" class="fnanchor">[22]</a> +There is, however, as yet no mention in any of the “Pall Mall +Gazette” articles of Gordon, nor can I find his name in any London +paper except in the one phrase I have quoted from the “Times,” +during that first week of the year, the reason doubtless being that +Gordon’s few friends knew that on landing at Genoa he had gone +straight to Brussels, <em>en route</em> for the Congo. The only +allusion to Gordon in the “Pall Mall Gazette” of that week is not +in the articles, but in an “occasional note,” and again in the +form<span class="pagenum" id="Page_163">[163]</span> of a query, +“Chinese Gordon is to undertake the administration of the Congo. . +. . Is it not a pity that at a time when so much other work is +urgently wanting to be done in Egypt and elsewhere the ablest +leader of irregular forces England has produced should be told off +to the service of an International Association amid the swamps of +the Congo?”</p> + +<p>This was all that had been said about Gordon before his arrival +at Southampton on the 7th. He had spent the best part of the week +at Brussels before proceeding to England, and had found there on +2nd January a communication awaiting him from Wolseley, with whom +he had been in correspondence, telling him that the permission he +had asked for at the War Office to take service under King Leopold +was refused him by the British Government. This had brought him in +haste to England, and he had arrived at his sister’s house at +Southampton so angry about the refusal that his first act had been +to sign and send in his papers to the War Office resigning his +commission in Her Majesty’s army. His brother Sir Henry tells us +that the refusal was “more a Foreign Office than a War Office +question, and the refusal emanated from the former.” Gordon took it +to be due to a Foreign Office prepossession against him. It is +possible, however, to read the refusal in another sense, and that +Granville, who had already once proposed him to Cromer, and who was +considering Cromer’s demand for an English officer, still wished to +retain a hold over Gordon for the contingency of his being required +at Khartoum; and this is how I am inclined to interpret it. It is +difficult indeed to understand it otherwise, seeing that the +Foreign Office must have just then received Cromer’s telegram +asking for an officer to carry out a duty<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_164">[164]</span> precisely such as Gordon was most fitted, +indeed the only man fitted, to perform.</p> + +<p>For these reasons, too, I refuse to accept as entirely reliable +Mr. Stead’s claim to absolute independence of official inspiration +in the matter of his celebrated interview with Gordon at +Southampton, which took place on the day following the general’s +arrival there. Mr. Stead’s genius may very well have conceived the +idea of the visit as the particular form in which Gordon was to be +advertised; but in view of the series of articles just alluded to, +and knowing as I do the ways of journalism and the close connection +there was that year between the “Pall Mall Gazette” and the War +Office through Lord Esher, and having, moreover, been myself more +than once interviewed by Mr. Stead, I find it impossible not to +recognize in the sudden entrance of Gordon into the intrigue one of +those manœuvres worked from time to time in the “Pall Mall” columns +through Lord Esher’s agency.</p> + +<p>We know from Fitzmaurice’s “Life of Granville” that the +antagonism between Hartington and Gladstone did actually exist at +the time, and that it had just then reached a critical stage; and +we know that Hartington, as Secretary for War, must have been the +Minister to whom the choice of an officer for Khartoum had been +referred, and who, in fact, did a few days later decide it, and we +know Lord Esher’s position at the War Office, and we know his +connection with the “Pall Mall Gazette.” Lord Esher was Gordon’s +friend, Mr. Stead at the time was not. Lord Esher was conversant +with his movements, with his application for leave to serve King +Leopold, with the refusal of his leave, and I decline to believe +that there was no hint given on which Mr. Stead acted. In every +newspaper office there are scores of<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_165">[165]</span> such journalistic secrets never divulged +and easily forgotten, and it seems to me vastly more probable that +the Gordon “boom” was one of them.</p> + +<p>What is quite certain is that, from the moment of the +publication of the interview, the “Pall Mall” became avowedly the +organ of that section of the Cabinet which was working for +intervention in the Soudan, if necessary, by force of arms. If any +one doubts this he needs to go no further than to the files of the +“Pall Mall” for proof. There is among the rest a perfectly plain +confession of the fact in a leading article of 14th February, where +Stead thus excuses himself as the Liberal editor of a Liberal +journal for his advocacy of the Gordon mission at a time when many +Liberals were far from approving it. “From a mere party point of +view,” Stead writes, “it is often the most useful thing a true +Liberal can do to oppose the immediate policy of his party, for it +is only by that means that he can secure the adoption of the policy +which will give victory to his own side. <em>Cabinets, it must +never be forgotten, are composite bodies, and the outsider who +advocates a new departure is often the exponent of the views of +those who in the secrecy of the council chamber have been hitherto +unsuccessfully striving for the policy</em> that makes for +righteousness and peace. There are times when the most loyal +followers may find it necessary to indicate to his leaders the path +of safety which they may hitherto have been too preoccupied to +perceive or too evenly divided to adopt.” The whole passage, and +especially those words which I have italicized, is a very candid +avowal of the position of things as between the “Pall Mall Gazette” +and the section of the Cabinet represented by Hartington, and it +was explained to me in this way on my return to England by those in +a position to know.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_166">[166]</span>With regard to +the interview itself, perhaps the most important part of it in this +regard are the phrases used in the leading article recommending the +interview. It is a repetition and amplification of the question put +by Sir Samuel Baker in his “Times” letter of a week before. “Why +not,” asks Stead, “send Chinese Gordon with full powers to Khartoum +to assume absolute control of the territory, to relieve the +garrisons, and do what can be done to save what can be saved from +the wreck in the Soudan? . . . No one can deny the urgent need in +the midst of that hideous welter of confusion for the presence of +such a man with a born genius for command and unexampled capacity +for organizing ever-victorious armies and a perfect knowledge of +the Soudan and its people. Why not send him out with <em>carte +blanche</em> to do the best that can be done?”</p> + +<p>Here we have the Gordon mission exactly as it was sent, in fact +if not nominally, by Her Majesty’s ministers nine days later, +almost exactly as it had been proposed by Cromer in December, +namely, the sending of “an English officer of high authority to +Khartoum with full power to withdraw the garrisons and to make the +best arrangements possible for the future government of that +country.” Seeing that nothing as yet was known outside the public +offices of Cromer’s dispatch or of his having made any such demand, +and the extreme improbability of an identity of ideas between Stead +and Cromer by mere journalistic inspiration, I think we may fairly +conclude that the description by Stead of what Gordon was to effect +at Khartoum was due to a War Office suggestion rather than mere +accident. At any rate, it is absurd that Cromer, of all persons, +should complain as he does in his “Modern Egypt” of the idea of the +mission having<span class="pagenum" id="Page_167">[167]</span> been +forced upon him by the “Pall Mall Gazette.” All that can fairly be +said is that Stead, having got an inkling that such a mission had +been demanded, put the dots promptly and powerfully on the +<em>i</em>’s and named the only man capable of carrying it out +effectually. It is difficult indeed to understand, notwithstanding +all we know of Cromer’s dislike of Gordon and his recent +protestations, that Gordon was absent from his mind when he penned +his telegram of 22nd December. Lord Cromer has a convenient way of +forgetting things when it suits him to forget, and it has probably +suited him to forget this among the rest. At any rate, it is +impossible to suggest another name.</p> + +<p>Neither, I think, can it be pretended that Stead’s +recommendation of Gordon for the post was so potent and +instantaneous an influence at the Foreign Office as to have forced +Granville’s hand unless Granville had been already willing. Between +the publication of the “Pall Mall” interview and Lord Granville’s +second proposal to Cromer of sending Gordon there was an interval +of less than twenty-four hours, and it is far more likely that +those in the Cabinet who wanted to send Gordon should have made use +of Stead to popularize their plan than that Stead should have been +able by his few words, however powerful, so suddenly to force it on +them. Gordon’s views, publicly and forcibly stated in the “Pall +Mall Gazette,” may possibly have quickened the pace, and this is +all that can reasonably be affirmed about it. The real object of +the press campaign of the past week, it is essential to understand, +had been to force not Granville’s hand, but Gladstone’s. Granville +needed no convincing. He was already of the Hartington faction in +regard to Egypt. But Gladstone, it was known, would be difficult to +persuade. Gladstone,<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_168">[168]</span> unlike the rest, really wanted to get out +of Egypt, he really wanted to have nothing to do with the Soudan, +and he had only consented to the new responsibility undertaken at +Cairo a fortnight before of making and unmaking ministries on its +being explained to him that thus alone could he escape being +involved in the further responsibility of Khartoum. It was +necessary now to force his hand to the idea of sending up an +“English officer of high authority” not only to withdraw the +garrisons, but also to stay on at Khartoum and to “arrange a future +government.” Gladstone could hardly be made to swallow this second +dose of responsibility, except through pressure from outside the +Cabinet, the pressure of public opinion, and this it was that was +put upon him by Hartington through Stead and the magic of Gordon’s +name. The “Pall Mall Gazette” had more than once been used to +coerce Gladstone. It was the paper that he chiefly read.<a id= +"FNanchor_23"></a><a href="#Footnote_23" class= +"fnanchor">[23]</a></p> + +<p>Granville’s position was quite different. It was an intermediate +one between Gladstone’s and Hartington’s. A Whig by birth and +tradition and, as Foreign Secretary in 1881-82, the member of the +Cabinet most directly concerned in the aggression on Egypt, he +needed no conversion at all to the idea of remaining on at Cairo or +of a further commitment to responsibility in the Soudan, and he was +certainly at one with Hartington on these points; but, on the other +hand, Gladstone was his chief, with whom he could not afford to +quarrel. He was poor and in debt, and dependent on Gladstone for +his continuance in office. What made him of value in the Cabinet +was his amiability. He was friends with both factions,<a id= +"FNanchor_24"></a><a href="#Footnote_24" class="fnanchor">[24]</a> +and was used by them both as go-between. In the present instance it +was<span class="pagenum" id="Page_169">[169]</span> necessary to +get Gladstone to go with Hartington the way the Whigs wanted. They +had used the press, and precisely the “Pall Mall Gazette” under +Morley, against him in the spring of 1882 when they wanted his +consent for the sending of the fleet to bombard Alexandria. They +were using the same “Pall Mall Gazette” under Stead now that they +wanted his consent to the sending of an “English officer” to +Sarawak the Soudan. They had pretended to Gladstone in 1882 that +the mission of the fleet would be one of moral pressure only, to +protect British subjects, and give moral support to the Khedive—no +actual firing of guns, nothing at all like an armed intervention in +Egypt, still less like a permanent occupation. They pretended to +him now that Gordon’s mission was to be an entirely peaceful one, a +tour of inspection, to withdraw the garrisons by peaceable means +and return at once in a few weeks. Of course it was nothing really +of the sort; it could not really be anything of the sort, and they +knew it; it was to arrange a new government at Khartoum, and this +could only be done by reorganizing a fighting force under +Englishmen, and thus indirectly by an English occupation of Egypt +indefinitely prolonged.</p> + +<p>Any one who will take the trouble to go through all the +documents of the case with an open mind will, I think, inevitably +agree with this reading of the facts. It is the only one that +accounts rationally for Gladstone’s position afterwards or for that +of any one of those principally concerned. Morley, in his “Life of +Gladstone,” would have one believe that Granville and Hartington, +and Dilke and Northbrook, four level-headed English politicians, at +least as much rogues politically as fools, went suddenly mad on +Stead’s persuading them that Gordon was a miracle<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_170">[170]</span> man. Cabinet Ministers, +however, do not go mad in this way; their madnesses have much more +method than that. Nor are they thus carried off their legs in +twenty-four hours by a newspaper interview. It is they that inspire +the newspapers, not the newspapers them; and, though Heaven knows +they are guided at times by little enough wisdom, it is seldom to +the press they go for their folly, especially at the Foreign +Office. For the rest of the situation it is necessary to consider +that Granville does not seem to have understood all when on the +9th, the evening of the day after Stead’s interview was published, +he telegraphed to Cromer, “Would General Charles Gordon or Sir +Charles Wilson be of assistance under altered circumstances in +Egypt?”—the “altered circumstances” being of course Cromer’s +assumption of all power. Stead’s <em>ballon d’essai</em> had been +well received in London by the morning papers, and Granville +doubtless felt surer of his ground with Gladstone. The +circumstances, however, had not been favourable to either Gordon or +Wilson. Nubar hated Gordon, and the Khedive hated Wilson, who had +baulked him in his intention of hanging Arabi;<a id= +"FNanchor_25"></a><a href="#Footnote_25" class="fnanchor">[25]</a> +and Cromer, who only wanted now an obedient agent at the end of a +wire, and who knew Gordon was not the man implicitly to obey any of +them, willingly joined Nubar and the Khedive in their refusal. Once +more, therefore, Gordon was found to be “quite unfit,” and Cromer’s +reply, 12th January, was, “I have consulted Nubar Pasha and I do +not think that the services of General Gordon or Sir Charles Wilson +can be utilized at present.”</p> + +<p>Cromer in his “Modern Egypt” says that the man they had in view +then was after all no Englishman, but an Egyptian, Abd-el-Kader +Pasha, an excellent man<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_171">[171]</span> doubtless for a job in the Soudan, but he +does not explain Nubar’s objection to Gordon, and in order to avoid +the difficulty of doing so, and of reconciling his refusal of +either Englishman now offered him with his special request a few +weeks before for an English officer, he drops, as we have seen, the +word “English” out of his earlier telegram. The attempt to get +Abd-el-Kader to undertake their work occupied another several more +days in the final decision, and it was not till Gladstone’s and +Cromer’s and Nubar’s consent had all been obtained, by the 16th, +that the actual sending on the 18th was carried into effect. How +this was engineered in London, and on what conditions, we will now +examine, following Gordon’s steps from day to day in accordance +with his recorded movements.</p> + +<p>Stead’s interview with Gordon took place at Southampton on the +8th January, and was published on the afternoon of the 9th. It +reached Gordon at Southampton on the morning of the 10th, and had +on him a very disturbing influence. In the interview itself he had +been careful not to suggest that he was himself willing to +undertake the task proposed to him; on the contrary, he had +suggested Sir Samuel Baker as the proper man for it. He looked upon +the Soudan as a temptation to vain glory, and Stead’s suddenly +thrusting him forward into the glare of publicity as a candidate +for the duty troubled his conscience. In his heart he was tempted +to go, if only the Government would send him, yet it was what he +called his “Agag,” the thing he must “hew in pieces,” his besetting +sin of “hailing the tram of the world.” It was in this double mood +that he fled the same evening to the vicarage of his religious +friend, Dr. Barnes, at Heavitree, near Exeter, there to take +spiritual counsel, and also to see Baker, who<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_172">[172]</span> lived in the neighbourhood, and consult +with him as to what was to be done. Barnes’ story of this visit is +brief, but enlightening and most characteristic of the man Gordon +was. The worthy vicar thus records it:</p> + +<p>“He [Gordon] found time to spend a night at Heavitree Vicarage, +and on the morning of Friday the 11th of January, he received Holy +Communion in the parish church. This, so far as I can trace his +course, was, with one exception, his last communion. On the same +morning he visited Bishop Temple, with whom, as we have seen from a +letter already quoted, he had wished to ‘talk about those +things’—the only things which seemed to him to be of really vital +interest and importance.</p> + +<p>“Later in the day he went on to Sandford Orleigh, Sir Samuel +Baker’s house; and to those who accompanied him it was pleasant to +see the meeting between the two ex-governors of the Soudan. While +we were driving from Newton Abbot Station to Sandford Orleigh, Sir +Samuel Baker pressed on Gordon the expediency of his again going to +the Soudan as Governor-General, if Her Majesty’s Government should +require it. Gordon was silent, but his eyes flashed, and an eager +expression passed over his face as he looked at his host. Late at +night, when we had retired, he came to my room, and said in a soft +voice, ‘You saw me to-day?’ ‘You mean in the carriage?’ ‘Yes; you +saw <em>me</em>—that was <em>myself</em>—the self I want to get rid +of.’”</p> + +<p>The same evening he wrote a letter to Baker—it was probably +agreed between them that he should do so—in which he again urged +Baker to accept the task, and gave him his idea of what would be +necessary for successfully carrying it out. This letter Baker sent +to the “Times,” and it appeared in that paper<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_173">[173]</span> on the morning of the 14th. We will +return to what he said in it later, when we consider precisely what +those who sent him on his mission intended him to do. It had the +effect of causing Granville to write that same day privately (note +the humanitarian appeal) to Gladstone: “If Gordon says he believes +he could by his personal influence excite the tribes to escort the +Khartoum garrison and inhabitants to Suakin, a little pressure on +Baring might be advisable. The destruction of these poor people +would be a great disaster.” Also on the morning of the 15th, +Gladstone’s consent having been obtained, Wolseley, who had already +sent for Gordon, was commissioned to sound him as to his +willingness to go, and found him to be so under certain +conditions.</p> + +<p>What these were, and what exactly passed between the two on the +15th, it is very difficult to disentangle from the conflicting +evidence, for little of it was put in writing at the time, and the +chief testimony regarding it rests upon the recollections of +persons, or rather of partisans, all concerned in excusing +themselves many years after the event. Thus Lord Esher (Brett) +tells us that on that occasion, besides Wolseley, Gordon saw +Hartington and Granville, but I think there must be some confusion +of memory here in which the interview of the 15th has been mixed up +with that of three days later, the 18th. Esher’s words are: “In +January 1884, after his interviews with Lord Hartington and Lord +Granville, Gordon came for the last time to Tilney Street. He was +leaving for Brussels. I can see him now with his muffler and his +warm coat walking about the nursery with my eldest son in his +arms.” Now Gordon, in a letter from Brussels dated the 17th, says: +“Brocklehurst is here with me. Government and authorities have been +exceedingly kind and I have<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_174">[174]</span> every reason to be grateful to them for I +have often worried them and they have decided to let me stay on in +H. M. S. (Service?).” This, as Brett was certainly in the best +position to know, would seem conclusive as to the date, for Gordon +left for Brussels the next morning, the 16th, but I feel sure that +the visit described at Tilney Street was on the 18th, when Gordon +certainly saw both Hartington and Granville. About the 15th, +writing soon after the event, Sir Henry Gordon says very clearly, +“on the 15th January General Gordon came up to London in accordance +with a telegram from Lord Wolseley and had an interview with him of +over two hours, during which time although Lord Wolseley saw some +members of the Cabinet General Gordon did not.” And Sir Henry goes +on to say that his brother that same evening came to dine with him, +and next morning went with Brocklehurst to Brussels. As to what +took place between Wolseley and Gordon, nothing very precisely is +known, as Gordon seems to have kept his own counsel about it. +Fitzmaurice says briefly: “Lord Wolseley met General Gordon, then +on his way to Brussels, and discussed the situation in Egypt with +him. Having asked the General what under the circumstances of the +hour he would do, Lord Wolseley received the reply ‘I would send +myself.’ The brief conversation suggested that General Gordon, +stirred by the thought of the threatened collapse of the edifice +which he had helped to raise, through the very dangers he had +foreseen, and believing that he alone was the man of the situation, +was prepared to cancel his existing engagements and return to the +Soudan.”</p> + +<p>The text of Granville’s telegram of the same evening to Cromer, +using the gentle pressure which<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_175">[175]</span> Gladstone had agreed to, is given in +“Modern Egypt,” dispatched, doubtless, on Wolseley’s report of the +conversation. “I hear indirectly that Gordon is ready to go +straight to Suakin without passing through Cairo on the following +rather vague terms, his mission to be to report to Her Majesty’s +Government on the military situation in the Soudan and to return +without any further engagement towards him. He would be under you +for instructions and will send letters through you under flying +seal. You and Nubar Pasha to give him all assistance and facilities +as to telegraphing, etc. Egyptian Government to send Ibrahim Fowzi +to meet him at Suez with a writer to attend on him. He might be of +use in informing you and us of the situation. It would be popular +at home but there may be countervailing objections. Tell me your +real opinion with or without Nubar Pasha.” The word “indirectly” +would seem to mean that Granville had not himself seen Gordon that +day. The phrase about the mission being to “report” only seems to +have been the gentle way of putting things calculated to gain +Cromer’s acquiescence, and it is on this initial account of the +mission communicated also to Gladstone, with the design to allay +his suspicions as well, that the legend was based to which +Gladstone always adhered, that Gordon had received no other +instructions, and had disobeyed them by understanding that they +covered wider ground. It is quite impossible, however, that this +should have been all that passed between Wolseley and Gordon during +the two hours their conference had lasted, or that it was in this +sense that Gordon understood the proposal made to him by the War +Office. Gordon’s letter to Baker had been published the morning of +the day before in the “Times,” and it was very explicit about what +ought<span class="pagenum" id="Page_176">[176]</span> to be done in +the Soudan, and the minimum of outside support needed to accomplish +it successfully.</p> + +<p>Cromer, in his “Modern Egypt,” makes light of the interview with +Stead at Southampton as being only talk, but he cannot say the same +of the published letter which, according to his usual controversial +practice, he passes by in silence. Gordon in the interview had +declared in the plainest possible words not only that Khartoum +ought to and must be held against the Mahdi, but that the +evacuation of its garrison, with the garrisons of Darfur and the +Upper Nile, was a physical impossibility; he lays this down in +language as to which there can be no conceivable mistake: “Whatever +you decide about evacuation you cannot evacuate because your army +cannot be moved; you must either surrender absolutely to the Mahdi +or defend Khartoum at all hazards, the latter is the only course +which ought to be entertained. There is no serious difficulty about +it, the Mahdi’s forces will fall to pieces of themselves, but if in +a moment of panic orders are issued for the abandonment of the +whole of the Eastern Soudan, a blow will be struck against Egypt +and the peace of the East which may have fatal consequences. . . . +Nubar should be left untrammelled by any stipulations concerning +the evacuation of Khartoum; there is no hurry. The garrisons can +hold their own at present, let them continue to hold on until +disunion and tribal jealousies have worked their natural result in +the camp of the Mahdi. Nubar should be free to deal with the Soudan +in his own way. How he will deal with the Soudan I cannot profess +to say, but I should imagine that he would appoint a +Governor-General at Khartoum with full powers, and furnish him with +2,000,000 sterling. . . . Sir Samuel Baker might be appointed +Governor-General,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_177">[177]</span> +he might take his brother as Commander-in-Chief.” This was a strong +fighting policy, and, <em>mutatis mutandis</em>, precisely how he +afterwards understood his instructions. In his letter to Baker he +had been even more explicit. “To my mind,” he says, “patience and +diplomacy are far more needed than arms. Still to some degree you +must have the latter. . . . I would recommend (1) permission to be +got from the Sultan to engage 4,000 of his reserved troops, both +officers and men, which will be under your brother’s command, and +be volunteers with the promise of remuneration at the end of their +service; (2) that some 2,000 Belooches under the native officers +should be enlisted in India, who have been soldiers of Her Majesty, +old sturdy warriors; for your cavalry you can horse them in the +Hedjaz, Palestine, and Syria; (3) that Her Majesty’s Government +will allow you to purchase from Her Majesty animals, paying a +percentage upon all purchases; (4) that Her Majesty’s Government +should allow military store officers to aid you but not to go into +the field”—another fighting programme.</p> + +<p>With these two pronouncements of what was to be done hot before +them—and Hartington and Granville and Wolseley must all have read +them—it is ludicrous to suppose that the real object of the +mission, as it was certainly understood by Gordon, and afterwards, +to the best of his power, put in execution by him, was not +discussed between Gordon and Wolseley, or by Wolseley as go-between +with Hartington and Granville, or that these did not understand it +in an active sense. Cromer scouts the idea of Gordon having been +sent to him only to report, and in this Cromer is right. The talk +of reporting was only make-believe, gently to propitiate him, +Cromer, and to propitiate Gladstone; it never had<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_178">[178]</span> any reality. Hartington, +describing the mission some weeks later in the House of Commons, +while attempting to excuse the Government, admits that the mission +had a larger and more important scope than either reporting or a +withdrawal of the garrisons. “Gordon’s mission,” he says, 20th +February 1884, was “to attempt the rescue of 28,000 men contained +in Khartoum and the other portions of the Soudan, and not only +these garrisons, but also to make some arrangement for the better +government of those provinces.” He was clearly quoting Cromer’s +original words of the previous December, which had all along +remained the basis of the mission as understood by himself and his +own section of the Cabinet at the War Office.</p> + +<p>If Gordon was not sent at once on the 15th to Khartoum it was +because Cromer had not yet answered Granville’s latest telegram. +While waiting for it he consequently went back to Brussels to +excuse himself with King Leopold for breaking his Congo agreement. +The War Office had already refused to accept his resignation of his +commission, and on the 17th, Cromer and Nubar having capitulated on +the 16th declaring now that Gordon was the best man, Gordon was +telegraphed for and returned to London.<a id= +"FNanchor_26"></a><a href="#Footnote_26" class="fnanchor">[26]</a> +Here on the 18th the same process of interviewing took place at the +War Office; first, a talk between Gordon and Wolseley; then, in the +afternoon, with four members of the Cabinet, who had been hastily +got together, all of them members of the Hartington<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_179">[179]</span> faction and without Gladstone, +who was still away invalided at Hawarden. The discussion that day +seems to have been little more than formal, for Gordon was already +in his train by eight o’clock to catch the Brindisi mail for Egypt, +and the instructions had had to be drafted and written out and +signed at the Foreign Office, and a search made for Stewart, who +was to go with him, and good-byes to be said. Gordon was brought +into a room where the four Ministers, Hartington, Granville, Dilke, +and Northbrook,<a id="FNanchor_27"></a><a href="#Footnote_27" +class="fnanchor">[27]</a> were, and exchanged a few words with +them, and that seems to have been all. The whole of the details +clearly had been arranged with Wolseley. Gordon’s own account of +the interview is given in a letter he wrote to Barnes in the train, +and posted at Brindisi on the 22nd.</p> + +<p>“I saw Wolseley at 8 a.m. He said nothing was settled, but +Ministers would see me at 3.30 p.m. No one knew I had come back. At +noon he, Wolseley, came for me and took me to Ministers. He went in +and talked to the Ministers and came back and said: ‘Her Majesty’s +Government want you to understand<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_180">[180]</span> this—Government are determined to evacuate +Soudan, for they will not guarantee future government. Will you go +and do it?’ I said, ‘Yes.’ He said, ‘Go in.’ I went in and saw +them. They said, ‘Did Wolseley tell you our orders?’ I said, ‘Yes.’ +I said, ‘You will not guarantee future government of Soudan, and +you wish me to go up and evacuate now.’ I said ‘Yes,’ and it was +over, and I left at 8 p.m. for Calais. Very little passed between +us. The Duke [of Cambridge] and Wolseley came to see me off, so +that is over.”</p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_181">[181]</span><a id= +"c06"></a>CHAPTER VI</h2> + +<p class="sch1">WAS GORDON DISOBEDIENT?</p> + +<p class="dcap">IT is said that Gordon drafted his own instructions +at the Foreign Office, but I find it hard to believe this, for, if +true, it would go near to proving him as great a diplomatic rogue +as those who sent him. The instructions are a very crafty document. +They begin with a manifest insincerity about Gordon’s going to +Egypt “to report on the measures it may be advisable to take for +the security of the Egyptian garrisons and the European population +in Khartoum,” and he is also “to consider and report upon the best +mode of effecting the evacuation of the Interior and upon the +manner in which the safety and good administration of the Red Sea +Ports can be secured.” Then there is a paragraph about the slave +trade as manifestly insincere, introduced for the satisfaction of +the Anti-Slavery Association in London, and he is to send his +reports on these subjects under flying seal through Cromer. In all +this it is impossible to find more than a hint of the true object +of the mission. It is contained in the document, but hidden away in +the two unobtrusive concluding paragraphs. These are: “You will +consider yourself authorized and instructed to perform such other +duties as the Egyptian Government may desire to entrust to you, and +as may be communicated to you by Sir E. Baring. You will be +accompanied by Colonel Stewart, who will assist you in the duties +thus confided to you.” (Gordon afterwards described Stewart as +having been sent with him as his dry nurse to keep him out of +mischief.) “On your arrival in Egypt you will at once communicate +with Sir<span class="pagenum" id="Page_182">[182]</span> E. Baring, +who will arrange to meet you and will settle with you whether you +should proceed direct to Suakin, or should go yourself or dispatch +Colonel Stewart to Khartoum <em>via</em> the Nile.”</p> + +<p>These instructions, I say, are a model of how to conceal an +intention, and have the true Foreign Office ring. They really +amount to <em>carte blanche</em> to propose or do anything that the +missioner could get Cromer to consent to, and, in fact, cover all +and more than all that Gordon eventually tried to perform. “Such +other duties as the Egyptian Government might entrust to you” would +have included either his handing over the whole Soudan to the +Mahdi, or his determination to smash the Mahdi, or again to Sarawak +the Soudan on his own account or King Leopold’s or the Queen’s. +Cromer was made responsible for all, and the Government at home +retained the ordinary parliamentary privilege of disavowing their +own responsibility for things if things went wrong. Above all, it +enabled Granville to telegraph to Gladstone with a free conscience +that Gordon had been sent by the War Office simply “to report.”</p> + +<p>I confess that, though I have blamed and still blame Gladstone +for nearly all the misfortunes that have happened since 1882 in +Egypt, I here feel some sympathy with him as with a man duped and +deceived. He certainly would never have consented to the Gordon +mission in its full sense if he had been allowed to understand the +full meaning of the instructions. He would have known, not only +that the sending of Gordon “to report” would make it very difficult +not to accept and act upon his report—this point he noticed in a +letter written by him at the time—but also that sending Gordon, who +was a fighter born, on a merely peaceful mission to +carry<span class="pagenum" id="Page_183">[183]</span> out a +military plan which he had himself declared to be impossible except +with the aid of a large body of troops, would make the sending of +troops also a certainty. Gordon was in the eyes of the British +public a Christian hero starting on a crusade, and it was +inconceivable that he should be left to perish for want of +Christian help. It is true that, when Gladstone arrived three days +later in London, a Cabinet was held, where the thing was more or +less explained to him, and that he consented to what had been done; +but it was by this time a <em>fait accompli</em>, and too late to +stop Gordon, who had already reached Brindisi and was on the high +seas on his way to Port Said. His mission could no longer be +cancelled. All the religious press of England had risen like one +man to the occasion, and were rejoicing over Gordon as the champion +of Christendom. It was too late to recall him.</p> + +<p>What the choice of such a missioner meant for the Government in +the way of new astonishing responsibilities may be gathered from +Stead’s scream of triumph printed in the “Pall Mall Gazette” on the +day after his departure. It is headed “At Last.” It began: “The +whole Egyptian question has been revolutionized in an hour. At +yesterday’s informal meeting of the Ministers at the War Office +there was taken one of those decisive steps that make or mar the +destinies of Empires. . . . The question called for immediate +decision. After some consultation Ministers determined to accept +General Gordon’s conditions. The decision was arrived at between 3 +and 4 yesterday afternoon. At 8 General Gordon had left London for +Khartoum. The die was cast. Henceforth we have the full and +undivided responsibility for affairs in the Soudan. Whether we +evacuate the country or whether we retain it, as soon as +General<span class="pagenum" id="Page_184">[184]</span> Gordon +takes command, and for so long as General Gordon’s commission +holds, England is directly responsible for whatever is done in the +name of the Egyptian Government between the third Cataract and the +Equatorial Lakes. That is an enormous extension of our +responsibilities, but vast as it is it is not all. Whether the +public realizes it or not, the dispatch of General Gordon to the +Soudan, exercising practically unlimited powers not as +Governor-General of the Khedive, but as the accredited +representative of the British Government, must entail as a natural +and inevitable corollary the assumption sooner or later of a +similar responsibility as direct and as unlimited for the affairs +of Egypt proper.”</p> + +<p>Gladstone after this was powerless to draw back, and, putting a +good face on the matter as long as the sun shone, he went in for +the gamble with the rest. An immense gamble it certainly was, and +one for which he was destined to pay heavily.</p> + +<p>As for Gordon himself he started in the highest possible +spirits. He had got the secret wish of his heart thrust upon him +without his seeking it; he had not “hailed the tram of the world”; +it was “the tram of the world” that had hailed him, and his +conscience was at rest. He was certain now that God was with him +and that the service imposed on him was God’s service, and so could +not but succeed. His very first act after seeing the Ministers was +to telegraph to Barnes from the War Office at five o’clock: “I go +to the Soudan to-night; if He goes with me all must be well.” And +in a letter to the same Barnes on his way to Brindisi, he says: “I +am quite restored to my peace, thank God, and in His hand He will +hide me. . . . The Hosts are with me. Mahanaim.” He counted much +upon the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_185">[185]</span> prayers +that were being offered for him in every church and chapel in +England. “If people ask after me, tell them they can greatly help +me with their prayers, not for my earthly success, but that my +mission may be for God’s glory, the welfare of the poor and +wretched, and for me what He wills, above all for a humble heart.” +And again, 26th January: “I leave for the Soudan to-night. I feel +quite happy for I say if God is with me who can or will be hurtful +to me? May He be glorified, the world and people of the Soudan be +blessed, and may I be the dust under His feet.”</p> + +<p>That Gordon was absolutely sincere in this estimate of his +mission we cannot doubt. Yet what a self-delusion! What a +blindness! He did not perceive that those who were sending him on +this last great adventure of his life were no angels of the Lord, +but four wily statesmen doing the work mainly of the London Stock +Exchange, and interested far more in perpetuating England’s robber +hold on Egypt than in any humanitarian scheme which might be +imagined for the Soudan—he himself a useful pawn in their not very +noble game, and some of them ready enough already to sacrifice and +betray him. He did not perceive this or understand that, if it were +a question of God being on one side or the other, it could hardly +be with these, but with the poor fanatic Soudanese who really did +believe in Him and counted on Him to hear their vociferous prayers +and praises, and give them the victory. He did not understand that +all the men of good in the Soudan would be found on the Mahdi’s +side, and all the men of Belial, the scoundrel refuse of the +corrupt city of Khartoum, on his own, leaving him with only the +least godly weapons of the flesh wherewith to fight, some modern +superiority of weapons, money<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_186">[186]</span> to buy a faithless fidelity, and his own +skill and courage as a fighting man.</p> + +<p>It was an instinct of his self-delusion and a knowledge of the +base ends of those that sent him that caused me to write to him as +I did from Delhi. I knew that this time he must be wrong, that he +was being sent on a fool’s errand, and that he would be betrayed +and defeated.</p> + +<p>Of the many things with which Gordon has been reproached +officially in the conduct of his mission by those who would shift +the blame of his failure from their own backs on to his, I will +endeavour to deal with the chief and especially with those brought +against him by Lord Cromer, only premising once again that the +mission itself was according to my ideas a bad one and doomed from +the first to failure. Lord Cromer, his chief assailant, has +reproached him with a constant change of plan, with +insubordination, with failure to do his duty, and with being the +cause of his own defeat. I will endeavour to set these matters in +their true light.</p> + +<p>Gordon’s idea when he left London seems to have been a clear one +as to the general lines of what he was to do. He was to make his +way to Khartoum as he best could, take over the military command of +the place from Coetlogon, withdraw the Egyptian garrisons from +their outlying posts in the interior, and make what arrangements he +could for a government at Khartoum to take the place of the +Khedive’s. It was to be a government which was not to be an +Egyptian Government, and for which Her Majesty’s Government was not +to be responsible. These two conditions had been imposed on him, +and he had accepted them. All the rest was left to his discretion, +subject only to Cromer’s official approval.</p> + +<p>A point he on his side had insisted on at the outset<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_187">[187]</span> was that he should go under +orders from his own Government, and not merely as taking foreign +service with his Government’s permission. His insistence about this +was, I believe, primarily with him a matter of honour. He had +engaged himself to King Leopold, and he could not with any decency +throw him over to enter the service of another foreign prince +unless it was in compliance with an order he as a soldier was bound +to obey from his own Government. Also it would ease his conscience, +as signifying to him more clearly the command of God, and not the +gratification of his own secret wish. This is how I read the +matter. It could not have been with him a rooted objection to +re-entering a foreign service or in particular the Khedive’s +service, for as we have seen he recommended Baker, if he went to +the Soudan, to go there as the Khedive’s Governor-General. What +would have been the right course for Baker must have been the right +course also for himself. As a matter of fact he would have found +himself even more powerless than he proved to be at Khartoum if he +had gone there simply as a British officer. Stewart had gone there +as such, but his had been no executive mission. Gordon’s was to be +essentially executive, and it was imperative with him to have local +authority from the local sovereign, if only to treat with the +tribes for the withdrawal of the garrisons. The English Government +could not give him this—it must of necessity be given him by the +Khedive. It argues therefore no change of plan that Gordon, on his +way to Egypt, should have proposed that if he went to Khartoum it +should be in his old capacity as Governor-General. He had gained +all that he wanted for his soldier’s honour once he had received +his own Government’s order to undertake the service. +The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_188">[188]</span> +Governor-Generalship was a means to an end, and in his view the +only means.</p> + +<p>A more reasonable reproach which might be made to him—but it has +not been officially made—is that he abandoned the idea he certainly +had at the outset of going straight on a peaceful errand to the +Mahdi at El Obeyd and treating with him personally for the +withdrawal of the Egyptian garrisons. I have always been of opinion +that that would have been his wisest course; and it certainly was +in his mind when he started from London, for passing through Paris +the next morning he saw Sheffield at the Embassy and told him of +his intention so to do. There was, of course, considerable risk in +the matter, but it was just one of those risks Gordon had over and +again run successfully in the Soudan, and there is good reason to +believe that, properly accompanied, he would have been courteously +received at El Obeyd, and that, if he had negotiated on the basis +of withdrawing the garrisons peaceably and handing over Khartoum at +once to the Mahdi, the Mahdi would have provided the necessary +escorts. At any rate, it was his best chance. But that was not what +either our Government or the Government at Cairo wanted; and, once +at Cairo and in the Khedive’s service, this course was formally +forbidden him, nor did Gordon persist in it. It cannot be too +strongly repeated that what Gordon was intended to do was not +merely to evacuate the Soudan, but to establish a Government at +Khartoum and in the eastern provinces which should take the place +of the Khedive’s Government and serve as a barrier between Egypt +proper, including the Red Sea coast, and the Mahdi’s fanatical +advance. To hand over Khartoum to the Mahdi was not, at that time, +whatever Lord Cromer may now pretend, in his more than in +the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_189">[189]</span> Khedive’s plan. +I think, nevertheless, that if Gordon had understood the full +political power and religious position acquired by Mohammed Ahmed +since the fall of El Obeyd and the destruction of Hicks’s army, he +would have held to the idea of treating with the Mahdi personally. +Unfortunately he throughout underrated his opponent and allowed +himself to be persuaded that through the power of money and a +display of vigour, joined with reforms in the way of more freedom, +less taxation, and better justice, he could build up a counter +popularity to that possessed by the Mahdi. It was a snare into +which he too easily fell.</p> + +<p>Another sudden change of plan, which Lord Fitzmaurice says +surprised and disturbed the Government soon after Gordon had been +despatched upon his mission, and in regard to which he is severe, +calling it a plan “fantastic in the extreme,” is that which Gordon +announced of re-establishing the family of the Sultans of Darfur in +their hereditary possessions. It was, perhaps, not a very practical +idea, but that the Foreign Office should have been surprised at it +only shows its ignorance of its own records, for it is to be found +in no less conspicuous a document than Stewart’s Soudan Report of +February 1883, to say nothing of its having been repeatedly put +forward unofficially by Gordon in print and officially by +Abd-el-Kader Pasha in December at Cairo. The whole conception of +the re-establishment of independent native states in opposition to +the Mahdi was, in my opinion, one unsuited to the circumstances of +the case, however desirable in itself; but, at any rate, there was +nothing new in it nothing to “surprise or disturb” Lord Granville. +Gordon had hardly arrived at Khartoum before he found the whole +scheme impracticable, and it was<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_190">[190]</span> heard of no more. Even under the most +favourable circumstances it would have been very difficult of +accomplishment, and, as a move counter to the Mahdi, could not +possibly have succeeded.</p> + +<p>Much the same may be said about the idea of employing Zebehr. +Here, too, the “surprise and disturbance” of the Foreign Office +were entirely gratuitous. When Gordon arrived at Cairo Zebehr had +already been engaged there for some weeks recruiting and drilling a +black force from among the Soudanese, and had got together 200 +ex-soldiers and ex-slaves impressed in Egypt proper. These were +destined to be sent with Zebehr for service in the Soudan, and had +been regularly enlisted by Zebehr for the Government. It was +therefore gratuitous on the part of the Foreign Office to affect +surprise that it should be proposed by Gordon to take Zebehr and +his men with him. There was, of course, reason for comment that it +should have been Gordon, and no other, who made the request, for +Gordon had quarrelled with Zebehr and had been responsible for his +son’s death, and Zebehr had been the head and front of the slave +trade rebellion in the Soudan. But Gordon was no longer on an +anti-slavery war-path. He had lived long enough to understand that +battling in the Bahr el Gazal against the slave-hunters was not the +surest way of dealing with the evil of slavery or stopping the +trade. And his present mission was of an entirely different kind, +one which needed Zebehr’s help, not a continuance of his hostility. +Gordon was a man who never pursued his resentments far, and he was +always ready to forget a quarrel and to believe once more in the +man’s friendship who had wronged him or whom he had wronged. He had +buried the hatchet with Tewfik and Nubar and Cromer. +Why<span class="pagenum" id="Page_191">[191]</span> not also with +Zebehr? There was nothing really to be surprised at, nothing to +blame or to forbid.</p> + +<p>As to the policy of enlisting Zebehr as an ally I am not of +opinion that it would have led to much profit in the way of helping +Gordon to establish a buffer state against the Mahdi. Zebehr had +been too long absent from the Soudan to be of use to him in that +way. His influence was dead, and it is all but certain that he +would have yielded to the new influence abroad among his people and +thrown in his lot with the Mahdi. I do not think he would have +betrayed Gordon. He was a man of old Arab nobility and chivalrous +traditions, and he had no actual blood feud with Gordon, for it was +Gessi, not Gordon himself, who had had Suliman Zebehr shot. In +after years I have talked these matters over with Zebehr, and am +convinced that he would not have betrayed Gordon, only that he +could not have stemmed the tide which was then so strongly flowing +in the Mahdi’s favour. All that he could have done would have been +to serve as intermediary between Gordon and the Mahdi, and to warn +Gordon against some of the worst mistakes he made.</p> + +<p>The great weakness of Gordon’s position at Khartoum was that, +being almost ignorant of Arabic and without any dependable native +interpreter (for his old secretary Berzati had accompanied Hicks on +his fatal campaign and there lost his life), he was left to the +tender mercies of Greek merchants and other Christian informants as +to what was going on. Zebehr would, at any rate, have supplied him +with reliable news and a correct interpretation of the letters he +received from the Mahdi. As it was, with no one near him to explain +the exact truth, Gordon was as a blind man at Khartoum and became +the tool of rogues who betrayed him with false tales and +prevented<span class="pagenum" id="Page_192">[192]</span> him from +seeing what otherwise he could not but have recognized, the +sincerity and high character of the Mahdi. With Zebehr at his side +he could not have committed his last crowning mistake of offering +Mohammed Ahmed a tarboosh and a Sultanate, an insult which more +than any other sealed his doom.</p> + +<p>Lastly, as to Gordon’s pretended insubordination and +disobedience to his instructions, the case against him is really +not maintainable. Even admitting that his instructions on leaving +London, and the free hand accorded him, were nothing more than are +contained within the four corners of the written memorandum drawn +up at the Foreign Office, he must stand personally absolved. The +paragraph, “You will consider yourself authorized and instructed to +perform such other duties as the Egyptian Government may desire to +intrust to you and as may be communicated to you by Sir E. Baring,” +covers him entirely from any blame there might be in the extension +of his duty in Egypt. Lord Cromer tries in his “Modern Egypt” to +evade his own responsibility in regard to such extensions of duty +by pleading that it was Gordon himself who initiated them; thus he +instances a telegram he received from Granville dated the 18th: +“Gordon suggests that it may be announced in Egypt that he is on +his way to Khartoum to arrange for the future settlement of the +Soudan for the best advantage of the people.” This telegram, Cromer +points out, says nothing of his duty of reporting, and he adds, “if +General Gordon was to arrange for the future settlement of the +Soudan, I fail to see how he could do so without exercising some +executive authority.” On this ground he protests that “the idea of +Gordon’s going as Governor-General to the Soudan did not emanate +from any one in Cairo, it was made by General Gordon<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_193">[193]</span> himself.” Lord Cromer seems, +however, to have forgotten that the suggestion about the future +settlement of the Soudan was, in fact, his own of 22nd December, +and he has also forgotten that, if Gordon was sent in order to +arrange such a settlement, his appointment as Governor-General was +a necessary part of what he himself had approved before ever Gordon +arrived at Cairo. Lord Cromer’s answer, 23rd January, to the +telegram of the 18th, says distinctly: “All Gordon’s suggestions +are excellent and quite in harmony with the lines on which we have +been working. A message was sent by the Khedive some while ago to +the leading men at Khartoum which was in the sense and almost in +the words suggested by Gordon.” This proves that all that had not +at that time been contemplated at Cairo was that the English +officer expected to arrange the new settlement was to be Gordon and +not another, and that he was to go to Khartoum with the full +authority of Governor-General.</p> + +<p>If, however, there remains any doubt as to Cromer’s initiative +in the extension of Gordon’s duties, I am in a position to supply +an important link of evidence by giving the text of a hitherto +unpublished letter written by Cromer to Gordon the day before he +landed at Port Said. Though a most important letter in the +controversy, it is not to be found in any Blue Book, and Cromer in +his “Modern Egypt” ignores it entirely. The circumstances under +which it was written were these. Gordon’s idea in leaving London +had been to go straight through the Suez Canal without visiting +Cairo, and to proceed at once to Suakin, where he expected to be +able to put himself into communication with certain Sheykhs of the +Hadendowa tribe to whom he had formerly rendered a service while he +was Governor-General, and through<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_194">[194]</span> whom he counted on being able to reach +Khartoum, and eventually El Obeyd, for his proposed visit to the +Mahdi. In the Mahdi himself he thought he had recognized the uncle +of a young man who had been formerly in his service, and who had +been kindly treated by him, and so hoped to establish initial good +relations with him. He had come, however, to see that authority +from the Khedive was a necessity of the case, and he expected his +Firman of appointment to be delivered to him by Cromer on his +passage through the Canal. Such a course, however, was not exactly +in Cromer’s plan, who wished to get Gordon to Cairo, and so have +him from the start more closely under his authority, and to talk +over with him and Nubar the further instructions he was to receive. +He pretexted, therefore, an inability to spare time for a journey +to Port Said (there was no railway further than Ismailia at that +time) and instead of going himself, he wrote this letter and sent +it by the hand of Sir Evelyn Wood to be delivered to Gordon on +landing, with instructions to intercept him and bring him on to +Cairo.</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">“Cairo, <em>22nd January</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut">“<span class="sc">My dear Gordon</span>,</p> + +<p>“I was exceedingly glad to receive Lord Granville’s telegram +informing me that you and Stewart were coming to Egypt. I feel +confident that you may both render very great services as regards +Soudan affairs. I need hardly assure you that you can rely on my +most cordial support and assistance.</p> + +<p>“Wood, accompanied by Watson, is going to Port Said to meet you. +He is thoroughly acquainted with all the most recent facts of the +situation and with the views entertained by myself and others. +Under these circumstances I will not dwell at any<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_195">[195]</span> length on the course of action +which, as it appears to me, had better be adopted. I will only say +briefly that I think you had better go to Khartoum and arrange for +the withdrawal of the Egyptian garrisons etc. as rapidly as is +consistent with (1) the saving of life and so far as is possible, +property; (2) the establishment of some rough form of Government +which will prevent, so far as is possible, anarchy and confusion +arising on the withdrawal of the Egyptian troops. The task, though +very difficult, will not I believe in your hands be impossible.</p> + +<p>“I hope very shortly to discuss the whole question with you +personally and my views are of course liable to modification by the +light of your greater experience in Soudan matters.</p> + +<p>“Lord Granville told me that you were unwilling to come to +Cairo. It is not, on public grounds, desirable that I should leave +Cairo at present, although of course I would do so for a very short +time if it were absolutely necessary. I hope, however, to convince +you that it is absolutely necessary that you should come to Cairo. +The valley of the Nile is indeed at present the only route by which +you can reach Khartoum. The Souakin-Berber route is closed and, so +far as our latest information goes, there does not appear to be +much prospect of its being opened. It is also, I think, very +desirable that before you start you should discuss the whole +situation not only with myself, but with Nubar and others, so that +we may arrange a common plan of action and prevent any risk of +working at cross purposes. For these and other reasons I am very +strongly of opinion that you should come to Cairo. I need hardly +say that I should not propose a course of action, which I believe +to be personally distasteful to yourself, unless I thought that +there were<span class="pagenum" id="Page_196">[196]</span> strong +public grounds for doing so. Wood has arranged about Ibrahim Bey +Fowzi.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch5">“Believe me very truly yours,</p> + +<p class="right">“<span class="sc">Evelyn Baring</span>.”</p> +</div> +</div> + +<p>It will be noted in this letter, which was written before Cromer +had seen Gordon and therefore entirely on his own initiative, that +he suggests a new course of action to be adopted far in advance of +anything the original written instructions drawn up at the Foreign +Office contained. In the first place, there is no mention whatever +of reporting; secondly, Gordon is to go to Khartoum by way of Cairo +and the Nile instead of by Suakin. He is also to go himself and not +merely to send Stewart. Thirdly, he is to withdraw the Egyptian +garrisons as rapidly as is consistent with the saving of +<em>property</em> as well as life, an entirely new condition to be +found in no previous suggestion connected with the mission and one +necessarily entailing far greater time and labour to effect. +Lastly, he is to establish “some rough form of government which +will prevent anarchy and confusion arising on the withdrawal of +Egyptian troops.” This, although as we have seen it was in the +spirit and intention of the instructions, was an immense extension +of anything that had been actually written or telegraphed, of which +we have any knowledge; and the writer of the letter could hardly +have contemplated, in proposing such an extension, a work which +would occupy less than many months to execute, if not a whole year. +It is, moreover, absolutely at variance with the pretence +afterwards made at the Foreign Office that Gordon’s mission was +simply to withdraw the Khartoum garrison. And lastly, its date +proves the idea to be Cromer’s and not Gordon’s.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_197">[197]</span>As we know, Sir +Evelyn Wood met Gordon at Port Said with this letter in his hand, +and its effect was an entire change of plan on Gordon’s part. +Instead of going on to Suakin, he went back with Wood and Watson to +Cairo, saw Cromer, who took him to Nubar and later to the Khedive +both of whom received him graciously. Cromer then obtained the +necessary Firman (he probably drew it up himself) assigning to +Gordon his new duties. This Firman, be it observed, although it is +by far the most important document of the whole case, is suppressed +by Cromer in his “Modern Egypt;” and instead of it he gives a +letter he wrote to Gordon containing not the instructions +themselves but certain remarks about the way in which the +instructions were understood by himself. The instructions +themselves are to be found in Blue Book, Egypt, No. 12, 1884. They +amount practically to a <em>carte blanche</em> commission to do +whatsoever Gordon would with the Soudan without restriction of time +and without limit to his authority. They run as follows:</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center">“<span class="sc">His Highness the Khedive to +Gordon Pasha</span>.</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">“<em>January</em> 26, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut">“<span class="sc">Excellency</span>,</p> + +<p>“<span class="sc">Having</span> confidence in your tact and +experience, and being aware that the excellent services rendered by +you in the Soudan have endeared you to the people of those +provinces, and made them acknowledge the good derived from your +efforts to introduce among them tranquillity and good government; +and seeing that the present state of affairs in those territories +requires a person capable of grappling with the difficulties of the +situation, and of ameliorating the condition of the inhabitants by +restoring public<span class="pagenum" id="Page_198">[198]</span> +tranquillity on a sure basis, as it is our earnest desire to do +what is just and right, to remove all sources of discontent and to +observe equity towards the native populations, we do hereby appoint +you Governor-General of the Soudan by reason of your perfect +knowledge of that country, and we trust that you will carry out our +good intentions for the establishment of justice and order, and +that you will assure the peace and prosperity of the peoples of the +Soudan by maintaining the security of the roads open to +commerce.</p> + +<p>“Now by these presents we make known to you our desire, and urge +upon you a speedy departure for those provinces, so that good +government may be restored by your tact and experience.”</p> +</div> + +<p>This document, which is of the widest conceivable scope, covers +absolutely all that Gordon did at Khartoum, all that he designed to +do and all that he might have done. It included his decree +permitting slavery; it included all his military operations; it +included his refusals to retire before the accomplishment of his +full work unless his Firman were revoked; it included his attempt +to smash the Mahdi, and it would have included, if he had succeeded +in so doing, his remaining on at Khartoum and “Sarawaking” the +Soudan to the end of his days; or he might have ceded the whole +Soudan to the Mahdi, or, as far as I can see, made any other +arrangement for its future he might think fit. I repeat that thus +enlarged I do not approve of the mission. Also it was one bound to +fail. But I affirm that Cromer, who was the man responsible for the +enlargement of the mission, who procured the Firman’s signature +authorizing it, and who almost certainly dictated the instructions +it contained, should have been of all<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_199">[199]</span> men the last to blame Gordon because he +held these instructions binding on him and refused to obey anything +less direct than a counter-firman ordering him not to carry them +out. Cromer’s dispatch to the Foreign Office, enclosing the Firman, +admits his responsibility and the largeness of its scope. “It was +thought desirable,” he says, “after full discussion here that the +widest discretionary powers should be given to General Gordon as +regards the manner of carrying out the policy and as to the best +time and mode for announcing it at Khartoum. . . . Although he +takes his instructions from me, the widest discretionary power has +been left to him. His visit to Cairo was most useful as it will +enable the Egyptian authorities to be of much greater service to +him than would have been otherwise possible. His views differ in no +sort of way from those entertained by Nubar Pasha and myself.”</p> + +<p>Yet Lord Cromer to-day has the face now to come forward and +charge Gordon with overstepping his authorized programme! That he +was so understood to have overstepped them in the summer of 1884 I +know, for I myself thought he had done so, but the full facts had +not yet been made public, and we knew only what the Government +chose to tell us. But the Government itself already knew all, and +yet it accused him; and Cromer, who knew and knows the truth better +than any one, accuses him still!</p> + +<p>As to what happened after the mission left Cairo the history is +too well known for there to be any necessity for my recapitulating +it here. All now depended on Gordon’s being able to inspire such +confidence in the Khartoum garrison as to hold the fort till +succour should come. This was expected to be, if at all, from +Valentine Baker at Souakin, Sir<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_200">[200]</span> Samuel’s brother. The position at Souakin +was this. The sending of Hicks to Khartoum to take command of the +Khedivial troops in the spring of 1883 had been answered by the +Mahdi by the dispatch of emissaries into the provinces between the +Nile and the Red Sea to preach a religious war against the infidel; +and the war broke out early in the autumn under the afterwards +celebrated leader Osman Digna, who, with the fighting tribe of the +Hadendowa, set themselves to occupy the caravan road from Berber to +Souakin and lay siege to that seaport and to the fortified places +near it. In October a force of 500 Egyptian troops sent to relieve +one of these last was surprised and routed, and the English Consul, +Moncrieff, a young naval officer who had gone with them, was killed +by the Mahdists. The defeat of Hicks in Kordofan speedily followed, +and Khartoum began to be threatened. The Souakin-Berber route was +at that time the speediest mode of communication between Cairo and +Khartoum, and after one or two more misadventures near the Red Sea +coast it became completely blocked, and it was found necessary to +attempt to reopen it, and thus towards the end of the year, there +being no more regular Egyptian troops to send, Baker Pasha, who had +been organizing a corps of military police at Cairo, was entrusted +with the duty, his police accompanying him, strengthened with the +scratch force of Turks and negroes impressed by Zebehr in Lower +Egypt. Baker’s duty, as defined in the Khedive’s Firman appointing +him, was to “take command of the operations which have for their +object the pacification of the regions lying between Berber and +Souakin and the maintenance of communication between these two +points. . . . You should use every means of conciliation and +diplomacy, with a view to<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_201">[201]</span> secure the obedience and submission of the +Sheikhs of the different tribes before having recourse to +force.”</p> + +<p>Valentine Baker’s character was one that in this double duty +inspired confidence at the War Office. I remember him as long ago +as the winter of 1860-61, when he was in command of the 10th +Hussars at York, the hard-riding popular Colonel of a hard-riding +popular cavalry regiment, the smartest in the British army, +hunting, every officer of them, four days a week with the York and +Ainsty or the Bramham Moor hounds—the ideal man of his cavalry +type. Then he fell into trouble, and in the midst of a promising +career had to leave the British army. The campaign of Plevna was +just beginning in the Balkans, and he took service with the Turks +and greatly distinguished himself in the famous retreat after the +fall of that fortress, and thus he had become a Pasha in the +Sultan’s service. But, on receiving the news of Tel-el-Kebir, +nothing would satisfy him but an attempt to get back into the +British army, and he unceremoniously left Constantinople and came +to Cairo, where he was made welcome by his former fellow soldiers +and obtained from Sir Evelyn Wood the command of the <em>gens +d’armerie</em>, a quasi-military duty under the Khedive. Valentine +Baker was essentially a soldier of fortune and a fighting man, and +was burning with the desire of distinguishing himself by some +action of <em>éclat</em> and so being restored to Her Majesty’s +service. That was his position and that the service he had been +sent on, and he had taken command at Souakin on the last day of the +year.</p> + +<p>Gordon was expected to co-operate with him and do the same at +Khartoum, and his original plan of passing through Souakin was in +order that they<span class="pagenum" id="Page_202">[202]</span> +might make their plans together. Gordon was to help Baker to +conciliate and buy up the Souakin tribes, and he was himself to +make his way to Khartoum and re-establish order there and hold the +fort till the communications were free for both of them between the +two places. It was a plan in which common action was essential; and +then the Egyptian garrisons of the interior were to be sent down to +the sea coast and Gordon was to organize his new government at +Khartoum.</p> + +<p>The success of the whole plan as a military one of evacuation +depended on the possibility of a double success in reopening the +Souakin-Berber route and keeping it open, the other line of retreat +down the Nile to Egypt being too long and too difficult, in face of +the disturbed state of the country and the absence of transport, +for it to have been possible to convey the garrisons and the +civilians who were to accompany them in safety northwards. It was +an essential part of Gordon’s mission of evacuation that the road +to the coast should be cleared, and, as we have seen, Gordon, in +his letter to Sir Samuel Baker, had made co-operation between him +and Sir Samuel’s brother a first necessity of the position. No +soldier could have been blind to this.</p> + +<p>I am inclined therefore to think that Gordon’s original plan of +going to Souakin to take counsel with Baker would have given Gordon +a better chance of ultimate success than by changing it, as Cromer +insisted on his doing, to the Nile route. Also Gordon had a perfect +soldier’s right to expect that, if according to the new plan he was +to play his own part unassisted at Berber and Khartoum, the +Government that sent him should at least have helped Baker at the +other end of the evacuating line, that between the sea and the +Nile, to keep this line open.<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_203">[203]</span> There is a passage indicative of the +acknowledgement of such an obligation on the part of the Foreign +Office in Fitzmaurice’s “Life of Granville,” to which I shall +return later, a passage which would show that the British +Government at the time of their dispatch of Gordon intended to +defend not only the Red Sea coast against the Mahdi, but also the +whole of the eastern provinces as far inland as the Nile. Had they +adhered to this intention the necessary support would have been +given to Gordon, and it was thus that Gordon understood the +position.</p> + +<p>The whole plan, however, lost any chance of success it might +have had by the total and inglorious defeat of Baker at Teb on the +5th February. Gordon ought then, according to all strategic rule, +either to have been recalled or troops of some sort ought to have +been provided to reinforce him and open the road which Baker had +failed to open, the road now more than ever closed for his retreat. +It should have been done at once, if at all, for on the 19th of May +Berber declared for the Mahdi and the chance was gone. The +Government at home, however, could not make up its mind either to +recall Gordon or to send the assistance needed. There was a +conflict of feeling in the Cabinet which prevented anything being +decided. General Graham was sent indeed to Suakin with a British +force in February, but after fighting a battle or two with Osman +Digna he was forbidden to go further and his force was withdrawn. +Hartington and Wolseley at the War Office wanted Gordon supported, +but Gladstone stuck to it that he had always understood Gordon’s +mission to be a mission of peace and would not consent to Graham’s +advance. On the other hand, nobody in the Cabinet or at Cairo seems +to have had his wits sufficiently about him to get<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_204">[204]</span> Gordon’s Firman revoked, or to +have understood that without such revocation he could not in honour +abandon his mission. Had he been released from his instructions, +Gordon could have left the garrisons to make the best terms they +could with the Mahdi, and gone on, as was his original intention, +by way of the White Nile to the Congo. This would have been, if not +a very glorious, at least a simple solution of the difficulty, and +indeed, if troops were not to be sent, it was the only rational +one.</p> + +<p>Lastly, as to the English help promised Gordon which he is +blamed for having counted on, I think it cannot be doubted that +when he left London in February some such promise was made him, or +at least that there was an understanding to that effect between him +and the War Office. It may be gathered from his speeches that +Hartington so considered it, and it is notorious that such was +Wolseley’s view. Gordon was to go to Khartoum, in the first place, +to try his luck single-handed, but Wolseley always counted on +helping him if his luck should fail. Whether the full conclave of +the four Ministers who dispatched him on his mission so understood +the case is open to doubt; certainly Gladstone was not a party to +any such promise; and yet it must necessarily have been present in +their minds if not upon their lips. The contrary is +inconceivable.</p> + +<p>Also the Queen, who cannot but have been informed of all at the +time, unquestionably considered her Ministers to have promised +Gordon armed support. Her view of the obligation is to be found in +the letter she wrote to Gordon’s sister a few days after the news +of his death reached England, and which has been published. Queen +Victoria’s letter begins thus:</p> + +<p>“How shall I write to you or how shall I attempt<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_205">[205]</span> to express <em>what I +feel</em>! To <em>think</em> of your dear noble heroic brother, who +served his country and his Queen so truly, so heroically, with a +self-sacrifice so edifying to the world, not having been rescued; +that the promises of support were not fulfilled—which I so +frequently and constantly pressed on those who asked him to go—is +to me <em>grief inexpressible</em>!”</p> + +<p>This letter, drafted by no secretary, but written with the +Queen’s own royal hand, seems to me conclusive. Its very +indignation is the best proof of its truth, its anger at a betrayal +known by the writer to have been such. It is impossible that the +Queen should have used the words “the promises of support were not +fulfilled” without any such having been understood by her at the +time to have been made. There is, of course, no written record of +them in any of the papers presented to Parliament, and the promises +probably were verbal only, as indeed were all the details of the +mission treated departmentally between Wolseley and Gordon. But it +makes it almost certain that the War Office, if not the Government +as a body, had intended military support, if such should be +required, and had spoken of it to Gordon. Gordon certainly counted +on military help, for he alludes to it repeatedly in his +diaries.</p> + +<p>Who then, if not her Ministers, can have conveyed to the Queen +the idea of a promise having been given? Who gave or implied an +assurance that the mission would, if necessary, have outside help? +Between Wolseley and Gordon it was certainly understood that the +War Office would do its best to see that he was properly backed +when the time came. It might be difficult to get Gladstone to +consent, but pressure would be put. The Duke of +Cambridge<span class="pagenum" id="Page_206">[206]</span> also, in +all probability, said more than this. He saw Gordon off at the +station, and cannot but have recounted all to Her Majesty +afterwards. However silent Granville and the rest may have been, +these two, Wolseley and the Duke of Cambridge, must have promised. +The Queen’s letter remains its certain proof.</p> + +<p>For the rest of the incidents of Gordon’s tragic mission, having +said my say on the principal points in dispute regarding it, I will +now return to my interrupted diary. It will show how I at the time +regarded the mission, not in the light of my now better knowledge, +but as it was presented to me in part by the public voice, in part +by what I learned privately from those that knew.</p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_207">[207]</span><a id= +"c07"></a>CHAPTER VII</h2> + +<p class="sch1">EXCITEMENT ABOUT GORDON IN LONDON</p> + +<p class="dcap">MY Indian journey over I left Bombay for England on +the 1st March 1884, and arrived at Suez on the 12th, and going on +by Naples to Paris reached London on the 27th, altogether too late +to be of any avail in the matter of Gordon. He was already at +Khartoum.</p> + +<p>The only noticeable incident on this homeward journey was that +passing through the Suez Canal we found that vessels arriving from +Bombay were subject to quarantine, and so that any intention I +might have had of going ashore was necessarily abandoned. +Nevertheless, while I was standing with other passengers on deck, a +Government boat drew alongside our ship, remaining just outside the +prescribed quarantine limit, and I heard my name called with +inquiry whether I was on board, and going to the gangway was +accosted from the boat by an Englishman in the Khedivial uniform, +who informed me that he was Lieutenant-Colonel Gibbons in the +Egyptian service, and that he had been instructed on behalf of the +Government to notify to me that if I attempted to land I should be +subjected to arrest. The announcement mattered little to me under +the circumstances, though it proved afterwards to be the first step +in a course of prohibition and exile which shut me out from Egypt +for the next three years, and which, as will be seen, was +maintained against me as long as Lord Granville continued at the +Foreign Office.</p> + +<p>At Paris we spent a few hours in the society of our refugee +friends, Sheykh Mohammed Abdu,<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_208">[208]</span> Seyyid Jemal-ed-Din and James Sanua. The +first I had not seen since the war, for he had spent the first year +of his exile at Damascus, where the sons of Abd-el-Kader had +befriended him, and where he had lived poorly but in security with +a number more of the Egyptian Nationalist exiles. We found him +somewhat Europeanized already by a two months’ stay in Paris. He +had left off shaving his head, and wore a fez instead of a turban, +which rather detracted from his dignity as Sheykh, though he was +still dressed in a respectable fur pelisse. “He talks now openly +against the Sultan and the Turks, complains of the tyranny in +Syria, and argues of the Sherif Own as the coming Caliph. The +Mahdi, he says, is the forerunner of the Arabian Caliph who will +soon be.” To him and to Jemal-ed-Din I related all that I had done +in India, and my thought of going to Constantinople, but they +warned me this would be of no use; I might try, but they expected +no good to come of it. All the power there was in the hands of +Osman Pasha of Plevna, who cared only to fill his own purse. Syria +was becoming indoctrinated with ideas of liberty in spite of the +tyranny of spies and police. At Constantinople nothing could be +done. We talked of the Mahdi, who was now the chief subject of +interest with Moslems, and of Gordon, who was at Khartoum. +Jemal-ed-Din entirely approved of the letter I had written to +Gordon, and agreed that he would perish now that he had taken the +wrong side. The following occurs in my diary of</p> + +<p>“<em>27th March.</em>—We found Jemal-ed-Din in a little room +eight feet square at the top of a house in the Rue de Seize, where +he and Abdu edit a newspaper called the ‘Indissoluble Link.’ Almost +at the same time came in a very curious party of strangers +who<span class="pagenum" id="Page_209">[209]</span> quite filled +the room—a Russian lady, an American philanthropist, and two young +Bengalis who announced themselves as Theosophists, come, they said, +to consult the great Sheykh. They talked an extraordinary jargon +about humanity, but seemed kind-hearted people, and so full of +their cause as to take no notice whatever of our presence. The main +object of their visit was to inquire about the Mahdi, whom they +were all most anxious to believe in as a humanitarian, but their +minds were perplexed about the slave trade, and they +cross-questioned the Sheykh as to the Mahdi’s principles on that +head. The Sheykh had great difficulty in satisfying them, but +explained how much slaves gained among Mohammedans in exchange for +their freedom. This sent them away happy, but the poor Sheykh was +put to his last shifts to hide his amusement. When they were gone +we had a good talk about India, and all that we had done, which +pleased him much.”</p> + +<p>I called also at the Embassy, and had an hour with Sheffield, +who told me Gordon’s idea had been to go straight to the Mahdi and +make peace with him, but he had been prevented at Cairo. Now he +considered his case hopeless. Lord Lyons, whom I also saw, +acknowledged that we had got into an inextricable mess in Egypt. +The same night we went on to England, arriving in London. Here I +found myself once more in the thick of a political crisis, of which +the main feature was the interminable Egyptian imbroglio, made more +than ever acute by Gordon’s peril at Khartoum. My journal deals +principally with this, and indeed it occupied for ten months to +come almost the whole public thought of Englishmen.</p> + +<p>My first visits on arrival were to Button and Knowles, my +threatened arrest in Egypt being upper-most<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_210">[210]</span> in my mind. “Button still maintains his +connection with the ‘Times,’ though poor Chenery is dead and his +place as Editor has been taken by a young man, Buckle. He gave me a +pathetic account of Chenery’s death. He had suffered great pain for +years from a cancer, of which he told no one of the ‘Times’ staff, +though sometimes it would make him groan aloud. He was very +forlorn, being without intimate friends while knowing every one. +But he had an affection for Button. Then he had suddenly gone away +alone and died. Button’s political report was that the life of +Gladstone’s Cabinet was very precarious—hardly likely to last +through the Session. I stood well now, he thought, with the public, +as every one saw I had been right about Egypt.</p> + +<p>To Knowles I told what had happened to me in Egypt in +consequence of the encouragement given me. “Mr. Gladstone?” he +said, “I should not be surprised to see him any day order our +troops back and clear bodily out of Egypt; I have known him for +years, and as long as he can twist his conduct into an apparent +consistency of words, he will change his opinions without scruple. +But he will not endure being brought face to face with a flat +contradiction. It has always been the same, about art and +literature and everything else. As yet, he has maintained a certain +verbal consistency, but he cannot do it much longer.”</p> + +<p>A third visit was to my sister-in-law, Lady Wentworth, from whom +I learnt that my exclusion from Egypt had been ordered by the +Foreign Office. She knew of this from George Leveson Gower, +Granville’s nephew and Gladstone’s private secretary. Lastly, I saw +Randolph Churchill.</p> + +<p>“<em>30th March.</em>—I found Randolph in bed in a little room +at the top of his house in Connaught Place.<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_211">[211]</span> We had a long talk about Arabi and my +visit to India. He was curious to know what I had been doing with +the Mohammedans there, for Gorst had given him the idea that I had +started the university at Hyderabad for revolutionary purposes. I +told him I considered a revolution in India certain if changes in +the system of government were not introduced. He said, ‘It is +hopeless to try and get the Conservatives to take up the idea of +any sort of change.’ He seemed taken, however, with the notion I +suggested to him of playing the part of champion of the +Mohammedans. I proposed that we should go together to +Constantinople in the recess, but he said he was canvassing +Birmingham and could not possibly find time. About my having been +prevented from landing in Egypt he was especially interested, and +thinks it could be made a capital point of attack on the +Government. I told him the history of Knowles’s message to me from +Gladstone, without however mentioning Knowles’s name. But he said +at once: ‘Oh, I know, that’s Knowles, because he has told lots of +people the same thing.’ He advises the whole of my correspondence +about it being lumped at once into the ‘Times,’ and that Drummond +Wolff should be set at the Foreign Office to make the most of it in +Parliament.</p> + +<p>“He told me also that overtures had been made him from the +Khedive for a withdrawal of the charges he had brought forward +implicating him in the massacres of Alexandria, notably through the +Prince of Wales, who had had a quarrel with him, nine years before, +and had not spoken to him since. Now, however, the Prince had dined +with him at a select dinner of people interested in Egypt, and had +talked highly of the Khedive to him. ‘The thing, however,’ he said, +‘has served its purpose, and we must go on<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_212">[212]</span> to something fresh. I look upon the charge +as proved, and I know it smashed up the Khedive and the Government +policy at the time.’ Wentworth has made a really good speech on the +Soudan battles, and may, I think, help us much in our new +campaign.</p> + +<p>“<em>31st March.</em>—Gordon has been defeated outside Khartoum, +his army of 2,500 flying from sixty of the Mahdi’s men. What a +hideous comedy it all is. He is now calling for English troops, he +who went out to give freedom to the Soudan, peace on earth and +goodwill towards men. [This is how I regarded his mission at the +time.] Called on Sir Wilfrid Lawson, the only honest man in +Parliament. He urges that we should make some move for the +restoration of Arabi, but I doubt whether the time has come. At the +present time the Mahdi is the one popular man in Egypt. Saw Lyulph +Stanley.<a id="FNanchor_28"></a><a href="#Footnote_28" class= +"fnanchor">[28]</a> He is now for a Protectorate in Egypt, and I +can find nobody in favour of a Nationalist restoration. They all +say now that I was right and Arabi was an honest man, but they +treat it as a matter of history, and rather old history too. Button +advises my getting a legal opinion on the case of my exclusion from +Egypt before going any further. Lawson sends me some doggerel verse +about the war, not so good as the last he wrote, but to the +point.</p> + +<p>“<em>3rd April.</em>—Lunched with Button at the Carlton, who +tells me the Jews were never in such a fright about Egypt as they +were two days ago. The Rothschilds have still four millions +invested there and are working the press all they can. Lady +Rosebery is nearly the only person who is allowed to see Gladstone. +But they are in a terrible fright of his doing something violent, +<em>e.g.</em>, withdrawing the troops from Egypt. He, Button, sees +the Rothschilds nearly<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_213">[213]</span> daily, for the ‘Times’ is in their hands. +To-day, however, they are more confident, and people are buying +Egyptian stock. While we were talking, Burnaby<a id= +"FNanchor_29"></a><a href="#Footnote_29" class="fnanchor">[29]</a> +came in with Churchill and Gorst, and I had some talk with them. +Burnaby looks weak and wears his arm in a sling. [He was just back +from Souakin, where he had taken part in Graham’s expedition and +the battle of Tamanieb as a volunteer.] And I felt some disgust at +shaking hands with a man who has been murdering the Arabs with his +shot gun as he seems to have done. I have never liked him, for he +has the most evil countenance one can imagine. I like Churchill far +the best of the three. He has a light cheery manner like a boy at +school.</p> + +<p>“In the Park, where I sat for a few minutes and saw the two +Lytton girls looking like roses. Their father starts for Sorrento +to-night.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th April.</em>—To Auberon Herbert at the Langham Hotel. He +highly approves of the idea of letting the Egyptians choose their +own ruler, and waiting for a spontaneous movement to bring back +Arabi. If the British Government recalled Arabi now and proposed +him, he would be looked upon with suspicion by the people. Thence +to Lawson’s, whom I found in high delight at having got a +declaration out of the Government that they do not intend to send +troops to Khartoum.</p> + +<p>“Lunched with Labouchere. He is more practical, and we have +discussed every detail of the policy to be suggested to Gladstone. +He will feel the ground through Herbert Gladstone, which is his way +of consulting the oracle. He told me the history of Gordon’s +mission. Gordon’s idea had been to go out<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_214">[214]</span> and make friends with the Mahdi, and to +have absolutely nothing to do with Baring or the Khedive, or with +anybody in Egypt. He was going to Souakin straight, where he +counted upon one of the neighbouring Sheykhs, whose sons’ lives he +had saved or spared, and his mission was to be one entirely of +peace. But the Foreign Office and Baring caught hold of him as he +passed through Egypt, and made him stop to see the Khedive, and so +he was befooled into going to Khartoum as the Khedive’s Lieutenant. +Now he had failed altogether in his mission of peace, and the +Government had recalled him more than once in the last few days, +but he had refused to come back. Gladstone had decided absolutely +to recall all the troops from Egypt when Hicks’s defeat was heard +of, and was in a great rage. The expedition to Souakin had been +forced on him by the Cabinet, and Hartington had taken care to give +Graham no special instructions, so that he might fight without +orders. This Graham of course had done, and Gladstone more angry +still had gone down to sulk at Coombe. [Bertram Currie’s villa in +Coombe Wood.] Now he would stand it no longer, and he had let +Hartington in by coming up and making the speech he did last night. +Nobody expected it. Labouchere thought the moment most favourable +for a new move.</p> + +<p>“<em>7th April.</em>—Button tells me the Rothschilds are still +in a great state of anxiety about their money, and Button is for +the Government guaranteeing a loan of £8,000,000. It appears that +the French are quite ready to put in their oar and themselves +guarantee if allowed to protect. There is a split between Nubar and +Clifford Lloyd. Nubar has threatened to resign. This will bring +things to a crisis.</p> + +<p>“<em>8th April.</em>—At Crabbet, dawdling about +among<span class="pagenum" id="Page_215">[215]</span> the horses, +and going to see the Vardon property, which is for sale, and which +I must buy if I can. This property has for the best part of a +century been a thorn in our flesh, running like a wedge into +Crabbet. There is an entry in the shooting diary of 1824 in which +complaint is made of ‘old Vardon’s poaching.’ Now is the time to +rectify our frontier. An estate is a kingdom, with its wars and +intrigues and ambitions and thirst for new territory, and, though I +have no personal wish to increase mine, I consider this purchase a +duty of my reign.</p> + +<p>“I have written to Abdu a statement of my views about India, and +to Selim Faris asking him what chance I should have of being able +to influence people at Constantinople, if I went there, in favour +of an effort at Mohammedan regeneration.</p> + +<p>“<em>9th April.</em>—Called on Mrs. Howard. We had a tremendous +argument, I defending the Mahdi, she attacking him as a fanatic, +and begging me not to talk in that way in England. She said: ‘It is +so stupid of you, because you have so much sense, and if you would +be moderate you might have great influence.’ I said: ‘My influence +will never be great in England, because English people care nothing +for principle and everything for party, and I am not a party man. +My influence lies in the East, where all understand and accept me.’ +We talked about Baring, and their refusal to let me land in Egypt, +and she declared the Foreign Office had had nothing to do with it. +But George said it was the only sensible thing they had done yet. +We went on to Gladstone, and she described how he had become a +political gambler. He had gambled with me by sending me to Egypt, +just as he had since gambled with Gordon. If we succeeded he won; +if we failed he did not intend to pay. This, I doubt not, is the +position exactly.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_216">[216]</span>“Lunched at the +Carlton with Button. He intends to stand for Dorchester at the +General Election, which may be anywhen now. But it will depend on +events in Egypt. Gordon’s death would precipitate matters, but +anyhow Egypt must go bankrupt in a month or two. He asked me why I +did not look out for a constituency, but I said there was none in +England would elect me. I could only conscientiously stand as a +Home Ruler, and the Irish would not have me because I am an +Englishman. Besides, I could not belong to a Party. He agreed that +I was not meant for Parliament and had a stronger position outside. +I had some talk with Miltown, who believes in the Sultan’s Caliphal +prestige. I fancy the Tories, when they find they cannot annex +Egypt, will hand it over to the Sultan. Anything would be better +than the present state of things. I care little now who goes to +Egypt so long as the English leave and no other European Power +takes their place. But things are in the most extraordinary muddle; +I find people here more cordial and respectful of my opinion than +they were last year.</p> + +<p>“<em>10th April.</em>—My letter proposing a new settlement for +Egypt is in the ‘Times,’ with a leading article in disparagement. +It is all very well to bluster, but I cannot see how they are to +carry on their game of brag with no soldiers to send to Egypt and +the French getting angry, and bankruptcy staring them in the +face.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th April.</em>—Dined with Eddy Hamilton at the St. +James’s Club. He has been wanting to see me, and has written four +times since I came home. In spite of his declaration that we were +not to talk politics, nothing else was talked of. He began by +saying that he had read my letter to the ‘Times,’ and agreed with +most of it, but he thought it a pity<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_217">[217]</span> that I had mentioned the Khedive’s +abdication as a possible thing. I must know that the English +Government was committed to his support. It was committed before +Mr. Gladstone came into office, and such pledges could not be +withdrawn from. He himself had always regretted this, and had +considered the Joint Note of January, 1882, a great mistake. But +the thing was done now and there was no help for it. He was sick of +the whole thing and wished Egypt at the bottom of the sea. But they +could not get out of it till there was a prospect of peace. I said: +‘You will never have peace as long as you insist on keeping Tewfik, +and you are only at the beginning of your troubles. We will plague +you in turn with all the plagues of Egypt until you let the people +go. This year you will have the Mahdi, next year you will have a +flood, and the next a famine.’ He said: ‘It is impossible to do +anything for the Egyptians. They will not help themselves, they are +such miserable cowards, and there is not an honest man among them.’ +I said: ‘As for their cowardice, you have taken peasants from the +fields and have sent them to fight for a man they hate against a +man they love. As for their dishonesty, you have driven the honest +men out of Egypt or frightened them into holes and corners. There +are plenty of honest Egyptians, and I could guarantee an honest +government if you would let me, only not with Tewfik, and not with +the class of men you now employ.’ He said: ‘The rest are too +stupid.’ I said: ‘Egypt is the easiest of all lands to govern, and +it does not require cleverness to do it. It requires honesty and +the consent of the people. In all Arab societies the character of +the Ruler is reflected in the Ministers, and, with a ruler whom +they respected, and who had the qualities they respected, you could +reform the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_218">[218]</span> whole +mass. But Tewfik they never can respect, and the Circassians are +opposed to all reform.’ We talked about Gordon and the Mahdi. +Gordon it appears has written to say that the Mahdi has no power in +the Soudan, and Eddy thinks the whole thing a myth. He does not +want to send an army to Khartoum, but trusts to the desert frontier +as Egypt’s best defence. In this he is right, but I told him he +must expect raids such as the Wahhabis used to make in the last +century on Bagdad and Syria; they used to make desert marches of a +thousand miles. I warned him against employing Indian troops, and +told him my view of the danger of mixing India up with the troubles +of Egypt. He said: ‘I hope there may be no occasion.’ But from his +tone I should judge they have the possibility of employing Indian +troops in their eye, in spite of their public declarations. He said +they had no reason to believe these otherwise than loyal.</p> + +<p>“We then talked about my exclusion from Egypt, and he was glad I +had not attempted to force a landing on my way home, which he had +feared. He assured me the Foreign Office had nothing whatever to do +with the matter (which is not true), and trusted I would let the +matter rest. I told him that was out of the question, and as a +public duty, if for no other reason, I must bring it before the +Foreign Office. He seemed much taken aback by this, and I am sure +it was to find out my intentions, amongst other things, that he +proposed this dinner. We then talked about India. . . . While we +were talking the Duke of Marlborough came up and talked also about +India, and my success there with the Mohammedans. He knows India +well, and is a cleverer man than people give him credit for, +cleverer than his brother Randolph. [I ought rather to have said +more intellectual,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_219">[219]</span> +for he could not compare with Randolph in readiness of wit or those +qualities which made his brother a leader of men. But his mind was +a broad one, and if he had lived for anything else but pleasure he +might have gained a high public position in the world.]</p> + +<p>“I am satisfied with the conversation with Eddy. It is clear +they are at their wits’ end for a policy. They are waiting at +present upon Providence, but Providence will not help them.</p> + +<p>“<em>12th April.</em>—An important move is noticed in to-day’s +telegrams. Germany and Austria have presented identical notes +pressing the claims of their subjects on the Egyptian Government. +This will force a financial crisis and bring all Europe into the +matter.</p> + +<p>“<em>13th April, Easter Sunday.</em>—An anxious letter from Sir +Wilfrid Lawson. He is as angry as I am about Egypt. He would clear +out of it bag and baggage. I would stay long enough to do justice +and make reparation, no matter at what cost to England.</p> + +<p>“<em>15th April.</em>—Abdu and Sanua have both written, +delighted with my letter in the ‘Times.’ The French papers have +taken it up and reprinted it, and I expect it will cause some +trouble to Baring.</p> + +<p>“<em>16th April.</em>—Met Button at the Carlton and talked over +plans. Drummond Wolff, whom I met the other day, asked me whether +it was true that Button meant to break with the Fourth Party, and I +mentioned this to Button, and he said that it was so; Randolph was +becoming more unscrupulous than ever, and Gorst was still worse. +Not long ago they had tried to play a trick upon the ‘Times,’ and +had all but succeeded. Gorst had written to Buckle, who is young +and new to his work, to say that Sir Stafford Northcote had decided +to retire after the Easter<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_220">[220]</span> recess from the leadership of the +Opposition, and Buckle had actually got the article in print, when +at twelve o’clock at night the article writer had suggested that he +(Button) should be consulted. Button was in bed, but he got up and +succeeded in finding his uncle, Robert Bourke, who told him the +whole thing was a plant, he having been with Northcote that very +afternoon devising plans for the coming Session. So the article was +stopped just in time. Wolff, Button thinks, is the only honest one +of the lot. I expect Robert Bourke has advised him to have nothing +more to do with them. Young Hamid Ullah is here.</p> + +<p>“<em>18th April.</em>—Lunched with Colonel Osborn<a id= +"FNanchor_30"></a><a href="#Footnote_30" class="fnanchor">[30]</a> +to talk over plans connected with India. He thinks I have done a +great work there, and agrees with nearly every point of my +programme. But he says it is useless bringing it forward this year, +as Parliament is entirely occupied with the prospect of a +dissolution, and it would be impossible to get members to commit +themselves to vigorous action. He is probably right.</p> + +<p>“At three Mr. Stead, the new ‘Pall Mall’ Editor, called, and I +had a long conversation with him about the prospects in Egypt. He +tried to make me commit myself to some approval of annexation as +better than the present state of things, but I would not do this, +and I think he went away with the impression that I was +impracticable. He is by way of knowing a great deal of the opinions +of the various European Cabinets, and assured me that Germany would +not interfere with anything that might be done or proposed to be +done in Egypt, that Bismarck did not care what happened to the Suez +Canal, and that the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_221">[221]</span> +question would have to be settled between France and England. He +did not believe in the Mahdi having any real power in the Soudan, +and Gordon ought to be reinforced. Mr. Stead is a smart intelligent +pressman, very different indeed from his predecessor Morley. I do +not think we are likely to agree or that he will make any use of my +opinions. We are too wide apart. At any rate he promised to publish +nothing as mine without letting me see what he had written.</p> + +<p>“As he was going, Jack and Mark Napier rushed in to ask if I +would help them to save Gordon.<a id="FNanchor_31"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_31" class="fnanchor">[31]</a> They had an idea, which +was to get together a thousand sportsmen, men they explained who +would be ready ‘to go a thousand miles to shoot a lion,’ and try to +force a passage from Suakin to Berber and carry off Gordon on the +true principles of a rescue. They thought I might like to join them +and show them the way. But I told them the scheme was nonsense, and +even if it wasn’t I would have nothing to do with armed operations +against the Arabs. Much as I liked Gordon personally, I considered +him to be in the wrong and the others in the right, and I would +rather see him perish than cause the death of one of his opponents. +If it came to sending an Embassy to the Mahdi, I might be able to +help them, and I advised them to put this idea forward, rather than +the other. I have written to Jemal-ed-Din to ask him what he thinks +of it.</p> + +<p>“<em>19th April.</em>—At Crabbet. Count Alfred Potocki came down +with his son Roman, and Mr. Marcowski, manager of Count Branicki’s +stud, all Poles and breeders of Arab horses, to see our horses. +They have come over to England on purpose to see them,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_222">[222]</span> and are in raptures. Count +Potocki is a very distinguished man. Forty years ago he was attaché +to the Austrian Embassy in London and knew everybody worth knowing, +and he still keeps up a marvellous acquaintance with English +politics. We talked over the whole situation with regard to Egypt. +He ridicules the idea of the French being able to fight over the +matter, and he considers Gladstone the most dangerous man England +has ever had as minister. He tells me the new Russian Ambassador in +London who has just been appointed is the same Staal<a id= +"FNanchor_32"></a><a href="#Footnote_32" class="fnanchor">[32]</a> +who was my friend twenty-five years ago at Athens. It is singular +how many men whom I was with there, and knew intimately as +colleagues, have since distinguished themselves. Haymerlé, whom I +remember lamenting that he never on account of his birth could rise +higher than the rank of Secretary, died Prime Minister of Austria; +Nelidoff is Ambassador to the Porte; Staal is Ambassador in London; +Malzen Grand Chamberlain at Munich, and Dufferin, who however was +only a visitor at Athens in 1859, holds first European rank as a +Diplomatist after Bismarck. We talked about Lytton, who Potocki +declares will be the next Tory Foreign Secretary, and we talked +about India.</p> + +<p>“Button telegraphs that a Conference has been called!</p> + +<p>“<em>20th April.</em>—The ‘Observer’ announces that the +Conference will be held in London, but will confine itself to +financial matters. Baring has been summoned to England. My only +fear now is the re-establishment of the Dual Control, which is +evidently on the cards.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st April.</em>—Twiss has given his opinion on the case of +my being prevented landing in Egypt. It is<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_223">[223]</span> wholly adverse to my legal position as +having a right to land. I must now treat the case +diplomatically.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd April.</em>—Parliament met yesterday, and Gladstone +has at last admitted that Gordon is ‘hemmed in,’ though he denies +that he is ‘surrounded.’ The Governor of Berber<a id= +"FNanchor_33"></a><a href="#Footnote_33" class="fnanchor">[33]</a> +telegraphs that he must make friends with the Mahdi, and the French +are writing violent articles. The ‘Pall Mall’ this evening predicts +a war with France.</p> + +<p>“<em>23rd April.</em>—To London. Things worse than ever in +Egypt. Baring is on his way home to be hauled over the coals, and +about time; Nubar talking again of resigning if Berber is not +relieved; and Topsy Egerton,<a id="FNanchor_34"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_34" class="fnanchor">[34]</a> who is in charge at Cairo, +recommending a mixed English and Egyptian expedition of relief.</p> + +<p>“Jack and Mark Napier came again, and I read them the draft of a +letter I have written to Gladstone, proposing to act as mediator +for the relief of Gordon.<a id="FNanchor_35"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_35" class="fnanchor">[35]</a> This was suggested by one +I received this morning from Jemal-ed-Din to the effect that for my +sake he would do what he could with the Mahdi to save Gordon’s +life. Button advised me to take it myself to Downing Street and ask +to see Gladstone. But the Prime Minister was busy with a Cabinet +Council, and I was obliged to entrust it to Eddy Hamilton in the +hope of getting an answer. Button says it is too late, and that +they decided yesterday to send a relief expedition to Berber. But +as yet they have announced no such intention. Lord De la +Warr,<a id="FNanchor_36"></a><a href="#Footnote_36" class= +"fnanchor">[36]</a> too, approves of<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_224">[224]</span> the letter, and I think at least it will be +an advantage to put it on record that the offer was made. I told +Eddy briefly the nature of my proposal, and he said he was entirely +for peace, but he could not promise me Mr. Gladstone would see me, +because I was looked upon as an opponent of their Egyptian +policy.<a id="FNanchor_37"></a><a href="#Footnote_37" class= +"fnanchor">[37]</a></p> + +<p>“My idea of a solution would be either to go myself or get some +one else to go, Jemal-ed-Din or Abdu or young Abd-el-Aal, first to +Dongola, and thence to Obeyd. There ought not to be much difficulty +about this. The condition, I fancy, which might be accepted would +be the evacuation of the fortified places by Gordon and such +Europeans, Turks, Copts, and others as might wish to go back to +Egypt; a treaty of peace, or rather an engagement on the part of +the Mahdi that he would fix his frontier at Berber and Dongola, and +the Egyptian Government theirs at Assouan; a guarantee of the Red +Sea from Foreign European attack; an indemnity to the Hadendowas as +blood money for those slain at Teb, Tamasi, and elsewhere. For +myself I should stipulate that no military operation was to be +begun during my mission, that no revenge should be taken for my +death, or expedition be sent for my release in case of capture, and +that it should be recorded in writing that the terms of the +agreement should be kept. I should also mention that I should +expect Arabi to be restored in Lower Egypt should my mission prove +successful. But it is extremely unlikely they will let me go.</p> + +<p>“At the Carlton Club I met Seymour FitzGerald,<a id= +"FNanchor_38"></a><a href="#Footnote_38" class="fnanchor">[38]</a> +with whom I talked about India. He wonders I do<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_225">[225]</span> not stand at Horsham for the +next elections, or as a Tory Home Ruler in Ireland. Major +Napier,<a id="FNanchor_39"></a><a href="#Footnote_39" class= +"fnanchor">[39]</a> too, was there, and old Ranalagh with whom I +have always had a sympathy as having been once a rebel. He fought +with the Carlists in Spain. De la Warr is expecting the ex-Khedive +at Buckhurst.</p> + +<p>“Later to Button’s, where I met Brocklehurst, Gordon’s chief +friend and correspondent, and had a long talk with him about +Gordon. It appears that Gordon asked repeatedly for me when he was +starting for Egypt, and it is a thousand pities I did not see him +(being away in India), as I could have prevented his making the +mistake of going to Tewfik and neglecting to go to the Mahdi. +Brocklehurst declares that Gordon, from first to last, has refused +to believe in the Mahdi’s influence, and does not believe in it +now. He says that if he had done so he would certainly have made +friends with him. But he is very angry with Baring. He does not +trust much to the relief expedition, though he is in favour of +trying it, and I think he is inclined to support my plan of +negotiation instead. The only thing is, is it not too late?</p> + +<p>“Dined at Pembridge Crescent to meet Arthur Godley, who has +always been sympathetic with my ideas. He is now at the India +Office, and can afford to talk more openly than formerly when he +was Gladstone’s Private Secretary. He is all for peace in Egypt, +and thinks Gordon mad, which I, too, begin to think may be the real +explanation of it. About India he was very ready apparently to take +my views. But he considered the ill-feeling between Englishmen and +natives was confined to Bengal. I am to go to him again in a day or +two at the India Office to talk over Indian affairs. He agreed with +me when I<span class="pagenum" id="Page_226">[226]</span> said that +the end of it all would be that we should leave Egypt and only keep +possession of her debt.</p> + +<p>“<em>24th April.</em>—No answer from Downing Street, but Button +says that at the Cabinet Council yesterday afternoon they changed +their minds in favour of peace. Wolseley was there, and there was +to be no expedition after all. He thinks perhaps my letter may have +had something to do with it. Lunched at the Carlton and met Jem +Lowther,<a id="FNanchor_40"></a><a href="#Footnote_40" class= +"fnanchor">[40]</a> who talked about Egypt, and Robert Bourke, who +is asking the question about the dispatch of troops to Berber and +Khartoum. It is the opinion of both these Right Honourable +Gentlemen that the Government would give its ears to learn that +Gordon was dead.</p> + +<p>“To the House of Commons and heard Gladstone make his +explanation about Gordon. It is certainly most audacious. But I am +convinced it means no troops, though nearly everybody seemed to +understand the contrary. What he said was that ‘All human means +would be taken.’ Button, who was in the gallery with me, whispered +‘Human means means you.’ Rivers Wilson<a id= +"FNanchor_41"></a><a href="#Footnote_41" class="fnanchor">[41]</a> +was also in the gallery, and proposes to come and see me to-morrow, +a thing he has not done for the last two years. Gladstone is +looking thin and old. To my mind he does not show to advantage in +the House of Commons. He is argumentative, short tempered, and +insincere; the reverse in fact of what he is at home. And to-day he +looked like a fraudulent bankrupt trying to make his creditors +believe he was paying them twenty shillings in the pound. One +wonders how he can inspire confidence in his supporters, but I have +never heard him on a really great occasion.</p> + +<p>“I have written to Jemal-ed-Din, sending extracts<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_227">[227]</span> from the ‘Pall Mall,’ which +has my letter to Gordon, the one written from India, in it, and a +leading article recommending that I should be sent to Obeyd to +treat with the Mahdi.” [It says: “If everything—Khartoum, arsenals, +steamers, and munitions of war—if all these are to be handed over +to the Mahdi and the garrisons are to trust their lives to his +tender mercies, our proper agent in the Soudan is not General +Gordon, but Mr. Wilfrid Blunt. General Gordon was prepared to go a +great length in order to conciliate the Mahdi. Mr. Blunt is +prepared to go all lengths. General Gordon, as a last resort, and +being a man of war from his youth up, has always avowed his +readiness to fight rather than see his men cut to pieces. Mr. +Wilfrid Blunt would not injure the hair of an Arab to save the +lives of General Gordon and all his men. Mr. Blunt, then, is +obviously the man to whom the Government should turn in this the +hour of their need. He represents their policy to a nicety. If they +will not relieve Berber, and if they can do nothing to assist +Gordon to hold Khartoum, let them at least send Mr. Blunt in hot +haste to El Obeid to arrange with the Mahdi for the escape of the +abandoned garrisons. Mr. Blunt is not less brave than General +Gordon, and he could be sacrificed at least as safely.”]</p> + +<p>“At Button’s, where I looked in again to ask his advice about an +answer which has come from Downing Street. Reginald Brett, +Hartington’s Secretary, called, and Button saw him in the other +room. He states positively that the Government has decided not only +not to send troops to Berber, but to forbid the Egyptian Government +sending any. They mean to do nothing at all, and have telegraphed +to Egypt to say so. He thinks they will certainly come to me. Eddy +Hamilton’s note is to the effect that Mr. Gladstone<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_228">[228]</span> will answer later, but is now +laying my proposal before the Cabinet. He writes, however, another +private note suggesting that I should talk it over with +Brand.<a id="FNanchor_42"></a><a href="#Footnote_42" class= +"fnanchor">[42]</a> This, however, Button recommends me not to do, +so I have written to say I can only talk to Mr. Gladstone, and will +wait his convenience. What they want is, evidently, that I should +take all the responsibility of the negotiation on myself, and offer +terms which they might afterwards repudiate. But they won’t catch +me again doing this, and, if I go to Obeyd, I go as British envoy. +Otherwise I should only be waylaid by the Khedive on my road. +Button is in high delight at the upshot of it all. He tells me it +was Wolseley himself who told him what had been decided in the +Cabinet.</p> + +<p>“Dined at Pembridge Crescent to meet Captain Abney, a friend of +Gordon’s.</p> + +<p>“<em>25th April.</em>—To Button’s early, to talk matters over +again. But there is nothing new, except that the Bisharin Arabs +have joined the Mahdi, and the desert of Korusko is blocked. The +telegrams in the papers don’t say this. But Button had it from +Wolseley, and I have written again to Jemal-ed-Din, asking him +about the terms which we might ask. The Government won’t say +anything to me till Baring arrives; that is to say on Monday.</p> + +<p>“Wrote a number of letters, to Jemal-ed-Din especially, and to +Arabi, asking the latter whether it would be possible for him to +work with Ismaïl in case such a solution should be proposed. He is +to answer by telegram, the words ‘Content,’ or ‘Refuse.’ This +because I think the time is come when a new settlement +<em>must</em> be made; and this is not the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_229">[229]</span> most unlikely of the many proposals that +will be brought forward.</p> + +<p>“<em>26th April.</em>—Called on Button. He tells me the Cabinet +are again wavering about sending troops to Berber, or rather +Khartoum, for they would probably start from Massowa if at all. The +reason of this is that the Liberal M.P.s understood Mr. Gladstone’s +declaration yesterday in a sense exactly opposite to his real +meaning, that is to say as a promise of sending troops, and half a +dozen of their leaders went to him and explained how much they +approved of it, and Mr. Gladstone had been unable to satisfy them +by saying that all he had meant was that Gordon should be ordered +home. So, to please these people, there is to be more slaughter. +But we shall know when I get the answer to my letter. Button tells +me that several members of the Cabinet would be glad to go out of +office, notably Harcourt,<a id="FNanchor_43"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_43" class="fnanchor">[43]</a> who is afraid of dynamite +and is tired of being watched by the police. Three or four days +ago, talking of the Conference with Natty Rothschild, Harcourt +said: ‘Our hope is that the Powers will refuse our proposals, which +will give us an excuse for coming straight out of Egypt.’ Button +advises me not to send in my papers about my being refused entrance +to Egypt until I get my answer about the Soudan. My own idea was to +do so at once, as it is a rule of strategy to fight stronger than +ever when you are negotiating for peace.</p> + +<p>“Then to Rivers Wilson whom I found in bed with a cold and a fox +terrier. He is of opinion that the Conference will meet and that it +will be impossible to exclude politics. ‘Ferry,’<a id= +"FNanchor_44"></a><a href="#Footnote_44" class="fnanchor">[44]</a> +he said, ‘is beginning<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_230">[230]</span> to feel his legs, and he means to restore +the Dual Control, and will insist on dragging in everything if he +is asked to make a concession of French financial rights. You talk +about altering the Law of Liquidation, but that is out of the +question, and whatever happens, Egypt must pay the interest on the +debt. If this was not so I should be very happy to see you set up +Arabi or anybody you liked at Cairo. But what there must be is a +strong Government, which can collect the taxes and pay the +interest.’ He believes Egypt still able to raise £9,000,000 of +revenue and pay away half of it. But he spoke less positively than +in former days. We talked about Ismaïl. He would never have +anything to do with his coming back. Ismaïl was no longer any good, +as he had lost all his prestige, and though clever could not +maintain himself. Tewfik was good as an instrument. He himself had +chosen him in preference to Halim as being the more absolutely +servile of the two—but of course he could not rule. Arabi had lost +all sympathy in England by his personal cowardice. Rivers in fact +is all for annexation if annexation is allowed by the other Powers, +which he doubts. I then told him my views for Egypt. He has a good +deal of influence with the Rothschilds, and if we could get them at +all on our side we should win the game.</p> + +<p>“Then on to Labouchere, who has just written a capital letter +about Egypt in the ‘Times.’ He wants me to get Arabi to write him a +letter from Ceylon, giving his view about a possible restoration of +the National Party. He considers Gordon to be a stark lunatic, and +is for leaving him to his own devices.</p> + +<p>“<em>28th April.</em>—Berber is being abandoned, the garrison +having gone over to the Mahdi. Khartoum will follow.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_231">[231]</span>“<em>29th +April.</em>—The ‘Standard’ has a telegram, saying that certain +troops and tribes from Khartoum have joined the Mahdi. If so, +Gordon’s end has come. The ‘Daily News’ has a letter from +O’Kelly<a id="FNanchor_45"></a><a href="#Footnote_45" class= +"fnanchor">[45]</a> at Dongola, describing the Mahdi and his system +in almost the same language that these were described to me at +Cairo seven months ago. I wonder whether Eddy Hamilton would still +maintain that the Mahdi was nobody.</p> + +<p>“To London and found a letter from Jemal-ed-Din, giving me in +detail his idea of the Mission of Peace that might be sent to the +Mahdi.<a id="FNanchor_46"></a><a href="#Footnote_46" class= +"fnanchor">[46]</a> Button tells me that the Government have +decided <em>pour tout potage</em> to send Curly Knox to Khartoum! +The idea is that he, knowing the country as a sportsman, and +something of the language, could smuggle himself into the town, +where he could deliver to Gordon the Government’s order that he +should return. The Government think that this will absolve them +from all further responsibility, and that, if Gordon—as he probably +would—should refuse to come back, his blood would be on his own +head. I remember Curly Knox ever since the days of the Crimean war. +Now he is a somewhat decayed blood, a rabid damned-nigger +guardsman. And I would not be in his shoes when the Mahdi has got +hold of him—only he will never go. Baring has been to the ‘Times’ +people, which is always a sign with officials that they feel their +position shaky; and Button is sure he won’t go back to Egypt. He +has made too absurd a hash of it there. Colvin, he said, was a +clever fellow to get out of it when he did.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_232">[232]</span>“Called on Hill, +the Editor of the ‘Daily News,’ who has been asking me to write for +him. He agreed as to re-establishing a National Government in +Egypt, but it was necessary to find some formula for Mr. Gladstone +which could reconcile him to it; Mr. Gladstone changed his +principles constantly—but every time he needed a fresh formula, by +which he could satisfy his mind that he was consistent; he had +nailed his colours to Tewfik, and it would require management to +get him to abandon him. As for Gordon, they were going to do +nothing now except perhaps get ready for moving a small column of +relief in July.</p> + +<p>“Luncheon at the Carlton with Burnaby, whom I especially +dislike. He said he did not care a rap what happened to Gordon or +Khartoum, and why should he? So long as he has something to tell +his electors, it will be enough. He is a dull heavy fellow in my +opinion, with a dash of cunning and more than a dash of brutality. +Afterwards to the House of Commons, where I had a long talk with +Lawson and John Morley,<a id="FNanchor_47"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_47" class="fnanchor">[47]</a> whom Mrs. Howard has +written advising me to take into my councils. We three discussed +the whole thing. First, about Gordon, who we agreed was past +praying for. Morley said the Government were willing to bite their +tongues out now for having sent him; they were very angry with him, +for he had done everything he said he wouldn’t do, and done nothing +that they told him to do. He thought if his death had happened two +months ago, it would have turned out the Ministry. Now people were +tired of Gordon, and, though there would be a row, it would blow +over. He thought the Government would rather do anything than +accept my help, it would be very<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_233">[233]</span> unpopular, and, with the failure of Gordon +before their eyes, they would be doubly disinclined. Still the +necessity might be so great as to force them.</p> + +<p>“About Egypt I explained my views at length, Morley insisting +that I should put aside all moral arguments, and treat the case +only as it might appear to regard English interests. I said, +therefore, that I recognized two undoubted interests—(1) the Suez +Canal, and (2) the friendship of the Mohammedan world. Both these +he admitted, and said you may add a third. If things go on as they +are now, we shall be at war with France in less than five years. I +then explained that as regards the Suez Canal, we must either make +an arrangement with Europe or with France, and secure our interest +in it by sharing it with them. The friendship of the Mohammedan +world could be best secured by establishing a Mohammedan Government +in Egypt and withdrawing our troops. But France would only be +satisfied with the establishment of a strong Government, which +could keep order. This could be done by allowing the people to +choose their own ruler—a ruler who would be supported by the +troops. Egypt was the easiest country in the world to govern, but +you must have the troops on your side. This seemed to please Morley +as practical and businesslike. He asked me, however, to explain how +it was that last August Sherif Pasha had declared to the Government +that he was satisfied with the loyalty of the troops and begged +them to withdraw; it was then decided that all the English troops +should leave Egypt in the spring, except a Corporal’s guard to be +stationed at Alexandria, not to protect the Khedive, but to prevent +interference from the French. I told him the reason was this, that +the Egyptians then had no leader, and were hopeless in the hands of +the Circassians.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_234">[234]</span> +But now the Mahdi had appeared as a champion, and the army would +serve him rather than Tewfik. It was necessary therefore now to +consider the Mahdi, and find a ruler who could act on friendly +terms with him. He asked about Arabi, saying he was out of the +question now. But I told him I still considered Arabi a valuable +man, as a good Mohammedan and one who would take advice. But he +must not be recalled as our nominee, which would spoil his +influence. ‘Yes,’ Morley said, ‘the Egyptians must choose, and we +must leave the country—but we must not make it over to France.’</p> + +<p>“<em>1st May.</em>—Mr. Gladstone’s answer has come. Her +Majesty’s Government cannot make use of my offer to act as mediator +in the Soudan, ‘in as much as it must already be known throughout +that region that they in common with the Government of Egypt have +no other desire than to promote the evacuation of the country—and +the restoration of its liberties.’ This is as pure a specimen of +Gladstonese as can be found in Hansard. And the ‘promotion of an +evacuation’ is as funny as anything since the French were reported +to have ‘evacuated Spiders and Worms’ [an old Napoleonic joke].</p> + +<p>“To a Peace Conference, where I arrived just in time to prevent +two annexationists, Villiers Stuart and McCoan from carrying a +resolution calling on England to ‘take a determined course with +regard to reform in Egypt,’ specifying the reforms suggested by +Arabi. I exposed this manœuvre as meaning the dispatch to Egypt of +fifty more Clifford Lloyds and twenty more Evelyn Barings, and got +an amendment passed that ‘reform in Egypt should be entrusted to +the only hands capable of effecting it, those of the Egyptians +themselves.’ McCoan went away in a huff, and Stuart talked of +resigning the chair.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_235">[235]</span>“To the House of +Commons, where I had a talk in the tea room with old Donald +Currie.<a id="FNanchor_48"></a><a href="#Footnote_48" class= +"fnanchor">[48]</a> He told me that Gladstone had it all his own +way still in the Cabinet, and was at last anxious about Gordon. +‘His one idea now,’ he said, ‘is to avoid more bloodshed.’ Both he +and Sir George Campbell,<a id="FNanchor_49"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_49" class="fnanchor">[49]</a> who joined our +conversation, talked of Gordon as having gone off his head. I +showed him that terms must be come to at once with the Mahdi if we +were not to have another bloody war. He promised to speak to +Gladstone in this sense.</p> + +<p>“Spent the evening with Button looking through the Gordon Blue +Book. It is most damaging for the Government. Donald Currie and +Campbell talked of Gordon as having gone off his head. But this +Blue Book shows the Government went off theirs too.</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd May.</em>—Went to see Lady C. who talked about the +Prince of Wales and his political ideas. She says he is coming +round a bit to Arabi.</p> + +<p>“<em>3rd May.</em>—There has been a great split between Randolph +Churchill and Lord Salisbury; and Churchill has resigned the +Chairmanship of the Conservative Union. This will probably save the +Government, who were threatened with a dissolution, nominally on +the Reform Bill, but really on their Egyptian policy.</p> + +<p>“<em>5th May.</em>—Sent in my case of exclusion from Egypt to +Lord Granville. It is certainly a strong one, and I think it must +harass them if it does no other good.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th May.</em>—An extraordinary set of Parliamentary Papers +published relating to Gordon. Reading these and the others +carefully through, I have come to the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_236">[236]</span> conclusion that Gordon is a very +self-willed man, without fixed rule of action. In any case he has +clearly lost his head, and, having failed to exercise the influence +he expected over the Soudanese, has turned against them, and is now +the bitterest enemy of everything he supported as good last year. +He is fighting for his own hand as simply and solely as any +adventurer of them all. It will lead to a new war, if he has not +his head cut off and sent to Obeyd before the summer is over.</p> + +<p>“<em>7th May.</em>—Called on Percy Wyndham,<a id= +"FNanchor_50"></a><a href="#Footnote_50" class="fnanchor">[50]</a> +who is much exercised against the Government, as is natural, but at +the same time is reasonable about Gordon. I find most people +inclined in private to think him out of his mind. Percy has acted +very straight in all this Egyptian business. He was one of the +minority of nine, and the only Tory who voted against the war in +1882, and he has never made a mistake on any essential point. I +told him about my being refused a landing in Egypt, and he has +promised, when the time comes, to take the matter up in Parliament. +As my nearest relation, he is the right man to do it.</p> + +<p>“Lunched with Dr. Leitner.<a id="FNanchor_51"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_51" class="fnanchor">[51]</a> He shows great sympathy +with the Mohammedans, but is one of the Conservative school, loving +the Turks, and desiring no change. He wants me to make it up with +the Sultan, and urges me to go to Constantinople, and thinks I +might gain influence there.</p> + +<p>“<em>8th May.</em>—Button also thinks I had better go to +Constantinople and that Dufferin would be glad to see me. He, +Button, has seen Wolseley, who assures him no preparations are yet +made for a Soudan expedition. But he thinks, all the same, they +will send a small force when the Nile rises and will have +a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_237">[237]</span> large force in +Egypt. He wants me to call on him, but I don’t think I will do +this, as anything I could tell him would only make him more anxious +to send troops. I wrote yesterday to Jemal-ed-Din, telling him I +washed my hands of Gordon, that he had proved himself a friend +neither to liberty, nor to the Arabs, nor yet to Islam.</p> + +<p>“A long talk with Mrs. Howard. She says people will never +forgive me for having given Arabi information before the war, +especially about his being attacked from the Suez Canal. Lord +Granville is very angry still and F. Leveson,<a id= +"FNanchor_52"></a><a href="#Footnote_52" class="fnanchor">[52]</a> +but she thinks not Mr. Gladstone. She says the Government could +never recognize the Mahdi as a religious personage.</p> + +<p>“<em>9th May.</em>—Mrs. Howard, talking yesterday of my article +in the ‘Nineteenth Century’ on the proposed Arab race at Newmarket, +said that Freddy Leveson had asked Rosebery the other day why he +continued on the turf, and he had answered because it was the +easiest way in England to be accepted as a statesman, and he had +appealed to Gladstone, who quite agreed with him. She tells me that +her husband, who represents the ideas of the rank and file of the +Liberal Party, is infinitely disgusted with the Egyptian Policy, +and says that half the party would vote against the Government but +for Home Questions.</p> + +<p>“Called on Hugh Wyndham<a id="FNanchor_53"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_53" class="fnanchor">[53]</a> in Dover Street, he having +asked to see me. He is Secretary of the Constantinople Embassy. We +talked the Eastern Question thoroughly through, and he seemed +disposed to think my policy might be adopted eventually as far as +allowing the Arabs to set up a Caliphate was concerned. +Constantinople, he says, is crumbling<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_238">[238]</span> to pieces, the Turks of Europe emigrating +in a continuous stream to Asia Minor. The Germans are still +supporting the Sultan. The Government of the Porte is defunct, and +the Sultan rules everything through a changing set of Ministers who +are all opposed to each other. The Sultan himself is a mono-maniac, +fancying himself in constant danger of assassination. Hugh had seen +him when Dufferin was on leave, and the Sultan had talked to him +for three-quarters of an hour about a certain Armenian doctor who +had been found dead in the Bosphorus, and he could be got to think +of nothing else. He thought Dufferin would wish to see me if I went +to Constantinople.</p> + +<p>“<em>10th May.</em>—To Button’s. He tells me the Government +scheme was to offer a remission of the English interest on the Suez +Canal shares, for a reduction of interest on the bonds. This had +been proposed to France, and at first was well received, but later +Alphonse Rothschild had put pressure on the French Government, and +now they would do nothing unless there was an international +control.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th May.</em>—The ‘Observer’ announces that a relief +expedition under Wolseley will be dispatched to Khartoum in +October. Jemal-ed-Din writes expressing his great confidence in me, +which is satisfactory,<a id="FNanchor_54"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_54" class="fnanchor">[54]</a> for it is of course +difficult they should understand how I can remain on confidential +terms with our officials here and yet be true to Islam. It is a +strange position, but its strangeness is its strength.</p> + +<p>“<em>12th May.</em>—Met Churchill at the Carlton. He said: +‘Well, we shall have Arabi back very soon now.’ I said: ‘I am +afraid they will hand over Egypt to the Conference—and the +Conference will hand it over to Italy, and Italy will hand it over +to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_239">[239]</span> Ismaïl.’ He said +they would like to do it perhaps, but they would be prevented. I +asked him about his own affairs, saying: ‘You have been in the wars +since I saw you.’ ‘Yes, as usual,’ he said, ‘and I am not out of it +yet.’ Thence to the India Office, where I had it out with Godley +about the Patna case.<a id="FNanchor_55"></a><a href="#Footnote_55" +class="fnanchor">[55]</a> I told him there had been a compact that +if I did not publish the case it would be inquired into and +redressed; and nothing had been done. I did not wish to annoy Lord +Ripon, but I should have to bring it before Parliament before the +end of the Session. He promised to write to Primrose and represent +this to him, which he admitted was fair. We talked about Hyderabad +affairs. Cordery, he told me, was in London, and I explained, for +his private information, the whole history of the intrigue against +Salar Jung and the Nizam.<a id="FNanchor_56"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_56" class="fnanchor">[56]</a> He did not seem at all +surprised and said everything was going on right now. And I presume +Cordery is not to return there. He approved very heartily of the +University scheme. Godley is a good fellow, and I hear he always +speaks of me in high terms. I have always believed he left +Gladstone partly because of the Egyptian war.</p> + +<p>“After this to the House of Commons, where there was a +tremendous crush to hear the debate on the Vote of Censure, the +Duke of Cambridge and many another bigwig being left out in the +cold. I got in through Harry Brand, who entrusted me to Ponsonby, +who squeezed me into the Ambassadors’ Gallery, where I had a +capital place. Hicks Beach’s<a id="FNanchor_57"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_57" class="fnanchor">[57]</a> speech was an excellent +one, very well prepared and arranged, and rising at certain points +to eloquence. His best hits were when he asked if ever a British +Government<span class="pagenum" id="Page_240">[240]</span> received +such a telegram as one of General Gordon’s, and when he pointed to +Mr. Gladstone and repeated, ‘You will incur indelible disgrace.’ It +was a dignified speech, almost in the old-fashioned style, with a +Latin quotation, and without the modern Parliamentary violence, and +will increase Beach’s reputation. Mr. Gladstone was to my mind not +so happy. While Beach was speaking he had been taking notes in pen +and ink, and rose to answer him more as a man might in a debating +club, than as a statesman arraigned on a dishonourable charge. He +was argumentative, sarcastic, petulant, but in the course of +speaking he became angry, and then he spoke with effect. I was +immensely pleased of course at the line he took of declining to +make war on the Mahdi’s followers who were ‘men fighting for their +country’s freedom’ [‘rightly struggling to be free’], and Scott +Holland,<a id="FNanchor_58"></a><a href="#Footnote_58" class= +"fnanchor">[58]</a> who was near me in the Gallery, was equally +excited. But he did not state his case quite frankly, and +constantly spoilt it by drawing fine distinctions and quibbling as +is his wont with words. In a speech of this sort, it was surely a +mistake of oratory ever to suggest a laugh. His argument, however, +was a strong one, that the Opposition had never during all the +Egyptian troubles formulated an alternative policy, and he was +powerful when he challenged Hicks Beach to say that he would send +an army to Khartoum. Having said this he waited a moment, and then +pointing to Beach, turned to the House and screamed ‘Look! Dumb!’ +This was a great oratorical success. But as I have said before, +oratory under the circumstances was rather out of place. I have +been unfortunate in never hearing Gladstone quite at his best, +though Lawson called this one of his best.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_241">[241]</span>“<em>13th +May.</em>—Talked things over with Button. He advises me certainly +to go to Constantinople, but to tell nobody about it. It seems +there is some chance of the Vote of Censure being carried, and all +now depends on the Irish members. If they can turn the Government +out, they will do so, for the sake of a dissolution. But if they +doubt their power they will vote for Government. They will only +make up their minds at the last moment. If the Government is not +beaten on the division, the Conservatives will bring forward an +address to the Crown to restrain the Ministers from sacrificing +British interests in Egypt. Button says this is a quite +Constitutional course.</p> + +<p>“Called on Harry Brand, who thinks the Government will be beaten +on the division. He would vote against them himself if he was not +in the Government. ‘There is one man.’ he said, ‘who will be happy +if it goes against us, and that is Hartington. He is sick of +office, and wants to be away amusing himself. As things go worse +for the Government, his spirits rise.’ We walked together in the +Park. I then went on to Stanley of Alderley.<a id= +"FNanchor_59"></a><a href="#Footnote_59" class= +"fnanchor">[59]</a></p> + +<p>“Stanley is quite reconciled to me now, and talks to me as +Mohammedan to Mohammedan, though he warns me still not to speak +evil of the Turks. ‘There is a maxim,’ he says, ‘among Catholics, +that whoever speaks ill of the Jesuits, speaks ill of the Church, +and so it is with the Turks. They are the race which has carried +out the teaching of the prophet in its purity more than any other.’ +I told him I had no quarrel with the Turks except in their +relations with the Arabs, whom they always managed to corrupt, and +I was come to ask his advice about going to Constantinople. I had +been through India, and was<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_242">[242]</span> charged by the Indian Mohammedans to see +the Sultan and lay before him the need of a social and moral reform +for Islam, and to urge him to take the matter up, as Emir el +Mumenin, and to warn him that, if he neglected this duty, the +Indian Mohammedans would fall off from him. He thought the idea a +good one, and that I would be listened to, and he has promised to +come to James Street on Monday at noon, with letters he will write +to Vefyk and Khair-ed-Din Pashas on the subject. I intend, if the +Government is not turned out on the Vote of Censure, to leave for +Paris and Constantinople on Monday evening. Stanley is a good +fellow, and I have known him now for twenty-five years. He knows a +great deal about Islam, but his ideas are all confused, and he has +no knowledge of the Arabs. He tells me he was never in India—only +in Ceylon and Siam, and knows so little of modern ideas in India, +that he had not heard of Seyd Ahmed being charged with rationalism +nor of the rivalry between Abd-el-Latif and Amir Ali at +Calcutta.</p> + +<p>“Lunched at the Gregorys. Later to the House of Commons. +Lymington, whom I met there, said: ‘I am coming to think after all +we should have done better to stick to Arabi.’ Lymington was one of +Gladstone’s strongest supporters at the time of the war.<a id= +"FNanchor_60"></a><a href="#Footnote_60" class= +"fnanchor">[60]</a></p> + +<p>“<em>14th May.</em>—The Government are not turned out. The Irish +waited, as Button said they would, till the last minute, and then +voted against the Government, but nevertheless there remained a +majority of twenty-eight. I don’t know whether to be glad or sorry, +but I think on the whole I am glad. The measure of their iniquity +is not yet full. Called on Button. Natty Rothschild is +selling<span class="pagenum" id="Page_243">[243]</span> Egyptian +stock. He sold £150,000 Preference Stock yesterday. Button thinks +it will end by a partial repudiation when the Conference meets.</p> + +<p>“Met Lascelles<a id="FNanchor_61"></a><a href="#Footnote_61" +class="fnanchor">[61]</a> in the evening at St. James’s Club. +Talking about Gordon, he said he had always been a man of violent +temper, and what he had done lately at Khartoum was nothing more +than what he had always done. Nubar said of him long ago: ‘He reads +the Bible all the morning—and then gets up and orders a man to be +hanged.’ Gordon’s idea on leaving England had been to convert the +Soudanese to Christianity. His (Lascelles’) brother-in-law, the +Bishop of Exeter (Dr. Temple), had told him that Gordon had called +on him to ask whether he considered that the Soudanese converts +might be allowed to keep three wives. The Bishop had thought this +would be uncanonical.<a id="FNanchor_62"></a><a href="#Footnote_62" +class="fnanchor">[62]</a> Lascelles has been in Bulgaria several +years superintending the growth of liberty there, and we might do +worse than have him Consul General at Cairo. He says he has been +much disappointed in Nubar. Sherif, he says, is a good companion, +but without ideas. Riaz, when he first came into office, was under +the influence of Gabriel Charmes, who when he wanted him to do +anything used to tell him M. Thiers would have done it in his +place. But they quarrelled at last, Charmes wanting something which +Riaz would not give, and Riaz answering that M. Thiers would have +said no.</p> + +<p>“<em>17th May.</em>—Went down to Crabbet with Tommy Bowles, the +Editor of ‘Vanity Fair.’<a id="FNanchor_63"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_63" class="fnanchor">[63]</a> He is thinking of starting +a new political newspaper to be called<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_244">[244]</span> ‘The Statesman,’ or, ‘The Précis Writer,’ +and wants me to assist him, but I would not promise. He told a good +story about Disraeli, who, having ventured some more than usually +daring lie in Parliament, was walking home afterwards with Monty +Corry.<a id="FNanchor_64"></a><a href="#Footnote_64" class= +"fnanchor">[64]</a> Monty congratulated him on nobody having found +him out, and called it a special interposition of Providence. +‘Yes,’ said Dizzy, ‘God is great, and He seems to me to get greater +and greater every day.’</p> + +<p>[N.B.—With regard to my offer of mediation, through +Jemal-ed-Din, with the Mahdi—an offer which I still believe might +at that date, May, have saved the disaster of Gordon’s death—it is +worth noting that the decision of the Government refusing it was +delayed until after Lord Cromer’s arrival from Egypt in London, +which seems to fix on Lord Cromer the departmental responsibility +of the refusal, and with it of the loss of whatever chance there +was of a peaceful solution. It was then already too late in the +season to send an English army up the Nile before the rising of the +river.]</p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_245">[245]</span><a id= +"c08"></a>CHAPTER VIII</h2> + +<p class="sch1">MY EXCLUSION FROM EGYPT</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">“<em>19th May</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="nind space-above15"><span class="dcap2">“I</span> WAS to +have gone to Paris to-day, but, besides that I am far from well, +Lord Granville’s answer has come, shortly refusing to interfere. +This will oblige me to take action, and so I have put off my +journey. Perhaps it is as well.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th May.</em>—To London, and saw Stanley, who has given me +good letters of introduction to Vefyk and Khair-ed-Din Pashas. In +them he says he was not able to approve my ideas of two years ago +about Egypt, but that I have returned now from India with saner +ones, and that we are agreed as to the residence of Europeans in +Africa and Asia; also that I have been prevented by the English +authorities from landing in Egypt.</p> + +<p>“Tried to find Churchill about bringing my case forward in +Parliament, but he was out, and I think now I will first write to +Gladstone, giving him warning of what I intend, and so leaving a +last loophole for peace. Lady Gregory is all for this. She tells me +Layard told Sir William that a high official of the Foreign Office +had said quite recently that though it would be a bitter pill they +would have to restore Arabi before long. But I doubt it while +Gladstone remains in office.</p> + +<p>“To Mrs. S.’s, a garden party. Mme. de Novikoff was there. She +has been in communication with the ex-Khedive Ismaïl, who has got +her to advocate his return to Egypt.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st May.</em>—To Button’s, and arranged our plan of +campaign. If my letter to Gladstone comes to<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_246">[246]</span> nothing, the ‘Times’ will print one from +me telling the story of my exclusion from Egypt. He thinks it +should be brought forward in the Lords instead of the Commons, and +we think Marlborough would be a good man to do it. Then I went to +Knowles and fortunately found him at home. I told him I was going +to bring the case forward in Parliament, and might be obliged to +quote Gladstone’s intention last year of restoring Arabi. He did +not like this, and backed out of having told me more than that it +had been his impression that Mr. Gladstone had such an idea, or +that he might have had it if it had become popular. This is nothing +more than I had expected of Knowles; he is evidently in a great +fright of being compromised. I promised not to bring his name in if +I could help it—but I might be driven into doing it.</p> + +<p>“To Crabbet with Admiral Tryon, a lovely day spent among the +horses.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd May.</em>—Crabbet. Knowles must have gone straight to +Eddy Hamilton, for by this morning’s post I get a letter from Eddy +evidently in a great fright, saying he cannot believe I am going to +bring him into the matter, that his conversation with me last year +went no farther than wishing me <em>bon voyage</em>, and that he is +quite innocent of representing Mr. Gladstone in any way. I must +expect both him and Knowles to swear hard. But I have got the +substance of my conversation with Eddy in this journal, and of that +with Knowles in my letters of the time. Moreover, I have Eddy’s +letter received at Bombay, speaking of himself as ‘conduit pipe,’ +between me and head-quarters. He must have forgotten this last. +Eddy won’t be injured by it. They will give him a fat permanent +post when they have made a scapegoat of him, but I have written to +him<span class="pagenum" id="Page_247">[247]</span> to say that if +he likes I will refer the whole thing to Mr. Gladstone instead of +to Parliament. I hope they will accept this as I don’t want to +break with Mr. Gladstone if I can help it, and I should be grieved +to have a row with Eddy.</p> + +<p>“<em>25th May.</em>—Crabbet. Eddy accepts a reference to Mr. +Gladstone, and I think nothing could be better. Harry Brand came +down; we rode in the forest and talked politics all day. Talking +about Gordon, he told me that Gladstone had not seen him before he +was sent out, nor was there any Cabinet Council; the thing was +settled by a committee of the Cabinet, consisting of Hartington, +Northbrook, and Dilke. Gladstone was only told that an engineer +officer had been sent to Khartoum to report. Harry had expostulated +with Hartington about the mission, and had urged that Gordon should +be stopped at Korusko, but was told it was too late. Baring was +unfriendly to Gordon, having quarrelled with him four years ago +when he was Controller; they had called each other names. He says +nothing has been decided yet at the War Office about an expedition. +They will decide nothing till they hear from Gordon. He thinks the +Souakin route impossible for an army. A contractor has offered to +run water in pipes, to be condensed at the sea-side.</p> + +<p>“<em>26th May.</em>—Lunched with Lady Gregory. Gladstone has +been saying that he can’t understand why people find fault with the +Turks, who are very good people. The ‘Pall Mall Gazette’ publishes +‘Mr. Wilfrid Blunt on the crisis in Egypt.’</p> + +<p>“<em>27th May.</em>—Wrote a long letter to Gladstone, giving a +full account of the Knowles and Hamilton interviews last year (see +<a href="#Page_588">Appendix</a>).</p> + +<p>“<em>28th May.</em>—Crabbet. Derby Day. Drove to<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_248">[248]</span> Epsom. Harry Brand joined us +in the evening. He says it is quite untrue that any arrangement has +been made with the Turks for their help in the Soudan, also I ought +to have come and seen him about Gordon, as he would have brought me +to speak with Hartington, who is mainly responsible for Gordon’s +having gone out, and so is most concerned in getting him back.</p> + +<p>“<em>29th May.</em>—Frederic Harrison came down. We had a +pleasant discussion at dinner and afterwards about the situation, +only he takes the English instead of the Egyptian point of view. He +said he was not averse to war under <em>all</em> circumstances, and +thought England would lose morally if she left Egypt ruined to the +French or to Europe. He says, however, annexation is the only +logical result of our Egyptian policy. He approves my letter to the +‘Times.’</p> + +<p>“<em>30th May.</em>—The Oaks Day. Drove Harry Brand and Harrison +to Epsom, an odd party, in an odd turn out—the phaeton and four +Arabs. We did the sixteen and a half miles from the Lodge Gate at +Crabbet to the top of Epsom Hill in one hour and thirty-two +minutes, our best record yet. And one hour and thirty-three minutes +coming home. Bozra had been only in harness three times before, and +never in the team.</p> + +<p>“<em>31st May.</em>—To London and saw Button, who says that, +whatever Harry Brand may say, the Sultan proposed not long ago to +send troops to the Soudan, and that his offer was accepted—but +coupled with the condition, that as a proof of his sincerity he +should send a thousand men to Suakin in ten days. This he declined. +Gladstone has published an article signed G. in the ‘Fortnightly,’ +which, if really his, seems dangerously like handing over Egypt to +the French, or to a European administrative control, +the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_249">[249]</span> very worst +thing that could happen. Button highly approves of my letter to +Gladstone, and I have sent it in. I went, however, first to Palace +Green to get my letters to Mrs. Howard for reference. They are +quite satisfactory as to my interview with Knowles. I am now in a +position, if necessary, to prove my account of what he said, and I +think I have them all in a wonderful fix.</p> + +<p>“Lunched at the Club with Edward Sartoris, and passed through +St. James’s Square, where there was a considerable crowd looking at +the effects of the dynamite explosion. [A series of dynamite +explosions attributed to the Fenians.] Nothing more than a few +broken windows as the material effect, but the moral ones are +great. Harry was very indignant this morning when he read the +account of it, and with me for saying that it was due to the +wickedness of the Government.</p> + +<p>“<em>1st June.</em>—Crabbet. Began a letter to the ‘Times.’ The +gist of it is, that if Mr. Gladstone really hands over Egypt +unconditionally to Europe, it means handing it over to the +bondholders, and handing it over to the bondholders means the +driving out of the Egyptians in favour of European colonists. I +cannot believe Mr. Gladstone, after all his protestation of giving +the Egyptians their liberty, would do this. I imagine, instead, he +must be contemplating the securing of terms for them first from +Europe, and establishing a Government at Cairo, strong because +supported by the people, and then withdrawing his troops. I put +forward the rival claims of Ismaïl, Halim, and Arabi. One thing is +clear in Egypt. The legend of Tewfik’s loyalty has been spoilt. He +is loyal still perhaps—but no longer <em>to us</em>.</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd June.</em>—Began a series of articles for the +‘Fortnightly,’ called ‘Ideas about India.’</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_250">[250]</span>“<em>3rd +June.</em>—Button has given me the whole history of the G. article +in the ‘Fortnightly.’ It appears that Escott, the ‘Fortnightly’ +Editor, sent it to Buckle directing his attention to it, and saying +it was from the pen of one of our most prominent statesmen, and +that it represented Mr. Gladstone’s views. Buckle gave it to his +article writer, who, before committing himself, wrote to Escott +saying he concluded the author of the article to be Mr. Gladstone, +and that if so, he should be happy to give it all prominence, but +wished to know whether he was correct. To this Escott replied that +the author was out of town, and that the article might be accepted +as representing Mr. Gladstone’s views. Button thinks it is Godley, +but I am nearly certain it is Herbert Gladstone, who is often used +to air his father’s most advanced ideas. Button tells me that an +expedition is to start shortly for Khartoum, as the military +authorities are of opinion that it will be less dangerous now than +later, when the Nile rises. They are to go from Suakin to Berber, +and will lose about half their force.</p> + +<p>“Dined with Admiral Tryon, and had a talk with Owen Burne about +India. He is the head of the Secret Department at the India Office, +and I fancy had his eye on me during my late journey. We talked +about everything, however, very pleasantly. He expressed his +opinion that the native armies ought to be made more use of than +they have hitherto been. He knew Scindia and Holkar well, and they +had repeatedly proposed to lend their troops on condition of being +given rank in the Imperial Army. We also talked about Hyderabad. He +takes Cordery’s view about things there, of course. Like every one +here, he is astonished to learn that Lord Ripon is a success or +popular with anybody.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_251">[251]</span>“<em>4th +June.</em>—Down to Crabbet. The Frederic Harrisons and John Morley +came and we had a long political discussion till midnight. Morley +says it is a necessity of the English commercial system that the +field of their enterprise should be constantly enlarged. For this +reason he thinks we shall not leave Egypt, and he thinks something +new must be devised there. He is for a strong Government no matter +what—Riaz, if you can get no better—and he would allow the cutting +off of heads or anything. Marat, he says, is his idea of a man for +revolutionary times. He does not see his way to Arabi, does not +understand his merits as a statesman. But I think he wishes me +well. He said: ‘Why don’t you persuade Gladstone to send you to +Egypt?’ I said: ‘I would do so if I could get to see him.’ He and +Harrison had an interesting talk about the various statesmen of the +day. Chamberlain, Morley thinks, is the man of the future—a true +Radical and one who would never change; he would ‘put Burt<a id= +"FNanchor_65"></a><a href="#Footnote_65" class="fnanchor">[65]</a> +in office, if he had the chance,’ he had a strong will and ideas. +Dilke was only a sham Radical; Dilke was too much a man of the +world, wanted to please everybody; he had seen his best political +day, and would be merged in Chamberlain’s individuality. The danger +was that, when a Radical Cabinet came to office, the two would +divide Home and Foreign policy between them, when Dilke would play +every kind of Jingo prank. Morley has a great opinion of Parnell, +who, he says, is a powerful man and a patriot. Gladstone thinks +highly of him too. When the Phoenix Park murders took place, +Parnell wrote to Gladstone to say that if he, Gladstone, thought it +would do any good or relieve the situation, he would retire +from<span class="pagenum" id="Page_252">[252]</span> public life; +he was disgusted at the murders. This Mr. Gladstone told Morley +himself. Dillon too was a patriot. Healy had only a blind hatred of +England. The rest were second rate men. Dillon had written to +Morley lately from California as follows: ‘Dear Morley. You said a +year ago that English troops would be out of Egypt. Yours truly.’ +Salisbury would be a great force if he was in the House of Commons; +he would like to abolish the House of Lords so as to get into the +other House. Hicks Beach was much the best man the Opposition had +in the front bench; he always reasoned out his arguments. Plunket +was their best speaker. Gibson was tiresome, Northcote a noodle. +Gladstone had a supreme contempt for Northcote. Morley has a high +opinion of Churchill; thinks he may come over yet to the Radicals; +he had the talent of interesting, was industrious, kind-hearted, +and wonderfully quick. Hartington was weak, had no fixed opinion or +power of will or decision; he was an excellent critic, but with no +initiative. He thinks Lawson and Labouchere have ruined the +Egyptian cause by their jokes—people were afraid of seeming to +agree with them. Trevelyan was a success, and deservedly so. +Lefevre would always be unpopular. For Granville Morley has a +‘supreme contempt’—he can find no other word.</p> + +<p>“<em>5th June.</em>—I drove Morley to the station in the +morning. He seems much in agreement with me about Egypt, and I hope +he may make his agreement known to others. I gave him Lyall’s +letter<a id="FNanchor_66"></a><a href="#Footnote_66" class= +"fnanchor">[66]</a> to read and my two letters from Egypt to Eddy +Hamilton, and explained to him something of my idea how to govern +Egypt. He said he was all for<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_253">[253]</span> strong measures now, hanging if necessary. +If we could only get Morley to declare himself it would be most +important, but he says the weak part of our programme is Arabi. +Perhaps it is.</p> + +<p>“Lady Gregory came down in the afternoon, and the Harrisons +stayed on. Harrison interests me, being a thoroughly honest good +fellow. Morley told us this morning a great deal about Stead, his +successor in the ‘Pall Mall Gazette.’ Stead was only a clerk at so +many shillings a week to start with, and came straight to the ‘Pall +Mall’ from a small northern paper. He was a man of entire belief in +himself, a good deal of imagination, and not a little superstition; +a believer in dreams and inspirations. On one occasion in the +autumn of 1882 he sent Morley a message, saying he wanted to see +him on important business. This was to tell him that, having gone +for a cruise round the Isle of Wight, he had had a sudden +inspiration just off the Needles to the effect that Morley would be +in Parliament and have left the ‘Pall Mall’ by the following March. +When it happened, Stead had taken it entirely as a matter of +course; he has boundless ambition, and has it as a maxim that a +newspaper Editor is stronger than any Minister. Morley looks upon +him as a political quack. He, Morley, eschews the ‘Pall Mall’ now +and all its works.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th June.</em>—My letter is in the ‘Times’ and reads well, +and I have written to Arabi to warn him that perhaps he will be +proposed to shortly to return, and to ask him whether he would be +prepared to serve as Regent for a term of years with Tewfik’s son +in minority. Harrison went away and has promised to write in +support of me to the ‘Times.’</p> + +<p>“<em>7th June.</em>—The ‘Times’ has some polite +words<span class="pagenum" id="Page_254">[254]</span> about my +letter in its leading article. Button writes that the letter has +been a great success—the best I have ever written. It will have +made one or two people at the Foreign Office angry. But Mrs. +Gladstone asks us to her party next week, the first time since the +war.</p> + +<p>“<em>9th June.</em>—Harrison’s letter is in the ‘Times,’ and one +from Edwin Arnold in something the same sense. On the other hand, +Morley publishes a letter to his constituents, which may read any +way about Egypt. It does not leave a good impression.</p> + +<p>“Button tells me that an agreement was come to on Friday between +Granville and Waddington about Egypt to the following effect: (1) +That an International Control Audit should be established; (2) That +English troops should remain in Egypt for three years; and (3) That +England should advance eight million sterling. Hartington, Dilke, +and Chamberlain are violently opposed to the arrangement; and it is +from Hartington that the ‘Times’ has lately been receiving its +information as to the negotiations.</p> + +<p>“Dined with Frank Lascelles, who has been staying at Chatsworth, +and he confirms what Button says of Hartington’s dislike of the +arrangement. According to Button, Hartington would have left the +Government but for his father, who declared that it was the boast +and glory of his family that no member of it had ever voted with +the Tories. Fidelity to party was his first principle. Lascelles +has seen Baring lately, who tells him he is going back to Egypt +after the Conference, to go on trying to prove that ‘two and two +make something more than four.’ Lascelles was at some pains to +prove to me that Arabi might yet act with Tewfik. Eddy was at +the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_255">[255]</span> club dining at +another table, and we agreed, whatever happened in the matter of my +exclusion from Egypt, we would not quarrel. I am to have an answer +from Mr. Gladstone to-morrow. The ‘Pall Mall’ published late in the +evening a special edition giving the terms of the agreement with +France pretty much as Button gave them.</p> + +<p>“<em>10th June.</em>—The ‘Daily News’ contradicts in vague +language the terms of the agreement. But Button declares they are +true all the same, and, what is more, that Bismarck has refused to +allow any diminution on the interest of the unified debt. This he +had from Natty Rothschild. He says the Government will certainly be +turned out. The Opposition are doing all they can to hasten the +Franchise Bill, which they will pass through the Lords, and then +bring on the Egyptian Question in the form of an Appeal to the +Crown. Then there will be a dissolution, and the Tories, if in +office, will be able to have a redistribution of seats exactly as +they like to supplement the Bill; it would be a mistake in tactics +to throw out the Bill. Once passed, the Liberals would have no cry +at all to go to the country on. But I fancy their cry would be the +fear of an European war.</p> + +<p>“Called on Lawson and persuaded him to oppose the Government +arrangement, about which he was in doubt, I hope, successfully. +There is nothing now but to turn out the Government. Lord Salisbury +will not dare annex. Harry Brand writes ‘Annexation and war are in +the possible future.’</p> + +<p>“Went to see Mrs. Howard. She tells me George is furious against +the Government. And he has told the Government whip that, if any +terms have been agreed to with France at all like those just +published, he and many of his friends will vote against<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_256">[256]</span> the Government, adding that +for himself he would not present himself for re-election in case of +a dissolution. She is entirely in agreement with my last letter to +the ‘Times,’ and so it seems is George. We discussed Morley and +Harrison. Morley I expect found the arrangement with France +concluded when he got back to London, and has probably been told +that a defeat of the Government would mean war. Hence his letter, +but he is evidently a trimmer. The letter reads both ways, and they +will probably give him office if they ride out the storm.</p> + +<p>“Gladstone’s answer has come. He says that ‘in his opinion it is +impossible that any friend of his could without the grossest error +of judgement have given me any ground for the supposition that he +was favourable to any restoration of the exiles to Egypt.’ This is +not a denial. He goes on to say that ‘without questioning in any +way my intentions or my honour, he has deplored my proceedings in +Egypt, as alike injurious to Egyptian and British interests.’ I am +writing to thank him for the courteous tone of his answer, and do +not propose to bring the matter before Parliament until after the +present crisis. Harrison is much disgusted with Morley for backing +out of his agreement with us.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th June.</em>—To Mrs. Gladstone’s party. The Grand Old +Man came forward in a hearty manner, and shook me warmly by the +hand, saying with emphasis, ‘How do you do, Mr. Blunt. I am very +glad indeed to see you.’ He has a hand which reminds me of Cardinal +Newman’s, when seven years ago the Cardinal cured my toothache with +its touch, soft, warm, and nervous. He is looking uncommonly well, +and as alert and cheerful as if he was going to heaven instead of +head over heels into perdition before the end of next week. I had +some words<span class="pagenum" id="Page_257">[257]</span> with Mr. +Forster,<a id="FNanchor_67"></a><a href="#Footnote_67" class= +"fnanchor">[67]</a> who said he had read and agreed with my letter +in the ‘Times.’ He talked over the chances, too, of turning out the +Ministry, evidently hoping to do so. He is an ugly roughish-looking +man, but I can imagine may have power. I am glad to have had these +few words with him, but the crowd was too great for much talk. Lady +Gregory overheard Dilke saying, ‘The Arabi Party is strong here +to-night. I have seen both Blunt and Gregory.’ Baring was +there.</p> + +<p>“<em>12th June.</em>—Saw Lascelles at the Club. He does not +expect to get sent to Egypt, and thinks Baring will go back there. +But it all depends on the Ministerial crisis. Dined at Lord De la +Warr’s. I had rather expected to meet Ismaïl, the ex-Khedive, but +found only his representative, Broadley, who tells me that Ismaïl +is hurt at my description of him in my ‘Times’ letter, but wants to +see me. I have no objection, though it cannot lead to anything. +Arabi will have nothing to do with him, and Ismaïl has hardly any +chance at all of getting back to Egypt.</p> + +<p>“<em>13th June.</em>—Called on Button. He tells me the +Government mean to stand to their guns about the arrangement with +France, and will be beaten. With him was a man Gordon’s friends are +sending to Khartoum to carry letters and newspapers. He is to have +£500 and go in disguise as a Morocco merchant by way of Korosko. I +cross-questioned him a good deal about his plans, which are all +based on the notion that the Mahdi’s movement is a ‘trumpery +insurrection’; so he will come to grief, unless indeed he is wise +enough to put the £500 in his pocket and go off and amuse himself +with it at Monaco, a result far from unlikely, to judge by his +looks.</p> + +<p>“<em>16th June.</em>—Lytton writes answering my +proposal<span class="pagenum" id="Page_258">[258]</span> to go for +a night to Knebworth. He says my political ideas about Egypt and +India disgust him, but hopes to see me all the same. So I am going, +under promise to say nothing about politics. This is quite fair. +Lytton’s position is a perfectly logical one, and I cannot expect +him either to sympathize or tolerate.</p> + +<p>“To Knebworth. Nobody staying in the house but Miss Lyall and +Sinnett, the Apostle of Theosophy. Politics being barred, our talk +has been almost all on occult sciences. Sinnett seems a worthy, if +not a very wise, man, with considerable humility and naïvety. He +was formerly Editor of the ‘Pioneer’ in India, and there became +acquainted with certain Oriental mystics. Practically, however, his +system is undistinguishable from ordinary spiritualism, and the +real manager is Madame Blavatsky. In this lady he has a profound +belief, and told us of various trifling miracles she is in the +habit of working. She can make bells ring in the air—and, by +holding her hand to a pane of glass, can produce tapping noises. +She discovered once a cup and saucer in the ground at a picnic, and +can make electric sparks pass through his head. He is distinctly of +opinion that she has lived in other forms, before her present life, +and that she knows her own past history. But she has not told him +of it, and, such is the secrecy of these sublime adepts, that if he +were to ask her about it, she would be obliged to tell him an +untruth. He gave us a recipe, which he called a very simple one, +for obtaining the services of a <em>genius</em>. You must make +acquaintance with a sick man near his end, and persuade him that +you are his best friend, and get him to entrust to you his last +wishes, as also some article of property—such as a ring to which he +is attached, and you must promise<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_259">[259]</span> him to perform his wish. He must then die, +with anxiety regarding it and regarding you upon his mind, and you +must be careful to deceive him and leave his wish unperformed. Then +he will return to you through the instrumentality of the ring in +hope of urging you to fulfil your promise, and will do all your +bidding. This is a black and immoral art, but he assured us +exceedingly simple of execution. The high adepts scorn to practise +it.</p> + +<p>“<em>19th June.</em>—A capital speech of Churchill’s to-day +reported from Aylesbury. I have written to congratulate him, and +exhort him to take up the mantle of honesty let drop by Mr. +Gladstone.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th June.</em>—Lunched with the Howards. George is quite +converted now from his belief in Gladstone, and looks upon him as +completely dishonest. He dined at Downing Street two days ago with +other M.P.s, and says the party, notwithstanding all, will vote +solid for the Ministry, all but a few members, himself among them. +But even he is not, as I understand, going to vote against them. +The fact is there is no opposition which can undertake the +Government, and the Government can do as it likes.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd June.</em>—Our annual Lawn Tennis Tournament at +Crabbet. There were there Godfrey Webb, Eddy Hamilton, Button, +Sandys, Nigel Kingscote, Harry Brand and his brother Artie, Frank +Lascelles, Mallock, Elcho, and others. We had a merry evening with +songs. Eddy, who sat next me, talked pretty freely about Egypt, and +I gather they would give a good deal to find some excuse there for +getting rid of the Khedive. ‘He has been cunning enough,’ Eddy +said, ‘to stick to us, and we are bound to him.’</p> + +<p>“<em>23rd June.</em>—To London, and lunched with Lawson, and +went down with him afterwards to the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_260">[260]</span> House. Churchill, whom I met in the lobby, +says that Arabi’s only chance lies in the agreement with France +being upset. He is pleased with the letter I wrote him. Morley +still professes not to have made up his mind. Ponsonby got me into +the Gallery. Gladstone was in good form, as I believe he always is +when he has a statement to make, and he did it with dignity if not +with any great eloquence. He talked a good deal about France’s +interests in Egypt, and our own interests, and Europe’s interests, +but never a word for good or evil of the Egyptians’ interests, +never a word but one, and that sounded like an afterthought, and +passed without remark. But there was a great deal about the +principle which would be decided at the Conference, by which I +suppose he meant the principle of the European concert—for every +other has been thrown to the winds. My programme has been followed +on every point, except that of doing justice to the Egyptians. +Egypt is to be neutralized, the Suez Canal neutralized, the Soudan +separated from Egypt—all as I recommended, but no lowering of the +interest on the debt, no re-establishment of popular government. +Morley tells me all that it is proposed to do is to lower the +interest one half per cent., and even that is not certain.</p> + +<p>“Button declares that Bismarck will not allow any reduction. His +position is this. He had a quarrel some time ago with the Frankfort +Rothschilds, and he is glad now to be able to prove to them that he +is real arbiter on the Nile, and they have come to him on their +hands and knees, and he will support their demand for the whole +pound of flesh because they demand it, caring of course nothing +about the results to them, and glad to break down the Anglo-French +agreement. Therefore there is good chance of the<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_261">[261]</span> Conference collapsing as soon +as it meets. The Opposition was feebler in the Debate than anything +I could have imagined. Northcote was like an old woman afraid of +responsibility, and Randolph played into Gladstone’s hands by +making a violent and foolish speech against France. When I say +foolish, I mean foolish under the circumstances, for it had some +good hits, as when he compared Gladstone to Charles II kept on the +throne by Louis XIV as his servant. But it was not in harmony with +the feeling of the House; and Lascelles, who dined to-night with +Forster, tells me they consider Churchill’s speech to have gained +votes for the Government. But they look to no vote being taken till +after the Conference as their best chance of upsetting the +agreement. Goschen made this point good.</p> + +<p>“<em>24th June.</em>—Went down home to Crabbet. There is nothing +more I can do now in Egyptian matters, and for the moment I had +better pay attention to my horses. If we win the Arab race at +Newmarket it will do more for my ideas than half a dozen victories +of the Mahdi. Lord Bradford comes down this week with Ebrington to +see the stud. He wants mares to put to his horse Chippendale.</p> + +<p>“<em>25th June.</em>—To a party at Devonshire House where I +talked principally to Mrs. Howard. She has been converted back to +Gladstone by hearing the debate the other night. George, however, +holds out and is likely to be alone in the cave with Forster when +it comes to a division.</p> + +<p>“<em>26th June.</em>—I hear from Button that the Opposition has +decided on a new Vote of Censure before the Conference, or rather +while the Conference is sitting, being moved thereto by Randolph, +who had threatened to move one himself. Labouchere tells me the +Government, or at least certain members of<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_262">[262]</span> the Cabinet, are riding for a fall, and +that Randolph wants to make it impossible for the Conservatives to +come in. He wants me to get Abdu over from Paris as a sort of +representative of the National Party during the Conference. +Bismarck, Button tells me, will agree to a reduction of the Unified +if Ferry agrees, but only ½ per cent., and it is doubtful whether +they can get even this. The Unified Stock is held in France, +Germany, and Italy, the Preference in England. It is a hopeless +state of things whichever way one looks.</p> + +<p>“<em>28th June.</em>—Lunched at the Carlton with Churchill and +Wolff. Churchill is very angry about something or another, and says +he is going away, and shall have nothing more to do with Parliament +this Session. He talked of Northcote as ‘an old blackguard.’</p> + +<p>“<em>30th June.</em>—To Newmarket for Lord Falmouth’s sale. His +brood mares were magnificent, the finest according to my ideas +being Palmflower, Spinaway, Chevisaunce, and Jeannette. +Wheel-of-Fortune is less taking. Of the stallions the one I should +have chosen to breed from is Kingcraft. We dined with the Clay +Seymers, Lord Wolverton and young Leigh there.<a id= +"FNanchor_68"></a><a href="#Footnote_68" class= +"fnanchor">[68]</a></p> + +<p>“<em>1st July.</em>—First day of the July meeting. The racing +did not interest me. After it we went to Lord Calthorpe’s paddocks, +and saw Petrarch, the handsomest horse in the world. We are staying +with Button in St. Mary’s Square. He tells me the Vote of Censure +has been shelved.</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd July.</em>—The long looked for day of the Arab race, +but somehow I felt less excited about it than when years ago we ran +Yellow Boy at Gibraltar. The weather was perfect, and all the world +and his wife<span class="pagenum" id="Page_263">[263]</span> were +there. They say the July course was never so crowded, and there was +quite a mob to see the Arabs stripped, so that Geheimniss, who was +walking over for the July Cup, passed absolutely unnoticed through +the crowd. I was satisfied with the look of all the horses—and +especially of Halfa, my own entry, who was much admired, but I did +not see Admiral Tryon’s horse at all, for he was brought in quite +at the end, and as soon as they had started on their canter, we +rode to the corner to see the race. Jem Lowther was there also on +horseback, very genial, and, while we were waiting, we talked about +the ‘awful mess’ in Egypt. Then we saw the horses coming in a +cluster at a tremendous pace over the hill, beyond the fir trees, +and we cantered back towards the paddock. They overtook us at the +bottom of the hill, and to my grief and surprise I saw it was all +over with Halfa, and what seemed to be the Indian horses going on +alone, with Rataplan well up. I felt that I had suffered a +disastrous defeat, but was a little consoled by finding that after +all a home bred three year old, though not mine, had won. This was +Admiral Tryon’s Asil; Dictator second; Rataplan, who had been +making the running for Halfa, third.</p> + +<p>“I fear, nevertheless, the race will be considered a failure as +most of the young ones were left behind, and there are suspicions +with regard to Tryon’s horse, whether he is really an Arab. After +the race, Jousiffe, Dictator’s trainer, came to me as representing +his owner, and wanted me to raise an objection to Asil on this +score, but I refused point blank to listen to anything of the sort. +I was at Aleppo when Henderson, the Consul there, bought Asil’s dam +for Tryon, and though I did not see her, nor can vouch for her +pedigree, I think there can be no conceivable doubt<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_264">[264]</span> she was an Arab; she stood +15.2, but such a height is possible, though I never saw it in the +desert. She was in foal, Tryon says, to Henderson’s Abeyan Sherrak +horse, whom I know well, and the colt was dropped a few days after +landing in England. Besides, Asil is in the Stud Book as an Arab +and so is legally an Arab, whatever he may be in fact. It would in +any case be fatal to have a dispute on such a question this first +race, and I am glad my horse, or rather Abd-el-Rahman’s, was +second, so as to prevent other action—but I will see the horse.</p> + +<p>“Dined with Button and two of the Paulets, and George +Wyndham.<a id="FNanchor_69"></a><a href="#Footnote_69" class= +"fnanchor">[69]</a> A very young man’s party.</p> + +<p>“<em>3rd July.</em>—The sporting papers are down on the race as +childish, because the Arabs did not beat English horses, and I fear +the Jockey Club will not have the courage to repeat it; but Hawfa +Williams, the manager of Sandown, has promised a race there for the +22nd. We called this morning at Hopper’s stables and saw Asil. +Anything less like an Arab horse I never saw. He is long, low, +strong, rather coarse, and very slack over the loins—like an +English horse—his head plain but well set on, great hocks and arms. +I don’t wonder at Jousiffe wanting me to object to him.”</p> + +<p>This failure at Newmarket was a great disappointment to me at +the time. I had counted on proving, by a practical demonstration, +that Arab horses bred in England, and properly trained, would +greatly improve in speed as compared with those bred in the desert. +The race, however, seemed to show the contrary, as, with the +exception of Tryon’s colt, the two Arab horses brought from India +had it all their own way. Moreover, a little later, Tryon matched +his colt against an inferior English thoroughbred,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_265">[265]</span> and was handsomely beaten. The +ultimate result, however, was not I think, as far as Arab breeding +in England was affected by it, wholly a misfortune. It convinced me +that I was on wrong lines in breeding Arabs for speed, and not for +those more valuable qualities in which their true excellence lies. +Had I continued with my original purpose, I should have lost time +and money, and probably have also spoiled my breed, producing +stock, taller perhaps and speedier, but with the same defects found +in the English thoroughbred. Politically, however, I no doubt lost +something through the publicity of my Newmarket experience. For +success on the turf seems always to have been held in England as in +some measure connected with political capacity, and if I had been +able to prove my point with the sporting world, my opinion on +Eastern affairs generally would have gained in credit.</p> + +<p>“There seems every prospect of the Conference breaking down.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th July.</em>—Lunched with Lady Gregory and on to the +Howards. Mrs. Howard asked me why I thought that England would be +obliged to see decent Government given to Egypt if we acknowledged +a Protectorate, and I said, ‘If you invite a young lady to dine +with you at Greenwich you don’t look too closely how she +behaves—but when you have married her you take care she dresses +respectably.’</p> + +<p>“<em>7th July.</em>—Another letter from me in the ‘Times,’ and +also one from Benson Maxwell (both about Egypt), and there is a +leading article sufficiently polite to me. Called on Bruce,<a id= +"FNanchor_70"></a><a href="#Footnote_70" class="fnanchor">[70]</a> +who is expected to move the Vote of Censure—a fairly sensible man, +but without go or plan of action, like all the rest of<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_266">[266]</span> the Tories; yet he is the best +man they can find for it. No wonder Randolph has his way with them. +He is occupied over head and ears with his National Association and +is tired of Egypt.</p> + +<p>“<em>8th July.</em>—Dined at Wentworth House. Percy and Madeline +were there, and Henry Cowper, and Millais grown very prosy and as +dull as a breeder of cattle. I sat between Lady Wharncliffe and Sir +Wilfrid Lawson, the latter very amusing, with a fire of good +stories, kept up all dinner-time. He is going to hold an open air +meeting in Hyde Park against the Lords—and asked me to join in it. +But the Lords to my mind are a very respectable institution, and I +care nothing at all for the Franchise Bill which they are throwing +out.</p> + +<p>“<em>9th July.</em>—The Lords threw the Bill out last night, and +there is likely to be a row, but no dissolution. Marlborough’s +first speech the other night was a failure. People were interested +to hear him, but found his speech dull, and after the first ten +minutes began to talk.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th July.</em>—The Mudir of Dongola, it seems certain now, +has joined the Mahdi, and Berber is as certainly taken, while there +are rumours, too, of the fall of Khartoum. I have written to +Hyndman, in answer to a letter of his asking me to join the +Democratic Socialists. This of course I cannot do.</p> + +<p>“<em>12th July.</em>—Luncheon with the Gregorys, where I met +Rowsell, the Domains Commissioner just from Cairo. His view of the +situation there is that the Mahdi will be at Cairo in the autumn. I +asked him about Tewfik, and he said: ‘Tewfik has intelligence +enough to know that he has no friends, and is fatalistic enough to +let things take their course. He will sit twiddling his thumbs from +right to left, till he is told to begin twiddling them from left to +right.’ I<span class="pagenum" id="Page_267">[267]</span> asked him +what he would himself do when the Mahdi came to Cairo. He said: +‘Turn Mussulman of course.’</p> + +<p>“To Mrs. Buxton’s, near Weybridge, to meet George Trevelyan. The +place is prettily situated on the edge of Wisley Heath, now grown +over with fir trees. I remember it thirty years ago, absolutely +bare, when we used as boys to go to the Hut Pond from Horsley to +fish. At Waterloo Station was George Howard. He has seen Goschen, +who would like to talk to me in the morning about Egypt, or rather +to hear me talk. Goschen says I am an imprudent person who, if you +tell anything to him, and he has reason to be dissatisfied with you +afterwards, repeats what you tell him. I will go to him, but I +trust him as little as he trusts me.</p> + +<p>“George Trevelyan<a id="FNanchor_71"></a><a href="#Footnote_71" +class="fnanchor">[71]</a> is a capital fellow—very lively and +amusing. I had a long talk with him after dinner. He made me +explain to him the whole history of the Revolution in Egypt, and +especially of the Joint Note of January, 1882, as he wanted, he +said, to arrive at a knowledge of the exact moment where our policy +made a mistake. He was of course quite ignorant even of the general +outline of the story, but seized the points with great +intelligence. He is a man of energy, wit, and sympathy. I asked him +if he could tell me whose idea it was sending Clifford Lloyd to +Egypt, and he said: ‘It was ours, in Ireland. We would have sent +him anywhere to get rid of him.’ His description of Lloyd was +amusing. He was an energetic man of great self sufficiency. To talk +to him you would think him a Clive or a Warren Hastings. But his +whole thought was<span class="pagenum" id="Page_268">[268]</span> +to advertise himself by his vigour. On one occasion he had +telegraphed to Vernon Harcourt, begging him to send him a couple of +bloodhounds to aid his police operations in Ireland. At first they +had thought the telegram a hoax, but it was nevertheless true. +Besides, he was very greedy of pay and allowances, and was always +bothering Lord Spencer to increase these. In the smoking room we +had a general discussion about Ireland, and the possibility of its +independence. Trevelyan has a mean idea of the Irish, and thinks +they could not govern themselves respectably or solvably, but would +relapse into barbarism. I cited the instance of Greece as at least +as hopeless at starting as that of Ireland, and yet it had settled +down and become prosperous. We all agreed anyhow that Ireland in +its present condition was ruining England, and especially the +English Parliament—but Trevelyan does not believe in any true +middle term between coercion and separation.</p> + +<p>“<em>13th July, Sunday.</em>—Had some interesting conversation +with Trevelyan and Sir James Carmichael.<a id= +"FNanchor_72"></a><a href="#Footnote_72" class="fnanchor">[72]</a> +The latter is Childers’ private secretary at the Conference, and he +says that he has had to go over the public accounts of Arabi’s +time, and finds them in a great mess. He complains that, whatever +Arabi’s honesty may have been, great peculation took place under +him. He is, however, wholly opposed to the Turks and Circassians, +and also to English administration in Egypt. He would like to keep +on Tewfik, and give him an Egyptian administration. He described +Nubar well for what he is, and said: ‘His days of office are +numbered.’ Trevelyan described Lord Spencer as the ablest +administrator he had come across, an administrator born, for +he<span class="pagenum" id="Page_269">[269]</span> had had no +training, a man of sense and very high integrity.</p> + +<p>“<em>14th July.</em>—Dined at the Travellers. Next table to me +sat with others Staal, the new Russian Ambassador. It is +twenty-three years since we met, but I knew him again directly. We +were great friends in those days at Athens, and I think he was +really glad to see me when I explained after dinner who I was. ‘Are +you any relation,’ he enquired, ‘to the Blunt who is a friend of +the Mahdi?’ He asked me to come and see him, which I shall do. +Staal is an old man now, but has something of the kind honest +manner of former days. This has given me great pleasure.</p> + +<p>“<em>15th July.</em>—Button tells me that the Lords are +determined to fight on the Franchise Bill. They dare not let the +Bill pass, as it would mean the absolute defeat of the Conservative +Party at the next elections, and Mr. Gladstone’s stay in office for +the rest of his natural life. They mean to hold on then till a +Dissolution of Parliament, trusting to Egypt to get them a majority +at the elections.</p> + +<p>“Then to call on Goschen, whom I found much as two years ago, +that is to say, very intelligent and receptive, though I do not +trust him. We discussed Egypt thoroughly, agreeing on most points, +and I gave him a sketch of a plan of operations. First, we must +make peace with the Mahdi—we must either make peace or fight, there +was no middle term. It would not be necessary for the English +Government to acknowledge the Mahdi. Secondly, we must accept +Egypt’s debt, or a composition of the debt. If we did not want to +fight France, we had better pay. This done, we could establish what +Government we liked in Egypt, leave it to manage its own affairs, +and withdraw our troops to Alexandria.<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_270">[270]</span> Goschen thought it very likely would end in +our accepting the debt, but I fancy he would like to administer the +country according to Indian methods. I cannot boast, however, of +having got anything very distinct out of him.</p> + +<p>“Dined with Broadley and Marriott, M.P. for Brighton, who is +anxious to take up my case of exclusion from Egypt. I do not like +Marriott, but he may help in the Debate, if we can get one on it. +Broadley declares that Parnell and the Irish brigade will also +support me, and that Parnell wants particularly to see me. I shall +be glad to make his acquaintance, as I believe him to be a man of +very high calibre, and I wholly sympathize with his cause.</p> + +<p>“<em>16th July.</em>—To Blenheim, a lovely day. The Duke very +agreeable. I care for few of the pictures, but the Raphael is about +the finest I have seen. The ‘Charles the First’ Vandyke is also +splendid, and other Vandykes are good—and there are two excellent +Mytens, but of all the pictures the one I should care most to have +is a Reynolds, ‘The Fortune Tellers.’ The Rembrandts are not +Rembrandts, and the Rubens are less than first rate, nor do I care +for the large Reynolds. On the whole the Duke does well to sell his +pictures. The house is very fine, in the style I like best.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st July.</em>—Mohammed Abdu has just arrived from Paris. +His ideas are rather changed since we last saw him. The dominant +feeling now is hatred for England; and in this is merged the hatred +of the Circassians. It is the old story over again. When Europe +presses and threatens, they all join their ranks just as they did +at the time of the Joint Note and the Ultimatum. He has not, +however, abandoned Arabi, though he seems to think him +played<span class="pagenum" id="Page_271">[271]</span> out as a +political personage in Egypt, and this is probably the case.</p> + +<p>“I have arranged with Percy Wyndham and Sir Wilfrid Lawson that +they shall bring on my case of exclusion in connection with the +Vote of Supply in the Diplomatic Estimates. Lawson was much engaged +with his procession to Hyde Park to protest against the Lords, and +again asked me to join it, but I refused. As it happened, however, +I did join it unintentionally, for I happened to be going their +way, and walked with them from Pall Mall to Hyde Park Corner. They +were respectable looking men, most of them, not roughs. The +procession was orderly, not to say dull. I had been at the Carlton, +where I had found Churchill. He promises to take up my case of +exclusion when the estimates come on, and so I have written to +Buckle to explain all the circumstances, and enclosing a letter +about it for the ‘Times.’ Broadley and Marriott came to James +Street very anxious to have all the fat in the fire at once, and +the stoking to do themselves, but I don’t mean to trust my case to +them. At the corner of Hyde Park, when I arrived with the +procession, I found Passmore Edwards,<a id= +"FNanchor_73"></a><a href="#Footnote_73" class="fnanchor">[73]</a> +and we discussed the situation. He thinks the Lords will give in at +once, overwhelmed by the majesty of the people—but I don’t believe +this, and I extremely doubt whether the House of Lords is not as +popular an institution as there is in the country. It is certainly +so with the middle class in the South of England. I have arranged +with Labouchere that I should bring Abdu to see the House of +Commons to-morrow afternoon. He also will support me in the affair +of my exclusion from Egypt.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd July.</em>—The Arab race at Sandown. More<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_272">[272]</span> successful than the Newmarket +one, though Halfa did not win. She ran creditably, and I am glad to +say Hadramaut (a colt of my breeding) beat Asil on the post, and +the Indian horses were all left behind.</p> + +<p>“With Abdu to the House of Commons. We missed Labouchere but +found George Howard, who showed us all over the place. I had made +Abdu dress in his blue jibbeh and white turban, and he created +quite a sensation in the lobby. Chesson came to us directly, and +asked us to a public dinner there was to be given to Indians and +other Orientals next week, and the photographer insisted on taking +the Sheykh’s portrait.<a id="FNanchor_74"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_74" class="fnanchor">[74]</a> He was introduced to +several M.P.s, and we listened to an Irish member, Sexton I think, +declaiming on the wrongs of Ireland. From the terrace by the river +we showed Abdu the police boat cruising around to prevent dynamite +attempts, a sight which edified him, and we pointed out to him Mr. +Bright talking on a bench to Nathaniel Rothschild.</p> + +<p>“Parnell was walking up and down at the far end in solitary +gloom, and I got George Howard to introduce us. He was really +charming, having a sympathetic manner, at least to us, as fellow +rebels; wanted Abdu to come and see him and give him information, +and said: ‘We have one of ourselves now in Egypt, Mr. O’Kelly. But +we are afraid he may be kept away a long time.’ I told him that it +had been Abdu and Jemal-ed-Din who had given O’Kelly the letters +which had enabled him to go to the Mahdi, and he seemed surprised +at my knowing this. Parnell’s manner of gloom and reserve seems +unnatural to him, and every now and then there is<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_273">[273]</span> a twinkle in his eye and a +smile which seemed to show the real man better. I should say he was +a good fellow, and I am sure I could get on well with him. At +parting his manner was <em>empressé</em>, and he made us a little +speech, saying that he had had much honour in making the +acquaintance of the Egyptian patriot and with emphasis much +<em>pleasure</em> in making my own. He promised to write and +propose a day for seeing the Sheykh. In appearance Parnell is tall, +good-looking, pale, and with the least little touch of weakness +about the mouth, such as one often sees in Irishmen, enough to show +that he is more Irish than English, and enough to add a certain +charm to his countenance. Altogether I was much taken with him.</p> + +<p>“<em>23rd July.</em>—Mirza Bakir, a Persian Sufi (living in +exile in London) came to breakfast, and went with Abdu and me after +it to Sir Wilfrid Lawson’s. The visit was not so successful as I +had hoped. Lawson put his questions to Abdu rather too abruptly, +and I think a little frightened him, at any rate he would not speak +quite out, except on the point of its being absolutely necessary +the English troops should be withdrawn as a first step towards +re-establishing peace in Egypt. Much the same conversation took +place afterwards with Labouchere, to whom we next went. Labouchere +tried to convince Abdu that Mr. Gladstone wanted to get the troops +out of Egypt, and that the best way to do it was for the Egyptians +to refuse to pay any taxes as long as they remained there. But Abdu +argued with some point that Mr. Gladstone had been talking about +withdrawing for a long time, but that instead of taking troops +away, he was sending more and filling the country with English +officials. He complained that, were the taxes to be refused, it +would be taken<span class="pagenum" id="Page_274">[274]</span> as +an excuse for annexation. It was impossible to convince him that +this was not so. Neither Lawson nor Labouchere affected Abdu with +any sense of their sincerity. This is because they do not know how +to talk to Orientals; their abruptness appears like hostility.</p> + +<p>“Dinner at home with Abdu and Bakir, who had a long discussion +as to whether it was permitted by the traditions (hawadith) to talk +at meals, a point which they solved <em>ambulando</em>; also as to +whether the Koran was originally a book, or only a compilation of +oral sentences. Abdu holds the latter opinion, and I am quite with +him, but the old Mirza is stiff as to its being a miraculous +<em>book</em>. This is curious considering how very latitudinarian +he is on most points.</p> + +<p>“<em>24th July.</em>—My letter about my exclusion is in the +‘Times,’ with a splendid leading article supporting it, and +demanding an inquiry. I have arranged with Lawson that he should +bring it forward—and he has put down a notice regarding it. Percy +Wyndham will say something if he finds something to say, and +Churchill will push it to an issue. We called on Churchill and had +a much more satisfactory conversation with him than with the others +yesterday. Churchill’s manner was just right, and Abdu came away +highly delighted. ‘That young man,’ he said, ‘has more sense than +the other two’—meaning Lawson and Labouchere—‘and he has a better +heart.’ As I am going to write the whole of this conversation for +the ‘Pall Mall,’ I will not repeat it here. Churchill promised to +speak to Chamberlain about Abdu and try to get him an audience +through him of Gladstone. I am sure that if Abdu were to see +Gladstone it would go far towards a settlement. Went down to the +House at question time and<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_275">[275]</span> arranged things definitely with Lawson +about bringing my case forward. I do not intend anything to be said +about Eddy Hamilton or Knowles, or Gladstone, unless my hand is +forced—but if I am attacked I shall know how to defend myself. My +letter in the ‘Times’ has evidently been a success, and I am sure +the Government, when it decreed my exclusion, thought me too +friendless to be a danger; they cannot have been prepared for the +‘Times’ taking it up.</p> + +<p>“<em>26th July.</em>—The day of our Arab horse sale at Crabbet. +There were quite three hundred people there.</p> + +<p>“<em>27th July.</em>—Dined at Sambourne’s, a party of jocose +literary people connected with ‘Punch’—Burnand, Du Maurier, +Boughton, Black, Boehm, and Reed. Burnand is amusing, but Du +Maurier told a story three times over during the dinner, and I +cannot remember it now, although it was also told once again on +rather different lines by Boughton. During the fourth telling I +went to sleep, much to Sambourne’s distress, who is one of those +excellent hosts whose care and pride it is that their guests should +be amused, but I find it difficult now that I drink no wine to keep +my spirits up long to the level of a convivial occasion. After +dinner Cumberland, the thought reader, and others came, but I went +home to bed, drunk for the want of wine. [I had been a tea-totaller +since 1883.]</p> + +<p>“<em>28th July.</em>—Talking to Abdu, he told me the names of +the three men who, bought by Sultan Pasha, betrayed the army at +Tel-el-Kebir. They were Ali Yusuf, a Turk in command of a division, +the middle division of the three, who had retired and so let +Wolseley in; secondly, Abd-el-Rahman Hasan in command of the +cavalry scouts, an Egyptian, who<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_276">[276]</span> had neglected to give notice of the English +approach; and thirdly, Ragheb Nashid, a Circassian Caimakam, who +held the position in advance. These were the only traitors. Nadim +fled to the Soudan. Ali Fehmy was beaten at Kassasin because Mahmud +Sami failed to keep his rendezvous. In reconstructing a Nationalist +Government, he says Ali Fehmy should be Minister of War, Yakub Sami +Minister of the Interior, and Arabi President of the Chamber, +Abd-el-Aal to command the army. I have engaged Mirza Bakir as +Secretary at £1 a week.</p> + +<p>“Called on Churchill and found him in bed. He will take up my +case with Lawson, and I gave him a copy of my private +correspondence for use if we are pushed to it, but I explained to +him my position towards Downing Street, and that I did not wish to +quarrel with Gladstone. He has already bestirred himself about +Abdu, and will take him to see Hartington to-morrow. Robert Bourke +will also take up my case. Mrs. Howard gives me leave to quote my +letters to her as written to a political friend.</p> + +<p>“<em>29th July.</em>—Took Abdu and Bakir to the Carlton where we +met Churchill, and I handed them over to him, and he took them to +see Hartington. They came back highly delighted. Hartington had +shown them great politeness and intelligence, and Abdu thinks he +has created a good impression.</p> + +<p>“Spent a couple of hours at Hammersmith with Mrs. Morris and her +husband, who is a democratic socialist. We discussed the merits of +his scheme of the universe, but I cannot make it fit in with my +ideas. Still, we agree on many points. He calls Gladstone a +confirmed Tory, too old to change. The Morris’s house has a nice +old-fashioned garden full of flowers, pinks especially. I like +these suburban<span class="pagenum" id="Page_277">[277]</span> +gardens, they have more character than others, and the space is all +made use of. [This was the first time I saw William Morris. I had +made Mrs. Morris’s acquaintance the summer before, 1883, at +Naworth, for she was a friend of Mrs. Howard’s, but, though I had +been once or twice to see her at Hammersmith, I had not before met +him.]</p> + +<p>“<em>1st August.</em>—To a party at Mrs. S.’s, where I found the +ex-Khedive, Ismaïl Pasha. She asked me whether I should like to be +introduced to him, but I would not make any advance in that +direction, though I have no special quarrel now with Ismaïl. He is +a repulsive-looking man, a worthy son of the butcher Ibrahim. +Philip Currie was there, more amiable than the last time we met, +also Malkum Khan. I reminded Malkum of our first meeting in +Grosvenor Place four years ago, when he suggested to me the ideas I +have since worked out. I asked him what he thought of Ismaïl. He +said: ‘He has learned much during his exile, and might carry out +reforms now.’ I said: ‘He is without belief. He could not help us.’ +‘He is without belief,’ he said, ‘but not an unbeliever. He has not +strength of mind enough for that.’ Another old acquaintance there +was Madame de Novikof.</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd August.</em>—Interviewed Abdu for the ‘Pall Mall +Gazette.’<a id="FNanchor_75"></a><a href="#Footnote_75" class= +"fnanchor">[75]</a></p> + +<p>“<em>3rd August, Sunday.</em>—Crabbet. De Winton is here, who +has been in Egypt for the last fifteen years. Among other things he +told me of interest, was that he was present when the twenty +thousand pounds were paid over by Gill to Palmer at Suez, and he +says that Palmer had unlimited credit over and above this sum. +Lionel Moore came in the afternoon. He says he always suspected the +Khedive<span class="pagenum" id="Page_278">[278]</span> must have +had something to do with the Alexandria riots.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th August.</em>—A ‘great day of milling.’ My case came up +in the House of Commons this afternoon. I went with Abdu, and Anne +went with Lady Wentworth. The F.O. had published a Blue Book in the +morning on the case, from which it appears that I am charged by +Sherif Pasha with various things, every one of which I am +fortunately able to deny. The Government in fact had not a word to +say, and as far as the debate went, it was altogether a victory for +us, though it leaves things where they were. The most satisfactory +point is that the Government were afraid to attack me, although +Randolph blurted out the whole story of my conversations with +Knowles and Hamilton. Mr. Gladstone had gone out of the House after +Lawson had finished his opening speech, thinking no doubt that the +thing was over, but when Churchill got up they sent for him back. I +was afraid at first the attack would set his back up, but he took +the thing very good humouredly, spoke of me handsomely, and told +his little story without wincing. Knowles he said had persuaded me +‘in the interests of his review.’ I don’t suppose he feels +equivocation at all, and he had got a paper from Eddy, which he +read out, declaring our conversation had been wholly exclusive of +politics, so I hope no harm has been done for I can’t afford to +quarrel with him yet, and I have written to Eddy to explain that I +did not intend Churchill to mention him or Knowles, <em>unless I +was attacked</em>. Robert Bourke came in well at the end on the +legal aspect of the case, and Sir Henry James’s defence of the +Government was a very lame one. On the whole I think it has +strengthened my position, not only with the public, but with the +Government. The House was decidedly favourable to me in the +debate.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_279">[279]</span>“<em>5th +August.</em>—The collapse of the Conference occupies all minds. It +was announced on Sunday in the ‘Observer,’ and of course we are +delighted. It puts everything back into its old impossible groove, +and I shall continue to hope as long as England remains solely +responsible in Egypt. Egyptian Stocks have all gone up, for they +take the failure of the Conference to mean some sort of +Protectorate and guarantee by England. Button telegraphs that +Northbrook goes to Egypt.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th August.</em>—Broadley writes proposing an accidental +interview with Ismaïl Pasha at Escott’s house, and I shall go to +it, though I feel sure I shall not like Ismaïl, but it is time I +should know him, and Broadley promises <em>monts et merveilles</em> +for the National cause if he ever gets back to Egypt. Abdu went to +see him last week, but they did not talk politics.</p> + +<p>“<em>7th August.</em>—A political breakfast given by Indians at +the Westminster Palace Hotel, Sir Wilfrid Lawson presiding. I had +not expected to make a speech, but made one to the satisfaction of +the Indians and the wrath of the newspapers, ‘St. James’s’ and +‘Globe.’</p> + +<p>“<em>8th August.</em>—The ‘Times’ correspondent at Cairo, +Moberly Bell, telegraphs that I am looked upon there as leader of a +powerful party opposed to the Khedive, etc.</p> + +<p>“In the afternoon by appointment to tea at Escott’s, to meet the +ex-Khedive ‘by accident’ because neither Ismaïl nor I have been +willing to make first advance towards acquaintance. He was there +when I arrived, with his secretary Lavison. The tone of our +interview throughout was polite and even friendly. Disagreeable +subjects were avoided, such as the evils of Turkish and Circassian +rule, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_280">[280]</span> Ismaïl’s +past dealings with the Jews. Ismaïl’s is certainly a repulsive +countenance, and I fail to find in him that charm of conversation I +have always heard him credited with. Nor did he show any special +shrewdness of observation. He uttered the usual platitudes of +progress and civilization, the necessity of considering the +religious prejudices of the people, and the influence which could +be exercised by a good ruler—but in no original way. As to +practical matters, the fellahin, he said, if well governed were +quite able to pay the interest on the Egyptian debt. The Soudan was +a rich country which should be developed by extending the railway +from Wady Halfa to Khartoum. He asked about India and the peasantry +there, and seemed pleased to learn my opinion that they were worse +off than in Egypt. On my side, I explained my views of Mohammedan +regeneration, and especially that of the Arabs. I told him of my +conversation with Nubar [at Paris in 1878], and how he had tried to +persuade me that the English was the only Government which was +likely to befriend them. This amused him. We had been speaking in +French, but now he talked a little Arabic to see what I knew of the +language, and he said: ‘At least you speak it better than Nubar.’ +He himself speaks Arabic with a strong Turkish accent, and he +complimented me on mine. But we soon went back to French, where I +fancy he is more at home. He threw a fly over me twice as if to +begin more special matters, saying that he intended spending next +summer also in London. I did not however respond by any hope that +next summer would see him in Egypt. We spoke a little of Mohammed +Abdu, but Arabi was not mentioned. My impression of Ismaïl +decidedly is, that he is not the saviour of our society. There is +nothing different<span class="pagenum" id="Page_281">[281]</span> +in him from the common run of Europeanized Turks. I am glad, +nevertheless, to have seen the old despot, if only to assure myself +once more that he is not our man.</p> + +<p>“This has been the hottest and driest summer I ever spent at +home. From the 28th of March till now there has not been one really +rainy day, though a few attempts at such. The ground has always +been like iron and the ponds are half empty. But Sussex is at its +best in such weather, and the corn is splendid, most of it already +cut.</p> + +<p>“<em>10th August.</em>—Broadley writes that Ismaïl is enchanted +with me.</p> + +<p>“To Scotland in the evening, and found in the same carriage our +friend Eddy, who is going to Taymouth Castle for grouse shooting. +We talked about the Debate. He said he had met Randolph Churchill +the next day at dinner and seemed quite satisfied with the turn +things had taken. It is evident we need not quarrel.”</p> + +<p>From the 11th to the 16th of August I stayed at Lude House near +Blair Atholl, which had been rented by my country neighbour in +Sussex, Mrs. Montefiore. On the 17th, my birthday of 44, I went on +to Naworth Castle to stay with the Howards, Frank Lascelles among +others being there. I stayed at Naworth till the 23rd, but my +journal contains almost nothing political. The only entries worth +transcribing are:</p> + +<p>“<em>19th August.</em>—A letter has come from Arabi approving +the scheme of Abbas and a protectorate. I shall send this to +Gregory to show to Gladstone, with whom he is invited to stay next +week at Dalmeny.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th August.</em>—It is announced that Sami-Ullah of +Aligarh is to join Lord Northbrook’s staff in Egypt,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_282">[282]</span> recommended for the post by +Sir Auckland Colvin; also that there is talk of Tewfik’s abdication +in favour of Abbas and a protectorate.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st August.</em>—George is away at Newcastle, staying at +Sir William Armstrong’s with the Prince of Wales. The Prince, it +appears, has been frightened by the agitation against the House of +Lords and thinks the Throne, too, is in danger, and he wishes to +dissociate himself from Lord Salisbury’s tactics. For this reason +he went to see the procession to Hyde Park last month and now is +paying a visit to the Radicals of Sheffield and making himself +generally agreeable. He asked to have George Howard and his wife +invited to the Festival, and Morley and Cowan have both made +speeches and joined in the loyalty. It was Lord Shaftesbury who +long ago warned the Prince never to separate himself from the +people. The Newcastle Festival has been a great success. It is +wonderful how these democrats of the north love a king.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd August.</em>—I have written to Gregory, who is to be +at Dalmeny for Gladstone’s campaign in Midlothian, to post him up +to the latest phase of the Egyptian situation. I have told him that +Arabi will have nothing to do with Ismaïl or Tewfik, but could +return to Egypt with Abbas or any one else.</p> + +<p>“<em>24th August, Sunday.</em>—I spent the day at Sir Wilfrid +Lawson’s at Brayton, and on the 25th went on to Lord Stanley at +Alderley. Alderley is the sort of place I like. It reminds me +somewhat of Crabbet, but is altogether larger. The house, though +comfortable, is unworthy of the rest, having been built early in +the present century, when the original house was burnt down. The +best thing is the kitchen garden, which is the quaintest and most +beautiful I ever saw, sloping down on three sides to a +large<span class="pagenum" id="Page_283">[283]</span> square pond +or tank, on the fourth side a high wall overgrown by a great copper +beech. There is also a very fine beech wood overhanging another +pond of, I should say, sixty acres.<a id="FNanchor_76"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_76" class="fnanchor">[76]</a> Many fine trees in the +park, but terribly undermined by rabbits. Stanley and I fished in +the wood and caught two little trout. He is a thoroughly honest +good fellow, and works all he can for the Mohammedans.</p> + +<p>“<em>27th August.</em>—To London, where I saw Button for a few +minutes and heard from him of Wolseley’s appointment to command the +troops in Egypt. They are really going to Khartoum at last, having +persuaded the Grand Old Man that Gordon is in danger.</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd Sept.</em>—We have settled to go to Constantinople on +the 12th or 15th. Button has just got a letter from Wolseley, who +says that he hopes to get everything done at Khartoum without +fighting, perhaps without an expedition—more bloodshed would be +unpopular, and so must be avoided. Dined with Bertram Currie at +Coombe. He has put up a temple in his garden to the Grand Old Man, +containing his bust, in honour of a visit paid to him by the Prime +Minister.</p> + +<p>“<em>8th Sept.</em>—Saw Lady C. She told me about the Prince of +Wales, that although he is pretending to join the Radicals over the +Franchise Bill, he really hates Gladstone worse than poison.</p> + +<p>“<em>9th Sept.</em>—I have engaged young Hope as my private +secretary at £80 a year. He is to do all that Button’s private +secretary does for him, keep my correspondence, newspaper cuttings, +etc., etc., etc. I go to Paris on Saturday.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th Sept.</em>—It is announced that Lord Ripon comes home +from India in December, and is succeeded by Lord Dufferin.”</p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_284">[284]</span><a id= +"c09"></a>CHAPTER IX</h2> + +<p class="sch1">CONSTANTINOPLE IN 1884</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">“<em>13th Sept.</em> 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="nind space-above15"><span class="dcap2">“L</span>EFT +London in low spirits, aggravated by the announcement of Lord +Northbrook having presented a complimentary letter from the Queen +to that miserable Tewfik. I am on my way to Constantinople to try +and urge the Sultan to take a lead in reform. He must do so now, or +he will lose his hold over Islam for ever, but I do not expect to +succeed; all is too rotten there for any solid building.</p> + +<p>“I arrived late at the Hotel St. Romain, and dined as in old +days at Bignon’s with Bitters.<a id="FNanchor_77"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_77" class="fnanchor">[77]</a> Bitters is looking older, +and we are all sinking into the grave, whether we have worked or +whether we have played. Only Henri the fat waiter is unchanged, the +same tremulous mountain of flesh as of yore.</p> + +<p>“<em>14th Sept., Sunday.</em>—After breakfasting with Bitters in +the Rue Mazarine, I went to the races of Longchamps and saw +Archiduc win a race in fine style, galloping like a machine all the +way. A beautiful day, but few people, it being September. The only +soul I knew there to speak to, the Duke of Fernan Nuñez. At the +Embassy there is no one, even Atlee<a id="FNanchor_78"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_78" class="fnanchor">[78]</a> gone to Dieppe, Lyons in +England, and Sheffield and all of them.</p> + +<p>“Abdu and Sanua came to dinner—both despondent about affairs in +Egypt.</p> + +<p>“<em>15th Sept.</em>—To the Wagrams at Gros Bois. I had intended +only to spend the afternoon, but have<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_285">[285]</span> been asked to stay on. This is a most +interesting place. Gros Bois was built and enclosed with a wall by +Francis I’s mother, but the present house, or at least the inside +of it, is of much later date. The decorations are wholly +<em>Empire</em> as befits its owners, and it forms a fine monument +of the Bonapartist episode. I was taken over the gallery and state +rooms and shown the pictures and relics, Napoleon’s bed from St. +Helena and the rest, and driven out afterwards in the great wood +which surrounds the house—a delightful day. All is on a large +scale, but nothing is kept up. The grass grows where it wills, and +there are no flowers in the vases. The servants are ancient, almost +decrepit; in the stables are no fine horses. The little Princess +would change all this if she could, but her father-in-law will not +hear of having a chair altered. He and all the rest of the family +are away, only Prince Alexander and his wife and a little son and +heir a year old; they are in mourning, as his mother died this +summer.</p> + +<p>“<em>16th Sept.</em>—The Prince is the best fellow in the world +and the best sportsman. He inherits his love of sport from his +father, who, he tells me, goes out shooting every day of the year, +hunting the woods with dogs for roe, even during the nesting +season, and so doing endless damage to game. Gros Bois is a place, +however, which can stand a deal of disturbance, and he took me out +for a by-day with two old huntsman keepers and a slow hound. It was +an absolutely lovely morning and as hot as July, and waiting in the +green rides for roe to pass was delightful. I shot two and missed a +third. The second was hunted well by the dogs and crossed a +clearing twice before he came within shot, and I got him at last +with a snap shot across a ride, the dog close behind. We also +killed as many hares, a few<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_286">[286]</span> rabbits, and a pheasant or two. There are +in the wood a number of <em>faisans venérés</em>, the sacred +pheasants of China, which have bred and multiplied since they first +escaped from the <em>faisanderie</em>, when the Prussians were +here. The Prussians occupied the Château and took a good many +things, but on the whole did less damage than might have been +expected, the property being recommended to them by the King of +Bavaria, whose relative the Prince is. Altogether two most +delightful days, and it was like a douche to come back to this +wretched little Hotel St. Romain, with its drunken waiters. Dined +and sat till late at a café on the Boulevard with Abdu and +Jemal-ed-Din.</p> + +<p>“<em>17th Sept.</em>—Anne arrived from England in the early +morning; she tells me Malet has been appointed Ambassador at +Berlin. Malet did all Lord Granville’s dirty work two years ago, +let them suppress his dispatches, ate dirt for them, told stories +for them; and this is his fair reward. Though not a man to command, +he is a good servant, and if they want a docile one at the end of a +telegraph wire, they could not do better than take him. He is not +likely to let his imagination run away with him, or make any +scholar’s mistakes on points of detail. Bismarck no doubt has asked +for him, as a safe man, and because he (Bismarck) was a great +friend of Malet’s parents in old days at Frankfort. The only time I +ever met Bismarck<a id="FNanchor_79"></a><a href="#Footnote_79" +class="fnanchor">[79]</a> was at Lady Malet’s, or rather at old +Lord Brougham’s, where she was staying, in Dover Street some twenty +years ago. Edward Malet was at Frankfort when I first went there in +1860, not actually <em>attaché</em>, but doing his<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_287">[287]</span> father’s work with us in the +chancery, always a good boy but a dull one. We neither liked him +nor disliked him, Schomberg Kerr and I, and I don’t remember that +we ever saw much of him except in the chancery—a mouldy place it +was, smelling of apples.</p> + +<p>“Breakfasted with Bitters, and played tennis in the afternoon +with Leigh, winning three sets out of four. Biboche was there +looking aged, and Sérafin.</p> + +<p>“<em>18th Sept.</em>—To the Embassy, and saw Walsham, the first +secretary, now in charge.<a id="FNanchor_80"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_80" class="fnanchor">[80]</a> There is a telegram from +Gordon at Khartoum which sounds as if he were in great straits and +very wild. He says the Government is responsible for all that has +happened, that he expects two hundred thousand Turkish soldiers, +and wants £300,000; is going to destroy Berber and send Stewart to +relieve the garrisons on the White Nile and Dongola. He wants an +expedition quick.</p> + +<p>“To Vienna by evening train.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th Sept.</em>—Vienna. Called at the Embassy and on Victor +Drummond,<a id="FNanchor_81"></a><a href="#Footnote_81" class= +"fnanchor">[81]</a> whom I had not seen since we were at Athens +together. With him I found Hadji Petros, King George’s +<em>aide-de-camp</em>, son of the original of About’s ‘Hadji +Stavros’ in the ‘Roi des Montagnes.’ How things have marched since +then, and they say people cannot govern themselves.</p> + +<p>“Dined at the Embassy. Sir Augustus Paget very amiable. We +talked about Egypt. He remembers Nubar when Nubar was Abbas Pasha’s +Dragoman, etc. (as already given in my ‘Secret History’). Lady +Paget talked about Mrs. Howard<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_288">[288]</span> and the Stanley family, especially about +Lady Amberley and her son.” This was the present Lord Russell, whom +I had known from a child, and had met a little while before at +Naworth and liked. He had had a strange bringing up of an almost +Spartan kind. I remember finding him once lying in the fender when +I came to call upon his mother, his head almost under the grate. I +asked whether she did not think it dangerous; she answered: ‘It +will be useful to him. If a coal falls out it will teach him not to +lie there again.’ On the other side of me was the Comtesse De la +Torre, an old friend of Gobineau’s, of whom we talked much.”</p> + +<p>I had known Count Gobineau well, having made his acquaintance in +1870 through Lytton. It was during the Prussian war, and Gobineau +was in extremities for money, the Prussians being in occupation of +his country house. He had written to Lytton about some Oriental +manuscripts he was desirous of selling, and Lytton, who was at +Vienna, had written to me asking me to help him. I had done what I +could for him, and had earned much gratitude. After the war I went +to stay with him at Trye and we became close friends. I have some +thirty or forty of his letters, chiefly on literary subjects, and +his own private copy of his celebrated book “Sur l’inégalité des +Races Humaines.” This book was, I think, the first to protest +against the old doctrine of the essential brotherhood of man, and, +as the author of it, Gobineau gained a great posthumous renown in +Germany, and became the founder of a school of thought there called +<em>Das Gobinismus</em>. He was a very agreeable man with much +imagination, a bit of a poet and a bit of an artist, besides being +an excellent talker on all subjects. He had been French Minister in +Persia, and in 1870 was Minister in<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_289">[289]</span> Brazil, and an intimate friend of the +Brazilian Emperor.</p> + +<p>“Dufferin was here only yesterday, and we have therefore just +missed him, which is most provoking.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st Sept.</em>—By night train to Lançut, Count Alfred +Potocki’s country place beyond Crakow, arriving on the 22nd. The +Château is only a couple of miles from the station, a very handsome +building, partly of the last century, partly older. It is very +large, with one of the handsomest suites of rooms I ever saw, the +furniture having been brought from Paris, at the time of the great +Revolution, by the wife of the Potocki of the day. Lançut was +inherited from a Princess Lubomirska, who in turn inherited it from +an ancestor of the fourteenth century. These Potockis are allied +to, but of a different branch from, the Potocki who with Branicki +betrayed Poland to Catherine of Russia. They are very patriotic. +Their family has been distinguished in Poland for many centuries, +and in the long gallery there are portraits, most of them badly +restored, of some dozen of them. Four were Generalissimos or +Hetmans of the Polish army, and one, Stanislas, was killed before +Vienna in the last siege by the Turks, 1683. The present Count is +about sixty, a most distinguished man. Forty years ago he was +<em>attaché</em> in London, and has since been Prime Minister and +Minister of the Interior at Vienna, and for eight years Governor of +Gallicia. The Countess was a Princess Sanguscko from Russian +Poland, where she has large estates. There are two sons, Roman, +whom we met in Egypt three years ago, and Joseph, who bought our +horse Pharaoh, and two daughters; one of them is here, Madame +Tyschkiewicz, a charming person, as they all are.</p> + +<p>“<em>23rd Sept.</em>—This is an old-fashioned place. +The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_290">[290]</span> Countess has +two dwarfs, who follow her about wherever she goes, of the size of +children of six or seven years old, but really of twenty-two and +twenty-five, not misshapen or ugly, children of a Polish peasant on +the estate, the father not being particularly small; the dwarfs’ +two brothers are tall enough to be in the army. It is the fashion +with the nobility to keep these little people; they get three +florins a month, everything found, and presents.</p> + +<p>“Drove in the afternoon to a horse fair, I with Count Roman in a +little carriage with four ponies—three white and a spotted one. It +used to be the Polish fashion to have all spotted horses. From the +high plain one can see the Russian frontier to the north ten miles +away, and to the south the last ripple of the Carpathian Hills. +This is a great country for Jews, Gallicia containing nearly eight +hundred thousand of them. They wear long gowns, with felt hats and +long curls. They are disliked as moneylenders, but have not been +persecuted here as they are in Russia. The rest of the population +is half Polish, half Ruthenian, three millions of each. The +Ruthenians are Slavs; they are Catholic, but use the Greek Ritual +and have married priests. In Russian Poland the Ruthenians have +been compelled to join the Orthodox Church. The Poles are all +Catholic. Roman tells me the estate here is about twenty thousand +hectares—forty thousand acres—none of it let, but cultivated under +intendants. They are suffering from the same thing here as +elsewhere, the low price of wheat. We met and overtook a number of +Jews upon the road, nine and ten in a cart. It is a joke here to +laugh at the Jews for going about so many together, and to count +them with the fingers. This makes them angry, as they think the +last one counted will die. At the fair the horses, for +common<span class="pagenum" id="Page_291">[291]</span> horses, +seemed pretty good, better than you would see anywhere else out of +England. The ponies of the country are like the Asiatic ponies, and +were brought here they say by the Tartars. After this we drove in +the forest, a great fir wood, and got home in the dark.</p> + +<p>“The young men, Tyschkiewicz and Roman, have been talking about +the meeting of the three Emperors; they declare it to have been +directed entirely against the anarchists, and to have no relation +either to Egypt or to England. When the Russian Emperor came +through Warsaw, he received a letter from the Nihilists telling him +he had nothing to fear while in Poland, as Poland had suffered too +much already, and they would not bring more trouble on its people. +Half the Poles in Warsaw were nevertheless arrested as a +precaution. The Empress would not leave the Emperor, but followed +wherever he went. The Emperor had tried to speak Polish, which is a +finable offence at Warsaw.</p> + +<p>“<em>24th Sept.</em>—We went out, Roman and I, to the forest to +try and get a roebuck, but saw none but does. There was a part +fenced off in which are red and fallow deer, all too tame. A stag +followed us about, butting at the carriage. I was asked to shoot +two young fallow deer, but missed them, and not sorry. The forest +is a great fir wood, with a sprinkling of oak and birch on a sandy +soil. We drove the four ponies again in a little carriage like a +sledge of the date of Napoleon the First. Joseph has gone away to +Antonin, their place in Russian Poland, where we are to follow him +to-morrow.</p> + +<p>“<em>25th Sept.</em>—Before going away, went over the house +again. It is really magnificent, with splendid Louis-Seize +furniture, china, and bronzes. A grand vase with brass mounts by +Goutière, a whole service<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_292">[292]</span> of Oriental china on a large scale, a +Sèvres stand valued at a hundred thousand francs, and much else, a +dozen rooms <em>en suite</em>, a theatre, a chapel and a ball-room, +all splendidly furnished. Of pictures some excellent Bouchers, +Dutch pieces in Snyders’ style, and a quantity more,—almost all +good. I liked especially a woman by Vincent, a small picture, but +first rate. The family lives in a corner of the house.</p> + +<p>“To Lemberg with Countess Potocka, four hours by train, a +handsome country town of four thousand inhabitants. The Diet is +sitting, and Roman and his father are members. They have a house +here at which we dined, and went afterwards to the Governor +Zalewski’s reception.</p> + +<p>“<em>26th Sept.</em>—Father Lubienski called, and told me much +about politics. He looks upon the Polish case as hopeless in Russia +till there is a war, but it is probable there may be some slight +change for the better in consequence of the meeting of the +Emperors. The Austrian Government succeeded in conciliating the +Poles, so why not the Russian? Only the Russians are altogether +inferior intellectually and morally to the Poles.</p> + +<p>“Went to see the Museum of Natural History, which is the best of +the sort I ever saw. There are no fewer than twenty eagles, and +every kind of bird natural to Galicia is represented with nest and +young, all well stuffed. The beasts less well, but interesting. The +elk is still found in some of the forests, and the aurochs, or +bison, just beyond the frontier—but the last is almost extinct. +There was a white roe in the collection, shot last year by Count +Arthur Potocki. This young man was at dinner last night. He told me +about the roe, and about the Branicki stud—which he helps its owner +to manage—also of some wonderful trout fishing he had had, +twelve<span class="pagenum" id="Page_293">[293]</span> hundred +killed with the fly in a week, and weighing four hundred pounds. +Afterwards we were driven to the top of a hill where there are +public gardens with a fine view in the direction of Russia.</p> + +<p>“<em>27th Sept.</em>—Started for Antonine, Father Lubienski +seeing us to the station. The fine weather is gone, and we had a +disagreeable journey, first by rail crossing the Russian frontier +to Czerny Ostrov, a small station in Volhynia, an eight hours’ +journey, then by road. We were met by two carriages and four, and +drove fifty versts over fearfully muddy roads to Antonine. The +country here is like Salisbury Plain or the Pampas, great rolling +downs of black earth without a stone or pebble for hundreds of +miles, all under plough, no fences, no trees, except where there +are plantations of oak or birch. These are rare, but Antonine +itself is nearly surrounded by a very handsome oak wood of about +eighty years’ growth—fortunately no firs. The house is not a very +large one and without pretence, a good squire’s residence with +pleasure grounds and gardens of about forty acres. There is a large +pond let to Jews at £200 a year for pike. Round this the village +stands, and there are a dozen respectable houses like bungalows +occupied by the administrators of the estate. This used to be a +principality, and is still of thirty-five thousand acres of land in +hand, but the greater part now belongs to the peasantry, who, +thanks to their enfranchisement by Alexander II, are well off. All +the land they cultivated was by that act given them, the Government +paying the Lord of the Manor a small price for it. Their land taxes +are very low, not more than a tenth of what it is in Galicia. The +peasants are Ruthenians by race, but were forcibly converted a +hundred years ago to the Greek church, and are now to all +intents<span class="pagenum" id="Page_294">[294]</span> and +purposes Russian. Industry thrives under protection, and the estate +sugar mill pays well.</p> + +<p>“<em>28th Sept.</em>—As far as I can make out, all is very well +managed in this part of Russia to the advantage of the Russian +peasants, but the Polish landlords are vexatiously treated. Poles +in Russia are not allowed to buy land, or to make wills, and are +liable to confiscation at the pleasure of the Emperor. They are, in +fact, outlaws, and it is the avowed policy to get rid of them. For +this reason they stick closer to the lands they have, and some of +them are still very rich—the richest being the Branickis, and next +to them the Sangusckos. The Polish nobles were originally granted +their lands when these were uninhabited steppes on the frontier +liable to incursions from the Tartars, and the peasantry were their +feudal retainers, but of a different race, Ruthenian, living under +shelter of their castles. There are still some Catholic villagers, +but these are not Ruthenians; they are the descendants of +impoverished Polish nobles, and are still proud of their rank. The +late Prince Sanguscko, the owner of Antonine, took part in the +Polish rising of 1830, and was exiled for ten years to Siberia and +to serve as a common soldier against the Circassians. He +distinguished himself in the war, and so was restored to his +country. Afterwards he made several journeys in the East, and +brought back horses and mares from Aleppo, Damascus, and Egypt, to +add to his Arab stud already existing at Slavuta since 1803. He +died three years ago, leaving half his lands to his daughter, +Countess Alfred Potocka, and half his stud to her son Joseph, now +our host. The half of the stud was then removed here, and there are +now forty-two brood mares.</p> + +<p>“We went over the stud to-day. First, the stallions,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_295">[295]</span> of which Palatine is about the +handsomest horse imaginable. His fault is that he is rather shallow +in girth, but his head, neck, and carriage are superb, and he has +fine action, a gray with dark mane and tail. Artiste, a bay, +fifteen hands two, with beautiful action and carriage and a fine +head, came next. And after him Cyprian, a chestnut, of far more +substance that either of the other two. They like him, however, +here the best and are very likely right. Lastly, there was Pharaoh, +looking more beautiful than ever, and he gave me a pang of regret. +He is fully appreciated here, and has got some good colts this year +of his own gorgeous dark bay colour. Colour, it appears, is a very +important point here at the sales, gray being at a discount, and +chestnut the favourite. The sales take place in May, but the prices +are small. A lovely team of four gray stallions, fifteen hands, is +now for sale at two hundred pounds, and a team of gray mares, +fourteen two, for a hundred and forty; all young animals and +perfectly broken. Twenty years ago Arabs were much more the +fashion, but now young Austria goes in for English blood.</p> + +<p>“The brood mares are splendid, hardly a bad one among them, and +a dozen of the best are absolutely perfect. You could not find such +a dozen mares together anywhere in Arabia.</p> + +<p>“<em>29th Sept.</em>—There was Mass this morning in a funny +little chapel in the garden. Afterwards we went hunting with slow +hounds and greyhounds, and found two foxes in a marsh, which was +drawn by black and tan hounds of the dachshund sort, but bigger. +Got the old one away, a fine old gray fox, but the greyhounds were +on the wrong side, and we had no run. Then we coursed three hares, +a greyhound I gave Joseph Potocki running well,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_296">[296]</span> but the fastest was a brindled +Circassian dog. The hares had no chance. The country is a great +open plain, but enclosed here and there with banks and ditches.</p> + +<p>“<em>30th Sept.</em>—Another day among the horses and the brood +mares at pasture beside an oak wood, a very beautiful sight. Then +to the sugar mill, which brings in a profit of £250 a day for +nearly three months every year; that is £20,000, consuming 1,400 +acres of beetroot, each acre thus giving about £15, but the land +can only grow it once in seven years; still the profit is enormous, +and they have other mills elsewhere. The director of the stud, and +the late Prince’s secretary, worthy men, dine with us every +evening, observing, however, much etiquette with Count Joseph, +after the manner of courts.</p> + +<p>“<em>1st Oct.</em>—Again out coursing, and drew a cover for a +fox blank, and then had some good runs after hares, getting four. I +had a fall at one of the banks. They are dangerous fences to ride +fast at as the ditches are ten feet wide.</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd Oct.</em>—We went to-day to see the cellars. There is +one bottle of Hungarian wine labelled 1683, and perhaps a thousand +bottles of the last century, as well as mead of the same date, +which the Poles used to get drunk on. To become intoxicating the +honey must have been kept for twenty-five years. There are also +many dozens of brandy a hundred years old or more, and all sorts of +curious liquors and burgundies, and ancient Spanish wines. The 1683 +bottle was reserved to be drunk by the King of Poland.</p> + +<p>“Among the letters which came yesterday was one from Primrose; +it contained a copy of an apology written by Dr. Kerr to Villayet +Ali (the Patna case),<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_297">[297]</span> a rather lame one. But as Primrose says, +‘it is a very unusual thing to get an apology at all from an +Englishman to any native,’ so I suppose we must be content.<a id= +"FNanchor_82"></a><a href="#Footnote_82" class= +"fnanchor">[82]</a></p> + +<p>“<em>3rd Oct.</em>—We were to have gone to-day to the Branickis, +but a telegram came in the night altering our plan. This sends us +straight to Odessa. We started from Szepetovka station, thirty-two +miles off, which we did in four hours twenty minutes; this country +has fine woods of oak and birch, infested with swine, as in ancient +Europe. These are spotted, as are sometimes the cows and as were +the mediaeval horses of Poland. At Szepetovka we found that the +Odessa express went in the morning, so we stayed the night at the +Potocki factory.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th Oct.</em>—To-day we have been travelling by train +across ‘the unwise, unjust, unmerciful Ukraine’ as far as Kasjatin. +Our way lay through fine forests, for the forest country begins +here, and we are close to the great bog of the Dnieper, a marsh as +large as Ireland, and one of the largest in the world.</p> + +<p>“Further on, the country is open, and closely resembles the +‘campo’ of Buenos Ayres.</p> + +<p>“<em>5th Oct.</em>—All night in the train, very dirty and +stuffy. Russian generals with spurs on. Fat women, half undressed, +eating apples. Windows nailed up for the winter.</p> + +<p>“Found letters at Odessa, one from Rajah Emir Hassan which talks +of a Madrasa being opened on my plan at Lucknow. This looks as if +the scheme of a general university had been abandoned. Called on +Consul-General Perry, who hates Russia and Odessa, and every +country but Spain.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th Oct.</em>—To the Odessa Exhibition, and saw the out of +doors fair. Here horses were exhibited,<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_298">[298]</span> Russian trotters—a poor lot, and +<em>soidisant</em> Arabs, a poorer. The best horse was a large +Russian dray stallion—white, short legged, very strong, and with +extraordinary good short limbs.</p> + +<p>“<em>9th Oct.</em>—After a disagreeable passage arrived in the +Bosphorus and anchored off the Asiatic shore in quarantine, near a +pretty village with two mosques, near enough to see the Mueddin in +his tower, and the women who come out in the evening to sit on the +beach. The weather is heavenly and consoles us for much. The +quarantine is an act of reprisal by the Ottoman Government against +Europe. They have been pestered with advice and remonstrance for +the last hundred years about sanitary arrangements, and now they +are turning the tables. This has its excuse. I remember the +fiendlike action of the European Sanitary Board at Alexandria +towards the unfortunate Mecca pilgrims at Wej, and how the fat +Greek Sinadino boasted that they had been kept for I don’t know how +many days without water. Numbers died there, and it was one of the +causes of the revolution of 1882.</p> + +<p>“<em>10th Oct.</em>—I have been reading Madame de Crequy’s +memoirs, a delightful volume, lent me by Madame Coumarof, wife of a +Russian Secretary of Embassy, on her way to her husband’s post, a +clever and well informed woman. She believes in dreams and that she +will be crucified some day at Kief. She has told me a good bit +about the Russian peasantry, which is much what I found in +Volhynia; they are well off, eat meat daily, have good houses, and +are able to live on their own land. It is difficult to get labour +for wages, hence land is cheap, this in great Russia on the +Volga.</p> + +<p>“Hugh Wyndham came off to within speaking distance of our ship. +He brought the news that one<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_299">[299]</span> of Gordon’s two steamers had gone ashore +somewhere near Berber, and the crew with Stewart had been killed by +the Arabs. I made Stewart’s acquaintance at Aleppo in 1881. He was +a good straightforward man, very enthusiastic about his work, but +strangely unsympathetic with the Eastern people he worked amongst. +I gave him letters of introduction to some of our desert friends +near the Euphrates, and he made a flying journey through the Sebaa +and Shammar tribes on a camel, but he distrusted the Bedouins and +disliked them. I put the violent line Gordon has taken against them +down to his account. I expect Gordon will be killed next—I wish it +could be Wolseley or Northbrook; it would disgust people with their +unjust wars.</p> + +<p>“<em>12th Oct.</em>—Among our fellow passengers is an American +named Howe, of the romantic globe trotting sort, who is in +ecstasies at all things, and his fellow traveller, a Swede, Mr. +Claes Lagergren, Chamberlain to the Pope. The latter is the more +interesting, as with a <em>doucereux</em> ecclesiastical manner he +is really well informed and sympathizes with those things in the +world which are right. These two have been travelling together +through Algeria, Spain, Sweden, and Russia, an oddly assorted pair. +Lagergren has been at Damascus and in Egypt. There was also a +Mohammedan on board from Kazan, who comes yearly to Constantinople +to trade. In the third class are some thirty Jew pilgrims going to +Jerusalem, very interesting people, very dirty, very devout. They +read their Bibles all day long, and say their prayers turning to +the east, and clothed in striped chasubles.</p> + +<p>“<em>14th Oct.</em>—Our five days’ quarantine over, we were +landed in the Embassy launch at Therapia, and went to see Hugh, and +dined with him at the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_300">[300]</span> Embassy. Count Corti was there, an ugly +little man but sensible and clever. Anne has had a good deal of +conversation with him. I am more than ever sorry to have missed +Dufferin, who has left the best reputation behind him in the +Embassy, and would probably have been glad to see us. We intend to +stay a few days here at Therapia to make acquaintance with the +Ambassadors, especially Nélidof, whom I knew so well at Athens.</p> + +<p>“<em>15th Oct.</em>—At Madame Petala’s Hotel, where I was in +1860; spent the morning writing, and then by steamer to Buyukdereh +to call on Madame Coumarof, and also on the Russian Ambassador. +Nélidof received me very cordially, reminding me of many instances +of our old life at Athens, which I had forgotten, jokes I had made, +the name of my dog, the paper chases in the olive woods, Lady +Dufferin’s visit, and twenty other things which it gave me a pang +to remember. He told me that Madame Ozerof had died some years ago +at Athens and Ozerof, his former chief, had a post now of Grand +Chamberlain at St. Petersburg, but was old and lived with his +married daughter in the Crimea, and that he had kept up his +intimacy with Haymerlé till the day of his death. Of Haymerlé he +said that his end was caused to a certain extent by chagrin. He was +a great worker and master of detail, and had made himself so +necessary to everybody that at last he had become Prime Minister of +Austria. But, once in power, he was unable to cope with the +situation. He had married a little <em>bourgeoise</em> of +Frankfort, and this had emphasized his own want of birth; and +Viennese society had given him the cold shoulder. He was worried +into his grave. We talked a little about politics, about the +possibility of reforming Mohammedan society, which he naturally +does not believe<span class="pagenum" id="Page_301">[301]</span> +in. He said: ‘What will always prevent any reform is the +Caliphate.’ He then talked of a movement there had been in favour +of the Konieh branch of the Sultan’s family, being under the +impression that these were descended from the Koreysh; but I +explained to him that this was a mistake, and that the Konieh +people represented only an elder phase of the Turkish Sultanate, +the Seljukian, not at all the Caliphate. His ideas, like those of +nearly every one, are quite vague on this point. I was very much +pleased with my visit.</p> + +<p>“Later I met another old friend, Madame de Radowitz, the +Prussian Ambassadress, whom I had known at Berne in 1867. She, too, +reminded me of things which gave me a pang. The third old +acquaintance was Mrs. Goschen. Called with Hugh on Count Corti, who +is most agreeable. He remembers Constantinople in Bulwer’s time, +and how his Excellency got his island from the Sultan, and sold it +afterwards for £20,000 to Ismaïl Pasha. This little transaction was +the ruin of Bulwer’s career. There is an <em>entente cordiale</em> +between Corti and the English Embassy. We are to lunch with him on +Sunday.</p> + +<p>“Later to the French Embassy. Monsieur de Noailles is not unlike +Lord Salisbury on a small scale. His wife is a Pole by birth, and +acquainted with all our Polish friends, has been a beauty, and is +still a <em>femme d’esprit</em>; has a salon; we found her +agreeable and the house agreeable. It is an old Turkish country +house, with a single fine room, comfortable and dignified—a great +contrast to our own Therapia Embassy, which was built by Sir Henry +Elliot, in the Swiss Gothic style one sees at Bombay, an eye-sore +to the Bosphorus.</p> + +<p>“<em>17th Oct.</em>—With the Wyndham children to see the Palace +of Belabeg on the Asiatic shore; a modern<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_302">[302]</span> building in very moderate taste, with a +vast deal of paint and gilding and marqueterie work and sham +marble. It makes one ill to think of the millions it must have +cost, and the meanness of the result. The views, however, from the +windows are splendid, and in the garden there are two fine tigers +and some healthy looking ostriches. We then steamed down the +Bosphorus. Nothing in Stamboul is changed, except that a railway +has been run through the Seraglio gardens, and the bridge of boats +has become an iron one. But at Pera and Galata there are marks of +time, gaps where wooden houses have been burned, and a multiplicity +of tall new stucco houses.</p> + +<p>“At Pera we are at the Hotel Royal. My first care has been to +send Stanley’s two letters of introduction to Achmet Vefyk and +Khair-ed-Din Pashas. They are away in their villas. Next I called +on Hobart Pasha;<a id="FNanchor_83"></a><a href="#Footnote_83" +class="fnanchor">[83]</a> he told us a great deal about the Sultan, +who never goes out now from Yildiz Kiosk, a small palace between +Pera and Hissar, and has not been in Stamboul for years. He says he +likes him, that he is very intelligent and well intentioned, but +the Government is as bad as ever.</p> + +<p>“The Sultan won’t hear of anything like independent +administration in the Provinces, which Hobart thinks with me would +be the best cure for the Empire. He talked a great deal about Halim +Pasha, whose cause in Egypt he has been pleading with Gladstone. +Halim is supported strongly by the Sultan. The Sultan told Hobart +only the other day that if he could do anything towards getting +Halim back to Egypt, he would be rendering him a great service. He +urges me to see him and has promised to let Halim know I am here. +Dufferin, he says, has<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_303">[303]</span> entirely destroyed English influence by the +violent line he has taken against the Sultan, and the strong +language he used about him. He had ended by ceasing to have any +communication at all with the palace, and had not seen the Sultan +for seven months when he was recalled. He escaped from all +business: whenever a message came on any matter he used to slip off +in his yacht and pretend he was too short-sighted to see the boats +they sent out after him. He had a yacht called the ‘Hermione,’ +ingeniously arranged so that he could be quite alone in her, +managing the sails himself by a system of ropes and pulleys, his +own invention. Thus he put off troublesome affairs.</p> + +<p>“Henderson, the Consul at Aleppo, who is here, tells us the +state of the Provinces is much as it always was, or worse, the +Pashas eating up the people. Jamil Pasha at Aleppo has made +£300,000 in the four years he has been there. He is a great +favourite with the Sultan, sending him horses constantly.</p> + +<p>“Just before sunset we rode out on hired ponies to the Okmaidan +and saw the Golden Horn in its glory. There is nothing like it, or +near to it, in the world.</p> + +<p>“<em>18th Oct.</em>—Whittaker, the Editor of the ‘Levant +Herald,’ called. He gave me much the same account of what is going +on here. The Sultan is played upon by the palace intriguers, who +frighten him with stories of plots. He is a timid man. The other +day his horse reared with him in the street, and he will not ride +an Arab horse again. He rides, however, ‘pretty well for a Sultan,’ +on trained horses, and shoots at a mark in the old Turkish fashion. +Khair-ed-Din he calls a wind-bag, and Vefyk a man of crotchets. Of +Saïd Pasha, the Vizier, he said: ‘He<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_304">[304]</span> is an honest man but quite ignorant of +European affairs; knowing that he is ignorant he tries to make up +by reading, and he is now in a complete muddle. He belongs to the +old Turkish school, blindly hating all that is foreign; he is +personally honest, but has no power, for the Sultan always +interferes.’</p> + +<p>“In the afternoon we rode round Stamboul: it is wonderfully +shrunk and depopulated since I first remember it, many houses +abandoned and the streets empty. The Seraglio point has been turned +into a new semi-European quarter of the most wretched kind, with +roads and tramways and stucco houses everywhere. The Mohammedan +population seems scarcer, turbans have almost disappeared, and it +is difficult to distinguish between Nazarene and Moslem. An +interesting ride, but sad. Hobart called again in the evening, keen +that I should see Halim without delay. Khair-ed-Din’s secretary has +also called, fixing my visit to that Highness for Monday +morning.</p> + +<p>“<em>19th Oct.</em>—By the half-past nine boat to Therapia. +Selim Faris joined us as agreed at Ortakeui (he was afraid of being +seen with me), and we travelled on with him. His information was +interesting. Of the Sultan he gives much the same account as the +rest, that is to say he speaks of him as a good man, sincerely +anxious to further the prosperity of Islam, and immensely jealous +of his position as Emir el Mumenin and Khalifa, but quite ignorant +of the means through which to act, a prey to charlatans and +intriguers of every kind, except the European kind. Faris has +friends at the palace, and declares that the Sultan shall see me, +although he tells me my name is in bad odour there. The Sultan was +at one time much pleased at my letters in the ‘Times,’ when I +defended the Egyptians before the war, but<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_305">[305]</span> he was angry at my sticking to Arabi after +he himself had abandoned him; and Tewfik’s envoy, Sabit Pasha, is +constantly telling him that I am head of a party in England bent on +restoring the Arabian Caliphate. The Sultan, he assured me, +supported Halim, but there would be danger in making Halim an +English candidate. Arabi is quite out of favour. Faris’s paper, the +‘Jowaib,’ was stopped last year because he had been to see Lord +Granville in London, but he is forgiven now. He thought the Sultan +would take an interest in Indian education, but the whole Turkish +State was dying. The Caliphate would some day return to Arabia. The +Sultan knew it and was doing all in his power to prevent it, but it +must come. He charged me to keep this conversation secret. Lunched +with Count Corti, the Italian Ambassador, agreeable but ugly, with +the ugliness of Socrates, a great Anglomane and friend of +Dufferin’s. He told me he had been at one time favourite Ambassador +with the Sultan, who had given him beautiful horses, but he once +said something favourable about Dufferin in conversation, and from +that time the Sultan would have nothing more to do with him. +Dufferin was not generally liked here, Hugh tells me, and seems to +have been a fiasco politically. On to the French Embassy in Corti’s +steam launch. Everybody here is most amiable to us, I suppose +because strangers are rare.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th Oct.</em>—To call on Khair-ed-Din Pasha at Kurujesme. +He has a handsome house there, being very rich, a man of about +fifty-five, tall, not very agreeable in countenance, and with dyed +hair. He received me well, talked sensibly, explaining his ideas +with considerable clearness, and has the manner of a man used to +State affairs. He had retired, he told me, from these, but the +Party he had represented<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_306">[306]</span> was for progress on Eastern lines, not in +imitation of Europe. He asked me to explain to him the British +policy in Egypt, which I did, and I asked him in turn to explain to +me how it was that with a Sultan, who was admittedly a good man and +well meaning, things only got worse in the Empire. At this he +laughed, and excused himself from answering, he being he said a +Tunisian born, and a stranger. ‘But go to Vefyk Pasha,’ he said. +‘He knows everything, and will tell you.’ He then gave me two +volumes of ‘Controversial Theology,’ which he had had translated +into French, and one for Stanley. And we talked about India, and +the danger there was for the English of a quarrel with Islam. ‘But +they don’t mind,’ he said. ‘They say the Mohammedans in India are +so happy and so fond of them there is no fear.’ We parted the best +of friends.</p> + +<p>“Then on to Achmet Vefyk’s. This is the most remarkable Turk I +have ever met, and one of the most remarkable men. He reminds me a +little of old Ragunath Rao,<a id="FNanchor_84"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_84" class="fnanchor">[84]</a> having the same keen +intelligence, power of vivid expression, and bursts of wit. He is +equally outspoken. Like the old Rajah, he is a man of the past age. +He lives in a little wooden cottage, a kind of hermitage on the +hill, to get to which you have to climb an almost impossible path, +and he affects an extreme simplicity of life. He was out in his +garden when I arrived, and I was shown upstairs to a meanly +furnished ante-room, but sunny and cheerful, where I sat on the +divan till he came in. He came upstairs slowly, like a man bent +with rheumatism, an old man in an old-fashioned dress, a gown and +slippers, with a large square fez of the time of Sultan Mahmoud. He +took me into an inner room a little better furnished, with some +old-fashioned<span class="pagenum" id="Page_307">[307]</span> +painted chairs, covered with Broussa velvet. He talked about the +decay of Turkey. ‘The beginning of our ruin,’ he said, ‘was the +Commercial Treaty of 1832. Before that, our people had trades and +industries. Now there are one hundred and fifty thousand beggars in +Stamboul alone. Look at these chairs, the velvet on them is from a +manufactory that supplied all Europe. Now we buy our velvets, when +we can afford to buy them, from Lyons. They forced tariffs on us, +which gave all the advantage to the foreigner and broke up our +trade corporations, which were the life of the people. This is what +has principally ruined us. Then we have had bad luck. Our Sultans +have been worthless. Formerly we should have deposed them all, till +we got a good one—but Europe interferes with our rights now. You +must not suppose that the deposition of a Sultan is a lawless act. +It is our right. The Sultan Khalifa Emir el Mumenin is not a +religious teacher, he is only the chief of the Moslems, and each of +us is as good as he, and better if he observes the law better. It +is for us to tell the Sultan what he is to do and not to do; and +when I was young there were ten thousand men ready to tell him +this. Now there are only myself and four or five others—old men; +the rest have no courage except to ask for money. You have just +been to Khair-ed-Din. He came here as leader of a party of +reform—he has made himself rich, and he stops here to get a place +or a pension. He will do any dirty work the Sultan may bid him do. +I had refused to do that, and I live in this old tumble-down house. +The Sultan sends for me every now and then to beg me to be his +minister, but I will not be minister unless I have power. When the +Russians were at the gates of Constantinople I was made Vizier, and +sent to treat with them. The Grand<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_308">[308]</span> Duke Nicholas wanted the Sultan to come out +and pay him a visit, that he might see how large his army was. But +the Sultan shut himself up, declaring that they wanted to make him +prisoner, and carry him away to Russia. I refused Nicholas point +blank, and said he must come first to the Sultan, and I succeeded. +The Sultan refused for twenty days, and for twenty days I put the +Grand Duke off, on one pretext or another, and in the end I got the +Sultan to receive him, and to pay him the return visit. The Grand +Duke Nicholas was a man altogether brutal and corrupt.’</p> + +<p>“He then talked about India. ‘The English,’ he said, ‘have lost +their political senses. Formerly I remember many men who had +correct ideas about the East, and he named several, Alison and Lord +Napier. Now they seem deprived of reason. What did they mean by +sending that young man Bulwer to be Viceroy of India? I remember +him here very many years ago, a pretty little young man he was, +fond of saying pretty things to the ladies. A man with such a +talent for writing poetry, how could he make a Viceroy to sit on +the throne of Sultan Akbar?’ I told him about the misfortunes of +the Indian Mohammedans, and how they had charged me to speak to the +Sultan if possible and enlist his sympathy. But he said: ‘I advise +you to be very cautious about this. If the Sultan was a man worthy +of his position, it would be well—but in confidence I tell you, and +do not repeat this even to Lord Stanley—he is mad. His is a +peculiar madness. He is clever and agreeable, and all who see him +go away convinced that he agrees with them, and so he does. For +three days he pays attention to what he has been told. Then he +begins to suspect, and then he sees a new person who tells him the +other thing,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_309">[309]</span> and +all his ideas are changed. He is a man of fixed and violent ideas, +which he changes every week.’ ‘He is not then,’ I asked, ‘the good +man people say he is?’ ‘Do not believe it. The Sultan is <em>un +misérable et un fou</em>. He is out of his mind with fear and +jealousy. Sometimes, when the fit is on him, he will walk round and +round in his palace for four days and nights, never sleeping, +hardly sitting down, hardly eating, and all for fear of +assassination. If you came to him to tell him such a thing as you +propose, he would listen to you and be delighted, then he would +suspect a plot, and be in a fever till you had left Stamboul. +Already he is probably asking himself why you have come, and when +you mean to go. I advise you to be very cautious. People will come +to you from him telling you this and that. He has an army of 4,000 +spies, and you must not stay long in Constantinople. Besides, if +you gave him any such message from India, it is possible he might +take it up and make an intrigue of it, and spoil it as he spoiled +the movement in Egypt. He cares only for intrigue and for being +cleverer than all those he meets, and for outwitting them—intrigue, +and saving money, and fear of what is coming. You had better wait. +It will come in five or six months. The movement in Bulgaria and +East Roumelia will bring on the crisis, and he will be deposed. +Then with the new Sultan something might be done, but with this one +never. Do not forget that he is a madman and do not trust him.’ I +asked him what prince there was who could succeed him. ‘The prince +next in succession,’ he said, ‘is calm and reasonable. It is +possible we may have better luck with him—but our State is ruined +through the men of the present day, who are all corrupt. Look at +the young Turkey Party, what<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_310">[310]</span> fools they are! Which of them cares for +anything but folly, pleasure, and money?—and we are all becoming +paupers.’</p> + +<p>“We talked about Egypt. Vefyk has an old grudge against the +Turks of Mehemet Ali, ‘who were every one of them worthless.’ The +Egyptians he despises; ‘Arabi may have been an honest man, but he +was an ignorant one who did not know what Europe’s power was. A +couple of Turkish regiments would have settled the matter at any +moment. Arabi thought that he could stand alone, without the +support of the Sultan. He was a fool.’ I asked him about Halim. +‘Halim,’ he said, ‘is like them all. He is an intriguer, a man of +no sense.’ Then we went on to talk about Stanley, and it was agreed +that I should come back with Anne and breakfast with him on +Wednesday. In going out he stopped me and said in a mysterious way: +‘I must tell you something which I beg you will not forget. You are +going to see Halim Pasha. He is the best sportsman we have in +Constantinople, he has killed more bears and more wolves than any +other. Remember this, and when he asks you what I said of him, you +will be able to answer with a clear conscience that I told you +something to his credit.’ And the old man burst into a roar of +laughter at his conceit, and so I went away.</p> + +<p>“I met Anne outside, who had come by the steamer, and we went on +to Prince Halim’s, which is close by—a fine house by the water +side. We were received at the door by a man whom I did not +recognize, but who turned out to be Ismaïl Jowdat, who had been +Prefect of Police for the foreigners at Cairo during the war, and +who, having kept order and saved much European life there, was +exiled by Malet after Tel-el-Kebir. At the top of the stairs we +were met by Halim, who in looks is not remarkable,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_311">[311]</span> and who, if he had not said +‘<em>c’est moi</em>,’ I should have taken for a servant. He is +short and fat, but is younger looking and less obese than Ismaïl, +and is more active and alert. His features are rough and without +defined expression, his eyes small and restless, and his manner, +though far from bad, is without grace or special charm. He is in +fact a very plain man, made plainer by his beard being dyed. There +is something frank, however, in his way of talking, and it is +difficult not to see that he is far more respectable than any of +his cousins. He did not ask me about Vefyk, so I was not obliged to +make use of Vefyk’s little stratagem, and we talked at once about +Egypt.</p> + +<p>“‘There is no solution,’ he said, ‘of the Egyptian question +except through the Sultan. Egypt at the present moment is on +strike, and so will remain as long as the Sultan is not invited to +establish a new order of things. If England were to annex the +country outright, she might perhaps manage it, but short of +annexation she cannot get on without help—help from Europe, and +help from Constantinople. The Sultan is the true solver of the +riddle now, as he was in 1878, and whoever undertakes to manage +Egypt must reckon with him. The simplest solution would be for the +European Powers to beg the Sultan to name a new Khedive. Anyone +whom the Sultan named would meet with a good reception. If the +Sultan were to name Ismaïl once more I should bow to his decision, +although I should consider it a great misfortune for Egypt. +Ismaïl’s partisans are the capitalists and speculators of Europe; +all those who want the reign of pillage to begin again. The people +do not wish for them, and would not long endure him. But they would +accept him from the Sultan, and I too. Ismaïl was always false from +a child.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_312">[312]</span> We were at +school together; he never quarrelled, but if a boy insulted him, he +went quietly and stole his exercises out of his desk so as to bring +him into trouble. We are both fifty-four years old, he being two +months younger than me, but he is old from the life he has led. I +have all my life been fond of sport, riding, moving about. This +keeps a man vigorous. It is a mistake to say I do not care to go +back to Egypt; I do care, and I feel sure it is my destiny, but I +do not wish to make a fiasco. They say I might have come forward +before the war. I was twice asked, but not through the intermediary +of any one I could depend upon. Once it was through Monsieur Ninet. +He is very likely a good man, but I ask you, was he a proper person +to represent Egypt in a serious matter? I tried hard to get into +direct relations with Arabi, but never succeeded. I will come +forward if asked to do so by the Egyptians, or if named by the +Sultan.’ I asked him what he thought should be the form of +Government for Egypt. He said: ‘No constitution as yet. Egypt wants +a strong Government just now. She should be ruled by a Liberal +despot, a council if you will, but absolute power in the ruler. +Eastern nations understand this, not the other. As to finance, I +see no difficulty. I do not believe in Egypt’s exhaustion. She +could pay all her debts with economy. Certainly, if the interest on +the debt could be lowered for a few years, she would recover. But +the peasants’ debts must be settled at once. As to the Soudan, my +policy would be that of my father, to hold the whole Nile Valley as +a trade route, as far as the Equator if necessary, but not to leave +the river banks. The Upper Nile is quite necessary to Egypt; it +must be reconquered.’ I understood him to expect this to be done by +Turkish troops.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_313">[313]</span>“On the whole my +impression of Halim is favourable. He is outspoken, practical, and +seems gifted with common sense. I should say he was honest; he has +very little of the prince about him, much more of the +<em>bourgeois</em>. Perhaps this is what Egypt requires. Ismaïl +Jowdat and Mustafa Bey, Arabi’s doctor, who are apparently living +dependent on Halim, accompanied us to the door and thanked me very +warmly for having saved their lives after the war.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st Oct.</em>—Went to see the Yeni-Jami and St. Sophia’s. +In the latter the <em>Asr</em> was going on. Perhaps a hundred +persons present. I wished I could have joined in this, but only +looked on from the gallery.</p> + +<p>“Miss Laing called, who had been Princess Nazli’s governess, and +is now living with Princess Halim. She told us much that was +interesting. She had been very intimate with Arabi, and is very +grateful to him for having protected her during the war. She has no +doubt in the world about the Khedive’s complicity in the Alexandria +riot. It was never intended to go as far as it went, but was +certainly planned. Dufferin extracted a promise from her not to +correspond with Arabi after his exile. Arabi was a quite honest +man, but no administrator, and not quite <em>à la hauteur de la +situation</em>. He would have carried the revolution through, +however, if Egypt alone had been concerned. The fellahin would +certainly support Halim, especially if he came back with Arabi.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd Oct.</em>—Rode to Roumeli Hissar again, and +breakfasted with Vefyk. He gave us eleven Turkish dishes, a very +good repast, and entertained us with much historical disquisition. +The word Arab and Europe he told us are identical, and signify the +Unknown Land. The first Arabs, the Himyarites,<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_314">[314]</span> were Hamites, and are the same people +with the Abyssinians. Queen Belkis was an Himyarite, but they were +later invaded from Chaldea by a Semitic race under Adnan. The +Himyarites are the same with the Phoenicians, as their names +denote, both meaning red.<a id="FNanchor_85"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_85" class="fnanchor">[85]</a> Perseus and Andromeda were +the Persians and the Medes, and he, Vefyk, had been shocked to find +Grote, in his ‘History of Greece,’ repeating the old fables. He +assured us that history, as he was explaining it to us, had always +been taught in the Oriental schools. Abraham was a new man, and +only got his nobility by marrying a daughter of the Himyarite king. +From that he went on to the modern history of his own doings on the +Euphrates, how he had divided the tribes, and built forts on the +river and starved out the Anazeh. On Midhat he was very severe as a +make-believe reformer. He himself, on the contrary, had done real +good; he had rebuilt the ruins of Nissa and the Baths of Broussa, +and had made roads as short cuts from village to village across the +hills. Midhat only made plans, and was in the hands of adventurers. +He also gave us a history of his doings with Nejd and the Ibn +Rashids and the Montefiks—and repeated what he had told me before +about the Sultan.</p> + +<p>“After breakfast we went on to Halim’s, and made acquaintance +with his wife and son. The Princess is certainly a superior person, +and took part in our conversation. The son is very like +himself;<span class="pagenum" id="Page_315">[315]</span> they are +at their best on the subject of Bedouin life, horses, and sport. He +told us about the eighty-four mile race between his horse and the +English mare in 1864. His horse was a bay Hadban from the Anazeh, +but bought by a dealer. The English mare’s name was Alabama, which +seems to have belonged to several owners, of whom the principal was +Mr. Smart. After about sixty miles, Alabama stopped, and Hadban +came in gaily. An objection was raised on the score of the jockey +having lost five pounds in weight, but eventually the money was +paid. The race was run from Suez to Cairo in seven hours fifty +minutes. This is not very different from the account given me by +Hetherington, who trained Alabama, except that according to him +Alabama was some way ahead of Hadban when she stopped, and nearer +home. Hetherington said that he had ridden out to meet the horses +coming in, and stopped the mare to give her some gruel, after which +she could not move, but it is evident he would not have stopped her +if she had not been pretty nearly done. Halim assured us that he +had ridden one of his Arab horses once, at trot and canter, for +twenty-four hours, another for eighteen hours.</p> + +<p>“Coming in after dark, Count Corti came. He has a poor opinion +of Vefyk, whom he calls mad. Of Halim, however, his opinion is +high, and he had reported it so to his Government when they had +enquired about him. But the Italian Government was all for Ismaïl.” +The reason of the patronage given by the Italian Government to the +ex-Khedive was, that at the time when Ismaïl could command money in +plenty, he had lent a large sum to the King of Italy.</p> + +<p>“We have a fancy for taking a house at Bebek, just under Roumeli +Hissar.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_316">[316]</span>“<em>23rd +Oct.</em>—Went across the water to Kadikeui to see the Polish +patriot Langiewitz and his horses, for he has a small Arab stud. He +was at the head of the revolt of 1863, an unfortunate affair, which +was not fully joined in by the nobles, and was disapproved by the +Potockis and others. He is a very little man, with big beard and +spectacles, more like a Professor than a General, with an English +wife—worthy people, very. He has got a nice old-fashioned Turkish +house, with large grounds, for which he pays a rent of £160, and +one might do worse than end one’s days in such a retirement. He +talked sympathetically of Arabi and the Egyptian war. About +Constantinople, he told us that a census of the population had +recently been taken, which showed the Mohammedans already in a +minority there. Here at Scutari and Kadikeui the decaying number +was equally noticeable. His wife had been thirty years in the +country, he nearly twenty. The state of things was wholly hopeless +for the Turks.</p> + +<p>“On coming in I found the Russian Ambassador, with whom I +discussed the same point, but he would not admit the population to +be diminishing, though he agreed that all lands habitable by +Europeans would sooner or later be possessed by them. He talked of +the progress made by the Germans in Asia Minor. We were talking +about the Egyptian Revolution, as to which he was anxious to hear +the truth, when we were interrupted.</p> + +<p>“Whittaker, who came in next, told some amusing stories of the +Sultan and his dealings with the Ambassadors. To avoid talking +business with them, he arranges to have inconvenient people +present, or to be interrupted, and when hard pressed a band of +music strikes up. None of the Ambassadors are on confidential terms +with the Sultan. The last who<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_317">[317]</span> was so was Layard, and he had disgusted the +Sultan with all foreign intimacy. Layard, when he was Ambassador +here, had his breakfast table supplied daily by the Sultan—butter, +milk, bread, and the rest—and dined with him constantly; and there +was a constant flow of presents, sometimes of value. This while +Disraeli was in power; but when Gladstone came into office, Layard, +who had hitherto supported the Sultan at the Foreign Office, had, +in the hope of keeping his place, written the dispatch against him +which Granville so treacherously published. Since which the Sultan +has trusted nobody. He treats his own ministers as slaves, and, +when one of his Viziers wrote on some occasion resigning his +office, all the answer he got was, ‘When I want you to leave me, +you dog, I will let you know.’</p> + +<p>“<em>24th Oct.</em>—Selim Faris called with great talk about my +being received at the palace, and advising me to write to Munir +Pasha asking an audience. I asked Faris to tell me frankly all his +opinion of the Sultan’s character and of the chance of my interview +having some good effect, and I think he was sincere in what he told +me. He said: ‘The Sultan is a man who has really good intentions +and who really wishes to serve the interests of the Mohammedans and +of religion generally, and especially of the Caliphate. But he is +quite ignorant of the world, and, to tell the whole truth, he is +crazy. He cannot keep to any plan or line of conduct, and he is +ruining the Mohammedans and religion, and his own Caliphate. The +question of the Caliphate is one which is coming on now very +rapidly. The English Government, from its connection with India, +must eventually become its protector, whether it intends it or not, +and will guard the shores of the Red Sea, for the Caliphate must +return to Arabia. I should<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_318">[318]</span> advise you nevertheless to see the Sultan +if possible. You might gain an influence over him, though there is +nothing certain in his conduct, and things cannot be worse than +they are now. There is a foundation of good in his character on +which to work, and you need not believe the stories of his caring +only for money. He cares rather to spend it. Send in your letter to +Munir, and when the audience is agreed to we will talk over what +you should say to the Sultan, or rather what you should not say.’ +This decides me to stay on another week here in the chance of +succeeding. He also talked about Dufferin and the work Mackenzie +Wallace had done for him here, and how he had written most of his +Egyptian report for him. Wallace has now gone as Dufferin’s regular +secretary to India at £3,000 a year.</p> + +<p>“At noon we went to the Selamlik to see the Sultan go to mosque, +just outside his palace walls. It was a very simple affair, a +couple of companies of rather ill-groomed soldiers, a few men on +seedy horses, half a dozen dust carts filled with sand to sprinkle +the road, two carriages full of ladies who did not enter the +mosque, about fifty officials in uniform, including Tahir Pasha, a +Grand Chamberlain, and Hafiz Behram-Agha, the Sultan’s chief +Eunuch. This last is a grave, respectable-looking person in black +clothes, with considerable dignity of manner. He stood on the +doorstep outside during prayer with the rest of the courtiers. Last +of all the Sultan drove up in a victoria with the hood up, two +white horses of nondescript breed, two elderly officials on the +back seat, and a driver in a handsome Eastern dress. The Sultan got +out immediately the carriage stopped, turned an instant to salute +the people, and disappeared inside the mosque door. He is small and +slight, but being well shaped looks taller than<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_319">[319]</span> he is. His face is handsome, +very black eyes, beard, and eyebrows, a nose of prodigious length +and a calm passionless expression—a dignified apparition. But I saw +it all from a considerable distance, and only for two seconds each +time, going in and coming out. As he drove away there was a +melancholy attempt at cheering, the hood was put down, and the Emir +el Mumenin was rapidly driven away from men’s sight. We occupied a +little pagoda opposite the mosque, with a couple of score of +sight-seers and officials. Next me were Ismaïl Jowdat and Husseyn +Pasha, one of the Sultan’s aides-de-camp.</p> + +<p>“Afterwards Ismaïl Jowdat came to the hotel, and spent three +hours giving me an account of the events of 1882 in Egypt.” These +are embodied in my “Secret History” and need not be repeated.<a id= +"FNanchor_86"></a><a href="#Footnote_86" class= +"fnanchor">[86]</a></p> + +<p>“<em>25th Oct.</em>—Rode to the Okmaidan and found the Jews +keeping Sabbath in their best clothes. Some of them were catching +goldfinches in a net, and we had the satisfaction of letting a bird +go. These Jews talk Spanish; one of them told me that their +families had come four hundred years ago from Spain.</p> + +<p>“<em>26th Oct.</em>—Count Corti came to take us in a steam +launch to Therapia. We had luncheon with the Wyndhams and called on +the Noailles. The arrangements of the French Embassy at +Constantinople depend neither on the Sultan nor on the Ambassador, +but on the fancy of his son, a youth of fifteen. Monsieur Doudou, +as he is called, makes the rain and fine weather on the Bosphorus, +goes out sailing in a boat by himself to the terror of his parents, +who have him accompanied by another boat to pick him up. When he +goes out riding two negroes run beside him for the same purpose, +and when he goes out walking, he is surrounded by an +Oriental<span class="pagenum" id="Page_320">[320]</span> retinue. +If Monsieur Doudou stays out late there is no dinner at the +Embassy, and the Ambassador cannot return to Pera until his son +consents. They are very anxious just now to gain his consent to +this necessary autumnal move, but Monsieur Doudou is out of humour, +having styes in his eyes, and will not be cajoled. A few nights +ago, his parents being out dining, he gave a ball at the Embassy to +the housemaids, and ended by smashing all the bells. When the +Ambassador returned, he enquired the meaning of the rumpus, and was +told that it was his son; ‘Rien, que cela!’ said M. de Noailles, +and went off pleased to his bed.</p> + +<p>“On our way back to Constantinople Count Corti entertained us +with stories of the Berlin Congress, and of Lord Salisbury’s antics +there. Disraeli and Salisbury had gone there quite on their high +horse to curb the territorial ambition of Russia, and the +publication of the secret convention for the acquisition of Cyprus +was a great shock to everybody. Salisbury broke it gently to +Waddington before the news was published; and Waddington consulted +his colleagues, it being generally agreed that there was no middle +course between going to war and saying nothing. ‘<em>Il faut la +guerre ou se taire</em>.’ But the publication was a great blow to +Disraeli, who took to his bed, and did not appear for four or five +days. Lord Salisbury, however, brazened it out and came to the +Congress with an air of defiance. There was no rupture between him +and Waddington, and they remained on apparently friendly terms—but +Waddington had his revenge. He was sitting one day with Salisbury, +and, the conversation leading that way, Waddington asked what the +English Government would say to France taking Tunis, and Salisbury +said he did not see the harm. Whereupon<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_321">[321]</span> Waddington communicated this to Paris, and +on his return the French Ambassador in London was instructed to +write to Lord Salisbury reminding him of his words. Thus Salisbury +was caught; ‘But,’ said Corti, ‘if he had known anything of his +business, he would have declined to answer the note officially and +would have pleaded a private conversation.’ He did not believe that +any arrangement of condominion was come to between Salisbury and +Waddington at that time, though I told him, without mentioning +names, of the letter Lytton had shown me.<a id= +"FNanchor_87"></a><a href="#Footnote_87" class="fnanchor">[87]</a> +Count Corti is interesting diplomatically, as he has been to more +Congresses than any man in Europe. He said it was a pity the Sultan +kept up his feud with the English Government, but seemed inclined +to agree with me that our Government would have to come to terms +with him about Egypt. He spoke very strongly in favour of Halim, +and of the Sultan’s wish to make him Viceroy in Tewfik’s place. If +it is true that Dufferin holds this view, our chances look brighter +than I have imagined. There is a talk of Evelyn Baring as +Ambassador here, a not unlikely thing considering what a failure +his policy in Egypt has been. He, like Malet, has served the +Government by holding his tongue, and letting his dispatches be +mutilated and suppressed. So he will be rewarded.</p> + +<p>“<em>27th Oct.</em>—Selim Faris called to ask whether I had +received any answer from the Sultan, but none has come. He said it +was quite necessary the English Government should come to terms +with the Mohammedans for both their sakes. This must eventually +happen, as England would be obliged, whether she liked it or not, +to make herself their protector. With regard to the Sultan he might +be<span class="pagenum" id="Page_322">[322]</span> pacified by +being allowed to appoint a new Viceroy in Egypt, but it would be +most dangerous to allow him to administer the country. What he +cared about most was to give the world some striking proof of his +power. He would jump at the idea. At the same time Faris is +convinced that he will never really forgive England, but will take +his revenge whenever the opportunity offers. I asked him if the +Sultan was on good terms with any of the foreign Ambassadors, and +he said: ‘Yes, with the German—and quite lately with the Russian.’ +There seems to be an alliance for the moment with Russia against +England.</p> + +<p>“Whittaker came in next, and I asked him the reason of +Dufferin’s ill success here. He explained that he had begun badly. +The Sultan was wanting in politeness to him, and he resented it, +and Lady Dufferin was shown no attention. During the whole of her +stay at Constantinople she was only once asked to the palace, and +then the Sultan did not see her. But it was almost impossible to +deal with Abdul Hamid. In the negotiation about Egypt he had +changed his mind constantly, telegraphing orders and counter orders +to Musurus after he had agreed with Dufferin. This made Dufferin +say he lied. Then Dufferin with all his outside amiability was a +very hard man. Whittaker says he might be cruel if occasion +offered, and the transitions between the velvet and the iron were +too abrupt. The Turks did not like this. For the last eight months +he was neither invited to, nor went near, the Palace. Goschen was +much more successful, though he, too, gave offence by going to the +Palace in a shooting jacket; but Whittaker thinks that if he had +stayed longer he would have been liked on account of his frank +manner.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_323">[323]</span>“Henderson also +called. He said we had been very near war over the Dulcigno +business. Goschen had given him orders at one time to pack and be +ready to leave the Aleppo Consulate. Next Ismaïl Jowdat. I read him +over the account of what he had told me on Friday about the events +of 1881 and he corrected it on many points (see <a href= +"#Page_555">Appendix</a>).</p> + +<p>“<em>28th Oct.</em>—Mustafa Bey, Arabi’s doctor, breakfasted +with us. He is the most satisfactory man of all I have yet met, +and, having been with Arabi throughout the war, he is excellent +evidence. Arabi’s character, he said, was quite distinct from that +of all those who surrounded him. He was the only one of those in +high command who had real patriotism or real religion, who did not +seek his personal interest, and who saw things clearly. His fault +was that he was too confiding, too humane, and too little +censorious of others. He, Mustafa, was with Arabi at Tel-el-Kebir +to the last moment. No attack was expected, as Ali Yusuf, who +commanded the <em>avant-garde</em>, had been bought by Sultan +Pasha, and Saoud el Tehawi, who managed the scouting business, was +also in the pay of both sides. Arabi was asleep still in his tent +when they heard a sound of shots (not cannon he says) and presently +soldiers running away accompanied by Bedouins. Arabi drew his sword +and tried to rally them, begging them to fight for their country +and their religion, but they shouted to him ‘<em>Ya ibn el +kelb</em>’—‘Why should we have ourselves killed for you?’ The +Bedouins, too, fired at him. It was the doctor who got Arabi to +mount and ride off. He himself, after having got into a train which +was stopped by the English, made his way to Zagazig on foot. He +says I am quite correct in my estimate of the characters of the six +exiles in Ceylon. Mahmud Fehmy and Abd-el-Aal are honest men. +Mahmud<span class="pagenum" id="Page_324">[324]</span> Sami and +Yakub Sami joined the movement from personal motives of spite +against the Khedive; and Toulba was never anything but a worthless +<em>gamin</em>. Arabi was wrong to trust them, but he had few good +men to choose from, and when men swore oaths to him he trusted +them. Thus he trusted the Khedive. Ali Fehmy was only half-hearted. +He was certainly acting in concert with the Khedive in the affair +of Abdin, but Arabi was not in their confidence. The thing had been +arranged as long before as July, and Sherif was in the plot. Riaz +wanted to make himself regent, just as Sultan Pasha afterwards +expected to be made regent when Tewfik was to abdicate after +Arabi’s trial. Sultan, at least, had told his friends this, showing +them the Order of Michael and George he had received, ‘The same as +had been given to the Sultan of Zanzibar.’</p> + +<p>“He then gave us the whole history of the Tantah massacre in +detail, which he knew first from the official enquiry made before +Arabi when it happened, and at which he assisted, and secondly from +Ahmed Minshawi with whom he had lived afterwards at Beyrout, and +who came here with him, and who had repeatedly told him the story. +The true facts were these:</p> + +<p>“The Mudir of Tantah, Ibrahim Adhem, with Osman Rafaat, excited +the populace against the Christians, as Ismaïl Jowdat related, +telling them that Arabi had ordered it; and the Mudir shut himself +up also as related. Minshawi lived at a village called Koreyshiyeh, +and happening to come in that day by train with Abd-el-Aal Pasha’s +son, Emir Bey, and Husseyn Wasif, a magistrate, they found +Christians being killed, and Minshawi interfered. They, the +populace, called out to him that Arabi had ordered it, but Minshawi +had said to the effect of ‘Damn<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_325">[325]</span> Arabi,’ and insisted on their stopping. He +had then gone with Abu Diab, who had also been trying to stop the +massacre, to the Mudirieh, and had kicked in the door of his room +and expostulated with him for letting the thing go on—Abu Diab +using strong language, for he was very angry. Then they telegraphed +to Arabi at Kafr Dawar to send soldiers to stop the massacre, but +the telegram had to go round by Ramleh, and was delayed. But at +last the massacre was stopped. The whole thing was enquired into at +Kafr Dawar immediately, and the Mudir was sent to Cairo and there +imprisoned till the end of the war, Darwish Pasha replacing him. +After the war Adhem was reinstated, and when the commission was +sent to Tantah, Ismaïl Yusri, the President, who was a +comparatively honest man, ascertained the truth and informed the +Khedive that he should be obliged to find him, Adhem, guilty, and +so begged to be replaced by another on the Commission. This was +done, and an officer less scrupulous was appointed who accepted the +false evidence Ibrahim Adhem was allowed to trump up against Abu +Diab. Ibrahim Adhem, however, was deposed, and Husseyn Wasif (a +Circassian, not the same as the magistrate) was appointed. He it +was who was made a scape-goat of for Ibrahim Adhem’s sake, and was +deprived by Clifford Lloyd and sent to the Soudan. Mehariz Bey, +formerly sub-Mudir, is now Mudir of Boheyra. Minshawi is the +son-in-law of Abdallah Pasha, the English renegade, and his son +Emir still goes by the name of the Englishman.</p> + +<p>“Mustafa Bey confirms all Ismaïl’s statements of the Khedive’s +connection with the Alexandrian massacres. He was at Alexandria at +the time, and was the doctor employed to examine the bodies. There +were fifty-one Christian bodies, twenty-three<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_326">[326]</span> Mohammedan, of which eight were +<em>mustafezzin</em>, all the latter killed by pistol shots. The +English doctor wanted to make out the Christian bodies had wounds +made by <em>des armes blanches</em>, but this was not the case. +Omar Lutfi certainly gave orders to the mustafezzin to come +unarmed. I like the worthy doctor much. In face and figure he is +not unlike Lord Lyons.</p> + +<p>“We rode in Stamboul past the bazaars and the tower and the +horse market, and dined with Whittaker. Sat next to Mr. Laing, +Director of the <em>regie</em>, who seems a sensible man, and had a +talk with a certain Mohammed Bey, more or less of a spy I believe +of the palace. I told him a good deal of what I intend him to +repeat there. Sinadino has gone bankrupt at Cairo, so there is +still justice in the world!</p> + +<p>“<em>29th Oct.</em>—The Egyptian Princes, Osman and Kiamyl, came +to see us. I never thought to like them so well, but they talked +patriotically about the late war, and were really improved by the +part they played. [Here follows the conversation I have recorded +with Prince Kiamyl in my ‘Secret History.’] About Arabi’s trial +Kiamyl said: ‘If you had only gone on, Tewfik would have been +broken. He was in a terrible fright, knowing that his crimes would +have been laid bare. It is a pity you allowed the compromise.’ The +Sultan, the Princes told us, was mad with fear; the disease had +begun fifteen years ago when a little girl he had was burned to +death. The least mention in praise of any man was sufficient to +arouse his suspicion. He had never received them except in public +audience. To ask for a private audience was enough to ensure his +displeasure. With them was Aarif Bey, who had been the Princes’ +tutor, the same who came with them two years ago to Crabbet. He is +a Kurd of Arab origin<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_327">[327]</span> and a man of very superior education.<a id= +"FNanchor_88"></a><a href="#Footnote_88" class="fnanchor">[88]</a> +We have decided to go by French boat to Marseilles on Wednesday, as +there is small chance of my getting an audience with the +Sultan.</p> + +<p>“<em>30th Oct.</em>—With Count Corti to the Bazaars. Selim Faris +came at five. He gave an amusing account of the Sultan’s manœuvres +to set every one by the ears, which is his system, according to the +<em>divide et impera</em> rule. ‘You see the palace,’ he said. ‘The +Sultan sits here with a plan before him, showing the rooms occupied +by each of his household. If he finds two together making friends, +he puts them far off each other. His whole object is to put next +each other those who hate each other most. His chief chamberlain +and his second chamberlain would poison each other if they could; +they are lodged together in this corner. There is Ghazi Osman with +Deli Nuzret whom he hates, and there again Abdallah Ibn Saoud and +Sheykh Ahmed Assad, both Arabs and bitter enemies. Thus the Sultan +comes to know everything, and there cannot be any plot against him +he thinks. It was just the same in Egypt; when he sent Dervish +Pasha, he also sent Sheykh Ahmed Assad, his greatest enemy, to +watch, and, after them, Kadri Bey, his secretary, to watch them +both, and even that was not enough, for they had not been there a +fortnight when he sent a fourth, Ahmed Bey, one of his +aides-de-camp. Kadri wrote to the Sultan complaining that this last +was laughing at him, and insulting him publicly, but the Sultan +rewarded the aide-de-camp, and Kadri has been in disgrace ever +since. The Sultan has never seen him since his return to +Constantinople. The<span class="pagenum" id="Page_328">[328]</span> +others told him he was bribed, but Kadri took nothing but a few +jewels. Dervish took money. He got £40,000 in <em>consolidés</em> +from Tewfik, besides jewels and articles of value, but he was +clever enough to send presents by every post to the various members +of the household. Kadri didn’t. I know everything that goes on in +the palace through Zaffir Bey, the Sultan’s private secretary, the +same who wrote to Arabi. He and his father have been friends with +my father for forty years, and I have one other friend in the +palace. It does not do to have more, and even these I am obliged to +pretend not to know. I shall go to-morrow at six o’clock, before it +is light, to find out about your letter to Munir Pasha. I will let +you know at breakfast time. I should like you to see the Sultan for +the sake of your friends in Ceylon and India. But the Sultan cannot +help you, he is so busy and has no memory. He writes down +everything that is told him in a diary, but he has no memory. He +has always been very kind to me, but I have been in a mess with him +several times. First because I would not write against Ismaïl when +they were going to depose him, and for other things. But I am +protected by Zaffir Bey, and he always intercedes till the Sultan +forgives me and makes me presents. I have three jewelled boxes from +him, and when I went to England last year he gave me £300; but I +got into disgrace by dining with Lord Granville, and my newspaper +was suspended. Now I am in favour again, and the <em>Jowaib</em> is +to go on next month as before, I am very fond of the Sultan. He is +so kind, but he is a child. He does not understand, though he wants +to know everything. He has spies in every house, either the cook or +a slave. When he wants particularly to know about any of the +Pashas, he makes them a present of one of his women, and +then<span class="pagenum" id="Page_329">[329]</span> he hears +everything. I was offered one once, but I would not have her. The +Sultan has not so many women as some of the Sultans have +had—perhaps twenty-five or thirty at a time, but there are several +hundred more in the palace, servants and slaves of these. Abdul +Hamid has never been married legally. I knew him long before he +came to the throne. I never heard the story about his daughter +being burnt, but it was Abdul Aziz’s death and Murad’s dethronement +that have driven him mad.’</p> + +<p>“Faris has promised to help me with all details in my History of +the Egyptian Invasion. He tells me he can tell me everything that +went on between the Sultan and Egypt, but I think I know all pretty +well as it is. Faris also gave a curious account of the +dethronement of Ismaïl in 1879. Ismaïl had written to Abdul Hamid +to say that he was threatened with dethronement by the Powers, and +to ask whether he should abdicate. But the Sultan would not hear of +this, and sent him word that he was never to give in and that he +would support him. At the same time he called a council to discuss +the matter, and hid himself in the council room behind a curtain. +Khair-ed-Din was Vizier, and spoke strongly in favour of yielding +to the Powers, saying that if they did not the Powers would act +without them, and the prestige of the Sultan would be lost. Abdul +Hamid, hearing this, changed his mind, and the Ministers were sent +at once to the telegraph office, and there wrote out the order +deposing Ismaïl. This tallies closely with what Lascelles told me +of Ismaïl’s surprise at the order. Faris was in the palace and +heard everything as it happened. ‘And I could have cried my eyes +out,’ he said, ‘with vexation, for Ismaïl was then my patron.’</p> + +<p>“<em>31st Oct.</em>—Stayed indoors. Our first visitor +was<span class="pagenum" id="Page_330">[330]</span> Aarif Bey, and +he and Ismaïl Jowdat, who came later, stayed to luncheon. Aarif is +more interesting than I at all suspected in spite of his +distinguished appearance and pretensions to Arab descent. He told +me his history and that of his family. They are a family of Seyyids +settled 700 years ago in Kurdistan, where, until sixty-five years +ago, they were hereditary rulers, their capital being Mardin. But +the centralization of the Empire destroyed them, and his +grandfather was brought away to live at Constantinople by Sultan +Mahmud. It is clear, however, that they have preserved their +descent pure, and he spoke in scorn of the mongrel Turks of modern +times. After lamenting the dangers and misfortunes of Islam he +communicated to me the secret that all was arranged for a Kurdish +rising next May, and that he was going to put himself at the head +of it. They would be able to put 80,000 men under arms,—this +without the help of Russia, which had offered them arms, but whose +alliance they refused. They did not wish to quarrel with the +Sultan, but to stand to their arms and demand the right of local +self-government. Their country was abominably misruled by ignorant +and corrupt Stamboulis, and they felt that if they did nothing they +would one day be engulfed in the common ruin of the Empire. Every +year they were becoming poorer and weaker, but the Kurds were a +nation still of three millions, and warlike men. He asked me +whether I thought the English Government would give them its moral +support. He had seen Dilke when in London two years ago, and had +asked him about it, and Dilke had told him that, though the idea +was not discouraged, he considered the time an unfavourable one. +This must have been about a month before the bombardment of +Alexandria, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_331">[331]</span> it +tallies curiously with what Eddy Hamilton wrote to me about the +projected Syrian rising a little more than a year earlier.<a id= +"FNanchor_89"></a><a href="#Footnote_89" class= +"fnanchor">[89]</a></p> + +<p>“I told Aarif in return the history of my correspondence with +Downing Street on just these points, and warned him not to trust to +Mr. Gladstone or to England, which was far too busy in all parts of +the world just now to attend to Kurdistan. Russia, too, would be +sure to prevent anything like Mohammedan Nationalism on her +frontier. The Russian design was to take possession of the +Euphrates and the head of the Persian Gulf. To this he said that +the Kurds were willing to risk a quarrel with Russia, that, if they +waited, their fate would be only more certain afterwards, and that +at present Russia favoured them. And he asked me to plead their +cause in England. I promised him to do this, but told him very +frankly that it would be almost impossible to attract sympathy in +England for the Kurds. A Kurdish question would not be understood +there, and all that was known with us of the Kurds was taken from +the tales of travellers who had been robbed by them. I advised him +therefore strongly to put his case forward as part of the Armenian +question, which was already understood in England, and had +attracted sympathy, and was even provided for in the Treaty of +Berlin. As an Armenian rising, it would be understood, and would +have a kind of legal standing. He told me that the Armenians were +with the Kurds in this matter, but that there was the difficulty as +to who should be their chief, for the Armenians would want a +Christian, while the Kurds would have none but a Mohammedan. Anne +suggested, however, that there might be two chiefs, and we looked +out the position on the map and found<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_332">[332]</span> that in fact the country might be divided +into two districts. The north with Van as capital would be +Christian. The south with Diarbekr would be Mohammedan. He assured +us the Arabs, too, were with them, the Shammar, the Taï, and the +Jibouri—and the rising would begin for certain next May.</p> + +<p>“Aarif’s father is Seyyid Yusuf Sidki. His brother-in-law was +one of the leaders of the last Kurdish revolt with Sheykh +Obeidallah. They would have conquered Persia but for the Sultan’s +intervention.</p> + +<p>“Selim Faris also looked in. He has been to the Palace and finds +that Munir Pasha has not dared mention my name to the Sultan or +forward my letter. They are all afraid.</p> + +<p>“<em>1st Nov.</em>—Aarif Bey came again to tell me that he had +arranged with Ahmed Bey, the Sultan’s <em>Chef de Cabinet +politique</em>, that we should meet to-night at the theatre and +have a talk, and he thinks that then Ahmed Bey, who sees the Sultan +every day, will arrange for an audience Monday or Tuesday, and I +have told him that I cannot and will not stay past Wednesday, when +the French steamer starts. Aarif, in spite of his revolutionary +projects in Kurdistan, is on confidential terms with the Sultan’s +Cabinet, and sends them reports on political subjects. When we saw +him in England in 1882 he seems to have had something of a private +mission, and has clearer ideas of English political parties than is +usual with foreigners. His estimates of Gladstone, Salisbury, and +Dilke were correct, and he described how, after an interview with +Salisbury, in which he, Salisbury, had held language entirely +favourable to the Sultan’s rights in Egypt, he had gone the next +day to hear him speak exactly in the opposite sense in the House of +Lords. I asked him about the relations existing<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_333">[333]</span> between the Sultan and Russia, +and he told me that all the advances at present were on the side of +Russia, that the Sultan only trusted the Germans, who, he remarked, +could not possibly help him; that he still had some trust in Lord +Salisbury with regard to Egypt, if he should come into power again, +but that he knew perfectly well that there was no material help to +be expected from England any more. I told him I was quite of that +opinion. Whatever else we might do, we were quite certain never to +send any more troops to help the Sultan against a European Power, +and that, if I had to advise for his good, it would be to make an +alliance with Russia. Russia, of course, never could be a friend, +but if they could tide over the next twenty-five years, there might +well be a revolution there, a European war, or heaven knew what. +But Russia was the greatest danger Turkey had, for it menaced it in +Asia, and the conquest of Asia Minor would be an end of all things. +Aarif quite agreed with this and said that if England continued in +her present line of policy, an alliance with Russia was inevitable. +The only thing that prevented it was that the Russian Government +was <em>tellement canaille</em>, that the Sultan would not trust +them, but he would be driven to it.</p> + +<p>“Aarif also gave us a capital account of the way Lord Dufferin +had tricked the Sultan in the matter of the proclamation of Arabi’s +rebellion. The Sultan, he assured me, still had a kindly feeling +for Arabi, and it was entirely against the grain that he had issued +the proclamation. But Dufferin had bullied him by threatening to +leave Constantinople, or acknowledge Abd-el-Mutalleb, the Sherif of +Mecca, Caliph. Afterwards, when the Sultan wanted to sign the +convention for sending troops, Dufferin went off to the Princes +Islands and could not be got at.<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_334">[334]</span> There had been a great debate among the +Ulema as to the legality of the proclamation, and he, Aarif +himself, had pronounced strongly against it on the ground of a +certain <em>hadith</em> which declared every Mohammedan justified +in defending Mohammedan interests against the infidel, whether with +the Caliph’s sanction or without it. He also told us about his +visit to the Oxford and British Museums, and the Arabic documents +he had found there.</p> + +<p>“Next we went to tea successively at the German and Russian +Embassies. At the latter we made acquaintance with M. Onou, the +Chancellier, who knows Syria well and something of the desert. We +talked about Arabia, and I think I made some impression on Nélidof +by the warmth of my pleadings. His wife has a great hatred for Lord +Dufferin. She was a Princess, and her brother was the owner of that +stud of 150 horses which was burnt last year.</p> + +<p>“At half past six Aarif returned and took us to dine at a +restaurant, and we went on to the theatre, but Ahmed Bey +Jellal-ed-Din was not there, and had sent us a message by Ahmed +Pasha, another aide-de-camp, to say that the Sultan had kept him on +service. The play was, I forget what—the ‘Princess Something.’ I +hate these things.</p> + +<p>“I have forgotten the principal event of the day, the visit of +Ahmed Minshawi. He came early in the morning, having been sent by +the Syrian banker. It is clear that Ismaïl Jowdat did not intend +him to see us, and they have quarrelled about something, as they +all do. Minshawi is a true fellah of the Arabi type, but altogether +inferior to him, a large, nervous, heavy-handed man, with his eyes +rather too close together, and a general heaviness relieved by +occasional flashes. He was very difficult at first to reassure, and +explained that he had been so hunted for<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_335">[335]</span> the last two years by the police that he +had lost all his courage. It is not given to every one, he said, to +be courageous, and he lamented his fallen fortunes. ‘I used to be a +man of large wealth. I lived like a prince at home, respected by +all, surrounded by friends, and confident in myself. Now I am +treated as a <em>fakir</em>. The Turks have no bowels of +compassion. They have no charity. With us the stranger is +respected. Here he is watched by the police,—and he asked nervously +whether there was any one listening, as the door creaked. ‘I used +to have four thousand acres of good land worth £60 or £70 each (I +am not sure of the figures), and half a dozen steamers on the +river. Now I receive not £20 a year from my property. I am driven +out of my home and live as I can on what remains to me of the ready +money I took with me.’ The tears rolled down from his eyes as he +spoke, and he sat for some minutes silent on the sofa weeping.</p> + +<p>“I asked him to tell me how it all came about, and he said it +was from his having interfered to save the lives of the Christians +at Tantah. He had gone into Tantah that morning thinking of +nothing, and when he saw the people being killed he had lost his +temper and laid about him with his stick to stop them, and he had +expostulated with the Mudir, and he had taken 150 of the people, +Syrians, Jews, or Greeks, to his country house, and had kept them +at his own cost during the war. The people who had got up the riot +were Ibrahim Adhem and his wakil, Mehariz, who is now Mudir. These +two were solely answerable for it. He had heard of Osman Rafaat’s +coming to Tantah, but had not seen him. I asked him about Abu Diab. +‘<em>Wallah!</em>’ he said, ‘if there was one innocent in the world +it was Abu Diab.’ I then tried to get out of him what his political +views were.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_336">[336]</span> But he +was very cautious, after the manner of his people. ‘If,’ he said, +‘you were to take an ox or a camel or an ape, or even a hare, and +give it to the Egyptians as their Governor, they would be grateful +and loyal to it. Before the war we loved the English, but we do not +love them now. They have destroyed us, and they have given us to +those who have no mercy.’ After much pressing, I got out of him +that he would like Abbas with a regent, Riaz, or, if it were +possible, Arabi. He said Riaz because he would keep order, but +Arabi the people would like far better. He did not wish Ismaïl. He +should have no objection to Halim. But any one would be acceptable +so long as Tewfik went away. I urged him to come to England to give +evidence, and he said he would, but what was he to do with the +family? His family was here, and he had no friend to leave them +with. I fear he is a rather helpless ally. Still we must make what +use of him we can, and he is to come again on Monday.</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd Nov., Sunday.</em>—By steamer to Roumeli Hissar to have +luncheon with Halim Pasha, and take leave. But we unfortunately +missed the boat, and did not get there till nearly two o’clock. The +Princess is certainly a very charming person, and still a pretty +woman. She gave us luncheon in the kiosk in the garden, a very +handsome room. Some Turkish dishes, among others one of chicken +with walnut sauce. Afterwards I had a long talk with Halim. +Explained to him how the war had been brought about, and Mr. +Gladstone’s desire to be rid of Egypt, and begged him to further my +design of bringing forward now the charges against the Khedive, by +sending Ismaïl Jowdat and Mustafa Bey to England. And he promised +to send them and to get them to agree with Minshawi not to quarrel. +At going away<span class="pagenum" id="Page_337">[337]</span> I +said to the Prince: ‘I suppose it is understood between us that if +Your Highness returns to Egypt, Arabi is to return too.’ He said: +‘You may count upon it. I have never had any other idea, and I only +regret that I have not been able sooner to put myself in direct +communication with him. All the exiles shall be recalled.’ I like +Halim more the more I see him. He is plain spoken and direct in all +he says.</p> + +<p>“His Beatitude Stephen Peter X, Monseigneur Azarian, Patriarch +of the Catholic Armenians, called on us. He is a dignified and +intelligent man, to whom we had brought letters from Madame +Volodkowich; and he told us in detail the Armenian situation. The +desire of the Catholic Armenians was to have such a government as +that of the Lebanon. They did not want to be separated from the +Porte, as their greatest danger was absorption by Russia. But the +administration had become worse than it had ever been, and the +people would bear it no longer. With regard to the Kurds, he said +they were much less fanatical than the Turks, and the accounts of +their misdeeds were very much exaggerated. He was sure that, if +they had a government like that of the Lebanon, they would all live +together very peaceably. The Turkish Government favoured the +Catholics, as they did not conspire with Russia, which the Orthodox +did. But even these did not wish Armenia to be absorbed by +Russia.</p> + +<p>“Of the Sultan he gave the most favourable account I have yet +heard. He says that he has known personally four Sultans, and Abdul +Hamid is far the best of them, and perhaps the best Sultan there +ever was. He is a good man, and works hard to know everything +concerning his country, and is most intelligent. He has no vices, +has few women, neither<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_338">[338]</span> drinks nor amuses himself, and is severely +economical. He has no debts, paying everything, down to the last +detail of his household, every Thursday. He knew this as the +Sultan’s accountant is an Armenian Catholic. Only, all his servants +are bad, and he trusts no one. The Government of the Porte is worse +than it ever was, a mere den of corruption, and it is impossible +that a catastrophe is not impending. The Greeks in Roumelia are all +members of secret societies, and so are the Syrians, and one of +these days it will occur. The finance will break down, for nobody +is paid and the people are all coming to beggary. Everything can be +bought. The new Greek Patriarch of Jerusalem is a man whose name +stands first on the list of those dangerous to the Empire, as he is +a head centre of Pan-slavism. Yet he procured his nomination by +spending money. All was going to ruin, and would go to ruin. He, +the Patriarch, was sorry for it. A worthy old man. Peace be with +His Beatitude.</p> + +<p>“<em>3rd Nov.</em>—Our first visitor was Ahmed Minshawi, from +whom we got additional details, and I have drawn up a statement of +the evidence he is prepared to give, which will be most +valuable.<a id="FNanchor_90"></a><a href="#Footnote_90" class= +"fnanchor">[90]</a> As he gets more confidence his face lights up, +and he acquires even a certain eloquence. He reminds me every now +and then of Arabi, typical fellahin both. He was driven away by the +arrival of Doctor Dickenson. [Here follows Doctor Dickenson’s +account of the death of Abdul Aziz, which has been related +previously in my ‘Secret History,’ see pages 52 to 55.] Dr. +Dickenson is a very precise old gentleman, and the sort of witness +whose evidence would be accepted by any jury in the world. I +therefore entirely believe his account. Midhat and<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_339">[339]</span> Damad, he told us, died in +chains at Taïf, some months ago, having been starved to death. +Midhat’s end was hastened by a carbuncle, but he was none the less +made away with. The Sheykh el Islam has also recently died there +who gave the fetwa authorizing Abdul Aziz’s deposition. This act of +terror has given Abdul Hamid the absolute power he now holds.</p> + +<p>“We went to the Russian Embassy again to say good-bye, and see +some horses given by the Sultan to Nélidof. The horses are of no +great account, a chestnut and a gray worth £50 or £60 a piece.</p> + +<p>“Coming back we found Mustafa Bey, and we have arranged that he +is to encourage Minshawi, and when we telegraph come with him to +England and give his evidence. Ismaïl Jowdat also came in. We wrote +out a <em>procès verbal</em> for Minshawi to sign. What I intend to +do is to invite Mr. Gladstone to examine the evidence privately, or +appoint Trevelyan or somebody of equivalent integrity to examine +it. If he refuses I shall do it publicly. Ismaïl Jowdat will come +at once with us to England.</p> + +<p>“While we were talking, Aarif Bey came in with a message from +Ahmed Bey to the effect that they had been afraid to present my +request of an audience to the Sultan; but that they had spoken of +my wish to see the horses, etc., and that the Sultan had been most +gracious, and would send an aide-de-camp to-morrow to show us over +the stables and the palace. I confess the story did not sound to me +quite coherent, and Selim Faris, who looked in later, tells me that +he has just been to the palace, and that the true account of it is +that Munir did give my letter to the Sultan, but that he wishes to +put off on others the responsibility of not answering it, that he +is as usual undecided, and would like to find out a +little<span class="pagenum" id="Page_340">[340]</span> more about +me first, and he will probably send an aide-de-camp on purpose to +report concerning me to-morrow. He will see me later if I will only +wait. But I can’t wait. The Sultan asked Zaffir about me on Friday, +but Zaffir pretended he had never heard of me. This invitation to +the palace and stables is at any rate a proof that he is not +ill-disposed, and we must make the most of it. The idea of the +palace at present is that nothing new will come on in Egypt till +next summer, and he thinks if I come back then I shall be able to +do a great deal. Perhaps he is right. In any case we shall not have +wasted our time here.</p> + +<p>“Our last visitor was Mr. de Leon, formerly American +Consul-General at Cairo, now agent of a company for making a +ship-railway over the isthmus of Akaba. The scheme seems to me +chimerical from the fact that Suez is a far easier, shorter, and +more direct route.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th Nov.</em>—Ismaïl Jowdat came in the morning, having +written out the evidence given us by Minshawi in Arabic for him to +sign. But Minshawi did not appear till too late, for we had to go +out at a quarter to one to the old Seraglio, where the Sultan had +appointed an aide-de-camp to meet us and show us everything. This +<em>Serai</em> is a delightful old place, and the position the +finest, without exception, in the world. By good luck the +aide-de-camp on duty was old Vefyk Pasha’s son, an extremely nice, +intelligent young man, who knew the history of the various Sultans +well, and so was able to explain us everything. We were received in +State and conducted round by the whole staff of the Palace. The +Treasury is full of interesting things which belong to the domain +of Murray. But what was to me most attractive was the series of +effigies of the Sultans<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_341">[341]</span> dressed in their actual clothes. This +recalls past glories better than anything else could do. Mahmud’s +miserable hussar jacket closes the series, but there are lower +depths still since, left unrepresented. The young man confessed +himself ashamed of his wretched uniform and fez, a rare instance of +good taste in a modern Oriental. In the kiosk we drank the Sultan’s +coffee, which I confess I only sipped, remembering its fatal name. +The Dolmabakji to which we were next taken is without interest +inside, and we were disappointed of our promised visit to the +stables, as the Sultan was having the horses paraded at the Yildiz +Palace in order to choose one for an Ambassador. At least such was +the excuse given—but I half suspect they were afraid of our +criticism. The visit to the palaces is, however, a proof of the +Sultan’s goodwill, and when I thanked the young man and gave him a +message of thanks to the Sultan he told me that they all knew of me +as a defender of Islam and a friend.</p> + +<p>“Selim Faris, who came in the evening, tells me it was Musurus +(the Turkish Ambassador in London) who set the Sultan against me, +telling him that I was seeking to found an Arabian Empire; but he +is now undeceived. He advises me to write a memorandum of my ideas +to the Sultan.</p> + +<p>“<em>5th Nov.</em>—Ahmed Minshawi came and signed his evidence +(see <a href="#Page_558">Appendix</a>). Mustafa Bey Nejdi also +called, and then Count Corti, to wish us goodbye, and we went on +board the French steamer, having spent three weeks at +Constantinople, an interesting visit, though our main object of +seeing the Sultan remained unachieved. It was a dark evening with a +huge bank of black clouds to the north, signs of winter in the +Black Sea, when we steamed out of the Golden Horn and passed +Seraglio point and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_342">[342]</span> +the city walls on our way home. Ismaïl Jowdat goes with us.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th Nov.</em>—Really there never was such good fortune. On +board there is an acquaintance of Ismaïl’s, Mohammed Assad Bey, +Muteserif of Candia, on his way to his post, uncle-in-law of our +friend Aarif Bey. He is by birth one of the hereditary Kurdish +chiefs, but exiled at the age of seventeen (he is now fifty-seven) +on account of his father’s rebellion—a most interesting man. He has +been many years in Crete, and has seen many changes in the Empire, +all for the worse. He lamented the quarrels between England and +Islam, which he attributed to its true causes, first, the obstinacy +of the Porte in effecting no reforms, and secondly, the dishonesty +of England in regard to Egypt. In regard to the latter, he said +what they all say and to which there is no answer, that the English +caused misgovernment in Egypt so as to have an excuse for taking +it. He said that all his life he had been accustomed to respect +Englishmen as men of just dealing, but they were changed and he +respected them no more. If he had not seen Ismaïl Jowdat with us, +he should not have cared to make our acquaintance. From having the +best reputation in the East the English had now the worst. About +his own country, Kurdistan, he talked much in the sense that Aarif +had done—only he seemed to see less hope in the trouble which was +coming. The Russians he said were very busy stirring up the +Christian Armenians, and the thing would break out in the spring. +It would begin with the Armenians, then the Kurds would take up +arms in self-defence. There would be stories of bloodshed and +massacre greatly exaggerated, and the Russians would take it as a +pretext for intervention. The Turks had about 150,000 +Nizams<span class="pagenum" id="Page_343">[343]</span> in Asia +Minor, and the Kurds could put a far greater number under arms. But +he augured ill for the result. The Russians wanted Mesopotamia and +Bagdad and Bussora. The Turks could fight well, but they had no +leader. All the Turkish commanders were corrupt and selfish, and +they would be bribed again by the Russians. I asked him who was the +natural Kurdish leader, and he said: ‘There are several hundred +Kurds in the Custom House at Galata. Yesterday, when I passed +through, they all bowed.’ His elder brother, however, would seem to +be the man, and this agrees with Aarif’s account. Obeidallah is the +religious chief only. In the evening Ismaïl Jowdat gave a full +account of all he knew in connection with Arabi and the events of +1881. [The substance of what I learned from him is embodied in his +statement (see <a href="#Page_555">Appendix</a>).]</p> + +<p>“<em>12th Nov.</em>—We arrived without incident at Marseilles +and went on immediately to Paris.”</p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_344">[344]</span><a id= +"c10"></a>CHAPTER X</h2> + +<p class="sch1">GORDON’S DEATH. CHAOS</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">“<em>13th Nov.</em> 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="nind space-above15"><span class="dcap2">“I</span> HAVE +been away from home just two months—it seems like six, and I shall +be glad when it is over. I called to-day on Lord Lyons but found +him uncommunicative. We talked a while about things at +Constantinople, as to which he affected to know very little, and I +told him I thought the Government would be well advised to make its +peace with the Sultan. He thought this would be easy now that +Dufferin had left Constantinople, and discussed possible or rather +impossible appointments of a successor. Layard, he said, has been +put out of all chance by the publication of his last despatch. He +asked me about Goschen, though saying he certainly would not go +back, as he wanted to remain in England. He also talked a little +about Dufferin’s chances of success in India, but said nothing that +was of the least importance.</p> + +<p>“There is a report again to-day that Khartoum is taken, and this +time it seems better founded.</p> + +<p>“<em>14th Nov.</em>—We breakfasted with the Wagrams at Voisin’s. +They had come in on purpose from Gros Bois. Afterwards I called on +Sheffield, who as usual told me a great deal. Northbrook and Baring +have been concocting a report to please Gladstone. It will say that +everything is going on for the best in Egypt, and propose some +temporary financial arrangements, the reduction of the Egyptian +army, a loan of eight millions, and a speedy evacuation; all the +administration to be in Egyptian hands, and nothing at all in the +shape of a protectorate. On the contrary, Egypt is to be put under +international control as<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_345">[345]</span> before proposed. This has throughout been +Mr. Gladstone’s policy. Baring has insisted on all English employés +in Egypt reporting in this sense, and refuses to forward their +views if in contradiction. He only wants to flatter Gladstone and +hopes to be transferred to an Embassy. He will very likely go to +Constantinople. Hartington and Dilke, on the other hand, are +determined on a Protectorate, and on pushing on to Khartoum and +establishing a Government there with an English Governor—on staying +in Egypt and treating the whole thing like an Indian principality. +Sheffield says, however, that the Powers won’t stand this. Bismarck +is now hand in glove with the French and will give our Government a +slap in the face. He has given them one about the Congo, and he +means to give another about Egypt. He will probably propose to +settle the Egyptian question over the head of England. He was very +angry at the stopping of the sinking fund having been done without +consulting him. It was not Northbrook’s plan, who had no idea but +that of conciliating the European Powers and the Europeans in +Egypt. But when he telegraphed that money must be had, and proposed +that the English Government should supply £300,000 for immediate +necessities, Gladstone settled the matter the other way, saying +that he had promised Parliament that no money should be expended +without their leave. Granville, in all he does, only consults Mr. +Gladstone’s fancies, knowing that his only hold on office is +through him. He has no policy of any kind except to obey the Old +Man; he likes office and he likes his pay, and hangs on. He knows +he will never be in office again. Gladstone only consults the +electors. Between them the whole thing is going to indescribable +pot.</p> + +<p>“Malet’s appointment to Berlin is simply Bismarck’s<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_346">[346]</span> nomination. He refused Morier +on the ground that he was an intriguer, and insisted on having +Malet, and our Government, being on their knees to him, consented. +Sheffield is of opinion that we shall have the whole of Europe on +our back in a very short time.</p> + +<p>“Now we start to-night for England.</p> + +<p>“<em>15th Nov.</em>—Arrived in London by the early train from +Paris. My first visit as soon as it was light was to Button, who +gave me all the news. Northbrook has come back from Egypt, a more +complete failure than any of his predecessors. He was taken hold of +there by the Greeks and other commercial residents, and wrote a +report, recommending a policy of financial disinterestedness on the +part of England. The coupons of the Suez Canal shares were to be +cut, England was to pay the Army of Occupation, and finally to +advance £20,000,000 without security. But none of his colleagues +will hear of such an arrangement, and he has been made to suppress +his Report—and there is some talk even of his retiring from the +Cabinet. He is delighted with the Khedive and the whole gang, as +was sure to be the case. Hartington and Dilke, when he came home, +told him he was an ass, and Button thinks they will get their way +in the end. This way is to guarantee three per cent. on all the +debts, and assume a Protectorate. He says that Gladstone will +certainly not listen to a word against Tewfik, but thinks I may as +well write to him, and propose to bring my new evidence against +him. The style of argument we may expect to be met with is that all +Oriental evidence is worthless. At the time when Churchill was +bringing on the case against the Khedive last year, he, Button, was +staying with Northbrook in the country, and he told him +how<span class="pagenum" id="Page_347">[347]</span> important it +was that the matter should be hushed up. With regard to native +evidence Northbrook said: ‘I have always made it a rule to listen +to all that can be produced, but I do not let it influence me, I +judge by the antecedent probabilities of the case.’ ‘You refer I +suppose to the Baroda case,’ said Button maliciously. ‘Well, yes,’ +he answered—‘that was my method, and I think it the safest +one.’</p> + +<p>“Then to Gregory’s. Sir William was at Dalmeny with Gladstone, +and had a great deal of talk there with Eddy Hamilton about Egypt, +and about me. Eddy talked nicely about me, but Gregory confirms +what Button says, that Gladstone is as wrapped up in Tewfik as +ever. This is our great difficulty. To Crabbet in the evening.</p> + +<p>“<em>19th Nov.</em>—Again to London. Wolseley is in a mess. The +Nile Expedition can’t get on, and Gordon writes that he can only +hold out to a certain date. Wolseley is going to make a rush for +Khartoum with a few hundred men, but it is thought doubtful whether +he will succeed. My letter offering to re-open the evidence against +the Khedive in the matter of the Alexandrian riot has gone in to +Gladstone, having been looked over by Gregory, and a sentence +altered.<a id="FNanchor_91"></a><a href="#Footnote_91" class= +"fnanchor">[91]</a></p> + +<p>“Dined at the Carlton, where I found the big-wigs of the Party +very busy over the compromise of the Franchise Bill. I felt rather +like a spy among them, though heaven knows I care nothing +whatsoever about their politics. Only I fancy they look upon me as +a damned Radical. Leconfield was there and we talked a little about +horses.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th Nov.</em>—Called on Stanley of Alderley, who lives in +a garret, leaving all the rooms of his house empty. He says the +Ottoman Empire will outlive the British. <em>Inshallah!</em></p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_348">[348]</span>“Luncheon with +Lady C., who assured me the Prince of Wales is coming round to my +view of things in Egypt, but he is not Prime Minister and can do +nothing. Dined at the Gregorys’, and sat between Layard and the +Servian Minister. The latter assured me the Servian Government was +doing all it could to retain the Mohammedan population, while +orderly and law-abiding, but they would not stay.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st Nov.</em>—Amir Ali, who is in London and whom I saw +to-day, tells me that Cordery is going on as ill as ever at +Hyderabad. He talked of a dinner at the Northbrook Club, at which +Dufferin had made a speech and explained to the Indian Mohammedans +present what a great advantage it was for him, now he was to be +Viceroy of India, to have resided so long at Constantinople, and to +be in such cordial relations with the head of their religion! The +Sultan was a most admirable man, and they were the greatest of +friends! There never was a greater humbug than Dufferin.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd Nov.</em>—Saw Button in the City. He tells me Gordon +has sent word to say he can only hold out six weeks from the fourth +of November. This not on account of provisions, which are +plentiful, but of ammunition. Wolseley consequently intends to make +a rush across the desert from Debbeh, and expects to be at Khartoum +with the New Year. All the telegrams published about Gordon’s +recent successes are military lies. The ‘Times’ is very angry with +Northbrook for what he said yesterday in the House of Lords, and is +seeking an occasion to waylay him.<a id="FNanchor_92"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_92" class="fnanchor">[92]</a> Buckle is not a revengeful +man, but it is<span class="pagenum" id="Page_349">[349]</span> the +‘Times’ tradition not to forgive. Chenery used generally to do this +himself, waiting his occasion patiently, and then himself writing +the article, which he could do better than anybody else.</p> + +<p>“<em>25th Nov.</em>—Wrote to Eddy to hasten on an answer from +Mr. Gladstone. Called on Gregory to consult what was to be done. +Churchill is going away to India and Ceylon next week, and I hardly +know how to act in regard to him.</p> + +<p>“<em>26th Nov.</em>—Khartoum is again surrounded by twenty-five +thousand men, and the Mahdi holds the passes between that and +Debbeh. If so, Wolseley’s rush will be a dangerous proceeding. +Button tells me he means to take three thousand men with him and +artillery, but I doubt his getting through and back with so +few.</p> + +<p>“Mr. Gladstone’s answer has come: ‘In view of my inhibition to +refer me to the Foreign Office, he can only acknowledge the receipt +of my letter.’ My proposal had been that he should himself examine +the fresh evidence against the Khedive Tewfik.</p> + +<p>“<em>27th Nov.</em>—To Robert Bourke’s. We talked over affairs +at Constantinople, which he understands. He is all for coming to +terms with the Sultan about Egypt. ‘If I had anything to do with +it,’ he said, ‘it is the first thing I should do.’ About renewing +the charges against the Khedive, Bourke was very adverse to +anything being done. ‘If you proved the case to demonstration, it +could only do harm, for Tewfik is necessary for English policy in +Egypt. Besides, the case is dead now, and you could not get any one +to take interest in it.’ About India he was curious to know whether +Lord Ripon had really <em>promised</em> Salar Jung to restore the +Berar provinces, and seemed to think the Foreign Office at +Calcutta<span class="pagenum" id="Page_350">[350]</span> quite +right in resisting it.<a id="FNanchor_93"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_93" class="fnanchor">[93]</a> There is little to choose +between the two parties as to these things.</p> + +<p>“Next to Randolph Churchill. He is going to India on Wednesday, +and I found him in so open a frame of mind as to Indian politics, +that I agreed to give him letters to some of my friends there so +that he may hear the native side of the case. I think it quite +possible he may take a right view, and if so he will be an +invaluable ally. He has just published in the ‘Pall Mall Gazette,’ +a sort of manifesto which is wildly democratic, and as popularity +is his guide in politics it may well be that he will look to it in +India also. He is fond of large and novel conceptions, and Tory +democracy might easily be made a cry there, too. So I risk it. +Nothing can be worse for India than the Whigs. Talking about Egypt, +Randolph told me he had just seen Rothschild who had news from +Berlin that Bismarck had declared his intention of supporting +France in any answer she might give to the English finance +proposals, and Randolph seemed to consider that all the fat would +be in the fire. Button told me yesterday that Rothschild held an +Egyptian bill for a million sterling, and had made up his mind to +present it at date, that is to say about Christmas, and so make the +Egyptian Government bankrupt. I said nothing to Randolph about our +new evidence against Tewfik, as he is so imprudent. He is going to +Ceylon, and I have promised to announce his arrival, and have +warned him of the little split there is among the exiles. In spite +of his faults it is impossible not to like Churchill. He has so +much <em>bonhomie</em> and so little pretension. This is the secret +of his success. I am depressed all the same at the aspect of +things. I see no prospect now of getting back to Egypt. Randolph +told me even he dared<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_351">[351]</span> not go there as the Government would make +it too disagreeable for him, not to say dangerous. He had thought +of spending the winter at Cairo, but he had decided not to risk +it.</p> + +<p>“<em>30th Nov.</em>—Stead writes that he is ‘hungering and +thirsting’ to see me, as he hears I have all the latest news of the +Mahdi, and he has an idea of sending me to make peace with him, and +asks for an interview.</p> + +<p>“<em>1st Dec.</em>—Stead came at one, and we had two hours of +it. I told him peace could easily be made with the Mahdi, but it +must be through the Sultan and not Tewfik. He understood, he said, +that I was in constant communication with the Mahdi, and thought +that when Wolseley got to Khartoum I might go and open +negotiations, and a deal more which, as he is going to develop it +into an interview for the ‘Pall Mall,’ I need not write. I heard +later from Button that it was he who had suggested the thing +through Reginald Brett, and it appears that he, Button, has all +along been putting it about that I have communications with the +Mahdi. He says that the French will accept the English financial +proposals for Egypt. Malet has been a great success at Berlin. +Bismarck has been pacified by concessions on the Congo. Lord +Granville is to make peace with the Chinese for Mr. Ferry, who in +return will accept the proposals. Italy is to be compensated in +Tripoli, and the general portioning of plunder to begin. I don’t +believe the French will accept, as their game in Egypt is too good +a one. Button tells me the proposals were drafted by Hartington and +only accepted by the Cabinet on the distinct understanding that if +they broke down we were to clear bodily out of Egypt. It is a toss +up which way it goes.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th Dec.</em>—(After several days’ shooting in +the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_352">[352]</span> country, and a +visit to the Wyndhams at Wilbury.) To London and saw Button. He +tells me a deal of news. The French and other Governments, he is +sure, will accept the financial proposals for Egypt. Should this +fail there will be a split in the Cabinet, and Gladstone will go +out of office. Hartington, Northbrook, Dilke and the rest are for +guaranteeing the debt. Gladstone will not do this. They will try to +carry things on by letting Egypt go bankrupt, then if Europe won’t +stand this Mr. Gladstone will resign, Lord Salisbury will pass the +Redistribution Bill, and Dissolution will follow at the end of the +year. Button himself is off to Tunis for six weeks with his brother +Mayo—a sporting trip.</p> + +<p>“Dined with Bertram Currie. Bertram has the same idea as Button +about the financial proposals; can’t understand the French being +such damned fools as to refuse them. His only wish as an Englishman +is to get out of Egypt; his only fear that we may be trapped into +staying. We are the only thing that stands between Egypt and +anarchy, etc., etc. He is not quite so confident, however, as he +used to be, and talked of Northbrook as having made a fool of +himself; Northbrook is so jealous of Dilke or anybody else going to +Egypt that he had insisted on going himself.</p> + +<p>“<em>15th Dec.</em>—Dinner of the National Arbitration and Peace +Association in honour of Hodgson Pratt. I was asked to return +thanks on behalf of the visitors, and I brought forward the +question of peace with the Mahdi, which was very well received. It +is arranged I am to write a letter to Pratt, stating my views, and +to have it published. There were about two hundred people at the +dinner, which was given at the Criterion. Pratt is a most estimable +man, and his Association has a laudable object, but I +doubt<span class="pagenum" id="Page_353">[353]</span> its +succeeding in the face of the growing brutality of the world, and I +am not at all sure that if it did it would not be a bad thing for +the East. The best chance for the East is, that the nations of +Europe should destroy each other.</p> + +<p>“<em>17th Dec.</em>—Broadley called with a long story about +presents made by Ismaïl Pasha to the King of Italy. He, Broadley, +is in Ismaïl’s pay in respect to a lawsuit pending in Egypt. He +talked also a good deal about Rochefort and the Communist party, +with whom he is intimate in Paris. There is a scheme for annexing +Morocco, and the Communists are doing all they can to prevent +it.</p> + +<p>“At the dinner to Pratt there was some talk of my standing for +Greenwich as Home Ruler at next elections. This is the only +platform I could stand on.</p> + +<p>“<em>19th Dec.</em>—Stead and Appleton (Secretary of the Peace +and Arbitration Society) came to see me, and we had two hours’ +discussion. Stead has just been staying with Auberon Herbert, and +was in high feather—a man of genius in his way—very anxious to +expound my whole plan in the ‘Pall Mall.’ But I would not let him +do this if it was to have a chance of succeeding. It was a +brilliant talk, and resulted in our deciding that a deputation +should wait upon the G.O.M. with which I am to be smuggled in so as +to get at him. My letter to Pratt about peace with the Mahdi is +published in the ‘Times’ and ‘Daily News,’ so I am committed to +action if called upon.</p> + +<p>“Lunched at the Carlton with Wynford. That noble Lord has his +own explanation of our failure in Egypt. ‘You may take my word for +it,’ he said, ‘it all comes of our officials there working on +Sundays, it is a breach of the decalogue which leads to other +breaches.’</p> + +<p>“<em>20th Dec.</em>—Crabbet. Hunted in a snow storm +on<span class="pagenum" id="Page_354">[354]</span> the Downs. On +our return found a Mr. Wheeler come to interview me for the Press +Association. I declined to let him print anything of my plans. He +is an Irishman and an amusing fellow, and had some good stories +about people he had interviewed. He had had to hunt officially with +the Empress of Austria one season in Cheshire, the Press +Association keeping three horses for him for the purpose. She rode +well—but did not choose her own line. Lady Rock-Savage rode much +better. If Middleton, Bay Middleton, who piloted the Empress, got a +fall, the Empress always stopped.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd Dec.</em>—The ‘Times’ has a leading article on my +proposal of going to the Soudan, politer than is usual with them, +but of course not favourable. Wrote an answer going up in the +train, and went to the ‘Pall Mall’ office and gave Stead leave to +write an interview, and then lunched at the Gregorys’. The only +possible way to pull this thing through is by the press; not that I +want at all to go to the Soudan. I have other things far more +important to do. But the Soudan is the thin end of the wedge and we +must drive it in if possible.</p> + +<p>“At six o’clock to a meeting of the Arbitration and Peace +Committee, where I found them quite prepared to let things alone. +But Karl Blind backed me up, and it was voted ‘unanimously and +enthusiastically,’ that Mr. Gladstone should be requested to employ +my services. Afterwards I had an interview with a so-called agent +of the Mahdi, whom Ismaïl Jowdat has brought to England. There is a +kind of committee here in London of Oriental sympathizers with the +Mahdi, consisting of thirty persons, who meet every night at a room +they have hired for the purpose. Ibrahim Bey is not an attractive +man, an Arabic speaking Egyptian, with<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_355">[355]</span> the true Egyptian eyes, but with a curl in +his hair and a very low forehead. In Oriental dress I daresay all +this would be concealed, but he wears French clothes and has +discarded even the fez. He is not attractive. His conversation was +more interesting than his face: he assured me there would be no +difficulty in my going to the Mahdi. The best route would be by +Massowa, as the road that way would be open, and he promised to +send word at once, that some of the Mahdi’s men should be on the +look out that way for my coming. Mohammed Obeyd, he said, Arabi’s +right-hand man, is now the Mahdi’s General, and of course would +receive me well. He made his escape after Tel-el-Kebir to Tripoli, +and thence to the Soudan.<a id="FNanchor_94"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_94" class="fnanchor">[94]</a> The Mahdi also knows me +well by name. I should have to go by Constantinople, but +arrangements would be made so as to assure me a quick reception +there. The whole thing would take just six weeks. Ibrahim Bey will +go with us, if I like, on Wednesday as part of the Peace Deputation +to Hawarden, but he is hardly a presentable man.</p> + +<p>“<em>23rd Dec.</em>—My ‘Times’ letter is published, and in the +morning Stead sent me a proof of his interview to correct, a +ridiculous thing which I had to rewrite. [The proof was brought by +an office boy, with a message that it was to go to press in an +hour, and it was a mere accident that I was at home and able to +stop it. It contained, among other extravagances put into my mouth, +that Egypt would be better annexed than continue ill-governed as it +was, an idea which, if Stead’s, was certainly not mine. When I saw +Stead later in the day and expostulated<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_356">[356]</span> with him about this, his answer was +characteristic. ‘Well,’ he said, ‘if you did not say it, it is just +what you ought to have said.’]</p> + +<p>“<em>24th Dec.</em>—Christmas Eve. By the 10.10 train to Chester +with the Peace Deputation to see Mr. Gladstone. It was to have +consisted of three persons, but Karl Blind and Dr. Clark missed the +train, so I had Martin Wood to myself. I never had much idea that +Gladstone would see any of us, and I was certain he would not see +me. So we first sent a telegram from Chester to say that ‘Mr. Wood +had been deputed by the Arbitration Society to wait on Mr. +Gladstone, and that he had brought two gentlemen conversant with +Soudan affairs with him’—Jowdat, who had come with me, and me. I +made Wood add something about Christmas Eve to give us a +countenance, and, without waiting for an answer, we set off in a +fly to Hawarden. The only chance was to rush Mr. Gladstone before +he knew who we were, and we almost succeeded. We were evidently not +expected, and were received at the door by a young footman new to +his work, who said Mr. Gladstone was at home, and if Wood had had +the presence of mind to go in all might have been well. But he +fumbled about for a card, and the footman disappeared, only to be +succeeded by the butler, an old hand, who promptly said +‘Deputation,’ and with very little ceremony turned us out. Wood +weakly argued and appealed to the man’s feelings. But Mr. Gladstone +was ‘finishing his letters for the post, and then would have his +dinner,’ and we were shown the door. Going back to Chester we +plucked up courage, and drafted a letter, in which we endeavoured +to turn the tables, or at any rate to conceal our defeat. We +consoled ourselves by thinking that we were fighting in a good +cause, that<span class="pagenum" id="Page_357">[357]</span> Mr. +Gladstone must feel ashamed of himself turning away a deputation of +peace on Christmas Eve. It was the climax of all. Here he was +making a senseless war for no object he dared avow, and afraid to +look honest people in the face. Shade of Midlothian! We sat on at +the Chester Hotel till two, and then took the Irish mail back to +London—arriving in the gray of Christmas morning, and bitter +cold.</p> + +<p>“<em>25th Dec.</em>—Down early to Crabbet, feeling ‘the +satisfaction of a good conscience.’ The ‘Pall Mall’ has published +my revised interview, but of course the Government won’t accept my +offer.</p> + +<p>“<em>26th Dec.</em>—Martin Wood’s letter, the one we wrote to +Mr. Gladstone at Chester, is in all the papers in the largest type, +and the ‘Daily News’ has an inspired letter, placing all the blame +of the situation on Bismarck.</p> + +<p>“Hunted with Leconfield’s hounds, the meet at Drungwitch, and +had a good old-fashioned run of two hours, through Plaistow into +Sydney wood. Kars carried me capitally. Anne rode Queen of +Sheba.</p> + +<p>“<em>30th Dec.</em>—Hunted with Leconfield at New Bridge, a run +of an hour and twenty minutes, I on Rataplan, Anne on Proximo (two +Arabs we had brought from India). It was a very rough bit of +country, and it is really astonishing that these horses who have +never been across half a dozen fences in their lives, should have +gone as they did. Jowdat and Ibrahim Bey at Crabbet.</p> + +<p>“<em>1st Jan.</em>, 1885.—Jowdat and Ibrahim went away to London +after I had shown Ibrahim the horses. Ibrahim is by way of being an +Arab by birth—that is to say, his family was from Moeyla on the Red +Sea, and he turns out to be no other than that Ibrahim Bey Moeylhy +who was Ismaïl’s private secretary,<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_358">[358]</span> and who was expelled from Paris by Ferry’s +Government a month ago in deference to the Sultan’s wishes. He is +an agreeable man, and extremely clever. It is arranged that we are +to have a Conference with Jemal-ed-Din at Boulogne, and they +explained to me the nature of the Franco-Russo-Indian Conspiracy, +of which Jemal-ed-Din is the head. If the Sultan does not work with +him, they say they can depose him. But he will work with them. They +want to force terms of peace on England. Otherwise they say there +will be a revolt in India. [N.B.—This Ibrahim El Moelhy, brother to +Abd-el-Salam Pasha El Moelhy, was a well-known character who +subsequently played a variety of parts in many notable intrigues +both at Yildiz and Abdin. Besides his talent in this direction—and +he used to remind me of Fakredin in Disraeli’s novel ‘Tancred’—he +was acknowledged to be the finest chess player in the East. His +pretence of being an ‘agent of the Mahdi’ had however very little +reality, Jemal-ed-Din alone having influence in that +direction.]</p> + +<p>“<em>3rd Jan.</em>—A letter from Selim Faris this morning which +disquiets me. It says that Hassan Pasha Fehmy’s mission from the +Sultan, which has been recently talked of, has for its object to +make terms with the English Government, but that it is intended to +support Tewfik, and that the only alternative is the restoration of +Ismaïl, who is patronized now by Bismarck. Jowdat has got a letter +from Halim Pasha’s son, ordering him back to Constantinople, and +warning him against mixing himself up with Irishmen or Hindus, as +such a course might compromise the Prince.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th Jan.</em>—Dined at the Club, where I had a long talk +with Marlborough, who is writing an article on<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_359">[359]</span> the evils wrought by Christianity. He is +more intellectual than his brother Randolph, but less +attractive.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th Jan.</em>—Wolseley’s column has reached Gakdul without +accident, and people are again cock-a-hoop. Leonard Courtney tells +me Gladstone is ill with anxiety about Egypt. The departure of +Hassan Fehmy’s mission from Constantinople is announced.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th Jan.</em>—Button came back last night from Tunis, +which he says the French have ruined,—trade gone, Arab peasantry +gone, caravans gone, no new colonists, old ones in despair. Passing +through Paris on his way home he had seen somebody belonging to the +Embassy (Sheffield?), who had told him that Lord Lyons was furious +at the want of policy in Egypt. He had a policy of his own which it +would seem included Arabi’s return, for Button had been asked +whether it would not be possible to get up some popular +demonstration in favour of Arabi. From what he heard at Paris the +difficulty in Egypt is that the rich people evade paying their +taxes and are forty per cent short this year, the peasantry only +five per cent. Lord Lyons’ idea is that Arabi could force the rich +to disgorge. This is exactly in harmony with Knowles’s suggestion +to me last year.</p> + +<p>“<em>12th Jan.</em>—A letter from me in the ‘Times,’ in the best +place, and a leading article upon it.” This explained my position +towards the Sultan.</p> + +<p>“Saw Button. He says the Government has decided nothing. +Gladstone does not mean to retire, or Granville, or Northbrook, or +any of them. They have no policy, except to wait on events. They +mean nothing by coquetting with the Sultan. Hassan Fehmy’s mission +will lead to nothing. They look on the Khartoum expedition as a +walk over. But my friends Ibrahim and Ismaïl are quite sure +Khartoum<span class="pagenum" id="Page_360">[360]</span> has been +taken long ago, and that the steamers at Shendy are in the Mahdi’s +hands.<a id="FNanchor_95"></a><a href="#Footnote_95" class= +"fnanchor">[95]</a></p> + +<p>“<em>15th Jan.</em>—I have dispatched a letter to the Sultan +through Halim Pasha.</p> + +<p>“<em>17th Jan.</em>—Button tells me the fate of Egypt will be +settled this week. The French counter-proposals have arrived, and +Gladstone means to clear bodily out of Egypt as well as the Soudan. +He will not hear of resigning alone, and Dilke and Hartington have +caved in. The ‘Times,’ however, does not give up its policy of +staying on in Egypt for lost, and a campaign is being organized of +defiance to Europe. ‘Dilke,’ said Button, ‘always said the only +policy was a policy of bounce, and we are going to bounce it, at a +risk of a war with France. But nobody will move a finger.’ ‘If you +want to bounce,’ I said, ‘bounce behind the Sultan, and I will go +with you.’ Certainly I do not want to see Egypt handed over to +Europe. Mr. Gladstone must remain responsible, and must do justice +before he goes. Met Wolff at the Club, who urged me to bring +forward the case now against Tewfik.</p> + +<p>“<em>18th Jan.</em>—Prepared a memorandum about Tewfik, and +tried to find Wolff to concert measures. Saw Stanley, who will put +me in communication with Hassan Fehmy. Stanley tells me Musurus +talks of Tewfik as ‘incapable but harmless.’</p> + +<p>“Lady C. tells me the Prince of Wales is now well disposed +towards me, but says I am to be attacked as soon as Parliament +meets. She does not say by whom, or for what.</p> + +<p>“<em>19th Jan.</em>—There is a telegram in the ‘Daily +Telegraph,’ explaining that Hassan Fehmy’s mission to England is to +show an autograph letter written<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_361">[361]</span> by the Czar to the Sultan, offering him an +alliance. This is what I have suspected to be Russia’s game. +Presided at a meeting of the East India Association at Exeter Hall, +the thing discussed being the age of entrance to the Civil Service. +The meeting was a small one; Stanley spoke, and Connell, and Tom +Hughes, an old twaddler of the first water.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th Jan.</em>—Button’s bouncing article is in the ‘Times.’ +He says the Government will reject the French proposals, at least +of a multiple control in Egypt.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st Jan.</em>—Called on Hassan Fehmy, and found Stanley +there. We had a long talk with the Sultan’s Envoy. Stanley +explained who I was, and gave me every help, for he is entirely +without that small jealousy which besets most men, and cares only +for ‘the cause.’ We both urged on Hassan Fehmy to be firm in his +dealing with Lord Granville, showing him in how much need the +English Government stood of the Sultan’s help, as regarded both +Egypt and India, and I promised to keep him informed of all that +goes on. He seemed pleased at finding friends, for he is quite a +stranger here, being a good Turk of the old-fashioned sort, knowing +little French and no English, and never having played before at +diplomacy. His face is most sympathetic, and I like him extremely. +He seems honest and good, but without backbone enough for our +Foreign Office rogues.</p> + +<p>“To Bowles at the ‘Vanity Fair’ Office. He advises me to stand +for Parliament, and has suggested Salford, where he says they want +a Conservative Home Rule candidate. He has been nursing the +constituency for two years, but now under the new regulations would +not get in without the Irish vote. With it he says I should +certainly be returned. It is perhaps worth thinking about.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_362">[362]</span>“<em>22nd +Jan.</em>—News of the battle of Abu Klea—Burnaby killed, as it +serves him right, for he was a mere butcher, and eight other +officers including young De Lisle. Here the bloody work begins +again. But this time the butchery will not be all on one side. They +have been pretending for the last four months that the Mahdi had no +men with him, and behold 10,000 at the first battle; that the +Western Soudanese would not fight like those of the East, and +behold the British square broken by their charge and 800 men +throwing their lives away! They must be under good discipline too, +or they would not have waited so long without attacking. Now +Stewart’s<a id="FNanchor_96"></a><a href="#Footnote_96" class= +"fnanchor">[96]</a> army will at any rate not attempt to reach +Khartoum till Wolseley comes up, and then it will be too late.</p> + +<p>“These English soldiers are mere murderers, and I confess I +would rather see them all at perdition than that a single Arab more +should die. What are they? A mongrel scum of thieves from +Whitechapel and Seven Dials, commanded by young fellows whose ideal +is the green room of the Gaiety—without beliefs, without +traditions, without other principle of action than just to get +their promotion and have a little fun. On the other side men with +the memory of a thousand years of freedom, with chivalry inherited +from the Saracens, the noblest of ancestors, with a creed the +purest the world ever knew, worshipping God and serving him in arms +like the heroes of the ancient world they are. It is over the death +of these that we rejoice. No, I desire in my heart to see their +blood avenged, and every man of Stewart’s butchering host butchered +in their turn and sent to hell. Gladstone! Great God, is there no +vengeance for this pitiful man of blood, who has not even the +courage to be at the same time a man of iron? What<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_363">[363]</span> is he that he should have cost +the world a single life? A pedant, a babbler, an impotent old +fool.</p> + +<p>“Button tells me the idea at the War Office is that Stewart will +send back his camels to Korti, and that then Wolseley will +reinforce him with 2,000 men. Omdurman, Gordon’s outpost, is taken, +and they will push on for Khartoum at all risks.</p> + +<p>“My idea is that Khartoum has fallen already, and that the whole +thing will end as it deserves in disaster.</p> + +<p>“They seem to have come to terms with the Sultan, at any rate +about the Soudan, which they will hand over to him—when they have +got it. I hope Hassan Fehmy will stand firm. He was to see Lord +Granville to-day.</p> + +<p>“Dined again at Pembridge Crescent, where John Pollen has just +returned from India. Lord Ripon seems fully to have enjoyed his +triumph and John with him. Stanley called in the evening in James +Street. He is a good friend and a good ally, and shares all my +bitter feelings against Wolseley and his cut-throats.</p> + +<p>“<em>23rd Jan.</em>—A long list of killed and wounded published, +but no more news of Stewart. Got down home to Crabbet where there +is bright sun instead of the London fog. The ‘Pall Mall’ publishes +‘from an exalted source’ (Ismaïl’s?), a fanciful programme of +Hassan Fehmy’s terms. I wish there was any chance of their being +the true ones.</p> + +<p>“I met Hardinge<a id="FNanchor_97"></a><a href="#Footnote_97" +class="fnanchor">[97]</a> yesterday at the Club, and talked with +him about Constantinople. I said that Hugh Wyndham deserved great +credit for having brought about a reconciliation between England +and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_364">[364]</span> the Sultan, but +he laughed at this. ‘Between ourselves,’ he said, ‘Wyndham had +nothing at all to do with it. He had a quarrel with the Sultan two +years ago, and has not been on speaking terms with the Palace +since.’ I said: ‘I suppose our little friend Corti managed it for +him.’ To this Hardinge did not answer. Of course it was Corti.</p> + +<p>“<em>24th Jan.</em>—There is no news from General Stewart, +except a ‘bazaar rumour’ that he is surrounded, and the British +public is beginning to get alarmed. Now we shall hear crying and +lamentation. Great God! what a stupid dull beast the world is. It +sends an army out to fight against an innocent people, and an +innocent people destroy that army. One would think that not a +single M.P. from Mr. Gladstone downwards had ever read a word of +the history of Greece or heard of Marathon. This stupidity is more +hideous even than their cruelty and lying. But if there is a God +upon the earth He will this time do justice.</p> + +<p>“The evening papers announce Hobart’s arrival in London.</p> + +<p>“<em>25th Jan.</em>—Went up to London by the early train to see +Hobart. But first I saw Button, who detailed to me the military +situation. It appears that on the 28th of last month [N.B.—There is +a confusion here as to date. The dispatch referred to is doubtless +that of 4th November] Gordon wrote to Wolseley a long dispatch, in +which he said he could not hold out more than a certain number of +days, and for this reason General Stewart’s expedition was sent. +Wolseley would have made it more numerous than it was if he could +have got transport, but he sent every camel he could lay his hands +on. The dispatch was a long one, and stated that Gordon had +steamers at a certain point, about fifteen miles above Shendy, and +proposed<span class="pagenum" id="Page_365">[365]</span> that naval +officers should be sent to man them. It particularly mentioned +Charlie Beresford as the man to take charge of them, and for this +reason the naval brigade was sent. Gordon had also written to +explain that his reason for dispatching Colonel Stewart and the +rest by river to Dongola was that he understood from Mr. Gladstone, +or rather Lord Granville’s telegram, that no expedition would under +any circumstances be sent to relieve him. All this will be +published when Parliament meets. Button thinks, all the same, that +it won’t turn out the Ministry. He said that the War Office were +expecting news hourly, and that if it did not come to-day, they +should consider things had gone wrong with Stewart. With regard to +the diplomatic position, the Government had accepted the French +proposals after all, only protesting against a Multiple Control; +and the French Government had accepted the acceptance. This is +unfortunate, as they may now think they can do without the Sultan’s +help. But our position is still an immensely strong one, and Button +promised to help all he could in the ‘Times’ if we attacked Tewfik. +Buckle is fortunately away, and Button will have things much more +in his own hands till Parliament meets. It won’t be my fault if we +don’t play trumps.</p> + +<p>“Luncheon with the Gregorys. Lady Gregory has arranged with +Stead that Layard shall be interviewed in support of the Sultan. At +the Clubs people are in a great state of excitement, waiting news +from Metemmeh which does not come. I found Godfrey Webb among +others. We went together to call on George Currie, who has just +bought the little Gothic House in Park Lane, a really charming one, +Gothic though it be, where we found Alfred Montgomery. Then to 27 +Grosvenor Street, where Hobart<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_366">[366]</span> has taken a house. With Hobart I had a long +conversation; he had seen the Sultan before he left, and the +Sultan’s idea was by hook or by crook to get a footing in Egypt. +The English Government, he said, were ready to withdraw their +troops to Alexandria and Port Said, and to admit Turkish troops to +Cairo. And the Sultan was thinking of sending a contingent to help +Wolseley in the Soudan, under the belief that half the Mahdi’s +people would lay down their arms at the command of the Caliph. I +exhorted Hobart not to let the Sultan do anything so foolish. I +know the situation, and if the Sultan were to join the English the +Sultan would become as Tewfik has become. They would pay no +attention to him, and he would lose all his influence. With the +stream he can ride on the top of the wave; against it he can only +be drowned. I urged him to get Hassan Fehmy to play a strong game +and insist as a preliminary to all assistance that Tewfik should be +deposed. He then told me in confidence that the Sultan had told him +in confidence, that he hated Tewfik, but that he considered it +politic to get a foothold in Egypt first on any terms. Hobart +thought that Hassan Fehmy would not be bold enough to depart from +this plan, or propose Tewfik being replaced. However, he would try, +and as he had a private cypher with the Sultan, he could telegraph +to him all my ideas. I asked him how I was regarded at the Palace, +and he said: ‘At first they could not understand what you were +driving at, but now they see you are a friend and accept you as +such.’</p> + +<p>“Lady C. is making an active propaganda in my favour and in +favour of my ideas. She tells me old Lucan<a id= +"FNanchor_98"></a><a href="#Footnote_98" class="fnanchor">[98]</a> +has been with her to-day, and has told her<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_367">[367]</span> that the War Office has got news that +Stewart is in fact surrounded, and he will have to capitulate. The +news is not exactly official, but they seem to believe it.</p> + +<p>“<em>26th Jan.</em>—To see Button. He says the acceptance of the +French proposals has stopped the negotiations for the present with +the Sultan, but they will come on again, and he strongly advises +that Hassan Fehmy should declare himself against Tewfik, and +promises that if he does the ‘Times’ will bring the matter forward. +Buckle is away on his honeymoon till the 19th February, and Button +will have things pretty much his own way in Printing House Square, +so I have drawn up a memorandum for Hassan Fehmy of the language he +should use, and shall try and get him to send in a dispatch to Lord +Granville without delay.</p> + +<p>“<em>27th Jan.</em>—Stanley came to me in the morning, and +highly approves my draft memorandum, and we went together to call +on Hassan Fehmy, but he was out, and I have left the memorandum +with Stanley to read to him. Lady A. sent a message by him to say +she wished to see me, and I had luncheon at her house in Grosvenor +Street. She is very anxious about her son, who is with General +Stewart, but I had little to say to comfort her. She would +naturally, she told me, sympathize with the Arabs, and her son, +too, had sympathized with them after the Suakin campaign. But such +is the desire of military glory he had volunteered nevertheless. I +also saw Pembroke yesterday, who has grown a beard, and is looking +twice the man he was. He, too, is in a state of anxiety, for Reggie +Talbot and Heale Phipps, both members of the Wilton Club, are with +Stewart. Such are the glories of war.</p> + +<p>“<em>28th Jan.</em>—The evening papers announce<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_368">[368]</span> Stewart’s arrival at last at +Metemmeh after more slaughter, another hundred men or so killed and +wounded on the English side, and two thousand they say on the side +of the Arabs. This is infinitely disgusting, and the only thing +which seems to mitigate the evil is, that being now in +communication with Gordon by steamer they may be willing to rescue +him, and retire as they said it was their intention to do. They can +perfectly well do this by river, without any more battles, and the +Mahdi has still a large army on the river bank, between Metemmeh +and Khartoum. The Arbitration Association have elected me to their +executive Committee, and have called a meeting for to-morrow.</p> + +<p>“<em>29th Jan.</em>—Had a long talk with Ibrahim Bey. I asked +what could be done in the way of getting up a demonstration in +Egypt against Tewfik. He said petitions might be addressed to the +British Government asking for his deposition. The Ulema of the +Azhar would sign it, except El Abbasi, the Sheykh el Islam, who is +Tewfik’s creature. Some of the Notables might and a number of +village Sheykhs, but not the Mudirs, as these are Government +officials paid by Tewfik. If the English Government would give the +least encouragement every man in Egypt would sign it. As to Arabi, +he said all the poor are for him, but the rich won’t hear of him. +He urged me to go to Paris and talk things over with +Jemal-ed-Din.</p> + +<p>“Hobart, Whittaker tells me, has just been staying at +Sandringham. The Prince of Wales said to him: ‘I suppose we shall +have to get rid of Tewfik.’ Hobart’s instructions from the Sultan +are nothing but a programme of conciliatory language, and +compliments to the Queen and Prince of Wales. He is only here to +advise Hassan Fehmy. Hassan Fehmy’s<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_369">[369]</span> audience at Osborne was not a success. The +Queen would not talk on important matters, and was not particularly +gracious. I am afraid his mission will lead to nothing. His only +chance was to speak out loudly and firmly, and insist on Tewfik’s +deposition. I have got the peace people to vote a resolution urging +Gladstone to retire from Khartoum, and make peace with the Mahdi. I +drafted a letter for them to Gladstone.</p> + +<p>“<em>30th Jan.</em>—Bowles has published my caricature in +‘Vanity Fair.’ Saw Brett with Button, he and his master, +Hartington, are all for smashing the Mahdi and keeping Khartoum and +Eastern Soudan. If I wanted evacuation he advised me to send in a +memorandum to Chamberlain who has just been declaring that the +Soudan is to be handed over ‘to its own noble savages.’ Brett is a +clever, but unprincipled<a id="FNanchor_99"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_99" class="fnanchor">[99]</a> young man, and manages all +Hartington’s intrigues for him with the press. Button and Stead are +the two he works through most, and their latest achievement has +been getting Temple, who married Hartington’s first cousin +(Lascelles’ sister) made Bishop of London. The ‘Pall Mall’ has been +urging it for the last three weeks, and now it is done. The stupid +public fancies that Stead is a wonderful prophet, when he insists +on this and that policy, and when the policy is adopted. But +Hartington pulls all the strings and gives him the information, and +so the campaign against the Grand Old Man goes on. I am not sure +whether Dilke is still in with them, but I fancy he is. Chamberlain +has broken away. Brett, though of course an enemy to my ideas, +sometimes<span class="pagenum" id="Page_370">[370]</span> gives +useful hints. I asked him to-day what they were going to do in +Lower Egypt. He said: ‘You are going to have English +Administration.’</p> + +<p>“<em>1st Feb.</em>—Dined with George Currie in Park Lane; Alfred +Seymour was there, and Newton, the Police magistrate, also Walter +Seymour, who is just starting on another venture to Venezuela, this +time with a cargo of arms to make a revolution. Alfred Seymour has +a story of Sir Peter Lumsden having resigned his mission in +Afghanistan rather than carry out the Government’s concessions on +the frontier.</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd Feb.</em>—Wrote the draft of a letter to Chamberlain, +urging an immediate evacuation of Khartoum, but shall keep it till +Wilson returns from Metemmeh with news of Gordon.</p> + +<p>“Old Lord Mark Kerr<a id="FNanchor_100"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_100" class="fnanchor">[100]</a> called in the morning, +‘out of neighbourly feeling’ he said, as he lives almost next door +(in James Street). I had correspondence with him two years ago +about Arabi.</p> + +<p>“Lunched with Button. He has told me more particulars of the +Hartington intrigue. He says that not only was Gordon sent to +Khartoum without a Cabinet Council, but Wolseley also was sent +without one. The whole expedition has been an executive measure, +which not all the members of the Cabinet have ever agreed to. +Similarly the financial proposals for Egypt have never been agreed +to by Lord Northbrook, and the Cabinet has been going on in this +way for a year, each minister running his own hare. Now, however, +Chamberlain will break off and leave the rest, hoping to come in on +the top of the wave with the new elections.</p> + +<p>“Letters have come from India showing that Randolph, thanks to +my letters, has been well received, and there is one I am specially +glad to get<span class="pagenum" id="Page_371">[371]</span> from +Seyd Huseyn at Hyderabad.<a id="FNanchor_101"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_101" class="fnanchor">[101]</a> Salar Jung has invited +Randolph, and he has accepted the invitation.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th Feb.</em>—Button says there are great things brewing +all over Europe. The French Government, although it promised an +answer on the Egyptian finance question last Wednesday, has +remained silent. There is a hitch somewhere in the negotiations. +There is a row between Germany and Russia on account of the King of +Bulgaria’s proposed marriage. The Portuguese have seized both banks +of the Congo, being in league with France, etc. Bismarck is furious +because the Congo Conference seems likely to break up as the London +one did. If we have any luck, there may be a good general European +war all round.</p> + +<p>“Dinner at Lady C.’s, who is anxious I should go into Parliament +as a follower of Churchill’s. She says the Prince of Wales is angry +with me because I only care about the Arabs in this infernal war. +Afterwards to a party at Lady Stanley of Alderley’s (Lord Stanley’s +mother), where I had some talk with Frederic Harrison, and hope to +get him to take part in a peace meeting. Lady Stanley talked about +the war, as to which they are all very cock-a-hoop now. They can’t +take any interest, they say, in the Arabs, because there are so +many of them; when a thousand are killed, there are always +thousands more to take their place. Dilke was there.</p> + +<p>“<em>5th Feb.</em>—Went to see Lord Mark Kerr, whom I found at +breakfast, walking uneasily round, and eating a mouthful from time +to time. He is a good, excellent man, but vague in his ideas to the +verge of insanity. His instincts are admirable, and he has +glimmerings of great thoughts about the East. He<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_372">[372]</span> sympathizes with the Arabs as +he does with the Indian natives, and is very angry just now at the +Duke of Connaught being recalled from India instead of being made +Commander-in-Chief. ‘The Duke is not clever,’ he said, ‘but he +understands how to talk to a gentleman in the East—and they should +have made him Commander-in-Chief.’ Lord Mark will help us at any +meeting we may get up.</p> + +<p>“Then to see Stanley, who urges me to call again on Hassan Fehmy +and on Staal, the Russian Ambassador, who wants to see me. He, too, +will help. On my return I found Mark Napier, who announced the +unexpected and glorious news of the fall of Khartoum. This turns +all our plans topsy-turvy, but to our great advantage, and I rushed +off at once to see Hassan Fehmy, and had the pleasure of being the +first to give him the news. There was another Englishman with him +when I arrived, and the Ambassador put on a <em>figure de +circonstance</em> when he heard what had happened. But as soon as +the Englishman was gone he took me by both hands, and a smile of +pleasure broke out over all his face. He promised me to have +nothing to do with ideas of helping with Turkish troops against the +Mahdi, and seemed quite disposed to follow all my advice. I left +him to seek Button, and fortunately found him just come from the +War Office. It seems that Wilson<a id="FNanchor_102"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_102" class="fnanchor">[102]</a> was delayed by the +shallowness of the river, and took four days getting up to Khartoum +from Metemmeh. On arrival he found the citadel dismantled, no flag +flying, and the whole place full of Arabs, who opened fire on him, +and then he turned tail, and by another accident all three steamers +ran aground, and there they still are, Wilson planted on an island, +and the news brought<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_373">[373]</span> in a boat, as I understand, by +Stuart-Wortley. Button says that Stewart’s force at Metemmeh runs +no risk, as it has abundance of provisions, but I can’t believe +this. In any case the expedition has come altogether to grief, and +the outside of what there is to hope Button says, is that Stewart +can be relieved, and the British Forces concentrated for the summer +at Metemmeh. There is no question of an advance now on Khartoum. It +is unknown what has become of Gordon. Indeed, the whole thing is +conjecture, as Wilson did not land. Button tells me that the +Rothschilds got a telegram this morning from their agents saying +that there was no truth at all in the story. But this cannot be, as +Button has seen Wolseley’s dispatches at the War Office.</p> + +<p>“Lunched with Mark Napier at St. James’s Club, and have agreed +to take him with me if I am sent to make peace with the Mahdi. This +seems not altogether impossible. I met Austin Lee<a id= +"FNanchor_103"></a><a href="#Footnote_103" class= +"fnanchor">[103]</a> and reminded him how I had told him they would +have to come to me after all. Also Philip Currie sent me a note in +the afternoon asking me to dinner for Saturday, a thing he has not +done for long. I had just time to run in and see Lady Gregory that +we might rejoice together, and then I was interviewed by Wheeler +for the Press Association, and got away by train home to Crabbet +where young Hardinge has come down to hunt. This has been a day of +consolation, and I could not help singing all the way down in the +train. Why had I so little faith?</p> + +<p>“<em>6th Feb.</em>—A beautiful morning, and we went down to +Shoreham, had a capital run of six miles quite straight over the +Downs without a check, and<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_374">[374]</span> killed in Newtimber Holt. Hardinge was with +us, riding Proximo, and went all the way close behind the hounds. +Harry Brand was out, and we had a long talk about the Soudan. He +says the Government are all for going on with the war. He himself +had been in favour of sending me out to make peace. But the country +would never stand anything now but war. I told him, if he had any +influence with the Cabinet, to use it for the recall of Wolseley’s +expedition, which would certainly suffer great loss if it stayed. I +am strongly of the opinion that Gordon is alive, and equally of +opinion that Wolseley is the worst man in the world to negotiate +for him if he is a prisoner.</p> + +<p>“Had a good deal of talk in the evening with Hardinge. He agreed +with me that Dufferin was too fond of humbugging people to succeed +in the East. He had been very idle, too, at Constantinople, leaving +all the work of the Embassy to Wyndham. The Turks, however, were +afraid of him, and he had got a good deal out of them in the way of +claims and such like, though his main policy had failed. Dufferin +was sore about Egypt, where he considered himself to have been a +failure. He thought he could have carried out his programme if he +had been left at Cairo longer. Wyndham had quarrelled with the +Sultan by accusing him of intriguing in Egypt. He had done this in +a fit of temper, but the Sultan never forgave. Hardinge knew all +about how Dilke had worked up the Egyptian war, and of the dirt +Malet had been made to eat. He has a poor opinion of Baring.</p> + +<p>“<em>7th Feb.</em>—To London early and saw Hassan Fehmy, whom I +found in a state of entire perplexity to know what to do. I +therefore had no difficulty in persuading him to write a formal +dispatch to Lord<span class="pagenum" id="Page_375">[375]</span> +Granville, protesting against what was going on in Egypt and +Soudan. He asked me to write the draft for him, and I promised to +do so. He gave me a long account of all that he had said to Lord +Granville, which seems to have been very little to the point. A +more hopelessly muddled old gentleman I think I never met, honest +though and anxious to do his duty, which is far better than to be a +clever rogue. However, we will remedy it all by a dispatch that +will make old Granville rub his eyes. Button is of opinion that +Wolseley will not be at all anxious to carry on the campaign at a +great expense, but will rather be for negotiating. His only idea in +this direction is to offer money. Harry reproached me yesterday +with having gone over to the Sultan, but I said: ‘If your hounds +change their fox what is the huntsman to do? Is he to go on by +himself or to go with them?’ Down in the afternoon to Wilbury, a +day of wind and rain. Percy Wyndham is staunch in opposition to the +war. Wrote the draft dispatch for Hassan Fehmy.</p> + +<p>“<em>9th Feb.</em>—At Wilbury. Hunting from Elbarrow, I enjoyed +the day more than any this season.</p> + +<p>“<em>10th Feb.</em>—Button telegraphed to me last night to come +to London as there was something important going on in connection +with Hassan Fehmy’s mission, so I went up. He has seen Brett who +tells him some new and unexpected departure is about to be taken +with regard to Egypt. The Sultan’s mission is once more in favour. +But it may mean many things. The Sultan ought to offer mediation in +the Soudan. Lunched with Lady Gregory, and in the afternoon went +with Stanley to take part in the Indian Reform Association’s +deputation to Lord Ripon. After it was over Stanley and I had a +private talk with Lord Ripon, and we begged him to expostulate with +the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_376">[376]</span> Government +against sending Indian troops to the Soudan. He said he would +certainly use any influence he had in that direction, but assured +us it was not necessary, as no troops would be sent. Nevertheless +it is announced to-night in all the papers.</p> + +<p>“Dined with Button at the Marlborough Club. It is announced that +Gordon is certainly dead, and there are sensational accounts of the +sack of Khartoum. I am inclined to think it just as well, in the +cause of peace, that the worst should have happened. It will take +away the excuse of a further advance. Button says they all mean war +to the knife, but I am convinced that in six weeks Gordon will be +forgotten, and there will be a strong reaction against the war; +then the Government will slip out of it. If Gordon was alive and a +prisoner, then the excitement would be kept up till he was +released.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th Feb.</em>—George Wyndham is ordered with the Guards to +Suakin, and I have asked Jemal-ed-Din to give him a talisman in +case of his being taken prisoner by the Mahdi. But it is on +condition that he does not use it for any <em>ruse de +guerre</em>.</p> + +<p>“Saw Hassan Fehmy, who described to me a visit he paid yesterday +to Gladstone. Mr. Gladstone had been most charming, but had not, it +seems, committed himself to anything definite. He, the Pasha, was +very angry about the Italian occupation of Massowa, but I could not +get out of him exactly what proposals he had made on the Sultan’s +behalf. Button declares that it was arranged positively three weeks +ago that Turkish troops should occupy Cairo, but the acceptance by +France of the financial proposals stopped this. Now, however, he +tells me, as a great secret, that the proposals have again broken +down. And that is the reason why they are anxious again to arrange +matters with the Sultan. Hassan<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_377">[377]</span> Fehmy was very cordial, and promised to +come down to Crabbet as soon as these worries are off his hands. I +gave him my draft of his dispatch to Lord Granville which Stanley +had translated into French, but it was written on Sunday when we +thought still that no arrangement could be come to with the Foreign +Office. He said, however, that he would keep it to use in case the +present negotiations broke down. Speaking of Ismaïl Pasha, he said +I might trust him not to compromise himself in that direction, that +the Sultan knew very well that Ismaïl was his worst enemy.</p> + +<p>“<em>12th Feb.</em>—Down again to Wilbury, another day’s hunting +from Vernham Gate, and had a hard run of an hour across very steep +hills, and killed in a wood. Kars carried me well, and I was again +in front all the way.</p> + +<p>“There is news of another bloody battle in the Soudan. General +Earle killed this time. Morley and Courtney have come out well in +favour of peace, and I am sure the Government will not be allowed +to go on with this butchery. To-night’s ‘Pall Mall’ has an article +strongly for Ismaïl.</p> + +<p>“<em>14th Feb.</em>—Hunted in Savernake Forest.</p> + +<p>“<em>15th Feb.</em>—Wilbury. Major Poore, an old disciple of +Urquhart’s, called, and I had some interesting conversation with +him. Urquhart doubtless was the founder of a remarkable school of +political morality, but his eccentricities injured its effect, and +much of his practical teaching is now old-fashioned.</p> + +<p>“<em>17th Feb.</em>—To London early. I find everybody very angry +with Gladstone for having been to the play the very night the news +of Gordon’s death was received, and I hear that he was hissed in +St. James’s Street.</p> + +<p>“To Lymington’s wedding with Miss Pease, the<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_378">[378]</span> Quaker heiress. We may hope +soon to get the Quakers on the side of peace. Hitherto they have +been dead against it.</p> + +<p>“Talked with Hobart Pasha at his Club, the Army and Navy. He saw +Gladstone yesterday, who told him that he had never had any +ill-feeling towards the Turks, indeed had rather liked them than +otherwise. Harcourt told him that the Government knew that the +Sultan’s only wish was to restore Ismaïl.<a id= +"FNanchor_104"></a><a href="#Footnote_104" class= +"fnanchor">[104]</a> As to this Hobart expressed to me his great +anger. They have had nothing to do with Ismaïl, who has spoiled +Hassan Fehmy’s mission.</p> + +<p>“<em>18th Feb.</em>—Button is very anxious to find out what is +in the air. I went accordingly to Hassan Fehmy, and had a few words +with him—but he is a hopeless man. Lord Granville complains of him +that he, Hassan, understands nothing that he says, and that he, +Lord Granville, understands very little of what Hassan says. I can +well believe it. He seemed vexed at being questioned about +Ismaïl.</p> + +<p>“Dined with Mrs. S., where Philip Currie was. His special +business now at the Foreign Office is the Afghan frontier. This he +flattered himself he knew thoroughly. ‘The Russians,’ he said, +‘have the strongest hand, but we hold half a dozen good cards which +we may play well.’ It will take better playing than he gave his +cards in Egypt to prevent a war.</p> + +<p>“<em>19th Feb.</em>—Looked in at Gregory’s. He is writing a plea +for Arabi’s recall to Egypt in the ‘Nineteenth Century.’ It is +generally admitted now in the light of the Soudan rebellion that +the Egyptian war was<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_379">[379]</span> a mistake, and Arabi an honest man. Jem +Lowther, whom I met to-day, says the Opposition have decided on a +Vote of Censure, and the declaration of an alternative policy in +Egypt. It must be either Arabi or annexation. He said he himself +was for annexation. There is a sensational account in the ‘Pall +Mall’ of a retreat from Metemmeh and the recall of Wolseley. I hope +Buller will get his force back without fighting, as defeat might +now injure the cause of peace. People are much agitated about this +at the Carlton, among others Pembroke. While at a meeting of the +Peace Committee we heard Gladstone hooted on his way to +Westminster. Parliament met to-day, and it must have been a gloomy +business for the Grand Old Man to announce his policy of blood, +especially as it will mean a policy of defeat. General Stewart is +dead of his wounds.</p> + +<p>“Labouchere sent word to say he wanted to know Ismaïl Jowdat’s +address, and I called on him to-day. He tells me Herbert Gladstone +has been at him to try and find out a way of communicating with the +Mahdi. We had a long talk on the subject. Herbert Gladstone is used +by his father as a go-between, and communicates with the Irish +through Labouchere. Labouchere assures me that many Parliamentary +arrangements have in this way been made up between the Grand Old +Man and Mr. Parnell. And he says it is delicious to hear Mr. +Gladstone afterwards denying them in the House of Commons. I +promised him to put the Government in communication with the +Mahdi’s agents whenever they like.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th Feb.</em>—Labouchere writes that he has seen Herbert +Gladstone again, and wants me to advise the Mahdi to constitute +some one his regular agent by sending him credentials. I had +already thought of doing this, and I had another long talk with +him<span class="pagenum" id="Page_380">[380]</span> about it. The +essential, he says, is that the thing should not be known, as the +Government could never carry a proposal through the House to employ +me in treating. But all the same they would like to treat, and we +agreed that the base of negotiation might be the complete +evacuation of the Soudan by the English and Egyptians, and a +restoration of the Wady Halfa frontier. Suakin might be given to +the Sultan, and in any case must be evacuated by us. On this basis +a peace or truce might be effected and Wolseley’s troops withdrawn. +Labouchere was very amusing about the various little intrigues he +had helped to carry on for Mr. Gladstone, and I hope this one may +succeed as well as the others. He says that on one occasion +Gladstone got his own side to vote against him.</p> + +<p>“Lady Gregory has told me the whole of her husband’s +conversation with Mr. Gladstone (which he had not told me). It was +after dinner on Tuesday. Mr. Gladstone insisted on talking to Sir +William in spite of friends who tried to interrupt. He began by +asking him what he would do, and Gregory said he would certainly +not go to Khartoum. To this Mr. Gladstone replied: ‘Oh, I think, +from all the information in our possession, that the taking of +Khartoum will not be a very difficult matter.’ ‘The difficulty you +think,’ said Sir William, ‘will be after?’ ‘Ah, yes,’ said Mr. +Gladstone, ‘a twenty times greater difficulty. If I only knew what +was then to be done my mind would be easy.’ He then asked Sir +William whether he thought it would be possible to treat with the +Mahdi. ‘How can we approach such a man? Through what channel and on +what terms?’ ‘There is,’ said Sir William, ‘but one man who could +help you there.’ ‘And who is that? You don’t mean Blunt?’ ‘No,’ +said Sir William, ‘not<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_381">[381]</span> Blunt. I am thinking of Arabi.’ ‘Ah,’ said +Mr. Gladstone, ‘that is a point on which you and I differ. You +think Arabi an honest man. I think him a <em>consummate +blackguard</em>. Why, I have had in my hands letters signed by that +man in which he offers to barter the liberties of his country to +the Sultan!’ Sir William asked him at what date these had been +written, and Mr. Gladstone said about three weeks before the +bombardment of Alexandria. ‘At that time,’ said Sir William, ‘I +suppose all the Egyptians had been driven into the Sultan’s arms. I +do not alter my opinion of him, which is what it has always been, +that he is an honest man and a patriot.’ ‘Ah,’ said Mr. Gladstone, +‘what would I not give to believe it with you! If I could only +believe him honest <em>I would jump at him</em>.’ This we think +rather hopeful, but I fear the old man’s pride will be too strong +for him.</p> + +<p>“Ibrahim Bey called again, and I told him I thought it better he +should not come back to James Street for the present, as it might +compromise us, that the Government were in a fair way to treat and +that it would not do to frighten them. He expressed his willingness +to go to Suakin on a mission if required; and perhaps some day we +may use him in this way.</p> + +<p>“M. Taschaud, a Belgian dignitary, called. He is the promoter of +arbitration and peace abroad, and especially I fancy of his own +glory. He is the author of a pamphlet called the ‘Future of Egypt, +by an ex-plenipotentiary,’ and seems to know people about. He +assured me that he had written this pamphlet as an article for the +‘Fortnightly,’ but that after it was in print Escott had +substituted for it the famous article signed ‘G.’ This, M. Taschaud +says, was certainly written with Mr. Gladstone’s consent, though +not by himself. His ideas of Egypt I do not<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_382">[382]</span> share, as they seem to consist of +internationalizing it for the profit of Europe.</p> + +<p>“Stanley writes that he has seen Hassan Fehmy, and that it is +all right about the ex-Khedive Ismaïl. So I am satisfied. But I am +glad all the same that they are not thinking now of employing the +Sultan to mediate in the Soudan. He would only make a mess of it. +Lunched at the Carlton. Dined at St. James’s Club with Walter +Seymour. Saw Eddy Hamilton looking pale and harassed. He +acknowledged himself pretty near dead beat. I said: ‘When Wolseley +is a prisoner, you will know where to find me.’</p> + +<p>“<em>21st Feb.</em>—Nebbi Ullah<a id="FNanchor_105"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_105" class="fnanchor">[105]</a> called and I urged him +to come to the Soudan Conference and protest against the employment +of Indian troops against the Mahdi. He promised to do so and to get +others to speak among the Indians now in London. I think that will +have a good effect. After this came one Johnstone, who is getting +up a large meeting in St. James’s Hall for the week after next, and +who has asked me to preside. He represents himself as having +command of the working men’s association, and says he can get +together a good number of popular working men speakers. I have +promised to preside as he wishes, and it certainly can do no harm, +especially as the meeting is to ask for Arabi’s recall to Egypt as +well as for an abandonment of the Soudan campaign.</p> + +<p>“Then Drummond Wolff called, who wants materials for his speech +on the Vote of Censure. I gave him the text of my letter to +Gladstone of last April proposing to mediate in the Soudan; and +urged him strongly to get the Fourth Party to take up the cause of +peace. It was sure to be the winning cause.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_383">[383]</span>“After him John +Morley, who came for the same purpose and stopped to luncheon. He +wanted particularly an argument against the Slave Trade cry, and to +know whether the Mahdi could be induced to treat on a civilized +basis. He told me that Dilke had told him yesterday that Mr. +Gladstone’s speech on Monday in answer to the motion of censure +would be pitched in quite a different key and far more peaceable. +He, Morley, is to follow immediately after Northcote, and then Mr. +Gladstone will reply to both. It is all very well Morley coming +forward now as the champion of peace, but it was his defection from +Frederic Harrison and me last year that decided the Government to +send the expedition. If he had spoken out then as he does now, he +would have prevented it. But he wished to please his constituents +at Newcastle with whom the legend of the Grand Old Man still +survives. I did not, however, reproach him with the past, as it +would have done no good.</p> + +<p>“At the Carlton I coached a third M.P., Robert Bourke, who seems +coming round now to Arabi. I should not be surprised if the +Conservatives took him up after all.</p> + +<p>“Then I called on Cardinal Manning and sat with him an hour in +his private room in which he certainly looks very much in +character. It is a large room, but he has made it habitable with a +tall screen lined with bookcases running round the fire, and +ensconced in which he sits. I never saw him looking better, and +complimented him on the effect of his abstinence. This pleased him. +I wanted him to take an active part in favour of peace, but he +would not do this, as he said he was forbidden by his rulers to +take part in politics. But he sympathizes much with my views, as he +has always done, though not very<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_384">[384]</span> understandingly. Talking of the English +Catholic Laity, he said they were hopelessly dull—most of them—very +old-fashioned Conservatives, and he did not think I should get much +support out of them. The Irish, of course, supported me, but that +was out of hatred to England—and it would not advance my cause. +Cardinal Manning is a link for me with the extreme past, for I have +known him nearly forty years, and I think it is a pleasure for him +to see me for the same reason. He leads a very lonely life, out of +harmony with those about him, and clinging to old recollections. He +talked warmly about old Sussex days and the kindly relations +existing there between all classes. He is very hopeless about +England’s prospects, and indeed the news to-day is enough to make +Englishmen gloomy, for Buller and his force seem surrounded at Abu +Klea, and it may well be that even Wolseley may have to capitulate +before the summer is over.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd Feb.</em>—The ‘Sunday Times’ has a sensational +‘victory’ at Abu Klea, but it is evidently not worth much, as +Buller is still tied by the leg—‘want of camels.’ This is just what +will make all these campaigns impotent. Then, being unable to move, +they will run short of provisions, and then the hot weather will +come. They will be ‘hemmed in’ by the Arabs, and unless they make +peace will have to capitulate. Button tells me the Government are +ready to treat with the Mahdi on almost any terms he could ask, and +advises me to go to Paris and start negotiations there. I shall go, +but must first hear the opening of the Debate of Censure. With +regard to that, Button tells me some of the Cabinet are very +anxious to get beaten. Chamberlain told a friend of his last night +that he would far rather go to the country and explain peace than +have to explain war.<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_385">[385]</span> If Morley would only accept Mr. Gladstone’s +speech on Monday as a peace speech and withdraw his motion, many of +the Whigs would go over to the Tories and turn the Government out. +I have written an article on Hassan Fehmy’s mission for Button for +the ‘Times,’ and I took it to him to-day. It is against my rule to +do this, as I have only once written an unsigned thing for them, +namely, the article on the Palmer expedition. But this is an +exceptional case. Button says the Conservatives are all talking now +of Arabi and are half disposed to take him up. They would certainly +make terms with the Sultan if they came into office.</p> + +<p>“Ferid Bey, the First Secretary of the Turkish Embassy, called. +He is very much against the Mahdi, and believes that but for him +the English would long ago have left Egypt. I did my best to +persuade him to take a broad view, and suggested that if they +wanted to treat with Lord Granville effectively they should mass +20,000 men at Gaza.</p> + +<p>“To Crabbet by late train.</p> + +<p>“<em>23rd Feb.</em>—Wrote to Morley repeating what Button had +suggested about his withdrawing his amendment, so as to turn the +Government out and have a good honest opposition to the war, and +also about Ibrahim Bey’s statement published on Thursday. Beta, who +I hear is Morier, mentions it and challenges me to say whether it +is authentic, and I have begged Morley to say from me that it is +so.</p> + +<p>“We hunted with the Crawley and Horsham hounds from Patching, +and had a pretty run across the down to Steyning, whence we came +home, Kars having cut his fetlock with a flint.</p> + +<p>“Up to town in the evening and dined at Lady C.’s. She says all +her friends now are speaking well of<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_386">[386]</span> me. Met Henry Chaplin at the Carlton, who +thinks Wolseley’s army is lost.</p> + +<p>“<em>24th Feb.</em>—To Button early. He tells me Philip Currie, +with whom he talked, is anxious to get into communication with the +Mahdi, but of course not through me or anybody who can really help +him. The Censure Debate came on last night, and, though Mr. +Gladstone was not of course outspoken, his speech was nevertheless +distinctly more peaceable than the first. It seems, however, to +have been a miserable exhibition of the old hair-splitting +arguments, like all the rest he has made on the Egyptian business. +I cannot understand his reputation as an orator. He certainly has +an extreme facility and power of statement, but he neither touches +nor convinces. It is a lawyer’s eloquence, not a statesman’s—at +least this is the impression his speeches have always made on me. +Button thinks nevertheless he will get his majority, but that the +Government will go to pieces on some smaller issue during the +Session.</p> + +<p>“Called on Stanley to tell him something of my plans, and then +went by the tidal train to Paris.</p> + +<p>“<em>25th Feb.</em>—At the Hotel Wagram. Sanua called last night +and we talked affairs over, and this morning I had two hours with +Jemal-ed-Din. I find there will be more difficulty in treating with +the Mahdi now than I thought, or than would have been the case last +year, for the taking of Khartoum has altered the situation +considerably. Also they are much elated at having killed five +English generals, a thing never heard of, they say, in any war. +These they count to be Hicks, Baker, Stewart, Earle, and now +Gordon—and the Mahdi’s terms will be correspondingly high. Still, +Jemal-ed-Din says distinctly that peace can be made if the English +are willing,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_387">[387]</span> +<em>first</em>, to abandon the Soudan, <em>second</em>, to hand +over Suakin to the Sultan, <em>third</em>, to use their good +offices to get the Italians out of Massowa, and <em>fourth</em>, to +arrange with the Sultan for the establishment of Mohammedan +Government in Egypt. The recall of Arabi would much facilitate +matters, but any popular Government in Egypt could be on friendly +terms with Mohammed Ahmed. With regard to the method of treating, +Jemal-ed-Din says it is essential that the English Government +should make the first move. The Mahdi could not under present +circumstances send an Embassy to England, or even appoint him +(Jemal-ed-Din) his <em>wakil</em> for that purpose. The Embassy +must be sent by England, and all he can do is to forward it to its +destination and recommend it as a <em>bona fide</em> mission. I +asked him about Gordon’s bible, which Mrs. Allnatt has been very +anxious I should try and get back; but Jemal-ed-Din declines to +hold out hopes of its restoration until peace is made. I begged +him, however, to try to obtain it, as if he succeeded it would be a +great proof to our Government of his power. There was an article on +Jemal-ed-Din in yesterday’s ‘Times,’ which is correct as far as it +goes, but Jemal-ed-Din is angry at their having left out all that +he said against Ismaïl Pasha and Prince Hassan’s appointment to the +Soudan.</p> + +<p>“Had a long talk at the Embassy with Bungo Herbert<a id= +"FNanchor_106"></a><a href="#Footnote_106" class= +"fnanchor">[106]</a> on the Mahdi question, but I don’t know that +it will do any good, as Lord Lyons they say has left off expressing +any opinion on Egyptian affairs, as his advice has never been +taken. Herbert is his private secretary now, Sheffield being +away.</p> + +<p>“<em>26th Feb.</em>—Jemal-ed-Din and Sanua to +breakfast.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_388">[388]</span> I read +them my letter to the Sultan, which they highly approve of. About +Afghanistan, Jemal-ed-Din assured me that the talk of a quarrel +between Russia and the Amir was all nonsense; that the quarrel, +whenever it came off, would be against us; that the Amir would give +free passage to Russia for the invasion of India, but neither were +ready yet for this.</p> + +<p>“There is a telegram in the papers that the Nizam has offered +troops for the Soudan, and at this, too, he laughed. He said they +always offered troops, as they knew they would not be accepted. +When Sanua was gone he told me privately that he had thought over +my proposals of negotiations with the Mahdi, and was sure it could +be done. But he would have nothing to do with it unless the English +Government would show its sincerity by employing me or someone else +he could trust to represent them. Then he would introduce the +mission, which must also be accompanied by a Mohammedan, to a man +of high station in Egypt who was in a position to speak as to +terms. He himself was not in such position, and he could do no more +than indicate the way to others who would give the necessary +introductions and safe-conducts to the English agent. It must, +however, be distinctly arranged beforehand that the English +Government should engage itself to protect the persons through +whose agency the negotiations should be carried on. They must not +be allowed to suffer at the hands of the Khedive. He was of opinion +that not only a peace might be made, but also a treaty of commerce, +and perhaps even a slave trade convention—the latter to the extent +of guaranteeing the Abyssinians from slave raids inasmuch as these +were illegal. He declined, however, to enter into communication +with any English official on the subject until I should be first +convinced that their<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_389">[389]</span> intentions were serious, and that the +protection was guaranteed to the Mahdi’s <em>wakils</em>. I am well +satisfied with this view of the case, and all the more so from +finding Jemal-ed-Din so cautious in his promises. He does not think +it would be judicious to apply for Gordon’s bible just now.</p> + +<p>“Gladstone to-day recants his declaration of abandoning the +Soudan. But all this debate is selling the bear’s skin before it is +killed. My opinion is that the Berber railroad will never be made, +except perhaps a few miles of it, and that as soon as the Nile +rises Wolseley will run for it down the river to Egypt.</p> + +<p>“<em>27th Feb.</em>—Hassan Fehmy’s mission it seems is to be +recalled, the fall of Khartoum having altered the situation. Prince +Halim writes again, but this time not about politics, asking me to +get him a pair of horses for the Sultan to drive. In his letter the +other day he mentions having delivered my letter to His Majesty. +The horses must be above all things ‘very quiet,’ as the Sultan +wishes to drive them himself.</p> + +<p>“Saw Lady Gregory, and had breakfast at the Blounts.<a id= +"FNanchor_107"></a><a href="#Footnote_107" class= +"fnanchor">[107]</a> Afterwards to call on Lesseps, but he was not +at home. Then to the Embassy, where I found Walsham, Herbert, +Leigh, and another, and talked nonsense with them for an hour in +the Chancery as in old days—also old Atlee, a relic of the past. +Malet is dining to-night at the Embassy. I am dining with the +Wagrams.</p> + +<p>“<em>28th Feb.</em>—Came over to London by the tidal train and +went at once to see Button. The Government have escaped the Vote of +Censure again by the skin of their teeth—a majority of fourteen +only. Button was in the House to the end, and he says the Old Man +was quite overcome when the result was<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_390">[390]</span> announced. This is the only thing in the +world that can make him feel. The most hideous failure abroad, war +with every nation, India in revolt, the Empire breaking up, the +colonies lost—all these things could not touch him or make him +sleep a wink less sound. But an adverse vote in the House—that was +a very much more serious thing. It is a defeat he is able to +understand. It will be the end of him, though Button thinks he will +not immediately resign. The debate, he says, was in its latter part +of a high order. The first two days the Opposition made nothing of +it, and Northcote was miserably weak, and John Morley a mere +opportunist, but Goschen’s speech was the turning point, and from +that point it was brilliant. By far the best defence, curious to +say, of the Government was made by Lord Derby in the House of +Lords. It was Harcourt who did most damage to them, as he was put +up on Thursday to explain their explanations, and did so entirely +on peace principles. But this was probably arranged, as Dilke and +Hartington followed suit. The great question is—will they resign? +We discussed the probabilities of a new Cabinet, and agreed that +Lytton ought to have a seat at one of the administrative +departments. Button says public opinion would hardly stand him at +the Foreign Office or India Office, though I am of opinion that for +the former he is just the man. Churchill will have the India +Office, he says; possibly Hicks Beach the Foreign Office; Lytton +more likely the Admiralty. But I rather doubt his taking office at +all. The Ministry will, however, not resign till the Vote of +Supply, when they will be beaten again.</p> + +<p>“<em>1st March.</em>—To the Carlton, where I saw Drummond Wolff. +He has put a question about my peace negotiations last year, and +drew an answer from the Grand Old Man which seems to have been +very<span class="pagenum" id="Page_391">[391]</span> mixed. Mr. +Gladstone excused himself for having refused to see me at Hawarden +on the ground that I ‘should have had him there at my mercy.’ There +is more truth in this than he perhaps meant.</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd March.</em>—To Button’s, who told me all that had +happened on Saturday at the Cabinet Council. It appears that, +Granville having explained that it was absolutely impossible for +him to get on any longer with Bismarck, and in view of the other +complications, all the Cabinet but two had been in favour of +resignation. Mr. Gladstone had quite made up his mind to this, but +Spencer and Trevelyan explained that if they resigned now Lord +Salisbury would dissolve Parliament, and that Parnell would then +have his seventy Home Rule members, and the result would be a +revolt in Ireland; this was the true reason of the Government’s +decision to stay in office. The only thing that does not sound +credible in the account is that it represents the Ministry as +having sacrificed party interest for duty to the country. But it is +perhaps easier patriotically to stay in office than patriotically +to resign. The thing moreover cannot last long, and it will only +end by their being kicked out on the Vote of Supply. It is thought, +however, that if Salisbury found himself with a majority only of +one he would carry on the Government without dissolving. Stead has +been persuaded by Dilke not to publish Gordon’s letters to me. The +Government are helping now to get up a memorial to Gordon and it +would not do to publish his private ideas about them.</p> + +<p>“<em>3rd March.</em>—Went down to the India Office, where I had +a talk with Godley about an attack made on me by Lepel Griffin in +connection with my visit to India. He begged me to give him an +account of my offer of negotiation made last year to<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_392">[392]</span> Gladstone. He said: ‘You know +I have for three years past disapproved of the course that has been +taken in Egypt.’ Nobody knows better than Godley how easily Mr. +Gladstone might have prevented the whole thing if he had listened +to me.</p> + +<p>“Lady C. tells me that the Prince of Wales is going over to +Ireland, as I understand her, on a mission of pacification. I fancy +the idea is to settle the Irish question eventually on the lines of +the Austro-Hungarian settlement; and the idea might work. I don’t +suppose the Parnellites have any grudge against the Crown, though +they have against the Castle, certainly not against the Prince of +Wales. But we shall see.</p> + +<p>“Dined at the Carlton next to Jem Lowther, and talked about +Egypt and the Soudan. It is astonishing what crude ideas these Tory +leaders have. People are not wrong in calling them the stupid +Party. If I can get into Parliament I may be able to help them to +new notions on Foreign politics.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th March.</em>—Refused Escott and Bunting and Alfred +Austin to write articles for them respectively in the +‘Fortnightly,’ ‘Contemporary,’ and ‘National Reviews,’ on the +Mahdi. I think it best not to write on current politics in monthly +magazines. These magazines are beginning to get past their best day +as organs of publicity. There are too many of them, and nobody +reads them.</p> + +<p>“The Wentworths came to dinner, and we went on with them to a +meeting in Westminster Town Hall. It was poorly attended, but the +speeches were decidedly good. Wentworth spoke with something +approaching to eloquence, and Harrison made a really admirable +oration. My own speech was descriptive of the Mahdi and Gordon’s +mission. It was well received. The meeting then was invaded by some +Socialists<span class="pagenum" id="Page_393">[393]</span> and +became very noisy. I confess my sympathies are with them, as they +speak the truth, however brutally, about governments and +financiers. I have been asked to repeat my speech as a lecture at +Cambridge. It was as usual quite different from the speech I had +prepared.</p> + +<p>“Met Edward Malet to-day in St. James’s Park. We nodded.</p> + +<p>“<em>5th March.</em>—Button says about the Soudan expedition +that Wolseley would have to come home, first, on account of his +eyes, which were suffering, and they could not afford that he +should go blind, as he does all the work at the Horse Guards, even +now that he is in the Soudan, telegraphing instructions daily—and, +secondly, in view of war complications. The expedition is breaking +up rapidly, and it will be as I said, not a regiment will remain +south of Wady Halfa by midsummer’s day.</p> + +<p>“Labouchere, on whom I called, tells me the same story. He had +it from one of the Government that there was no intention at all to +make the railway to Berber. They would make it a few miles out from +Suakin, perhaps to a hill station. But even that I doubt. We +discussed the subject of the negotiations, about which he had +written to me. His idea was that I might send the Mahdi a message +from the Radical Party, advising him to send an agent to propose +peace, and asking him what terms he would accept. But I told him +this would never do. The Mahdi would require to be acknowledged, +and would only treat with the Government. All they could expect of +him was that the two plenipotentiaries should meet in Egypt. He +said the difficulty was, that to do so would be to snub Baring and +Wolseley. We finally agreed that I should once more write to Mr. +Gladstone, and place a renewal of my offer on record.<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_394">[394]</span> This I must do before the +20th, when new battles are expected with Osman Digna. I look, +however, on the Mahdi as quite safe now, with the summer before +him, and the certain change of public opinion here and foreign +complications for our arms elsewhere.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th March.</em>—Bismarck seems to be interfering once more +as honest broker, and has sent his son Herbert to London; and I +notice at the same time that the telegrams announce Hassan Fehmy as +instructed to use stiffer language to Lord Granville. He is to say +that the English explanations are vague and unsatisfactory. They +are at their wits’ ends at the Foreign Office to know what to do. +But their first step will be to recall Wolseley and his army to +Cairo.</p> + +<p>“<em>7th March.</em>—To see Stanley. He has heard that Bismarck +has promised Granville to use his good offices with Russia to +prevent any further advance on the Afghan frontier. Talked the same +matter over with Button, who is very full of the subject, and who +gave me a full account of the position as it has been told him—in +the greatest secrecy. It appears that Bismarck has recently come +forward ostensibly to make peace. This is always the avowed motive +of his interventions, but his offers generally cover some objects +of his own. In the present instance he wants Zanzibar, and Button +has it on his ‘best authority’ that in a very short time the +Zanzibar question will be brought forward. The Sultan of Zanzibar +has long wished the English Government to guarantee his son’s +succession to the throne, but we have refused, and now he is +appealing to Bismarck. There is therefore likely to be question of +a German protectorate, and its declaration will coincide with +claims by Germany to other places on the East Coast<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_395">[395]</span> of Africa. Bismarck’s mode of +action with Lord Granville is to bully him through Malet, for whom +he professes the greatest possible affection, and whom he charges +with his explosives to hurl at Granville’s head. Granville replies, +not through Malet, but through the German Ambassador. Malet is not +thought man enough to beard the lion, though they are pleased with +him for the information he gives them. He is in fact very much in +the position of a ‘Times’ correspondent at Berlin, obliged to make +himself agreeable as a condition of his receiving news.</p> + +<p>“Herbert Bismarck’s mission was suggested at New Court [the +Rothschilds’ house of business in the City] and carried out through +Rosebery, who is Rothschild’s representative in the Cabinet. At +first it was proposed by the Jews that some one should be sent from +London to Berlin, but failing this they suggested Herbert +Bismarck’s visit. The Rothschilds are very anxious that German +influence should predominate as they see in it a guarantee for +England’s remaining in Egypt, and Granville seems to have given in +to the idea, as this morning there is published an abject apology +he made last night in the House of Lords. Button thinks very likely +Bismarck may have promised his good offices with Russia, but does +not think they are sincere, and his real object is Zanzibar and the +East Coast of Africa. On the other hand the Foreign Office, as +apart from Lord Granville, is for a renewal of the +Anglo-Franco-Turco Alliance of 1854, with a self-denying clause +regarding Egypt. This would enable us to evacuate Egypt without the +fear of French occupation succeeding ours. They would also mutually +oppose Germany’s arrangement with Zanzibar. I am not sure that this +would not be the best solution of the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_396">[396]</span> difficulty. I told him in return about +Bismarck’s old scheme of renewing claims to the Dutch Colonies. +[This refers to a principle of German policy, the details of which +I had learned as long before as the late autumn of 1866, when I was +staying with Count d’Usedom, then Prussian Envoy at Florence, at +the Villa Capponi outside that city. Usedom was a man of great +enlightenment, and had been the trusted friend of the old King +Frederick William in his Liberal days, and the chief of Bismarck’s +rivals, being especially obnoxious to him on account of his English +or rather Scotch wife, Olympia Malcolm, and his suspected +Anglomania. I was very intimate with both of them, and as they were +both very indiscreet I got to know a great deal of the inner +designs of Prussian diplomacy, making, however, no use at all of my +knowledge. Amongst other things that Usedom told me was this, that +it was a settled plan at Berlin to bring about, in connection with +the proposed revival of the German Empire, also a union with +Holland, when Germany, having become a maritime power, would +reassert against England, on Holland’s behalf, a claim to the old +Dutch Colonies.]</p> + +<p>“We then talked about the Afghan complication. He said the whole +difficulty came from an absurd habit the Foreign Office had of +asking a great deal more than they were willing to take. This +place, Penjdeh, was outside the real boundary of Afghanistan, but +the Foreign Office had asked for it meaning to yield it later as a +concession. But the Russians in the meanwhile had seized it, and +the concession was rendered ten times more difficult. Button has it +(but he made me promise not to repeat it as he was not even to +allude to it in the ‘Times’) from a certain source that in view of +possible accidents, or at the Amir’s request, Lumsden +has<span class="pagenum" id="Page_397">[397]</span> received orders +to occupy Herat and put it in a state of defence. I told him, +however, that the Russians did not really mean war, certainly not +war with the Amir, but were making a demonstration in order to +detach the Amir from our alliance. This incident will not lead to +war.</p> + +<p>“In the afternoon attended a deputation to Lord Ripon given by +the Indians resident in London. Anne was seated on the daïs next +Lord Ripon. The noble Lord made a humbugging speech in which he +praised the Nizam for offering to send troops against the +Soudanese. He is already corrupted by association with his Whig +friends in office. Lady Ripon has asked us to her party next +week.</p> + +<p>“<em>8th March.</em>—Down to Crabbet, marking trees in Heathy +Ground and Burley’s Wood, and laying out a new gallop in the Upper +Park. This has been a quiet day, and has done me good, for the +excitement of the last week has made my heart ache. We went to see +Pompey, who is very ill and cannot last long now. His illness gives +him a dignity which is touching, and which I hope we may all have +before we die. [Pompey was my black servant who had been with me +for eighteen years.]</p> + +<p>“<em>9th March.</em>—To London, and called on Lady A., whose son +now I hope is safe, at least for the present, as the Buller +Division is on its way back to Korti. I did not like to call on her +before.</p> + +<p>“<em>10th March.</em>—Leonard Courtney<a id= +"FNanchor_108"></a><a href="#Footnote_108" class= +"fnanchor">[108]</a> writes proposing that I should breakfast with +him on Thursday, to talk over possible negotiations with the Mahdi. +From all I hear, the Government are ready to jump at any possible +arrangement, so it is through anybody else but me. Called on +Button, who says war is nearly certain with Russia. But I cannot +bring myself<span class="pagenum" id="Page_398">[398]</span> to +think Russia means to quarrel with the Amir—with us very likely, +but not with him. I expect it will blow over. Button advises me to +call on Staal.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th March.</em>—Saw Hobart at his club. He tells me the +Sultan has telegraphed to him expressly forbidding him to do +anything about sending troops against the Mahdi. He wanted to know +whether the Mahdi was really opposed to the Sultan, and I satisfied +him on that point, and we agreed to act together in any negotiation +of peace that might be arranged.</p> + +<p>“<em>12th March.</em>—Had a long talk at the Russian Embassy +with Staal, for whom I have a great affection. We talked the whole +political situation over, on my part very frankly, and I told him +he must not expect a revolt in India. He of course deplored the +prospect of war, which he seemed to think imminent, though I do +not. I told him all about the Egyptian War and the Mahdi and +Gordon, and the absurdities of our Ministers. He described having +been at Walmer, and how he had found Lord Granville surrounded by +dispatch boxes, tied up with different coloured string, according +as they were pressing or not; the very immediately pressing were +tied up with red tape. A proof that the Czar does not mean war is +that the Emperor of Germany has written to him asking him to +preserve peace, which he certainly would not have done unless he +knew the Czar to be willing. For my own purposes I should like +there to be a war with Russia, or at least an alarming +demonstration. But my conversation with Staal will not have had an +otherwise than deterring effect. I told him very plainly that +England meant fighting. Nélidof, he said, had been very nearly +recalled from Constantinople, but had now been sent back there with +renewed favour.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_399">[399]</span>“Breakfasted +with Leonard Courtney at 15, Cheyne Walk, and discussed with him +and his wife the prospects of negotiating with the Mahdi. I had +brought with me the draft of a new letter I was proposing to write +to Gladstone. He said it was not definite enough, and urged me to +recast it, stating the exact terms which I thought might be +accepted as a basis of negotiation. We also talked over the whole +situation and the relations of the Mahdi with the Sultan, with the +National party in Egypt, and with the Mohammedans of India. His +wife is a nice woman and more enthusiastic than he is, and at +leaving I urged her to use her influence with him to keep him up to +the mark. These Parliament people are absurdly pusillanimous, and +though Courtney is the boldest of them he is only half-hearted to +speak his mind. Button tells me that he used for years to be on the +staff of the ‘Times,’ having only left them when he took office +three or four years ago. He was considered one of their very +smartest leader writers, but of very dictatorial ways. He is +evidently a very able man. When I came home I re-wrote my letter to +Gladstone in the sense agreed upon, and, saying <em>bismillah</em>, +sent it in.<a id="FNanchor_109"></a><a href="#Footnote_109" class= +"fnanchor">[109]</a> In my covering note to Eddy, I said: ‘The fate +of several empires depends upon the reception it receives’—the +Russian, the Turkish, the Mahdi’s, and our own—also it is the ‘Ides +of March.’</p> + +<p>“To a party at Mrs. Earle’s and had some talk with Lytton. He is +bringing out his novel in verse, ‘Glenaveril.’ It is to come out in +parts, published by Murray.</p> + +<p>“<em>13th March.</em>—The Gregorys are back from Paris. He +approves of my letter to Gladstone. Then to Labouchere, who tells +me the Government are dying<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_400">[400]</span> to get out of their Soudan campaign. They +decided on going to Khartoum in the first excitement of their +disappointment about relieving Gordon, and hardly knowing whether +he was dead or alive, and they have ever since been repenting. +Lately they have been hoping to get out of the Suakin campaign by +some pretext of sending on the troops to Afghanistan instead, but +they can’t quite get up a case for it. They have never intended +making the Berber railway, but only a few miles of it, as far, +perhaps, as Sinkat. Now Osman Digna is stronger than ever, and +insists upon making raids on Suakin.</p> + +<p>“<em>14th March.</em>—Lady Gregory came to tea, and afterwards I +walked home with her. On my return I found an answer from Downing +Street. Eddy writes that ‘Mr. Gladstone is obliged to me for my +letter, but why does not the Mahdi send a representative to +England?’ This looks more like business than I had expected.</p> + +<p>“Dined with Professor Hunter and half a dozen Radicals at the +Reform Club, where it was proposed to me to make a tour of lectures +in Scotland. Hunter engaged to get me good audiences at Aberdeen, +Edinburgh, Glasgow, and other places. There was also much talk +about my going into Parliament with them, but my connection with +the Carlton Club naturally stands in my way.</p> + +<p>“<em>15th March.</em>—Zebehr has been arrested at Alexandria by +Wolseley’s order, just as Button told me he would be six months +ago. This is really too bad.</p> + +<p>“The Prince of Wales is going to Berlin to try and effect a +reconciliation with Bismarck. He considers war with Russia +inevitable, ‘and a damned good thing too.’ At least such is Lady +C.’s account of what he told her. He had also said that Wolseley +was to come back from Korti, and that the Soudan<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_401">[401]</span> campaign would come to a +natural end in a very short time. He was all for making peace with +the Mahdi.</p> + +<p>“<em>16th March.</em>—To Button, who confirms this news.</p> + +<p>“<em>17th March.</em>—An idle day at Crabbet, except that I +attended my neighbour Sir Curtis Lampson’s funeral. He was always +an excellent neighbour to me, and I sincerely regret him, as I +believe most do. I met the funeral just as it was coming through +the Rowfant covers, where I have so often shot with him. He was a +very good sportsman, and, though seventy-nine, held his gun +remarkably straight to the end. He was an American, a member of the +Hudson Bay Company, and bought the Rowfant estate from the Bethunes +some forty years ago to breed silver rabbits on for his firm. He +was made a Baronet in connection with the Atlantic Cable and the +Peabody Trust, whose executor he was. R.I.P.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th March.</em>—The Mudir of Dongola has been joined by +the Kababish and Shaghiyeh tribes, and is going to attack Berber. +This is the last we shall hear of him as Wolseley’s ally, but they +are such geese they suspect nothing. Ibrahim Bey told me a week +ago: ‘You will see that in about ten days the Mudir of Dongola will +go over openly to the Mahdi.’ He thought Zebehr’s arrest a stupid +move, as he was not really a friend of the Mahdi’s.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd March.</em>—Eddy Hamilton writes, giving a message +from Mr. Gladstone, to the effect that, ‘If it is thought the Mahdi +is not aware of the instructions to Wolseley about receiving offers +of peace, it might possibly be arranged that the Arab gentleman +should be passed through the British lines.’ This in answer to a +question made on the sixteenth as to whether he would facilitate +Ibrahim’s going to Khartoum to arrange a mission of peace from the +Mahdi.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_402">[402]</span>“The ‘Observer’ +announces severe fighting, and that Graham has retired to +Souakin.</p> + +<p>“<em>23rd March.</em>—To Courtney, to try to get him to take a +lead against the Soudan war, but he said he had left the Ministry +too short a time to do this. He thought Morley was the man for +it.</p> + +<p>“At five to Mrs. Howard. She is of opinion that they mean to +treat, and treat through me, but of course want it to be supposed +the desire is all on the Mahdi’s side. She has seen Leveson, Lord +Granville’s brother, who is decidedly for getting out of the +Soudan. So I believe is everybody. George, however, is all for war; +he means to leave Parliament after this Session. There was news of +another battle this morning, in which the English forces were +surprised by Osman Digna.</p> + +<p>“<em>24th March.</em>—The fighting of yesterday has been a very +serious affair, and I think settles Graham’s campaign at Suakin, +not on account of the proof it has given of the courage, skill, and +numbers of the Arabs so much as on account of the destruction of +the camels, and especially of the camel drivers. No native will now +dare go outside Suakin, and the English soldiers will be left to +shift for themselves. Whatever else they can do, they certainly +cannot manage camels without help. This will stop Graham just as it +stopped Wolseley.</p> + +<p>“Button, whom I saw to-day in the City, tells me they certainly +will send me to treat with the Mahdi. Matters, he says, stand in +this way: the Government has sent in an ultimatum to Russia on the +Afghan boundary question, and the answer will be given in four or +five days—Button thinks it will be refused—and then the Government +has made up its mind to clear straight out of the Soudan, and even +out of Lower Egypt, except Alexandria, handing<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_403">[403]</span> over Cairo to the Sultan who will send +troops in. In return for this the Sultan will open the Dardanelles +and Bosphorus to the British Fleet, which will attack Batoum, with +the idea of advancing to Baku and so cut off the Caspian +communications. This, however, would not be at once, the campaign +being commenced in Afghanistan. They are ready to fight Russia, if +necessary, for three years. The chief difficulty will be to prevent +Austria from advancing on Salonica; but it has been ascertained +that Bismarck will use all his influence to localize the war and +prevent Austria from taking part in it. Bismarck is not ready for a +solution of the Ottoman question. They will then be only too happy +to employ me in making peace with the Mahdi, and my employment +would now, Button says, be a popular thing, and it would not much +matter whether I succeeded or not. At the end of the summer, having +evacuated the Soudan, it would be out of the question their going +back there. Only will Russia fight? I doubt it.</p> + +<p>“Ibrahim has explained to us Zebehr’s position. The real reason +of his arrest, he said, was not so much that he had corresponded +with the Mahdi, as his connection with the Senoussis. He has +latterly been very intimate with Ibrahim el Senoussi, Senoussi’s +relative and agent at Alexandria, and in conjunction with Huseyn +Pasha, the Tunisian, he has been engaged in working upon the +Senoussi brotherhood to get them to join the Mahdi, and in his name +to attack the French in Tunis. Ibrahim Bey says, though he +naturally sympathizes with Zebehr, it is nevertheless just as well +that this plan has been stopped, as the result would have been to +bring about a community of interests between the French and English +in smashing the Mahdi.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_404">[404]</span>“<em>25th +March.</em>—It appears that our troops lost over three hundred men +on Sunday, besides seven hundred camels and a number of mules and +horses, and one hundred and fifty camp followers. Osman Digna is +wielding the sword of the Lord this time in earnest, and if there +is a God in Heaven he will prevail against the hosts of Mammon.</p> + +<p>“Hunted from Barcombe, and had the best run of the season from a +wood north of the Chailey brook to Lewes race-course without a +check. There the fox was headed, and it took us another twenty +minutes to kill him in a gorse cover; I was riding Queen of Sheba, +and, though I did not get a very good start, I was first up at the +check. There was some good fencing which the mare did admirably, +including one very stiff timber jump with ditch beyond, which she +raced over. Up the hills she passed them all but four or five, and +once on top of the down she had no difficulty in going quite to the +front; Anne on Dahma was also well up.</p> + +<p>“When we came home we heard that Pompey was dying. Thus is +pleasure mingled with grief; Pompey has been nearly eighteen years +in my service. He was an admirable servant.</p> + +<p>“<em>26th March.</em>—There are signs of the Suakin campaign +being near an end, and I feel certain another month will see the +whole thing abandoned. This will be the greatest victory of the +Faith since the siege of Vienna. Arabi writes very <em>à +propos</em> about the weak things of the world confounding the +strong, and the triumph of justice in the Soudan.<a id= +"FNanchor_110"></a><a href="#Footnote_110" class= +"fnanchor">[110]</a></p> + +<p>“To London and lunched with the Howards and sat on talking +politics. George is all for war, but he thinks that Lorne, whom he +had just been with, would willingly put himself forward in an +agitation<span class="pagenum" id="Page_405">[405]</span> for +peace, and Mrs. Howard will approach him to that effect. Then I +walked down with George to the House of Commons to hear Gladstone +make his statement about the Egyptian Finance Convention. This he +did so lamely and tamely that I went to sleep over it, as I +observed others also did.</p> + +<p>“Halim Pasha has written to Ibrahim to say that Ismaïl Jowdat, +on his arrival at Constantinople, was met by a message that he was +to come to the Palace. There he was kept twelve days and made to +draw up a report of everything he had seen, heard, or done while in +London, and then was sent home and kept there under arrest. Such is +the Sultan’s way.</p> + +<p>“Dined at Sydney Buxton’s,<a id="FNanchor_111"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_111" class="fnanchor">[111]</a> where I sat next Mrs. +Courtney. She talked about her work in the east of London, and said +she had succeeded because she had no system. She did not seem clear +that it was possible to improve the condition of the lowest class +of people by anything but individual effort. She thought education +might help them to help themselves; wasn’t sure whether teatotalism +was a good thing. To me all these matters are absolutely hopeless; +system has interfered with the natural law of society, and +unnatural misery is the result. Mrs. Buxton, on the other side of +me, told me a story of Hartington having lately written to a friend +to say he could not make out why they were fighting the Mahdi, as +he, the Mahdi, seemed to be the only man who was carrying out the +policy of Her Majesty’s Ministers. Francis Buxton was there, and we +talked about Dilke’s connection with the Joint Note of January, +1882, and he cited, <em>à propos</em> of it, a conversation he had +had with Dilke at the end of the previous year. He had told Dilke +that the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_406">[406]</span> Liberal +party would never consent to the annexation of Egypt; to which +Dilke had replied that Egypt might be annexed without calling it at +all by that name. There is no doubt he played all through for +annexation.</p> + +<p>“<em>27th March.</em>—Gave Wheeler a translation of Arabi’s +letter; I think its publication will do good. Dined at Mrs. Charles +Buxton’s, and had some talk with Lord Chancellor Selborne. He was +ready to admit they ought never to have gone into Egypt, but +thought them bound now to stay and repair the wrong done. I told +him, certainly, they had wounded the man, and must now take care he +was not left to be robbed by every passer-by. This <em>à +propos</em> of the Financial Convention being debated to-night.</p> + +<p>“<em>28th March.</em>—To Button, who showed me a letter he had +just got from Wolseley, dated ‘Camp Korti, March 2,’ narrating his +vexation at being forty-eight hours too late to save Gordon, and +his anger with Mr. Gladstone. He then recounted how his plan had +been upset by Burnaby’s death. He had intended Burnaby to succeed +Stewart if anything happened to Stewart, and had told him his plan, +but both of them got killed; and the rest of ‘our London captains,’ +Wolseley said, were good for nothing to take command of the +expedition, so the whole thing had broken down. History, he said, +would judge where the fault lay. He was evidently sorry for himself +and down on his luck. Button tells me it was all in reality +Wilson’s fault, as he wasted three days bombarding Metemmeh and +Shendy; also he ought certainly to have sent in a man with the flag +of truce offered him by the Mahdi. But Wolseley did not mention +Wilson’s name in the letter I saw. Button said he wished he could +show me one Wolseley had written to Gordon about the Government. +Wolseley<span class="pagenum" id="Page_407">[407]</span> was very +angry now with them all. Button considers the campaign over. They +can’t possibly get further than Tamaï, and war with Russia is +almost certain.</p> + +<p>“On to Stanley, whom I found in bed, and gave him the news; and +then to Hassan Fehmy, who did not seem aware of all that was +happening. But when I explained he was of course delighted. ‘When +we get the Ottoman troops to Cairo,’ he said, ‘it will be time to +proclaim the Mahdi a rebel, but we have refused to have anything to +do with it from Constantinople. That would not have looked well, +and one should never threaten unless one can execute. We will put +down the Mahdi when we are at Cairo.’ This was not of course my +idea, but I left him to his plans, feeling quite sure the Mahdi +would be able to take care of himself.</p> + +<p>“<em>30th March.</em>—A letter has come from Downing Street in +explanation of the offer already made, and I have sent my answer to +Eddy. Went to bury Pompey at Crawley and then to London, and heard +Hartington announce the news of a peaceful character from Russia. +This is unfortunate for our plans.</p> + +<p>“<em>31st March.</em>—Eddy now writes that Mr. Gladstone has +left London for Easter, and so it is impossible I should see him—he +is really at Brighton—and proposes to communicate the substance of +my last letter to Hartington, his <em>locum tenens</em>.</p> + +<p>“Hunting again, a wonderful scent. The fox took us from Danny to +the top of the hill near the Wind Mills, and along the edge of the +downs to the Dyke, a very severe run, as we went up and down the +downs fairly three times, the last pull up the Dyke Hill stopped +every horse but Queen of Sheba and a thoroughbred carrying eleven +stone and Payne the huntsman. Rode into Brighton and so up +to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_408">[408]</span> London in time +to dine at the Howards. William Morris was there in morning dress, +for he eschews tail coats, and did most of the talking on his own +special subjects—socialism, the evil of capital, and the rest. This +he does excellently well. Mrs. Howard advises me strongly to see +Hartington if I get the chance. He is quite honest, she says, being +a Cavendish, and no Cavendish was ever able to lie. Humph!</p> + +<p>“<em>1st April.</em>—Button promises to find out Hartington’s +ideas about peace from Brett, in case I hear any more from him.</p> + +<p>“Lunched at the Carlton, in the vicinity of members of the +Fourth Party. Wolff tells me that Randolph is expected home on +Tuesday.</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd April.</em>—Went to see Lord Lorne at Kensington +Palace. I find him very pleasant, and sufficiently intelligent +about Egyptian affairs, and we talked for an hour. My object was to +get him to take the lead in demonstrations against the Soudan war, +but I could not get him to promise anything definite. He is going +to stand for a Metropolitan Borough, however, and says he will lose +no occasion to oppose the war in his electioneering. This kept me +so late that I almost missed my train for Birmingham, where I had +to attend a meeting on the same subject. But I just hit it off, +made my speech, and was back in London by midnight.</p> + +<p>“<em>3rd April.</em>—A letter came yesterday, while I was away, +from Downing Street, and I went to ask Button’s advice about it. It +said that the policy of the Government was one of freedom for the +Soudan, and I was inclined to take it as a mere phrase, but Button +strongly advised me to accept it in all seriousness, so as to pin +the Government down to their declaration, and dispatch Ibrahim to +carry the news<span class="pagenum" id="Page_409">[409]</span> to +the Mahdi. So I have written my answer in Button’s sense, and shall +go to Paris to-morrow to set things going. <em>Bismillah!</em></p> + +<p>“To-day being a Bank Holiday, Button and I, like two clerks, +rode out to Putney and Coombe and back again. The day was fine and +enjoyable. We are expecting a great battle to be fought to-day at +Tamaï.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th April.</em>—Osman Digna has made an April fool of +Graham, who marched his whole army of twelve thousand men ‘to the +top of the hill,’ and then found no enemy, and marched them down +again. They will have to evacuate Suakin without a victory. This is +just what we most want.</p> + +<p>“To Paris by the tidal train, and travelled as far as Dover with +Lord Lorne and his sister (Lady Constance Campbell), who are also +going abroad. We talked on many subjects besides Egypt, such as the +Crofter question in Scotland, the Land question in England, Riel’s +revolt in Canada, and the Irish question. Lord Lorne was very +sympathetic on Eastern matters, advising me only not to mix up +Arabi with the Soudan peace agitation.</p> + +<p>“I forgot to say that Button told me yesterday that the Russian +answer about the Afghan frontier is, after all, far from +satisfactory. Dufferin has been given <em>carte blanche</em> to +treat with the Amir, who demands a guarantee for his dynasty, as +well as for his dominions.</p> + +<p>“Dined at the Hotel Wagram with Jemal-ed-Din, to whom I read the +whole of my correspondence with Downing Street. He approved the +line taken, but insists that the English Government must write a +letter to the Mahdi for Ibrahim to carry. He will think the matter +over, however, and decide in a day or two. There is no hurry just +now, as the Mahdi can much better afford to wait than Mr. +Gladstone.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_410">[410]</span>“<em>5th April, +Easter Sunday.</em>—Breakfast with Bitters in the Rue Mazarine, and +in the afternoon coming home I stopped at the Embassy and had a +talk with Sheffield, who was communicative as usual. Among other +things, he told me that Gladstone had been very much in favour of +having the Turkish Pashas in Egypt made to pay up the arrears of +taxation. But Baring and Northbrook had persuaded him that +government would be impossible if they offended these gentry, so +they have gone on screwing the money out of the fellahin, and have +raised this ridiculous joint loan.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th April.</em>—Breakfasted again with Bitters and Godfrey +Webb. The French have been without a Ministry for the last week, +but to-day Monsieur Brisson has formed one; I know too little about +French politics to guess what it portends. Everybody, however, is +very angry with Ferry, the late minister, on account of the Tonquin +defeats. The lesson given to Ferry will not be lost on Gladstone, +and will be in favour of peace in Africa.</p> + +<p>“<em>7th April.</em>—Jemal-ed-Din and Sanua breakfasted with +me.</p> + +<p>“<em>8th April.</em>—Breakfasted once more with Bitters, and +once more to the Jeu de paume, where there was a great gathering: +old Villeplaine, Brinquant, O’Connor, and the Henneseys, besides +Elcho, Arthur Balfour, and Bungo Herbert. The Elchos are at the +Hotel Mirabeau with Godfrey Webb and the Miss Tennants, Laura and +Margot.</p> + +<p>“<em>9th April.</em>—Breakfasted with the Wagrams. They say +peace has been arranged between France and China. Then to the Hotel +Mirabeau. Arthur Balfour was there, and we talked about the Afghan +and Soudan questions, and while we were talking Elcho came in, +having been at the Embassy and<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_411">[411]</span> having heard there of the Battle of +Penjdeh. We all agreed that this means war. The newspaper boys on +the Boulevard were calling out this evening, ‘Guerre +Russo-Anglaise—grande Victoire Russe.’</p> + +<p>“<em>13th April.</em>—Jemal-ed-Din came early, and I read him a +new and unsatisfactory letter I received last night from Downing +Street. He insists that the Government must write a letter to the +Mahdi if they want him to treat; and he says he will come over to +England if necessary to arrange about it, if only I will guarantee +his not being arrested there. I told him there was no danger of +arrest, but his experience in India has made him suspicious of the +English Government. He says there is no reason whatever now that +Arabi should not come back to Egypt if the opportunity offered of a +reconciliation with Tewfik. Tewfik is so feeble and discredited as +to be no longer dangerous, and Arabi would rapidly regain all his +lost influence.</p> + +<p>“Back by the tidal train to England.”</p> + +<p>N.B.—My correspondence with 10, Downing Street of this date will +be found in <a href="#appc">Appendix C,</a> and is worth reading. +It would have been still possible that spring to arrange terms of +peace directly with the Mahdi, who was not the impracticable +personage he has been represented to be by our official historians. +Under his successor, the Khalifa Abdullah el Taïshi, all +negotiation became much more difficult. But, unfortunately for both +Egypt and the Soudan, the opportunity was let slip and became final +through the Mahdi’s death in July. It was probably Lord Cromer’s +influence, as in the previous year, that decided it.</p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_412">[412]</span><a id= +"c11"></a>CHAPTER XI</h2> + +<p class="sch1">RANDOLPH CHURCHILL AND THE FOURTH PARTY</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">“<em>14th April</em>, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="nind space-above15"><span class="dcap2">“T</span>O see +Button. He tells me there will not now be war with Russia. +Jemal-ed-Din told me the same thing yesterday and I believe it, for +Russia is now in the position of a man who having had an +altercation with another has boxed his ears. He can afford to +apologize. Button tells me Randolph has returned from India quite +in harmony with my ideas. Lord Ripon’s, Randolph thinks, was the +only policy, though clumsily carried out, and if he had not made +reforms when he did we should be now in the position of having them +forced from us as the price of native loyalty. He is also wholly +against the Soudan war. This accords with a letter from him I got +last night.</p> + +<p>“I asked Button his advice about my going into Parliament, and +told him I was intending to ask Churchill to support me as a Fourth +Party candidate. But he strongly advised me not to do so. He said, +in the first place, it was doubtful whether I should get in; and, +in the second, Churchill would be sure afterwards to throw it in my +teeth. ‘Take his advice if you like,’ he said, ‘but don’t commit +yourself as his supporter.’ I said: ‘Then there is nothing for me +but to go to Parnell.’ This Button thought would be much better. He +said: ‘As a Nationalist you will have a great position, and there +will always be sixty or seventy members who will believe in you on +Foreign affairs; I advise you to do this and have nothing to do +with Randolph. Remember how O’Connell always threw it in Disraeli’s +teeth that he<span class="pagenum" id="Page_413">[413]</span> had +once applied to him to get him into Parliament. About my +correspondence with Downing Street, he thought they would not give +any written message to the Mahdi, but advised me to continue to +treat their assurances as serious, and to express our readiness to +send the messenger.</p> + +<p>“At eleven I called on Randolph and found him very glad to see +me, and I really like him better than any of them personally. He +told me about India pretty much what Button had told me of his +opinions, and he entirely took my view of the Hyderabad intrigue. +He said if Lord Ripon had not appointed Salar Jung they would +certainly have annexed the country, and there were still intrigues +at work of the old sort. He also spoke strongly of the great +intelligence and good sense of the ‘natives,’ especially of the +Mohammedans and Mahrattas. He had seen Rajah Amir Hassan of +Mahmudabad and shared my views about the Mohammedan university, and +he had stayed with Lyall and talked about me with him.<a id= +"FNanchor_112"></a><a href="#Footnote_112" class= +"fnanchor">[112]</a> The only thing he had disagreed with was my +having said that Salar Jung had been poisoned; for he said that +young Salar Jung had expressed his disbelief in anything of the +sort, and he had talked to him very confidentially. He then asked +me to write a poem for the Conservative party for Sir Arthur +Sullivan to set to music. I asked: ‘With something about the +primrose in it?’ He said: ‘Yes, if you like—but it does not matter +so much what it is, so long as it is patriotic.’ I told him I would +think about it, but feared I couldn’t manage the primrose.</p> + +<p>“Then Wolff came in and we talked about Lepel Griffin. Churchill +said that he, Griffin, had shown him his article against me in +proof at Indore, and he had expostulated with him about publishing +it, and<span class="pagenum" id="Page_414">[414]</span> Griffin +would have stopped it if he could, but it was too late. We also +talked about the Soudan. Churchill promised to write a letter to be +read at the Birmingham meeting if I liked. Next about Zebehr’s +arrest and Tewfik’s intrigues. ‘We must get Tewfik deposed,’ he +said, ‘as soon as Abbas comes of age, and have Arabi back.’ Then I +asked to talk with him in private and Wolff went away. I said I was +going to consult him about getting into Parliament; I wanted to +push my ideas, but hardly knew how to set about it. He said: ‘Oh! I +can do that for you whenever you like. If you will come forward as +my supporter you can’t do better, and I am asked almost every day +to recommend candidates.’ I said: ‘What will this bind me to? You +know my foreign politics, but at home I am a Catholic and a Tory as +regards the land question and education, and in Ireland I am a +Nationalist.’ He made a face at the word ‘Nationalist.’ He said: +‘You could not come forward as an avowed Nationalist, but you need +not say much about that. If you say that you have wide opinions on +the Irish question it will be enough, and when you are once in +Parliament you can take your own line.’ ‘But what,’ I said, ‘is +Tory democracy? Tell me in two words, for I don’t think I quite +understand it.’ He said: ‘That is a question I am always in a +fright lest some one should put it to me publicly. To tell the +truth I don’t know myself what Tory democracy is. But I believe it +is principally opportunism. But say you are a Tory democrat and +that will do.’ I said: ‘You know me well enough to be sure that I +would not be paid to be in Parliament if I was not free to take my +own line. I had thought of standing as an Irish Home Ruler with +Parnell, but I was in doubt, and thought I would consult you.’ He +said: ‘You would lose your influence if you did<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_415">[415]</span> this. Parnell would require +you to join in his policy of obstruction and you would be +discredited. You had better not commit yourself to that, though you +might vote with him on purely Irish questions. But you should write +me out a programme of your ideas, and I will see if there is a +constituency that will accept them.’ I said: ‘I will think it over +and let you know.’ Now I shall consult Mrs. Howard, who will advise +me to go in as a Radical, but that I can’t and won’t do. I think +perhaps, after all, I shall be freest with Randolph; and certainly +his conversation to-day binds me to nothing.</p> + +<p>“F. P. [a young lieutenant R.N. who had been serving with the +Naval Brigade in the Nile campaign] gives me some good accounts of +forced labourers courbashed and chained, under British officers. +Four thousand forced labourers were supplied for the Nile +Expedition, half from Dongola, half from Esneh. They were put to +twelve and thirteen hours labour in the extreme heat of August, +only allowed half an hour in the day to rest; they were small, weak +men, and would work only under the whip. Colonel Grant, in command +of the Dongolese, expostulated against their being so employed. F., +who was with the naval contingent, did not have the men under his +own command beaten by English sailors. His remark was: ‘They did +not give it them so thoroughly, but they seemed to mind it more.’ +Many ran away, but were brought back with chains round their necks. +He had found five men one night lying flat with their mouths full +of sand; they would have died if he had not kicked them up and made +them eat. They were kept once five days without food. Colonel +Inglefield, in command of the Esneh men, blew his brains out in a +fever in the next tent to F. He says when Wolseley came up +he<span class="pagenum" id="Page_416">[416]</span> was quite taken +aback at sight of what the river was. Hammill had surveyed it all +and told him of its being impracticable, and so had every one else +who had seen it. He is very bitter against Wolseley.<a id= +"FNanchor_113"></a><a href="#Footnote_113" class= +"fnanchor">[113]</a></p> + +<p>“<em>15th April.</em>—Wrote draft letters to Mr. Gladstone and +Eddy Hamilton in answer to Eddy’s last, and took them to Mrs. +Howard, with whom and with whose daughter Mary I spent four hours +talking. She thinks Gladstone is serious about negotiating with the +Mahdi, and that it is paying me a great compliment to discuss +affairs so delicate with me. I am not sure. She won’t hear of my +having anything to do with Randolph, still less with Parnell, and +says that I should be doing no good going into Parliament at all. +If I should render some signal service to the Government by helping +them to make peace or otherwise, they would give me a seat in the +House of Lords; but I should only lose my influence by going into +the House of Commons.</p> + +<p>“<em>16th April.</em>—There is a remarkable letter in to-day’s +‘Daily News,’ giving the account of an Egyptian soldier who had +been with Gordon in Khartoum. According to this, the Mahdi +distinctly offered Gordon to evacuate, and Gordon refused. There +are also tales of the capture of women and children by General +Graham, and of his having sent them prisoners to Massowa. F. P. +tells me that, when he was at Suakin last June, rewards of £1 were +offered for the right hands of Arabs brought by friendly ‘natives’ +into the British camp.</p> + +<p>“Went to see Stanley, and arranged with him to bring forward the +case of the Massowa prisoners, and then to Labouchere about a +series of questions to be put on Monday as to military barbarities, +forced labour, etc. He tells me that Chamberlain<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_417">[417]</span> has proposed to him, as +representing the Radical opposition to the Soudan War, that the +Radicals should not object to the Government’s making their railway +as far as Sinkat on condition it goes no further. They would then +hand it over to a company and retire, boasting that they had +civilized Eastern Soudan. They want to be out of the thing, but +must have something to show for the money they have spent.</p> + +<p>“Hobart tells me that the arrangement being made with the Sultan +is that there should be a joint English and Turkish occupation of +Egypt; the Turkish general to be provided with an English +staff.<a id="FNanchor_114"></a><a href="#Footnote_114" class= +"fnanchor">[114]</a></p> + +<p>“F. tells me stories of how the English soldiers are insulted in +the streets of Cairo. They all hate the Egyptians now, being hated +by them. But the Egyptian soldiers are devoted to their English +officers.</p> + +<p>“<em>17th April.</em>—A letter came last night from Downing +Street which seems to ask for direct communication with the Mahdi’s +agent. But Button assures me that an agreement was come to the day +before yesterday with the Sultan of the kind spoken of by Hobart, +and thinks the letter means that they want nothing more of me. It +may very likely be so. George Howard thinks the whole +correspondence merely humbug on Gladstone’s part, and that he has +never had any really serious intentions. He has become an utter +unbeliever in Gladstone, and speaks more bitterly against him than +any one I know out of the Carlton Club. He was for annexation, but +says I prevented it by stirring up the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_418">[418]</span> Radicals and I have not done any good to +Egypt instead. Mrs. Howard is disgusted at the arrangement with the +Sultan, and half agreed that I was justified now in making any +arrangement I liked with Randolph. Button is angry with Buckle for +not making full use of the news he brings him, and talks of leaving +the ‘Times.’</p> + +<p>“<em>19th April.</em>—Had luncheon at the Carlton Club, where +they were going through the absurdity of Primrose Day. I sat with +Randolph, Wolff, and Borthwick; they wanted me to put one of these +flowers in my buttonhole, but I said I must draw the line +somewhere. This worship of an old Hebrew gentleman under the form +of a primrose is certainly one of the most ridiculous ever +imagined. Randolph talked about the arrangement just made with the +Sultan for sending Turkish troops into Egypt, and was all for an +attack on the Government. But I persuaded him not to make any move +against the Sultan. He has made an excellent beginning with the +Indian Mohammedans, and this would not be understood by them. He +told me of his having taken up the cause of the native water +carriers at Benares, who were being impressed for the Soudan +campaign, an incident which shows he has a true instinct with +Orientals. I am writing him a letter stating my political views, +and asking him to what extent they are in harmony with Tory +democracy. It will be the manifesto of my political opinions.</p> + +<p>“Down to Crabbet.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st April.</em>—A telegram from Button in the evening +saying that the Khartoum expedition is abandoned, and eleven +millions asked for Russian and Soudan wars.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd April.</em>—The eleven millions seem to have taken +everybody’s breath away, and war with Russia<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_419">[419]</span> is considered certain, the garrisons to +be withdrawn from the Soudan.</p> + +<p>“Finished a letter to Churchill, giving my political views, home +and foreign, and proposing them as compatible with Tory democracy, +and took it to London to show to Mrs. Howard. Of course she is much +against my sending it; but as I left said: ‘Well, it will be +amusing, anyhow, to see how you get on with him. But I call it an +intrigue.’ Button, whom I saw afterwards, objected on other +grounds. He said I could not count on Randolph that he would not +throw me over, and he could not get me into Parliament. Nobody +would believe me sincere in my Home Conservativism, and +Conservatives would not support me. He strongly advised me again to +join Parnell rather than Randolph, people would understand that; I +should have more influence, and besides be quite certain of a seat +in Parliament. He is to meet Randolph, however, on Friday, and will +try to find out what he really means; and in the meanwhile I +withhold my letter.</p> + +<p>“<em>23rd April.</em>—George Wyndham has written home accounts +of the enormous number of the Hadendowas who have been killed. Some +of these Hadendowas had shaved their heads and wore the Mahdi’s +uniform, ‘a wonderful instance of fanaticism.’ They (the English +officers) are all sick, however, of the war.</p> + +<p>“Rode in the Park with Sullivan (Sir Edward Sullivan), who tells +me Mr. Gladstone dined with Bertram Currie on Tuesday after the +announcement of the eleven millions war vote. He was in high +spirits, and said the announcement of eleven millions was received +by the House ‘with solemnity.’ He is to give a breakfast to Miss +Mary Anderson to-day. Pembroke was also riding, and came and +talked<span class="pagenum" id="Page_420">[420]</span> about the +Soudan. He could wish, he said, that after having killed the Arabs +‘we could leave them some substantial benefit in the shape of a +railway.’ What fools the best of them are.</p> + +<p>“A letter has come from Eddy, giving a new opening, it seems, +for correspondence. Consulted Ibrahim about it; he tells me the +French are sending a secret mission to the Mahdi, <em>via</em> +Tripoli, and thinks I might hint this to Downing Street.<a id= +"FNanchor_115"></a><a href="#Footnote_115" class= +"fnanchor">[115]</a></p> + +<p>“<em>24th April.</em>—It appears that a dynamite explosion took +place yesterday morning during Mr. Gladstone’s breakfast party with +Mary Anderson. Everybody talks now of war as certain, but Button +says it will only be a withdrawal of Ambassadors for the present. +The Turkish arrangement has fallen through, if it ever existed, +through Bismarck’s prohibition to the Sultan of opening the +Dardanelles to our fleet. This, perhaps, accounts for Eddy’s +renewal of correspondence.</p> + +<p>“To the House of Commons and saw John Morley and Leonard +Courtney, and urged on them to press the Government to withdraw +<em>immediately</em> from the Soudan, as otherwise the Mahdi may +again advance. They said they understood the Government was +intending certainly to do so, but they would endeavour to get some +assurance from them during the debate. Morley, however, would have +nothing to do with urging negotiations with the Mahdi, whom the +Government intended to leave to ‘stew in his juice.’</p> + +<p>“Bertram, whom I called on later, tells me that Mr. Gladstone +told him at dinner on Tuesday that his idea was still to neutralize +Egypt under a government of its own, and that he counted on the +French to aid in doing this. Bertram, who doubtless +repeats<span class="pagenum" id="Page_421">[421]</span> Mr. +Gladstone’s tone on these matters, complained of the +<em>unfair</em> conduct of the French. ‘If they go on much longer,’ +he said, ‘Mr. Gladstone will throw the whole thing on their hands +and clear bodily out of Egypt.’ He also talked of perhaps handing +it over to the Sultan, who after all was the legal owner; things +were in a deadlock all round.</p> + +<p>“<em>25th April.</em>—Lady Wentworth came to luncheon, and took +me to the Grosvenor Gallery, private view. The exhibition is not +nearly as good as last year, but there is a fine portrait of +Gladstone by Millais, one of his best, with his eye fixing you like +some bird of prey.</p> + +<p>“<em>26th April.</em>—To Mark Napier’s at Fulham for lawn +tennis. He showed me a letter he had received from Sir Charles +Wilson, saying it was Awwam who betrayed Gordon at Khartoum. This +is a fine piece of retributive justice, for it was Awwam whom +Colvin persecuted because he had complained of the rogueries in the +Cadastral service. Colvin had him arrested and put in irons after +the bombardment of Alexandria, and tried by a mock tribunal and +exiled to Khartoum. I wrote, when the amnesty was promised, to +Dufferin to complain especially of Awwam’s treatment, and he +referred my letter to Wilson, who did nothing. So Awwam remained at +Khartoum, and now this very Wilson writes complaining that he +betrayed Gordon. Thus is injustice sometimes requited.<a id= +"FNanchor_116"></a><a href="#Footnote_116" class= +"fnanchor">[116]</a></p> + +<p>“At dinner last night at the Denbighs’ Hobart was very warlike, +and talked of commanding the Turkish Fleet in the Black Sea; the +Turks might at first pretend neutrality, and refuse a passage to +English ships, but would join later. I sat next to<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_422">[422]</span> Lady Dorothy Nevill, certainly +the pleasantest old woman in London. She is a friend, she tells me, +of Chamberlain’s, who tells her the electors care nothing for +foreign politics; she has also seen Gladstone lately, who is in the +highest spirits at the prospect of a new war. On my other side was +Lady Brett, Reginald Brett’s mother, who says she hears from Berlin +that Bismarck treats Malet like a little boy. Of course he does, he +has always known him as such. Lord Salisbury was also there, but I +had no opportunity of speaking to him.</p> + +<p>“The Prince of Wales has written to Lady C., saying he is +delighted with his Irish tour, and is to be back, I think, on +Tuesday. I hear, however, from others, that it has been in reality +a fiasco.</p> + +<p>“<em>27th April.</em>—Called on Justin McCarthy, who has a small +lodging with his son in Ebury Street, but he was not up. The Irish +girl who opened the door told me he never got up till the middle of +the day, but I could see him between two and three. Then to Percy +Wyndham in Belgrave Square, who deplores all that is going on in +public affairs. He is an upright, honest man, with ideas too—but +just short of the power to lead, so he has achieved nothing, and +will retire after this Parliament. Back to McCarthy in the +afternoon, whom I found with his son. My object in calling was to +propose an alliance with Parnell, but we talked first about the +Mahdi, and I asked to be put in communication with O’Kelly. This +they promised to do, and, as I found them sensible and sympathetic, +I broached the real subject with them. Young Huntley was most +cordial; the elder, Justin, however, had had some experience of +English alliances, and said they had several times been +disappointed, as notably with Lord Robert Montagu. He also was +cordial but more cautious;<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_423">[423]</span> he said my connection with Arabi was well +known; Arabi was a great hero in Ireland; so was the Mahdi. He +thought Mr. Parnell would be very glad to talk the matter over with +me, and he would arrange a meeting. They asked had I property in +Ireland, and they were glad to hear I had none. What did I think +about coercion? Could they count on me to turn out the Government? +I told him that I was quite prepared to follow Parnell’s lead on +all Irish questions short of dynamite; that in England I should +expect to be free. I was a friend of Churchill’s, and should +probably support him. On foreign politics they knew my opinions, +and those of course I could not give up. As a Nationalist I could +take up the cause of Ireland with my heart in it. Also I was a +Catholic and opposed to the present Government. On all these +matters they expressed themselves satisfied, saying that I had +given too many proofs of having the courage of my opinions for them +to have any doubt about me. But the first thing would be to see +Parnell.</p> + +<p>“I am sure these two are very honest fellows, whatever the +others may be, and they said they had no quarrel with England if +they got self-government. They did not want separation; they did +not ask me to be unloyal to my country. But they were sure to +succeed. They would have a great addition of strength in the next +Parliament, and counted on several English constituencies. They +counted, too, on Churchill, who was in favour of Home Rule, and my +being a friend of his would be a recommendation in Irish eyes. On +the whole I think the thing will work, and I am highly satisfied +with my visit. I feel more at home with these people than in the +Carlton Club.</p> + +<p>“Down to the House of Commons to hear Mr.<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_424">[424]</span> Gladstone’s statement about the war, and +on the Vote of Credit. There was a previous debate connected with +it, in which Arthur O’Connor proposed an amendment, speaking +moderately and well. Arthur Balfour, too, spoke with some +eloquence, and there was a division which the Government won by a +small majority. Then Gladstone spoke, a really fine speech, the +first fine one I have heard him make. At the beginning he was not +felicitous, as he involved himself in one of his hair-splitting +arguments about his own consistency, and Harcourt had to pull him +vigorously by the coat tails to get him in hand again. But +afterwards he was very clear, to the point, and impressive. His +speech was generally taken in the House as a declaration of war +against Russia; but I think he will try to arbitrate first. About +the Soudan he admitted everything I had been urging for the past +year, and condemned himself most emphatically; the people at +Khartoum had been really against Gordon, they really liked the +Mahdi, and the Mahdi was really establishing a Government; why +should they be disturbed? Why indeed! I am glad to have heard this +speech, as I am sure it is one of the best he ever made—perhaps his +last great speech. The delivery was very remarkable and so dramatic +as to suggest the impression that he must have got it up carefully +beforehand with Irving and Mary Anderson. The effect on the House +was decisive, so that the eleven millions were voted without a +dissentient voice. It was a scene to be remembered. But as a matter +of fact, the unanimity was due, I hear, to the accident of +Labouchere and Randolph Churchill being away at dinner. Both had +intended to move amendments. The effect of the speech, however, was +very apparent, for at the beginning the sense of the House, both on +his own and the other side, had<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_425">[425]</span> been distinctly against Mr. Gladstone. The +triumph was due solely to his eloquence.</p> + +<p>“Dined at the Carlton Club.</p> + +<p>“<em>28th April.</em>—Rode early. Then to Mrs. Howard, to tell +her my ideas about Ireland. She does not much approve.</p> + +<p>“<em>29th April.</em>—Button tells me that Wolseley is very +angry at the idea of abandoning the Soudan campaign, says the Mahdi +will be up again shortly and wants to finish him off. To a party at +Mrs. T.’s, where I met Lessar, the Russian agent. He looks his +character all over, being a little, inquisitive, dark, furtive man; +but in conversation he talks frankly enough. I had a few words with +him about the collision between East and West. ‘But what are we to +do,’ he asked, ‘when the East won’t be quiet and we come into +collision?’ I said, ‘The West should retire.’</p> + +<p>“<em>30th April.</em>—Things already look more like peace with +Russia, and I am inclined to think the whole thing has been got up +by Gladstone in order to get himself out of the Soudan. I met that +great man this afternoon in Pall Mall; he was nearly run over by a +cab crossing in front of the Athenaeum, and I followed him down the +steps, past the Duke of York’s Column, and along Whitehall to +Downing Street. He did not see me, but walked on, black and gloomy, +in black, ill-fitting clothes, like a schoolmaster or an +undertaker. He was followed at a distance of twenty yards by a +detective in plain clothes, who eyed me suspiciously, especially +when I crossed between him and his charge, who, taking out his +latchkey, let himself in at the garden gate and disappeared.</p> + +<p>“<em>1st May.</em>—Button says it is all off with the Turks now, +and Hassan Fehmy wants to be away<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_426">[426]</span> back to Constantinople. Two days ago I +wrote a violent letter to the ‘Times’ about the atrocities in the +Soudan, and I have arranged with Labouchere that when it appears he +shall follow it up in the House of Commons. I alluded in my letter +to the story of the reward offered at Suakin for human hands. F. P. +tells me it was C. who paid the money for them.</p> + +<p>“Button tells me that Mr. Gladstone writes every day to Stead +refuting his advocacy of Russia. But I am not sure the Government +has not put Stead up to it, so as to prepare for a withdrawal from +the quarrel.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th May.</em>—My letter was printed in the ‘Times’ this +morning. To the House of Commons, and saw Morley walking with +Brett. I had begged him to put a question to Government about a +plan which has been announced for surrounding and capturing Osman +Digna. He told me he had not put the question publicly, but had +received a private assurance that no attack on Osman Digna was +intended; so I hope we have put a spoke in Wolseley’s wheel. Brett +told me the same thing.</p> + +<p>“<em>5th May.</em>—It is announced that Wolseley’s expedition is +postponed, and so my letter seems to have succeeded. Mr. Gladstone +made a statement last night entirely backing out of his quarrel +with Russia, and during the debate that followed Randolph made a +remarkable speech, the most important I have heard him make. It was +well prepared and considered, and was very well received; but it +was not oratory of the first water. As to the matter, it was a +violent attack on Russia, with jingo talk about India. I did not +wholly sympathize with this, but it will certainly have put him on +a higher platform with his party.</p> + +<p>“Lady C. sees old Lucan very frequently, and he<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_427">[427]</span> tells her all the War Office +secrets, and she told me they intended a <em>coup</em> at Suakin. +But I hope we have put a stop to that. The Prince of Wales has been +to see her, and she asked him about my going to the Levee and what +uniform I should wear. He said that, as I had been five years in +diplomacy, I was entitled to wear the diplomatic. So I shall go to +it, as I am coming out as a Home Ruler. It seems he is quite +pacified about me now, but is only urgent that I should attend a +levee. Old Lucan is very warlike, would like—‘By God!’—to go at the +Russians again himself. He is the last at the Horse Guards who was +a general in the Crimean War. He is eighty.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th May.</em>—General Graham has bungled the whole campaign +at Suakin. Alan Charteris, who has come home from there, says all +the troops are disgusted and want the thing to end. There have been +letters in the same sense from up the Nile, where the men are +living, or rather dying, in bell tents. George Wyndham is +enthusiastic about the Arabs, I am glad to hear. Wolseley keeps on +board ship at Suakin, pretending he is unwell.</p> + +<p>“Saw Labouchere, who was starting to lay the foundation stone of +a Primitive Methodist Chapel. ‘To such things,’ he said, ‘we are +reduced at election time.’</p> + +<p>“Met Parnell by appointment at the House of Commons, and walked +up and down the central lobby with him. He told me that it would +not do my standing for an Irish constituency; there were too many +jealousies, and an Englishman would be looked upon as an +interloper, whoever he was. Everybody was wanting to be in +Parliament, and he was afraid of giving a cause of disunion. ‘My +countrymen,’ he said, ‘have the weakness of quarrelling<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_428">[428]</span> with each other; it is their +national defect.’ ‘Like the Arabs,’ I remarked. Then he corrected +himself, as if he had said too much. ‘Besides,’ he said, ‘we have +always been betrayed by all the English who have gone with us—every +one. Sometimes by our own people, but always by the English.’ I +said: ‘I think you need not fear that in my case.’ ‘No,’ he said, +‘I do not doubt you; but it would be difficult to make the others +understand. For this reason I do not propose that you should come +forward in Ireland. But if you choose an English constituency I can +promise you, wherever it is, the solid Irish vote. You would vote +with us on all Irish questions, but we should not ask what you +thought on other matters. Get Lord Randolph to nominate you where +there are Irish, and I will do all I can for you.’ I was struck by +Parnell’s frankness and straightforwardness in this conversation, +and he has a special charm of manner which doubtless gives him his +power.</p> + +<p>“<em>7th May.</em>—An inordinately busy day, caused by the +announcement of a new ‘victory’ of Graham’s at Suakin. It is a very +bad case, the worst that has happened, for they have surrounded a +Bedouin camp, with women and children and cattle, and have fired +into the lot, killing a hundred and fifty, and intending to +exterminate. This has made me so angry I have not been able to eat +all day, and have been galloping over the town getting up an +agitation. My first act was to write to Morley. I reminded him of +his share in the Alexandrian Bombardment, and called upon him to +behave like an honest man and join me. I took the letter to +Courtney and showed it to him and his wife, who took the matter up +warmly. And they sent me on to Burt, the working-man member; he, +too, promised me all assistance.<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_429">[429]</span> Then I went to Randolph, who was delighted +to join in the fray, and who arranged with Northbrook to support +any motion for adjournment the Radicals might move. And then to +Labouchere and the House of Commons, where I talked to O’Shea<a id= +"FNanchor_117"></a><a href="#Footnote_117" class= +"fnanchor">[117]</a> and others, so that I got some of all parties +to join me. The upshot of it was that at question time Morley asked +for explanations, and a nice little discussion followed, and +Hartington promised a definite statement of military policy for +Monday. This is very satisfactory, but from all I hear we shall +have to work hard to stop the war, for Wolseley and Baring<a id= +"FNanchor_118"></a><a href="#Footnote_118" class= +"fnanchor">[118]</a> are moving heaven and earth to get the +campaign renewed, and Hartington and Northbrook are with them. They +fancy they can still make something commercially profitable out of +the Berber railway, and, what is more important, save their own +precious bacon. Gladstone in one of his answers made a quibble +which looks specially ominous. He acknowledged his statement of +policy made last Monday week, but qualified it by explaining that +it was made in connection with the Russian imbroglio. They +certainly have it in their minds to renew the war, but Button +assures me nothing is yet absolutely decided.</p> + +<p>“Randolph, when I saw him, talked over the matter of my going +into Parliament. I told him of my conversation yesterday with +Parnell, and showed him the paper I drew up a little while ago, +headed ‘Am I a Tory Democrat?<a id="FNanchor_119"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_119" class="fnanchor">[119]</a> of which he approved as +a possible basis of my joining his party, though he said of course +he did not pledge himself to go with me on all points. He objected +a little to my using<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_430">[430]</span> the word Home Rule. ‘I know, of course,’ he +said, ‘it must come to this, but we haven’t educated the Party up +to it yet, and it would have been better to use some vaguer +expression.’ Also he thought the allusion to Midlothian was +unnecessary, or I might have said: ‘If there was anything good in +the Midlothian doctrines.’ Nevertheless he was pleased with the +paper as a whole, and promised me all his support and gave me +Middleton’s<a id="FNanchor_120"></a><a href="#Footnote_120" class= +"fnanchor">[120]</a> address at St. Stephen’s Chambers, and +authorized me to tell him that he had sent me to arrange for a +constituency, and that I should be of very great value to the +Conservative Party. This is, perhaps, the very best combination I +could have, for it leaves me absolutely free, and I come in as an +independent Member on all points on which I care to be independent. +The only question is, ‘Shall I come in?’ Randolph also showed me a +letter he had received from Sir Frederic Roberts<a id= +"FNanchor_121"></a><a href="#Footnote_121" class= +"fnanchor">[121]</a> about the state of the army in India, which +was interesting. It urged, of course, a large increase of forces if +we were to fight the Russians; but it was a sensible letter. It +said that the native army was less good than it looked; some +regiments were very good, but not by any means all. I feel +confident I shall get on with Randolph; all his instincts are right +ones, and he has courage and is absolutely the reverse of a +prig.</p> + +<p>“<em>8th May.</em>—Morley has written a line, saying he will +bring on the question of Graham’s victory [over the women and +children] again to-night, and has appointed to meet me at one on +Monday. I have decided to go to the Levee that day, as it will be +necessary if I am to stand as a Conservative, especially as a Home +Rule Conservative.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_431">[431]</span>“Had some +conversation with Frederic Harrison in the Park. At two I went to +the Peace Association, and arranged for a special meeting to-morrow +to protest against a renewal of the Soudan War. There I learned +that there was to be a great meeting at the Town Hall, Birmingham, +and I made up my mind to go down there and move a resolution. This +I did. The meeting was a fairly large one, perhaps 2,000 people, +nearly all enthusiastic Gladstonians, and the object was to +congratulate Mr. Gladstone on his adhering to principle in settling +the Russian quarrel by arbitration. I asked the Chairman to let me +move my resolution against the Soudan War, and with some difficulty +he consented, for it was not in the order of the day, and he +thought it might disturb the harmony of the occasion. But my speech +was a great success, and I carried my resolution almost +unanimously. It was as follows: ‘That this Meeting deplores the +renewal by Lord Wolseley of the war in the Soudan, and calls upon +Mr. Gladstone to fulfil his promise of peace by recalling Lord +Wolseley without delay, and opening friendly negotiations with the +Soudanese leaders.’ It was a bold move, but it succeeded, and I was +much congratulated after it; and several persons expressed to me +their sympathy with Arabi and their desire to have him back in +Egypt. I came back to London by the night train.</p> + +<p>“<em>9th May.</em>—Rode in the park, where Frederic Harrison +introduced me to Lord Dalhousie, with whom I talked about the +possibility of negotiating with the Mahdi. It seems he has Mr. +Gladstone’s ear, and it may do some good. I forgot to say that +yesterday I called on Middleton, the Conservative agent, and +arranged with him that I should stand for one of the Liverpool +wards, if he could arrange it<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_432">[432]</span> with the Conservatives there. I told him my +ideas freely, and he seemed quite reasonable; Randolph had seen him +and explained the whole position to him. So that thing is settled. +I don’t know whether I shall gain most or lose most by being in +Parliament, but I am determined, if I do get there, to lead the +Party in their foreign politics and about India.</p> + +<p>“<em>10th May.</em>—Randolph at the Carlton Club talked again +about my parliamentary prospects, and suggested Southwark as a +likely constituency. I hear, through John Pollen and Ripon, that it +is settled to evacuate the Soudan.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th May.</em>—A great and memorable Monday. The ‘Daily +News’ gave a hint this morning that things stood as John said +yesterday, and that the Government had resolved on a surrender. I +went early to Wentworth to arrange with him to move an amendment to +a motion Lord Wemyss is bringing on in the Lords about the Berber +Railway, and then to the Courtneys’. They seemed ignorant of any +pacific intention on the Government’s part; as also was, or +pretended to be, Morley, whom I met at half past twelve by +appointment at the House of Commons. I coached him in the speech he +was intending to make against a continuation of the war. But I +think now he must have been prepared for what was coming, though +probably not for all. Then at half-past four I went again to the +House, and was fortunate enough to find Edward Ponsonby, who gave +me the very best seat in the distinguished strangers’ gallery. From +this point of vantage I listened to every word. We were all +prepared for a surrender, but nobody dreamed of its being so +complete. Hartington had written his speech out beforehand and +delivered it plainly, even baldly, and I don’t know but what the +effect was better than if he<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_433">[433]</span> had used eloquence. At any rate we believed +him, as we should not have believed Mr. Gladstone. They are to +clear out of the Soudan, bag and baggage, at the very first rising +of the Nile; they are to abandon the Berber Railway and everything, +except just Suakin, till such times as they can make other +arrangements with a ‘civilized Power.’ Percy Wyndham asked a +question about this, and whether Suakin was not part of the Ottoman +Empire; and Gladstone gave him one of his roundabout answers: he +thought that Suakin was generally ‘conceived’ to belong to Turkey. +However, Hartington’s declaration was a great ministerial success, +and I went home feeling that at last I had won a real victory.</p> + +<p>“Dined with Lady C., who told me that Mr. Gladstone had been to +see her on Saturday, and she had attacked him on his wickedness in +killing the Arabs, and told him a number of home truths. He took it +all in good part however. She asked him what he thought of me, +saying we were friends. He answered that I was ‘personally a +charming person, but on politics mad.’ Mad people think others +mad.</p> + +<p>“<em>12th May.</em>—What Lady C. told me yesterday gave me the +fortunate inspiration to write to Downing Street to congratulate +Mr. Gladstone on the abandonment of the war, and to add a copy of +the new edition of my sonnets; and two hours later I got a reply +from Eddy, evidently in great good humour, saying that the gift was +appreciated, and Mr. Gladstone ‘would turn with pleasure from the +Soudan to Proteus.’ These little interchanges of courtesy in war +time are agreeable, and the Old Man appreciates them, looking on +all politics as he does in the light of a debating club.</p> + +<p>“Went to the Levee to-day for the first time for fifteen or +sixteen years. When it was over Staal<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_434">[434]</span> ran out after me and warmly entreated me to +come and see him. Down to Crabbet in high spirits.</p> + +<p>“<em>13th May.</em>—Ibrahim informed me yesterday that he had +received an invitation from the Sultan, conveyed to him through +Jowdat, to go to Constantinople and be one of his secretaries, and +he asked my advice about accepting. He said he was afraid of what +might happen, it was such a very risky thing, Court favour. I said +that, if he looked to his own interest he had better go and take +the chance, but that if he really had ideas of patriotism he had +better stay and be ready to carry a message when required to the +Mahdi. I could not advise him: he must judge for himself. He says +for the present he will stay.</p> + +<p>“To London, and called on Mrs. Howard, who is very angry at my +arrangement with Randolph. ‘You must expect no more sympathy,’ she +said, ‘in this house.’ However, we parted friends. George, whom I +met yesterday at the Levee, had told her about it. George says I am +right and rejoices, and says I shall ruin the Tory Party.</p> + +<p>“<em>15th May.</em>—Went down with Percy Wyndham to Hampton +Court to see the last day of the great tennis match between Lambert +and Petitt. It was worth any trouble to see, being quite a unique +occasion, and I suppose the tennis court at Hampton Court has not +for a hundred years seen such an assembly. Not only were the dedans +and side galleries filled, but the other galleries over the pent +houses had been fitted up with double rows of seats, all crammed. +The play, too, was probably the strongest, if not the best, ever +seen since tennis was invented. Curiously enough the young man’s +play, which has been described as more Lambertish than Lambert’s, +struck me as the less unclassic of the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_435">[435]</span> two. I have never admired Lambert’s style, +and Petitt has a really splendid stroke on the floor when he +chooses. In return Lambert was throughout over-matched, Petitt +having an astonishing judgement and precision. The game, however, +to eyes used to the French style, is spoilt by the perpetual +underhand service, which gives no scope to the first stroke; it +consisted in a succession of these with a boasted return—boasted +from the gallery wall. This is and must be ugly, but no other +return is possible. Arthur Balfour, Alfred Lyttelton, Heathcote, +and all the players and amateurs were there, and we came back in +the train with the little American who brought Petitt over, and who +told us Petitt’s history. He was a Sussex boy, perhaps Kent, and +had been merely engaged at fifteen to sweep out the court under one +Hulse at Boston. Hulse would not even let him play, and he taught +himself at odd moments. He never played with any one who could take +less than thirty from him till he came to England. All which makes +his success more miraculous. He is now twenty-four.</p> + +<p>“Dined with Settna and some Indians and Indian sympathisers, +Clark, Digby, Wood, Foggo, etc., at the National Liberal Club, +where we indulged in some rather wild talk about Indian reform.</p> + +<p>“<em>16th May.</em>—Button has come back from Ireland, and I am +glad of it, as I find it difficult to get on without him. He tells +me the Russian difficulty is not yet over. Randolph Churchill’s +violent letter, published yesterday in the ‘Times,’ was not a mere +hasty ebullition, but Randolph showed it about to his friends +before sending it in. These advised him to cut out the offensive +passages, but he deliberately left them in as he considered they +would tell with the electors.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_436">[436]</span>“Harrison tells +me that Gladstone explains his rejection of my offers of +negotiation by saying he does not believe those who made them +through me are really in communication with the Mahdi. Called on +Staal and talked the whole situation over with him. He tells me his +Government seems to be making new difficulties, more than he +himself thinks justified.</p> + +<p>“<em>17th May, Sunday.</em>—In my conversation with Staal +yesterday we discussed the Egyptian situation. He was very curious +to know if Mr. Gladstone was serious at last about evacuating the +Soudan; and I told him that he was,—as serious, that is, as he ever +is. ‘He is a great comedian,’ Staal said, ‘but I was shocked, when +he made his speech on Monday week, at his extraordinary statement +of the position on the Afghan frontier. And I don’t know what to +believe now about his intentions in Egypt. There are the three +questions of the Soudan, Egypt, and the Suez Canal. About Egypt, I +understand that it will eventually be neutralized; and so will the +Canal. But what will become of the Soudan?’ I said: ‘They will +certainly end by coming to terms with the Mahdi; there is no other +course.’ ‘But will not the Mahdi invade Egypt?’ ‘No, if you will +establish a popular government.’ He said he believed the European +Governments would be quite willing. About the Canal, he remarked, +the principal difficulty was who should garrison it. The Sultan +insisted upon doing this. I said it required no garrison more than +the Canal Company’s police; and as for the Sultan, ‘<em>On pourrait +passer outre</em>.’ This, to which he agreed, is certainly how it +will be arranged sooner or later.</p> + +<p>“Luncheon at Lady Dorothy Nevill’s. Drummond Wolff, Lord +Haddington, Jeune, and Ford, just<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_437">[437]</span> named Minister at Madrid. Randolph came in +late. Afterwards I looked in on Lothian,<a id= +"FNanchor_122"></a><a href="#Footnote_122" class= +"fnanchor">[122]</a> and tried to get him to take an interest in +negotiations with the Mahdi. His mind, however, is all in a muddle, +though he is well disposed on the main points; and as he is rather +a close friend of Lord Salisbury’s we may perhaps get something +from him in the debate in the Lords to-morrow. It seems odd to me +to be talking seriously with him on serious political questions +after all these years.</p> + +<p>“<em>18th May.</em>—Anne went to the Drawing Room. In the +afternoon Lord Wemyss brought on his Soudan motion in the House of +Lords, and Wentworth opposed it. Wentworth’s speech was good in +substance, but it rather unnecessarily jarred in tone upon the +noble Lords it was addressed to, and called down a thunderbolt from +the Duke of Argyll who followed. The Duke’s oration was splendid as +a work of art, well reasoned, eloquent in every mood, and most +impassioned. Though I did not agree with a word of the argument, I +could not help admiring him; but the whole discussion was, as +Wentworth said, academical, and will have no effect whatever on +public opinion. There is no possibility now of a conquest of +Africa, in the interests of civilization, being undertaken by +England; the only danger is from a commercial company, to support +which a promoter called upon me this afternoon. He thought I might +use my influence with Osman Digna to get him to help a railway to +Berber as a commercial speculation, but I of course declined to +have anything at all to do with it.</p> + +<p>“I dined after the debate, which we had listened<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_438">[438]</span> to together, with Percy +Wyndham at the Travellers. He encourages me much to go into +Parliament in support of Randolph, of whom he has a high opinion. +‘You two,’ he said, ‘if you will stick to your principle of telling +the truth at all cost, may yet save England.’ Only can I get into +Parliament really on my own terms? Philip Currie was dining at +another table, and I had some conversation with him about Egypt and +the Afghan question. He is very polite to me now, and urges me also +to go into Parliament. He is very scornful about the Government, +but I believe a good deal of the trouble has been due to his own +mismanagement at the Foreign Office.</p> + +<p>“<em>19th May.</em>—George Wyndham, I am glad to say, is ordered +home again from Suakin, and there is every reason to believe +nothing more will be done against the Arabs. Down to Crabbet and +dined with Locker at Rowfant. Harrison advises me to write what I +have to say about negotiation to Mr. Gladstone—and publish it.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th May.</em>—Dined at Francis Buxton’s, a Radical I like +particularly. He was very urgent I should stand for Parliament; +Cyril Flower said he could put me into a safe seat as a Radical. I +am like a donkey between two bundles of hay—very like the +donkey.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st May.</em>—Yesterday we had an Indian meeting in my +house to present Mr. Settna with an address on his return to India, +and it was turned into an address to myself by the Indians present. +I made them a speech in reply which was well received, and advised +them to agitate continually till they got their rights, as there +was no party in England which would do anything for them from any +other motive than fear. Some of them complained that Randolph +Churchill, whom I had been extolling as a sympathiser,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_439">[439]</span> had not said a word yet of his +desire to help them. And I wrote to him this morning, <em>à +propos</em> of a speech he made last night declaring for freedom in +Egypt and Ireland, and begged him to take an opportunity soon of +saying a word for India; and I met him this afternoon at the +Carlton Club, and he promised me to second Slagg’s motion for an +inquiry into the Indian Government. This is capital, and encourages +me to go on with him in earnest. Sir Robert Peel was there, very +amusing, both of them cutting their jokes at the old Tories. ‘There +won’t be half a dozen of them,’ Randolph said, ‘in the next +Parliament.’ He also declared he would contest Birmingham at all +hazards, and expressed his certainty of turning the Government out +at the elections. Now he is off to Paris for a run and to find out +what the new French policy is. The House adjourns to-morrow. Wagram +has arrived from Paris, looking for a house for the summer. We +dined together at St. James’s Club.</p> + +<p>“Mr. Egmont Hake called to-day to consult me on various points +connected with the ‘Gordon Diaries’ he is publishing. He admits +that Gordon made great mistakes at Khartoum, both as to men and +things. I have promised him a narrative of my efforts at +negotiation for his book.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd May, and later.</em>—Spent the day with Wagram looking +for houses at Ascot and Windsor. We drove through Windsor Park, +which is certainly the finest thing of its sort in the world. Then +down with him to Crabbet, where he spent Whitsuntide with us. +During the week there was absolutely no move on the political +chess-board except that the evacuation of Dongola is being hurried +on, and the evacuation of Suakin stayed—both in accordance with my +programme. Randolph has gone to Paris, where<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_440">[440]</span> Victor Hugo is dead; and Hartington and +Dilke to Ireland, where Healy is very much alive. There is an +absolute calm after the storm, and the only rock ahead is a threat +by Chamberlain of resignation on the Crimes Act.</p> + +<p>“<em>31st May.</em>—To London to get news. Button was away, and +London nearly empty, but by great luck I hit upon Gregory just +returned from Ireland, and Churchill just returned from Paris. I +met Gregory in the street, and we sat together for half an hour in +Hyde Park. He has seen Morley lately, and finds him quite ready to +go against Tewfik, and has put him in favour of Halim and Arabi’s +return. Morley quite admits now that it would have been possible to +get on with Arabi three years ago, and regrets the part he took +against him, which he excuses on the ground of wanting +information.</p> + +<p>“Churchill, whom I found at the Carlton Club, approves of a move +now in favour of Arabi, and advises me to make war on Ismaïl, whom +the ‘Pall Mall’ is working for. He also tells me Middleton, the +Conservative agent, is very keen about my joining the Party, and +promises to see that the matter of my candidature is settled soon. +He will come to Crabbet for a symposium I am proposing for one of +the Sundays of June or July. The persons to be invited are Staal, +Churchill, Morley, Lothian, Harrison, George Howard, Burt, Parnell, +Pembroke, Gregory, Stanley of Alderley, Percy Wyndham, Hobart, and +Morris. [This imagined party never came to anything on account of +the political upset which immediately afterwards happened. If I +remember rightly I did not even issue all the invitations.]</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd June.</em>—To London again for the day, but it is like +a city of the dead. The only person I saw was Mrs. Howard. She is +half inclined now to forgive<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_441">[441]</span> me my political errors, and has invited me +to Castle Howard for next month. She has been seeing something +lately of Chamberlain, whom she attacked about his orchid mania. +But he defends himself by saying he has had an horticultural +passion all his life; when he was a little boy he used to spend his +pennies in the market buying pots of daisies.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th June.</em>—Randolph has made a capital speech, with a +declaration of Conservative policy, including an inquiry into the +Government of India and a sort of Home Rule for Ireland. As regards +Egypt, he is for arranging matters with the Sultan, and retaining +with his consent the protection of Egypt. He is educating the Tory +Party, and I am educating him.</p> + +<p>“<em>5th June.</em>—Called on Middleton, the Conservative agent, +and told him I could accept Randolph’s programme almost as it +stood, and would write in that sense. He tells me there is a +difficulty about finding me a Conservative seat with my views on +Irish Home Rule. But he asked me to give him a little longer to +make inquiries. He still thinks there may be an opening at +Liverpool, or he might find me a place where I could stand as an +independent candidate with a Tory vote.</p> + +<p>“Dined with Whittaker at the Salisbury Club in St. James’s +Square. Hobart and his wife were there, and Villiers the +correspondent of the ‘Illustrated London News,’ just back from the +Nile campaign. Villiers gave me much interesting information. He +considers the campaign redounds greatly to Wolseley’s credit, and +the credit of all concerned. Like most correspondents he is more +warlike than any soldier, would have eaten the Arabs’ livers if he +could, and has been in all the battles. At the same time he says +the power of the Mahdi is quite unbroken.<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_442">[442]</span> The Mahdi is a man of genius and has never +made a mistake, and his movement is the most important there has +ever been in Africa. I asked him about the reported losses of Arabs +in battle, and he said they had been absurdly exaggerated. He knew +how generals liked to make big things out of small ones, and he was +quite sure, from first to last and including both campaigns at +Suakin and the Nile, the total Arab loss was under 5,000. This has +consoled me much. He was at Tamaï last year when the British square +was broken, and he is sure there were not above 600 Arabs who made +the charge, nor more than 5,000 altogether opposed to Graham.</p> + +<p>“About Sir Charles Wilson’s delay in reaching Khartoum, he said +that Wilson’s fault, if any, was in not pushing home the attack on +Metemmeh. He had attacked Metemmeh, meaning to take it, but found +the place too strong, and after the repulse it would have been very +imprudent to send the steamers away directly, as it would have +invited attack on the camp. Metemmeh, therefore, and Shendi had to +be shelled; Khartoum could have been taken by the Arabs at any +time. The Intelligence Department had been wrong throughout. +Villiers seems an intelligent fellow, and, as I have said, a +fire-eating warrior. So his evidence goes for much. He told me it +was certainly true that a reward of £50 had been offered for +Olivier Pain, dead or alive. It was Wolseley issued it, ‘and quite +right too, the man being a soldier of fortune.’ He himself would +have been ‘delighted to put a bullet through him, and drag him into +camp by the heels.’ Such are the amenities of ‘war which is not +war.’</p> + +<p>“<em>6th June.</em>—Luncheon in Belgrave Square. George Wyndham +has written from Suakin, very angry with<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_443">[443]</span> me for saying in the ‘Times’ that money had +been paid for dead Arabs’ hands. Only one hand had been brought in, +and it was not of a dead but of a live Arab whom they had gone out +and brought in alive to camp, and nothing was paid for the hand. +But that does not prevent C. from having done the thing last year. +Met Harry Brand in Piccadilly and walked with him up Bond Street. I +told him I thought Randolph the only man who would push reform. But +he said the Government would be in for ever, they would get a +majority of fifty more than they had now after the elections. To a +great party at the Foreign Office for the Queen’s birthday.</p> + +<p>“<em>8th June.</em>—Crabbet. I have finished my letter to +Randolph (the one intended for publication as a manifesto of my +opinions), and have written to him to say I will bring it him +to-morrow. He has made another wonderful speech at Cambridge. I am +convinced he will carry the Tory Party through at the +elections.</p> + +<p>“<em>9th June.</em>—This morning the astonishing news came of +the Government’s defeat on the Budget. Nobody at all expected it, +and it looks very like a put-up business. People in London, +however, say the reason is that the Whigs and Radicals have got +rusty about voting, having been sent for so often to defend motions +of censure, and now they did not believe in the danger. Anyhow, the +Government are out, and the Carlton Club is agog with delight.</p> + +<p>“I went up by the early train to London, and my first visit was +to Randolph, the hero of the moment (whom I found still in bed). I +must say there never was a man with his head turned less by success +than he. We talked for half an hour, and he read me a very curious +letter which arrived while I was with him from Lepel Griffin. It +contained a scheme of<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_444">[444]</span> policy for Afghanistan which was briefly +this: The Amir’s reception at Rawal Pindi has been a failure and a +mistake; too much fuss had been made with him, and it had offended +the other native princes. Scindia had said it was ridiculous, and +the Maharajah of Cashmere had refused to come. None of the princes +of India were really loyal, except the Punjabis. The rest disliked +us, ‘though,’ said Griffin, ‘I made the most of their loyalty in my +article to encourage them.’ His article was one about the native +army. His scheme for Afghanistan was this: he would come to an +understanding with Russia for its partition, making over to her the +Turcoman provinces and keeping Candahar and Kabul with the Hindoo +Kush for a frontier. This was, I remember, exactly Lytton’s scheme +of securing a ‘scientific frontier.’ Griffin, however, would give +Constantinople to Russia. To this Randolph objected, but he +approved of keeping Candahar, or rather of taking it. I dissuaded +him, however, strongly from meddling with the Afghans, and offered +to find out from Jemal-ed-Din in what way we could make friends +with them, and who would be the most popular Amir to succeed +Abd-el-Rahman, if, as Randolph said was likely soon, he should +die.</p> + +<p>“We then talked about the prospects of a change of Government, +and he told me the Conservatives would take office and that all had +been arranged. But they did not wish it known, and had sent word to +the ‘Pall Mall’ that they did not mean to come in. Randolph counts +on having a voice in Foreign Affairs, and he asked me whether I +would go on a mission to the Mahdi. I said I would if sent as a +regular envoy. Also there will be no coercion in Ireland. He read +my letter, which I had brought with me, and approved of it all. ‘I +agree with it all,’ he said;<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_445">[445]</span> but he asked me to leave out the words +‘Home Rule’ in what I said about Ireland, and insert the words +‘than you <em>apparently</em> are <em>yet</em> prepared for.’ He +also assured me he was keeping Middleton up to the mark about my +candidature, and again recommended Southwark. We agreed that I +should send my letter to the ‘Times’ to-night for publication.</p> + +<p>“Then to Button in the City, and arranged about publishing the +letter; and then to Mrs. Howard. She dined last night with +Hartington and Granville and Bright, and assured me they had been +all as merry and unconscious of danger as men could be. Bright told +her he was at the Cabinet which decided on the bombardment of +Alexandria; but Lord Granville had assured him that it would not +really take place, and it had long ago been settled that he was to +leave the Cabinet on the first shot fired in any war. It had been a +cause of grief and tears with him to watch the slaughter which had +since occurred, but he had not had the heart to stand up and +denounce his former friends. He had, however, written to Mr. +Gladstone after the war to say that if he allowed Arabi to be tried +by the Egyptian Government it would be a ‘lasting infamy.’ I am +asked to Castle Howard for 21st July.</p> + +<p>“Back to Crabbet. We have arranged two parties: one for Staal on +the 27th, the other for Randolph on the 4th. Staal did not fancy +meeting Randolph, so we have asked them for separate days. Also a +third for the Club on the 11th of July.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th June.</em>—Anniversary of the Alexandria riots. Arabi +is very nearly now avenged. I shall send a copy of my letter to +Randolph to Lothian, that he may show it to Lord Salisbury, who +will probably have the Foreign Office. Barring accidents, we must +win now; at least we have gained this—Granville<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_446">[446]</span> will <em>never</em> be in +office again till time shall be no more.</p> + +<p>“To London. Harry Brand professes himself in high delight at +being out of office, and I fancy there was a little hocus-pocus in +the Government defeat. To Coombe, where we saw ‘As You Like It’ +acted in the open air. I cannot call it a success; I dislike +Shakespeare on the stage, and especially his comedies. His +long-winded Elizabethan jokes after these three hundred years are +inexpressibly flat, and this ‘As You Like It’ is full of them. Then +the open-air representation gave only the forest scenes, and was a +bit monotonous. I doubt if anything is gained by its being out of +doors. The <em>coup d’œil</em> was pretty enough, but in no way +reminded one of a forest, and the actors looked even less real than +on a regular stage. The place chosen was no part of Coombe Wood, +but a suburban garden with lime trees, pretty but tame. The ground, +littered with dry fern, looked like a farmyard, and the actors, +wading about in it, out of place and a trifle absurd. The acting +was ordinary English acting, that is to say bad—mostly +professional. Lady Archie’s<a id="FNanchor_123"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_123" class="fnanchor">[123]</a> was certainly the best; +she is a tall, graceful woman, with a good stage voice, and made +herself well heard. These are my criticisms, but the day was +perfect—chequered sunlight and shade, with birds singing, and I +enjoyed it very much.</p> + +<p>“Dined with Anne at the Russian Embassy. A pleasant family +dinner, nobody there but ourselves, a secretary, and Monsieur de +Lessar. We talked the political situation over freely, and my +impression is that Lord Salisbury will have trouble in finishing +the Afghan frontier dispute. Staal is evidently much roughed up, +especially against Randolph; and when<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_447">[447]</span> I asked him whether he would like to meet +him at Crabbet he said he would rather not. He would, however, like +to meet some Conservatives of position; so I have asked Lothian and +Pembroke. We talked about Madame de Novikof, and he acknowledged +that she had been very useful to Russian diplomacy. There was talk +also about Ismaïl in a tone which convinces me that Ismaïl is the +Russian candidate. There is a Christian conspiracy against Islam +here in England, consisting of Madame de Novikof, Stead, and Ismaïl +as the Sultan’s chief enemy. Staal said to me: ‘What they reproach +you with is that having been against the Sultan you have now gone +over to him.’ He must have got this from these three.</p> + +<p>“<em>12th June.</em>—My letter to Randolph is in the ‘Times.’ I +have sent copies of it to Lucknow, Bombay, Colombo, and +Constantinople; also to Sanua and Jemal-ed-Din.<a id= +"FNanchor_124"></a><a href="#Footnote_124" class= +"fnanchor">[124]</a></p> + +<p>“<em>14th June, Sunday.</em>—Crabbet. The ‘Observer’ has a list +of the new Cabinet, which, if true, would suit me well. Randolph at +the India Office, Northcote, Foreign Affairs; no mention of +Pembroke, however, whom I met on Friday looking very mysterious, as +people do who have been talked to about a place but are not sure of +getting it.</p> + +<p>“<em>16th June.</em>—Randolph has made a new row, voting against +Northcote with Beach and others. I suppose Lord Salisbury has not +recognized the claims and policy of the Fourth Party; it is +unfortunate, as it seems to jeopardize the Conservative chance. But +I daresay Randolph is right; he is the only man capable of leading +the Tories to victory. Lady C. writes that the Prince of Wales is +highly pleased with my letter to Randolph.</p> + +<p>“<em>17th June.</em>—Randolph was right and he has +won,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_448">[448]</span> and nothing he +has done yet has given me so high an idea of his genius as a +leader. He has brought Lord Salisbury to his own terms. Stafford +Northcote is to go to the Lords, and Beach is to lead the Commons +as Randolph’s lieutenant. All the old generals are to be put on the +pension list, and the young fellows to command the battle. This +will give the Tory Party a chance at the elections: it would have +had none under Northcote. With Randolph at the India Office and, +who knows, Drummond Wolff Under-Secretary for Foreign Affairs, I +ought to be able to pull through my programme. At the Radical +meeting last night, at St. James’s Hall, Vernon Harcourt +incautiously mentioned Arabi’s name, and it was received with +vociferous cheering.</p> + +<p>“<em>18th June.</em>—In London. Just saw Randolph at the Carlton +Club and congratulated him. But he said: ‘It is not a case for +congratulations yet. Nothing is settled.’ The old fogies at the +Carlton are in a great taking about Lord Salisbury having accepted +office, and are putting pressure on him to back out of it. It seems +there are negotiations going on with Gladstone to know whether he +will support the Conservatives on the Budget and other matters, and +it is doubtful which way it will go. I had a long talk with +Leconfield, who expressed the usual idea—rather frightened at +Randolph—would sooner not come into office. Pembroke the same. I am +all for a bold course, the only one to win the elections.</p> + +<p>“Back to Crabbet; I shall stay here till the crisis is over.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd June.</em>—Had a talk with Ferid Bey, first secretary +of the Turkish Embassy, who came down to Crabbet. He is very +anxious to find out what Lord Salisbury’s policy is likely to be. I +sketched to him my idea of a settlement for Egypt; but it +is<span class="pagenum" id="Page_449">[449]</span> clear the Turks +have but one notion, to get Egypt back ‘after the manner of Syria,’ +which, Ferid says, is ‘so well governed.’ I explained to him, +however, that, unless they could get rid of the debt, they could +not get rid of European influence, and for that reason the Sultan +must act in concert with some solvent Power, which could guarantee +the interest of the loans, and so undertake a joint protection. +This could only be England. Acting together, peace could easily be +restored in Egypt by the Sultan’s appointment of a new Viceroy.</p> + +<p>“Lord Salisbury is to come into office. Lothian, whom I met at +the Carlton Club, told me it was settled this afternoon. I talked +to him about Eastern policy and Lord Salisbury’s foreign policy. He +tells me the great difficulty with Lord Salisbury is that he is a +very shy man, and hardly ever mixes with people out of his own set, +so that he does not know the real turn opinion is taking. Also, +with regard to Egypt, it will be difficult to get him to go against +his words. He was strongly against Arabi before the war, and has +always taken the line that the Government’s fault was that it did +not put him down soon enough. There will be the difficulty. Lothian +is coming down to Crabbet next Sunday and we shall then know more +about it. In the meanwhile I have written to Jemal-ed-Din, begging +him to hold himself in readiness to come over here should he be +wanted. The Wagrams have arrived in London.</p> + +<p>“<em>23rd June.</em>—Sure enough Lord Salisbury is in office. +There is talk of Drummond Wolff going to Egypt in Evelyn Baring’s +place. At the Carlton I found Middleton, who tells me the +Conservatives of Southwark will probably ask me to stand for their +division at the elections, and if I can make sure of<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_450">[450]</span> the Irish vote I shall +certainly be elected. This sounds well. To a party at Lady Ripon’s, +where I met divers Radicals—Lyulph Stanley, the Courtneys, Sir +George Campbell, and others, all very angry at Randolph’s success. +There were Indians there too, but these were quite willing to take +him as an acquisition; he would be better in any case than +Kimberley. The great advantage Randolph has as a reformer is that +he has no respect at all for any one older than himself; and I +expect when he gets strong in his seat after the elections he will +turn the old Indian Council into the street. They say now at the +India Office that they know how to manage him, but we shall see. +Amongst others at the party was the Duke of Argyll, to whom I was +introduced. I began at once with him about his Soudan speech in the +House of Lords, and we had a quarter of an hour’s argument, during +the course of which I told him that the only civilization he was +likely to bring to the Arabs was brandy and venereal diseases. It +is difficult to keep one’s temper with the Duke of Argyll, he is so +dictatorial and <em>cassant</em> in his manner—the very rudest man +I ever talked to. Forster joined us, and I went away without +finishing the conversation.</p> + +<p>“<em>25th June.</em>—Robert Bourke is appointed Undersecretary +for Foreign Affairs, and I have written to congratulate him. This +is a very distinct gain. Also Drummond Wolff goes to Egypt, and +Baring is to be recalled. Thus I have many friends in office, for +Arthur Balfour also gets a place and Sidney Herbert.</p> + +<p>“Called on Button in his new rooms in Northumberland Avenue. He +is standing for Clapham. He tells me the Conservatives mean now to +pay no attention at all to votes in the House, to be silent in face +of resolutions, and if supply is refused to carry<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_451">[451]</span> on the Government without it +till the elections. They will keep quiet about their foreign policy +till the recess, and then they will act vigorously. Drummond Wolff +is being sent out as a stop-gap, ‘to report.’ Baring will certainly +be recalled. Eventually the Egyptian question will be settled in +accord with the Sultan. Bismarck will support England. They are +talking of Lytton for Constantinople, but I advised his going to +Vienna and sending Paget to Constantinople. Called also on Percy +Wyndham, who is much interested in the way things are turning and +my election prospects. I regret immensely that he should be leaving +Parliament at the very moment when the outlook is brighter and he +likely to be appreciated.</p> + +<p>“Lunched at the Alfred Lytteltons—George Curzon, Godfrey Webb, +and others there. Met Eddy Hamilton in fine feather coming out of +Lord Granville’s. He has been made a C. B., which he acknowledges, +and given Welby’s place at the Treasury, which he does not +acknowledge.</p> + +<p>“To Drummond Wolff’s daughter’s wedding; the bridesmaids in +yellow, representing the Primrose League. Then to Fulham Palace, +where Bee Lascelles, now Mrs. Bishop Temple, was holding a clerical +levee, the garden ‘crawling alive’ with parsons like an ant’s nest. +I escaped to a side alley, feeling out of my element, and ran up +against Frederick Leveson, who had fled there from the same motive. +We had not met since the bombardment of Alexandria, but he was glad +to find any one to say ‘How do you do’ to. ‘You are the first +layman I have met here,’ he said; ‘it is like a scene out of +Trollope.’</p> + +<p>“Dined at Frederic Harrison’s and sat next Lord Justice Bowen, +and talked over Lord Randolph’s<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_452">[452]</span> character. I think I can see the Radicals +are getting a bit uneasy at Randolph’s leadership. If he can +succeed in striking terror in the enemy, confidence will come to +our people and we shall carry the day. Randolph has written, asking +me to call on him at the India Office early next week, which is a +sign of good things. They all say he will change now he is in +office, but we shall see. His note was in answer to one of mine, +telling him that Godley was a friend, and asking him to look up the +cases of the Civil Service examinations and Holkar’s claim. Both +these requests were suggested to me by Pollen on Lord Ripon’s +behalf. Lord Ripon supported both cases, but was thrown over by +Lord Kimberley.</p> + +<p>“Gordon’s Diaries are out. They are excellent reading, and he +pitches into Malet and Colvin and Dilke to my heart’s content.</p> + +<p>“<em>27th June.</em>—A party at Crabbet—the Staals and Wagrams, +Harry Brand, Stanley of Alderley, and Lothian. I have had much talk +with Lothian about the new Conservative policy in Egypt, and have +urged him to press on Lord Salisbury the necessity of very careful +dealing with the matter, as it is one which might very easily be +bungled. It is curious having Lothian down here for the first time +after so many years that we have known each other intimately. I +find Staal much more peaceably inclined towards the present +Ministry. He quite understands Churchill’s irresponsibility. He +seems to distrust Salisbury the more of the two. ‘Now they are in +office,’ he said, ‘I shall have to be friends with them.’</p> + +<p>“<em>28th June, Sunday.</em>—Button came down, riding from +London, and we played lawn tennis. Button rather disquiets me in +what he says of Lord Salisbury’s intention in Egypt. He has +counter-ordered the evacuation of Dongola, and Harry Brand +talks<span class="pagenum" id="Page_453">[453]</span> of an +expedition to Khartoum as an easy matter. I am afraid they may be +tempted to humour Wolseley.</p> + +<p>“I have been reading Gordon’s journals, and find him perpetually +calling for Turkish troops. To the last he seems to have underrated +his enemy, both physically and morally. What strikes me most in +these journals is Gordon’s inability to see the far higher moral +standing ground of his opponents. I doubt if he understood the +letters sent him; they were probably not translated to him fairly, +and he never would see any of the Mahdi’s men himself. If he had +gone to the Mahdi he could not have blinded himself to the +elevation of the position the Mahdi claimed as socialistic +reformer, and he is content to repeat tales, told him by Greeks and +other scoundrels, of the Mahdi putting pepper under his nails to +promote tears, and other like absurdities. If ever right triumphed +in the world it was at the fall of Khartoum. At the same time the +journals make out a far stronger case for Gordon as against the +Government than I could have expected.</p> + +<p>“<em>30th June.</em>—To London, to see Randolph at the India +Office. He had just been attending his first council and seemed a +little oppressed at the weight of work before him. But he soon +cheered up, and talked with his old frankness and fun about his +plans: ‘I am doing all I can now,’ he said, ‘of course to humour +the people in the Office and get them friendly. But they are very +slow, and I can see will prove obstructive. The Secretary of State, +however, can always insist, if he chooses, on having his own way; +and I mean to have mine. We must do things by degrees. If I was to +offer to re-open the question of the Civil Service examinations +straight off there would be a howl all over the Office. But I mean +to carry<span class="pagenum" id="Page_454">[454]</span> the +Queen’s Proclamation into practice, and see that the natives get +admitted into the services. I can tell them that through you, but +can do no more for the present.’</p> + +<p>“I asked him about Holkar’s claim. This he professed himself +quite ready to support. ‘Dufferin has promised me,’ he said, ‘not +to put the settlement of this matter into Durand’s hands. All my +sympathies are with Holkar.’ I told him about Staal’s visit and the +prospects of peace with Russia, and advised him to have as little +to do with the Afghans as he could help. But we did not discuss the +subject at length. Then we went on to Egypt, and he said: ‘I am +very anxious you should see Drummond Wolff without delay. Drummond +Wolff is very keen to work in the way we want, and I am beginning +to get Lord Salisbury round to our ideas. Lord Salisbury and I are +on the best possible terms; like father and son,’ he said with a +queer smile. Also he went on: ‘I told Lord Salisbury we should have +to get rid of Tewfik the other day, and it quite startled him. He +never seems to have thought of it before, but I think he will come +to it; we must do it little by little. My idea about Egypt is—only +you must promise me you will not repeat it, for if it was to get +about it would spoil everything—that Tewfik should be deposed by +the Sultan, and his son put up under English guardianship. We would +then recall Arabi, at first as a simple citizen,—afterwards, when +we saw how it did, as Minister. But there must be a protectorate.’ +I said: ‘Why not call it something else, an alliance?’ ‘No,’ he +said, ‘I think it best to call a spade a spade. We will call it +what it is, a protectorate.’ I said: ‘You will require very +delicate handling to get the Sultan to do exactly what you want. He +is difficult to deal with and a little mad; and +whatever<span class="pagenum" id="Page_455">[455]</span> is done +should be through his initiative.’ To this he entirely agreed.</p> + +<p>“He then asked about Dongola and Suakin, whether it would not be +best to get the Sultan to occupy them with his troops. With regard +to Suakin, I said: ‘Certainly, yes; but not Dongola. Any troops +left at Dongola would certainly be attacked.’ And I strongly advise +him to accept Lord Granville’s line of Wady Halfa as the boundary +of Egypt. If he did so there was very little chance of Egypt being +invaded this year. A joint occupation with the Turks in Lower Egypt +would be a smaller risk, but I would not advise it. The Sultan’s +intervention should be a moral one. Randolph is keen also to make +peace with the Mahdi, which he said would be a feather in their +caps before the election. And he approved the idea of Ibrahim going +as forerunner to prepare my way before me. I am to talk all this +over, however, with Drummond Wolff when he returns from Woodstock +on Saturday, and afterwards see Lord Salisbury. ‘You need not +mind,’ he said, ‘putting yourself forward in this matter; you are +an authority on Egypt and have a right to be heard.’ Nothing could +have been more satisfactory than all this conversation. With regard +to Ismaïl, Randolph spoke very strongly: ‘I will never consent,’ he +said, ‘to his restoration. I should consider it a personal disgrace +to be connected with the restoration of such a scoundrel. As to +Halim I know nothing, and I prefer Tewfik’s boy with a Regency.’ I +promised to be secret on all he had told me, and to act in concert +with him and Drummond Wolff, and I have written to Wolff to propose +seeing him Monday or Tuesday.</p> + +<p>“<em>1st July.</em>—The ‘Times’ opens fire at Drummond Wolff, +and I fear may spoil our sport, so I have<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_456">[456]</span> written a short letter about the charges +against the Khedive, and have sent it to Churchill to know whether +he approves its publication. I am for attacking Tewfik now; if they +commit themselves with him they will never get rid of him. The +‘Morning Post’ has an article in favour of Ismaïl. Randolph has +sent back word, through Hope (my private secretary), that if I had +written my letter a fortnight ago he would have approved it; now he +cannot approve it. So I have kept back the letter; it is useless +fighting the battle by myself.</p> + +<p>“To Argyll Lodge, where I had another talk with the Duke, but in +more amicable terms. All the same, it is an uncomfortable house to +visit, through the absurd pride of its inhabitants.</p> + +<p>“<em>3rd July.</em>—Wrote to Robert Bourke giving an account of +my correspondence with Downing Street about the Mahdi.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th and 5th July, Sunday.</em>—Our annual Lawn Tennis +meeting; those present were Eddy Hamilton, Wentworth, Frederic +Harrison, Elcho, Jack Napier, Mark Napier, Kingscote, Sandys, +Seymour, Mallock, Farquhar, Button, and George Dallas.</p> + +<p>“Button tells me Randolph has been a great success at the India +Office; he has also won his election at Woodstock most +triumphantly, and the party prospects are good. Not so I fear those +of Egypt. Button talks of their keeping on Tewfik there ‘for a +year.’ If so, he will be kept on altogether.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th July.</em>—Saw Drummond Wolff at the Carlton Club. He +tells me he is going to Constantinople before he goes to Cairo, +which is as it should be. He is annoyed at the set made at him in +the ‘Times,’ and I explained to him that ‘a Twenty Years’ Resident’ +was none other than our friend Moberly<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_457">[457]</span> Bell. He asked me about the possibility of +treating with the Mahdi, and I have agreed to bring Jemal-ed-Din +from Paris to talk things over with him. We are to have another and +more serious discussion of the Egyptian business as soon as he has +seen Lord Salisbury.</p> + +<p>“Saw Middleton, the Tory agent, who tells me my name is the only +one before the Conservatives of Southwark, and they will probably +choose me as their candidate. But there are certain ‘fossilized +Tories’ who are suspicious of me.</p> + +<p>“Down to Coombe Wood to see Mrs. Batten act Amaryllis in ‘The +Faithful Shepherdess.’ As a <em>féerie</em> it was pretty, much +prettier than ‘As You Like It.’ Mrs. Batten looked very well, but +the best was a little Indian lady, calling herself the Princess +Helen of Kappartalla, very pretty, very graceful, and clever. The +piece, like the other, was spoilt by the professionals. When it was +over I stopped to dine with Bertram Currie [N.B.—He was member of +the Indian Council], whose house was close by. Bertram gave me an +account of Randolph’s first council at the India Office, which took +place on Tuesday just before I saw him. Bertram’s account was that +he was much frightened and said nothing, absolutely nothing. To +him, Bertram, he was very humble in a private interview afterwards: +‘There is one thing,’ Randolph had said, ‘of which I am profoundly +ignorant, and that is finance.’ And so he will be humble till the +day he feels his legs and can strike them. According to Button, he +has held the same language with Ashley Eden and Rawlinson and all +of them.</p> + +<p>“<em>7th July.</em>—Lord Salisbury has made his statement about +Egypt, which is far from satisfactory, inasmuch as he engages +himself to support Tewfik. It makes a true settlement once more +impossible.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_458">[458]</span> +Nothing, however, can be done but to accept the position, and I +shall not move further in the matter till I am in Parliament. There +are difficulties at Southwark, which wants a ‘fossilized Tory’; +still, Middleton thinks it all right. If I don’t get in this time I +shall leave English politics alone, as I am too old to wait for +another chance. Perhaps it will be better so, and in any case I +leave it to God’s providence for good or for evil.</p> + +<p>“<em>8th July.</em>—To a political meeting at East Grinstead, +where I made my maiden speech as a Conservative. This commits me to +party politics, a thing I have avoided all my life.</p> + +<p>“<em>9th July.</em>—Ibrahim has received a letter from +Jemal-ed-Din hinting that, if nothing is done in Egypt in the sense +we hope for from Randolph, he will go off to Afghanistan to raise +up trouble against England. I have consequently written to Wolff, +urging him to get Lord Salisbury to commence negotiations with the +Mahdi and sending him my correspondence with Downing Street.<a id= +"FNanchor_125"></a><a href="#Footnote_125" class= +"fnanchor">[125]</a></p> + +<p>“Dined at the Gaskells with Anne, and took in Lady Iddesleigh, +late Lady Northcote,<a id="FNanchor_126"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_126" class="fnanchor">[126]</a> and she questioned me +closely about the Mahdi and the Sultan and Arabi; and afterwards I +had some conversation, and Anne had more, with her husband, who is +now Foreign Secretary. Lady Iddesleigh professed great sympathy +with Arabi, and with my ideas generally of a settlement. She also +said she thought it would be a good thing to get Tewfik to retire +on an honourable pension. She is a chatty old woman of the +old-fashioned sort, and talked nicely and simply of her pleasure in +Sir Stafford’s being made an earl. His relations had always looked +for a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_459">[459]</span> peerage for +him, and an earldom of Iddesleigh had long been an extreme +ambition. His lordship seems to have talked in much the same strain +to Anne about Egypt, and I augur well of their willingness to +converse. My taking Lady Iddesleigh in to dinner was evidently +pre-arranged, as it was not properly my place.</p> + +<p>“The Mahdi’s death is reported, and the arrival of Huseyn +Khalifa at Alexandria to tender submission to Tewfik. But Ibrahim +says he must have brought a summons to the Khedive to become a +Moslem.</p> + +<p>“<em>13th July.</em>—Went to see Wolseley arrive from Egypt at +Victoria Station. There was no great crowd, perhaps two hundred +persons on the platform and three hundred outside. There was a +feeble attempt at cheering from his friends, and I heard a few +hoots, certainly no enthusiasm. Wolseley looked older than when he +went away, and rather careworn. Last time he came back from Egypt +it was for a ridiculous triumph down Pall Mall, with the Grand Old +Man waving his handkerchief like a madman from a window, fresh from +Tel-el-Kebir. Now he drives away from the station with half a dozen +little boys running after his carriage. I like him better as he is. +I should like best of all to see him hanged.</p> + +<p>“<em>14th July.</em>—To Middleton’s at twelve o’clock to hear my +fate at Southwark. I don’t think it has been Middleton’s fault, but +the Southwark electors at a meeting last night were told I was an +out and out Home Ruler, and that frightened them out of their wits, +and they have selected another candidate. I see nothing for it but +to put up with the disappointment. My failure to get into +Parliament will put an end to my political career, as I have pretty +well exhausted the good I can do with letter writing in the +‘Times,’ and require a new weapon.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_460">[460]</span>“<em>16th +July.</em>—A deputation has come to me from Camberwell, which has +been offered to me instead of Southwark. I told them very frankly +what my position and views were: that I was a Roman Catholic and +Home Ruler in Ireland, but a devout believer in Randolph and Church +and State in England. They asked me whether I was in favour of Fair +Trade and duties on imported manufactures. And I said that if the +Conservative Government proposed such duties I would support them; +but I was not clear how Fair Trade would work. They asked next +about Sir Wilfrid Lawson’s Local Option. I said I had no intention +of voting for it. This is the only point on which I have had a +doubt, but I think I am not called upon to vote for this particular +Bill. After all, England is a Christian country and must have its +beer.</p> + +<p>“On Ireland they were at first a little staggered by my using +the word ‘Home Rule,’ but I said I preferred to call a spade a +spade; and I believed the Irish were right in asking a separate +Parliament; they did not wish for a complete separation. But I was +an advocate for the right of nations to govern themselves, and I +could make no exception about Ireland. On the School Board quarrel +I was entirely with them; and I think it a real good fortune for me +to have this particular cause to defend of religious education, for +it is one I wholly sympathize with, and it is of a piece with my +Mohammedan teaching in India. Finally, after an hour and a half’s +talk, we parted mutually satisfied, and I am to attend a local +meeting this day week and give my final answer. I am to pay my own +expenses, but they have promised me an easy time of it in the way +of work.</p> + +<p>“This settled, I went at once to Randolph at the India Office +and told him all, and agreed with him<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_461">[461]</span> that he should write a letter to the +Camberwell Committee congratulating them on their choice of me as +candidate. I found Randolph very cheerful: ‘They will never make an +official of <em>me</em>,’ he said, with a funny smile. We talked +about Egypt: ‘Tewfik,’ I said, ‘will be a terrible handicap to Lord +Salisbury’s programme; but I suppose you are obliged to keep him.’ +‘We shall see about that,’ he answered; ‘only we must have +patience. Drummond Wolff is the man to get it done through.’ Then +he asked about Arabi, whether I would answer for him as honest, and +he would work with us in an honest way; and I said ‘he would for +the good of the country, but not to prepare the way for +annexation.’ About his own department he told me he was in great +trouble to know what sort of game the Amir was playing in +Afghanistan, and he asked me to try and get him information. And I +offered to bring Jemal-ed-Din from Paris, and talk that matter and +Egypt over with him. He was much pleased at this, and said he would +see him at my house. I expect the India Office people are a bit +frightened at my coming to see Randolph, but they are extremely +polite to me.</p> + +<p>“Later I met Wolff at the Carlton Club. He wanted to know +whether Arabi would come back to serve under Tewfik, and whether he +would serve with Sherif or Nubar. I said I would find out, and I +have written to Arabi asking him, and begging him to telegraph +‘Yes’ or ‘No.’ Wolff also wanted to hear about the Mahdi. ‘Lord +Salisbury will hear what Wolseley and Baring have to say,’ he said, +‘but he won’t necessarily do what they advise; and if he wishes, he +will make peace with the Mahdi in spite of them.’ I promised Wolff +to introduce some people at Constantinople who could be of use +there. All this sounds well. Then I saw Huntley +McCarthy<span class="pagenum" id="Page_462">[462]</span> and +arranged with him about the Camberwell Irish, of whom there seem to +be a thousand or so. [N.B.—This was a great exaggeration.] And then +to Cardinal Manning, who gave me his best wishes and promised to +write to the Camberwell priest.</p> + +<p>“<em>18th July.</em>—To Castle Howard, travelling in company +with Mrs. Morris. In the carriage with us were the Speaker, his +wife, and daughter. We arrived at Castle Howard in floods of rain, +which made it look gloomy enough. But the site of the house is +good, the chief block quite perfect, and the inside a gem. Since +the house has been built, however, I suppose it has never been +treated in such a way as it is now; everything is cut down to the +barest necessity of existence: no one to open the gates at the +lodges, not a servant to be seen except at meals, and no footman +with the carriage. The gardens are neglected—they look the better +for it; and the park has been railed off and is being mown for hay. +On the other hand, I doubt if the house ever was cheerfuller. There +were some twenty children and young persons under twenty in it, and +there was a deal of boating on the large pond and tennis on the +lawns. The only person to receive us at the door was Mrs. Howard. +She has made up some rooms for herself in one of the wings, but the +whole house is occupied from one end to the other. The men staying +here are tutors or undergraduates, friends of Charley’s, and all is +essentially <em>bourgeois</em> and communistic. I like it the +better.</p> + +<p>“<em>19th July, Sunday.</em>—George took me round the house and +showed me the pictures. They are an admirable collection, good +specimens of every school. The Velasquez of two children, an +Infanta and a Dwarf, is, I think, the most remarkable; and there is +a very interesting picture of Newmarket in the<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_463">[463]</span> reign of Queen Anne, which shows the +horses of the day to have been big sixteen hand horses, with heads +of the Spanish type. There are some good marbles too, and the rooms +are finely decorated. Mrs. Howard talks of doing away with the +formal parterres in front of the house, but I have persuaded her +that this would be sacrilege. She is very angry with me for having +put on Tory armour for the election, or rather Radical armour for +the Tory cause, and especially for going against the School Board, +of which she and her mother and brother Lyulph are fierce +champions.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th July.</em>—Mary Howard’s birthday, and I wrote her a +sonnet. She is a wonderful child with her philanthropies, and has +been founding a society of girls in the neighbouring villages for +their mutual good and the furtherance of virtue. She preaches to +them for an hour and an hour and a half at the time, and has got +together about a hundred of them. She has genius and beauty and a +blameless heart, and is of the sort which might convert a world. +The sonnet has pleased the child, who is ready for all martyrdom. +In the afternoon she entertained her village friends with a +concert, and made them a little speech afterwards, very simply and +nicely. I know nobody else who could do this without ridicule.</p> + +<p>“I have been avenging myself for the political anger I have +aroused in the house by writing my Tory democratic electoral +address, and by threatening to date it from Castle Howard.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st July.</em>—A bright day at last, and the place has +changed as if by magic, for it is dependent on the sun for its +charms. Mrs. Howard took me for a drive of four hours, visiting +village parsons, in pursuance of a scheme she has for giving +holidays<span class="pagenum" id="Page_464">[464]</span> in the +country to three or four hundred girls from Leeds. While in the +carriage I read her my address, and she was so angry I thought she +would have stopped the carriage and put me down to walk home. Old +Lady Stanley, her mother, came in the evening; she is a valiant old +lady, and fought the cause of the School Board at dinner and the +cause of Gladstone and her party, which she loves above +principle.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd July.</em>—Back to London. Sheykh Jemal-ed-Din is +expected in James Street, and I went down at once to the India +Office where I was fortunate enough to find Randolph just coming +from the House. I met him at the door of the Office and walked with +him up to his room. He looked fagged and ill and complained of the +stairs, though in truth it was only one flight and not a steep one. +He promised to meet Jemal-ed-Din at my house to-morrow at half-past +ten, and I explained to him exactly who he was, with the history of +his doings in Egypt and India. ‘He is in the black book,’ I said, +‘of every one here, and an enemy of England. But if he was not he +would be of no use to us.’ I asked him about the Civil Service +examinations for India in reference to a report in yesterday’s +‘Pall Mall’ of his having decided to take the matter up. But he +told me this was not true; he intended to meddle very little with +details, but to push on a general inquiry into the state of the +Indian Government. ‘Everything here,’ he said, ‘is at a deadlock, +owing to the uncertainty of Afghanistan and Egypt.’ I did not stay +with him for more than a few minutes for he seemed quite +exhausted.</p> + +<p>“<em>23rd July.</em>—Jemal-ed-Din arrived in the night, and at +half-past ten punctually Randolph came to James Street; he was all +right again and in his usual<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_465">[465]</span> spirits. Before introducing the Afghan I +read Randolph over my Electoral Address, of which he highly +approved, correcting only a few words, that is to say, making me +leave out the qualifications about the <em>South</em> of England in +speaking of my belief in Tory popularity, and the allusion to Lord +Salisbury having made ‘an alliance with the Irish leaders.’ He was +also doubtful about my saying anything regarding an Irish +Parliament. All the rest he approved, and said it was original and +good. He said he was in favour of import duties on manufactured +goods. I asked him whether he had any special scheme himself for +ameliorating the condition of the poor, and he said ‘No, but Lord +Salisbury has.’</p> + +<p>“Then I showed him Pollen’s letter, communicating Lord Ripon’s +message about agricultural banks in India and the Oxford +examinations. He said that I might tell Lord Ripon that he was +favourable about both matters, and especially about the +agricultural banks, and that if he would draw him up a scheme on +paper he would support it. But he had not the necessary knowledge +on either subject to push it without assistance, nor the time to +get the questions up. He seemed pleased at Lord Ripon’s having +communicated with him. I also mentioned the case of Suchait Singh +and the Pundit of Vizianagram, and he told me to send the details +to Moore, his secretary. About Lepel Griffin he said he could not +quarrel with him, but he was writing to him by this mail, and would +suggest to him that he should make me some apology.</p> + +<p>“Then we sent for Jemal-ed-Din, whom Randolph received with +great politeness and made him sit by him on the sofa. They talked +in French, but I soon perceived that Randolph knew very little of +the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_466">[466]</span> language, and I +had to translate for them. Randolph first asked about the Mahdi’s +death, whether it was true, and Jemal-ed-Din said he thought not, +but even if true it would make little difference, as the Soudanese +would choose a successor. Randolph asked who that would be. +<em>Jemal-ed-Din</em>: ‘It would not be Osman Digna, but one of the +Mahdi’s companions, a man of religion; Osman Digna would be the +General but not the Khalifa. All would be done as on the occasion +of Mohammed’s death, when the most religious man was chosen.’ +Randolph then asked about Afghanistan, what the Amir’s position +was. And Jemal-ed-Din’s account was briefly this: Abd-el-Rahman, he +said, was a good general but he was not a great politician, though +neither was he a fool. He had the majority of the Afghans with him, +but nothing would be easier than to get up revolts against him. The +Afghans were simple-minded people—<em>peuple naïf</em>—ignorant of +politics and always ready to fight. The Russians might make a +revolt through Ishak Khan or a dozen others of the sons of Shere +Ali and the princely house. Nothing would be easier. The Russians +had no intention of fighting the Afghans this year, but would make +friends with some of these princes and raise disturbances. They +would represent themselves as allies against the English and would +promise the provinces of Cashmere and Peshawar if India revolted. +The Afghans would believe them. <em>Randolph</em>: ‘Do the Afghans +hate us more than the Russians?’ <em>Jemal-ed-Din</em>: ‘The +Russians have done no harm to the Afghans. The English have made +three wars on them.’ <em>Randolph</em>: ‘But do not you consider +that the Russians have done more harm to Islam than we have done?’ +<em>Jemal-ed-Din</em>: ‘The Russians have swallowed up a few +principalities, the Crimea, Circassia,<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_467">[467]</span> and among the Turcomans, but England has +destroyed the great empire at Delhi, it has invaded Egypt, the +Soudan.’ <em>Randolph</em>: ‘It was the Mahrattas that destroyed +the Mogul Empire.’ <em>Jemal-ed-Din</em>: ‘The Mahrattas came and +went. Nadir Shah invaded India, but he was a Moslem. You remained +and you destroyed the Empire. There are three reasons why the +Mohammedans of India have hated you more than the Russians: +Firstly, because you destroyed the Empire of Delhi; secondly, +because you give no salaries to the <em>imams</em> and +<em>muezzins</em> and keepers of the mosques, which the Russians +are careful to do; and you have resigned the Wakaf property and do +not repair the sacred buildings.’ <em>Randolph</em>: ‘We repair +some of the mosques.’ <em>Jemal-ed-Din</em>: ‘Only when they are +works of art, not for the sake of religion. And, thirdly, because +you give no high offices of rank in the army to Mohammedans. The +Russians do this.’ <em>Randolph</em>: ‘There are many Mohammedans +in the highest offices in the Native States of India.’ +<em>Jemal-ed-Din</em>: ‘The Native States are not British India. +What the belly has not swallowed it does not digest.’ (Here we +laughed.) <em>Randolph</em>: ‘Then you think England a greater +danger to Mohammedans than Russia?’ <em>Jemal-ed-Din</em>: ‘I do +not say so; I have spoken of the past. England has done more harm +to us than Russia, but Russia is now more dangerous. If the +Russians remain, I do not say at Penjdeh or Tulfikar or Merushak, +but at Merv still five years, there will be no more Afghanistan and +no more Persia and no more Anatolia and no more India. All will +have been swallowed. They will leave Penjdeh and the rest, but it +will matter nothing; they will remain in Merv.’ <em>Randolph</em>: +‘This is true. But what would you have us do?’ +<em>Jemal-ed-Din</em>: ‘You must make an alliance<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_468">[468]</span> with Islam, with the Afghans, +the Persians, the Turks, the Egyptians, the Arabs; you must drive +the Russians back out of Merv to the Caspian Sea. To make friends +with the Mohammedans you must leave Egypt. There is no danger for +Egypt from foreign nations. You hold Cyprus, you hold Aden, what do +you fear? Nor from the Mahdi. With a Mohammedan government in Egypt +the Mahdi is not a danger. Then you must make alliance with the +Mohammedans, who would believe you their friend.’ +<em>Randolph</em>: ‘Could we send troops or officers to Afghanistan +to help the Afghans against Russia?’ <em>Jemal-ed-Din</em>: ‘If you +send troops, as for instance to Candahar, even with the Amir’s +consent, it will be the right of any Moslem to go to the top of a +hill and raise a revolt against you. He would say you were come +under pretence of a friendship to take possession; and all would +believe him. You might, however, send officers, a few officers, for +these could not take possession. They would be servants of the +Amir. But remember, if the Russians stay five years at Merv it will +be too late; you should attack them not through Afghanistan but by +the other side; then the Mollahs would preach a <em>jehad</em> to +join you against the Russians.’</p> + +<p>“The conversation lasted about three-quarters of an hour, and +Randolph then went away. He did not say much to Jemal-ed-Din, but +to me he expressed himself, as I went with him to the door, much +pleased with the Seyyid’s frankness and the justness of his views. +He promised to send Wolff to see him. Also he recommended me to +write to Lord Salisbury, asking to be supported in my claim to +return to Egypt this autumn. I am cited to appear before a Court +there (in connection with my property) in October, and this gives +me a good excuse.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_469">[469]</span>“I then saw +Justin McCarthy at the House of Commons, and asked him about that +portion of my Electoral Address which related to Ireland. He +approved. Thence I went to Cardinal Manning, who warmly approved my +address which I read to him. But he objected to my declaration in +favour of an Irish Parliament, assuring me that the Irish did not +want one. He had just seen six Irish bishops, who all declared this +to be the case; he, the Cardinal, had written to Rome in this +sense. He wanted local self government for Ireland,—not a +Parliament which he considered would be a prelude to separation. He +has given me a card of introduction to Canon McGrath of Camberwell, +who will tell me what it is the Irish of Camberwell want.</p> + +<p>“Partly on this account, partly through what Mr. Palmer, the +secretary of the Camberwell Association told me, I altered this +part of my programme, making it more vague and leaving out the word +‘parliament.’ Palmer came while we were at dinner, and frightened +us by announcing that two new Conservative candidates had been +started, and complaining that Randolph had not sent the letter he +promised. It was almost time for the meeting, but I sent Hope to +Randolph’s house and then to the House of Commons, where he saw him +but could not get the letter from him, as he said my allusion to +the Irish Parliament would be a Cabinet question. This very nearly +upset our coach, but fortunately I had made my speech before Hope +arrived at the meeting, and had won the confidence of the +delegates. There was some close questioning about my Irish ideas, +and I reduced my policy to one of ascertaining Irish wishes and +giving Home Rule as far as possible in accordance with them. Also +one old gentleman declared he could not be party to selecting a +Roman Catholic.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_470">[470]</span> But +the rest were strongly for me. We, that is the two other +candidates, local people, and myself were turned out into the +street for twenty minutes while the voting was going on (a rather +ridiculous proceeding, during which we compared notes as to our +chances), and at the end of it I was called back and was declared +selected by sixteen to one. Three had not voted, having gone round +the corner to allay thirst, but they were also held to be my +supporters. So I may consider it a considerable triumph.”</p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_471">[471]</span><a id= +"c12"></a>CHAPTER XII</h2> + +<p class="sch1">THE GENERAL ELECTION OF 1885—RANDOLPH AT THE INDIA +OFFICE—DRUMMOND WOLFF’S MISSION</p> + +<p class="dcap">FOR the next four months I was busy carrying on the +work of my candidature in Camberwell, over the details of which I +shall pass lightly. The constituency was a new one, having only +just been created by the Redistribution Bill, and it was +politically a chaos. My chief supporters were men of no position, +character, or intelligence, the most active of my committee being a +sweating tailor; and I had to create everything in the way of +organization, and educate the voters from the first A B C of +instruction on public matters. This was an advantage and a +disadvantage; on the one hand there was little prejudice to +overcome, and on the other extreme difficulty in getting the voters +to take any interest in the matters they were called upon to +decide. I began with very small meetings to very degraded +audiences, sometimes in rooms obtained for the purpose, but oftener +mounted on a wagon in the streets, where I found that nothing much +short of pure socialism would be listened to. The division was +supposed to be strongly Radical, but as time went on my Tory +democracy became popular, at least in the streets; and, as will be +seen, I very nearly succeeded in winning the election. Had I been +properly supported from the Conservative head-quarters I have no +doubt I should have succeeded altogether. But the declarations I +felt bound to make in favour of Irish Home Rule, joined to the fact +of my Roman Catholic status, told against me, and in the end I was +defeated, but by only one hundred and sixty-two votes. I will +give<span class="pagenum" id="Page_472">[472]</span> only such +extracts from my journal as take my candidature out of the ordinary +rut of commonplace experience. My journal was too hastily written +at this time of stress to have much interest apart from the +election.</p> + +<p>“<em>27th July.</em>—There is something exceedingly absurd in +this electioneering business; one hundred frowsy fellows in a +stuffy schoolroom talking nonsense to each other about things they +none of them understand, or care about a straw. It is an +experience, however, like another, and we must go through it if we +are to achieve anything of large importance in the world. Yet it is +a terrible come-down after the politics of the golden East, or even +of an Arab tribe.</p> + +<p>“<em>28th July.</em>—I have been in trepidation the last few +days, for the report of the Mahdi’s death seems confirmed. Went to +see Lothian, who has just been staying at Hatfield. He complains +that Lord Salisbury is less free spoken on affairs now than when he +was out of office, but he gathers from what he heard that there is +no danger at all of a new campaign. A reconciliation will be +effected with Turkey, but no further alliance will be entered into +for the defence of Persia or Afghanistan. ‘Lord Salisbury,’ Lothian +said, ‘still holds to his old illusion of believing the Russian +advance to be geographically impossible. He still looks at the map +and calls it a great way from the Caspian to the Persian Gulf.’ +Talking of past events, he told me that when the news came of the +fall of Khartoum Hartington actually resigned office, and was out +of office three days; he would not resume his position until the +absurd determination of advancing still on Khartoum was agreed to. +This is curious. [I believe it is also true that the pretence made +by Gladstone of fighting Russia over the<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_473">[473]</span> Penjdeh incident was nothing more than a +manœuvre to persuade Hartington to agree to an evacuation of the +Soudan.]</p> + +<p>“<em>29th July.</em>—Wolff, whom I met at the Carlton Club, +talked pretty freely about his plans in Egypt. ‘I wish I knew,’ he +said, ‘how to set up an independent Government at Dongola.’ I said, +‘You had much better leave it to the Mahdi.’ They will end by doing +this.</p> + +<p>“To Crabbet with Nebbi Ullah, who is going back shortly to India +to start a newspaper. He, like all the rest, has become spoilt by +his English life. Jemal-ed-Din and I have done our best to persuade +him to purge himself of it by making the pilgrimage and never to +put on European dress again. But he has not the backbone for this. +Indians who have lived in England are taken by our life and ways, +and find it difficult to return. They generally fall in love with +some English woman and abandon the ways of their people. I spoke +strongly to him, but it will be of no use. ‘If a man,’ said +Jemal-ed-Din, ‘wishes to do good to himself, nothing is easier. But +if he wishes to do good to his country he must deny himself.’ ‘I do +not wish to be a martyr,’ said Nebbi Ullah, ‘I wish to keep my +English clothes and be able to ride and play lawn-tennis and get +refreshment at refreshment rooms when I travel.’ I said, ‘You may +put on your best English clothes and go to church if you like on +Sundays, the English in India will not receive you, and you will +lose all influence with your fellow countrymen.’</p> + +<p>“<em>30th July.</em>—Wolff came to James Street as agreed at +half-past ten. Before he saw Jemal-ed-Din I had a talk with him on +the general question of Egypt, the Soudan, and Turkey. With regard +to Egypt he told me they would have to keep on Tewfik +for<span class="pagenum" id="Page_474">[474]</span> the present, +and that Lord Salisbury could not be got as yet to consent to +Arabi’s recall. In the Soudan they had no idea of any new +expedition, Turkish or English. They had rather make peace with the +Soudanese, but had some idea of setting up an independent +government at Dongola. They were resolved to renew the alliance +with the Sultan. The points Wolff principally discussed with +Jemal-ed-Din were as to a possible acknowledgement by the Mahdi of +the Sultan’s Caliphate. This Jemal-ed-Din declared to be +impossible, either for the Mahdi or his successors, but they might +be got to accept each other, as the Ottoman Sultan and the Sultan +of Morocco had done, if Egypt were evacuated by the English and a +legal Mohammedan Government restored there. There would then be no +danger from the Soudanese. The Mahdist movement was religious and +the Ulema of Cairo would not permit him to invade Egypt. There +ensued a long discussion about the evacuation, Wolff declaring that +Bismarck had announced in writing to the Foreign Office that he +should approve the French entering Egypt if we abandoned it. The +French would never allow Turkish troops, and it must be occupied +somehow. So it would be by the French. This the Seyyid refused to +believe, as he knew from Ferry and others in France that nothing of +the sort would happen. In the end, however, it was agreed between +Wolff and the Seyyid that, if England consented to fix a date for +evacuation, an arrangement with the Sultan might be come to. There +followed the Slave Trade question in the Soudan. Jemal-ed-Din said +it was impossible to stop the capture of idolatrous tribes in +Central Africa, but the seizure and sale of Abyssinians might be +prevented by the Mahdi. He could arrange that matter and commercial +relations with England and Egypt. It would<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_475">[475]</span> not be difficult to get the Sultan to +consent to reasonable arrangements for Egypt, and Jemal-ed-Din +would go if necessary to Constantinople—this was my suggestion—nor +would it be difficult to get the Sultan to propose Arabi’s return. +Wolff, however, said distinctly that nothing definite could be +settled till after the elections. His present mission was to feel +the ground and prepare for a policy. The elections would decide +whether it could be carried out. Their talk lasted an hour and a +half.</p> + +<p>“Lunched with Meynell and Cox, editors of the ‘Weekly Register’ +and ‘Tablet.’ They will go with me to-night to a meeting at +Camberwell. Cox is to see Cardinal Manning and get a message of +approval from him. Meynell told me among other things that Colonel +Butler, his brother-in-law, could give evidence that the +bombardment of Alexandria was forced on by Beauchamp Seymour, that +they had tried to bribe the Egyptians to fire the first shot, or +something of the sort. Egmont Hake was there and promised to give a +lecture on Gordon at Camberwell in the interests of my candidature. +Meynell tells me that Lord Salisbury has engaged Hake to lecture in +all the large towns in England preparatory to the elections. Lord +Salisbury is to pay the expenses.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th Aug.</em>—Randolph, whom I met at the Carlton Club, has +promised that Lewisham and Folkestone shall support me at a meeting +at Camberwell, as the working men insist upon having a lord—‘no +M.P.s for us’ they say. Drummond Wolff talked to me again about +Jemal-ed-Din going to Constantinople. ‘He is too stiff in his +ideas, however,’ he said, ‘about the Mahdi not accepting the +Sultan’s Caliphate.’ Wolff will send for Jemal-ed-Din if he wants +him, and will communicate with me through Randolph, with whom, he +tells me, he shall have a private cipher<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_476">[476]</span>—a new feature, this, in our diplomacy. +Gregory, who called to-day, says that Wolff told him he should +explain to Tewfik that he had acted in the matter of the massacres +on wrong information, and that he considered him a very honest +man.</p> + +<p>“<em>5th Aug.</em>—I have read over my Electoral Address to +McCarthy as far as it relates to Ireland, and he highly approves +it, suggesting only that I should put in the words ‘Representatives +of the Irish Nation,’ so as to show that I accepted the Irish +Parliamentary Party as being the real national leaders. This I was +quite willing to do. He assured me of the Irish support at +Camberwell; they all meant to vote with the Tories. He warned me +not to pay attention to anything they might say about being +indifferent to both parties. It was the <em>mot d’ordre</em> just +now to say this, but the elections would prove which way their +predilections turned. Drummond Wolff has telegraphed from +Portsmouth, asking once more to see Jemal-ed-Din.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th Aug.</em>—Up to London early with Jemal-ed-Din, and had +another long talk with him and Drummond Wolff. Wolff is quite +favourable to a Turco-Perso-Afghan alliance, but says he shall not +be able to talk of this with the Sultan, except incidentally, as +that would be the ambassador’s business, but shall have to keep to +Egypt. He was very anxious to know how an accord could be made +between the Sultan and the Mahdi. Would the Mahdi acknowledge the +Caliphate? Jemal-ed-Din said it would not be necessary to decide or +even raise that point just yet. The thing the Sultan would really +care for was a fixing of a limit of time for the English +occupation. Wolff said that that could be done; and that what would +be proposed would be that the Sultan should co-operate in the +establishment of a permanent order<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_477">[477]</span> of things preparatory to English +evacuation. On this Jemal-ed-Din said that all could be +satisfactorily arranged, and that it mattered little whether it was +Turkish or English troops which would compose the <em>ad +interim</em> garrison. Next there was a good deal of talk as to +whether Jemal-ed-Din should go to Constantinople while Wolff was +there, the principal point being as to whether the Sultan would +understand it rightly. Jemal-ed-Din said that the Sultan knew him +only as an enemy of English policy, and, unless Wolff explained the +position, he would fancy Jemal-ed-Din had come to Constantinople to +counteract Wolff. Wolff, however, said that it would be difficult +for him to protect Jemal-ed-Din, or seem to have anything to do +with him. There was the question, too, of money, but I offered to +advance the Seyyid any money that might be wanted so that no +inconvenient questions should be raised. Wolff explained that he +should not tell Lord Salisbury anything about the Seyyid or his +arrangements with me. ‘The reason I am sent,’ he said, ‘is that I +am ready to take responsibilities of this sort on my shoulders +which other men might refuse. I shall have a cipher with Randolph, +and if I want the Seyyid, or have anything else to tell you, it +will be through him.’ He told us, however, again very distinctly, +that he did not expect to be able to settle anything definitely +till after the elections. The French were very adverse to Turkish +troops going to Egypt, and Bismarck would give no firm support till +after the elections.</p> + +<p>“We also talked about the recall of Arabi, and Jemal-ed-Din said +it would be quite easy to get the Sultan to propose it, two words +from him would effect that. I repeated this to Wolff, after he had +left my house, at the Carlton Club, but he said: ‘It would never do +to raise the question of Arabi yet; after the<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_478">[478]</span> elections we may do it, but not now.’ +Lord Salisbury requires educating to that as to other things.</p> + +<p>“To a meeting at Camberwell with Napier, Meynell, and Lady Colin +Campbell. Randolph sent down Lord Folkestone and Sir Henry +Fletcher, as members of the Government, to support me with a +message to the effect that my presence in Parliament was necessary +to the party and they must get me elected.</p> + +<p>“<em>7th Aug.</em>—Mr. Cotton,<a id="FNanchor_127"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_127" class="fnanchor">[127]</a> of the Indian Civil +Service, came to breakfast. He is a very enlightened man, and one +with whom one can talk openly. Speaking of the late Durbar, he said +that the Amir Abd-el-Rahman’s unwillingness to allow English troops +into Afghanistan came like a clap of thunder on Lord Dufferin, who, +with the rest of the officials, was under the idea that the Afghans +loved us and sought our help.</p> + +<p>“Randolph made his statement on the Indian Budget last night in +a very masterly speech; but he attacked Lord Ripon in it, as I +thought, most foolishly. I met him at the Carlton Club, and told +him I was sorry he had done it. And he said it was quite necessary +on party grounds in view of the election. But he felt sure native +opinion in India would be satisfied with his promise of inquiry +into the Indian Government. Drummond Wolff was also at the Club, +and we talked again about Jemal-ed-Din’s visit to Constantinople. +His last words were that he would write or telegraph to Randolph, +who would communicate his ideas to me.</p> + +<p>“Lunched with Button and Sidney Herbert. Button’s candidature is +going badly at Clapham, and his brother’s at Southwark has, after +all, broken down<span class="pagenum" id="Page_479">[479]</span> +completely. Now he says the people all say I shall get in for +Camberwell.</p> + +<p>“<em>9th Aug.</em>—To Windsor with the Wagrams, and called on +the Ponsonbys, who showed us over the Castle, including the Queen’s +private rooms. The long gallery in which she walks is full of +interesting pictures. The series of daubs by Winterhalter of royal +marriages and christenings are daubs certainly, but already +interesting through time. I don’t think we were intended to go into +the Queen’s bedroom, but I looked in and was very nearly locked in +by the housekeeper for my curiosity. She had already turned the +key, and thoughts of the Tower and a trial for high treason crossed +my mind, but fortunately I was remembered and released.</p> + +<p>“<em>13th Aug.</em>—Crabbet. To Newbuildings to spend the day, +which, like all the rest of this summer, was heavenly. Coming home +I found an important communication from Churchill enclosing a +deciphered telegram from Wolff, saying that he wants the Seyyid to +join him at Constantinople. The Seyyid has been in great force here +for the last ten days, and has given us most valuable information +about the past history of his own and other countries. ‘Nadir +Shah,’ he says, ‘was the son of a tradesman in Kelaat. He rose +against the Afghan rule, and, having driven the Afghans out of +Persia, conquered Afghanistan and Upper India. It was he who gave +Arab horses to the Turcomans, the breed they now possess.’ [We had +staying with us my cousin, Arthur Chandler, an Oxford divine, who +has since become a colonial bishop, and I arranged that they should +have a dispute together on the fundamental grounds of religion. +This was carried on in very indifferent French but with much spirit +by the Seyyid, who certainly got the best of the argument.]</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_480">[480]</span>“<em>14th +Aug.</em>—To London with the Seyyid. I went at once to the India +Office, where I found Randolph very dull and tired with the end of +the Session, which is to-day. He will be off, however, to Scotland +to-morrow. I told him the Seyyid would start at once, but that he +insisted Wolff should give the Sultan a hint directly or indirectly +that he had ceased to be an enemy of England; also that he hoped +Wolff would not open negotiations till he arrived, or attempt to +treat the Egyptian question separately from that of the Mohammedan +alliance. Randolph with his usual quickness seized the points at +once, and wrote a telegram to Wolff something as follows: +‘Jemal-ed-Din starts for Constantinople on Sunday. He says, +however, he is known to the Sultan only as the enemy of England, +and it would be necessary to give the Sultan a hint that he is now +our friend. He hopes also that you will not enter on the Egyptian +question with the Sultan separately from the larger question of a +Mohammedan alliance. With regard to this last he believes he can be +of great service to you.’</p> + +<p>“I also saw Ibrahim and wish I had seen him before, for he is a +great support to me with the Seyyid, and is bolder than he is. I am +for their starting together at once, and not waiting for an answer +from Wolff. One never knows what changes of mind may take place, +and the ball is at our foot now and we must play with courage. My +fear is lest Wolff should be scared by the telegram which the +Seyyid insisted on. If I had had my way, he should have started +without conditions; Wolff could not refuse him protection when he +arrived. But we shall see.</p> + +<p>“Down again to Crabbet for the night, and for a meeting of the +Primrose League at the Worth School.<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_481">[481]</span> Young Montefiore was put in the chair, to +practise him for a Parliamentary candidature in London. He had +learnt his little opening speech by heart and recited it nicely. My +own speech dealt principally with the possibility of peasant +proprietorship. It gave satisfaction to the Radicals at the end of +the room.</p> + +<p>“<em>15th Aug.</em>—There is a telegram from Pesth, saying that +Wolff has delayed his departure till Tuesday. This will give +Jemal-ed-Din time to join him there, and they will go on by the +same train. Ibrahim is to go as far as Varna and there wait further +orders. To London for this purpose. Parliament was adjourned +yesterday and London is empty. To my horror I found a letter in +James Street from Moore, Randolph’s secretary, enclosing a telegram +from Wolff—just what I expected—to say he had changed his mind +about Jemal-ed-Din; he had better not start till he telegraphed +again from Constantinople. I went first to Moore at the India +Office and talked the matter over, and he agreed with me that it +seemed a pity the Seyyid should not start, and that we might +telegraph that it was too late to stop him. But he would not do +anything without Randolph’s order. So I went on to Connaught Place +and saw Randolph. He has been ill with a slight congestion of the +lungs, but says that he is better to-day, and we discussed the +point fully. But I could not persuade him to let me send the +Seyyid, so the whole thing is off. The tiresome part of it is that +it is just at starting that Jemal-ed-Din would have been of most +use. But there is no help. The Seyyid’s ticket and Ibrahim’s were +already taken, and I had given them £100 for their journey, all for +nothing. [I have always been of opinion that Wolff’s change of mind +on this occasion cost him the success of his mission,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_482">[482]</span> and that its ultimate failure +was due to his having commenced it on the common lines of English +diplomacy without that moral support which Seyyid Jemal-ed-Din +could have given him both at Constantinople and elsewhere with the +secret societies.]</p> + +<p>“<em>17th Aug.</em>—My birthday of forty-five, which I spent +pleasantly enough with the children and Anne. Mrs. Sellwood<a id= +"FNanchor_128"></a><a href="#Footnote_128" class= +"fnanchor">[128]</a> and Cowie had tea with me. Mrs. Sellwood told +me the history of my father’s death, how she had disliked the +hounds coming to Crabbet, and how they had howled, and how he had +caught cold cub hunting and died. Thus the day passed.</p> + +<p>“When I look at my life, I see that it is still progressing, and +while there is progress there is happiness. I look forward to +Parliament as the beginning of a new phase. I shall be Cabinet +Minister in five years’ time; head of my party, perhaps, in ten. +But shall I get in? I think it is in my fate. [I feel some shame in +transcribing these vain-glorious words, but they had more +justification at the moment they were written than they can +possibly seem to have now. At that date Randolph Churchill was +certainly the coming man in English public life, and my position +with him was one which, if I had succeeded in obtaining a seat in +the House of Commons, would have made me one of his most trusted +lieutenants. I may say more: I exercised over him a very +considerable influence, precisely in the direction in which he +needed most support. I think I could have prevented him from making +some of the larger mistakes he<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_483">[483]</span> made, and which eventually caused his ruin. +I have sometimes thought that I could even have maintained him +faithful to Irish Home Rule, and that together we might have +persuaded Lord Salisbury to adopt it as the Tory policy. It would +have saved the Tories their present disaster at the hands of the +Irish party. My defeat left Churchill without any adviser in the +ways of political virtue.]</p> + +<p>“<em>18th Aug.</em>—The Prince of Wales has sent me a message +through Lady C. congratulating me on my standing for +Parliament.</p> + +<p>“<em>19th Aug.</em>—Down to Brocket, where Auberon Herbert, his +wife and children are staying with Henry Cowper. Etty Fane is here, +grown to be a very pretty and clever girl after one London season. +Of all people I like Henry Cowper best as companion. He represents +the Whig tradition in its most attractive form, that of the +cultured politician of a hundred years ago, partly humane, partly +sceptical, full of dignity and profoundly immoral. He told me +innumerable stories connected with Brocket. It was outside the park +at Brocket, on the high road, that Lady Caroline Lamb and her +husband were riding when they met Lord Byron’s funeral, and she +fell straightway off her horse. There is a portrait of Lady +Melbourne here, as a young woman, which is charming.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th Aug.</em>—After luncheon we went to Hatfield, Herbert +and I on foot, Henry and his niece, Miss Fane, in a pony chaise. On +the way we discussed social questions, on which Herbert has very +distinct and original ideas. He is against all State intervention, +either against drink or prostitution, believing in free trade in +both as the best cure; he is against State education, rates, or any +kind of taxes, which should all be voluntary. He trusts to a kind +of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_484">[484]</span> natural +selection to bring about improvements with as little interference +as may be by Government.</p> + +<p>“Hatfield is quite the most perfect thing I have seen, there +being none of those great waste places common in most parks. We +drove home all together in the pony carriage. I am glad to have +been here at Brocket, as it has cleared my ideas on certain points +very misty to me; not that I altogether agree with Herbert, for +anarchism is certainly outside the range of practical politics, but +his views are large and elevated and do one good.</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd Aug.</em>—To London for Stead’s social demonstration. +The procession was entirely of the rag-tag and bobtail, with +banners of the most curious devices: one represented the Minotaur, +a princely personage in a blue uniform, and his victim; another a +van full of middle-aged females, labelled ‘Protection for Girls.’ +Also there were political badges; one banner stated that its bearer +had refused taxes because he had no vote; and there were +socialistic and temperance vans, with ‘John Bright’ and ‘Sir +Wilfrid Lawson Associations.’ In the Park I went the round of the +platforms, each with male and female speakers, and was fortunate +enough to hear Stead speak. This he did well, with a good deal of +dramatic action, but a certain self consciousness which +occasionally marred the effect. Besides the regular platform +speakers, there were volunteer orators, who held forth to groups on +the ground. One I listened to attacked Randolph fiercely through +his brother Blandford, with whose history the speaker professed to +be well acquainted. The best speech I heard, however, was from a +democratic socialist; he hit the demonstration hard when he +expostulated against all parties in the state, and especially +against the Radical capitalists. Samuel Morley, he said, +had<span class="pagenum" id="Page_485">[485]</span> subscribed +£2,000 for the protection of girls, but when had he ever given £5 +to a girl of the 5,000 in his own factories to save her from +perdition? It was the capitalists who were the cause of all crime +and misery, and who ground the faces of the poor. What we wanted +was not social reform, but social revolution. And he took his hat +and showed on its brim how a revolution should be made. When the +poor, he said, have got the rich under them they will know how to +keep them there. I could not help cheering.</p> + +<p>“<em>27th Aug.</em>—A note from Moore asking me to come and see +him. Randolph had told him to read me an extract from a letter of +Wolff’s. It was to the effect that he was in such a delicate +position in regard to his mission that he dared not appear to know +Jemal-ed-Din. Jemal-ed-Din, he said, was opposed to the Sultan’s +Caliphate in the Soudan, and if he acknowledged him as a friend, +the Sultan might think that he had some design on his spiritual +pretensions. For this reason he dared not mention his name. This is +all nonsense. The question of the Sultan’s Caliphate need never be +raised, and Jemal-ed-Din is not known as its opponent. On the +contrary his newspaper was always loud on the Sultan’s rights. The +Seyyid, however, declined to go to Constantinople without some +acknowledgement from Wolff, because he says it would ruin his +influence everywhere if the Sultan were to shut the door in his +face. But I am to see Randolph to-morrow.</p> + +<p>“<em>28th Aug.</em>—At half-past one I called on Randolph at the +India Office; he is looking fagged and ill, and is still obliged to +stay in town, but talks of going to Scotland next week. I feel +convinced he will not live two years, or will be obliged to give up +public life.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_486">[486]</span> We +talked over the Jemal-ed-Din affair, but as Jemal-ed-Din refuses to +go to Constantinople without Wolff’s support, and as Wolff refuses +to commit himself with Jemal-ed-Din, we agreed the matter must +remain so. Then we talked about Olivier Pain, and I told Randolph +the whole story, and how Hartington had denied the proclamation +issued by Wolseley offering £50 for him, dead or alive. This +delighted him, and he offered to send my letter about it to Lord +Salisbury at Dieppe, and I gave it to him. Lastly, I told him I had +heard things were going badly at Hyderabad, and asked him to write +to the Nizam and warn him. But he said that to do so would be +against all rules, and that he could only communicate through the +Government of India. He told me, however, but as an absolute +secret, that he had already written to Lord Dufferin to suggest +that Cordery should be removed from Hyderabad. I then asked him to +get Moore sent there, Colonel Moore, who is now with the Duke of +Connaught, and he seemed to like the idea. Poor Randolph! I fear +that the attainment of his ambition, like the wasps with the +honey-pot, will be his death.</p> + +<p>“Lady Gregory sends me a sonnet on the Mahdi’s death, which is +very good.</p> + +<p>“<em>3rd Sept.</em>—Last night I made my declaration about +Ireland. It is the first public declaration made, since Parnell’s +speech, in favour of Home Rule.</p> + +<p>“<em>4th Sept.</em>—Ibrahim Bey has received a letter from +Ismaïl Jowdat once more pressing him to come and see the Sultan. It +has been decided he shall go. The Sultan has heard of Jemal-ed-Din +having seen one of the Ministers, and has sent for Ibrahim to find +out what it is all about. He wants Jemal-ed-Din too, but the Seyyid +says he will wait till the Sultan sends for him. For +Ibrahim<span class="pagenum" id="Page_487">[487]</span> there will +be no danger, and I will put him in communication with Wolff and +let Randolph know.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th Sept.</em>—Ibrahim left last night for Constantinople. +Jemal-ed-Din will stay on in London.</p> + +<p>“<em>12th Sept.</em>—Lord Salisbury has answered my letter as to +my being allowed to return to Egypt with great politeness. He says +he thinks it can be arranged. George Wyndham has come back from the +wars, I am glad to say, with a sound skin.</p> + +<p>“<em>15th Sept.</em>—Went to the ‘Pall Mall’ office and saw +Milner,<a id="FNanchor_129"></a><a href="#Footnote_129" class= +"fnanchor">[129]</a> the acting editor in Stead’s place, about a +letter I had written for them but wished to withdraw, and explained +to him how the case stood. He agreed with me that it might be well +to defer the publication, and admitted that I was fully justified +in withdrawing the letter under the circumstances in which Stead +was placed. He tells me that from the first he did not approve of +Stead’s “revelations.” He was very amiable about it all. I like +Milner.</p> + +<p>“<em>16th Sept.</em>—Mr. Tebbutt from St. Ives is here, at +Crabbet, and I took him to Newbuildings, to talk over the question +of establishing small holders there on small rents. But, though a +strong Liberal, he does not advise it; thinks it will not +answer.</p> + +<p>“<em>19th Sept.</em>—Gladstone has published a manifesto, and I +have been writing to him protesting against his repetition of the +plea of <em>honour</em> in excuse of the bombardment of Alexandria. +George Wyndham is just back from Cyprus and the Soudan. He spoke +with great admiration of the Arabs.</p> + +<p>“<em>20th Sept.</em>—There has been a revolution in<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_488">[488]</span> Roumelia. This is Russian +doing in answer to Wolff’s mission, or rather in anticipation of +the elections here. Jemal-ed-Din always said they would make a move +two months before the elections, and here it is. My feeling is that +it is useless attempting to retain any part of Europe for the Turks +except just the city of Constantinople. I am certain Lord Salisbury +will do nothing to protect them anywhere out of Asia Minor.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st Sept.</em>—I have written to Mr. Gladstone proposing +to meet him on a platform and discuss the question of Egypt with +him as a ‘question of honour.’</p> + +<p>“<em>22nd Sept.</em>—William Morris was arrested two days ago at +a socialist trial for hissing the magistrate, and I have written to +congratulate him.</p> + +<p>“<em>23rd Sept.</em>—A letter has arrived from Ibrahim giving an +account of himself. He is staying with Jowdat, has been to the +Palace, and is to see the Sultan after Beiram. They are only angry +with him for not coming before. The Sultan is sending a man to +Jemal-ed-Din for consultation.</p> + +<p>“<em>24th Sept.</em>—Talked the whole question of Roumelia over +with Jemal-ed-Din, and we are agreed that it is not Russia but +Austria that has encouraged the movement at this moment. I told the +Seyyid it was useless trying to save European Turkey for the +Sultan; Lord Salisbury would not dare guarantee it. He does not +like this, but seems to think me right all the same. There is a +memorandum of Gordon’s of 1880 recommending the partition of the +Ottoman Empire, Egypt to England, Syria to France, Armenia to +Russia, and European Turkey to independent Christian States. +Jemal-ed-Din thinks Wolff must have had a hand in the Roumelian +movement. I don’t.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_489">[489]</span>“I have been +asked to deliver the inaugural address at the Tyneside lectures at +Newcastle on 1st October. I have chosen for my subject ‘Egyptian +Aggression, an answer to the Plea of Honour.’</p> + +<p>“<em>25th Sept.</em>—Chamberlain has been down in South London +speaking. Of his three proposals, taxing the rich, free schools, +and dividing the land I do not greatly quarrel with any.</p> + +<p>“<em>28th Sept.</em>—Munif Pasha is in London and has seen the +Seyyid. He wants to see Churchill. I have written about it.</p> + +<p>“<em>30th Sept.</em>—A great Tory demonstration at Crabbet held +in a large tent in the Park. Sir Walter Bartelot, Gregory, M.P., +and Grantham spoke. I was chairman. Bartelot is a really good +speaker.</p> + +<p>“Mr. Gladstone has answered my letter. He declines meeting me in +Midlothian and blames me for my action in Egypt.</p> + +<p>“<em>3rd Oct.</em>—The Hugh Wyndhams, the two Hardinges, and the +Wentworths are here (at Crabbet). I had a good deal of talk with +Hardinge about Egyptian diplomacy. He was with Dufferin in Egypt +after the war.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th Oct.</em>—Ferid Bey has written to ask to see me, and +he came to luncheon to-day. Jemal-ed-Din was there, and, as long as +he was present, Ferid dealt only with generalities; but, luncheon +over, we went upstairs and, after much beating about the bush, he +disclosed to me his real object. The state of things, he told me, +at Constantinople was hopeless, and the discontent so general that +important events might be looked for. The empire was crumbling to +pieces, and not only the empire but the Turkish nation too would +perish if nothing was done to save it. There were therefore people +who thought, and he himself was one, that the only safety lay in an +attempt<span class="pagenum" id="Page_490">[490]</span> to restore +the constitutional scheme of Midhat, and to take the absolute power +out of the Sultan’s hands. The present Sultan was incapable of +action, and yet he had absorbed all power to himself, and the +government was carried on by a gigantic system of espionage, which +alone hindered a revolt. A revolt, however, might now be expected, +and the power might be put into the hands of some capable general +acting for the nation, while the Sultan might be deposed in favour +of some other person, a member of his family or another—he would +not commit himself to say exactly whom. What made men hesitate was +only this: that they feared a disturbance of any sort at +Constantinople would be taken as a pretext by Russia for military +intervention. Bismarck, he told me, would oppose all idea of +constitutional government, but he thought Lord Salisbury might not +be opposed to it. He wanted me to find out whether the English +Government would allow Russian intervention, and whether a change +of Sultan would be acceptable to them. Abdul Hamid might throw +himself into Russian hands and ask protection against his people. +Would the English Government countenance a revolution? He asked +whether I thought it any good his consulting any one out of office, +Sir Henry Elliot for instance. I told him I thought Sir Henry +Elliot would be very little good with Lord Salisbury, but that if +he liked I would speak to Churchill about it. Wolff’s mission was +at a standstill because it was impossible to deal with the present +Sultan, and perhaps they might be willing to find a government with +which they could deal. He begged me to do this, only urging caution +as the idea might be frustrated if the English Government took it +badly; also as regards himself that I should not divulge his part +in the affair. ‘The state of espionage is such,’ he<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_491">[491]</span> said, ‘at Constantinople that +the son is spy on the father, the brother on the brother, and +though I know every man of note there, there are not two I would +trust as I do in talking with you.’ I told him he need fear nothing +on either head, that I would tell Churchill the position only if I +found they were at a standstill in their negotiations, and that I +would be silent as to himself. I asked him whether Musurus, the +ambassador, knew of this. ‘How should he?’ he said. ‘Musurus is a +traitor.’ He also forbade me to speak of it to Jemal-ed-Din, who +was imprudent and also a poor man, who might some day be tempted by +necessity. I have arranged with Moore to see Randolph +to-morrow.</p> + +<p>“<em>7th Oct.</em>—At twelve saw Randolph at the India Office, +and finding things as I supposed at a standstill with Wolff, told +him what I had heard. I, of course, did not say who had told me, +only that it was a person of high position, in no way connected +with Jemal-ed-Din or any other of my friends. He answered most +decidedly that there was not the remotest danger of Russia being +allowed to intervene, and seemed quite disposed to look favourably +on the idea of a change of <em>régime</em> at Constantinople as +favourable to the prospects of an arrangement. He promised me +absolute secrecy about it, and told me something of Wolff’s +progress. Wolff had come to the conclusion that it was very +necessary to take the Arab party at Constantinople into account, +and was surprised that Ibrahim had not been to see him yet. I said +he had probably been forbidden by the Sultan; and to-day a letter +came from Ibrahim saying he had sent in a full report of his doings +in England to the Sultan, and about myself among the rest. But the +Sultan had forgotten all about Wolff and England and everything but +Roumelia. Randolph<span class="pagenum" id="Page_492">[492]</span> +also promised to send Gorst down to support me at Camberwell, and +asked me to speak with him at a meeting on Indian social reform at +the Mansion House. Yesterday a letter had come from Lord Salisbury +telling me that the Egyptian Government decidedly refused to allow +my return to Cairo, and Randolph encouraged me to insist. I had +undertaken not to meddle with political questions or projects +during my stay. Randolph is looking better, and is very hearty and +pleasant. He is the most agreeable and least pedantic of official +men; office has not spoilt him, nor will it.</p> + +<p>“Tea at Lady Gregory’s, where I met Kinglake.</p> + +<p>“<em>8th Oct.</em>—A long talk with Jemal-ed-Din about prospects +at Constantinople and about the Caliphate. He is for the Mahdi or +the Mahdi’s successor taking the Sultan’s place, or the Sherif Own, +or the Imam of Sanaa—any of these he thought might now take the +lead. But Constantinople must remain the seat of the Caliphate, as +Arabia or Africa would be mere places of exile. Amongst other +things, he told me that it was he himself who had suggested to the +Sherif el Huseyn to claim the Caliphate, but El Huseyn had said it +was impossible without armed support, and the Arabs could never +unite except in the name of religion. Now, Jemal-ed-Din is very +anxious to be away again to the East. He will not go, he says, to +Constantinople unless the Sultan sends for him, and we have agreed +that if I do not win my election at Camberwell we will go together +to the Imam of Sanaa in Yemen and raise the standard of the +Caliphate, as I intended to do four years ago. I asked him whether +he thought the Sultan had had El Huseyn assassinated; and he said, +‘No, but perhaps some pasha had it done.’</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_493">[493]</span>“Ferid Bey came +at twelve, and I told him of the answer I had received from +Churchill, and that I felt very sure our Government would not be +much displeased with a change of <em>régime</em> at Constantinople. +At the same time I told him I thought it would be useless to kick +against the union of Roumelia and Bulgaria. This had been part of +his plan. He was of a different opinion, and said if they could +only get free of the present hindrance in the Sultan’s apathy they +were quite ready to carry the war to the Danube, Turkey’s true +frontier. I asked him if they were ready to fight Russia alone, and +he said ‘Yes.’ I told him, ‘If so, go on, I have nothing to say; +but you must not count on assistance from Lord Salisbury, or any +other English Minister; public opinion in England would not allow +it.’ He told me that, without actually deposing Abdul Hamid, they +might put pressure on him to force him to constitutional courses +and a defence of the Empire. I think, nevertheless, he will +discourage his friends from their plan.<a id= +"FNanchor_130"></a><a href="#Footnote_130" class= +"fnanchor">[130]</a></p> + +<p>“<em>9th Oct.</em>—Lord Salisbury has pronounced himself in an +admirable speech in Wales. It will do the Party good, for it is +straightforward and strong.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th Oct.</em>—I came to Newcastle last night, and made my +promised speech at the theatre to about three thousand people, +explaining to them the intrigues which had brought on the Egyptian +War. It is the most important speech I have ever made, and it +lasted two hours. Though most of the audience were devoted admirers +of Gladstone, I succeeded in carrying them with me, and it was +altogether a great success. What a difference between these north +country men and the miserable Camberwell rabble!<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_494">[494]</span> I am ashamed of my late +electioneering; it is a degrading business.</p> + +<p>“<em>12th Oct.</em>—Back to London. Drummond Wolff’s mission is +announced as having succeeded; the Sultan is to send a commissioner +with Wolff to Egypt. I expect Ibrahim Bey has been instrumental in +bringing this about. I hear no more of the threatened revolt at +Constantinople. Lord Salisbury writes to tell me he has forced the +Egyptian Government to receive me in Egypt.</p> + +<p>“The old Cashmiri, Abd-el-Rasul, called and showed me a letter +from Zebehr Pasha at Gibraltar and a correspondence he had had with +Lord Granville, and I promised to ask Churchill to intercede. Also +two Indian delegates with a letter from Ragunath Rao.</p> + +<p>“Down to dine and sleep at Milford (my cousin Robert Webb’s +house in Surrey), and found them all in a barn hearing young +Brodrick<a id="FNanchor_131"></a><a href="#Footnote_131" class= +"fnanchor">[131]</a> orating on Church and State. One cannot escape +meetings anywhere now. It was an absurd business: Bob in the chair, +young Brodrick deadly dull; the crowd cutting their country jokes, +and from time to time outside the bellow of a cow, which set all +the meeting off in roars.</p> + +<p>“<em>13th Oct.</em>—Back to London. Saw Randolph at the India +Office at three, and told him of the success of the Newcastle +meeting. He approves of my going on to another at Edinburgh if it +can be arranged. Also he agrees to see Rama Swami and the other +Indian delegates, who called on me a day or two ago to ask my +assistance at the India Office. He has asked me to bring them to +him on Thursday. Moore’s face was a picture when he told him of +this<span class="pagenum" id="Page_495">[495]</span> decision, but +in his light-hearted way Randolph would hear of no objection, and +so it is settled. Then I laid before him a letter I had received +from Calcutta, about a native woman ravished on a steamer—the Webb +case—and he sent Moore to look it up. Lastly, I asked him to +intercede for the release of Zebehr Pasha at Gibraltar. This, too, +he promised to see to, and said he thought it could easily be +managed. There had already been talk of releasing Zebehr, because +the Colonial Office and the War Office could not agree which was to +pay the expense of keeping him. But Egerton had objected at +Cairo—this he told me confidentially. Randolph is looking decidedly +better than he did, and nothing could be nicer than our relations +at present. He volunteered the information that the Austrian and +Russian Governments were both backing up the Sultan to claim his +rights in Roumelia.</p> + +<p>“A letter came to-day from Lord Salisbury, saying that I should +go to the Foreign Office and arrange with Pauncefote<a id= +"FNanchor_132"></a><a href="#Footnote_132" class= +"fnanchor">[132]</a> the details of my affairs in Egypt; and I did +so. Pauncefote was exceedingly polite to me, and I spoke pretty +frankly to him about Baring and Granville in relation to my +exclusion from Egypt. It is a great triumph to have forced this +matter on the Foreign Office, and to be at last invited back to the +official sanctum after all our quarrels. I met Frank Villiers<a id= +"FNanchor_133"></a><a href="#Footnote_133" class= +"fnanchor">[133]</a> later at the club, and laughed about it with +him. Rivers Wilson made a third with us, and we had a grand +discussion about the advantage of truth-telling in politics. They +would neither of them hear of it; but I said: ‘Look at me, if I had +not<span class="pagenum" id="Page_496">[496]</span> made it a rule +to speak the exact truth and have no secrets where should I be +to-day? I have been engaged for the last four years in every kind +of intrigue and yet my name stands clear.’ They laughed at this. +Rivers is still bitter about Arabi, but we drove home together, +good friends as of old.</p> + +<p>“<em>15th Oct.</em>—After luncheon at the Morrises, I took the +three delegates to the India Office, giving them a good sermon +first about the folly it would be for them to hoist a Radical flag +here in England. Anyhow, I think Randolph has converted them, for +he was quite charming to them, putting them at their ease at once. +There was nobody present but ourselves, and the face of the office +messenger when he showed us in was even more comic than Moore’s had +been two days ago. The expression on it was exactly that of the old +steward’s in the ‘Mariage à la Mode.’ Mon Mohun Ghose did most of +the talking; he asked Randolph about the Parliamentary inquiry into +the Government of India and what subjects it would include. +Randolph said it would depend on them to make it a useful one; they +must send over their very best men to give evidence, and take care +they were absolutely accurate about their facts, as there were +plenty of old-fashioned people who did not want existing things +disturbed, and who would pick holes where they could. He said Siva +Prasad had informed him that a royal order to come to England would +override caste difficulties, and that the Benares divines would +decide it in this sense. But Chandar Varkar objected to this, that +Benares could not lay down the law for the whole of India; still he +hoped it might have some effect. Mon Mohun Ghose wanted to know +whether the inquiry would include the judicial system, as that was +what was giving rise just now to most ill feeling. And<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_497">[497]</span> Randolph said that if it +depended on him it should. His colleagues had been most amiable +about this inquiry, and if the Conservatives were in office the +inquiry would be a full and impartial one. He was against members +of the Government sitting on it, but those should be chosen who had +most title to consider Indian affairs, independent men of all +parties. He should support the inquiry, whether he was in office or +not. The inquiry would also include the revenue question, and Rama +Swami explained to him the enhancement of the land revenue +grievance. He begged them to address him again on any special +points they required to make known connected with their respective +Presidencies, and at the end of three quarters of an hour they went +away highly delighted. He told me, at leaving, that I might publish +the result, and I have sent a few lines to the Press Association, +epitomizing the interview. The delegates will also telegraph to +India. This is a great move, and will do excellent work in every +way.</p> + +<p>“<em>18th Oct.</em>—An ultimatum has been sent by Lord Dufferin +to King Thebaw of Burmah. There is a long <em>communiqué</em> in +the ‘Observer’ showing how rich Burmah is, and the wickedness of +Thebaw; this has decided me to write to Churchill and ask +explanations. He is unfortunately out of town. [This ultimatum led +to the iniquitous annexation of Upper Burmah.]</p> + +<p>“Delivered an address in the evening at Islington Hall, Frederic +Harrison in the chair, on ‘Reform in Foreign Policy.’ [This was an +appeal against secrecy and other evils in Foreign Affairs.]</p> + +<p>“<em>20th Oct.</em>—Randolph telegraphs he has been to my house, +and is sorry to miss me. He is just leaving for Lynn, but refers me +to Moore. I travelled up from Crabbet with Frederick Locker, who +says it<span class="pagenum" id="Page_498">[498]</span> will be +unfair if I succeed in Parliament, seeing that I lived idly and +amused myself for forty years, and that I have succeeded too as a +poet.</p> + +<p>“A meeting at the Mansion House for Lady Dufferin’s Indian +Female Doctors’ Fund, for which Randolph had invited me to speak. I +was put up to second Sir Richard Temple; the Anglo-Indians will be +very angry at this. There has been a great row about the Indian +delegates, who have been sat upon by their Radical friends here for +having promised to support me at a meeting in Camberwell, and they +are frightened out of their wits. The Radicals say they won’t allow +them to have anything to do with a Conservative candidate.</p> + +<p>“<em>21st Oct.</em>—Saw Moore at the India Office, who spoke +frankly enough about Burmah. He said that the India Office had been +opposed to intervention for a long while, that Bernard, the +Resident, especially had opposed it, but now saw its necessity, +that great commercial pressure had been put on the Calcutta +Government to take action, and that perhaps Lord Dufferin was not +sorry for so good an excuse at last to settle the matter. ‘An +important point,’ Moore said (and he thought it would convince me), +‘was that <em>it would pay</em>.’ I told him this was precisely the +point which disturbed me. I asked him with whom the responsibility +rested. And he said, entirely with Lord Dufferin; he has had +<em>carte blanche</em> given him in the matter. I said I hoped they +would not imitate the late Government by starting military +operations without declaration of war, and suggested they might +wait till Parliament met. He told me no papers had been published +during the last two years. At leaving he said: ‘I think you may +make your mind comfortable as to there being as much justice and +reason in the case as there ever is in cases of the kind.’ +I<span class="pagenum" id="Page_499">[499]</span> shall attend the +Peace and Arbitration Committee to-morrow.</p> + +<p>“In the evening we had a grand meeting of the Indian Delegates +at Oakley Hall. We got Jemal-ed-Din to deliver a discourse in +Arabic, which no soul in the room understood, but which was much +applauded. Another followed in Persian from Mirza Bakir; and Rama +Swami and Chandar Varkar spoke also. [It shows the absurdity of +London audiences that this was by far the most successful meeting +we had during the canvass.]</p> + +<p>“<em>24th Oct.</em>—Dinner with Hancock and a nest of Radicals +at the Reform Club. I found them all less liberal than I am, +especially about Ireland.</p> + +<p>“<em>25th Oct.</em>—To Hammersmith, where I found Morris laid up +with the gout. He thought things were going wonderfully well for +his ideas, and only hoped the Whigs would not get in with any large +majority. He was inclined to vote for the Tories, but all voting +was against socialistic principles.</p> + +<p>“<em>28th Oct.</em>—Wrote a letter to the ‘Times,’ in protest +against the Burmese War, but shall keep it a day or two to see how +Lord Salisbury answers my appeal to him for the recall of +Arabi.</p> + +<p>“<em>1st Nov.</em>—Called on Lady C. yesterday, who said the +Prince of Wales had told her they were discussing the question of +recalling Arabi at the Foreign Office.</p> + +<p>“Also saw Cardinal Manning. He was sitting very feeble in his +arm-chair, before the fire, with a book screen behind him. It would +make a fine picture. Truly, the only old age worth having is the +old age of religion. He talked to me about Urquhart, who, he said, +had made great efforts to enlist him among his disciples—‘a man of +great personal charm and genius, but mentally not quite sound’; +also<span class="pagenum" id="Page_500">[500]</span> about +Gladstone, ‘who has gone altogether off the track.’ I told him I +had hopes about Arabi’s return under Lord Salisbury but none +whatever under Gladstone, he was too obstinate. ‘He was always like +that,’ the Cardinal said, ‘the most obstinate man in the world; he +never would admit he had ever made a mistake. To understand +Gladstone you must remember he is a Scotchman on his father’s and +mother’s side, only by accident an Englishman, born at +Liverpool.’</p> + +<p>“<em>2nd Nov.</em>—Randolph writes that Lord Salisbury will +certainly not give me an encouraging reply about Arabi: ‘Even if he +was disposed, as I should be, to favour your views, he would not +dare take such a step on the eve of the election.’ This is bad.</p> + +<p>“Jemal-ed-Din, who had been mysteriously absent for two or three +days from James Street, turned up again this morning. He had left +the house in consequence of a noisy disturbance that occurred in +his room on Thursday between two of his Oriental friends, Wahbi Bey +and Abd-el-Rasul; they seem to have quarrelled over politics or +religion and ended by beating each other over the heads with +umbrellas. I had to beg them both to leave the house, and the +Seyyid followed them. One must draw the line somewhere, and I have +now suggested to the Seyyid that he should take up his quarters +elsewhere; he has been three months with me in the house, the full +term of Arab hospitality. [N.B.—This was the last I saw of the good +Seyyid that year; he took huff at my treatment of his friends, and +still more at the disappointment he had had in connection with +Drummond Wolff’s mission, and he left England a few days later in +anger against everything English and, shaking its dust from +his<span class="pagenum" id="Page_501">[501]</span> feet, went away +to Moscow, where he joined himself with Katkoff, the well-known +Panslavist leader in a campaign against the British Empire. From +Russia he moved on to Persia and Afghanistan with the same object, +and, after much preaching and much persecution from the governments +of all these countries, drifted back at last to Constantinople, +where I found him many years later established in the precincts of +the Yildiz Palace, half pensioner, half prisoner of the Sultan. He +died of cancer there, some think of poison, in 1902, nursed, as I +have heard, for sole attendant, by a Christian servant. +Jemal-ed-Din was a man of genius whose teaching exercised an +influence hardly to be overrated on the Mohammedan reform movement +of the last thirty years. I feel highly honoured at his having +lived three months under my roof in England; but he was a wild man, +wholly Asiatic and not easily tamed to European ways. An account of +my subsequent visit to him at Constantinople will be given in its +place.]</p> + +<p>“<em>4th Nov.</em>—There is a telegram from Cairo to-day which +threatens a new expedition against Dongola. I don’t like a speech +Randolph has made on the subject; he also talks nonsense about +fighting for new markets in connection with the Burmese quarrel. I +don’t know what to do; one party is as bad as the other. Lord +Salisbury spoke last night at the Victoria Hall (where I was +present on the platform as one of his chief supporters), and among +other crudities he proposed this remedy of new markets as a relief +for the depression of trade. What nonsense it is when men talk of +‘creating’ wealth by trade. English trade with Oriental nations +means only the transference of Oriental money into English pockets; +trade creates nothing, and one might parody the French +axiom<span class="pagenum" id="Page_502">[502]</span> and say, +<em>Le commerce c’est le vol</em>. Lord Salisbury’s speech was a +poor affair; he does not come out well on occasions like these, +having no sympathy whatever with the people and being unable to +pretend it. He was evidently aware of his false position, and +blundered on from one mistake to another; even in form he was bad, +and it was only towards the end of his speech that he attained to +anything approaching eloquence. Most of it was a House of Lords +reply to his fellow lords, Granville and Hartington, about whom the +South Londoners care less than for the man in the moon. A few good +hits he made, and his audience were quite prepared to applaud +anything, but it fell flat enough considering how great an occasion +it was. The rest of the proceedings were poor, but mercifully +curtailed, as his lordship was anxious to get home to Hatfield.</p> + +<p>“<em>5th Nov.</em>—Guy Fawkes’ Day, the guy this year being King +Thebaw, a sad-looking black monarch in a turban. This Burmese War +is of a piece with all these wars: hungry commercial speculators +making contracts with a dishonest prince, European intrigues, +British remonstrances, official interference, tales to the prince’s +discredit, his subjects praying for British intervention, threats +from Calcutta, appeal of the prince to his people, who strangely +take his side in the quarrel, ultimatum issued, arrival of fleet, +massacre of Europeans, bombardment, slaughter of natives, triumph +of British arms, annexation of territory, pay, prize money, +pensions, peerages all round, and so <em>da capo</em>.</p> + +<p>“<em>6th Nov.</em>—Sent my letter about Burmah to the ‘Times,’ +after calling at the India Office to see if Randolph had any +further explanation to make, but he is out of town. He has +stupidly, as I think, identified himself with Lord Dufferin’s +policy of war.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_503">[503]</span> But +I cannot keep silent on an occasion of this kind.</p> + +<p>“<em>11th Nov.</em>—We have decided to have a large meeting at +Camberwell in favour of Arabi’s recall to Egypt, and I went to see +Randolph to ask him about it and other things. He made a first-rate +speech the other day at Manchester, but looks fagged and several +years older than when he took office. I talked to him first about +the Soudan, and asked him if anything had been done in the way of +negotiations. And he said that Mukhtar, the Ottoman commissioner, +and Wolff were going to do what they could to pacificate; that +already something had been begun; that Wolff quite understood the +necessity of dealing through Arab channels; that he had discovered +that if the Sultan was influenced by anybody it was by the Arab +Sheykhs, and, finally, that Mukhtar was the man Wolff himself had +wished for, and that all would be done that could be done. All the +same, there was imminent prospect of more fighting. I told him of +the papers I had sent in to Lord Salisbury, and of the meeting we +are getting up for the recall of Arabi. And he highly approved. He +said: ‘I am doing all I can with Lord Salisbury to get him to +recall Arabi. But his prejudices are strong and I shall be glad to +have support from outside.’ About the Burmese war I said that I +hoped he did not disapprove of my letter to the ‘Times,’ but I was +obliged to write it, as I could not afford not to be true to my +principles, which were to me what her virtue is to a woman. He said +he thought it quite right, and hoped I should pull my election +through.”<a id="FNanchor_134"></a><a href="#Footnote_134" class= +"fnanchor">[134]</a></p> + +<p>This proved to be my last talk with Churchill on our familiar +and intimate footing as political allies. In another fortnight the +elections had been fought<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_504">[504]</span> and lost and won; then came Gladstone’s +unexpected pronouncement in favour of Home Rule, and we followed +different paths, and I saw Churchill no more that year, or at all +as friends politically.</p> + +<p>To end the story of the Camberwell election briefly: on the 12th +November I finally declared for Home Rule in its full sense, +avowing my intention in so many words of supporting Parnell in his +demand for an Irish Parliament. I felt bound to do this, but I +believe it cost me my election. All the last fortnight was occupied +in heavy work, of which my wife, with her maid Cowie and my private +secretary Hope, an excellent young man, took the lion’s share, and +I was helped by many personal friends from outside, notably by the +Meynells and Pollens, and by an excellent old-fashioned Radical +banker from St. Ives, Mr. Tebbutt, who came on principle to canvass +for me because of my views on foreign policy, and the Rev. Hugh +Chapman of St. Luke’s, now chaplain to the Savoy. But their devoted +labours proved of no avail, and I lost the election by 162 votes +out of 6,112 votes polled.</p> + +<p class="center med space-above2">THE END.</p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_505">[505]</span><a id= +"c13"></a>NOTE ABOUT THE MAHDI’S DEATH</h2> + +<p class="dcap space-above15">THE policy finally decided on by Lord +Salisbury in July, 1885, of completing the evacuation of the Soudan +and leaving it to “stew in its own juice” till such time as it +could be reconquered in English interests, was a Macchiavellian +one, and resulted successfully from the point of view of imperial +ambition. The decision was come to simultaneously with Mohammed +Ahmed’s death, which I thought at the time, and still think, was +not wholly a natural one. His death was due, according to the +official account, to small-pox, but there were too many interests +engaged at Cairo and Constantinople just then not to make it +extremely probable that there was another agency at work to procure +a solution so simple and so timely. The Mahdi’s was a great +personality, commanding unbounded respect in the Soudan, and +inspiring the religious hopes of Mohammedan Egypt as that of a +possible deliverer from Christian domination, while beyond Egypt it +had become a rival influence obnoxious to the Ottoman Caliphate. +There are too many examples of such deaths procured for political +ends in the time of Sultan Abdul Hamid and of the Khedivate to make +the suspicion in the present instance unreasonable; and it must be +remembered that with the Drummond Wolff mission a new opportunity +was presenting itself at Constantinople, to which the life of the +Mahdi was a chief obstacle. Be this as it may, it is certain that +the blow dealt by Mohammed Ahmed’s death was fatal to the future of +the Soudan as that of a permanently powerful theocracy. The Khalifa +Abdallah el Taishi, who succeeded him in supreme rule, was a man +wholly inferior intellectually<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_506">[506]</span> and politically to his master, and under +him religious enthusiasm waned and tribal rivalries took the place +of a united front against the enemy, while also the wisdom was +lacking for the conclusion of an effective peace on lines of +commercial intercourse with Egypt. There was always the excuse at +Cairo that the Khalifa was impracticable to treat with. The story, +however, of the reconquest of Khartoum twelve years later is beyond +the scope of the present volume, as is any appreciation of the +actual condition of the Soudan under English rule, and I leave both +reluctantly for another occasion.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">W. S. B.</p> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<div class="page"> +<p class="center large space-above"><a id="app"></a><span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_507">[507]</span>APPENDICES</p> +</div> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_509">[509]</span><a id= +"appa"></a>APPENDIX A</h2> + +<p class="sch1">UNPUBLISHED GORDON PAPERS</p> + +<p class="center space-below1"><span class="sc">Colonel Donnelly’s +Conversation with Colonel C. G. Gordon, 30th October 1880 (from +among Sir Henry Gordon’s papers)</span> +</p> + +<p class="dcap">THIS was the first time I had seen Colonel Gordon +since he left England as Lord Ripon’s private secretary. I asked +him what was the real reason of his giving up. He gave me to +understand a number of things made him feel that he was <em>de +trop</em>. “For instance,” he said, “just after we started, Lord +Ripon gave me the minutes and evidence in the inquiry into Yakub +Khan’s connection with Cavagnari’s murder, and asked me to make a +<em>précis</em> and give him my opinion. This was difficult. But +after sitting up the greater part of two nights I was able to give +them back with my remarks all over them in red and black ink. He +asked me what I thought of it. I said I did not see any evidence to +prove Yakub guilty; he very likely was glad Cavagnari was murdered, +but I could see nothing to show that he was implicated in the +crime, and you know (to me, Donnelly) three out of five of the +Council (mentioning their names) were of that opinion.</p> + +<p>“Lord Ripon looked into it and told me to telegraph from Aden to +his, Yakub’s, keepers to meet him at Bombay. I said: ‘My Lord, I +think that will hardly do as you have not yet been sworn in and +Lord Lytton is still Governor General and may make a great fuss.’ +Lord Ripon agreed, thought I was right and said the telegram was +not to be sent. When we got to Bombay Lord Ripon again asked me to +telegraph to Yakub’s keepers to meet him at some station on the way +to Simla. I had to ask White (military secretary) as I did not know +the route sufficiently to fix on a station. He was awfully taken +aback. Did I know what the consequences would be? Every one in +India would be staggered and so on. Begged me to persuade Lord +Ripon not to take such a step. I told him that it did not seem to +me it would make any difference one way or the other, but as he was +so very strong on the point, I said I would let Lord Ripon know +before I did anything. I wrote a note and sent it in early in the +morning to Lord Ripon, saying that I myself did not think it would +matter, but, as White was so very anxious on the subject, believing +the end of the world would come if such a step were taken, I +thought<span class="pagenum" id="Page_510">[510]</span> it as well +to let him know before I carried out his, Lord Ripon’s, +instructions. This was just before breakfast, and he came out in a +few minutes very indignant that any one should have ventured to +overrule his orders; he had no intention of being controlled, and +so on. All breakfast time he looked quite hurt, and injured, and +indignant. After breakfast I left White talking with him in a +beseeching way, and presently he (Lord Ripon) came and asked me if +I had sent the telegram. I said No, I was waiting to see White to +settle the place. ‘Well,’ he said, ‘perhaps after all it was as +well not to send it.’</p> + +<p>“Now this is only one instance,” Gordon said. “There were lots +of snubs of this kind. You know I shouldn’t have minded getting +snubbed, if there was any use in it—but I saw it was only sure to +get worse. Lord Ripon was being surrounded and guided by the very +people from whom Lord Northcote had begged me to keep him clear. +When he got to Simla I was sure he would be completely in the hands +of the Lytton party. I felt I was <em>de trop</em> and could do no +good, and that it was as well to give up as soon as possible. I +told Lord Ripon so. He was very nice about it, said that his regard +for me had only been increased by what had happened, but he saw it +was advisable I should resign, was much obliged to me for doing so, +was only afraid of the awkwardness. I showed him the letter I had +written. He said I was giving him too great praise and taking all +the blame on myself—did not wish me to publish it. But I said I had +written it; it was too much trouble to write it again. And so I +sent it. We parted on the best of terms. He said he had a greater +regard for me than ever, and so on. In fact I have no doubt he was +much relieved by being rid of me.”</p> + +<p>The opinion Gordon gave Lord Ripon on the Afghan question was +this. He said either Yakub Khan was guilty or not. If he was not, +and there was no reason for saying he was (<em>vide</em> secret +papers, Court of Enquiry on Yakub Khan), he ought in justice to be +restored. And moreover he was the only man who was likely to be +able to hold the country who had any following. “‘Take him back +yourself, my Lord. You can easily do it with 3,000 cavalry. If you +succeed, you will be looked upon as the greatest Governor-General +India ever had, and if you fail and are killed you will have a +splendid marble monument put up to you.’ But Lord Ripon did not +seem to see the monument. I offered to do it myself with Yakub and +some lakhs of rupees. But they would not have it. What was the use +of my being there? There was no one who cared to look forward and +have a policy, only to let things drift.”</p> + +<p>As to Candahar, Gordon’s opinion was that we ought to give +in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_511">[511]</span> to the Ruler of +Afghanistan if we wished him to hold the country. The position of +Candahar with relation to Herat and Cabul was such [here a diagram +is given] that it was impossible for any man to really rule the +country unless he held Candahar. But he thought we had managed our +withdrawal from Cabul very badly. We had been in such a hurry as to +look like running away. Our prestige in India had been much shaken +by the Maimand disaster, and Roberts had only been able to get at +Ayoub Khan’s rearguard. As an illustration of our loss of prestige +in India, he gave an incident which occurred lately. When the +Russian gunboats were in the harbour of Bombay, the Parsees brought +their children to see them and to be introduced to the Russian +officers.</p> + +<p>Things were constantly happening which must have made his +presence—to say the least—irksome with a man of Lord Ripon’s +calibre of mind. For instance, the day before they started [from +London], Lord Houghton was lunching with Lord Ripon, Gordon kept +away till after lunch was over. But Lord Houghton was still there +when he came in. On being introduced by Lord Ripon, Lord Houghton +said he was delighted to hear he was going as private secretary; he +could not congratulate Lord Ripon too highly on his great good luck +in having such a secretary; he was very glad Lord Ripon was going +as Governor-General, but almost more glad that Gordon was going as +his secretary.</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Earl of Northbrook to General C. +G. Gordon</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right"><em>Jan.</em> 18, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear General</span>,</p> + +<p>I enclose a letter to Sir William Hewett. We have written +officially to him by this mail announcing your mission, and +authorizing him to meet your demands up to £1,000 upon your +receipts. I am sure you will like Hewett. As there is no +telegraphic communication with Suakin we shall arrange for the +Helicon to be at Suez from Malta to take you to Suakin. If she +should not be available you will have to put up with the Cygnet, +but she is not nearly so comfortable as the Helicon.</p> + +<p>I will telegraph to you to Port Said to say which arrangement +has been made, to the care of the senior officer.</p> + +<p>I was very glad to see you in such good heart about affairs this +afternoon, and I trust that by God’s blessing you will succeed in +arranging them as satisfactorily as circumstances admit.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch8">Yours very sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Northbrook</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_512">[512]</span><span class="sc">General C. G. Gordon to +Miss Gordon</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">19. 1. 84.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Augusta</span>,</p> + +<p>I arrived in town very tired at 6 a.m. yesterday, went with +Brockenhurst to Barracks, washed and went [to] Wolseley, he said +Ministers would see me at 3 p.m. I went back to Barracks and +reposed. At 12.30 p.m. Wolseley came for me. I went with him and +saw Granville, Hartington, Dilke and Northbrook; they said had I +seen W. and did I understand their ideas. I said yes, and repeated +what W. had said to me as to their ideas, which was “<em>they would +evacuate Soudan</em>.” They were pleased and said, “that was their +idea. Would I go?” I said “yes.” They said “when?” I said +“To-night.” And it was over. I started at 8 p.m. H.R.H. [Cambridge] +and Lord W. [Wolseley] came to see me off. I saw Henry [Sir H. +Gordon] and Bob [R. F. Gordon], no one else except Stokes, all very +kind. I have taken Stewart with me, a nice fellow, we are now in +train near Mont Cenis. I am not moved a bit, and hope to do the +people good. Will you tell Sir J. Cowell all this. Lord Granville +said Ministers were very much obliged to me. I said I was much +honoured by going. I telegraphed King [of Belgians] at once, and +told him to wait a few months. Kindest love Mina, Helen and +yourself, A. Burton, and Hayter and Ellen [these two were servants +at Rockstone Place].</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">Believe me, my dear Augusta, yr. +affect. brother</p> + +<p class="right">C. G. <span class="sc">Gordon</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p><em>Address</em>—Care H.M. Consul Suez.</p> +</div> + +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Memorandum as to General +Gordon’s doings in Cairo, January 1884, by Colonel [Sir Charles] +Watson (from Sir Henry Gordon’s papers)</span> +</p> + +<p class="space-above15">On Saturday the 19th January when I went +into Sir Evelyn Wood’s room at the War Office he said, “Embrace +me.” I said, “What has happened?” He said, “The English Government +is sending General Gordon out to settle the affairs of the Soudan, +and he started from London last night with Colonel Stewart by the +Brindisi Mail.” I said, “That is the best thing I have heard for +the last year. Is it to be made public, or is it still a secret?” +He said, “It is to be made as public as possible, tell everybody.” +Then we did some ordinary business, and I went to my own office. +Colonel Bruce Campbell was there, having come as usual for the +latest information. He said, “What news have you for me?” I +replied, “The newest and best is that General Gordon is coming out +to settle the Soudan, and is now on his way.” He said, +“I<span class="pagenum" id="Page_513">[513]</span> don’t believe +it. The English Government will never let him come.” “Well,” I +said, “I think you’ll see it’s true.” Then he went away.</p> + +<p>That evening I had to take some papers to Nubar’s house for him +to sign. Soon after I went in he said, “I am to be congratulated. +The weight of the Soudan is off my shoulders. If any one can manage +it, Gordon can.” He really did seem glad that Gordon was coming +out, which was good of him considering the abusive way in which +Gordon had both written and spoken of him.</p> + +<p>The next day Nubar stopped me in the street to talk about Bashi +Bazouks, who had come to Cairo and were troubling him about their +pay, and he again repeated how glad he was that Gordon was coming +out. The following day every one was talking about it; several +Egyptians said, “Finished with the Mahdi.” But that was too hopeful +a view. I had to see Major Vincent about the War Office budget, in +which he was very eager to make more economies, and he asked how +much money was Gordon likely to want for taking all the people out +of the Soudan and settling up the affairs there. I said that Gordon +couldn’t answer that question himself, that there was no doubt that +he would do the job better and cheaper than any one else. Sir +Evelyn Baring seemed hopeful and said, “That it was specially +understood that Gordon was under the English and not under the +Egyptian Government, and that therefore he would be under him +[Baring] and not under Nubar. But,” he added smiling, “not that it +is very likely that Gordon will take orders from me or any one +else.”</p> + +<p>The next day, the 22nd, Sir Evelyn Wood said to me, “Gordon is +coming out with the intention of going straight through the Canal +and on to Suakin, without coming to Cairo; I can quite understand +his not liking to come to Cairo, but it is very important he should +see Baring before going to the Soudan, and it would look badly if +he did not call on the Khedive. I shall therefore go down to Port +Said to-morrow to meet and try to bring him up to Cairo, and I want +you to come with me. Nubar has arranged for a boat and train to +bring him up here.”</p> + +<p>That day there was a telegram from Slatin Bey in Darfour, +stating that he was constantly being attacked by the Mahdi’s +people, that his ammunition was running out, his soldiers were +getting demoralized, and he had had to shoot several of them, and +he could not hold out much longer unless ammunition and +reinforcements were sent him. It was arranged to send a telegram to +Dongola to be sent to him as soon as possible, telling him that +General Gordon was going to the Soudan to withdraw all the Egyptian +troops, and everybody else who wished to leave. This<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_514">[514]</span> message was to be sent to the +Mudir of Dongola with orders to send it on by several different +messengers, so as to make sure of Slatin Bey getting it.</p> + +<p>In the afternoon Sir E. Wood asked me to see Nubar to make sure +that the necessary arrangements had been made for bringing Gordon +quickly up from Port Said. Nubar looked very tired and spoke +French, said he was too tired to talk in English. He sent for +Tigrane who looked very sulky, but it was not clear whether it was +because Gordon was coming out, or because he was not so important a +man as in Cherif’s time. Nubar gave him orders to see that +everything was ready for Gordon’s journey, and said that no expense +would be spared to send him to Khartoum in the shortest possible +time, as the sooner he got there, the sooner things would be +settled. That night we dined at Sir E. Baring’s, a regular Consular +dinner—Austrian, Russian, Netherlands, etc. I was sitting next +Tigrane, who would hardly say a word; he does not seem quite to +approve of the advance of English ideas. Nubar on the contrary, who +was also there, seemed very cheerful. It will be curious to see +whether Tigrane will continue to work with Nubar or not. Other +people came in after dinner for dancing.</p> + +<p>The next morning Sir E. Wood sent to me to say that he was +unhappy about Slatin Bey and the people in Darfour, and asked me to +ask Nubar not to send the message to Dongola until Gordon had +arrived. Nubar was not in his office, and I waited a good while in +Tigrane’s room, who was much more talkative than the night before. +He said he was not let to do anything now, and that Nubar and Sir +E. Baring managed everything. He seemed rather doubtful of the +success of Gordon’s mission to the Soudan, on account of the power +that the Mahdi had up there.</p> + +<p>At 11.30 Sir E. Wood and I started for Ismaïlia, and arrived +there about 5 p.m. Sir Evelyn was rather uneasy in his mind about +Gordon, as he thought it might be difficult to persuade him to come +to Cairo. At Ismaïlia we were met by the Governor and other +Notables, and went straight over to the pier, where a steam launch +was waiting to take us to Port Said; among others who were there +was Khalil Agha, an Albanian policeman, who had been with me in the +campaign, and who had now charge of the roads and gardens at +Ismaïlia. A little French red faced doctor begged for a passage as +he had been telegraphed for from Port Said. We started at once and +reached Port Said at 11.30 p.m. A lot of people met us, and +accompanied Sir Evelyn to the Hôtel des Pays Bas, where rooms had +been engaged for him by the Governor.</p> + +<p>Next morning I went to the P. and O. Office and saw Mr. Roy, who +said that the “Tanjore” from Brindisi would not be in +till<span class="pagenum" id="Page_515">[515]</span> the afternoon, +but he was proved to be wrong, for half an hour afterwards she was +in sight, and, by the time we had finished breakfast, and Sir +Evelyn had inspected the company of the 8th Battalion stationed at +Port Said, the “Tanjore” was in the harbour close to H.M.S. +“Carysfort,” which had been sent from Malta to take General Gordon +to Suakin, and was now waiting for him with steam up ready to +start. Our steam launch was at the pier, and we went out to the +“Tanjore” at once. General Gordon was on the poop talking to Col. +Stewart. A minute served to make him and Sir E. Wood acquainted +with one another, and at the same moment the English Consul put +into General Gordon’s hands a bundle of cipher telegrams from Lord +Granville and Sir E. Baring, and Col. Stewart and I went down at +once into the saloon to decipher them. The Captain of the +“Carysfort” came on board to report his ship ready, and Sir E. Wood +seemed at first a little doubtful how to break the intelligence to +General Gordon that he was expected to come to Cairo instead of +going to Suakin as he intended, but the latter proved quite +amenable, and as soon as he was told that the steam launch was +alongside to take him to Ismaïlia, said he was ready to start at +once; so their baggage was put in, and in five minutes we were +steaming to Ismaïlia somewhat to the astonishment of the Captain of +the “Carysfort,” who expected to have taken the General with him. +Stewart and I continued deciphering the telegrams, which were all +to the same effect, that General Gordon had better go to Cairo +while he and Sir Evelyn Wood were becoming acquainted with one +another. It was curious to think that Gordon had sent Sir Evelyn to +Egypt, while Sir Evelyn had really been the means of getting Gordon +sent to the Soudan.</p> + +<p>Although Gordon had started so readily for Cairo, he at first +seemed of opinion it would have been better if he had gone to +Suakin to make friends with the chief of the tribes who were +fighting against Baker. He seemed to have little doubt of the +practicability of the scheme, but, as he might not have been able +to get by that road to Khartoum, and as the main thing was to get +him to that place as soon as possible, there is little doubt it was +better for him to go by the Nile valley. The five hours to Ismaïlia +were employed by Sir E. Wood making Gordon fully acquainted with +the state of affairs in Egypt and the Soudan. At five o’clock we +reached Ismaïlia and went at once to the station, where a special +train was ready to take Gordon to Cairo. In the carriage was +Mahommed Bey Tuhami, who had formerly been Gordon’s secretary in +the Soudan, and who had been sent down by Gordon’s request to meet +him. He is jet black and now quite blind, having lost his sight on +the White Nile, whither Gordon<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_516">[516]</span> sent him for taking bakshish to the extent +of £3,000. This did not prevent his being very glad to see his old +master again, and his pleasure was increased when Gordon put £100 +into his hands. He is a wonderful old man, very clear-headed about +the Soudan, knowing nearly every chief by name. He said that Mousa, +the chief of the Hadendowa, whom Gordon had hoped to meet at Suakin +[was away] and that his son Mohammed was at Kassala with part of +the tribe, while the rest of it had left him, and with the Halega +tribe under Osman Digna were fighting against Baker at Suakin. It +is possible, therefore, that Gordon might not have found it as easy +as he thought to get through that way. Tuhami was of opinion that a +great many people in the Soudan would be very glad to hear of +Gordon’s arrival, and that many of those who had joined the Mahdi +on account of their hatred of the Egyptian Government would leave +him. He repeatedly insisted that the rebellion was rather against +bad Government than a religious revolt.</p> + +<p>The train reached Cairo at 9 o’clock, but there were not many +waiting to receive the General as we were not due till half an hour +later. Gordon went off with Sir E. Wood. After he had started Nubar +Pasha and the Khedive’s first aide-de-camp came up just too late to +receive him.</p> + +<p>The next morning Mohammed Tuhami came to our house with a clerk, +Abo El Melik Shai, and at once set to work to write telegrams to a +number of the Notable people in the Soudan, informing them that +Gordon was going up to bring peace to the country. During the +morning one Arab after another came in until there were seven or +eight at work. Gordon looked in for a few minutes, but spent most +of the time with Sir E. Baring, Sir E. Wood and Nubar. He also went +to see the Khedive, and said he had been very humble and made it up +with him. He arranged with him that Abd el Shakoor, the son of Abd +el Kader, one of the late Sultans of Darfour, was to be sent back +to that country. This had been proposed by Gordon years ago. The +Khedive would never agree to it before. In the afternoon Abd el +Shakoor looked in, and the meeting between him and Tuhami was very +interesting. It should be remembered that Tuhami was secretary to +Ismael Pasha Ayoub when he as Governor-General of the Soudan +conquered Darfour, or to speak more correctly when Zebehr Rahama +conquered it for him and killed the Sultan. The young man, Abd el +Shakoor, seems intelligent, but at first sight does not show the +strength of character which he would require. Gordon came in and +told him he was to start with him the next night. The young man +asked for a few days delay to collect his family, but Gordon cut +him short, saying, “Look, you want a throne, throne +first,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_517">[517]</span> family +afterwards.” Tuhami and the other clerks did not finish their work +until late.</p> + +<p>After dinner I went over to Sir E. Wood’s to see Gordon, who had +just gone; Sir E. was sitting with Slade, and was very low. Gordon, +who before he left London had protested in the strongest manner +against sending Zebehr to the Soudan, had that evening written a +paper to show why it would be a good thing to take Zebehr with him. +Sir E. said he had a great respect for Gordon, but he really could +not change his opinion entirely in twelve hours. I said it was not +the least surprising, as it was very usual for Gordon to change his +opinion on the smallest provocation; but in this case I was sure it +would all come right, and that Zebehr would not go. In the same +paper he expressed a wish that Zebehr and he might be confronted +with one another in order that the former might bring any +accusation against him he thought fit.</p> + +<p>Leaving Sir E. I went home and found Gordon, who seemed equally +low. He said he had been talking all day and was quite done. Speedy +was also at our house, and he and Gordon had been having an +argument about King John of Abyssinia. He rather took King John’s +part, while Gordon said he was a man on whom no reliance could be +placed. Gordon said King John had never stated what he wants, and +that if he had a port he wouldn’t know what to do with it. He said, +however, he might have Senheit and Gallabat, and free trade at +Massowah.</p> + +<p>The next morning Tuhami came again and wrote a proclamation for +Gordon to distribute in the Soudan. Gordon stopped at our house for +a couple of hours, during which time a great many people, +principally Egyptians, came to see him. The majority were persons +whom he had known before, and who wished to go up to the Soudan +with him. He refused all the applications, and the only two he +agreed to take with him were Ibrahim Bey Fawzi, who had formerly +been with him in the Soudan, and Ibrahim Effendi Ruchdi, whom he +took as clerks. Ibrahim Bey Fawzi had been promoted by Gordon to +every grade from Lieutenant to Colonel, and regarded Gordon as his +Father. He had also at one time been in disgrace with Gordon, and +had been put in chains. During the Egyptian campaign Ibrahim Fawzi +had been with the rebels at Abou Kir, and had been without +employment since the disbandment of the old Egyptian army. Ibrahim +Ruchdi was a Khartoum clerk, who had been temporarily employed in +the Soudan office in Cairo. Gordon took him back to the Soudan at +an increased rate of pay, <em>i.e.</em>, £20 a month. A little +later in the morning a deputation of merchants interested in the +Soudan commerce came to present Gordon with an address, and to beg +that he would do what he could to protect the interests of +Soudan<span class="pagenum" id="Page_518">[518]</span> merchants. +He replied to them that he had been sent out from England by the +English Government with a definite object, viz., to withdraw the +Egyptian Government from the Soudan; that they all knew that the +Egyptian Government in the Soudan was bad, and had been used to +oppress the people; that the present state of affairs could not +continue, but that he would do his best to set up some system of +self-government in the Soudan. After the deputation retired, +General Gordon went out, and I went to the War Office and arranged +for lithographing the proclamation alluded to above.</p> + +<p>General Gordon and Colonel Stewart lunched with us. Giegler +Pasha came in afterwards and we all went to Sir E. Baring’s, with +whom were Nubar Pasha and Sir Evelyn Wood. Sir Evelyn Baring said +that General Gordon had expressed a wish that certain matters +between him and Zebehr Pasha might be discussed, and Zebehr Pasha +was called in. Gordon and Zebehr sat near one another, with an +interpreter between, and Zebehr Pasha was asked what he had to say. +He said that Gordon without cause had confiscated his property, had +put his people in chains, and had caused his son to be killed, that +when Gordon had gone to the Soudan he (Zebehr) had put his hand on +his (Gordon’s) hand and had asked him to consider his son as his +own son. Then General Gordon said that he had confiscated the +property of Zebehr because he had been convicted by a court of +enquiry at Khartoum of having instigated his son to revolt against +the Government, that the conviction was to a certain extent based +upon a letter written from Zebehr to his son and found among the +latter’s (Suliman’s) papers. <em>Zebehr</em>: “I never wrote such a +letter. You should produce it as proof of what you say.” +<em>General Gordon</em>: “I cannot produce the letter as it was +attached to the proceedings of the court and sent with the latter +to his Highness the Khedive. If the proceedings can be found the +letter should be found with them.” <em>Zebehr</em>: “If the letter +can be found I deserve to lose my head,” and he drew his hand +across his throat. <em>Gordon</em>: “If the letter was not written, +I was not justified in what I did.” Then Sir Evelyn Baring said +that he would see that the “proceedings” were looked for, and he +directed Sir E. Wood to endeavour to find them. Then +<em>Zebehr</em> said to Gordon: “And you killed my son, although I +had specially entrusted him to your care.” <em>Gordon</em>: “I did +take care of your son and I had him promoted to the rank of Bey, +and then afterwards he treacherously killed 200 Egyptian soldiers +in the Bahr Gazal.” <em>Zebehr</em> fenced with the question for +some time and at last said: “I was no longer responsible for my +son, you had made him a Bey, you were responsible.” Then <em>Sir E. +Baring</em> said that “apparently there<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_519">[519]</span> were two questions between Zebehr and +Gordon, the first concerning Zebehr himself which turned on the +existence of a certain letter which would be searched for, that if +Zebehr was proved not to be guilty he would see that compensation +was made to him for his losses; the second question concerned +Zebehr’s son, for whose action it now appeared Zebehr did not hold +himself responsible.” Zebehr stood up and made a speech mainly to +the effect that the name of England and the justice of England were +known to all nations, and that he would leave all in the hands of +his Excellency. Zebehr then left the room. Sir E. Baring said that +the next point to discuss was whether Zebehr Pasha was to go to the +Soudan or not, as General Gordon had suggested the advisability of +his going. General Gordon said: “I had better not be here while you +are discussing that. Hear what Watson has to say.” And he went out. +Sir E. Baring asked me what I had to say, and I answered that I +considered it would be the greatest possible mistake to let Zebehr +go to the Soudan with Gordon, and that, if my own opinion was of no +value, I had been requested by one who knew the Soudan well to do +all I could to prevent his going, as it was almost certain that one +or the other would not come back alive. Sir E. Wood also said that +he did not think it advisable for Zebehr to go, and Nubar Pasha +expressed the same opinion, but more mildly. Nubar gave me the idea +that for some reason or other he was annoyed at having Zebehr’s +affairs stirred up again and wanted it to relapse into oblivion as +soon as possible. Gordon and Zebehr were then called in again, and +Sir E. Baring informed the latter that it was considered desirable +he should not at present go to the Soudan, but that the question of +his return and of his position generally would be discussed as soon +as General Gordon had returned in safety. Soon after, every one +went away.</p> + +<p>That evening there was a large dinner at Sir E. Wood’s, Nubar +Pasha, Abd el Kader, etc., etc. At 9 o’clock we drove to Boulac +Dakrour station to see Gordon off, his train was to start at 9.30, +but at the last minute it appeared that Abd el Shakoor, the Sultan +of Darfour, in place of coming with two or three people as Gordon +had arranged, had brought all his family and followers, nearly +fifty in number. Gordon did not like to leave them behind, so fresh +carriages were put on, and the people and baggage were tumbled into +the train, which started at 10.30. During the following days Tuhami +brought me several papers respecting affairs in the Soudan, which +he asked me to send to General Gordon for his guidance.</p> + +<p>Cairo, <em>10th Feb.</em>, 1884.</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_520">[520]</span><span class="sc">General Sir Gerald Graham +to Sir Henry Gordon</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Saxon, <em>Feb. 4th</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir Henry</span>,</p> + +<p>I have been accompanying your brother as far as Korusko and seen +him start off on his journey across the desert. He is much more +cheery and confident than he was when he left Cairo, and looks +forward to constructing a government and army out of native +materials as if it were the simplest thing in the world. He has +certainly an extraordinary influence over the natives, the secret +of which seems to me to be that he is really fond of them and +enters into their feelings, while he at the same time shows an +energy that must appear to them superhuman. . . .</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Gerald Graham</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">General C. G. Gordon to Monsieur +de Moutardin, Rue Rogate, No. 7, Paris (from Sir Henry Gordon’s +papers)</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Apparently translated from the French.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Khartoum, 5 <em>Novr.</em> 84.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>Thank you for your letter 25 August received yesterday by a spy, +and also for your good wishes for our security. The Arabs are +tranquil enough, they are at the South and S.W. and East, but +otherwise they are not. We are in much vicissitude. I regret +sensibly that your Consul, Mr. Harbin, who went down in a steamer +with Colonel Stewart, and Mr. Power, English Consul, after an +uproar were killed <em>en route</em> with the other M.M. I do not +understand, for the steamer had been blinded, had a gun and a good +force. They left here the 10th of September. I had them escorted +below Berber, and they ought to have been at Dongola the 20th +September, but an officer has informed me that on the 14th October +they had not arrived there. It is very grievous. Excuse a longer +letter, for I have so many things to do.</p> + +<p>Believe me my dear M. de Moutardin, Yours sincerely,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">C. G. <span class="sc">Gordon</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p class="space-above15">P.S. You say to me, “Expedition for my +relief,” thank you, no,—“Expedition for the relief of the garrisons +of the Soudan,” <em>that is the title</em> you understand, is it +not? I was sent to succour the garrisons of the Soudan, I have +failed, they sent the Troops to make up for the failure on my part. +Slatin Bey is with the Mahdi 8 miles distant from here, he is well +and has become Muslim, as they say is the case with all the +Europeans! The time of Martyrs for the faith is ended!</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_521">[521]</span><span class="sc">Sir Charles Watson to Sir +Henry Gordon</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">War Office, Cairo, 24. 2. 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir Henry</span>,</p> + +<p>Since posting my letter to you I have had forwarded to me from +Korti a letter from your brother dated 14. 12. 84. It is sad to get +it, but I thought you would like a copy, so send one. He evidently +knew there was treachery at work in Khartoum some time before it +fell. The last paragraph concerns some small commissions I did for +him, it is of no consequence. The letter was given to Sir Charles +Wilson at Gubat by Kashim el Moos, who commanded the steamers. So +Wilson must have had an anxious time going up. He would have done +anything to save your brother, and must have felt there was no hope +before he left Khartoum behind him. It is a sad story, but I cannot +help envying your brother,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch6">Ever yours sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right">C. M. <span class="sc">Watson</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p class="space-above15">I have shown the letter to Sir F. +Stephenson and Sir E. Baring. The latter took a copy of it.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p><em>Enclosure.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Khartoum, 14. 12. 84.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Watson</span>,</p> + +<p>I think the game is up and send Mrs. Watson, you and Graham my +adieux. We may expect a catastrophe in the town in or after 10 days +time. This would not have happened (if it does happen) if our +people had taken better precautions as to informing us of their +movements. But this is “spilt milk,” good bye. Mind and let my +brother (68, Elm Park Road, Chelsea) know what I owe you.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch10">Yours sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right">C. G. <span class="sc">Gordon</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p class="space-above15">The above was received at Gubat by Sir C. +Wilson on the 22 January 1885.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Sir Charles Watson to Sir Henry +Gordon</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">War Office, Cairo, 10. 3. 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir Henry</span>,</p> + +<p>Since last writing to you I have had a second letter from your +brother, but of earlier date than the one of which I sent you +a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_522">[522]</span> copy. I am so +often asked for copies of it that I have had it lithographed in +facsimile, and enclose you a copy of it. You will see he speaks +strongly about the government, and he had reason. Why was not +General Graham allowed to go on last year? But it is not much use +talking about it now. I only hope that the government will at last +realize that the Soudan business is a large one that will take +years to settle. I have seen young Anderson of the artillery. He +started for Souakim yesterday with General Graham.</p> + +<p>I hope you are all well,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch5">Yours very sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right">C. M. <span class="sc">Watson</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p><em>Enclosure in Facsimile.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Kartum, 26. 11. 84.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Watson</span>,</p> + +<p>Thanks for your letter which I received yesterday, the steamer +which brought it, had to run the gauntlet of no end of rifle fire +and of 6 guns, she was struck 3 times by shells, but only 7 were +wounded. I hope you and Mrs. Watson are well. I am not ill-treated +I consider, but the Cairo people up here they are the ill used. I +will accept <em>nothing whatever</em> from Gladstone’s Government. +I will not even let them pay my expenses. I will get the King to +pay them. I will never put foot in England again—but will +(<span class="sc2">D.V.</span> if I get out) go to Brussels and so +on to Congo. How is Miss Arnott, the lady who was with me? I +greatly fear for Stewart, Power and Herbin, French Consul. With +kindest regards, believe me yours sincerely, with kindest regards +to Mrs. Watson,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">C. G. <span class="sc">Gordon</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Last Telegram from General +Gordon (from among Mrs. Moffitt’s papers)</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right pad-rightch3">Junior United Service Club,</p> + +<p class="right pad-rightch7">London, S.W.</p> + +<p class="right">8 <em>June</em> 1886.</p> +</div> + +<p>An Egyptian Clerk, who was taken prisoner by the rebels at the +fall of Khartoum, and at last succeeded in effecting his escape +from Omdurman, gave me a copy of an Arabic telegram of which he +said the following was the story.</p> + +<p>On or about the 29th December 1884, General Gordon dictated this +telegram to him. It was written on a small piece of paper. General +Gordon then took a cartridge, took out the bullet and shook the +gunpowder out of it. He then folded up the telegram, put it in the +cartridge in place of the powder, and replaced the<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_523">[523]</span> bullet, so that the cartridge +looked as if it had not been touched. General Gordon then gave it +to a messenger who put it with his other cartridges and started for +Dongola.</p> + +<p>I have never heard that he arrived, neither have I any means of +confirming the truth of the clerk’s story. It seems, however, very +unlikely that he should have invented such a tale, or have written +the telegram himself.</p> + +<p>The translation of the telegram is as follows:</p> + +<p class="space-above15">“To the Sovereign of the Kingdom.</p> + +<p>“After salutations. I would at once, calling to mind what I have +gone through, inform their Majesties the Sovereigns of the actions +of Great Britain and the Ottoman Empire, who appointed me as +Governor-General of the Soudan for the purpose of appeasing the +rebellion in that country.</p> + +<p>“During the twelve months that I have been here, these two +Powers, the one remarkable for her wealth and the other for her +military force, have remained unaffected by my situation, perhaps +relying too much on the news sent by Hussein Pasha Khalifa who +surrendered of his own accord. Although I personally am too +insignificant to be taken into account, the Powers were bound +nevertheless to fulfil the engagement upon which my appointment was +based, so as to shield the honor of the Governments.</p> + +<p>“What I have gone through I cannot describe. The Almighty God +will help me.”</p> + +<p>I would observe that the fact of General Gordon speaking of +having been “twelve months” in the Soudan would lead to the +supposition that the telegram was written later than the clerk +stated. This is quite possible as Egyptians are not good at +remembering dates.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">C. M. <span class="sc">Watson</span>.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Sir Charles Wilson to Sir Henry +Gordon</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">Mountjoy Barracks, Phœnix Park, +Dublin,</p> + +<p class="right"><em>Sep.</em> 9 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Gordon</span>,</p> + +<p>There has never been any doubt in my mind as to the manner of +your brother’s death. He was killed before sunrise, apparently +before it was quite daylight, a short distance outside the Palace +gates, where he met a party of Arabs. He fell at the first +discharge, but whether killed, or severely wounded, we do not know; +his body when seen afterwards had several lance wounds, and his +head was cut off by a Dugaini Arab and exposed on a pole in +the<span class="pagenum" id="Page_524">[524]</span> open space +between the Mahdi’s two camps at Omdurman. I tried to keep these +details from the correspondents in the Sudan, knowing how painful +they would be to you and his family, but as you have asked for them +I give them now. The body was left on the ground some time, and +then appears to have been buried with others in the ditch south of +Khartum. One account was that the body was buried under a large +cairn of stones, where it fell, by people throwing stones at it as +they passed, a common Arab custom. The decapitation is also Arab +and what one might naturally expect; on the other hand the Arabs +never mutilate the dead as the Ethiopic tribes do. Our dead were +untouched except by lance thrusts, whilst those on the Sawakin side +were horribly mutilated. You may therefore be certain that no +insult was offered to your brother’s body.</p> + +<p>My view is that your brother was roused up, just before +daylight, by the news that the Arabs had entered the town, that he +hastily collected his cavasses (armed servants) and left the Palace +with the intention of reaching the stone church, where the +ammunition was stored, and then of blowing up the magazine or +trying to hold out till we arrived. He probably intended picking up +the Austrian Consul on his way, but unfortunately was met by a +party of Arabs just after he left the Palace gates. The Arabs +apparently did not know it was your brother when they fired; they +only saw the cavasses in their Egyptian uniform. Your brother, if +he had chosen, might have made an attempt to save his own life by +going on board the steamers which always had steam up; but you know +as well as I do he would never have done that. The steamers tried +to get down the river, but turned back when fire was opened upon +them from Omdurman; had a European been on board they might have +run the gauntlet. My account of your brother’s death is based on +two independent reports made not very long after the fall of +Khartum and before the wild stories which so rapidly grow out of +such an event, in semi-civilised countries, had time to obscure the +truth. In all essential particulars these reports have been +confirmed by later ones. The two reports I allude to were one by a +cavass of Ibrahim Bey Rushdi’s, whose master was killed with your +brother and who was present when they were killed. This man was of +Turkish origin, and bribed some Arabs to bring him across the +desert; from Khartum he went down to Cairo with the Mudir of +Dongola. The other was by a leading Sheikh of the Shagiyeh, whom we +had sent to Khartum with letters for your brother; this man was in +Khartum when it fell, and saw your brother’s body not long after he +had been killed; he came down to us by the Wady Bishara road. The +two men were unknown to each other, of different race,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_525">[525]</span> and came by different roads, +at an interval of a few days; there could not therefore have been +any collusion.</p> + +<p>Watson is collecting all he can about the last days at Khartum; +have you written to him?</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch7">Yours sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right">C. W. <span class="sc">Wilson</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Notes from an interview with a +Refugee who came from Khartoum on or about the 3rd November 1887 to +Suakin (from among Mrs. Moffitt’s papers)</span> +</p> + +<p>Rank, <em>Sergt. Major</em>.</p> + +<p>Nationality, <em>Turk</em>.</p> + +<p>Was formerly in the Garrison at Berber, but escaped at its fall +to Kartoum, where he was one of four Sergeants Orderlies to Gordon. +He was “on duty” on the 26th, and was with Gordon in the “look out” +on the top of the Palace. Gordon the evening before warned the +people that he had seen a great deal of extra excitement going on +in the rebel camp, and that unless a “good resistance was made that +night the town would fall.” The soldiers were in a starving state +and many left the lines in search of food, the civilians armed +themselves and went on to the lines. As the morning star rose the +rebels made a feint at the portion of the defence under Ferag Pasha +(with the black troops), but at the same time they directed their +full attack at the defence commanded by Hassan Bey Benassawie (with +the 5th Regt., fellaheen) and succeeded in getting into the town. +Gordon, when he heard the rebels in the town, said: “It is all +finished; to-day Gordon will be killed (“enhardeh Gordon +cassoora”), and went downstairs, followed by the four sergeants, +who took their rifles with them. He took a chair and sat down on +the right of the Palace door, the four sergeants standing on his +left; all at once a sheikh galloped up with some Baggara Arabs; the +sergeants were on the point of firing when Gordon, seizing one of +their rifles, said: “No need of rifles; to-day Gordon is to be +killed” (as before). The Sheikh told Gordon that he had been +ordered by the Mahdi to bring him alive. Gordon refused to go, +saying that he would die where he was, and adding that no harm was +to be done to the four sergeants who had not fired on the rebels. +The Sheikh repeated the order three times, and each time Gordon +gave the same answer. After a few words the Sheikh drew his sword +and rushing up to Gordon cut him in a slanting direction over the +left shoulder, Gordon looking him straight in the face and offering +no resistance of any kind. His head was cut off and taken to the +Mahdi at Omdurman, and his body was buried close to the +door<span class="pagenum" id="Page_526">[526]</span> of the Palace +and a tomb built over it. The four sergeants were not hurt, but +taken prisoners, and two have already managed to escape. The +sergeant, on being questioned about the report made by Colonel +Kitchener, states that food was so scarce that Gordon himself lived +on a handful of doura, which was made into a thick soup, the people +living chiefly on the fibre of the palm-tree made into cakes. All +the animals were killed, with the exception of a donkey, over which +there was a guard. Finally an officer stole it and sold its flesh +at any price he asked. A fish was caught and sold in a similar +manner.</p> + +<p>Ibrahim Bey Fowsi is now at Omdurman, Farag Ullah Bey is at +Galabat.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Sir Charles Watson to Sir Henry +Gordon</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Cairo, 2 <em>July</em> 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir Henry</span>,</p> + +<p>Very many thanks for sending me the “Journals,” which have +reached me this afternoon. I have only just had time to glance at +them, but write at once to catch the Italian mail. They seem most +interesting. What a pity it is that he did not keep them all from +the beginning of the siege instead of sending them down by Stewart, +but of course he thought it safer to do the latter.</p> + +<p>I was very glad to read your paper in the introduction about Sir +Charles Wilson, who seems to be unjustly blamed. Have you seen him +since he came to England? I was a little sorry to see the footnote +on page 121 about Abd-el-Kader Pasha, as it does not quite convey +the truth about his refusal to go to the Soudan. He agreed to go on +certain conditions, the most important of which was that the +abandonment of the Soudan was not to be announced, but in the +instructions which were drawn up for him the abandonment was a +leading feature. I made this note upon them at the time.</p> + +<p>“N.B. Abd-el-Kader did not agree to these instructions on the +ground that an immediate abandonment of Khartoum was inexpedient, +and that to go to the Soudan with such an intention would lead to +certain failure. The proposal to send him therefore fell through +(16 Jan. 1884).”</p> + +<p>Abd-el-Kader always remained of the same opinion that to +proclaim the abandonment of the Soudan was to make the removal of +the garrisons impossible. He is one of the best Pashas I have met +with, <em>one who has not got rich</em>.</p> + +<p>I shall write again when I have read the Journals.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch5">Yours very sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right">C. M. <span class="sc">Watson</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_527">[527]</span><span class="sc">Sir Charles Wilson’s +account of his Expedition to Omdurman sent to Sir H. Gordon</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Mountjoy Barracks, Dublin, 27 <em>July</em> +1885.</p> +</div> + +<p>1. The force under Sir H. Stewart was sent across the desert to +occupy Matammeh, open up communication with General Gordon’s +steamers, and through them with Khartum. It was hoped that the +presence of this force, which was not much larger than a battalion +at war strength, on the Nile at Matammeh would withdraw some of the +pressure on Khartum, but it was not sent to relieve that place.</p> + +<p>2. My mission was to communicate with General Gordon; to deliver +Lord Wolseley’s letters to him; to ascertain from him the exact +position of affairs at Khartum; to inform him that the forces +advancing for the relief of Khartum would be concentrated at +Matammeh and Shendy by the first week in March, and to have three +officers in Khartum to assist General Gordon in the defence until +relief came. I was then to return to Korti, bringing the English +soldiers down the river with me. There was never any question of my +attempting the relief of Khartum.</p> + +<p>3. No one at Gubat, no one on the steamers of General Gordon’s +flotilla had the slightest suspicion that a crisis would occur at +Khartum within a few days of our arrival at Matammeh. The first +time that the officers and men on the steamers expressed a doubt as +to the safety of Khartum was when we came under fire of the guns at +Halfiyeh. There was therefore no urgent necessity for an immediate +start without consideration for the position of the little force +which had been more than decimated on its march to the Nile.</p> + +<p>4. The steamers left Gubat at 8 a.m. on the 24th, and arrived +off Omdurman at 2 p.m. on the 28th; they were heavily laden with +grain, yet they made better time up the river as far as times can +be compared, than Lord C. Beresford in the “Safieh,” manned by +officers and men of the Second Division of the Naval Brigade who +had come across after the steamers left; this shows when once +started there was no delay. Had the steamers started at 3 p.m. On +the 21st, the day of their arrival, they would on the evening of +the 25th have been some distance below Halfiyeh, out of sight of +Khartum and unable to exert any influence over the events which +occurred at Khartum at dawn on the 26th. It is absurd to suppose +the Mahdi’s plans would have been altered by his knowing the two +steamers were coming up; he probably believed, as General Gordon +did, they could not pass the batteries.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_528">[528]</span>5. The steamers +were under fire from both banks, in action with the Mahdi’s army, +for four hours; it was impossible to land in the face of such a +strong force; they came out of action a little after 4, and about 5 +or soon after hauled into the bank to obtain information. We +ascertained then, <em>i.e.</em> on the evening of the 28th, that +Khartum had fallen through the treachery of Faraj Pasha at dawn on +the 26th, and that General Gordon had been killed. These were the +two capital facts which it was necessary the Government and Lord +Wolseley should know; all we have learned since is matter of +detail. There was frequent communication with natives on the way +down; they all told essentially the same story, and there was never +any doubt in my mind as to the truth of the main points.</p> + +<p>6. It may be interesting to know that General Gordon’s last +great sortie was on the 17th January, the day of Abu Klea; and that +it is almost certain he and his garrison had heard of the fight at +Abu Klea, and possibly Gubat before the end came.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">C. W. W.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Edward Hamilton to Sir Henry +Gordon</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>20th July</em> 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>I beg to return to you Lord Wolseley’s letter, of which I have +retained a copy.</p> + +<p>Mr. Gladstone is much obliged for your further note of to-day on +the subject of the position of affairs at Khartoum. He admits the +force of what you say; but he was under the impression that there +was a known route to the South and to the sea from Khartoum, and +that there must be persons, perhaps many persons, who are +acquainted with it from the course of trade or otherwise. He would +be glad to know whether he is right or wrong in this impression. +Faithfully yours,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<p class="center space-above15 space-below1"><span class= +"sc">Memorandum by Sir Henry Gordon, dated</span> <em>22nd +July</em> 1884. <span class="sc">Forwarded to Mr. Gladstone</span>, +<em>23rd July</em> 1884. <span class="sc">General Gordon’s present +position</span></p> + +<p>There is no proof that Khartoum is invested upon the South—on +the contrary there is presumptive evidence that it is not, since +the Rebels, if in position there, would find it difficult to keep +up their communications for supplies of Food, while their flanks +would be exposed on either side to constant attacks—by +means<span class="pagenum" id="Page_529">[529]</span> of steamers +from Khartoum. All communications that have come to hand, whether +true or not, point to the country to the South as being open, and +as of supplies coming in.</p> + +<p>There is no question but what if General Gordon wished to leave +with Colonel Stewart he could do so at any time, he could go to the +Bahr-el-Gazelle—or he could move to the Equator (see General +Gordon’s own statement that he could get away to the Congo, also +Sir Samuel Baker’s letter to the “Times” of 30th April, and to the +fact, according to Dr. Hill’s book, “Colonel Gordon in Central +Africa,” that he was travelling to and fro on a “low Nile,” in +March and April 1874).</p> + +<p>But it is equally certain that General Gordon would not desert +the people who have been faithful to him.</p> + +<p>It is not a question of the safety of the garrison, but it is +one of the protection of the traders at Khartoum.</p> + +<p>The former might be moved to Sennaar and thence transported +further to the South, the latter would not leave—to do so would be +worse than death (see enclosure in No. 3, Egypt, dated Khartoum, +8th April 1884, showing that General Gordon had traded with the +people whom he would not desert).</p> + +<p>The question would be the same if a force were at Khartoum.</p> + +<p>No doubt General Gordon at this time is doing all he can to +secure the safety of the inhabitants, and would not care how he +accomplished it.</p> + +<p>It is believed that he is conferring with the Mahdi, having this +object in view, although he has no faith in his (the Mahdi’s) +power. If General Gordon could secure the safety of the people of +Sennaar and Khartoum he would retire, since it may be assumed that +Kassala is safe.</p> + +<p>It seems probable that the Rebels to the North of Khartoum are +instigated by Zebehr, and that the money at Berber has been too +great a temptation to the Governor of that Station. It is doubtful +whether Berber was not quietly given over to the rebels, and that +it did not fall by assault.</p> + +<p>The Tribes to the North of Khartoum rose in rebellion for the +reasons stated in the “Times” of the 10th March, under date of +Khartoum 7th March; “this is not owing to disaffection, but to fear +caused by the pronounced policy of the abandonment of the Soudan, +which policy has been published by sending down the widows and +orphans and Cairo employees from Khartoum. We cannot blame them for +rising when no definite sign is shown of establishing a permanent +Government here. The Mahdi is a nonentity as to any advance on +Khartoum, but all-powerful through his emissaries when backed with +pronounced policy of abandonment without establishing a permanent +Government.”</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_530">[530]</span>On the other +hand while General Gordon may not, at this time, be in actual +personal danger more than that incidental to disaffection at +Khartoum, or from the daily contingencies which present themselves +in time of war, yet the time is approaching when some steps must be +taken to prove that he, as the agent of the British Government, is +not to be abandoned, and to this must be coupled the fact that his +ammunition is running short, and that he has not been heard of for +so long a period.</p> + +<p>It was hoped that the outbreaks among the tribes to the North of +Khartoum would long ago have been put down, and that the country +would have been quiet: such an expectation, however, has not been +realized, and when General Gordon’s ammunition fails he will be at +the mercy of the Rebels.</p> + +<p>In the absence of a Government that could secure the safety of +the inhabitants, matters could not improve, it is therefore +necessary, imperatively so, to reconsider General Gordon’s +application to have Zebehr sent up (see “Times,” 5th March, dated +Khartoum, 3rd March).</p> + +<p>“It is now admitted that Zebehr Pasha is the only man connected +with the Soudan, who is endowed with the ability and firmness +necessary to head any Government here.</p> + +<p>“It is out of the question that General Gordon should leave +Khartoum without first having formed a Government which would in +some measure stem the wave of fearful anarchy that must eventually +sweep over the Soudan. The arrival of Zebehr Pasha would draw off +to his side the bands of rebels which are now scattered over the +Soudan, and his great knowledge of the tribes fits him more than +any other man to take the place of the Egyptian Government. He +would, of course, come here under certain stringent conditions. +General Gordon had foreseen this ever since he left Cairo.” I +mentioned to Lord Granville in consequence of confidential +information from Cairo, to the effect “that if Zebehr went up to +Khartoum his first act would be to hang General Gordon,” that it +would be dangerous to send Zebehr up, and to this opinion I have +adhered up to the present time.</p> + +<p>As, however, the rebels remain in force to the North of +Khartoum, and as matters have not improved, and cannot improve +unless some future in the way of Government is made clear (bearing +also in mind that General Gordon will not desert the people at +Khartoum, unless he can leave them in safety), the time has now +arrived that Zebehr should be sent up. It would be in compliance +with General Gordon’s own request, and Zebehr might be offered a +sum of money provided he established an independent Government and +so enabled General Gordon to leave Khartoum. The payment might be +withheld until the object in<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_531">[531]</span> view, viz., General Gordon’s absence from +Khartoum, had been secured.</p> + +<p>It is believed that if Zebehr was sent up all danger to the +peoples at Khartoum, Sennaar and Kassala would cease, and the +country would be quieted.</p> + +<p>At the same time it is necessary that other precautions should +be taken the more especially as General Gordon’s ammunition is +daily decreased by expenditure. It would therefore seem desirable +that a force should be sent to Suakim in order to open the road +from that place to Berber (one of General Gordon’s suggestions), +but of course if Zebehr agrees to go, and is successful, then this +force would not be called into action, although no delay should +take place in its preparation.</p> + +<p>It would be out of place my making any remarks upon any +expedition advancing by the Nile, nevertheless I do not believe it +to be practicable.</p> + +<p>Any movement of Abyssinia upon Kassala and Sennaar would raise +the whole of the Soudan, and would do an amount of harm that cannot +be contemplated.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">H. W. <span class="sc">Gordon</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">The Rt. Hon. W. E. Gladstone, +M.P., to Sir Henry Gordon</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, 22 <em>Feb.</em> 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Sir Henry Gordon</span>,</p> + +<p>As long as a hope could in any way be entertained that your +distinguished and excellent brother had survived the betrayal of +Khartoum, I was unwilling to forgo the slender consolation it might +afford; and I have also been delayed in writing this note for two +or three days by an inquiry on a kindred subject. But I cannot +longer forbear from addressing to you my humble tribute to his +memory, insignificant as that tribute must be when rendered to one, +whose fame has not only become a national possession, but gone +forth throughout the world.</p> + +<p>Though I had not the privilege of his personal acquaintance, yet +his was a character of which I think many features could be plainly +read even from a distance. The judgement of mankind has pronounced +him a hero; and the application of that lofty name is specially +marked in his case by the fact that it applies not only to his +public acts, but to the man; to the spirit of self-sacrifice, such +as distinguished martyrs and apostles, to a simplicity of character +not less remarkable than his profound enthusiasm and his boundless +courage. I cannot but add, though it is perhaps presumptuous, my +admiration of his astonishing command, under +circumstances<span class="pagenum" id="Page_532">[532]</span> so +difficult of military resource, and of that inexhaustible strength +of will which formed the crown of his powers, it is difficult to +wish any of his virtues had been in any respect restrained; yet I +reflect with pain, now that catastrophe has come, how ill his +generous confidence was requited by some of those for whose +welfare, though they were of a foreign race, it was his desire to +live or die. I congratulate you on your close and intimate +association with General Gordon, and I trust that among us there +are and will be many who will strive to learn lessons in their +several places from this noble example of Christian heroism. +Believe me with much respect, faithfully yours,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">W. E. <span class="sc">Gladstone</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Sir Henry Gordon to Mr. +Gladstone</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right"><em>23rd February</em> (1885).</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Mr. Gladstone</span>,</p> + +<p>I am very much obliged for your very kind note of sympathy, and +for the very handsome manner in which you speak of General Gordon’s +character and services. It is not for me to dwell upon them, and +the subject is a very painful one, and therefore I hope you will +forgive the brevity of my reply.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch6">Yours faithfully,</p> + +<p class="right">H. W. <span class="sc">Gordon</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center">H.M. <span class="sc">Queen Victoria to Miss +Gordon</span></p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Osborne, <em>17th Feb.</em> 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Miss Gordon</span>,</p> + +<p><em>How</em> shall I write to you, or how shall I attempt to +express <em>what I feel</em>! To <em>think</em> of your dear, +noble, heroic Brother, who served his Country and his Queen so +truly, so heroically, with a self-sacrifice so edifying to the +World, not having been rescued. That the promises of support were +not fulfilled—which I so frequently and constantly pressed on those +who asked him to go—is to me <em>grief inexpressible</em>! indeed +it has made me ill! My heart bleeds for you his Sister, who have +gone through so many anxieties on his account, and who loved the +dear Brother as he deserved to be. You are all so good and +trustful, and have such strong faith, that you will be sustained +even now, when <em>real</em> absolute evidence of your dear +Brother’s death does not exist—but I fear there cannot be much +doubt of it. Some day I hope to see you again, to tell you all I +cannot express. My daughter Beatrice, who has felt quite as I do, +wishes me to express her deepest sympathy<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_533">[533]</span> with you. I hear so many expressions of +sorrow and sympathy from <em>abroad</em>: from my eldest daughter +the Crown Princess, and from my cousin the King of the Belgians—the +very warmest. Would you express to your other Sisters and your +elder Brother my true sympathy, and what I do so keenly feel, the +<em>stain</em> left upon England, for your dear Brother’s cruel, +though heroic, fate.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch27">Ever</p> + +<p class="right pad-rightch22">Dear Miss Gordon,</p> + +<p class="right">Yours sincerely and sympathizingly,</p> + +<p class="right">V. R. I.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Miss Augusta Gordon to Queen +Victoria</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Rockstone Place, Southampton.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Madam</span>,</p> + +<p>The letter which your Majesty has so graciously honoured me with +has deeply touched and gratified me. I am so thankful to know of +your sympathy for, and the endeavours you so very kindly made to +save my dear Brother, though <em>others dared</em> to prevent your +supporting him in his just demands. Never can I cease to be deeply +grateful to your Majesty for the great kindness you have shown +towards him. I think he received the gracious message you sent him +through me as in one of the Volumes of his Diaries he returns a +little letter in which I told him of your Majesty’s message. If +permitted I should like to bring over the Original Diaries when I +have the great honour to wait on your Majesty next month.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch6">I am your Majesty’s devoted subject +and servant,</p> + +<p class="right">M. <span class="sc">Augusta Gordon</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Miss Augusta Gordon to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Rockstone Place, Southampton, <em>11th +September</em> 1882.</p> +</div> + +<p>Will you kindly give me a copy (two if you can spare them) of +your letter on Egypt written to Mr. Gladstone and others. I am +sending on by the first mail your letters and the 19th Century to +my Brother at the Cape. Strange you were not listened to by those +in authority. I fancy there are many of your way of thinking and +there would be many more if they knew the rights and wrongs done to +Egypt.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">A. <span class="sc">Gordon</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_534">[534]</span><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to General C. G. +Gordon</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Delhi, <em>24th January</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear General</span>,</p> + +<p>I feel obliged to write to you about your mission to the Soudan. +I see it announced to-day by telegraph without explanation of its +object, but I cannot wait till more definite news arrives, and I +desire to warn you. It may be you are going there to make peace +between the Mahdi and our troops in Egypt, to acknowledge his +sovereignty in the Soudan, and arrange terms for the evacuation of +Khartoum. If so, I can only wish you God speed. It is a good work, +and you will accomplish it. But if, as I fear it may be, from the +tradition of some of those in power, the object of your mission is +to divide the tribes with a view to retaining any part of the +country for the Khedive, to raise men for him and scatter money, it +is bad work, and you will fail. It must be so. Neither your +courage, nor your honest purpose, nor the inspiration which has +hitherto guided you, will bring you success. I know enough to be +able to assure you that every honest Mohammedan in Egypt and North +Africa and Arabia sympathizes with the Mahdi’s cause, not +necessarily believing him to have a Divine mission, but as +representing ideas of liberty and justice and religious government +which they acknowledge to be divine. For this reason you will only +have the men of Belial on your side, and these will betray you. I +beg you be cautious. Do not trust to the old sympathy which united +Englishmen with the Arabs. I fear it is a thing of the past, and +that even your great name will not protect you with them. Also +consider what your death will mean: the certainty of a cry for +vengeance in England, and an excuse with those who ask no better +than a war of conquest. I wish I could be sure that all those who +are sending you on your mission do not foresee this end. Forgive me +if I am wrong in my fears; and believe me yours, very gratefully, +in memory of last year,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mrs. Surtees-Allnatt to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">134, St. Owens, Hereford, <em>Dec.</em> 27, +1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>Will you allow me, personally a stranger, to tell you how +interested I am in the result of your application to Mr. Gladstone +respecting your mediation with the Mahdi.</p> + +<p>You will the more readily understand my great interest, when I +mention that I was in London for some weeks last spring for the +purpose of devising some means for the rescue of +General<span class="pagenum" id="Page_535">[535]</span> Gordon, and +that I was about the first (I believe) to suggest the Volunteer +Expedition of which I see by the “Pall Mall Gazette” you had +heard.</p> + +<p>I saw Captain Brocklehurst, having called upon him though a +stranger, but knowing his friendship for General Gordon. My own +scheme was in the first place to have raised a “Khartoum Fund,” for +which I had many promises, and would have had no difficulty in +raising from £80,000 and upwards. My idea was to pay the safe +conduct for General Gordon and his garrison (in fact for all his +people at Khartoum) from Khartoum to Cairo, a certain sum to be +paid to the chief of each tribe, the amount to be in proportion to +the extent of territory over which the safe pass would be given. I +saw many members of the House of Commons and other influential +persons, but after discussion, though my plan was approved by many, +it was waived in favour of the Volunteer Expedition, to which I +promised to transfer the £100 I should have subscribed to the “safe +conduct” scheme.</p> + +<p>But the Government negatived decidedly the Volunteer movement, +and my plan had fallen through. It was with much regret that I +returned here, having after much anxiety and trouble effected +nothing of that on which my heart was set.</p> + +<p>If I had known you were in London I would have ventured to have +called on you. I have a strong personal regard for General Gordon, +and with many members of his family I am on terms of friendship. +Now, I am perplexed whether to wish you success in your application +to the Premier—if it would save General Gordon I would pray for +it—but if you should be frustrating plans for his safety I could +not. I write to you freely though a stranger, and I hope you will +forgive me, but the one great interest which I think we both have +in common, General Gordon, will plead my excuse.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch10">Believe me, dear Sir, yours +faithfully,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Elizabeth +Surtees-Allnatt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mrs. Allnatt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Crabbet Park, <em>Dec.</em> 29, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Madam</span>,</p> + +<p>I am sorry that I did not know of your plans for rescuing +General Gordon by peaceful means last year, as your support and +that of friends so liberal and sincere in their efforts would have +given great weight to my plea with Mr. Gladstone, and might perhaps +have turned the scale with him in favour of negociation. This +course would, I am convinced, have been an infinitely surer and +better one than that of war which our Government have chosen.</p> + +<p>My point of view in the matter is of course rather a +different<span class="pagenum" id="Page_536">[536]</span> one from +yours, for you look only to General Gordon’s safety, whereas I look +also, and indeed primarily, to the well-being of the Nile +populations; but I see no reason that our efforts should not even +now be made in common.</p> + +<p>From all the accounts I receive, Lord Wolseley’s expedition will +meet with determined opposition, and it is quite possible that it +may be several months yet on the road—in which case the time will +shortly come when necessity will compel the Government, if they +would not fail altogether in their object of saving Gordon’s life, +to have recourse to our ideas if not to our help. My principal fear +indeed is that, going to work through ignorance of the conditions +before them in a blundering way, their attempts to treat will be so +protracted that Khartoum will in the interval have fallen. I will +not, however, be a prophet of evil, only I would urge you not to +relax your efforts. Any independent appeal made just now to Mr. +Gladstone would, I believe, have at least this good effect, that it +would force on his attention the daily increasing gravity of +Gordon’s situation.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch12">Very faithfully yours,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mrs. Surtees-Allnatt to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">134, St. Owens, Hereford, <em>Febry.</em> 17, +1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>I thank you for your letter just received. I have given up (as +you see) all hope of the precious life having been saved. But how +cruel has been the martyrdom of his, during weeks and months, owing +to the Government, of which one cannot speak with aught but the +greatest contempt and indignation. Knowing the faith of the devoted +Christian soldier, I have the hope or rather the consolation of +thinking that as he was deserted by man so his God was nearer to +him day by day.</p> + +<p>I go tomorrow (Wednesday) till Saturday to Mr. Egmont Hake, the +Biographer of “Chinese Gordon.” I should like very much to talk +over one or two matters with you now, respecting the recovery of +his bible and journal, etc., and also of the proposed additional +expedition. Is it not madness to send one of the Khedive’s sons as +Governor General of the Soudan? I thought the Egyptians were hated +by the poor Soudanese.</p> + +<p>Unhappy land! What will be the outcome of all this? God, who +created the world out of chaos, can bring order out of the Egyptian +confusion.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">Believe me, My dear Sir, Yrs. +sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Elizabeth +Surtees-Allnatt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_537">[537]</span><span class="sc">Mrs. Surtees-Allnatt to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">38, Montpellier Terrace, Cheltenham, <em>Feb.</em> +21, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>I am staying here till Wednesday, when I shall <span class= +"sc2">D.V.</span> return to Hereford, where I shall anxiously await +the result of your kind effort to procure for me the bible of dear +General Gordon.</p> + +<p>In the train to-day I read in the papers, with dismay, the reply +of the Government to the questions respecting the important and +precious records of Khartoum kept by its devoted Defender. They +decline to say what course they will take regarding them. I have +just written to Sir Henry Gordon most earnestly beseeching him, out +of regard to his brother’s memory, to apply for the possession of +the journal, 6 volumes, on their arrival. One dreads such important +and deeply interesting records getting into the hands of men so +unscrupulous as those comprising the present Government. The papers +would probably be cruelly mutilated before leaving their hands, if +there were aught in them that would condemn those who sacrificed +their devoted Envoy to paltry party devices.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch10">I am my dear Sir, Yrs. +sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Elizabeth +Surtees-Allnatt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<p class="center space-above15 space-below1"><span class= +"sc">Extract from Edith, Lady Lytton’s Diary</span> +</p> + +<p><em>June</em> 7, Simla, 1880.—In the evening, while we were at +dinner under the Shemiana on the lawn, Lord William [Beresford] +arrived, having left Lord Ripon at Umballa and come on very quickly +to reach us for our last evening. He says the heat has been +tremendous and worse than he has ever felt it, and he and Major +White had to put ice on their heads one night, expecting every +minute to succumb. But Lord Ripon and party have not complained or +been ill. Lord William told us about Colonel Gordon being so odd; +he says the world is not big enough for him, and that there is no +king or country big enough. He hit Lord William on the shoulder, +saying, “Yes, that is flesh, that is what I hate, and what makes me +wish to die.” He resigned the Private Secretaryship, to the +Viceroy’s great inconvenience, because he was asked to answer an +address at Bombay saying that Lord Ripon had read it with interest +and would write again at some time, and he said: “You know +perfectly that Lord Ripon has never read it, and will not write, +and I can’t say those sort of things, so I shall resign, and you +take in my resignation.” Colonel Gordon received a telegram from +China asking him to go and fight the Russians<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_538">[538]</span> there, so he has gone off to do so, and +his last word to Lord William was, “Everyone will say I am mad, but +you say I am not.”</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Colonel Louis A. Gordon to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Carpenters, Horsham, Sussex, <em>Sept.</em> 4, +1911.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Mr. Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I am glad to see that you, in your new book “Gordon at +Khartoum,” are undertaking the vindication of my uncle’s memory +against an attack on it, which Lord Cromer thought fit to make in +his “Modern Egypt” so many years after the death of General Gordon +and my father Sir Henry Gordon. I know that nothing that Lord +Cromer could write would in the least affect General Gordon’s +memory; but the remarks he makes leave a nasty taste in the mouth +and it is very desirable that they should be responded to in +detail.</p> + +<p>In “Modern Egypt,” page 43, Vol. I, I observe a note which +affects my father, Sir Henry Gordon; Lord Cromer says: “At the +instance however, of General Gordon’s friends and family, a good +deal of violent and very foolish abuse of Lord Granville—and if I +remember rightly, of others—was omitted. It is in my opinion to be +regretted that this was done. The publication of the Journal, as it +was originally written, would have enabled the public to judge more +accurately of the value of General Gordon’s criticisms, than was +possible when only an expurgated edition was issued.” This contains +an accusation of tampering with the Journals which the facts do not +warrant.</p> + +<p>As far as Sir Henry Gordon is concerned, expurgation of the kind +referred to by Lord Cromer was certainly not authorised. In his +“Description of the Journals,” page lxv, my father says: “I have +arranged . . . for their issue in a very nearly entire state, only +some 6 or 7 pages being omitted which contain, in my opinion, no +matter of public interest; while with regard to names those who are +well acquainted with the affairs of Egypt can fill in the blanks +without difficulty.” That no fraud has been exercised on the public +in the matter, and that the public has not been deprived of the +opportunity of reading the Journals in full, is sufficiently plain +by the fact that the Journals were deposited by my family in the +British Museum plain for all folk to see; so that anyone, caring to +do so, can satisfy himself on the subject.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">Yrs. sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right">L. A. <span class="sc">Gordon</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_539">[539]</span><a id= +"appb"></a>APPENDIX B</h2> + +<p class="sch2">MR. BLUNT’S ORIENTAL CORRESPONDENCE</p> + +<h3>I. <span class="sc">As to his proposed Mediation with the +Mahdi</span></h3> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Sheykh Mohammed +Abdu at Paris</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">London, <em>April</em> 7, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut2">To my noble and dear friend, the learned Sheykh +Mohammed Abdu, the martyr of liberty, may God continue to enlighten +him.</p> + +<p>Your letter, which Her Ladyship has now translated to me in +full, has given me much pleasure except in what you say of your not +being able yet to come to England; but I send you by this post the +money needful for your journey and trust that you will acknowledge +to me its safe arrival. I wrote four days ago to M. Sanua telling +him something of the state of opinion here, and since that time I +have written a letter which will be published in the ‘Times’ of +to-morrow or Wednesday in which I have proposed a solution of the +present difficulties and misfortunes in Egypt. I trust that it may +meet with your approval, for in it I propose that the Egyptian +question shall be referred to an European Congress, that the +English army shall retire from the country and that Egypt shall be +placed under the joint protection of the Powers, and so govern +herself according to her own will.</p> + +<p>I propose also that peace shall be made with the Mahdi, and +General Gordon be recalled from Khartoum—nor have I forgotten to +recommend that the decrees of exile against the patriots of Egypt +shall be reversed. With regard to Egypt and Syria and the Arabian +Caliphate you know well my views, for they are published in the +book which I wrote three years ago founded on your learned +instructions and your views conveyed to me through our dear friend +(peace be with him) Mohammed Khalil. But with regard to the +Mohammedans of India these are my views, and I beg that you will +communicate them to the noble prince the Seyyid Jemal-ed-Din (to +whom also I send my best compliments) that he may know them himself +and communicate them to the Nawab Rasul Yar Khan and the Ulema of +Hyderabad, though I have already told them of my thoughts, having +spoken freely to all the Mohammedans of India whom I met. My +thoughts therefore about India are these. According to the +principles which I<span class="pagenum" id="Page_540">[540]</span> +hold in political affairs I desire to see liberty and self +government established everywhere, and in India no less than in +other countries of the world now held in subjection, and I am not +prejudiced by the fact that I was born an Englishman into wishing +for other advantage there than to the Indians, nor should I +hesitate to approve of any wise plan which should hasten their +freedom. At the same time my journey in India has convinced me that +the people of that country are not yet sufficiently united to form +an independent nation, unprotected by some external Power. If all +Indians were of one creed and one language and one race, as was the +case in Egypt, I would say to them as I said to you, “Bismillah,” +in the name of God go forward and fear nothing. But it is not so. I +see that though they might free themselves from the English +domination, which is hateful to them, they are not yet prepared to +set anything of profit to them in its place. I see that they must +be educated and prepared for self government. Otherwise their +effort would not prosper. For this reason I have said to them, and +I say it again, take patience for a few years and work out your +political education under a government which allows you this +privilege of education, and later the moment will come when you +shall be able to unite and form a Nation. To the Mohammedans I say +this especially, for they are but as one to five of the population +of India, and at the present moment they are also inferior to the +Hindus and Parsis in education, so that it is possible their +condition would be worse under native than under English rule. By +advising them to found an University I desired first to give them a +centre of unity which should add to their strength, for strength is +in union,—and secondly to prepare them to take their full part in +the regeneration of their country. At present, by standing aloof +from public affairs and by remaining in ignorance of English, which +is the official language, they are putting themselves at a +disadvantage with the other races and religions of India. I trust +therefore that the learned Seyyid, when he writes to Hyderabad will +encourage them to proceed in this good work, and not to spare their +efforts in the direction I have pointed out.</p> + +<p>With regard to your newspaper I shall be happy to do what I can +to help you. But I advise you strongly to be moderate in your +language about the English Government—not that anything you can say +about its action in Egypt can surpass my own anger and +impatience,—but because I see in the friendship of England still +the best hope for Islam. Believe me, though England has acted +through all this matter as an enemy of religion, there are still +more Englishmen who sympathise with our hopes for the nations of +the East than you will find amongst all the rest of the Europeans. +You cannot trust the French or the Russians or the<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_541">[541]</span> Austrians or the Italians to +act with you sincerely as friends—and the English being stronger at +sea than all others, must always be counted with, and if possible +secured as friendly. This may yet come about, and I should be sorry +to see an irreconcilable breach made between the party of reform in +Islam and the English people. Think this matter fairly over. For +centuries England was the friend of Islam, and I find very many +Englishmen now who regret and condemn the change of policy.</p> + +<p>You see I have spoken openly all that is in my heart.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch5">Your friend in good and bad +fortune,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Sheykh Mohammed Abdu to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Translation from the Arabic.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Paris, <em>April</em> 11, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p>To H. E. my dear friend, friend of the Moslems, helper of the +Arabs and defender of the Egyptian nation, etc.</p> + +<p>After salutation to you and to the well-instructed Lady Anne +Blunt—yesterday your letter reached us, and reading it we found it +full of wisdom and useful counsels to the Moslems, and it confirmed +our trust in you that you are their friend.</p> + +<p>The Seyyid Jemal-ed-Din presents you his salutation and will +certainly write to the people of India in Hyderabad and elsewhere, +and will advise them to be quiet, and will tranquillize their minds +as you suggested; and he will expound to them the idea you have so +clearly set forth in your letter, and will put the details before +them in the best and most lucid manner.</p> + +<p>Next, we rejoiced at the admonition you were kind enough to give +us, and at your promise to help our newspaper (the Indissoluble +Link), and this was our hope in you. And indeed God the Most High +created you to do good, and to assist the cause of right, and to +defend the oppressed. And the true character of our newspaper is +only this, and to serve those views for which you are labouring, +namely, the preservation of the independence of the Eastern +peoples, and the admonishing of the English Government that it may +abandon its action troubling the minds of Moslems and make fast +their friendship, and that so it shall have them with it on its +side. And indeed we do not love those other Powers referred to in +your letter, nor go with the policy of any one of them.</p> + +<p>And so may peace be with you and the mercy of God. Your sincere +friend,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Mohammed Abdu</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_542">[542]</span><span class="sc">Seyyid Jemal-ed-Din to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Privée.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Paris le 21 <em>Avril</em>, 84.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Mon cher Monsieur</span>,</p> + +<p>J’ai eu l’honneur de recevoir votre aimable lettre dont je vous +remercie et à laquelle je m’empresse de répondre.</p> + +<p>Quoique je n’ai nullement appris pendant les dix années que j’ai +passées en Egypte que M. Gordon fût, à l’époque où il était +Gouverneur du Soudan, ami de la liberté et défenseur de l’Islam, je +n’hesite pas cependant, étant donnée la pleine confiance que j’ai +en votre parole, à plaindre son malheureux sort et à regretter +qu’il soit tombé dans une situation qui devient de plus en plus +critique.</p> + +<p>Je ne vous cache pas, cher Monsieur, qu’il m’aurait été facile, +vu la confiance que le Mahdi parait vouloir avoir en moi ainsi que +celle de ses principaux partisans dont un grand nombre sont de mes +élèves Soudanais, de prévenir ce désastre qui ménace Gordon Pacha +si les dernières batailles entre Graham et Osman Digna ne s’étaient +pas engagées; mais après ces batailles sanglantes qui ont coûté +tant de sang Arabe, je crois que le Mahdi et ses partisans sont +réduits à voir que le seul moyen de ratrapper le terrain perdu et +de consolider leur prestige serait de s’emparer de Khartoum et +d’arrêter M. Gordon sinon de lui arracher la vie.</p> + +<p>Cependant, si vous voulez, cher Monsieur, m’écrire avec plus de +détails et <em>en français</em> sur les bases de la paix que vous +voudriez conclure et avec qui désireriez vous qu’elle soit faite +pour qu’elle soit acceptable et en règle, je ne manquerais pas +alors de vous fixer sur tout ce que je pourrais faire dans cette +circonstance et sur les moyens efficaces dont on pourrait se servir +pour sauver la vie à ce malheureux Gordon.</p> + +<p>En attendant le plaisir de vous lire, je me mets à votre entière +disposition et vous prie d’agréer mes salutations distinguées.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Jemal-ed-Din Huseyni +Afghani</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Seyyid Jemal-ed-Din +Afghani</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, James Street, le 24 <em>Avril</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Noble et cher ami</span>,</p> + +<p>La bonne réponse que vous avez bien voulu me faire à mes +questions sur le sort de Gordon me touche profondément. Je sais +combien il a dû vous coûter de prendre ainsi part à un projet qui +aurait pour bût de prêter aide à un homme qui malgré ses principes +avoués a fait tant de tort à la cause que nous aimons; mais je vois +dans cette affaire une occasion puissante pour obtenir du +Gouvernement Anglais l’abandon de sa politique actuelle +en<span class="pagenum" id="Page_543">[543]</span> Egypte. Je viens +d’adresser formellement à M. Gladstone une lettre où je lui fais +savoir qu’il serait encore possible pour lui non seulement de +sauver la vie à Gordon mais d’amener la pacification de toute la +vallée du Nil. Hier encore on était résolu d’envoyer une nouvelle +expédition Anglo-Egyptienne au Soudan, mais il parait que déjà ma +lettre aurait produit quelque effet et qu’on soit maintenant de +nouveau à la paix. Je compte donc sous peu de jours recevoir +quelque communication du Gouvernement qui ménerait à un tentatif de +négociations et je voudrais vous prévenir que je pourrais à tout +instant vous prier de vouloir bien venir à Londres où bien +d’envoyer le Sheykh Mohammed Abdu me parler.</p> + +<p>Je vous prie de regarder d’un bon œil mes idées pacifiques. +Comme je vous ai déjà dit, je vois dans l’Angleterre la seule +puissance qui pourrait redevenir un ami sincère de l’Islam; et je +vois dans la nécessité où est dans ce moment notre Gouvernement un +puissant lévier pour amener l’abandon de sa position actuelle +d’hostilité. Quant aux conditions de paix je ne suis pas encore en +position de vous les formuler. Mais selon moi elles devraient +s’étendre jusqu’à la cession du Soudan entier au Mahdi. Je vous +envoie copie d’une lettre qui j’ai eu de Gordon il y a près de deux +ans qui vous sera preuve de son bon caractère.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch12">Bien votre dévoué,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Seyyid +Jemal-ed-Din</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, James Street, le 25 <em>Avril</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Noble et cher ami</span>,</p> + +<p>Depuis ma lettre d’hier je l’ai d’une source certaine que notre +Gouvernement s’est décidé absolument contre l’expédition, pour le +moment, de toute force militaire Anglaise ou Egyptienne à Berber. +Or il est presque sûr qu’on se prépare à une négociation, et déjà +on me fait entendre que je recevrai sous peu une réponse définitive +à ma lettre. Que pensez vous, pourrai je aller en personne à Obeyd +en qualité d’Envoyé Britannique traiter avec le Mahdi en lui +reconnaisant la souverainté du Soudan? Et croyez vous qu’à ces +conditions les tribus qui assiègent Khartoum permettraient à Gordon +et aux Chrétiens de la ville de retourner sous sauf-conduite en +Egypte? Ou bien, si je ne pourrai pas aller en personne, +croyez-vous qu’il se trouverait quelque autre envoyé capable de +mener la négociation à bonne fin? Je vous prie de vouloir bien me +répondre à ces questions.</p> + +<p>En même temps je compte persuader le Gouvernement de restaurer +le parti National en Egypte. Mais dîtes moi franchement<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_544">[544]</span> votre idée. Qui devrons nous +proposer en place de Tewfik? Serait ce Arabi ou un autre? Les +Circassiens, si je ne me trompe, voudraient Ismaïl. Les autres +voudraient encore peut-être Halim. Mais l’opinion change si vite +que je n’ose dire absolument à qui on donnerait les votes si la +chose était remise à l’election. Surtout qui pourrait agir en +Egypte de concert avec le Mahdi?</p> + +<p>Inshallah! nous mènerons l’affaire cette fois ci à bonne +fin.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch14">Votre bien dévoué,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Arabi Pasha</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Sent in Arabic.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, James Street, <em>April 26th</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut2">To my noble and dear friend Arabi Pasha, may God +strengthen his patience.</p> + +<p>After saying that it has given us extreme pleasure to have news +of you and the rest of the noble Egyptian exiles—this is to inform +you that the hopes of your return to Egypt are, as I think, greater +now than at any previous time since you first went away in Exile. +The reason of this is (after the will of Providence that truth +should prevail) that the English Government has fallen into great +trouble in Egypt, first on account of the finance and secondly with +regard to the Mahdi. They are therefore entirely anxious to leave +Egypt, and they see that it is necessary in order to do this that a +stable Government should be set up at Cairo, and a prince +established who should be able to live in friendship with the +Mahdi.</p> + +<p>Therefore it is probable that they will abandon Tewfik inasmuch +as he is incapable of governing and will entrust the government to +other hands before they withdraw their troops. And in these last +days the danger to General Gordon at Khartoum obliges them to come +to terms quickly, and I have proposed (with the permission of God) +to go as Envoy to the Mahdi in order to make peace and to save the +life of General Gordon; and, if they should accept my offer, I do +not fear but that they will also accept my plan for the restoration +of good government in Egypt. Now therefore tell me clearly, on what +terms could you and your companions return to Egypt? I know that +you could serve with Halim Pasha. But tell me, is it impossible +that you could serve with Ismaïl? I have several times received +messages from Ismaïl, and his friends tell me that he promises to +act with you if he is restored. But do you think it would be +possible to trust him? I should propose that in any case the +command of the army should be in your hands. Or is there any other +prince among the Princes of Islam whom you would serve and who +could live at peace with the Mahdi; I ask<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_545">[545]</span> you these things because the aspect of +politics continually changes, and what is true to-day is not true +to-morrow, and what was rejected yesterday may once again be +accepted.</p> + +<p>Also a conference is assembling at which it will be necessary +that your opinion should be heard. Therefore write to me your full +mind and the mind of your companions, and, if you should resolve +that you could return to Egypt as Minister to Ismaïl, telegraph to +me then one word “content,” and I shall understand. If you consider +that it will be impossible for you to serve under Ismaïl, telegraph +the word “refused.”</p> + +<p>For the rest all things are going well. There are many +Englishmen now who recognize your services to Egypt and I am +hopeful of your return there.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch20">Your friend,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p class="space-above15">You must not suppose from my writing in +this sense that I want you to make friends with Ismaïl. What I want +is that you should tell me your real opinion as to whether it will +be possible for you to work with him.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Seyyid Jemal-ed-Din to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Privée.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Paris, <em>April</em> 28, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Mon cher Monsieur</span>,</p> + +<p>J’ai eu l’honneur de recevoir votre lettre que j’ai lue avec +beaucoup d’attention et à laquelle je m’empresse de répondre.</p> + +<p>Vous ne devez pas ignorer l’importance que les Mohamétans +attachent à la mission divine avec laquelle le Mahdi a paru et +qu’ils comprennent par ce mot, Mahdi: le sauveur de l’Islam des +mains de ceux qui ne sont pas de leur religion. Or je ne vois pas +qu’on puisse conclure un traité de paix avec le Mahdi et par +consequent arrêter sa marche tant que celui-ci voit les Anglais en +Egypte. Mais si les bases de la paix stipulent que l’Egypte sera +aux Egyptiens et que Gordon Pacha sera sauvé avec tous les +Chrétiens qui sont avec lui et que, enfin, les troupes Anglaises +seront retirées de l’Egypte, je vois qu’il serait possible sinon +facile de mener cette affaire à bonne fin et d’arrêter l’invasion +du Mahdi jusqu’à un certain point et jusqu’à un certain temps. Dans +ce cas il faudrait envoyer une commission de paix composée en +grande partie de Mussulmans et de quelques Anglais. Quand aux +Mussulmans ils auraient pour instruction de dire qu’ils viennent de +la part de la Nation Egyptienne Mussulmane car si ils seraient +envoyés de la part du Gouvernement Egyptien, je ne crois pas qu’ils +réussissent dans leur mission étant donné l’aversion dont le +Mahdi<span class="pagenum" id="Page_546">[546]</span> est animé à +son égard, et de la part du Gouvernement Anglais, ils ne seront pas +écoutés. Nous en avons acquis une preuve par le Cheick El Morghani. +Quant aux quelques Anglais qui feront partie de la mission, il est +bien entendu qu’ils iront de la part de leur Gouvernement; quoique, +par le fait, tous, Mussulmans et Chrétiens seront des missionaires +Anglais.</p> + +<p>Dans le cas qu’on décide à envoyer cette commission, et dans les +conditions que je me suis permis de vous exposer, je crois que +vous, cher Monsieur, vous devez être le premier nommé parmi les +missionaires, car les Mussulmans ne peuvent pas trouver beaucoup de +défenseurs comme vous. Pour les Mussulmans qu’il faudrait envoyer, +je les désignerai et vous en ferai connaître les noms quand le +moment serait venu et qu’on se serait décidé d’une façon +definitive.</p> + +<p>Vous me demandez en qui faut-il remplacer Tewfik? Je réponds que +quand le moment serait venu il ne serait difficile ni à vous ni à +moi ni à qui que ce soit de le savoir. Il faudrait se prononcer +pour celui que la <em>nation Egyptienne</em> veut et pas pour un +autre.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch18">Votre bien dévoué,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Jemal-ed-Din Huseyni +Afghani</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Seyyid +Jemal-ed-Din</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, James Street, le 2 <em>Mai</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Noble et cher ami</span>,</p> + +<p>Je vous remercie bien de vos instructions sur la manière de +négocier qui sont absolument d’accord avec mes idées personnelles. +Pour le moment le Gouvernement se retire du tentatif proposé, mais +je suis toujours en rélation indirecte avec eux, et je pense bien +qu’ils se trouveront encore dans la nécessité de recourir à nos +bons offices. Seulement l’hésitation pourra bien coûter la vie à +Gordon. Pour le moment le Gouvernement est toujours dans +l’intention d’abandonner Khartoum, Berber et Dongola, mais je +prévois que dans le cas que Gordon soit encore debout à Khartoum à +l’époque du cru du Nil le public anglais pourra exiger une +opération militaire.</p> + +<p>Quant au général il se pourra que son intention serait de se +retirer vers le Congo, quand il trouvera qu’il ne pourra plus se +tenir à Khartoum, et je crois que le Mahdi serait bien avisé de lui +laisser le passage libre. L’idée de Gordon au Congo parait avoir +toujours été d’y fonder un Etat indigène qui pourrait faire face à +l’envahissement de l’Europe, et en tant il mériterait votre +sympathie. Faites un pont d’or pour l’ennemi qui s’en fuit. Je suis +cependant pleinement<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_547">[547]</span> de votre avis qu’il soit nécessaire au +Mahdi de s’emparer sans delai de Khartoum. Je vous prie de me +croire bien votre ami.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Seyyid Jemal-ed-Din to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Paris, le 7 <em>Mai</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Mon cher Monsieur</span>,</p> + +<p>Je viens d’arriver de l’Italie. J’ai été à l’exposition de Turin +et ce n’est que ce matin que l’on m’a remis vos deux lettres que +j’ai lues avec beaucoup d’attention.</p> + +<p>Votre dernière lettre m’a d’autant plus appris que vous ne vous +intéresserez plus au sort de Gordon qu’il m’a édifié encore une +fois sur la loyauté et la grandeur d’âme qui vous caractérisent. +Tout en vous remerciant d’avoir bien voulu m’envoyer le livre bleu +contenant certaines correspondances relatives au Général Gordon, +des quelles vous avez pu constater qu’il n’était nullement ami de +la liberté ni défenseur de l’Islam, j’ai la ferme conviction que +votre nom sera gravé dans le cœur de chaque musulman en particulier +et de chaque Arabe et Oriental en général à cause de l’intérêt +immense que vous prenez pour eux et dont il ne sauraient vous être +trop reconnaissant. J’espère, cher Monsieur, que vous continuerez à +suivre cette voie digne d’un caractère aussi loyal que le vôtre et +que le bon Dieu vous aidera à récolter les fruits du travail dur +que vous faites.</p> + +<p>Veuillez, je vous prie, me faire rappeler au bon souvenir de +Madame Blunt tout en lui présentant mes respectueux hommages et +soyez persuadé que je me mets à votre entière disposition pour tout +ce que je pourrais faire pour vous.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch22">Votre bien dévoué,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Jemal-ed-Din Husayni +Afghani</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Arabi Pasha to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Sent in English.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Colombo, <em>2nd June</em> 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut2">To my lord Mr. Wilfrid Blunt, may God preserve +him.</p> + +<p>It is with the greatest pleasure that I acknowledge the receipt +of your letter of the 26th April 1884. I must strongly insist on +the fact that Ismaïl Pasha is a treacherous person who is notorious +for his untrustworthiness, being the causer of the destruction of +Egypt. The national Debt of our country is the work of his hands. +There is no one of the prince’s family who possesses the requisite +qualifications for the throne but Halim Pasha. He is,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_548">[548]</span> besides, the direct descendant +of the first Khedive, being the son of Mohammed Ali. Tewfik (the +present Khedive) and the others are members of a third branch, so +that Halim Pasha, who is directly the ancestral representative, is +the real owner of the throne. To add to his right he has the voice +of all the Egyptians in Egypt to hail him, and he has for a long +time undergone trials of a very grave nature, having been subjected +to tyranny. Also he would be able to make a treaty between the +Mahdi and the Government of Egypt, inasmuch as those whom the Mahdi +trusts are able to effect this for him.</p> + +<p>If you are resolved to go to the Mahdi, I must most earnestly +entreat you to secure beforehand some letters stamped with my seal, +in order that they may serve as the proof that you are a faithful +friend of the Moslem world, and that you have been instrumental in +saving our lives. May God preserve you. Your most faithful +friend,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Ahmed Arabi</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Arabi Pasha to Lady Anne +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Translated from the Arabic.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Colombo, <em>March</em> 2, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut2">To the noble and exalted lady, Lady Anne Blunt; +may God protect her. Amen.</p> + +<p>After presenting my best salutations to your distinguished self +and your illustrious husband, and in response to your two letters +with inclosures relating what Mr. Blunt had written in the “Times” +on Egypt and England and the Sultan, with the remarks made thereon, +permit me to assure you that all that Mr. Blunt has stated in the +“Times,” and declared publicly in many utterances, and all that he +described in his poem (kasid) “The Wind and Whirlwind,” of the +disasters and calamities that must ensue, all these are true, and +we see them happening now, as it was necessary they should happen, +and truly the Most High God inspired him with truth to speak these +things, and with a just understanding. For the time has come now +when God shall choose his servants, and shall deliver the weak and +oppressed and abase the mighty and oppress the oppressor, and shall +manifest His power and His strength to the unjust. And thus in +times past He confounded men’s reasoning by His wonderful +judgements on the nations that are gone. Thus He destroyed Babylon +the adulterous, the violent city, and thus the empires of Persia +and of Rome; and I grieve with a great grief over the decline of +the star of England caused by her misdeeds in Egypt and in the +Soudan. But God has heard the cry of the oppressed and the voice of +the blood which has been shed, and<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_549">[549]</span> the terrible cry of the widow and of the +young children, and surely He has taken His vengeance on the +covetous. Yet, believe me, the people of Egypt used to believe good +of the English nation. It was they of all others that they trusted, +as the foremost among nations, and as the chief hope of those who +sought to obtain their freedom; and they grieve now seeing their +belief a deception, and their trust a delusion.</p> + +<p>And what has England gained by her invasion of Egypt, and what +in the Soudan? Rather let us say, what has she lost? For God knows +she has gained nothing. She has lost her good name, the friendship +of all Moslems, and of our Lord the Sultan. She has lost, too, +Gordon Pasha, through acting on false counsels, and Hicks and +Earle, and how many other officers; and she has lost the respect of +all hearts by this war against free men in the Soudan. When will +she cease to rush forward on her course, to send armies of revenge +on men who are themselves avenging their Egyptian brothers; on men +defending their country, and who delight to drink the cup of death +rather than that they should see an enemy left within its borders. +I tell you, <em>fifteen</em> millions of such as these occupy at +this moment the Soudan country and Darfur, and all of them are +partisans of the Mahdi, having made a convention with him unto +death, and in accordance with the precepts of our noble Koran. Thus +the Mahdi increases in strength with the English aggression, and +this is God’s law with his creatures, with all who have been given +intelligence to see and reflect and understand.</p> + +<p>“A decree has come forth from God. There is no escape from the +judgement of God. God shall exalt whom He will, and abase whom He +will. The oppressor shall repent when repentance shall not avail +him. And God is not unmindful of the deeds of the unjust.” +(Quotations.)</p> + +<p>My son Mohammed Bey and the family send you a thousand thousand +greetings. From your friend and servant,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Ahmed Arabi</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Seyyid Jemal-ed-Din to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Translated from the Arabic.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Paris, <em>May</em> 12, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p>After salutations, etc. I say; I am not alone in gratitude for +your distinguished efforts which have forced the Government to +evacuate the Soudan. No, be certain that all Moslems, especially +the Arabs, will be grateful for this your action to the end of time +and they will write your name on tablets inlaid with precious +stones and titles of glory and honour for your zeal and +courage.</p> + +<p>But there is left one thing still to be done and that is that +you<span class="pagenum" id="Page_550">[550]</span> should say to +the Government, “How can you leave this land thus without a treaty +with the Mahdi and whose will be the duty of repelling the Mahdi’s +attacks? how also can the Government leave the roads of commerce +blocked? or does it desire the destruction of trade? Is it not +incumbent on the Government when it has determined to evacuate the +Soudan to send a man of trust, a Moslem, to the Mahdi that he may +discuss with him as to a peace and secure Egypt from his attacks +and to close the gates of conflict and reopen those of Commerce.” I +think that if this question were presented to parliament all +opinions would agree with it.</p> + +<p>I see too that this would be easy, even apart from your own +action and that when the cost has been decided on you will be only +needed to complete it. But without a treaty of peace with the Mahdi +the situation cannot be brought to a final conclusion. This is what +I have thought it necessary to say to you.</p> + +<p>With salutations to you and your consort,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch22">Your friend,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Jemal-ed-Din Huseyni +Afghani</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Arabi Pasha to Lady Anne +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Translated from the Arabic.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Colombo, <em>August</em> 14, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut2">To my lady, dear Lady Anne Blunt. May God +preserve her.</p> + +<p>After best salutations to yourself and Mr. Blunt I was happy to +receive your letter dated July 17th, and thanked God that you are +in good health, of which I hope for the continuance. I sent you a +telegram the same day as to my willingness to serve the country +even with Tewfik and Sherif, and I now write this in +confirmation.</p> + +<p>I can assure you that I am prepared to serve my country, to work +hard at reforms in it, and to labour for its advancement to the +highest pitch of honour and prosperity.</p> + +<p>Therefore I should not mind whether I served with Tewfik or +another, my one only object being the establishing of just law for +all men alike, giving to all security for their persons and for +their civil and religious rights, and putting an end to wrong and +injustice between class and class of (Egyptian) subjects, always +bearing in mind the claims on me of the English people +(<em>nation</em>) to whom I shall be grateful as long as I +live.</p> + +<p>I have, too, a firm trust that the English Government would aid +me in carrying out reforms, and that, after establishing a strong, +just, and equitable Government, it will leave Egypt to the +Egyptians, thus fulfilling its promise and completing what it has +commenced.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_551">[551]</span>As to Sherif, he +is well disposed and anxious for the good of the country, but Nubar +is not really interested in the welfare of Egypt, and the Egyptians +are weary at his holding high office in the country.</p> + +<p>Now, therefore, since you and your friends, and my friends, are +of opinion that it would be fitting for me to take office even with +Tewfik, I would agree also to that. I should hope for success in +making those reforms of which we have already sown the +seeds—notwithstanding Tewfik’s remaining—if supported by the +English Government, and in surmounting those difficulties, both +home and foreign, which have beset Egypt in these latter times.</p> + +<p>And God is our Helper, and in Him our trust.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch18">Your sincere friend,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Ahmed Arabi the +Egyptian</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<h3><a id="appb2"></a>II. <span class="sc">Evidence as to the +Massacres at Alexandria, Tantah, and elsewhere, in 1882</span></h3> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Sheykh Mohammed Abdu to Lady +Anne Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p class="hang2">(<em>Translated from the Arabic, received 5th +August</em>, 1883, <em>from Beyrout.</em>)</p> + +<p class="salut2">To the Lady Anne Blunt. May God show us her +countenance, etc.</p> + +<p>Next, among those persons who have information about the riot in +Alexandria in particular, there is Mustafa Abd el Rahim, who was +present at the riot and stopped its rage with the regular soldiers +with Suleyman Sami (may God have mercy on him). And he is prepared +to bear witness on being requested to do so, as he has informed me +this night.</p> + +<p>And of those who have complete information of the conduct of the +Khedive Tewfik and of his endeavours and the endeavours of his +assistants to disturb the peace and tranquillity of Egypt, and to +excite the Muslems against the Christians, and vice versa, there is +here Ahmed Bey Minshawi, one of the Notables of Egypt, a man of +wealth and of determination and of extreme straightforwardness. It +was he who protected Christians in the riots of Tantah, and in +other massacres in the province of Gharbiyeh, which Ibrahim Pasha +Adhem, the Khedive’s protégé, got up after the bombardment of +Alexandria; and he is prepared to bear witness against the Khedive +and against his agents before any Court or in any<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_552">[552]</span> Tribunal—even in the Egyptian +Tribunals—and he has no fear of anything, and is not alarmed by any +danger. He has been intending to write a letter to Mr. Blunt, of +his own accord, to express his readiness and his earnest wish to +put before Englishmen, and before everyone inclined to justice and +equity, the things known to him; and he is now with us in Beyrut, +and if you wish to summon him he is ready.</p> + +<p>Convey my salutations to Mr. Blunt and present to him on my +behalf and on behalf of every Egyptian—indeed of every +Englishman—exceeding thanks for his energy and noble deeds. And +salute for me Mr. Sabunji. May God protect you in his keeping.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Mohammed Abdu</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p><em>13th Ramadan</em>, 1300.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Ahmed Bey el Minshawi to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Translated from the Arabic, received August</em> 5, +1883.)</p> + +<p class="salut">To the high-minded Mr. Blunt. May God preserve +him!</p> + +<p>After presenting salutations and praise and thanks:</p> + +<p>Also, I beg you will be my representative in presenting thanks +from me and from all Egyptians—indeed from all Eastern people, to +Lord (Randolph) Churchill and his companions—though they are all +dependent on you for what they accomplished in Parliament.</p> + +<p>Also I am prepared, with all preparation, to bear witness +against the Khedive and the men of his government as to their plan, +which they carried out, of shedding the blood of Christians and +others. In so doing I fear not the blame of any blamer, nor do I +dread the authority of any ignorant ruler in whatsoever country I +may be, or before whatsoever tribunal I may appear; and whenever +the indictment against Tewfik is officially brought forward and +witnesses are wanted I am ready in Beyrut, and if I went elsewhere +I would let you know. And I pledge myself in the name of God that I +will also bring witnesses of the Egyptians who will bear witness to +the crimes of the Khedive and his wicked accomplices.</p> + +<p>And my friend the Sheykh Mohammed Abdu knows that perfectly +well, and sends you salutations. Remain in God’s protection.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Ahmed Minshawi</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p><em>Beyrout, 15th Ramadan</em>, 1300.</p> +</div> + +<p class="center space-above15 space-below1"><span class="pagenum" +id="Page_553">[553]</span><span class="sc">Translation of remarks +by Sheykh Mohammed Abdu on Major MacDonald’s statement +(received</span> <em>Aug.</em> 13, 1884)</p> + +<p>We have read a statement by Major MacDonald, published in the +Blue Book (Egypt, 1884), in refutation of Mr. Blunt’s letter to the +“Times” newspaper, and have noticed in it certain things calling +for remark.</p> + +<p>I do not know whether a ten weeks’ residence with Mr. Cameron at +Tantah could have enabled him to understand the true state of +matters he has written about, or not.</p> + +<p>I shall not here discuss the history of Ibrahim Adhem’s +dismissal from his office as Governor; but I assert that Ibrahim +Adhem was in fact, on the upper storey of the prefecture on the day +of the massacre at Tantah, and that he was looking on from the +window of that upper storey at the murderers and the murdered; and +that these persons were murdered in the court of the Mudirieh while +he looked on at them; and that he himself ordered the water +carriers to wash the blood from the ground at the Government House +(of which evidence was given by the water carriers before the Court +of Inquiry).</p> + +<p>As to what Macdonald says about many of the Europeans finding +safety in the prefecture of police, it is true; only the person who +protected them was the chief of the city police, Ali effendi Lebîb, +who saved many lives, but was arrested after the war and kept in +prison until the end of the Inquiry, when the Court sentenced him +to hard labour for a year, after much intercession. Now what plea +was there for the arrest of this Zabit, a person worthy of +confidence; whose protection of Christians is testified to by Major +Macdonald (who understood the whole truth in ten weeks).</p> + +<p>Ibrahim Adhem is a Kurd—not a Circassian—and a man who, each +time that they gave him a post, stipulated with the Government that +he should be authorized to make use of the kurbaj on the fellahin +and the omdehs of the district. Ay, when he was Mudir of Mansourah +at the time of Riaz Pasha’s first Ministry, Riaz learned that he +was ill-treating people with the kurbaj, and wrote to him as +follows: “You are bound to act according to law, governing +mercifully; if you use the kurbaj you will incur the censure of the +law.” On receiving this communication he chose to resign his post +rather than rule mercifully and according to law.</p> + +<p>His resignation under the Mahmud Samy Ministry took place for +that reason also; and when the Khedive reappointed him as Mudir of +the Gharbieh, after the war, he carried on his government with his +habitual severity; afterwards, when the number<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_554">[554]</span> of his enemies increased and the +patience of the people of his province was so exhausted that they +could no longer bear with him, the Government disgraced him, and, +dismissing him, appointed Husseyn Pasha Sarai in his place.</p> + +<p>Ibrahim Adhem was one of the supporters of the first movement of +Arabi, but when the massacre occurred at Tantah, Arabi learned that +he had participated in it either by instigation or by deed, and +ordered him to be arrested. He was not arrested for not joining in +the rebellion, in fact he was arrested on the third day from the +massacre, before it was known whether he would give or refuse his +support. Indeed, Ibrahim Adhem’s sworn official despatches to the +Ministry of the Interior indicate sufficiently that he did not +deserve the praises lavished on him by Major Macdonald. Possibly +some of the officers of the English army may have praised him, but +I do not consider this enough to exculpate him from his deeds of +violence. Let anyone who would like to learn what measure of +savagery Ibrahim Adhem attained, inquire of his son—Ibrahim Hafzy +Bey.</p> + +<p>As to the unhappy Yusuf Abu Diab—he arrived at the railway +station on the day of the massacre about three hours after the +disturbance had begun. He did not instigate riot (anything or any +one), but saved a Christian girl and took her to the Mudirieh; and +reprimanded the Mudir, taking him to task for sitting in the +Mudirieh while he allowed people to be massacred. And for this +reason the unfortunate man was hanged. Those Europeans of whom +Macdonald testifies were in such consternation that they did not +even distinguish their own children, and were running into every +hole—how then could they know Yusuf Abu Diab, and distinguish his +face or his words?</p> + +<p>The chief of the station and telegraph at the first bore witness +to the innocence of Yusuf Abu Diab, but the Mudir Ibrahim Adhem +threatened all the people with arrest and death unless they bore +witness according to his desire; thus they altered their testimony +under coercion. The statements made by people subsequently have all +been under fear. But those Courts of Inquiry and their acts are +part and parcel of the acts of the Anglo-Egyptian Government after +the war, into which it is permissible to examine and investigate. +We know indeed what has been its course and its acts. No man in his +senses will believe in it, for it has been of that species in which +the enemy sits in judgement on his enemy; and if we would speak of +it we would have to recount the whole of the conduct of the +Government after Tel-el-Kebir, and this would lead us into too +great length—without profit.</p> + +<p>Yusuf Abu Diab’s innocence was confessed by the blood relations +of the people massacred, and they begged his pardon +from<span class="pagenum" id="Page_555">[555]</span> Lord Dufferin, +who asked it from the Khedive—and the pardon was granted, but the +order was issued secretly to hang him before the time fixed for the +execution. The news of the pardon did not arrive till after the +execution.</p> + +<p>Possibly Macdonald can testify to the Europeans—French, English, +and others—but we know the value of such testimony, and if we had a +free and fair Government it would learn the truth through a +different set of people.</p> + +<p>Seyyid Osman has published a long article in the “Intransigeant” +(French newspaper), stating all the facts. It is also well known to +a number of people that the first President of the Court of Inquiry +at Tantah wanted to carry out the investigation equitably, and to +interrogate the Mudir Ibrahim Adhem on his culpability as to the +riot, but the Government perceiving him to be upright, dismissed +him and appointed in his stead Mahmud Pasha Fellaky, who was +nominally at Tantah while his administration was at Cairo.</p> + +<p>Thus the Mudir was saved from trial, while Yusuf Abu Diab was +hanged in his stead.</p> + +<p>I could show the object of silence as to past deeds, to speak of +which would open the door wide to censure on the Government of +England, which desires to establish justice in Egypt.</p> + +<p class="center space-above15 space-below1"><span class="sc">Mr. +Blunt’s Note of a Conversation with Ismaïl Bey Jowdat at +Constantinople</span>, <em>Oct.</em> 24, 1884</p> + +<p>Ismaïl Jowdat spent 3 hours with me telling the events of the +Egyptian Revolution, much of it new, and very interesting. With +regard to the Khedive’s responsibility for the massacres he was +very explicit. His official position at the time of the war, as +Chef du Bureau Européen de la police du Caire, gave him every +opportunity of knowing the facts, and he knew them. The following +is the account he gave me which I shall transcribe from notes taken +while he was speaking:</p> + +<p>The first intrigue that he knows of in which the Khedive was +concerned was in Boheyra where the Khedive employed Ibrahim Bey +Towfik—he lived in the house of Hassaneyn Abu Hamza at Damanhour, +Governor of the province—in the spring of 1882 to purchase the +alliance of certain Sheykhs of the Oulad Ali Bedouins against the +National Ministry, to make a civil war between the Bedouins and the +army. They were engaged to make disturbance, and a regular +agreement was drawn up in which the Arabs promised to support the +Khedive against the army in the case of civil war. For this they +were to receive, and actually did receive £E13,000, the signatories +to the document being Ibrahim Bey Towfik, the<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_556">[556]</span> Mudir, and Mahmud abu Ismaïl el Aluani, +Mahareb abu Keshik, Abd ed Dayim Hoteiteh, Abu Shayib, Hassaneyn +abu Hamza and five others (Sheykhs of the Oulad Ali).</p> + +<p>Ismaïl Jowdat was sent down to Boheyra semi officially by Arabi +to inquire into this matter, and saw the Sheykhs and the document, +and persuaded them to rescind their promise to the Khedive, and +obtained from them an oath of allegiance to the National Government +in Arabi’s room at Cairo. This same Ibraham Tewfik was sent by the +Khedive during the war to Mansourah to stir up trouble, but did not +succeed there. There was a report made against him signed by all +the Notables of Dakhalieh under Mohammed Bey el Hantour sub Mudir +of the province, after which he was imprisoned by order of the +National Assembly.</p> + +<p>With regard to the riots of the 11th June at Alexandria the +details did not come under Ismaïl Jowdat’s official notice. But he +heard the main facts at the time. He heard of the riots at 5 +o’clock on the 11th, and went at once to the Palace, and heard how +it had been ordered, and about the telegram sent by the Khedive, as +we know them, viz.: that the disturbance was arranged by Omar Pasha +Lutfi with Seyd Kandil, who, however, took to his bed to avoid +being connected with its execution. He also heard at the time of a +telegram having been sent by the Khedive in cypher to Omar Lutfi +giving him his orders. But he did not see a copy of the +telegram.</p> + +<p>Of what happened during the war he had more certain knowledge, +as he was responsible for the safety of all the Europeans in the +country, and had spent some £E3,272 of his own money in finding and +keeping them—sums which have never been repaid him, though he has +the highest testimonials from M. de Martino the Italian Consul at +Cairo of the care taken by him.</p> + +<p>The Khedive’s chief agent during the war was a certain Osman +Raafat, intendant des Ecuries, who is still employed by him on +various secret missions. Immediately after the evacuation at +Alexandria he sent him in disguise to the house of his +brother-in-law, Mohammed Bey Hellál, to concert measures with +Ibrahim Pasha Adhem the Mudir; and they concerted together the +riots against the Christians in order to force on an English +intervention. Ismaïl Jowdat confirms my account given in my letter +to the “Times” with regard to Ibrahim Adhem’s conduct, except that +the Christians killed were killed at the Mudirieh, not at the +Prefecture; and Ibrahim shut himself inside the house and let the +killing continue. His words were: “Il était dans une chambre en bas +de la Mudirieh pendant le massacre. Les Chrétiens se sont réfugiés +dans la Moudirieh. Il s’est enfermé dans sa chambre et +a<span class="pagenum" id="Page_557">[557]</span> laissé faire. Les +vagabonds et galériens d’Alexandrie ont fait le massacre.” Abu Diab +did his best to stop the trouble, and protested with the Mudir, and +saved many lives. He was condemned on false testimony produced by +Ibrahim Adhem, who afterwards, moved with remorse, asked his pardon +before he suffered, but Abu Diab refused to forgive him. The only +other mistake made by me is that I called Ibrahim a Circassian. He +is a Kurd, son of the head employée of Mohammed Ali’s stables.</p> + +<p>Osman Raafat also came to Giseh during the war to raise troubles +again with the Mufettish Feridun Bey. The details of this affair +are known to M. de Martins. Sir Charles Wilson took notes of the +Tantah affair from Ismaïl Jowdat. Osman Raafat then went to the +Fayoum to stir up the Herabi Bedouins under their chief Abd el Kawi +el Jibali and Saadawi el Jibali.</p> + +<p>Ismaïl Jowdat knew these affairs at the time of their happening; +but he gained positive proof of the Khedive’s connection with them +in the following manner: Not long ago Osman Raafat came to see him +at Constantinople, and he asked him to breakfast with Husseyn Pasha +Ghaleb, one of the Sultan’s A.D.C’s., the same who called on me +yesterday; and then having plied him with wine he told them the +whole story. He went on from Constantinople to Vienna, where he had +a commission from the Khedive to invest certain sums of money and +dispose of certain jewels. Osman Raafat was arrested at Wasta by a +soldier, but was let go by a Circassian official, and thence fled +to Helouan and Suez. After the war Osman Raafat was sent by the +Khedive to get back the money taken from Palmer by the Bedouins, +and he kept £2,000 out of the £3,000.</p> + +<p class="center space-above15 space-below1"><span class="sc">Notes +of Conversation with Dr. Mustafa Bey Negdi. Extract from +Journal</span>, <em>Oct.</em> 27, 1884</p> + +<p>He (Mustafa) then gave us the whole history of the Tantah +massacre in detail, which he knew first from the official inquiry +made before Arabi when it happened, and at which he assisted, and +secondly from Ahmed Minshawi, with whom he had lived afterwards at +Beyrout, and who came here with him, and who had repeatedly told +him the story. The true facts were these:</p> + +<p>The Mudir of Tantah, Ibrahim Adhem, with Osman Raafat, excited +the populace against the Christians, as Ismaïl Jowdat related, +telling them that Arabi had ordered it—and the Mudir shut himself +up also as related. Minshawi lived at a village called Koreyshiyeh, +and happening to come in that day by train with Abdallah Pasha’s +son, Emin Bey, and Husseyn Wasif, a magistrate, they found +Christians being killed; and Minshawi interfered.<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_558">[558]</span> They called out to him that +Arabi had ordered it, but Minshawi had said to the effect of “damn +Arabi,” and insisted on their stopping. He had then gone with Abu +Diab, who had also been trying to stop the massacre, to the +Mudirieh, and had kicked in the door of his room, and expostulated +with him for letting the thing go on, Abu Diab using strong +language, for he was very angry. Then they telegraphed to Arabi at +Kafr Dowar to send soldiers to stop the massacre, but the telegram +had to go round by Ramleh and was delayed. But at last the massacre +was stopped. The whole thing was inquired into at Kafr Dowar +immediately, and the Mudir was sent to Cairo and there imprisoned +till the end of the war, Dawish Pasha replacing him. After the war +he was reinstated, and when the Commission was sent to Tantah, +Ismaïl Yusri, the President, who was a comparatively honest man, +ascertained the truth and informed the Khedive that he should be +obliged to find him guilty, and so begged to be superseded on the +Commission. This was done, and an officer less scrupulous was +appointed who accepted the false evidence Ibrahim Adhem was allowed +to trump up against Abu Diab. Ibrahim Adhem, however, was +deposed—and Huseyn Wasif (a Circassian, not the same as the +magistrate) was appointed. He it was who was made a scapegoat of +for Ibrahim Adhem’s sake, and was deprived by Clifford Lloyd and +sent to the Soudan. Mehariz Bey, formerly sub-Mudir, is now Mudir +of Boheyra. Minshawi is the son-in-law of Abdallah Pasha the +English renegade, and his son Emin still goes by the name of the +Englishman.</p> + +<p>Mustafa Bey confirms all Ismaïl’s statements of the Khedive’s +connection with the Alexandrian massacres. He was at Alexandria at +the time and was the Doctor employed to examine the bodies. There +were 51 Christian bodies, 23 Mohammedan, of which 8 Mustafezzin, +all the latter by pistol shots. The English doctor wanted to make +out that the Christian bodies had wounds made by “des armes +blanches,” but this was not the case. It was certainly Omar Lutfi +and Seyd Kandil (a blackguard he calls him), who got up the riot, +and Mustafa states his conviction that Cookson also was concerned +in it. About Malet he does not know—nor about Dervish. But he feels +sure of Cookson. His evidence will be most valuable, and he will +come to England to give it. He also says that Omar Lutfi certainly +gave orders to the Mustafezzin to come unarmed. I like this worthy +doctor much. In face and figure he is not unlike Lord Lyons.</p> + +<p class="center space-above15 space-below1"><span class="sc">Dr. +Mustafa Bey Nejdi’s further Statement of</span> <em>Nov.</em> 5, +1884</p> + +<p>“Peu de jours après le bombardment nous avons appris à +Kafr<span class="pagenum" id="Page_559">[559]</span> Dowar qu’il y +a eu des Chrétiens tués à Tantah; et Toulba Pacha, d’après l’ordre +d’Arabi, a envoyé chercher Ahmed Minshawi pour témoigner sur ce qui +y était arrivé. Celui-ci est venu avec un autre notable nommé El +Arabi au camp, et Arabi Pacha lui a demandé ce qui en était. +J’étais présent avec Toulba Pacha et quelques Colonels. Ahmed +Minshawi a répondu qu’il était venu à Tantah et qu’il y avait sauvé +la vie à un Chrétien à la gare du chemin de fer, et qu’après il a +fait venir ses gens de son village et qu’il a pu étouffer les +massacres. Il nous a racconté que le Mudir Ibrahim Adhem et Meheriz +son adjoint s’étaient enfermés dans la Moudirieh pendant qu’on +tuait le monde, même chez le Mudir. Il nous a aussi dit qu’il avait +télégraphié au Khedive et à Arabi Pacha, et Arabi a fait venir le +télégraphiste de Kafr Dowar qui n’en savait rien mais il a expliqué +la chose en disant que les télégrammes de Tantah à Kafr Dowar +devaient d’abord passer à Alexandrie avant d’être remis à +destination. C’était la règle du service. Sur ce Arabi a fait une +station nouvelle au camp, pour que les dépêches pourraient lui +venir directement de l’intérieur. Arabi a remercié Minshawi de ce +qu’il avait fait et il est retourné chez lui.”</p> + +<p class="center space-above15 space-below1"><span class= +"sc">Minshawi’s Evidence as given by him</span> <em>Nov.</em> 3, +1884</p> + +<p>On the day of the massacre of Tantah I came in to Tantah by +train from my own village, Koreyshiyeh, two hours distant +(half-hour by train) partly to see my brother-in-law Emin Bey on +his road to Cairo, partly to learn the news; and while at the +station we heard a great noise and were told that it was the +Christians being killed by the mob in Tantah; and I, wishing to end +this, telegraphed to the Khedive at Ramleh and to the Ministry +(that is to say Arabi at Kafr Dowar) asking an order to interfere. +I also telegraphed to my village for men to come and help me, and I +waited four hours (during that time Abu Diab arrived from Damietta) +for an answer and no answer came. And while we were there waiting +the tumult came near us, and a man, a Syrian Christian, the cashier +of Zananiri the interpreter of the Greek Consulate, ran towards me +pursued by a soldier of the Mudirieh and called to me for +protection; and taking a stick from one of the bystanders I drove +the soldier away, and with the help of others put a stop to what +was happening at the station. Then I went with these to the door of +the Mudirieh to inquire what the Mudir was doing, and to call upon +him to interfere and put an end to the bloodshed. And on my way I +met Abu Diab at the door of the Mudirieh who had come from Damietta +and was also restoring order, and who had under his protection a +young Christian<span class="pagenum" id="Page_560">[560]</span> +girl whom he was leading by the hand, and we went together to the +Mudirieh, and when we arrived there we found in the courtyard three +corpses of Christians who had just been killed there; and we asked +for the Mudir and were told that he was in his room, one of the +rooms adjoining the courtyard. And we called to him, but there was +no answer. Then Abu Diab kicked the door in, and we found Ibrahim +Adhem, the Mudir, with his wakil, Meheriz, sitting there. And Abu +Diab in a loud voice asked them what they were doing there allowing +these murders to be done in his house by his own men. And when they +made no answer he called to Ibrahim Adhem, calling him a dog and a +coward. I heard this with my ears. Next I went to the Khan where I +heard the Christians had shut themselves up, and I found a mob +trying to force the door, and my men having come an hour afterwards +from Koreyshiyeh we drove them away and found inside a large number +of Christians, Syrians, Jews, and others, huddled together like +frightened sheep. And I put guards, and the next day brought them +out and took them to my village, and after some days those that +wished to leave the country I took by train to Port Said, two +trains full; and those (about 120) that chose to remain I took to +my own house and fed them there during the whole time of the +war.</p> + +<p>Some days later I went to Kafr Dowar and gave evidence as I now +give it before Arabi Pasha when he made an inquiry into the affair, +and Ibrahim Adhem was sent a prisoner to Cairo and another man +(Dawish Pasha) appointed by the Government in his place. I also +gave my evidence after the war when the first Commission came to +Tantah (there was no Englishman on this Commission), and afterwards +they gave me a paper to sign, purporting to be my evidence, but it +was not what I had said but the contrary, and I refused to sign it. +Much pressure was put upon me to make me do this; and one day in +the Khedive’s palace at Cairo, on his fête day, Bairam el Kebir, +Takla Bey Bishara warned me that if I did not sign I should suffer +for it. I also refused Ahmed el Sherif, sent by Sultan Pasha, when +he came round the villages to take money for the sword given to +Wolseley.</p> + +<p>When a new Commission under Ismaïl Yusri and the English came to +Tantah they did not ask me for my evidence (Ismaïl Yusri warned me +in private not to mention that I had sent a telegram to the +Khedive, of which the copy has been found in the telegraph office, +to ask for an order to interfere) of what had happened at Tantah +but only as to those killed at Santah. They therefore did not take +my evidence.</p> + +<p>I declare that Abu Diab was entirely innocent, and that of those +hanged at Tantah for this matter only 2 were guilty, Abu +Salaam<span class="pagenum" id="Page_561">[561]</span> of Santah, +and a soldier of the Mudirieh. Ibrahim Adhem and Mehariz were the +cause of the bloodshed. The killing was done by the vagabonds from +Alexandria and the soldiers of the Mudirieh. The same thing +happened at three other places—at Tantah 49 killed; at Santah 3 +were killed; at Mehallet el Kebir 6 or 7; at Mehallet abu Ali jem +el Suk 2 or 3. Also the same thing would have happened at Dumanhour +but for the Wakil Abd el Razak whom the Khedive has sent in chains +for 15 years to the Soudan. I heard of Osman Raafat being at Tantah +on the day of the massacre in the house of one of his +brothers-in-law. He has two brothers-in-law at Tantah, Mohammed +Hellal and Ibrahim Hellal.</p> + +<p>Ibrahim Adhem was restored as Mudir after the war, and he got up +the evidence against Abu Diab in revenge for the words spoken by +him on the day of the massacre. Abu Diab died an innocent man. He +was not discouraged to the last, but told his father not to weep +and told the executioner to make haste. At the last moment Ibrahim +Adhem asked his pardon. But Abu Diab said, “God will judge between +us to-night, to-day for me, to-morrow for you.” I assure you, Sir, +by God, that Abu Diab died unjustly.</p> + +<p>Before the Commission had left Tantah Ibrahim Adhem came one day +to my village with 4 English officers, and summoned all the +notables of the neighbourhood and declared to them that I was in +disgrace with the Khedive and the English, and warned them to have +no dealings with me, and that if any had a quarrel against me the +Khedive would support him against me, and four months passed and no +one came. Until the day of the massacre I was respected by all men. +I had no quarrel with Ibrahim Adhem nor any one; but my action that +day has been the cause of my ruin. When Ibrahim Adhem was removed +from Tantah, Husseyn Pasha Wasif was appointed in his place. He +received me into favour, but the Khedive wrote to him by his own +secretary not to see me. Husseyn Pasha shewed me this letter—I saw +it with my eyes—and begged me to excuse him if he asked me to come +no more to his house. This drove me from my country. It is clear +that by saving the lives of the Christians that day I have gained +only anger from the Khedive and trouble.</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Prince Halim to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Balta-Liman, 15 <em>Décembre</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Mon cher Monsieur +Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>Je vous remercie d’avoir pensé à m’écrire; j’aurais voulu en +vous répondant vous donner des nouvelles de chez vous; +malheureusement<span class="pagenum" id="Page_562">[562]</span> +heureusement dans notre paresseux Orient les choses ne changent pas +aussi souvent que dans votre actif Occident. Ici les jours se +suivent et se ressemblent, il n’y a donc rien qui vaille la peine +de vous être rapporté. Depuis quelques jours j’aperçois des signes +non équivoques d’une tendance de rapprochement avec l’Angleterre; +des communications ont eu lieu entre Monsieur Wyndham et la Porte +en vu de trouver un terrain propice qui permettrait aux deux partis +de traiter les affaires égyptiennes. Je crains que cette fois +encore la Turquie et l’Angleterre n’aient, par leur lenteur, manqué +le moment favourable de pouvoir en finir entre elles. Les +puissances signataires du traité de 1841-42 paraissent vouloir se +mêler de la question; elles trouveraient peut-être mauvais que la +Porte traitât directement avec l’Angleterre; dans ce cas le nouvel +ambassadeur d’Angleterre, quel qu’il fût, il est très douteux qu’il +puisse réussir dans le sens du désir de son Gouvernement. Tout +dépend de la pression plus ou moins grande qu’exercera +l’Europe.</p> + +<p>Je porterai à la connaissance du Sultan ce que je croirai lui +être utile, sans cependant m’illusioner sur le résultat, car il est +inutile de chercher de la vigueur, de la précision, dans les actes +du Gouvernement Impérial. La peur, plus que l’intérêt même, +présidera à toutes ses actions, quoiqu’on fasse. La bienveillance +de Musurus Pacha pour Tewfik est sans doute le resultât du mariage +de son fils avec la fille d’un certain Antoniadis, partisan +d’Ismaïl, comme tous les voleurs.</p> + +<p>A propos d’Ismaïl, je vous dirai qu’il dépense beaucoup d’argent +ici, et j’en sens les effets. Le brave homme donne son or contre de +la parole qu’emporte aussitôt le vent. Avant que cette lettre vous +parvienne Monsieur Whittaker sera à Londres, il vous communiquera +une proposition qui je crois aura votre pleine approbation.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch6">Recevez etc.,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Halim</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Prince Halim to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Balta-Liman, 6 <em>Janvier</em>, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Cher Monsieur Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>C’est le 4 janvier seulement que j’ai reçu votre lettre du 19 +Décembre.</p> + +<p>Je suis avec intérêt dans les journaux les péripéties de vos +démarches, tant près de l’association international d’arbitrage et +de paix, que près du Premier Ministre. Je suis tout à fait de votre +opinion et je dirai qu’une terminaison à l’amiable et sans violence +de la question égyptienne ne peut se faire sans le concours du +Sultan parce qu’il est la légalité, le droit; mais, si on veut +passer outre, alors c’est l’inconnu et on ne peut savoir comment et +où on<span class="pagenum" id="Page_563">[563]</span> aboutira. Je +trouve que l’Angleterre a perdu comme la Turquie un temps précieux; +ces deux puissances pouvaient l’arranger à l’amiable entre elles +sans laisser de place à l’ingérance des autres puissances peut-être +même de la France; l’Angleterre aurait beaucoup gagné et la Turquie +aurait eu aussi sa part de bénéfice. Maintenant que les Puissances +font mine de vouloir prendre en main la question égyptienne sous +prétexte qu’elle est internationale, je crois que l’Angleterre et +la Turquie ont perdu, toujours dans la prévision que les Puissances +s’occuperont sérieusement de la question.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch6">Recevez, etc.,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Halim</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Prince Halim to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Balta-Liman, 19 <em>Janvier</em>, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Cher Monsieur Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>Votre lettre du 8 janvier m’est parvenue, je veux remercier pour +les nouvelles que vous voulez bien me donner.</p> + +<p>Il est probable que Hassan Fehmi Pacha sera à Londres avant que +vous receviez cette lettre. Je considère la mission de l’envoyé +Ottoman comme une preuve patente de la bonne volonté de sa Majesté +le Sultan de relier les bonnes vieilles rélations des deux +gouvernements que les évènements d’Egypte ont un peu terni. En tout +cas, c’est un pas fait vers un arrangement, mais je doute que +Hassan Pacha puisse arriver à une solution définitive.</p> + +<p>Les dernières nouvelles reçues du Soudan se montrent par l’état +critique de l’expédition anglaise, si les troupes qui traversent le +désert entre Korti et Mutamma arrivent sans encombre à cette +dernière ville la ⅘ de la besogne serait faite sans doute. Alors +seulement le Gouvernement Anglais pensera peut-être sérieusement à +donner une solution à la question égyptienne. Je ne serais pas +étonné si Souakin et Masaoua ou tout au moins un de ces deux ports +resta définitivement entre les mains de l’Angleterre.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch5">Recevez, etc.,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Halim</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Prince Halim to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Balta-Liman, 13 <em>Février</em>, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Cher Monsieur Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>Selon votre désir j’ai remis la lettre en arabe adressée par +vous à Sa Majesté Impériale le Sultan; je l’ai fait accompagner par +votre lettre adressée à moi; aussitôt que j’aurai une réponse je ne +manquerai pas de vous le faire connaître immédiatement. Je n’ai pas +jugé nécessaire de présenter au Sultan votre rapport à +Hassan<span class="pagenum" id="Page_564">[564]</span> Pacha +Fehmi—Sa Majesté aimant les primeurs en tout. Je n’ai pas reçu la +pièce que vous m’annonciez m’être envoyé par votre secretaire.</p> + +<p>Rien de nouveau ici si ce n’est l’entrée en scène de l’Italie +d’une manière extravagante, il en sera de même tant que la Turquie +se bornera à protester chaque fois qu’on lui marchera sur le +pied.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">A vous, etc.</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Halim</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p class="space-above15">P.S. Personne ne peut répondre de la +fermeté du Gouvernement Ottoman.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Letter to H.M. the Sultan of +Turkey (Abdul Hamid)</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Sent also in Arabic.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Crabbet Park, Three Bridges, Sussex, +<em>January</em> 3, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>The grave perils which on every side menace the Mohammedan +nation and which cannot but distress Your Majesty in the discharge +of your high duties towards your people must be my excuse if I +venture to address you on certain points which appear to me of +vital moment in the present conjuncture of affairs for Islam.</p> + +<p>It will not be unknown to Your Majesty that for some years past +I have travelled widely in Mohammedan lands and that circumstances +have placed me in a position to learn the thoughts, the fears, and +the aspirations of those who under various governments acknowledge +Your Majesty as their chief, the supreme Head and Prince of their +religion; and Your Majesty also doubtless knows the active part I +took three years ago in endeavouring to prevent the great +misfortune of the invasion of Egypt by my countrymen, and +afterwards to set in a true light the injustice of their action and +the supreme miseries which they have caused. I trust therefore that +Your Majesty will accept as the ideas of one devoted in all his +heart to Mohammedan interests and Your Majesty’s, the view of +policy which I now presume to lay before you.</p> + +<p>1. With regard to those Mohammedans who live under other rule +than Your Majesty’s,—I can assert without fear of mistake that at +no other period of modern history has the Caliphal authority +exercised so powerful an influence on their imagination as now. In +all parts of the world Mohammedans are conscious of the danger to +them as a nation; and the sacred office held by Your Majesty is +regarded by them as the only safeguard remaining of their political +existence. Especially within the last four years have they learned +the necessity of closer union under Your Majesty’s +command,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_565">[565]</span> if they +would not become altogether lost and scattered; and they are +willing as they never were before to put aside the differences of +opinion which have so long divided them and to accept Your Majesty +as the fountain for them of authority. On this subject I have +conversed with many learned men in many countries, and I find that +what they practically desire is this. The evils of which they +complain are a decay of sound education, a decay of morals and a +decay of wealth; and they attribute these misfortunes not indeed to +a defect of the sacred law, which they all hold to be sufficient, +but to a defect of the power to interpret it in accordance with +modern necessities, and of the authority which should enforce that +interpretation and make it binding on men’s practice. They desire +therefore that Your Majesty should be pleased to consider in what +way it would be possible to encourage the meeting of some general +assembly of Ulemas of various lands under Your Majesty’s supreme +appointment to discuss all these matters, and devise remedies for +their very urgent needs. They think that by a common agreement +alone of the faithful of all lands under Your Majesty a true result +could be obtained.</p> + +<p>This they desire and also that Your Majesty should take a more +open part in the exercise of your high office by issuing from time +to time and publishing authoritative statements of your views +regarding the many public events which arise, gravely interesting +to Mohammedans at large, in order that these may be kept in closer +sympathy with Your Majesty on matters concerning all. Thus it seems +to me that it would be of supreme advantage at the present moment +that Your Majesty should take the whole Mohammedan world into your +confidence with regard to the English occupation of Egypt. The +strength of Your Majesty’s position lies in the moral influence you +possess over the vast populations outside Your Majesty’s own +Empire, and this can only be exercised to its full extent by making +your wishes public. Advantage has too long been taken by European +Governments of Your Majesty’s silence to spread false reports +regarding Your Majesty’s ideas; and in these modern days no Power +can afford to dispense with publicity as a spiritual weapon.</p> + +<p>2. With regard to Your Majesty’s own dominions I am encouraged +by the high character Your Majesty bears as a sincere Reformer, to +urge upon you to take cognizance of the many abuses and breaches of +the law which afflict the remoter provinces of your Empire. These +to my sorrow I have noted on my many journeys; and I know that they +are a scandal to the world and a cause of National weakness. I +could, if Your Majesty would permit, explain in what way I think +they could be remedied; and<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_566">[566]</span> Your Majesty may trust me not to recommend +those European remedies which Your Majesty rightly judges to be +unsuited to the genius of Eastern lands and subversive of the +principles of their religion. I should ask Your Majesty neither to +grant concessions to Europeans, nor to employ Europeans in your +Government, nor to adopt European forms of Administration. The +reforms I would advocate are different from these, and are on the +contrary designed to establish Mohammedan Government on its true +national basis and in stricter accordance with its religious law. +In this way I am confident that, God aiding Your Majesty, a sound +political and financial basis could be secured for Your Empire.</p> + +<p>Lastly—I would urge upon Your Majesty a certain course of policy +towards the Great European Powers, who one and all covet your +dominions. It is essential for any plan of reform and recuperation +that an interval of peace should be secured you. The two +Governments which most threaten the Mohammedan nation at this +moment are the Russian and I grieve to say my own, and they must be +dealt with vigorously each in its own manner. The present is an +opportunity of the most favourable for making terms with England, +but these can only be secured advantageously for Islam by courage +and determination. Your Majesty must declare yourself in clear +language according to certain terms as to which I could advise Your +Majesty; and I think that I can assure you of success. But I +venture to warn Your Majesty against any concession of principle +which might separate you from the full approval of Mohammedans in +various lands. The part which is yours to play in your dealings +with our Government is that of the fearless exponent of the +Mohammedan will. As Sultan of Turkey Your Majesty has undoubted +rights in Egypt, but in this age of lawless aggression it is +necessary that sovereign rights should be backed by the popular +will and in Your Majesty’s instance by that full exercise of your +Caliphal authority which is yours as Prince of the Faithful.</p> + +<p>If Your Majesty on the perusal of this letter will deign to hear +me further I will make it my duty to lay my plan in detail before +Your Majesty.</p> + +<p>I am, with profound respect, Your Majesty, Your most faithful +servant.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Prince Halim to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Constantinople, 17 <em>Juillet</em> 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Cher Monsieur Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>J’ai reçu votre lettre du 3 courant qui m’annonce l’achat +des<span class="pagenum" id="Page_567">[567]</span> chevaux. Je +vous remercie pour la peine que vous vous êtes donnée pour +cela.</p> + +<p>Mr. Whitaker n’est pas encore de retour. En attendant, ce que je +vois dans le journaux ne me parait pas être très différent du +passé. Lord Salisbury dans l’exposé de la politique du nouveau +cabinet, fait à la chambre des Lords le 6 courant, déclare que +l’Angleterre est liée d’honneur au Khedive. Un premier Ministre ne +s’engage au fond comme cela, s’il avait l’intention de suivre une +autre voie que ses prédécesseurs. Le lien d’honneur n’est pas +facile à briser, comme par exemple le lien d’intérêt, où on a la +faculté de se montrer désintéressé même magnanime en le brisant. +Lord Salisbury donne pour raison du lien d’honneur, l’honêteté du +Khédive, vis-à-vis du gouvernement Anglais et il n’y a que quelques +jours que Tewfik Pacha protestait de son dévoument et de son +inaltérable attachement à Sa Majesté Impériale le Sultan, en +jettant sur la pression irrésistible des Anglais tout le passé. Ces +protestations du Khédive sont prises ici pour ce qu’elles valent et +pour la forme on se montre content. Le grand cordon du Schafcate à +été envoyé à sa femme comme preuve de la satisfaction +Impériale,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">Je vous renouvelle, cher Monsieur Blunt, +l’expression, etc.</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Halim</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_568">[568]</span><a id= +"appc"></a>APPENDIX C</h2> + +<p class="sch1">AUTHOR’S CORRESPONDENCE WITH DOWNING STREET</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">The Earl of Dufferin to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Cairo, 16 <em>December</em> ’82.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>Many thanks for your letter of December 8th, and especially for +having sent me the pamphlet, of which I had heard, and which I have +studied with the attention it seems to deserve.</p> + +<p>I am quite alive to the importance of the question you refer to +of the indebtedness of the peasantry. It is one of those evils +which meet us both in India and in Ireland, and you may depend upon +my doing my best to discover a remedy if any such there be.</p> + +<p>We have induced the Government to let out of prison at once, +something like 450 of those who have been shut up in jail.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch3">Yours sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Dufferin</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to the Earl of +Dufferin</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right"><em>January 23rd</em>, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Lord Dufferin</span>,</p> + +<p>I have delayed thanking you for your letter of the 16th December +informing me of the release of 450 of the political prisoners, +until I had seen Napier and learned from him a little more clearly +than I could by letter what were the terms of agreement come to +with regard to them when the trial was compromised. I had +understood from Broadley that the terms would include an amnesty, +and I had hoped it would have been a general one, and that the +whole of the unfortunate people detained in the prisons on charges +rising out of the “rebellion” would have been set free. Now, +however, it seems that, though an amnesty has been decreed, many +exceptions to it have been made, that while some have been +released, others are being arrested, and that the Courts are still +trying and executing men on criminal charges connected with the +events of June and July. I trust that the interest I take in +opposing this particular form of injustice will excuse me with you +if I say a few words on the matter. The world, it is true, is full +of injustice which we cannot remedy, but here the remedy would seem +within our hands, and the injustice is one for which every +Englishman who knows the facts is responsible.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_569">[569]</span>First, as +regards the exceptions made to the amnesty, it would seem most +unfair that the leaders of the “rebellion” having foregone their +right of being publicly defended, any of their followers or +associates should be punished for rebellion. Arabi’s defence +included the defence of every man in Egypt, and with the +commutation of his sentence every other sentence should have been +commuted. The two strongest cases I have heard of, of persons +excepted from the amnesty, are Akkad’s and Awwam’s, men charged +with no crime, but who have nevertheless been exiled, the one to +Massowah and the other to the White Nile, punishments which Malet +has, I think, explained in his despatches to be equivalent to +death. These two cases I also recommend to your special attention +from the fact that the sufferers are men whose quarrel was +originally with English, not Egyptian, officials, and whose +exception from the amnesty has consequently a rather compromising +appearance for them. Akkad’s original offence lay in his having +protested in 1879 against Rivers Wilson’s confiscation of the +Moukabalah claims, a thing he was perfectly justified in doing, +which, moreover, he had been invited to do by a notice published by +Wilson in the papers. For this he was sent by Riaz on a false +charge to the White Nile; the details, Napier tells me, he has laid +already before you.</p> + +<p>Awwam’s case is still stronger, and it affects Colvin. Awwam was +an employé under Colvin on the Cadastral survey, and was dismissed +for having drawn up a report showing the incapacity of the officers +conducting the survey and their waste of public money—all which is +now admitted. The wrong done him made a martyr of him with the +Nationalists, and when Arabi came into office in February he was +appointed his secretary. For this, and presumably at Colvin’s +suggestion, he was arrested by the English authorities on their +landing at Alexandria in July, and put in irons. He then wrote a +letter to the Khedive demanding to know the reason of his arrest, +and was transferred, still in irons, to the Borgho prison, where +Ninet saw him seventy-four days afterwards. Then, when the +disclosures relating to that prison began to be made, Awwam would +seem to have been sent without trial to Khartoum, and is probably +there at the present moment. These are strong cases, but I have +little doubt there are many others quite as strong.</p> + +<p>Secondly. It is surely a mockery to decree an amnesty affecting +only persons who happen to be actually in prison, and omitting from +its operation both men already dealt with and men to be dealt with +in the future on charges connected with the past. From all I hear +the reign of terror has not been diminished in the provinces by the +decree—whatever may be the case at Cairo—the prisons are still full +and men are being arrested daily.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_570">[570]</span>Lastly. I cannot +understand how it can be the wish of our Government to make +scapegoats of the rank and file of those charged with the criminal +acts of June and July while the chief offenders enjoy immunity. If +one thing has been proved to the satisfaction of the Government +more than another, it is that Omar Lutfi was responsible for the +murderous character of the riots of the 11th of June. Yet we read +still of executions at Alexandria for crimes committed on that day +by others, the chief culprit himself being the while at large, in +honour, and holding high office under the Khedive. I say nothing of +the Khedive himself, though you doubtless know how little his +conduct on that day would have borne investigation.</p> + +<p>Having thus discharged my conscience of what I consider a duty, +let me now allude to the other part of your letter, that relating +to the debts of the fellahin. It was the scheme of Arabi and the +Nationalists last February to solve the difficulty by making it +illegal to lend money on mortgage of land except with the consent +of an officer to be appointed for the purpose in the chief town of +each district, and then only to an amount small in proportion to +land value. Thus the only borrowers would have been persons able +and intending to repay. I quite understand that such a regulation +might have checked the flow of capital into the country and in +consequence have reduced the public revenue, but the object of the +Nationalists was to prevent at all costs the passing of the land +into the hands of strangers; and I repeat that this <em>must</em> +be prevented if there is to be a cessation of the popular +discontent in Egypt. This seems to me a far more vital matter than +the form of government of the country, or even the reform of the +administration. But probably it can only be effected by a reduction +of the revenue, and consequently of the rate of interest on the +debt. The Nationalists also intended to form a National Bank to +make the required advances. But I feel that very likely it is +useless my saying anything on this head, for I fear the Government +at home has no serious desire to effect anything but a makeshift +arrangement agreeable to the European public, and strong enough to +last their time. I wish you could have seen Mohammed Abdu or some +others of the Nationalist leaders before they left Egypt. They +would have told you in an hour more than you could learn from all +the English officials at Cairo in a fortnight. Nevertheless I beg +you to believe that I still look confidently for a solution +compatible with Egyptian aspirations at your hands, and I remain +yours truly,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_571">[571]</span><span class="sc">The Earl of Dufferin to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private and Confidential.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Cairo, <em>12th Feb.</em> ’83.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I hasten to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of the 23rd +of January. It must have been delayed en route.</p> + +<p>You are really under a wrong impression as to what is going on +here, as you will see by the enclosed memorandum from Sir Charles +Wilson, to whom I referred your letter.</p> + +<p>As for el Accad, he is quite unworthy of the interest you take +in him. His complicity with Arabi is beyond doubt, and he +misappropriated some funds which Halim Pasha entrusted to him for +the purpose of bribing Arabi to support his, Halim’s, +candidature.</p> + +<p>I have sent home a report on the reorganization of Egypt, from +which you will see that I am doing what I can to promote the +establishment of just principles of Government in this country.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch3">Believe me, my dear Blunt, yours +sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Dufferin</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p class="space-above15">P.S.—I need not remind you that there is +no man who has done more to prevent this Government from exercising +undue severity in the case of the rebels than Sir Charles +Wilson.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. Hamilton</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, James Street, <em>January</em> 16, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Eddy</span>,</p> + +<p>I think you will admit that the despatches published to-day, +taken in connection with Colvin’s reappointment as Controller in +Egypt, absolve me from any duty of reticence I may have had toward +Mr. Gladstone on the events of the past year. In spite of all that +has been said and promised and avowed, annexation stares us in the +face as unmistakably as if the word had been written. I am sorry, +more than for Egypt, that it should have come to this.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch15">Yours affec.,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>12th March</em> ’83.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>As Campbell Bannerman has to answer a question this afternoon +founded on your letter which will (I understand) amount to what he +could tell you, were he to see you, perhaps an +interview<span class="pagenum" id="Page_572">[572]</span> would be +of little good. He tells me that every piece of fresh information +they get at the Admiralty (<em>e.g.</em> from Lord Alcester) fully +confirms his account in the House of Commons; and therefore it +seems to resolve itself into a question of the known intentions of +the authorities in Egypt as well as of the Government at home +against what Gill and Palmer <em>fancied</em> their mission to have +been.</p> + +<p>I apologize for having perhaps expressed myself too strongly +yesterday. But the Government have nothing in the world to conceal; +and the organisers of the Expedition surely ought to know better +the objects of it than the unfortunate men charged with the +mission.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch6">Yours as always affec.,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. Edward +Hamilton</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Paris, <em>Sep.</em> 14, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Eddy</span>,</p> + +<p>When I saw you on Wednesday I told you that I had thought of +taking Sabunji with me, but had given up the idea. Since then, +however, I have heard that the man I counted on to help me in Egypt +is no longer there, and I have consequently determined to take +Sabunji. The fact is I should be very helpless without him, and if +it should so happen that I could be of any good it would be as well +to have him at hand.</p> + +<p>I shall leave him at Port Said or Suez till I have seen Baring, +and as I told you, I have no intention of doing anything without +Baring’s countenance. If Baring will not listen to anything I have +to propose I shall not waste any time in Egypt, but shall go on to +Ceylon and India. I shall caution Sabunji to get into no mischief, +and he has always acted as far as I am aware squarely in his +service with me. We start to-night for Marseilles, and so farewell. +I will write to you from Egypt.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch15">Yours affec.,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. Hamilton</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Cairo, <em>September 28th</em>, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Eddy</span>,</p> + +<p>I promised to write to you, and I will keep my promise, but you +must not expect me to say anything pleasant or flattering. I found +Baring extremely amiable and willing to listen to all I had to say, +and I believe he told me his own views frankly. Our +ideas<span class="pagenum" id="Page_573">[573]</span> on many of +the reforms wanted in Egypt were the same. His scheme for relieving +the debts of the peasantry seemed a sound one—and he struck me +generally as being a man of sympathy and courage. But when I have +said this I have said all. On the main point of giving Egypt back +her liberty we are worlds apart. He neither wishes it, nor has the +least idea of attempting it. “What Egypt wants,” he told me, “is +peace and order, not another revolution; we have restored the +Khedive and the Circassians to power, and I shall do my best to +keep them there.”</p> + +<p>With regard to Dufferin’s famous Charter I find neither he nor +any one else look upon it as in the least serious or in the least +important—and they are right. The elections are not serious, nor +were ever intended to be by those who drafted the Charter. The +electoral lists are drawn up by the Government, the voting takes +place under the eye of the Governor and in the Prefecture of +Police—and in most instances the Governor or the Prefect of Police +are the candidates chosen. It could not have been otherwise. The +Circassians have been encouraged to re-establish their rule by a +reign of terror. There is no protection of any kind against +arbitrary arrest, arbitrary confiscation of property, and +imprisonment without trial. The prisons in the country districts +are still full of untried men. There is no liberty of speech, or of +the press—and at Alexandria they began the elections by hanging two +more men charged with instigating the riots of last year. How +should any one but the Prefect of Police be chosen? Mr. Gladstone, +who knows everything, doubtless knows that in India, where the +people have been crushed for ages, they worship Siva the god of +destruction. Here they worship the Prefect of Police. Yet less than +two years ago there were both freedom of speech and of the press, +elections fairly representative, and the beginning of a real +Constitution. It may have been necessary for Imperial or +international reasons to destroy this and to revert to a system of +“peace and order” as Baring calls it, but it cannot be necessary to +talk of having given the Egyptians liberty!</p> + +<p>Baring himself is too honest to pretend that his system is +anything but “Egypt for the Turks.” But he fancies he can manage +Tewfik and the half dozen men who form his party, and give Egypt a +mitigated and not altogether inhuman despotism. If he succeeds in +this he will have accomplished something, but I cannot believe that +he will at all succeed. Tewfik and Sherif have no following in this +country beyond the palace walls, and, even supposing them to be the +absolutely supple tools Baring believes them to be, they have no +kind of moral influence and very little energy. The minor English +officials tell me they are unable to redress the least wrong or +introduce the simplest reform in the departments in which +they<span class="pagenum" id="Page_574">[574]</span> serve; and +that Baring and Maxwell should be able, through the weak medium of +Tewfik, and Sherif, and Fakri, to do more than obtain a shadow of +justice and compassion for the people I cannot understand. You know +how different this is from my own idea of reforming the people +through men of their own race whom they respect, and are ready to +work with, and you may imagine my disappointment at getting from +Baring nothing better than poor Malet’s stale idea of Egypt for the +Turks.</p> + +<p>I spoke to Sir Benson Maxwell, who is a really good man, about +getting some kind of protection for the people from arbitrary +arrest, and he has promised to do so. But he is going away on leave +and nothing will be even begun before Christmas. On the whole it +seems to me that no fate could possibly have been devised for Egypt +more sad or more hopeless than what I see before me, and it would +have been far more merciful to have put the Egyptians at once out +of their misery by annexing their country last year than to play at +giving them “<em>native</em> rule,” under conditions which through +much suffering will lead to exactly the same result a year or two +years hence. I consequently leave Egypt a sadder and a wiser man +than I came. I shall publish my poem—and make my protest and set +out “to-morrow for fresh fields and pastures new.”</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch8">Yours, etc.,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p class="space-above15">PS.—I wonder whether Mr. Gladstone knows +that there are still twelve Bedouins in prison at Suez arrested for +the Palmer murder and untried. Among them a woman and two or three +children kept as hostages!!</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Sir Evelyn +Baring</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Cairo, <em>Oct.</em> 1, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir Evelyn</span>,</p> + +<p>I have received a letter from Abd el Razak Bey, F.R.G.S., +ex-director of the Naval College, who with some four others has +been in prison here for the last three months on a charge +originally of connection with a political plot. He was, however, +ordered to be dismissed by the Commission appointed to inquire into +the matter, but was nevertheless retained by Osman Pasha Ghaleb +through superior orders “on suspicion,” and is still in the Zaptieh +prison. He now asks me to come and see him, and as I am leaving +Cairo to-morrow I shall be much obliged to you if you can kindly +obtain me an order to enter the prison.</p> + +<p>Since seeing you on Wednesday I have had opportunities +of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_575">[575]</span> ascertaining the +feelings of the people here, and I am convinced that unless +something is speedily done to relieve their sufferings you will +have trouble.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch9">I am, dear Sir Evelyn, yours +truly,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Sir Evelyn Baring to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Cairo, <em>Oct.</em> 1, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Mr. Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I regret that I am unable to accede to the request contained in +your letter. The decision as to permission being given to prisoners +to receive visits lies entirely within the competence of the +Egyptian Government. I must decline to interfere in the manner in +which they exercise their discretion in dealing with the +subject.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch3">Very truly yours,</p> + +<p class="right">E. <span class="sc">Baring</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Sir Evelyn +Baring</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Suez, <em>October 3rd</em>, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir Evelyn</span>,</p> + +<p>Your note by some accident was posted by your cavass instead of +being sent by hand, and so did not reach me till just as I was +leaving Cairo yesterday morning, and I think it is right you should +know that receiving no answer I had already gone to the prison, and +seen Abd el Razak Bey and the others. I found them comfortably +lodged and in good health, with the exception of Mustapha Bey +Sidki, who seemed seriously ill, and I received from them all the +same account, that their release had been ordered by the Commission +(which included two of the Belgians who came here as judges) more +than three months ago, since which time no further inquiries had +been made into their case. Abd el Razak had written to the Khedive, +but without reply, and they believe themselves to be detained by +the order of Osman Pasha Ghaleb. No English inspector had been to +see them, and no inquiry had been made into their case. Now, +however, that I have got your letter I fear that, should my visit +become known to the Prefect of Police, or the fact that they wrote +to me, the prisoners might be made to suffer from their and my +imprudence. They believe themselves likely to be sent without +further trial to the Soudan, and, as so many have suffered that +fate during the past year, I trust that you will give them your +protection. They were arrested on a charge which would seem to have +been false, for their release was ordered by the court which +examined it, and in any other country in the world they would be +now at liberty.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_576">[576]</span>As far as I can +learn, Lord Dufferin interfered with these matters as long as he +was here, for he had promised a political amnesty at the time of +Arabi’s trial, but after his departure arrests were again made, and +I understand on very high authority that there are at the present +moment several thousand untried prisoners in the various towns of +the Delta and Upper Egypt. I can speak from experience of the +terror in which respectable people, in no way connected with the +army, but known to have sympathized with the Liberal party, are now +living in Cairo, and, as I said before, the excessive tyranny of +the police and the Mudirs is goading men to new disquiet. Trusting +that you will forgive me for not having waited for your answer, and +that as far as the prisoners are concerned the fact of their having +written to me and of my having seen them may be kept a secret, I +remain, dear Sir Evelyn,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch15">Yours very truly,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. Hamilton</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Suez, <em>October 3rd</em>, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Eddy</span>,</p> + +<p>You will have perceived that when I wrote the other day I was +very angry, and I think that I had cause. But that is no reason why +I should not write again. When I saw Baring I had not had any +conversation with my own political friends, and I could not guess +the condition of affairs. Now I have seen and talked to a great +number of them, and I can speak with certainty as to their feelings +and, I believe, with equal certainty as to the general feeling of +the country.</p> + +<p>The first and only obstacle that I see to a peaceable settlement +of the country is the present Khedive. It is absolutely impossible +he should remain, unless it is intended to occupy the country +permanently with our troops—and I doubt if even that would +altogether protect him. I have asked people of every class about +him and I have not found one that did not despise him. The +Circassians and the rest of the fanatical class look upon him as a +traitor to his religion, and the liberals as a traitor to his +country. You know that till the bombardment I supported him with +the National party as against Halim or Ismaïl or other pretenders, +but I am certain that no reconciliation is possible. You do not +believe in his culpability in the matter of the riots of June, but +all the Egyptians here do, and within the last three days I have +had very important evidence on that head offered me. Now, I don’t +wish to make too much of this—it was a stroke of party +politics.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_577">[577]</span> But what +the Nationalists will never forgive is that he has had innocent men +as well as men who acted at his instigation hanged for these very +acts. I have now the evidence of two men of the highest +respectability, one of whom is Ahmed Bey Minshawi, the Sheykh who +is so honourably mentioned in the Blue Books as having saved the +lives of several hundred Christians at Tantah, to the effect that +the riots there were equally the work of the Khedive’s friends, and +that Yusuf Abu Diab, who was hanged for the affair, was not only +innocent but did his best to save lives. Innocent men have +everywhere been arrested and imprisoned on charges connected with +these things to gratify the spite of the Khedive and his few +partisans. You will say perhaps that these tales are not true, but +they are certainly believed in—and in the belief lies all the +difficulty of reconciliation. For myself I believe so strongly in +the Khedive’s treachery that I would certainly not advise Arabi to +return to Egypt, were the option given him, under Tewfik’s +rule.</p> + +<p>The Circassians of course do not quarrel with him on this +account (for they look on the fellahin as their proper scapegoats), +but for his conduct during the war and his feebleness of character. +As you know, they are very few in numbers in the country, only a +few thousand, and they say they want a <em>man</em> not a woman to +protect them against Europe and against another rising of the +fellahin. I believe there is a strong party among them for Ismaïl +Pasha, a few for Husseyn on account of his extreme bigotry, and a +few for Hassan, his brother. Among the more liberal-minded Halim is +a favourite, as he is among many of the Egyptians through Abu +Nadara’s advocacy, though very few people know him. His enemies say +he is not a politician and cares only for cats and birds. Nobody +will hear at all of Ibrahim on account of his letter to the Duke of +Cambridge. The Khedive of course has a party, though he has no +friends. This consists first of the Ministers who have come into +power through his restoration—though all these cannot be counted +on—secondly of Butros Pasha and other rich Copts, and I believe the +Coptic money-lenders of the Said. The Patriarch and the mass of the +Coptic clergy belong to the “Hesbu el Horiye,” the party of +liberty, which now occupies the place of the National party of two +years ago. Also, thirdly, of the financiers, bankers, and rich +Syrian and Greek merchants of Alexandria. It is, however, safe to +say that there is nobody of the Khedive’s party, except the +Ministers, who do not support him as a natural stepping-stone to +annexation.</p> + +<p>The fellahin of the Delta, as far as I can gather, are divided +in opinion, those of the remoter districts caring nothing for +politics, and having still a traditional respect for +Effendina—whoever he may<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_578">[578]</span> be—the other part believing that Arabi will +return. Of this there has grown up within the last few months a +very strong belief in Cairo and the towns—and there is no doubt in +the world that he is popular in spite of his misfortunes. I have +heard people complain of him for his conduct in the war, for his +neglect of blocking the Suez Canal, for his praying when he ought +to have been fighting, and for his running away at Tel-el-Kebir. +But they talk kindly of him and are proud of him as the first +<em>fellah</em> who ever held supreme power in Egypt, and I had +abundant proofs of their goodwill to myself as his friend. Except +the Khedive I see no obstacle to his recall. Sherif might, I +believe, work with him again as far as the Nationalists are +concerned, and Ismaïl Eyoub certainly could. But Ali Mubarak Pasha, +Khairi Pasha, Omar Lutfi Pasha, and Osman Ghaleb, the Prefect of +Police, and Sultan Pasha would have to retire from power. I cannot +conceive their being any loss—and there are certain Mudirs, too, in +the provinces, who have been exceptionally bloodthirsty and +tyrannical, whose position would be incompatible with a return of +the liberal party to office. I am of opinion that the only prince +of the family of Mehemet Ali who could unite parties is Halim. But +I think you would do far better to make Arabi himself the chief of +the state—Halim after all is a Turk and the people only look to him +as the alternative to the present regime.</p> + +<p>The more I have seen of the people the more convinced I have +become that the present reign of terror cannot continue. If you +withdraw the troops without establishing something and somebody +that the people like, you must have trouble. The army may be as +fond of Sir Evelyn Wood as he is said to think, but that will not +prevent them owning the first resolute man who proposes to dethrone +the Khedive—he is too unpopular with the people to be popular with +the army—and, if the Nationalists are too crushed to turn on him +yet awhile, the Circassians certainly will. You will then find +yourselves with some really unscrupulous adventurer at the head of +a revolution, and you or your successors will annex the country. I +am writing in the belief that you do not intend or wish for such a +result, but to persist in thrusting Tewfik on the Egyptians is to +invite annexation.</p> + +<p>I had intended to write this to the “Times,” but I write it +instead to you, hoping that you may show it to Mr. Gladstone. I +would rather you did not show it to the F. O., for they would only +use it to my friends’ disadvantage. The whole thing depends now on +Mr. Gladstone. If he insists on restoring liberty to Egypt nothing +is easier—but not on the present lines.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch9">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_579">[579]</span><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">Haddo House, Aberdeen,</p> + +<p class="right"><em>21st October</em>, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Your two interesting letters written from Egypt, for which many +thanks, have both reached me while I am holiday making in Scotland; +but I have taken steps to secure their being seen by Mr. Gladstone. +Your account of affairs in Egypt is, to say the least of it, +depressing. I won’t make any comments on what you say. I will +content myself with being the receptacle of bad news and the +conduit pipe of it to headquarters. I will only say that I can’t +conceive how it would be possible, without the grossest breach of +faith, for the English Government to countenance the ousting of +Tewfik, whatever sort of fellow he may be.</p> + +<p>Holiday making is neither conducive to letter writing, I find, +nor to the catering of news, so I am afraid I shall, as far as +being a correspondent is concerned, make a poor return for your +budgets. Good luck to you and a pleasant trip to India.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch6">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Sir Evelyn Baring to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Cairo, <em>December</em> 31, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>I have received a letter from Chérif Pasha informing me that the +Egyptian Government intends to forbid your disembarkation in Egypt +on your return journey from India—His Excellency adds: “Par +courtoisie, et en vue d’empêcher tout incident facheux de se +produire dans le cas où il entrerait dans les intentions de +Monsieur Blunt de s’arrêter en Egypte, à son retour des Indes, je +crois devoir vous demander Monsieur le Ministre, de vouloir bien +informer d’avance votre compatriote de cette interdiction.”</p> + +<p>In compliance, therefore, with the request of the Egyptian +Government, I beg to communicate their decision to you.</p> + +<p>I am, Sir, your most obedient humble servant,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">E. <span class="sc">Baring</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Sir Evelyn +Baring</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Delhi, <em>January</em> 26, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir Evelyn</span>,</p> + +<p>I have to acknowledge the receipt, under flying seal from Mr. +Primrose, of your letter of the 31st December, which reached +me<span class="pagenum" id="Page_580">[580]</span> yesterday. I +confess that the contents surprised me, not merely on account of +the nature of the message your letter contained for me from the +Khedive’s late Prime Minister, but still more from the fact that +you should have transmitted it in an official form without comment, +explanation, or expression of disapproval.</p> + +<p>That the Government of which Sherif Pasha was the head should +have disliked my presence in Egypt I can well understand, for I +have been more than once, as you know, instrumental in bringing +their abuse of power to official ears; but I am ignorant of having +offended against any law which should authorize my exclusion, as +the subject of a friendly Power, from Egypt; and still less am I +conscious of having done what should forfeit me my right to your +diplomatic protection. Indeed, the circumstances of my recent visit +to Egypt would seem to entitle me to this last in an especial +manner; for you will not have forgotten that I came there last +September with special recommendation to you from the highest +official quarter, and that my renewed interest in Egyptian politics +was authorized by suggestions emanating from the same high source. +But for this, I believe I may say with truth that I should not have +stopped in Egypt at all on my way eastwards, and most certainly +that I should not have encouraged hopes there which the sequel +might fail to justify.</p> + +<p>With equal truth I can assure you that, had you informed me in a +less formal manner that the interests of Egypt would be best served +by my not returning to Cairo this spring, I would have willingly +consented inasmuch as at the moment of my receiving your letter I +had all but abandoned my intention of so doing, partly on account +of quarantine difficulties, partly because I recognized in Nubar +Pasha’s accession to office an adjournment by our Government of the +special hopes which interested me.</p> + +<p>Now, however, in face of your official communication, I feel +myself obliged to do something towards asserting the right, which +is mine as a British subject, of residing where I will abroad under +British protection, and especially, because I hold property there, +in Egypt. Nubar Pasha is an enlightened man, with whom I have the +pleasure of being personally acquainted, and he is not likely of +his own motion to renew his predecessor’s threat of excluding me +from the country, but I fear I must ask you, as I do most formally +ask you, to be good enough to give me your written assurance either +that the prohibition forwarded by you has ended with Sherif Pasha’s +dismissal, or that you are prepared, should I be so disposed as to +wish to land in Egypt, to take all necessary measures to protect me +from annoyance. Less than this would be equivalent to my abandoning +a right which, as a matter of principle as well as of convenience, +I am not prepared to forego.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_581">[581]</span>I will only add +that letters from you in this sense will reach me, if addressed to +the Rubattino Steamer “China,” at Aden on the 8th of March or at +Suez on the 12th, and will prevent further misunderstanding.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch7">I am, my dear Sir Evelyn, yours +faithfully,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Bombay, <em>January</em> 30, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Eddy</span>,</p> + +<p>What, in the name of all that is blunder-headed, does Baring +mean by sending me <em>in official form</em> and without +explanation a threat of the late Sherif Pasha’s that he would +prevent my landing in Egypt? You surely explained to him the +meaning of my last visit and the encouragement which had been given +me (I don’t mean merely through yourself) to make a move in +Egyptian politics. Or what is the history of it? Of course I have +been obliged to answer, but as yet have done so semi-officially +only, and without putting all the dots upon the I’s, and have left +him a door of retreat from what you must see is quite a false +position. Please don’t let him force me to go any further.</p> + +<p>Seriously, would it not be better to work with me frankly at +last by telling me exactly what it is you want in Egypt. Unless you +really mean annexation, you will need every honest man’s help to +get you out of your difficulties, and the day will come when you +will not despise mine. It is only two years ago if I remember +rightly that you told me Gordon was mad. But you must not drive me +too far. I have a serious work to do in the East, a work of which +the establishment of good government in Egypt is only a small part, +and one way or other, with God’s help, I mean to do it. It is a +good work and you could further it greatly in Downing Street if you +chose to trust me, but I am sure you cannot hinder it, certainly +not by shutting me out of Egypt. I had nearly given up the idea of +going back there this spring, for my thoughts were in another +direction, when I got Baring’s letter. But I shall most certainly +fight the matter out if he insists. Only I beg of you think it +carefully over and if possible let Baring be advised to send me a +sensible reply.</p> + +<p>We leave Bombay on the 1st of March.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch9">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_582">[582]</span><span class="sc">Sir Evelyn Baring to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Cairo, <em>Feb.</em> 26, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Mr. Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>On receipt of your letter of January 26th I placed myself in +communication with Nubar Pasha. I enclose for your information a +copy of my letter and of Nubar Pasha’s reply.</p> + +<p>You will observe that Nubar Pasha’s views are identical with +those entertained by Cherif Pasha.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch8">Very truly yours,</p> + +<p class="right">E. <span class="sc">Baring</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, 28 <em>Feb.</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Thanks for writing to me. I know nothing whatever of the steps +which the Egyptian Government have taken with regard to yourself; +and I am certainly not aware that they were taken at the instance +of the English Government or of its representative at Cairo.</p> + +<p>I am afraid—and my fears are confirmed by what you say in your +last letter—that you have considered the fact of your corresponding +with the Prime Minister’s Private Secretary on Egyptian matters as +an encouragement, however intentionally guarded the correspondence +may have been on my side. This may lead to misunderstanding; and I +feel bound to consider not so much myself (for that matters little) +as my master. Moreover it is difficult for me in writing to show +exactly how far I write on my own account—a difficulty which is +enhanced by the impossibility of my devoting the time and care +necessary for corresponding on important subjects.</p> + +<p>Having regard then to these considerations I think it my duty +not to attempt to write about such subjects, and that it will be +better for you and me if we drop writing to one another on public +questions. I daresay I am to blame in this matter, as it has always +been an interest and pleasure to me to hear your views which you +have the power of expressing so well, and I have been tempted to +egg you on. I hope you will not misunderstand what I have said. I +don’t think I need have any fear on this account, for I am sure our +friendship is strong enough not to be affected by anything I may do +from a sense of public and official duty. I have been awfully busy +of late, busier than ever. Whenever not wholly absorbed in work, my +thoughts have of late been mainly occupied by the long and very +serious illness of poor Pembroke. . . . I wish I had time to send +more news; but that is not possible.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_583">[583]</span>For the sake of +your friends, if not for your own sake, I hope you won’t act in the +matter of the order of the Egyptian Government in such a way as to +bring yourself into trouble. I hope I have said nothing which will +annoy you, and you will make due allowance for the difficulties and +delicacy of my position.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch6">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>April</em> 4, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Welcome back. I am truly glad to hear of your and Lady Anne’s +safe return. I shall like of all things to arrange an early +meeting, etc. Thanks for taking my remarks in such good grace.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch7">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to the Right Hon. W. +E. Gladstone</span>, M.P.</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Crabbet Park, <em>April</em> 23, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>A few days ago some gentlemen of the many interested in the fate +of General Gordon called on me to ask my advice as to the best +means of extricating him from the imminent peril in which he lies, +and they suggested the formation of a band of volunteers which +should endeavour to run the gauntlet of their besiegers and having +forced their way to Khartoum should bring him back with them in +safety by the same road. The idea seemed to me a generous but +wholly impracticable one, and I told them so, frankly adding that +much as I should wish to join in any reasonable attempt to save +General Gordon’s life, I could not with the principles I hold, be a +party to an armed attempt against the Arabs whom I hold to be in +the right as I hold General Gordon to be in the wrong. I promised +however that should anything in the shape of peaceful negotiation +be proposed I would willingly aid them to the full extent of my +power.</p> + +<p>Since then I have most opportunely received information which +leads me to feel certain that if properly approached not only could +terms be obtained from the besiegers of Khartoum which should +include General Gordon’s safe return with such of his companions as +might choose to accompany him, but that a general pacification of +the Upper Nile might at the same time and by the same means be +effected. In view therefore of the urgency of the situation (for +believe me, Sir, it is urgent), I deem it a duty to offer +through<span class="pagenum" id="Page_584">[584]</span> you my +services to H. M.’s Government as mediator in this matter. I say to +H. M. Government, because it is clear that no merely private +negotiations could be effectual in a case where such large public +interests are involved. But I do not apprehend that any absolute +departure from the general principles of policy announced by the +Government would be required in conducting them to a successful +termination.</p> + +<p>With regard to my own part in the matter I will only add that, +although I believe it would not be necessary for me to go myself to +the Soudan, I should be ready to do so if the circumstances of the +case should absolutely require it.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch9">I am, my dear Sir, yours +faithfully,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, Whitehall.</p> + +<p class="right pad-rightch7"><em>24th April</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Mr. Gladstone is obliged for your letter. He must to-day confine +himself to saying that he is communicating its contents to his +colleagues in the Cabinet.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="center">Yours,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Same date.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>I add a private line. Considering all that has gone before, I +can’t help thinking you would do well to approach the Government by +other means than those in Downing Street. Could you not take Harry +Brand into confidence with a view to your viewings sifting through +him to Lord Hartington?</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch20">Yours aff.</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. H.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. Hamilton</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, James Street, Buckingham Gate,</p> + +<p class="right pad-rightch3"><em>April</em> 24, 1884. 7 o’clock +p.m.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Eddy</span>,</p> + +<p>If it was a matter concerning my own wishes or one of small +importance I would willingly consult Harry Brand, who would do all +he could I know to serve me. But this is the most serious step I +have taken in my life and one which involves consequences not to me +only but to this country and to many besides, and I +dare<span class="pagenum" id="Page_585">[585]</span> not treat it +except with those wholly responsible. If Mr. Gladstone cannot see +me now, perhaps he may be willing to do so later. I was in the +House this afternoon and listened attentively to his declarations, +and I gathered from them that he has not yet closed the door to +negotiations by any absolute decision of an immediately warlike +nature. So that I will wait his time, confident that if I can be of +use he will not scruple, on a point of formality in connection with +past events, to give me timely notice. Only I fear that perhaps the +time given us all may be shorter than he thinks, for already +according to my latest advices the tribes are gathering from every +side in arms, and though I still think it not too late it may well +be so soon. I shall be in London till Saturday when I go back to +Crabbet but shall be always within reach if required.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch11">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Horace Seymour to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, 30 <em>April</em> 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>Mr. Gladstone desires me to thank you for your offer to act as +mediator in the Soudan, of which, however, Her Majesty’s Government +are not able to make use, inasmuch as it must already be known +throughout that region that they, in common with the Government of +Egypt, have no other desire than to promote the evacuation of the +country and the restoration of its liberties.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">Believe me, yours truly,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Horace Seymour</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Sir Philip Currie to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Foreign Office, <em>May</em> 17, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>I am directed by Earl Granville to acknowledge the receipt of +your letter of the 1st instant in which you complain of the refusal +of the Egyptian Government to allow you to land in Egypt on your +return from India, which refusal was communicated to you through +Her Majesty’s Agent and Consul-General at Cairo.</p> + +<p>I am to inform you that the decision not to permit you to visit +Egypt is one with which Her Majesty’s Government are not prepared +to interfere.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">I am, Sir, your most obedient humble +servant,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Philip W. Currie</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_586">[586]</span><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>21st May</em> 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Rumours have reached me that you are about to found your +complaint against the Government for being excluded from Egypt +partly on the ground of certain “interviews” which you had with me +last autumn.</p> + +<p>I feel bound to notice these rumours by writing you a line; but +I may say at the outset, knowing you as I do, that I wholly and +entirely discredit them for more than one reason.</p> + +<p>In the first place, I unfortunately saw so little of you before +you left England that I know we had no “interviews” with the +solitary exception of your coming to say good-bye to me, when I +recollect that our conversation was limited to wishing you “bon +voyage,” adding as I believe I did that letters from you abroad +would continue to interest me as they always had.</p> + +<p>In the second place, I studiously avoid ever attempting to quote +Mr. Gladstone’s views—(and his views alone have weight)—which I +have no title whatever to represent.</p> + +<p>In the third place, had I committed any indiscretions—as to +which my conscience is absolutely clear—any use of them by yourself +could only have one result; and that would be, to show that I was +quite unfit for my present post of confidence. Of doing this I am +sure you have not the smallest intention.</p> + +<p>You will I know excuse my bothering you on this matter. All that +I want is the shortest authority from yourself to deny the truth of +the rumours. For this purpose only do I ask for such an assurance, +and not for my own satisfaction, because I am convinced that you +would be the last person in the world to take at a disadvantage one +of your oldest and sincerest friends, who occupies a place of great +trust and delicacy.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p class="space-above15">I hope if fortune favours me to see you +again soon.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. Hamilton</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Crabbet Park, <em>May</em> 22 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Eddy</span>,</p> + +<p>I have no wish to make a scandal of this or any other matter, +unless absolutely forced into it, and still less to do you an +injury; and so I have decided, before going further, to lay the +whole facts privately before Mr. Gladstone. He will then be able to +decide<span class="pagenum" id="Page_587">[587]</span> whether I +have or have not cause to complain. You may rely upon me to be +scrupulous in not exaggerating anything that passed between us, but +I have a memorandum of the circumstances written at the time, +imperfect indeed but sufficient to prove to me, if I had any doubt +of the accuracy of my recollection, that our conversation in +Downing Street the day I saw you there before I went abroad was by +no means limited, as you suppose, to “wishing me bon voyage.” I do +not however rely wholly upon this for what I have all along +asserted, namely that I was encouraged to stop in Egypt on my way +Eastwards. Unless I was altogether deceived by another person, whom +you probably know, Mr. Gladstone was at that time desirous of a +reasonable excuse for restoring the Exiled Nationalists, and I went +to Egypt and called on Baring distinctly under this impression. You +will say that I have been the subject of a mystification, but I +find this very difficult to believe, and at any rate the doubt +should be cleared up. I repeat, I have no wish to have it done in +public, if I can have it done in private. I do not wish to make a +scandal. I look upon Mr. Gladstone as in reality a friend to most +of my ideas, and I would far rather not be driven into a position +of antagonism to him. But the withdrawal of my right of protection +in Egypt is a violent proceeding and one that I cannot accept +without protest. The notice was served on me formally, publicly and +I may say brutally, and Lord Granville has refused me even a +reason. This is not fair, and my only resource is to force an +answer through Parliament, when the whole matter will be sifted. I +have fortunately made it a rule to have no political secrets as +regards my own acts, and so am prepared to argue it out. But I +quite understand that others are not in my free position; and, if +you can assure me that Mr. Gladstone will give the matter his +serious private attention and not merely put me off with an +official reply I will write to him on the subject. With regard to +my really going to Egypt I have no wish in the present position of +affairs to do so. I could do no good there politically nor could I +even if I wished it make matters worse; and I am far from well and +want rest and not a new campaign. But my right to protection is a +matter of principle and I have certain real, if not very large, +material interests in Egypt which I may at any time require to see +to. Indeed Baring’s action in withdrawing his protection and +preventing my landing has already cost me perhaps a couple of +hundred pounds. This is exactly how things stand, and I await your +answer, before taking further steps.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch15">Yours ever,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_588">[588]</span><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>24th May</em> 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Thanks for your letter.</p> + +<p>I am very sorry that your recollection of what took place last +autumn should be so entirely at variance with my own recollection +of it. But I cannot conceive that any private conversation between +friends, whatever complexion you may put upon it, can be construed +into what you call “a scandal”; and I recognize the kindness of +your desire not to cause me bother.</p> + +<p>Mr. Gladstone never fails to give his personal attention to +every communication made to him; so I need hardly assure you that a +statement coming from you will be fully considered by him.</p> + +<p>I am very sorry to be the cause of adding at all to your +labours, etc.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">Yours as always,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. H.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to the Right Hon. W. +E. Gladstone</span>, M.P.</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Crabbet Park, <em>May</em> 31, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>The privilege you have, at various times during the last three +years, accorded me of addressing you on public matters must be my +excuse if I now appeal to you on a matter mainly personal, namely +my recent exclusion from Egypt on my return from India, and the +still more recent refusal of H. M.’s Government to afford me +protection there invariably given to British subjects. The +circumstances of my case are briefly as follows:</p> + +<p>Towards the close of last session I received a visit from a +gentleman well known to yourself but not otherwise connected with +political life or at all with Egypt, during which he urged upon me +the desirability of my “making a new move” in Egyptian politics. +His idea was that public opinion in England had sufficiently +changed during the previous twelve months for it to be possible to +propose with some chance of success a restoration of the National +party before the British troops were withdrawn from Egypt; and he +furthermore suggested that the matter might best be brought forward +if a popular demonstration should occur on the occasion of the +Elections under Lord Dufferin’s Charter. He thought that the +leaders of the liberal party if such there still were at Cairo +might be advised to propose Arabi as their Candidate and, if his +election were secured, that there would afterwards be no difficulty +in bringing about his recall from exile. The idea was a<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_589">[589]</span> new one to me, and I confess +that at first it seemed to me a quite impracticable one; and I did +not encourage it, especially as at the time I had abandoned all +immediate thoughts of again taking an active part in Egyptian +politics. It seemed to me that, without the concurrence of H. M.’s +Government, it would only result in failure, and I knew how little +real liberty of choice the Electors would have and how certain +would be the punishment imposed upon the leaders in any such +movement. I nevertheless on this suggestion wrote to an intelligent +friend at Cairo, on whom I believed I could rely, to inform me what +chance of success the plan would offer, and I received his answer +towards the end of August. He informed me that “though there was no +<em>party</em> in favour of Arabi’s return, it was because it was +not thought of as possible. Many regretted him, but the punishment +inflicted on him and the spite wreaked on all who were mixed up +with his revolution, which continued daily to be exercised, +prevented any one from attempting to follow his example. There was +a big party which thought of him with regret, but until quite +lately my correspondent had hardly heard a word about his return at +Cairo. Lord Dufferin’s parliament had always been a mere toy and a +thing to laugh at by all who knew Egypt. With the existing system +of Palace and Ministerial supremacy, where no man dared do right +because he instantly made himself a marked man, the Parliament +would be a convenient tool for the Government. The bare idea of its +showing independence under the existing regime would be ridiculous. +At the same time if Arabi returned to Egypt, any constituency would +return him, unless pressure were put on the Electors. If the +elections were left alone, pressure would certainly be put on any +constituency for which Arabi might present himself as Candidate. +But, if Englishmen watched the ballot, he might get returned, +although that constituency would most certainly be made to suffer +in a hundred ways for its temerity. . . . If the people thought +that a new era was dawning and they might vote fearlessly, of +course Arabi would be returned by any constituency in Egypt, but +they had had a severe lesson and ‘a burnt child dreads the +fire.’”</p> + +<p>This letter, dated the 20th of August 1883, reached me if I am +not mistaken on the 29th; and on the same day, I again called, by +his invitation, on the gentleman already referred to, and he then +told me that since his last talk with me he had seen you and that +he could now assure me that it was your personal wish to find an +excuse for restoring the exiles, and he advised me strongly to go +to Cairo, where I should be well received by Sir Evelyn Baring and +where I could talk the matter over with him. “Sir Evelyn Baring,” +he said, “will arrive in a few days at Cairo and he had <em>carte +blanche</em> to begin a new policy in place of Sir Edward +Malet’s<span class="pagenum" id="Page_590">[590]</span> which had +failed.” This put the matter in a more hopeful light, and I at once +determined to stop in Egypt on my way to India, and, if I found Sir +Evelyn Baring in reality favourable to the idea, to propose Arabi’s +Election to the Liberals of Cairo. Although I will not say that the +communication was delivered to me in terms as a message from you, I +certainly accepted it as in some sort such, and I find it difficult +to believe that it was wholly unauthorised by you or at least that +you were unaware that it would be made. Nor can I doubt that a +restoration of the National Party was a most natural and wise +resolve, for it was only by such a course that the promised +evacuation of Egypt could with any prudence have been effected, or +the Charter of Egyptian liberty been made a reality.</p> + +<p>I therefore began to prepare my plans of action, as well as it +was possible to do so beforehand, and arranged to leave England on +the 12th of September, for Suez, whence I could visit Cairo and +learn how matters really lay and whether my stay there could with +any advantage be prolonged.</p> + +<p>Moreover on the day of my departure I received a note from Mr. +Hamilton, your private secretary, asking to see me before I left, +and I went to call on him in Downing Street and talked the matter +of my visit to Egypt over with him. I told him of my plan with +regard to the Cairo Elections, and he approved of it or seemed to +approve, and assured me of Sir Evelyn Baring’s readiness to confer +with me, and we discussed certain details regarding my visit and he +gave me advice on other political matters. Although Mr. Hamilton +and I are old friends, I had not seen him for some time previously +to this visit and we did not talk, as far as I am aware, at all on +private matters; nor had I been to Downing Street for nearly a +year, and, notwithstanding his reserve which I noticed as to +yourself, I remained distinctly under the impression that his +language on the occasion was authorised by you. You had left +England some days before for Norway; and Mr. Hamilton, if anyone, +was there to represent you. Thus I was and still am convinced that +my journey was made with your sanction, and that on that account I +had special claims on Sir Evelyn Baring for his protection in case +my visit should give rise to annoyance.</p> + +<p>As a matter of fact I only stayed ten days in Egypt, and meddled +in no way at Cairo with the Elections. I found them half over when +I arrived; and on calling on Sir Evelyn Baring found him with quite +other views from what I had been led to expect. He received me +indeed most amiably and discussed with me the whole situation; but +when I talked of a Nationalist restoration we no longer agreed. I +spoke my mind perhaps rather<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_591">[591]</span> too freely to him about his policy which I +felt certain must end, as it has ended, in failure; but I have +nothing else to reproach myself with in my communications with him, +and beyond giving some advice and a very qualified encouragement to +the friends and relations of the Exiles as to their eventual return +and ascertaining some valuable facts with regard to the history of +the previous two years, I did little while there that had a +political significance. It was therefore with real surprise that I +received Sir Evelyn’s notice delivered officially and without +explanation excuse or remark four months later that I was not to +disembark in Egypt on my return from India.</p> + +<p>This, Sir, is the principal point in the case which I would lay +before you. A second is that the decision to exclude me from Egypt +seems to have been come to simultaneously with a determination to +inflict certain petty annoyances on me in regard to a small +property I have in Egypt, annoyances which, reckoned only in money +value, will represent a loss to me of perhaps a couple of hundred +pounds. It is equally difficult to understand that these should +have been entered on with or without Sir Evelyn Baring’s knowledge, +<em>with</em>, because they are an act unworthy of a public servant +towards a political opponent, <em>without</em>, because they +occurred precisely at the extreme plenitude of Sir Evelyn’s power, +when hardly a sparrow fell to the ground in Egypt without his +knowledge.</p> + +<p>A third point is the refusal of the F.O. to <em>assign me any +reason</em> for declining to support my demand of admission as a +British Subject into Egypt. Although I am advised that the Egyptian +Government has a technical right to refuse entrance into Egypt, as +far as I have been able to ascertain, it is a right which has never +before been enforced there against a British Subject; and the +British Government have never before refused protection <em>without +assigning reason</em>. It seems to me therefore that it is a public +duty with me not to let this pass without protest, for if it be +admitted in my case that it depends upon the arbitrary goodwill and +pleasure of the Foreign Minister of the day to decide who among +British Subjects shall and shall not be protected abroad, it surely +establishes a dangerous precedent, limiting criticism on foreign +affairs to agreement with the Government. I have ventured to +disagree with Lord Granville on his policy in Egypt. <em>Without +assigning reason</em> he excludes me from Egypt, the inference +seems clear that I am subjected to pains and penalties for my free +speaking, a thing altogether out of accordance with English +political practice. Nor can I think that the immediate convenience +of excluding me from Egypt, which I presume is the unavowed motive, +can be worth so very new and questionable a departure.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_592">[592]</span>Under all these +circumstances I am induced to believe that by a personal appeal to +you I shall be best consulting the general interests as well as my +own. I have been advised that my remedy lies with Parliament and +the publicity which should oblige the Foreign Office to give me a +fair answer; but I have no wish, in the presence of such large +public questions as are at the present moment being debated with +regard to Egypt, to bring a personal grievance of my own in +connection with that country unnecessarily before the public; and I +feel sure that you will admit the soundness of my reasoning, and +will so far favour me as to place before Lord Granville my +unofficial request that he will reconsider his decision with regard +to my recent application.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch7">I am, my dear Sir, yours very +faithfully,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p class="space-above15">P.S.—I may add that should you feel any +doubt as to the accuracy of my recollection of the two +conversations here recorded, I possess reasonable proof of it in +the shape of memorandums written at the time. These I should be +happy if you required them to show you privately.</p> + +<p>[N.B.—Sir Evelyn Baring subsequently, 1891, assured me that the +annoyances complained of in this letter in regard to my property +were none of his instigation, and I accepted and accept his +assurance implicitly.</p> + +<p>My correspondent in Egypt quoted in the letter was Mr. Ardern +Beaman, late official interpreter to the British Agency, and one +well qualified to give the opinion quoted. The friend of Mr. +Gladstone referred to was of course Sir James Knowles.]</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. Hamilton</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">St. James’ Club, Piccadilly, W., <em>May</em> 31, +1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Eddy</span>,</p> + +<p>I send you my letter to Mr. Gladstone, which I have very +carefully drawn up, so as to be within the limit of things which I +am quite sure of, and which I could, if necessary, support by +reasonable evidence. With regard especially to my conversation with +you, I have kept myself well within the limit of things written. I +am convinced that the little I quote will remind you of much more +that was said. As to the main fact of Mr. Gladstone’s having last +year the thought of restoring the Nationalist party and of allowing +it to be helped through my instrumentality, the more I think it +over the less I doubt it. Please then forward my letter to him +without delay, and let me have his answer before +Parliament<span class="pagenum" id="Page_593">[593]</span> meets +again so that I may lose no further time, which in the present +critical position of affairs is becoming valuable. I am sure you +cannot say that I have shewn impatience.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch8">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Horace Seymour to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, 10 <em>June</em> 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>Mr. Gladstone has received and considered your letter of the +31st ult., and he desires me to say in reply that it is, in his +opinion, impossible that any friend of his could, without the +grossest error of judgment, have given you any ground for the +suppositions that he was favourable (<em>a</em>) to the restoration +of the exiles to Egypt, and the election of Arabi under Lord +Dufferin’s scheme; or (<em>b</em>) to your stopping in Egypt on +your way to India for the purpose of promoting Arabi’s +candidature.</p> + +<p>With regard to your account of your interview with Hamilton on +the day you started for Egypt, Mr. Gladstone is convinced that you +entirely mistook Hamilton.</p> + +<p>Without, however, questioning in any way your intentions or your +honour, Mr. Gladstone has deplored your proceedings in Egypt as +alike injurious to Egyptian and British interests, and he has +entirely concurred in the course which has been taken by the +Foreign Office in reference to yourself.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch7">I am, yours truly,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Horace Seymour</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. Seymour</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">James Street, <em>June</em> 11, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Seymour</span>,</p> + +<p>I beg you to thank Mr. Gladstone for me for the courteous form +of his answer to my letter, and to say that I do not propose +bringing the matter of my exclusion from Egypt before Parliament +until after the present crisis.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch15">Yours truly,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, 5 <em>Aug.</em> 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Thanks for your friendly note. I did not, however, need to be +assured that, so far as you were yourself concerned, any +allusion<span class="pagenum" id="Page_594">[594]</span> to our +conversation last September had no unfriendly intent towards me. I +am only sorry that our memories should not be more in accord; but I +can honestly say two things. One that my asking you to come and say +good-bye was merely the impulse of a friend who values the +friendship of another. The other, that I have no recollection +whatever of any announcement of your intentions in Egypt, and that +the strictly private nature of our goodbye meeting is confirmed by +my own diary, and by my not having reported any part of it to Mr. +Gladstone.</p> + +<p>If I was incautious, I shall try to amend my ways in future.</p> + +<p>I am going off to Scotland almost immediately; and whatever your +movements may be, pray be assured that they will always carry with +them the best wishes of</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to the Right Hon. W. +E. Gladstone</span>, M.P.</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Crabbet, <em>Novr.</em> 18, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>I venture once again to address you on a matter of very large +importance connected with past events in Egypt, and which is still +exercising a powerful influence for evil on the prospects of +Government in that country and our own good name throughout the +East.</p> + +<p>You will not have forgotten the charges brought by Lord Randolph +Churchill last year against the Khedive of complicity in organizing +the riots of Alexandria, or the opinion which I have more than once +expressed that they were well founded. My original knowledge of the +matter came through my connection with Arabi’s trial, and when I +found that in spite of the promised amnesty men were still being +tried and executed on accusations connected with that affair I did +not hesitate to put in Lord Randolph’s hands the few facts then at +my command. At the same time I took no leading part myself in +bringing the matter before the public. Since that time, however, a +variety of accidents have put me into possession of a complete +chain of new evidence, giving me the right to speak at last with +absolute certainty on all the great events of that time. I am able +now not only to trace the history of the Alexandrian riots with a +sure hand, but to produce full evidence of the Khedive’s orders +having been given for the riots of Tantah, Dumanhour, and other +towns of the Delta a month later. Moreover (and this I consider the +most important feature of the case) I have ascertained and am +prepared to prove that there was a total miscarriage of justice +under the Commission<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_595">[595]</span> instituted to try cases connected with +these massacres after the war. The chief offenders were not +punished; in many instances innocent men were put forward by the +Khedive’s officers to suffer for the guilty; and in others those +condemned were not only innocent, but had taken an active part in +saving Christian life. In the case of Lord Randolph Churchill’s +indictment, the written statements it was objected were unsigned. +But the witnesses I can now bring forward are men of acknowledged +character, and much of their evidence was officially acquired, +while they are ready to appear in person either publicly or in +private in support of their assertions.</p> + +<p>Such being the case I feel that I cannot do better than lay the +facts privately before you, and request that you will personally +examine the value of my new evidence. I have as yet communicated it +to none of my political friends; and I can assure you that I had +far rather keep it remote from public dispute. It is a question of +justice to be done and reparation made; for there are innocent men +still in prison, and the families of others who have suffered death +are in distress; and it is you alone who can adequately repair the +wrong or restore the honour of English justice where it has been +compromised.</p> + +<p>At the same time I am aware of the many calls upon your time, +and should you consent to an inquiry I should be satisfied if you +would allow yourself to be represented by deputy in all the +details, begging you only to retain the responsibility in your own +hands, and not to refer me to the Foreign Office, which has been +throughout deaf to my representations, also as it is a question of +evidence and witnesses I would suggest that persons of judicial +training would best discharge the duty of representing you in an +inquiry. I should ask no better than that the case should be +referred for decision to ordinary English judges.</p> + +<p>Having said this, I need hardly add that I am myself absolutely +certain of all the main facts of which I propose to produce +evidence, as certain as I am of any in history; nor need I assure +you that I have a perfect confidence that when you too shall have +been convinced of the deceptions practised upon our agents in +Egypt, you will hasten to do justice. It is not too much to affirm +that this initial failure of justice after the war has been the +cause of all subsequent failures, and that there is little prospect +of renewing honest life in Egypt through our intervention as long +as so great and notorious a treachery remains unpunished.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch3">I am, my dear sir, yours very +faithfully,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_596">[596]</span><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>21st Nov.</em> 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Your note was most welcome as it gave me tidings of your +whereabouts, as to which in spite of many inquiries of friends I +could ascertain nothing. I send this half line in anticipation of +any reply Mr. Gladstone may send you when he has been able to read +your letter—which was not feasible for him to do to-day.</p> + +<p>You don’t say where you have been betaking yourself; but I hope +we may soon meet.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch3">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. H.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Horace Seymour to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, 25 <em>November</em>, +1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>Mr. Gladstone desires me to say in reply to your letter of the +18th of this month, that under your inhibition to communicate with +the Foreign Office, he cannot do more than acknowledge its +receipt.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="center">Yours faithfully,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Horace Seymour</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. +Gladstone</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Précis.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">London, <em>March</em> 12, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p>A letter saying that since the fall of Khartoum he has put +himself once more in correspondence with those in Europe who are in +correspondence with the Mahdi, with the result that he has +ascertained that the road to peaceful negotiation is open. He is +authorized by them to say that a preliminary discussion might be +opened in Egypt, but not through the ordinary diplomatic or +military channels—the basis of negotiation to be: 1. Release of +captives. 2. Immunity for the tribes involved in the war. 3. +Retirement of British or Egyptian forces to Wady Halfa and Souakin. +4. Evacuation of Souakin and Massowah in favour of the Sultan. 5. +Recognition of the Mahdi as sovereign within these limits. 6. +Establishment of diplomatic relations with England. 7. Freedom of +commercial intercourse. 8. Possibly a convention limiting the Slave +Trade. He is further authorized, in order to save further +bloodshed, to offer the services of an Arab gentleman to convey an +immediate message explaining the attitude of the English Government +towards the Soudan.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_597">[597]</span><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Confidential.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>March</em> 14, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Mr. Gladstone is obliged to you for your letter, which he wishes +me to acknowledge on his behalf.</p> + +<p>You imply that the Mahdi would not deal with Lord Wolseley and +Sir E. Baring, our accredited representatives in Egypt. But why +then does not the Mahdi send either some representative of his own +with his views ready to be presented to the Government here, or +some communication of those views, which might come to +head-quarters at once? One may almost say that anything short of +this is paltering with the case.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch9">Yours always,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. Hamilton</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Précis.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">London, <em>March</em> 16, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p>Explains the difficulty in the way of a representative being +sent, the road not being open and the Mahdi being unaware whether +his representative would be well received. Suggests sending an Arab +gentleman under a safe conduct to Khartoum. Will Mr. Gladstone be +disposed to facilitate the journey of such a gentleman, giving him +a sufficient knowledge of the disposition and ideas of the British +Government to enable him to arrange a formal embassy on the part of +the Mahdi?</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>March</em> 19, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Many thanks for your note. It did not occur to me to connect +Drummond Wolff’s Question with your letters. It is not my fault +that you have not had a further letter from me on the subject of +your last communication. All I can for the moment say is that it is +the subject of consideration. I am aware of what you consider the +urgency of the matter to be.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. H.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Confidential.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">21 <em>March</em>, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Your letter to me of the 16th has been taken into consideration. +I am to remind you that Lord Wolseley has been +instructed<span class="pagenum" id="Page_598">[598]</span> to +forward any overtures which may be made by the Mahdi, for the +immediate consideration of the Government. If it is thought that +the Mahdi is not aware of these instructions, it might possibly be +arranged that the Arab gentleman should convey the information +through the British lines. But the Government would require to be +satisfied as to the gentleman’s character and intentions.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch13">Yours always,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. +Gladstone</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Précis.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right"><em>March</em> 24, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p>Thanking for message received through Mr. Hamilton, which, +however, is not sufficiently definite to be acted on, but holds +himself in readiness to give any further explanations, and suggests +doing it by word of mouth.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Confidential.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>March</em> 28, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Mr. Gladstone cannot perceive that the last letter I wrote to +you by his direction was really indefinite. It practically conveyed +to you an intimation that, if the Government could be assured of +the Arab gentleman’s character and intentions, a passage through +the British lines might be arranged for him. Mr. Gladstone is +afraid that he cannot suggest any other mode of proceeding.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch13">Yours always,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>March</em> 28, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>I am sorry I cannot say more; but I must adhere to +instructions.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch10">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. H.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>March</em> 30, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Mr. Gladstone went out of town on Saturday night; and according +to present arrangements he will not return to London +before<span class="pagenum" id="Page_599">[599]</span> the 9th of +April. Under these circumstances I am afraid any interview is out +of all question.</p> + +<p>All I can do for the moment is to communicate on the subject of +your letter received this morning with Lord Hartington, who is not +only Mr. Gladstone’s locum tenens, but who is now more directly +concerned as War Minister than any other member of the Cabinet in +matters affecting the Soudan.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch3">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. H.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. Hamilton</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right"><em>March</em> 30.</p> +</div> + +<p>Saying it would not be worth while sending a special messenger +to say that Lord Wolseley would forward communications. What is +required is an explanation of what the terms might be if a mission +was sent. While Mr. Gladstone says there is no intention of +restoring Egyptian rule in the Soudan, Wolseley is appointing +Prince Hassan Governor-General, Graham is pounding the “rebels” at +Souakin, and Baring is arresting Zebehr at Cairo. Mr. Blunt is +going abroad and will see those in communication with the Mahdi, +and will ascertain their further views.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Confidential.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, Whitehall,</p> + +<p class="right pad-rightch3"><em>April 2nd</em>, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>All that I am at liberty further to say to you, before you go +abroad, is to remind you that H.M. Government have again and again +declared their objects to be the security of Egypt and the freedom +of the Soudan; and to point out to you that the Mahdi has indicated +to them nothing whatever. If it is thought that the objects of the +British Government are not known to the Mahdi, why cannot steps be +taken to communicate them to him? If they are known to him, surely +it is for him then to make some declaration upon them in +return?</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch7">Yours always,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p>Bon voyage and au revoir.</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to the Right Hon. W. +E. Gladstone</span>, M.P.</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Paris, <em>April</em> 8, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>Yesterday the Mahdi’s principal agent in Europe met me here, and +I went through the whole subject of our recent +correspondence<span class="pagenum" id="Page_600">[600]</span> +carefully with him, and especially the draft of terms suggested in +my first communication, and read to him Mr. Hamilton’s last letter +containing the declaration that the Government policy is that of +freedom for the Soudan and security for Egypt. Of the draft of +terms I am glad to say he fully approves, as a possible basis of +negotiation with the Mahdi, and he is willing to accept the +declaration of policy as generally compatible with that basis. Also +he is prepared to send the Arab gentleman as bearer of a +communication stating that England’s policy is one of “freedom for +the Soudan and security for Egypt,” and he assures me that the +Mahdi will in turn despatch a mission of peace to England, which +may be expected to arrive not later than September. The Arab +gentleman will, moreover, if the Government is willing, arrange in +the interval for an armistice, for the better treatment of +captives, and for immunity for such tribes as may have joined the +English arms.</p> + +<p>The Mahdi’s agent also begged me to say that he trusted the +Government would not be deceived by the reports recently circulated +of defection from the Mahdi’s standard, and so delay despatching +the messenger to Khartoum. There was no truth at all in these +reports, but on the contrary, there was every certainty that as +soon as the agricultural season was over on the Upper Nile, +hostilities would be resumed, nor would these permanently cease as +long as a British or Egyptian army remained in the Soudan. With +regard, however, to an advance upon Egypt proper, he made the +remark that the Mahdi was a reformer, not a conqueror; that he had +no quarrel with the Egyptians either there or elsewhere, many +thousands of them being actually gathered under his flag; and that +the establishment of a just and legal Egyptian Government at Cairo +would at once end any danger of such an advance by depriving it of +excuse in popular sympathy. The Mahdi was popular with the fellahin +of Egypt, because he had rid their brethren, the Soudanese, of an +intolerable tyranny, and they would continue to look on him as a +possible deliverer as long as their wrongs remained unredressed. If +through the means now placed at the Government’s disposal a truce +of two or three years was concluded, England would have time to do +justice, and it would be her fault if at the end of it the war was +renewed. The Mahdi had no mission of conquest in Egypt.</p> + +<p>Finally he requested me to explain that Ministerial declarations +made in England are not understood in the Soudan, and that there is +a great mistrust of all military communications. If the Mahdi had +understood General Gordon as having a really friendly mission +towards the Soudanese he would certainly have entered into friendly +communications with him. But, up to the present<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_601">[601]</span> moment, it has been the +universal belief in the Soudan that England has no other object +than to conquer and retain the country. For this reason it is +essential that the communication of a contrary policy should be +made through some one known to them and promising credit with the +people.</p> + +<p>From all I heard yesterday I am satisfied that it depends wholly +now upon the Government to prolong the Mahdi’s hostility, or change +it into friendship; and I therefore await with much hope your +answer to this letter.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch12">Believe me, my dear Sir, yours very +faithfully,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Confidential.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>April</em> 11, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Mr. Gladstone is obliged for your letter, written from Paris on +the 8th, which I duly delivered to him.</p> + +<p>He does not well see how he can add anything material to the +letter which I wrote to you on the 2nd, and of which he himself was +cognisant, though he was away from London. In that letter there +were reiterated the declared objects of the British Government in +the Soudan, objects which they are as desirous as ever of securing, +and which hardly need to be enlarged upon.</p> + +<p>Let me add a word on my own account. I cannot help thinking you +must understand the delicacy and difficulty which the Government +must feel about holding communications with you, on matters +relating to Egypt, directly or indirectly, when it is believed that +you mistrust and are opposed to the Ruler of that country whom they +are bound and likewise intend to support.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch11">Yours always,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to the Right Hon. W. +E. Gladstone</span>, M.P.</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, James Street, <em>April</em> 14, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>I returned yesterday from Paris, and hasten to answer your last +letter. The Mahdi’s agent is ready now to send the messenger +whenever it suits you to give him the necessary facilities. But he +has impressed very strongly and repeatedly upon me the necessity +there is of his having a <em>written</em> message in Arabic to +deliver. This need not go beyond the sense of the words +Mr.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_602">[602]</span> Hamilton has +already used in writing to me, but it must be in a form +intelligible to the Mahdi and others whom it concerns. Without +this, he says, it will be impossible to convince the Mahdi that the +message is quite sincere on the Government’s part, or at any rate +that his followers should be so convinced. My knowledge of Arab +ideas leads me to feel sure that in this he is only reasonable, nor +do I conceive that the Government, which has already sent written +communications through their Generals to Osman Digna and other +chiefs, would now find a difficulty in writing this message to +their supreme chief Mohammed Ahmed. It will not be necessary that +the title “el Mahdi” should be employed towards him in the letter, +and I could, if desired, suggest a form of address which would be +considered friendly without acknowledging this special pretension. +The strictest secrecy would be maintained by the messenger until +his delivery of the letter at the Mahdi’s camp.</p> + +<p>Thus the suggestion made in Mr. Hamilton’s first letter to me, +that the Mahdi should send a mission to England, can be conveyed to +him in a way he will understand as being sincerely offered; and all +that need further be done will be to instruct the military +authorities to receive with scrupulous courtesy the Envoys on their +arrival at the British lines.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch9">I am, my dear Sir, yours very +faithfully,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Mr. Hamilton</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">St. James Street, <em>April</em> 15, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Eddy</span>,</p> + +<p>I have replied to the first part of your letter in the enclosed +to Mr. Gladstone, and I add a few words in answer to your own +remarks, as I should be sorry there should be additional difficulty +through misunderstanding. For reasons which you know, and for +others which you do not know, I have of course, as you say, +“mistrust” of the Khedive, but the extent of my “opposition” to him +you probably exaggerate. I have had very little correspondence with +Egypt since my last visit there under circumstances which you will +remember, and the failure of Baring’s policy since has been due to +its inherent weakness far more than to the action of his opponents, +certainly than to mine. I believe still what I have always +believed, that there is no course open to the Government, if it +would keep its pledges and have peace in Egypt, but to restore the +National party; and, if that is impossible, then annexation by +Europe, if not by England, is the only end.<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_603">[603]</span> Tewfik has seemed to me up to the +present to stand in the way of such a possible arrangement, and on +this ground especially I have from time to time opposed him; but, +if it could be shown to me that the peace and happiness of Egypt +was compatible with his rule, I should not surely out of obstinacy +refuse to be reconciled.</p> + +<p>The questions, however, of the Soudan and Egypt may for the +immediate present perfectly well be kept apart; and I see no reason +why the Government should hesitate to communicate with me on the +former if not on the latter. They have publicly declared the Soudan +to be independent of Egypt, and Mr. Gladstone has recently assured +me through you that he earnestly desires to maintain its +freedom.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch13">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Confidential.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, <em>April</em> 16, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Mr. Gladstone is afraid that he cannot draw a distinction for +present purposes between Egypt and the Soudan; and so I am obliged +again to point out the difficulty of his holding communications +with yourself on the subject of your correspondence with him.</p> + +<p>It is to be observed that H.M. Government has received no +application from any agent of the Mahdi to be allowed a pass +through the British lines to enable him to deliver a message. I +cannot say with what response such an application might meet.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch12">Yours always,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, 25 <em>April</em>, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>My last note was not intended to invite further remarks. It +aimed rather at hinting that under altered circumstances the +correspondence should close. I am afraid this must be the case. I +have no authority to communicate further with you on the +matter.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch10">Yours always,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. H.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_604">[604]</span><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, 12 <em>May</em>, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Mr. Gladstone is much pleased by your kind gift. The little +volume will much interest him; and he hopes you will accept his +best thanks. He says it will be a pleasure to him to turn from the +Soudan to Proteus.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch13">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. <span class="sc">Hamilton</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Hamilton to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, Downing Street, Whitehall, 11 <em>June</em> +1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Wilfrid</span>,</p> + +<p>Many thanks for your kind note. I hope we have never met but as +friends; and that the only difference which pending changes will +make will be that I may see more of you in relations of “greater +freedom and less responsibility.” I am afraid for some little time +to come I shall be awfully pressed by the ordeal of packing. I have +to turn out not only of office, but of home.</p> + +<p>In haste.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch10">Yours affectionately,</p> + +<p class="right">E. W. H.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to the Right Hon. +Robert Bourke</span>, M.P.</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, James St., <em>July</em> 3, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Bourke</span>,</p> + +<p>As you are doubtless considering the Soudan question just now at +the F.O. I think it may be of assistance to you to know briefly +what has passed between me and the late Government in regard to +possible negociation with the Mahdi.</p> + +<p>It began in April, 1884, when I wrote to Mr. Gladstone in +connection with schemes then on foot for rescuing Gordon, and +offering my services as mediator. Mr. Gladstone seems himself to +have had some inclination to accept, but on reference to the rest +of the Cabinet my offer was declined.</p> + +<p>Secondly I made an attempt in December, through one of the Peace +Societies, to gain a hearing. I had ascertained that the Mahdi +would be accessible to offers of withdrawal for Gordon and the +garrison from Khartoum; and I went to Hawarden with the hope of +seeing Mr. Gladstone and explaining the position to him. But I was +not received.</p> + +<p>Thirdly, after the fall of Khartoum, I again wrote to +Mr.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_605">[605]</span> Gladstone +delivering a message I had received from a religio-political +personage in correspondence with the Mahdi proposing to open +negociations for peace or truce. It was just before Graham’s second +campaign in March; and this time Mr. Gladstone responded, and a +correspondence followed which led to my being authorised to give +certain messages to the personage in question, and I went abroad at +Easter to deliver them. It was then proposed to send a messenger +through the British Lines to explain the pacific views of the +Government, and arrange for the opening of more formal +negociations, and it seemed as if the matter would be arranged; +when for some reason which I do not exactly know the thing +collapsed. I fancy it was on account of the news spread just at +that time of a rival Mahdi having sprung up in Kordofan and the +idea that Mohammed Ahmed was no longer in full power at Khartoum, +but I am not sure. In any case the correspondence suddenly came to +an end.</p> + +<p>Although all this was more or less confidential as between +myself and Downing Street, there is no reason I think now that I +should make any mystery about it to you, especially as it would +probably be open still to Lord Salisbury if he liked to take the +negociation up at the point where Mr. Gladstone dropped it—and I +should be glad if you would show this letter to Lord Salisbury and +offer him the confidential perusal of the papers I have relating to +it. I will not say more at present than that I still think it would +be possible as it would certainly be most desirable to come to +terms with the Mahdi.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch16">Yours very truly,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> + +<p class="space-above15">[N.B.—I cannot find any answer to this +letter, nor do I remember its purport. It led to nothing, the +Mahdi’s death being shortly after announced. But for this it is +probable that Lord Salisbury would have negotiated.]</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to the Marquess of +Salisbury</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right"><em>September</em>, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My Lord</span>,</p> + +<p>I have the honour to lay before your Lordship the fact that I +have received a summons through the Lords of H. M. Treasury to +present myself before the Tribunal of First Instance at Cairo on +the 19th of October next on a matter connected with a property I +hold in Egypt, and to beg your Lordship to inform me whether I +shall receive there the protection usually accorded to<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_606">[606]</span> British subjects. I make this +request in consequence of a notification served on me two years ago +by Sir Evelyn Baring with Earl Granville’s approval to the effect +that I should not then be allowed to land at Suez on my passage +from India.</p> + +<p>For further particulars regarding the case of my exclusion from +Egypt by the late Government I beg to refer your Lordship to Blue +Book, Egypt, No. 27, of 1884, containing my correspondence with the +Foreign Office; to the report of a debate in the House of Commons +of the 4th August of the same year; and to the enclosed +memorandum.</p> + +<p>Your Lordship will observe that Sir Evelyn Baring’s action +against me seems to have been based originally upon a misstatement +of Sherif Pasha regarding a visit paid to Egypt in 1883, and +afterwards to a fear entertained by the late Government that my +influence there would be prejudicial to their policy. But I venture +to hope that your Lordship will not regard me with the same +apprehension, and that, having inquired into the facts, you will +restore to me the protection generally accorded to British subjects +abroad. I may mention that my prolonged absence from Egypt has +occasioned and is occasioning me considerable money losses.</p> + +<p>I am, my Lord, your obedient humble servant,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">The Marquess of Salisbury to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Foreign Office, <em>Oct.</em> 5, ’85.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Mr. Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>We have applied to the Egyptian Government to obtain permission +for you to return—but we have received the most decided negative. +Of course it is in our power to apply pressure to the Egyptian +Government. But if we do so, we shall make ourselves responsible +for the consequences. It is therefore a matter of duty to us, first +to ask you, whether you will undertake not to meddle in any sense +with political questions or projects while you are there? If you +will give us this undertaking we will telegraph to Egerton to do +his best.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch11">Yours very truly,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Salisbury</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to the Marquess of +Salisbury</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">10, James St., <em>Oct.</em> 6, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Lord +Salisbury</span>,</p> + +<p>I most readily undertake not to meddle with political questions +or projects while in Egypt, my object in going there being first +to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_607">[607]</span> look after my +property and secondly to assert the right I possess as an +Englishman of claiming the protection of my Government while +travelling abroad.</p> + +<p>Nor do I wish, if it can be arranged that the case I am cited to +appear on can be postponed so long as till December or January, to +complicate Sir Henry Drummond Wolff’s diplomacy by appearing at +Cairo during his special mission. I quite understand that my +arriving there with him on whatever errand might cause +embarrassment. But, if I do not now insist upon my right, I run the +risk of being perpetually excluded from a country where I have +property and where I may one day desire to reside.</p> + +<p>I therefore hope that you will insist with the Egyptian +Government on the necessity of permitting my visit unmolested.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch11">Yours very truly,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">The Marquess of Salisbury to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Châlet Cécil, <em>September 10th</em>, ’85.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Mr. Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I am much obliged to you for your letter. We are in +communication with Egypt upon the subject matter of it. I have no +wish to cause you any inconvenience, and I hope it will be possible +for us to accede to your wishes. Supposing, however, that we can do +so, it will be necessary to interpose some delay in the manner you +suggest, because I am afraid that your appearance and that of Sir +Drummond Wolff at the same moment in Egypt might lead to +unauthorised and wholly exaggerated rumours upon questions of +future policy.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch11">Yours very truly,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Salisbury</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">The Marquess of Salisbury to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Foreign Office, <em>October</em> 10, ’85.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Mr. Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I did not get your note till my return from Newport. I +telegraphed immediately and have received to-night the answer that +the Khedive, as a matter of deference to H. M. G. is willing to +permit you to come to Egypt, freely for the purpose of looking +after your private affairs. The permission is evidently given with +much apprehension. I need only add that now my honour as well as +yours are involved in your abstaining from any political action—but +that I feel assured we may confidently count upon.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch3">Believe me, yours very truly,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Salisbury</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_608">[608]</span><a id= +"appd"></a>APPENDIX D</h2> + +<p class="sch1">AUTHOR’S CORRESPONDENCE WITH LORD RANDOLPH +CHURCHILL</p> + +<div class="corr"> +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Gastein, <em>August</em> 3, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>Many thanks for your letter, also for the Cairo papers which +amused me. I am sorry to tell you I have not received your book, +“The Future of Islam.” I hope it will reach me as I have every +opportunity of reading so interesting a work with the care and +attention which it deserves. Have you done anything yet about +getting into Parliament. Northcote has come to awful grief over the +Canal which has been much more fatal to him than to Gladstone. I +hope Gorst and Wolff will make long and damaging speeches against +the Khedive on Baring’s vote; Mind you egg them on. This is a +horrid dull place and we are badly lodged. I wish I had done with +it.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch10">Yrs. most sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Randolph S. Churchill</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Lord Randolph Churchill, M.P., +to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Gastein, <em>August</em> 14, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I have to thank you for your two very interesting letters and +enclosures. I cannot see my way to doing anything myself in the +matter, for I am too far off to communicate effectually with you +and secondly it is a sine qua non of these baths that one should do +absolutely nothing. I hope you will write to the Times just to keep +the thing alive, and in the winter by one or two speeches in the +country I shall try to rub it all in. The awkward fact remains that +the Government has made no answer to my indictment and in all +probability cannot make one. You appear to have given up your +intention of going to Ceylon to see Arabi which I am sorry for. +This a desperately dull place and time hangs heavily. The Baths are +lowering I think and one feels quite indisposed for any exertion. I +shall hope to be back in London by the 2nd week in September in +case you should still be there. We leave this on the 29th.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch10">Yrs. most sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Randolph</span> S. C.</p> +</div> + +<p class="space-above15">P.S. I have to thank you for your most +interesting book which reached me safely. When is Ninet’s book +coming out?</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_609">[609]</span><span class="sc">Lord Randolph Churchill, +M.P., to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Innspruck, (end of) <em>August</em> 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I arrived here this morning from Ischl and found your letter for +which many thanks. I have read your poem with pleasure and I need +not say with perfect sympathy. Publish it. Poetry often makes +converts where prose fails. I have no doubt that you are a +Cassandra and that we shall pay dearly for our freaks in Egypt. But +it is a despairing task to try and right the wrong. But I mean to +do what I can in my little way when the proper season for extra +Parliamentary utterances may arrive. I have a horrid idea that the +advent of the opposition to office might be worse for Egypt than +any conceivable eventuality. I imagine from your last letter that +you are still decided on your journey to India, and I wish you a +safe and speedy return.</p> + +<p>The idea of having Arabi elected to the new Senate is ingenious, +but to be effective he should be elected in many districts. +Otherwise it might turn to ridicule.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">Believe me Yours most faithfully,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Randolph S. Churchill</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Lord Randolph Churchill, M.P., +to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Blenheim Palace, <em>Dec.</em> 26, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I have to thank you for three long and highly interesting +letters. I have not written before because I really did not know +whether letters had much chance of reaching you. However if I do +not write you will think I do not value your letters which would be +a great error on your part. I have not much to tell you. I hope by +the time you get this that you will have seen the speech I made at +Edinbro’ on Egypt which is fully reported in the Times of the 19th. +I cannot tell you what effect it produced as you would think me +very conceited. All I can say is that I am more than satisfied. +Tewfik’s position grows more hopeless every day. There is no +Government in Egypt at all. I think we shall be able to make it +very hot for the G. O. M. when Parliament meets. Your poem was very +highly praised in the reviews. Gorst is in India at Hyderabad on +legal business of the Nizam. Please remember me most kindly to Lady +Anne and accept for her and yourself from me the warmest wishes of +the season. Do not delay your return too long. We must have +stirring times in the spring.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch14">Yours ever,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Randolph S. Churchill</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_610">[610]</span><span class="sc">Written by Mr. Blunt and +approved by Lord Randolph Churchill</span> +</p> + +<p class="center space-above15 space-below1">“<span class="sc">Am I +a Tory Democrat?</span>”</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right"><em>May</em> 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p>With regard to English Home Politics I am prepared to support +the Conservative party. That is to say, I desire no change in the +existing Constitution or in the relations between Church and State. +I am opposed to merely secular Education. I am a strong supporter +of the House of Lords. On the land question I should like to see +any measure introduced which should make the acquisition of land +easier for the man of the people, believing this would be a +popular, and in the truest sense, a Conservative measure. I +consider, however, that the principles of liberty and property are +closely connected, and I am altogether opposed to the Radical views +of State ownership in land.</p> + +<p>I am inclined to favour the idea of special commercial +advantages being given to the British Colonies and India; and I am +anxious to see the union between the Colonies and the Empire +preserved.</p> + +<p>In India I am for large reforms in the direction of +self-government, believing these to be absolutely necessary on +financial and political grounds if India is to remain loyal.</p> + +<p>So, too, in Ireland I am in favour of Home Rule. I consider it +urgent to accept the principle of Nationalism, both for Ireland’s +sake and for England’s. My motto would be “Ireland for the Irish +and England for the English.” The plan has succeeded in Hungary and +Galicia in reconciling the Hungarians and Poles to the Austrian +Crown. Why not, therefore, in Ireland?</p> + +<p>Foreign politics are my strongest ground. With regard to these I +am quite clear in my opinion that what is required for England is a +return to plain dealing and respect for international law. These +have been grossly outraged during the last four years by Mr. +Gladstone’s Government, and it is we with our complicated +commercial interests in every part of the globe that will +eventually suffer from the example given. Our relations with the +States of Europe should be based upon a recognition of the fact +that our system of parliamentary and popular government makes +special alliances and secret treaties impossible. Our old-fashioned +diplomacy, with its tortuous dealings, its equivocations and its +concealments, is out of date and needs reform; and I would have the +contrary to all these things introduced as a cardinal point of +policy. As towards Europe we should make the most of our insular +position, increase our navy and protect our shores. But +in<span class="pagenum" id="Page_611">[611]</span> Asia we cannot +be insular, and we must submit to the conditions of Empire as long +as India remains in our charge. In this view we need the alliance +of the Mohammedan nations against Russia, and I am in favour of +England accepting the full responsibility of her position, as the +heir of a great Mohammedan Empire. My quarrel with Mr. Gladstone’s +action in Egypt was not based on any principle of non-intervention, +for I am not a non-interventionist, but because he intervened +unjustly, unwisely and in such a way as to alienate Mohammedan +sympathies. I consider that a duty of reparation is required of +England for the wrong done to the Egyptians and I advocate a +reconciliation with the Sultan and a restoration of the Egyptian +National party. I need hardly say that I am in favour of immediate +peace with the Soudan.</p> + +<p>Lastly, I consider that justice, not mere expediency, should be +the determining law of our conduct towards all nations. I am +strongly averse to the Manchester doctrine which allows injustice +to weaker nations in the interests of finance and trade, though not +of military glory. I believe, on the contrary, that it is England’s +duty to protect weaker nations from injustice where they come in +contact with her. Nor can I convince myself that a high standard of +national morality is incompatible with the extremest Conservative +principles. I believe, on the contrary, that much of what was best +in the so-called “Midlothian” doctrines has more real affinity to +Tory than to Whig instincts; and I should be glad to see these +adopted, now they have been discarded by the Radicals, as part and +parcel of Conservative ideas. Truth, justice, liberty—these are +great names, going at this moment in beggars’ weeds about the +world. Can these find an asylum in the new temple of Tory +Democracy?</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Blunt to Lord Randolph +Churchill</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right"><em>June</em> 8, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Churchill</span>,</p> + +<p>I am glad you have stated so clearly the Conservative policy, in +nearly all of which I heartily agree, though on some points, such +as Ireland, I have larger views than you are prepared for of Home +Rule. The necessity for an inquiry into the working of the Indian +Government is very urgent, and the fact that you should have +included it in your programme, and are to support Mr. Slagg’s +motion, gives me more hope than any thing else which has happened +regarding India during the past year. The truth is that if India +had to trust solely to the Whigs for reform it might wait till +eternity, or rather till that crash came which certainly will +come<span class="pagenum" id="Page_612">[612]</span> if the +rigidity of the present bureaucratic system is not modified. The +Whigs are bureaucrats born and bred and will not stir a finger to +help us.</p> + +<p>With regard to Egypt too, I think you are right. The day for +such a policy as Mr. Chamberlain’s, which he has just announced, +has gone by, and the only agreement which France is likely to come +to with Mr. Gladstone is one which will put Egypt practically into +France’s hands. Two years ago, or even perhaps a year ago, before +the conference and the Nile campaign, Egypt’s complete +independence, under a strong and popular government might have been +secured, but Mr. Gladstone would not hear of it then, and by +persisting in keeping Tewfik as the corner stone of his policy he +has thrown away his chance. Now France will not be content with +anything from him less than her own protectorate, or Europe with +anything less than the letter of her bond. To get back our right to +give Egypt liberty, the first condition will be that we guarantee +her debt; the second that we make peace with the Sultan and act +under his authority. Here, again, therefore, I look rather to you +than to the Whigs for practical help. One knows by experience so +exactly what Mr. Chamberlain’s arrangement would come to—an +independent Egypt would be an Egypt separated from the rest of the +Mohammedan world, but governed really in the sole interests of +France and the bondholders. The form of a “native” government would +be preserved, perhaps, but the form only. Egypt’s “independence by +arrangement with Europe” means Egypt for the bondholders, with +France for their protector and Ismail for their king. If Mr. +Chamberlain had said a word about repentance for past errors I +could have better believed him; but we heard all the promises and +declarations he now makes, two years ago, and in far stronger +language from Mr. Gladstone himself, and with what result? No; I +prefer your programme for Egypt, though it seems to promise +less.</p> + +<p>I will take this opportunity of giving you my view of what a +Conservative Government might do for Egypt and generally for +Western Asia. The Whigs will never do anything but harm, because +they are Whigs and because they hate the Mohammedans, and the +Radicals will never do anything at all, because they are Radicals +and will undertake no responsibility. You know that the Mohammedan +faith is in solution—that it is seeking to place itself on a new +basis—to regenerate its political and social life. Enormous abuses +exist everywhere, enormous injustices. The poor are ground down by +the rich, the weak by the strong. The whole earth, as Arabi used to +say, is famished for justice, and calls out for a deliverer. The +recognition of this was the secret of his own influence. It is the +secret of the Mahdi’s. It may any<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_613">[613]</span> day be the secret of England’s. But in +Mohammedan lands it is not sufficient to administer an equal law +for it to be accepted by the people even for their own good. The +law must be connected with their religious beliefs and sanctioned +by their religious authority. I am not arguing whether it is best +so—though I believe it is best—but am stating a fact. And it is the +perverse refusal to acknowledge facts which has made of Lord +Granville’s policy in Egypt so piteous a failure. His idea would +seem to have been, and Sir Evelyn Baring’s with him—if idea at all +they had—that the people’s faith and social traditions were a +“negligeable quantity,” and that, no matter what the law and no +matter who administered it, it would be accepted with thanks. For +this reason, though Tewfik was notoriously regarded as a traitor to +his faith and nation, they placed him in authority, and men with +him for Ministers whose only merit was that they had preferred +their interests to their beliefs and were without moral principle +or religious prejudice. Even these, however, in later times have +refused to serve them, and they have been forced to take up with +Nubar and his speculating crew of Armenians as the element supple +enough to do their bidding. This has had its effect. The whole of +the religious forces of the country are against them, and the whole +of the people. Their reforms have remained sterile, their attempts +to pacify, impotent. The people have refused their friendship and +their justice, and will have none of their advice. The Liberal +party of Mohammedan reform have been driven out of the country, the +honest men have been driven from the Administration, and the mass +of the people into the arms of the Mahdi.</p> + +<p>It is in the power of England, and England alone, to repair the +evil done—and, what is more, it is England’s duty. But it cannot be +effected except at the cost of assuming Egypt’s sole protection, +and the protection also of general Mohammedan interests. The Sultan +must be taken into confidence, peace must be made with the Mahdi, +and Arabi must be recalled. Europe, too, must be bought out by +accepting Egypt’s debt. These conditions observed, all difficulty, +it will be found, will disappear, and the regeneration of Egypt may +at last be begun, and with it gradually of all the Mohammedan +East.</p> + +<p>It seems to me, therefore, that the Conservative Party, if it +acts on your idea, has a great and satisfactory work before it, +which, if honestly performed, and avoiding the snare of turning +Egypt’s protection into a means of providing Englishmen with places +and pay, may yet redeem the past and give reality to the dreams of +reformers. You especially, with your sympathy for popular causes, +will know that the only foundation of success in the East, as in +the West, is the consent of the people. Get the Egyptian +people<span class="pagenum" id="Page_614">[614]</span> on your +side, and all Mohammedans will follow you, and with hardly an +effort you will transform the world.</p> + +<p>I wish you, therefore, all success in your electoral campaign. +You have given too many proofs of your sincerity and steadfastness +in this matter of Egypt for me to doubt you, and I know that you +will do your best for her. Of the present Government I have long +ceased to have any hope.</p> + +<p class="space-above15">[N.B.—This letter was read to and approved +by Lord Randolph Churchill for publication in the “Times,” with the +alteration of a single phrase concerning Ireland, the words “than +you are prepared for of Home Rule” being changed into “than you are +apparently yet prepared for.”]</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Lord Randolph Churchill to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Most Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">India Office, <em>Aug.</em> 13, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>The enclosed explains itself. Will you see to it?</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch9">Yours ever,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Randolph</span> S. C.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Copy of Telegram from Sir H. +Drummond Wolff</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Enclosure.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Dated Vienna, 12 <em>August</em>, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="center">Received at London Office, 5.10 p.m.</p> + +<p>“I think it would be well for Jemal-ed-din Afghani to come. Have +you (any objection?),<a id="FNanchor_135"></a><a href= +"#Footnote_135" class="fnanchor">[135]</a> if involving no +responsibility or complicity on my part, and if it can be done +without his coming into collision with Turkish authorities. I leave +this probably to-morrow evening or Friday morning.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. A. W. Moore to Mr. +Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">India Office, 15 <em>August</em> /85.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Mr. Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I have just deciphered the enclosed from Sir H. Wolff. Lord +Randolph is unwell and in bed, but I shall see him during the +afternoon. I think it is best however to send you the telegram at +once, as I understand the present arrangement is that Jemal-ed-deen +leaves to-morrow.</p> + +<p>Please let me hear from you what I am to reply to Sir H. +Wolff.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">Yours very truly,</p> + +<p class="right">A. W. <span class="sc">Moore</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_615">[615]</span><span class="sc">Copy of a Telegram from Sir +H. Drummond Wolff</span> +</p> + +<p>(<em>Enclosure.</em>)</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">“Buda Pest, 15 <em>August</em>.</p> +</div> + +<p>“From something I have heard it would be well for Jemal-ed-deen +not to leave England till I can telegraph to you from +Constantinople.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Lord Randolph Churchill, M.P., +to Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">India Office, <em>November</em> 1, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>Many thanks for your letter and enclosures which I return. I +feel sure that your lecture on Egypt at Newcastle must have been +profoundly interesting and instructive to the audience and a little +more circulation of such facts would do much good. You will +certainly not receive an encouraging reply from Lord Salisbury +about Arabi. Even if he was disposed (as I should be) to favour +your views he would not dare take such a step on the eve of the +Elections.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch18">Yours ever,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Randolph S. Churchill</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="sc">Mr. Blunt to Lord Randolph +Churchill</span> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Crabbet Park, <em>Dec.</em> 24, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Churchill</span>,</p> + +<p>I am obliged to come to an immediate decision about continuing +my connection with Camberwell or indeed in any active form with +party politics, my pressing difficulty being Ireland. About this, +now that Mr. Gladstone has taken up Home Rule, it is necessary for +me to speak and at once to my Electors; and, unless I hear from you +that there is still hope of an agreement between Lord Salisbury and +Mr. Parnell on a really solid basis, I shall conclude, as everybody +tells me it is, that Conservatism and Home Rule are for the present +incompatible terms and give up trying to make them agree. I fear I +have not in me the spirit of a good party man, but I thought at one +time I could help you individually in the pursuit of better things. +Egyptian affairs seem in the same deadlock they were a year ago, +and altogether I am far from hopeful or disposed for further +combat.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch12">Yours very truly,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_616">[616]</span><span class="sc">Lord Randolph Churchill to +Mr. Blunt</span> +</p> + +<p><em>Private.</em> +</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">India Office, <em>Dec.</em> 26, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>There is no question or doubt about the matter. If you want Home +Rule you must go to Gladstone for it. We cannot touch it.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch10">Yours ever,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Randolph</span> S. C.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_617">[617]</span><a id= +"appe"></a>APPENDIX E</h2> + +<p class="sch1">ARABI’S PROGRAMME OF 1883 AND MOHAMMED ABDU’S +VIEWS</p> + +<h3>I. <span class="sc">Mr. Blunt’s Letter reprinted from the +“Times” of 13th December</span> 1883</h3> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Colombo, <em>5th Nov.</em>, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>I am sure the “Times” has many readers who will be interested to +receive an account from an authentic source of the manner of life +and present views of Arabi Pasha and his fellow exiles in the place +of residence which nearly a year ago was assigned to them by the +British Government.</p> + +<p>I have been staying with them now for over three weeks, as their +guest, and am therefore able to speak with some authority as to +their ideas; and I think the time has come when these may be of +service to the public, and, if I may be allowed to suggest it, +perhaps even to those all-wise authorities who are still seeking to +regenerate Egypt by putting round men into square holes, and square +into round from their official chairs in Downing Street.</p> + +<p>With regard to the material welfare of the exiles, I am glad to +have an excellent account to give. Although some of them suffered +at first from the extreme dampness of the climate, all are now +acclimatized; and even Toulba Pasha, who six months ago was +pronounced by the doctors to be incurable with asthma, is enjoying +perfect health.</p> + +<p>They are all, too, I think, contented in mind and grateful for +the treatment they receive from the Colonial authorities, which has +been throughout most courteous to them; and except for certain +inequalities in the amount of their allowances, with which I will +not here trouble you, they would have nothing to complain of beyond +the unavoidable bitterness which mingles with the bread of all +exiles.</p> + +<p>The way of life of the exiles is simple. Each family occupies a +separate dwelling, and most of them have chosen to reside in a +rather remote suburb of Colombo, which has ceased to be +fashionable, and where house rent is proportionately low. They send +their children to school, attend the local mosques, pay visits to +each other or to their neighbours, and attempt, with more or less +success, themselves to learn a little English. Their society they +find in the numerous Mohammedan community at Colombo,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_618">[618]</span> which, unlike such communities +in many parts of India, is entirely mercantile, and possesses not a +few men of substance, whose commercial establishments the more +practical of the exiles hope that some day their sons will enter, +and thus be enabled to earn an independent livelihood.</p> + +<p>The Mohammedan community regard their Egyptian guests with +feelings of the highest respect, as martyrs to their religion, and +especially Arabi, as its late most famous champion; and so strong +is this feeling regarding him among the lower class in Colombo that +on Fridays, whatever mosque Arabi may choose to attend is sure to +be thronged with a special crowd of worshippers. Besides this, +however, there are certain English houses where the exiles are well +received; and, on the whole, I think I may say that they are as +popular as their ignorance of English will allow with the official +community and the official residents.</p> + +<p>I have naturally had constant conversations with the exiles on +political matters, and more especially with Arabi, and have learned +from him and unlearned much as to the events of last year. We have +spoken, too, not a little of the future, and of the hopes which the +national leader still cherishes of being one day recalled to Egypt, +there to work out to its accomplishment the plan of reform he had +conceived, and which I firmly believe that he alone possesses the +genius to realize. For, whatever may have been his faults and +failings (and they were doubtless great and many in his conduct +both of the political and of the military campaigns of last year), +I have been more than ever impressed during my present visit with +the reality of Arabi’s claim to be considered a patriot and a man +of genius. By a man of genius I understand one who is capable of +large and new ideas, who has the passion to impress these strongly +upon others, and who above all possesses the courage and +persistence required to work them to their end. These qualities +Arabi certainly has, and I know of no other Egyptian of whom +anything corresponding can be said.</p> + +<p>His view of the present situation in Egypt is worth quoting:</p> + +<p>“The English Government is attempting,” he says, “an impossible +task. They wish to make Tewfik popular and they wish to introduce +reforms. But Tewfik will only remain popular as long as he is +supported by the English troops; and when these are withdrawn he +will fall. Personally, Tewfik is without a friend in Egypt. The +Egyptians hate him for having betrayed his country, and the +Circassians despise him for having betrayed his religion. The +better friend he is to the English the less chance he has of +conciliating his countrymen. In one way or other he will disappear. +Then it will be for the Powers finally to decide what it is they +really intend for Egypt. If they mean to annex it, one +or<span class="pagenum" id="Page_619">[619]</span> other of them +will do so at the cost of a new revolt. If not, they must allow the +Egyptians to choose their ruler and to work out their freedom for +themselves.”</p> + +<p>The choice of a ruler should be made, Arabi thinks, by the +Notables. The fellahin are not sufficiently instructed yet for a +plebiscite. But the Sheikhs of the villages with the Notables of +the towns would form a reasonable elective body. They would choose +whom they would, a Mohammedan, a man of mark, Arabi hopes an +Egyptian. But before investing him with power they would bind him +by some Constitutional form which should prevent the recurrence of +mere arbitrary rule, the rule which has ruined Egypt. Lord +Dufferin’s charter, Arabi considers, is insufficient for that +purpose. It is a make believe, too weak to restrain the abuse of +power, and liable through its weakness to become itself an +instrument in the hands of despotism. Egypt, however, under a +leader elected by the Notables, would find Notables capable of +asserting and maintaining their rights; and a Constitutional +Chamber would form itself without the need of any more foreign +assistance. The Liberal Party, it is true, is now crushed and in +hiding; but it would start from the ground with the least +encouragement and find life again. Arabi does not at all despair of +his countrymen, could the present unnatural regime be replaced by +one sanctioned by public approval. The approval of the people is +the basis of all stable government; and, whoever the new ruler of +Egypt is, he must be made to understand that Egypt is not given him +as a property but as a trust. Ismaïl Pasha thought all Egypt was +his private garden. Tewfik Pasha is being taught to think that +there is no law but what rests on his decree. This must not be in +the future; the Prince must obey the law, not make it.</p> + +<p>Again, the English Government is trying to introduce reforms, +but through what instruments? It has driven away all the real +reformers. They are in exile or in prison, or have been fined and +otherwise frightened by police persecution to live “underground.” +The men who are left are either those who are too timid or too +indifferent to join the party of liberty, or else the very men +against whom the reformers rose. “How,” asks Arabi, “can the +English Government expect to establish justice through the Pashas +who served Ismaïl, or liberty for the Egyptians through those very +Turks and Circassians who have always hated liberty, and who look +upon the Egyptians as their natural servants?”</p> + +<p>With regard to finance, Arabi is of opinion that the best chance +of permanently saving the solvency of the country lies in a new +arrangement with the creditors. He says that the calculations of +the Budget in recent years have been made without reference +to<span class="pagenum" id="Page_620">[620]</span> the periodical +recurrence of seasons of scarcity. There have been now five good +Niles in succession, and there must come soon a bad one, which will +upset the estimates. Also no allowance has been made for the recent +great loss of capital by the fellahin, the murrains which have +destroyed their oxen, the debts they have incurred, their now +universal poverty. Unless the burdens of the fellahin are made very +light for them for several years to come, they will never recover +their prosperity and the land will become deteriorated and +impoverished. Arabi is of opinion that in the interest of the +creditors themselves it would therefore be prudent to lower the +rate of interest for a fixed number of years, full payment to be +resumed only at the end of the term when the country would be able +to afford it. He thinks this, with great economy everywhere, is the +best means of averting bankruptcy. The private debts of the +fellahin should be settled also without delay by an arrangement to +be made with the creditors by the Government; and I may say here +that while I was recently in Egypt I ascertained from some of the +leading money lenders that a composition would probably be accepted +by them at from eight to ten millions, the total debts being valued +by the same persons at about fifteen millions.</p> + +<p>The future of the Suez Canal we have thoroughly discussed +together, and it is Arabi’s opinion, as it has long been mine, that +the Canal is certain, sooner or later, to be internationalized. +Arabi considers that it would be far better for Egypt that she +should abandon as soon as possible all sovereign rights over it. +The Isthmus of Suez, he says, is not necessary to Egypt, and the +connection as long as it exists will form a pretext with Europe for +intervention. If ceded to Europe this danger would cease, and Egypt +might even claim a money indemnity for the rights yielded and so +relieve herself of part of her financial difficulties.</p> + +<p>Another important point on which the late national leader has +distinct views is the Soudan question. Although he is of opinion +that a certain connection will always be necessary between the +lower and the upper waters of the Nile, he holds that in the +present military and financial position of Egypt it is unwise to +attempt the reconquest of all, or perhaps any of the lost +provinces. He believes that the movement of the so-called Mahdi is +not one merely of fanaticism, or that it is only a revolt of the +slave dealers. He thinks that Mohamed Ahmed commands the goodwill +of the inhabitants, and that it would be far wiser for the Egyptian +Government to come to terms with him than to continue their +military operations against him. The Soudan brings nothing into the +Cairo treasury, and if Egypt is to enjoy liberty at home she should +avoid ideas of conquest abroad. What terms<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_621">[621]</span> could be made with the Mahdi Arabi has been +too long out of Egypt to judge; but from the communications which +reached him while in power, he does not believe a friendly +arrangement acknowledging Egypt’s suzerainty to be impossible. The +suzerainty of the ruler of Egypt the Soudanese would probably be +glad to acknowledge, for it would protect them against European +aggression.</p> + +<p>Lastly, Arabi suggests the following as the most urgent matters +requiring reform in his country:</p> + +<p>“1. That a settlement should be made by the Government of the +existing debts of the peasantry, accompanied with a return to the +old laws affecting the mortgaging of land and the recovery of debt +so that the peasantry shall be thenceforth protected against +usury.</p> + +<p>“2. That the mixed tribunals should be abolished.</p> + +<p>“3. That there should be a reformed common law in Egypt for all +who reside there, placing Europeans and Egyptians on an equal +footing in civil and in criminal matters.</p> + +<p>“4. That there should be security against arbitrary arrest and +imprisonment (habeas corpus).</p> + +<p>“5. That the village Sheykhs should be chosen by the villages, +not appointed as now by the Mudirs.</p> + +<p>“6. That the abuses connected with forced labour should be +reformed.</p> + +<p>“7. That education should be extended to girls as well as boys +in Egypt.</p> + +<p>“8. That domestic slavery should be completely abolished.</p> + +<p>“9. That the position of officials in public offices should be +made independent of ministerial caprice.</p> + +<p>“10. That taxes should be made equal to all, foreigners alike +with Egyptians.</p> + +<p>“11. That a settlement should be made as soon as possible of the +Moukabala claims.”</p> + +<p class="space-above15">Such are Arabi’s ideas. I believe many of +his reforms will be found identical with those contemplated by Sir +Evelyn Baring, but I fear their realization will have to wait the +advent of a more enlightened policy than any which now prevails at +Cairo. As Arabi says, schemes of reform are of value only when in +the hands of reformers, and there is no sign as yet in Egypt of any +such being employed. Still, common sense will in the long run +assert itself over political experiment, and there is an old +proverb about the stone which the builders rejected, which may well +in the present instance prove itself a true one; and I cannot help +thinking that the day will come when the man who first +proclaimed<span class="pagenum" id="Page_622">[622]</span> Egyptian +wrongs will be called upon to right them, and when Arabi, the first +fellah who ever gloried in the name “Egyptian,” will be brought +back with something more than his old prestige to Egypt.</p> + +<p>A rather severe attack of fever, from which I am hardly yet +recovered, prevents me from continuing this train of thought. But I +hope on a future occasion to renew it, and in the meanwhile I am +sure that Arabi’s friends may make themselves happy as to his +present lot. He is not yet forty-five years of age, and can well +afford to wait a while for the hour of his restoration, and till it +comes he could hardly have a pleasanter home or a more secure abode +than that which Providence and the humanity of the British public +have chosen for him.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch9">I am your obedient servant,</p> + +<p class="right"><span class="sc">Wilfrid Scawen Blunt</span>.</p> +</div> + +<h3><a id="appe2"></a>II. <span class="sc">Interview with Sheykh +Mohammed Abdu, as published in the “Pall Mall Gazette,” August +17th</span>, 1884</h3> + +<p>Sheykh Mohammed Abdu is, we are inclined to believe, the first +real Egyptian who has visited this country. We have had among us +false Egyptians in plenty—Turks, Circassians, Syrians, Armenians, +Jews—all claiming the nationality of the Nile; but a true son of +the Ahl el Ful, “the Race of Beans,” never. Sheykh Mohammed Abdu, +however, is an undoubted fellah. He wears a blue gown and a white +turban, talks neither French nor English nor even Turkish, but only +his mother tongue, Arabic, and is without the least varnish of +western manners. He is a man of middle height, dark-skinned, +black-bearded, and keen-eyed, grave in his general demeanour, but +possessed of a pleasant smile, and, when excited, speaking with +much modest eloquence and cheerful vigour. His countenance is +decidedly an agreeable one, and brimful of intelligence. His father +was and is still a peasant of the Delta, cultivating forty acres of +land at Mehallet Nasr, and laying no claim to nobility of birth +other than that given by countless generations of peasant ownership +on the same plot of ground. But the son is far more now than a +peasant. Sent twenty years ago as a promising boy to Cairo, he +received his education in the ancient religious seminary of El +Azhar, and is now one of the most distinguished of its Ulema, or +rather was, for, in common with the rest of the Liberal religious +party in the university, he is in disgrace with the powers that be, +and is now an exile both from it and from Egypt. Although by +temperament a moderate man, he joined Arabi and the popular +movement before the war, became one of<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_623">[623]</span> its chief leaders, and was involved in its +ruin; and after Tel-el-Kebir he was singled out by his eloquence no +less than by his liberalism as a dangerous man, and having narrowly +escaped hanging was glad to reach Syria with his head safe upon his +shoulders, but condemned to three years’ exile and its attendant +penury. Now he is on his first visit to Europe, to see with his own +eyes the country which has been the ruin of his own. These +particulars our representative, who called two days since on the +Sheykh at Mr. Wilfrid Blunt’s house in James Street, learned from +his lips, and being acquainted with Arabic he was able to hold with +him the following conversation:</p> + +<p><em>Our Representative</em>: Without discussing past history, +which we all admit to have contained fearful mistakes, what is your +opinion of the present state of Egypt and of the policy now to be +pursued?</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh Mohammed Abdu</em>: Since I have been in England all +have asked me the same question. Every Englishman says he wishes +Egypt well; but which of your statesmen has tried to prove his +declarations? We Egyptians of the Liberal party believed once in +English Liberalism and English sympathy; but we believe no longer, +for facts are stronger than words. Your liberality we see plainly +is only for yourselves, and your sympathy with us is that of the +wolf for the lamb which he designs to eat. You have ruined +everything that was good in us so that you may have an excuse for +keeping possession of our country.</p> + +<p><em>O. R.</em>: Believe me, this is not true. It may appear to +you so; but it is not so. Neither Mr. Gladstone, nor any of the +Ministers, wish otherwise than to leave Egypt as soon and as +absolutely as possible. No one wishes to annex your country.</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: If so, why not leave it at once? The only thing +that the English Government has taught us is to be united in the +wish to see you gone. Before the war and during the war we +quarrelled with each other. We wished to break down the tyranny of +our rulers; we complained of the Turks as foreigners; we wished to +improve ourselves politically, and to advance as the nations of +Europe have advanced in the path of liberty. Now we know that there +are worse evils than despotism, and worse enemies than the Turks. +We see in them our brothers in religion, if not in race; and if you +would only leave us alone with them we should know how to get on in +peace. There is no Mohammedan in Egypt so oppressed as to wish for +any more of your help. We ask only one thing of you, and that is +that you will leave us at once and for ever.</p> + +<p>And Tewfik, do you include him in your forgiveness of the +Turks?</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_624">[624]</span><em>Sheykh</em>: +Tewfik Pasha did us a great wrong in bringing you into our country. +He joined the enemies of his religion at the time of the war, and +it is impossible he can command our respect. But if he should +repent, and especially if he should get rid of you, we might yet +forgive him. Only we desire no traitors with Egyptian faces and +English hearts.</p> + +<p>And the French? Our leaving Egypt now would surely mean that +they would occupy your country in our place.</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: We do not think so. The French know that they +could not gain our consent to their rule any more than you have +gained it for your own. We should resist them, as we have resisted +you. We want no foreign rulers from any country, and we know how to +make all such rule impossible. The French could not in any case do +us more harm than you have done.</p> + +<p>And the Mahdi?</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: Mohammed Ahmed is only dangerous to Egypt +through your presence there. Were you to leave Egypt he would +neither wish to attack us nor would his doing so be any danger. At +present he has the sympathy of the masses, because they see in him +a deliverer from Christian aggression, and they will join him when +he comes to them.</p> + +<p>And when will this be?</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: The partisans of Mohammed Ahmed are already in +the Saïd (Upper Egypt), but he will only himself advance when +Khartoum is taken. Your Government are doing all they can to +strengthen him.</p> + +<p>How so?</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: By the treaty they have made with the King of +Abyssinia. This has made every man a fanatic, for it is written in +our traditions, and is known to all, that through the Abyssinians +our Holy City, Mecca, will be one day attacked and destroyed. The +people everywhere see in this a new danger to their religion. How +can your statesmen have made an alliance with this barbarous +people? How can they have added this new trouble to the rest?</p> + +<p>But were not all the Soudan people fanatics already?</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh (laughing)</em>: The Soudani are no more fanatics +than I am. When I taught philosophy at Cairo many of the Egyptian +students were afraid to come to my lectures; but there were +eighty-four students from the Soudan, and every one of them came. +When, however, they are threatened with a foreign invasion they +become fanatical, just as you would be if a Mohammedan army were in +the streets of London.</p> + +<p>And has this anything to do with the news of a rising in +Arabia?</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: The news is true. We had been expecting it for +a long<span class="pagenum" id="Page_625">[625]</span> while; and I +do not doubt that your treaty with the Abyssinians has hastened it. +When they are threatened, the Moslems take up arms. The people of +Yemen are not fanatics more than the Soudani; but they love their +liberty, as all the Arabs do.</p> + +<p>And what ought we to do to allay the storm?</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: Cease to threaten us, and leave our +country.</p> + +<p>But what would become of the Christians in Egypt were our troops +to leave? Would there not be new massacres?</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: There have been no massacres in Egypt except +those caused by yourselves. The arrival of your fleet at Alexandria +made the riots there begin. The landing of your troops brought on +the riots at Tantah. There was no loss of Christian life until you +came; nor will there be any when you go away. We have no quarrel +with Christians as long as they abide by our laws and do not +attempt to interfere with our Government.</p> + +<p>There is then, you think, no obstacle to peace and prosperity in +Egypt except our presence there? Would you not wish to see the +National party restored before we go? Would you not like yourself +to return to Egypt?</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: If I believed that your Government had any +serious wish for our good I would propose a policy. But what is the +use of my wasting words?</p> + +<p>Speak, nevertheless. Whatever the Government may mean or wish, +there are many in England who would see justice done to Egypt at +any cost.</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: If England wanted to repair the wrong she has +done us she would, as I have said, give us a first proof of her +sincerity by ordering back her troops from Egypt. Next she would +agree with the Powers of Europe and his Majesty the Sultan, with +regard to a new ruler for us. It is not for me to say who this +ruler should be. But whoever may be chosen, he should be some one +not distasteful to the people and approved by the Sultan, and he +should be named for a term of years, say seven or ten, at the end +of which term the people should be allowed to elect their rulers +finally for themselves. If he proved an honest man he might then +retain office. But if dishonest, the people would have the comfort +of thinking that he would not be there for ever, and so would take +patience.</p> + +<p>But how could we ascertain the wishes of the people? By what +form of election?</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: Any new ruler now who should be a Moslem, and +should come into office as the deliverer of Egypt from the English +troops, would be loved by the Egyptians. Only he must be a +Mohammedan, and, if possible, an Egyptian by birth. It is +essential, however, that he should be content with limited +power.<span class="pagenum" id="Page_626">[626]</span> What we want +is not a new king, but a chief of our Egyptian nation, acting under +the religious sovereignty of the caliphate. This kind of ruler the +Egyptians understand, and they do not want a king.</p> + +<p>And under such a ruler you and your fellow exiles could return +to Egypt? What do you say about Arabi?</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: I should like to see his return. If he holds +office Arabi’s place is in the Council, which must always +supplement and control the ruler of Egypt. He speaks well. His +ideas are noble. He is an honest man. His influence would all be on +the side of good. But he is too careless of details to be a good +administrator or a good general. Let him return as President, if +they choose him, of the Mejliss—that is his place.</p> + +<p>And the Ministry? What our Government complains of is that they +cannot get a working set of men to rule the country.</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: It is their fault if they have failed. Egypt is +not wanting in honourable men, or men of capacity. But you insist +on having those who will do your work; and no honest man in Egypt +will work for the English Government. Again, you insist that they +must rule your way and speak your language. The honest men +generally do not speak English. They do not love English ways. Let +us have a ruler we like, and we will all join to help him. We all +want reform. We all want justice. We all want instruction. But +there is an old proverb which says that “if the fish stinks at the +head there is no freshness in the tail,” and we want a ruler we can +respect. Give us an honest chief for our nation, get him the +sanction of our Sovereign the Sultan, and leave us to ourselves. +With God’s blessing we will have peace. We will even try to pay our +debt.</p> + +<p>But do all the Egyptians think as you do? I am inclined to +believe that nine out of ten of the fellaheen would sooner have +their taxes lessened by a Christian Government than raised by a +Mohammedan.</p> + +<p><em>Sheykh</em>: Do not delude yourself. The fellaheen are +overtaxed, but at the present moment they do not complain of their +taxes. They think first of how to deliver their country from the +stranger; and, if it were possible, they would willingly pay more +to see this end accomplished. I know it, as I have correspondents +everywhere in Egypt. You might abolish all taxation, and they would +not bless you if at the same time you took it as an excuse to stay. +No, no. Leave us now, and we will call on God to reward you as our +benefactors. But do not attempt to do us any more good. Your good +has done us too much harm already.</p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_627">[627]</span><a id= +"appf"></a>APPENDIX F</h2> + +<p class="sch1">EXTRACTS FROM LADY ANNE BLUNT’S DIARY</p> + +<p><em>Dec.</em> 8, 1882, <em>Friday</em> [10, James +Street].—General C. G. Gordon came to breakfast at 9. I am only +sorry, now I have made his acquaintance, not to have known him +sooner. He does not appear to be otherwise than in perfect +possession of perfect common sense. So much has been said to imply +his being “touched” in the head that I put this down as a very +distinct impression. But he is a man of ideas and in a prominent +position, and as such it is convenient to find his ideas utopian or +“mad.” He staid about two hours talking to Wilfrid—told us he +believed the Government now “sincerely” (because it suits them) +intend to carry out liberal policy—Chamber of Notables, etc.—in +Egypt. Wilfrid replied that he would believe it when he saw that on +the Budget question they act in such a manner, and he will judge +them by what they settle about taxation. If they lighten the taxes +of the fellahin it will be a proof of their sincerity. Nothing +short of that will do, as the condition of the poor people is too +desperate to be otherwise mended. General Gordon would not allow +that any <em>party</em> in Egypt could really abolish slavery. It +was in their nature to keep slaves—they could not change their +nature. He does not, I think, quite know the state of feeling in +the Mohammedan world or make allowance for the growth of a +determination to reform on the part of those who, not having great +possessions of slaves or anything else, will not be making great +sacrifices in joining to suppress it.</p> + +<p>He is going out to “Palestine,” he says, next week. He must be +being sent, though he did not say it, to inquire into the state of +the Mussulman world there. Wilfrid promised to send the papers +about the Sheykhs in Jerusalem to him (copies) and asked him to +occupy himself with their case, which he said he would inquire +into.</p> + +<p>And so we parted. I hope we shall see him again.</p> + +<p><em>August</em> 18, 1883 [London].—At 1 o’clock Colonel [D.H.] +Stewart came to luncheon. He has become very official in his views, +though not in his manners. He spoke of the hanging of the Bedouins +at Tantah, and said that a friend of his who saw it remarked how +easily they died; they had hardly to be touched by the rope before +they were dead. There would be no fear of any Englishman being +attacked in the desert, he thought, for a long time owing to the +terror spread by these executions. He seemed surprised +when<span class="pagenum" id="Page_628">[628]</span> I said on the +contrary that anywhere in the Arabian desert it would be very +unsafe in consequence. Wilfrid added, of course in the Sinai +peninsula it would be safe—there it always was safe (the danger had +been from the war). In the end Colonel Stewart exclaimed, “Ah, +well, I see we shall never agree, I wish England to be successful, +justly if possible, and unjustly if it cannot be justly.” He went +away at 3.</p> + +<p><em>Sept.</em> 30 [Cairo].—List of persons arrested in +connection with the pretended “Société des Vengeurs”:</p> + +<ul class="simple1"> +<li>Huseyn Bey Fehmy</li> + +<li>Mustafa Bey Sidky</li> + +<li>Abd el Razak Bey</li> + +<li>Abd el Rahman Bey Hoja</li> + +<li>Mohammed Bey Fenni</li> + +<li>Ali Bey Fauzi</li> + +<li>Sheykh Ahmed Nur</li> + +<li>Mohammed Bey Shami</li> + +<li>Huseyn Eff. Sagr</li> + +<li>Saad Eff. Zaghloul</li> + +<li>Mustafa Eff. Nashaat</li> + +<li>Mahmud Eff. Soudani</li> + +<li>Mohammed Bey Tahir</li> + +<li>Osman Bey (his son)</li> + +<li>Ahmed Eff. Rashaat</li> + +<li>Mohammed Said (the French doctor)</li> + +<li>also one Iskander and five servants.</li> +</ul> + +<p><em>Sept.</em> 30.—Suleyman’s account of Yusuf Abu Diab’s death: +Yusuf was a great friend of his (Suleyman’s), and of Abd el Aal +whose A.D.C. he was, a very good fellow, and all that had been said +against him was false. On the day of the Tantah massacre Yusuf abu +Diab arrived from Damietta at 4 of the day. The massacre had begun +at 1 of the day and was still going on, for it lasted twelve hours +or more. At the station on getting out of the train Yusuf saw a +poor Christian woman from Alexandria whom the people were about to +kill. Yusuf saved her and taking her by the hand conducted her to +the Governorat, to the Mudir Ibrahim Adhem, who was sitting in his +room. Yusuf placed her in the Mudir’s charge, and afterwards +reproached the Mudir for sitting still there while the massacre was +going on. He said, “You are Mudir and all the troops and police are +under your orders. You must take soldiers and go out and stop this. +I shall inform Arabi Pasha of what you have allowed to happen.” He +took the next train and went to inform Arabi. A few days after, Ali +Pasha Fehmi was sent to Tantah to arrest the Mudir and bring him to +Cairo where he was imprisoned in the Kasr en Nil for a few days and +then sent to his house and ordered to remain there.</p> + +<p>After the war Suleyman (the narrator) was for a month in prison +with Yusuf. He had been arrested with Abd el Aal saying, “If you +are to die I will die with you,” and he was with Abd el Aal in +prison at Cairo. In the meantime Ibrahim Adhem was reinstated by +Tewfik at Tantah, and hearing Yusuf was in prison at Cairo he had +him sent for to be tried before the Commission of<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_629">[629]</span> Inquiry at Tantah. On his +arrival Ibrahim came to visit Yusuf. Suliman was present in the +courtyard of the prison. Ibrahim Adhem took Abu Diab by the +moustache and said, “The day of the massacre here you came and +brought a <em>Nasranieh</em> to me; you abused me and you said you +would inform Arabi Pasha. Was it you who did this?” “It was I.” +“<em>Inshallah</em>, you shall not come out of this but to be +hanged.” This was just outside the room in the courtyard. Ibrahim +Adhem then brought half-a-dozen men, Copts and Muslims, from the +station and Abd er Rahman the zabit of Tantah, and said to them, +“You will go before the <em>Mejliss Tahkik</em>, and say that on +the day of the massacre I saw Yusuf abu Diab saying to the people, +“Kill the Christians,” and also that he often told Arabi Pasha that +he ought to “kill Tewfik or let me do so,” but he was not willing. +A certain Mahriz Bey of Alexandria also bore witness against him +falsely; these men swore through fear. The Commission sent Yusuf +back to the Court Martial at Cairo with the <em>procès-verbal</em>, +and the Court-Martial sentenced him to be hanged. Three days later +he was sent to Tantah and executed. He was brave. Suleyman remained +with him to the end. His last words to the people standing round +him were “O my brothers, I suffer injustice. But God grant you may +not see a day the like of this again and that I may be the last of +those unjustly condemned.” Then Ibrahim Adhem came up and said, “O +Yusuf Effendi, forgive me.” And Yusuf answered, “I do not forgive +with my tongue, for if I should forgive with my tongue my heart +would not forgive, and if my heart should forgive my children here +would not forgive, and if my children should forgive, our Lord +(God) would not forgive, for you are the cause of my being unjustly +destroyed.” Then he said, “Give me some water.” And they give it +him and he drank a few mouthfuls and said, “Put the rope on +me.”</p> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2><span class="pagenum" id="Page_630">[630]</span><a id= +"appg"></a>APPENDIX G</h2> + +<p class="sch1">LETTERS TO MR. BLUNT ALLUDED TO IN, AND +EXEMPLIFYING, THE TEXT</p> + +<h3>I. <span class="sc">From Sir William and Lady Gregory +(extracts)</span></h3> + +<p class="center">(<em>From Lady Gregory.</em>)</p> + +<p>Coole, <em>Sep.</em> 20, 1883 (received in Egypt). I am very +glad you will stay in Egypt, even long enough to let in a little +ray of light on what is going on. Moberly Bell is really excelling +himself just now. I don’t know if you have missed his accounts of +the triumphal progress of the “amiable and virtuous” (Tewfik). I am +delighted at it, because, as I wrote to Chenery, no one can say it +is necessary to keep troops in the country to keep up so popular a +ruler! The account of the prisons also would have been entertaining +if they were not revolting—so many poor wretches kept there for +months and years, and then the door is opened and they are shut up +again, after having been allowed to kiss Moberly’s boots! I am +afraid Clifford Lloyd, the new “Adviser,” won’t be an acquisition. +I don’t know him, but by all accounts he is ambitious, pretentious, +and autocratic. He kept the country quiet here by driving the whole +population of a town into prison, on suspicion, and his photograph +reminds me of Colvin. There is not much to say of Ireland, for +there is a strange lull in the agitation of the last few years. The +people for the moment are busy with the harvest, and I fancy +Parnell is trying to keep things as quiet as possible until the +next session, when Gladstone has, I believe, promised him a very +large measure of Home Rule, much more than his colleagues approve +of . . . I hope Arabi’s election will take place, so that we may +put M.P. after his name in future. I hope they will think also of +electing you, and that you will become the Randolph of debate in +the Cairo House of Commons. What a farce the whole thing is! It +will be as before. The wretched Notables will be left alone until +they speak of the Budget, and then will be gagged.</p> + +<p><em>Oct.</em> 4. Sir William writes to me from London that you +are credited with having gone to India with the intention of +overturning English supremacy and establishing Mohammedan rule and +rapine throughout the Peninsula. So I think you have still a chance +of Tower Hill! Kinglake especially has been lamenting over you.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_631">[631]</span><em>Oct.</em> +17. Thank you for your letter from Suez. It gave me great pleasure +to hear of the success of your visit (to Cairo), for I call it a +success having seen so many of your friends, and learned that the +Khedive’s state is so hopeless. I was pretty sure Baring would not +do much for you; he has only just begun, and has not yet realized +the difficulty of his position, and I am sure the Government here +are trusting to him now as their last hope of helping them out of +their mess, and won’t take any new line till he fails. I am glad +the poem (“The Wind and the Whirlwind”) is to be published. It will +make a more lasting impression than any prose could do, and ever +since it was written I have felt it was pure waste of steam power +keeping it shut up. Sir William is very much struck with it, and I +feel it must convert the world. If this should reach you in Ceylon +do homage to Arabi for me.</p> + +<p><em>Nov.</em> 13. I see Moberly Bell takes Gladstone’s +announcement of the withdrawal of the troops calmly, as they will +be quite as effective at Alexandria, and easy to bring back at a +moment’s notice. None the less, I shall be glad when they are out +of Cairo. I hate the idea of ever seeing them there, and perhaps +the Khedive may think they are really going to let him be his own +master, and commit some atrocity which Gladstone will have to +notice, and which will give England an excuse to let him topple +over.</p> + +<p><em>December</em> 18. Your letter in the “Times” (from Colombo) +appeared the same day I heard from you. Sir William tells me to say +how extremely good he thinks it. The time has nearly come when you +will be appealed to, the mess is so great, and the bankruptcy of +the country seems within measurable distance, and, indeed, is the +first thing to hope for, and every one is so much at sea about the +Soudan, and all the philanthrophists will be down on the Government +for allowing Zebehr, the king of the slave-dealers banished by +Gordon, to be sent back at the head of an army. It will be just the +thing for those benevolent beings—Randolph and Labouchere—to take +up.</p> + +<p><em>Jan.</em> 10, 1884. I saw in the “Times” that you had +arrived and been warmly received at Calcutta. I wonder how Colvin +received you. I think the time has come when you are wanted in +Egypt. Dicey goes there to-day, a fellow passenger of Sir William’s +(on his way to Ceylon), evidently to help to form the Nubar-Dicey +Ministry, which I have always looked forward to as the last +possible combination before Arabi’s return. I am glad old Sherif +has gone. We shan’t hear much more of his enlightened policy! If +you could find any Nationalists in Egypt who would dare to lift up +their voice and call for Arabi’s return, I believe the English +Radicals would take up the cry. Both Labouchere and +Randolph<span class="pagenum" id="Page_632">[632]</span> are +speaking out like men, but they must have some support from Egypt. +Sir William sails to-day for Colombo. He writes from London that +Hayward is very ill, shut up in his room and hardly expected to +recover. Kinglake says of him: “He is too weak to hold his cards at +whist, but not too weak to d—— his partner.” I am sorry Chinese +Gordon goes to the Congo instead of the Nile.</p> + +<p><em>August</em> 1. Many thanks for the printed correspondence, +which is full of interest. I have been looking over your letters to +me of last year, and have copied the only passage relating to Mr. +Hamilton or Knowles, which I enclose. I would lay as little stress +as possible on the encouragement you had from Downing Street, as +the G.O.M. is capable of denying everything, and as much as +possible on the incontrovertible fact of your threatened arrest. I +hope the debate will come on soon. I was sure Mohammed Abdu would +create a good impression, between his graceful dress and his +graceful manner, which recalled Arabi’s. Mind you cultivate +Parnell, now you have broken the ice. He will be a great power in +the next Parliament, and his support will be worth a good deal.</p> + +<p>(Extract enclosed.) “<em>Sep.</em> 3, 1883. Both Knowles and +Button encourage me to try the elections, and say that Baring is +sure to be delighted to see me, and will perhaps help. It appears +he has <em>carte blanche</em> to make another new policy for the +Government, and as he is one of Lord Ripon’s strongest supporters +in India, it is supposed that he will favour Arabi’s return, or, at +any rate, the restoration of a National Party in some form or +other.”</p> + +<p>(Second extract enclosed) <em>Sep.</em> 21. “Everything up to +the moment has gone most prosperously. The morning we left I got a +note from Mr. Hamilton asking to see me before I went, and I +accordingly went, after nearly a year’s absence to Downing Street, +and found him very amiable. I told him exactly what I was going to +do, and he approved and said he was sure Baring would be very +pleased to see me, and that he would write to Lord Ripon’s private +secretary to do all he could for me in India. About Egypt I told +him I should try and get Baring to restore the National Party, but +unless he would help me it was quite useless my trying, and I +should not stay in Egypt. So I shall know as soon as I get to Cairo +whether it is possible or not. I am certain Gladstone wants to +restore, but wants to have his hand forced by a manifestation of +popular desire in Egypt.”</p> + +<p class="center space-above15 space-below1">(<em>From Sir William +Gregory.</em>)</p> + +<p>Coole, <em>Aug.</em> 24, 1884. I have read with great interest +Mohammed Abdu’s replies to his interviewer. They are very +valuable,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_633">[633]</span> and would +be ten times more so if anything could pierce the crust of our +English stupidity and self-complacency. But we have made up our +minds that the Egyptians whom we have been bombarding and +slaughtering ought to love us, and that if they don’t it is their +perversity, which only time and subjection can remove. I shall be +at Dalmeny on the 27th, and I daresay Gladstone will speak to me +about Egypt, but he has made up his mind about it, that all the +troubles of Egypt are due to military mutineers of whom Arabi was +the instigator; that Tewfik is a virtuous and enlightened young +prince to whom the honour of England is pledged, and that to secure +him as Khedive the exile of Arabi and his friends must be +maintained. You know how intolerant he is of a difference of +opinion. So I daresay he will not allow me even to make an +observation from a different point of view. I do not see how Arabi +is to return, but I am of opinion, were he permitted to do so, it +would be possible to establish a fairly decent Government in Egypt, +a far better one than ours has been, and which would, at all +events, suit the governed.</p> + +<p class="center space-above15 space-below1">(<em>From Sir William +Gregory.</em>)</p> + +<p>Coole, <em>Oct.</em> 5. Your second Indian article (on Race +Hatred) is admirable, and I fear too true. I had no idea things +were as bad as you describe, and I much fear there is little hope +of improvement. The only chance is the personal character of the +Viceroy and publicity. I wish our newspapers would take up the +subject. The English second and third-class women are, as you say, +the worst offenders. They are generally below their husbands, who +are elevated by education and responsibility, and make themselves +odious by their vulgarities and pretentions. The treatment of +natives in Ceylon is very different. There the civil servants are +generally very courteous and friendly with them, and there is no +doubt that a most kindly feeling subsists between the races. It is +not so, however, universally; in Colombo and Kandy the planters and +merchants’ clerks give themselves most offensive airs to natives, +but in the purely native districts the relations are excellent. I +hear from Indians that the contrast is remarkable, like going into +another hemisphere. Still things are not as they ought to be. A +young man of high native family constantly goes to Oxford and +Cambridge, and is there received as a friend and an equal, is asked +to all parties, and shares in all amusements. When he returns to +Ceylon he is not tabooed, it is true, but he knows he is looked +down upon as an inferior by merchants’ clerks and planters, +probably sons of pastrycooks and ladies’ maids. This I always +endeavoured to combat, and Sir Arthur Gordon is<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_634">[634]</span> doing the same. Mere civility +and want of rudeness is not enough. A native gentleman should be +made to feel that you regard him as your equal, in short, as an +Englishman. He thoroughly understands and resents condescending +civility. I am going to write to Dufferin, and to recommend your +article to him.</p> + +<p>The chances for Arabi and his friends are not encouraging. I +should like to see National bankruptcy proclaimed as an answer to +French threats.</p> + +<p class="center space-above15 space-below1">(<em>From Lady +Gregory.</em>)</p> + +<p>Coole, <em>March</em> 29, 1885.—I wish a better fight could have +been made on the Egyptian Convention. My only hope for Egypt now is +in the Mahdi. Osman Digna seems to be profiting by all the good +advice the “Times” has been giving him as to the best mode of +fighting.</p> + +<p><em>April</em> 14. We came here a little too soon and the +landscape looked as hard and dry as a Hobbema, but it is now as +soft and mysterious as a Corot. We spent last week in Dublin to +manifest our loyalty. The Royal visit has been so far a “great +success”—that is to say, the “foreign invaders” and also Lord +Spencer were cheered through the streets all through Dublin. +Whether that means much I can’t say; it is an excitable population +and I saw a man who walked through the cleared space carrying two +large band boxes cheered as much as anyone. “St. Patrick’s Day,” +when played at the laying of a foundation stone, was cheered more +than all; but the Prince was equal to the occasion and waved his +hat as if it was meant for him. The Princess looked very pretty and +not more than five-and-twenty at the ball in her white dress and +diamonds. The ball the prettiest sight I ever saw. . . . I feel as +if I had seen a crystallization of the pomps and vanities of the +wicked world. Enough of that for a long time.</p> + +<p>As an antidote I spent to-day in visiting some of our own poor +people. It is the best part of living in Ireland that they are +always bright and amusing and intelligent and witty. One old woman +asked me to come and see an old man. “He was a real gentleman,” she +said, “if I asked him for five or seven shillings he never said, ‘I +haven’t it,’ and if he went out to cut his corn he never raised his +back till the sun went down.” She also told me, “If I had a little +pig, I’d be in Heaven.” Another, I hope meaning a compliment, said +she had at first sight taken me for the priest’s sister and was +going to say, “How’s Father Considine?” Then, when she recognized +me, “Aren’t we happy to have such a plain lady?” You will be tired +of Ireland if I write any more.</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_635">[635]</span><em>May</em> +5.—What a terrible indictment your letter is against the +Government, and how well deserved! Sir William desires me to say he +goes with you in every word of it, which he does not always do. How +ignominiously the whole affair is ending! It’s a comfort to think +Wolseley won’t have a triumphal procession down Piccadilly this +time. I am very anxious to know what Randolph advises you and what +you make up your mind to about Parliament. I believe you would get +in as a Tory Democrat easily enough. You could hit hard enough at +the Government to please an English mob which enjoys hard-hitting +as a substitute for prize fights. The only good thing that has +reached me about the Prince’s visit is that one spectator at his +entry was heard to say to his neighbours, “I see a good many +Radical hats in the crowd.” “I suppose,” said the other, “a Radical +hat is a hat without a crown.”</p> + +<p><em>May</em> 15. Very many thanks for the sonnets and your long +letter. I knew you would be jubilant at the retreat and guessed you +had been working for it. What pleases me most is thinking of Lord +Wolseley having to eat his speech about the “hundred years,” and +also to think what a “cheer-up” this ignominious campaign must be +to Arabi in Ceylon. It was delightful your sending the sonnets to +Gladstone.</p> + +<p><em>June</em> (?). I suppose any change must be good (alluding +to the change of Government), and yet I don’t think the G. O. M. +has been sufficiently punished for his evil deeds. I hope Randolph +will hold to his present principles, as far as the East is +concerned, but the politician in and out of power is generally as +different as the patient Turkish peasant and the tyrannical Turkish +Pasha. As for you, you will never be able to support any +Government, but will always be in opposition.</p> + +<p><em>June</em> 19. Randolph for India! I can think of nothing +else; it amuses me so much the idea of Colvin’s face when he hears +it, and Lord Dufferin taking his orders from him, and Lord Reay, +who went out in the strength of Gladstone’s name. Will he be able +to do any good, I wonder? One must never expect too much of people +in office. Was it not delightful Arabi being cheered at St. James’s +Hall? It is rather hard being so far away from all the +excitement.</p> + +<p><em>July</em> 21. I thought I recognized B.’s hand in the +account of Wolseley’s reception. What a parade would have been made +if he had brought Gordon back! Lord Wolseley and Baring have told a +friend of mine that they look on Drummond-Wolff’s appointment as +disastrous for Egypt, which makes me hopeful, as do the letters (in +the “Times”) of the “Twenty years Resident in Egypt,” in which one +finds the flavour of Moberly Bell—“only the old sea-serpent done up +again.”</p> + +<p><span class="pagenum" id="Page_636">[636]</span><em>August</em> +14. I think you ought to write a sonnet on the Mahdi’s death. The +central idea about him to me is that he is the only man of the +nineteenth century who is known by his deeds and not at all by his +words. I wrote some lines myself, with which I herewith present +you, but not expecting compliments:</p> + +<div class="linegrp-container"> +<div class="linegrp"> +<div class="group"> +<div class="line indent0 center"><span class="sc">Sonnet on the +Mahdi’s Death</span> +</div> + +<div class="line indent0">The Guide of Islam, silent, strong, +world-known,</div> + +<div class="line indent0">Looked for peace won through battle’s +bloody fame,</div> + +<div class="line indent0">His brave, rash adversary now +o’erthrown</div> + +<div class="line indent0">Who blindly in the tyrant’s livery +came.</div> + +<div class="line indent0">His ally, his foe’s enemy, the Sun</div> + +<div class="line indent0">Had struck as if in scorn the parting +host,</div> + +<div class="line indent0">The task that made a nation almost +done,</div> + +<div class="line indent0">A people freed but at most cruel +cost.</div> + +<div class="line indent0">But hardly had he viewed the promised +land</div> + +<div class="line indent0">When blasting sickness came and struck +him low,</div> + +<div class="line indent0">And a scarred face was his and failing +hand</div> + +<div class="line indent0">Who was so mighty but an hour ago,</div> + +<div class="line indent0">And a hushed army round the dim tent +stood</div> + +<div class="line indent0">Wherein their Chief gave up his sword to +God.</div> +</div> +</div> +</div> + +<p>Write the sonnet yourself and use my last two lines, which I +confess to thinking good, and publish it in your name. I have a +feeling that something ought to be done to dignify the Mahdi’s +memory, such efforts have been made to vulgarize it.</p> + +<h3>II. <span class="sc">From Sir Alfred Lyall</span></h3> + +<div class="corr"> +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Nainee Tal, <em>May 21st</em>, 1883.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I must send a reply to your letter from Knebworth, though people +in England do not usually set much store by letters from India, +which is beyond the civilized world. What I want to say is that I +am very glad you are coming out to India to study the country—this +time; and that I much hope you will pay me a visit. I have some +rather extensive knowledge of Upper India, and of the leading +natives, so that I may be able to put you in the way of seeing +things as they are. In regard to the very curious point mentioned +in your letter, why Rajputs are (to use the technical words) +exogamous and Arabs endogamous, I can’t offer an explanation; save +only by saying that Islam overrides and sweeps away all the +obsolete prejudices of blood or caste that are at the bottom of +exogamy. Read McLennan, Morgan, and Maine—but<span class="pagenum" +id="Page_637">[637]</span> none of them will tell you exactly +whence comes the idea lying at the root of the term “incest,” +<em>i.e.</em>, the offence of marrying within certain prohibited +degrees.</p> + +<p>When you come out we will talk of Local Self-Government and the +native magistrates’ jurisdiction over Europeans. I am myself a +consistent liberal in these matters: I think, with you, that our +best chance of consolidating an Anglo-Indian empire out here lies +in abolishing privileges and bringing forward the leading natives +to political equality with ourselves. But we have been going so +long on the other tack that the operation of changing our course +has to be managed with a steady hand, and not too suddenly. Now +there has been a lack of political seamanship in high quarters; and +the vessel has got broadside to the wind, and has shipped a sea or +two; I think we shall get right soon, and I hope we shall not alter +our policy. But it must be always remembered that the whole +business of governing India is an experiment on a very large scale. +I always maintain that it has not been attempted, on this scale, +since the days of the Romans; and no one can yet decide whether the +policy of taking the natives into our confidence, or of keeping +them out of all real power, is the better for the <em>English</em>. +For myself, having to choose between two risks, I would select the +risk of letting in the native; though if we do this in a hurry we +may spoil everything, and provoke confusion, with a sanguinary +reaction—just as things went too fast and led to a premature crisis +in Egypt.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch5">Sincerely yours,</p> + +<p class="right">A. C. <span class="sc">Lyall</span>,</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">Camp, <em>January 16th</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>The foolish and violent article about you in the “Pioneer” of +this morning moves one’s indignation for more reasons than one. +These attacks all emanate, to my knowledge, from Calcutta.</p> + +<p>I have hitherto written nothing whatever to officials in these +provinces regarding your movements, as I believed you would prefer +this. But I shall now send word to Allygarh, and to the +Commissioner of Rohilcund, who is in political charge of Ranpore, +that it would be a total mistake to suppose that in these provinces +the Government takes any sinister view of your proceedings. I am +taking every opportunity of declaring that I know you to have no +intention whatever of propagating or encouraging disloyalty.</p> + +<p>I hope you will keep me informed of your fortunes.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">Very sincerely yours,</p> + +<p class="right">A. C. <span class="sc">Lyall</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_638">[638]</span>Lieut.-Governor’s Camp, N.W. Provinces,</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right"><em>November 8th</em>, 1884.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I am certainly doing what is possible on my part, to aid Amir +Hassan’s University project; but I fear he is beginning to discover +sundry difficulties, especially in the way of lukewarmness and +jealousies among his co-religionists. For myself, I am glad to +assist any measure that may tend to uplift the heads of the +Mohammedans of these parts. I am not at all afraid politically of +Islam in India; if they were at any time disposed to make +themselves troublesome, they would have to take the Hindus into +very serious account. I mention this because people are inclined to +have fits of vague panic about the Mussulmans. If the Russians ever +find it worth while to make a strong demonstration against India, +they would make a mistake in letting loose the Affghans upon us, +for that would throw into our hands all the fighting power and +enthusiasm of the Hindus. But I doubt the Affghans being so +shortsighted as to help the Russians across the Indus, as the +subjugation of Affghanistan would be the inevitable result of +Russian success. The “St. James’s Gazette” makes a great cry over +Macgregor’s “confidential” memorandum, which seems to have been +very freely circulated. I totally dissent from the notion that we +are on the brink of some great catastrophe; though it is certain +that our army is far too weak, and that we could not enter upon a +campaign against a European invader. These military chiefs know +little or nothing of the real state and temper of the Indian +people, or of the elements of internal trouble with which we have +to deal. And the articles in the “Times” upon the armies of Native +States are written upon second-rate information, and are likely to +be very mischievous if they have influence in high quarters.</p> + +<p>So much of Indian politics. I took no personal offence whatever +at your articles in the “Fortnightly.” They are not intended to be +pleasant to the Anglo-Indian official; and I may perhaps venture to +say that here and there they are unnecessarily unpleasant. But I do +not conceal my opinion, in discussing them out here, that there is +truth in much of what you say, though to my mind the paper on race +hatred is rather overstrained, and wants the strength of +moderation. I wish you had given your readers some momentary +glimpse of the other side of the shield. Nevertheless you have, as +I tell the folk here, given us much that is salutary criticism, and +there is no doubt that we Anglo-Indians are often a rough +unpicturesque development of the contact between East and West; +some of us finding ourselves rather too suddenly placed in +unfamiliar situations, and having emerged unexpectedly<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_639">[639]</span> into the fierce light that +beats upon office. On the other side, the Indians themselves do see +both sides of the shield, and do not object to abate much in the +matter of high politefulness, in consideration of a strong and +intelligent sort of administration, impartial among jarring races +and creeds. They are themselves not yet ready to supply this kind +of government, and they know its value. Also they know, much better +than most English, what a bad government, by exceedingly courteous +Asiatics, means. Moulvi Sami-ullah is just back from Egypt. I can +see that he is considerably impressed by the badness of +administrative institutions in Egypt; is rather inclined to +ridicule them. As for such very discreditable incidents as that of +Patna, they <em>must</em> occur now and then until the natives +themselves pluck up courage to hit back or otherwise violently +resent any personal insult. Laws and magistrates can do much, but +can never protect a whole people that does not stand up for itself. +Our magistrates are very fairly impartial between the two races in +Court; and the people are rather too fond of airing their +grievances in a helpless manner.</p> + +<p>However, Lord Ripon has done a good deal towards stirring up the +natives to a sense of independence and a desire to look after +themselves—they now begin to see that if they will only come +forward the English nation will meet them half way. Lord Dufferin +has but to let the leaven work, and not to give countenance to a +reaction.</p> + +<p>In Egypt I can anticipate nothing but complications. I cannot +see how we can possibly stand balancing as we do at present, +keeping everything in suspense, without some final stumble; and yet +it is becoming too late to withdraw. Probably our abandonment of +the Soudan (which I think is necessary) will heighten the +comparison and accelerate some crisis—the Soudan is just the +country that entangles the forces of a civilized State, and where +expeditions are as water poured into the sand.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">Yours sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right">A. C. <span class="sc">Lyall</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center">Lieut.-Governor’s Camp, North-West Provinces, +India.</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right"><em>February 23rd</em>, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I am very sorry that my prediction as to the Soudan, quoted in +your letter to me of Jan. 23rd, seems likely to be verified, as +well as many predictions made by you. Never was such a demented +policy followed so blindly to inevitable failure and disrepute, in +open disregard of all the warnings of our Oriental experience, as +that we see still being pursued in Egypt. However, I find, to +my<span class="pagenum" id="Page_640">[640]</span> great relief, +that the <em>contre coup</em> of our Egyptian blunders is not much +felt in India, where they are mostly indifferent to the Mahdi and +to our proceedings generally, though of course there is much talk +of our unlucky adventures in that country. The Mahomedan generally +is mainly interested in the Sultan; and Upper India keeps its eyes +fixed on Affghanistan and on Russia’s doings in Central Asia.</p> + +<p>I have just read your “Fortnightly” article on Hyderabad +affairs, which article will, you fear, entirely finish Lord +Lytton’s regard for you. I think, on the contrary, that he ought to +be very much obliged to you; for instead of laying upon the Viceroy +the whole burden of your displeasure at Salar Jung’s treatment in +1876-77-78, you have discharged all your wrath upon that anonymous +bureau that you call the Calcutta Foreign Office. Not Lord Lytton, +it appears, but poor little Tommy Thornton, who acted as Foreign +Secretary at that time, and whom Lord Lytton treated with scant +ceremony, was the author of the policy of curbing Salar Jung. I +observe that throughout your paper you denounce and convict of the +highest crimes the Calcutta Foreign Office, and that the Viceroys +and Governor-Generals are represented as sinning mainly by +inadvertence. This peculiar tactic was introduced by the +“Statesman” newspaper, and is intelligible in a journal that +selects an antagonist who cannot hit back when attacked; for of +course the Foreign Office, being impersonal and bound to secrecy, +is dumb. I tried to induce Lord Ripon to let me roll over the +“Statesman” when it once libelled me directly, but he wouldn’t let +me use confidential papers. I should hardly have expected, however, +that so fearless and honourable an adversary as yourself would have +adopted the same method.</p> + +<p>I suppose I ought not to see anything comic in being accused of +being “even more absolutely without moral scruple than” an English +Foreign Secretary, or in reading that the history of the doings of +the Calcutta Foreign Office, with which I was long connected about +the time of which you are treating, is one of the most scandalous +in diplomatic annals; that the Calcutta Foreign Office deliberately +encouraged the Nizam in vice and dissipation in order to retain +power in his state; and, finally, that it is indirectly responsible +for Salar Jung being poisoned; but the situation is so novel that +its ridiculous side most moves me. It seems clear to me that you +are <em>not</em> behind the scenes, or you would see the thing in +the same comic light; for it is quite in my power to prove that all +these wild accusations against gentlemen who are just like yourself +in honour and integrity, are unfounded and erroneous. You must not +reply that you are attacking a system, or a department, not +individuals; the policy of the Indian Foreign Office is +distinctly<span class="pagenum" id="Page_641">[641]</span> directed +by the individuals, the Viceroy and his Foreign Secretary, from +time to time in office. And when you write that the policy of the +Calcutta Foreign Office is one of organized aggression with a view +to annexation—a policy carried on, you imply, in despite of +well-meaning Governors-General—you are not only wrong, but the +reverse is far nearer the truth. Take the instance of Berar, it is +demonstrable by published papers that the attempt to annex and the +whole policy of seizure was entirely Lord Dalhousie’s own. With +Lord Dalhousie’s departure the whole process of annexation (except +for rebellion) ceased some thirty years ago; his annexations were +rather opposed than supported by the local officials: and I +challenge you to bring an instance in which the Calcutta Foreign +Office has since advocated Indian annexations. In regard to the +assertion for which, to my amazement, you vouch on your personal +testimony, that the Calcutta Foreign Office is responsible for +attempts made to corrupt the Nizam’s youth, I am quite sure you +could not prove it, for I know I could prove the contrary.</p> + +<p>I hope you will ponder these words, and consider whether such +very serious charges ought to be made, except when you are face to +face with men who can answer, or except when you actually produce, +as you do nowhere in your article, the evidence on which you +rely.</p> + +<p>Lord R. Churchill stayed with me two days. I liked him much: he +seemed reasonable and moderate, and open-minded upon all Indian +questions. India is moving forward very fast—whither, the gods +alone know; or perhaps the gods are moving forward themselves too +fast to have much time for speculation on anything but their own +future. The Russian scare acts as a drag upon Indian radicalism; +the advanced party does not want to let in Russia, and is beginning +to perceive that only the English can keep her out long.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch6">I am yours sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right">A. C. <span class="sc">Lyall</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<p class="center">Lieut.-Governor’s Camp, N.W. Provinces, +India.</p> + +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right"><em>May 4th</em>, 1885.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">My dear Blunt</span>,</p> + +<p>I was very glad to see from your letter of March 25th, that you +are quite ready to exchange explanations upon the disputable points +in your article to which our correspondence refers. I will not go +farther into the entangled questions of Hyderabad politics, except +to say that I am prepared, if necessary, absolutely to prove all +that I have averred. For example, I will prove that I, +as<span class="pagenum" id="Page_642">[642]</span> Foreign +Secretary, wrote letters insisting that greater care should be +taken of the young Nizam’s training and education, and that I +pressed the point orally and by writing much more closely than Sir +Salar Jung quite liked. Also I can prove, undeniably, that at my +instance the Government of India proposed to bring to an issue the +“Statesman” attacks upon Sir R. Meade by authorizing, indeed +ordering, Sir R. Meade to prosecute the “Statesman” in London. It +was the <em>India Office</em> which refused to allow the +prosecution; the Calcutta Foreign Office and Meade were quite ready +and resolute. But I cannot quote documents, much less publish them, +without the consent of the Foreign Office and the India Office, so +I cannot answer public attacks.</p> + +<p>As you write in such friendly strain you will perhaps excuse me +for expressing regret that the force and benefit of your articles +on Indian affairs should be so much diminished (as they really are) +by incautious use of unverified information. I have nothing +whatever to say against the position you take up as an advanced +Liberal and a Reformer in Indian politics, though I may not agree +with all your views, or as to ways, means, and opportunities of +reform: but it seems to me that your ends would be more likely to +be met if you assumed a more impartial attitude. You will never +persuade the English nation that Anglo-Indian officials are all +fools or knaves. You were quite right to quote my letter in writing +to the India Office. I intended it as a manifesto on your side, but +I should guess you could afford to pass by Lepel Griffin. He is +down on his luck just now, having lost the Foreign Secretaryship, +and having been excluded from Raoulpindi Durbar, and he is +consequently very sore indeed after such a tumble. I am inclined to +be sorry for him as he is an able fellow in his way; but never did +man more completely write himself down. He has a vaunting and +exaggerated style that irritates people generally, and alarms the +cautious officials in high places. His letter in the “Times” (early +in April) for instance, about his having been intimately acquainted +with one hundred ruling princes of India, is absurd grandiloquence; +he only knows half a dozen worth mention politically.</p> + +<p>It is hardly worth while that I should write to you about the +present state of Indian feeling; for I fear you agree with Lord R. +Churchill’s dictum that the English official knows less than +nothing about what the natives think. Nevertheless, I may say that +to me the Indian people at large appears to have come out +wonderfully well during the critical suspense we have been going +through as to war or peace with Russia. If war came, I believe we +should have the country well behind us, and supporting us against +the Russians, and I have little fear of internal tumults or +disorders<span class="pagenum" id="Page_643">[643]</span> so long +as we hold our own beyond or on the North-West frontier. The +Russians are, I think, entirely mistaken in their notion that they +could stir up any trouble against us in India, where, on the +contrary, they have a very bad reputation; and I fancy the natives +do not worry themselves so much as you imagine about our +bureaucratic manners and blunders, so long as they feel they have a +strong and honest government to keep the peace and keep out +invaders. This is not, of course, the view of the advanced Liberal +native, who naturally wants to rise, but the great Conservative +propertied classes have this feeling just now.</p> + +<p>I thought war was coming. Russia gave us a fair challenge by +seizing Panjdeh; but now I suspect that Gladstone is only easing us +down, and had never any intention of incurring more +bloodguiltiness. His foreign policy has been most unlucky. He +evidently has no head for this part of government, and his dealings +with the Soudan have been lamentable. Apparently he will fulfil +your prediction that “it will end by their absconding without +making any arrangements at all.”</p> + +<p>I wish you would stand for a good Radical constituency and join +John Morley. I believe you are at heart much nearer the extreme +left than the extreme right; and you could arrange to say nothing +about the game laws until you had saved your common country, +abolished the Foreign Office and the Indian Council, and given +India a dozen provincial parliaments. Sincerely yours,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">A. C. <span class="sc">Lyall</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<h3><a id="appg3"></a>III. <span class="sc">Lieut.-General Gloag to +Mr. Blunt</span></h3> + +<div class="corr"> +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right pad-rightch4">2, Tanfield Court, Inner Temple, +E.C.</p> + +<p class="right"><em>August 19th</em>, 1886.</p> +</div> + +<p class="salut"><span class="sc">Dear Sir</span>,</p> + +<p>I read your letter in the “Times” of yesterday with great +satisfaction, on the subject of Burmah. As I have been all over +that country, I know a great deal about it, and will not fail from +time to time, as heretofore, to do my best to expose those who have +befooled Lord Dufferin.</p> + +<p>1. Inquiry must be held into the real causes of the +Annexation.</p> + +<p>2. I long ago pointed out that Young Thibô, reputed son of the +late King Mengdom Meng, was neither a drunkard nor a debauchee, nor +yet cruel. Sir Grant Duff can tell now what he is, as he has had +him in charge.</p> + +<p>3. An inquiry must be held into the method of making the +Contracts entered into by Mengdom Meng with the Bombay Burmah +Trading Company <em>in re</em> the Teak Forests; and maps and plans +of<span class="pagenum" id="Page_644">[644]</span> the forests +furnished, as also the number of trees cut down, and the number of +young trees planted.</p> + +<p>4. A general inquiry into the conditions of trade in force +between us and the late Mengdom Meng, for the present King Thibô is +a mere youth, crassly ignorant of most things.</p> + +<p>I fully anticipate that independent members will take the +question up in the House, and you should do your utmost to help +them as I also will do. I wrote long ago (1878) that annexation was +wrong commercially and morally, as well as quite unnecessary. A +strong Resident, well supported, with a well-appointed +establishment should have been located at Mandalay in 1879 when +Mengdom Meng died, the slave question for ever settled, and order +made to prevail, and the laws remodelled and respected—quietly; if +not, under gentle but strong means. I shall be glad to see you +continuing along the paths of reason, truth, honesty and justice in +this matter.</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right pad-rightch20">Yours sincerely,</p> + +<p class="right">A. K. <span class="sc">Gloag</span>, +Lieut.-General, late Comr. R.A. in British Burmah.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<div class="corr"> +<div class="rdate"> +<p class="right">National Liberal Club, <em>August 25th</em>, +1886.</p> +</div> + +<p class="tb">* * * * * *</p> + +<p>The whole affair has been a monstrous wicked thing <em>ab +initio</em>. I did write to the “Times,” but probably my letters +were more truthful than they would have been agreeable to the +mercantile bodies at Calcutta and Rangoon who I believe have been +in the main the sole cause of our policy in Burmah. Yours +truly,</p> + +<div class="signright"> +<p class="right">A. K. <span class="sc">Gloag</span>.</p> +</div> +</div> + +<hr class="chap"> + +<h2 class="large"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_645">[645]</span><a id="ind"></a>INDEX</h2> + +<p class="less space-below15"><em>For the convenience of readers +the public position of each principal person here named is given +with a biography in brief.</em> +</p> + +<ul class="index"> +<li><span class="dcaplarge">A</span>ARIF, MOHAMMED BEY, <a href= +"#Page_326">326</a>, <a href="#Page_330">330</a>, <a href= +"#Page_332">332</a>, <a href="#Page_333">333</a>, <a href= +"#Page_334">334</a>, <a href="#Page_339">339</a>.</li> + +<li>Abbas, Khedive, the present, proposal of appointing him still a +minor with a Regency, <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href= +"#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href= +"#appb">Appendix B</a>.</li> + +<li>Abbasi, Sheykh Mohammed el, Sheykh-el-Islam at Cairo, <a href= +"#Page_70">70</a>.</li> + +<li>Abd-el-Aal Pasha, fellah Colonel, exiled with Arabi, <a href= +"#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href= +"#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_276">276</a>, <a href= +"#Page_323">323</a>, <a href="#appf">Appendix F</a>.</li> + +<li>Abd-el-Kader Pasha, Governor of the Soudan in 1882, reason of +his refusing to return there in 1884, <a href="#appa">Appendix +A</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href= +"#Page_16">16</a>, <a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href= +"#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_170">170</a>, <a href= +"#Page_171">171</a>, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href= +"#Page_208">208</a>.</li> + +<li>Abd-el-Mutalleb, Sherif of Mecca, <a href= +"#Page_333">333</a>.</li> + +<li>Abd-el-Rahman, Amir of Afghanistan, <a href= +"#Page_264">264</a>, <a href="#Page_396">396</a>, <a href= +"#Page_397">397</a>, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>, <a href= +"#Page_444">444</a>, <a href="#Page_466">466</a>.</li> + +<li>Abd-el-Rasul, of Cashmere, <a href="#Page_494">494</a>, +<a href="#Page_500">500</a>.</li> + +<li>Abd-el-Razak Bey, F.R.G.S., ex-director of Naval College, +imprisoned at Cairo in 1883, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href= +"#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#appf">Appendix F</a>.</li> + +<li>Abdallah-el-Taishi, the Khalifa, successor to the Mahdi, +<a href="#Page_505">505</a>.</li> + +<li>Abdallah Ibn Saoud, Nejdi, living at Constantinople, <a href= +"#Page_327">327</a>.</li> + +<li>Abdu, Sheykh Mohammed, religious reformer, afterwards Egyptian +Grand Mufti, living in exile at Paris in 1884, <a href= +"#Page_208">208</a>, <a href="#Page_284">284</a>, <a href= +"#Page_286">286</a>; in England in 1884, <a href= +"#Page_270">270</a>; interviewed for “Pall Mall Gazette,” <a href= +"#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="#appe">Appendix E</a>; author’s +correspondence with, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, <a href= +"#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>, <a href= +"#Page_284">284</a>, <a href="#Page_286">286</a>, <a href= +"#appb">Appendix B</a>; at the House of Commons, <a href= +"#Page_272">272</a>; his talk with Labouchere and Lawson, <a href= +"#Page_273">273</a>; with Churchill, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, +<a href="#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>, <a href= +"#Page_208">208</a>, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>, <a href= +"#Page_219">219</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href= +"#Page_270">270</a>, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>, <a href= +"#Page_272">272</a>, <a href="#Page_273">273</a>, <a href= +"#Page_274">274</a>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>, <a href= +"#Page_276">276</a>, <a href="#Page_278">278</a>.</li> + +<li>Abdul Aziz, Ottoman Sultan, <a href="#Page_329">329</a>, +<a href="#Page_339">339</a>.</li> + +<li>Abdul Hamid, Ottoman Sultan, his character, <a href= +"#Page_238">238</a>, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>, <a href= +"#Page_308">308</a>, <a href="#Page_309">309</a>, <a href= +"#Page_317">317</a>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>, <a href= +"#Page_326">326</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>, <a href= +"#Page_328">328</a>, <a href="#Page_337">337</a>, <a href= +"#Page_338">338</a>; he favours Halim, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>, +<a href="#Page_321">321</a>; his spies, <a href= +"#Page_309">309</a>; “un misérable et un fou,” <a href= +"#Page_309">309</a>; his horses, <a href="#Page_303">303</a>, +<a href="#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="#Page_341">341</a>, <a href= +"#Page_389">389</a>; his Selamlik, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>; his +attitude towards the Grand Duke Nicholas, <a href= +"#Page_308">308</a>; he only trusts the Germans, <a href= +"#Page_322">322</a>, <a href="#Page_333">333</a>; his relations +with Dufferin, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>, <a href= +"#Page_303">303</a>, <a href="#Page_305">305</a>, <a href= +"#Page_322">322</a>, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>; with other +ambassadors, <a href="#Page_305">305</a>, <a href= +"#Page_316">316</a>, <a href="#Page_317">317</a>, <a href= +"#Page_322">322</a>; his manœuvres, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>; +his women, <a href="#Page_329">329</a>, <a href= +"#Page_337">337</a>; his dislike of the ex-Khedive Ismaïl, <a href= +"#Page_378">378</a>, <a href="#Page_447">447</a>; author’s letter +to, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>, <a href="#Page_389">389</a>, +<a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>; proposed revolt against in 1885, +<a href="#Page_490">490</a>, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>, <a href= +"#Page_493">493</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, +<a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href= +"#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href= +"#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href= +"#Page_208">208</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>, <a href= +"#Page_242">242</a>, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>, <a href= +"#Page_301">301</a>, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>, <a href= +"#Page_303">303</a>, <a href="#Page_304">304</a>, <a href= +"#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="#Page_306">306</a>, <a href= +"#Page_307">307</a>, <a href="#Page_308">308</a>, <a href= +"#Page_309">309</a>, <a href="#Page_310">310</a>, <a href= +"#Page_311">311</a>, <a href="#Page_312">312</a>, <a href= +"#Page_314">314</a>, <a href="#Page_321">321</a>, <a href= +"#Page_322">322</a>, <a href="#Page_329">329</a>, <a href= +"#Page_332">332</a>, <a href="#Page_333">333</a>,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_646">[646]</span> <a href="#Page_338">338</a>, +<a href="#Page_339">339</a>, <a href="#Page_340">340</a>, <a href= +"#Page_341">341</a>, <a href="#Page_358">358</a>, <a href= +"#Page_361">361</a>, <a href="#Page_363">363</a>, <a href= +"#Page_365">365</a>, <a href="#Page_366">366</a>, <a href= +"#Page_367">367</a>, <a href="#Page_368">368</a>, <a href= +"#Page_375">375</a>, <a href="#Page_378">378</a>, <a href= +"#Page_387">387</a>, <a href="#Page_398">398</a>, <a href= +"#Page_399">399</a>, <a href="#Page_403">403</a>, <a href= +"#Page_405">405</a>, <a href="#Page_417">417</a>, <a href= +"#Page_418">418</a>, <a href="#Page_434">434</a>, <a href= +"#Page_436">436</a>, <a href="#Page_441">441</a>, <a href= +"#Page_449">449</a>, <a href="#Page_451">451</a>, <a href= +"#Page_454">454</a>, <a href="#Page_455">455</a>, <a href= +"#Page_474">474</a>, <a href="#Page_475">475</a>, <a href= +"#Page_476">476</a>, <a href="#Page_477">477</a>, <a href= +"#Page_480">480</a>, <a href="#Page_485">485</a>, <a href= +"#Page_486">486</a>, <a href="#Page_487">487</a>, <a href= +"#Page_488">488</a>, <a href="#Page_492">492</a>, <a href= +"#Page_501">501</a>.</li> + +<li>Abu Diab, Yusuf Bey, aide-de-camp to Abd-el-Aal, unjustly +hanged at Tantah, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href= +"#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href= +"#Page_325">325</a>, <a href="#Page_335">335</a>, <a href= +"#appb">Appendices B</a> and <a href="#appf">F.</a></li> + +<li>“Abu Naddara,” an Arabic journal published at Paris. +<em>See</em> Sanua.</li> + +<li>Adhem, Ibrahim Bey, adherent of Tewfik and Mudir of Tantah, his +responsibility for the massacres at Tantah, <a href= +"#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_324">324</a>, <a href= +"#Page_325">325</a>, <a href="#Page_335">335</a>. <em>Also</em> +<a href="#appb">Appendices B</a> and <a href="#appf">F.</a></li> + +<li>Ahmed Assad, Sheykh, secret agent of the Sultan sent to Egypt +in 1882, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>.</li> + +<li>Ahmed, Mohammed. <em>See</em> the Mahdi.</li> + +<li>Ala-ed-Din Pasha, adherent of Tewfik, appointed +Governor-General of Soudan in 1883, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>.</li> + +<li>Aleysh, Sheykh Mohammed el, Sheykh of the Malekite rite at +Cairo, imprisoned by Tewfik in 1882, and died in prison, <a href= +"#Page_81">81</a>.</li> + +<li>Alexandria, bombardment of, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href= +"#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>; riots at, <a href= +"#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href= +"#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href= +"#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>. <em>Also</em> +<a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>.</li> + +<li>Amir Ali, Mr. Justice, now member of Privy Council, <a href= +"#Page_242">242</a>, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>.</li> + +<li>Ali Fehmi Pasha, fellah Colonel of the Guards, A.D.C. to +Khedive, exiled with Arabi, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href= +"#Page_276">276</a>, <a href="#Page_324">324</a>.</li> + +<li>Ali Yusuf Bey, traitor at Tel-el-Kebir, <a href= +"#Page_275">275</a>, <a href="#Page_323">323</a>.</li> + +<li>Allnatt, Mrs., <a href="#Page_387">387</a>; correspondence +with, <a href="#appa">Appendix A</a>.</li> + +<li>Amir Hassan, Rajah of Mahmudabad, <a href="#Page_297">297</a>, +<a href="#Page_413">413</a>.</li> + +<li>Amnesty promised by Dufferin in 1882, but broken in 1883, +<a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#appc">Appendix C</a>.</li> + +<li>Anderson, Mary, Miss, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>, <a href= +"#Page_420">420</a>.</li> + +<li>Appleton, Mr., <a href="#Page_353">353</a>.</li> + +<li>Arab race at Newmarket, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>, <a href= +"#Page_263">263</a>, <a href="#Page_264">264</a>, <a href= +"#Page_265">265</a>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>; at Cairo, +<a href="#Page_315">315</a>.</li> + +<li>Arab studs in Poland, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>, <a href= +"#Page_295">295</a>, <a href="#Page_296">296</a>.</li> + +<li>Arabi, Ahmed Pasha, leader of the Egyptian revolution of 1882, +his recall to Egypt contemplated, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href= +"#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href= +"#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href= +"#Page_42">42</a>; Gordon’s opinion of, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>; +his memorandum sent to Dufferin, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, +<a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href= +"#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>; his views on the +Soudan, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>, <a href="#Page_35">35</a>, +<a href="#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href= +"#appe">Appendix E</a>; author’s correspondence with, <a href= +"#appb">Appendix B</a>; account of his behaviour at Tel-el-Kebir, +<a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_323">323</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, +<a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href= +"#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href= +"#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href= +"#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href= +"#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href= +"#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href= +"#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href= +"#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href= +"#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href= +"#Page_53">53</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href= +"#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href= +"#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href= +"#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href= +"#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href= +"#Page_98">98</a>, <a href="#Page_140">140</a>, <a href= +"#Page_170">170</a>, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>, <a href= +"#Page_212">212</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href= +"#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>, <a href= +"#Page_230">230</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href= +"#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>, <a href= +"#Page_238">238</a>, <a href="#Page_242">242</a>, <a href= +"#Page_245">245</a>, <a href="#Page_246">246</a>, <a href= +"#Page_249">249</a>, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>, <a href= +"#Page_253">253</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href= +"#Page_257">257</a>, <a href="#Page_260">260</a>, <a href= +"#Page_268">268</a>, <a href="#Page_270">270</a>, <a href= +"#Page_276">276</a>, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>, <a href= +"#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="#Page_310">310</a>, <a href= +"#Page_313">313</a>, <a href="#Page_323">323</a>, <a href= +"#Page_325">325</a>, <a href="#Page_379">379</a>, <a href= +"#Page_381">381</a>, <a href="#Page_387">387</a>, <a href= +"#Page_440">440</a>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>, <a href= +"#Page_461">461</a>, <a href="#Page_477">477</a>, <a href= +"#Page_503">503</a>.</li> + +<li>Argyll, Duke of, <a href="#Page_437">437</a>, <a href= +"#Page_450">450</a>, <a href="#Page_456">456</a>.</li> + +<li>Armenia, <a href="#Page_337">337</a>, <a href= +"#Page_338">338</a>, <a href="#Page_342">342</a>.</li> + +<li>Atlee, Mr. Falconer, Consul at Paris, <a href= +"#Page_284">284</a>, <a href="#Page_289">289</a>.</li> + +<li>Austin, Alfred, Poet Laureate, friend of the author, <a href= +"#Page_392">392</a>.</li> + +<li>Awwam, Effendi, Arabi’s secretary, said to have betrayed +Gordon, <a href="#Page_421">421</a>, <a href="#appc">Appendix +C</a>.</li> + +<li><span class="pagenum" id="Page_647">[647]</span>Azarian, +Monseigneur, Patriarch of the Catholic Armenians at Constantinople, +<a href="#Page_337">337</a>; his opinion of Sultan Abdul Hamid, +<a href="#Page_338">338</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Baker, Sir Samuel, well-known traveller, preceded +Gordon as Governor of Equatorial Province of the Nile, <a href= +"#Page_95">95</a>, <a href="#Page_97">97</a>; his high salary, +<a href="#Page_100">100</a>; his letter to the “Times” of <a href= +"#Page_1">1</a>st January, 1884, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>; +Gordon’s visit to, in 1884, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_100">100</a>, <a href= +"#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_104">104</a>, <a href= +"#Page_153">153</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href= +"#Page_171">171</a>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href= +"#Page_176">176</a>.</li> + +<li>Baker, Valentine Pasha, brother of Sir Samuel, head of Egyptian +gendarmerie, formerly Colonel of the 10th Hussars, <a href= +"#Page_201">201</a>; his defeat at Teb, 5th February, <a href= +"#Page_203">203</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, +<a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href= +"#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>, <a href= +"#Page_201">201</a>, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>, <a href= +"#Page_203">203</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>; author’s personal +recollection of, <a href="#Page_201">201</a>.</li> + +<li>Bakir, Mirza, exiled Persian Sufi living in London, <a href= +"#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>; engaged as +Oriental secretary to author, <a href="#Page_276">276</a>, <a href= +"#Page_499">499</a>.</li> + +<li>Balfour, Arthur, Rt. Hon., M.P., afterwards Prime Minister, +<a href="#Page_410">410</a>, <a href="#Page_424">424</a>, <a href= +"#Page_435">435</a>, <a href="#Page_450">450</a>.</li> + +<li>Bannerman, Henry Campbell-, Rt. Hon. Sir, M.P., Undersecretary +at the Admiralty, afterwards Prime Minister, his strange denial in +the Palmer case, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>.</li> + +<li>Barnes, Rev. Dr., vicar of Heavitree, Gordon’s religious +adviser, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>, <a href="#Page_139">139</a>, +<a href="#Page_171">171</a>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>.</li> + +<li>Baring, Sir Evelyn. <em>See</em> Cromer.</li> + +<li>Barttelot, Sir Walter, M.P., <a href="#Page_489">489</a>.</li> + +<li>Belkis, Queen, <a href="#Page_314">314</a>.</li> + +<li>Bell, Moberly, Mr., “Times” correspondent at Alexandria, +<a href="#Page_348">348</a>; same as “Twenty Years’ Resident,” +<a href="#Page_456">456</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#appg">Appendix +G</a>.</li> + +<li>Beresford, Charles, Admiral Lord, M.P., <a href= +"#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_365">365</a>.</li> + +<li>Berzati, Gordon’s secretary in the Soudan, afterwards killed +with Hicks, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>.</li> + +<li>Bible, Gordon’s, correspondence about the recovery of, <a href= +"#Page_387">387</a>, <a href="#Page_389">389</a>, <a href= +"#appa">Appendix A</a>.</li> + +<li>Bilgrami, Seyd Huseyn, afterwards member of the Indian Council, +<a href="#Page_371">371</a>.</li> + +<li>“Bitters,” Francis Gore Currie, author’s cousin living in +Paris, <a href="#Page_284">284</a>, <a href="#Page_287">287</a>, +<a href="#Page_410">410</a>.</li> + +<li>Bismarck, Prince, author’s recollection of, <a href= +"#Page_286">286</a>; his connection with the Rothschilds, <a href= +"#Page_260">260</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, <a href= +"#Page_395">395</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, +<a href="#Page_220">220</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>, <a href= +"#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_260">260</a>, <a href= +"#Page_262">262</a>, <a href="#Page_345">345</a>, <a href= +"#Page_350">350</a>, <a href="#Page_357">357</a>, <a href= +"#Page_371">371</a>, <a href="#Page_391">391</a>, <a href= +"#Page_394">394</a>, <a href="#Page_395">395</a>, <a href= +"#Page_400">400</a>.</li> + +<li>Bismarck, Count Herbert, <a href="#Page_395">395</a>.</li> + +<li>Black Art, the, <a href="#Page_259">259</a>.</li> + +<li>Blignières, M. de, French Financial Controller in Egypt, +<a href="#Page_51">51</a>.</li> + +<li>Blind, Karl, German revolutionist living in exile in London, +<a href="#Page_354">354</a>, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>.</li> + +<li>Blount, Sir Edward, formerly British Consul at Paris, <a href= +"#Page_389">389</a>.</li> + +<li>Bourke, Rt. Hon. Robert, M.P., Under-Secretary of State for +Foreign Affairs, afterwards Lord Connemara, Governor of Madras, +<a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_220">220</a>, <a href= +"#Page_226">226</a>, <a href="#Page_278">278</a>, <a href= +"#Page_349">349</a>, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>, <a href= +"#Page_450">450</a>.</li> + +<li>Bowen, Lord Justice, <a href="#Page_451">451</a>.</li> + +<li>Bowles, Thomas Gibson, M.P., editor of “Vanity Fair,” <a href= +"#Page_343">343</a>, <a href="#Page_361">361</a>, <a href= +"#Page_369">369</a>.</li> + +<li>Brand, Hon. Henry, M.P., Surveyor-General of the Ordnance, +1883-1885, afterwards 2nd<span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_648">[648]</span> Viscount Hampden and Governor of New South +Wales, friend of the author, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>, <a href= +"#Page_239">239</a>, <a href="#Page_241">241</a>, <a href= +"#Page_247">247</a>, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>, <a href= +"#Page_249">249</a>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href= +"#Page_259">259</a>, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>, <a href= +"#Page_443">443</a>, <a href="#Page_446">446</a>, <a href= +"#Page_452">452</a>.</li> + +<li>Brett, Hon. Reginald, M.P., private secretary to Lord +Hartington, afterwards Lord Esher, his friendship with Gordon, +<a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href= +"#Page_150">150</a>; his connection with the press, <a href= +"#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_164">164</a>. <em>Also</em> +<a href="#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="#Page_174">174</a>, <a href= +"#Page_227">227</a>, <a href="#Page_351">351</a>, <a href= +"#Page_369">369</a>, <a href="#Page_375">375</a>.</li> + +<li>Broadley, Mr. A. M., Arabi’s Counsel in 1882, <a href= +"#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>, <a href= +"#Page_270">270</a>; his connection with the ex-Khedive Ismaïl, +<a href="#Page_353">353</a>.</li> + +<li>Brocklehurst, General, intimate friend of Gordon, <a href= +"#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="#Page_174">174</a>; author’s talk +with, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>.</li> + +<li>Brodrick, Rt. Hon. St. John, M.P., afterwards Lord Midleton and +Chief Secretary for India, <a href="#Page_494">494</a>.</li> + +<li>Buckle, Mr. G. E., editor of the “Times” in succession to Mr. +Chenery, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, +<a href="#Page_220">220</a>, <a href="#Page_250">250</a>, <a href= +"#Page_271">271</a>, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>, <a href= +"#Page_367">367</a>.</li> + +<li>Buller, General Sir Redvers, <a href="#Page_379">379</a>, +<a href="#Page_384">384</a>.</li> + +<li>“Bungo,” the Hon. Sir Michael Herbert, of the Paris Embassy, +afterwards Ambassador at Washington, friend of the author, <a href= +"#Page_387">387</a>.</li> + +<li>Burmese War, <a href="#Page_497">497</a>, <a href= +"#Page_498">498</a>, <a href="#Page_499">499</a>, <a href= +"#Page_501">501</a>, <a href="#Page_502">502</a>, <a href= +"#Page_503">503</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#appg">Appendix G</a>; +author protests against, <a href="#Page_502">502</a>.</li> + +<li>Burnaby, Colonel Fred, author of “The Ride to Khiva,” <a href= +"#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>; killed at Abu +Klea, <a href="#Page_362">362</a>, <a href= +"#Page_406">406</a>.</li> + +<li>Burne, Sir Owen, head of the Secret Department at India Office, +<a href="#Page_250">250</a>.</li> + +<li>Burt, Rt. Hon. Thomas, M.P., working man member, <a href= +"#Page_248">248</a>, <a href="#Page_428">428</a>.</li> + +<li>Burton, Sir Richard, the well-known explorer, <a href= +"#Page_101">101</a>; Gordon’s letter to, <a href= +"#Page_137">137</a>.</li> + +<li>Burton, Lady, Gordon’s letter to, <a href= +"#Page_130">130</a>.</li> + +<li>Butler, General Sir William, in command of the garrison at +Alexandria, his testimony about the bombardment of Alexandria, +<a href="#Page_475">475</a>; as to Gordon’s being refused +permission to land in Egypt, <a href="#Page_146">146</a>.</li> + +<li>Butros Pasha Ghali, Coptic Notable, afterwards Prime Minister +in Egypt, assassinated in 1910, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>.</li> + +<li>“Button,” Hon. Algernon Bourke, on the staff of the “Times,” +cousin and friend of the author, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, +<a href="#Page_209">209</a>, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>, <a href= +"#Page_212">212</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <a href= +"#Page_216">216</a>, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, <a href= +"#Page_220">220</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>, <a href= +"#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>, <a href= +"#Page_226">226</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>, <a href= +"#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>, <a href= +"#Page_231">231</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href= +"#Page_236">236</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>, <a href= +"#Page_241">241</a>, <a href="#Page_242">242</a>, <a href= +"#Page_243">243</a>, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>, <a href= +"#Page_248">248</a>, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>, <a href= +"#Page_250">250</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href= +"#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>, <a href= +"#Page_259">259</a>, <a href="#Page_260">260</a>, <a href= +"#Page_261">261</a>, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>, <a href= +"#Page_264">264</a>, <a href="#Page_269">269</a>, <a href= +"#Page_283">283</a>, <a href="#Page_352">352</a>, <a href= +"#Page_359">359</a>, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>, <a href= +"#Page_361">361</a>, <a href="#Page_363">363</a>, <a href= +"#Page_364">364</a>, <a href="#Page_365">365</a>, <a href= +"#Page_367">367</a>, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>, <a href= +"#Page_370">370</a>, <a href="#Page_371">371</a>, <a href= +"#Page_372">372</a>, <a href="#Page_373">373</a>, <a href= +"#Page_375">375</a>, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>, <a href= +"#Page_384">384</a>, <a href="#Page_385">385</a>, <a href= +"#Page_389">389</a>, <a href="#Page_391">391</a>, <a href= +"#Page_393">393</a>, <a href="#Page_394">394</a>, <a href= +"#Page_395">395</a>, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>, <a href= +"#Page_402">402</a>, <a href="#Page_406">406</a>, <a href= +"#Page_409">409</a>, <a href="#Page_412">412</a>, <a href= +"#Page_418">418</a>, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>, <a href= +"#Page_445">445</a>, <a href="#Page_450">450</a>, <a href= +"#Page_452">452</a>, <a href="#Page_478">478</a>.</li> + +<li>Buxton, Mr. Francis, M.P., <a href="#Page_405">405</a>, +<a href="#Page_438">438</a>.</li> + +<li>Buxton, Rt. Hon. Sydney, M.P., <a href= +"#Page_405">405</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Camberwell Election, <a href="#c12">Chapter +XII</a>, <a href="#Page_471">471</a>, <a href="#Page_472">472</a>; +author is defeated at, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>, <a href= +"#appd">Appendix D</a>.</li> + +<li>Cambridge, H.R.H. George, Duke of, <a href="#Page_180">180</a>, +<a href="#Page_205">205</a>, <a href="#Page_206">206</a>, <a href= +"#Page_239">239</a>.</li> + +<li><span class="pagenum" id="Page_649">[649]</span>Campbell, Sir +George, M.P., Lieutenant-Governor of Bengal, <a href= +"#Page_235">235</a>.</li> + +<li>Campbell, Lady Archibald, <a href="#Page_446">446</a>.</li> + +<li>Campbell, Lady Colin, <a href="#Page_478">478</a>.</li> + +<li>Carmichael, Sir James, M.P., private secretary to Gladstone, +<a href="#Page_268">268</a>.</li> + +<li>Chamberlain, Rt. Hon. Joseph, M.P., President of the Board of +Trade in Gladstone’s Cabinet, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href= +"#Page_251">251</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href= +"#Page_274">274</a>, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>, <a href= +"#Page_370">370</a>, <a href="#Page_384">384</a>, <a href= +"#Page_440">440</a>, <a href="#Page_441">441</a>, <a href= +"#Page_489">489</a>.</li> + +<li>Chandler, Rev. Dr. Arthur, Bishop of Blomfontein, cousin of the +author, <a href="#Page_479">479</a>.</li> + +<li>Chaplin, Rt. Hon. Henry, M.P., <a href= +"#Page_386">386</a>.</li> + +<li>Chapman, Rev. Hugh, Vicar of St. Luke’s, Camberwell, afterwards +Chaplain of the Savoy, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>.</li> + +<li>Charmes, Gabriel, French journalist, his legends about the +author, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>; reason of his quarrel with +Nationalist Government in 1882, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_243">243</a>.</li> + +<li>Charter, Lord Dufferin’s, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href= +"#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_33">33</a>, <a href= +"#Page_62">62</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>; letter to author, +<a href="#appc">Appendix C</a>.</li> + +<li>Chenery, Mr., editor of the “Times,” <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, +<a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href= +"#Page_210">210</a>, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>; account of his +death, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>.</li> + +<li>Cherif Pacha. <em>See</em> Sherif.</li> + +<li>Churchill, Rt. Hon. Lord Randolph, M.P., Chief Secretary for +India under Salisbury, afterwards Chancellor of the Exchequer, +personally described, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href= +"#Page_213">213</a>; his indictment of Tewfik, <a href= +"#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href= +"#Page_211">211</a>, <a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>; Morley’s +opinion of, <a href="#Page_252">252</a>; his popularity with +Orientals, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>, <a href= +"#Page_276">276</a>, <a href="#Page_465">465</a>, <a href= +"#Page_468">468</a>, <a href="#Page_496">496</a>; his ideas about +India, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, +<a href="#Page_370">370</a>, <a href="#Page_412">412</a>, <a href= +"#Page_413">413</a>, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>, <a href= +"#Page_444">444</a>; would recall Arabi, <a href= +"#Page_238">238</a>, <a href="#Page_260">260</a>, <a href= +"#Page_414">414</a>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>; his ideas about +Egypt, <a href="#Page_414">414</a>, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>, +<a href="#Page_454">454</a>, <a href="#Page_455">455</a>, <a href= +"#Page_461">461</a>, <a href="#Page_486">486</a>; on Tory +Democracy, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>; he promises to support a +Parliamentary inquiry into the Indian Government, <a href= +"#Page_439">439</a>, <a href="#Page_496">496</a>, <a href= +"#Page_497">497</a>; at the India Office, <a href= +"#Page_452">452</a>, <a href="#Page_453">453</a>, <a href= +"#Page_456">456</a>, <a href="#Page_457">457</a>, <a href= +"#Page_460">460</a>, <a href="#Page_461">461</a>, <a href= +"#Page_464">464</a>, <a href="#Page_485">485</a>, <a href= +"#Page_491">491</a>, <a href="#Page_494">494</a>; his views on +Irish Home Rule, <a href="#Page_445">445</a>, <a href= +"#Page_465">465</a>, <a href="#Page_469">469</a>, <a href= +"#Page_483">483</a>; his connection with the Drummond Wolff +mission, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>, <a href="#Page_461">461</a>, +<a href="#Page_475">475</a>, <a href="#Page_478">478</a>, <a href= +"#Page_480">480</a>, <a href="#Page_481">481</a>, <a href= +"#Page_485">485</a>, <a href="#Page_486">486</a>, <a href= +"#Page_487">487</a>, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>, <a href= +"#Page_503">503</a>; his discussion with Jemal-ed-Din, <a href= +"#Page_466">466</a>; on a proposed revolution at Constantinople, +<a href="#Page_491">491</a>, <a href="#Page_493">493</a>; his share +in the annexation of Burmah, <a href="#Page_497">497</a>, <a href= +"#Page_498">498</a>, <a href="#Page_501">501</a>, <a href= +"#Page_503">503</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, +<a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href= +"#Page_27">27</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href= +"#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, <a href= +"#Page_210">210</a>, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>, <a href= +"#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>, <a href= +"#Page_219">219</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href= +"#Page_238">238</a>, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>, <a href= +"#Page_259">259</a>, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>, <a href= +"#Page_266">266</a>, <a href="#Page_278">278</a>, <a href= +"#Page_349">349</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>, <a href= +"#Page_370">370</a>, <a href="#Page_371">371</a>, <a href= +"#Page_390">390</a>, <a href="#Page_408">408</a>, <a href= +"#Page_412">412</a>, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>, <a href= +"#Page_418">418</a>, <a href="#Page_419">419</a>, <a href= +"#Page_424">424</a>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>, <a href= +"#Page_432">432</a>, <a href="#Page_435">435</a>, <a href= +"#Page_438">438</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>, <a href= +"#Page_441">441</a>, <a href="#Page_443">443</a>, <a href= +"#Page_446">446</a>, <a href="#Page_447">447</a>, <a href= +"#Page_448">448</a>, <a href="#Page_450">450</a>, <a href= +"#Page_452">452</a>, <a href="#Page_453">453</a>, <a href= +"#Page_464">464</a>, <a href="#Page_466">466</a>, <a href= +"#Page_467">467</a>, <a href="#Page_468">468</a>, <a href= +"#Page_469">469</a>, <a href="#Page_479">479</a>, <a href= +"#Page_480">480</a>, <a href="#Page_481">481</a>, <a href= +"#Page_482">482</a>, <a href="#Page_492">492</a>, <a href= +"#Page_494">494</a>, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>, <a href= +"#Page_496">496</a>, <a href="#Page_500">500</a>; author’s +correspondence with, <a href="#appd">Appendix D</a>.</li> + +<li>Clark, Dr., M.P., <a href="#Page_356">356</a>, <a href= +"#Page_435">435</a>.</li> + +<li>Coetlogon, Colonel, in command of Khartoum garrison, 1883, +<a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href= +"#Page_186">186</a>.</li> + +<li>Colvin, Sir Auckland, Anglo-Indian official, English Financial +Controller in Egypt, afterwards Lieutenant-Governor of the +North-West Provinces of India, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href= +"#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href= +"#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href= +"#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_282">282</a>, <a href= +"#Page_421">421</a>, <a href="#Page_452">452</a>.</li> + +<li>Connaught, H.R.H. the Duke of, <a href= +"#Page_372">372</a>.</li> + +<li><span class="pagenum" id="Page_650">[650]</span>Cookson, Sir +Charles, British Consul at Alexandria, <a href= +"#Page_63">63</a>.</li> + +<li>Coptic Patriarch, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>.</li> + +<li>Cordery, Mr., Anglo-Indian official, resident at Hyderabad, +<a href="#Page_239">239</a>, <a href="#Page_250">250</a>, <a href= +"#Page_348">348</a>, <a href="#Page_486">486</a>, <a href= +"#appg">Appendix G</a>.</li> + +<li>Corti, Count, Italian Ambassador at Constantinople, <a href= +"#Page_300">300</a>; author’s conversations with, <a href= +"#Page_301">301</a>, <a href="#Page_305">305</a>, <a href= +"#Page_315">315</a>, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>, <a href= +"#Page_321">321</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>; his account of +the Berlin Congress, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>. <em>Also</em> +<a href="#Page_319">319</a>, <a href="#Page_341">341</a>, <a href= +"#Page_364">364</a>.</li> + +<li>Cotton, Sir Henry, M.P., <a href="#Page_478">478</a>.</li> + +<li>Courtney, Rt. Hon. Leonard, M.P., now Lord Courtney of Penwith, +<a href="#Page_359">359</a>, <a href="#Page_377">377</a>, <a href= +"#Page_397">397</a>, <a href="#Page_399">399</a>, <a href= +"#Page_402">402</a>, <a href="#Page_420">420</a>, <a href= +"#Page_428">428</a>, <a href="#Page_432">432</a>.</li> + +<li>Cowper, Hon. Henry, friend of the author, <a href= +"#Page_483">483</a>, <a href="#Page_484">484</a>.</li> + +<li>Cromer, Earl of, formerly Sir Evelyn Baring, his appointment to +Cairo in 1883, <a href="#Page_38">38</a>; his “Nineteenth Century” +article, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>; his views in 1883, <a href= +"#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href= +"#Page_60">60</a>; his reputation in Egypt, <a href= +"#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>, <a href= +"#Page_57">57</a>; his character, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, +<a href="#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href= +"#Page_61">61</a>; his early career, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>; +author’s talks with in 1883, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href= +"#Page_60">60</a>, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>; his connection with +Lord Northbrook, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>; his untrustworthiness +as an historian, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href= +"#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>, <a href= +"#Page_157">157</a>; his responsibility for Hicks, <a href= +"#Page_84">84</a>; his quarrel with Gordon in 1879, <a href= +"#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>, <a href= +"#Page_247">247</a>; his “Modern Egypt,” <a href="#Page_v">v</a>, +<a href="#Page_viii">viii</a>, <a href="#Page_144">144</a>, +<a href="#Page_152">152</a>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>; his +antagonism to Gordon, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>, <a href= +"#Page_152">152</a>, <a href="#Page_167">167</a>; his misquotation +of a dispatch, <a href="#Page_157">157</a>, <a href= +"#Page_171">171</a>; his complaint as to the “Pall Mall Gazette,” +<a href="#Page_152">152</a>, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>, <a href= +"#Page_154">154</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href= +"#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a>, <a href= +"#Page_167">167</a>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>; his +responsibility for Gordon’s failure, <a href="#Page_157">157</a>, +<a href="#Page_192">192</a>, <a href="#Page_193">193</a>, <a href= +"#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>, <a href= +"#Page_199">199</a>, <a href="#Page_202">202</a>, <a href= +"#Page_214">214</a>; his unpublished letter to Gordon (date, 22nd +January 1884), <a href="#Page_194">194</a>; is considered a +failure, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>, +<a href="#Page_344">344</a>, <a href="#Page_410">410</a>; Lord +Hardinge’s opinion of, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>; to be recalled, +<a href="#Page_449">449</a>, <a href="#Page_450">450</a>, <a href= +"#Page_451">451</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_38">38</a>, +<a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href= +"#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>, <a href= +"#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href= +"#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_54">54</a>, <a href= +"#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href= +"#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href= +"#Page_59">59</a>, <a href="#Page_60">60</a>, <a href= +"#Page_61">61</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href= +"#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href= +"#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href= +"#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_83">83</a>, <a href= +"#Page_84">84</a>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href= +"#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>, <a href= +"#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>, <a href= +"#Page_144">144</a>, <a href="#Page_148">148</a>, <a href= +"#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>, <a href= +"#Page_153">153</a>, <a href="#Page_154">154</a>, <a href= +"#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_156">156</a>, <a href= +"#Page_157">157</a>, <a href="#Page_158">158</a>, <a href= +"#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href= +"#Page_163">163</a>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a>, <a href= +"#Page_167">167</a>, <a href="#Page_170">170</a>, <a href= +"#Page_171">171</a>, <a href="#Page_174">174</a>, <a href= +"#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href= +"#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>, <a href= +"#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="#Page_186">186</a>, <a href= +"#Page_192">192</a>, <a href="#Page_193">193</a>, <a href= +"#Page_194">194</a>, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>, <a href= +"#Page_196">196</a>, <a href="#Page_197">197</a>, <a href= +"#Page_198">198</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <a href= +"#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>, <a href= +"#Page_219">219</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>, <a href= +"#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href= +"#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>, <a href= +"#Page_231">231</a>, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>, <a href= +"#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>, <a href= +"#Page_321">321</a>, <a href="#Page_344">344</a>, <a href= +"#Page_345">345</a>, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>, <a href= +"#Page_393">393</a>, <a href="#Page_410">410</a>, <a href= +"#Page_429">429</a>, <a href="#appa">Appendices A</a> and <a href= +"#appc">C.</a></li> + +<li>“Curly,” Colonel George Knox, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>.</li> + +<li>Currie, Mr. Bertram, banker, member of the Indian Council, +cousin of the author, and friend of Gladstone, <a href= +"#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_352">352</a>, <a href= +"#Page_419">419</a>, <a href="#Page_420">420</a>, <a href= +"#Page_421">421</a>.</li> + +<li>Currie, Sir Donald, M.P., ship-owner, friend of Gladstone, +<a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>.</li> + +<li>Currie, Mr. George, cousin of the author, <a href= +"#Page_365">365</a>, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>.</li> + +<li>Currie, Sir Philip, afterwards Lord, private secretary to Lord +Salisbury, head of Foreign Office and Ambassador, cousin of the +author, <a href="#Page_130">130</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>, +<a href="#Page_373">373</a>, <a href="#Page_378">378</a>, <a href= +"#Page_386">386</a>, <a href="#Page_438">438</a>, <a href= +"#appc">Appendix C</a>.</li> + +<li>Curzon, Rt. Hon. George, M.P., afterwards Lord Curzon of +Kedleston, friend of the author, <a href="#Page_451">451</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Dalhousie, Earl of, <a href= +"#Page_431">431</a>.</li> + +<li><span class="pagenum" id="Page_651">[651]</span>De la Warr, +Earl of, political ally of author, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>, +<a href="#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>.</li> + +<li>Deli Nuzret, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>.</li> + +<li>Dervish Pasha, the Sultan’s envoy to Egypt in 1882, he accepted +bribes, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>, <a href= +"#Page_328">328</a>.</li> + +<li>Dickenson, Dr., of the Constantinople Embassy, <a href= +"#Page_338">338</a>.</li> + +<li>Dilke, Rt. Hon. Sir Charles, M.P., Under-Secretary for Foreign +Affairs in Gladstone’s Ministry, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, +<a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>, <a href= +"#Page_179">179</a>, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>, <a href= +"#Page_251">251</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href= +"#Page_257">257</a>, <a href="#Page_330">330</a>, <a href= +"#Page_345">345</a>, <a href="#Page_346">346</a>, <a href= +"#Page_352">352</a>, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>, <a href= +"#Page_369">369</a>, <a href="#Page_371">371</a>, <a href= +"#Page_374">374</a>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>, <a href= +"#Page_391">391</a>, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>; his saying that +Egypt would be “annexed under another name,” <a href= +"#Page_406">406</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_440">440</a>, +<a href="#Page_445">445</a>, <a href="#Page_452">452</a>.</li> + +<li>Dillon, John, M.P., his letter to Morley, <a href= +"#Page_252">252</a>.</li> + +<li>Disraeli, Benjamin, Lord Beaconsfield, story of, <a href= +"#Page_244">244</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href= +"#Page_412">412</a>.</li> + +<li>Drummond, Sir Victor, K.C.M.G., afterwards Her Majesty’s +Minister at Munich, friend of the author, <a href= +"#Page_287">287</a>.</li> + +<li>Dufferin, Earl of, Ambassador at Constantinople, afterwards +Viceroy of India, author’s personal recollection of, <a href= +"#Page_4">4</a>; his Egyptian settlement, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, +<a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>, <a href= +"#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href= +"#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href= +"#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href= +"#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>; his opinion of +Arabi, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href= +"#Page_13">13</a>; author’s correspondence with, <a href= +"#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#appc">Appendix C</a>; his relations +with Sultan Abdul Hamid, <a href="#Page_303">303</a>, <a href= +"#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="#Page_322">322</a>, <a href= +"#Page_333">333</a>, <a href="#Page_344">344</a>, <a href= +"#Page_348">348</a>; his responsibility for Burmah, <a href= +"#Page_497">497</a>, <a href="#Page_498">498</a>. <em>Also</em> +<a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href= +"#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href="#Page_8">8</a>, +<a href="#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href= +"#Page_18">18</a>, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href= +"#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href= +"#Page_22">22</a>, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href= +"#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href= +"#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href= +"#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href= +"#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href= +"#Page_68">68</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href= +"#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href= +"#Page_141">141</a>, <a href="#Page_145">145</a>, <a href= +"#Page_146">146</a>, <a href="#Page_148">148</a>, <a href= +"#Page_149">149</a>, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>, <a href= +"#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_222">222</a>, <a href= +"#Page_236">236</a>, <a href="#Page_238">238</a>, <a href= +"#Page_283">283</a>, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>, <a href= +"#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>, <a href= +"#Page_322">322</a>, <a href="#Page_333">333</a>, <a href= +"#Page_344">344</a>, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>, <a href= +"#Page_454">454</a>, <a href="#Page_486">486</a>, <a href= +"#Page_497">497</a>, <a href="#Page_498">498</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Earle, General, killed in the Soudan, <a href= +"#Page_377">377</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>.</li> + +<li>Earle, Mrs., <a href="#Page_399">399</a>.</li> + +<li>Egerton, Sir Edwin, <em>chargé d’affaires</em> at Cairo, +afterwards Ambassador at Madrid, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>, +<a href="#Page_495">495</a>.</li> + +<li>Elections, Egyptian, how managed, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, +<a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href= +"#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>.</li> + +<li>Elliot, Sir Henry, formerly Ambassador at Constantinople, +<a href="#Page_301">301</a>.</li> + +<li>Escott, Mr. T. H. S., editor of “Fortnightly,” <a href= +"#Page_392">392</a>.</li> + +<li>Europe, responsible for the ruin of the Soudan, <a href= +"#Page_79">79</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>.</li> + +<li>Exclusion from Egypt, the author’s, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, +<a href="#Page_207">207</a>, <a href="#Page_218">218</a>, <a href= +"#Page_222">222</a>, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>, <a href= +"#Page_246">246</a>, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>, <a href= +"#Page_256">256</a>, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>, <a href= +"#Page_275">275</a>, <a href="#Page_278">278</a>, <a href= +"#Page_487">487</a>, <a href="#Page_492">492</a>, <a href= +"#Page_495">495</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#c08">Chapter VIII</a> +and <a href="#appc">Appendix C</a>.</li> + +<li>Executions at Alexandria and Tantah, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, +<a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_26">26</a>, <a href= +"#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_53">53</a>. <em>Also</em> +<a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Faris, Selim Effendi, journalist at +Constantinople, author’s talks with, <a href="#Page_304">304</a>, +<a href="#Page_305">305</a>, <a href="#Page_317">317</a>, <a href= +"#Page_321">321</a>, <a href="#Page_327">327</a>, <a href= +"#Page_329">329</a>, <a href="#Page_332">332</a>, <a href= +"#Page_339">339</a>, <a href="#Page_341">341</a>, <a href= +"#Page_358">358</a>, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>, <a href= +"#Page_490">490</a>, <a href="#Page_493">493</a>.</li> + +<li>Fehmy, Hassan Pasha, Sultan’s envoy to London in 1885, <a href= +"#Page_358">358</a>, <a href="#Page_359">359</a>, <a href= +"#Page_360">360</a>, <a href="#Page_361">361</a>, <a href= +"#Page_363">363</a>, <a href="#Page_366">366</a>, <a href= +"#Page_367">367</a>, <a href="#Page_368">368</a>, <a href= +"#Page_372">372</a>, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>, <a href= +"#Page_375">375</a>, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>, <a href= +"#Page_377">377</a>, <a href="#Page_378">378</a>, <a href= +"#Page_382">382</a>, <a href="#Page_389">389</a>, <a href= +"#Page_394">394</a>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>, <a href= +"#Page_425">425</a>.</li> + +<li>Fenni, Mohammed Effendi, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>.</li> + +<li>Ferid Bey, first Secretary of Turkish Embassy, <a href= +"#Page_385">385</a>, <a href="#Page_448">448</a>; his communication +as to proposed revolution in Turkey, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_493">493</a>.</li> + +<li>Ferry, M. Jules, French Prime Minister, <a href= +"#Page_229">229</a>, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>, <a href= +"#Page_351">351</a>.</li> + +<li>Fitzmaurice, Lord Edmund, Under-Secretary for +Foreign<span class="pagenum" id="Page_652">[652]</span> Affairs, +afterwards Lord Fitzmaurice, <a href="#Page_144">144</a>, <a href= +"#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_164">164</a>, <a href= +"#Page_174">174</a>, <a href="#Page_189">189</a>, <a href= +"#Page_203">203</a>.</li> + +<li>Flower, Mr. Cyril, M.P., afterwards Lord Battersea, <a href= +"#Page_438">438</a>.</li> + +<li>Ford, Sir Clare, afterwards Ambassador at Constantinople, +<a href="#Page_436">436</a>.</li> + +<li>Forster, Rt. Hon. W. G., M.P., Chief Secretary for Ireland +1880-1882, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>, <a href= +"#Page_261">261</a>.</li> + +<li>Fowzi, Ibrahim Bey, with Gordon in the Soudan, Arabist in 1882, +accompanies Gordon to Khartoum in 1884, <a href= +"#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>, <a href= +"#appa">Appendix A</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Gessi Pasha, served in the Soudan under Gordon, +<a href="#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>, <a href= +"#Page_119">119</a>, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>; Suliman Zebehr +shot by, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>.</li> + +<li>Ghose, Mr. Lal Mohun, Indian delegate, <a href= +"#Page_496">496</a>, <a href="#Page_497">497</a>.</li> + +<li>Giegler Pasha, German official in the Khedivial service, +<a href="#Page_154">154</a>.</li> + +<li>Gladstone, Rt. Hon. Herbert, M.P., afterwards Lord Gladstone, +made use of by his father politically, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, +<a href="#Page_250">250</a>, <a href="#Page_379">379</a>.</li> + +<li>Gladstone, Rt. Hon. W. E., M.P., Prime Minister, his intention +of restoring Arabi, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href= +"#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_41">41</a>, <a href= +"#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_44">44</a>, <a href= +"#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href= +"#Page_57">57</a>, <a href="#Page_381">381</a>; author’s +correspondence with through Sir E. Hamilton, <a href= +"#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href= +"#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_228">228</a>, <a href= +"#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_246">246</a>, <a href= +"#Page_247">247</a>, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>, <a href= +"#Page_256">256</a>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>, <a href= +"#Page_349">349</a>, <a href="#Page_393">393</a>, <a href= +"#Page_399">399</a>, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>, <a href= +"#Page_408">408</a>, <a href="#Page_433">433</a>, <a href= +"#Page_487">487</a>, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>, <a href= +"#appc">Appendix C</a>; Hartington’s intrigue against, <a href= +"#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href= +"#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="#Page_167">167</a>, <a href= +"#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>, <a href= +"#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_205">205</a>, <a href= +"#Page_352">352</a>; was he responsible towards Gordon? <a href= +"#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>, <a href= +"#Page_183">183</a>, <a href="#Page_184">184</a>, <a href= +"#Page_203">203</a>; he uses his son Herbert, <a href= +"#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_250">250</a>, <a href= +"#Page_379">379</a>; a political gambler, <a href= +"#Page_215">215</a>; his speeches, <a href="#Page_226">226</a>, +<a href="#Page_240">240</a>, <a href="#Page_278">278</a>, <a href= +"#Page_385">385</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>, <a href= +"#Page_405">405</a>, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>; at Hawarden on +Christmas Eve, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>; violent language about, +<a href="#Page_362">362</a>; at the play, <a href= +"#Page_377">377</a>; his defeat in the House, 9th June 1885, +<a href="#Page_443">443</a>; Bright’s letter to, <a href= +"#Page_445">445</a>; Cardinal Manning’s opinion of, <a href= +"#Page_500">500</a>; he pronounces for Home Rule, <a href= +"#Page_504">504</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, +<a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href= +"#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href= +"#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_25">25</a>, <a href= +"#Page_26">26</a>, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href= +"#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href= +"#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href= +"#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href= +"#Page_67">67</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href= +"#Page_134">134</a>, <a href="#Page_171">171</a>, <a href= +"#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="#Page_179">179</a>, <a href= +"#Page_210">210</a>, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>, <a href= +"#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>, <a href= +"#Page_222">222</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href= +"#Page_226">226</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>, <a href= +"#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>, <a href= +"#Page_232">232</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href= +"#Page_237">237</a>, <a href="#Page_239">239</a>, <a href= +"#Page_242">242</a>, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>, <a href= +"#Page_249">249</a>, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>, <a href= +"#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href= +"#Page_259">259</a>, <a href="#Page_260">260</a>, <a href= +"#Page_261">261</a>, <a href="#Page_269">269</a>, <a href= +"#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_276">276</a>, <a href= +"#Page_283">283</a>, <a href="#Page_345">345</a>, <a href= +"#Page_346">346</a>, <a href="#Page_357">357</a>, <a href= +"#Page_359">359</a>, <a href="#Page_360">360</a>, <a href= +"#Page_364">364</a>, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>, <a href= +"#Page_378">378</a>, <a href="#Page_379">379</a>, <a href= +"#Page_380">380</a>, <a href="#Page_389">389</a>, <a href= +"#Page_390">390</a>, <a href="#Page_391">391</a>, <a href= +"#Page_392">392</a>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>, <a href= +"#Page_424">424</a>, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>, <a href= +"#Page_426">426</a>, <a href="#Page_431">431</a>, <a href= +"#Page_436">436</a>, <a href="#Page_445">445</a>, <a href= +"#Page_472">472</a>, <a href="#Page_488">488</a>, and <a href= +"#appa">Appendices A</a> and <a href="#appc">C.</a></li> + +<li>Gobineau, Count, author of “Essai sur l’inégalité des races +humaines,” friend of the author, <a href="#Page_288">288</a>.</li> + +<li>Godley, Sir Arthur, K.C.B., Under-Secretary of State for India, +<a href="#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="#Page_239">239</a>, <a href= +"#Page_250">250</a>, <a href="#Page_391">391</a>, <a href= +"#Page_392">392</a>.</li> + +<li>Gordon, General Charles George, Pasha, “Chinese Gordon,” +<a href="#Page_vii">vii</a>, <a href="#Page_viii">viii</a>; his +letters to author, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href= +"#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href= +"#Page_12">12</a>, <a href="#Page_140">140</a>; he calls on author, +<a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_135">135</a>; his +testimony about Arabi, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href= +"#Page_11">11</a>, <a href="#Page_12">12</a>, <a href= +"#Page_140">140</a>; his character examined, <a href= +"#Page_87">87</a>, <a href="#Page_88">88</a>-94; his early work in +the Soudan, <a href="#Page_87">87</a>-121; his Bible, Christianity, +<a href="#Page_91">91</a>; his chastity, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>; +“Hailing the tram of the world,” <a href="#Page_94">94</a>; he +enters Ismaïl’s<span class="pagenum" id="Page_653">[653]</span> +service, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>; his interview with Sherif, +<a href="#Page_101">101</a>; he is considered mad, <a href= +"#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_94">94</a>, <a href= +"#Page_103">103</a>, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>, <a href= +"#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="#Page_136">136</a>; his fatalism, +<a href="#Page_108">108</a>-112; on the financial inquiry, <a href= +"#Page_123">123</a>; his quarrel with Cromer in 1878, <a href= +"#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>; Gordon and +Lesseps, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>; his quarrel with Nubar, +<a href="#Page_129">129</a>, <a href="#Page_131">131</a>; at the +Foreign Office, <a href="#Page_130">130</a>; Rivers Wilson’s +recollection of, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>; in India, <a href= +"#Page_133">133</a>, <a href="#appa">Appendix A</a>; at Jerusalem, +<a href="#Page_136">136</a>-143; his religious monomania, <a href= +"#Page_136">136</a>, <a href="#Page_138">138</a>; his last mission +to Khartoum, <a href="#Page_144">144</a>-206; “an unfit person,” +<a href="#Page_151">151</a>; he resigns his commission, <a href= +"#Page_163">163</a>; interviewed by Stead, <a href= +"#Page_164">164</a>; to have <em>carte blanche</em>, <a href= +"#Page_166">166</a>; to Sarawak the Soudan, <a href= +"#Page_169">169</a>; he visits Barnes, <a href="#Page_171">171</a>; +his fighting plan, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>; Gordon and the +Ministers, <a href="#Page_179">179</a>; was he disobedient? +<a href="#Page_181">181</a>-206; his Foreign Office instructions, +<a href="#Page_182">182</a>; his mistake about the Mahdi, <a href= +"#Page_185">185</a>, <a href="#Page_191">191</a>; Gordon and +Zebehr, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>; the change of plan at Cairo, +<a href="#Page_188">188</a>, <a href="#Page_194">194</a>; his +mission extended by Cromer, <a href="#Page_194">194</a>-199; was +help promised him? <a href="#Page_204">204</a>-206; at Khartoum, +<a href="#Page_207">207</a>-209, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href= +"#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_216">216</a>, <a href= +"#Page_218">218</a>, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>, <a href= +"#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href= +"#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="#Page_226">226</a>, <a href= +"#Page_230">230</a>, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>, <a href= +"#Page_232">232</a>, <a href="#Page_233">233</a>, <a href= +"#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="#Page_236">236</a>, <a href= +"#Page_240">240</a>, <a href="#Page_243">243</a>, <a href= +"#Page_247">247</a>, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>, <a href= +"#Page_283">283</a>, <a href="#Page_287">287</a>, <a href= +"#Page_299">299</a>, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>, <a href= +"#Page_364">364</a>, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>, <a href= +"#Page_373">373</a>, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>, <a href= +"#Page_376">376</a>, <a href="#Page_387">387</a>, <a href= +"#Page_389">389</a>, <a href="#Page_392">392</a>, <a href= +"#Page_416">416</a>, <a href="#Page_452">452</a>, <a href= +"#Page_453">453</a>.</li> + +<li>Gordon Papers, <a href="#appa">Appendices A</a> and <a href= +"#appc">C.</a></li> + +<li>Gordon, Sir Henry, brother of General Gordon, <a href= +"#Page_174">174</a>; his correspondence with Gladstone and others, +<a href="#appa">Appendix A</a>.</li> + +<li>Gordon, Colonel Louis, <a href="#Page_viii">viii</a>, <a href= +"#appa">Appendix A</a>.</li> + +<li>Gorst, Rt. Hon. Sir John, M.P., <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, +<a href="#Page_211">211</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href= +"#Page_219">219</a>.</li> + +<li>Goschen, Rt. Hon. George Joachim, M.P., afterwards Lord, +<a href="#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>, <a href= +"#Page_267">267</a>, <a href="#Page_269">269</a>, <a href= +"#Page_270">270</a>, <a href="#Page_322">322</a>, <a href= +"#Page_375">375</a>, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>.</li> + +<li>Gower, Mr. George Leveson, private secretary to Mr. Gladstone, +1880-1885, friend of the author, <a href="#Page_210">210</a>.</li> + +<li>Gower, Hon. Frederick Leveson, M.P., Lord Granville’s brother +and private secretary, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>, <a href= +"#Page_451">451</a>.</li> + +<li>Graham, General Sir Gerald, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>, +<a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <a href= +"#Page_402">402</a>, <a href="#Page_416">416</a>, <a href= +"#Page_427">427</a>, <a href="#Page_428">428</a>, <a href= +"#Page_430">430</a>; his letters about Gordon, <a href= +"#appa">Appendix A</a>.</li> + +<li>Granville, Earl, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, +1880-1885, chief obstacle to an honest settlement in Egypt, +<a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href="#Page_18">18</a>, <a href= +"#Page_31">31</a>; his position in Gladstone’s Cabinet, <a href= +"#Page_168">168</a>; his letters to Gladstone and Baring proposing +Gordon, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>, +<a href="#Page_175">175</a>; confirms author’s exclusion from +Egypt, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>; Morley’s opinion of, <a href= +"#Page_252">252</a>; Staal’s description of, <a href= +"#Page_398">398</a>; his assurance to Bright about Alexandria, +<a href="#Page_445">445</a>; out of office, <a href= +"#Page_445">445</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, +<a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href= +"#Page_31">31</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href= +"#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href= +"#Page_75">75</a>, <a href="#Page_85">85</a>, <a href= +"#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_154">154</a>, <a href= +"#Page_155">155</a>, <a href="#Page_163">163</a>, <a href= +"#Page_167">167</a>, <a href="#Page_168">168</a>, <a href= +"#Page_169">169</a>, <a href="#Page_170">170</a>, <a href= +"#Page_174">174</a>, <a href="#Page_175">175</a>, <a href= +"#Page_177">177</a>, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>, <a href= +"#Page_179">179</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>, <a href= +"#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_192">192</a>, <a href= +"#Page_194">194</a>, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>, <a href= +"#Page_206">206</a>, <a href="#Page_207">207</a>, <a href= +"#Page_235">235</a>, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>, <a href= +"#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_351">351</a>, <a href= +"#Page_359">359</a>, <a href="#Page_361">361</a>, <a href= +"#Page_365">365</a>, <a href="#Page_367">367</a>, <a href= +"#Page_374">374</a>, <a href="#Page_375">375</a>, <a href= +"#Page_378">378</a>, <a href="#Page_385">385</a>, <a href= +"#Page_391">391</a>, <a href="#Page_394">394</a>, <a href= +"#Page_395">395</a>, <a href="#Page_455">455</a>, and <a href= +"#appg">Appendix G</a>.</li> + +<li>Gregory, Sir William, friend and political ally of author, +<a href="#Page_29">29</a>, <a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href= +"#Page_242">242</a>, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>, <a href= +"#Page_266">266</a>, <a href="#Page_282">282</a>, <a href= +"#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_654">[654]</span> <a href="#Page_378">378</a>, +<a href="#Page_440">440</a>, <a href="#Page_476">476</a>; his +letters to author, <a href="#appg">Appendix G</a>.</li> + +<li>Gregory, Lady, friend and political ally of author, <a href= +"#Page_25">25</a>; letter from, <a href="#Page_29">29</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, +<a href="#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_242">242</a>, <a href= +"#Page_245">245</a>, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>, <a href= +"#Page_253">253</a>, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>, <a href= +"#Page_265">265</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>, <a href= +"#Page_373">373</a>, <a href="#Page_380">380</a>, <a href= +"#Page_389">389</a>, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>, <a href= +"#Page_486">486</a>; extracts from her letters, <a href= +"#appg">Appendix G</a>.</li> + +<li>Griffin, Sir Lepel, high Anglo-Indian official, <a href= +"#Page_391">391</a>, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>, <a href= +"#Page_414">414</a>, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>, <a href= +"#Page_465">465</a>.</li> + +<li>Gros Bois, <a href="#Page_285">285</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Hafiz Behram Agha, Sultan’s chief eunuch, +<a href="#Page_318">318</a>.</li> + +<li>Hake, Mr. Egmont, author of “Chinese Gordon,” <a href= +"#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>; employed to +lecture on Gordon by Lord Salisbury, <a href= +"#Page_475">475</a>.</li> + +<li>Halim Pasha, Prince, legitimate successor to the Khedive +Ismaïl, Pretender to Khedivate, his conversation with the author, +<a href="#Page_337">337</a>; his correspondence with the author, +<a href="#Page_389">389</a>, <a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_13">13</a>, +<a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href= +"#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href= +"#Page_230">230</a>, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>, <a href= +"#Page_302">302</a>, <a href="#Page_310">310</a>, <a href= +"#Page_313">313</a>, <a href="#Page_315">315</a>, <a href= +"#Page_321">321</a>, <a href="#Page_336">336</a>, <a href= +"#Page_440">440</a>.</li> + +<li>Halim, Princess, <a href="#Page_314">314</a>, <a href= +"#Page_336">336</a>.</li> + +<li>Hamilton, Sir Edward, Gladstone’s chief private secretary, +1880-1885, friend of the author, his correspondence with the +author, <a href="#Page_278">278</a>, <a href="#Page_331">331</a>, +<a href="#Page_340">340</a>, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>, <a href= +"#Page_401">401</a>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>, <a href= +"#Page_420">420</a>, <a href="#Page_433">433</a>, <a href= +"#appc">Appendix C</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, +<a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href= +"#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>, <a href= +"#Page_216">216</a>, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>, <a href= +"#Page_218">218</a>, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>, <a href= +"#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>, <a href= +"#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>, <a href= +"#Page_246">246</a>, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>, <a href= +"#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href= +"#Page_259">259</a>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>, <a href= +"#Page_451">451</a>.</li> + +<li>Harcourt, Rt. Hon. Sir William Vernon, M.P., Home Secretary in +Gladstone’s Cabinet, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>, <a href= +"#Page_378">378</a>, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>, <a href= +"#Page_448">448</a>.</li> + +<li>Hardinge, Hon. Charles, of the Diplomatic Service, private +secretary to Lord Dufferin at Constantinople, afterwards Ambassador +at St. Petersburg and Viceroy of India, <a href= +"#Page_363">363</a>, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>, <a href= +"#Page_374">374</a>, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>; his opinion of +Baring, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>.</li> + +<li>Harrison, Mr. Frederic, Head of the Positivist Society, and +friend of author, his conversations with the author, <a href= +"#Page_248">248</a>, <a href="#Page_371">371</a>, <a href= +"#Page_431">431</a>, <a href="#Page_436">436</a>; his speech at +Westminster Town Hall, 4th March, <a href="#Page_392">392</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_251">251</a>, <a href= +"#Page_253">253</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href= +"#Page_256">256</a>, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>, <a href= +"#Page_451">451</a>, <a href="#Page_497">497</a>.</li> + +<li>Hartington, Marquess of, afterwards Duke of Devonshire, +Secretary of State for India in Gladstone’s Cabinet, his +responsibility for the Gordon mission, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>, +<a href="#Page_248">248</a>; his intrigue against Gladstone, +<a href="#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>, <a href= +"#Page_167">167</a>, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>, <a href= +"#Page_370">370</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, +<a href="#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>, <a href= +"#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_164">164</a>, <a href= +"#Page_165">165</a>, <a href="#Page_167">167</a>, <a href= +"#Page_168">168</a>, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>, <a href= +"#Page_173">173</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href= +"#Page_178">178</a>, <a href="#Page_179">179</a>, <a href= +"#Page_203">203</a>, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>, <a href= +"#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_241">241</a>, <a href= +"#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href= +"#Page_276">276</a>, <a href="#Page_345">345</a>, <a href= +"#Page_390">390</a>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>, <a href= +"#Page_408">408</a>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>, <a href= +"#Page_432">432</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>, <a href= +"#Page_445">445</a>, <a href="#Page_472">472</a>, <a href= +"#Page_473">473</a>, <a href="#Page_486">486</a>.</li> + +<li>Haymerlé, Baron, Prime Minister of Austria, early friend of +author, <a href="#Page_300">300</a>.</li> + +<li>Henderson, Consul at Aleppo, <a href="#Page_303">303</a>, +<a href="#Page_323">323</a>.</li> + +<li>Herbert, the Hon. Auberon, friend of the author, <a href= +"#Page_213">213</a>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>; his individualist +ideas, <a href="#Page_483">483</a>.</li> + +<li>Herbert, Hon. Sir Michael, friend of author. <em>See</em> +“Bungo.”</li> + +<li>Herbert, Hon. Sidney, M.P., afterwards Earl of Pembroke, friend +of author, <a href="#Page_450">450</a>.</li> + +<li>Hicks Pasha, General, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href= +"#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href= +"#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href= +"#Page_85">85</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>, <a href= +"#Page_146">146</a>, <a href="#Page_149">149</a>,<span class= +"pagenum" id="Page_655">[655]</span> <a href="#Page_150">150</a>, +<a href="#Page_152">152</a>, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>, <a href= +"#Page_154">154</a>, <a href="#Page_159">159</a>, <a href= +"#Page_191">191</a>, <a href="#Page_200">200</a>, <a href= +"#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>.</li> + +<li>Hicks Beach, Sir Michael, M.P., afterwards Lord St. Aldwyn, +<a href="#Page_239">239</a>, <a href="#Page_240">240</a>, <a href= +"#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>.</li> + +<li>Hill, Mr., editor of “Daily News,” <a href= +"#Page_232">232</a>.</li> + +<li>Hobart Pasha, Admiral the Hon. Augustus, in the Turkish +service, author’s conversations with at Constantinople, <a href= +"#Page_302">302</a>; sent as Sultan’s private envoy to London, +<a href="#Page_364">364</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href= +"#Page_304">304</a>, <a href="#Page_366">366</a>, <a href= +"#Page_368">368</a>, <a href="#Page_378">378</a>, <a href= +"#Page_398">398</a>, <a href="#Page_416">416</a>, <a href= +"#Page_417">417</a>, <a href="#Page_441">441</a>.</li> + +<li>Holkar, Maharajah, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>.</li> + +<li>Holland, the Rev. Scott, Canon of St. Paul’s, <a href= +"#Page_240">240</a>.</li> + +<li>Hope, Edward, author’s private secretary, <a href= +"#Page_283">283</a>, <a href="#Page_469">469</a>.</li> + +<li>Howard, George, M.P., afterwards Earl of Carlisle, friend of +author, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, +<a href="#Page_259">259</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>, <a href= +"#Page_267">267</a>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>, <a href= +"#Page_404">404</a>, <a href="#Page_417">417</a>, <a href= +"#Page_462">462</a>.</li> + +<li>Howard, Mrs. George, afterwards Countess of Carlisle, friend of +author, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_215">215</a>, +<a href="#Page_232">232</a>, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>, <a href= +"#Page_246">246</a>, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>, <a href= +"#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_259">259</a>, <a href= +"#Page_261">261</a>, <a href="#Page_265">265</a>, <a href= +"#Page_282">282</a>, <a href="#Page_402">402</a>, <a href= +"#Page_405">405</a>, <a href="#Page_415">415</a>, <a href= +"#Page_416">416</a>, <a href="#Page_418">418</a>, <a href= +"#Page_419">419</a>, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>, <a href= +"#Page_434">434</a>, <a href="#Page_440">440</a>, <a href= +"#Page_445">445</a>, <a href="#Page_462">462</a>.</li> + +<li>Hughes, Tom, author of “Tom Brown’s Schooldays,” <a href= +"#Page_361">361</a>.</li> + +<li>Hunter, Professor, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>.</li> + +<li>Husseyn Pasha, aide-de-camp to the Sultan, <a href= +"#Page_319">319</a>, <a href="#Page_403">403</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Ibrahim Adhem Bey, Mudir of Tantah, partisan of +Khedive Tewfik, <a href="#Page_324">324</a>; his connection with +riots at Tantah. <em>See</em> Tantah.</li> + +<li>Ibrahim-el-Senoussi, Sheykh, <a href="#Page_403">403</a>.</li> + +<li>Ibrahim Bey. <em>See</em> Moelhy.</li> + +<li>Inglefield, Colonel, <a href="#Page_415">415</a>.</li> + +<li>Ismaïl, ex-Khedive, his connection with Gordon, <a href= +"#Page_89">89</a>, <a href="#Page_96">96</a>, <a href= +"#Page_98">98</a>-104, <a href="#Page_112">112</a>, <a href= +"#Page_118">118</a>, <a href="#Page_120">120</a>, <a href= +"#Page_122">122</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>, <a href= +"#Page_125">125</a>, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>, <a href= +"#Page_127">127</a>, <a href="#Page_128">128</a>, <a href= +"#Page_130">130</a>; his intrigues in London, <a href= +"#Page_245">245</a>, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>, <a href= +"#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>, <a href= +"#Page_377">377</a>, <a href="#Page_447">447</a>; author’s talk +with, <a href="#Page_279">279</a>, <a href="#Page_280">280</a>; +Ismaïl as a boy, <a href="#Page_311">311</a>, <a href= +"#Page_312">312</a>; he lends money to the King of Italy, <a href= +"#Page_315">315</a>; his deposition in 1879, <a href= +"#Page_329">329</a>; is patronized by Bismarck, <a href= +"#Page_358">358</a>; Arabi refuses to have anything to do with, +<a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href= +"#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>, <a href= +"#Page_239">239</a>, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>, <a href= +"#Page_281">281</a>, <a href="#Page_301">301</a>, <a href= +"#Page_359">359</a>, <a href="#Page_378">378</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Jamil Pasha, <a href="#Page_303">303</a>.</li> + +<li>James, Rt. Hon. Sir Henry, M.P., afterwards Lord James of +Hereford, <a href="#Page_278">278</a>.</li> + +<li>Jemal-ed-Din Afghani, Seyyid, well-known Moslem reformer living +in exile at Paris, proposed mediation with the Mahdi through, +<a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href="#Page_226">226</a>, <a href= +"#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="#Page_286">286</a>, <a href= +"#Page_287">287</a>, <a href="#Page_338">338</a>, <a href= +"#Page_389">389</a>, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>, <a href= +"#Page_410">410</a>, <a href="#Page_411">411</a>, <a href= +"#appb">Appendix B</a>; his correspondence with author, <a href= +"#appb">Appendix B</a>; in England, <a href="#Page_464">464</a>; +his talks with Churchill, <a href="#Page_465">465</a>-468; his +talks with Drummond Wolff, <a href="#Page_473">473</a>, <a href= +"#Page_478">478</a>; he is to help Wolff in his mission, <a href= +"#Page_480">480</a>, <a href="#Page_481">481</a>, <a href= +"#Page_482">482</a>, <a href="#Page_486">486</a>, <a href= +"#Page_487">487</a>; he leaves England angry, <a href= +"#Page_500">500</a>, <a href="#Page_501">501</a>; his death in +1902, <a href="#Page_501">501</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href= +"#Page_40">40</a>, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href= +"#Page_46">46</a>, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href= +"#Page_208">208</a>, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>, <a href= +"#Page_272">272</a>, <a href="#Page_358">358</a>, <a href= +"#Page_368">368</a>, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>, <a href= +"#Page_386">386</a>, <a href="#Page_387">387</a>, <a href= +"#Page_388">388</a>, <a href="#Page_412">412</a>, <a href= +"#Page_444">444</a>, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>, <a href= +"#Page_457">457</a>, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>, <a href= +"#Page_461">461</a>, <a href="#Page_473">473</a>, <a href= +"#Page_474">474</a>, <a href="#Page_475">475</a>, <a href= +"#Page_476">476</a>, <a href="#Page_477">477</a>, <a href= +"#Page_479">479</a>, <a href="#Page_485">485</a>, <a href= +"#Page_488">488</a>, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>, <a href= +"#Page_491">491</a>, <a href="#Page_492">492</a>, <a href= +"#Page_499">499</a>.</li> + +<li>Jews in Poland, <a href="#Page_290">290</a>, <a href= +"#Page_293">293</a>.</li> + +<li>Jowdat, Ismaïl Bey, head of Cairo police during the +war,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_656">[656]</span> in exile at +Constantinople in 1884, <a href="#Page_310">310</a>, <a href= +"#Page_313">313</a>, <a href="#Page_319">319</a>; his evidence on +the Alexandria and Cairo massacres, <a href="#Page_319">319</a>, +<a href="#Page_323">323</a>, <a href="#Page_330">330</a>, <a href= +"#Page_339">339</a>, <a href="#Page_340">340</a>, <a href= +"#appb">Appendix B</a>; in London, <a href="#Page_342">342</a>, +<a href="#Page_343">343</a>, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>, <a href= +"#Page_357">357</a>; ordered to Constantinople, <a href= +"#Page_358">358</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_434">434</a>, +<a href="#Page_486">486</a>, <a href="#Page_487">487</a>, <a href= +"#Page_488">488</a>.</li> + +<li>Jung, Nawab Salar, Prime Minister to the Nizam, <a href= +"#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_239">239</a>, <a href= +"#Page_371">371</a>, <a href="#Page_413">413</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Kandil, Seyd, Chief of Police at Alexandria in +1882, condemned to prison for asserted connection with Alexandria +riot, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>.</li> + +<li>Khalil, Sheykh Mohammed, disciple of Sheykh Mohammed Abdu, +<a href="#Page_66">66</a>.</li> + +<li>Kerr, General Lord Mark, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>, <a href= +"#Page_371">371</a>, <a href="#Page_372">372</a>.</li> + +<li>Khair-ed-Din Pasha, ex-Vizier, <a href="#Page_242">242</a>, +<a href="#Page_245">245</a>, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>, <a href= +"#Page_303">303</a>, <a href="#Page_305">305</a>, <a href= +"#Page_307">307</a>, <a href="#Page_329">329</a>.</li> + +<li>Kiamyl, Prince, cousin of the Khedive, <a href= +"#Page_326">326</a>.</li> + +<li>Kimberley, Earl of, Chief Secretary for India in the Gladstone +Cabinet, <a href="#Page_452">452</a>.</li> + +<li>Knowles, Sir James, editor of the “Nineteenth Century Review,” +friend of Gladstone, <a href="#Page_40">40</a>, <a href= +"#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href= +"#Page_44">44</a>, <a href="#Page_209">209</a>, <a href= +"#Page_210">210</a>, <a href="#Page_246">246</a>, <a href= +"#Page_247">247</a>, <a href="#Page_249">249</a>, <a href= +"#Page_275">275</a>, <a href="#Page_359">359</a>.</li> + +<li>Kurds, proposed rising of, <a href="#Page_330">330</a>, +<a href="#Page_342">342</a>, <a href="#Page_343">343</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Labouchere, Rt. Hon. Henry, M.P., friend of +author, <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, +<a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>, <a href= +"#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>, <a href= +"#Page_271">271</a>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>, <a href= +"#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>; his conversations +with the author, <a href="#Page_379">379</a>, <a href= +"#Page_380">380</a>, <a href="#Page_393">393</a>, <a href= +"#Page_399">399</a>, <a href="#Page_424">424</a>, <a href= +"#Page_427">427</a>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>.</li> + +<li>Lagergren, Mr., Swedish traveller, <a href= +"#Page_299">299</a>.</li> + +<li>Laing, Mr., Director of the Regie at Constantinople, <a href= +"#Page_326">326</a>.</li> + +<li>Laing, Miss, formerly companion to Princess Nazli, <a href= +"#Page_313">313</a>.</li> + +<li>Lamb, Lady Caroline, <a href="#Page_483">483</a>.</li> + +<li>Lambert, professional tennis player, <a href= +"#Page_434">434</a>.</li> + +<li>Lampson, Sir Curtis, Bart., neighbour and friend of author, +<a href="#Page_401">401</a>.</li> + +<li>Langiewitz, General, Polish patriot, <a href= +"#Page_316">316</a>.</li> + +<li>Lascelles, Sir Frank, G.C.B., Acting Diplomatic Agent in Egypt, +afterwards Ambassador at Berlin, friend of author, <a href= +"#Page_243">243</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href= +"#Page_257">257</a>, <a href="#Page_259">259</a>, <a href= +"#Page_261">261</a>, <a href="#Page_281">281</a>.</li> + +<li>Lavison, Mr., secretary to ex-Khedive Ismaïl, <a href= +"#Page_279">279</a>.</li> + +<li>Lawson, Sir Wilfrid, Bart., M.P., <a href="#Page_28">28</a>, +<a href="#Page_212">212</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href= +"#Page_219">219</a>, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>, <a href= +"#Page_240">240</a>, <a href="#Page_252">252</a>, <a href= +"#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_259">259</a>, <a href= +"#Page_266">266</a>, <a href="#Page_271">271</a>, <a href= +"#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>, <a href= +"#Page_275">275</a>, <a href="#Page_276">276</a>, <a href= +"#Page_279">279</a>, <a href="#Page_282">282</a>.</li> + +<li>Layard, Rt. Hon. Sir Henry, ex-Ambassador at Constantinople, +<a href="#Page_317">317</a>, <a href="#Page_365">365</a>.</li> + +<li>Leconfield, Henry, Lord, cousin of author, <a href= +"#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_357">357</a>, <a href= +"#Page_448">448</a>.</li> + +<li>Lee, Sir Henry Austin, K.C.M.G., private secretary to Lord E. +Fitzmaurice at the Foreign Office, afterwards English +representative on the Suez Canal Committee, <a href= +"#Page_373">373</a>.</li> + +<li>Leigh, Mr., of the Diplomatic Service, afterwards Lord Newton, +<a href="#Page_287">287</a>.</li> + +<li>Leitner, Dr., Orientalist, <a href="#Page_236">236</a>.</li> + +<li>Leopold, King of the Belgians, <a href="#Page_101">101</a>, +<a href="#Page_136">136</a>, <a href="#Page_143">143</a>, <a href= +"#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_158">158</a>, <a href= +"#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="#Page_163">163</a>, <a href= +"#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>, <a href= +"#Page_182">182</a>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>.</li> + +<li>Lesseps, Count Ferdinand de, his connection with Gordon, +<a href="#Page_122">122</a>, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>, <a href= +"#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>, <a href= +"#Page_126">126</a>.</li> + +<li><span class="pagenum" id="Page_657">[657]</span>Lloyd, Mr. +Clifford, Chief of Police in Ireland, employed in Egypt in 1884, +<a href="#Page_14">14</a>, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>, <a href= +"#Page_325">325</a>.</li> + +<li>Locker-Lampson, Mr. Frederick, poet and friend of the author, +<a href="#Page_498">498</a>.</li> + +<li>Long, Colonel Chaillé, American Colonel, served with Gordon in +the Soudan, <a href="#Page_178">178</a>.</li> + +<li>Lords, the House of, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>, <a href= +"#Page_271">271</a>.</li> + +<li>Lorne, Marquess of, afterwards Duke of Argyll, <a href= +"#Page_404">404</a>, <a href="#Page_408">408</a>, <a href= +"#Page_409">409</a>.</li> + +<li>Lothian, Schomberg, 9th Marquess of, Chief Secretary for +Scotland in Salisbury’s Cabinet, friend of author, <a href= +"#Page_437">437</a>, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>, <a href= +"#Page_452">452</a>, <a href="#Page_472">472</a>.</li> + +<li>Lowther, Rt. Hon. James, M.P., <a href="#Page_226">226</a>, +<a href="#Page_263">263</a>, <a href="#Page_379">379</a>, <a href= +"#Page_392">392</a>.</li> + +<li>Lucan, Field-Marshal Lord, <a href="#Page_426">426</a>, +<a href="#Page_427">427</a>.</li> + +<li>Lubienski, Rev. Father, a Polish priest, <a href= +"#Page_292">292</a>, <a href="#Page_293">293</a>.</li> + +<li>Lumsden, Sir Peter, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>, <a href= +"#Page_396">396</a>.</li> + +<li>Lyall, Rt. Hon. Sir Alfred, Lieutenant-Governor of North-West +Provinces of India, afterwards member of Indian Council, friend of +author, <a href="#Page_252">252</a>; his letters to author, +<a href="#appg">Appendix G</a>.</li> + +<li>Lymington, Lord, M.P., now Earl of Portsmouth, <a href= +"#Page_242">242</a>, <a href="#Page_377">377</a>.</li> + +<li>Lyons, Lord, Ambassador at Paris, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>, +<a href="#Page_209">209</a>, <a href="#Page_344">344</a>, <a href= +"#Page_359">359</a>.</li> + +<li>Lytton, Earl of, ex-Viceroy of India, afterwards Ambassador at +Paris, friend of the author, <a href="#Page_133">133</a>, <a href= +"#Page_222">222</a>, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>, <a href= +"#Page_258">258</a>, <a href="#Page_390">390</a>, <a href= +"#Page_399">399</a>, <a href="#Page_451">451</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Mahdi, Mohammed Ahmed, the, <a href= +"#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href= +"#Page_16">16</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href= +"#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_78">78</a>, <a href= +"#Page_80">80</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href= +"#Page_86">86</a>, <a href="#Page_149">149</a>, <a href= +"#Page_153">153</a>, <a href="#Page_155">155</a>, <a href= +"#Page_156">156</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href= +"#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_182">182</a>, <a href= +"#Page_185">185</a>, <a href="#Page_188">188</a>, <a href= +"#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>, <a href= +"#Page_191">191</a>, <a href="#Page_192">192</a>, <a href= +"#Page_194">194</a>, <a href="#Page_198">198</a>, <a href= +"#Page_200">200</a>, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>, <a href= +"#Page_204">204</a>, <a href="#Page_208">208</a>, <a href= +"#Page_209">209</a>, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>, <a href= +"#Page_215">215</a>, <a href="#Page_217">217</a>, <a href= +"#Page_218">218</a>, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>, <a href= +"#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href= +"#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>, <a href= +"#Page_230">230</a>, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>, <a href= +"#Page_234">234</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href= +"#Page_237">237</a>, <a href="#Page_240">240</a>, <a href= +"#Page_257">257</a>, <a href="#Page_261">261</a>, <a href= +"#Page_266">266</a>, <a href="#Page_267">267</a>, <a href= +"#Page_269">269</a>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>, <a href= +"#Page_348">348</a>; his character, <a href="#Page_351">351</a>, +<a href="#Page_442">442</a>; his death, <a href= +"#Page_459">459</a>, <a href="#Page_472">472</a>, <a href= +"#Page_505">505</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_355">355</a>, +<a href="#Page_362">362</a>, <a href="#Page_368">368</a>, <a href= +"#Page_369">369</a>, <a href="#Page_373">373</a>, <a href= +"#Page_379">379</a>, <a href="#Page_380">380</a>, <a href= +"#Page_384">384</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>, <a href= +"#Page_387">387</a>, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>, <a href= +"#Page_393">393</a>, <a href="#Page_398">398</a>, <a href= +"#Page_399">399</a>, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>, <a href= +"#Page_401">401</a>, <a href="#Page_402">402</a>, <a href= +"#Page_403">403</a>, <a href="#Page_411">411</a>, <a href= +"#Page_413">413</a>, <a href="#Page_416">416</a>, <a href= +"#Page_434">434</a>, <a href="#Page_438">438</a>, <a href= +"#Page_442">442</a>, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>, <a href= +"#Page_455">455</a>, <a href="#Page_466">466</a>.</li> + +<li>Malet, Sir Edward, Consul-General at Cairo, afterwards +Ambassador at Berlin, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href= +"#Page_38">38</a>, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>, <a href= +"#Page_41">41</a>, <a href="#Page_42">42</a>, <a href= +"#Page_43">43</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href= +"#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href= +"#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href= +"#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_84">84</a>, <a href= +"#Page_146">146</a>, <a href="#Page_286">286</a>, <a href= +"#Page_374">374</a>, <a href="#Page_393">393</a>, <a href= +"#Page_422">422</a>; his position with Bismarck, <a href= +"#Page_346">346</a>, <a href="#Page_395">395</a>.</li> + +<li>Malkum Khan, Prince, Persian Ambassador in London, <a href= +"#Page_277">277</a>.</li> + +<li>Manning, Cardinal, <a href="#Page_383">383</a>, <a href= +"#Page_384">384</a>, <a href="#Page_462">462</a>, <a href= +"#Page_469">469</a>, <a href="#Page_497">497</a>.</li> + +<li>Massowa, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>, <a href= +"#Page_387">387</a>.</li> + +<li>Maxwell, Sir Benson, Adviser to the Egyptian Government in the +department of Justice, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href= +"#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_265">265</a>.</li> + +<li>McCarthy, Mr. Huntley, M.P., <a href="#Page_422">422</a>, +<a href="#Page_423">423</a>, <a href="#Page_461">461</a>.</li> + +<li>McCarthy, Mr. Justin, M.P., author’s conversations with, +<a href="#Page_422">422</a>, <a href="#Page_423">423</a>, <a href= +"#Page_469">469</a>, <a href="#Page_476">476</a>.</li> + +<li>McGrath, Canon, <a href="#Page_469">469</a>.</li> + +<li>Mediation proposed by author in the Soudan, <a href= +"#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_224">224</a>, <a href= +"#Page_225">225</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>, <a href= +"#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href= +"#Page_352">352</a>, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>, <a href= +"#Page_355">355</a>, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>, <a href= +"#Page_384">384</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>, <a href= +"#Page_387">387</a>, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>, <a href= +"#Page_389">389</a>, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>, <a href= +"#Page_455">455</a>, <a href="#appb">Appendices B</a> and <a href= +"#appc">C.</a></li> + +<li>Mehariz Bey, Deputy Mudir at Tantah, his part in the riots, +<a href="#Page_325">325</a>, <a href="#Page_335">335</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>.</li> + +<li>Merv, the Russians at, <a href="#Page_467">467</a>, <a href= +"#Page_468">468</a>.</li> + +<li>Metemmeh, <a href="#Page_365">365</a>, <a href= +"#Page_368">368</a>, <a href="#Page_372">372</a>, <a href= +"#Page_373">373</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#appa">Appendix +A</a>.</li> + +<li><span class="pagenum" id="Page_658">[658]</span>Meynell, Mr. +Wilfrid, friend of the author, <a href="#Page_475">475</a>, +<a href="#Page_478">478</a>, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>.</li> + +<li>Midhat Pasha, his character, according to Vefyk Pasha, <a href= +"#Page_314">314</a>; his death, <a href="#Page_339">339</a>.</li> + +<li>Milner, Alfred, journalist, afterwards Governor of South Africa +and Lord, <a href="#Page_61">61</a>, <a href= +"#Page_487">487</a>.</li> + +<li>Minshawi, Ahmed Bey, afterwards Minshawi Pasha, <a href= +"#Page_21">21</a>; his visits to the author, <a href= +"#Page_334">334</a>, <a href="#Page_338">338</a>; his evidence as +to the Tantah massacre, <a href="#Page_335">335</a>, <a href= +"#Page_336">336</a>, <a href="#Page_339">339</a>, <a href= +"#Page_340">340</a>, <a href="#Page_341">341</a>; his letter to +author, <a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>.</li> + +<li>Mirza Bakir. <em>See</em> Bakir.</li> + +<li>“Modern Egypt,” <a href="#Page_v">v</a>, <a href= +"#Page_viii">viii</a>; its unreliable character as history, +<a href="#Page_61">61</a>.</li> + +<li>Moelhy, Ibrahim Bey, at one time private secretary to +ex-Khedive Ismaïl, living as an exile in London in 1885, <a href= +"#Page_354">354</a>, <a href="#Page_355">355</a>, <a href= +"#Page_357">357</a>, <a href="#Page_358">358</a>, <a href= +"#Page_359">359</a>, <a href="#Page_368">368</a>, <a href= +"#Page_381">381</a>, <a href="#Page_385">385</a>, <a href= +"#Page_401">401</a>, <a href="#Page_403">403</a>, <a href= +"#Page_408">408</a>, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>, <a href= +"#Page_434">434</a>, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>, <a href= +"#Page_459">459</a>, <a href="#Page_480">480</a>, <a href= +"#Page_487">487</a>, <a href="#Page_488">488</a>, <a href= +"#Page_491">491</a>, <a href="#Page_494">494</a>.</li> + +<li>Moffitt, Mrs., Gordon’s sister, <a href="#Page_viii">viii</a>, +<a href="#appa">Appendix A</a>.</li> + +<li>Mohammed Assad Bey, Muteserif of Candia, uncle-in-law of Aarif +Bey, <a href="#Page_342">342</a>.</li> + +<li>Moore, Mr. A. W., Lord Randolph Churchill’s private secretary, +<a href="#Page_485">485</a>, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>, <a href= +"#Page_498">498</a>.</li> + +<li>Moore, Mr. Lionel, Oriental secretary at Constantinople, and +friend of the Prince of Wales, his conversations with the author, +<a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href= +"#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>.</li> + +<li>Morier, Sir Robert, Ambassador at St. Petersburg, <a href= +"#Page_346">346</a>, <a href="#Page_385">385</a>.</li> + +<li>Morley, Rt. Hon. John, M.P., formerly editor of the “Pall Mall +Gazette,” afterwards Cabinet Minister and Lord, his prediction +about Lord Cromer, <a href="#Page_39">39</a>; his repentance for +bringing about the war of 1882, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>; his +“Life of Gladstone,” <a href="#Page_169">169</a>; his conversations +with the author, <a href="#Page_232">232</a>, <a href= +"#Page_233">233</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href= +"#Page_251">251</a>, <a href="#Page_260">260</a>, <a href= +"#Page_383">383</a>, <a href="#Page_420">420</a>; his opinion of +certain public men, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>, <a href= +"#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="#Page_253">253</a>; he is for “strong +government, the cutting off of heads,” <a href="#Page_251">251</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_144">144</a>, <a href= +"#Page_221">221</a>, <a href="#Page_252">252</a>, <a href= +"#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_256">256</a>, <a href= +"#Page_377">377</a>, <a href="#Page_385">385</a>, <a href= +"#Page_390">390</a>, <a href="#Page_402">402</a>.</li> + +<li>Morocco, French plan to annex, opposed by Communists, <a href= +"#Page_353">353</a>.</li> + +<li>Morris, William, poet and friend of the author, <a href= +"#Page_408">408</a>, <a href="#Page_488">488</a>, <a href= +"#Page_496">496</a>, <a href="#Page_499">499</a>.</li> + +<li>Munir Pasha, Chamberlain to the Sultan, <a href= +"#Page_328">328</a>, <a href="#Page_332">332</a>, <a href= +"#Page_339">339</a>.</li> + +<li>Mustafa Bey Nejdi, Arabi’s doctor, living in exile at +Constantinople, <a href="#Page_313">313</a>; his account of +Tel-el-Kebir, <a href="#Page_323">323</a>; as to Alexandrian riots, +<a href="#Page_325">325</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href= +"#Page_336">336</a>, <a href="#Page_339">339</a>, <a href= +"#Page_341">341</a>, <a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>.</li> + +<li>Musurus Pasha, Turkish Ambassador, <a href="#Page_322">322</a>, +<a href="#Page_341">341</a>, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Nadir Shah gives Arab horses to the Turcomans, +<a href="#Page_479">479</a>.</li> + +<li>Napier, Major, now Lord Napier of Magdala, <a href= +"#Page_225">225</a>.</li> + +<li>Napier, Hon. Mark, Counsel with Broadley at Arabi’s trial, +friend of author, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>, <a href= +"#Page_372">372</a>, <a href="#Page_373">373</a>, <a href= +"#Page_456">456</a>, <a href="#Page_478">478</a>; proposes with +others to rescue Gordon, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>.</li> + +<li>Naworth Castle, <a href="#Page_288">288</a>.</li> + +<li>Nazleh, Princess, cousin of Khedive Tewfik, <a href= +"#Page_42">42</a>.</li> + +<li>Nebbi Ullah, Seyd, Khan of Lucknow, <a href= +"#Page_382">382</a>, <a href="#Page_473">473</a>.</li> + +<li>Nélidoff, M. de, Russian Ambassador at +Constantinople,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_659">[659]</span> +early friend of author, <a href="#Page_300">300</a>, <a href= +"#Page_316">316</a>, <a href="#Page_339">339</a>, <a href= +"#Page_398">398</a>.</li> + +<li>Neville, Lady Dorothy, <a href="#Page_436">436</a>.</li> + +<li>Nicholas, Grand Duke, commanding the Russian army before +Constantinople in 1878, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>.</li> + +<li>Ninet, Swiss patriot who sided with the Egyptian Nationalists +in 1882, <a href="#Page_313">313</a>.</li> + +<li>“Nineteenth Century Review,” author’s article on Egyptian +Revolution in, <a href="#Page_9">9</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>; +article by Sir E. Baring on Lord Ripon’s policy in India, <a href= +"#Page_42">42</a>, <a href="#Page_43">43</a>; author’s article on +proposed Arab race at Newmarket in, <a href= +"#Page_237">237</a>.</li> + +<li>Nizam, the, of the Deccan, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>, +<a href="#Page_397">397</a>, <a href="#appg">Appendix G</a>.</li> + +<li>Noailles, M. de, French Ambassador at Constantinople, <a href= +"#Page_301">301</a>, <a href="#Page_320">320</a>.</li> + +<li>Northcote, Sir Stafford, afterwards Earl of Iddesleigh, leader +of the Opposition, Chief Secretary for Foreign Affairs under +Salisbury, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, <a href= +"#Page_220">220</a>, <a href="#Page_252">252</a>, <a href= +"#Page_261">261</a>, <a href="#Page_262">262</a>.</li> + +<li>Northbrook, Earl of, First Lord of the Admiralty in Gladstone’s +Cabinet, his financial proposals, <a href="#Page_344">344</a>, +<a href="#Page_345">345</a>, <a href="#Page_346">346</a>, <a href= +"#Page_352">352</a>, <a href="#Page_370">370</a>; with regard to +native evidence, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>; his letter to Gordon, +<a href="#appa">Appendix A</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href= +"#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href= +"#Page_23">23</a>, <a href="#Page_58">58</a>, <a href= +"#Page_133">133</a>, <a href="#Page_134">134</a>, <a href= +"#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>, <a href= +"#Page_179">179</a>, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>, <a href= +"#Page_278">278</a>, <a href="#Page_284">284</a>, <a href= +"#Page_299">299</a>, <a href="#Page_359">359</a>, <a href= +"#Page_410">410</a>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>, <a href= +"#Page_447">447</a>, <a href="#Page_458">458</a>.</li> + +<li>Novikoff, Madame de, <a href="#Page_245">245</a>, <a href= +"#Page_277">277</a>, <a href="#Page_373">373</a>, <a href= +"#Page_447">447</a>.</li> + +<li>Nubar Pasha, Armenian Prime Minister in Egypt, <a href= +"#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_95">95</a>, <a href= +"#Page_102">102</a>, <a href="#Page_103">103</a>, <a href= +"#Page_118">118</a>, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>, <a href= +"#Page_129">129</a>, <a href="#Page_131">131</a>, <a href= +"#Page_140">140</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>, <a href= +"#Page_170">170</a>, <a href="#Page_171">171</a>, <a href= +"#Page_175">175</a>, <a href="#Page_176">176</a>, <a href= +"#Page_178">178</a>, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>, <a href= +"#Page_194">194</a>, <a href="#Page_195">195</a>, <a href= +"#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="#Page_199">199</a>, <a href= +"#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_223">223</a>, <a href= +"#Page_243">243</a>, <a href="#Page_268">268</a>, <a href= +"#Page_287">287</a>; his quarrel with Gordon in 1878, <a href= +"#Page_129">129</a>, <a href="#Page_247">247</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Obeyd, Mohammed Bey, fellah officer killed at +Tel-el-Kebir, <a href="#Page_355">355</a>.</li> + +<li>Odessa, <a href="#Page_297">297</a>.</li> + +<li>O’Kelly, James, M.P., Parnellite member, correspondent of the +“Daily News” during Dongola Expedition, <a href= +"#Page_231">231</a>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>.</li> + +<li>Omar Pasha Lutfi, partisan of ex-Khedive Ismaïl, Governor of +Alexandria, later War Minister, his connection with the Alexandrian +riots, <a href="#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, +<a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href= +"#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_63">63</a>, <a href= +"#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href= +"#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#appb">Appendices B</a> and <a href= +"#appc">C.</a></li> + +<li>Omdurman taken by the Mahdi, January 1885, <a href= +"#Page_363">363</a>.</li> + +<li>Osborn, Colonel, friend of Native India, <a href= +"#Page_220">220</a>.</li> + +<li>O’Shea, Captain William, M.P., <a href= +"#Page_429">429</a>.</li> + +<li>Osman, Prince, cousin of the Khedive, <a href= +"#Page_326">326</a>.</li> + +<li>Osman Digna, the Emir, Mahdist leader, <a href= +"#Page_54">54</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href= +"#Page_200">200</a>, <a href="#Page_203">203</a>, <a href= +"#Page_394">394</a>, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>, <a href= +"#Page_426">426</a>, <a href="#Page_437">437</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Paget, Sir Augustus, Ambassador at Vienna, and +Lady Paget, <a href="#Page_287">287</a>.</li> + +<li>Pain, Olivier, French Socialist, reward offered for him dead or +alive, <a href="#Page_442">442</a>, <a href= +"#Page_486">486</a>.</li> + +<li>“Pall Mall Gazette,” the, <a href="#Page_152">152</a>, <a href= +"#Page_154">154</a>; its change of front about Egypt, <a href= +"#Page_161">161</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, +<a href="#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>, <a href= +"#Page_167">167</a>, <a href="#Page_168">168</a>, <a href= +"#Page_169">169</a>, <a href="#Page_183">183</a>, <a href= +"#Page_223">223</a>, <a href="#Page_227">227</a>, <a href= +"#Page_247">247</a>, <a href="#Page_253">253</a>, <a href= +"#Page_255">255</a>, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>, <a href= +"#Page_350">350</a>, <a href="#Page_351">351</a>, <a href= +"#Page_353">353</a>, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>.</li> + +<li>Palmer, Mr. Edward, Professor of Arabic at Cambridge, +vengeance<span class="pagenum" id="Page_660">[660]</span> taken on +Bedouins for his death, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href= +"#Page_23">23</a>; debates in Parliament, <a href= +"#Page_28">28</a>; Consul West on the Palmer case, <a href= +"#Page_53">53</a>; Northbrook’s responsibility for, <a href= +"#Page_179">179</a>.</li> + +<li>Parnell, Mr. Charles Stuart, M.P., <a href="#Page_251">251</a>, +<a href="#Page_270">270</a>, <a href="#Page_272">272</a>, <a href= +"#Page_273">273</a>, <a href="#Page_379">379</a>, <a href= +"#Page_412">412</a>, <a href="#Page_414">414</a>, <a href= +"#Page_415">415</a>, <a href="#Page_422">422</a>, <a href= +"#Page_423">423</a>, <a href="#Page_429">429</a>; author’s talk +with, <a href="#Page_427">427</a>, <a href= +"#Page_428">428</a>.</li> + +<li>Pauncefote, Sir Julian, permanent Under-Secretary of State, +afterwards Ambassador in America, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>.</li> + +<li>Peace and Arbitration Association, <a href="#Page_352">352</a>, +<a href="#Page_353">353</a>, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>, <a href= +"#Page_356">356</a>, <a href="#Page_431">431</a>.</li> + +<li>Penjdeh, <a href="#Page_467">467</a>.</li> + +<li>Petitt, match between Lambert and, professional tennis player, +<a href="#Page_435">435</a>.</li> + +<li>Poles and Ruthenians, <a href="#Page_290">290</a>, <a href= +"#Page_294">294</a>.</li> + +<li>Policy, Prussian, of claiming the old Dutch colonies, <a href= +"#Page_396">396</a>.</li> + +<li>Pollen, Mr. John Hungerford, secretary to Lord Ripon, friend of +the author, <a href="#Page_363">363</a>, <a href= +"#Page_432">432</a>, <a href="#Page_465">465</a>.</li> + +<li>Poore, Major R., disciple of Urquhart, <a href= +"#Page_377">377</a>.</li> + +<li>Potocki, Count Alfred, at Crabbet, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>, +<a href="#Page_222">222</a>; author’s visit to him at Lançut, +<a href="#Page_289">289</a>, <a href="#Page_290">290</a>, <a href= +"#Page_291">291</a>, <a href="#Page_292">292</a>; at Antonine, +<a href="#Page_293">293</a>, <a href="#Page_294">294</a>; his Arab +stud, <a href="#Page_295">295</a>, <a href= +"#Page_296">296</a>.</li> + +<li>Pratt, Mr. Hodgson, philanthropist, organizer of the Peace and +Arbitration Society, <a href="#Page_352">352</a>, <a href= +"#Page_353">353</a>.</li> + +<li>Press, use made of by Governments, <a href="#Page_117">117</a>, +<a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href= +"#Page_164">164</a>, <a href="#Page_165">165</a>, <a href= +"#Page_166">166</a>, <a href="#Page_250">250</a>, <a href= +"#Page_369">369</a>.</li> + +<li>Primrose Day with Churchill, <a href="#Page_418">418</a>.</li> + +<li>Proteus, Love sonnets of, “Mr. Gladstone turns to with +delight,” <a href="#Page_433">433</a>.</li> + +<li>Punch Dinner, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Quakers against peace, <a href= +"#Page_378">378</a>.</li> + +<li>Queen. <em>See</em> Victoria.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Ragheb Nashid, <a href="#Page_276">276</a>.</li> + +<li>Ragunath Rao, Rajah, a letter from, <a href= +"#Page_494">494</a>.</li> + +<li>Rafaat, Osman Bey, secret agent of the Khedive, <a href= +"#Page_324">324</a>, <a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>.</li> + +<li>Rama Swami, Indian delegate, <a href="#Page_494">494</a>, +<a href="#Page_499">499</a>.</li> + +<li>Raouf Pasha, Governor-General of Soudan in succession to +Gordon, <a href="#Page_10">10</a>, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>.</li> + +<li>Red Sea, origin of the name, <a href="#Page_314">314</a>.</li> + +<li>Reform in <em>Foreign Policy</em>, author’s lecture on, +<a href="#Page_497">497</a>.</li> + +<li>Reign of Terror at Cairo, <a href="#Page_66">66</a>.</li> + +<li>Riaz Pasha, Prime Minister in Egypt, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, +<a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_55">55</a>, <a href= +"#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_126">126</a>, <a href= +"#Page_131">131</a>, <a href="#Page_146">146</a>, <a href= +"#Page_243">243</a>, <a href="#Page_251">251</a>, <a href= +"#Page_336">336</a>.</li> + +<li>Ripon, Marquess of, Viceroy of India, <a href= +"#Page_58">58</a>, <a href="#Page_133">133</a>, <a href= +"#Page_134">134</a>, <a href="#Page_239">239</a>, <a href= +"#Page_251">251</a>, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>, <a href= +"#Page_363">363</a>, <a href="#Page_375">375</a>, <a href= +"#Page_397">397</a>, <a href="#Page_412">412</a>, <a href= +"#Page_413">413</a>, <a href="#Page_432">432</a>, <a href= +"#Page_450">450</a>, <a href="#Page_452">452</a>, <a href= +"#Page_465">465</a>.</li> + +<li>Roberts, General Sir Frederic, now Field-Marshal Earl Roberts, +<a href="#Page_430">430</a>.</li> + +<li>Rosebery, Earl of, afterwards Prime Minister, his connection +with the Rothschilds, <a href="#Page_395">395</a>; his connection +with the Turf, <a href="#Page_237">237</a>.</li> + +<li>Rothschild, Nathaniel Lord, <a href="#Page_229">229</a>, +<a href="#Page_242">242</a>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href= +"#Page_272">272</a>.</li> + +<li>Rothschilds, Messieurs, their connection with the “Times,” +<a href="#Page_213">213</a>; Bismarck’s quarrel with, in Frankfort, +<a href="#Page_260">260</a>; holders of Egyptian Stock, <a href= +"#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>, <a href= +"#Page_214">214</a>, <a href="#Page_350">350</a>.</li> + +<li>Russia and Afghanistan, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>, <a href= +"#Page_466">466</a>.</li> + +<li>Russia and India, <a href="#Page_444">444</a>, <a href= +"#Page_466">466</a>, <a href="#Page_467">467</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_661">[661]</span>Saad-el-Zaglool Effendi, assistant editor of +the “Wakaya” under Mohammed Abdu, Minister of Public Instruction +under Cromer, 1906, now Minister of Justice, in prison, <a href= +"#Page_71">71</a>; author procures his release, <a href= +"#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>.</li> + +<li>Sabit Pasha, Tewfik’s agent at Constantinople, <a href= +"#Page_305">305</a>.</li> + +<li>Sabunji, Rev. Louis, editor of “Nahlek,” Oriental secretary to +author, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, +<a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, <a href= +"#Page_66">66</a>, <a href="#Page_74">74</a>, <a href= +"#Page_76">76</a>, <a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>.</li> + +<li>Salisbury, Marquess of, <a href="#Page_73">73</a>, <a href= +"#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href= +"#Page_252">252</a>, <a href="#Page_255">255</a>, <a href= +"#Page_320">320</a>, <a href="#Page_321">321</a>, <a href= +"#Page_332">332</a>, <a href="#Page_391">391</a>, <a href= +"#Page_446">446</a>, <a href="#Page_452">452</a>, <a href= +"#Page_465">465</a>, <a href="#Page_468">468</a>, <a href= +"#Page_472">472</a>, <a href="#Page_478">478</a>, <a href= +"#Page_486">486</a>, <a href="#Page_487">487</a>, <a href= +"#Page_493">493</a>, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>, <a href= +"#Page_501">501</a>, <a href="#Page_502">502</a>, <a href= +"#Page_503">503</a>, <a href="#Page_505">505</a>; takes office, +<a href="#Page_448">448</a>, <a href="#Page_449">449</a>; engages +to support Tewfik, <a href="#Page_457">457</a>; author’s +correspondence with, <a href="#appc">Appendix C</a>.</li> + +<li>Sami, Mahmoud Pasha, el Barodi, Nationalist ex-Prime Minister, +exiled with Arabi, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href= +"#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_276">276</a>, <a href= +"#Page_324">324</a>.</li> + +<li>Sanguscko, Prince, <a href="#Page_294">294</a>.</li> + +<li>Sanua, James (Sheykh Abu Naddara), Egyptian Nationalist living +in exile at Paris, and editor of “Abu Naddara,” author visits him +at Paris, <a href="#Page_45">45</a>; his puppet show and +newspapers, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href= +"#Page_47">47</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href= +"#Page_208">208</a>, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, <a href= +"#Page_387">387</a>, <a href="#Page_388">388</a>.</li> + +<li>Saoud el Tihawi, Sheykh, Bedouin Sheykh, his action at +Tel-el-Kebir, “in the pay of both sides,” <a href= +"#Page_323">323</a>.</li> + +<li>Saracens, Arab chivalry inherited from, <a href= +"#Page_362">362</a>.</li> + +<li>Selborne, Lord Chancellor, <a href="#Page_406">406</a>.</li> + +<li>Seljukian Sultans, descendants of, at Konia, <a href= +"#Page_301">301</a>.</li> + +<li>Seymour, Admiral Sir Beauchamp, Lord Alcester, his proclamation +after bombarding Alexandria, <a href="#Page_2">2</a>, <a href= +"#Page_475">475</a>.</li> + +<li>Seymour, Mr. Walter, friend of the author, <a href= +"#Page_370">370</a>, <a href="#Page_382">382</a>, <a href= +"#Page_456">456</a>.</li> + +<li>Shaftesbury, Lord, his warning to the Prince of Wales, <a href= +"#Page_282">282</a>.</li> + +<li>Shakespeare, “As You Like It” in open air, <a href= +"#Page_446">446</a>.</li> + +<li>Sheffield, Mr. George, private secretary to Lord Lyons at +Paris, considers Gordon’s case hopeless, <a href= +"#Page_209">209</a>; author’s conversations with, <a href= +"#Page_344">344</a>, <a href="#Page_345">345</a>, <a href= +"#Page_346">346</a>, <a href="#Page_410">410</a>. <em>Also</em> +<a href="#Page_284">284</a>, <a href="#Page_359">359</a>.</li> + +<li>Shemsi, Emin Bey, Nationalist deputy in 1882, <a href= +"#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href= +"#Page_73">73</a>.</li> + +<li>Sherif Pasha, Prime Minister in 1883, <a href= +"#Page_30">30</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href= +"#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href= +"#Page_101">101</a>, <a href="#Page_102">102</a>, <a href= +"#Page_124">124</a>, <a href="#Page_125">125</a>, <a href= +"#Page_126">126</a>, <a href="#Page_128">128</a>, <a href= +"#Page_151">151</a>, <a href="#Page_156">156</a>, <a href= +"#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="#Page_233">233</a>, <a href= +"#Page_243">243</a>.</li> + +<li>Sidki, Mustafa Bey, landed proprietor at Shubra, imprisoned in +1883, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>.</li> + +<li>Sinadino, M. Ambroise, Greek banker at Alexandria and agent of +the Rothschilds, “Mecca pilgrims kept without water,” <a href= +"#Page_298">298</a>.</li> + +<li>Sinnett, Mr. A. P., well-known Theosophist, he explains the +black art, <a href="#Page_258">258</a>, <a href= +"#Page_259">259</a>.</li> + +<li>Siva Prasad, Rajah, says a royal order would override caste +difficulties, <a href="#Page_496">496</a>.</li> + +<li>Slavery, two ways of dealing with, <a href= +"#Page_96">96</a>-99.</li> + +<li>Slagg, Mr., M.P., his motion for an inquiry into Indian +Government, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>.</li> + +<li>Souakin, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>, <a href= +"#Page_380">380</a>, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>, <a href= +"#Page_402">402</a>, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>, <a href= +"#Page_416">416</a>, <a href="#Page_426">426</a>, <a href= +"#Page_427">427</a>, <a href="#Page_455">455</a>.</li> + +<li>Spencer, Earl, <a href="#Page_391">391</a>; a born +administrator, <a href="#Page_268">268</a>.</li> + +<li>Staal, M. de, Russian Ambassador in London, friend of +author,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_662">[662]</span> <a href= +"#Page_222">222</a>, <a href="#Page_269">269</a>, <a href= +"#Page_298">298</a>, <a href="#Page_436">436</a>, <a href= +"#Page_445">445</a>, <a href="#Page_446">446</a>, <a href= +"#Page_452">452</a>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>.</li> + +<li>Stanley of Alderley, Henry, Lord, friend of the author, +<a href="#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_242">242</a>, <a href= +"#Page_245">245</a>, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>, <a href= +"#Page_308">308</a>, <a href="#Page_310">310</a>, <a href= +"#Page_342">342</a>, <a href="#Page_345">345</a>, <a href= +"#Page_361">361</a>, <a href="#Page_367">367</a>, <a href= +"#Page_372">372</a>, <a href="#Page_377">377</a>, <a href= +"#Page_394">394</a>, <a href="#Page_407">407</a>, <a href= +"#Page_416">416</a>, <a href="#Page_452">452</a>.</li> + +<li>Stanley, Lady, of Alderley, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>, +<a href="#Page_371">371</a>.</li> + +<li>Stanley, Hon. Lyulph, M.P., afterwards Lord Sheffield, friend +of author, <a href="#Page_212">212</a>.</li> + +<li>Stead, Mr. William, editor of the “Pall Mall Gazette,” +1883-1885, Gordon’s mission unjustly attributed to by Cromer in +“Modern Egypt,” <a href="#Page_152">152</a>, <a href= +"#Page_153">153</a>, <a href="#Page_162">162</a>, <a href= +"#Page_165">165</a>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a>, <a href= +"#Page_167">167</a>, <a href="#Page_168">168</a>; he interviews +Gordon at Southampton, <a href="#Page_164">164</a>, <a href= +"#Page_171">171</a>; used by the Whigs, <a href= +"#Page_169">169</a>; his “scream of triumph,” <a href= +"#Page_183">183</a>; author interviewed by, <a href= +"#Page_220">220</a>, <a href="#Page_221">221</a>, <a href= +"#Page_351">351</a>, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>, <a href= +"#Page_354">354</a>, <a href="#Page_355">355</a>; described by +Morley, <a href="#Page_253">253</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href= +"#Page_158">158</a>, <a href="#Page_170">170</a>, <a href= +"#Page_176">176</a>, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>, <a href= +"#Page_426">426</a>, <a href="#Page_447">447</a>, <a href= +"#Page_484">484</a>.</li> + +<li>Stewart, Colonel D. H., <a href="#Page_81">81</a>, <a href= +"#Page_146">146</a>, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>, <a href= +"#Page_148">148</a>, <a href="#Page_179">179</a>, <a href= +"#Page_181">181</a>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>, <a href= +"#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_196">196</a>, <a href= +"#Page_365">365</a>; author’s recollection of, <a href= +"#Page_287">287</a>, <a href="#Page_299">299</a>, <a href= +"#appf">Appendix F</a>.</li> + +<li>Stewart, General Sir Herbert, in command of the relief column, +killed at Abu Klea, <a href="#Page_362">362</a>, <a href= +"#Page_364">364</a>, <a href="#Page_367">367</a>, <a href= +"#Page_368">368</a>, <a href="#Page_379">379</a>, <a href= +"#Page_406">406</a>.</li> + +<li>Suliman Sami Bey, Nationalist Colonel of the Alexandria +garrison, hanged by the Khedive, <a href="#Page_23">23</a>, +<a href="#Page_24">24</a>; refused to give up certain papers +incriminating the Khedive, <a href="#Page_69">69</a>, <a href= +"#appb">Appendix B</a>.</li> + +<li>Sullivan, Sir Arthur, musical composer, <a href= +"#Page_413">413</a>.</li> + +<li>Sullivan, Sir Edward, Bart., <a href="#Page_419">419</a>.</li> + +<li>Sultan, the Ottoman. <em>See</em> Abdul Hamid.</li> + +<li>Sultan Pasha, fellah Notable and Constitutionalist, betrayed +the Nationalists to the Khedive in 1882, and accompanied Wolseley +on the campaign of Tel-el-Kebir; received £10,000 and a knighthood +from the British Government, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href= +"#Page_50">50</a>, <a href="#Page_71">71</a>, <a href= +"#Page_72">72</a>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>, <a href= +"#Page_324">324</a>, <a href="#appb">Appendix B</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Talbot, General the Hon. Sir Reginald, <a href= +"#Page_367">367</a>.</li> + +<li>Tamai, battle of, <a href="#Page_409">409</a>.</li> + +<li>Tantah, riots at, evidence in regard to, <a href= +"#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_21">21</a>, <a href= +"#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_324">324</a>, <a href= +"#Page_325">325</a>, <a href="#Page_334">334</a>. <em>Also</em> +<a href="#appb">Appendices B,</a> <a href="#appc">C,</a> <a href= +"#appf">F.</a></li> + +<li>Taschaud, M., <a href="#Page_381">381</a>.</li> + +<li>Tebbutt, Mr. Charles, banker of St. Ives, political friend of +author, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>.</li> + +<li>Tel-el-Kebir, battle of, <a href="#Page_3">3</a>, <a href= +"#Page_6">6</a>, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>, <a href= +"#Page_36">36</a>, <a href="#Page_46">46</a>, <a href= +"#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_65">65</a>, <a href= +"#Page_74">74</a>, <a href="#Page_75">75</a>, <a href= +"#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_79">79</a>, <a href= +"#Page_201">201</a>; traitors at, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>; +described by Arabi’s doctor, <a href="#Page_323">323</a>.</li> + +<li>Temple, Dr., Bishop of Exeter, afterwards Bishop of London, +Gordon’s visit to, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>; party at Fulham, +<a href="#Page_451">451</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href= +"#Page_139">139</a>, <a href="#Page_172">172</a>, <a href= +"#Page_243">243</a>.</li> + +<li>Temple, Sir Richard, ex-Indian official, afterwards M.P., +<a href="#Page_498">498</a>.</li> + +<li>Tennis at Hampton Court, <a href="#Page_434">434</a>, <a href= +"#Page_435">435</a>.</li> + +<li>Tewfik, Khedive, an impediment to an honest settlement in +Egypt, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href="#Page_7">7</a>, <a href= +"#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_17">17</a>, <a href= +"#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_56">56</a>, <a href= +"#Page_65">65</a>, <a href="#Page_68">68</a>, <a href= +"#Page_77">77</a>, <a href="#Page_80">80</a>, <a href= +"#Page_81">81</a>, <a href="#Page_82">82</a>, <a href= +"#Page_83">83</a>, <a href="#Page_141">141</a>, <a href= +"#Page_217">217</a>, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>, <a href= +"#Page_414">414</a>, <a href="#Page_454">454</a>, <a href= +"#Page_457">457</a>; his connection with the riots, <a href= +"#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_31">31</a>, <a href= +"#Page_52">52</a>, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>, <a href= +"#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#appb">Appendices B,</a> <a href= +"#appc">C;</a> his weak and treacherous character, <a href= +"#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href= +"#Page_249">249</a>, <a href="#Page_411">411</a>; Gordon’s quarrel +with,<span class="pagenum" id="Page_663">[663]</span> <a href= +"#Page_122">122</a>; he makes peace with Gordon, <a href= +"#Page_197">197</a>; his firman to Gordon, <a href= +"#Page_197">197</a>; Arabi’s attitude towards, <a href= +"#appb">Appendix B</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, +<a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_11">11</a>, <a href= +"#Page_13">13</a>, <a href="#Page_16">16</a>, <a href= +"#Page_19">19</a>, <a href="#Page_20">20</a>, <a href= +"#Page_21">21</a>, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href= +"#Page_24">24</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href= +"#Page_33">33</a>, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href= +"#Page_48">48</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href= +"#Page_55">55</a>, <a href="#Page_62">62</a>, <a href= +"#Page_64">64</a>, <a href="#Page_67">67</a>, <a href= +"#Page_69">69</a>, <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href= +"#Page_71">71</a>, <a href="#Page_72">72</a>, <a href= +"#Page_73">73</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href= +"#Page_120">120</a>, <a href="#Page_122">122</a>, <a href= +"#Page_130">130</a>, <a href="#Page_131">131</a>, <a href= +"#Page_140">140</a>, <a href="#Page_151">151</a>, <a href= +"#Page_153">153</a>, <a href="#Page_156">156</a>, <a href= +"#Page_157">157</a>, <a href="#Page_160">160</a>, <a href= +"#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_169">169</a>, <a href= +"#Page_170">170</a>, <a href="#Page_187">187</a>, <a href= +"#Page_189">189</a>, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>, <a href= +"#Page_194">194</a>, <a href="#Page_201">201</a>, <a href= +"#Page_212">212</a>, <a href="#Page_214">214</a>, <a href= +"#Page_218">218</a>, <a href="#Page_225">225</a>, <a href= +"#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>, <a href= +"#Page_232">232</a>, <a href="#Page_234">234</a>, <a href= +"#Page_253">253</a>, <a href="#Page_254">254</a>, <a href= +"#Page_266">266</a>, <a href="#Page_268">268</a>, <a href= +"#Page_284">284</a>, <a href="#Page_328">328</a>, <a href= +"#Page_336">336</a>, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>, <a href= +"#Page_360">360</a>, <a href="#Page_365">365</a>, <a href= +"#Page_366">366</a>, <a href="#Page_456">456</a>.</li> + +<li>Thebaw, King of Burmah, <a href="#Page_497">497</a>, <a href= +"#Page_502">502</a>; General Gloag’s letters about, <a href= +"#appg">Appendix G</a>.</li> + +<li>“Times,” the, <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, <a href= +"#Page_25">25</a>, <a href="#Page_30">30</a>, <a href= +"#Page_32">32</a>, <a href="#Page_76">76</a>, <a href= +"#Page_99">99</a>, <a href="#Page_153">153</a>, <a href= +"#Page_160">160</a>, <a href="#Page_161">161</a>, <a href= +"#Page_162">162</a>, <a href="#Page_166">166</a>, <a href= +"#Page_172">172</a>, <a href="#Page_175">175</a>, <a href= +"#Page_211">211</a>, <a href="#Page_213">213</a>, <a href= +"#Page_216">216</a>, <a href="#Page_219">219</a>, <a href= +"#Page_230">230</a>, <a href="#Page_231">231</a>, <a href= +"#Page_246">246</a>, <a href="#Page_248">248</a>, <a href= +"#Page_249">249</a>, <a href="#Page_253">253</a>, <a href= +"#Page_254">254</a>, <a href="#Page_257">257</a>, <a href= +"#Page_265">265</a>, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>, <a href= +"#Page_275">275</a>, <a href="#Page_354">354</a>, <a href= +"#Page_360">360</a>, <a href="#Page_361">361</a>, <a href= +"#Page_365">365</a>, <a href="#Page_367">367</a>, <a href= +"#Page_385">385</a>, <a href="#Page_397">397</a>, <a href= +"#Page_399">399</a>, <a href="#Page_426">426</a>, <a href= +"#Page_435">435</a>, <a href="#Page_445">445</a>, <a href= +"#Page_447">447</a>, <a href="#Page_455">455</a>, <a href= +"#Page_459">459</a>.</li> + +<li>Tory Democracy, “Am I a Tory Democrat?” <a href= +"#Page_429">429</a>, <a href="#Page_443">443</a>, <a href= +"#Page_444">444</a>, <a href="#Page_445">445</a>, <a href= +"#appd">Appendix D</a>; old Tories, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>. +<em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_414">414</a>, <a href= +"#Page_441">441</a>, <a href="#Page_463">463</a>, <a href= +"#Page_465">465</a>.</li> + +<li>Trevelyan, Rt. Hon. George, Bart., M.P., Chief Secretary for +Ireland, his description of Clifford Lloyd in Ireland, <a href= +"#Page_268">268</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_267">267</a>, +<a href="#Page_391">391</a>.</li> + +<li>Tulba Pasha, commander of garrison at Alexandria in 1882, +afterwards at Kafr Dawar, exiled with Arabi, <a href= +"#Page_63">63</a>, <a href="#Page_64">64</a>, <a href= +"#Page_324">324</a>.</li> + +<li>Turkey, dying, <a href="#Page_305">305</a>; ruined by +commercial treaties, <a href="#Page_307">307</a>; in Asia, <a href= +"#Page_342">342</a>; intended revolution in, <a href= +"#Page_490">490</a>, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>, <a href= +"#Page_493">493</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Urquhart, David, author of “Spirit of the East,” +<a href="#Page_377">377</a>; Cardinal Manning’s opinion of, +<a href="#Page_500">500</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Varkar, Mr. Chandra, <a href="#Page_496">496</a>, +<a href="#Page_499">499</a>.</li> + +<li>Vefyk Pasha, ex-Grand Vizier, <a href="#Page_242">242</a>, +<a href="#Page_245">245</a>, <a href="#Page_302">302</a>; “a man of +crotchets,” <a href="#Page_303">303</a>; author’s visit to “a most +remarkable man,” <a href="#Page_306">306</a>; “our Sultans +worthless,” <a href="#Page_307">307</a>; “the English have lost +their political sense,” <a href="#Page_308">308</a>; on the Sultan, +<a href="#Page_309">309</a>; on Egypt, <a href="#Page_310">310</a>, +<a href="#Page_311">311</a>; author breakfasts with him, <a href= +"#Page_313">313</a>; on Arabian history, <a href= +"#Page_314">314</a>; Count Corti’s opinion of, <a href= +"#Page_315">315</a>; his son, <a href="#Page_340">340</a>.</li> + +<li>“Vengeurs, Les,” <a href="#Page_70">70</a>, <a href= +"#appf">Appendix F</a>.</li> + +<li>Victoria, Queen, speech on opening Parliament, <a href= +"#Page_32">32</a>; her letter to Miss Gordon, <a href= +"#Page_204">204</a>, <a href="#Page_205">205</a>, <a href= +"#Page_206">206</a>, <a href="#appa">Appendix A</a>; Hassan Fehmy’s +audience with, <a href="#Page_369">369</a>.</li> + +<li>Villayet Ali, Nawab, <a href="#Page_296">296</a>.</li> + +<li>Villiers, Hon. Frank, Lord Salisbury’s private secretary, +afterwards Sir Francis Villiers, Ambassador at Lisbon, <a href= +"#Page_495">495</a>.</li> + +<li>Vivian, Hon. Crespigny, afterwards Lord, and Ambassador at +Rome, <a href="#Page_123">123</a>, <a href="#Page_127">127</a>, +<a href="#Page_128">128</a>.</li> + +<li>Volhynia, condition of peasantry in, <a href= +"#Page_298">298</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Waddington, M., French Ambassador in London, +<a href="#Page_254">254</a>; at the Congress of Berlin, <a href= +"#Page_320">320</a>, <a href="#Page_321">321</a>.</li> + +<li>Wagram, Prince, friend of author, author’s visit to, at Gros +Bois, <a href="#Page_284">284</a>, <a href="#Page_285">285</a>; +visits Windsor, <a href="#Page_479">479</a>.</li> + +<li>Wales, Prince of, afterwards King Edward VII, <a href= +"#Page_211">211</a>, <a href="#Page_235">235</a>, <a href= +"#Page_347">347</a>, <a href="#Page_348">348</a>, <a href= +"#Page_360">360</a>, <a href="#Page_368">368</a>, <a href= +"#Page_371">371</a>, <a href="#Page_392">392</a>, <a href= +"#Page_427">427</a>, <a href="#Page_447">447</a>.</li> + +<li><span class="pagenum" id="Page_664">[664]</span>Wallace, Sir +Mackenzie, <a href="#Page_318">318</a>.</li> + +<li>Walsham, Sir John, Bart., of the Diplomatic Service, <a href= +"#Page_287">287</a>, <a href="#Page_289">289</a>.</li> + +<li>Warren, Colonel, <a href="#Page_22">22</a>, <a href= +"#Page_23">23</a>; his method of dealing with Bedouins, <a href= +"#Page_53">53</a>.</li> + +<li>Watson, General Sir Charles, friend of Gordon, <a href= +"#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_194">194</a>, <a href= +"#Page_197">197</a>; his letters about Gordon, <a href= +"#appa">Appendix A</a>.</li> + +<li>Webb, Mr. Godfrey, clerk of the House of Lords, cousin of the +author, <a href="#Page_410">410</a>.</li> + +<li>Wentworth, Lord, afterwards Earl of Lovelace, brother-in-law of +author, <a href="#Page_432">432</a>, <a href= +"#Page_456">456</a>.</li> + +<li>West, Mr., British Consul at Suez, <a href="#Page_52">52</a>, +<a href="#Page_53">53</a>.</li> + +<li>Whittaker, Mr., editor of the “Levant Herald,” conversation +with author, <a href="#Page_303">303</a>, <a href= +"#Page_304">304</a>; on the Sultan’s method of dealing with +Ambassadors, <a href="#Page_316">316</a>; he explains Dufferin’s +failure, <a href="#Page_322">322</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href= +"#Page_368">368</a>, <a href="#Page_441">441</a>.</li> + +<li>Wilson, General Sir Charles, Consul in Asia Minor, afterwards +at Cairo and Khartoum, <a href="#Page_15">15</a>, <a href= +"#Page_20">20</a>, <a href="#Page_146">146</a>, <a href= +"#Page_170">170</a>, <a href="#Page_416">416</a>; author’s +recollection of, <a href="#Page_147">147</a>, <a href= +"#Page_149">149</a>; his letters relating to Gordon, <a href= +"#appa">Appendix A</a>.</li> + +<li>Wilson, Sir Rivers, Finance Minister in Egypt, friend of +author, <a href="#Page_93">93</a>, <a href="#Page_127">127</a>, +<a href="#Page_128">128</a>, <a href="#Page_129">129</a>, <a href= +"#Page_132">132</a>, <a href="#Page_226">226</a>, <a href= +"#Page_229">229</a>, <a href="#Page_230">230</a>, <a href= +"#Page_495">495</a>, <a href="#Page_496">496</a>; his recollection +of Gordon, <a href="#Page_132">132</a>.</li> + +<li>Windsor Park, <a href="#Page_439">439</a>.</li> + +<li>Winton, Mr. De, Anglo-Egyptian official, his talk with the +author on Egypt, <a href="#Page_277">277</a>.</li> + +<li>Wolff, Sir Henry Drummond, afterwards Ambassador, <a href= +"#Page_28">28</a>, <a href="#Page_211">211</a>, <a href= +"#Page_219">219</a>, <a href="#Page_220">220</a>, <a href= +"#Page_262">262</a>; his mission to Constantinople and Egypt, +<a href="#Page_456">456</a>; his plans in Egypt, <a href= +"#Page_473">473</a>; his conversations with Jemal-ed-Din, <a href= +"#Page_474">474</a>, <a href="#Page_475">475</a>, <a href= +"#Page_476">476</a>, <a href="#Page_477">477</a>. <em>Also</em> +<a href="#Page_360">360</a>, <a href="#Page_382">382</a>, <a href= +"#Page_390">390</a>, <a href="#Page_408">408</a>, <a href= +"#Page_413">413</a>, <a href="#Page_418">418</a>, <a href= +"#Page_436">436</a>, <a href="#Page_448">448</a>, <a href= +"#Page_449">449</a>, <a href="#Page_451">451</a>, <a href= +"#Page_454">454</a>, <a href="#Page_455">455</a>, <a href= +"#Page_458">458</a>, <a href="#Page_461">461</a>, <a href= +"#Page_480">480</a>, <a href="#Page_481">481</a>, <a href= +"#Page_488">488</a>, <a href="#Page_489">489</a>, <a href= +"#Page_490">490</a>, <a href="#Page_491">491</a>, <a href= +"#Page_494">494</a>, <a href="#Page_504">504</a>.</li> + +<li>Wolseley, Sir Garnet, afterwards Lord, <a href="#Page_1">1</a>, +<a href="#Page_4">4</a>, <a href="#Page_5">5</a>, <a href= +"#Page_8">8</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href= +"#Page_78">78</a>, <a href="#Page_150">150</a>, <a href= +"#Page_159">159</a>, <a href="#Page_173">173</a>, <a href= +"#Page_174">174</a>, <a href="#Page_177">177</a>, <a href= +"#Page_203">203</a>, <a href="#Page_204">204</a>, <a href= +"#Page_205">205</a>, <a href="#Page_226">226</a>, <a href= +"#Page_228">228</a>, <a href="#Page_236">236</a>, <a href= +"#Page_238">238</a>, <a href="#Page_275">275</a>, <a href= +"#Page_299">299</a>, <a href="#Page_342">342</a>, <a href= +"#Page_346">346</a>, <a href="#Page_347">347</a>, <a href= +"#Page_348">348</a>, <a href="#Page_349">349</a>, <a href= +"#Page_363">363</a>, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>, <a href= +"#Page_366">366</a>, <a href="#Page_374">374</a>, <a href= +"#Page_375">375</a>, <a href="#Page_386">386</a>, <a href= +"#Page_394">394</a>, <a href="#Page_400">400</a>, <a href= +"#Page_461">461</a>; his position at the Horse Guards, <a href= +"#Page_393">393</a>; his plan of campaign, <a href= +"#Page_406">406</a>; is angry with the Government, <a href= +"#Page_406">406</a>; and the Nile Expedition, <a href= +"#Page_415">415</a>, <a href="#Page_416">416</a>; wants to renew +Soudan campaign, <a href="#Page_425">425</a>, <a href= +"#Page_429">429</a>; resolution for recall of, <a href= +"#Page_431">431</a>; his return from Soudan, <a href= +"#Page_459">459</a>.</li> + +<li>Wood, General Sir Evelyn, in command of the army of occupation, +<a href="#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_51">51</a>, <a href= +"#Page_150">150</a>, <a href="#Page_194">194</a>, <a href= +"#Page_197">197</a>, <a href="#Page_201">201</a>.</li> + +<li>Wood, Mr. Martin, of the Arbitration and Peace Society, he +accompanies author to Hawarden, <a href="#Page_356">356</a>, +<a href="#Page_357">357</a>; at the National Liberal Club, <a href= +"#Page_435">435</a>.</li> + +<li>Wortley, Stuart, Colonel, <a href="#Page_373">373</a>.</li> + +<li>Wyndham, Rt. Hon. George, M.P., afterwards Chief Secretary for +Ireland, cousin of author, <a href="#Page_376">376</a>, <a href= +"#Page_419">419</a>, <a href="#Page_438">438</a>, <a href= +"#Page_442">442</a>.</li> + +<li>Wyndham, Sir Hugh, K.C.B., Secretary of Embassy at +Constantinople, <a href="#Page_298">298</a>, <a href= +"#Page_299">299</a>, <a href="#Page_301">301</a>, <a href= +"#Page_363">363</a>, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>, <a href= +"#Page_374">374</a>.</li> + +<li>Wyndham, Hon. Percy, M.P. for Cockermouth, cousin of the +author, <a href="#Page_236">236</a>, <a href="#Page_266">266</a>, +<a href="#Page_271">271</a>, <a href="#Page_274">274</a>, <a href= +"#Page_298">298</a>, <a href="#Page_299">299</a>, <a href= +"#Page_363">363</a>, <a href="#Page_364">364</a>, <a href= +"#Page_375">375</a>.</li> + +<li>Wynford, Lord, <a href="#Page_353">353</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst"><span class="pagenum" id= +"Page_665">[665]</span>Yildiz Palace, the Sultan at, <a href= +"#Page_327">327</a>; horses paraded at, <a href= +"#Page_341">341</a>.</li> + +<li>Yusri, Ismaíl, President of the Commission on the Tantah +massacres, <a href="#Page_325">325</a>.</li> + +<li class="ifrst">Zanzibar, Bismarck’s designs on, <a href= +"#Page_394">394</a>, <a href="#Page_395">395</a>.</li> + +<li>Zebehr Pasha, chief of the slave traders, <a href= +"#Page_116">116</a>, <a href="#Page_119">119</a>; recruits a +Soudanese force, <a href="#Page_190">190</a>, <a href= +"#Page_200">200</a>; would he have betrayed Gordon? <a href= +"#Page_191">191</a>; would have saved Gordon many mistakes, +<a href="#Page_192">192</a>; real reason for his arrest, <a href= +"#Page_403">403</a>. <em>Also</em> <a href="#Page_200">200</a>, +<a href="#Page_494">494</a>, <a href="#Page_495">495</a>.</li> + +<li>Zogheb Naghib, Syrian merchant of Alexandria, conversations +with the author on board ship, <a href="#Page_47">47</a>, <a href= +"#Page_49">49</a>, <a href="#Page_50">50</a>, <a href= +"#Page_51">51</a>.</li> +</ul> + +<p class="space-above2"> +</p> + +<hr class="decor width20"> + +<p class="center small">CHISWICK PRESS: PRINTED BY CHARLES +WHITTINGHAM AND CO.<br> +TOOKS COURT, CHANCERY LANE, LONDON.</p> + +<p class="space-above2 x-ebookmaker-drop"> +</p> + +<div class="footnotes"> +<h2>FOOTNOTES:</h2> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_1"></a><a href="#FNanchor_1"><span class= +"label">[1]</span></a>I find the following in my diary of 11th +December 1891: “Anne called on Princess Nazleh who told her that +she did not think the Khedive Abbas would hear of Arabi’s return. +Others say the contrary. She repeated what we already knew from her +that after Tel-el-Kebir Tewfik ordered two guillotines from France +for the execution of the ‘rebels.’ . . . Dufferin told Princess +Nazleh once in an unguarded moment that, if he had earlier known +the kind of man Tewfik was, he would have made the other (meaning +Arabi) Khedive.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_2"></a><a href="#FNanchor_2"><span class= +"label">[2]</span></a>See “Secret History.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_3"></a><a href="#FNanchor_3"><span class= +"label">[3]</span></a>See Lord Esher’s “To-day and To-morrow.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_4"></a><a href="#FNanchor_4"><span class= +"label">[4]</span></a>This is an allusion to certain Sheykhs of the +Teaha and Terrabin tribes in whom I was interested and who were in +prison at Jerusalem.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_5"></a><a href="#FNanchor_5"><span class= +"label">[5]</span></a>Raouf was afterwards named, in contempt of +equity, one of the judges on Arabi’s trial.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_6"></a><a href="#FNanchor_6"><span class= +"label">[6]</span></a>The Hon. Mark Napier, who, with Mr. A. M. +Broadley, had been counsel for Arabi at the trial.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_7"></a><a href="#FNanchor_7"><span class= +"label">[7]</span></a>The Rt. Hon. Robert Bourke, M.P., afterwards +Lord Connemara.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_8"></a><a href="#FNanchor_8"><span class= +"label">[8]</span></a>For Sir William and Lady Gregory see “Secret +History.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_9"></a><a href="#FNanchor_9"><span class= +"label">[9]</span></a>Mr. Chenery, then Editor of the “Times.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_10"></a><a href="#FNanchor_10"><span class= +"label">[10]</span></a>See “Secret History” and <a href= +"#appc">Appendix C.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_11"></a><a href="#FNanchor_11"><span class= +"label">[11]</span></a>Sir Evelyn Wood in command of the Army of +Occupation.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_12"></a><a href="#FNanchor_12"><span class= +"label">[12]</span></a>Gabriel Charmes, the well-known French +journalist, was the propounder of most of the fictions current +about my action before and during the war. He was angry with the +Nationalists for having knocked off the subsidies formerly allotted +to the foreign press at Cairo. The rifles were Winchester rifles +intended in reality for a new journey we thought of making to Nejd +but never set out on. The Reuter’s telegrams of the day mentioned +them as “seventeen <em>cases</em> of arms.” Several years +afterwards, while being shown over the citadel at Cairo by the then +English Commandant, I found my brass cannon and the rest of the +things that had been taken out of my house in store in the arsenal, +and having identified them got them restored to me.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_13"></a><a href="#FNanchor_13"><span class= +"label">[13]</span></a>Butros Pasha Ghali, the same who, having +served English interests in Egypt for many years, became in 1908 +Prime Minister, and was assassinated on the 20th of February 1910. +(See <a href="#Page_576">Appendix</a> as to the Patriarch.)</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_14"></a><a href="#FNanchor_14"><span class= +"label">[14]</span></a>This is the same Saad Zagloul who was made +Minister of Public Instruction by Cromer in 1906, and is now (1911) +Minister of Justice.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_15"></a><a href="#FNanchor_15"><span class= +"label">[15]</span></a>Examples of Gordon’s little judgement of +individuals he came personally in contact with may be found in +Samuel Baker, King Leopold, Henry Stanley, and Richard Burton, in +all of whom Gordon thought he had discovered elements of unselfish +humanitarian zeal akin to his own.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_16"></a><a href="#FNanchor_16"><span class= +"label">[16]</span></a>The “Duke of This,” who wanted a steamer, +and the “Duke of That,” who wanted a house, are not difficult of +recognition by those who remember the Egypt of that day. The Duke +of Sutherland especially, with his house speculations, must have +been in Gordon’s mind.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_17"></a><a href="#FNanchor_17"><span class= +"label">[17]</span></a>At one moment there was an idea of Gordon’s +going to Zanzibar, where there were points of difficulty needing +solution. I recollect something of this, and that a question had +been raised by the Sultan of Zanzibar in regard to the abolition of +slavery in his dominions. The Sultan was a very enlightened prince, +and would have willingly emancipated the whole of his slaves could +he have replaced them with free labourers, and he had made +application to the India Office for their consent to employ coolies +from Bombay to take their place, and I had some correspondence at +the time with Lord Lytton on the matter, though it led to no +result.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_18"></a><a href="#FNanchor_18"><span class= +"label">[18]</span></a>See <a href="#appa">Appendix.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_19"></a><a href="#FNanchor_19"><span class= +"label">[19]</span></a>See “Secret History.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_20"></a><a href="#FNanchor_20"><span class= +"label">[20]</span></a>The MS. of Sir William Butler’s +Autobiography, recently published, contained, I am told, a passage +which was struck out of the printed volume in the editing, to the +effect that not only did the Cairo Government of the day reject the +proposal of Gordon’s services, but that he was to have been refused +permission to land in Egypt had he proposed to do so on his way to +Jerusalem.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_21"></a><a href="#FNanchor_21"><span class= +"label">[21]</span></a>M. Biovès, in absolving our diplomacy of the +charge made against it by most Egyptian writers that the +abandonment of the Soudan was forced on the Khedive by Cromer with +an intention of taking the abandoned provinces for England later, +missed this point. The idea in 1883 was not perhaps of a full +acquisition by England of the Soudan, but certainly of a region +ruled by Englishmen in English interests, what Stead called +“Sarawaking the Soudan” after the model of Rajah Brooke’s +government in Borneo.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_22"></a><a href="#FNanchor_22"><span class= +"label">[22]</span></a>Compare “Secret History,” and also later +page.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_23"></a><a href="#FNanchor_23"><span class= +"label">[23]</span></a>See “Secret History.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_24"></a><a href="#FNanchor_24"><span class= +"label">[24]</span></a>See Fitzmaurice.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_25"></a><a href="#FNanchor_25"><span class= +"label">[25]</span></a>See “Secret History.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_26"></a><a href="#FNanchor_26"><span class= +"label">[26]</span></a>Colonel Chailé-Long, who served under Gordon +on the White Nile from 1874 to 1877, maintains with some show of +probability that it was arranged at this time between Gordon and +King Leopold that, although he was to go as Queen’s officer to +sever the Soudan from Egypt, he was ultimately to make over +Khartoum and the Upper Nile Provinces to the King as part of the +King’s Congo State.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_27"></a><a href="#FNanchor_27"><span class= +"label">[27]</span></a>It is worth noticing that these four +Ministers were precisely the four that had had most to do with the +original armed intervention in Egypt in 1882. Northbrook’s name is +especially ominous when we recollect that he was at the head of the +Admiralty at the time of the bombardment of Alexandria, and that it +was he who had dispatched Palmer, as he was now dispatching Gordon, +on his fatal mission, a mission which, like Gordon’s, was to begin +with an attempt to bribe Bedouin tribes, and was to lead to the +betrayal of the missioner and his repudiation by those who sent +him. There is extant a letter from Northbrook to Gordon (see +<a href="#Page_511">Appendix</a>), written just as he was starting, +telling him that he had ordered a man-of-war to carry him to +Souakin, and that there were £1,000 for his purposes which were +being entrusted for him to Admiral Hewett at Souakin, the very same +Admiral to whom Palmer had been sent, and from whom he had received +the money for buying up the tribes east of the Suez Canal.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_28"></a><a href="#FNanchor_28"><span class= +"label">[28]</span></a>The Hon. Lyulph Stanley, now Lord +Sheffield.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_29"></a><a href="#FNanchor_29"><span class= +"label">[29]</span></a>Colonel Burnaby, M.P., author of “The Ride +to Khiva,” afterwards killed at Abu Klea.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_30"></a><a href="#FNanchor_30"><span class= +"label">[30]</span></a>A retired Indian official and well-known +friend of native India, but out of favour with the India +Office.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_31"></a><a href="#FNanchor_31"><span class= +"label">[31]</span></a>The Hon. John and Mark Napier (see “Secret +History”). Also see Mrs. Allnatt’s letters in <a href= +"#appa">Appendix A.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_32"></a><a href="#FNanchor_32"><span class= +"label">[32]</span></a>M. de Staal, for twenty years Russian +Ambassador in London.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_33"></a><a href="#FNanchor_33"><span class= +"label">[33]</span></a>Berber surrendered to the Mahdi on 19th May; +after this Gordon had no chance of extricating himself from +Khartoum.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_34"></a><a href="#FNanchor_34"><span class= +"label">[34]</span></a>Edwin Egerton of the diplomatic service, +afterwards Sir Edwin Egerton, G.C.M.G., His Majesty’s Ambassador at +Madrid.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_35"></a><a href="#FNanchor_35"><span class= +"label">[35]</span></a>See <a href="#appc">Appendix C.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_36"></a><a href="#FNanchor_36"><span class= +"label">[36]</span></a>A political ally during the Arabi trial (see +“Secret History”).</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_37"></a><a href="#FNanchor_37"><span class= +"label">[37]</span></a>Compare Lord Cromer’s “Modern Egypt” as to +my position with the Foreign Office and at 10, Downing Street.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_38"></a><a href="#FNanchor_38"><span class= +"label">[38]</span></a>M.P. for Horsham.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_39"></a><a href="#FNanchor_39"><span class= +"label">[39]</span></a>The present Lord Napier of Magdala.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_40"></a><a href="#FNanchor_40"><span class= +"label">[40]</span></a>The Right Hon. James Lowther, M.P.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_41"></a><a href="#FNanchor_41"><span class= +"label">[41]</span></a>Sir C. Rivers Wilson (see “Secret +History”).</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_42"></a><a href="#FNanchor_42"><span class= +"label">[42]</span></a>The Hon. Henry Brand, M.P., Surveyor-General +of the Ordnance, afterwards 2nd Viscount Hampden.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_43"></a><a href="#FNanchor_43"><span class= +"label">[43]</span></a>The Right Hon. Sir William Harcourt, M.P., +Home Secretary, always a good friend to Egypt.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_44"></a><a href="#FNanchor_44"><span class= +"label">[44]</span></a>M. Jules Ferry, French Prime Minister.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_45"></a><a href="#FNanchor_45"><span class= +"label">[45]</span></a>Mr. O’Kelly, M.P., one of the Parnellite +members who had gone to Dongola as correspondent to the “Daily +News.” His article, “The Mahdi and his Men,” was much the best +account of the Mahdist movement yet published.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_46"></a><a href="#FNanchor_46"><span class= +"label">[46]</span></a>See <a href="#appb">Appendix B.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_47"></a><a href="#FNanchor_47"><span class= +"label">[47]</span></a>John Morley, M.P., now Lord Morley of +Blackburn.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_48"></a><a href="#FNanchor_48"><span class= +"label">[48]</span></a>Sir Donald Currie, an intimate friend of +Gladstone.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_49"></a><a href="#FNanchor_49"><span class= +"label">[49]</span></a>Sir George Campbell, M.P., had been formerly +Lieutenant-Governor of Bengal, a Liberal, and a strong friend of +native India.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_50"></a><a href="#FNanchor_50"><span class= +"label">[50]</span></a>The Hon. Percy Wyndham, M.P. for +Cockermouth.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_51"></a><a href="#FNanchor_51"><span class= +"label">[51]</span></a>The well-known Orientalist and friend of +Islam.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_52"></a><a href="#FNanchor_52"><span class= +"label">[52]</span></a>The Hon. Frederick Leveson-Gower, M.P.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_53"></a><a href="#FNanchor_53"><span class= +"label">[53]</span></a>Of the diplomatic service, now Sir Hugh +Wyndham, K.C.B.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_54"></a><a href="#FNanchor_54"><span class= +"label">[54]</span></a>See <a href="#Page_547">Appendix.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_55"></a><a href="#FNanchor_55"><span class= +"label">[55]</span></a>See “India Under Ripon.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_56"></a><a href="#FNanchor_56"><span class= +"label">[56]</span></a>See <em>ibid.</em></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_57"></a><a href="#FNanchor_57"><span class= +"label">[57]</span></a>Sir Michael Hicks Beach, now Lord St. +Aldwyn.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_58"></a><a href="#FNanchor_58"><span class= +"label">[58]</span></a>The Rev. Scott Holland, Canon of St. +Paul’s.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_59"></a><a href="#FNanchor_59"><span class= +"label">[59]</span></a>Henry, 2nd Lord Stanley of Alderley (see +“Secret History”).</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_60"></a><a href="#FNanchor_60"><span class= +"label">[60]</span></a>Lord Lymington, M.P., now Earl of +Portsmouth.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_61"></a><a href="#FNanchor_61"><span class= +"label">[61]</span></a>Afterwards Sir Frank Lascelles, G.C.B., +ambassador at Berlin (see “Secret History”).</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_62"></a><a href="#FNanchor_62"><span class= +"label">[62]</span></a>Compare <a href="#Page_172">page +172.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_63"></a><a href="#FNanchor_63"><span class= +"label">[63]</span></a>Thomas Gibson Bowles, M.P.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_64"></a><a href="#FNanchor_64"><span class= +"label">[64]</span></a>Montague Corry, Lord Beaconsfield’s private +secretary, afterwards Lord Rowton.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_65"></a><a href="#FNanchor_65"><span class= +"label">[65]</span></a>Thomas Burt, M.P., the first Labour Member +in the House of Commons.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_66"></a><a href="#FNanchor_66"><span class= +"label">[66]</span></a>See <a href="#Page_641">Appendix.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_67"></a><a href="#FNanchor_67"><span class= +"label">[67]</span></a>The Right Hon. W. G. Forster, M.P.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_68"></a><a href="#FNanchor_68"><span class= +"label">[68]</span></a>Leigh of Lyme, in the diplomatic service, +now Lord Newton.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_69"></a><a href="#FNanchor_69"><span class= +"label">[69]</span></a>The Right Hon. George Wyndham, M.P.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_70"></a><a href="#FNanchor_70"><span class= +"label">[70]</span></a>A Conservative M.P.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_71"></a><a href="#FNanchor_71"><span class= +"label">[71]</span></a>The Right Hon. Sir George Trevelyan, Chief +Secretary for Ireland. He had been Under Secretary to the Admiralty +during the bombardment of Alexandria.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_72"></a><a href="#FNanchor_72"><span class= +"label">[72]</span></a>Sir James Carmichael, M.P.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_73"></a><a href="#FNanchor_73"><span class= +"label">[73]</span></a>The well-known philanthropist.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_74"></a><a href="#FNanchor_74"><span class= +"label">[74]</span></a>This is the portrait which forms the +frontispiece of my “Secret History,” a very excellent likeness.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_75"></a><a href="#FNanchor_75"><span class= +"label">[75]</span></a>See <a href="#appe2">Appendix.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_76"></a><a href="#FNanchor_76"><span class= +"label">[76]</span></a>This is where Lord Stanley was afterwards +buried.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_77"></a><a href="#FNanchor_77"><span class= +"label">[77]</span></a>My cousin, Francis Gore Currie.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_78"></a><a href="#FNanchor_78"><span class= +"label">[78]</span></a>Consul and keeper of the Embassy +archives.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_79"></a><a href="#FNanchor_79"><span class= +"label">[79]</span></a>My recollection of Bismarck on this occasion +is of a tall thin man making himself very agreeable to Lady Malet +and me—there was no one else present—and talking excellent +English.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_80"></a><a href="#FNanchor_80"><span class= +"label">[80]</span></a>Sir John Walsham, Bart.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_81"></a><a href="#FNanchor_81"><span class= +"label">[81]</span></a>Sir Victor Drummond, K.C.M.G., afterwards +Her Majesty’s Minister at Munich.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_82"></a><a href="#FNanchor_82"><span class= +"label">[82]</span></a>See “India Under Ripon.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_83"></a><a href="#FNanchor_83"><span class= +"label">[83]</span></a>Admiral the Hon. Augustus Hobart, for many +years in the Sultan’s service.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_84"></a><a href="#FNanchor_84"><span class= +"label">[84]</span></a>See “India under Ripon.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_85"></a><a href="#FNanchor_85"><span class= +"label">[85]</span></a>So, too, the Red Sea, or Phoenician Sea, as +to the meaning of which there have been so many conjectures. The +name Bahr el Ahmar was formerly applied both to the Red Sea and to +the Persian Gulf, both of them originally the homes of the +Phoenicians, whose Arabic tribe name, Beni Himyar, Children of the +Red, was turned by the Greeks into Phoenicians from the Greek word +<em>phoenix</em>, red. I offer this solution of the name puzzle to +philologists, having no pretension to be one myself.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_86"></a><a href="#FNanchor_86"><span class= +"label">[86]</span></a>Also see <a href= +"#Page_555">Appendix.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_87"></a><a href="#FNanchor_87"><span class= +"label">[87]</span></a>Compare Appendix to “Secret History” (Second +edition).</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_88"></a><a href="#FNanchor_88"><span class= +"label">[88]</span></a>Mohammed Aarif Bey, afterwards well known at +Cairo where he played many parts, among others that of private +secretary to Mukhtar Pasha Ghazi.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_89"></a><a href="#FNanchor_89"><span class= +"label">[89]</span></a>See “Secret History.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_90"></a><a href="#FNanchor_90"><span class= +"label">[90]</span></a>See <a href="#appb2">Appendix.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_91"></a><a href="#FNanchor_91"><span class= +"label">[91]</span></a>See <a href="#appc">Appendix C.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_92"></a><a href="#FNanchor_92"><span class= +"label">[92]</span></a>This relates to a personal explanation made +by Lord Northbrook on the 19th, in which he had treated the “Times” +correspondent in Egypt, Moberly Bell, with the greatest severity, +and the “Times” also as a publisher of false news.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_93"></a><a href="#FNanchor_93"><span class= +"label">[93]</span></a>See “India under Ripon.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_94"></a><a href="#FNanchor_94"><span class= +"label">[94]</span></a>The report of Mohammed Bey Obeyd’s having +escaped to the Soudan was long prevalent. But it is certain now +that he was killed at Tel-el-Kebir.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_95"></a><a href="#FNanchor_95"><span class= +"label">[95]</span></a>Khartoum fell on 26th January. The news +reached London on 5th February; Gordon’s death not known till the +10th February.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_96"></a><a href="#FNanchor_96"><span class= +"label">[96]</span></a>General Sir Herbert Stewart in command of +the relief column.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_97"></a><a href="#FNanchor_97"><span class= +"label">[97]</span></a>The Hon. Charles Hardinge, of the diplomatic +service, private secretary to Lord Dufferin at Constantinople, now +Lord Hardinge of Penshurst, Viceroy of India.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_98"></a><a href="#FNanchor_98"><span class= +"label">[98]</span></a>Field Marshal Lord Lucan, an ancient Crimean +hero.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_99"></a><a href="#FNanchor_99"><span class= +"label">[99]</span></a>I leave this epithet as it stands in my +diary, explaining only that of course it does not apply to Lord +Esher’s private character, but only to his official intrigues as +Lord Hartington’s private secretary.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_100"></a><a href="#FNanchor_100"><span class= +"label">[100]</span></a>General Lord Mark Kerr.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_101"></a><a href="#FNanchor_101"><span class= +"label">[101]</span></a>Seyd Huseyn Bilgrami, afterwards Member of +Council.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_102"></a><a href="#FNanchor_102"><span class= +"label">[102]</span></a>General Sir Charles Wilson, who on the +death of General Stewart had taken command of the relief +expedition.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_103"></a><a href="#FNanchor_103"><span class= +"label">[103]</span></a>Sir Henry Austin Lee, K.C.M.G., private +secretary to Lord E. Fitzmaurice at the Foreign Office, now English +representative on the Suez Canal Committee.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_104"></a><a href="#FNanchor_104"><span class= +"label">[104]</span></a>The Sultan at no time wished to restore +Ismaïl; but Ismaïl had come to London to push on the interests of +his restoration to Egypt in the English press. He was helped in +this by Broadley, Stead, and Madame de Novikof.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_105"></a><a href="#FNanchor_105"><span class= +"label">[105]</span></a>Seyd Nebbi Ullah Khan of Lucknow.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_106"></a><a href="#FNanchor_106"><span class= +"label">[106]</span></a>The Hon. Sir Michael Herbert, of the Paris +Embassy, afterwards Ambassador at Washington.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_107"></a><a href="#FNanchor_107"><span class= +"label">[107]</span></a>Sir Edward and Lady Blount of Paris.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_108"></a><a href="#FNanchor_108"><span class= +"label">[108]</span></a>Now Lord Courtney of Penwith.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_109"></a><a href="#FNanchor_109"><span class= +"label">[109]</span></a>See <a href="#Page_596">Appendix.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_110"></a><a href="#FNanchor_110"><span class= +"label">[110]</span></a>See <a href="#appb">Appendix B.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_111"></a><a href="#FNanchor_111"><span class= +"label">[111]</span></a>The Right Hon. Sydney Buxton, M.P.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_112"></a><a href="#FNanchor_112"><span class= +"label">[112]</span></a>See <a href="#appg">Appendix G.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_113"></a><a href="#FNanchor_113"><span class= +"label">[113]</span></a>Compare Sir Charles Wilson and also Sir +William Butler.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_114"></a><a href="#FNanchor_114"><span class= +"label">[114]</span></a>This is interesting as showing that the +idea of what was afterwards Wolff’s Convention was already being +thought of in Gladstone’s time.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_115"></a><a href="#FNanchor_115"><span class= +"label">[115]</span></a>Compare the Marchand mission of a dozen +years later.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_116"></a><a href="#FNanchor_116"><span class= +"label">[116]</span></a>Compare Gordon’s diary at Khartoum and my +letter to Lord Dufferin in <a href="#appc">Appendix C.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_117"></a><a href="#FNanchor_117"><span class= +"label">[117]</span></a>Captain William O’Shea, M.P., of lugubrious +memory. I had been at school with him.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_118"></a><a href="#FNanchor_118"><span class= +"label">[118]</span></a>Compare his book “Modern Egypt.”</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_119"></a><a href="#FNanchor_119"><span class= +"label">[119]</span></a>See <a href="#Page_610">Appendix.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_120"></a><a href="#FNanchor_120"><span class= +"label">[120]</span></a>The Conservative Party agent.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_121"></a><a href="#FNanchor_121"><span class= +"label">[121]</span></a>Field-Marshal Lord Roberts.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_122"></a><a href="#FNanchor_122"><span class= +"label">[122]</span></a>Schomberg, 9th Marquess of Lothian. I had +been with him as his fellow <em>attaché</em> at the Frankfort +Legation in 1861-2, when we had been close friends.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_123"></a><a href="#FNanchor_123"><span class= +"label">[123]</span></a>Lady Archibald Campbell.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_124"></a><a href="#FNanchor_124"><span class= +"label">[124]</span></a>See <a href="#Page_611">Appendix.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_125"></a><a href="#FNanchor_125"><span class= +"label">[125]</span></a>See <a href="#Page_604">Appendix.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_126"></a><a href="#FNanchor_126"><span class= +"label">[126]</span></a>Stafford Northcote had just been created +Earl of Iddesleigh.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_127"></a><a href="#FNanchor_127"><span class= +"label">[127]</span></a>Afterwards Sir Henry Cotton, K.C.S.I., +Chief Commissioner in Assam and M.P.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_128"></a><a href="#FNanchor_128"><span class= +"label">[128]</span></a>Sally Shackle, daughter of the Duke of +Somerset’s warrener at Bulstrode, entered my father’s service at +Crabbet in 1823 as cook and housekeeper, having just married Henry +Sellwood, my father’s valet, and lived on at Crabbet, with the +exception of the few years of my elder brother’s minority, till +1894, when she died, after seventy years of honourable service +spent, almost all of it, in one house.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_129"></a><a href="#FNanchor_129"><span class= +"label">[129]</span></a>Alfred Milner, now Lord Milner. He was at +that time assistant editor to Mr. Stead, who was for the moment in +prison in connection with the “Purity Campaign” he had been +carrying on in the “Pall Mall Gazette.” My letter, if I remember +rightly, was on Tory Socialism.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_130"></a><a href="#FNanchor_130"><span class= +"label">[130]</span></a>These entries about Ferid Bey are extremely +interesting now in connection with what happened on precisely the +same lines in Turkey twenty-three years later in 1908.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_131"></a><a href="#FNanchor_131"><span class= +"label">[131]</span></a>Afterwards the Right Hon. St. John +Brodrick, M.P., now Lord Midleton.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_132"></a><a href="#FNanchor_132"><span class= +"label">[132]</span></a>Permanent Under-Secretary of State, +afterwards ambassador in America.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_133"></a><a href="#FNanchor_133"><span class= +"label">[133]</span></a>Lord Salisbury’s private secretary, now Sir +Francis Villiers, ambassador at Lisbon.</p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_134"></a><a href="#FNanchor_134"><span class= +"label">[134]</span></a>See <a href="#appg3">Appendix.</a></p> +</div> + +<div class="footnote"> +<p><a id="Footnote_135"></a><a href="#FNanchor_135"><span class= +"label">[135]</span></a>This is necessary to the sense, but the +group or some equivalent has been omitted in cyphering.—A. W. M. +12/8</p> +</div> +</div> + +<p class="x-ebookmaker-drop space-above2"> +</p> + +<div class="transnote"> +<h2>Transcriber's note:</h2> + +<p>Some minor orthographic and punctuation changes have been done +silently.</p> + +<p>Spelling inconsistencies have been left unchanged.</p> +</div> +</div> +<div style='text-align:center'>*** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK 78995 ***</div> +</body> +</html> diff --git a/78995-h/images/cover.jpg b/78995-h/images/cover.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..b5b66c2 --- /dev/null +++ b/78995-h/images/cover.jpg diff --git a/78995-h/images/frontispiece.jpg b/78995-h/images/frontispiece.jpg Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..d440a16 --- /dev/null +++ b/78995-h/images/frontispiece.jpg |
